Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999/04/28 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY APRIL 28, 1999 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Macias __ Corn. Mannedno __ Com. Stewart __ Com. Tolstoy __ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 14, 1999 April 14, 1999, Adjourned Meeting IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related projecL Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15970 - SCHNEIDER - A residential subdivision of five single family lots on 1.96 acres of land in the Low Residential Distdct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Pepperidge Court, west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 202-041-70. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. De ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 - SHIBATA - A request for a time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map including design review for the development of 13 condominium units on 1.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-12 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of 19th Street between Amethyst Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 201-474-05. Related file: Tree Removal Permit 91-29. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT- 99-01 CATELLUS - A request to allow Community Commercial use on approximately 5.2 acres of land in Subarea 7 (Industrial Park) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 229-011-32. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15295 - CATELLUS - A subdivision of 140 acres of land into 13 parcels in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and General Industrial (Subarea 8) Districts of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Related file: Development Review 99-11. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. V. NEW BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-11 - CATELLUS - A request to establish a 140 acre master plan known as the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park, consisting of a mix of commercial and industrial development in Subarea 7 (Industrial Park) and Subarea 8 (General Industrial) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map 15295. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS USE DETERMINATION 99-01 - CHEVRON - A request to determine that a carwash is similar to other Auto Service Station uses and is a conditionally permitted use within the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. G. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT POLICY Page 2 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place forthe general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not e/ready appear on this agenda. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.mo adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING IN THE RAINS ROOM TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 99-04 (GRABIEL), PRE-APPLICA TION REVIEW 99-05 (KAPLAN), AND A QUARTERLY REVIEW OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PROJECTS I, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 22, 1999, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga. Page 3 VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 28, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Rudy Zeledon. Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15970 - SCHNEIDER - A residential subdivision of five single family lots on 1.96 acres of land in the Low Residential district (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Pepperidge Court, west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 202-041-70. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 2.5 dwelling units per acre Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North Single family residential; Low Residential District South ~ Single family residential; Low Residential District East Single family residential; Low Residential District West Single family residential; flood control channel; Low Residential District General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential Site Characteristics: The eastern portion of the project site is developed with a single family residence. The remainder of the parcel is vacant. The site is surrounded on the north, east, and south sides by single family residences and on the west side by a flood control channel. The project site has a slope of approximately 5 percent from the northeast to southwest portion of the site. ANALYSIS: General: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the property and sell the lots. There is no development application to build homes at this time; therefore, lots could be developed on an individual basis as custom homes. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT15970-SCHNEIDER April28.1999 Page 2 Desiqn Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) on a consent calender basis on April 14, 1999, and was approved as presented, Gradina and Technical Review Committees: The Committees reviewed the project and recommend approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. The Grading Committee recommends that a 4-foot retaining wall with a 4-foot wrought iron fence on top be constructed along the west property line (next to the flood control channel) of Lots 1 and 2. The recommended 4-foot retaining wall would match the existing wall on the adjacent property to the south and be consistent with the approved perimeter wall (along the flood control channel) for Tentative Tract 15926, which is two lots south of the project site. In addition, the natural slope is to be retained and grading minimized. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been prepared by the applicant and staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist. Staff feels the project will not have a significant adverse environmental impact. If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 15970 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issue a Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:RZ:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Plan Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions VICINITY MAP -< LAlq~ ii / 5 ~ Z.~ iO I N.T5 BA.e!~LINE .eT. I TENTATIVE TRA MAP 15970 -.-- .... ,,,, ~ ~ ~ \ ,! \ (4 \ \ ~ 'x~ , , "-,,,., I ,-, .... ,, , -~::?_-,,~ -,, -ILl CONCEPTUAk GRADN0 Pt. AN T.TJL 'a~).~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract 15970 2. Related File: N/A 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15970 - SCHNEIDER - A residential subdivision Of five single family lots on 1.96 acres of land in the Low Residential district (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Pepperidge Court, west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 202-041-70. 4. Project Sponsors Name and Address: Reiny Schneider 2036 Winston Court Upland, CA 91786 5. General Plan Designation: Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is surrounded by single family residential development to the north, south, and east and by a flood control channel to the west. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rudy Zeledon (909) 477-2750 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tr ] 5970 - Schneider Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Population and Housing (x) Geological Problems (x) Water ( ) Air Quality ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Hazards ( ) Noise ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Public Services ( ) Utilities and Service Systems ( ) Aesthetics ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: Assistant Planner (909) 447-2750 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga -TI' 15970 - Schneider Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.' a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga -TT 15970 - Schneider Page 4 b) Seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d) Seiche hazards? e) Landslides or mudflows? f) Erosion. changes in topography. or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading. or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? h) Expansive soils? i) Unique geologic or physical features? Comments: ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) (x) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) (x) ( ) (x) The site appears to have had some dumping of soils over the past years which has changed the original topography of the site. A soils report will be required by the Building and Safety Division prior to the issuance of building permits. This impact is not considered significant. 4. WATER. t4rlll the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates. drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature. dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals. or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations. or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge. capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga "TT 15970- Schneider Page 5 g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) ( ) No (x) (x) (x) Comments: a) The project will cause changes in the absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape resulting from subsequent development on the vacant site, Project design includes appropriate drainage devices. The small size of the site will generate a less than significant amount of water runoff; therefore, the impact is not considered significant. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.' a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Alter air movement, moisture. or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) d) TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.. farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga "FI' 15970 - Schneider Page 6 e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? () () () () () () No (x) (x) (x) BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated spedies (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g. , marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? () () () () () () () () ) ) ) (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.' a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? () () () () () () NO (x) (x) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga -']-r 15970 - Schneider Page 7 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ( ) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) e) Increased fire hazard in areas with fiammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) No ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) (x) 10, NOISE. Will the proposal result in.' a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? () () () () () () (x) (x) 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? () () () () () () () () () () () () () () () No (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga 'TT 15970 - Schneider Page 8 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS, Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) b) Communication systems? ( ) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? ( ) d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) No ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) () () () () () () (x) (x) (x) 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Wou/d the proposal a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) () () () () () () () () () () No (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TT 15970 - Schneider Page 9 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? No ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) 16o MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term. to the disadvantage of long- term. environmental goals? (A shod-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TT 15970 - Schneider Page 10 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (X) General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) (X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The fo~owing Negative Declaration Is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract 15970 Public Review Period Closes: April 28, 1999 Project Name: Project Applicant: Reiny Schneider Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the north side of Pepperidge Court, west of Hellman Avenue - APN: 202-041-70. Project Description: A residential subdivision of five single family lots on 1.96 acres of land in the Low Residential Distdct (2-4 dwelling units per acre). FINDING This Is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. ["l The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant effects would occur. and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Apdl 28. 1999 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15970, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 1.96 ACRES OF LAND INTO FIVE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PEPPERIDGE COURT, WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202-041-70. A. Recitals. 1. Reiny Schneider has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15970, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of April 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on Apd128, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Peppeddge Court in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located west of Hellman Avenue, with a street frontage of 251 feet and a lot depth of 152 feet and which is presently improved with a street and curb and gutter; and b. The properties to the north, south, and east of the subject site are developed with single family homes and the property to the west is a flood control channel; and c. The project involves the subdivision of a single parcel into five lots. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 'I'1'15970-SCHNEIDER Apd128,1999 Page 2 c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and eo The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause sedous public health problems; and f. The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: 'in considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Planninq Division 1 ) Upon development of the first lot, the following improvements shall be made: a) Construction of a 4-foot high retaining wall (to match existing wall on the property to the south) with a 4-foot wrought iron fence on top, along the west property line for Lots 1 and 2, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Tr15970-SCHNEIDER Apd128,1999 Page 3 b) Construction of a 6-foot perimeter wall along the north property lines of Lots 2 and 3 and on the north and west property lines of Lot 4. EnGineerina Division 1) Peppeddge Court shall be improved to local street standards. The improvements that have not been completed on the south side and at the cul-de-sac, such as sidewalks, parkway street trees, street lights, etc., shall be installed. 2) Improve Hellman Avenue to collector street standards including, but not limited to, street widening, street lights, traffic striping, and signing. 3) Street trees shall be Lagerstroemia Indica X Fauriei Eminole (Crape Myrtle Hybrid), 20 feet on center, 15-gallon size on Pepperidge Lane/Court; and Eucalyptus Polyanthemos (Silver Dollar Gum), 30 feet on center, 5-gallon size on Hellman Avenue. 4) The double retaining walls along the west side creates a non- maintained area. This issue shall be addressed. 5) Lot line adjustment is required to resolve the issue of wall structure built on the property line of Lot 5 and its northern property. Building and Safety Division 1) Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, UPC, UMC, and NEC. 2) Submit three complete sets of plans including the following: a) Site/Plot Plan b) Foundation Plan c) Floor Plan d) Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan e) Electrical Plans (2 sets detached) including size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams. Plumbing and Sewer Plans including isometrics, underground diagram, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT15970-SCHNEIDER Apd128,1999 Page 4 3) Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and soils report. Architect's/Engineers stamp and "wet" signature is required, prior to plan check submittal. 4) School District fees shall be paid prior to permit issuance. Applicant shall provide copy of receipt to the Building and Safety Division. 5) Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 6) Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation to City prior to permit issuance. 7) Property lines may not pass through structures. Provide dimensions from structures to proposed property lines. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary I, Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of April 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Tentative Tract No. 15970 Reiny Schneider North side of Pepperidge Court, west of Hellman Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDInONS A~_PL Y T~ O yOUR PROJECT. APPLICANTSHALL CONTACTTHE PLANNING DIVISION (909)477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCEWITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City. its agents. officers. or employees, because of the issuance of such approval. or in the alternative. to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents. officers. or employees. for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City. its agents. officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. CompletJon Date / A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shaft be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits Subdivision approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans. architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. $c - 4/~4s9 1 Project No, TT1597Q Completion Date Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as gradin9, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effod to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify. by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days pdor to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project's perimeter. D. Landscaping / / A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vedical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope. shall be, at minimum. irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pdor to occupancy. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub pereach 100 sq. ft. ofslope area, and apprepriateground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units. an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. J PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: E. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e. , CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s). the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee. Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. F. Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Dedication and Vehicular Access Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. H. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets. drainage facilities, community trails, paseos. landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include. but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement. drive approaches. sidewalks, street lights. and street trees. 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: Street improvement plans. including street trees. street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Pro~ectNo. 1'1'15970. CompleUon Date Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. __ / Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or seconda~/streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and intemonnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer, Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and payin9, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. I. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. / / / / / / / J. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including san taW sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable 'iV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from Project No, Ti" 15970, Completion Date the CCWD ~s required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. K. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTiON/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Fire flow requirement shall be 1,250 gallons per minute. × a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. X b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber. roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall he upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. 5. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. X Other: Dead end cul-de-sacs maximum 600 feet in length. $132.00 Fire District fee(s), and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit issuance. ** A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal. **Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 U BC, UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. / / / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 28, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Warren Morelion, Planning Aide ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 - SHI BATA - A request for a time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map including design review for the development of 13 condominium units on 1.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of 19th Street between Amethyst Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 201-474-05. Related file: Tree Removal Permit 91-29. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 15247 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on March 25, 1992. Since that time, the State granted automatic time extensions for several years during the recession. This extended the expiration of the subject Tentative Tract to March 25, 1998. On May 27, 1998, a time extension for the Tentative Tract was approved by the Planning Commission. This extended the Tentative Tract's expiration date for one-year to March 25, 1999. Prior to expiration, the applicant filed the subject time extension request. TRACT TIME EXTENSION: In 1998, the City Council amended the City's Subdivision Ordinance to provide for the maximum time extensions allowable under the State Subdivision Map Act. The City may extend tentative tract maps for up to 11 years from the original approval date. Extensions are granted in 12 month increments. There are four more 12 month time extensions available that may be granted by the City (up to the year 2003). Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension and compared the proposal with current development criteria outlined in the Development Code. In 1991, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 465, which established new standards for multi-family development. The project meets all standards, except does not provide 125 square feet of lockable storage space on the exterior of the unit or within the garage. Staff believes that the project could easily be modified to provide the required storage space as part of the re-application for a new Design Review approval as noted below. DESIGN REVIEW TIME EXTENSION: No further time extensions are possible and none was requested by the applicant. The related Design Review application expired on March 25. 1999. In December 1998, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 596 establishing a five-year approval period, with no time extensions. for Development/Design Review applications. Therefore, under the current local law the related Design Review application would have expired on March 25. 1997. ITEH B . PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 15247 - SHIBATA April 28, 1999 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pad I of the Initial Study has been prepared by the applicant. Staff has completed Pad II of the Environmental Checklist and found that conditions in the area have not changed appreciably since the Tentative Tract was originally approved May 27, 1998. Staff recommends adherence to the mitigation measures for noise and tree removal, which were included in the original project approval. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted. and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a one-year time extension for Tentative Tract 15247 through the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:WM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "F" - Elevations Exhibit "G" - Initial Study Part II Exhibit "H" - Tree Identification Plan Resolution of Approval March 15, 1999 City of Rancho Cucarnonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. C~ltfomia 91729 Attention: Brad Buller Planning Department RECEIVED MAR 2 3 1999 city ol Rancho Cucamonga P~anning Division 'IllviE EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 We are requesting a time extension for Tentative Tract 15247. We have enclosed the extention fee of $549.00. If you need to contact us for further questions or information you can contact us at (702) .263-1872 and ask for Royce or Terry Shibata. Royce Shibata (702) 263-1872 DUPLICATE RECEIPT DUPLIC~IE RECEIPT CITY OF RICHO CUCP,~3NGR 98~-477-~788 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE REG-RECEIPT:81-8876949 C:83-84-1999 C~SHIER ID:S 89:86:88 R:83-24-1ggg 1813 PtRNNIN8 FEES $549.88 TR15847 TERRY SHIB~TR 881-3981-TBB-8888-8888 TOTAL DUE $549.88 REC~I~D FROM: IPO BOX 68579 BOULDER CITY NV CHECK: $549.88 TOT~ TENDERED $549.88 ~E DUE 18.88 DUPLI~TE RECEIPT DUPLI~TE RECEIPT P.O. BOX C:~)579. I]~)U/,,D ER CrTY. NEVADA 89014 {70'2) 2G3-1872 FIRST R. OOR PLAN ~ MV~T'/~~/Z~ ~ LEGEND ~ II FOR CO~NDOMIUM PURPOSES TENTAT I VE TRACT NO. 15247 J, S3,%~FIJ.~ I05 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 - SHIBATA 10. Related Files: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 91-29 Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 - SHIBATA - A request for the extension of a previously approved tentative tract map including design review for the development of 13 condominium units on 1.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of 19u' Street between Amethyst Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 201-474-05 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Royce & Terry Shibata 2439 Antler Point Drive Henderson, Nevada 89014 General Plan Designation: Medium Residential Zoning: Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project is surrounded on the north by senior apartments, on the south by single family residence, to the east by a church, and to the west by a single family home and multi-family units. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Warren Morelion Planning Aide (909) 477-2750 Other agencies whose approval is required: Cucamonga County Water District Caltrans . Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact." "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Population and Housing (1) Geological Problems (v') Water ( ) Air Quality (~,/) Transportation/Circulation (,,/) Biological Resources ( ) Energy and Minera~ Resources ( ) Hazards (v') Noise ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Public Services (~') Utilities and Service Systems (~') Aesthetics ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (,/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () Signed: I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Warren Morelion Planning Aide March 31, 1999 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. LAND c) d) USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.' Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established commu0ity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal.' a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? () () (v) () () (v) () () (v) GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving.' a) Fault rupture? () () () (v) Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 b) g) h) i) Seismic ground shaking? Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? Seiche hazards? Landslides or mudflows? Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation. grading, or fill? Subsidence of the land? Expansive soils? Unique geologic or physical features? CommeN~: ( ) ( ) ( ) (v,) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (v,) ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') () () (~) ( ) () () () (~) () () () (~) () () () (~) The topography of the project site will be altered to accommodate the buildings. The grading will be supervised by a licensed soils engineer or registered geologist to ensure compliance With building code requirements. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) b) C) d) Changes in absorption rates. drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through~ substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? () () (~) () () () () (~) () () () (~) () () (~) () () (~) () (~) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 Page 5 g) h) i) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? Impacts to groundwater quality? Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ) () () ) () () (v) ) () () (v) Comments: a) The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and hardscape proposed. All water will be conveyed to appropriate drainage facilities. including a new storm drain and catch basin designed to handle the water flows. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) b) c) d) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? Alter air movement. moisture. or temperature, or cause any change in climate? Create objectionable odors? (v) (v) (v) (v TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) b) c) d) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (v) () () (v) () (v) () (v) -Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 Page 6 e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts. bicycle racks)? f) g) Rail or air traffic impacts? () () (v) () () () (v) () () () (v) Comments: a) The project will generate additional passenger car and truck trips because of the new construction and the resulting residential units. The number of trips is not expected to be significant. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened. or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish. insects, animals, and birds)? ( b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, dparian, and vernal pool)? ( e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( () (v) () (~) () () () (~) () (~) () (~) Comment,s: b) The site contains many mature trees which am in conflict with the proposed development and improvements. An arborist report was prepared for this site to determine the significance of the trees and the feasibility of relocatin9 them to areas which are not in conflict with the proposed project. As a result, the following recommendations have been made (Exhibit "H"): Trees No. 6-10, 13, 16, 22, 24: Not subject to protection because of size or species. Replacement trees are not required. . Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Trees No. 1, 11, 14, 15, 18, 20, 21: Arborist recommends removal because of poor 'health, structure, or species of tree(s). These trees should be replaced with the largest nursery-grown stock available. Trees No. 4, 5, 12, 17, 19: Arborist recommends preservation through transportation elsewhere on site. Plotting should be incorporated into the final landscaping plan. Trees No. 2, 3, 23: Off-site, conservable. These trees should be protected during construction because of their proximity to the proposed improvements. Staff has determined that any significant effects created by the proposed project can be mitigated to a level that is insignificant with the relocation and replacement of existing mature tees. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.' a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (~/) HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including. but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? () () () (v) () () () (v) () () () (v) () () () (v) -Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 Page 8 e) Increased fire hazard in areas with fiammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) No () () (v) 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) No () (v) () (v) () () Comlllents: a) The project involves the development of 13 condominiums units. Construction activity is likely to result in an increase in noise levels from associated grading and development activity. Construction hours will be limited per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to lessen any construction-related disturbance in noise levels to the surrounding properties. The resulting residential project is not likely to produce a significant increase in existing noise levels. b) The residential project fronts 19th Street, designated as a State highway and a secondary road in the City. The General Plan indicates that noise contours in the 601dn will be presented at the site. A noise study was prepared by Gordon Bricken & Associates on April 8, 1991, to determine what mitigation measures would be necessary to reduce noise levels to a permissible level. To mitigate significant adverse impacts from traffic on 19th Street, the noise study recommends the construction of a sound wall 5 feet in height for the first floor patios that face south. A 4-foot high sound wall for the second floor balconies that front 19th Street is also recommended. Noise from the future Route 210 Freeway will be mitigated by sound walls included in freeway design, the physical separation from Route 210, and the existing three-story apartments to the north. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? () () () (v) () () () (v) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 Page 9 c) d) e) Schools? Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Other governmental services? () () () () () () () (v) () (v) () (v) 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or suppries or substantial alterations to the fo~owing utilities: a) b) c) d) 0 g) Power or natural gas? Communication systems? Local or regional wa, ter treatment or distribution facilities? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solid waste disposal? Local or regional water Supplies? () () () () () () (v) () (v) () (v) () (v) (v) () () (v) () (v) Comments: e) The proposed project will involve the need for a storm drain and catch basin within 19th Street to accommodate water run-off and drainage from the site. As a condition of the tract map approval, construction of a storm drain and catch basin will be required. The storm drain and catch basin will be built in accordance with the City Plan for the storm drain system. The resulting impact on services is not likely to be significant. 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) ( ) ( ) ( ) (v) -Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 Page 10 c) Create light or glare? () () (v) ( ) Comments: c) New light and glare will be created because the property is currently vacant. A condition of approval requires the applicant to submit a lighting plan for review and approval to ensure minimal impacts to surrounding properties. Light provided to illuminate parking areas will be required to reflect away from residential uses and roadways. As a result of these measures, the effects of the new light generated is not expected to be significant. 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal,' a) b) c) d) e) Disturb paleontologi'cal resources? ( ) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? () () () () (v) () (v) () (v) () () (v) (v) 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal.' a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? () () unbu () () () () No (v) (v) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT 15247 Page 11 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community. reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts .will endure well into the future.) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? c) d) () () () (v) () () () (v) () () () (v) () ( () (v) EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (v) General Plan EIR (Certified Apri, 6, SENT 8Y: R CUCAM~NOA COU DEVi 4- 7-99 8:35AM; 9094772847 -> ?02+263~e72; initial Study for ' ' City of Rancno Cucamcnga TENTATIVE TFI~CT 15247 .Page 12_ (v') Master Environmental A3seSsr~ent for the 1989 General Plan Update . (SCH #88020'115, cadtried January 4, 1989) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I ¢edlfy that i am~the applicant i'of the project described i~n this Initial Study, I acknowledge that I nave mad this Initial Study and time proposed mttigellon measures. Further, I have revised the. project plans or pro hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to 3void effects or mltlg point where cleady no significant environmental effects Date: lilly . Print Na.m.e and Title: //~[/---~' ,,-f2-//~'4-~"4 : : : City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration Is being circulated for pubtic review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Time Extension for Tentative Tract 15247 Public Review Period Closes: Apdl 28, 1999 Project Name: Project Applicant: Royce &Terry Shibata Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the north side of 19th Street between Amethyst Street and Hellman Avenue - APN: 201-474-05. Project Description: A request for a time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map including design review for the development of 13 condominium units on 1.4 acres of land in the Medium Residential Distdct (8-12 dwelling units per acre). Related file: Tree Removal Permit 91-29. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: E] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909} 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public Is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. April 28, 1999 Date of Determination Adopted By : 0 z4 l .. _ I I I ~ _ 4'1 L 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE EXTENSION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15247, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 13 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 1.4 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET BETWEEN AMETHYST STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-474-05. A. Recitals. 1. Royce and Tern/Shibata have filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15247, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 25, 1992, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 92-55, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On the 28th day of Apdl 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said headrig on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined. and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing on April 28, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies: and b. The extension of the Tentative Tract Map approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan. specific plans. ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and c. The extension of the Tentative Tract Map approval is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. '1~'15247-SHIBATA Apd128,1999 Page 2 d. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753,5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration. the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing. the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tentative Tract Applicant Expiration Tentative Tract 15247 Royce & Terry Shibata March 25, 2000 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman · PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15247 - SHIBATA Apdl 28, 1999 Page 3 ATTEST: Lawrence J, Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary I, Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of April 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 28, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - CATELLUS - A request to allow the Community Commercial use on approximately 5.2 acres of land in Subarea 7 (Industrial Park) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APN: 229-011-32. ABSTRACT: The applicant has requested amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan lISP) definition of Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements to allow buildings over 25,000 square feet when approved by a Condilional Use Permit. This amendment is necessary to accommodate a Lowe's Home Improvement store proposed at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. ANALYSIS.: General: The proposed text amendment would allow for home improvement stores to be developed within Subarea 7. An application has been submitted for a Lowe's Home Improvement store of approximately 185,225 square feet (135,200 square feet of floor area and 49,025 square feet of garden center) and two restaurant pad buildings. The site falls within Subarea 7 (Industrial Park) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Subarea 7 is intended to function as a transition between large warehouse industrial development to the south and the Terra Vista planned community to the north. In this vein, Subarea 7 currently allows for retail and wholesale Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvement stores of 25,000 square feet or less. Staff believes that a large home improvement center would be consistent with this transition of land use. The use is being proposed as a conditionally permitted use. Lowe's has filed Conditional Use Permit 99-04 in anticipation of the proposed amendment being approved. Site and use specific issues would be analyzed and addressed with the Conditional Use Permit. Environmental Assessment: The proposed amendment is not defined as a project by the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15378 and is, therefore, exempt from environmental review per CEQA Section 15061 (b)l. Facts for Findinq: The proposal is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan. The proposal will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or uses and will not cause adverse environmental impacts. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISPA 99-01- CATELLUS April 28, 1999 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were magiled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of this amendment to the City Council through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Subarea 7 Map Exhibit 'C" - AppliCant's Letter Resolution Recommending Approval to City Council j ~' ~""7~" "'5'' ' ': ....'~'i Meridi ....~ '."'% SPORTS PA~K~ I ,, ANI~ ALS IELTE ,.J...', -. ...... . -" ' ~" -· ' ....": 'iL-~ -','.~ anl ' ' ~ rime Paper ~ . .. llJIl Arrow Route I 8530 Milliken .., Vacant '' ' ' '~ i~ "~ "" 1'/ .....::t: ....... ', ~a~,,..,,.~.,.,~ ~ .' ,, · -...I- I [ _. N Janua~ 9,1999 Brad Buller, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Application Submittal Package for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Dear Mr. Buller: On behalf of the Catellus Development Corporation, we are submitting applications for a Development Review for the Master Plan, a Specific Plan Amendment to the Industrfal Area Specific P/an, a Tentative Parcel Map, and the associated environmental Initial Study for property located on approximately 140 acres in the southeast sector of Rancho Cucamonga. The Master Plan has been prepared to serve as a guide for projects within an overall development framework directed toward achieving development consistency with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan. The Master Plan further specifies master design cdteda while meeting the individual design and development needs of specific projects within the area. We are submitting a Development Review application for the Master Plan which receives approval at the Planning Commission level. Concurrently, the Specific Plan Amendment application is submitted, which continues on for City Council consideration after Planning Commission action. While we realize that no final permits could be approved for an individual project until that Specific Plan Amendment receives final reading, it does allow the project to move forward in design phases. Another component to the process is the separate submittal by Lowe's Home Center for a Conditional Use Permit to develop the site at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. The application is expected to be submitted to the City in approximately one week. This will constitute the first phase of development for the Subarea 7 portion of the Corporate Park. With this Application Package submittal, we are submitting the following items: Uniform Application for Development Review, Specific Plan Amendment and Tentative Parcel Map Completed Initial Study, Part I Filing Fees for a total of $20,340.00 Development Review - $8553. O0 Specific Plan Amendment - $8598.00 Tentative Parcel Map - $2514.00 Initial Study- $675. O0 copies of Master Plan Note: The Master Plan document is being submitted in a 3-ring binder format for ease of review and revision. The final Master Plan document will be provided in a bound format. 4200 Latham Strecl. Suite B. Riverside. C. alifornxa 92501 , 909 / ~'87-9222 * FAX 909 / 781-6OI4 · E-Mail: filRiver~pacbc[l n~.t Brad Buffer, City Planner Page 2 Application Package-Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Pad< Master Ran Q Q 0 O 0 8 sets of development package including Master Site Plan, Conceptual Bu~ding Elevations, Master Landscape Plan, Landscape and Hardscape Elevations, Tentative Pamel Map, Conceptual Grading Plan and Conceptual Utility Plan 5 sets of typed gummed labels. including all required public notice materials Note: It is anticipated that this notice information can be used for the Lowe's Conditional Use Permit application provided that public hearing timing coincides with the Master Plan schedule. Hazardous Waste and Site Statement I set of photographs with location map A Traffic Study is being prepared and will be submitted to the City within two weeks Comments received from the Planning Commission at the Pre-Application Review on January 13, 1999. and from staff at our weekly meetings dudng the past month have proved to be invaluable in guiding us to a Master Plan document that we feel will best serve Catellus and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We truly appreciate your continued guidance on this project. Should you have any questions. please contact me or David Rogers at (909) 787-9222. Sincerely, e a Steele Principal attachments CC: Charles A. McPhee, Catellus Development Corporation Craig Halverson, Catellus Development Corporation Jerry McKee. Catellus Development Corporation Dennis Hill, Hill Pinckert Architects Charles Lamb, Emerald Design Don Winn, Lowe's Page Winkler, Nadel Architects Thomas Baber, Adams Engineering enclosure RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF SPECIALTY BUILDING SUPPLIES AND HOME IMPROVEMENTS TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT BUILDINGS OVER 25,000 SQUARE FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Hogle Ireland has filed an application for Industdal Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution. the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of April 1999. the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 28, 1999, including written and oral staff reports. together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment; and c. The proposed amendment furthers the intent of Subarea 7 to function as a transition between industrial development to the south and commercial/retail development to the north. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Development Code; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 99-01-HOGLEIRELAND Apd128,1999 Page 2 c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Development Code; and e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that the amendment is not defined as a project, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)l and 15738. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 99-01 amending Page 111-14 regarding the definition of Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvements, as attached. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED tHIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary I, Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary for the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of April 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Indusrrfal ~4rea Specific Plan Part IIZ, SecHon H Restaurants with Bar or Entertainment:. Acffi/ffies typically include. but are not limited to: ~e retail sale. from the premises, of unpackaged food or beverages, including hard liquor, generally prepamcl for on-premises consumffion. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: restaurants with hard liquor sales, dandug, or entertainment cocktail lounges; and bars. Proposed Specific Plan Amendment Soecialtv Buildino Suoolies and Home Improvements: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail and wholesale sales and installation of specialty items, such as paint; wall/floor/window coverings; doors and windows; building materials; hardware, plumbing and elecffical supplies; bath and kitchen fixtures and supplies; lighting; swimming pools and supplies; and garden furnishings, materials and supplies. Activities shall be conducted in endused buildings of 25,000 square feet or less. Uses excluded from this c,,i~--gory are general merchandise stores. Buildings over 25,000 square feet may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandisino Business: W~hln an approved Warehouse-Styis Retail Merchandising Center, this cat~Jory adds to the ratall uses already perinitial for the Subarea in which the Center is s~ated. Retail uses shall be added which am consistent with General Commercial Uses wiffiin the General Commercial Disthct of the Development Code (Sec'don 17.10.030) and which are incorporated heroin by fu~ura~ce. In the event of a conffict between whether a use is permitled or conditionally permitted, the Subarea requirement applies. Ught Wholesale, Storage and Dis~lbution is already a permib~l use. The intent Is to emphasize and expand retail use in conjunction wiffi warehouse use in Subarea 12 which is transitional between indusb'tal and retail commemtal land use am&s. F_ CIVIC USE TYPES Admini~i~d~ve Civic.Services: Ac'dvities typically include. but am not limited to: management, administrative, or dedcal services performed by public, quasi-public. and public utility admini~h,~ffi/e offices. Convention Centers: Activities typically include, but am not limited to: conferences. seminars, product demonstrations, and toumamenta within an enclosed building for assembled groups or spectators or participants. Uses typically include convention centers and exhibition halls. Cultural: Activities typically include, but am not limited to, those performed by or at the following institutions or installations: Public and private performing arts canters (i.e., music, dance, dram) not including nightclubs; Public and private museums and art galleries; Public and private librades and observatories. Day Care Facility: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: establishments for non- medical care to infants and preschool and school age children under 18 years of age during a portion of the day. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: infant canters, nursery schools, pre-schools, and similar facilities. 111.14~________, C~ 6~97 tr 'N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 28, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Betty Miller, Associate Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15295 - CATELLUS - A subdivision of 140 acres offand into 13 parcels in the Industriai Park (Subarea 7) and General Industrial (Subarea 8) Districts of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Rome - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Related file: DR 99-11. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Pamel Map as shown on Exhibit "B". B. Parcel Size: Parcel I 9.04 AC Parcel 8 6.04 AC Parcel 2 0.54 AC Parcel 9 22.98 AC Parcel 3 13.48 AC Pamel 10 7.45 AC Parcel 4 0.40 AC Parcel 11 20.58 AC Parcel 5 5.06 AC Parcel 12 9.41 AC Parcel 6 4.42 AC Parcel 13 21.07 AC Parcel 7 17.65 AC TOTAL 138.12 AC C. Existin~ Zoning: Industrial Park, ISP Subarea 7, and General Industrial, ISP Subarea 8 D. Surroundine Land Use and ZoninR: North - South - East West Vacant and medical Vacant (some industrial west of Milliken Avenue) Rancho Cucamonga Sports Complex and Masi plaTa Industrial and some vacant ITEN D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 15295 April 28, 1999 Page 2 E. Surrounding General Plan and Developments Code Desicmations: North - Tetra Vista Community Plan, Mixed Use (Commercial, office, hospital and some residential) South - ISp Subarea 9, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial East ISP Subarea 7 and 8, Industrial Park and General Industrial West ISP Subarea 7 and 8, Industrial Park and General Industrial F. Site Characteristics: The site is mostly vacant and slopes to the south at about 2 pement. Milliken Avenue bisects the site and a golf driving range (temporary use) utilizes an interim detention basin on the east half of the properly. The basin is no longer necessary due to installation of the Master Plan Storm Drain in Arrow Route. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to create 13 lots, consistent with the proposed Rancho Cucumonga Corporate Park master plan which you are reviewing as Development Review 99-I 1 elsewhere on tonight's agenda. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: As part of DR 99-11, the applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. The Negative Declaration for both projects will be issued under DR 99-11, also before you this evening. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding properly ownen and placed in the Inland Valley Dally Bulletin. Posting at the site has also been completed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map 15295 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, Senior Civil Engineer Attachments: Exhibit "A' - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Exhibit "C" - Master Plan ('DR 99-1 l) Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: NORTH r' = 1000' Tentative Parcel Map 15295 Vicinity Map · I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: NORTH 1" = 400' Tentative Parcel Man ! 5295 Tentative Map SUB AREA ~'ITY OF AREA USE TO BE, 'OTOE~T'M RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION J EANCIIO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK NORTH NTS ITEM: Tentative Parcel Map 15295 TITLE: Master Plan (DR 99-11) EXHIBIT: "C" RESOLUTION NO, a RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15295, LOCATED ON MILLIKEN AVENUE BETVVEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-011-25, 31 AND 32 WHEREAS, Tentative Pamel Map Number 15295, submitted by Hogle Ireland, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 13 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California, identified as APNs 229-011-25, 31, and 32, located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; and WHEREAS, on Apd128, 1999, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public headng for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the'following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for Development Review 99-11, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings for DR 99-11: SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 15295 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: EnaineednQ Division The center portion of Milliken Avenue shall be completed between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route upon development of the first parcel fronting Milliken Avenue. This will include median curbs, pavement on both sides of the median, and ultimate intersection PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PARCELMAP 15295 April28,1999 Page 2 improvements for Street "A," including right turn lanes. Extend the existing fourth northbound through lane on the east side of Milliken Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard to Street "A" and add a 300-foot right tum lane for the Foothill Boulevard intersection. This development shall not receive Transportation Development Fee credit for the backbone system since a City project completed the applicable portion of this segment. Median landscaping for the entire segment, north or south of Street "A," shall be installed upon development of the first parcel fronting the segment. The median shall be designed consistent with existing medians north and south of the site. Sidewalks and all drive approaches (with right turn lanes) on the project side of the street, for the entire segment north or south of Street "A," shall be installed upon development of the first pamel fronting the segment. If the right turn lane for Foothill Boulevard is combined with the right turn lane for the drive approach north of Street "A," the total length will be about 550 feet. Existing bus bays on Milliken Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard and north of Arrow Route, shall be extended and combined with right turn lanes for the first respective driveways. Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements, including curb, gutter, street lights, a bus bay just east of the Milliken Avenue ECR, all ddve approaches (with right turn lanes) and sidewalk, shall be completed from Milliken Avenue to the existing terminus west of Masi Drive upon development of the first parcel fronting Foothill Boulevard. Sidewalk on the west side of Milliken Avenue and all off-site street trees may be deferred until development of the adjacent properties. A "street type" driveway will be allowed for the project driveway opposite Mayten Street. If the developer chooses to defer the decision on a ddveway between Mayten Street and Masi Drive (including Caltrans permission therefore) until development of Parcel 7, curb and gutter shall be installed in lieu of a drive approach and right turn lane. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Street "A" upon development of any parcel along Street "A." Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Street upon development of any parcel utilizing the drive approach that aligns with Mayten Street. The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PARCELMAP 15295 Apd128,1999 Page 3 six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. Existing traffic signals at Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue/Arrow Route shall be modified as needed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The project's Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) study identified traffic impacts at six locations, which will result in an unacceptable level of service unless mitigated. The TIA has also determined the amount of this project's fair share contribution to these mitigations. A cash payment in lieu of construction as contribution for the following future projects shall be paid pdor to the issuance of building permits or final Parcel Map approval, whichever occurs first, in the following amounts: Amount Recipient AQencv Future Proiect $19,575 City of Ontado Widening Milliken Avenue to four through lanes and dght turn lane northbound plus three through lanes southbound and related signal improvements south of Fourth Street $19,247 City of Ontado Widening Milliken Avenue to three through lanes and two right turn lanes northbound and three through lanes and two left turn lanes southbound on both sides of Ontario Mills Road and related signal improvements $ 8,430 Caltrans Additional southbound right turn only lane for 1-15 Freeway off ramp S 18,085 Caltrans - Additional northbound right turn only lane for 1-15 Freeway off ramp $251,256 Caltrans Additional northbound lane on 1-15 Freeway between the I-10 Freeway and Foothill Boulevard $195,576 Caltrans Additional southbound lane on 1-15 Freeway between Foothill Boulevard and the 1-10 Freeway An in-lieu fee for one-half the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits or final Parcel Map approval, whichever occurs first. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP 15295 Apd128,1999 Page 4 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18, 19. A contribution in lieu of construction for the median island in Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits or final Parcel Map approval, whichever occurs first. The amount of the contribution shall be one-half the cost of the median (currently estimated at $60 per linear foot) times the length of the project frontage. Since them am so many driveways proposed along Milliken Avenue, a Special Boulevard, sidewalk easements allowing the sidewalk to meander, shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to I foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. Sidewalks shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. 'Provide additional public right-of-way as needed. Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of-way. All drive approaches shall conform to Standard Drawing No. 101 type C (minimum width 35 feet, maximum 50 feet, except on Foothill Boulevard opposite Mayten Street) and be perpendicular to the street. Only driveways ~0 feet wide can have medians. Driveways on Milliken Avenue shall be at least 300 feet from intersections to minimize weaving problems for traffic exiting right-turn- only driveways and making a left tum at the nearest signal Truck traffic to Parcels 9, 11, and 13 will be required to use Street "A" for access. Milliken Avenue driveways shall be posted with "no truck access" signs. Provide a bus bay on Arrow Route just west of Milliken Avenue. The driveway for Parcel 12 shall align with an existing driveway on the south side of Arrow Route west of Milliken Avenue. Provide a dght turn lane. The existing storm drain in Milliken Avenue shall be extended concurrent with the street improvements. All stub outs for future development shall be provided at that time. The final drainage report shall also address interim and ultimate requirements for the public storm drain shown crossing Parcel 3 on the Conceptual Grading Plan. Manholes shall be provided at each junction between public and private storm drain systems (applies to Arrow Route connection). This is not a requirement for private laterals as shown along Milliken Avenue. Provide a 12-foot wide public storm drain easement across Parcel 3, if needed. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP 15295 Apd128, 1999 Page 5 Fire Safety Division 1. Provide secondary access for Street "A" to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief and City Engineer. 2. Each parcel shall have a stand alone fire protection system. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANGHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Lawrence J. Henders6n, AICP, Acting Secretary I, Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of April 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCH0 CUCA iONGA STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO./.5'2 c]5' Those items checked are Conditions of Approval 9. 10. I1. Dedications and Vehicular Access Righu-of-way and casements shall be dedicated to the City for aU interior public streets, com~uaiD' trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachmere and maintenance and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Dedicalion shall be made of the following righu-of-way for the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 62 --C,'t ,otalfeeto. t.~-'9'Ototalfeetoa iUf /' ////~C,,~ total feet on An ir'n:vocable offer of dedlcation for roadway purposes shall be made tbt the private streets. Comer propert:,.' line culo~'s shall be dedicated per City Standards. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City li:r the folloxving streets. except for approved openings: Reciprocal access c~ements shall be provided ~nsuring a~:css to all parcels by C C & R's or by deeds ~d shall be recorded prior to or cone~t with ~e Final p~c¢l map. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintcnancc of all conanon roads, drives, or parking areas shall bc provided by C C & R's or deeds and shall bc recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel map. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way arc to bc quitclaimed or delineated on the final pamel map per the City Engineer's requirements. Easements for public sidev,'alks and/or street trees placed outside the public fight-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. Private drainage casements for cross-lot drainage shail be provided and shah bc delineated or noted on the llnai parcel map. Addillonal street ~ght-of..way sitall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 i~:ct nlcasurcd l~om the face of curbs. ff curb adjacent sidewalk is used along tile figIll turn hmc, a parallel street tree easement shall be provided. I 12. The developer shall make a good faith eftbr~ to acquire the required off site prope~y interests necessary to construct the required public improvements and. iX he/she should t~iI to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submiHal of the final parcel map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Goveroment Code Section 66462 at such time as the Cin.' acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such a~eement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs Incurred by the City to acquixe the off-site propeta,.' ;nterests required ;n connection with the subdivision. SeeuriC' for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developet's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in parlieular, but not limited to: Street Improvements All public improvements. (interior streets, drainage facilities, communiv,.' trails, puscos, landscaped areas. etc. ) show'n on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street In~proveroents shah include. but are not limited to. curb and gutter. AC pavement. drive approaches, sidewalks. street lights. and street trees. mlniroum. of 26-foot wide pavement witWa a .10- foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed all half-section streets. Construct the following missing perimeter street improvements including. but not limited to: Note~: (a) ~fedl.m Islznd include land. sca~ing a/~d irfigallon on m~er. d~e~ined du~n~ pl~ chec~ (e) [fso m~ked, sidewalk will ~ cm'iline~ ofc~s~ion fee s~ll be provided f~r ~is item. V/' 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: Street improvement plans including street trees, street ~xt.~ and intersection safetv lights on future si!~al poles. and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall bc submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be pusled and an agreement executed 2 Y 8. to the satisfaction of the Ci~' Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to l~al parcel map approval. b. Prior to an}' work.being performed in the public ~ght-of-v,'ay, l~es shall be paid and a construction permit sha~l be obtah~ed from the Ci~' Engineer's office in addition to any other permits required. C4 Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name st.taxing, traffic si_onal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be instalLled to the satisfaction of the Ci~' Engineer · Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be is. stalled with any new construction or reconslmction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. No~: (I) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at inter~ee~io~ ~nd No. ~ along su'ecu. · rtax/mu-n of 200 fcct a~at~ unless otherwise specified by ~c City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-1rich (at intersconjoin). or 2-inch (along suecu) galvaz~lcd steel wilJ1 pulltop< or az specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be in. stalled on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads requiting construction shall remain open to Irafile at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane elosuxe permits arc requixed. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon eompletinn or the coastmotion to the saltsfaction of the Ci~)' Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be inslallcd to City Standards, except for single farnil)' residenlial lois. h. Street names shall be approvcd by the Cin.' Planner prior so subm no for first plan check. Street improvcntenl plans per City Slandanls for all private streets shall be provided for rcvlcw and approval by the City Engineer. PHor to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and consInaction pcmlits shall be oblaincd from the City Enginccr's office in addition to any olher pcmfils required. Sireel Irees, a mininmm of 15 - gallon size or larger sitall be installed per Cliy Slandards in accordance with the City's strccl tree progran~. Intersection line of sight designs shall be re~'iev,'cd by the City Engineer for conformante with adopted policy. On collector or larger street, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street inlersections and eommerclal or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. A Perrail shall be obtained ~om CALTRANS rot an). work ',~ithin the following right-or-way: All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationalIv compc(c prior to the issuance of building permits. Puhlie Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be subtitled to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to t'mal parcel map approval. The rollowing landscaped parkways, medians, pasens, easements. trails. or other area.-; shall be annexed into the 3 Landscape Maintenance District: Mi I{i ke , .z/ 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas {'qO %) ofmortai~d cobble or offier acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Dislzicts shall be/'fled with the {::it:,' Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Fomlatinn costs shall be boroc by the developer. 4. All requited public landscaping and igigation systems shall bc continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by die City. 5. Park'way landscaping on the follov,'ing street(s) shall conform to the rcsuhs of the respective Beautification Master Plan: Drainac, e and Flood Control I. The project (or portions thefop0 is located witkin a Flood Hazard Zone; thcreforo, flood protection measures shall be provided as cerlified by a registered Civil Engineer and approvcd by the (:it)' Engineer. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have lhc current F[R~f Zone designation removed front the projoct area. The devcloper's engineer shall prcparo all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calcal'ations, A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA. prior to final parcel map approval. A Loner of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, wlfichcver occurs first. A/'real drainage study shall be submitted to and approvcd by the City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. All drainage facilities shall bc installed as required by the City Enginccr. Adequate provisions shall be niadc for acceptance and disposal orsurfacc drainage entering Ihc property from adjacent areas. A permit from the San Bernardtoo Coun~ Flood Control District is requited for work within it's right-of- 6. Trees are prohibited v.'ithin .5 feet or the outside diameter of an)' public stom'~ drain pipe measured from the oute'r cdgc of a mature trcc trunk. 7. Public storm drain easements shall be p'adcd Io convey overfiov,'s in the event of blockage in a sump caleb basin on a public street. Improvement Completion If the required public improvements arc not complctcd prior to approval ofthc final parcc[ map. an improvement security accontpanicd by an a.m'eement executed by the Developer and the Cty '.'.'ill be requited for: ~'r~sCr ",q , 4 If the required public improvemeals are not completed prior Io approval of TIM final parcel map, all improvealtar certificate shall be placed upon Ihc Fma/parcel nlap, siallag fltal fllcy will bc c, onlplclcd upon dcvclopmcnt ilm~ OF ~ 'Fee.%'r PA0..ce'L ~Lot,/G EACt.4 OF ~ Viililies Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanilary sewerage sysleoh water, g,s, ch:clric power. Iclephooe and cable TV (all uodcrgreund) ill accordmice wilh the Ulilily Shnldards. Eat`;cnlents shall be provided as rgqnirud. Water and sewer plans sitall be designed and conslruclcd Io inect rcqnircnlcnts of tile Cocalnonga COllilly Water Dislricl (CCWD), [(.mlcho Cucanlonga Fire ProrecitaL District. and the [:llvh'nlllllclllal Ilcallh DcpaMmcnt of Ihc Counly of San Bcmardlno. A lellcr of conqdiance l~onl CCWD is required prior Io I'nnd parcel Inap approval. Such I.:llcr nlusl Imve bccn issued by Ihe Walcr I)islricl willtill 90 days prior to final map approval in the cat~ of subdivision or prior In Ihc issuance of Ig:nnils ill Ill,: cat`to Of all other residential projccls. Approvals have nol beta secured troll all utililies and olher intorelied agencies involved. Approval of th.: thlal parc.:l map will be subjoel Io any r.:quir.:ments Illat may be r.:ccived fronl Ihenl. The developer sitall L,¢ tcsponsibk for Ihc reincarton ofcxisling utilities at,; n.:c.:ssa~. General Requiremeals and Alwprovals I. Th.: tentative nlnp appmvaJ is valid for Ih.:~mmllh period following the approval date. Tinu: cxlclt,;i,ns may bc granl.:d by Ihc Planning Cununi~,;ion, if requcsled prior to the cxpiralion dale. l'h.: applicanl shall agr,.'e. Io defcl~ nl his ~le .:xpcnsc any action broughl against the Cily, its agents, officers, or .:nlployegs. because of the issumlce of such approval. or in Ihc nllcrnaliw:. to relinquish such approval. The applicmll sitall refinbm'.,,: Ihc Cily, its agenil. officers or cnlployecs. for any cold calls and attomey's fe.:s which Ihe City, its agents, officers, or .:nlploy.:es nlay b¢ required by a courl Io pay at'~ n result of such action. The City may, at iL'g sole dLscrelion, participate at its own expense in lilc dcfcns,: of any such action but such padicipalion rJmll not relieve applicmd of his obligalion mtdcr this condition. 3. Final grading plans for each parcel shall be as required by tile Building and Safety Division pri,r Io issuance of grading p.:mlils. A copy of tile Covenants, Conditions, nod Restrictions (C C & R's) approv.:d by the City Attomcy is required prior to approval of file final pan:el inap. An casement for a joint tt~ driveway shall be provid.:d prior to final paw. el map approval for. Prior to approval oflhe final pare. el map a d.:posit shall be posl.:d with the City covc~ng tile cslimat.:d cosl of appodioning the at~,sc~,;incnls under Assc~nem District , alllong tile n.:wly created parcels. A non-n:ftmdablc deposit shall be paid to the City, covering th.: cstinlatcd operating costs for nil n..,'w sircol lights for the first 6 liontits of operalion. prior to final parcel map approval. Prior to fmalization of an}' development phase, suflicieat improvement plam¢ shall bc completed beyond the phase boua. daries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot fines shown on the approved tentative map, 9. Etiwanda/San Sevaine .-~ea Regional MaL,~ne. Seconda~' Regional. and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final parcel map approval. 10. Permits shall be obtained fi'om the following agencies for work within their right-of-way. 11. 12. 1.3. 1-~. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to rmal parcel map approval. Fom~,ation costs shall bc borne by the developer. Prior to recordalton of the final parcel map, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the cstabllslm~cnt or a Mcllo-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facihtics. However, if any school district has prerious[y established such a Conmlunity Facilities District. the applicant shall, in the altomotive, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing district prior to the recordalton of the final parcel map. Further. if the MTcctcd school district has not foreted a Mcilo-Roos Corninanity Facilities District within twe[vc mont]~; from the date of approval of lltc project and prior to the recordalton or the rmal parcel map for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall bc waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all afl~:ctcd school districts have entered into an agrocment to privately acconm~odate an)' and all schoo[ impacts as a rcsull or this project, Mcllo Roos Community Facilities District requirements for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dist6ct shall apply to this project. Pursuant to provisions of California Resources Code Section 210S9Co). this application shall not bc operative. vested or final, nor will building permits bc issued or a map recorded, until (I) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated enviromncnlal action is filed and posted with Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bcmardino; and (2) any and all required handling charges. arc paid to the County Clerk or thc County of San Bernardtoo. The applicant shall provldc the Engineering Department with a stamped copy or the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees havc becn paid. In Ihc cvcnt this application is determined exempt from such filing fccs pursuant to the provision or' the California Codc, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any requir~d handling charge for filing a Ccrti.ficatc of Fec Exemption, this condition shall bc deemed null and void. /- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 28, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Brent Le Count, ACIP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-11 CATELLUS - A request to establish a 140 acre master plan known as the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park, consisting of a mix of commercial and industrial development in Subarea 7 (Industrial Park) and Subarea 8 (General Industrial) of the Industrial Area specific Plan, located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map 15295. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: South - East West Surroundino Land Use and Zonincl: North - Vacant land and the Rancho San Antonio Medical Building; FinanciaI, Restaurants, Residential and Community Commercial and Hospital and Related Facilities. Office, Terra Vista Community Plan Industrial buildings; Subarea 9 (Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial) Industrial Area Specific Plan Masi Plaza and the Quakes Stadium; Subareas 7 and 8 (Industrial Park and General Industrial) Industrial Area Specific Plan Industrial Buildings; Subareas 7 and 8 (Industrial Park and General Industrial) Industrial Area Specific Plan General Plan Desionations: Project Site - Industrial Park and General Industrial North Commercial South - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial East Industrial Park and General Industrial West Industrial Park and General Industrial C, Site Characteristics: The 140-acre site is mostly vacant, but contains abandoned vineyards and a golf driving range in the southeast corner. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 2 percent. Parkinq: Parking compliance calculations will be performed with individual building projects. The Conceptual Master Plan includes parking areas based upon building utilizations that demand the lowest parking ratios; hence, it generally shows the maximum development that could be allowed. Parking will be addressed as each phase is submitted for development review. ITEN E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 99-11- CATELLUS April28,1999 Page 2 ANALYSIS: Backaround: The Planning Commission held a Pre-Application Review Workshop on the project on January 13, 1999. Concerns raised by the Commissioners included ensuring intensity of landscaping/screening along street frontages (especially Milliken Avenue), interface with the City's Adult Sports Park/Epicenter and Masi Plaza (the Master Plan provides for a 15-foot landscape swath and screen walls along the stadium site), large container truck traffic circulation, and articulation of building facades. The Commission indicated that departure from the established Activity Center concept schematic is acceptable so long as all four corners of the intersection at Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard are addressed. See attached minutes included as an exhibit in the Design Review Committee Action Agenda (Exhibit "H"). B, General: The Master Plan covers approximately 140 acres and may include more than a dozen buildings. A new cul-de-sac street is proposed to intersect the east side of Milliken Avenue near the dividing line between Subareas 7 and 8. A 66-foot wide private drive aisle is proposed to connect Foothill Boulevard with the cul-de-sac bulb. The northeast corner of the master plan area is anticipated to have research/development and office/industrial uses, but no specific building locations have been determined. A Lowe's Home Improvement store is proposed at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard under a separate application (Conditional Use Permit 99-04). Other uses proposed include warehouse, office, and restaurant. Three large (400,000 square foot plus) warehouse buildings are proposed in the south portion of the Master Plan area. TwO of these buildings have recently been submitted for design review (Parcels 9 and 11 ). The site is split between Industrial Park (Subarea 7) on the northern third of the site and General Industrial (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan on the remainder. The Industrial Park (Subarea 7) is intended to function as a transition zone between the General Industrial area to the south and commercial/retail development to the north. The land use program established by the Master Plan is consistent with this intent. The City adopted the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement (included with the Design Review Action Agenda - Exhibit "H") to establish special streetscape design features which "tie" together the visual aspects of this important corridor. The intersection of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard is designated as an Activity Center, The Master Plan proposes a departure from the Activity Center design per the Supplement. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the proposed Activity Center design and recommends approval. Desian Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fang) reviewed the project on April 6, 1999, and recommended approval. Please refer to attached Design Review Committee Action Agenda (Exhibit "H"). D. Technical and Gradina Review Committees: The Committees reviewed the project and recommend approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant and staff completed Part II. Staff identified potential impacts related to biological resources, traffic congestion, and secondary access. The U.S. Fish and. Wildlife Service identified the project area as a potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSF). As a result, habitat "PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 99-11- CATELLUS April28,1999 Page 3 assessments and biological surveys will be required to determine potential impacts to the DSF habitat for future development projects within the Master Plan area. A habitat assessment and soils study were recently conducted for the Lowe's Home Improvement store project (Conditional Use Permit 99-04), which covers approximately 5.2 acres at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, by a biologist permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct surveys for DSF. Results of the habitat assessment (Thomas Olsen and Associates, Inc, March 10, 1999, and amended April 1, 1999) and soils survey (Southern California Geological, January 11, 1999) indicated that at least this portion of the site does not contain adequate DSF habitat since there is a lack of actual Delhi series soils present, the site has been disturbed through rough grading practices, and there are no extensive areas of exposed sand. No other unique, rare, or endangered animal species are known to be located on the project site. A Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) has been prepared to determine whether the project will cause increases in vehicle trips or traffic congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use. The CMP/TIA (Transtech Engineers. Inc.. March 15, 1999) concluded that the project will result in excessive future traffic congestion. The report recommends certain roadway and freeway improvements to accommodate the project's generated traffic. A mitigation measure requires the developer to install frontage street improvements in their ultimate configuration, per City Ordinance, and to pay Transportation Development fees for improvements within the City limits and CMP mitigation fees for improvements outside the City limits. The project includes a cul-de-sac street (Street "A") in excess of 600 feet in length; therefore. some form of secondary access to Foothill Boulevard is necessary for fire safety. A mitigation measure requires such access be provided. If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration is in order. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 99-11 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Exhibit "B" - Master Plan Map Exhibit "C" - Activity Center Concept Exhibit "D" - Milliken/Arrow Concept Exhibit "E" - Cross-Sections Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Master Plan Document Exhibit "H" - Design Review Action Agenda dated April 6, 1999 Exhibit "1" - Initial Study Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions SECTION D-D RANCHO CUCAMONGI CORPORATE PARK CONCEPT GRADING PLAN TYPICAL SECTIONS CATELLUS Dfi'ELOPME~T CORPO[&TION -.. ,-.-, ,P~ ""~] 1 Antonio ~ ] .--Texaco StarMart ! '11800 Elm Avenue ~r-----~ t. Vacant' Vacant Project Site I -.-, vacant Vacant Vacant SPORTS PARK t./ Vacafit ANIMAL Si!ELTER AREA USE TO BE, SUB AREA 7 CATELLUS m C Imu~b. vi,=. & Grou,d Covc~ Palette B RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK CONCEPT GRADING PLAN CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION T --u tJ'r T .,PEA R/W R/W RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK CONCEPT GRADING PLAN TYPICAL SECTIONS CATELLUS DEVEffiPRENT CORPORATION CATELLUS Rancho Cucamonga FOR: CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 4000 Westerly Place. Suite 200 Newport Beach. CA 92660 BY: ]~' HOGLE-IREI. AND 4200 Latham Street, Suite B Riverside, CA 92501 Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Table of Contents Page Master Plan Overview ................................................................................1 Site Planning Guidelines .............................................................................6 Development Standards .............................................................................9 Architectural Guidelines ..............................................................................13 Landscape Guidelines ...............................................................................20 Maintenance .............................................................................................29 Sign Program ............................................................................................29 Master Grading Concept Plan ...................................................................30 Master Infrastructure Concept Plan ...........................................................30 Master Drainage / Hydrology Plan .............................................................30 Construction Phasing ....................................................................................33 Review and Approval Process ...................................................................34 Appendix-Landscape Materials ..................................................................35 Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Exhibits Page 1 2 3 4 5 Project Site Setting ...................................................................2 Master Site Plan .................................. .....................................7 Subarea and Activity Center Map ..............................................8 Concept Grading Plan ..............................................................31 Concept Utility Plan ...................................................................32 [Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Master Plan Overview This Master Plan is designed to ensure that an integrated. well planned, high quality environment for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park is accomplished. Based on the goals of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement, this Master Plan provides for orderly development of the project area while maintaining the flexibility needed to respond to changes that may occur over time. A thorough review of the Industrial Area Specific Plan has provided a base of understanding with which the plan is developed. A vocabulary of building shapes and sizes, materials and' textures, landscaping and street furniture with an emphasis on providing identifiers for entry statements, corddor treatments and comer monumentation is included to create a cohesive and unique setting for the Corporate Park. Project Description Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park is an approximate 140 acre development located within the southeast section of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Corporate Park is planned to contain industrial facilities and a commercial element, with possible office, R & D, and recreational uses that will complement its surrounding environment while providing distinguishing characteristics that will benefit the City. Project Location Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park is situated along both sides of Milliken Avenue, bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the north and Arrow Route to the south. The Epicenter abuts the property to the east. The project site is located within portions of Subareas 7 and 8 of the City's IndustrYal Area Specific Plan, with Subarea 7 encompassing the northern portion of the site and Subarea 8 covering the remainder of the Corporate Park. The Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park is delineated on Exhibit 1. ]~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page I t ,Texaco StarMart Medical Center 11800 F~thlll Boalevans . '1~ . · t ~mV~' -,~ ...... ~:.~' ~" ~' '~:'~ 'B' ~-."' Meridian Eucalyptus Street I 1190 White BIrch Drive BlIP ( ated Steel ( 11200 Arrow Route J'f(,' Project Site SPORT3 PARK ..,.e_ ANIMAL SHELTER N EXHIBIT 1 - PROJECT SITE SETTING ~ Rancltn Cucamonga Corporale Park il~lasler Plait Page 2 Surrounding Land Uses To the north, across Foothill Boulevard, the property is vacant. To the south, across Arrow Route. the property is primarily vacant with a few industrial buildings (including KOT). To the east, are the Masi Retail Center and recreational facilities (Epicenter). To the west, across the railroad tracks, the property contains industrial buildings. Exhibit 1 shows the properties surrounding the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park. Purpose, Authority and Intent of Master Plan The Industrial Area Specific Plan establishes that the purpose of Master Plan requirements is to provide for integrated development throughout the Industrial Area at the earliest possible time in the review process. A conceptual Master Plan is required in conjunction with development proposals to assure integrated development, enhance harmonious and orderly development, mitigate site constraints, and maximize land potential. The area of Master Plans will be determined by logical planning boundaries and site conditions. Master Plans shall address harmonious site plan relationships and the potential for shared access and reciprocal parking by illustrating conceptual building pad locations, circulation and parking lot configurations, and conceptual grading and drainage. Future development may be allowed to vary from the Master Plan, provided the proposed project is compatible with the intent of the Master Plan and satisfies all development requirements within the Land Use category. It is the intent and purpose of this document to provide a comprehensive set of development regulations and guidelines consistent with the project land use, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Genera/Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. To the extent that the development and design standards in the Master Plan are specifically intended to replace other regulations, guidelines, policies and ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the provisions contained in this Master Plan shall apply. All other City requirements, regulations, guidelines, policies and ordinances not addressed by this Master Plan remain in effect. The Master Plan is adopted as policies by resqlution of the Planning Commission. Following adoption, this Master Plan will constitute the legally established development guidelines for properties within the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park. Development plans or agreements, tract or parcel maps, conditional use permits, development/design reviews and any other action requiring ministerial or discretionary approval within the Master Plan area shall be consistent with the Master Plan as approved and adopted by the City. H Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 3 Master Plan Framework The Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan is intended to serve as a guide for development within an overall framework directed toward achieving consistency with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement. The Master Plan will specify overall design criteria while allowing for individual design and development requirements of specific projects. It is not the intention of the Master Plan to 'cast future development patterns in stone.' Future development may be allowed to vary from the Master Plan as long as the proposed project is compatible with the intent of the Master Plan and satisfies all development and design guideline standards. Master Plan Revisions In order to ensure that the Rancho Cucamonga Master Plan is kept current, the Master Site Plan, which is conceptual by design, will be revised to reflect actual development of sites as they are approved by the City. The Master Plan revision process will be concurrent with the individual site entitlement process. Other components such as the Landscape Plan Concepts, Master Grading Concept Plan or Master Infrastructure Concept Plan will not be updated in the Master Plan because the basic concepts will remain the same. These individual elements will be submitted with the development plans for entitlement of each site. Industrial Area Specific Plan The Industrial Area Specific Plan provides objectives, standards and guidelines for development in the industrial area in an efficient, orderly and attractive manner. These overall guidelines and standards have been incorporated into the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan. The specific requirements for the two subareas that cover the site have also been considered in the establishment of the guidelines for the Master Plan. Subarea 7 - This is directly south of Foothill Boulevard which represents an important land use edge between the City's Industrial Area and a' large master planned community to the north. Foothill Boulevard is the City's primary commercial corridor and serves as a gateway to the City. Along Foothill Boulevard, the intersections at Haven, Milliken, and Rochester Avenues have been designated as activity centers to promote concentrated activity and establish a unique design theme. Buildings are allowed to be located closer to the street right-of-way and strong pedestrian links between sites are provided. Subarea 8 - This area functions to provide for General Industrial activities and to assure for a transition area from the Heavy Industrial category located south of this subarea. North of Arrow Route and west of Milliken Avenue, the industrial uses should be allowed to continue and expand with all service according to the development standards of the plan. These large-scale building sites are more self-contained, with a strong emphasis on the streetscape design linking the individual sites together. E/g ~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 4 Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement (to the Industrial Area Specific Plan) The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan did not cover all areas of the thoroughfare, including the vicinity of the Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue intersection, which is included in the project site. The Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement to the Industrial Area Specific Plan is intended to extend the concepts of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan to the areas that were not covered in the original plan. It is the objective of the Foothifl Boulevard Specific Plan to create a dynamic boulevard that is attractive and contains development of high quality with an emphasis on the human scale through the use of pedestrian areas and walkways. The intent is to establish a unifying design image reflective of the community heritage and identity, in an economically viable setting. The goal of the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement is to create a community im age that expresses and enhances the unique character and identity of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no existing buildings or landscape features located at the Milliken activity center intersection. As a result, the Development Review process will establish the design theme and concept for the area when reviewing the development proposals. Adjacent new developments need not duplicate the architectural style of previous submittals but should be compatible in terms of architecture and orientation with the other corners of the intersection. The Master Plan accomplishes these objectives by providing a theme element at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Components of that theme element carries over to the streetscape features and into the building sites to provide a unifying identification for the Corporate Park. H Rancho Cucarnonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 5 Site Planning Guidelines The site planning criteria for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park is envisioned to create a visually stimulating atmosphere that will establish a strong identity for the Corporate Park while coordinating well with the design elements of existing development in the area. Exhibit 2 delineates the Conceptual Master Site Plan for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park. Site Layout Sites should be designed to be visually appealing and feature interesting attributes. Building and parking layout will create opportunities for pedestrian orientation, landscaped areas containing monumentation adjacent to streets. areas within the sites containing hardscape features, and safe and efficient vehicular movement on site and between sites. Subarea 7Features - A Bubble Diagram is included for Subarea 7 (Exhibit 2). The purpose of the Bubble Diagram is to demonstrate potential development patterns without providing a conceptual site plan. The size of the individual development is allowed to vary greatly in order to maintain a flexibility to achieve compatibility with the established uses to the east (Masi Retail Center and the recreation facilities). Discussed development for this area has focused on specialty retail and restaurant, office, R & D, and recreational-type establishments. The intent is to create a pedestrian-friendly environment with human scale architecture, along with a pedestrian and vehicular circulation system that internally and externally ties sites together. Focal points such as the Milliken Activity Center and major entry drives into sites will contain art work or have enhanced architectural features on the buildings. Given that Subarea 7 is a Bubble Diagram at this point. the access drive from Foothill Boulevard to the cul-de-sac (Street A) is not defined. When this area is developed, particular attention will be given to designing the access drive to discourage through-truck traffic without creating a bottleneck situation. Also, signage stating that through-truck traffic is not allowed should be installed where appropriate. Phase I of Subarea 7 is the development of the Lowe's Home Center site, a long with two restaurant pad sites. This initial phase will be designed to integrate with the various possible future uses to the east through the use of landscape and hardscape materials, and continuation of pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns towards the adjacent parcels to the east. This phase will be submitted with a Conditional Use Permit to allow the building contain 135,000 sq. ft. Subarea 8 Features- The Subarea 8 portion of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park (Exhibit 2) has a conceptual site layout included with the Master Plan. Industrial Distribution Centers will be the mainstay of development in this area. Sites will be designed to enhance the architectural features of the buildings and landscaping will p~ovide a unifying effect to the area. Pedestrian circulation will be focused within the streetscape portions of the area, where landscape and hardscape features will be incorporated. Subarea Division Line With this Master Plan, the division line between Subareas 7 and 8 is established at a line that projects east and west along the cul-de-sac street located south of Foothill Boulevard, as identified in Exhibit 2. ]~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan ' Page 6 i C,ITELLU$ SU~AREA, 7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK EXHIBIT 2 Page 7 IP CATgLLUS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK EXHIBIT 3 - SUBAREA AND ACTIVITYCENTER MAP I Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 8 Development Standards Table 1 summarizes the site .plan development standards for properties to be located within the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park. These standards are part of the IndustrialArea Specific Plan and the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement, For the detailed guidelines for the various site standards, please refer to the Industrial Area Specific Plan section referenced in Table 1. City Codes and Policies All applicable City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code requirements and policies shall be adhered to in the development of the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park unless specified as an exception within this Master Plan. Exceptions Subarea 8 Driveways: All driveway approaches will conform to Standard Drawing 101 Type C except for truck driveways in the Subarea 8 portion of the Corporate Park. Those driveways will be a maximum of 60 feet wide. with a maximum radius of 45 feet. Permitted and Conditional Uses Following is a list of uses allowed in the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park. The uses are identified by Subarea and correspond to those allowed in the Industrial Area Specific Plan, Permitted Uses Subarea 7 Subarea 8 Administrative and Office Administrative Civic Services Automotive Rental Building Maintenance Services Business Supply Retail Sales and Services Business Support Services Communication Services Cultural Custom Manufacturing Financial. Insurance, and Real Estate Services Flood Control/Utility Corridor Hotel/Motel Light Manufacturing Light Wholesale, Storage and Distribution Medical/Health Care Services Personal Services Professional/Design Services Research Services Restaurants Administrative and Office Administrative Civic Services Agricultural/Nursery Supplies and Services Automotive/Light Truck Repair-Minor Automotive/Truck Repair-Major Building Contractor's Offices and Yards Building Maintenance Services Building Supplies and Light Equipment Sales Business Supply Retail Sales and Services Business Support Services Collection Facilities Communication Services Custom Manufacturing Financial, Insurance, and Real Estate Services Flood Control/Utility Corridor Laundry Services Light Manufacturing Light Wholesale. Storage and Distribution Medical/Health Care Services Medical Wholesale, Storage and Distribution Personal Services Professional/Design Services Public Storage Recreation Facilities Repair Services Research Services Restaurants ]~[ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 9 Conditional Uses Subarea 7 Automotive Sales/Leasing Automotive Service Station Automotive Service Courl Convenience Sales and Services Convention Center Day Care Facility Entertainment Fast Food Sales Food and Beverage Sales Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Recreation Facilities Religious Assembly Restaurants with Bar or Entertainment Schools Specialty Building Supplies and Home Improvement Subarea 8 Animal Care Automobile Service Court Automotive Fleet Storage Automotive Service Station Convention Centers Day Care Centers Entertainment Extensive Impact Commercial Fast Food Sales Food and Beverage Sales Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial Medium Manufacturing Personal Services Petroleum Products Storage Processing Facilities Public Assembly Public Safety and Ulility Services Religious Assembly Schools Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 10 Table I , DeveloPment Standards Minimum Parcel Size MInimum % of Landscape Area (% of Net Lot Area) Performance Schedule Streetside Setback Requirements Average Landscaping Parking Building ~h~Rear property Line Setback Requirements Average Landscaping parking Building 1 acre 1/2 acre 2 acres 15% 12% 15% Class A rASP Development Standards Part III, Sectjon IV. H 45 feeU 25 leet for iocal streets 25 feet/15 feet for local streets 45 feet/25 feet for local streets 45 feet/25 feet for local streets 25 feet/15 leet for local streets none/5 feet if abuts street Class B IASP Development Standards Part III, SecUon IV, H NotApplicable 45 feeU 25 feel for local streets 25 feet/15 feet for local streets 45 feet/25 feet for local streets 25 feet 25 feet 45 feet average, 30 feet minimum 45 feet/25 feet Ior local streets 25 feet/15 feet for local streets none/5 feet il abuts street 45 feet/25 feet for local streets Adj. to Res: 15 feet/Adj. to Comm: 5 feet Adj. to Res: 25 feet/Adj. to Cornre: 0 feet Inferfor SIde Property Line Setback Requirements Average Landscaping parking Building 45 feet/25 feet for Io¢31 streets 25 feet/15 feet for local streets 5 feet 45 feet/25 feet for local streets 25 leet/15 feet for local streets 5 feet 45 feeU 25 feet for local streets Adj. to Res: 15 feet/Adj. to Comm: 5 feet Adj. to Res: 25 feet/ Adj. to Comm: 5 feet Table 1 - Development Standards ...................... . .. Height Limitations 35 feet - i~ over. 1 ~t addi~onal 35 feet - if over, 1 f~t addi~onal setba~ f~ ea~ I f~t over 35 [eet se~a~ f~ ea~ I f~t over 35 feet 35 feet Parking & Loading Requirements IASP Development Standard Pad III. Section IV, F IASP Development Standard Part til. Section IV. F IASP Development Standard Pad III. Section IV. F Signs Lighting IASP Development Standard Part Ill. Section IV, A-2 & 3 IASP Development Standard Pad ill, Section IV. A-4 "Maximum Height: 15 feet for commerctal uses; 25 feet for Industrial uses IASP Development Standard Par1 III, Section IV, A-2 & 3 IASP Developmenl Standard Pad III, Section IV, A-4 IASP Development Standard Part III, Section IV, A-2 & 3 IASP Development Standard Part , Sectjon IV, A*4 Equipment Screening StorageArea/Screening Securffy FencesllYalls Uti~ties Maintenance IASP Development Standard Pad III. Section IV, A-5 IASP Development Standard Pad II1. Section IV, A*6 IASP Development Standard Part III. Section IV, A-7 IASP Development Standard Part III, Section IV, A-8 IASP Development Standard Part III, Section IV. A*g IASP Development Standard Pad III. Section IV, A-5 IASP Developmenl Standard Pad III. Section IV, IASP Development Standard Pad . Section IV, A-7 IASP Development Standard Part III, Section IV. A-8 IASP Development Standard Pad Ill. Section IV, A-9 IASP Development Standard Part III, Section IV, A-5 IASP Development Standard Part til, Sectio~ IV. A-6 IASP Development Standard Part III, Section IV, A-7 IASP Development Standard Pad III. Section IV, A-8 IASP Development Standard Part III, Section IV. A-9 Architectural Guidelines Sites and buildings will be designed to blend with and complement surrounding land use and architecture. As indicated in the Industrfal Area Specific Plan, climate, physical setting and Southern California architectural traditions will be considered when sites are being developed. Since there are no existing buildings located at the Milliken Activity Center, there is no pre-set architectural flavor established for this area. New development will not duplicate the architectural style of buildings in the vicinity, but will be compatible in terms of street orientation and architectural quality. Note: In each guideline section, guidelines for the entire Corporate Park are listed first, with any specific guidelines for Subarea 7 and 8 subsequently listed, if required. Building Street Orientation O Building orientation will consider vehicular, transit, and pedestrian pattems. o Building orientation will consider opportunities for wind protection. H Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Parlc Master Plan Page 13 'Subarea 7 Features At the Milliken Activity Center, buildings may be placed at or adjacent to the front setback line in order to create an active streetscape, At the Milliken Activity Center, buildings should be designed to avoid a fragmented, strip commercial appearance and should be odented to the Activity Center. At the Milliken Activity Center, building entrances should be designed to accommodate logical pedestrian access from the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way through the use of direct entrances from the street, separations in the buildings that allow access to the intedor plaza areas, or other appropriate methods, Subarea 8 Features Buildings should have increased setbacks from abutting property due to their greater intensity, size and mass, Rancho Cztcamonga Corporate Park Master Plait Page 14 Building MassinglGroupincj 0 Building placement will create opportunities for plazas or other landscaped open spaces which allows adjacent sites to connect visually and physically. Multi-story buildings will relate to the peclestdan I sca,e. - i Views and solar - . .:';. access of adjacent" ...... ,...~:.....:.; .. ".'~.~. ....~ ,:_,I! . i -.~ ': buildings should , ~:.....-,~;;.;:~}~;.~.,.:.~a.~.,:.,...... -_ -_- -..-' .,_.--.',... .~ the lecatio, and -,.: massing of ' - - ' buildings. -,-. Building configuration and placement should create defined areas that may be adequately secured. Subarea 7 Features 0 Architecture and outdoor spaces at the Milliken Activity Center should be designed and oriented toward the pedestrian experience. c, Structures will be laid out to ensure ease of access to adjoining sites in a safe manner. Subarea 8 Features Buildings should be laid out to allow for adequate screening of truck yards, Office entrances should be located to allow for easy and safe access to the street parkway pedestrian circulation system. ]~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 15 Building Facades Exterior wall elevations of buildings will provide articulation through the use of openings and recesses, providing opportunities for texture and shadow patterns. At ground level, exterior wall elevations of buildings will contain a variety of materials, textures, color and/or building form in order to provide relief to blank building walls. Ground floor facades will be different from second story facades through the use of different materials, recesses, fenestration and other appropriate architectural features. Colors, materials, and finishes shall be coordinated in all exterior elevations of buildings to achieve a total continuity .of design. Building materials, colors. and textures will be compatible with adjacent buildings. Subarea 7 Features At the Milliken Activity Center, multi-story buildings should be designed to relate to the pedestrian experience. All ground story facades should be designed to relate to the human scale. Appropriate signature architecture is allowed for retail and restaurant uses. H Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 16 Subarea 8 Features Large expanses of exterior wall elevations of buildings should contain articulation through the use of accents, reveals, texture, openings, recesses and other appropriate design features. Architectural Details c. Unifying architectural details for buildings, monumentation, street furniture and hardscape features will be used to give a cohesive look to the corporate park. Signs will be architecturally integrated with the building design. o Secudty lighting fixtures will not project above the fascia or roof line of the building. All lighting will be shielded to confine light spread within the site boundaries. Subarea 7 Features Human scale street-oriented architectural details should be provided. Subarea 8 Features Employee patio areas designed to incorporate '~"'~"~'"'" building architectural details should be provided. H Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan ' Page 17 Streetscape Monumentation Major Street Intersections Corporate Park monumentation identification, landscape and hardscape features will be used to identify the site. Each major intersection within the Corporate Park will contain similar treatment of monumenta- tion, landscaping and harriscape features. Art work will be incorporated into the southeast corner of the Milliken Activity Center (Foothill Boulevard @ Milliken Avenue) to serve as a major focal point for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park. The design chosen for the Milliken Activity Center will serve as the master plan for all four corners at this location. ]~ Ranclto Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 18 Driveway Entrances Primary driveway entrances into individual sites will incorporate the use of enhanced landscaping, special paving and bardscape features that identify primary entrances into a site. Secondary driveway entrances will incorporate similar features used for the primary driveways, but in a moderate fashion. Subarea 7 Art work or enhanced architectural features on buildings are desirable at major entry drives leading into sites. Street Right-of-Way Light fixtures and their structural support will be architecturally compatible with the surrounding buildings. Free-standing light standards will not exceed 25 feet, or the height of the shortest on-site building. All lighting fixtures along Foothill Boulevard will be consistent and in keeping with the Foothill Boulevard design theme. Hardscape features should be consistent throughout the Corporate Park and designed to be compatible with buildin9 architectural features. ~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 19 Landscape Guidelines Integration of individual sites within the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park will be achieved through the various landscaping elements proposed in the Master Plan, specifically landscape materials and hardscape features. These elements will unify the Corporate Park into a cohesive environment, while still allowing for individual site identity through the use of enhanced theme elements and architectural details. Project unification will be further enhanced through the development of a pedestrian circulation system utilizing a meandering sidewalk design within landscaped parkways. Within the Subarea 7 (northern) portion of the Corporate Park the focus will be on pedestrian scale orientation of buildings by situating them closer to the street at key intersections, and designing for closer siting of buildings along Foothill Blvd. Pedestrian links between the various sites will:be provided as well. The Foothill Boulevard theme will be carded out through this portion of the corridor along with art work or enhanced architectural features located at major drives into sites. The Subarea 8 (southern) portion of the Corporate Park is designed for larger industrial distribution type buildings and will focus less on site-to-site pedestrian links, and use the street parkways to create pedestrian circulation. The design of the Milliken Activity Center will create a focal point for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park and continue the high quality of landscaping established along Foothill Boulevard. Landscape Zones Primary landscape design concepts should consider streetscape, on-site landscaping, special accent treatment and pedestrian amenities. Streetscape and Site Landscaping Street trees of similar species will be used to establish a consistent design pattern within the parkways of streets adjacent to and within the Corporate Park. {} Tree groupings will be used to screen undesirable views and to enhance building elevations. Trees, shrubbery and berming will be used to provide screening of parking areas from the street. E' "5, ~. ~[ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 20 Canopy trees will provide shading for pedestrian areas and parking lots. Planting clusters should assume a non-uniform arrangement. Diversity of plant materials in consideration of massing types should be great enough to provide interest but kept to a level with evokes a relaxed, natural feeling. Hardscape features such as benches, light standards, trash receptacles, etc. will be coordinated with the overall site design. The Milliken Avenue median will be developed in accordance with the established landscape and hardscape plan for the street. Subarea 7 Features o Hardscape features, pedestrian pathways and landscaping shall be incorporated within the site so as to ensure ease of access from'one site to adjoining sites in a safe manner. Art work or enhanced architectural features are desirable at major drives into sites. Subarea 8 Features o Employee patio areas and access to the street parkway pedestrian circulation system will provide landscape/hardscape features that coordinate with the overall Corporate Park design theme. The boundary line adjacent to the Epicenter will contain a fifteen (15) foot landscape buffer to be incorporated with a screening wall/fence element, ~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 21 Special Accent Treatment Color accents, specimen tree planting, decorative rockscape, and pavement details will provide visual enhancement to street intersections, driveway approaches, pedestrian walkways, and building entrances. Cola' Aamab/Accat PieaM O A simple, uncluttered lanciscape edge will be established at the base of buildings. Pedestrian Amenities A pedestrian circulation system, along landscaped areas and open spaces will be incorporated into each site. This will provide for a safe and orderly transition of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Sites adjacent to the Milliken Activity Center will have direct pedestrian access to the right-of-way. o Open spaces will provide pedestrian walks. Outdoor eating and sitting areas for employees will be provided as described above, '~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master P/an Page 22 Corner Treatments Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue The landscape theme chosen for the Milliken/Foothill intersection will serve as the master plan for all four corners at this location. Building orientation will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage with building setback areas containing enhanced pedestrian zones with special hardscape materials. formal landscaping and pedestrian level lighting. Streetscape elements such as bollards, crosswalks with special paving materials, light standards. and street furniture will be uniform within the Foothill Boulevard corridor. ~ Rancho Cucatnonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 23 FOOTHILL The Activity Center theme will continue along Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue to a point of transition beyond the first ddveway in each direction from the Activity Center. Planrings will consist of formal treatments, dominated by Crape Myrtle with a backdrop, of Bottle Trees and Sweet Gums on Milliken Avenue and a backdrop of London Plane and African Sumac trees on Foothill Boulevard. Purple Leaf Plums will be used as a transition accent tree between the Milliken Activity Center streetscape and the suburban parkway streetscape. The type and location of these species should be reviewed in conjunction with specific development proposals. Suburban Parkway Streetscape Beyond the Milliken Activity Center streetscape on Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue, and the entire length of Arrow Route, meandering sidewalks through hermeal tuff and informally arranged tree groupings will be used in the streetscape portion. The street trees on Foothill Boulevard will be a combination of African Sumac and London Plane. O The street trees on Milliken Avenue will be a combination of Sweet Gum and Bottle Tree. The street trees on Arrow Route will be Sweet Gum. The meandering sidewalks will be curvilinear and will change grade periodically to provide variation. ~Z~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 24 Major Street Intersection Unifying landscape features will be used to identify the site. ~Patking/C~ Tt~e ~ S~ Legend Tuff :.. :. Turf {'~ Each major intersection Within the Corporate Park will contain similar treatment of landscaping. a In order to achieve a uniform landscape theme, the areas within the street medians, park strips, and landscape setbacks will have an established landscape materials palette consistent with the City's established landscaping theme. Landscaping materials should be selected for their longevity, drought tolerance, low maintenance, and heat and wind tolerance in addition to their aesthetic beauty and functionality. ]Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 25 - Driveway Entrances Pdmary driveway entrances into individual sites will incorporate the use of enhanced landscaping, along with special paving and hardscape features that identify primary entrances into a site. Plantings will consist of accent trees to complement the designated streetscape. The type and location of these species should be reviewed in conjunction with specific development proposals. Secondary driveway entrances will incorporate similar landscape features used for the pdmary driveways, but in a moderate fashion. With respect to landscaping, driveway entrances shall comply with the City's Engineering Division Driveway Policy. Line-of-sight concerns shall be addressed at ddveway locations. Color Palette All street furniture, light standards, bollards, and similar hardware within the Corporate Park will be painted in a color scheme chosen as the Corporate Park theme. Sign faces may vary and match related architecture. .- BuildmI 'S _Covrn ~, in Raised Planmr/Sign Sa: Sheet L3 fe~ FIc,va~ F~,,p,-~',,y Line Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Moster Plan Page 26 Plant Materials The Street Tree Requirement Form lists the required species and spacing for trees along Milliken Avenue, Foothill Boulevard within and between Activity Centers, and Arrow Route. This form also lists criteda for design and construction notes for installation of street trees. The landscape plant materials chosen for sites within the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park will be selected from the list within the Industrial Area Specific Plan Section III, Part IV, E, specifically item 5 of Table 111-5. The Street Tree Requirement Form and the Industrial Area Specific Plan Table 111-5 are included in the appendix section of this document. Irrigation Water conserving plantings and irrigation will be used in all landscaped areas. c- All landscaped areas shall be served by an automatic underground irrigation system. Walls/Fences/Screening Security Fences and Walls All walls and fences will be designed to be architecturally compatible with the site building and provide an overall unifying effect for the Corporate Park. Any wall or fence along a street frontage over 3 feet in height is subject to the streetscape setback requirements, All walls and fences will be incorporated with the site design through use of architectural detail, color, and landscaping. Security gates are subject to review and approval by the Fire and Sheriff Departments to ensure adequate emergency access. ]~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan ' Page 27 Subarea 8 Features Property abutting the Epicenter (eastern edge of the Master Plan area) will be screened with a combination of solid masonry walls and wrought iron fencing. Solid masonry sections will screen truck yard areas and wrought iron sections will be opposite the extedor walls of the buildings to allow the architectural features of the building to provide relief and interest in the screening wall. Afifteenfootlandscapedbufferwillbeincorporatedwiththe design of the screening wall/fencing. Equipment Screening All roof, wall, and ground mounted equipment will be screened from public view on all sides in a style consistent with the architectural and/or landscape theme of the Corporate Park. Screening will be architecturally integrated with the building design. Where possible, a roof parapet wall will be used to screen roof or wall mounted equipment. Equipment will be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Storage Area Screening Subarea 7: No outdoor storage except for fleet vehicles and light trucks not exceeding 6,000 Ibs. Outdoor storage tanks are allowed at a height not to exceed 8 feet from the highest finish grade when screened from public view, Subarea 8: All materials, supplies. equipment, and operating trucks will be stored within an enclosed building or screened area from .public view. Utilities o All existing and new utilities 12 KV and less within the project and along adjacent major arterial will be installed underground. All ground mounted utility appurtenant such as transformers will be located out of public view, preferably in a side yard, and screened from public view. ]~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 28 Maintenance Property owners are responsible for the maintenance of all buildings. structures, yards, landscaping, signs, parking areas, and other on-site improvements. The following conditions are not allowed: Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures, such as: roofs, walls, windows, doors, fences, signs, or similar items. Scrap lumber, junk, trash, or debris. Abandoned, discarded or unused objects' or equipment, such as vehicles, machine parts, pallets, steel drums, boxes, scrap metal, waste materials, or similar items. Stagnant water. Any device, decoration, design, structure, or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or its in,appropriate location. All landscape areas will be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a health. growing condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing. and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material will be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. Sign Program A sign program will be prepared for the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park and inserted into the Master Plan once approved by the Planning Commission. All signage for the Corporate Park will be designed and installed in accordance with 'the Industrial Area Specific Plan development standards. ~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 29 Master Grading Concept Plan The Master Grading Concept Plan provides the preliminary grading engineedng for the Corporate Park. Line-of-sight issues as defined in the City's Engineering Division Driveway Policy and Street Design Policy will be addressed at the time of development of each site. Exhibit 3 delineates the conceptual Grading Plan. Master Infrastructure Concept Plan The Concept Utility Plan provides preliminary engineering information for water and sanitary sewer service to the Corporate Park. Storm drainage information is also included on this plan. Exhibit 4 delineates the Concept Utility Plan. Water System Water mains in Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route will provide service to the project site. Along Milliken Avenue, a 12 inch water line will feed individual sites with 8 inch, 10 inch and 12 inch connections. Along Arrow Route, a 16 inch water line will feed individual sites with 10 inch and 12 inch connections. Sanitary Sewer System Sanitary Sewer mains in Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route will provide service to the project site. Along Milliken Avenue, an 8 inch sewer line will serve individual sites with 6 inch and 8 inch connections. Along Arrow Route, an 8 inch sewer line will serve individual sites with 6 inch and 8 inch connections. Master Drainage/Hydrology Concept Plan The drainage concept plan for the project site will provide the required level of protection from flooding. As it currently exists, the site surface drains from north to south along agdcultural furrows. Additionally, rainfall runoff enters the site from the north through a storm culvert which crosses under Foothill Boulevard. Over time this runoff has cut a swale which crosses the site bearing to the southwest, eventually draining onto Milliken Avenue where it is intercepted by an existing storm drain inlet 500 feet to the south. This storm drain continues south on Milliken Avenue to Arrow Route, then turns to the east along Arrow Route, continuing past the project site's easterly proper~y line. Existing storm drain laterals have been stubbed to property along Arrow Route. A detention basin exists on the project site in the southeast portion of the project area (currently in use as a golf driving range). This captures a large portion of the on-site runoff. Improvement of the project site will require additions to the existing storm drain system in order to eliminate the need for the detention basin. As the project is developed, the existing storm drain laterals will be extended to the north as dictated by building and parking lot layout. Additionally, the existing storm drain in Milliken Avenue will be extended to accommodate the drainage. Exhibit 4 contains preliminary engineedng for the storm drainage coverage for the Corporate Park. ~[ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 30 IT CATELLUS G~sJ~~ ~z EXHIBIT 4 Page 3 1 J."'7'_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK CONCEPT UTILITy PLAN CATELLUS Construction Phasing Milliken Activity Center - Landscape and hardscape right-of-way improvements at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue will occur when the first site is developed. At the pad site, located immediately at the intersection, 'improvements will be made once that pad site is developed. The Activity Center landscape plan indicates the phasing of this portion of the project site. The southwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue will be improved with landscape and hardscape improvements at the time that site is developed. Streetscape Improvements - As individual sites are developed, the appropriate streetscape improvements will be installed. Along Foothill Boulevard, the entire Corporate park streetscape frontage improvements will be installed with the development of the first site in Subarea 7. The median improvements will also occur with the development of the first site. Along Milliken Avenue, the development of the first site will include total streetscape improvements at the site frontage, as well as installation of sidewalks and street trees along the remaining portion of the Milliken Avenue parkway, on the side of the street the project is located. The remaining landscape and hardscape features will be installed in conjunction with the development of the individual sites. The streetscape features on the opposite side of the street would occur in similar fashion. With the development of the first site fronting Milliken Avenue, the entire median improvements will be installed. Along Arrow Route, there are two sites proposed, one on either side of Milliken Avenue. With the development of each site, the streetscape for that portion of the north side of Arrow Route will be improved. Infrastructure Improvements - With initial Milliken Avenue improvements, the backbone infrastructure for water, sanitary sewer and drainage will be installed. Individual feeder lines for water and sanitary sewer will be installed as sites develop. As the project is developed, the existing storm drain laterals will be extended to the north as indicated by building and parking lot layout. Individual Site Development - As stated in the Master Plan Overview section of this document, the Master Site Plan, which is conceptual by design, will be revised to reflect actual development of sites as they are approved by the City. The Master Plan revision process will be concurrent with the individual site entitlement process. The other components within the Master Plan, such as the Landscape Plan Concepts, Master Grading Concept Plan, Master Infrastructure Concept Plan, or Master Drainage/Hydrology Concept Plan, will not be updated with the development of each individual site since the overall concepts will not be altered. Specific site requirements for each of these elements will be addressed during the entitlement process for individual site development, under the guidelines established by this Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan and per the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Standards and all Code requirements. ]~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 33 Review and Approval Process Projects within the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park require approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission in accordance with the development criteria and standards established by the City's Development Code, Industrial Area SpeciFic Plan, and Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement. The owners/lessees of each project are required to implement all provisions of'these standards as applicable to their specific project. All architectural plans, landscape plans and graphic designs shall comply with City standards and with appropriate City, State and Federal laws. Detailed and specific requirements for project reviews by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are explained in the 'Check List for a Commercial or Industrial Design/Technical Review' package. This form, available from the City Planning Department, specifies filing requirements, filing fees, plan preparation guidelines and requirements. For individual site entitlement, Permitted Uses will follow the City's Development Review Process and Conditional Uses will follow the City's Conditional Use Permit Process. As the individual entitlements are processed, the Master Plan Site Plan will be concurrently revised with a separate Development/Design Review Process application. In the event that the Master Plan requires a major revision, the Development/Design Review Process will be followed, with appropriate revisions to individual concept plans within the Master Plan, as well as additional environmental documentation, if required. ]~ Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park Master Plan Page 34 Appendix Landscaping Materials List from Industrial Area Specific Plan and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Street Tree Requirement Form ]~ Rancho Cttcamonga Corporate Park Mas'ter Plan Page 35 CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM DATE: 2-17-99 TO: BETFY MILLER, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: LAURA J. BONACCORSI, RLA, ASSOCIATE PARK PLANNER PROJECT: DR 99-11 - CATELLUS LOCATION: 140 ACRE MASTERPLAN S/O FOOTHILL, E AND W/O MILLIKEN DESIGN NOTES: 1. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME, 2. STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMI'FI'ALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 3. INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEGT STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTH-SOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST. WIND-PRONE AREAS MAY BE REQUIRED 'TO UTILIZE A MORE DECII )UOUS PALE]rE. 4. INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY. WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ON-SITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION. ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED. 5. PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE FOLLOWING NOTES AND APPLICABLE INFORMATION ON THE LEGEND BELOW. CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR STREET TREES: ALL STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARD PLANS. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PLANTING, AN AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE CITY INSPECTOR. ANY UNUSUAL TOXICITIES OR NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES MAY REQUIRE BACKFILL SOIL AMENDMENTS, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. ALL STREET TREE ARE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION. STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED PER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS ONLY. STREET MILLIKEN AVE. - SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOTANICALNAME 30% LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA. MIN. OF 8' PLANTING AREA REQ'D. 70% BRACHYCHITON POPULNEUS MIN. OF 5' PLANTING AREA REQ'D. COMMON NAME SPACING SIZE QTY SWEET GUM 25' O.C, MIN, 15 ? INFORMAL GAL GROUPINGS ° BOI'I'LE TREE 25' O.C. MIN, INFORMAL 15 GROUPINGS ° GAL FOOTHILL BLVDo - ACTIVITY CENTERS NON ACTIVITY CENTERS - NOT MORE THAN 25% OF TOTAL FRONTAGE TREES - MAJORITY IN R.O.W. NON ACTIVITY CENTERS - THEME TREE MUST BE BEHIND THE RO.W. PER CALTRANS LAGERSTROEMIA (INDICA x FAUREI) 'MUSKOGEE' MIN. OF 8' PLANTING AREA REQ'D. NCN 15' D.C. 15 GAL TRIANGULAR MIN, 24"BOX SPACING MAX 15 RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC INFORMAL GAL. GROUPINGS, 20' D.C. LONDON PLANE TREE PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 15 SPACE PER ON- SITE PLANS -30' GAL. D.C. SUGGESTED. ARROW RTE, LIQUIDAM8AR SI'YRACIFLUA SWEET GUM 25' D.C. -REQUIRES 15 MIN. 8' WIDE P A. GAL. 'PALO ALTO' LINEAR PLACEMENT ON ALTERNATING WIDE SIDE OF MEANDERING WALK' · l'~ IF THERE IS INADEQUATE ROOM IN FRONT OF WALK, LOCATE 4' MIN. BEHIND SIDEWALK, ON ON-SITE PLANS IF NEEDED .? APPROVED STREET TREES ~_~,ege,nd: .... e._._ _de,,nOteS__.evergreen .... ~ .__.denotes deciduous I 2' to 4' Planting Areas I 5' to 7' Planting Areas Cercis occidentalis Brachychiton acerifolius Western Redbud - 20' O.C. 1: Australian Flame Tree - 30' O.C. Brachychiton populneus · Dotlie Tree - 25' O.C. Eriobotria deflexa Bronze Loqual Tree - 25' O,C. Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrlle - 20' O.C. Magnolia grandiflora 'St. Mary' NCN - 20' O,C. Prunus blireiana NCN - 20' O..C. Pyrus betulaetolia 'Paradise' Dancer Flowering Pear - 20' O.C. Pyrus calleryana 'Aristocrat' NCN - 20' O.C. Pyrus calleryana 'Bradford' Bradford Pear - 20' O.C. Eucalyptus polyanthemos .1: Silver Dollar Gum - 30' O.C. Eucalyptus rudis · Swamp Gum - 35' O.C. Eucalyptus slderoxylon 4: Red Ironbark - 35' O.C. :t: Eucalyptus nicholii Nichors Willow-baled Pel~oeminl - 25' O.C, Geijera parviflora Auslralian Willow - 20' OoC. Ginkgo biloba 'Fairmount' Maidenhair Tree - 35' O.C. Plstacla chinehats Chinese Pislache - 30' O.C. Quercus ilex Holly Oak - 40' O.C. Rhus lancea African Sumac - 20' O.C. Sophora japonica Japanese Pagoda Tree - 30' O.C. Pyrus kawakaml Evergreen Pear- 20' O.C. FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA Revised November 25, 1998 ~ 8"+ Plantinq Areas ~ Celtis sinensis 4: Chinese Hackberry - 30' O.C. .1: Cinnamomum camphora · Camphor Tree - 30' O.C. · Eucalyptus camaldulensis · Red Gum - 30' O.C. · Eucalyptus maculata · Spoiled Eucalyptus - 25' O.C. · Koelreuteria bipinnata · Chinese Flame Tree - 35' O.C. .1: Koelreuteria paniculata · Goldenrain Tree - 35' O.C. :1: :1: Llquidambar styraciflua American Sweet Gum - 25' O.C. Llqutdambar styraciflua 'Festival' NCN - 25' O.C. Llquidambar styraciflua 'Palo Alto' NCN - 25' O,C. Llquidambar styraciflua 'Rotunditoba' NCN - 25' O,C, Magnolia grandif Iota · Soulhern Magnolia - 30' O.C. Pinus canariensis :1: Canary Island Pine - 25' O,C. Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree - 30' O.C. Platanus racemosa Calilornia Sycamore- 35' O.C. Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak - 40' O.C. Quercus suber Cork Oak - 40' O.C. · · .1: :1: · · ~' (~ Quercus virginiana Soulhern Live Oak - 40' O.C. Induso-ial .~rea S~eci~c PI~ Parr HI. Section IV TABLE 111-5 LANDSCAPING MAY1E, HIALS CONCEPT LOCAT1ON 5. Parking tots commercial centers. of A tme's -htlity tO provide Round-he~dad. sl~e~dlng shade and to ream heat is e~en3men tm~=, 35' - 50' t~lL essentjaJ for its use a a paddng lot tree, Trees at entrks may be deciduous and/or columnar, Tm used to designate the ent~/to a paddng lot should be different from the trees lining ~a stmat. PLANTING PROVISIONS AND TREAll~EIfI' Sffipsbotv~mrowsdpLqdng stmlll: pllntmri Ihould e3d:end into a p~tdng mu occ~lionilly to b~ up the I~'atgMroMm. Tn~plaotadm dtstanceoflO'ks~Umn~e center, A suffictam nm of shag ha planted mc~h that when they me fnatumd will shade 50 ~ of ~e parking am at mr noon on August 21 (1 p.m. Daylight Savings time). Thisre, at a minimum, plaotmg tme~ at · e required ~oaang sums between ~ sta~. REPRESENTATNE SPECIES Prunus Sp~de~ Flowering Ceratoni, sffiaua. Camb Clnnamomum carnohom. Camphor Flcu~ fublalncPJi. Ruaty Led Fig Sc~tnus tefebh~hffolius. 8rm:ilm Pepper Ulmu~ oanvifofia. Chinese FJm DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Brent Le Count April 6, 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-11 - CATELLUS - A request to establish a master plan for the development of the "Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park," a 140-acre commercial and industrial complex in Subarea 7 (industrial Park) and Subarea 8 (General Industrial) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, including a sho0ping center anchored by a home improvement store, to be located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Related files: Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, Conditional Use Permit 99-04 (Lowe's), and Tentative Parcel Map 15295. Proiect DescriDtion: The Master Plan covers approximately 140 acres and may include more than a dozen buildings. The Master Plan area takes access off Foothill Boulevard to the north, Arrow Route to the south, and Milliken Avenue runs through the site from north to south. A new cul-de-sac street is proposed to intersect the east side of Milliken Avenue near the dividing line between Subareas 7 and 8. A 66-foot wide private drive aisle is proposed to connect Foothill Boulevard with the cul-de-sac bulb. The northeast corner of the master plan area is planned to have research/development and office/industrial uses. but no specific building locations have been determined. A Lowe's home improvement store is proposed at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. A separate Conditional Use Permit application will be processed for the Lowe's building on Parcel 5. Other uses proposed include warehouse, office, and restaurant. Three large (400,000 square foot plus) warehouse buildings are proposed in the south portion of the Master Plan area. Two of these buildings have recently been submitted for design review (GATX) on Parcels 11 and 13. Desiqn Parameters: The site is split ,between Industrial Park (Subarea 7) on the northern third of the site and General Industrial (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The light industrial (Subarea 7) is intended to function as a transition zone between the medium industrial area to the south and commercial/retail development to the nodh. The City adopted the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement (see attached) to establish special street scape design features which "tie" together the visual aspects of this important corridor. The intersection of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard is designated as an Activity Center. Certain features are required for Activity Centers such as formal hard scape and landscape treatments. reduced building setbacks from the street, and pedestrian orientation. The Design Supplement includes a schematic Activity Center concept plan. which provides an example of how these elements can be designed. The applicant is proposing a design for the Activity Center which incorporates these elements but is a departure from the adopted Activity Center design. Note Major Issue 1 below. Backqround: The Planning Commission held a Pre-Application Review Workshop on the project on January 13. 1999. Concerns raised by the Commissioners included ensuring intensity of landscaping/screening along street frontages (especially Milliken Avenue). interface with the City's Adult Sports Park/Epicenter and Masi Plaza (the Master Plan provides for a 15-foot landscape swath and screen walls along the stadium site). large container truck traffic circulation, and articulation of building facades. The Commission indicated that depadure from the established Activity Center concept schematic is acceptable so long as all four corners of the intersection at Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard are addressed. See attached minutes. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The proposed "theme element" Activity Center design for the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard includes public art, raised planter/project identification monument signs, F_ DRC COMMENTS DR 99-11 - CATELLUS April 6, 1999 Page 2 7-foot decorative planters pots, and special tree planrings. The Activity Center also includes a unique paving pattern consisting of a 12-foot wide, grid patterned, earth toned main field with a flush, 4-foot wide natural concrete sidewalk meandering throGgh it. In addition to considering the merits of the applicants proposed design scheme, the Commission should discuss, as a policy matter, how much flexibility should be allowed from the adopted Activity Center design. Design variations have been allowed in several projects, such as Foothill Marketplace, Masi Plaza, and Terra Vista Promenade. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: The main north-south drive aisle connection between Foothill Boulevard and the cul-de-sac bulb shall be designed to prevent truck traffic from using that route to access industrial buildings. This could be accomplished through limited turning radii/driveway offsets, the use of "no truck access" signs, traffic channelization, or a combination thereof. Jacaranda trees are proposed as accent trees framing driveway entrances and elsewhere. Unfortunately, Jacarandas have not been found to hold up to seasonal high winds. Suggest replacing with another type of accent tree such as Crape Myrtle (which is used in the Activity Center landscape treatment). 3. Consider provision of public art .pieces in areas other than the Activity Center such as plazas. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: The Master Plan Architectural Guidelines shall include a provision for use of two primary exterior building materials, consistent with Planning Commission Industrial Area Design Policy (Resolution 89-158). 2. The Master Plan Architectural Guidelines shall include a provision that all equipment, both ground- and roof-mounted, shall be completely screened from view of surrounding streets. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the project subject to the above comments. Attachments: Exhibit "A" ~ Minutes of January 13, 1999, Planning Commission meeting Exhibit "B" - Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement Exhibit "C" - Resolution No. 89-158 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Brent Le Count The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project and recommend approval subject to staffs comments with the following additional items: The use of Jacaranda trees is acceptable so long as they are used very sparsely and interspersed throughout the project. DRC COMMENTS DR 99-11 - CATELLUS April 6, 1999 Page 3 The proposed Activity Center design is acceptable so long as it sets an exceptionally high standard/precedent. Staff to review the proposal in detaiL prior to the Planning Commission meeting to determine that all Activity Center criteria, other than the schematic design, are included. Applicant shall provide an exhibit that more clearly reflects the ;proposed design. Truck access can be limited through the use of signs for the nodh south driveway connection between the cul-de-sac bulb and Foothill Boulevard (northeast corner of site). Inclusion of art pieces throughout the project raises the overall quality of the project. Provide clearly defined locations for Planning Commission review. The applicant agreed to all of staffs concepts and direction from the Committee. missloner Stewart agreed the commercial area should be retained. She advised the deve take a dose look at loading noise issues and look carefully at slopes and grades between uses. . Commissioner McNiel expresse ceres with the natural shod- rough the tract by unwanted traffic. He agreed with Commis r Mannedno r ng the combination of side-on and rear-on residential to commercial and thoug ' i~ues could be worked out. He felt the commercial center should be retained. Mr. Bullet noted that this may b ' to look towards the future freeway; however . Mr. Buller concluded there is mittee Review proc . PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 98-11 - CATELLUS - The proposed master plan for the development of "Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park," a 140 acre commercial and industrial complex in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7) and General Industrial (Subarea 8) Districts of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and including a shopping center anchored by a home improvement store, to be located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Brad Buller, City Planner, explained the purpose and goals of the Pre-Application Review process and indicated that due to complexity of the project. extra time would be provided for the meeting. Pamela Steele, the applicant's planner, introduced the Catellus development team. reviewed the basic aspects of the master plan. and outlined what they hoped to accomplish at the meeting. Chades McPhee, Catellus representative, reviewed the anticipated land uses and the nature of how Catellus develops land. Chades, Lamb. the project landscape architect, reviewed the landscape and street scape design intent to unify the master planned development. Dennis Hill, project architect. reviewed the integration and mix of architectural design features throughout the project. Don Winn. Lowe's representative, briefly described the Lowe's style of business, operation. and size requirements. Brent Le Count. Associate Planner. indicated that staff's comments would be presented in accordance with the outline provided by the applicant. He observed that locating the district boundary between Subareas 7 and 8 along the proposed public street is consistent with the flexibility built into the Industrial Area Specific Plan and makes good planning sense. Given that land uses within the northeast comer of the master plan area are the least defined. he asked the Commission preference on how development in this area relate to Mast Plaza. Foothill Boulevard, and the Lowe's buildings. He observed that loading areas for the Lowe's project and rail spur served industrial buildings should be carefully treated given the proximity to Milliken Avenue. He questioned how the large industrial building at the southeast corner of the master plan relates to PC Adjoumed Minutes .,E January 13.1999 the Quakes Stadium. Mr. Le Count indicated that staff is supportive of having the buildings designed to respect their usage rather than attempting to convey an industrial flair. He suggested hard scape, street scape, and landscape elements could unify the planning area. He thought industrial buildings fronting Milliken Avenue should have significantly upgraded architecture. He observed that the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard is a designated Activity Center per the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP) and the master plan design for the intersection is different from the FBSP design. He suggested the master plan should include a design for the north side of the intersection since what's done on the south will establish a theme for the north. He remarked that industrial buildings to the south will create a draw for large container truck traffic through the northeast comer area. He recommend significant restudy of Lowe's architecture, because he felt it appears to be a hybridization of industrial and retail architecture resulting in something that fits into neither category. He suggested relocating the garden center to the east side of building, or at a minimum, designing it to be completely architecturally integrated with the building. He observed that signature architecture for pad restaurant buildings is acceptable and consistent with Mimi's Caf~ and Applebee's architecture; however, if a fast food drive-thru user is anticipated, that should be shown now with the master plan. He remarked that the main drive aisle entry to the Lowe's center has no formal defined focal point destination. Commissioner Mannedno felt that the Lowe's building should not be designed with an industrial flair, that it should be designed to be what it is. He thought the eventual land uses for the northeast comer area should not be totally left to market demand but should be nailed down as much as possible now. He favored having the rail spur served building within the industrial portion even if it means having truck loading fronting Milliken Avenue. He also preferred commercial development on Foothill Boulevard instead of industrial t Commissioner Macia s echoed Commissioner Mannerino's comment about commercial uses being appropriate along Foothill Boulevard. He expressed concerns about circulation and that the main entrance to Lowe's center should have a formal destination/entry statement. He said the design should avoid long stretches of uninterrupted building walls for industrial buildings fronting Milliken Avenue. He expressed concern with how the project relates to Quakes Stadium. given that a large industrial building is shown designated with truck loading along the east side. Commissioner Stewart indicated that she does not wish to see significant areas of parking fronting onto Foothill Boulevard. She concurred regarding entry points to the Lowe's center and said the main entry should be enhanced. She preferred the garden center be relocated so it would be less prominent relative to street frontages. She did not favor the use of perforated metal features as a building matedal for the Lowe's building or garden center. She preferred a softer design for the Activity Center at Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue as opposed to a more urban, formal treatment. She thought employee eating areas, benches, bus shelters. and other pedestrian- fdendly amenities should be used extensively to facilitate usage of the project at a pedestrian level. Commissioner Tolstoy supported locating the subarea district boundary along the proposed public street. He commented that retail uses along Foothill Boulevard are appropriate. as are signature pad buildings. He suggested that the Lowe's project be carefully designed to facilitate customer exiting for customers purchasing large and bulky items such as lumber, similar to the way Home Depot at Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard is designed. He preferred that rail served buildings be located in the industrial portion with truck loading fronting Milliken Avenue if the loading areas are effectively screened. He thought parking along Foothill Boulevard is acceptable so long as berrning and landscaping provide an adequate buffer. He favored retail uses for buildings in the northeast comer area if the market will bear it. He felt the large building in the PC Adjourned Minutes -5- ~: '~'<~ January 13, 1999 southeast comer area can be buffered from the Quakes Stadium. He thought it may be best to relocate the garden center to be less visually prominent relative to street frontages; otherwise, significant screening and des!gn features will be necessary. Chairman McNiel asked about anticipated uses for the northeast comer area. Mr. McPhee responded frankly that they are just not sure, that retail may not be feasible given the retail drain caused by the Mills project. He said that he has lined up interested industrial users for the buildings to the south but that he has not yet seen a retail or office interest in the northeast comer area buildings. He said the intent is to simply demonstrate potential building massing in the northeast area of the plan. Commissioner Tolstoy interjected that he would not wish to see development proposals come in for review in a piecemeal fashion, He also stressed the need for including public art wherever possible. Chairman McNiel indicated that the Lowe's building should not be designed with an industrial flair, that it's design should be consistent with its retail use. He stated retail development along Foothill Boulevard should be designed to be user friendly, warm, and comfortable and restaurants are encouraged. He concurred that the subarea boundary should be located along the proposed street. He commented that landscaping along the Milliken Avenue corridor should be as lush as possible. He felt the Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue intersection street scape design should not have to follow the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Activity Center concept and felt the pedestrian aspect of the Activity Center isn't appropriate. He cautioned the applicant to be sensitive to the interface between the proposed area and Mast Plaza and Quakes Stadium to the east. Chairman McNiel felt the master plan is a great idea and he welcomed Lowe's to the City. Mr. Buller asked for clarification on how the Commission felt about having a north-south connection through the northeast comer area, per Engineering recommendations, given potential for truck traffic through the area. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, indicated that a connection could occur between the proposed cul-de-sac and Arrow Route instead of Foothill Boulevard. He said that the cul-de-sac exceeds 600 feet in lenglh and therefore does not meet Fire Safety access requirements. Chairman McNiel indicated that he would not wish to see large container truck traffic through the northeast comer area of the plan. The other Commissioners agreed. Mr, Bullet asked the Commission whether they would be in favor of allowing this master plan to proceed forward and only show access points for the northeast corner of the project; thus deferring Planning Commission review of building location, size, shape, uses, and architecture to a later date. Commissioner Tolstoy indicated he would not object to such an approach so long as an architectural pallet for the area is defined. Mr. Buller summarized the meeting: highlighting previous issues raised by Mr. Le Count and noted that there appeared to be consensus that signature architecture is acceptable for the pad buildings with the Lowe's center; only one median island break will be allowed on Foothill Boulevard; having the district boundary happen along the proposed public street is acceptable; the industrial portion of the master plan is to remain flexible in terms of specific building size, shape, and location; and PC Adjourned Minutes -6- ~ ''~<:~ January 13, 1999 finally, that an Industdal Area Specific Plan text amendment will be necessary to accommodate the Lowe's project. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments, ADJOURNMENT Motion: The Planning Commission adjourned at 12:25 a.m. Respectfully submitted. Secretary PC Adjot~rned Minutes -7- January 13. 1999 III. DESIGN GUIDELINES A. ACTIVITY CENTERS: Activity centers are selected intersections along the Foothill Boulevard corridor definccl as "Thcme" or "Sta~ment" areas which "tie" together the visual aslx'cts of the Foothill Boulevard corridor through the city, promote concentrated activity at tJ~se areas, and give identity and theme to the areas in which they are located. The activity centers are localed contiguous to Foothill Boulevard as indicated in Figure 2. ACTIVITY CENTERS FIgure 2 - Activity Center Locations Because tinge comers of the Haven Avenue intoneorion are fully or partially developed, the devel- opment provis/ons of the activity center are limited to thos~ strutscape and landscape improvements within the public right-of-way. Therefore, many of the following standards apply only to the MilIiken Avenue and Rochester Avenue activity centers: 1. Streetscape: a. All building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage. The building setback areas will be enhanced pedcstrian zones with spedal harriscape materials, formal landscape arrange- ments, and pedestrian Icvel llghting. b. Streetscape elements such as boliards, c~osswalks with spedal paving materials, light standards, and street furniture should be uniform throughout the Foothill Boulevard corridor. c. The concept within the activity center is to incorporate a formal, regularly spaced, sircot tree planting systcm utilizing a palette oir informally shaped, colorful trccs. d. The urban or formal streetscape design characteristic of the activity center should extend along Foothill Boulevard and secondary/intersecting streets to a point of logical transition to the suburban parkway. Typically, the design will extend to at least the tint driveway or as modified through the design review process. The extent of ~e urban streetscape should he able to adjust to changes in public right- 'conditions, such as right mm lanes and bus bays. ?/91 SIte Planning: a. At activity centers, buildings may be placed at or adjacent to the front setback line to c~,ate a more appealing, active streetscape. Front yard areas of parking lots dominating the streetscene are specifically prohibited. b, Multi-story buildings shall be designed to relate to the pedestrian level, All ground story facades shall be designed to relate to the human scale. This can be accomplished through the breaking of facades into hays and the s/gnage brought down in size and location. Further, this reduction in scale can be established through the use of denruts which add horizontal articulation to the facades. Examples of these elements include pedestrian arcades and awnings. (Milliken & Rochester only.) c. Buildings shah be designed to eliminate a fragmented, strip commercial appearance and should be oriented tu the activity center (Milliken & Rochester only). d. Architecture and outdoor spaces along Foothill Boulevard shall be tntegrally designed and oriented toward the pedestrian experience. The experience should be visually diverse and stimulating and should include activities that create a sense of variety and interest (Milliken & Rochester only). e. Structures, pathways, and landscaping shall be incorporated wi thin the site so as to ensure ease of access from one site to adjoining sites in a safe manner. f. Building entrances shall be designed to accommodate logical pedestrian access from the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. This may include direct entrances from Foothill Boulevard, separations in the buildings that allow access to the interior plaza areas, or other appropriate methods. 3. Architectural Concept: a. Within individual activity center, the architectural style should be consistent to provide continuity of design at the intcr~-'ction. 1. Milliken Activity Center - There are no existing buildings located at the Millikcn activity center intersection. As a result, the Development Review process will establish the flavor for the area when reviewing the development proposals. New developments need not "duplicate" the architectural style of previous submittals but must be compatible in terms of architecture and orientation with the other comer(s) of the intersection. 2. Rochester AcUvity Center - New proposals shall consider and respect the architectural style of existing buildings. For example, the Aggazzotti Winery at the southeast comer of Footh/ll and Rochester, is a potential National Historic Registry candidate. Any proposals for this activity center should.be designed to be compatible with this structure. This does not mean that new proposals must emulate the architectural style of the winery but, rather, that they must complement existing buildings. b, Differentiate the ground floor facades from the s~x:ond floor in recognition of the differences in the character of activities at the gn:mnd floor level. Ezamples include, but are not limited to, the use of storefront glass, stepped-hack or tiered forms, fenestration, and other appropriate architectural features facing Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and Rochester Avenue. 4. Innclseape C, orlcept: The activity centers shall be distinguished from suburban (informal) parkway areas through the use of formal, urban tree planrings. These formal plantings shall border all activity centers and shall define these a.reas as being higher intensity, urban districts. The plantings shall consist of an offset double row of C. rape Myrtle (Lagerst~oemia indica) trees along each road frontage. Addi- tional plant materials ( evei~:julm canopy I='ees, palms, etc.) may be introduced to supplement the C. rape Myrtle as a backdrop. The type and location of the additional materials should be based on the particular buiding design, scale, and setback. C ./ FIgure 3 - Activity Center Concepts/Examples Foothill Botdevard Specific Plan Part III. Section 8 8.3.2 Activity Center/Intersection Concept All building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage as much as practicable. The 25 foot buildin9 setback areas will be enriched Pedestrian zones. with special hardscape materials, formal landscape arrangements (see illustrative Site Plan), and pedestrian-level lighting. Other streetscape elements such as bollards, crosswalks, and street furniture should assume a decidedly village oriented theme of earlh-tone colors and warm materials such as stained wood, river rock, black wrought iron, and textured stucco. Two activity centers exhibit some slight modifications to the concept described above. Bear Gulch Village activity center will exhibit a less formal, more natural setting while the Etiwanda activity center will be similar in appearance to the Foothill BoulevardNineyard Avenue intersection. The concept wil be ess pedestrian meaning less harriscape materials, plazas, and furniture and more turf. landscaping, and betms. The concept within the activity center area is to ncorporate a formal, regularly spaced street tree planting system utilizing an informally shaped. colorful street tree palette. The trees are to be planted 30 feet on center and are to be placed between 2 to 5 feet inside the property line. The activity center/intersection concept urban streetscape design shall extend the full length of the design plan priority areas along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. At the cross streets. the design shall extend at least as far as the first ddveway north and south on the cross streets. The extent of the urban streetscape design may be modified through the design review process in order to adjust for local public right-of-way conditions and ensure a logical alignment of similar features on opposing sides of the street. 111-15 4/96 Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Part Ill. Section 8 ACTIVITY CENTEPJINTERSECTION CONCEPT 4~96 RESOLUTION NO. 89-158 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING DESIGN POLICIES FOR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS REQUIRING ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AND CREATIVE USE OF BUILDING MATERIALS WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AREA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has expressed design concerns with painted tilt-up concrete industrial buildings, as they lack variety, have inadequate architectural treatment, increase maintenance, and create dated building design and previous projects have not adequately addressed the design concerns; and WHEREAS, there is a need to establish a design goal to' guide future development; and WHEREAS, design policies are necessary to expound and implement the established urban design guidelines and standards of the Industrial Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, such design policies are needed to provid~ clear direction and guidance to developers and staff alike. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby establish design policies for the additional architectural treatment and creative use of building materials as follows: SECTION 1: Goal Statement The intent of the design policies is to assist the designer in understanding and complying with the Urban Design Guidelines and Standards of the Industrial Specific Plan. The goal is to ensure high quality and timeless building design, which includes building entry focal point, sufficient articulation to building plane, and the creative use of building materials. These design policies expound the established Urban Design Guidelines of the Industrial Specific Plan and shall apply to all industrial buildings within the Specific Plan area. SECTION 2: Design Criteria Desirable architecture shall project a high quality, progressive, sophisticated style of development. Variations in architectural style, construction methods and materials are encouraged. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT December 13, 1989 Page 2 89-158 All building entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entrance statement through variations of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscape plazas, as well as relate to pedestrians. The articulated building entrances, together with the landscape plazas, should be designed to relate to and connect with the area-wide network of open space, thus, unifying and fostering a sense of community. The degree of architectural treatment and embellishments must relate to the scale and mass of the building. Accent treatment, such as changes in exterior materials and texture, is required. The creative use of building materials is required. . A minimum of two (2) primary building materials shall be used. The recommended primary and secondary building materials are as follows: o Primary building materials - concrete, sandblasted concrete, textured block, brick, granite, marble, and similar materials as approved by the Design Review Committee. o Secondary building materials glass, tile, polished brass or copper, brick, concrete, painted metal elements, painted accent stripe, and other materials as approved by the Design Review Committee. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1989. · ~ a rdrry uTcN~ ATTEST: ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review 99-11 2. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit 99-04 - Lowe's Home Improvement Store 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-11 - CATELLUS - A request to establish a master plan for the development of"Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park," a 140 acre commercial and industrial complex in Subarea 7 (Industrial Park) and Subarea 8 (General Industrial) of the Industrial'Area Specific Plan, to be located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15295 - CATELLUS - A subdivision of 140 acres o1' land into 13 parcels in the Industrial Park (Subarea 7)and General Industrial (Subarea 8) Districts of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Hogle Ireland Inc 4200 Latham Street, Suite B Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 787-9222 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park and General Industrial Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 7) Industrial Area Specific Plan, General Industrial (Subarea 8) Industrial Area Specific Plan Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Vacant land and the Rancho San Antonio Medical Center to the North, industrial buildings to the west and south, and the Masi Plaza shopping center and the Epicenter sports part to the east. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-11 - Catellus Page 2 10, Contact Person and Phone Number: Brent Le Count (909) 477-2750 Other agencies whose approval is required: A Traffic Impact Analysis has been completed for review by SANBAG ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Population and Housing (v') Geological Problems (v') Water ( ) Air Quality (v') Transportation/Circulation (v') Biological Resources ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Hazards (V') Noise ( ) MandatoP/Findings of Significance (V') Public Services (v') Utilities and Service Systems (v') Aesthetics ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (v) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Initial Study for DR 99-11 - Catellus City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards. and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, Signed: Brent Le Count, AICP Associate Planner April 6, 1999 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact." "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. LAND c) d) USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.' Conflict with general plan.designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? Comments: () (). () (v) () () () (v) () () () (v) a) The project proposes to align the boundary between Subareas 7 and 8 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan lISP) with a planned east-west cul-de-sac. This alignment is slightly different than that shown on the subarea, maps of the ISP; however. the Plan allows for realignment of land use district boundaries. Initial Study for DR 99-11 - Catellus City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) (v) ( ) (v) () (v) GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) Fault rupture? Seismic ground shaking? Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? Seiche hazards? Landslides or mudflows? Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? Subsidence of the land? Expansive soils? Unique geologic or physical features? Comments: h) () () (v) () () (v) () () (v) () () (v) () () (v) () () (v) () () (v) () (v) () () () (v) According to Figure V-5 of the General Plan, the site contains Tujunga-Delhi soil association which "may have soil bearing capacities that could limit some development. Structures proposed on this soil type should be permitted only after a site specific investigation has been performed that indicates the soils can Initial Study for DR 99-11 - Catellus City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 adequately support the weight of the structure." A soils report will be required prior to issuance of permits for individual buildings within the Master Plan area. The impact is not considered significant. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) b) c) Changes in absorption rates, drainage'patterns. or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? d) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? g) h) i) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g.. temperature. dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? Changes in currents, or the course or direction water movements? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by culs or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? Impacts to groundwater quality? Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: () ( () ( () () () () () () () (~) () () (1) ) (¢) () () () () (¢) () () (¢) () () (~) () () a) The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and hard scape proposed proposed. All runoff will be conveyed to approved drainage facilities which have been designed to handle the flows. No other improvements beyond the master plan of drainage are necessary to accommodate the project. The impact is not considered significant. E Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-11 - Catellus Page 6 AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.' a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) No () () (v) () () (v) () () (v) () () (v) No TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) (v') () b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? () () (v) c) d) e) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) (,/) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) () ) (v) ) (v) 0 Conflicts with adopted policies suppoding alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? () () (v) () g) Rail or air traffic impacts? () () () (v) COMMENTS a) A Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) study has been prepared to determine whether the project will cause increases in vehicle trips or traffic congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use. The CMP/TIA (Transtech Engineers, Inc. March 15, 1999) concluded that the project will result in Initial Study DR 99-11 - c) for Catellus City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 excessive future traffic congestion. The repod recommends certain roadway and freeway improvements to accommodate the project generated traffic. The project will be required to install frontage street improvements in their ultimate configuration, per City ordinance, and to pay Transportation Development fees for improvements within the City limits and CMP mitigation fees for improvements outside the City limits. With mitigation, the impact is not expected to be significant. The cul-de-sac street (Street A) proposed to intersect the east side of Milliken Avenue exceeds 600 feet in length. Therefore, a means of secondary access is necessary connecting to Foothill Boulevard. With mitigation, the impact is not considered significant. Bus bays are required along the Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route frontage to comply with the Transit Concept Plan per the City's General PlanL The project design includes appropriate bus turnout lanes and will be conditioned to install bus shelters at the time of development. The impact is not considered significant. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES, Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) b) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: planIs, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? () ( () ( () () () () () () (v) () () (v) () (v) () (v) () (v) Comments: a) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service identifies the project area as potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly (DSF). As a result, habitat assessments and biological surveys will be required to determine potential impacts to the DSF habitat for future development projects within the Master Plan area. A habitat assessment and soils study were recently conducted for the Lowe's Home Improvement store project (Conditional Use Permit 99-04) which covers approximately 5.2 acres at the Initial Study for "DR 99-11 - Catellus City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and MiIliken Avenue by a biologist permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct surveys for DSF. Results of the habitat assessment (Thomas Olsen and Associates, Inc, March 10, 1999, and amended April 1, 1999) and soils survey (Southern California Geological, January 11, 1999) indicated that at least this portion of the site does not contain adequate DSF habitat since there is a lack of actual Delhi series soils present, the site has been disturbed through rough grading practices, and there are not extensive areas of exposed sand. No other unique, rare, or endangered animal species are known to be located on the project site. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES, Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non*renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? () () () () () () ) (v) ) (v) ) (v) HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including. but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with fiammable brush, grass, or trees? () () () (v) () (v) () () () () () (v) () () () (v) () () () (v) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-11 - Careflus Page 9 Comments: b) The cul-de-sac street (Street A) proposed to intersect the east side of Milliken Avenue exceeds 600 feet in length. Therefore, a means of secondary access is necessary connecting to Foothill Boulevard. With mitigation, the impact is not considered significant. 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) ( b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) ( Comments (v) ( ) ( ) (v) a) The project will increase existing noise levels because the site is currently vacant. The increase howeyer. will not be in excess of that anticipated by planned land uses and there are no sensitive receptors existing or planned in the project vicinity. The impact is not considered significant. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) b) c) d) e) Fire protection? ( ) Police protection? ( ) Schools? ( ) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) Other governmental services? ( ) Comments: (v) () () ()' () (v) () () () () () () a) The cul-de-sac street (Street A) proposed to intersect the east side of Milliken Avenue exceeds 600 feet in length. Therefore. a means of secondary access is necessary connecting to Foothill Boulevard. With mitigation. the impact is not considered significant Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-11 - Catellus Page 10 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or suppries or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) b) Power or natural gas? Communication systems? () () (v) () () (v) c) d) 0 g) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solid waste disposal? Local or regional water supplies? () () (v) () () (v) () (v) () () () (v) () () (v) Comments: e) Storm drain improvements will be necessary to accommodate the project. This does not result in substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage. The impact is not considered significant. 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? Comments: () () () (v) () () () (v) () () (v) () c) The project will create new light and glare because the site is currently vacant. DevelopmentJdesign reviews for individual buildings within the Master Plan will include a Standard Condition of Approval which will require the preparation of a photometric diagram to demonstrate that light and glare will not be cast onto surrounding propedies or public rights-of-way, The impact is not considered s,gni~cant. '97 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-11 - Catellus Page 11 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) b) c) d) Disturb paleontological resources? Disturb archaeological resources? Affect historical or cultural resources? Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? NO ) () (v) ) () (v) ) () (v) (v) (v) 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal.' a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? () () () () No (v) 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE, a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? () () () No Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ' DR 99-11 - Catelius Page 12 b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term. to the disadvantage of long-term. environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects. and the effects of probable future projects.) () () () (v) () () () (v) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? () () () EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where. pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (v) General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) (v) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified Januar,/4, 1989) (v) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certitied September 19, 1981) Initial Study f{~ DR 99-11 Calellus bNVIRONMENI'AL MITIGATION MEASURES: Transportation' City of Ra.cho CucamG .......... 17a9e~,,~, 1) The developer shall install frontage street improvements in their ultimate conf'~uralion, per Cdy ordinance. and pay Transportation Development fees for Improveme~.~ Within the C~ty limits and Congestion Management Planrrraffsc Impact Analysis mitli~etton fees for Improvements outside the City limits. 2) An approved secondan/means of access shall be prowdad fo~' Street "A" I0 the satisfaclk)n of the Fire Chief and the, City Engineer. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I ccrtdy that I am the applicant for the project desuibed in this Initiul Study. I 3r..knowledge that I have rt~ad this Initial Study and the pror, x}sed miligatjon measures. Fudhe~. I have revised the pfoJcd pian~ or proposaJs and/or hereby agree to the proposed minealien measure to avoid the etfectu or m;t~gate the offect~ In a point where dearly no slgnfficant enwr0nmental effects would occur. City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review 99-11 & Tentative Parcel Map 15295 Public Review Period Closes: April 28, 1999 Project Name: Project Applicant: Hogle Ireland, Inc. Project Location (also see attached map): Located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route - APN: 229-011-25, 31, and 32. Project Description: A subdivision of 140 acres of land into 13 parcels and a request to establish a 140-acre master plan known as the Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park. consisting of a mix of commercial and industrial development in Subarea 7 (Industrial Park) and Subarea 8 (General Industrial) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identilied potentially significant effects but: O) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where cleady no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public Is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Apdl 28. 1999 Date of Determination RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 99-11, TO ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK, A 140 ACRE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN SUBAREA 7 (INDUSTRIAL PARK) AND SUBAREA 8 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO BE LOCATED ON MILLIKEN AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF-APN: 229-011-25, 31, AND 32. A. Recitals. 1. Hogle Ireland has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 99-11, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of April 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites .pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on April 28, 1999. including wdtten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route with a street frontage of 2,600 feet on Milliken Avenue (each side) and 2,500 feet on both Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route and is presently vacant, abandoned vineyards and the southeasterly portion is improved with a golf ddving range facility; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and developed with a medical building, the property to the south consists of industrial buildings. the property to the east is developed with the Masi Plaza and the Quakes Stadium. and the property to the west is developed with industrial buildings; and c. A Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis has been prepared for the project to determine whether the project will cause increases in vehicle trips or traffic congestion in excess of projections for the adopted land use. The project will be required to install frontage street improvements in their ultimate configuration. per City ordinance, and pay Transportation Development fees for improvements within the City limits and Congestion Management Program mitigation fees for improvements outside the City limits. This will reduce traffic related impacts to a less than significant level; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 9~11-Hoglelraland Apd128,1999 Page 2 d. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service identified the project as potential habitat for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly. Habitat assessments and biological surveys were prepared to determine potential impacts to the habitat for future development projects within the master plan area. A 15-acre portion of the site was surveyed (Thomas Olsen and Associates, Inc, March 10 and Apdl 1, 1999), which did not find adequate Sand Fly habitat since there is a lack of actual Delhi sedes soils present, the site has been disturbed through rough grading practices, and there are no extensive areas of exposed sand. No other unique, rare, or endangered animal species are known to be located on the site; and e. The project includes a private driveway connection between Foothill Boulevard and the proposed east-west cul-de-sac street intersecting Milliken Avenue, which will provide a secondary means of access for fire safety equipment; and f. Storm drain improvements necessary to accommodate the project are not in excess of that provided by the master plan of storm drainage; and g. The project, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and h. The project provides for a coordinated development scheme for a large area of land thereby avoiding potential land use and access conflicts of piecemeal development; and i. The development of the retail/commercial component is consistent with the Industrial Park designation of the Industr a Area Specific Plan, in that it will function as a transition between more intense industrial development to the south and office and retail development to the north. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: and a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distdct in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-11- Hoglel~land Apd128,1999 Page 3 a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and. further. this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits. and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Planninq Division 1) The Master Plan is approved in concept only and does not guarantee building square footage as shown. Future development for each parcel shall be subject to development/design review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. 2) Approval of the subject Master Plan does not waive compliance with any code requirement of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3) All future development within the Master Plan shall provide the minimum number of parking spaces required by code. 4) Biological assessments and surface soils surveys for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly shall be provided with any future development/design review applications within the mapped Delhi Sand soils areas. s) The main north-south drive aisle connection between Foothill Boulevard and the cul-de-sac bulb shall be designed to prevent truck traffic from using that mute to access industrial buildings. This could be accomplished through limited turning radii/driveway offsets, the use of "no truck access" signs, traffic channelization, or a combination thereof. 6) Replace Jacaranda trees with another, more wind resistant, type of accent tree such as Crape Myrtle. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-11- Hoglelreland Apd128,1999 Page 4 7) Provide public art piecesin areas otherthanthe Activity Center, such as plazas. 8) The Master Plan Architectural Guidelines shall include a provision for use of two primary extedor building materials, consistent with Planning Commission Industrial Area Design Policy (Planning Commission Resolution 89-158). 9) The Master Plan Architectural Guidelines shall include a provision that all equipment, both ground- and roof-mounted, shall be completely screened from view of surrounding streets. lo) The driveways connecting to the east side of Milliken Avenue serving Buildings A, B, and C shall have signs conspicuously placed precluding truck access. Enclineerinq Division 1) The center portion of Milliken Avenue shall be completed between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route upon development of the first parcel fronting Milliken Avenue. This will include median curbs. pavement on both sides of the median, and ultimate intersection improvements for Street "A," including right turn lanes. Extend the existing fourth northbound through lane on the east side of Milliken Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard to Street "A" and add a 300-foot dght turn lane for the Foothill Boulevard intersection. This development shall not receive Transportation Development Fee credit forthe backbone system since a City project completed the applicable portion of this segment. Additional conditions are as follows: a) Median landscaping for the entire segment, north or south of Street "A," shall be installed upon development of the first parcel fronting the segment. The median shall be designed consistent with existing medians north and south of the site. b) Sidewalks and all drive approaches (with right tum lanes) on the project side of the street. for the entire segment north or south of Street "A," shall be installed upon development of the first parcel fronting the segment. c) If the right turn lane for Foothill Boulevard is combined with the right turn lane for the drive approach north of Street "A." the total length will be about 550 feet. d) Existing bus bays on Milliken Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard and north of Arrow Route, shall be extended and combined with the right turn lanes for the first respective driveways. 2) Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements including curb, gutter, street lights, a bus bay just east of the Milliken Avenue ECR, all drive approaches (with right turn lanes) and sidewalk, shall be completed PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 9~11-Hoglel~land Apd128,1999 Page 5 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) from Milliken Avenue to the existing terminus west of Masi Drive upon development of the first parcel fronting Foothill Boulevard. Sidewalk on the west side of Milliken Avenue and all off-site street trees may be deferred until development of the adjacent properties. A "street type" driveway will be allowed for the project driveway opposite Mayten Street. If the developer chooses to defer the decision on a ddveway between Mayten Street and Masi Drive (including Caltrans permission therefore) until development of Parcel 7 of Parcel Map 15295, curb and gutter shall be installed in lieu of a drive approach and right turn lane. Construct Street "A" full width and length, including street lights, upon development of any parcel fronting Street "A." Off-site street trees, sidewalk, and drive approaches may be deferred until development of the adjacent properties. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Street "A" upon development of any parcel along Street "A." install a traffic signal at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Street upon development of any parcel utilizing the ddve approach that aligns with Mayten Street. The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. Existing traffic signals at Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard and Milliken Avenue/Arrow Route shall be modified as needed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The project's Congestion Management Program/Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA) identified traffic impacts at six locations, which will result in an unacceptable level of service unless mitigated. The TIA has also determined the amount of this projecrs fair share construction to these mitigations. A cash payment in-lieu of construction as contribution for the following future projects shall be paid, pdor to the issuance of building permits or final Parcel Map approval, whichever occurs first, in the following amounts: Amount Recipient Aclenc¥ Future Project $19,575 City of Ontario Widening Milliken Avenue to four through lanes and right tum lane northbound plus three through lanes southbound and related signal improvements south of Fourth Street $19,247 City of Ontario Widening Milliken Avenue to three through lanes and two right turn lanes northbound and three through PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-11- Hoglelreland Apd128,1999 Page 6 $ 8,430 Caltrans $ 18.085 Caltrans $251,256 Caltrans $195,576 Caltrans lanes and two left tum lanes southbound on both sides of Ontado Mills Road and related signal improvements Additional southbound right turn only lane for 1o15 Freeway off ramp Additional northbound right turn only lane for 1-15 Freeway off ramp Additional northbound lane on 1-15 Freeway between the 1-10 Freeway and Foothill Boulevard Additional southbound lane on 1-15 Freeway between Foothill Boulevard 6) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) An in-lieu fee for one-half the cost of constructing special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City, prior. to the issuance of building permits or final Parcel Map approval, whichever occurs first. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. A contribution in-lieu of construction for the median island in Foothill Boulevard shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits or final Parcel Map approval. whichever occurs first. The amount of the contribution shall be one-half the cost of the median (currently estimated at $60 per linear foot) times the length of the project frontage. Since there are so many driveways proposed along Milliken Avenue, a Special Boulevard, sidewalk easements allowing the sidewalk to meander, shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to I foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. Sidewalks shall cross drive approaches at the zero curb face. Provide additional public right-of-way as needed. Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of-way. All drive approaches shall conform to Standard Drawing No. 101 Type C (minimum width 35 feet, maximum 50 feet, except on Foothill Boulevard opposite Mayten Street) and be perpendicular to the street. Only driveways 50 feet wide can have medians. Driveways on Milliken Avenue shall be at least 300 feet from intersections to minimize weaving problems for traffic exiting fight- turn-only driveways and making a left turn at the nearest signal. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-11 - Hogle Ireland Apd128, 1999 Page 7 15) Truck traffic to Parcels 8, 11, and 13 of Parcel Map 15295 will be required to use Street "A" for access. Milliken Avenue driveways shall be posted with "no truck access" signs. 16) Provide a bus bay on Arrow Route just west of Milliken Avenue. 17) The driveway for Parcel 12 of Parcel Map 15295 shall align with an existing driveway on the south side of Arrow Route west of Milliken Avenue. Provide a right turn lane. 18) The existing storm drain in Milliken Avenue shall be extended concurrent with the street improvements. All stub outs for future development shall be provided at that time. The final drainage report shall also address interim and ultimate requirements for the public storm drain shown crossing Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 15295 on the Conceptual Grading Plan. 19) Manholes shall be provided at each junction between public and pdvate storm drain systems (applies roArrow Route connection), This is not a requirement for private laterals as shown along Milliken Avenue. 20) Provide a 12*foot wide public storm drain easement across Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 15295, if needed. Environmental Mitiqation Measures The developer shall install frontage street improvements in their ultimate configuration, per City ordinance, and pay Transportation Development fees for improvements within the City limits and Congestion Management Plan/Traffic Impact Analysis mitigation fees for improvements outside the City limits. An approved secondary means of access shall be provided for Street "A" to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief and the City Engineer. Fire Safety Division 1) Each Parcel shall have a stand alone fire protection system. 6, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry To McNiel, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-11- Hoglelreland Apd128,1999 Page 8 ATTEST: Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary I, Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of April 1999. by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Development Review 99-11 140 acre master plan HoCjle-lreland/Catellus Both sides of Milliken Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative. to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its'agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attomey's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Completion Oate The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shaft be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. B. Time Limits Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits for buildings within the Master Plan are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. Project No. DRgq-II CompleUon Date C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and gradin9 on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Prior to any use of the project site or business act v ty being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Occupancy of facilities within the Master Plan shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. A revised copy of the Master Plan incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building. etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced. whichever comes first. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code. all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. All ground-mounted utility appudenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, barrain9, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner, For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proofofthis landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pdor to the issuance of buildin9 permits. D. Shopping Centers The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to separate Development/Design Review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the Shopping Center Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction ofthe City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/recreational uses. ' All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn*areund space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motomycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet, Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial. office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0. 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. Project No, DR~q-II Completion Date Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. G. Landscaping Project No. DR9~-II Completion Date / / / / / , , 10. 11. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects. and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. Within parking lots. trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for ever,/three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq: ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site. as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thrMn9 condition, and shall receive regular pruning. fedilizin9, mowing, and tdmmin9. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees. meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard. Milliken Avenue. and Arrow Route. / / / / / / / / Landscaping and irdgation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. if located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. Tr~e maintenance cdteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to issuance of building permits. These criteda shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. Completion Date 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed forthis development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719.00, prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy). the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identity the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code. Uniform Mechanical Code. Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. PnojectNo. DR9~-Ii Completion Date Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. L, New Structures / / Me Roofing material shall be installed as for wind-resistant roof covering at wind velocity not less than 90 mph. __/ / Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the appreved grading plan. / / / / A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Pdvate easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 65-78 total feet on Foothill Boulevard 50-61 total feet on Arrow Route 66.60 total feet on Milliken Avenue 3. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. O. Street Improvements All public improvements (intedor streets, drainage facilities, community trails. paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights. and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & A,C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Foothill Blvd. X X c X X X f Arrow Route X X c X X X e f Milliken Avenue X X c X X X X f Pm.~No. DRgg-H CompleUon Date Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Class II Bike Lane. (f) Post R26 or R26(s) signs and Bike Route signage as required by the City Engineer. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights. and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Secudty shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvate street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnectwiring. Pullboxesshallbeplacedonbothsidesofthestreetat3feetoutside of BCR, ECR. or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Project No. DP, gq-I T CompleUon Date Notes: (1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. / / / / / / / I / / / Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and pavin9, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways: Local residential street intersections and commercial or industdal driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 6. A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: Foothill Boulevard. P. Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Milliken Avenue medians. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of modared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City, Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 3. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system. water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utifity Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San BernardinD. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: all shared drive approaches as shown on the master site plan. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: T. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello RoDs Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. 2. Fire flow requirement shall be 3,000 gallons per minute. X a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. X b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. Completion Date Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants sha be installed, flushed, and operahie prior to deliver,/Of any combustible building materials on site (i.e. , lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a 4-inch and a 2-112-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on appraved brands and model numbers. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, bending completion of the required fire protection system. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. X Other. 1994 UBC. Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage. high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of sprinkler system. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Distdct's fire lane standards, as noted: 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. X All roadways ber Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times during construction. in accordance with Fire District requirements. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. $677.00 Fire District fee(s). and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit issuance. ** A Fire Distdct fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal. Project No. DR9q-H Completion Date / / / / / / ,__/ **Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 16. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC. UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. U. Special Permits 1. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: a. Storage of readily combustible material. b. Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet).Storage of readily combustible material. c. Dust-producing processes and equipment. d. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage. handling, or use). e. High piled combustible stock. f. Liquefied petroleum gas (storage. handling, transport. or use exceeding more than 120 gallons). g. Welding and cutting operations: to conduct welding and/or cutting operations in any occupancy. (9og, .,7-2800, FO. COMP,,A. W,T. V. Security Lighting 1. All parking. common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. W. Security Hardware 1. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. 2. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed. X. Security Fencing 1. When utilizing security gates. a Knox box sub-master system security device shall be used since fire and law enforcement can access these devices. Windows 1. Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. Z. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development, They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. Project No, DR99-1t Completion Date / / / / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 28, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner USE DETERMI NATION 99-01 - CHEVRON -A request to determine that a carwash is similar to other Auto Service Station uses and is a conditionally permitted use within the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. BACKGROUND: Chevron is intending to submit an application for the development of one of the freestanding pads within the Lucky's shopping center proposed at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. The proposed service station project would include vehicle fueling, convenience market, and carwash (see Exhibit "A"). FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN: The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP) currently permits auto service station uses in the Community Commercial. Office, Commercial/Office, and Regional Related Commercial districts in all subareas subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Car washing facilities, either automatic or coin operated, are conditionally permitted in the Community Commercial, Regional Related Commercial, and Office districts of Subareas 3 and 4. When the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan was established. the placement of car washing facilities was specifically excluded from Subareas 1 and 2. That exclusion was directed at carwash facilities where the car washing operation was the predominant use of the facility and not ancillary to the primary use of the project site. The distinction that requires further clarification is when a car washing facility is clearly incidental and ancillary to the primary land use of the project site. As an example, there are two recently completed auto service stations along Foothill Boulevard that contain car washing facilities as an ancillary use. These facilities include the Chevron service station located in the Foothill Marketplace. on the south side of Foothill Boulevard. between the 1-15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue, and the Mobil service station located in the Masi Plaza, at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Masi Drive. In both instances, the carwash and convenience market for the service station are contained in one structure where the car washing facilities occupy 28 and 33 percent of the floor area, respectively. Chevron is proposing a freestanding carwash facility. utilizing approximately 30 percent of the floor area of the primary structure (see Exhibit "B"). ITEM F ' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UD 99-01 - CHEVRON April 28, 1999 Page 2 Staff feels that the proposed use would operate in a manner consistent with an auto service station. The establishment of auto service stations that contain car washing facilities ancillary to the service station would be consistent with those uses often found at service stations. Those facilities choosing to include ancillary car washing operations shall limit the car washing operation to a maximum of 30 percent of the project floor area. The car washing facility could be either an attached or detached facility. Based upon the description of uses presented herein, staff feels it is appropriate to classify a car washing facility as an ancillary use to an auto service station and permitted, where applicable, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Use Determination 99-01 to allow for carwash facilities that are ancillary to the auto service station land use, as permitted in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit, in those districts which permit auto service stations. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:TG:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Land Use Table Exhibit "D" - Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Subarea 2 Map Resolution of Approval March 1.1999 Mr. Dan Coleman Principal Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 RE: Proposed Chevron Service Station # 20-8371, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Dear Mr. Coleman, Based on our meeting at the City of Rancho Cucamonga on 2/2,1/99, I am writing this letter to formally request a Use Determination be mode by the Planning Commission. The above referenced proposed project is to be located within the Lucky Shopping Center currently being permitted at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Chevron's service station project is to include a convenience market, vehicle fueling, and a self-serve canrash. This site is within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Subarea q\vo. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Subarea Two development guidelines specifically prohibit conyashes. However, we are submitting this Use Determination considering that this project is for o service station and the conyash is simply an oncilliary use. I thank you in advance for your prompt attention with regards to this matter. Please contact me should you have any comments or questions or if I may provide additional information related to this matter. Sincerely, Vice President of Operations lVlark Eggimam Chevron Products Company Mike Anglin, Chevron Products Company A'FI'A C I-[ M E N 'P Callfotnl, 2050 Soulh Santa Cruz Ave.. Suite 2100. Anaheim. CA 92805 Adzone 2010 E. Un~versliy Dr. 112. Tempe. AZ 85281 (714) 938.6090 (602) 945-3380 Fax: (714) 938-0105 CITY OF R~ '~CAMONGA ~ON VINEYARD AVENUE Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Part IV. Section 9 SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITTED (P) AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED {C) USES Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI3 O Antique Shops p p p p p p p1 p p Aooarel a) BouUques P p p p p p p p p b) General P p p p p p p p Appliance Stores and Repair P p p p p ArL Music. Photographic SIudlos p p p p p p p p p p2 and Supply Stores C Au{o Service Station C C C C C C C C C Auto Serv~c~ (including trailers. a) Sales (wi~h ancallary repair facilities) P P P P C b) Rentals p p p p p p c} M~nor Repair (does not include major engine work, muffler shops. painting. P P P P P body work. upholstery. elc.) d) Coin-op Washing C C C e) Auloma~ic Washing C C C C t] Pans and Supplies p p p p p Bakeries (te(a,I only) p p p p p p p p p p Bat~er and 8e~uly Shops p p p p p p p p p p p p2 p Bed and Breakfasl C C C C C C C O C B~cycle Shops p p p p p p p p2 Services P P P P P P P P P ~)ook. G,fi and Slallonen/Slores (olher Ihan adult relaled P P P P P P P P P P P P C ) Candy and Confectloneries p p p p p p p p p pz Calerlng Eslabfishmenls P p p p p p p p p China and Glassware Slores p p p p p p p p2 Lots (ooerahng on a temporal/ P p p p Churches C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Cleaning and Pressing Eslabhshmenls P P P P P P P P P P P P C 3 All industrial uses and developmenl $(andards shall be as prowded in Su~area 7 of Ihe Induslrlal Area Specific Plan (ISP) "O 4/97 LEGEND RESIDENTIAl. LEE~J LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL IL'~I Lo,,,-.Eo,uM .ESIDENT,AL Ii'_'ij .ED.UM .ES,DENT,,,L I~,il MEo,u.-.,o. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL c~E'J COMMUNITY CO..ERC,AL R[~,C~ REOIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL OFFICE ['~']COMMERCIAL/OFFICE INDUSTRIAL ~ LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ['~ UTILITY LAND USE PLAN RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI'FY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING USE DETERMINATION 99-01, DETERMINING THAT AN ANCILLARY CARWASH LAND USE IS SIMILAR TO AN AUTO SERVICE STATION USE AND IS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A, Recitals. 1. Chevron has filed an application for the approval of Use Determination 99-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Use Determination is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of April 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is' hereby found, determined. and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on April 28, 1999. including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application contemplates classifying auto service stations that contain ancillary car washing facilities as similar to an auto service station, which is a conditionally permitted use within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b. The ancillary car washing facility would operate in a manner similar to an auto service station and would provide a service consistent with those often found at auto service stations. The applicant proposes to provide a convenience market, vehicle fueling, and car washing facility; and c. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan conditionally permits auto service stations in the Community Commercial, Office, Commercial/Office, and Regional Related Commercial districts. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The use in question has similar operational characteristics and intensity to an auto service station which is a conditionally permitted use in the Community Commercial. Office, and Regional Related Commercial Districts of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. UD 99-01- CHEVRON Apd128,1999 Page 2 b. The use in question meets the purpose and intent of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The Goals of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan include "to create a dynamic concourse that is attractive and of high quality with a unifying community design image, reflective of community bedrage and identity, providing an economically via ble setting for a balanced mixture of commercial and residential uses with safe, efficient, circulation and access" (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Page 11-4.1 ). Additionally, "to develop a specific plan which is sensitive to community land use and fiscal needs" (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Page 11-4.2). The use is adaptable to existing commercial developments along the corridor, without compromise of a design image, and provides a necessary service to further the needs of the community; and c. The use in question meets and conforms to the applicable goals and objectives of the General Plan by providing for commercial activities along the heavily auto-dependent Foothill Boulevard corridor. The use furthers the General Plan land use objectives for commercial activities by "providing commercial facilities to meet the retail and service needs of the community." 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby determines the establishment of auto service stations that contain car washing facilities ancillary to the service station would be consistent with those uses often found at service stations. Those service stations providing ancillary car washing facilities shall limit the car washing operation to a maximum of 30 percent of the project floor area, either detached or attached to the pdmary facility. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry McNeil, Chairman ATTEST: Lawrence J. Henderson, AICP, Acting Secretary I, Lawrence J. Henderson, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of April 1999, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 28, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT POLICY DISCUSSION: At the meeting on April 14, 1999, the Planning Commission discussed various policies (Exhibit *'B") to limit General Plan land use amendments during the process of/he General Plan Update program. The discussion focused on the three staff recommended scenarios as follows: Establish a site-specific moratorium on General Plan Amendments (GPAs) during the entire update process as established by State law. Establish a city-wide moratorium on all GPAs until a draft General Plan Update is endorsed by the City. Following that, allow those GPAs which are consistent with the Draft General Plan to proceed through the amendment process. GPA requests that are not consistent would be denied without prejudice to reapply after the General Plan is formally adopted. The consultant expects to have a draft General Plan ready for City consideration by mid-September 1999. In addition to Nos. 1 and 2, a deadline for land use amendments requested for consideration within/he General Plan Update process should be established. Such a policy may allow for some land use questions to be included and analyzed in the draft General Plan alternatives. Staff recommended a deadline of May 12, 1999, for such proposals and requiring the payment of the established GPA fee plus a consultant time and material fee to cover added General Plan Update costs due to expanded analysis by the consultant. The resultant analysis would be used in formulating alternative land use plans. The Planning Commissioners' discussion focused on use issues as they would be applied to the General Plan Update. Rather than any staff-recommended site specific moratorium, the Commission felt that limiting the amount of commercial land use changes (plus or minus acreage) was one of the key concerns during the update process. After discussions between Planning staff and the City Attorneys office, the City Attorney advised against limiting land use amendments to only specific land use categories. In light of further discussions with the City Attorney, staff again suggests that the Planning Commission consider area-wide moratoriums based on land use issues in specific areas of the City, Since any land use change has the potential to affect neighboring areas regardless of their land use designation, the City may wish to delay formal consideration of any land use changes in areas where commercial development requests are anticipated. Y ITEM G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA UPDATE/POLICIES April 28, 1999 Page 2 There are three designated areas where significant land use redesignation for commercial activities has been discussed: A= The area around the mall site bet~Neen Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard east of the I-15 Freeway and west of Rochester Avenue because of the enhancement of the I-15 Freeway on/off ramps and large amounts of vacant land. Generally, area on either side of the I-15 Freeway from Summit Avenue to Arrow Route, and the area on either side of the Foothill Freeway Corridor from Haven Avenue to the 1-15 Freeway - Staff believes that land adjacent to these very significant transpodation corridors are potentially critical commercial windows to our community and have been subject to land use change discussions in the past, Staff has defined this area as: The area 600 feet west of the Haven/Highland Avenues intersection, east to the 1-15 Freeway, north of the freeway corridor in line with (and east/west extension oo Lemon Avenue, south of lhe freeway corddot in line with Highland Avenue. and The area 2,000 feet west of the I-15 Freeway between the northern City limit and Arrow Route and between Miller Avenue and Foothill Boulevard west of Etiwanda Avenue. The area on the south side of Foothill Boulevard to Arrow Route between the Deer Creek Channel and the 1-15 Freeway - This area, like the two freeway corridors, has been discussed in the recent past and continues to be subject to requests for major land use changes of commercial character, Again, because any land use change has the potential to significantly affect neighboring properties. staff recommends that any moratoriums apply to all land use change requests within the recommended moratorium areas. Finally, staff also suggests that a 10-acre maximum be established on all GPAs not covered by the selected area moratoriums. Hopefully this approach will limit the need roamend the General Plan Update/EIR contract to readjust the costly consultant data qatherinq and analysis. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider endorsing the following changes to the current GPA policies: A designated area moratorium on all General Plan land use amendments, in conjunction with a 10-acre maximum site limitation moratorium in all other areas, as authorized by the State Government Code. The payment of the current GPA fee plus a consultant time and material fee to cover added General Plan Update costs due to expanded analysis by the consultant. 3. This policy is to be applied to all GPA applications not considered complete by May 12, 1999. Any General Plan land use amendment application will be evaluated with the draft General Plan Update (after it receives General Plan Update Task Force endorsement), for compliance with the draft plan's recommended land use policies. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA UPDATE/POLICIES April 28, 1999 Page 3 The Commission's recommendations will be forwarded to the General Plan Update Task Force and ultimately to the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW:Is Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Proposed Moratorium Areas Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 14, 1999 VICINITY MAP Moratorium Areas CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 14, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Alan Warren, AICP, Associate Planner GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT POLICY DISCUSSION: During the General Plan update process, consultants will be gathering information about the community and analyzing potential alternatives and their anticipated impacts. This work, at some point, must be able to develop a preferred alternative for the General Plan Update. Developer initiated General Plan Amendments (GPA) can significantly impact the review and approval process. If these amendments are considered during the General Plan Update they would complicate and fragment the consultant's work products. Attached is a listing of those amendments which are in process and those that staff anticipates may be filed in the near future (Exhibit "A"). Staff recommends that the City consider establishing a policy regarding General Plan Land Use Amendment requests during lhe update process from the following options: Continue to allow GPA applications to proceed as normally scheduled during the City's established GPA cycles. Presently the City has established regularly scheduled cycles for GPA review and action as follows: The 2nd meeting of the Planning Commission in the month of January. The deadline for submittal shall be no later than 5:00 p.m., November 15, of the preceding year. The 2nd meeting of the Planning Commission in the month of May. The deadline for submittal shall be no later than 5:00 p.m., March 15, of the same year. The 2nd meeting of the Planning Commission in the month of September. The deadline for submittal shall be not later than 5:00 p.m., July 15, of the preceding year, One floating date which may be scheduled as necessary by the City Council or Planning Commission. ,/ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA POLICY April 14, 1999 Page 2 Establish a city-wide moratorium on all GPAs during the entire update process as established by State law. Establish a site specific moratorium on GPAs during the entire update process as established by State law. 4. Establish a site specific and acreage limitation (10 acres) moratorium on GPAs during the entire update process as established by State law. Establish a city-wide moratorium on all GPAs until an interim General Plan update is endorsed by the City and then allow those GPAs which are consistent with the Draft General Plan to proceed through the amendment process. GPA requests that are not consistent would be denied without prejudice to reapply after the General Plan is formally adopted. The consultant expects to have a draft General Plan ready for City consideration by mid September 1999. In addition to Nos. 2 through 5, a deadline for land use amendments requested for consideration within the General Plan update process should be established. Such a policy may allow for some land use questions to be included and analyzed in the draft General Plan alternatives. Staff recommends a deadline of May 12, 1999, for such proposals and requiring the payment of the established GPA fee plus a consultant time and material fee to cover added General Plan update d~sts due to expanded analysis by the consultant. The resultant analysis would be used in formulating alternative land use plan(s). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission select from Options No. 2 through 6. Staff prefers Option No. 3, and secondly Option No. 6. Option No. 1 could easily complicate the process of updating the General Plan. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:AW/mlg Attachment:: Exhibit "A" - Pending and Proposed GPA Applications PENDING AND PROPOSED GPA APPLICATIONS (Refer to attached map for locations) Presently there are three GPA's in progress as follows: 1. GPA 99-01 (Medium to Low-Medium) at the northeast corner of Highland and Lemon Avenues has been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and is scheduled for City Council consideration on April 21, 1999. 2. GPA 99-02 (Low to Low-Medium) for 5.1 acres at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue is to be considered by the Planning Commission on May 12. 1999. 3. GPA 98-02 (Medium, Medium-High and Regionally Related Commercial 1o Low-Medium) for 192 acres north of the Victoria Mall site is tentatively scheduled to be forwarded to the Planning Commission in mid-June 1999. These three projects will easily fit into the consultant's draft General Plan and their inclusion should not create any significant difficulties. Staff has had discussion with development representatives on potential GPA applications at the following locations: 4. Office to Commercial at the nodhwest intersection of Haven Avenue and the Route 30 freeway. , 5. Low-Medium to Commercial at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and the Route 30 freeway. 6. Medium to Low-Medium east of the future Day Creek Boulevard on the north side of B~.s.e Line Road. 7. Medium to Low-Medium at the southwest intersection of East Avenue and the I-15 Freeway and Low-Medium to Medium between Etiwanda and East Avenues, north of the commercial land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. 8 Low-Medium to Commercial or Office for land adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway, nodh of the commercial land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. 9. Industrial Park to Low-Medium for about 18 acres south of the intersection of 6th Street and Archibald Avenue adjacent to the existing Griffin residential development. 10. Industrial Park to Residential for land around the golf course at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue. These projects may cause significant difficulties depending on when they are formally submitted. The next Planning Commission GPA cycle is for September 22, 1999 (filing deadline is July 15, 1999), which is after the anticipated completion of the draft General Plan. EXHIBIT "A" Pending and Proposed GPA Applications '