No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/08/25 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY AUGUST 25, 1999 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel __ Vice Chairman Macias __ Corn. Mannerino __ Corn, Stewart __ Corn, Tolstoy __ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 11, 1999 Adjourned Meeting of August 11, 1999 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The foilowing Consent Calendar items as expected to be routine and non- controversial They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion, If anyone has concern over any item. it should be removed for discussion. A, VACATION OF A 6-FOOT WIDE EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGF PURPOSES V-165 - Located between Seventh Sireel and Sixlh Street along the east side of the railroad spur crossing for both 10401 Seventh Street and 10404 Sixth Street - APN: 209-262-16 and 15. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are pubtic hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. P/ease wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shaft be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. P/ease sign in after speaking. B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-39 GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES -A master plan for the development of Planning Area VIII and a portion of Planning Area X of the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue, north of Fourth Street and Seventh Street, r~;spectively - APN: 210-082-48 an 210-272-18. Related files: Tentative Parcel Maps 15350 and 15346. C. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15350 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES - A subdivision of 22.49 acres of land into 9 parcels in the Mixed Use designation of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Sixth Street - APN: 210-082-48. Related files: Development Review 99-39 and Tentative Parcel Map 15346. D. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15346 GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES - A subdivision of 9.2 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Mixed Use designation of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located on the west side of Ariahelm Place and Azusa Court. north of Sixth Street - APN: 209-272-18. Related files: Development ReView 99-39 and Tentative Parcel Map 15350. VI. NEW BUSINESS E. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-35 - ROBERT A. FREIS - A request to construct a 7.549 square foot single family home on .74 acres of land within the gated King Ranch Estates (Tract 10277) in the Very Low Residential District, located at 5073 Earl Court -APN: 1061-791-09. Related File: Tree Removal Permit 99-19, VII. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS F. EMPIRE LAKES DESIGN GUIDELINES - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES - Review of supplemental design guidelines for the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, a 380 acre Mixed Use project surrounding the Empire Lakes Golf Course, and bounded by Milliken Avenue, Fourth Street, Utica Avenue, and the Metrolink railroad. Related flies: Development Review 99-39 and Tentative Parcel Maps 15350 and 15346. Page 2 VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the genera/public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS X. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they sha~ be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I. Gall Sanchez. Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 19. 1999, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. / Page 3 VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 25, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Vicki Chilicki, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: VACATION O1: A 6' WIDE EASEMENT FOR I:)RAINAGE PURPOSES, V-165, LOCATED BETWEEN SEVENTtl STREET AND SIXTII STREET, ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF TI[E RAILROAD SI'UR CROSSING FOR BOTH 10401 SEVENTH STREET AND 10404 SIXTH STREET - APN 209-262-16 AND 15. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On September 25, 1985/he City accepted a 6' wide drainage casement along the west side of an industrial building. The flows from Seventh Street were intercepted by a catch basin and transferred to a rectangular gutter through an 15" RCP pipe. The flows were then channeled to Sixtit street through tile gutter. I it August, 1991 the City constructed a 30" storm drain widtin a 12' storn~ drain easement west of the 6' storm drain casement. The 15" lateral was abandoned and the existing catch basin connected to the new 30" stom~ drain. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrccomnmnds that the Planning Commission make tile finding. through minute action, that the vacation conforms v,'ith the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respectfully submitted, DaII J:.l/lles Senior Civil Engineer DJ:vjc Attachments: Exhibit "A'~ Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Copy of Easement ITEM A CITY OF ITEM: V- RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: VIf_INITY ~'GI~EfRI,NC DIVISION EXHIBIT: ":-'P~'~[L Ks,2 7731 a[CC~C~=~ L~ ' ' :":':' ~"~S;E?2S ': ~N.~,~co&.~u.,_~.ro ~:.:. ,~.~ I c,.::: t ~c,' 'SAN 8ER:~AROi,~';O ' FOR A VALU,.U)LE CONSIDE P, ATIO~/. rcc'~pl Of which ~ N'r~by almckno, w:cdZ,:d, '4"' Cajiromb, [k-sc,-ik-d u Folio,s: i~?.. ;' 55-236519 .~:.: A-~-SES,SOFIPARCELNO. L~3fJ-.~62.__,____:*|6___., CITY OF RANCHO CL;CA,XlONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 25, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rebecca Van Buren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-39 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES - A master plan for the development of Planning Areas VIII and a portion of Planning Area X of the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan. located on the west side of Milliken Avenue, north of Fourth Street and Seventh Street, respectively - APN: 210-08248 and 210-272-18. Related files: Tenlative Parcel Maps 15350 and 15346. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land use and Zoninq: Planninq Area VIII: North - Vacant land; Planning Area IX (Office/Induslrial/Commercial) South - Vacant land; Planning Area VII (Mixed-Use Commercial) East Industrial development: Subarea 12 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Industrial Park) West Empire Lakes Golf Course; Planning Area I (Golf Course/Clubhouse/Maintenance Facility) Planninq Area X: North - Passenger rail line; Planning Area X (Metrolink StalionlOfficellndustriall Commercial) South - Vacant land; Planning Area IX (Office/Industrial/Commercial) East - Industrial development; Subareas 10 and 11 of Ihe Industrial Area Specific Plan General Industrial) West EmpireLakesGol[Course;PlanningAreal(GolfCourse/Clubhouse/Maintenance Facility) B. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Mixed Use North - Commercial Recrealion South - Mixed Use East Industrial Park and General Industrial West Open Space ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 99-39 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES August 25, 1999 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The subject site consists of 2 of the 11 Planning Areas within the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan. The first area. Planning Area VIII. is 22.7 acres located on the southwest corner of Sixth Street and Milliken Avenue. The second area. Planning Area X, is 23.7 acres located west of Milliken Avenue, south of the rail road. and includes approximately 10 acres developed as the Metrolink commuler rail station. The sites contain active vineyards and undeveloped land. ANALYSIS: A. Backqround: The Empire Lakes Subarea Specific Plan was adopled by the City in 1994 to provide a strategic, creative approach to address a pending vacancy of close to 1 million square feet oi' office space and 300 acres of adjacenl vacant properties known as the General Dynamics properties. The Specific Plan is designed to allow an adaptive re-use of /he General Dynamics properties wilh a championship golf course (Empire Lakes Golf Course) as the central theme. and a variety of supporting land uses surrounding the golf course. The City and General Dynamics entered into a Development Agreement in 1994 Io facilitate and implement the re-use and development of the area. The Empire Lakes Specific Plan and Development Agreement include specific requirements and streamlined review of projects. This application is being processed pursuant to the procedures in the Specific Plan and Development Agreement. The Subarea 18 Specific Plan was approved by City Council through adoption of their Ordinance No. 525, which requires preparation of supplemental design guidelines. The guidelines must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and are the subject of a separate staff report on Ionight's agenda. The Specific Plan requires a Master plan for each planning area at Ihe time of first subdivision or development application. Once the Planning Commission approves Ihe Master Plan, individual projects/buildings wilhin the area are subject to Cily Planner review and approval. Development applications are exempted by lhe Specific Plan from lhe Design Review Committee and are subject to review by lhe Technical Review and Grading Committees only. B. General: The proposed Masler Plan indicates conceplual building locations, general land uses. and circulation. The Master Plan is intended to serve a general conceptual guideline for future development activities within the subject planning area. and is not intended to "carve in stone" rigid development limitations. General Dynamics is not proposing specific users or construction of buildings at this lime. Future development will be subject to separate design review procedures. The Master Plan allows the parcel maps in the related applicalions to be considered by the City. C. Analysis: The attached Master Plan presents the design vision for the two planning areas and shows lhe development potential of the sites. The master plan effectively articulates the goals of the Specific Plan and is consistent with Ihe developmenl slandards and design guidelines. The master plan highlights important standards and design requiremenls, such as selbacks, golf course edge treatment. outdoor employee eating areas, truck loading. trailer parking, and the use of two primary building materials. The Master Plan includes a "zero" side yard setback to allow buildings to be joined in three areas, between Lots 2 and 3. Lots 6 and 7, and Lots 8 and 9. The Master Plan states that where development proposes zero PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 99-39- GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES August25,1999 Page 3 setbacks, all exposed property line walls shall be architecturally treated, even during interim conditions. Staff added a clarification to the proposed tree palette (page 7 of the Masler Plan) to indicate the street tree matrix is conceptual only, and that the actual tree species and locations will be determined by the City. The Resolution of Approval includes the standard condition that street trees shall be installed per City Standard in accordance with the City's street tree program. D. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified as a Master EIR for Subarea 18 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan in 1994. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified. no further EIR or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Master EIR. A project will be considered "within the scope" of the Master EIR if it is described within the document and will: 1. Have no additional significant effect on the environment that was not identified in the Master EIR; and 2. Require no new or additional mitigation measures or alternatives. Staff completed the Initial Study Part II and determined the project is within the scope ol the Master EIR for Subarea 18 and that no additional significant effects. mitigation measures, or alternatives are required. The appropriate Findings are included in the attached Resolution of Approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. which includes an environmental determination that the project is within the scope of the certified Master EIR for the site. Respectfully submitted, er City Planner BB:RVB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Master Plan for Planning Areas VIII and X for IASP Subarea 18 Exhibit "B" - Environmental Initial Study Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions iKvI[AST]E]~ ]FO]t~ ]P]LA\NN][NG AK]R_]EAKS V ][ ][ ][ A\ N ]D) X IFolr If ASP Sub-Area Prepared For EMPIRE LAKES Cily 0f Rancho Cucamonga Prepared By ipp.!i..e.d....v.l~.n..n.j.n.o.!.n..c: July ~9. t999 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT OVERVIEW ....................................................................................1 A. Introduction .........................................................................................................1 II. DEVELOPMENT STANOARDS ....................................................................... 2 Ill.DESIGN CONCEPTS .......................................................................................5 IV. ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES ..................................................................... 8 A. Architectural Character ........................................................................................8 B. Building Mass ......................................................................................................9 C. Building Orientation .............................................................................................9 D. Entries ...............................................................................................................10 E. Materials ............................................................................................................11 F. Colors ...............................................................................................................11 G. Buirding Screening ...........................................................................................11 H. Windows ...........................................................................................................11 I. Outdoor Employee Eating Areas .......................................................................12 J. Signs .................................................................................................................12 K. Roof ..................................................................................................................12 L. Truck Loading ....................................................................................................12 V. GRADING PLAN ............................................................................................13 VI. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................... 15 Maslcr Plan Planning Areas VIII I. PROJECT OVERVIEW The Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan (Specific Plan) is a development concept for a mixed-use project comprised of approximately 380 acres. The Specific Plan site is bordered by Fourth Street on the south. Milliken Avenue on the east, the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe (AT&SF) Railroad on the north, and Cleveland Avenue and Utica Street on the west. The Specific Plan is commonly referred to as the Empire Lakes Center Specific Plan. The Specific Plan was prepared by the property owner, General Dynamics Propedies. Inc. (GD), and was adopted by the City Council in July 1994. A Development Agreement stipulating the responsibilities of both City and developer was adopted concurrent with the Specific Plan. A wide range of uses are permitted throughout the Specific Plan area, including recreation, hotel or conference center, retail, restaurant. entertainment, office, research and development and light industrial. The Specific Plan divides the project into distinct Planning Areas numbered I through XI. The cornerstone of the Specific Plan is the Empire Lakes Golf Course, Iocaled in Planning Areas IA and IB, which encompasses nearly 40 percent of the project acreage. The provisions of the Specific Plan require that subsequent development within Planning Areas III and V through XI would be accomplished via the preparation of separate Master Plans. No Master Plan is required for Planning Areas II and IV, or GD Buildings 601 and 602. In addition. to meet the requirements of the Specific Plan. Supplemental Design Guidelines are required for the entire 380-acre site prior to or concurrent with any Master Plan approval. A. Introduction This Master Plan pertains to two of the planning areas, Planning Area VIII and X. Planning Area VIII consists of 23 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Sixth Street and Milliken Avenue. Planning Area X consists of 9 acres located adjacent to the existing Metrolink Slation and west of Azusa Coud and Anaheim Place. The Master Plan for these planning areas responds to the requirements of the Specific Plan and the marketing strategies developed by GD. The Master Plan has been crafted in response to development inquiries that GD has received while attempting to market individual planning areas over the past three years. In discussions with potential developers, it became apparent Ihat there is a demand for smaller development parcels in the range of one to three acres. To accommodate these requests, GD has initiated a process to sub-divide the planning areas into these Master Plan I ~ ' Planning Areas Vlll & X $ {i~ ~ smaller parcels. GD is also responding to the City's request to provide a temporary parking site to accommodate the expansion of the Metrolink Station. The subdivision of Planning Area X will create a 3 acre site for this purpose. The Master Plan process presents a unique challenge for GD. The general purpose of the Master Plan is to establish design parameters for the subsequent development of the planning areas. These design considerations need to be established at a point in time when no specified users have been identified. Further complicating this process, both Planning Areas VIII and X permit a diverse range of potential land uses including office, research and development, light industrial uses and commercial sites for fast food restaurants or banking. GD envisions that the majority of the proposed parcels will be developed by corporate and/or high end research and development users. The Master Plan and the associated Supplemental Design Guidelines have been designed ~o accommodate individual property ownership without the need for an ongoing association to maintain any portion of the properties. The Master Plan is intended to conceptually present a design vision for the planning areas. Subsequent detailed analysis of specific land use proposals, architecture and design concepts are anticipated as individual parcels are developed. Consistent with the administrative provisions of the adopted Specific Plan. these subsequent development proposals will be reviewed and approved by the City slaff. The Master Plan for Planning Areas VIII and X includes conceptual building locations. overall circulation. points of ingress and egress to public streets, golf course edge treatment. conceptual parking lot layouts, design concepts, conceptual architectural guidelines, conceptual grading and drainage plans and subdivision plans. As previously noted, land planning concepts and architectural designs for individual parcels will be reviewed as pad of the subsequent planning review process. I1. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The envelopes for future development within the Masler Plan areas are generally defined by the setbacks regulating the properly. These setbacks are defined within the Specific Plan and are presented in the following exhibits to assist the reader in understanding the areas available for future development for each proposed parcel. The application of the prevailing setbacks and the development standards presented within Section 5 of the Specific Plan will establish the parameters for the site planning of each proposed parcel. Master Plan 2 a~ ' Planning Areas VIII & X ~,in~ t~:s SETBACK STUDY FOR PLANNING AREA VIII SIXTH STREET Curb 25' ParkJng Setbac~ L~ndsc3pe .~ g & law4cr-~pe Se~c.k LOT z 1.5 ACRES ,p,/w LOT 9 3.5 ACRES g & landscape Setback 1.5 ACRES L_. o' I~lrdlng 2S' Parldng Pmpe~:y Une LOT 3 LOT 8 2.1 ACRES--2~Su,dl~S~ LOT 4 ~ 2 ACRES _~5' ~iJdlng ~ LOT 7 2 ACRES /'- LOT 5 .... 2.5 ACRES '>,;,~ LOT 6 ~""~, 1.5 ACRES ~'~,~ Mas~cr Plan Planning Areas VIII SETBACK STUDY FOR PLANNING AREA X 5' Building Setback Building Setback 25' Building PARCEL 'A' +- 3.49 ACRES ky\ 15' Parking ~tbac y5' Building Setback PARCEL '13' ",, L 40' V. qDE ~,vO EA..~ENT 25' Builing Setback /--- 10' Building Setback EMPIRE LAKES GOLF COURSE ', PARCEL 'B' x'~ +- 5.72 ACRES R/w---, "' LU ', ]5 Parking Setback I T i 5' Building Nla~cr Plan 4 ' ~ ' .,~----- Planning Arcas VIII & X Ill. DESIGN CONCEPTS The overall site landscape development shall conform to the standards presented in Section 5 of the adopted Specific Plan. The following figures illustrate the application of these concepts throughout the proposed planning areas. The Major Project Entry Treatment, Minor/Major Parcel Entry Treatment and Parcel Entry Treatment are design concepts that will be applied to future development throughout the Specific Plan area. Additional entry locations may be permitted per the Specific Plan. Details of these treatments are illuslrated within lhe Supplemental Design Guidelines document. The palette of acceplable trees and details of lhe proposed Golf Course Edge Treatment for Planning Areas VIII and X are presented within this section of the document. PLANNING AREA VIII MINOR PARCEL MAJOR PROJECT ENTRY GATEWAY TREATMENT GOLF COURSE EDGE TREATMENT- PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENT MAjOR PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENT Mas~cr Plan 5 .,~k ' Plannin,~, Arcas VIII & X EM;,r~ LAXFS PLANNING AREA X MINOR PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENT MAJOR PARCEL ........,.j// ENTRY TREATMENT Mastcr Plan 6 ,~ ' Planning Arcas VIII & X [M~-,~r~ u,xEs Tree Palette '~ The following table presents the permitted tree palette to be used throughout the Master Plan area. Street Tree Type Species Description Sixth Street Street Tree · Eucalyptus rudis Random placement at (Swamp Gum) 35' o.c. · Liquidambar styracifiua Backdrop to (American Sweet Gum) Eucalyptus at 25' o.c. Milliken Avenue Street Tree · Brachychiton pupulneus 70 percent informal (Bottle Tree) drifts at 25' o.c. · Liquidambar styracifiua 30 percent informal (American Sweet Gum) drifts at 25' o.c. Accent Tree · Albizia julibrissen 'Rosa' (Silk Tree) · Lagerstroemia indica (Crape My~le) · Cinnamomumum camphora (Camphor Tree) Azusa Court Street Tree ° Plantanus acerifolia Semi-formal regular (London Plane Tree) planling at 30' o.c. Anaheim Place Street Tree · Pislacia chinensis Semi-formal regular (Chinese Pislache) planting at 30' o.c. Local Road "A" Street Tree ° Plantanus acerifolia Semi-formal regular (London Plane Tree) planting at 30' o.c. Local Road "B" Street Tree ° Geifera parvifiora Semi-formal regular (Australian Willow) planting at 25' o.c. o.c. =On Center Concep'l'u,-I Planning Arcas VIII 60L,~COURSe V" GOLF COURSE EDGE TREAMENT C~.v~C~PE.vOT..~4.,~Rr The landscape development within the 10-foot wide setback adjacent to the golf courses shall PLI,,N rlNG consist of tall and medium size ~.hrubs (Xylosma congesturn. Nerium oleander. Ligustrum texanum, Raphiolepis indica. Agapanthus africanus, Hemerocallis sp.) as well as evergreen trees (Pinus canariensis, Eucalyptus rudis, and Schinus lerbinlhifolius). The planrings shall provide colorful and dense screening for the full length of the properly line. The planter area shall I'ROI'I~RI'Y LINE include a conlinuous bed of groundcover. P,,IRKI,VG LO BLDG. tJ/'/e Where the building serves as the properly- screening element from the golf course. lhe · setback shall be planted with screen trees and ground cover· IV. ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES The Architectural Guidelines are intended to create standards to ensure that the development demonstrates an attractive, safe and enjoyable environment. Consistency will also be created based on the architectural policies presented within the Specific Plan. These guidelines are not intended to address every possible use permitted within Planning Areas Vtll and X; rather, they are intended to provide a framework for subsequent designers to consider when establishing individual development themes. A. Architectural Character Buildings within Planning Areas VIII and X are envisioned to include a variety of distinct architectural styles. These high-quality, contemporary buildings would be situated within a "campus-style" business park setting and would be appropriate to their proposed uses, location and site conditions. The architectural character of buildings may reflect a distinct "corporate" image. Ma~tcr Plan 8 .zt,~ -- Planning Areas VIII & X EMP,t~ LJ~IES B. Building Mass Exterior walls shall promote the use of openings and breaks to enhance articulation. Exterior wall elevations should provide articulation through the use of openings and recesses providing opportunities for texture and shadow patterns. Multiple story buildings should relate to pedestrian scale, Roof lines should be articulated with shorter elements to reduce apparent building massiveness. C. Building Orientation Buildings should orient their pedestrian entrances toward the interior street. Buildings should also be oriented to take advantage of the golf course views through the strategic placement of windows and/or plazas, Building configuration and placement should create defined areas that can be adequately secured. Nlastcr Plan Planning Arcas VIII D. Entries Entries should be placed in obvious locations, adjacent to and visible from the interior street. Additional creative architectural expression, including the use of both formal and informal plazas, will be encouraged at the entry points. ,%,'faslcr Ph~n I0 Planning Arcas VIIi E. Materials Materials employed should be appropriate for the use and design concept of the development. Materials used are expected to take into consideration form, scale, location. consistency and function. A wide variety of solid building materials may be selected from a palette of stone (natural, cut or stone veneer). masonry (brick, split aggregate faced), textured concrete, or other materials that demonstrate a similar architectural character. Glass will also be considered as a primary solid building material. Each building is required to incorporate Ihe use of two variations of the primary building ~naterials. F. Colors A variety of colors may be used ranging from neutral tones of white to deeper shades of earth tones. The tasteful application of identifiable corporate colors, as color accents, will be permitled. Colors and finishes should be coordinated on all exterior elevations to achieve a total continuity of design. G. Building Screening In instances where development proposes the incorporation of zero setbacks, all exposed property line walls shall be architecturally treated. If an exposed wall is intended to be an interim condition to be screened by a future building, lhe interim condition should be trealed, unless construction of both buildings is being undedaken concurrently. H. Windows Use of daylight shall be considered in all buildings through the design of window locations on exterior facades and interiors within "atrium" type structures. Proper uses of daylight will enhance the potential for using low-consumption ~uorescent lighting and time-controlled heating and air-conditioning units. .",laslcr Plan I I zt~ -- ,: Planning Areas VIII & X [MI',I~'I~ LA~ES J I. Outdoor Employee Eating Areas Outdoor employee eating areas shall be attractively designed and to the extent possible, oriented in a manner to take advantage of existing views. J. Signs Signs should be architecturally integrated within the building design. The design of signs, placement, materials, colors, Copy, size and construction details shall be in compliance with the City Sign Ordinance (Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code). K. Roof Building design shall pay special attention to roof area treatments and materials. Portions of flat roof areas may be considered for use as terraces. All exposed roof material ballast or membrane will be color-coordinated with the building exterior colors and shall be visually compatible with the surrounding area. Roof styles may be fiat with parapet or sloped. Sloped roofs may use a variety of roofing materials including metal-ribbed roofing or other high-quality materials that demonstrate similar architectural character. / / / / / / / / / / L. Truck Loading Site planning for individual parcels shall provide one truck parking stall for each loading dock door proposed within the building. All truck loading areas shall be oriented away from view of public streets and appropriately screened from other public vantage points. Maslcr Plan 12 ,z~, -- Planning Arcas VIII & X EvP,f~ U,~ES V. GRADING PLAN A. Planning Area VIII The existing topography of Planning Area VIII slopes gently from the north to the south. The conceptual grading design attempts to utilize the existing terrain by stepping the proposed pad elevations from the north to the south. The pads are designed to drain from the back to front with a proposed slope of one percent (1%), The proposed street grades will be southerly sloping with grades varying from one to 2.5 percent. The proposed grading along the westerly edge of the site (along the Empire Lakes Golf Course) will contain minor slopes from the existing ground up to the proposed pads. The conceptual grading plan has been designed to balance cut and fill quantities and will therefore not require any export or import during the precise grading design. Sbdh Sireel Maslcr Plan 13 ,,~- ' Planning Areas VIII & X E~,.,t,~ ,-,~'~s B. Planning Area X The existing topography of the site slopes gently from the north to the south. The conceptual grading design attempts to utilize the existing terrain. Parcel 1 of the Tentative Parcel Map has the proposed design sloping from nodh to south at 1 percent. At the southerly end of the parcel. there is a proposed slope (2:1 maximum). Parcel 2 is proposed to be graded in a slightly different manner. This design will commence at the north and slopes to the south at 3 percent. The design flattens out to 1 percent through the middle of the site then increases to 3 percent again towards the south end of the site into the existing street (Anaheim Place) and through a sidewalk culvert. ,%laslcr Plan 14 Planning Arcas VIII ..~ X VI. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS A. Planning Area VIII The existing drainage on Sixth Street flows from Milliken Avenue to the west. Milliken Avenue drainage flows to the south. The proposed drainage of the site will flow from each pad to the street. The conceptual drainage plan proposes a low point in the knuckle of the proposed interior street. Two catch basins for collection will be constructed to convey the water to an outlet pipe on the south of the site. The pipe will outlet to a proposed desilting basin located on Parcels 6 and 7 of Parcel Map No. 14647, The flows will then be carried to another outlet within a proposed day light ditch where the water will then be spread back to a natural flow situation. These flows will be to the south and over Parcel 7 of Parcel Map No. 14647. The low point in the knuckle is designed so that an emergency overflow will be handled within the proposed street and be released to Milliken Avenue. Sixth Sireel -...: _ · ' :-:. i i; .~.-_2,;;~z.'-.,, .... ~ i1 -_-2;-2.., .: ....... Maslcr Plan I~ .... J ' Planning Arcas VIII B. Planning Area X Anaheim and Azusa Court both drain southerly into an existing storm drain system within Anaheim Place. The existing storm drain flows to the south and then westerly to an outlet structure south of the project. Nlastcr Plan 16 ~ ' Plannin~ Arcas VIII RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE Clef OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 99-39, A MASTER PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANNING AREAS 8 AND 10 OF THE EMPIRE LAKES SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, NORTH OF FOURTH STREET AND SEVENTH STREET, RESPECTIVELY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-082-48 AND 210-272-18 A. Recitals. 1. General Dynamics Properties Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Development Review 99-39, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified as a Master EIR for the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan on June 1, 1994, under State Clearinghouse No. 93102055. The Master EIR contemplates subsequent projects which will be carried out or approved pursuant to the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan and a Development Agreement. 3. General Dynamics Corporation and the City of Rancho Cucamonga entered into a Development Agreement regarding potential development of the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan. which was recorded as Document No. 94432407 on October 24, 1994. 4. On the 25th day of August 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the applicalion and concluded said meeting on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts sel forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on August 25, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located in Planning Areas 8 and 10 of the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan. Planning Area 8 is 22.7 acres located on the soulhwest corner of Sixth Street and Milliken Avenue, and has approximately 760 feet of frontage on Sixth Street and 1300 feet of frontage on Milliken Avenue. Planning Area 10 is 23.7 acres located west of Milliken Avenue, south of the railroad, and includes approximately 10 acres developed as the Metrolink commuter rail station. Planning Area 10 has approximately 825 feet of frontage on Milliken Avenue, over 600 feet of frontage on Ariahelm Place, and 400 feet of frontage on Azusa Coud. The sites contain active vineyards and undeveloped land. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-39- GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES August25,1999 Page 2 b. The property to the north and south of Planning Area 8 is vacant land. to the east is industrial development, and to the west is a golf course. c. The property to/he north of Planning Area 10 is a passenger rail line, to the south is vacant land, to the east is industrial development, and to the west is a golf course. d. The application consists of a 16-page report that presents the design vision for the planning areas and shows the development potential of the sites. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during lhe above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings and facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of lhe General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of lhe Development Code and the purpose of the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan in which the site is located: and, c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan, and the Development Agreement for the subject property recorded in the San Bernardino County Official Records as Document No. 94432407; and. d. The proposed use, together with Ihe conditions applicable thereto. will not be detrimental to the public health. safety, or welfare or malerially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified as a Master EIR for the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan. The California Environmental Qualily Act (CEQA) Section 21157.1 provides that the preparation and certification of a Master EIR allows for the limited review of subsequent projects that were described in lhe Master EIR as being within the scope of the report in accordance with certain requirements. The Planning Commission hereby finds: a. The City of Rancho Cucamonga was the lead agency in the Master EIR and is the lead agency in this subsequent project. b. An Initial Sludy was prepared on this subsequent project on August 5, 1999. c. The subsequent project is a master plan of development for 2 of the 11 Planning Areas within the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan and is consistent with the development standards and design guidelines therein. 5. Based upon Ihe facts and information contained in the Initial Study. together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-39- GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES August25,1999 Page 3 a. The Initial Study has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Initial Study with regard to the application. b. The subsequent project is within the scope of the project covered by the Master EIR. c. The proposed subsequent project will have no additional significant effect on the environment that was not identified in the Master EIR and that no new or additional mitigation measures or alternatives are required. d. No new environmental document nor findings shall be required pursuant to lhe Streamlined Environmental Review procedures for Master EIRs in the California Environmental Quality Act. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Condilions, allached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) Within 45 days of this approval, a revised Master Plan lext incorporating the following change to Page 7, Tree Palette, shall be submitted to the Planning Division in an unbound, original copy format: Conceptual only - Actual tree species and locations shall be determined by City in accordance with the City's Street Tree Program. Enqineerinq Division 1) Provide a drainage report which studies options of drainage alternatives as follows: a) Surface runoff discharge from public streets onto private property south of Fifth Street continuing to Fourlh Street. b) Surface runoff discharge from public streets westerly to the golf course continuing to the detention basin. Drainage facilities and off°site agreements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Off-site agreements shall be obtained prior to final parcel map approval. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-39 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES August 25, 1999 Page 4 2) Right-of-way for the south half of Fifth Street shall be recorded and. in addition, provide rights-of-entry to grade off site for the street construction, prior to issuance of building permits. 3) The south property line for Parcel 5 along the project boundary shall be located at the top o1' slope. Off-site rights-of-entry for grading to accomplish this are required. 4) In the event development of Planning Areas 6 and 7 warrant extending Street "A" south to Fourth Street, per the initial Master Plan, the developer will be responsible for reconstructing the knuckle at Fifth and "A" Streets as a "T'" intersection. 5) Provide the following improvements, per the improvement certificate for Parcel 8 on Parcel Map 14647 and Exhibit "C" of Development Agreement 94-01 (Ordinance 526): a) Realign Sixth Street/Milliken Avenue intersection to eliminate the 12-foot centedine offset, including median, for 600 feet west of Milliken Avenue. Include all turning lanes for ultimate intersection geometrics. Reimbursement may be requested from Parcel 9 of parcel Map 14647. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. b) Landscape the Sixth Street median. Reimbursement may be requested from Parcel 9 of Parcel Map 14657. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreemenl within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all fights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. c) Underground the existing overhead utilities on the south side of Sixth Street. 6) Individual parcels within Tentative Parcel Map 15350 will be conditioned to pay the following fees, per Exhibit "D" of Development Agreement 94-01 (Ordinance 526), upon development: a) Transportation Development fees. b) A contribution in lieu of construction for the Milliken Avenue median as outlined in City Council Resolution No. 89-574. Since there is an inflation clause in this resolution, the developer could opt to pay with the final map and spread the cost among nine parcels rather than four parcels. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-39- GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES August25,1999 Page 5 7) Milliken Avenue shall be improved to "Major Divided Arterial" standards, including street lights, traffic signs, and traffic striping: a) Provide a 200-foot right turn lane southbound on Milliken Avenue at the Fifth Street intersection. (~ ~ Provide a standard bus bay south of Sixth Street. c ,cO Modify the Milliken Avenue/Sixth Street traffic signal as required for the intersection realignment. c~ ,~) Provide R26(S) "No Stopping" signs. P_~/f~ No driveway access from individual parcels. 8) Sixth Street shall be improved to "Major Divided Arterial" standards, including street lights, traffic signs, and traffic striping: a) Provide a right turn lane eastbound on Sixth Street starting 150 feet west of "A" Street and continuin9 to the Milliken Avenue intersection. b) Provide R26(S) "No Stopping" signs. c) No driveway access from individual parcels. 9) Fifth Street and "A" Street shall be installed full width, to "Local Industrial" standards (Including street lights, traffic signs, and traffic striping: a) Fifth Street shall align with existing Fifth Street east of Milliken Avenue. b) Provide R26 "No Parking" signs. c) Driveways shall be in accordance with City standards. 10) Street trees and parkway landscaping along Milliken Avenue and Sixth Street shall conform to the respective beautification master plans as outlined in Table 5-4 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Local street trees shall conform to the list of Approved Street Trees for Rancho Cucamonga. Any conflicts shall be removed from the Master Plan document. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-39 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES August 25, 1999 Page 5 7) Milliken Avenue shall be improved to "Major Divided Arter standards, including street lights, traffic signs, and traffic stripir a) Provide a 200-foot right turn lane southbound or '~ Avenue at the Fifth Street intersection. b) Provide a left turn pocket in the existing median bound traffic at the Fifth Street intersection. c) Provide a standard bus bay south of Sixth t. d) Modify the Milliken Avenue/Sixth Street t ;ignal as required for the intersection realignment. e) Provide R26(S) "No Stopping" sigr O No driveway access from indivk parcels. 8) Sixth Street shall be improved to" or Divided Artedar' standards, including street lights. traffic traffic striping: a) Provide a right turn lan on Sixth Street starling 150 feet west of "A" and continuing to the Milliken Avenue intersection. b) Provide R26(S) "1' g" signs. c) No driveway from individual parcels. 9) Fifth Str, Street shall be installed full width, to "Local Industria Including street lights, traffic signs, and traffic stripin! ,~et shall align with existing Fifth Street east of Milliken Aver !. ,S "No Parking" signs. )riveways shall be in accordance with City standards. 10) trees and parkway landscaping along Milliken Avenue and <th Street shall conform to the respective beautification master fans as outlined in Table 5-4 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. .coal street trees shall conform to the list of Approved Street Trees for Rancho Cucamonga. Any conflicts shall be removed from the Master Plan document. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-39 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES August 25, 1999 Page 6 % 11 ) An infrastructure phasing plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the recordation of the Final Parcel Map. The phasing plan shall include the sequence of public improvements based on the potential build-out oi' Parcel Map No. 15350. Mitiqafion Measures 1) All applicable mitigation measures adopted for the Master EIR Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 18 Specific Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 93102055) shall apply to this project. 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall cerlify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of August 1999, by the following vote-to*wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Development Review 99-39 SUBJECT: ~lannin9 Areas 8 and 10 APPLICANT: General Dynamics Properties LOCATION: West side of Milliken Avenue, north of 4th Street & 7th Street ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2790, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmentJDesign Review approval shall expire if building per ' arenotissuedorapprovedusehasnotcommencedwithin5yearsfromthedate of approv nless exten~ded pursuant to the time periods in the Developmener ~1 C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developeci and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan~d Development Agreement.~) 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the Development Agreement. Project No. DR 99-39 Completion Date D. Shopping Centers 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (e~ach buildinQ Dad/Dja. rcel) .... ..b.e_,su, b,j_e~cL t_o_,..s~e_p_a~at,e~ D,e,vel,opmre, nt/D~e_si,,gD R_evj~w,p, ro~c.ess~...c,r :,Z:;nr,;r...~ Fsrn,.rn.,;ssic, r.. 1 b b' t t at De eloprnentlD~ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: E. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs 'shall be dedicated per City Standards. 2. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: 6th Street, "A" Street, 5th Street, and Millikan Avenue. 3. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 4. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes and bus bay, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curt adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 5. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: 5th Street. F. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos. landscaped areas, etc.).shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street im. provements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & A.C. Bide- Ddve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Millikan Avenue X c X X 'X e, f 6th Street X c X X X e 5th Street X X X X X X "A" Street X X X X X X SC - 6/14/99 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PROJECT ~: ~iew 99-39 SUBJECT: Planning Areas ~1' and 10 APPLICANT: General Dynamics Properties LOCATION: West side of Milliken Avenue. north of 4th Street & 7th ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPL ) · APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVI', FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements CompletiOn Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend ! expense any action brought against the City, its __/__ agents. officers he issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, ~o relinquish such ~nt shall reimburse the City, its agenls, officers. or employees. for any Cou ttorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be requir to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion. padicipate at ib nse in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant, ligations under this condition. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Perrail ariance, or Development]Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are no, ued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No exte~ C. Site Development 1. :cordance wilh/he approved plans which include / site exterior malerials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on in the Planning Division, the condilions contained herein, Development Co~!e~ 3nd the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan. 2. uest shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, / all o )licable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the g permit issuance. D. Shopping Centers 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) / / shall be subject to separate DevelopmentJDesign Review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to theMaster Plan shall be subiect to Planning Commission approva APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: · E. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / 2. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the follow streets, except for / approved openings: 6th Street, "A" Street, 5th Street, and Millik !. 3. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outsidl public right-of-way shall __ __/__ be dedicated to the City. 4. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along righi , lanes and bus bay, to provide / a minimum of 7 feet measured from the If cu sed along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree mainh provided. 5. The developer shall make a good ., the required off-site property interests __ __/__ necessary to construct the required and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to subrt map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pc eminent Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the propert improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connecti< Ath the subdivi Sec~t"~ for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash d~ , ' 'n t e amount giv n ~'!an appraisal report obtained by ,he developer. a, deve,o s,,, ;a,ser shal, ha '; approved by ,he City prior to commencemenl of the appraL, condillon applies in pa r, but not limited to: 5th Street. F. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements erior streets, drainage facilities, commun ty Ira s, paseos, landscaped __/ / areas, etc.) shown o~ p shall be constructed to City Slandards. Interior street . but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the I perimeter street improvements nc ud ng. but not limited to: / / Millikeil~venue X c X X X e,f 6th Street X c X X X 5th Street X X X X X X : "A" Street X X X X X X Completion Date Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) R26(S) "No stopping" signs. (0 bus bay. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteetrig completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, lees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to Ihe satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with purl boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1)Pull boxes shall be No. 6atinterseclionsandNo. 5 along streets, arnaximumof200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at inlersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersectiOnS per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots, h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 4.Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger. shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or fargel streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. Project NO. DR 99-39 ~ornpletton Dale G. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall / be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 6th Street median and Milliken Avenue median reconstruction. 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of monared cobble / or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriale Landscape and Lighting __/__ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by lhe / /__ developer until accepted by the City. 5. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective I__1 Beauti~cation Master Plan: Milliken Avenue and 6th Street. H. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map __ __/ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by Ihe City Engineer. 2. Trees ate prohibited within 5 feet el' the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured / from the outer edge of a mature tree Irunk. 3. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in __ __ I__ a sump catch basin on Ihe public street. I. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of exisling utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCVVD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of Ihe County el San Bernard~no. A lelter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits. whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residenhal projects. J. General Requirements and Approvals 1. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance / of building permits, whichever occurs first, for Parcel 7 and 8. Project NO. OR 99~39 Comiclotion eate 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Fire flow requirement shall be 3,000 gallons per minute. a.A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test oi' the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 2. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i,e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 3. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, __ __/~ if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a 4-inch and a 2-112-inch outlet, Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contacl the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 4. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / submitted to the Fire District thai an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of the required fire protection system. 5. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final / inspection. 6. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. / X Other: 1997 UBC. Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, fiammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 7. Sprinkler syslem monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of / sprinkler system. 8. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. / 9. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as holed: / X All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. / 10. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. __ __/ 11. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet __ __/ 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus. 12. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: X Standard Directory in main lobby. / 13. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall / be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 14. $132.00 Fire District fee(s), and a $1 per "plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho / Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit issuance." A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal, "Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 15. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC. UFC, / UPC. UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA DA'FE: August 25, 1999STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of tile Plannhlg Comnzission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: ~Villic Valbucna, Assistant Engineer SUBj[ZC'F: TENTATIVE PARCI.~[, MAP 1535~) - GENEItAI, I)YNA~IICS PROPERTIES - A subdivision of 20.24 acres of kind into 9 parcels in the Mixed Use designation of the Subarea I ~ Specific Plan, located at the smHhwest comer of Nl ill ikcu Avcm~c and 6m Street - APN: 210- 082-4~ . Related files: Development Review 99-39 PROJECT AND SII'E DESCRIPI'ION: A. Action Rcqncsted: Approval of the proposed l'cntativc l'arccl Nlap as shown on Exhibit "B". B. Parcel Size: Parcel I 1.50 acres Parcel 2 1.49 acres Parcel 3 2. I0 acres Parcel 4 2,01 acres Parcel 5 2.50 acres Parcel 6 3.49 acres Parcel 7 3.20 acre% Parcel 8 2.01 acres Parcel 9 1.94 ncrc'~ 20.24 acres C. l~xistin~ Zoning: Mixed Use designation of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan within the Industrial Area Specific Plan 1). Surrouncfing I,and Use and Zoning: Nortit vacant land; IHanning Area IX (Officc/h~dustrial/Colnn~ercial), Subarea I g Specific l~lan. IASP South vacant land; Planning Area Vll (Mixed-Use Commercial), Subarea 18 Specific Plan, [ASP East induslrial development; Subarea 12 of the h~duslria[ Specific l'lan (Industrial Park). Subarea 18 Specific Plan, IASP West Enlpirc Lakes GoLf' Course: Pialming .'\rca I (Golf CotJrsc/Clubhtn~sc/Nlaintellance Facility). Subarea 18 Specific Plan. IASP E. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and the property is situated at the southv~'cst corner of 6'" Street and Milliken Avenue. Fifth Street and "A" Street shall bc installed filll width. lit "l,ocal h~dustrial" standards (including street lights. traffic signs and traffic striplags). wilh tile map. All improvemetals to Millikcn Avenue, 6'~ Street, 5a' Street and "A" Street shall be bonded for v. ith the final parcel map, to be completed within one year or rccordatlon. Sidewalks. street trees and drive approaches shall be installed upon development orcach parcel. iTEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 15350 August 25, 1999 Page 2 ANAI,YSIS: The purpose of the parcel map is to subdivide Planning Area VIII of the IASP Subarea Specific Plan (Exhibit "D") into 9 parcels for sale purposes. The applicant has provided a master plan (Exhibit "C") to show how cvcntual development on all parcels could occur. Said master plan was rcvicwcd by staff and various City departments and was found to be acccplablc. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental Impact Repog (EIR) was prepared and ccrtificd as a Master EIR for Subarea Industrial Arca Spcci~c Plan in 1994. Tbc California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides Ibat once a Mastcr EIR has been certified, no funbet EIR or Negative Dcclan~lion is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Master EIR. A project will be considcrcd "within the scope" of the Maslcr EIR if it is described within the document and will: I. t lave no additional significant effect on the environment that was not identified in IJlc Master EIR and 2. Rcquire no new or additional mitigation mcasurcs or altcrnativcs. Slafrcomple[cd the Initial Study Pa~ 1[ and dc~cnnlncd Ibc project is within thc scopc office Mas(cr EIR for Subarca 18 and that no additional significant cffccts, mitigation mcasurcs, or allcrnativcs arc required. 1lie appropriate Findings arc included it~ the atlachcd Resolution of Approval. CORI~ESPONDENCE: Notices of Public t lcaring have been scn~ Io surr~undh~g propc~y owners and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting a~ Ihc sile has also bccn cornpitied. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map 15350 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, Dan Jamc Senior Civil Engineer Aliachinches: Vicinily Map (Exhibit "A") Tunlativc Map (Exhibit "1~") Master Plan (gxbibi~ Planning Arca VIII (Exhibit "D") Initial Study Pan II Resolution and Rccommcndud Conditions of Approval 8th STREET 6th STREET STREET . VICINITY MAP N.T.S. N CITY OF . rrgM: PADCEL NAF/SBNO ~ANC. H0 CUC~0NGA ~ V/C/N/TK KAP ~G~~G D~ON ~~: '~ '~ PLANNING AREA VIII HA]OR PROJECF MINOR PARCEL GATEWAY TREATMENT ENTRY TREATMENT GOLF COURSE EDGE TREATMENT- PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENT MA3OR PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENT Mastcr Plan Planning Areas VIII N C 1TY 0 F . rr~.- P~41~CEL N,4P 15,,~_~0 4~RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrL~.,. N,4 5 TEi~ PL,4Af ENG~G DIVISION XHIBI~. ~ C t/ Concepru,ql Land Use Plan RANCHO CUCA1VIONGA ENGIN'Ek'~rNG DIVISION EXI-FmiT:~__~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review 99-39, Tenlative Parcel Map 15350, and Tentative Parcel Map 15346 2. Related Files: Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18 (adopted July 1994); Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and General Dynamics Corporalion recorded on Oclober 24,1994 (documen~ #94432407). 3. Description of Project: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-39 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES -A Master Plan for lhe development o~' Planning Area 8 and a portion of Planning Area 10 of the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan, Idealed on Ihe west side of Milliken. north of 4th Street and 7Ih Street, respeclively -APN: 210-082-48 and 210-272-18. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15350 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES - A subdivision of 22,49 acres of land inlo 9 parcels in the MIxed Use designalien of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located at the soulhwest corner of M~lhken Avenue and 6th Street - APN: 210-082o48. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15346 - GENERAL OYNAMICS PROPERTIES - A subdivision of 9.2 acres of land into 2 parcels in ~he Mixed Use designation of the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located on Ihe west side of Anaheim Place and Azusa Coud. nodh of 6th Street - APN: 209-272-18. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Addre:as: General Dynamics Propedies. Inc. 3270 inland Empire Boulevard, Suite 440, Ontario. CA 91764 (909) 484-4800 5. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use 6. Zoning: Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Users and Setting: The subject sile consists of 2 of the 11 Planning Areas within the Empire Lakes Subarea 18. The ~rsl area. Planning Area 8. is located on the southwest corner of 61h Streel and Milliken Avenue. To the north and south is vacant land, to the east is industrial development. and to the west is the Empire Lakes Golf Course. The second area, Planning Area 10. is located southwest of Milliken Avenue and the Me~rolink commuter rail station. To the north is the active passenger rail line. to the south is vacan~ land, to the east is industrial development, and ~o the west is the Empire Lakes Golf Course. The subjecl sile contains vineyards and undeveloped land. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 153.46 Page 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rebecca Van Buren, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10, Other agencies whose approval Is required: N/A ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by Ibis project, involving at least one impact (hat is "Potentially Significan( Impact." "Polentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." or "Less Than Significan( Impact" as indicaled by the checklist on the following pages. ! ( ) Land Use and Planning (X) Transportallen/Circulation ( ) Public Sen'ices ( ) Popuradon and Housing ( ) Biological Resources (X) U[.I,lies and Service Sy~,lems (X) Geologic.3l Problems { ) Energy and Mineral Resources Aeslhelics (X) ',,valet ( ) Haz. ards Cullural Resources (X) Air Quality (X} Noise Recreation (X) Manclalory F,ndlngs of S~gm6cance OETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a signi6canl effect on Ihe environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that allhough lhe proposed projecl could have a slgnificanl effecl on the environmenl. there will not be a signi~canl effect in this case because the minigallon measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the projecl. or agreed Io. by the applicanL A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared, ( } I find that the proposed project MAY have a significanl effect on the environment. and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I lind that ihe proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environmenl. bul at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards. and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheels, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. but musl analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 15346 Page 3 ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significam effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1 ) have been analyzed adequately in a previous EIR pursuant to applicable standards. and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuam to that previous EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures Ihat are imposed upon the proposed project. (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on Ihe environment, the proposed project will have no additional significant effect on the environment thal was not identified in the Masler EIR previously certified for the profeel site and that no new or additional mitigation measures or allernatives are required. The proposed projecl was described in and is within the scope of Ihe project covered by the Master EIR. No new EIR or Negative Declaration is required for the proposed project pursuant to Section 21157 of the ' ~///,~, Pub,,ffaurces Coddle Signed: Rebecca Van Buren Associale Planner August 5. 1999 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant Io Section 15063 o[ Ihe California Environmental Quality Acl Guidelines. an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impacl." "Potentially Significanl Impacl Unless M~ligalion Incorporaled." and "Less Than Signi~canl Impacr' answers, including a discussion o~ ways to miligate the significanl effects identified. 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING, Would the proposal: a) Con~icl wilh general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (x) b) Conflict with applicable envlronmenlal plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiclion over Ihe profeel? ) ( ) (x) c) Be incompatible with exisling land use in the vicinily? ) ( ) (x) d) Disrupl or divide Ihe physical arrangemenl of an established communily? ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-d) The project is consistent with the land use and planning prowsions o~ Ihe Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Speci6c Plan, The profeel site presently consists of vineyards and undeveloped land. The Master Environmental Impact Roped (Masler EIR) for the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 idenlified Ihe removal of active vineyards onsile as a signi~canl, unavoidable impact associated with the developmenl of the project sile Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350, & TPM 15346 Page 4 under the Subarea SpeciGc Plan. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City in 1994 in conjunction with certi~calion ot the Master FIR. 2. POPULATION ANO HOUSING, Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Induce substantial growth in an area eilher direcfiy or indirectly (e.g., through projecls in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ) (x) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) ( ) ) (x) 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Wouldlheproposalresultin or expose people to potential irr2pacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ( ) ( ) (x) b} Seismic ground shaking? ( ( ) ( ) (x) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( d} Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( } ( ) ( ) (x) 0 Erosion, changes in Iopography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) g} Subsidence of Ihe land? ( ) ( } ( ) (x) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) i} Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: 0 The project involves grading to develop pad siles and s~reets. The topography the site will be altered to allow the lots to drain to the new public streels, where runelf will be conveyed to approved drainage facilities. The design of the project site and construction of lhe proposed grading and structures shall follow the recommendations ot the soils engineer and shall comply wilh the currenl building standards and codes at Ihe time of construction. The recommendations of the Final Soils Engineering Investigation Repeal shall be incorporated into the project design Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 15346 Page 5 with pertinent information noted on the final Grading Plan which shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official prior to issuance of grading permits. 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface wa~er runoff? ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to wa~er relaled hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) (x) c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface wa~er quality (e.g., lemperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidily)? ( ) ( ) (x) d) Changes in the amount o1' sudace water in any water body? ( ) ( ) (x) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction or water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) O Change in the quantity of ground waters. either Ihrough direct additions or withdrawals, or Ihrough interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or Ihrough substantial loss of groundwaler recharge capabihty? ( ) (x) g) Altered direction or rate of flow el groundwater? ( ) (x) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ) (x) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ) (x) Comments: a) The Master EIR indicates various storm drain improvements will be installed, as development of the Specific Plan progresses. to convey the post-development on- site storm flows into the existing storm drain facilities adjacent to the site. The proposed storm drain facilities will be sized and located to conform to the City's current storm flow conveyance policy. Tentative Parcel Map 15350 includes an interim drainage de-silting basin, low-flow pipe, and rip-rap on the parcel south of the subject site to accommodate surface flows until the properties Io lhe south are developed. Identified mitigation measures in the Master EIR require compliance with applicable storm water quality requirements. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 15346 Page 6 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposah a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute Io an existing or projected air qualily violation? (x) ( ) ) ( ) b) Expose sensilive receptors to pollutanls? ( ) ( ) ) (x) c) Alter air movement, moislure, or lemperature. or cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a) The Master EIR identified the increases in emissions from grading, equipment, and vehicles associaled with conslruction in the projecl area will result in excesses of lhe South Coast Air Quality Management Oislrict thresholds of significance. Numerous air quality mitigation measures are adopted in the Master EIR. which are also applicable to this project (use low-emission fuel, develop a trip reduction plan, dust suppression, suspend grading during smog alerts, and others). However, even with miligation. air qualily impacts are identified as signi6canl. unavoidable impacts associated wilh the development of the project site under the Subarea Specific Plan. A Statemenl of Overriding Consideraliens was adopied by the City in 1994 in conjunction wilh certi~calion o1 the Masler EIR. 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or lraffic congeslion? (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design lealures (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompalible uses (e.g.. farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Inadequate emergency access or access ~o nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Insufficient parking capacily on-site or off-siIe? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclisls? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) 0 Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportalion (e,g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 15346 Page 7 Comments: a) The Master EIR includes a delailed discussion of traffic and circulation based upon a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for lhe project. Subsequent development projects within Specific Plan are required to contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's adopted traffic impact fee program (Transportation Development Impact Fee Ordinance No. 445) as the project's fair share contribution to circulation improvemenls idenlified as necessary al the time of issuance of building permils. The Master EIR concludes the Subarea Specific Plan will incrementally contribute Io significant adverse cumulalive impacts on lhe regional circulation system. As a result. continued developmenl in the region combined wilh the developmenl of the proposed project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts on the regional circulation system, A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by lhe City in 1994 in conjunction wilh cerlification of the Master EIR. ...... ..... ' 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES, Would the proposal result in impacts to.' a) Endangered, Ihrealcned, or rare species or their habilats (including. bul not rimiled to: plants. fish. insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Locally designated species (e g, heritage frees. eucalyptus windrow. elc)';' ( ) ) ( ) (x) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyplus grove, sage scrub habilat, e/c)? ( ) ( (x) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh. riparian, and vernal pool)? ( ) ( (x) e) V~ldlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( (x) Comments: a) The Master EIR includes a biological assessment of plant communilies. wildlife and plant species, and wildlife habi~als presenL Focused su~eys [or the Delhi Sands flower loving fly. San Diego horned lizard, and orange-throated whiptail were conducled and indicate Ihal no significant habital will be impacted by the developmenl of lhe project. The project sile has been subs/anlially disturbed from decades of agricultural activities. In addilion, Ihe project site is isolated from impotent natural open space areas, receives human disturbance, and lacks native plant communities. The Master EIR stales lhal no significant impacts on biological resources will result from construction of the project site: lhercfore. no mitigation measures are recommended lot biological resources onsile. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 153.46 Page 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposak a) Conflict with adopied energy conservalion plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Resull in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to Ihe region and the residenls of lhe State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, bul not limilcd Io: oil. pesticicles. chemicals. or radialion)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) The creation ot any heallh hazard or polenlial heallh hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (×) d) Exposure of people Io existing sources of potenlial heallh hazards? ( ( ) ( ) (x) e) Increased fire hazard in areas wilh fiammable brush, grass. or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in.' a) Increases in exisling noise levels? ( ) (x) ( ( ) b) Exposure of people Io severe noise eve s? ( ) (x) ( ( ) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 15346 Page 9 Comments: a & b) The Master EIR includes noise mitigation measures applicable to this project to address temporary short-term construction noise impacts and cumulative traffic. rail. and stationary source noise on the outdoor golf course areas. The Master EIR concludes implementation of Ihe recommended mitigation measures will reduce potential noise impacts to a level Ihat is considered less than significant. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas.' a} Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x} b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d} Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) OIher governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Wou/d Ihe proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following ut,l, ties.' a) Power or natural gas? ) (x) b) Communication systems? ) (x) c) Local or regional water Ireatmenl or distribution facilities? ) (x) d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) 0 Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( } (x) g) Local or regional water suppries? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: e) Storm drain improvements will be installed as development progresses to convey the posFdevelopment on-site slorm flows into the existing storm drain facilities. This impact is not considered to be significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39, TPM 15350, & TPM 15346 Page 10 13, AESTHETICS, Would the proposah a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ,..,....,,, ..... , ..., 14, CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.' a) Disturb paleontologlcal resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( } (x) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cullural values? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses wl[hln the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal.' a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or olher recrealional facililies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39, TPM 15350, & TPM 15346 Page 11 ,..--...-,--,-,.-.,- ....., .... 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential Io degrade Ihe quality of lhe environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a l~sh or wildlit'e species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten ~o eliminale a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict range of a rare or endangered planl or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehislory? ( ( ) ( ) (x) b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve shorl-lerm, Io the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A shorl-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relalively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well inlo the future.) ( ( ) (x) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts thai are individually limiled, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that lhe incremental elfeels of a projecl are considerable when viewed in connection wilh lhe effecls of pasl projects, the effccls of other currenl projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) (x) ( ) ( ) d) Substantial adverse: Does Ihe project have environmental effects which will cause subslantial adverse effects on human beings, ellher directly or indirectly? (x) ( ) ( ) Comments: c & d) The cumulative and substantial adverse impacls described in Ihis Initial Study consisl of Ihe loss of agricultural land, cumulative traffic, and air quality. These impacts are within the scope o1' the reporl of Ihe Master EIR. The project herein was described in the Masler EIR and will nol cause any significant effecl on the environment that was nol examined in Ihe Master EIR. The Cily adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations in 1994 in conjunction with cedification of Ihe Master EIR. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350, & TPM 15346 Page 12 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where. pursuant to the tiering. program EIR. or other CEQA process. one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effecIs ideniified above for Ihis project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards. and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The ~'ollowing earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (x) General Plan (Certified April 6. 1981) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for Ihe 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115. certified January 4. 1989) (X)Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19. 1981) (X) Subarea 18 Specific Plan Masler EIR (SCH #93102055, certified June 1, 1994) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15350. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIXTH STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-082-48 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 15350, was submitted by General Dynamics Properties, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 9 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardinc, State of California, identified as APN 210-082-48, located at the southwest corner of Sixth Street and Milliken Avenue; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 1999, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistenl with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physicall/suilable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutling properties. ~ECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information contained in an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was prepared and certified as a Master EIR for Subarea 18 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan in 1994 (SCH#93102055) and that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified, no further EIR or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Master EIR, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and require no new or additional mitigation measures or alternatives. SEGTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 15350 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Condilions and the following Special Conditions: Enqineerinq 1. Provide a drainage report which studies options of drainage alternatives as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15350 August25,1999 Page 2 a. Surface runoff discharge from public streets onto private property south of Fifth Street continuing to Fourth Street. b. Surface runoff discharge from public streets westerly to the golf course continuing to the detention basin. Drainage facilities and off-site agreements shall be provided to the satisfaction of lhe City Engineer. Off-site agreements shall be obtained prior to final parcel map approval. 2. Right-of-way for the south half of Fifth Street shall be recorded and in addition, provide rights-of-entry to grade off site for the street construction, prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 3. The south property line for Parcel 5 along the project boundan/, shall be located at the top of slope. Off-site rights-of-entn/for grading to accomplish this are required. 4. In the event development of Planning Areas 6 and 7 warrant extending Street "A' south to Fourth Street, per the initial Master Plan, the developer will be responsible for reconstructing the knuckle at Fifth Street and 'A' Street as a 'T' intersection. 5. Provide the following improvements, per the improvement certificate for Parcel 8 on Parcel Map 14647 and Exhibit "C" of Development Agreement 94-01 (Ordinance 526}: a. Realign Sixth StreelJMilliken Avenue intersection to eliminate the 12-foot centerline offset, including median, for 600 feet west of Milliken Avenue. Include all turning lanes for ultimate intersection geometrics. Reimbursement may be requested from Parcel 9 of Parcel Map 14647. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of lhe public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. b. Landscape the Sixth Street median. Reimbursement may be requested from Parcel 9 of Parcel Map 14647. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. c. Underground the existing overhead utilities on the south side of Sixth Street. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15350 August25,1999 Page 3 6. Individual parcels within Tentative Parcel Map 15350 will be conditioned to pay the following fees, per Exhibit "D" of Development Agreement 94-01 (Ordinance 526), upon development: a. Transportation Development fees. b. A contribution in lieu of construction for the Milliken Avenue median as outlined in City Council Resolution 89-574. Since there is an inflation clause in this resolution, the Developer could opt to pay with the final map and spread the cost among nine parcels rather than four parcels. 7. Milliken Avenue shall be improved to "Major Divided Arterial" standards, including street lights, traffic signs, and traffic striping: a. Provide a 200-foot right turn lane southbound on Milliken Avenue at the Fifth Street intersection. ~' ~' ........' ...............: .......: ...........for nc,~hb~::F,d ~ ,¢'. Provide a standard bus bay south of Sixth Street. c x~. Modify the Milliken Avenue/Sixth Street traffic signal as required for the intersection realignment. d,(. Provide R26(S) "No Stopping" signs. c~. No ddveway access from individual parcels. 8. Sixth Street shall be improved to "Major Divided Arterial" standards, including street lights, traffic signs, and traffic striping: a. Provide a right turn lane eastbound on Sixth Street starting 150 feet west of "A" Street and continuing to the Milliken Avenue intersection. b. Provide R26(S) "No Stopping" signs. c. No driveway access from individual parcels. 9. Sixth Street and "A" Street shall be installed full width, to "Local Industdar' standards (including street lights, traffic signs, and traffic striping): a. Fifth Street shall align with existing Fifth Street east of Milliken Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15350 August25,1999 Page 3 6. Individual parcels within Tentative Parcel Map 15350 will be conditioned to pay the following fees, per Exhibit "D" of Developmet Agreement 94-01 (Ordinance 526), upon development: a. Transpodation Development fees. b. A contribution in lieu of construction for the Millike venue median as outlined in City Council Resolution 89 Since there is an inflation clause in this resolution, Developer could opt to pay with the final map and among nine parcels rather than four parcels. 7. Milliken Avenue shall be improved to "Me Divided Arterial" standards, including street lights, traffic sign : striping: a. Provide a 200-foot right turn lan~ ;outhbound on Milliken Avenue at the Fifth Street interse( b. Provide a left turn pocket in the median for northbound traffic at the Fifth Street inter,. c. Provide a standard bus of Sixth Street. d. Modify the Milliken AvE :/Sixth Street traffic signal as required for the intersection nment. e. Provide R26(S) "i' Stopping" signs. f. No driveway a~ individual parcels. 8. Sixth Slreet shall Improved to "Major Divided Arterial" standards, including street traffic signs, and traffic striping: a. Provide ight turn lane eastbound on Sixth Street starting 150 of "A" Street and continuing to the Milliken Avenue b. R26(S) "No Stopping" signs. c. o driveway access from individual parcels. 9. ;treet and "A" Street shall be installed full width, to "Local standards (including street lights, traffic signs, and traffic ~triping): a. Fifth Street shall align with existing Fifth Street east of Milfiken Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15350 August 25, 1999 Page 4 b. Provide R26 "No Parking" signs. c. Driveways shall be in accordance with City standards. 10. Street trees and parkway landscaping along Milliken Avenue and Sixth Street shall conform to the respective beautification master plans as outlined in Table 5-4 o1' the Specific Plan. Local street trees shall conform to the list of Approved Street Trees for Rancho Cucamonga. 11. An infrastructure phasing plan shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the recordation of the Final Parcel Map. The phasing plan shall include the sequence of public improvements based on the potential build-out of Parcel Map No. 15350. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buffer, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission oi' the City of* Rancho Cucamonga, do the Planning Commission held on the 25th day o~ August 1999. by the following vote-'~ -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15350 Those items checked nre Cnndition~ of Approval. A. De<lications and Vehicular Access ..XX I. Rights-of-way and cascmcnts shall bc dedicated to the City forall interior public streets, cornmunity trails, public paseos, publ ic landscape areas. street trccs. traffic signal encroachment and maintenance and public drainage Facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local fccdcr trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plims and/or tentative map. __ 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way for the perimeter streets (measured from siroct centerline): · total fcct on total fcct on total feet on total feel 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway purposcs shall bc made for tile prlvatc streets. X 4. Corner property line culoffs shall bc dedicated per City Standards. ~ 5. Vehicular access rights shall bc dedicated to the City for the follov,.ing streets. except for approved openings: 6a' Street, "A" Street, ,'i'h .'Street anti Millikcn Avetalc ~ 6. Reciprocal access casements shall bc provided ensuring access to all parcels by C C & R's or by deeds and shall bc recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel map. ~ 7. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and malntcnancc agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads. drives, or parking areas shall be provklcd by C C & t{'s or deeds and shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the [it~al parcel map. X 8. All existing casements lying within future right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the final parcel map per the City Englneer's requirements. ~ 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public righbof-way shilll be dedicated to the City. I 0. Private drainage casements for cross-lot drainage shall bc provided and shilII hc delineated or noted on the final parcel map. I I. Additional sireel right-of-way shall bc dcdicatcd along right turn luncs and bus bay. to provide a minimum o~'7 I'cct mcasurcd from the fact: of curbs. If curb adiacent sidewalk is used along the right turn I;mc. a parallel strcet tree caserncnt shall bc provided. The developer shah make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary In construct the required punic improvements and. if hc/shc should fail to do so. the developcr shall at Icast 120 days prior to subminaI of the final parcel map for approval. enter into an agreement to complctc the improvements pursuant Io Govcrnmcnt Code Section 6&162 at such time as tbc City acqulrcs the property interests required for the improvcmcnls. Such agreement shall provide for payment by ~c dcvclopcr of all costs incu~cd by ~hc City to acquire the ofl~si~c propc~y interests required in connection with lhc subdivision. Security for a potion of these cosIs shall be in the form of a c~h deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report oblaincd by (he developer. at ~cvclopcr's COSL ~c appraiser shall have been approvcd by Ihe City prior to commcnccmcn~ of the appraisal. This condition applies in pa~icular. but not limited to: 5'~ Strecl Strect hnprnvemcnts ~X 1. All public improvements, (interior streets, drainage facilities, comn~unity trails. pascos, landscaped areas, etc. ) shown on the plans and/or tcntative map shall bc constructed to City Standards. lntcrior street improvements shall include. but are not Iimilcd to. curb and gutlcr, AC pavcment, drive approaches, sidcwalks, street lights, and strcct trccs. __ 2. A minimum. of 26-foot wide pavement wilhin a 40- foot wide dcdicalcd right-of-way shall be constructcd for all half-section strccts, X 3. Construct the following missing pcrimcler sircut inlprovcmcnts inc[uding. but nol liralied [o: "A" STREI~ X X X X X X dclcnnim:d during plan check. (c) If so marked. sldcwalk will bc curvilincat pet STD. 1~114. (d) If so m~kcd. M in-lieu ofconst~clion fcc shall ~ providcd for ~his i~cm. (c) R26 (S) "No S~upping" sign~ (~ Bus bay 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement pl.ms including sircot trees. slrcct lights and inlcrscction satcry lights on future signal poles. and ~raffic signal plans shall bc prepared by a registered Civil Enginccr and shall bc 2 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final parcel map approval. b. Prior to any work being performed in tbe public right-of-way. fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtaincd from the City Enginccr's office in addition to any other pcmfits required. c. Pavement striping. marking. traffic signing, strcct name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit sirall be installed to the satisfaction of tire City loginter. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with airy new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes sirall be placed on both sides of tire street at 3 feet outside of [3CR, ECR or any other locations approvcd by tile City Engineer. e. I tandicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intcrscctlons per City Slandards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction sball remain open to traffic at all liners with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permils are required. A cash deposit sirall bc provided to cover tile cost of grading and paving. which shall bc refunded upon complelion construction to tire satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows sirall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residenlial lots. h. Street names shall be approvcd by the City Planner prior to subntittal for first plan check. approval by the City Engineer. Prior to airy v,'ork being performed on the privalc sitters, fees shall bc paid and construelion permits shall be obtained frum the City Engmcer's office in addition Io any other pcnnils required. X 6. Street trees, a nfinintum of 15 - gallon size or larger shall bc installed per CRy Standards in accordance with the City's street trcc program. ,X 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall bc rcvicv,'cd by the City Engineer for conformante witit adopied policy. On collector or larger street, lines ofsighl shall be plotled for all project intersections. including driveways. L~calrcsidcn~alstr~tint~sccti~nsandc~n~nrcrcia~rindustr~ald~iv~waysmayhavelin~s of sight plolicd as rcqulrcd. 8. A Pertall shall be obtained froin CALTRANS for any work within d~e following right-of-way: __ 9. All public improvements on tbc following streets shall bc operationally co:npictc prior to the issuance of building pcrn~its. C. I"uhlic ~,l:~h~temmce Area,; ._N_X I. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans pcr gngincering Public Works Slandards sisal · 'C'yE g,nccrforrcvlcvandappr,.~vaiprior/o~n;,lparcclmapapproval. Thc'f~4ow~n(~.%~® pasco's. ca,e ent.. trai,.. or ot,,er area. s,,;,,, be annexed ,n,o f / landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements. trails. or other areas shall be into the Landscape Maintenance District: 6u~ Street Median and Milliken Avenue Median Reconstruction 2. Public landscape areas are required to/ncorporatc substantial areas of monared cobble or othcr acceptable non-irrigaled surfaces. 3. A signed consent and waiver fomT~ to join and/or form the a pc and Lighting Districts shah be filed with the City Engineer prior to final parcel ma Fom~adon costs shale be borne by the developer. 4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems s bc continuously rnainlaincd by the developer until accepted by the City. 5. Parkwaylandscapingonthcfollowing rcsuhsofthurespcctivcBcauti~cadon Master Plan: Milliken Avenue and 6~' Street Drainage and Flood Conlrnl 1. The project (or portions tbercoO is ed within a Flood Ilazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as i a registered Civil Engineer and approvcd by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the dcvclopcr's rcspons to have the current FIRM Zone. , designation removed from the project area. The dcve cnginccr shall prepare all ncccssa~ reports. plans. and hydrologic/hydraulic calculati~ A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtalncd from FEMA, prior to final A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEM/,. prior to occupancy nprovcmcnt acceptance. wbichcvcr occurs first. 3. A final dralnagc study sh,' : submitted to and approvcd by tbc City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. All drainage I rides shall be installed as required by the City Englnecr. 4. Adequate provisions: I1 bc made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage cnlcring the propcny from adjacent areas. 5. A permit from the ~ Bernardinn County Flood Control District is required for work within it's right-of- 6. Trees arc }ted within 5 fcct of the outside dlamctcr of any public slonn drain pipe measured from thc ~ fa mature tree Irunk. 7. Public: n drain casements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event ofblockagc in a sump catch basin i '~ubllc street. }letinn I. required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map. an ,rovemeat security accompanied by an agreement cxcculcd by the Developer nnd the City will bc .~ircd for: .6"' Street, "A" .Slrcc , 5°' S rcc ant M ikcn Ave. - curb/gultcr, A.G. pavemeal, slr~ct lighls, storm drain .syslcm% undergrolm lag ofcx s ng overhead utiliIics nnd n~cdian lan< sc ping J landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 6th Street Median,a(a4~-~il;l~n'~F~,r~'rll~..Mf~ian .~gae ~ X 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. X 3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. __X 4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. ___X 5. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beauti~cation Master Plan: Milliken Avenue and 6th Street D. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA, prior to final parcel map approval. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. X 3. A f'mal drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to f'mal parcel map approval. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. ~ 4. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. __ 5. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control Distxict is required for work within it's right-of- way. X 6. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. .XX 7. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event ofblockage in a sump catch basin on a public street. E, Improvement Completion X 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: 6th Street, "A" Street, 5th Street and Mil iken Ave - curb/gutter, A.C. pavement~ street lights~ storm drain systems, undergrounding of existing overhead utilities and median landscaping 4 .__X 2. If ate r,:quircd public inxprovcmct~ts art: :Xol coinpitted prior to approval of the lhml pitreel mltp, improvement ccrtillcalc shal[ be placed upon the liu;d parcel illlip, slatillg that they "'.'ill be coulplctcd upo~ development I'or: Each parcel - Sidewalk, Slr~;ct Trees, lind Drlvc t'.,pllroacbcs F. Utilities X I. Provide scpaza|lc utility services Io citch p;u'ccl it|eluding similltry sewerage systcln, '.valor, gas. electric pov,'cr, Iclephouc and oldfie TV (;ill tuldcrgrouml) in accord;ulcc v,'ilh the Ulilily Shmdm'ds. sludl bc provldcd a.q required. ~ 2. Water and se',vcr phms shall be designed and col~slmctcd Io mccl requirclnc~tls of the Cucamonga C(Ittllly Walcr District (CCWD), I~,lu~cho Cucltmoffga I:irc I'rotccfon Dislricl, trod Ihc l'~nvlronlncnlal llcahh l)epartmcnl of the County of Sire |lcrnardino. A loiter of c~mlpIiancc front CCWD is rcqtdrcd Ilnal p~u'ccl amp approval. Such letter must have been issued by life Walcr l)islrlcl within 9| di,)'s prior Io final map approval in fit{.: ca.-;c o1' subdivision or prior to the issmmcc ol' i~rmils in the rcsldcnfial projects;. 3. Approvals have not bccn secured from all utililics a~td other in|crested ~tgcncics involved. Approval of the final parcel map '."'ill be subjoel Io tiny requirements thai may bc received I'roln X 4. 'l]~e developer shall be responsible for the rclocatitm of existing u61ilic:~ ~.,; nccess~u-y. G. C, eneral Rcquircmcnt~ ~,t~ll Al~|~rovah ~ I. 'lhc |curative/u;l|~ apprt~v:d i:~ valid li~r fhc 36-fllonfh ilcrlod It,llowing Ihc nl~lm~val dale. ]'line cxlcll..~ions fffily bc gr;mlcd by the I'l;,,lint: Couunissilm. if rcquc:,tcd prit~r to the cxpir:aion X 2. Tbc applicant shall agree Io dcllznd at his sole cxl~nsc ;sit>' ltclitm bnmghl against Ihc Citv |Is agents. appro",'al. lllc l:pplicant shall reimburse c Ci y, i s algcnts, ol'llccrs or cn:ph~yccs, for imy courl cosls attorllcy's I'ccs v,'hich the Cily, its agefits. olliccrs, or clnph~yccs m;Lv bc required by a courl to pay as a result o1' such act|ira. 'lllc Cily may, nl |Is sole discretion. p;trlic. iplac l:t its own expense at~y such actioi: bul such parlie|pal|on shall not relieve I~pplicant of his obligation ut~dt.-r Ihis condition. · ..XX 3. Final gradhsg plans fi~r each parcel shall be its rclluirc,.l by the Ihlildlng ~,ud Safety Division prior to issuance of grading pcnnils. __ 4. A cop)' of the Covcnanls, Col:ditions, :rod Restrictions (C C & It.'s) npprovcd by list City Attorney is required prior It) approval of Ihc Ihud paP.;',:l fillip. 32 5. An c~,~qcmcnl lilt ajoitlt use tlrivc'.v;~y .~h;lll bc pm;'idcd prillr t~ lil,iI parcel nuq~ api,ruval Ibr: |'~,rccl 7 ;uld 8 6. ['riot Io i:l:prl:vld ol' Ibc final i1;trccl m;tp a depl:sil shidl bc posfcd v,'ilh lilt Cil)' cm'cring Ihc cslimalcd cost ol' app{~rtlozllng the ;L%SCSSItlCllIS ultdcr/XSSCSSIIIClll District , alntmg the newly crcnlcd p~trccls. ~ 7. A non-rcl'und;d~lc clcposil ~h;dl bc i~aid Io lbc Cily, cnvcrlng Ibc c~tim:acd oT~r;aing cosl~ li~r MI new slrccl lighls fi~r the li~l 6/lloiiIIL~ uf o[~rallt~n, prior to final parcel m;~p appravM. 5 8. Prior to ~nalization of any development phase. sufficient improvement plans shall bc completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of tile City Engineer. Phasc boundaries shah correspond to lot lines shown oil tile approvcd tentative map. __ 9. Efiwanda/San Scvainc Area Regional Mainline. Secondary Regional, and Mastcr Plan Drainage Fccs shall bc paid prior to final parcel map approval. __ 10. Peru'fits shall bc oblalncd fronl the follo',vlng agencies for work within their right-of-way. I I. Asigned consentand waiver fonn Iojoin and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed wilh tile City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Formalion costs shall be borne by Ihe developer. 12. Prior to recordation of tile fioal parcel map, Ihe apDlicnot shall coast o, or participate in, ~hc establishment of a Mefio-Roos Community Facilities Dis~rlct for Ihc cons~rucfioo and maintenance of necessa~ school facilities. I lowcver, ifany school district has previously established such a Community Facililies District, Ih~ applicant shall, in Ihc alle~ative, coastal Io the annexation of the project site into the te~ito~ of such existing district prior to the recordafion of d~e final parcel map. Further, if the affected school dis~ict has not forn~ed a Mdlo-Roos Communily Facilities District widfin twelve months from lhc date of approval of the project and prior 1o fl~c rccordalion of the final parcel map for sa~d pro joel, this condillon shall be deemed null and void. ~is condition shall be waived if the Cily receives notice lhaI d~c applicant and aH affected school districls have entered imo an agreemeal to privately ~ccomn~od:~lc any nnd all school impacls as a result of this project. I3. Mcllo Roos Comlnunily Facilities District requirements for Ihc Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dislrlct shall apply to this project. 14. Pursuant to provisions of California Resources Code Section 21089(b), this npplicafion shall not bc operative, vested or final, nor will building pennies be issued or a map recorded, until (I) d~e Nolice of Determination ~OD) regarding lhc associated environmental action is filed and posted with Clerk of the Board of Supc~isors of the County of San Bcmardino; and (2) any and all required handling charges, arc paid to the County Clerk oflhc County of San Bcmardino. ~c applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamped copy of the NOD together with a rcccipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fccs pursuant Io the provision of the California Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, cxc~pl for paymoot of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fc~ Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Revised 9/8/98 6 CITY OF I~,ANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 25, 1999 STAFF REPORT I'0: Chairman and lvlembcrs of the Planning Conunission I:ROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Englncer SUBJECT: TENTATIVE I'AI~CF.I, MAI' 1534(, - GENI:I~.AI. I)YNA~IICS - A subdivision of 9.2 acres or land into 2 parcels in the Mixed Use dcsignatkm of tile Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located on the west side ofAnahcinl lqaee and Azusa Courl, north of 6'h Street - APN: 209- 272-18. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative l'arccI Map as shown on Exhibit "B". B. Parcel Size: Parcel I 3.49 acres P;lrccl 2 5.72 acres 9.2 1 acres C. [~xislinK Zoning: Mixed Use designation of the Subarea 18 S|~ccific Plall wifilin the Industrial Area Specific Plan. D. Surronncling I,ancl Use and ZonlntU North Mctrolink Sialion - Subarea 18 Specific Plan (Planning Area X), IASP South Vacant - Subarea 18 Specific Plan (Planning Area IX). IASP East Existing Industrial Building - Subarea 9 of the Industrial Area Specific Pla:~ West Empire Lakes Golf Course - Subarea 18 Specific Plan (l'kmning Area I-B) IASP E. Site Characteristic,s: Thc site is vacant and the propcrty is situatcd oil the west side of Anahcim Place and Azusa Court. Missing parkway improvements shall bc installed uptm dcvclolm~cnl orcach parcel. ANAI,Y~IS: The purpose of the parcel map is to subdivide into 2 parcels for future dcvclopmcnl. The applicant has provided a master plan (Exhibit "C") to show how eventual development on all parcels could occur. Said master plan was reviewed by Staff and various City dcpamncnts and was found to bc acceptable. ITEM D PLAglNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 15346 August 25. 1999 Page 2 F..NVII~.ONMENTAI, REVIE%V: An IZnvironmcntal Impact Report (EII~) was prepared and certified as a Master EII~ for Subarea I g of the h~dustrial Area Spcci tic Plan in 199-1 (SCI 1tl93102055). The Cal ilbrnia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has bccn certified, no further EII~ or Negative Decksration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Master EIR. A project will be cousldcrcd "withi, the scope" of ll~c Master EIR if it is described within the document and will: I. Have no additional slgnifican~ c/'l~ct on fl~c c,viron,~c,t [h:xl was ,or idcnfiI~cd Master EIR: and 2. Require no new or addilional miligafioo measures or altcmalivcs. Staffcompleted Ihe Initial Study Pa~ [[ and dclcrmincd the projoel is willflu Ihc scope of the Maslcr EIR for Subarea 18. The appropriate Findings arc h~cludcd in lhc auachcd Rcsolulion of Approval. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sere [o surrounding properly owners :rod pl:lccd in [he Inkrod Valley Daily I}ullclin. Pos[ing at [he site has also been completed. R [~C()N1NI EN DATI ON: Staff recommends that the Planuh~g Cornmiss:tin apl~rovc 'l'cntativc l'arcc[ Map 153.16 through adoption of the allached Rcsolutlon. Respectfully submiltcd. Senior Civil Engineer AUaclm~ents: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (ICxhlblt "H") Master Plaml (ICxhibil "C") hfi/ial Study Parl II Rcsohllion aod Rccommem~dcd Comldillons of 8th I. STREET ~ 6th 5'/~ STREET 4th ~ STREET VICINITY MAP N.T.S. N CITY OF . rr~:/='///f'CEZ NI,4f'/Sa, C'G RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tm,~.- I/I('IN/TY/V/l/:' ENGINEERING DIVISION EXI4rB~: '://~ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN TPM NO. '!5346 -,- ~..J~ : ; ~. :, -:,,:. ... ....:, ,- ~ '~ ' ~ "~ ~ ,' '~, _ = , ;. .. , ~: '. . . ~/ZZ/~E~ ~ PLANNING AREA X MINOR PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENT/~ MAJOR PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENT City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review 99-39, Tentative Parcel Map 15350, and Tentative Parcel Map 15346 2. Related Files: Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 18 (adopted July 1994): Development Agreemen~ between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and General Dynamics Corporation recorded on October 24.1994 (documenl #94432407), 3. Description of Project: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-39 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES -A Masler Plan for the developmenl of Planning Area 8 and a portion of Planning Area 10 oi' the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located on the west side o~'Milliken, north of 41h Street and 7th Sireel. respectively -APN: 210-082-48 and 210-272-18. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15350 -GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES -A subdivision o1' 22.49 acres of land into 9 parcels in the Mixed Use designation el Ihe Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located al lhe southwesl corner of M~lfiken Avenue and 61h Street - APN: 210-082-48. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15345 - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES - A subdivision of 9.2 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Mixed Use designation of Ihe Subarea 18 Specific Plan, located on the west side el Anaheim Place and Azusa Court. norlh o1' 6th Street - APN: 209-272-18. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: General Dynamics Propedies, Inc. 3270 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suile 440, Onlario. CA 91764 (909) 484-4800 5. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use 6. Zoning: Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The subject site consisis of 2 oi' the 11 Planning Areas within the Empire Lakes Subarea 18. The first area. Planning Area 8, is Iocaled on the soulhwesl corner of 61h Siroct and Milliken Avenue. To Ihe north and south is vacant land, Io the east is industrial development. and to the west is ihe Empire Lakes Golf Course. The second area, Planning Area 10. is located southwest of Milliken Avenue and ihe Metrolink commuter rail slation. To the north is the active passenger rail hne. Io lhe soulh is vacant land, to the easl is industrial development. and Io the west is the Empire Lakes Golf Course. The subiect silo contains vineyards and undeveloped land Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350, & TPM 15345 Page 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rebecca Van Buren, Associale Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: N/A ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmenial factors checked below would be polentially affected by lhis project, involving least one impact tha~ is "Po~en~ially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Miligation Incorporated," or "Less Than SigniRcant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning (X) TransporlafionlCirculallon ( ) Public Services ( ) Popufalion and Housing ( ) Biological Resources (X) Ul,l,t,es and Service Syslerns (X) Geological Problems ( } Energy and M~neral Resources ( ) Aoslhelics (X) ~'?alcr ( } Hazards ( ) Cullural Resources (X) A,r Ouahly (X) Noise ( ) Recrealion (X) Mandalory F,nd,ngs of Sign,ficanco DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find &hal the proposed project COULD NOT have a significan& effecl on the environmenl. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significanl effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because Ihe mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added Io the project. or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that Ihe proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find thal the proposed projecl MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuan~ to applicable legal standards, and 2} has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentiarly Significant impact" or "Potent/ally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350, & TPM 15346 Page 3 ( ) I find tha( although the proposed project could have a significanl effed on Ihe environment. there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1 ) have been analyzed adequately in a previous EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that previous EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, (X) I find Ihat although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, the proposed project will have no additional significant effecl on the environment that was not identified in the Master EIR previously certified for the project site and that no new or addilional millgallon measures or allernatives are required. The proposed project was described in and is within the scope of lhe projecl covered by the Master EIR. No new EIR or Negalive Declaration is required for the proposed project pursuant Io Section 21157 of Signed: Rebecca Van Buren Associate Planner August 5, 1999 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the Calilornia Environmenial Quality Act Guidelines. an explanation is required for all "Polenfially Significanl Impeel." "Potenlially Significant Impact Unless M~tigalion Incorporaled." and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers. including a discussion of ways Io mitigate Ihe significant elfeels identified. ,..,..., 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Confiicl wilh general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (x) b) Confiicl wilh applicable environmenial plans or policies adopied by agencies with jurisdiclion over Ihe project? ( ) ( ) (x) c) Be incompatible wilh existing land use in the vicinily? ( ) ( ) (x) d) Disrupt or divide lhe physical arrangement el an eslablished community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-d) The project is consistent wilh Ihe land use and planning provisions of the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 Specific Plan. The project site presenIly consisis el vineyards and undeveloped land. The Master Environmenial Impact Report (Master EIR) for the Empire Lakes Subarea 18 idenlified Ihe removal el active vineyards onsite as a significant. unavoidable impact associaled with the development of the project site Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39, TPM 15350, & TPM 15345 Page 4 under the Subarea Specific Plan. A Slatement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City in 1994 in conjunction with certi~calion of Ihe Master EIR. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposak a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local populalion projections? ( ) ) ( ) (x) b) Induce substanlial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infraslructure)? ( ) ) ( ) (x) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) ) ( ) (x) 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in Or expose people to potential impacts involving' a) Faull rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Seismic ground shakrng? ( ) ) ( ) (x) c) Seismic ground failure. including liquefaction? ( ) ) ( ) (x) d) Selche hazards? ( ) ) ( ) (x) e) Landslides or mudtlows? ( ) ( ) (x) O Erosion, changes in Iopography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation. grading, or fill? ( ) (x) ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) (x) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) (x) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: f) The project involves grading to develop pad sites and sireels. The topography of the site will be alltrod Io allow Ihe lots Io drain Io the new public sireels, where runoff will be conveyed to approved drainage facililies. The design of Ihe project silo and construction of lhc proposed grading and structures shall follow the recommendaliens of Ihe soils engineer and shall comply with the curtoni building standards and codes at the time of construction. The recommendations of the Final Soils Engineering Investlgalion Report shall be incorporated into the project design Dct Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350, & TPM 15346 Page 5 with pertinent information noted on the final Grading Plan which shall be reviewed and applered by the Building Official prior lo issuance of grading permits. 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) (x) ) ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ) (x) c) Discharge into surface water or other allelation of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or lurbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) Changes in currents. or the course or direction of water movements? ) ( ) ( ) (x) r) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either lhrough direct additions or wilhdrawals, or Ihrough interception of an aquifer by culs or excavations, or Ihrough subslanlial loss of groundwater recharge capabd~ly? ( ) ( ) (x) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwaler? ( ) ( ) (x) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) (x) i) Substanlial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a) The Master FIR indicales various slorm drain improvemenls will be installed. as developmenl of lhe Specific Plan progresses. [o convey the posl-developmenl on- site storm flows into The existing storm drain facilities adjacenl ~o lhe site. The proposed storm drain facilities will be sized and Iocaled to conform Io Ihe Cily's currenl storm flow conveyance policy. Tonialive Parcel Map 15350 includes an inlerim drainage de-silting basin. low-flow pipe. and rip-rap on Ihe parcel south of the subject site Io accommodale surface flows until the properties to Ihe south are developed. Identil~ed mltlgalion measures in the Master EIR require compliance wilh applicable storm water quality requiremenls. :DIG Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350, & TPM 15345 Page 6 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.' a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violalion? (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Expose sensitive receplors ~o pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climale? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Crea~e objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a) The Master EIR idenlil'ied the increases in emissions from grading, equipment. and vehicles associatedwith construction in ihe projecl area will resull in excesses oflhe South Coast Air Quality Managemen~ Dislrict thresholds of significance. Numerous air quality mitigation measures are adoplod in the Master EIR, which are also applicable Io this project (use low-emission fuel, develop a trip reduction plan. dust suppression, suspend grading during smog ale,ls, and olhers). However, even with mitigation, air quality impacts are idenlified as significant, unavoidable impacts associated with the development el Ihe project si~e under the Subarea Speci6c Plan. A SIalemenl el Overriding Considerations was adopied by the City in 1994 in conjunction with cedi6cation of the Masler EIR. 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle ~rips or tra~'fic congestion? (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) b) Hazards to safely from design features (e,g., sharp curves or dangerous inlersections) or incompatible uses leg., larm equipment)? ( ) ( } ( ) (x) c) Inadequale emergency access or access Io nearby uses? ( ) ( ) (x) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-silo or ell-site? ( ) ( ) (x) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) (x) O Conflicts with adopied policies supporting alternalive transportalien (e.g. bus lurnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) (x) g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 15346 Page 7 Comments: a) The Master EIR includes a detailed discussion of traffic and circulation based upon a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the project, Subsequent development projects within Specific Plan are required to contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's adopted Iraffic impact fee program (Transportallen Development Impact Fee Ordinance No. 445) as the projecrs fair share contribution Io circulalion improvements identified as necessary at the time of issuance of building permits. The Master EIR concludes the Subarea Specific Plan will incrementally contribute to significant adverse cumulative impacts on Ihe regional circulation system. As a result. continued development in the region combined with Ihe development of the proposed project would result in signi~canl and unavoidable impacts on the regional circulation system. A Statement of Overriding Consideraliens was adopted by the City in 1994 in conjunction with certificalion of the Master EIR, 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered. threatened. or rare species or their habitats (including. but not liralied to: planls. fish. insects. animals. and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Locally designated species (e g. heritage trees. eucalyptus windrow. elc,)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Locally alesignaled nalural cornmunilies (e.g . eucalyptus grove. sage scrub habilat. elc.)? ( ) (x) d) Wetland habitat (e.g.. marsh, riparian. and vernal pool)? ( ) (x) e) Wildlife dispersal or migralion corridors? ( ) (x) Comments: a) The Master EIR includes a biological assessment of plan~ communities. wildlife and plant species. and .,,vildhfe habila[s present. Focused surveys for the Delhi Sands flower loving fly. San Diego horned lizard. and orange-lhroated whiploll were conducted and indicate Ihal no signi~canl hobliar will be impacted by the development of the projecl. The projecl site has been subslantially dislurbed from decades of agricultural activities. In addition. the project site is isolated from important natural open space areas. receives human disturbance. and lacks native plant communities. The Masler EIR states that no significanl impacts on biological resources will result from construction of the project s~le; therefore. no mitigalion measures are recommended for biological resources onsile, DIP, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga OR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 15346 Page ;:;:-? .-::::::-, 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposak a} Conflict wilh adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( } ( } ( ) (x) c) Result in lhe loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of fulure value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidenlal explosion or release of hazardous subslances (~ncluding. but nol limi[ed to: oil, pesticides. chemicals. or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( } ( ) (x} c} The creation of any health hazard or potenlial health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( (x) e) Increased fire hazard in areas with fiammable brush, grass. or trees? ( } ( } ( ) (x) 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in.' a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) (x) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise eve s? ( ) (x) ( ) Initial Study ~or City of Rancho Cucamonga DR 99-39. TPM 15350. & TPM 15345 Page 9 Comments: a & b) The Master EIR includes noise mitigation measures applicable ~o this projecl to address temporary short-term conslruction noise impacts and cumulalive irai'fic. rail. and stalionary source noise on the ouldoor golf course areas. The Master EIR concludes implemenlafion of the recommended mitigation measures will reduce potential noise impacts ~oa level Ihat is considered less than significant. ..... ...... 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire proteclion? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Mainlenance of public facilities. including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) Olher governmenial services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utahties: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) ) (x) b) Communication systems? ( ) ) (x) c) Local or regional water treatment or dislribulion facilities? ( ) ) (x) d) Sewer or seplic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) e) Storm waler drainage? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) 0 Solid wasle disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: e) Storm drain improvements ,,',,ill be installed as development progresses Io convey Ihe post-development on-silo sierra flows into lhe existing storm drain I'acil~lies. This impact is not considered to be signi6cant. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15346, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ANAHEtM PLACE AND AZUSA COURT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-18 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 15346, was submitted by General Dynamics Properties, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN 209-272-18, located on the west side of Ariahelm Place and Azusa Court; and WHEREAS, on August 25, 1997, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physicaliy suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substanlial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information contained in an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was prepared and certified as a Masler EIR for Subarea 18 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan in 1994 (SCH#93102055) and that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master EIR has been certified, no further EIR or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope oi' the Master EIR, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence thai the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and require no new or additional mitigation measures or alternatives. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 15346 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions: APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15346 August25,1999 Page 2 BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller. Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed. and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of August 1999. by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL lVlAP NO. 15346 Thnsc items checked arc Conditinns of Approval. A. Dcdicatinns and Vehicular Access __ I. Rights-of-way and casements sitall bc dedicated to tile City for all interior public streets, cotnmunity trails. public paseos, public landscape areas. street trees. traffic signal encroachattar attd nlaintcoancc and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative rnap. Private casements for non-public facilitics (cross-lot drainage, local fccdcr trails, etc.) shall bc rcscrvcd as shov,'n oil the plans and/or tentative map. __ 2. Dedication shall be made of tile following rights-of-way for thc pcrimctcr streets (measured from strcct centerline): total feet on total fcet on total feet on total feet on __ 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway purposcs shall bc made for tile privale streets. __ 4. Comer propcity line cutoffs shall bc dcdlcatcd per City Standards. 5. Vchicular access rights shall be dcdicalcd to the Cily for the following streets, except for approved openings: __ 6. RcciprocaI access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by C C & R's or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to or concurt'cat with the final parcel map. ~X 7. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint mainlenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall bc provided by C C & R's or dccds and shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel map. ~ 8. All existing casements lying within future right-of-way arc to bc quilclairncd or dcl' cared on the final parcel map per tile City Engineer's requirements. __ 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public rig~ of-way shall be dedicated to tile City. 10.Private drainage casements for cross-for drainage shall be provided and shall bc dclit final parcel map. I I. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lancs, to provide a minimum of 7 fcct measured from tile face of curbs. [fcurb adjacent sidewalk is used along tile right tam lan~.~.a pa~ilel street tree eascmcnt shall bc provided. "~,.,~ l 12. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements and. if he/she should fail to do so. the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final parcel map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete tile improvements pursuant to Govemrncnt Code Section 66462 at such time as the. property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for I developer of all costs incun'ed by the City to acquire tile off-site property interests required in con with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the forIll of a cash de amount given in an appraisal report obtained by Ihe developer, at dcvclopcr's cost. TIle ~ shall have been approvcd by Ihe City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This lilts in particular, but not limited Io: B. Street hnproven~cnts __ I. All public improvements, (interior strccts, drainage facililics paseos, landscaped areas, etc. ) shown on tile plans and/or lentalive map shall bc const~ Io City Standards. Inlerior street improvements shall include, but arc not limited tc~ uucr, AC pavemcnt, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. __ 2. A nlinlmum, of26-foot widcpavcmcnt within a4, dedlcatcd right-of-way shall bc consm.~cted for all half-section strcels. X 3. Construct the followin ~rovc ncnls including. but not limited to: Strcct NIiillc Curb AC Side- ri~c Street Street Curere. Mcdl;m thkc Other / of cons Fee shall ,rovcnlcnt IHans and Construction: a. Strcct improvement plans including siroct trccs. street lights and intersection safety lights on futurc signal poles, and traffic signal phms shall bc prepared by a registered Civil Englnccr and shall be submitted to and approvcd by the City Engineer. Security shall bc posted and an agreement cxccutcd 2 __ 12. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements and, if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final parcel map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: B. Street Improvements __ 1. All public improvements, (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc. ) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. __ 2. A minimum, of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40- foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb AC Side- Drive Sneet SUeet Comm. Median Bike Other & Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Gutter ANAHEIM PLACE X X ~ X AZUSA COURT X X ~ X ~-------__~ ~ Notes: (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconsUuction and overlays will be determined during plan cheek. (c) If so marked, sidewalk will be curvilinear per STD. #114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu ofcons~a'uction fee shall be provided for this item. __ 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees, street lights and intersection safety lights on fume signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed 2 to the satisfaction of the City Eng neer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements. prior to final parcel map approval. b. Prior to any ',york being pcrfomlcd in Ihc public right-of-way, fccs shall bc paid and a construction perufit shall bc obtained from the City Enginecr's office in addition to any other petalits rcquircd. c. Pavement striping. marking. tra~c signing. siroct name signing, traffic signal conduit. and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Enginccr. d. Signal conduit with pull boxcs shall bc installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary slrccts and at intersections for future traffic signals and inlcrconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of thc sircot at 3 fcct outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approvcd by Ihc City Enginccr. specified by the City l!nginccr. (2) Cmlduil shall b~ 3-il c (n crsccli~ Ils). or 2-inch (along siteta) galvnnizcd steel ~,ith e. t landicappcd access ramps shall bc inslallcd on all comers of intcrscclions per City Slandards or as direclcd by thc City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring consmucllon shall remain open to Iraf~c at all times with adcquato detours during conslruction. Street or lane closure pcnnils arc required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving. which shall bc refunded upon complclion of the construelion to the satisfaction of tile City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be inslallcd to City Standards, exccpl for single family rcsidcnlial lots. h. Street names shall bc approvcd by tile Cily Pkmncr prior to submilzal for first plan check. __ 5. Strcci improvemorn plans per Cily Slandards for all private sireels shall bc provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the privatc streets, fees shall be paid and construction pcmlils shall be oblaincd fronl tile Cily Enginccr's ofl']cc in addition Io any other permits required. X 6. Street trees, a minimun'~ of 15 - g,filon size or larger shall be installed pcr Cily Seandards in accordance with Ihc City's street Ircc program. X 7. Inlcrscctior~ line of sight designs shall be rcvicv,'cd by the City Engineer for confon'nancc with adopied policy. On collector or larger street. lines of sight shall be plotled for all project intersections. including driveways. L~ca~rcsidcntia~str~ctin~rscc~nsandc~mnicrcia~rindustria~driv~waysmayhav~in~s of sight plotted as required. 8. A Pcrmit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work wifllin the following righi-of-way: __ 9. All public irnprovcnxcnts on die following strccls shall bc opcralionally cumplclc prior to the issuance of building pcnnils. C. I'nhlic Mainlcnnncc Area,; I. A separate set of landscape and irrigation platis per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior m final parcel map approval. The following landscaped parkways, medians. pascos. casements, trails. or other areas shall be annexed into the 3 Z)lq Landscape Maintenance DistricI: 2. Public landscape areas arc required to incorporate substantial areas ( %) of ranflared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. X 3. A signed consent and waiver forn~ to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed wltb the City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Fomlalion costs shall bc borne by the developer. 4. All required public hmdscaping and irrigation systems shall bc colninuously maintained by tbc developer until accepted by the City. __ 5. Parkway landscaping on the following strcct(s)shallconforn~ to tile results of the respective Bcaufi~cation Master Plan: D. Drain:~,oe and Flood Cnntrol I. Tbc project (or portions thereof) is Incaled wltbin a Flood Ilazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approvcd by the City Engineer. 2. It shall bc the dcvclopcr's responsibility to have the current FIR,",1 Zone designation removed front the project area. The devclopcr's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letlet of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA. prior In final parcel map approval. A Lcller of Map f.e.c,,.ision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or inq~rovement acccplancc. v,'bichcvcr occurs firs[ __ 3. A final drainage stud.',' sb;lll be subnlittcd to and approvcd by tile City E;lginccr prior to final parcel map approval. All drainage facilities sitall bc installed as required by tile City Engineer. X 4. Adequate provisions shall be made for acccplancc and disposal of surface drainage from I'arccl I to Parcel 2. __ 5. A perutit from the San Bcmardino Count)' Flood Control District is required for work within it's right-of- way. __ 6. Trees arc prohibited within 5 feet of tire outside diameter of any public slonn drain pipe mcasurcd from __ 7. Public storm drain casements sitall bc graded to convey overflows in tile cvcn~ of blockage in a sump catch basin on a public sireel. Improvement Cnmplcliln~ __ I. If the rcqulrcd public improvements are not conrplctcd prior to approval of the final parcel map. an improvcnlent sccurily accompanied by an agreement cxcculcd by the Dcvch~pcr and the City will be required for: 4 X 2. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for: Each Parcel - sidewalks, street trees, drive al~l~roaches, ~1~1~/ F. Utilities X 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. X 2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dis~'ict, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance from CCWD is required prior to final parcel map approval. Such letter must have been issued by the Water District within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. X 3. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. X 4. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. G. General Requirements and Approvals X~ 1. The tentative map approval is valid for the 36-month period following the approval date. Time extensions may be granted by the Planning Commission, if requested prior to the expiration date. X 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition. X 3. Final grading plans for each parcel shall be as required by the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading permits. 4. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (C C & R's) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to approval of the final parcel map. __ 5. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to f'mal parcel map approval for: 6. Prior to approval of the final parcel map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District , among the newly created parcels. X 7. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first 6 months of operation, prior to final parcel map approval. 5 D* t X 2. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certi ticate shall be placed upon the final parcel map. staling that they will be completed upon development for: Each Parcel - sidewalks, street trees. drive approaches, and street llu, hts F. Utilitics X I. Providc separate utility services to cach parcel including sanilary sewerage system, gas, electric pov,'er, Lclephone and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with tile Utility S Easements shall bu provided as required. Walcr DistricL (CCWD), Rancho Cucalnonga Fire Prolcclioo Dislric~ Eovironmcnlal lienigh Depa,'lmcnL of~he Counly of San Bcrnardino. A lel~cr ofcoznpliancc is required prior to final parcel map approval. Such Ic~Ier must have been issued by the :r Distrlc~ widfio 90 days prior to final map approval in lh~ case of subdivision or prior ~o ~l~e issu:n [he case of all ofl~cr residential projeczs. X 3. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and udder i ~ncics involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subjec~ ~o any requlrenxcu~s iha received from X 4. 11~e developer shall be responsible for ~hc relocalion of utilities as neeessay. G. General Requirements nnd Approvals ~ I. ~e ~cnta~ive map approval is valid for ~l~e 36-mon followiu~ tl~e approval dale. Time extensions may be granted by die Plauning Commission, if ,riot Io ~hc expiration dale. officers, or employees, of such approval, or i~ [hc alternative. ~o relinquish such a~tomey's fees which the City. its :gcnt~ ~ployccs may bc required by a court to pay as a rcsull of such acfion. The City may. sole discretion. parlicipa~c at its own expense in Ihc defense of any such action buc such pa~icipalio nol relieve applican~ of his obligafion under Ibis condition. X 3. Final grading plans for each par as required by ~hc Building and Safc~y Division prior issuance of grading pcmxi~s. ~ 4. A copy of ~he Covenants itions, and Rcstrictlons (C C ~ R's) approvcd by ~l~c City Al~omcy is required prior ~o approval final parcel map. __ 5. An cascmcnl for a joinl driveway shall bc provided prior ~o final pared map approval for: __ 6. Prior to approval parcel map a dcp<tsit shall bc posted wilh Ihe City caveflag the csllmatcd cosl of apponionin, c asscsszncnls under Assessment Distric~ . among Ihc newly crca~cd pare X 7. ~A dablc dcposll shall bc paid to the Cily, covcring the cstimalcd operating cosls for all new for the first 6 mouths ofopcrafion. prior to final parcel map approval. 8. Prior to ~nalization of any development phase. sufficient intprovement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection Io tile satisfaction of tile City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shov,'n on tile approved tentative map. __ 9. Etiwanda/San Soynine Area Regional Mainline. Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final parcel map approval. __ 10. Pen:tits shall be obtained from the following agencies for v,,ork within their righi-of-way. I t. Asigncd conscntand waiver form lojoin and/or fonn tile Law Enforcement Comnlunity Facilities District shall he filed wiih file Cily Engloccr prior lo final parcel map approval. Formallon cosIs shall bc borne by the developer. 12. Prior to recordation of the final parcel map, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, tile eslablishment ofa Mello-Roos Comntunity Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. |lowever. if any school districl has previously cslablished such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in tile alternative, consent Io the annexation of the project stir into the territory of such existing district prior to tile recordat:on of tile final pared map. Further, if the affected school district has not fom'~ed a Mcl Io-Roos Cornnmnity Fact lilies District within twelve months from lhe date ofapproval of the project and prior to tile recordadon of the final parce map for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice thai tile applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agrccntcnt to privately accomntodatc any and all school in:pacts as a result of this project. 3. McHo Roos Connnunhy Facilities District requirements for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Pro(cction District shall apply to this project. 14. Pursuant to provisions of Califomla Resources Code Section 21099(b). this application shall not be operative. vested or final. nor '.','ill building pcm~its be issued or a map recorded. until (I) the Notice of Doteretina:ion (NOD) regarding the associated cnvironrncntal action is filed and posted with Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernard:no; and (2) any and all required handling charges. are paid to Ihc County Clerk of the County of San Bcmardino. The applicant shall provide the Englnccring Department with a slampcd copy of the NOD together wilt: a receipt showing Ilia: all fees have been paid. In the event this application is dctcmtined cxcnlpt froIll such filing fees pursuant to tile provision of the California Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Excmpfion, this condition shall be deemed nul[ and void. Revised 9/g/Og 6 CITY OF RANCt IO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: August 25, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Warren Morelion, Planning Aide SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-35 - ROBERT A FREIS - A request to construct a 7,549 square foot single family home on .74 acres of land within the gated King Ranch Estates (Tract 10277) in the Very-Low Residential District, located at 5073 Earl Court - APN: 1061-791-09. Related File: Tree Removal Permit 99-19. ANALYSIS: A. Applicable Requlations: The construction of the project will result in a cut of more than 10 feet in vertical depth and a cut and fill of more than 2,300 cubic yards. Because the cut and fill exceed 5 feet and 1.500 cubic yards of soil, this project requires Planning Commission review and approval according to the Hillside Development Regulations (Section 17.24.020. B.2&3 of the Development Code). B. Backqround: The site is Lot 23 of Tract 10277. which is a 30-lot subdivision in a private gated community. The tract was approved ;n 1981 and prior to adoption of the Hillside Development Regulations. There are 9 vacant lots including the site remaining within the tract. They are rough graded with house pads. A survey of existing houses within the tract showed that there is a mix of single, and two-story homes with tuck-under garages. Many of the homes also use terraced walls and contour grading to address the hillside conditions and soften the appearances. C. Proposed Project: The applicant proposes to build a single story home with a tuck-under garage. The footprint of the single story house extends beyond the previously rough graded pad area, which resulted in additional grading. Consistent with the existing houses within the tract, the applicant proposes to use terracing walls, contour grading of the slopes, and additional landscaping to soften the appearance of the project and address the hillside conditions. D. Desiqn Review Committee: On August 3.1999, the Committee (Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong) reviewed the project and acknowledged that it is within a tract previously subdivided and graded, prior to the Hillside Development Regulations. The Committee accepted the grading concept with the condition that the applicant incorporate terraced walls and contour grading and provide additional landscaping to screen and soften the size of the project and as shown in Exhibit "G." ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 99-35 - Robert A. Frets August 25, 1999 Page 2 E. Tree Removal Permit 99-19: The eastern portion of the site is a 60-foot wide easement that contains a natural drainage feature, and a block wall that separates it from the buildable portion. In front of this wall is a row of Eucalyptus trees (ten total}. The applicant proposes to remove them and has submitted photos to demonstrate that the trees are infested with the "Lerps" insects and as shown in Exhibit "H." Attached is general information regarding this species of insect. Staff recommends removal of the trees with replacements at a ratio of one to one. F. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, pursuant to Section 15301 of the Slate CEQA Guidelines. CORRESPONDENCE: On August 3, 1999, the City received a letter from King Ranch Estates Homeowners' Association approving plans for the development of the proposed single family home on Lot 23 of Tract 10277(Exhibit "B"). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review No. 99-35 and Tree Removal Permit 99-19, through the adoption of the attached conditions and Resolution of Approval. Brad Buller City Planner BB:WM\Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Information Sheet Exhibit "B" - Homeowners Association Approval Letter Exhibit "C" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site/Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - August 3, 1999 Design Review Committee Action Comments Exhibit "H" - Tree Removal Permit 99-19 and Photos of Eucalyptus Trees Resolution of Approval INFORMATION SHEET DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-35 FILE NO: Development Review 99-35 PROJECT NAME: Single Family Residence APPLICANT: Robed A. Frets LOCATION: 5073 Earl Court FLOOR AREA: 7,549 sq. ft. LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: Residential EXISTING ZONING: Very Low Residential (VL) EXISTING LAND USE: Lot 23 of Tract 10277 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: ZONING LAND USE North: Very Low Residential (VL) Single Family Residence South: Very Low Residential (VL) Single Family Residence East: Very Low Residnetial (VL) Single Family Residence West: Very Low Residential (VL) Vacant Lot SITE DESCRIPTION: The site slopes nodh to south and has previously been rough graded for a single family home. A 6 loot block wall and Eucalyptus windrow separate the buildable podion ol the site with the .21 acre nalural drainage easement which exists on the eastern portion of the site. Access is to the site is from Earl Court. SITE SIZE: The lot size is .74 acres. King Ranch Estates Homeowners Association C/O Sure Kate Property Management 1693 West Ninth Street Upland, CA 91786 Phone: 909-920-4181 Fax: 909-920-4186 August 3. 1999 City ofRancho Cucamonga Planning Dcpamnent 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To whom it may concern: The Architectural Committee of King Ranch Estates Homeowners Associatio~ has reviewed lot layout plans, landscape plans. driveway plans, and block wall designs for Lot #23 at King Ranch Estates. All plans have been approved as drawn; hey are consistent with our Neighborhood. If any further assistance is needed, please call Sure Kate Property Manageme it at 909-920-4181. Sincerely ,~ ) · / the direction of the Architectural Committee. King Ranch Homeowners Association .. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:30 p.m. Nancy Fong/~Varren Morelion August 3, t 999 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-35 - ROBERT A. FREIS - A request to conslruc( a 7,549 square fool single family home on .74 acres of land within lhe gated King Ranch Estates (Tract 10277) in the Very Low Residential District. located at 5073 Earl Courl - APN: 1061-791-09. Relaled File: Tree Removal Permit 99-19. BackOround and Desiqn Parameters: The site is Lot 23 of Tract 10277, which is a 30-1ol subdivision in a private gated communily. The Iract was approved. prior Io Ihe adoption of the current Hillside Development Regulalions. There are 9 vacanl lots including lhe project site remaining wilhln Ihe tract. They are roughed graded wilh house pads. On Ihe east side of Ihe tract is a nalural drainage feelure approximalely 60 feel wide. This drainage lealure reduces the buildable area of lhe silo to .53 acres. and as shown in Exhibil 'A.' A 6-tool block wall and a Eucalyptus windrow separale the buildable portion of Ihe silo and Ihe nalural drainage easemenl. The applicant proposes Io build a single slory home wilh a luck under garage. The conslruction of his proposed house will have a cul oil0 feel and a cul and fill of more than 2330 cubic yards of din. Because the cut and fill exceed 5 feel and 1500 cubic yards. Ibis application requires Design Review Committee review and recommendation and Planning Commission action, according to the Hillside Development Regulalions in Ihe Development Code. The purpose o{ lhe review is Io ensure Ihal Ihe proposed project meets the inlenl of Ihe Hillside Development Regulalions. .Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an oulline for Commitleo discussion. Meier Issues: The following broad design issues will be lhe focus of Commltlee discuss/on regarding this proiecl: 1. Gradlnq: The IDolprint of Ihe single story house wilh a luck under garage extends well beyond lhe previously rough graded pad area. which resulled in excessive culling. 2 Io I slopes. and high retaining walls. The primary Issue Is whether the proposed project meets the inlent of lhe Hillside Developmenl Regulalions. The purpose el the Hillside Develolamenl Slandards is to minimize grading and building mass. A survey of existing houses in King Ranch Esta Ies showed Ihal they are two-slory wilh some houses having luck- under garage. Most of lhe lois used letraced relaining walls. rounded contours and undulalion (a mix of 2 Io 1, 3 Io 1. 4 to 1) of slopes to soften the hillside areas. To address the Hillside Developmenl Standards. Ihe applicanl could reduce Ihe size of the house to wilhin lhe already rough graded pad. which would reduce Ihe amounl Of grading, To lurther reduce grading, the driveway could be moved back Io the original location. which is almosl al the middle of Ihe silo. then loop soulhward to the luck under garage and as shown in Exhibil 'B.' The only signilicanl grading left I0 do is the proposed luck under garage. Secondan( Issues: Once all el/he major issues have been addressed. and tlmo permitllng. lho Commitlee will discuss the Iollo,,ving secondary design issues: 1. Grading. The Iollowlng requirements are a minimum Ihat must be addressed whelher or nol lho lootprint of the proposed house is reduced: a. Provide contour grading and undulation and modulation el slopes with a mix Of 2 Io 3 Io I. 4 Io I and 5 Io I. This would solten tho hard edges left by cul and fill and give /he finished conlouts a natural look. b. Provide dense and marure landscaping for any slopes crealed by the pro~aosed grading. cr'X' t FF" G" E 12, J DRC COMMENTS DR 99-35- ROBERT A. FREIS August3.1999 Page 2 , c. Reduce the helghl ot the retaining walls by lerracing or slepping (hem for the up slopes and down slopes of the site. The maximum retaining height is 3 leel separated by a 3- loot landscaped area. d. Provide 3-loot or lower relainlng/decorative walls for holding back Ihe 2 Io 1 slopes and for framing Ihe driveway. which would ereale a formal entry Iheme. e. The approval of Ihe Iract required Ihe preservation el exisdng frees. The applicant proposes Io removal all Eucalyplus trees along Iho easl wall. Stall believes lhal many of the Irees should be preserved in place. Slatt Recommendation: Slalf recommends lhat with Ihe secondary issues addressed Ihe proposed proice[ meets Ihe intent of Ihe Hillside Development Regulalions. Stall recommends that Ihe existing Irees be preserved as many as possible. Attachments Oesiqn Review Committee Action: Members Presenl: Pare Slewan. Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Nancy Fong/VVarren Morelion The Committee noled Ihal many homes wffh/n (he Irac( were built be/ore Iho adoption el the HIllside Ordinance and thal Ihe subject sl~e is rough graded. The Commiltee recommended approval el the proiecl wilh Ihe/OilOwing :Ond~liOnS IO meel part el Ihe HillSide Regulations: t. Provide conlour grading. that il, undulal~on and modulalion el slopes wilh a mix el 2 to 1,3 Io 1,4to 1.andSlo 1. 2. Provide letraced walls on slopes per Hillside Regulations, 3. Provide landscape elemenls Io reduce and soften the projeCl's size. 4. The committee reviewed color photos el the existing Eucalyplus tree and agreed that they are infesled wilh bugs (possibly Lerps). The Committee recommended removal wilh replacemenl trees at a one-lo-one ralio. Tree Removal Permit :.,--.-;:...,, Development Ordinance No 275. pertaining to the presen,'atlon o; trees on private property. requires Ihal no person remove or relocate any ,,voody plants ~n excess o; fiReon (15) ;eel ~n height and hawng a s~ng;e [funk ctrcumference ot ~;Ieen (15) inches or more and mu{[htrunks hawng a c~rcum/erence el Ihlrty {30} inches or more (measured P,venly-;our (2.:) inches ;tom ground level). w~thoul lirs[ obtaining a Tree Removal Permil from Ihe GIy. Locat~ono;Sublec[S,te 5073 Ear[ Court, ALCa Lor:~.n, Ca. Name. Address. Telcphoneo!Appr,canl Robert A. E'reis, 1258 Chcotrlut St. , UpLand, CA. , 9i784 909 946-5220 :.;ork 909 466-3809 Name. Address. Telephone of Prope~y Owner (,f o:net than appt,canl) ReasonsfcrRemoval(a:~achnecessantsheet(s): RepLace 'wfth tr~2c:; appropriate to the Landscape DesLgn Ptos-Ds.:c.':.1..unodo;R,:mo,zal }lL:',: [)L'ofcs:;/o:l,lL tr,:,2 r;uScpJOnt; ,\sp',:can: s S~gna:'ure Oa:,2 7/14/99 APPR d ' ,~, [] D~:NleD Proxim,ty [o an ex,st,ng slruc[ure or in[erference wilh u[,rity services. ~ct'03 ~ "Cc>~%~:'("Oc.~r\cb'~ ~(,- k Effec: o~ lree ~emov8l on ~ne aesthetics o~ Jhe a~ea and ~he pubhc heaRh. sa~e~y and weffa~e, Can lne lree be prese~ed by pruning or relocaUon? ~ P~ ~ ~ ~1~ j Do the [tees consbIu[o a significan[ na[ural DATE.' ~ ./ EVALUATED BY: , Lerp attack! Lelps. Ih[; Auslrallan name for whal we know as Psyrlids a~c ;lilacking Some E~calyllh~s in SOulhem Cal~lornla, AI Ihis I)oin[ i( appears Ihal Rwcr Red gum (Eucalyptus are vcfy prone Io Iha allack, Blue gum growing among Rivc~ Red gum were nol louthad and IrOnbark growing direoily aCroSs Ih~ sireel also were no( bolhered by Ih~ I)esf. OTI Wednesday. May Ig. 1999. the LA Times ran a lenglhy a~licle on Ihe inleslallon in L. A. Co~mly. They noted lhat Ihe pesl was lirSl toperled in Junu el 1990 in El Menlo bul has since showit up all over the Sot~lhland and al sev- eral localions in the San Francisco Bay Area. The obvious signs o~ time ground are ac- the loll-loll C$yslallized Caps Ionned by nymphs as Ihay [oed by sucking Sugars CaSI Oil as Iha i~lsecI develol)s. These Small Caps give lhe elleel Ol small hail- ilones on Iha ground. They have bean misla~en as latlilizer gran- dearl scale covers. op{]tculunl el Ihe eLicalypl seed and p(obably n hosl el oJhl~r ilem:i, Looking up inlo Ihl~ cm~opy Ihere usedlogoodellecl. (~l,)f ~u~lt;ll$,l P;I I:; VUl. t, In Pests el Land5cal~ Tre~s and Shrub%. Igg,I (Tht~ Unlvfzt- sily o[ Calilortfia Division el Agncullu~e .lad Natural R~. '~:~. sources Publicalien 3350). advice lot man;Ig~ng pSylhdS IrOI, lile silualions Ilushlng the area wilh biasis ol walor will agilalo and discourage Ihe pests and help by washing away sticky HcaD, kff~io~ w~m ~ dL~covez~d ~ S'~ord Uaive.~ic/~ ~ C~ ~ by ~ps~at of A~cul~- ~e ~don ~ El Mon~ ~ ~ milc dr two m ~= c~ ~d ~ ~d it 1~ s~ b~ dis~ Ideati~ti~a: ~c yo~g ~g build a m~l le~ by cx~g a ge!at~o~ h~' ~tn ~ek pokedot thai runes end. ~n I.rger I~ae ~ fo~d ~dcm~ath ~c le~ ~d remind one of~ ~ot~ ~le ~ ~e ~ni~l ~ I=~ ~at will reach a sl of ~bout 3 ~ ~ dlgeter ~d 2 mm in hci~k ~e l~w~e ffig. 4) ~ yellow, or ycllo~ ~d bro~ m ~lor. ~e adul~ ~lgs. ~.3) long. slender insccu. pale ~n ~fl~ ~e~ of orange ~] yellow, ~d 3 mm long. ~ey differ flora other ~lifomla p~llldt h ~at ~cy ha~i long geaal ~neg on ~e face. ' Comments:. U~on rcmov~g ~e le~ ~om ~hc I~f cufface d~e e~ ~11-~o~ 1,~, bcginc com~ct~g a new le~. A ma~ of new material which will b:uu,.: ~ uew le:p is foxed over d~c h~:. R moves in a ckculu dkcction ~ order to ~dd to ~ver. Some :x~:d l~ac wi~cr~ =d dim after their Ic~ w~ remove. G~soa obsc~cd ~at ~dulu fit on ~e l~ves ~d quickly ~ex'~cir umi up ~d do~. ~ ~vior m~y fire s~u being attacked by several pttd~tors, ~clcdLna ~ ~o FIg. 2. Redgum le~ psyl[id (adults) in=~uccd lady~edG ~ tf~monfa mj~id:'~ Cht'lOC~rlU bl~'la.~. p=dcululy ~,~ farmoz. which occu~ ~ l~g: ~' numbers bo~h m El Mon~ ~d ~d~w~. ~ 'l C~eaU'/. G~oa i~ nQt ae of ~y r~:~ch b:m$ conducted on iF. ~ s~atlon may cb~nSe should ~e d~ag: ~ic~cd by d~is psyllid ~me . wid~prc=d ~nd noti:b[c. · ~ie$ h~ ~e pvtcnd~ to bl y~ ro~d h ~ou~em ~lifomia. F~. 3. Redgum psyBid (lama) ' Ac~owledgemenb: ~ ~c duc to ~y Gill, CDFA for m~g ~e ~il~ identiH~tioa ~d Ig ~o~ct[on ~d literature on d~ Reference: GIL ~ J. I~l. g~'~ I~ F~llld [N~ f~e ~]. h: ~,romi~ gl~t P~ ~tl Ot~ ~ 17(I-~): 7-8. Marc, K.~(. 1~64. O~'~ oa Iomc A~;~ fu~ I~ l~. Four nr.~ ~[~ ~ Gtif~p~ ~lomop~:Pr/llla~) ~m Q,c:~l~d. P~. Li~ S~- NSW 89(t): 161-166. P~tI[~) wl~ d~;pt{~ o~ty~ ~i~. A'~i~ ~otOIL~l L50)~241-34~ M~. K,M. 1970~. Ob~o~ oa ~m~ Am~ (e~t I~u. Jr. ~.c Gt~4~pa sp~, 01omo~: ~ eo~a[duIr~& g~. I. Enlo~L S~. ~il ~I,g.W.) 7: 3-7. Propgod by Ro~er W. G~=on. gntomologi3~ ~s ~gclc= Coun~ AVlcuh~l O:~c:. 34G0 ~ blsdcm Ave.. EI ~nte, CA 91732 ~ 626-5754469 10/98 New Agricultfiral Pest far Snu eru California Redgu m Lerp psyllid, Glycaspis brintblecontbd (3Figs. 1-3) Introduction: On 17 June 1998, Los Angeles.County Agrlcultcral Inspector Cindy Werncr gathcrcd some leaves of R'.d Gum Eucalyptus from thr~c he·vii)' infcstcd uccs bordering the Interstate I0 Freeway across the succt from tho Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioncr's Oflicc in El Moato. The lr.wr.'~ were covered with ho'ncydc;v and curious..'round, whiP: mounds (Fig. I). Sta/'f Entomologist P,.osser Garrison determined that the cones were Icrps of a completely nc'.~ p}yllld unllk. ~:,' k. no,.,.'n from CLlifomi~ or th,~ Uniled SLates. Eyamination through v~riou~ literature sourots revealed that this species was one of m~y lcrp-(ormiag psylllds n.advc to Auswall~. Garrison coa~clcd Biosystcmatic Enlomalo~ist Ray Gill of thc CMifomi:z 12h:pa. rtmcac of Food and Agri,sulmro who later collected malcrlal at the sit· on 21 lun,~ .nd repnned hi~ find·hE· by' telcphonc to Garrison later that week. Gill iclentificd the psyllld ~s GI, vcaspls brim~l,'co,nbd, a species ctescribccl 1964 from Bri5b:mc, Aust:alia. SpccLmc~.s wc;e scat to Daniel B~clc.hatdt, p.--7llid ~pcci;-li¢t in gwi~erhnd, (or canto'toni·on Th;,c .~pex:ie% which i.~ a new North American record. is ~ rcFrcsct~Lstive Of ~ Izu'~c group o[ lcrl~- forming psyLltds spot·flu tu cuu.dy~,:',;s uccs- IEconnm~c hopnil:inca: R~dr. um Lcrp Psyllid CRLP) forms a 'lorD." Thi; i'; a mostly sccr_.:tlo~y. s~ucmrc o1' crT:ta:lLzc~l bon.-"ydcv~ produced by tho nympl't~ ~.~ a. prot:ctlvc covcr On. at -.Ic:.'.y r.,:c.-n. blec armored Ecxl,e The psyllid: produ:c larg-. smokuv.: cC houc),de~v, which st.sins the grouod ullcl:nlc-~th the LIce5. in scvc'rc Itff,:_~t.1;Ioas, t~ousa.ncls o1' Icrp:i co,tot Lh: ground and ur.d-'rs:or7 giving the appcan'u~cc of hsi{ droppings. The Icrps and associated honeydew easily stick to shocs whcn walking through the arc·. I4,-.~vy ;nre_~tinn~ cause scvcrc leaf cfrcp. Thus far. this species has been t. akcn only on RM Gum Eu~lypms (Euc:l)pt~ c. amaldulensis), b~ has :small Icrp:~ orl .t lea.st oao other .~p~ci.:, ,..r,~calJ~tur rsd~. RLP will proh:tbl;/ bc found on other ·posies ofeucalyprus. : In AusLr'alia P, LP is known to fecd aa a localized population of the redgum e'.l. L _-.,ca,y~:u.: .uc·l}'pt'a~: 0Moore 1970b ). Acc. c, rdin8 Ii, Mc. nrc (19'TDa). R[.P i~ :,l.'.q known r..,nata;t.n:~; ~;: ..~.lh to feccl on Eucalyptus dialbat·. E. ter,:ncorrlis. E. blak.~lyt. E. brldg~iana, and Isr~,~ .~a.U;,,rn ~s~ E. nitfro. Tlsc p~yllid i:~ hu~lic4r. cd io sclio~ outbr-.41u in nativ· :sltu. atio~s~ in ~sy.~ Cst.~ ~z~) Australi~s and ha.~ Lhc potential to bc ,~ si[,ni~c.2..at orn.~rncn~.l pc.s1 of eucalyptus in California. Db. trlbutlon: RLP we.:· originally do~cribad in 196'1 fron~ Bricbane. Au.-ln!.h Cl~oor', 1964) but it ha~ bccn found in central Queen·lind. and over most of New South Walc:s (Mu. orc 1970b). Bc~ich:s the initial finclings In El Monte, K.L.P was c!lsco~crcd In nor',hcn~ CMifuluia. Sa~nFlcs wclc flt~t 24 July in Al~nn. cd:s County nc.'L,' Fromant at the Ardenwood Prcscr.'c, · forTnor fa.'~n and ranch now maintJ. incd as a psrk by the F.,z:t Bay p,.cgianal Pat~ District by 'Eric grc~maa, a E.T:~duatc student st the Uaive."slty of C:lifomla. Davis and P. onnie Eaton, with the Alarnca County Dcp~'trnent of Agrlculturc. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 99-35 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 99-19, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 7,549 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME ON .74 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE GATED KING RANCH ESTATES (TRACT 10277). LOCATED AT 5073 EARL COURT IN THE VERY-LOW DISTRICT (0-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061-791-09. A. Recitals. 1. Robert A. Freis has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 99-35, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of August 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correcl. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on August 25, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 5073 Earl Court with a street frontage of 166 feet and lot depth of 213 feet, and is presently improved with a 6-foot block wall separating the buildable portion of Ihe lot with the natural drainage easement portion; and b. The properties to the north, south, and east are developed with single family residences, the property to the west is a vacant lot; and c. The site contains ten diseased eucalyptus trees which will be removed and replaced on a one-to-one basis; and d. The grading concept is consistent with the established Tract 10277. With the conditions of approval, the project will meet the intent of the Hillside Development Regulations. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission duric, g the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 alcove, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-35 - Robert A. Frets August 25, 1999 Page 2 b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The City Planner hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1) Approval is for the development of a 7,549 square foot single family home within the gated King Ranch Estates. 2) Tree Removal Permit 99-19 is approved subject to replacement on a one-for-one basis. Tree size and the species shall be subject Io City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of grading permits. The trees shall be installed prior to release of occupancy. The permit shall be valid for a period of 90 days which shall start from the issuance of building permits. 3) Approval of Tree Removal Permit 99-19 will be null and void if Development Review 99-35 expires. 4)Provide contour grading wilh a mix of 2 to1, 3 to 1, 4 to1, and 5 to 1 slopes. 5) Walls, retaining and/or garden types, shall be of decorative material with a decoralive cap. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 99-35 - Robert A. Freis August 25, 1999 Page 3 A'R'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of August 1999, by Ihe following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: Development Review 99-35 SUBJECT: Hillside Single Family APPLICANT: Robert A. Fries LOCATION: 5073 Earl Court ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements ~ 1, The applicanl shall agree to defend at h~s sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents. officers. or employees, because of the issuance of such approval. or in the alternative. to relinquish such approval The app[icar',t shall reimburse the City. its agents, officers. or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the C~ty. its agenls. officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such aclion. The City may. at its sole discretion, participale at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such padicipation shall not rerieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit. Variance. or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include sffe plans, architectural elevations. exterior materials and colors. landscaping, sign program. and grading on file in the Planning Division. the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations, 2.Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon. all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction el' the City Planner, 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and __ __ / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy. plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Buirding and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated i'or consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of ~his request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 8. For residential developmenL return walls and corner side walls sha~l be decorative masonry. D. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and o~her roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the buirding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. E. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigafon pran. including slope planting and model home landscaping in lhe case of residenfal development. shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architecl and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A~privates~pes~f5~.ee~rm~reinvert~ca~heightand~f5:1~rgrea~ers~pe.but~essthan2:1 / slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet. but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater __ I__1__ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15ogallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area. and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ~t. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously __1 / maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by/he developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units. an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in sahsfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development __/__ Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the __/ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. F, Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location __/__ __ of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate fighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. General Requirements 1. Submit four complete sets of plans including the following: ~/~ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, delached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors. panel schedules, and single hne diagrams: f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans. including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping. and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., 'IF #, CUP #, DR #, etc.} clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations. and a soils report. Architect's/Engineers stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan Check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensafion coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i. e.. CUP 98-01 ). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code. Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code. National Electric Code, Title 24 Access~bd~ty requirements, and all other apphcable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) Or major addition to __/ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beauti~cation Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all __/ supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardtrio County Department of Environmental Health and submitted Io Ihe Building Official prior to lhe issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 4, Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m, Monday __/__ __ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. I. New Structures 1. Roofing material shall be inslalled per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / 2. Roofing materials shall be Class "A." / J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City I__1__ Grading Standards, and accepled grading prachces. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A Soils report shall be prepared by a quahfied engineer licensed by the State of California to / / perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / time of application for grading plan check, 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior Io issuance of building permits. / 5. In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the / standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17.24,070. 6. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for ____1 existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared. stamped. and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K, General FIre Protection Conditions 1. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval, Required hydrants, / if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. CITY OF RANCI I0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 25, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rebecca Van Buren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EMPIRE LAKES DESIGN GUIDELINES - GENERAL DYNAMICS PROPERTIES - Review of supplemental design guidelines for the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, a 380 acre Mixed Use project surrounding the Empire Lakes Golf Course, and bounded by Milliken Avenue, Fourth Street, Utica Avenue, and the Metrolink railroad. Related files: Development Review 99-39 and Tentative Parcel Maps 15350 and 15346. BACKGROUND: The Empire Lakes Subarea Specific Plan was approved by City Council through adoplion of Ordinance No. 525, which requires preparation of supplemental design guidelines. The guidelines must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. The intent of the guidelines is to "create a distinguishing character for the Empire Lakes project" through such unifying design concepts as entry statements, signage, and street furniture. ANALYSIS: The attached supplemental design guidelines identify design concepts for entry statements, street furniture, and project fencing. The proposed designs and materials are consistent with the amentries provided for the Empire Lakes Golf Course and Country Club facility. The applicant does not intend to construct project identification monument signs; hence, no sign designs are proposed. The applicant believes that the land use flexibility of Subarea 18 Specific Plan, which allows a range of uses from industrial to commercial. desea, es careful consideration of sign design in conjunction with each development project. Staff agrees that the sign needs of a shopping center are quite distinct from those of an industrial warehouse. Rather, the guidelines illustrate where such signage may be constructed by each parcel owner, but do not identify specific design elevations. Staff worked closely with the applicant in the preparation of Ihese guidelines and believes they will ensure a unifying character through landscape and hard scape design. It should be noted that the Subarea 18 Specific Plan has extensive design guidelines and the attached guidelines are truly a supplemental document, which must be considered in light of the whole Further, the "master plan" process will refine the individual design solutions for each planning area. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EMPIRE LAKES August 25. 1999 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Supplemental Guidelines as submitted by Minute action. Respectfully submitted d Bullet City Planner BB:RVB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Supplemental Design Guidelines for Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 18 Folr If ASP Sub-Area n8 Prepared For EMPIRE LAKES City of Rancho Cucamonga Prepared By July t999 ExrH~B~T "P," TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN GUIDELINES .................................................................... 1 A. MAJOR PROJECT GATEWAY TREAMENTS ...................................................... 2 B. MAJOR / MINOR PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENTS ............................................. 2 C. PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENTS .........................................................................3 D. BENCHES ............................................................................................................3 E. BOLLARDS ..........................................................................................................4 F. TRASH RECEPTACLES ......................................................................................4 G. PARKING LOT LIGHTS .......................................................................................4 H. PROJECT FENCING ...........................................................................................5 Suppicmcntal Dcsign Guidclincs i e~.,~.: L I. SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN GUIDELINES The intent of this document is to supplement the "Design Guidelines" portion of the Specific Plan for Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 as required in Ordinance No. 525, (Page 3, sub-paragraph 4), which is as follows: "The applicant shall prepare supplemental design guidelines to create a distinguishing character for the 380 acre project. The guidelines shall include unifying design concepts for entOl statements, signage and street fumiture (e.g., lighting standards, bollards, benches, etc.) The guidelines shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to application for development of any planning area, except the goff course." The Specific Plan clearly identifies Empire Lakes Golf Course as the cornerstone and unifying feature of the project area. In developing thematic elements pursuant to the requirements of the Specific Plan, it is important to recognize that a variety of developments already exist within the Specific Plan area. This development includes the Empire Lakes Clubhouse. parking area and maintenance building. the General Dynamics Properties. Inc. (GD) Buildings 601 and 602 with associated parking area, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station. Recognizing the existing development, the intent of this document is to create an overall distinguishing theme for the project area, while not dictating an exact design that must be followed. The individual property owner/developer will have the flexibility to make a unique statement while adhering to basic design parameters. Also suggested in this supplement are treatment statements for major project gateways and major/minor parcel entries. conceptual wall and fence designs along the golf course and parcel boundaries. benches to be used along public rights-of way, as well as bollards and trash receptacles. The "Master Plan" process, as described in the Specific Plan. will be used to further define the individual development solutions to the proposed design guidelines. Master Plans will be submitted for each planning area (with the exception of Planning Area II, IV and GD Buildings 601 and 602) at the first development/design review. The Master Plan process for each planning area is to include conceptual design guidelines to indicate architectural forms. landscape concepts, plazas, pedestrian circulation and areas for common use. Master Plans will be subject to review by the Planning Commission. Development of individual parcels will include specific design elements, which will be subsequently administratively reviewed. The following drawings and illustrations represent the proposed design parameters, but are not meant to limit creativity and developer discretion. Supplcmcn~;~l Dcsi~,n Guidelines I EM~',Ia., -- SIDEW^LK TURF A. MAJOR PROJECT GATEWAY o ,x~ =r~s TREAMENTS  The landscape development shall · include the design features outlined in --BOULDER5 the specific plan such as flowering -TUR~' shrubs, groundcovers and trees, with · ol, rloN,\i. ~,,\~c~l.an emphasis on drought tolerant IDENTIFIC,\TION~,IGN varieties. The installation of signage. feature lighting or other constructed .. ~,\ items shall be at the discretion of the parcel owner. Any such features shall be reviewed by the City as a part of the precise plan approval process. The landscape work illustrated shall be installed as a part of the individual parcel development. PARKING LOT Refer to the inventory of approved plant materials within the Specific Plan for the specific plant species to be used for this element of work. B. MAJOR / MINOR PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENTS The major/minor parcel entry ',x~;<>l,Y 'rRICIES treatments shall be simple in theme and execution so as not to distract from the major project gateway treatments. The design palette ~'~ I'AI2, KING LOT includes flowering shrubs, screen hedges and tuff accents such as Ligustrum texanurn. Buxus -- .%IIRUII5 & G.C. ARI,~A japonicum, Pittosporum robira. Agapanthus africanus, and Rahpiolepis indica. 24-inch box Koelreuteria paniculatas shall serve as an accent feature of this treatment. If desired by the parcel owner, identification signage will be permitted within this area. Feature ~ 'smliw^l.K lighting may be provided to accent the specimen trees if desired. These entry treatments shall be located entirely within the private property and thus installed and maintained by the individual property owner. "~'. Supplcmcn<a[ Design Guidelines - C. PARCEL ENTRY TREATMENTS Each individual parcel entry shall include a combination of landscape accent treatments. These treat-ments shall occur within the private property areas and shall be the responsibility of . SID~;'.V,~I.K PARKIN' LOT the property owner. The treatments ~ I"AI{CI~I, IDI~NTIFI shall include decorative interlocking pavers with concrete bands and ~ :/ ,~cc~r .,XNTINC~ accents. If desired by the parcel ' owner. parcel identification signage will be permitted within this area. The accent treatments may include. but are not limited to flowering ground- covers, shrubs & trees as well as feature lighting. ~ nmvt~w,v,' D. BENCHES The benches for the public plazas and community spaces shall be a concrete base with a wood back as manufactured by Quick Crete Products, Norco California Model Number Q1-PAS-84b - Pasadena. E. BOLLARDS The bollards for the public plazas and community spaces shall be concrete as manufactured by Quick Crete Products, Norco California Model Number QR-3B. F. TRASH RECEPTACLES The trash receptacles for the public plazas and community spaces shall be concrete as manufactured by Quick Crete Products, Norco California Model Number QR-BJ1642A Baja Series. G. PARKING LOT LIGHTS The parking lot pole lights shall be commercial grade light fixtures suitable to provide the minimum ambient light as required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The style of the fixture shall be selected to complement the existing fixtures of adjacent developments and meet the development standards for lighting as stated in the existing Specific Plan. A variety of lighting standards already exist throughout the Specific Plan area and subsequent development will need to be flexible to compliment the proposed architecture style of the project and provide both a functional and security solution based on the planned land use. Supplcmcntal Design Guldclincs 4 ~'r,/,,I.,~: H. PROJECT FENCING The property boundaries abutting the golf course shall be fenced continuously primarily of wrought iron or Stucco plastered masonry, as appropriate. At the parcel boundaries cultured stone clad pilasters with pre cast concrete caps shall be installed. 'I tIIIIIIIIIIIIIII All other fencing or screening will be accommodated from the fencin9 styles presented below. To enhance diversity, maintain consistency and incorporate the styles presented below. a combination of a masonry garden wall with a 3 foot wrought iron fence wilt be permitted. Where appropriate, alternative fencing concepts which allow protected viewing of the golf course will also be permitted. Some examples of this type of fencing could include Plexiglas fencin9 around an outdoor plaza and/or recreational area.