No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996/03/13 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY MARCH 13, 1996 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Chairman Barker Commissioner Melcher __ Vice Chairman McNiel __ Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Lumpp IIL Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes January 24, 1996 February14,1996 February 14, 1996, Adjoumed Meeting February 24, 1996, Adjourned Meeting V. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 96-01 - JAVA N' SCOOPS - A request to provide live acoustical music performances, poetry readings, and chess tournaments in conjunction with a coffee and ice cream shop, located at 9788 ,~ 19th Street - APN: 1077-101-06. B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-34 - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES - A request to construct a 40-foot high monopole and related ground equipment within a 360 square foot leased space approximately 625 feet north of 19th Street and 620 feet west of Sapphire Street on a 3.69 acre parcel partially developed with Cucamonga County Water District facilities in the Flood Control Open Space District - APN: 201-201-40. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-02 - JERRY R. MCGUIRK - A request to establish a bar with on-site consumption of beer and wine, with incidental food service, and with 4 pool tables and 2 dart game devices in a leased space of 3,168 square feet in an existing commercial center in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 10431 Lemon Avenue, Unit N, - APN: 201-262-46 and 47. VI. New Business D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-33 - HILL PINCKERT ARCHITECTS - A request to construct two industrial buildings totaling 471,625 square feet on 23.08 acres of land in the General Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located south of Arrow Route and east of White Oak Avenue - APN: 209-471-08. Related File: Modification to Development Review 91-08. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration of environn~ental impacts. E. MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 91-08 - CAPELLINO & ASSOCIATES - A request to modify the approved Master Plan to allow the construction of two industrial buildings totaling 471,625 square feet on 23.08 acres of land in the General Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located south of Arrow Route and east of White Oak Avenue - APN: 209-471-08. Related File: Development Review 95-33. VII. Public Comments This is the time andplace for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VIII. Commission Business IX. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shah be heard only with the consent of the Commission. ], Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. hereby certi~ that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 7, 1996, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. / VICINITY MAP ........ · . =========================================================================== .... i/ I ................. i: ':':':':-:-:-:,:.:.:,:,: =================================================== , ~ ) ~ Z v~, p~ ~ ' __ v~ 'A' CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: March 13, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 96-01 - JAVA N' SCOOPS - A request to provide live acoustical music performances, poetry readings, and chess tournaments in conjunction with a coffee and ice cream shop, located at 9788 19th Street - APN: 1077-101-06. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundino Land Use and Zoninq: North - Future Route 30 Freeway Corridor; Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single Family Residences; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East Apartment Complex; Medium:High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) West Single Family Residences; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) B. Site Characteristics: The site is developed with a neighborhood commercial shopping center and all related public improvements. ANALYSIS: Java N' Scoops is an existing business that serves coffee, ice cream, and food items. The application is proposing to have live acoustical performances on Friday and Saturday evenings from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on Sunday afternoons from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m. Musicians (guitar or cello; jazz) will use the proposed stage area as shown on the attached floor plan (see Exhibit "B"). The stage area is approximately 25 square feet. No alcoholic beverages are currently served or will be served in conjunction with this request. Mr. Umer Farood is the manager of Java N' Scoops and is responsible for the management of the entertainment. In accordance with Section 5.12.040 of the Entertainment Ordinance, the applicant has indicated that neither the applicant nor any persons responsible for the management or supervision of Java N' Scoops has, within the pervious ten years, been convicted of a crime nor has the applicant had any permit or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked at this establishment. Review of the Entertainment Permit must take into consideration Iocational impacts and possible mitigation measures. Java N' Scoops is located within the Stater Brothers shopping center at the northeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue (See Exhibit "A"). This center contains a wide variety of uses, including a grocery store, restaurants, a liquor store and other general retail uses. Surrounding businesses include a hair salon, a pizza restaurant and a liquor store. Immediately to the east, there is an apartment complex. These uses could be negatively impacted ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EP 96-01 - JAVA N' SCOOPS March 13, 1996 Page 2 by the proposed entertainment use of the facility. There is an existing entertainment use at Peppers Restaurant, which is located at the opposite (westerly) side of the shopping center; therefore, no conflict between the two uses is anticipated. Negative impacts could include noise, parking, and disturbances. A condition has been included within the Resolution of Approval that should the operation of this Entertainment Permit cause adverse impacts upon adjacent businesses or operations it shall be brought back before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit, in accordance with Section 5.12.100 of the Entertainment Ordinance. In addition, staff has recommended in the Resolution of Approval that the rear door remain closed during the times specified for entertainment to potentially mitigate any concerns associated with noise as it relates to the apartment complex to the east. The applicant is proposing acoustic music which would not be amplified, therefore noise impact would be negligible. The applicant's business is very small; hence, could not attract any sizable amount of patrons and would not create a parking problem. FIRE SAFETY/BUILDING CODE: The Building & Safety Division and Fire Safety Division have determined that the proposed use would constitute a change to an Assembly occupancy based upon a potential maximum occupancy of over 50 persons. This will necessitate improvements to the lease space to meet building and fire codes. SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: A copy of the activity description and conceptual floor plan were forwarded to the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Department. No concerns or comments were forwarded to staff relative to using the site for entertainment purposes. FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must make the following findings in order to approve Entertainment Permit 96-01: A. The conduct of the establishment of the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. B. The premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly mariner. C. The applicant or any other person associated with him as principal or partner, or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind, or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude, nor has had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of the entertainment revoked within the preceding five years. D. The granting of the application would not create a public nuisance. E. The normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EP 96-01 - JAVA N' SCOOPS March 13, 1996 Page 3 F. The applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. To the best of staffs knowledge, there is no information to indicate anything contrary to these findings. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advedised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and public notices were sent to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Entertainment Permit 96-01 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. City Planner BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Application for Entertainment Permit Resolution of Approval with Conditions LLLLLLU STATER BRO. . .. , I ~ MARKET : ...... IIIIII U;I;I,,U'FF[TFI ..i 19th STREET J T = TABLE & CHAIRS C = COUCH M BAND STAGE/~ 'q ~ W C ~ CI )UNTER <, L ~ J.' Entry ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPLICATION Applicants for entertainment permits shall complete the following questionaire: PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE A. The name and permanent address of, applicant:. P,c. __g-d0_x_/A~tat ~,~ dc~_'x___g&__cd!_-~,s_ ................. Name _kLm___e-g______gS:g___0_~_g~ ....................................... Permanent Address B. The name, proposed and current, if any, and business address of the applicant: / _~_____:3:__~_e,__~____5_-_~9___u:?_s_ ................. Name (Current and Proposed) -c33__gg___J_q___<2t ..... C. A detailed description of the proposed entertainment, including type of entertainment, and number of persons engaged in the entertainment (may attach seperate sheets if necessary): ~-~~____4~.q___g___o~L ..... D. The date or day-of-week, hours and location of entertainment (attach floorplan), and the admission fee, if any, to be charged: ~ -' ..... '~ · ----,- __' ..... L"_,_='_____-_ ..... .~ ........ tg te.'rF "d' u, J E. The name(s) of the person(s) responsible for the management or supervision of applicant's business and of any entertainment: _'\~_~_~-~____~_c~ ........ ~?___~__ .................. ~__ F. A statement of the nature and character of applicant's business, if any, to be carried on in conjunction with such entertainment, including w-hether or not alcohol will be served as part of such business: _~.___c._,~._t~___L_~_____L~ ....~_._ ............. .... G. Whether or not the applicant or any person responsible for the management or supervision of applicant's business have been, within the previous ten years, convicted of a crime, the nature of such offense, and the sentence received therefor including conditions of parole or probation, if any: .... Ixi~,~,O:,_ .................. H. Whether or not applicant has ever had any permit or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or provision of entertainment revoked, including the date thereof and name of the revoking agency: .... Any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application shall be'grounds for denial of the application for an entertainment perm it. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 96-01, A REQUEST TO PROVIDE LIVE ACOUSTICAL MUSIC PERFORMANCES, POETRY READINGS AND CHESS TOURNAMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COFFEE AND ICE CREAM SHOP, LOCATED AT 9788 19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-101-06. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. On January 8, 1996, Mr. Umer Farood filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No. 96-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request. is referred to as "the application." 3. On the 13th day of March 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducled a duly noticed public headng on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 13, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, t~gether with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 9788 19th Street on a lot presently improved with a neighborhood shopping center; and b. The property to the nodh is the future Route 30 freeway corridor. the property to the south and west consists of single family residences, and the property to the east is an existing apartment complex; and c. Java N' Scoops is an existing facility that serves coffee, ice cream and other related food items. The proposal is to provide live acoustic musical entertainment on Friday and Saturday evenings from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on Sundays from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m. The musicians will perform on the stage area located at the rear of the facility, there will be no admission charge, and no dancing is proposed at this time. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 96-01 - JAVA N' SCOOPS March 13, 1996 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; and b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner; and c. That the applicant has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and e. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center and adjacent apartment complex; and f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planninq Division 1 ) This approval is only for acoustic, guitar or stringed instrument. (non- amplified) music performed by a live band of up to two persons. Any change of intensity of entertainment shall require a modification to this permit, 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 96-01 - JAVA N' SCOOPS March 13, 1996 Page 3 4) When entertainment is being conducted, doors shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. 5) Exterior noise levels shall not exceed 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 60 dB dudng the hours from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. 6) Access to the lounge/entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the pdmary use and not from a separate extedor entrance. The rear exit shall be for "Fire Exit Only." 7) Hours of operation of the entedainment use shall be on Friday and Saturday evenings from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. and on Sundays from 12 noon to 6 p.m. 8) Entertainment shall be conducted inside the building. 9) This permit shall be renewed annually by the applicant per Municipal Code Section 5.12.115. Fire Distric'JBuildinq & Safety Division 1 ) An application for change of occupancy shall be made to the Building & Safety Division. A complete set of plans shall be submitted in accordance with 1991 Uniform Building Code and CAC Title 24 (State Building Code). Code requirements shall be completed and inspected by the Building & Safety Division prior to commencement of use. 2) Occupancy shall not exceed the posted occupant load or the assigned occupant load. 3) Any temporary power requirements shall be in accordance with the 1994 Uniform Fire Code. Any new electrical installations shall require electrical permits from the Building and Safety Division. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 96-01 - JAVA N' SCOOPS March 13, 1996 Page 4 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA ' STAFF liEPORT DATE: March 13, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-34 PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES - A request to construct a 40-foot high monopole and related ground equipment within a 360 square foot leased space approximately 625 feet north of 19th Street and 620 feet west of Sapphire Street on a 3.69 acre parcel partially developed with Cucamonga County Water District facilities in the Flood Control Open Space District - APN: 201-201-40. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Site Characteristics: The 3.69 acre site is an uneven and mostly unimproved, scoured flood plain sloping to the south. The proposed monopole will be located on a 360 square foot lease site near the northwest corner of a long parcel bounded by the Route 30 Freeway Corridor on the north, 19th Street on the south, single family residences on the east, and Cucamonga Creek channel and access road on the west. The lease site will be situated south of the fenced well site adjacent to the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel. Access to the site will be by an existing Cucamonga County Water District compacted driveway, (see Exhibit "C"). On the west, parallel to the channel, is a Southern California Edison easement occupied by 66 KV transmission lines on 40-foot high wooden poles, (see Exhibit "D"). The parcel is owned by Cucamonga County Water Distdct and used as an existing well site. A portion of the parcel is planned for a future reservoir. The parcel is surrounded by chain link fence. Existing landscaping includes shrubs and trees outside the fence along the 19th Street frontage and Oleanders inside the fence along the north and east properly boundaries, (see Exhibit "E"). The nearest residence is approximately 240 feet to the east of the proposed monopole. B. Facility Descriotion: The 40-foot high monopole will support six dishes each 4 feet 8 inches in diameter. The monopole will be served by unmanned equipment boxes up to 5 feet 6 inches high placed on a 48 square foot pedestal. The 20 by 18-foot lease site will be surrounded by a chain link fence, (see Exhibit "C"). A combination of trees, shrubs, and vines are proposed for screening and visual interest. (see Exhibit "G"). ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 95-34- PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES March 13, 1996 Page 2 C. Applicable Requlations: Radio communications are regulated by the federal government. Communications facilities may be permitted or conditionally permitted by the local jurisdictions. The subject cellular telecommunication facility falls under the definition of Utility Substation in the Development Code, which is a conditionally permitted use in the Flood Control Open Space District subject to landscaping and screening. ANALYSIS: Consistent with the intent of the Development Code, ground equipment must be screened and the monopole integrated into the visual setting. Irrigated landscaping is proposed for screening and visual integration. To screen the chain link fence and equipment boxes, landscaping is proposed around the lease site including, but not limited to, vines and shrubs. To soften the silhouette of the monopole, Eucalyptus trees are proposed adjacent on the north, south, and east sides of the lease site. The monopole and the equipment will be finished with a natural concrete aggregate finish to blend in with the wash setting. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The subject application is exempt per Section 15061 of the California Environmental Quality Act. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts.. The proposed use, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable regulations of the Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 95-34 through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions. BB:MB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Information Sheet Exhibit "B" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Computer Enhanced Photo of Site Exhibit "E" - Photos of Site Exhibit "F" - Elevation Exhibit "G" - Concept Landscape Plan Exhibit "H" - Project Description Resolution of Approval with Conditions INFORMATION SHEET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE NO: CUP 95-34 PROJECT NAME: CELLULAR MONOPOLE APPLICANT: PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER CUCAMONGA CHANNEL AND ROUTE 30 FREEWAY ROUTE FLOOR AREA: 360 SQUARE FOOT LEASED SPACE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORRIDOR EXISTING ZONING: FLOOD CONTROL EXISTING LAND USE: CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WELL SITE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORRIDOR ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: ZONING LAND USE North: Low Residential (L) 2-4 Du's/Acre UndevelopedNacant: Route 30 Corridor South: Residential (City of Upland) Developed: Single Family East: Low Residential (L) 2-4 Du's/Acre Developed: Single Family and water facility West: Flood Control Developed: Cucamonga Channel and access road SITE DESCRIPTION: SITE SIZE: 3,38 acres PARKING CALCULATIONS: Facility not staffed f~ i f J I IIIIIIIIIL4:q'i'T'~  VACA,"IT STATE HIGHWAY 50 (FUiUR[) GARO[;I COURT -J ;',;,~-',l i ~ '~Z \"-"' .....,...~- $,...,r,, c,~uD '~ ......"""' ~\ '~. "~ ~"L ..'; .........%-.,,-,, ,,~ ~,~ ~ \ I " Plate 2 - Looking North Towards Site From 19th Street PACIFIC II:,IIBELLe Site ShownWithout Proposed Landscaping Screening Mobile Services CM-178-11 City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ' ~//~ ~ ~ 'l 'v',-r',! i.c,c, Kll~'~ t4c,~Tti ToW A£I¥ F,.E,~IX~,.VT/,:I. .!; 5 VIEW: LOOI~INe SOUTN TOWA/2b~ P, ESmEAITIAI, AREA II'-O' # ANTENNAS (TYP) 6 ANTENNA SUPPORT LNA UNITS (TYP) 6 STEEL (2) 9TS UNITS X 63'H X 29' EACH EXISTING 7' H|GH CHAIN LiNK FENCE NEV BOLLARD - TYP. PLANTING LEGEND 29SS F~sdhi,I A~nua Suits !00 PACIFIC BELL Costa Mesa. California 92625 Fax (714) 825-~02 Mobile Services C~-178-11 - ~rogec[ Summ~ & Description Project Background Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) is a new subsidiary of Pacific Bell. Established in July 1994, PBMS plans to offer customers more choices in high quality, reliable and affordable tclccommurdcations products and services by focusing on the emerging new wireless communications systems called Personal Communications Services (PCS). PCS is a rapidly evolving digital technology that is expected to change the future of telecommunications though easy-to-use, lightweight and highly mobile communications devices - including portable phones, pagers, computers and personal digital assistants. In the future, PCS will provide voice and data capabilities for customers' communications needs anywhere and at any time. Unlike most cellular systems, PCS is based on digital technology and thus offers better voice quality and the capacity for multiple communications services. Many experts believe that PCS will be more affordable to a wider range of consumers than today's cellular options. PCS will be more secure than today' s cellular communications devices, and offer better protection from fraud, as well as more privacy. PCS phones will fit in pockets and handbags, and offer such features as voice mail, call- screening, call-waiting, call-referral, short messaging and paging, among others. In addition, the entire system will be connected to 911, thus offering important safety altematives for its customers. Pacific Bell Mobile Services plans to offer PCS services widely throughout Califomia by early 1997. Site Selection The entire system is comprised of small base stations which are located throughout the region in which service is provided. This arrangement allows radio channels to be re-used at non-adjacent base stations. Charmel re-use (recycling), combined with digital technology increases the capacity of the system so it can accommodate the growing demand for wireless mobile, paging, and data services. Three basic reasons trigger the need for the development of new base stations and antennas. A need to improve coverage in areas with diverse topography. Pacific Bell Mobile Services engineers prepare a preliminary design analysis for the San Bemardino County region. The topography and terrain features within the service area are entered into a computer along with a series of variables such as antenna height, topographic features, local interference (adjacent buildings) and equipment characteristics. With this information, the engineers determine a search area which is the best possible location and elevation required for each antenna facility in order to maximize service. When this is complete, the search area maps are forwarded to real estate and site selection consultants for identification of potential sites. Local property owners are then contacted and site lease negotiations are initiated by the site acquisition staff based on various zoning, technical, and topographical considerations. Heavier anticipated customer use. In areas where Pacific Bell Mobile Services anticipates high demand additional sites will be added to insure system capacity for consumers within those service areas. Extending the coverage area. New facilities must be built in areas previously not covered or in areas where service may be substandard due to a variety of technical reasons. Project Design Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) proposes to construct, operate and maintain a PCS wireless communications facility located on a vacant parcel adjacent to 19th Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The subject property has a water tank and located approximately 300' from the intersection of l9th Street and the Cucamonga Canyon Channel. Access to the property is via a dirt road from 19th Street. The existing site configuration is similar to parallelogram and its average dimensions are 125' x 400'. The existing site 3.69 acres or 160,736 square feet. There are no existing buildings, PBMS proposes to erect the monopole in the southwest coruer of the site along with two radio equipment cabinets. The property is currently zoned FC, Flood Control. This proposed commtmications facility requires the processing of a Conditional Use Permit. The 50 foot steel monopole will be finished galvanized gray which tends to dull in color within approximately 6-12 months. Six directional panel antennas (5' high, 8" wide, 4" deep) will be mounted in three sectors as shown on the Site Plan. The antennas will be connected to the radio equipment cabinet (BTS) via co-axial cable contained within the body of the pole structure. The radio equipment cabinets (63" high, 51" wide, 28" deep) will be located on the ground adjacent to the pole structure. Only one BTS unit will be initially installed with the second BTS unit being added when additional network capacity is needed in the future. The all -weather BTS units are similar in size and shape to typical utility cabinets or transformers and are forest green in color. The facility will require its own electrical and telephone services with no other utilities being required. Pacific Bell Mobile Services is required to meet all FAA and FCC regulations. The facility will require periodic maintenance two to three times per month. System Features & Capabilities Personal Communications Services (PCS) is a family of new services that will change telecommunications in two ways. First, it will permit calls to be routed to people instead of places. Calls will follow the user through "follow-me-calling" or through the use of a new PCS personal phone number. Second, PCS will enhance the control people have over their telecommunications services by allowing them to determine when and where they can make and receive calls. Pacific Bell Mobile ServiCes will offer the ability to tie traditional wireline services together with PCS mobile voice and data services. Pacific Bell Mobile Services believes the growth of PCS will be different than that of cellular services, which have traditionally been aimed at business users. While business customers are an integral part of their planned customer base, the company is focusing on developing applications and services for the largely untapped mass market. PCS is based on the newest form of digital wireless technology which improves upon the sound quality of cellular. Complex encryption techniques virmally eliminate the ability to eavesdrop on PCS calls and minimize the risk of unauthorized users placing fraudulent calls on a PCS phone, one of the biggest problems facing the cellular industry today. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-34 FOR PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES LOCATED IN THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-201- 40. A, Recitals. 1. Pacific Bell Mobile Services has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-34 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of March 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 13. 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 360 square foot leased portion of a parcel located on the nodh side of 19th Street, 305.13 feet west of Sapphire, with a street frontage of approximately 156 feet and lot depth of approximately 660 feet, and is presently vacant except for a water well located in the extreme northwest corner of the site; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is the Route 30 Freeway right-of-way; the property to the south is within the City of Upland and improved with single family residences, the properly to the east is zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and improved with single family residences; and the property to the west is zoned Flood Control and is improved with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and access roads; and c. A utility easement occupied by 66 KV transmission lines parallels the site along 19th Street and along the west side of Cucamonga Creek. d. The distance from the proposed monopole to the nearest residence is 240 feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-34 - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES March 13, 1996 Page 2 b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303 of the State CEQA guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1.2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Con'ditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Division 1) This approval is for the installation of a 40-foot high telecommunications monopole and two un-manned radio equipment cabinets. 2) Irrigated landscaping shall be installed on all sides of the lease site, including tall evergreen trees. Detailed Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be approved prior to the issuance of building permits and construction completed prior to the operation of these facilities to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Encfineerino Division 1)Dedicate an additional 11 feet of right-of-way along 19th Street, bringing the total to 44 feet, measured from the centerline. 2) Install street trees along the entire 19th Street frontage of the Cucamonga County Water District parcel on which the monopole will be located. Additional frontage improvements to be deferred at this time include sidewalk and street lights. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-34 - PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES March 13, 1996 Page 3 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: C U p ~ ~"'--' ~ L.-/ SUBJECT: ~ ~ L) ('0 pO(_-/.r--"' APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time LImits Conviction Datc 'Y--.. 1. Approval shall expire. unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ---J not issued or approved use has not co mmenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved ~rior to / t , ._J / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of __/ / 4. Thedevelopershallcommence, participate in, andconsummateorcauselobecommenced, __/ / participated in. or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordalien of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes .__/ / first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Ior the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, il the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance i of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. sc- lo/94 I Comt~ledon Date: This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreementto privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordalien of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is __J / involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of ait other residential projects. B. Site Development ~ 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which __J / include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and Specific Plan and Planned Community. V/~.2. Prior to .any. U_se of tfie project site or business activity being .commenced thereon, all .J / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefacilltyshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtimeasaitUniformBuiidingCodeand .J / State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancbe Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be .~/ / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Ait site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for -J / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. V//6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development .J / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Pen'nit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and .~J / Sheriff's Department (989-6611 ) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. if no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units_._.J / with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, /---..-/ and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall J / be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry waits, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. } SC- 10/94 2 Com~lcdon Date: 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with .__/ / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. Ait building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner. ._.J / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and ~ / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted tor City Planner review and approval prio rto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in coniunction with street improvements. 14.TheC~venants~C~nditi~nsandRes~dcti~ns(CC&Rs)sha~~n~tpr~hibitthekeeping~fequine .__/ / animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option ol keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to beards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of incorporation of the __J / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or · prior to the i~sEJance of building permits, Whichever ocCUrs firS~; ~, recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. )( 16. Allparkways, openareas, andlandscapingshall bepermanentlymaintained bytheproperly .__/ / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or / / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shait prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation. structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and .__/ /.__ maintained in accordance with the Histodc Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further rnoditications to the site including. but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterations which affect t he exlerior of the bu tidings or structures, removal of land mark trees, demolition. relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall. require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units _.J / and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the lronl, side and rea'r elevations Upgraded with architectural ----/ / treatment. detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. SC- 10/94 3 .3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for j / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or J / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffe red from adjacenl properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans, D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans) 1, All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall .__/ / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be -.-J / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, .__/ / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units'shaEI l~e provided with garage do~ar openers if drivewayS'are less {hart 18 feet in ---/ / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. TheC~venan~s'C~ndi~i~nsandRestricti~nssha~~restdct~hes~~rage~frecreati~na~vehic~es ---/ / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitled for the City Planner, Cily Engineer, and .--/ / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval priorto issuance of building permits, E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) X 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planling and model home landscap- / / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier /.__/ in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the g radi ng plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant sh all follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of __trees pergross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, ~. % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and ~ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - /____/ 24oinch box or larger. ~ 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three .__J' / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC- 10/94 4 Comvledon Date: 6. Treesshallbeplantedinareasofpublicviewadjacenttoandalongstr~cturesatarateofone tree per 30 linear feet of building. ---J / 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 orgreater slope, but less than_._/ /.__ 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum. irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. AIIprivateslopesinexcessofSfeet, butlessthanBfeet inverticaiheigntandof2:lergreater ---/ / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area. 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area· Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be Continu- .__/ / ously maintained in a healthy and Ihriving condition by the developer until each individual u n it is sold and occupied bythe buyer. Priorto releasing occupancyfor those units, an inspection shall be. Con.du_cted by the Planning .Division to determine that .they are .in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respen- / / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right. of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning. fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / / · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shaft be _.J / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock. specimen size trees, meander- ..--J / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along ,,~ 14. Landsoapingandirrigationsysternsrequiredtobeinstalledwithinthepublio right-of-wayon .__J / the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. All wallsshallbeprovidedwithdecorativetreatment. If located in public maintenance areas, ___/___/ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and .__/ / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. I///17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of --j / Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucernonga Municipal Code. SC- 10/94 5 Corat~ledon Date: P. Signs I. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. ~ / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and sha, require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and J / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes ._..J / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock __/ / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted .~/ / Special Stud.ie_s Zone for the Red Hill Fau!t, in a standaid format ~s determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway __/ / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the ._J / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuationto beiow45CNEL, the building matedals and constructiontechniquesprovided, and it appropriate, verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans wltl be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies ' ' 1. EmergencysecondaryaccessshallbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire --/ / Protection District Standards. 2. Emergencyaccessshallbeprovided, maintenancefreeandclear, a minimumo1261eetwide ---/ / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be .~/ / submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required tire protection system. 4. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and __/ / location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. __ 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all ---/ / supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. SC- ]0/94 6 Proiecl No. :~ I~"'~ ~./~ APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY D[VIS)ON, (909) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING COND[T[ONS: L Site Development ._~t. The app$icant shall compSy with the lafest adopied Uniform Building Code. Uniform Mechan)- ---/ / oa[ Code, Uniform P)umbing Code, Na(iona$ E[ectFic Code, and al[ other app$)cab[e codes ordinances, and regu)atbns )n effect at the time of [ssuance of relative permits. PSease contacl the Buitd[ng and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicabSe handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / / to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. __.~__3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or __/ / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Developmenl Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. X4. Streetaddre~S~sshal bepmvdedbyiheBuildingOfficiai'after't;'~L-t/parcelmaprecordation ...__/ / and prior to issuance of building permits. ' ' ' J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances .__/ / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2o Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for J / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the ._J / uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for .__/ / building permit application. K, Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City J / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / / perform such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion conlrol boundaries; a Soil Disturbance __/ / Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. · 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at ---J / the time of application for grading plan check. 5. Thefina~gradingpIanssha~~becomp~etedandappr~vedpri~rt~issuance~fbui~dingpermits~ __/ / SC- 10/94 7 J 8. As a custom-lot sut~Jivision. the tollowing requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agree menf executed guaranteetrig completion of all on-si~e ----/ drainage tacilifies necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Salety Division priorto final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto ---J / or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided ---] / properties, are to be installed pdor to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety J / Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses .--J / or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or so me other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 I of the Development Code. L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, .--/ / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, ldcai feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. V 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): on total feet on total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made --J / for all private streets or drives. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: .__/ / 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&RS .,._J / or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with lhe map or pdor to the issuance of ,,d,ng rmits. whe,e no map ,s ,nvo,ved. q sc- 1o/94 8 6. Private drainage easements forcross-lot drainage Shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. ---.-/ / 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-toot minimum build!ng restriction a(ea on the __J / neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: "l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on .~/ / the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street lrees placed outside the public right-of-way J / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private properly. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum .~/ / of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along lhe right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith efiod to acquire the required off-site propedy interests .~/ / necessary to construct the required public improvements, and ff he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 atsuchtimeastheCityacquiresthepropertyinterestsrequiredfortheimprovements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a potlion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal repod obtained by the developer, at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Sireel Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior sireors, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, ._J / landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvemenls shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be __J / constructed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: ._..j / STREET NAME CURB & A.C. SLOE- DRIV~ ~'FREET STREET COMM ~4EDIAN BIKE GIJ'I'FER PVM'T WALK APPR. L)GHTS TREES TRAL SLAND TRAIL OTHER v/ Notes; (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d} If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement plans and construction: '?'D ~t/'~/.,',,-I 57')~?"' ~' a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- .---/ / tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction el the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvate street improve- menls, prior to final map approval or the issuance of but Iding permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pedorrned in public fight-of-way, fees shall be paid and a ---J / construelion permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping; marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit __J / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. · -' - d. Signalconduitwithpullpoxesshallbeinstalledonanynewconstructionorrec~nstructidn .__/ / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BC R, ECR or any other locations approved by the City E nginee r. Notes: __/ / (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all tour comers of intersections per City J / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing Ci'q roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with -~/ / adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be :.~/ / installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. .__J / i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner priorto submittal for first plan check. / / 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for / / review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on the pri* vale streets, fees shall be paid and construclion permits shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any ether permits required. Z 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in .J / accordance with the City's street tree program. SC- 10/94 10 7. Intersection line of site designs Shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with Completion D~[c: adopted policy. __J / a. On collector or larger slreets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, J___/ including driveways. Wails, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within lhe lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by __J / moving the 2 +/- closest street tree s on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: J / 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete pdor to the -~/ / issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards ---/ / shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians. paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting .._J /. Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the J / developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective __/ / Beautification Master Plan: O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or pertions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood /----J protection meascres shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone / / designation removed from the project area. The deveioper's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydroiogic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be s~bmitled to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final / /. map approval or the issuance of building permils, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. sc- 2o/94 11 J 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. ~ / 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. __/ / 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey ovedlows in the event of a --J / blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, J / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as [equired. 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. ~ / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the .---/ / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into --J / one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use ddveway shall 'be provided prior to final map approval or J / issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: J / 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apporlloning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwaoda,'San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline. Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the tollowing agencies lot work within their right-of-way: '._J..___/ 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or torm the Law Enforcement Commenity .__/ / Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be com- ...._/ / pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. kPPLfCANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 987-6405, FOR COMPLIANCE THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1, Melio RooS Community Facilities Districi requirements shall apply to this project. J / 2. Fire flow requirement shall be gallons per minute. .~/ / A. A previous fire flow, conducted revealed gpm available at 20 psi. B. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. C. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed. flushed----/ / and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building mate rials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. 4.Existingfirehydrant~~cati~nsshal~bepr~videdpri~rt~waterp~anappr~vaLRequiredhydrants~ __/ / if any, will be determined by this department. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction,evidence shall be __.J / submitted to the Fire Distdct that temporary water supply forfire protection is availabl_e, pending completion of required fire protection system. 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to .--/ / final inspection. 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: _._/ / Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Other Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodwo rking, plastics manufacuring, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate Ior proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be inslalled and operational immediately upon completion .~J / of sprinkler system. : 9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: J / Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. California Code Regulations Title 24. NFPA 101. Other 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: .~/ / Other SC - ].0/94 13 11. Fire depadment access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. J / 12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. ---/ / 13. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide ---/ / at all times during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. 14. AII trees planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of14'6" from ground up so ---/ / as not to impede fire apparatus. 15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: '--/ / Lighted director within 20 feet of main entrance(s). Standard Directory in main lobby. Other 16. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall----/ / be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordedng information ....... 17. Gated/restricted entry(s) require inslallation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contactthe Fire._J / Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 18. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. ---/ / 19. Plan check fees in the amount of $ have been paid. .--/ / An additional $ shall be paid: Prior to water plan approval. Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 20. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: --J / A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically ~ described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or properly. B. Storage of readily combustible matedaL C. Places of assembly (except churches, schools and other non-profit organizations) D. Bowling alley and pin refinishing. E. Cellulose Nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin). F. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet. G. Garages Motor vehicle repair (H-4) vrl f ,.L.m e yards (oe 00,000 beard eet) 50 SC - 10/94 14 I, Tire rebuilding plants. J, Auto wrecking yards. Junk or waste material handling plants. K. Flammable finishes. Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanIs, electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder coating and organic peroxides and dual com- ponent coatings (per spray booth). L. Magnesium (more tha 10 pounds per day). M. Oil burning equipment operations. N. Ovens (industrial baking and drying). O. Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 pounts of refrigeranl). P. Compressed gases (store, handle or use exceeding 100 cubic feet). Q. Cryogenic fluids (storage, handling or use). R. Dust-producing processes and equipment, S. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage, handling or use). T. High piled combustible stock. U. Liquified petroleum gas (store, handle, transport or use more than 120 gallons). V. Matches (more than 60 Malchman's gross). W. Welding and cutting operations: to conducl welding and/or cutting operations in any occupancy. SO-10/94 15 j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 1996 TO: Brent Le Count, Associate Planner FROM: Dan Watters, Crime Analyst SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 96-02, 10431 Lemon Avenue In response to the questions from Mr. McGuirk about why not compare Lemon and Haven to other intersections is that other intersections are not similar. I tried to compare Lemon and Haven to other intersections that are similar in nature. 19th & Archibald has 1 corner of retail sales xvith apartmentJcondos on 2 sides and residential in the area and a empty lot just to the north. Baseline & Haven has 1 corner of retail sales xvith restaurants and apartment/condos close by with residential in the area. All 3 locations have: Major chain grocery store Fast food service Liquor sales Apartment Complexes Residential Unused land space Granted Lemon and Haven has 2 corners of retail. But the Baseline & H~ven complex has a large.r retail area with 2 restaurants. All things considered I would have expected Baseline more in line xvith Lemon & Haven if everything else xvas equal, instead Baseline & Haven is almost equal to Archibald and 19th. Lemon & Haven Baseline & Haven Archibald & 19th Square 363 295 268 Radius 328 240 233 We have re-studied the area in question and the other sites 2 sites that are similar. The intersection of Archibald and 19th Street and Haven and Baseline. As you can see from the ·_ ·, ·, · . Based on the radius method, which was what Mr. McGuirk obtained, Lemon and Haven has more than 25% more Depu~ repoas. From the histo~ ofarea's within the ci~ that sell alcohol and have enteaainment, there is an projected increase in the amount of police services required. In accordance with the California Business and Professions Code section 23958 it is hereby recommended that the permit based on the use of alcohol be denied. ~-01-1996 B:38PH FROb~ BOOK TRADER 909 484 1105 P. 1 3-B7-1996 3=05PM FROM BOOK TRADER 909 ~84 110B ," Intersection Comparison ~ 0 4, 3 1 L, e m o ri .,. ....c~ ~., -'- ,.,.-' z:_,./t,,,,.., V e ]"f U .e 140 120 t 100 80 raPart 1 II Part 2 60 4O 2O 0 Lemon &Haven Baseline &Haven Archibald & 19th Part 1 = Felony Part 2 = Misdemeanor Intersection Comparison 400 30O mSquare 200 ~Radius 100 0 Lemon & Haven Baseline & Haven Archibald & 19th 363 295 268 328 240 233 Crime Analysis Miles Rancho Cucamonqo Pol~ce Depar~menl: 0 + DR's SQUTHR,~ ,' iZ) i AMBER [~i Murder .~ Rape ~ Robb Weap Robb Sirgerm ~ ADW i I Burg Res Burg Carom 5B MERLOTN i Burg Yah ~ BANYAN ~ ~'~ ~~ ~ Grand Theft m · w i: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GTA m m ~ ~~ i Assault ( X o ~F , aRT, ~ A Forgery ~ '~ ~' (]D " Fraud Z~ >' Z rn e~ i - , o ~'~ 9~~-s~ --, z x2d m EM~Nt ,~~ Narcotics DRANGE ~ ' ~i: ' ~}.-- .~ ~ ~:.~ Alcohol Viol Z~ :-:::~- ~ ~ ({2 Drunk ~ ~ ~ t .. -., ,.~ Disord Cond E C ,,,, DUI ~ ' ~" -;N. Vandalism .,) z · ~ 171 ~. Receiving  <C ThefL ~ ~ ~~~ ~ i WP'C°ncealed FINCH I WP-Felony ~.-[ , ~ - .IwP-.i~d .~ Car Jacking li '~ % ~ ~ " ~ // t WP-ShooLing , - ~ o z ~ ~ Graffi[i Felony c~ . (:'~ ~--~T? ~ ~ a Out of Range 03/11/96 1 Lemon / Haven Last 180 Days (area) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 0 Rape 0 Robb Weap 3 Robb Strgarm 2 ADW 8 Burglary Res 27 Burglary Com 2 Burglary Veh 32 Grand Theft 15 Auto Theft 32 Assault 20 TOTAL 141 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 3 Fraud 1 Sex Felony' 1 Sex Misd 2 Narcotics 3 Alcohol Viol 2 Drunk 3 Disord Cond 9 DUI 6 Vandalism 28 Arson 2 Receiving 0 Theft 27 TOTAL 87 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 2 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 2 Day of Week Count Monday 51 Tuesday 42 Wednesday 50 Thursday 61 Friday 57 Saturday 59 Sunday 43 TOTAL 363 03/11/96 2 Lemon / Haven Last 180 Days (area) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 18 2 15 3 15 4 13 5 14 6 10 7 7 8 16 9 15 10 8 11 12 12 5 13 17 14 12 15 5 16 6 17 14 18 12 19 14 "' 2'0 13 21 11 22 8 23 12 24 4 25 .9 26 17 27 20 28 15 29 12 30 11 31 3 TOTAL 363 Month Count January 71 February 65 March 25 April 0 May 0 june 0 July 0 August 0 September 34 October 49 November 57 December 62 TOTAL 363 03/11/96 3 Lemon / Haven Last 180 Days (area) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994 0 1995 202 1996 161 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 363 Time Block Count 0000-0059 12 0100-0159 19 0200-0259 10 0300-0359 1 0400-0459 6 0500-0559 5 0600-0659 8 . . , 0700-0759 18 0800-0859 22 0900-0959 16 1000-1059 11 1100-1159 18 1200-1259 20 1300-1359 25 1400-1459 19 1500-1559 18 1600-1659 25 1700-1759 27 1800-1859 16 1900-1959 13 2000-2059 15 2100-2159 17 2200-2259 11 2300-2359 11 TOTAL 363 Crinne Analysis , DR's Roncho Cucamonga Police Depot[merit: ['E_] Murder r ._ Rape Robb Weep UTH AMBER Robb Strgarm OCA " -I- ADW - I Burg Res ~ Burg Carom .................................................................................................... -~,Burg Veh BANYAN -, __~ ~r Grand Theft  1 ~ GTA .7_ · Assault A Forgery ~j~ Fraud Sex Felony Sex Misd Narcotics ~ ~,~ Alcohol Viol ._P Drunk ~ (:'.~,)Disord Cond DU~ b,b, 7,,- :)i: Vandalism -~L Arson qNCH Receiving d;:; T h e f t 'X ~ I 7""' ~ WP-Concealed WP-Felony WP- Misd WP-Shoo[ing Layers t cc~r- Jacl,,ing CITIES -- HIGHWAYS -- SFREETS Miles Graffiti Misd RD -- NSTRE · D~tepoh-, 0 0., 0.2 '~' Craffiti Felony FREEWAYS RAILROADS · Out. of Rclnge 03/11/96 1 Lemon & Haven Last 180 Days (.5 radius Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 0 Rape 0 Robb Weap 3 Robb Strgarm 2 ADW 7 Burglary Res 23 Burglary Com 2 Burglary Veh 29 Grand Theft 11 Auto Theft 29 Assault 18 TOTAL 124 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 3 Sex Felony' 1 Sex Misd 2 Narcotics 3 Alcohol Viol 2 Drunk 3 Disord Cond 7 DUI 5 Vandalism 26 Arson 2 Receiving 0 Theft 25 TOTAL 80 Weapons Count Concealed Felony 2 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 2 Day of Week Count Monday 47 Tuesday 39 Wednesday 43 Thursday 58 Friday 53 Saturday 52 Sunday 36 TOTAL 328 03/11/96 2 Lemon & Haven Last 180 Days (.5 radius) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of'Month Count 1 17 2 15 3 11 4 12 5 13 6 9 7 7 8 16 9 13 10 8 11 9 12 5 13 14 14 11 15 5 16 5 17 13 18 12 19 14 20 12 21 9 22 7 23 12 24 4 25 6 26 ~6 27 18 28 12 29 11 30 10 31 2 TOTAL 328 Month Count January 63' February 53 March 21 April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 32 October 46 November 53 December 60 TOTAL 328 03/11/96 3 Lemon & Haven Last 180 Days (.5 radius) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994 0 1995 191 1996 137 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 328 Time Block Count 0000-0059 11 0100-0159 17 0200-0259 9 0300-0359 1 0400-0459 4 0500-0559 5 0600-0659 8 0700-0759 16 0800-0859 20 0900-0959 12 1000-1059 9 1100-1159 18 1200-1259 20 1300-1359 22 1400-1459 16 1500-1559 17 1600-1659 21 1700-1759 25 1800-1859 15 1900-1959 12 2000-2059 14 2100-2159 16 2200-2259 10 2300-2359 10 TOTAL 328 Crir'ne Analysis Rancho Cucamonqa Pol~ceDelaartmeOl: o on 0.2 . ,OTOR,A DR's 17 ~ L',"::I': [~_] Murder < ' ~"',~ Rape ""TT'~'i~" :% '> i ' Robb Weap ", _ "1" ADW It ~ I Burg Res \ .(,~, Burg 7t:::;,_, ~ Burg Veh -- ~ Grand Theft "' ~ GTA ,;% Assault - Fraud - Sex Felony ~ f.'~', B~SELi~,~''}~~ Sex Misd ;] ~=~p Narcotics '~' ~ '~ ~ Alcohol Viol ~t ~ (';' r'~' .Z. Drunk ~]Z~ ' ~ ~ [.'.)Disord Cond ' ' ~D ~ i -:,z- Vandalism /~ j [ Arson __ I~` ~ ~ _ ~ I~ Receiving ¢ <F) Theft ~' ~ ~ I WP-Concealed K ~ Z~ ~ I WP-Felony ~ ~ J WP-Misd ~ 5~~ ~ t WP-ShooLing _-~ Car docking (~ Graffiti Misd ~i ~ ~ ~ Graffiti Felony , ~ % · Out of Range r-,. ,~ . 03/11/96 1 Baseline / Haven Last 180 Days (area) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 1 Rape 0 Robb Weap 1 Robb Strgarm 1 ADW 9 Burglary Res 27 Burglary Com 5 Burglary Veh 16 Grand Theft 10 Auto Theft 16 Assault 10 TOTAL 96 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 1 Fraud 0 ..... SeX Felony' 4 Sex Misd 3 Narcotics 4 Alcohol Viol 0 Drunk 1 Disord Cond 7 DUI 4 Vandalism 23 Arson 0 Receiving 1 Theft 33 TOTAL 81 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 0 Day of Week Count Monday 39 Tuesday 43 Wednesday 44 Thursday 41 Friday 54 Saturday 37 Sunday 37 TOTAL 295 03/11/96 2 Baseline / Haven Last 180 Days (area) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 8 2 11 3 14 4 11 5 6 6 6 7 6 8 10 9 12 10 12 11 8 12 15 13 13 14 5 15 10 16 6 17 9 18 5 19 7 20 11 21 !1 22 15 23 13 24 4 25 7 26 19 27 12 28 8 29 7 30 12 31 2 TOTAL 295 Month Count January 55 February 59 March 10 April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 24 October 54 November 39 December 54 TOTAL 295 03/11/96 3 Baseline / Haven Last 180 Days (area) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994 0 1995 171 1996 124 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 295 Time Block Count 0000-0059 11 0100-0159 9 0200-0259 5 0300-0359 6 0400-0459 4 0500-0559 2 0600-0659 5 0700-0759 13 0800-0859 7 0900-0959 15 1000-1059 27 1100-1159 15 1200-'1259 15 1300-1359 21 1400-1459 13 1500-1559 23 1600-1659 17 1700-1759 16 1800-1859 12 1900-1959 20 2000-2059 14 2100-2159 12 2200-2259 8 2300-2359 5 TOTAL 295 Crime Analysis : DR's Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, ['_1:__] Murder I '""' ~F""' q JL Rape ,D -A - Burg Comm i Burg Veh ~ ~< r4 ~~, -k Grand Theft \ /~_j~,, F,7~ ~ GTA 4 · 5 // . Assault m A Forgery ~ '~ Fraud o Sex Felony i ,,-,! _.__ :x , i~ 5 _ : -, !'~ %`; ~.~ Alcohol Vial "' ~ P' Drunk :i!: "' ~ 15 ~ (:7')aisord Cond > Z J :X: Vandalism ~-- -, o 11 Arso~ ~ > I --, ~ ~ Receiving aa ~ ..~ ~ . c!:'.', Theft ~o, ~ "' ""' WP-Concealed L o~ ~, ~ _ WP-Felony ~ WP-Misd m~_j ' "' WP-Shooting Layers t Car Jacking CITIES -- NSTRE · Datapoint Miles Groffiti Misd ~ ~ GraffiU Felony ~ FREEWAYS RAILROADS 0 0.1 o.2 -- HFGHWAYS -- STREETS · Oul. or Range 03/11/96 1 Baseline / Haven Last 180 Days (.5 radius Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 1 ' Rape 0 Robb Weap 1 Robb Strgarm 1 ADW 9 Burglary Res 20 Burglary Com 5 Burglary Veh 11 Grand Theft 7 Auto Theft 12 Assault 8 TOTAL 75 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 1 Fraud 0 SeX Felony 3 Sex Misd 2 Narcotics 3 Alcohol Viol 0 Drunk 1 Disord Cond 7 DUI 4 Vandalism 17 Arson 0 Receiving 1 Theft 29 TOTAL 68 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 0 Day of Week Count Monday 33 Tuesday 32 Wednesday 38 Thursday 32 Friday 42 Saturday 31 Sunday 32 TOTAL 240 03/11/96 2 Baseline / Haven Last 180 Days (.5 radius) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 6 2 9 3 11 4 7 5 4 6 6 7 6 8 8 9 12 10 8 11 6 12 12 13 9 14 5 15 8 16 6 17 7 18 3 19 4 ...... ~0 10 21 9 22 14 23 11 24 3 25 4 26 16 27 9 28 7 29 6 30 12 31 2 TOTAL 240 Month Count January 46 February 49 March 7 April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 16 October 46 November 31 December 45 TOTAL 240 03/11/96 3 Baseline / Haven Last 180 Days (.5 radius) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year .Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994 0 1995 138 1996 102 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 240 Time Block Count 0000-0059 10 0100-0159 7 0200-0259 5 0300-0359 4 0400-0459 3 0500-0559 2 0600-0659 5 0700-0759 10 0800-0859 3 0900-0959 14 1000-1059 18 1100-1159 15 1200-1259 14 1300-1359 14 1400-1459 10 1500-1559 19 1600-1659 13 1700-1759 15 1800-1859 10 1900-1959 16 2000-2059 12 2100-2159 9 2200-2259 7 2300-2359 5 TOTAL 240 Crime Anolysis Rencho Cuc<amonqe Pol~ce Depert:ment 0 0.~ LEMON .___(~) I __1 :,;(: D R's L. -X-'~- ._, , : O~ANGE j.'_-ff_]~ ~ __ - ,__ .... 3D ~ c ~[ ~ Robb Weap < f m ~ ~ ADW x q i ~ ~ Robb Strgorm :F)~ ~ ~ t Burg Res ~i_4 HI MLAND Burg Conam ~' -, (() ~ Burg Veh ~)~:~) ~ Grand Theft 11  Assault ~ d ~ ~ Forgery  " ~; "~[ Sex Felony B ~ ~, ~ Narcotics '~ o z e ~-1 ~4 ~ z ~ (t) (") Disord Cond < ~'~ > ~ > DUI fi - ~ ~ (' ') :~<~: Vandalism ~ --~ . F _ ao~_ j[ Arson ~1 Receiving AVALON ~ ~ Theft ~ ORIA: ,'- ~ ~ . i Wp_Concealed ~3 ~i - .~ 5' I WP-Felony I 'c ~ o Jt 11 ~ ,~ .I WP-Misd WP-Shooting ~ ~~ [ MONT~& ~ , t Graffiti Misd ~~~ ~ ~ Graffi[i Felony ~ · Out of Range 03/11/96 1 Archibald / 19th Last 180 Days (area) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 2 Rape 0 Robb Weap 3 Robb Strgarm 4 ADW 17 Burglary Res 10 Burglary Com 4 Burglary Veh 21 Grand Theft 8 Auto Theft 17 Assault 10 TOTAL 96 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 2 Fraud 1 Sex Felony 1 Sex Misd 0 Narcotics 8 Alcohol Viol 3 Drunk 1 Disord Cond 17 DUI 12 Vandalism 19 Arson 1 Receiving 2 Theft 14 TOTAL 81 Weapons Count Concealed 1 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 1 Day of Week Count Monday 40 Tuesday 38 Wednesday 31 Thursday 41 Friday 36 Saturday 37 Sunday 45 TOTAL 268 03/11/96 2 Archibald / 19th Last 180 Days (area) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 9 2 12 3 12 4 t0 5 10 6 10 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 8 11 8 12 8 13 9 14 6 15 4 16 7 17 6 18 10 19 7 20 6 21 14 22 6 23 15 24 9 25 10 26 4 27 13 28 10 29 7 30 10 31 4 TOTAL 268 Month Count January 55 February 52 March 11 April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 18 October 36 November 44 December 52 TOTAL 268 03/11/96. 3 Archibald 19th Last 180 Days (area) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994 0 1995 150 1996 118 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 268 Time Block Count 0000-0059 10 0100-0159 14 0200-0259 7 0300-0359 2 0400-0459 3 0500-0559 6 0600-0659 4 0700-0759 9 0800-0859 18 0900-0959 14 1000-1059 16 1100-1159 7 1200-1259 18 1300-1359 9 1400-1459 6 1500-1559 12 1600-1659 14 1700-1759 15 1800-1859 17 1900-1959 20 2000-2059 16 2100-2159 15 2200-2259 9 2300-2359 7 TOTAL 268 Crime Anol)/sis DR's Roncho Cucemonge Police Deportmen.~, [~] Murder L I__.1 j[, Rape Robb Weop · ORANGE ,, ~ Robb Strgorrn + ADW I Burg Res Burg Comna ~i, Burg Vel-i "A- Grand Theft < i GTA ,~. a Assault ba Z: GARDEN ~_~ V~______~ ~ Forgery E { ' Fraud ._. ~ .-.~ 19/H "', -- 0 Sex Misd '~' ~. ~ 4~ NarcoUcs L~ , . ....jONQUiL ,~ :X: Vandalism ~'X* Receiving. ~ ' WP-Misd ~t, I WP-Shooting Loyer~s Car docking CITIES -- NSTRE · Dotepoint_ Miles ~" Grafl:iti Ivlisd -- FREEWAYS RAILROADS o o.I 0.2 Graffiti Felony · Oul. of Range -- HIGHWAYS -- STREETS 03/1t/96 1 19th / Archibald Last 180 Days (.5 radius) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 1 Rape 0 Robb Weap 3 Robb Strgarm 4 ADW 12 Burglary Res 9 Burglary Com 4 Burglary Veh 19 Grand Theft 4 Auto Theft 17 Assault 8 TOTAL 81 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 2 ..... ~raud 1 Sex Felony 1 Sex Misd 0 Narcotics 6 Alcohol Viol 3 Drunk 1 Disord Cond 14 DUI 12 Vandalism 16 Arson 1 Receiving 2 Theft 11 TOTAL 70 Weapons Count Concealed 1 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 1 Day of Week Count Monday 36 Tuesday 30 Wednesday 27 Thursday 37 Friday 32 Saturday 32 Sunday 39 TOTAL 233 03/11/96 2 19th / Archibald Last 180 Days (.5 radius) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 9 2 12 3 9 4 9 5 8 6 8 7 7 8 6 9 8 10 8 11 7 12 7 13 8 14 5 15 4 16 4 17 6 18 10 19 5 20 4 21 12 22 5 23 14 24 6 25 8 26 4 27 12 28 9 29 7 30 8 31 4 TOTAL 233 Month Count January 50 February 40 March 9 April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 14 October 30 November 40 December 50 TOTAL 233 03/11/96 3 19th / Archibald Last 180 Days (.5 radius) Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994' 0 1995 134 1996 99 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 233 Time Block Count 0000-0059 9 0100-0159 14 0200-0259 6 0300-0359 1 0400-0459 3 0500-0559 5 0600-0659 3 0700-0759 8 0800-0859 14 0900-0959 12 1000-1059 11 1100-1159 6 1200-1259 16 1300-1359 7 '1400-1459 5 1500-1559 11 1600-1659 11 1700-1759 1800-1859 16 1900-1959 19 2000-2059 14 2100-2159 14 2200-2259 8 2300-2359 6 TOTAL 233 RECEIVED Mrs. Alicia Niemirow 6341 Revere Ave. MAR 6 1996 Alta Loma, CA. 91737 Ph: (909) 980-4100 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division March 4, 1996 Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 RE: PROPOSED BAR AT 10431 LEMON AVE. UNIT N Dear Planning Division, Due to health concerns, I will be unable to attend the public ....... he~r~ng scheduled forMarch 13,1996..However, I am writing to.tell you that as a cOnsCientious citizen'for'more thag.siXteen years, I am wholeheartedly dpposed to the proposed qrantinq of the requested permit; .and feel 'that' having: a bar socl0se.-.-to..my..ho~e ~9uld jeopardize' my and my fami'ly's. health and~lfAr~.-: , ,~, .::. :. The site requesting the permit is located on property abutting my backyard. The only barrier between this property and my back yard is a vacant lot and a mere 3 1/2 foot wall which is tantamount to having no barrier at all. Several years ago I along with many other residents in my neighborhood successfully defeated the proposal of an all night car wash. As it is now, every passer-by on the adjacent property can look into the privacy of my home. And all too frequently people traversing this property throw their garbage, beer cans, ash tray. contents into my backyard. More disturbing however, is the fact that many peop].ejump this wall and use my backyard as a thoroughfare to gain access to the street. Only last week, my neighbor informed me that a young adult male carrying a package and in a great hurry, jumped over the wall into my back yard and over my front wall. Only last year my house was broken into, ransacked and burglarized, and I arrived home just as the armed perpetrators escaped. The police department were convinced that the perpetrators had been watching my whereabouts from this neighboring property. Imagine how much worse my situation will be when confronted by people who have had too much to drink? Where there is a bar, there will be people that drink too much, become boisterous and loud, and.who assemble near their parked cars when the bar lets out; The~ will throw out their garbage into my back yard, make noise at allhoUrs. of.~he'night, look intomy bedroom etc., and deprive me of my privacy. I will forever fear leaving my home, and will forever fear staying in it. I cherish my neighborhood and its maintenance of a safe and w~olesome family environment, not just for myself but for my neighbors and their children- Having a bar located within a few feet of our residences and but a few feet from a school can only bring about problems. There are enough locations in Alta Loma to go drinking in. We do not need another one. Another issue I would like to address is the fact that I seem to be one of the few residents receiving this notice. I've spoken to several neighbors who did not receive this notice and are also opposed to the proposed bar. I hope the city will consider my plea and maintain the concern for its residents it has so long been recognized for and preserved. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely Yours, Alicia Niemirow AWNINGS BY D. A. IIMMER MAll_: BOX 160, CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 (909} 390~1)Z20 . (8<)O) 585-3883 , FAX: {909) March 13, 1996 City Planning Commission ATTENION: Scott RE: 10413 Lemon I am writing this letter in concern of the Pool Hall/Bar which is to be located at 10413 Lemon. I live directly south of this location. I have grave concerns with this business in this area. There are already police helicopters in this area 2 to 3 times per week flying overhead because of the apartments directly across (north) of where'the proposed Pool Hall/Bar would be. There are also alot of teens in the area, which I have a 15 yr. old daughter. This type of place would give the youth of our community the wrong place to congregate. Daniel'Zimmer 6332 Haven Ave. Alta Loma, CA 91737 Donald R. Phillips 10150 Bristol Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca., 91373 Telephone i909) 989-7692 Dear Sirs: This letter is regarding the proposed pool hall at Ilaven & Lemon. I live near intersection and am very concerned that it would am'act undesirable people. As it is we already have too many hanging around at Lucky's, making it seem unsal~ to go shopping there at night. My wife & I have lived here for 17 years. We didn't oppose the government subsidized low rent housing at the north west ccmer of that inlersection because we thought it a good thing to give poor people a chance to li~'e in a nice neighborhood. However, we have noticed m~ increase in cringe since then. I believe addh~g a pool hall would make the situation intolerable. I would have allended fl~e open hearing tonight to express my opposition but I can't because I just saw it in the paper loday and I have to work tonight. I am the plmnnacy manager at the Thrifiys at 19th &Camelian. Sincerely yours, Donald R. Phillips THE ALTA LOMA GARDENS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED S, Craig Justice, Secretary of the Board 6330 Haven Avenue Alta Loma, CA 91737 909/466'2802; 909/987-8639 RECEIVED March 11, 1996 Planning Division MAR 12 1996 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Planning Division RE: CUP 96-02-JERRY MCGUIRK Dear Planning Division Staff: When this shopping center was built, the developers agreed to place trash bins on the north side of the building (in the parldng area). They redfew their drawings to reflect this concession (see drawings re CUP 8%04, a file that I recently consulted). Currently, there are dumpsters in the back alley just over the wall adjacent to my home. I hear the Yukon dumpster track pick up the dumpster every morning around 6:15 a.m. The noise is deafening and the location of this dumpster is in violation of the agreement made when the property was developed. If such a simple provision in the CUP for this property (where to locate a dumpster) cannot be adhered to, I am wondering if the conditions of this new CUP (96-02) will be adhered to. Will the pool hall later become a dance club? Will the beer/wine license give way to a full liquor set-up? Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoning "is intended to provide areas for innmediate day-to-day convenience shopping and services for the residence of the mediate neighborhood." Performance standards are supposed to generate "compatible and harmonious" uses with the neighboring residential areas. Before any CUP is granted, I would like to ask that written parameters be included in the file to state: 1. Trash dumpsters will be located on the north side of the building. 2. The alley-way behind the building be somehow closed off to eliminate the possibility of vehicles (except emergency) driving through and around the building. This should be done specifically to prevent (a) late-night going home traffic from the bar and (b) Trash Trucks from passing through, creating a disturbance so close to our homes. 3. Limitations on using the establistunent's rear door (i.e. employees only), so as to reduce foot and vehicular traffic behind the building and in the alley-way. These reservations are quite reasonable, I think, and the immediate problem of the dumpsmrs should be attended to regardless of the disposition of this CUP application. Thank you for your consideration. Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. For the board of directors, \ Si~c~s~'CC~ · N/S/Craig Justice_/ih.D. Secretary, Board of Directors The Alta Loma Gardens Homeowners Association, Inc. RECEIVED March 08, 1996 Cily of Rancho Cucamonga Jerry R, McOui rk Planning Division 10455 Poplar Street Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91737 Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Attention: Ronald Bieberdorf, Chief of Police 10510 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 19730 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 96-02.10531 Lemon Ave Denial Dear Mr. Bieberdorf; On approximately-February 29, 1996, the City Planning Department sent me a copy of the memorandum from from Ronald Bieberdorf, Chief of Police, recommending that my Conditional Use Permit be denied. This denial was based on the Police Department records of Deputy Reports of three intersections in this area. Attach to this memorandum were studies supposedly conducted by the police department. The area which we are concerned with, Lemon and Haven, according to the police department, has a total of 443 Deputy Reports, (report dated 02/29/96). The REPORTS WE requested and received, March 7, 1996, have the Deputy Reports for the Lemon and Haven intersection at 325 calls. Both sets of reports are based on a one-half mile radius around the intersection and are for the last 180 days from 02/26/96. As you can see there are many Major discrepancies that need explaining. We requested and received copies of Deputy Reports from several other intersection/areas of Rancho Cucamonga. Listed below are the figures from these reports. AREA/INTERSECTION DEPUTY REPORTS OUR REPORTS Lemon & Haven 443 325 Archibald & 19th 215 _7~ ~c23y Baseline & Haven 235 Vineyard & Foothill No Report 310 Foothill & Archibald No Report 423 19th & Carnilian No Report Baseline & Archibald No Report 365 Conditional Use Permit Page 2 96-02.10531 Lemon Ave Denial 03/08/96 Why was the Lemon & Haven intersection compared to the lowest two areas/intersection? The reports we received indicate Lemon & Haven is no worse that other areas/intersection in this city. Attached are copies of Deputy Reports from your office dated 02/26/96, and received by me on 02/29/96, and copies of the the Deputy Reports we received dated 03/07/96, and received 03/07/96. I feel there maybe some conflict of interest, prejudice or discrimination in the discrepancies of these reports. I am requesting you re-evaluate your report in a fair and consistent manner. Sincerely, Jer~ryR. McGuirk cc: Brent Le Count, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning John D. Mannerino, Attorney At Law Jorge Lopez, A.B.C. W. J. Alexander, Mayor CITY OF R.ANCI40 CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: February 28, 1996 TO: Brent Le Count, Associate Planner C~ FROM: Ranaid Biebcrdorf Ch e 'o 'Po ice SUBJECT: Cnnditional Ilse Permit 96-02. 10431 I,cmnn Avenue As requested we have studied the area in qaestion and 2 other sites that are similar. The intersection of Archibald and 19th Street arid llaven and Baseline. As you can see from the attached studies the one-half mile area around the intersection of l,emnn and lqavcn Avenue has an apparently larger number of Deputy Reports than the other 2 sites. .... ' Lemodand Haven has and average of twice tile number ofrep~lrts. From the history aforeo's within the city that sell alcohol and have entertainment, there is an increase ill the amount police services required. In accordance with the California Business and Professions (:l,de section 23958 it is hereby recommended that the permit based on the use of alcohol be denied. RB/dw -02/26/96 Lemon & Haven last 180 days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part ! Crime Counn Homicide 0 Rape i Robb Weap 3 Robb Strgarm 3 ~DW 9 Burglary Res 33 Burglary Com 5 Burglary Veh 40 Grand Theft 15 Auto Theft 40 Assault 1S TOTAL 168 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 4 Fraud ! -'Sex Felony- 2 Sex Misd 2 Narcotics 6 Alcohol Viol 2 Drunk 2 Disord Cond 15 DUi !5 Vanda!i~m 35 Arson 2 Receiving 0 Theft 31 TOTAL 117 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 3 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 3 Day of Week 'Count Monday 62 Tuesday 50 wednesday 52 Thursday 81 Friday 64 Saturday 77 Sunday 57 TOTAL 443 Last 180 Days from 02/26/96 Archibald and 19th Part 1 Crime Coun[ Homicide 1 Rape 0 Robb Weap 3 Robb $trgarm 2 ADW 12 Burglary Res 12 Burglary Com 4 Burglary Veh 13 Grand Theft 6 Auto Theft 15 Assault 7 TOTAL 75 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 2 .... Fraud 1 Sex Felony 1 Sex Misd 0 Narcotics 7 Alcohol Viol 3 Drunk 1 Disord Cond 10 DUI 10 Vandalism ~6 Arson 1' Receiving 2 Theft 10 TOTAL 64 Weapons Count Concealed 1 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 1 Day of Week Count Monday 34 Tuesday 30 Wednesday 22 Thursday 32 Friday 32 Saturday 28 Sunday 37 'TOTAL 215 Baseline and Haven Last 180 days from 02/26/96 Part 1 Crime Count Homicide Rape 0 Robb Weap 1 Robb Strgarm 0 ADW 7 Burglary Res 22 Bu~rglary Corn 4 Burglary Veh 11 Grand Theft 9 Auto Theft 12 Assault 9 TOTAL 76 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 1 Fraud 0 Sex Felony 3 Sex Misd 3 Narcotics 3 Alcohol Viol 0 Drunk 1 Disord Cond DUI 4 Vandalism 16 Arson 0 Receiving Theft 29 TOTAL 67 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 0 Mied O Shooting 0 TOTAL 0 Day of week count Monday 29 Tuesday 33 Wednesday 39 Thurgdsy 36 Friday 39 Saturday ~8 Sunday 31 TOTAL 235 Crlrne Ancllysjs DR's R<~,-~<::l-lo Cucarnonga Police Depal~kr-r, en~ [~] ~/iurder ...... .....:-~ .............\' ................................ ~ Rape ;~ ~L/'FH AMBER .... Robb Strgarrn ~¢OCA ' + ADW I Burg Res ~ Burg Carom ..............................................................................................~Burg V~h BANYAN x __ *Grand theft > ~ GTA Assault ~ Forgery  Fraud Sex Felony Q Sex ~4isd ~ ~ Narcotics ~ Alcol~ol Viol ~ P Drunk ~ ("Z)Disord Cond ~ '~' DUI i :X: Vandalism " ~~ ~ Arson ~~ ~ ~~ Receiving " WP-Concealed WP-F'elor~y WP-~isd ~ x WP-Shoo~ing Layers ~ Car dacking CITIES -- HIGHWAYS STREETS ~ Grarfi~i ~isd :""': -- NSTRE ~ DaLapoinL a a. a.~ t GrarrXi Felony ~2EEWAYS RAILROADS · OuL of Ronge · /96 1 Lemon and Haven Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 0 Rape 0 Robb Weap 3 Robb Strgarm 2 ADW 6 Burglary Res 23 Burglary Com 2 Burglary Veh 29 Grand Theft 11 Auto Theft 30 Assault 17 TOTAL 123 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 3 Fraud 1 · . , Sex Felony 1 Sex Misd 2 Narcotics 4 Alcohol Viol 2 Drunk 3 Disord Cond 7 DUI 5 Vandalism 26 Arson 2 Receiving 0 Theft 24 TOTAL 80 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 2 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 2 Day of Week Count Monday 49 Tuesday 40 Wednesday 43 Thursday 58 Friday 49 Saturday 50 Sunday 36 'TOTAL 325 2 Lemon and Haven Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 16 2 14 3 11 4 12 5 13 6 9 7 7 8 13 9 12 10 8 11 11 12 6 13 14 14 11 15 5 16 5 17 13 18 12 19 14 20 12 21 9 22 7 23 12 24 4 25 6 26 16 27 18 28 12 29 11 30 10 31 2 TOTAL 325 Month Count January 63 February 53 March 13 April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 37 October 46 November 53 December 60 TOTAL 325 03/07/96 3 Lemon and Haven Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994 0 1995 195 1996 115 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 310 Time Block Count 0000-0059 9 0100-0159 9 0200-0259 8 0300-0359 4 0400-0459 5 0500-0559 3 0600-0659 12 .... ' 0700-0759 10 0800-0859 13 0900-0959 11 1000-1059 18 1100-1159 18 1200-1259 14 1300-1359 14 1400-1459 19 1500-1559 13 1600-1659 15 1700-1759 22 1800-1859 20 1900-1959 11 2000-2059 20 2100-2159 14 2200-2259 13 2300-2359 15 TOTAL 310 Crinae Anotysis DR's Rc~r'lcl'l,:> Cuccarnong<.l Police Depc}r"irner'l.[ ....... [~] Murcler ............. · _'~ '~~ J~. Rape ~ ~ ~ Robb Weap \~i ./ -- (~ Robb S[rgorm ....... ~ + ADW .-dN- I Burg Res ~ :'~, ~ '~' Burg Comff '~ ~ ~ Burg Veh  i Grand Theft i GTA ~'N ~ ~ ~ Assault ~ Fraud Sex Felony O Sex Misd ~ Narcotics ~',~J Alcohol Viol P' Drunk '~' ,)Disord Cond ~ '~" DUI :~: Vandalism  Arson ' Receiving '~, l'heft ('~ '[ WP-Concealed VEJAR WP-Felony WP-Misd WP-Shooling Layers t Car Jacking CITIES -- HIGHWAYS -- STREETS Miles Graffiti Misd ~ ~ Graffiti Felony RD -- NSTRE ~ Datapoint o 0.~ o.2 FREEWAYS RAILROADS · Out of Range 03/07/96 Archibald and 19th Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 1 Rape 0 Robb Weap 3 Robb Strgarm 3 ADW 12 Burglary Res 10 Burglary Com 4 Burglary Veh 19 Grand Theft 5 Auto Theft 17 Assault 8 TOTAL 82 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 2 Fraud 1 ...... Sex'Felony 1 Sex Misd 0 Narcotics 6 Alcohol Viol 3. Drunk 1 Disord Cond 14 DUI 12 Vandalism 16 Arson 1 Receiving 2 Theft 1t TOTAL 70 Weapons Count Concealed 1 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 1 Day of Week Count Monday 37 Tuesday 31 Wednesday 27 Thursday 35 Friday 31 Saturday 33 Sunday 40 TOTAL 234 03/07/96 2 Archibald and 19th Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 9 2 12 3 9 4 9 5 8 6 7 7 6 8 5 9 9 10 9 11 8 12 8 13 9 14 5 15 4 16 4 17 6 18 10 19 5 20 ' 4 21 11 22 5 23 14 24 6 25 8 26 4 27 12 28 9 29 7 30 8 31 4 TOTAL 234 Month Count January 50 February 40 March 5 April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 SepCember 19 October 30 November 40 December 50 TOTAL 234 03/07/96 3 Archibald and 19th Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994 0 1995 139 1996 95 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 234 Time Block Count 0000-0059 9 0100-0159 15 0200-0259 6 0300-0359 1 0400-0459 3 0500-0559 5 0600-0659 3 0700-0759 8 "0800-0859' 15 0900-0959 13 1000-1059 12 · 1100-1159 6. 1200-1259 15 1300-1359 8 1400-1459 4 1500-1559 12 1600-1659 10 1700-1759 13 1800-1859 16 1900-1959 19 2000-2059 13 2100-2159 14 2200-2259 8 2300-2359 6 TOTAL 234 1 Vineyard and Foothill Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 2 Rape t Robb Weap 2 Robb Strgarm 2 ADW 11 Burglary Res 12 Burglary Com 5 Burglary Veh 16 Grand Theft 9 Auto Theft 18 Assault 12 TOTAL 90 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 2 Fraud 0 .... Sex Felony 3 Sex Misd 1 Narcotics 9 Alcohol Viol Drunk 4 Disord Cond 14 DUI 23 Vandalism 19 Arson 0 Receiving 3 Theft 21 TOTAL 99 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 0 Day of Week Count Monday 54 Tuesday 36 Wednesday 52 Thursday 45 Friday 48 Saturday 36 Sunday 39 TOTAL 310 2 Vineyard and Foothill Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 9 2 13 3 11 4 9 5 3 6 10 7 5 8 12 9 12 10 6 11 7 12 10 13 13 14 13 15 17 16 14 17 13 18 11 19 12 · 20- .. 6 21 7 22 12 23 7 24 4 25 11 26 15 27 9 28 11 29 9 30 17 31 2 TOTAL 310 Month Count January 68 February 39 March 8 April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 42 October 70 November 36 D~cember 47 TOTAL 310 )3/07/96 3 Vineyard and Foothill Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994 0 1995 195 1996 115 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 310 Time Block Count 0000-0059 9 0100-0159 9 0200-0259 8 0300-0359 4 0400-0459 5 0500-0559 3 0600-0659 12 0700-0759 10 .... 0800~0859 13 0900-0959 11 1000-1059 18 1100-1159 18 1200-1259 14 1300-1359 14 1400-1459 19 1500-1559 13 1600-1659 15 1700-1759 22 1800-1859 20 1900-1959 11 2000-2059 20 2100-2159 14 2200-2259 13 2300-2359 15 TOTAL 310 Crime Analysis DR's Roncho Cucamonga Police Departr-ner~t: [~] Murder LANGSTON ,~, Rape Robb Weep /" (~ Robb Strgarm -I- ADW I Burg Res Burg Cocnm ~i, Burg Veh ~ Grand Theft ~ GTA Assault 'ESTACI; A Forgery Fraud Sex Felony (2) Sex Misd Narcotics ~X~,>~ ~,~ Alcohol Viol P' Drunk (::'_')Disord Cond :z:, ~ DUI :~: Vandalism ,~L Arson ~--- Receiving (~' .t) Theft 'i WP-Concealed EC Wp=Felony WP-Misd WP-Shooting Layers t Car Jackincj CITIES -- HIGHWAYS -- STREETS Miles Graffiti Misd i~-'--i "k Grafriti Felony .... j RD -- NSTRE · Dotepoint. o o.I 0.2 · Out. of Range -- FREEWAYS RAILROADS 1 Foothill and Archibald Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part ! Crime Count Homicide 0 Rape 0 Robb Weap 3 Robb Strgarm 3 ADW 4 Burglary Res 23 Burglary Com 17 Burglary Veh 22 Grand Theft 15 Auto Theft 19 Assault 21 TOTAL 127 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 9 Fraud 0 ..... Sex Felony 2 Sex Misd 1 Narcotics 8 Alcohol Viol 1. Drunk 12 Disord Cond 9 DUI 19 Vandalism 22 Arson 0 Receiving 2 Theft 40 TOTAL 125 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 0 Day of Week Count Monday 50 Tuesday 65 Wednesday 56 Thursday 71 Friday 66 Saturday 60 Sunday 55 TOTAL ~423 2 Foothill and Archibald Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 10 2 3 22 4 9 5 13 6 18 7 8 10 9 10 10 11 11 10 12 15 13 19 14 15 15 12 16 18 17 12 18 18 19 10 20 12 21 8 22 11 23 24 17 25 15 26 16 27 21 28 15 29 16 30 11 31 9 TOTAL 423 Month Count January 75 February 64 March 8 0 April 0 May June 0 July 0 August 0 September- 56 October 65 November 81 December 74 TOTAL 423 Foothill and Archibald Last 180 Days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department fear Count 1992 0 1993 0 1994 0 1995 276 1996 147 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 423 Time Block Count 0000-0059 20 0100-0159 16 0200-0259 5 0300-0359 7 0400-0459 6 0500-0559 3 0600-0659 10 0700-0759 9 "0800-0859 22 0900-0959 21 1000-1059 33 1100-1159 21. 1200-1259 17 13D0-1359 15 1400-1459 24 1500-1559 29 1600-1659 28 1700-1759 23 1800-1859 30 1900-1959 28 2000-2059 16 2100-2159 14 2200-2259 14 2300-2359 12 TOTAL 423 C rim e c,1 i>,sis D R's R ,:~ r l <: I'1,:> C I.~ c c~ r'n o r l 'U <:1 P oli c:: e D e f::' <:~ r' I: r ~'i e r/:[[~[ t,,t u rcle r .............................................................................. : ........................I, Rape- Robb Weap blONTI ~ Robb Strgarn'~ · !- ADW I Burg Res Burg Carom I ~ Burg Veh _-,-~ , Grand Theft, ~, GTA Assault ~' A Forgery Fraud Sex Felony <} Sex Misd Narcotics ,I ~,~ Alcohol Viol P' Drunk Disord Cond (~) DUI :X< Vandalism  ArSOA / BALSA Receiving ~<~ ~ t,i Theft /' _ V/P-Concealed WP-Felony WP-Misd WP-Shoo[ing Layers t Car JackinS CITIES -- HIGHWAYS -- STREETS Miles Graffiti Misd ~ "k Graffiti Felony L...j RD -- NSTRE · Datapoint, 0 o.i o.2 · OUt of Range -- FREEWAYS RAILROADS 1 Baseline / Archibald Last 180 days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 0 Rape 2 Robb Weap 6 Robb Strgarm 2 ADW 14 Burglary Res 15 Burglary Com 9 Burglary Veh 13 Grand Theft 9 Auto Theft 21 Assault 9 TOTAL 100 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 1 Fraud 1 'Sex Felony 2 Sex Misd 1 Narcotics 21 Alcohol Viol O- Drunk 5 Disord Cond 19 DUI 21 Vandalism 29 Arson 0 Receiving 2 Theft 28 TOTAL 130 Weapons Count Concealed 1 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 1 Day of Week Count Monday 44 Tuesday 51 Wednesday 52 Thursday 48 Friday 55 Saturday 63 Sunday 52 TOTAL 365 ~ 2 Baseline / Archibald Last 180 days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Month Count 1 8 2 12 3 11 4 22 5 13 6 9 7 8 8 4 9 7 10 16 11 7 12 15 13 11 14 13 15 7 16 16 17 14 18 12 19 11 · 20 17 21 11 22 13 23 10, 24 17 25 11 26 12 27 17 28 11 29 13 30 8 31 9 TOTAL 365 Month Count january 73 February 80 March 11 April 0 May 0 June O July 0 August 0 September 29 October 65 November 45 December 62 TOTAL 365 03/07/96 3 Baseline Archibald Last 180 days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Year Count 1992 0 1993 0 199~ 0 1995 201 1996 164 1997 0 1998 0 1999 0 TOTAL 365 Time Block Count 0000-0059 21 0100-0159 16 0200-0259 9 0300-0359 10 0400-0459 6 0500-0559 5 0600-0659 5 0700-0759 12 0800-085~' 19 0900-0959 19 1000-1059 12 1100-1159 20. 1200-1259 22 1300-1359 17 1400-1459 14 1500-1559 13 1600-1659 21 1700-1759 26 1800-1859 16 1900-1959 13 2000-2059 16 2100-2159 24 2200-2259 14 2300-2359 15 TOTAL 365 Crime Anol)xsis : DR's Rancho Cucamonga Police Depart. rnen.t ['_f_] Murder 'ij~ ,__ i ~_~r~ J~! Rape Robb Weep ORANGE .,~ (G Robb Strgorrn · 1- ADW I Burg Res Burg Carom ~ Burg Veh 'k- Grand Theft ~i, GTA I Assault GARDEi'-7: ~ I A Forgery  Fraud Sex Felony 0 Sex Misd ~ I, ~ Narcot. lcs z ~_.] Alcohol Viol '< P Drunk '~ JONQUIL ('T:) Disord Cond AVALON '8' DUI I; ~ :X: Vandalism -- ~ Arson Receiving ----__ MONT; _ Theft. I ' ~ WP-Concealed LA __ WP-Misd ' WP-ShooLing Layers t Car Jacking CITIES -- HIGHWAYS -- STREETS Miles GraffiLi Misd RD -- NSTRE · DoLopoinL 0 0., 0.2 ~ GrarfiLi Felony FREEWAYS RAILROADS · Out. of Range TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, Residing at TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, I am a resident of Rancho Cucamon~a. .tZ/ ~t Z~md~., ~_.q:~O/ "' $ ~ ~n~u r~ Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. NcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, I am a resident of Rancho Cucamon~a. Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. - ~ ' Sigrlature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COHHISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Le,non Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, Slgrlatuc~~ X/~/ · ~ ................ Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. HcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. \ Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing at/~/~D ~ ~ Z-/ Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 bemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Sign~/~ur~ Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. i Date TO: BANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Signature ~/~/~ ......... Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Dat~ / TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my st, pport of Jerry R. HcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Le.lon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamon~a. ~ OA~ ~7~- Sigr~ature/ ~ _~V -~ ~ vX" ....... Date TO: RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING COHMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamon~a, TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CONMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing at ~ IS ~,~d~ ~ Signattire Date TO: RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McOuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing at ~'~ 7 0 Fd_,//"dJ/L/ Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McG~.lirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 hemor~ Ave. Rancho Cucalnonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamon~a. Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McOuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. ,~esid~,,~ at {072-0 FO~'~i'i( 6/V.d-- v2, o q rT'~o Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca, S1 rlatu e Date 7 TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamon~a. Residing at ~/ 2-22 Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. 2esiding at ~/~ ~ ~/zZz~'~J Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing at ~ 6/~y ~ lgrl u - Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Signature / Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk an,:t his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Le,no~ Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. A I { I,s,,,~, 8,.. S / 2 01 TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Sig~/~irV_~' ~- ........ Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. aancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of t%ancho Cucamonga. lgrlature TO: RANGNO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamon~a. TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing at ~/~: _S~ T~n~/~RD//~D Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing at ALTA LOHA Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. ~ate TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of F~ancho Cucamon~a. Da e TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Sigrlature Da~ea~ , _ TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry' R. ~lcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, I am a resident of Rancho Cucamon~a. Residing at Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cuoamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga, Residing at 7-~d'-7 77~r_ ~Y~ Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing ~t ~170 Y'l~Fag-Z-/~Jd-- ~' t, Signature Date/ TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. TO: RANCHO CUCA~IONGA PLANNING CO~I~JISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10481 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of F~ancho Cucamonga. Residing at ~/~ 7~,A1B~J~ ,~Pf. 7, g/7~O Si~natur Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. NcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Date TO: RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing at i/d~ Signature Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing at ~ 7k} 7oFA'l- ~V SignStulle Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CO~I~IISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. ~lcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Sigr~ature Date TO: RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING COMHISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. NcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. ~1730 Signature %b. ~g I~qG DaLe TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, I am a resident of Rancho Cucamon~a, ~/A [~ ~ r_~ ~ ~ ~.~ TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. g~,. e d n S i~~ Date TO: RANCHO CUCA~IONGA PLANNING CO~I~IISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of [~ancho Cucamonga. .... . .,,./~ I. TO: RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING COHHISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. NcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. s g TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. HcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. at ~ . Date RECEIVED MAR 1 ! 1996 City Of Rancho Cucamonga TO: RANCHO CUCAHONGA PLANNTNG COHHTSSTON PlanningDivision This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. HcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of gancho Cucamonga, Residing at 96300 b'r'P b0m Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Sigr~"~"'~ ....... .:Z- 7. 5-=-YG ............. Date TO: RANCHO CUCA~IONGA PLANNING CO~IHISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. ~lcGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Sigrlature ~ ~-~.~ -~ ..... Date TO: RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION This letter is to voice my support of Jerry R. McGuirk and his efforts to establish a Tavern located at 10431 Lemon Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. I am a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Residing at /0/0 Date Inland Valley Man threatens to leave R.C. if tavern request denied Daily Bulletin 10431 Lemon Ave, activities such as pool and dal'Ls analyst Dan Wattors denied McGuirk, looked at cri~nes within Wattors ran new reparts Tues- McGuirk said he has been only by permit. McGuirk's charge Tuesday. a half-mile radius of the intersee- day so the tota]s within' the ~NCHO CUCAMONGA -- A treated unfairly in his quest for a McGuirk, 53, has proposed con- Wattors said any discrepancy tions during a 180-day period square area and cireular,.,aren [fical businessman trying to open tavern and plans to sell his book- vexing a former specialty market between numbers ~ven to the ending March 7, Wattors said. would be from the same ]80;d~y a tavern ,with pool tables and store and home, pack his bags to a tavern with a bar, a kitchen, Planning department on Feb. 28 In his research, Wattors cam- period ending March 11. ,,=' da~ boards said he's been sneak- and move to ~izona. 12 dining tables, four pool tables, and to one of McGuirk's employ- pared the crime near Lemon and Wattors said the S~¥ifFs ered by the police. The commission has scheduled two electronic da~ boards and a~ ees on March 7 was due to the Haven to two similar interscc- Department recommended"' Jen7 McGuirk, who has also a 7 p.m. public hearing tnday at office. use oF different area and time tions in the city - ~chibald Ave- deny McGuirk's applicat. i~h owned the Book Trader in the 10500 Civic Center Drive to His main complaint is that he parameters ~ analyze the city's hue and 19th Street and Base because his~ricnlly crime' city for more than fm~r years, is review McGuirk's application for believes the SherifFs Department crime. Line Road and Haven. increased around businesses ,that upset officials with th+ city Plan- a conditional use permit. falsified crime statistic repo~s ~ The repo~ for the Planning Wattors said he chose to cem- sere alcohol and Lemo~: nlng Depal%ment and San Bcr- City Planner Brad Bul]er said show that the area surrounding Department studied crimes pare those two intersections Haven already has a high,crime. fardine County Sheri~s Depart- Chaffey Plaza, where McGuirk the intersection of I~mon and within a one-~le-square area because ,they nil had a mix of ra~ .... ..'. menthnverecommended that the has signed a lease, is zoned Haven avenues has a high hum- during a 180-day period ending commercial retail, apaz%ments, McGuirk still questioned"t]~ Planning Commission deny his neighborhood commercial, which bet of crimes ropeRed. Feb. 26. ~e report reques~d by single family residences and validity of the crime statistics, I year old dies in car crash argume Threealso injured o,co~.o.~. ~.~.~ ~.~, .~o,.as.~ ~o ~.~ .... :~ ~ begin i~ two-car collision ~o,..~..~a, ~n~,..~a ,.,o o,co.~o.. ~,~ ?~,..~ crashed head-on with a white speed li~: have been Closing arguments are Glendora Police Chief Paul death Tues- cal Center in killing an off-duty police officer Louis Pompei's murder trial. ties after her swerved into the He was also taken to San Ber- ~~::~ ~, ~s:: nardino County Medical ~enter ~. Attorneys fbr both sides on officer who was in good physi- ~Lhough Moni The Illsion was condition. Tuesday rested their cases in cal shape and was a friend ~o placed in a , the reported ~bout no~h The driver d the van, 56- fl~ere a~er sugaring serei'd.fACial Ramirez, 18, and Lar~ Her- depa~ment. Buick Sent~ the ~rl of Walnut Village year-old Aleso Ikahihi/o of On~ar* cuts, O'Connor said. Neither he nandez, 17, who are hath He added that the officer Monique died at 11:26 ' , was going ~ visit someone at nor his 33-year-old n'~ew, believed Lohe ~nmen in tim wore a heard g in wi~h her father, San Bernardino County Linda University Medical Kalikubo Ikahihi[o, wo~q killing of 30-year-aid Glendora involvement in their n Jerame Russell, police S~. Tim Center after suffering severe ended up s~aying he]~, police said. Chaffey'adult classes offered Attorneys For the defense cover. also a ~a.'~ ~., ~.~ ~.~ or ~,~ ~"~ ,~- LEGION POST 75 their own after prosecutors enforcement task Daily Bulletin ~xcel. wrapped-up their final alPACT. A WordPerfect 6.1 class will be testimony. Ramire~ Ramirez and Hernandez are ONTARIO -- The Chaffey offered at Ontario High School. nandez chose not charged with first-degree tour- Ad~L School is accepting applied- Classes he~n April 8. tier and assault with a deadly tions for typing, computer and Registration tar classes is art W. A~ nag rend the June 9 shootout in a San Courses offered at Altn L<nnn School, 211 W. Fifth St.,Ontarie. jury t.]~eir instructions for 1)tams gs'occl~ store that left High School are beginning key- Some classes may require a ~ 5DAYSA WEEK deliberation early so that Pompci dcad. The officer foiled ~ ..... ,: ......... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF RF, PORT DATE: March 13, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-02 - JERRY R. MCGUIRK - A request to establish a bar with on-site consumption of beer and wine, with incidental food service, and with 4 pool tables and 2 dart game devices in a leased space of 3,168 square feet in an existing commercial center in the Neighborhood Commercial District at 10431 Lemon Avenue, Unit N * APN: 201-262-46, 47 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: The applicant is requesting the approval of a Conditional Use Permit to establish a bar with on-site consumption of beer and wine, with food service, and with four pool tables and two dart game devices. The Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for a bar and for indoor recreation facilities such as pool tables and dart games in the Neighborhood Commercial District. The Conditional Use Permit process is intended to afford an opportunity for broad public review and evaluation of the bar's operation to mitigate potentially adverse impacts. - This item was advertised in the public hearing notices as a "bar" for two reasons. Firstly, the initial application did not provide sufficient justification that the intended use was a restaurant. The applicanrs description of the project contained only a vague reference to "hot and cold sandwiches and side dishes" (see Exhibit "A"). Secondly, the floor plan indicates a bar of substantial proportions measuring 44 linear feet. Subsequently, the applicant has provided a copy of their intended menu which specifically lists a limited variety of burgers, hot dogs. meat and cheese sandwiches, and a variety of side dishes (see Exhibit "A-2"). SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The proposed location is within the "Chaffey Plaza" shopping center located at the southwest corner of Haven and Lemon Avenues. The proposed use would occupy the space closest to Lemon Avenue, which was previously occupied by a specialty market. The shopping center contains a variety of commercial and retail establishments. The closest tenants are a florist, hair salon, and restaurant. Approximately one-half of the leasable space within the shopping center is vacant. The site is surrounded to the north, south, and west by single and multi- family dwellings and to the east by commercial development (see Exhibit "B"). There is a 1.29 acre vacant parcel immediately to the west. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 96-02 - JERRY R. MCGUIRK March 13, 1996 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed establishment will occupy 3,168 square feet of floor area and will include a bar, kitchen, 12 dining tables, 4 pool tables, 2 electronic dart game devices, and an office. The proposed hours of operation are 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. Sunday through Thursday and 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The applicant intends to expand the business activity depending upon its success. An increase in the number of pool tables/dart games and/or adding the service of distilled spirits would require a new public hearing to modify this Conditional Use Permit. The applicant has stated that the proposed use, J & B's Sandwich Shop & Tavern, is a restaurant with beer and wine. The menu will consist of hot and cold sandwiches and side dishes (e.g., french fries, chili, etc.). Taverns are only allowed within this zone when conducted as an accessory use to a restaurant. The large size of the proposed bar, 44 linear feet, indicates that a substantial percentage of the businesses income will be derived from on-site sales of beer and wine. In comparison, Applebees Neighborhood Grill and Bar has the same size bar to support almost three times as many dining seats. Therefore, staff believes the tavern aspect exceeds that which could be considered as accessory. B. Land Use Compatibility: Bars and taverns located in neighborhood shopping centers require a Conditional Use Permit because of their unique operating characteristics. which differ from general retail establishments, and require special consideration in order to operate in a manner compatible with surrounding uses. These distinguishing characteristics include the on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages, late hours, music, and sometimes entertainment. The Commission is well aware of concerns raised by residents regarding other bars located within neighborhood shopping centers, despite limitations imposed by the City. Police records have shown that bars generate a significantly higher number of calls for service than general retail for a variety of problems, ranging from petty theft to assault with a deadly weapon. C. Public Health. Safety or General Welfare: The Police Department analyzed the calls for service near the intersection of Lemon and Haven Avenues in comparison to two other intersections with neighborhood commercial shopping centers (Base Line Road and Haven Avenue, and Archibald Avenue and 19th Street). Calls for service were reported within a half- mile radius of the study intersections. The study concluded twice as many calls for service near the Lemon and Haven Avenues intersection (see Exhibit "G"). The Police Department recommended denial because the on-site consumption of alcohol would exacerbate the current law enforcement problem in the immediate area. State Alcoholic and Beverage Control regulations require the state to "deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if the issuance would result in or add to an undue concentration of licenses." An "undue concentration" means the applicant premises are located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department study findings indicate that calls for service for the reporting area near the intersection of Lemon and Haven Avenues are 97 percent greater than the other two reporting areas studied. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 96-02 - JERRY R. MCGUIRK March 13, 1996 Page 3 D. Parkinc~ Calculations: The Development Code requires 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area for shopping centers larger than 25,000 square feet. The subject proposal lies within a shopping center that will have 25,172 square feet of gross leasable area. Therefore, the total number of parking spaces required for the center is 113 spaces (4.5 by 25,172). The site currently has 134 parking spaces which is well in excess of the required spaces. FINDINGS: The Planning Commission must consider the possible adverse impact of the proposed bar on the neighboring businesses and residents. The Commission must make five findings to approve this Conditional Use Permit. The findings that staff believes would be difficutt to make are that the use would not have an adverse effect on adjacent property, and that the use would not endanger or otherwise be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within an expanded notification area beyond the usual 300 feet (see Exhibit "H"). Correspondence received is attached as Exhibit "F." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission deny Conditional Use Permit 96-02 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Denial. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:BL:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Description Exhibit "B" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan Exhibit "E" - Information Sheet Exhibit "F" - Correspondence Exhibit "G" - Police Report on Calls For Service Exhibit "H" - Notification Area Map Resolution of Denial PROJECT DESCRIPTION This operation will primarily be a sandwich shop/restaurant, At first we will concentrate on hot and cold sandwiches and side dishes, i.e., French fries, chili, etc., our dirnks will include soft drinks, tea, coffee, beer and wine. We Plan to start operation with 13 tables for set down dining (also food take out upon request). Depending on the success of the business we plan to expand our menu to include full course meals, i.e., breakfast lunch and dinner. To start operation we will feature 4 pool tables and 2 electronic dart games. This also will be expanded as the business grows. Our business hours, at this time, are expected to be 11 AM to 12 midnight Sunday thru Thursday, with a closing time of 2 AM Friday and Saturday. With our planned expansion our business hours will be extended to include the breakfast hours. We plan to start with 3 employees, as the business growth permits, we plan to have up to 10 employees. Our current business is "Book Trader"' in Rancho Cucamonga. At Book Trader we have 3 employees with the plans to employee 1 to 2 more by the end of 1996. 2-28-1996 6:~8Pf,1 FROf,I BOOK TRADER 989 ~8,Z t1©5 P. 2 RECEIVED FEB 2 8 1996 city of Rancho Cucamonga HOT SANDWICH COLD SANDWICH Mam Hamburger Salami Cheeseburger Cheese !Sour Dough Burger Turkey Grilled Cheese Beef Hot Dog 3hi!i Dog ;hi!i/Cheese Dog ;hili Size For Cheese add SIDE ORDERS DRINKS French Fries Soft Drinks Chili Fries Sprite, Coke, Pepsi, Chili Dr. Pepper, 7-up, Nachos Chili Cheese Fries Coffee '- Tea (hot/cold) Beer Bottle Tap Wine (glass) PLANNING DIVISION: Item #4 - See Attachment #1 POLICE DEPARTMENT: (A1 Pool tables will not be separated as shown in Floor layout. (BI Per conversation with A.B.C. no one under the age of 21 will be allowed on the permeances until we go to full service Which we do plan to do as described in Project Description. '(CI Upon opening currant plans are to have 3 employees per shift, One (1) Bartender, One (1) Cook, and myself as owner/manager. Employees will perform all duties as assigned by owner. The total number of employees to start is expected to be four (4) plus myself. @ ® ©  C__., 7Project: d4~P~(,p-Of-- C~TY OF R -f.j AM Title:'qV',~K\t'F-f' HAP' PLA I~O~N ONGA · . t ~_____,LZj Exhibit: '1~ Date: INFORMATION SHEET CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE NO: CUP 96-02 PROJECT NAME: Conditional Use Permit 96-02 APPLICANT: Jerry McGuirk LOCATION: 10431 Lemon Avenue, Unit N (southwest comer Lemon and Haven Avenues) FLOOR AREA: 3, 168 sq.fi. lease space within 25, 172 sq. ft. commercial center LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: Bar with ancillary billiards EXISTING ZONING: Neighborhood Commercial EXISTING LAND USE: Commercial Center GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Commercial ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: ZONING LAND USE. NOrth: Medium Density Multi-family dwellings Residential South: Low-Medium Residential condominiums Density Residential East: Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood shopping center (Haven Village) West: Low Density Single-family dwellings Residential SITE DESCRIPTION: The site is developed with a 21,896 square foot commercial center which will contain 25, 172 square feet upon build out (there is a pad for a planned 3,276 square foot building). Of the 21,896 square feet of existing space, 7,300 square feet is occupied by retail establishments, 2,000 square feet is occupied by restaurants, 1,500 square feet is occupied by a hair salon, and 11,096 square feet is vacant. SITE SIZE: 2.5 acres PARKING CALCULATIONS: The Development Code requires 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area for shopping centers larger than 25,000 square feet. The subject proposal lies within a shopping center that will have 25,172 square feet of gross leasable area. Therefore, the total number of parking spaces required for the center is 113 spaces (4.5 by 25,172). The site has 134 parking spaces which ex~.ceeds the required spaces. Woodhaven Manor ~ECEIVED January 3], 1996 FEB'06 1996 Cabtin Rbnald Bieberdorf C~y o{ Rancho Cu~m0nga 10510 Civic Center DR. Plann~g DW~aofl 'Rancho Cucamonga, Calif 91730 Dear Mr. Bieberdorf: ' This memo is to inform you that they are t~inking about opening a Bar across the street from this appartment complex which is located at 6230 Haven. The location where this is to take place is'located at ]043' Lemon. I. am the Manager here at Wood Haven Manor Appartments.. I think this.w6uld be a very bad ideal. This is an Low income appartment complex and if this bar is so close to us it will attract people over there. We have over 400 children here and I.m afraid that some one leaving the Bar-coUld be intoxicated and something bad could happen. So on behalf of all the Parents and,,ch'ildren here please help us to keep this TAb from. opening'.~ Your cooperation con6erning this matter will be appreciated Sincerly Manager /' % \/ 6230 Haven Avenue. Alta Loma CA 91737. 909 980-3]06 FAX (909i 944-5524 02/26/96 1 Lemon & Haven last 180 days Rancho Cucamonga Police Department ~ Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 0 Rape 1 Robb Weap 3 8 ~ O E ~ V E O Robb Strgarm 3 ADW 9 Burglary Res 33 FEB ~8 ~886 Burglary Com 5 Burglary Veh 40 Grand Theft 15 Oi~yofRancho Oucam0~Ga Auto Theft 40 eaanning D~is~n Assault 19 TOTAL 168 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 4 Fraud 1 Sex Felony 2 Sex Misd 2 Narcotics 6 Alcohol Viol 2 Drunk 2 Disord Cond 15 DUI 15 VandaliSm 35 Arson 2 Receiving 0 Theft 31 TOTAL 117 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 3 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 3 Day of week Count Monday 62 Tuesday 50 Wednesday 52 Thursday 81 Friday 64 Saturday 77 Sunday 57 Baseline and Haven Last 180 days from 02/26/96 R [ C [ ~ V E D Part 1 Crime count F[8 2 8 1996 Homicide 1 Rape 0 Robb Weap 1 CityolRanCho Cucamonga Robb Strgarm 0 Planning Division ADW 7 Burglary Res 22 B~rglary Com 4 Burglary Veh 11 Grand Theft 9 Auto Theft 12 Assault 9 TOTAL 76 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 1 Fraud 0 Sex Felony 3 Sex Misd 3 Narcotics 3 Alcohol Viol 0 Drunk 1 Disord Cond 6 DUI 4 Vandalism 16 Arson 0 Receiving 1 Theft 29 TOTAL 67 Weapons Count Concealed 0 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shoo.ring 0 TOTAL 0 Day of Week Count Monday 29 Tuesday 33 wednesday 39 Thursday 36 Friday 39 Saturday 28 Sunday 31 ToT~ 235 Last 180 Days from 02/26/96 Archibald and 19th R [ O [ ~ V [ Part 1 Crime Count Homicide 1 Rape 0 Robb Weap 3 City 01 Ranch0 Cucamonga Robb Strgarm 2 Planning Division ADW 12 Burglary Res 12 Burglary Com 4 Burglary Veh 13 Grand Theft 6 Auto Theft 15 Assault 7 TOTAL 75 Part 2 Crime Count Forgery 2 Fraud 1 Sex Felony 1 Sex Misd 0 Narcotics 7 Alcohol Viol 3 Drunk 1 Disord Cond 10 DUI 10 Vandalism 36 Arson 1 Receiving 2 Theft 10 TOTAL 64 Weapons Count Concealed 1 Felony 0 Misd 0 Shooting 0 TOTAL 1 Day of Week Count Monday 34 Tuesday 30 Wednesday 22 Thursday 32 Friday 32 Saturday 28 .~ Sunday 37 TOTAL 215 pOC~~o~ C, }:~' Project: c.,,J~ CITY ONGA Title: ~Fl~o~ ~ Exhibit: ~ Date: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96--02 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A BAR WITH ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF BEER AND WINE, WITH INCIDENTAL FOOD SERVICE, AND WITH FOUR POOL TABLES AND TWO DART GAMES, LOCATED IN.THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-262-46 AND 47. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, Jen'y McGuirk has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 96-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of March 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have ~ccurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on March 13th, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The appIicetion applies to property located at the southwest corner of Lemon and Haven Avenues on property zoned Neighborhood Commercial and is currently developed with a shopping center, including an automotive service station with mini-market, and a convenience market; b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with multi-family and single family dwellings, the property to the south consists of residential condominiums, the property to the east is developed with a neighborhood shoppin9 center (Haven Village), the adjoining property to the west is vacant, and the property approximately 200 feet to the west is developed with single family dwellings; c. The application contemplates the operation of a tavern within a 3,168 square foot leased space, including a bar serving beer and wine, 12 dining tables, 4 pool tables, and 2 electronic dad game devices. The proposed hours of operation are 11:00 a.m. to 12 a.m. Sunday through Thursday, and 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday; d. The applicent's floor plan indicates a bar measuring 44 linear feet, a size typical of restaurants that have up to three times as much dining room seating as that proposed by the applicant, which indicates that a substantial portion of the gross sales will be derived from sales of beer and wine for on-site consumption. Such bar use as contemplated is conditionally permitted within the Neighborhood Commercial district only where accessory to a primary restaurant use; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 96°02 - JERRY MCGUIRK March 13, 1996 Page 2 e. The application states that food service will be limited to a menu of several burgers, hot dogs, meat sandwiches, and side dishes, which is incidental; f. Notwithstanding the prohibitions contained in Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Table 17.10.030.B, the application as proposed, would be materially, detrimental to the persons and properties in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site for the following reasons: (i) The size of bar proposed, together with limited food service, is inconsistent with the Neighborhood Commercial prohibition concerning bars and taverns operated as a primary use; (ii) The intersection of Lemon and Haven Avenues has experienced calls for service over the previous six months, including violent crimes, 97 percent greater than similar reporting areas according to documents submitted by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for an area within a half-mile radius of the intersection. The proposed on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages, in coniunction with present volume of calls for service, and the nature of crimes being investigated, would exacerbate the current law enforcement problem in the area; (iii) The proposed on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages, in conjunction with present volume of calls for service, and the nature of cdmes being investigated, would result in or add to an undue concentration of licenses as defined by California Business & Professions Code Sections 23958 and 23958.4. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 96-02-JERRY MCGUIRK March 13, 1996 Page 3 BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATI'EST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Bred Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certifij that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~ ~' 2/13~96 To whom it may concern, I am ve~ much in favor of the proposed project to build 30 SF detached homes on Terra Vista Pkwy, west of Belpine. The our community stands a better chance of maintaining the good quality of our neighborhood with the addition of single-family homes vs. aparth~nt complexes. I feel that people who own their property have mere appreci;~tion fo~' their neighborhood since bhey have some stake in the future of their neighborhood when they decide to sell their home. That is not to say the renters do not care about their community - that is not true.-Renters can show the same appreciation and respect for their community. Another issue I would like to raise with the Planning Department is that of the intersection of Milliken and Terra Vista Parkway. Recently, I spoke to a gentleman in the Planning Department regarding th~ danger of crossing this intersectjon - and the desperate need for a traffic signal. I was told that a traffic signal was part ofthe 'master plan' for Terra Vista. Well, I have been a homeowner in Terra Vista for over four years and have yet to see the fulfillment of this aspect of our 'master plan'. However, what I have seen iS a number of traffic accidents at this specific location. I don't know if it will take one of our neighborhood children being hit while trying to cross (on foot), or a fatal traffic accident. but I think it would be in the sity's best interest to * install a traffic light at this intersection as soon as pessibte. In additjon to it being almost impossible to cross' Milliken at 5pro, the slope of Milliken miakes it even mere difficult to detect northbound traffic. - My final concern for our 'master plan' in Terra Vista is 'Central Park'. This sign has also been posted for over four years. I have yet to see any type of development on this lot (on the north side of Baseline between Milliken and Valencia. When does the city (or Lewis Homes) plan to.develop this piece of property? I have also raised this issue with the Planning Depadment; but was referred to Lewis Homes. I did not receive a satisfactory answer fi'om either the city or Lewis Homes. Thank you, in advance for attention to these matters. 'ncere , R E C E I V E D Calais Tract F E B 4 1996 Joyce Medeiros Bowers 7577 Belpine Place City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamenga, CA 91730 Planning Division CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF RF, PORT DATE: March 13, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-33 - HILL PINKERT ARCHITECTS - A request to construct two industrial buildings totaling 471,625 square feet on 23.08 acres of land in the General Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located south of Arrow Route and east of White Oak Avenue - APN: 209-471-08. Related File: Modification to Development Review 91-08. MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 91-08 CAPELLINO & ASSOCIATES - A request to. modify the approved Master Plan to allow the construction of two industrial buildings totaling 471,625 square feet on 23.08 acres of land in the General Industrial designation (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located south of Arrow Route and east of White Oak Avenue - APN: 209-471-08. Related File: Development Review 95-33. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonina: Noah Industrial building; Industrial Area Specific Plan, General Industrial (Subarea 8) South - Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan, General Industrial (Subarea 8) East Industrial building; Industrial Area Specific Plan, General Industrial (Subarea 8) West Industrial buildings; Industrial Area Specific Plan, General Industrial (Subarea 8) B. General Plan Desianations: Project Site - General Industrial Noah - General Industrial South - General Industrial East General Industrial West General Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with an average slope of 2 percent from noah to south. Tacoma Drive, Oakwood Place, and Arrow Route are fully improved across the propeay frontages. ITEMS D & E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 95-33 HILL PINKERT ARCHITECTS DR 91-08 - CAPELLINO & ASSOCIATES March 13, 1996 Page 2 D. Parkina Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Reauired Provided Building No. 1: Office 6,250 1 space/250 sq. ft. 25 25 Warehouse 20,000 I space/1,000 sq. ~. 20 20 20,000 I space/2,000 sq. ft. 10 10 161.210 I space/4,000 sq. ~. 4_0.0 40 Total 207,460 95 95 Truck Trailer 1 spaCe/dock door 30 59 Building No. 2: Office 8,000 I space/250 sq. ft. 32 32 Warehouse 20,000 I space/1,000 sq. ft. 20 20 20,000 1 space/2,000 sq. ~. 10 10 216,165 I space/4,000 sq. ~. 54 54 Total 264,165 116 116 Truck Trailer 1 space/dock door 42 44 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop two warehouse/distribution buildings totaling 471,625 square feet. Building No. 1, located along Tacoma Ddve, is designed with dock-high doors on the north side of the building. The building is set back from the rear property line to allow potential rail service in the future - the rail spur geometry has been accounted for in the building location. Building No. 2 is designed with rail service from the east side of the building and dock-high doors on the west side. The buildings are designed with bdck veneer, sandblasted concrete elements, fluted concrete elements, green glazing, and painted concrete panels. The building designs include a vertical tower element at locations along the building to break up the horizontal line of the buildings. Design emphasis is placed at the building entries and at potential building entries. B. Master Plan Modification: In 1992, the Planning Commission approved the Master Plan for the site. The original plan provided for the development of 31 smaller buildings (see Exhibit "D"). The buildings range in size from 9,931 square feet to 97,543 square feet. To date, seven buildings have been completed within the development and are occupied. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 95-33 HILL PINKERT ARCHITECTS DR 91-08 - CAPELLINO & ASSOCIATES March 13, 1996 Page 3 The area proposed with this application originally contained 13 smaller buildings. Two buildings along the southern portion of the site were planned to be rail served. The buildings along Arrow Route were designed as multi-tenant suites. The balance of the buildings were designed as smaller (+20,000 square feet) manufacturing buildings. A cul-de-sac was provided to gain access to the buildings from Tacoma Drive. The applicant has designed the project to locate loading areas off the major street (Arrow Route) and provide additional architectural enhancements along the Special Boulevard frontage (Arrow Route). The parking along Arrow Route is consistent with the original Master Plan. To minimize the building height with the warehouse buildings, the applicant is sloping the site down from Arrow Route, resulting in a building pad 6 feet below the curb grade. While the buildings are in sharp contrast to the smaller industrial buildings originally conceived, the application is consistent with the General Industrial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Also, the application is consistent with other buildings in the area. With development of the remaining smaller buildings along Arrow Route, the larger warehouse buildings, especially Building No. 1, will be obscured from Arrow Route. Staff finds the revisions to the Master Plan acceptable. C. Desian Review Committee: On January 16, 1996, the Design Review Committee (Lumpp, Henderson) reviewed the application and recommended the following revisions: 1. Additional brick and sandblasting should be provided at the office areas. 2. The vertical accent elements at the office areas should receive additional architectural treatment to include change of texture, change of material, or fluting. 3. The nodh elevation of Building No. 2 should be revised to eliminate the center vertical elements, shifting the easterly vertical element to the building corner, and the addition of glass and brick at the nodheast corner of the building. 4. Additional architectural treatment should be provided at the nodhwest corner of Building No. 1 to include elements consistent with the office area at the northeast corner of the building. 5. The screen wall should receive a horizontal sandblasted band and the planters should be sandblasted. The applicant revised the plans and resubmitted them for review. The plans incorporated many of the items requested by the Design Review Committee including: 1. Additional brick is provided at the second floor level of the office areas. 2. Two horizontal sandblast bands are provided at the office areas. 3. The horizontal elements at the office areas are designed with vertical fluted, sandblasted concrete, sandblasted sections, and painted accent squares. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 95-33 HILL PINKERT ARCHITECTS DR 91-08 - CAPELLINO & ASSOCIATES March 13, 1996 Page 4 4. Building No. 2's north elevation provides a tower element at the northeastern portion of the building with horizontal sandblasted bands between the tower and the building corner. 5. Building No. l's northeast corner provides vertical brick elements and horizontal sandblasted bands. Knock-out panels are provided to facilitate conversion to glass if the area is used as an office. 6. The screen wall design includes a horizontal sandblasted band and sandblasted planters. The Design Review Committee (Lumpp, Henderson) reviewed the changes on Februar~ 5, 1996. The Committee recommended approval of the application subject to glazing being provided at the northeast corner of Building No. 2 and the screen wall receiving a sandblast treatment at the vertical elements adjacent to the lower wall portions. D. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Environmental Checklist for the project, staff identified that the previous project was required to provide on-site detention facilities to handle storm water run-off. This project is proposing to relocate those facilities and submitted a hydrology report to the City for review. The report identified the size and location of the new detention facilities. This report was approved by the City and the applicant will be required to install improvements consistent with the report and as indicated on the Grading Plan. Therefore, the impact has been reduced to a level not considered significant. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 95-33 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. City Planner BB:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Plan Exhibit "B" Site/Grading Plan Exhibit "C" Building Elevations Exhibit "D" Original Master Plan Exhibit "E" Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Development Review 95-33 · '- Resolution of Approval for Modification to Development Review 91-08 0.39 0 0.39 0.78 Miles vicinity map project information .,..,...,..., .................................; tabulalions ................ '"' f t ,~*,::, ~ ...... ' ........""*'"~" * ...................... ' ..... ~ ~ r ... :~:,,, ~ ~ ..... ' "~"~"~"1" =lrl,,r =1 r ;~.~. ;'~ ...=. I site plan keynotes she plan general notes site Koll Arrow Center conceptual site plan ~ ' I ~-- hill pinckert architects, inc. ........ . .......................... .,....,..,,...~ . . z ..... ! . ~ : ~ i"'.,, I ~ ! o ...i '~.'..~- <j .....:.>>,,:.~.><.:.,~.! '~":'~I'I''''>"<~'i '~ KoII Arrow Center Building I hill pinckert erchifects, inc. I ': ......~ ZZ :, [ ................... "I .'. I ......F .....i''~i~ ~ "' ..... I ................................ ' '" i '<'>%" " " 4.::,,:-1.'...., ] I ............... ~ -- I .......... ' :'..::::::ZL:::'" :::::::;'::::.': ..... ] ............................ 21 ' :. ' I." '.1 .'7%: ' .................................... ""' e' ' ................. """' ....'r"' :<~""""" ""~<':";"' .....'~~":" ...... 17'7iiT"ii"! a~ i.', ,-<.,,..,-:--, .,..,..,..,..,...,. Koil ,~rrow Ca~ter Building I .. hill plnckert architects, Inc, Koll Arrow Center Building 1 hill plnckert archltects,.,'lnc. : I i i~ii"ll-~ii~ ~i ~' !i~" I · I i i -- ' , ......................."'~ .T :_~;"i" ' ." i' '~ !1 i I I'1 i i Koll Arrow Center Building I hill pinckert architects, inc. ~ -<),1 ; .:,., 11 I ~1 I ' I I o ....... GENERAL NOTE$, ELEVATIONS I " i ........ "! ............. ~ ........ I ....... { ] .... [ ....... t ........ I "~ I · .............................. ,..,~ ?l; ,!!o.( · ) Koll Arrow Center Building 1 hill pinckerl architects, inc. ............................................................................ t~ ,~?,( ~ ~ ....... ,,;;, , .............~.~ .~ -'.' ,..,.... ,.~ ...........'.. ;':'....~. ,... ,... :.._.,....>..,....'.,~ .. ;.~. ,...,,... .............; .... Ko~ Arrow Center Building 2 ......................................... hilt plnckert architects, inc. .: _: L _L '_, ..Z' '_Z,L ZZ _" "Z_ .Z" _ZZ ~ Z ZL ' q t" ' Z ~ ~ Koll Arrow Center .'1 Bufidlng 2 .......................................................... hlfi plnckert architects, Inc. ....... --~ GENERAL NOTES , ELEVA TJON$ ,: ~ l'; i7 ., .[.i~ '-l-:.....::::::::: ~ ~ *"'" " l '~ ~' I~ ' ~ 1 ......[~ ...... -~_~~.~ ' " Z Z ZIZ I '? .................. ~ ...........................- ............ I"~ :... ...... ...~ ....... ~ .,, ;: .,. ~ ...... ., ~ .......... ~ I .................... Kofi Arrow Center hill plnckert architects, inc. Building 2 .................. , ............. ........ E F G' Kofi Arrow Center Building 2 ...... . ~ hill plnckert architects,'jnc. ......................... EAST SCREEN WALL ELEVATION "1-- - I Koll Arrow Center ................................................................... ~S~~ ~L~_~ T~ .................. ,, Building ~ hill plnckert architecls, Inc. ENVIRONIV"' NTAL INFORMATION FORM The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, ordinances, and guidelines~ the California Environmental Quality Act~ and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESS[Fh Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of sttbmittall City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. ~ INFORMATION APplication N.mher ~or the project to which this form pertains: t~roject Title: /~ Name & Address of project o~ner(s): ~- , .~_ Name & Address of developer or ~roject sponsor; · Contact Person & Address: /~/~/C ~/~x~/~, ~/////'~ ~/'/~Io ¢ Telephone N-mhe_r.. Name & Address of person ~regaring ~is fo~ (if ~fferent fr~ ~ve) C I T Y o f R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION Information indicated by asterisk ( * ) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 X 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set Of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the' site from the primary access points which serve the si~e; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project LOcation (describe): 4} Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: 9 ) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainag~ courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures On site (including' age and condition ) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of information ( i · e · , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): D~scribe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) end how they will affect proposed uses: 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use which will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion 'of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Voice: 1714) 863-1770 Fax: (714i 863-0851 December 11, 1995 City ofKancho Cucamonga Community Development Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Dear Planner, In reference to the Koll Arrow Center located in the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, adjacent to Arrow Route, ~-onting Oakwood Place and Tacoma Drive are two concrete tilt-up Industfial Warehouse Facilities. Each building having a clear height of30' with a structural grid of 52' bays and both being rail served. Building 1, fronting Tacoma Drive has a net site area of 443,205 s.f. (10.17 acres) and a total building area of 207,460 s.f. The building consists of 1,500 s.f. ofofflce and 1,500 s.f. of future office, allowing for the remaining 204,460 s.f. to be dedicated to warehouse. The floor plan provides (53) dock nigh truck doors, (1) 12' x 14' drive-in door, and (1) trash compactor. The vernacular expressed represents the structural system and accentuates tilt-up panels, with accent reveals and blue reflective glazing adding color and texture to the building. The sur- rounding site is designed with sensitivity, providing lush landscaping and shade trees for the 157 stalls throughout the site. Building 2, fronting Oahvood Place has a net site area of 562,168 s.f. (12.91 acres) and a total building area of 264,165 s.f. The building consists of 8,040 s.f. of office, allowing for the remaining 256,125 s.f. to be dedicated to warehouse. The floor plan provides (45) dock high doors, (1) 12' x 14' drive-in door, and (1) trash compactor. The vernacular expressed represents the structural system and accentuates the tilt-up panels, with nigher masses located at the office area and trucking area to create rhythm and dynamic throughout the building. Color is expressed through accent reveals and blue reflective glass maintaining continuity be- tween both buildings. The surrounding site is again designed with sensitivity, providing lush landscaping and shade trees for the 116 stalls and 44 truck stalls throughout the site. Both buildings will be a contribution to the City ofRancho Cucamonga and will bring to the community a standard of excellence and consistency. Sincerely, Yong H. Nam hill pinckert architects, inc. Irvine, California 927_14 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc. ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc. ) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? 15) Indicate the type of short-term &nd long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount~ How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of sound proofing are proposed? * 16 ) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. .- a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/day) h. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) _Z/~r~ Peak use (gal/min/ac) 3'F~&/~w/J 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank ~ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (see Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) b. Industrial/Commercial (gal/day/ac) 2~a ~ o ~/~,~/~ ~ RESIDENTIAL P~DJ~CTS 20) N"mher of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 27) Anticipated. range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify Dumher Of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected num}~er of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as Shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High: 25) Describe ty!~e of use(s) and major function(s) of com-~rcial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of co~-~rcial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire 'for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air Pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): ~3, PROJgCTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proPosed project? If so, please indicate their response. D-K 7 33) In the known history of this Property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB ' s; radioactive substances; Pesticides and herbicides; fuel, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also, note underground storage Of any Of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. 34 ) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in 'the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be sub~/tted before an adeql/ate evaluatiun can be made by the City of ~ancho Cucamonga. Date: l~dd /2 ~?J" Signature: Title:_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NNVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ITIAL STUDY - PART II BACKGROUND 1) Project File #/Name: 2) Related File(s): 3) Applicant: ,,~zz: Address: /~ ~2, ~? Telephone #: 4) Project Description: 5) Project Accepted as Complete (date): /',/,'~,/~/~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS !ursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, explanation of the potential impacts identified as "Yes" or "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheets. An explanation shall also be provided in each instance where a potentially significant effect has been determined not to be significant and is marked "No." Yes Maybe No I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstableearthconditionsorinchangesinthegeologicstructure? 13 13 b) Disruptions, displacement, compaction or over covering of the soil? E(' O O c) Change in the topography or ground surface relief features? E( Q Q d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Q Q e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? 13 13 f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sand, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream orthe bed of the ocean or any bay, inletorlake? 13 Q g) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ,.E) -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Yes Maybe No II. AIR. Wi~ the proposal result in: a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?QQ b) The creation of objectionable odors? Q Q c) Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Q Q III. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changesincurrents, orthecourseofdirectionofwatermovements, in either marine or fresh waters? Q Q b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? get/ El Q c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Q Q d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any body? [] [] e) Discharge into surface waters;-or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? [] [] f) Alteration of the direction or rate of ground waters? [] [] El/' g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? [] h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? [] [] El/' i) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal pools? [] [] IV. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?[][] b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? [] Q c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? El Q d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? El El V. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals (birds; land animals, including reptiles;fish and shellfish; benthic organisms or insects)? [] Q b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species or animals? :E:::)' ~ ~,~ Q Q CITY OF RANCH O CUCAMONGA Yes Maybe No c) Introduction of new species of animals into the area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Q Q d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? VI. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? ~ El Q b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Q Q VII. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal: a) Produce new light and glare? C~" El VIII. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in: a) Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? IX. NATURAL RESOURCES. Wifl the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Q O Ca/'' X. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a) A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limitedto: oil, pesticicles, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Q ' Q b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Q Q XI. POPULATION. Will the proposal: a) Alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? Q Q XII. HOUSING. Will the proposal: / a) Affectexistinghousing,orcreateademandforadditionalhousing? Q g XIII. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Wifl the proposal result in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? Q Q b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? Q d) Alterations to the present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? El Q e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? El El f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? D -~ ~ I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Yes Maybe No XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, orresultin a need for new or altered government seNices in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? Q b) Police protection? c) Schools? Q d) Parks and other recreational facilities? Q e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f) Other governmental services? C3 Q XV. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of .bjel or energy? Q C3 b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Q Q XVI. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS. Wi~ the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? Q Q b) Communications systems? Q Q c) Water? C3 d) Sewer or septic tanks? E3 El e) Storm water drainage? C9/ Q Q f) Solid waste disposal? Q Q El/' XVII. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? D D b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? D Q XVIII. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in: a) The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public?Q Q b) Creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?Q Q XIX. RECREATION. Wifl the proposal result in: a) Impact upon the quality of existing recreational opportunities?Q Q b) Restrict the religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? CITY OF RANCH O CUCAMONGA Yes Maybe No X. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Wifltheproposah a) Result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeologicai site? Q C3 Ef'/ b) Result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? E] Q EY" c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Q Q Ey/ XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant.or animal co~'rnunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California · history or prehistory? Q Q b) Short-term:Doestheprojecthavethepotentialtoachieveshort- term, to the advantage of Iong-te~m, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definite period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) Q Q El,/ c) Cumulative: Doesthe project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect on the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) Q Q d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirecfiy? Q Q XXIIo DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. (Attach additional sheets with narrative description of the environmental impacts,) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA XXIII. DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS. (An examination of whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls.) /~ -~/~-. XXIV. DETERMINATION. (To be completed by Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: a) I find that the proposed project cozzld not have a significant effect on the environment, and A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared .............................. b) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because ~nitigatio;~ rn~sz~ras described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared .............................. G]/' c) I find the proposed project rna.~ have a significant effect on the environment, and An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required ......................... Q Signature "' ' ~ Print Name / ~ ~e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Initial Study - Part II Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Project Description: Development Review 95-33 Hill Pinckert Architects/Koll Co. 2 Industrial Buildings totaling 471.625 square feet SIS Arrow, E/O White Oak I. Earth: a) The site is not within any known unstable eadh condition area. b) The site will be graded to accommodate the building pad for the proposed use. The grading will be conducted under the supervision of a licensed surveyor or registered geologist. The impact to the soil is not significant. c) The topography of the site will be altered slightly to accommodate the building pads. The grading will be supervised by a licensed soils engineer or registered geologist to ensure compliance with Building Code requirements. The impact is not significant. d) No known or unique geologic or physical features exist on this site. e) Upon completion, the site will be landscaped and/or paved to prevent soil erosion. f) The subdivision should not affect any oceans, bays, rivers, or lakes. - g) The majority of California is susceptible to earthquakes. The project is not within any known special study zone that will require additional studies or that poses a unique hazard. II. Air: a) At this time, the tenants of the buildings are not known. The construction of the buildings will not result in substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality. b) The proposed industrial buildings will not create any objectionable odors. c) The proposed industrial buildings will not result in alteration to the climate or air movement. III. Water: a) The development of two industrial buildings will not affect the currents or course of water movement. b) The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and hard scape proposed. The original Master Plan approved for the site identified the need for storm water detention facilities because of inadequate storm drain capacity downstream. The applicant was required to complete a hydrology study that identified on-site water storage facilities during the Q100 event. INITIAL STUDY PART 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Hill Pinckert Architects/Koll Co. Page 2 With the application, the applicant is proposing to modify the design and location of the storage facilities. A revised hydrology report was submitted by the applicant and approved by the City. The applicant will be required to install those improvements identified in the hydrology report to ensure appropriate drainage for this property and downstream properties. c) The project will not alter the course or flow of flood waters. d) The development of the industrial buildings will not affect the amount of surface water in any body. e) The project will not be discharging into any surface waters. f) No alteration of groundwater is expected to occur with this project. g) No direct additions or withdrawals of ground water are proposed. h) The project is anticipated to use only that amount of water necessary for sanitary and cleaning purposes. The amount of water usage is not significant. i) The project is outside of the established flood plain. IV. Plant Life: a) No significant vegetation exists on-site. b) There are known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) Landscaping introduced to the site will be compatible with existing landscaping material. d) No agricultural crops exist on-site. V. Animal Life: a) There are no known animals that currently occupy the site on a regular basis. b) There are no known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) No new species will be introduced as a result of the project. d) The project is located within the interior of the City, surrounded by development. In that no animals currently use the site on a regular basis, the development of two industrial buildings will have no impact on fish or wildlife habitat. VI. Noise: a) The construction of the industrial buildings will increase the noise level by the mere fact that the property is currently vacant. The level of noise increase, however, is consistent with surrounding properties and is not significant. b) The noise levels will be no greater than the existing noise levels. VII. Light and Glare: a) New light and glare will be created because the property is currently vacant. A condition of approval requires the applicant to submit a lighting plan for review and approval to ensure the light does not spill over onto adjacent INITIAL STUDY PART 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Hill Pinckert Architects/Koll Co. Page 3 properties. Therefore, the impact can be mitigated to a level less than significant. VIII. Land Use: a) No land use alteration is proposed with the application. The industrial buildings are permitted in this location by the Industrial Area Specific Plan. IX. Natural Resources: a) The development of the buildings will not have a significant impact on natural resource consumption. X. Risk of Upset: a) At this time, the application does not include storage and/or handling of hazardous materials that might result in an exptosion or release of hazardous substances. b) The industrial buildings will not interfere with emergency 'response. XI. Population: a) The project will have no impact on the population of the City. XII. Housing: a) The project will not create the need for additional housing other than what has already been anticipated by the General Plan. XIII. Transportation: ' a) The project will generate additional trips because of the new construction and the type of business. The previous application. for which a Negative Declaration was prepared, would have generated more traffic than the current proposal. The EIR prepared for the industrial Area Specific Plan identified street widths to meet the needs of the industrial users. The number of trips anticipated with the application is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR conditions. b) Additional parking will be necessary to handle the patrons and staff of the facility. All required parking will be provided on-site. c) The proposal is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan for which the street widths were evaluated at a build-out condition. The streets in and around the area are developed to adequately accommodate the anticipated trips. d) The project will maintain the existing circulation patterns for the movement of goods. e) The project will not affect air, water, or rail traffic. f) The application is expected to increase the risk of traffic hazards because of the new construction. The driveways have been spaced to provide INITIAL STUDY PART 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Hill Pinckert Architects/Koll Co. Page 4 maximum safety available and pedestrian amenities (sidewalks) will be installed as part of the project. The impact is not significant. XIV. Public Services: a) The project will require additional permitting and inspection by the Fire District to ensure Code compliance with the Fire Code. The impact is not significant. b) No substantial new services are expected with the project. c) The school districts having jurisdiction have notified the City of the current impaction problems. The project, however, will not increase the number of students. d) The project will have no impact on existing park facilities. e) The site abuts an existing road that is being maintained by the City. No additional impacts on public facilities are expected. f) No other government services are expected to be affected by this proposal. XV. Energy a) The project is not expected to use substantial amounts of fuel or energy. b) The development is not expected to result in substantial increase on the demand of existing energy sources or the need for new energy sources. XVI. Utilities and Service Systems: a) The facility will be able to tie into existing gas facilities available in the street, if needed. b) The facility will be able to tie into existing communication systemS' available in the street, if needed. c) The facility will use water readily available in the existing streets. d) The discharge from the site will be handled by the existing sewer facilities. e) The amount of additional run-off created by the development is not significant. In order to protect downstream properties, the applicant is required to provide on-site storm water detention facilities.' A hydrology report has been provided and approved by the City that establishes the location and size of the facilities. The applicant will be required to construct those improvements as indicated in the report and as shown on the grading plan. f) No significant solid waste disposal will be necessary to serve the site. XVll. Human Health: a) The development is not expected to create any health hazard. b) No exposure of people to potential health hazards is expected. XVIII. Aesthetics: a) The project will not obstruct any view or vista currently available to the public. INITIAL STUDY PART 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Hill Pinckert Architects/Koll Co. Page 5 b) The project will conform to the strict design guidelines of the City thereby eliminating any offensive site visible to the public. XIX. Recreation: a) No existing recreational facilities will be impacted by the facility. b) No known religious or sacred uses are presently conducted on-site. XX. Cultural Resources: a) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. b) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. c) The project should not impact any unique ethnic cultural values. XXI. Mandatory Findinqs of Significance: a) No known animal or wildlife species are expected to be substantially adversely impacted by the project. b) There are no known long-term environmental impacts that are expected to occur as a result of the project. c) While the amount of additional run-off generated by the development is not significant, the development will be required to install on-site detention facilities to protect downstream properties in the case of a Q100 event. The hydrology report approved by the City identifies the size and location of these facilities and they are shown on the conceptual grading plan. d) It is not anticipated that the project will have any adverse impacts on human beings. EARLIER ANALYSES ,1 ) The application is part of the Industrial Area Specific Plan for which an EIR was prepared and certified by the City. This document is available at the Planning Division, City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive. 2) The Master Environmental Assessment for the General Plan was also referenced in evaluating the potential impacts of the application. This document is available for review at the Planning Division, City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive. 3) A previous Environmental Assessment was conducted for Parcel Map 12959 and Development Review 91-08. This analysis led to the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the Planning Commission on January 8, 1992. The Negative Declaration and supporting documents are available for review at the Planing Division, City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 95-33, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT TWO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 471,625 SQUARE FEET ON 23.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE AND EAST OF WHITE OAK AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-471-08. A. Recitals, 1. Hill Pinckert Architects has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 95-33, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of March 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh in the Recitals, Pad A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on March 13, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located south of Arrow Route and east of White Oak Avenue with a street frontage of 500 feet along Arrow Route, 575 feet along Oakwood Place, and 1,040 feet along Tacoma Drive, and is presently vacant; and b. The properties to the nodh, east, and west of the subject site are designated for industrial uses and are developed with manufacturing buildings. The property to the south is designated for industrial uses and is vacant; and c. The application, with the attached conditions of approval will comply with the applicable standards of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Development Code; and d. The development of two industrial buildings is consistent with the General Industrial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan. e. The propedies are within an area which has inadequate storm drain capacity downstream; however, the project is required to construct new on-site storm water detention facilities designed to handle a Q100 event. D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 95-33- HILL PINCKERT ARCHITECTS March 13, 1996 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicini:ty. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project. no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration. the staff repods and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions. attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) Building No. 2 shall be revised to provide glazing at the northeast comer of the building. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 95-33 - HILL PINCKERT ARCHITECTS March 13, 1996 Page 3 2) The screen wall shall be designed to include a vedicat sandblast section located on both sides of the lower wall element. The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 3) Extensive landscaping shall be provided along the street frontages. The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. Enaineerina Division 1) All applicable conditions of Parcel Map 12959 shall be complied with. A special concern, and hereby pointed out, is Planning Commission Resolution No. 95-47, which modified Engineering Special Condition No. 6, of Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-04, for Tentative Parcel Map 12959 as follows: The developer shall reimburse all Transportation Fee Credit allowed to date for Tentative Parcel Map 12959. Neither building permits or occupancies shall be issued until all Transportation Fee Credits are paid back to the City. All future projects shall pay appropriate Transpodation Fees upon issuance of building permits. Pursuant to the modified condition, no building permit will be issued until said Transportation Fee Credits are paid back. 2) City improvement Drawing No. 1472 shall be revised to reflect new or removed ddve approaches, as proposed by the building sites, and any other construction items affected, such as, street trees, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lights. 3) Existing "No Parking" to be maintained on both Oakwood Place and Tacoma Drive. 4) The proposed wrought iron gates enclosing the dock area for Building No. 2, located over parcel 3 of Parcel Map 12959. are not allowed. Mifiqation Measures 1 ) All drainage facilities, as required by the hydrology study for Parcel Map 12959 on file in the City Engineer's office, shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The plan review and approval of said drainage facilities will be coordinated between the Engineering and Building & Safety Divisions, due to the master plan of drainage detention requirements for the area and this being a private system. 2) A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Rancho Cucamonga Police Department prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent propedies. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 95-33 - HILL PINCKERT ARCHITECTS March 13, 1996 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall cedify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPUCANT: LocATDN: Those items chewed are ~?d~ions 01 ~proval. , ..... APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION , (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time LImits Complcdon pat= v/' 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ----/ / not issued or approved use has not co mmenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. DevelopmentJDesign Review shall be approved prior to / ! , .__/ / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of __.J / 4. ThedevelopershaIIcommence,participatein, andconsummateorcausetobecommenced, .__/ / participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facttitles District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to alt specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all ! applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shaft be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes .__/ / first, the applicant shall consent to, or padicipate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Furlher, il the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance '-of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC- 10/94 1 Com~ledon Date: This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. V/ 6. Prior to recordalton of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is __/ / involved, written cedification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district wit hin 90 days prior to fi hal map approval in t he case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development v/' . 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the appmved plans which .__/ / include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and //,/Z~Tr,~/,~ ~ Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any. U_se of the project site or business activity being .commenced thereon, all __/ / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Pla'nner. 3. OccupancyofthefacilityshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtimeasaitUniformBuildingCodeand ._J / State Fire Marshairs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be .__/ / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. v/ 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ---/ / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. V/ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development .__/ / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. V/' 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and .--/.--J Sherifrs Depadment (989-6611 ) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate sfyle, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units .__J / with all receptacles shielded from public view. v/ 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, .---/ / and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. v/ 10 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall .__J / be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berrning, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City SC * 10/94 2 Compledon Date: 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with j / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. v'/ 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, J / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and .__/ / weed control. in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements· 14.TheC~venants~C~nditi~nsandRest~cti~ns(CC&Rs)s~aitn~tpr~hibit~hekeeping~fequine -.--/ / animals where zoning requ iremerits for the keeping of said animals have been met. individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the .__/ / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded .¢oncunZ.9.ntly with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. VZ 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ._J / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or .-J / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units tot use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the linal map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, struclures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and ._J / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interi~ra~terati~nswhicha~ecttheexteri~r~fthebui~dings~rstructures~remova~~~~andmark trees, demolition, relocation. reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall,require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C, Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units -.--J / and for heating any swimming pool or spa. unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shaft have the front, side and rear elevations 'Upgraded with architectural ---J / treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. sc- 1o/94 3 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. V/ 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _J / projections, shall be shie Ided from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D, Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) v/ 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall .__J / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curD). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and rexlured pavement across circulation aisles shall be J / provided throughout the deve lopmerit lo connect dwellings/units/bu tidings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. V" 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and aU driveway aisles, .._J / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shal]'t{e provided with garage do~r openers if advewa~'are less than18 feet in / / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. TheC~venan~s~C~ndi~i~nsandRestric~~nssha~~restdctthest~rage~~recreati~na~vehic~es J / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. v/ 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitled for the City Planner, City Engineer, and .--/ / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of bu tiding permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) V/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planling and model home landscap- .J / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier .L_._/ / in accordance with the Mu nicipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on t he grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arberist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming methods. 3. Aminimumof__treespergrossacre,comprisedofthefollowingsizes, shallbeprovided __JJ within the project: % - 4.8- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger. __ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and __% - 5 gallon. v/' 4. A minimum of ,Z~9 % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. V/ 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three .._J / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC- ]-0/94 4 pr~i~c~ h'o.~'~'-J~ ~/' 6. Treesshallbeplantedinareasofpublicviewadjacenttoandalongstructuresatarateofone CornolctjonD~te: tree per 30 linear feet of building. J / v/' 7. A~~privatesI~pebanks5feet~r~essinvertica~heightand~f5~1~rgreaters~~pe~but~essthan __J / 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. v/ 8. AIIprivateslopesinexcessof5feet,butlessthan8feet inverticalheightandof2:lorgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one S-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- --J / ously maintained in a healthy and Ihdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy forthose u nits, an inspection shall be con_du_cted by the Planning Div!sion to determ. ine that .they are in satisfactory condition· 10. For multi-lamily residential and non-residential development, property owners are respen- ._J / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or J / · This requirement shall be in addition to 1he required street trees and slope planting· 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. /' 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- :-.J / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along V/ 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on .J /.~ the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. v/ 15. All wallsshallbeprovidedwithdecorativetreatment. lflocated inpublicmaintenanceareas, .J / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted tor City Planner review and ~ / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteda shall encourage the natural growlh characteristics of the selected tree species. ) '/' 17. Landsoaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of .J / Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Flancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Sc- lo/94 5 Proiect F. Signs Completion Date: v/' 1. ThesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareC0nCeptualonlyandnOtapartofthiSapproval. .__/ / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall r,equire separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any S~gns. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and __/ / approval pdor to issuance of building permits, 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhome,, __J / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock .J / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner. prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted --/ / Special Studies_ Zone for the Red Hill Faul:t, in a standard. lormat as determined by the City Planner, prior Io accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway .__/ / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the __J issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuationtobelow45CNEL, the building matedals and constmctiontechniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans wilt be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies v/' 1. EmergencysecondaryaccessshallbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire .J / Protection District Standards. v/ 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 leet wide ---/ / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. v/ 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be __/___.J submitted to the Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. 4. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and /.___/ location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all ---J / supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Hea~th and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. SC- 10/94 6 ~oiect ~o.~'~'-~-~ CornDiction Date: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (g0g) 989-1863, FOR CE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development v/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- -~/ / cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition /----/ to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautitication Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. /' 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or / / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include. but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee. Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. v/ . 4. Street addreSSes shall be provided by the Building Official: a~ert;'~L-'t/parcel map recordation __/ / and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances .--/ / considering use, area, and tire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for / / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the / / Uniform Plumping Code and Uniform Building Code. v/ 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for / / building permit application. K. Grading v'/ 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City /---/ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ---/ / perform such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance ---/ / Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agricu Itu re at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. __ 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at ----/ / the time of application for grading plan check. v/' 5. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved priorto issuance of building permits. J / SC- ]0/94 7 Comoledon Date: 6. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agree ment executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site ---J / drainage facilities necessary for dewatering aft parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to final map approval and prio rto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto ---/ / or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior lo issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided ---/ / properties, are to be installed pdor to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a pamel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety --J / Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 leet in vertical heighl shall be seeded with native grasses J / or planted .w~h ground cover for erosioncontrol upon completioO of grading or some of her alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigalion system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirernenls of Section 17.08.040 Iot the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, / / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feedertrails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets ---/ / (measured from street centerline): total feet on total feet on total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made .--/ / for all private streets or ddves. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: .__/ / 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs .__/ / or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or pdor to the issuance of buitding permits. where .0 map iS involved. D -~ 5'1 SC- 10/94 8 J Comvlction Date: 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall ~ provided and shall be delineated ~ / or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restriction area on the ~ / neighSring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: "MWe hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the constation of (residential) bu~dings (or other structures) w~hin those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas.' A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. AH exi~ing easements lying wRhin future rights-of-way shall be quRclaimed or delineated on J / the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks an~or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way J / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private prope~y. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated alo~ right turn lanes, to provide a minimum J / of 7 feet measured from the fa~ of cu~s. ft cu~ adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenaSe easement shall b~ provided. 11.Thedeve~rsha~makeag~dfaRheff~t~acquire~herequired~ff.sRepr~edyinterests J / necessa~ to ~nstm~ the required public i~fovements, and ~ he/she s~uld fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 6~62 at such time asthe City a~uires the prope~ interests required forthe improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the develo~r of all costs incurred by lhe City to a~uire the off-site properly interests required in connection with the su~ivision. Security for a ~ion of these costs shall be in the form ol a cash de~s~ in the a~unt given in an appraisal re~ obtained by the developer, at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the C~y prbr to ~mme~ement ol the appraisal. M. Street Improvements / 1. All public i~rovements (interior streets, drainage facit~ies, ~mmunity trails, paseos, J / lands~d areas, etc.) shown on the plans an~or tentative map shall be constm~ed to CRy Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, ~ and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be J / ~nst~ed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct the following ~rimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: ~1 / STRE~ N~E CURB & kC. SIDE- DRI~ ~EET I S~EET C~M MEDIAN BIKE G~R PVffi WALK APPR, LICKS SEES TRA~ I~ND ~AIL OTHER Completion Date: Notes: (a) Median island includes landsoaping and irrigation on meter, {b) Pavement reconstm~ion and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so mated, side- walk shall be cuNitinear per STD. 304. (d) If ~ mated, an iralieu of construction fee shall be provided for this ~em. 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plan including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- /,----/ toted Civil Engineer, shaPIro submitted to and approved by the CRy Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, priorto final map approval orthe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pedormed in public dght<.f-way, fees shall be paid and a .--/ / construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Paveme.nt.stdping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and.interoonnect conduit .J / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signalconduitwithpullbexesshallbeinstalledonanynewconstructlonorreconslructlon J / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for fufure traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on beth sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BC R, EC R or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: j / (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless othenMse specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four corners of intersections per City '~/ / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to Iraffic at all times with / / adequale detours during construction. A slreel closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to coverthe cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satislastion of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be __/ / installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. ._J / i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner priorto submittal for first plan check. _J / 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for .__/ / review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pri- vale streets, fees shall be paid and construcllon permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. v/' 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _._/ / accordance with the City's street tree program. SC- 10/94 10 v/ 7. latersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with Comalotion Dat¢: adopted policy. _._/ / a. On colle~or or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plowed for all project intersections, J / including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Land~aping and other obstmdions w~hin the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential ~reet inteme~ions shall have their noticeability improved, usually by J / moving the 2 +/- close st street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any wo~ w~hin the following right-of-way: JJ 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the -~/ / issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set o_f landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering public Works Standards -~J / shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occum first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos. easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/orform the appropriate Landscape and Lighting J / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer priorto final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the developer. 3. AIIrequiredpubliclandscapingandirrigationsystems shallbecontinuouslymaintainedbythe ._J / developer until accepted by the City. ' 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective __/ / Beautification Master Plan: O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or pertions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood ---/ /-~ protection measures shall be provided as cedified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone .~/ / designation removed from the project area. The developers engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. ~ 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final .--J / map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. sC - lo/o4 11 Project 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. / / 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. / / 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey ovedlows in the event of a / / blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities v/ 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system. water, / / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable 'IV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. V/ 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / v/ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Depadment of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first.. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into '--J / one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or ---/ / issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first. for: __J / 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of appodioning the assessments under Assessment District . among the newly created parcels. 4. EtiwandaJSan Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan ~ / Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: .__/ / 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community .__/ / Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase. sufficient improvement plans shall be com- .--/ / pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 987-6405, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: v/ 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. SC- 10/94 12 ~-/ 2. Fire flow requirement shall be z./~:::~p gallons per minute. __/ / A. A previous fire flow, conducled revealed gpm available at 20 psi. v/B. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. C. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. ¢/ 3.Fire~ydrantsarerequired.A~~requiredpub~ic~r~n-sitefirehydrantss~ai~beinsta~~ed~~ushed ---/ / and operahie priorto delivery of any combustible building mate dais on site (i .e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. /' 4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided priorto water plan approval. Required hydrants, .__/ / if any, will be determined by this department. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard· Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers· v/ 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits foe combustible construction,evidence shall be ..-J / submitted to the Fire Distdct t hat temporary water supply forfire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. ¢/ 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to ---J / ~ final inspection. 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: ---/ / Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. V" Other ,,,~_,~'Z) ,~2 Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manutacuring, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. Y' 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion ----/ / of sprinkler system. : v/ 9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: ----/ / /Per Rancho Cucamanga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. /California Code Regulations Title 24. "'/fNFPA 101. Other v'/ 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Distdct's fire lane standards, as noted: / / · /All roadways. Other SC- 10/94 13 v/' 11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. ---J / v/' 12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. ---/ / v/' 13. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide --J / at all times during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. v/ 14. All trees planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so .--/ / as not Io impede fire apparatus. 15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: '--/ / Lighted director within 20 feet of main entrance(s). Standard Directory in main lobby. Other v/ 16.AKn~xrapidentrykeyvau~tsha~~beinstal~edpriort~fina~inspection.Pr~~f~fpurchases~al~ -J / be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information ..... ¢/ 17.Gated/restric~edentryy(s~requireinsta~~ati~n~faKn~xrapidentrykeysystem.C~ntacttheFire / / Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 18. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. / / v/ 19. Plan check fees in the amount of $. ' have been paid. / / An additional $,~¢/Z~/Iz.P/IY'~ shall be paid: v/ Prior to water plan approval. Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.} and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. v/ 20. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: ---/ / v//A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. ',/B. Storage of readily combustible material. C. Places of assembly (except churches, schools and other non-profit organizations) D. Bowling alley and pin refinishing. E. Cellulose Nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin). F. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet. G. Garages Motor vehicle repair (H-4) p __ ,~' H. Lumber yards (over 100,000 board feet). SC- 10/94 14 ,,~ ~'~-,.,~..~ I. Tire rebuilding plants. J. Auto wrecking yards. Junk or waste material handling plants. K. Flammable finishes. Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanls, electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder coating and organic peroxides and dual com- ponent coatings (per spray booth), L. Magnesium (more tha 10 pounds per day). M. Oil burning equipment operations. N. Ovens (industrial baking and drying). O. Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 pounts of refrigerant). P. Compressed gases (store, handle or use exceeding 100 cubic feet). Q. Cryogenic fluids (storage. handling or use). R. ' D~S~'-producing processes and'equipment. S. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage, handling or use). v'/T. High piled combustible stock, U. Liquified petroleum gas (store. handle, transport or use more than 120 gallons). V. Matches (more than 60 MatchmaWs gross). W. Welding and cutting operations: to conduct welding and/or cul~ing operations in any occ.~pancy. SC-]0/94 15 RESOLUTION NO. 92-03A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 91~08, A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE APPROVED MASTER PLAN TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 471,625 SQUARE FEET ON 23.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE AND EAST OF WHITE OAK AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-471o08. A. Recitals. 1. Capellino and Associates has filed an application for the approval of a modification to Development Review No. 91-08, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of March 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby found. deten'nined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on March 13, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to properly located south of Arrow Route and east of White Oak Avenue with a street frontage of 2,040 feet along Arrow Route and 1,020 feet along White Oak Avenue. and is presently developed with seven industrial buildings; and b. On January 8, 1992. the Planning Commission approved Development Review 91-08 for the development of 31 industrial buildings; and c. The applicant requests approval to construct two industrial buildings totaling 471,625 square feet in the location that was previously approved for the construction of 13 smaller buildings; and d. The construction of two industrial buildings is consistent with the General Industrial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan; and e. The construction of the two industrial buildings is consistent with surrounding development in the area; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 92-03A DR 91-08 - CAPELLINO & ASSOCIATES March 13, 1996 Page 2 f. The industrial buildings, with the conditions of approval imposed on the application, will be consistent with the requirements of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above. this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to propedies or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and cedifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA.guidelines promulgated thereunder; and a Negative Declaration was issued by this Commission on January 8, 1992. Furlher this Commission finds that the application is in substantial compliance with the original approval for which a Negative Declaration was issued. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fodh in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Division 1) All applicable conditions contained in Resolution No. 92-03. approving Development Review 91~08 shall apply. 2) All conditions of approval contained in the Resolution approving Development Review 95-33 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 92-03A DR 91-08 - CAPELLINO & ASSOCIATES March 13, 1996 Page 3 A'FTEST: Brad Butler, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: