No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996/02/28 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA · PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 28, 1996 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Chairman Barker Commissioner Melcher __ Vice Chairman McNiel __ Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Lumpp III. Announcements IV. Consent Calendar ThefollowingConsentCalendaritemsareexpectedtoberoutineandnon-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15526 - LEWIS HOMES - The review of building elevations and site plan for 55 single family homes for a previously approved tract map consisting of 55 lots on 7.87 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units), located at the southwest comer of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive - APN: 1077-821-43 through 45 and 47 through 53. V. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address..4ll such opinions shah be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. B. MODIFICATION NO. 2 TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-49 - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A modification to the master plan of an integrated shopping center, Town Center Square, and the design review of the detailed site plan and elevations for Buildings 3 and 7, two retail buildings totaling 51,820 square feet, and Buildings 13 and 14, two freestanding retail buildings totaling 16,500 square feet, in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL COMPANY- A request to construct a scrap steel -, recycling facility and finish steel distribution center on a 29.26 acre lease site in the Heavy Industrial Area (Subarea 15) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan generally located north of 6th Street, south of the Metrolink fight-of-way, and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-283-27. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14803 - ~ - Review of the subdivision design, detailed site plan, and building elevations for 43 single family homes on 7.23 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the north side of Elm Avenue, east of Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-421-26 and 27. Staff recommends issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15725 - ~ - Review of the subdivision design, detailed site plan, and building elevations for 30 single family homes on 3.45 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Tetra Vista Planned Community, located on the south side of Tetra Vista Parkway, west of Belpine Place - APN: 1077-091-35. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. VI. Public Comments This is the time andplace for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VII. Commission Business VIH. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11.'00 P.M. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission will adjourn to a workshop immediately following in the Rains Room regarding Pre-Application Review 96-02. That agenda is posted separately. 1, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certi.~ that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 22, 1996, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Rancho Cucamonga. / VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: February 28, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15526 - LEWIS HOMES - The review of building elevations and site plan for 55 single family homes for a previously approved tract map consisting of 55 lots on 7,87 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units), located at the southwest corner of Miltiken Avenue and Mountain View Drive - APN: 1077-821-43 through 45, and 47 through 53, SITE DESCRIPTION: The site is currently vacant with an average slope of 2 % percent from north to south. The Greenway Trail borders the site on the south side. The project abuts existing single family residential to the west. Mountain View Drive and Millikan Avenue border the site on the north and east. respectively. ANALYSIS: A. Background: On September 8, 1993, The Planning Commission approved the Tentative Tract Map and Design Review applications for Tentative Tract 15526. The original approval consisted of 56 lots utilizing the same street configuration as shown with the application. The product type was designed as two-story, zero lot line homes. The project was planned as an extension of the 'Corsica' project to the west. B. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 55 single family lots ranging in size from 3,509 to 6,572 square feet with an average lot size of 4,368 squar~ feet. The applicant is proposing center plot units to replace the previously appreved zero lot-line product. In doing so, one lot is being deleted from the original approval. The unit mix consists of one single- story floor plan and three two-story floor plans. The single story units are plotted on corner lots, where possible, and paired to provide variation in the streetscape. Under the Terra Vista Planned Community requirements, single family residential development shall maintain a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet with an average lot size of 5,500. If however, the applicant proposes an "innovative" product type. the minimum and average lot size requirements can be reduced to 3,500 and 4,000 square feet, respectively. The proposals by the applicant are consistent with the "Calais" project located at the southwest corner of Millikan Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway. The Calais project was ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR FOR 'I'1' 15526- LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 2 previously recognized by the City as an innovative product and was a Design Award winner in 1989. The units provide low walls at the front of the buildings to provide greater variation along the streetscape and create small coudyard areas within the front yard. The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission continue to consider the units as innovative. C. Desiqn Review Committee: On January 16, 1996 the Design Review Committee (Lumpp, McNiel, Henderson) reviewed the application and recommended approval as submitted by the applicant. Minutes are attached (see Exhibit "F"). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the Design Review for Tentative Tract 15526 through adoption of the attached Resolution. City Planner BB:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" Site Plan Exhibit "D" Conceptual Landscape Exhibit "E' Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Design Review Committee Minutes of January 16, 1996 Resolution of Approval ,/ TENTATIVE TRACT NO, ':15526 ~::!:~,'~.i;,~,,:::,'-L-"C,.~!.-:-:~;.,~-:;~+~:~':.~:,.',-~!:,~.. I ,, TRACT NO. 13717 TRACT NO. 13270 / TENTATZVE TRACT HAP -~,////%//e ,~...- __ / '/~// / ' /®/ / .@/ / /  TENTATIVE TRACT NAP ~-/~e/' TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15526 ::Z>W~'~'* ....... """'® ,, ...."' ,----_ DETAILED SITE PLAN  TENTATIVE TRACT NO, ~5526 "l .......................... ~'~ " ""--./ /i .[ .......,". /O / J / / / '/~/~ / / :'.1 % ~o. ' CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN TERRA VLSTA ~ PACT MAP # 1 ~ L- l :2'-~.,"-',-"~' ' EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEXTERIOR MATERtALS I EXTERIOR MATERIALS DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS · " 5:40 p.m. Scott Murphy January 16, 1996 DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15526 - LEWIS HOMES - The review of building elevations and site plan for 55 single family homes for a previously approved tract map consisting of 55 lots on 7.87 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling its), located at the southwest comer of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive - APN: 1077-821-43, 44, 45, and 47 through 53.. Design Parameters: The site is located north of the Greenway Park, east of Tract 14365, commonly referred to as "Corsica," and south of Tract 12671, commonly referred to as "Calais." On September 8, 1993, the subject site was approved for 57 zero lot line homes. The applicant has been processing the final tract map and was ready to record the map when they decided to pursue a different product type. Staff Commen(s: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Within the Low-Medium Residential standards of the Terra Vista Community Plan, there are two sets of development standards - those that apply to single family, detached, center plot homes and those that apply to "innovative" product types. Under the center plot requirements, the minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet, with an average lot size of 5,500 square feet. Under the innovative product type, the minimum lot size may be reduced to 3,500 square feet, with an average lot size of 4,000 square feet. As mentioned previously, the tract was originally approved with innovative product type (zero lot line) allowing the reduced lot sizes. The applicant is now proposing a center plot unit consistent with the Calais project to the north. When the Calais project was originally approved by the Planning Cornmission, the product type was approved as "innovative" with lot sizes slightly smaller than those proposed for this site. The project made use of a mix of one and two-story units incorporating courtyards created by architecturally integrated wails at the front setback. In order for the applicant to proceed with the Calais product type for this project, the Planning Commission must reaffirm their determination that the Calais is an innovative product type. Secondary Issue:~: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Single story units should be provided on all comer lots and within long rows of units to break the two story massing along the streetscape. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee determine if the product type presented by the applicant constitutes an "innovative product type" consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan and forward that recommendation to the Planning Commission. Also, the appropriate conditions of approval should be attached to address any design considerations. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Larry McNiel, Larry Henderson Staff Planner: Scott Murphy The Committee reviewed the application and rgcommended approval as submitted by the applicant. i',-I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15526, THE CONSTRUCTION OF 55 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE8 IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (4-8 DWELLING UNIT8 PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY. LOCATED AT THE 8OUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDING8 IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-821-43 THROUGH 45, AND 47 THROUGH 53. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Homes has filed an application for the Design Review of Tentative Tract No. 15526, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of February 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on February 28, 1996, including written and oral staff reports. this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninc~ Division '; 1) All applicable conditions contained in Resolution No. 93-71 approving Tentative Tract 15526 shall apply. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR TT 15526 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 2 2) Return fencing shall be provided between each unit. The fencing shall be decorative to match the building elevations. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issnarlce. 3) Comer side yard walls/fencing shall be provided. The walls shall be set back 5 feet from the back of the sidewalk. Landscaping shall be provided between the wall and the sidewalk and shall be maintained by the homeowner. The wall shall receive a decorative treatment. The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. Engineering Division 1) The developer shall initiate a new plan check (including fees) for the revised final map and improvement plans for Tentative Tract 15526, since many tot lines and all drive approach locations have changed. 2) Standard Condition L.7 for Tentative Tract 15526 (Planning Commission Resolution 93-71) no longer applies. 3) Widen the side yard of Lot 27 as needed and/or provide an extra depth footing for the structure on said lot, to accommodate a repair trench for the deep storm drain within a minimum 12-foot public storm drain easement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Buildin9 Official. Provide calculations to demonstrate that the house will not create surcharge loading on the storm drain. 4) Driveways on comer Lots 7, 30, and 43 shall be located as far from the intersection BCR as the lot size will allow, to minimize conflicts between vehicles turning right and those backing out of driveways. 5) At a minimum, the drive approach (top of "x") shall be 10 feet from the BCR on Lots 6, 30, 38, and 43. 6) Since ddve approaches shall not exceed 40 percent of the lot frontage, the 16-foot approach width will only be allowed on lots with 40 feet or more of frontage. 7) Adjust drive approach placement on Lots 24 and 36 as necessary to accommodate catch basin locations. 8) The surface overflow drainage easement south of the sump catch basins on Amiata Ddve shall be located on Lot 24. This easement shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of blockage in a catch basin and provisions shall be made for overflows to pass through any walls placed across the easement. 9) This project is connected to or will disrupt an existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation area, Prior to new construction, a joint inspection and documentation of the existing area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing irrigation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR TT 15526 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 3 landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of both areas is required prior to the City's acceptance of the new area. 10) Because of traffic increases as a result of cumulative development within the Terra Vista Planned Community, the following traffic signals shall be designed and installed in a progressive manner, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway, Milliken Avenue at Church Street, Church Street at East Elm Avenue, and Church Street at Spruce Avenue. The developer shall submit a list of upcoming projects which may be eligible for Transportation Development Fee credits and a construction phasing plan for traffic signal installation, using a balance sheet format to keep track of costs and fee credits, for review by the City Engineer. Fee credits and construction status shall be updated as building permits are issued. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. AFPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1996. PLANNI ',IG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 1996 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSEN": COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RanCh~:;GL(c~hO g DEPARTMENI STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: .~2--.f/~A,/,~'1//-~"/.~/,'~ z~"z~---,'~¢' 155Z~ SUBJECT: 5~ ~/H~E ~/~/ ~S APPLICANT: ~/~ ~ LOCATION: ~ ~t~ ~ ~[~/~ ~[~ Those items chewed are Cond~ions of ~proval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time LImits CornDiction Date 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are --/ L not issued orapproved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / __/ / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of __/ / 4. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced __/ / participated in. or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specilications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes ._.J / first, the applicant shall consent to. or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, il the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC- 10/94 I Comr,l¢,.ion Date: This condition shall be waived i~ the CRy receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is ___// involved, written ceaification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed proleer shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of sub0 irision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential proleers. a. Site Development ¢"' 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which .__/ / include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations. and Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to.any. u_se of the project site .or business activity being .commenced thereon, all / / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefacilityshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtimeasallUniformBuildingCodeand / / State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grad ng. landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency pdor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and / / She[ltf's Department (989-6611 ) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. V//8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units / / with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet CRy standards. The final design, locations, / / and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ~ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall J / be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 'q l SC - 10/94 2 ComDlttion Date: 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with .__/ / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. V'/ 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, .__/ / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicaling trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and __J / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordalton of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&RS) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine .J / animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Arficles of incorporation of the .~/ / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They. shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the i~SGance of building permits, 'whichever octOrs firSi: ~, recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. AI parkways, open areas and landscaping shall bopermanently mainfained bythe properly ._J / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or _J / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and / / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterat ons which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demo it on, reiocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units .__/ / and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. v/ 2. All dwellings sha~q have the front, side and rear elevations "upgraded with architectural ----/ / treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. SC- 10/94 3 Proiect No.://E / ' "7_~ 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shah be Submitled for / / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air condilioners and other tool mounted equipment and/or ..._J / project ions, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffe red from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architeclurally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaclion of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on bulldlng plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall .~/ / contain a 12cinch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be -~J / pr~videdthr~ugh~utthedevel~pmentt~c~nnectdwe~lings/units/buildingswith~penspaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, .~/ / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shaj'l i~e provided with garage do0r openers if d~:ivewa~S'are less than18 feet in ---J / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles -----/ / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. V"' 6. Plans for any security gales shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and .~/ / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) V/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- --.J / ing in the case ol residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier __/ / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted o n the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detai led landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborisrs recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossacre,comprisedofthefollowingsizes, shall be provided ___/ / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, ~ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - .__/ / 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three /___j' parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC- 10/94 4 Completion Dais: 6. Treesshallbeplantedinareasofpublicviewadjacenttoandalongstructuresatarateofone tree per 30 linear feet of building. J / 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in ve~ical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than~ /.__ 2:1 slope. shall be. at minimum, irrigated and landsaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. AIIprivateslopesinexcessof5feet, butlessthanBfeet invedicalheightandof2:lorgreater / / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion ~ntrol and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or la~er size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size sh~b per each 100 sq. ~. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in veRical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size free per each 250 ~. ~. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to so~en and va~ slope plane. Slope planting required by lhis section shall include a permanent irrigation system to ~ inCalied by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- / / ously maintained in a hea~hy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is ~ Id and o~upied by the buyer. Prior to re leasing o~upancy for those u nits, an inspection shall ~ conducted by the Planning Division to determine that.they are .in satisfacto~ ~ition. 10. For mufti-family residential and non-residential development, prope~ ownera are resin- J / sible for the ~ntinual ~intena~e of all landsaped areas on-site, as we)l as ~ntiguous planted areas w~hin the public right-of-way. All landsca~d areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving ~ndition, and shall receive regular p~ning, fedilizing, ~wing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / / . This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter pa~ways. walls. landscaping, and sidewalks shall be J / included in the required landscape plans and shall ~ subject to C~y Planner review and approval andcoordinatedfor~nsistencyw~hanypa~ay land~aping planwhich maybe required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- :~ / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified lands~ping, is required along 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on _.J / the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. v/ 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, __J / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and _..J / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteda shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. v//' 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ..J / Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC- ].0/94 5 ~ Completion Dale: F, Signs 1. Thesignsindicatedonthesubmlttedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapadofthisapproval. / / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division priorto installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and / / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apadment, condominium, or townhomes / / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Sireel Rock .__/ / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopled --J / Special Studi. es_ Zone forthe Red Hill Fault, in a standard tormat as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway .J / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. ~ 4. A final acoustical repod shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the __/ / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below45CNEL, the building matedals and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final repeal. H. Other Agencies 1. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire J / Protection District Standards. V/ 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide ---J / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. v/ 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be J / submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. v/' 4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and w/ / location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shah be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. __ 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all --j / supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of "- Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance el building permits. SC- 10/94 6 ProiecI No.:,77~ Cornnledon Dsle: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DSVISION, (909) 989-1863, FOFI COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development v'/ 1. The applicant shall complywith the atest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- ---J / cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code. and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. '/" 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition --J~ to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limitedto: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or .__/ / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees. Permit and Plan Checking Fees. v/" 4. Streetaddre~s~`ssha~bepr~videdbytheB~iIding~icia~a~ert;a~t/parce~maprec~rdati~n __/ / and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for --/ / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the .__/ / Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted tot ___/ / building permit application. K. Grading / 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City --J /'- Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. v/ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ----/ / perform such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance .__/ / Permit is required, Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at ---/ / the time of application for grading plan check. v// 5. The~inaIgradingp~ansshaI~bec~mp~etedandappr~vedpri~rt~issuance~bui~dingpermits. J / SC- 10/94 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEI IORANDUM DATE: February 28, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-49. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM B As a result of discussions with representatives of Westem Development Company, Engineering staff have agreed to delete Engineering Division condition number 3 of Resolution 94-69B before you tonight. Parcel Map 14806 is currently in plan check and we feel confident it will record in a timely fashion. DJ:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: February 28, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION NO. 2 TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-49 - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO. - A modification to the master plan of an integrated shopping center, Town Center Square, and the design review of the detailed site plan and elevations for Buildings 3 and 7, two retail buildings totaling 51,820 square feet, and Buildings 13 and 14, two freestanding retail buildings totaling 16,500 square feet, in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. ACTION REQUESTED: The approval of the revised Master Plan, the project entry and plaza design, the building pads and elevations for Buildings 3, 7, 13, and 14, and the signs for Officemax, the tenant for Building 7. BACKGROUND: On December 19, 1995, the Commission held a workshop to review the development proposals. The Commission identified several design concerns and directed the applicant to work with staff in revising the development plans. On February 14, 1996, the Commission held a second workshop to review the revised development plans. The Commission determined that, with the recommended improvements, the revised development plans were acceptable. A copy of the February 14, 1996 staff report is attached to this report for reference (see Exhibit "A"). ANALYSIS: A. Proposed Development: The applicant is proposing to modify the Master Plan by eliminating building pads 10 and 11 within the lower central plaza so that the main entry driveway can be extended to the upper central plaza. This entry driveway is treated as a major entry statement consisting of a 24-foot wide landscape area on each side and embellished with double rows of trees, seat benches, textured pedestrian walkways, textured driveway pavement, and decorative light fixtures. Buildings 3 and 4, located west of the upper central plaza, are proposed to be combined into one Building 3. Building 7 is planned for an Officemax, a discount retail store of office products, office furniture, and services for printing and copying. The names of the potential tenants for Buildings 13 and 14 have not been released by the applicant. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 9349 - WESTERN DEV. CO. February 28, 1996 Page 2 B. Desian Review: At the February 14, 1996, workshop, the Commission concentrated on the design issues of the driveway alignment for the upper plaza, the tower design for Building 7, the signs for Officemax. and the gable design entries for Buildings 13 and 14. At the meeting, the applicant agreed to work with staff and the Design Review Committee to resolve these design concerns. As for the remaining design comments and staffs recommended improvements, the applicant agreed to revise the plans to address them. Exhibit "A" is a copy of the February 14, 1996, staff report which includes the action or recommended improvements from the Commission below each item (see bold face). C. Environmental Assessment: A Negative Declaration for the Master Plan was issued on July 27, 1994. The proposed revisions are in substantial conformance with the Master Plan and the Terra Vista Community Plan. Therefore, additional environmental review is not needed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the modification to Conditional Use Permit 9349 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectf submitted, BB:NF:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - February 14, 1996 Planning Commission Staff Report with Action Exhibit "B" - Approved Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Approved Upper and Lower Plazas Exhibit "D" - Proposed Master Plan Exhibit "E" - Proposed Project Entry and Plaza Design Exhibit "F" - Building 7 Elevations and Floor Plan Exhibit "G" - Building 3 Elevations Exhibit "H" - Buildings 13 and 14 Elevations and Floor Plan Resolution of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: February 14, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION NO. 2 TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9349 - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO. - A modification to the master plan of an integrated shopping center, Town Center Square, and the design review of the detailed site plan and elevations for Building 3 and 7, two retail buildings totaling 51,820 square feet and Buildings 13 and 14, two free standing retail buildings totaling 16,500 square feet, in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN: 1077421-58 and 63. BACKGROUND: On December 19, 1995. the Commission held a workshop to review the development proposals. The Commission identified several design concerns and directed the applicant to work with staff in revising the development plans. The applicant has worked diligently to prepare development plans for this workshop. Attached to this report are copies of the December 19. 1995 staff report and a set of the revised development plans. ANALYSIS: A. Revised ADolication: The applicant revised his application to include Building 3 elevations and increased the square footage of Building 3 from 12,000 to 15,800 and Building 13 from 7,500 to 9,000. The increase in square footage was to compensate for the elimination of Building 11, which has a square footage of 3,500. The square footage for the original approved master plan was 222,605; the square footage for the approved modification to the master plan was 225,316; and square footage for this proposed modification is 227,318. The number of parking spaces provided on-site can accommodate the proposed increase in square footage. B. Upper and Lower Plazas desion: The Commission stated that they would like to maintain the view corridor and the pedestrian promenade within the plazas and directed the applicant to study the options of having a centralized lower plaza or a major entry driveway. The applicant revised the upper plaza by expanding southward and opening up the lower plaza as a main driveway. This main driveway is treated as a major entry statement that leads to and ends at the upper plaza. The treatment consisted of a 24-foot wide landscape area on each side, a double rows of trees, continuous pedestrian walkways of textured material with a pattern, decorative light fixtures, and textured driveway pavement. The upper plaza, with the art piece display closer to the T intersection, will serve as a draw for pedestrians and a destination place. Based on review of this design, staff has identified the following issues as shown in Exhibit A: PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MOD. NO. 2 TO CUP 93-49 - WESTERN DEVEL. CO. February 14, 1996 Page 2 1. Provide dense planrings to achieve the proposed colorful plantings at the four corners of the 4-way intersection at the main entry driveway. ACTION: Applicant agreed and the item is conditioned. 2. Score sections of the curb at the middle section of the main driveway to coincide with the concrete banding where the decorative light fixtures are placed. ACTION: Applicant agreed and the item is conditioned. 3. Repeat the clusters of four palm trees at the upper end of the middle section as shown in Exhibit A. ACTION: Applicant agreed and the item is conditioned. 4. Provide the same kiosk design as Terra Vista Town Center for the seating at the four corners of the 4-way intersection for the main entry driveway. ACTION: Applicant agreed to provide seat benches subject to City Planner review and approval. 5. Consider straightening the portion of the driveway alignment just south of the Building 3 tower and modifying the parking area at the southwest side of the plaza, as shown in Exhibit A. The recommended improvements have the following advantages: cars coming from the Foothill Boulevard main entry driveway can make a 90-degree turn; traffic for the eastTWest main ddveway can be slowed down; increased square footage for the plaza. ACTION: Applicant agreed to work with staff in modifying the alignment of this portion of the driveway subject to City Planner review and approval. 6. Enlarge the small scale plaza tree wells to allow for colorful shrub plantings similar to the ones west of Starbucks. ACTION: Applicant agreed and the item is conditioned. 7. Add four palm trees along the circular area for the art piece and two trees at the northern portion of the plaza. ACTION: Applicant agreed to provide a total of six palm trees along the circular area for the art piece and add two trees at the northern portion of the plaza. 8. Embellish the plaza area with drinking fountains, colorful and attractive landscaping, potted plants, lighted decorative bollards, kiosks, etc. ACTION: Applicant agreed to embellish the plaza area with hardscape except for · ~ kiosks or lighted decorative bollards. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MOD. NO. 2 TO CUP 9349 - WESTERN DEVEL. CO. February 14, 1996 Page 3 C. Buildinq 7 - Office Max: The Planning Commission directed the applicant to include proposed signage on the elevations so that they could review the total design of the building. The building design has not changed since the last workshop. However, concept of signage for the tenant has been added and a building entry has been added to the west side of the tall focal tower. Staff has identified the following design issues: 1. South elevation. a. Add half-circle sconce light fixtures to the building entry consistent with the ones in the center. (A previous comment and can be conditioned.) ACTION: Applicant agreed and the item is conditioned. b. Even with the proposed signage, the building face for the main entry needs additional architectural elements. Staff previously recommended expanding upward the canterra stone molding or adding architectural elements to treat the building face. ACTION: Applicant agreed to work with staff in addressing this issue subject to · City Planner review and approval. 2. Tower at the southwest side of the Building. The revised design shows an arch element with metal grill work and a building entry has been added. Staff recommends the following improvements: a. Staff feels strongly that the tower needs to be pulled to the west side, a minimum of 6 feet, to allow pedestrians to walk under and through it. This would eliminate the need for an awning. The proposed tower for Building 3 does not have awnings. ACTION: The Commission accepted the design solution of recessing the tower entry at the west side and eliminating the awning. b. Add concrete molding on the columns at the level where the arch metal grill begins. (This item can be conditioned.) c. Add light fixtures. (A previous comment and can be conditioned.) d. Add architectural elements to the portion of the building face above the arch. Without architectural treatment, this portion of the building face is primed for the tenant to request placement of a signage. ACTION: The above items b through c are conditioned. 3. North and west elevations. These two elevations are the same ones that the Commission has reviewed. The applicant proposes to display an art piece on a portion of the building wall at the west elevation, The treatment to the wall for displaying the art has not been provided for review, PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MOD. NO. 2 TO CUP 9349 - WESTERN DEVEL. CO. February 14, 1996 Page 4 ACTION: Applicant agreed to submit design of the wall treatment for the display of the art piece in relation to the design of the plaza for City Planner review and approval. 4. Signs for Building 7. The applicant requests approval of signs for the tenant. Office Max proposes one primary sign and two secondary signs at the south elevation and one secondary sign at the west elevation. The primary sign consists of the words 'OfficeMax" and has sign dimensions of 4 feet by 31 feet, with a sign area of 124 square feet. The two secondary signs consist of the words "Copymax" and "Furnituremax." The sign dimensions for the two secondary signs are 2 feet by13 feet, with a sign area of 26 square feet; and 2.5 feet by 28 feet, with a sign area of 70 square feet, respectively. The one secondary sign at the west elevation is 'Copymax" and has the same sign dimensions as the other one. The color for the signs is white. a. The primary sign at the south elevation is acceptable. ACTION: Applicant informed staff and the Commission that the color for the primary and secondary signs is red. The Commission accepted the design and size of the primary sign, as well as the color for the primary and secondary signs. b. The two secondary signs of "Copymax", at the south and west elevations. are acceptable because Copymax is a service business and has a separate entry. This is consistent with past approvals where the Commission has allowed a secondary sign if the service or product is singular and different from the main use and has a separate entry. ACTION: The Commission accepted the 24-inch sign/letter height secondary sign at the south elevation only. c. Since "Furnituremax" does not have a separate entry, the approval of this secondary sign is inconsistent with Commission's policy. d. The maximum sign area for a business on one building face, according to the Sign Ordinance, is 150 square feet. The total sign area for Officemax at the south elevation is 220 square feet. If Officemax adds a separate entry for Furnituremax, the total signage still needs to meet the maximum of 150 square feet. ACTION: (Items c and d) The majority of the Commission accepted the scondary sign of "Furnituremax" subject to the following conditions: a maximum of 24-inch sign/letter height and a well defined separate entry subject to City Planner review and approval. D. Buildinq 3: This is a multi-tenant speculative retail building. The overall design is weak and lacks sophistication in areas of building form, architectural treatment and detailing. 1. South elevation. The building height of the retail space west of the tall tower is not in proportion with the tower. The hip roof building entry and the storefront design lack architectural treatment. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MOD. NO. 2 TO CUP 93-49 - WESTERN DEVEL. CO. February 14, 1996 Page 5 ACTION: Applicant agreed to work with staff in addressing the design issue subject to City Planner review and approval. 2. East elevation. Other than the proposed trellis, the storefront design is essentially one building plane, which needs to be architectural treated. ACTION: Applicant agreed to work with staff in addressing the design issue subject to City Planner review and approval. 3. Tower elevation. Same comments as items B2 b through B2 d. ACTION: The item is conditioned. E. Buildinq 13 and 14: The two buildings are designed for multiple tenants. The design has not changed since the last review. The square footage for Building 13 has increased from 7,500 to 9,000 square feet. 1. Provide additional architectural treatment such as wider precast concrete molding and key stones to the northwest gable entry for building 13 and the northeast gable entry for Building 14. Provide the same architectural treatment to the southeast gable elevation for Building 13 and southwest gable elevation for Building 14. (A previous comment.) ACTION: Applicant agreed and the item is conditioned. 2. Modify the northeast gable entry for Building 14 to address the Santa Ana winds. (A previous comment.) ACTION: Applicant agreed to address this issues and submit final design for Design Review Committee review and approval. 3. The overall design of the two buildings lacks architectural treatment and detailing. Add light fiXtures, special mullion patterns, architectural elements to enhance blank walls, etc. (A previous comment.) 'ACTION: Applicant agreed and the item is conditioned. 4. Increase the building setback for the southern portion of the west elevation to a minimum of 10 feet from the curb. The site plan shows only 4 feet. ACTION: Applicant agreed to work with staff in addressing this item, subject to City Planner review and approval. 5. Extend or pull the gable entries out similar to the gable entries of Building X (Men's Warehouse) in Terra Vista Town Center for Buildings 13 (northwest elevation) and 14 (northeast elevation). ACTION: Applicant agreed to address this issues and submit final design for Design Review Committee review and approval. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MOD. NO. 2 TO CUP 93-49 - WESTERN DEVEL. CO. February 14, 1996 Page 6 6. Show signage concept that can accommodate multiple tenants, ACTION: Applicant agreed and the item is conditioned. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission provide direction to the applicant regarding the above identified design issues. The application is pre-scheduled for the February 28, 1996 Commission meeting. If the Commission desires to review the revised plans or delegate them to the City Planner to review before Commission's final review and action, staff will be requesting a continuance of the hearing to another meeting. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Central Plaza and Entry Statement Exhibit "B" - ApprOved Upper and Lower Central Plazas Exhibit "C" December 19, 1995 Staff Report ........................................ ~,~,~- .... ........ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MASTEI~ SITE PLAN · .. ; : :: ,. - ::-'::, L _ :.._: ...... :', _z ",':'L ':,2:":' Z :_""_T:'::-:-:.~.~::.. : ""' ': [~.~ To~n Center Square PLANT PALETTE ~---_-.---:_=_ , '~ j~ ,,.~ ""'-'~':,,.,,., .......~ . , .. 7 NOBLE BEST BUY ' ~ :~' ~ BUILDING8 24,1808F " : ' ' ' ' : ' ;' "' ' ~ ' "~ BUILDING 14 7,500 SF U ; r l/I/z/ ~ ~ BUILDING 15 5,000 SF , "" ' '~OOTHILL BOULEVARD ri CONDOMINIUMS 'i~ '~ '~' ~..~.1!' .;?..:~.~.' '.:~' SECTION A-A PLANT PALE~E ................... Town Cenler Square ~ ~ ~ Term Visla ~" ...... I~ ~-- < .... I .... > NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION /ar~ '~"""":~"'~":'"~;: ........ 'T"~-fI~T'7'/r::/dr' WEST ELEVATION " SOUTH ELEVATION p~lT P / WESTEP, N / DEVELOPMENT CO. TOWN CENTER 5QUAF~E - ~UILDING #7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, KEISKER & W~GGLE LEVATION SCALE: ~/~"=~'-0" TOWN CENTER 5QUARI~ - BUILDING #7 WESTERN / DEyELOimblENT CO. TOWN CENTER SQUARE - ~UILDING #7 NORTH ELEVATION ,~'~ I I ~ ~ I I I I I ~ ....... · ........"""" ....... EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WESTElaN / DEVELOFMENT C TOWN CENTER 5QUARE - BUILDING #3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. KEISKER & WIGGLE A~CHITECT5 INC, 2/5/96 5CALE~ 1/~";1'-0" EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WESTERN / DEYELO~'MENT CO. TOWN CENTER 5QUARE-BUILDING #3 KEISKER & WIGGL~ ARCHITECTS INC. ~ / T ~ SCA~: ~'-~'-0' NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ROOF PLAN SOUTHEAST ELEVATION BUILDING 13 ,,-' ,,,' ,,,,..." "' SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. ~ ~,~,~,. NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION """"""""""""', """"""""""""', SOUTHWEST ELEV/~TION ~ ~ WEST ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, ~EISKEK & WIGGLE A~CHITECT5 INC, RESOLUTION NO. 94o69B A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION NO. 2 TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.93-49 FOR A MODIFICATION TO THE MASTER PLAN OF AN INTEGRATED SHOPPING CENTER, TOWN CENTER SQUARE, AND THE DESIGN REVIEW OF DETAILED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS FOR BUILDINGS 3 AND 7, CI'HE SIGNS FOR OFFICEMAX BUILDING 7), TWO RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 51,820 SQUARE FEET, AND BUILDINGS 13 AND 14, TWO FREESTANDING BUILDINGS TOTALING 16,500 SQUARE FEET, IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN. LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63. A. Recitals. 1. Western Development Co. has filed an application for a second modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 93-49, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of February 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc~monga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on February 28, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues with a street frontage of 1.600 feet and lot depth of 700 feet and is partially improved with a 57,500 square foot building and parking area; and b. The propedies to the north, east, and south are vacant. and the properly to the west is developed with a commercial center; and c. The design of the project, together with the conditions of approval, meets the applicable standards in the Development Code, the development standards, and the design guidelines in the Terra Vista Community Plan; and d. The development of the project will not have a significant impact to the environment; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-69B CUP 93-49 - WESTERN DEV. CO. February 28, 1996 Page 2 e. The development of the project will strengthen the commercial base for the City and provide a diversity of commercial centers for the residents. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set fodh in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the'proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan. 4. The Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration for the Master Plan on July 27, 1994, and the Commission finds there are no substantia changes to the design and the development of the Master Plan project. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth ~n paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planninq Division 1) All pertinent conditions of approval contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-69 and 94-69A, including Standard Conditions, unless as modified below, shall apply. 2) This approval is for the revised Master Plan and the building design for Buildings 3, 7, 13, and 14. 3) Project main entry promenade off Foothill Boulevard and central plaza design: a) Provide dense planrings to achieve the colorful planting at the four corners of the 4-way intersection at the entry promenade. b) Score sections of the curb at the middle section of the main driveway to coincide with the concrete banding where the decorative light fixtures are placed. c)Provide a cluster of four palm trees on each side of the upper end of the entry landscaped area. d) Add seat benches at the four comers of the 4-way intersection for the entry promenade and embellish the central plaza with bardscape such as seat benches, trash receptacles, decorative bollards, light PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-69B CUP 93-49 - WESTERN DEV. CO. February 28, 1996 Page 3 fixtures, drinking fountains, etc., subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. e) Modify the driveway alignment and the parking area south and west of the Building 3 tower, subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. f) Enlarge the small scale plaza tree wells to be similar in size as the ones west of Building 8 (Starbucks). g) Provide a total of six Palm trees along the circular area for the ad piece and add two trees at the nodhern portion of the plaza. 4) Install two works of art, one within the plaza and one on the west wall of Building 7, prior to release of occupancy for Building 7. 5) Complete the project entry promenade and the central plaza prior to release of occupancy for Buildings 3, 7, 13, or 14, whichever comes first. 6) Building 7: a) Add half-circle sconce light fixtures to the building entry. b) Add architectural elements to the main building entry elevation. Submit final design for City Planner review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. c) Recess the entry for the west side tower and eliminate the awning: Submit final design for City Planner review and approval, prior to issuance of building permits. d) Add architectural elements, such as but are not limited to, concrete molding, light fixtures, recessed basket weave, to the tower. e) Submit design of the wall treatment for the display of an art piece in relation to the design of the plaza for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. f') One primary sign consisting of "Officemax" at the main building entry with sign dimensions of 4 feet by 31 feet and a sign area of 124 square feet is approved. Two secondary signs consisting of one for "Copymax" at the building entry located on the west side of the south elevation and one for "Furnituremax" at the building entry located on the east side of the south elevation are approved. The maximum sign/letter height forthe two secondary signs is 2 feet. The approved color for the primary and secondary signs is red. g) Provide a separate and well-defined building entry for the east ~ide of the south elevation where "Fumituremax" is located, subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 7) Building 3: Provide additional architectural treatment, details, and elements to the south elevation, the tower elevations, and the east ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-69B CUP 9349 - WESTERN DEV. CO. February 28, 1996 Page 4 elevation, subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 8) Buildings 13 and 14: a) Provide additional architectural treatment, details, and elements such as, but are not limited to, wider pre-cast concrete molding for the building entries, light fixtures, special mullion patterns, etc.. subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. b) Modify the norlheast gable entry for Building 14 to address the Santa Ana winds. Extend, recess, or provide other design treatment to make the gable entries for the two buildings an architectural statement. Submit final design for Design Review Committee review and approval prior to plan check. c) Increase the building setback for the southern podion of the west elevation to a minimum of 10 feet from the curb subject to City Planner review and approval. En ineerin Division 1) All pedinent conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution 94- 69A, including Standard Conditions, shall apply unless modified below. 2) Condition No. 5C of Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-69A shall read as follows: Install traffic signals at the following intersections: Church/Milliken, Church/Elm (east), and Church/Spruce with any further development in Town Center Square. The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the Transpodation Development Fee in conformance with City policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3) Parcel Map 14806 shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-69B CUP 9349 - WESTERN DEV. CO. February 28, 1996 Page 5 A'R'EST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 28, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL COMPANY - A request to construct a scrap steel recycling facility and finish steel distribution center on a 29.26 acre lease site in the heavy industrial area (Subarea 15) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan generally located north of 6th Street, south of the Metrolink right-of-way, and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-283-27. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Developed Metrolink track and steel manufacturing; Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 15) South - Developed distribution facility; Industrial AreaSpecific Plan (Subarea 15) East - Portion developed, portion vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 15) and unincorporated territory West - Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 15) B. General Plan Designation: Project site - Heavy Industrial North - Heavy Industrial South - Heavy industrial East - Heavy Industrial West - Heavy Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant except for an abandoned section of rail spur. The portion which contained the rail spur has been graded, the remainder is undeveloped and covered with abandoned grape vines. The site slopes gradually to the south. The property, including the lease site is surrounded by chain link fence. IT]~4 C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL CO. February 28, 1996 Page 2 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to lease a vacant interior portion of Southem California Edison's steam generating facility site. Southern California Edison plans to ultimately use the site for expansion of their steam generating facility. The applicant has obtained a license from Southern California Edison, which is the equivalent of a year-to-year lease with a one year notice to vacate clause, but expects to occupy the site longer than five years. Therefore, aeeording to the Development Code the use is permanent not temporary. The applicant proposes to collect scrap steel on the site via truck transportation and ship it to a processing plant by rail. In turn, the rail cars will bring finished steel to the site for distribution in the area by truck. Therefore, the primary use of the site will be storage and distribution. Scrap metal and finished product will be stored outside. Some metal shredding will also occur. A small office building will serve as a check point for rail and truck transport. An above-ground storage diesel fuel tank is proposed, as well as an equipment maintenance The scrap operation may be allowed in the Heavy Industrial area (Subarea 15) subject to a Conditional Use Permit and requires the scrap piles to be fully screened from public view. Using a combination of berm, block wall, and landscaping, the applicant proposes to screen the scrap piles from the Metrolink right-of-way adjacent on the north and from 6th Street which is approximately 1,600 feet south of the scrap storage area. B. Design Review Committee: On February 6, 1996, the Design Review Committee (Lumpp, Henderson) reviewed and recommended approval subject to revised plans which include 200 linear feet of additional landscape screening on Southern California Edison property adjacent to the Metrolink fight-of-way and conditions noted in the attached ResOlution of Approval (see Exhibit "G"). C. Technical Review Committee: On February 7, 1996, the Technical Review Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the application subject to the conditions noted in the Resolution of Approval. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has bee~ completed by the applicant and Part II of the Initial Study has been completed by staff(see Exhibit "H'). Although the project could have significant impacts on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because of changes in the project design and mitigation measures which have been added to the conditions of approval for the project. If the Planning commission concurs with these findings, then issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL CO. February 28, 1996 Page 3 FACTS FOR FINDING: The project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. .CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 600 feet of the project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 95-37 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:MB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Elevations Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Line of Sight Exhibit "G" - Design Review Committee Minutes dated February 6, 1996 Exhibit "H" - Initial Study Part I and Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions ,, :.=]. ~ ~ -'Z-~ :~..~.::.k~ ....... l~' I " l ~"'~' ' ~'] NORTH STAR STEEL ITEM: C V 1~ qf-37- CITY 0I2 RANCHO CU'CAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION Q, 6 EXHiBiT: '/~ '/ SCALE: ...... ' _ - f . ~. < EAST ELEVATION - _ __ _ _ ~ _ Z --- ~z ~, _ ............. _ .... ~ ........ '~ ........ ~ ......... .,' I;' SOUIN ELEVATION WEST ~LEVATION *.:, SECTION BB. SECTION AA .......... NORTH STEEL w~tsot~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:00 p.m. Miki Bratt February 6, 1996 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PER2MIT 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL COMPANY- A request to construct a scrap steel recycling facility and finish steel distribution center on a 29.26 acre lease site in the heavy industrial area (Subarea 15) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan generally located north of 6th Street, south of the Metrolink rightzof- way, and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-283-27. The site is a vacant interior portion of Southern Califomia Edison's steam generating plant site. The applicant has obtained a license from Southern California Edison which is the equivalent of a year- to-year lease with a one year notice to vacate clause but expects to occupy the site longer than five years. Therefore, according to the Development Code the use is permanent not temporary. The primary design issue is screening. The Code requires that a scrap operation be fully screened from public view by "a solid wall or solid view obscuring fence." Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Commitlee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Metrolink Corridor Screen: Along the north and a portion of the west side the of the site, the applicant proposes a combination of landscaped berm and block wall to screen the scrap pile. The Code specifies a 15-foot high solid block wall, but a combination of berm and 8-foot high solid block security wall will meet the intent. The sight line detail indicates that the proposed combination will screen the scrap piles when viewed straight on. However, unless the screen is extended 200 feet toward the railroad spur along the east portion of the site, the scrap piles will not be fully screened from trains approaching from the east along the northeast sight line. The applicant states that Southern California Edison will not permit the berm to be extended beyond the lease site, nor permit a block wall along the east lease line. ' 2. Sixth Street Screen: The applicant proposes to provide screening with a landscaped berm adjacent to the right-of-way. The sight line detail indicates that the berm will screen the scrap piles. A chain link security fence softened by vines is also proposed. Full right-of-way landscaping is also proposed. Staff believes that with solid, view obscuring gates the screening requirement will be met. 3. The applicant proposes a 1,300 square foot, two-story modular steel office building modified by design elements such as a base course of split face block, as well as sheathing and a gable element to disguise the steel support structure for the second story modular unit. The primary function of the building will be to check incoming and outgoing trucks, therefore the building is flanked on the east and west elevation by drive aisles. The 22-foot heigh building is approximately 1,000 feet north of 6th street. It xvill be partially screened by the berm and DRC COMMENTS CUP 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL COMPANY February 6, 1996 Page 2 fence along 6th Street, but visible through the entry gate. Therefore, the applicant proposes landscaping for the north elevation, primarily two columnar trees, such as Italian cypress. Because of the distance from 6th Street and because the building functions primarily as a checkpoint for track traffic, staff feels that the design is adequate. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the committee review the site plan, elevations, and line-of-sight diagram and recommend approval of the application to the Planning Commission with conditions to address any outstanding concerns. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Larry Henderson Staff Planner: Miki Bratt The Committee recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Screen noaheast comer of lease site with dense landscaping extending approximately 200 feet eastward on Southern California Edison propen3' mixing plant material to match existing on southern California Edison site and to match new planting, including trees, along lease site. 2. To provide for truck queuing, the primary access gate shall be located approximately 100 feet north of the 6th Street right-of-way: it shall be constructed of solid material. 3. To provide Southern California Edison maintenance access, a second gate shall be provided along the 6th Street frontage: the drive approach shall be constructed to Engineering.st,indards and the gate of the lease site shall be obscured by construction out of solid material or by other means. 4. The design of the office is acceptable and a color palette shall be provided with the final submittal. ENVIRONM=NTAL HI 7" INFORMATION FORM (Part I-Initial Study) The purpose of this fomn is to inform the City of' the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full; INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. GEB'ERAL INFORMATIO~ Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: North Star Steel Recycling Facility Name & Address Of project owner(s): North Star Steel Comeany I5407McGinty Road Minneapolis, ~ 55391 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: Same as above Centact Person & Address: Mr. Micahel Sara[olean c/o North Star Steel Co., 15407 McGinty Road, Minneapolis, AN 55391 Telephone N-m~er: (612) 742-5464 N~me & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Philip M. Douqlos, P.E. c/o Associated Engineers, Inc. 3311 East Shelby Street, Ontario, CA 91764 C I T Y o f R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION Information indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. Provide a full scale (8-1/2 X 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): North o[ 6th Street; South o[ the Metrolink rail line; approximatel~ 3500 feet West of Etiwunda Avenue; bounded on ~st b~ an existinq Santa Fe R.R. drill track. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): A portion o[ APN 229-283-27 Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 28.95 Acres Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 26.7 Acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): No proposed GPA or Zone Change proposed. A CUP will be processed for approval of the steel recycling operation use. 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Conditional Use Permit, Encroachment Permit (City), Encroachment Permit (AT&SF RE), and Encroachment Permit (M.W.D.) 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In adddtion, site all sources of information (i-e., geological and/or hydmologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The proiect settinq exists aS ~Osicollv aden area with Dortions of o former vineyard ~r~Sent. The site lies within SouthOrn Gqlifqrnia Edison CamDory property adjacent and westerly of their steam coaenen- orion facility located at the M~ earner of Etl~nda Avenue and SiXth Street. The slope of the existing ground falls at between 19 - 2½8 to the South. The soil is sandy and soft. Plants orsire consist of old grapevines, desert-type grasses, scrub brush and sage brush. There are no mature trees artsite. Animals using the site consist of rodents, rabbits, birds, and small reptiles such as snakes and lizards. There ore no significant drainage courses orsire. The site is devoid of any special scenic aspects. The site is crossed by an underground ~,Qter line owned by the Metropolitan Water District and on underground Edison fuel oil line. A disconnected Edison Company Railroad spur exists st the northeast corner of the site. TWo power lines cross below the site from East to ~s t. Several power lines run North to South along the easterly limits of the site. A Santa Fe railroad drill track runs North-South along the westerly project limits. Sources: Visual In- spection. cJ7 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): Southern California Edison Company purchased approximately 206 acres on June 6, 1951. The Edison Company built the Etiwanda Steam Station on approximately 100 acres. The remaining 100 acres wore not needed for the steam station at that time. The Edison Company's records in- dicated that the property in question was used for a vineyard prior to 1951 and vines have continued On the property to date. The Edison Company has installed a railroad spur, two transmission lines, one fuel oil pipeline and one water line at different loga¢ion$ thrOuqhout the site. Easements have been granted to M.W.D. and AT&SF at two locations. 11) Describe any noise sottrces and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Current nois¢ source~ affecting the prnject Kite nr~ Metrnlin~ trains on North: truck and autnmnhil~ trafffn nn Southeast (Si~th Street): 1-15 traffic to the West; occasional aircraft overhead. No adverse effect~ expected for proposed use. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use which will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: See attachment/or pro/act description 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Land use for the ad/acent areas is industrial/vacant. There are no apparent historical or scenic aspects to the site. Areas around the site are vacant. The closest facilities are the Edison Steam _ Cogeneration Plant to the East, a Pic N Save ~rehouse on the South; Tomco Steel/Ameron Pipe Plant on the North; vacant land and [ree~:~v on the ~st 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The protect causes an increase of truck/trailer traffic on 6th Street and rail traffic on the e.~cisting drill line. Because the area is industrial already, the character of the surrounding area will remain unchanged. 15) Indicate the ty~ of short-term ~nd long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of sound proofing are proposed? Short-term and Ionq-term noise will consist o[ rail car and locomotive movement, deisel crane equipment. Expected noise levels will be in the 80-110 Db ranqe end will be shielded from adyacent properties by harm- ing, landscape and distance. Noise levels should not adversely affect adjacent properties. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or -replacements of mature or scenic trees: None - There are none artsite. 17) Indicate any bod/es of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site d/ains: The site will drain to Sixth Street. Flows in Sixth Street will drain to on existing storm drain in Sixth Street ~ich empties into an exist- ing open channel southwest of the project site under the jurisdiction of the City. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a- Residential (gal/day) N/A Peak use (gal/day) N/A b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/~ SF~ Peak use (gal/min/m) 25 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. __ Septic Tank ~ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (see Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a- Residential (gal/day) N/A b. Industrial/Commercial (gal/day/ac) N/A 20) Nnmher of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: N/A Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) ed range of sale prices and/or rents: ) S to S Rent month) $ to $ 22) Specify of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size 24) Indicate the expected of school chile ho~will be residing within the project: the appropriate Scho istricts as shown in Attac~unent B: a. Eleme~ ~ b. High: Senior High: · COMM~RCI_AL, IIqDUF:FJ_AL ~ INST/TUTIO~L~L P~kTECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function{s) of co~rcial, industrial or institutional uses: Scrap steel storage staging and preparation prior to shipment offsite by rail. Temporary storage for finished steel products prior to : shil3nent offsite by rail. 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: Total area of .the office complex is expected to..be less t~an 1300 S~F. 27) Indicate hours of operation: 24 hours/day, 7 days/~eek 28) Number of employees: Total: 20 - 22 Maximum Shift: 10 Time of Maximum Shift: 6 0.m. - 3 p.m. 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): A~naqer (1) $30,000 - 50, O00/Vr Laborer (3/shift) SS.O0 - lO/hr [,egistic~ ManaGer (1) S30,000 - 50,O00/yr F--quiFrnent Operator (3/shif() $10.00 - 12.00/nr Cler~ (2) $S.QO - lO.OO/hr 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: 20-22 t31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): Air pollution emissions will consist of exhaust fumes from locomotives, onsite deisel equipment, deisel delivery trucks and employee automobiles. 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. Yes City: ,\lo problem providing service Fire District: No problem providing service C.C.W.D.: No problem providing service 33) In the 'known histoO· of this propen)', has there been an), use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCE's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuel, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also, note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the propert}', as well as the dates of use, if 'knoxm. The Edison Company knows of nOw known use ofhazardous and "or toxic materials on this site. The use of pesticides and herbicides could have happened when the property, was used for vinevards in the ]950's. Local vineyards durint, the past faro' years have har~'ested the ,orapes but no active cultivations have been maintained by anV particular vineyard. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventoD' of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. There will be an an-site, above fround diesel fitel stora~oe tank to sen,ice operating' equipment. Equipment maintenance and refi,'elin~ will be coordinated at identified locations to prevent soil contamination from these activities. Am' spills will be cleaned up and disposed of immediateh' bV approved methods. The land owner, Southern California Edison Compare', will require North Star Steel to install a plastic liner under possible contamination areas to prevent soil contamination. l hereby certify that the statement furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the dam and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my abilit3', that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ] further undersm.nd that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Ci~, of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: Title: Vice President, Associated EnFineers Southern Ca~forn/a Edison Company :~UITE 210 430 NORTH VINEYARD AVENUE ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA g3764 Mr. Philip Douglas October 30. 1995 Associated Engineers 3311 East Shelby Street Ontario. CA 91764 Dear Mr. Douglas: SubJect: Etiwanda Steam Station Conditional Use Pe~dt for North Star RecycLing Company and Southern California Edison Company As requested In your letter of October 19. 1995. enclosed Is the Infoimatlon requested for the City's Environmental Information Form. The Edison Company has searched historical records and discussed this with the employees of our Etlwznda Stear Station. Please do not hesitate to caJl me at (909) 395-3352 if you have any questions or need addltjonaJ Infoznmtion. Sincerely. P~GIE L. LABRUM Enc. Real Properties Agent pLl RE:HAZARDOUS WASTE STATEMENT 10. Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. SIte all sources of Information (books. published reports and oral history): Southern Cnltforn2ta Edison Company purchased approximately 206 acres on dune 6, 1951. The Edison Company built the Etiwanda Steam Station on approximately 100 acres. The remaining 100 acres were not needed for the steam station at that time. The Edison Company's records indicated that the property in question was used for a vineyard prior to 1951 and vines have continued on the property to date. The Edison Company has installed a railroad spur. two transmission tines. one fuel oil pipeline and one water line at different locations throughout the site. Easements have been granted to Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. and to A.T. & S. F. at two locations for railroad spurs. 33. In the known history of th. ts property. has there been any use. storage. or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include; but are not titaired to PCB's: radioactive substance: pesticides and herbicides: fuel. oils, solvents, and other timable liquids and gases. Also. note understorage storage of any of the above. Please list t_he materials and describe their use, storage. and/or discharge on the property. as well as the dates of use. ff know. The Edison Company knows of no known use of hazardous and/or toxic materials on this site. The use of pesticicles and herbicides could of happened when the property was used for Vineyards in 1950s. Local vineyards during t, he past forty years have harvested the grapes but no active cultivations has been maint3ined by any particular vineyard. RE: HAZARDOUS WASTE STATEMENT HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCE SITE STATEMENT I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5 {copy attached) to notify the City as to whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located within an area which has been listed as the location of a hazardous waste or substance site by the Office of Planning and Research, State of California (0PR). O The project site is located on an area listed as a hazardous waste or substance site. The project site is not located on an area listed as a hazardous waste or substance site. Per City of Rancho Cucomonga Engineerin9 Department and attached letter from property owner, Southern California Edison Company. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: / Applicant/ NORTH STAR STEEL COMPANY 15407 McGinty Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55391 612-742-5464 FAX 612-742-6687 SUBJECT: Request for Conditional Use Permit for North Star Steel Recycling Facility to be located north of 6th Street, east of Etiwanda Avenue BACKGROUND North Star Steel Company is building a steel recycling mini mill in Kingman, Arizona. Finished steel products from t~is facility will be shipped to a number of markets in the Southwest and northern Mexico. North Star Steel will ship finished products into these markets by truck and rail The trucks and railcars wilt be sent out with scrap metal that will be recycled into new steel products at Kingman, or sold to other regional scrap consumers. North Star Recycling Company (NSR), a subsidiary of North Star Steel (NSS) seeks to create a scrap metal collection and distribution yard (Yard) on property owned by the Southern California Edison Company (Edison) adjacent to their Etiwanda steam generating plant Edison will provide NSR with a license for interim use of its property for the purposes oudined above. NSR operates a number of scrap collection yards in the Midwest and southern United States. The property is served by the Santa Fe Railroad and accessible by Sixth Street off of Etiwanda Avenue. This yard will receive finished goods from NSS plants which will be transloaded for shipment to customers in the southern California and northern Mexico region. Scrap will be received at the site from scrap processing yards in the same area and loaded onto rail cars or trucks for shipment to regional scrap consumers. Some scrap may need to be cut to usable lengths at the site using portable or stationary shears to facilitate rail or truck transpor~ Other loose scrap, appliances or car bodies may be compressed into bundles to create a denser scrap form for shipment from the site. The finished goods received at the Yard will be bundled, or coiled steel, ready for customer shipmen~ It is anticipated that most finished goods will be shipped from the Yard to customers within sevent~-t~vo hours, yet it is possible for some finished goods inventory to be maintained at the Yard. YARD CDNC~EPT As designed, the Yard would be laid out to separate finished goods unloading, scrap handling and scrap loading to ensure orderly vehicular movement on the property. Rail tracks and roads will smoothly integrate off and on-loading of railcars and trucks. Intermodal truck and rail activities would also be possible at the Yard. The Yard is designed to handle rail shipments of finished goods into the yard, and rail shipments of scrap out of the yard. Activity flow into and out of the yard is estimated to be five rail cars per day during 1996. To support this volume, roughly twenty trucks per day will EXHIBIT "A" PROJECT DESCRIPTION deliver scrap and twenty trucks will pickup finished goods. In years 1997 and beyond, this volume could approach ten to fifteen cars per day, depending on finished product and scrap metal markets. Coiled steel and bundled rounds and reinforcing bar are the finished products to be handled. Bundles of round steel products will weigh a minimum of one ton, yet could weigh as much as five tons. Coils will weigh between one and three tons. The finished steel will be unloaded, staged and reloaded onto trucks for shipment in California and Northern Mexico. Ferrous scrap metal will be delivered to the Yard by local scrap collection yards. The scrap will consist of societal discards to be recycled. It is anticipated that much of the scrap steel will already have been processed (sorted, cut to usable lengths or compacted). Scrap metal will be received, sheared or compacted if necessary, then staged and loaded onto outbound railcars or trucks as they become available. No hazardous materials will be handled at the site. Automated radioactive monitoring along with visual and other inspection procedures will be followed to ensure that no problem materials enter the property. PERCENT OF STORAGE VERSUS DISTRIBUTION OF NEVV PRODUCT All finished steel received and handled at the site is for distribution to identified customers. Product will be staged in rail cars as it awaits truck transportation. It is expected that over ninety-five percent of all product will generally be shipped within twenty-four hours of receipt- PERCENT OF STORAGE VERSUS DISTRIBIJTION OF PRODUCT FOR RECYCLING All scrap metal received for recycling will be distributed within three weeks of receipt. Levels of recycled material on-hand vary depending on railroad car availability and market conditions for scrap metal. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF RAIL CARS ARRIVING DAILY The Santa Fe will switch cars once per day, after I I:00 p.m. and before 5:00 a.m. The maximum number of cars anticipated at full operation is twelve railcars entering and leaving each day. (Each on-site track cannot hold and process more than twelve cars. The maximum number of cars on-site at any time is twenty-four.) Maximum daily arriving rail cars to be unloaded: 12 Maximum daily departing rail cars being unloaded: 1.32 Maximum daily number of stacked railcars on-site 24 WORST CASE "STACKING" REOUIREMENT The City's use of "stacking" is unclear. The finished product handled by this facility does not lend itself to vertically "stacking" due to its size and weight- As indicated, product is received for specific customer delivery, or it will not be sent to this facility. Product must be off-loaded from rail cars directly onto trucks. If trucks are unexpectedly not available, product will remain in rail cars. Alternatively, it could be laid on the ground until the trucks are available, yet double handling of product would reduce operational efficiency and backs up the product flow. On ground stacking is not contemplated and will be avoided to the extent practical. (Due to weight and bulk, bundled and coiled steel products do not lend themselves to vertical stacking above nine feet Coiled steel stacking would also be limited to nine feet_) Worst case on-site product storage is not expected to exceed twenty percent of the produc~ handled. Product will be rerouted to other customers, held by the railroad, or returned to the originating facility. Worst case scrap metal storage would be a continuous pile, not exceeding fifteen feet in height and thirty feet wide at the base, located over the lined area parallel to the working secrjons of rail MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TRUCKS EXPECTED DURING A MAXIMUM DAY FOR FINISHED PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION Each outgoing rail car can carry a maximum of ninety-six tones of outgoing material for recycling. Given that each incoming scrap vehicle carries twenty-four tons of scrap, it will take four trucks to provide enough scrap metal to fill an outgoing railcar. Therefore, the maximum number of incoming loads to fill twelve rail cars with material for recycling is forty-eight each day for a maximum total of ninety-six in/outs. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TRUCKS EXPECTED DURING A MAXIMUM DAY FOR INCOMING MATERIAL TO BE RECYCLFD Each outgoing rail car can carry a maximum of ninety-six tones of outgoing material for recycling. Given that each incoming scrap vehicle carries twenty-four tons of scrap, it will take four trucks to provide enough scrap metal to fill an outgoing railcar. Therefore, the maximum number of incoming loads to fill twelve rail cars with material for recycling is forty-eight each day for a maximum total of ninety-six in/outs. DOUBLE DUTY TRUCK~i THAT DELIVER SCRAP AND LEAVE WITH FINISHED PRODUCT It is estimated that ten percent of trucks bringing scrap will be equipped with drop sides and leave loaded with finished product This will reduce the total number of ins and outs. MAXIMUM TRUCK TRIP~; Outgoing product Forty-eight trucks 96 in/outs Incoming material for recycling. Forty-eight trucks 96 in/outs Dual Purpose Trucks. Nine trucks - 18 in/outs Maximum ....... 174 in/outs I~IUMBER OF TRUCKS IN THE MAXIMUM HOLIR Outgoing trucks will be scheduled to arrive for specific loading times. Trucks will be loaded and unloaded sequentially, or simultaneously depending on equipment availability. The maximum number of trucks handled per hour will be twelve trucks. TIME TO LOAD PER TRUCK It will take a maximum of thirty-five minutes to weight, load, tie-down and manifest furnished product trucks. (Finished product trucks will be on-site for this period of time.) Finished Product Trucks (ou~oing): Arrival Weighting &Load Verification 5 minutes Actual Product Loading &driver tie down 25 minutes Departing Weighing & Verification 1.5 minutes 45 minutes It will take a maximum of twenty minutes to weigh, unload and reweigh incoming trucks carrying materials to be recycled. (Scrap trucks will be on-site for this period of time.) Recyclin_~ Material Trucks (incoming): Arrival Weighing &Load Verification S minutes Product Unloading I 0 minutes Weighing & Departure Verification 5 minute~ 20 minutes WORST CASE ~;TA~IN~ RE0~JIREMENT The "worst case" staging situation for this yard would occur because of unexpected truck shortages. In such a case product would remain on railcars until trucks are available. If the problem persisted, product would be unloaded from the railcars and placed on the ground adjacent and parallel to the railcars, or roadway, to avoid railcar demurrace charges. If the situation persisted, the Santa Fe would be advised not to deliver full railcars to the facility. Product would not be assembled on the ground at the "truck staging area". The designated truck staging area is used for truck waiting and load tie-down purposes, not to accumulate stored product_ Trucks will be loaded along side the rail cars. Reauired PrQvid~d Worst case stacking/staging trucks: 10 trucks/trailers 10 trucks/trailers Staging area requirements: 65' x 12' x I 0 trucks 65' x 18' x I 0 trucks 65' depth by 120' width 65' depth by 8 I' width Staging are contained on site plans: 7800 SF I 1,700 SF RADIATION DETECTION OPERATION Radiation detection equipment is installed at entry point to identify any radioactive materials that may inadvertently, or deliberately be included with materials to be recycled. Although not typically seen, on a rare occasion a piece of radioactive material may be shipped by a scrap dealer. The radiation detectors are present to prevent radioactive materials from entering the property at Rancho Cucamonga. The sensors are placed on each side of the road. Trucks pass between the calibrated detectors, which can detect the presence of radioactive materials. Should radioactive materials be detected, the vehicle and its load are not allowed to remain on the property. ~RKING The operation of the facility will not require overnight or extended truck parking. Trucks arrive to pickup a load or drop off scrap~ and then leave the property. Truck staging areas are for standby parking and load tying. Trucks will be loaded alongside the rail cars as finished product is removed from the train. SITE INFORMATION The property is owned by Edison. It is generally described as a 28 acre portion of APN 0229-283-27. NSR has entered into a property use license agreement with Edison for the herein stated use of the property. The ten year agreement allows for either party to terminate the license upon one year's notice. It is Edison's opinion that the conditional use of this property is covered by Section 66428 of the California Subdivision Map Act under which all transfers and uses of land to or from a public utility are exempt from the parcel map requirements, providing however that such land is not sold by Edison to another party. NSR has conducted preliminary environmental and engineering analyses at the site to determine that it is feasible for the use described herein. These efi~orts have included civil engineering studies, physical and environmental assessments, availability of utilities, identification of zoning requirements and other site studies. It is NSR's opinion that the site is workable for the described use. Edison itself, has placed a requirement on NSR to ensure that the site is restorable to its original condition upon the termination of the license agreement. To accomplish this, Edison is requiring NSR to place a plastic liner under the equipment maintenance area and the area that will be used for scrap metal handling, storing, shearing and compacting. Edison's requirement is not related to any aquifer protection or other local, state or environmental law. It is simply Edison's insistence that the property be easily restorable to its preticense condition. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Insert property description here: The property to be licensed does not have direct access to any public road. Primary access will be near the vicinity of the intersection of Sixth Street and the Santa Fe Railroad spur, approximately one-half mile west of Etiwanda Avenue. Emergency access will be provided approximately one-quarter mile to the east of the primary entrance. FACILITY: The Development Package Site Plan is a site use concept for the facility. This drawing indicates the access to roads, facility locations, employee and truck parking, traffic flow, rail flow, product storage and other appropriate .information. It does accurately reflect the activities and product flows that will be conducted on the site. Site plans and facility layouts will be refined after considering City comments regarding NSR's plans for the facility, providing a workable concept with the City can be developed. EMPLOYEES There will be between three and five employees per shift working at the site. The scrap yard will likely operate for two shifts, while it could operate for three eight hour shifts per day. OPERATIN(~ EOIJIPMENT The yard will use locomotive cranes, portable cranes and other transloading equipment to handle finished goods. Scrap metal will be handled by magnet cranes and front end loaders as appropriate. Equipment maintenance will be conducted on or off-site, depending on the type of maintenance being performed. FUEL STORAGE Diesel fuel for operating equipment will be stored in above ground fuel tank(s). The tank(s) will be constructed to meet all applicable zoning and environmental specifications for such tank(s). On-site fuel storage will be approximately 2,0OO gallons. The tank(s) will be bermed to comply with City and appropriate National Fire Code regulations. Fire protection will be provided as required by the City. WATER AND ~ANITARY REC)!,)IREMENT~ Water usage is modesL Water for dust suppression, domestic and landscape uses will be supplied from municipal sources. Sewering will be by private on-site septic system. TRAFFIC FLOW~ Vehicular volumes are consistent with established City zoning and traffic flows on Etiwanda and Sixth StreeL Vehicular traffic would enter and leave the property via Sixth Street. NSR will have an ingress and egress license from Edison to cross their property affronting Sixth Street. Raw materials for the process will come from industrial scrap collectors and automobile shredders in the Los Angeles area. The delivery routes of travel for finished goods and raw materials are e×pected to be Etiwanda Avenue to Interstate Ten, or San Bernardino Avenue to Interstate Fifteen. Scrap will be obtained from suppliers in the immediate area, Colton and other nearby scrap processors. Gravel, gravel substitute, or oil covered aggregate roads and rail beds will be established on the site. Dust suppression, consistent with local requirements will be used to mitigate dust from vehicular traffic. BUILDINGS The Yard will include temporary modular trailers for office, lunch room and domestic facilities. Permanent buildings are not contemplated. Electric utility lines to the trailers will be underground from the nearest Edison service lines. Sewering will be by on-site septic system. The planned use of the site is consistent with the existing Air Quality requirements as defined by the City for this industrial area. The site is adjacent Etiwanda Steam Plant, Tamco Steel Mill and large industrial warehousing and trucking operations on Sixth Street. The property is bounded by vacant land to the west CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY - PART II BACKGROUND 2) Related File(s): 3) Applicant: fV'~2/'ZT'M' ~ Address: /~'xtO7 /I//l~ ~l,,4/T~I i~,,'t-'D...////,A/,f/~?,d ///~ , M//v'/Y~,;F~ ~"~' ~'~/ Telephone #: ~ I Z./7./-'~ · ' 5) Project Accepted as Complete (date): ///'~ 2-/~,~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, explanation of the4 potential impacts identified as "Yes" or "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheets. An explanation shall also be provided 'i~ each instance where a potentially significant effect has been determined not to be significant and is marked "No." Yes Maybe No I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in the geologic structure?Q Q ,,~ b) Disruptions, displacement, compaction or over covering of the soil? c) Change in the topography or ground surface relief features? El El ,.~ d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? E3 El e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? El ~ El f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sand, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?ElQ g) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? El El /,~ Yes Maybe No AIR. Will the proposal result in: a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Q ~ Q b) The creation of objectionable odors? El El c) Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Q Q III. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, orthe course of direction ofwatermovements, in either marine or fresh waters? Q El b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Q ~ Q c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Q Q .,~ d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any body? Q El e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? El El f) Alteration of the direction or rate of ground waters? Q El g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? El El h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water other,vise available for public-water supplies? El El i) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal pools? El El IV. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered : species of plants? El El c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Q Q ,.~ d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Q El V. ANIMAL LIFE. Willtheproposalresultin: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of I animals (birds; land animals, including reptiles; fish and shellfish; benthic organisms or insects)? El El ,,~ b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species or animals? Yes Maybe No c) Introduction of new species of animals into the area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Q n d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? El Q VI. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? El J~ Q b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? El ,1~ El VII. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal.' a) Produce new light and glare? El ~ El VIII. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in: a) Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? El Q .,~ IX. ' NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Q D X. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a) A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? El ,~ b) ' PossibI~'interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? El [::3 XI. POPULATION. Will the proposal: a) Alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? n El XII. HOUSING. Will the proposal.' a) Affect existing housing, orcreate a demand foradditional housing?Q Q .,~ Xlll. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? El ~ El b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?ElEl c) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? El ~ El d) Alterations to the present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? El El e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? El El f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or Yes Maybe No XIV. PUBLICSERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas.' a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? · d) Parks and other recreational facilities? e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f) Other governmental services? XV. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? XVI. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) . Water? .-.-- d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? XVII. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (exclud- ing mental health)? b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? XVIII. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in: a) The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? b) Creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? XIX. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in: a) Impact upon the quality of existing recreational opportunities? b) Restrict the religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Yes Maybe No XX. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal.' a) Result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? Q Q I~ b) Result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Q Q ~ c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Q Q ,~ XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant oF animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Q b) Shod-term: Does the project have the potential to achieve shod- term, to the~,'~dvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A shod-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definite period of time. Long-term impacts will endure W,_ell into the future.) Q c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect on the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) Q d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Q XXII. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. (Attach additional sheets with narrative description of the environmental impacts.) Xlll. DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS. (Attach additional sheets examining whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls.) XXIV. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program El R, or other C EQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier E IR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on th~ eaErl[er analysis. ' ....... c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "less than Significant with Mitigation Incorpo- rated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. On the basis of this initial evaluation: a) I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared .............................. Q b) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared .............................. El c) I find the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required ......................... CI Date Preparer's Signature XXVI. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION (To be completed by applicant.) I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Date Signature Print Name and Title ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKI,IST Initial Study - Part II Environmental Evaluation and Discussion Project Description: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL COMPANY - A re_quest to construct a scrap steel recycling facility and finish steel distribution center on a 29.26 acre lease site in the heavy industrial area (Subarea 15) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan generally located north of 6th street, south of the Metrolink right-of-way, and west of Etiwanda Avenue: APN: 229-283-27. I. Earth: a) A study is on file: "Geotechnical Investigation for North Star Steel Co., Parcel N/o 6th Street and W/o Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, January 12, 1996." The site is not within any known unstable earth condition area. b) The project will process, store, and load scrap metal; store and distribute finished steel products; and maintain equipment on the site out-of-doors. Although no hazardous materials are anticipated as part of the scrap operation, plastic liners will placed over soil in the aforementioned areas to avoid any potential of contamination. Further, in order to avoid soil contamination, the following will not be accepted on site: automotive engines, automotive transmissions, or any metal wastes contaminated with hazardous fluids or materials. No dismantling operations will occur on site. Diesel fuel is proposed to be stored in an above ground storage tank which will be installed to comply with the California Above Ground Storage Act requirements and requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. There will be an office footprint of approximately 1200 square feet, as well drive aisles and parking pavements. Site coverage is consistent with industrial development expected in the area. The impact is not significant. c) The topography of the site will be altered slightly to accommodate the project, including construction of a berm to screen the operations. The grading will be conducted consistent with City codes. The impact is not significant. d) No known or unique geologic or physical features exist on this site. e) The project is within a soil conservation area. Consistent with SCAQMD (Rule 403), dust suppression techniques will be used so that fugitive dust does not remain visible beyond the property line of the project. Also, consistent with City standards and conditions of approval prior to occupancy, the site shall be landscaped and/or paved to prevent soil erosion per City standards and conditions of approval. The impact is not significant. f) The project will not affect any river, channel, ocean, lake, or bay. g) The project is not within any known seismic special study zone nor subject to any known geologic hazard. No additional studies are required. II. Air: a) The project is within a soil conservation area. Short term construction activities will disturb the soil. Consistent with SCAQMD (Rule 403), dust suppression techniques will be used so that fugitive dust does not remain visible beyond the property line of ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II CUP 95-37 Page 2 the project. Long term, consistent with City standards and conditions of approval, prior to occupancy the site shall be landscaped and/or paved to prevent soil erosion per City standards and Conditions of approval. Also, the project will serve primarily as a transfer station for scrap and new products. Only pre-sorted metal scrap will be received on site which will then be compacted, bundled, and cut to size. No on-site fabric shredding or scrap processing which could generate particulate emissions will occur. Further, on-site roads, truck loading areas, employee and guest parking areas, truck staging areas, and maintenance areas shall be paved with asphalt paving or oil treated slag. Gravel shall not be permitted for the aforementioned areas. The impact is not significant. b) The project will not create any objectionable odors. c) The project will not result in alteration to the climate or air movement. III. Water: a) There are no marine or fresh water courses on site. b) A study is on file: "Final Drainage Report: North Star Steel: CUP 95-37, January 1996." The absorption rate may be slightly altered because of the paving and hardscape proposed. Storm flows received in the lined and bermed containment areas will be drained through sand and gravel to a storm water control box, then filtered and released to the ground approximately 1,500 feet from the public right-of-way. Surface storm water flows will be conveyed to approved drainage facilities consistent with City codes and policies. The impact is not significant. c) The project will not alter the course or flow of flood waters. d) The project will not affect the amount of surface water in any body. e) The project will not be discharging into any surface waters. f) The proposed hardscape and lined storage areas are not expected to result in any alteration of groundwater. g) No direct additions or withdrawals of ground water are proposed. h) The project is anticipated to use only that amount of water consistent with dust avoidance during construction and with a storage and distribution facility upon project completion. The amount of water usage is not significant. i) There are no special flood hazard areas within or near the site. IV. Plant Life: a) The site has been an Southem Califomia Edison steam generation plant expansion area since 1951. The project will remove existing vegetation on the site which consists of weedy disturbed areas and remnant vineyards. There will be no impact on diversity of species. b) There are no known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) Consistent with City codes and the Industrial Area Specific Plan, landscaping introduced to the site will be compatible with landscaping materials used on nearby projects in the Industrial area and throughout the City. There will be no impact to native species. d) Remnant vineyards exist on the site. Old vines will be removed, but because the site has not been fanned since 1951, there will be no reduction of agricultural acreage. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT iNITIAL STUDY - PART II CUP 95-37 Page 3 V. Animal Life: a) The site has been an SCE steam generation plant expansion area since 1951. There are no known animals that currently occupy the site on a regular basis. b) There are no known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. Similar disturbed sites in the area have been surveyed for Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly, including a 27.45 acre site on the southwest comer of Etiwanda Avenue and Sixth Slxeet; a 150 acre site bounded by the AT&SF railroad, Fourth Street, Milliken Avenue, and Utica Avenue; and the 11 acre site for the Milliken Avenue extension between the AT&SF Railroad and Foothill Boulevard. No evidence of the fly has been found on any sites surveyed within Rancho Cucamonga. c) No new species will be introduced as a result of the project. d) The project is .surrounded on the north by the Metrolink right-of-way and developed heavy industrial uses, on the south by developed heavy industrial uses, on the east by developed industrial uses, and on the west by a railroad spur line and vacant land zoned for heavy industrial use. The project will have no impact on fish or wildlife habitat. VI. Noise: a) The site is currently vacant. It is bisected by a rail spur, which is used by SCE for deliveries of fuel oil for the steam generating plant. The site adjoins the Metrolink track. Nearby facilities include a steel processing plant, a scrap processing plant, and the I-15 Freeway. No increase in existing noise level is anticipated. b) The development of the facility will generate noise in the 80-110 Db range. Noise generating machinery will be placed more than 1,500 feet from the public fight-of-way. Consistent with City codes and the Industrial Area Specific Plan, noise levels will not exceed 85 Ldn at the property line. VII. Light and Glare: a) New light and glare will be created because the property is currently vacant. Consistent with City codes and the Industrial Specific Plan, a condition of approval will require the applicant to submit a lighting plan for review and approval to ensure the light does not spill over on to adjacent properties. The impact is not significant. VIII. Land Use: a) No land use alteration is proposed with the application. The site is identified as Heavy Industrial in the General Plan. "Scrap operation" is a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Heavy Industrial area of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 15). Therefore, the project is consistent with the present and planned land use of the area. IX. Natural ResourceS: a) The project will recycle steel; therefore, it is expected to have a positive impact on conservation of resources. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II CUP 95-37 Page 4 X. Risk of Upset: a) Diesel fuel will be stored in an above ground tank with secondary containment in an area surrounded by a berm and with the underlying soil protected from potential leaks or spills by a plastic liner. Fuel storage facilities will be constructed, maintained, and operated to be consistent with all applicable codes of the City and the Fire District. There will be no significant impact. b) Two means of emergency access will be maintained consistent with all applicable codes of the City and the Fire District: the primary access will be from Sixth Sweet and a secondary access on an existing road across the SCE property to Etiwanda will be maintained. There will be no significant impact. XI. Population: a) The maximum number of employees will be 22. The project will have no impact on the population of the City. XII. Housing: a) The maximum number of employees will be 22. The project will not create the need for additional housing. XIII. Transnortation: a) The project will generate construction trips. This is not a significant impact. When fully operational the project will generate a maximum of 174 truck trips per day, as well as employee trips. This is below the threshold of significance. b) The site is sufficient in size to provide the parking spaces required by the City code and Industrial Area Specific Plan. c) Street improvements will be made to handle the additional traffic on Sixth Street and there will be no significant impacts. Primary access for the project is Sixth Street. A second emergency access will be maintained through an existing SCE access road from the site to Etiwanda Avenue. A City traffic survey on January 24, 1996, counted 1500 trips for Sixth Street. Sixth Street is currently improved with 26 feet ofpavement and dead ends at the AT&SF railroad spur which parallels the westem project boundary. The Circulation Plan of the General Plan states that ultimately Sixth Street will become a Secondary arterial with freeway access with 88 feet of right-of-way and 64 feet of road pavement. Consistent with City codes and policies, the applicant will be conditioned to dedicate right-of way and complete the north side of Sixth Street fronting APN 229-283-27 to City specifications. d) The project is consistent with existing circulation pattems for the movement of goods. e) The project is rail served. The AT&SF railroad will switch cars once per day, between 11 p.m. and 5 a.m. The site is sufficient in size to provide stacking for 24 rail cars; therefore, a maximum of 24 rail cars will be stacked on site daily. The site and facilities are adequate; therefore, there will be no impact to air, water or rail traffic. f) The project is consistent with the Circulation Plan for the City and the Industrial area and will not increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II CUP 95-37 Page 5 XIV. Public Services: a) The project will require additional permitting and inspection. by the Fire District to ensure Code compliance. The impact is not significant. b) No increase in police services is expected as a result of this project. c) No increase in the number of school pupils is expected as a result of this project. d) The project will have no impact on existing park facilities or result in the need for additional facilities. e) Frontage street improvements will be installed consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The City will maintain all public streets dedicated and installed per City Standards. There is no significant impact. f) No other government services are expected to be affected by this proposal. XV. Energy a) The project is not expected to use substantial mounts of fuel or energy. b) The development is not expected to result in substantial increase on the demand of existing energy sources or the need for new energy sources. XVI. Utilities and Service Systems: a) The project will not result in the need for new power or natural gas systems. b) The project will not result in the need for new communication systems. c) The project will use water readily available to the SCE site. d) Restroom and shower facilities will be provided and drain to an on-site septic system built to conform to City codes. e) Additional storm water drainage can be accommodated by a new on-site project which will convey waters to existing, acceptable storm drain facilities consistent with City codes and policies. The impact is not significant. f) No significant solid waste disposal will be necessary to serve the site. XVII. Human Health: a) The project is not expected to create any health hazard. b) No exposure of people to potential health hazards is expected. XVIII. Aesthetics: a) The project will not obstruct any view or vista currently available to the public. b) Scrap recycling is a permitted on this site subject to a Conditional Use Permit. Scrap piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height and shall be fully screened from public view by a combination of benn, solid wall, and landscaping consistent with City codes and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. XIX. Recreation: a) No existing recreational facilities will be impacted by the project. b) No known religious or sacred uses are presently conducted on-site. XX. Cultural Resources: a) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. c, gs' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY - PART II CUP 95-37 Page 6 b) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. c) The project should not impact any unique ethnic cultural values. XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance: a) No known animal or wildlife species are expected to be substantially adversely impacted by the project. b) There are no known long-term environmental impacts that are expected to occur as a result of the project. c) It is not anticipated that the cumulative impacts of the project will have a substantial impact as a result of the project. d) It is not anticipated that the project will have any adverse impacts on human beings. XXII. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation. Discussion has been incorporated into items above. XXIII. Discussion of Land Use Impacts. The site is identified as Heavy Industrial in the General Plan. The project is a conditionally permitted use in the Heavy Industrial area of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. With conditions, the project will be consistent with City codes and the Industrial Area Specific Plan and there will be no significant land use impacts. XXIV. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation measures described herein have been added to the project; therefore, A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signatti~r "' ' Prini name l City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division ~7'~. ~,"'D4~_( Date Signature Print Name Applicant Date RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-37 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SCRAP STEEL RECYCLING FACILITY AND FINISH STEEL DISTRIBUTION CENTER LOCATED IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 15) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-287-27. A. Recitals. 1. Nodh Star Steel Company has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-37, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of February 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on February 28, 1996, including wdtten and oral staff repods, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 29.26 acre interior license/lease site with an access frontage of approximately 140 feet on 6th Street and an interior lot width of approximately 1,190 feet and lot depth of approximately 880 feet, and is presently primarily vacant but bisected by an abandoned rail spur, and b. The primary site is an approximately 221 acre parcel located north of 6th Street and west of Etiwanda Avenue improved with a power generation facility, and c. The properly to the north of the subject site is Metrolink right-of-way and heavy industrial use improved with heavy manufacturing facilities, the property to the south is Heavy Industrial with a portion vacant and a portion improved with distribution facilities, the property to the east is Heavy Industrial with a portion improved, a portion vacant, and a podion unimproved and in County unincorporated territory. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan. the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL CO. February 28, 1996 Page 2 b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended. and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, furlher, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole. the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Furlher, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration. the staff repods and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fodh in paragraphs 1, 2, 3. and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set fodh below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) This approval is for a scrap steel recycling facility, finished steel distribution center, and related improvements on a 29.26 acre lease site. 2) Scrap piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height and shall be screened from public view from the Metrolink corddor and from 6th Street by a combination of ben'n, solid wall, solid gates, and landscaping consistent with the Development Code, the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and approved landscape plans, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3) The maximum number of employees shall be 22 per day; the maximum shift shall be 12 persons. 4)The maximum number of truck trips shall be 174 during any 24 hour period. ·; 5) To provide for truck queuing, the primary access gate shall be located approximately 100 feet nodh of the 6th Street right-of-way. It shall be constructed of solid, view obscuring materials. To provide access for PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL CO. February 28, 1996 Page 3 Southern California Edison maintenance vehicles, a second view obscuring gate with a drive approach shall be provided along the 6th Street frontage. 6) Fences over 3 feet in height along 6th Street shall be subject to the 45- foot setback, as measured from ultimate curb face, per Industrial Area Specific Plan requirements. 7) Screen nodheast comer of lease site with dense landscaping extending approximately 200 feet eastward on Southern California Edison property mixing plant material to match existing on Southern California Edison site and to match new planting, including trees, along lease site. 8) Any substantial change in operations or conditions of approval shall require review by the City Planner and may require revision of the Conditional Use Permit. Enqineerinq Division 1) Complete the north half of 6th Street fronting the parcel on which the project is located. For the podion of 6th Street where improvements already exist on the south side, new AC pavement shall join the existing pavement resulting in a finished width of 64 feet. A 32-foot half section can extend west of the current south half terminus, to the railroad spur, with a transition to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement for costs in excess of, the Transpodation Development Fee in conformance with City policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2) A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all street lights during the first six months of operation, prior to building permit issuance. 3) Extend a storm drain to the nodh side of future 6th Street improvements at the existing sump catch basin, approximately 400 feet east of the project east boundary. Install temporary facilities to desall pdvate runoff being concentrated at this point before it enters the public facility, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4) The project ddveway on 6th Street will need to be located about 35 feet east, so that the near edge of the project driveway is at least 150 feet from the centerline of the railroad spur if the applicant wishes to retain left turn capability when 6th Street is extended and an at-grade crossing is installed for the railroad spur. 5) An agreement by Southern California Edison to allow emergency access to Etiwanda Avenue across their adjacent property shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. Buildinq and Safety Division 1) Submit detailed and scaled Site Plan for building permits which shall indicate access points, all scrap pile locations, and all building PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL CO. ' February 28, 1996 Page 4 structures and their uses, and shall be to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall. 2) For emergency access purposes, primary and secondary access roads shall be all-weather construction to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall. 3) All on-site above-ground tanks must comply to the 1991 Uniform Fire Code and are limited in size and commodity in accordance with adopted Rancho Cucamonga Fire District ordinances. 4) On-site fire hydrants shall be required to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall. 5) Where the truck ddve aisle passes over the Metropolitan Water District pipeline, the roadway shall be constructed to provide adequate protection for the pipeline to the satisfaction of Metropolitan Water Distdct and to be verified by the City Building Official prior to issuance of grading permits. 6) Where the truck ddve aisle passes over the Southern California Edison oil pipeline. the roadway shall be constructed to provide adequate protection for the pipeline to the satisfaction of Southern California Edison and to be verified by the City Building Official prior to issuance of building permits. Environmental Mitigation Measures 1) In order to prevent fugitive dust emissions, all drive aisles and parking areas shall be paved with asphalt/concrete or oil treated crushed aggregate consistent with approved plans and to the satisfaction of the City Planner, and shall be cleaned regularly consistent with a schedule approved by the City Planner prior to occupancy and maintained in sound condition to the satisfaction of the Building Official. 2) Consistent with the performance standards for the district, noise levels shall not exceed 85 Ldn at the property line. Noise generating operations shall be designed and operated to meet the aforementioned standard to the satisfaction of the City Planner and maintained to the satisfaction of the Building Official. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3) Where there is a potential for soil contamination, including but not limited to the site of the above-ground storage tank and the site of scrap storage, the areas shall be lined with plastic. prior to occupancy, consistent with approved technology for soil protection, and consistent with approved plans and to the satisfaction of the property owner (Southern California Edison) and to the City Planner and shall be maintained in a sound condition to prevent leaks and spills to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall. 4) In order to prevent soil contamination, the applicant shall not accept automotive engine, automotive transmissions, or other metal wastes contaminated with hazardous fluids or materials. No dismantling operations shall occur on-site. The applicant shall submit a Management Plan for City Planner approval prior to occupancy. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 95-37 - NORTH STAR STEEL CO. February 28. 1996 Page 5 5) In order to prevent particulate emissions, the applicant shall accept pre-sorted metal scrap which will be compacted, bundled, and cut to size on-site and shall not engage in sorting and shredding operations on-site which would generate particulate emissions. The applicant shall submit a Management Plan for City Planner approval prior to occupancy. 6) The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries: a Soil Disturbance Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at (909) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City Building Official prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 7) Hydroseeded ground cover served by an automatic irrigation system shall be provided to prevent soil erosion in all graded areas. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. Santa Ann Reqional Water Quality Control Board 1) All applicable permits must be obtained from the Regional Water Quality Control Board: evidence of permitting shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall cedify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: c5'/ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN'ill STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items chewed APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ,. : Time Lira Completion Dale roval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ---/ / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the dale of approval· 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / , _...j / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of .__/ / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to ~ all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes .__/___/ first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District lot the ConStruction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes lirst. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior lo the recordalion of the final map or issuance ·; of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SO- 10/94 I This condition shall be waived il the Oity receives notice that the applicant and all alfected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school V~6. impacts as a result of this project. Prior to recordalton of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is J / involved, written cedification from the affected water district that adequ ate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted To the Department of Community Development. Such leffer must have been issued by the wafer district within 90 days prior to final map approval in t he case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B, Site De lopmerit ~The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which ._._J / include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and r~t~~Specific Plan and Planned Community. L/'~2. P ' rior to any. u~se of the project site .or business activily being .commenced thereon, all .J___/ X Conditions of Approval shall be complete~ to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefacilityshallnotcommenceuntilsuchlimeasallUniformBuildingCodeand State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancbd Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected tor compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /.__/ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. b"/5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated tor /----J consistency pdorlo issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in lhe case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development __/ / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific -/'Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and ---J / Sheritf's Department (989-6611 ) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized Irash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units._._/ / with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, __/ / andthe number of trash receptacles shallbe subjectto City Planner review and approval 110prior to issuance of building permits. · All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall __..J / be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. c_,,5'3 SC * ].0/94 2 Proiect No,: CUP Completion pate: 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with _.j / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. b//1'12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and __/ / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation ot the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine ._J / animalswhere zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. .15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _J / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They.shall be recorded ConcUr.rg.ntly.with the Final Map or prior to the i~s[~ance of building permits, whichever occurs firel. A recorded copy shall be provided Io the City Engineer. 16.A~~parkways~~penareas~and~andscapingsha~~bepermanent~ymaintainedbyt~eproperty ._J / owner, homeowners" association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of This landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or J / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system· The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with The recordalton of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and / / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further rnoditications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exteriorof the buildings or structures. removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C, Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units /.~J and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shall have the fron~, side and rear elevations Upgraded with architectural / / treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. SC- 10/94 3 Proi~ct ~o.: Carl ~.~ 3 7 Comt~letion Date: 3. Standard patio cover plans tot use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for /___/ ity Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. J4. AII roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or 5 / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent pmpedies and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) ,--v/'/~l. AII parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall .___/ / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be -J / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ C3. Aazas/recreational uses. . II parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, .J / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall i:;e provided with garage door openers if dfivewa~i'are less t'han 18 feet in -J / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles ----/ / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation lor the owner and prohibit on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and /~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, referto Section N.) v'/~l.A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- /---J ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier J / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof__treespergrossacre,comprisedofthefollowingsizes.shallbeprovided J /--- within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - ._J / //f5. j,/-inch box or larger. ithin parking lots. trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three J / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC- 10/94 4 Fees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one ComoleLion Date: tree per 30 linear feet ot building. ~ / / All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than .__/ / 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. il. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vedical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy· 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- -J / ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied bythe buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units. an inspection shall be con_du_cted by the Planning Div!sion to determine that .they are .in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- __/ / sible for lhe continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within 1he public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / / · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be __J / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees. meander- .~/ / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along v/"114. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on J /.~ the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, .__J / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division· 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and .~J / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteda shall encourage the natural ,_growth characteristics of the selected tree species· 7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of ----/ / · ~ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. C ""6 SC- ],0/94 5 Proi~, No. CD P ~'3 7 Comt, ledon Date: F. Signs 1. Thesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartofthisapproval. ---J / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and ----/ / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes .--J / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock .__/ / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted -.--/ / Special Stud!e_s Zone for the Red Hill Fau!t, in a standard format ~s determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway __/ / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. __ 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitled for City Planner review and approval prior to the /_._._/ issuance of building permits. The final repod shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below45CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and it appropriate, veri~y the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies v/'/1. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire 5 / Protection District Standards. ~'~2. EmergencyaccessshaIIbeprovided, maintenance free and clear, a minimumof26feetwide ---/ / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection l//~District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be 5 / submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. V'~4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and .__/ / location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. __ 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all 5 / supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. c, d7 SC - 10/94 6 Pro~ect No,: ~-U/O t~,~'3 7 Completion Dale: APPtJCANTS SHAkk CONTACT THE BUII_DING AND SAFETY DIV[SION, (909) 989-1863, FOE COMPUANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development V~l. The applicant shall comply w th the atest adopted Uniform Building Code. Uniform Mechani- ---J / cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition / / to existing un if(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fee s may include. but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or / / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Sireeta re sshallbeprovidedbythe uildingOfficia~affertract/parcel aprecordation __/ / and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances __/ / considering use, area. and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for --J / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage d sposa facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the __J / Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for ___/ / building permit application. K. Grading : v/"'l. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City '---/ / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in V//./ substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ---J / perform such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance ._-/ / Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance ol rough grading permit. L"/'/"4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at / / b//,-..- the time of application for grading plan check. 5. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved priorto issuance of building permits. / / SC- 10/94 7 6. As a custom-lit subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing com01etion of a[! on-site ----/----/ drainage facilities necessary for alewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of'the Building and Safety Division prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading .and building permits. c. On-sile drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided ----/ / properties, are to be installed pdor to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage fliws entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety ---J / Division for approval prior to issuance of bu tiding and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or COmposite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses J---J or planted with ground COver for erosion control upon completion of grading or so me other alternative method of erosion COntrol shall be COmpleted to the satisfaction of the Building Offic.ial. I9 _addition a permanent ir~'igation system shall be pr_ovided. 'Fnis requirement does not release the applicant/develiper lmm COmpliance with the slipe planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 I ol the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909)eFOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Dedication and Vehicular Acces~ 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all intedor public streets --/ / COmmunity trailS, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage lacililies as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facRities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.} shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets ---/ / (measured from street centedine): total feet on total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made --..J / tot all private streets or ddves. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: .__/ / ~ 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensudng access to all parcels by CC&Rs __/ / or by deeds and shall be reCOrded COncurrently with the map or pdor to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. 6. Private drainage easements forcross-jot drainage shall be provided and shall he"delineated Com~lcuon D~tc: or noted on the final map. ---J / 7. The final map shah clearly delineate a I 0-loot minimum buiid.ing restriction a[ea on the __/J neighboring 10t adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the lollowing language: "l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the fight to prohibit the constructk~n of (res~ential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas. · A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. __ 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on ._J.__J the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way J / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto pdvate propeR'/. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along dght turn lanes. to provide a minimum J / of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. ff curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane. a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property inteiests __J / necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do .so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete Ihe improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the deveiopar. at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street Improvements 1. All p~jblic improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, .__/ / landscaped areas. etc.) shown on the plans and/or lentalive map shall be const~cted to Cify Slandards. Interidr slreet improvements shall include, bet are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement. drive approaches. sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum o126- loot wide pavement. within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be .___/ / constructed for all half-section streets. V/ 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, bet not limited to: .__/ / ,/,/ v/ v/v, Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pa'~ement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. /'e'~ C.r~...~, ~'x.0 ,~,-,'~V'~,L ~ 5'TT~ I~J - C...- · , ~ # r 4. Improvement plans and construclion: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- J / feted Civil Engineer, shall be subm~ed to and ap~mved by the City Engineer. Security shall be I:x~sted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Atlorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improve- me nts, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pedormed in bub[ic right-of-way, tees shall be paid and a -.--/ / construction permit shall be obtained from the C/ty Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit _.J / shall be installed to the satisfaclion of the City Engineer. d. Signalconduitwithpullbexesshaitbeinstalledonanynewconstn.~ctionorreconstruction .__/___J of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other me)or, secondary or collector streets for Mure traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BC R, EC R or any ether locations appmved by the City Engineer. Notes: .__/ / (1) AJI pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City "/ / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construclion shall remain open to traffic at all times with ---/ / adequate dot.ours dudng construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall net cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be . .__/ / installed to City Standards, exce~ lot single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. .__/ / i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner p,"ior to submittal for first plan check. J / 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for .--/ / review and approval by the Cit-/Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on the pri- vate streets, tees shall be paid and construcllon permits shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addilion to any other permits required. ~/' 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15*gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program. F 7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. __J / a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sighl shall be plotted for all project intersections, --J-- including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other; obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street irrtersectlons shall have their noticeability improved, usually by .__/ / moving the 2 +/- close st street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easer'l~ent. .8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: ._J / 9. All public improvements on the following streels shall be operationally complete pdor to the ----/ / issuance of building permits: N, Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards J / shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval pdor to final map approval or issuance of--building permits, whichever occurs flint. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2. Asignedconsentandwaiverfon'ntojoinand/orformtheappropdateLandscabeandLigh'ling _.J.__ __ Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pdorto final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the developer. 3. AIIrequiredpubliclandscapingandirrigatlonsysterns shallbecontinuouslymaintainedbythe _.-/ / developer until accepted by the City. · 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective .__/ / Beautiticatlon MasZter Plan: O, Drelnage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood -.-./ / protection measures shall be Ixovided as certitied by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone .__/ / designation removed from the project area, The developers engineer shall prepare .all necessary reports, plans, and hydroldgic/hydraulic calculations, A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map aperoyal or issuance of building ben'nits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOM R) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occ~pency or improverr'~nf acceptance, whichever occurs first. V 3, A final drainage study shall be submitled to and a4:~"oved by the City Engineer prior to final / / map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4. A permi~ from the County Fbod Control Distrio1 is required for work wilhin itsright-of-way. _J. / 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any pubtic.storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. __J /~_ .6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to canvey averflows in the event of a --/ / bloc~age in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each pamel including sanitary sewerage system, water, .._.J / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Slandards. Easements shall be provided as required. V/ 2. The developer shall be responsible for lhe relocation of existing utilities as necessary. ___/ / 3.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ---/ / Cucamanga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. and the Environmental Heallh Oepar~menl of the County of San Bernardinc. A letter of compliance Irom the CCWD is required pdor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General RequlremenLs and Approvals .... 1. The separate parcels contained within the projet1 boundaries shall be legally combined into J / one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. .2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or ---/ / issuance of buiiding permits, whichever occurs first, for: .__J / 3.Prior to approval of the final map a depos~ shall be posted with the City covedng the estimated Cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District. among the newly ~eated parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, SeCondary Regional, and Master Plan .__/ / Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to I:xjilding permit issuance if no map is involved. .5. Permits.shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: __/.__/ 6. A signed Consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Entorcement Comrrunity __/ / Facilities Distri~ stiall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of i::xjilding permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Phor to finalization of any developmen1 phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be corn- .__/ / pie led beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protect. ion to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall COrrespond to lot lines shown on the ap~roved tentalNe map. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 987-6405, FOR COMPLIANCE E FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: __/~_.:__1. Melio Roos Community Facilities Dislric-'l requirements shall apply to this projecl. / / 2. Fire flow requirement shall be .~000 gallons per minute. __/ / A. A previous fire flow, conducted revealed gpm available at 20 psi. "~B. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire departmenl personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. "'~3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed ---J / and operahie prior to delivery of any combustible but Iding mated also n site (i .e., lumbe r, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire depadment personnel 7< 4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided priorto water plan approval. Required hydrants, __/ / if any, will be determined by this department. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" gullet. Substandard hydrants shaft be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. x'~. 5. Prior to the iss.uance of bud ng permits for combustible construction,evidence shall be .__J / su bmitted to the Fire Distdct that temporary water supply for fire protection is avaitabl e, pending completion of required fire protection system. .~..,~6. Hydrant refleclive markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydranls and installed prior to --J / final inspection. 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: ---/ / Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dislrict Ordinance 15. Other Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacuring, spray painting, fiammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Conlast Fire Safety Division to determine it sprinkler system is adequale for proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion ---/ / ot sprinkler system. : 9. A fire alarm syslem(s) shall be required as noted below: --J / Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. California Code Regulations Title 24. NFPA 101. Other ._._._~10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Distdcrs fire lane standards, as noted: ---/ / %. All roadways. Other ...... 11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. 12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. -J / 14. All trees planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so --J / as not to impede fire apparatus. 15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: ---J / Lighted director within 20 feet of main entrance(s). Standard Directory in main lobby. Olher details and orderjng information. . ..... 17. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire. __./ / Safety Division for specific details and ordering information, 18. A tenant use letter shall be subm~ed prior Io final building plan approval. J / , .P.ancheck,eesin ., %mo o,$havebe .pald. An additional $ , shall be paid; Prior to waler plan approval. _Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire proleclion systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. "'~__20. Special permits may be required. depending on intended use, as noted below: .--J / A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgemerit of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. B. Storage of readily combustible material. C. Places of assembly (except churches, schools and other non-profit organizations) D. Bowling alley and pin refinishing. E. Cellulose Nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin). F. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet. G, Garages Motor vehicle repair (H-4) H. Lumber yards {over 00,000 ard leet>.C, G SC- ]0/94 14 I. Tire rebuilding plants. ."',F,J. Auto wrecking yards. Junk or waste material handling plants. K. Flammable finishes. Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanis, electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder coating and organic peroxides and dual com- ponent coatings (per spray booth). L. Magnesium (more tha 10 pounds per day). M. Oil burning equipment operations. N. Ovens (industrial baking and drying). O. Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 pounts of refrigerant). P. Compressed gases (store, handle or use exceeding 100 cubic feet). Q. Cryogenic fluids (storage. handling or use). R. ' D~sE-producing processes andequipment. "' s. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage, handling or use). T. High piled combustible stock. U. Liquified petroleum gas (store, handle, transpod or use more than 120 gallons). V. Matches (more than 60 Matchman's gross). W. Welding and cutting operations: to conduct welding and/or cutting operations in any occupancy. SC-[0/94 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlVIONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: February 28, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14803 - LEWIS HOMES - Review of the subdivision design, detailed site plan, and building elevations for 43 single family homes on 7.23 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the nodh side of Elm Avenue, east of Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-421-26 and 27. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 6.09 dwelling unit per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: North - Greenway Trail and Single Family Residential; Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) East Elementary school; Terra Vista Planned Community, elementary school West Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community, Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Medium Residential ( 8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium Residential ( 8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential ( 8-14 dwelling units per acre) East Medium Residential ( 8-14 dwelling units per acre) West High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant with an average slope of 3 percent from north to south. A drainage inlet has been installed at the southern portion of the site to accept drainage through the property to the south. The Coyote Canyon Elementary School borders the site on the east side. The Greenway Trail borders the northern portion of the site. ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 'I'F 14803 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 43 single family lots ranging in size from 3,723 to 6,516 square feet with an average lot size of 4,371 square feet. The subdivision is designed with two access points to Elm Avenue. The interior streets are proposed along the north and south property lines with a cul-de-sac in the eastern portion of the site. The northern street will run along the Greenway Trail. The unit mix consists of one single-story floor plan and three two-story floor plans. The single story units are plotted on corner lots, where possible, and paired to provide variation in the streetscape. Under the Tetra Vista Planned Community requirements, single family residential development shall maintain a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet with an average lot size of 5,500. If however. the applicant proposes an "innovative" product type, the minimum and average lot size requirements can be reduced to 3,500 and 4,000 square feet, respectively. The proposals by the applicant are consistent with the "Calais" project located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway. The Calais project was previously recognized by the City as an innovative product and was a Design Award winner in 1989. The units provide low walls at the front of the buildings to provide greater variation along the streetscape and create small courtyard areas within the front yard. The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission continue to consider the units as innovative. B. Desion Review Committee: On January 16. 1996, the Design Review Committee (~.umpp, McNiel, Henderson) reviewed the application. The Committee felt the architectural style maintained the innovative concept originally approved with the Calais project. The Committee felt that the location of "A" Street adjacent to the Greenway Trail was acceptable. The location helped to open up the trail rather than having rear yard fencing. Also, the visibility of the trail provided defensible space with visibility from the units. The Committee recommended approval subject to the realignment of Lots 8 through 12 to take access from Streets "A" and "C." This realignment will require the loss of one lot as indicated on the revised plan provided by the applicant. The attached plans reflect this change. Minutes are attached, (see Exhibit "H"). C. Technical Review Committee: During the Technical Review Committee, two issues for Planning Commission discussion were presented. First, the subdivision design provides pedestrian access to the Greenway Trail from "A' Street. The applicant is not proposing to provide an additional pedestrian access from the cul-de-sac through the park. The applicant is, however, proposing a lot at the cul-de-sac terminus to be maintained by the City. Staff recommends that either a sidewalk connection be provided into the park or the lettered lot be eliminated and ownership and maintenance be given to the property owners of Lots 33 and 34. The developer chose to provide a sidewalk connection as shown on the attached plans. The second issue deals with the public improvements required for the south side of "C" Street. Under normal circumstances, sidewalks would be constructed on both sides of the street. Because a sidewalk will be provided on the north side of the street and no lots are located on the south side of the street, there is not the need for the south sidewalk. Residents from "D" Street can utilize the sidewalk on the north side of the street. The south '~ side of the street is the expansion area for Coyote Canyon Elementary which may include PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14803 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 3 classrooms, administrative offices and parking. Staff is seeking Commission direction on the location of the sidewalk along "C" Street. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed Pad 2 of the Initial Study and determined that the application will have a cumulative impact on traffic within Terra Vista. As mitigation, the project has been conditioned to install traffic signals at the four affected intersections. Therefore, staff is recommending issuance of a mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 14803 through adoption of the attached Resolutions and issue a mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. City Planner BB:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Exhibit "B" Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" Site Plan Exhibit "D" Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" Building Elevations Exhibit "G" initial Study Exhibit "H" Design Review Committee Minutes of January 16, 1996 Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 14803 Resolution of Approval for Design Review for Tentative Tract 14803 SITE UTILIZATION flAP TENTAT I VE TRACT NO. 14803 PARCEL MACHO. 10~95 ~ TRACT NO. 13859 TRACT NO! 13717 / .* LA MISSION PARK DETAILED SITE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. ~4803 ., .~o.~;;,,o ',,, ;~,,,-'R,,,....~.,,,' .............. , , ..~ , .................~ ~,~e ~ ,~ ," ~ ,, , -- ~' ' , " '~ ,, . ~ ~ Z' ...... .L~,.~.... ~.::..L~.:,~ .._ FEATURE LEGEND ..,.,.,..,,.,.,.~,,,..,.,,,.,,..~0/ ~ -ui"""' .......""""""*"' TERRAVISTATRACT14803 ,r~. ~ , TERRA VISTA, CALIFORNIA E~XTERIOR MATERIALS I F~ ___',, '- RIGHTsIDE REAR LEVI'SIDE ENVIRONMF,4TAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I- Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full; INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. GENeRaL INFORMATION Application Number for the project to which this [orm pertains: Project Title: Family Village - Tract 14803 Name & Address of project owner(s): Lewis Development Co. 1156 N. Mountain Ave., P.0. BOx 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: Lewis Development Co. 1156 N. Mountain Ave., P.O. BOx 670 Upland, CA 91785 Centact Person & Address: Gary Luque 1156 N. Mountain Avenue, P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 Telephone Nm~mhe_r: Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): N/A TeLephone Number: N/A J~ ;~ C I T Y o f R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCR/PTION Information indicated by asterisk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. *l) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): North side of Elm Avenue ~Dd west of the CoVote Canvon Elementary School. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 1077-421-26 1077-421-27 *5) Gross Site A~ea (ac/sq. ft.): 7.231 acres Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 6.897 acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): None 8) Include a description of all perm. its which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water, and the County Agricultural Commission for dust control. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of information (i-e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): Topography: 2~ - ~ gentle slope, north to south. Soils: Stable and well drained. Trees: None Flora and Fauna: No remarkable species per the Terra Vista MasterEIR. Existing Structures: None. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): There are no noteworthy features per the Terra Vista Master EIR. Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: There is roadway noise from Elm Avenue and the nearby Coyote Canyon Elementary School parking lot. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use which will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: The single family detached project will comprise 44 units and be built in fou~ phases. The four house plans will be the same as the Seville homes'in Tract 15526, and may be sold from the Seville model complex. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects- Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-fandly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North: sinqle family detached East: Coyote Canyon Elementary School South: future residentia~ - medium h~gh den~t_v West: sinqle family detached 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? NO. 15) Indicate the type of short-term &nd long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses- What methods of sound proofing are proposed? Noise from Tract 14803 will be mainly traffic and cons~st~n~ w~h ~b~ noise that is qenerated in the community. No sQundDroof~nc is proposed. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or .replacements of mature or scenic trees: Not applicable. There no trees. Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: None 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a- Residential (gal/day) 26,400 Peak use (gal/day) 52t800 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. Septic Tank X Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewag~ generation: (see Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 11,880 b. Industrial/Commercial (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PRf~'ECTS 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Minimum: 3,767 sq. ft. Maximum: 6,516 sq. ft. Average: 4,400 sq. ft. Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale u~nits): 21) ~nticipated ranqe of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ 140,000 to S 173,000 Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify hurLbet Of bedrooms by unit type: Plan 483 1 story 3 bedrooms Plan 485 2 story 3 Plan 486 2 story_ 3/4 ~r~m~ * Plan 484 ~ story_ 5/6 Y~drnpm~ * · Plan offers a bedroom or d~n 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: Plan Household Size 48~ 2 485 3 4~ 484 4 24) Indicate the exlseoted n~ber of sohool children who will be residin~ · ,,'ithin the project: Con=act the appropriate S~hool Dis'~ri~ts as in ~tta~i-..m. ent ~: a. Elementary: 15 b. ~un-lor High: 15 c. Senior High: 9 25) Descri~ t~ of use(s) and ~jor f~ctton(s) of co~rcia!, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 27) ind/cate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) · Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the nuzlber of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air Pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): 32) Save the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the Project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the Proposed Project? If so, please indicate their response. ____~1 agencies are abl~ and wi__~lliDq to service the 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB'S; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuel, oils, solvents, and other flanunable liquids and gases. Also, note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known- No. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location Of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief- I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 12/6/95 Signature: J~/~ ~/X// Title: Manaqer of S,oecial Pro~ect ATTACHMENT A Water Usage Average use per day Rasidential Single Fam/ly 600 gal/day Apt/Condo 400 gal/day Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial 3000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 1500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/ac Peak Usag~ For all uses Average use X 2.0 Sewer FlO~B Residential Single F~mgly 270 gal/day Apt/Condos 200 gal/day Ccemercial/IndusT_rial General Commercial 2000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1000-1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2000 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3000 gal/day/ac Source: . Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 9/86 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY - PART II BACKGROUND 1) Project File #/Name: ~//-/'~',~--,,~ 2) Related File(s): 3) Applicant: ~--~'~v'/~' Address: ~ ~ ~:~7~ ,~Z-,~A,'z~/~4 '~/7~',,~' Telephone #: ('~,~_) ~5- 4) Project Description: ¢zl/ SDVGZ~',~4,4//~/V ~,r~ r__P'V ~.~_~ 5) Project Accepted as Complete (date): /~,/~'/q~" ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, explanation of potential impacts identified as "Yes" or "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheets. An explanation shall also be provided 'i~ each instance where a potentially significant effect has been determined not to be significant and is marked "No." Yes Maybe No I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstableearthconditionsorinchangesinthegeologicstructure? E3 Q b) Disruptions, displacement, compaction or over covering of the S("' Q Q soil? c) Change in the topography or ground surface relief features? EZ/' Q Q d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Q Q f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sand, or changes in siltatiOn, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Q Q g) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar ~ Q Q hazards? Yes Maybe No AIR. Will the proposal result in.' a) Substantial ai r emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? Q b) The creation of objectionable odors? Q Q c) Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Q El III. WATER. Wifl the proposal result in.' a) Changesincurrents, orthecourseofdirectionofwatermovements, in either marine or fresh waters? El El b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? El c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? El El d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any body? El El e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface wateF quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? El El f) Alteration of the direction or rate of ground waters? El El g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? El El h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public-water supplies? i) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal pools? Q IV. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered : species of plants? E3 El c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? El El V. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals (birds; land animals, including reptiles; fish and shellfish; benthic organisms or insects)? El El b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species or animals? Yes Maybe No c) introduction of new species of animals into the area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Q El d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? VI. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? E~ Q Q b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? [] Q VII. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal.' a) Produce new light and glare? ~ [] [] VIII. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in.' a) Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? [] Q E1/' IX. ' NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in.' .... a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? [] El El,/' X. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a) A ri~k of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? [] El b) Possibl~'interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? El Q XI. POPULATION. Will the proposal.' a) Alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? [] El XII. HOUSING. Will the proposal.' : a) Affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? [] [] XIII. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? [] Q b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d) Alterations to the present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? [] El e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? [] Q f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or ~edestrians? Yes Maybe No XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, orresultin a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? [::3 b) Police protection? Q El ~'/ c) Schools? [::3 · d) Parks and other recreational facilities? [::3 e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? [::3 [~"/' El f) Other governmental services? [::3 El ~// XV. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? E) El b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? [::3 XVI. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? El [::3 ~// b) Communications systems? [::3 c) · Water? :.~_ Q d) Sewer or septic tanks? Q e) Storm water drainage? El f) Solid waste disposal? [::3 [::3 XVll. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (exclud- ing mental health)? Q rn b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? [::3 E3 XVIII. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in: a) The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public?[::3El b) Creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?[::3 XIX. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in: a) Impact upon the quality of existing recreational opportunities?Q Q b) Restrict the religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Q Yes Maybe No XX. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposak a) Result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? Q Q Ef/ b) Result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Q El c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? El Q XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant oF animal or eliminate impodant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? El El b) Shod-term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definite period of time. Long-term impacts will El/, endure W, ell into the future.) El c) Cumulative:Doestheprojecthaveimpactswhichareindividually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect on the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) El El d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? El XXII. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. (Attach additional sheets with narrative description of the environmental impacts.) (111. DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS. (Attach additional sheets examining whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls.) XXIV. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program El R, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the ea~rl~er analysis. = .... c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "less than Significant with Mitigation Incorpo- rated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. XXV. DETERMINATION. (To be completed by Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: a) 1 find that the proposed project cozzZz~ not have a significant effect on the environment, and A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared .............................. Q b) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation me~s~zres described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared .............................. ~ c) I find the proposed project nz~z~j have a significant effect on the environment, and An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required ......................... El Date Prepare~'~ Signatu~r~ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Initial Study - Part II Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Project Description: TT 14803 - Lewis Homes 44 single family residences on 7.23 acres Located on the N/S of Elm Ave. W/O Spruce Ave I. Earth: a) The site is not within any known unstable earth condition area. b) The site will be graded to accommodate the lots and streets for the proposed subdivision. The grading will be conducted under the supervision of licensed surveyor or registered geologist. The impact is not significant. c) The topography of the site will be altered slightly to accommodate the building pads and streets. The grading will be supervised by a licensed soils engineer or registered geologist to ensure compliance with Building Code requirements. The impact is not significant. d) No known or unique geologic or physical features exist on this site. e) Upon completion, the site will be landscaped and/or paved to prevent soil erosion. f) The subdivision should not affect any oceans, bays, rivers, or lakes. g) The majority of California is susceptible to earthquakes. The project is not within any known special study zone that will require additional studies or that poses a unique hazard. H. Air: a) The number of vehicles anticipated with this development is consistent with the information contained in the Terra Vista ERR.. The resultant air emissions will not have a significant impact on air quality. b) The proposed residential subdivision will not create any objectionable odors. c) The proposed subdivision will not result in alteration to the climate or air movement. rrl'. Water: a) The development of residential lots will not affect the currents or course of water movement. b) The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and harriscape proposed. All waters will be conveyed to approved drainage facilities which have been designed to handle the flows. A Master Plan for drainage was considered as part of the Tetra Vista EIR and the mitigation outlined in the Master Plan will be implemented with the development. The impact is not significant. c) The project will not alter the course or flow of flood waters. d) The development of single family lots will not affect the amount of surface water in , : any body. e) The project will not be dischargingj~>Tg/surface waters. Initial Study Pan 2 Response TT 14803 Page 2 f) No alteration ofgroundwater is expected to occur with this project. g) No direct additions or withdrawals of ground water are proposed. h) The project will be tying into existing facilities which have already been sized in anticipation of this development. The amount of water usage is not significant. i) The project is outside of the established flood plain. IV. Plant Life: a) The site consists of grasses. The diversity of plant life will be altered with the removal of the grasses and the introduction of new plant species. The change is not expected to be significant. b) There are known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) Landscaping introduced to the site will be compatible with existing landscaping material. The plant palette will continue the pattern of existing development in the area. d) No agricultural crops exist on-site. V. Animal Life: a) There are no known animals that currently occupy the site on a regular basis. b) There are no known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) No new species will be introduced as a result of the project. d) The project is located within the interior of the City, surrounded by development. In that no animals currently use the site on a regular basis, the development of homes will have no impact on fish or wildlife habitat. VI. Noise: a) The development of residences will increase the noise level by the mere fact that the property is currently vacant. The level of noise increase, however, is not significant. b) The noise levels will be no greater than the existing noise levels. VII. Light and Glare: a) New light and glare will be created because the property is currently vacant. The amount and type of lighting is residential in nature and illuminates the immediate area. Spillover is not expected. VIII. Land Use: a) No land use alteration is proposed with the application. The homes are permitted within this area and are consistent with the Terra Vista EIR. IX. Natural Resources: a) The number of homes proposed will not significantly increase the rate of natural resource consumption. X. Risk of Upset: a) Single family residences do not typically contain materials of the type of quantities that could lead to an explosion or the release of hazardous materials. Initial Study Part 2 Response TT 14803 Page 3 b) The homes will not interfere with emergency response, XI. Population: a) The project is consistent with the expected population distribution in the area and as anticipated in the Terra Vista EIR. XII. Housings: a) The project will not create the need for additional housing. XI~. Transportation: a) The project will generate new trips because of the new construction. The number of trips is consistent with the Terra Vista El]P, and is accommodated by the existing infrastructure. The impact is insignificant. b) All required parking will be provided by garages. Visitor parking can be accommodated by the on-street parking. c) While the project will not generate significant numbers of trips, the project does have a cumulative negative impact on the transportation network. The intersections of Milliken Avenue and Tetra Vista Parlavay, Milliken Avenue and Church Street, Church Street and Elm Avenue, and Church Street and Spruce Avenue need to be upgraded to handle the added trips. The applicant will be required to improve these intersections by designing and installing traffic signals. d) The project will maintain the existing circulation patterns for the movement of goods. e) The project will not affect air, water, or rail traffic. f) The application is expected to increase the risk of traffic hazards because of the new construction. Pedestrian amenities (sidewalks) will be installed as part of the project. The impact is not significant. XIV. Public Services: a) The Fire Department is currently serving the area. b) No substantial new services are expected with the project. c) The school districts having jurisdiction have notified the City of the current impaction problems. A letter is on file with the City indicating acceptance of the application because of a separate agreement between the applicant and the school district. d) The project will have no impact on existing park facilities or result in the need for additional facilities. e) The site will provide new roads as part of the development. The tract will be annexed into an assessment district and landscape and lighting district to cover the costs of maintenance. The impact is not significant. f) No other government services are expected to be affected by this proposal. XV. Ener~sy a) The project is not expected to use substantial amounts of fuel or energy. b) The development is not expected to result in substantial increase on the demand of existing energy sources or the need for new energy sources. Initial Study Part 2 Response TT 14803 Page 4 XVI. Utilities and Service Systems; a) The facility will not result in the need for power or natural gas systems. b) The facility will not result in the need for new communication systems. c) The facility will use water readily available in Elm Avenue. d) The discharge from the site will be handled by the existing sewer facilities. e) An existing storm drain pipe is provided at the south side of the development to convey drainage to acceptable locations. f) No significant solid waste disposal will be necessary to serve the site. XVIL Human Health; a.) The development is not expected to create any health hazard. b) No exposure of people to potential health hazards is expected. XVIII. Aesthetics; a) The project will not obstruct any view or vista currently available to the public. b) The project will conform to the strict design guidelines of the City thereby eliminating any offensive site visible to the public. XIX. Recreation; a) Terra Vista currently has a park implementation plan with the City to ensure recreational amenity construction as development occurs within the planned community. b) No known religious or sacred uses are presently conducted on-site. XX. Cultural Resot, rceS: a) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. b) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. c) The project should not impact any unique ethnic cultural values. XXI. Mandatory_ Findings of Signi~cance: a) No known animal or wildlife species are expected to be substantially adversely impacted by the project. b) There are no known long-term environmental impacts that are expected to occur as a result of the project. c) The project is part of the larger Terra Vista Planned Community for which an Environmental Impact was prepared and certified. The application will contribute to the cumulative impacts within the Planned Community and the City. Therefore, the application will be required to comply with the mitigation measures outlined in the Terra Vista EIR. d) It is not anticipated that the project will have any adverse impacts on human beings. EARLIER ANALYSES The application is part of the Terra Vista Planned Community for which an EIR was prepared and certified by the City. This document is available at the Planning Division, City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive. EZ) ~,~ Initial Study Part 2 Response TT 14803 Page 5 The Master Environmental Assessment for the General Plan was also referenced in evaluating the potential impacts of the application. This document is available for review at the Planning Division, City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:40p.m. Scott Murphy January 16, 1996 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14803 - LEWIS HOMES - Review of the subdivision design, detailed site plan, and buiIding elevations for 44 single family homes on 7.23 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Plarmed C0rru'nunity, located on the north side of Elm Avenue, east ofSpmce Avenue-ApN: 1077-421- 26 and 27. Desio, n Parameters: The site is located on the noah side of Elm Avenue, west of West Greenway Park and Coyote Canyon Elementary School. The parcel south of the site was developed by the Central School District to supply additional parking and an off-street drop-offarea for the school. The parcel to the north is part of the Greenway trail connection between the noaheast comer of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and the northeast portion of the Terra Vista Planned Community. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Within the Low-Medium Residential standards of the Terra Vista Cornmunity Plan, there are two sets of development standards - those that apply to single family, detached, center plot homes and those that apply to "innovative" product types. Under the center plot requirements, the minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet, with an average lot size of 5,500 square feet. Under the innovative product type, the minimum lot size may be reduced to 3,500 square feet, with an average lot size of 4,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing a minimum lot size of 3,723 square feet and an average lot size of 4,371 square feet. The applicant is proposing to use the "Calais" product type originally approved for the project at the northwest comer of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive. The Calais product type ~vas originally deemed as innovative by the Planning Commission in approving that tract. In order for the applicant to proceed with the Calais product type for this project, the Planning Cornmission must reaffirm their determination that the Calais is an innovative product type. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Lots 24 through 27 should be reoriented to the east and west to provide a better relationship to the other units within the tract. Units will be oriented front yard to front yard rather than front yard to side yard. 2.... Single story units should be provided on all comer lots and within long rows of units to break the two-story massing along the streetscape. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee determine if the product type presented by the applicant constitutes an "innovative product type" consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan and forward that recommendation to the Planning Commission. Also, the appropriate conditions of approval should be artached to address any design considerations. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Larry MeNial, Larry Henderson , / Staff Planner: Scott Murphy DRC COMMENTS TT 14803 - LE\VIS HOMES January 16, 1996 Page 2 The Committee revie~ved the application and recommended approval subject to the realignment of Lots 8 through 12 to take access from Streets "A" and C." This realignment will require the loss of one lot as indicated on the revised plan provided by the applicant. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14803, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 43 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 7.23 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ELM AVENUE, EAST OF SPRUCE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-26 and 27. A. .Recitals. 1. Lewis Homes has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14803, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of February 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. Atl legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deten'nined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on February 28, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Elm Avenue, east of Spruce Avenue with a street frontage of 320 feet and lot depth of 410 feet and is presently vacant; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated for recreational uses and is developed with a pedestdan and bicycle trail. The properties to the south and west are designated for residential uses and are vacant. The property to the east is designated for and developed with an elementary school; and c. The development of 43 single family units on 7.23 acres is consistent with the Low- Medium standards of the Tetra Vista Planned Community; and d. The project, with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Terra Vista Planned Community and the Development Code; and e. The application is consistent with the Medium designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: '57 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14803 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 2 a. That the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, furlher, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Furlher, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fodh in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set fodh below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Enqineerinq Division 1) Driveways on corner Lots 1, 10, and 26 shall be located as far from the intersection BCR as the lot size will allow, to minimize conflicts between vehicles turning right and those backing out of driveways. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14803 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 3 2) Since drive approaches shall not exceed 40 percent of the lot frontage, the 16-foot approach width will only be allowed on lots with 40 feet or more of frontage. 3) Install a sidewalk connection from the West Greenway Corridor, through Lot A, to the corner of "A" Street and East Elm Avenue. Provide a variable slope between the north curb of Street "A" and the existing sidewalk within the West Greenway Corridor. 4) Install a sidewalk connection from "D" Street through Lot B and West Greenway Park to connect with the existing park sidewalk. 5) Street trees and parkway landscaping on the south side of "C" Street shall be installed by this developer to be maintained by the adjacent property owner, Central School District. 6) The south side of "C" Street ~hall be posted "No Stopping 6 AM to 4 PM except Saturdays, Sundays, and Holidays." 7) Replace the existing temporary inlet at the intersection of future Streets "C" and "D" with catch basins on both the north and south curbs. Revise and reference Drawing No. 1548-D. Process the necessary documentation to convert the existing storm drain from private to public maintenance concurrent with City acceptance of the public street. 8) This project is connected to or will disrupt an existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation area. Prior to new construction, a joint inspection and documentation of the existing area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing irrigation system shall be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of both areas is required prior to the City's acceptance of the new area. 9) Mitigation Measure: Because of traffic increases as a result of cumulative development within the Terra Vista Planned Community, the following traffic signals shall be designed and installed in a progressive manner, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway, Milliken Avenue at Church Street, Church Street at East Elm Avenue, and Church Street at Spruce Avenue. The developer shall submit a list of upcoming projects which may be eligible for Transportation Development Fee credits and a construction phasing plan for traffic signal installation, using a balance sheet format to keep track of costs and fee credits, for review by the City Engineer. Fee credits and construction status shall be updated as building permits are issued. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. - TT 14803 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretan/ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 281h day of February 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ran~,~1~'~%~nga · DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: ~/~ Those items chewed are Cond~ions of ~proval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits Completion Date )v/' 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission. if building permits are ----/ / not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to ! / . .._J / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of __/ / V/ 4. Thedevelopershallcommence,participatein, andconsummateorcausetobecommenced, ..__./ / parlicipated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districrs propedy upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes .__/ / first, the applicant shall consent to, or parlicipate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Furlher, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordalion of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC- 10/94 I Compledon Date: This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. V' 6. Prior to recordalien of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is .__J / involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prio r to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which .__/ / include site plans. architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and .Specific Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all ._J / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefacilityshallnotcommenceuntilsuchtimeasallUniformBuitdingCodeand __./ / State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ._.J / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits· v/' 5. Allsite. grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for --J / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. v/ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development .._.J / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances. and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and ! / Sheriff's Deparlment (989-6611 ) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location. height. and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. v/ 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units / / with all receptacles shielded from public view· 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, .-J / and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. V/ 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall ._J / be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or I,,~sc...~ing to the satisfaction of the City Ptanner. SC- 10/94 2 Com~ledon Date: 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with _._j / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner .__/ / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and / / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine .J / animals whe re zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the .__/ / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. Allparkways, openareas,andlandscapingshalt bepermanenfiymaintained bytheproperty _J / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or ._J / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system· The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and __/ / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exteriorof the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units .--J / and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and.efficienoy. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. V/ 2. All dwellings sha.~ have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural / / treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building~mj.~.,_,~ SC * ]0/94 3 Completion D~te: 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for ~ ___/ /___ City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of bu tiding permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or .J / projecllons, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall .__/ / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including coda). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be ----/ / provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles. .__/ / entrances. and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in .---/ / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles ---J / on this site unless they are the principal source of transporlation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner. City Engineer, and .--/ / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval priorto issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) v'/' 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ---/ / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitled for City Planner review and approval priorto the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier .J / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted o n the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be show n on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof__treespergrossacre,comprisedofthefollowingsizes, shallbeprovided .~/ / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and ~ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - __/ / 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three __/ / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC- 10/94 4 Completion Date: 6. Treesshallbeplantedinareasofpublicviewadiacenttoandaiongstructuresatarateofone tree per 30 linear leer ot building. ~ / 7. A~privatesiopebanks5~eet~r~essinverticaIheightand~t6:t~rgreatersiope.but~esst~an J / 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. Z 8. AllprivateslopesinexcessofSfeet.butlessthan8teet invertioalheightandof2:lorgreater ----/ / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- .--/ / ously maintained in a heal~hy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Priorto releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- --.-/ / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from lhe date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or J / · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. ' 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be .~/ / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- -J / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on _.._/ / the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. ,'/ 15. AII walls shall be providedwlthdecorativetreatment. lftocated in public maintenance areas, __/ / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division· 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and ...J / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. v/' 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of --J / Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC- 10/94 5 F, Signs Completion Date: 1. Thesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartofthisapproval. .-J /'- Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate apprication and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and ._.J / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes .J / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock __/ / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted / / Special Studies Zone forthe Red Hilt Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway __J / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the .__/ / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below45CNEL, the building matedals and construction techniques provided, and ff appropr ate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies 1. EmergencysecondaryaccessshallbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire -J / Protection District Standards. v/' 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimumof 26 feet wide ---/ / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be ._J / subr~itted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. // 4. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and U / location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written cedification of acceptability, including all ---/ / · supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of ; Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building peDls~,,)~2 SC- 10/94 6 P,o , t No.: Completion Date: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-1863,. FOIl 2E WiTH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: i. Site Development / 1. The applicant shall comp{y with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- ---/ / cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. v/ 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition J / to existing un it(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the establish ed rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or /___../ addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. v/ 4. Streetaddressessha~lbe~rovidedbytheBui~ding~~icia~~a~ertract/~arce~ma~rec~rdati~n ~ / and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances __/ / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for ---/ / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the J / Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. v// 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for .__J / building permit application. K. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City ~ / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ---J / pedorm such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance .--J / Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at ---/ / the time of application for grading plan check. V/ 5. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved priorto issuance of building permits. ---J / SC- 10/94 7 6. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site / /- drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto / / or over adjacent pamels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided / / propedies, are to be installed pdor to issuance of building permits for construction upon any pamel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each pamel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety ---J / Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses .J / or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon cornpier ion of grading or so me other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of The Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 I of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access v/' 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets. / / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets / / (measured from street centerline): total feet on total feet on total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made -..J / for all private streets or ridyes. 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: __/ /.__ 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs// or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or pdor to the issuance of building perre.s. whe.a no map is invo,ved. SC- 10/94 8 Completion Date: 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. J / 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-toot minimum building restriction area on the __J / neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: "l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohib/t the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. v/' 8. All existing easements lying w~thin future rights-of-way shall be qu itclaimed or delineated on _...J / the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way J / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum J / of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane. a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interestsJ / necessary to construct the required public improvements, and ff he/she should fail 1o do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required forthe improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site properly interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a podion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. M. Street Improvements v''/1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, _._J / landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to C~y Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter. AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be __/ / constructed for all haft-section streets. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: .j / STREET NAME CURB & A.C. SIDE- DRIVE S]~EET STREET CO~MM MEDIAN BIKE GUTYER pvivrr WALK APPR. LIGHTS TREES TRAiL IS~_AND TRAIL OTHER Corno]cdon Date: Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. V"' 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- --J / tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or pdvale street improve- ments, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pedormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a --J / construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit .__./ / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signalconduitwithpullboxesshallbeinstalledonanynewconstructionorreconstruction .-.J / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engin ee r. Notes: ---/ / (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. ._J / e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with --J / adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be __/ / installed 1o City Standards, except lor single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. ..--/ / i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. .__/ / 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for ---/ / review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Ds-Z sc - ~0/94 10 J ~.z 7. Infersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for contormance with Completion Dat~: adopied policy. ~ / a. On eoHector or larger streets, lines of sight shal~ be plotted for all proiect intersections, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by .__.J / moving the 2 +/- closest st feet trees on each side away from t he st re et and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: --J' / 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the ---/ / issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Areas v/ 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance D'strict: (- /' 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pdorto final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. I,/ 3. Allrequiredpubliclandscapingandirrigationsystems shaHbecontinuouslymaintainedbythe developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or podions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood J / protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibilily to have the current FIRM Zone ._J / designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologicJhydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA priorto final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOM R) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. ~ 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final __/ / map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. SC- 10/94 11 Comnle~on Da~e: 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. __/ / v/ 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. --/ / v/ 6. Public storm drain easements shaft be graded to convey oreallows in the event of a --/ / blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities v" 1. Provide separate utility services Io each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, / / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. v/' 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / Y" 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ----/ / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Depadment of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into "/ / one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or ---/ / issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: / 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan -----/ / Drainage Fees shall be paid prior I0 final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of*way: __J / 6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community __/ / Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be com- --.J / pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 987-6405, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. sc - ]0/94 12 V/2. Fire flow requirement shall be /2--5"~) gallons per minute. __/ / A. A previous fire flow, conducted revealed gpm available at 20 psi. B. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire depadment personnel prior to water plan approval. C. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. v'/ 3. Fire hydrants are required All requ red pub ic or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed----/ / and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building mate dais on sit e (i .e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be wifnessed by fire department personnel. v// 4.Existing~rehydrantl~cati~nssha~~bepr~videdpri~rt~waterp~anappr~va~.Requiredhydrants' J / if any, will be determined by this department. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be u pgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible conslruction,evidence shall be .__/ / submitted to the Fire Distdct t hat temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. v/' 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to -J / final inspection, 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: ---/ / Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Other Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plaslics manufacuring, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion ---/ / of sprinkler system. 9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: J / Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. California Code Regulations Title 24. NFPA 101. Other 10. Roadways wilhin project shall comply with the Fire Distdct's fire lane standards, as noted: ---/ / All roadways. Other SC- 10/94 13 11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. ---J' / 12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. ---/ / v/' 13. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide ---/ / at all times during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. 14. All trees planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of14'6" from ground up so __/ / as not to impede fire apparatus. 15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: ---/ / Lighted director within 20 feet of main entrance(s). Standard Directory in main lobby. Other 16. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall---/ / be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 17. Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the FireJ / Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 18. A tenant use letler shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. ---J / v/' 19. Plan check fees in the amount of $. have been paid. _._/ /.__ An additional $ ,/~. ' shall be paid: /Prior to water plan approval. Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submit'lal of plans. 20. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: / / A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. B. Storage of readily combustible material. C. Places of assembly (except churches, schools and other non-profit organizations) D. Bowling alley and pin refinishing. E. Cellulose Nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin). F. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet. G. Garages .,~ Motor vehicle repair (H-4) H. Lumber yards (over 100,000 board feet). SC- 10/94 14 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14803, THE CONSTRUCTION OF 43 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ELM AVENUE, EAST OF SPRUCE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-26 and 27. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Homes has filed an application for the Design Review of Tentative Tract No. 14803, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafier in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of February 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on February 28, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health. safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set fodh below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR TT 14803 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 2 1) Return fencing shall be provided between each unit. The fencing shall be decorative to match the building elevations. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 2) Comer side yard walls/fencing shall be provided. The walls shall be set back 5 feet from the back of the sidewalk. Landscaping shall be provided between the wall and the sidewalk and shall be maintained by the homeowner. The wall shall receive a decorative treatment. The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall cedify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller. Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 1996 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Rancho~Cucarnonga DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: ~/~ Those items chewed are Cond~ions of ~proval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits CornDiction D3Ic 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ---J / not issued or approved use has not co mmenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / U / 3. Approval ol Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of __J / Thedevelopershallcommence padicipatein andconsummateorcausetobecommenced, ._./___J 4. padic pated in, or consummateg, a Mello-Ro'os Community Facilities District (CFD) for the ~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to; all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districrs properly upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities Dislrict, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Furlher, if the affected school districl has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approvaLof the project and prior to the fecordalion of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. SC- ]0/94 1 Cc~rnpletion Date: This ~ndition shall be waived ff lhe City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school distri~s have entered into an agreement to privately accom~date any and all school impacts as a resuff of this project. 6. Prior to re~rdation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is / / involved, written codification from the affected water distri~ that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to seNe the proposed project shall be submi~ed to the Depa~ment of Commun~y Development. Such le~er must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of su~ivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development ~ 1. The s~e shall be developed and maintained in a~ordance with the approved plans which J / include site plans, archite~ural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained heroin, Development Code regulations, and .Specific Plan and ~ Y~f4 Planned Community. 2. Prior to any. U~e of the project s~e or business activily being .commenced thereon. all J / Cond~ions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the C~y Planner. 3. ~upancy of the facil~y shall not comme~e until such time as all Uniform Building Code and J / State Fire MarshaWs regulations have been ~mplied with. Pr~r to ~upancy, plans shall be submitted to the Ranc~ Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show ~mplian~. The building shall be inspected for ~mpliance prior to occupancy. ~ 4. Revised s~e plans and building elevations i~o~rating all Conditions of Approval shall be J / subm~ted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All s~e. grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shale be coordinated for J / consistency pdorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. ~ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive ~mplian~ with all sextons of the Development J / Code, all other applicable C~y Ordinances, a~ applicable Commun~y Plans or Specific Plans in effe~ at the time of Building Pe~ issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the C~y Planner and J / Sherffrs Department (989-6611) pdor to lhe issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height. and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent propedies. / 8. ff no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units J / w~h all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet C~y standards. The final design. locations, J / and the humor of trash receptacles shall be subje~ to City Planner review and approval prior ~o issuan~ of building perm~s. / 10. All ground-mounted utility appudenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall J / be Ionted out of public view and adequately scree~d through the use of a combination of concrete or ma~n~ walls, herruing, and/or land~aping to the salisfadion of the City SC- ~O/94 2 Comr~let~on Date: 11. Street names shall be submiRed for C~y Planner review and approval in accordance with ~ / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. / 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, J / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical ~nditions, fencing, and J / weed control, in accordance w~h City Master Trail drawings, shall be submi~ed for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordalton of the Final Tract Map and prio r to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restd~ions (CC&Rs} shall not prohibit the keeping of equine J / ant mals where zoning requ ire ments for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to ~ards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&RS. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and ARicles of In~r~ration of the J / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions an~ t~e C~y A~orney. They shall be re~rded ~n~rrently with lhe Final Map or prior to the issuance of building perm~s. whichever o~rs firS[. ~ recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. AIIpa~ays, openareas, andlands~pingshall bepermanenfiymaintained bythepropedy J / owner, homeowners' association, or other means a~eptable to the Cffy. Proof of this lands~pe maintenance shall be submi~ed for C~y Planner and C~y Engineer review and approval prior to issuan~ of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the pu~se of assuming that each lot or ~ / ~elling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a ~lar energy system. The easements may be ~ntained in a Declaration of Restri~ions for the su~ivision which shall be reardeal ~ncurrently with the re~rdation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetalion, structures, figures or any other object. excepl for utility wires and similar objeds. pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The proje~ ~ntains a designated Histor~al Landma~. The site shall be developed and J / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landma~ A~eration Permit No. . Any furlher ~dificat ons to the site including, but not limped to, extedor a~erations an~or interior alterations which afro d 1 he ex er or of the buildings or stmctures, re~val of landma~ trees. de~l~ion, relocation. reinstraction of buildings or stm~ures, or changes to the site, shall.require a modification to the Hisloric Landma~ Alteration Permit subject to Historic PreseNation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other a~ernative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacffy and efficiency. All swimming pols installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented w~h ~lar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be subm~ted for C~y Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building pe~its. 2. All ~ellings sh~ have the fr~, s~e and rear elevatbns'u~raded w~h architectural J / treatment. detailing and increased delineation of su~ace treatment subject to C~y Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits, SC- ~0/94 3 8.Standard patio ~ver plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submi1Ied lot C~y Planner and Buildin9 ~fiGial review and approval prior ~o issuance of buildin9 permits. 4. All roof appu~enanGes, includin9 air condifioners and other tool munled equipmen1 and/or proje~ions, shall bo shielded from view and the sound buffered from ad}aeenl prope~ies and streets as required by the Plannin9 Division. Such s~reenin9 shall be architecturally integrated with the buildin~ design and ~nstmcted to the satisla~fion o~ th~ City Planner. Details shall be included in buildin9 plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1.All pa~ing lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the pa~ing stall (including ~). 2. Tenured pedestrian pathways and tenured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to ~nnect dwelling~units/buildings with open spaces/ plazaSrecreational uses. 3.All pa~ing ~aces shall be double striped per C~y standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and ex~s shall be striped per C~y standards. 4.Allun~sshafl~e provided w~h garage do0r openers if ~dvewa~'are less than18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions a~ Restrictions shall restdct the storage of recreational vehicles on this s~e unless they are the principal sour~ of transpo~ation for the owner and prohib~ pa~ing on interbr circulation aisles other than in designated visitor pa~ing areas. 6. Plans for any secur~y gates shall ~ subm~ed for the C~y Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review a~ approval priorto issuance of building perm~s. E. Landscaping (for publicly malntaln~ lands~ areas, refer to Se~lon N.) 1. A detailed la~scape and irrigatbn plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ing in the case of residential development, shall ~ prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submi~ed for C~y Planner review and approval prior to the issuan~ of building perm~s or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot su~ivision. 2. Existingtreesrequiredtobeprese~edinplaceshallbeprotectedw~ha~nst~ctionbarrier in a~ rdance with the Mu nicipal Code Se~ion 19.08.110, and so noted o n t he grading plans. The location of those trees to be prese~ed in place and new locations for transpl ant ed tree s shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the ar~rist's recom~ndations regarding prese~ation, transplanting and trimming methods. 3. Aminimumof__treespergrossacre,~mprisedofthefollowingsizes, shall beprovided w~hin the project: % - ~- inch ~x or larger, % - 36- inch ~x or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch ~x or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for eve~ three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC - 10/94 4 DA 6. Trees shall be p~anted in areas of public view adjacent to and aiong stn~ctures at a rate ot one ComD]edon Dat~: tree per 80 ~inear feet of bt~Hding. ---J / ~/ 7. A~tprivatesiopebanks~teet~r~essinverticaIheig~tand~t~:1~rgreaters~pe.but~ess~han ___/ / 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy· 8. AIlprivateslopesinexcessofSfeet,butlessthan8 feet inverticalheightandof2:l orgreater ----/ / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy, v/' 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- --J' / ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied bythe buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be condu_cted by the Manning .Division to determine that ·they are in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- / / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or __/ / · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. V/ 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be J / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coo rdinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as moundtrig, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- ---/ /--- ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on __.J__.J the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. AII wallsshall be providedwithdecorativetreatment. lflocated in publicmaintenanceareas, __J / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and ._.J / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteda shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. ~ 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of / / Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. sc- lo/94 5 F. Signs 1. ThesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartofthisapprovaL ---J / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs· 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and .__J / approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes ..__/ / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental .1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock ._J / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted --J / Special Stud!e_s Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determi0ed by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway __./ / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to Ihe _J / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuationto below45CNEL, thebuilding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies v/' 1. EmergencysecondaryaccessshallbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire ---/ / Protection District Standards. 2. Emergency access shatl be provided, maintenance lree and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide --/ / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection : District requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of buitding permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be J / submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. v'/ 4. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and / / location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all / / · supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. sc- 1o/94 6 C0rnD]etion APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-'1863, FOP; 3E WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development v/' t. The applicant shall comply with irhe lairest adopted Uniform Building Code. Uniform Mechani- ----/ / cal Code. Uniform Plumbing Code, National Elecirric Code. and all oirher applicable codes. ordinances, and regulations in effect air irhe time ot issuance of relative permitts. Please contract irhe Building and Saireiry Division for copies ot irhe Code Adopirion Ordinance and applicable handouts. v'/ 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition --J / to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay deve Iopment fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or .__/ / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such tees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee. Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. / 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official~ after t~a~t/parcel map recordation /__J and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the propedy line clearances --J / considedng use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for ---J' / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed. filled and/or capped to comply with the / / Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code. v// 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for /.___/ building permit application. K. Grading t//' 1. Grading of the subject properly shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City J / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to J / pedorm such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control poundaries; a Soil Disturbance --J / Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardtrio County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. ~ 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted air ---/ / the time of application for grading plan check. V/ 5. Thefina~gradingpiansshal~bec~mp~etedandappr~vedpri~rt~issuance~fbuildingpermits. J / SC- 10/94 7 2/13/96 To whom it may concern, I am very much in favor of the proposed project to build 30 SF detached homes on Terra Vista Pkwy, west of Belpine. The our community stands a better chance of maintaining the good quality of our neighborhood with the addition of single-family homes vs. aparlment complexes. I feel that people who own their property have mere appreciation foi' their neighborhood since they have some stake in the future of their neighborhood when they decide to sell their home. That is not to say the rentere do not care about their community - that is not true.. Rentere can show the same appreciation and respect for their community. Another issue I would like to raise with the Planning Department is that of the intersection of Milliken and Terra Vista Parkway. Recently, I spoke to a gentleman in the Planning Department regarding the danger of crossing this intersection - and the desperate need for a traffic signal. I was told that a traffic signal was part of the "master plan' for Tetra Vista. Well, I have been a homeowner in Terra Vista for over four years and have yet to see the fulfillment of this aspect of our 'master plan". However, what I have seen i~ a number of traffic accidents at this specific location. I don't know if it will take one of our neighborhood children being hit while trying to cross (on foot), or a fatal traffic accident, but I think it would be in the city's best interest to install a traffic light at this intersection as soon as possible. In addition to it being almost impossible to cross Milliken at 5pro, the slope of Milliken m~kes it even mere difficult to detect northbound traffic. - My final concern for our 'master plan' iq Tetra Vista is "Central Park'. This sign ha~ also been posted for over four years. I have yet to see any type of development on this lot (on the north side of Baseline between - Milliken and Valencia. When does the city (or Lewis Homes) plan to develop this piece of property? I have also raised this issue with the Planning Department: but was referred to Lewis Homes. I did not receive a satisfactory answer from either the city or Lewis Homes. Thank you, in advance for attentio~ to these matters 'ncere , R E C E [ V E D .~- Calais Tract Joyce Medeiros Bowers 'FEB '1 1996 7577 Belpine Place Rancho Cucamenga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: February 28, 1996 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15725 - LEWIS HOMES ~ Review of the subdivision design, detailed site plan, and building elevations for 30 single family homes on 3.45 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, west of Belpine Place - APN: 1077-091-35. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 8.7 dwelling units per acre B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - Single family residential; Terra Vista Planned Community, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Single family residential; Terra Vista Planned Community, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East Single family residential; Terra Vista Planned Community, Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community, elementary school C. General Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Nodh Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West Low-Medium Residential (4°8 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site presently contains abandoned modular units that were used by the Central School District as temporary school facilities. The modulars are now abandoned and will be removed from the site. The property slopes 2 ¼ percent from north to south. ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ']'1' 15725 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. Backqround: In August of 1986, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 12671 and the related design review application, commonly referred to as the "Calais" project. The applicant constructed the majority of the development but left a remainder parcel at the northwest corner of the site. In working with the Central School District, the applicant set aside this parcel for use as a temporary school facility. Modular classrooms were brought to the site and utilized until roughly 1994/95. W~th the completion of Coyote Canyon Elementary and Ruth Musser Middle Schools, the modular classrooms were no longer needed by the School District. The applicant is pursuing relocation of the modulars. B. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 30 single family lots on the remaining parcel from the original "Calais" tract. The lots proposed range in size from 3,543 to 6,876 square feet with an average lot size of 4,163 square feet. The subdivision will complete the street system originally planned for the area. The unit mix consists of one single-story floor plan and three two-story floor plans. The single-story units are plotted on corner lots, where possible, and paired to provide variation in the streetscape. Under the Terra Vista Planned Community requirements, single family residential development shall maintain a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet with an average lot size of 5,500. If however, the applicant proposes an "innovative" product type, the minimum and average lot size requirements can be reduced to 3,500 and 4,000 square feet, respectively. The proposals by the applicant are consistent with the "Calais" project located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway. The "Calais" project was previously recognized by the City as an innovative product and was a Design Award winner in 1989. The units provide low walls at the front of the buildings to provide greater variation along the streetscape and create small courtyard areas within the front yard. The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission continue to consider the units as innovative. C. Desion Review Committee: On January 16, 1996, the Design Review Committee (Lumpp, McNiel, Henderson) reviewed the application. The Committee felt the architectural style maintained the innovative concept originally approved with the "Calais" project. The Committee also felt that the design of the project, as submitted, was acceptable and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. Minutes are attached (see Exhibit "H"). D. Technical Review Committee: Under the terms of the Tetra Vista Planned Community, residential projects are allowed to be developed within the next higher or lower density range without going through a formal Development District Amendment (zone change). Such a request, however, does require the City Council to approve the application. Because the application is proposed at 8.7 dwelling units per acre, the development falls into the Medium Residential category rather than the Low-Medium Residential category for which the property is zoned. Therefore, the Planning Commission's action will be a recommendation to the City Council. E. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed Part 2 of the Initial Study and determined that the application will not have a significant impact on the environment. Therefore, staff is recommending issuance of a Negative Declaration. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 15725 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Design Review for Tentative Tract 15725 and recommends that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration and approve Tentative Tract 15725 through adoption of the attached Resolutions. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:SM:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Utilization Exhibit "B" Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" Site Plan Exhibit "D" Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" Building Elevations Exhibit "G" Initial Study Exhibit "H" Design Review Committee Minutes of January 16, 1996 Resolution Recommending Approval of Tentative Tract 15725 Resolution Approving Design Review for Tentative Tract 15725  SITE UTILIZATION MAP ." TENTATIVE TRACT NO, :15725 / '--L__], i ii ~ I ~ I --I -t -q I I TENTATIVE TRACT MAP .... , TENT A T I VE ............................ TRACT NO. ]5725 ...!::::':' '.;,.:,J.:,'; 'i "~. ,~,~,~o " ' ~-.. ,~,o-,~ .[ ............... ......... V.', i::"'----: ._2J,' ".~ ...... ".': '; ...... '..':..":,': ; ......... >' ' :': ,. ®:':;', 'e: ~"e r'~;:.'b:F'9!e',i',.~:,.I' .:~:.,:7.'. lJ' r .... . ---:~ ~.: ...... :,..:.. .... .; ~ .,: ".'~" ~fL"iu"i..li",.,.7 ...... ,:'. :: ..,,.;7.": i ~,:~"' .,~,-9 ~ ...i i, ...... ""' ., ,,,i ,:, i:...!~_,E%::~:!.~t!-..-mz..Q.,':L,.'>" :'!!~V? ,.:,\~:::;; ,'i'~ ........ \, !~ ~..p.Li..,. ;?',L'~""~'~--~'::'''- i'::'''!'. ...... "' .... " .... . *!~,.:..-;::~:':I ~,,..-',a ,,...~:,i.,,,-,:'-':,' ..... ' ' j~""'x ": ~" :" ' ""': ....... '" "" 'f .2::!__..=2:)'~., I' i ' ,% ':...~... ~-~..I,, ....... , ......... ,'it", ....... ! i, i ......... 1.... -. ::::'. ;*-::: :::::~..~ I DETAILED SITE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 25725 IN THE CiIY OF RANCll0 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA ' ' ' :--j -:: t':! '. 2 L_,r '~_l, -., "' ~_ ]-~- .... : ' __J / k~ ..... ~--! -~--1_~-- Z_LJ__~ ..... ~// k 62," ' ~" - ' ~(~' :~ '''~' ' ~' " ' .. '~:'. 5' ,' ~ ~., ' · ~. ~-_ ..... //II ....... ~ ............ ~ ~ ......... ~ ~, ~ ........ FEATURE LEGEND CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN TERRA VISTA TENATIVE TRACT MAP #15725 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA J,~ ' ~,$: 3L PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN S,L-!:_,.~-_._. I TENTATIVE TRACT NO ~5725 ";:""' '-" 3.81 ACRES GROSS 30 LOTS I LOT'A' · .,.~_~ ;:.:~): i · :: _L!' _'."".j_, -.~ L ~2~';'~ / '- ~' *" ': ........ ";':;':~ ........ ~' .... Z~-'~Z'Z · ,,.:,?.. ..... jj J ..... . ........ ~~~ -.'-----;--~-;~-- ~ ~-_--~- ~/i!?I ~ ! ...... :-::_~.:::~..-,,, ..... , ....~:. ~,,,. ~ -, :::-'%. ::. . .:~::.....-'~,.?- )? ;,,,.,;:,~,~,- ~' / iI i\ --.'% ;:.1' ' i " I:-Hi~i!~ ' ' - - -- · . ,, i,; ~ , / ; -,..,,, ~ .... T.n ................. /,i .... i i i ......... ( 't~ .,.. t ......... I ; , ' " x G-1 ;. '-. ./ ,. - ....... . ....... . ....................................................... PI.AN 483 - ELEV. ---9 EXTERIOR__MATERIALS h'~ " ~j =;: e:.~ .~, EXTERIOR MATERIALS ENVIRONME, TAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I- Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Q~ality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full; INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information- GENERAL i~MFORMATION Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: Calais - Tract 15725 Name & Address of project owner(s): Lewis Homes of California 1156 N. Mountain Avenue~ P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 Name & Address of developer or project sponsor: Lewis Homes of California 1156 N. Mountain Avenue, P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 Centact Person & Address: Gary Luque, Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 N. Mountain Avenue, P.O. BoX 670, Upland, CA 91785-0670 Telephone N,,~her: (909~ 946-7529 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): N/A Telephone N-m~er: N/A C I T Y o f R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A PRDU'BCT INFORMATIUN & DESCRIPTION Information indicated by asterisk (~) is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 X 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s} which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points which serve the site; and ~representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): St. Trooez Drive and Marmand~ PIece 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 1077-091-35 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 3.81 acres *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications): 2.86 acres 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): None 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water, and the County Agricultural Commission for dust control. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainag~ courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures- Attach photogTaphs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of information (i-e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): Topography: 2 % - 3 % gentle slope, north to south Soils: Stable and well drained. Trees: None. Flora and fauna: No remarkable species per the Terra Vista Master EIR. Existing structures: None. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): There are no noteworthy features per the Terra Vista master EIR. 11) , Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: There is roadway noiset primarily from Terra Vista Parksray. Potential impacts will be addressed by an acoustical ~y. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use which will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: The single family detached project will comprise 30 units and complete the Calais project. The four house plans will be the same as the Seville homes in Tract 15526. The Calais houses will be sold from a model complex in Tract 15526t and the first phase of production is scheduled to start in April 1997. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-fam/ly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North: sinqle family detached residential East: sinqle family detached residential (Calais) South: single family detached residential (Calais) West: Future sinqle family 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No. The Droiect will ~mplPt~ fhp ~1~ ~l~halv~nn. 15) Indicate the type of short-term &nd long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses- What methods of sound proofing are proposed? Calais qenerated noise will be consistent with the noise. mainly traffic, that neiqhborinq residential comunities qenerate. No soundproofing is proposed. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or .replacements of mature or scenic trees: Not applicable. There are no trees. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: None. 18) , Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 18,000 Peak use (gal/day) 30,000 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) . Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal- Septic Tank X Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewag~ generation: (see Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 8,100 b. Industrial/commercial (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PRfkTECTS 20) Nun~ber of residential units: 30 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Maximum: 7,084 sG. ft. Averaqe: 4,164 $~- ft- Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ 140,000 to $ 173,000 Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Plan 483 1 story 3 bedroom~ Plan 485 2 stQ~/ 3 be~rnnm~ Plan 486 2 story_ 3/4 h~dr~m~ · Plan 484 ~ story_ ~/~ h~drnnm~ , · Plan offers a b~droom or d~n nphinn. 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: Plan Household Size 483 Z 485 3 486 3 484 4 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a- Elementary: 10 b- Junior High: c. Senior High: 6 ODMMERC~AL, 1%IDDb-rK~AL AND INST12Vi'I(~AL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of co~unercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: % 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) ' Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: ~31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): ~;J. P~OJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. All agencies are able and willinq to service the Droiect, 33) In the know~ history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not lim/ted to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuel, oils, solvents, and other flanunable liquids and gases. Also, note undergT_ound storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. NO 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. NO I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 11/10/95 Signature: ~ '.~//~///___- Title: Manager of Special Proiects ATTACN/~ENT A Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single F~m{ly 600 gal/day Apt/Condo 400 gal/day Co~zmrcial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial 3000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 1500 gal/day/ac Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/ac Peak Usage For all uses Average use X 2.0 Se~er FlO~B Residential Single F~m~ly 270 gal/day Apt/Condos 200 gal/day Cc~rcial/lndustrial General Commercial 2000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Com-~rcial 1000-1500 gal/day/ac General Industrial 2000 gal/day/ac Heavy Industrial 3000 gal/day/ac Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 9/86 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPI ~ENT OF WATER RESOURCES ~46 35' ~47 ~ r R 7 ',v (CUC,4MONGA PIL'AK) 449 R a W 32'30" : t ~ /~ ~ ~::~ ~'~, .~.,. .. :~. ; ~..~ ~ ~,,; ~1~ ,,: ~ -.,~.~l~ · .": ,,- '2]'E~::{ ~' ' ~. - =.~ [ - .::i' :7 'F:."~',i~::~: "~: ~ ' ""' ' ' I '~: ~_ _ ~. _~ _2 ~. _ _ _~ .,, ~ ., ~,, ~-.. , ...................... :.----~ ............: ........ ~ ....... ...~ ~ i ' ~:.:;~;~?~----~ ~ wen:i; '; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM IAL STUDY - PART II BACKGROUND 1) Project File #/Name: 2) Related FUe(s): 3) Applicant: Address: /c~p ~X' Telephone #: 4) Project Description: 5) Project Accepted as Complete (date): ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, explanation of the ~otential impacts identified as "Yes" or "Maybe" answers are required on attached sheets. An explanation shall also be provided in each instance where a potentially significant effect has been determined not to be significant and is marked "No." Yes Maybe No I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstableearthconditionsorinchangesinthegeologicstructure? Q C3 b) Disruptions, displacement, compaction or over covering of the soil? ~ Q Q c) Change in the topography or ground surface relief features? El/' Q E3 d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Q Q e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Q Q f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sand, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of ariverorstreamorthebedoftheoceanoranybay, inlet or lake? Q Q g) Exposure of 'people or property to geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Q Q [Z"' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Yes Maybe No II. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a) Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?Q Q b) The creation of objectionable odors? [] Q c) Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Q Q III. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changesincurrents,orthecourseofdirectionofwatermovements, in either marine or fresh waters? Q Q Et/' b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? Q [~ Q c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? Q Q d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any body? e) Discharge into surface waters-;-or in any alteration of surface water quality, including, but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? n n f) Alteration of the direction or rate of ground waters? Q n g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Q Q h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Q Q i) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal pools? [] [] IV. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?E3[] b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species of plants? [] [] c) Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Q [] d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Q Q V. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals (birds; land animals, including reptiles; fish and shellfish; benthic organisms or insects)? b) Reduction of the number of any unique, rare, or endangered species or animals? Q [] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Yes Maybe No c) Introduction of new species of animals into the area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? Q Q d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? El Q VI. NOISE. Wifl the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? Q b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Q Q VII. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal: a) Produce new light and glare? El El VIII. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in: a) Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Q Q IX. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Q El X. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a) A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limitedto: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? El El b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Q El XI. POPULATION. Wifi the proposal: a) Alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? Q Q XII. HOUSING. Will the proposal: a) A~ectexistinghousing,orcreateademandforadditionalhousing? XIII. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? El El [3/ b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?ElEl .c) Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? El El d) Alterations to the present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? El El e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? El El f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? ~' ~7 El Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Yes Maybe No XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? Q El b) Police protection? Q Q c) Schools? d) Parks and other recreational facilities? Q Q e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Q Q f) Other governmental services? XV. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of .fuel or energy? Q Q b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Q Q XVI. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? Q Q b) Communications systems? Q Q c) Water? d) Sewer or septic tanks? El Q e) Storm water drainage? El Q f) Solid waste disposal? XVII. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Q Q b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Q El XVIII. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in: a) The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public?Q Q b) Creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?El Q El'/ XIX. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in: a) Impact upon the quality of existing recreational opportunities?Q Q b) Restrict the religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? El Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Yes Maybe No. xX. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal: a) Result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? Q Q El/' b) Result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Q Q Et/' c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which wou Id affect unique ethnic cultural values? Q Q El//' XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal co'r~'munity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Q Q GEl,/ b) Short-term: Does the project have the potential to achieve shod- term, to the advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A shod-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definite period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) El El Et/' c) Cumulative:Doestheprojecthaveimpactswhichareindividually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect on the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) El El d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Q Q XXIL DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. (Attach additional sheets with narrative description of the environmental impacts.) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA XXIII. DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS, (An examination of whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, plans, and applicable land use controls.) XXIV. DETERMINATION. (To be completed by Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: a) I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment, and A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared .............................. b) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because mitigation m~sures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared .............................. Q c) I find the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required ......................... Q Signature l, / /J Print Name / For Date CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKlIST Initial Study - Part II Discussion of Environmental Evaluation Project Description: TT 15725 - Lewis Homes 30 single family residences on 3.45 acres Located on the S/S of Terra Vista Parkway. W/O Belpine I. Earth: a) The site is not within any known unstable earth condition area. b) The site was previously graded to accommodate the modular buildings used for the school. Additional grading will be required to provide the lots and streets for the proposed subdivision. The grading will be conducted under the supervision of a licensed surveyor or registered geologist. The impact is not significant. c) The topography of the site will be altered slightly to accommodate the building pads and streets. The grading will be supervised by a licensed soils engineer or registered geologist to ensure compliance with Building Code requirements. The impact is not significant. d) No known or unique geologic or physical features exist on this site. e) Upon completion, the site will be landscaped and/or paved to prevent soil erosion. f) The subdivision should not affect any oceans, bays, rivers, or lakes. g) The majority of Califomia is susceptible to earthquakes. The project is not within any known special study zone that will require additional studies or that poses a unique hazard. II. Air: a) The number of vehicles anticipated with this development is consistent with the information contained in the Terra Vista EIR. The resultant air emissions will not have a significant impact on air quality. b) The proposed residential subdivision will not create any objectionable odors. c) The proposed subdivision will not result in alteration to the climate or air movement. III. Water: a) The development of residential lots will not effect the currents or course of water movement. b) The absorption rate will be altered because of the paving and hardscape proposed. All waters will be conveyed to approved drainage facilities which have been designed to handle the flows. A Master Plan for drainage was considered as part of the Terra Vista EIR and the mitigation outlined in the Master Plan will be implemented with the development. The impact is not significant. c) The project will not alter the course or flow of flood waters. d) The development of single family lots will not affect the amount of surface water in body. Initial Study Part 2 Response TT 15725 Page 2 e) The project will not be discharging into any surface waters. f) No alteration of groundwater is expected to occur with this project. g) No direct additions or withdrawals of ground water are proposed. h) The project will be tying into existing facilities which have already been sized in anticipation of this development. The amount of water usage is not significant. i) The project is outside of the established flood plain. IV. Plant Life: a) All native vegetation was removed with the grading for the temporary school. Trees and shrubs were installed as part of the school construction. The applicant will remove existing vegetation and replace with comparable species. b) There are known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) Landscaping introduced to the site will be compatible with existing landscaping material. The plant palette will continue the pattem of existing development in the area. d) No agricultural crops exist on-site. V. Animal Life: a) There are no known animals that currently occupy the site on a regular basis. b) There are no known rare, unique, or endangered species on-site. c) No new species will be introduced as a result of the project. d) The project is located within the interior of the City, surrounded by development. In that no animals currently use the site on a regular basis, the development of homes will have no impact on fish or wildlife habitat. VI. Noise: a) The noise level will be less than the previous school use but greater than the existing unused site conditions. The level of noise is not significant. b) The noise levels will be no greater than the existing noise levels from adjacent development. VII. Light and Glare: a) New light and glare will be created because the property is not in use. The amount and type of lighting is residential in nature and illuminates the immediate area. Spillover is not expected. VIII. Land Use: a) No land use alteration is proposed with the application. The homes are permitted within this area and are consistent with the Terra Vista EIR. IX. Natural Resources: a) The number of homes proposed will not significantly increase the rate of natural resource consumption. Initial Study Part 2 Response TT 15725 Page 3 X. Risk of Upset: a) Single family residences do not typically contain materials of the type of quantities that could lead to an explosion or the release of hazardous materials. b) The homes will not interfere with emergency response. XI. Population: a) The project is consistent with the expected population distribution in the area and as anticipated in the Terra Vista EIR. XII. Housing: a) The project will not create the need for additional housing. XIIL Transportation: a) The project will generate new trips because of the new construction. The number of trips is consistent with the Terra Vista EIR and is accommodated by the existing infrastructure. The impact is insignificant. b) All required parking will be provided by garages. Visitor parking can be accommodated by the on-street parking. c) The proposal is consistent with the Terra Vista EIR and General Plan Master Environmental Assessment for which the street widths were evaluated at a build-out condition. d) The project will maintain the existing circulation patterns for the movement of goods. e) The project will not affect air, water or rail traffic. f) The application is expected to increase the risk of traffic hazards because of the new construction. Pedestrian amenities (sidewalks) will be installed as part of the project. The impact is not significant. XIV. Public Services: a) The Fire Department is currently serving the area. b) No substantial new services are expected with the project. c) The school districts having jurisdiction have notified the City of the current impaction problems. A letter is on file with the City indicating acceptance of the application because of a separate agreement between the applicant and the school district. d) The project will have no impact on existing park facilities or result in the need for additional facilities. e) The site will provide new roads as part of the development. The tract will be annexed into an assessment district and landscape and lighting district to cover the costs of maintenance. The impact is not significant. f) No other govemrnent services are expected to be affected by this proposal. XV. Energy a) The project is not expected to use substantial amounts of fuel or energy. Initial Study Part 2 Response TT 15725 Page 4 b) The development is not expected to result in substantial increase on the demand of existing energy sources or the need for new energy sources. XVI. Utilities and Service Systems: a) The facility will not result in the need for power or natural gas systems. b) The facility will not result in the need for new communication systems. c) The facility will use water readily available in the adjoining streets. d) The discharge from the site will be handled by the existing sewer facilities. e) All storm water drainage will be handled within the street right-of-way and conveyed to acceptable storm drain facilities. f) No significant solid waste disposal will be necessary to serve the site. XVII: Human Health: a.) The development is not expected to create any health hazard. b) No exposure of people to potential health hazards is expected. XVIII. Aesthetics: a) The project will not obstruct any view or vista currently available to the public. b) The project will conform to the strict design guidelines of the City thereby eliminating any offensive site visible to the public. XIX. Recreation.'. a) Tetra Vista currently has a park implementation plan with the City to ensure recreational amenity construction as development occurs within the planned community.. b) No known religious or sacred uses are presently conducted on-site. XX. Cultural Resources:, a) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. b) No known prehistoric or historic site exists within the project boundaries. c) The project should not impact any unique ethnic cultural values. XX/. Mandatory_ Findings of Significance: a) No known animal or wildlife species are expected to be substantially adversely impacted by the project. b) There are no known long-term environmental impacts that are expected to occur as a result of the project. c) The project is part of the larger Terra Vista Planned Community for which an Environmental Impact was prepared and certified. The application will contribute to the cumulative impacts within the Planned Community and the City. Therefore, the application will be required to comply with the mitigation measures outlined in the Terra Vista EIR. d) It is not anticipated that the project will have any adverse impacts on human beings. Initial Study Part 2 Response TT 15725 Page 5 EARLIER ANALYSES The application is part of the Terra Vista Planned Community for which an EIR was prepared and certified by the City. This document is available at the Planning Division, City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive. The Master Environmental Assessment for the General Plan was also referenced in evaluating the potential impacts of the application. This document is available for review at the Planning Division, City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 5:40 p.m. Scott Murphy January 16, 1996 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15725 - LEWIS HOMES - Revie`,v of the subdivision design, detailed site plan, and building elevations for 30 single family homes on 3.45 acres offand in the Low-Medium Residential designation (4-8 d`,velling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the south side of Tetra Vista Park`,vay, ,,vest of Belpine Place - APN: 1077-091-35. Design Parameters: The site is located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway on the previous site of the temporary Ruth Musser Middle School and Coyote Canyon Elementary School. On September 8, 1993, the original tract, Tract 12671 was approved by the Planning Commission. The tract was approved for 57 units but because of the needs of the School District for a temporary school site, the final 30 units were not constructed and the modular school buildings were installed. With the construction of permanent school facilities, the site is no longer needed as a school facility. As a result, the applicant is looking to complete the project with the same product type originally approved, the "Calais." Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Within the Low-Medium Residential standards of the Terra Vista Community Plan, there are two sets ofdeveIopment standards - those that apply to single famiIy, detached, center plot homes and those that apply to "innovative" product types. Under the center plot requirements, the minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet, with an average lot size of 5,500 square feet. Under the innovative product type, the minimum lot size may be reduced to 3,500 square feet, with an average lot size of 4,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing a minimum lot size of 3,543 square feet and an average lot size of 4,163 square feet. As previously mentioned, the original tract was approved with the Calais product type on lots of comparable size. The Calais product type was originally deemed as innovative by the Planning Commission in approving the original tract. Staff believes that the completion of the tract with comparable lot sizes and the same unit type is 'appropriate to maintain the continuity of the neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends that the product type be reaffirmed as "innovative" to allow completion of the tract consistent with the original approvals and the existing' neighborhood. SecondaN Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Corru'nittee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Lots 21 and 22 should be reoriented to take access from Marmande Place. This will eliminate the concem of vehicles backing out of the driveway on Lot 21 in close proximity to the street comer. 2. Single story units should be provided on all comer lots and within long rows of units to break the two-story massing along the streetscape. d,<>//&'f '2-/~' DRC CONIMENTS TT 15725 - LEWIS HOMES January 16, 1996 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee determine that the product type presented by the applicant constitutes an "innovative product type" consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan and forward that recommendation to the Planning Cornmission; Also, the appropriate conditions of approval should be attached to address any design considerations. Design Reviexv Committee Action: Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Larry McNiel, Larry Henderson Staff Planner: Scott Murphy The Committee reviewveal the application and recommended approval with the condition that Lots 21 and 22 should be oriented towards Marmande Place. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 15725, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 30 81NGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 3.45 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY , LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, WEST OF BELPINE PLACE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-091-35. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Homes has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 15725, as described in the title of this Resolution. Heroinafter in this Resolution. the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of February 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that nil of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on February 28, 1996, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to properly located on the south side of Tetra Vista Parkway, west of Belpine Place with a street frontage of 388 feet and lot depth of 434 feet and contains buildings previously used as a temporary school facility; and b. The properties to the nodh, south, and east of the subject site is designated for and developed with residential uses. The property west of the site is designated for park uses and is vacant; and c. The project, with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Terra Vista Planned Community and the Development Code; and d. The application is consistent with the Medium designation of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and ~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15725 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 2 b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The Tentative Tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large. now of record, for access through or use of the properly within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Furlher, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits. and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set fodh in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of the application subject to each and every condition set fodh below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Enqineerinq Division 1) Complete the street improvements on Terra Vista Parkway across the project frontage and join the existing improvements to the east and west, pursuant to current City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In addition, since the perimeter landscaping along the south side of Terra Vista Parkway will be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District (LMD), LMD plans shall be prepared and the landscaping constructed to current City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT15725-LEWIS HOMES February 28,1996 Page 3 2) The median opening on Terra Vista Parkway is to be closed and in-fill landscaping provided, along with revised landscaping for the existing median as determined during plan review, pursuant to City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3) Install full street improvements on Marmande Place and St. Tropez Drive to current City standards to match the existing improvements constructed per City improvement Drawing No. 1141 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Street trees or easements for same will not be required 4) Revise City improvement Drawing No. 1141, Calais Court, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, for the drive approaches associated with proposed Lots 27 through 30 of the Tentative Tract Map. In addition to the drive approaches other improvements may consist of curb, gutter and sidewalk. Street trees or easements for same will not be required. 5) Terra Vista Parkway frontage to be posted for "No Parking." 6) A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated cost of operating all street lights during the first six months of operation, prior to Final Map approval or issuance of Building permits, whichever occurs first. 7) The Tentative Tract has shown the development to be constructed in two phases, Phase I and II; however, all public improvements shall be completed with Phase I. All public improvements constructed with Phase I shall be completed prior to occupancy of the last lot within Phase I. 8) This project is connected to or will disrupt the existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation area within the Terra Vista Parkway median island because of the in-fill landscaping required. Prior to new construction, a joint inspection and documentation of the existing area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing irrigation system shall be retocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for the altered landscape area for a minimum of 90 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection of both areas is required prior to the City's acceptance of the new area. 9) A 5-foot public utility easement will be required and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 10) The driveway widths shall not exceed the City's requirement of 40 percent of the lot frontage, with the exception of Lots 27, 28, 29, and 30 located along the cul-de-sac of Calais Court and Lots 7, 8.9. and 10 located on the northerly side of the knuckle of St. Tropez Drive and Marmande Place, of the Tentative Tract Map, where the driveway widths shall be 12 feet, the City's minimum. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 15725 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the' City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: Z/.,~..IX//~,.~ '~4~3' Those items checked are Conditions 'of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, {909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits Comp~cdon D3l¢ v/' 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are -----/ / not issued or appmved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / , ._J / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of ._J / v/' 4. Thedevelopershallcommence,participatein,andconsummateorcausetobecommenced, --.J / participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordation of the finalmaportheissuanceofbuilding permits, whichever comes J / first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However. if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the fecordalion of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. sc- 1o/94 1 This condition shall be waived ff the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privalely accom~date any and all school impacts as a resu~ of this project. 6. Prior to re~rdation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written cedification from the affected water district thal adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to sere the proposed project shall be submitted to the Depadment of Community Development. Such le~er must have been issued by the water district wit hin 90 days prior to li nal map approval in the case of su~ ivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development 1. The s~e shall be developed and maintained in a~rdance with the approved plans which include site plans, archite~ural elevations, extedor materiais and colors, landscaping, sign program. and grading on file in the Planning Divisbn, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and Spec~ic Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prior to any use of the project s~e or busine~ activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. ~upancyofthefacil~yshallnotcomme~euntilsuchtimeasailUniformBui[dingCodeand State Fire Marshall's regulations have been ~mplied with. Prior to o~upancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show ~mplian~. The building shall be inspected for ~mpliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised s~e plans and building elevations i~o~rating all Conditions of Approval shall be subm~ted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / 5. All s~e, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement pians shall be coordinated for consistency pdor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case ol a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. ~6. Approval of this request shall not waive ~mplian~ with all se~ions of the Development Code, eli other applicable C~y Ordinances, a~ applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Pe~ issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the C~y Planner and She~f's Department (989-6611 ) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent propedies. ~ 8. if no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shaft be for individual units w~h all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet C~y standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subje~ to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. ~ 10. AH ground-mounted utility appudenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be Io~ted out of public view and adequately scree~d through the use of a combination of concrete or ma~n~ we[is, herruing, and/or land~aping to the satisfa~ion of the City ~- Z0/94 2 COmpledoQ D~te: 11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with ~ / the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, .__/ / including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and .J / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restdclions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine ._J / animalswhere zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual tot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenanls, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the ._J / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. 16. Allparkways, openareas, andlandscapingshall bepermanenfiymaintained bytheproperty .J / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to 1he City. Proof ol this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or .~/ / dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08,060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and .J / maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or interior alterationswhich affect the exteriorof the buildingsorstructures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units .J / and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. All dwellings shaft have the front, side and rear elevations 'Upgraded with architectural / / treatment, detailing and increased delineation of sudace treatment subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building pe~i~,,~. SC- 10/94 3 Com~ledon Date: 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for __/ / City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. All roof appurlenances, including air conditioners and other root mounted equipment and/or ._J / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent propedies and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of The City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (lndlcale details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _.._/ / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be J / providedthroughout the development Io connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, J / entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in ---.-/ / depth from back ot sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restdct the storage of recreational vehicles --.J / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitled for the City Planner, City Engineer, and .---/ / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- -.--/ / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape arohitect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier .J / in accordance with the Mu nicipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted tree s shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arbdrist"s recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming methods. 3. Aminimumof treespergrossacre,cemprisedofthefollowingsizes,shallbeprovided --.J / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon. 4, A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - J / 24-inch box or larger. 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three J / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. SC- 10/94 4 Completion Date: 6. Treesshallbeplantedinareasofpublicviewadjacenttoandalongstructuresatarateofone tree per 30 linear feet of building. J / v/ 7. All private slope banks 5 leer or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than.J / 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. AIIprivatestopesinexcessofSfeet, butlessthan8 feet invedicalheightandof2:l orgreater -J / slope shall be landscaped and irdgated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size lree per each 250 sq. It. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. v// 9. For single family residential development, all slope, planting and irrigation shall be continu- .--J / ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied bythe buyer. Priorto releasing occupancyforthose units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-lamily residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- .~/ / sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and fhriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, ferlilizing, mowing, and Irimming. Any damaged. dead, diseased. or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping Shall be required per the Development Code and/or ._..J / · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be ..__/ / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- J / ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on J / the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. v// 15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, .__./ / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and ..J / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteda shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. v///17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of --J / Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC- 10/94 5 Comple~on Dat~: F. Signs 1. Thesignsindicatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartofthisapproval. ~ / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the SignlOrdinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2, A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and .__/ / approval pdor to issuance of building permits. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apadment, condominium, or townhomes _...J / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock _..J / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted ---/ / Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway _J / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the .__J / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuationto below45CNEL, the building matedals and construction techniques provided, and it appropriate, verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies v'/ 1. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance wi~h Rancho Cucamonga Fire ---J / Protection District Standards. ¢/ 2. Emergencyaccessshallbeprovided, maintenancefreeandclear, a minimumof26feetwide ---/ / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. v/' 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be ._J / submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. 4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and ._J / location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all ----/ / supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Depadment of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. SC- 10/94 6 Completion Date: APP/ICANTS SHALk CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-'1863, FOil 3OM PLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: te Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- J / cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes. ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. v"/ 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition ----/ / to existing u nit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fee s may include. but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee. Permit and Plan Checking Fees. and School Fees. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or J / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. v/ 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation _._/ / and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shaft be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for / / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal lacilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the / / Uniform Plumbing Code and Unitotto Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for / / building permit application. K. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City J / Grading Standards, and accepted grading pramices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. v/ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to J / pedorm such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance .~J / Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Deparlment of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. ~ 4. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at ~ / the time of application for grading plan check. ""5. T~efinaigradingp~anss~al~becomp~etedandappr~vedpri~rt~issuance~fbui~dingpermits. J / SC- 10/94 7 ComDledoO Date: 6. As a custom-lot sulxfivision, the lollowing requirements shall be met: a. Surety sha. be posted and an agree meat executed Suaranteeing completion ot all on-site ---/ drainage taci.ties necessary tot dewatedng all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto fina~ map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for sate disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto .--J / or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided -J / propedies, are to be installed pdor to issuance of building permits for construction upon any pamel that may be subject Io drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety ---.J / Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses .J / o r planted wit h ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 I of the Development Code. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access v// 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, /.--/ community trails. public paseos, public landscape areas. street trees. and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage. local teeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets --/ / (measured from street centerline): · total feet on total feet on total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made ---/ / for all private streets or drives. v""' 4. Non-vehicular access shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: / 5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs ~ / or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently wilh the map or pdor to the issuance of building permits, where no map is involved. ~:r~ 9 SC- 10/94 8 Completion Date: 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. J / ~ 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-toot minimum building restriction area on the .__/ / neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: "l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building restriction areas." A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. v/ 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shah be quitclaimed or delineated on -J / the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way .J / shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street righbof-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum .J / of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane. a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. · 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests .__./ / necessary to construct the required public improvements, and ff he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required torthe improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests requ fred in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. Street ImproVements V/ 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, J / landscaped areas, etc.) shown on lhe plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Slandards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street frees. 2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be .__/ / constructed for all haft-section streets. v/ 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: .__/ / STREET NAME CURB & A.C, SeE- DRIVE STREET STREET C(::)~4M ~EDIAN BIKE GUTFER pVMT WALK APPR. LIGHTS TREES TRAIL SLANO TRAIL OTHER sc-~o/e4 9 ComPletion Date: Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided forthis item. ~",) Z--4'zO Z4/,/&~dA?/:.'.t'~ ~ ~ M~,/.zJx/ I/"' 4. Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- ---/ / tered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteetrig completion of the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public dght.-of-way, fees shall be paid and a .--J / construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any olher permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit __/ / shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineen d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruction .__J / of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of lhe street at 3 feet outside of BC R, EC R or any other locations approved by t he City Engineer. Notes: ___/ (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all tour corners of intersections per City / / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / / adequate detours during construction. A streef closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as specified by the City Engineer. i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner priorto submittal for first plan check. /___/ 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for .--/ / review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in ._J / accordance with the City's street tree program. SC- 10/94 10 j V'/ 7. InterseCtion line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer tot conformafire with Comoledo. Date: adopted policy. ~ / a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be pinfled for all project intersections, ---/ / including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shah be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by ._J / moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. · 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: / / 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the ---/ / issuance of building permits: N. Public Maintenance Areas v/ 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval pdor to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: '~ cS~,'Z'At~:,,e/,),//~/~'/4/,4y . 2. A signed consent and waiver fo~ to join an~or form the appropriate Lands~pe and Lighting Distri~s shall be filed with the C~y Engineer pdorto final ~p approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be ~rne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be ~ntinuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 3~ ~/ff~~e~ ~ / 4. Pa~way landscaping on the following street(s) shall ~nform to the resu~s of the respe~ive Beautffication Master Plan: O, Drainage and Flood ~ntrol 1. The proje~ (or ~dions thereof) is Ionted w~hin a Flood Haard Zone; therefore, flood prote~ion measures shall be provided as ce~ffied by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer· 2. It shall be the developer's res~nsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation re,veal from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessa~ repels, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter o~ Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building perm~s, whichever o~urs first. A Le~er of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to o~upancy or improve~nt acceptance, whichever o~urs first. __ 3. A final drainage study shall be submi~ed to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final . map approval or the issuance of building permitS, whichever o~urs first. All drainage ~ ~acilities shall be installed as required by the C~y Engineer. SC - ] 0/94 11 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. __/ / 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. __J / 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey ovedlows in the event of a ---J / blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities I,/ 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water. / / gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. v'/ 2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary / / / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1, The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into '--J / one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or ---/ / issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first, for: ._.J / 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created pamels. 4. EtiwandaJSan Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan .---/ / Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: .__/ / 6.A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community ~ / Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be corn- --J / pieled beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 987-6405, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Mello Roos Oommunity Facilities Dis,rict require%n, ,l app,y to ,his proiect. sc- lo/94 12 :~/5'7Z-,.5" v/2. Fire flow requirement shall be /~-~ gallons per minute. __/ / A. A previous fire flow, conducted revealed gpm available at 20 psi. v/B. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. /'C. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. v'z 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed---/ / and operable priorto delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel Y'/ 4. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided priorto water plan approval. Required hydrants, .__J / if any, will be determined by this department. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upcjraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. v/" 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction,evidence shall be .--J / submitted to the Fire Distdct that temporary water supply for fi re protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. v//' 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to ---/ / final inspection. 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: ---/ / Per Rancho Cucamanga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Other Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacu ring. spray painting. flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 8. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion ---J / of sprinkler system. 9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: ---/ / Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. California Code Regulations Title 24. NFPA 101. Other V/ 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Distdct's fire lane standards, as noted: .---J / ~"//AII madways. SC -10/94 13 V/ 11. Fire depadment access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. J / 12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. ---/--- -- 13. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance tree and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide / / at all times during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. .14. All trees planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so / / as not to impede fire apparatus. 15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: --/ / Lighted director within 20 feet of main entrance(s). Standard Directory in main lobby. Other 16. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall----/ / be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 17~Gated/restrictedentry(s)requireinsta~~ation~faKn~xrapidentrykeysystem`C~ntacttheFire J / Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 18. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. ----/ / 19, Plan check fees in the amount of $ have been paid. .__/ / An additional $. /~P. ""' shall be paid: Prior to water plan approval. ¢/Prior to final plan approval. Note Separate plan check lees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews wit[ be assessed upon submittal of plans. 20. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: ~ / A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgement of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. B. Storage of readily combustible material. C. Places of assembly (except churches, schools and other non-profit organizations) D. Bowling alley and pin refinishing. E. Cellulose Nitrate pJastic (Pyroxylin). F. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 1 O0 cubic feet. G. Garages Motor vehicle repair (H-4) H. Lumber yards (over 100,000 board feet). :):~ E~;'''''~ SC- 10/94 14 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15725, THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE 8OUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, WEST OF BELPINE PLACE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-091-35. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Homes has ~led an application for the Design Review of Tentative Tract No. 15725, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution. the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of February 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh in the Recitals, Pad A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on February 28, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimenlal Io the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division '; 1) Approval of this resolution shall be contingent upon approval of Tentative Tract 15725 by the City Council. E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR FOR 55 15725 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 2 2) Return fencing shall be provided between each unit. The fencing shall be decorative to match the building elevations. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 3) Corner side yard walls/fencing shall be provided. The walls shall be set back 5 feet from the back of the sidewalk. Landscaping shall be provided between the wall and the sidewalk and shall be maintained by the homeowner. The wall shall receive a decorative treatment. The final design shall be reviewed and appreved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 4) A decorative perimeter wall shall be constructed along the north and west site boundaries to match surrounding walls. The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 4, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed. and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 1996 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15725, THE CONSTRUCTION OF 30 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, WEST OF BELPINE PLACE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-091-35. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Homes has filed an application for the Design Review of Tentative Tract No. 15725, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of February 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE. it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pad A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on February 28, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) Return fencing shall be provided between each unit. The fencing shall be decorative to match the building elevations. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. ~ ~-,~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ~ DR FOR TT 15725 - LEWIS HOMES February 28, 1996 Page 2 2) Return fencing shall be provided between each unit. The fencing shall be decorative to match the buiiding elevations. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 3) Corner side yard walls/fencing shall be provided. The walls shall be set back 5 feet from the back of the sidewalk. Landscaping shall be provided between the wall and the sidewalk and shall be maintained by the homeowner. The wall shall receive a decorative treatment, The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 4) A decorative perimeter wall shall be constructed along the north and west site boundaries to match surrounding walls. The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO GUGAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 1996 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ,,, ......%,,, ,, ,,,, ,, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a a DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items chewed are Cond~ions of ~proval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time LImits Complcdon D31~ V//' 1. ApprovalShallexpire, unlessexlendedbythe Planning Commission, if building perrnils are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granled subjecl to lhe approval of 4. The developer shall commence, padicipale in, and consummate or cause Io be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance ol a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be Iocaled, designed, and built to all specificalions of fhe Rancho Cucamonga Fire Prolection District, and shall become lhe District's propedy upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordalton ol the final map occurs. 5. Prior I0 recordalton of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes __J / first, the applicant shall consent to, or padicipate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District lot the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously eslablished such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the allernative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordafion of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Fur[her, il the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordalton of the final map or issuance · ~; of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. sc- ]0/94 1 Como|etlon This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 6. Prior to mcordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is _J / involved, written cedification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such leffer must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to fi hal map approval in t he case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which __J / include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein Development Code regulations. and Specific Plan and ~,~,g-'~' Y/,~7:~ Planned Community. 2. Prior to.~ny, p_se of the project site .or business activ(ty beihg .commenced thereon, all .__/ / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. OccupancyofthefacilityshallnotcommenceunfilsuchtimeasallUniformBuildingCodeand .__/ / State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _._/ / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for J / consistency pdorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building ,etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development __/ / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on~site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and / /__-- Sheriff's Depadment (989-6611) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. / 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units __/ / with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, andthe number of trash receptacles shallbe subjectto City Planner review and approval prior 1o issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. sc- lo/94 2 Completion D3t~: 11. Street names shall be submiXed for City Planner review and approval in eccordance with _j / the adopled Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final mep. Z 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner. __/ / including proper illumination. 13. A de~ailed plan indiesling Jrail widths, maximum slopes, physical ~ndifions, fendrig. and J / weed eomrol, in accordance w~h Oily ~asler Trail drawings, shall be submi~ed for Planner review and approval prior Io approval and reeord~fion of lhe Final Tr~e~ ~p and prior Jo approval o1 s~reel improvemenl and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and 811 ~rails. including fenring and drainage devices, in ~njun~fion wilh slreel improvemenls. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restd~ions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine J / animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to ~ards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Reslri~ions (CC&Rs) and Adicles of In~r~ralion of the J / Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the C~y A~orney. They shall be re~ed ~n~rrently.with lhe Final Map or prior to t~e i~SGance of building perm~s, ~hichever o~rs firS[.' ~ recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. .16. All pa~ays, open areas, and lands~ping shall ~ permanently maintained bythe properly J / owner, homeowners' association, or other means a~eptable to the City. Proof of this lands~pe maintenance shall be submi~ed for C~y PlanneE and C~y Eng neer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. .17. Solar access easements sha I ~ dedicated for ~he ~se of assuming that each lot or ~ / ~el[ing unil shall have the right Io receive sunlight across adjacent lots or un~s for use of a ~lar energy system. The easements may be ~n~ained in a Declaration of Res~ridions for the su~ivision which shall be re~rded ~ncurrenfiy with the rearclarion of the final map or issuance of perm~s, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except ~or utility wires and similar objeds, pursuant to Development Code Sedbn 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The proje~ ~ntains a designated Histor~al Landma~. The sile shall be developed and J / maintained in ac~rdance with the Historic Landma~ A~eration Permit No. . Any furlher ~dffications to the s~e including, but not limped to, e~edor alterations anWor interior alte rations which a~e~ the exterior of the buildings or structures, re~val of la ndma~ trees, de ~l~ion, relocation, reinstraction of buildings or stmdures, or changes to the site, shall.require a modification to the Hisloric Land~ Alteration Permit subject to Historic Prese~ation Commission review aRd approval. C. Building Design 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide ~mestic hot water for all dwelling units J / and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other a~ernative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capac~y and efficie~y. All swimming ~ols installed at the time of initial development shall be supplemented w~h ~lar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be subm~ted for C~y Planner review and approval prior to ~he issuance of building pe~s. 2. All ~ellings sh~ have the fr~, sMe and rea'r elevatbns "u~raded w~h architeclural ~ / . treatment, detailing and increased delineation of su~ace treatment subje~ to C~y Planner review and approval pdor to issuance of building permits. ~- ]o/9~ 3 8. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitled for .__/.__ __ City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. V/ ,1. All roof appurlenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipmenl and/or __j / projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. D, Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall __/ / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including ~rb). 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and te;dured pavement across circulation aisles shall be ---J / provided throughout the deve Iopment to connect dwe llings/unitsfouildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, /___/ entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. All units'~hail'l~e provided wi~h garage dc~or openers if &:ivew~'are less ihan 18 feet in --J / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Condilions and Restrictions shall restdct the storage of recreational vehicles -~/ / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitled for 1he City Planner, City Engineer, and J / Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distriot review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.) J 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including s!obe planting and model home landscap- .--J / ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing lrees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier ._.J / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted o n t he grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arberisrs recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming methods. 3. Aminimumof__treespergrossacre,comprisedofihefollowingsizes,shallbeprovided / / within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and % - 5 gallon. 4. A minimum of % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - .~/ / 24-inch box or larger. .5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three J / parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50°/o.ot !he par~ing are~m' so!or noon on August 21. SC - 10/94 4 Proi~ct 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one Completion Daft; tree per 30 linear feet of building. J / ,/ 7. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greaterslope, but less than J / 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. / .8. AIIPrivateslopesinexcessof5feet,butlessthanSfeet inverticalheightandof2:lorgreater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gaiton or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover· In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane· Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- J / .ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit ~s cold and occupied by the buyer. Priorto releasing occupancy forthose units. an inspection shall be. con_du_cted by the Planning.Division to deterEqine that·they are .in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-ramify residential and non-residential development, property owners are respon- __J /.___ sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way· All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead. diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or / / · This requirement shall be in addfilch to lhe required street trees and slope planting. 12. The final design of lhe perimeter parkways, wails. landscaping, and sidewalks shall be J /.~ included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 13..Special landscape features such as moundtrig, alluvial rock, specimen size trees. meander- :L__/ / ~ng sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on .J /,___ the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer, 15. AII walls shallbe providedwithdecorativetreatment. lflocated inpublicmaintenance areas, _J / the design shall be coordinated with lhe Engineering Division, 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and .J / approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of fhe selected tree species. 1/ 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of J / · ..:,% Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SC- 10/94 5 F. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. --J Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and ._~ / approval pdor to issuance of building permifs. 3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apadment, condominium, or townhomes __J / prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division pdor to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foudh Street Rock .._J / Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted ---J / Special~tud!e_sZonefortheRedHillFault inastandar~forma. t~sdetermi0edbytheCity Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway ._J / project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the .__/ / issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuationto below45CNEL, the building matedals and constructiontechniquesprovided, and ff appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. O~her Agencies '/' 1. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire ~ / Protection District Standards. v//" 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide ~ / at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. v//3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be _.J / submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required tire protection system. V// 4. The applicant shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and _J / location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written cerlitication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of ' ~' Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. SC- 10/94 6 Proleer No.:,~/5 Completion Date: APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Site Development v/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Un form Building Code. Uniform Mechani- ~ / cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies ol the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. v'/' 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition ----/ / to existing u nit(s), the applicant shall pay deve Iopment fees at the established rate. Such fee s may include, but are not limitedto: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. . 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or __/ / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such lees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Developmenl Fee. Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. / 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Officiai: after tract/parcel n~ap recordation __/ / and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the properly line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resisfiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for --.J / the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the .._J / Uniform Plumbing Code and Unitorm Building Code. / 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitled for ~ / building permit application. K. Grading '// 1. Grading of the subject propedy shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City '~ / Grading Standards. and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. v/ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ~ / pedorm such work. 3. The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Disturbance / / Permit is required. Please contact San Bernardino County Deparlment of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of rough grading permit. 4. A geological repod shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at ---/ / the time of application for grading plan check. v/ 5. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved priorto issuance of building permits. __/ / SC- 10/94 7