No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 28.2004 HPC Agenda . . . . . .. .. ... . . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . 1 .;.:.;®�,,. N,CO .. 41:�1-11YlOUL-9 H1ST"®R1C P'R�SIEF�VATi�N' CCiUII�SIN AGENDA Arrxo u. .. . . JANU�IRY 28, 2004 7.'00 P Cucamonga County 1Wter;District Board Room 10440 Ashford Street . Rancho Cucamonga, California L CALL'I'O ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Rol! Call Chairman Macias_ Vice Chairman McNiel -.._ Com........ Fletcher: Com........ McPhail Com. Stewart II. ANN®�JNCEMENTS III. PUBLIC I�EARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion 'of the related,project. Please waif to be recognized:by the;Chairman and. address the Commission by staling your name and address. All`such opinlans shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project; Please sign in after speaking. A: ENVIRONMENTAL 'ASSESSMENT AND HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2003-01048 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' A request'to designate the Pioneer Winery, located at 8812 Hagen Avenue; as an Historic Point of 'Interest in order to allow demolition of all buildings and;structures 'on the property APN: 0209-131-02. I'V. PUBLIC COMMENTS �. This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. lterris to be discussed here,,are those that do not already appear on;this agenda. HISTORIC ® p C C 3 /IS i ORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA 2 R"N°HQ CucnMONcn JANUARY 28, 2004 V. COMMISSION BUSiN7ESS VI. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Division Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 22, 2004, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga and at 10440Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga. L- r If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. t �c� n � y .� �stor�c Preseruat�on Corn� �s � _s ors _ :. pan �a : 2s zoo4 : , SPHERi:E OF'. 1NFCUEN:GE s � Qi � � _ W 'W HILLSlD � ' �1 4 � x . W y v V - �, "..' o 19TH _'; 'BASE L1NE q z'' FOOTHILL Qo �, ARRO W w�; Q a � z� �' .._.. t� z � w� _ '� � w 4TH Meeting Location Cucamonga County Water i]istrict Offices. . .:: 10440Ashford .Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730' Cit yHal 'N City of Rancho Cucamonga.: 4 �3: T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAM ONGA Staff Report DATE: January 28, 2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lori Shriver, Planning Aide SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIGNATION DRC2003-01048 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to designate the Pioneer Winery, located at 8812 Haven Avenue as an Historic Point of Interest in order to allow demolition of all buildings and structures on property - APN: 0209-131-02. BACKGROUND: A. Historical Significance: The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery began as the California Wine Association (CWA) Winery in 1905. The CWA administered wineries across the state, and the Cucamonga winery was used for the processing of grapes from local growers in 1905. In 1916, the CWA sold the winery to Garrett and Company, who later owned the Mission Winery. Garrett and Company used the Pioneer Winery for storage of their concentrates and tonics made at the Virginia Dare Winery. In 1934, several prominent families in the Cucamonga region formed the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association, including the Hofers, Thomases, DeBerards, Millikens, and Belchers. The association purchased the CWA winery from Garrett and Company and became the first co-operative in Cucamonga to own and operate its own winery. The association began to decline in sales by the late 1950's, and began to sell its wine through the Brookside Winery. In 1960, the association leased the winery to Brookside Winery, because of the death of Cucamonga Winery's winemaker. By 1972, the cooperative dissolved, and Brookside ceased leasing the winery in 1975. B. Site Characteristics: The winery building sits on a 9.65 acre parcel, containing seven contributing buildings: a scale house, boiler building, distillery, fermentation building, storage, cellar building, and crusher. The site also includes several outbuildings that do not contribute to the Historic Point of Interest. The land use designation of the site is Industrial Park and Low Residential. ITEM A HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01048- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The CWA built the first structures on the property, including the scale house, distillery, fermentation building, and a storage building, all of wood frame construction. A railroad spur of the Atkinson, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad was also constructed by the CWA. Exhibit "C" contains the Primary Records for these contributing buildings on the property. The remaining buildings were built after the mid 1930's, when the cooperative took over the winery. B. Point of Interest Designation: The subject site and structure do not qualify for landmark designation based upon the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance. The buildings have become too deteriorated to retain their historical integrity without substantial reconstruction. However, the site does qualify for Historic Point of Interest Designation due to the significance of the winery during the time it was owned by the cooperative. C. Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study was prepared for the project. Mitigation is included in the attached Resolution to address the historical nature of the winery site. FACTS FOR FINDING: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. Facts: The winery represents the agricultural period of the Cucamonga region, and relates to the livelihood of many residents. Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Facts: The winery was owned at one time by Garrett and Company, one of Cucamonga's prominent wineries. The cooperative involved several significant families within the Cucamonga region, including the Thomases, DeBerards, Belchers, Millikens, and Hofers. Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use, which was once common but is now rare. Facts: Wineries were once common within the Cucamonga area, but were not necessary, as demand for sweet wines declined and the region began to be subdivided by developers. Facts: The cooperative was the first in Cucamonga that independently owned its own winery, and was well known in the region for this accomplishment. HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT DRC2003-01048- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Point of Interest designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval of Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01048, subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution, to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:LSIma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Photographs of Winery Buildings Exhibit "C" - Primary Record for Winery District Exhibit "D" - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01048 =SITE LOCATION MAP a m z C C JERSEY AV LL 25TH ST -TT HUMBOLT AM m C E Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District Buildings Railroad Line Historic Point of interest Designation DRC2003-01048 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division December 2003 G- ...�..�Y.'•. r s .Y� - 4.'�f.�','CF4ln9eraah��_,_,,k;r5... -'� .t'�',+'r.�'`. .> i �. s , •�Y -_YAM.' `1t�'r�' y,-r �1 � J�f r :. �` ..7_' f < `xis� - s�,e +�C—^'. _ F Y e'.. � �,` "'sty. ", _ � t ._y§.�, ry.a „a � � - 'F � � ii � �7 � - i �,�`" � "gyp _' `°'�'^'N�.3^ _ day _ .�� r6'. t 4..'-..t F'kr '�G,.. j t i �� � � �; F� ...p:�, .r e •� •,'i�c >� y'. r ..rt by -..F .� y,, - }11 �! ass 'fl � 1,d; �It ,��. 3� i r s .., I!i +� , �� ;s. .•i �� i � e_. - -uru:;c � r' _{ � �'` Sy � '� -...G..�.ttt �,�..� ..:raj' !y�r� y �T _3�4S+5tk '�`v.1 -T ghiM'F }9- _ ' W� - ��j� v,F f _ -� -1 # 1 _ j r� ?:�13 w � t .. � � 7� q.K� �i .. ' � �"'"� a �` �^ :_1. III � , ,,�.�y,� fir. F p{ i � :1• S 1 � ., F � t e r.,,y. i� � _ �� �� � ,1 r . trP s € + �¢,t t 'a s."?°� `•�•"m°5 ' r � ,�. tg a y hp .,.��`5- �*- � '••yM`"s�`-'� ,'��=c'�" '�s� tii ,1, ���,,,,t�`��:.' r„�v �r..,•>�n��' .,�:A'� y!�; S r „� �1 ,� r t� sir { ;r r ^w, ..: d g!$P:'. ST�° ,{' " : ,L:,l if='•"rye`" a : `Ta" `. t '' ,€ r; �tr,",�.a: �; :a �.� ,r ,,,h; 9Y 3' `� a•zq-t�'�ia:y+�. F gl^ N tia_•�7rbaF Y 1 .�tl� fLB��y4�9y� *ls��d����Z�P,n4 F� tp�,�r�3�3.�Z l�. - q. P� 4. i`? yF '= }fi^ �w«-,+'P � 5 i a'b' ;`♦ 1F � s 3� Efw 3t,e '.4`�s'"y�}vf�_ `�5'7 '�bs sc'z •7n�= St i J. ' sC^4pt Yi 'NdI #- .j3. L SY �bF1% i.1P 3rF E i �C -ark�'° F. f� r ' •- x, if°'•�, � � �}�rr"Art'.. rv��,�€ir�.', 3� r ` a xatiy wd,..aY r3`h4�¢i"Y;�T V:.r r `�r s°" 4g f y,t y.C•a.' ��Mtc'�r�::etik >J }s ,er k.,,: ? �+ Fs`J;' ik w 3 Fr;' i; A€ Wq-11qk-Z -- ' r` i �! ti„ � r In,} �- 5,�.�{3 i� .;r>K`�°34�„ »� 6- - a x}r•✓' se.'n "�`:- �j.� -. �"h. �CF�:!ds l..} F �° i`L s �.^v�r v '� ��,G vv}y�i� 7 �j��,+� ,�t.�r�,t F�st`�' n � s r_ � # - ^�•-,. c sl .,,,1•€f $� � �"� $${{ �a 4� Ye'�i`r, ttr+�.+§�`•''`. a �i`�.E.r z�.�� �,,: 'dS r �•„, y r K � k _ i -w '.E�'C"`'k 't C. Y �taY ��._Cii�•A a�Ap��,m} �I '��� skw-.xs 3 a'�•K .,,�i RS���A 'h�,�_ .t�`ri`_ 4� �..� fi p. ��'��°4:z'1`$��?'',f� 7'2.>,4::Y{?�''RR'�rfy��iq✓'j.'!°l'.-: •i �If , i �a:.��t`a,;i:;,Lt• %>�w,aW r.tS `�i j '1 � ,.; s '• . 1 0.1 Pe 61, - �31 � , �� � �-«�..-.••'"�Y_srd �y� '1• � � Fib �A+�:->,�4{9•IP�(p!�`K i i ... �� f ��^ r,,,,,.�„-,..... <✓t.^ffi' N� _i: 1:��.,.:rarY�r L5 ��.�ir�"_ `5��y k�i� y`•, ��F�� ".Jn �.$ tea*• � .p -.r— yg�}�. '4 �s&v a �l• 9 b at I r n �����`� yd'� t� tcL�b*���i•� 11 r��Jr tv" � t � � "✓ �' '� JX ,i��'W�'g� ' a,'t'-`•�5�� cif r`' } � ,,-,� rs f�? �#fir.. t.'Et� � � .s ° , r # •� r 1�1 - w� F e' i S ililt1Y tr C e r S sick r, -�..� :�s€ 9r. �Syr ��,� ,�� � , •'�€ , t � r '{�ir i �-: P.7 a - i ti i r f Y - �r t� � a�.c r 1t}r �' i �, • ''•a rf �L..�r7, y t xrN •G +�� k�� t� x L,, ttf1Y� �- 1 �{1 E � s� • `� �•" "�' a � Yi � '� {a .+ {i t �� S{ 1i �T•;,jr.�.� r �� i �r��AaaEttsr IV der 9 ft-T•f / 'i� • y a� Y }4—Y�Fff A�7� 'i fit; J �2i� .:�R.. �• � �`•� r i r f is P ' _ Won sT r 5 9 g - �1A€ 4 £3 N - P'f¢k- t�- • b R � Of Kin # 0` . E 6 1 f + ON / y G 3 33 `' i L 7}F 4 .b pill � s•' t i b I WES ek s `2 E6i p AY p '. E d IN r }.� 1 r a :1' l?4 s" a s,oil I' t =NOR r f �.ii r s re° dJ1 .° x�r >t�� *"Vow � I i - i s< �s�i4 -��_.; 'ls"f7e � Y •yam" T� 1" i _ rw p t�' s'��R rn�''k.. `� s• � Sri YfS�y R. sryFp�{ -.R �i It •i I• :d�e4J.,L A" ���. - er'� •spy. i -Wax.. V I II II� - sl S .. xF { via ��`s Yam,'^d�usFt •r ss x -. t. =R:f"S�'+. - �4.Y�i5•.3n „'YdA�'l:L.� M1. 9�>.,1i S �y, - d lt..Y i :4 ] k .y .3 i .d �.'Jr.• .:Yts J •ta •Y r l .i 2. '•4 a -t ttP Cy t. b-, p•.r .F1-a,J t � t ;,,� "Z!� __ � �. �•,l VV C }ai ns < < S „Lt r i•c""' a -. .i.k 'r e n�!t,;jK(.-,S� . Y 'i.• i t ..F. f }s1 z it •q:J 1 -`e t' me r1�e r : cis- S► d. �L S'u y� yr,0 State,�nfCaiifomtaThe;ResotrcesAgen PrimaryIsm 3EM-01 11ENiTgOF=PARKS AfVD i CI EATIDN t31 ,ems. ..�n.,� - R1l1�ARY�RERD T�tnom arw R P`S3aius`Code .. . � ...- Review Page 1 ofy 34 *Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) 1 P1. Other ldentifrer: Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District - P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino and(P2c,P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966(1981) T 1S; R 7W; SE y of SE Y4 of Sec 11 ; 1206 S.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) zone 11 mEl mN *e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 0209-131-02 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and boundaries) The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District is located on a parcel measuring approximately 700- by 6004eet on the northwest comer of Haven Avenue and Humboldt Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. The surrounding area consists of a residential neighborhood to the west, Haven Avenue and an agricultural field to the east, light industrial properties to the north, and Humboldt Avenue and the Metrolink/Southem California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) (formerly Atchinson,Topeka and Santa Fe[AT&SF]) railroad tracks to the south. The district includes both archaeological and historic architectural resources. There are nine main architectural components within the district, seven of which are contributing elements to the historic district. There are also several outbuildings and ancillary structures on the property. The buildings and structures are concentrated in the north half of the parcel, a majority of which are located in the northeast comer.The landscape of the winery parcel consists mostly of graded dirt, although a portion of the yard has been paved with asphalt. Four historic artifact scatters and two isolated artifacts were documented within the District. The artifact scatters have not been formally evaluated for significance, but Loci 1,2,and 4 should be considered potentially contributing elements of the District. See continuation sheet. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (HP8) Industrial Building, (HP Ancillary_building,L H4) Privies/clumps/trash scatters AH16 Other 4. *P4. Resources Present: M Building 0 Structure Object Site 0 District 17T Element of District 0 Other P5b. Description of Photo: P5a. Photo or Drawing (View,date,accession#) Not applicable/see sketch map *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: X Historic ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Circa 1905, 1936, and 1950 (Hofer 1983: Sanborn maps 1913 and 1929)--_- - -_ SEE SKETCH MAP *P7. Owner and Address: Paul Hofer 11274 S.Turner Ontario, California 91761 *P8. Recorded by: (Name, aft€€ation,and address) Kirsten Erickson, Christine Hacking&Alex Wesson URS Corporation 2020 East First Street, Ste,400 Santa Ana CA 92705 *P9. Date Recorded: 21 April 2003 *P10.Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive survev P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter`none) Wesson,Alex, Christine Hacking, and Kirsten Erickson, 2003 Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Study Appendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical Report. URS Corporation, Santa Ana. *Attachments: ❑ NONE [K Location Map El Sketch Map .nX Continuation Sheet ❑ Building,Structure and Object Record IK Archaeological Record El District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑ Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record El Nine Primary Record Forms for District Architectural Components DPR 523J(1/95) Pioneer_winery.doc *Required Information ' XaMMMM g'. V. Isons F�Stat�of Califomie z 7he�Resources Agency ¢ �rePrlma(}I�t.R _ 3 OEPARTN1EiVT�F�PARKSAND�,AECREATION ' 'rFiRUTlfI]023i1a1 �i,CQ 9 NT�INU�ITIONfSHEET , Page 2 of 34 "Resource Identifier: 1 Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson,Christine Hacking,Alex Wesson 'Date 21 April 2003_ X Continuation ❑ Update Description(continued). The buildings and structures on the winery parcel are associated with grape processing and wine making. Five of the contributing elements are buildings associated with wine making.The scale house is located near the main gate to the winery and a scale located to the south of the scale house weighed truck loads of grapes as the growers brought them to the winery. The scale house likely served as an administrative area, as well as the place were truck weights were recorded. Three of the buildings were used to process the grapes—the Boiler Building, the Distillery, and the Fermentation Building. The last contributing building is the Storage/Cellar Building.Two of the contributing elements are structures—the grape crusher and the railroad spur. Mon-contributing elements include a poured concrete water tank and a residential building, which likely was.built in the 1940s or 1950s and does not possess sufficient significance or integrity.There are other ancillary buildings on the property, including concrete sheds, a concrete tank, concrete structures that may have housed pumps or other machinery, three cooling towers, and a redwood shed. Archaeological Loci 1,2,and 4 These three archaeological components to the District have not been evaluated at the time of publication for this form, but should be considered potentially contributing elements to the District. Locus 1:This historic artifact scatter is located on the north side of a concrete tank at the northern periphery of the winery parcel. Artifacts within the scatter consisted of white decorated earthenware fragments, as well as fragments of brown, green, olive, and clear container glass. Other artifacts included unidentifiable metal objects,nails,bottle tops,staples,bolts,screws,and pull-tops from beer cans. l Locus 2: This historic artifact scatter is located around a circular concrete water tank in the northwest comer of the r winery parcel. Artifacts within the scatter consisted of white decorated earthenware fragments, as well as "' fragments of cobalt, brown, green, olive, pink, clear, and "milk" within the scatter glass. Other artifact;;, included brick fragments, unidentifiable metal fragments, coils, barbed wire, modem beer bottles, bottle'' ' caps, roof sheeting,an old five-rung ladder,and pull-tops from beer cans. Locus 4:This historic artifact scatter that extends along the entire western perimeter of the winery parcel. The scatter also extends along the western half of the southern perimeter of the parcel. Artifacts within this scatter are similar to those found in Loci 1 and 2, however amethyst glass was noted in the artifact deposits along the boundaries of the property line. Most of the artifacts were observed between the perimeter fence and the paved surface of Marine Avenue and Humbolt Avenue. These artifacts may be associated with the Boarding House (no longer extant) shown on the 1913 Sanborn Fire insurance Company map in the west central portion of the winery parcel (Figure 5). Archaeological Locus 3 and,Isolate A and B These three archaeological components to the District do not appear eligible individually or as contributors to the District. Locus 3:This sparse historic artifact scatter is located in the southeastern quadrant of the winery parcel, in a plowed field south of the boiler building. Artifacts within the scatter consisted mainly of brick fragments and a few 1 unidentifiable metal fragments. Isolate A consists of a fragment of amethyst container glass. Isolate B consists of a ceramic sailor doll's head. DPR 523J(1195) Pioneer_wlnery.doc 'Required Inform®tion State of:t�lifotni rc k"ou ` Primary! DEPA I ME TOP.I-ARKS AND RECRE MOM HRT/' h n ti <C tl's 4� 4'vpgy .•.®C+141 !®N MAP Page 3 of 34 *Resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District *Map Name: Guasti *Scale: 1:24,000 _ *Date of map: 1966(19B1) Pet 57 JwIiL — ,�� .� C"°` ' Cucamonga Pioneer _ =L Winery District i«-- -JR :.� �M•n::. iT.y • Rturvpi Lx +�_ : - •w.� ; x - - —�:. We" —Well i 2000 0 2000 Feet RIM O 609.6 0 609.6 Meters . 123 7 1- A13 DPR 523J(1195) *Required information • F'`- r f 1 � A Y 770 ti to LY K � -. ►► ,� ;'" � ' 7 �* 3erseyAve • v - " 1j,p•+ ,ray ay,d! `, -!t "tilo •o' I -.t..',� ♦ s'r�}� °; .,yz. -Mere� !;n � -p:1 •r,�,7 , _ -P`� y p�.s .:�n�+ t -•i Y r p,� •r/ Y ! °1- tEa + 97-33n ' w Y % / 'i`•� '. -a i, «.Yip-,4'�"T^ / Pioneer y r. y District • 4 <: .isi __C' � r' S.'R°, 1' Sri,5, � •�fJla , s' ". L e y, >{'•7b,r. �''rj�'k j. �.., n g � : •„ k,�f r � " ' '���7YT '�'�z /�y,�, {f ef ow NM .10 Op tL !r err; +, ���� ,�•�:`� � � i I � ' �� ,� .• 'ty, ` r eA. ~S`v+K.t R'-,; ,y' f" .�V �+ ���� �� s� s$:4.C'.;I'.• r r C.,. 4' .Ir' A Scale House B. Boiler Building C. DistiU=y /r.'��`�'�' � '°rr• � Y '.si-�' ',{w. • ��aS R �'F'� :R�«�['{�h�y`��J T I ," wWwsw•�• M/r..W yY- .w[.m•-W+,+�R+ryr.. 2.3t:7Yatks- -� A tation E. Storage/Cellar Building xi.t ?t*F. '4Lq-I Crusher Q ✓h 4G. Water Tank y .:..-. Ouse 1. Santa Fe Railroad Spur fil r _ t. ,., "r ,�,c c.- ray '4'4g- rk �w++azsr .. egm U Stale of�Galifornia �The Resources Agencywr Primary rI DEPAR7MI=NT OF,PARKS AND=RECRE:: 14Tif ;� r HRIITrinornial DIsTRIcTRECo�D Page 5 of 34 *NRHP Status Code 3S *resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder): 1 D1. Historic Name: Cucamonga Pioneer Winery _ D2. Common Name: same *D3. Detailed Description (Discuss overall coherence of the district,its setting,visual characteristics,and minor features. List all elements of district.) (See description on the Primary Record form for more information) The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District is a suite of archaeological and historic architectural resources associated with a local winery organized by local grape growers in 1934.The buildings are located in the north half of the parcel,with a majority of the built environment located in the northeast comer.Although the parcel is surrounded by residential and light industrial development, it maintains the feeling of a rural winery. See continuation sheet. *D4. Boundary Description(Describe limits of district and attach map showing boundary and district elements.) The district boundary was defined as the boundaries of the San Bernardino County Assessor's parcel upon which the Winery is located (APN 0209-131-02).The parcel is approximately 700-by 600-feet and bounded by the property line to the north, Humboldt Avenue to the south, Haven Avenue to the east, and Marine Avenue to.the west (see sketch map). *135. Boundary Justification The boundaries were determined by utilizing the existing winery property lines. All of the District's significant elements are located within this boundary and the setting of the parcel retains integrity due to the relationship of the extant buildings and the agricultural feeling of the parcel. The winery has been located on this parcel since approximately 1.905. *D6. Significance: Theme Wineries and cooperative wineries: 1900-1950 Area Rancho Cucamonga and southern California Period of Significance 1935-1950 Applicable Criteria A B. &C (Discuss district's importance in terms of its historical context as defined by theme,period of significance,and geographic scope. Also address the integrity of the district as a whole.) r Note: Three of the historic artifact scatters within the District(Loci 1,2,and 4)should be considered potentially contributing elements to the District. They have not been formally evaluated for CRHR eligibility,but they may contain intact primary archaeological deposits from the period of significance,which would make them contributing elements to the District, and would make the District eligible under Criterion D. Historic Context The historic period of settlement in southern California began with Spanish exploration in the late eighteenth century. The Spanish government subsequently established missions and military outposts to facilitate colonization of the area. After Mexico won independence from Spain in 1821, colonization efforts in Alta California decreased. The Spanish mission system was largely abandoned and the Mexican government bestowed land grants or ranchos to those loyal to the Mexican government and to some Angio settlers. The region that would eventually become Rancho Cucamonga was part of a 13,000-acre land grant received by Tuberclo Tapia in 1839. Tapia, a soldier, smuggler, and politician, established a ranch and winery on his property(City of Rancho Cucamonga 2003). After Tapia's death,the property was passed to his daughter Maria, who married Leon Victor Prudhomme in 1847.The winery continued to operate under the direction of Jose Maria Valdez, Tapia's foreman and caretaker until 1858. At that time,John Rains purchased the Cucamonga rancho. Rains,a former Texas Ranger, had ambitions to own land and join the upper classes of California society. In 1856, he married into a prominent and wealthy family through his marriage to Maria Merced Williams. In response to the increased demand for wine and grapes, Rains expanded the winery. Due to its location along the highway between San Bemardino and Los Angeles, the ranch became a popular stop, and the area began to be known as a prime location for grape and wine production. See continuation sheet *D7. References City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga: A Tradition of Vision, (City of Rancho Cucamonga, 2002); City of Rancho Cucamonga, The History of Rancho Cucamonga, (hftp:fAvww.ci.rancho-cuoamonga.ca.us/planning/hertage.htm, 2003); City of Rancho Cucamonga, Designated and Potential Historical Site list,(City of Rancho Cucamonga, Revised April 1994);Clucas, Don L., Light Over the Mountain:A History of the Cucamonga Area, (Kengraphics Printing and Lithography Co.,Ontario, 1974); Daily Report, 'Pioneer Winery Grows Steadily, ° (Daily Re rt,on file at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, Pioneer Winery file, 1941);Hofer,James D.,A History of the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association, (Masters Thesis,Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, California, 1983); Winter, Kirsten, DPR 523 Fomr:2101 N. Glenoaks Boulevard, Burbank, California, (URS Corporation, Phoenix,2002). *D8. Evaluator: Kirsten Erickson Affiliation and Address: URS Co oration 7720 N. 16 Street Ste 100 Phoenix AZ 85020 Date of Evaluation: 4 June 2003 DPR 523J(1/95) Ploneer_wineryAoc *Required Information State of California--The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRIITrinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Page B of 34 *Resource Identifier: 1 Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson, Christine Hacking,and Alex Wesson *Date 21 April 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Detailed Description (continued) There are nine major architectural elements of the district, seven of which are contributing properties and two of which are non-contributors. In addition to the nine major elements, there are also several non-contributing outbuildings and ancillary structures within the district. Primary record forms for each of the nine major architectural elements were completed and are attached to this form. In addition to the architectural components of the district, there are six archaeological elements within the District. Three are considered potentially contributing properties, while the other three are clearly non-contributors. Primary records have not been prepared for each of the archaeological elements. Rather, these are described on a single archaeological site record form. Contributing Properties: Potentially Contributing Properties: A. Scale House Locus 1 B. Boller Building Locus 2 C. Distillery Locus 4 D. Fermentation Building E. Storage/Cellar Building F. Crusher I. Santa Fe Railroad Spur Non-Contribution Properties: G. Water Tank H. House Locus 3 Isolates A and B Outbuildings and AncillaEy Structures There are several outbuildings and ancillary structures located on the winery parcel. There are five, small concrete block sheds spread out across the parcel. The sheds are square or rectangular in shape with wood frame, hipped roofs clad with composition material with exposed rafter ends. Some of the sheds have wood doors with metal hinges, but some of the doors have been removed. At least two of the sheds contain electrical switches, which may have controlled pumps or other equipment. 17, Concrete Block Shed Located in the Southeast Quadrant of the Parcel(view east) DPR 523J(1195) Pioneer_winery.doc *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary t# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI/Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Page 7 of 34 'Resource Identifier: 1 Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson *Date 21 April 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Detailed Description (continued) There is also a square, concrete tank and two concrete boxes located near the northwest corner of the Fermentation Building. The tank is constructed of poured concrete and contains to storage reservoirs. There are pipes that extend to/from the Fermentation Building. pr f� � r �..,�.� "'T;r,., a •s 7 Concrete Tank Located Near the Northwest Comer of the Fermentation Building (view northwest) There are three cooling towers located on the parcel---one is located to the west of the house and is constructed of metal, suggesting that it is newer. The other two cooling towers are located to the west of the Fermentation Building and near the southwest comer of the distillery. The cooling towers are wood frame structures with concrete bases. The towers consist of stacked wood or metal trays. i :<w Wood Frame Cooling Tray Near the Southwest Corner of the Distillery(view north) 9 1r-;,- DPR 523J(1195) Pioneer_winery.doc "Required Information State of Califomia—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI/Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Page 8 of 34 'Resource identifier: 1 Recorded by; Kirsten Erickson *Date 21 April 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Detailed Description (continued) There is a wood framed shed located west of the house. It has no foundation and is currently mounted on horizontal logs. The exterior wall surface is board and batten redwood siding and it has a shed roof. There are two entries on the front of the shed—one entry has a wood door with metal hinges and the other door has been removed. Based upon its construction materials,this shed may be have been constructed about the same time as the Fermentation Building and the Distillery. Jill Wood Framed Shed(view south) None of the outbuildings appear to contribute to the significance of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District and are not major elements of the district. g DPR 523J(1195) Pioneer winery.doc `Required Information �5t to of.Caiifarnia � The'�i3esource_ � ,.,.,-, - nEPFARTMI�,NT oFP.ARKs, a�tL1 R1=CFiEA7fo` I l Vr.inom`ia1 aONTINUATI�N�SHE�-T ' Page 9 of 34 *Resource Identifier: 1 Recorded by. Kirsten Erickson *Date 21 Agril 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Historic Context(continued) In 1662, Rains was murdered on his way to Los Angeles, and as he had heavily mortgaged Cucamonga to finance other land purchases, his widow was forced to sell Cucamonga in 1870 to Isaias Hellman. Hellman subdivided the property, which was purchased by new settlers and land developers. Hellman sold the winery property, but later purchased it back in 1895, and formed the Cucamonga Vineyard Company(City of Rancho Cucamonga 2003; Hofer 1983). A short-lived land speculation boom occurred in southern California in the 1880s, which mainly was a result of railroad construction.After being connected by rail to the rest of the country, immigration to southern California became easier and rate wars between Southern Pacific Railroad and Santa Fe Railroad resulted in low fares. Immigrants to southern California were attracted by the favorable climate and agricultural potential.The Santa Fe Railroad track from Los Angeles to San Bernardino was completed in 1887,which promoted settlement and land purchases in Cucamonga. Hellman created the Cucamonga Fruit Lands Company and the area quickly became settled in the 1890s.A tunnel dug into the Cucamonga Canyon provided water to the settlers. Available irrigation water, along with the favorable soil and climate, allowed the settlers to grow citrus fruits, olives, figs, nuts, and grapes. The Cucamonga area was already known for its wine, and new immigrants to the area planted new vineyards and helped define Cucamonga as an important wine making region (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2003; Clucas 1974; Clucas 1974; Hofer 1983;Winter2002). Cucamonga, along with its neighboring communities,Alta Loma and Etiwanda, progressed during the first half of the twentieth century,but largely remained agricultural communities. Churches,schools, businesses, and infrastructure were built in the first part of the century and access to Los Angeles was provided via the Pacific Electric Railway from Alta Loma in 1913 (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2003). The wine industry experienced set backs during World War I and the 1920s and early 1930s. The Lever Food and Fuel Act prohibited the use of food for the making of liquor during the war, and the Volstead Act or Prohibition,which was in effect from . 1919 to 1933, had an adverse effect upon the wine and grape industry. Several of the large Cucamonga wineries closed or were sold during Prohibition, while others produced grape products such as concentrates and tonics. Many grape growers shipped their grapes and grape products to eastern cities. After the repeal of Prohibition, the demand for Cucamonga sweet wines increased as wine consumption increased(Hofer 1983). Wine sales continued to be good during World War 11 and wine inventories increased. However, after the war, wine supply dramatically surpassed demand due to lower agricultural prices and the post-war economy. After 1950, industrial and urban development increased, and more and more vineyard properties began to be sold. As agricultural property was transformed into industrial property and the Ontario airport expanded, wine making and agricultural enterprises in the Cucamonga area decreased. In the 1970s, the Cucamonga area experienced extreme growth as people working in Los Angeles and Orange Counties sought more affordable housing in suburban areas. In 1975, the communities of Cucamonga, Etiwanda, and Alta Loma were incorporated as the City of Rancho Cucamonga and became the third largest city in San Bernardino County(City of Rancho Cucamonga 2002). Wineries in Cucamonga The winery at the Cucamonga rancho had proved Cucamonga to be a superior environment for growing grapes and had established Cucamonga's reputation as an important wine making region. Soon after Hellman began to subdivide the rancho property, new wineries were established in Cucamonga. In 1866, George Haven and Daniel Milliken founded the Haven Vineyard Company, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Highway and 0' Street, directly across the street from the land that would become the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery. Haven and Milliken's efforts were important, as they were the first in the area to implement dry farming for grape growing, which would prove to produce sweeter wines, for which the Cucamonga area became known (City of Rancho Cucamonga 2003; Hofer 1983). Secondo Guasti established the Italian Vineyard Company in 1900. The more than 5,000-acre vineyard and winery were located south of Cucamonga. Guasti was successful in marketing his grapes and wine commercially, encouraging other grape growers and wine producers to do the same. The Mission Winery was founded in 1910 by Post and Klausman near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, and in 1911, the Cucamonga Vintage Company was established. The Cucamonga Vintage Company was the first cooperative association of grape growers in Cucamonga, but they did not own their own winery, but rather leased property near 8th Street and"Turner Street, in the vicinity of the Santa Fe Railroad tracks (Hofer 1983). DPR 523J(1195) Pioneer wlnery.doc *Required information State of.Calr ornia 7he"Resources=Agency Prima ARTMf~fVT OF�PAAKS;bNN�Df ECR6. EATO R�1'fr nonfifai Rage 10 of g4 'Resource Identifier: 1 Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson *Date 29 April 2005 X Continuation ❑ Update Wineries In Cucamonga(continued) The winemaking industry thrived in Cucamonga during the early years of the twentieth century. World War 1, followed by Prohibition and the Depression, caused the wine industry in Cucamonga to falter. The only large Cucamonga winery that was not closed or sold during this era was the Italian Vineyard Company, which survived by developing new grape products. Hellman leased the Cucamonga Vineyard Company to the California Wine Association (CWA) in 1910, and later sold it to the Cucamonga Investment Company in 1917. Garrett and Company of New York purchased the Mission Winery in 1918, which became the Virginia Dare Winery. Garrett and Company produced grape concentrate and wine tonics during the war and Prohibition. By 1928, the Cucamonga Vintage Company cooperative association folded and the winery was taken over by Western Grape Products(Hofer 1983). Despite the war and Prohibition, Cucamonga grape growers and wineries continued to operate, shipping their products to eastern cities.Alternate grape products included raisins, tonics, vinegar, and jams. Grapes were also shipped east to be used for homemade wine making, and wine with the legal alcohol content could also be produced.The demand for the Cucamonga sweet wines actually increased during the first half of the 1920s, causing the grape growers to plant more. However, by the late 1920s,the economic recession was beginning,causing the demand and prices of grapes to decline(Hofer 1983). Cucamonga Pioneer Winery The winery that would become the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was originally established as the California Wine Association (CWA) Winery in 1905.The CWA was a large company that administered wineries across the state, and built the Cucamonga winery to process the grapes of the local growers in 1905. The CWA constructed wood frame buildings on the winery, including the scale house, distillery,fermentation building, and a storage building,and a railroad spur of the Atkinson, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad. In 1916, CWA sold the winery to Garrett and Company of New York, who later purchased the Mission Winery in 1918, Garrett and Company used the winery for storage of their concentrates and tonics made at the Virginia Dare Winery and as a location to prepare their products for shipping(Hofer 1983). The declining grape prices during the late 1920s and early 1930s encouraged a group of Cucamonga grape growers to form a cooperative organization. In 1934,three past members of the Cucamonga Vintage Company, Hugh Thomas, Harry DeBerard, and Benton Ballou, along with George L. Belcher and Paul B. Hofer, established the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association (Association). The Association purchased the old CWA winery from Garrett and Company, and became the first cooperative organization in Cucamonga to own and operate its own winery.The original ten members of the Association were prominent and well-respected Cucamonga residents and grape growers,who hoped to become less dependent on commercial wineries. As the grape and wine market improved in the mid 1930s, the Association's cooperative would allow members to control prices,and as a cooperative,the Association were not required to pay federal income tax(Hofer 1983). Because Garrett and Company had utilized the winery exclusively for storage for almost 20 years, new machinery and improvements were necessary. The Association installed a new crusher, stemmer, and must pump and purchased pumps, hoses, and other equipment necessary to transport the wine from the fermentation building to the distillery or the storage building. Other improvements and purchases included new redwood fermenting and storage tanks, refrigeration equipment, and truck scales.The wine produced at the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was sold in bulk and shipped to markets by railroad tank cars, which was facilitated by the Santa Fe Railroad spur that was located on the winery property. Smaller amounts of barreled wine were sold locally, but the Association did not bottle any of their wine under its own label until 1940. The Association produced sweet and dry wines,sherry,and brandy(Hofer 1983;Daily Report 1941). By 1941,the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery had a storage capacity of more than 1,650,000 gallons and employed more than 45 employees. A 1941 newspaper article claimed that the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was "one of the famous co-operative wineries of the Cucamonga district"and was"the first such co-operative in this territory" (Daily Report 1941).The Association and the wine industry benefited from the repeal of prohibition, when wine consumption dramatically increased. However, by the late 1930s, the demand for sweet wine gradually decreased, leaving the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery with a surplus inventory of wine.When the Association was unable to sell their 1937 wine focally, they Association affiliated themselves with a nationwide marketing agent called California Wine Sales, Inc. to help them dispose of their wine to make room for the next years product. The Association continued their affiliation with California Wine Sales and were met with success until after World War 11. Between 1939 and 1947,the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery began bottling some of its own wine, but a majority of their wine sales remained bulk sales (Daily Report 1941; Hofer 1983). 9,96 APR 523J(1/95) Pioneer winery.doc "Required Information �State;�ot Cafi;arnisE , xThe�Re`s'ourcessAge,�cy � I��many :DEPAR�MEN1•�OF PARKS AN�D�'RECf�EA7lO H#� �i�r�pin`fal . _z .- �7C�fJNT1N�JA�JONRSHEEg : - Page 11 of 34 "Resource Identifier: 1 Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson `Date.21 April 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Cucamonga Pioneer Winery(continued) World War II was a prosperous time for the California wine industry. Prices increased due to a limited quantity of wine resulting in part from a governmental restriction. In order to meet govemmental marketing orders for raisins,the amount of grapes that would be crushed for wine was restricted. Returns to the Association's members were at an all time high during the war.After the war ended, wine inventories were again at surplus due to the revocation of wartime restrictions, low prices, and the post- war economy. Faced with a large inventory, the Association joined the Wine Growers Guild, which had formerly been California Wine Sales.The Wine Growers Guild combined all of its members wine and processed all of the wine orders out of their headquarters. This arrangement with the Wine Growers Guild took away much of the Association's independence and their affiliation with the Guild made filling local orders more difficult, causing the Association to lose local customers (Hofer 1983). in 1950, a fire in the wood frame storage building of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery destroyed the building, along with equipment and wine that was in storage.The Association managed to salvage some of the equipment and constructed a new, concrete and steel storage/cellar building with a 800,000 gallon storage capacity.The Wine Growers Guild had expanded and was one of the top five largest Cal'rfomia companies. Due to financial hardship and the growing industrial and commercial development of the Cucamonga area,many of the Association members either sold their ranches or delivered fewer grapes to the winery. By 1956, the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was not able to meet the production standards of the Wine Growers Guild, and in 1957 the Association officially withdrew from the Guild.The Association hoped to sell their wine locally—both to merchants and other wineries. Cucamonga Pioneer Winery kept their operation costs low by crushing grapes for other companies and also by selling their wine through the Brookside Winery(Hofer 19a3). In 1959, the Association's wine maker died, resulting in further cooperation with Brookside. Without their winemaker, the Association lacked the expertise to process their grapes into wine. The Brookside Winery, located on the former site of the Italian Vineyard Company, was forced to dismantle due to expansion of the Ontario airport. The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery.. purchased some of Brookside's equipment and moved it to their winery, and Brookside took over management of the Pioneer Winery. The remaining four members of the Association became members of the Brookside Vineyard Company and leased the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery to Brookside in 1960. By 1972, the Association's cooperative dissolved. Brookside continued to lease portions of the winery until 1975. Evaluation The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District was evaluated within the context of California and Cucamonga wineries during the first half of the twentieth century.The period of significance for the district has been defined as 1935 to 1950, during the active years of the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association at the winery.Although three of the extant properties (Map References A, C, and D) were constructed prior to the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association's ownership of the winery, the 1913 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map indicates that the floor plans of the Distillery and the Fermentation Building (Map References C and D)were changed slightly between their original construction and the Pioneer Winery improvements. Therefore,the extant winery buildings, including those constructed circa 1905, look today much as they did under the direction of the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association and retain integrity to the defined era of significance. Properties within the District that contribute to its significance include the Scale House, Boiler Building, Distillery, Fermentation Building, Storage/Cellar Building, Crusher and Rail Spur(Map References A, B, C, D, E, F,and 1). The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District appears to be eligible for listing in the CRHR under Criteria A. The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery was the first cooperatively owned winery in the Cucamonga Valley and the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association made significant contributions to the development of the Cucamonga grape and wine industry during the first half of the 2&century. The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District also appears to be eligible under Criteria B and C. Significant members of the community were members of the cooperative and were instrumental in its operation, including Hugh Thomas, Harry DeSerard, Benton Ballou, George L. Belcher and Paul B. Hofer. Also, the extant buildings are representative of winery construction in California during the first half of the twentieth century. The buildings retain integrity and despite some modem alterations and t deterioration due to age and misuse,the are representative of appearance of the wine during the era of significance. ., 9 Y P PP winery g g .. DPR 523J(1/95) Pioneer wlnery.doc 'Required information ate f auto n a Fie,Reso rces Ager>c Pr iris ry DEPA Tl1E AAIb#RECA�AT O H11T�i'nomial Page j�,,,., of 34 'Resource Identifier: 1 Recorded by- Kirsten Erickson *Date,21 April 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Evaluation(continued) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously identified the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery as a Potential Local, State, or National landmark, although formal evaluation was not previously completed (City of Rancho Cucamonga 1994). The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery is locally significant as a cooperative winery whose members were well-known citizens of the Cucamonga area. The extant buildings are a physical representation of the once thriving wine industry and the first member owned cooperative winery in the Cucamonga area. S i DPR 523J(1/95) Plon®er_winery.doc 'Required Information of Gali farrsaihe Rssos�rces�i4gency s` Pljrrsary t..7.srtiiL-,a ' S G.s`r�+e•Y�Y�r�f•T yu�.T'�Y� 4 t Z,� ,•^••7 Y � nr�,&,= �-.+^'Cva`yG�'� �:+-^v^r.�.•tf.sC7,.0:��caa-'•�• w��.l F s ,�� � j2i/�� ����'■��'�V,l i` v k,. �, M-inomid .r,.�a?��•,�.ic-�'1si�+w:{s.rYa..r'�'.C�'...+�.:=`.•::wr:�r.r.'.:o .w,'.-;.;�-C-•�'r^L,T;_.,. _ ._+.s:`.,�..w i'_._..., -: ._,o. �-;..�. __ :., � ..:�...r,�,.o-..r .,.,.;.t .. ..�. Page 13 of 34 *Resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District *Recorded by: A.Wesson, C.Hacking, and K. Erickson *Date Recorded: April 2a, 2003 ®Continuation ©Update N � LaK / �, r i✓ I N e Y H sr Lr 6 x:Sr -12, _ ,o HAVEN AV. ��nnstrti�x.aW rra r� CUCJ9hfOJMGf� - /-=rf w /char E. P/' /!.T• 4 S•t'D�Ppr, • �sce o.n w mcc Ch ecrrt• rttac rrcw[ � [i /� / QQ�.x•rt aivc,vt ncrsJlc LYx / '• } r.tseeiot.. / /uw.ace StR;et Fiu+�c.i x`raesw• A. ir �1 j7rilsC ,i/9p. !/ �'rta r r/ :aysccv++.r5r.rtrrer.ec+�rw..+ OR r+w.t-�O /ram /J feJ rYYan/r,iy Rm�� iF r.: 1 p �I , [ .riw kr 1011�' �r % rerm rnf:`aQ Ha. r 1 tl i + �• sr carer L_ 1 E r l „�.�.�,.. I '�� �c � 1/J++w C�,y Pq/•.�'�t'6:>."^ra. • �rs•!a�•nm+r« �e�i � ]k, 4 w.=�artw pR .,... • } O 1 Y r ` t-y--�_ -ii.pJsrceEsrr ry 39� � s a..: 6 I d/ilpp.iry Rn�~ � 64 41 gApn+v7. 4 ��tJw Sl1 x C CI y. N!mrlurrwv•ne+erx`=:f•zrr-^^c.-^zri:rnsaeox.. t !�p wru. � i 1 � :.3rlJ-tK f,wrJlrXS.••Fnrr�,DaYr.+{n}r-r I'PwKIZ. � .hG.�.e rwrlt:.•r aysrpra r•frri cacti.mu� I j �` � i 1 .•1nR'a•XtJMS{'Aer rY,rayon•^IIY3u IYfNrTY/4 M- ItJ'fnw♦%Ow-e+r'+w8'Phrer'T H lnvc(A K M.rem Lrrs MAW enw.r! nwwm r/2•wrat'YJ s#vl-rr'wer /:•/cvr rahN.f�. '!f'C JOU'J:t".eieln nary.tf4Y.'. f } aw'rom oft,r+ a �9'w'T.yf. p...T r:�„ •F(i'L.'«. ..... _ +w•.r.....+sw 7•-n It c i 1 z rr. � 1 � J14isny Sla3/c. � L� t Q 1 N .fj rNw- wt *Not to Scale r3. t7l. xt t w MARINE E AV. Figure 1:Detail of the 1913 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Map of"Guastit'. This map depicts portions of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District. if e a (Callffl nia .. he Resotarcr~saA enc. Pr. a }r � �h:ld tr T s�:Yws r4 S'++d,SS R . EPAF TMEN P QF�'PA'RKS AfVD} 3ECREA'I tON rintsriila Y: ARC 'E ED, C3IRD Page 14 of 34 *Resource Name or#(Assigned by Recorder) _Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District *A1. Dimensions: a. length 230 m (N/S) x b. Width 197 m{EM Method of Measurement: ❑ Paced ❑Taped ❑Visual estimate ® Other: GPS/Mapping _ Method of Determination(Check any that apply,): ®Artifacts ❑ Features ❑Soil ❑ Vegetation ❑Topography ❑ Cut bank ❑Animal burrow ❑ Excavation ® Property boundary ❑ Other(Main): Reliability of Determination: [] High ® Medium [:] Low Explain: Limitations(Check any that apply). ❑ Restricted access ® Pavedlbuilt aver ❑ Site limits incompletely defined ® Disturbances ❑Vegetation ❑ Other(Explain): A2. Depth: ❑ None ® Unknown Method of Determination: *A3. Human Remains: ❑ Present❑Absent❑ Possible® Unknown(Explain):Unlikely due to the nature of the resource. *A4. Features: (Number,briefly describe,indicate size, list associated cultural constituents,and show location of each feature on sketch map.): Four loci and two isolates were recorded. Please refer to A5—Cultural Constituents. *A5. Cultural Constituents: (Describe and quantify artifacts,ecofacts,cultural residues,etc.,not associated with features.) Locus 1:This historic artifact scatter is located on the north side of a concrete tank at the northern periphery of the winery parcel. Artifacts within the scatter consisted of white decorated earthenware fragments,as well as fragments of brown, green,olive,and clear container glass. Other artifacts included unidentifiable metal objects, nails, bottle tops,staples, bolts,screws,and pull-tops from beer cans. Locus 2:This historic artifact scatter is located around a circular concrete water tank in the northwest comer of the winery parcel. Artifacts within the scatter consisted of white decorated earthenware fragments,as well as fragments of cobalt, brown,green,olive, pink,clear,and"milW within the scatter glass. Other artifacts included brick fragments, unidentifiable metal fragments,coils,barbed wire,modem beer bottles, bottle caps, roof sheeting, an old five-rang ladder, and pull-tops from beer cans. See Continuation Sheet. *A6. Were Specimens Collected?® No❑Yes (If yes,attach Artifact Record or catalog and identify where specimens are curated.) *A7. Site Condition: ❑ Good ® Fair ❑ Poor (Describe disturbances.): The resource has been disturbed by v: plowing/discing. Several structures are no longer present that were known to have been in existence in 1913 (based on Sanborn Map). *A8. Nearest Water: (Type, distance,and direction.) Deer Creek is located approx. 457 meters (1499 feet) to the southwest of the Winery. The Cucamonga Creek is located approximately 2.4 kilometers(7999 feet)to the west of the site location. *A9. Elevation: 1150 feet above mean sea level. A10. Environmental Setting: (Describe culturally relevant variables such as vegetation, fauna, soils, geology, landform, slope, aspect, exposure,etc.)The area is a relatively flat agricultural area. NO native habitat exists in the vicinity. Soils are light brown silty sands (Quaternary alluvial fan deposits). All. Historical Information:A historic artifact scatter(temporarily recorded as HA-1) is located approx.25 meters (82 feet)to the south of the District. A historic railroad spur(temporarily recorded as HA-2) is located approx.75 meters (246 feet) to the south of the District. Resource HA-2 ties into an east-west running railroad track recorded as P-36-006847 (a portion of the historic Kite-Shaped Track/Belt Line), that connected portions of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. *Al2. Age: ❑ Prehistoric❑ Protohistoric❑ 1542.1769❑ 1769-1848❑ 1848-1880® 1880-19141@ 1914-1945 ® Post 1945 ❑ Undetermined Describe position In regional prehistoric chronology or factual historic dates If known. Amethyst glass was produced between 1880-1916. Maywood Glass Co. makers marks(circa 1958). Gallo Glass CO. makers marks(1966 or later). A13. Interpretations: (Discuss data potential, function[s], ethnic affiliation, and other interpretations) Loci 1 and 2 appear to date to post 1945, based on makers marks, although older deposits may underlie the surface. Locus 3, a sparse brick scatter, contained no diagnostic artifacts and is not considered a potential contributor. The bricks may be the remains of a water tank(no longer extant) shown in the same general location on the 1913 Sanborn Map. Locus 4 is very rich and dense for a surface scatter, and contains a wide variety of domestic artifacts. Locus 4 may date to the late 1800's or early 1900's,as amethyst was observed. See Continuation Sheet. A14. Remarks: Only the eastern edge of Locus 3 will be impacted by construction associated with the Haven Avenue Grade Separation Project. Locus 3 does not appear to be eligible for the CRHR individually or as a contributor to the District. A15. References: (Documents, informants, maps, and other references) California State Engineering Department, Detail Irrigation Map, Ontario Sheet, (Irrigation Data, 1888); Glass Bottles:Bask Identification(Jim Rock, 1981);Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Map"Guasti"(1913). A16. Photographs(List subjects,direction of view,and accession numbers or attach a Photograph Record.): Original Media/Negatives kept at: URS Corporation, 2020 East First St., Ste. 400, Santa Ana, CA 92705 *A17. Form Prepared by A. Wesson and C. Hacking Date: 23 April 2003 Affiliation and Address: URS Corporation, 2020 East first St., Ste. 400, Santa Ana, CA 92705 _ DPR 523C (1/95) *Required Information State of Callfomia—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 15 of 31 *Resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District *Recorded by:A. Wesson and C. Hacking *Date Recorded 21 Agri 2003_ ®Continuation ❑ Update *A5. Cultural Constituents (Continued) Locus 3:This sparse historic artifact scatter is located in the southeastern quadrant of the winery parcel, in a plowed field south of the boiler building. Artifacts within the scatter consisted mainly of brick fragments and a few unidentifiable metal fragments. Locus 4:This historic artifact scatter extends along the entire western perimeter of the winery parcel. The scatter also extends along the western half of the southern perimeter of the parcel. Artifacts within this scatter are similar to those found in Loci 1 and 2, however amethyst glass was noted in the artifact deposits along the boundaries of the property line. Most of the artifacts were observed between the perimeter fence and the paved surface of Marine Avenue and Humbolt Avenue. These artifacts may be associated with the Boarding House (no longer extant) shown on the 1913 Sanborn Fire Insurance Company map in the west central portion of the winery parcel (page 13). Isolate A consists of a fragment of amethyst container glass. Isolate B consists of a ceramic sailor doll's head. *A13. Interpretations (Continued) Locus 4 may be associated with the Boarding House shown on the 1913 Sanborn Map near the western perimeter of the parcel. Loci 1, 2, and 4 are considered potentially contributing elements to the District. They have not been tested/evaluated, but they may contain intact primary archaeological deposits eligible for CRHR inclusion under Criterion D. Figure 3: Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyards, Southern California, Neck Label. Found outside the western wall of the Fermentation Building (Figure 4: Map Reference D). i vu. � 5 DPR 523L (1195) *Required information State of Callfomla—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Pagq 16 of 31 *Resource Name or (Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Pioneer Winer_v District *Recorded by:A. Wesson and C. Hacking *Date Recorded 21 April 2003 Continuation Update TIN I OR-0 so CAL iW Figure 3: Bottle body label. Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyards, Southern California, Port Wine, Cucamonga District. Found outside the western wall of the Fermentation Building (Figure 4: Map Reference D). ` Figure 4: Bottle body label: Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyards, Southern California, Zinfandel Wine, Cucamonga District. Found outside the western wall of the Fermentation Building (Figure 4: Map Reference CA. DPR 523L(1/95) *Required Information � State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 17 of 34 `Resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District *Recorded by:A- Wesson and C. Hacking *Date Recorded 21 April 2003 ® Continuation ❑ Update IM _ ��4V`7• .� .+p i��6�z�,,,�,� 5}.., fie.,. Figure 5: Overview of Locus 1, view to the east _� "! - r" r,}' � .�� T-3�a��it��= w"yr�L•' w � 'rYp , 'ter- �' +..i `+ x. ,� �e'�'""�L'r•S.`..,;yPii�,,i+_'w� - `:nS ✓l: ,r, ,..'s:. ..r.',��`y�c�-tr A+ y erg �f .w ,.'KSfJ s xy�Y ri �'i•'�iSIJ�'q�.• T�. �_1�� y lye { ,'{ ,•• J t1q f7 �1 -�' .._ '9"'rki ,::..; `^Z. iX� Z; r A. .3-v vTom. �YiHi�(• 'rF3+i.xr « i ems`•. 1 _�'� S'1�Te��1 A Lt" ��." ItS.,4J��-1" '�•.'t'rrr i>> � Ti � f- � �' �.1 r Y 1+ Figure 6: Representative sample of artifacts from Locus 1 DPR 523L(1/95) *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial a Page 18 of 34 'Resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District *Recorded by:A. Wesson and C. Hacking *Date Recorded 21 April 2003 ® Continuation ❑ Update ,„ _Au'15 Pm 6 f�' '�`'.�#��� � � '.r` fit*��s��� •��. Cs 5� (`''—�'��y��A^�.,w•l��ul �'� � �-`�'i'+�'��r� �� _�� to -a z ��;$ - +^. �;li¢-+.�'��•��,'�' 4•.'' :s„+` '"'z' to - � -r �'�,a. n �Zr' •�. � -4;�ys�e 4a'Y'T[CY^.yf�e4. �.. t v�. rlpR5 *a�:.tf'JJtr.-=x.,.-+-+iasbr���,�:� w. y _ � }M��.•"r'�k.,v:�•,ry , �' T��`!:',.�. .r �. ,f y; .,�.5!•Y�,�,�, 5-`"�r�l. 1v � _, � }4 � 4�.e°Y'2'^R �„-.�sS:,'kVX "�'" '", t�ih.Ylysa�':�a:�7w-i� lT►wa �t'� _�w+l•? � Figure 7: Overview of Locus 2, view to the south !1 lT its a'€•car � �ni ; � �„f y e r x `f 53 Figure 8: Representative sample of artifacts from Locus 2 DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial Page 19- of 34 'Resource Name or#(Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District *Recorded by:A. Wesson and C. Hacking *Date Recorded 21 April 2003_ ®Continuation ❑ Update rh ii .. W 1 s7frMi 7.:a.. ��'• y�+, { sri °t,e°Yt`.s ail ., t a t¢s� r'Ti,4-,. o°r, r ° �7r � � �a�� z'3T' �-t yM r t-<d a rJ�; i � ; ; �v S g,/�S s��,'7 4 ?YC`.Y•.Ir�a 4 is~ i�G' " ' ,�vG. ��^�'iE F•s�5 2 s' 6= �� �4Fr �n`"I��yS ,atr _ Y�". .i• �+��, .ri"+C:- � r-�t � ��,�. '! o8ya1 Yi � ��,,. ��c¢`'rsr r a ay . M u� •1. u' �.+,s�-.H��'":r�' F {�Sf��..r.': t ig' yi` �•� ,�.y i'ff f ti.�h '� 4�Sr�:e �;.*��- -^zM .'7',�- 'U'C..:'�'4, 7•: xG r��.S,.a�gY�rs�9Fsr3.'1:.ri�n�r'�..6fi�4. �I,F�S.. Figure 9: Ceramic sailor doll head (Isolate 8) DPR 523L(1195) *Required information 1 State of Callfomia—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3D Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 20 of 34 *Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) A P1. Other identifier: Scale House P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti Date 1966(1981) T 1S; R 7W; 5E'/. of SE'/of Sec 11 ; 1208 B.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 mE/ mN *e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 209-131-02 ' *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and boundaries) The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery property, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring approximately 700- by 600-feet. The scale house is located on the east side of the winery near the gate that faces Haven Avenue. The scale house is a one-story, wood frame building with a concrete slab foundation.The building faces east and has a rectangular shape. The exterior wall surface is horizontal wood siding and the side gable roof has exposed rafter ends and is clad with composition shingles. The single entry on the front of the building has a wood surround and has been boarded over.•There is a shed roof porch over the door that has a wood floor and a shed roof supported by wood posts. The windows are wood framed double hung and casement windows with wood sills and surrounds. Several of the windows have been boarded over.There are metal awnings over some of the windows. See continuation sheet *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (HP8) Industrial building, (HP6) Commercial building under 3 stones *P4. Resources Present:X Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District X Element of District ❑ Other P5a. Photo or Drawing P5b. Description of Photo: (View,date,accession#) View northwest 21 Aoril 2003 �- - *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: X Historic ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Circa 1905-1910 411 (Hofer 1983, Sanbom maps 1913 w and 1929) *P7. Owner and Address: Paul Hofer {' 11274 S.Turner i Ontario, California 91761 i *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,and address) Kirsten Erickson URS Co -- 7720 N. 16 Street, Ste 100 - Phoenix.Ariz ona 85020 - *Pg. Date Recorded: _ 21 April 2003 P10.Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive survey P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Wesson Alex. Christine Hackimi.and Kirsten Erickson, 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Studv Appendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical Rel2ort. URS Corporation, Santa Ana. *Attachments: ❑ NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure and Object Record ❑ Archaeological Record ❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑ Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other(List) DPR 523A(1/95) PW—Adoc *Required Information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRifTrinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Page 21 of 34 *Resource Identifier: A Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson *Date 21 April 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Description (continued) There is a shed roof extension on the south side of the building,which served as a service window for the truck scale.The roof of the extension has exposed rafters and is clad with composition shingles.The public window has an aluminum awning over a boarded over window. There are also windows on the east and west sides of the extension, which are also boarded over. All windows on the extension have wood sills and surrounds. The truck scale is located to the south of the building. It is 20 feet long and has a concrete base and a metal frame. The scale itself is constructed of wood planks, which are joined with bolts and metal. There are three windows on the west side of the building that have been boarded over. All of the windows have aluminum awnings and wood frames, sills, and surrounds. There is one, wood, paneled door with one light, which has been partially boarded over.The single entry is accessed by two concrete steps_ The only features on the north side of the building are two windows that have been boarded over. These windows also have wood frames,sills, and surrounds. The Scale House is depicted on the 1913 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, indicating it was constructed by the CWA in 1905.The scale house likely served as an administrative area,as well as the place were truck weights were recorded. - y `may �U,1r•r�,f r y �""� 'i FL 7 �„��""'f�. 'I. i4l _ '_ _ _ ,.� - 4�,'s_-.A•�•'"`4�F.�- -+� ,,x " III y_. _ . •/ Y t l � > ti 4 "C kK � ?Y'Gr Y' 1 "�Y'7�I�a j• d'ft ��Y �>e'.. -^'Y4n�+� Truck Scale (view west) 'Required Information State of California--The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code D Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 22 of 34 *Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) B P1. Other Identifier: Boiler Buildin P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e,and 132b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.) "b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti Date 1966(1981) T 1S; R 7W; SE'/.g of SE`/t of Sec 11 ; 1208 B.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga _ Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large andfor linear resources) Zone 11 : mE/ mN *e. Other L.ocational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 209-131-02 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and fts major elements, Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and bounderiies) The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery District, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring approximately 700-by 600-feet.The boiler building is located on the east side of the winery, east of the distillery. The boiler building is a one and a half story, masonry stmicture with a concrete slab foundation. The front gable roof is clad with corrugated metal and has exposed rafter ends.There is a paired set of vents located in each gable end, which are each made up of six square openings (2 over 4, stacked). The front entrance consists of two, sliding, metal doors on a metal track. Two window openings on the front of the building have been sealed with brick. There are two, metal smokestacks on the roof of the building. The smokestacks are located just south of the middle of the roof, with one on each side of the ridgeline. On the west side of the building,two window openings have been bricked in and there is one sliding metal door with a metal track. There are three bricked in window openings on the east side and one bricked in window opening on the south side. At the northwest comer of the building lies an oval-cylindrical wooden tank labeled 'Brrokside Vineyard Co.". *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (HP8)Industrial buildint7 P4. Resources Present:X Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District X Element of District" ❑ Other P5a. Photo or Drawing P5b. Description of Photo: (View,date,accession#) View south �— 21 April 2003 _-__-- *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: X Historic ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Circa 1936 (Hofer 1983;Sanborn rmggs 1913 and 1929 *P7. Owner and Address: .� Paul Hofer 11274 S.Turner ' 3 r i ems' Ontario, _Califomia 91761 *P8. Recorded by: (Name. ' affiliation,and address) u- -a Kirsten Erickson URS Conp d y _ ' 7720 N. 16 n Street, Ste 100 Phoenix.Arizona 85020 *P9. Date Recorded: 21 April 2003 ..� ;'{i'k�^�•,:�� ��,+),.,�sr -�1/"' 'j;1'�rE-ti.`��•"'� �, "S y-:n�ra ,�'at"4 � •�; '� •P10. Survey Type:(Describe) 7 y" -. ': +•;1s x iM i' �,..a.s `,}aF? b;: ;,^s .t `;S'., i�f.. ti..1a�3 �. Intensive survey P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and othersources,or enter"none".) Wesson. Alex. Christine Hackino, and Kirsten Erickson 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Study Aguendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical Report, URS Corporation, Santa Ana. *Attachments: ❑ NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map ❑Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure and Object Record ❑ Archaeological Record ❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other(List) DPR 523J(1195) PW_B.doc 'Required Information # State of California---The Resources Agency Primary DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Stratus Code D Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 23 of 34 *Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) C P1. Other Identifier: Distillery P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966(198`11 T 1 S; R 7W; SE'/. of SE'/.of Sec 11 ; 1208 B.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga — mE/ 91730 mN d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 *e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 209-131-02 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and boundaries) The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery District, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring approximately 700-by 600-feet.The boiler building is located on the east side of the winery, south of the fermentation building and west of the boiler building. The Distillery is a one and one half story, wood frame building with a three-story tower. The building's foundation is an concrete slab and the exterior wall surface is redwood board and batten siding. The front gable roof is clad with standing seam metal and composition roil.There is a single entry, metal door and a metal sliding track door on the front of the building. The windows on the front of the building are wood frame, double hung windows with wood frames and surrounds, which have been barred and boarded over.These windows appear to have originally been six-over-six light windows, however, many of the muntins are missing. See continuation sheet *123b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (HP8) Industrial building - *P4. Resources Present:X Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District X Element of District ❑ Other P5b. Description of Photo: P5a. Photo or Drawing mew,date,accession#) View south 21 April 2003 _ *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: X Historic . ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Circa 1905-1910 (Hofer 1983:Sanbom maps 1913 r and 1929) *P7. Owner and Address: �1�. Paul Hofer t 11274 S.Turner ' = Ontario, California 91761 i "-' •+ * *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,and address) Kirsten Erickson, URS Cott _ 7720 N. 16 Street, Ste 100 - s ) � Phoenix Arizona 85020 t �Ii *P9. Date Recorded: _,...._,.,,: ..:...<,:.. 21 Auril2003 *P10.Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive survey — P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Wesson Alex Christine Hacking.and Kirsten Erickson.2003. Haven Avenue Grade Separation initial Study A pendix l3: DRAFT Cu]#ural Resaurces Technical Report. URS Corporation. Santa Ana. *Attachments: ❑ NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure and Object Record ❑ Archaeological Record ❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑ Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other(List) 9_3� DPR 523A(1/95) PW C.doc *Required Information State of Califomia—The Resources Agency Primaryf# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRlti rinvmiai CONTINUATION SHEET Page 24 of 34 'Resource Identifier: C Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson *Date 21 April 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Description (continued) The window and door openings on the south side of the building have been boarded over or covered with metal. There is a wood, sliding door that is reinforced with metal on the east side of the building. On the west side, there is one single entry metal door and one wood sliding door that is reinforced with metal. There are also two, double hung, wood frame windows with wood sills and surrounds.The glass has been removed from the windows. There is a tower located on the southwest comer of the building, which housed the still. The window openings in the three story tower are empty or have been boarded over. There is a visor roof extending out from all four sides of the tower, which is located about half way up the tower or at the top of the second story of the tower. The roof of the tower is a side gable roof. Both the visor and gable roofs are clad with composition material. �3 DPR 523J(1/95) PW C.doc 'Required Information IIfornia—The Resources A State of Ca Agency Prima # 9 Y Primary DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRl# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code D Other Listings Review Code Reviewer ]"late Page 25 of 34 *Resource Name or#:—(As signed by recorder) D P1. Other Identifier: Fermentation Buildin P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach Location]Nap as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti Date 1966(19811 T 1S; R 7W; SE'/4 of SE'/4 of Sec 11 ; 1208 B.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 mE/ mN *e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 209-131-02 *P3a. Description: (describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and boundaries) The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery District, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring approximately 700- by 600-feet. The fermentation building is located on the northeast comer of the winery property, north of the distillery and boiler building and west of the crusher. The fermentation building is a one and one half story,wood frame building with a concrete slab foundation.The exterior wall surface is red wood board and batten siding. The front gable roof is clad with composition material covered with corrugated metal and has exposed rafter ends. Six vents are located on the roof at the ridgeline.There are two, sliding door openings on the front of the building. The doors have been removed and, at one time, were replaced with a grouping of windows. The door openings are currently boarded over, but remnants of wood frame screens are still visible.There are concrete ramps located below both door openings. Metal pipes protrude from the front of the building, which extend across the yard and into the distillery building.These pipes are supported by two vertical, metal poles. See continuation sheet *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (HP81 Industrial building *P4. Resources Present:X Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District X Element of District ❑ Other P5a. Photo or Drawing P5b. Description of Photo: (View,date,accession#) View northwest 21 April 2003 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: X Historic _ ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Circa 1905-1910 (Hofer 1983: Sanborn maps 1913 and 1929) *P7. Owner and Address: ------ -�--� .;� l Paul Hofer Nit l t ! 11274 S.Tumer Ontario.California 91761 *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,and address) Kirsten Erickson Corm URS Co _ _ VJ 7720 N. 16"Street. Ste 100 r. . f r...;,. Phoenix,Arizona850_2D__ *P9, Date Recorded. 21 April 2003 _ �;;�,y�t.r �:�C..� ' ^ d��•Ge i� Y�'�`K �4f'�r5 _rw .�;,;r�„�sj��i��a -- f *P10. Survey Type:(Describe) Intensive survey P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Wesson. Alex, Christine Hacking.and_Kirsten Erickson.2003. Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Study Appendix B:_DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical Report URS Corporation, Santa Ana. *Attachments: ❑ NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure and Object Record ❑ Archaeological Record ❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑ Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other(List) DPR 523A(1/95) PW_D.doc *Required Information es �� :SfaYaf�Ga]itTarr�ia, The Rsot�rc Ager�c� ` ?x � _, , ,Primary a CO ITINUAx;TiL 1t'SHEEN 1� ;; � �r � _ e tq , Page 26 of 34 'Resource Identifier. D Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson *Date 21 012003 X Continuation ❑ Update Description(continued) There are two sliding wood doors on the rear of the building with metal tracks.A lean-to extension is located on the northwest comer of the building, which has a shed roof that is clad with standing seam metal. There is a sliding wood door on the west side of the lean-to extension .An engine protrudes from the back wall of the building, which is supported by wood brackets. There are no windows on the rear of the building. Two sliding wood door openings are located on the east side of the building. The doors have a metal upper track, a wood base, and a wood door surround. Metal pipes protrude from the east side of the building and extend to the west side of the or-usher building. There are two sliding wood doors on the west side of the building. There are remnants of a shed rooted structure that was attached to the north end of the west side of the building, which may have sheltered equipment. There is an existing shed- roofed structure near the south end of the west side, which serves as a shelter sump pumps. The pumps were located in concrete box structures that are mostly located beneath the ground surface. The shed roof shelter has a corrugated metal roof.There is also an engine mounted near the roofline on the west side of the building. 3G DPR 523J(1/95) PW D.doo `Required Information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code D Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 27 of 34 *Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) E P1. Other Identifier: Storage/Cellar Buildin P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966(1981) T 1S; R 7W; SE'/, of SE'/.of Sec 11 ; 1208 B.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 mE/ mN *e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 209-131-02 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and boundaries) The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring approximately 700-by 600-feet near the northwest corner of Haven and Humboldt Avenues.The storage/cellar building is located in the northwest portion of the winery property,west of the fermentation building. The storage/cellar building has two stories and faces east. It is constructed of poured concrete and has a concrete foundation. The exterior wall surface is exposed poured concrete and the roof is flat.There is a lower roofed extension or addition on the front of the building, which is entered through a metal, sliding track door. Four, nine4ight awning windows with metal frames are located on the front of the building.The windows have cast concrete sills and there is an aluminum awning located over one of the windows. There are letters mounted to the front of the building spelling "Brookside Vineyard Co. 13 39."Metal pipes protrude from the front of the building and extend across the yard and enter into the fermentation building.The pipes are supported by metal towers. See continuation sheet.. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP8 Industrial building *P4. Resources Present:X Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District X Element of District ❑ Other P5a. Photo or Drawing P5b. Description of Photo: (View,date,accession#} View west 21_April 2003 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: X Historic ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Circa 1950 (Hofer 1983,Sanborn reaps 1913 a—vy t,1•.�,tY� yr i•r and 1929) *P7. Owner and Address: Paul Hofer 11274 S.Turner h a Z1 Ontario, California 91761 H ti�` re, ^ *P8. Recorded by: (Name, ne rx- affiliation,and address) t. Y :m.a 77 t K' Kirsten Erickson, URS Corp 7720 N. 16'r Street.Ste 100 '.•,SF - Phoenix Arizona 85020 17 *P9. Date Recorded: � 16 , '�" � 21 April 2003 . *P10.Survey Type:e.(Describe) Intensive_survey_ P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Wesson.Alex, Christine Hacking,and Kirsten Erickson, 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Study Appendiix_B DRAFT Cultural Resources_Technical Report. URS Corporation Santa Ana *Attachments: ❑ NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure and Object Record ❑ Archaeological Record ❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑ Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other(List) DPR 523A(1/95) PW_E.doe *Required Information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OP'PARKS AND RECREATION HRI/Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET .. Page 28 of 34 "Resource Identifier: E Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson "Date 21 April 2003_ X Continuation ❑ Update Description(continued) There are four windows on the south side of the building—three metal framed hopper windows with 16 lights and one metal framed, 3-light hopper window. The hopper window has a cast concrete sill, a wood surround and is covered with a metal security grille. There are also two doors on the south side—one, wood paneled, single entry door near the east end of the south side and one, metal sliding door with a metal track and a concrete ramp.There is also a metal single entry door located within the sliding door. The entry on the north side is a metal double entry door. There are also two large openings that have been sealed with concrete on the north side.A concrete slab is located to the north of the building and photographs taken in the 1980s indicate that a portion of the concrete slab was the foundation to a wood frame shed that was attached to the north side of the storage/cellar building. There are round, wood structures supported by concrete bases located on the concrete slab to the north of the former shed location and a pipe runs from the fermentation building to the vicinity of the wood structures.This area may have been used to fill barrels for shipping. NT 5^-y..�. �k:' ,ns g xPh ti is -''}} i "s 1ti�t.G'a' 5. �, ,a rr p j.:�•*_ {. � �,w�r�� �Ft�n'"i3 A� ,F ✓F-�s:i4�`-,gri'� `�,.. n`yf.�: North Side of the StoragefCellar Building(view southeast) A t .0 N Wood Structures Located North of the Storage/Cellar Building DPR 528J(1195) PYtf_E.doc *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code D Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 29 of 34 *Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) F P1, Other Identifier: Crusher P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Dale 1966 119811 T 1S; R 7W; SE% of 5E of Sec 11 : 1208 B.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City _Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 mE/ mN *e. Other I_ocational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 209-131-02 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and boundaries) The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery, which is iocated on a rectangular lot measuring approximately 700- by 600-feet near the northwest comer of Haven and Humboldt Avenues. The crusher is located in the eastern portion of the winery property,east of the fermentation building and north of the scale house. The one story crusher building has a frame constructed of iron and wood,and is anchored to a concrete slab.The sides of the building and gable roof of the building are corrugated metal and the roof has exposed rafter ends. There are conveyors extending from the north and south sides of the building, which empty into large concrete dumping pits. A truck conveyor and truck loading area are located on the east side of the building. The building shelters the crusher mechanism and electrical boxes that once controlled the crusher, conveyors, sump pumps, and must pump. An iron pipe extends from the roof of the crusher to the east side of the fermentation building. See continuation sheet *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) (HP8) Industrial building *P4. Resources Present:X Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District X Element of District ❑ Other P5a. Photo or Drawing P5b. Description of Photo: mew,date,accession#} °.`• View west 21 April 2003 ,,. *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: X Historic �`" ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Circa 1936 (Hofer 1983; Sanborn mans 1913 and 1929) ,'k t *P7. Owner and Address: Paul Hofer 11274 S.Turner in "• I - Ontario, California_91761 *P8. Recorded by: (Name, e �r .,t •R� f; a� ''yn._y x1 x ., affiliation,and address) :,{SiFi4' 4.8 ,. Kirsten Erickson, URS Corp 7720 N. 16 Street, Ste 100 Phoenix,Arizona 85020 *P9. Date Recorded: '. x 21 April 2003 *P10.Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive survey P11. Report Citation*: Cie survey and other sources,or enter"none".) Wesson.Alex, Christine Hacking,and irsten Erickson. 2003.,Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Study Appendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technicalt Report. URS Co Santa Ana - -- - *Attachments: ❑ NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure and Object Record ❑ Archaeological Record ❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑ Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other(List) DPR 523A(1/95) PW_F.doc *Required Information State of California ' The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI/Trinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Page 30 of 34 *Resource Identifier: F Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson *Date 21 April 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Description(continued) y 1qJ! �kyf f�ti� } �� t•T � �• 1 4 n,. jt• 3r I '.Y:, •; - F).,. 4� i 'i'' �:.t� r i Tat �. •��-�m ��-��`��� , .•.ram;�'{{��ff o „g Concrete Dumping Pit(view northwest) � � •hR .. �,,,��: .age �L'>'-"�'��3' ..�- .�v. Detail of Crusher Mechanism (view west) ZZA _ / V - - - DPR 523J(1195) Pw_FAoc *Required Information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 31 of 34 *Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) G P1. Other Identifier. WaterTank P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Guasti Date 1966 (1981) T 1 S; R. 7W ; SE'/. of SE%of Sec 11 ; 1208 S.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone _11 mE! mN *e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 209-131-02 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and boundaries) The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring approximately 700- by 600-feet near the northwest comer of Haven and Humboldt Avenues. The water tank is located in the northwest comer of the winery complex. The water tank is constructed of poured concrete.The building is circular and once had a wood frame roof with wood shingles,which is mostly collapsed. Rebar rungs attached to the south side of the tank provide ladder access to the interior of the water tank.There is an associated outbuilding to the south of the tank that may have served as a motor or pump shed. It is a square,concrete block building with pipes running through the walls and along the floor.The wood framed hipped roof is clad with composition material and has exposed rafter ends.The door has been removed and there is a wire mesh transom opening above the doorway. Electrical boxes are attached to the interior walls. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) _(HPS) Industrial building *Pa. Resources Present:X Building ❑Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District X Element of District ❑ Other P5a. Photo or Drawing P5b. Description of Photo: (View,date,accession#) View northeast 21 April 2003 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: X Historic ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Circa 1936-1950 Lofer_1983,_Sanbom maps 1913 and1929) *P7. Owner and Address: Paul Hofer 11274 S.Turner Ontario, California 91761 *P8. Recorded by: (Name, f _ --rr affiliation,and address) "`' Kirsten Erickson, UR5 Corp uE u .� .. �, �` 7720 N. 16 Street, Ste 100 Phoenix,Arizona 85020 � *P9. Date Recorded: 21 April 2003 ■■ - -�.:. �. -� , ,.r� '`` �, �- *P10.Survey Type:(Describe) Intensive survey P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none'.) Wesson.Alex. Christine Hacking. and Kirsten Erickson 2003. Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Study Appendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical Report. URS Corporation, Santa Ana. *Attachments: ❑ NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map ❑ Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure and Object I Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other(List) Aw DPR 523J(1195) PW_G.doc *Required Information State of California---The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial 1 NRHP Status Code 1 Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 32 of 34 *Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) H P1. Other Identifier: House P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino (172c,P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti Date ._1966_(1981) T 1S; R 7W; SE'/. of SE%of Sec 11 ; 1208 B.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 mE/ mN *e. Other Locationai Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,-elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 209-131-02 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and Its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and boundaries) The building is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring approximately 700- by 600-feet near the northwest comer of Haven and Humboldt Avenues. The residence is located near the center of the winery property,just south of the cellar/storage building. The one-story,wood frame residence faces north and has a concrete foundation.The exterior wall surface is horizontal siding.The front gable roof and shed roof extension are clad with composition roll.The front entry is a single entry, wood, paneled door with a gable roofed entry porch supported by wood posts.The windows are one-over-one,wood sash, double hung windows with wood sills and surrounds-2 on the front,2 on the east,and 3 on the south side.There are vents in both gable ends:A wood frame shed is attached to the west shed extension of the house,which has a plywood exterior wall surface and a corrugated metal roof.There is one single entry door in the shed. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) (HP2J.Sin le farriiv prop.-erty *P4. Resources Present:X Building ❑ Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District X Element of District ❑ Other P5b. Description of Photo: PSa. Photo or Drawing (View,date,accession#) View southwest 21 April 2003 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and a._ - Source: X Historic .� ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Yy; - Circa 1940-1950(estimated)____ iti. 3' *P7. Owner and Address: Paul Hofer �-' 11274 S.Turner Ontario. Califomia 91761 *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,and address) .: Kirsten Erickson, URS Coro 7720 N. 16 Street,_Ste-100_ - Phoenix.Arizona 85020 y ' *PS. Date Recorded: T 21 April 2003 ., *P10.Survey Type: (Describe) .:. r. a Intensive survey P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Wesson,Alex, Christine Hacking, Kirsten _Erickson, 2003 Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Study Appendix B: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical Report. URS Corporation, Santa Ana. *Attachments: ❑ NONE ❑ Location Map ❑ Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure and Object Record ❑ Archaeological Record ❑ District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record ❑ Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other(List) �� DPR 523J(1/95) PW_H.doc *Required Information State of California--The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 33 of 34 *Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) I P1. Other Identifier: Santa Fe Railroad Spur P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication X unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino (P2c,P2e,and P2b or P2d. Attach Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad Guasti Date 1966 0981) T 1S, R 7W; SE'/4 of SE'/4 of See 11 ; 1208 B.M. c. Address 8812 Haven Avenue City _ Rancho Cucamonga Zip 91730 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11 mE/ mN *e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.,parcel#,directions to resource,elevation,etc.,as appropriate) APN 209-131-02 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and Its major elements. include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting,and boundaries) The railroad spur is located within the Pioneer Cucamonga Winery, which is located on a rectangular lot measuring approximately 700- by 600-feet near the northwest comer of Haven and Humboldt Avenues. The end of the spur is located on the west side of the fermentation building (D)and runs south to the distillery(C). From the distillery the spur curves to the southwest and runs to the edge of the winery property just north of Humboldt Avenue. The Santa Fe Railroad Spur is approximately 700 feet long in its current condition.The rails are in fair to good condition in the vicinity of the Fermentation Building.Asphalt has been laid in the yard between the Fermentation Building and the Distillery, and in that area only the tops of the tracks are visible. From south of the distillery, the spur has been buried under loose soil and some of the track may have been removed in this location. See continuation sheet *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) fHP11) En_ neerino structure *P4. Resources Present: ❑ Building X Structure ❑ Object ❑ Site ❑ District X Element of District ❑ Other PSa. Photo or Drawing P5b. Description of Photo: ., ", (View,date,accession#} w > View southwest 21 April_2003 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source: X Historic _ ❑ Prehistoric ❑ Both Circa 1905-1910; improved 19" ,i (Hofer 1983; 1913 Sanborn map} *P7. Owner and Address: ff Paul Hofer 11274 S.Turner y Ontario. California 91761„ -z. - *P8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,and address) ' Kirsten Erickson, URS Corp .. ` 7720 N. 16"Street Ste 100 a . -f-.�•, .�,�,,�,_f� Phoenix. Arizona 85020 {C}x P9 Date Recorded: 21 April 2003 *P10.Survey Type: (Describe) �. r - '•1 Intensive survey P11. Report Citation*: (Cite survey report and other sources,or enter"none".) Wesson.Alex, Christine Hacking, and Kirsten Erickson,2003 Haven Avenue Grade Separation Initial Study Appendix 13: DRAFT Cultural Resources Technical Report. URS Corporation, Santa Ana.. 1 *Attachments: ❑ NONE X Location Map ❑ Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet ❑ Building, Structure and Object Record f ❑ Archaeological Record X District Record ❑ Linear Feature Record ❑ Milling Station Record ❑ Rock Art Record IIII [j Artifact Record ❑ Photograph Record ❑ Other(List) zb2 #7,:.,; DPR 523A(1195) PW I.doc *Required Information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRIfrrinomial CONTINUATION SHEET Page 34 of 34 *Resource Identifier: I Recorded by: Kirsten Erickson *Date 21 April 2003 X Continuation ❑ Update Description (continued) The rails are visible at the edge of the winery property where they have been cut off north of Humboldt Avenue and the spur no longer connects to the mainline.There is a steel bumper located at the north end of the track,which stopped the train cars as they came into the winery. The 1913 Sanborn fire insurance map indicates the Atkinson, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railroad spur in its current location. A history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery indicates that improvements were made to the spur in 1944(Hofer 1983). -:iS. Fii �t y• t:aW r � Hry T •4 - 1.1 q;L 4 1 rr,j Y y .M� ��r•t '.yr 5 .'� r1 •r � 'r a v'I Railroad Spur North of Humboldt Avenue(view northeast) '~ r� ,�., � � M 'r "'�r• �,ems" F . '���• i Rom. �•, - _ _�. ^+"- .,yam .c l...s..- �• '3srata��'wa+7 ��i` ��•. f ^A �_. +�'�y r�.,{6W1_�'} yam` '- ..�f.}yl' Bumper for Railroad Cars(view west} €APR 623J (1195) PW_I.doc *Required information �r SITE LOCATION 0 C3 C M m m C� z z -� m a � C C JERSEY AV 25TH ST � B z m Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District Buildings Railroad Line Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01048 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division ' December 2003 ` r r _ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using Ink. Use the tab key to move from one tine to the next tine.) Planning Division (909)477-27W The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. it Is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the-completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic, noise, biological,drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all .required 'reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study-Part :II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1NCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: MCi M Cj-P -CC? ` v 912 t t1 Name&Address of project owner(s): no � _ T- (,s Name&Address of ro or developer project sponsor., �� p p l p �--- --oQ— (y 1:1PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTEMEnvironmentallntoForm1. Rev.6/30/03 Contact Person&rAddress: ­41- Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): S Telephone Number: hV) ) - 1 XR a Q 19 PROJECT ! ' ! DESCRIPtIOM . Information indicated by an asterisk(*)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. *1) Provide a full scale(8-112 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north,south, east, and west views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): I. ` -'vY zj? 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): *5) Gross Site Area(aclsq. ft.): *8) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed dedications): L L-YA 0 02-5 7) Describe any proposed general plan am dment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): 0. \:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Environ mental]nfo Form 1.doc Rev.6130103 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: L O'uc n' fig eL AaULs+?)'S" Irpl Moog 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/orhydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): C l LA, r ,� dam. Ly LA c� 10 A-n ; n yyyo 3c, r l o --he, 4krjaacj Vs t " f� G C�3 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): 4+N r C t`Zg c� CA-Lxctl ` 7-Lze I:IPLANNINGIFINALWORMSZOUNTEMEnvironmendalInto Form i.doc Rev.6130/03 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: a 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: I10 1 t 1 -0roG r u.+C¢� UAAU C , S La r 4 , ILIL +Y u,Y-e 13) Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural,historical,orscenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage,setback, rear yard,etc.): 1 C\ - , c CZl. 1 VJ 1� i �.�.1 O 14) Will the proposed oject change the pattern,scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? I:IFLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTER1EnvironmentallnfoForml.doo Rev.6/30103 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: v tC� � LL?yILJ 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: 'l - - 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gallday) Peak use(gallDay} b. Commercial/ind. (gaUdaylac) In Peak use(gakminlac) 19) Indicate proposed method ofsewage disposal. l� ❑ septic Tank II ❑ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests=(If discharge to a sanitary se�va�ge system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (see Attachment A forusage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gaUday) b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/daylac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: �n - - Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: �` L Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTERlEnvironmentaflnfoFonnt.doc Rev.6/30/03 21) Anticipated range of sale prices andlor rents: Sale Pfice(s) $ 10 to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ G 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project. Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B. a. Elementary: MCA b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL,AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial,or institutional uses by type: 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift. Time of Maximum Shift: 1:1PLANN I NGIFINALIFOR MS1COl1 NTER1EnvironmentallnfoForm 1.doc Rev.6/30/03 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City,• *31) For commercial and industrial uses only,indicate the source, type,and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(816)572-6283): V l Q ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? if so,please indicate their response. 33) In the known history of this property,has there been any use,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCBs;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels,ails,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use,storage,and/or discharge on the property,as well as the dates of use,it known. N)o E:IPLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERIEnvironmentallnfoForml,doc Rev.6130/03 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/ortoxicmaterials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses,along with the storage and shipment areas,shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. �S 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of myknowledge and belief. 1 further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: ID Si nature. Title: 1APLANNINGIFINAL.FORMS\COUNTERIEnvironmentalinfoFonnl.doc Rev.6130/03 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART 11 BACKGROUND 1. Project Fite: DRC2003-01048 2. Related Files: 3. Description of Project: A request to designate the Pioneer Winery, located at 8812 Haven Avenue as a Historic Point of Interest in order to allow demolition of all buildings and structures on the property. -APN: 0209-131-02. 4. Project Sponsors Name and Address: Pioneer, LLC- Paul B. Hofer III 11248 South Turner Avenue Ontario, CA 91761 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park, Subarea 6, and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is 9.65 acres, and contains several buildings formerly used for crushing grapes, bulk wine storage, bottling, and distilling. The structures were constructed beginning in the early 20th century until the 1940s. Residential development exists directly west of the site. North of the project site is zoned Low Density Residential as well as Industrial Park, while south of the project site is zoned Industrial Park as well as General industrial. To the east is also Industrial Park. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Lori Shriver, Historic Preservation Planning Aide (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PM,o— Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G — Urban Emissions Model .A5V Initial Study for: PIONEER WINERY - DRC2003-01048 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or"Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( )Aesthetics ( ) Agricultural Resources ()Air Quality ( ) Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources () Geology/Soils ( ) Hazards & Hazardous {} Hydrology/Water Quality ( ) Land Use/Planning Materials () Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Population/Housing { ) Mineral Resources ( } Noise ( )Transportation/Traffic { ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Utilities/Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ` (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but'at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: Date: December 2, 2003 Reviewed By: _ � � /y Date: December 2 2003 Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page 3 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No € act lncoM2rated Impact Irmad EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the projecf: a} Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? ( } ( ) { ) {✓} b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) (} ( ) (✓) not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or (} ( } ( ) {✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( } ( ) ( ) (✓) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit 111-15. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at Haven Avenue and Humboldt Street and is characterized by Industrial Park development to the immediate north, south, and east. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. d) No additional lighting is proposed for this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) (} ( ) (✓} Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( } { ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? c} Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( } ( ) (✓} which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is located at Haven Avenue and Humboldt Street and is characterized by Industrial Park development to the immediate north, south, and east. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farms are located in the southern and eastern Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY page 4 P Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wrih Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact InCOrOorated ImDarl lm2acl portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is located at Haven Avenue and Humboldt Street and is characterized by Industrial Park development to the immediate north, south, and east. There is no activity in the vicinity of the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( } ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) () (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) () ( ) (✓) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( } () ( ) (✓} number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and y construction activities; however, the scope of the project is such that development of the parking lot for the proposed office will not create a significant impact in the immediate area and therefore no mitigation measures are necessary. Rev. 7/22/03 Iq Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048-- PIONEER WINERY Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact IncoMpratotJ Irmact E act c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located more than 0.70 miles from the nearest sensitive receptor. Therefore, no adverse impacts are,anticipated. e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Rev. 7/22/03 �" Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page g Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially Wi,h Than Significant Mitigation Significant No [ act IncorDorated Impact IrTact f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) () () (✓} Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential and industrial uses. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments and annual disking for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare. or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the (} (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) V) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( } resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) There are several winery buildings existing onsite near the corner of Haven Avenue and ` :..., Humboldt Street. The structures are located at 8812 Haven Avenue. The buildings at 8812 Haven Avenue are currently designated as a "Potential Local Landmark." In June 2003, a Cultural Resources Technical Report was prepared as a Rev. 7/22/03 115-9 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048 — PIONEER WINERY Page 7 Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact McorDorated IMOaCt I act supplement to the Haven Avenue Grade Separation at SCRRA Railroad Tracks, which are directly south of the subject site. The report was prepared by Alex Wesson, Christine Hacking, and Kirsten Erickson of URS. Although the report finds "The Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District appears to be eligible for listing in the FRHR under Criteria A." and ..also appears to be eligible under Criteria B and C," reports from Langston &Associates Structural Consultants, and Thirtieth Street Architects Inc., indicate the restoration of the buildings is not economically and structurally feasible. (Draft Initial Study, URS p. 4-5) The following mitigation measures are required: 1. The property owner will place a plaque at the project site describing the historical importance of the Pioneer Winery. 2. The property owner will conduct two oral histories for individuals that were connected with the operation or history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery will be conducted. A maximum of $2,500 per interview will be deposited with the City Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolition permit. 3. The developer building any new development on this property will include an interpretive art and architectural component. This component shall be processed.as part of the Development Review Application. 4. Prior to issuance of demolition permits the property owner will complete Historical Architectural Building Survey (HABS) Level I documentation or a similar level of documentation for each of the six contributing buildings within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District. An experienced HABS level photographer will use large-format cameras to produce perspective corrected, black-and-white photographs of overall views and details of important exterior and interior features of each structure. The photographs record textures, details, and spatial relationships not easily conveyed by drawings or written word. Measured drawings shall be completed for each building. An archival-quality deliverable including written reports, black and white large-format photographic prints, and measured drawings, would be completed. The original documents and one single sided reproducible copy shall be deposited with the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center. b) There are no known archeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). The Project area is considered sensitive for historic archaeological resources, and the potential exists for previously unknown cultural resources to be found during construction at any location. Potentially significant impacts to archaeological resources will be mitigated to a less than significant level through the implementation of the following general mitigation measures: 5. A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving construction activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis. The City will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The archaeological monitor will conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If Rev. 7/22/03lp 0 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048-- PIONEER WINERY Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentlaily with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Invacl previously unknown subsurface cultural materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be implemented. The archaeological monitor will have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 6. Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management)shall be informed of the cultural resource values involved and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources (as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect artifacts, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite archaeological monitor in the event that cultural remains are discovered during the course of construction. The archaeological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activities. The City will be responsible for notifying the archaeological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 7. In the event archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be stopped immediately, and a qualified archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures set forth at CEQA Section 15064.5, shall evaluate the discovery. If the find is evaluated as significant under CEQA, further mitigation measures will be developed in concert with the City. 8. If human skeletal remains are found at the project site during earth moving activities such as grading or trenching, work shall be suspended and the San Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be notified. Standard guidelines set by California law provides for the treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (California Public Resources Code, Sections 5097.98 et seq.; Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 and others). Procedures to be employed in the treatment of human remains are found in, "A Professional Guide for the Preservation and Protection of Native American Human Remains and Associated Grave Goods," published by the California Native American Heritage Commission. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site. . Potentially significant impacts to paleontological resources will be mitigated to a less than significant level through the implementation of the following general mitigation measures: 9. A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving construction activity. .:a The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis, as deemed appropriate by a qualified paleontologist. The City will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if Rev. 7/22/03 14� Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page 9 Less Than Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Julpact incorporated Iffpad Irwact any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The paleontological monitor will conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be implemented. The paleontological monitor will have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 10. Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the paleontological resources and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated paleontological resources (as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite paleontological monitor in the event that fossils or mineralized bones are discovered during the course of construction. The paleontological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activities. The City will be responsible for notifying the paleontological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 11. In the event paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be suspended in the immediate vicinity of the finds, and a qualified paleontological specialist shall evaluate the potential significance of the resource. During the evaluation period, work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long as the paleontologist has determined that there is no potential to impact other resources. d) The proposed project is in an area that 'has already been disturbed by surrounding development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments and annual disking for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( } ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( } ( ) ( } (✓) Rev. 7/22/03 (Va Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inc vrporated Impact l act iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) (} (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () ( ) (✓} or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) () ( ) (✓) 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use (} () { ) (✓} of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: ixe a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 2.5 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mr, 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M,N 7.5 earthquakes is 7 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to MM,8.2 earthquakes, is 9 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant for any future development. b} The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project is minor in nature and will not result in significant impacts or significant erosion. c} The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types onsite consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand, 30 to 50 percent slopes according to General Plan FOR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types onsite consist of Tujunga Loamy Sand, 30 to 50 percent slopes according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are characterized by slight erosion hazards, and low to very low runoff potential_ No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev. 7/22/03 9&3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant mitigation Significant No I act Incorporated Inipact Invacl e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the { ) ( ) (} {✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) (} { ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or { } ( ) () (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) () { ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) { } ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓} loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Rev. 7/22/03 � Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No I act Incorporated JffVact IrTacl Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials including asbestos will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within 0.70 miles of the nearest existing school. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. Project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () ( ) ( } (✓) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Rev. 7/22/03 Jq&5- Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact IncorDorated Irmact I act d) Substantially after the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed {} (} () {✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () ( ) {) (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as { ) { ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) { ) () (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami, or mudflow? {) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. b) According to CCWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The project will cause minimal changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the reduction of buildings on the site; however, the project will not after the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project will cause minimal changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the reduction of buildings on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be Rev. 7/22/03 /TW Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated 1 I-rnpact lmoact conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause minimal changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the reduction of buildings on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period would result in minimal increases in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in minimal surface water quality impacts. The site is greater than 1 acre; therefore; is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. No impacts are anticipated. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project. a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning - ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Rev. 7/22/03 IU Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY page 1 Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant N Impact Incorporated I act .1 c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () ( ) () (✓} or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at Haven Avenue and Humboldt Street and is characterized by Industrial Park development to the immediate north, south, and east. This project contains no construction of new buildings. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Industrial Park. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan PEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( } ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table 1V-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓} excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) ✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Rev. 7/22/03 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga rN.. DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No InVact Inco crated Impact Irmart e) For a project located within an airport land use plan-or, {} { } { ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () {) { ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. In addition, the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards, however the level of construction required for the proposed project is limited to minor site improvement and will not result in significant impacts to neighboring properties. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) See a) response above. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 21/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project.- a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either { ) ( ) ( } (✓) directly(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) { ) ( ) {✓} necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) { } ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 7/22/03 140 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polentially with Than Signiffcant Mitigation Significant No ImDact i Incorporated Irma IrMact b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) (} (} (✓) b) Police protection? (} ( } ( ) (✓) c) Schools? d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) { ) (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at Haven Avenue and Humboldt Street and is characterized by Industrial Park development to the immediate north, south, and east, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will not be required to pay school fees as prescribed by State law because there will be no increase in the existing building area and no impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan Rev. 7/22/03 /i� Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page 18 H Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant fdo I act Incorporated I act I act FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the project. a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( � () (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1 mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANS PORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project. a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in ( ) ( � ( ) (✓) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of = ) ( ) ( ) (✓? service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) ✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? � ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Rev. 7/22/03 A 1l Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY page 19 Less Than signiricant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polentiaify With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact tncorporateo Impact irnpacl g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () {) () {✓) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments., a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards, as applicable. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project will generate no additional trips as no construction will be occurring. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site, as applicable. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project does not require parking and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project is non-construction in nature and therefore will not impact transportation. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project. a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( } { ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) { ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) { ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( } ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Rev. 7/22103 A r0 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048-- PIONEER WINERY Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than significant Mitigation Significant No IrTacl Inco prated I act I act e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () ( ) () (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 4- Rev. 7/22/03 1" 7J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No _Impact incorporated impact Irnow 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () { ) {) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) The proposed demolition of existing structures would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. Rev. 7/22/03 #�Av Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2003-01048— PIONEER WINERY Page 22 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (✓) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (✓) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (✓) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) -w.r. Rev. 7/22/03 Den 22 03 03: 35p Hofer Ranch 9093904597 p. 2 Initial Study far City of Rancho Cu-,'amanga 0age23 ORC2003-01045 rt PIONEER WINERY _— APPLICANT CERTIMCATION I Certify that I am the applicant for the proJvct described in this Initial Study. I acknovredge t-a' read this Initial Study MCI the proposed mitigation measures. Further. I have revised tha proj,-^i plane or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigaWn measures to avoid the effe:ts ar r,i elate the etfects to a point where cf 0 signifiCanWylronmentalle1jects would occur. Applicant's Signal Print Name and Title: --- i:\planningliinahpirvcornmlarn+doc\dro2d03.OIW ts.rev.d% Rev.7122JO3 City of Rancho Cucamonga "NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DRC2003-01048 Public Review Period Closes: January 28, 2004 Project Name: Project Applicant: Pioneer, LLC—Paul Hofer [I] Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 8812 Haven Avenue-APN: 0209-131-02 Project Description: A request to designate the Pioneer Winery as a Historic Point of Interest in order to allow demolition of all buildings and structures on the property. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. ® The initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive(909)477-2750 or Fax(909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Janua 28 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By �J RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DRC2003-01048, DESIGNATING THE CUCAMONGA PIONEER WINERY A HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, LOCATED AT 8812 HAVEN AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-131-02. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for a Historic Point of Interest as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Point of Interest is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 28,2004,the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: _ 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 9.65 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at 8812 Haven Avenue. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January28, 2004, including written and oral staff reports,togetherwith public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed Point of Interest is particularly representative of an historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. Facts: The winery represents the agricultural period of the Cucamonga region, and relates to the livelihood of many residents. Finding 2: The proposed Point of Interest was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Facts: The winery was owned at one time by Garrett and Company, one of Cucamonga's prominent wineries. The cooperative involved several significant families within the Cucamonga region, including the Thomases, DeBerards, Belchers, Millikens, and Hofers. Finding 3: The proposed Point of Interest is connected with a business or use,which was once common but is now rare. . � ff HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 2 Facts: Wineries were once common within the Cucamonga area, but were not necessary, as demand for sweet wines declined and the region began to be subdivided by developers. Facts: The cooperative was the first in Cucamonga that independently owned its own winery, and was well known in the region for this accomplishment. 4. Tii Commission hereby finds that the project has b _rev ewed and considered in compliance with th GalifD nia Environmental Quality Acgt o 970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The Co ission ji s..that-th s iH storic Point of Interest Designation is exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State_G-EQA—Guidelines Sec Eo t 1-5331 a Class 3i exemption (historical resource restoratiaehabi itation). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1.of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Historic Point of Interest" designation is merely recognition for historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark designations, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of January 2004, of Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-01048 contingent upon completion of the following mitigation measures: Environmental Mitigation Cultural Resources 1) The property owner will place a plaque at the project site describing the historical importance of the Pioneer Winery. 2) The property owner will conduct two oral histories for individuals that were connected with the operation or history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery. A maximum of $2,500 per interview will be deposited with the City Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolition permit. 3) The developer building any new development on this property will include an interpretive art and architectural component. This component shall be processed as part of the Development Review Application. 4) Prior tb issuance of demolition permits the property owner will complete a HistoricNArchitectural Building Survey (NABS) Level I documentation or a similar leve),�f documentation for each of the six contributing buildings within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District. An experienced HABS level photographer will use large-format cameras to produce perspective ' corrected, black\and-white photographs of overall views and details of important exterior and interior features of each structure. The photographs 1/ zL record textures, deta)Js, and spatial relationships not easily conveyed by ., � drawings or written wordeasured drawings shall be completed for each building. An arch ival-quali .deliverable including written reports, black and white large-format photographic prints, and measured drawings, would be completed. The original documents,and one single sided reproducible copy shall be deposited with the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center. iq 7� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048--CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 2 Facts: Wineries were once common within the Cucamonga area, but were not necessary, as demand for sweet wines declined and the region began to be subdivided by developers. Factls: The cooperative was the first in Cucamonga that independently owned, its own winery, and was well known in the region for this accomplishment. y s and the ramulgated thereunder. The Commission finds that this HistoriG Point Gf Interest Designation is exempt under- CEQA, pur-sua t to State CEQA Guidelines S 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)of 1970, as amended,and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and,further,this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved,all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval. C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Historic Preservation Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Historic Preservation Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1. of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Historic Point of Interest" designation is merely recognition for HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 2 Factls: Wineries were once common within the Cucamonga area, but were not necessary, as demand for sweet wines declined and the region began to be subdivided by developers. Factls: The cooperative was the first in Cucamonga that independently owned its own winery, and was well known in the region for this accomplishment. A This Gemmiss ion hereby finds that the p eGthasbeenreviewed and Gansider ...r-s� Guidelines promulgated thereunder-. The commissiGn fonds that this HisteriG Point e ex 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)of 1970, as amended,and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and,further.,this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved,all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval. C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Historic Preservation Commission finds as follows: in considering the record as a whole,the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Historic Preservation Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1. of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Historic Point of Interest" designation is merely recognition for Z� 7/ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048--CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 3 historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark designations, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of January 2004, of Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-01048 contingent upon completion of the following mitigation measures: Environmental Mitigation Cultural Resources 1) The property owner will place a plaque at the project site describing the historical importance of the Pioneer Winery. 2) The property owner will conduct two oral histories for individuals that were connected with the operation or history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery. A maximum of$2,500 per interview will be deposited with the City Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolition permit. 3) The developer building any new development on this property will include an interpretive art and architectural component. This component shall be processed as part of the Development Review Application. 4) Prior to issuance of demolition permits the property ownerwill complete Historical Architectural Building Survey (HABS) Level 4— 1111 documentation or a similar level of documentation for each of the six contributing buildings within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District. An experienced HABS level photographer will use large-format cameras to produce perspective corrected, black-and-white photographs of overall views and details of important exterior and interior features of each structure. The photographs record textures, details, and spatial relationships not easily conveyed by drawings or written word. Measured drawings shall ...pleted for earh buail�'c� An archival-quality deliverable including written reports, black and white large-format photographic prints would be completed. The original documents and one single sided reproducible copy shall be deposited with the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center. 5) A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving construction activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis. The GiltjF developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The archaeological monitorwill conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface cultural materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be implemented. The archaeological monitor will HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 4 have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 6) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the cultural resource values involved and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources (as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect artifacts, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite archaeological monitor in the event that cultural remains are discovered during the course of construction. The archaeological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activities. The -ACity developer will be responsible for notifying the archaeological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 7) In the event archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be stopped immediately and a qualified archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures set forth at CEQA Section 15064.5,shall evaluate the discovery. If the find is evaluated as significant under CEQA, further mitigation measures will be developed in concert with the City. 8) If human skeletal remains are found at the project site during earth moving activities such as grading or trenching, work shall be suspended and the San Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be notified. Standard guidelines set by California law provides for the treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (California Public Resources Code, Sections 5097.98 et seq.; Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 and others). Procedures to be employed in the treatment of human remains are found in,"A Professional Guide forthe Preservation and Protection of Native American Human Remains and Associated Grave Goods,"published by the California Native American Heritage Commission. 9) A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving construction activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis, as deemed appropriate by a qualified paleontologist. The -44ty developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The paleontological monitorwill conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials are uncovered,construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below C� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048--CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 5 will be implemented. The paleontological monitor will have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 10) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities(including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the paleontological resources and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated paleontological resources(as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite paleontological monitor in the event that fossils or mineralized bones are discovered during the course of construction. The paleontological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction -----� activities. The -City developer will be responsible for notifying the paleontological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 11) In the event paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be suspended in the immediate vicinity of the finds,and a qualified paleontological specialist shall evaluate the potential significance of the resource. During the evaluation period, work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long as the paleontologist has determined that there is no potential to impact other resources. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary R—a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 2 Factls: Wineries were once common within the Cucamonga area, but were not necessary, as demand for sweet wines declined and the region began to be subdivided by developers. Facts: The cooperative was the first in Cucamonga that independently owned its own winery, and was well known in the region for this accomplishment. 4. This Gemmiss-en hereby finds that the prejeGt has been reviiewe���� in e;ernplianGe with the Galifernia Envir-m-nmental Quality Act of 197-0, as amended, and the Guidelines pr-ornulgated thereunder. The Gernmission funds that this Hister-iG Point o interest Designation is exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State GEQA Guidelines SeGtlell 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) of 1970, as amended,and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and,further,this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval. C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Historic Preservation Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Historic Preservation Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24.080, Section C. 1. of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: The "Historic Point of Interest"designation is merely recognition for ,4 I-If i •�, r ,. � r �-r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 3 historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark designations, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of January 2004, of Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-01048 contingent upon completion of the following mitigation measures: Environmental Mitigation Cultural Resources 1) The property ownerwill place a plaque at the project site describing the historical importance of the Pioneer Winery. 2) The property owner will conduct two oral histories for individuals that were connected with the operation or history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery. A maximum of$2,500 per interview will be deposited with the City Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolition permit. 3) The developer building any new development on this property will include an interpretive art and architectural component. This component shall be processed as part of the Development Review Application. 4) Prior to issuance of demolition permits the property ownerwill complete Historical Architectural Building Survey (HABS) Level 4-111 documentation or a similar level of documentation for each of the six contributing buildings within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District. An experienced HABS level photographer will use large-format cameras to produce perspective corrected, black-and-white photographs of overall views and details of important exterior and interior features of each structure. The photographs record textures, details, and spatial relationships not easily conveyed by drawings or written word. Mrl^.,....red .Jr.....:..gs shall be rao mpleted far-eaGh buildino__ An archival-quality deliverable including written reports, black and white large-format photographic prints would be completed. The original documents and one single sided reproducible copy shall be deposited with the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center. 5) A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving construction activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis. The—GityF developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The archaeological monitorwill conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface cultural materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be implemented. The archaeological monitor will 10 �-... ,, �.., �� ,a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 4 have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 6) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the cultural resource values involved and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources (as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect artifacts, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite archaeological monitor in the event that cultural remains are discovered during the course of construction. The archaeological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction ~-' activities. The --Gity developer will be responsible for notifying the archaeological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 7) In the event archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be stopped immediately and a qualified archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures setforth at CEQA Section 15064.5, shall evaluate the discovery. If the find is evaluated as significant under CEQA, further mitigation measures will be developed in concert with the City. 8) If human skeletal remains are found at the project site during earth moving activities such as grading or trenching, work shall be suspended and the San Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be notified. Standard guidelines set by California law provides for the treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (California Public Resources Code, Sections 5097.98 et seq.; Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 and others). Procedures to be employed in the treatment of human remains are found in,"A Professional Guide forthe Preservation and Protection of Native American Human Remains and Associated Grave Goods,"published by the California Native American Heritage Commission. 9) A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving construction activity.The monitoring will be on an intermittent,spot-check basis, as deemed appropriate by a qualified paleontologist. The -Qti} .� developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The paleontological monitorwill conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials are uncovered,construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below 4' A7/ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 5 will be implemented. The paleontological monitor will have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 10) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities(including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the paleontological resources and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated paleontological resources(as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite paleontological monitor in the event that fossils or mineralized bones are discovered during the course of construction. The paleontological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction --- activities. The -Gity developer will be responsible for notifying the paleontological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 11) In the event paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be suspended in the immediate vicinity of the finds,and a qualified paleontological specialist shall evaluate the potential significance'of the resource. During the evaluation period,work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long as the paleontologist has determined that there is no potential to impact other resources. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 -f Page 3 5) A professional archaeologist will monitor eart�i moving construction activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis. The City will be responsible for providing th5�,archaeofogical monitor with the current construction schedule on angular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The archaeological moni or will conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew eduation) as outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface cu)tural materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described,below will be implemented. The archaeological monitor will have the aut�orfty to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 6) Prior to the beginning of!a -m--oving construction activities (including initial grading of vegetati� removal), all construction personnel (including management)sh il,be informed of the cultural resource values involved and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personn"hall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources(as outlined below). They shall be cautioned �,- not to collect artifacts, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite archaeological monitor in the event that cultural remains are discovered during the course of construction. The archaeological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activities. The City will be responsible for notifying the archaeological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 7) In the event archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project,work shall be stopped immediately,and a qualified archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures set forth at CEQA Section 15064.5, shall evaluate the discovery. If the find is evaluated as significant under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), further mitigation measures will be developed in concert with the City. 8) If human skeletal remains are found at the project site during earth moving activities such as grading or trenching,work shall be suspended and the San Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be notified. Standard guidelines set by California law provides for the treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (California Public Resources Code, Sections 5097.98 et seq.; Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 and others). Procedures to be employed in the treatment of human remains are found in, "A Professional Guide for the Preservation and Protection of Native American Human Remains and Associated Grave Goods," published by the California Native American Heritage Commission. 9) A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving construction activity.The monitoring will be op,-an intermittent, spot-check basis, as deemed } appropriate by a qu ified paleontologist. The City will be responsible for � -� providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscf�eduled ground disturbing activity is required. The paleontological rr nitor will conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 4 education) as outlined bel1w If previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials,pre uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halte �fid the emergency discovery procedures described below will be im cemented. The paleontological monitor will have the authority)-sop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 10) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all�- construction personnel (including management)shall be informed5We paleontological resources and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed 5prijbedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated paleontological res Ir°ces(as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, arld asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite e1 paleontologic monitor in the event that fossils or mineralized bones are discovered during the course of construction. The paleontological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction activities. The City Will be responsible for notifying the paleontological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 11) In the event paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be suspended in the immediate vicinity of the finds,and a qualified paleontological specialist shall evaluate the potential significance of the resource. During the evaluation period, work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long as the paleontologist has determined that there is no potential to impact other resources. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 28th day of January 2004, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: /�Q� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 3 historical purposes and is not subject to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to landmark designations, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of January 2004, of Historic Point of Interest DRC2003-01048 contingent upon completion of the following mitigation measures: Environmental Mitigation Cultural Resources 1} The property ownerwill place a plaque at the project site describing the historical importance of the Pioneer Winery. 2) The property owner will conduct two oral histories for individuals that were connected with the operation or history of the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery. A maximum of$2,500 per interview will be deposited with the City Planning Division prior to issuance of a demolition permit. 3) The developer building any new development on this property will include an interpretive art and architectural component. This component shall be processed as part of the Development Review Application. 4) Prior to issuance of demolition permits the property ownerwill complete Historical Architectural Building Survey (NABS) Level f----III documentation or a similar level of documentation for each of the six contributing buildings within the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery District. An experienced HABS level photographer will use large-format cameras to produce perspective corrected, black-and-white photographs of overall views and details of important exterior and interior features of each structure. The photographs record textures, details, and spatial relationships not easily conveyed by drawings or written word. building. An archival-quality deliverable including written reports, black and white large-format photographic prints would be completed. The original documents and one single sided reproducible copy shall be deposited with the Rancho Cucamonga Archives Center. 5) A professional archaeologist will monitor earth moving construction activity. The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis. I00, The— it developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The archaeological monitor will conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training(crew education) as outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface cultural materials are uncovered, construction work in the immediate vicinity will be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below will be implemented. The archaeological monitor will ge HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 4 have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 6) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities (including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the cultural resource values involved and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated cultural resources (as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect artifacts, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite archaeological monitor in the event that cultural remains are discovered during the course of construction. The archaeological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction - -� activities. The 44ty developer will be responsible for notifying the archaeological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 7) In the event archaeological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be stopped immediately and a qualified archaeologist, pursuant to the procedures set forth at CEQA Section 15064.5,shall evaluate the discovery. If the find is evaluated as significant under CEQA, further mitigation measures will be developed in concert with the City. 8) If human skeletal remains are found at the project site during earth moving activities such as grading or trenching, work shall be suspended and the San Bernardino County Coroner's Office shall be notified. Standard guidelines set by California law provides for the treatment of skeletal material of Native American origin (California Public Resources Code, Sections 5097.98 et seq.; Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5 and others). Procedures to be employed in the treatment of human remains are found in,"A Professional Guide forthe Preservation and Protection of Native American Human Remains and Associated Grave Goods,"published by the California Native American Heritage Commission. 9) A paleontological monitor will observe earth moving construction activity.The monitoring will be on an intermittent, spot-check basis,as deemed appropriate by a qualified paleontologist. The —C#y developer will be responsible for providing the archaeological monitor with the current construction schedule on a regular basis, and for notifying the archaeological monitor if any unscheduled ground disturbing activity is required. The paleontological monitorwili conduct on-site cultural resources sensitivity training (crew education) as outlined below. If previously unknown subsurface paleontological materials are uncovered,construction work in the immediate vicinitywill be halted and the emergency discovery procedures described below HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-02 DRC2003-01048-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 28, 2004 Page 5 will be implemented. The paleontological monitor will have the authority to stop and/or redirect construction in the event of an unanticipated discovery. 10) Prior to the beginning of earth moving construction activities(including initial grading of vegetation removal), all construction personnel (including management) shall be informed of the paleontological resources and of the regulatory protections afforded those resources. The construction personnel shall also be informed of procedures relating to the discovery of unanticipated paleontological resources(as outlined below). They shall be cautioned not to collect fossils, and asked to inform a construction supervisor and the onsite paleontological monitor in the event that fossils or mineralized bones are discovered during the course of construction. The paleontological monitor shall administer supplemental briefings to all new construction personnel, prior to their commencement of earth moving construction ---� activities. The-G+ty developer will be responsible for notifying the paleontological monitor when new construction personnel are scheduled to work on the project. 11) In the event paleontological resources are unearthed during excavation activities associated with the Project, work shall be suspended in the immediate vicinity of the finds,and a qualified paleontological specialist shall evaluate the potential significance-of the resource. During the evaluation period,work can be redirected to nearby locations, as long as the paleontologist has determined that there is no potential to impact other resources. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2004. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary /41 C�'/, City of Rancho Cucamonga ;71 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Historic Point Of interest Designation DRC2003-01048 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of,approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary.This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A flee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants`fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency . Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 00S MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2003-01048—CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. £. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures.The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued.The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring.The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. y • CO) LL "" N • O : � = N © C- � O O 0 h ..I O- c) (D n. cn © o � o 0 - o Z EL � � Q 5 m � a�i G Q oo © � U (t U U v o W ❑ m m m '� U z A.A.. r r 0 ~ U U U U Z 0 .0 CD o o n ° 70o ID v CD e � y t5 z CD _ ° U - �. >r U O m .0 3 .n c U cn O :] � _ I m 01 vi � m O u� c Q 0 O 4) L U cn a) O (D (D CD � a) i- - 0 -0 CD 0 (D "'FZ a) 41"O U m U ` X � "L U a7 O � i fB D . cu i O O - •� 7 O Ca O C Q) O to a1 cTS -0 .0 [U CD CL L T0 (D P: Q U O '� a� C1. a) co O O a� 0 +O i CO •� X a L (D i CD o o � � � `n = .� m 00 — C a o m ° 0 o a`) o o m�� � ] c� U N o E C (D CO � �� ¢ = •L Es c' � -=o y •= °L°' �^ o m L.) 'a U . O C m � a) ° O U C O w o O O N M 0 � a) -o p L. = o O c O � a) -0 m co - cu Q m a > >c ca >, U -- ° 3 U E � v o m'� aa) •02 co E cc � L gym $ � � CIS o a) � M C: oQ CL Q i w a aG 0Uxx v c ED- E ai Z �- a, o -- -0 � � � � c E-' '°M .� � � as w � � a' ¢ y � � O G3 .� y �, �. � c ¢ 3 °a'= ~ om c � N c -c o � o�Q. �~ � as u3 � � 0 0 - u' U - ¢ m3 .Crc3C: -acgy � o LL ID N DC o m o o m m C � � C a0i 3 = w M. C i m ca m �U a rn `o nA o ° p _oL o rcc QQO 8 D C °o m � x aci c ° o o O �- -c C a m O (g m CD p « c .i p O CUC G U � � � h- .� c U � . - aU o 0 0 � ¢ ro � oin to 0 3 n 0 cnoC . r 0 p a� c c 0 0 O � w p o .? o o 5 C .- [i � r • Q �] m N O O m ' U U c� c m � vi ro ro c vi o "p N co � -O - - as c W .Y C w"C.. > O .0 M Q) 2 -n U ,C? •0 CD o CISO O O O = p C ZZ O P=CD >v N M O .-.O O 0_ W p` p � p O w � O a L a) U oar 3 0 cn c E C (>D a EC 'U `.Qc U C C;)' � Cp o o ala ° ca s � ? U : aO co c co E M .a W OcjC (DCD a) Coc CD -0 � 0 o ° � UO > m — C .c o U m U .� — ooc � Oo CO ma 0CU Eo � co (r w p � Q -a .0 a) 0 : COcn L 3 m • QUC°93 _�cWC'... cro �E — �=p ;aamcn) .�. r- -�O . , L . �LLaCo° aw�.cS�.=C •C ~ O O a •�- L.p-v �aC),�y a°CCca)..cOC ° ° 0U ° c E > � o c E a 'coo � ~ c _ OQQ U — O O O W "O co O . U E CU a OO U U LQ ° � a)3: 0 C U O2y O U C O ° Nco I ca y C• W O -0 Cj � cx � > c UW —o .a � , oons O 0 Q 00 _ w ° mEao oL v o � ' omco c ao d . c ° � oQ Lc v N '' c " � ° o Nco - " Mo W U (Z ( U OR1 O5 � y ` U E " c CO O ro C) a C °p "O a) OC C Cp - O 1 OLyC c E -:E .0 a t co a) - C a) 0 C. 5 wU O 0 0 E .o O -0 E c ro i Q Q ° c - ocar a na sC F ❑. a (D -a o U Q cCW V) C) C L — 7 O 0 0 Q L O n- _ a C _ Ua)' ZQ ] : LQ aOp O W ( � O C— D � a C -0 (0 -0 O C Q . C (D C W '� � (0 _ Q UU (D a5 O oo � Em � � W U o EQUw c . o o� o acaauC: m0ow 3aN U 0 0 Ea, u�� — � ` O S a Q � (DQ CD E Q W _M co a U TO rtV 0 qL cu co .0 O U U 0 �� cy CD Q. r r j D L 0 U L U to U N 3 (D O ` O ,7 O C Q N O U c a r O U U CO Cr3 m � m m v � n m o o ro c o eQ o aY°i > �) � � _ N c v or ` > r O p)fA :'_" N .L ° •U U .� cC m m F- Z '� {� '• .G c c � p CD `- 0 0 - oco _a 'c o oZ o o'� d - . O cn : o — c O O O U Q C O ca »r uJ 5 N c� [u Q C ro .O N Q1 O .0 cu co N Q o a- 0 O ¢ CD p T7 CL N .e m O. �, O O .° 'a m M C -O � . N � � - CD :a '" � � WZU m wca a) a) •UmENoa) 3 � sCdc CD rn o U E �:m m � -roa 0 .0 ro .� N N� ° cU m c' a0 � C ct5 �� 3Y O -0 CD � �°, M2 O ? 0 C cn C E U R O co o .- 0 N - -a 0 O U j O � C p —_ "C7 U 0 ,5 w (6 Q� O N = _O �_y + O N fd d O U -0 v d U ' y 'Cn fI7 O d 'D O" � co O N a _ �- 0 N C 0 CD c O C m t co O C O i l 0 ID cc its tz E ro 'c m ` N LU C Zia S co � � d .� •3 cm— rp '� c� U N ro m � mti [i C N us o O 0 � - ' O C a) O vOi . U Q y ,�'Q N ' O C .� a5 o O O p U U O "O 0 — N = cum p } � vy o Er E ° L a c CM m � L C v, � o m � O o '� (1) C cn N '3 ca _ d ro N `n `as L C L cn E 'c �= O C o �' o cU m a Cl c 0 - a � � ro N E �� U N ro � ro o = ,.o �j o � � � � .U � a -c �, am � i, a) M ro O i O N Q) _� N .T N y �- N O O m L1 O _ 'j U a p i C d 5 � c� 'd v �� i ,O N C].r m N d Y 'C ,� CSf a. Q1 L U al `• "". N o) O E N E 0 o N C (4 O C co—O Qd7 E O d O E N C6:� '� coU O O T cfl it 'S fiS W 0 7 O co 7 Y t U '� C O O E Q) _O N U �w TS .0 to O U ' C 7 O Co — M ti O N d d' N ca ( c ¢ 0 = d O i� O O a� a� '� N >, O C ■ x C� O d C C N pj.0 a E U C O a) C C aCi a Z c O O N o � U E sa O O CO 0) '� T m N Ch LQ 76 coO U O � N '_ O Cd7 C OC Q CDQ � .9 U c C ti O E co ro 7 en o O U CO m O Y - C O C co � Wa� :� m C " aaim0 .5)C'D -) i� O � roE afro Nro 'aN00 = v a) E o a 3 mU E E = Ts tocn oLOr a_ oC7 ¢ ¢ o .� o CCa a2 o c. � aE) •n - 0 7 � m w o Co "o L N a nD i ID C) �ry o ❑ C O [� U 1 CV C; rt LO fp1 n1 ■ ❑ 0 C. C. Q � C O :3 O C • O O CM i v w N 7+ co -ge EL 0 al I— U cC ' 0 t C (D Q U L *0cis N O c O O 1 d, k Q m U ❑ O 0 o 0 • c n v, o C • rr y U p L- U QO a cm U - = E C U c O cn := �O ro Or-- 4) O O � O N? OG r O O0 Uc[f ❑ La OoF � � � o � � � o ►- - CLa) r � - � o EC G y 3o cDL -cn ON ¢ � O i � O D or-)a) O � C O rC « "C N ] a) .l CD O L .Q7 . COSC CD `Ocu - O 5' oa o - cO o (DNcD N N � w 0 -0 : s0 2O � a)� H7G . V ) O {U ca CO p O L O a . O cu O O N a)w DCOC O _ N mO-Z Z Oo C a) 10 J- o r- Q - Ocis C j G7 s• �wL '•C�N w=G o 4 N N Nfti fOB CO C O C1 UC1 . 1:11 CD0 G O CD cL]�7O - 0m w -a N � O . O C GC� O S0 C0 L cz a O 0 C C O O 0 cn p O 'N O U OC CD d O [ a)tM CD 0- CD N O L "QCD NC ] ri E C C C G G Mm - 0 ND.� a oLo o ('- CFz mo p �o oo � V � o Q � o •o )� � UUL n . OOw UmrG o G a O 0- L - ° co p2O O3 C7 N N LD U O � - O CDO a O OC � 0O CaTG .0 G _ r Q _ V Q en = -ie CD 0 A L.i -p ai � 0 ❑ a � "o M '•E oa o m ai0) tL LU O 0mM0 0 ] G1N .- c Gv ? o ❑ -OL X ❑ U C) mO eVFf7 I a LL