Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998/04/15 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL 1 AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MlgETINGS 1 st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. April 15, 1998 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Counciimembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Jack Lain, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: A. CALL TO ORDER Alexander , Biane , Curatalo , and Williams __ B. ANNOUNCEMr=NTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of 10-year service award to E. David Barker. Presentation by students from Cucamonga Middle School regarding environmental work at Red Hill Park. Presentation of a Proclamation to the Families and Fdends of Murder Victims (FFMV) in recognition of National Victim's Week. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring the week of Apdl 13 - 18, 1998, as National Library Week. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing April 20 - 26, 1998, as Architecture Week. Presentation of a Proclamation congratulating the City of Rancho Cucamonga Youth Basketball Boys Division "C" Cavs for their Inland Valley Municipal Athletic Association Championship victory, and their 2nd place victory in the Southern California Municipal Athletic Association Finals. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/25/98 and 4/1/98 and Payroll ending 3/19/98 for the total amount of $2,066,732.00. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 1998. Approval for advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Rancho Cucamonga construction and installation of ballfield lighting for Etiwanda Creek Park, to be funded from Park Development Funds (Fund 20). RESOLUTION NO. 98-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF BALLFIELD LIGHTING FOR ETIWANDA CREEK PARK Approval of request from Marks Cablevision to waive City fees for the Rancho Rally (Mini Grand Prix Race) to be held on June 27, 1998. Approval of appropriation of funds for a California Department of Aging Grant in the amount of $3,000 for Senior Citizens Outreach Services (FY 1997-98 - Acct. 01-132-4532-1300). Approval of appropriation and purchase of ballfield light poles for the Etiwanda Creek Park facility and appropriation of $32,500 from Park Development Funds (Fund 20). Approval of a Resolution supporting Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) funding application for additional Metrolink rail cars. RESOLUTION NO. 98-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY'S (SCRRA) FUNDING APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL METROLINK RAIL CARS 11 16 17 21 24 26 27 3O City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 3 10. 11. Approval of City co-sponsorship of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All-Star Games on June 9, 1998 (CO98-017). Approval of contract (CO98-018) for display of Vietnam Memodal Moving Wall. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 148 32 85 in the amount of $30,000.00, for CUP 93-46, located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for MDR 96-06, located at the south side of Base Line Road, west of Carnelian. Release: Faithful Performance Bond 184 54 25 $5,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 98-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 96-06, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 31 34 38 39 4O E. CONS~=NT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A REVISION TO THE CITY'S PURCHASING ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 328B (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 3.08 OF TITLE 3 OF CHAPTER 3.08 THERETO, AND REVISING THE ClTY'S PURCHASING SYSTEM 41 City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 4 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request for Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Amendment 96-03B and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-01 to change the land use designation from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 35.65 acres of land located on the east side of the future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; General Plan Amendment 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 97-01 to change the land use designation UC to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and 1-15; and the consideration by the city of alternative land use designations of Low Residential 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units) for the project site between Highland Avenue and Church Street - APN: 227-091-41,227-201- 33, 227-351-65, 227-393-01 and 02-, and 229-021-56. Related General Plan Amendments will be considered on April 15, 1998. (Related files: GPA 96-03B and 97-01, VCPA 96-01 and 97-01) RESOLUTION NO. 98-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 96-03B AND 97- 01, AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 96-01 AND 97-01 WITH A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-41,227- 201-33, 227-351-65, 227-393-01 AND 02, AND 229-021-56 57 187 City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 96-03B SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), on 35.65 acres of land located' on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; and the consideration by the City of Alternative land use designation of Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between the Railroad Tracks and Base Line Road -APN: 227-091-41,227-393-01 and 02, and 227-351-65. RESOLUTION NO. 98-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 96-03B, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM UTILITY CORRIDOR TO LOW RESIDENTIAL, AND LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 35.65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 227- 091-41,227-393-01 AND 02, AND 227-351-65 CONSIDI=RATION OF FNVIRONM!=NTAL ASSESSMPNT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY P!AN AMFNDMFNT 96-01 - SOUTH!=RN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request to amend the Community Plan to change the Development Distdct from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), on 35.65 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; the consideration by the City of alternative Development District of Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between the Railroad Tracks and Base Line Road; and the consideration to modify the ultimate width of the parkway at the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard from 7 to 25 feet - APN: 227-091-41,227- 393-01 and 02, and 227-351-65. ORDINANCE NO. 587 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 96-01, CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FROM UTILITY CORRIDOR/OPEN SPACE TO LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING 213 243 213 24~ City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 o UNITS PER ACRE) AND LOW-MEDIUM RESII~ENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 35.65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE FAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND MODIFYING THE ULTIMATE WIDTH OF THE PARKWAY AT THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM 7 TO 25 FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 227~91-41,227- 393-01 AND 02, AND 227-351-85 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMF:NT 97-01 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation Utility Corddor (UC) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line and I-15; and the consideration by the City of alternative land use designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between Base Line Road and Church Street -APN: 229-021- 56 and 227-201-33. RESOLUTION NO. 98-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM UTILITY CORRIDOR TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL, AND REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL FOR 48.5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN BASE LINE ROAD AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 229- 021-56 AND 227-201-33 CONSIDFRATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request to amend the Community Plan to change the Development Distdct from Utility Corridor (UC) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and 1-15; the consideration by the City of alternative land use designation of Low residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium 213 251 214 City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 7 Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between Base Line Ro~d and Church Street; and the consideration to modify the ultimate width of the parkway at the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard from 7 to 25 feet - APN: 229-021-56 and 227- 201-33. ORDINANCE NO. 588 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01, CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FROM UTILITY CORRIDOR TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL, AND REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL FOR 48.5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN BASE LINE ROAD AND 1-15 FREEWAY, AND MODIFYING THE ULTIMATE WIDTH OF THE PARKWAY AT THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM 7 TO 25 FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-021-56 AND 227-201-33 254 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items submitted. H, CiTY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. REVIEW OF REQUEST FROM MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION TO WAIVE CITY FEES FOR THE "RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOST WANTED FUNDRAISER" TO BE HELD ON MAY 20. 1998. AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) 259 262 City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 RESOLUTION NO. 98-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO, 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE). RESOLUTION NO. 98-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) APPROVAL OF RFSOLUT!ON I=STABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN THF ALTA LOMA CHANNFL DISTRICT NO. 84-2. THF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAINAGF DISTRICT NO. 86-2 AND THF MILLIKEN SOUTH OF ARROW DISTRICT NO. 89-1 AND MASI PLAZA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-01 WITHOUT AN !NCRI=ASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 98-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1R (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 98-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1R (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) 263 274 275 281 282 284 285 City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 9 APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO~ 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITH NO INCREASE RESOLUTION NO. 98-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) 292 294 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. REPORT FROM THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SUBCOMMI'I-rEE ON FOUNDATION REALIGNMENT 2. REPORT ON CAR THEFTS AT CITY FACILITIES UPDATE ON THE CITY'S USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES FOR AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS 4. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE PARKS & FACILITIES UPDATE 1. Lions East Community Center 2. Lions West Community Center 3. Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center 4. R.C. Family Sports Center 5. Skate Park 6. Stadium 7. Heritage and Red Hill Parks 8. Etiwanda Creek Park 9. All Park Facilities COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 1. Seniors 2. Teen Activities 3. Youth Activities 4. R.C. Family Sports Center 5. Youth Sports 6. Adult Sports 7. Satellite Registration location 8. Community Wide Special Events 9. Trips and Tours 10. Human Services 302 305 306 City Council Agenda April 15, 1998 10 11. Senior Van Transportation 12. Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall 13. Epicenter J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNM!=NT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS POTENTIAL LITIGATION - ONE CASE - PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9, I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Apdl 9, 1998, seventy-two (72) hours pdor to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CiTY OF R~CI..l(3 CtJCAI"IOI"dG~ I. !lit OF MANNAN~ FOR PERIOD: RUN D~TE: 03/29/~ PAGE: ',/I. NrKIR 14~/~lT. ZIEI"I DEBCRIPTIC)N 14NIR NO blad~R. A/IT. ee CHECK# C~ERLAP 403 HU~TUN IHlk,H,xI l(~kN_, i~. ~NTE~E ~PLZEB ~ 12~7e 237.0b CCC 12~48 - i2~47 IO~99 ~iti. Pl'/~11 I,I ~;I HESTERN REBERVAT]~ 125249 - ~()63 CITY CI.IItK~ A',%(ICIAll(~ fiF C~IF'. CITY GLERK'B ~ C~, i2~9e 970.~ ;*~)460 Pt~, FAY[ RECR~TZ~ HE}'UND IO6gb TUUD, UH~F RECR~TI~ REF~ ~2~3e 44~ ~ C A C k u ~ ~~IP ~B ~2~4e 463~ A · K P~llll(;U,~i'iiY P~TO DE~I~ b ~PLZE8 ~2~7 6.70 ~04~t AltF. YTA, ~G(: ~ RECREAT;~ REF~D ~/~b ACII~ ~[ RECREATZ~ ~PLIEB ~(t4bL' ADVI~.A, I~lHIl~l RECR~ATZ~ HEROD 4069 ~1. UEATHFH HillIF I~ NE~BILITATI~ PN~ :*~7U ~PfRI, MEL*rJII ~TR~T~ PAYMENT 66~ ARN~FAI~ CHi'i)I f ~1~ Vi~ ~T~Y BILLX~ e 12~ ~9. 42 ~472 BlG~ .~ , tH(~Y 0 ~E OF PAINTZ~ PA~ 1~47 OL~E P~'FH CQ_~ , INC REGHEATZ~ ~PLIEB 1~4 ~. 73 4 ~,~ BKOD~r B~:~ LIBR~Y ~LIES 116t, BR~iCK DFI It CREEK LANES Z~T~T~ PA~ENT 4~03 C A Y ~ 0 ~~ZP ~B 2~2~ CA;E ~1 !(~ REFRE~B 12~72 242. ~40 CAL;F. P~ ~, ~ECREAT~ SOCZETY ~B~Z~ ~ZBTZ~B 12~73 ~S76 CALII~N]A CHINE PREVENTI~ ~HBER~IP ~g 4~ C~IF~NIA TfiANSHISSI~ VEHICLE MZNTE~E 473~ C~OLY~]C SAFETY ~]NTE~E B~PLZ~ 12~7& 76. ~4 t223 C~SENSE OFFICE/~I~E~CE E~IP~T 60 CENIN~ ClTll.t~ 51ON SERVICE. ~INTE~E S~PLZEI ZBM78 ~. 33 20476 CHEETHAfi, Ull I I~ RECR~TI~ REF~D 411ll CIli Vt(~ U :.~ A. Ir4c OA~ZNE CI~OE8 12~ 99. 17 V4~ CI ~(K, K~ILN I~TR~I~ PAVM~T 4'14't CI. UU I REOZBTRATI~ 12~4 CITY OF RANCHO LIGT OF blAIINAiNTI FOIl PINZO0: 03-~"9~ RUN DATE: 02/2S/9e ~.'ENDOR ~ .i'rEl'l DEI:~RZPTION blANR 140 HdM~R. ~IT. eo CHECK41 OVERLAP :'470 COL. TON TRUCK ,~UPPLY VEHICLE HAINTIENANCE BUPPLIEE 12see6 9. 70 4001 COFIPF. TH(X. HANUFACTUIIINO, iNC. I~INTEMMICE IUPPLZLrl 4301 COIqPUSA, INC. I~INTENMICE B~PLIEI !~ I&e. 09 63:3 C(IN~rA. II)A11(I) I~ ICIRIC,M. DIBT, fiAINTENMICE BUPPL. IEI %)~ &. 00 6:33 CON!Kt4, II)Alrl) ri I CTHTCA~ Di~T. ISAINTIKI BUPPLZEB 12~l .~OOhl C(]~IDUIqA, I(N~A P~IbYICHI3CN. BUPPLIEI 12~)e92 100, 00 ~O~J:)(~ CONNI'IE~EH, (;i.I NNA RECRIATIUN REFUND 1:,~141~ 31, 04) U:) CUCAPIONOA CO W^trR DIGT IM]NTHLY MATER BILLINGI :)/40 CUC~dIONQA FLOt41H CO. RECREATION IEIIVICEE 12049e ~5. OO 251,.~ D.A R I~ AFtFI~I('A D.A. II.E. HATERIAI- l;i~e4KI~ 4°'7~) 44U8 D~-~IDE¥IRIAN, KATHY INBTI~UCT011 PAYI'q~NT 12~K)O 9B. 20 ~?B4 DAI~Y MHEEL ~ IUUC~I CO, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES .~.405 DAPPL'R T!1tF. cI) , INC VEHICL. E I,~INTEN~M4CE E BIJPPLIEG 120902 2,040. 44 5130 DIN14~ID FL'I~.I ¢:o BL/~PLIEBIB[RVICE 12~P03 4~0. 4)0 4:)44 DICK, E#!C EIqPLOYEE 01r THE I~INTH 41 12~104 7~.00 ;.M7~ DUNN-EDkM~D,~ (;I)RI'L)RATIUN f541NTENAI~E BUPPLIEI 1~,~90~ 110.70 ~;364 £1GHIH AYF.NUt GI(~d'HIC8 OFFICE ~JPPLIE~II 12~1K3~ 70~. 47 :3A]4 ELITE IO!41fIC TOMII~ BERVZCE 125907 276. ~47~) FN P01N/F C011PUTER E~UIPHENT & IUPPLTE8 41 i2~FOe 1,302. 7& ?.~9 EI4INO IRHIOA! I(IN PRODUCT8 IRRIG~T![1N BUPPLIEB 125~O9 40. 26 4~14 EXCLU$1VI~ E~(:I ~ OFFICE 8UPPL!EB 41 125910 ~6. ~7 ~o4:~' rARR~N. UONNA RECRE&T 10N la~l I ~0. 00 123 FEDEH~. E~PRk.~'; COHP DELIVENY lIENVICE 125912 30. 75 2840 FORD OF U~LN~P, INC. VEHICLE FIAINTENANCE 125913 28. 27 5:)3~ rOSIER, IX~i.~rr, ~. & REYNOLDB PROFEBBIONAL BERYlCEIl 41 t2~14 144.04) 1(~1~ rRANKI. IN (MII .%.'1 co OFFICE BU~PLIEE 41 :)7:37 Od171E ROC~ GALl.FRY RECIIE~TION 41 125916 3, 242. 10 ;J3tb (JA~BOY INTOfiNAl l(3e, M~, INC pRC~rF..JtEl0Ndld. BER¥lCII 12591?' 1, 06~. :Be 3':~UIJ GOLDEN' I~I-.AH AHHL)I( ISI 5, INC, PROFE~ION~L. liENviGil 41 l~911 1 l. :)40. 00 :)'!l-'~ QOODtIEAItl, r^L, A INSTRUCTOIl PEYHENT 1aO919 &O3. 00 .'~l.'"o Q~I)ON, I,IILI. 1AH INITRUCTOO PAYHENT 43U& OREGORY, CHI:R 1 INSTRUCTOIl P&YIq~NT I~)~EI~I 4~. 04) 131 0TE CALIIONNIA HONTHL. Y lll. rd~HONE BIL.L. INel 41 Z~)9'da 610,90 ~6,J,9 ~,q~Af10L)~ IJI:V&R,'~GI~ C:UfiPN4Y RECREATIGN B~JPPi. IEB 51;)9 HA~RIt~. dan[-5 T RE018TRATION I~EI~4 6~). 4)0 :)077 HEAP ~C]4qTHTAI; RECREATION ~/PPLIEI 129~'d5 16. 112 3334 lt£11.1(3, KELLY zNBTRUCT011 PAYI~ENT 5460 HIDAt. CO, Cd!~,lLt'~ INSTRUCTOR PAYFIENT 43~ HIND~HLIT~R. d~ LLamAS & ~GSOCIATEB ~-EB TAX 4~)!T Ib~l )IOLI.IUAY Hl'j¢;14, (O , IN(.: FIAINTENANCE liUPPLIEI 1211929 ~)34. 04) I,'~'-J4 iIUE[I'IA~I 14AINTENANC, E SUPPL. IEI I209"J0 19e. BO Ihl HIlYT II./HIIIll (*ll , .~ H HAINTENANCE 6UPPLIEI It 12~)931 16B. 31 ;'41~TM. HOYT, RA¥1~dI~ INBTRUCTL~ PAYRENT 120932 l, 416. :J((.q)/l HYAT 1 #f. GkN(:V ICl'~ PIEETIN0 3oo'11 HYA! 1 HI:.GEN( Y lcHA flEETING 1211934 120. 00 300! I HYA [ I' I4*EGFNC¥ ICM H~ETIN0 1299'J~ 120.00 49~ IIYI)H0--BCAP[ f~.t)D.(;lB, INC LNql)IC,N'E I~INTENMIGE Iq, IPI~IEE 167 [ (' ~ [1 HAINTENANCE 8UPPL!II 4l.t! ! q)Nl( PkklNTE, NKIr UUPFLZEI 4P 120938 0, o63. 79 CITY OF NANClIO CU~AI'IQNG~ L ! GT OF W~UIANTB FOR PliRIOD: 03-~'4~1 (97/9S) RUN D~TE: 03/2~/fI~ PAGE: 3 V~N~ NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION I,k~RR NO WARR. ANT. ! o# CHECKI OVERLAP IBM CO~Pt*J~A'! [IJN ~I~E~E S~PLX[[ ~ IE~ 1,~1. ~7~6 INL~U E~IHF :~OCCEN REFERE~ AB~. HEN'G ~C~ PR~ ~ ~25~41 1~2 INLAND [.~IHI~ ';TAG~S. LTD. TR~TAT~ SERVXCEB ~29~42 V2 !~D V~.I [Y PAII.Y B~A. LETIN ~B~RIPTI~ 12~44 3~. ~315 I~D ~L~At.L ~SENY ~INT~E B~PLIEB ~ 12~45 1~. 1941 JACOfi~EN DIVI'.IUN ~r TEXTR~, 1~. ~]NT B~PLZEB ~ 1aa947 ~o KELLY p~,~ll (:IIMI'ANY P~ER S~PLIEB 12~ 14. ~04~6 ~OL~TAD, D~V f J) RECREATI~ 12~9~1 4~U2 KUR~I)A CUN';I~,UC I ION C, D O. O 12~O~ 4~6, I 7~ KU~I ~IVICII, i)l Jill J L i~TRt~T~ PAYHENT · 1~52 'J'~V I.Aff. Jh< ~ L.EAQUE NEETI~ 129994 I9~ LANC[', filN.I Y, I U~IIAND ~DIT 6ERVICEB t2~95 %916 LAS HtI~;A~; .- I rt~A ~fIRCINI I~TR~T~ PAYMENT 12~ 126.~ ~/0~ LEXM~K INTEUIa,%I lOlL, INC. ~NTE~E 1~7 464a LI~;O IN~/Rll/JAI ELECTRONIC~ ~XNTE~E e 12~9~ 1, 174. 200 L~ ~[t ES 11.FS SUBgCRIPTI~ 1259~ 4~. ~:313 L.O~F, MA. IAAr;t Z~TR~T~ PAYMENT 12~61 l~, 54~ ~IPi)T~A ~lNI I(.UL IUR~ ENI. l~. L~C~E MINTE~E 12~62 4~. 4101 ~NS~I.I_, ~vi ViA RECREATI~ REF~D 12~ ~3. ~0 MARTINEl ~IIJN ~FRVICE TOW[~ SERVICE5 · 120964 ~. .IO4~O MART itaFZ, ~HA RECREATI~ 12~6~ 37, RHZI fiAI'[ '~ H~DWAIII B~1~66 L!CE~E RE~ · %2~67 304~3 ~1T50~, HiCHFt I E RECREATI~ 12~0 27. ~433 NIT~OS, NICHI~I l_E ~BSCRIPTI~ I2~l 3~4,~ ~ I gD 1 N, DN ~ RECREAT I ~ t 2~72 ~0. ~707 ~EY ~TTER~ C~TI~ 8ERVICE8 t2~973 2248 ~A AUICI PAH I ~ VEHICLE ~!NT~E e · 12~74 ~. ~741 NAT'L BU~[HI.~;', I:fiPLOYMENT NEEKLY NENE~ l~O ~,~ ~473 NIGHTLINE 51.LUI;ITY PAfR~ 8EC~ITY IERVICE 12}~?i 7~. 40~3 ~LC. [NO C~U 8ERVICEI C~Oll ta~7 4040 ~1) tricKilY (:(.d51Hk~i l~ C~FFEY GMCIA B~N C~T. t21979 101,~. :~/,3 ~1) OUA~H PAINI COHPANY ~INTE~E ~PLIII Z~9~ 231. ~77 DI Y~r'IC ~TU~ll)~;. INC ]N~TR~T~ PAYMENT 1~1 a,~l.~ 3072 ON1ARIO AIRPI.IItf HARRT~TT DEPOgIT lg~ 3~4 ONTARIO ICE S~ATINO CENTER I~TR~T~ PAY,E~ ta~ 676. 5461 ORCI4~D 5t~Pi.Y HAHDMAHE ~[NTE~E S~PLIEB · laS~4 ~v;,I P A P A PESTICIDE ~PLICAT~8 ~Z~ 1~ 1441 pAclric IIEI.L ~l~lI.E 5ERVICE~ ~INTE~E 8~PLIE8 · 12~ I B;'3 PAGI:N[ f P~I~ BERV!CE : · [29~7 6~. CITY OF' R~4CHQ CUCAI, K~NGA L ! ~T OF bI~qRANTB FOR PERIOD: 03--2O,-q'O (97/90) VFNDOR N~M'IE ITEfi DESCRIPTION RUN DATE: 03/29/~ PAOE: 4 777 PEP IlOV~ ~q7 PI40TOHAX St~PI Y CO 4~54 PITASS], PEIER J ~04~4 PLANLT KIU~ ~5~ PC)f'~ DI$1RIfiuIIr40 CO ]049 POMONA VALLFY KAgABAKI 271~ PONCHAUD, JANICE 693 POMERSTRIDE D^I [£RY CO , l~. 7~B PHAXAIH DgS1HII;UIlON, INC. P~UD[NTI~ I~VI UAIL fi~PLY P~C 1ELEC~MUNICAl'!ON~ CO , ~, R 14 H AUTUHO! IL'L R D U E~!P~iNI CO R~ftU C~AHIIN(;A POLICE DEPT R~JLNblEIN, {I I) , 1~, JLRRY ROIAHY (~PfJIIt~I I(JN G~ UERN~DINII CO~TY FIRE DEPT. r~NTANA, [ ] V 11 H ~;CI~I IlA~11 111111 (:A I'LA~I ~[NIUH INF~H/,1 JUN SHEPAtiO, C~111 f~KII I_ PAIli, S~H[ ~, FINAl SO (ALIF' OA~ 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32;' SP~RKL.E T TS loeb30 ~PECIAI. rY CrlNCF;EIE INC I,"~'."ll tilAf r 114~'~ fil. lfVl('l'.~, INC, Tl-tf~t~l~ 4;01'/ !;111 I1,1, ,1 .'.1 I !i~11.11; ''" ! IIUI~ VEHICLE I'~l),n'~l M~INTEN/dMCE IUPPLIE! ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT DEPOBIT/F]F. LD TR]P VEHICLE ~ZNTE~E V~ICLE ~INTE~E ~P~lll Z~TR~T~ PAYHENT VEHICLE ~INTE~E ~PLIEB ~INT/RECREAT~ I~TR~TOR PAYMENT C~CE VEHICLE ~ZNT BERVICE~IEB C~ICATI~ CHLOE REIHB~EHENT ~iNIE~E ~PLIEB aAFETY BOOTB HEF~D P~RB DE~CT[~ PRINT~~ T[RE REPAIR B~I~BB LICE~E REF~ ~BBCRIPTI~ ~T~Y ~ERVICE ~ER~D T~S I~TR~T~ PAYMENT IN~TR~T~ PAYMENT B~INI.S5 LICE~E REF~ !~TR{~T~ PAYMENT OFFICE 8~PLIE8 REN~ D~P~IT REF~ I~TR~T~ PAY~EN; I~TR~Y~ DAY C~ B~PLIE8 B~INEB8 LICENSE REF~DB ~T~.Y O~ R~QI~TR~TZ~ ~T~Y ELECTRIC ~T~Y SERVICE B~INES~ LICENSE 174.66 d~.12 1,102.23 30.00 13,102.99 B2~.48 147.60 310.68 111.61 3, 437. 2, 663. 405. 2, 919,. ~30. 1, 92'3. 46. 601. ~, 107. 160. 14. 7~P. 312. 9, 314. 2, 300. 423. 313. 312. 93. 44. 200. 302. 216. 99. 36. 27. 9,955. 37. &7. 34. 48. ~0 44 O0 00 34 O0 O0 ~0 46 40 7O 4O !,7 63 49 O0 ~0 50 14 C I '1Y OF #ANCHO CUCAIqONQA L 1 ST OF I, IARRANTii FOR PERIOD: 03-:2~)-~ (9?/98) RUN DATE: VFN~r~t NAr~ %TEN DE~RZPT%~ ~R ~ ~R, ~T. ee CHECK~ OVERC~ ';/~sLI ~YfilY~ I)I.~ICII P~INTER i~6049 473. 02 Io~,:t;' I n ES~HO~ ~;l~VlCE~ BUSINESS LICE~E fiEF~ 1~60~ 62. 10o:J:] TANDE, ~ttl IA B~INESS LICENGE REF~ 12~}l 6. 17 '!~ 11-HI(Y, [)(~NA INSTRgT~ PAY~[NT 12~3 ~73. '(.,l ]tllll[JI)l AUX. Di~;JAI h REF~D PER8 DED~TI~ 12~4 q44H ~F. AUUAY C;(A~'~(:~; P~ICE DEPT ~PPLIEB 12~ 37. 41,4t, 'IRI DIH l*11.111( (.U~ANY ~INTE~[ ~PLIEB 12~7 17~.60 4~ t) ~; CUAfil)~ i'll , INC 8EC~ZTY O~D 6EHVICE g ~2~S9 l(tt,~d, tiNifaD liETAil , INC B~INESS LICE~E REF~ 126~2 23.~ '~!'; ~)rli I I-U ~AY MEETI~ 126063 40. ',~'; ' UI'IJI AI. INC ~]NT ~PL IES 126064 722. I()~,'i~ VAII I',)ll, .111HII CLAIH8 SE1TI.EM~N1 126~ · ,.'rib VI~IN(; Ill~t VEHICLE R~PI.]I.~ ~ 1~67 1,~. IO'~ '/151~ t'AINI fiAINT SUPPLIES ~ 12~ 64. 72 ~l · Vl,P.'l,Vl LIBR~Y 5~PLIE5 1~6069 64. t()53~ ~AL tqAH[ .1cl2,' BUSINEBS LICEN~E REF~ 126070 47t~ ~;%RREN if. C(I · (ARL LIABILITY CLAIH~ ~ 126071 ~70. 213 ~AXIE, KI.[FN-L INE C(IRP ~INT '6~PLIEB e 1~7~ 4577 ~ELi.~ FARGO Ct)AUD SERVICE~ ~ECURITY QU~D 5ERVICE~ 126073 t, 10~. 77 ~o~ XEHIIx ~OF;PU~A~ iON C~Y ~CH]NE S~PLIE~/BERV]CE ~ ]2b075 ~, 2~. 02 t~to Zt t 1 [~I;I:R~, U()I) HE IMB~SE~NT 12607A 487. e.. TOTed. 3:26, 330. 37 CITY Of RANCHO CUCANONGA LIST Of NABRANTS FOR PeRIOOI 0,'01-91 (07/tl) RUN OATel 04/Ol/~i PAGEZ I VENDOR fane ' ITEN OeSCRIPTION ¥ARE NO fARED A#T. 5364 KOTZEN & ASSOCIATES, R. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1242075 2oOS3.BO 36115 P. ZoP. PRINTING eta3 BUSINESS LICENSE EEPUNO IZSIS6e 30.00o 10611 PAOZLLAe ANDRE, RECREATION REFUNDS 12S777 200.00- (¢¢ 125771 - 225970 (¢4 lZsg?2 - 1Z601~ ~029 SAN OERNAROX#O COUNTY PXRE OEPT. tR~OERGROUNO TANKS 126019 2tJOOoes- C(¢ 126020'- 126076 20487 OePToOP ALCOHOL &ORUG SERVICES COUPBRONCO REGISTRATION 126077e SO.00 (¢¢ 126078 - 126079 ZTJ2 ABC LOCKSfilTHS fAINTCHANCe SUPPLIES I 126080 208087 14 ACTZON TRAVEL AGENCY fINANCIAL/LEGISLATIVE NTG lZ608X ITT.00 20491 AUOY, CAROL ReCReATXOfi REFUND 126002 38.00 1U26 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONe BILLINGS 12608~ 175o01 4207 ALERT CON#UNICATIONS CO. INSTALLATION/SeRVICE 226084 660.72 ]191 ALHBLAOt KEN E. INSTRUCTO~ PAY#efT 126085 50.00 ~0~63 ALTA LONA APPLIANCE SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE WePUNO 126086 20464 ALTA LOqA/~PLANO CHIROPRACTIC M4JSINeSS LICeNSe EePUNO 126017 61086 20490 AdERXCAN ASPHALT OVERPAY#EfT ON RIO PACKET X26088 15.00 20386 ANEqlCAN fiGHE INPRDVENENT PRODUCTS REFUND J 126080 72.50 20465 ANGELS ALBERTS,NS CENTER BUSINESS LICENSE EEPUNO 126090 152.30 20~6 A~DENT NEeIT CO. BUSZNESS LICeNSe tePUNO 126001 46.00 5243 A~LY SOUND PEOPe$SIONAL SeeVIOlS 1~6o9~ 20489 ARHA LEGAL IlQUIEeNeNTS 126093 T~.00 20467 ARNOLO PAL#ER GOLF ACAOEfiV eOSINeSS LICeNSe RePUNO 126004 66072 667 ARRO#HeAO C~EOIT U#ZON VlSi HONTNLV BILLINGS e 1260~5 1,641o66 20468 AUTO CRLLULA~ II dUSEMeSS LICENSE lIPUfO 126006 46.00 5229 B 8 t SURVEYING IN$TRUfieNTS, INC. NAINTeNANCE SU~PLIeS · I2609r 65034 20469 8ARAG D.O. oSTEVeN N BUSINESS LICJNSe leeufo 1260~B 23.01 20470 BATC#eLQR - ATTORNEY, kILLINN I~SI#eSL LICENSE REPUNO 126099 40.99 47 8ELL & NOYELL PROPeSSIONAL SerVICe · 126100 399062 20471 BELL AIR HEATING & AXE CONOXTXO#XNG OUSZNESS LICENSE RBPUNO 126~01 14040 444I BEST BUY CO., INC. OPPICe SUPPLIES IZ6102 6044 1478 iNI BUXLOXNG HEYS SUBSC4IPTION XZ6103 ~84o77 703 &O~ AND EO'S GLASS PEQPeSSIO#AL SErVICeS I26104 822.82 2047~ BOLING N.O., EUGENE P. BUSINESS LICENSE eeFUNO 126105 IS.00 ZS5~ C A L 8 0 CALBO ASH NEETING 126106 150.00 2SS~ C A L B 0 CALIO ABN #leTlUG 126107 ASS.el 1~1~ C.#.ToA. CoN,T.A, HERTING · I~6108 IS0000 20474 CAL-NEON SIGNS BUSINESS LICENSE OePUNO 126100 21.60 121~ CA&SENSe OPPICe/#AXNTeNANCe eGUIPNeNT 0 I16110 1,534.94 2571 CARDINAL INDUSTRIAL FINISHES ~AINTe#ANCe SUPPLIES d IZ6111 305.47 481 CARE ANeRXCA ~EALTN PLAN #eOlCAL PEeNXUH 1~6112 32~354.88 20~75 CARPENTER INC. t JEFF IUSINESS LICENSe EePUNO 126113 98.00 1061 CHANPION AMAROS L SPECIALZTXES ENGRAVEO PLA~Ue 126114 58.19 1061 CNAfiPZOH AMAROS & SPECIALITIES eNGRAVeD PLAUUE 126115 ~SoB6 713 C' '%'$ SPORTING GOOOS INC RECREATION SUPPLIES I IZ6II6 Z4SoSd CITY Of RANCHO CUCANONGA LIST uP tEARRANTS fOR PERZOOZ 04-01-91 C97/91) RUN DATE: 0,/01/91 PAGE: 2 OVERLAP T* CITY RENTALS EQUZPHENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES ~ 126117 20*80 COHHUNzTY SPARKS CONCERTS ZN THE PARK 126118 6*3 COHPUTERLA#O CO#PUTER #AZNTENANCE/SUPPLZES 126119 zO*T7 COPP XNOUSTRXAL #AMJPACTURZNG ZNCo RUSXHESS LICENSE RePUNO 126120 20*91 CPRS OISTRICT Xl FEE fOR BANQUET ANARO 126121 ,610 CREATIVE LZGHTINO NAZNTE#ANCE SUPPLIES 126122 S3'9 CREATIVE NANAGENE#T SOLUTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 126123 (¢C 12612* - 126126 85 CUCANONGA CO WATER DIST NONTHLY MATER BZLLZNGS I 116127 5401 CUSTO# HXCROFZLH SYSTENS, ANCo OFFICE SUPPLIES 126128 20~78 CYCLE SNZTHS INC. 6USXNESS LICENSE REFUND 126129 239 0 L K CONCRETE CO STREET NAZNTENANCE · 126130 1291 DATAVAULT - U.S. SAFE DEPOSTT CO. OAT& STORAGE 126131 $111 Oe VO0~AT~ SCOTT J. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~ 1161~2 · 011 OELTA LIGHTING SYST~HSt INC. ~ZNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 1261)3 TO2 OEPT- OF T#ANSPOKTATXDN TRAffIC SIGNAL HAZNTENANCE 126134 ~07 OETCO OFfICe SUPPLI~S I 126135 ~875 OUNN-EO¥AROS CORPORATION #AXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 126136 ~77 E S R X, XNC. SOFTHARE SUPPORT PEER X16137 779 E-Z RENTS RECR~ATIO# RENTAL 126138 20,79 E.L A. HANAG~HENT CO. BUSINESS LICENSE REPUNO 126139 5510 EARTH PROTECTZQN SERVICES. INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1261,0 20,81 ELITE PERSQNkEL SERVICES INC. BUSINESS LICENSE IEPU~ 126141 20,~0 EdBER INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 1261*Z ~29 eNXNG XRRXGATXON PROOUCTS X~ZGATXON SUPPLIES · 1~6~44 4~10 FAX FUHER g ASSOCIATES, X~. OFfiCE SUPPLIES ~bX4] FAMOUS POOT~EAR 1587 BUSINESS LZCENSE REPUNO ~26~46 L23 F~OERAL EXPRESS CO~P DELIVERY SERVICE J lZ6147 LZ~ FENCE C~AFT OF UPLAND, INC. M XNTENAKE SUPPLIES 126148 ~6144 FIBRE CONTAINERS C~PANY 8USZNESS LICENSE RerUm 126~9 LS5 F~LARSKY L NATT KNTHLT ~081 FINAL FINISH OETAXL 3L~7 F[~E AASTE~ MZNTENANCE SerVICE ~Z6XSZ · MgS FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ZZ6XS3 36~45 FLEET FUELS LLC ~STNe~S LICENSE REFUND 126~S4 36146 FLE~XNG PAZNTNG INC. BUSINESS 36~47 fOOTHXLL FAMILY OENTXST~Y BUSINESS LICENSE REFFUW 126~57 36148 fO~EHOST PACKAGING BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 1261S8 1082 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. OFFICE SUPPLIES 36~50 FULL~ER CONST~TXON BUSINESS LICENSE REPU~ ~16161 744 FUNDSELECT OEFERREO CONP 126162 ~208 GARRETT COHC. ~ORXHG & RAKING, ZHC. NAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 126163 36151 GOLOEN STATE FENCE COIlPANT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 126164 361SZ ~RXPB ~OBERT C. REFUNO PARKING CZTATZ~ 126165 137 ~TE CALXPORNX~ HO~THLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS ~ 126168 4486 GUARDIAN RIOXCAL PllnXUN ~16X69 5340 HAPPY CRO~D~ THE R~C~EATZON 126170 413.13 39.00 2e109o14 11.92 SO.00 8o760.00 1,190.00 6e970o44 836.12 1S~20 1oR02.13 AO.9S i40000 R,722~91 33094 48.72 387.9O S70.62 15.00 60.00 ~0o00 19.78 17.72 EATESS 55.00 35°65 108018 11o99 93?°$0 270.00 612.9S 43o8~ 81o00 22.12 11.00 23o01 61.29 S.00 1S0.00 18.16 30.00 S,007.26 7S1.14 SO0.00 CITY Of RANCHO CUCA#ON4~A LIST Df ¥AREA#TS fOR PEI%Q08 04'"0%"'01 (97/$8) RUle OATEl 04/01/98 PAbE~ 3 8~ CHECK8 OVERLAP 30444 HARRISi JA#ES AUTO BUSINESS LICENSE 1261TX 9030 124, HAVEN 8UILOI#G MATERIALS ~ZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 2855 HAVEN WINE & LIQUOR COo $UI-CON#ZTTEE NEETINGS *62 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. IQUIP#EHT NAINTENAKe I IZ6~T4 67.25 5123 HEAD GEAR RECiEATIO# 12ATTO 168006 30*35 HIGH GRAOE PORN IMCo BUSINESS LICENSE 126IT6 I36. SS 4845 HXLLSXOE CON#UNITY CHURCH NONTNLV RENT IZ6ITT IlOO0000 4~8 HOCKEY ¥EST RECREATION IZ6~TO 8~0o42 :58 ROLLZOAY ROCK CO., INC. NAINTEkAKE SUPPLIES 3~33 HO#ELE$S OUTREACH PRG PiS & EOUCAYZON NONTHLV SERVICES I26180 833000 3634 HOUSE Of RUT~ ~&~g4 CDOG CONTRACT IZBIIZ 633033 XbI HOYT LUHBER ¢O.e S.#. #AINTE#ANGE SUPFLItS 126683 4.56 4¥5 HVDRO-SCAP& PROOUCTSe INC LANOSCAFE #AINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8 126IE4 le020073 NO3 I C H A REVIlERENT TRUST-*ST OEPERREO CO#P I&&AES 2e325050 897 I.C.A.~ - CITRUS 8~LT CHAPTER ANNUAL #EWER·SHIP OURS 8 126186 ST.10 5647 XAEX #EMdEKSHZP OUES IZ6XI7 38.65 4254 XBR CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 126188 S25000 30446 X~ON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. BUSINESS LZCINSE IZ6IlO 23000 3U439 IHPRE$SXONS GOURHET CATERING OUSXNESS LXCENSO 126190 ~3.42 ~22! XNOEPENOENT EL~CTRDNXCS 14AINTENAHCE 126191 15~o00 92 ZNLANO VALLEY OAILY BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTIONS 126192 31092 2315 ZNLANO ##OLEOALE NURSERY NAXNTEHANCE SUPPLIES · 126193 480.26 z79 KAISER POUNOATXON FIEALTA PLAN ~OZCAL INSURANCE 126A94 248305o17 4X~8 KELLY E~UIPNENT VEHICLE SUPPLIES I ~26195 421.72 2220 KELLY PAPER CORPANY PAPER SUPPLIES J IZ6106 240015 30~38 KELLY~ LAWRENCE RECREATION lIBlOT '~ 4BOO0 30447 KZ#EALL, RoJ. CONSTRUCTION ,USINESS LICENSE 126198 6075 3044J KZRO NAHUFACTUkING BUSINESS LICENSE X26199 100050 S059 KINKOrS COPIES RECREATION SUPPLIES · I26200 64043 X228 KNOX NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 1~6201 255o~6 ~024 KOCH MATERIALS CO·PINY MAINTENANCE StJffPLllS 126202 14~.40 536q KOTZZN GASSQCIATES, R. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 126203 2~053o80 SS4~ L S A PAOPE&SIONAL SERVICES · A26204 2m3~3.92 8! LA VOZ AOVERTISIlOG I26ZOS 386.00 321 LANDSCAPE wEST, INC. LANOSCAPI MAINTENANCE m S26206 " 80880.46 849 LAWSON PROOUCTS, INC. NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 126207 149o73 4648 LINGO INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS #AZNT~NANCE IZ6208 409.45 30436 LOS ANGELES eUSXNE$S JOURNAL SUOSCRIPTION 126209 5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA OTL. CO. R~C~EATIOH SUPPLIES I26210 140.88 30442 LU#ED AUDIMESS LICENSE 12621X 43.90 600 LWNCH, JAMIE RECREATION SUPPLIES 1262~2 32.13 1062 R C Z TELECO#HUNICATIONS TELEPHONE SERVICES 8 2262~3 121.26 5732 # T X COLLEGE RiSC I IZBZZ4 240.00 3987 RoR.A.S.C. C/O GRA[XJATE CENTER FOR REHOERSHIP ONES 8 I26215 80000 30445 RACKE LAUNDRY SERVICE 6USXHESS LICENSE 126226 24073 549 RARXPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT.XNC. LANO$CBPE HAXNTENANCE 8 IZB21T 40,69X.0! S49 RARXPO~ HORTICULTURAL ENT.XNC. LANOSCAPE HAXNTENANCE 126218 6TO.00 72 HARK CHRIS, INC. V~#ICL! NAZNTENANC! SUPPLIES I26219 130o6~ ~727 HARSHALL PLUMBING REHAi. P~OGRAN 8 126220 S38.38 J044Q #~'~ALLi VEin ORY dLL INC. #USINtSS LICENSE IZ6ZZZ 135.90 J CITY OP RANCHO CUCANON&A LIST OP MARRANTS RUN OATEz VENOOR NANE %TEN OE$CIIPTION ~m~ NO ~A .... ANI. 30..8 #ASSEY, JI# POOL SERVIC~ ,~b~'~$~ LICENSE #C HASTKR-~A,~'b~P~LY ~., *T #AZNTENANCt SUPPLIES 30~43 ~OU~rAI,~ vJ, k IAK~ & ~PVI~F INC. oUbXN~S$ L~C:NSE ~d 'I~PA AUTO P~KT~ ¥~CLE HAI~T~NAfICE J,,~37 NAT[ONA~ #ia~Lr~LAC~ #~T~Hb ~*b2 N~TNOkK COPPUTr~ $YST~dS eUS~N~S$ LICENSE ~)67 U P A K C COeG ~.~ OTr. LAURA ZNSTRUCTOI $NR.EXEICISI CLASS 5343 PACIFIC PLUNRXNG SPECIALTIES ~#kZNTINANCE SUPPLIES 10618 PAOZLLA. ANOkEk R!CREATZO# REPUNOS 42~3 PAPER DIRECT, INC. ReCIEATION SUPPLIES S409 PARTSNASTER. INC. NAZNTENA#Cl SUPPLIIS *lT PATTON SALES CORP. IMZNTINA#CE SUPPLIES STZO PERVO PAINT CO. ~AI#TINANCE SUPPLIES 54~ PIP PRZ#TI#G RECREATZQ# SUrfLIES 25S PO#A OXSTRXSUTXN& CO VE#XCL! NAZNT~#ANCl & SUPPLIES ~2E6 P~ZNCIPRL NUTUAL NeOZCAL/DZSRIXLXTV Z#SIJBANCE 20*85 PROFIT RESOURCES INC. IUSXNESS LICENSE ~0.86 PRONOTIONS Xk NOTION I4JSXNISS LICENSE 6S PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY IMZNTENANCI SUPPLIES .199 QUALITY SLACKS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE SUPPLIES ZSX R L R AUTONQTIV~ VE#XCLE #AZ#T.$UPPLZES&SIRVZCE 44SX R.C. QUAKES PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL TGXP #ZNZ PLAN ~6~ RALPNS GROCERY CO#PANY RIC~EATZQN SUPPLIES biT4 RANCHO CUCA#QNGA PA#XLY YNCA PROGIA# A$SZSTA#C~ PROGRAIl BAS RED MING SHOE STORE SAPITT lOOTS 561R RZCHAROS~ NATRON, & GERSHON LEGAL SERVICES lO6]l RZC#LEZG# INVESTHINTS PIE#IT OVERPAYHINT 1063~ RICH#OHO A#ERZCA# PEKHXT OVERPAYHINT Z16 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS ~3~4 ROBINSON FERTXLZZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 4404 ROSS ASSOCIATES KAZNTENANCI SUPPLIES X6 ROTARY CORPORATION #AINTENANCE SUPPLIES 4438 S C A C E 0 ANNUAL #ENISERSHXP OUtS JOl SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CONTRACT S#ERXPPS SERVICE 30~ SAN RERN CO SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE 301 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICe SOl SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CAL-XD PROORAN $8X SAN 8ERNAROZkO COUNTY CAL-XO PROORAN SO~9 SAN RERNAROZNO COUNTY FIRE OEPT. UNOER&ROUNO TANKS 2Q6,~ SAN OZEGQ RI$S~ON VALLEY HILTON HOTEL RESERVATIONS OV[-~LAP l~o~2b ~10.71 IZ6Z~o I~6ZZ7 44.~m lZ6Z3l 112.13 12623Z 30.00 120233 300.00 126Z3~ X~6235 X,2J2.0S XZ6ZJ6 16X.74 12623T Z,B56.OS 126238 2X0.60 126239 JO.00 XZ6Z40 ~Z6Z4Z S6.60 126243 7.43 126244 125.10 IZ6Z&S Z,I89.TO 12624~ 517095 126247 446.9~ 126~8 64,3S6.5~ 126Z49 163.82 IZ6~O 5.8Z IZ6ZSI 1t111.28 1262S2 224021 126253 4M034 ~26ZS4 IZ6ZSS 393.44 IZ6ZS6 2 lZB~ST S6.06 IZ6ZSI 5S4.~0 Z262S9 5.00 126~0 390s0 lZ6Z61 SS.24 126~Z 38S.38 126263 137.45 12 6 Z64 103.30 IZ6~ 100.00 1a6~6 ~2,6~4.06 1Z6~68 TS4. ll 1~6~69 33,419.T0 IZ6~70 IZ6~I 126272 538.49 CITY OF RANCHO) CUCA#ONGA LIST OF IlARRANTS FOR PERIODS 04-01098 (97/90) RUN OATEs 04/01/98 VENUOR NA#E XTEH OESCRXPTION ¥ARR NO NARKo A#T. 8· CHECKI OVERLAP 10640 SAYt JOE/CREATIVE 9UILDZ#G PENNIT OEPOSIT REFUNO ~26175 500°00 IIOS SEAL PIJ~NITURE t SVSTEHS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 12627* 366035 ]896 SENECFIALt CAL INSTRUCTOR PAY#ENT e 126275 IME.00 3276 SINCLAIR PAINT HAI#TEhANCE SUPPLIES 126276 692 SIR SPEEDY FAXES 126277 $0641 SHITFIt HEAT.£R R. REFUNO PARKING CITATION XZ6ZTI 30.00 319 SO CALXF GAS CO. HOkTHLT GAS JILLS # I26Z79 ~,913.16 135 $0 CALZF HUNXCXPAL ATHLETIC FEO0ZNC REGISTRATION 126280 100oO0 135 SO CALZF HbNICXPAL ATHLETIC FED, INC REGISTRATION · ~262BZ ~0000 ~572 SOCCER CENTER CO#N $VCS SUPPLIES I ~262e2 S369 $OFT¥AAE HOUSE SUPPLIES J 126ZI3 J14. S9 ((( 116204 - ZZ621S 1432 SOUTHERN CAL~FOR#IA EDISON HONTHLV ELECTRIC BILLS t 126286 S739 STANTON TROPHY TROPHY SUPPLIES ZZ6ZBT 5465 STO#t~ IDA RECREATION ENTERTAINHINT IZ6Zii 2~44 TARGET YOUTH PROGRA# & DAY CARP SUPPL e 1262B9 90°02 U36 TARGET SPECIALTY PROOUCTS IMXNT SUPPLIES I ~261~0 S731 TKO SOFTHARE SOPT¥ARE & SUPPLIES 126191 814000 473e TRINITY ENTERPRISES SUPPLIES · XZ6Z~Z 449.11 ]0642 TvENTX~THC20T.) CENTURY POX FZLH PARTIAL REFUND PIL#ING FEES e X261~3 J4)T UNXFXRST UkXFORH SERVICE UNXPOR# SERVICES · 126294 112.00 4~06 U#XOUE CREATIONS 1ST AID KITS ~Z6ZES 91.06 STX8 UNXTEO CALXPOR~LA F4CTORS SERVICE ANO S~PLZES d X26296 1,636.6S ZZZ6 UNXT~U PARCEL SERVXC~ UPS SE~VZC~ g X26~7 86.00 ~0140 VAN KOOTEN~ CfiEKlE O.A.R.E. CONFEREKE 126298 SO.00 3422 VIKING OFFICE P~OO~TS OFfiCE SUPPLIES J lZ6~* 332.75 499 VISION SE*VZLE PLAN - (CA) HOkTHLY VZSZON sERvice IZLLZNG :16~0 8,64e. ZZ 478 WAR~EN L CO., CARL LIABILITY CLAXNS · 126Mi 900.56 10643 uEXSSKE~, XN~., HERMAN PeaNIT OePOSIT REPUNO IZiM4 A,000.00 ~0643 M~XSSKERe INC., FIEfNAN P~tAXT DE~SZT REPRO ZZ6MS BOOB00 4577 UELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES Z26M6 AB~05.77 675 MVNN'S PROST~KP/HAXAZR VEHICLE HAZNT SUPPLIES lZ6~l 52050 509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY HACHZNE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 126~9 37& ZEE NEOXCAL SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES 126310 30033 10645 ZZNZ, NEOXCAL CLXNZC~ GXL6ERT Y BUSINESS LICENSE REPUNOS 126311 12.50 TOTAL PO~T]aO~,TO MASTER ~L114qA.R¥ b~.~C:H 3~, ~e CASH AVI~AGE ---YIELD TO MATURITY--- PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYS TO 360 365 I NV~STM~%~S -,., 9OOK VALUE ~ORTFOLIO TERM M~TUR ITY EQUIVA/~NT EQUIVALENT Cert£~Xca:ae of Deposit - Bacdc ............... $ 10,925,532.20 13.53 416 180 S.900 $.980 I,oca]. Ag~cy ~nvesCu~nc Fundo ................ $ 12,62s,6ol. Ol ~$.70 ~ 1 5.642 S.720 Federal Ag~c~ IOIUOI - CoU~Cl~ ............... $ S6,394,531.2S 70.47 1,693 1,318 6.331 6.426 Mox~gage Bickod Sec~ciCiel ................... $ 179,936.4S 0.23 &,$25 2,433 8.906 9.03Q .............................................................................. TOTAL ~S a~dAV~J~A~B~ ............. $ 60,024,601.71 100.00% 1,264 960 ·.161% 6.2%7, CASH Paii~Check:Llag Acc~tl ................... $ 1,207,746.74 1.973 2.000 (n(~ includem I. Accrued T',.,tereit TOTAL CASH and P~CHA~B Ilv~-]mw.~ST ............. $ 1,215,49S.69 TOTAL CASH ~ ~S ................. $ 61,240,097.S0 1411T!I BI)ZIIO IFZIC~G, ~ BiJu4r331Gl 14iLIK] 31 Fl&l T0 DS31 CU.Tr,m~ Te~z $ 41.2, S'73..2S $ 3,447,200.34 AVeBArB DAILY !!ALfdlCll mi, w__&Avm IATB OF ~ $ 80,373,092.25 $ 74,363,3*4·. 2'7 ·. 04% ·. 1'21 im in ccufoz~L~y vl~h the ~voot~m~ policy adc~od AugG~ .20, 1997. A cc~y o£ The Izreeet~e~ 1~ her~in ~ pzz~vid~e euffici,m* cash £1~w licIuid/t~f to M~t the next lax ~t]~ eeti~atud e~peod/turee. The ~c~t~-eod market va/uex w~re obta/ned frc~ (IDC)-Lnteractive Data ¢owporat~ prici~j eerv~¢e. /1 06/08/1990 ¢ZTY OP RAJ~HO Ct~CAJqONOA ~i - 3 ~NVI~TMERT POH~'POLIO DETAI~q - [NVgL'TM~ITS MARC}{ 3~, ~998 CASH [NVESTM~qT AV]~a~AGg pURChASE STA~KD --- YTM --- MATURITY DAYS NUMBER ISSUER BAIA.NC~ DATE BOOK VA/ut~ FAC~ VALU~ MAJ~T-~'T VA/,U~ RA~ 360 355 DATE TO MAT ~.Mac~-~FZCAT~--~ OF DB3K)SlT - BA~K 01013 CZT~Z~qS BOS~IB~8 BAHK 03/10/90 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 S.500 S.S00 S.S76 03/10/99 O0975 ~ OS/22/91 1,500,000.00 1,SO0,000.00 1,S00,000.00 i.000 &.000 i.013 05/3i/91 SS 00950 8AMI(~ 04/29/9? 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 6.240 6.240 6.22? 04/39/91 21 00990 SAHM~ 00/06/97 1,515,000.00 X,SiS, 000.00 1,515,000.00 S.000 S.000 S.101 01/0i/91 127 01013 SAiNM~ 03/05/91 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 5.500 S.500 S.57& 02/09/99 342 11014 SA]4M/L 02/li/91 1,110,532.30 1,110,533.20 1,010,522.30 S.400 S.400 S.475 03/1S/99 249 SUB'L'~C)TAL8 adE2d AY'~gPJLC~B~ 9,728,750.01 10,035,532.20 10,825,532.20 10,835,532.20 S.lO0 S.880 180 LOC::&L ~ 32n,'ZrTJ4B~ ~ LOC2.LAC3~iCY ~ ~ Z&)CiU.,Jt~IC~ ~ M]BI) 8~BTOTJkL~ AI~IAV~]~R~I 12,999,795.3& 12,625,101.01 12,i25,601.01 12,t25,601.01 5~720 S.'42 S.720 1 0.00 0.00 0.H S.707 S.125 5.707 1 12,625,&01.11 12,&25,601.01 12,625,601.81 5.642 S.720 I 00567 00960 00554 0059S 0X000 01007 ~ ~ M NCJRTG. CO 0]/0i/N ~if- ~ Z~&11MI::~I~43. CO 06/35/97 FJI~JALHONBZ&)AWNCJ2'G. CO ol/3o/57 l~:11tALW:08 LO&lINOIT~. CO 03/02/91 2,000,0'00.00 3,004,0OO.00 1,~e, 635.04 6.030 6.030 6.114 01/16/0X 1,~ ~,~,OH.H 3,~,HO.N 3,031,~.N 6.fiO 4.620 6.~ 03/37/03 X,~,3~.N Z,I,i.H 3,034,3~.~ 6.34~ 6.34T 6.334 0T/X~/0Z 1,9fi,0OO.00 2,000,000.00 1,995,0H.00 6.3~ 6.422 6.511 10/32/01 1,300 1,0~,~.00 1,0H,~.00 1,001,~.~ 6.330 6.330 6.418 01/07/03 3,0~,~.~ 3,~,~.H I,~,TM.~ 6.330 6.330 i.30& 01/01/03 3,~,HO.M 3,~,~.H 3,4~,M.~1 4.14~ 6.0~ 6.140 03/05/03 1,7~1 ~2,968.?S 1,0~,0~.00 9~,1~.~ 5.240 T.030 T.X2T 11/30/~ 243 ~,3~.H 1,H0,000.00 I,M,~T.H S.II0 6.0~ i.13? 03/19/99 352 X,~,~.O0 ~,000,~.00 X,00~.M T.0~S T.035 T.X]J 0S/21/01 X,14& 1,M,O~.N 1,0N,~.~ 9N, T~.N 6.1~ 6.195 6.3~1 ~/30/00 021 3,~0,0~.00 2,000,000.00 3,015,42~.H 6.~0 6.~0 6.631 04/02/01 1,09T 1,0~,3~.~ 1,Q00,000.O0 1,000,635.00 6.511 6.SO0 6.5~ 04/~1/99 385 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,004,063.SO S.~4 6.~4 6.635 07/30/02 1,581 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.OO 993,12~.00 6.230 6.230 6.317 01/06/03 1,741 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 ~96,~3.~ 6.110 6.110 &.195 12/29/01 1,367 ~,500,000.00 2,SOQ, 000.OO 2,471,~S.00 6.100 6.100 6.185 03/27/02 1,421 1,991,750.00 2,000,000.00 1,900,125.00 5.990 6.O0S 6.081 03/06/01 1,070 1,~5,3~2.50 2,000,000.00 1,~0,000.00 5.695 5.867 S.949 02/1~/01 ~,052 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,033,7~.00 6.&30 6.628 6.720 0~/24/02 1,000,000.00 ~,000,0~.00 1,000,~T.~ 6.4~ S.%S0 6.~0 06/30/00 821 2,000,0~.00 3,000,000.~ 2,0XS,0~.~ 6.320 i.220 6.400 10/22/02 1,665 0&/01/199g CITY OF RANCHO CUC. AJ40NGA PI4 - INVESTMenT PORTPOLIO DETAILS - ~ CITY MARCH 31, 1998 CASH INVeSTMeNT AVERAGE PL~RC}{ASE STATED - - - Y-r~4 - - ~ MATI/RITY I~AYS NUMBE~ ISSU]~R BALANCE DATE BOOK VALLrE FACE VALUE MAR/C]~T VAiJ3~ RATE 360 365 DATE T~ MAT 01009 P'~)~LILT~HOliB?.1,0AZiHOR"l'G. CO 02/18/9~ 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,982,S00.00 ~.~0 ~.160 6.246 0~/~8/0~ 1,?14 01010 ~~ ~~. ~ 02/19/98 ~,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 990,&21.00 ~.1~5 6.~35 ~.220 02/~/03 1,~81 00~7 ~~ ~ 05/0l/~S X, S00,000.00 X,500,000.00 X,SOX,175.00 7.270 7.~70 7.)7~ 0S/01/00 7S1 00~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~$/2~/91 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,~95,~25.0Q ~.230 ~.230 6.317 11/29/01 1,331 00~e4 ~~ ~ ~ ~2/12/9~ ~,~80,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,992,500.00 S.1~0 ~.378 ~.41~ 12/14/01 1,]52 00~92 ~ ~ ~ ~ 05/05/97 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,043,710.00 7.070 7.0~0 7.~1 OS/01/02 1,4~ 01001 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0~/2~/98 3,~9~,121.00 (,000,000.00 3,970,000.00 6.150 6.~61 6.247 01/27/02 1,762 ........................................................... 56,500,000.00 &.331 i.4~i ~ B&c,.aJ~ ,SBCO'RXTZ'BS ~ ~ ~ ~. GO 03/;23/17 00'203 ~ I~TIC~ HC)/~G k 06/2:3/01 GO~'~i,~'Z' IGTZC~GL H0X'TG A OS/23/86 ~ aZid AVB]iA,(~I 100,23t.00 31,B16.S4 32,464.69 23,374.47 1.000 8.334 1.612 01/01/03 1,371 66,370.49 71,848.97 70,924.72 8.S0O 9.517 9.689 09/01/10 4,536 59,212.34 59,06&.S.2 45,437.61 I.S00 0.&21 1.740 0S/IS/O~ 1,140 22,4~6.72 22,055.61 2,269.7~ 9.000 8.534 8.652 03/1S/Ol 1,079 .......................................... 170,936.40 141,911.0.2 100,433.79 0.906 9.030 2,633 $ 00,024,601.71 00 0S7,89i S8 79,541,387.13 00,136,767.00 6.161% 6.247% 960 /3 04/0~/~.~90 CTTY OF RA~C'r~O CI;CJa~NGA P!4 - 'l fNV'B. STt'GI:NT PORTpOrTO DETA'~LS - CASH C~TY MARCH 31. 1998 C_A~]~ INV~S'I~MENT AVERAGE PUPCHASE STATED - - - ~ - - - MATU~IT~ DAYS N~/MBE]~ ISSUEI~ RAIJtNC~ DATE BOOK VA/_~ FACE VALGE ~ VALU~ RAT~ 360 365 DATE ~0 MAT ~/SAVXlqc~s ACCOUNTS BA.NKOFAf~i~./C::B, BAI4KOFJ~CA X,207,74&.74 2.000 1.97] 2.000 0.00 2.000 1.975 2.000 811,695.13 1,207,746.74 1.97~ 2.000 7,749.15 $ 1,215,490.89 %~:7~L~ ~ X~PWJ~T)~ET~ $ g0,373,082.25 01,240,097.60 o4/oo/199u CZTY OF RAnChO CU~ PM - PORTFOLIO MASTEI~ IN~TMENT ACTIVXTY BY T~lrE CITY MARCH 1, 1998 - MARCH 31, ~998 C~H STATED TRANSACTION ~C~LA~ES SAL~.S/MATUAITI~S TYPE INV~TM~ # ISS~ RATE DA~-~ OR DE~$ITS OR WIT74DRAWA~ ~ C~Xr&CAT~OF DEPOSIT - ~ 01013 CITIZ~L~ BUSLN~SS BANK 5.500 03/18/1999 2,000,000.00 0098& ~ 5.830 03/05/1998 00999 ~ 5.720 03/1~/1991 01012 ~ 5.500 03/05/1999 1,000,000.00 0~014 S~ 5.400 1,000,000.00 1,910,532.20 81,825, 522.20 4,810,532.20 2,810,532.20 10,826,532.20 r.~ClLLAGmOCr ~ ImmM (Hcut. hly Sumsa.ry) 00o0s LOCAL ~ /:NVST ~ S.720 00004 ~ ~ 31qVST ~ 5.707 2,600,000.00 BBGIl~lIlqG BALA.lqCB: 2,000,000.00 12,025,601.81 2,600,000.00 2,000,000.00 12,625,601.01 2. 000 2, S64,000.0O 2. 000 BBOX3OTI3OG BAXAIEC:B: 1,057, '700.00 S01,.446.7& 2,56&,000.00 1,857,700.00 1,207,746.74 ~ FIdlM C~.~DIT B,~eE B~3~g1'11~3 BALANC~: 6.165 03/05/1998 2,0oo, 000.00 50,394, S31.2,5 56,394, S31.25 00071 ~~ I. dOAJlMOJI:T~. COiI:i~. 0.000 00203 1,'~:~BR&LI4]kTLMTGA~fII 9.S00 00002 C9OViIOO~IT HP~TZOIGLI, MOILP/"GASS~t' 9.500 00069 G~.;V. · H]~"FZ(3I~tL P10rl~ASS31 9.000 Sumz~¥AX.S and ENDI~ 03/ls/90 676.62 03/2s/98 407.om 03/16/~0 1,214.22 o3/o2/~0 55.16 101,37,.~4 0.00 2,443.09 179,936.45 79,928,491.~4 9,974,532.20 8,670,675.29 81,232,340.45 /5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April I5. 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF BALLFIELD LIGHTING FOR ETiWANDA CREEK PARK, TO BE FUNDED FROM PARK DEVELOPMENT FUNDS (FUND 20) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Rancho Cucamonga Construction and Installation of Ballfield Lighting for Etiwanda Creek Park, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids." BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $150,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 21 and April 28, 1998, with the bid opening at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, May 12, 1998.. Respectively submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:sd Attachments A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL%'CIL OF THE CITY OF tLANCHO CUC.&MONGA, CALIFOP~NIA. APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND INST,a~LATION OF BALLFIELD LIGHTING FOR ETIWANDA CREEK PARK WHEKEAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "**" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the 'following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEAI,ED BIDS OR PROPOSAI.S" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 PM on Tuesday, May 12, 1998, sealed bids or proposals for the "Construction and Installation of Ballfield Lighting for Etiwanda Creek Park, in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction and Installation of Ballfield Lighting for Etiwanda Creek Park." - -- PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Pan 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in ~vhich the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to b~ posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00). for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done /7 under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or an.,,' subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or Bo When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C° When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division, of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violatibn of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder wdll enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered fi'om a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or a C-10 license in accordance with the provisions of the Contractors License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 15th day of April 1998 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 15th day of April 1998 ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: APRIL 21 & APRIL 28, 1998 2(3 DATE' TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April,.l.5, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Director Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II ~)9' APPROVAL OF REQUEST FROM MARKS CABLEVISION TO WAIVE CITY FEES FOR THE RANCHO RALLY (MINI GRAND PRIX RACE) TO BE HELD ON JUNE 27, 1998 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve for the second year the waiving of facility rental fees for the Rancho Rally (Mini Grand Prix Race) to be held on June 27, 1998. This is a fundraising event to benefit the Rancho Cucamonga YMCA. RACKGROLrNI~/ANAI,YSIS: The City has received a request again this year from Ron Stark, representing Marks CableVision, for the City to waive facility rental fees for use of the Epicenter Expanded Parking Lot on June 27, 1998, for their Rancho Rally fundraiser. The Rancho Rally is a community fundraiser for the YMCA. USA/M-Car promotes these types of events as fundraisers in cities throughout the country. The YMCA is an important community non-profit organization which provides much needed youth programs for the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. FISCAl. IMPACT: Ron Stark has indicated that Marks CableVision will provide to the City a $3,000 credit for advertising and promoting City programs on their major cable networks in exchange for the City's waiving the facility rental fee. R¢/spectfully subm~ed, ?erry ~mwood Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Director JF/PP/mev Attachment £/ CableVision March 30, 1998 Paula Pachon Management Analyst II Community Services Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Paula: Thank you for your assistance and guidance for our use of the Epicenter parking lot for the Rancho Rally to benefit the Rancho Cucamonga Family YMCA. As we did last year, we would like to use the parking area without a cash outlay so more dollars can go to the YMCA. I realize that the parking lot has a real value and that the City would normally charge around $3,000. I would as we did last year suggest a trade arrangement. We would give you (the City) $3,000 in cable advertising. You could use this advertising to promote your city events, Art in the Park, or any Concerts you may be planning, etc. Your advertisements will be shown on our major cable networks like CNN, ESPN, USA, Lifetime, Discovery, Nickelodeon and others. As each event approached I would help you create an advertising schedule that would meet that specific event's needs. Your $3,000 would act as a credit on our books to use at your discretion. This way the City still receives value for the Epicenter parking lot, you receive additional promotion for your ~vents, the YMCA gets to keep more of the money that is raised and Marks continues to support city events...everyone wins! docs/adsales/mcrcity. sam As discussed we would like to use the Epicenter's back parking area on Saturday, June 27. We would need to go in sometime the previous evening for about 4 hours of setup. I understand that your Friday event may be ending early that evening and we will be ha'i~py to wait until that event is completely wrapped up before we begin set-up. These sanctioned races are becoming very popular. The City of San Bernardino is this year hosting two events. M-Car races are also held in Riverside, Ternecula, Redlands, Victorville, Hemet, Palm Desert and other cites throughout Southern California and the Nation. Our goal is to raise between $5,000 and $10,000 for the YMCA, to bring a unique event to our city and to have some fun! Sincerely, Ron Stark Director of Advertising and New Business Development docs/adsales/mcrcity. sam CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAFE: TO: .\pril 15. 1 Mayor and Members of the City Council, FROM: BY: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Director Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II ~)q/ SUBJECT: APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR A CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF AGING GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $3.000 FOR SENIOR CITIZEN OUTREACH SERVICES (FY 1997-98) R!z, COMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $3,000 for fiscal year 1997/1998 for a California Department of Aging Grant with the San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services is the Area Agency which assists with the allocation of senior citizen program grants from the California Department of Aging. On April 7, 1997, the Community Services Department submitted a grant application to the County Department of Aging and Adult Services to provide a comprehensive marketing and promotional program for senior residents. The focus will be to promote the many programs and activities provided at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and outreach would include marketing to the minority senior citizen population of the City. Specific deliverables for this grant include: (1) Development of a Senior Center brochure describing the services, programs, classes and events that take place at the Center. (2) Translation of Center publications into Spanish to use to market the facility to minority senior citizens of the city. Examples of specific publications include The Silver Fox, the Community Resource Directory and the Senior Center brochure. FISCAl, IMPACT: The grant is in the amount of $3,000 for fiscal year 199%98. An in-kind match of $333.00 will be provided by the City in the form of office supplies and advertising expenses which have been budgeted in the Department's 1997-98 Annual Budget. R~esp~ submine& Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Director JF/PP/pp Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FISCAL YEAR 1998199 ANNUAL BUDGET SUMMARY DEPARTMENT: Community Services DrV1SlON: Senior Outreach Program Grant FUND; 132 COST CENTER: 4532 OBJECT # PFRSONNFL 1100 Regular Salarla~ 1300 Part time Salaries 19(X) Fringe Benefits 1996197 Adopted Budget 0 0 0 APPROPRIATION DETAIL Fiscal Year 1997/98 Adopted Estimated cudget 6/30/98 Fiscal Year 1998/99 Dept Manager Request Rcmd 0 0 0 0 0 2,940 0 0 0 60 0 0 OPf=RATIONS $100 Travel & MeeUn~ 3300 Mileage 3900 Mltntemnce & (~T. 6028 Contract ~ Personnel Tot~ 0 0 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CAPITA; OUT! AY Operations Totnl: 0 C,~oit=l Out~y To=l: Department Total: , 0 0 0 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 15, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer John Martin, Associate Engineer APPROPRIATION AND PURCHASE OF BALLFIELD LIGHT POLES FOR THE ETIWANDA CREEK PARK FACILITY AND APPROPRIATION OF $32,500 FROM PARK DEVELOPMENT FUNDS (FUND 20) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of ballfield poles from Whitco Pole manufacturer for $32,500 from Park Development funds (Fund 20) and allow appropriation therefore. BACKGROUND/ANAI,YSIS The purpose of this purchase ahead of a consU~ction contract is to insure the availability of the poles. Normal manufacturing and delivery of such poles can mice as long as 12 weeks. Therefore, staff obtained specifications, as a first order of the design phase, from the consultant designer, Dream Engineering. With the assistance of the Dream Engineering, pole manufacturers were solicited to find one who could meet the City's design standards and our pressing time schedule. The firm of Whitco Pole Company was the most responsive to our requests for price and delivery time. Whitco has indicated they can deliver the poles within a six-week time frame. Other proposals delivery times were unacceptable to the City's needs. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JM:sd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 15. 1998 Mayor ani[Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY'S (SCRRA) FUNDING APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL METROLINK RAIL CARS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a resolution supporting Southern California Regional Rail Authority's (SCRRA) funding application for additional Metrolink rail cars. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In January of this year, SCRRA requested local cities and agencies to support their request for $50 million over the six-year State Transportation Improvement Program cycle under Senate Bill 45 for additional Metrolink rail cars. The request did not elicit much support from local agencies since they felt it might conflict with locally-preferred projects. One of our City's most critical projects in rail transit is expansion of our Metrolink station platforms and parking lot. Critical street projects are the widening of Haven Avenue from Base Line Road to the Route 30 Freeway and the Carnelian Street Improvements from San Bernardino Road to Base Line Road. However, in March local agencies were informed that a successful application from the SB45 program by Metrolink for additional rail cars would not compete with local street projects since SCRRA's rail procurement project was placed in an Intercity Rail funding pot. Also, our City's expansion of the Metrolink Station will not compete with Intercity Rail projects since in the Inland Empire Metrolink is considered commuter rail, and commuter rail proje. c_~ do not compete against Intercity Rail projects in the SB45 program. Attached are letters of support to Mr. Robert Wolf, Chairman California Transportation Commission, and Mr. James Van Loben Sels, Office of the Director, Cattrans. The resolution supporting SCRRA's application can be attached to the letters. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MO:sd Attachments April 16. 1998 C C Mr. James Van Loben Sels Office of the Director Caltrans 1120 N. Street, Room MS-49 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Mr. Van Loben Sels: Our partnership with SCRRA and SANBAG in providing an efficient and alternate mode of transportation through Metrolink has been a huge success in our City. In providing a convenient means of transportation for residents in our community Metrolink has contributed to improved air quality and reduced gridlock. Since construction of the station was completed in 1994, ridership via Metrolink has increased dramatically, even to the extent of over-filling the parking lot at the station. Because of the increasing demand for ridership on Metrolink trains, our City Council strongly supports SCRRA's funding application for additional railcars from Intercity Rail funds under the SB45 program. Enclosed is a resolution supporting your application. Sincerely, William J. Alexander Mayor WJA:sd Enclosures N. King, Exec. Director. SANBAG M. Bair, SANBAG R. Nolan, SCRRA Boardmember R. Stanger, Exec. Director, SCRRA A. Clifford, SCRRA C Mr. Robert Wolf, Chairman California Transportation Commission 1120 N. Street, Room MS-52 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Mr. Wolf: Our partnership with SCRRA and SANBAG in providing an efficient and alternate mode of transportation through Metrolink has been a huge success in our City. In providing a convenient means of transportation for residents in our community Metrolink has contributed to improved air quality and reduced gridlock. Since construction of the station was completed in 1994, ridership via Metrolink has increased dramatically, even to the extent of over-filling the parking lot at the station. Because of the increasing demand for ridership on Metrolink trains, our City Council strongly supports SCRRA's funding application for additional railcars from Intercity Rail funds under the SB45 program. Enclosed is a resolution supporting your application. Sincerely, William J. Alexander Mayor WJA:sd Enclosures cc: N. King, Exec. Director. SANBAG M. Bair, SANBAG R. Nolan, SCRRA Boardmember R. Stanger, Exec. Director, SCRRA A. Clifford, SCRRA A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TT COL%'CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.X.XlONG:'~. CALIFORNIA. SUPPORTING SOUT-kIERN CALIF01LNIA REGIONAL [L-kIL AUTHOPdTY'S (SCRRA) FUNDING APPLICATION FOR ADDITIONAL METROLINK RAIL CARS WHEREAS, Metrolink, the passenger rail system operated by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority, began operation on October 26, 1992, with 24 daily trains serving I1 stations on three lines; WHEREAS, Metrolink has added on average a new train station and 10-miles of railroad line every two months of its existence and today carries over 27,000 riders between 46 stations along 416 miles of track in the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bemardino, Ventura, and San Diego; WHEREAS, Metrolink provides a convenient means of transportation for residents throughout the region, reduces gridlock, improves air quality; WHEREAS, Metrolink removes more than 15,250 automobile trips per day and removes 8.5 percent of freeway traffic on parallel highways; WHEREAS, additional funding is necessary to continue the rapid expansion of the system to meet the needs of current and future passengers; WHEREAS, the Senate of the State of California passed Senate Bill 45 in 1997 restructuring the funding of transportation projects and creating various funding programs; and WHEREAS, Metrolink is asldng that a request for funding of the purchase of 30 additional commuter passenger cars and five locomotives be considered eligible for funding from the Intercity Rail Program. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga supports this request by Metrolink to consider additional commuter passenger cars and locomotives be eligible for funding from the Intercity Rail program. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAVE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 4.5. 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Jerry Fulwood, Acting Community Services Director Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II ~a~ APPROVAL OF CITY CO-SPONSORSHIP OF TI-1E INI,AND VAI,I,EY DAI1,Y BUI ,I,ETIN Al,1 ,-STAR GAMES ON JUNE 9. 1998 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the City's co-sponsorship of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All-Stax Games on June 9, 1998. The City has co-sponsored the All-Stax Game tbr the past four (4) years with the Daily Bulletin and Valley Baseball Club. As a City co-sponsored benefit, the rental fee would not be assessed and the City would provide maintenance staff and facility support for a practice game as well as the event game as is normally provided on Quakes baseball days. BACKGROUNr~/ANAI ,YSlS The City has received a request from the Valley Baseball Club and the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin to co-sponsor the High School All Star Crame on June 9, 1998. ~ would be a fund-raising benefit for the Bulletin's "Send an Underprivileged Kid to Camp" Program. R~spectfully submitted, ~/erry Fulwood, Acting Community Services Director JF/PP/mev Attachment 1998 All-Star High School Baseball Game Proposal: A collaborative agreement between Quakes Baseball, Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and the City of Rancho Cucarnonga to provide'a~ Inland Valley All-Star High School Baseball Game. Date/Time: Game to be held on Tuesday, June 9, 1998 Gates Open at 5:30, First pitch at 6:30 Ticket Sales: Ticket prices will be $3.00 for green box seats (reserved). $2.00 for red seats and bleacher (festival seating). A Special "two for one" coupon offer on general admission tickets a~ivance sales will be made available to make the event affordable for all. Net proceeds from the game to go to the Daily Bulletin Send a Kid to Camp Fund. General Site: Only Main Gate to be open for admission. Players, staff and VIP to park in Lot A Quakes dugout to be North Team. Visiting lockerroom to be South Team Limited concessionaire opening on the Concour~ Terrace Seats to be closed unless ticket sales warnrot opening. Schools will be: Ambassador Christian Fontana Ayala Fontaria A.B. MiUer Bonita C_mnm~ Boys R~public Oas~ Calvary Baptist La V~n~ Luth~m Chaffcy Montelair Chino Ontm'io Claremont Ontario-Christian Damien Pomona Diamond Bar Rancho Cucamonga Don Lu~o Rialto Eisenhower San Dimas Upland Webb Glendom Teams will be on a North South split with 1-10 being the dividing line. Some adjustments may need to be made to make teams even in terms of enrollment. Inland Valley Daily Bulletin will provide: * Player liability release * Electronic md print media notification. * Selection process for the 46 players and 12 coaches. (Joint Sponsors to be notified of selection meeting.) * Four Umpires * Um'ese~ed ticket sales at Daily Bulletin Lobby. * A special print section published prior to the game. ja "Player Recognition Package for each player and coach. Package will include, hat, commemorative ball, certificate and photo card. * Reception for the players, their parents, and coaches and sponsors. * In paper adverusing to promote the event lappfox. value $7,000.) * An adveruser sponsored game program. daily paper, All Star commemorative section to be sold at the game, proceeds to benefit Send A Kid fo Camp program. * Print unrese~,ed tickets for the game with one advertiser on the back. * Provide for On Site Paramedic Staffing * Provide for player, Event Staff and VIP parking pass and signage. * Name recognition of all collaborating parmen on pnnted mareaais and introduction of the sponsors the night of the game. * Credentials -photo and press. * Pre-game and post-game coverage of the event. Quakes Baseball will provide: * Announcing Booth ~ announcer for the game, including boant operator. * Red seats for visiting baseball scouts (not to e*___,~d__ 30). * Two sky boxes for the use by the Daily Bulletin. * Press Box. * Open concession s~mds and Quakes Gift Shop during the game (no liquor sales),. * Appearance of Tremor mcl Aftershock. * Promotion of ticket sales. * Ticket sales through Quakes Ticket Office for reserved green seats * Two way radios for field to stadium staff communication. * National Anthem Singer. * Ushers, ticket rakers and game d~y personnel. * Two ~ Coolers, cups ard ice. * Post g~me refi~hu,calz sod~'s md hot do~/plv,~ f~ play~s ~l eo~d~ following tim game. * Provid~ full accounting for ticket sales with ch~k in the amount of th~ ticket sales. Request of the city of Rancho Cucamonga: * Waive fees for the use of stadium and parking a~a on Jui~ 8 pfagtic~ & $U!~ 9, 1998 game. Ticket sales to be confirmed with the city one week prior to game. If advance sales exceed 5,000 in number, parking will b~ paid by the Daily Bulletin in an amount not to ena~ $3,000. * Provide stadium for player Inclice on Monday, June 8. * Visitor Locker Room for the game. * Arrang~ for security at th~ stadium on game night. * Mainfinance ~ clean-up of th~ stadium. · Quakes Baseball Date Collaboration proposal accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Date City of Rancho Cucamonga CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE' ,April 15, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Citiy Manager FROM: BY: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II ~¥ SUBJECT: Approval of Contract for Display of Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the contract for the display of the Viemain Memorial Moving Wall to be display in Rancho Cucamonga on October 23- 29, 1998. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As Council is aware, the Veteran of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 8680 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga submitted an application to bring the Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall to the City of Rancho Cucamonga back in 1996. Staff and the VFW have been working to secure a date for this profoundly moving exhibit to be displayed in our community. We are pleased to inform the Council that staff has recently been notified that Rancho Cucamonga has been scheduled to display the moving wall between October 23-29, 1998. The Memorial is made up of many panels which vary in height from three feet to six feet. Each panel weight approximately 40-48 pounds. The wall pieces are fit into a 'U' frame and then are staked to the ground. The minimum area required for the wall structure is 220 feet by 64 feet. The Epicenter soccer fields have been identified as an ideal location for the display of the Memorial due to the abundance of parldng available at the site and the size of the fields. Community Services and Engineering staff and the VFW Post 8680 are working together to coordinate the display of the Memorial in our community. It is estimated that expenses for this event will total approximately $8,000. Staff has included this event and its associated expenses as part of the Community Services Department's budget request for fiscal year 1998/1999. R/espectfully su~ni~e~ ~ ¥Jerry Fulwood Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Director JF/PP/pp Attachment . ,GREE. !ENT Thts AGR, EE,~[E'NT ~s entered into on the date stgned by the last of the parties as md~cated below, by and between City, Of Rancho Cucamonga: V.F.W Post 8680 (hereinafter, the SPONSOR I. located at Rancho Cucamonga, California and Vietnam Combat Veterans, Ltd. {,hereinafter, the VETERANS), located at San Jose, California. WITNESSETH WHERE.4S, the VETERANS have the right to display the l/2-scale replica of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial known as the Moving Wall (hereinafter, the MEMORIAL) in various cities throughout the continental United States, its Territories and Possessions, or in sub-divisions thereof, or in any foreign country expressing a desire to display the MEMORIAL; and WHEREAS, the SPONSOR has expressed a desire to display the MEMORIAL in Rancho Cucamonga, Califorma; NOSE, 171EREFORE, the VETERANS and the SPONSOR hereby agree as follows: 1. The SPONSOR agre~ to display the MEMORIAL for a period of seven (7) days, x ........beginning on October 23 1998 and concluding on Oetot~r 29 1998 under the following conditiom: ao An area raea,,mring 26011 X 65ft is the minimum area for the MEMORIAL structure. This does not include area needed for ceremonies or for persons visiting the MEMORIAL. b. To provide volunteers to assist in erecting the MEMORLJLL at the display site. A minimum of e~ght t8) volunteers is needed. c. To provide as many volunteers as necessary to assist those viewing the MEMORIAL in locating names for a 24 hour period each day of the display. do To provide adequate security of the MEMORIAL display in the form of on- site security personnel or by providing the volunteers with a means of communications with local law enforcement and first-aid personnel. '~"':"~ R~AL under the ~'ollo~.,,~n~2t~rms By prov~din~ one (1) individual to accompany th~ ~MO~ and to &rect and asslst volunte~rs m thc assembly of the ~MOR~ at the display b. By providing at least two (2) copies of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Directory of Names to use at the display site for entire duration of display c. By providing assistance to volunteers'in answenng questions. d. By maintaining the general appearance of the MEMC~dAL throughout the display period. By keeping an accurate and daily account of the donation box provided by the VETERANS for any and all contributions people may wish to make towards the continued upkeep and maintenance of the MEMORIAL and of articles left at the MEMORIAL by the public. 3. In consideration tot the MEMORIAL display the SPONSOR hereby a&rees to the following: a. To pay the VETERANS the sum of $2,650.00 for a display period of Seven (7) days. bo To provide adequate and co~o~le hoeel acoomn'oa-tions for one (1) rc~es.~tative of the VETERANS for nine nigh~ beginning October 24, 1998 through November 1, 1998.. To a~ran~ and provide meals for one (1) ~po_s=atative of the VETERANS for the period of October 25, 1998 through November 1, 19~8. 1) In lieu of providing meals, the SPONSOR may pay the VETERANS the sum of thirty dollars ($30.00) per day for meal expenses; or S240 for eight (8) days. 2) By their initials here, the SPONSOR will: Arrange meals or Pay Per Diem d. The SPONSOR further agrees to neither solicit nor seek contributions for any reason, nor to sell any items, at or within 100 yards of the MEMORIAL site. a. T~e VETEFL~NS agree to ~ndemm~, defend and hold harmless the SPONSOR, its directors, officers, employees, agents, and contributors t'rom any loss, injury or damage to the MEMORIAL or to the VETERANS' representative arising out of or in connection with the display of said MEMORIAL. The SPONSOR agrees to defend and hold harmless the VETERANS, its directors, officers, employees, agents,'members and contributors from any loss, injury or damages arising from any circumstances which would prevent the display of said MEMORIAL as stated elsewhere in this agreement. It is understood by both parties to this agreement that any and all items (i.e., letters, notes, medals, photos, poems, etc.) lef~ at the MEMORIAL by persons viewing the MEMORIAL are not souvenirs of the MEMORIAL display. a. All items, except live flowers and plants, will be boxed and marked prior to disassembly of' the MEMORIAL, and will be shipped by the VETERANS rc~s~tative to the VETERANS office in San Jose, California. X ....Please note change in DATES as perour telephone conversation, R.A. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto, by their signature, have executed this a~reement on the date indicat~ by each name, and by both parties as a binding contract, on the latter of the two dates. DATE: By: Title: City Of Rancho Cucamonga V.F.W. Post 8680 P O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 DATE: By: Title: Vietnam Combat Veterans, Ltd. Chairman. Memorial Fund 1267 Alma Court San Jose, California 95112-5943 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 15, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engineer/.~ RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 148 32 85 1N THE AMOUNT OF $30,000.00, FOR CUP 93-46, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD . RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond Number 148 32 85 in the amount of $30,000.00,/br CUP 93-46. located on the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: Arturo L. Flores 3762 Henderson Place Claremont, CA 91711 - - Respectfully submitted, William J. 0'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is CITY OF RAzNCHO CUC,&MONGA STAFF REPORT I)ATE: TO: April 15. 10oS Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain. City Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engineer~/:~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND. AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 96-06. LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF CARNELIAN RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements tbr MDR 96-06. have been completed in.an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of MDR 96-06. located at the south side of Base Line Road, west of Carnelian, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. It is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds. Developer: Bandy/Shryer 20709 Golden Springs Drive, Suite I01 Diamond Bar, CA 91789-3847 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 184 54 25 $5.600.00 William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is A RESC)LL'FION OF 'FHE CITY OF ~ANCIqO CL'CAXIONGA. ('ALIF()I~NI:\. ACCEPTING T~tE PL~-~LIC INIPROVEMENTS FOR. *IDR g6-06. AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS. the construction of public improvements for MDR 96-06 have been completed to the satislr~.ction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS. a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE. be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ()!~DINANCE NO. 328B XN ORDIN ~.NCE ()F ¥t!1.~ ( 11'~,' ('()['N('IL OF THE CITY OF IL~.5~.;1tO CUCAMON(;A REPEALING CHAPTER 3.08 OF lilLE 3 OF CHAPTER 3.08 THERETO, AND REVISING THE CITY'S PURCHASING SYSTEM The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 3.08 of Title 3 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code hereby is repealed, provided. however, that such repeal shall not affect in any manner any purchases initiated prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 2. A new Chapter 3.08 hereby is added to Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: Sections: 3.08.010 3.08.020 3.08.030 3.08.040 3.08.050 3.08.060 3.07.070 3.08.080 3.08.090 3.08.100 3.08.110 PURCHASING SYSTEM Adoption of purchasing system. Definitions. Centralized purchasing division. Purchasing and Central Services Manager. Purchasing Manager - Powers and duties. Requisitions. Bidding- General/)'. Formal bid procedure. Informal bid procedure. Open market procedure. Bidding for public works projects. q/ 3.08.120 3.0~.13~[ 3.08.140 3.08.150 3.08.160 3.08.010. !, ~pectio, tt, tl te.~'ti,,~,. (~mpctitix c Discretionary approvals. Disposition of surplus supplies and equipment. Recycled product procurement policy. Adoption of purchasing system. A purchasing system hereby is adopted in order to establish efficient procedures for the purchase of supplies, equipment and services; to secure for the City supplies, equipment and services at competitive costs commensurate with quality needed and with due consideration to disposability, to exercise positive financial control over purchases, to clearly define authority for the purchasing function, to assure the quality of purchases, and to buy without favor or prejudice. No conix'act entered into in contravention or violation of this Ordinance shall be enforceable against the City. 3.08.0~0. Definitions. As used in this Chapter, the following words and terms are defined as follows unless the context~indicates that a different meaning is intended: Activity or using agency means any department. agency or other unit of City government which derives its support wholly or in part tYom the City. Local bidder means a person. t~rm. partnership or corporation considered to be a point or' sale within the City pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of California. Low bidder means the person, firm. partnership or corporation submitting the lowest price for the supplies, materials. equipment or services which meet or exceed the specifications. delivery terms and conditions and other requirements included in the invitation to bid. Professional ser~'ices n~c:ms [he ~c~'x ices ~t' attorne,~s. ph,~ sicians, architects, engineers. professional, unique, specialized or technical skill or expeaise, not adaptable to competitive bidding, or where the service involves a contract fbr special activities, negotiations tbr the acquisition of l~d, trash se~ices, insurance, bonds or other se~ice of a simil~ nature to the above, engaged for a particular prQect or series of projects: Purchases me~s purchases of supplies, equipment, se~ices ~d porson~ prope~ ~d sh~l not include re~ prope~ le~es, rentals or p~ch~es. Purchasing Manager means the official(s) designated by the CiW M~ager for admins~ation ~or entbrcement or' this Ordin~ce. Purch~S po~cy limi~ me~ such limb w~ch s~l ~ ~ose ~o~m w~ch det~i~e p~c~e proced~es. Such p~ch~e l~i~ s~ ~ e~blish~ by a resolution of ~e CiW Co~cil. Se~ie~ me~ ~y ~d all se~ices, incl~ng, but not limited to, eq~pment se~ice con~. ~e tern does not include se~ices rendered by CiW officem or employees, nor professio~ semces for which the proced~e for pmc~ement is s~ifically provided by law or approved CiW pr~ed~es which are in their nature unique ~d not subject to competitive bidding. Ihis de~tion does not include public ~orks projects - See Section 110 regarding bidding for public works. Supplies and equipment means any and all ~icles, things or personal property ~shed to, or reed by, any City depaament. 3.08.030. Centralized purchasing division. ~ere is created a purchasing division ~'ithin the City which is vested with the authoritv for the centralized purchase of ~upplies. CqL~i, ment and services. 3.08.040. Pttrcha.s'ing and c~'ntrM ~crvice~ manager. The purchasing manager may delegate the duties of that position to subordinate employees. The purchasing manager shall direct and supervise the City's purchasing program. The purchasing manager shall endeavor to obtain as full and open a competition as possible on all purchases. The purchasing manager shall establish methods andprocedures,for the efficient and economical functioning of the purchasing program. " 3.08.050. Purchasing, manager - powers and d,,ties. The purchasing manager shall have the authority to: A. Purchase or contract tbr supplies, materials, equipment and services required by a using department in accordance with the purchasing procedures prescribed by this Chapter. B. Enter into any contract permitted by law, including, but not limited to, equipment service contracts, lease purchase agreements, agreements for services and professional services, and rental agreements subject to any restrictions set forth in this Chapter or specifically provided by law. C. Maintain when feasible full and open competition among bidders on all purchases. D. Prepare, recommend and implement rules governing the purchasing of supplies, equipment and services for the Git5 and recommend revisions and amendments where applicable. E. Keep informed of current developments in the field of purchasing, prices, market conditions and new products. F. Prescribe and maintain such tbrms as are reasonably necesssary to the operation of this Ordinance :red other rules '~lnd reuulations. ~} [.~ccotl~mcnd ~[~c t~'.~t,'t, ,: .t:t'~, ,,~' ~n,~cd supplies and equipment het~cen departments as needed and the sale of all supplies and equipment which c~ot be used by any dep~ment or which become unsuitable tbr City use. H. Maintain a vendor's list. vendor's catalog file ~d records needed for the efficient operation of the purchasing division. I. M~age ~d supe~ise the City cen~ w~eho~ing faciliw. 3.08.060. Re~qsifions. All dep~ents shall submit requests to the pumh~ing m~ger by st~d~d requisition fo~ or by other means as may be established by purchasing proced~es for the supplies, mat~s, ~cm ~d ~ices ~ ~q~ for ~e~ o~mfio~ ~ p~s ~d ~ ~e li~ of ~ appwpda~ ~fo~. ~e p~m8 ~~, ~ ~ng ~y s~h reqffisitions, may q~stion its propde~ ~d may req~e ~om the he~ of ~e requesting dep~ent a j~fi~n of ~ q~fiW or q~iW ~fion~. 3.08.~0. R~di~ - G~e~i~. A. Pm~g of s~[i~ ~d eqffipment s~l ~ by bid pr~ pm~t to S~tions 3.08.080 ~d.3.08.~0 of t~s Chapter. However, bidding may ~ dis~m~ ~ upon adeq~te. specific doc~en~on when one of the tB[lowing conditions exists: 1. ~en, in the view o[the ('in' .~[anager or the person acting in that capacid. an emergency requires that an order be placed with the nearest available source(s) of supply. 2. ~en ~e mo~t involved is less th~ ~e o~n m~et ~o~t esmblish~ by resolution of the City Council. 3. When the commodi~ cctn be obtained.pore only one vendor. A commodi~' ~'hcdl be considered ~;htaim~hh, (,th' ?~'~,~;7 ,~tc vc~ut(;r u'hen m~h' ~me vendor (;~ler.t it tot sale, terms and condtions which reasonably meel the needs O~'the using agency, or when there is a sole distributor or manufacturer of a product or service such that there is no acceptable substitute within a specific geographical area. 4. ~en them is to be a contract for professional se~ices; provided, however, that con~acting for professional se~ices shall be conducted p~t to a request for propos~q~ification proced~e. Awed(s) of professio~ semites con~c~ s~l ~ m~e by the p~ch~ing m~ager when the s~e have been budgeted ~d for which sufficient ~ds have been approp~ated. 5. ~en ~ou~ c~five p~c~g ~ ~e sm~, ~e co~, or o~er public ~encies, ~e Mv~e of l~ge-~e bu~g my ~ ob~. 6. ~en the p~ch~e is benefici~ to ~e ~terest of ~e Ci~ ~d is from a supplier who ~ ~n aw~ded a s~ific item or it~ ~ a con~t ms~g from a fo~ com~ve bid pr~ess by ~o~er gove~en~ agency ~ ~e s~e of C~ifo~a or by ~e fede~ gove~em within the previo~ three-hunted s~-five ~s (one ye~). 7. ~en p~ch~ing from or selling to ~other gove~en~ agency utilizing p~ch~ing ~ments maimained by said govementat agency when such action is beneficial to the interests of the City. 8. ~en the City Council dete~ines by resolmion it would be in ~e best interest of the Ci~ to dispense ~ bidd~g; provided, however, ~at ~e Ci~ Co~cil sh~l state the b~is of its dete~inmion. 9. ~en there is a bre~down in essential machineu, essenti~ se~ices. or when unforeseen circumstances arise includin~ del~x s by contractors. delays in transportation. and immediate service/repair in order to protect public health, safety or welfare. B. Additional Requirements and Prohibitions. 1. Notwithstanding any other term or provision hereof, no contract shall be awarded to any person, firm, partnership or corporation that does not have a City business license when required to possess the same pursuant to any provision of this Code." 2. No person shall be interested personally in any contract made hereunder (See: California Government Code Section 1090, et seq.) or violative of the conflict of interest provisions of the City and/or the Political Re~brm Act (See: California Government Code Section 87100, et seq.). 3. Contracts for services and public works projects less than the minimum amounts for public works bidding (See: California Public Contract Code Section 20160, et seq.) may require the payment of prevailing wages pursuant to the California Labor Code. 4. Bid Splitting. It shall be unlawful to split or separate into smaller units, quantifies, work orders, or projects any purchase of supplies, equipment or services for the purpose of evading the provisions of this Chapter pertaining to the purchase of supplies, equipment or services. Every person who willfully violates this Section is guilty of a misdeameanor. 3.08.080. Formal bid i~rocedure. Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, purchases of supplies, equipment or services of an individual estimated value greater than the established formal bid procedure amount, shall be by written contract with the lowest or highest responsible bidder, as the case 0'7 may be, pursuant to the procedures p~'escr~hcd in this Section. of the ~icle(s) to be purchased or sold. shall state where bid bl~s ~d specifications may be sec~ed, ~d the time ~d place for opening bids. I. Published Notices. Notices inviting bids shall be published at le~t ten (10) days before the date of the opening of the bids. Notices shall be published at le~t once in a newspaper of general circulation. 2. Bidder's List. ~e p~h~mg m~er s~l ~so solicit bi~ from responsible prospective suppliers whose nines ~e on the bidder's list or who have made a ~Ren request that ~eir nines be added to the bidder's list. B. Bidder's S<~W. ~en deem~ n~es~ by ~e pm~Mg ~er, bidder's ~ my ~ p~fi~ in ~e public nofi~ M~ bi~ Bid~ s~ be entitled to re~ of bid sectS; provided, however, that a success~l bidder s~l forfeit ~e bid sec~ty u~n ~ or f~lm to ex~ ~e con~t ~ ~ (10) ~ys ~ ~e notice of awed of~e con~t ~ ~n ~ ~, in ~e laRer evenL ~e CiW is mlely ~mible for ~e delay in ex~mMg ~e con~t. ~e CiW may, on reMs~ or f~lm of~e s~cess~ bidder to execute ~e con~act, aw~ it to ~e next lowest responsible bidder, ruth the bidder's sec~ being applied to the mo~t of~e con~act price differential between the lowest bid ~d the second lowest bid, with ~e s~lm, if ~y, ret~ed to the lowest bidder. If the Ci~ rej<ts the remaining bids presented ~d readve~ises, the mo~t of the lowest bidder's sec~ may be used to offset the cost of receiving new bids ~d the s~lus, if ~y, sh~l ~ reded to the lowest bidder. C. Bid Opening Procedure. Sealed bids shall be submi~ed to the purchasing agent ~d sh~l be identified ~ a bid on the envelope. Bids sh~l be opened in public at the time and place stated in the public notice. :\ t~bulation or'all bids received shall be available tbr pttblic inspection ctttl'ilq~g ~'cu~llar btlsilqcx~, I~, I~',~ utltct' ',l~c bid opening. D. Rejection of Bids. The City may reject any and all bids presented, readvertise for bids or award a contract after negotiation tbr the most reasonable cost under existing conditions. The right to reject any and or all bids is expressly reserved to the City and said decision shall be final. E. Determination of Lowest Responsible Bidder. Upon opening and tabulation of all bids received to determine the low bidder, the purchasing supervisor shall thereafter determine the lowest responsible bidder by applying the following criteria: 1. For purposes of determining the lowest responsible bidder there shall be deducted from the bid(s) submitted by a local bidder all sales taxes which will be apportioned to and received by the City. 2. The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to provide the service or commodity required and to comply with all specified requirements in the bid documem. 3. The bidder's record of performance of previous contracts or services; previous failure to perform to City requirements may disqualify the bidder. 4. The ability of the bidder to provide future maintenance and service for the use of the subject of the contract. 5. Whenever the purchasing manager determines that a bidder is not responsible pursuant to this Section and the specifications of the notice inviting bids, the purchasing manager slaall notify the bidder of said determination, in writing. The bidder may, within ten (10) days after notice is given by the purchasing manager, appeal such determination to the city manager who shall conduct a public hearing to determine whether or not the bidder is a responsible bidder. ['he decision oI'tl~c cilx m:ma,zer stnaxll be tinal. shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Fhe purchasing m~ager shall have the authority to awed contracts (including capital outlay items) which have been.budgeted ~d for which there ~e sufficient t~nds appropriated. Contracts which exceed the appropriated ~o~t, or which ~e not budgeted. shall not be awarded except upon approval of the city council. G. Tie Bids. If two or more bids received ~e for the sine tot~ mo=t or unit price, q~iW ~d se~ice being equal. the City may, in its discretion, accept eider bid submi~ed. H. Perfo~ce Security. A perfo~=ce bond, ce~ificate of deposit or c~h may be required before entering into a contract. in such amount as is deemed re~onably necessaw to protect ~e interes~ of ~e City. If peffo~ce sec~ is req~e~ ~e accep~le ~ ~d mo~t ~ereof sh~l be described in the notice inviting bids ~d, if a ~nd, ~e fore of ~e bond sh~l be m dete~ined by the City attorney. 3.08.~. Informal bid procedure. P~chmes of supplies, equipment ~d se~ice's of a v~ue established by resolution requiring iffom~ bid proced~es, shall be made by the p~chming m~er by the i~om~ bid process pm~t to ~e procedure prescribed in this section ~d without obse~ing the proced~e described in Section 3.08.080 of this Chapter. A. Minimum Number of Bids. [ntb~al bid purchases shall. whenever possible, be b~ed on at least three t3) bids and shall be aw~ded to the lowest responsible bidder. B. Solicitation of Info,at Bids. The p~chasing m~ager sh~l solicit info~ bids by written requests to prospective vendors, x'ia [k~X machine, by telephone, electronically, or by ~y other means deemed eftEctive. C. [nt'ormat Bids. [nl'ormal bids ~hall ¼o submitted. in writing. to the purchasing of bids or the placing of an order. D. The purchasing manager shall establish lists, by categou or type, of persons, fi~s, p~nerships or co~orations capable of and willing to submit bids for goods, se~ices or supplies ~d shall invite submittals for placement on said lists. When requesting the submiual of info~al bids, it shall be the duty of the purch~ing m~ager to rotate the nines of interested persons, fi~s, p~ership or co~orations so ~ to m~ize ~e nm~r of~tentifl bidders. Any bid submined in a timely f~hion during an info~fl bid proced~e shall be considered even if no notice w~ previously provided to the bidder. The purch~ing. m~ager shall, ~nher, post a list of goo&, se~ic~ ~d supplies proposed to ~ p~c~ed so ~ to ~t ~terest~ p~ies to bid ~n. S~d ~sfing s~l comply ~ ~y md fll applicable ~ ~mg to pos~g, ~ adopted by ~e ciW council. E. Nomm~g my o~er t~ or ~vision offs S~fion 3.08.090, ~e prodsiota of Subs~fiom D, E, F,G ~d H of Section 3.08.080 s~l ~ ~plicable to inforaft bi&. 3.08.1ffi. Open market procedure. ~e p~chming m~ager may procure goods, se~ices md supplies tbr the City without resort to either the focal bid or info~al bid proced~es with reg~d to p~chmes in mounts within ~e open m~ket procedure limits. as established by resolution. The p~ch~ing m~ager sh~l m~n~n lists of providers capable of supplying such goods, se~ices ~d supplies ~d shall rotate the use thereof. 3.08.110. BiddinE for ~ublic wor~ projects. Public works proiects. ,~s defined ~ l[~c talifi~rnia Public Contract Code shall be bid. seq. Public works projects not exceeding the amount specified in California Public Contract Code Section 2016 I, as the same may be amended fi'om time to time, shall be awarded pursuant to the informal bid process above. 3. 08.120. Inspection and testing,. The purchasing agent. or such person as may be appointed by the purchasing manager, may inspect the supplies and equipment delivered to determine their conformance with the specifications set forth in the order. The purchasing manager shall have authority to require chemical or physical tests o/samples submitted with bids and samples or deliveries which are necessary to determine their quality and conformance with the specifications. 3.08.130. Conii~titiv~ negoti-tlo~ (Previously adopted and now incorporated) The purchasing manager may, in place of formal bidding procedures, institute procurement by a process of sealed proposals and competitive negotiation if a proposed purchas~ involves goods, equipment or products of a uniqtm and complex design and/or must be manufactured or assembled to the particular needs of the City. The city manager or his or her designee must approve of such purchasing procedure and purchases. 3.08.140. Discretionary approvals. (Previously adopted and now incorporated) In discretionary approvals related to engineering and planning, if a professional services agreement is required for which the City is to be reimbursed, the City will select the consultant 3.08.150. Disposition of surplus supplies and eq~.[pment. All using departments shall submit to the purchasing manager, at such times and on such forms as the purchasing agent shall prescribe. reports showing all supplies and equipment which 5o2. are no longer used or which ha~c become ob~,,,lete or ,~orn out. 'Fhe purchasing manager shall have authority to cxch'an,~c ~i,t-,,t :~';~dc :'.~,,~ r~c',~ -t~l,t, l ic~ :~nd equipment all supplies and equipment which have become unsuitable tbr City use. A. Such items so declared to be surplus shall be offered for sale on a competitive bid basis. Bids may be solicited by written request, telephone, fax machine, by public auction, by use of an auction service by advertisement in any newsp. aper or magazine, or by any combination of such methods. B. When, after a reasonable effort has been made to obtain competitive bids, no offers are received for any item of City-owned personal property so declared to be surplus, the purchasing manager is authorized to dispose of such item tbr the highest scrap value that can be obtained therefore and if a reasonable effort to do so produces no opportunity to sell the same for scrap, the purchasing manager may cause its destruction or any other disposition thereof. C. The City may sell obsolete or surplus property to any other governmental agency at an established fair market value without other bids. D. The City may donate surplus personal property to any agency or entity which is exempt from federal income tax, with the approval of the City Council. 3.08.160 Recycled product procurement policy (Previously adopted and now incorporated) A. All City departments. offices and commissions shall, at least annually, conduct a review of existing and future product and service specifications to determine whether existing specifications either require the use of products manufactured from virgin materials or exlude the use of recycled products. reusable products or products designed to by recycled. B. In the event that such specifications do exclude the use of recycled products or require the use of virgin materials. then such exclusions or requirements must be eliminated unless the pertinent department or cntitx ,:a~ demonstrate to the satisthction or' the city manager that such recycled products would not achieve a necessary performance standard. C. All City departments and agencies shall, at least annually and following the review described in Subsection "A", above, recommend changes to the city manager to ensure that performance standards for particular products can be met and that specifications are not overly stringent, and to recommend changes to ensure that specifications will incorporate a requirement for the use of recycled materials, reusable products, and products designed to be recycled to the maximum extent practicable, subject to an alternative showing that either the performance of the product will be jeopardized or that the product will negatively impact health, s,~f'ety or opemtion~l efficiency. D. Outside contra~:tors bidding to provide tn, odimts or s~ri¢~ to the city, including printing services, must demonstrate that they will comply with the specifications described in Subsection C of this Section to the greatest extent feasible. E. City staff will, to the greatest extent possible, utilize high-speed copiers that will accept recycled paper. In addition, recycled paper shall be purchased and used in all copy machines that will accept it. F. When recycled products are used, reasonable efforts shall be undertaken to label the products to indicate that they contain recycled materials. City departments and agencies shall use for their masthead stationery and envelopes recycled paper that includes postconsumer recycled content and indicate on the paper and envelopes that they contain recycled material. Other recycled products used by the Ci~~ shall also indicate that they contain recycled material to the extent practicable. G. A five percent price pret~rence may be Biven to recycled products, reusable products oI'ti~red ~s ~ltei'm~ix c> t~ di~[~c,J~!c l~l'~d~ct~. ~md t~I'~dL~cts dcsig. ned to ¼e recycled where they are offered as alternatives to nonrecyclable products. H. The City will cooperate to the greatest extent feasible with neighboring City and county governments in an effort to develop a comprehensive, consistent and effective procurement effort intended to stimulate the market for recycled products, reusable products and products designed to be recycled. I. All related City departments shall work cooperatively to further the purposes of this Section. The City's economic development Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction or by preemptive legislative action, such decision or legislative action shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences clauses, phrases, or other portions might subsequenfiy be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by legislative action. Seelien 4. Penalties for Violation of Ordinance. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, partnership or corporation to violate or to fail to comply with Section 3.08.070.B.4 of Chapter 3.08, as adopted by this Ordinance. Any person, finn, partnership or corporation violating or failing to comply with Section 3.08.070B.4 shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ISI.ul)0.(){)i. or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months. ,~r by both such fine and impri>,,nmcnt. lac[q and cx crx' persoil. tirm. partnership. or co~oration shall be deemed gu~ffy of a separate ot'tbnse tbr each and every day or ~y potion thereof during which ~y violation of Sections 3.08.070.B.4 is commi~ed, continued or periled by such person, fi~, p~nership or co~oration, and shall be deemed p~ishable ~erefor ~ provided in this Ordin~ce. Section 5. The City Clerk shall ceni~ to the adoption of~is Ordin~ce ~d sh~l ca~e ~e sine to be published ~ required by law. PASSED tMs ~ day of ,1998. William J. Alexander, Mayor I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamogna, held on this day of ,1998, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of .1998, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 15, 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner FNVIRONMFNTA! IMPACT RI=PORT (.FIP0 FOR (~!::N!::RA! P! AN AMFN!')M!=NTS 96-03R AND 97-01 AN!3 VICTORIA COMMUNITY P! AN AM!=NDM!=NTS 96-01 ANn 97-01 - SOUTHFRN CA! IFORNIA FDISON - A' public headng on a draft Final EIR prepared for the following: General Plan Amendment 96-03B and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-01 ~o change the land use designation from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 35.65 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; General Plan Amendment 97-01 and Victoda Community Plan Amendment 97-01 to change the land use designation from UC to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and I-15; and the consideration by the City of alternative land use designations of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between Highland Avenue and Church Street -APN: 227-091-41,227-201-33, 227- 351-65, 227-393-01 and 02, and 229-021-56. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission recommends certification of the EIR, adoption of the Statement of Overriding Consideration, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. BACKGROUND On March 11 and 25, 1998, the Planning Commission conducted public hearings to review the final Environmental impact Report. At the March 25, 1998, public hearing, an attorney representing the property owner on the south side of Foothill Boulevard raised a concern with the mitigation of a 25- foot wide parkway requirement at the east side of Day Creek Boulevard. This issue is addressed in the related General Plan and Victoda Community Plan Amendments report. A copy of the final EIR was delivered to the Council on March 30, 1998. CITY CQUNCIL STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 96-03B & 97-01, VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 April 15, 1998 Page 2 - SCE ANALYSIS Ao Purpose of an I~1~: The purpose of the Environmental Impact Report is to inform the public about any significant impacts to the physical environment as a result of a project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public participation. The content in the EIR becomes a planning tool for the City Council to use in determining an appropriate and best land use arrangement for the project area and for the entire City. The detailed analysis of the identified impacts and mitigation as a result of the proposed land use amendments are contained in the attached Planning Commission staff report dated March 11, 1998. So Statement of Overriding Considerations: As a result of residential and commercial development, the short term and long term air quality impacts will exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management Distdct (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance. The mitigation listed in the EIR cannot reduce the impact~ to a less than significant level. Therefore, the air quality impacts are still considered significant and unavoidable because further mitigation is technically and economically infeasible. According to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City must balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental dsks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts, the City may adopt a statement of its view that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts are acceptable because of overriding concerns. Attached to the City Council Resolution is the proposed Facts of Findings and Statements of Overriding Coneidemtione. FACTS FOR FINDING The Planning Commission recommends the Council make the findings and conclusions as contained in the attached City Council Resolutions and Ordinances. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public headng in the Inl=nd V=li~f n=ily R, Jlletin newspaper, the property was posted with three 4- by 8-foot public headng signs, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site and within approximately 1,000 feet east of the project site between Highland Avenue and the abandoned rail line. A neighborhood meeting was conducted by staff on July 22, 1997, at the beginning of the EIR process; however, no residents attended. City Planner BB:NF:taa Attachments: Exhibit "A" Final EIR Exhibit "B" Planning Commission Staff Reports dated March 11 and 25, 1998 City Council Resolution Certifying the EIR FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B & 97-01 and VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 & 97-01 TRANSMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER on MARCH 30, 1998 EXHIBIT "A" EIR for GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B & 97-01 and VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 & 97-01 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORTS DATED MARCH 11 AND 25, 1998 EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Marcia,25, 1998 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR GENERAL PLAN AMI:NDMI:NTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A public hearing on a draft Final EIR prepared for the following: General Plan Amendment 96.03B and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-01 to change the land use designation from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low-Medium Residential (4.8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 35.65 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; General Plan Amendment 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 97-01 to change the land use designation from UC to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and I-15; and the consideration by the City of alternative land use designations of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between Highland Avenue and Church Street - APN: 227-091-41,227-201-33,227- 351-65, 227-393-01 and 02, and 229-021-56. (Continued from March 11, 1998) BACKGROUND: This item was continued to this hearing for the purpose of complying with the 30-day public review pedod. Attached is the March 11, 1998, staff report. RECOMMI=NDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution recommending that the City Council certify the EIR and adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations. City Planner Attachments: Staff Report dated March 11, 1998 Resolution Recommending Certification of EIR to the City Council DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 11, 1998 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMFNTAL IMPACT RFPORT (EIR) FOR GI:NERAL PLAN AM!=NDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AM!::NDMFNTS 96-01 AND 97-01 - SOUTHF:RN CA! IFORNIA !::DISON - A public headng on a draft Final EIR prepared for the following: General Plan Amendment 96-03B and Victoda Community Plan Amendment 96-01 to change the land use designation from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) on 35.65 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; General Plan Amendment 97-01 and Victoda Community Plan Amendment 97-01 to change the land use designation from UC to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 ac, re~ of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and I-15; and the consideration by the City of alternative land use designations of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between Highland Avenue and Church Street - APN: 227-091-41,227-201-33, 227- 351-65, 227-393-01 and 02, and 229-021-56. Related General Plan Amendments will be considered on March 25, 1998. ABSTRACT: This is the first of two public hearings for the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as part of the required 30 days public review pedod after a Notice of Completion and availability for public review of the draft EIR is advertised in the newspaper. For this hearing, the Planning Commission should review the report, receive public comments, and continue the item to the March 25 hearing. At the next meeting, the Commission will receive public comments again, conclude the hearing, discuss and make recommendations to the City Council for both the EIR certification and the proposed Land Use changes. A copy of the final EIR was delivered to the Commission on February 12, 1998. BACKGROUND: Last April, Southern California Edison (SCE) processed applications to change the land use designation for their surplus utility corridor. The utility corridor is located along the east side of the future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and 1-15. According to SCE, the surplus land was sold to private development companies. Staff determined that a focused EIR was required to address the anticipated environmental impacts as a result of additional residential and commercial land available for future development. The City hired a consultant paid for by SCE, to prepare the EIR. Recently, the City has received a development proposal for the section of the utility corridor between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01, VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 - SCE March 11, 1998 Page 2 ANALYSIS: Purpose of an F_JR: The purpose of the Environmental Impact Report is to inform the public about any signi¢cant impacts to the physical environment as a result of a project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public participation. The content in the EIR becomes a planning tool for the Planning Commission and the City Council to use in determining the appropriate and the best land use arrangement for the project area and for the entire City. EIR process for GPA 96-03B and 97-01 and VCPA 96-01 and 97-01: The EIR has been processed in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): Notice of Preparation (NOP): On July 10, 1997, a NOP of a draft EIR for the proposed land use changes was circulated. Six responses were received and they were: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chaffey Joint Union High School District, Eftwanda School District, Cucamonga County Water Distdct (CCWD), Scuthem California Association of Government (SCAG), and California Department of Transportation. The consultants incorporated the comments from these agencies with the preparation of the draft EIR. Scoping and Neighborhood Meeting: On July 10, 1997, a notice of the scopingJneighborhood meeting was sent to all responsible agencies and property owners within and beyond the required 300 feet of the project site. Staff expanded the notification boundahes to approximately 1,000 feet east of the project site between Highland Avenue and the railroad tracks. The pu,'~e of th~ $coping/neighborhood meeting was to obtain public input eady in the EIR process. The notified property owners were invited to attend the meeting at 7 p.m. on July 22, 1997 in the City Hall. Members of staff, members of the City's consultants and the applicant were at the meeting. No property owners attended the meeting, Draft FIR Circulation (Notice of Completion): The draft EIR was completed on November 12, 1997, and circulated according to CEQA requirements with the public review pedod ending on December 29, 1997. Eight comments were received and they were: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, SANBAG, SCAG, State Clearinghouse (OPR), Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, Chino Basin Municipal Water District, Metropolitan Water District, and Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The consultant prepared responses to the comments and revised the pertinent sections of the document to address them. Final FIR and Notice of Availability for Public Review: The Final EIR was completed and circulated on February 18, 1998, to those agencies that responded to the draft EIR. The Notice of Availability for public review was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper with the review period ending on March 25, 1998. Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation: This section of the report describes and summarizes the significant impacts and the mitigations that reduce them to a less than significant level. Exhibit "D" is the detailed list of the significant impacts and the mitigation. Drainage: The proposed project would increase the water runoff because of the increase in the impervious surface as a result of future residential and commercial development. The drainage study identified the required changes to the Master Plan PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01, VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 - SCE March 11, 1998 Page 3 storm drain facilities to account for the increase m developable land. With the ~mptement, ation of the required storm drain facilities, the impacts will be reduced to a less than ~gnificant level. Traffic and Circulation: The change in land use will increase the number of vehicular tnps. A Traffic Study and a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) were done to comply with the local and regional requirements of Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) and San Bernardino County (SANBAG). Eleven key intersections in the City and two freeways were identified for improvements as shown in Exhibit "D." At the time of development, developers will be responsible for contributing their fair share of improvements by paying the City's adopted traffic impact fees and/or constructing the required improvements. Also, at each phase of development, a site specific traffic study will be required to determine whether the incremental increase in traffic would cause any of the intersections under investigation to result in unsatisfactory level of service and the mitigation to address them. As a result of the mitigation, the traffic and circulation impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level. The following eleven intersections and two freeways were identified for improvements: Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Rochester Avenue and Highland Avenue Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard Eftwanda Avenue and Base Line Road Eftwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard 1-15 southbound ramp and Base Line Road East Avenue and Base Line Road 1-15 between Jurupa Street and 1-10 I-15 between Fourth Street and Foothill Boulevard Air Quality: The short and long term air quality impacts as a result of residential and commercial development will exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance. According to the EIR, the impacts coming from the grading and the construction activities of the project area can be mitigated to a less than significant level. The mitigation is as listed in Exhibit "D." The increase in vehicular tdps because of the residential and commercial development would produce emissions that exceed SCAQMD daily thresholds of pollutants. However, the mitigation described in Exhibit "D" cannot reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. The impacts are still considered significant and unavoidable. Further mitigation is technically and economically infeasible. This issue will be further discussed in Section E of the report. Noise: The noise from the grading and construction activities as well as noise from traffic will impact the existing and future residential areas. Implementation of the mitigation listed in Exhibit "D" will reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01, VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 - SCE March 11, 1998 Page 4 Schools: Project area is within Eftwanda School District and Chaffey Joint Union High School District. Schools within the two districts are at or above capacity. Future developm~"ht will generate more students for the already impacted school districts. The total number of students generated by the project is based on the number of dwelling units for each land use category ( the highest density on the total acreage of each land use category) multiplied by the student generation rates from both school districts. Exhibit "1" is a table that shows the breakdown of the number of new students by grades. The estimated increased number of new students to the two school districts are 328 students for K - Grades 5, 146 students for Grades 6 - 8, and 151 students for Grades 9 - 12. To reduce the impact to a less than significant level, the developer at each phase of development projects will have to enter in an agreement with both school districts to provide adequate mitigation and participate in the school districts' Mello- Roos Community Facilities Districts for alternative methods to finance the mitigation of school impacts. The City has received a response from Chaffey Join Union High School Distdct that they have accepted the mitigation listed in Exhibit "E" as adequate. Police and Fire Protection: Future development within the project area will place considerable demand 'on law enforcement and fire protection services. The impacts can be reduced to a less than significant level by forming and/or joining the Law Enforcement and the Fire Protection Community Facilities Districts to pay for and provide the services to the project area. Park =nd Recreation: The residential portion of the proposed project will increase the demand for active recreation facilities causing an impact to City parks. The impact can be reduced to a less than significant level. At the time of development, the developer will be responsible for dedicating. the equivalent of 11.3 acres in park fees or in park land. Also, the proposed project would increase the demand for trail use in the City. A mitigation is to widen the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard to 25 feet and provide a multi-use trail from Highland Avenue south to terminate at the City's adult sport complex. This multi-use trail should be designed to connect to the planned or existing trail system in the Eftwanda North Specific Plan. The specific design of the multi-use trail could be determined at the time of development plans. Aesthetics: The change in land use would replace 84.15 acres of undeveloped open space corridor with residential and commercial uses, which would significantly alter the existing and future view corridor. The impact can be reduced to a less than significant level with the increase in parkway width at the east side of Day Creek Boulevard and the landscape edge treatments as listed in Exhibit "D." Cultural Resources: The potential for historic human burials may be present in a small portion of the project area specifically on the north side of Base Line Road approximately 500 feet in distance. A mitigation is to require a qualified archeologist to be present on site during rough grading and other significant ground disturbing activities. 10. Biological Resources. and Resoonse from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: A biological assessment was prepared for the project area. The consultant followed the "protocol" of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFVVS) in surveying the site for the California Gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino Merriam Kangaroo Rat. They did not find or trap PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01, VCPA 96-01 & 97-0t - SCE March 11, 1998 Page 5 the two mentioned species. They determined that the Coastal Sage Scrub present on ~sotated portions of the site is probably remnant Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub. The Sage Scrub hab~at is of poor quality when compared to the prime habitat in north Eftwanda area, because the vegetation is dominated almost exclusively by a single species, California Buckwheat. They further found that the habitat is fragmented from the north Eftwanda Preserve and surrounding buffer land. They concluded that there is no adverse impact on the viability of biological resources and that long term habitat preservation planning would not be precluded. The consultant stated that mitigation is not warranted. However, the USF"WS responded to the draft EIR and recommended that the Southern California Edison Company establish a mitigation bank, by conserving an area contiguous with the North Eftwanda Preserve, into which subsequent developments would be required to buy their fair share. The USFVV$ did not include its recommendation of the parameters of mitigation, that is the number of acres to be mitigated and land banked. Staff supports our consultant's conclusion that mitigation is not warranted. Exhibit "E" are the USFWS comments a&d our consultant's responses. .D. The Proposed Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan fMSHCP} and the Interim Project Review Guidelines: In 1995, the City along with 11 participating cities, the County, the USFWS and California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to cooperate in the development of a Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for ~ sens'~ive habitats. The County is the lead agency in preparing the plan with an extended completion of the plan e~timated at year 2002. The MOU also establishes Interim Review Guidelinee allowing projects to proceed while the MSHCP is under development. Exhibit "1=" is a copy of the MOU with the Intedm Project Review Guidelines. The Interim Review Guidelines state that the recommendations of the USFVVS and DFG are advisory. The final decisions of whether to approve, modify, or deny a project remains in the hands of the lead agency, which in this case is the City. The City retains the discretion to make the determination that a project within the MSHCP area, because of the project's characteristics, has no impact on the viability of biological resources and would not preclude long term preservation planning. unavoidable Im!;)acts: As stated in the above Section C-3, even with the implementation of the mitigation, air quality impacts cannot be reduced to a less than significant level. The City must balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental dsks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts, the City may adopt a statement of its view that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts are acceptable because of overriding concerns. Exhibit "J" is the proposed Facts of Findings and Statements of Overnding Considerations for the Commission's review. Alternatives Considered: As required by CEQA, a total of four alternatives were considered, namely, no proje~Jdevelopment, open space greenbelt and trail, lower density, and off-site project. Exhibit "G" is a table that compares the four alternatives to the proposed project. A no project/development alternative is environmentally superior. However, it fails to meet the City's objectives to provide a variety of housing, preserve the single family character of residential neighborhoods, protect neighborhood quality, and provide in-fill residential and commercial development within the context of a planned community. Open space greenbelt and trails alternative would have less significant environmental impacts. However, the implementation of this alternative would have a maintenance financial burden on the City in PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01. VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 - SCE March 11, 1998 Page 6 light of Proposition 218 which made this alternative riscally infeasible. The lower density and the off-site alternatives have similar impacts when compared to the proposed project. The lower density ,~"ould reduce the demand on public services such as schools, parks, and safety. Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP): CEQA requires the City to adopt a monitoring program for ensuring compliance of the adopted mitigation measures or changes that are required to be made to the project, as shown in Exhibit "H." The MMP is a reporting program, which identifies each adopted mitigation or required change in the project design that reduces the impacts to a less than significant level. It is intended for the City to gauge the effectiveness of the mitigation measures. Conclusion: Based on the above analysis, staff believes that the EIR has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the recommendation to the City Council to determine the EIR adequate and certify it. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three 4 by 8 feet public hearing signs, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site and within approximately 1,000 feet east of the project site between Highland Avenue and the railroad tracks. RFCOMM~:NDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission conduct the hearing to receive public input, have questions for staff and continue the item to the March 25 hearing. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Exhibit "G" - Exhibit "H" - Exhibit "1" Exhibit "J" - Final EIR (Document Transmitted Separately) Project Area EIR Process Schedule Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation Comments from Agencies and Response to Comments MOU and MSHCP Interim Review Guidelines Project Alternatives Under Consideration Mitigation Monitoring Program Number of New Students Table Proposed Statement of Facts of Findings and Statement of Overriding Consideration Resolution Recommending Certification of EIR to the City Council Land Use Amendment for Edison Utility Corridor (GPA 96-03B & GPA 97-01) (VPCA 96-01 & VPCA 97-01) ':--FOOTHILL I:ILV~J! ! Figure 2 ST. EXHIBIT B 1 0.57 0 0.57 1.14 Miles N W E s '/ S.B.C.F.C. L/.,.,D USE AMENDMENT FOR EDISON UTILITY CORRIDOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 96-03B & VCPA 96-01 3ase Line Rd ii"'"~ H M Highland Ave RESIDENTIAL L~)w Dc:naily (2-4 DU/AC') L~w Mcdh,m Dcn.nhy (4-8 DU/AC') Mcdl.m D..:nsily (g-14 DU/AC'} Mctlium lligh D:nshy (14-24 DU/A High Dcnsity (24-30 DU/AC') COMMERCIAL 1000 PUBLIC & QUASI-I'U'BLIC E Elcmcn~ary School JKJl Junior 11igh 11iljh I'nrk~ SBCFC San Ilcr'n~rdino County Flood Conln)l UC L~ilhy Corrldot 0 1000 2000 Feel EXHIBIT B2 Figure 4 L~ ,D USE AMENDMENT FO~. EDISON UTILITY CORRIDOR CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 97-01 & VCPA 97-01 ,[ Community Facilhy NC Nci~ hborhem~ Commcn=ial O~c~ Park RC Ree~nllnnal Cmnnmrcinl RRC Re~o~I Reinted Cenlcr Rcglo~l ~lntcd O~cc/~mmc~inl VC Villacc Com~ial I'UULIC & QUASI-PUBLIC E Elcmcnlnry School JR.i[ Junior lligh School 1[$ Iligh School l'~rk~ SBCFC San t. lcrn~rdino Counly I:1ood Contr~)| UC LMliIy Corridor EXHIBIT B3 1000 0 1003 Figure 3 FOCUSED EIR PROCESSING SCHEDULE GPA 96-03 & 97-01 / VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 TASK Task No. I - Project inl~ation Project Initiation EIR Consultant Selection Authorization to Proceed Task No. 2 - Notice of Preparation NOP Initiated Scoping and Neighborhood Meeting Consultant Prepares Draft EIR Task No. 3 - Screen Check Screen Check Draft EIR to City Consultant Prepares Revisions Task No. 4 - Draft EIR Draft EIR Circulation (NOC) Draft Review Pedod Ends Task No. 5 - Final EIR Consultant Prepare Response to Comments Revisions to EIR Response to Comments Circulated (Final EIR) Notice of Availability of Draft EIR for Public Review Task No. 6 - Public Hearings Planning Commission Public Hearings City Council Certification of EIR for General Plan and Community Plan Amendment City Council Ordinance (2nd Reading) DATE 5/5//97 5/29/97 COMMENTS 7/2/97 RFQ mail-out RFQ proposals due Selection of Consultant City Council Approval (1 O-day notice required) 7/10/97 7/22/97 30 day Public Review Period (8/14/97 deadline) No public attended 9/2/97 Revisions to TIA 11112/97 12/29/97 45-day Public Comment Period Additional TIA revisions needed 2./18/98 2/23/98 Advertised 2/23/98 - 30 day Public Review Period ends 3/25/98 3/11/98 3125/98 10 day notice Apdl 1998 10 day notice EXHIBIT C '7/ EIR for GPA 96-03B & 97-01 and VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION EXHIBIT "D" Associates, I~c. 4.2 Issues/Impacts Tramc (Continued) Mitigation Measures i~lpter Av~,~"~oothill Boulev~. Signal ohaslne of :the p~imh~d~fl~lal shall be uomlded to accc~nmodale Day Creek 1oulevnrd/!liBhlnnd Avenue. Co ...... ion of tht tr,d~MJ, d and -,.stbou.M .iff. ht turn IJMCS t~ sha.cd thrm.~k FI I d#kt Ixlm brits. The foilswins is vecom- Cq~.r.w. inn of a ~torthhound left turn line. ~a k-con~l nmddmu~ thmu~'l~ lane and a ~l~t~11 Dim fiidH mm I-qe. ,,dt~l of a amlddipund le]t mm ~ne. a accorid Kmddmund through lane and a ~rl .k~pmh Dlu~, flal~ ~urll !eqe. fd nq t-m,.lipund d,fa. wh dus rieht turn westbound left rum !nqe, and westbound thfo,~h ~ ~ht mm lane. m~t~n ~ ~ imp: ; C_41qr.u~ion of du~ pojlhhound lef~ turn lanes. ; ~~n of a no~u~ mht mm lane. ; ~n~ of dud ~~ ~ turn lanes. ~p-~m~n of a south~u~ fiuht turn ~ne. ,~ of dud e~ ~fi mm lanes. ~ ~a thi~ e~u~ ~hmeh lain. ~~ of an e~u~ ~ht turn lane. Analysis of Sigfiificance 2/8/98(R:\CRG730~FEIR\TABLE 1 __ I. FN L) i. SA A.~socl.tes. !.c 4.2 Issues/impacts Tramc (Continued) Mitigation Measures ; Con-traction p~ dual westbound left turp lanes, Day Creek ~mak~ootldll Bodeyard. Cou .... ion of the d~t ~ f ,~n,.Od~mnd and ..~tbo~.~l t~ &co ~t ,l~a lam. s.The folk,~wtqa ~ recommended miti~d,~ ~j~ ~ ~tet~ection: - ~[i[][[[W~![~ of dua~l nol~m4pd left turn lanes, . Canelp.rtifiq of a not~l~ound free rl~t turn lane. ~~ ofa f~ ~~ ~ht !urn lane. Etlwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulev~'d. Addition of a amaldmund d~ht mm lane and a third eastbound throuah Analysis of Significance 2/~/98(K'~RG730~FEIE\TABLE I_ ! .FNL) 1-6 LSA Assot't~ile~. Ivlc. 4.2 Issues/Impacts Tramc (Continued) Mitigation Measures · 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road. Addition of dual ..,.~1~1 kft tu,n lar~s.AcldlRglp Or a se,;ond westbound !,-f~ turn lane ¢dual left turn lane~ tralJk: at the ~mbound avtwoach and a southbound free £iaht turn for riff-ramp traffic. · !-15 fie,.& ~J Ibu.,ps/B&Jc Linc Road. Addition of a second i~lhboul~ kfi turn lan~ (d~,al I~fi lu,~ lane), a ~.~.(,,NI cl,4b~ll~cl i~fl Ix..n I&n( (~lual kfl third .~.dbound throu~,h fane, a¢,d e~,,.c,sio~ of the r,..,ttld~ound ,~l~t I~,~ lane Io · ace ,Ikht tu,n fane. · East Avenue/Base Une Road. Acld;tion of a thircl bo~,ocl thtoulJ~ llnc. The westhound approach shall incb~ a ~inl throuuh lane. 4.Z.IB. Circulation Improvements have been identified to achieve standards ~ of ~ervlce (i.e., local jurisdiction and/or SANBAG) at study area intersections. To address the timing, funding, and Implemenlatto~ of these Improvements, the following mitigation measure or condition of General Plan Amendment approval is recommended. Prior to the aplm~val of any tract map, a tramc study shall be completed Io determine whether the incremental increase in Irafllc from the tract map area causes any of the tnlersec- tiou$ UIIK~PA' I~l~llon to result in unsatisfactory levels of service. If unacceptable levels of service result, this traffic analrs11 shall determine the portion of the ultimate intersec- tions' Improvements that are required, the phasing of the improvement, and the funding source. Analysis of Significance 2/8,,98(R :~C!~G 730~F EI.R\TAB L£ I_ ! .FN L) L',A An~oclates, i~tc Issues/Impacts 4.2 Traffic (Continued) Impact 4.2.2. The proposed project will contribute to deficiencies along !- i 5 between Jurupa Avenue and 1-10 and between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. 4.3 Air Quality Impact 4.3.1. Construction equipment emissions would exceed the SCAQMD daily thresholds for the criteria pollut- ant of NOx, which is 2 5 tons per quarter or 100 pounds per day. Emissions of other criteria pollntants would be below die standards. This is a significant impact. Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance 4.2.2. The project shall contribute on a fair share basis to the cost of providing the following freeway lane addilions: 1-15 between Jurupa Street and 1-10 - two lane mainline lanes in each direction. 1-15 between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard - two mainline !ane~ in each direction. Mitigated Io below a I(-v¢l of sig. ifi- cance. 4.3. LA- The Construction Contractor shall select the construction Miligaled to beh)w equipment used onsite based on low emission factot~ and high significance. eneqly efllelency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that con~tructlon gradln~ plans include a statement that all construc- tlon equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer'a q~ecifications. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C. The Corm ruction Contraclor shall ensure that construc- tion grading plans ificlude a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall lenglh o[ the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, Io minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.1D. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if neces- sary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safely adjacent to existing roadways. 2/8/98(R:\CRG730TEIR\TABLE I_ 1 FNL) I-8 LgA Ass¢~ctates, I~c. Issues/Impacts 4.3 Air Quality (Continued) Impact 4.3.2. During grading activities dust emission would exceed Ihe SCAQMD threshold of 150 pounds per day. This is a significant impact. Mitigation Measures 4.3.1E. The Construction Contractor shall suppot1 and encour- age ridesharlng and transit incentives for the construction crew. The Conslruction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4.3.4F. J~ cleveloo~ shall contract with a mitioation monitor to i~t,re coml)l!la~- sqd imolcmenlation with the mitination monltofine ~ 4.3.2A. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control me~urea listed below. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportaliolt of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprtnlder sy~-'rns shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be u~-xl to Im'ep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a mini- mum, thi~ would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. After cleaving, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area ol'dtstud~ed ~oil shall be treated immedlatel~ I~ pitirap of the soil until the area is paved or o~ dg. vefoped so that dust generation will not occur. d0 Soll stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of orlgln. Analysis of Significance Mitigaled to below a level ~,f significance. 2~/98(R:\CRG730LFEIR\TABLE 1_! FNL) !-9 1.%4 Ass~ctates, Inc Issues/Impacts 4.3 Air Quality (Continued) Impact 4.3.3. Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emis- sions associated with architectural coatings are not calcu- lated because there is no sufficient information available for emissions produced by the paintinS of residential and commevrial facilities. VOCs produced during construction may be a potentially significant impact. Impact 4.3.4. Vehicular tr~ps associated with the proposed project would produce emissions that would exceed the SCAQMD daily thresholds for the criteria pollutant of CO, ROC, and NOx This is a significant impact. 2/8,,98(R:'~CRG 730~ EIB\TAB LE ! _ !. FNL) Mitigation Measures 4.3.3.The Construction Conu-actor shah utilize as much as possible ~ 0akwed building materials, water-based or low-vOC coatting, and coalin~ Mr or spray equipment with high transfer e~ciency, such as high volume low ptessure ~ spray method, or manual coatings NNdk:afioo such as paint hgush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, 0~ sponge. 4.3.4A. The pgu~ shall comply with Title 24 off the Callfomia Code of Regulations established by the Energy Commission tega~!ing enet~r conservation standards. The pro~-ct applicant shall incorpo- rate the follmvt~ in building plans: · Planting trees to pmvldc shade and shadow to building; Solar or lus~... ' - ~ n water heaters shall be treed with comblned space/wa~ heater unit; Ile611~, t~fw#heacuumpowerinsulation; · DoulMe.pMned ibss or ~dow ueaunem for enetw/conservation shall be uaed in sill exterior windows; and · Energg. dlctem Iow-sodlum paddng lot lights shall be used. 4.3.4B. Use of transportation demand measures (TDM) such as preferential ~ ~ vanpooling/calpoo[~, sul~idy for transit pass or ~ carpoollng, Ilex, time ~ schedule, bike racks, lodners, sl~ ~ o~dte cafeteria shall he iocorporated in the ~l~.i[11~[~lrtt4ur omicJa~s oef ~- ~1 mavevors rin~ ~t~il]~rgj~l[]~m~ptatiofi with Ih~ IHitiaallon monitor- Analysis of Significance Mitigated to b~iow a hwcl of significance. Operational emissi().s ()! the pro- posed project wouhl rcsuh in a total of 851 Ibs./day ol C(), 6.1 Ibs./day R~, 1~6 I~./day oi N()x, 15 I~./day olS~, and IO lbs/day PMi0. ~ong them, the cmissio~ls for CO, R~, and N(~x would ex- ceed the S~QMI) thrcsh()hls fi)r daily o~rations by a I;irgr margin (es~clally N~). !~v~'. after imple- mentation the milig;~ti~)s~ mvasures identified, it is not gu:~rantccd that the emissions would I~· r~duccd ~1owthe thresholds '!'hcrcfi~re, ~uld remain a sigmlicant impact I-!0 It Issues/Impacts 4.4 No~e Impact 4.4.1. Noise levels from grading and other con- struction activities for the proposed project may ranse up to 91 dBA at the closest residences immediately to the east of the northern part of the project site between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road for very liralied times when construction occurs near them. The construction-related noise impacts of the proposed project would be a po~en- ltally significant impact. Impact 4.4.2. Increases in noise levels could result from project.related traffic on access roads leading to the project site, especially given the higher noise generation associaled with trucks. Project-related long-term vehicular trip in- creases are anticipated to be moderate. The incremental traffic noise level increases would be less than significant. No signLllcant traffic noise impacts on off-site ~enattive uses are anticipated. However, proposed on-site residential uses would potentially he exposed to traffic noise levels exceed- ing the 60 dBA Ldn standard recommended for residential uses. Mitigation Measures 4.4.1A. During all project site excavation and grading on-site, the project contractor~ shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. 4.4.1B. The project contractor shall place all stationary construc- tion equipment ~o that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptot~ to the east of the site. 4.4.1C. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staRinR in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors to the east o~ the Mte during all prt)ject construction. 4.4.1D. D~rins all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all constroction-related activities that would result in high noi~ levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless such construelion acrivitiea do no~ ve~ult in noise levels exceeding 45 dBA at residences to the east of the site. No construction shall be allowed on Sundip and public holidays. 4.4.2.Noise studlea shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and aplwoval prior to final map approval for residential uniL~ proposed within the following aveas: · Within 408 Feet of Base Line Road centerline; · Within 770 feet of Foothill Bouleva~l centerline; · Within 59? K, et of Day Creek Boulevard centerline between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; · Within 438 feet of Day Creek Boulevard centerline between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 344 feet of Highland Avenue centerline. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen herrn or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, buildins facade upgrade,. double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall he provided. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. Mitigated to below a level o[ significance. 2/B/98(R:x, CRG730~F EIR\TABLE I_ 1 FN l) I-Ii i-SA ,,%ssoch~te$, Issues/Impacts 4.5 Public Services ~:hools Impact 4.5.1. As a result of the overcrowding in the classrooms of the Etiwanda and ~ School Oi~'tcta, both dislrk~ have urged and continue to urge the City not to aPlwove development applications unless adequate school facilities are available to serve the development project. Future development will generate more students for Ihe already impacted school districts and is comidered significant. School mitigation plans would be enacted between the ESD/CJU!tSD and the project developer providing for a per dwelling unit fee rate for the residential portion of the project site. IIltl~ation Measures 4.5.1A. A school mitigation plan shall he enacted between the P. SD and the d~/.lop~r to provide for a per dwelling unit fee rate for the resklential portion o[ the project site. The fees will offset the additional demand placed on school district facilities by the residential portion o~ Ihe project 4.5.1B. The developer shall join Chaffey School District Mello- Roo~ Community FscJlities District No.2 (CFD No. 2), in order to provide an alternative method to finance the mitigation of school Impacts of development. 4.5.1C. The develo~r ~ll be required to e~tecute an agreement with ESD and C~UItSD to provide adequate mitigation. Such an n~reemem ~ be executed prior to Planning Commission approval ~o~ ~ ee~idenlial project within the General Plan Amendment a~ell. _,l~__~m__! implementation of the agreement by the payment of flees, dedication of sites or other mitigation will take plaoe as bulld~ permits are obtained. 4.5.1D. In the e~ent that the developer declines to execute a mRt~ation ~ ~r. me:nt, the City shall require full mitigation as a condition O~al!ptoeal. Full mitigation shall he accomplished by means of s tequl~ed~acnt to form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities dielater for school facilities. In order to reduce the billden on ~ &alllee Immeowner~, it is possible to structure the community ~ d~trtct such that some of Ihe special taxes would be peepaid I~f the developer. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a h:vel of significance. 2/B/98(R:\CRGT:~O~F EIR\TABLE I _ I FNL) 1-12 issues/Impacts 4.5 Public Services (Continned) Mitigatio, n Measures Analysis of Significance Rccrgation 4.5.2(1). "~hc residential Donion of the proposed pro~ect would increase Ihe demand for active recreation facilities causing a significant impact to park facilities. To mittgale this shortage of active recreation, future development proposals must provide additional acreage to meet the recreational needs of titis community. 4.5.2(!)& The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 Mitigated to below a level of set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to significance. 'establish regulatlon~ for dedication of land, payment of fees, or ~ both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned ~ communities. Th~ dcveloDer is rcsDonsible for 11.~ acres of oarldand cithcr I~y ~c or by dcdicalion, Impact 4.5.2(2). The residential and commercial areas proposed would increase the demand for active recreational facilities causing a significant impact to trail use in the City. To mitigate the potential impacts to trall~ and to al~o implement the City's Master Plan of Trails, future develop- ment proposal must provide additional acreage for trails to meet the need within the City. ~.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a.tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat ~or approval, the City I~ark al~d Recreation ~mmlasion shall determine whether dedication of property for 11.3 acl'e~ ~ park aml recreational purposes or iu lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, Ihe area shall bc designated on the tentative tract map when submitted ~c] i~ ~eneral Iqan atTlrl]l~nt indicati0~ the location of any Dark ~hali ~t~l~dq~lo 'a~k and ~ccreation Commission review 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted it shall bc accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdirt- · sion Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be depos- ited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(2). The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be widened by 20 to 25 feet to provide a multi-use trafi from Hisbland Avenue,south to terminate at Ihe City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by Ihe'City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek' Boulevard. The specific design. shall tie in with the City~'s Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designeel to conl~ct to planned and cxi51ing Irail systems in the ~ I~.ttwanda INorlh Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas norlh and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. Mitigated to Ix:low :~ Ivvvl ofsignili- cance. 2/B/98(R:\CRG 730~F EIR\TAB I.E !- I 1.%.1 Associates, Inc. 4.5 issues/impacl~ Public Set. ices (Continued) Police Mitigation Measures Analysis of Siglfificance Impact 4.5.3. potentially significant impact as an increase in demand for the Police Department for the City, a sig~-cl consent and waiver significance. police services. An additional five police personnel w~uld form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community be required for the proposed residential and commercial Facilities ~ allall be filed with City Engineering prior to final development. Mitigation of this impact would require that map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever the City exact fees from the developer through an earlsting occurs first for an}, projects within the project area between assessment district or form one to gain the neceaaa~/fonds Highland Avenue and 1-15. Formation costs shall be borne by the for the additional police personnel needed. Developer. The proposed project will result in a 4.5.3A. Aa atated ln the General Requirements and Approvals for Mitigated to below a lcvel of Fire Impact 4.5.4. Impacts of the proposed project on fire service for the City of Rancho Cucamonga are potentially significant. Based on the standard response time threshold of five minutes, and the ptx~ject's location relative to Staffotis 3, 4, and 5, the site is anticipated to fall within the 5 minute response time criteria. 4.6 Aesthetics/Visual 4.5.4A. The developer shall join the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District to provide fire protection services to the site. 4.5.4B. The ck'a~eloper shall install automated fire sprinkler systems in comalercial, industrial, and multi-family residential units in aeco~ with Foothill fRnr~rho Cu,~monnal Fire Protection DilJtfict Ordinance No. 15 and ~,ancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 22. Mitigated to Ixqow significance. Impact 4.6.1. The pro!~scd project would replace an 4.6.1A. New buildings within 100 feet of fot0re Day Creek Mitigated to below :~ level of B4.15-acre undeveloped, open space corridor with residen- Boulevard shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the significance. tial and commercial uses, and would significantly alter view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The existing and future view corridors. This is a potentially City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is significant impact. applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 2/8/98( R:\CRG730~FEIR\TABLE l_ I FNI.) 1-14 I^SA Associates, Inc 4.6 Issues/Impacts Aesthetics/Visual (Continued) Impact 4.6.2. New light and glare would be created by the addition of residences and commercial establishments in an area previously proposed as a utility corridor. The most significant glare would be generated by commercial uses at the southern end of the project site, especially in association with outdoor parking that may be llt at night and that would be visible from roadways such as the future Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Bot,levard, as well as minor roads to the east of the project site such as Victoria Loop, Church Street, and Day Creek Boulevard East. Mitigation Measures 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard shall be no more than eight feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for this Scenic Corykroy, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard. 4.6.1C. The City Planning Department shall amend the Commu- nily Design Criteria Part Ii of the Victoria Community Plan at time offme~{~ tg.~lative l~st} or ~Ilinor subdivision t}lat for its "recom- ecl~e conditions' for future Day Creek Boulevard to show a similar landscape and setback treatment on both the east and west sides off Day Creek Boulevard. While a row of palm trees is now recommended for the west side off Day Creek Boulevard, this proposed landscaping shall be enhanced by short and tall drought-tolerant shrubs adjacent to sound walls to. reduce the visual impacts of such walls. 4.6.1D. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end off the project site to screen new development from the view off motorists along 1-15 looking north. !!owevet, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the moun- lains, using the view corridor provided by the future Da}; Creek Boulevard. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of !. 15. 4.6.2. The Design Itcview process for commercial establishments shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the I~opo~ed i:n'oject. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of tiesign review shall include the followifig: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting fsom outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to beh)w a h'vcl ()f significance. 218DS(R:\CRG7 30~ EIR\TAB LE I_1 .FNL) Associates, I~ic. Issues/Impacts 4.6 Aesthetics/Visual (Continued) Impact 4.6.3. 3'he project could conflict wilh policies of the City's General Plan Community Design Element and landscape recommendations found in the Victoria Commu- nity Plan. This is a potentially significant impact. 4.7 Biological Resources Impact 4.7.1. The proposed project would replace 84. ! 5 acres o[ undeveloped land with residential and comme~ial uses resuhing in the loss of 47.35 acres of coastal sage scrub, 25.22 acres of abandoned vineyard, and ! 1.59 acres of ruderal habitat. These impacts are not considered In be significant and no mitigation is required. MitlRation Measures Analysis of Significance 4.6.3A. Provisions shall be made to account for protection of vlew~heds and plant p~lette plans shown in the Victoria Commu- nity Plan for major Intev~ections along future Day Creek Boule- vard. Such provisions may include the following: building artbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heillhta nearest the lnlerchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscapin~ to eomplement the view~hed. These issues shall he addressed by the City Planning Department as recommenda- tiom for the De~i~n geview process at the time of developing co~litions o~ approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. 4.6.3B. To reduce potential conflicts with policies of the City's CommunlW I~ ~lement, recommended mitigation measures found under 4.KI akall also be implemented. 4.&.3C. The Cot~munity Design Criteria Pan II of the Victoria Community ~ ~ be amended immediately following project approval to ad~ new uses proposed as part of the project. However, a~ p~t o~11tia amendment, some requirements shall be included to veduc~ v~ual impacts o[ new development by Inclusion o~ lam~c~pin~ near major road~ that matches that proposed by the Vlc~ot4a Community Iqan. For example, trees ~hall he pla~ted ~ the site's property lines and along road- ~ to ~ ~ development from view. Within the site and adjacent to nmjo~ error-west con~lov~, the City shall designate ave~ for landacap~, emuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low-~rowing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open Sl~Ce on the project site. Miligated In below a Icvvl o[ significance. 4.7.1. Not cot~ldeted to be significant and no mitigation is Not considered to I~' significant and required. no mitigation is rcq~iired 2/B/98{!l:\CRG730~FEIR\TABLE I_ I FNI.) I-I(; LL.% Assoch2tte~, Inc Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance 4.6Biological Resources (Continued) Impact 4.7.2. Construction of Ihe proposed project site 4.7.2 Not considered to be significant and no mitigation is Not considered Io Ix. sig.ilicant and would result in the loss of San Bernardino Merriam's required. no mitigation is feqtlired kangaroo rat habitat. The loss of the hahilar is considered adverse but not significant. Impact 4.7.3. The coastal sage scrub present on the site 4.7.3. Not considered to be significant and no mitigation is Not considered te~c significant may constitute potential (but unoccupied) habitat for the required. no mitigation is rcqtzircd. California gnatcatcher. The loss of potential habitat is considered adverse but is not a significant impact. 4.8 Cultural Resources Impact 4.8. !. lt~e potential for historic human burials may 4.8.1. In conjunction with the submittal of applications for rough Mitigated to below a I~'vvl ol be present in the portion of Ihe project area that contains grading permits, the applicant shall p£ovide written evidence to significance. Site Pi084-2711. This is a potentially significant impact. the Community Development Department that an archaeologist, listed on the County of San Bernardino list of qualified archeologist~, ha~ been retained and will be present on site during all roul~h ~"adlng and other significant ground disturbing activities. The archeologist shall meet with the Community Development De[mrtment to review procedure~ to be used during such activities. 2/B/98(R:\CRG750~F EIR\TAB LE !_ I FNL) 117 EIR for GPA 96-03B & 97-01 and VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 COMMENTS FROM AGENCIES AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS EXHIBIT "E" Inc. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR The comments on the Draft Emconmental Impact Report (EIR) and individual responses to each are included m thLs section. The primary objective and purpo~se of the EIR public review process ts to obtain comments on the ade- quacy of the analysis of environmental impam, the mitigation measures pre- sented, and other analyses contained m the report. The California Environ- mental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that the City respond to all sigr~'~ant environmental comments m a level of detail commep.$urate to the comment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088). Comments that do not directly relate to the analysis in this document (i.e., are outside the scope of this document) are not given specific responses. However, all comments are included m this section so that the decision makers know the opinions of the commentors. In the process of responding to the comments, portions of the Draft ErR have been revised or deleted, and in some instances new material has been added. However, none of the changes to the Draft ErR are considered to be significant new information (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 [a]). Comment letters are arranged by date of receipt by the City. Aside from the courtesy statements, introductions, and closings, the text of each letter has been divided into individual comments. Brackets and identification numbers m the fight margin of each letter delineate each comment. Following each letter is a page(s) of r~ponses associated with each letter. Each respon.,se is preceded by a number which corresponds to the comment identified on the original letter. LIST OF PERSONS, ORGANIZATIONS, AND PUBLIC AGENC2~S COiI~FIEN2~VG ON ~ DRAF~ ~ The per,ns, organizations, and public agencies that have submitted comments on the Draft ErR through Deeember 27, 1997 are listed below and responded to m this section. Letter A-5 from the Governor's Office of Planning and Re- search (OPR) did not require comment since it~ purpo~ was to inform the City that it has complied with the State EIR re, flew requirements. There were no comments on the Draft ErR received from any individual. A-1 Cbino Basin Municipal Water District Orick H. Robinson Semor Engineering Associate/Specia!i~t A-2 Southern California Association of Got,errrments J. David Stem Manager, Performance Assessment and Implementation United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Ser- Gaff C. Kobetich Field Supervasor 2/6/98 (R: \CRG 730q']~LR~RF..S PTOCO WPD) ~ ~soc~ates. Inc A-4 County of San Bernardino Transportation/Flood Control Depart- merit Surveyor GaLl Cotugna Semor Associate Planner, En~aronmental Management Di~asion A-5 Governor's Office of Planning and Research Antero A. Riversplata Chief, State Clearinghouse A-6 Cba~rey Joint Union Higb School District Susan B. Sundell, Ed.D Director, Business Services 2/6D8 {1~: \CRG730XI' Id. RXRF. SPTOCO -WPD ) CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT A-1 9400 Cherry Ave. B,'~g ;. · r'o,'~tana C.: ~2325 PO. Box 697 · Rancho Cuca,.monga. C,/. ~: 72~ TEL (909) 357-0241 · FAX (909) 35--388.:.' Dr. Robb D. Qumcey Chief £xecutwe Officer General Manager December 18, 1997 RECEIVE City o_f Rancho C ~tannin,~ ,.,. ~Ca~o~o ~ ~IVlSJo~ Ms. Nancy Fong, AICP City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Divi,~ion 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) General Plan Amendments 96- 03B & 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96-01 & 97- 01/Edison Company SCH NO. 97071043 .for the City of Rancho Cucamonga' Dear Ms. Fong: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the DEIR we received on November 19, 1997, for the proposed subject plan amendments. Chino Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD) is a service provider for the south-western portion of San Bernardino County which includes the Cities of Fontarm, Rancho Cucamonga, Ontario, Upland, Montclair, Chino and Chino Hills. The District also provides service to a portion of the former Chino Agricultural Preserve. Programs the District is involved in can be broken down into four primary service programs. These pro¢lrams include regional domestic wastewater treatment and disposal, non-reclaimable wastewater collection and disposal, importation of supplemental water supplies, and water resources management within the Chino Groundwater Basin. In reviewing the DEIR, it was noted in Section 2.5 (EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT) on page 2-8, the second paragraph, the second sentence, that the first phase treatment capacity is incorrectly referenced at 28 million gallons per day (MGD) for Regional Plant No. 4 (RP-4). RP-4 first phase treatment capacity is 7 MGD. John L. Anderson George BorOa Terry Carlin Anne Dunihue Wyatt L. Troxel P,_*s;oent V~ce Presioent Secretary/Treasurer Dfrector D~rec~or A-1 DEIR General Plan Amendments 96-03B &97-01 & ,~ Victoria Communi~ Plan Amendments 96-01 & 97-01/ Edison CO. SCH NO. 97071043 City of Rancho Cucamonga -2- December 18, 1997 The District has no further comments on your DEIR; however, we would appreciate it if you would keep us apprised as your project moves forward. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Very truly yours, Orick H. Robinson Senior Engineering Associate/Specialist OHR c: Gary E. Hackney Mark Kinsey LSA A~oczate~. Inc. ~SPON~ ~I..ETTERA-1 Cbino Basin Municipal Water District -..Section 2.5, Effects Found Not to be Significant, page 2-8, paragraph sentence 2 has been revised as follows: "RP-4 is planned to be located on Etiw'anda Avenue to the east -,f the project site between San Berrtardino Avenue and Arrow Highway. 'this plant will have a first phase treatment catpacity of LaB ~, million gallons per day. Either of these facilities could serve the project site dependent on project phasing; however, 1L-1 would be the most likely treatment 2/6/98CR:\CP. G730XI' ~I~.~SPTOCO A-2 SOUTHERN CALtF©RNIA ASSOCIATION of GOVERNMENTS Main Office 8~8 west Seventh Street t2th Floor Los Angeles. California 9oo~7'3435 t (=:3J 236-t8oo f (2t3) 236-~825 www. sca~,.ca.lov D~mbar 17, 1997 Ms. Nancy Fong, AICP City of Rancho CummongA, Plaaning Division 10~00 Civic Centgr Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Comrru,nt~ on the Draft ~_~1~rOmr-ntni 1mplaCt Report for the Edison ROW Rancho Cucsmonga General Plan and Victoria Comm,mlt7 Plan Amendments - SCAG No. 1 9700621 Dear Ms. Fong: Thank you for submitting the ~ Eavironmeatal Impact Report for the Edison. ROW P-~ancbo Cucamong~ General Ptan and Victoria Comm-nity PLan Amenttw~nts to SCAG for review and comment. As a:eawidc clearinghouse for regionally significant projects, SCAG assists cities, countie~ and other agencies in reviewing projects and plato for consism~ with regional plans. The airached detailed comments are meant to provide guidance for considering the proposed project within the context of our regional goals and policies. If you have any questions r~m'ding the attached comments, please con~:t Bill Boyd at C213) 236-1960. Sinc:e~y, DAVID STEIN ~vlanager, Pafformanc~ Assessment and Implementation COMMENTS ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EDISON RIGHT-OF-WAY GENq~AL PLAN AND VICTORIA CO.gO, IUN1TY PLAN ~D~I'S -. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL EVIPACT RVPORT PROa-VCT n~'-~CRrlrflON The l/near pwject rite is appwximately 330 feet in width and is 10,756 feet long and contains multiple parce. h. The 84.15-acre s/re is located east of the Day Creek Channel and the proposed alignmint of Day Cx~k Boulevard and extends from the 1-15 Freeway north w Highland Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The linear s/te is undeveloped and was pre/dously set aside for a Southern C~lifomia Edison ($CE) utility corridor. The s/re is zoned Utility Corridor within the Victoria Community Plan. SCE proposes to change th~ Utility c'~'ridor de~/gnafion to Regional to add 739 dwelling units and over 300,000 ~uare feet of commercial use. There is no INTRODUCTION TO SCAG REVIEW l:~,OC'F.~g core, ancillary, a.qd bridge. The Cxtowth Management (adopted ,Tune 1994), Regional Mobility (adopted une Air QuaUty (adoped October 1995), a=,-=dous Waste Man ement (adop d November 1994), and Water Quality (adopted January 1995) chapters constitute the core chapters. constitute the base oo which local g~ ~mme coremracy of their plans with applicable Ancillary chapt~ are those on the ~my, Housing, Human Resources and Services, Finance, Open Space and Cxmservafion, Water R_-__,-~,c~___, Faaergy, and Integl-amd Solid Waste Management. These cl~ters address important issues facing the region and may reflect other regional plans. Ancillary chapters, however, do not contain actions or policies required of local government. Hence, they are entirely advisory and establish no new mandates or policies for the region. Bridge chapters include the Strategy and Implementation chapters, functioning as links between the Core and Anc/lhry ~apters of the RCI~. Each of the applicable policies relaled to the proposed project are identified by number ano relyreduced below in italics followed by SCAG staff comments ~garding the consistency of the project with those policies. q¢ A-2 Consistency With R~,ional Comprehensive Plan and Guide Policies I. The Growth Mana~,ement Chapter (GMC) of the Regional Comprehenxive Plan contains a number of policies ~ are particularly applicable ta the Edison ROW Project a. Core Growth Managgrnent Policies 7he population, housing, and jobs forecasts, which are adopted by $CAG's Regional Council and that reflect local plans and policies, shall be used by $CAG in all phasez of implementation and review. SCAG ~ff comm~ntn. As SCAG has d~i~ subrq15ona, th~ pwj~'t ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ ~ ~o A~a~ ~~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e 4.3-19 ~w~ ~ ~e ~~ ~~t ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~t 1 ~ ~ ~ of 2,~ ~le ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~t ~ ~ ~'s ~ ~ ~ SCAG. ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ R~ ~. ~ 3.03 The timing, financing, and location of public facilities, utility systons, and transportation systems shall be used by SCAG to implement the region's growth policies. and solid was~) and translxa~km gna~ms. We a~ urabl~ to ~ wlmh~ the S b. dndllary Growth Management Policies 3.04 Encourage local ~urmtiaio~' efforts to achie~ a balance between the types of jobs they seek to anmct and housing prie~. SCAG s~ff commen~. No information is ta~sented in the Draft grR on the City of Ratw~ Cucamonga's efforts to achieve a balance betweea types of jobs they seek to atwaet and housing prices. We a~ unable to de~mine whether the Project is supportive of this andllary RC:PG policy. 3.05 Encourage pittterns of urban development and land use which reduce costs on infrastructure construction and make better use of ~cisting facilities. SCAG staff comments. The Draft EIR notes that Project would encourage development of areas adjacent to presaatly served develol:nnents and would redu~ the cost of infrastructure constructi~ The Project is sugfx~ve of this ancillary RCIn3 policy. 3.07 Support subregional policies that recognize agriculture as an industry, support the economic viability of agricultural activities, preserve agricultural land, and provide compensation for "1 A-2 3.11 3.12 3.14 3.15 property owners holding lands in greenbelt areas. SCAG staff comments: No/rfforma~on is presented m the Dra~ EIR on whether any of the ~ pwject sit~ i~,jocamd on prime agricultural l~nd. We are unable to determine whether the Project is supportive of this andlhry RCPG policy. ,.~ /Encourage subregions to define an economic strategy to maintain the economic 'ixaliry of the subregion, including the dev~tmw. nt and use of marketing programs, ana other econon~c incenriw. s, wha:h sttppon artai~ of subregional goals and policies. SCAG staff commmt~. No information is pmsenttd in the Dra~ EZR on local or subregional plans for the Project area that In~Smt an economic strategy to maintain the economic vilality of the ~. We ax~ unable to dettxmine whether the Project is delivery, and efforts to stw. k new stnar~ of funding for ~ and the pro~on of services. St~ p~ and ~___snt~ ovasad by local ju~t.~ to attn~ homing growOt in job rich subreg~,s and ~ tnn~ in ~ sa~eg~ Encourage ~ or propo.~ local j~' progra~ aimed at designing land uses SCAf~ ~-~aff comments. Air quality mitigation ramsure 4.3.4B encourages the use of TDM meastu'~ in the design of commeax/al land us~. The Project is supportive of this ancillary Support local ~unsdictions' to establish mixed-use clusters and other transit-oriented developments around transit stations and along transit corridors. 3.16 3.18 3.19 3.20 3.21 Encourage developments in and around activity centers, transportation node corridors, underuri 'la~ infrastructure systems, and areas needing recycling and redevelopmen:. '- "1 SCAG Staff comment.~. The Draft glR r~erencea the poumtial for mixed land use~ along the Edison corridor, including us~ which are supportive of public transit. The project is10 also a good example of the development of axeas needing recycling and redev:'c~omeat. Encourage planned development in locx~ns least likely to cause adverse environmental SC. AC, ~f comments. The Draft t/IR addnases efforts to 'minimize and mitigau~ against ~ i adverse envinmmenral impa~ regarding drainage, Waffic, air quality, noise, public 11 scmc~__, agsthe~visual, biological and cultural resources. The Project is supportive of Support policiex and actions that preserve open space area~ identified in local, state, and federaJ pans. SCAC, s~,ff comment,. Th~ Draft ~ acknow__u~_ges that the project ~ is identified as Utility conittn'/opm ~ on 'ma~in~ kx:al lalam. Almnmive 2 (Open Space lark Greenbelt and Trail~ S~ Aimami~) ia a loo:al alm'nafiv~ 8ivm the tamfi~xuafion and si~ of the pmje~ This almamiv~ is admow~ a~ ~ mvimnnm~m!ly SUlXa'ior to 12 the ~topos~l Project and simuid be ~iven due ceo6d,,~,i~ by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Project is not supportive of this ancillary RCPG policy. If Alternative 2 Support the proreckon of vital re~ourc~r such as wetla~, groundwater rexbarge areas, woodlands, prod, n't~on lands, and land containing unique and endangered plants and aninuals. contribmz to the m~-going 1os~ of coastal sage scrub habilat m ~he telport, including habitat for various semifive ~ including the San Bemaxdino lvleariam's kangawo rat and the 13 California gnatcatcher. No mitigation meanurea are ~, although the Draft FIR acknowledges the potential for parti~il~ion in the San Bernardino Valley Multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan. The Project ia not $Ul:Sx)rdve of this ancillary RCPG policy. Encourage the implementation of measures aimed at the prmervarion and protectwn of recorded and,.unrecorded cultural rmource. s and archaeological s~tes. SCAG s~ff comments. The Draft EIR acknowledges that no archeological ~ites have been identified on the pwject ax~ and ~ mitigation rneasux~ ahould xite~ be detmmmaed 14 during the development prcc_e~s. The Project is supportive of this ancillary RCPG policy. I A-2 3.22 3.24 3.27 D~scourage development, or encourage the use of specia2 de. sign requirements, in areas steep slope. s, high fire, flood, and seismic hazards. SCAG s!afftr~mments. The Draft EIR includes a complete d.r-dnage study of the area and concludes that no adverse impacts are anticipated. The Project is supportive of th/s 15 ancillary RCPG policy. 1 Encourage min'garion measures that reduce noise in certain location& rneamres armed at preservation of biological and ecological resources, measures that would reduce exposure to seismic hazards, minimize earthquake damage, and to develop emergency rmt~nse and SCAG staff commentn. The Draft EIR includes mitigation mm.sures for the identified 16 Encourage efforts of local jurisdictions in the bnpltonentation of prograrns that increase the supply and quality of housing and provide affordable housing as evaluated in the Regional Housing Needs Ass~. SCAG staff comments. The Project arm in the Draft gl'R has not been aqse,sett as to its 17 Support local jurisdictions and other setn&:e .pro~.r$ ~. their effo.?, to_ ~d~_p_. .. _s~__~_~ such as: public education, housing, health care, social services, recreational facilities, law enforcement, and fire protecao~ SCAG staff comm~ntq. The Draft EIR in Chap~r 4.5 (Public Sea'vices) appropriately 18 addmasm the provision of __~ry facilities and services. The Proj~mt is sugportive of this 2. The g,~ioval Mobility Cba0tm' ~MC3 also has policies, all of which are corn, that tmna/n to the t~toposr. d pmjec't. This clapmr links the goal of sustaining mobility with the goals of fosmring economic development, mhanc:ing the environment, reducing ~n~rgy consumption. promoting nansporlation-fri_m~ily development patrams, and encouraging fair and ~xluitabl¢ access to rmidents affected by socio-economi¢, g~ographic and commercial limitations. Among the relevant policies in this chapter ar~ the following: Tran~orlation Demand Management and Regional Transit Program Policies 4.01 Promote Transportation Demand Management programs along with transit and ridesharing facilities as a viable and de.virable pan of the overall program while recogn~ng the particular needs of individual subregions. 4. 03 Support the extension of TDM program implementation to non-commute trips for public and A-2 4.07 private seaor aczi,~'es. S~porr th~ coordination of land use and transportation decisions with land use and transportation. capacitY, taIang into accoam the potera'ai for demand management strtuegies to mitigate travel demand if provided for as apart of the entire package. Support efforts to educate the public on the effw. x~ of donand management strc,oeies and increase the use of alternative transponation~ Public transportation programs should be considered an essential public service because of their social, economic, and environmental benefits. SCAG staff eommentn. See staff comment on SCAG policy 3.12. The Project is consistent with these five RCPG policiea. Rcgic~,l Str~etn and Nighways Prog~m Policies 4.20 ~ ~n~on ~ ~g~ ~ ~ ]~°~ ~ ~ e~ourag~. 4.~ ~M ~~ ~ug~ ~ region s~l M ~~ ~ng j~o~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ F'~ ~m ~ 4.2.1A ~ B ~ 4.2.2 Rcgiov:~l Non-Motori~'~ Tran,f~n~tion ~m Policies 4.25 The development of the regional tmnsporua'a~ system should include a non-motorized rrmt~nation system that provides an effective alternative to auto tra~ for appropriate trips. The planning and development of tram~rtation projects and systems should incorporate the following, as appropriate: a o Provision of sttfe, convenient, and continuous b~ and ~an infrawnaxure to and throughout areas with ~ and potenaal demand such as activity areas, schools, recreational areas (including those areas served by trails), which will ultimately offer the same or better accessibility provided to the motorized vehicle. b o Acce. xsib'dity to and on transit (bus terminals, rail stations, Park-And-Ride signif .anay ae ed. c o Maintenance of safe, convenient, and continuous non-motorized travel during and after the construa~on of transportation and general development projects. Existing bikeways and pedesm~ waldavays should not be removed without rnirigarion that is as effective as the original fac'diry. 19 2O _i A-2 4.27 Urban form, land use and s~te-de~ign poh'cies should include requirements for safe ~ convenien. r non-moro 'rued tramport. on, including the development of bicycle and SCAG staff comment-q. The Draft EIR addms~ the provision of trail linkages along the'"1 east side of Day Cn~..k Boulevard in Public S~a-vic~ mitigation measur~ 4.5.71)C. he21 3. The Air O-ality Chapter (AOC'~ cor~ action~ that ar~ generally applicable to project am as follows: 5.07 Determine specific programs and aamciated actions needed (e.g., indirect source rides, enhanced use of telecommunications, provtdon of conmna~ based shuttle services, provision of demand management based programs, or vehicle-mile. s-traveled/emission fees) so that options to command and control re~ can be a.~e.~ed. 5.11 StAG stnff comments.. No information is presented in the application on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's efforts to addr~ the various new technology and tmnsIxa~ation demand management strategies referenced in this policy in the Project area and surrounding 22 vicinity, with the ~on of ger~ral TDM measures referenced under SCAG policy 3.12. ~ We are urnhie to ~zrmine ~ the Project is comis~t with this RCPG policy. Through the envi~ ~ ~view prot~, ertllite that plans at all level., of gove~ (regh~!, a~r ba~, ~ty, .latbregh~nal and local) consider a~r quaiBy, land growth fot~cam into the uan~oa and air ~ mo~lin! fo~ the, Pmj~:t a~a and 23 24 _1 administrative impediments to increased use of wastewater should be mtrtressed. SCAG s~ff comments, The Project fails to acldre&ses the use of rectah-ned ~ater w~thJ_n the project area !~ surwtmding environs. We are unable to determine whether the Project is consistent with this RCPG policy. 25 Ensure wastewater treatment agency facility planning and facility development b~ ~.onsistent with population projections contained in the RCPG, while taking into account the need to build wastewater treatment faaiIities in cost-effeative increme~ of capacity, the need to build well enough in advance w reliably meet unanticipated service and storm water demands, and the need to provide standby capacity for public safety.and environmental protection objeatives. ~i SCAG ~ff comments. The Pwject hih to addresses the adequacy of wastewater facility planning and tl~ u.~ of RCI~ growlh foRx:a~ within tl~ pmj~::~. ar~a or aurmunding 26 policy. .~J lb/ A-2 Conclusions and Recommendations: O) As noted in the staff comments, the proposed Project is consistent with or supports a number of the.core and ancillary policies in the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide. The application lacks sufficient infmmafion to assess the environmental impacts and consistency with many of the noted regional plan policies. (2) 27 28 A-2 SO~ CALIFOR. NIA ASSOCIATION OF CrOVERNM~-NTS Roles and Authorities THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVF..RNMENT$ is · Joint Power~ Agency established under California Government Code Section 6502 el seq. Under f~detal and ~a~ law, the Association is dasi~na/zd as · Council of Governments (COG), a Regional Tinaston planning Agency fit~." ~ ~. and · Metrolmlimu plan,,i,~g Organization (MPO). Among its other maudsad wles aud mspomibilities, the Association is: · D~gnated by the fadm'al gov~unmt as ti~ Region'$ M~tropolitan PianMng Organization and mandsu~i to marne·in · continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive tram~rtation pimmmg prcc~ resulting in · Reguonal Tmmpormtion Plan and · Regional Trampormhon Improvement Program pursuaut to 23 U.$.C. §134(g)-(h), 49 U.$.C. §1607(f)-(g) et seq., 23 C.F.R. ~450, ami 49 C.F.R. ~613. The Associati.on is also the designarecl Regional ~rtation Planning Agency, and as such is mspomible for both preparation of the Regional Trampor'on Plan fitTP) ami Regioml Trompore·on lmpmvmamt Program fitTIP) urntar California Govammmt Code S~aion 65080. · Respomible for developing the demographic projec~ons and the iategr-_~__-~_ lind use, housing, employmeat, and transpormfon programs, mea~ares, and strategias portiota of tl~ ~o~h Corm Air {~aaltty Management Plan, pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 40460(b)-(c). The Association is also designated under 42 U.$.C. §7504(a) as · Co-l.~ad Agency for air quality p~,,ming for the Central Coast and Southeast Desert Air the Seam Implennenmtion Plan, pursuant to 42 U.$.C. ~7~6. · Respomibla, pursmnt Io California Government Code .~ction 65089.2, for reviewing all Congestion Management Piatu (CMP$) for con.~.~ency w/th reg/ona/~nation p/atu r~!mred by Section 65080 of the Govm'nment Coda. Tl~ A~ociation mina also ~valuam tim co~-i~,e~cy and compatibility of such progr-,~ witlan the region. · The authorJaM mgimml agnmcy for Inter-Governmental Review of Programs proposed for fMeral financial · .,a~,,nce and ~ davelopumat amivities, purnmat to Prmidential Execmive Order 12,372 (mpiacmg A-95 Review). · Res~:msible for reviewing, pursuant to Sections 15125(b) and 15206 of the CEQA Guidelines, Environmental lmpa~ R~portt of projects of regional significance for consistracy with regional plans. · The ·uthorized Ar~awide Waste Treatment Managen~nt Planning Agency, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §1258(a)(2) (Section 208 of ti~ FM~-ral Wa~r Pollution Control Act) · Responsible for preparation of the Regional Houring Need.~ At~et~rmtnt, pursuant to California Governmeat Coae Secaon 65584(~). · Rea~ble (along with the San Diego Association of Governments and the Santa l~arbam County/Cities Arm plan,,ing Council) for preparing the ~outhem C. aliforn~ Hazardous Wazle Management Plan pursuant to Califorma Health and Safety Code Section 25135.3. RESPONSE TO LE'I2'ER A-2 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 1. '.Comment noted. As noted by SCAG, the timing and location of public facilities is not possible at this time because there is no development propos~I oro- posed. At the time a de~lopment proposal is processed for the pro}oct site, the timing, financing, and location of public facilities will be deter- mined. The Traffic Report was prepared to meet the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) requirements under the Congestion Management Plan. This report includes fair share costs for roadway improvements that is in compliance with regional plans and polices of SCAG. The Traffic Study has been accepted by SANBAG. The City's General Plan Housing Element Policy 6:1 promotes efforts to provide 30 percent of the persons employed in the City with housing oppormmties. Program 6.A. 1 encourages the location of new business and industry in the City through promotional activities and through removal of governmental constraints on development. The proposed general plan amendments provide an opportumty for a variety of hous- ing types to be constructed in close proximity to a regional commercial area~ Also ref~ to l~$po~lse to Comment A-2.6 that discusses the eco- notalc viability of a propo~-d proje~x in an ~ 4. Comment noted. The project site is not located on prime agricultural land. Please refer to Appendix A Notice of Preparation, pages 9 and 10 of the two Imtial Studies for the proposed project The Initial Study states... "the project site is located in an open space corridor desi~xmted for use as an electri- Cld transmission lille comdor. The site is not presently used for agricul- tural purposes..." The purpose of the Initi~ Study is to determine whether a proposed project would have potentially si~lificrmt physical effects on the environment. The Imtial Study is used to focus the EIR on the potential significant effects and allows the Lead Agency to avoid ullllecessary analysis on those effects that are not potentially sigrlificant (CEQA Guidelines Section 15063[c][3]). The City has focused the EIR on those impacts that were determined in the Initial Study to be poten- tially significant. Section 2.4 on page 2-2 in the Draft EIR identifies the potentially significant impacts of the proposed project discussed in the EI1L Effects found not to be significant, as determined in the Initial Study are identified in Section 2.5 on page 2-5 of the Draft EIIL Geol- ogy and soils were determined to not have a potentially significant effect on or from the proposed project; therefore, the analysis of the proposed project on agricultural soils was not carned forward in the EI1L This policy. is not appropriate at a project specific level. The proposed project is providing the opportumty for the development of residential 2/6/980R:\CRG7½OWEI~',RESPTOCO WPD) 17 inc 10. 11. 12. and commercial land uses. The general plan amendments also provide for regional commercial development. The land use amendments would have a positive effect on the economic viability of the City: how- ever, a fiscal analysis for the proposed amendmen~ has not been pre- -,paced, or is necessary. for the EIK CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(f) states ..."economic and social changes resulting from a proiect shall not be treated as significant effects on the environment. Economic or social changes may be used, however, to determine that a physical c~,ange shall be regarded as a significant effect on the environment .... "':he economic viability of a project is not a purview of the EIR and therefore, was not addressed. Comment noted. The City's General Plan Housing Element Policy 6:1 promotes efforts to provide 30 percent of the persons employed in the City with housing opportunites. Program 6.A. 1 encourages the location of new business and industry in the City through promotional activities and through removal of governmental constraints on development. The proposed general plan amendments provide an opportunity for a v-aciety of hous- ing types to be constructed in dose prczzimity to a regional commercial area. Mitigation measure 4.5.2(2) further facilitate the relationship between housing and commercial (job) centers by providing trail sys- tems that link the two. It ca~ not be expected that each project that is processed through a local jurisdiction cam provide both an equal amount of job~ and homing to meet the 'ffuisdiction's jobs/housing balance. This is a policy that is better implemented at the General Plan level. Comment noted. Comment noted. Comment noted. Comment noted. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(d)(4), the ErR shall identify the environmentally superior alternative among the alternatives. The Lead Agency also must discuss why an alternative has been eliminated as not feasible. The Draft ErR on page 6-14 dis- cusses why this alternative is not feasible. There are economic impacts to the City with the implementation of Alternative 2 Open Space Pack Greenbelt Trails S.vstem Alternative. If the site is to be converted to a open space/irails system, the City would have to 1) purchase the prop- erty, 2) construct the ~ system, and 3) provide long-term mainte- nance of a trail system on the 84.15-acre site. The cost to purchase the property, and construct and maintain the trails may cause an additional financial burden on the City residents depending on how the City chooses to provide funding. In light of Proposition 218, additional use taxes would have to go to City wide vote. Long-term funding for a City trail system on this site is not certain. 2/6/98 (R: \C'~G -y50~-EIR'~rS IvFOCO WPD) 18 L.[A A.isoc~ates, Inc 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. It is the conclusion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, due to the poor quality. of coastal sage scrub habitat on the site, the project will not result in significant impacts to this habitat type. In addition, due to the poor quality of habitat and the distance and fragmentation of the ~.,site from the North Etiwanda Preserve and surrounding buffer lands, it is the conclusion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the project has no impact on the viability of biological resources and will not preclude long-term preservation plannm$. Therefore, it is concluded that ,~itiga- tion measures are not warranted for the loss of coastal sage scrub lxom the site. Also refer to response to U.S. Fish and W'dttlife Service Letter A- 3, responses 1, 2, and 3. Comment noted. Comment noted. Comment noted. The project's consistency with SCAG policy 3.24 is not appropriate at the project specific level. The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Housing Element contains the appropriate housing policies. The provi- sion for providing affordable housing is addressed in the City's Housing Element. The proposed project is a general plan amencl_ment to a vari- ety of housing deazaities and re~ion~ commeax:ial uaes in an area that is ~-~-,~ a$ a utility corridor. Since tbe C. Aty is not approvi~ a d~A- opment p, ovasr' for this at~ at this time, the pro.ion for affordable housing is p,e,m~tare. Please ~ ~o the City'n General Plan Housing Element and the City's ~ent Cod~ ~aich ~mcour~e a wide range of housing types, including single and multi-f~nfly, r~ntal and owne~h'?. Th~ provision for affordal~ bo~,'~n~ is bein$ implemented by the Cities Redm, elopm~t Asency which Ires an adopted Housing Production Plato At such time as a dev~ !,eopos'~r~ is submitted to the City for review and approval, the provision for affordable housing could be pursued with the developer. Comment noted. Comment noted. Comment noted. Comment noted. This policy is best served at the City General Plan level and not a project specific level. However, the ErR has identified mitigation measures · under Air Quality, Section 4.3 that implement programs supported by the City to reduce air quality impacts of the proposed project. Please refer to mitigation measure 4.3.1B, 4.3.1E, and 4.3.4B in the Draft EI1L The following two mitigation messures have been added to the Final EIR under Section 4.3, Air Quality to further reduce the impacts of the proposed project on air quality. 2/6/98 (R: ~RG730Xlq~RX!~SPTOCO WPD ) 19 ~ A~soc~,~tes, ln~ 23. 24. 25. 26. "4.3.4C The project proponent shall determine with the CiO' and the electrical purveyor if it is feasible to pre-wire houses for electrical charges for EV cars and/or optic fibers for home offices. If feasibI¢. install EV charges ardt/or optic-fibers per the electr:cal purveyor's direc- %tion prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 4.3.4D. Install EV charges or electrical fuel stations/natural gas for community wide use at key commercml and public location(s) m,-h as park and ride lots, Metrolink Station, and ~ercial centers." Comment noted. Comment noted. Refer to response to Comment A-2.5 and A-2.25 for the discussion on the use of the Initial Study to focus the £IR and determine which im- pacts of the proposed project are potentially significant. Both Initial Studies determined that the proposed project would not have a signifi- cant impact on water supply and, thereatore, the impact analyais for water use was not carried further in the EI1L Section 2.5 on page 2-7, discusses the project's impam on water. At the time development is proposed, the developer would comply with all the conditions of ap- proval by the water purveyor which may include the use of reclaimed water for landscaping purposes. The proposed project is not proposing a ~rastewazer treatment plant. This policy nders to the planning of facilities by v,-astewater treatment agenoes. However, to clarify the comment, the lmtial Study prepared for the proposed general plan amendments (contained in Appendix A of the Draft EIR,) and circulated with the Notice of Pr~am=ation for an EIR on the proposed project, discusses the project impacts on the wastewater system which was determined to be not significant. Because the project's impacts on wastewater facilities was determined not to be significant, the impact analysis of the proposed project on wastewater was not carried forwn~ in the Ell{ (refer to the discussion on the pur- pose of the Imtial Study in response to comment A-2.5 above). Furthermore, effects found not to be significant, as determined in the Initial Study, are identified in Section 2.5 on page 2-5 of the Draft EIR. Page 2-8 of the Draft EIR states...'q'he closest of these is Regional Plant 1 (RP-1) in the City of Ontario. This facility currenfiy treats approximately 34 million gallons per day, but has a capacity to treat 44 million gallons per day upon final expansion of the facility. CBMWD is also in the process of building Regional Plant 4 (RP-4) which is anticipated to be operauonal in 1998 or 1999. RP-4 is planned to be located on Etiwanda ,Avenue to the east of the project site between San Bernardino Avenue and Arrow Highway. This plant will have a first phase treatment capac- ity of 7 million gallons per clay. Either of these facilities could serve the project site dependent on project phasing; however, RP-1 would be the most likely treatment facility." Also refer to Comment Letter A-1 from 2/6/98 (R \CRG 730q- ~LR~R.ESPTOC O W'PD) 20 Inc 28. the Chino Basin Municipal Water Dtsmct which is the agent3.' that would service this site. Comment noted. SC~G staff has identified various polices of the Re- '4gional Comprehensive Plan and Guide for which the proposed proiect is not consistent. Refer to response to comments A-2.1, -2, -3, - 5, -6, 43, -12,-13, -17, -22, -25, and-26. In accordance with AB 3180, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan is provide~a m Appendix K of the Final EIIL 2/6DS(R: \CRG730kFEIRkRESlrl"OCO WPD) 21 United States Department of the FISH-k.\'D ',\'iLDLiFE SERVICE Ecoio2'.zai Se~'~css C~::sbac 2730 ~g~r ,Avenu~ Carlsbad, California 92008 Ms. Nancy Fong City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive, P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Interior Environmental Impact Report General Plan Amendments 96-03B & 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96-01 & 97-01/Edison Company (SCH# 97071043) Dear Ms. Fong: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the above referenced document, received by our office on November 17, 1997. We provide the following comments in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (as amended), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, and the Memorandum of Understanding for the Purpose of Developing and Implementing a Habitat Conservation Plan to Conserve Wildlife and Plant Species of Concern in the San Bernardino Valley. The Service f'mds that the ultimate development allowed by the proposed project is likely to have significant impacts to biological resources. We, therefore, recommend mitigation measures to offset future impacts to biological resources and reduce biological impacts to a level below significance. The proposed project is to fezone an 84.15 acre linear set of parcels from a designation of utility corridor to various Commercial and Residential designations. The proposed project area is a north-south oriented strip approximately 330 feet wide by 10,756 feet Ions, running parallel to the Day Creek channel between Highland Avenue and Interstate 15. The area is on the alluvial fan complex formed by Day Creek and a number of other streams that flow from the San Bernardino National Forest, although the charmelization of Day Creek along the proposed project area has altered the active hydrology typical of alluvial fan formations. The biological resources on site include three patches of sage scrub totaling about 50 acres, abandoned vineyards, and ruderal habitat. The sage scrub within the proposed project area was historically Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub (AFS), a habitat type designated by the State of California as S 1.1 (most sensitive). Habitat disturbance and hydrological modifications have led to a sage scrub community that resembles the more generalized Riversidean sage scrub. However, fioristic elements of AFS, -1 J Ms. Nancy Fong such as scale broom (Zc.~idos?:rrum squ:m::h'm), remain ~ components of the sage scrub habitat in the proposed.project area. The habitat is likely suitable for both coastal California gnatcatcher (PoIioptila californica californica; gnatcatcher) and San Bernardino kangaroo Rat (Dypodomys merriami parvus; SBK.R), although neither were detected during recent surveys for this project. In 1994, SBK.R was detected near the project area, and gnatcatchers were c~_*erved within the North Etiwanda Preserve approximately one mile to the north. Contiguous suitable habitat exists between the locations of these sightings and the proposed project area. Although the proposed rezoning would not directly remove these biological resources, it is presumed that the development allowed by this rezoning would remove all of the biological resources within the project area. No mitigation is offered to offset these impacts to biological resources. 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga, the County of San Bernardino, and 11 other local jurisdictions have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to cooperate in the development of a Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan for the San Bernardino Valley (MSHCP). One of the keystones of the preserve design anticipated under the MSHCP is the North Etiwanda Preserve. a 762 acre area of diverse AFS and other sensitive habitats. This preserve is nested within a larger area of sensitive habitat, much of which must be conserved to maintain biological viability in perpetuity, and to assure the long term protection of species proposed to be covered under the MSHCP. The proposed project area is a contiguous southward extem. !on of tl?'s. key. habl .tat.ar~a. Eventual build. out of the proposed project area, and other projects w~ttt cumulauve mapacts to regional habitat values, mint be considered significant, and mitigated and implemented so as to assure the viability of the preserve system. The MOU establishes interim review guidelines for projects proceeding while the MSHCP is under development. The draft EIR recommends that early project review pursuant to the interim project review guidelines be held at the stage of development proposals. The Service, however, maintalin that this rezoning provide~ a good opportunity. to begha proactive planning for the development allowed by this change in de~i8!aafion. Appropriate mitigation for the indirect and cumulative impacts of the rezoning, that al~ addre~e~ the direct iml:~e~ by the subsequent development of the project area can be achieved by mitigation banking. Alternatively, a deed restriction could be placed on appropriate biologically semifive lands supporting AFS habitat. The Service recommends that the Edison Company establish a mitigation bank, by conserving an area configuous with the North Etiwanda Preserve, into which subsequent developments would be required to buy their fair share. At minimum, this bank should be sized and configured to allow adequate opportunity for mitigating impacts to the proposed project area. Additional bank lands could serve to provide mitigation opportunities for other projects in the region. This banking process could be structured so as to transition stainlessly into the MSHCP during the implementation phase. An appropriate mitigation bank or deed restriction should be described and commirted to in the Final EIR for the proposed project. 1 3 lib Ms. Nancy Fong The Ser~'ice looks forward to furuher discussing possible land configurations ~d details of the mitigation measures. j..f you have any questions regarding these comments. please con:act Scox Eliason of my staff at (760) 431-9440. Sincerely, Gall C. Koberich Field Supervisor HC-1-6-98-88 Bill Tippets, CDFG Glenn Black, CDFG Randy Scott, Stu Bernardino Coungt Plumins Kim Gould, Southern California Edison /// ~ Assooates. Inc RESPONSE TO LET'~.R A.3 United States Department of tbe Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service ~As is stated in the biological assessment and in the biological resources section of the EIIL the coastal sage scrub present on the site is probably remnant alluvial fan sage scrub. However, the coastal sage scrub is relatively poor m quality compared to this sort of habitat and alluvial scrub in the are~ Vegetative diversity of the coastal sa~e scrub is low, it is dominated almost exclusively by a single species of shrub, California buckwheat. The entire site likely was once alluvial fan sage scrub that ~ cleared or impacted in some other way, such that only buckwheat, a species tl~t readily colo.nizes disturbed sites, is nearly the sole species present. The quality of the remaining coastal sage scrub is further diminished by its ~ented distribution on the site. habitat is present m three disjunct patches occupying 4.2, 12.8, and 55.6 acres, respectively. Further, the habitat is not contiguous with other coastal sage scrub in the r~ion. Ro~lw'a~, a~icultural land uses, and developed ar~s ~eparate the site from other nr~ts of coastal sage scrub in the reipon that are located prmmrily to the north of the site. Although the coastal sage scrub on the site may be suitable habitat for the coastal California gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino kangaroo rat, neither species was detected on the site during recent focused surveys for each species, as the U.S. Fish and ~Wddllfe S4~vice noted. It was, therefore, concluded that both species are absent frotn the site. Due to the low quality of the ~nant coastal sage scrub habitat and the absence of the coastal Calfforn~ gnatcatcher and San Bernardino kanga- roo rat, and any other species listed as threatened or endangered, it was conducted that the 1o~ of coastal sage scrub from the site does not constitute a significant impact. This conclusion is based on the thresh- olds of significance listed m the EIR specifically, the project will not "substantially affe~ a rare or endangered species of plant or animal or the habitat of the species' nor will the project substantially diminish habitat for ~ wildlife, or plants. The EIR did conclude that the loss of coastal sage scrub from the site is a cumulative impact. The North Etiwanda Preserve is approximately 2 miles from the north- ernmost end of the project site. Habitat may be contiguous in the area surrounding the preserve; however, it is not contiguous with the coastal sage scrub on the proiect site. Highland Avenue, a major east-west arterial roadway forms the northerly boundary of the project site and ft-agments the site from habitat that may be contiguous with the pre- serve. Habitat fragmentation is one of the factors discussed above (re- sponse to comment 1) and in the EIR providing a basis for the conclu- sion that project impacts to coastal sage scrub are not significant. Therefore, mitigation for the loss of coastal sage scrub is not required. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOLD, signed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to cooperate in the development of a Multi-Species 2/6/98 (R:\CRG 730~- I:aatq~aSPTOCO .wPD ) 25 L~ A~so~a~es, inc Habitat Conser~'ation Plan (MSHCP) for the San Bernardino Valley does establish interim review guidelines for projects proceeding while the MSHCP is under development. The interim project review guidelines state that the recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Setrace are -advisory; the final decision of whether to approve, modify, or deny a project remains in the hands of the lead agency (in this case, the City of Rancho Cucamonga) pursuant to existing laws. The roterim review guidelines state that each lead agency shall determine whether a p~oject shall be reviewed pursuant to the guidelines. Further, the lead aget,.3~ retains the discretion to determine that a project within the plan area, because of the project's characteristics, has no impact on the viability of biological resources and would not preclude long-term preservation planning. It is the conclusion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, due to the poor quality of coastal sage scrub habitat on the site, the project will not result m significant impacta to this habitat type. In addition, due to the poor quality of habitat and the distance and fragmentation of the site from the North Etiwanda Preserve and surrounding buffer lands, it is the conclusion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the project has no impact on the viability of biological resourc~ and will not preclude 1ongrtcrm preservation planning. Therefore, it is concluded that mitiga- tion measures including those recommended by the U.S. Fish and Wild- life Service (i.e., mitigation bank or deed restriction) are not warranted for the 1o~ of coastal ~ acx, ub f~m the site. 2/6/98 ('R: \CRG '~30WE~WA?.S PTOCO.xgrl~D) 26 1/..5 SENT BY: R CUCAMONGA C0M DEV; 1- 8-98 1:19PM; 9094772847 TRANSPORTATION/FLOOD CONTROL DEPARTMENT- SURVEYOR 825 East Thtrd S~re~l - San Rernar0mo, CA 92415~835 * (9~) 387-=8~ Janua~ 2, I~8 Nancy Fong AICP City of P, ancno Cucamonga, Planrang Dept. 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: 9097814277; ~3 '4 A-4 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY FOR THE DRAFT PROGRAM EIR - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA Dear Ms. Fong: Thank you for allowing the San Bernardino County Transportation/Flood Control Department to review the aOove referened document. Our comments are as follows: The Flood Control District's Water Resources Division has no objection to the prcposed general plan amendment, The hydrology, as submitted, is generally in accordance with the 1986 San Bernardino County Hyclroiogy Manual and the resulting Q's appear reasonable. It appears that drainage is to be outletted into Day Creek Channel downstream of Victoria Park Lane approximately 1,200 feet from the site. Prior to any activity on Flood Control District right of way. a permit must be obtained through the Flood Control District's Field Engineenng Division. -1 J It does not appear from It~e information available at this time that the 96-inch RCP stubout, located approximately 462 feet from Victoria Park Lane, is adequate to convey the calculated peak Q of 776 cfs. The hydrology and hydraulics should be reviewed Drior to issuance of a permit. Should you have any questions please contact Gall Cotugna at (909) 387-2620. J Si0cerely, / GAlL COTUGNA, Senior Associate Planner Environmental Management D~vision G C CC. Jim Borcuk KAM/CLL Reacting Filo -98-98 13:18 RECEIVED FROH: P.83 RESPONSE TO LETTER A-4 County of San Bernardino Transportat'on/Flood Control Department Surveyor 1. % Comment noted. Comment noted. At the time a development proposal is proposed, the project proponent would be conditioned to obtain a permit fi-c~ the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for any activity on me Flood Control District right-of-way. This system is shown as Line 400-A on the City~s storm dram improve- ment plans for Community Facilities Dismet 91-1. Pe~ the drainage study prepared by Associated Engiheers for this project, this system carries 756 cffs from Day Creek Boulevat~ to an inlet approximately 180 feet east of Day Creek Channel, where the di$char~ increases to 776 cis, continues for another 523 feet, and inleta into the channel. Moat of this system is comprised of a 108-inch RCP, which tranaition$ to an existing 96-inch diameter RCP stub-out befor~ entering the channel. Detailed analysis using WSPGN hydraulie~ software reveals that the existing 96-inch RCP causes an unacceptable increase in the hydraulic grade line in the upstream (108-inch) reach. Hydrology data is pro- vided in Appendix I of the Final FIR. It is recommended that this exiat- ing pipe be t~noved and that 108.inch RC, P be uaed from Day Creek Boulevard to Day Creek Clmnn~ with the pipe entea. mg the channel 1 foot above the channel in~an. This would yield a pipe gradleto of 2.66 percent as oppo~ to the 2.00 percent ~awn on the propo~d plato, resulting in an acceptable hydraulic grade line. A mitigation measu~ has been added to the Drainage section 4.1, page 4.1.3 of the EIR as followa: "4.1.1C TI~ developer shall remove the existing 96-inch RCP stubout, 1ocat~l appmx-mmtely 462 feet from Victoria Park Lane and install a lOS-inch RCP from Day Creek Boulevard to Day Creek Channel, with the pipe entering tbe cbannel one foot above tbe channel invert. ' The addition of the mitigation measure does not change the impact analysis in the Draft EI1L 2/6D80~:\CI~G'r3OXI~IRXRESPTOCO WPD) 28 SENT BY: R CUCAMONGA COM DEV; 1- 8-98 1:19PM; 9094772847 t'ETF GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 140C TENT~ STR~T SACRAMENTC 9097814277; ~" A J L [' January 5, 19~8 ~1, R~nCt~6 ~ N~CY FONG CI'~ OF ~CHO L~C~ONGA COM~ITY DEVELOPME]~ DPT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ~CMO CUC~ONGA, CA 91730 Subject: G~ERAL P~N ~E~MENTS 96-03B~9'7-01 A~ Vi~ORIA CO, UNITY S~ fi: 970~1043 A-5 Dear NANCY FONG: The StaUe Clearinghouse submitted the above named environmental document Co selected s=ate agencies for review. The review Derled is closed and none of the state agencies have comments. This !etLer acknowledges =hat you have compiled with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for druf= environmental documents, ~uxnuant to ~he California ~nviro~n~al Quali~y Act. 9!~ cull at {916) 445-0613 if yo~t have any .~ueeclon~ regarding =he envirOnm~.ntal review process. When conCac=ing =he Clearinghouse in %his mercer, please usa rh~ eight-dig~t State C!earin~housz number so ~ha= we may rcspond promptly. Sincerely, AI4TERO A. R!V.a~P~ATA Chief, Scaue Cle&ringhousc //& 13:17 RECEIVED FROM:9~9a??28~7 P.82 SENT BY: R CUCAMONGA COM DEV; 1- 8-98 1:20PM; 9094772847 90978~4277; A-5 /17 8! -9D-9~ IS,: 18 PECEIVED FROH:D~g4-'W'72Bd-'7 I.~ Associates, Inc RESPONSE TO LETTER A-5 Governor's O~ce of Planning and Research %Letter A-5 from the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) does not require comment since its purpose was to inform the City that it has complied with the State EIR review requirements. 2/6D8 (~R: \CRG ?30Wl~i~W~.S PTOC O .W'PD) 31 SENT BY: R CUCAUONGA COB DEV; 2- 6-9@ 9:23AU; 9094772847 90978~4277; A-6 BOARD OF TI;li-I-.-c, Tr:'Fs 5GI?~"R[N'TE'~DENT ^,5,515TA,eI'T $LIP~RINTEHDENT ~ ~ \, ~,e,~. / November 21, 1997 RECEIVED NOV 2 4 City ot Rancho Cucamonga ~annn,~j Di~ion Ms. Nancy Fong, AICP City of Rancho Cucamonga Communrty Development Department Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: General Plan Amendments 96-03B & 97-01 and Victoria Communrty Plan Amenclmerrts 96-01 & 97-01/Edison Company Dear Ms. Fong: Thank you for Droviding Chaffey Joint Union High School Distnc, t with a copy of the Draft Environmental Report for General Plan Amenaments 96-03B & 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96-01 & 97-01/Edison Company. We have reviewed the Public Services section and support Doth the analysis and proposed mitigation measures comained therein. We urge the Planning Commission and City Council to support lhese proposed mitigation measure~. We appreciate the City of Rancho Cucamonga's ongoing commitment to quality sclqooJs. Sincerely, Susan B. Sundell, Ed.D Director, Business Servmes SBS.jm 1 RE~-,VED FROM :9994772847 //¢ P.tg~ RESPONSE TO LE2TER A-~ Cbaffey Joint Union High School District 1. '~Comment noted. 2/6/98 (R: XCI~G 730Xl- Ir.~',RF.S lrTOCO 33 -% EIR for GPA 96-03B & 97-01 and VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 MOU AND MSHCP INTERIM REVIEW GUIDELINES EXHIBIT "F" MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BY AND BETWEEN THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME, THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, THE FIFTEEN AFFECTED CITIES IN SOUTHWESTERN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AND ADDITIONAL UNDERSIGNED PARTICIPATING AGENCIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN"TO CONSERVE WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY. This Memorandum of Understanding (Memorandum)is made and entered into as of the date of signature by and among the. County of San Bernardino and the undersigned cities, state and federal agencies, other participating local agencies and public utilities. The signatories collectively are referred to as the "Participating Agencies."~ .The Participating Agencies for the purposes of this Memorandum are public utilities and those agencies that have local land use authority, are self-governing local agencies or are state or federal 'agencies with land management authority and/or jurisdiction over plant and animal species and natural habitats which are the subject of the Habitat Conservation Plan. WHEREAS, the governmental Participating Agencies are among the local governments, self- governing agencies, and state and federal agencies that have administrative responsibility or regulatory authority over lands within the planning area that are subject to Federal and State statutes including the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended, the California Endangered Species Act of 1984 (CESA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty ACt, the Federal Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act, state planning and zoning laws, and local ordinances, and, WHEREAS, these statutes direct the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service") and the California Department of Fish and Game ("Department') to conserve, protect, and enhance plant, fish, and wildlife species and their habitats from adverse effects resulting from public and private development and actions,, and, WHEREAS, the vadous statutes and sources of authority under which the Participating Agencies function do not empower any individual agency to implement a comprehensive, multi-agency program for long-term viability of species of concern, and, WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies recognize the need for comprehensive and coordinated protection of species of concern, and the need to integrate their responsibilities and authorities in a coordinated manner to ensure successful, timely, and mutually beneficial resolution of issues involving species of concern, and, WHEREAS, the state and federal agencies participating in this Memorandum will ensure that their regulatory decisions and land use practices will comply with state and federal environmental and endangered species statutes and regulations and that their management actions will promote appropriate use and protection of sensitive biological areas under their jurisdictions, and, MSHCP MOU-Revised 8-4-95 1 ~' ~,~ J WHEREAS, the local governments participating in this Memorandum will ensure that their land use decisions will comply with state and federal environmental and endangered species statutes and regulations and that their governing actions will promote appropriate use and protection of the areas identified as having important biological values in southwestern San Bernardino County under their jurisdictions while ~romoting sound decision making practices that attempt to balance the ecological and economic needs for the region, and WHEREAS, efforts to%coordinate conservation programs among local, State, and Federal agencies in California are exemplified by the signing in 1991 of The Agreement on Biological Diversity by twenty-seven Federal, State, and local agencies including the Burea,, of Land Management, the Service and the Department, and which Agreement provides a framework for collaborative conservation planning on a bioregional or local scale, and, VVHEREAS, biological resources are important to all citizens of San Bernardino County, including indigenous people and future residents, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed and understood that, 1.0 PURPOSFS OF MI=MORANr3UM The governmental Participating Agencies have administrative and/or regulatory responsibilities over species of concern in the southwestern San Bernardino County. They have voluntarily entered into this Memorandum for the following purposes: 1.1 To define their roles and responsibilities in the development and implementation of a San Bernardino Valley Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), 1.2 To develop a MSHCP that is consistent with the ESA, the CESA and the Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) program, and ensures conservation and protection of currently listed, proposed and candidate species and species of concern and their habitats within the designated plan area. The boundaries of the plan are described in Attachment A. The species proposed to be covered by the plan are enumerated in Attachment B. 1.3 To provide definition and certainty to the planning process prior to substantial investment of time and funding, and 1.4 To demonstrate a commitment to this process as the forum for a comprehensive approach to resolving land use and endangered species conflicts. 2.0 PURPOSFS OF THI::: PI AN It is agreed that the plan will be a coordinated multi-agency, multi-species conservation plan focusing on certain covered species within the plan boundaries. The purposes of the plan are: MSHCP MOU - Reviseci 8-4-95 2.1 Protection of Covered Species. To conserve and protect covered s12ecJes and the ecosystems on which they depend in perpetuity within southwestern San Bernardino County pursuant to the ESA and CESA. and not preclude recovery of listed species. 2.2 Provide E~uity in Rec~ulation. To provide a comcrehensive means to coordinate and standardize mitigation and com2ensation requirements so that puDlic and private actio.,ns will be regulated equaJl~ and consi expenses, and regulatory du,,lic.,,; ........ stently, reducing delays uncertainty in dewJ,,..,-"~'---- ~. o,u.... ~[ ~s intended that the nlan ,.,-'. A,:_:_ _~:' " ~'"~"'!¢ pr~va[e projects and will ~res~' ,- ..r,,~ a ~y~[em ~o er~...'-~ that the costs of compensation and mitigation are applied equitably to all. 2.3 Reduce Cumulative Fffects. To prescribe mitigation measures for private development and agency actions to lessen or avoid cumulative impacts to the covered species and eliminate, whenever possible, case-by-case review of impacts of projects when consistent with the mitigation and compensation requirements prescribed by the plan. 2.4 Incidental T~,ke Permit. To obtain the necessary permits or take authorizations from the Service and the Department to authorize the incidental take of listed species covered in the plan in connection with otherwise lawful activities within the area subject to the plan as provided by Section 10(a) of the ESA and Section 2081 of the CESA. 2.5 Conservation (Pre-listina) Agr,~rn~.nts. The MSHCP is intended to provide for the long term preservation of-covered species not currently listed as threatened or endangered pursuant to the ESA or CESA such that should they become listed, the Department and the Service shall, bardng "unforeseen or extraordinary" conditions, authorize incidental take for the species. To accomplish this, all non-listed species being considered under this plan will be treated as if they are already listed. 'Unforeseen or extraordinary- conditions shall be defined in the 'MSHCP and its Implementation Agreement, but such conditions, for the purposes of this MOU, are generally understood to be: (1) e, nvironmentai, demographic and/or genetic stochastic circumstances that were not and could not be anticipated during the preparation of the Plan, or (2) information developed dudrig MSHCP implementation monitoring that identifies consequences of MSHCP implementation procedures that may jeopardize the continued existence of the species. 2.6 Provide Oversight. Control Measures and Standards of Success. To establish a means in which the MSHCP will provide appropriate and successful methods of: (1) reporting; (2) accounting audits; (3) funding (short and long term); (4) periodic and independent biological evaluation; and (5) opportunities for adequate public Participation. MSHCP MOU - Revised 8-.4-95 3.0 HARITAT CONSt:RVATION Pl AN COMPONFNT~ 3.1 The Plan. The principal component of this effort is the preparation of a MSHCP. The plan will adopt and adhere to the best avaiIa~le information on or methods of conservation biology and identify listed and unlisted species to be covered in the plan. It will seek to minimize the threats that would lead to listing of presently unlisted species covered in the plan and identify a reserve system, financing and management v~ich are sufficient to conserve the covered species. The plan will include the developmer4t and analysis of appropriate biological data, an alternatives analysis that includes, but is not limited to, an alternative that would not res,_" in "take" of listed species and the reasons why not selected, the delineation of sensitive habitat areas supporting the covered species addressed in the plan, and the identification of a habitat preserve system that will support the continued existence of all species proposed to be covered in the plan. 3.2 Section 10(a) Permit and 7081 Take Authori:,~tion Applications. Applications for permits under Section 10(a) of the ESA and Section 2081 bf the CESA will be submitted to the Service and the Department when the dr. Af~, .~..i '-~p-~ssued. The plan will function as the MSHCP for the purpose of making tt~.~./~_~l~' applications. Plan implementation will be described in an accompanying Imp'lemer[l'tation Agreement. It is intended that the review and approval of the MSHCP by the Participating Agencies will satisfy the requirements of applicable Federal and State environmental law. It is the intent of the parties to eliminate project-by-project review of the effect of development activities on the Covered Species, to the full extent authorized by law, and to ensure that mitigation/compensation measures are not imposed beyond those detailed in the MSHCP for such development activities provided conditions under which the MSHCP was formulated have not significantly changed. Such a plan will satisfy the Federal and State agencies with respect to the protection of the Covered Species by, among other possible mechanisms, providing uniform and biologically viable mitigation/compensation measures for application to development activities. Such mitigation measures will be developed subject to the approval of Federal and State agencies. Individual landowners, groups of landowners, or development interests may choose to comply with the terms and conditions of the MSHCP affecting their proposed activities. Alternately, they may choose to prepare and submit their own conservation plan and Section 10(a) permit application when their activities may result in incidental take of federally listed species and, if State or local agency approval is required, they may choose to submit their proposal outside the existing conservation plan umbrella. 3.3 Implementation Agreement. The conservation plan shall be implemented through an enforceable agreement. The Agreement shall specify the operating parameters of the conservation plan for the San Bernardino Valley. The Agreement specifies the obligations, authorities, responsibilities, liabilities, benefits, rights, and privileges of all parties or signatories to the subject conservation plan to be prepared and submitted with the Section 10(a) permit and 2081 authorization applications. The Agreement shall also provide for expeditious issuance of Section 10(a) permits and 2081 authorizations for Covered Species not currently listed pursuant to the ESA or MSHCP MOU - Revised 8-4-95 CESA by incorporating "Pro-listing" commitments into the Agreement. It is intended that the Agreement will be entered into by all Participating Agencies approving the conservation plan, and any private party having an obligation or role in implementing the conservation plan. The Agreement will provide specific mitigation commitments for private parties and Public Agencies conducting otherwise lawful activities. and assurances by the Participating Agencies to ,orevent the imposition of inconsistent or overlapping mitigation/compensation requiremenus under any Federal, State, or local law. - 3.4 CFt3A AN~ NI:PA Compliance. Concurrent with preparation and rele,. ;~. of the draft and'final plans, a joint environmental review document will be prepared and released which will satisfy Federal and State requirements. 3.5 Decision. The acceptance of the plan, the CEQA and NEPA environmental documents and the Section 10(a) permit applications and the signing of an Implementation Agreement by the Service will result in the issuance of Section 10(a) permits, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the ESA, to the local agencies that are participants in the planning effort for the public and private lands involved. The acceptance of the plan and the CEQA environmental documentation and the signing of an Implementation Agreement by the Department will result in the issuance of 2081 take authorizations for the covered species that are adequately protected by the plan pursuant to the CESA to local agencies that are participants in the plan for the public and private lands involved. Other appropriate decision documents will be issued by the Participating Agencies. 3.6 Im91ement~fion. Following or concurrent with the issuance of the biological opinion, adoption of the plan, and receipt of the 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizations, the signatories .will revise their land use plans and policies to conform with the plan and the 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizations or withdraw from the program. Take authorizations may not be in effect until land use plans are amended. Should any participant withdraw from the program, it may adversely affect the plan area and covered species list and therefore may require appropriate modifications of the plan. The signatories will also ensure that future plans, policies, and actions will be in conformance with the plan and the Section 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizationS. Should the need adse to amend the plan in accordance with established procedures due to new information or the development of more effective management prescriptions or techniques, such amendment will occur through a cooperative effort involving the agencies and the public in the southwestern San Bernardino County that are subject to 10(a) permits and 2081 take authorizations or biological opinions that may have already I~een issued. 3.7 Conserwtion Strategy. The plan shall maximize the use of appropriate publicly-owned lands, comply with legally mandated conservation measures, and provide incentives for conservation of pdvate lands (land acquisition, density transfers, land swaps, tax incentives, mitigation banks, etc.). 3.8 Implementation Funding. The scope of the plan and any preserve system must take into account realistic, affordat21e funding sources. The plan snail be based upon tangible and affordable sources of funds and may provide for increased conservation if other local, state or federal funding becomes available. 4.0 ROLF OF THF PARTICIPATING AGPNCIFS 4.1 General Roles and ResDonsibitities. The County of San Bernardino shall act as the functional lead agency utilizing the assistance, support and cooperatic,,. '~f the cities and local agencies in preparation of the plan. The county, cities and local agencies shall have administrative responsibility for preparation and implementation of the plan. When and if a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) is established to facilitate and oversee the plan preparation or implementation, the lead responsibility shall pass to the JPA. Until a JPA is established for that purpose, a Coordinating Committee shall coordinate the preparation and implementation of the plan. The Coordinating Committee shall consist of a Chairperson appointed by the Board of Supervisors, one additional member appointed by the Board of Supervisors, one member appointed by each of the other signatory Participating Agencies, and additional persons appointed as follows. The Coordinating Committee may appoint additional persons to its membership, on such terms as it deems appropriate, who may include representatives of conservation organizations, industry, pdvate interest groups, and public volunteers. The Coordinating Committee shall provide for public involvement in plan preparation. The Service and the Department shall participate in the planning process by responding to work products and by providing direction on the acceptability of proposed habitat preserve designs and implementation mechanisms. 4.2 Assistance to the County. Each Participating Agency agrees to provide to the County, without cost to the County, the following information and assistance: (a) Data. All relevant information it possesses for the lands within its jurisdiction. (b) Technical Assistance. Staff and support to assist with the following planning tasks: (2) (3) (4) (5) Developing management prescriptions relevant to the land within its jurisdiction. Providing effective liaison with adjacent jurisdictions. Developing and Implementing a public participation program to ensure adequate public participation within its area of jurisdiction, as required by State Law or local ordinance. Preparing 10(a) permit and 2081 take authorization applications. Providing any other assistance and/or support as might be mutually agreed upon with the County. (c) Point of Contact. Designate, in writing, the name of the individual official(s) who will function as the primary agency contact for MSHCP M©U - Revised 8-4-95 5 /~ '7 coordination with the County. The names, addresses, phone numbers and af'fiiiations of these individuals are set forth in Attachment C. 4.3 Plan Conformance. In order to be a permittee, Participating Agencies will ensure that their land use plans and policies are revised to conform with the approved plan and the 10(a) permits and 2081 take author!zations, and any other a~plicaPte regional. state or federal resource management ~ians. 4.4 Plan Preparation, Funding. Funding for this plan will come from a variety of sources -- Participating Agency contributions, endowments from private or non-profit entities, matching grant programs such as offered by the National Fish anu '~ildlife Foundation, and other State and Federal funds such as those established by the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act, the Intermodel Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), Traffic Management Environmental Enhancement (TMEE) program and Land and Water Conservation Fund program. The Participating Agencies will also provide a fair share contribution to funding the plan preparation and implementation by allocating appropriate staff and support services. 4.5 Proposed Schedule. Signatories acknowledge that time is of the essence and hereby agree to make their best efforts to complete and obtain final approval of the plan by a target date of June 30, 1996. A timeline setting forth specific dates for the completion of each identified task necessary to complete the plan is contained in Attachment D. 4.6 I=nvironment~l Coml~li~nce. In recognition of the goal of achieving the timely preparation and approval of the plan, all Participating Agencies hereby agree that they will submit any and all comments on the appropriate environmental documentation on a timely basis, unless otherwise provided by law. 5.0 RO! I= OF THF COUNTY The County of San Bernardino agre,es to provide the following resources and to perform the following functions according to the funding mechanisms agreed to by the cities, local agencies, county and other interested parties: 5.1 I e~d Agency. Act as lead agency for the plan. As lead agency, the County will provide overall leadership and coordination among the Participating Agencies in the development of this plan. This includes functioning as Local Lead Agency in complying with the CEQ~ in conjunction with the Department and coordinating NEPA compliance in coordination with the Service. 5.2 Planning Team Personnel. Provide the pdmary members of the planning team. 5.3 Facilities F:quipment. and Supron. Provide office facilities to house the planning team and provide necessary support such as office machine supplies, etc. The County also agrees to provide automated support, such as word processing and geographic information system products directly or through contracts. MSHCP MOU - Revised 8-4-95 5.4 Data. Provide any relevant data in its possession for the use of the planning team and t~e Partici]~ating Agencies and secure additional data on public lands as needed to allcw completion of the plan ant encourage private landowner particisation. The County also agrees to participate in the analysis of the data and formulation of management prescriptions. 5.5 :;",~iic m,~'~;,-=~i~,, Assume i-'at, resconsio~lities for ensuring adequate public participation by,,affected parties and interests and actively seek overall public participation in the plann, ing effort. 5.6 Point of Contact. Designate, in wdting, the name of the person designated as the primary County contact for the planning effort. 5.7 Fndangered Species Acts. Submit the draft plan and draft environmental compliance documentation to the Service and the Department for analysis, review, and comments. The County will then submit final applications to the Service and the Department for review and processing. 5.8 Plan Preparation Funding. Funding for this plan will be as described in Section 4.4 above. As a Participating Agency, the County will also provide a fair share contribution to funding the plan preparation and implementation by allocating appropriate staff and support services. 6.0 ROII= Of THI::: U.S. FISH AND VVII !3! IFl= St=RVICI= AND THIF CA! IFORNIA 131=PARTMI:::NT OF FISH AN13 P-AM!::: 6.1 Technk-~i Assistance. Rioiogk'~i 13~t:a ~,nd Advice. The Service and the Department shall advise and make available all public information on the species and their habitats and shall agree to a final list of species and habitats to be addressed during the initial stages of plan preparation. The Service will also provide guidance on what constitutes the best available scientific and commercial information for the purpose of permit applications. 6.2 Intedm Work Product/~growi. The Service and the Department shall provide comments and guidance (in writing) on interim work products at major milestones in the planning process so as to contribute to an efficient, cost-effective MSHCP that is capable of being completed according to the schedule in Attachment D. The following actions are identified as major milestones for the purpose of this paragraph: (1) agreement on the proposed list of species to be covered in the plan, (2) agreement on the list of associated habitats or ecosystems, (3) agreement on scientific criteria for conducting field surveys and the format for compiling and reporting information, (4) a determination of what constitutes mitigation to the maximum extent practicable, (5) preliminary approval of a proposed preserve system and related Implementation Agreement, and (6) agreement on of the appropriate environmental documentation for the plan. To assist in providing data pertaining to current or future development plans of individual projects dunng the preparation of the conservation plan, and to provide MSHCP MOU - Revised 8-4-95 8 opportunities to minimize negative impacts u~on long-term conservation planning and the viability of biological resources, and to assist in the preparation of the conservation plan and its ultimate implementation, the Partici.sadng Agencies will utilize the Interim Project Review Process, included as Attachment F, to consider the potential effects of individual projects on the MSHCP. 6.3 Issuance of Sectlot' 10(a"~ Pe .?its art 2081 Take Authorizations. The Sereice and the Depart~3ent agree to issue the required permits and take authorizations for listed species to the local agencies upon finding that the plan and permit/authorization applications meet the criteda for issuance of an incidental take .Derreit and authorization contained in Section 10(a)(2)(B) of the ESA and Section 2U~,; of the Public Resources Code for those species through the establishment of a preserve system that conserves adequate habitat and provides for the retention and management of such preserves in perpetuity. The Service and the Department also agree to provide for expedited issuance of Section 10(a) permits and 2081 authorizations for Covered Species not currently listed pursuant to the ESA or CESA in the event that a non-listed covered species is listed in the future. 6.4 Ass~,mnces to Plan P~rticip~,nts. The approved plan shali provide assurances to Participating Agencies and landowners that if the plan is implemented as 'proposed, no additional land or financial compensation will be sought from them without their consent if "unforeseen" or "extraordinary" circumstances should arise with respect to either listed or unlisted species that are covered by the properly functioning plan. It is understood that species not covered by the plan will not be afforded the same assurances as those that are covered. However, in the event that a species not addressed in the MSHCP is listed at some future date, the Service and the Department agree to use the MSHCP a~ a forum for addressing the conservation needs of the species as required by the ESA and CESA in the same manner that Covered Species have been addressed. All Participating Agencies will make every attempt at accommodating the conservation requiremonte of the newly listed species within the existing conservation strategies and preserves of the MSHCP. 7.0 A!3!')ITIONA! PROVISI,"3N?- 7.1' Good F~ith. This Memorandum is entered into freely and in good faith by the signatory agencies. Each agency affirms that execution of this document is within its legal purview and agrees to fulfill the role slated herein and any other tasks and responsibilities incumbent upon Participating Agencies. All of the Participating Agencies by signature to this Memorandum agree to diligently pursue completion of the subject MSHCP and endorse consensus decisions of the Coordinating Commit'tee as long as the proposed actions are within the statutory and regulatory ability of their respective agency. 7.2 Intedm Project Reviews and A~Drovals. All Participating Agencies recognize that planning efforts undertaken pursuant to this Memorandum can be prolonged beyond anticipated planning schedules due to various unforeseen circumstances. All parties agree that interim land use actions shall be considered on a case by case basis within the purview of each agencies' individual jurisdiction and in compliance MSHCP MOU - Revised 8-4-95 with existing laws and regulations. The MSHCP planning effort shall not be cause to create a "de facto" moratorium for on-going, otherwise legally adequate programs and activities. All permit applications processed during the period of the MSHCP development will be evaluated on their individual merits and in consideration of cumulative impacts to the species and their habitat. Appropriate incentives to tand holders for the protection on non-tisteC species may be achieved through consideration o,f density transfers, land swa~2s witDin the MSHCP area, "Debt for Nature" excharlges, tax incentives through gifts, donations and conservation easements, mitigation banks and purchase of affected property. 7.3 Future listings. It is understood by all parties that the MSHCP planning process and the plan itself, when adopted, is not a substitute for necessary listings of species pursuant to the ESA or CESA. Rather, for all currently unlisted species covered by the approved plan, it is understood that, should future listings occur, the Service and Department shall not require the commitment of additional land or financial compensation beyond the level of mitigation which was otherwise adequately provided for covered species under the terms of the properly functioning plan. 7.4 limit of Authority and Funding. The signatory agencies agree and understand that performance under this agreement by any party is dependent upon the lawful appropriation, availability', and allocation of funds by proper authorities and that this agreement does not constitute a commitment of funds, which must be made by separate action of the appropriate officials of each party. 7.5 Public Involvement. It is the intent of the parties to the Memorandum that the public will be afforded sufficient opportunity to provide input to the MSHCP, not only during the required CEQA and NEPA review process, but during the scoping and planning process, as well. 7.6 !=ff-ctive flute of Agreement. This agreement shall take effect upon the dates of signature. 7.7 Am~-ndment of This Memomndt~m. This Memorandum may be amended at any time with the concurrence of all parties. Approved amendments must be in writing. 7.8 Termination. This agreement shall automatically terminate upon approval and adoption of the plan or on December 31, 1997, which ever occurs first, unless extended as provided in Paragraph 7.7 above. MSHCP MOU- Revised 8-4-95 10 //j / IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO have executed this Memorandum, on the date(s) set forth below, as of the day and year first above wntten, By By Date Chair, San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors and Flood Control District San Bemardino, .~,alifomia Date Mayor, City of Chino Chino, California By Mayor, City of Chino Hills Chino Hills, California Date By Mayor, City of Colton Colton, California Date By Mayor, City of Fontaria Fontana, California Date By Mayor, City of Grand Terrace Grand Terrace, California Date By Mayor, City of Highland Highland, California Date MSHCP MOU - Revised 8-4-95 11 By Mayor, City of Loma Linda Loma Linda, California By Mayor, City of Montctair Montclair, California By Mayor, City of Ontario Ontario, California By Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California By Mayor, City of Redlands Redlands, California By Mayor, City of Rialto Rialto, California By Mayor, City of San Bernardino San Bernardino, California By Mayor, City of Upland Upland, California Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date By Mayor, City of Yucaipa Yucaipa, California By Regional Director, , U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon By California State Director, Bureau of Land Management By District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers By Forest Supervisor, San Bernardino National Forest U.S. Forest Service By Director, California Department of Fish and Game By Region Director, Southern Califomia Edison Company By District Manager, Southern California Gas Company By Regional Director, Metropolitan Water District Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date MSHCP MOU-Revised 8-4-95 13 /:.~ ¢ By Board President, San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District Date By Board Presiclen~, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Date MSHCP MOU - Revised 8-4-95 14 / f~ ~' ATTACHMENT A BOUNDARIES OF THE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN .,% The Habitat Conservation,Plan for the San Bernardino Valley will encompass the area generally bounded by the county lines between San Bernardino County and Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside Counties on the west and south and the Sa~, Bernardino National Forest Boundary on the north and east. A-1 Species Insects ATTACHMENT B List of Species Proposed to Be Coverd in the Valley-W~de Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan Status Federal State INVERTEBRATES Greenest tiger beetle Cicindel~ tmnquebadr--.~ viridissim~ Delhi Sand flower-loving fly Rh~l.0hiomid~s terminators ~hdomin~iis VERTEBRATES Fishes Santa &ha sucker C~tnstnmf fs Santa Ana spe~ da~ Rhinich~ os~l~ ,so~ui~ ~s ssp. ~phib~ A~yo so~s~m to~ ~ micms~h-s R~-t~ged ~g Mountain yellow-I~g~ flog muscos* Reptiles Western pond turtle Clemnys m~rmomt~ ~ Coastal western whiptail Cnemidol~horus ~jgds multiscut~tus FC2 FE FC2 FC2 PE/FSS CSC PF_/FSS CSC FC2/FSS CSC FC2./FSS CSC FC2/FSS CSC Species Status Federal State Coast horned lizard Phrynosoma coronaturn biainviilei San Bernardino ring-necked snake r~iadoDhis.12unct2tus modestus Coastal rosy boa I ichanura tdvirg.~t~ ros~fusc~ Coast patch-nosed snake S~iv~dom hex~ligis virgulte~ Two-striped garter snake Th~mnoghis h~mmondii Birds White-tailed kite I=l~n.~ le~ ~ ~r~,s Nortl~em harder Cimus cy~ne~,s Sharp-shinned hawk Acci~it~r stri~ Cooper's Hawk Accipiter coopedi Ferruginous hawk Buteo reg~iis Golden eagle Aouita chrys~etos c~n~densis Amedcan peregrine falcon ~ i~eregdnatus Praide falcon Falco mexicanus FCZ~FSS FC?JFSS FC2/FSS FC2./FSS FC2JFSS FSS FSS FC2 FE FSS CSC CSC CFP CFP CSC CSC CSC CSC SE CSC Species Western Burrowing owl Speotyto cunicutazia hyl;ugea Long-eared owl ' Asio otus Southwestern willow flycatcher Fmpidon~x trailIll extimus California horned lark !::remophil~ ~lpestris actia Coastal cactus wren C~n'~ylonhynchus brunneica~i!lus California gnatcatcher Polioptil~ califomi~"~ Least's Bell's vireo - ~reo beilii I;)"siil"s California yellow warbler r3en~roir'~ Detechi~ brewster Yellow-breasted chat Califomia rufous-crowned sparrow Aimoghil~ rufice~s ~nescens Bell's sage sparrow AmDhispi?~ be!li belli Tdcolored blackbird Agel=ius tricolor Mammals Greater mastiff-bat FumoDs Derotis califomicus Sl:atus Federal PE/FSS fC3 FC3B FT/FSS FE FC2/FSS FC2 FC2 FC2 State CSC CSC SE CSC CSC SE 05C CSC CSC CSC CSC CSC B-3 Species Status Federal State San Diego black-tailed iackrai2bit ~ californicus b'ennettii Los Angeles pocket mouse Perogn~thus Iongimembris brevinasus San Diego pocket mouse Ch~etodiDus fallax fallax San Bernardino kangroo rat r3i9odomys mem~mi pan/us Southern grasshopper mouse Onychomys tordH~ fs ramon= San Diego desert wood rat Neotom~ ~ intermedi~ FC2 FC2 FC2 FC2 FC2 FC2 CSC CSC CSC CSC CSC CSC / 5/¢ Species Famity Federal Status State CNPS Plants Marsh sandweft Arenada p~ludicola Coulter's saltbush AtriDlex coulted Parish's brittlescate AtdDtex p~dshii Nevin's barberry Rerbeds ~ Round-leaved boykinia ~oykini~ rot~mdifoli~ Thread-leaved brodiaea Brewer's calandrinia C'.~,l~nafini= hreweri Plummer's lily c.~,iocho~- pi~ ~mn'~me Peninsular spineflower C. hori~'=nth,. legtnthe~ Padsh's spineflower C. hod~,~nth~ ~ var. ~ Prostrate spineflower ChodT~nthe pmc~mhens Saw-grass Cl~di, ~m ~lifomic~ ~m Slender-horned spineflower nodec~hem~ leotocems CRY CHN CHN BER SAX ML POR ML PLG PLG PLG CYP PLG FE FC2 FCl FC1 FC2 FE SE SE $E SE lB lB lB lB 4 lB 4 lB 4 4 lB or2 Species Family Federal Status State CNPS Many-stemmed dudleyea Dudleya multicauli~. Santa Aria River woollystar ' Frinstrum densifolium sanctorum Hot Spdng fimbdstylis Fimbdstylis thetrellis California bedstraw ~:~lit~m ~'~lifomicum Ddmum Los Angeles sunflower Heli~th, ts nutt~11ii D~dshii Smooth tarplant Hemi7oni~ pungens iaevis Southem California black walnut J~ ~gl=ns ~'~iifomi~'~ ~lifomi~'~ Coulter's goldenfields ! ~stheni~ ~:ahmt~ coulted Robinson's peppergrass ! ed;)idi~m viroinim=m robinsonii Ocellated Humbolt lily 'Ldium h* ~mhol~di oce!l~t~ ~m Padsh's desert-thom I ycium ~dshii Parish's bush mallow M~l~coth=mnus ~ Pdngle's monarde!la Mon=~eil~ Ddnglei California spineflower Mucrone~ c~tifomic~ CRS PLM CYP RUB AST AST JUG AST BRA ML SOL MLV PLG FC2.JFSS FE FC3B FC2 FC2 FC2 FC2 FC2 FC2 FC2 SE SR 2 lB 1A lB 4 lB lB 4 2 1A 1A 4 Species Family Federal Status State CNPS California muhty Muhlenber~ia calif..ore,ca Little mousetail Myosurus rainlinus a~us Padsh's gooseberry Ribes div~ricatum p2dshii Salt spdng checkerbloom Sid~lce~ neomexic2na Wedge grass .echenopholis obtus2t~ P.$A ~ B RAN FC2 3 SAY, FC2 lB MLV 2 POA 2 Status Codes: FE Listed as Endangered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service FT Listed as Threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service PE Proposed Endangered by the US F'~h and Wildlife Service FC1 Category I candidate for federal listing for which substantial information on the biological vulnerability and threat supports the appropriateness of proposing the species to be listed as endangered or threatened. FC2 Category 2 candidate for federal listing for which insufficient biological information exists to support listing. FSS Forest Service Sens'rtive Species SE Listed as Endangered by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game SR Listed as Rare by the ~alifomia Department of Fish and Game CSC California Department of Fish and Game "Species of Special Concern" CFP California Fully Protected CNPS Califomia Native Plant Society 1A Plants presumed to be extinct,. lB Plants that are rare, threatened or endangered. 2 Plants that are rare, threatened or endangered in California, but common elsewhere. 3 Plants for which insufficient data is available. 4 Plants that are of limited distribution in California and their susceptibility to threat appears low at this time. NOTE: Appearance of a species on this list does not imply the presence or occurrence of the species in all jurisdictions located within the boundaries (Attachment A) of the MSHCP. ATTACHMENT C LIST OF PARTICIPATING AGENCIES AND POINT OF CONTACT San Bernardino County Planning Department Randy Scott. Planning Manager 385 N. Arrowhead Av,¢,., Third Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182 (909) 387-4146 ' (909) 387-3223 (FAX) City of Highland Planning Desar'tment Steve Walker. City Planner 26985 East Base Line Avenue Highland, CA 92346 (909) 8646881 Ext. 215 (909) 862-3180 (FAX) City of Chino Community Development Department Jerry Blum, City Planner 13220 Central Avenue Chino, CA 91708 (909) 590-5520 (909) 591-6829 (FAX) of Chino Hills Community Development Department Jeff Adams, Planner I 2001 Grand Avenue Chino Hills, CA 91709-4869 (909) 590-1511 Ext. 286 (S09) 590-5S4e (FAX) of C /of Colton Public Works Department John C. Hutton, Director 650 North La Cadena Drive Colton, CA 92324-2893 (909) 370-5065 (909) 370-5154 (FAX) Fontana Planning Division Charles LaClaire, Deputy Planning Manager 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA 92334 (909) 350-7627 (909) 350-6613 (FAX) City of Grand Terrace Community Development Department Patrizia Materassi, Community Development Director 22795 Barton Road Grand Terrace, CA 92313 (909) 824-6621 (909) 783-7629 (FAX) City of Loma Linda Planning Department Dan Smith, Director of Community Development 25541 Barton Road Loma L, inda, CA 92354 (909) 799-2830 (909) 799-2890 (FAX) City of Montctair Community Development Department Rob Clark, Community Development Director 5111 Benito Street Uontclair, CA 91763-0808 (eoe) 625-0431 (909) 621-1684 (FAX) City of Ontario Planning Department Otto Kroutil, City Planner 303 East 'B' Street, Civic Center Ontado, CA 91754 (909) 391-2506 (909) 391-0692 (FAX) City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Scott Murphy, Associate Planner 10500 Civic Center Ddve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-1851 (909) 948-1648 (FAX) City of Redlands Planning Department Edc Norris, Principal Planner 30 Cajon Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 798-7555 (909) 798-7503 (FAX) City of City of Rialto Development Services Department Planning Diwsian Donn Morttag, Pnncipal Planner 150 South Palm Avenue Rialto, CA 92378 (909) 421-7218 San Bernardino Department of Planning and Building Services AI Boughey, Birector 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92402 (909) 384-5071 (909) 384-5461 (FAX) of Upland Community Development Department Sylvia Scharf, Senior Planner 460 North Euclid Avenue Upland, CA 91785 (909) 931-4144 (909) 931-4123 (FAX) c yof Yucaipa Planning Department John McMains, Director of Planning 34272 Yucaipa Boulevard Yucaipa, CA 92399 (909) 797-2489 Ext. 231 (909) 790-9203 (FAX) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Jeff Newman 2730 Loker Ave. West Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 431-9440 (619) 431-431-g624 (FAX) Bureau of Land Management Joan Oxendine 63-500 Garnet Ave. North Palm Spdngs, CA 92258-2000 (619) 251-4804 (619) 251-4899 (FAX) U.S. Army Cons of Engineers Antal Szijj 10421 Corporate De.. Suite A Redlands, CA 92374 (909) 478-5000 (909) 478-5511 (FAX) U.S. Forest Service Gone Zimmerman 1824 S. Commercecenter Circle San Bernardino, CA 92408 (909) 884-6634 (909) 383-5770 (FAX) California Department of Fish and Game Liam Davis, Associate Wildlife Biologist 4949 Viewridge Ave. San Diego, CA 92123 (619) 467-4207 (619) 467-4235 (FAX) Southern California Edison Company Michael C. Gatother, Region Manager 287 Tennessee St. Redlands, CA 9237:3 (909) 307-6732 -- (909) 30~-6795 (FAX) Southern California Gas Company Judith W. Battoy, District Manager 624 W. Fourth SL, Suite F San Bernardino, CA 92401 (909) 335-7941 (909) 381-2635 (FAX) Metropolitan Water District Laura Simonek 350 S. Grand Ave., 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 217-6242 (213) 217-6119 San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District Nereus L. Richardson, General Manager P.O. Box 1839 Redlands, CA 92373-0581 (909) 793-2503 (909) 793-0188 (FAX) ATTACHMENT E o o DEFINITIONS Covered Species. Plant a6d animal species which will be found protected from extirpation by the im:~iementation of the MSHCP, issuance criteda for a 10(a) permit. Multi-Species H~bit~t Conserwtion Plan (MSHCP). incidental take of species as described in Section Endangered Species Act of 1973 as amended. adequately and meet A plan developed to allow 10(a)(1)(B) of the fedoral Imglementing A0reement(si. A contract entered into by the Wildlife Agencies and a Local Jurisdiction in which the parties agree to implement the conditions and actions described in a Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. ! isteH SDecies. Plant and animal species protected by listing as threatened or endangered species by one or both of the Federal and State Endangered Species Acts. Preserve .~.yst-m. Area to be perpetually preserved for its habitat value through the coordinated implementation of the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. P,,hlic ! =n~. Land in the ownership or perpetual control of a local, State or federal govemment agency. Rj;~-ci,~s of none~m. Plant and animal species that am I'med as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Federal or State Endangered Species Acts, a candidate species proposed to be listed pursuant to these acts, or rare species in the plan area. T~,ke A, ffhnri'~atinn. A term to describe the collective permits, authod7.ations, and agreements which will'be issued by the Service or the Department to participating local jurisdiction pem~ittees. Take authorizations may be given by the Service and the Department: (a) (b) The Service may issue take authorizations under ESA Section 10(a)(1)(B), and Section 4(d) for the California gnatcatcher. The Department may issue take authorizations under California Fish and Game Code Sections 2081 for candidate, threatened, and endar~gered species; and Section 2835 for the NCCP Act of 1992. /¥7 ATTACHMENT F INTERIM PROJECT R~,/IEVV GUIDELINES This document estaPlishes an agreement among the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service"), the California Desartment of Fish and Game ("Depar'[ment") and all other federal, s:ate and local age.~cies pamcipating in the San Bernardino Valley Multi- Species HaBitat Conse,/'vation Plan (MSHCP) pertaining to an Interim Project Review Process to be utilized during t. he preparation of the Plan. The Intodin Project Review Guidelines (IPRG) have two related purposes: (1) to ensure early review and consideration of proposed projects by the Service and the Department so that projects which could preclude the successful development of the MSHCP will be identified at the earliest possible point in the development review process, and (2) to provide a opportunity for dialogue between the lead agency, the project applicant and the regulatory agencies to explore alternatives or mitigation measures which could minimize and mitigate potential project impacts. Local Agencies have identified that significant problems have adsen in the past when comments on proposed projects are not received from the Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service until very late in the lead agency's decision- making process. To address this problem with respect to projects which may have the potential to preclude long-term conservation strategies addressed in the MSHCP or ~:oP,,,a_m.,~_e,_via_b_ii;,i[Y._of ?01ogical..r~sources, the Service and the Department are ,,,,,,,-~-~ ~ m~-~ w~n me appropriate pmi~ ~ro~onent at "-- ---~--, -----',- .... · . . . . :?-~ .~. ~. u,~ ~ ,~ iaa~lgle pOII1L Earty ~dentification of potential impacts will assist ~n the preparation of environmental documents for the project and provide the opportunity to identify potential project alternatives and mitigation measures for consideration in compliance with Public Resources § 21080.3(a). The IPRG specifically does not create an additional layer of project review nor to confer any additional authority on the Department, the .,Service or lead agency. The recommendations of the Service am:l Department are advisory;, the final decision of whether to approve, modify, or deny a project remains in the hands of the lead agency pursuant to existing laws. A. Guidelines for Projects to Be Included in the Review Process Each lead agency and/or project proponent shall determine whether a project should be reviewed pursuant to the IPRG. Generally, the lead agency or project proponent may consider that a project as defined by CEQA § 21065, except those projects statutory or categorically exempt from CEQA,, located within the sensitive habitat areas of the MSHCP boundaries, has the potential to preclude long term preservation planning or impact the viability of biological resources, and it is appropriate to utilize the IPRG. The lead agency retains the discretion to determine that a project within the plan area, because of the project's characteristics, has no impact on the viability of biological resources and would not preclude long term preservation planning. F-1 B. Overview of the Process/Relationship to CEQA and NEPA Serwce and the De.~ar~ment shall each identi~ a lead person for ~roject review ~, : meeting attendance. The lead person for the County and each city. shall be the designee. Other Particioating Agency will Planning Director or the Planrang Director's ' De detem~med on an as-r~eeCed basis. The Planning Direfor/designee or project proponent shall initiate con~jltation by notif*/ing the designated representative of the Service and the Department of the need for a review meeting for one or several specified projects. Where th,e project proponent is a pdvate landownerfdeveloDer, the Planning Director for the lead agency shall also be notified. Prior to the project review meeting, the Planning Director/designee or project proponent shall provide basic information (as delineated under -Procedures" below) to the Service and the Bepartment. For purposes of CEQA, the project review meeting and any related activities (site visits, follow-up correspondence etc.) shall constitute a consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code §21080.3(A). If possible at the meeting, but otherwise in not more than 30 days following the meeting or such shorter pedod of time as shall be necessary to enable the lead agency to comply with T'ffJe 14 California Code of Regulations §15102, the Service and the Department shall provide input to the lead agency as to · whether either agency believes the project may have the potential to preclude long-term preservation planning or impact the viability of a biological resource. The Service and Debt for Natu of affected property easements, mitigation banks and purchase ' When either the Service or the Deparl~nent identifies the potential for a project to · , and that the project will have a significant reservation plan.nlng . . atives and/or m'tdgation mreclude long-term P J .-,-.-,~-- -ither arolect aitem . _ ,.,...~ i~nnact on ~ioio¢cai resou..rc. es an_a~ '..~_m",u"~.~,ated~ Negative Dectarati_on or_ a u,-,, · "; ......~,hich are a~l~ressea ,- .- ' ....' ,---=-.., ,,~,,-onent, ~e ~ervice and .~e Department may agree_to _scn.~,,~ ~i Ira-act Report within 30 days a1~er me Declaration or the Draft Environmen .~ . · ' 45 da s a~er ....... ,~- Miti-ated Negative Declaration_ =n_d~withtn Y preparation and re~.ea.s~ ~,_ =_, .. r~,.,w ~: vironrnental impaCt ~(epor~. the preparation anti release u, ~ ~, .....n it is recognized that implementing the IPRG is a voluntary cooperative process and neither confers any authority not granted by existing planning and environmental laws, nor negates any authority so granted. The IPRG is intended only to facilitate cooperation among the lead agencies, the resource agencies and project applicants to ensure 'timely review of projects which have the potential to preclude long term preservation planning and to facirrtate the resolution of issues which might affect the successful preparation of the MSHCP. F-2 C: PROCEDURES At least three weeks prior to the desired IPRG meeting date the Planning Director/designee or project prosonen', snail notify the Service and the de12artment and the MSHCP contaG serson in wrrting of any project(s) which the lead agency or proje~ proponent ,,v~sr~es :c wave reviewed at the IPRG meeting. For each proje~ . the iead agency/prc!e~ ;,rcponent will transmit two copies of each of the fotlo~ng: · a location map on a 7.5' quad sheet identifying the project site · a site plan or other illustration depicting the project as proposed · the project application or other summary sheet identifying existing general plan designation and zoning, and any proposed changes; existing land use on the site; and the type and intensity of land use proposed. · the Initial Study or Environmental Assessment and a biological resource survey if one has been prepared; if one has not been prepared then a description of the site including vegetation, presence of a floodplain, blueline stream, or other environmental resource, hazard or constraint., and a list of sens'~ve species which have the potential to occur on site. · Any other information deemed pertinent by the lead agency. The lead agency or project proponent shall be responsible for notifying the other party of the date, time, and location of the IPRG review meeting, if the attendance of the project applicant is desired. At the review ,,,~.~,g, the lead agency, project pmponm~ the Service and the Department will have the opportu~ to discuss the project, armwet questions, etc. A representative from an adjacent jurisdiction which may be affected by the pmpceed project may also attend the meeting at that juriad'K:tion's discretion. At the review meeting if possible, otherwise in not' more than. 30 day~ after the review meeting, the Service and the Department representatives shall provide the following information to the lead agency and the project applicant: · A statement as to whether, in the agency's opinion: The project will not preclude long term conservation planning or adversely impact the viability of a species. The project has the potential to preclude long term conservation planning or adversely impact the viability of a species and additional studies on specific species may be necessary, and project alternatives and~or mitigation measures need to be assessed in the environmental review process. A project may be scheduled for an additional IPRG meeting at an appropriate date if there is a need for the Service or the Department to respond to a Draft Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration. EIR for GPA 96-03B & 97-01 and VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES UNDER CONSIDERATION EXHIBIT "G" L..~AA.tsoc~ate$, Inc 6.0 ALTERNATIVES The Califorma Envu-onmental Qualip' Act (CEQA) requires that an Environmen- tal Impact Report (EIR) include a discussion of reasonable proiect altemat:ves that a.~ "capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects on the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the atta/n- ment of the project objectives, or would be more costly" (CEQA Section 15126(d)(1)). The analysis provided in Chapter 4.0 determined that short ,erm pollutant ermssions during construction and long-term local a/r quality impacts would be significant. All other impacts are considered less than significant or reduced to below the level of significance with mitigation. If the environmen- tally superior alternative is determined to be the No Project Alternative, the EIR must also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives, if the analysis indicates that significant impacts can be avoided by one or more alternatives. Following is a discussion on alteznatives to the pro- posed project. 6.1 ALF~RNA~IIr~$ UNDER CONSlDF. RATION The following development scenarios have been identified as potential alterna- tives to implementation of the proposed project. Under the No Project/No Development Alternative, the project site would remain in its existing vamnt conditio~ The site could contain electric transmis- sion towers in the future under the current zoning; however, for the purpose of the "No Development Alternatives" anal~is, the no development scenario is . Opon Spa~ Park ~lt and Trails System Th/s alternative is a rational choice as a land use altemat/ve for a long slender 84.15-acre parcel (330 feet wide by 10,756 feet long). This strip of land would contain a landscaped pat/tway along the length of future Day Creek Boulevard to enhance views of Mt. Baldy to the north and would also contmn a trails system that would connect the ex/sting and future planned residential areas in the Victoria Windrows area to the east and west of future Day Creek Boulevard (south of Highland Avenue and north of Base Line Road) to the proposed regional commercial area south of Base Line Road and north of Interstate 15 0-15). Under the Lower Density Alternative, a General Plan and Vietom Communtity Plan amendment would be proposed that would be the same as proposed with the project between Highlmad Avenue and Base Line Road. However, the 2/B,~)8/R:\CRG?30WI/II~xSECT.6.FNL) 6-1 densities would be limited to the lower range within each land use categoD' (i.e., Low Density. [2 units;acre], Low. Medium Density. [4 units/acre], and Me- dium Densit3,' [8 urals;acre]). in the area south of Base Line Road. the land uses proposed would include 10.~ acres of Low-Medium DensiR' (4 units.,'acre) from Base line Road south to one-half the distance between Base Line Road and Church Street and Medium Density (8 units/acre) on 10.4 acres from one-half the distance between Base Line Road Church Street south to Church Street. The 27.7 acres south of Church Street would remain Regional Relate'~ Of- rice/Commercial as proposed with the project. The intent of this alternative is to potentially reduce the proposed project's impacts on public services, specifi- cally schools. . O.l~'.$~t~ al~~ Section 15126(d) of the CEQA GuideLines requires that an ~IR consider only those feasible alternatives that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant impacts identified for the project alternative. The General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga allows for the development of residential uses m a number of areas primarily within the northerly portion of the City, m areas designated for a wide range of resi- dential densities similar to the proposed General Plan Amendments. Southern California Edison (SCE) owns utility corndot easements to the north and south of the proposed project area that are actually an extension of the same utility easement as the proposed project. Potentially, the area that con- tams the utility easement north of Highland Avenue could be processed for a proposed General Plan Amendment to allow a variety of residential densities similar to the proposed project. 6.2 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS The following discussion compares the impacts of ~ alternative with the impacts of the proposed project, as detailed m Chapter 5.0 of this EIR. A con- clusion is provided for ~ impact as to whether the alternative results in one of the followins: 1) reduction or elimination of the impact; 2) a gr~tter impact than the project; 3) the same impact as the proiect; or 4) a new impact in addition to the proposed proiect impacts. Table 6.2-1 compares the impacts of the alternatives with those of the proposed project. Alter-native 1 - No Proje~/No Development A~tive With the No Project/No Development Alternative, the site would remain in its existing vacant condition. Most of the potential impacts associated with the proposed project would be avoided, especially the proposed project's impact on air quality which remained significant after mitigation. 2~SD8(R :\CRG '~30~FElR'$ECT-6.FNL) 6-2 Table 6.2-1 - S-mmary of the Comparison of the Project Alternatives to the Proposed Project Environmental Lower Analysis ~'oposed No Project Open Space Density Off-Site Subject Project Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Notes: []" Gr~tt~ ~ = As compared to the propreed project tbe impact is the same. Without further development of the project site, drainage improvements to convey increased ranoff from introduced impervious surfaces would not be required. However, ,,ei*zin$ sheet flow conditions would continue on site. Drainage iml:~,.,.L,~.,~lts a.~!oeiatl~! ~ the pro~ project would ameliorate existing on-site drainage and sheet flow conditiom. Erosion of exposed soils during the construction phase would be eliminated with this alternative. However, this alternative would not reduce the erosion of currently exposed soils, and existing sedimentation levels would continue into Day Creek Channel. The existing level of sedimentation is greater than would occur with the proposed project. Compared to the proposed project as mitigated, this alternative would have reduced impacts on drainage, with the exception of slight erosion of currently exposed soils and sedimentation. Tra2~c The No Project/No Development Alternative would not generate any additional traffic on the arterial circulation network. With or without implementation of the proposed project, seven intersections are forecast to exceed the County 2/~/98 ('R: \CRG'~ 30~FEIR~ ECT-6 FNL) 6-3 Management Plan (CMP) Level of Service (LOS) E standard under 2015 traffic conditions v,,ith or without the project; thus, this alternative would not serve to reduce existing or projected congestion. Compared to the project, this alter- native would not result ~n any increased traffic or the need for roadv,~v prove~ents. A~r ~ual~ty This alternative would eliminate short-term air quality impacts from fugitive dust and construction equipment emissions generated by the project during construction. Operational emissions of the proposed project would result in a total of 851 lbs./day of CO, 64 lbs./clay of ROC, 136 lbs./day of NOx, 15 lbs./day of SOx, and 19 lbs./day of PM~0. Among them, the emissions for'CO, ROC, and NOx would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for daily operations by at large margin (especially NOx). Even gfter implementa- tion of the mitigation measures identified, it is not guaranteed that the erms- sions would be reduced to below the thresholds with the proposed project. When compared to the proposed project's significant long-term air quality impacts, this alternative would eliminate vehicle and stationary source emis- sions resulting from project related traffic and energy consumption. The project as proposed would not contribute significantly to inezased noise levels at off-site receiver locations, either during construction or in the long term. ~ Alte~ would eliminate any potemial project related increases in noise levels attributed to project traffic and construction activities. All road- way segments analyzed for the proposed project would have the 60 dBA Ldn extending more than 50 ~ from the roadway centerline. Therefore, all noise- sensitive uses, ~ri,tmg or proposed, located within the impact zone would be exposed to noise level exceeding 60 dBA Ldn. This is a potentially significant noise impact, even though the proposed project's conu'ibution would be small and mostly negligible and would _~ri~ with or without the proposed project. Public Services And Utilit~s Without new development on the project site, increased demand for public services, such as police and fire suppression services, schools facilities, and parks would not occur. The proposed project does not identify significant impacts to paxks, police, and fire services before implementation of the identi- fied mitigation. This alternative would eliminate any potential effects and the need for mitigation. Future development would generate more students for the already impacted school districts and is considered significant. School mitigation plans would be enacted between the Etiwanda School Dis- trict/ChatfeyJomt Umon High School Dismet and the project developer provid- ing for a per dwelling umt fee rate for the residential portion of the project site. Implementation of this mitigation would reduce impacts on schools to a less- than-significant level with the proposed project. 2/BD8 (R:\CRG730~FEIE~SECT-6 FNL) 6-4 ~ A~soctates. Inc, With the proposed project, future development proposals for the area must provide 3.4 acres of active recreation w~thin the Windrows planning area and 5.9 acres of active recreation within the Victoria Lakes planning area. for a total of 9.3 acres of park space. This alternative would eliminate the need for addi- tiona.lyaxk apace ba~¢d on population increase. Biological Resources Biological resources studies conducted for the proposed project concluded that no significant biological resources occur on site including the San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat and the California gnatcatcher, both protected species. It was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant im- pact on biological resources and no mitigation would be recluired. This alter- native would have the same impact on biological resources as the proposed project. Cultural R~ource$ This alternative would eliminate any potential impacts to unknown subsurface historic artifacts or cultural resources: Although with mitigation the proposed project would not result m any significant unavoidable adverse impacts to cultural resources, this alternazive would eliminate the need for mitigation. This alternative would areaid the visual alteration of the physical appearance of the site due to project construction However, this alternative would also elimi- naxe the ~__~,_thetic public benefits provided by the project including: 1) provi. sion of infill d~t that would complmmmt the ,.qri~ing residential neig, hborhoods to the east; and 2) developmeant of a planned community that establishes a landscape p~ and mech=nt~m for 1on~.v~txn maintenance of landscape ..... ~ while ~n~h~ne~g the public vizn~ of the S~n Gabriel Moun- tains to the north. The No Project/No Development Alternative would reduce and/or eliminate all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed project. In particular, significant adverse impLetS related to short-term construction emissions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for daily operations by a large margin (especially NOx), would not occur with this alternative. However, this alternative would result in impacts by eFanmating opportunities to provide hou$itlg and meet the goals of the City's General Plan Housing Element. This alternative would fail to meet three important objectives of the project and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The first objective is to preserve the single family character of residential neighborhoods within the City and provide a variety of housing types for various income levels; the second objective is to protect the neighborhood quality and residential nature of the neighborhood 2/8~)8(R: \CRG730~ ~.m~SECr~.F?¢L) 6-5 to the east; the third objective is to provide infill residential and commercial development within the context of a planned community. Alternative 2 - 0~ Space Greenbelt and TraiLs System Alternative With the Open Space Greenbelt and Trails System Alternative, the site would be developed as a greenbelt and contain a trails .system. Most of the potential impacts associated with the proposed project would be avoided, especiah~ -he proposed projeet's impact on air quality which remained significant after miti- gation. This alternative is determined to be the Environmentally Superior Alternative after the No project/No Development Alternative. Drainago Construction of impervious surfaces with this alternative would create similar water runoff impacts to those identified for the proposed project. Appropriate drainage facilities would be required as part of site design, as has been com- pleted for the proposed project, demonstrating adequacy of the existing and proposed facilities to accommodate projected discharge. Since drainage associ- ated with the proposed project can be accommodated by the earlsting and proposed facilities, it is expected that runoff associated with Alternative 2 can also be accommodated. Potential drainage impacts are considered less than significant for either the proposed project or this alternative after mitigation. Alternative 2 would result in a fewer number of daily and peak hour vehicle trips than the proposed project. The amount of traffic generated by this alter- native would be contingent on the user that the site would attract. For m- stance, would the~ be on-~ite parlgn$ provided for the tr~ls use? If not, this alternative would generate few d~i!y vehicle trips. With or without implementa- tion of the proposed project, seven intersections are forecast to exceed the CMP LOS E standard under 2015 traffic conditions with or without the project, therefore, this alternative would not serve to reduce projected congestion. Compared to the proposed project, this alternative would result in. a reduced number of traffic impacts. This alternative would create similar significant short-term air quality impacts from fugitive dust and construction equipment emissions generated by the project during construction, because grading and construction activities would occur under both Alternative 2 and the proposed project. Operational emissions of the proposed project would result in a total of 851 lbs./day of CO, 64 lb~./day of ROC, 136 !ba./day of NOx, 15 lba./day of SOx, and 19 lbs./day of PMt0. Among them, the emissions for CO, ROC, and NOx would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management Dismet thresholds for daily operations by a large margin (especially NOx). Even after implementation of the mitigation measures identified, it is not guaranteed that the emissions 6-6 2/BD8 (R :,,CRG-r 3 0~. glIi~SECT.6 .FNI.) L.fA Assoctates. Inc would be reduced to below the thresholds. Therefore, it would remain a significant impact with the proposed project. ~X'hen compared to the proposed project's significant long-term air quailD' impac~s~ this alternative would eliminate vehicle and stationarT source emis- sions resulting from project related tra~c and energy consumption. Noise The project as proposed would not contribute significantly to increased noise levels at off. site receiver locations, either during construction or in the long term. This Alternative would eliminate any potential project related increases in noise levels attributed to project traffic. All roadway segments analyzed for the proposed project would have the 60 dBA Ldn extending more than 50 feet from the roadway centerline. Therefore, all noise.sensitiv~ uses, existing or proposed, located within the impact zone would be exposed to noise level exceeding 60 dBA Ldn. This is a potentially significant noise impact, even though the project's contribution would be small and mostly negligible and would exist with or without the proposed project. Public Services And Utilities Without development on the project site that generates a population increase, increased demand for public services, such as police and fire supp _res__sion services, schools facilities, and parks would not occur. Tim propole :~ project does not identify significant impacts to patits, police, and fire services before implementation of the identified mitigation, this altea-native would elirain=re any potential effects and the need for mitigation. Future development would generate more students for the alreazdy impacted school districts and is consid- ered significant. School mitigation plans would be en~ct_~ b~L~CCn the Etiwanda School District/Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the project developer providing for a per dwelling unit fee rate for the residential portion of the project site. Implementation of rhi.~ mitigation would reduce impacts on schools to a less-than-significant level with the proposed project. With the proposed project, future development proposals for the area must provide 3.4 acres of active recreation within the Windrows planning area and 5.9 acres of activ~ recreation within the Victoria Lakes planning area, for a total of 9.3 acres of park space. This alternative would eliminate the need for addi- tional park space based on population increase and would have a beneficial impact by providing 84.15 acres of open space and a trail system in the Victoria Community Plan area. The proposed project would also be required to provide a multi-use trail sys- tem the length of "future" Day Creek Boulevard to reduce the project's impacts on the City's trail system and to mitigate any view shed impacts. This Alterna- tive would provide a trail system eliminating the need to mitigate the proposed project's impacts on the viewshed and trail system. 2/~/98(R:\CRG730q' I:AII~SEC-'T-~ FN'L) 6-7 Biological Resources Biological resources studies conducted for the proposed project concluded that no s~gnfficam biological resources occur on site including the San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat and the Ca. hfomia gnatcatcher. both protected species. It was ~letermmed that the proposed project would not have a significant im- pact on biological resources and no mitigation would be required. This alter- native would have the same impact on biological resources as the prot~osed project. Cultural Resources This alternative would have identical grading impacts and possible effects on unknown culruraJ resources. There is the same potential for encountering subsurface historic artifacts during construction activities. However, with mitigation identified, neither the proposed project nor this alternative would result m any significant impacts to cultural resources. Aesthetics This alternative would result m a visual and aesthetic alteration of the physical appearance and character of the project site as viex~red from travelers along future Day Creek Boulevard. This alternative would preserve views of the San Gabriel Mountains by providing an open ~ linear corndot of pleasing aesthetic value and is compatible with the ~ and policies of the Victoria Community Plan. Conc2usUm Alternative 2 would have less significant adverse environmental impacts than that of the proposed project discussed in Section 5.0. In particular, si!~fificant unavoidable adverse impacts to local air quality would be reduced under this alternative. All other impacts of the proposed project would also be reduced under this alternative including impacts on public ~'vices, traffic, potential exposure of residences to noise related impam, and aesthetics. With the Lower Density Alternative, the site would be developed with residen- tial land uses at a lower density than with the proposed proiect. The commer- cial land use designations would remain the same as proposed with the project. Most of the potential impacts associated with the proposed proiect would be avoided, especially the proposed project's impact on air quality which re- roamed significant after miUgation. Drainage Construction of impervious surfaces with this alternative would create similar water runoff impacts to those identified for the proposed proiect. Appropriate 6-8 ~ Assocuates. !no drainage facilities would be requtred as pan of site design, as has been com- pleted for the proposed project, demonstrating adequacy, of the existing and proposed faciliues to accommodate projected discharge. Since drainage associ- ated with the proposed proiect can be accommodated bv the existing and propo~d facilities, it is expected that runoff associated with Alternative 3 can also be accommodated. Potential chainage impacts are considered the same as with the proposed project. Tra. O~c Alternative 3 would result m a fewer number of daily and peak hour vehicle trips than the proposed project. The amount of tra~c generated by this alter- native would be contingent on the number of vehicle trips generated with the lower residential densities on site. Compa-,~d to the proposed project, this alternative would result in a reduced number of trottic imp~'ts and would lmve a lesser impact on areawide circulation. This alternative would create similar significant short-term air quality impacts from fugitive dust and construction equipment emissions generated by the project during construction, because grading and construction activities would occur under both Altemativ~ 3 and the pfopos~ :~ project. Ol~:rati~mi ~ oftl~ ~v:s~-' !~o~mt ~ Im r~im:~! ~'th imple- mentation of Alternative 3. It has been demtmin~ tl~ th~ proposed project would have a sigr~ille~nt ur~oid~ impact o~ air ~ ~llgeeed~ the South Coast Air Quality Management District tht~holds for CO, ROC, and NOx. Even after implementation of the mitigation measur~ identified, it is not guaranteed that the ~ns would I~ reduced to below the ~old$ with the pro- When compared to the pro~ project's 's~lifieamt klog-~rm air quality impacta, this alternative would reduce vehicle a~d $uaio~xtry aource emissions reaulting from projgmt related tra~c and energy eon~mptioo and may rc-cluce the project's impact$ on CO, ROC, and NOx below levels of significance. The project as proposed would not contribute significantly to increased noise levels at off-site receiver locations, either during construction or in the long- term. This Alternative would eliminate any potential project related increases in noise levels attributed to project traffic by reducing the number of vehicle trips generated. All roaoN~ay segments analyzed for the proposed project would have the 60 dBA Ldn extending more than 50 feet from the roadway centerline. Therefore, all noise-sensitive uses, ernstrag or proposed, located within the impact zone would be exposed to noise level exceeding 60 dBA Ldn, with or without the project. This is a potentially significant noise impact, even though the proposed project's contribution would be small and mostly negligi- ble and would exist with or without the proposed project. Therefore, the incremental noise increase generated by tra~c would be redfaced slightly. 2/BD8 (R:\CRG730WEIR~ECT-6. FNL) 6-9 LSA Associates. Inc Public Services And Utilities With new development on the pro~ect site, increased demand for public ser- vices, such as police and fire suppression services, schools facfliues, and paxks would occur. The proposed project does not identify, significant impacts to fire services before implementation of the identified mitigation, however, this alternative would lessen any potential effects because of a reduction in popula- tion from 2,273 with the proposed project to 659 with a lower density alterna- tive. Table 6.2-2 provides the number of students that would be generated with Alternative 3. Alternative 3 would generate a total of 178 students m the Etiwanda School District (elementary) and 56 students m the Chaffey School District. The proposed project would generate a total of 625 student (474 elementary students and 151 secondary students). The proposed project would generate a total of 391 more students than the lower density alternative for the already impacted school districts and is considered significant. School mitigation plans would be enacted between the Etiwanda School Dis- tri~C_.hafft'y Joint Union High School Distact and the project developer provid- ing for a per dwelling unit fee raze for the residential portion of the project site. Implementation of this mitigation would reduce impacts on schools to a less- than-significant level with the proposed project and Alternative 3. Table 6.2-2 - N-tuber of Students Generated by Alternative 3 Low Demity 10.8 22 10 4 4 (2-4 DU/AC') Low-medium Den- 17.8 71 sity (4-8 DU/AC) M~h~um Dem~ 8.5 66 28 13 13 (sq4 DU/AC) Subtotal 36.9 159 69 31 31 i,o~ ~ Deity 10.4. 41 18 S 8 (4-8 DU/AC) Medium 10.4 83 36 16 17 (s-14 DU/AC) Subtotal 20.8 124 54 24 25 TOTAl. 84.5 285 123 55 56 Note~: Highest density l~vel S~t ~n ~*~ ~r ~ ~,~J~t U~ H~ ~l ~ ~r 9-12 ~ 0.2~ ~ umt 2/8D8 (]~:\C~G730WE~SEC'T-6.1~L) 6-10 With the proposed project, future development proposals for the area must provide 3.4 acres of active recreation within the Windrows planning area and 5.9 acres of active recreation within the Victoria Lakes planning area, for a total of 9.3 acres of park space. Table 6.2-3 provides the number of acres of park land ~at would be required by the lower density, aJternatrve. With this alterna- tive, the area between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road would require 1.4 acres of park land, and between Base IAne Road and 1-15 would requ/re 1.9 acres of park land. However, as shown in Table 6.2-4 there is a su.r~lus of 1 acre of park land in the Windrows area arid 1 acre in the Vietom Lakes ai es. Therefore, Alternative 3 would require 0.4 acre in the Windrows area and 0.9 acre in the Vietom l~kes area, This alternative would eliminate the need for additional 9.3 acres of park space based on population ruerease of the proposed project. Table 6.2-3 - Acres Re~tre~d for Active Recreation f~r. Alternative 3 l,sad U~e Dermiry Ac~ UMm Peraom2 Re~$ ~ ~miW (24 DU/A~ 10.8 22 ~ 0.3 ~-M~m ~miW 17.8 71 21 0.1 M~ ~ 8.~ ~ ~ L0 ~14 DU/A~ S~mM ~.9 1~ ~' 1.4 ~-M~im ~i~ 10.4 41 123 0.6 M~m ~ 10.4 ~ 2~ 1.3 ~4 DU/A~ T~ 57.69 28~ 659 3.3 No~: 2 H~~of3.01 ~ ~H~ ~ ~ of 1 ~ of~ ~n ~ ~r E~ 2~ ~ (1~). Table 6.2.4 - Active Recreation within ~g'mdgow~ and Victoria Lakes p!~nnlrtg Areas No. of No. of People Per !~vpluoo_ Units Planning Arem t No. of Acres No. of Acres Needed z Provided Windrows 1,740 5,237 26 27 Lalms 2,185 6,577 33 34 Notes: I Household r-ate of 3.01 persons per household. 2 Ratio of lacr~ for every 200 persons. 2/8D8 fR: \CRG~ 0WEII~ECT-& FNL) 6-11 Impacts would be in the form of a need for expanded services routinely associ- ated with residential growth. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, Alternative 3 would require one-half additional officer, plus sup- port personnel, equipment. and facilities. This number was obtmned bv using the Cif~'s officer generation rate of 0.741/1,000 residents. Using an esumated 3.01 persons per household, 659 residents would be generated by the 283 residential units for this alternative. One-half officer would be needed for the residential portion of the project and one additional officer to respond to calls for the 300,000 square feet of co_mmercial use that is proposed. This alter~m- rive would generate the need for four and one-half leas police officers than the proposed project. In addition, site development would require adequate access into the site for all emergency vehicles. The additional number of homes and commercial areas would provide on-site targets for criminal activity. The proposed project and Alternative 3 would contribute to an meremental ruerease m demand on police service as the proposed project. Btolo~wal R~sources Biological resources studies conducted for the proposed project concluded that no significant biological resources occur on site including the San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat and the California gnatcatcher, both protected species. It was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant im- pact on biological resources and no mitigation would be required. This alter- native would have the same impact on biological resources as the proposed project. Cultural Resourc~ This alternative would have identical grading impacta and possible effects on unknown cultural reaourc~. There is the aame potential for encountering subsurface historic artifa~ during construction actinnMea. However, with mitigation identified, neither the proposed project nor this alternative would result in any significant impacts to cultural resources. Impacts would be the same as with the proposed project At t~ ~tic~ This alternative would result in a visual and aesthetic alteration of the physical appe~ance and c. ha~c~er of the proiect site as viewed by travelers along future Dzy Creek Boulevard. Development with Alternative 3 would be similar to that of the proposed project with lesser intensity because of the reduced residential densities. Impacts on aestheUcs and the view corridor of the San Gabriel Mountains would be the same with this Alternative as with the proposed pro- ject. The proposed project's impacts on air quality, traffic, fire, police, schools, and parks would be reduced with implementation of Alternative 3. There would be 2/~D8 ('R :\CRG730WEIR'.S ECT-6 · FNL ) 6-12 ~ Assooates. Inc a slight reduction in vehicular traffic noise impacts with this alternative. The proposed proiect's mapacts on chainage, biological resources, cultural re- sources, and aesthetics would remaxn the same with Alternative 3. Alternative 4 - Off-Site A~tive Analysis of the availability of adequate alternative parcels for implementation of the proposed project u~ili~ed information provided in the City's Genera, ."'an and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The focus of this investigation was to determine whether appropriately sized parcels are available within the City to accommodate the proposed project while meeting the project objectives, primarily those associated with provision of infill residential development within a context of a planned commumty and preservation of the single family character of residential neighborhoods within the City. SCE owns utility comdor easements to the north and south of the proposed project area that are actually an extension of the same utility easement as the proposed project. Potentially, the area that contains the utility e~sement north of Highland Avenue could be processed for a proposed General Plan Amen- dment from Utility Corridor to Residential to allow a variety of residential densities similar to the proposed project. However, it may not be appropriate to propose a General Plan Amendment to allow the higher intensity land use of the regional related of~ce/commel'ci~ designation of the proposed project in this ~ but the residential land uses may be appropris~. The residential land uses at a lower intmmity may be more appropriate in this srea to be compatible with evi~ing residential densities in the are~ which are low density (2-4 du/ac.). Overall, the proposed proiect's impacts on drainage, u-at~, noise, public ser- vices (fu-e, police, schools, and p~rks), biological resources, and cultural re- sources would remain the same with this alternmive site. The significant un- avoidable impacts on ~ir quality would also be the same as with the proposed project since the ~ir quality imp~c-ts of the proposed pro~-~'t are a result of operational vehicle emissions which would not be reduced with this alternative. Biological resources studies conducted for the prolx~ed project concluded that no significant biological resources occur on site including the San Bernardino Merriam's k~ngaroo rat and the California gnatcatcher, both protected species. It was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant im- pact on biological resources and no mitigation would be required. This alter- native would require biological resource survc-ys be conducted to determine whether the San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat and/or the California gnatcatcher occur on site. This alternative does contain habitat that could support both species. If the species are not present on site, this alternative would have the same impact on biological resources as the proposed proiccP. Impacts on aesthetics may potentially be the same with this alternative site. The alternative site is not within the Victoria Commumty Plan but is in the Etivranda North Specific Plan that is similar to the Victoria Community Plan and also has design guidelines which protect and enhance aesthetics and view corridors. 2/B,,98 OR: \CRG 750~ ~XSECT-6.FNL) 6-13 l..~t A~$oc, ntes, Inc 6.3 In conclusion, an alternative site within an Edison utility, comdor would have the same impacts as the proposed project and would not reduce the proposed projects' significant unavoidable long.term impact on atr qualit3,'. ENVIRONM~ALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE The No Project~o Development Alternative is an Environmentally Superior alternative since no development would occur on the project site. Unlik~ -he proposed project or the project alternatives, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not increase demand for public services, increase tra~c volumes, circulation, air emissions and noise levels (associated with construc- tion and operation of additional land uses), cause the additional need for recreational facilities, or increase potential impsets to biological or cultural resources, drainage, and aesthetics that may otherwise result from development of the project site. Signitieant short-term construction e~. ions would be eliminated, and significant unavoidable long-term CO, ROC, and NOx emis- sions would be reduced with the No ProjectdNo Development Alternative. As required by C£QA (Section 15126(d)(4), fithe No Project/No Development Alternative is selected as the environmentally superior alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alterna- tives. Among the alternatives considered, the open space/trails system alterna- tive has the least damaging environmental impacts. Of the viable alternatives, the open space/trails system alternative would result m fewer daily and peak hour vehicle raps and conruminant emissions, and incremental increases in ambient noise levels, and impacts on schools and parira. Potential Ions-term local air quality impacts are considered significant unavoidable adverse impacts under either the propo~.'<i project or Alternatives 3 or 4. Alternative 2, how- ever, would result m reduced impacts to long-term air quality and is environ- mentally superior to all other alternatives. There are economic impacts to the City with the implementation of Alternative 2. If the site is to be converted to a open space/trails system, the City would have to 1) purchase the property, 2) construct the trail system, and 3) provide long-term maintenance of a trail system on the 84.15-acre site. The cost to purchase the property, and construct and maintain the tr~il. may cause an additional financial burden on the City residents depending on how the City chooses to provide funding. In light of Proposition 218, additional use taxes would have to go to City wide vote. Long-term funding for a City trail system on this site is not certain. 2/B/98CR :\ClZG?30q- ~mXSECT-6 .FNL) 6-14 EIR for GPA 96-03B & 97-01 and VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM EXHIBIT "H" LSA Associates, Inc. APPENDIX K- MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN This mmgation morntoting plan has been prepared for use in implementing mitiga~tion measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report for General Plan 'Amendments 96-03B and 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96-01 and 97-01/Edison Company project. This program has been prepared in compliance with the State law to ensure compliance with mitigation measures adopted for the project by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Assembly Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code, Paragraph 201081.6), effective January 1, 1989, requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for those conditions of approval placed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment. The law states that the monitoring or reporting program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. The monitoring program contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure compliance. In some instances, one action, such as plan review, may be used to verify implementation of several conditions of approval. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. The program has been designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based on recommendations by those responsible for the program. If changes are made, new monitoring compliance procedures and records will be developed and incorporated into the program. 278/98(R:',CRG 730~FEIR',.MITMO N FN~) K-1 /'~7 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures DRAINAGE 4.1.1A. Any development proposed Developer shall prepare Prior to approval between Highland Avenue and Base Line and submit to the City for of Final Tract Road shall be conditioned to convey on-site review and approval Map. drainage to the west to Day Creek Channel development plans. by storm drain systems in Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road. Report/rig Process Milestones Party Initials City's Engineering Dept. City's Engineering Dept. 4.1.lB. The developer shah amend the City's Final Master Plan of Drainage Report prior to Final Map approval to account for the change in land use from open space to residential uses. Developer shah prepare Prior to approval and submit to the City for of Final Tract approval amendments to Map. the Ctty's Final Master Plan of Drainage. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. 4.1. IC. The developer shall study the existing 96-inch RCP stubout, located approximately 462 feet from Victoria Park Lane to determine its adequacy. Improvements shall be installed as required. TRAFFIC 4.2.1A. The project proponent shall contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's adopted traffic fee program (Transportation Department Impact Fee Ordinance No. 445) for backbone infrastructure improvements. in addition, the project proponent shall make a fair share contribution to additional circulation improvements necessary to maintain an acceptable level of service as identified in a Traffic Impact Analysis. Both the traffic fee and the fair share contribution shall be paid at the time of issuance of building permits. The additional circulation improvements shall consist of the following: Developer shall prepare Prior to approval City's Engineering and submit to the City for of Final Tract Dept. review and approval Map. drainage plans. Payment of tra~c fees to Prior to issuance City's Engineering the City by the developer. of building Dept. 2/8/')8 (R. \CRG730',FEIR~41TM()N FN I.) Date Remarks K-2 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures TRAFFIC (Continued) · Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard- Modify the eastbound and westbound approaches be modified to include a third through lane in each direction on Foothill Boulevard as well as convert the eastbound fight turn lane to a through plus fight turn lane. · Rochester Avenue/Highland Avenue - Signal phasing of the existing traffic signal shall be upgraded to accommodate the illlure traffic volumes. · Rochester Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - Signal phasing of the existing traffic signal shall be upgraded to accommodate the future Irafile volumes. · Rochester Avenue/Base Line Road - Signal phasing of the existing tfa[]Jc signal shall be upgraded to accommodate the future traffic volumes. · Day Creek Boulevard/Highland Avenue.. The following is recommended mitigation for this intersection: [Monitoringand]Monitoring]Responsible] Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Construction of a northbound left turn lane, Addition of a second northbound through lane and a shared through plus fight turn lane, Construction of a southbound left [ul'n lane, Date , [ i{cmarks · xCRG730~FEIR~41TMON. FN I.) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIgONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-O1 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMS~NDMI~NTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDI$ON COMPANY Mitigation Measures TRAFFIC (Continued) Addition of a second southbound through lane and a shared thtouBh plus right mm lane, Construction of eastbound left turn lane, Addition of an eastbound through plus right mm lane, Construction of a ~sthound left mm lane, and Addition of a westbound through plus right turn lane. · Day Cr~k Boulevard/Base Line Road - The followin8 is recommended mitigation for this intersection: Construction of dual northbound left turn lanes, Addition of second and third northbound through lanes, Construction of a northbound right turn lane, Construction of dual southbound left toro lanes, Addttion of second and third southbound through lanes, Construction of a southbound right mm lane, Construction of dual eastbound left mm lanes, Addition of a third castbound through lane, Construction of an eastbound right mm lane, Construction of dual westbound left turn lanes, Addition of a third westbound through lane, and Construction of a westbound right turn lane. 2/8/98(R:~CRG730~FEIR~IITMON FNL) I Monitorin8 aml I Moaitoeing [ Responsible Initials Date Remarks MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-0 I/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures TRAFFIC (Continued) · Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - The following is recommended mitisation for this intersection: Construction of dual northbound left turn lanes, Addition of a second and third northbound through lanes, Construction of a northbound free right turn lane, Construction of dual southbound left turn lanes, Addition of second and third southbound through lanes, Construction of a free southbound right turn lane, Construction of dual castbound left turn lanes, Addition of an eastbound through plus right turn lane, Construction of a westbound left turn lane, Addition of a fourth westbound through lane, and Construction of a westbound free right mm lane. · Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road - The eastbound and westbound approaches shall be modified to provide a third through lane in each direction on Base Line Road. · 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road - Addition of a second westbound left turn lane (dual left turn lane) for on-ramp traffic at the westbound approach and a sot, thbound free right turn for off-ramp traffic. Reporfin~ Process Mil_,~t_ ones Party Initials Date Remarks 2-~, . ,~:\C~G730WEIRXMI'I~ION FN I ) -~ MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-O3B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-OI/EDiSON COMPANY Mitigation Measures TRAFFIC (Continued) · 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard - Conversion of the Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials eastbound right turn lane to a free right turn lane to accommodate on-ramp traffic. · East Avenue/Base Line Road - As mitigation for this intersection, it is recommended that the westbound approach include a third through lane. 4.2.1{L Circulation improvements have been identified to achieve standards levels of service {i.e., local jurisdiction and/or SANBAG) at study area intersections. To address the timing, fi. mding, and implementation of Ihese improvements, the following mitigation measure or condition of General Plan Amendment approval is recommended. · Prior to the approval of any tract map, a The developer shall traffic study shall be completed to submit to the City for determine whether the incremental review and approval a increase in traffic from the tract map tralIic study. area causes any of the intersections under investigation to result in unsatisfactory levels of service. !f unacceptable levels of service result, this tra~c analysis shall determine the portion of the ultimate intersections' improvements that are required, the phasing of the improvement, and the funding source. 4.2.2. The project shall contribute on a fair The developer shall share basis to the cost of providing the provide evidence to the following freeway lane additions~ City of compliance with the Congestion · 1-15 between Jurupa Street and 1-10 - Management Agency. two lane mainline laues in each direction. 2/BDS( R :\CRG730~FEIRq~ilTMON . FN I.) Prior to approval City's Engineering of any tentative Dept. tract map. Prior to approval City's Engineering of Final Tract Dept. Map. Date Remarks K-6 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMliNTS 96-01 AND 97-OI/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures TRAFFIC (Continued) · 1-15 between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard - two mainline lanes in each direction, AIR QUALITY 4.3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construct/on Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.3. lB. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3. ID. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic anti minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained Io maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways xCRG730~FEI R~MITMO N F N I.) [ Monitoring and [ Monitoring [ Responsible ] Reporting Process l~11eatome$ Party Initials Applicant shah submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Prior to issuance City's Building & of grading Safety Dept. permits. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. Prior to issuance City's Building & of grading Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. Prior to issuance City's Building & of grading Safety Dept. Applicant shah pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. Prior to issuance City's Building & of grading Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. Date MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 ANt) VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-0I AND 97-0 I/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures Monitoring and [ Monitoring I Responsible I Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials AIR QUALITY (Continued) 4.3.1E. The Constrtnction Contractor shall Applicant shall sulknit to support and encourage ridesharing and the City proof that the transit incentives for the construction crew. mitigation listed is Tile Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4.3.2A. Dust generated by the development activities shall Ix- retained ou site and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures Itsled below. a I)uring clearing. grading, earth moving, excavation, or Iransl~}rtation ol cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be nsed to preven! dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. During consInaction, waler Irz~ck.s or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement clamp enough to prevent dust from leaving Ihe site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down snch areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Prior to issuance City's Building & of grading Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. Prior to issuance City's Building & of grading Safety Dept Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by Cily. Field inspections City's Building & during grading. Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay Prior to issuance for mitigation of grading monitor hired by permits. City. Field inspections during grading. Date Remarks 2/B/~)8 ( R \CRG 730~FEIR~M I'I'M( ) N INI.) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-O3B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures AIR QUALrrY (Continued) c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation i~ completed, the entire area of disturbed. soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed ~o that dust generation will not occur. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. 4.3.3. The Construction Contractor shall utilize as much as possible precoated/ natural colored building materials, water- based or Iow-¥OC coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or Sl~nge. ] Monltorin~ and [ Monltoring Responsible] Report~ Proteas !alliestinieR Party Initials Applicant shaU submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed la included in the construction documents with the devedoper'm contractor. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall ~uhmit to the CAty peoof that the mlU~afion listed i1~ construction documents with the developer's contractor. Prior to issuance Building & Safety of grading Dept. permits. Applicant shall pay Field inspections for mitigation duril~ iwacling. monitor hired by City. Prior to l~uance Building & Safety of Braeling Dept. Applicant shall pay Field inspections for mitigation durtn_$ ~rading. monitor hired by City. Prior to l~mance Building & Safety of grading Dept. Applicant shall pay Field inspections for mitigation during liracling. monitor hired by City. Prior to issuance Building & Safety of building Dept. permil~. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by' City. Date R{*lnarks 2/B/~)8( R :\CRG730~ EIRqM ITMON FNL) K-9 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMitNDMliNT$ 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Monitoring and Mitigation Measures Reportin8 Proceaa AIR QUALITY (Continued) 4.3.4A. The project shall comply with Title The applicant shall 24 of the California Code of Regulations iwepare and submit I Monitoring ] Responsible [ MIJ~(~,es P~W initials Prior to isauance Building & Safety of Imlldh~ Dept. established by the Energy Commission regarding energy conservation standards. The project applicant shah incorporate the following in building plans: · Planting trees to provide shade and shadow to building; · Solar or low-emission water heaters shah be used with combined space/water heater unit; * Refrigerator with vacuum power insulation; . Double-pained glass or window treatment for energy conservation shall be used in all exterior windows; and · Energy-efficient low-sodium parking lot lights shall be used. 4.3.4B. Use of transportation demand The applicant shall measures (TDM) such as preferential prepare and submit to park/ng for vanpooling/carpooltng, subsidy the City flor review and for transit pass or vanpooling/carpooling, flextime w~rk schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and OhSitc cafeteria shall be incorporated in the design of the commercial land uses. 4.3.4C. The project proponent shall determine with the City and the electrical purveyor if it is feasible to pre-wire houses for electrical charges for EV cars and/or optic fibers for home offices. If feasible, install EV charges and/or optic-fibers per the electrical purveyor's direction prior to Certilicate of Occupancy. buildifig plans to the City permits. for review and approval that ~ontaln the llated miti81tkm. appmaral development plato that incorporate the listed TDM meamrea. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. Prior to bsuance Building & Safety of Imiklii~ Dept. ~' Planning Dept. The applicant shall Prior to issuance Planning Dept. submit to the City written of a certificate of evidence that he]she has occupancy. consulted with the electrical purveyor and the City. 2/8.. ,CRG73OWEIR~VIITMON FNL) Date Remarks & MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Monitoring and Mitigation Measures Reporting AIR QUALITY (Continued) 4.3.4D. Install EV charges or electrical fuel The developer shall stations/natural gas for community wide use prepare and sul~nit to at key commercial and public location(s) the City for review and such as park and ride lots, Metrolink approval building plans Station, and commercial centers. that incorporate the mitigation. 4.3.4E. The developer shall contract with a The developer shall mitigation monitor to assure compliance and implementation with the mitigation monitoring program. NOISE 4.4.1A. During all project site excavation and grading on-site, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. 4.4. lB. The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors to the east of the site. submit to the City evidence that the developer has contracted with a mitigation monitor to implement the mitigation monitoring pro~ram. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. 2/B/98 ( R :\CRG 730~FEIE~4 I'FM( )N FNI.) ]Monitoring]Responsible] M~ileatosnes Party Initials Prior to issuance Building & Safety of building Dept. permits for any commercial building. Field inspections Building & Safety prior to issuance Dept. of a certificate of occupancy. Planning Dept. Prior to Issuance Planning Dept. of grading permits. Prior to issuance of gradlng Prior to issuance of grading permits. Field inspections during grading. Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. Building & Safety Dept. Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. Date Re'marks 6 K-11 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures NOISE (Continued) 4.4.1C. The construction conlractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors to the east of the site during all project construction. 4.4. ID. During all project site construction, the construction coniractor shall limit all conslruction-related activities that would result m high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 am. and 8:00 p m Monday through Saturday, unless such construction activities do not result in noise levels exceeding 45 dBA at residences to the easl of the site. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. Applicatit shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that the mitigation listed is included in the construction documents with the developer's contractor. 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be The applicant shall submitted to the Cily for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 408 feet of Base Line Road centerline; · Within 770 feet of Foothill Boulevard centerline; · Within 337 feet of Day Creek Boulevard centerline between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; · Within 438 feet of Day Creek Boulevard cenlerline between Base Line Road and Church Sireel; and · Within 344 feet of ttighland Avenue centerline. submit noise studies to the City for review and approval for the listed residential units. Prior to i~suance Building & Safety of grading De pt. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by city. Prior to l$$uance Prior to issuance of of gradinS grading permits. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by Cily. Prior to approval Planning Dept. of Final Tract Map. Applicant shall pay for mitigation monitor hired by City. 2/8/.. , . xCRG730~FEIR~l!TMON FNI.) Date Rentarks MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures NOISE (Continued) Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. PUBLIC SERVICES Schools 4.5.1A. A school mitigation plan shall be The developer shall enacted between the ESD and the submit to the City a copy developer to provide for a per dwelling unit of a school mitigation fee rate for the residential t~rtion o[ the plan executed between project site. The fees will offset the the developer and the additional demand placed on school district Etiwanda School District. facilities by the residential l:~rtion of the project 4.5.1B. The developer shall join charley School District Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No.2 (CFD No. 2), m order to provide an alternative method to finance the mitigation of school impacts of development. Reporthag Process Milestones Party Initials 4,5.1C, The developer shall be required to execute an agreement with ESD and CJUIISD to provide adequate mitigation. Such an agreement shall be executed prior to Planning Commission approval for any residential project within the General Plan Amendment area. Actual implementation of the agreement by the payment of fees, dedication of sites or other mitigation will take place as building permit~ are obtained. Prior to the Building & Safety issuance of Dept. building permits for any residential unit. The developer shall Prior to the submit to the City written issuance of proof that the developer has ~oined the Chaffey School District Mc!!o- Roos Community Facilities District No.2 (CID No. 2). The developer shall submit to the City a copy of the executed agreement between the ESD and CJUHSD. building permits for any residential unit. Planning Dept. Prior to Planning Planning Dept. Commission approval for any residential unit. Date 2/8/98(R:\CRG730~FEIR~VlITMON FN i.) MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMIiNDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY IMonitoring and Mitigation Measures Reporttn.o Procea$ PUBLIC SERVICES - S~ooi$ (Co~tinuml) 4.5.1D. In the event that the developer ira mitigation algreement declines to execute a mitigation agreement, t$ not executed, the the City shall require full mitigation as a developer shall form a condition of approval. Full mitigation shall Mello-Roo$ Community be accomplished by means of a requirement Facilities District. to form a MeHo-Roos Community Facilities district for $chool facilities. In order to reduce the burden on the future homeowners, it is possible to structure the community facilities district such that some of the special taxes would be prepaid by the developer. Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to The developer shall Municipal Code Chapter 16.32 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational !and in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 11.3 acres of parkland either by fee or by dedication. 4.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 11.3 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. if the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan Amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. execute an agreement with the City to dedicate parkland or pay in lieu fees as determined by the City's Park and I~tlon Conunimsion. ] Mmait~eing ] Responsible Mileatomes Party Initials Prior to Iq~ning Planning Dept. Commission approval ~or any realdenllal unit. Prior to approval Planning Dept. of ~ F~! Tract Map/ Parks & Recreation Dept. The City Park and At the time of Recreation Commission filin~ a tentative shall determine whether tract map or a dedication of property for minor 11.3 acres of park and subdivision plat recreational put'po~ or for approval in lieu of fees are nece~ary. The developer shall submit an application for a General Plan Amendment for the location of any parks. Parks & Recreation Dept. Planning Dept. ,CRG73OXJ:EIR~IITMON FNI.) Date Remarks MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 ^NI} ¥1CTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Monitoring and Mitigation Measures Reporting Process PUBILC SERVICES - Recreation (Continued) 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and The developer shah accepted it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Sul~livision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building pe rm i t s 4.5.2.(2). The parkway on the east side of "fulure" Day Creek Boulevard shall be ]Monitoring[Responsible Milestones Party Initials Prior to issuance Building & Safety either execute a of building Dept. dedication agreement permits. with the City or pay Parks & Recreation established fees. Dept. The developer shall submit to the City for widened by 20 to 25 feet to provide a muhi- review and approval a use trail from Highland Avem,c south to trails plan for the Icrminate at the City's aduh sports complex. parkway on the east side Six. elf it design of the trail shall be of Day Creek Boulevard determined by the City at Ihe time incorporating the stated development plans are submitted l~r review mitigation, and :q}proval for any developmcut proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shall lie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. Police 4.5.3A. As stated in the General Requirements and Approvals for the Police Department for the City, a signed consent and waiver form to joiu and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Eacililies District shall be filed with City Engineering prior to final map approval or the issuance of b.dding permits, whichever occurs first fi~r any projects within the project area I~.lwcen !tighland Avenue and I-15 Formation costs shall I~- t~rnc by the Devch~per. Prior to approval Planning Dept. of any development Parks & Recreation plans adjacent to Dept. Day Creek Bou~vard. The developer shall sign a Prior to issuance Engineering Dept. consent and waiver form of building to join and/or form the permits. Law Enforcement Community Facilities District. A copy of the signed form shah be submitted to the City's Engineering Department. Date Remarks 2.8~)8{R ',{ R(;730 }:! II{M I'M(}N INI } ~ MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONM!!NTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMIgHTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures PUBLIC SERVICES (Continued) 4.5.4A. The developer shah join the Mello- Roos Community Facilities District to provide fire protection services to the site. 4.5.4B. The developer shall install automated fire sprinkler systems in commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential units in accordance with Foothill (Rancho Cucamonga) Fire Protection District Ordinance No. I$ and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 22. AESTHETIC/VISUAL 4.6. IA. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed development plans.. 4.6. lB. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard shall be no more than eight feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for this Scenic Corridor, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a conclition of approval by the City Planning Departnmnt prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Bot!levard Reporting Process if air Iodue$ Party Initials The developer shall join a Prior to issuance Fire Dept. Mello-Roos Community of buildIn8 Facilities District for fire permits. protection. The developer shall submit to the City for review and approval building plans that include automated fire sprinkler systems. Prior to issuance Fire Dept. of building Building & Safety Dept. The developer shall submit to the City for review and approval development plans for structures within 100 feet from Day Creek Boulevard The developer shall submit to the City for review and approval development plans for noise walls along Day Creek Boulevard. Prior to approval Planning Dept. of any development plans for Building & Safety structures within Dept. 100 feet from Day Creek Prior to approval Planning Dept. of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard. Date Remarks 2/h \CRG730~FEIRXMITMON FNI.) ,{~ MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Monitoring and Mitigation Measures Reporting Process AESTHETIC/VISUAL (Continued) 4.6. IC. The City Planning Department The City shall amend the shall amend the Community Design Criteria Community Design Part II of the Victoria Community Plan at the Criteria Part II of the time of filing tentative map or minor Victoria Community Plan subdivision plat for its "recommended edge per the stated mitigation. conditions" for future Day Creek Boulevard to show a similar landscape and setback treatment on both the east and west sides of Day Creek Boulevard. While a row of palm trees is now recommended for the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, this proposed landscaping shall be enhanced by short and tall drought-tolcran! shrubs adjacent to sound walls to reduce the visual impacts of such walls. 4.6.1D. Landscape requirements shall be The developer shall eslablished for the far southern end of the submit to the City for project site to screen new development review and approval from the view of motorists akmg I-1 $ landscape plans for any looking north. However, this landscaping development in the area should also allow views north towards the of 1-15. mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of !-15. 4.6.2. The Design Review process for The developer shall commercial establishments shall ensure that submit to the City for no significant light or glare impacts shall review and approval result from the proposed project. Specific development plans that issues to be evaluated at the time of design indicate the type and review shall include the following: location of exterior proposed exterior lighting and landscaping lighting. of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use o{ shielding on exterior lights to focus hght onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. )./B ~)8( R:\CRG730',FEIR~MITMON FNI,) Monitoring Responsible I Milestones Party Initials Prior to filing of Planning Dept. filing tentative map or minor subdivision plat. Prior to approval Planning Dept. of any development plans for development Parks & Recreation adjacent and in Dept. the vicinity of 1- 15. Prior to development plan approval by the Clty's Design Review Committee. Planning Dept. Date Remarks K-17 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AM!INDMENTS 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY Mitigation Measures AESTHETIC/VISUAL (Continued) 4.6.3A. Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plan. s shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major totersections along future Day Creek Boulevard. Such provisions may inclnde the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. 4.6.3B. To reduce potential conflicts with policies of the City's Community Design Element, recommended mitigation measures found under 4.6.1 shall also be implemented. 4.6.3C. The Community Design Criteria The City shall amend the Part II of the Victoria Community Plan shall Community Design be amended immediately following project Criteria Part !I of the approval to address new uses proposed as Victoria Community Plan part of the project. Itowever, as part of this pet' the stated mitigation.. amendment, some requirements shall be incfuded to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches that proposed by the Victoria Community Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east- west corridor's, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensnring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low- growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the project site. Reporting Process Mt _l~tomes Party Initials The developer shah Prior to approval Planning Dept. submit to the City for of development review and approval plans by the landscape plans for major City's Design intersections along Day Review Creek Boulevard. Committee. Prior to issuance Planning Dept. of buiidin~ Prior to approval Planning Dept. of tentative tract map. 2/8,. ,CRG730\FEIR~MITMON I'NL) Date Remarks MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B AND 97-01 AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMi~NT$ 96-01 AND 97-01/EDISON COMPANY 'Monitoring and Mitigation Measures RepoSing ~ CULTURAL RESOURCES 4.8.1. in conjunction with the submittal of The applicant shall applications for rough grading permits, the applicant shall p~ovide written evidence to the Community Development Department that an archaeologist, listed on the County of San Bernardino list of qualified archeologists, has been retained and will be present on site during all rough grading and other significant ground disturbing activities. The archeologist shall meet with the Community Development Department to review procedures to be used during such activities. provide ~vitten evilnee to the City that an archeolol~l has been retained to be present during Ilradiog act~ties. ]Monitoring]Responsible Milestones Party Initials Prior to i~uance Planning Dept. of any I!t~dtng Date Remarks 2/B?)8 ( R :\CRG730~FEIR~,M ITMON FNL) K-19 NUMBER OF STUDENTS GENERATED FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Low Density (2-4 DUIAC) 10.8 43 43 43 19 Low-medium Density (4-8 DUIAC) 17.8 142 142 142 62 Medium Density (8-14 DU/AC) 8.3 116 66 . ~ ~ . ~ ~, ,~ ,~,~'~ . Area Between Base Line Road and 1-15 116 50 19 19 8 8 8 62 62 28 28 28 Medium Density (8-14 DUIAC) 7.4 104 59 104 45 26 45 Medium-high Density (14-24 DUIAC) 8.6 206 69 120 90 30 52 High Density (24-30 DUIAC) 4.8 144 38 67 i:~!~!~;:~'.~i-~!~!~:~:i[i?~.i~i"' ~ ~' ' ' ' -': ': ~ ' :, ' : I. Highest density level used to calculate Dwelling Units Per Acre. :2. 4. 16 29 257 I · 9 9 9 28 28 28 23 13 23 Student Generation Rates for the Eftwanda School ~ K-5 ~1.4343 ~ unit. Student Generation Rates for the Eftwanda School Dislfict 6-8 ~ .1934 ~ unit. Student Generation Rates for the Chaffey Joint Union High School Distllct for 9-12 @ .2000 per unit. 2O 11 2O 40 13 23 28 7 13 146I 80I 11~ 21 12 21 41 14 24 29 8 13 .... ::: ::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~!:~ii!::!ii;!i!i!i!~ii!i~:~: .... 151 84 118 EXHIBIT I RESOLUTION NO ¢~--~/~/~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDrv~NT 96-03B AND 97-01. AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 96-01 AND 97-01 WITH A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-091-41, 227-201-33, 227-351-65, 227-393-01 AND 02, AND 229-021-56. A. Recitals. 1. A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been presented to this Council in conjunction with the Council's consideration of the General Plan Amendment 96-03B and 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-01 and 97-01. 2. The Final EIR referred to in this Resolution consists of that document dated February 12, 1998, entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report General Plan Amendment 96-03B and 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-01 and 97-01 ." 3. The public comment pedod for the EIR was duly and lawfully closed on March 25, 1998, .following due notices to the public and all applicable public agencies. 4. On March 11, and continued to March 25, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and on March 25, 1998, adopted Resolution No. 98-15, recommending that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report and adopt a Statement of Oveniding Considerations. 5. On April 15, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Re~olution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public heanng on Apdl 15, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and the consideration of the contents of the Final EIR in reviewing the approval of General Plan Amendment 96-03B and 97-01 and Victoda Community Plan Amendment 96-01 and 97-01, this Council hereby takes the following action with respect to the EIR: a. Certify that the Final EIR has been prepared for General Plan Amendment 96-03B and 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan 96-01 and 97-01 in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resource Code Sections 21000 et seq. ("CEQA") with the state and City Guidelines for implementing CEQA, and all other applicable laws and regulations. b. Adopt a Statement of Facts of Findings for the EIR and a Statement of Overriding Considerations attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and "B" respectively, based on the following findings: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. EIR FOR GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 April 15, 1998 Page 2 1) ..The facts and findings set forth in the Statement of Facts of Findings and Statement of Overridin!:j Considerations are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record and the Final EIR. 2) The Final EIR has identified all significant environmental Impacts of the project and there are no known potentially significant environmental impacts not addressed in the Final EIR. 3) All significant impacts identified in the Final EIR as a result of the project have been mitigated, avoided or reduced to an acceptable level by the imposition of mitigation measures on the project. These mitigation measures are attached hereto as part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program and are incorporated herein by this reference. 4) The Final EIR has considered a reasonable range of alternatives to the project. Potential mitigation or project alternatives have not been incorporated into the project because they might impede on the project objectives or create other significant environmental, economic, social impacts, or are determined to be infeasible based on the consideration set forth in the Statement of Facts of Findings. 5) The cumulative impacts of the project in relation to other projects in the area have been considered. Except for the one identified unavoidable impact described in the Statement of Facts of Findings and the Final EIR, mitigation measures are incorporated into the project to reduce such impacts to less than significant levels. 6) The unavoidable significant impact of the project as identified in the Statement of Facts of Findings and the Final EIR is outweighed by the economic, social, and other benefits of the project identified in the Statement of Overriding Considerations. 7) Pursuant to provisions of the California Public Resources Code Section 21089 (b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final until the Notice of Determination (NOD) is filed and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bemardino and all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bemardino. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated there under, condition shall be deemed null and void. 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. LSA .Associates. Inc. EXHIBIT A STATEMENT OF FACTS AND FINDINGS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B & 9'5-01 .AND VICTORIA COMMU- NITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 & 97-01/EDISON COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT INTRODUCTION The following statement of findings and facts in support of findings is adopted for each environmental impact identified in the FEIR as significant or potentially significant. For a more detailed description of each impact, each mitigation measure to be imposed, and the facts and data which support the conclusions reached herein regarding the significance of each impact after mitigation, please refer to the applicable sections of the FEIR and the technical appendices. The City Council hereby adopts and incorporates the data and analysis set forth therein as a part of this Resolution as though set forth here in full. L Description of Project Objectives The proposed project is an amendment to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Victoria Community Plan. The area of the proposed amend- ments are designated as Utility Corridor. Southern California Edison, who owns the property, is the applicant and proposes to change the Utility Corridor designation to Regional-Related Comm~/~[ and Regional Center, and High Residential, Medium High Residential, Medium Residential, Low-Medium Residential, and Low Residential There is no development proposed for the site at th/s t/me. Project O~ec~ves To preserve the single family character of residential neighborhoods within the City and provide a variety of housing types for various income levels. To protect the neighborhood quality and residential nature of the neighborhood to the east. To provide infill residential and commercial development within the context of a planned community. 11. Evaluation of Alternatives For purposes of analyzing potential environmental impacts, the ErR evaluated the proposed project and four alternatives. The four alternatives evaluated are the No Project Alternative (as required by CEQA), Open Space Park Greenbelt and Trails System Alternative, Lower Density, and Off-Site Alternative. 5/18/98(R:\CRG750~FEIBWlNDINGSWINDI~GS .WPD) I_~A Associates, Inc. These Statement of Facts and Findings address the proposed project as the alternative to be considered for approval bv the Cirv of Rancho Cucamonga. pursuant to staffs recommendation. Characteristics of the preferred alternative are provided herein. The f~lowing is a brief description of the ahematives considered, see Section 6 of the FEIR for more detail. Environmm~!~!~ $upm'ior Aitm'native The No Project/No Development Alternative is an Environmentally Superior alternative since no development would occur on the project site. Urdike the proposed project or the project alternatives, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not increase demand for public services, increase traffic volumes, circulation, air emkssion$ and noise levels (a&sociated with construction and operation of additional land uses), cause the additional need for recre- ational facilities, or increase potential impacts to biological or cultural resources, drainage, and aesthetics that may otherwise result from development of the project site. Significant short-term construction emissions would be elimirrored, and significant unavoidable long-term CO, ROC, and NOx emissions would be reduced with the No Project/No Development Alternative. As required by CEQA (Section 15126(d)(4), if the No Project/No Development Alternative is selected as the environmentally superior alternative, the EIR shall tires. Amon~ the altr~m~l~ considered, the Open Space ~t and Trails System Mtemat~ has the kmst rJ~n~ enviro~m,~r~i imlmm. Of the viable alternatives, the open space/trails system alternative would veault in fewer daily and peak hour vehicle trips and contammant emissions, and incremental into in ambient noise levels, and impacre on schools and parIra. Potential long-term local air quality impacts are considered sig~if~-~nt una-void~ble ~ impacts under either the proposed project or the Lower Density and Off-Site Alternatives. The Open Space Greenbelt and Trails System Alternative, however, superior to all other alternatives. There are economic impacts to the City with the implementation of the Open Space Greenbelt and Trails System Alternative. If the site is to be converted to an open space/tra~ system, the City would have to 1) purchase the property, 2) construct the trail system, and 3) provide long-term maintenance of a trail system on the 84.15-acre site. The cost to purchase the property, and construct and maintain the trails may cause an additional financial burden on City residents depending on how the City chooses to provide funding. In light of Proposition 218, additional use taxes would have to go to Citywide vote. Long-term funding for a City trail system on this site is not certain. Under th~ No PvoNt-~v~o-Development Alternative, the project site would remain in its existing vacant condition. The site could contain electric transmission 3/18/98(R:\CRG730~FEmWINDINGSWIND E~IGS.WPD) / ¢~ L~A Associates, Inc. towers tn the future under the current zoning; however. for the purposes of the "No Development Mternatives" analysis, the no development scenario is analyzed. Evaluation of the/Vo Project Alternative The No Project/No Development Alternative would reduce and/or eliminate all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed project. In particular, significant adverse impacts related to short-term construction emissions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for daily operations by a large margin (especially NOx), would not occur with this alternative. However, this alternative would result in impacts by eliminating opportunities to provide housing and, thereby, meet the goals of the City's General Plan Housing Element. This alternative would fail to meet three important objectives of the project and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The first objective is to preserve the single family character of residential neighborhoods within the City and provide a variety of housing types for various income levels; the second objective is to protect the neighborhood quality and residential nature of the neighborhood to the east; the third objective is to provide Brill residential and commercial development within the context of a planned community. Op~rn Spaco Park ~lt and Trails $ystom ~vo This alternative is a rational choice as a land use alternative for a long slender 84.15-acre parcel (330 feet wide by 10,756 feet long). Thia strip of land would contain a landscaped parkway along the length of future Day Creek Boulevard to enhance views of Mt. Baldy to the north and would also contain a trails system that would connect the existing and future planned residential areas in the Victoria W'mdrows area to the east and west of future Day Creek Boulevard (south of Highland Avenue and north of Base line Road) to the proposed regional commercial area south of Base Line Road and north of 1-15. Evaluation of the Open Space Park Greenbelt and Trails System Alternative The Open Space Park Greenbelt and Trails System Alternative would have less significant adverse environmental impacts than that of the proposed project discussed in Section 5.0 in the FEIR. In particular, significant unavoidable adverse impacts to local air quality would be reduced under this alternative. All other impacts of the proposed project would also be 'reduced under this alternative including impacts on public services, traffic, potential exposure of residences to noise related impacts, and aesthetics. 3/18/98(R: ~,CRG'~30'~FEIR'aglN DING S ~:IN D ING S WPDi LSA Associates. Inc~ Lower Density Alternative Under the Lower Density' Alternative. a General Plan and Victoria Community Plan amendment would be proposed that would be the same as proposed with the project between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road. However. the densi~es would be limited to the lower range v, athin each land use category {.i.e., Low Density [2 units/acre], Low-Medium Density [4 units/acre], and Medium Density [8 units/acre]). In the area south of Base Line Road, the land uses proposed would include 10.4 acres of Low-Medium Density (4 units/acre) from Base Line Road south to one-half the distance between Base Line Road and Church Street and Medium Density (8 units/acre) on 10.4 acres from one-half the distance between Base Line Road Church Street south to Church Street. The 27.7 acres south of Church Street would remain Regional Related Of- rice/Commercial as proposed with the project. The intent of this alternative is to potentially reduce the proposed proj6ct's impacts on public set,rices, specifically schools. .. Evaluation of the Lower Dengity Alternative The proposed project's impacts on air quality, traftic, fire, police, schools, and parks would be reduced with implementation of the Lower Density Alternative. There would be a slight reduction m vehicular traffic noise impacts with this alternative. The proposed project's impacts on drainage, biological resources, cultural resources, and aesthetics would remain the same with Lower Density Alternative. off. su~ man-n~ Section 15126(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requirea that an EIR consider only those feasible alternatives that would avoid or substantially lessen any of the signfficant impacts identified' for the project alternative. The General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Rancho Cucamonga allows development of residential uses in a number of areas primarily within the northerly portion of the City, in areas designated for a wide range of residential densities s'unilar to the proposed General Plan Amendments. SCE owns utility corridor easements to the north and south of the proposed project area that are actually an extension of the same utility easement as the proposed project. Potentially, the area that contains the utility easement north of Highland Avenue could be processed for a proposed General Plan Amendment to allow a variety of residential densities similar to the proposed project. Evaluation of the OfjC $ite Alternative Overall, the proposed project's impacts on drainage, traffic, noise, public services (fire, police, schools, and parks), biological resources, and cultural resources would remain the same with ~ alternative site. The significant unavoidable impacts on air quality would also be the same as with the proposed project since the air quality impacts of the proposed project are a result of operational vehicle emissions which would not be reduced with this alternative. 3/18D8(R:\CRG730WEIl~WI~DINGSWINDINGS.WPD) LSA Associates, Inc. Biological resources studies conducted for the proposed project concluded that no significant biological resources occur on site. It was determined that the proposed project would not have a significant impact on biological resources and no mitigation would be required. The off-s~te alternative would require biological resource surveys be conducted to determine whether the San Bernardino Menam's kangaroo rat and/or the California gnatcatcher, both protected species occur on site. This alternative does contain habitat of high quality that could support both species. Because of the high quality habitat that could support a protected species occurring on the off-site alternative, this would have a greater impact on biological resources than the proposed project. Impacts on aesthetics may potentially be the same with this alternative site. The alternative site is in the Eftwanda North Specific Plan which is similar to the Victoria Community Plan and also has.design guidelines which protect and enhance aesthetics and view corridors. In conclusion, an alternative site within an Edison utility corridor would have the same impacts as the proposed project and would not reduce the proposed projects' significant unavoidable long-term impact on air quality. EFFECTS DL~9~ffINED NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT OR MITIGATED TO A LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANT LEVEL Drainage Significant Eftoct No. 1 The proposed project would substantially increase the impervious surface coverage, resulting in an increase in the total quantity and rate of water d_raining from the site. Existing drainage systems to the east can not accommodate the increase and stormwater flow. The proposed project has the potential to have a significant impact on existing drainage facilities. Finding No. 1 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Fact~ in Support of Finding No. I The potential impacts pertaining to the total quantity and rate of water draining from the site have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than -significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EI1L Those measures will ensure that drainage from and through the site will be conveyed in a safe manner in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga engineering standards. 3/18/98(R:'~CRG'~30'~'E[RWINDINGS\.FIN DIN GS.WPD) /¢5 1.5A Associates, Inc ?mv development proposed between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road shall be conditioned to convey on-site drainage to the west to Day Creek Channel by storm drain systems in Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road. The developer shall amend the City's Final Master Plan of Drainage Report prior to Final Map approval to account for the change in land use from open space to residential uses. The developer shall study the existing 96-inch RCP stubout, located approximately 462 feet from Victoria Park Lane to determine its adequacy. Improvements shall be installed as required. Traffic and Circulation Signalcant Effect No. 2 Ten intersections are forecast to exceed the CMP LOS E standard under 2015 background plus project conditions in one or both peait hours. These are: Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Day Creek Boulevard/Highland Avenue Day Creek Boulevard/Base Line Road Day Creek Bouleva_rd~oothill Boulevard Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard 1-15 southbound ramps/Base Line Road 1-15 northbound ramps/Base Line Road 1-15 southbound ramps/Foothill Boulevard East Avenue/Base Line Road. Finding No. 2 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 2 The potential impacts pertaining to ten intersections exceeding the CMP LOS E standard under 2015 background plus project conditions in one or both peak hours have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than -significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described w~thin the Final EI1L The mitigation measures described below will enable the City, to implement its traffic fee program to fund off-site traffic improvements made as a result bf the project. The traffic fee program is the most practical and feasible approach to funding traffic mitigation measures in the vicinity of the project. The project proponent shall contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's adopted traffic fee program (Transportation Department 3/18/98(R :\CRG730~FEI~XFINDINGSXFINDINGS ,WPD) 6 /¢¥ LSA A~soclates, Inc. Addition of a third westbound through lane. and Construction of a westbound right turn lane. Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard. The following is recommended mitigation for this intersection: Construction of dual northbound left turn lanes, Addition of a second and third northbound through lanes, Construction of a northbound free right turn lane, Construction of dual southbound left turn lanes, Addition of second and third southbound through lanes, Construction of a free southbound right turn lane, Construction of dual eastbound left turn lanes, Addition of an eastbound through plus right turn lane, Construction of a westbound left turn lane, Addition of a fourth westbound through lane, and Construction of a westbound free right turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road. The eastbound and west- bound approaches shall be modified to provide a third through lane in each direction on Base lane Road. Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard. Addition of a southbound right rum lane and a third eastboundthrough lane. 1-15 Son!' ~'a ~ _ t' Ramip~iqootbtii ~ - Convet~on of the earnbound ~ mm lane to a free right turn lane m accom,',~o- EastAvem~lBa~Lin~Road- As mitigation for this intersection, it is ~nm,~ ~ tlmt the westbotmd approach include a third Circulation improvement~ have been identified to achieve standards levels of service (Le., local 'luriadiction and/or SANBAG) at study area intet~ectiotl~ To ~ the timins, f~indin~+ and implementation of these improvements, the foHowlng mitigation measure or condition of General Plan Amendmerit approval is recommended: Prior to the approval of any txact map, a traffic study shall be completed to determine whether the incremental increase in traffic fi'om the tract map area causes any of the intersections under investigation to result in unsatiafactory levels of service. If unacceptable levels of service result, this tra~c analysis shall determine the portion of the ultimate intersections' improve- menes that are required, the phasing of the improvement, and the funding source. 3/18/98 (R :\CRG730x& i=tlixFINDIN GSMqlNDD~GS .WPD) 8 I~A Associates, Inc. Significant Effect ~b. 3 The proposed project will contribute to deficiencies along the following freewav sections: · I-~$ between Jurupa Avenue and 1-10 · 1-15 between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. Finding No. 3 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 3 The potential tra~c impacts of the proposed project pertaining to deridenoes along the fie,~w-,ty section 1-15 between Jurupa Avenue and 1-10 and section 1-15 between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final ElK The mitigation measures described below will enable the City to collect fees on a fair share basis for freeway lane additions. The traffic fee program'is the most practical and feasible approach to funding traffic tniri~wntion measures in the vicinity of the The project shall contribute on a fair abase Iaaais to the cost of providing the following fi¢,.~r, zy lane additions: I-15 bctx. cx.n Jurupa Street and I-10 - two lane mainline lanes in each direction. 1-15 between 4th Street and Foothill Boulevagd - two mainline lanes m each direeUon. Air Qualt~y No. 4 Air quality impacts may occur during the site preparation including grading and equipment exhaust as it is used onsite. Major sources of emissions during this phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, as well as soil disturbances by grading and fiiliqg. Construction equipment emissions would exceed the SCAQMD daily thresholds for the criteria pollutant of NOx, which is 2.5 tons per quarter or 100 pounds per day. Emi.ssions of other criteria pollutants would be below the standards during construction. 3/18/98(R:q~IiG73OM' mltxFI1N-DINGS~ZlNDINGS-TM) /?7 IgA Associates, Inc Finding No. -i Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the proiect which mitigate or avoid the stgmficant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 4 The potential impacts pertaining to the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than. significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thea'eby decresa~g the size of the area pre~ each day, to minimiTe vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. o The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through tratlic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incen- tives for the construction crew. Sign~qcant Effect No. 5 During grading activities dust emission would exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 150 pounds per day. Finding No. 5 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment to the extent feasible. 3/18/98(R:'~CRG730'YEI~WIND IN GSWIND LNG S x~q~D ) 10 LSA Associates, Inc. Facts in Support of Finding No.5 The potential impacts pertaining to the emissions of dust during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the m~tigauon measures and project design described within the Fi'Ral EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. During dearrag, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transporta- tion of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all axeas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. C0 After dearrag, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the ~oil until the ~ is lmved o£ otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. e0 Trucka transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. $ig~m F~c~ No. 6 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions associated with architectural coatings are not calculated because there is no sufficient information available for emissions produced by the painting of residential and commercial facilities. VOCs produced during construction may be a potentially significant impact. Finding No. 6 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment to the extent feasible. 3/18~98 (R:~CRG730'~FElRWlNDINGSWIl~DIN G S .WPD) 11 lqq I~A Associates, Inc. Facts in Support of Finding No. 6 The potential impacts pertaining to the emissions of Volatile Organic Com- pounds (VOC) during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and projgc~ design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measure is as follows: The Construction Contractor shall utilize as much as possible precoated/natural colored building materials, water-based or 1ow-VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge. SignOrcant Effect No. 7 Vehicular trips asaociated with the proposed project would produce emissions that would exceed the SCAQMD daily thresholds for the criteria pollutant of CO, ROC, and NOx. Findings No. 7 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the sq. me-~,~t effects on the environment to the extent feasible; however, impacts of the operation of the proposed project remain significant and unavoidable after mitigation. In accordance with the require- ments of CEQ& the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Consider- ations and made findings regarding the benefits of the proposed project. Fa~ts in Support of Finding No. 7 The potential impac~ pertaining to the erni~ion$ of CO, ROC, and NOx have been reduced to the extent feasible; however, even after implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR, the impact is eonaidered significant and unavoidable. Further mitigation is technically and economically infeasible since, to some eartent, any major development project in the region will incrementally increase emissions. The mitigation measures are as follows: The project shall comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations established by the Energy Commission regarding energy conservation standards. The project applicant shall incorporate the following in building plans: Planting trees to provide shade and shadow to building; Solar or low-emission water heaters shall be used with combined space/water heater unit; 5/18/98(R:\CRG730WEIRWI1WDINGSWINDINGS.alIrPD) 12 LSA ~soclates, Inc. Refrigerator with vacuum power insulation: Double-pained glass or window treatment for ener~, conser~,a- tion shall be used in all ex~tenor windows; and Energy-efficient low-sodium parking lot lights shall be used. Use of transportation demand measures (TDM) such as preferential parking for vanpooling/carpoolmg, subsidy for transit pass or vanpooling/ carpooling, flextime work schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and onsite cafeteria shall be incorporated in the design of the commercial land uses. The project proponent shall determine with the City and the electrical purveyor if it is feasible to pre-wire houses for electrical charges for EV cars and/or optic fibers for home offices. If feasible, install EV charges and/or optic-fibers per the electrical purveyor's direction prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Install EV charges or electrical fuel stations/natural gas for community wide use at key commercial and public location(s) such as park and ride lots, Metrolink Station, and commercial centers. The developer shall contract with a mitigation monitor to assure compliance and implementation with the mitigation monitoring program. No/se SignOrcant Effect No. 8 Noise levels from grading and other construction activities for the proposed project may range up to 91 dBA at the dosest residences immediately to the east of the northern part of the project site between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road for very limited times when construction occurs near them. Finding No. 8 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Fac~ in Support of Finding No. 8 The potential impacts pertaining to noise levels from grading and other construction activities on nearby residences have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: During all project site excavation and grading on-site, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile. with 3/18/98 (R \CRG750,,FEIR',lelN DIN G S 'FLN D ING S WPD) 13 LSAAssociates, Inc. properly' operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufactur- ers standards. The project contractor shall place all stationan' construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors to the east of the site. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors to the east of the site during all project construction. During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a. ha. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless such construction activities do not result in noise levels exceeding 45 dBA at residences to the east of the site; No construction shall be allowed on Sunda~ and public holidaya. SignSant Eff~'t No. 9 Increases in. noise levels could result from project-related traftic on access roads leading to the project site, especially g~ven the higher noise generation associated with trucks. Project-related long,term vehicular trip increaaes are anr~p~ted to be moderate. The incremental traffic noiae level increases would be le~ than $igniticatlt. No si~ifi~t traffic noiae imp~"ts on off-site sensitive uses are anticipated. However, proposed on-site residential uses would potentially be ,.~oaed to traffic noise levels ~.~cee~iqg the 60 dBA Ldn standard recommended for residential uses. Finding No. 9 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 9 The potential impacts pertaining to exposing on-site residential uses to noise levels exceeding standards along area roadways have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: Within 408 feet of Base Line Road centerline. 3/18D8(R:\CRG730WF-a~q~[NDINGSWINDLNGS.WPD) 14 LSA Associates, Inc. Within -'0 feet of Foothill Boulevard centerline. Within 33- feet of Dav Creek Boulevard centerline betna, een Highland Avenue and Base Line Road. Within 438 feet of Day Creek Boulevard centerline between Base Line Road and Church Street. Within 344 feet of Highland Avenue centerline. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. Public Services Schools Significant Effect No. 10 As a result of the overcrowding in the classrooms of the Etiwanda and Chaffey School Districts, both districts have urged and continue to urge the City not to approve development applications unless adequate school facilities are available to serve the development project. Future development will generate more students for the already impacted school distrim. School mitigation plans would be enacted between the ESD/CJUHSD and the project developer providing for a per dwelling unit fee rate for the residential portion of the project site. Finding No. 10 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the signitleant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 10 The proposed project's impact on schools has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described w~thin the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follo~: A school mitigation plan shall be enacted between the ESD and the developer to provide for a per dwelling unit fee rate for the residential portion of the project site. The fees will offset the additional demand placed on school district facilities by the residential portion of the project 3 q 8D8 OR :',CRG 730'xFEIR~FLNDI~ GS'F IN D IN G S.'i~'PD ) 15 LSA Assoctates. Inc, The developer shall join Chaffev School District Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No.2 (CFD No. 2). in order to provide an alternative method to finance the mitigation of school impacts of development. The developer sh~l be required to execute an agreement with ESD and CJUHSD to provide adequate mitigation. Such an agreement shall be executed prior to Planning Commission approval for any residential project within the General Plan Amendment area. Actual implementation of the agreement by the payment of fees, dedication of sites or other mitigation will take place as building permit~ are obtained. In the event that the developer declines to execute a mitigation agree- ment, the City shall require full mitigation as a condition of approval. Full mitigation shall be accomplished by means of a requirement to form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities district for school facilities. In order to reduce the burden on the future homeowners, it is possible to structure the community facilities district such that some of the special taxes would be prepaid by the developer. Parks and Recreation SignOrcant FdTect No. ~1 The residential portion of the propo~-xl project would increa~ the demand for active ~ 841itie~ earning a sig~iRe'ant impact to park f~eiliti~. Rndtng No. 11 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the signilicant effeet~ on the environment. of Finding No. 11 The proposed project's impact on parks has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EI1L The mitigation measures are as follows: The developer shall be subject to Municipal Code, Chapter 16.32 set by' the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regula- tions for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 11.3 acres of parkland either by fee or by dedication. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Cornminion shall determine whether dedication of property for 11.3 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, 3/18/98(R:\CRG730qeEIRWIl~DINGSWINDINGS ~VPD) 16 LSA Associates, Inc. the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan Amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. Where dedication is offered and accepted it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. Significant Eftoct No. 12 The residential and commercial areas proposed would increase the demand for active recreational facilities causing a significant impact to trail use in the City. Finding No. 12 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Findin8 No. 12 The potenvinl impacta of the pro~.~ on trails have been eliminnted or reduced to a level of less-than '-m~nillcant t!~h ' .m~entation of the mitigation measure~ and project de~i~n ~:withi~ the Final EIR. The mitigation measu~ is as foHc~w: The parkway on the east side of "f~tu~" Day Cre~ Boulew~'d shall be widened by 20 to 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Highland Avenue south to terminate at the Cities adult spol~ comple~ Specific desisn of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time develop- ment plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "futu~" Day Creek Boulevard. The sp~ific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Maatea' Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. Po/~c~ Significant Effect No. 13 The proposed project will result in a potentially significant impact as an increase in demand for police services. An additional five police personnel would be required for the proposed residential and commercial development. 3/18D8 (R :\CRG730~ IeAIRxFINDINGSWIND INGS .WPD) 17 LSA Associates, Inc. Finding No. 13 Changes of alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts ~n Support of Finding No. 13 The potential impacts of the proposed project on police have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measure is as follows: As stated in the General Requirements and Approvals for the Police Department for the City, a signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with City Engineering prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first for any projects within the project area between Highland Avenue and 1-15. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. SignOrcant Fffoct No. 14 ~mp~c~ of the p~opas~~ pro~t on fir~ sex, vice for the City of Rancho Cucamon~ at~ poeeq~-~ s'.. ..... ' Based on the standard t~sponse ti,~e threshold of five minutes, and the projecfs location ndadw to Stations 3, 4, and 5, the site is anrieip,,ted to fall llrlithin th~ ,~-v~--4~inut~ f4i.sp~ -~ ~e crit~'ia. l~ No. 14 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mit~te or avoid the 'significant effects on the environment. Facts M stsp$ _-. t q( ~ No. 14 Ilhe potential impacts of the proposed project on fire services have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: The developer shall join the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District to provide fire protection services to the site. The City shall encourage cluster developments to provide for more 1oeali7ed and effective fire protection measures such as consolidation of fuel buildup and abatement, firebreak maintenance, fire fighting equipment access, and water service provisions. 3/18/98(R:XCiRG730~ IdIc~INDINGSWINDIN GS .WPD ) 18 LSA Associates, Inc. The developer shall install automated fire sprinkler svstems in commer- cial, industrial. and multi-family residential units in accordance with Foothill (Rancho Cucamonga) Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 15 and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 22. Aesthetics Significant Effect No. 15 The proposed project would replace an 84.15-acre undeveloped, open space corridor with residential and commercial uses, and would significantly alter existing and future view corridors. Finding No. 15 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effec~ on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 15 The potential visual impacts of the proposed project have been eliminated or reduced to a level of !ess-than-significant through implementation of the mitiKation mea~ur~ and project deaiga deacribed within the Final FIR. The New buildin~ within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountain$ for motorists ~ north. The City Pbmning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed development plans. o Noise w~11s along future Day Creek Boulevard shall be no more than eight feet tall to avoid a sense of ~ristml enclosure" for this Scenic Corndot, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscap- ing on the road side of the sound wall. Thia requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard. The City Planning Department shall amend the Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan at the time of filing tentative map or minor subdivision plat for its "recommended edge conditions" for future Day Creek Boulevard to show a s'tmilar landscape and setback treatment on both the east and west sides of Day Creek Boulevard. While a row of palm trees is now recommended for the west side of Day Creek Boulevard, this proposed landscaping shall be enhanced by short and tall drought-tolerant shrubs adjacent to sound walls to reduce the visual impacts of such wallg, 3f18/98 {~R:\CRG730~!~LR~rll~IDI~IGSWINDINGS.TM) 19 LSA A.vsociates, Inc. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However. this landscaping should also allow viexx5 north towards the mountains. using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard. The City Planning Department shall .... address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of 1-15. Significant Effect No. 16' New light and glare would be created by the addition of residences and commercial establishments in an area previously proposed as a utility corridor. The most significant glare would be generated by commercial uses at the southern end of the project site, especially in association with outdoor parking that may be lit at night and that would be visible from roadways such as the future Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard, as well as minor roads to the east of the project site such as Victoria Loop, Church Street, and Day Creek Boulevard East. Finding No. 16 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 16 The potential visual impacts of the proposed project by the introduction of additional light and glare into the project area have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIIL The mitigation measure is as follows: The Design Review process for commercial establishments shall ensure that no significant light or glare impam shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials axe minimized. Significant Effect No. 17 The project could conflict with policies of the City's General Plan Community Design Element and landscape recommendations found in the Victoria Community Plan. 5,,'18/98 (R: \C RG ,'73 O'~FEIRx,FL'qD IN G S"FIN D[N G S .WPD ) 20 I~A Associates, Inc. Finding No. 17 Changes or alterations have been required in. or incorporated into the proiect which mitigate or avoid the s~gnificant effects on the environment. Fact~ in Support of Finding No. 17 The potential conflict of the proposed project with the policies of the City's General Plan Community Design Element and landscape recommendations found in the Victoria Community Plan have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard. Such provisions may include the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommen- dations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. To reduce potential conflicts with policies of the City's Community Design Element, recommended mitigation measures found under 4.6.1 shall also be implemented. The Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately following project approval to address new uses proposed as part of the project. However, as part of this amend- ment, some requirements shall be included to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches that proposed by the Victoria Community Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low-growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the project site. Cultural Resources Significant Effect No. 18 The potential for historic human burials may be present in the portion of the project area that contains Site P1084--27H. 3/18/98(R:\CRG730,,FEIR~FINDlNGSWI~Dl~IGS.WPD ) 21 LSA Associates, Inc. Finding No. 18 Changes or alterations have been required in. or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 18 The potential impacts pertaining to disturbance of human remains during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EI1L The mitigation measure is as follows: In conjunction with the submittal of applications for rough grading permits, the applicant shall provide written evidence to the Community Development Department that an archaeologist, listed on the County of San Bernardino list of qualified agcheologists, has been retained and will be present on site during all rough grading and other significant ground disturbing activities. The archeologist shall meet with the Commullity Development Department to review procedures to be used during such activities.. If cultural materials are found, construction activity in the vicinity of the discovery shall be redirected until the archaeologist has assessed the significance of the find. If the site appears potentially eligible for the California R~gtrter of H~xwtc Rmourc~ and, ff impacts cannot be avoided, a testing program may be nece. ss~. Avoidance of the site by capping may suffice as ~ under some circumstances. Actual mitigation will be dependent on the magnitude of proposed impacts to rotact significant deposits. If human remains are discovered during these construction activities, the San Bernardino County Coroner will be contacted within 24 hours to identify the bone and establish its relative age. If the bone is prehistoric, a Native American representative will be consulted to participate in the disposition of the reinruns. 3/18/98(R:\CRG730WEIRWINDINGSWINDINGS WIH)) ~A Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT B STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-03B & 97-01 .AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS 96-01 & 97- 01/EDISON COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT INTRODUCTION The following Statement of Overriding Considerations in connection with the General Plan Amendments 96-03B & 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96-01 & 97-01/Edison Company EIR, and related discretionary actions (collectively referred to as the "Project") is hereby adopted by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council ("Council") pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et ~ ("CEQA"). CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance the economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks when deterrmning whether to approve the project. If the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered acceptable (CEQA Guidelines section 15093[a]). CEQA requires the agency to provide written findings (Fxhibit A) supporting the specific reasons for considerms a project acceptable when significant impacts are unavoidable. Such reasons must be ba~ed on substantial evidence in the'FEIRor elsewhere in the arlrnini.~ative record (CEQA Guidelines section 15093[b]). Those reasons are provided in this Statement of Overriding Considerations. The EIR has identified significant and unavoi0able adverse impacts that would result from the implementation of the proposed project. Operational emissions of the proposed project would result in a total of 851 lba./day of CO, 64 lbs./day of ROC, 136 lbs./day of NOx, 15 lbs./day of SOx, and 19 lbs./day of PM10. Among them, the emi~ions for CO, ROC, and NOx would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for daily operations by a large margin (especially NOx). Even after implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR, it is not guaranteed that the emissions would be reduced to below the significance thresholds. Therefore, the project's impact on air quality during daily operations would remain significant and unavoidable. The Council finds that the economic, social or other benefits of the Project outweigh all of the Project's significant and unavoidable impacts discussed in the Statement of CEQA Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and any other remaining significant effects found to be unavoidable including but not limited to the project's impacts on air quality. In making this finding, the Council has balanced the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts. The Council finds that each of the following benefits of the Project, independent of the other benefits, would warrant approval of the Project notwithstanding the unavoidable impacts of the Project. 3/19D8(R: \CRG730~FEIR~F[NDINGS~.STATEMEN WPD} LSA Associates, Inc. OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS All feasible mitigation has been proposed to reduce or avoid potentially significant impacts identified in the FEIR. and no additional feasible mitigation is available to further reduce all potentially significant mapacts to a level of insignificance. The adoption of the General Plan Amendments 96-03B & 97441 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96441 & 97-01/Edison Company are necessary to provide for the orderly growth and development of the area by providing policies, regulations, and guidelines that will guide further development m a manner consistent with the policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the desires of the community, and ensure provision of infrastructur~ improvements that are necessary to provide for adequate circulation, delivery of utilities, control of drainage, and disposal of wastewater. ~ The General Plan Amendments 96-03B & 97-01 and Vietom Community Plan Amendments 96-O1 & 97-01/F. di$on Company are necessary for the City to adequately control and regulate orderly development and help ensure that new development is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The General Plan Amendments 96-03B & 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amen,tments 96-01 & 97-01/Edison Company provides a eircolation atiom ~ ill a [:l~lll~lel~[ ~rt~:to~ ~ within the project area. The trails will connect the residential neishbo~ with the commeA'ci~ ~ ~ ~in the commulxity. The General Plan ~mendm,"nt~ 96-03B & 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96-01 & 97-01/Edison Company provides for health, salty, and w~lfare tlmaugh proper siting of public buildings/facilities, and by 'mcorporating federal, state, and local regulations pertaining to seismic safety design and construction. Although air quality impacts can be anticipated with any large-scale development of the subject property, the FEIR imposes feasible mitiga- tion measures that will reduce those impacts to the extent feasible m both the short and long-term. 3/19DS(R:XCllG730WEII~WIND I~IGS'~TATEMEN .WPD) 2 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 1~., 1998 CITY OF 1L&NCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GF~ERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 96-03B - SOUTHF:RN CALIFORNIA FDISON - Consideration of a request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), on 35.65 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; and the consideration by the City of alternative land use designation of Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between the Railroad Tracks and Base Line Road - APN: 227-091-41,227-393- 01 and 02, and 227-351-65. FNVIRONM!=NTAL ASS!=SSMI=NT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY P~AN AMFNr')MFNT 96-0! - SOUTHFRN CAIIFORNIA FDISON - Consideration of a request to amend the Community Plan to change the Development Distdct from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), on 35.65 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; the consideration by the City of alternative land use designation of Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between the Railroad Tracks and Base Line Road; and the consideration to modify the ultimate width of the parkway at the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard from 7 to 25 feet - APN: 227-091-41,227-393-01 and 02, and 227-351-65. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - Consideration of a request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from Utility Corridor (UC) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and I-15; and the consideration by the City of alternative land use designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between Base Line Road and Church Street - APN: 229-021-56 and 227-201-33. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 April 15, 1998 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENf~MENT 97-01 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - Consideration of a request to amend the Development District from Utility Corridor (UC) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and I-15; the consideration by the City of alternative land use designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between Base Line Road and Church Street; and the consideration to modify the ultimate width of the parkway at the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard from 7 to 25 feet - APN: 229-021-56 and 227-201-33. RELATED TO THE ABOVE ITEMS IS THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR). RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendments 96-03B and 97-01 and Victoda Community Plan Amendments 96-01 and 97-01 through the adoption of the attached resolutions and ordinances. BACKGROUND On March 25, 1998, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the proposed land use changes and receive public testimony. An attomey representing the property owner on the south side of Foothill Boulevard raised a concern with the mitigation of a 25-foot wide parkway requirement on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard. This issue will be addressed further in the report. At the conclusion of the public headng and their discussion, the Commission made the recommendations to the City Council as outlined below: ANALYSIS This section of the report summarizes the proposed amendments and the Commission's conclusions and recommendations. The detailed analysis of each application and its issues are contained in the attached Planning Commission staff report dated March 25, 1998. General Plan Amendment 96-03B and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-01: The land use amendments apply to the section of the project site between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road. ,It is divided into three areas for the purpose of land use discussion as shown in Exhibit "B" Areas 1 and 2 - between Highland Avenue and Abandoned Rail Line: The applicant requested land use designations of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for Areas 1 and 2 respectively. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 April 15, 1998 Page 3 Bo Comm/ssion recommendation,' Low and Low-Medium Residential as requested by the applicant'f2ecause the land use designations will provide density compatibility to the existing residences to the east. Area 3 - between Abandoned Rail Line and Base Line Road: The applicant requested land use designation of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for Area 3 as shown in Exhibit "B." The Commission considered the applicant's request and the alternative land use designation of Low-Medium Residential. Commission recommendation: Low-Medium land use designation. The detailed discussion of the alternative land use is contained in the attached March 25, 1998, Commission staff report. General Plan Amendment 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Ametldment 97-01: The proposed land use amendments apply to the section of the project site between Base Line Road south to 1-15 Freeway. It is divided into four areas for the purpose of land use discussion as shown in Exhibit "C." Area 1 - between Base ! ine Road and Church Street: The applicant requested a land use designation of High Residential (24-30 dwelling unit per acre). Commiesion recommendei~on: Medium Resk~mtial because the lend use designation will provide density compatibility to the existing and proposed uses to the east and sou~. The detailed discussion of the alternative land use i~ contained in the attached March 25, 1998, Commission staff report. Are-- ~ ~:FI :~ - betweert P-'-e ! irm R,,---I "-,xl Ch,,rch Str,,,*', The applicant requested land use designation of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for Area 2 and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for Area 3. Commission recommendation: Medium and Medium-High Residential as requested by the applicant because they will be compatible to the easterly land uses. The Con~n/ss/on acknowledged that the City will have another opportunity to review and con~iderthe ultimate land use pattern for this area because the City has received a new application that proposes to reduce the residential density. Are~, 4 - between Church Street and I-15 Freeway: The applicant requested a land use designation of Regional Related Office/Commercial consistent with the land use west and south of the site. Commission recommendation: Regional Related Office/Commercial because it will be compatible to adjacent commercial use. 25-Foot Wide P~,rkway at the Fast Side of Day Creek Roulevard: At the March 25, 1998, public hearing, an attorney representing the Leggio family, owners of the properties located south of Foothill Boulevard, voiced their concerns with the proposed widened parkway, specifically the portion of the street alignment that swings westward as shown in Exhibit "F." CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 April 15, 1998 Page 4 They were concerned that the increased w~dth for that stretch of Day Creek Boulevard would place a burden"on the property owner. Staff response: The only reason that a 7-foot parkway was identified in the Victoria Community Plan for the east side of Day Creek Boulevard was because of the Edison corridor. With the change in land use, the increased parkway width from 7 to 25 feet is proposed to mitigate the environmental impacts identified in the EIR, including the loss of open space and the view shed. The multi-purpose trail within the widened parkway is proposed to mitigate part of the air quality impact because the biking and hiking trail would encourage non-motorized trips along the corddor to and from the Adult Sports Complex on Rochester Avenue and other commercial uses along Day Creek Boulevard. The increase in parkway width will also provide a balanced appearance with the parkway width on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard. Staff responded at the meeting that the property owner would not loose additional land because the 45..foot building setback is measured from the curb instead of the property line. The 25-foot parkway will be within the 45-foot building setback as shown in Exhibit "E." With regards to the stretch of Day Creek Boulevard along side the I-15 Freeway, staff responded at the meeting that the final design of the parkway has not been established and the design for that stretch of the street will be reviewed with flexibility so that the property owner would not be burdened unnecessarily. The attomey was provided with copies of Exhibits "E" and "F." Commission ~: Approve increase in patfn~y wfdth to 2~ feet. Fnvironment=l Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the land use amendments. The environmental analysis is contained in the separate EIR staff report, which will be considered at the same hearing. The FIR includes a list of mitigation measures that will reduce the identified im~to W than ~il~,ir~ v.~ level ~ included is a monitoring program to ensure compliance with the m'~gation measures. The identified air quality impact cannot be m'~gated to a level of less than significant and a Statement of Overriding Considerations will have to be considered by the Council. This issue will be discussed in the related EIR staff report. FACTS FOR FINr31NC4: The Planning Commission recommended the Coundl make the following facts for findinga: The project site is suitable for the uses allowed in the proposed Land Use and Development District designations. The proposed amendments will have significant adverse impacts on the environment as described in the EIR, but the potential positive impacts of other environmental aspects will provide sufficient benefits, as listed in the Statement of Overriding Considerations attached to the proposed City Council Resolution to certify the EIR. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Plan and the Victoda Community Plan because they promote the goals and objectives for single family residential development and commercial development. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 April 15, 1998 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper,..the property was posted with three 4- by 8-foot public hearing signs, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site and within approximately 1,000 feet east of the project site between Highland Avenue and the abandoned rail line. A neighborhood meeting was conducted by staff on July 22, 1997 at the beginning of the EIR process; however, no residents attended. Respectfully submitted, Br~ City Planner BB:NF:taa Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit 'F" Location Map GPA 96-03B & VCPA 96-01 Existing and Proposed Land Use GPA 97-01 & VCPA 97-01 Existing and Proposed Land Use March 25, 1998 Planning Commission Staff Report 25' Parkway and Building Setback Drawing Day Creek Blvd. Alignment S/o Foothill City Council Resolutions for GPA 96-03B and 97-01 City Council Ordinances for VCPA 96-01 and 97-01 Land Use Amendment for Edison Utility Corddor (GPA 96-03B & GPA 97-01) (VPCA-96'--01-&--VPCA 97-01) EXHIBIT A ST. 0.57 0 0.57 1.14 Miles N W E S CITY OF RANCHO Ct'CA. MONGA GPA 96-03B & VCPA 96-01 $.B.C.F.C. Area1 Area 2 ,' ~ :/1 -.-B.,"~.e Llle RESIDENTIAL Low Densi~' (2..4 DU/AC) Low Medium Density (4-8 DU/AC) Medium Density (8,-14 DU/AC') .MH High Density. (24-30 DU/AC) COMMERCIAL CC Community Commercial CF Community Facility NC Neighborhood Commercial OP Office Park RC Recreational Commercial RRC Regional Related Office/Commercial VC Village Commercial LM rry St L~M Hiqhland Ave, L L nailroad Traekcr M (~. H M VC LM N PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC E Elementary. JRH Junior High School HS High School p Parks SBCFC San Bernardino County Flood Control UC Utility Corridor W~E 0 EXHIBIT B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 97-01 & VCPA 97-01 N Base Line Rd Area 1 [ Area 2 H M LJ L~ Area 3 -~ _ Fo~thm Bird: Church $~ RESIDENTIAL L Low Density. (2-4 DU/AC) Low Medium Density. (4~ DU/AC) M Medium Density. (8-14 DU/AC) Hi{b Densi~ (24-30 DU/AC) COMMERCIAL CC Communi~ Commercml CF Communi~.' FaciU~ NC Neighborhood Commercial OP O ITice Park RC Recreational Commercmi Regional Reinted Officr~Commerctal Village Commercial PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC E Elementary. JRH Junior High School HS High School p Parks SBCFC ~an Bernardino County. Flood Control UC Utlli~ Comdor EXHIBIT C GPA 96-03B & 97-01 and VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 MARCH 25, 1998 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EXHIBIT "D" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: March 25, 1998 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSI=SSMFNT AND G~=N!::RA! PI AN AM!=NDM~:NT 96-03B - SOUTHFRN CALIFORNIA I=DISON - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2.-4 dwelling units per acre), Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), on 35.65 acres of land located on the east side of future. Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; and the consideration by the City of alternative land use designation of Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between the Railroad Tracks and Base Line Road -APN: 227-091-41,227-393-01 and 02, and 227-351-65. !=NVIRONM!=NT,~.~ ASS!=SSMFNT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY P~AN AMFNr~MFNT 96-01 - SOl ITHFRN CAI IFC~RNIA !=nlSC~N - A request to amend the Community Plan to change the Development District from Utility Corridor (UC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), and Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), on 35.65 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road; the consideration by the City of attemafive land use designation of Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between the Railroad Tracks and Base Line Road; and the consideration to modify the ultimate width of the parkway at the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard from 7 to 25 feet - APN: 227-091-41,227-393-01 and 02, and 227-351-65. FNVIRONMI=NTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 - SOUTHFRN CALIFORNIA F:DISON - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from Utility Corridor (UC) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and I-15; and the consideration by the City of alternative land use designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between Base Line Road and Church Street - APN: 229-021-56 and 227-201-33. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-0t March 25, 1998 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - A request to amend the Development District from Utility Corridor (UC) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre), Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre), Medium- High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Regional Related Office/Commercial on 48.5 acres of land located on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and I-15; the consideration by the City of alternative land use designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the project site between Base Line Road and Church Street; and the consideration to modify the ultimate width of the parkway at the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard from 7 to 25 feet - APN: 229-021-56 and 227-201-33. RELATED TO THE ABOVE ITEMS IS THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ABSTRACT/BACKGROUND: Last Apnl, Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted applications to change the land use designation for their surplus utility corridor. The utility corridor is located along the east side of the future Day Creek Boulevard between Highland Avenue and 1-15. According to SCE, the surplus land was sold to private development companies. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the proposed land use changes. Staff prepared a separate report for the EIR, which will be reviewed by the Commission at the same headng. The Commission will consider both the EIR and the land use changes and will make recommendations to the City Council in that order. PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING SITE DESCRIPTION: Project Site and its Characteristics: The project site is linear in shape, approximately 330 feet wide by 10,756 feet long, contains multiple parcels, and is 84.15 acres in size. It is located approximately 1,200 feet east of Day Creek Channel and extends from the I-15 freeway north to Highland Avenue. The linear site is undeveloped and was previously set aside for utility corridor use. The project site is relatively fiat and vegetation consists of abandoned vineyards and native plants. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Utility Corridor and is zoned Utility Corridor/Open Space within the Victoria Community Plan. Surrounding Site and its Land Use: Surrounding the project site is mainly undeveloped land. North of the site will be the future Route 30 freeway where construction will begin soon. West of the site is the future Day Creek Boulevard and undeveloped land. It is zoned commercial and residential within the Victoria Community Plan. East of the site is undeveloped except for the section between Highland Avenue and the abandoned Southern Pacific Rail line which is developed with single family homes. The remainder portion is zoned for commercial and multi-family development. South of the site is undeveloped and zoned for industrial. Exhibits "B" and "C" show the existing land uses for the project site and the surrounding areas. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 March 25, 1998 Page 3 ANALYSIS: General: SCE.l~roposes to change the land use from Utility Corridor to the same land uses as those to the east of the project site. The following sections of the report focus on the appropriateness of the proposed land uses and the consideration of alternative land uses. General Plan Amendment 96-03B and Victoda Community Plan Amendment 96-01: These land use amendments apply to the section of the project site between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road. This section of the project site is divided into three areas, as shown in Exhibit "B" for discussion and evaluation of land uses. Areas 1 and 2 - Proposed Land Uses between Highland Avenue and Abandoned Rail Line: The applicant requested land use designations of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for Areas 1 and 2 respectively. East of the site is developed with single family residences and the existing land uses are Low and Low-Medium Residential. West of the site between Highland Avenue and Silverberry Street is designated Village Commercial, and between Silverberry Street and the abandoned rail line is designated Medium and Low-Medium Residential. The density ranges are 4-8 and 8-14 dwelling units per acre respectively. Future residential development based on the proposed land uses for the project site would not be impacted by the future commercial and multi-family development located at the west side because future Day Creek Boulevard creates a buffer separation between the uses. Further, the widened parleway (25 feet) at the east side of the street based on the mitigation cited in the EIR will provide additional buffer from the major arterial. The concern with single family development abutting the future freeway toward the north side is the impacts of noise and aesthetics. Because there will be a frontage road with parkway landscaping for this stretch of Highland Avenue and the Victoria Community Plan requires a Minor Community Entry design at the comers of Day Creek Boulevard and Highland Avenue, the future residential area will be adequately buffered from the future freeway. Exhibit "E" shows the Entry Hierarchy Plan within the planned community. Staff believes that the proposed land uses of Low and Low-Medium Residential would be appropriate because they provide density compatibility to the existing residences to the east and the mitigation cited in the EIR adequately addresses the buffedng of residential area. Area 3 - Proposed Land Use between Abandoned Rail Line and Base Line Road: The applicant requested land use designation of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for Area 3 as shown in Exhibit "B," East of the site is an existing mini- storage and RV storage facility and east of the facility is undeveloped land but planned for a future condominium complex. The existing land use designation is also Medium Residential with the density range of 8-14 dwelling units per acre. West of the site is undeveloped and the existing land use designations are Medium Residential and Community Facility, The Community Facility designation at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and the abandoned rail line is to allow for a future fire station, if needed. Staff believes that a Medium Residential land use designation would be appropriate as it will provide the same density as the existing land use. Consideration of Alternative Land Use for Area 3: An alternative land use proposed to be considered for Area 3 is Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 March 25, 1998 Page 4 City's Redevelopment Agency (RDA) owns the property at the northwest corner of Base L~ne Road and Day Creek Boulevard. which was set aside for future housing developme, pt and for a future fire station. According to RDA staff, the intention of the Agency Board is to sell the property for single family housing development. A request to change the land use from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) will occur at the time of disposal of the property to facilitate the residential development. Recently, the City received a single family development proposal from Lewis Homes/ADR Development for this section of the project site under General Plan Amendment 96-03B, that is between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road. Again, the concern of having single family development along two major arterials is the impacts of noise and visual aesthetics. Under the Victoda Community Plan, the intersection of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard is a Major Residential Entry as shown in Exhibit "E." The entry design would require widened landscaping and edge treatment at the four corners. Also the EIR contains mitigation to address the visual impact by increasing the width of the parkway at the east side of Day Creek Boulevard from 7 to 25 feet. The major entry design together with the widened parkway would adequately buffer the proposed single family residential development from the two major arterials. Therefore, the alternative Low- Medium land use designation could be appropriate for this section of the project site. Further, a residential land use designation, whether LOW, Low-Medium, or Medium Residential, would not preclude the opportunity to have non-residential uses such as the expansion of the existing mini-storage and RV vehicle storage facility, churches, private schools, child care cente~, park and open space, etct.' (See Exhibit "H") Staff Conclusion: Based on the above analysis, staff concluded the appropriate land use for Area 1 between Highland Avenue and Silverberry Street is Low Residential, Area- 2 between Silverberry Street and the abandoned ratt line is Low-Medium Residential, and Area 3 between the abandoned raW line and Base Line Road is Low-Medium Residential. Gener~,l Plain Amendment 97-01 ~nd Victori., Community Pl~,n Amendment 97-01: These land use amendments apply to the section of the project site between Base Line Road south to I;15 Freeway. This section of the project site is divided into four areas, as shown in Exhibit "C" for discussion and evaluation of land uses. ' Are~, 1 - Proposed Land Uses between Base Line Road and Church Street: The applicant requested a land use designation of High Residential (24-30 dwelling unit per acre) for Area 1. The proposed High Residential for Area 1 with a density range of 24-30 dwelling units per acre will not provide the proper density transition to a Medium Residential with a density of 8-14 dwelling units per acre within Area 2. Staff believes that the best land use designation for Area 1 is to have a Medium Residential designation, which will provide land use compatibility. Are¢,s ~ and 3 - ProPOSed Land Uses between Base ! ine Road and Church Street: The applicant requested land use designation Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for Area 2 and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) for Area 3. These proposed land uses correspond to the existing land uses east of the project site. Staff believes that the proposed Medium and Medium-High Residential for Areas 2 and 3 are appropriate because they will be compatible to the eastedy land uses. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 March 25, 1998 Page 5 Area 4 - Proposed Land Use between Church Street and 1-15 Freeway: The appficant requested a !and use designation of Regional Related OfficeiCommercial consistent with the I~f~'~d use west and south of the site. Staff believes that the proposed land use is appropriate because it will be compatible with the adjacent commercial use. Consideration of Alternative Land Uses for Areas 1 through 3: Alternative land uses of Low Residential and Low-Medium Residential were considered for Areas 1, 2, and 3. The two lower density alternatives may create land use conflicts between single family development and multi-family development such as town houses and condominiums. The existing land use south of the Church Street is predominantly commercial with the City's Regional Center immediately south of Church Street. The lower density land use in Area 3 would create a major land use conflict. Staff Conclusion: Based on the above analysis, staff concluded the appropriate land uses are Medium Residential for Areas 1 and 2, Medium High Residential for Area 3 and Regional Related Office/Commercial for Area 4. Related Information on the Adjacent Victoria Lakes (Arbors): Staff recently received land use amendment applications for major changes to the Victoria Lakes Village within the Victoria Community Plan. The proposed project area encompasses the Victoria Lakes project, areas west of Day Creek Boulevard, areas west of Etiwanda Avenue, and includes the section of utility corridor under General Plan Amendment 97-01 and Victoda Community Plan Amendment 97-01. The proposed changes involve reducing the residential density within the Victoria Lakes project and changing some of the commercially designated land at the west side of Day Creek Boulevard to multifamily residential land uses. An EIR is required and staff has selected a consultant to prepare the EIR. The purpose of this information is to give the Commission a "heads up" on the future land use consideration. Essentially, the Commission would have another opportunity to review comprehensively the land use pattern for this block of land area. Proposed Modification to the Ultimate Width of the Parkway for the Fast Side of Dav Creek Boulevard: The existing width of Day Creek Boulevard is 120 feet with a 19-foot parkway at the west side and a 7-foot parkway at the east side, as shown in Exhibit "F." The narrower parkway on the east side was in anticipation of a future utility corridor with high tower transmission lines. With the proposed land use changes for residential and commercial development, an impact identified by the EIR is the loss of aesthetic and view shed. The mitigations listed in the EIR are: increase the parkway width to 25 feet to preserve the v~ew shed and require the applicant who files the first development or tentative map to submit specific designs for the parkway, the sound wall along Day Creek Boulevard, the plant palette, and other related graphics within the Victoria Community Plan. To follow through with this mitigation, staff has modified pages 155 and 157 of the Victoria Community Plan to add design criteria that requires the developer, at the time of filing a tentative map or development, to pay for a consultant hired by the City to design the special parkway, the landscape edge treatment, the sound wall, the plant palette, etc., for Planning Commission review and approval prior to approval of a tentative map or development. Exhibits "F" and "G" show the proposed modification. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the land use amendments applications The environmental analysis is contained in the PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 96-03B & 97-01 AND VCPA 96-01 & 97-01 March 25. 1998 Page 6 separate EIR staff report. which will be cons~clered at the same hearing. The proposed alternative land uses discussed in this report have been evaluated in the EIR. The mitcgat~on with the monitoring program address the proposed and the alternative land uses. FACTS FOR FINDING: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following facts for findings: The project site is suitable for the uses allowed in the proposed Land Use and Development Distdct designations. The proposed amendments will have significant adverse impacts on the environment as described in the EIR, but the potential positive impacis of other environmental aspects will provide sufficient benefits, as listed in the Statement of Overriding CoBsiderations attached to the proposed City Council Resolution to certify the EIR. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Plan and the Victoda Community Plan because they promote the goals and objectives for single family residential development and commercial development. CORRFSPOND~:NCF: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three 4- by 8-foot public headng signs, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site and within aPl:~'oximately 1,00 f~t east of the project site between Highland Avenue and the abandoned rail line. RF:COMMI:NDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission recommend approval of General Plan Amendments 96-03B and 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96-01 and 97-01 to the City Council through the adoption of the attached resolutions. Brad Buller City Planner BB: Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Location Map GPA 96-03B & VCPA 96-01 Existing and Proposed Land Use GPA 97-01 & VCPA 97-01 Existing and Proposed Land Use Proposed & Alternative Land Uses Victoria Community Plan Entry Hierarchy Plan Day Creek Boulevard Street Section Victoda Community Plan Plant Palette Plan Uses Conditionally Permitted in Low-Medium and Medium Zones Planning Commission Resolutions Recommending Approval of GPA 96-03B and 97-01 and VCPA 96-01 and 97-01 Land Use Amendment for Edison Utility Corddor (GPA 96-03B & GPA 97-01) (VPCA-96:O1 &-VPCA 97-01) , HIGHLAND ,_~V_E:- ~ r-FbOTHILL uLVu;: tF'/MII- LEI~ ST. i - 0.57 Exhibit A 0 0.57 1. ~4 Miles N W E S ~4.:~ ~' LAND USE AMENDMENT FOR EDISON UTILITY CORRIDOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 96-03B & VCPA 96-01 Highland Ave PUDLIC & ~UASI-PUBLIC L L~' Dcm, ily (2-4 DUi^C') E El=mcnlnry School L.t4 Lnw M=dl.m l..k.~h! (4-8 DU/^C') JK,I! J.nior llqlh School M Medium Dcnshy (g-14 DUfA~J li$ IligH $ci~ool MI{ Mcd;um ]{iSh Dcnaily (14-24 DU/A p ]'ntlt~ }l HiGh Dcn:ily (24-30 DU/AC") UC l. Aility Corridor CYOM MERCI^L Exhibit B 1000 0 1000 2900 Feet L/LI~D USE_AMENDMENT FOt. EDISON UTILITY CORRIDOR CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 97-01 & VCPA 97-01 ~ ~ se Line Rd Area Area ~ I ~ . ~ · - ..."' ~f,~ ~ I :~-: .:;~"- ' '" .')~.:'.:".' ' :'. i[ESlDENTIAL Exhibit C 100~ 0 EDISON UTILITY CORRIDOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 96-03B & VCPA 96-01 Highland Ave EXISTING UC UC UC L L LM LM M LM RECOMMENDATION Exhibit D-1 EDISON UTILITY CORRIDOR CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 97-01 & VCPA 97-01 d. r,j Area 3 i C,., AI~I 4 M LM L M LM L M~ LM L RR RR UC H UC M UC MH UC RR Exhibit D-2 STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION B. B. INTER~'ECTION WITH ARTERIAL ROADS Exhibit E .1 -J w n_j Ordinance No. 287 Page 2 Thac the size and configuration of the proposed RV serrate Inc ~s adequate f~r the pissned Thac the location of ~be proposed facility is adj·cent Co a primary circul·cion route Co permit ressou·hie ·cress to the f·cility viebout resulting in nag·rive imp·ors for surrounding properties. Thac the proposed RV storage loc is compatible with existing surrounding uses, or with those further uses permitted in the land use designations. Thac the proposed ~V storage loc would not be detrimental to and result ia significant negative impacts for surrounding propert£es, properc~ owners, sad/or residents. Thac the total number of RV space~ pro~ided, whether as spaces on an individual loc basis or within a ~V storage lot, does risc exceed more than 252 of the total nu~er of ~ellin~ units in the L~, L~-Medium, and Medium land use cac~oziee. .~r~ ............. . -- , · ~ _ ~oueing ~ be pe~cc~ vben in conjunction ~ ~ eC~e let 4~elop~ is co~oce co cbe &aini-varebouse shall be defined as · structure, or stomp of structures, providing enclosed end locked compartments for the dead scorqe of customer goods and yates where individual lockers oE scalls are rented ouc co di£ferenc tenants for sco~a~e. ~a vicb cbe primary i~ scorqe loc, s mini-warehouse facility shall be designed co prisatilT cater Co cbe ne~s of the residence o[ -- cbe V£cCo~ia Flanned Community. ~V scorqe l~Cs when developed vicb ·creamery e~ni-varebouee shall con~orm to the following developseriC standards: The minimt~m ares of · lot for a mioi-v·rehouae facilit~y shall be 2 acres. The maxinure buildins height shall be 2 stories or 25 feet, except chac any building or portion of a building within 25 feet of the front or street side setbeck shall have · maxisis height of one--scot7 or 10 feet. Only one point of ingress and egress shell be allowed, unless &notbeE is required by the Fire Department. All driverrye shall be radius type, end shall have an unobstructed length of &Ofeec from the curb to prevent vehicles end trailers from interfering with traffic flow in the street. 'RDiNA~CE NO, 2B7 S'/:SAPONGA, ~17-,~lA, ~9PTiNG VICTORIA PL.~NN~ COM~JNI~' ~M~DMENT ~5-.71 , T~ M~I'IFY THE A RECREATION~ VEHICLE STO~E LOT WITN MINI-WAREHOUSE IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH (MR) OR HIGR (H) L~D USE CAT~ORY, ~D TO ~h~ ITS OPE~TION O~ A COMMBRCI~, FOR R~T B~IS, OP~ TO THE G~E~ PUBLIC. The City Council of the City of Ranoho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: following: The City Council hereby finds and determines the That the Planning Com~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing ~eld in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the Coma, miry Plan text amendment hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said r ecom~ndacion. That this Com-,,nity Plan text amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamooga. T~at this Co~nic~ Plan text amendsent is consistent with the original intent of the Victoria Planned Co-~,niLT. %'hie Co~niC7 Plan text amendment will ha~e no sisnificanc environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SKCTIO~ 2: The Com~a~niCy Plan text of the Victoria Planned Com.-,nimf is bereb7 amende~ to read Condition ~5 of "General" of Resolution No, 81-3 -- read as foll~: "Recreational Vehicle ~Cor~e shall be pr~ided within each residential lao4 use caC~o~ of L~, L~-Medium, - and Medium for 2~ of the lots or unica concaio~ ~ within ~bose lots within ~he Victoria Planned Com~nic~. RV ecora~e shall be pr~ided vichio the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Com~nity. ~e ~ perceoc of recreacioual vehicle scor~e spaces shall be r~ised on an annual basis and may be modified by Condition #6 of "General" of Resolution No. 81-37 to read as follows: "Recreational Vehicle :forage" shall not be permitted in the Medium-Righ or Righ land use category unless within a designate4 RV ecotage loc, and shall be restricted by CC & R's subject to the review and apprcrval of the City Attorney. Recreational vehicle storage lots may be permitted within the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community subject 5o the granting of a Conditional use Permit by the rlanning Commission. Prior co approving a CUP for a RV storage lot, the Planning Commission shall make the following findings: 3. Lo~-.Medi~.~ P. ensity ?.esi~ie~tial ~'"-M" Land Use Plan designaticn3: Land designateJ as Low- ~ di~-~ 2ensity Residential is intendeC residential gevelc.mnent that has a range of four to eight ~eiiings adjusted gro~s'.acre. Tb.e following regulations are applicable to these are&$: ae Uses Permitted: detached or attached residential 6wellings not exceeding eight d~e!lings per adjusted gross acre. including. but not limited to: (1) Single family attache~ dwe!ling~. Single family attached dwellings, including, but not limited to, duplexes and triplexes. (3) C!us=er Housing. Do (4) "Zero lot 1~.-" h~mes .......... ~_ ) Community Facilities as specified on page 241.~ ) Accessory Uses Permitted: any of the following uses, and structure~. (!) garages an~ aarp~rts. in compliance with the ~ite development s~an~ar4s provide4 herein. (2) Fences. walls. and trellises. Sw~-~ing pools with a minimum 5 foot high fence enclosing pool. Accessory uses and structures necessary or customarily inci~ential to a principal u~e as Permitted ~,f r, be Rancho Cu~amonga Zoning Ordinance. c. Site Development Standards: Single Family C~nter Plot dwellings. (a) Building site ares: 5.000 sq. ft. minimum. 5,500 sq. ft. average. Building site width'. 50 feet minimum. It is in~ended that site widths will vary according to lot size. to lot si:e, see Building site coverage: varies according typical lot plans, pp. 214 - 223. (d) Building setbacks: varies according to typical lot plans a~d table. (e) Building height: 35 ~eet ~axim~:z. size, see ."'he Comm,~n~t7 Facilities section of the Victoria Comm,~it is established to provide for co=.=uni.--3 support uses and those / additional uses which are found :c be compatible with the basic permitted uses by ~he Site Plan Revie~ Process procedure. i. Uses ?e:=itted - .'?~e following uses sha~i be ?ermit:ed ~ithin Residential and Commercial Land U~e a teas in ~ic=oria: ae Small Family Day Care in ~he home. providing care for six (6) or less persons. Public Park and Playground. General Open Space uses. Accessory s~ructures and uses necessary or customari!y incidental =o :he a~ove as provided for in the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. e Condi=iomally permitted Uses - Tee foll~ing uses shall be permitted within Residential or C~,amercial Land Use area~ in Victoria subject ~o the Conditional Use Permi: process: a. Church. Club. lodge. fra:erai=y amd sorority. C~valeace=~ ce=:er. Public ~acili:T. Large Family Da7 Dare in ~e ~ome. providing care for 7-12 persons. Child Care ceu:era. Fire and police s:a:iom. 7 h. Ou~ do~r recrear/~. ~ i. Scho~la. private an~ parochial. j. U~ilir7 or service facility. This section contains specific criteria for the roads within ,Vic'.oria. The Standard Roa~ See'.ion Reference Plan shows ~f:he entire ~lanning area an~ '.~e location of =he various ' kin~s o~ ro~s. The S~an~a:~ Roa~ C:oss-Sec~ions follow =hey con=sin information such as =he wia=h of =he 'way, pavement wig=h, n=be: of =:avel lanes, an~ !oca=ion of walks, bicic!e lanes an~ medians. Each road has been examined individually and =he ~esign of =he cross- . ~ ' sec=ion reflec=s not only the need for efflci- ' circu!a:ion, but also the goals of =he plan with respect land use ~d urban design. All road sec=ions are scnematlc and.do not show any grade conditions ~ha= may exist ,where :he roads are bui!~. Y EXHIBIT E EXHIBIT F RESOLUTION NO. (? ~-~'~i: ? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 96-03B, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM UTILITY CORRIDi~,R TO LOW RESIDENTIAL, AND LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR 35.65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 227-091-41,227-393-01 AND 02, AND 227-351-65 A. Recitals. 1. Southern California Edison has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 96-03B as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 25, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 96-03B. 3. On Apd115, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-referenced public hearing on April 15, 1998, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 35.65 acres of land, approximately 330 feet wide and 4,706 feet long, located between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Utility Corridor. b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated future freeway and will be under construction soon. The property to the west is designated Village Commercial, Medium Residential, and Low-Medium Residential and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low Residential, Low-Medium Residential, and Medium Residential, and is developed with single family homes and a mini-storage and RV vehicle storage facility. The property to the south is designated Community Facility, High Residential, Utility Corddor (to be changed under General Plan Amendment 97-01) and is partially undeveloped and partially developed with a winery. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 96-03B - SCE April 15, 1998 Page 2 This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. e. Thi~.emendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. An Environmental Impact Report has been certified for the amendment and a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been adopted in connection with this application. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment with the mitigation identified in the EIR would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistencies with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 96-03B, amending the land use element of the General Plan including the map from Utility Corridor to Low Residential and Low-Medium Residential a8 ~hown in Exhibit "A." 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 96-03B & VCPA 96-01 ~ ~ Are I RESIDENTIAL PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC L Low Densi~' (2-,4 DU/AC) E E ementam' LM Low M~ium Densi? (~8 DU/A~ J~ Junior High School M Medium Density (~14 DU/A~ HS High School MH High Densi~' (2&30 DU/AC) P Par~ SBCFC San Bernardino CounD' Flood Control COMMERCIAL UC UtiliD' Corridor N CC Cornmum? Commercial CF Communz~ FaciliD' NC Neighborhood Commercial OP Office Park RC Recreational Commercial RRC R~ional Related OfficeCommercial VC Village Commercial Exhibit A ORDINANCE NO 5¢ '1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AM~ENDMENT 96-01. CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FROM UTILITY CORRIDOR/OPEN SPACE TO LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 35.65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND MODIFYING THE ULTIMATE WIDTH OF THE PARKWAY AT THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM 7 TO 25 FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 227-091-41, 227-393-01 AND 02, AND 227-351-65. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 96-01, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 25, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended to the City Council approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 96-01. 3. On Apdi 15, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on April 15, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 35.65 acres of land, approximately 330 feet wide and 4,706 feet long, located between Highland Avenue and Base Line Road and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Utility Corridor. b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated future freeway and will be under construction soon. The property to the west is designated Village Commercial, Medium Residential, and Low-Medium Residential and is undeveloped. The property to the east is designated Low Residential, Low-Medium Residential, and Medium Residential, and is developed with single family homes and a mini-storage and RV vehicle storage facility. The property to the south is designated Community Facility, High Residential, Utility Corridor (to be changed under General Plan Amendment 97-01) and is partially undeveloped and partialiy developed with a winery. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VCPA 96-01 - SCE April 15, 1998 Page 2 c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties An Environmental Impact Report has been certified for the amendment and a Statement of Overrid~g Considerations has been adopted in connection with this application. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and Code; and That this amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and Code; and That the subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development e. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph~ 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Victoda Community Plan Amendment No. 96-01, amending the land use map from Utility Corridor to Low Residential and Low-Medium Residential as shown in Exhibit "A," and amending the ultimate width of the parkway on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard from 7 to 25 feet, as shown in Exhibits "B" and "C." 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 96-03B & VCPA 96-01 $.B.C.F.C. I ._. li Area 2 LM LM A~ea 3 I, ---B~.e u ~e Ho' 'ry St RESIDENTIAL Low De~ity (~..4 DUIAC) LM Low Mmii~m Density (4-$ DU/AC) M Medium Density (8-14 DU/AC') High Density (24-~0 DU/AC) COMMERCIAL CC Community. Commercial CF Community Facility NC Neighborhood Commercial Office Park RC Recreational Commercial Regional Re~ated Office/Commercial Villi~e Commercial L abandoned. u i> ¥C Highland Ave ~ H M N W~E 0 PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC L E Element~rT JRH Junior High S~hool HS High School p ParKs SBCFC San Bernardino County Flood Control UC Utili~ Corridor Exhibit A 1000 2000 Feet C) W W 0 !i,I RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 97-01, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM UTILITY CORRIDOR TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL, AND REGtONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL FOR 48.5 ACRES OF LAND LO~.ATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN BASE LINE ROAD AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-021-56 AND 227-201-33. A. Recitals. 1. Southern California Edison has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 97-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 25, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment 97-01. 3. On April 15, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the above-referenced public headng on Apdl 15, 1998, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 48.5 acres of land, approximately 330 feet wide and 6,050 feet long, located between Base Line Road and the 1-15 Freeway, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Utility Corridor. b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Utility Corridor (to be changed to Low-Medium Residential) and Medium Residential and is partially undeveloped and partially developed with a mini-storage and RV vehicle storage facility. The property to the east is designated Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, and Regional Related Office/Commercial and is undeveloped. The properties to the south and west are designated Regional Related Office/commercial and are undeveloped. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 97-01 - SCE April 15, 1998 Page 2 properties Statement e This amendment would not be mater~ally injurious or detrimental to the adjacent An Environmental Impact Report has been certified for the amendment and a of Overricr~pg Considerations has been adopted in connection with this application. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment with the mitigation identified in the EIR would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistencies with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 97-01, amending the land use element of the General Plan including the map from Utility Corridor to Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, and Regional Related Office/Commercial, as shown in Exhibit "A." 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. CITY OF I~4,NCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 97-01 & VCPA 97-1)1 N Base Line Rdl ~ i -..-.:.:-..... . ~,~:.;~-. .....:..:..:...'~."~ ' ' ~ ' · ' ' :. ..": 't" '.- ;- ' ~.:..~... ::~/ _ M M~ium ~nsity (~14 DU/AC) MH Hisb Dea=ily (2~30 DU/AC) 29OO F~ 1000 COMMERCIAL CC Community Commercial CF Community Facility NC Neighborhood Commercial OP O fTice Park RC Recreational Commercial RilC Regional Related Office/Commercial VC Village Commercial PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC E ElementarT JPJ-I Junior High School HS High School P Parks SBCFC San Bernardino County Flood Control UC Utility Corridor Exhibit A ORDINANCE NO. .~"~ ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN Arv~NDMENT 97-01, CHANGING THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FROM UTIl. ITY CORRIDOR TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL, AND REGIONAL RELATED OFFICE/COMMERCIAL FOR 48.5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN BASE LINE ROAD AND 1-15 FREEWAY, AND MODIFYING THE ULTIMATE WIDTH OF THE PARKWAY AT THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD FROM 7 TO 25 FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-021-56 AND 227-201-33. A. Recitals. 1. Southern California Edison has filed an application for Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 97-01 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 25, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended to the City Council approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 97-01. 3. On Apd115, 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on Apdl 15, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 48.5 acres of land, approximately 330 feet wide and 8,050 feet long, located between Base Line Road and I-15 Freeway, and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Utility Corridor. b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Utility Corridor (to be changed to Low-Medium Residential) and Medium Residential and is partially undeveloped and partially developed with a mini-storage and RV vehicle storage facility. The property to the east is designated Medium Residential, Medium-High Residential, and Regional Related Office/Commercial is undeveloped. The properties to the south and west are designated Regional Related Office/commercial and are undeveloped. c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. An Environmental Impact Report has been certified for the amendment and a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been adopted in connection with this application. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. VCPA 97-01 - SCE April 15, 1998 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public he~'ing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a, That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment with the mitigation identified in the EIR would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistencies with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions se{ forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 97-01, amending the land use map from Utility Corddot to Medium Residential Medium-High Residential and Regional Related Office/Commercial, and as shown in Exhibit "A," and amending the ultimate width of the parkway at the east side of Day Creek Boulevard from 7 to 25 feet, as shown in Exhibits "B" and "C." 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. CITY OF R_~.NCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 9%01 & VCPA 97-01 Base Line Rdl "-" I Area'l' ~I~i!:CF H I MI ._:. L--li~'~'~:~i::! .. '~ ~ ' · '-- :-".. ..'i ':- :_ ,i.;:.:.5~ "." .: ' ." o!o ._.3 ~. '~' ) ~' 0 ~ Area 4 ~'*~'~.~:~i! - - ' . , .:-. - ..': :'?'..:::.":. - ~ ," . . .,..:..:: ...;:.:',~.:::5~/:...-_ 0 ' :" ":'""' ' ' '":'":' ~ ' ': ~" . ' .~., MH H~b ~i~ ~ DU/AC) . ~ ..::/ .' ....,.: :...:..' . . * ~ ~,**:~ CC Community Commercial . ~' '. '....:: ,~ cr co....,; '~ NC Nei~h~rh~ Commercinl . ":.- . _"~/ OP O~ce Park .'.' ' - . '.~/ RC Rec~tional Commercial .... '~.~ ~.7 RRC Regional Related OmcwCommerctal -- -- -- --..- ~/ ~c ~,,.,. co....,., . ...:..'~ PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC N : .: "/ e ~. ~~ P P~r~ S Exhibit A T OOOOO0O00000000~l o 0 0 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 15. 1908 May~'r and Members of the City Council Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Director ,,'~ / aulP~a Pachon, agement Analyst II of~Uequest from Muscular Dy~trop!W A.~sociation to Waive City Fees for the "l~ancho Cnc~monga Most Wanted Fundrt0.~er" to be Held on May 20. 1998 at the Rancho Cucamo~ga F~icenter RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the request for a waiver of facility rental fees for the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) Fundraiser to be held on May 20, 1998 at the Epicenter and provide staff with direction on processing with this request. This is a fundraising event for the Association which works locally to combat neuromuscular disease. !iACKGROUNI~/ANAI.Y~IN: The City has received a request from the Riverside office of the Muscular Dystrophy Association to waive facility rental fees for their 1998 "Rancho Cucamonga Most Wanted" fundraiser which they have scheduled for May 20, 1998. The event would take place in the Skyboxes at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium. Business and community leaders would be "arrested" at the place of business and transported to the Epicenter. Once at the Epicenter their bail would be set, and they will be given cellular phones to make calls to raise their bail. This event was held last year in our community at Socorro's Mexician Restaurant and raised $14,000 for MDA to further their efforts in research, local programs and professional and public health education. FISCAl. IMPACT: Rental fees for this activity are estimated to be $3,600 for nine (9) skyboxes for the eight hour period. It is recommend that should Council wish to approve the waiver of facility rental fees that they direct staff to set a refundable damage/security deposit in the amount of $1,000. This refundable fee would be used for any damages incurred to the site or any unanticipated maintenance expenses. P~spectfu~ submitted, (J~rry Fulwood Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Director JF/PP/pp 650 Iowa Avenue. ~ 160, Riverside, CA 92507 Tele~r,o~e i9091 369-0720; Fax: (909)369-89~ 1 March9,199g The Honorable William Alexander Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Dear Mayor Alexander: On Thursday, May 20, 1998, the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes will be hosting a fund-raiser to benefit the Muscular Dystrophy Association from 9:00am to 4:00pro. We would like to hold the event a~ the Epicenter on the Skybox level. Obviously, the Quakes are supporting this event and we have received clearance from the Facility Manager on site. We respectfully request flaat the $50/bour tinage fee be waived due to the fact that we are a non-profit naticmal voluntary health "Rancho Cucamonga's Most Wanted" is an event which took place at Socorro's Mexican Restaurant last year and raised over $14,000. Business and Community leaders are "arrested" for having big hearts. Warrants are issued for their arrest and they are picked up at a given time at their place of business and t~aasported to the "Maximum Appreciation Facility" which would be the Epicenter. Once inside, their bail is set and they are given a cellular phone to make calls to raise their bail. We provide lunch which is donated from restaurants in the community. The event is a wonderful opportunity for us to heighten awareness about neuromuscula~ disease while, at the same time, creating an avenue for the Quakes to publicize their team and the many advertising opportunities available to local businesses. This' is an event which is held in different communities all across the country. Some businesses which have hosted the event locally include Harley Davidson of Victorville, Pomona Valley Harley Davidson, Crabby Bob's Seafood, TGI Fridays, Chili's Grill & Bar, Antelope Valley Jethawks, Outback Steakhouse and man,v, many more. MDA's fundraising goal is to raise one more dollar than last year. The City ef Rancho Cucamonga, its residents and businesses have always been supportive of MDA. MDA works in your community to combat neuromuscular disease through basic and applied scientific investigation, local comprehensive programs of medical services and clinical care, and Musculor Dy~toph¥ A.sr~lc~ion JERRY ~EW;$, '-:atioral Dodicc?ed to .~ ercd~COflor', of the mus;ulc~ ct, S'ffo~h~es..~nWo'rrOph, tc Icteral sclerO~s (Lou Gel"',rlg r'.'~yosth, er~O grovis, 'rr',e ~ptr',.ai musculOr O"frooh~e5 ~-rieg~e;ch"s ,~Oxic One2 c most O~ ol"ner nouror~usculor MDA;Page Two wides3~read professional and pubiic health cducztion. ,~n individual who has been d/agnosed with any of the 40 nem-omuscular diseases which MDA covers is entitled to receive an)' of ~e many services prov/ded free of charge. The local chmc which services indavidua[s from your community is Loma Linda Medical Center in Loma Linda. Also, children ages 6-21 who are battling ncuromuscular disease can attend MI)A Summer Camp each summer in Jcmc. This program is unique because many of our children taxely have the opportunity to leave their homes and sociali?g with other chilctrcn who arc facing similar difficulties. Again, there is no cost for these programs to those we serve. On behalf of the more than 900 local families we serve, thank you in advance for your support. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please fccl fxce to call me at (909) 369-0720. Sincerely, t~tie R. V,'illison District Director Sm l~mantino County 0~3-11-98 11:4-5 RECEIVED FROH: P.O3 d~/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~MONGA STAFF REPORT [)ATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April t.5. I!),().~ Mayo[, and Members or' tile Citv C()tmcil Jack Lain, A1CP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair. G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) RECOMM~.N~&TION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual benefit assessment levy of ninety-two dollars and seventeen cents ($92.17) per parcel for the maintenance and/or servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin). " On November 6, 1991, City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-331 for the annual levy of benefit assessments for the maintenance and/or servicing of a 27+ acre-foot alesilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2, Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Drainage Area No. 91-2 was a developer initiated district. Protection of the properties from the overland flows was necessary in order to receive development rights from the City. The costs associated with the maintenance of the district was intended to be passed onto the property owners as they would receive special and direct benefit that is distinguishable from the general public. Construction o[ homes are now in progress and are being placed on the market for sale. There are 350 homes that will be constructed. The total annual cost for maintenance is thirty-two thousand, two hundred and sixty dollars (832,260) for a total cost to each home of ninety-two dollars and seventeen cents (892.17) Respectfully submitted. Lawrence Administrative Services Director LIT:IYB:de Attachments: Resolution Annual Supplement to Final Engineer's Report Map RESOLUTION NO. ~ ,~ - ~ ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF Tt tE ('ITY ~ '¢ )I 'N( 'If. ~)I: Tt tE ( 'Iq~/()F 5L,\NCt tO CUC,,kMONG,X, ('..XLiI:f)RXI.N. I2E'i'KRMINiN(; TIlE ('~gST SERVICE TO BE [:INAN('EI) I~h' tJI-]XKI'TI' ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED iN D[~NAGE ~EA NO. ~ 1-2 FOR FISC~ YE~ 1998- 1999 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertook proceedings to authorize the levy and imposition of benefit assessments to pay for the annual drainage maintenance, including the removal of sediment and debris from the Day Canyon Channel improvements and basin, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Oivision 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 54703), said area of benefit being known and designated as DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (the "Drainage Area"); and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented to this City Council a Supplemental Report (the 'Supplemental Report') to the Final Engineefts Report Drainage Area No. 91-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga setting forth a description of the proposed service, cost estimate and assessment schedule for fiscal year 1998-1999 (the 'Final Engineefts Report'); and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council desires to determine the cost of providing authorized services to be financed by the levy of a benefit assessment for fiscal year 1998-1999 and to determine and impose such benefit assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Supplemental Report is hereby approved and ordered to be kept on ffie in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Said Supplemental Report generally consists of the following: A. A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived through the levy and collection of the benefit assessment; B. A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment; C. The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel. SECTION 3: That the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment as set forth in the Final Engineefts Report is hereby adopted and has been utilized as the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment to be levied in fiscal year 1998-1999. SECTION 4: That this City Council hereby determines and orders that the benefit assessments described in the Supplemental Report within the Drainage Area are herebv confirmed and levied for fiscal year 1998- 1999. SECTION 5: That the above confirmed and levied benefit assessment for fiscal year 1996-1997 shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as general County property taxes are collected and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of such County taxes shall be applicable to the collection and enforcement of these benefit assessments. Resolution No. Page 2 NOE~ ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California. at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of April, 1998. Executed this 15th day of April, 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC. City Clerk ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA William J. Alexander, Mayor Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Debra Adams, City Clerk Joe O'Neil, City Engineer APRIL 1998 Resolution No. Page 4 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Map Report Exhibit A - Description of Serxqce Exhibit B - Cost Estimate Exhibit C - Assessment Schedule Resolution No. Paae 5 AGENCY: CITY OF RANCttO CUCAMONGA PROJECT: DRAINAGE AREA NO. t~l 2 TO: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO "BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982" This Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report (the "Annual Supplement") for City of Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Area No. 91-2 is hereby submitted consisting of the following documents, pursuant to the provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703. This Annual Supplement is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1998 to June 30, 1999. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE (Exhibit "A"): A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment. COST ESTIMATE (Exhibit "B"): A listing of all costs and expenses for the next fiscal year, including incidental expenses. o BENEFIT ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (Exhibit "C"): The annual assessment schedule, setting forth the following: Annual Benefit Assessment: The amount of the proposed benefit assessment for each parcel. Description of Parcel: A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment, said parcel being described by the County Assessor's parcel number. No benefit assessments shall be imposed or levied upon land owned by a Federal or State governmental agency and/or any other local agency. Any utility property and right-of-way shall be subject to assessment only to the extent that it is specifically benefitted from the proposed services. Reference is made the Final Engineer's Report as incorporated in Resolution No. 91-331 for a description of the boundaries of the Drainage Area and each parcel therein and for the method of spreading the benefit assessment. Resolution No. Page 6 Executed this 15th dav of April. 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga. California. C I-1~' ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA By: Final approval, confirmation, and levy of the annual benefit assessment and all matters in the Annual Supplement was made on the 15th day of April, 1998, by adoption of Resolution No. by the City Council. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of said Assessment Roll and Engineer's "Report" was filed in the Office of the City Engineer and the City Clerk on the 15th day of April, 1998. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY ENGINEER C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. Pa,ae 7 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION ()F SERVICE The properties within Drainage Area No. 91-2 are located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Protection of the properties within the district from overland flows requires the construction of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel. The channel improvements will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties and carry the storm water runoff, sediment, trash, organic material, and related debris to a desilting basin. Each year the sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris which accumulates in the desilting basin and channel must be removed and transported to an approved spoils site. The services proposed to be financed from the revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment are as follows: A. Monthly on-site inspections of the desilting basin and channel. Bi-monthly weed abatement program for the desilting basin and channel. Removal of accumulated sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris from the alesilting basin and channel to an approved spoils site. This service is expected to be provided annually. During times of excessive rain fall, this service may be required more frequently. Resolution No. Page 8 EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999 Cost of Annual Maintenance Desilting Basin Channel Subtotal $22,500 $ 6,640 $29,140 Incidental Expenses City Administration Subtotal $ 3.1~-0 $ 3.1~.0 C. Total Annual Costs $32,260 D. Contribution E. Balance to Assessment $32,260 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT SCHEDt;LE Resolution No. Page 9 WHEREAS, thi;'City Council has previously, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703, formed Drainage Area No. 91-2 all in accordance with the provisions of said Act; and, WHEREAS, the Annual Supplement for Fiscal Year 1998-1999 consisting of certain documentation (including the amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel, a description of the parcel and a description of the service proposed to be provided) has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Engineer, by virtue of tke power vested pursuant to said Act and by order of the legislative body, hereby makes and recommends the following benefit assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the service proposed to be financed through the levy of assessments and revenue derived for the fiscal year 1998-1999. Said costs and expenses are generally as follows: Cost of Maintenance Cost of Improvements Incidental Expenses Total Costs Contribution/Surplus Balance to Assessment $29,140 $ o $ 3.1~0 $32,260 $ o $32,260 I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within the area of benefit in proportion to the estimated benefits received, and hereby further state as follows: The amount of benefit assessment imposed is specifically related to the benefit of the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service to be provided. The annual aggregate amount of the total benefit assessment does not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service. The revenue derived from the benefit assessment shall not be used to pay for the cost of any service other than the service for which the benefit assessment was levied. The assessment parcels herein refer to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels, and said Roll shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. Resolution No. Page 10 The net amount to be assessed upon the lands has been spread and apportioned bv formula as set forth in lhe Final En.aineer's Report accordance witit. the benefits received from each parcel, and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance works of improvement. In the opinion of the undersigned, the benefit assessments have been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits to be received from the proposed work and services. Dated' CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT 225-471-01 to 58 225-481-01 to 42 225-491-01 to 19 225-451-01 to 35 225-451-39 to 58 225-461-01 to 60 225-072-68 Total PROPERTY DF..~CI~IPTION 35O Residential Parcels AMOUNT OF A.~.~R,~RM RNT $32,260.00 $32,260.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May~, and Members ol ~hc ('ilv C~)ux~( il Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) RECO~NDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual special tax levy of $14,670 an acre per parcel to discharge bond obligations in Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothfil Marketplace). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 1, 1993, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000. On December 15, 1993, the City Councfi adopted Ordinance No. 518 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on March 15, 1994, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public improvements that are required for and will permit the development of the properties within the district. While the property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $20,000 per acre, the tax rate that is needed to meet obligations for fiscal year 1998/99 is adjusted downward to $14,670 per acre. This special tax shall be levied as long as necessary for each parcel of taxable property to pay for the facilities and to discharge bond obligations and other debt of the district. Respectfully submitted, Lawren '~ ~ Administrative Services Director LIT:IYB:de Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY f:ACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 { FO OTH [LL MARKETPI.AC E) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, {hereinalter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPI~ CE) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of Califorma, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RE,SOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SF~-'TION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct SECTION ~: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1998-99 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. S!~.CTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; Bo Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds: Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds ~)f the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary. ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall bc paid illtO the Community Facilities District Ihnds. includina any bond fund and reserve tnnd. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the Couniv ~s hereby directed to enter in the next c~untv assessment roll on ~'hich taxes will become due', opposite'each lot or parcel of land effected in ~ space marked "public improvements, special tax". or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax. and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of Aprfi, 1998, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved. and adopted by the City Councfi of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of April, 1998. Executed this 15th day of April, 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 ~77 Resolution No. Pa~e 5 BACKGROUND- On December 15, 1993, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of the street, storm drain, sewer and water improvements. The district is bounded on the north by Foothill Blvd., on the east by Etiwanda Ave. and on the west by Interstate 15. The maximum rate has been set at $20,000 per acre. This amount can be levied at a lower rate but cannot exceed the maximum tax rate as set. The first annual tax rate of $14,670 for fiscal year 1998/99 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of $398,000. Resolution No. Page 6 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ~ROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $391,480 35,240 ~' 3,000 $ o $429,720 DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE SPECIAL TAX $14,6701~ACRE $ 0 $ 5,8O0 8439.. 500 $438,300 DATE: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 1 5, 1,~)9~ May*l; and Members ol the (3ilv Cot~ncil Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN THE ALTA LOMA CHANNEL DISTRICT NO. 84-2, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 86-2, MILLIK~, N SOUTH OF ARROW DISTRICT NO. 89-1 AND MASI PLAZA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE 1~ ~4~O~-N~&TION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual levy of five dollars ($5.00) per parcel for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within the Alta Loma Channel District No. 84-2, the Rancho Cucamonga Storm Drain District No. 86- 2, Milliken South of Arrow District No. 89-1 and Masi Plaza Assessment District No. 93- i. Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. The fee is calculated on a fiat fee basis of the current rate of five dollars {$5.00) per parcel {e.g., a percentage fee basis would inflate the base price per parcel). The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of assessment districts that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. Rancho Cucamonga's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management. payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public are funded from this fee. This fee is in place now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of service. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I Administrative Services Director LIT: IYB: de Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TIlE ('ir15' COUNCIL OF TI IE CITY OF R~NC[-IO CUCAMONGA, ('.\I.IF©RNI.\. RE AIiTIfr)RIZING TIlE LEXT OF AN ASNESSMFiNT NI'R{'IrAR(~E t'{)R TIlE EXPENSES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Assessment Districts"); and WHEREAS. said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, the City does incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments of the assessment within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 9.: Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the installments and of the interest thereon, not to exceed the Treasureifs estimate of the expenses of collection, and in any case not to exceed $5.00 per lot or parcel. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. SF. CTION 3: The above assessment surcharge, when collected, shall belong to the Citv and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. Resolution No. Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED. and ADOPTED this 15th day of April. 1998. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AB STAIN ED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of April, 1998. Executed this 15th day of Aprfi, 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga, C~!tfornia. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 15. 1!~9~ May~r~ and Members of the City ('OUltcil Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE I~'-COM~m.N~&TION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing an annual special tax levy of 8297.48 an acre per parcel to discharge bond obligations in Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In 1984 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities Dtstrtct No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of 820,225,000. Bonds were issued in August of 1985 in the amount of $18,000,000 to finance the construction of the Day Creek Channel. In 1986, the area between Mfiliken, Rochester and Highland and the northerly city limits was annexed into the district. On April 1, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92-079 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in May, 1992 in the amount of $16,530,000. The maximum rate for the special tax was set at $550 per acre when the district was formed. Since the formation, the rate has been $350.00 per acre with additional funding being contributed by the Redevelopment Agency contributes the difference to meet debt service obligations. However, with the authorized bond refunding the adjusted rate has been $297.48 or a savings of $52.52 per acre to the property owners. Respectfully submitted. Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director LIT: IYB:de Attachments: Resolution Exhibit 'A~ Annual Status Report Map RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF 'FILE CiTY OF P~'~NCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. RE-ESTABLIStfING ANNUAL SPECIAl. T,.\X I:OR C()MT~IlYNI'["f ["A('ILITIES DISTRICT 84-1 WHEREAS.~I~e City Council or' the City ot Rancho; Cucamonga, Calilbrnia. {hereinalter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"). has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and mount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1996-97 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4; That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Ao Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; Bo Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds: Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set 10rth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary, ad valorem property taxes are collected. and shall bc subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Communitv Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and rcsm~,x, lurid. SECTION 7: The ;\uditor of ttw C<~l~ntv is lit.l-cl;v dir,'~'/ecl 1o enter in the next ('{)umv assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report shoving the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection.8 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1998. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Councfi held on the 15th day of April, 1998, Executed this 15th day of April, 1998. at Rancho Cucamonga, Czltfornla. Debra J. Adams. CMC. City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84- 1 (DAY CREEK I)RAiXAGE ~YSTEM) 1. ZONE "A": General areas to be served by the drainage facilities, exclusive of Zone 2. ZONE "B": A limited area. being only partially served by drainage facilities. Zone "B": consists of those properties bounded on the south by FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, on the East by ROCHESTER AVENUE, on the North by BASELINE ROAD, and on the West by MILLIKEN AVENUE. The rate, method and formula for the levy of the special tax for the respective zones, being Zone "A" and Zone "B", is as follows, based upon an estimated bond amount of $18,000,000 payable over a period of twenty (20) years. ZONE "A": $297.48 PER ACRE. ZONE "B": $297.48 PER ACRE FOR 190 ACRES. For the purpose of defining the maximum special Tax, "ACRE" shall mean acres contained in the area of the parcel as determined using the acres as shown on the latest San Bernardino County Assessor's maps. ci~'¥ o~' RAI~CI-IO Ct~CAMO1~A MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM ANNUAL STATUS REPORT APRIL 1998 Resolution BACKGROUND On June 26, 1984, the electors within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $20,225,000. In August 1985 bonds in the amount of $18,000,000 were issued to finance the construction and installation of public capital drainage facilities to serve and provide drainage protection to all properties located within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). In March of 1986 the area bounded on the west by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the northerly City limits, on the east by Rochester Avenue and on the south by Highland Avenue was annexed into the district. The first annual special tax rate of $350 per acre was set by City Council in Fiscal Year 1985/86. This rate has never been increased in the ensuing fiscal years. However, on May 5, 1992, the City conducted a refunding of this district. Bonds were issued for $16,530,000.00 to cover the remaining debt. The savings from this refunding were passed on to the residents and decreased the special annual tax from $350 per acre to $297.48 per acre. Under the Loan and Pledge Agreement the Redevelopment Agency contributes sufficient funds each fiscal year, that when combined with the special tax meet the requirements of the annual debt service payment. All phases of construction for the Day Creek Drainage System are completed· The construction contract was administered by the County of San Bernardino. FISCAL ~ 1998199 The current rate of $297.48 per acre for fiscal year 1998/99 along with the Redev'elopment Agency contribution of 5975,000 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of S1.745,550. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $1,745,550 $ 122,250 $ 3,000 $ 19,420 $1,890,220 SOIIRC~'-~: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE SPECIAL TAX REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $ 6,000 $ 37,550 $ 871,670 $ 975.000 $ 1,890.220 $297.48 PER ACRE ^vv ~ ~v ~mmT~H CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: April 15, 1998 Mayer and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITH NO INCREASE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). There is no increase from the current tax rate for developed properties for Fiscal Year 98/99 rates. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate of pay debt service on the bonds. Special Tax A - Drainage Facilities Residential Class I (3590+ S.F.) Residential Class II (3077-3589 S.F.) Residential Class III (2564-3076 S.F.) Residential Class IV (2308-2563 S.F.) Residential Class V (2051-2307 S.F.) Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) Undeveloped Property $944 $699 $524 $420 $349 $245 $1,526/acre Special Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Residential Class Tax B - Law Enforcement I (3590 + S.F) II (3077-3587 S.F.) III (2564-3076 S.F.) IV (2308-2563 S.F.) V (2051-2307 S.F.) VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.oo $1.00 $1.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT C.F.D. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) April 15, 1998 Page 2 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 21, 1989, the City Council approved the formation of Community Facilities District No. 88-2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law Enforcement services and authorized the annual levy of special taxes to finance drainage facilities, police operations and maintenance costs. The special tax being levied annually for the drainage facilities are in Special Tax A Drainage Facilities. On April 7, 1994, City Council approved Resolution No. 94-058, authorizing the issuance of bonds. The collections from the annual levy will be used to pay debt service through the life of the bonds. The levy of special taxes annually for the Law Enforcement services are listed in Special Tax B - Law Enforcement. When the collections are received by the City, the funds are transferred to the General Fund to offset the Law Enforcement costs. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director LIT:IYB:de Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF 'HtE ClrI~' COUNCIL Of:' 'FttE CITY OF NANClIO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNI:\. RE ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECL'\I. TAX FOR C'OMMI'NI'D' t"A( 'II.iTIES I)ISTRICT NO. IDNAIXA(;E AND I.AW [.]XI:~ ~R( WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. {hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 1998/99 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax be used to pay, in whole or in part. the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Payment of principal of and interest on anv outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds: Payment of costs and expenses or' authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 5: The special taLx shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taLces arc colh'ctcd. ~lnd st~all lw stibjccl to the same penalties and same t)roccdure and sale in cases ,~I' any ch*linq~cn('v h,r ;t(t x'atlorcm laxos. and lhe Tacx Collector is special trax. -. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax". or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retaine. d for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1998. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk q5 Resolution No. Page 3 Executed this 15th day of April, 1998, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FAC1~.ITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 EXHIBIT "A" Resolution Paat The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 1996/97. SPECIAL TAX "A" - DRAINAGE FACILITIES There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A", which are identified as follows: DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessors's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued as of May 31 of any year. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax "A:, is: (i) owned by a public entity; (ii) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or (iii) zoned as open space. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL TAX "A" RATES The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the authorized Special Tax "A" rates for Fiscal Year 1998/99 are as follows: Taxing Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $944 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * B. Residential II $699 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * C. Residential III $524 per year (2,564-3.076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * D. Residential Class IV $420 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Resolution No. Page 5 Residential Class V (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) T~x R~lc $349 per year F. Residential Class VI $245 per year (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * G. Commercial or industrial property $2.030 per acre per year ** UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property $1,526 per acre per year *** The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling unit. The acreage of a commercial or industrial property shall mean the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX "A" Special Tax "A" shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax "A" revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of authorized public facilities. which may include, without limitation. payment of debt service on any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District: replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness: funding of any required sinking fund necessary to pay for future public facilities or debt service; or direct payment for public facilities (CFD Expenses"). The annual levy of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1: The Community Facilities Distn¢'t sitall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses which must be paid for frmn ,%pccial Tax "A' revenues collected durin,a the Fiscal Year for which the Special l'aL\ ','\" lcvv is to be ~,stablished (the "Required Special Tax "A" Revenue"). STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special 'Fax 'A" rate, not to exceed 91% of the maximum authorized Special Tax 'A' rate. applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax "A" revenue in the Fiscal Year of the levy equal to the l~equired Special Tax "A" Revenue for such Fiscal Year shall be levied on all Developed Property. Resolution No. Pa~e 6 STEP Spt~cidJ 'I'~LX :\ Revenue. l l~atl t)cn ~'i~t,~c ,~I I I~c HIaLXillltlII1 authorized Special "A" tart5 applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Undeveloped Property. STEP 4: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 5: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, the Community Facilities District shall: Ao Compare (i) the Special Tax "A" rate which would be levied on each Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (ii) the product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A". The Base Maximum Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to $0.054 per square foot of the lot or parcel. If the product described in (ii) above exceeds the Special Tax "A" rate described in (i) above tbr any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax "A" rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed the product described in (ii) above necessary to generate the additional Special Tax "A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues. SPECIAL TAX '~!" - LAW ENFORCEMENT All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax "B". The authorized Special Tax "B" rates for Fiscal Year 1998-1999 are as follows: Taxing Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $1.00 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * B. Residential Class II S1.00 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * C. Residential Class iii S 1.00 per year {2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * D. Residential Class IV $1.00 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Resolution No. Page 7 Go Residential ('l~tss V (2,051-2,307 square leer dwelli~'g unit living area} Residential Class VI (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Commercial or industrial property · ~ I .()0 per year $1.00 per year $1,000 per acre per year ** D4 T£: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL JACK LAM, .4.1. C.P., CITY MANAGER CITY OF RANCHO CUC.4MONGA FROM: RODNEY HOOPS, CHIEF OF POLICE RANCHO CUCAMONG,4 POLICE DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: POLICE REPORTS ON CITY PROPERTY The attached outlines the reports taken for calendar year 1997 and January 1, 1998, to March 31, 1998. As you can see, the numbers are very low considering the number of people that utilize these facilities. RRH:lrg RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS TAKEN - 1997 THROUGH 1998 TO DATE METROLINK Grand Theft Auto Mentally Ill Subject Towing of Vehicles 1997 TOTAL 1 1 2 4 1998 None LIBRARY 1997 Petty Theft 1 False Personation of Another 1 Hit & Run TC 1 TOTAL 3 1998 Incident Report 1 · TOTAL 1 LIONS gt,.nT & wg.n'r 1997 Vandalism 2 TOTAL 2 1998 ]3mzla~ 1 Bama'y 1 TOTAL 2 FAMILY SPORTS CENTER 1997 None 1998 None SENIOR CENTER None 1998 None RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORTS TAKEN AT THE EPIC CENTER 1997 - Types of Reports Taken Burglary Grand Theft Grand Theft Auto Petty Theft Vandalism 1 2 2 2 4 Assault Battery 1 3 County Code Violations Curfew Disturbing The Peace Drank In Public DUI False Info to Peace Officer Found Property Incident Reports L~m/~lm Li~.. Plat~ Narcotic Violatiom Non-Injury TC Resisting Arrest Towing of Vehicles I 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 8 TOTAL 42 1998 - Types of Re!~orts Taken (Mareh 31. 1998) Attempt Burglary Burglary Grand Theft Auto Grand Theft TOTAL 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT I):\'Ft:!: TO: April ~). 1 ~)~)8 Jack Lam. AICP, City Manager Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager BY: Nettie Nielsen, Recreation Supervisor SUBJECT: After School Program Update The State of California's decision to offer incentives to public elementary schools to reduce class room sizes for lower grades has resulted in our local elementary schools lowering class sizes. This reduction has meant the additional hiring of teachers as well as placed a strain on current facility capacities. Portable classrooms and every available space is used to accommodate the additional classes. This, in turn, has affected the YMCA, which provides before and after school programs for elementary ages on selected school sites. Previously, the YMCA utilized portables provided by the schools. During the past two years, the YMCA has been faced with the challenge of finding suitable space on the campuses, purchasing their own portables, or discontinuing service when they do not have a facility to run the program. The YMCA is diligently working to keep service levels up. The City of Rancho Cucamogna, recognizing a need for alter school program for middle and junior high school students, recently started a program at the RC Family Sports Center. The City received a $30,000 grant from the State of California to develop an at~er school program for at-risk or latch key children. This grant was a one time distribution of funds and no matching funds from the City were required. The grant has allowed us to transform the multi-purpose room at the Family Sports Center into a teen room containing a large screen television, two pool tables, ping pong, electronic dart boards, and Nintendo systems. We are continuing to evaluate the program and add items as necessary. Four Recreation Leaders staff the program, which operates Mondays through Fridays from 2:00 - 6:00 p.m. During the week of April 6 (Spring Break Week) the program is operating from 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. The program began on Monday March 30 and will continue until the end of the school year. Daily attendance is climbing, with an average of 50 - 60 attending per day. During Spring Break Week up to 90 teens had come through in one day. Reaction from the students and parents has been very positive. :ierry B,~q::ulwood-- - Deputy City Manager CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 15. 1998 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack L~trn, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Jerry Fulwood, Acting Community Services Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACII,IT!ES UPDATE Lions East Community Center:. · Contractor is completing minor punch list items, A ribbon cutting was held for The Enviromnental Learning Center on Thursday, April 2. Lions West Community Center: · Framing is complete. Interior work occurring includes electrical, and plumbing. Exterior work includes masonry construction, and concrete. Progress on the exterior has been delayed due to min. Rancho Cueamonga Senior Center: · Construction on the parking lot is scheduled to begin on April 20. Residents and citizens have been notified of the pending construction. RC Family Sports Center: · City staff met with Lewis Homes regarding outstanding warranty issues, several of %rhich have been corrected. Update meetings will be ongoing for several months to address issues as they arise. · Minor items which are still to be provided include installation of windows in the south corridor looking into the basketball courts, room signage, and an illuminated building sign. Skate Park: · Plan check comments have been returned to the consultant and the final plan submittal, which includes the Phase II design, is being prepared. J CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 1 $, 1998 Page 2 Stadium: · The re-aiming of the lights on the fields has been completed. · Cross-aisle waterproofing has been delayed because of rain, however it is expected to be completed by April 30. Heritage and Red Hill Parks: · Repairs have been completed for the poles and the lights for the 90' baseball field are up and functional. Purchase Orders have been received tor the replacement of the pole at the equestrian rink that fell. The pole and lights were ordered in late March, and should be received in approximately 4-6 weeks. · The Red Hill Park Nursery fence upgrade project has been completed. This project, which began last month at the request of the two neighbors bordering the north side of the nursery, is intended to discourage people from crossing the residents' prope~ and jumping. the fence to gain access to the park. So far, it looks like it is working as planned. Eftwanda Creek Park: · Award of the design contract for the Eftwanda Creek Ballfield Light Project occurred at the March 18th City Council Meeting. Anticipate ~ to b~ completed by August. AH Park Facilities: ' · Operation "Blue Pole" has been completed. ~ staff painted the poles on all basketball courts the color blue. The painting was suggested by the City's insurance i~r Ron Fritz, as a menmum to. reduce possible injurious contact with the poles by basketball players. B. COMMUNITY NERVlCF~N UPDATI~ Seniors: · The Seniors were entertained by the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Chorale at their Spring Fling event on April 9, 1998. This annual event was co-sponsored by the Senior VIP Club. The second annual St~ Out for Senior Centers Walk will take place on Saturday, May 16, 1998 from 9:00 a.m. until 12 noon at Red Hill Community Park. Event includes a walk to celebrate senior centers week, entertainment and a Health Information Fair. Teens: · The Aftre' ,e, ehool Teen Program got off to a great start during the last week of March. Over one hundr~ and fiRy (150) youngsters participated in the After School Teen Program during its first week and enjoyed activities at the R.C. Family Sports Center which included, billiards, racquetball, basketball, Nintendo, movies and much more. Staff is continuing to market the program through flyers to the middle/junior high schools, press releases and television spots on cable stations. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 15, 1998 Page 3 Teen Leamixfg'Center - Registrations are being taken and interviews are being conducted to place teens into the summer recreation program as volunteer assistants. Last year fifty (50) youngsters participated in the Teen Learning Center. Teen Recreation Activi~ Club (TRAC) - The Night on the Town Babysitting service has seen a recent growth in attendance in the twice monthly babysitting service - averaging 35-40 children per night. The TRAC members will receive their annual service award recognition awards at the May 21, 1998 Park and Recreation Commission meeting. Youth Activities: On Saturday April 11, 1998 The Happy Crowd will be returning ~o the Epicenter for a second year performance just for kids and their families. This free community concert will take place at 11:00 a.m. and seating is on a first-come, first-served basis. Rancho Grande Kiwanis will be providing volunteer service that day to assist with facility set-up, ushering and clean-up. (Staff will update the Council on the success of this activity in the May Park and Recreation Facilities Update.) Summer Camp registration information was mailed out with the Spring issue of The Grapevine. This summer we are offering: Play Canlp for the 1-5 year old; Canlp Cucamonga Kinder Curr~ for kids 4-6 y~am old;.' C'~r~Ch~'anmngg l)~y C_.anli~ for youngsters 6-12 years old; Cunli~ !~.fiw,na, a sporta c. mnp for kids 7-11 years old that specializes in activities for the physically active youngster;, Cm~,~r gu,kethall Cunlp for boys and girls 7-15 years old will help youngsters improve their basketball skills. Registration begun March 16 and continues throughout the summer until all spots are full. Plook Fair - On April 30, 1998 a Book Fair will be held at the Civic Center (Tri-Communities Room) from 9:004:00 p.m.. The fair will feature books for all ages. Proceeds from the Book Fair will benefit the Youth Division. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center: · The Center continues to be extremely busy. facility from March 6 - April 6, 1998: 871 drop-in youth basketball players The following information summarizes use of the 914 drop-in adult basketball players 155 drop-in youth racquetball players 557 drop-in adult racquetball players 16 adult volleyball teams (128 participants) 22 adult basketball teams (176 participants) 3 leagues of single racquetball players (18 participants) 2 leagues of double racquetball players (26 participants) 6 youth enrolled in racquetball classes 8 adults enrolled in racquetball classes CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 15, 1998 Page 4 23 classes of?azzercise (1,200 participants) 24 teams of indoor soccer (240 participants) 2.136 ~ectators 6,435 Grand Total Number of Participants/Speatators March 6 through April 6, 1998 during time frame of Youth Sports: Youth Basketball - Twelve (12) boys and girls yotith basketball teams participated in the Inland Valley Municipal Athletic Association Tournament. Games were played against the following jurisdictions: Fontan& Riverside, Rialto, Corona, Norco, Montelair, Banning and Coachella Valley. All Rancho Cucamonga teams won at least one game in their respective tournaments. The Boys "C" Division (8 & 9 year olds) CAVS captured the IVMAA championship and took second place in the Southern California Municipal Athletic Association Championships. Registration for Spring Youth Indoor Soccer, Youth Volleyball and Aquatics is currently taking place. Youth Roller Hockey has 400 children participating in the Spring League. Pea Wee ~ !a~ 300 children registered for the Spring Seaaon. Adult S!mrt~: · Adult Soccer currently has 26 Men's and Women's Full Field Soccer teams and 24 Men's and Women's 6-a.~ide · Adult Tennis currently has 38 men and women participating in 4 leagues. · Adult Flnlt, Football has 80 m~n participating on 10 teams. · Adult Softball ha.q 2,448 participants participating in 153 teams. Satellite Registration Location: · Community members can now register at Lions East Community Center for recreation classes, programs and activities. The satellite location is open Monday-Thursday from 10:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. and Friday and Saturday from 9:00 a.m. until 12 noon. Community Wide Special Events: · This years Cinco de Mayo celebration will be held on May 3rd fi'om 11:00-4:00 p.m. at Old Town Park. The event will include Folldorico Dancers, live music, game booths/br the children, door prizes and great food. · Art in the Park ,will be held this year on May 9th from 10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. at Red Hill Community Park. This event will include art and craft booths, live entertainment and great food. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 15, 1998 Page 5 Trips and Tours: % · PlaTa Garibaldi - April 25, 1998 - This dinner theater is named for the celebrated square in Mexico City. Guests have the opportunity to discover the excitement of Mexico, and the music, dance and unique cultural entertainment of other Latin American countries such as Argentina, Peru and Bolivia. Cost is $39 - adults; $17 - children; includes combo dinner plate, dessert, drink and tip. (Space is still available) · Amtrack to Santa Barbara - May 16, 1998 - Join us for a sight-seeing trip up the beautiful coast of California. Shopping, lunch and Steams Wharf is on the agenda for this fun filled day. Cost is $42 per person. (Son3/, trip is full) · Catalina Island - June 6, 1998 - Visit the beautiful island off the coast of California for shopping, dining, snorkeling and a variety of tours. Cost: $62 for adults; $43 for children age 12 and younger. (Space is still available) · Hollywood Rowl - July 4, 1998 - What better way to celebrate the 4th that a picnic (on your own), a fabulous concert and tremendous fireworks show. Cost is $40/person. (Space is still available) · Getty Museum - August 30, 1998 - August is many months away, but the Getty is advertising that their reservations are full through Fall. With that fact in mind you might want to join us for this wonderful trip to the most tallted about musem~ Cost: $1 Z/person. (Space is still available) Human Services: · Commodity Disaribntion - First Monday of the month fi'om 1:30 - 3:00 p.m. at the Senior Center. USDA surplus food products are distributed to low income Rancho Cucamonga residents on a first come, first served basis. (May 4, 1998) · "The Doctor is In" - Free monthly seminars on topics of interest. All seminars take place at the Senior Center between 12 noon - 2:00 p.m. April 21 - Managing Diabetes. May 19 - Alzheimer's Disease. A special evening program is scheduled for April 28 - Osteoporosis An Ounce of Prevention. Featured speaker: Dr. Harvey D. Cohen. · l,iving. I,o~miRit and I.aughin~ in the 90's - Bi-monthly seminars for senior citizens. All seminars take place at the Senior Center between I0:30-11:30 a.m. April 8 - Proper Food Choices During Stressful Times; April 22 - Appropriate Clothing Choices While Exercising. · Elder Law Seminars - Monthly seminars for senior citizens. All seminars take place at the Senior Center between 11:00-12 noon. April 24 - The Use of Annuities in Retirement Planning. Private counseling also available by appointment the second Friday of the month between 12 noon -2:00 p.m.. · Senior Information and Assistance - Referral service available at the Senior Center by appointment on the 4th Thursday of the month between the hours of 12:30-2:00 p.m. Service is provided by the County of San Bernardino, Department of Aging and Adult Services. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE April 15, 1998 Page 6 Senior Van Trans!~ol'tation: · Staff spoke with AI Newman, President of the Rancho Cucamonga/Ontario Service Club on Friday, April 3rd regarding the Club's ability to provide the senior van transportation program as outlined in previous conversations. Mr. Newman stated that he would have an answer for us on Monday, April 6th. At the time this report was prepared staff had not heard back from Mr. Newman. Vieroam Memorial Moving Wall: · Staff has received notification that the Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall will be in Rancho Cucamonga between October 23 - 29, 1998. Engineering and Community Services staff have met and have confirmed the Epicenter east soccer field for its display. City event team meetings will begin shortly to address the on-going coordination of this exciting upcoming event. Epicenter: · Staff is working with the following representatives for possible events at the Epicenter: Comrmmity Services Depamnent - Children's Concert - April 11, 1998 Pq:}id AC Co~ - CtmUivc Film M~m-~- A!~ 16, 1998 California A~xi~ion of School Tmmportafion Offiei~ - School Bu~ Roadeo - April 18, 1998 R.C. Rotary/Police Department/Quakes - DARE Baseball Clinic - May 17, 1998 Mu~ular DysU'ophy Association- Fundraiser- May 20, 1998 AB Miller High School - Gra&u~on - Ju~ 10, 1998 Rancho Cue, amonga High School - CmuhuUion - Jun~ 11, 1998 Marka Cablevision - M-ear Races (benefits 1LC. YMCA) - June 27, 1998 Commtmity Servic~ Department - Founder~ Day Creation - November 14, 1998 Respectfully sulmfitt~ '~Acting Community Services Director RG:JF:KME 04/15/1qq8 ~S:55 5267449931 E_-,~ NETWORk; PAGE Protecting and Conservin9 Bioiogica! Diversity, Native Plants, Nat:Jim Animals and Native Lands Vera ~ $hoshone-Gabri~ino Iqation cuR~ral Affairs Dire-tot L~.ona KliFpstein, Co-Founder Cortserval~on Programs Director Douglas Doe~ok~, Treasurer Poli%-y Programs Coordinator Science Programs Coordinator Danid Pa~t~on, Ecolo]~'t Desert ProD-ams Coordinator Peninsular Ranges Coordinator K-atlT I(nigt~ Public ^traits Coastal W~dands Coordinator Elizabeth Frauds, Public ^fhim At'royo 5eoa Coordinator 5an Bernardino Valley Coordinator Inter'faith Outreach 04,/15/'1998 lg:55 6267449931 ESA NETWORK PAGE 02 Spirit of the Council Protecting and Conserving Biological Diversity, Notire Plants, AJarire Animals and lq~f:ive Lands April 15, 1998 Vera Rocha, Co-Founder 5hoshone-Gabrieli~o Nation £ultu~al Affairs Director L~o~m Klippatein, Co-Fmmder Cons~rvati~ P~O~',,~'L~ Dirge'tot DouglaS Do~dce, Trea~rer Polic~ Proo~rarns Coordinator Sf. eve~ Fisher, Ecologist $denc~ Proof'ams Coordinator Daniel Pe~'tersc~% Ecolo~st ~ Prograrr~ Coor~nator PenJna-ular Ralqges Coordina4.or Mayor & City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 Attn.; Mr. Markman, City Atlorney Mr. Brad Buller, Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga PLanning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91729 Attn.; Rebecca Van Buren and Nancy Fong RE: Envtronmentai Impact Report-General Plan Amendments 96-03 & 97-01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96-01 & 97-01/Edison Company SCHtt 97071043, San Bernardino County INTRODUCTION Spirit of the Sage Councit (Sage Counci0 is a grassroots conservation coalition and non-profit project of Social and Environmental Entrepreneum (SEE, Inc.), Maltbu, CA., Based in Southern California, the Sage Council was co-founded by the tribal leaders of the indigenous Shoshone-Gabr~e#no Nation and currently supports the conservation perspectives and public trust interests for over 30 conservation organizations trtroughout the United States, Mexico and British Columbia. The Sage Council works cooperatively with conserva~otl groups, scientists and legal experts throughout the U.S. in protecting endangered specie~ by applying sound methods of conservation biology (best scientific data), put)Itc education and through the enforcement of regulations. Kathy Knight., Ptd~bc ~ Coastal Wet/a.ds Coordinator Elizabeth Francia. Public Affairs Arroyo Seco Coordinator AI Kelly,, wildtile Biologist 5an Bmmardino Valley CoordirmLor Udo Wald, Public Educatic~ Interfaith Ou~-each Coordinator Experience Our d/rectors, coordinators and members have been involved with, and have parfic~patecl in numerous regional conservation planning efforts underway in the counties of San D~ego, Riverside, San 8ernardin0, Orange, Los Angeles, and Yolo, California since 1990, The Sage Council is mere than familiar with the requirements of the Endangered 8pec/es Act (FSA) and Section 10(a) "Habitat Conservation Phans and Incidental Take Permas' {HC:P/ITP). The Sage Council and our members has continued, since 1991 to notify the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) of the ecologicar importance of conserving "public trust" natural resources and tands. More specifically we have requested that the City actively conserve Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) and Alluvial Sage Scrub natural communities within their jurisdiction and sphere of influence that are designated 81.1 'very threatened," and habitat for rare, threatened and endangered species. in addition, we have repeatedly requested that the City ensure the consmvafion of Cultural Resources of the indigenous Shoshone "Gabrfelino" Tribe, of 'California City of Rancho Cucamonga/Mayor & City Council Page Two Mission Indians," within their ancestral territory and village of Cucamong(n)a, including lands of ethnobotanical eigni6cance, and regestered or eligable archeological sites. It is the intent of the Sage Council to provide substantial comments, criticisms, and recommendations to tl~e "responsible" government agency and City for the Administrative Record, and to assist the City and Council Members in making a decision that upholds the "public trust'' in local government and applicable State public codes and Federal regulations that protects biological and cultural resources. Position On 13shall of our effected members that re~ide in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino (County), the Sage Council opposes the current I~Oposal as referenced. In light of inadequate mifiga'don measures for biological and cultural resources, and lack of a full range of Alternatives to the proposals, the Sage Council mua'. request the No Project/No Amendment Alternative. In addition, we request that the City Council return the EtR to the City Planning Department for amendments that would ensure that environmental impacts to Biological and Cultural Resources have been adequately addressed and m'rtJgated for~ Sage Council members an(I public citizens are personally injured by the loss of biological diversity, natural open spaces, public trust natural resources and lands in the City, County, and State. Our members and public citizens currentty enjoy natural opens spaces for their visual beauty, sustaining flora and fauna, outdoor education, scientific pursuits, indigenous Native American ceremonies, spiritual renewal, recreation, and nature photography. The City and Edison Company have not provided for adequate avoidance and/or m'rtiga§on of the States "very threatened" RAFSS natural community on site. The City has continued to allowed the incremental loss and destruction of RAFSS despite objections raised by the Sage Council, Ca#fomia Departrrmnt of Fish & Game (CDFG), and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and to the detriment of the environment. The proposed Edison project end General Plan amendments are yet another example of the City's disregard and environmental negligence. The Sage Council has reviewed the comments made by the California Department of Fish & Game (CDFG) and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, including the City and consultants (LSA) response in regards to proDosed amendments and CEQA documents. The Sage Councfl generel/y supports those comment teltern submitted to the City by CDFG (dated 4-2-98 and 4-12-98) and FWS (dated 12-23-97) in regards to the referenced proposals, EIR, RAFSS, and Sensitive Habitats. We ternrod the City Council and Edison Company/project proponents that the Courts recognize CDFG and FWS as experts, deferring to the age13cies recommendations unless overwhelming scientific evidence and best methods prove otherwise. It wo~ld be prudent for the City and Edison to follow the recommendations made by the agencies, rather than relying upon scientifically unsubstantuated and unconclusive opinions or speculations made by the CEy Planning staff and paid consultants. Rive~ldeall Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub/Alluvial Scrub "An estimated 90 percent of the histodc acreage coastal sage scrub vegetation has been lost as a result of development and land conversion (see Westman 1981a, 1981b, Barbour and Major 1977), leaving coastal sage scrub as one of the most depleted I~abitet types in tl~e United States (Kirkpatrick and Hutchinson 1977, Axehod 1978, Klopetek etal. 1979, Westman 1987, O'Leary 1990~. The City has been informed since 1991 of the importance of conserving the remaining RAFSS habitat within their jurisdiction.Then again, on March 13, 1992, the FWS wro{e in letter to Supervisor Jon MikeIs that... "[A]lluviat scrub is a type of coastal sage scrub. Alluvial scrub habitat is found only along the coastal draining slopes of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains. It is estimated that only 5% of this habitat remains. As you may know.. this loss is the result of residential and commercial development, water diversions, and flood control structures .... Considerable interest has developed regarding the protection of biologically functioning alluvial scrub habitat .... in addition, the area's many residential developments either proposed, planned, or under construction in San Bernardino County will eliminate significant acreage .... The Sen/ice suggests that the County of San Bernardino Planning Department consider the remaining alluvial scrub habitat within their jurisdiction of high priority for protection and p~ssibly develop a special planning district. The environmental constraints should be identified forst and any development that would not impact these constraints could be considered.' 84,"15/1998 16:55 62674499~1 ESA NETWCRK PAGE 84 City of Rancho Cucamonga/Mayor & City Council Page Three The City also sponsored a workshop on RAFSS along with FWS and members of the Sage Council. This workshop was video taped and is baleveal to be in the C~/archival records. However, the City must also consider the significant environmental changes in RAFSS since 1992 regarding continued loss of habitat acres and increased threats. RAFSS Is much mere threatened now than in 1992. CDFG recommended a 5:1 ratio replacement for RAFSS in their comments on the North EtiwanOa Specific Plan. Unfortunately, the CDFG and FWS only received a 3:1 ratio habitat replacement for the Rt. 30 expansion, rather than the much needed 5:1 r~tigation. Knowing that RAFSS has substantially decreased in remaining habitat acres and more threatened than ever before, the City and Edison has failed address this issue or mitfgate at a 5:1 or even a 3:1 ratio for habitat replacement in the final CEQ, A documents. The Fn/VS end CDFG concur that the City and Edison have not adequately addressed or mitigated for proposed impacts to disturbed, yet significant, RAFSS habitat on site. In consideration of approximately 50-acres of dPaturt)ed RAFSS on site; the Sage Council recommends that the City request that Edison avoid additional impacts to the natural community and/or require Edison to acquire for conservation purposes 150-acres of higher quality RAFSS habitat adjacent to or contiguous with the North Etawanda Preserve (County Open Space District (OSD) 1). The Sage Council is aware that there are "wfl#ng sellers" within the area that the City has also mapped as a Resource Conservation area in regards to the North Etiwanda Specific Plan/Resource Management Plan. This option should have been incruded in the FEIR as the Enviror~mentalJy Superior and Preferred A~ternative for the referenced project and amendments. In addition, adopting such an AltematNe would contribute the City and County's obligations and Intentlona~ goal of the proposed MSHCP and NCCP for the region in a positive way. The Sage Council encourages the City make such a pos'rdve contribu§on and take a leadership role dudng the interim planning process. Another aspect of the dralt and FEIR that the Sage Council finds erroneous end misleading ~s the Interchangeable descdptior~s of vegetative componarrts of RAFFS habitat. Apparently, the EIR identifies coastal sage scrub and buckwheat scrub to avoid having to address ar)d mitigate for RAFSS habitat as it is State designated of S1.1 "very threatened" (Natural Diversity Data Base), Thus, requiring mitigation pursuant to CEQA, the NCCP Act, and the California Native Plant Protection Act. Acoording to state and federal agency botanists and plant ecologists (personal communicaBon with Mary Meyer, CDFG, and Scott Eliason, FWS) "buckwheat scr~Jb.' as referred to in the dralt and FEIR, is not a separate vegetation type or classification, bu~ is a plant spades that Is a known component of RAFSS. Depending upon the maturity stage of RAFSS habitat, natural or man made disturbances to RAFSS habitat areas, there will be var~ng mosaics of dominate plant species throughout the ecosystems patchwork quilt resemblance. Buckwheat is a RAFSS indicator and but one of the numerous species that contributes to the biological divemiry of the natural community. Buckwheat is regarded as evidence, along with the topographic placement of the subject lands, that the project site is RAFSS habitat and that impacts must be mitigated for. The Sage Council recommends that the City Council require redesign of the Edison project and appropriate proied Ai~ernafives to development, rather than resting upon "presumptions," or the yet unapproved and Incomplete MultiSpecies Habitat Consel"ration Plan (MSHCP) and Natural Communities Conservation Planning (NCCP) program. Such 'plans" are not an existing conservation provisions and do not provide rr~tigat/on, but are only virtual concepts. The Ctty's remarks and response to comments on thefiR, specifically those made to U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) are erroneous and misleading in regards to the proposed MSHCP, NCCP, or Plan MOts. (see also Shilling, F. 1997, and Save Our Springs AI!ianv-~ v. Babbitt, TX.) In addition, the entire HCP process that Is currently under, ray would be thrown into further turmoil in regards to the rnisappropria§on and fraudulent use of State and Federal funds, if the City again refused to follow the permi~tin~ agencies recommendations and approved another development project In Subregion 13.0. Is the City in compliance with the County's contracts regarding conservation planning? Furthermore, is the County acting as the lead agency for the C~ In regards to conservation of endangered species and habitats? As far as the Sage Council is aware, the answe~ is YES! Yet, the Planning Staff have failed to give any mention of the City's current responsibilities in regards to these matters, including the regulatory requirements for NCCP particpants to comply with the NCCP Conservation Guidelines and Procedures, pursuant the federal ESA Section 4(d) Special Rule for the Coastal California Gnatcatcher. As the City has been made aware, the proposed MSHCP and NCCP are "habitat based" plans that are intended to conserve habitat and regional biodiversity for certain identified or "target" species. The City must comply with such regulatory requirements, including the "Terms and Conditions" of the Special Rule as set forth in the FWS Biological Opinion. The State NCCP Act and subregional plans must be consistent FJ4/'lS/19'_~S ]6:55 52h_-7449'_~3~. ES',& NETI....IE'RK P~GE 85 Crty of Rancho Cucarrmnga/Mayor & City Council Page Four with the Special Rule. Thus, all intodin projects within CDFG and FVVS delineated NCCP subregions must also be consistent with the Special Rule and NCCP Conservation and Process Guidelines as stipulated In ~1 of the Terms and Conall'dons. Therefore, the Sage Council contends that the USFWS, CDFG, County, City, and Standard Pacific are in violation of the "Terms and Conditions" of the Special Rule, and Section 4(d), 7, 9, and 10(a)(1)(B) of the ESA. (see "Terms and Conditions" 1-§ per BO (1-6-93-FW-37)), November 10, 1993 More specifically, the responsible agencies shoulcl review page 4 of the BO; "The Service is presuming that the goals and strategy of the program will be followed fully by the participating parties. if the presumption is correct, p~eserve compmmi$ir~l devetopment~ will not be proposed or approved by participants in the NCCP program during the interim period.", and then #1 on page 9; "The Service sha~l ensure that both the NCCP Conservation and Process Guidelines are implemented to accoml~Sh the goals of the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 and the State's Natural Community Conservation Planning Act of lgg 1." (empha~L~ added). The County, as lead agency for the proposed MSHCP ar)d NCCP, has received substanclal State and Federal funding as one of '[t]he Southern California Counties participating in the NCCP" Program (see HR Budget Report of September 1997). It appears that the County, City and Edison have failed to comply with the NCCP Conserval~on and Process Guidelines as demonstrated in the FEIR. The NCCP Scientific Review Panel (SRP) identified the project area as *high quality habitat" and their opinions are considered the "best available scientific data" according to the Special Rule/Conservation and Process Guidelines. Therefore, this habitat should not be removed or degraded dudng the MSHCP and NCCP interim daveh3pment process. "'the most certain environmental impact of any development project is the reduction and increased tnsutarization of available habitat, otherwise known as habitat fragmentation (Wilcox 1984, Wilcox and Murphy 1985). Habitat fragmentation has become the principal anthropogenic impact with which the scientific d~scipline of conservation I~ology is concerned. It is obvious and well accepted among ecologists that "habitat fragmentation is the most sedous threat to biological diversity and is the pdmary cause of the present ex, tinc'aon crisis" (Wilcox and Murphy t985). No mitigation application is likely to eliminate the impact of any development p[oject on hahilar fragmentaMon, whether the strategy includes minimization of spaces take, translocation, habitat "enhancement" in a reserve, acreage replacement in the form of easement or fee title purchase, nor the establishement of "preserves" interconnected by habitat "corridors" Deveopment pro,acts almost always reduce the spatial areas within which the legally rare species can survive, and they reduce the capacity of the landscape to provide lot the dispersal and interchange of individuals from mebapopulations. Fragmentation also increases habitat edges and their associated edge effects (Yahnor 1988). Reduced spatial extent and increased edge-to-interior ratio correlate with more frequent intrusion and establishment of exotic species populations and other effects (Smallwood 1994). Land conversion extending ngMt up to the reserve boundary w~f reduce the effectiveness of the boundary and of l:he resolve ~unctlon well beyond the physical/i~liMcal boundary of the reserve (Schonewald-Cox and Bayless 1986). Therefore, the City must take adequate administrative steps to protect remaing habitat areas, including patches, corridors or buffers, and enhance disturbed habitat P, AFSS areas to benefit the recovery of listed or 'target" species as identified in the MSHCP MOU. Furthermore, recent research results indicate a consislent pattern of dynamic spatial distributions among Species populations. That is,[fire disturbance and habitat type conversion effect the Coastal California Gnatcatcher and other species] populations usually are crustareal spatiatlf (Grog.Smith 1983, Smallwood 1995, Smallwood and Schonewald 1996), and these clusters shift locations through time (Taylor and Taylo~ 1977'; den Boer 1981; Hahski 1994). Once the populal~on density has been defined, its life span is limited, because nature is always achelying some balance between dispersive and congregatory behaviors (Taylor and Taylor 1977). By constraining populations to "l:~eserves" that are some lraction of the spatial area of existing habitat, and by not guaranteeing contiguity of the mitigation preserve.~, the HCP/ITP [Project] planners deny the fisted species and other species the ability to naturally shift to new locations_ Contiguity has been shown to be very important for population sizes among habitat patches for amphibians (Loan and Verboom 1990) and small mammals (La Polta and Barrett 1993), and its role In ecosystem CI~ of Rancho CucamongaJMayor & CiW Coundl Page Five fuilcfionelity is e we~t accepted principle among ecologists and conservation biologists (Foreman 1981, V~/cox and Murphy 1985, Turner ~989). The typical HCP/ITP preserves will be mere fragments of previously contiguous habitat. which may very well fail to protect the species, and they certainly will not provide for recovery.' (Smallwood, S. at. al. The NCCP Scientific Review Panel, in drafting the Conservation and Process G~delines, found that revegatation in an unacceptable form of mitigation and cannot be used to substitute in $#u protection of habitat end habitat values (see also Read, E.A., M. Blaine, and P, Bowler, 1996; Fahselt 1988; Griffith at. al 1989; Hollings 1992; Howaid 1§93; Morrison,M at. al 1992; Wilco*x 1984 ). The Sage Council is requesting that the FWS and CDFG support our recommendations, In writing, by requiring the Ctiy to prepare an Addendum to the EIR or Subsequent EIR for public review and comment. The FWE; end CDFG must give the City, and County as the lead and responsible agency for the proposed HCP/NCOP, a wntten notice that the Edison project and General Plan amendments is expected to impact habitats that are expected to effect polentlal core reserves for species survival and/or recovery. The County should also be contacted in writing by the Department and Sewice regarding their NCCP MOU and proposed MSHCP Planning Agreement. As the lead local agency, that has received State and Federal appropriations for their "participation" in the NCCP, the Courtty should notiN the City in writing that they must comply with the NCCP MOU and prevent the destruction of a potential core reserve and wildlife corridor. Although FiNS has provided numerous substantial comment letlers to the City for this proposal and others, including those within the County, the Sage Council is aware that such comments include the folk)wing. "[L/ess then 5% of the orfginal acreage of alluvial fan sage scrub habitat in southern California remains. The Ly#e Creek end Cejon Wash area represenfs ep~ox, 30~ of that habitat remaining. The continued removal of alluvial fan scrub habitat is likely to result the listing of several candidate species that are known only from this heb#at.' (emphasis edctecl) (FWS letter to the County dated 2-21-92), In addition, the FWS leffer of January 7, 1994 to Sen Bernardino County Flood Control, Re: CalMer Company operaohs end lease agreements in Lytle Creek and Cajon Wash (1-6-94-TA-42), as previously mentioned, states, "[A]ny irn13acts that could not be avoided would need to be minimized as much as possible. Impacts remaining would then need to be rectified or compensated for through a combination of restoration, e~harmement, acquisition, o~ preservation of alluvial fen scrub habitat. Due to the difficulty in revegetating 0.e. meeting) this I~ant community, acquisition and preservation has been pursued as a form of mifigal~on in similar cases. Because this by itself still resu~ in a net loss of habitat, other forms of rnltlgatlon would need to take place concu[~ently. However, without conservation of a significant portion of alluvial fan scrub habitat in it natural state for future plant and animal recruitment, no amount of revaga~a~on will be successful..." The Sage Council believes that such FWS comments are also applicable to the proposed Edison Project and General Plan amendments. Biological As~,essm~nts & Mitigation Requirements Although the consultants may have not acknowledged any listed endsgered species occudng on the project site, it does not negate the ecological importance of the effected area in regards to potential recovery habitat for species that have not yet received recovery plans or designated critical habitat required by the ESA. In addition, the ESA requires the conservation of "ecosystems." The LI.S. Supreme Court has found that the intent of the Endangered Spades Act is "to hall and reverse the trend towards species extinctions, whatever the cost. This is effectuated not only In the stated policies of the Act, but in literally every section of the statute." Babbitt v. Sweet Home. C!~apter (1995) 132 LEd 2d 597. In cor~lderation of the recovery needs of a species the "public trust" agencies must identify the range and distribution of the species populations within the historic, current, end presently remaining special habitat area, including an analysis of threats. Presence/absense surveys on a project site do not adequately assess the species needs or threats, but result In unconctusive and erroneous assumptions that the Incremental habitat loss, whether occupied or unoccupied, on site 04/15/1998 16:55 626?449921 ESA NETWORK PAGE 07 City of Rancho Cucamonga/Mayor & City Council Page Six is insignificant or minimal. The species surveyor must not only utilize FWS and/or CDFG survey protocol, but abo "best scientific methods" when reaching conclusions regarding mitigation and monitoring. The species and/or habitat surveyor or biological consultant must consider the species population dynamics and genetic interchange. While the City and/or agencies may require only species presence/absence surveys by protocol, the Sage Council recommends that the City ensures that "best scientific methods" are utilized (Grinnell, J. 1928; Kerr, J.R. 1994; Kotlier, N,B., and J.A, Wlens, 1990; Mafia, G.E and C.R, Carroll, 1994 ) that can withstand a legal challenge. It Is our opinion, and that of quall~ed sclen!~fic experts that the FWS species survey protocol is often Issa than adequate and sometimes 'negotiated" rather than "the best" method (e.g. Coastal California Gnatcatcher survey protocol is lea~ than adequate according to species' experts). The fitness of the species in relation to habYmt components and utilization must De considered in meeting conservation requirements (Braden G. et. el. 1997). As stated, the species natural distribution, population dynamics, populaUon ~,iabiity analysis/risk assessments, and current status must be considered in relation to effects and adequate mitigation measures (Smallwood, S. et. el. 1997). These referenced scientific reports are availal~e upon request from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Carlsbad, CA., and should have been considered by the biological consultant. Wildl/fe Corridors & Refugia Habitat While the City artd Consultants response to agency comments touch upon the problems with roads In regards to habitat fragmentation or obsticales to species natural movement corridors, they also fail to recognize that species movement, while jeopardized by traffic on Highland Ave., nevertheless does still occur. Sage Council members have on several observed mule deer in the early morning hours crossing Highland Ave. from the eastern side of Day Creel( channel. In addition, we have recorded deer tracks, through photographs, found o~ the west side of Day Creek on both sides of Highland Ave. The City has on record the EIR for 4th Street Rock Project that actually m'['dgated impacts to setting aside habitat aloflg the west side of Day Creek charmer to conserve the %vildlife corridor." The Sage Council previously voiced our opposition to FVVS regarding the Rt.30 E. xpar~ion at Day Creek, for those reasons mentioned, and recommended that an overpass be built at the Day Creek wildlife corridor to prevent any additional road Idll risks. UnforttJnately, porttics have weighed on the biological needs. Therefore, it is critical that the City and Edison mitigate impacts to the wildlife corridor, per'gel'ably through in situ conservation and avoidance. The cumulative impacts to the Day Creek wildlife corridor have failed to be adequately addressed or mitigated for in the CEQA documents. Our group encourages the C~ and Edison to activley pursue the possibilities of enhancing the Day Creek wildlife corridor by requesting redesign of Rt. 30 to include an overpass that would allow for large mammal movemerit across what is now Highland Ave-. Such sensilive road building activ'fiJes have occurred in other States, such as Florida wfiere the Fk)rida Panther may travel under highways. Any ramanant wildlife corridor that is still utilized ia of significant biological Importance in the West Valley Foothi~ region of San Bernardino, and other similar foothill cities. Wildfires are an expected occuranco in the City of Rancho Cucamonge and adjacent jurisdictions. Many wildlife species must run and fly for their life when such wildfires occur and may find refuge in the remaining wildlife corridors'and habitat patches on the lower reaches of the alluvial fan ecosystem. So whether the City and Edison have failed to recognize the project site as an actively utilized wildlife corrldol', the,'e is no excuse to additionally fall to recognize this site as potentially important rafugie habitat, or a safe harbor, to sustain numerous species while natural reestablishment of their populations take place. The city should not above any Ix(Hecta that result in the further decline of the species and irmrease the "net losses" of the remaining habitat spaciat area. We refer the City and Edison to the published literature of the ranowned conservation biologist, Dr. Reed Nose (Nose, Reed F., 1991a., Nose, R. 1l)91b., Ncas, R.E 1992), and Marble Mourd:ein Audubon v. Traffic Impacts The Sage Council linda the projected population at buildout and in the population of the region is significantly higher than has been disclosed in the EIR. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 10 year populatmn estimates, in their draft plan, differed by one million for Southern California in 1997. This significant change In population estimates I~as a tremendous effect over the rest of the City's presumptions. In light of the new and significant information regarding population explosion and demographics currently and at build out, the previous erroneous estimates of Average Daily Trips (ADT), at build out and ADT from the Project, need to be recortsldered and corrected. ~4/'15/1998._.16:5S 626?449931 ESA NETWE~RK PAGE 88 City of Rancho CucamongaJMayor & City Council Page Seven The Blockbuster Pavilion, Ontario Mills Mall, and residential development in San Bernardino has caused increased congestion on both the 1-15 and 1-10, and more recently the El Ntno effects on roads In San Diego have furthered congestion and circulation problerr~ throughout the region for those commuters that travel between and within San Diego and Riverside counties. Within the Riverside County area, residential and indust~el developments in Yucalpa, Beaumont, Cherry Valley, and Calirrmsa,aiong with new developments prolxmed and approved in the San Tirnoteo Canyon area (e.g, "Oak Valley" Specific Plan and Phase 1) and to the west of Redlands arid Lama Unda, will increase traffic congestion of the 1-10 Freeway and its a~tedes. It appears that the San Timefag Canyon tRoad will be significantly impacted and consequently will require upgrades of traffic infrastructure along its entire length toward Barton Road and 1-10 at its northwest juncture. Cammurat ADTs on Rt.30, 1-10, and I-t5 are much greeter than revealed In the EIR when the Foottd/t C/f/es approved and proposed projects, from Cucamonga to Beeumont, are at full build out. These effects were not previously addressed or rnltigated for in the CEOA documents,. New legislative and statutory requirements under the Katz Congestion Management Act (CMA) requires the lead agency (City) to adequately address regional transportation issues and for projects to be evaluated with respect to the SCAG Regional Transportation Program, incorporating the most recent SCAG data. It would be prudent for the City to comply with the requirements of the CMA and CEQA to ensure that the EIR is legally defensible. There are changes in the baseline demographics of the region and in baseline estimates that demand a resvaluation of the project and the total ramifications (cumulative impacts). The City, in considering cumulative impacts to air quality, water qusr~ty/hydmlogy, traffic. biological and cultural resources should identify those tentire tracts and proposed projects within the City end regk)n~/oreg/on. Cumulative Impacts The Sage Coundl has compiled a list of locally approved or proposed projects that are known to, or may, effect the remaining RAFSS and other Senfive Habitats or Biota within the City and County. The referenced EIR documents Register failed to p~-ovide an adequate cummulative impacts analysis fo~ biological resguinea, including RAFSS. Therefore, the Ctty is required to reconsider the cumulative impacts analysis and proposed mitigation methods in light of new significant information presented by the Sage Council in this letter, including References. The Sage Council believes that the following data supports our claims that City has not been upholding the "public trust' or implementing adequate conservation measures to pried Callfomia's natural and cultural heritage. Cultural Resguinea Chief Ya'anna, Vera Rocha, of the Shoshone Gabrioting Nation, and Spirit of the Sage Courtall requests to meet with the appropriate agenc~ representatives and project proponents after we have received a written response. The County, Project Proponent, and Service have failed to notify the Shoshone GabrieJno Nation of the proDosed project within their ancestral lerritory that is of cultural significance. The project proponent must take "oral" hisracy from Chief Ys'anna. Vers Rocha, in the cultural resources assessment that is required by CEQA, State Histodc Preservation Act, Native American Heritage Act, end other regulations intended to protect Native Americans and their culture. Including religion. The Service is aware of the need to consult with Chief Ya'anna of the Gabdolings, as the agency hosted a In-Service on this sut~ject matter in lg9~ with Catfomia Indian Legal Services and the Sage Council. Chief Ya'anna Is the State recognized Most Ukely Descendant of the Shoshone "Gabriotings." ConsuP, etlon with the State recognized Tribes and Most Likely Descendant (MLD) in regards to cultural resources (registered or eligible archeotogical sites, ethnobotanlcal resources, prehistoric village site, burial grounds and sacred stte~). The City should require an independent consultant experienced with local tribal matters, archeology, anthropology and ethnobotany to prepare an extensive survey and study, including ~ histgo/of the MLD, to errsure that Important cultural resources are not disturbed, destroyed or removed from the project site inappropriately, The State Historic Preservation Officer must also be consulted and given an opportunity to comment on the Droject EIR. The Sage Council recommends that the City request that all elected tribal representatives, elders, and MLDs identify themselves by showing their individual papers of recogn~on with verified roll numbers and bkx)d decrees from the U.S, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs. The tribal representative and MLD should be more than 1/4 City of Rancho Cucamenga/Mayor & ~ Council Page Eighl "Luiseno" and/or 1/4 "Gabdelino." Native American Organizations, such as the Inland Empire Native American Commission, do not have the legal authority to select a tribal representetNa or speak on bshatf of an effected California Tribe or Band. Non~proftt organizations and comrni~sions may provide advise. However, Spirit of the Sage Council is a non-profit conservation project that was co-founded by Chief Ye'Anna Vera Rocha, the State Recognized MLD for the Shoehone "Gabde#nos." Therefore. lhe City may relay upon ttte Sage Councirs comments and objectlofts as those voiced In agreement by the "Gebriellno" MLD. The City and project proponent must comply with the State Native American HerEage Act (NAI-~A), Histodc Preservation Act, Antiquities Act, American Indian Rer~ious Freedom ACt, Graves and Repatriation ACt, and other applicable Cedee, Regulations and Executive Orders that protect cultural resources and the dghts of indigenous peop~ or minortries. The County completely failed to consult with the appropriate GabHelino MLD, Chief Ya'Anna, Vera Rocha, did not take an "oral history" of the subject lands, did not adequately circulate the Project EIR for review and comment, did no{ provide an adequate cultural resources assessment or mitigation and monitoring of impacts. Therefore, the City as a repor~bte agency must take appropriate COlTactive actio13s by preparing a subsequent EIR to provide en accurate Cullural Resources a~sessment (surveys and studies) and mitigation. Significant Data Not Previously Considered or Changed Circumstances The Sage Council betlaves that there is significant data not previously considered and/or substantial "changed circumstances' requinng a second look;, EIR addendum or subsequent EIR, pursuant Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Such substantial changes in the environment, demographics. traffic, cultural resources, water etc. were not adequately addressed in the Dralt and Final EIR or the Mitigation and Monlto~ng Plan. The C.~ty, County, CDFG and FWS are "responsible" permitting agencies that have the authori~ to Is~ue an estoppel on the Edison Project and deny the proposed General Plan amendments. It is our understanding that ff the City refuses to require the project apptment/Edison to prepare and circulate a subsequent EIR, then the Count,/and/or CDFG must prepare and submit the CEQA document according to CEQA Guidelines Section 150~(e)... "If a Respor~sible Agency believes that the final EIR or Negative Declaration prepa~'ed by the Lead Agency is not adequate for use by the Responsible Agency, the Responsible Agency must either: ... (3) Prepare a subsequent EIR if permissible under Section 15162" Since Section 1,5162 (substantial changes in circumstances) requires a new CEQA document, then Section 15096(e)(3) provides authority for CDFG, as the Responsible Agency to prepare this document. It ~s no{ clear whether CDFG can pass along the costs of document preparation and circulation on to the City and/or Developer. Howevec Section 15162(c) provides: "if the project was approved pn'or to the occurrence of the conditions described in subsection (a), the subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration shall be prepared by the pubitc agency which grants the next discretionary approval for the project." (emphesi~ eddea'). Therefore, if County, CDFG, or FWS is the !~blic agency granting the next discretionary approval for the project, then CDFG may be required to prepare the appropriate CEQA document if in its opinion, the existing CEQA document is inadequate. However, the City and City Afromay should note that the project was not approved !)rior to the occurance of the new conditions or data. The Sage Council contends that the City has the responslbillty and opportunity to require the project proponent to prepare a subsequent EIR to fulfilt its agency duties to conserve natural resources held in public bust, or to protect the rural erwlronment and open space for the Citizens. Whether the City and County must undergo CDFG consultation for CESA take authorizations (Fish and Game Code Section 2081) end Streambed Alteration Agreements (Fish and Game Code Section 1603) after local Project and General Plan amendments appears questionable 13roceduraity It would make logical sense that such consultation would ~- q ~4/15/1998 16:55 ~267449_31 ESA NETWORK PAGE 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga/Mayor & Clt~ Council Page Nine occur ptfor to local ix'oject approval and adoption of documents. Therefore, Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, pursuant AB 3180, would be considered adequate by a// responsible public agencies. A similar process must take place between the City, County, COFG and FWS to comply with the sec~on 4(d) Special RuIe/NCCP, Sectiort 10(a)/HCP, arid Section 7 respectfully. Trte Sage Council contends that CEQA does not let the local responsible agency "off the hook" for their failure to require e subsequent or atomended EIR. Perhaps more importantly to the public or public trust natural resource~ and lands, CEQA distributes the responsibility of compliance between all re~pons/b/e pubic trust agencies (local, state, and federal) to ensure envimnrnelltal protection. Hence, the Sage Council may bring legal action against ell responsible agencies for their failure to ensure the conservation of listed and unlisted species of concern that are rare, threatened, or endangered, including their essential habitat. (see also ~mlth v_,.County of Santa Barbara, 7 Cal. AI~. 4th 770) General Plan Amendment The City's approval and adoption of the FEIR and General Plan amendments Is not in cornDliance with all of the requirements of Government Code Section e5452 generally, but more spec~calty Sec. 65452(c). In addition, such adoption and approvals, through Resolutloft end Ordinances or otherwise, are not consistent with Governmane Code Section 65457 because there are "substantial changes tn the circumatanoes under which the project is being undertaken, end new available information." The Sage Council also believes that there may be procedural violations of Government Code Section 65450 where the City is amending the General Plan to be consistent wffh the Project, rather than requiring amendments to the Project a to ensure consistency with the City's current General Plan. Is the City going to amend the General Plan everytime a new project or project exparmion is proposed? Or is preferential treatment and expedited service being given to Edison? Range of Altemati~ls & Environmentally Superior Alternative The FEIR fails to provide a full range of Altematives, Environmentally Superior Alternative, or an analysis that may substantuate Edison's and the City's conclusions. The cumulative and collateral effects on the environment should also have been addressed in the FEIR documents In order to adequately mitigate adverse impacts. The City should not rely upon an adoption of 'Overriding Circumstances" without an adequate analysis or range of alternatives to the project, or all the surveys and studies performed pt/or to approving the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. The City has not required Edison to lessen significant and curr~lative impacts through a project redesign or other appropriate measures that might have been included with a full range of project AItemnatives as an acceptable "Environmentally Superior" alternative. The City has also failed to assess the ;~ssible costs associated with future mitigation requirements for project effects on listed species and impacts to habitat in relation to acquisition of lands that are 'vested" versa unvested. While the Sage Council could st~oport a No Proiect sitemauve, we would prefer to have the choice of an "Environmentally Superior ARemaUve" to the proposed project effects4 The City should prepare a "Resource Conservation Management Plan" (e_g. City of Rancho-Cucamonga RMP) to exp/ore acquisition of the project site or Re- zorfing to protect public trust natural resources. Thus, the proposed project would be required to comply with the City's adopted RMP, CDFG end USFWS NCCP Conservation and Process Guidelines, and other applicable State and federal regulations. tt is our understanding that the Presidents Budget for Interior includes funding for endangered species habitat acquisition. The acquisition of RAFSS habitat is a high priority within the FWS and CDFG. Therefore, in situ conservation of the remaining habitat area on the p~oject site could most likely occur through coordinated agerr,,-'y actions. We strongly encourage the City to take such positive leadership steps to uphold the public trust. Mitigation of Impacts & Mitigation Monitoring Plan (AB 3160) We remind the City that the creation of environmental documents and surveys do not provide for m'~Tet/on of adverse environmarital impacts, but ale to be used to substantuate conclusions that the proposed ruination measures are adequate. The City should require a subsequent EIR, including acceptable mitigation of the projects effects on the listed species and "threatened" habitat impacts (amended Mitigation and Monitoring Plan) that is scientificairy defensible and a~oproved by CDFG and FWS experts, thus legally defensible. Of course, the costs of cremation and distribution of the subsequent EIR should be home by Edison. In conclusion. while the following issues and concerns were raised during the public comment period on the draft EIR it would appear that they were not adequately addressed or resolved In the FEIR. City of Rancho Cucamonga/Mayor & City Council Page Ten N~w Listing & Relevant Scientific DMa Not Previously ConsMered The emergency listing of the San Bernardino kangaroo-rat (SBKR) was not addressed in the draft and FEIR. Thus, significant new scientific information and data wa~ not considered or addressed, in violation of CEQA ar~l the ESA, In addition, it appears that small mamammal trappings were no~ adequately performed utilizing the best scientiftc rnsthed~ available, and such information was not made available for public review and comment. Therefore, a Subsequent EiR is required. In closing, the Sage Council once again requests that the City Council reconsider the referenced t3ropesale and CEQA documents for the public benefit, and to insure regulatory compliance. Natures ecology is best for the local ecomom/ (Costanza, R., and C. Folks, 1994). Please enter this letter into the C~y's administrative record for this project arid proposed Gerleral Plan amendmerits. Please include the Sage Council on your mailing and distribution listed for this project or project area, and o~hers, in your City and County jurisdictions that may effect RAFFS and sensitive species. We would appreciate the 0Pl)ortunlty to review and comment on pmjecls that effect public trust natural resources and lands, In a timely manner. Because Sage Council provides a public benefit service and receNes a non-p~fit organization (project) tax axeminion, we request met the ~ and County provide such environmental documents wfthout charge. Thank you. The Sage Council looks forward to resolve of the publics concema. if you have any questions, please call me directly at (909) 42~-1637 or (626) 744-993;). For the wild Earth, Leeona Klippstein, Co-founder Conservation Programs Director Spidt of the Sage Council Attachments - Literature References and Documents cc: Thomas Mau~iello, Esq, State of Calffomin - The ReSources Agency DEPARTMENT--"' OF FISH http://www. dfg.ca.gov Eastm~ b'terra - In~nd ~ R~i~ 330 ~id~ Sh~, Sure 50 Long ~, ~t~m~ ~802 (~2) 5~5113 April 2, 1998 'PET~, W1LSON, ~Sover~-~or Mr. Brad Buffer City of Rancho Cucarnonga Planning Department 1500 Civic Center Ddve Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Dear Mr. Brad Buller: Project Planning for Sermitive Habitat~ in the City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County The Department of Fish and Game (Department) is writing to follow up on biological resource issues raised at our recent meeting with your office. As you are aware, the Department, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and others, are very concerned about continued losses of sensitive habitats tocated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and neighboring areas. Habitats of particular concern include Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, (state-ranked S1.1 rated, very threatened natural community), Alluvial Chaparral, Riversidean Coastal Sage Scrub (state-ranked S2.1, very threatened), and vadous ripadan communities. Conversion of ruderal grasslands and areas of past agricultural use to urban uses is also a concem. These habitats support an array of sens'rUve plant and animal species. Federally listed animals known to occupy these areas include the threatened Califomia gnatcatcher (federally listed on 3/30/93), endangered San Bernardino Merriam's kangaroo rat (emergency listed on 01/27/98), and endangered least fieIfs vireo (federally listed 5/2/86; state listed 10/2/80). As many as twenty-five sensitive species of plants and animals, may occur in these habitats. Sens'~ve rodent and reptile species also occur in ruderal grassland and agricultural areas, and these sites are important foraging and nesting areas for numerous raptom and rare species of bats. Where dparian and aquatic habitats are found sensitive/listed species of dpadan birds and amphibians may be present. 04/15/1998 15:55 6267449931 ESA NETWORK PAGE i3 Mr. Brad Buller April 2, 1998 Page Two These listed and/or sensitive species generally meet the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) definitions of rare and endangered species. CEQA Guidelines, § 15380 requires that impacts to these species be addressed in an environmental document and significant impacts to them be mitigated. Further, where a project may have a significant impact on such species and habitats by reducing their numbers or range, CEQA Guidelines, § 15065 Mandatory Finding of Significance requires preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Department is very concerned about continued, unmitigated losses of these habitats and sensitNe species populations. We are particularly concerned about projects going fortyard without current biological surveys and adequate CEQA compliance. On several recent occasions, projects that have been dormant for a number of years are now going forward utilizing old CEQA documentation, including Negative Declarations. Generally, reliance upon the use of environmental approvals more than five years old raise serious questions regarding their adequacy and compliance with CEQA requirements. It is important to note that biological survey information is generally only valid for a three year pedod at the maximum. Changes in habitat conditions, site use, and species listing status are common. Additionally, several large preserves in the North Etiwanda area have been established over the last few years, and protection of habitat connectivity and wildlife movement between these areas is currently a crffical planning Issue. The Department often finds that these older environmental documents do not adequately address current biological resource concerns and fail to address cumulative impacts to these resources. For approved projects more than three years old, the Department advises the City of Rancho Cucamonga that substantial changes have occurred with respect to biological resource values in many of the undeveloped portions of the City's sphere. CEQA Guidelines, §15162 directs that the lead agency shall prepare a subsequent environmental document, where new information of substantial importance comes to light that indicates: a) one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration could occur;, b) substantially impacts are more severe than previously shown; or c) mitig~ion measures or alternatives different from those previously analyzed would substantially r~luce impacts. These changed conditions also create additional CEQA compliance responsibilities for the Departr~ ant. CEQA Guidelines, §15381 states that ~...the term "responsible agency" includeS all public agencies other than the lead agency which have discretionary approval power over the project." The Department, therefore, is a responsible agency where a project requires issuance of a Streambed Alteration Agreement (Fish and Game Code §1603) or a California Endangered Species Act 04/15/1998 16:55 62674~9~31 ESA NETWORK PAGE Mr. Brad Buller April 2, 1998 Page Three Permit (Fish and Game Code § 2081). Consequently, the Department may be required, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15096(e), to prepare a subsequent environmental document where the Lead Agency does not preepare one. it is important to note that the City of Rancho Cucamo~ga is, signatory to the Memorandum of Understanding for development of the San Bernardino Valley-wide Multispecies Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Unfortunately, progress toward development of this plan has been slow. This planning effort provides for interim review of projects and requires evaluation of cumulative impacts to species and their habitats. The recent need for emergency listing of the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service occurred, in part, due to continued habitat loss and a number of CEQA projects which are imminently close to approval and do not currently have adequate project mitigation. If the MSHCP effort is to be successful, and if we are to avoid the need for future species listings, it is critical that we have sufficient flexibility to develop a meaningful conservation strategy and effective reserve system. As piecemeal development projects eliminate more habitat and remaining areas are fragmented, it may become difficult to achieve this goat, therefore, we ask for your support in implementing the afore-mentioned measures for projects that are more than three years old. The Department is available to work with the City to ensure that projects comply with CEQA, CESA and Fish and Game Code § 1603 and to develop appropriate mitigation for any impacts to the biological resources. We are also available to assist in ensuring that any issues pertaining to the older proposed projects are incorporated into the MSHCP effort where appropriate. The Department recommends that the City contact us to set up a meeting as action resumes on the older projects. We request that you provide us with a few weeks notice so as to coordinate the appropriate Department staff that needs to participate in the meeting. The Department appreciates the effort the City has shown in looking at interim project planning issues. Your support in moving ahead on the valley-wide MSHCP is important. Should you have any questions please direct them to Ms. Mary Meyer, Plant Ecologist at (805) 640-8019; Mr. Raal Rodriguez, Fishery Biologist at (909) 597-9823, or Mr. Liam Davis, Natural Communities Conservation Planning at (760) 467-4207. copy: see attached list Glenn Black, Supervisor Natural Heritage 16:55 S267449931 ~A NETWORK PAGE Mr. Brad Bttlter April 2, 1998 Page Four copy: Department of Fish and Game Mr. Glenn Black Mr. William Tippets Ms. Mary Meyer Mr. Raf~l Rodriguez Mr. Liam Davis U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad, California Mr. Jeff Newman Mr. Scott Ellason Ms. Ma~/Beth Woulfe California Regional Water Quality Control Board Riverside, Califomia Mr. Randy Scott, Planning Manager, County of San Bernardino 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino CA 92415-0182 City of Rsncho Cucamonga/Mayor & City Council Page Thir~l~een Keeley, JE., and S.C. Kaeley. 1984.- Postfire recovery of California coastal sage scrub. American Midland Naturalist 111 't05-117. Keeley, J,E., at. &l. 1185,- Role of allelopatfiY, heat and charred wood in the germination of chal~rral herbs suffrute~er~f~ Journal of Ecotogy 73:445-458. Keelay, J.E. 1~gl.- Seed germination and life history syndromes in the California chaparral. Botanical Review 57.51- 116~ Keeley at. el. 199S.- Overview of Management Issues Raised by the 1993 Wildtires in $outllsrn C.,sllfornla, 5rushfife~ in California: Ennk3gy and Resource Mana;lement. international Association of Wildland Fire, 1995, Keeley and $gett, 1~. - Preface. Brushfires in California: Ecology and Resource Management, International A~eoci~tion of VUilrlland Fire, 1995. Kelly, P.A, and J.T., Ratanberry, 1~a3. - Buffer zones lot ecological reserves in California: replacing guesswork with science. pp. 8S-93 In J F_.. Keeley 0aK]), Interface between ecology end land development in California. Southern C~lifomie Academy of Sciences, Lea Angeles. Kirkpatrick, J. an& C. Htltehinsan. Ig17- The Communitv Compo~ition of California Coastal Sage Scrub, Vegetation 35:21-33 Kir~Hck, J. end C. Hutchinson. ¶~B0 - The Environmental Relationships of Californian coastal sage scrub and some of its component commun[tie~ and species. Journal of Biogeography 7:23-28 Kleinetak, J., R. Ol~on, C, Em~rf. an, and J. Jones. 197~ - Land Use Conflicts with Natural Vegetation in the United Statat. Environmental Conservation: 6: 191-199. Kernetak, E.V., t~- Fire end ~nimat behavior. Proceedin0~ of the Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference 9:161-207. Kotlier, N.B., and J,A. Wiens, 1990 - Multiple scales of petchines~ end patch structure: a hiererchlal framework for the study of hefi:rogeneity. Otko~ $1~.253-60. Lean an{I Verbose 1~90 - Effects of pool size and isolation on amphi13isn communities. Biological Conservation 54 ;251-2~2, La Palls lind Barrett 1~93 - Effects of corridor width and presence on the population (tynemica of the meadow vole, Lencisc~pe Ecology 8:2S-37. Lawrence, G.E., 19~6- Ecology of vertebrate animals in relation to chaparral fire in the Sierra Nevada foothills. Ecology 47:278-291. Leopold, A. 1!31 - Game management. Scriber, New York. Maddeal( a~td lehubeg, 19~)6 -' The Fund Fnr Animals, Inc., comment letter of 6117/96, on behalf of the BIgMIvIr~y Legal Foundation, the Spirit of the Sage Council, and People for the EtlliCal Treatment of Animals, in rogerd~ to the FW$ Federal Regi~t~.r Nnfic. a. 61 FR 19308, May 1, 1996, for Revision of NEPA Procedures. Mann, Charles C. at. el., June 2~, tt113 -The High Cost of Biodiversity. Science vol. 2~3 p. 18~-1871. Maynard, Glyde, 1~:31 -A History of the D~,ve. lrtprnent of San AliSahie CanYon California. Historical Socieb/of Pomona Valley. January 19~5, Vol. 1 - Number 1. M©Graw~ J.B. ¶9Ill. - Experimental ecology of Drv;~.~ nctonetela ecotYDes: relattv$ response to competitors. New Phytologlat 100:233-241. M=Graw, J.B, lealb. Experimental ecology of Drvas_nctnpatata etatypes III. Environmental factors and plant growth. A;ctJc and Alpine Research 17:229-239. McGraw, J.B. end J. Antenavies. 1S1~ - Experimental et-.nlngy nf Dryes ;)cteoetala ecotyOel. I. Ecotypic differentiation end life-cycle stagel of selection. J. Ecology 71:879-897. Mlffe, Gary, t994, !l~? Principles of Conservation Biology, Sinsuet Associatel, Mafia, Gary, el. el., July 33, t~ - Scientific community group letter, to Senator John Chafes and Congressman Jam~ Sexton, Re; Reauthorizltion of the Endangered Speci~ Act, including strong ol3r)osifion to the "No Surprises" policy. On file with FWS Heedquaters. Mafia, {3cry, 34 June, ~? - Comment isfier on 6"2 FR 103, the Serviee,~ jnint proDosed "No Surprises" rule, including resubmisllon of 7/23/97 group scientific sign-on letter. Miller and Jestrow t1~ - The appli(,-ation of VA mycorrhizae to ~r.n~y.~tem rwatoretion and re(;ismation pp. 438-4~7. In M.F. Allen (ed), Mycorrllizel functioning, an integratire plant fungel process, Chapman & Hilt, New Yort<. Mills and Kummerow t~ - Herbivores, seed pradators, and chaparral succession, PP. 49-55. In S.C.KeslIy (ed), The California ~,---happaral:paradlgrm~ revletf~l Natural History Museum of Lo~ Angeles County, Los AngeleS, Science Sodas No. 34. Mortlion, M., at. &l., t~11~ Wildlife-habitat relafion~hil'~' c~3ncepts and a13Dticafiona. The University of City of Rancho Cucamonga/!Vlayor & City Council Page Fourteen Morton, D.M., 194g - Distribution and frequency of storm generated soil slips o~ 13urned and unl.~umed slopes, San Tirnoteo Badeands, Southern California, pp.27g-284. In D.M. Morton and P.M. Sacleer (ed~), Lancl~lides in a semi-add environment. Publications of the Inland Geological Society 2. Natural Re~e*:r~,'es Defense Counsel et,.al.. v. ~lJ~.~ U.S. Distr~ct (gth Cir.) California (1997). Pertlirling to the need to provide a recover/plan for the coastal California gnatcatcher. Nose, Reed F., 15~1a. - From Endangered Species To Biodiversity. From Balancing on the Bdnk of Extinction, The Endangered Species Act & Leesons for the Future. Edited by Kathryn Kobe. island Press. No~, R. 1~tb. - Laddscape Connectivity; Different Functions at Different Scales, Chapt.2 p.27-39, LandscaPe Linkages and BIodiversity, Island Press. Nose, !~,F, 1#2 - Edge Effect, roads, and conneotivity. Unpubl. clraff sections, in Scientific Review Panel Conservation Guidelines add Documentation, August 1993. On file with FWS Carisbed Field Office, CA. O'Leary, J. 11~0 - Californian Coastal Sage Scrub: General Characte~stic~ and Conllderations for Biological Conservation. Pages 24-41 in "Endangered Plant Communities of Southern California", A. Scfioenherr (ed,). Southern Callfoals Botanists Special Publication Number 3. Potts, EIcI( t~6 - Humanity's Descent, The Consequences of Ecological Instability, Chapt. IV pp. 224 - 254, A New View of Nature, Chapt. V 13P. 255 -279, The I,.i~nus Test. Pyne, 8.J. 15t4 - Introduction to wildland fire. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Read, E.A., M. Blaine, and P. Bowler, 1~6 - Restoration of coastal sage scrub. Society for Ecological Restoration, California Chapter, "Ecssla' vol. 6, issue 2. Re~<[tn~ A--Ii~M R, ral EXtinction (RAR!:] v. U.S. Army Corn of Eltoin#rs at. Ray, E. 1#4 - Status and ~on#rvation 'of the Endangered Slander-horned Spineflower and Alluvial Scrub Habitat in Southern California (Unp~Jbllahed Report), On f/~ w/th FWS Cartsbed F/e/d Of Wee Ryen and Nests 1918 - Evaluating prescribed fires, pp. 230-238. In J.E. Lotan, B.M. Ktlgore, W.C. Fischer, and R.W. Mutch (ads), Proceeding Symposium and work~t~op or~ w~lderness fire. USDA Forest Service, Missoule, MT., Nov. 15-18, 1983. Save Our $1)rinas, eL el, v,?-bbitt, MO-96-CA-168, U.S. District Court For the Western D~dct of Texas Midland-Odessa Division, or H.R. Rap. NO. 1825, 95th, or Cong., 2d Sees. 13, reprinted in 1978, U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 945, 9483. "[i}ndivldulls charged with the administration of the Act do not have the legal authority to weight the political importance of an endangered speci#." San Bernardino Valley Water Con#~vation DietHer's ($BVWCD) Master Plan, November 1tll - draft EIR add appendices, prepared by Vail Speck Associates. On file with FW$ Carlsbad t=leld Office_ Saunders, D.A., at. el, 111~1- Biological corteequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Siological Cormsrye§of1 5:18-32. Sauvajot, R. 1~8, - Conservation Science in Fire-Prone Natural Areas. Bruthfiras in California: Ecology and Resource Management. Intematiortal As$ociatton of Wildland Fire, 1995. Savage, J,C,, at. mi. lg78 - Earth movements from geodesic measurements pp. 175-186. In G.E!. Oakshott (ed), San Fernando, California, earthquake of g February 1971. California Division of Mines ar~l Geology Eiullefin 196. 8¢hoetter~ T.W. 1~74- Resource plrUtioning In e~ological communities. Science 185:27-39. $cheenherr, A.A., 1~0 - (ads), Endangered plant communities of southern California. Southern California Botaniatl, Fullerton. Special Publication No. 3. $chonewald-Cox and Bayleas, 15~I - The boundary model: a geographic analysis of design and conservation of nature reserves. Biological Con#rvation 38:305-322. Scott, T., lg~8 - Profire Management Along Califomia's Wildland/Urban Interface:introduction and Session Overview. Brush§res in California: Ecology and Resoume Management. International Association of Wildland Fire, 1995. a-,.ttle Audubon v. Thomas, Re: deftnitatlon of "recovery" of endangered sPecies Shilling~ Frazier, Jane 13, t~?. - Do Habitat Conservation Plans Protect Endangered Species?, Science, vol. 276, p.1~2-1663, Policy Forum. Smallwood 1~4 - Site invasibility by exotic birds and mammals. Biological Conservation 69:251-259. Smallwood 1g~8 - Scaling Swainson'l hawk population density for assessing habitat-uss across an agricultural lands, ape. J. Raptor Resarch 29:172-178. Smallwood and $chonewald 1~ - So, sling populatlo~ density end spatial pattern for terrestrial, mammalian camivores. Oecoiogla 107:588-94. Cid/of Rancho Cuoamonga/Mayor & G~Y council Page Sixteen Spirit of the ~ga Council, ~pt~nber 1ll, lg~? - ~E: FOtA r~u~t tu Gall Ko~fich, U~F~, in oonne~on ~h the "Te~ a~ Cond~o~" of the se~on 4(d) s~ m~ for the c~al CaE~rnia g~atoatc~r. On fi~ ~h USFWS, Cerb~ Fle~ Offi~, ~. S~irit of ~e Sage Council, O~o~r ~1, 1~7 - RE: Sage Cou~il ~er to Ci~ ~hn~, ~F~ ex~ing ~nce~ a~ ~e ~on 4(d) s~al rule for the t~reaten~ C~Lal Cafifomia gnat~t~er. Spi~ of ~e ~ge Council, O~e~r ~, 1997 - RE: Sage Cau~l FOIA A~al of O~o~r 15, 1~7 FWS FOIA R~n~ of 8~e Coun~l FOIA r~u~, dat~ 1~7, 10116~7, 10t17~7, 10/19~7 a,d 10~97. in to HCP Fire Poiq and p~ur~, 1o FWS FOIA A~a~ Offi~r, W~l~on, D.C.. Spi~ of ~e ~ge Council, Ne~mber 7, t~T - RE: S~e ~uncfl FOIA Ap~al in conne~on ~h the 'Ter~ CondOm" Of ~e se~on 4(~ i~dal m~ for the threaten~ C~I California g~tcatcher, "Biannual 8pi~ of ~e ~ge Council, ~nua~ ~, 1~8 - Le~er to CaBromic State Sen~or Tom H~yden, a~ the Natreal R~ourc~ Com~, RE: Ca~mia Enae~er~ S~ A~ a~ the NCCP Pr~ram. 8oi~ of ~ ~Co,,neil v. Ceun~ of Ban ~ino et~ -I., Re: Behind Ci~ ~om MSHCP Sp~r, T.E., l~k.- Co~r~l~ ~rns on ~e u~n ~nge, Mount Taxi,is, Marin CouP, California., ~, Sp~ at. al. 1~.- ~ ~ ~nfial fol~ ~e 1~ so~em Ca~mia Fire ~, Geo~i~t $~eW of ~, A~ ~ P~m~ ~(2):~, Sp~ l~6,-Fim e~ ~ F~ Pote~al of ~nter Sto~. Br~hfir~ in CaKfomle: Ecol~ e~ R~our~ Man~e~- I~onal ~o~afion of ~la~ Fire, 1 8~. A.N., 1~t.- H~ ~n ~e e~ ~ ~nimiz~?, ~. 417~18, In D.A. Sau~em a~ R,J. Hob~ (~), The ro~ o~ ~rddom. Su~ Be~ a~ S~s, Chip~ng No~n, N~ So~ WaI~. 8~ of ~om~ Feb~ 6. 1~ - Medium, To: Raul R~uez, E~i~ 6, Ch~no Offi~, From: of F~h & GI~ (Nan~ M. Mu~ay, Staff CoupeS, Su~: CE~ Qu~on. ~is Me~ ~dr~ a si~lar CEQA i~ue in r~a~ to su~al chang~ ~mu~n~s in ~1~1 r~our~. S~ R~ou~s Agent, COFQ - N~P Co~ew~on a~ Pro~s Gu~e~, !ncl~i~ NCCP ~ iaen~i~ su~ t3.0 ~ San Bema~no Coun~lC~ St, John I~.- A $ae~fi~e B~s for A~n~n~nt of ~m~ Se~i~. Bmehfir~ in California: Eco~y R~ource Manaoe~. I~efn~onal ~afion of ~nd Fire, 1~. 8~ney, J.~. 1~,- R~n~ of v~on to fire, UnNem~ of Ca~omia Pu~fions in O~a~ 28:14~. Stehbine, O.L., Jr. 1~2 - Th, ga~c a~ach to pr~e~ of are a~ ende~c s~des. Madreno 6:241-272. Sunitram v. Mendelrio Tabor and Tlylor tt~ - A~r~afion, ~gmfio~ An~ ~plJlX~ ~Cha,~. N~ure ~5:415~21. Taylor and Tabor 1~T6 - A ~havloml ~el ~r t~ evolOion of s~al ~na~m. In: Andeach RM., Turner B,D,, Tl~or L.R. (~) Popul~on ~namim. BisSell S~enbfic PubNcafions. Ov~rd, pp. 1-28. T~r, Timothy M. al., 12 No~mber 1~3 - 6~ end Pr~c~ for Suc~ ~ ~e En~~ S~es A~: A L~k ~ Re~e~ Pla~. ~ VoL ~ p. Taxell end ~n t9~- FM~ of ~ Can~l VI~y California. U.S. Geo~i~l Suwey ~ter~u~N Pi~r 7~:~.08. Tumar t~ - ~n~a~ e~Y: the effe~ of ~ffern on p~, Annuel Revi~ of EcoI~ a~ $yMem~ ~ S~clal Rule for ~e coa~l hl~omia gnatcM~ and Biologiul Opinion ~, Berber 1, 1~7 - L~Ir to Colonel Tadahiko Oho, ACOE, RE: 8PLCO R B7 242 LS, San Sevaine S~e~l~ Groun~ ~ Mamh 1~ t~2 - L~er to Gu~r Jori Mi~aeb, Coun~ of ~an Berne~i~, RE: Nl~lal Scrub ~, Novemir S, 1~13 - Leaer to R~er B~g, ~ision Ad~nistrator, F~eral Highway Ad~n~tmfion, Cat~mia ~v~on, Ee; Fon~l O~eu~fion (t~9~F~), G~te Route 30 lm~ovemen~; ~r the 8a~ An= ~er WolN 6tar, L~ Creek Wmh. ~, Mlmh 8, 1~ - L~er to Steve ~;;ek~, Nu:tun Air For~ Ba~e, ~., Re ' Pa~al Reco~ of ~on (ROD) for the ~t~tl a~ Rede of NoVon Air For~ Base, San Bema~ino Count, ~rnia ~F~, ~v~r ~, 1~ - Lutt~: lu Patl'~le Wa~en, ~ Manager, ~r For~ Base Convemion ~eficy, NoVon ~r Force B~, CA a~ to t~ A~: Steve Daneke, Re: Informal Se~on 7 ConsuR~on the D~al a~ Reuse of No~olt Air For~ B~e, ~en Bernalrio Count, Californ~ (1~9~1-~) ~, Ma~h 31, 1~ - Le~er to Inter~t~ Pemo~ Re: A~i~ i~ the L~ Cr~k~a~n W~h area, San Bet;tardino Count, Cal~mie; imams to lil~ s~=i~; and ~e ~o~c M~us of the ~fion of woo~- City of Ranoho Cuc~rrmno~,fMeyc]r & City Cm~ncil Page Eighteen Wilcox 1~ - In situ c~rme~vetlon of genetic resources: determinants of minimum area r~uiremen~. Pag~ 1~30 in J.A, McNeeley and K.R. Mil~r, (~s.), N~i~al Pa~, consew~on and d~e~nt, Sm~sonian In--Ion Pr~. Wilcox and Mushy 1~ - ConsawaSh s~a~: the eff~ of flagmonition on e~fin~on. Amedcan Na~ra~ t26:87~7. Wilson, E,O., 1~t - BIo~em~, I~u~on. W~hin~on: National Ac~emy Press. w~ht, EJ., 1~31- ~e effe~ of high tem~mture on se~ geenation, ~urnal of For~ 29:67g~87. Yahnor 1~ - Cha~ in ~lfe ~mmun~es near ~. Cohesion Bio~y 2:333-339. ~r ~. M~I., 1~I~- V~fion oha~e In r~e to extreme ~ents: ~e effect of ~ sho~ into~el ~n ~r~ in Ca~rnia cha~al a~ ~tal sega scrub. E~ ~:80~18. Ze~r P.~ t~ Fi~ F~u~ in 8o~om CaUfomie ~hmb~n~: Biol~t~l E~ and Men~e~nt O~ons. Bmshfi~ in Ca~mia: E~I~ a~ R~ource Man~e~nt. International A~oda~on of ~MMnd Fire, City of Rancho CuosmongaVMayor & City Council Page Eleven REFERENCES Ahlbom, William O., 1M2 - Santa Ann River Basin Flood Hazard. San Bernardino County Museum Association Quarterly. Vol. XXIX, NO. 2, Winter 1982. Axel~'od, O. 11li18 - The Origin of Coastal Sage Vegetation, Alta and Baja Calfornia. American Journal of Botany 65 (10): 1117-1131, Bailey and Rice tN~- So~l slippage: an indicator of slope instability on chal~rral watersheds of southern Ca#foals. Barbour, M, and J. Major 15T/- Terrestrial Vegetation of California. John Wiley and Sons, New York. BaskIn, J.M. and C,C. B&$kin. lg?~ - Plant population differences in dormancy and gerrninafion characteristics of seeds: heredity or environment? American Midland Naturalist 90:493-498. Bent, A.¢, lt45 - Life Histories of North American thrushes, kinglets, and their allies. United States Natural Museum Bulletin. 196: 1-411. Bantly, J.R. and R.L. Fenner, lg~- Soil temperatures during burning related to postfire seedbede on woodland range. Journal of Forestry 56:737-740. Blake and K, in' 1557 - Breeding birds of isolated woodlots: area and habitat relationships. Ecology 6~: 1724-1734. Booker, el. el. 1li$ - The Oakland Hills Fire of 20 October 1991: An Evaluation of Post-Fire Response. In J.E, Keetey and T. Scott (ads), Brushfires In California: Ecology and Resource Management. International Aa~oci~on of Wildbnd Fire, 1995. I~rc#ert and Odion 1t~& Fire Intensity and Vegetation Recovery in Chaparral: A Review. In J.E Kaelay and T. Sectt (edl), Brushfires in California: Ecology and Resource Management. International Association of Wildland Fire, 1995. Bmdan, G, and 8. Love, lg96- Habitat Use Versus Availability for Coastal California Gnatcatcher in Western Riverside County Dultng the 1992-1994 Breeding Seasons. Paper DelNered at the Symposium on the Biology of the Califomil Gnatcatcher held 15-16 September, 1995, Univer~Ry of California, Riverside. Bradart, Gerald, it. el., October 1.?. - Association Of Within-Territory Vegetation Characteristics And Fitness Components Of California Gnatcatchers. The Auk 114(4):801 - ~09, 1997. Burke, R.L, 1~1, - Relocateone, repatriations, and translocations of amphibians and reptiles: taking a broader view. Heqaitologia 47(3):350-357. Campbell, K. el. el. 1~18. ~ Saving the habitat and losing the birds: adjacent habitats, management, and natural history of the California gnatcatcher. Paper Delivered at the Symposium on the Biology of the California Gnatcatcher held 15-16 September, 1995, University of California, Riverside. CDFG, April 1, 1~ - Laffer to City Council, CRy of Rancho Cucamonga, RE: Eftwanda North Spedtic Plan EIR, SCH 8912314 COFQ, April 22, ¶114 - Letter to Valerie Palmer, Director of Planning, Courffy of San Bernardino, RE: North Etiwanda Open Space and Habitat Preservation Program CDFG, Auguit 18, 1tt$ - Letter to George Rodriquez, Cucamonga County Water District, RE: Streambed Alteration Agreement 5-383-95 CDFG 199~ - letter to CRy of Rancho Cucamonga regarding Project Planning for Sensitive Habitats. Concerns expressed are telarNo to those before the Cityof Rialto. Carling, P.¢., it. el, IU2.- Small mammals, habitat components, and fire in southeastern Australia, pp. 199-206. In C.E. Conrad and W.C. Oechei (etas), Proceedings of the symposium on dynamics and management of the Mediterranean-type ecosystems. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report PAW-58. Chapin, F.$,, III. Ind B.C. Chapin, 1~1 - Ecotypic differentiation of growth processes in Carex aquatili$ along latitudinal and local gradients. Ecology 62:1000.11309, City of Ranshe Cueslongs "Quartoray Tentative Tact Status - October 11gl- December Chew, R.M., el. el. 1~I - The effects of the fire on the small mammal population of chaparral. Journal of Memmalngy 40:253, Chrtstenun, N.L. IN8 - Shrubland fire regimes and their evolutionary consequences, pp. 85-100. In S.T.A. Pickett and P.S. White (ads), The Ecology of natural cJsturbance. Academic Pre~, New York. Christensen, N.L, IN3- Fire regimes and ecosystem dynamics, pp. 233-244. In P.J. Crutzen and J.G. Goldhammer (ads), Fire in the environment: the ecological, atmospheric, and climatic importance of vegetation fires. John Wiley & Sons, New York. City of-Rancho Cucamonga/lVlayor & City Council Page Twelve Corian] at. el., 11t8 - Impacts of Posttim Grass Seeding on Chaparral 8yetams - What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Hare? Brushfires in California, Ecology and Rosource M~nagement. International A~so~iation of Wildland Fire, 1995. Costanza, R., and C. Folk- Ecological economics and suatainal:)la development. Prepared for the Intemationat Experts Meeting for the Operation of the Economics of Sustainability, Manila, Philippine~. Creddock, O.W. 192l - The successional influences of fire on the chaparral type. M.A. thesis, University of California, Berkeley. D'Antionle, ¢,M., and Vitousek, P,M., 111~2. Biological invasions by exotic gres~, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23;63--87. D°Antonlo, C.M, It. el. 1~3.- Invasion of madtime chaparral by the introduced succulent Carpobrotus edulis: the to/es of f/re end herb/vary. Oecologla 95: 14-21. den Boer~ P.J., 1191- On the survival of populations in a hatrogeneoua and vanbin environment. Oscologes 50:39-53. Fahselt, D,, IMI~ - The dangers of transplantation as a conservation technk:lue. Natural Areas Journal 8:238-244. Fielder, P,L., 1111 - Final Report, Mitigation-Related Transplantation, Rolocation And Reintroduction Project~ Involving Endangered And Threatened, And Rare Plant Species In California. Contract No. FG-8611, Submitted to Ann Howaid, California Department of Fish & Game. Foreman, R.T.?. 1~1 - Interaction among landscape elements: a core of landscape ecology. Pages 35-48 in Proosedlngs of the International Congress, Netherlands Society for Landscape Ecology, Veldhaven Pudoc, Wageningen. Qilpin, M.E. t~?, - Spatial structure and population vulnerability, In: Viable Populations for Conservation. M.E. $oul~ (Ed,). Caml~tdge Pre~, New York, New York. pp. !25-140. Gibbana, Bo}M, 1~8, - Remarks on Podfire Seeding. In J.E, Keeley and T. Scott (ads), Brushfires in California: Ecology and Rosourca Management. International ANociafion of Wildland Fire, 1995. Ga~ieb, L.D. 1~/~ - Ganot~pic similarfly of la~ge and small indNiduals in a natural population of the annual plant $t~phanomerfa axigua ssp. coronaria. Jn. Ecol. 65:127-134. Gritg-Smtth 19~3. Quantitative plant ecology. University of Califomla Press, Berkeley, (~rtff#h, l, It. el., 1118, - Translocation es a Species Conservation Tool: $titu~ and Strategy. Science, Vol. 245, Articles, pp. 477 - 480. Grinnell, J. 11128 - Presence and absence of animals. Univemity of Callfames Chronicle 30:429-450. Grumbine, E.R. - Ghost Beers - Exploring the BiodNersity Crisis. leland Press. Hahski, I., lt~4 - Spatial scale, patchiness and population dynamics on land. Phil. Trans. R, Sac. Land. 343:1 9-25. I. iemhman, Virginia R,, 1~92 - The Story of Lytla Creek Canyon. Guthrie Publications, Lytle Creek, CA. Holland, Dan., April 28, 1197 - Re: Comment letter to USFW8 on 62 FR 60, p. 14938, Doc. 97-7908, in connection with the Notice of AvaiJability on the Final E!RJEIS for Issuance of Take Authorization for Ilsted species within the M$CP planning area in San Diego, CA.. Hailings, C.$. lift - Cross-scale morphology, geometry end dynamics of ecoly~teros. Ecological Monograptm. Hewatd, A,M,, 1~t3 - Finding effe(AJve approaches to endangered plant mitigation. In J,E. Keeley (ed.), Interface between ecok:~gy arid land development in California, Southern California Academy of S~iences, Los Angeles. Jackson, J. 1~]'- Comment letter to FWS and NMF$ on the proposed No Surprises rule. Jensen, Deborah, It. el., 11~3- In Our Own Hahall: A Strategy for Conserving Celifornia's Biological Diversity. University of Caifornie Press. Janzen, D.H., 1~6- The eternal external threat, pp. 286-303. In M. Soul~ (ed), Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and divemity. Slnauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Kin', J.R., ~9t4 - Lanclscapa,~ and management for ecological integrity. Pages 229-251 in K.C. KIm and R.D. Weaver (ads), Biodlvemity and lindacape: a paradox for humanity. Caml~rldge University Press, New York, Keeier-Wolf, ?., 1~3.- Department of Fish & Game draft document, list outlining responsibilities and actions taken on the southern Callfames fires of October - November 1993. Natural Heritage Division, $acremanto~ California. 10¢). Keeier-Wolf, 1'., 1~S - Post-Fire Emergency Seeding and Conservation in Southern California Shrublands. Brushfires m California: Ecology and Resource Management. International Association of Wildland Fire, Ksele¥, J.l[., 1~77.- ~eed production, seed populations in soil. and seeding production after fire for two congeneric pairs of aprouting and non-sprouting chaparral shrubs. Ecology 58:620-~29. Keeley, J.E., at. el. 19~,- Postfire su~on of the herbaceous flora in southern California chaparral. EcolOgy 82:1608-1621. City of Rancho Cucamonga/Mayor & City Council Page Seventeen USFW~, June E, 1~14 - Memorandum To: Ray Vizgirdes, Fred Roberta, From: James Bums, Consultation, Subject: SBKR in Lytle Creek. U~FW"8, O~;teber 1~}4 - Draft Fish and WlldNfe Coordination Act Report prepared lay the Carlsbad Field Office U~FW~, I~vember 1~, 11t4 - Letter to John Gill, ACOE, Re: Santa Aria River Groins, PN-94-O051-RS, Rtvemide County, California. USFWS, Der, ember 2t, 11~4 - Letter to Peter C. Markle, Acting Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, California Division, to the Attn: Jeff Lewis, Re: State Route 30 mitigation; Oak Summit Management Plan, San Bernardino County, california. USFW~, January 3, 1ttS - Letter to David B. Kessler, AICP, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, Re: Biologi~ai Ol~nlon on the San Bernardino Intemat~mat Airport ($BIA) Runway Improvements Project, San Bemardino County, Ca#fatale. (1-6.95-F.6) USFW~, February t, 11~ - Letter to Gordon Schanck, Dh'ector of Real Estate, University of Calffomia, Real Estate Services Groula, Re: Public UIa Sale of 176 acres, Etawanda, San Beman:!ino County, California (a.k.a. University Creel Development Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga) USFW$, li!&reh 2?, 1tI~. Letter to Thorm~ $hrader, Manager, Env, Compliance Group, Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Colondo Regional Office, Nevada, and to the Alan: Mike Walker, Re; Biological Opinion on the Sen Sevaina Creek Water Project, San Bernenaino, California. (1-6-94-F.10) U~FW~, $el~tember 8, ll~E - Re: EnvironmentIll A~sessment for the luuance of an Inci(lental Take Permit, under section 10(A)(1)(B) of the Etxtangarad Species Act for the Endangered Delhi Salxts Flower-Loving Fly, Colton Transmi~iort Une and $ul~tation Project by the City of Colton, Colton, California. July 1995. USFW"8, December 4~$, 1117 - Letter to City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division, RE; Edison Company Draft EIR USFVI~ Bleleglelll O!;)lalen for the Casino World Corporation, Big TuJunge Wash US I)el)arlntent ~f the Interior, Fish & Wildlife $ervice, March 10, 1~S - Letter from Gall Kobetich, USFWS Field Supervilor, to Larry Eng, NCCP Program Supervisor, Re: The paucity of scientific data for most #~wered" species cornplieetes the Service'8 evaluation of the Sen Diego MSCP. Or~ file with USFW$, Cadsbad Field Office, CA. US Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service, March 27, 11!$ - Letter from Gall Koberich, USFWS Field $upervlaor, to Larry Eng, NCCP Program Supervisor. On file with USFWS, Carlsbad Field Office, CA. On file with USFWS, Carlsbad Field Office, CA, U~ Deparlznent of the Interior, Fiah & Wildlife Service, February 8, 1~l~ - Letter I'rom FWS Acting Regional Directm (1), to FWS Director, Re: "Funding Nee~ for Habitat Conservation Plans in California in Fiscal Year 1997 and Beyoriel'. land acquisition in the City of San Diego MSCP subregion is expected to co~t between 5.2 and 9.2 miBon dol~rt per annum. US Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service, November 19, 1~l~ - USFWS Memorandum, RE: Effect of Recent Fir~ in Southern California on the Coastal California G~atcatcher and the NCCP Program. U~ Deparlment of thl !ateder, Fish & Wildlife Service, March 15, 1557 - USFWS Memo and Fax, from Regional Office to Carlsbad Field Office, 'Fish 8, Wildlife Service, History of NCCP Funding to Southern California Counties 1991.1996,' provided to the Saga Council in response to FOIA request, US Deparlz~tent of the laterlet, Office of the Secretary 1~J~7 - Response letter dated 12/9/97 to FOtA appeals 98-025, and 98-027, from Spirit of the Sega Council. Wait~rl, C., 118~- Adlld:Ne management of renewab~ resources. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York. Weilt, W.(~. 1111-The affec~ of fire on the generation of debris flows in southern California 13o. 105-114. Geological Society of America Review~ in Engineering Geology 7. Westhaan, W. INla. - Divertity Relations and Succession in California Coastal Sage Scrub. Ecology 62: 170-184. Westman, W. l~Slb. - Factors influencing the dtstrfbufion of species of California Coastal Sage Scrub. Ecology 62: 439-455. Weantan, W. I~17- implications of Ecological Theory for Rare Plant Conservation in Coastal Sage Scrub. Pages 133-149 in "Pmceedlnga of the Conference on Conservation and Management o! Rare and Endangered Plants", T. Ellis (ed.); California Native Plant Society, ~acramento. White at. el. 1~- Poetbum Monitoring of the Eegte Fire: First Year Recovery on Sites Seeded With Buckwheat and Coastal Sage. Brushfires in California: Ecology and Resource Management. International Attoclarion of Wildllnd Fire, 1995. City of Rancho Cucamonga/Mayor & City Council Page Fi~een Smallwood, 8., at. el,, unpublished July 26, 1997, and July 28, 1991 - "Science Missing In The No Surl:~ses Poicy" Rel:)or~ to USFWS and NMFS in response to 62 FR 105 Proposed Rule Federal Register, Vol. 62, No. 103, Thumday May 29, 1997, Propo~ed Rules, No Surprises Policy, and Federal Register, VoL 62, No. 113, Thursday June 12, 1997, Notices, Announcement of Dratt Safe Harbor Policy, and Propoecd Rule, Safe Hart)or Agreements and Candidate Conservation Agreements. Attachment - Scientific community group sign-on letter in opposition to the proposed amendments to the federal ESA and other regulations. ~mith v. County of ~.~ft~ ~ 7 Cal. App. 4th 770 8auld, Michael, Juno tS, 1~. - Comment latter to Senator John Chefee and Congressman James Sexton, Re: Discussion Draft of the Endangered Species Reauthorization Act of 1996, including NCCP program concerns end opl:X::~tion to the No Surl:)rises policy. Southweatom Field Biologlate and Clerk Engineering, July 1994 - Draft Environmental AssesmenS (EA) for the San Saveinc Water Project, Sen Bernardino County, CA. Spirit of the 8ago Council, September 6, 1998 - RE: Sial Council Comments to Brian Loew and Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statement (ELS) for proposed "long term' Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) and Incidental Take Permit for the 8taphans' kangaroo-rat (Dil:XX:tOmyS stephenS, Riverside County, California. On file with DOI/FWS end Carlsbad Field Office. Spirit of the Sago Council, April 11, lg64 - R:E: 60-Day Notice of intent to Sue, under the ESA, cubmiSted by Charles Stevens Crandall. On file with DOIIFWS end Carlsbad Field Office. Spirit of the 8ago Council, at, el, June 13, 1990 - RE: Sixty Day Notice of Intent To Sue on the Gnatcatcher 4(d) Special Rule and NCCP program for violations of the ESA. On file with DOI/FWS and Carlsbad Field Office. Spirit of the Sage Council, July 22, 1g~$ - RE'. FOiA request to Gall Koberich, USFWS, in connection with the "Terms and Conclltions" of the section 4(d) special rule for the coastal Ca#fames gnatcatcher. On file with DOI/FWS and Carlabad Field Office. Spirit of the Sage Council, September 7, 1694 - RE: Sage Council Comments on the gl4/96 Draft MSHCP Planning Agreement Outine,Varaion #34 from revisions made on 8/28/96, to County of Riverside MSHCP Negotiating Team c/o RCHCA. On file with DOtlFWS and Cartebad Field Office. Spirit of the &ago Council, September 18, 16~g - RE: Sage Council Comment~ on the 9/14/96 Draft MSHCP PblnnilxI Agreement Outline, Version #5 including revisions made on 9/4/96, to County of Riveaide c/o RCNCA Board and Aclvi$ory Committee. Spirit of the Sago Council, November 21, 19N - RE: Sage Council Comments on the 10/23196 Revised Draft MSHCP Planning Agreement, to Brian Loew, Executive Director, Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency, Sail Koberich, Field 8uparvleor, U.S, Fish & Wtldife Service. Spirit of the Sage Council, April 2S, t667- Re: Amended Comment letter, wtth attachments that include the Sage Councll"s gnatcatcher data base, to USFWS on 62 FR 80, p. 14938, Dec. 97-7908, in connection with the Notice of Availabilty on the Final EIR/EIS for lesuance of Take Authorization for fisted species within the MSCP planning area in San Diego, CA.. Spirit of the Sago Council, Juno 12, 19~1 - RE: Sage Council Comments on the San Bernardino Valley MuirJibe Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) contract and alleged violations of the stipulated 'good faith" agreement for entre-agency project review, to Pate Saranson, Asst. Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Bill 'rlppet~, Field Supervisor, CDFG NCCP Program, Valerie PIIrner, Planner, County of 8an Bernardino, Senator Tom Hayden, Chair, State Natural Resources Committee. On file with USFW6, Carlabed Fleld Office, CA. Spirit of the ~aga Council, June 17, 194/' ~ RE: Sage Council Comments on the Proposed Approval of the Weetam Riveraide County Multiple Species Hat)itat Conservation Planning Agreement, to Gall Koberich, Field Supewieor, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Bill Tippets, Field Supervisor, CDFG NCCP Program, RCHCA Board of Directors, County of Riverside, Brian Lone, Director, Eiverslde County Habitat Conservation Agency. On file with USFWS, Carlsbad Field Office, CA. SI)irit of the ~41ga Council, September 5, 1947 - RE: Sixty-Day Notice of Intent to Sue, Pueuant the ESA, to Gall Koberich, USFW~, Ran Rampie, CDFG NCCP, Randy Scott, Planning Department, County of San Bernardino, in connection with Regulatory Non.Compliance and Breach of Contract of the San Bernarclino Valley Multit~le Species Habitat Conservation Plan MOU. On file with USFWS, Carlsbad Field Office, CA. Spirit of the Sage Council, Saptadllber 11, 1661 - Eli: FOIA request to Jeff Newman, USFW~, in conne~on with the USFWS "Fire Policy" for HCP$ and NCCI:~. On file with USFWS, Carlsbad Field Office, CA. ~34,'15/1'398 i:~: 13 6267449'331 __.S~ NET~/JCA'F P~GE 89 EXISTING & PROPOSED THREATS TO THE SBKR and/or ALLUVIAL SAGE SCRUB HABITAT 1. TT 13527 MMcher 2. TT 14381 Watt 3. TT 14382 Watt 4. TT 13~64 Aidns Standard Pastfie 5. TT 13796 Lewis Homes 6. TT 13951 James Chou 7. TT 14055 Modern Corp. 8. TT 14120 Eftwanda Heights Der. 9. TT 14476 Modern Corp. 10. TT 14207 Juug Huang 11. TT 14263 EGM Development G&D Construeeisa 12. TT 14405 Walter Hu 13. TT 14459 La Chases Alpha S~rviee & Tech 14. TT 14475 SMmma I$. TT 14509 Bayous Corp. 16. TT 14555 Chang 17. TT 14875 Pltmssi-Dalmau 15. TT 15072 Lewis D~v. 19. TT 15477 Matreyek Homes 20. TT 1S485 H.R. Engineering Alex CabPal North of Wilson/West of Eftwanda North of Wilson/West of Eftwanda North of Wilson/West of Etiwanda Approved 9/28/88 Approved 9/26/90 Approved 9/26/90 N. of Summitt/East of Wardman BulLock Rd. Approved 11114190 " Approved 5/12/97 & 10/22/97 $. of Mountain Vlew/W of Terra Vista Pkwy 94 lot subdivision SFR $. of HillsJde/Ea.t of h~N. of M~zHim No~ of Ar~wlEast of hbr East of Etiw~No~h of Hi~d Chu~h/E~t of A~hibald W. of Be~u~ of He~e Par~li~n E. of Cu~mon~ C~W~u~ of Ba~e N, of San !~rnardlno RdJEast of Vineyard Ave. East of Arehibald/$outh of Lemon Ave. Approved 9/9/93 Approved' 8114/91 Approved 3127/98 Approved 6/26191 Submitted 10/29/97 Approved 5/22/91 Approved 10/25/89 Approved 1/13/92 Approved 12/9/92 Approved J/28/90 Aeeept~d I/S/98 N. of A!mond/W. of Sapphire (Cucamonp Canyon) Approved I 1/18/92 East of Hermosa/Wilson & B&nyan South of Vista Grove/E. of Hermosa SEe Archibald & Church SWC Ba.eline & Rochester NEe Ba,e Line i MIIIlk~n North of Highland/East of Day Creek Approved 4t22/92 Approved 10/13/97 Approved 1/9/91 Submitted 9/25/97 Approved 11/9/94 Accepted 2/4/9? 21. 22. 2J. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28, 29. 30, 31. 32. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. TT 15540 Fu Mat Ltd. TT 15577 Modern Corp. TT 15711 Diversified Pacific TT 1fi727 TT 15727 TT 15766 Diversified Pacific Griffin Indiatries Mark TayLor, Inc. TT 15783 G & D ContWuetion TT IS798 RBF Asseciat~s TT 15871 TT 15875 William Lyon Home, Lewta Homea/ADR We,t Cueamong, CreekJFoothtH & Arrow North of Arrow/East of Baker North of Foothill/Eftwanda & Ea,t Ave. 282 Io¢ subdivision SFR $4mth of Lemon/Welt of Hermorn West of Archibald/4,h & 6th Streets J41 lot subdivision s!rR North of Baseline/West of Victoria Pork Lane 264 units tondo/apartments E. of Cut.mens. Creek/S. of Baseline Rd. E. of East Ave./S, of HiKhiand Ave. 38 lot subdivision 8FR SWC Highland & Day Creek Blvt S. S/t of Highland/Ea,t of Day Creek Eftwanda North Specific Plan (SCH 8912314) TT 14771 Lauren Development TT 15797 CUP 84*08 Victoria Gardens Regional Shopping Center CUP 90-42 IJ Commercial Retail Bldg.. CUP 90-42 (Mod.) CUP 91-24 20 buffdingo/7 already completed CUP 97-05 Warehouse/Man uhcturing Bldg. CLI~ 97-13 Retail Shopping Center CUP 97-19 West of Day Creek at Deer Creek Wash currently in Utipttion for CEQA viointions NT- eorner of Kenyon Way/Woodruff Way 61 lot subdivision SIrR N. of Foothill B!vd/W. of l-IS Frwy SW corner of Day Creek Blvd/Foothfil Bird SW corner of Day Cmk Bird/Foothill B!vd SW corner of Foothill Blvd/Roehester Ave. Approved 6/23/93 Approved 12/9/93 Approved 8/14/96 Approved 6/12/96 Approved 11/20/96 Approved 11/20/96 Accepted 1115/96 Approved 7/23/9'Y Submitted 12/16/97 Submitted 12/23/97 Approved 1992 Approved 1997 Approved Approved 100-acres Approved 31.2-acres Proposed 3,fi23 sq. fl. Approved 27-acres NE eorner of Vineyard Ave/9th Street Approved 4.31 acres Southside of Foothill Blvd/Spruee & Elm Streets Proposed 1 t.7S acres NW corner of FoothaH Bird/Vineyard AvL Proposed 9.82 acres 40. CUP-32 Auto Nation N. of 4th Streef/w. of I-I$/E. of Buffalo Ave. Auto Sales Approved 20-acres 41. DR 96-34 10670 6th Street Warehou,e Addition Propo~d 9.2 acre. 42. DR 97-01 N. of Foothill Bivd/E. of Center Industrial Bldgs Approved 7.fi5 acres 43. DR 97-02 9076 Hyssop Manufacturing Bldg. Approved ,;-acres 44. B~by Specific Plan l~tween Milliken Ave/P#tsbnrll~h Ave/N. of 4th Approved 3S-acres BuaJnejs Park 45. General Dynamics Specific Plan Bet~veen 4th and 6th St./Utica Ave & Cleveland Approved 133-ocres Mixed Use -- Offices/Commercial/!ndustrial 46. Mission Land Use Amendment Between l~lffalo Ave. & Pittsburgh Ave, Commercial B!dlL Approved 61-acres 47. General Plan Amendment, 96.03B & 97-01 Victoria Communit~ Plan Amendments 96-01 & 97.01 Editon Company Draft EER ($CH 97071043) November II, 1997 Submiffed 1997 94.15 acres Universlay Crest E. Day Creek Wash/Below N. Etiwtmda Reserve Approved 176-acres Residential Development Project CITY OF FONTA.NA 49. Westgate Specific Plan N, of Baseline Rd/S. of Summitt Ave./E. of 1-!5 Approved 870-acres R¢sidental/Com marsial/Light Industrio] 50. Morntag,ida N. of Baseline Rd/E. of Cherry Ave. Approved 92,1-acres 51, West End Specific Plan Amendments 4,S,6 California Landings East Ave. on west/SP raft to northS. of Cherry Approved 1,296-aeres Residential/Commercial $E corner of Hemlock Ave./Highland Ave. ResMental Units Propo~d 20B-acre ~mmit Heights N. of Highland Ave./W. of Lytle Creek RdJ S. of Summit Ave./E. of San Sevaine 066 Realdental Units Proposed 3164cre Rancho Fentans Specific Plan !~tween Walnut St./l~lfiler Ave Proposed 435.~ acre Citrus Ave/Redwood Ave Mixed Use D~velopment - Residential/Commercial NETWORk; Humer~ 1~4t* Sierra Ridge CITY OF ONTARIO California Commerce Center Specific Plan (~*a~o ~s M~I) ~mr~ Alsoft Expansion 4Ol-S (C~-~) 60. 61. $006-$ Touy Rom's 62. 413~-S (CO$9-01) 4904-$ (CO96-01) 64. $005-S 60. $006-S 66. sosg-s 67. 5081-S .~J~T,Y~. OF HIGHLAND 68. Draft EIR (SCH 9S082014) $, of SB National Forest/N. of Summit Ave, & I-1~ w. of Rich Bash/E. of San ~evaine Creek 3 Phase Residential - Plmss i completed North of Foutana/E. of Hunters Ridge Residenthi/Golf Course Development Approved S67.6 N. of 1-10 Frwy/W, of 1-1S Fr~vylS. of 4th SL E. of Milliken Ave. Approved 270-acre Southside of Airport Drive/Vineyard Ave. Thre~ termhal nodes Approved 131 acres Approved 750,000 Eastside of Mercedes Lane/bland Empire Blvd. Approved 242,794 sq. ft, 2 4-story office buildings Porsche WaylEastslde of Hilton Hotel 3-story office building Approved 46~90 sq. fl. 3S$0 Porsche Way ~ Inland Empire Blvd. Approved 6,125 sq. h. Turner Ave./inland Empire Blvd. 18 Center Court Units Turner Ave./N. of Inland Empire Blvd. 10 unit Condo developmeM Approved South of Airport Drive/W. of Wineville Ave. Warshouse/Distribution Faefiity Approved SW comer of Dupont St./Alrport Drive Warehouse/Distribution Faoility Approved 21.67 acres SE corner Sbea Center Dr./WJneville Ave. 3 flit-up IJ~du,trlal Warehouse Bidg,. Approved 134,~04 sq. Approvzd 797,106 sq. ft. Airport DrJCommerce Prkwy/Doubleday Ave. Approved 416,000 sq, ft. Industrial Warehouse Santa Ann Wash Development Agreerecur Orang~ Street Quarry CUP and Reclamation Plan Alabama Street Reclamation Plan CITY OF COLTON 69. Colton Transmission L!ne slid Substation Project by the City of Colton, Colton, California- Proposed 310+ acres Approved 4.6 acres COUNT'/OFS~N BERNARDINO ~ S~vaine Creek Water Project 71. 72. 73. 74. ?6. 77. 79. TWS BJoloKIcal Opinion (i-6-9S-F-10) ACOE Application N. Bureau of Reclamation FONSI NO. LC-91~4 Approved S~mwe$t Materials/Santa Ann Wash Development Agrezment Ell/(SCH 9~082014) Submitted 1997 Cucamonga Coun .ty Water District CDFG Approved 8/18/9S Day Creek Water Project - CDFG 1601 Streambed Alteration AgrNment Notification NO. ~.383-9S North Etiwanda Open Space & Habitat Preservation Program (I 1 sq. mik plannbg area) Approved 1994 Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill !~xponslou E. of Sierras Ave./N. of Hi,bland Ave D~cllff Drive/N. Wardman Bullock Rd. NE side of future Day Creek Blvd. NE of 1-10 ~ Etiwandn lnterchang~ E. of Etiwanda Ave/N. of 8,m Ikruardlno Proposed/Draft EIR ?IS-acres Proposed 41.4 acres Proposed 1,200 SFU Proposed 75.7 acres Approved 42.7 acres Lin$ Yen Buddhist Temple - CUP Suncol/Crest PUD Kai~r Commerce Center West Valley Materlab Solid Waste Collection & Recyelblg Facility California Speedway N. of I-t0 and Sa!~ Bernardino Ave/Cherry Ave. Proposed 26,000 spectator grandstand w/9v2~6 parking spaces Proposed 40 acres Approved S00~ acres Approved 30-*- acres Naps Lots CalMat Mining 82. State Route 30 Expansion N. of Naps St./Eflwanda Ave & San S~valne Channel Colon Wash Lytle Creek Portion Federal Hwy/CALTRANS Projzct F~:DER~L N~X~S PROJ£CTS/COUNTY OF SArN I~F. RNAI~nINO PROJECT CalMat SR 30/Oak Summit Eftwanda AGENCY F 90 13fi # SPECIES ACOE x Woolly-star FHWA x SBKR, CAGN Cactus Wren SR 30/Lytie Creek FHWA x woofly-star Foothill Trans Corridor-South FHWA x CAGN, LBVI, Cactus Wren Norton AFB Closure DOD x woolly-star, SBKi/ C M COMMENTS · · formal ~ctlon 7 consultation · · pro!loSing agreement- etiwanda min. 70~-800 Itcres AFS I · Be for Lyric Creek; still looking for mir site x · informal section 7 tonalsanson · informal ~ection 7 consultation Norton Levee/Santa Ann River ACOE It woolly-star 86. Seven Oak~ Dam 87. 88, $9. 90. 91. San Bern. Co flood control not cooperatiltg, ACOE ham't initiated yet ACOE x woolly-star, SBKR, DOLE presently Informal section 7 conmltatlon/FWS should reInMate Santa Ant River Groins Project ACOE · woolly-star 92. 93. Waterman CYN SR18 94, Inhnd Feeder BR x Riverside Co. Flood Control, informal, own#InS formal Lytle Creek Land & Resources ACOE x The Viilqes/ Greenspot Storm Drain ACOE x Glen Helen OHV Park ACOE · CaJon Wash San Bern. Valley Water Cons, ACOE Museums BA, Master Plan/SUN WEST El Rancho Verde Golf Course ACOE · woolly-star, SBKR, DOLE woolly-star, DOLE, SBKR woolly-star, DOLE, SBKR woolly-star, DOLE, SBKR SBKR self course/residential, 2000+ acres FWS working out mltilation FW$ commented on project notice FWS has San Bern. Co. u~d to address ? Oaks dam I~VS Comments to ACOE ACOE x SBICR, LBVI, Grn tiler beetle Comments on PN AFS sp.,CAGN Unaddr~ssed impacts eraale Show Road/Santa Ann River COUNTY OF RIVF. RSIl!E 9S. New Owl Rock Products (LILa. Mitsubishi) Wilson Creek mining operation · sand and gravel mtnIng company 100-150 acres of alluvial fan rage Krub and rilmrlun habitats/30-neres of coastal sajc scrub Lito~ure References & Citations Ahlborn, William O., !982 - Santa Ana River Basin Flood Hazard. San Bernardino County Museum Association Quarterly. Vol. XXIX, NO. 2, Winter 1982. Axeired, D, 1978 - The Origin of Coastal Sage Vegetation, Alta and Baja California, American Journal of Botany 65 (10): 1!17-1131. Bailey and Rice !969- Soil slippage: an indicator of slope instability on chaparral watersheds of southern California. Barbour, M. and J. Major 1977 - Terrestrial Vegetation of California. Iohn Wiley and Sons, New York. Baskin, J.M. and C.C. Baskin. 1973 - Plant population differences in dermoney and germination characteristics of seeds: heredity or environment?. American Midland Naturalist 90:493-498. Bent, A.C. 1949 - Life Histories of North American thrushes, kinglets~ end their allies. United States Na~.~r..a! Museum. B ulle~m. 196:~-411. Land Use Amendn~nt for Edison Utility Corridor (GPA 96-03B & GPA 97-01) (VPCA-96~-'01 &'-VPCA 97-01) ~,NE ~ EXHIBIT A 0.57 0.57 1.14 Miles N W E S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 96-03B & VCPA 96-01 L S.B.C.F.C. VC Area1 Area 2 I LM Area 3 ~-~e Ll!e H(! RESIDENTIAL L Low Density (2-4 DU/AC) LM Low Medium Density (4-8 DU/AC) M Medium Density (8--14 DU/AC) MH High Density. (24-30 DU/AC) COMMERCIAL CC Communi~' Commercial CF Community. Facility NC Neighborhood Commercial OP Office Park RC Recreational Commercial RRC Regional Related Office/Commercial VC Village Commercial L Highland Ave L LM 'ry St L LM H M M VC LM W~E 0 PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC E Elementary JRH Junior High School HS High School p Parks SBCFC San Bernardino County Flood Control UC Utility Corridor EXHIBIT B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GPA 97-01 & VCPA 97-01 Base Line Rd ' Area Area. 3 ;> LM Low Medium Density (4-8 DU/AC) M Medium Density (8-14 DU/AC) MH High Density (24-30 DU/AC) COMMERCIAL CC Community Commercial CF Community Facility NC Neighborhood Commercial OP Office Park RC Recreational Commercial RRC Regional Related Office/Commercial VC Village Commercial PUBLIC & QUASI-PUBLIC E Elementary. JRH Junior High School HS High School p Parks SBCFC San Bernardino County Flood Control UC Utility Corridor EXHIBIT C DATE: April 15, 1998 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director James Markman, City Attorney Debbie Adams, City Clerk Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director ~ BY: Cathy D. Wahlstrom, Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: Packinghouse Pre-demolition Services Staff Report The April 6, 1998 Agency Consent Calendar Item Number D.2. has a typographical error in the first sentence of the staff report. Please note that the Kleinfelder contract amount should be $55,473, not $50,473 as stated. CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION INLAND VALLEY MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA BOYS "C" DIVISION 1998 BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP Falbert Bartholomew Joshua Gwynn Ryan Irizarry Gary McNelly's, Jr. Joshua Ortiz Jeffery Post Carlton Russell Darreld Van Westrienen DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Mary E. M~er, PI~I ~olo~st 1429 F~ ~ CA 93023 (805)~04019 Post-iff Fax Note 7671 Phone it Fax # April 12, 1998 Ms. Rebecca Van Buren Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 VIA FACSIMILE Environmental Impact Report-General Plan Amendments 96-03 & 9%01 and Victoria Community Plan Amendments 96-01 & 9%01/Edison Company SCH # 97071043, San Bernardino County Dear Ms. Van Buren, The Departmere of Fish and Game (Department) would like to provide supplemental comments on the above-referenced EIR which would fezone 84 acres of land from utility corndot to residential development: Due to staff shortages and excessive workloads, the Department is unable to provide detailed comments on the project. However, we remain concerned with unmitigated losses of Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, Coastal Sage Scrub and mdexal habitats w~_hin the City of Rancho Cucamonga as proposed here. - These general conc,~xrts are addressed in related comments from the Department attached here which were rec~tly sent to your office in response to our ongoing dialogue regarding conservation platming and development issues in this area (see letter dated AIn/1 2, 1998). We also share the concerns raised by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) letter on the above project, dated December 23, 1997. The response in the FEIR to the USFWS comments dismiss tho significm. nce of habitat losses from this project. It should be noted that although the habitat ohsire may be disturbed, recent studies on the Etiwanda alluvial fan indicate that these habitats respond and recover from past disturbance events given adequate time. Many sites throughout southern California have experienced past disturbance events such as fire, 04/1371998 18:19 @05B408019 MMEYER PAGE 02 Page Two clearing and flooding, but ewmtuatly recover. In contrast, urban development will permanemly eliminate habitat values in the area and any potential recovery. While listed species of plants and amanaIs were not identified ohsire during project surveys, numerous other sensitive plant and wildlife species are likely to occur in the area, and impacts to these species and their habitat are significant and comribute to cumulative habitat losses in the region. The response to the USFWS in the Final EIR recognizes the cumulative impact of habitat loss, yet no mitigation is proposed Cumulative impacts are particularly important to address because the geographic extent of these habitats is so limited. When recently approved past, present and future projects are considered together, little habitat will remain unless cumulative losses are addressed and mitigated. This can be achieved through a combined effort of impact avoidance and compensation for unavoidable impacts through protection of habitat in key areas. The Department is completing a conservation plan for the Day Canyon/Efiwanda alluvial fan that we hope will be available for distribution to your city in the very near future. This conservation plan, developed by the California Polytechnic Institute at Pomona, is intended to serve as a guide for lead agencies and resource managers to increase our understanding of there habitats and to assist in mifig~..t/on .and land use planning. The existing North Eftwanda habitat preserve is only one of several key publically owned parcels on the north fan, and the cominued viability of these areas depends upon preserving representalive stands of Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, Coastal Sage Scrub and Alluvial Chaparral throughore the remaining habitat areas in the Rancho Cucamonga Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding these comments, and if you need further assistence i.n developing mitigation strategies for this, and other, upcoming projects, attachment Scott Eliason, USFWS Liam Davis, NCCP, CDFG Sincerely, Mary E' E'~. M. Mey~ ~' ~u~ O-~ Plant Ecologist, Natural Heritage Division REVISED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF -REPORT DATE: April I5, 1998 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Citiy Manager FROM: BY: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager/Acting Community Services Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II 9'~' SUBJECT: Approval of Contract and Appropriation of Funds for Display of Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the contract for the display of the Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall to be display in Rancho Cucamonga on October 23- 29, 1998 and appropriate $3,000 for FY1997/1998 expenses (account number 01-4532-6028). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As Council is aware, the Veteran of Foreign Wars (VFW) Post 8680 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ubmitted an application to bring the Vietnam Memorial Moving Wall to the City of Rancho Cucamonga back in 1996. Staff and the VFW have been working to secure a date for this profoundly,,moving exhibit to be displayed in our community. We are pleased to inform the Council that staff has recently been notified that Rancho Cucamonga has been scheduled to display the moving wall between October 23-29, 1998. The Memorial is made up of many panels which vary in height from three feet to six feet. Each panel weight approximately 40-48 pounds. The wall pieces are fit into a 'U' frame and then are staked to the ground. The minimum area required for the wall structure is 220 feet by 64 feet. The Epicenter soccer fields have been identified as an ideal location for the display of the Memorial due to the abundance of parking available at the site and the size of the fields. Community Services and Engineering staff and the VFW Post 8680 are working together to coordinate the display of the Memorial in our community. It is estimated that total expenses (FY 1997/1998 and FY 1998/1999) for this event will total approximately $8,000. Staff is requesting that City Council appropriate $3,000 in the current fiscal year budget for the deposit to secure the dates for our exhibit. Staff has included as part of the Community Services Department's budget request for fiscal year 1998/1999 the remaining $5,000 for event expenses. k,~)eputy City Manager/Acting Commun'ty Services Director JF/PP/pp