Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/08/09 - Agenda PacketWEDNESDAY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 9, 1995 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 7:00 P.M. Roll Call II. Chairman Barker Vice Chairman McNiel Commissioner Lumpp Announcements Commissioner Melcher Commissioner Tolstoy IIl. IV. Ve Approval of Minutes Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. mo POINT 'OF HISTORIC INTEREST 95-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to designate the Etivista Winery as a Point of Historic Interest, located at 12700 12752 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-221-03 and 22 through 24. Public Comments VI. This is the time andplace for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Commission Business VII. Adjournment L Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certi~ that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 3, 1995, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954. 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. VICINITY MAP CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 9, 1995 Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 95-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to designate the Eftvista Winery as a Point of Historic Interest, located at 12742, 12762, 12768, and 12774 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 227-221-03 and 22 through 24. BACKGROUND: The Commission initiated this application at their meeting on July 12, 1995 as part of an in-progress unreinforced masonry building abatement by the City Building Division. At this previous meeting, the Commission determined that the unreinforced portion of the subject building could be removed without significant loss to the historical value and there was sufficient cause to initiate an application for Point of Historic Interest. ANALYSIS: A. Architectural Significance and Building Conditions: The winery is composed of three main structures, attached by enclosed breezeways (see Exhibit "B" for site locations). The only portion that is unreinforced masonry is Building No. 2, built in 1936. This structure is the portion that the Building Department is abatement of under the unreinforced masonry building code. This building is in terrible condition with numerous structural cracks. Also, the original construction was of exceptionally bad quality, as evidenced by the extreme variation of mortar thickness (varying from 1/8 inch to 3 inches) and exhibiting a number of different types and sizes of block. The structure is completely hidden from general public view by its location and the proximity of the other structures. The other winery structures are primarily poured-in-place concrete and corrugated metal. There are some limited areas of masonry infill. Only Building No. 1 is currently occupied, with two tenants conducting vehicle repair services. The winery structures are of an undistinguished industrial style and, except for the remains of a painted sign on the east side of Building No. 3, are not understood visually as a winery by anyone passing by the location. ITeM A HPC STAFF REPORT POI 95-01 - ETIVISTA WINERY August 9, 1995 Page 2 There are other structures on the site: two single-family residences (one is a 1920's California style bungalow that appears to be in deteriorated condition; the other is reported to be of the same era, but was remodeled to its present 1950's architectural style). Also, there is a concrete grape-crushing building and a wood bam of unknown condition. B. Historical Significance: Details concerning the historical aspects of the site were made available by the Foothill Market Place Oral History project. Oral interviews with Buster Filpi (nephew of Nick DiCarlo), confirmed Building records that the Etivista Winery was started in 1936. The winery was a partnership between Nick DiCarlo, Frank Shiro, and Buster Filpi. Undoubtedly, this winery was part of the tremendous growth in wine making experienced at the end of prohibition. The wine was both bottled and shipped in bulk to the East. By 1947, Buster Filpi ended his role in the partnership since the enterprise was not making a profit. It should be noted that many wineries had difficulties during this period because of over-production and a changing market according to a publication entitled Cucamonga Wines and Vines: A History of the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association, written by James D. Hofer. The winery continued to produce for five or six more years, ending production in about 1953 or 1954. Since that time the buildings have held a number of industrial tenants and are currently held by an out-of-town investor. It does not appear that the Etivista Winery was ever part of a larger wine-producing consortium such as the Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Association. The facility could be classified as a small- to medium-sized operation that operated for the relatively short pedod of approximately 20 years. In terms of historical significance, the winery did not play a significant historical role in the winery industry of the region; i.e., there were, and are, other sites that were larger and operated longer. The major historical significance is that the original partnership was composed of related family members that were active in the wine- making region from the early 1900s to the 1970s at other sites. However, the family history aspects have been documented and preserved in the oral histories performed for the Foothill Market Place project. Exhibit "B" shows the historical uses and occupants of the subject structures. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The recommended facts for findings are included in the attached Resolution of Approval. HPC STAFF REPORT POI 95-01 - ETIVISTA WINERY August 9, 1995 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The designation of a property as a Point of Historic Interest is categorically exempt under Article 19, Section 15308 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project. RECOMM!::NDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission approve the attached Resolution recommending the City Council designate the Etivista Winery a Point of Historic Interest. Respectfully submitted, ~" Bra ulle~ City Planner BB:LJH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Historical Resources Form Exhibit "B" - Site/Building Location Map Exhibit "C" - Building Pictures Resolution of Approval State of CaLifornia - The Resources Agency DEPARTHENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATZON 1. Historic Name: Etavista Winery Common or Current Name: He[ Tinker Truck Repair Nt~ber & Street: 12742 FoothiLL BLvd. City: Rancho Cucamonga Vicinity OnLy: 4. Quad Map No:. UTH Z A: B: 5. Parcel No: 0227-221-03 Other: Set. No. National Register Status: Local Designation: Zip: County (3-Letter Designator): C: D: DESCRIPTZON 6. Property Category: If District, Nt~nber of Documented Resources: 7. BriefLy describe the present physical appearance of the property, including condition, boundaries, surroundings, and (if appropriate) architectural style: This uilt be a Large rectangular shaped industrial building, with Lou gable roof. There is a parapet along the front of the building in a step pattern. The sides of the building appear to be concrete block with the upper 1/3 in uhat appears to be corrugated iron. There is a Large warehouse door on the Nest side of the structure. There are two front windows that are one over one double hung, with wood frames. ALong the parapet of the structure are [No horizontaL bands cast into the Nat[ that run along the front walt. No Landscaping is present at this site. Chain [ink fencing surrounding the front and west side of the structure. 8. Atterationa & Date: 9. ReLated Features on Property: 10. PLanning Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga 11. O~ner & Address: H&L FoothiLL Partnership 2193 Hackmore Pt. Riverside, CA 92506 Type of O~nership: Private Present Use:Light LndustriaL Zoning: Co~merciaL (S.P.) Threats: URMB/RDA H]STORZCAL ZNFORNAT]ON 16. Constuction Date(s): 19~6-19~7 17. Architect: Unkno~n~ 18. Historic Attributes (With Number from List): OriginaL Location: Yes Suitder: Unknown Date Moved: S/GN;F[CANCE AND EVALUATION 19. Context for EvaLuation: Theme: Area: Period: Property Type: Context formaLLy developed?: 20. BriefLy discuss the properry's importance within the context. Use historical end architectural analysis as appropriate. Compare with similar properties. This is a Late period industrial style building of no unusual architecture styling. It is a very simple building of concrete block and corrugated iron. It appears to have been built in 1946 and 1947 while the property was owned by Frank and Minnie SchJro. [t is a very commo~ structure end many exaep[es of this style can be found. 21. Sources: San Bernardino County Assessor Lot Books 22. 24. 25. 26. 27. AppLicabLe National Register Criteria: Other recognition: State Landmark EvaLuator: Ly~n MerriLL Year of EvaLuation: 1990 Survey Type: S (C=Comprehenaive, P=Project ReLated, S=SingLe Property Survey Nasa: Rancho Cucamonga Update/URM Assesshunt Year Form Prepared: 1990 By (Name): Lynn MerriLL Organization: Management Sciences AppLications, Inc. Address: 1Z~ East Ninth Street, Suite 204 City, State Zip: UpLand, CaLifornia, 91786 Phone: (714) 981-0894 Sketch map. Show t~cation and boundaries of property in retati/6n to nearby streets, railways, natural tendee7 etc. Name each feature. n North side of Bldg.s 1,2, &3 North & West sides of Bldg. 1 Etivi Winery 5/95 Exhibit C 1 Eti~a Winery 5~95 Exhibit C2 East sidle of Bldg.3 & Barn Detail of east side of Bldg.3 Etivist~/(inery 5/95 Exhibit C3 South side of Bldg.3 & east side Bldg.2 I Detail of east side of Bldg.2 Etivista Winery 5~95 Exhibit C4 Joe Di Carlo Residence 5/95 Exhibit C6 Nick Di Carlo Residence Unidentified Residence south of Bldg.2 Etivi.~ta Winery 5/95 Exhibit C7 Remains of Conc.cooling tank in foreground Conc. Grape Crushing Bldg. -""'4 Weir Box behind Grape Crusher EtJvis~ta Winery 5/95 Exhibit C8 Painted Sign on east side of Bldg.3 North side of Barn or Shed Etivista Winery 5/95 Exhibit C9 RESOLUTION NO. 95-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 95-01 TO DESIGNATE THE ETIVISTA WINERY, LOCATED AT 12742, 12762, 12768, and 12774 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST - APN: 227-221-03 AND 22 THROUGH 24. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for a Point of Historic Interest as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Point of Historic Interest is referred to as "the application." 2. On August 9, 1995, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 4.20 acres of land, basically four parcels of rectangular configuration, located 12742, 12762, 12768, and 12774 Foothill Boulevard. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 9, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed Point of Historic Interest was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Fact/s: Oral interviews with Buster Filpi (nephew of Nick DiCarlo), confirmed building records that the Etivista Winery was started in 1936. The winery was a partnership between Nick DiCarlo, Frank Shiro, and Buster Filpi. Undoubtedly this winery was part of the tremendous growth in wine-making experienced at the end of prohibition. These three families were very instrumental in the HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-05 POI 95-01 - ETIVISTA WINERY August 9, 1995 Page 2 establishment of the ethr~ically diverse vintner community of the Cucamonga Valley Wine Region. Finding 2:The proposed Point of Historic Interest is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Fact/s: In terms of historical significance, the winery did not play a significant historical role in the winery industry of the region; i.e., there were, and are, other sites that were larger and operated longer. The major historical significance is that the original partnership was composed of related family members that were active in the wine-making region from the early 1900s to the 1970s at other sites. At the height of winery production, the Cucamonga Winery Region boasted of ninety-nine operating wineries. Presently, there are approximately six remaining sites that retain varying degrees of historical value within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Point of Historic Interest 95-01. 6. The Chairman of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 1995. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman HPC RESOLUTION NO. 95-05 POI 95-01 - ETIVISTA WINERY August 9, 1995 Page 3 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 9th day of August 1995, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: