HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/06/04 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
it AGENDA
THURSDAY JUNE 4, 1992 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Pledge of Allegiance
'7:0_`5 PM II. Roll. Call
Commissioner Arner X Commissioner Haskvitz X
Commissioner Banks X Chairman Preston X
Commissioner Billings A Commissioner Schmidt X
Commissioner Cooper X
III. Old Business
A. Return list to
:staff by 7/15- A. ORAL HISTORY LIST UDPATE - Oral Report
discuss at August
meeting. B. FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE. INTEGRAL PUBLIC ART REVIEW
B. Artwork preferences
selected-fwd'd tiV. Director's Reports
Planning Comm.
C. Slide show & C. AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION'S NATIONAL CONFERENCE 1992,
summary given by WASHINGTON, D.C. - Observations
Preston
D. Continued to July D. CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION CONFERENCE 1992, EUREKA - Slideshow
Meeting
V. Commission Business
E. Goals set for year E. GOALS AND WORK PROGRAM WORKSHOP (Continued from April 2,
of 1992-93 1992) - Oral Report
VI. Announcements
No Comments VII. Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public to address the
Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not
already appear on this agenda.
10:25 PM VIII. Adjournment
Adjourned to tour of the Demens-Tolstoy House on June 19, 1992.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
AGENDA
THURSDAY JUNE 4, 1992 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Pledge of Allegiance
II. Roll Call
Commissioner Arner Commissioner Haskvitz
Commissioner Banks Chairman Preston
Commissioner Billings Commissioner Schmidt
Commissioner Cooper
III. Old Business
A. ORAL HISTORY LIST UDPATE - Oral Report
B. FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE INTEGRAL PUBLIC ART REVIEW
IV. Director's Reports
C. AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION'S NATIONAL CONFERENCE 1992,
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Observations
D. CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION CONFERENCE 1992, EUREKA - Slideshow
V. Commission Business
E. GOALS AND WORK PROGRAM WORKSHOP (Continued from April 2,
1992) - Oral Report.
VI. Announcements
VII. Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public to address the
Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not
already appear on this agenda.
VIII. Adjournment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 4, 1992
TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF INTEGRAL PUBLIC ART FOR FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE
BACKGROUND: On December 4, 1990, the Historic Preservation Commission
recommended to the City Council a Point of Interest Designation for the
Foothill Marketplace site, generally located on the south side of
Foothill Boulevard between I-15 and Etiwanda Avenue. As a part of this
recommendation, the Commission placed a condition on the project
requiring the integration of public art into the design of the buildings
that reflected the familial and wine-making past of the southern
Etiwanda area. The City Council subsequently approved the Point of
Interest designation, including in their Resolution the condition for
integrated public art.
On May 5, 1992, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the
proposals submitted by the applicant, The Wattson Arno Company. After
considering the various designs, media, and styles, the Commission
directed the applicant and staff to pursue murals that depicted a
realistic style and utilized subtle colors and tones so as not to
"fight" with the design and colors of the buildings. The Commission
suggested that the works of Rebecca Guzak and Susana Sheid seemed to
meet this criteria. Additionally, the Commission stated that several
smaller murals be provided across the site instead of one 20 X 40 foot
mural.
As a supplement to the pictoral representations of the history, the
Commission suggested that the ideas provided by Linda Quinn might be
incorporated into the center. The use of grape leaves on an arch or
stamped into the concrete was rather appealing. The Commission was also
receptive to the idea of a bas-relief located in the center of the main
plaza.
Finally, the Commission felt it essential that narrative text be
provided to describe the Etiwanda history. By providing the different
media, the Commission felt that all segments of the community would be
able to view and understand the history of southern Etiwanda.
ZtLm 3
HPC STAFF REPORT
REVIEW OF INTEGRAL ART PROGRAM
June 4, 1992
Page 2
DISCUSSION: Following the Historic Preservation Commission meeting,
staff met with the applicant and the artists to further define the scope
of the art and offered suggestions on locations, content, and style.
The applicant has been pursuing that direction with the artist and has
provided the compilation of the various discussions. At the time of
staff report preparation, staff had not reviewed the proposal. As a
result, staff will verbally update the Commission at the meeting on any
areas of concern and/or consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation
Commission consider the proposal and, if found to be acceptable, forward
a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission for
incorporation of the public art into the design of the Foothill
Marketplace center.
Respectfully submitted,
/Larry J. Henderson, AICP
Principal Planner
LJH:SM/jfs
Attachments: Integral Public Art Proposal (dated May 28, 1992)
ij - Z
City of Rancho Cucamonga
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO: -C�IoArmavl
FROM: La=aiu.oc.
SUBJECT: JE pia e a c (So o-- s -u�.1 iso' a-al C oeU a-ttid
tA
o►n�e. two t
14()u-r
VAs
VIA 'St-
I
0-0�10-
for
c w-d-
u S
RCForms/Memo.290
r '?AFT
FOR T31SCUSSION P4.9RQOSES ONI_Y
O RAL H= STORY
PERSONS \ TOP= C S
LIS T
# INAMETOPIC A/C/E 19_ Evt/Per/P1 . NOM. PHONE#
I
I� 1 jArt Bridge 1A/ Managed Hamilton Ranch ` EB
r 2 (Ada Cooper C/ Lucas Ranch - Old Cucamonga IEB
�+ 3 Gene Billings IA/ Old Alta Loma - Fire Dept . IEB I II
4 Bob Hickcox E/ Etiwanda Water Co . EB
11 5 ILaurel Hawker A/C/E Alta Loma School Attendee EB
I
Ir 6 Elmer&Lawrence Mueller E/ MB
II 7 ( Flora Hoppe OkaneJE/ Born & raised on Hoppe Tree Farm IMB I II
4
8 Marie Gricko AC II
I I AC
1�
19 lElizabeth Whitson '
I10 IMrs . Beekman
AC
Ill
I11 ( Barbara 0v'i ngs IC/ Father was the town . barber IAC I II
I I
I12 Eunice Lewis AC
i I
113 LoucibGMurray I
AC I
I
I1L4Barbara Anderson C/ First Miss Cucamonga AC I
115 Stearling Kincadel IAC I -41
f16 Dan Milliken C/ Grape Industry Expert IAC Ii
17 Paul Hbfer C/ Grape Industry Expert JAC I
18 Bob Deba rgrd AC
1
I
II19 Mrs . Robt . Williams E/ IBH i 1I
ir2OMrs . J .M. Wilson E/ ( J .H . Scott Pioneer) BH II
I
21 IMr . Terry Frost E/ ( Geo Frost Pioneer) IBH
f
I22 Mr . James Frost E/ (Geo Frost Pioneer) BH
123 Ray Henderson IE/ (Henderson ' s Pioneer Family) BH
X24 Ken Perdew E/ (Perdew' s Pioneer Family) BH
125J . L . Perdew IE/ (Perdew' s Pioneer Family) JBH
I
1126 IMr &Mrs L Mueller E/ (Mueller ' s Pioneer Family) IBH I
DRAFT
f'OR DISCO: ON PURPOSES ONLY
ORAL H= STORY
PERSONS \ TOP= CS
L Z S T
Page 2 of 2 .
# NAME TOPIC A/C/E 19` Evt/Per/P1 . NOM. PHONE#
X27 IMrs . T . Harne ! E/ (Mueller-Price-Hoppe Pioneers) BH
+128 'Mrs . F. O ' Kane E/ (Mueller- Price-Hoppe Pioneers) IBH
i
II 29 !Mrs . James Clark IE/ (Johnston-Pearson Pioneers) IBH I III
30 IA. W. Mc Guire ' E/ Former Constable rBH I ��
I
Il 31 IMrs . Bonanno IE/ Early Grape Growers BH II
432 IMrs . N. Swaithes f)
1133 I Mrs. W. Blair
I I I II
? 34 Mr . V. Di Carlo
�35 I Mr . J. Guidera 16'l�rc� C� dP,rct Uecc�io
X36 'Mr . David Trujillo E/ Families from Mexico -Grape Workers
37 Mr . Tony Bermudez I �I
I I I
I38 Mrs . Dorothy Hickcox E/Principal&Teacher Etiwanda/Cuc . sch "
:39. A -MAller co- IfxtArn Vi Co.s Sas-
I�qqh8
I I
IiL4 . !A I bent Breese wt p_eacht e-c,—Coca ww VA a- ! I II
4evn rie t fA ROM LkL r) I W i vle-ma ICi -- Coca wap v� ct II
(v. I Pz�c� o ls+o LA -DJ2 ry-vtS � I
i
7.
Do vi z L d C—r?,[[ta.vv 0 ' u1 r_&Mak;
riLV l A VYI Ir vO C 1 Q W I pi-I Vta(,u VY, n
I �
II I I it
I I I I
' I
z�,FT
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GOALS AND MISSION
STRENGTHS
* Work well together
* Getting purpose across/developer mitigations
- Recognition and respect (from Planning Commission, City Council and the
press)
- Statewide Recognition
* Great staff support
* Mills Act
* Involved in broader range of issues
- Route 30
- Tree Preservation
- More comprehensive, diverse, aware
* Technical expertise
* Higher expectations
* Diversity of Members
* Archives Development
* Growing legislative awareness
- 1 -
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GOALS AND MISSION
WEAKNESSES
* Let things drift
- Lone Cypress tree
- Land bank
- Committees (automatic reminder)
* Overwhelming the (people) power
* Level of technical expertise
- Education/In-service training
* Time
- Alternatives
- Regular cycles
- Immediacy of decisions
* Revenue generation
* Amount of work between meetings
- Meet at sites
- More inter-meeting involvement
* No preservation resolution for CEQA (need guidelines)
* Relations with other Commissions and Engineering
2 -
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COlII►IISSION GOALS AND lIISSION
OPPORTUNITIES
* Route 30 process
- Coordination of subcommittees
* Oral History Program
- losing oral history candidates
* Public relations and education
- Schools
- Better use of schools
- Elementary school education
* Archives and History Center development
* Volunteer services
* City Library?
* Philanthropic opportunities
- Donor programs
- Community Foundation
- 3 -
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GOALS AND MISSION
THREATS
* Economy (backed into a corner - "selling out" )
- Maintaining integrity in hostile business climate
* Misinformation to public regarding Historic Preservation Commission
activities
* Environmental threats
- Rural landscape
- Sphere-of-Influence area (Etiwanda Wash)
* Demographic change
- Educate
- Incorporate other demographic/ethnic communities
* Budget constraints/staff resources
* Aging resources
* Benign neglect
4 -
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMISSION GOALS AND KISSION
GOALSell 4-
1 . Complete 20 oral interviews
2. Education and public relations (ongoing) ,'th�rawti�,ls� C-
Z A - after school in-service (break out) C49 .
34
4. Educate Engineering Department
5. Etiwanda Specific Plan revision
6. Alta Loma Packing House
7. Route 30
9. Philanthropic opportunities �b �t 0.'`i a. .S JraPS Pr0�
10. Archives
11. Old Alta Loma
14. North Town survey
I Co rehCIA S 'ivc. SL,rj
5 - i1►t'v kSjY'L
NOTICE OF ADJOURNMLNT
Notice .is hereby given that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation
Commission, at their meeting of June 4, 1992, adjourned said meeting to
a tour of the Demens-Tolstoy House, located at 9686 Hillside Road,
Rancho Cucamonga, on June 19, 1992 at 4:00 PM. Said adjournment was
passed by the following vote:
Ayes: ARNER, BANKS, COOPER, HASKVITZ, PRESTON, SCHMIDT
Noes: NONE
Absent: BILLINGS
Abstain: NONE
June 5, 1992 _
Date Shelley Pet elli, Secretary
Historic Preservation Commission
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION AGENDA
THURSDAY JUNE 4 , 1992 4 : 00 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
JOINT WORKSHOP ON OLD ALTA LOMA PLAN
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I . ROLL CALL
Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Vallette
Commissioner Melcher
Commissioner Arner Commissioner Haskvitz
Commissioner Banks Commissioner Preston
Commissioner Billings Commissioner Schmidt
Commissioner Cooper
II. OLD ALTA LOMA NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
4 : 01 p.m. Introduction
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner
4 : 05 p.m. Staff Presentation
Staff will present a summary of issues
discussed at the April 28, 1992 , Old Alta
Loma Neighborhood Meeting and provide an
outline of the anticipated approach for the
development of the neighborhood plan
4 : 30 p.m. Public comments
This is the time for the general public to
address the Commissions on this item
4 : 50 p.m. Commissions' Comments/Direction
The Commissioners will discuss approaches to
the neighborhood plan formulation and
provide general direction as may be deemed
necessary
5: 30 p.m. Closing Remarks
Larry Henderson, Principal Planner
III. Adjournment