HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-088 - ResolutionsRESOLUTIONNO. 94-088
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL~ OF THE CITY OF
RANC~O ~, CALIFORNIA, D~9~3%R//gS ITS
IANDSCAPE ~CE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B,
4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95
P~RSL~NT TO THE IANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF
1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
OBJ~ZTIONS TH~RET0
WHerEAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, txlrsuant to
the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Divisiom 5
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as
follows:
Description of Work:
S~L~CION 1: ~nat the public interest and convenience require and it is
the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within
Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the
fiscal year 1994/95 for the main~ and operation of those parkways, parks
and facilities thereon dedicated for c~m¥~n greenbelt purposes by deed or
recorded subdivision tract mp within the boundaries of said Districts. Said
maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape
maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of
any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection
with said districts.
Location of Work:
SIDCI~ON 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the
roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the report of tb~ City
Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City
Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Iandscape Maintenance Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.
Description of Assessment Districts:
SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City
Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City
Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts,
which said districts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and
which districts are described as follows:
All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included
within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain '5~ap of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1", '9~ap of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2",
'94ap of Landscape MainteD2unce District No. 3A, 'SWap of Landscape Maintenance
District No. 3B, "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", '~4ap of
Tm _n~cape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District
No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of
the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on
file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City.
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 2
Approximately 22.87 acres of the ~ult Sports Complex will be accepted
into Tandscape Maintenance District 3B this fiscal year. Reference is hereby
made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said
assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all
details as to the extent of said assessment districts.
Report of Engineer:
SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has approved
the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of
the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the
method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file
in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is
hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments
and for the extent of the work.
TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING:
SfL~I~ION 5: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVf~ THAT A PUBLIC HEARING IS HEREBY
SC~I~IX~,m IN THE CIVIC CENTERCOUNCIL(~U~BERS, 10500 CIVIC C~FfERDRIVE, CITY
OF RAN(~O~, CAT~FORNIA, 91730.
WfIINESDAY, JUNE 1, 1994, AT 7:00 P.M.
ANY ANDALLPERSONSMAYAPPEARAND SHOW C~USEWHY SAID~CEAND SERVICE
FOR THEEXISTING I~°ROV~4~q~SANDTHEPROPOSfD ~4P~OVf}~gTS SHOULD NOTBEDONE
OR CARRIfD OUT OR WHY ASSESSM~gTS SHOULD NOT BE LEVIfD AND OOT~.I~"f.-T]~ FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PROTESPSMUSTBE IN WRITINGANDMUSTCONTAINA DESC~TPI~ON
OF THE PROPERTY IN WHICH EACH SIGN~R THEREOF IS INTERES~f~D, SUFFICIf~gT TO
IDf~fIFYTHE SAME, AND MUST BE D~.IVERfD TOTHE CITY cL~RKOFSAIDCITYPRIOR
TO THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING, ANDNO OTHER~ OR OBJECTIONS WILLBE
OONSIDERfD. IF THE SIGNER OFANY PROTEST IS NOTSHOWNUPONTHELASTf~LIZfD
ASSESSM~Ff ROLL SUCH PROTEST MUST CONTAIN OR BE ACCOMPANIfD BY WRITTEN
EVIDf:gCETHAT SUCH SIGNER IS THE OWNEROFTHEPROPERTY SO DESCRIBfD.
Landscaping andLightingA~t of 1972:
SfL~F/ON 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried
through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California
designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of
the Streets and Highways code of the State of California.
Publication of Resolution of Intention:
SECTION 7 Published notice shall be madepursuant to Section 6961 of the
Gcve~=~m-~nt Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk
shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be
published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the
Inland Valley Dailv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in
the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADO~ this 4th day of May, 1994.
Alexander, Buquet, Gutierrez, Stout, Williams
None
None
AYES:
NOES:
ABSm~:
Dennis L. Stout, Mayor
· D~hra J. City Clerk
I, D~RRA J. ADAMS, CITY c~.FRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a
regular meeting of said City Council held on the 4th day of May, 1994.
Executed this 5thday of May, 1994, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
· , City Clerk
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 4
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. I
(General City)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
William J.(IQ'Neil, City Engineer
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 5
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
(General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Community Trails)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways,
Medians, Parks and Community Trails) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of
Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 29.94 acres of landscape area and
38.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not
considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the
entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a
distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district
have been annexed upon development.
The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street
trees, entry monuments, Community Trails and parks. The 38.25 acres of parks consist of Bear
Gulch Park which is 5 acres, 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park. 6.5
acres of Church Street Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center which consists of
1.75 acres. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
93/94 94/95
Ground Cover and Shrubs 21.47 21.47
Turf 1.47 1.47
Parks 28.25 38.25
Community Trails 7.00 7.00
Total Area in LMD #1 68.19Acres 68.19 Acres
The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas of the various landscape areas and the parks are
maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian
trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew.
Projected Costs~
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #1 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs and the maintenance of the parks. These functions, along with tree maintenance and
certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services
Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and
Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails within the district. The proiected costs to
operate and maintain LMD #1 are as follows:
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 6
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental
Contract Services
Parkway & Median Landscape Maintenance
Park Landscape Maintenance
Tree Maintenance
Athletic Light Maintenance
Tree Inventory Field Data Collection
Capital Expenditures
A.D.A. Tot Lot Retrofit - Bear Gulch Park
Capital Project Outlay
Capital Equipment Outlay
Capital Vehicles Outlay
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
$49,5]0.00
$18,320.00
$39,740.00
$16,310.00
$1,000.00
$285,000.00
$145,600.00
$12,000.00
$13,000.00
$7,550.00
$30,000.00
$147,900.00
$1,550.00
$8,650.0O
$8,260.00
$145,000.00
$42,000.00
$971,390.00
$119,220.00
$145.410.00
$264,630.00
Total Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
$1,236,020.00
<$294,000.00>
Assessment Revenue Required
$942,020.00
For 94/95 the Capital Project Outlay budgeted for the district is as follows; $13,000 for a
Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrades, $600 for Irrigation Controller Improvements, $5,000 for
Tot Lot deck replacement at East Beryl Park, $3,000 for tot lot deck replacement at Church
Street Park, $8,000 roof repair at Bear Gulch and Chuch Street Parks, $8,000 for parkway street
tree repaicement throughout the district, S12,000 for landscape maintenance material
replacement, $1,430 for Haven Avenue Median moisture sensors, $16,250 for irrigation
improvements to control parks, $1,200 for MWD lease for East and West Beryl Parks and
$79,420 for irrigation improvements to contol parkways. Capital Equipment Outlay of $1,550 is
for 27% of the purchase price of two shared personnel computers for the Landscape Maintenance
Supervisors. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $3,850 is for 12% of a 1/2 ton flat bed truck for the Tree
Maintenance Crew and $4,800 for 34% of a 4WD utility vehicle for the Trails Crew. There is
also $30,000 under Capital Improvement Projects for Phase I of ADA (Americans with
Disabilities Act) Retrofit to Bear Gulch Park.
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 7
Analysis:
Overall budgeted maintenance costs for LMD #1 decreased from $946,710 in 93/94 to $942,040 in
94/95. Proposed water usage costs have decreased $37,000 for the upcoming year, this is due to a
combination of water conservation efforts, last year's wet winter and mild summer. These
factors along with a 93/94 carryover has allowed the recommended assessment rate to remain
constant.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
The FY 94/95 assessment rate is $92.21, this is no increase over FY 93/94 rate. The following
itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/
! and Use Type Units Rat~ Factor A.U.
Single Family Parcel 7,833 $92.21 1.0 $92.21
Multi-Family Parcel 4.766 $92.21 0.5 $46.11
Totals
Revenue
$722,270
$219.7650
$942,020
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 8
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 9
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT #1
ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95
MARCH 17, 1993
PM 11738 3 DU - 3AU
APRIL 7, 1993
PM 13800 2 DU- 2AU
NOVEMBER 17, 1993
PM 13075 2 DU - 2AU
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 10
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
2
3
DENOTES EQUESTRIAN TRAIl.
DENOTES STREET LIGHT'
80'
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO p M i~? ~8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ex H~ ~ "A"
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 11
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
STIqEE'I' LIGHI'ING MAINTENANCE D~S?RI¢'I' NOS. 1 AND 2
..~~.~.. 4) I?Y OF RANC)HO C~UCAMONGA
C)OUNTY Oil' SAN BERNARDINO
' ~.~.~ STATE O, P,,ALI,ORNIA
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 12
AENYIRONMENTAL
RIGHTECH
ENGINEERIN~
I. r ~L ~n ! _,-, ',--, C:A $t40~
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 13
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape. Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 1994 / 95
William J. 0 ~I, City Engineer
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 14
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned
Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the
Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as
such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those
parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that planned community.
The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos,
Community Trails and parks. The 27.5 acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park,
Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park. The breakdown of maintained areas
is as follows:
93/94 94/95
Ground Cover and Shrubs 47.99 47.99
Turf 40.13 40.13
Parks 27.50 27.50
Communil~ Trails 3.00 3.00
Total Area in LMD #2 118.62 Acres 118.62
Acres
The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Trails and
Application Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the
equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the
district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 are as follows:
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 15
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Regular Payroll
Overtime Salaries
Part Time Salaries
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Mileage
Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental
Contract Services
Landscape Maintenance
Tree Maintenance
Capital Expenditures
ADA Retrofit to Windrows,Kenyon, Groves &
Vintage Parks
Capital Improvement Projects
Capital Vehicle Outlay
Capital Equipment Outlay
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Total Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Assessment Revenue Required
$355,830.00
$5,000.00
$4,650.00
$131,660.00
$65,720.00
$10,000.00
$0.00
$1,000.00
$539,200.00
$10,000,00
$140,000.00
$336,900.00
$26,700.00
$3,850.00
$11,390.00
$350,000.00
$20,000.00
$2,011,90(.I.00
$ ] 43,410.00
$107,380.00
$250,790.00
$2,262,690.00
<$551,190.iX)>
$1,711,500.00
For FY 94/95, the district budgeted $140,000 for a A.D.A (American's with Disabilities Act)
retrofit to Windrows, Kenyon, Groves and Vintage Parks. This retrofit will update the play
equipment and surfacing in the tot lots of those parks for A.D.A compliance. Also Budgeted is
$8,000 to replace the tot lot bridge at Kenyon Park and $5,000 to replace the exercise station.
$320,400 for various renovations and improvements to the parkway and parks irrigation
systems. $20,000 for landscape plant material replacement. Capital Equipment Outlay of
$3,850 is to purchase equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew
and the Trails and Application Crew. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $26,700 to purchase 17% of a
1.5 ton flat bed truck w/ dump, 50% tof a utility truck and 27% Of a 4WD utility vehilce for
trails.
Analysis:
In FY 93/94, the Assessment rate for LMD #2 was $422.00. It is recommended this rate not
increase for the FY 94/95. Part of the reason that the rate did not increase is due to the fact
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 16
that water usage is down partly because of the implementation of the Ca,sense Moisture
Control irrigation system and partly because of the increased rainfall last season. Also, there
is a fairly large FY 93/94 carryover that helps offset the overall costs. There were no new
assessments units added to the district this year.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Unit Rate/
I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 3,763.00 $422.00 1.0 $422.00 $1,587,990
Multi-Family Parcel 124.00 $422.00 1.0 $422.00 $52,330
Commercial Acre 32.02 $422.00 2.0 $844.00 $27,020
Vacant Acre 418.63 $422.00 0.25 $105.50 $44.160
TOTALS 4,400.74 $1,711,500
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 17
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 18
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No.
(Hyssop)
3a
Fiscal Year 1994/95
Approved: - William J. O Neil i~ty~n~ineer
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 19
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a
(Hyssop Maintenance District)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance
District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of
the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (LMD #3a) represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop
Drive south of Sixth Street. The site is associated with an area within that district and as
such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those
parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
93 / 94 94 / 95
Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.14 0.14
Turf 0.00 0.00
Total Area in LMD #3a 0.14 Acres 0.14 Acres
The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3a are for direct maintenance of ground cover and
shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and
testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3a are as
follows:
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 20
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Landscape and Tree Maintenance
Capital Expenditures
Landscape Plant Material Renovations
Controller Cabinet Safety Improvement
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
$0.00
$0.00
$200.00
$0.00
$1,530.00
$1,400.00
$20O.OO
$30.00
$600.00
$120.00
$4,080.00
Assessment Administration and .
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
$270.00
$220.00
$490.00
Gross Revenue Required:
$4,570.00
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
<$1,260.00>
Total Revenue Required:
$3,310.00
For 94/95 the district budgeted $1,400.00 landscape plant material renovation. No vehicle or
equipment purchases are budgeted for in 94/95.
Analysis:
It is recommended the assessment rate for LMD #3a will remain at $413.74 for the FY 94/95 to
cover the current maintenance costs of the district. The tax delinquency represents the
estimated amount of unpaid taxes within the district. No new assessments were annexed into
the district this year.
FY 94/95Assessment Rate:
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit Rate/.
I and Use Type Unit~ Rat~ Factor A.U. Revenue
Industrial Parcel 8 $413.74 1.0 $413.74 $3,310.00
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 21
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 22
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b
(Commercial/Industrial)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
William J. O NelL, City Engineer
R~solution No. 94-088
Page 23
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b
(Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial
Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1,
Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act
of 1972).
Back~ound:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (LMD #3b) represents landscape sites throughout the
Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within
that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly
attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this
district are charged to those parcels within that district.
This fiscal year approximately 22.87 acres of the Adult Sports Complex (this does not include
the Stadium and its parking lots and maintenance building) will be accepted into this district
for maintainance. The Adult Sports Complex with its three softball fields, two soccer fields
and 90 foot combination field all with sports field lighting and bleacher seating was desig'ned
to cater to the adult sports leagues. For this reason the Complex was located in the commercial
and industrial of the City to benefit the adult work force within the area. Detailed
maintenance activities for the Complex to be maintained by the district include but are not
limited to the following:
The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for
the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation,
trimming, spraying, fertilization or treating for disease or injury: the removal of trimmings,
rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance , repair and replacement as
necessary of all irrigation systems, the removal of graffitti from walls immediately
adjacent to the cultivated areas, the maintenance, repair and replacement as necessary of
the parking lot surfacing and striping, parking lot sweeping, the maintenance and repair of
all lighting facilities and the maintenance and repair for restroom facilities.
The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
93/94 94/95
Ground Cover and Shrubs 6.74 6.74
Turf 3.29 3.29
Parks 0.00 22.87
Total Area in LMD #3b 10.03 Acres 32.90Acres
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company.
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 24
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #3b are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #3b are as follows:
Proposed
Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Emergency & Reg. Vehicle & Equipment Rental
Contract Services
Landscape Maintenance -Parkways & Medians
Tree Maintenance
Landscape Maintenance - Sports Complex
Complex Drainage
Capital Expenditures
Controller Cabinet Safety Improvements
Landscape Plant Material Renovations
Haven Median Irrigation Improvements
Calsense Connections to Central
Capita[ Equipment Outlay / Equipment
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Gross Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Total Revenue Required:
$65,360.00
$24,180.00
$28,060.00
$1,030.00
$1,000.00
$162,780.00
$30,000.00
$92,040.00
$15,000.00
$3,200.00
$10,000.00
$7,950.00
$10,000.00
$6,450.00
$5,860.00
$136,000.00
$81.200.00
$680,110.00
$39,150.00
$25.640.00
$64,790.00
$744,9(X].00
<$230.290.00>
$514,610.00
Analysis:
It is recommended that the assessment rate remain at $352.80. for the fiscal year 1994/95. The
tax delinquency represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 25
Unit No. of Assess.
! and Use Type Units Ra~e
Industrial/Comm. Acre 1341.02 $352.80
Other Revenue: User fees from Sports Field Lighting
TOTAL
Unit Rate/
Factor A.U. Revenue
1.0 $352.80 $473,110
$41,500
$514,610
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 26
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 27
Legal Descriptions
Parcel
Being portions of Lot Nos. 20, 21, 22; and portions of the westerly
1/2 and the westerly 300 feet of the easterly 1/2 of Lots 23 and 24
according to the Map of Rochester as per plat recorded in Book 9, Page
20 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San
Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as
follows:
BE6XMMXMG at the northeast corner of the southerly 50.00 feet of the
westerly 300 feet of the easterly 1/2 of said Lot 24 according to said
Map of Rochester; THE!ICE N 00 degrees 09 minutes 28 seconds R along
the easterly line of the westerly 1/2 of the easterly 1/2 of said Lots
24 and 23 a distance of 617.60 feet; THEMCB N 89 degrees 34 minutes 46
seconds E a distance of 276.30; TH~K # 00 degrees 25 minutes 14
seconds a distance of 43.00 feet; THENCE S 80 degrees 34 minutes 46
seconds # a distance of 133.93 feet to a point on a non-tanqent curve
concave southerly, having a radius of 78.00 feet, a radial through
said point bears # 13 degrees 25 minutes 24 seconds #; TIIBICB westerly
along said curve through a central angle of 09 degrees 37 minutes 01
seconds an arc length of 13.09 feet to a point on a tangent curve
concave northerly having a radius of 78.00 feet; ~¥esterly along
said curve through a central angle of 22 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds
an arc length of 30.79 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave
northerly having a radius of 78.00 feet; THBICB westerly along said
curve through a central angle of 22 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds an
arc length of 30.79 feet t o point on a tangent curve concave
northerly having a radius of 310.00 feet; THBIClwesterly along said
curve through a central angle of 15 degrees 30 minutes 43 seconds an
arc length of 83.93 feet to a point on a non-tangent line, a radial
line to said curve; THKIICB N 15 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds E along
said line a distance of 10.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve
concave northeasterly having a radius of 300.00 feet, a radial through
said point bears S 15 degrees 05 minutes 29 seconds #; T!iBICK
northwesterly along saAd curve through a central angle of 25 degrees
05 minutes 21 secondIs an arc length of 131.37 feet to a point on a
tangent line; T!i~ICl # 49 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds # along said
line a distance of 33.50 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve
concave northwesterly having a radius of 368.50 feet a radial through
said point bears S 49 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds E; THBMCB
northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 20 degrees
32 minutes 20 seconds an arc length of 132.10 foot to a point on a
tangent line; THBIICE along said line # 19 degree8 38 minutes 30
seconds E a distance of 131.18 feet; THBMCB H 71 degrees 21 minutes 30
seconds a distance of 46.22 feet; THBIICl H 70 degrees 21 minutes 30
seconds W a distance of 46.22 feet; THBIICB N 19 dogream 38 minutes 30
seconds E a distance of 8.32 feet to a point on a tangent curve
concave southwesterly having a radius of 12.00 feet;
northeasterly northerly and northwesterly along said curve through a
Pmsolution No. 94-088
Page 28
Legal Descriptions (continued)
central angle of 103 degrees 02 minutes 30 seconds an arc length of
21.58 feet to a point on a tangent line; THENCE N 83 degrees 24
minutes 00 seconds W along said line a distance of 2.35 feet; THENC~ S
89 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds W a distance of 201.56 feet; ~ N
85 degrees 05 minutes 12 seconds W a distance of 65.03 feet; THRICE
west a distance of 89.63 feet; THENCE S 45 degrees 00 minutes 00
seconds W a distance of 35.62 feet; TH~E south a distance of 58.38
feet; TH~CE west a distance of 36.00 feet; TH~C~ north a distance of
116.54 feet; THENCE N 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds W a distance of
35.62 feet; THENCE west a distance of 116.54 feet[ T~ north a
distance of 36.00 feet; T~MCH east a distance of 58 38 feet; T~N
45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds E a distance of 35.62 feet; T~E
north a distance of 89.63 feet; T~NMC~ N 04 degrees 54 minutes 48
seconds W a distance of 65.03 feet; ~CE # 00 degree~ 31 ~inutes 30
seconds E a distance of 189.49 feet to a point on a non-tangent cur~e
concave northerly having a radius of 52.50 feet; T~westerly along
said curve through a central angle of 07 degrees 06 minutes 43 seconds
an arc length of 6.52 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave
southwesterly having a radius of 35.50 feet; ~ westerly along
said curve through a central angle of 26 degrees 26 minutes 17 seconds
an arc length of 16.38 feet to a point ~ a curve con, ave
southeasterly having a radius of 2.50 feet, ~ westerly,
southwesterly and southerly along said curve through a central an~le
of 96 degrees 23 minutes 14 seconds an arc length of 4.21 feet to a
point on a tangent line; THENCE S O0 degrees 15 minutes 23 secol~ E
along said line a distance of 16.35 feet; ~ S 89 degrees 44
minutes 37 seconds W a distance of 15.53 feet to a point on a tangent
curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 310.50; T~westerly
and southwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 62
degrees 10 minutes 21 seconds an arc length of 336.93 feet to a point
on a non-tangent line; T~C~ N 62 degrees 20 minutes 12 seconds W
along said line a distance of 83.03 feet to the westerly line of said
Lots 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24; T~ S 00 degrees 09 minutes 59 seconds
W along said line a distance of 1367.79 feet to the northwest corner
of the southerly 50.00 feet of said Lot 24; T~C~ M 89 degrees 28
minutes 07 seconds E along the southerly line of said Lot 24 a
distance of 41.19 feet; T~ M 44 degrees, 28 minutes, 07 seconds E
a distance of 33.94 feet; ~ M 89 degrees, 28 minutes, O? seconds
E a distance of 52.50 feet; ~ N 45 degrees 31 minutes 53 seconds
W a distance of 33.94 feet; TH~C~ N 00 degrees 31 minutes 53 seconds
W a distance of 14.00 feet to a point on a tangent our~e concave
westerly having a radius of 320.50; TH~C~ northerly along said curve
through a central angle of 22 dngrees 26 minutes 59 seconds an arc
length of 125.58 feet to a tangent line; T~ M 22 degrees 58
minutes 52 seconds W along said line a distance of 61.96 feet to a
point on a non-tangent curve concave southerly haying a radiu~ of
62.47 feet; T~Z easterly along said curve through a central angle
35 degrees 52 minutes 13 seconds an arc length of 39.11 feet to a
point on a tangent curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 2.50
Legal Descriptions (continued)
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 29
feet; THENCE easterly, northeasterly and northerly along said curve
through a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds an arc
length of 3.93 feet to a point on atangent line; TH~CB N 00 degrees
3! minutes 53 seconds W along said inea distance of 16.50 feet;
THENCE N 89 degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds g a distance of 420.35 feet
to a point on a tangent curve concave southwesterly having a radius of
20.00 feet; THENCE easterly, southeasterly and southerly along said
curve through a central angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds an
arc length of 31.42 feet to a point on a tangent line; T~BNCI S 00
degrees 3! minutes 53 seconds E along said line a distance of 228.50
feet to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 24; THB~C! N 89
degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds E along said line a distance of 384.02
feet to the TRUB POINT OF BBGIIX~G.
AREA PARCBL 'B' = 996,430.01 Square Feet
or 22.87 Ac~ee
MAP TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
IEXHIBIT "A"! I
~- '""' HIBIT "B"
o ~..
y L ,U, .1 , _~ NO"THERLY
~ B&E DETAIL "C"-- __
EXHIB I I
LINE LOT 20
21
"' PARCEL 'B' 22
0
,-J
_,J
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 30
SEE DETAIL "A"
EYHIBIT "C"
i
SOVT.E,L, L,.E,0T.~ \ ~
{ seal ~ .... 4 d _ o ~ ~ / ~
I~~ ~o~ o ~ /
~~ 24 ~. ~ ~ ~o~o /
.... ,,.,,o,,,
~EA~EMENT FOR STREET HIGHWAY AND RELATED PURPOSE~
PAGE I OF m
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 31
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 32
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT #3B
ANNEXATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95
FEBRUARY 17, 1993
PM 14318 3.47 AC - 3.47 AU
MARCH 17, 1993
CUP 92-19 10.37 AC - 10.37 AU
MARCH 17, 1993
DR 92-07 1.5 AC - 1.5 AU
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 33
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
lANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 313
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 5'
· CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
v..:"~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
(~~. ,j STATE OF CALIFORNIA /~.,.~,
~solution No. 94-088
Page 34
EXHIBIT .&.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 8
STREET I. IGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
10B0'7 JERSEY' BI.VC).
SC;Xt3: S"z
CITY OIr RANCHO CUCAMQN(IA'
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~,,~ ,~., ~
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 35
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6
CITY O1' RANCHO ¢UCAMQN(IA
COUNTY O1' SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~,?~ or
~msolution No. 94-088
Page 36
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 1994 / 95
William J. O Ne~d~i-ty E~gineer
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 37
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
(Terra Vista Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 94395
The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned
Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Back~ound:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD #4) represents landscape sites throughout the
Terra Vista Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district
and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to
those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are
charged to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites in Terra Vista that are maintained by the district consist of
parkways, median islands, street trees, paseos and parks. There is approximateIt 1.25 acres of
parking lot for Milliken Park added to the district this year for maintenance. The breakdown
of maintained areas is as follows:
93/94 94/95
Ground Cover and Shrubs 8.35 8.35
Turf 6.58 6.58
Parks 27.00 28.25
Total Area in LMD #4 41.89 Acres 43.14Acres
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos
are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are
maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD ~ are as follows:
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 38
Proposed
Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Regular Payroll
Part Time Salaries
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Mileage
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental
Contract Services
Landscape Maintenance
Tree Maintenance
Capital Expenditures
Capital Outlay / Projects
Terra Vista / Base Line Median Renovation
ADA Retrofit: Milliken & Coyote Canyon Parks
Capital Outlay / Equipment
Capital Outlay / Vehicles
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal
Gross Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Total Revenue Required:
$168,980.00
$4,650.00
$62,520.00
$42,600.00
$0.00
$30,000.00
$1,000.00
$211,990.00
$7,000.00
$126,930.00
$413,780.00
$90,000.00
$2,300.00
$41,040.00
$5,180.00
$120,00(¢.00
$23,150.00
$1,351,120.00
$82,660.00
$106,440.00
$189,10(1.00
$1,540,220.(./0
<$494,670.00>
$1,045,550.00
For FY 94/95, the district budgeted $90,000 for a A.D.A (American's with Disabilities Act)
retrofit to Milliken and Coyote Canyon Parks. This retrofit will update the play equipment
and surfacing in the tot lots of those parks for A.D.A Compliance. Also Budgeted is $5,0(X) for
exercise station replacement, $7400 for controller cabinet retrofits to meet new code
requirements, $3,730 for Haven Avenue Median irrigation upgrades and $5,0()O for drainage
correction to West Greenway, $95,800 for various renovations and improvements to the parkway
and parks irrigation systems and $10,000 for landscape plant material replacement. Capital
Equipment Outlay of $2,300 is to purchase equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree
Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. Capital Vehicle Outlay of $41,040 to
purchase 65% of a 1.5 ton flat bed truck w/ dump, 50% of a utility truck and 19% of a 4WD
utility vehilce for trails.
Analysis:
Overall budgeted maintenance costs for LMD #4 increased from $1,033,740 in FY 93/94 to
$1,045,550 in FY 94/95. Proposed water usage costs have decreased $10,930 for the upcoming
year, this is due to a combination of water conservation efforts, last year's wet winter and mild
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 39
summer. These factors along with a 93/94 carryover has allowed the recommended assessment
rate to remain constant. In FY 93/94 the assessment rate for LMD #4 was 252.50/A.U. It is
recommended not to increase for the FY 94/95. Attached is the Assessment Rate Computation
Chart.
FY 94/95Assessment Rate:
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Rate/.
! and Use Type Units A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 1659.00 $252.50 $418,900
Multi Parcel 2610.00 $222.00 $579,420
Commercial Acre 122.20 $382.99 $46,800
Vacant Acre 11.44 $37.12 $430
TOTAL $1,045,550
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 40
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 41
Annual Engineers Report
City of .Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
(Tot Lot)
Fiscal Year 1994 / 95
Approved :~,/~ d~.~'~ _/~"~~
William J. O~l~il, City Engineer
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 42
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
(Tot Lot Maintenance District)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance
District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of
the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD #5) represents a landscaped Tot Lot, located on
the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is associated with a group
of 44 single family parcels which all have a common usage of the Tot Lot such that any benefit
derived from the landscaping can be directly attributed to those particular parcels. Because of
this, assessments required for this district are charged to those specific parcels.
There is only one site maintained by the district. It consists of a Tot Lot and a small amount of
shrubs beds and ground cover. The quantities of maintained areas consist of:
Ground Cover and Shrubs
Total Area in LMD #5
92/93 93/94
0.33 0.33
0.33 Acres 0.33 Acres
The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape
maintenance company.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #5 are for direct maintenance of ground cover and
shrubs. These. functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and
testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #5 are as follows:
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 43
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Contract Services
Landscape Maintenance
Capital Expenditures
Mandatory A.D.A Survey for Tot Lot
Irrigation Upgrades to Replace Risers w/Pop Ups
Landscape Material Renovation
Irrigation Upgrades to Central Control
Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrade
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Add: 93/94
Gross Revenue Required:
District Deficit
Total Revenue Required:
$0
$0
$490.00
$70.00
$1,060.00
$0
$0
$0
$0
$200.00
$30.00
$280.00
$130.00
$2,260.0O
$610.00
$90.00
$700.00
$2960.00
$2020.00
$4,980.00
For 94/95 the district budgeted $200.00 for a controller cabinet safety upgrade.
Analysis:
The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $113.29. It is recommended that there be no increase from FY
93/94. No new assessment units have been annexed in the district.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Rate/.
[and Use Type Unit~ Rate Factor A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 44 $113.29 1.0 $113.29 $4,980.00
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 44
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 45
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
(Caryn Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
William J. O~eil, City Engineer
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 46
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6
(Caryn Planned Community)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned
Community ) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division
5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (LMD #6) represents landscape sites throughout the
Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as
such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those
parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged
to those parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites in Caryn that are maintained by the district consist of parkways,
median islands, street trees and paseos. 8.39 acres of maintained landscape area will be
accepted into the district this fiscal year, these areas include portions of Milliken Ave
parkway and median, Banyan Street parkway and various ~andscape areas for Tracts Nos.
13748, 13857 and 13758. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
93/94 94/95
Ground Cover and Shrubs 12.09 19.34
Turf 2.89 3.94
Community Trails 3.00 3.00
Total Area in LMD #6 17.89 Acres 26.28Acres
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos
are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the
Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #6 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #6 are as follows:
R~solution No. 94-088
Page 47
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Emergency & Reg. Vehicle Rental
Contract Services
Landscape Maintenance
Tree Maintenance
Capital Expenditures
Landscape Plant Material Renovation
Capital Outlay/Equipment
Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrades
Tree Replanting
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
Assessment Ad ministration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Gross Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Total Revenue Required:
$35,930.00
$13,290.00
$4,540.00
$1,910.00
$500.00
$160,130.00
$10,500.00
$15,000.00
$1,080.00
$3,000.00
$1,500.00
$2,670.00
$60,000.t)0
$2,550.0O
$312,600.00
$27,000.00
$13,410.00
$40,410.00
$353,010.00
< $64,050.(~)>
$288,960.00
Analysis:
The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $246.97. It is recommended there be no increase from FY
93/94. No new assessment units were annexed in the district. The tax delinquency represents
the projected amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Rate/.
I and Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 1,170.00 $246.97 1.0 $246.97 $288,960.00
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 48
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 49
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
(North Etiwanda)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
Approved: ~ J~'~/~'~/~
William J. O'IN.~, City Engineer
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 50
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7
(Etiwanda North)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.7 (Etiwanda North) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Back~ound:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the
Etiwanda North area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such
any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels
within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those
parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites in the Etiwanda North area that are maintained by the district
consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Community Trails and paseos. The
breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
93/94 94/95
Ground Cover and Shrubs 7.54 7.54
Turf 4.02 4.02
Community Trails 2.00 2.00
Total Area in LMD #7 13.56Acres 13.56 Acres
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, median islands and paseos
are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the
Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew.
Projected Costs~
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #7 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #7 are as follows:
~solutio~No. 94-088
Page 51
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental
Contract Services
Landscape Maintenance
Tree Maintenance
Capital Expenditures
Landscape Plant Material Renovations
Weed Abatement for N.E. Community Park Site
Capital Outlay / Equipment
Controller Cabinet Safety Retrofit
Tree Replantings
Calsense Connections to Central
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Refund i ng Con tingency
Subtotal:
Subtotal:
Gross Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Total Revenue Required:
$2,300.00
$850.00
$3,980.00
$1,330.00
$500.00
$83,500.00
$18,500.00
$10,000.00
$6,000.00
$1,500.00
$1,400.00
$5,5OO.0O
$25,000.00
$1,510.00
$16,000.00
$740.00
$178,610.00
$26,740.00
$204,070.00
$200.0t~).00
$430,810.00
$609,420.00
<$306,050.00>
$303,370.00
For 94/95 the district budgeted $10,000 for landscape plant material renovation and $6,000 for
weed abatement at the Northeast Community Park site. There is $1,500 for equipment
purchases, $1,400 for controller cabinet safety retrofit, $5,500 for tree replantings and $25,000
for calsense connections to central control budgeted for in 94/95. The tax delinquency represents
the projected amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
The refunding contingency in an amount of $200,000 will refund those property owners who are
current on their property taxes a surplus of funds within the district.
Analysis:
The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $307.05 per unit. It is recommended there be no increase from
FY 93/94. There has been only one assessemnt unit annexed to the district. Each single family
property owner will receive a refund of approximately $200 during the FY 94/95. The reason for
this refund is a surplus of funds due to the fact that properties have been annexed into the
district but all of the landscape improvements for those areas have not been completed and as
of yet have not been accepted into the district for maintenance. In future years landscape areas
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 52
within the annexed tracts will come on line and add to the overall maintenance costs of the
distrist.
FY 94/95 Assessment Rate:
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Rate/.
Land Use Type Units Rate Factor A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 988.00 $307.05 1.0 $307.05 $303,370.00
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 53
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 54
Annual Engineers Report
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8
(South Etiwanda)
Fiscal Year 1994/95
William J. CU~eil, City Engineer
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 55
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Annual Engineer's Report
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8
(South Etiwanda Area)
Fiscal Year 94/95
The FY 94/95 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No.8 (South Etiwanda Area) is
prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets
and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972).
Background:
Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (LMD #8) represents landscape sites throughout the
South Etiwanda area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such
any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels
within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those
parcels within that district.
The various landscape sites in the South Etiwanda area that are maintained by the district
consist of parkways, median islands, street trees, Community Trails and paseos. The
breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:
93/94 94/95
Ground Cover and Shrubs 0.23 0.23
Turf 0.06 0.14
Community Trails 0.00 0.00
Total Area in LMD #8 0.29 Acres 0.37 Acres
The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that make up the parkways, are maintained under
contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are
maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew.
Projected Costs:
The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD #8 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover
and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair
and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private
landscape maintenance company.
The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #8 are as follows:
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 56
Proposed Maintenance Budget for 1994/95
Regular Payroll
Fringe Benefits
Maintenance and Operations
Vehicle Maintenance and Operations
Contingency Tree Replacement
Contract Service:
Landscape Maintenance
Tree Maintenance
Capital Expenditures
Plant Material Renovation
Irrigation Upgrades to Central Control
Capital Outlay / Equipment
Landscape Plant Material Replacement
Controller Cabinet Safety Upgrade
General Liability
Water Utilities
Electric Utilities
Subtotal:
Assessment Administration and
General Overhead
Tax Delinquency
Subtotal:
Gross Revenue Required:
Less: 93/94 District Carryover
Total Revenue Required:
$0
$600.00
$370.O0
$0.00
$4,000.00
$6,500.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$2,000.00
$200.00
$150.00
$1,360.00
$80.00
$15,260.00
$1,780.00
$4,150.00
$5,930.00
$21,190.00
<$4.840.00>
$16,350.00
For 94/95 the district budgeted $2,000 for landscape plant material replacement and $200 for
controller cabinet safety upgrade as capital improvement projects. The tax delinquency
represents the projected amount of unpaid taxes within the district.
Analysis:
The FY 94/95 rate of assessment is $151.45. It is recommended there be no increase from FY
93/94. No new assessment units have been annexed in the district.
FY 94/95 Assessr~ent Rate:
The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district:
Unit No. of Rate/.
! and Use Type Uni~ Rat~ Factor A.U. Revenue
Single Family Parcel 108.00 $151.45 1.0 $151.45 $16,350.00
Resolution No. 94-088
Page 57