Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2004/03/17 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive + Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS · Special Public Financing Authority · Redevelopment Agency · Fire Protection District · City Council REGULAR MEETINGS Ist and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 p.m. MARCH 17, 2004 AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member Robert J. Howdyshell ............... Member Donald J. Kurth, M.D ................ Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk ORDER OF BUSINESS 5:30 p.m. Closed Session .................... Tapia Conference Room 7:00 p.m. Public Financing Authority Meeting ....... Council Chambers Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular Fire Protection District Meeting ... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC cR NcHO UGAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at '10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga, ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. ~.~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 1 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY CR-~4CHO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA A. CALL TO ORDER ] 1. Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __, Howdyshell__, Kurth__, and Williams__. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS l 1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition and awards to the winners of the City's "Spay Day USA" coloring contest. 2. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of "American Red Cross Month." C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ] This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS ] This is the time and place for reports to be made by members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda. E. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: February 18, 2004 (Alexander absent) March 3, 2004 (Howdyshell absent) 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. February 26 through March 5, 1 2004, and Payroll ending March 5, 2004, for the total amount of $2,455,275.78. 3. Approve to receive and fiJe current Investment Schedule as of 15 February 29, 2004. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 2 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY ~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE CUCAMONGA 4. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the 21 execution of a contract (CO 04-021) in the amount of $116,666.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Sadie Construction, Inc, of Atwood, California, and authorize the expenditure of a 6% contingency in the amount of $6,999.96 (to equal a total of $123,665.96) for Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 2 from the Capital Reserve Account 1025001-5300. 5. Approval for annual product support and subscription service renewal from the sole-source provider, Oracle, in the amount of $55,524 to be 23 funded from General Fund, Administrative Services Department, Information Systems Division Account 1001209-5300 and 1001209- 5152. 6. Approval of a Map for Parcel Map 15948, located on the north side of 30 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Hartwell Corporation, a California Corporation, owner. RESOLUTION NO. 04-077 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15948 7. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DRC2003-00072, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, 34 between Fourth and Sixth Streets, submitted by Calwest Industrial Properties, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-078 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PROJECT DRC2003-00072 8. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and 37 Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract 16612 located on the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street submitted by D. R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company, Inc. -APN: 227-201-37, 40 and portion of 41. RESOLUTION NO. 04-079 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16612, IMPRO~/EMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 3 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY C~,~CHO HALL, '10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE RESOLUTION NO. 04-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP 16612 9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and 48 Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for DRC2002- 00519, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and the 15 Freeway northbound on ramp, submitted by Fountainhead Delta, LP. RESOLUTION NO. 04-081 51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00519 RESOLUTION NO. 04-082 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR DRC2002-00519 10. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, 60 Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16245, located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Jefferson on Fourth, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 04-083 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 16245, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 4 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY C~NCtlO HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 04-084 64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16245 11. Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for DRC2003- 72 00492, located on the south side of Lemon Avenue, approximately 715 feet west of Haven Avenue, submitted by the William Fox Group, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-085 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2003-00492 12. Approval to accept Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for Traffic Signal Modifications and Striping at Arrow Route and Grove 81 Avenue relating to Tract 16309, a development in the City of Upland. RESOLUTION NO. 04-086 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16309 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension, for Tract 14523, 83 located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, submitted by MBK Homes, Ltd. RESOLUTION NO. 04-087 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14523 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. $ THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CiTY C[~d~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UGAMONGA 14. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension, for Tract 15783, 87 located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street, submitted by G & D Construction, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-088 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15783 15 Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension, for Tract 14498, 91 located on the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Bluegrass Avenue, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 04-089 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14498 16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension, for Tract 15838, 96 located on the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Bluegrass Avenue, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 04-090 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURtTY FOR TRACT 15838 17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Landscape Irrigation, Landscaping Improvements and Street Improvements Bonds, accept 101 a Maintenance Bond and File a Notice of Completion for tmprovements for Tract 15540, submitted by VanDaele Development Corporation, located between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, east of Baker Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 04-091 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15540 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 6 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY [~M~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 18. Approval to accept the Etiwanda Avenue Bike Lane and Sidewalk 105 Improvement, Contract No. 03-047, as complete, approval to appropriate $3,105.54 to Account No. 11763035650/1418176-0 from Measure I fund balance, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $144,046.34. RESOLUTION NO. 04-092 108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ETIWANDA AVENUE BIKE LANE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 03-047, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 19. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 929 1828-34 in 109 the amount of $1571050.00, for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive, Contract No. 01-077. 20. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 14120-2, 111 located on the south side of Banyan Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Carriage Estates, LLC. 21. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 15536, located on the south side of Fifth Avenue, west of Milliken 112 Avenue, submitted by Fairway Palms, LLC. 22. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 8548580 in the 114 amount of $251,050.23, for the Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements from 400' north of Church Street to 500' north of Base Line Road, Contract No. 02-013. 23. Approval to accept Phase 1-A of Community Facilities District 2001- 116 01, Contract No. 02-075 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $6,134,192.46. RESOLUTION NO. 04-093 1 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASE 1-A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001- 01, CONTRACT NO. 02-075 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 24. Approval of financing documents for the issuance of 2004 tax 120 allocation bonds related to the Redevelopment Agency Capital Improvement Program. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 7 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY c[~CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 04-094 123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS 25. Approval of Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's 124 Repor~ and setting of public hearing for May 19, 2004, to levy the annual assessments for fiscal year 2004/2005 for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 04-095 126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 04-096 127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS [NTENSION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND STREET LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 26. Approval of Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's Repot[ and setting of public hearing for May 19, 2004, to levy the 129 annual assessments for fiscal year 2004/2005 for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 04-097 131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, TANDS. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 8 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY cRANcHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 04-098 '132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING AND TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO 27. Approval of Resolutions approving and confirming the Engineer's 134 Reports and setting of the public hearing for May 19, 2004, to levy the annual assessments for fiscal year 2004/2005 for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). No increase of assessment rate is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 04-099 136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 04-100 137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO ~ The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No items submitted. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 9 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE CUGAMONGA II G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 139 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a request to subdivide a 3.33 acre property into 16 single- family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street- APN: 0202-741-64 and 0202-751-36 and 37. Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040. RESOLUTION NO. 04-101 226 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 3.33 ACRES OF LAND INTO 16 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BERYL STREET BETWEEN MIGNONETTE STREET AND CIELITO STREET - APN: 0202-741-64, 0202-751-36 AND 37 II a. PUBLIC HEARINGS I The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items submitted. Il ,. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS [ The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No items submitted. .~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MARCH 17, 2004 - 7:00 P.M. 10 THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY RANCHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE CUC~VlONGA J. cou c. us, , ss I The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES 229 UPDATE K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. L. PU.LIC COMMUNICATIONS ] This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 11, 2004, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. February 18, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, February 18, 2004, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tern Diane Williams. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., and Mayor Pro Tern Diane Williams. Absent was Councilmember: Mayor William J. Alexander Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. II B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) Mayor Pro Tem Williams announced the closed session item. B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF I-15, GARY SAFADY, O&S HOLDINGS, AND JOE O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT - CITY II c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I No communication was made on closed session item. The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. II E. P CESS I The closed session recessed at 6:46 p.m., and reconvened at 9:45 p.m. at the conclusion of the City Council meeting. Closed session adjourned at 10:15 p.m. with no action taken. City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re,qular Meeting II A. CALL TO ORDER I A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, February 18, 2004, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Pro Tem Williams called the meeting to order at 7:23 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Robert J. Howdyshell, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., and Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams. Absent was Councilmember: Mayor William J. Alexander Aisc present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Mike Nelson, Sr. RDA Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Shelly, Information Systems Specialist; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Francie Martindale, Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Fire Chief Dennis Michael and Battalion Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to the American Cancer Society in recognition of "Relay for Life" - a team event to fight cancer. Mayor Pro Tern Williams presented the Proclamation to Faye Visconti, Relay Chair and Cindy Runge, Team Recruitment Chair. B2. Presentation of touch screen voting equipment by the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters. City Clerk, Debra J. Adams, introduced Donna Manning, Chief Deputy Registrar of the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters. Donna Manning, Chief Deputy Registrar of the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters, demonstrated the new equipment to be used beginning with the March 2, 2004 election. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation to the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVVVD) thanking the CVWD Board and staff for the use of their facilities. Mayor Pro Tern Williams presented the Proclamation to Jim Curatalo, Jr., from the Cucamonga Valley Water District Board of Directors. City Council Minutes February18,2004 Page 3 C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS C1. Marjorie Musser-Mikeis referred to item 33, which asks for support for Proposition 57. She continued talking about the State's budget crisis. She asked that Proposition 56 be supported, but to vote no on Proposition 57. C2. Carol Douglas, Alta Loma Riding Club, stated she is very proud because of the sense of community between the City Council, Cucamonga Valley Water District and the Fire Department. She stated Alta Loma Riding Club also strives to be part of this. She wanted to thank the Council for approving an item that was on the Consent Calendar at the February 4 meeting, which was a "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Beryl Community Trail from Hillside Road to north of Almond Street. She thanked them for their support. C3. Leslie Grimes commented on the "Relay for Life" and stated she is willing to help. She wanted to comment on the lawsuit between the Colonies Project developer and the County. She stated she does not understand how they do not understand basic principles of geography and topography. She stated they are building a project in the middle of the Cucamonga Wash and are playing the blame game when they claim they have just become aware of developmental issues relating to flood control. She felt people should ask the County to hold firm on this lawsuit and not settle it because the area needs to remain as flood control. She asked everyone that is listening to write the County and ask them to hold firm. C4. Patricia Carlson asked the Council to consider for a future meeting or establishing a committee to work on the identify of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. She stated she is running into more and more people that are not sure if they are living in Etiwanda, Alta Loma or Cucamonga. She felt we need to keep our history in tact, but that we are one unified City of Rancho Cucamonga. She felt it was time for a fresh look so the zip code is for Rancho Cucamonga. C5. Melanie Ingram, Rosebud, stated there was a newspaper article about Kurth's campaign. She stated he is misleading people by stating that he is running for re-election. She stated neither Mayor Alexander, the Fire Union nor David Grossberg is part of the recall election movement. She stated Diane Williams and Rex Gutierrez had made the decision, behind closed doors, to appoint Kurth and Howdyshell. She also commented that Kurth took campaign contributions from Dan Richards of the Colonies Project. l] a. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS I D1. Councilmember Gutierrez wanted to again thank the Cucamonga Valley Water District for the use of their building. He commented on the American Cancer Society walk to take place at Los Osos High School. He stated he would like to participate. He commented that Max Egington, who is a Boy Scout, was visiting the meeting tonight. He stated he had talked to a constituent about street cleaning and felt signs should be posted indicating when the street will be cleaned. He stated there is concern about some of the street vendors in the South Cucamonga area and that he has had complaints from those residents about this. D2. Councilmember Howdyshell wanted to recognize Eagle Scouts Andrew Acker, Wil Yeager and Cody Ingram and felt they will become community leaders. City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 4 D3. Councilmember Kurth talked about the interfaith forum event that he had attended at Chaffey College in their new building. He commented that Spencer Hutchings is present to work on a Scouting merit badge. D4. Mayor Pro Tern Williams stated she went to a ribbon cutting for State Farm Insurance where they have consolidated some of their offices into one large one in Rancho Cucamonga. She also commented on the Mercury Insurance building and that it is great that some of these big companies are bringing their business to Rancho Cucamonga. [] E. CONSENT CALENDAR ] El. Approval of Minutes: January 21, 2004 February 4, 2004 E2. Approval of Warrants, Register January 28, 2004 through February 9, 2004, and Payroll ending February 9, 2004, for the total amount of $5,970,477.03. E3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 31,2004. E4. Approval to accept and expend grant revenue in the amount of $17,156.16 awarded by the State of California Office of Traffic Safety for sobriety checkpoint ovedime into Fund 370, Account 4740, Expense 5005. E5. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for improvements in Phases lB(B), 3B(A) and 3B(B) of Community Facilities Districts 2001-01 and 2003-01 (to be bid and constructed as one project), including street, storm drain, water facilities, sewer facilities, traffic signal modifications, landscaping and fiber optic conduits on Foothill Blvd. between Rochester Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway, to be funded from Acct. Nos. '16123035650 and 16143035650. RESOLUTION NO. 04-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASES lB(B), 3B(A) AND 3B(B) OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS 2001-01 AND 2003-01, INCLUDING STREET, STORM DRAIN, WATER FACILITIES, SEWER FACILITIES, TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, LANDSCAPING AND FIBER OPTIC CONDUITS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN ROCHESTER AVENUE AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS E6. Approval of Drainage Reimbursements for the General City Area Master Plan for FY 2002/2003 and appropriation of $61,666 to Acct. No. 1112303-5650/1026112-0. ET. Approval to Summarily Vacate the Irrevocable Offer of Parcel "A" of Parcel Map No. 13692, an Offer of Dedication for future public access to Parcel 2, located south of Wilson Avenue and west of Haven Avenue; V-192 -APN: 201-182-34. City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 04-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF PARCEL "A" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13692, AN OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR FUTURE PUBLIC ACCESS TO PARCEL 2, LOCATED SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE AND WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE; V-192 - APN: 201-182-34 E8. Approval of Environmental Assessment and Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01048 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - a request to designate the Pioneer Winery, located at 8812 Haven Avenue, as an Historic Point of Interest in order to allow demolition of all buildings and structures on property - APN: 0209-131-02. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR PRO TEM WILLIAMS RESOLUTION NO. 04-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI'I'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE CUCAMONGA PIONEER WINERY A HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST, LOCATED AT 8812 HAVEN AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0209-131-02 E9. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for DRC2002- 00499, located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Fairway View Place, submitted by KSL Rancho Cucamonga, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 04-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2002- 00499 RESOLUTION NO. 04-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR DRC2002-00499 El0. Approval of Improvement Agreement, improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-00511, located at 8657 and 8661 Pecan Avenue (APN: 229-181-09 and 229-181-12) submitted by Samuel V. DiCarlo and Barbara J. DiCarlo. RESOLUTION NO. 04-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00511 City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 04-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00511 Ell. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-00922, located at the east side of Fairway View Place, south of 6th Street, submitted by Fairway Business Center on Milliken. RESOLUTION NO. 04-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2002- 00922 RESOLUTION NO. 04-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00922 E12. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monument Cash Deposit for Tract 14771, located nor[h of Ringstem Drive, east of Haven Avenue, submitted by Toll Brothers and release of previously submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Cash Monumentation Deposit accepted by City Council on October 15, 1997, from Lauren Development, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 14771 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 15, 1997 E13. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Parcel Map No. 16365 located on the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Regency Realty Group, Inc., - APN: 227-201-44. RESOLUTION NO. 04-036 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16365, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 04-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 16365 E14. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Tract No. 16370, located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Arbor Lane, submitted by Victoria Arbors, LLC - APN: 227-161-46 and 47. RESOLUTION NO. 04-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16370, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 04-039 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP 16370 E15. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security Rider and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract Map 16455, located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and the southbound 1-15 Freeway onramp, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 04-040 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16455, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 04-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16455 E16. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $827,058.40 to the lowest responsible bidder, Mega Way Enterprises (CO 04-011), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $82,705.84, for the Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01, to be funded from CFD 2001-01 funds, Acct. No. 16123035650/1442612-0 and appropriate $909,764.24 (Contract award of $827,058.40 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $82,705.84) to Acct. No. 16123035650/1442612-0 from CFD 2001-01 fund balance. City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 8 E17. Approval of the Lease Agreement (CO 04-012) between San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Etiwanda Railway Station and the Pacific Electric Railway Right of Way. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR PRO TEM WILLIAMS RESOLUTION NO. 04-042 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS (SANBAG) AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE ETIWANDA RAILWAY STATION AND THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY EXTENDING FROM WESTERLY TO EASTERLY CITY LIMITS E18. Approval to execute a Sublease Amendment between the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as sublessee, to assign certain rights to make emergency repairs and construct an emergency generator on property known as the Foothill Family Spods Center, located at 9059 San Bernardino Road. E19. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Banyan Street between Day Creek Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR BANYAN STREET BETWEEN DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE E20. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Day Creek Boulevard Traffic Signals at Vintage Drive, Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DAY CREEK BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT VINTAGE DRIVE, BANYAN STREET AND WILSON AVENUE E21. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Rancho Etiwanda Project (elementary school frontage improvements), located at nodhwest corner of Banyan Street and Bluegrass Avenue, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA PROJECT AND THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS E22. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Rancho Etiwanda Project (street, storm drain and landscape infrastructure), located on both sides of Day Creek Boulevard north of 210 Freeway, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. City Council Minutes February18,2004 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 04-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR RANCHO ETIWANDA PROJECT AND THE STREET, STORM DRAIN AND LANDSCAPE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS E23. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Wilson Avenue Storm Drain Line A-l, located in Wilson Avenue, east of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR WILSON AVENUE STORM DRAIN LINE A-1 E24. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Wilson Avenue Storm Drain Lines "C" and "E", located west of Day Creek Boulevard in Wilson Avenue and north of Tract 14496, submitted by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR WILSON AVENUE STORM DRAIN LINES "C" AND "E" E25. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit, accept a Maintenance Cash Deposit, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for PM 15278, submitted by Plaza Developments, located on 6133 Archibald Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 04-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15278 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E26. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Cash Deposit, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Parcel Map 16037, located at 8585 Comet Street, submitted by Jose and Grace Jimenez. RESOLUTION NO. 04-050 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16037 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E27. Approval to accept Landscape Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Tracts 15711-1 and 15711-2, submitted by RC Homes, LLC, located on the south side of Miller Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues. City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 10 RESOLUTION NO. 04-051 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 15711-1 AND 15711-2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E28. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 15914, submitted by HER 22, LLC, located on Birdsong Place off of Hidden Farm Road, south of Almond, west of Hermosa Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 04-052 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15914 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E29. Approval to accept Improvement, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 16334, submitted by Richmond American Homes, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way. RESOLUTION NO. 04-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16334 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E30. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, No. 6120873, in the amount of $24,245 for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Banyan Street and Fredericksburg Avenue, Contract No. 02-032. E31. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, No. 6120872, in the amount of $33,737 for the Modification of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Carnelian Street and LaVine/La Grande Streets, Contract No. 02-033. E32. Approval to accept the Construction of the Heritage Park Storage Shed, Contract No. 03-045, as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $59,001.20. RESOLUTION NO. 04-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE HERITAGE PARK STORAGE SHED, CONTRACT NO. 03-045 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E33. Approval to accept the Construction of the Milliken Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from 6m Street to 7th Street, Contract No. 03-101, as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond and release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $137,242.57. City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 11 RESOLUTION NO. 04-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE MILLIKEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM 6TM STREET TO 7TH STREET, CONTRACT NO. 03-101, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar with the exception of items E8 and E17. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). DISCUSSION OF ITEM E8. Approval of Environmental Assessment and Historic Point of Interest Designation DRC2003-01048 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - a request to designate the Pioneer Winery, located at 8812 Haven Avenue, as an Historic Point of Interest in order to allow demolition of all buildings and structures on property - APN: 0209-131-02. Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated she has a concern about this and asked that when work is done at this site that the historic flavor be kept. She commented on the Masi Plaza project and stated how wonderful she felt that turned out. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Howdyshell to approve item E8. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). DISCUSSION OF ITEM E17. Approval of the Lease Agreement (CO 04-012) between San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the Etiwanda Railway Station and the Pacific Electric Railway Right of Way. Mayor Pro Tern Williams stated she was aware that some people would like to speak about this item and opened it up for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: Valerie Card stated she is a teacher at Etiwanda Intermediate School. She stated she understands there will be a public garden and offered her students to be part of the planting of the garden. She stated she would be happy to support their help with the planting of the community garden. Bob Curtis, a friend of the Rails to Trails Committee, thanked the Council for this project. He stated he is interested in protecting this station from vandalism. He strongly encouraged the Council's efforts to preserve this station. Councilmember Williams stated vandalism is a huge concern. She hoped that City crews could keep an eye on this and hoped they could store some of their materials there or park their trucks there to hopefully help control the vandalism. MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Kurth to approve item E17. Councilmember Kurth stated he supports Ms. Card's comments about the community garden. Motion carried 3-0-2 (Alexander and Gutierrez absent from vote). City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 12 [I F. CONSENT ORDINANCES I1 No items submitted. II ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS I Gl. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116 - LEWIS EAGLE - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny a change of exterior building material for a 25,622 square foot warehouse in Industrial District, Subarea 13 on a 1.25 acre site, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue - APN: 0229-283-02. Staff report presented by Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner. Mayor Pro Tern Williams opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Lewis Eagle, Developer of the commercial and industrial buildings. He stated he wants to change the building materials from travertine to sandblasted concrete. He stated he wants to build an attractive building. He had a model of what they are proposing with the sandblasted concrete for the Council to see. He added he has not seen any other buildings with the travertine and talked about how costly it is. He felt the sandblasted concrete would be attractive. The architect for the project talked about the model. He also distributed pictures for the Council's consideration. Mr. Eagle talked about the reasons the Planning Commission denied the material he wants to use. He stated it was his understanding there was a project a couple of buildings down from his that has been approved with the sandblasted concrete. Councilmember Howdyshell stated it was his understanding that originally Mr. Eagle submitted the project with travertine and then later changed the material. He stated it was his understanding from talking to a couple of the Planning Commissioners that they had suggested alternative materials other than the travertine and they had expected and are still waiting for Mr. Eagle to come back to design review with an additional proposal. Richard Cartosian, architect, stated they submitted the drawings for the building, but that they were not sure what color to make the glass. He stated they knew they wanted green, but did not know the color of the stripes. He said they knew they would have to submit their final selections to the design review committee. Councilmember Gutierrez asked him about the cost for the materials and if there are a lot of buildings in the City that have the sandblasted concrete. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated yes. He stated the way the building was originally submitted was approved, and then they started making changes. He stated the Planning Commission wants them to finish their changes and submit the plans again for them to approve. Mr. Eagle stated he has driven around and seen a lot of sandblasted concrete on the buildings. Councilmember Kurth stated he does not really understand what the big deal is about this. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated the Planning Commission has not seen a complete proposal that they can look at. City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 13 Councilmember Kurth suggested they bring back samples and plans to the Planning Commission to try to get this resolved. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he agreed with this suggestion. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he hoped the Planning Commission will be sensitive to any business so that a nice design of sandblasted concrete can be used. He stated he did not see anything wrong with using the sandblasted concrete. RESOLUTION NO. 04-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE REQUEST TO CHANGE EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS FROM TRAVERTINE STONE TO HEAVY SANDBLASTED CONCRETE FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2002-00116, A 25,622 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 13), LOCATED AT 9275 CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0229-283-02 James Markman, City Attorney, suggested the Council take no action, but to send this back to the Planning Commission for review and that if it cannot get resolved, this could be brought back to the Council at that time. The Council concurred with the City Attorney's recommendation. No items submitted. I1. APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO THE TIME LIMIT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE TIME LIMIT TO REPAY INDEBTEDNESS OR RECEIVE PROPERTY TAXES PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33354.6 OR ARTICLE 12, AND AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PROVIDE NO TIME LIMIT ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LOANS, ADVANCES AND INDEBTEDNESS PAID FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND OR ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL DEBT IN ORDER TO FULFILL THE AGENCY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING OBLIGATIONS Staff report presented by Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director. Mayor Pro Tern Williams opened the meeting for public input. There being no response, public comments were closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 721. City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 14 ORDINANCE NO. 721 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6 MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Howdyshell to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 721 for the March 3, 2004 meeting. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). 12. APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $193,554 AWARDED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CODE ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM (CEGP) INTO ACCT. NO. 1244000-4740 (GRANT INCOME); AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $155,800 INTO ACCT. NO. 1244302-6604 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - VEHICLES); $17,950 INTO ACCT. NO. 1244302-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - COMPUTER EQUIPMENT); $4,200 INTO ACCT. NO. 1244302-5203 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - CAMERA EQUIPMENT); $5,620 INTO ACCT. NO. 1244302-5285 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - SAFETY GEAR AND EQUIPMENT); $1,200 INTO ACCT. NO. 1244302-5200 (CAPITAL OUTLAY - OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE); AND $8,784 INTO ACCT. NO. 1244302-5300 (CONTRACT SERVICES) FOR TOTAL GRANT EXPENDITURES OF $193,554. Staff report presented by Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor. He also introduced two of his staff, Julie Lobos and Allison Roland, and thanked them for their help with this. MOTION: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Kurth to approve staff's recommendation. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). [] J. COUNCIL BUSINESS 31. PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Councilmember Gutierrez stated he was at the park in northeast Rancho Cucamonga and felt padding was needed on the "little springing rides" for the kids, which would protect them from hitting their heads. ACTION: Report received and filed. J2. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE LOCAL TAXPAYERS AND PUBLIC SAFETY PROTECTION ACT, A STATEWlDE BALLOT INITIATIVE TO REQUIRE VOTER APPROVAL BEFORE STATE GOVERNMENT MAY CONFISCATE LOCAL TAX FUNDS Staff report presented by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III. RESOLUTION NO. 04-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LOCAL TAXPAYERS AND PUBLIC SAFETY PROTECTION ACT, A STATEWlDE BALLOT INITIATIVE TO REQUIRE VOTER APPROVAL BEFORE STATE GOVERNMENT MAY CONFISCATE LOCAL TAX FUNDS City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 15 MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Howdyshell to approve Resolution No. 04-057. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). J3. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROPOSITIONS 57 (THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOND ACT) AND PROPOSITION 58 (THE CALIFORNIA BALANCED BUDGET ACT) ON THE MARCH BALLOT Staff report presented by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III. Councilmember Kurth felt the City needs to support and approve this Resolution. He felt this would move things in the right direction. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has reservations voting for this not knowing if the state will take more revenue away from the City. He hoped measures will be developed to protect local revenue. Councilmember Howdyshell stated he has not heard anything any better than this and will support it. Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated she concurred with everything the Council has already said. RESOLUTION NO. 04-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 57 (THE ECONOMIC RECOVERY BOND ACT) AND PROPOSITION 58 (THE CALIFORNIA BALANCED BUDGET ACT) ON THE MARCH BALLOT MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Howdyshell to approve Resolution No. 04-058. Motion carried 4- 0-1 (Alexander absent). [ K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING [ No items were identified for the next meeting. II ~-PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I L1. REQUEST BY WILLIAM TRUDEAU TO CHANGE CITY'S ROOFING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW HOMEOWNER THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE BETWEEN MULTIPLE TYPES OF ROOFING PRODUCTS. Mr. Trudeau was not present. The item will come back at the March 3, 2004 meeting. L2. John Shanahan stated he is concerned about what is going on in Sacramento and stated he did not agree with the Council's decision to support Proposition 57 and 58. He stated he is really disgusted with this. City Council Minutes February 18, 2004 Page 16 MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Howdyshell to recess to closed session to complete the agenda items. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). The meeting recessed at 9:43 p.m. The closed session adjourned at 10:15 p.m. with no action taken. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * March 3, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES Il ^. CALL TO ORDER I The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, March 3, 2004, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cueamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Absent was Councilmember: Robert J. Howdyshell Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; and Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item. B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WEST OF 1-15, GARY SAFADY, O&S HOLDINGS, AND JOE O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, NEGOTIATING PARTY, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT- CITY II c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No communication was made on the closed session item. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. The closed session recessed at 6:43 p.m. with no action taken. City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting II ^. I A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March 3, 2004, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Absent was Councilmember: Robert J. Howdyshell Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Joe Kamrani, Sr. Information Systems Analyst; Sam Davis, Information Systems Specialist; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Fire Chief Dennis Michael and Battalion Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II; Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II - City Clerk's Office; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B1. Presentation of a Proclamations and Certificates of Recognition to the "Grand Prix Fire" and Recovery Donors and Volunteers. Mayor Alexander, assisted by staff members Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; and Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst II, presented the Proclamations and Certificates of Recognition to representatives from Charley Joint Union High School District, Los Osos High School, Rancho Cucamonga High School, Etiwanda High School, Calvary Chapel, Cucamonga Valley Water District, Target, Subway, Papa John's Pizza and Alta Loma Riding Club. B2. Presentation of Proclamations to the Fontana High School Government Club for their civic education fundraising efforts. Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Gutierrez presented the Proclamations to the Fontana High School Government Club. City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 3 I] C. PLTBLIC COMMLTNICATIONS C1. Earl Anderson thanked the City crews for providing assistance to he and his neighbors on Bella Vista during the recent rainstorm. He felt his neighborhood was once again threatened by flooding. He asked again to get the storm channel extended 600' to protect them from future flooding. He asked the Council and City Engineer to keep on working towards this. C2. John Lyons talked about the elections that occurred Tuesday, March 2. ~. CouNciL COMMUNICATIONS D1. Councilmember Kurth stated he went to one of the fundraisers for the kids from Fontana and talked about how exciting it was. He thanked Councilmember Gutierrez for his work with this project. D2. Councilmember Williams commented on the Etiwanda High School Basketball Team and their win over Lancaster. She stated they are going to play Long Beach Poly for the championship this Saturday. She congratulated them on their accomplishments. D3. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he has been working with some of the neighbors in the South Gucamonga area on the street vendor issue. He stated they are trying to resolve this problem to make everyone happy. He stated he got some complaints about a shed that was being built in the Deer Creek area because it was too large. He asked for people to be good neighbors. He mentioned that people continue to speed on City streets and that it is a problem. He asked people to slow down and obey traffic laws. He stated he has also been working on some problems at the Alta Vista Mobile Home Park with Police Chief Pete Ortiz. He thanked the many people that helped support his class so the kids can go to Washington, D.C. and New York. II E. CONSENT CALENDAR [ El. Approval of Warrants, Register February 10, 2004 through February 25, 2004, and Payroll ending February 25, 2004, for the total amount of $7,842,435.54. E2. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Los Osos High School, to be funded from Acct. No. 11243035650/1415124-0 (Transportation Funds). RESOLUTION NO. 04-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE G[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT LOS OSOS HIGH SCHOOL IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CiTY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 4 E3. Approval for the purchase of two (2) 2004 Ford Explorers from Fritts Ford of Riverside in the amount of $45,256.38; one(l) 2004 Ford Ranger truck from Ramsey Street Ford of Banning in the amount of $12,648.39; and one (1) 2004 Ford F-350 4X4 super cab truck from Raceway Ford of Riverside in the amount of $28,468.09, funded from the Equipment/Vehicle Replacement Fund 1712-001-5604. E4. Approval of a Resolution approving the application for California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Annual Payment by the California Depadment of Conservation Division of Recycling. RESOLUTION NO. 04-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER REDUCTION ANNUAL PAYMENT BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RECYCLING E5. Approval of a request from the Christian Okoye Foundation for a Waiver of Rental Fees for a Free Youth Football/Soccer Clinic at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex (soccer fields) on April 24, 2004. E6. Approval to Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract No. 16279-1, located on the north and south side of Highland Avenues, submitted by Toll Brothers Land Development - APN: 227-051-01, 04-, 05, 06, 09 and 227- 061-05. RESOLUTION NO. 04-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR TRACT MAP 16279-1 ET. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2002-00606, located on the west side of Hermosa Avenue, south of 8th Street and north of 7th Street, submitted by Fairway Business Center on Milliken. RESOLUTION NO. 04-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2002-00606 RESOLUTION NO. 04-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2002-00606 E8. Approval of Map(s), Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map(s) 16123, 16124 and 16125, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south of Arrow Route and on the west side of Monroe Court, cul-de-sac north of Jersey Boulevard. City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 04-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16123, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 04-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16123 RESOLUTION NO. 04-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16124, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 04-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16124 RESOLUTION NO. 04-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16125, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 04-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16125 E9. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 16432, located at the southwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Street, submitted by Cucamonga Ventures, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 04-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16432, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 04-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16432 El0. Approval to award a contract to American Landscape Companies (CO 04-016) for the Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project in the amount of $1,419,799.30, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency to be funded from Park Development Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1343120~0 and 2002 Park Bond Act/Per Capita/RZH Funds Acct. No. 1238303-5650/1343238-0. Ell. Approval for award and execution of Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $162,500.00 to Dan Guerra and Associates (CO 04-017), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $16,250.00 for construction survey and administration services for Phase lB(b), lB(c), lB(d), and lB(e) of CFD 2001-01, to be funded from Fund 612 - CFD 2001-01, Acct. No. 16123035300/1442612-0. E12. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $243,432.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Laird Construction Co., Inc. (CO 04-018), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $24,343.20 for the Local Street Pavement Reconstruction north of 19th Street, east of Haven Avenue, to be funded from Measure "1" funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1377176-0. E13. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $78,868.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Nature Tech Landscaping, Inc. (CO 04~019), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $7,886.80 for the Highland Avenue Landscape Improvements east of Day Creek Boulevard, to be funded from Beautification funds, Acct. No. 1110316565011103165650/1454110-0 from Beautification fund balance. E14. Approval of Reimbursement Agreement for Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities for CUP 00-33 (CO 04-020), located on/1454110-0 and appropriate an add t cna amount of $8 500 00 to Acct. No. the th north s~de of 19 Street between He man Avenue and Amethyst Street, submitted by Hix Development Corporation, URA-019. RESOLUTION NO. 04-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSE-MENT AGREEMENT FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES FOR A PORTION OF 19TM STREET BET~NEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND AMETHYST STREET E15. Approval to increase the scope of the existing Professional Services Agreement to Kleinfelder, Inc., (CO 03-114) to provide additional testing and inspection services for concrete and asphalt materials for the Construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Central Park Senior/Community Center Project in an amount not to exceed $40,000, to be funded from Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1343120-0. E16. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 14494-1, located on the north side of Banyan Street, west of Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by US Home Corporation. City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 04-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14494-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 15902, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street, submitted by US Home Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 04-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15902 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E18. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 16193, submitted by Empire Homes, located on the southeast corner of Hillside Drive and Hermosa Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 04-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16193 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E19. Approval to accept the Banyan Street Widening from Rochester Avenue to 2000' west, Contract No. 03-050 as complete, approval to appropriate $30,756.67 to Acct. No. 11763035650/1407176-0 from Measure "1" fund balance, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $352,600.06. RESOLUTION NO. 04-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BANYAN STREET WIDENING FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 2000' WEST, CONTRACT NO. 03-050 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Howdyshell absent). City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 8 l] F. CONSENT ORDINANCES [ Fl. APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO THE TIME LIMIT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE TIME LIMIT TO REPAY INDEBTEDNESS OR RECEIVE PROPERTY TAXES PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODF SECTION 33354.6 OR ARTICLE 12, AND AMENDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TO PROVIDF NO TIME LIMIT ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LOANS, ADVANCES AND INDEBTEDNESS PAID FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND OR ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL DEBT IN ORDER TO FULFILL THE AGENCY'S AFFORDABLF HOUSING OBLIGATIONS Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 721. ORDINANCE NO. 721 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6 MOTION: Moved by Kurth, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 721. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Howdyshell absent). [[ G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted. [[ H. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted. [1 I. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No items submittad. City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 9 [[ J. COUNCIL BUSINESS I J1. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE - (Oral Report) Councilmember Williams stated last week she, City Manager Jack Lam, Fire Chief Dennis Michael and Management Analyst III Michelle Dawson went to Washington, D.C. to ask our representatives for funding considerations for some projects and programs. She stated one of those projects was the West End Communications Authority (WECA) program. She stated they also asked for homeland security funding, funds for senior transportation and funds for the library technology center. [[ K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. L. PUBLIC ¢OMM IOATIONS L1. REQUEST BY WILLIAM TRUDEAU TO CHANGE CITY'S ROOFING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW HOMEOWNER THE OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE BETWEEN MULTIPLE TYPES OF ROOFING PRODUCTS (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 18, 2004) William Trudeau, 6275 Celestito Avenue stated he went to the City to get information on a new roof because he had roof leaks at his home. He was told the City currently only approves tile roofs. He stated he did not agree with this and that he had a petition from his neighbors that he was submitting for the record, which was in support of asphalt shingle roofs and also the freedom to choose the material you desire for your roof. He stated exceptions to the City's regulations exist at a home on Hidden Farm and a house on the top of Carnelian, which is Sam Maloof's home. Rob Dewart, CertainTeed Roofing Company, had a power point presentation that he gave for the Council. He asked that the City Council allow all types of the asphalt shingles. Mr. Trudeau felt the asphalt shingles would be stronger than tile roofs and there would not be the breakage you have with the tile roofs. He stated the City's standards state if you have a composition roof you can replace it with another composition material. Mayor Alexander asked him what his experience has been with various types of roofing materials while fighting fires as a fire fighter. Mr. Trudeau stated the tile roofs are slippery and there is more breakage with that type. He asked that the Council consider his request and get back to him. Mayor Alexander stated he felt people in the community have the right to choose. He mentioned the Maloof House having the asphalt shingle roof. He felt the City needs to consider the aesthetics and safety. He asked what the code sections were that applied to this. City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 10 Brad Buller, City Planner, stated 17.08.060 and 17.08.090. He stated this states there is no composition roof allowed after February 2001 when this matter was last heard by the Council. Mr. Trudeau felt the code Mr. Buller read was for accessory structures. He stated he did not feel anyone on his street had a problem with composition shingles. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated these code sections are not just for accessory structures. He added any new house in the City has to use tile or imitation tile per the code requirements from 2001. Mayor Alexander stated he does believe in choice, but asked if any of his colleagues would consider this be sent to the Planning Commission to study with a recommendation back to the Council. Councilmember Kurth stated he feels quality is important, but didn't necessarily care what people use. He did not see a problem with someone looking at this that has more experience than he does. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like for the Planning Commission to study this more and then bring back information to the Council. Councilmember Williams stated she doesn't have any problems with looking at it, but felt the flavor or theme of a neighborhood should also be considered. Mayor Alexander asked what happens when someone wants to paint their house pink. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there is no code against this. Councilmember Williams stated the City should not do away with ali of its code and restrictions. Mayor Alexander stated this is his point, if there are not codes against painting your house any color, there should not be codes against the type of roofing materials used. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to explore this. Councilmember Kurth stated he supports choice, but did not want to lower the City's standards. He felt things should be looked at. Mayor Alexander felt the times and materials have changed and that we should not be closed minded about this. Counciimember Kurth commended Mr. Trudeau for his work in bringing this to the Council. Mr. Trudeau stated this is America and people should have the choice. ACTION: Referred to the Planning Commission to further consider with a report to come back to the Council at a future meeting. City Council Minutes March 3, 2004 Page 11 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Kurth to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Howdyshell absent). The meeting adjourned at 9:03 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A~enda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207440 2/26/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 56.48 AP - 00207440 2/26/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 97.83 AP - 00207441 2/26/2004 HIX DEVELOPMENT 53,309.93 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 1,723.42 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 85.87 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 77.46 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 464.25 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 54.08 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 52.04 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 43.78 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 87.80 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 182.33 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 43.67 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 108.90 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 109.17 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 29.69 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 28.68 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/20~4 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 131.45 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 36.94 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 195.18 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 9 !.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 409.08 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 0.16 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 28.68 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 56.57 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 31.38 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 31.43 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 38.71 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 38.71 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 91.39 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP- 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 113.15 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 522.10 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 1 Current Date: 03/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 151.60 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 21.01 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 20.88 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 28.23 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 28.73 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 29.87 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 29.27 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 20.86 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP - 00207443 2/26/2004 VERIZON 90.12 AP - 00207444 2/26/2004 SUNGARD BI TECH INC 1,275.00 AP - 00207445 2/26/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 2,770.04 AP - 00207445 2/26/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 23,545.36 AP - 00207447 2/26/2004 JONES, BOB 2,240.00 AP - 00207448 3/3/2004 AA EQUIFMENT RENTALS CO INC 31 ~37 AP - 00207448 3/3/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 166.61 AP - 00207448 3/3/2004 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 20.41 AP - 00207449 3/3/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 141.43 AP - 00207449 3/3/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 134.78 AP - 00207449 3/3/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 28.61 AP - 00207449 3/3/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 335.71 AP - 00207449 3/3/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 231.92 AP - 00207449 3/3/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 480.92 AP - 00207449 3/3/2004 ABC LOCKSMITHS 302.99 AP - 00207450 3/3/2004 ABLAC 16.39 AP - 00207451 3/3/2004 ABLETRONICS 9.64 AP - 00207453 3/3/2004 AG ENGINEERING INC 558.58 AP - 00207455 3/3/2004 ALL AIR APPLIANCE MASTERS 140.00 AP - 00207457 3/3/2004 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES 456.14 AP - 00207458 3/3/2004 ALTA LOMA RIDING CLUB 4,682.06 AP - 00207460 3/3/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31 AP - 00207460 3/3/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31 AP - 00207460 3/3/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31 AP - 00207460 3/3/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 146.31 AP - 00207460 3/3/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 900.00 AP - 00207460 3/3/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.00 AP - 00207460 3/3/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 187.00 AP - 00207460 3/3/2004 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 179.00 AP - 00207461 3/3/2004 APHRCK LLC 6,550.00 AP - 00207462 3/3/2004 ARLEDGE, MICHELLE 37.50 AP - 00207463 3/3/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 118.14 AP - 00207463 3/3/2004 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION 326.05 AP - 00207464 3/3/2004 ASSI SECURITY 2,340.00 AP ~ 00207465 3/3/2004 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 5,947.50 AP - 00207465 3/3/2004 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 10,757.50 AP - 00207466 3/3/2004 ASSOCIATED GROUP 1,362.50 AP - 00207466 3/3/2004 ASSOCIATED GROUP 60.00 AP- 00207466 3/3/2004 ASSOCIATED GROUP 1,525.22 User: AHAWORTH- Ann H~w~rth - - Page: 2 ........... C~rre~t--~a-t~:-~0~i08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207466 3/3/2004 ASSOCIATED GROUP 60.00 AP - 00207466 3/3/2004 ASSOCIATED GROUP 1,487.50 AP - 00207466 3/3/2004 ASSOCIATED GROUP 60.00 AP - 00207469 3/3/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 90.5 l AP - 00207469 3/3/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 920.67 AP - 00207469 3/3/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 50.75 AP - 00207469 3/3/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 84.17 AP - 00207469 3/3/2004 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE -29.24 AP - 00207470 3/3/2004 BASELINE HARDWARE 29.04 AP - 00207474 3/3/2004 BILL BLANCHARDS LITTLE BIG BAND 400.00 AP - 00207476 3/3/2004 BOCTOR, ALFRED 60.00 AP - 00207477 3/3/2004 BRODART BOOKS 4,955~22 AP - 00207480 3/3/2004 CAFE JUSTICE 1,023.63 AP - 00207481 3/3/2004 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 354.45 AP - 00207482 3/3/2004 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 437.48 AP - 00207483 3/3/2004 CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION SOCIETY 5.00 AP - 00207484 3/3/2004 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 73,866.79 AP - 00207485 3/3/2004 CALSENSE 177.81 AP - 00207485 3/3/2004 CALSENSE 544.17 AP- 00207485 3/3/2004 CALSENSE 177.81 AP - 00207492 3/3/2004 CARL WARREN & COMPANY 146.52 AP - 00207493 3/3/2004 CHEMSEARCH 192.55 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,024.35 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 896.32 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 416.15 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 192.07 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CiNGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 32.01 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 C1NGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,072.56 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 1,063.13 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 134.07 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 33.52 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CiNGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 33.52 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 201.10 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 234.62 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 435.72 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 268.14 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 938.48 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 132.89 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 33.22 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 33.22 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 199.34 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 232.56 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 431.90 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 265.78 AP - 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 930.24 AP 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 128.05 AP 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULARINTERACTIVELP 32.01 AP 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 224.08 AP 00207494 3/3/2004 CINGULAR INTERACTIVE LP 256.09 AP 00207495 3/3/2004 CITY NATIONAL BANK 102,249.26 AP 00207496 3/3/2004 CITY RENTALS 46.33 AP - 00207496 3/3/2004 CITY RENTALS 1,033.72 AP - 00207496 3/3/2004 CITY RENTALS 467.40 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 3 Current Date: 03/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. .Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207496 3/3/2004 CITY RENTALS 372.52 AP ~ 00207496 3/3/2004 CITY RENTALS 97.00 AP - 00207497 3/3/2004 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 580.00 AP - 00207497 3/3/2004 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 9,600.00 AP ~ 00207498 3/3/2004 CLABBY, SANDRA 1,000.00 AP - 00207499 3/3/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 224.76 AP - 00207499 3/3/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 28.71 AP - 00207499 3/3/2004 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 105.72 AP - 00207500 3/3/2004 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 66.68 AP - 00207501 3/3/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 72.25 AP - 00207501 3/3/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 50.85 AP - 00207501 3/3/2004 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 47.60 AP - 00207502 3/3/2004 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ! 354.50 AP - 00207503 3/3/2004 CORONA CLAY COMPANY 525.28 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,037.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT I27.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 152.63 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.43 AP ~ 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.18 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 207.83 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT I31.83 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.58 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.23 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 38.68 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 22.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 677.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,050.33 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 478.33 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 587.23 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 284.73 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 82.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT I45. I3 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.73 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 175.93 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.58 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 71.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.93 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT I41.73 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 294.63 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.53 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 165.93 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.53 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 21.03 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 24.33 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 22.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 140.98 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 500.68 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 663. I3 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.38 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 956.93 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 4 Current Date: 03/08/20£ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:t/. 15:56:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 534.78 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 360.98 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 516.08 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.18 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 204.78 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 448.98 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 394.73 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,375.83 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.23 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 350.73 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 275.93 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 521.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 669.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 519.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 773.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 66.08 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.03 AP - 002075~}6 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.13 AP ~ 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 164.83 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,012.93 AP - 00207506 3/312004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 199.18 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 526.93 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 67.28 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 86.83 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 40.88 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 380.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,063.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 101.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.23 AP ~ 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 168.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 213.23 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.13 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 100.03 AP - 00207506 3/3/20~4 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.03 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,021.73 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 985.33 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.23 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 310.03 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 307.93 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 24.33 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23.23 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 203.43 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 277.03 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 110.18 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 157.23 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 326.53 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 85.98 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 213.33 AP - 00207506 3/3/2004 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 890.83 AP - 00207507 3/3/2004 D 7 CONSULTING INC 1,200.00 AP - 00207508 3/3/2004 DAN GLrERRA AND ASSOCIATES 46,617.50 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 5 Current Date: 03/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207510 3/3/2004 DATA QUICK 93.50 AP - 00207511 3/3/2004 DAWSON, MICHELLE 338.92 AP - 00207512 3/3/2004 DE LEISE, JENAE 519.24 AP - 00207513 3/3/2004 DELTA DENTAL 30,332.84 AP - 00207514 3/3/2004 DEMPSTER, KERI 216.00 AP - 00207515 3/3/2004 DIETERICH POST COMPANY 175.12 AP - 00207516 3/3/2004 DIXON, SHERRY 75.00 AP - 00207518 3/3/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 116.42 AP - 00207518 3/3/2004 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 87.17 AP - 00207519 3/3/2004 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 1,231.31 AP- 00207520 3/3/2004 EMCOR SERVICE 11,122.29 AP - 00207520 3/3/2004 EMCOR SERVICE 8,325.00 AP - 00207521 3/3/2004 EMPIRE HOMES 4,500.00 AP - 00207522 3/3/2004 ESGIL CORPORATION 68,328.00 AP - 00207523 3/3/2004 ESPINOZA, LAURA 75.00 AP - 00207523 3/3/2004 ESPINOZA, LAURA 75.00 AP - 00207523 3/3/2004 ESPINOZA, LAURA 75.00 AP - 00207524 3/3/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 54.27 AP - 00207524 3/3/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 40.51 AP - 00207524 3/3/2004 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 110.39 AP - 00207525 3/3/2004 F Z CONSULTING INC 198.00 AP - 00207526 3/3/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 18.58 AP - 00207526 3/3/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.21 AP - 00207526 3/3/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 19.71 AP - 00207526 3/3/2004 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 12.89 AP - 00207527 3/3/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 868.00 AP - 00207527 3/3/2004 FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES 561.20 AP - 00207528 3/3/2004 FISI-IER SCIENTIFIC 626.47 AP - 00207529 3/3/2004 FLORES,KlM 96.00 AP - 00207530 3/3/2004 FONTANA POLICE DEPARTMENT 11,402.86 AP - 00207532 3/3/2004 FRAUSTO, TERESA 39.00 AP - 00207534 3/3/2004 FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH 2,220.00 AP - 00207536 3/3/2004 GE ENERGY RENTALS 570.00 AP - 00207539 3/3/2004 GO FAMILY 150.00 AP - 00207540 3/3/2004 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 2,500.00 AP - 00207541 3/3/2004 GRAINGER, WW 249.22 AP - 00207541 3/3/2004 GRAINGER, WW 114.19 AP - 00207541 3/3/2004 GRAINGER, WW 20.74 AP - 00207542 3/3/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 32.28 AP - 00207542 3/3/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 107.48 AP - 00207542 3/3/2004 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 34.27 AP - 00207544 3/3/2004 GRUENEICH RESOURCE ADVOCATES 8,074.74 AP - 00207545 3/3/2004 GUARDIAN 2,788.39 AP - 00207546 3/3/2004 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 304.72 AP - 00207546 3/3/2004 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 132.97 AP - 00207546 3/3/2004 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 335.67 AP - 00207546 3/3/2004 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 328.04 AP - 00207547 3/3/2004 HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY 580.09 AP - 00207548 3/3/2004 HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH 2,000.00 AP - 00207549 3/3/2004 HIRCHERT, JENNIFER 165.00 AP - 00207550 3/3/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF 46.61 AP - 00207550 3/3/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF 65.50 AP - 00207550 3/3/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF 140.75 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 6 Current Date: 03/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA PEG PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:, 15:56:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207550 3/3/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF 35.45 AP - 00207550 3/3/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF 103.81 AP - 00207550 3/3/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF 92.44 AP - 00207550 3/3/2004 HOME DEPOT/GECF 20.01 AP - 00207551 3/3/2004 HOSE MAN [NC 43.20 AP - 00207553 3/3/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 33.74 AP - 00207553 3/3/2004 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 19.17 AP - 00207555 3/3/2004 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 376.26 AP - 00207555 3/3/2004 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 197.99 AP - 00207555 3/3/2004 ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS 36.47 AP - 00207556 3/3/2004 INDUSTRIAL FIRE PROTECTION INC 35.13 AP - 00207558 3/3/2004 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY 78.04 AP - 00207559 3/3/2004 INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS 221.00 AP - 00207561 3/3/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 702.24 AP - 00207561 3/3/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 711.56 AP - 00207561 3/3/2004 iNLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 896.84 AP - 00207561 3/3/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 831.22 AP - 00207561 3/3/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 736.92 AP - 00207561 3/3/2004 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION 723.82 AP - 00207563 3/3/2004 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 114.60 AP - 00207563 3/3/2004 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 114.60 AP - 00207563 3/3/2004 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 114.60 AP - 00207564 3/3/2004 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY 527.98 AP - 00207565 3/3/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 273.36 AP - 00207565 3/3/2004 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 20.69 AP - 00207566 3/3/2004 HMENEZ, JOSE & GRACE 3,000.00 AP - 00207567 3/3/2004 JIMENEZ, RAQUELINA 40.00 AP - 00207568 3/3/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 375.00 AP - 00207568 3/3/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 2,187.50 AP - 00207568 3/3/2004 JONES AND MAYER LAW OFFICES OF 1,100.00 AP - 00207569 3/3/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 54,955.80 AP - 00207569 3/3/2004 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN [NC 825.44 AP - 00207570 3/3/2004 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 21.25 AP - 00207571 3/3/2004 KERREY CONSULTING, JULES 210.00 AP - 00207571 3/3/2004 KERREY CONSULTING, JULES 560.00 AP - 00207572 3/3/2004 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES 2,540.00 AP - 00207574 3/3/2004 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES [NC 1,660.00 AP - 00207575 3/3/2004 LAKEWOOD, CITY OF 70.00 AP - 00207576 3/3/2004 LASER LINE 74.95 AP ~ 00207576 3/3/2004 LASER LINE 269.38 AP - 00207577 3/3/2004 LAWN TECH EQUIPMENT COMPANY 500.00 AP - 00207577 3/3/2004 LAWN TECH EQUIPMENT COMPANY 240.89 AP - 00207577 3/3/2004 LAWN TECH EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,000.00 AP - 00207578 3/3/2004 LAWRY'S THE PRIME RIB 1,248.00 AP - 00207579 3/3/2004 LEII~YER, LUKAS 90.00 AP - 00207582 3/3/2004 LOPEZ, ROBERT 60.00 AP - 00207583 3/3/2004 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 144.86 AP - 00207584 3/3/2004 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 29.97 AP - 00207586 3/3/2004 LUNA, ARCELIA 84.00 AP - 00207587 3/3/2004 MARK CHRIS INC 61.42 ' AP - 00207588 3/3/2004 MARSHALL PLUMBING 2,475.00 AP - 00207588 3/3/2004 MARSHALL PLUMBING 77.00 AP - 00207588 3/3/2004 MARSHALL PLUMBING 205.00 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 7 Current Date: 03/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 .Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207589 3/3/2004 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00207590 3/3/2004 MASUCCI, DAVID 350.00 AP - 00207590 3/3/2004 MASUCCI, DAVID 20.00 AP - 00207592 3/3/2004 McCLINTON MATERIALS 856.74 AP - 00207593 3/3/2004 MCKAY, RENATA 39.00 AP - 00207594 3/3/2004 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 110.46 AP - 00207594 3/3/2004 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 418.21 AP - 00207595 3/3/2004 MEZA, RAMONA 200.00 AP - 00207596 3/3/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 72.25 AP - 00207596 3/3/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 289.18 AP - 00207596 3/3/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50 AP - 00207596 3/3/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 181.68 AP - 00207596 3/3/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 144.50 AP - 00207596 3/3/2004 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 289.00 AP - 00207598 3/3/2004 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP INC 145.34 AP - 00207599 3/3/2004 MOFIDI, TRACEY 35.00 AP - 00207600 3/3/2004 MOTOROLA COMMUN AND ELEC INC 109.87 AP - 00207601 3/3/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR 15.52 AP ~ 00207602 3/3/2004 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 397.54 AP - 00207603 3/3/2004 MULBERRY EARLY LEARNING 300.00 AP - 00207603 3/3/2004 MULBERRY EARLY LEARNING 300.00 AP - 00207604 3/3/2004 MURRAY & ASSOCIATES, BOB 3,755.00 AP - 00207605 3/3/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS 37.13 AP - 00207606 3/3/2004 NATIONAL DEFERRED 11,248.99 AP - 00207607 3/3/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00207607 3/3/2004 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEMS 46.28 AP - 00207608 3/3/2004 NJUGUNA, SAMMY 80.00 AP - 00207609 3/3/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 91.59 AP - 00207609 3/3/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 379.82 AP - 00207609 3/3/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 124.94 AP ~ 00207609 3/3/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 84.94 AP ~ 00207609 3/3/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 165.83 AP - 00207609 3/3/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 373.26 AP - 00207609 3/3/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 65.19 AP - 00207609 3/3/2004 O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC 42.24 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 12.67 AP 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 20.88 AP 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 28.94 AP 00207610 313/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 102.25 AP 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPQT 12.45 AP 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 41.33 AP 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 19.38 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 51.90 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 221.70 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 40.88 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 6.24 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 17.13 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 84.13 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 30.70 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 193.94 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 30.17 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 13.79 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 3.40 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 8 Current Date: 03/08/2012 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ 15:56:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 14.13 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 237.05 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 27.22 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 13.16 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 123.52 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 64.53 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -28.90 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 92.54 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 4.59 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT -52.12 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 137.04 AP - 00207610 3/3/2004 OFFICE DEPOT 356.29 AP - 00207611 3/3/2004 OGENA, GUDILLA 200.00 AP - 00207612 3/3/2004 OLTMANS CONSTRUCTION CO 500.00 AP - 00207613 3/3/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 409.00 AP - 00207613 3/3/2004 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 260.00 AP - 00207614 3/3/2004 OTT, LAURA 279.00 AP - 00207614 3/3/2004 OTT, LAURA 85.25 AP - 00207614 3/3/2004 OTT, LAURA 90.00 AP- 00207616 3/3/2004 P AP A 55.00 AP - 00207617 3/3/2004 PARSAC 60,967.00 AP-00207618 3/3/2004 PATEL, VISHNU 8,355.30 AP - 00207620 3/3/2004 PEP BOYS 5.59 AP - 00207621 3/3/2004 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 535.02 AP - 00207622 3/3/2004 PLAZA DEVELOPMENTS 3,400.00 AP - 00207623 3/3/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,226.52 AP - 00207623 3/3/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 5,259.58 AP - 00207623 3/3/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 5,567.15 Ap d 00207623 3/3/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,707.59 AP - 00207624 3/3/2004 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR~ 627.75 AP - 00207624 3/3/2004 POMONA INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHUR~ 546.75 AP - 00207625 3/3/2004 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI 159.14 AP - 00207626 3/3/2004 PORTABLE STORAGE CORP 150.00 AP - 00207627 3/3/2004 POUK AND STEINLE INC. 112,655.10 AP - 00207627 3/3/2004 POUK AND STEINLE INC. -7,669.20 AP - 00207628 3/3/2004 POWER PLUS 25.00 AP - 00207628 3/3/2004 POWER PLUS 25.00 AP - 00207628 3/3/2004 POWER PLUS 25.00 AP - 00207629 3/3/2004 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 6.81 AP - 00207630 3/3/2004 PRESTON, MICHELE 50.00 AP - 00207631 3/3/2004 PRINCIPAL LIFE 14,513.58 AP - 00207632 3/3/2004 PRINCIPAL LIFE 1,466.25 AP - 00207633 3/3/2004 PROJECT SISTER 3,638.42 AP - 00207634 3/3/2004 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 7.00 AP - 00207635 3/3/2004 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00207635 3/3/2004 R H F INC 50.00 AP - 00207636 3/3/2004 RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY 25.00 AP - 00207637 3/3/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME! 50.00 AP - 00207637 3/3/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMME! 15.00 AP - 00207638 3/3/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 500.00 AP - 00207638 3/3/2004 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY YMCA 1,250.00 AP - 00207639 3/3/2004 RANCHO TECHNOLOGY LLC 1,152.00 AP - 00207641 3/3/2004 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 112.65 User: AHA-~ORTH - Ann Hawo~th .... Page.~ 9 ........... -Current Date: ~)3/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:~ 15:56:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207641 3/3/2004 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 2.91 AP - 00207642 3/3/2004 RCPFA 6,305.38 AP - 00207643 3/3/2004 RED WING SHOE STORE 150.00 AP - 00207644 3/3/2004 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 1,056.00 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSItON 21,083.62 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 430.50 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 702.50 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSItON 16.00 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 10,758.17 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,198.62 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,483.90 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 244.80 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 54.40 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 231.60 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 250.00 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,170.00 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,102.50 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 19,368.44 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,991.62 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 3,418.50 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 48.00 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 2,449.10 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 418.37 AP - 00207645 3/3/2004 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 283.51 AP - 00207646 3/3/2004 RIVERA, LORNA 200.00 AP - 00207647 3/3/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 213.87 AP - 00207647 3/3/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 134.15 AP - 00207647 3/3/2004 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 213.87 AP - 00207648 3/3/2004 RMA GROUP 9,842.72 AP - 00207648 3/3/2004 RMA GROUP 3,100.00 . AP - 00207649 3/3/2004 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 69.00 AP - 00207650 3/3/2004 ROTARY CORPORATION 131.32 AP - 00207651 3/3/2004 SAFEWAY INC 1,500.00 AP - 00207652 3/3/2004 SAMS CLUB MEMBERSHIP 60.00 AP - 00207653 3/3/2004 SANCHEZ, MELISSA 28.75 AP - 00207653 3/3/2004 SANCHEZ, MELISSA 22.50 AP - 00207655 3/3/2004 SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC 232,150.00 AP - 00207655 3/3/2004 SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC -23,215.00 AP - 00207656 3/3/2004 SHOETERIA 106.66 AP - 00207658 3/3/2004 SIGN SHOP, THE 62.50 AP - 00207660 3/3/2004 SIGNATURE AUTO COLLISION CENTER 1,607.44 AP - 00207661 3/3/2004 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC 74,189.36 AP - 00207661 3/3/2004 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC -7,418.94 AP 00207662 3/3/2004 SIMPLEX GRINNELL 166.94 AP 00207663 3/3/2004 SLJ PRO AUDIO SERVICES 390.00 AP 00207664 3/3/2004 SMART AND FINAL 38.09 AP 00207664 3/3/2004 SMART AND FINAL 45.95 AP 00207664 3/3/2004 SMART AND FINAL 17.97 AP 00207664 3/3/2004 SMART AND FINAL 43.36 AP 00207665 3/3/2004 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 763.06 AP 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,536.64 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.13 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.48 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 10 Current Date: 03/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time:... 15:56:2 /0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 580.98 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 163.76 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.94 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.77 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.33 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.77 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.97 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.34 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.08 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.79 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.83 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.06 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.94 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.64 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.75 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.53 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.06 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.87 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.98 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.34 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 197.91 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 938.20 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.39 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18.39 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.26 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 150.88 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 619.35 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.04 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.81 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.53 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.24 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10.32 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,096.37 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.04 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.15 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.11 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 142.18 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,772.08 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.45 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.08 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 108.27 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.01 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.54 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.85 User~AHAWORTH~ ~nn H~worth - Page: 11 Current Date: 03/08/20¢ Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2 // CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.51 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.99 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.33 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 136.25 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.95 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.15 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.73 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.00 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.38 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.81 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.95 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.19 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.91 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.65 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.42 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.07 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 166.75 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.27 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.40 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.00 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,051.17 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.19 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.47 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 413.91 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.01 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.86 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 184.80 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.38 AP - 00207670 3~3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.73 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.68 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.45 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.96 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.02 AP ~ 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.36 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.33 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.81 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.96 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.48 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12.90 AP - 00207670 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13.76 AP - 00207671 3/3/2004 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 7,970.67 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 12 Current Date: 03/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2 /2. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207674 3/3/2004 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 269.86 AP - 00207676 3/3/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33 AP - 00207676 3/3/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33 AP - 00207676 3/3/2004 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 708.33 AP - 00207677 3/3/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 237,918.51 AP - 00207677 3/3/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -23,791.85 AP - 00207677 3/3/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC -2,668.78 AP - 00207677 3/3/2004 STEINY AND COIVIPANY INC -2,668.78 AP - 00207677 3/3/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 26,687.80 AP - 00207677 3/3/2004 STEINY AND COMPANY INC 26,687.80 AP - 00207678 3/3/2004 STERICYCLE INC 198.00 AP - 00207679 3/3/2004 STERLING COlqqzE SERVICE 45.75 AP - 00207679 3/3/2004 STERLING COIq~EE SERVICE 115.25 AP - 00207679 3/3/2004 STERLING COI~I~EE SERVICE 321.31 AP - 00207680 3/3/2004 STEVES TOWING AND TRANSPORT 69.00 AP - 00207682 3/3/2004 SUNRISE FORD 33.62 AP - 00207682 3/3/2004 SUNRISE FORD 28.92 AP - 00207683 3/3/2004 SWANK MOTION PICTURE INC 27.13 AP - 00207684 3/3/2004 T AND D INSTALLATIONS 265.18 AP - 00207685 3/3/2004 TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C 202.23 AP - 00207687 3/3/2004 TIME WARNER TELECOM INC 1,282.20 AP- 00207688 3/3/2004 TOMARK SPORTS INC 365.81 AP - 00207689 3/3/2004 TOWERS, LAUREN 30.00 AP - 00207691 3/3/2004 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 4,143.66 AP - 00207692 3/3/2004 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES 156.78 AP - 00207694 3/3/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 6,659.11 AP - 00207694 3/3/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,365.00 AP - 00207694 3/3/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 325.00 AP - 00207694 3/3/2004 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,800.00 AP - 00207695 3/3/2004 UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGY INC. 296.00 AP - 00207697 3/3/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 544.23 AP - 00207697 3/3/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 111.90 AP - 00207697 3/3/2004 UN1FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 21.65 AP - 00207697 3/3/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 52.69 AP - 00207697 3/3/2004 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 35.47 AP - 00207698 3/3/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P~ 2,626.47 AP - 00207698 3/3/2004 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P, 22,324.96 AP - 00207699 3/3/2004 UNITED WAY 49.00 AP - 00207700 3/3/2004 UPS 500.00 AP - 00207701 3/3/2004 UPS 17.47 AP - 00207701 3/3/2004 UPS 22.05 AP - 00207701 3/3/2004 UPS 43.50 AP - 00207702 3/3/2004 US HOME CORPORATION 103.51 AP - 00207703 3/3/2004 VAGABOND INN SACRAMENTO OLD TOWN 282.24 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 59.57 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 29.72 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 23.48 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 28.73 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 20.77 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 23.85 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 21.07 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 28.29 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 278.45 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 13 Current Date: 03/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2 /$ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 2/26/2004 through 3/5/2004 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 32.28 AP - 00207704 3/3/2004 VERIZON 29.52 AP - 00207705 3/3/2004 VERMEER CALIFORNIA 230.63 AP - 00207706 31312004 VIGILANCE, TERRENCE 357.00 AP - 00207707 3/312004 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 6,843.78 AP - 00207708 3/3/2004 WALKER, CHERYL 76.00 AP - 00207710 3/3/2004 WARREN, RUBEN 48.39 AP - 00207711 313/2004 WASTE MANAGEMENT 428.97 AP - 00207711 3/312004 WASTE MANAGEMENT 214.55 AP - 00207712 3/3/2004 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 388.46 AP - 00207714 31312004 WESTERLIN, MERRY 750.00 AP - 00207715 3/3/2004 WHITSON, CLINTON R 100.00 AP - 00207715 3/3/2004 WHITSON, CLINTON R 100.00 AP - 00207715 3/3/2004 WHITSON, CLINTON R 100.00 AP - 00207716 3/3/2004 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 72,677.50 AP - 00207718 3/3/2004 WOODRUFF SPRADLIN AND SMART 4,980.50 AP - 00207719 3/3/2004 WORMDAHL, AMY 100.00 AP - 00207721 3/3/2004 YEE, LARRY 78.00 AP - 00207722 3/3/2004 ZWlSSLER, JAMES 80.00 AP - 00207723 3/4/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 8,226.52 AP - 00207723 3/4/2004 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 5,259.58 Total for Check ID AP: 1,722,979.90 Total for Entity: 1,722,979.90 User: AHAWORTH - Ann Haworth Page: 14 Current Date: 03/08/20C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2 lq City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary February 29, 2004 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM Y'rM Investments Value Value Value Portfoflo Term Maturity 360 Equlv, 365 Equiv. Local Agency Investment Funds 33,783,155.84 33,783,155.84 33,783,155.84 21.09 I 1 1.420 1.440 Cedificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 1,515,000.00 1,523,367.65 1,515,000.00 0.95 733 546 2.150 2.180 Commercial Paper - Discount 5,000,0~0.00 5,000,000.00 4,994,248.61 3.12 41 2 1.011 1.025 Federal Ager~y Issues - Coupon 120,000,000.00 119,984,848.93 119,922,361.25 74.85 1,531 1,231 3.252 3.297 Investments 160,298,155.84 160,291,372.42 160,214,765.70 100.00% 1,155 927 2.786 2.824 Cash and Accrued Interest Passpook/Checkir~ 1,037,697.08 1,037,697.0~ 1,037,697.08 1 1 0.493 0.500 (not included in yield calcofations) Accrued Interest at Purchase 11,434.44 11,434.44 Subtotal 1,049,131.52 1,049,131.52 Total Cash and Investments 161,335,852.92 161,340,503.94 161,263,897.22 1,155 927 2.786 2.824 Total Earnings February 29 Month Ending Fiscal Year TO Date Current Year 383,726.12 2,977,214.66 Average Dally Balance 165,058,924.92 159,349,7g0.55 Effective Rate of Return 2.93% 2.79% I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted March 5, 2003. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained lmm (lDC)-Interactive Data Corporation pricing service. The attached Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents as of the prior month's end is provided under the City official Investment Policy. The provisions of the individual bond dcotJments govern the management of these funds. James C~asurer Portfolio CITY CP Run Date: 03/10~004 - 08:{)1 PM (PRF_PM1) Syfl~Rept V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments February 29, 2004 A~lrage Purchase Stated ~ Days to Maturity CUSIP In~e~-tment # luuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Boo~ Value Rate Moo~s 360 Maturtty Date Local Agency Investment Funds SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 33,783,155.84 33,783,155.84 33,783,155.84 1.440 1.420 1 Subtolal and Average 3~,190,052.39 33,783,155.84 33,783,155~4 33,783,155.84 1.420 1 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank 06050E6Q3 1228 BANK OF AMERICA 08/27/2003 1,515,000.00 1,523,367.65 1,515,000.00 2.150 2.150 546 0~/25/2005 Sul~olal and Average 1~15,000.00 1~515,000.00 1,523,367.65 1,515,000.00 2.150 546 Commercial Paper - Discount 45974MC30 1246 INTERNATIONAL LEASE FINANCE CO 01/22/2004 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,894,248.61 1.010 1.011 2 ~ Subtolal and A~rage 4,994~4~61 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,994~48.61 1.011 2 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 31331LM88 1127 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/07/2002 2,000,000.00 2,021,250.00 2,(X)0,000.O0 8.200 5.129 1,162 31331QTY3 1190 FEDERAL FARM CREDrT BANK 03/12/2003 7,000,000.00 7,013,125.00 7,000,000.00 3.180 3.136 1,106 03/12/2007 31331QK55 1199 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/18/2003 2,500,000.00 2,480,468.75 2,496,875.00 3.120 3.104 1,540 05/19/2008 31331QM79 1205 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 05/03~ 2,0(]0,000.00 1,989,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.210 3.166 1,555 06/03/2008 31331ON78 1207 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 06/09/2003 8,500,000.00 5,457,031.25 5,500,000.00 2.440 2.407 1,103 03/09/2007 31331Q6P7 1224 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 0~ 2,000,000.00 2,0OO,O00.00 2,0(X),000.OO 3.375 3.329 1,435 31331Q7C5 1226 FEDERAL FARM CREDrT BANK 0~/13/2003 3,000,000.00 3,007,500.00 2,995,312.50 3.050 3.049 1,260 08/13/2007 31331TFG1 1231 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 09/24/2003 2,000,000.00 2,016,875.00 1,996,562.50 3.370 3.370 1,3G2 09/24/2007 31331TGY1 1234 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/16/2~ 3,000,000.00 3,015,000.00 3,000,000.00 3.625 3.575 1,324 13/16/2007 31331TGV7 1236 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 3,017,812.50 3,000,000.00 3.010 2.969 1,152 04/27/2007 31331THR5 1241 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/10~2003 2,000,000.00 2,018,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.170 3.127 1,165 05/10/2007 31331TND9 1244 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 12/17/~003 2,000,000.00 2,006,250.00 2,000,000.00 3.970 3.916 1,569 {:]6/17/2008 3133M94J8 01050 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/17/1999 3,000,000.00 3,057,187.50 2,984,531.25 6.230 6.265 1(:~ 06/17/2004 31339X J J4 1210 FEDERAL HONIE LOAN BANK 06/12/2003 5,000,O(X).00 4,968,750.00 5,000,000.00 2.650 2.614 1,197 06/11/2007 31339X~78 1211 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/16/2003 3,000,000.00 2,975,625.00 3,000,000.00 2.430 2.397 1,110 03/16/2007 31339XLB8 1212 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/19/2003 2,000,000.00 1,985,0(]0.00 2,000,000.00 2.625 2.589 1,205 0~19/2007 31339XPL2 1213 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (~ 2,000,000.00 1,963,750.00 2,000,000.00 2.450 2.417 1,304 09~ 31339YHG0 1218 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 07/15/2003 3,000,O00.OO 2,980,312.50 3,000,000.00 2.540 2.5~6 1,141 04/16/2007 3133X05Z8 1225 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 08/13/2003 2,000,000.00 2,001,250.00 2,000,000.00 3.250 3.205 1,260 08/13/2007 3133X1P27 1237 FEDERAL HONIE LOAN BANK 10/27/2003 3,000,000.00 3,037,500.00 3,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 1,701 10/27/2008 3133X3DX8 12~7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/~ 2,000,000.00 2,014,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.355 3.310 1,337 10/29/2007 3133X3E25 1248 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 01/29/2004 2,000,000.00 2,015,625.00 2,000,000.00 3.320 3.275 1,337 10/29/2007 3128XIBD8 1198 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/19/2003 5,000,(]00.00 5,019,125.37 4,993,750.00 3.500 3.479 1,540 05/19/2008 3128X1FG7 1203 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/~ 3,000,000.00 2,991,930.08 3,000,0QO.00 2.5(X:3 2.466 1,002 11/28/2006 Portfolio CITY Run Date: 03/10~'~)04 * 08:01 CP PM (PRF_FM2) SymRef~ V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 3 Portfolio Details - Investments February 29, 2004 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3128X10K0 1204 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 05/28/2(X~ 4,000,000.00 3,997,023.g2 4,000,000.00 3.100 3.058 1,367 11/28/2007 312~X1JD0 1208 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 06/12/2003 51~t ~. ~ 4,946,109.77 4,998,500.00 3.030 2.995 1,563 06/11/2008 3128X1JN8 1209 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 0~/12/2003 2,0~0,000.00 1,971,213.99 2,000,000.00 2.400 2.367 I,lg7 06/11/2007 3128X1L96 1233 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 10/0~/2003 4,0001000.00 4,026,083.98 3,997,600.00 2.800 2.782 930 09/17/2006 3128X12K2 1239 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 11/03/2003 4,000,000.00 4,056,076.05 3,983,125.00 4.010 4.048 1,696 10/22/2008 3128X2GB5 1245 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 12/26~2003 4,000,000.00 3,981,348.27 3,991,480.00 3.550 3.566 1,212 06/26/2007 3136FOAL6 10~5 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 04/04/2001 4,000,000.00 4,025,000.00 3,994,375.00 5.300 5.259 758 03/29/2006 Portfolio CITY CP Run ID~te: 03/10/2004 - ~1:01 PM (PRF_PM2) Sy~Rep~ V6.21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Page 4 Portfolio Details - Cash February 29, 2004 Portfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management P. ge 5 Activity By Type February 1,2004 through February 29, 2004 Beginning Stated Transaction Purchases Redemptions Ending Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary} SYS00005 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 1.440 7,500,000.00 5,8~0,000.00 Savings/Miscellaneous Accounts (Monthly Summary) SYSO0180 00180 BANK OF AMERICA 0.500 229,021.35 0.00 Certificates of Deposit/Neg. - Bank Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Podfolio CITY CP City of Rancho Cucamonga Summary of Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents For the Month Ended January 31, 2004 Trustee and/or Purchase Maturity Cost Bond Issue Pavina Aaent Account Name Investment Date Date Yield Value Assessment District No 93-1 US Bank Imprvmnt Fund First American Treasury Obligation 6/4/1907 N/A* 0.44% $ 257,311.76 Masi Plaza Imprvmnt Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Reserve Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A* 0.44% 242,969.72 Reserve Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemp. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 8/4/1997 N/A 0.40% 500.59 Redemp. Fund Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 500,782.09 PFA RFDG Rev Bonds series US Bank Expense Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% $ 0.04 Cash N/A N/A N/A 1999 A (Sr) & 1999 B (Subord) Sub Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.44% 581,605.19 Cash N/A N/A N/A Sr. Resrv. Fund First American Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.44% 1,092,615,84 Cash N/A N/A N/A Redemption Fund FirstAmerican Treasury Obligation 7/1/1999 N/A* 0.00% Cash N/A N/A N/A Revenue Fund First American Treasury Obligation 3/2/2000 N/A* 0.00% 0.79 Cash N/A N/A N/A Residual Fund First American Treasury Obligation 1/16/2001 N/A* 0.45% 60,394.45 Cash N/A N/A N/A $ 1,734,616.31 TOTAL CASH AND INVES'IMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS $ 2,235,398.40 * Note: These investments are money market accounts which have no stated maturity date as they may be liquidated upon demand. ~ i:[financetCash with Fiscal Agents.xls 2/10/2004 1;29 PM R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E N GIN E E RING D E P A R T M E N T Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council I~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Gary Varney, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJ-FL-~: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $116,666.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SADIE CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED OF ATWOOD, CALIFORNIA, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 6% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,999.96 (TO EQUAL A TOTAL OF $123,665.96) FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 2 FROM THE CAPITAL RESERVE ACCOUNT 1025001-5300 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, award and authorize thc execution of a contract in the amount of $116,666.00 to the apparent low bidder, Sadie Construction Incorporated of Atwood, California, and authorize the expenditure of a 6% contingency in thc amount of $6,999.96 (to equal a total of $123,665.96) for Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 2 from the Capital Reserve account 1025001-5300 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Bids for the subject project were solicited per previous Council action and were opened in the office of the City Clerk at 2:00 P.M. on Wednesday, February 4, 2004 (sec attached Bid Summary). Thc funding for this project was approved in the FY 03-04 budget for $124,000. Staff has reviewed all bid documents and found Sadie Construction Incorporated to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. The project specifications were bid as a standard Public Works contract for the second (and final) phase replacement of the old County box blade signs that are no longer reflective. Bids include 707 six inch street name signs and 540 nine inch street name signs to be placed at 624 locations. Thc bid work sheets required bidders to submit unit prices for six specific configurations of sign mounting in accordance with City standard drawings and bid totals were based on thc sum of those specific unit prices. This project will upgrade the size and visibility of the City's street name signs to aid thc general public, service providers and emergency responders in navigating throughout the City. Resp, ec~l~y pub~rn3tted, F1 Willi~(/(~ City Engineer WJO:GV:dlw 2/ BID SUMMARY CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT~ PHASE 2 / FEBRUARY 2004 Bidder's Name Total Bid C-18 Inc. 133,492.00 Sadie Construction, Inc. 116,666.00 * Sadie Construction, Inc. apparent low responsive, responsible bidder T H E C I T Y 0 F ]~AN C H 0 C U CAH 0 N C;A Memorandum DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Robert Bowery, Information Systems Manager ,,f~,~,d~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR ANNUAL PRODUCT SUPPORT AND SERVICE RENEWAL FROM THE PROVlDER~ ORACLE CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,524 TO BE FUNDED FROM GENERAL FUND, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT, INFORMATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 1001-209-5300 AND 1001-209- 5152 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the annual product license support and service renewal between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Oracle Corporation in the amount of $55,524 to be funded from General Fund, Administrative Services Department, Information Systems Division 1001-209-5300 and 1001-209-5152. BACKGROUND In 1996, City Council approved the pumhase of Oracle enterprise database management system. This selection positioned Oracle as a cornerstone element of the City's emerging technology infrastructure and in essence committed the City to a long-term relationship. Annually the City is required to renew its subscription With the Oracle Corporation for its operating license and technical support. Oracle was, and continues to be, the dominant database operating system for most municipal organizations. It remains the dominant database system due to its versatility, reliability, and ongoing development that allows the City to continue adding applications to improve its technological base. Oracle is the foundational database operating system for the City's financial (IFAS), permit management (Tidemark), registration (CLASS), and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications. Page 2 March 17, 2004 Staff Report for Annual Product Suppod and Subscription Service Renewal with Oracle Corporation With the software operating system, the annual support and subscription service with Oracle guarantees the City will remain in compliance with software licensing requirements pursuant to protection of copyrights and ensures the availability of ongoing technical support. This support agreement covers the period of May 24, 2004 through May 23, 2005. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director ORACLE Pebruary 10, 2004 Customer Contact Tel 909-477-2700 E Fax 909-477-2849 Email lphong@ci.rancho-cucamonga LORRAINE PHONG CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY HALLPO# 0471391050~ CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91729 Re: Support Renewal# 249384 Dear Lorraine, Please find attached a quotation for the above support renewal. The support benefits and services you are receiving will expire on 23-MAY-04. This quotation is provided pursuant to the terms and conditions of the license agreement that you executed when you acquired your licenses. In order to renew this support and to ensure that there is no interruption to your - technical support service, please fax your purchase order or other acceptable form of payment covering the renewal amount as detailed on the attached quotation, to my attention, before 24-APR-04. Please note that if your support is not renewed by the expiration date above, you may be subject to ou~ reinstatement rules as contained in our Technical Support Policies. If the pre-tax value of this renewal is $2,000.00 or less, pre-payment in the form of a check or credit card must be received. Purchase orders are no longer accepted for these transactions. Your purchase order must include the following: Support Renewal 249384 Term of Support 24-MAY-04 and 23-MAY-05 Local Tax Applicable tax will be included on your invoice. If your company is tax-exempt, a copy of your tax exemption certificate must be included with your purchase order. Unless otherwise specified in your ordering document, all fees payable to Oracle are due within 30 days from the invoice date. Oracle's technical support policies govern the terms of your technical support and are subject to change. The most current technical support policies can be found on the web at http://www.oracle.com/support. Also, as we start providing more information and notices via email, it is important that you provide updated email information to ensure that you will receive all communication and notices from us. 25 I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continued business with Oracle. If you require further information, Dlease do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. Regards, Jodee Whitby jodee.whitby@oracle.com Tel : 916 315 6823 Fax : 916-315-5657 Oracle Support Services THIS QUOTATION IS VALID FOR SIXTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE. Special Instructions : OI ACL E Page 2 of 4 Oracle Support Renewal Date : February 10, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Support Renewal # 249384 LORRAINE PHONG Tel 909-477-2700 Extn 2565 Fax 909-477-2849 Service Level: Product Support Start Date: 24-MAY-2004 End Date: 23-MA¥-2005 Name System # Of Pricin~ License Qty Final Price Name Users Type Level Programmer - Named 3235523 5 FULL USE I 2,364.00 User Multi Server Oracle Database 3235523 140 FULL USE 1 4,410.00 Enterprise Edition - Named User Multi Server Oracle Database 3235523 140 FULL USE 1 5,145.00 Enterprise Edition - Named User Multi Server Oracle Database 3235523 1000 FULL USE 1 4,900.00 Enterprise Edition - Universal Power Unit Subtotal: 16,819.00 I service Level: Software Updates Start Date: 24-MAY-2004 End Date: 23-MAY-2005 Name System # Of Pricin~ License Qty Final Price Name Users Type Level Oracle Database 3235523 140 FULL USE 1 9,450.00 Enterprise Edition - Named User Multi Server Oracle Database 3235523 140 FULL USE i 11,025.00 Enterprise Edition - Named User Multi / ORACL Page 3 of 4 Oracle Support Renewal Date : February 10, 2004 Name System # Of Pricing License Qty Final Price Name Users Type Level Server Oracle Database 3235523 1000 FULL USE 1 10,500.00 Enterprise Edition - Universal Power Unit Programmer - Named 3235523 5 FULL USE I 4,946.00 User Multi Server Subtotal: 35,921.00 52,740.00 Total Amount~ Plus Applicable Tax / ORACLE'' Customer Details Please verify and update the following information to enable us to provide an efficient and timely service to your company. Company Name : CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA For Quotation Contact : LORRAINE PNONG Address : CITY ~L~LLPO# 04?13910500 CIVIC CENTER DRI~r~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91729 US Tel : 909-477-2700 E Fax : 909-477-2849 eMa±l : lphong@ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us For Invoice Contact : DEPARTMENT, FINANCE Address : 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE P~NCNO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 Phone Fax email Hot News : Premium Support - Oracle Support Services is announcing the consolidation of its enhanced, customized services into a simple and rich menu of Premium Support Services designed to maximize the flexibility of solutions available to our customers running even more complex systems. Visit http://w~w.oracle.com/support/ today to find out more about these exciting services! OracleMetaLink - Register for Oracle~s premier Web-based support service, MetaLink. FREE for all customers with active support service contracts! You will find technical bulletins, problem/solution articles, installation assistance and much more! Register today at http://metalink.oracle.com/ Oracle Support Web Site - Be sure to browse Oracle~s Support Web Site at http://www.oracle.com/support/ where your can find many helpful support resources. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~, N G I N l~ E I~ 1 N G D E PA ~ Tlq I~N T StaffRe rt DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineering SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A MAP, FOR PARCEL MAP 15948, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 6TM STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY HARTWELL CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, OWNER RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving PM15948 and authorize the City Engineer to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 15948, located on the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue in General Industrial District (Subarea 4), was approved by the Planning Commission on August 13, 2003 for the division of 10 acres into two (2) parcels. Parcel 1 is already developed. Public improvements will be constructed at the time Parcel 2 develops. Respectfully submitted, Wil 'i~ J. O Neil City Engineer W JO:MB:th Attachments: Vicinity Map Parcel Map Exhibit Resolution N.T.S. Parcel Map 15948 City of Rancho Cucamon.qa PARCEL MAP NO. 1,~94~ LOT I 2 '~'"'".'"~'"~"'":"'"~",~ L~T'- 1 1 E. 1/2, SEC. 14, I LOT 15 I LOT 14 T. I S., I R. 7 W. 2.55 ~RES CROSS ~ -~1~. ~ 7.53 ACRES ~ ~x~ ~:~{" ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~SOLUTION No. & q' ~ 7 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CItY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NU~ER 15948 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 15948, submitted by Hartwell Corporation, and consisting of two (2) parcels, located on the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue being a division of 10 acres was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on August 13, 2003, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15948 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map: and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the street delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, the final map for said Parcel Map No. 15948 is hereby approved, but the offer of dedication delineated thereon is rejected, and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ NC-IN E E D IN C D E DAD TIll E N T Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cam Amos, Contract Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2003-00072, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS, SUBMITTED BY CALWEST INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, LLC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security for project DRC2003-00072 and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The expansion and infill of the existing Crescent Business Center, on the east side of Archibald Avenue, between Fourth and Sixth Streets in the General Industrial District (Subareas 4 and 5), was approved by the Planning Commission on June 25, 2003. This project, DRC2003-00072, is for seven (7) industrial buildings on 10.0 acres of land. The developer, CalWest Industrial Properties, LLC, is submitting an agreement and letter of credit (with a combined amount) to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance $ 23,900.00 Labor and Material $ 11,950.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. Resp~fully submitted, Willi'l~n J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WV:dlw Attachments 6TH STREET ~ i FDOI~ER wAY' I Z < LOCATION ~ CRgSCENT = L CENTER DR. ~ (PARCEL MAP 7012) IJ.I -l- A E, 4TH STREET r~ )- 2:) W Z Z m NORTH VICIMTY, MAP NOT TO SCALE CITY OF ITgM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TIT~,~.~-P~C 2 d)C) '~- C)~OTZ RNGINRRRING DIVISION RXI-ITR1T: RESOLUTION NO. ~J 'q' ~) 7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALII~ORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PROJECT DRC2003-00072. WHEREAS, a Development Review, Project DRC2003-00072, submitted by Calwest Industrial Properties, LLC, and consisting of the expansion and infill of the existing Crescent Business Center, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, between Fourth and Sixth Streets in the General Industrial District (Subareas 4 and 5), was approved by the Planning Commission on June 25, 2003; and WHEREAS, Lot Line Adjustment No. 571 has been recorded by the County of San Bemardino; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Project by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Security by Calwest Industrial Properties, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest hereto and cause said agreements to record. R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ]~ N GIN E E DING DI~PADTHE NT StaffRe rt DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT NO. 16612, LOCATED ON THE SOUTITWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET, SUBMITTED BY D.R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. - APN: 227- 201-37,40 AND PORTION OF 41 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 16612 accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the maintenance annexations and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract NoA6612 located on the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street was approved by the Planning Conumssion on November 12, 2003, for the development of 186 condominium units on a one-lot subdivision. The Developer, D.R. Horton is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 16612 - D. R. HORTON March 17, 2004 Page 2 Faithful Performance Bond $246,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $123,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office Respectfully submitted, William. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS:th RESOL IO ,NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16612, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WHEREAS, Tract Map 16612 submitted by D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company Inc, a California Corporation and consisting of 186 condominium units located at the southwest comer of Day Creek Blvd and Church Street was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 12, 2003 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16612 is the final map of Tentative Tract Map No. 16612; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by D.R. Horton Los Angeles Holding Company Inc, a California Corporation, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, TI:IEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Tract Map No. 16612 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. SO U ON NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR TRACT MAP 16612 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 2, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article xmD of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 16612 -D.R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COiV]PANY, INC. March 17, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments, proposed to be, levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed Thc Owner of the Property is: D.R. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. The legal description of the Property is: BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 14, 16 AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 17, OF PARCEL MAP 15641 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (RESIDENTIAL) Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LIVID #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this disthct benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the South Etiwanda area. Exhibit "B" Continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004) For Project: TR 16612 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 SLD # 3 Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 2 54 *Existing items installed with original project B-2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Physical Assessment # of Rate Per Units Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5060 1.00 5060 $422.00 $2,177,520.00 Multi- Unit 124 1.00 124 $422.00 $52,328.00 Family Comm/Ind. Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $422.00 $37,287.92 Vacant Acre 337.97 0.25 84.4925 $422.00 $35,655.84 TOTAL $2,302,791.76 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16612 is: 186 Pamels x I A.U. Factor x $422.00 Rate Per A.U. = $78,492 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l~and ll~e llnit Tvn~ li.nit~ l]'nit~ Factor ti'nits II.nit Revenu~ Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Family Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Family Commercial Acm 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TRACT 16612) is: 186 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $ 3,305.22 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" Continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the Fiscal Year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5160 1.00 5160 $47.15 $243,294.00 Multi-Family Unit 124 1.00 124 $47.15 $5,84660 Commemial Acre 44.18 2.00 88.36 $47.15 $4,166.17 Vacant 10.95 2.0 21.90 $47.15 $1,032.59 TOTAL $254,339.36 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property is (TR 16612): 186 units x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $8,769.90 Annual Assessment 1~ A N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: Mamh 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR DRC2002-00519, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND THE 1-15 FREEWAY NORTH BOUND ON-RAMP, SUBMIT-rED BY FOUNTAINHEAD DELTA, LP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving DRC2002-00519, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 8, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2002-00519, in the Regional Related Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway north bound on-ramp, was approved by the Planning Commission on March 26, 2003. This project is for the construction of a two tenant 2800 square- foot building with a drive thru on 0.42 acre of land. The Developer, Fountainhead Delta, LP, is submitting an agreement and securities to guarantee the completion of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Pedormance Cash Bond $ 36,400.00 Labor and Material Cash Bond $18,200.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2002-00519 - FOUNTAINHEAD DELTA, LP March 17, 2004 Page 2 A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office· The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office· Respectfully submitted, Willi ' ii City Engineer WJO:WV:tch Attachments BASE LINE RD. / MILLER ~: BLVD. FOOT W RT. N CITY OF ~: ~~~~- RANCHO CUCAMONGA T'm'z.~.: V/CY~v'Y .Y'~,~/~iP ~G~~G D~ON ~D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2002-00519. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 17, 2004, by Fountainhead Delta, LP, as Developer, for the improvement of the public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway north bound on-ramp; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows 1. That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor is 'authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. I~)Z¥- ~ ~" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 FOR DRC2002-00519 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 9, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XTIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIlD") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Temtory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and 5'2. RESOLUTION NO. DRC2002-00519 - FOUNTAINHEAD DELTA, LP, March 3, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIlID applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments, proposed to be, levied on each pamel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determaned in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Ten-itory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. 53' Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: FOUNTAINHEAD DELTA, LP, The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF ETIWANDA CACTUS ACRES, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON 1711~E IN BOOK 19 OF MAPS, PAGE 63, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT "F" OF SAID TRACT; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BLOCK 11 OF SAID BLOCK; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE AND ITS NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF LOTS 1 TO 10, IN BLOCKS 5 AND 11, OF SAID TRACT, TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT "A" TO THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "F" ; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT "F" AND ITS NORTHERLY PROLONGATION TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THERE FROM THE NORTHERLY 15 FEET OF SAID LOT "A". ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THE SOUTH 20 FEET OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY DEED RECORDED MARCH 11, 1930 IN BOOK 594, PAGE 292, IN THE CITY OF AND OTHER DEEDS OF RECORD. ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 8, 1972 IN BOOK 7994, PAGE 229, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION INCLUDED WITHIN PARCEL MAP 7966 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 86, PAGES 1 THROUGH 3 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. EXHIBIT "A -~ # ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 9 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 MILLER PROJECT F.O 0 TH I.L L BOULEVARD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (LIVID//9) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ! (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. I (SLMD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLMD #8) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on locai street within the South Etiwanda area. Exhibit "B" Continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003~2004) For Project: DRC2002-00519 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLMD 4/1 1 SLMD 4/8 Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD#9 4 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 8 L 9 0.42 0.84 0.84 0.84 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Physical Assessment # of Rate Per Units Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Single Parcel 5060 1.00 5060 $422.00 $2,177,520.00 Family The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00519) is: 0.42 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $375.91 Rate Per A.U. = $315.76 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I.and llse Unit Tvr~e lInit~ llnits Factnr [lnits Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Unit 7,402 1.00 7402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Family Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2002-00519) is: 0.42 Acre x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $14.93 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $193.75 for the Fiscal Year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda): Exhibit "C" Continued # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 497 1.00 497 $193.75 $96,293.75 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Propei~y is (DRC2002-00519): 0.42 Acre x 2.0 A.U. Factor x $193.75 Rate Per A.U. = $162.75 Annual Assessment R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT Staff Relmrt DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16245, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TM STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY JEFFERSON AT FOURTH, L.P. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 16245, accepting the subject agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 16245, located at the northwest comer of 4th Street and Milliken Avenue in the Mixed Use District of the Rancho Cucamonga, Subarea 18 Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2003. This project is for a subdivision of 2 parcels on 23.56 acres of land. The Developer, Jefferson at Fourth, L.P., is submitting an agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP 16245 March 17, 2004 Page 2 Public Improvements 4th St. Storm Drain Improvements Faithful Performance Bond $1,054,800.00 $ 380,800.00 Labor and Material Bond $ 527,400.00 $190,400.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,500.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DIVISION Wi~m~J.?~O'Neil~~ City Engineer WJO:WV:tch Attachments ARROW ROUTE / ~ PRO LOCATION 4TH ST. INLAND EMPIRE BLVD. L~ SAN BERNARDINO (10) FREEWAY N CITY OF ~:~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITI~~ ENGII~.ERING DIVI~ON A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16245, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, Rv[PROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 16245, submitted by Jefferson at Fourth, L.P., and consisting of a subdivision of 23.56 acres of land into 2 parcels, located at the northwest comer of 4~h Street and Miliken, in the Mixed Use District of the Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 12, 2003; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16245 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Park Place Rancho Cucamonga, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Parcel Map No. 16245 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAI.II~ORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16245 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XlllD of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XI~ID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP 16245 - JEFFERSON AT FOURTH, L.P., March 3, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XlllD applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated heroin by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals am all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments, proposed to be, levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: AIl future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: JEFFERSON AT FOURTH, L.P., The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14647, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 177 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE(S) 90 TO 96, INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; AS AMENDED BY CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED OCTOBER 25, 1995, INSTRUMENT NO. 95-369354, OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PARCEL NOS. 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL MAP 16245) EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AN ~) I ' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND I~1 PROJECT ' LOC^lION 4TH ST. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NO.T~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commemial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Exhibit "B" Continued LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD gl) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004) For Project: PM 16245 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD# 1 SLD # 6 14 Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 3B LMD # 1 29 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU or Acres ] S 1 S 6 L 1 L 3B 467 Units] 233.50 4.22 Acres 8.44 4.22 4.22 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $422.00 for the fiscal year2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Physical Assessment # of Rate Per Units Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Unit Revenue Corem/Ind. Acre 2,115.92 1.0 2,115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 16245) is: 4.22 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $1,488.82 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment l.and llse Hnit Tyne Hnils Nnit~ Factor llnit~ llnit Revenne Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131',533.54 Commercial Acm 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Parcel 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 16245)is: 4.22 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $149.98 Annual Assessment 467 Multi-Family Units x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $8,298.59 Annual Assessment Exhibit C Continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 1,994.74 1.00 1,994.74 $51.40 $102,529.64 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 16245) is: 4.22 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $216.91 Annual Assessment LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2002/03. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of Physical # of Rate Per Units Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 7699 1.0 7699 $92.21 $709,924.79 Multi- Parcel 7091 0.5 3545.5 $92.21 $326,930.56 Family Corem/Ind. Parcel 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $1,037,039.77 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 16245) is: 467 Multi-Family units x 0.5 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $21,531.04 Annual Assessment R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~ ~* ...... I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Rene Guerrero, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ! AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2003-00492, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE LEMON AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 715 FEET WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY THE WILLIAM FOX GROUP, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2003-00492, located on the south side of Lemon Avenue, approximately 715 feet west of Haven Avenue, was approved by the City Planner on October 29, 2003 for the development of a 12,768 square foot building on 1.29 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commercial District. The estimated cost of the required public improvements is less than $5,000.00 and does not require an agreement or security. Said improvements will be noted on the building permit hard card and shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to occupancy. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGI~ERING DIVISION Willi~J. O'Neil ~ City Engineer WJO:RG:tch Attachments 7~ Iq'TH VICINITY ~AF~ CITY OF ITEM: I>,ZC 2 00 ~ - o04q,z RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: V[C. IMIT-'Y' ?'gAP ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTA1N TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR DRC2003-00492 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the fight of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XI/ID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and '7¢ RESOLUTION NO. DRC2003-00492 March 4, 2004 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIllD applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: William R. Fox and A. Cynthia Fox, Trustees of the Fox Family Trust dated 4/12/99 The legal description of the Property is: Real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California, described as follows: Parcel "A": Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 5803, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 66 of Parcel Maps, page(s) 7 and 8, records of said county. Parcel "B": A reciprocal easement for ingress, access, maintenance, operation and public utilities as set forth and described in that certain Agreement Establishing Covenants for Easements recorded December 20, 1988, Instrument No. 88-444255, Official Records. Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD gl) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development Thc various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD gl)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of thc facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicate~t to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Exhibit "B" Continued Proposed additions to WOrk Program (Fiscal Year 2003/2004) For Project: DRC2003-00492 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD# 1 ............... SLD # 2 1 ............ Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LIVID# 1 --- *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel Acres S 1 S 2 L 1 N/A 1.29 2.58 2.58 1.29 B-2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of # of Rate Per Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 7699 1.0 7951 $92.21 $733,161.71 Multi- Units 7091 0.5 3570 $92.21 $329,189.70 Family Comm/Ind. Ac re 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $1,062,535.83 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2003-00492) is: 1.29 Acres x 1.0 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. = $118.95 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment lanrl lls~ II'nlt TYne l)'nit~ lTnlt~ Fac~:nr l )'nit~ llnlt l~ven.o Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi- Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2003-00492) is: 1.29 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $45.85 Annual Assessment Exhibit "C" Continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2003/04. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment 1 ~ncl lT~e 1 ~nit Tyne l]'nit~ ITnit~ gacrc~r ITnit~ lTnil Revem~e Single Family Parcel 6050 1.00 6050 $39.97 $241,818.50 Multi Unit 24 1.00 919 $39.97 $36,732.43 Family Commercial Acre 19.05 2.00 19.05 $39.97 $1,522.86 Total $280,073.79 Thc Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2003-00492) is: 1.29 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $103.12 Annual Assessment Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIPICATIONS AND STRIPING AT ARROW ROUTE AND GROVE AVENUE RELATING TO TRACT 16309, A DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF UPLAND. RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 16309 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Tract 16309 is a development in the City of Upland. The City of Upland has securities for all the public improvements. The traffic signal and striping at the intersection of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue were permitted and inspected by Rancho Cucamonga. The work is completed and a Notice of Completion should be issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Upland will retain securities for the labor and material as well as the maintenance period. Respectfully submitted, Williim'i J. O Nell City Engineer WJO:KT:dlw Attachments A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16309 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 16309 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A I~ N C IN E E I~ | N G D E PAI~ T ~IE N T Staff: Rel rt DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer ~: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR TRACT 14523, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN BANYAN STREET AND WILSON AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY MBK HOMES, LTD RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14523 were approved by the City Council on March 20, 2002, and have been extended once. The developer, MBK Homes, Ltd., is requesting approval of another 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. MBK Homes has two tracts under construction and some of the homes in one tract cannot be completed until homes in the other tract are completed. The improvement agreement for the other tract will expire in September. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. R~4~fully submitted,, WJO:BM:dlw Attachments BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION NORTH 1'~ NTS CITY OF ITEM: Tract /t-/o~'Z3 I~ANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinity ~ February 4, 2004 Betty Miller City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 14495 and 14523 Dear Ms. Miller, MBK Homes, LTD. has requested an extension for bonds B34226988 and 28-33-84. Although we have been building at a quick pace, an extension is necessary. We have two tracts under construction and some of the homes in one tract cannot be completed until homes are completed in the other tract. For this reason, an extension is requested. If you have any questions, please contact me at (949) 789-8373. Thank you. Sinc er/e.l,~ Bob Liewer Vice President of Development Better ways. Greater means. PO Box 57065, IRViNg, CA 92619 7065 ~ 175 TECHNOLOGY Dmv~, Su~r~ 200, 1RVINE, CA 92618 949-789-8300 F^X 949-789-8325 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14523 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 17, 2004, by MBK Homes, LTD, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Day Creek Boulevard between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14523; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D~PART~IENT Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR TRACT 15783, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET AT VIVERO STREET, SUBMI'I-I'ED BY G & D CONSTRUCTION, INC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 15783 were approved by the City Council on October 2, 2002. This developer was required to install the drive approach and right turn lane on Carnelian Street before starting the on-site improvements. They also installed a traffic signal at Vivero Street with interconnect conduit to adjacent signals north and south on Carnelian Street. All of the underground utility work needs to be completed before they can proceed with parkway improvements, including sidewalk and street trees. The developer, G & D Construction, Inc., is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office Respectfully submitted,~ City Engineer WJO:BM:dlw Attachments ?? e¢~ Vivero Street 210 F'q, ff ~ ~ Baseline ~ ~ ~tvero ~ Foothi~ CITY OF iTEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Vicinity Map ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Tract 1578 G & D CONSTRUCTION INC. VICTORY HOMES ARCHIT£CTURE . DESIGN- GENERAL CONTRACTING LICENSE 432793 February 20, 2004 ATTN: BETTY MILLER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Re: EXTENSION OF ROW2002-00498 Ms Miller, Permit #ROW2002-00498 needs to be extended, per your request. This permit is for street and sidewalk improvements along Carnelian Street just North of thc intersection of Carnelian and Vivero Street. Upon pulling this permit, half of the permitted work was immediately completed. This involved the widening of Carnelian Street to allow for a tight hand turn lane. The second half of the work, consisting of sidewalk construction, was not completed at that time for underground utilities had to be installed before the sidewalk construction could begin. At the present time, we have finished installing all underground utilities and ready to construct the permitted sidewalk. As our street permit has expired, we are following through with your advice as to extend permit #ROW2002-00498 until October 2 of 2004. Attached are the three copies of the attached Improvement Agreement Extension and a processing fee of $298. Please call with any further questions on my direct line at (626) 437-8782. Many Thanks, 25 N SANTA ANITA AVE., SUITE A ARCADIA, CA 91006 TEL: (626) 447-3118 FAX: (626) 447-3162 t"~,,,,J )7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15783 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 17, 2004, by G & D Construction, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 15783; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C LI C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPART~EN? Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUItJEL~: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR TRACT 14498, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND BLUEGRASS AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14498 were approved by the City Council on March 20, 2002. The developer, Standard Pacific Co~poration, is requesting approval of another 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Standard Pacific is building three of the twelve tracts within the Rancho Etiwanda project. One of those tracts is nearing completion, but the other two need additional time to complete all of the homes and gain City acceptance of the street and landscaping improvements. Infrastructure improvements are substantially complete, but final landscaping will not occur until the homes are almost complete. The developer anticipates completion by December 31, 2004. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office. Respect fu/lly-su, bmitted, William J. 6~Neil City Engineer Attachmenls ~ i ~ BOUND~ OF ANNE~TION CITY OF ~M: Tract ~NCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Rancho Etiw~da ENG~EE~G DIVISION EXH~IT: Vicinit~ Ma~ I~ STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES February 13, 2004 Betty Miller City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Improvement Agreement Extensions- Tracts 14498 and 15838 Dear Betty: As you are aware, Standard Pacific's request for extension for the above referenced agreements is scheduled to expire on March 20,2004. The related subdivision contains a total of 99 lots within the two remaining tracts and the extensions are needed to allow adequate time to complete all of the homes and to gain City acceptance of the infrastructure and street landscaping improvements. Below is a summary of the project status as of February 13, 2004: Tract 14498- This tract includes our last phase of production units which are scheduled to be complete by September 24, 2004. All infrastructure improvements for this tract are substantially complete as of this writing. However, final street landscaping will not occur until the homes are almost complete. Standard Pacific will endeavor to have all improvements accepted by the City by December 31, 2004. Tract 15838- This tract includes our model home complex and six "buildout" lots. These six lots contain the last homes to be constructed in the community and should be complete by December 31, 2004. All inffastracture improvements for this tract are substantially complete as of this writing. However, final street landscaping will not occur until the homes are almost complete. Standard Pacific will endeavor to have all improvements accepted by the City by February 28, 2005. Inland Empire Divmon 255 East Rincon Street, Suite 200 * Corona, CA 92879 1330 TEL (909} 372-8500 · FAX (909) 372-8510 STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES Standard Pacific will maintain all performance and completion bonds in place until such time as the City has accepted the improvements and one-year maintenance bonds have been posted. As you can see, the need for extensions of the agreements is simply a function of the overall size and phasing of the community. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this project, please do not hesitate to call me at (909) 372-8500 ext. 241 Sincerely, STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES Inland Empire Division / Ryan Thomas Assistant Project Manager C: Fire Inland Empm_ Division 255 East Rincon Street, Suite 200 . Corona, CA 92879.1330 TEL(909) 372-8500oFAX(909)372-8510 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14498 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 17, 2004, by Standard Pacific Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Bluegrass Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14498; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A E NGIN EE RI~NG D E PART~IE NT Staff Report DALE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION, FOR TRACT 15838, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND BLUEGRASS AVENUE, SUBMI-I-rED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accept the subject Agreement Extension and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 15838 were approved by the City Council on March 20, 2002. The developer, Standard Pacific Corporation, is requesting approval of another 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Standard Pacific is building three of the twelve tracts within the Rancho Etiwanda project. One of those tracts is nearing completion, but the other two need additional time to complete all of the homes and gain City acceptance of the street and landscaping improvements, infrastructure improvements are substantially complete, but final landscaping will not occur until the homes are almost complete. The developer anticipates completion by February 28, 2005. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office Resp~t~lly submitted~, W/'li~. ~'Neil' /~ City Engineer WJO:BM:dlw Attachments {~OUNDARY OF' ANN[X.ATION NORTH ~'~ NTS CITY OF ITEM: Tract RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda ENGINEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Vicinit55_~ STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES February 13, 2004 Betty Miller City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Improvement Agreement Extensions - Tracts 14498 and 15838 Dear Betty: As you are aware, Standard Pacific's request for extension for the above referenced agreements is scheduled to expire on March 20,2004. The related subdivision contains a total of 99 lots within the two remaining tracts and the extensions are needed to allow adequate time to complete all of the homes and to gain City acceptance of the infrastructure and street landscaping improvements. Below is a summary of the project status as of February 13, 2004: Tract 14498- This tract includes our last phase of production units which are scheduled to be complete by September 24, 2004. All infrastructure improvements for this tract are substantially complete as of this writing. However, final street landscaping will not occur until the homes are almost complete. Standard Pacific will endeavor to have all improvements accepted by the City by December 31, 2004. Tract 15838- This tract includes our model home complex and six "buildout" lots. These six lots contain the last homes to be constructed in the community and should be complete by December 31, 2004. All infrastructure improvements for this tract are substantially complete as of this writing. However, final street landscaping will not occur until the homes are almost complete. Standard Pacific will endeavor to have all improvements accepted by the City by February 28, 2005. Inland Empire D,vtsi,m 255 East Rincon Street, Suite 200 ' Corona, CA 92879-1330 TEL (909) 372 8500 - FAX (909) 372-8510 I~ STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES Standard Pacific will maintain all performance and completion bonds in place until such time as the City has accepted the improvements and one-year maintenance bonds have been posted. As you can see, the need for extensions of the agreements is simply a function of the overall size and phasing of the community. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this project, please do not hesitate to call me at (909) 372-8500 ext. 241 Sincerely, STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES Inland Empire Division / Ryan Thomas Assistant Project Manager C: File Inland Empire Division 255 East Rincon Street, Suite 200 ' Corona, CA 92879-1330 TEl. (909) 372-8500 * FAX (909) 372-8510 RESOLUTION NO. ~//"~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 15838 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 17,2004, by Standard Pacific Corporation, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest comer of Wilson Avenue and Bluegrass Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 15838; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. R A N H O C U C A M O N G A StaffR ort DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJFL-T: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION, LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS BONDS, ACCEPT THE MAINTENANCE BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15540, LOCATED ON THE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BLVD. AND ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF BAKER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 15540 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Landscape Irrigation, Landscaping Improvements and Street Improvements Bonds and accept the Maintenance Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15540, located on the Between Foothill Blvd. and Arrow Route, east of Baker Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recormmended that the City Council release the existing Landscape Irrigation, Landscaping Improvements and Street Improvements Bonds and accept the Maintenance Bonds. Developer: Van Daele Development Corporation Release: Landscape Irrigation No. 3SM 044 833 00 $691,725.00 Landscaping Improvements No. 3SM 044 834 00 $2,378,722.10 Street Improvements No. 3SM 044 835 00 $1,275,085.50 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15540-VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION March 17, 2004 Page 2 Accept: Land. Irr. Maint. Bond No. 3SM 044 833 00-M $69,172.50 Land. Improv. Maint. Bond No. 3SM 044 834 00-M $237,872.21 Street Improv. Maint. Bond No. 3SM 044 835 00-M $127,508.55 Respectfully submitted, Willia~fi J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:KT:dlw VICINITY MAP PROJECT FOOIHILL ~.~u~ ~ ARROW .~ ~ 0 HIGHWAY UPLAND ~ -- 6 ~ N.T.S RANCHO CUCAMONCA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SO ION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15540 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 15540 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. ENGINEERING DEPART~IENT Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~% Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tech~an ~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE ETIWANDA AVENUE BIKE LANE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 03-047 AS COMPLETE, APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $3,105.54 TO ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650/1418176-0 FROM MEASURE I FUND BALANCE, RETAIN THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AS A GUARANTEE BOND, RELEASE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $144,046.34 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Efiwanda Avenue Bike Lane and Sidewalk Improvement, Contract No. 03-047, as complete, approval to appropriate $3,105.54 to Account No. 11763035650/1418176-0 from Measure I fund balance, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond for one year, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $128,128.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention Jn the amount of $14,404.63, 35 days after acceptance. Aisc, approve the final contract amount of $144,046.34. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Etiwanda Avenue Bike Lane and Sidewalk Improvement scope of work consisted of installing a bike lane and sidewalk, cobblestone curb and 9utter, asphalt concrete paving, cold plane and asphalt concrete overlay, reconstruction of drive approaches, driveways, and landscape replacement. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: > Budget Amount: $152,890 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept the Etiwanda Bike Lane and Sidewalk Improvements March 17, 2004 Page 2 ~ Account Number: 12343035650/t418234-0 & 11763035650/1418176-0 ~ Engineer's Estimate: $136,807.50 ~ City Council's Approval to Advertise: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 ~' Publish dates for local paper: April 22 and May 6, 2003 ~ Bid Opening: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 at 2:00 PM ~ Contract Award Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2003 ~ Low Bidder: Olivas Valdez, Inc. > Contract Amount: $128,128.00 > 10% Contingency: $12,812.80 > Final Contract Amount: $144,046.34 > Difference in Contract Amount: $15,918.34 (12.42%) Increase due to increased quantities of sidewalk and bike trail, 10" cobble face curb and gutter, drive approach including driveway and cobbie curb return, crushed aggregate base, and asphalt concrete This project was constructed along the frontage of existing historical homes on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue. In many instances the foliage was very dense making it hard to determine what the existing grade was during the design process. Once construction began and the foliage removed, it became evident that changes to the plan were necessary to match up to existing improvements and to please the homeowners, resulting in increased quantities. Respectfully submitted, William' J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachments VICI/~'ITY ]~IAP PRO~C~T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETI~ANDA AVENUE (mo¥ ~cTom ~r ~o ?oo~ RESOLUTION NO. ~)/'~'"~)~ ~" A RESOLUTION Of THE CItY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ETIWANDA AVENUE BIKE LANE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT, CONTRACT NO. 03-047 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Etiwanda Avenue Bike Lane and Sidewalk Improvement, Contract No. 03-047, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. F~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: James T. Harris, Associate Engineer./-~"~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Techni~n~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 929 1828 -34 IN THE AMOUNT OF $157,050.00, FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VINTAGE DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 01-077 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Faithful Performance Bond No. 929 1828 -34 in the amount of $157,050.00 for the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting at Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive, Contract No. 01-077. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Sierra Pacific Electrical Contracting 2542 Avalon Street Riverside, CA 92509-2057 Respectfu~lly submitted, William~'J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JTH/RO:Is Attachments VICINITY MAP TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VINTAGE DRIVE PROJECT EXHIBIT A I~ A C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D E PAR TI~IEN T Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Karen Tarlton, Public Services Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR TRACT 14120- 2, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CARRIAGE ESTATES, LLC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 14120-2, located on the south side of Banyan Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue submitted by Carriage Estates, LLC. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City inspector has accepted the maintenance turnover and the street improvements are in acceptable condition and workmanship. Developer: Carriage Estates, LLC 4141 Inland Empire Bird, Ste. 345 Ontario, CA 91764 Release: Bond No. B32652344 $30,300.00 Respectfully submitted, Williar~ ' I City Engineer KT:TCH //1 R A C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Sta.ffRe rt DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Kamn Tarlton, Public Service Tech I SIIBJF. LT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND, FOR PARCEL MAP 15536, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FIFYH STREET, WEST OF MILL1KEN AVENUE, SUBMITFED BY FAIRWAY PALMS LLC. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Parcel Map 15536, located on the south side of Fifth Street, west of Milliken Avenue. submitted by Fairway Palms LLC. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Developer: Fairway Palms LLC 5510 Morehouse Drive, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92121 Release: Bond No. 1845964A $16,530.00 Respectfully submitted, City Engineer WHO:KT:dlw /12. 6TH STREET 4TH STREET R A N h O C U C A M O N G a ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DALE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer~"~ Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Tec~;'/~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 8548580 IN THE AMOUNT OF $251,050.23, FOR THE HERMOSA AVENUE STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 400' NORTH OF CHURCH STREET TO 500' NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 02-013 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 8548580 in the amount of $251,050.23 for the Hermosa Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvements from 400' North of Church Street to 500' North of Base Line Road, Contract No. 02-013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Mike Bubalo Construction Co., Inc. 5102 Gayhurst Avenue Baldwin Park, CA 91706 Res);~fu~y submitted, .~ Willia~'~'/..~. O~,N~il~ ' /'~ ~'~''~'~ City Engineer WJO:CH/RO:Is Attachments HERMOSA AVENUE STORM .DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS (FROM 400':i: N. OF CHURCH STREET TO 500'~ N. OF BASE LINE ROAD) : ~, : :--"[ : I : : CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlVIONGA VICINITY MAP R A N C H O C U C A M O N G ^ ENGINEERING DE PARTF'IE NT StaffR port DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician/~b~,~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT THE PHASE I-A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001- 01, CONTRACT NO. 02-075 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $6,134,192.46 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Phase I-A of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 02-075, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, accept a Maintenance Bond, release the Faithful Performance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $6,390,368.70 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $613,419.25, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $6,134,192.46. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Phase I-A of Community Facilities District 2001-01 scope of work consisted of constructing storm drains including reinforced concrete box, reinforced concrete pipe, and appurtenant structures; street improvements including curb and gutter, asphalt concrete pavement, medians, bus turnouts, traffic signals, safety lighting, pertinent signing and striping, water distribution system, and sanitary sewer mains. Pertinent information of the project is as fellows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Phase 1-A of Community Facilities District 2001-01 March 17, 2004 Page 2 ~' Account Number: 1612303565011442612-0 > Engineer's Estimate: $7,509,217.75 > City Council's Approval to Advertise: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 > Publish dates for local paper: May 9 and 23, 2002 > Bid Opening: July 2, 2002 >> Contract Award Date: July 17, 2002 > Low Bidder: E.L. Yeager Construction Company, Inc. > Contract Amount: $6,390,368.70 > 10% Contingency: $639,036.87 > Final Contract Amount: $6,134,192.46 > Difference in Contract Amount: $403,628.16 (4.01%) Decrease During construction significant cost reductions to the final contract amount were made possible by deferring construction of certain contract items to phases of the project to be constructed later under separate contract. Asphalt concrete cap paving ($142,000.00) quantities, the final 0.10' has been deferred to a future contract; concrete sidewalk ($102,000.00) has been deleted and deferred to a future contract; fiber optic conduits ($130,000.00) have been deleted and will now be installed by the adjacent developer; and other items such as the reduction of reinforced concrete pipe quantities (due to redesign), elimination of steel casing for sewer and the deletion of electrical conduit (due to redesign) reduced the final contract amount. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:WS/RO:Is Attachments 117 VICINITY MAP COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2001-01 PHASE lA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CitY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASE I-A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001- 01, CONTRACT NO. 02-075 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Phase I-A of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 02-075, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. R A N H O C U C A M O N G A CITY C 0 U N CI l~ Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director BY: Jan Reynolds, Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution approving the issuance of 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds for the benefit of the Redevelopment Agency Capital Improvement Program RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached Resolution that approves the sale of a 2004 Tax Allocation Bond that is supported by tax increment revenues from the Redevelopment Agency. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In February 1990, the City and Redevelopment Agency created the Rancho Cucamonga Public Financing Authority for the purpose of issuing tax allocation bonds. This was done to be consistent with State Law. Under California Redevelopment Law, a Joint Powers Authority is allowed to sell tax allocation bonds on behalf of a Redevelopment Agency through the cost effective negotiated sale process directly with the bond underwriter. The Agency has the sole responsibility for paying the financing of the bonds. The Financing Authority was last used in 2001 when the Agency sold bonds to finance construction of an estimated $65 million in public improvements contained within the Redevelopment Plan. In 1994, the Financing Authority issued $64.4 million that was used to refund prior bonds. Prior to that the Financing Authority issued bonds in the amount of $107.8 million that were used to refund prior bonds and fund new capital construction. Even though the Financing Authority is issuing the debt, only Redevelopment Agency tax increment is pledged as the source of funds to pay the bonds. No City or Fire Protection District revenues are used or obligated to pay off these bonds. The proposed $173.1 million bond issue has two components. A portion of the bond issue, approximately $60 million, is associated with a refunding of a prior bond issue. With the more favorable interest rates available in today"s market, the Agency began exploring cost savings in refinancing prior bond issues, and determined that significant savings can be attained with the refinancing of the 1994 Tax Allocation Bonds. The Agency will save approximately $3.3 million in present value dollars through this refunding. The second aspect of the proposed bond issue deals with raising funds to construct capital facilities for both the Fire Protection District and the Redevelopment Agency. With the positive growth in the project area, and the positive increases in the assessed valuation within the project area, the Agency is at a point now where it can support a bond issue generating an estimated $87.5 million for Agency project area capital improvements, and an estimated $12.2 million for Fire protection capital improvements. Attachment "A" identifies the projects and how the estimated bond proceeds will be distributed. The projects that have been identified will not only continue to improve the Redevelopment Project Area by addressing various infrastructure issues, but they will also advance the economic development opportunities of the City. Two construction projects, the 1-15 Interchanges at Arrow and at Base Line are long-term projects; however, the City must demonstrate construction funding in order to secure additional match funding from State and Federal Agencies. The documents being presented as part of the attached Resolution are required for completion of the proposed bond issuance. The Agency's underwriter, Stone & Youngberg, will acquire the bonds from the Public Financing Authority once they have been issued. The Agency's legal firm, Best, Best and Krieger, has prepared and/or reviewed the necessary legal documents and Official Statement associated with this issuance. The Agency's independent financial advisor, Fieldman Rolapp, has also reviewed all the documents and will assist the Agency in negotiating a competitive underwdter's discount. All costs of issuance will be paid from the issue itself. The bonds are planned to be sold and the proceeds available to the Agency by the end of March 2004. Once the bond proceeds are available, the Agency will begin working with other City Departments as needed to initiate any required design and development work for the proposed public improvements funded from the bond issuance. Other action items relating to the bond issuance appear on the Public Financing Authority and the Redevelopment Agency agendas. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director Attachments: Attachment "A" - List of Projects and estimated funding Resolution IZl Attachment "A" The Agency will use the net proceeds to finance the following public projects that benefit the project area and are consistent with the Redevelopment Plan: Public Improvement Projects Estimated Cost 1-15 Interchange at Base Line (total cost estimated at $30 million) $18 million 1-15 Intemhange at Arrow (total cost Estimated at $40 million) $23 million Foothill Boulevard (Grove to Vineyard) and Bridge $4.5 million Library Grant Match $3.5 million Hellman Avenue Storm Drain (upper and lower) Design and $2 million Lower Right-of-way Foothill Boulevard Improvements - Phase 2 (Vineyard to east of $5 million Archibald Victoria Gardens DDA - Connection Infrastructure $2.5 million Haven Avenue Underpass at Railroad $18.5 million Industrial Fiber Optic Program $.5 million Arrow/Etiwanda Storm Drain $2.5 million Public Facilities Capital Reserve $7.5 million Fire Headquarters $4.2 million Fire Training Tower and Training Facility $2.5 million Fire Facilities Capital Reserve $3 million Fire Equipment Reserve $2.5 million 1994 Tax Allocation Bond Refunding and Debt Service Reserve $60 million 2004 Debt Service Reserve $8.9 million Estimated Insurance $3.1 million Costs of Issuance $1.4 million TOTAL $173.1 million 122.. ALLOCATION BONDS RECITALS: A. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") has proposed to issue bonds (the "Bonds") pursuant to its Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Authorizing the issuance of the Agency's Rancho Redevelopment Project 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds, and the Execution and Delivery of a Supplemental Indenture, a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, a Composite Purchase Agreement and an Official Statement and Approving a Preliminary Official Statement," a copy of which has been presented to the City Council at this meeting and a copy of which is now on file in the office of the Secretary of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY FINDS, DETERMINES, RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 . The issuance and sale of the Bonds by the Agency, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Agency Resolution described in the recitals hereof, is hereby approved. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of March, 2004. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, Secretary 1 RVPUB~JRR\666057.1 12.3 THE C I T ¥ OF Ir I~A N C II 0 C U C A H 0 N G A Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst Ill SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING. AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 19, 2004, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 19, 2004, to levy the annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. It is recommended that there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: It is recommended that the assessment rates remain at existing levels for all Landscape Maintenance District for FY 2004/2005. The water conservation efforts implemented within the landscape maintenance districts continue to help keep costs down, allowing the assessment rates to remain at the same levels as the rates for FY 2002/2003. In many of the districts, back taxes have been paid with interest and penalties thereby increasing the revenue in those districts. In some district, an increase in the amount of landscaped area has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operation costs. However, this cost will be offset by corresponding increases in revenue received from new developments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. This offsetting mechanism still holds true and has allowed the assessment rate to remain constant. The following, along with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2004/2005 rates: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 2004 Page 2 Assessment Rate Landscape Maintenance District Per Assessment Unit LMD # 1 - General City $ 92.21 LMD # 2 - Victoria Planned Community $422.00 LMD # 3A - Hyssop $413.74 LMD # 3B - Commerical/Industrial $352.80 LMD # 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $252.50 LMD # 5 - Tot Lot $113.29 LMD # 6 - Caryn Planned Community $246.97 LMD # 7 - North Etiwanda $307.05 LMD # 8 - South Etiwanda $151.45 LMD # 9 - Lower Etiwanda $375.91 LMD # 10 - Rancho Etiwanda $597.09 Respectfully submitted, Willi~_m J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MT:sc Attachment -2- 12.5 RESOLUTION NO. ~)Z//"'~q~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10. NO INCREASE OFASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approve and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2004/2005 for the subsequent proceedings. RESOLUtIO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 10 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for the fiscal year 2004/2005 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of- way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: that the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 ", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 9", and "Map of Landscape Maintenance District CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 2004 Page 2 No. 10", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Enqineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearinq SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, May 19, 2004, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2004/2005. Landscapinq and Liqhtinq Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Dally Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. THE CITY OF DANCIIO CUCAMONGA Staff Relmrt DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 19, 2004, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR-2004/2005 FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 19, 2004, to levy the annual assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. It is recommended that there be no increase in the assessment rates in these districts for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Below is an itemized analysis on a district-by-district basis. To summarize, the assessment rates for all eight Street Lighting Maintenance Districts are recommended to remain at existing levels for the upcoming fiscal year. These assessments cover the actual costs of the districts. The expenditure budgets in all of the districts have been increased due to Southern California Edison electric rate increases. In the past, any available prior year carryover has been used to maintain assessments within the annual assessment revenue requirements. This policy continues for FY 2004/2005 and will allow the assessment rates to remain unchanged. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 2004/2005 rates that are recommended to remain the same as FY 2003/2004 rates. The assessment rate for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 2004 Page 2 Assessment Rate Street Liqhting Maintenance District Per Assessment Unit SLMD # 1 - Arterial $17.77 SLMD # 2 - General City Local $39.97 SLMD # 3 - Victoria Planned Community $47.15 SLMD # 4 - Terra Vista Planned Community $28.96 SLMD # 5 - Caryn Planned Community $34.60 SLMD # 6 - Commercial/Industrial $51.50 SLMD # 7 - North Etiwanda $33.32 SLMD # 8 - South Etiwanda $193.75' *This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of street lights to assessment units. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MT:sc Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~ ¥'~? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8. NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said reports and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said reports, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said reports be hereby approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said reports are hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said reports shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Reports for the fiscal year 2004/2005 for the subsequent proceedings. RESOLUTION NO. ~)/'//' ~) t~l ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 2004/2005 for the maintenance and operation of those street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said districts. Location of Work. SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the reports of the City Engineer and described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7" and "Map of Street Lighting CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 2004 Page 2 Maintenance District No. 8" indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within said assessment districts and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. Report of Engineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual reports of the City Engineer, which reports indicates the amount o~ the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The reports titled "Annual Engineer's Repod" are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said reports is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearing. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, May 19, 2004, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2004/2005. Landscapinq and Liqhting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. R A N C H O C U C A M O N GA ~ N GI~ I~I~I~ING DI~PAI~T~II~NT Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Michael TenEyck, Management Analyst III SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SEI-FING OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 19, 2004, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE IS PROPOSED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Engineer's Reports and set the Public Hearing for May 19, 2004,to levy the annual assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85). It is recommended that there be no increase in assessment rates in this district for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Planned Communities. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 March 17, 2004 Page 2 Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions giving approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. It is recommended that the assessment rates in PD-85 remain at existing levels for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment per Parcel Single Family Residential $52.00 Less than 1.50 acres $26.00 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres $78.00 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres $182.00 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres $364.00 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres $728.00 25.01 acres and Larger $1,300.00 Respectfully submitted, William O. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MT:sc Attachments A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85). NO INCREASE OF ASSESSMENT RATE PROPOSED. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of said City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, should not be modified in any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and it is hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approve and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 2004/2005 for the subsequent proceedings. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Work SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85) for the fiscal year 2004/2005 for the maintenance and operation and debt service payment of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said district. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement) in connection with said district. Location of Work SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and described on maps that are on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled "Assessment Diagram Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)." Description of Assessment District SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the district, which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-85)", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within said assessment district and which maps are on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and more particular description of said assessment district, and the said map so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment district. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS March 17, 2004 Page 2 Report of Enqineer SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. approved the annual report of the City Engineer, which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. Time and Place of Hearinq SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing is hereby scheduled in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730. WEDNESDAY, May 19, 2004, AT 7:00 P.M. Any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 2004/2005. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll, such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. Landscapinq and Lighting Act of 1972 SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. TH CITY OF I~ANC~O CUCAIqONGfl Staff Report DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa Kuschel, Contract Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve a request to subdivide 16 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street APN: 0202-741-64, 0202-751-36 and 37. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644. ANALYSIS: The project was approved by the Planning Commission on February 11, 2004. The Commissioners were presented with the appellant's concerns prior to the meeting in a letter dated January 30, 2004. The letter outlined issues related to headlight glare, inaccurate recordation of existing street improvements, and traffic impacts. At the hearing, the City Engineer and City Planner were in attendance to address the appellant's concerns. Staff responded in the following manner: · The alignment of the proposed street for the new subdivision would not impact the appellant's property with respect to direct headlight glare. Only in the instance that a vehicle turning left when exiting the development would the property be impacted by any glare. Additionally, the frequency of vehicles turning left during evening hours is minimal since the tendency for residents at that hour would be to make trips utilizing Base Line Road for shopping and other similar destinations. · The existing improvements of Beryl Street consist of asphalt berms on both sides of the street. This development will improve the west side with concrete curb and gutter along its frontage. Even though the east side of Beryl Street will remain with asphalt berm, the Engineering Division does not foresee any unusual traffic concerns. Beryl Street is a collector street and has left-turn movements at intersections and driveways throughout its corridor. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 17, 2004 Page 2 · Staff is not aware of any added traffic to Beryl Street resulting from this or any other new development in the immediate area. There is a City storm drain project on Carnelian Street, which may be causing additional traffic congestion. Staff has not received any other complaints about traffic congestion. This development of only 16 homes will not significantly impact Beryl Street. The Planning Commission reviewed the concerns raised by the appellant and the responses from staff. The Commission believed that staff has adequately addressed the appellant's concerns. The Commission then unanimously approved the project. The appeal letter to the City Council filed by the applicant was identical to that presented to the Planning Commission and provides no new information that was not already considered during the Planning Commission meeting. According to the City Traffic Engineer, if the Council approves this development and it is constructed, any resident who has a concern about traffic may address their concern to him. If improvements, such as a traffic signal, are required, the Traffic Engineer will program the work. City Planner BB:LI~ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's Letter of Appeal dated January 30, 2004 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 11,2004 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Minutes dated February 11,2004 Draft City Council Resolution Denying Appeal and Upholding Approval for SUB'I-r16644 Jan 31 04 0~:56a Jason Hoover } REGt:WED 69os sm:et ~m ~ CA 91701 J~u~ 30, 2~ ~ITY OP R~CHO CUCAMO~ ~ CLERK CITY OF ~C~O CUCAMONGA PL~G D~SION P.O. ~x 807 ~o Cu~on~ CA To ~om II May ~n~: ~ ~ ~.i~su~ th~ ~ a~n~on ~i~ my ~t msiden~ m 6~5 ~1 one ~, If for ew~ ho~hold ~ ~ ~ ~ ~vi~ in ~d out of~ ~a ~ch ~ ~*n on ave~e ~ nm~ of~ using that *t~ ~h w~k ~11 ~ 3~6 or 17,472 ~ per ye~. ~1 of~ h~ights ~m ~ ve~cl~ ~e~ ~y m ~ve~ No~ ~ So~ ~11 ~ d~y ~m~ into my livi~ mm, kit~ ~d ~mNot only do I f~l like ~is ~il in~ on my pfiv~y ~d ~o~ but t~t it ~11 ai~ I~ m ~e dev~on of my pm~. I m ~ng the Pltmning Divi~on ~ pl~e ~vi~ ~is issm. To avoid ~i~ nffi~ ~e ~4~out-lot ~d ~ mo~d 107 f~ ~o ~e no~. ~e ~nd i~ue i~ ~ ~1 ~o~ ~eet improvem~ ~ not ~ at ~N-202- 041-14. ~em i~ a 7 foot jogg~ ~t is in a w~tem ~ecfion of~l S~t which does ~t m~t ~e ~ f~t ~imm ~mm~. I ~ve ~y ~u~ ~ violation w~ Li~ Kumher ~ ~v~ not ~iv~ a ~sfaeto~ ~ to ~ probit. ~e ~ ma~ is ~t ~e add~ ~affic ~ inc~ ~m ~e pro~ developmem ~ m~ it ex--ely difficult m get out of my residence ~m 7:00 m ~fii 10:00 m. ~d ~e ~fio~ raffle from ~e ~idenm of ~e d~elopment ~11 o~y ~va~ ~e ~bl~. I ~11 ~ ~d~ ~i~ ~ ~e~. ~e~ ~d ~ ~ ~e ~1 i~i~ to h~lp mn~l ~e ~hou~ ~c mn~fions. I ~ve discm~d ~e ma~ ~ Dave Willim~ of~ta ~m Hi~. I ~ ~pointcd ~ ~s ~ply of'Tm o~y con~ wi~ mm~ d~eiopm~nt ifit'~ ~ ~e s~t'. I ~id ~ ~ I f~l it is a public i~ue for ~ ~il~ cindy, ~d ~d~ ~n a one-mile mdim of~e ~eh~l. H~ r~li~, "IfI g~t a ch~ I MIl l~k in m it'. I ~p~i~ yo~ ~g ~ fim~ m ~ew my ~ncems ~d ho~ ~ey ~1 ~ ~soiv~ to · e ~fis~cfio~ of~l ~o~ ~volv~. THE CITY O F I~A N Cll 0 CUCAHONGA Staff Report · DATE: Februrary 11,2004 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa Kuschel, Contract Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 3.33 acres of land into 16 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street - APN: 0202-741-64, 0202-751-36 and 37. Related File: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 5.3 dwelling units per acre. B. Surroundinq Land Use and Zonin.q: North Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site Low-Medium Residential North - Low-Medium Residential South - Low-Medium Residential East Low Residential West Low-Medium Residential D. Site Characteristics: The 3.33-acre site is located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street. The site slopes southerly at approximately 3 percent and contains three homes that are proposed for demolition. A row of five Palm trees currently located within the right-of-way will be relocated throughout the site to be made part of a future landscape palette. Other existing vegetation consists of one Pine tree, two windrow trees, four mature Juniper bushes, and several other large bushes, which will remain at this time. Lemon and orange trees are also found at the southern portion of the site. Iqz PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11,2004 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The project proposes the subdivision of 16 single-family lots. The project is a subdivision only, with no home product proposed at this time. The proposed lots range from 5,004 to 9,816 square feet in size and are substantially larger than the Hamilton Ranch neighborhood that abuts the project's west and north boundaries. The average lot size is 6,393 square feet (6,000 sq. ~t. required in the Low-Medium Residential District) and is consistent with neighborhoods to the south and east. The subdivision proposes a new private street to be accessed by Beryl Street that terminates into a cul-de-sac. Other public improvements include pavement widening, sidewalk, and curb/gutter along the property frontage. The developer is deferring installation of perimeter block walls until the homes are constructed. B. Design Review Committee: On December 16, 2003, the Design Review Committee (Stewart, McPhail, Fong) reviewed the project and recommended the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval. The Committee indicated any minor exception or variance requests for reduced setbacks for future house products would not be supported given the "tight" layout for some of the lots. C. Technical and Grading Review Committees: The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. D. Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00365: A tree survey prepared by a landscape architect (David Evans & Associates, December 8, 2004) revealed a total of 18 trees satisfy at least one criteria of the City's criteria for heritage trees. Of these 18 trees, 12 trees are in poor health/form and are recommended to be removed, 4 are in good health/form and are recommended to be relocated, and 2 are in very good health/form and are recommended to be protected if possible. The remaining trees on site are fruit or Walnut/Pecan trees, which are not considered heritage trees and are proposed to be removed. The four Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting and reused within the project landscaping. Staff recommends a condition of approval consistent with the landscape architect's recommendation to preserve in place the Deodar Cedar (Survey Tag #1) and California Sycamore tree (Survey Tag #11), if possible, by using curb adjacent sidewalk and meandering perimeter wall around the tree drip line. If the City Engineer and City Planner determine that preservation in place is not possible, the trees could be removed and replaced. The remaining 12 trees shall be removed and replaced. E. Neighborhood Meetinq: On November 20, 2003, a neighborhood meeting was held to discuss the project. There were 12 residents in attendance. All attendees appeared agreeable with the project. Only matters regarding the timeline of the proposed street improvements and type of development allowed on the property were of concern. F. Environmental Assessment: The applicant prepared Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Pad II. It was determined the project could have a significant adverse environmental impact on: Shod-term air quality and dust during site grading; Cultural resources if any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading; Biological in terms of tree removal; Hydrology and Water Quality, and noise during construction. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 3 The mitigations listed in the Initial Study Part II and attached Resolution of Approval will reduce the short-term impacts to less than significant. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:LS/Is Attachments: Exhibit"A"- Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Grading Plan with Sections Exhibit "C"- Tentative Tract Map Exhibit"D"- Design Review Committee Comments dated December 16, 2003 Exhibit "E" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644 SITE UTILIZATION PLAN Tentative Map No. 16644 /-600' RADIUS LINE / / I ,~'~ ~'~ ~ ~-- ' ' -t-- '1' V~.~,~' ~:I~ . .i ..... ~~'~ .... -~ I Z_~-~ ..~..- i ~' ~:' '~' ~' ........... ' ""/ -' · CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ~ , Tentative Map No. 16644 I~[ ~pln~m~ ............ (~) ~-,... ~, ~) .,~,ln~' Con~ual~l~Omdlng Plan ,.,-~ TENTATIVE MAP No. 16644 M.B. 171/94-97 I '. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 P.M. Lisa Kuschel December 16, 2003 I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES: The proposed subdivision of a 3.33 acre property into 16 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street - APN: 0202-751-36, 0202-741-64, 0202-751-37. Related File: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040. Desiqn Parameters: The property slopes from north to south at a 3 percent slope and contains three homes that are proposed for demolition. None of these homes appear to be historic. A row of five Palm trees currently located within the right-of-way will be relocated throughout the site to be made as part of a future landscape palette. Other existing vegetation consists of one Pine tree, two windrow trees, four mature Juniper bushes, and several other large bushes of which will remain at this time. Lemon and orange trees are also found at the southern portion of the property. Each of the 16 proposed lots complies with the minimum lot size (5,000 square feet) and minimum parcel width (50 feet average) required in the Low-Medium Residential District section of the · Municipal Code. No homes are proposed at this time. ~ The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on November 20, 2004, in which all attendees appeared agreeable with the project. Only matters regarding the timeline of the proposed street improvements and type of development allowed on the property were of concern. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. Although the proposed subdivision meets the minimum net averaqe of 6,000 square feet for Low-Medium Residential zone, more than 50 percent of the lots are less than 5,500 square feet. Lots 2 and 6 are just a bit above 5,000 square feet. Lot 11 is constrained by 2 to 1 slopes and the required 15-foot flat usable yard. Most of the larger lots are at the end of the cul-de-sac; however, are barely at the minimum 30-foot lot width standard. Staff believes that there is room to adjust the lot lines of several larger lots so as to even out the size of the smaller lots. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. A retaining wall as high as 8 feet (at Lot 2) with a 5-foot high screen fence on top is being proposed along the south property boundary. Minor Exception and/or Variance would be needed concurrent with any formal Development Review application for homes. The applicant should work with the Grading Committee to reduce the height of the retaining wall. Decorative material such as block with stucco, split face, and pilasters should be used for the wall. 2. The site contains a variety of trees that are proposed for removal, except some Palm trees that may be relocated to the parkway along Beryl Avenue. An arborist report has not been submitted yet. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. DRC COMMENTS SUBTT16644 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES December 16, 2003 Page 2 1. The comer side yard wail shall set back 5 feet from the property line. Recommendation: Staff recommends that revised plans be submitted for Design Review Committee review under the Consent Calendar. Desi.qn Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, Cristine McPhail, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Lisa Kuschel The Committee recommended approval of the subdivision. The Committee stated that several lots are tight and that they would not support Minor Exception or Variance for setbacks for future house products. The applicant acknowledged. cl~ o~ p~cHo CUCAM0~GA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ~ov 2 o 2oo~ (Part I - Initial Study) Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division ~ooo) 4~-275o RECEIVED ' PLANNING The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WlLL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the msponsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perfoffn work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form # 16644 pertains: Project 'l-tM # 16644, 16 Lot Tentative Tract Map Title: Name & Address of project Phyllis J. Brown, 6882 Beryl APN0202-741-64 owners): Michae] S. San'a/l, H~athcr $. Gibbs, 6896 Beryl APN 0202-741-64 Jeffrey and Racquel Yamada 6928 B~I APN0202-751-37 Name & Address of developer or project Chades Joseph Associates sponsor: 10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person & Chuck Buquet, Chades Joseph Associates Address: 10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone (909) 481-1822 Number: ~ ~N~me & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Same as above. InformaUon indicated by astedsk (*) is not required of non-construction CUP ~ unless otherwise requested by staf~ '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. See attached. ~) Project Location (describe): West side of Beryl Street, South of 19~ Street 4) Assossor~ Parcel Numbere (attach addiUonal sheet if necessa~y): 0202-751-36, 0202-741-64 and, 0202-751-37 5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. 3.332 ft.): 6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & preposed dedications): 2.997 acres 7)Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would effect the project site (attach additional sheet il None 8)Include a description of all permits which wfll be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: No permits needed at this time, only Tentative Tract Map and Final Map Approvals. 9)Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including infom3ation on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the stractums. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrelogic studies, biotic and amheological sun/eys, traffic studies): 0202-751-36-6896 Beryl St Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701Single Family Residence See photo Survey 0202-741-64- 6882 Be~ St Alta Loma, CA 91701Family Residence See photo Survey 0202-751-37- Single 6928 Be~ St Alta Loma, CA 91701Single Family Residence See photo Survey There am a mw of palm trees along Beryl that will be ralocated within the site as part of the landscape palette throughout The site. Them ara (1) pine tree, (2) windrow trees, (2) non-describe shrub bushes that have overgrown to look like trees (4) large juniper bushes, and (5) palm trees that will be relocated. There are a number of dead and dying trees in Reer portion of the properties with some that have been pa~ial chopped down as firewood. Thera are vadous crops Such as dying corn, fruit trees such as lemon and orange on the southern most properly as well. 1 O) Descttbe the known cultural and/or histottcal aspects of the site. Site all sources ofinformaSon (books, published repo~fs and oral history): Them ara no known cultural or historical aspects of these sites. 11) Descdbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Existing noise sources will not have an adverse impact on proposed uses, see attached noise study. 12) Descdbe the pmposed pmject in detail. This should pmvide an adequate descdption of the site in terms of ui~mate use which will result from the posed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) ff nesessaty: The proposed project is a 16 lot Tentative Tract Map, and will be consistent with the existing land use designation for this property, r 13)Descdbe the sunounding prope~es, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histo~fcal, or scenic aspects. Indicate the ~ype of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensify of land use (one-family, aparbnent houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and .scale of development (height, fiontage, setback, roar yah:l, etc.): The proposed project will provide for rasidential development that ia consistent with the City's approved land use forthis properly. There are no know hisfadcal significance to the site. North is Low Medium residential, West is Low Medium residential, East ia Low residential, South is Low Medium residential. No building heights I.a~er than 2.stoq,'. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the suffounding general area of the project? Minor changes that occur will be in conformance with the existing approved land use designation for this property. 15)Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amounL How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of sound proofing am pmposed? Short term construction noise, with construction activity that complies with City Building Permit requirements. 16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: Applicable Tree Removal Permits will be filed and project will be consistent with City Landscape requirements. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: N/A 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage esUmates). For further clarffication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Dis~ct at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal~day) 11,280 Peak use (gal/Day) 22,560 b. Commerclal/Tnd. (gal~day/ac) Peak use (gal~rain/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. __ Septic Tank x Sewer. If septic tanks ara proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Atiachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987- 2591. a. Residential (gal~day) 4,320 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal~day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 16 lots Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Minimum 5,039 thru Maximum of 10,637 Attached (indicate whether units ara rantal orfor sale units): N/A 21)Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $.__TBD to $._TBD Rent (per month) $. to $. 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: TBD 23) Indicate anUcipated household size by unit TBD hype: 24)Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: 7.2 b. Junior High: 3.3 c. Senior High __ 3.2 COMMERCIAL~ INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe ~ype of use(s) and major function(s) of commemial, industrial or institutional N/A 26) Total floor area of commemial, industlfal, or institutional uses by N/A type: 27) Indicate hour~ of operation: N/A 28) Number of Total: N/A employees: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate o! hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that curmntiy reside in the N/A city: 31)For commemial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): N/A ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. All Agencies contacted have indicated their ability to provide services to the site. 33) In the known history of this preperty, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matedals ? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic mate#als include, but are not limited to PCB 9; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, nils, solvents, and other flammable tiquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materfals and descdbo their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, il known. Not applicable, 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? ff yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and preposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No I hereby cerlffy that the statements fumished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evalua§on of this project to the best of my abilEy, that the facts, statements, and information presented ara true and coffect tot he best of my knowledge and belie~ I further understand that additional information may be raquired to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cuca~ Date: October, 21, 2003 Signatura: Title: Chuck Buouet,Chades Joseph Associates 10' 710 FEET 34"07'30" , 117o37,20,, "43 1'46 35' ,~. ,~_0~ Mapped, edited, and publisl' WaterRevisedResourcesin cooperation with CUCAMONGA PEAK, CALIF. Control by USGS and NOS/NOAA 34117-B5-TF-024 Topography by photogrammetrkll taken 1952 and planetable sur~ 1966 o-~9' OMILS Revised from aerial photograph~ PHOTOREVISED 1988 6 DMA 2452 1[ NE--SERIES V895 Polyconic projection. 1927 Nort~ American Uatum 10,OOO-foot grid based on California coordinate system, zone 5 lOOO-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, UTM GRID AND 1988 MAGNETIC NORTH zone 11, shown in blue DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET TO place on the predicted North American Datum 1983 move the projection lines 2 meters north and F 83 meters east as shown by dashed corner ticks There may be private inholdJngs within the boundaries of the National or State reservations shown on this map J~. View from SEC of project site of home on southern most parcel, Palm trees to be relocated from this area to along frontage Beryl. 2. View from NWC of southernmost parcel facing north through center parcel along Beryl Shows ~mproved storm ctrain and widened street, Site Photoqraphs Exhibit Provided j Bery! Parcel Map ~ ~ ~ ~ . Pagel 3, View from SEC of project site toward west portion of property. 4. View from SWC of project sit~ west toward Beryl Avenue. tS{re Photoqraphs by: Exhibit Provided Beryl Parcel Map . ~ . , 5. View from SWC facing north, 5. View from SWC of proj~cf: site facing south towarc[ neighboring propert~ ~'~Photo~raphs Exhibit Prov~ed 7. View from NEC of southern most parcel of SWC project site to- ward Beryl. View includes active chicken coup, weeds growing through gravel with dying on site trees. Tn the distance windrow Eucalyptus trees that must be removed to widen street. 8, View of citrus trees within center parcet from Beryl toward west side of residential with adjacent existinj~ barn and random boat and automobile materials. tSitePhotoGraphs by: Exhibit Provided Beryl Parce! 9. View of NWC of center parcel looking south behind barn of fruit trees and random material 10. View from SWC of Northern most p=rcet facing toward l~er~,l of abandoned material and overgrown bushes and fruit trees, Site Photooraohs Exhibit Provided by: Bell Parce~ Map~ ~ ~,~. 11. View from NWC of no~thern most proper~¥ toward Beryl with overgrown bushes growing onto abandon garage structure and ran- dom fruit trees in site. Automobile trailer, firewood, and random materials scattered throughout site. ~2, Close up of abova mentioned str=ct=r~, Hap :[3, View from structure in picture :[2 looking toward NWC of pro- ject site. Includes some of the fallen trees partially on neighbors property and various wood, weeds and citrus material in front of truck, boat, camper, camper shell and trailer. :[4. View of west side of house ne~c~ to abandoned garage of Northern most parcel. I Site Photooraohs Exhibit Provided Bell Panel ~ap 13eryl Parcel :[5. View from abandon structure toward from structure in picture looking toward NEC of project site toward Beryl. 16, View from NEC of project site a~ong Northern parcel of house and random plant material and trees. t Site Exhibit Provided by: Photoqraphs Ber~/I Parcel Map Pag¢~ 17. View from above NEC of project site adjacent to new develop- ment along Beryl facing south toward trees to be removed for street widening. ~.8. View from SEC of Northern Farce[ eiong Beryl of overgrown bushes, cacti, and street pole~ ~r~s that vvii~ be pa~ of street widening. Site Photo~3raohs Exhibit Providec[ by: 1 IBer~l Parcel h'lap ~ ~ ~ 147 ;[9. View from NEC of center parcel along Beryl facing south toward Eucalyptus and .lunipers to be removed for street widening. In the distance palm trees that will be relocated with large bush tree bor- dering theright side of photo, aabove NEC of project site adjacent to new development along Beryl facing south toward trees to be re- moved for street widening. 20, View from driveway of southern most parcel north along J~ery~ toward junipers and various shrubs. I Site Photoaraphs Exhibit Provided by: Beryl Parcel Map ~ ~. ~ . 21. View from driveway of Center parcel north of livestock structure facing north along Beryl toward Northern most parcel boundary de- picting overgrown plant and shrub material 22. View of NEC of center parcel toward barn structure from on north side of home. Site Photoaraphs Exhibit Provided by: Beryl Parcel Map ~ ~ ~ Pagel 1 ~ ~er~d Parce~ l~ap ~ View of home on center parcel east of barn, 24. View of livestock along Beryl of Southern most parcel adjacent to Center parcel I Site Photoqraphs Exhibit Provided by: [ Beryl Parcel Map Page 12 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644 2. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide a 3.33 acre property into 16 single-family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street - APN: 0202-751-36 and 37, and 0202-741-64. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low-Medium Residential 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North: Single-Family Residential South: Single-Family Residential East: Single-Family Residential West: Single-Family Residential 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Lisa Kuschel, Contract Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY - The following abbreviations are used in this report: ErR - Envirenmental Impact Report FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report NOx - Nitrogen Oxides ROG - Reactive Organic Gases PM~o - Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G - Urban Emissions Model /7/ Initial Study for SUBTT16644 City of Rancho Cucamonga Charles Joseph Associates Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant 'Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the'following pages. ( ) Aesthetics ( ) Agricultural Resources (v') Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (¢) Cultural Resources (¢) Geology/Soils ( ) Hazards & Hazardous (,/) HydrologyANater Quality Land Use/Planning Materials ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources Population/Housing ( ) Mineral Resources (¢) Noise Transportation/Traffic ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Utilities/Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (¢) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared by: (~~'~:~ / ~ ~///~/~'/~'~'~%'"~ Date: /-'7 Reviewed by~ ~.,...,,¢f/f/~ '-.-'~-'~'~,,' ~ Date: /7,Z Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: I a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (v') quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ( ) ( ) (,,') ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit 111-15. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. , c) The site is located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street, and is characterized by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project will create new light and glare; however, lighting will be that typical of single-family residential neighborhoods. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland ( ) ( ) ('/) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (,,') Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The project site is not within Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street and is characterized by single-family residences to the north, south, east, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 4 and west. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is not farmland and is located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street and is characterized by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west. The nearest agricultural use is more than one mile to the north from the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (v') () () concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General P}an FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary soumes, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 5 an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the foll~)wing mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or, high volume, Iow-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: · Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. · Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. · Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. * Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. · Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. · Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. · Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. - Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. /75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB~-I'16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 6 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nox, ROG, and PM10 would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The folJowing mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than- significant levels. e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 7 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () tv') through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected ( ) ( ) ( ) (v~) wetlands as defined by Section 404 ef the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () (v') () () biological resoumes, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (v') Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with single-family residences uses. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of the existing on-site structures. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resoumes; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are heritage trees on the project site. A tree survey prepared by David Evans and Associates on December 8, 2004, revealed a total of 18 trees satisfy at least one criteria of the City's criteria for heritage trees. Of these 18 trees, 12 trees are in poor health/form and recommended to be removed, 4 are in good health/form and recommended to be relocated, and 2 are in very good health/form and recommended to be protected if possible. The remaining trees on-site are fruit or Walnut/Pecan trees which are not considered heritage /77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB'I-I'16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 8 trees and are proposed to be removed. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1, The four Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting and reused within the project landscaping, 2, The Deodar Cedar (Survey Tag #1) and California Sycamore tree (Survey Tag #11) shall be preserved in place, if possible, by using curb adjacent sidewalk and meandering perimeter wall around tree drip line. If the City Engineer and City Planner determine that preservation in place is' not possible, the trees shall be removed and replaced. 3. The remaining 12 trees shall be removed and replaced. f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.57 b) Cause a substantial adverse change ~n the significance ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) of an amheological resource pursuant to § 15064.57 c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (,,,) ( ) ( ) resoume or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (,/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resoume" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known amheological sites or resoumes recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resoumes. The ~'ollowing mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: · Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. · Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. · Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. · Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 9 · Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEiR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstructior~ field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: · Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. · Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. · Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of existing on-site buirdings. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') on the most recent AIquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') liquefaction? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 10 iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or ( ) ( ) ( ) ~.,,) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of ( ) ( ) ( ) (~,) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-l, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1 mile south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 miles to the north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 8.4 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 10.9 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to tess-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMlo emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~0 emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Ramona Sandy Loam RmD SoiJ association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 11 d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Ramona Sandy Loam RmD Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are typically well drained, gently sloping alluvial fan deposits. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. HAZARDS ANDWASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (./) environment through the routine transpod, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (v') environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (v') acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (v') hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically intedere with an ( ) () () (-/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a Countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. i?1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 12 b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a Countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state.. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Fun~ional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within approximately 1/4 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school: Alta Loma High School. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () (v') () () substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site i ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 13 e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (v') mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (v') which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. b) According to CCWD, 43 pement of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CCWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it intedere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground sudace. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development Citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CCWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate, Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins, c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff once the site is developed; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB'I-r16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 14 Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rat6J and amount of sudace water runoff once the site is developed; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surtace flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in sudace water quality impacts. The site is more than one acre; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was prepared by Robert R. Otte, Civil Engineer. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maxi~num extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 15 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (-/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ( ) ( ) ( ) (-/) natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street and is characterized by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north, south, east, and west. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Low-Medium Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resoumes; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () ('/) resoume that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (~) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the GeneraJ Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-l, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact.. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 16 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (v') ( ) i( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (v') ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ( ) (v') ( ) ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ( ) ( ) ( ) '(,,') the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. The project site is subject to 210 Freeway traffic noise levels greater than the City's standard for residential of 60dBA according to General Plan Exhibit V-13. The Preliminary Acoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group on October 9, 2004, determined that acceptable noise levels for residential outdoor noise (60 dBA CNEL) and indoor noise (45 dBA CNEL) will be met under the City's General Plan standards. Mitigation for outdoor noise will be reduced to a level of less-than-significance using 6-foot high noise barriers along'Beryl Avenue and "windows closed" mitigation for interior noise will be reduced for select lots. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented. 1) Exterior Noise - A noise barrier of 6.0 feet in height shall be constructed along Beryl Street and wrap-around the northwest and southeast corners of the tract per Preliminary Acoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group. 2) Interior Noise - Mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning) and upgraded windows shall be included on some locations in home construction per Preliminary Acoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group. The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB']-r16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 17 developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The block wall proposed on the south property line shall be constructed as early as possible. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 6) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) See a) response above. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The site is located appreximatety 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (v') directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () (v') () necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ( ) ( ) (v') ( ) construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area. In the future it is likely that the three existing single-family homes will be demolished and replaced with 16 new single-family Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB'I-I'16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 18 homes. However, the growth inducing impact of these new homes is not considered significant because the surrounding area is already developed with single-family homes. No impacts are anticipated. b,c) The project site contains three existing single-family homes. In the future it is likely that these homes will be demolished and 16 new single-family homes will be constructed on the subject property. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,') c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,/) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) {,,') e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') Comments: a) The site, located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1/2 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 19 statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,") parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreationa~ facilities or require ( ) ( ) () the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the project site. This project is not proposing new housing that may cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. However, it is anticipated that 16 new single-family homes will eventually be constructed on the proposed tract of land. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in () () () (v') relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,,) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either ( ) ( ) ( ) (¢') an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (v') (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,,) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ( ) ( ) ( ) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (,,,,) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 20 The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per~ City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project will generate 16 two-way peak hour vehicle trips which is less than the 250 two- way peak hour trips for the non-retail threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards due to a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (v') applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (v') wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water ( ) ( ) ( ) (,,.-) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (v') project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (,,-) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 21 f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (v') regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Aha Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff'will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga County Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 22 17, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality ( ) ( ) ( ) (v') of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (,,,) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a~ project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will () ( ) () (v') cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) if the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under, the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be shod-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less than significant levels. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT16644 Charles Joseph Associates Page 23 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately anaiyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001 ) (T) Master Envirenmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH ~f88020115, certified January 4, 1989) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: ~ Date: ~. Print Name and Title: City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644 Public Review Period Closes: February 11,2004 Project Name: Project Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the west side of Beryl Avenue between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street - APN: 0202-751-36 and 37 and 0202-741-64. Project Description: A request to subdivide a 3.33 acre property into 16 single-family lots. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: [] The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. February 11, 2004 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. 04-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644, A SUBDIVISION OF 16 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS ON 3.33 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BERYL STREET BETWEEN MIGNONE'CI'E STREET AND CIELITO STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0202- 741-64, 0202-751-36 AND 37. A. Recitals. 1. Chades Joseph Associates filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 11, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on February 11,2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to 3.33 acres of vacant property located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street; and b. The project consists of the subdivision of 16 single-family lots; and c. The lot sizes range from 5,004 to 9,816 square feet, with an average lot size of 6,393 square feet; and d. The subdivision design, lot size, and dimensions are compatible with the Low-Medium District; and e. A Tree Removal Permit (DRC2003-01040) has been submitted because development of the site will require the removal and replacement of trees on-site; and f. The site will gain access from Beryl Street and include public improvements such as, but not limited to, new curb, sidewalk, and gutter; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-23 SUB'1-1'16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 2 a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, DevelOPment Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause sedous public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-23 SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 3 Planning Division: 1) Approval of the lot sizes and configuration takes into account the applicant's commitment that no minor exception or variance request for reduced setbacks associated with future house products will be requested. 2) Any minor exception or variance request for reduced setbacks associated with future house products shall not be granted. 3) Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040 is hereby approved for the removal of trees for the development of the site. The applicant/developer shall be required to remove and replace trees subject to Environmental Mitigation Number 1 under Biological Resources listed below. The Tree Removal Permit is valid for 60 days from the date of the issuance of building and/or grading permits. 4) All perimeter walls, including retaining walls, visible to the public shall be made of a decorative block material with decorative cap to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) The applicant shall obtain permission from adjacent property owners pdor to any off-site grading. En.qineedn,q Division: 1) Install private landscaping and irrigation systems in the parkways of comer Lots I and 16 along Beryl Street pdor to public improvements being accepted by the City (side-on to Artedal streets, where mar-on would be LMD). 2) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the futura undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Beryl Street shall be paid to the City prior to final map approval. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. 3) Transitions to existing curb and gutter (pavement) north and south of the project boundary shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent fTom the top of curb to 1-foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 5) Landscape Maintenance Distdct plans for Lots 12-14 shall incorporate attractive, Iow maintenance designs, compatible with or transitioning to adjacent landscape areas, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The maximum slope within publicly maintained landscape areas shall be 3:1. Where slopes occur, a 1-foot fiat area behind the sidewalk shall be provided. Slopes higher than 6 feet shall have a 2-foot wide fiat shelf at the top, along the base of the wall. Slope widths should be minimized through the use of 30-inch maximum height freestanding retaining walls /?7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-23 SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 4 and up to 4 feet of retaining beneath perimeter walls. Low maintenance wall treatments should be used. Planting areas for shrubs should have a minimum width of 3 feet, clear of wall footings. Trees will require wider planting areas, as determined by the City Engineer. 6) Grading information pertaining to publicly maintained areas, such as landscape easements, paseos, parks, etc., shall appear on plans approved by the City Engineer. 7) Driveways to Beryl Street shall be prohibited. 8) Internal 'A' Street, provide traffic stdping and signage as required. 9) Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centedine): 60 total feet on 'A' Street. 10) Install within existing right of way a route to school public sidewalk as pedestrian access as determined by the City Engineer. 11) Pdor to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated dudng construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 12) Provide 5 feet belween sidewalk and perimeter wall along Beryl Landscape Maintenance Area, top of slope benches (1 foot or 2 feet). Environmental Miti.qation: Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-23 SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 5 measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distdct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, Iow-pressure spray. 4)All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: · Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. · Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. · Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. · Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of won~ periods. · Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. · Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. · Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. · Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. /¢¢ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-23 SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 6 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/Iow polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1) The four Palm trees shall be preserved by transplanting and reused within the project landscaping. 2) The Deodar Cedar (Survey Tag #1) and California Sycamore tree (Survey Tag #11) shall be preserved in place, if possible, by using curb adjacent sidewalk and meandering perimeter wail around the tree drip line. If the City Engineer and City Planner determine that preservation in place is not possible, the trees shall be removed and replaced. 3) The remaining 12 trees shall be removed and replaced. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: · Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. · Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. · Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. · Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. · Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-23 SUB3-I'16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 7 within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with odginal illustrations, to the San Bemardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: · Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dudng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. · Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately diver[ construction and notify the monitor of the find. · Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bemardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403, 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~0 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dudng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RVVQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-23 SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 8 precast concrete lattice blocks and bdcks, ten-aces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. 2) Pdor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 3) Pdor to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Extedor noise - A noise barrier of 6.0 feet in height shall be constructed along Beryl Street and wrap-around the northwest and southeast comers of the tract per Preliminary Acoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group. 2) Intedor noise - Mechanical ventilation (i.e., air conditioning) and upgraded windows shall be included on some locations in home construction per Preliminary Acoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group. 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required bythe Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 5) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-23 SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES February 11, 2004 Page 9 6) *Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul reutes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVEDAND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: J Lamj?? Mcmiel, Vice Chairma~ ATTEST: I, Bred Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2004, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MAClAS ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: McPHAIL City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 · This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who wil~ take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT16644 Applicant: Charles Joseph Associates Initial Study Prepared by: Lisa Kuschel Date: January 27~ 2004 All construction equipment shall be maintained in good CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/CE C Reviewof Plans C 2 developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Iow emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 3erformance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high volume, Iow-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed pedormance standards BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: _ · Reestablish ground cover on the construction site CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 through seeding and watering. 1 of 7 Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large CE C Review of Plans NC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of CE C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of · work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in CE C Review of Plans A' 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established CE C Review of Plans A by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. · Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e,. CE C Reviewof Plans A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. · Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils CE C Review of Plans A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using turps or other suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other soil- CE C Reviewof Plans NC 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~0 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rure 403. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and CE C Review of Plans A/C 4 Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or cleanCE C Review of Plans NC 4 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Reviewof Plans NC 2/4 construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high efficiency/Iow polluting heat ng, air conditioning, appliances and water heaters. ",,5 2of7 2/4 The four Palm trees shall be preserved bytransplanting CP D During A 3/4 and reused within the project landscaping. Construction The Deodar Cedar (Survey Tag #1) and California CP D During A 3/4 Sycamore tree (Survey Tag #11) shall be preserved in Construction place, if possible, by using curb adjacent sidewalk and meandering perimeter wall around tree drip line. If the City Engineer and City Planner determine that preservation in place is not possible, the trees shall be removed and replaced. The remaining 12 trees shall be removed and replaced. CP D During A 3/4 Construction If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification Report without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. · Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new Report developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. · Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage. Report 3of7 Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project Report effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of ND 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and Report proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of A/D 4 field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall Report submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of ND 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with Report minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of ND 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Report elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify/the monitor of the find. · Submit a sun~n~,ary report to the City of Rancho CP D Reviewof D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a Report copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) Construction daily to reduce PMlo emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 4 of 7 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PMm Construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO/CE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions Construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO/CE C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PU~0 emissions. Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans NC 2/4 be integrated into the design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bricks, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of Plans NC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2000. 5of7 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the CE B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e. a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Exterior Noise - A noise barrier of 6.0 feet in height shall BO C During Plan A/C 4 be constructed along Beryl Street and wrap-around the Check and northwest and southeast corners of the tract per Construction Preliminary Acoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group. Interior Noise - Mechanical ventilation (i.e,, air BO C During Plan A/C 4 conditioning) and upgraded windows shall be included Check and on some locations in home construction per Preliminary Construction Acoustical Study prepared by RK Engineering Group. Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 8:00 p.m, and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. '""" 6of7 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the CP C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section Construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pedorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other timesmay be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise 'levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The block wall on the south property line shall be CP C During' A A constructed as early as possible in the first phase. Construction Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, Construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Eerson ~ ~!~ ~ ~ CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP - City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposih3r Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP ~ 7 - Citation ~.. 7of7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 SUBJECT: 16 LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF BERYL, BETWEEN MIGNONETTE AND CIELITO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements cornpletion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its .~/ / agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning ~ Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the city Engineer within 3 years from the date of .the approval C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ~/ / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~/ /__ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~ / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. Completion Date 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all __/ / other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 5. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the __/ /__ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 6. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner ___/ / including proper illumination. 7. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of any ..__/ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. D. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. E. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ' ___/ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1__/ / slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater /. / slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously ~ / maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied bythe buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in / / the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. F. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the L__/ issuance of building permits for any houses. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. SC-10-03 2 Completion Date 2. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of / /__ the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 3. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~ / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. G, Other Agencies 1. The applicant sha!l contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location L__/__ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: /___ __ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on.the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /__ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits ara required for fencing and/or walls. / / 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can / / contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements. SC-10-03 3 .2/5" Completion Date I. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be .~/ / marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of I the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant __ / ./ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / / recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / / through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. J. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances /_~/ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. ~ 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. /~ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / / K. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Califomia Building Code, City Grading ~/ /__ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to .~/ / perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, / / submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for /.__/__ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. SC-10-03 4 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets .__/ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from /.__ street centedine): · 60 total feet on 'A' Street /.__/ 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / / 4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the / / final map. 5. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be /. / dedicated to the City. M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped ~/ / areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / / curb ~ I Ac. I s,d,- I Drive I Street I Street I Comm I Median I Bike I StreetName JGutterJ Pvmt I walk IAppr. JLightslTreee[ Trail I Island JTraillOtherJ BerylStreet I X I X X I X X J 'A' Street X X X X X X 3. improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights /___ __ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _~/___ construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c.Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and intemonnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. SC-10-03 5 Completion Date e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with __/__/~ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be I /---/ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. g. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. __/__ __ 4.Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed /___/ legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. J Min. Size* Qty. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Beryl Street P.A. less than 5' Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat Tree 25' o.c. in 'A' Street Select appropriate tree from approved street tree list for Rancho Cucamonga. List each street as a separate line item within this legend. STREET TREES LISTED BELOW ARE TO APPEAR ON LMD PLANS, LISTED FOR REFERENCE ONLY - NOT TO APPEAR ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS. At rear yard lots Beryl Street P.A. 5' or greater Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 5' 20' o.c. 15 gal P.A. less than 5' Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat Tree 3' 25' o.c. 15 ga *TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be fumished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall / / be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: The three rear yard lots on Beryl Street (Lots 12-14) 2. Public ~andscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobbie or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. SC-10-03 6 Completion Date 3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the / developer until accepted by the City. O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~__ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the /.__ __ property from adjacent areas. 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured /~/ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. P, Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, /~ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. /~ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the ~/ / Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. / / Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all /. / new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE A'n'ACHED SC-10-03 7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS I PROJECT/FILE #: Subtt16644 APPLICANT NAME: Charles Joseph & Assoc. PROJECT NAME: Beryl Subdivision OCCUPANCY CLASS: Group R-3 LOCATION: 6896 Beryl FLOOR AREA (S): Subdivision only DATE: 10-21-2003 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Type V-N PLAN TYPE: SFR tract 16-1ot subdiv. FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazi PLANNER: Rick Fischer ANNEXATION: N/R Fire: Non-High Hazard Building permits will not be issued without approved water plans from CCWD and FCS. A fire flow letter will be required upon plan check submittal for the home construction. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT- STANDARD CONDITIONS & REQUIREMENTS - FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply. Water (fire) plans must be approved by RCFPD and CCWD prior to permit issuance 1. General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing and location of fire hydrants. Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in multi-family residential is 400-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150-feet. b. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 200 ft. c. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs the distance shall not exceed 150 ft. d. Fire hydrants are to be located: 1. At the entrance(s) to a project from the existing public roadways. This includes subdivisions and industrial parks, 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs. 5. The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control a fire. 6. Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any building. 2. The required fire flow for this project will be determined when the square footage of the homes are determined. This Fire flow requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix Ill-A, as amended. 3. Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 4. Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600~feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval. Include main size. FSC-2 Private (On-Site) Water and/or Fire Sprinkler Underground Plans for Fire Protection 1. Number of Fire Hydrants: Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof, subject to standard spacing and distribution requirements. FSC-4 Fire District Site Access- Technical Comments 1. Access Roadways Defined: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets, drive aisles and designated fire lanes. 2. Restricted Residential Access Mitigation: The installation of gates and restricted access to residential developments may necessitate installation of approved automatic fire sprinkler systems. This condition applies to projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, when the Fire District determines that gates, other means of restricting access or conditions delaying response exists. Contact the Fire Construction Services (909) 477- 2713 3. Restricted Residential Access: Gated or access for ali residential development shall comply with the following: a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device. Approved devices are available from Opticom (3M) and Tomar Electronics. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. b. A Knox Rapid Entry System Key Box is required to be installed adjacent to each gate in a Fire District approved location. The box shall be mounted where it is clearly visible and access is unobstructed. c. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. d. The key switch shall be located immediately adjacent to the Knox Box for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. Contact Building and Safety/Fire Construction Services (909) 477-2713 for inspection. FSC-5 Plan Submittal Required Notice Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 2000/2001 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical Code; Health and Safety Code; Public Resoumes Code; and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39, Guidelines and Standards. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Building permits will not be issued until the water (fire) plans are submitted and approved by CCWD and Fire Construction Services Complete the following: 1. Private/On-site Fire Hydrants: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards. .22/ 2. Private Fire Hydrants/On-site Installation: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). A representative of Fire Construction Services shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit final test and inspection report to the Fire Safety Division. 3. Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a planI showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project 4. Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division. Contact Water District to schedule testing. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following: 1 Private Fire Hydrants- Final Acceptance: Fer the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on- site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate. The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 2. Construction Access: Fire District access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches minimum clear height shall be provided. These minimum clearances shall be maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times, in accordance with Fire District Standards. Contact the Fire Safety Division (909) 477-2770 3. Phased Construction: Each phase shall be provided with approved Fire District access roadways. Dead- end roadways shall not exceed the maximum permitted by the Fire Code or Fire District standards. is in dire need of services for residents because the City now has a population of apl 150,000 and is still growing. He felt freeway-adjacent service stations make sense. He thought 1 they are one of the least impactive freeway-adjacent uses if there is appropriate security, believed it makes good planning sense. He said that staff does a terrific job of reviewing before they get to the Design Review Committee and the Committee checks everything, had faith in the job that staff and the Commission did. He wanted to be sure the on the south side of Highland Avenue is very dense. He felt it is an appropriate project for ~ site. He asked that corrections be made dudng construction if anything was missed, be sure it is the best and least intrusive project possible. Commissioner Fletcher did not feel it was appropriate to burden the applicant with · on-site secudty at this time and said he would for a review in 3 to 6 months for a discussion of on-site security. He noted there would be secudty cameras there 24 hours. He noted there a lot of service stations along that are not required to have on-site secudty and he preferred the matter be brought Commissioner Stewart stated she would not rescind her secudty she be on site and said it had been done at other locations. She added that the project be reviewed by the Planning Commission 6 month ~, including cdme statistics. Commissioner McPhail noted that some of the speakers ping be reviewed and she asked that the landscaping plans be brought to ti Review Committee as a Consent Calendar item. Brad Bullet, City Planner, cladfied the conditions the commission request. He said he heard a request that there be no that there be on-site secudty Fridays through Sundays from 8 p.m. and he suggested it be Commissioner Stewart agreed 6:00 a.m. be acceptable. Mr. Bullet indicated he heard ~ project be reviewed 6 months after opening to review crime statistics of the property g neighborhood issues, and that the final landscape plan be reviewed by the Design tittee. He observed that the Commission had correctly stated that the project could b 6 months if there are issues. He said that the residents would need to p the evidence that there is a problem and the Commission would then hold an evidenfiary Motion: Moved b~ seconded by McPhail, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution Use Permit DRC2003-00719 with the modifications listed by Mr. Bullet. Motion by the following vote: AYES: McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: - carded D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16644 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to subdivide 3.33 acres of land into 16 single-family lots in Planning Commission Minutes -8- February 11, 2004 "c " the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street - APN: 0202-741-64 and 0202-751-36 and 37. Related File: Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-01040. Commissioner McPhail recused herself because her firm receives remuneration from the applicant. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. He reported that a letter had been received from Jason Hoover, a resident who lives directly east of the project. He said the resident was concerned that the headlights from vehicles coming out of the cul-de-sac would be directed into his house. Mr. Coleman distributed an exhibit showing that Mr. Hoover's house is north of the north curb line of the cul-de-sac and commented that headlights of care exiting the cul-de-sac would shine at the northwest comer of the house immediately south of Mr. Hoover. He noted Mr. Hoover also raised concern that the street is not fully widened on the east side of Beryl Street where there are existing homes that were built pdor to City incorporation. Mr. Coleman stated that this development would completely widen the west side of Beryl Street, thus improving traffic flow on Beryl Street. He stated the third concern was with additional traffic the project will generate. Mr. Coleman stated that 16 homes should generate only about 50 vehicle tdps per day spread out over the day and staff believes that is not a significant amount of traffic. He thought Mr. Hoover's main concern has to do with existing traffic levels. He acknowledged there is traffic during peak hours from the high school on Base Line Road. Vice Chairman McNiel opened the public headng. Chuck Buquet, Chades Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the worked closely with staff to address all pertinent issues with respect to site configuration, taking into account improvements to the north and east and existing drainage facilities that run through the private street. He concurred with the conditions. He stated the project would improve traffic safety on Beryl Street when the street improvements are done. Jason Hoover, 6905 Beryl Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he was concemed that the headlights from cars will shine into his living room as they turn onto Beryl Street from the proposed tract. He worried that he would need to disclose that fact when he sells his property and it would negatively affect the value. He noted that the proposed average lot size is 6,393 square feet and he only has a 5,885 square foot lot. He observed there is a 7-foot jog into Beryl Street in front of his property, so that the street width will not meet the 66-foot minimum requirement regardless of any street improvements on the west side of Beryl Street. Vice Chairman McNiel asked for clarification on the width. Dan Coleman clarified that Mr. Hoover was referring to right-of-way width rather than pavement width. Mr. Hoover stated he was opposed to the development because he did not feel that he or any of the homeowners on the east side of Beryl should pay for anything for the development. Vice Chairman McNiel requested clarification on what the right-of-way would include. Mr. Coleman indicated it would include the sidewalk and parkway. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that the attachment to Mr. Hoover's letter shows the 58-foot street width in front of his house and to the south. He said there is an aggregate composite berm that is not at the ultimate location where the ultimate curb and gutter will go. He noted this development would improve the west side of Beryl Street and that would help out the situation and fulfill the applicant's conditions by completing the frontage improvements. He said the existing aggregate composite berm on the east side and the restriction in the street is an acceptable situation Planning Commission Minutes -9- February 11, 2004 that has been there for years and the 16 lots would not impose any further impact regarding the street situation. Vice Chairman McNiel stated the existing condition has been in place and it will not be changed unless there is further development. He said this development would improve the condition because it will make improvements on the west side of the street; therefore, it will be wider on the west side. Mr. Hoover stated that cars go well over 80 miles per hour going by on Beryl Street and he feared someone traveling north will mn off the read into one of the houses on the east side as they try to pass by on the right of a vehicle waiting to turn left into the development. Mr. Bouquet noted that the project will eliminate three existing driveway accesses onto Beryl Street and there will be no driveways allowed onto Beryl Street and the street will be widened over what · currently exists so it will be safer. Hearing no further testimony, Vice Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Stewart felt the improvements brought about by the development will far outweigh the negatives and she noted it is only 16 lots. She supported the project. She pointed out that the Design Review Committee observed that the lots are tight and, the Committee stressed that variances for setbacks would not be acceptable. Commissioner Fletcher felt the project was a straightforward map and it will complement the neighborhood. He believed that many times when a new development is contemplated, concerns raised are greater than the actuality. He stated that when Barratt Development built a large development across the street from his neighborhood, nearly all of the concerns raised by residents did not materialize. He said there are many more homes that were added in his neighborhood and it did not result in great traffic problems. He noted the project is only 16 lots and he did not think it would cause traffic problems. Vice Chairman McNiel stated that most of the time new development elevates the value of surrounding existing residences. Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Stewart, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Tentative Tract Map SUB'1-]'16644. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, McNIEL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: MACIAS ABSTAIN: McPHAIL - carried E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16651 ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A residential subdivisio purposes on 6.90 acres of land in the Foothill Boulevard-Cucamon ~ area within Subarea 1 of the Foothill Districts, located on the north ~ Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - APN: 0207-101-32, 33, ated Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2002-00441, Vadance DRC2003-00848, and Tree Removal Permit F. ENGINEERING (TUSCANY VILLAS AT REDHILL) - A request to increase Im building height and maximum retaining wall height permitted in the proposed 92 condominium development on 6.90 acres of land in the ~)nga Channel Mixed-Use area within Subarea I of the Foothill located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of the Cucamonga Channel - Planning Commission Minutes -10- February 11, 2004 RESOLUT,ON NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMONGA; CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 3.33 ACRES OF LAND INTO 16 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BERYL STREET BETWEEN MIGNONETTE STREET AND ClELITO STREET - APN: 0202-741-64, 0202-751-36 AND 37. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16644, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 11, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted their Resolution No. 04-23 approving the application. 3. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed to this City Council. 4. On March 17, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced meeting on March 17, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to 3.33 acres of property located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito Street. The property contains three homes that are proposed for demolition; and b. The application proposes to subdivide 3.33 acres of land into 16 single_family lots in the Low-Medium Residential District, located on the west side of Beryl Street between Mignonette Street and Cielito; and c. The proposed lot sizes range from 5,004 to 9,816 square feet, with an average lot size of 6,393 square feet; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. APPEAL OF SUBTT16644 - JASON HOOVER March 17, 2004 Page 2 d. The subdivision design, lot size, and dimensions are compatible with the Low-Medium District; and e. A Tree Removal Permit (DRC200301040) has been submitted because development of the site will require the removal and replacement of trees on-site; and f. The site will gain access from Beryl Street and include public improvements such as, but not limited to, new curb, sidewalk, and gutter; and g. The appellant, in their appeal letter dated January 30, 2004, raised concern with headlights of vehicles exiting from proposed Street "A" shining at his home at 6905 Beryl Street, which is north of the right-of-way of Street "A." The alignment of the proposed street for the new subdivision would not impact the appellant's property with respect to direct headlight glare. Only in the instance that a vehicle turning left when exiting the development would the property be impacted by any glare, and that, for a matter of seconds during the turning movement. The property contains three existing residences that currently have driveway access to Beryl Street; therefore, the impact of the proposed subdivision would be similar to that which exists currently. Additionally, the frequency of vehicle trips during nighttime hours is considerably less than during daytime hours. h. The appellant, in their appeal letter dated January 30, 2004, noted that the street has not been widened to its ultimate width in front of his property at 6905 Beryl Street. This development will improve the west side of Beryl Street to its ultimate width. Even though the east side of Beryl Street will remain without full pavement width, the Engineering Division has testified that sufficient width will be available for traffic. Beryl Street is a collector street and has left-turn movements at intersections and driveways throughout its corridor. i. The appellant, in their appeal letter dated January 30, 2004, stated that "the third matter is that the added traffic already incurred from the proposed development has made it extremely difficult to get out of my residence from 7;00 a.m. until 10:00 a.m." Since the development has not been approved, nor constructed, it is impossible for there to be any existing traffic caused by the proposed development. The Initial Study indicates that the proposed project would generate 16 two-way peak hour vehicle trips. This is not considered a significant increase for Beryl Street, a collector street. There is a City storm drain project on Carnelian Street, which may be causing additional traffic congestion. Staff has not received any other complaints about traffic congestion. This development of only 16 homes will not significantly impact traffic volumes on Beryl Street. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO, APPEAL OF SUBTT16644 - JASON HOOVER March 17, 2004 Page 3 e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal and upholds the Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract SUBTT16644 subject to all conditions as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 04-23 and the Standard Conditions attached thereto. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Charles Joseph Associates and Jason Hoover that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Charles Joseph Associates, and Jason Hoover at the address identified in City records. R A N C H O C U C a M 0 n G A COI~ H UNITY ~1~ QV1 CI~& DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE BACKGROUND In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed of park and recreation facility issues, programs, projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues, projects and programs occurring in both the Community Services Department and the Park Design/Development and Maintenance Sections of Engineering. A. PARKS AND FACILITIES UPDATE Central Park: · Construction advances were affected this past month by both wind and rain. However, work is proceeding well. The community center slab has been poured and the contractor is continuing to pour footings and foundations for the Senior Center side. Storm drain laterals are being installed and work has begun on the new Milliken entry. Central Park Landscape and Irrigation Project: · The landscape and irrigation package for the Central Park project was awarded to American Landscape on March 3r~. A pre-bid meeting is scheduled for early April and work is scheduled to begin in May. Rancho Cucamonga Cultural Center Parking Project: · Weather has been an issue this past month with both rain and wind. Even so, progress is good. All foundation/footings have been poured on the west structure, and the retaining walls are complete. The contractor has begun waterproofing the north and east retaining walls. The slab on grade is approximately 50% complete for the west structure and it is anticipated that deck material will be delivered by the end of March. On the east structure, footings and foundations are complete. The columns and shear walls, as well as the retaining walls will be complete by the end of March. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update Mamh 17, 2004 B, COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE Senior Services: · The Senior Center's annual St. Patrick Day Event will be held on Thursday, March 16, 10:0 a.m. Come and enjoy the great entertainment of singing sensation Gerri Iris Bryant, games, green food and good old Irish fun. · The Senior Advisory Committee will hold their next regular scheduled meeting on Monday, March 22n~, at 9:00 a.m. During the past month the Committee has worked tirelessly on projects relating to fundraising for various aspects of the new Senior Center as well as new programs and services for the entire community. · Journeys: A Travel Show & Dinner, March 26, 2004, 5:00 p.m. - Attention travelers! Join us as we embark on a virtual journey to all comers of the globe by land, air, and sea during a multi-media travel show featuring all the multi-day trips and tours offered by the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and Gadabout Tours, Inc. After the show, enjoy a delectable meal featuring a sampling of food from the various destinations featured in these trips. The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center, in cooperation with Gadabout Tours, Inc., offers hundreds of multi-day trips to destinations across the United States and ail over of the world. A representative from Gadabout Tours, Inc. will be available after the show and dinner to answer any questions. All potential travelers will receive a gift certificate to apply to multi- day trips with the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and Gadabout Tours, Inc. Presented by Gadabout Tours Inc. · Golden Follies Talent Showcase, March 27, 2004, 2:00 p.m. Join us at the Montclair Senior Center for the annual Golden Follies Talent Showcase featuring talented seniors from Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, Ontario, Chino, and Montclair. Tickets are now available at the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Human Services: · AARP Tax Aide - Volunteers from AARP will be preparing tax returns for all members of the community every Tuesday and Thursday, from 12:30 - 4:30 p.m., through April 15. Appointments are not necessary; guests will be assisted on a first come, first served basis. · Senior Help Line - The Help Line, (909) 596-1111 is a free service which will guide one through the maze of local senior services, with quick and easy information about hundreds of agencies. · Commodity Distribution - On the first Monday of every month the San Bernardino County Food Bank provides surplus food to Iow-income residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Food is packed, distributed and delivered by Senior Center volunteers. The food is distributed from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. or until the food runs out. · HICAP - A volunteer counselor from the State of California Health Insurance Counseling and March 4th and 18th, between 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. The HICAP program assists individuals and families with Medicare problems and other health insurance concerns. Trained and registered volunteer counselors provide objective information on Medicare, Medicare supplement insurance, managed care, long-term care planning and health insurance. Community education, individual counseling and some legal services are also City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 17, 2004 available and are administered through the San Bemardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services. · AARP Driver Safety Proqram - This eight-hour course taught in two four-hour sessions over two days is especially designed for motorists 50 years of age and over. After completing the class participants will receive a certificate issued by the DMV that enables them to apply for an insurance discount. Cost is $10 per person. Bring check to first class payable to "AARP". All participants must attend both classes to successfully complete the course. Call 477- 2780 to register. Classes are offered every month. · Bereavement Group - The Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center and Inland Hospice Association are offedng an Adult Bereavement Support Group. This group is open to all adults struggling to adjust to the loss of a loved one. Experienced staff members and facilitators of Inland Hospice Association lead the adult groups weekly. The support group meets every Monday from 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Northkirk Presbyterian Church, 9101 19th Street, in Rancho Cucamonga. · Safe Return Proqram - The Alzheimer's Association Safe Return Program assists in the safe and timely retum of individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. This service is provided for those individuals who tend to leave their residence and become lost. The Senior Center is a registration site and can provide the following services: identification products, national information and photo database, 24 hour toll-free cdsis line, fax alert notification system, local Alzheimer's Association chapter support and wandering behavior information and training. Trips and Tours: · 'q'he Odd Couple", - March 21, 2004. Join us to see Barbara Eden, ^merica's favorite 9enie and comedian, star in this unique rendition of Neii Simon's comedic masterpiece, at the beautiful Cerritos Center for the Performing Arts. A twist on the original, this version casts females in the lead roles. "The Odd Couple' is two friends (played by Barbara Eden and Rita McKenzie) who try sharin9 an apartment, but their ideas of housekeepin9 and lifestyles are as different as ni9ht and day. The Cerritos Center for the Performin9 Arts is the Southland's premier performin9 arts facility, offering 9reat performances in music, dance and theater. Owned and operated by the City of Cerritos, the Cerritos Center has been host to performances by Frank Sinatra, Whitney Houston, Clint Rlack, The Chieftains, Kathieen Battle, the Dance Theater of Harlem, the Royal Shakespeare Company and many others. Cost: $66.00 per person. · "The Glory of Easter" at the Crystal Cathedral, - ^pril 1, 2004. Join us as we journey to the world famous Crystal Cathedral. We'll start with a self-guided tour of the beautiful 9rounds and a visit to the 9irt shop for some shoppin9 (on your own). Then it's indoors to enjoy the truly amazin9 splendor of The Glory of Easter. The largest and most spectacular Passion play is breught to life through e×citin9 drama, song and pageantry. The cast of 100 volunteer actors is supported by professionals playin9 the lead roles of ,Jesus, Pilate, Mary Ma9dalene, Herod, Mary and more. Together they recreate the story of Passion Week including the triumphal entry into Jerusalem, Jesus cleansin9 the temp]e, the Last Supper, the trial, crucifixion, resurrection and ascension. Utilizing the latest in special effects, the Easter Pa9eant is famous for its lifelike recreation of earthquakes, thunder storms and li9htanin9 inside the all-9;ass buildin9. Flyin9 angels soar overhead while live animals City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 17, 2004 parade down the aisles. The passion play is an exciting interpretation of the week that changed the course of history forever. Cost: $42.00 per person. · Edwards Air Force Base, - April 2, 2004. Join us as we tour exhibits at Edwards Air Force Base. We'll start the tour at the Air Force Flight Test Center Museum. The new 12,000 square foot museum houses exhibits covering such diverse subjects as the formation of the ancient lakebeds, early homesteading, the first military uses of Edwards, flight testing during WWII, breaking the sound barrier, aviation records set at Edwards, testing the X-15, and the story of Glen Edwards, for whom the base was named. We'll continue to the Flight Line Tour, the hangar complex consists of Buildings 1861, 1864, 1870, and 1874, all of which were constructed in the mid-1950s along the stretch of the flight line known as Contractors' Row. After lunch at the NASA cafeteria (on your own), we'll continue with a tour of the Dryden Flight Research Center. All participants must provide the following information prior to March 25, 2004: last 6 digits of Social Security Number, date of birth, place of birth (City and State). All participants 16 years of age and older must have at least one form of photo identification to enter the base. Registration will be accepted through Wednesday, March 24, 2004. Cost: $26.00 per person. · Champions On Ice, - April 24, 2004. Travel with us to the beautiful Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim to watch the best in ice entertainment! Featuring the following performers: Michelle Kwan, Irina Slutskaya, Timothy Goebel, Evgeni Plushenko, Elvis Stojko, Sasha Cohen, Victor Petrenko, Philippe Candeloro, Surya Bonaly, Nicole Bobek, Oksana Kazakova and Artur Dmitriev, Naomi Lang and Peter Tchemyshev, Dan Hollander, Irina Grigorian, Vladimir Besedin and Oleksiy Polishchuk, Ann Patrice McDonough, Fumie Suguri, Tatiana Totmyanina and Maxim Marinin, Elena Sokolova. Enjoy souvenirs and refreshments on your own! Cast of skaters subject to change. Cost: $58.00 per person. Volunteer Services: · The table below summarizes the Department's usa.qe of volunteers for the month of January 2004 and year-to-date: Month: January 2004 YEAR TO DATE #of ~of Volunteers # of Hours i Value* Volunteers # of Hours $ Value* ~,dmin 5 15 210 5 15 210 Sports 372 2,827 39,578 372 2,827 39,578 Sr & Human 63 466 6,524 63 466 6,524 Services Special 7 14 198 7 14 196 Events ~'outh 81 180 2,520 81 180 2,520 Programs I 528 3,502 49,028 r 528 I 3,502 49,028 *Based on value of $14.00 per hour. 232. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 17, 2004 Teens: · The table below summarizes teen pm(Imm participation for the month of February 2004: Program Attendance/Participation - February 2004 Teen Center 1,033 Homework Room 17 TRAC Babysitting 57 participants; 14 volunteer hours TRAC Monthly Activities 26 participants Spruce Skate Facility 637 · The Spruce Park Skate Park Staff is making regular weekly visits to the skate park to promote safe skating by handing out donated chips and beverages free to the youth wearing their proper gear. Weekends still draw a crowd of all different ages. During the month of February and March staff will be making skate safety assemblies in 6 local elementary schools. The targeted age group for the assemblies will be the fourth grade, which is the age suggested by our Police Department. · Our annual Career Expo will be held on March 18t~ from 6:30 p.m. until 8:30 p.m. at the RC Family Sports Center. Currently there are 82 agencies confirmed to attend. This is an increase of 6 agencies from last year. This event is the perfect opportunity to explore any different professions. Obtain useful information about possible future careers, speak with professionals in the field, learn about apprenticeships, educational requirements and much more. · Beginning on April 1st the Department will be partnering with Lewis Apartment Communities to provide two programs for youngsters in the area. The first is an after school Teen Pro.qram for youth in grades 6th through 10th, This program will be offered at Sycamore Apartments Monday through Fdday from 2:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. Activities will include: a homework room complete with computers, games and activities. Cost for this program is $10.00 per week. In addition, a Kids Club will be implemented at Evergreen Apartments (Monday/VVednesday/Friday from 2:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.) and the Del Mar Apartments (Tuesday/Thursday from 2:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.). The Kids Club will offer free drop-in recreational programming, · Teens will be able to start off their vacation with a little bit of crazy at our Sprin(i Flinq Dance that will be held on April 3~u from 7:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. at the RC Family Sports Center. Cost: $3.00/advance purchase or $5.00 at the door. · Teens in grades 6~h through 12th can join us for a teen sprin,q break trip to Six Flags Magic Mountains. The trip will take place on April 7th from 8:30 a.r~. until 11:30 p.m. Cost ($25.00 per person) includes transportation, staff supervision and pdce of admission. Trip departs and returns to the RC Family Sports Center. Youth Activities: · Playschool registration for our winter session is currently at 669 students in 42 classes. All classes are filling up quickly with waiting lists developing for many of our classes. · The Mobile Recreation Program "Fun on the Run" is becoming a fun neighborhood event. The Fun on the Run Unit program is going very well this winter. This past month, 856 City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 17, 2004 children were served through the program at 5 park sites. The program runs from January 5t~ through March 26t~, Monday through Friday from 2:30 pm to 5:00 pm. The table bellows outlines the parks being visited during the reporting period: Weekday Park Location Monday Bear Gulch Park Tuesday Old Town Park Wednesday Hermosa Park Thursday Mountain View Park Friday Ellena Park · Mobile Recreation participants sent over 1,200 valentines to the troops in Iraq during the reporting period. This was the second annual Hearts and Huqs distribution that the youngsters have participated in. Youth Enrichment Services Grant Program: .IRST 5 BERNARDINO · The table below illustrates attendance/participation figures for programs/services provided through the YES Grant for the month of February 2004. Program Attendance/Participation FACTS Center Visits 1,720 Parent Education Classes 21 classes; 734participants Car Seat Checks 14 Child Care 139 Youth Sports: · The next Sports Advisory Committee meeting will take place on April 14, 2004. At this time fall/winter field allocation requests will be due for the timeframe of August 1, 2004 through January 31, 2005. · The table below summarizes youth sports activities for the reporting period: Activity # of Age/Gender # Teams Participants Pea Wee Soccer 350 3-5/boys & girls 35 Youth Basketball 950 6-16/boys & girls 122 Rancho Cucamonga Middle 67 6-17/boys & girls 7 School (RCMS) Youth Basketball Rancho Cucamonga Middle 21 3-5/boys & girls 2 School (RCMS) Pea Wee Basketball ' Cucamonga Middle School 200 6-14/boys & girls 7 (CMS) Youth Basketball Practice Cucamonga Middle School 120 8-Adult N/A (CMS) Judo City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 17, 2004 · A youth track and field meet will be held on April 3~ starting at 7:30 a.m. at Los Osos High School. Participating youngsters can qualify for the Inland Valley Municipal Athletic Association Track Meet to be held in late April or eady May. RC Family Sports Center: · The table below provides drop-in/open pla,/ participation at the Center for the reporting period: Activity # of Participants Adult Basketball 531 Youth Basketball 1,448 Adult Racquetball 387 Youth Racquetball 47 Adult Volleyball 31 Youth Volleyball 14 Jazzemise 1,193 · The table below summarizes organized adult activity at the Sports Center during the reporting period: Activity r # °f Participants ' AgelGender J# Teams100 Racquetball 15 AdultJMales N/A Basketball (full court) Adult/Males 10 Basketball (3-on-3) 40 Adult/Males 8 · The City will be hosting the Boys "C" Division Basketball Tournament on March 20th and 21st at the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center. Approximately 15 cities from the Inland Empire will be participating. In addition, JoAnn Gwynn our Youth Sports Recreation Coordinator will be chairing the entire tournament that will be accommodating over 70 teams in the cities of Fontana, Colton, Riverside and Rancho Cucamonga. Adult Sports: · Four (4) adult softball tournaments are scheduled at the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex during the month of March 2004. · Thirty-six (36) adults are participating in our tennis leaques. · The table below summarizes adult sports activities at the Epicenter for the reporting period: Activity # of Participants # Teams Gender Softball 2,400 150 Males/Females Soccer 832 52 Males/Females Flag Football 100 10 Males Non-Profit Sports Organizations: · Bi-annually, the Community Services Department, through the Sports Advisory Committee allocates sport fields for non-profit orqanized youth sport leaq-e~ For the reporting period, City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 17, 2004 10 non-profit sport groups utilized 18 City parks and had 59,907 participants and spectators enjoying our parks during both practices and game times. Special Events: · Northtown Housing Development Corporation and the Community Services Department are meeting to plan this year's Cinco de Mayo celebration that will take place on Saturday, May 1, 2004, at Old Town Park. The event will run from 12:00 noon until 5:00 p.m. and will include traditional mariachi bands, dancers, face painting, activities and game booths for youngsters, authentic Mexican food and a car show. · Staff is currently programming our upcoming summer events for 2004 including: the 4t~ of July celebration, Concerts in the Park and the Movies in the Park series. Performing and Cultural Arts: A cast of nearly 60 community members will grace the Alta Loma High School stage on March 25t~ through 28th bringing the biblical story of Joseph and his "coat of many colors" to vibrant life in the Andrew Lloyd Webber musical "Joseph and the Amazinq Technicolor~) Dreamcoat". With the majority of the cast members from Rancho Cucamonga, this particular show also drew talent from all over the region including Upland, Ontario, Fontana, Glendora, Monrovia, Chino Hills, Pomona and Arcadia. "Joseph" is the City's 6th community theatre production and the first with a priority to focus on the talents of teens and young adults, in addition to the teens and adults who make up the show's many characters, the production also features a 21-member children's choir who fill out the vocal sound. Tickets for the production are $8.00 per person and are available in advance at the Civic Center or Lions East Community Center. The box office will open 45-minutes before curtain on the day of the shows. Evening show times begin at 7:30 p.m. with a Sunday matinee performance at 2:00 p.m. This show is generously sponsored by the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation and the Rotary Club of Rancho Cucamonga. · James V. Curetalo Performinq Arts Memorial Scholarship Fund - Youth between the ages of 8 and 18 can now apply for scholarship funding in which to participate in a number of the City's performing arts classes, programs and productions. Awards in the amount of $200 each will be given to selected youth who best express their desire to develop their performing arts talents and experiences. Information on this new scholarship fund is available in the spring issue of The Grapevine and on our City's website at www. RCPark.com. Park and Facilities: · The table below and on the next page provides information on park picnic shelters and special use facilities for the month of February 2004. Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use Applications of Processed Rentals Red Hill Community Park Picnic 445 12 13 48 Shelters City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update March 17, 2004 Location/Facility Attendance Number of Number Hours of Use Applications of Processed Rentals Heritage Community 310 7 7 24 Park Picnic Shelters Hermosa Park Picnic Shelter 90 3 3 11 Milliken Park Picnic Shelter 85 4 4 15 Coyote Canyon Picnic Shelter 0 0 0 0 Civic Center Courtyard* 0 0 0 0 Amphitheater 40 1 1 5 Equestrian 60 3 3 6.5 Heritage Park Equestrian Center: · Equestrian Center usa.qe for the month of March 2004 is shown in the table below: r~rou~ Date Event/TimeFrame r Equestrian Patrol March 11t" Meeting/6:00-9:00 p.m. Alta Loma Riding Club March 14t" Playdays/9:00-3:00 p.m. 4-H Club March 15t" General Meeting/7:00-9:00 p.m. Facilities: · The table below displays buildinq rentals and recreation contract class attendance numbem for the month of February 2004. Activity Program Numbers February Attendance Lions East Rentals 134 bookings 1,742 Lions East Building 502 facility hours 8,204 Lions West Rentals 200 bookings 2,672 Lions West Building 2,470 facility hours 6,761 Winter Session Recreation 308 classes 8,163 Contract Classes · Staff is continuing to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center to address maintenance needs and programming. Our local groups are very cooperative and supportive of the City's efforts. · Park monitors keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents in need of assistance. Park and Recreation Commission: · The next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission is scheduled for March 18, 2004. At this meeting the following items are scheduled to be discussed/acted upon by the Commission: > Update on Senior Advisory Committee. City Council Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update Mamh 17, 2004 Update on Sports Advisory Committee. Update on Central Park Project. Update on Victoda Gardens Cultural Center Project. Annual review of Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendations Study relating to inventory and facility needs analysis. > Commission discussion regarding attendance at the California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Training Conference held March 10-13, 2004. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: · The Rancho Cucemonqa Community Foundation met on March 9, 2004. The following items were discussed/acted upon at this meeting. Update on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center Project. Further refinement of restructuring options for the Community Foundation Board. Report and Discussion of Board Member Goals and Objectives for the PAL Fundraising Campaign. > Refinement of parameters regarding the Community Foundation's Gala. > Foundation member update and discussion on solicitation efforts for the PAL Fundraising Campaign. Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter: · No rental activity/rental took place during the reporting pedod. · Staff is in the process of working with the following applicants for future activities at the Epicenter: > Tommy and Mike Productions - Car Sale - April 1, 2004 through April 5, 2004 - Epicenter Special Event Area. > Abundant Living Family Church - Easter Services - April 10 and 11th, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium and Baseball Fields. > Mt. Baldy Boy Scouts of America - Scout-O-Rama - April 30 - May 2nd, 2004 - Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex - Soccer Fields. > Maintenance Superintendents Association - Mini Equipment Show - May 27, 2004 - Epicenter Parking Lots A & B. ~, RC Police Department - Bike Rodeo - June 5, 2004 - Epicenter Special Event Area. ), Daily Bulletin/Quakes/City - Ali-Star Game - June 8, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium. > Rancho Cucamonga High School - Graduation - June 10, 2004 - Epicenter Stadium. Kevin I~ *~Ardle ~ (~' Joe O'Neil Communit Services Director City Engineer htCOMMSERV~Council&Boards~CityCouncil~StaffRepo~fst2OO4~update3.17.04, doc