No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/06/01 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive + Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 AGENDAS Redevelopment Agency City Council REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays ~- 7:00 p.m. JUNE 1, 2005 AGENCY~ BOARD & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS William J. Alexander .................... Mayor Diane Williams ............... Mayor Pro Tern Rex Gutierrez ............................ Member L. Dennis Michael ..................... Member Sam Spagnolo .......................... Member Jack Lam ......................... City Manager James L. Markman ............. City Attorney Debra J. Adams ..................... City Clerk 5:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. ORDER OF BUSINESS Closed Session ................... Tapia Conference Room Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting... Council Chambers Regular City Council Meeting ............. Council Chambers INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ..~I~NCHO ~.~UC,~MONC,~ TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL The City Council encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the City Council on any agenda item. Please sign in on the clipboard located at the desk behind the staff table. It is important to list your name, address and phone number. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Communications". There is opportunity to speak under this section at the beginning and the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. To address the City Council, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. All items to be placed on a City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter and the Public Library. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the sign in desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVEBROADCAST Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci,rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers Located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of City Council agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww, ci. rancho-cucamonga, ca. us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. UCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 1 II A. CALL TO ORDER I Roll Call: Alexander __, Gutierrez __, Michael__, Spagnolo__, and Williams__. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Announcement by Fire Chief Bryan regarding reporting of emergencies by cell phone. 2. Presentation of California Park and Recreation Society District XI 2005 Layman's Award to Elmer and Wilma Steeve of Rancho Cucamonga. Presentation of a Proclamation in recognition of National Trails Day, June 4, 2005. A Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to resident Megan Ridley in honor of her recent recognition at the Jurupa Rodeo. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: April 6, 2005 April 20, 2005 April 26, 2005 (Special Meeting) May 4, 2005 2. Approval of Warrants, Check Register 5/11/05 through 5/24/05 and 1 Payroll 5/11/05 through 5/24/05, for a total amount of $4,822,507.47. cRmC.o UC, AMONG^ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY HALL, 10500 C~VlC CENTER DRIVE 2 Approval to purchase an HP Design Jet 5550PS 60-inch plotter from Americomp Infosystems utilizing a Western States Contracting Alliance Contract, in the amount of $18,550, and authorization to appropriate $18,550 from the Computer Equipment Replacement Fund into Acct. No. 1714001-5605. Approval of a change order in the amount of $30,000 with Butsko Utility Design, Inc. for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area, to be funded from Acct. No. 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. Approval of single source replacement purchase of one Leeboy 7000 Asphalt Paver from Nixon-Egli Equipment Company of Santa Fe Springs, California in the amount of $67,343.75 and the replacement purchase of a Zieman Model 2650 Paver Special Trailer from Scott Equipment of Fontana, California in the amount of $11,046.80 funded from Account No. 1712001-5603 (Equipment Replacement fund) approved in the 2004-2005 budget. Approval of the single source purchase of a replacement traffic signal controller assembly for the traffic signals at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Fairmont Drive from Econolite Control Products, Inc., in the amount of $28,865.14, to be funded from Capital Improvement Funds, Acct. No. 11703035300 (Contract Services), and appropriate an additional $29,000.00 from 170 (Gas Tax 2105/Prop 111) Fund Balance to Acct. No. 11703035300. Approval of an appropriation in the amount of $140,000 from Measure 'T' fund balance to Acct. No. 11763035650 for the East Avenue and Base Line Road Improvements in cooperation with the City of Fontana. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $278,100.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Pouk & Steinle, Inc., (CO 05-048) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $27,810.00, for the Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel 12 KV Electrical Distribution and Onsite System Cabling, Connections, Equipment Project, to be funded from Municipal Utility funds, Account No. 17053035650/14857505-0 and Account No. 17053035650/1487705-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $7,000.00 to Account No. 17053035650/1485705-0 from Municipal Utility fund balance. Approval to accept the bids and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $119,762.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Fleming Environmental, Inc., (CO 05-049) and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $11,976.20, for the Lake Pump Equipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park, to be funded from PD 85 funds, Account No. 18483035650/1224848-0. 22 23 25 29 33 35 39  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY 3 ~R.~cHo HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE UGAMONOA 10. 11. 12. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract No. 14759-1 located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue submitted by Pulte Homes -APN: 226-102-17. RESOLUTION NO. 05-172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14759-1 RESOLUTION NO. 05-173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 14759-1 Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Ne. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 16461, located on laomosa Street, west of Hellman Avenue, submitted by Patricia Prutting, Delbert and Judy Feltis and James and Bernice Dunn. RESOLUTION NO. 05-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP 16461, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 16461 Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities for Public Street Improvements, Monumentation Cash Deposit, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16297, located at the corner east of White Oak Avenue and Elm Street, submitted by Lot Number One Partnership, LLC. 42 44 45 52 55 56 64 R~cHo CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CITY HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 4 13. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 05-176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16297, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16297 Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities for Public Street Improvements, Monumentation Cash Deposit, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 16507, located on both Rochester Avenue and Boston Place, north of Jersey Boulevard, submitted by LC Rochester Avenue, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16507, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT RESOLUTION NO. 05-179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16507 Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for DRC2005-00088, located on 12735 Banyan Street, east of Greenwood Place submitted by Michael Helm. 66 67 74 76 77 84 cR~C.o UCAMONG^ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 10500 Civic CENTER DRIVE 5 15. 16. 17. RESOLUTION NO. 05-180 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2005-00088 RESOLUTION NO. 05-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR DRC2005-00088 Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Driveway Easement, Construction and Maintenance Agreement and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape maintenance District no. 3b and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 3 for Parcel Map No. 16237 located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard submitted by B/DC Partners, LP. A California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 05-182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16237, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, DRIVEWAY EASEMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES RESOLUTION NO. 05-183 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 16237 Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15492, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15174, located on the southwest corner of Church Street and Rochester Avenue submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles, Inc. 86 87 95 97 98 105 107  CITY COUNCIL AGENDA , JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 6 [~J'~cao HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ~,UCAMONGA 18. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 15902, 109 located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street submitted by US Home Corporation. 19. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 111 16042, located at the southwest corner of 8th Street and Center Avenue submitted by Park Place Rancho Cucamonga, LLC. 20. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16398, 113 located at the northwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 7th Street submitted by W. F. Construction, Inc. 21. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond retained as Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16189, located on the east 115 side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street submitted by Aphrck, LLC. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES ] The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. The Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No items submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA 117 FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS %~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ~ JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 7 CHO HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE UCAMONGA ORDINANCE NO. 743 (first reading) 119 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA1 AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CiTY CODE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input, 1. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL 122 LEVY WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1, (MASI PLAZA) AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1999-1 WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 05-184 124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 2. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY 129 FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 05-185 131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) 3. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW 138 ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE cR~c~o UCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS~ CiTY HALL~ 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 8 RESOLUTION NO. 05-186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2, ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B RESOLUTION NO. 05-187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2, ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A RESOLUTION NO. 05-188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1,2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3, ZONE 7), SERIES B WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 05-189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3, ZONE 7), SERIES B 140 '149 151 159 161 171 '173 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY 9 HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVAL TO SET AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2), SERIES A WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 05-190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & S), SERIES A APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) RESOLUTION NO. 05-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) 9. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 05-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10. APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RESOLUTION NO. 05-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS 180 183 197 199 206 208 212 214 p~ANC HO CUCAMONO^ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 1, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. THE MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 10500 C~WC CENTER DRIVE 10 11. CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE iN THE 225 AMOUNT OF $66,149.00 AWARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 2004), ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, INTO ACCT. NO. 1380000-4740 (GRANT INCOME); AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $440.00 INTO ACCT. NO. 1380501-5152 (COMPUTER SOFTWARE), $5,800.00 INTO ACCT. NO. 1380501-5200 (OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE), AND $59,909.00 INTO ACCT. NO. 1380501-5603 (CAPITAL OUTLAY- EQUIPMENT); AND APPROVAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES FROM COMSERCO COMMUNICATIONS, OF RIVERSIDE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $59,452.07, FUNDED $434.81 FROM ACCT. NO. 1380501-5152, $911.42 FROM ACCT. NO. 1380501-5200, AND $59,452.07 FROM ACCT. NO. 1380501-5603. 12. UPDATE ON ANIMALSERVlCES (Oral) 13. CONSIDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 229 WITH NO KILL SOLUTIONS (CO 05-050) FOR ANIMAL SERVICES CONSULTATION iN THE AMOUNT OF $21,000, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCT. NO. 1001-104-5300. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS Il The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) 2. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (oral report) I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 26, 2005, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954,2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. April 6, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES I1 ^. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, April 6, 2005, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; and James Markman, City Attorney. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item. B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8517 GROVE AND VACANT LOT AT 8547 GROVE, PARCEL NOS. 0207-222 AND 0207-222-05; LESSEE, PAMELA EASTER, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER AND KIMBERLY THOMAS, MANAGEMENT ANALYST III, AND PROPERTY OWNER, HOWARD GEIVETT, NEGOTIATING PARTIES; REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT AND DIRECTION ON RELEASE/OPTION TO PURCHASE, PER THE SALE OF PREMISES BY LANDLORD; PER RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL, IN LEASE AGREEMENT CO 04-015 - CITY B2. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CITY MANAGER PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED TO THE APRIL 20, 2005 MEETING. II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No communication was made on the closed session item. [[ D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The closed session began at 5:35 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 2 The closed session recessed at 6:45 p.m. with no action taken. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meetinq [[ A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, April 6, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:13 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney; Mike Nelson, Sr. Redevelopment Director; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Shelly Munson, Information Systems Specialist; Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; John Thomas, Plan Check Manager; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; Bill Pallotto, Recreation Supervisor; J6nnifer Hunt, Recreation Coordinator; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. l] B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I B1. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April as "Child Abuse Prevention Month." Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented the Proclamation to Anthony Rubio. Mr. Rubio informed the Council about their program. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 10 - 16 as "National Crime Victims' Rights Week." Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented the Proclamation to Agnes Gibboney. Ms. Gibboney advised the Council about an event they will have in front of City Hall of April 14. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 10 - 16 as "National Library Week." Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented the Proclamation to Ray Wimberly, President of the Library Board. President Wimberly thanked the Council for the oppodunity to open the Library again on Friday's beginning April 15. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 3 Deborah Clark, Library Director, thanked the Council for assisting with getting the Library open on Friday's. [I C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I C1. Jim Townsend, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Fighters Association, commented on the badge ceremony that took place honoring Deputy Ron Ives in San Bernardino and thanked Captain Ortiz and the City Council for attending. He also mentioned that last week Applebees sponsored an event for Fire Fighter Tom Barrilla who had recently been critically injured in an automobile accident. He thanked Guy White for his assistance in organizing this event. He also thanked the City Council for their support. C2. Melanie Ingram commented on the Child Abuse Prevention Proclamation presented tonight and added she has been involved with this effort in a previous job. She stated she was glad to see Agnes Gibboney here and commented on the tragedy she suffered several years ago. She also commented on an article in the newspaper about Jim Erwin of CEBA being investigated because of his present dealings in the union. She hoped CEBA would not get involved in Rancho Cucamonga's elections in 2006. She commented on LAFCO annexing property and what she had read in the newspaper about their process. C3. Leslie Grimes wanted to make sure the alcohol in the parks issue would be opened up for the public to speak about and would like the opportunity to speak after the City Council has made their comments. She commented on it being Child Abuse Prevention Week and added it is also Autism Awareness Month. She asked people to donate to charities. C4. Nicole Myerchin asked if items 13 and 14 would be opened up for public comment. She stated she recently attended a "no kill" conference in San Diego. She talked about the topics that were discussed. She stated she was sorry that no one from San Bernardino County was there. She commented on the mobile vet program and stated that Upland is involved in this. She stated our shelter does not want to get involved in this. She felt the County could afford to pay for this program. She stated Supervisor Paul Biane had mentioned the County contributes to the animal shelter operations, but that she did not find it in the County's budget. She asked that he provide this information to her. C5. Bill McCliman commented on Pope John Paul II's ethics and morals. He stated in a couple of weeks the fire fighters contract will be voted on and felt the Council should be working with the fire fighters to get this resolved so it will help the City. He stated he has heard there could be an impasse on the contract. He asked the City Council do the right thing for the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. ]l D. CONSENT CALENDAR I Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there is a typo on Consent Calendar item #26. He stated the correct amount should read $114,986.00 instead of $144,986.00. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 4 D1. Approval of Minutes: March 2, 2005 March 14, 2005 (Special Study Session) March 16, 2005 (Special Workshop) March 16, 2005 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register March 9 through March 29, 2005, and Payroll ending March 29, 2005, for the total amount of $6,032,081.81. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the ;'Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of the "Foothill Boulevard Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue," to be funded from Acct. No. 10250015650/1506025-1 (General Fund). RESOLUTION NO. 05-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval of plans and specifications for the "Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Generator Enclosure" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids," to be funded from Capital Reserves Acct. No. 1025001-5602 as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 05-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAMILY SPORTS CENTER GENERATOR ENCLOSURE" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval of plans and specifications for the "Lake Pump Equipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park," and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids," to be funded from PD 85 Acct. No. 1848303-5650/1224848-0 as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 05-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "LAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the "Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue (Phase II)," to be funded from Acct. No. 11103165650/1520110. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 05-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL CONSTRUCTION FROM AMETHYST AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE (PHASE II), IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D7. Approval of final Tract Map 16279 located on the north and south sides of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues, submitted by Toll Brothers Land Development- APN: 227-472-28 RESOLUTION NO. 05-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 16279 D8. Approval of a change order in an amount of $210,800.00 for the installation of additional transformers, switches, and service line extensions for Victoria Gateway, Foothill Crossing and Victoria Gardens for new hookups, and approval to increase the award to the Pouk & Steinle Contract (CO 03- 127) by an amount of $210,800.00 from Acct. No. 17053035650/1382705-0. D9. Approval of a request to Summarily Vacate Excess Street Right-of-Way located on the south haf of 7th Street, east of the cul-de-sac terminus of 7th Street and east of Archibald Avenue, V-199 - APN: 209- 211-46. RESOLUTION NO. 05-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS STREET EASEMENT RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH HALF OF 7TM STREET, EAST OF THE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS OF 7TM STREET AND EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE D10. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for 5938 Etiwanda Avenue, located north of Banyan Street, submitted by Pacific Crest Communities, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR 5938 ETIWANDA AVENUE RESOLUTION NO. 05-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR 5938 ETIWANDA AVENUE City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 6 D11. Approval to award an ann'ual contract for the purchase of asphalt materials from Holliday Rock (CO 05-024) in the amount of $80,000, to be funded from Acct. No. 1001316-5200 for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2004/2005, with the option to renew for Fiscal Year 2006/2007. D12. Approval of a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 05-025) from John C. and Stephanie J. Larson for the property located at 8887 Hidden Farm Road (APN: 1061-271-26-0000). RESOLUTION NO. 05-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REAL PROPERTY CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOHN C. AND STEPHANIE J. LARSON AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME D13. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 14496-1, located on the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Granite Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 05-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14496-1 D14. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16370, located on the northwest corner of Church Street and Arbor Lane, submitted by US Homes Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16370 D15. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16371, located on the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road, submitted by US Homes Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 05-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16371 D16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for TR 16432, located at the southwest corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Street, submitted by Cucamonga Ventures, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 05-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TR 16432 D17. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2001-00805, located at 10863 and 10865 Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Ralph Karubian, Sol Stone, Marcia Stone, Charles Karubian and Laurence Karubian. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 05-130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2001-00805 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D18. Approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee cash deposit for DRC2002-00187, located on the west side of Center Avenue, south of 7th Street, submitted .by 9101 Center Avenue Associates, LLC. D19. Approval to accept Improvements, release all bonds and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 12959-1 (Railroad Crossings), located at the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Arrow Route, submitted by Cappelino & Associates. RESOLUTION NO. 05-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12959-1 (RAILROAD CROSSINGS) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D20. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 15724, located on the south side of Terra Vista Parkway, east of Coyote Canyon Park, submitted by KB Homes Greater Los Angeles, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 05-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15724 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D21. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. SS4081 in the amount of $613,419.25 for the Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 02-075. D22. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, No. CD 6003, in the amount of $128,128.00 for the Etiwanda Avenue Bike Lane and Sidewalk Improvement, Contract No. 03-047. D23. Approval to accept the Improvements in Phase 3A of Community Facilities District 2003-01, including Street, Storm Drain, Water Main, Traffic Signals and Fiber Optic Conduits, Contract No. 03-135 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $2,899,109.03. RESOLUTION NO. 05-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE IMPROVEMENTS IN PHASE 3A OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01, INCLUDING STREET, STORM DRAIN, WATER MAIN, TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND FIBER OPTIC CONDUITS, CONTRACT NO. 03-135 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 8 D24. Approval to accept the Landscaping and Sidewalk in Phase lA of Community Facilities District 2001-01, Contract No. 04-011 as complete, approval to appropriate $37,051.51 to Acct. No. 16123035650/1442612-0 from CFD 2001-01 I Fund balance, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Materials Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $946,815.75. RESOLUTION NO. 05-134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK IN PHASE lA OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001~01, CONTRACT NO. 04-011 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D25. Approval to accept Phases lB(B), 3B(A), and 3B(B) of CFD's 2001-01 and 2003-01 for Street, Storm Drain and related improvements on Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 04-041 as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $1,695,814.62. RESOLUTION NO. 05-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PHASES lB(B), 3B(A) AND 3B(B) OF CFD'S 2001-01 AND 2003-01 FOR STREET, STORM DRAIN AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 04-041 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D26. Approval for the replacement purchase of one (1) hazardous materials vehicle from KME Fire Apparatus of Ontario, CA, in the amount of $293,301.97, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 1380501-5604 (Department of Homeland Security Grant) $!~,9~6.99 $1'14,986.00 and 2505801-5604 (Fire Protection- RDA Capital Outlay - Vehicle) $178,315.97. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff repods contained within the Consent Calendar as corrected and with the exception of item D6. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D6, . Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the "Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Construction from Amethyst Avenue to Archibald Avenue (Phase II)," to be funded from Acct. No. 11103165650/1520110. Councilmember Williams pointed out that Phase I has not been done yet, but that it is just starting. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to approve item D6. Motion carried unanimously 5- 0. ITEMS G1 AND 12 WERE DISCUSSED AT THIS TIME. THE MINUTES WILL REMAIN IN AGENDA ORDER. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 9 II ~. CONSENT ORDINANCES [ No Items Submitted. II ,~. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ] Fl. RECONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE THAT ADOPTS BY REFERENCE COUNTY ORDINANCE 3930 RELATING TO THE INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENT,g A staff report was presented by Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager. Mayor Alexander inquired of Terri Williams, County Health Department, if every violation is one point taken off the score. Terri Williams, County Health Department, stated some violations are only one point. Mayor Alexander felt the behavior of the people doing the inspections should be monitored so they do not go overboard with noting violations. Councilmember Gutierrez asked about the timeframe to correct a problem. Terri Williams, County Health Department, explained this process. Councilmember Michael asked if this was a State system or a County system that is followed. Terri Williams, County Health Department, stated it is a County system. She stated the County is always open to any suggestions to make the program as successful as possible. Councilmember Michael clarified that the last time this was considered, there might have been a misconception by the public that inspections would not continue since the Council did not approve the Ordinance at that time. He added this is incorrect and that inspections are continuing regardless of Ordinance approval or not. He asked if this is not approved is there the possibility that the plaques would not be given out. Terri Williams, County Health Department, stated that is a possibility. Mayor Alexander indicated he did not feel this was fair because people do pay for these inspections. Councilmember Williams inquired about the cost of an inspection. Terri Williams, County Health Department, stated approximately $350 per year. Councilmember Williams stated she wished the City had been brought into this in the beginning instead of Councilmember Spagnolo stated he would rather have a pass or fail system. He stated he saw on the Internet that the "C" ratings are still allowed to operate. He did not agree with this. He stated he wished this was more user friendly. Mayor Alexander stated he was glad this would be looked at and evaluated in one year. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 10 Terri Williams, County Health Department, stated she is happy to work with the Council and Chamber. She stated she has not received complaints about the inspectors in her department. She stated this is supposed to be a fair and accurate program. She stated she is willing to work with the cities to make this a better program. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Carol Douglas stated she is grateful this is on the agenda tonight. She stated it isn't always possible to look up on the Internet what a restaurant is graded. She stated restaurants are supposed to provide to the public upon request their letter grade. She felt the inspections and letter grading were two different issues. She hoped the posting of the letter grades would have a positive effect and that it would be an incentive for restaurants to do a good job. Leslie Grimes stated her concern is the punitive factor. She did not feel some of the minor issues the inspector takes points off for should affect the grade. She stated what she is concerned about is if she will get sick from the food served at a restaurant. She did not feel this should be a tool to punish people. Jim Moffit, a resident in Rancho Cucamonga for 30 years, did not feel if a restaurant gets less than an "A" grade it should be shut down as was indicated in the newspaper. He felt non-food item corrections should be taken out of the grading system. There being no further input, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Michael stated he would like for the County not to wait a year to reinspect a restaurant, and to help them be more successful. He felt if there were corrections that could be made immediately, that this should be considered. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he agreed and did not feel the businesses should have to wait one year for another inspection. He felt the Ordinance should be made more user friendly. Councilmember Gutierrez stated they are here to protect the best interest of all the residents. He asked that the County not weigh so heavily those items that are non-food related. He asked if they can be flexible. Terri Williams, County Health Department, stated that although some of these things do not directly relate to food, they indirectly do. She stated they are meeting with cities to talk about the deduction of points. Mayor Alexander asked if it is possible for a restaurant that does not have a big enough kitchen to get an Terri Williams, County Health Department, stated if a State code requirement is not met, a restaurant could get less than an "A." Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would support this if there could be a workshop to continue discussing how this works. Councilmember Williams stated when an action was previously not taken, it was interpreted that Rancho Cucamonga did not want their restaurants inspected. She stated that was a misconception. She stated at no time were Rancho Cucamonga restaurants not inspected. She felt the Ordinance should be adopted. She felt the restaurant owners would love to tell some of their experiences with some of the County Health Inspectors. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 739. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 11 ORDINANCE NO. 739 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ORDINANCE NO. 3930 RELATING TO INSPECTION GRADING OF FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS AND AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 739. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. II ~. PUBLIC HEARINGS I Gl. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE A staff report was presented by Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director. Councilmember Michael asked if the people serving the alcohol would be required to have training. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated yes. Mayor Alexander asked if a group of $0 people would have to choose from the pre-approved list of caterers. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated yes. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Lynn Christie stated she cares about this because it affects all of the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. She brought up the requirements for being allowed to have alcohol at a facility. She did not feel it should be up to the City Council to say if someone wants to have a toast or not based on their personal beliefs. She did not think people should have to choose from an approved list of caters and that people should have more flexibility. Jin Nee Klm stated she does not feel alcohol should be allowed in Central Park and did not feel this window should be opened. She stated everyone is looking forward to Central Park and felt a standard should be set and not allow alcohol so that values are not compromised. She felt there should be no tolerance of alcohol. She stated this would set a standard for other cities as well. She did not feel alcohol should have to be used in order for people to have fun. Michelle McNeill felt a place like a church, the YMCA or Sweeten Hall is more of a private place where people can have alcohol if they want it, but did not feel it should be allowed at Central Park. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 12 Janet Ryerson of the Rancho Cucamonga Sr. Advisory Committee, stated she is a strong proponent of allowing alcohol. She felt the $40,000 this can generate is important and should not be overlooked. She stated Central Park facilities would offer a lower cost venue for events rather than a place like Etiwanda Gardens. She stated the City has lost bookings at City facilities because alcohol was not allowed. She felt this was a good idea for the City and that it will generate revenue. Caryn Payzant stated she appreciates this is a sensitive issue. She stated in her business she listens to families and parents. She stated she is hearing this facility is close to neighborhoods, which could be affected by parties at Central Park. She felt there were other creative ways to generate revenue in the City. She felt if this were approved, the City Council would be compromising themselves. She felt the City standards would be lowered if alcohol were allowed to come in. Verna DiCortio stated she is excited about the Sr. Center at Central Park. Elizabeth Mariscal stated that Central Park is an affordable place for people to have receptions. She felt as long as there is security that alcohol should be allowed. She asked if more hours could be allowed for a party instead of limiting it to four hours. She felt the alcohol should be allowed. Betty Linker of the Sr. Advisory Committee, stated based on the regulations and restrictions set, this should be allowed. She stated people will drink no matter what the regulations are if they want to. She stated this would be restrictive and an approved atmosphere. Alvin Sharp felt alcohol should be allowed at Central Park and that he plans to have an anniversary reception at Central Park and would appreciate being able to have a champagne toast. He stated that if people want to drink, they will do it no matter what, but if it is supervised it will be a much better situation. Leslie Grimes encouraged people to come to the City Council meetings and get involved. She did not understand what food has to do with the serving of alcohol and why people would have to use a caterer for their food if they want to serve alcohol. She suggested a bar tending service be required instead. She felt limiting this to beer, wine and champagne was a good idea. She felt Rancho Cucamonga should look at what Claremont and other cities do before setting these policies. She felt it is penalizing people to have to use a caterer if they are serving alcohol. Wilma Steeve of the Sr. Advisory Committee and President of the VIP Club, felt it was ridiculous if alcohol cannot be served. She felt the revenue was needed to run the facility and felt this should be approved. Bill McCliman did not feel the caterer should be part of the requirements. He felt the City Council should listen to the seniors. He stated he did not feel people should be charged to cater a wedding. Councilmember Williams pointed out that currently alcohol is not allowed at the parks, and that this would be changing the rule to allow it. A man, who did not identify himself, stated he operates an offsite catering company. He mentioned how well run the community centers are at Cerritos and Yorba Linda. He stated Claremont is also run very well. He stated there is a very Iow rate of problems at these facilities. He stated he would love to operate at Central Park. He added he did not feel the policy is stating you have to have your food catered if you are going to have alcohol, but that if you have alcohol there should be professional people to serve it, and that you can bring in your own food in. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, stated if someone wants to serve alcohol, they would have to have a caterer serve the food and the alcohol. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 13 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this could be changed if the Council directed staff to do this. Councilmember Williams felt it was the intent to have a licensed bar tending service if they are going to serve alcohol because she did not feel City staff should have to sorry about any problems that might occur, and felt a professional should have to do this. She did not feel a caterer should be required for food if alcohol is served. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is voting "NO" on the Ordinance based on his conscience. He stated he did quite a bit of walking in the surrounding neighborhoods and that it was 2 to 1 of people not in favor of alcohol being served. He stated there are a lot of children in the neighborhoods and a lot of traffic. He felt the City can do fine without the alcohol and would be able to serve the people without it. Councilmember Michael stated he raised the issue about a caterer being required if serving alcohol. He stated he did not mean a caterer for food, but for the serving of the alcohol. He stated he is willing to make the modification about the catering issue that it only be required for the serving of alcohol so that people can bring in their own food. Councilmember Williams felt the title of the Ordinance is misleading. She stated this Ordinance is very similar to the regulations at the stadium. She stated this is just to allow alcohol within the building proper. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he has toured the facility and that the rooms that would allow alcohol are separate from other parts of the center. He felt this would be a great facility for a reception. Mayor Alexander felt the pre-approved catering list is a good thing. He felt the City will do everything they can to control the serving of alcohol. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 741. ORDINANCE NO. 741 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVISING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO POSSESSION AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN CITY PARKS, AND AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 741 for the April 20, 2005 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 4-1 (Gutierrez voted no). II H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS ~ I H1. UPDATE REGARDING 210 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING A staff report was presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he put this on the agenda and was glad to hear Caltrans is doing something. He feels it has been too long to get them doing something. ACTION: Report received and filed. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 14 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Michael stated not too long ago Supervisor Biane talked about programs he has done to help the City and felt them should be a reception and Proclamation presented to him for his efforts. Councilmember Williams stated as the Senior Center comes on line, all the efforts and programming should be tracked to find out what it is really costing us to provide services there. She felt the Moms will be disappointed there will be no tot lot at Central Park and felt this should be a priority. She stated this Friday is opening night for the Quakes and looks forward to a great season. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he looks forward to the Mayor throwing out the first pitch at the Quakes game. He stated he does canvas neighborhoods about many issues. He stated he is proud to be on the City Council and likes finding solutions to problems. He stated he loves this City and wants to make this a great place for everyone. Councilmember Spagnolo commented on the ceremony recently held for Deputy Ron Ives. He commented on the evaluation of the animal shelter and asked for public participation. Mayor Alexander mentioned all the people he talks to per day and that the community is good. 12. APPROVAL OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING THE SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES BY FACILITY RENTAL GROUPS IN THE SENIOR AND COMMUNITY CENTER AT CENTRAL PARK SEE DISCUSSION UNDER ITEM Gl. Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, clarified that it would be Council's direction to approve the policy with the appropriate changes to items 14 and 15, which would still require a preapproved bartending service, subject to these same conditions, but remove all references to the serving of food. The Council concurred with Mr. McArdle's clarification to the approval of this item. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Alexander to approve the policy as modified above. Motion carried 4-1 (Gutierrez ¥oted no). 13. FOLLOW-UP ON CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON MICROCHIPPING SERVICES AND ENHANCED VETERINARY CARE AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL SHELTER (Oral report from Dan Avera, Deputy Director of Public Health, County of San Bernardino). A staff report was presented by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst Ill. She introduced Dan Avera from the County. Mr. Avera presented information about the animal control system. He stated they would like to start this program and that it is about $5.00 for the chip itself. He stated they are estimating the cost to the pet owner to be approximately $15.00. He stated some veterinarians also provide this service. He stated it is recommended to chip all adopted pets and to chip other animals on certain days. He stated if the City wants a mandatory program they would need to discuss this with the City Attorney. He stated he would like to recommend that the County Veterinarian tour the facility and look at the health of the animals at the shelter. He could direct staff what treatment to give to the animals after evaluating them. He felt there will be an increased need for veterinary care. He talked about giving vaccinations to the animals while they are in the kennel. He stated he wou]d like to recommend that the County Veterinarian come to the shelter two days per week, not to exceed 8 hours per week, to make any recommendations about the care of the animals. He stated it is also a possibility to go out for an RFP to get vet care. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 15 Councilmember Michael stated he supports the City making improvements to the shelter. He felt the people answering the phone should have a good attitude and good customer service. Mr. Avera stated they would work on this. Mayor Alexander asked about the cost of the eight hours per week of vet care. Mr. Avera stated the estimated cost is $100 per hour. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Nicole Myerchin stated she has been asking for chipping and vet care for two years and felt the cost is ridiculous. She referred to the efficiency of Upland's shelter. She felt this program would be a cash cow for the County. She commented on a letter sent to the City Manager's office in 2004 from a veterinarian that offered his service for $50 per hour. She continued to talk about the services this would include. She stated she would like to see the County's contract. She felt a position could be eliminated at the shelter in order to afford the vet care. Councilmember Michael asked if she has met with the City Manager's staff to discuss this. Ms. Myerchin stated yes she has. Susan Grail and Kelly Heillig talked about the Cats In Need Program and the service at the shelter. They felt the staff is very rude at the shelter. They stated they need more fosters for the animals. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if they can direct staff to look into the trap, neuter and release program. Pamela Hall stated it is good to see the City so concerned about so many things in the City and felt they should also be concerned about the animals in the City. She felt vet care should be full time. She felt Nathan Winograd should do an evaluation of this. She felt the City should run its own shelter. Mayor Alexander stated he is not excited about the County's proposal and would like to check into other offers for vet service. He did not know why we haven't done anything about the offer Nicole Myerchin mentioned. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst Ill, stated Ms. Myerchin had forwarded to her an offer from a local vet, which she remembers the letter indicating $80,000 per year. She stated the City would have to renovate the facility to provide medical facilities for the animals. Mayor Alexander stated he would be interested in the City pursuing an RFP. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff needs to know what level of service the Council wants so an RFP can be written. Mayor Alexander suggested the Council meet to further discuss this. Councilmember Spagnolo suggested staff look at the level of care that is needed. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, stated the next meeting to discuss the animal shelter is April 26 and this could be discussed then. Mayor Alexander felt this was too long to wait. Councilmember Michael stated he feels uncomfortable spending money without knowing all the areas that need money. He asked where the money would come from for this. City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 16 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it would come out of fund balance, and continued talking about budget issues facing the City. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Michael to go forward with the microchipping, including the 5,000 chips to be donated, and to receive the information for veterinarian services as soon as possible. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff can craft an RFP for various levels of vet service so the Council can have choices and see what the cost will be. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst Ill, stated there is a resident that would offer 1,000 chips and then have the County staff trained by AVID so they can put them in. Nicole Myerchin stated the training and the scanners by AVID is for flee. She stated it is 1,000 microchips valued at $5,000 and that they are inserted at other shelters by the staff for free. She felt the City would be unwisely spending money for what they are asking for per animal. Councilmember Michael asked if the City receives the 1,000 chips and training for free, would the County charge for the service even though the chips are free. Dan Avera, County, stated they would not charge, but added the one thing that was not discussed was the registration cost. He stated implanting the chip without registering it does not do any good. He stated they would implant it for free if there is not any additional cost. He stated the County will not make any money from microchipping animals. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 14. CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL BY NATHAN WINOGRAD OF "NO-KILL SOLUTIONS" TO PROVIDE CONSULTATION SERVICES TO THE CITY REGARDING THE FEASIBILITY OF THF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ANIMAL SHELTER BECOMING A NO-KILL SHELTER A staff report was presented by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III. Councilmember Michael asked about the deficit in the operations of the Tompkins County shelter. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, stated since there is no sample of work from Mr. Winograd since he is fairly new to the business. Staff saw the annual report for Tompkins County online, which there was a quote from Mr. Winograd expressing a quote of a budget deficit at Tompkins SPCA for last year. She stated she has talked to one of the Boardmembers at Tompkins SPCA about this. She stated Mr. Winograd explained the budget deficit is because of adding the additional shelter, requiring more services, and stated the new director there, that replaced him on an interim basis, has hired additional staff, increased service hours, and gave himself a raise for the Director's salary, etc. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo to approve the proposal by Nathan Winograd. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 15. DISCUSSION OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION (Oral) Councilmember Spagnolo stated he had previously requested a Blue Ribbon or Public Safety Commission be created. He stated he would like to make a recommendation or a motion that they look at the feasibility to establish a Public Safety Commission to look at the needs of the community. Due to the late hour, Mayor Alexander suggested this be done at the April 26th meeting or sooner. ACTION: The Council concurred to discuss this at an upcoming meeting. 16. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) City Council Minutes April 6, 2005 Page 17 Councilmember Williams stated she has encouraged people to write to their legislators about issues affecting our City, especially the CDBG Program. She stated Congressman Dreier had voted to support the City's keeping CDBG funds and took everyone very seriously. She thanked him for his support. She stated $955,000 was awarded to Rancho Cucamonga for the electric bike trail by SANBAG. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 11:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk April 20, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES [1 A. CALL TO ORDER [ The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, April 20, 2005, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; and James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer. [[ B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) Mayor Alexander announced the closed session item. B1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; O & S HOLDINGS, LLC; JOE O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER, AND LINDA DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY; REGARDING SALE OF PROPERTY - CITY B2. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CITY MANAGER PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957. (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 6, 2005) II C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I No communication was made on the closed session item. II D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION The closed session began at 5:35 p.m II E. CiTY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS City Council Minutes April 20, 2005 Page 2 The closed session recessed at 6:40 p.m. with no action taken. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re~lular Meetinq [[ A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, April 20, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 7:39 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Michael Nelson, Sr. RDA Analyst; Larry Temple, Administrative Director; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Lorraine Phong; Information Systems Analyst; Shelly Munson, Information Systems Specialist; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Bob Zetterberg, Waste Management Coordinator; Brad Duller, City Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst Ill; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kathryn L. Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Shirr'l Griffin, Office Specialist II. Il ~. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I B1. Announcement by the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's Team in Training Program. Mel Hill, Coach for Team in Training, stated that "Team in Training" is the fundraising arm of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society and is the largest endurance training program in the World. He sa!d the purpose is to find a cure for leukemia and lymphoma and other blood-related diseases, as leukemia is the largest killer of any childhood disease in children of ages 1 to 14. He announced that they are forming the Fall group, which means they will be training for the Long Beach Half Marathon, the San Francisco NIKE Marathon and the Maul Marathon. He left information on the "Team in Training" meeting times for fall training sessions. Mayor Alexander presented a Proclamation to Mel Hill, on behalf of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. B2. Presentation of California Society of Municipal Finance Officer's (CSMFO's) Certificate of Award for Excellence for Outstanding Financial Reporting for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2004. City Council Minutes April20,2005 Page 3 Laura Nomura, Chair for the Inland Chapter of the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers presented the Award to the Mayor and Members of the City Council for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. She stated that the Certificate of Award for Outstanding Financial Reporting is issued in recognition of meeting professional standards and criteria in financial reporting, which reflect a high level of quality in the annual financial statements and underlying accounting system from which the reports were prepared. She said Rancho Cucamonga is one of 161 cities out of the 478 total cities in California to be awarded this honor; and it is the 15t' time the City has been awarded the Certificate for Outstanding Financial Reporting. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 25 - May 1 as "West Nile Virus and Mosquito and Vector Control Awareness Week." Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Dr. Min-Lee Cheng, District Manager, West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District. Dr. Min-Lee Cheng, discussed the importance of educating and increasing the public's awareness of the threat of the West Nile Virus and related diseases. B4. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring April 3 - 9 as "National Architecture Week." Mayor Alexander presented the Proclamation to Herta Gaus, President of American Institute of Architects, Inland Empire Chapter. Herta Gaus stated the American Institute of Architects, Inland Empire Chapter, wanted the public to be aware that they are a resource and the licensed architects are happy to volunteer as a sounding board or to provide input on issues. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS C1. Steve Marston regarding group homes in the Sapphire/Hillside area; he asked for the City Council to help. He commented that there is also a child molester in the neighborhood. He said OPARC vans are always in and out of the neighborhood and the high-speed traffic in the neighborhood is a problem. He submitted a petition to stop new group home at 5641 Carol. He said his neighborhood is ruined; he asked if anybody had any information that could help him. Councilmember Michael asked Police Chief Ortiz if he could make contact with OPARC to discuss the issues of their van drivers speeding in the neighborhood. C2. Klm Felten re concerns with four homes being built on the west side of Klusman Avenue, north of Diamond Avenue. She said in November 2003 they lost an appeal of four homes being built on a very small lot on Diamond Avenue and Klusman. She said the project was approved subject to no windows on the 2® story in the back of the houses and enhanced landscaping. She wants to know why these things are not being done as approved. Councilmember Gutierrez said we do need to set this straight for these people. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated staff met with the neighbors. He said the photo that was passed around was an older photo and the condition that was placed on the project was that there would be either no windows on non-view windows or architectural changes made to the rear elevations of those buildings. He said those window spaces that are shown in the photo are non-view glass windows. He said there is no ability for those homeowners in the new homes to look out their windows into their backyards or into the backyards of others. Ms. Felten said when you open the windows, you can look into the yards. City Council Minutes April 20, 2005 Page 4 Mr. Buller stated in reviewing the architectural changes to the backs of these homes, the only operable windows are windows that have a sill height of 5'7" from inside the room and they are only 2' x 2' square windows. Mr. Buller said it is an issue where we as City staff believe that the developer is in line with the conditions of approval and is moving forward with the project, and there is definitely a disagreement in that decision. Another neighbor stated that the final resolution states that there would be no windows in the back of the home; she said they were never told about obscured windows. She said they are just trying to get what they were told. Mayor Alexander stated that City Council approved the houses but didn't specifically set the condition on the windows. He said he attempted at least ten times to review the audiotape, but it was not audible. It was agreed that this item would be agendized for the next City Council meeting. C3. Sherrill lchiho (same as C2 above). C4. John Lyons regarding group homes and the price of gasoline; should look at helping senior citizens or people in need due to the gas crisis. C5. George Rushe re invitation to Council to the Rancho Cucamonga Bachelor & Bacheloretts Square & Round Dance Club 34th Anniversary Dance on May 13th at the R.C. Senior Center. C6. Bill McCliman regarding the position of City Manager, City Council maintaining control, Safety Blue Ribbon Commission and Fire Resolution FD 05-021 approved this date. C7. Kevin Hoyt regarding comments to the City Manager as it relates to Resolution FD 05-021. C8. Lorena Corona re Cinco de Mayo Celebration 5/5/05 @ Chaffey College. C9. Melanie Ingrain re emergency response times and a request that the special meeting re Public Safety Commission be rescheduled to an evening meeting. C10. Nicole Myerchin re City population signage; contract for animal control; microchipping and Council maintaining control. It D. CONSENT CALENDAR I Jack Lam, City Manager, stated item 11 to be removed from the agenda and would come back at a later date. City Council Minutes April20,2005 Page 5 D1. Approval of Warrants, Register 3/30/05 through 4/12/05 and Payroll ending 4/6/05, for the total amount of $3,063,119.08. D2. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 2005. D3. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel 12 Kv Electrical Distribution and Onsite System Cabling, Connection, Equipment Project, to be funded from Accts. 17053035650/1485705 and 17053035650/1487705 (Municipal Utility). RESOLUTION NO. 05-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES AND VICTORIA GARDENS SOUTHERN PARCEL 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ONSITE SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, EQUIPMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Chaffey-lsle House Remodel and Garage/Apartment Construction in said city and authorizing and directing the City Clerk to advertise to receive bids. RESOLUTION NO. 05-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CHAFFEY-ISLE HOUSE REMODEL AND GARAGE/APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION" iN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Citywide Street Name Sign Replacement, Phase 3, to be funded from Acct. No. 1025001-5300, as approved in the FY 04-05 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 05-138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CITYWIDE STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT, PHASE 3, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval of the plans and specifications for the Fuel Tank Retrofit with Aboveground Fuel Tanks for the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex, to be funded from City Fund 25 Capital Reserves. D7. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Grove Avenue Street Improvements from 8th Street to Arrow Route, to be funded from Acct. Nos. 11803035650/1472180-0 and 12083035650/1472208-0. RESOLUTION NO. 05-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "THE GROVE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM 8TM STREET TO ARROW ROUTE" IN SAID CiTY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS City Council Minutes April 20, 2005 Page 6 DS. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice inviting Bids" for the Renovation of Two Baseball Fields at Red Hill Community Park, to be funded from Park Development funds, Acct. No. 11203055650/1222120-0, as approved in the FY 2004/05 budget. RESOLUTION NO. 05-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RENOVATION OF TVVO BASEBALL FIELDS AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PAR}(" AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D9. Approval of the Parks, Recreation Facilities and Community Services Update. D10. Approval for the purchase of one (1) new John Deere 4720 compact utility tractor from Powerland Equipment in the amount of $26,852.18, to be funded from Acct. No. 1712001-5603. Dll. Approval to purchase HP Design Jet 5550ps 60-Inch Plotter and IBM p520 2-Way 1.65 GHz SMP Server in the total amount of $49,000.00, and authorization to appropriate $49,000.00 from the Computer Equipment Replacement fund into Acct. No. 1714001-5605. REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA D12. Approval to appropriate $11,240.00 from the 2003 California Law Enforcement Equipment Program (CLEEP) Grant Award fund balance into Acct. No. 1366702-5603, and $50,760.00 from the Fiscal Year 2003/04 United States Department of Justice Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Award fund balance into Acct. No. 1368701-5603 for the purchase of two (2) high speed digital license plate reading cameras and three (3) audio-video recording devices for the Police Station interview rooms. D13. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for 5844 East Avenue, located south of Wilson Avenue, submitted by Joseph W. Bonneville. RESOLUTION NO. 05-141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR 5844 EAST AVENUE D14. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 16567, located between Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and between Hellman and Malachite Avenues, submitted by Laing Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 05-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 16567 RESOLUTION NO. 05-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16567 D15. Approval of Map, Interim Basin Maintenance Agreement (CO 05-030), Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 and Street City Council Minutes April20,2005 Page 7 Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract 15982-1, located at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles. RESOLUTION NO. 05-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 15982-1, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND INTERIM BASIN MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION NO. 05-145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 15982-1 D16. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $1,063,948.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, C.P. Construction Co., Inc. (CO 05-031), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $106,394.80 for the Base Line Road Storm Drain Improvements and Pavement Rehabilitation from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from Drainage funds, Acct. No. 11123035650/1465112-0, Measure "1" Funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1465176-0, AD 86-2 PJC Drainage District funds, Acct. No. 16063035650/1465606-0, and appropriate an additional amount of $260,000.00 from Measure "1" fund balance to Acct. No. 11763035650/1465176-0. D17. Approval of Professional Services Agreement with No Kill Solutions (CO 05-032) for Animal Shelter Consultation Services in the amount of $14,000, and appropriate $14,000 to Acct. No. 10011045300. D18. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $138,188.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Silvia Construction, Inc. (CO 05-033), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $13,818.80 for the Sapphire Street Pavement Rehabilitation from 19th Street to Banyan Street, to be funded from Measure "1" funds, Acct. No. 11763035650/1471176-0. D19. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit, accept a Maintenance Letter of Credit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2002-00601, located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue, approximately 600 feet south of Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Sommerville-Conzelman Company. RESOLUTION NO. 05-146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2002-00601 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D20. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2003-00319, located at the cul-de-sac terminus of Birdsong Place, west of Hermosa Avenue and south of Almond Street, submitted by Hardwood Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 05-147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2003-00319 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes April 20, 2005 Page 8 D21. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond for Improvements for TR12659-4, located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), submitted by Centex Homes. D22. Approval to accept the Electrical Distribution System Conduit and Substructure Project, Contract No. 03-103, as complete, retain the Faithful Performance Bond as a Guarantee Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $528,852.09. RESOLUTION NO. 05-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM CONDUIT AND SUBSTRUCTURE PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 03-103 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D23. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond, No. 08655345, in the amount of $75,865.00 for the Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation from Alta Loma Drive to Lemon Avenue, Contract No. 03- 131. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Michael to approve the consent calendar except for item Dll. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Il E. CONSENT ORDINANCES II No Items Submitted. II F, ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS II Fl. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND ANNUAL ACTION PLAN - A review of the Federally-required 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan and 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan, which includes the preliminary selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,134,608. Staff report presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. Councilmember Williams stated that this is a tough job and that putting all this information together and the research involved is phenomenal. She said this year Congress nearly wiped out CDBG, but it was reinstated. She said because of this, she is afraid of what might happen in the future. She said she hopes that the organizations and those who are assisted through the funding need to keep that information stream going; she said to continue to write to the Congressperson. Councilmember Michael asked for an explanation for the public regarding the new public service activity being recommended for funding which is the Fire Department's request to provide automatic defibrillators in various locations. Tom Grahn stated each defibrillator costs approximately $3,000.00, which would allow us to provide up to five defibrillators this year. It is proposed that they would be located at different senior-type facilities, City Council Minutes April20,2005 Page 9 including senior housing facilities, throughout the City, as seniors qualify for funding and suppod through the Block Grant program. Councilmember Michael commended staff on the hard work involved to put the Plan together and on the excellent report. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Olen Jones, HOPE through Housing Foundation, stated they are very pleased to be one of the recommended Grant recipients and appreciate the City's support. He thanked the City and said the City is their oldest and best community partner and the support means a lot to them. Jess Torres, Inland Fair Housing Mediation Board, stated they have been privileged to provide fair housing and landlord/tenant services for Rancho for many years. They, too, have the same concerns regarding CDBG and they take every opportunity to voice their opposition to the cutting of those funds and try to raise their voice so that the Federal Government does hear what the needs are. They thanked the City for the support in the past and said they look forward to serving the City in the future. Sandra Rutherford, Executive Director, Camp Fire USA, Mt. San Antonio Council, thanked the City the years of continued support, as the program really means a lot to the residents. She said they fill up immediately when they do the resident-camp program for the Iow-income children; they are also the providers of the after-school programming for the HOPE through Housing Foundation; and they have a club program at Stork Elementary School. She is trying to move headquarters into Rancho Cucamonga. Wytske Visser, Executive Director, Inland Valley Council of Churches, thanked the City for their support. She said they served approximately 1,000 people last year from this City through either emergency food, shelter and mortgage assistance. They appreciate being one of the proposed Grant recipients. Julie Boynton, Executive Director, Project Sister Sexual Assault Crisis and Prevention Services, said they are requesting CDBG funds this year for three of their programs: Counseling, Teen Prevention and Community Education. She described the significance of the three programs and thanked the City for their continued support of the programs and services. Project Sister Programs and Services value their partnership with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Greg Alvarado, OIdtimers Foundation, thanked the City and Council for past support in assisting with funding for the nutrition and minor home repair program for seniors. They look forward to a long partnership with the City and they are very excited about the new senior center and look forward to working with staff to develop services for seniors. Diana Lee, Rancho Cucamonga YMCA, acknowledged that the YMCA has been almost life-long partners with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. She thanked the City for their continued support of their teen center in North town and the Senior Transportation Program. She said they have a lot of challenges facing them with respect to budget cuts and potential federal fund cuts. They are looking forward to the grand opening of Central Park, and they are ready, willing and able to spend more time on senior transportation. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to direct staff to proceed with final reports and bring back for adoption. City Council Minutes April 20, 2005 Page 10 ]I G. PUBLIC HEARINGS ] Gl. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION IN EMINENT DOMAIN OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD ACROSS A PORTION OF APN 1100-011-02 (CONTINUED FROM MARCH 16, 2005) Staff report presented by Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Jary Cockroft, KB Homes, stated he represents the developer of the property adjacent to the right of way. He said they worked closely with City staff to try and resolve this issue and will continue to do so. He said he would answer any question that the Council might have. Mayor Alexander thanked Mr. Cockroft for his support and for being present at this meeting. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 05-094 A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO AND WIDENING OF BASE LINE ROAD (PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1100- 011-02) MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 05-094. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. II H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I H1. UPDATE ON CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'S AB 939/AB 1066 EFFORTS AND FUTURE PROGRAMS, MULTI-FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAM AND EARTH DAY CELEBRATION (Oral) Staff Report presented by Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, along with a power point presentation and update on AB 939. Councilmember Michael asked if he is working with businesses. Mr. Zetterberg said that they have been doing free audits, looking at the businesses and finding out what they have, looking at the containers, offering to have recycling containers replacing the trash; he said they are looking at businesses that do not have a lot of restaurant/food waste and also encouraging business/complexes to have their gardeners take their green waste and not put it in the dumpster; the select loads are basically loads that are dry, that have just paper cardboard; he said contractual staff has been doing this for the last year and a half. Mr. Zetterberg stated he was very happy that City Council is supportive of the efforts of staff; he said there are a lot of issues to work out with the State in terms of how they calculate this diversion. He said he has been to numerous meetings discussing this. City Council Minutes April20,2005 Page 11 Councilmember Michael asked what would happen if the State did not give an extension to any city. Mr. Zetterberg said the State would first put the City on a program where they would come in and evaluate what you are doing, and then would advise what needs to be done. Mr. Zetterberg said we have 37 different programs that were to be implemented, and of those, only one was not implemented, and that was to have neighborhood trash cops, where people would be going through your recycled bin. That was the first thing he asked to be removed. He said the State has not taken into consideration the City's massive growth. He said he would be presenting this to the Board on May 2® in Sacramento. ACTION: Report received and filed. H2. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING ALL FiRE STATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS SAFE SURRENDER SITES FOR NEWBORNS Staff report presented by Fire Chief Peter Bryan, along with a power point presentation that reviewed some of the provisions of the Sate Law and what we do with the Safe Haven Law. Chief Bryan stated we are one of many agencies that have joined with the County of San Bernardino in implementing this program with Council's approval. The San Bernardino County Fire Chiefs, along with the San Bemardino County Emergency Medical Services Association and its Officers, have developed a program in conjunction with the Sate Law which will allow fire stations and designated facilities within the County of San Bemardino to receive newborns and provide immunity to the person who is surrendering the newborn as well as the agency. It is called the California Safe Haven Law. Senator Jim Brulte introduced the Safe Surrender Baby Law, Senate Bill 1368; Governor Davis signed it into law in September 2000; and it went into effect January 1, 2001. Recently, Senate Bill 116, introduced by Senator Dutton, will make permanent a law which will allow mothers to safely surrender their children within 72 hours of its birth, and that has unanimously passed the State Senate. Mayor Alexander stated his only concern is that we don't go so far as to discourage people to use this by the bureaucracy we put in place. Chief Bryan said the regarding the immunity and liability issue, we are very encouraged by Senator Dutton~s action to get this passed through the Senate to make it permanent, and we're encouraged that the Governor will sign it also. Ne said staff recommends adopting the Resolution. Councilmember Spagnolo stated that he personally was involved in a call where a four-hour old child was taken from a mother who did not want it. It was in the Sunrise parking lot, which was a good choice. He said this is a long time coming. Councilmember Michael stated it's a program that will be of value for the future, but he hopes we never have to use again. Councilmember Williams asked if the County has a plan to promote education so it reaches the individuals who need to know about it. Fire Chief Bryan stated that the County and other organizations want to continue the public education and periodically publish the sticker so people understand what the sticker is all about, what the location designation is, and that there is that service out there. There is now a service that can be had in every community at every fire station that is staffed on a regular basis. RESOLUTION NO. 05-149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING PARTICIPATING FIRE STATIONS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AS "SAFE HAVENS" FOR THE SURRENDER OF NEWBORNS MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 05-149. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes April 20, 2005 Page 12 H3. APPROVAL TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,810,793.70 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. (CO 05-034), AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $681,079.37 FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE STREET WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO NORTH OF 19TM STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, ACCT. NO. 11243035650/1406124-0 AND BEAUTIFICATION FUNDSI ACCT. NO. 11103165650/1464110-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $1,100,000.00 TO ACCT. NO. 11243035650/1406124-0 FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND BALANCE Staff report presented by Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer. Councilmember Gutierrez stated that this is going to cover that big cement drainage ditch on the side of Haven southbound, south of Lemon, and will be widened to three lanes. He said this is really needed, and he is very excited about the project. Councilmember Gutierrez asked about the status of a bus stop south of the freeway. Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer, stated any existing bus stops will have bus bays (turn outs). They will not be installing any shelters. Councilmember Gutierrez asked who pays for the covered bus stops. Dan James, stated there may be a few that the City operates and maintains, but the majority of them are by shopping centers in an industrial area, where the City required the developer to install them; the developer actually installs them on their own property, and it is their responsibility for maintenance. Councilmember Gutierrez said now that the freeway is there, he doesn't know if the stop he was thinking about is ustified. He said it's a tough area to get off a bus as you're going southbound just past the freeway (around 19 h Street). Dan James stated if there is a bus stop there now and if the transportation company is still utilizing it, the City has designed for the installation of a bus bay. Councilmember Gutierrez said he would like to take a look at it; he said maybe Omnitrans could come in and offer some help. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff could also check with the transportation agency to see if there is any flexibility in the movement of that exact spot. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo to approve staff's recommendation and bring the Ordinance back at a future meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ]1 1. COUNCIL BUSINESS ] COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Spagnolo stated that he understands a lot of the concerns regarding the group home issue. He has a concern with respect to public safety (multiple residents living in one home). He asked City Council Minutes April 20, 2005 Page 13 the City Attorney if there's a way to know ahead of time when those type of facilities are coming in, i.e., permits, fire regulations, etc. Jim Markman, City Attorney, said the approach would be to go to the State Licensing Agency and see if they would accommodate with information regarding the issuance of those licenses so that safety personnel would know that there is a different kind of occupancy other than a single family residence. Councilmember Michael said he believes the Fire Department here must do an inspection before that type of home is licensed by the State. Brad Duller, City Planner, said as far as he understands, they simply have to go through the normal course of Building & Safety plan check. Fire Chief Bryan stated that the State Building Code has implemented a specific occupancy type just for these home based care facilities. He said there are two different classifications, 0-6 occupants and then it's greater than 6, with different requirements from the State Building Code. He said they are inspected when the Fire Department receives notice from the Department of Social Services. Councilmember Michael said if we could get that info through Building & Safety, the Fire Department or the State, then we could put it on the run cards. Fire Chief Bryan said in some communities they have coordinated that information with Planning and Building Departments. He said it is not intended to be an enforcement of some zoning practices but there have been issues where Fire has been able to work with other departments and community efforts to make sure that it does meet all the requirements. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like the group homes issue on the agenda for discussion. He said he would also like to explore in the near future the issue of families getting together and buying a nice, expensive home. He said we need to look at our codes and determine whether or not we want to enforce that. He said the Diamond/Klusman issue also needs to be on the agenda. He said he would like to address the synchronization of signals to make sure that traffic is flowing as good as it can. He said in regards to the freeway landscaping, we need to address CalTrans to find out their intent regarding the planting of trees between Milliken and Rochester. He stated with respect to response time, people have the impression that the response time is suffering to the point ef 13.5 minutes, and he wants to know where and how much that is happening. He said he regrets that people can throw this information out to us, and we don't take the mechanism to respond to them and we limit ourselves to three minutes at the end of the meeting. He said we represent about 160,000 people, and we don't need to compete and say the public gets five minutes and we should get three minutes. He said that doesn't make sense, and we should use the time closer to the beginning of the meeting instead of the end. He said lack of staffing is causing concern, as over the last several years developers have gotten away with some things, or have cut corners; we have not had adequate oversight. He thinks the lack of staffing levels have affected the ability for the City to maintain a high quality of life in many developments in the City. He said we hire the City Manager and he runs the daily operations of the City, as that is the way the City is structured; he listens to us, and we'll take care of the business of the city with him and over him, although he does give us a lot of advice. He said we are over the City, we are elected officials. He said he feels on the monitor or on the screen at home on Channel 3, we need to post the graffiti hotline more often and regularly. Councilmember Michael said he wanted to thank staff in each department for doing an incredible job. He said we are blessed to have such wonderful things going on in this City, and we need te be very proud. Those issues that do need to be addressed need to be addressed in an effective, well-thought out manner and not overreact because of something that could become reactionary. He said this City Council adopts all employee bargaining agreements, and the City Manager is responsible to execute the provisions of those agreements and he also represents and presents a budget that we (Council) adopt. He said in ne way have we deferred any of eur responsibilities as a City Council te our City Manager; he is the Personnel Director for the City and he is the Personnel Director for the Fire Department. He said this Council does not want to be involved in disciplinary matters and turn it into a political issue versus an issue that the City Manager should deal with. City Council Minutes April 20, 2005 Page 14 Councilmember Williams said she concurs with everything that was said. She said the Cultural Center is going to contain our new library, the small theater and the celebration hall. She said along with that the Community Foundation and the Library Foundation have formed the PAL Campaign, promoting arts and literary, and to that end, there will be a winemaker's dinner on May 7, 2005, at Filippi Winery. She said it's a fundraiser for the new facility, with tickets selling at $100 a ticket. She said $70 of that $100 would be tax deductible. She said it's for a good cause; call the Library if there's any interest. Mayor Alexander stated to the Councilmembers that they have staff available to them between council meetings and would suggest they come in and find out what was said, listen to tapes, visuals, etc. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: ****** Kathryn L. Scott, CMC Deputy City Clerk April 26, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meetin~ A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Tuesday, April 26, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Williams J. Alexander called the meeting to order at 1:0'1 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams (arrived at 1:56 p.m.) and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Captain Pete Ortiz, Police Department; Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III; Kimbedy Thomas, Management Analyst III; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. I B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I No communication was made from the public. II c. oF mJSXN SS I C1. PRESENTATION BY TAIMIE BRYANT RE THE HAYDEN LAW Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, reported to the Council that Taimie Bryant, a law professor at UCLA Law School, has been involved in the writing of the Hayden Law and would be informing the Council about that. Taimie Bryant reported she started working on this project because of a request from Senator Tom Hayden. She informed the Council of the process they went through to study and develop this. Mayor Alexander felt animal shelter staff should be familiar with what is in the Hayden Law. Ms. Bryant agreed but stated this is very complex because there are many cross-references pertaining to this in order to get all of the information. She stated she is working to make this easier for people to find out about it. Mayor Alexander inquired what reasonable vet care was. Ms. Bryant stated reasonable is providing care to the animal so the owner can reclaim it. She felt the Hayden Law set the benchmark for the operation of animal shelters. Special City Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2005 Page 2 Councilmember Williams arrived at 1:56 p.m. Councilmember Gutierrez inquired about the care a vet would provide. Ms. Bryant felt there should be a job description in order to develop policies for the appropriate vet care. ACTION: Report received and filed. C2. DISCUSSION OF ANIMAL RELATED ISSUES - MICROCHIPPING AND VETERINARIAN SERVICE,C; A staff report was presented by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III on microchipping. Mayor Alexander opened the item for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: Nicole Myerchin commented on the microchipping in the City of Upland stating there is no registration fee. She felt $9.70 total would be more accurate cost for the microchipping of animals. She felt possibly charging non-residents $15.00 was another option to consider. She felt the AVID program was a good thing, but to give Rancho Cucamonga residents a break on the cost. She continued to comment on several incidents that have occurred at the animal shelter, which she did not feel should have happened with quarantined animals. Ms. Bryant felt there is a misunderstanding of what care for the animals means. Councilmember Michael felt some of the problems at the shelter have been because the contract is not clearly defined. He felt some of the problems Ms. Myerchin is pointing out should be talked about at another meeting. Ms. Bryant felt the question is what is reasonable care and felt possibly there is a question on the interpretation of the law. She felt the contract should identify what the care level should be. Mayor Alexander suggested these types of issues come back at a future meeting. Ms. Myerchin stated that was fine as long as this can be discussed further. Councilmember Spagnolo inquired of Ms. Myerchin if she has shared this information with the County. Ms. Myerchin stated she has and that she has also shared it with the City Manager's office. Ms. Bryant stated she is willing to help the City come up with a contract for animal services. Ms. Myerchin stated she appreciated the attendance of Ms. Bryant and would like to discuss some of the care issues at the shelter at a future meeting. John Lyons, Etiwanda, felt Ms. Bryant's presentation was excellent and stated he did not think Senator Tom Hayden was a hero. Dan Avera, County Public Health, stated the contract with the City was approved in 1995 and felt it should be looked at again. He stated he would like to know what the City Council's policies are. Councilmember Gutierrez asked if the County abides by the Hayden Law as part of their policy. Special City Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2005 Page 3 Mr. Avera stated it is state law and that whatever he would commit to would have to be approved by the Board of Supervisors. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, stated Upland has someone that donates the chips for the dogs and that is why their cost is less for Upland residents. She stated a Rancho Cucamonga resident that goes to Upland would have to pay $35.00, and that our City is only proposing $15.00. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to approve staff's recommendation to microchip cats and dogs and to allocate the funds from fund balance in the amount of $5,000 in order to match H©PE's share for the microchipping. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. A recess was taken at 3:05 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 3:18 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. A staff report was presented by Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III on veterinarian services. Councilmember Spagnolo felt we need to get into some level of vet care, but not until we know about the needs by studying this more. Councilmember Michael stated he agreed with Councilmember Spagnolo about getting into this gradually and would like to see what the County can offer for veterinarian services. Mayor Alexander stated he felt both the City and the County are responsible for the lack of veterinarian services. He felt the vet services should be enhanced to meet the standards of the Hayden Law at a minimum. He felt this should come back for further consideration. Councilmember Williams felt something creative should be done for veterinarian care for the present time. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: Nicole Myerchin stated she had Dr. Robert Mason come to the shelter and tour the facility. She felt a contract veterinarian should be hired. Councilmember Williams asked what the trap, neuter and return program was. Ms. Myerchin stated Tompkins County does not kill any animals. She stated what she suggests is that the animal is neutered and then returned to its owner instead of being killed. Councilmember Gutierrez asked when Nathan Wino§rad's study would be completed. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, stated it would start in June. Councilmem bet Michael felt the city should make inquiries of local vets and Cai Poly to see if there are people that can help in coordinating this with the County's contract. Councilmember Williams stated she agreed, but felt someone needed to be available to identify if an animal is sick on site. Mayor Alexander stated he would like to involve a local veterinarian in this. Special Ci~ Council Meeting Minutes April26,2005 Page 4 Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager, stated if the County provided vet services it would be part time only and not be available to make assessments when needed. Councilmember Gutierrez felt we should see how much money we have and then negotiate a contract. Councilmember Williams asked if we have talked to our local vets and see what quality care would be. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez for staff to work with Nicole Myerchin to establish a service level over the next four months to bring it back as soon as possible. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. C3. DISCUSSION OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION Councilmember Spagnolo stated most of our important work done in the City has been done through our Commissions, i.e., the Library Board, Park and Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission, including from the past, the Public Safety Commission. He stated he would like to see the Public Safety Commission re-established.because of the new challenges the City faces. He stated the 210 Freeway, the Mall and the growth in the community bring new challenges to the City. Mayor Alexander stated he knows the previous Public Safety Commission took a lot of staff time, but that public safety is a priority of the City. Councilmember Spagnolo stated the animal control issue is a public safety issue and could have been handled by the Public Safety Commission. Mayor Alexander stated he wanted to make sure the streets and roadways are maintained. He felt something in the form of a Public Safety commission is advisable and that it would not have to stay in existence forever. Councilmember Spagnolo agreed. Councilmember Williams asked what would the role be of the City Council. Councilmember Spagnolo stated the same as it as when the previous commission was in existence. Mayor Alexander stated the Public Safety Commission in the past did a lot of good towards things we are currently enjoying. He stated Clyde Boyd had some very good ideas in the past, even though at the time it was very controversial. Councilmember Spagnolo stated the reason the City formed the Public Safety Commission in the past was emergency response program, the Emergency Operations Center, and traffic issues. Councilmember Williams felt it was the City's responsibility to listen to the residents that have concerns. She felt town hall meetings should be held all over the City once a month where people can sit with the Council around a table to discuss their concerns. She stated she would like to be the one to meet with the people instead of passing this off to a commission. She felt it was her responsibility to the people to be involved in this. She felt town hall sessions would be a great way to meet constituents. Councilmember Gutierrez asked why the Public Safety Commission disbanded and felt it was Dennis Stout that disbanded it. Mayor Alexander stated it was Dennis Stout that started it and disbanded it. Special City Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2005 Page 5 Councilmember Gutierrez felt this commission would be very political and bold. He did not know how staff can handle another commission until it replenishes those that have been lost. He felt the town hall meetings would be very informative for the Council. He felt with all the issues involving public safety, these matters should be discussed with the whole Council. He stated he is concerned about the current fire department response time. Councilmember Michael stated he appreciates what Councilmember Spagnolo has asked for. He stated in May 1993 the City Council eliminated the Environmental Management and the Public Safety Commissions. He stated at that time, the Public Safety Commission was costing the City $340,000 to run it. He felt a lot of things were done because of the Public Safety Commission, but would have been done anyway even without it. He felt the money it cost to run the Public Safety Commission in the past could be better used now on actual services. He stated he had staff do a survey to see what cities have Public Safety Commissions, and that Hesperia is the only City that does. He felt the City Council has a responsibility for service levels, and that if there is a sensitive issue to be discussed that a task force be developed to work on it as was done for the Route 30 Freeway. He stated it was one of the goals of the City Council to do a comprehensive review of public safety. Mayor Alexander stated he questions the cost of $340,000 from the past to run the Public Safety Commission. He felt the Commission did a lot of good work. He did not feel the whole City Council should have to deal with all public safety issues and mentioned how hard it is to get everyone together. He stated he does not care what other cities do as far as public safety because he wants Rancho Cucamonga to be the safest City around. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: John Lyons stated he used to go to the Public Safety Commission meetings and felt they got a lot accomplished. He did not feel it was the same forum at the City Council meetings as was done at the Public Safety Commission meetings. He feltthe Public Safety Commission was very informative. He stated wages and benefits were never discussed. He felt limits could be put on staff time for the Public Safety Commission as far as when they meet and length of the meetings. Bill McCliman asked why it cost $340,000 !o run the Public Safety Commission. Councilmember Michael stated it was part of a staff report and the cost to run every commission in the City was included in that report. He stated this was staff time used which took away from other things. Mr. McCliman stated he did not feel it would cost the City any more money to run the Commission. He talked about the response times for the fire department. He stated crime is up. He felt there should be a commission to look at things properly. He stated just because there is a Public Safety Commission does not mean the City Council ignores their responsibility. He stated the Public Safety Commission could make recommendations to the full Council about various things. He stated he would like to see the Commission be comprised of five people. Nicole Myerchin stated felt the Public Safety Commission would be a group that would make suggestions to the City Council and that she supported this. Councilmember Gutierrez wanted to make sure the City discusses response times at the next meeting. He felt it would take longer to get to the bottom of the response time issue by running it through a Public Safety Commission. He felt the Council would come to a solution quicker. Councilmember Spagnolo felt it is good to look at other communities to see what works for them, but felt ultimately it is the responsibility of the Council to do what is the best thing for this community. Special City Council Meeting Minutes April 26, 2005 Page 15 MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Alexander to re-establish a Public Safety Commission for the purpose of addressing important safety issues facing our community, including but not limited to police and fire services, traffic safety and disaster preparedness. He stated the Commission would be comprised of seven members, all residents of Rancho Cucamonga. He stated one member would be professional police, one member would be professional fire, and one member with professional paramedic. He stated there would be four members from the general public, each member representing a quadrant of this community- one from the northwest, northeast, southwest and southeast. He stated all members would be serving two-year terms in accordance with our current practices for filling Commission seats. Councilmember Williams felt she would like to discuss these issues directly with the people. She stated she liked the idea of community meetings every month or every other month. She stated she cannot support this. Councilmember Michael stated we compare to other cities to compare benchmarks. He stated he felt the staff needs to focus putting personnel on the streets. He did not feel the Commission was critical at this time. Motion fails 2-3 (Gutierrez, Michael, Williams voted no). I D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 4:51 p.m. Respecffully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk May 4, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Re.qular Meetinq II A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, May 4, 2005, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor William J. Alexander reconvened the meeting to order at 7:22 p.m. Present were Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, L. Dennis Michael, Sam Spagnolo, Diane Williams and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Pamela Easter, Deputy City Manager; Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director; Lynda Thompson, Assistant RDA Analyst; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Lorraine Phong, Information Systems Analyst; Shelly Munson, Information Systems Specialist; Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Bullet, City Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Trang Huynh, Building Official; John Thomas, Plan Check Manager; Mark Salazar, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III; Captain Pete Ortiz, Rancho Cucamonga Police Depadment; Chief Peter Bryan, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Deputy Chief Mike Bell, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Kimberly Thomas, Management Analyst III; Kathy Scott, Deputy City Clerk; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. ]1 B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS [ B1. Presentation of Certificates to AYSO for winning the Girls' Sectional Championship and for placing 3r~ in the Tri-Section Finals. Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented certificates to the girls. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May 3-9, 2005, as "Hire A Veteran Week." Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented the Proclamation to Dr. James Willingham. Dr. Willingham talked about their program stating they try to help veterans find jobs. He added that May 27th iS Veterans Appreciation Day. B3. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May 8-14, 2005, as "Wildfire Awareness Week." Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented the Proclamation to Fire Chief Peter Bryan and Dennis Cisneros and Jacob Stein from the Fire Safe Council. Fire Chief Peter Bryan talked about the function of the Fire Safe Council. Dennis Cisneros informed everyone that the Fire Safe Council was organized after the Grand Prix Fires in 2003. He stated they need the public's help to prevent this type of thing occurring again. He encouraged people to attend their meetings to help prevent wild fires. B4. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May 16-20, 2005, as "Business Appreciation Week." City Council Minutes May 4, 2005 Page 2 Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented the Proclamation to Dominic Melillo of the Chamber of Commerce. B5. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring May 8-14, 2005, as "Building Safety Week." Mayor Alexander and the City Council presented the Proclamation to Trang Huynh, Building Official, and John Thomas, Plan Check Manager. Mayor Alexander commended them for the great job the Building and Safety staff does. c. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS C1. Fire Chief Peter Bryan stated he is leading a team of 95 personnel that fight fires and provide safety for the public. He commented on the strategic plan they are developing and stated staff is listening to the public about fire safety and other emergency services. He referred to overheads, which are on file in the City Clerk's office. He asked for the public's support as they develop the strategic plan and indicated this will be presented to the City Council once completed. C2. Steve Marston stated he talked at the last Council meeting about group homes and a child molester that are on his street. He asked if the Council can put money in the budget to do something to help him. He stated his neighbors are also against this. Mayor Alexander asked what it was that he wants the City to do. Mr. Marston asked that the City Council take notice and do something about this situation. Mayor Alexander suggested they have a meeting to talk about this further. Councilmember Williams asked if these people make good money for their group homes. Mr. Marston stated they probably make about $20,000 to $30,000 per month on a house. Councilmember Williams felt something should be done so these homes are screened out more. Councilmember Gutierrez felt the City should use its clout to talk to legislators about the group homes. C3. John Lyons stated he would like to see a letter grade system for the group homes. He stated he wanted to talk about response times in the City and added he would like to see more stations on the west end of town. He felt there should be a two-man squad developed for the west end of town. He felt people could be dieing because of poor response times, which is due to all of the development in the City. He felt a squad should be added at station 1 to help with the response time problem. C4. Hilda Phillips stated she went back to Princeton and talked about Rancho Cucamonga and the Freedom's Flame project that the City is involved in. She commented on the Freedom's Flame tower that is in New York and stated it is 1,176 feet high. She felt people from all over will come to Rancho Cucamonga to see our Freedom's Flame project. She stated she felt the Freedom's Flame should be put in Central Park, but does not see a space planned for it. She wished the City Council would find a space there for this project. C5. Jerry Liskobarda, 5372 Via Sereen, stated she was just advised of where her closest fire station is and feels that is very dangerous. She stated a ten-minute response time is too long because there could be loss of life and property. She asked what is going to be done to protect her area this summer. She wished there was something that could be done now instead of waiting years before action is taken. City Council Minutes May4,2005 Page 3 C6. Chris Kazinski, Marble Street, felt there should be a fire station provided within a reasonable location in order to protect the community. He stated the east side of town has received 3 new stations, but felt the northwest section of the City should be taken care of and protected. He stated he was surprised that Councilmembers Gutierrez, Williams and Michael did not vote for a community advisory public safety group to deal with these issues. C7. Susan Kazinski, Marble and Sapphire, talked about her asthma problem and the number of times she has called the fire department because of it. She stated time is critical for her. She commented on the paramedic program that was developed by Dennis Michael when he was Fire Chief and stated she is very grateful for it. She felt it was deplorable that there are not more fire stations and more protection on the west end of the City. She stated she is demanding another station like the one that was put up so quickly as requested by the people on the east side of town. C8. Jim Frost commented on the run for the wall event that is coming up. He stated it is a motorcycle run that goes across country into Arlington Cemetery where a wreath is presented at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier and on the Viet Nam Wall Memorial. He stated this started in 1989. He added that two weeks from today at 8:00 a.m. this run will start and go across the Country. He hoped the City would be represented at this event. C9. Guy Eisenbrae, resident for 30 years, felt the people on the west side of the City should get together to form a public safety district in order to pay for a fire station on the west side of town. C10..Bill McCliman stated the citizens of the City support the Fire District. He commented on the 2-:3 vote against the Public Safety Commission. He stated the people are supporting the firemen, and felt the Council should make public safety their No. 1 priority. He felt a Resolution should be developed so that when the Chief submits his strategic plan, 90 days later, a Resolution of the Council be adopted so the City is in compliance with the national standards. He stated he attended a meeting of Metrolink and that they are going to increase their fares. He stated the City was not represented at this meeting. He felt the town hall meetings Councilmember Williams had suggested to deal with public safety issues would not work. He asked the City Council to support the Resolution and quit having 3-2 votes. C11. Janie Canales stated she is present tonight in order to try to get improvements made at the animal shelter. She stated the stories relating to the shelter continue to get worse. She stated she was treated rude at the shelter when her Grandma's dog got lost. She stated she contacted HOPE to help her. She asked that the City Council help the animals. C12. A lady (did not identify herself) with Chaffey College, stated a Cinco de Mayo celebration will be held tomorrow and asked the citizens to attend and eat the 11,000 tacos they have planned. She stated the event will help others and encouraged people to go to Chaffey College tomorrow from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m. C13. A lady (did not identify herself) talked about veterans and the run for the wall event. She felt everyone should thank a veteran for what they have done for all of us. C14. Jim Townsend stated he was moved by Jim Frost's and Dr. Willingham's comments. He hoped veterans will be thanked and encouraged to apply for public safety jobs when they do come home. He thanked them for fighting for everyone's freedom. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated item DIO has a typo in the title and indicated the corrected name should read "Western System Power Pool Management Agreement" as identified in the memo distributed to the Council, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. City Council Minutes May 4, 2005 Page 4 D1. Approval of Warrants, Register 4/13/05 through 4/26/05, and Payroll ending 4/26/05, for the total amount of $3,432,616.44. D2. Approval to authorize the advedising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Banyan Curb Return Project, to be funded by Acct. No. 11243035650/1460. RESOLUTION NO. 05-150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND BANYAN AVENUE CURB RETURN PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D3. Approval of City Co-Sponsorship of the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All Star Game (CO 05-035) at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on June 6th (practice game) and June 8, 2005 (game date). D4. Approval of a single source vendor selection and award of a contract for the purchase of an IBM p520 2-Way 1.65 GHz SMP Server from IBM (CO 05-036) in the total amount of $29,900.00, and authorization to appropriate $29,900.00 from the Computer Equipment Replacement Fund into Acct. No. 1714001-5605. D5. Approval to purchase Caltrans excess property located north of the 210 Freeway and south of Highland Avenue between Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue, parcel Nos. 013406-01-01, 007352- 01-01 and 014758-01-01 as shown on Caltrans RNV Map Nos. 437511-12-, 13, and 15, respectively, to be funded from Acct. No. 11203055650/1335120-0, and approval of resolutions certifying that the City agrees to accept, by separate resolutions, Parcel Nos. 013406-01-01, 007352-01-01 and 014758-0101, and approval of an appropriation of $606,520 to Acct. No. 11203055650/1335120-0 from Park Development (Fund 120) fund balance. RESOLUTION NO. 05-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY AGREES TO ACCEPT PARCEL NO. 013406-01-01, LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN AMETHYST STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE RESOLUTION NO. 05-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY AGREES TO ACCEPT PARCEL NO. 007352-01-01, LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN AMETHYST STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE RESOLUTION NO. 05-153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY AGREES TO ACCEPT PARCEL NO. 014758-01-01, LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN AMETHYST STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE D6. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract with JDC, Inc. (CO 05-037) of Rancho Cucamonga for the "Citywide Concrete Repair, Tree Removal and Tree Planting Annual Maintenance Agreement Re-Negotiable on a Year-to-Year Basis" in the amount of $350,000 for FY 2004/2005 from Measure "1" Fund 1176303-5300. City Council Minutes May4,2005 Page 5 D7. Approval of agreement with the County of San Bernardino (CO 05-038) to provide the City with $300,000 in one-time funding for the Construction of the Victoria Gardens Library. D8. Approval of a Resolution of Intention to consider revisions to facilities authorized to be financed by and the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes authorized to be levied within Community Facilities District No. 2000-3 (Rancho Summit) and the authorized bonded indebtedness thereof. RESOLUTION NO. 05-154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF INTENTION TO CONSIDER REVISIONS TO FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY AND THE RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES AUTHORIZED TO BE LEVIED WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-3 (RANCHO SUMMIT) AND THE AUTHORIZED BONDED INDEBTEDNESS THEREOF D9. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 16262, generally located between Archibald Avenue and Klusman Avenue, approximately 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road, submitted by Toll CA IV, L.P. and release of previously submitted improvement agreement and improvement security previously accepted by City Council an June 4, 2003, from Piedra Architectural Development. RESOLUTION NO. 05-155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16262 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 4, 2003 D10. Approval to authorize the City Manager to enter into the Western System Power Two! Pool Agreement (WSPP Agreement) (CO 05-039), subject to any modifications approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney; approve the one-time WSPP membership fee of $25,000, to be funded from Acct. No. 17053035160; authorize the City Manager to execute the Confirmation Agreements under the WSPP Agreement in amounts necessary to provide electric service to customers, to be funded from Acct. No. 17053035209; and appropriate $25,000 to Acct. No. 17053035160 from Municipal Utility Fund Balance. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Spagnolo to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar as corrected. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. A recess was taken at 8:50 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:00 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. No Items Submitted. City Council Minutes May 4, 2005 Page 6 II F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO THE TIMF LIMIT ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE TIME LIMIT TO REPAY INDEBTEDNESS OR RECEIVE PROPERTY TAXES PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODF SECTION 33670 ON ACCOUNT OF THE AGENCY'S FISCAL YEAR 2004-05 ERAF PAYMENT See RDA item E1 for discussion and action. ORDINANCE NO. 742 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(e)(2)(D) F2. CONSIDERATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND ANNUAL ACTION PLAN - A review of the federally-required 2005-2009 Consolidated Plan and 2005-2006 Annual Action Plan, which includes the final selection of CDBG projects, based on a new grant allocation of $1,134,608. A staff report was presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. Councilmember Williams stated she appreciates the thorough report given by Mr. Grahn. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Nacho Gracia thanked the Council for their consideration of the rehab of the streets in the Northtown area. He invited everyone to their Cinco de Mayo celebration to be held Saturday from 12:00 to 5:00 p.m. in the Northtown area. Mayor Alexander thanked former Mayor Dennis Stout for his commitment to the Northtown area. There being no further input, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez recommendations. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. II to approve the final plan and staff's G. PUBLIC HEARINGS I Gl. APPROVAL OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CO 05-040) FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY HOME CONSORTIUM A staff report was presented by Tom Grahn, Associate Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve CO 05-040. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes May4,2005 Page 7 II H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS I H1. UPDATE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT OF FOUR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON THE WEST SIDF OF KLUSMAN AVENUE, NORTH OF DIAMOND AVENUF - Development Review DRC2003-00015 - Carney. A staff report was presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Councilmember Michael commented on the planting still to be done. He stated he went up to the house this afternoon and that he could not see down into the people's yards through the windows because they are so high. He asked if this project was approved for four homes. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated yes. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public input. Addressing the City Council were: Klm Feiton, Diamond, stated this was originally approved for no windows on the backside and was to include enhanced landscaping. She asked why there was not another public hearing when things changed. A lady (did not identify herself) stated it was an oxymoron to have windows you could not see through, yet they still open. She stated it was originally approved that there would be no windows. She stated she does not understand this. She did not feel the windows should be able to be opened up. She felt if someone says something they should stand behind it. Sherdl[ Ichiho stated it was suggested to her that she put in a tree in her backyard to block her view. She stated she does not want a tree around her pool because of the mess. She stated she felt no windows means no windows. She stated she does not want any trees in her backyard. Councilmember Gutierrez felt it would be fair for the developer to have the three windows on the backside closed not openable and have the landscaping enhanced to include good sized trees. He felt something should be done about this if at all possible. Councilmember Spagnolo asked to see a design drawing of the windows. Brad Buller, City Planner displayed a picture of the homes so the Council could see the design of the windows. Mayor Alexander suggested the Council all go tour the houses inside. He stated he does not agree with enhanced landscaping for the new homes because he felt the buyers could take it out. He stated he would like to continue working on this to get a resolution. He stated he would like this continued so the Council can view the lots. Gouncilmember Gutierrez felt this should be revisited. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to visit the site and continue this item to the May 18, 2005 meeting. The residents should be contacted so they can by part of the site visits with the contractor. Councilmember Williams asked the residents to give their names and numbers so the Council can contact them. City Council Minutes May4,2005 Page 8 Councilmember Michael asked that the Building and Safety and Planning Departments check the windows to see if they can be replaced so they are stationary windows. He felt the developer should meet with the residents that are concerned. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. H2. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CENTRAL PARK DEDICATION CEREMONY. A power point presentation was given by Francie Palmer, Marketing Manager, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. ACTION: Report received and filed. [I I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Spagnolo commented on the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and encouraged people to buy a brick, chair or table to help support the fundraising efforts. He stated the fire fighters are having their car show at Red Hill Park on June 26 and also commented on the commemoration of Ron Ives to be held September 1st. He corrected previous comments made in the newspaper on the membership of the proposed Public Safety Commission. He stated it was his intent for three of them to have public safety background, that they were not to be picked from our departments. He stated the $340,000 for staffing to run the Public Safety Commission was inaccurate. He stated that number was high because the Engineering/Traffic area had many items that were brought to the Commission to be dealt with. Councilmember Williams stated she attended the Small Business Person of the Year Breakfast and that Joseph and Gino Filippi were honored. She stated she attended a badge pinning for a new fire fighter also. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is happy that discussions are being held with the FAA regarding the stunt flying being done over the hillside area. He felt this is going in a good direction. He felt possibly in the future more red light cameras should be installed to help law enforcement. He stated he is happy the City will hopefully hire more officers. He felt the synchronization of traffic lights should be done. He felt group homes should be looked at. He stated Wilson Avenue to the east will have some street repairs done to improve the area. He felt landscaping should be kept up at all residences. He stated he did not see there being another high school built in the foothills and that it should go to Fontana. He stated he would be introducing a Resolution about people selling hot food from pushcarts. He felt this should be regulated because of the health issue. Mayor Alexander stated Grace Curatalo, former Councilwoman, is improving. He asked the City Manager if there are eleven new officers being hired by the Police Depadment. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this is being proposed in the budget to hire more officers. He stated there were some hired this year as a result of the substation. He stated we will also be receiving grant funding for a couple more officers. He stated because of the lowering of the booking fees through State legislation, the department retained six civilian service officers (non-sworn). 12. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (Oral) Councilmember Williams stated next week is Legislative Action Days in Sacramento in order to meet with our legislators. She stated the State is still balancing its budget on the backs of cities. She stated the City will be hosting legislators and will tell them about issues that are important to us. City Council Minutes May 4, 2005 Page 9 13. DISCUSSION OF ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES PROVIDER Mayor Alexander stated there have been numerous instances that have occurred at the animal shelter which need improvement, which include a no kill shelter. He felt it was clear to him that San Bernardino County is incapable of providing good care for the City. He stated he would like for the City Council to consider phasing out San Bernardino County from the animal shelter. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: Two little girls asked that someone help run the animal shelter because her Mom always cries when she goes there. Dawn Pendziwiatr stated she is excited about the microchipping program getting started. She felt it takes too long to get things done and felt something should happen so the shelter can start fresh. Nicole Myerchin felt the Council should vote to remove the County's contract within a certain period of time and vote to approve a no kill City run facility. She talked about the documentation she has concerning all of the animals that have been treated cruelly at the shelter. She felt the Council should do what is honorable. She felt the Council should be leaders and save animals. She continued to talk about her visits to the shelter. She felt it was time to get rid of the County contract now. A lady (did not identify herself) talked about the cats in need. She commented on her visit to the shelter and what she found. She stated there are cats being put down when there are empty cages. She stated the County is not following the 30-day hold policy. She stated she doesn't know why the County is not doing anything to change and hoped the County would be voted out of the shelter. Bill McCliman was not sure why this is taking so long. He felt the people speaking know what they are talking about and felt the City should do something to help this situation. He felt a new contract should be signed with someone else. Alton Corey stated he was associated with "Fresh Start." He felt that most of the people he talks to are in favor of a no kill shelter. He felt the Council was open-minded to this concept and felt this would work for our community. A lady (did not identify herself) stated she felt people want the no kill shelter and that the City should get rid of the County contract. Edan Hickman told about her experience at the animal shelter with a cat that got killed because of a computer error. Tad Myerchin thanked all the people that spoke about the animals and thanked the Mayor for bringing up the idea of changing the County contract. He felt it was past time to do something about the shelter. A man (did not identify himself) felt the County should be out of the shelter, but did not want Pomona Valley either. He stated he was afraid his animals would get killed if they ever ended up at the shelter. A lady (did not identify herself) stated she agrees with everybody's comments and felt the employees at the shelter should be accountable. She felt the City should run its own shelter. Susan McGrail stated she is a foster mom but does not like to do this with the County in the shelter. City Council Minutes May 4, 2005 Page 10 Dan Avera, County Public Health, stated next week there will be a change in supervision and a change in how the shelter is operated. He stated in the last three months the number of dogs that have gone to the shelter is 481, and 400 of those have been returned to their owner or adopted. He felt that was a significant improvement over previous months at the shelter. He stated they plan on working with rescue groups and other measure to help get the animals adopted and rescued. Councilmember Spagnolo stated he has learned a lot about this over the last six months. He felt staff should be directed to develop a change of hands plan and a transition plan. He stated he would like to move the County out and move the City in. Councilmember Williams stated she was at least hoping the County would apologize for what recently occurred at the shelter, but this did not happen. She stated they did not acknowledge the mistake that was made. She stated just because someone says there is going to be change is not enough and would like a guarantee this will not happen again. She stated she would like to know what changes are going to be made. She felt the studies that have been approved should possibly be redirected so we can look at other options that will tell how we can get to where we are wanting to go. She agreed we need to work towards a transition plan and see what we can do in the interim. She wanted Mr. Winograd to do his job and continue his study so we can hear what he recommends to help the City get where it wants to be with this. She felt the County employees need to be sent to charm school. Councilmember Michael stated he was surprised at the County's behavior over the latest incident. He hoped the City will never see this happen again. He felt we should move forward with the transition, but felt this should be done with a lot of forethought. He asked how long it would take to go through the process to get someone else to run the shelter. Jack Lam, City Manager, staff has already been in contact with Mr. Winograd and that he is cautious on how to transition a shelter. He stated the City will want to get his advise about this process. He stated if the Council so directs, the staff can work with Mr. Winograd on the Council's options and a transition plan. He felt Mr. Winograd's recommendation would be any transition would not occur until the fall season. Councilmember Michael stated he would be willing to expand the scope of work for Mr. Winograd and appropriate additional dollars so further study can be done. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated there would be a transition period involved when you try to do something like this. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, stated Mr. Winograd suggested a six-month transition period from the County to the City. Councilmember Michael indicated there are two contracts with the County - one for shelter services and one for animal control services. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst ~11, stated both of these contracts would have to be looked at. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he is also surprised that the last incident happened. He did not feel this should ever happen again. He felt alternatives should be looked at and that a no kill shelter has been one of the goals for many years. He stated it would take many years to hire new staff. Mayor Alexander stated he would like the City to set a goal of a transition not to exceed 120 days. He stated it would require the City to work with the County for this transition. He felt there needs to be a continued review of what the County is doing at Rancho Cucamonga's shelter, i.e., communications, inspections, etc. MOTION: Moved by Alexander to set a goal of 120 days for the transition and to secure assistance of Mr. Winograd to help with this. City Council Minutes May 4, 2005 Page 11 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the staff would work with Mr. Winograd on this. Councilmember Spagnolo stated this could be the goal, but that policies and procedures need to be set. Councilmember Williams felt there might be other options other than the City running the shelter. Councilmember Spagnolo felt the City has looked at other options for running the shelter and the only one left is the City running the shelter. Michelle Dawson, Management Analyst III, indicated Mr. Winograd felt if his contract is amended he felt he could come up with a transition plan of six months. Mayor Alexander felt expanding the services of Mr. Winograd should move forward and to advise him we are anxious to get this done. He stated again the shelter should be monitored. Councilmember Michael hoped this could be done by the end of the year. Nicole Myerchin stated Mr. Winograd felt he could get the job descriptions for shelter staff done fairly quickly. She stated Mr. Arms is also willing to help out. She felt the animal control services also should be transitioned. MOTION: Moved by Alexander to inform the County of the intent to terminate both contracts bya 30-day notice with the intent to transition to a full City service animal control and care program as soon as possible, not to exceed a period of six months (as a goal). It would be the intent to have the County help us during this transition phase and not create difficulties by working with the City. Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney, felt formal termination of the County contracts should be placed on a future agenda for approval. Mayor Alexander stated he would like this agendized for the next meeting. Councilmember Guti.errez felt budget should also be looked at to see what this is going to cost. He suggested a chain of authority also be set with Mr. Winograd so he knows who to take direction from. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo to discuss at the May 18, 2005 meeting the discontinuation of services by the County and amending Mr. Winograd's contract to include studying the City having its own animal care and control services. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. [[ J. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: The meeting adjourned at 11:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Check No. Check Date AP - 00222758 5/11/2005 AP - 00222759 5/11/2005 AP - 00222759 5/11/2005 AP - 00222759 5/11/2005 AP - 00222759 5/11/2005 AP - 00222760 5/11/2005 AP - 00222761 5/11/2005 AP - 00222762 5/11/2005 AP - 00222762 5/11/2005 AP - 00222763 5/11/2005 AP - 00222764 5/11/2005 AP - 00222766 5/11/2005 AP - 00222767 5/11/2005 AP - 00222768 5/11/2005 AP - 00222769 5/11/2005 AP - 00222770 5/11/2005 AP ~ 00222770 5/11/2005 AP - 00222771 5/11/2005 AP - 00222772 5/11/2005 AP - 00222773 5/11/2005 AP - 00222773 5/11/2005 AP - 00222774 5/11/2005 AP - 00222775 5/11/2005 AP - 00222776 5/11/2005 AP - 00222777 5/11/2005 AP - 00222777 5/I 1/2005 AP - 00222778 5/11/2005 AP - 00222778 5/l 1/2005 AP - 00222778 5/11/2005 AP - 00222778 5/11/2005 AP - 00222780 5/11/2005 AP - 00222782 5/11/2005 AP - 00222783 5/I 1/2005 AP - 00222784 5/11/2005 AP - 00222784 5/11/2005 AP - 00222784 5/11/2005 AP - 00222786 5/11/2005 AP - 00222786 5/11/2005 AP - 00222787 5/I ~/2005 AP - 00222788 5/11/2005 AP - 00222788 5/11/2005 AP - 00222789 5/11/2005 AP - 00222790 5/11/2005 AP - 00222791 5/11/2005 AP - 00222792 5/11/2005 AP - 00222793 5/11/2005 AP - 00222794 5/11/2005 AP - 00222795 5/11/2005 AP - 00222796 5/11/2005 AP - 00222797 5/11/2005 AP - 00222798 5/11/2005 AP - 00222799 5/11/2005 AP - 00222800 5/11/2005 AP - 00222801 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB INC ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABC LOCKSMITHS ABLAC ADAMS, DEBRA ADAMSON, RONALD ADAMSON, RONALD ADVANCO FIRE PROTECTION INC ALL CITIES TOOLS ALPERT PRINTING ALPHAGRAPHICS ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO AMERICAN BODY ARMOR & EQUIPMENT INC. AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. AMERICAN CLASSIC SANITATION INC. AMERICAN LANDSCAPE INC AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC. AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC ARMOR HOLDINGS FORENSICS INC ARROW TRUCK BODIES AND EQUIPMENT INC ASSI SECURITY ASSI SECURITY B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE BEARINGS & DRIVES INC. BIGHAM, TROY BOTTLE FREE WATER CO. BRODART BOOKS BRODART BOOKS BRODART BOOKS BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYSTEMS BUSINESS MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTIONS BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. BYRNE, MAGGIE CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE CAMPBELL, JANE CCPOA CENTRAL CITIES SIGNS CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT CHEMSEARCH CHRIS JOHNSTON CONSULTING CHU, FUMIE CIVIC SOLUTIONS 1NC CLABBY, SANDRA CLARK, KAREN CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. Amount 10.21 6.09 539.94 426.69 487.03 16.39 29.16 1,122.00 1,188.00 500.00 77.53 556.68 184.54 44.78 661.50 179.11 155.40 86,161.91 683.10 250.00 184.68 10,067.99 105.20 24.78 1,530.00 840.00 88.28 205.80 162.42 505.08 86.74 20.00 818.31 849.22 258.41 2,548.19 425.76 629.34 119.00 8,496.55 11,737.32 250.00 231.92 40.00 30.00 285.54 336.00 430.48 808.13 34.00 14,800.00 1,000.00 30.00 169.34 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Po~'ait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time:2 15:24:5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00222801 5/11/2005 AP - 00222801 5/11/2005 AP - 00222801 5/11/2005 AP - 00222801 5/11/2005 AP - 00222801 5/11/2005 AP - 00222801 5/11/2005 AP - 00222802 5/11/2005 AP - 00222803 5/11/2005 AP - 00222803 5/11/2005 AP - 00222806 5/11/2005 AP - 00222806 5/11/2005 AP - 00222807 5/11/2005 AP - 00222807 5/11/2005 AP - 00222807 5/11/2005 AP - 00222807 5/11/2005 AP - 00222807 5/11/2005 AP - 00222808 5/11/2005 AP - 00222809 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/t 1/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP ~ 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/I 1/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP- 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/I 1/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES 1NC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. COLOR ME MINE COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS ] CPRS DISTRICT XI CRRA CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCANIONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Amount 49.52 136.75 94.13 74.03 207.52 203.67 135.00 95.60 465.76 438.00 230.00 86.72 584.52 830.75 448.72 52.88 395.00 260.00 1,492.69 195.66 6,590.53 239.43 77.08 151.08 88.01 84.02 33.68 35.99 45.25 246.32 211.73 316.60 173.89 1,281.49 452.94 294.70 53.57 18.40 95.58 188.29 154.66 58.28 217.80 118.96 36.80 114.48 194.16 101.82 143.82 101.30 2,922.99 157.83 390.00 438.37 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portxait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time: 15:24:5 Check No. Cheek Date AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/I 1/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP ~ 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP -00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222812 5/11/2005 AP - 00222813 5/11/2005 AP - 00222814 5/11/2005 AP - 00222814 5/11/2005 AP - 00222814 5/11/2005 AP - 00222816 5/11/2005 AP - 00222817 5/11/2005 AP - 00222818 5/11/2005 AP ~ 00222819 5/11/2005 AP - 00222820 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT D 7 CONSULTING 1NC D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES DE LEISE, JENAE DEL MECHANICAL DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Amount 46.57 129.51 150.95 61.77 118.55 69.98 107.39 67.63 34.22 232.66 34.22 68.80 248.10 26.01 300.60 952.15 646.50 68.33 1,107.67 457.95 778.49 622.30 154.47 130.24 86.57 59.41 96.84 33.68 78.37 124.35 66.68 112.68 148.83 246.79 26.01 228.12 27.17 22.51 24.84 286.56 447.12 1,914.15 105.68 643.14 165.73 300.00 374.97 1,036.38 913.72 8,400.00 519.24 309.52 165.60 12,835.35 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Tim~,~ 15:24:5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00222821 5/11/2005 AP - 00222821 5/11/2005 AP - 00222822 5/11/2005 AP - 00222823 5/11/2005 AP - 00222824 5/11/2005 AP - 00222825 5/11/2005 AP - 00222826 5/11/2005 AP - 00222827 5/11/2005 AP - 00222827 5/11/2005 AP - 00222827 5/11/2005 AP - 00222827 5/11/2005 AP - 00222827 5/11/2005 AP - 00222829 5/11/2005 AP - 00222829 5/11/2005 AP - 00222831 5/11/2005 AP - 00222831 5/11/2005 AP - 00222832 5/11/2005 AP - 00222833 5/11/2005 AP - 00222834 5/11/2005 AP - 00222835 5/11/2005 AP - 00222836 5/11/2005 AP - 00222839 5/11/2005 AP - 00222840 5/11/2005 AP - 00222841 5/11/2005 AP - 00222842 5/11/2005 AP - 00222843 5/11/2005 AP - 00222844 5/11/2005 AP - 00222845 5/11/2005 AP - 00222846 5/11/2005 AP - 00222847 5/11/2005 AP - 00222849 5/11/2005 AP - 00222850 5/11/2005 AP - 0022285 t 5/I 1/2005 AP - 00222851 5/11/2005 AP - 00222852 5/11/2005 AP - 00222852 5/11/2005 AP - 00222852 5/11/2005 AP - 00222853 5/11/2005 AP - 00222854 5/11/2005 AP - 00222854 5/11/2005 AP - 00222856 5/11/2005 AP - 00222857 5/11/2005 AP - 00222858 5/11/2005 AP - 00222859 5/11/2005 AP - 00222860 5/11/2005 AP - 00222861 5/11/2005 AP - 00222863 5/11/2005 AP - 00222863 5/11/2005 AP - 00222863 5/11/2005 AP - 00222863 5/11/2005 AP - 00222863 5/11/2005 AP - 00222864 5/11/2005 AP - 00222865 5/11/2005 AP - 00222865 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re~ister 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DICKINSON JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION EMCOR SERVICE EMCOR SERVICE EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS F S MOTOR SPORTS INC FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC FILARSKY AND WATT FILTER RECYCLING SERVICE 1NC FISHER SCIENTIFIC FJS CABLE ENGINEERING 1NC FLEET GLASS FOREMOST FRONT BRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES FUKUSHIMA, JUDITH GADABOUT TOURS INC GARRETT CONCRETE CORING AND SAWING GEIGER BROTHERS WEST GILES, BARBARA GIN, CATHERINE GONZALEZ, TINA GONZALEZ, TINA GRAINGER, WW GRAINGER, WW GRAINGER, WW GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GRESSCO LTD GRESSCO LTD HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO HAHN, SOONAM HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY HAUSER, L1NDA HERRERA, IVETTE HEWLETT PACKARD EXPRESS SERVICES HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC INC HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Amount 1,106.00 1,140.00 178,200.00 194,400.00 233,100.00 145.22 103.33 23.08 183.93 281.54 97.73 157.58 10,920.42 10,920.42 240.80 -13.65 200.00 8.45 3,088.80 3,898.27 267.75 450.52 1,000.00 38.50 3,212.57 884.00 3,195.00 200.00 190.00 172.16 20.00 30.00 40.00 30.00 15.37 230.32 21.17 169.13 2,130.92 -1,805.26 1,402.62 30.00 601.84 40.00 68.00 2,191.64 384.41 211.70 95.90 290.40 171.83 393.29 47.92 466.54 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time: q 15:24:5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00222865 5/11/2005 AP - 00222865 5/11/2005 AP - 00222865 5/11/2005 AP - 00222865 5/11/2005 AP - 00222866 5/11/2005 AP - 00222867 5/11/2005 AP - 00222868 5/11/2005 AP - 00222869 5/11/2005 AP - 00222870 5/11/2005 AP - 00222871 5/11/2005 AP - 00222871 5/11/2005 AP - 00222872 5/11/2005 AP - 00222873 5/11/2005 AP - 00222873 5/11/2005 AP - 00222874 5/11/2005 AP - 00222875 5/11/2005 AP - 00222875 5/11/2005 AP - 00222878 5/11/2005 AP - 00222878 5/11/2005 AP - 00222879 5/11/2005 AP - 00222880 5/11/2005 AP - 00222880 5/11/2005 AP - 00222881 5/11/2005 AP - 00222881 5/11/2005 AP - 00222882 5/11/2005 AP - 00222883 5/11/2005 AP - 00222884 5/11/2005 AP - 00222885 5/11/2005 AP - 00222886 5/11/2005 AP - 00222887 5/11/2005 AP - 00222889 5/11/2005 AP - 00222890 5/11/2005 AP - 00222890 5/11/2005 AP - 00222892 5/11/2005 AP - 00222893 5/11/2005 AP - 00222894 5/11/2005 AP - 00222895 5/11/2005 AP - 00222896 5/11/2005 AP - 00222897 5/11/2005 AP - 00222899 5/11/2005 AP - 00222900 5/11/2005 AP - 00222901 5/11/2005 AP - 00222902 5/11/2005 AP - 00222903 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 AP - 00222904 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOSE MAN INC HOYT LUMBER CO., SM HUANG, PRUDENCE HULS ENVIRONMENTAL MGT LLC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS [NC IAAIvl IBM CORPORATION IBM CORPORATION IMES, ROSEMARY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY COMPANY [NTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND [NC INTRAVAIA ROCK AND SAND INC IVY LEATHERWORKS-BACON HOLSTER CO JDCINC JD C 1NC JANECEK, LYNDA JANECEK, L[NDA KAMRANI, JOSEPH KASTEN, NANCY KB HOME KELLEY BLUE BOOK KELLY EQUIPMENT L A SANTA ANITA LLC LAIDLAW TRANSIT [NC LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS DIGEST LIL STITCH ABRAHAM LINCOLN PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY LLOYD HENRY INTERIOR DESIGNS LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER LOZANO, AVEL1NO MAIN STREET SIGNS MALIER CONTRACTORS MANELA, ROSARIO MARCIA'S VERMICULTURE COMPOST MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARiPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC Amount 237.85 221.80 10.04 10.01 56.01 33.87 1,350.00 11,182.50 539.10 156.42 26.74 57.71 923.13 70.40 60.00 61.22 172.36 361.70 140.00 231.66 8,686.00 914.00 46.17 79.02 27.77 40.00 500.00 64.35 82.96 453,171.74 753.88 3,000.00 600.00 35.00 45.00 669.13 2.70 56,309.18 51.11 25O.00 149.50 500.00 122.31 300.00 3,514.87 1,205.51 8,287.69 4,552.22 3,727.47 17,618.60 8,398.60 124.63 35,260.00 1,563.71 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time~ 15:24:5 Check No. AP-00222904 AP-00222904 AP-00222905 AP-00222907 AP-00222908 AP-00222909 AP-00222910 AP-00222911 AP 00222912 AP 00222912 AP 00222913 AP 00222914 AP 00222915 AP 00222916 AP 00222917 AP 00222918 AP 00222918 AP 00222919 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP-00222921 AP-00222921 AP-00222921 Check Date 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/I 1/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/I 1/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT [NC MARK, ROBERT MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES MEGA WAY ENTERPRISES MIDWEST TAPE MISSION REPROGRAPHICS MOORE, DAVE $ MOUNTArN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR NATIONAL DEFERRED NATIONS RENT NINYO AND MOORE GEOTECHNICAL NOLO PRESS O C B REPROGRAPHICS INC OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFG OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO OCLC INC OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT Amount 2,768.76 4,842.27 65.00 41,352.92 44,020.10 216.90 42.66 30.00 249.71 2,892.24 15,626.18 56.30 5,171.25 55.72 48.49 47.60 47.60 49.62 25.92 15.38 103.34 3.99 40.98 91.21 408.07 41.31 48.15 14.37 26.38 152.12 91.37 77.87 187.72 111.12 -247.42 15.70 247.42 117.59 -111.12 10.84 36.07 6.47 10.84 -133.34 127.21 14.27 16.40 164.22 62.67 14.44 1,051.12 28.35 51.20 8.76 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time:~ 15:24:5 CheekNo. AP-00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP 00222921 AP-00222921 AP-00222923 AP-00222924 AP-00222924 AP-00222924 AP-00222924 AP-00222925 AP-00222927 AP-00222928 AP-00222930 AP-00222931 AP-00222932 AP- 00222933 AP-00222934 AP- 00222935 AP-00222936 AP-00222937 AP-00222938 AP- 00222939 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP- 00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222940 AP-00222941 AP-00222942 AP-00222943 AP-00222944 AP-00222945 Check Date 5/11/2005 5/I 1/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OUTDOOR DIMENSIONS OWEN ELECTRIC OWEN ELECTRIC OWEN ELECTRIC OWEN ELECTRIC PACIFIC PLUMBING SPECIALTIES PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC PARKER, CRISTINA PEP BOYS PHASE II SYSTEMS POMONA PRINT STOP PORT SUPPLY PORTILLO, ADINA PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PRECISION DYNAMICS CORPORATION PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PYRO SPECTACULARS 1NC R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE R AND R AUTOMOTIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOLr~ RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE RCPFA RDO FINANCIAL SERVICES REINHARDT, RITA Amount 69.63 -90.19 158.13 50.71 64.11 9.14 25.25 80.61 500.00 36.20 58.57 18.10 26.46 280.97 238.28 250.00 97.90 3,500.00 107.75 75.41 88.03 6.81 400.59 940.15 7.00 84.00 57.26 43.79 387.97 41.92 39.28 71.92 31.92 31.16 42.89 31.92 3O.OO 40.00 58.89 283.88 823.56 28.95 341.40 219.60 343.35 43.21 233.91 643.07 111.25 10.00 23.06 6,860.51 1,210.69 312.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time~ 15:24:5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00222946 5/11/2005 AP - 00222946 5/11/2005 AP - 00222947 5/11/2005 AP - 00222947 5/11/2005 AP - 00222947 5/11/2005 AP - 00222948 5/11/2005 AP - 00222949 5/11/2005 AP - 00222949 5/11/2005 AP - 00222950 5/11/2005 AP - 00222950 5/11/2005 AP - 00222951 5/11/2005 AP - 00222952 5/11/2005 AP - 00222953 5/11/2005 AP - 00222954 5/11/2005 AP - 00222955 5/11/2005 AP - 00222955 5/11/2005 AP - 00222955 5/11/2005 AP - 00222956 5/11/2005 AP - 00222957 5/I 1/2005 AP - 00222958 5/11/2005 AP - 00222959 5/I 1/2005 AP - 00222960 5/I 1/2005 AP - 00222961 5/11/2005 AP - 00222962 5/11/2005 AP - 00222963 5/11/2005 AP - 00222964 5/11/2005 AP - 00222965 5/11/2005 AP - 00222966 5/11/2005 AP - 00222966 5/11/2005 AP - 00222967 5/11/2005 AP - 00222967 5/11/2005 AP - 00222968 5/11/2005 AP - 00222969 5/11/2005 AP - 00222970 5/11/2005 AP - 00222970 5/11/2005 AP - 00222970 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name REPUBLIC ELECTRIC REPUBLIC ELECTRIC REXEL CALCON REXEL CALCON REXEL CALCON RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT ROBLES SR, RAUL P ROBLES SR, PAUL P ROCHA, ALFRED SAGER, G.M. CONSTRUCTION SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNAKDINO COUNTY SAN BEKNAKDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OFFICE OF ASSES~ SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAN BERNARD1NO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SBC SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHING SCMAF INLAND VALLEYS SCWMF SELDON, MERVY'N SHESHUNOFF INTORMATION SERVICES SHOETERIA SIGN SHOP, THE SIGN SHOP, THE SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC SIMPLOT PARTNERS SMART AND FINAL SO CALIF OAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 15,734.74 4,408.70 208.59 31.72 150.43 119.00 133.83 31.55 85.00 60.00 250.00 1,000.00 786.20 24,295.90 46,638.24 6.19 42,804.96 1,659.74 815.30 6,869.04 9,797.83 294.16 1,950.00 20.00 40.00 230.95 116.36 921.26 100.36 222,377.70 -22,237.77 1,883.47 113.31 855.81 217.64 2,283.37 2,105.59 6,383.04 14.17 14.05 14.08 84.87 225.37 48.36 14.17 37.84 99.09 14.63 14.28 14.08 14.11 14.14 14.14 331.12 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time:~ 15:24:5 Check No.. Check Date AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 AP-00222974 5/11~005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP- 00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/I1~005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11~005 AP - 00222974 5/1 I~005 AP - 00222974 5/11~005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11~005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11~005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 AP-00222974 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN 5/11/2005 SOUTHERN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Re~ister 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 14.73 14.11 33.78 16.39 62.92 171.28 146.13 126.97 25.69 116.82 18.53 4,354.78 17.36 14.15 14.08 19.76 14.11 32.22 14.92 14.28 14.14 14.11 14.04 14.08 88.19 140.83 120.10 14.63 364.28 20.87 114.58 23.46 38.97 20.46 2,962.50 201.79 17,541.53 98.21 114.85 14.58 68.34 48.82 14.08 14.11 11.81 13.61 14.15 65.20 56.92 14.08 68.65 14.05 19.14 14.91 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTP~IT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time:q 15:24:5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222974 5/11/2005 AP - 00222975 5/11/2005 AP - 00222975 5/11/2005 AP - 00222975 5/11/2005 AP - 00222975 5/1 t/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 44.44 14.65 48.95 22.54 77.39 14.11 87.19 55.01 14.21 14.21 14.17 15.15 102.09 13.61 14.11 110.81 32.89 14.58 69.18 92.05 13.61 13.61 14.20 61.34 59.47 1,117.79 14.75 94.91 13.58 14.08 15.22 13.58 2.10 14.18 14.04 117.39 13.61 14.92 41.12 15.09 106.75 13.58 14.82 81.76 13.68 74.75 15.04 13.58 20,467.10 825.76 19,429.89 4,212.90 2,727.75 181.47 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Tim?0 15:24:5 CheckNo. AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP-00222975 AP 00222975 AP 00222975 AP 00222975 AP 00222975 AP 00222975 AP 00222976 AP-00222977 AP-00222978 AP-00222979 AP-00222980 AP~00222980 AP-00222981 AP-00222982 AP-00222983 AP-00222984 AP-00222986 AP-00222986 AP-00222986 AP-00222986 AP-00222987 AP-00222987 AP-00222987 AP-00222987 AP-00222988 AP-00222989 AP-00222990 AP-00222990 AP-00222991 AP-00222991 AP-00222993 AP-00222993 AP-00222994 AP-00222995 AP-00222995 AP-00222995 AP-00222995 AP-00222996 AP-00222996 AP-00222997 AP-00222998 AP-00222999 AP- 00222999 AP-00223001 Check Date 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5711/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHER31 CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHE1LN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS SPARKLETTS STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY STERICYCLE INC STERLING COFFEE SERVICE STERLING COFFEE SERVICE STONEFIELD DEVELOPMENT T AND D INSTALLATIONS T MOBILE TEREX UTILITIES WEST THE BAG CONNECTION YNC THE BAG CONNECTION INC THE BAG CONNECTION INC THE BAG CONNECTION INC THOMSON GALE THOMSON GALE THOMSON GALE THOMSON GALE TIME WARNER TELECOM TOBIN, RENEE TOMARK SPORTS INC TOMARK SPORTS INC TRAFFIC OPERATIONS TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 1NC UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UNDERGROUND TECffNOLOGY INC UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFIRST UNIFO1LM SERVICE UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC UNITED WAY UPS UPS US IDENTIFICATION MANUAL Amount 44.92 25.60 8,474.80 12,312.94 541.52 43.89 40.95 36.72 36,321.98 47.40 51.07 6,716.07 44.24 2,868.67 12,120.96 14,992.80 975.25 17.25 326.94 486.49 96.26 318.91 2,898.52 125.81 154.63 986.07 3,414.00 852.28 5,716.37 279.35 26.62 148.44 54.16 26.62 1,288.85 17.42 265.76 1,000.00 703.96 10,271.29 120.00 2,783.00 675.70 241.63 628.08 41.91 24.89 2,785.57 32,727.69 424.81 46.00 19.06 30.04 88.48 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time? / 15:24:5 Check No. AP-00223003 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP 00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223005 Check Date 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11~005 5/11~005 5/11~005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11~005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11~005 5/11~005 5/11~005 5/11~005 5/11~005 5/11~005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11~005 5/11/2005 5/11~005 5/11~005 5/11~005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/ll/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11~005 5/11/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name US POSTMASTER VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VEKIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VEKIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VEKIZON VEKIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VEKIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VEPdZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON Amount 7,500.00 86.39 29.37 467.75 59.68 74.82 55.15 91.75 91.75 90.67 91.75 181.42 27.88 90.67 90.67 20.55 20.55 27.78 91.65 91.75 90.67 91.75 91.02 91.75 91.75 1,559.43 139.06 110.85 29.50 91.75 38.66 38.66 30.91 29.37 90.67 20.55 28.55 56.33 28.71 20.55 148.99 28.41 29.37 30.22 132.66 33.81 29.37 20.55 20.55 30.66 29.71 29.13 28.41 91.75 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Page: 12 Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Tim7 2 15:24:5 CheckNo. AP-00223005 AP-00223005 AP-00223006 AP-00223007 AP-00223008 AP-00223008 AP-00223008 AP-00223008 AP-00223008 AP 00223008 AP 00223008 AP 00223008 AP 00223008 AP 00223008 AP 00223008 AP 00223008 AP 00223009 AP 00223010 AP 00223010 AP 00223010 AP 00223010 AP 00223010 AP 00223011 AP 00223012 AP 00223013 AP-00223014 AP-00223017 AP-00223018 AP-00223019 AP-00223021 AP-00223024 AP-00223024 AP-00223025 AP-00223027 AP-00223028 AP-00223029 AP-00223030 AP-00223030 AP-00223031 AP-00223031 AP-00223031 AP-00223031 AP-00223031 AP-00223032 AP-00223032 AP-00223033 AP-00223034 AP-00223034 AP-00223035 AP-00223035 AP-00223036 AP-00223036 AP-00223036 AP-00223038 Check Date 5/11/2005 5/11~005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/1 I~005 5/11~005 5/1 I~005 5/11~005 5/11/2005 5/11~005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/11/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18~005 5/18~005 5/18~005 5/18~005 5/18~005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18~005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 ttxrough 5/24/2005 Vendor Name VERIZON VERIZON VIGILANCE, TERRENCE VORTEX INDUSTRIES WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO WARREN & CO INC, CARL WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY WEST PAYMENT CENTER WILLIAMS, ERMA J WINSTAR DEVELOPMENT A AND K 30 MIN PHOTO LAB 1NC A-1 FENCE ABLAC ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL ALPERT PRINTING ALPERT PRINTING ALTA LOMA PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES AMERICAN RIVER COLLEGE ANDRADE, RAY APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC ARBOR NURSERY 1NC ARBOR NURSERY INC ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ASSI SECURITY ASSI SECURITY ASTRUM UTILITY SERVICES AUFBAU CORPORATION AUFBAU CORPORATION AZ~M, ALI M. AZAM, ALI M. BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BARNES AND NOBLE BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC Amount 43.55 118.69 400.00 530.02 897.73 301.70 336.90 67.12 67.70 47.93 128.84 66.83 145.47 187.42 130.53 16.14 1,282.56 368.53 466.77 280.15 283.08 78.79 41.81 53.90 20.00 500.00 6.62 2,292.00 273.17 50.00 2,020.72 10.01 3,700.00 278.00 65.00 10,067.99 302.79 876.00 220.90 188.90 120.68 364.05 157.00 515.00 190.00 17,258.90 9,472.00 11,840.00 190.00 200.00 279.17 271.02 621.21 10,035.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 13 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time~,~ 15:24:5 CheekNo. AP-00223038 AP-00223039 AP-00223040 AP-00223041 AP-00223042 AP-00223043 AP-00223044 AP-00223045 AP-00223046 AP-00223046 AP-00223046 AP-00223047 AP-00223048 AP-00223049 AP-00223050 AP 00223052 AP 00223053 AP 00223054 AP 00223057 AP 00223058 AP 00223059 AP 00223060 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP 00223061 AP- 00223061 AP-00223061 AP-00223063 AP-00223063 AP-00223063 AP-00223064 AP-00223065 AP-00223066 AP-00223066 AP-00223068 AP-00223069 AP-00223070 AP-00223071 AP-00223071 Check Date 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name BEARD PROVENCHER AND ASSOC BEN CLARK TRAINING CENTER BLOUNT, ANDREA BURKE, KAREN CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CALSENSE CALSENSE CALSENSE CAPE AccouNTING CASK N CLEAVER CDG MATERIALS INC CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT CHRIS JOHNSTON CONSULTING CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING INC. COELHO, ROBYN COURT TRUSTEE COURT TRUSTEE CRAFCO INC CST CORPORATION CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC CYBERCOM RESOURCES INC D 3 EQUIPMENT D AND B VISIONS D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY DAPPER TIRE CO DEER CREEK CAR CARE CENTER DELAGADO, GABRIELA DELTA MICROIMAGING [NC DELTA MICROIMAGING INC Amount 11,940.00 146.00 86.00 222.00 232.33 25.00 22.50 2,109.78 28.03 987.80 460.87 35.00 51.00 465.75 844.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 34.00 118.50 200.00 1,273.61 319.48 185.44 227.21 94.67 145.10 417.38 513.55 51.27 702.39 258.85 576.88 81.91 33.68 118.38 I39.07 373.98 103.04 489.69 166.14 468.59 535.39 175.00 350.00 5,075.00 74.65 750.00 702.53 620.64 84.89 85.50 150.00 659.82 2,743.81 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 14 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Tim? ~ 15:24:5 Check No. AP-00223072 AP-00223072 AP-00223072 AP-00223072 AP-00223073 AP-00223073 AP-00223074 AP-00223074 AP-00223075 AP-00223076 AP-00223077 AP-00223078 AP-00223079 AP-00223079 AP-00223081 AP-00223081 AP 00223081 AP 00223081 AP 00223081 AP 00223081 AP 00223081 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223082 AP 00223083 AP 00223083 AP 00223085 AP-00223089 AP-00223091 AP-00223092 AP-00223093 AP-00223094 AP-00223095 AP-00223096 AP-00223097 AP-00223098 AP-00223099 AP-00223100 AP-00223100 AP-00223101 AP-00223102 AP-00223103 AP-00223103 AP-00223104 AP-00223105 Check Date 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DICK, ERIC DICK, ERIC DIETERICH POST COMPANY DIETERICH POST COMPANY DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING EASTON SPORTS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIOI' EMCOR SERVICE EXPERIAN EXPERIAN FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FINESSE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATES FORD OF UPLAND INC FORD OF UPLAND INC GADABOUT TOURS INC GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A GRAYSTONE CATERING GWYNN, JOANN HAKIMI, SUSAN HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY HART'S AUTO SUPPLY HENDERSON, LARRY HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HOOPER, MARLOW HOSE MAN INC HOYT LUMBER CO., SM HOYT LUMBER CO., SM HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VAL1 HURST, CHERYL HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC IDS EQUITIES LLC IEMA Amount 32.00 34.00 674.00 2,688.00 50.00 50.00 272.48 191.53 26.89 2,038.31 672.00 650.00 50.00 50.00 11.43 9.69 17.26 16.75 13.32 13.32 17.26 720.00 720.00 960.00 653.25 780.00 868.00 675.75 680.00 840.00 868.00 840.00 882.00 213.00 116.82 3,296.40 3,000.00 800.00 77.30 415.00 324.16 296.00 255.00 93.68 76.00 19.72 -15.78 1,150.43 221.00 288.50 89.22 275.29 3,678.00 25.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time:f ~15:24:5 Check No. AP-00223105 AP-00223105 AP-00223106 AP-00223107 AP-00223110 AP-00223111 AP-00223112 AP-00223113 AP-00223113 AP-00223113 AP-00223113 AP-00223114 AP-00223115 AP-00223116 AP-00223117 AP-00223118 AP-00223120 AP-00223122 AP-00223124 AP-00223126 AP-00223127 AP-00223129 AP-00223130 AP-00223131 AP-00223132 AP-00223133 AP-00223134 AP-00223135 AP-00223136 AP-00223137 AP-00223137 AP-00223137 AP-00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP 00223138 AP-00223138 AP-00223139 AP-00223140 AP-00223141 AP-00223141 Check Date 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name IEMA IEMA IEMA INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION INNOVATIVE POLYMER SYSTEMS INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION ISEC INCORPORATED ISEC INCORPORATED ISEC INCORPORATED ISEC INCORPORATED J FLETCHER CREAMER AND SONS INC JONES, BOB JRC HOUSING INC KB HOMES GREATER LOS ANGELES INC KHAHN CONSTRUCITON LAM, JACK LEWIS AND LEWIS LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS M & M COURT REPORTERS INC MCLEAN, KIRSTEN MIDWEST TAPE N M A DUES C/O DAVID MCDONALD NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION COUNCIL NATIONAL DEFERRED NATIONAL EVENT SERVICES NATIONS RENT NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIF© OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT ONTARIO W1NNELSON CO ORACLE CORP ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE Amount 25.00 25.00 25.00 557.00 27.50 5,000.00 82.43 -54.19 443.48 541.94 -44.34 1,000.00 2,560.00 877.50 4,800.00 495.94 200.00 7.67 3,965.00 318.00 34.00 322.82 5.54 466.65 89.88 26,863.31 671.33 10.78 432.00 59.29 199.55 217.14 113.85 -117.59 113.60 -10.56 9.78 401.17 79.40 4.54 74.32 62.21 172.04 57.68 6.51 151.99 315.7l 115.13 80.61 38.49 238.13 3,300.00 -33.92 33.92 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 16 Report:CK_AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC ~ CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Tim7 6 15:24:5 CheckNo. AP-00223141 AP-00223141 AP-00223141 AP-00223142 AP-00223148 AP-00223149 AP-00223149 AP-00223149 AP-00223150 AP-00223152 AP-00223153 AP-00223154 AP-00223154 AP-00223154 AP-00223154 AP-00223154 AP-00223154 AP-00223154 AP 00223154 AP 00223156 AP 00223157 AP 00223158 AP 00223160 AP 00223162 AP 00223164 AP 00223165 AP 00223165 AP 00223165 AP 00223165 AP 00223167 AP 00223168 AP 00223169 AP 00223169 AP 00223170 AP 00223171 AP 00223172 AP 00223172 AP 00223173 AP 00223175 AP 00223175 AP 00223175 AP 00223175 AP 00223175 AP 00223175 AP 00223175 AP 00223175 AP 00223175 AP 00223176 AP 00223177 AP 00223178 AP 00223178 AP-00223178 AP-00223178 AP-00223179 Check Date 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA PERFORMANCE AUTO BODY PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS PMI POMONA PRINT STOP PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES 1NC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC PRIZIO CONSTRUCTION INC QUINNEY, MONIQUE QU[NTANA, ZITA RAMIREZ, JOHNNY RANCHO OAKS LLC RAVELERS REINHARDTSEN, DEBRA REPUBLIC ELECTRIC REPUBLIC ELECTRIC REPUBLIC ELECTRIC REPUBLIC ELECTRIC RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON RIVERA, LUCY RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT RIVERSIDE CO DEPT CHILD SUPPORT SADIE CONSTRUCTION [NC SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS SAN BERNARD[NO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMEN' SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTRI SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( SAN BERNARD[NO COUNTY OFFICE OF ASSES~ SAN BERNARD[NO CTY CHILD SUPPORT PAYM SAN BERNARD[NO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARD[NO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARD[NO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT SAN BERNARD[NO, CITY OF Amount 15.44 18.61 43.21 54,517.05 594.09 391.25 393.68 381.14 1,030.28 85.01 143.01 -585.82 5,858.15 -43.35 433.53 -3,579.33 35,793.28 -2,356.74 23,567.33 110.00 193.00 250.00 15,000.00 400.00 282.50 5,924.53 1,146.90 705.00 6,272.04 232.92 40.00 33.94 101.82 250.00 5,793.00 397.73 276.64 7,139.95 495.00 660.00 318.00 318.00 424.00 318.00 424.00 318.00 495.00 1,648:86 213.50 1,330,355.98 780.35 5,844.00 23,426.67 600.00 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: ! 7 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Xim~ 7 15:24:5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00223180 5/18/2005 AP - 00223181 5/18/2005 AP - 00223182 5/18/2005 AP - 00223185 5/18/2005 AP - 00223185 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP- 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP- 00223189 5/t8/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 AP - 00223189 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name SBC LONG DISTANCE SCOTT, DIANA SCRIPPS CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE HEALTH SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN 5/18/2005 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.76 250.00 1,382.00 358.97 286.76 14.99 7,466.70 13.82 13.82 15.31 14.31 14.35 51.27 8,060.40 58.91 1,060.02 14.40 13.07 13.90 14.37 14.08 13.90 13.40 52.34 14.11 13.93 13.90 13.84 14.39 92.02 14.37 14.59 13.96 13.40 13.40 15.03 15.77 14.37 15.06 13.87 13.72 1,098.41 19.52 13.93 96.79 13.93 97.36 46.96 132.13 88.23 136.70 6.98 93.05 103.96 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 18 Report:CKAGENDA REG PORTRAIT RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Timel g 15:24:5 CheckNo. AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP 00223189 AP 00223189 AP 00223189 AP 00223189 AP 00223189 AP 00223189 AP 00223189 AP 00223189 AP 00223189 AP 00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 AP-00223189 Check Date 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Amount 79.29 108.98 115.96 67.68 100.81 65.15 115.57 86.91 23.29 25.88 13.90 14.96 43.48 14.96 14.96 21.68 23.56 14.50 5T27 14.71 48.26 41.78 14.35 56.21 13.90 13.90 13.90 14.35 59.00 21.51 15.06 14.00 13.90 44.59 37.12 34.26 13.87 488.02 22.57 14.35 577.67 50.46 14.11 13.40 13.85 19.28 20.33 33.71 40.73 55.85 16.68 14.40 103.65 62.66 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 19 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Timer q' 15:24:5 Check No. Check Date AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/t8/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223189 5/18/2005 AP - 00223190 5/18/2005 AP - 00223191 5/18/2005 AP - 00223192 5/18/2005 AP - 00223194 5/18/2005 AP - 00223194 5/18/2005 AP - 00223195 5/18/2005 AP - 00223195 5/18/2005 AP - 00223196 5/18/2005 AP - 00223196 5/18/2005 AP - 00223196 5/18/2005 AP - 00223196 5/18/2005 AP - 00223197 5/18/2005 AP - 00223200 5/18/2005 AP ~ 00223201 5/18/2005 AP - 00223203 5/18/2005 AP - 00223204 5/18/2005 AP - 00223205 5/18/2005 AP - 00223206 5/18/2005 AP - 00223206 5/18/2005 AP - 00223206 5/18/2005 AP - 00223206 5/18/2005 AP - 00223206 5/18/2005 AP - 00223206 5/18/2005 AP - 00223206 5/t8/2005 AP - 00223206 5/18/2005 AP - 00223206 5/18/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SOUTHWEST SPECTRA LLC STOFA, JOSEPH TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY, O C TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL 1NC TEMECULA MECHANICAL INC TEMECULA MECHANICAL 1NC TEMPLE, LARRY THEWES, KRIST1NE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS INC UNITED WAY VALLEY CREST NURSERY VEND U CO VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON VERIZON Amount 9.02 14.74 53.99 13.93 13.93 13.93 13.93 28.71 16.03 13.93 14.26 13.40 13.40 13.87 143.24 68.76 74.74 217.12 40.32 132.08 99.83 58.91 48.22 17.92 20.41 16.43 43.90 34.46 1,192.41 170.75 15.00 203.27 291.69 24.29 t85.58 -836.46 8,364.59 -734.46 7,344.67 45.86 525.00 4,202.04 554.32 1,941.66 169.35 43.39 37.22 0.04 29.37 59.78 85.35 27.82 29.37 20.40 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTKAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time2 0 15:24:5 Check No. AP- 00223206 AP-00223206 AP-00223207 AP-00223207 AP-00223208 AP-00223209 AP-00223211 AP-00223212 AP-00223212 AP-00223212 AP-00223212 AP-00223212 AP-00223212 AP-00223212 AP-00223212 AP-00223213 AP-00223213 AP-00223214 AP-00223215 AP- 00223216 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 AP 00223217 Check Date 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/18/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 5/19/2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Agenda Check Register 5/11/2005 through 5/24/2005 Vendor Name VEKIZON VERIZON VIDEO GUYS, THE VIDEO GUYS, THE VIGILANCE, TERRENCE VOLM, LIZA WARD, DESIREE WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WE DO EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND SUPPLY INC WE DO EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND SUPPLY INC WHITE CAP CONST SUPPLY WILBERTON, DENISE WINSTAR DEVELOPMENT LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES 1NC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. LOWE'S COMPANIES INC. Total for Check ID AP: Total for Entity: Amount 2.21 52.63 150.00 203.88 580.00 112.50 452.50 134.69 4,464.21 86.29 794.55 56.78 468.41 84.00 466.77 198.97 257.22 422.79 264.00 500.00 48.39 102.37 164.77 12.85 363.12 106.50 64.55 195.69 480.64 53.77 32.26 4.63 4,059,395.84 4,059,395.84 User: VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Report:CK_AGENDAREG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: 05/25/200 Time2 / 15:24:5 T H E C I T Y 0 F I~A N C ii 0 C U CA ~l 0 N C, A DATE: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO PURCHASE A HP DESIGN JET 5550PS 60 INCH PLOTTER FROM AMERICOMP INFOSYSTEMS UTILIZING A WESTERN STATES CONTRACTING ALLIANCE CONTRACT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $18,550., AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $18,550. FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5605 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the purchase of a HP DesignJet 5550ps 60 inch plotter from Americorp Infosystems for the total amount of $18,550.00 and authorization to appropriate $18,550.00 from the Equipment Replacement Fund into Account No. 1714001-5605 for the purchase. BACKGROUND The current plotter in the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Division is for citywide use. This plotter was purchased in 1998 and has produced approximately 600 plots/maps annually. Hewlett Packard (HP) handles maintenance; however, HP will discontinue maintenance on the plotter at the end of the current contract because of the age of the plotter and the increased number of maintenance calls. All future maintenance calls will be charged on a time and materials basis. This arrangement would not be fiscally prudent for the City as it was determined that the City could easily expend the total cost of the replacement plotter in approximately 2 to 3 years on maintenance charges, down time and outsourcing cost during the down time. Purchasing requested and received 5 competitive bids for this plotter. The selection of the vendor was based on Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA) pricing. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 01,2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael Ten Eyck, Administrative Resource Manager Approve and authorize a change order in the amount of $30,0000 with Butsko Utility Design Inc. for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded from 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council authorize a change order in the amount of $30,0000 with Butsko Utility Design Inc. for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded from 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. A critical element of the City's plans to serve this area was the construction of an electrical distribution system to relay energy from the City's substation and interconnection with Southern California Edison's transmission system, located at the southeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Stadium Parkway, to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan area. The City's electrical distribution has been completed and is currently supply energy to the Victoria Garden Regional Shopping Center. With the electrical distribution currently providing energy to the Victoria Arbors Master plan Area; City is in the process of developing load management reports to provide that the energy needs of these developments are adequately balanced. In addition, new development within the Victoria Garden Regional Shopping Center requires plan checking and inspections services on part of Butsko Utility Design to ensure the services voltage requirements of the new stores are being met. CitY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF A CHANGE ORDER WITH BUTSKO UtilITY DESIGN, lNg. FOR VARIOUS SERVICES RELATED TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY JUNE 01, 2005 PAGE 2 Staff identified specialized construction inspection and project management services that will be required during the construction phase of these projects and solicited proposals from Butsko Utility Design, Inc., the designer of the municipal utility distribution system, for such services. The services identified in the proposals represent an expanded scope of work associated with the design services previously rendered. As the designer of the distribution system, Butsko is uniquely qualified to provide inspection and project management services for these vitally important and time-sensitive projects. It is recommended the City Council authorize a change order in the amount of $30,0000 with Butsko Utility Design Inc. for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area to be funded from 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:MT r HE CITY OF ]~ANCHO CUCAMONGA DA'r~: FROM: June 1, 2005 Mayor, Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Gary Varney, Streets, and Fleet & Storm Drains Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT:: APPROVAL FOR THE SINGLE SOURCE REPLACEMENT PURCHASE OF ONE LEEBOY 7000 ASPHALT PAVER FROM NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT CO. OF SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $67,343.75 AND THE REPLACEMENT PURCHASE OF A ZIEMAN MODEL 2650 PAVER SPECIAL TRAILER FROM SCOTT EQUIPMENT OF FONTANA, CALIFORNIA IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,046.80 FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1172001-5603 (EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND) APPROVED IN THE 2004-2005 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the single source replacement purchase of one LeeBoy 7000 Asphalt Paver from Nixon-Egli Equipment Co. of Santa Fe Springs, California in the amount of $67,343.75 and the replacement purchase of a Zieman Model 2650 Paver Special Trailer from Scott Equipment of Fontana, California in the amount of $11,046.80 to be funded from account 1172001-5603 (Equipment Replacement Fund) approved in the 2004-2005 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Public Works Maintenance staff reviewed specifications of many different paver boxes and made field trips to observe paver boxes with similar equipment and options in operation from different manufacturers. City staff then rented the LeeBoy 7000 Asphalt Paver Box for one week, and concluded the LeeBoy 7000 Paver Box to be the unit best suited to replace the current Asphalt Paver Box. The trailer for the LeeBoy 7000 was not determined to be a single source and three quotes were solicited and received for the Zieman Model 2650 Paver Special Trailer. Scott Equipment of Fontana, California was the lowest, most responsive, responsible bidder (bid summary attached). Therefore staff recommends the purchase of one LeeBoy 7000 Asphalt Paver from Nixon-Egli ($67,343.75) and one Zieman Model 2650 Paver Special Trailer ($11,046.80) from Scott Equipment of Fontana, California. Respectfully submitted, City Engineer BID SUMMARY FOR A ZIEMAN MODEL 2650 PAVER SPECIAL TRAILER DESCRIPTION: BIDDER #1 I BID AMOUNT BIDDER #2 BID AMOUNT BIDDER #3 BID AMOUNT Zieman 2650 Trailer-- Scott Equ~pmer~t Inland Bobcat Johnson Machinery Beavertail, Ramp Trailer, Paver Special, Taglong Deck over Wheels Subtotal $10,178.00 $10,500.00 $11,448.00 Tax $788.80 $813.75 $887.22 Shipping $80.00 $60.00 100.00 Set up Fee $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 Grand Total $11,046.80 Grand Total $11,373.75 Grand Total $12,535.22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASES $1,501 AND ABOVE The below information is provided in support of my Depadment requesting approval for a single/sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source. Vendor: Nixon-Egli Date: 6-1-05 Commodity/Service: ONE LEEBOY 7000 ASPHALT PAVER Estimated expenditure: $67,343.75 Your Name: Gary Varney Extent of market search conducted: Field review of competitive pavers & rental of paver recommended. Price Reasonableness: good Does moving forward on this product/service fudher obligate the City to future similar contractual arrangements? [~ No r-] Yes If Yes, Explain: DEFINITIONS: SINGLE SOURCE - a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from among .two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. SOLE SOURCE - A transaction with the only business entity capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. Initial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most single/sole source products/services requested). If needed, attach a memorandum containing complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry. THIS IS A SINGLE SOURCE [] THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE [] (check one). SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item no. 3 also must also be completed). 2. I-] THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum). .~q Single/Sole Source Justification Form Revised: 4/1/03 Single/Sole Source Justification Form Page 2 5. N THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. (Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application). UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique features are and what benefit the City will accrue.) THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT STANDARDIZATION (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request). NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN ATTACHED MEMORANDUM. The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the service or material described in this single/sole source justification be authorized as a single/sole source for the service or material. Department Head: Department: · · · · · · PurchasingDepa~ment * · * · · · · · · APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDiTION/$ DISAPPROVE Comments: $1,501 - $19,999 APPROVED BY PURCHASING MANAGER: $20,000 AND ABOVE See comments above by Purchasing Division Attach to Council Request CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Date: Date: C:\WJNNl~Tcmporary Inlcmct Files\OLKEBF~aver Box Single Source Justification form 6-1-05.doc ~ ~ 4/1/2003 T H E C I T Y O F {~ANCHO CUCAHONGA Staff Report DATE: June 1, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer James T. Harris, Associate Engineer, Project Manag~ APPROVE THE SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF ,~ REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER ASSEMBLY FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND FAIRMONT DRIVE FROM ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT $28,865.14 TO BE FUNDED FROM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS, ACCOUNT 11703035300 (CONTRACT SERVICES), AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL $29,000.00 FROM 170 (GAS TAX 2105/PROP 111) FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO. 11703035300 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the single source purchase of a replacement traffic signal controller assembly for the traffic signals at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Fairmont Drive from Econolite Control Products, Inc. in the amount $28,865.14 to be funded from Capital Improvement Funds, Account 11703035300 (Contract Services), and appropriate an additional $29,000.00 from 170 (Gas Tax 2105/Prop 111) fund balance to Account No. 11703035300. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The existing traffic signal controller assembly at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Fairmont Drive was hit and damaged beyond repair in an automobile collision and must be replaced. A controller assembly is the cabinet located on one corner of a signalized intersection with a controller unit that provides for the timing and operation of the traffic signals in conjunction with other equipment such as battery back up and emergency vehicle preemption systems. This cabinet was temporarily replaced with a spare cabinet; however, the spare cabinet cannot work with the master signal system along Base Line Road of which several of the signals along Milliken Avenue (including the new Central Park signals) have been designed to work with. Traffic signal control in the City of Rancho Cucamonga has traditionally been accomplished with equipment from two manufacturers, 'Econolite' from Econolite Control Products, Inc. of Anaheim, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: ReplacementofTraffic Signal Controller Assembly forlntersection of Milliken and Fairmont Drive June 1, 2005 Page 2 California and 'Traconex' from U.S. Traffic Corporation, a Quixote company of Santa Fe Springs, California. The damaged controller assembly was Traconex equipment. However, the control equipment for the traffic signals for Central Park just south of Fairmont Drive on Milliken Avenue and the Base Line Road Coordination project are Econolite and will be coordinated using the Econolite Aries Traffic Management System. Also, for standardization of equipment, parts and maintenance and to allow coordination along Milliken Avenue, the Central Park traffic signal on Milliken was designed to be coordinated with the signals along Base Line Road and at Fairmont Drive. Over the years equipment prices have risen with only the Econolite brand remaining a viable, supported and improving product line. The Traconex product line has not been improved for several years and support is spotty at best. The Traconet coordination system is not compatible with the Aries system nor is it operational anywhere in the City. To be part of and compatible with the Econolite Aries Traffic Management System along Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, the replacement assembly must be purchased from Econolite Control Products, Inc. Econolite has been determined to be the single source for traffic signal controller assemblies for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. See the attached Single Source Justification Form and Memorandum to the City Purchasing Manager that has been investigated and approved. When the completed controller assembly is delivered to the City, the City's Signal and Lighting Coordinator will install it with the aid of the City's traffic signal maintenance contractor. The driver involved in the collision or their insurance company will be required to reimburse all funds expended by the City for the subject assembly replacement. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachment: Single Source Justification Form and Memorandum CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASES $1,501 AND ABOVE The information below is provided in support of my Department requesting approval for a single/sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source. VENDOR: [ Econolite Control Products, inc. [ DATE: ] 05/09/05 COMMODITY/SERVICE: [ Replacement traffic signal cabinet assembly for Milliken/Fairmont traffic signals ESTIIVlATED EXPENDITURE: [ $28,865.14 ] YOUR NAME: [James T. 'Harris EXTENT OF MARKET Other California agencies, Econolite is sole provider for the desired equipment SEARCH CONDUCTED: PRICE REASONABLENESS: [ good Does moving forward on this product/service further obligate the City to future similar contract actual arrangements? DEFINITIONS: SINGLE SOURCE - a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. SOLE SOURCE - a transaction with the ONLY business entity capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. Initiat all entries be[ow that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most single/sole source products/services requested). Attach a memorandum containing complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry. Check One: [] THIS IS A SINGLE SOURCE [] THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE 1. [] REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item No. 3 must also be completed) 2. [] THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum) 3. [] THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. (Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application) 4. [] UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique features are and what benefit the City will accrue) 5. [] THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT STANDARDIZATION. (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request) 6. [] NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN All-ACHED MEMORANDUM. 31 The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the service or material described in this single/sole source justification be authorized as a single/sole source of the service or material * * * * * PURCHASTNG DEPARTMENT [~APPROVED [] APPROVED WITH CONDITION/S [] DISAPPROVED COMMENTS:I $1,501 - $19,999 $20,000 AND ABOVE See comments above by Purchasing Division Attach to Council Request CITY COUNCIL ACTION: J DATE: J RAN H O C U C A M O N G A NGINEERING DEPARTMENT SbffReport DATE: June 1, 2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AiCP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ../3 Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil EngineerF/¢/ APPROVAL OF AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $140,000 FROM MEASURE I FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO. 11763035650 FOR THE EAST AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS IN COOPERATION WITH THE CITY OF FONTANA RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve an appropriation in the amount of $140,000 from Measure I fund balance to Account No. 11763035650 for the East Avenue and Base Line Road Improvements in cooperation with the City of Fontana, and authorize the City Engineer to sign the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and City of Fontana. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City of Fontana contacted the City in the desire to cooperate and jointly participate in a project to construct street improvements on East Avenue from Base Line Road to the northerly 400 feet and Base Line Road from East Avenue to the easterly 700 feet within the City limits of both Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana. Fontana is designated as the lead Agency to coordinate and construct the street improvements. The City will reimburse Fontana for their fair share of the construction and construction administration costs estimated at $140,000, with the City and Fontana extending whatever services are necessary to one another for permits, inspections and support to complete the project in an expeditious manner. Respectf~Jl!,y submitted,. William Z~ O Nell City Engineer AVE PROJECT LOCATION VtClNITY MAP NO SCALE R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Staff Report DATE: TO: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael TenEyck, Administrative Resources Manager~'( Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician :~ ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $278,100.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, POUK & STEINLE, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $27,810.00 FOR THE MARKETPLACE PROPERTIES AND VICTORIA GARDENS SOUTHERN PARCEL 12 KV ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION AND ONSITE SYSTEM CABLING, CONNECTIONS, EQUIPMENT PROJECT, TO BE FUNDED FROM MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 17053035650/1485705-0 AND ACCOUNT NO. 17053035650/1487705-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $7,000.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 17053035650/1485705-0 FROM MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND BALANCE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $278,100.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Pouk & Steinle, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $27,810.00, for the Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel 12 KV Electrical Distribution and Onsite System Cabling, Connections, Equipment Project, to be funded from Municipal Utility funds, Account No. 17053035650/1485705-0 and Account No. 17053035650/1487705-0 and appropriate an additional amount of $7,000.00 to Account No. 17053035650/1485705-0 from Municipal Utility fund balance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 10, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $325,231.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements, of the bid documents. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Award 12 KV Electrical Distribution and Onsite System Cabling, Connections, Equipment Project June 1, 2005 Page 2 The construction of this project consists constructing a complete electrical distribution system including trenching, conduit installation, cabling, equipment, and surface restoration. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction. Resp,~ly submitted, City Engineer WJO:MT/RO:Is Attachment 3/,' BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 10, 2005 APPARENT LOW BIDDER Marketplace Properties and Victoria Gardens Southern Parcel 12 KV ENGINEERS COST Electrical Distribution and Onsite System Cabling, Connections, ESTIMATE Pouk & Steinle, Inc. Equipment Project UNIT ] UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT Victoria Gardens - South Parcel 1. 90 EA #2 Load Break Elbow, 15 KV $248.00 $22,320.00 2. 6 EA 4 Way J-Bar, 15 KV [ $627.50 $3,765.00 3. 1 EA Pad-Mid Transf. Switch/Fuse 277/480 Volt, 3 Pha, 500 KVA, 12 I $11,610.00 $11,610.00 4. 1 EA Pad-Mid Transl. Switch/Fuse 277/480 Volt, 3 Pha, 300 KVA, 12 I $9,184.001 $9,184.00 5. 1 EA ?ad-Mid Transfi Swilch/Fuse 120/208 Volt, 3 Pha, 225 KVA, 12 $8,390.001 $8,390.00 6. 7 EA ?ad-Mid Transf. Switch/Fuse 120/208 Volt, 3 Pha, 150 KVA, 12 $7,755.00 $54,285.00 7. 1 EA 75 KVA, 120/208V [ $6,736.00 $6,736.0C 8. 3 EA !00 AMP Dead Break Str. Splice, 15 KV [ $405.00 $1,215.0(] 9. 11 EA 3rounding/Racking and Miscellaneous Material j $625.001 $6,875.0(] 10. 1900 FT 3/c #2 XLP, 15 KV, 220 MIL Jackeled I $7.80[ $14,820.00 I 1. 2600 FT Service Conductor (4/C 3-350 & 1-4/O AL-CLP, 600V) ] $8.00 $20,800.00 SUBTOTAL {VICTORIA GARDENS) $198,593.50 $160,000.00 Da)' Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road Retail [ ] -- L EA PME9 I $18,868.00 $18,868.00 2. 3 EA #10o0 KCMIL 600 AMP Tee w/Test Point, 15 KV [ $620.00 $1,860.00 3. 3 EA T's for 600 AMP PME, 15 KV I' $620.001 $1,860.00 4. 3 EA #1000 KCMIL 600 AMP Tee w/200 AMP Elbow Bushing, 15 I $725.00 $2,175.00 5. 3 EA #2 Dead Break Elbow, 15 KV I $300.00i $900.00 6. 36 EA #2 Load Break Elbow, 15 KV I $248.001 $8,928.00 7. 6 EA 200 AMP Insulating Receptacle, 15 KV I $180.001 $1,080.00 8. 9 EA 4 Way J-Bar, 15 KV (Load Break) I $627.50 $5,647.50i 9. 3 EA Way J~Bar, 15 KV I $621.50 $1,864.5CI 10. I EA Pad-Mtd Trans£ Switch/Fuse 120/208 Volt, 3 Pha, 500 KVA, 12 I $11,222.00[ $11,222.0(] I 1. 3 EA Pad-Mid Transf. Switch/Fuse 120/208 Volt, 3 Pha, 150 KVA, 12 I $7,755.001 $23,265.0(] 12. 6 EA Fuse 140 AMP XL/CL ] $265.00 $1,590.00 13. 5 EA 3rounding/Racking and Miscellaneous Material ! $625.00 $3,125.00 14. 280C FT 3/C #2 XLP, 15 KV, 220 MIL Jacketed J $7.801 $21,840.00 15. 35C FT Service Conductor (4/C 3-700 & I-4/O AL-CLP, 600V) [ $14.501 $5,075.00 16~ 110O FT Servicc Conductor (4/C #350 & 1-4/O AL-CLP, 600V) [ $8.00 $8,800.00 SUBTOTAL (DAY CREEK/BASE LINE) I $126,637.50 $118,100.00 G" DTOT.*L1$325,231.00 1$278,,00.00 ~,ANYAN ~)Trt ~T G'I'U 5T ONTARI( F'I~OJECT LOCATION BN~PP, P.. LIMIT RANCHO CUCAMONGA S Re or June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, Cit7 Engineer. Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Richard Oaxaca, Engineering Technician ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $119,762.00 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, FLEMING ENVIRONMENTAL tNC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,976.20 FOR THE LAKE PUMP EQUIPMENT VAULT AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK, TO BE FUNDED FROM PD 85 FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 18483035650/1224848-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $119,762.00 to the apparent Iow bidder, Fleming Environmental Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $11,976.20, for the Lake Pump Equipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park, to be funded from PD 85 funds, Account No. 18483035650/1224848-0. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 10, 2005, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $121,510.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of lhe bid documents. This project will retrofit the existing underground vault currently used to house the lake filtration equipment at Red Hill Community Park. The contract documents call for forty-five (45) working days to complete this construction. Res,o~;~lly submitted, VVilJiao~' J. O'Neil City Engineer BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 10, 2005 Apparent Low Bidder ENGINEERS COST Lake Pump Eqipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park ESTIMATE Fleming Environmental Inc. Braughton Construction, Inc. UNITi UNIT I UNITI NOQTYUNIT.ESC PTION COST MOUNT COST I, OUNT COST I 1. i LS Construct Equipment Vault / Boat House per $139,457.00I Improvement Plans $121,510.00 $121,510.00 $119,762.00 $119,762.00 $139,457.00 TOTAL $121,510.00 $119,762.00 $139,457.00 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 10, 2005 Lake Pump Eqipment Vault at Red Hill Community Park 4-Con Engineering, Inc. DELT Builders, Inc. UNITI UNITI NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1. LS Construct Equipment Vault / Boat House per Improvement Plans $156,495.00 $156,495.00 $164,121.00 $164, i21.00 TOTAL $156,495.00 $164,121.00 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ]~NGIN E I~I~IN G DE DAI~T~ ENT StaffRewrt DATE: TO: BY: June 1,2005 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NO. 14759-1 LOCATED AT WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD AND WILSON AVENUE SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES - APN: 226-102-17 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract No. 14759- 1, order the maintenance annexations and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said resolution BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract 14759, located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue was approved by the City Planning Commission on November 10, 1999 with the approval of Resolution No. 99-11 for the development of 358 single-family homes and 3 lettered lots for common open space/parks totaling 18.3 acres on 132 acres of land. Pulte Homes, Developer, is submitting the first phase for approval that includes 95 single-family homes and I lettered lot for City Park. The first phase will include the re-alignment of Banyan Street from the existing diagonal Summit/Banyan Street between East Avenue and Wardman BuJlock Road. The Developer, Pulte Homes previously submitted an agreement and security on November 3, 2004 to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements. Respectfully submitted, · O Nell City Engineer WJO:js Attachments CITY OF RANCI IO CUCAMONG,~ ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP A title; 7-R ~q-7~?-!, RESOLUTION NO. O ~" I ~/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TRACT MAP NUMBER 14759-1 WHEREAS, Tract 14759-1 submitted by Pulte Homes consisting of 95 single family lots and I-lettered lot for a City Park located at Wardman Bullock Road and Wilson Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the development of 358 single family lots on November 10, 1999 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by the entry into an Improvement Agreement on November 3, 2004 with Pulte Homes, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Tract Map 14759-1 offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that with said Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security previously submitted by said developer and approved and signed by the Mayor, then said Tract Map 14759-1 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUt,O, "O. 0 5'- I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 FOR TRACT MAP 14759-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the 'q'errito~') be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XlIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have RESOLUTION NO. TRACT MAP 14759-1 - PULTE HOMES June 1,2005 Page 2 declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assbssment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each pamel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: Ail future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A To Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: PULTE HOMES The legal description of the Properties are: Being a subdivision of a portion of Lots "A" and "B" .of Tract 2428, Official Records of San Bemardino County. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1 )) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. B-1 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: TR 14759-1 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLMD # 1 --- 23 SLMD # 7 67 --- Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Landscaping DGSF SF SF Trees EA LMD # 7 321 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel D.U, Sl S7 L7 B-2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $307.05 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1572 1.00 1572 $307.05 $482,882.60 Comm/Ind. Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $3,070.50 TOTAL $485,753.10 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14759-1 ) is: 95 Pamels x I A.U. Factor x $307.05 Rate Per A.U. = $29,169.75 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit TvDe Units Units Factor Units Unit Single Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 Family Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 Revenue $375,853.27 $17.77 $151,755.80 Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14759-1) is: 95 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate PerA.U. = $1,688.15 Annual Assessment C-1 TR 14759-1 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1804 1.00 1804 $33.32 $60,109.28 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.20 TOTAL $60,442.48 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 14759-1 ) is: 95 Parcels x I A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $3,165.50 Annual Assessment C-2 TR 14759-1 R A N CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: June 1,2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 16461, LOCATED ON IOAMOSA STREET, WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE SUBMITTED BY PATRIClA PRUTTING, DELBERT AND JUDY FELTIS AND JAMES AND BERNICE DUNN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract Map 16461, accepting the subject agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. I and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map 16461, located on laomosa Street, west of Hellman Avenue, in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), was approved by the PJanning Commission on December 10, 2003. This project is for a subdivision of six (6) single-family lots on 3.1 acres of land. The Developers, Patricia Prutting, Delbert and Judy Feltis and James and Bernice Dunn, are submitting and agreement, securities and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Public Improvements Faithful Performance Bond $20,300.00 Labor and Material Bond $10,150.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $2,800.00 City Council Staff Report TRACT 16461 - Patricia Prutting, Delbert and Judy Feltis and James and Bernice Dunn June 1,2005 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga Valley Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer W JO:wv Attachment $$ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DMSION N ITEM: ~ TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP NO. 16461, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 16461, submitted by Patricia Prutting, Delbert and Judy Feltis, James and Bernice Dunn, and consisting of a subdivision of 3.1 acres of land into six (6) parcels, located on Ioamosa Street, west of Hellman Avenue, in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on December 10, 2003; and WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 16461 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Patricia Prutting, Delbert and Judy Feltis, and James and Bernice Dunn, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Tract Map No. 16461 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION (~ 5"' / ~ 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT MAP 16461 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said Landscape Maintenance District 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amount snot to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. bo The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determine in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. 2 TR 16461 ~7 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owners of the Property are: Patricia Prutting, Delbert and Judy Feltis, and James and Bernice Dunn The legal description of the Property is: PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL MAP 5692, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN BOOK 192, PAGES 9 AND 10, OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessors Parcel No's: 1061-611-11-0-000 and 1061-611-12-0-000 The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-I TR 16461 ~,I~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ! AND 2 , ~ ~ ,,~. , ~ ~ - ~ · PM 15692 ' 'l ~3.938 SQ FT', ', -?0.640.~Q FT., ~f8 FT '' ~ ~-~- ~ PM 15692 ~2a,Y34 SQ ~T VACA ---- ~M '2756, PMB 25/24-25 BANYAN HILLSIDE ROAD STREET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CA I.IFC~D NI,a NORTH Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. This sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. B-1 TR 16461 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: TR 16461 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD #1 --o SLD #2 3 Landscaping Community Trail DGSF Turf SF Non-Turf SF Trees EA LMD # I *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S 1 6 6 6 S2 6 L1 6 B-2 TR 16461 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (GENERAL CITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): # of Physical # of Rate Per Units Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 757 1.0 7951 $92.21 $733,161.71 Multi-Family Units 7091 0.5 3570 $92.21 $329,189.70 Corem/Ind. Acre 2 1.0 2 $92.21 $184.42 TOTAL $1,062,535.63 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16461) is: 6 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $92.21 Rate Per A.U. -- $553.26 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,1.51 $17.77 $375,853.27 Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16461 ) is: 6 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate PerA.U. = $106.62 Annual Assessment C-I TR 16461 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 6050 1.00 6050 $39.97 $241,818.50 Multi Family Unit 24 1.00 919 $39.97 $36,732.43 Commercial Acre 19.05 2.00 19.05 $39.97 $1,522.86 Total $280,073.79 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (TR 16461) is: 6 Parcels x 1 A.U. Factor x $39.97 Rate Per A.U. = $239.82 Annual Assessment C-2 [~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DE PAR~f ~ENT SIN/Report DALE: TO: FROM: BY: June 1,2005 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MAP, iMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, iMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16297, LOCATED AT THE CORNER EAST OF WHITE OAK AVENUE AND ELM STREET, SUBMITTED BY LOT NUMBER ONE PARTNERSHIP, LLC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 16297, accepting the subject agreement and securities, monumentation cash deposit, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 16297, located at the corner east of White Oak Avenue and Elm Street, in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), was approved by the Planning Commission on January 28, 2004. This project is for subdivision of 1.63 acres of land into three parcels. The Developer, Lot Number One Padnership, LLC, is submitting an agreement, securities, and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond Monumentation Cash Deposit $15,400.00 $7,700.00 $2,550.O0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PM 16297 - LOT NUMBER ONE PARTNERSHIP, LLC June 1,2005 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O Nell City Engineer WJO:ca Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 0 5- 1"'/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16297, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT. WHEREAS, Tentative Pamel Map 16297, submitted by Lot Number One Partnership, LLC, and consisting of a subdivision of 1.63 acres of land into three pamels, located at the corner east of White Oak Avenue and Elm Street in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on January 28, 2004; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 16297 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Lot Number One Partnership, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Parcel Map No. 16297 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION 0 ,~"' / '7 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16297 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and RESOLUTION NO. PM 16297- LOT NUMBER ONE PARTNERSHIP, LLC June 1, 2005 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the trlevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LOT NUMBER ONE PARTNERSHIP, LLC The legal description of the Property is: Real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: LOT 1 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 24, 2003, INSTRUMENT NO. 200303720290, OFFICIAL RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCELNO. A: PARCEL I OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10037, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 118 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 74 AND 75, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. TOGETHER WITH THE MOST WESTERLY 9.74 FEET OF PARCEL 2 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 10037 AND THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY 10.86 FEET OF PARCEL 9 OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 10037. DESCRIBED LOT 1 CONTAINS 1.70 ACRES MORE OR LESS AND IS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HEREWITH AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL NO. B: NON-EXCLUSIVE UNDERGROUND EASEMENTS FOR, AMONG OTHER THINGS, UTILITIES AND INCIDENTALS THERETO, AS MORE FULLY SET OUT IN THAT CERTAIN "MASTER DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS" RECORDED MAY 9, 1981, INSTRUMENT NO. 19810049396, OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL NO. C: NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR, AMONG OTHER THINGS, INGRESS, EGRESS, VEHICULAR ACCESS, DRAINAGE AND GENERAL UTILITIES, AS MORE FULLY SET OUT IN THAT CERTAIN "DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR ELM OAK OFFICE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER" RECORDED SEPTEMBER 7, 1988, INSTRUMENT NO. 19880298296, OFFICIAL RECORDS. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 PM 16297 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAl/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commemial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those pamels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAl/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commemial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. B-1 PM 16297 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project:SUBTPM 16297 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 ...... SLD # 6 --- 3 Community Trail Turf Landscaping DGSF SF Non-Tu~ SF Trees EA LMD # 3B 17 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel DU S 1 S 6 L 3B 1 0.72 1.44 0.72 0.72 2 0.52 1.04 0.52 0.52 3 0.38 0.76 0.38 0.38 B-2 PM 16297 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2004/2005.. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comrn/Ind Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 771,520.68 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16297) is: Parcel I - 0.72 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $254.02 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 - 0.52 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $183.46 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 - 0.38 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $134.06 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit TvDe Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Mufti-Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16297) is: Parcel 1 - 0.72 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $25.59 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 - 0.52 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $18.48 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 - 0.38 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $13.51 Annual Assessment C-1 PM 16297 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16297) is: Parcel 1 - 0.72 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $37.01 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 - 0.52 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $26.73 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 - 0.38 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $19.53 Annual Assessment C-2 PM 16297 StaffR port DA'rE: TO: FROM: BY: June 1,2005 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer SUBdE~I': APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16507, LOCATED ON BOTH ROCHESTER AVENUE AND BOSTON PLACE, NORTH OF JERSEY BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY LC ROCHESTER AVENUE, LLC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Pamel Map 16507, accepting the subject agreement and securities, monumentation cash deposit, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and the City Clerk to cause said map to record. ..B, AC KG R OUN D/ANALYSIS Tentative Parcel Map 16507, located on both Rochester Avenue and Boston Place, north of Jersey Boulevard, in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), was approved by the Planning Commission on September 8, 2004. This project is for subdivision of 9.57 acres of land into four parcels. The Developer, LC Rochester Avenue, LLC, is submitting an agreement, securities, and monumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond Monumentation Cash Deposit $4O,90O.O0 $2O,45O.OO $2,600.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PM 16507 - LC ROCHESTER AVENUE, LLC June 1,2005 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. R.~_¥tf u Ily submitted, City Engineer W JO:ca Attachments '/5 RESOLUTION NO. 0 ,,~'"' / '~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 16507, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 16507, submitted by LC Rochester Avenue, LLC, and consisting of a subdivision of 9.57 acres of land into four parcels, located on both Rochester Avenue and Boston Place, north of Jersey Boulevard, in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9), was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on September 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, Pamel Map No. 16507 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by LC Rochester Avenue, LLC, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and that said Parcel Map No. 16507 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 16507 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and RESOLUTION NO. PM 16507-LC ROCHESTER AVENUE, LLC June 1,2005 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hemto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the trlevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LC Rochester Avenue, LLC The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL 'A' OF THAT CERTAIN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 574 RECORDED AUGUST 18, 2004 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 599062, OFFICIAL RECORDS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 27, ACCORDING TO MAP OF ROCHESTER, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 9 OF MAPS, PAGE 20, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHERLY 15 FEET THEREOF, The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 PM 16507 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. B-1 PM 165O7 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project:SUBTPM 16507 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 --- 2 SLD # 6 ...... Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Landscaping DGSF SF SF Trees EA LMD # 3B 16 *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Pamel DU S 1 S 6 L 3B 1 2.55 5.10 2.55 2.55 2 2.02 4.04 2.02 2.02 3 1.83 3.66 1.83 1.83 4. 2.54 5.08 2.54 2.54 B-2 PM 16507 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2186.85 1.0 2186.85 $352.80 771,520.68 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16507) is: Parcel I - 2.55 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $899.64 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 - 2.02 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $712.66 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 - 1.83 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $645.82 Annual Assessment Parcel 4 - 2.54 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $896.11 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Twe Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 19,803 1.00 19,803 $17.77 $351,899.31 Multi-Family Unit 7,402 1.00 7,402 $17.77 $131,533.54 Commercial Acre 2,288.82 2.00 4,577.64 $17.77 $81,344.66 TOTAL $564,777.51 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16507) is: Parcel 1 - 2.55 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $90.63 Annual Assessment Parcel 2 - 2.02 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $71.79 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 - 1.83 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $65.04 Annual Assessment Parcel 4 - 2.54 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $90.27 Annual Assessment C-1 PM 165O7 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $51.40 for the Fiscal Year 2004/2005. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Tv[~e Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2,065.67 1.00 2,090.72 $51.40 $107,463.01 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16507) is: Parcel 1 - 2.55 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $131.07 Annual Assessment Pamel 2 - 2.02 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $103.83 Annual Assessment Parcel 3 - 1.83 Acres x I A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $ 94.06 Annual Assessment Parcel 4 - 2.54 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $51.40 Rate Per A.U. = $130.56 Annual Assessment C-2 PM 16507 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DA~: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR DRC2005-00088, LOCATED AT 12735 BANYAN STREET, LOCATED EAST OF GREENWOOD PLACE, SUBMI'I-rED BY MICHAEL HELM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement, improvement securities and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for DRC2005-00088 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2005-00088, located on 12735 Banyan Street, east of Greenwood Place, in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, is for the development of a 4934 square-foot single family residence on 1.18 acres of land. The Developer, Michael Helm, is submitting an agreement and improvement securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $20,300.00 Labor and Material Bond $10,150.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe~t[,ully submi[ted, .~ Willi,~n J. O Neil City'/Engineer W JO:wv Attachment ~CT ,LOCATION BANYAN 210 VICTORIA SUMMIT FREEWAY TO BERNARDIN0 BASELINE ROAD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION N ITEM: TITLE: RESOLUTION NO, 0 ~'" I ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2005-00088 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on June 1,2005, by Michael Helm, as Developer, for the improvement of the public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on 12735 Banyan Street, east of Greenwood Place; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. .ESO'U ,O.,O. 0 5- I § / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 7 FOR DRC2005-00088 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "72 AcF), said Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 72 Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owner of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding the such provisions of the 72 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the 'q'erritory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Propert¢' (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 72 Act and/or Article XIIID applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have RESOLUTION NO. DRC2005-00088 - Michael Helm June 1,2005 Page 2 declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenanoe Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvements. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including levy of all' assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A To Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: MICHAEL HELM The legal description of the Properties are: ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 225-171-27 THE NORTH 324 FEET OF THE EAST 168 FEET OF THE WEST ONE HALF OF LOT 2 BLOCK D, ACCORDING TO THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 2 OF MAPS PAGE 24, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. The above described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 EXHIBIT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD #7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1 )) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD #7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. B-1 Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: DRC2005-00088 (12735 Banyan Street) Street Lights SLMD # 1 1' Number of Lamps 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLMD # 7 Community Trail Turf Non-Turf Trees Landscaping DGSF SF SF EA LMD # 7 3528 --- *Existing items installed with original project Assessment Units by District Parcel D.U. S 1 1 1 1 S7 1 L7 1 B~2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $307.05 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of Assessment # of Rate Per Physical Units Factor Assessment Assessment Land Use Type Units Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1572 1.00 1572 $307.05 $482,682.60 Corem/Ind. Acre 5 2.00 10 $307.05 $3,070.50 TOTAL $485,753.10 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2005-00088) is: 1 Parcel x 1 A.U. Factor x'$307.05 Rate PerA.U. = $307.05 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Pamel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Multi-Family Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL $612,207.06 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2005-00088) is: 1 Parcel x 1 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate PerA.U. = $17.77 Annual Assessment C-1 DRC2005-00088 ?~,~ STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $33.32 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 1804 1.00 1804 $33.32 $60,109.28 Comm/Ind Acre 5 2.00 10 $33.32 $333.20 TOTAL $60,442.48 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (DRC2005-00088) is: I Parcel x 1 A.U. Factor x $33.32 Rate Per A.U. = $33.32 Annual Assessment C-2 DRC2005-00088 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffRepolt DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and membem of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT - AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, DRIVEWAY EASEMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 16237 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMI'I-FED BY B/DC PARTNERS, L.P. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt'the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 16237, accepting the subject agreements and security, ordering the maintenance annexations and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 16237, located on the southeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard was approved by the Planning Commission on July 14, 2004 for the development of a Commercial Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The Developer, B/DC PARTNERS, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, is submitting agreements and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements and joint-use driveway in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Material Bond: $340,600.00 $170,300.00 Copies of the agreements and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. R~e~pec~ully submitted, Willia~ J. O'Neil- ~ City Engineer WJO:JS:dlw ~CTORIA SUOAR GUM ST BASELIN CHURCH STREET FOOTHILL VICTORIA BLVD VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE CIT",ff OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.,t ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP title; N ~ RESOLUTION NO. 0.5"- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 16237, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, DRIVEWAY EASEMENT, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES WHEREAS, Parcel Map 16237 (Phased Parcel Map of Tentative Parcel Map No. 15716) submitted by B/DC PARTNERS, L.P. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and consisting of 8 Numbered Parcels located on the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Blvd. was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on July 14, 2004 and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map 16237 is the final map of a portion of the division of Land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map No.16237; and WHEREAS, ail of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security and a Driveway Easement with a Construction and Maintenance Agreement by B/DC PARTNERS, LP, as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon and the easements dedicated thereon for storm drain, sidewalk, street tree and landscape purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IrIEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement and said Driveway Easement with a Construction and Maintenance Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that the offers for dedication, easements and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 16237 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 3 FOR PARCEL MAP 16237 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (referred to collectively as the "Maintenance Districts"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 &the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation resolutions, an assessment engineer's report, notices of public heating and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, noiwithstanding that such provisions of the 1972 Act related to the annexation of territory to the Maintenance District, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIlD") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Maintenance Districts on the territory proposed to be annexed to such districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act to the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and have expressly consented to the armexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts; and RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP 16237 - B/DC PARTNERS, L.P. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHiP June 1, 20054 Page 2 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Ten'itory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the 1972 Act and/or Article XIIlD applicable to the authorization to the levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization of levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: The annual assessments, proposed to be, levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTIO~N 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levyofall assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: B/DC Partners, L.P., a California Limited Partnership The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL I OF PARCEL MAP NO. 15641, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. ! O0 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2003/2004 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (LMD #3B) represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees, entry monuments, the landscaping within the Metrolink Station and 22.87 acres associated with the Adult Sports Park (not including the stadium, parking lots or the maintenance building). STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (SLD #1)) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. The facilities within this district, being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such those costs associated with the maintenance and/or installation of the facilities is assigned to the City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD #3) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local street within the South Etiwanda area. B-1 IOI Exhibit "B" Continued Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2004/2005) For Project: PM 16237 Number of Lamps Street Lights 5800L 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L SLD # 1 SLD # 3 3 Landscaping Community Trail DGSF Turf SF Non-Turf SF Trees EA LMD # 3B --- *Existing items installed with original project 40 B-2 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2004/2005 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $352.80 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial/Industrial): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment 1 .and 1 l~e l Init Tyne 1 lnits 1 lnit~ Faetnr t lnit~ 1 Init Revenue Comm/Ind Acre 2115.92 1.0 2115.92 $352.80 $746,496.58 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16237) is: 9.854 Acres x 1 A.U. Factor x $352.80 Rate Per A.U. = $3,476.49 Annual Assessment STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I (ARTERIAL STREETS) The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): # of # of Rate Per Physical Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment I.and 1 lse 1 Init Tv~e 1 lnit~ 1 lnit~ Factor 1 In/tx 1 Init Revenue Single Family Parcel 21,151 1.00 21,151 $17.77 $375,853.27 Multi- Unit 8,540 1.00 8,540 $17.77 $151,755.80 Family Commercial Acre 2,380.36 2.00 4,760.72 $17.77 $84,597.99 TOTAL The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16237) is: $612,207.06 9.854 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $17.77 Rate Per A.U. = $350.21 Annual Assessment C-1 Exhibit "C" Continued STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY): The rate per assessment unit (A.U.) is $47.15 for the Fiscal Year 2004/05. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community): # of Rate Per Physical # of Physical Assessment Assessment Assessment Land Use Unit Type Units Units Factor Units Unit Revenue Single Family Parcel 5001 1.00 5001 $47.15 $235,797.15 Multi- Family Unit 124 1.00 124 $47.15 $5,846.60 Commercial Acre 47.61 2.00 95.22 $47.15 $4,489.62 TOTAL $246,133.37 The Proposed Annual Assessment against the Property (PM 16237) is: 9.854 Acres x 2 A.U. Factor x $47.15 Rate Per A.U. = $929.23 Annual Assessment C-2 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT StaffR port DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 15492, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 15492, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc. 801 Corporate Center Drive, Suite # 201 Pomona, Ca 91768 Release; Maintenance Guarantee Bond #26 68 11 $171,542.30 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment . VIOINITY MAP TR^~T 15~92 ..:::.~ CITY OF RAHCHO CUCAMONG& ~~ COUNTy OF SAN BERNARDI"O ~~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA /0.~, ~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DE PART~IE NT DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 15174, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY KB HOME GREATER LOS ANGELES INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 15174, located on the southwest corner of Church Street and Rochester Avenue, submitted by KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc, BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER KB Home Greater Los Angeles Inc. 801 Corporate Central Drive, Suite # 201 Pomona, Ca 91768-2641 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #11127489364 $190,730.00 Respectfully submitted, William 0. O'Neil Oity En§ineer WJO:tch Attachment VICINITY MAP , ~ BASE LINE ROAD VIE'W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DAIE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TR 15902, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BANYAN STREET, SUBMITTED BY US HOME CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for TR 15902, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Banyan Street, submitted by US Home Corporation BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER US Home Corporation 391 N. Main Street, Ste. # 300 Corona, Ca 92880 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #929 240 005 $22,070.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVIS ION BOUNDARY OF ANNEXATION NORTH fl NTS ITEM: Tract ]~[0~. TITLE: Rancho Etiwanda EXHIBIT: Vicinity M_att' i /g> .. C H 0 CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: BY: SUBJECT: June 1,2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR PARCEL MAP 16042, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND CENTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PARK PLACE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Parcel Map 16042, located at the southwest corner of 8th Street and Center Avenue, submitted by Park Place Rancho Cucamonga, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Park Place Rancho Cucamonga, LLC 3685 Main Street, Suite 220 Riverside, Ca 92501 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #208 23 50-M $546,500.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment ARROW ROUTE ~ 5TH S~EET 4TH STREET LOCATION STREET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N ENGINEERING DIVISION R ^ N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: June 1,2005 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16398, LOCATED AT TIlE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND 7TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY W.F. CONSTRUCTION, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16398, located at the northwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 7th Street, submitted by W.F. Construction, Inc. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER W.F. Construction, Inc. 635 West Allen Avenue San Dimas, Ca 91773 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #828138S $31,900.00 Respectfully submitted, Willi~n J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:tch Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMONGA ENClIN~,~G DIVISION 'X~,~'~ V/C. III1T~' PtA/=' //,/ I~ A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING D E PART~IE NT StaffRepor DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1,2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Tasha Hunter, Public Svc. Tech I RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND RETAINED AS MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16189, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, SOUTH OF VICTORIA STREET, SUBMITTED BY APHRCK, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond retained as Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16189, located on the east side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street, submitted by APHRCK, LLC BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended, and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER APHRCK, LLC 4959 Palo Verde Street, Suite B-110 Montclair, Ca 91763 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Maintenance Guarantee Bond) #B34217525 $1,221,200.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Nei~ WJO:tch Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA KNGIN~.RPJNG DIVISION N StaffRe rt DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1,2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Jon Gillespie, Traffic Engineer CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS RECOMMENDATION: Approve staff's recommendation to amend Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code in order to establish prima facie speed limits at various locations. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a rapidly growing City, and over the last several years, we have constructed several new street segments. In order for the City's Police Department to enforce the posted speed limits with radar, an Engineering and Traffic Survey must first be performed to determine the 85th percentile speed of the street. Then, the City Council must approve an ordinance to amend Section 10.20.020 of the City's Municipal Code to establish the recommended prima facie speed limits. City staff has conducted Engineering and Traffic Surveys in accordance with the California Vehicle Code requirements for each new street segments, and is recommending the adoption of the following prima facie speed limits: Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie Name of Street and Limits Speed Limit (mph) Speed Limit (mph) 1. Banyan Street, Rochester Avenue to Day Creek 2. Banyan Street, Day Creek Blvd. to Etiwanda Avenue Not Posted 45 Not Posted 40 Page2 June1,2005 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS Name of Street and Limits Existing Posted Proposed Prima Facie Speed Limit (mph) Speed Limit (mph) 3. Church Street, Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard 4. Church Street, Day Creek Blvd. to Victoria Park Lane 5. Church Street, Victoria Park Lane to Etiwanda Avenue 6. Day Creek Blvd., Foothill Blvd. to Church Street 7. Day Creek Blvd., Church Street to Base Line Road 8. Day Creek Blvd., 1-210 Freeway to Banyan Street 9. Day Creek Blvd., Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue 10. Ellena West, Base Line Road to Base Line Road 11. Miller Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue 12. Milliken Avenue, Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue 13.Victoria Gardens Lane, Day Creek Blvd. to Church Street 14.Victoria Park Lane, Church Street to Base Line Road Not Posted 45 Not Posted 40 Not Posted 40 Not Posted 45 Not Posted 50 Not Posted 45 Not Posted 45 Not Posted 35 Not Posted 40 Not Posted 45 Not Posted 35 Not Posted 45 The proposed amendment to City Municipal Code Ordinance Section 10.20.020 has been reviewed and recommended for approval by the City Attorney. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer Attachment "A"- Vicinity Map Attachment "B"- Engineering and Traffic Surveys Attachment "C"- Ordinance ORD CE 5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 Provides that the City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part B of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ii), above. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declared the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: (Ord. 169 Section I (part), 1982; Ord. 39 Section 5.1, (1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 Name of Street and Limits Existing Posted Speed Limit (mph) Proposed Prima Facie Speed Limit (mph) 1. Banyan Street, Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Blvd. 2. Banyan Street, Day Creek Blvd. to Etiwanda Avenue 3. Church Street, Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Blvd. 4. Church Street, Day Creek Blvd. to Victoria Park Lane Not Posted 45 Not Posted 40 Not Posted 45 Not Posted 40 SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE June 1, 2005 Page 2 Name of Street and Limits Existing Posted Speed Limit (mph) Proposed Prima Facie Speed Limit (mph) 5. Church Street, Victoria Park Lane to Etiwanda Avenue 6. Day Creek Blvd., Foothill Blvd. to Chumh Street 7. Day Creek Blvd., Church Street to Base Line Road 8. Day Creek Blvd., 1-210 Freeway to Banyan Street 9. Day Creek Blvd., Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue 10. Ellena West, Base Line Road to Base Line Road 11. Miller Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue 12. Milliken Avenue, Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue 13. Victoria Gardens Lane, Day Creek Blvd. to Church Street 14. Victoria Park Lane, Church Street to Base Line Road Not Posted 40 Not Posted 45 Not Posted 50 Not Posted 45 Not Posted 45 Not Posted 35 Not Posted 40 Not Posted 45 Not Posted 35 Not Posted 45 (i) Both sixty-five (65) miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; and (ii) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; and (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. SPEED LIMIT ORDINANCE June 1, 2005 Page 3 Section 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Inland Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: William J. Alexander Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the Executed this · at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk THE CITY 0 F ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingfid Y. Brace, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1, MASI PLAZA, AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND REASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1999-1 WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual levy for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within Assessment District No. 93-1, Masi Plaza, at the southwest comer of Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and Reassessment District No. 1999-1. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal year 2005/2006. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of assessment districts that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ANNUAL LEVY June 1, 2005 Page 2 Rancho Cucamonga's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public are funded from this fee. This fee is in place now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of service. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attachment: Resolution Map -2- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, and has confirmed assessments upon land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Assessment Districts"); and WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, the City does incur necessary administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments of the assessment within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Govemment Code Section 8682. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: Treasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of the installments and of the interest thereon, not to exceed the Treasurer's estimate of the expenses of collection. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary administrative expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. Resolution No. Page 2 . SECTION 3: The above assessment surcharge, when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this __ AYES: day of June 2005. NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the __ day of June 2005. Executed this __ day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. I ! ! ! Base Line Rd I Foothill Blvd Arrow Rt 8th St ~o ~' 6th .c_ Assessment District 93-1 i~ ~ [ i o ~ ! (~ LU I WiLson Av Foothill Bivd Arrow Rt ! ! ! Legend ~ ~'~ City Limits uJ ~1~ AD 93-1 · Cth St ~ 0 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.8 ]IV es Hillside Reassessment District 1999-1 Wilson Av Base Base Line Rd Arrow Rt 8th St O ~) 6th ~rrow Rt i Legend ! ~ City Limits (~ AD 86-2 ~1~ AD 89-1 ~'~<~ 4th St ~ 0 0.250.5 I 1.5 TH E C I T Y OF ~ANCHO CUCAHONGA Repo DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECt: June 1, 2005 Mayor and members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingfid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Cotmcil adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual special tax levy of $14,369 an acm per parcel to discharge bond obligations in Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Govermnent Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for fiscal year 2005/2006. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 1, 1993, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000. On December 15, 1993, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 518 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on March 15, 1994, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public improvements that are required for and will permit the development of the properties within the district. On June 3, 1999, City Council adopted resolution No. 99-127 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in July, 1999 in the amount of $4,525,000. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFD NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) June 1, 2005 Page 2 While the property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $20,000 per acre, the tax rate that is needed to meet obligations for fiscal year 2005-2006 is adjusted downward to $14,369 per acre. This special tax shall be levied as long as necessary for each parcel of taxable property to pay for the facilities and to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Annual Status Report Map -2- SOL,mOS SO. V-fi" / $.5' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy ora special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACiLITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy ora special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2005-2006 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incOrporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rote as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Resolution No. Page 2 Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and Do Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax,. and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. Resolution No. Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: day of June 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2005. Executed this day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Debra J. Adams, CMC, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JUNE 2005 Resolution No. Page 5 BACKGROUND On December 15, 1993, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of the street, storm drain, sewer and water improvements. The district is bounded on the north by Foothill Blvd., on the east by Etiwanda Ave. and on the west by Interstate 15. The maximum rate has been set at $20,000 per acre. This amount can be levied at a lower rate but cannot exceed the maximum tax rate as set. On July 1, 1999 this district was refunded as part of Rancho Cucamonga Reassessment District No. 1999-1 under the Rancho Cucamonga Public Finance Authority (the "Authority"). The Authority issued bonds to acquire the Acquired Obligations, fund separate reserve funds and pay the costs of issuing the Bonds. The acquired obligations for Community Facilities District 93-3 is the aggregate principal amount of $4,525,000. FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 The annual tax rate of $14,369 for fiscal year 2005-2006 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of $403,540. Resolution No. Page 6 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $403,540 $ 36,570 $ 1,500 $ 0 $441,610 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE TRANSFER IN FROM FUND BALANCE SPECIAL TAX $14,369 PER ACRE $ 0 $ 8,500 $ 9,220 $423,890 $441,610 n'l ! ! Millsida R~ ! Banyan Base Line i m Foothill Blvd Arrow Rt 8th St > . ~th :12 Community Facilities District 93-3 I,~ < >' '- ! Wilson Av Foothill Blvd 4th St LIJ Arrow Rt i ! i Legend < ~ City Limits LU ~1~ CFD 93-3 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 ~ Miles T H E CITY [ ~ANCHO CUCAHONGA Staff' Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO MAINTAIN LEVY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) AT CURRENT LEVELS WITH NO INCREASE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for developed properties for fiscal year 2005/2006 rates. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 21, 1989, the City Council approved the formation of Community Facilities District No. 88-2 for Drainage Capital Facilities and Law Enforcement services and authorized the annual levy of special taxes to pay debt service on the bonds and cover the costs of police operations and maintenance. The special tax being levied annually for the drainage facilities are in Special Tax A - Drainage Facilities. On April 7, 1994, City Council approved Resolution No. 94-058, authorizing the issuance of bonds. On June 3, 1999, City Council adopted Resolution No.99-127 authorizing the refunding of special tax bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in July 1999 in the amount of $2,705,000. The special tax was set at 91% of the maximum rate when the district was formed for the developed property. However, the authorized bond refunding adjusted the rate to 78% of the maximum special tax for the developed and undeveloped property. The collections from the annual levy will be used to pay debt service through the life of the bonds. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFD NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) June 1, 2005 Page 2 The levy of special taxes annually for the Law Enforcement services are listed in Special Tax B - Law Enforcement. When the City receives the collections, the funds for Special Tax B - Law Enforcement are transferred to the General Fund to offset the Law Enforcement costs. Special Tax A - Drainage Facilities Residential Class I (3590+ S.F.) $735 Residential Class II (3077-3589 S.F.) $544 Residential Class III (2564-3076 S.F.) $408 Residential Class 1V (2308-2563 S.F.) $326 Residemial Class V (2051-2307 S.F.) $272 Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) $190 Undeveloped Property $1,190/acre Special Tax B - Law Enfomement Residential Class I (3590 + S.F) $1.00 Residential Class II (3077-3587 S.F.) $1.00 Residential Class III (2564-3076 S.F.) $1.00 Residential Class IV (2308-2563 S.F.) $1.00 Residential Class V (2051-2307 S.F.) $1.00 Residential Class VI (Less than 2051 S.F.) $1.00 Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map -2- RESOLUTION NO. ~,~" / 8 b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ' ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 (Drainage and Law Enfomement) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 2005-2006 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the ~ame manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. Resolution No. Page PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: day ofJune 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2005. Executed this day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-2 EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. SPECIAL TAX "A" - DRAINAGE FACILITIES PROPERTY CATEGORIES There are two categories of property subject to the levy of Special Tax "A", which are identified as follows: 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessors's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued as of May 31 of any year. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of Special Tax "A:, is: (i) owned by a public entity; (ii) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or (iii) zoned as open space. TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND SPECIAL TAX "A" RATES Thetax~ngclassfficat~onsfortheabovePropertyCategonesandtheauthonzedSpec~alTax A rate for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 are as follows: Resolution No. Page Taxing Classification 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY Residential Class I (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Residential II (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Co Residential m (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Residential Class 1V (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Residential Class V (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Fo Residential Class VI (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * Tax Rate $735 per year $544 per year $408 per year $326 per year $272 per year $190 per year ° UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY All Undeveloped Property $1,190 per acre per year ** Resolution No. Page The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling unit. The acreage of an Undeveloped Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX "A" Special Tax "A" shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax "A" revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District related to the financing of authorized public facilities, which may include, without limitation, payment of debt service on any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such bonded indebtedness; funding of any required sinking fund necessary to pay for future public facilities or debt service; or direct payment for public facilities (CFD Expenses"). The annual levy of Special Tax "A" shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1: The Community Facilities District shall estimate the amount of CFD Expenses which must be paid for fi.om Special Tax "A" revenues collected during the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax "A" levy is to be established (the "Required Special Tax "A" Revenue"). STEP 2: That equal percentage of the Special Tax "A" rate, not to exceed 78% of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate, applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax "A" revenue in the Fiscal Year of the levy equal to the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue for such Fiscal Year shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 3: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Undeveloped Property necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Undeveloped Property. Resolution No. Page STEP 4: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, that equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax "A" rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate such additional Special Tax "A" revenue shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 5: If additional Special Tax "A" revenues are still necessary to generate the Required Special Tax "A" Revenue, the Community Facilities District shall: A. Compare (i) the Special Tax "A" rate which would be levied on each Developed Property combining STEP 2 and STEP 4 above with (ii) the product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax "A". The Base Maximum Special Tax "A" means an amount equal to $0.054 per' square foot of the lot or parcel. B. If the product described in (ii) above exceeds the Special Tax "A" rate described in (i) above for any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax "A" rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed the product described in (ii) above necessary to generate the additional Special Tax "A" revenues to equal the Required Special Tax "A" Revenues. Resolution No. Page SPECIAL TAX "B" - LAW ENFORCEMENT All Developed Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Tax "B". The authorized Special Tax "B" rates for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 are as follows: Taxing Classification Tax Rate 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $1.00 per year (More than 3,590 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * B. Residential Class II $1.00 per year (3,077-3,589 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * C. Residential Class Iii $1.00 per year (2,564-3,076 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * D. Residemial Class 1V $1.00 per year (2,308-2,563 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * E. Residential Class V $1.00 per year (2,051-2,307 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * F. Residential Class VI $1.00 per year (Less than 2,051 square feet of dwelling unit living area) * -lq7 19th Base Line i ! Foothill BIvd Arrow Rt 8th St ~o ~' 6th ! Community Facilities District 88-2 Wilson Av Line Rd Foothill Blvd 4th St LIJ Arrow Rt I i L~g~nd ~ City Limits ~1~ CFD 88-2 UJ O 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 T H E C I T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECt: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director lngrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2 ), SERIES 2003-B. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for the new Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2 Zones 1 & 2), Series 2003-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2), Series 2003-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,855,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 82 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 2 (Zones 1 & 2). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church Street, north of Arrow Route and east of Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow Route north, to Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard north, to Church Street. The District is located within the Victoria Community Plan of the City. Page 2 June 1, 2005 City Council Staff Report CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2) Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public street improvements, storm drain and flood control and water and sewer improvements to serve property located within the District and a cultural center to be owned by the City, which will include a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Respectfully submitted, Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 03-031, adopted on February 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (the "District") and established within the District improvement areas designated Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2 (the "Improvement Area"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on February 19, 2003, the qualified electors of the Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2 unanimously approved the levy of a special tax against properties in the Improvement Area (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 699 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on March 3, 2003 the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the District delivered its $2,855,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2 Special Tax Bonds Series 2003-B (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of July 1, 2003 by and between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax within the Improvement Area No. 2, Zones 1 & 2 for each fiscal year in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal year, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, interest will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Year 2005- 2006 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: · SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. 151 SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2005. ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2005. Executed this day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2, ZONES 1 & 2) SERIES 2003-B EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Improvement Area No. 2 Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. 1. 1. ZONE 1 a. Zone 1 (i). MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE Developed Property Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Pamel in Zone 1 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 1 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 1. (ii). Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall equal $2,799 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. (iii). Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall equal $3,110 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. b. Zone 1 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone I of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall be $3,110 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. 2. ZONE2 a. Zone 2 Developed Property (i). Maximum Special Tax Thc Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel in Zone 2 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 2 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 2. (ii). Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall equal $8,480 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. 1. ZONE 1 (iii). Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall equal $9,423 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two pement (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. b. Zone 2 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) shall be $9,423 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 1 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 1 is equal to the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 1 each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 in an amount equal to 100% of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 whose Maximum Special Tax is equal to the Backup Special Tax shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Year levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one 15(-,, go (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Special Tax in Zone 1 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) Bonds have already been issued, or (ii) the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. 2. ZONE 2 Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 2 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 2 is equal to the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 2 each Fiscal Year as follows: First.' The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 in an amount equal to 100% of th6 Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 2 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 whose Maximum Special Tax is equal to the Backup Special Tax shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Year levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Special Tax in Zone 2 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) Bonds have already been issued, or (ii) the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 2) Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. EXEMPTIONS ZONE 1 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 1. ZONE 2 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 2. Community Facilities District 2003-01 Series B Hillside R~ 19th Base Line Rd I ] I Foothill Blvd ~ Rd Foothill Blvd Arrow Rt 8th St > 4th St o LU Arrow Rt I I Legend CFD 2003-01 Series B C:~ Impovement Area No. 2: Zone 1 C~ Impovement Area NO, 2: Zone 2 0 0.250.~1 1.5 I T Y © F ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staa'Re t DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Brace, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for the new Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 Zones 1, 2 & 3), Series 2003-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 19, 2003, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1), Series 2003-A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,645,000. On March 5, 2003, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 699 approving the levy of the special tax, and on May 21, 2003 approved Resolution No. 03-125 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District consists of approximately 229 gross acres, of which 147 acres are designated as Improvement Area No. 1 (Zones 1, 2 & 3). The District boundary is located in the eastern part of the City generally west of Interstate 15, south of Church Street, north of Arrow Route and east of Southern California Edison easement corridor from Arrow Route north, to Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard from Foothill Boulevard north, to Church Street. The District is located within the Victoria Community Plan of the City. Page 2 June 1, 2005 City Council StaffReport CFD 2003-01 (Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3) Bonds were issued on August 20, 2003 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and construction of certain public street improvements, storm drain and flood control and water and sewer improvements to serve property located within the District and a cultural center to be owned by the City, which will include a performing arts center, public library and banquet hall/meeting room. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map RESOLUTION NO. ~ $"" t ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHiNG ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (iMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3), SERIES 2003-A Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 03-031, adopted on February 19, 2003, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (the "District") and established within the District improvement areas designated Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3 (the "Improvement Area"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on February 19, 2003, the qualified electors of the Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3 unanimously approved the levy of a special tax against properties in the Improvement Area (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 699 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on March 3, 2003 the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2003, the District delivered its $14,645,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3 Special Tax Bonds Series 2003-A (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of July 1, 2003 by and between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax within the Improvement Area No. 1, Zones 1, 2 & 3 for each fiscal year in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal year, plus administrative, expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, interest will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Year 2005- 2006 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and Do Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fired. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2005. Executed this day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1, ZONES 1, 2 & 3) SERIES 2003-A EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Improvement Area No. 1 Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. ZONE1 a. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE Zone 1 (i). (ii). Developed Property Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Pamel in Zone 1 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 1 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 1. Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall equal $4,318 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, . 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. (iii). Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall equal $4,798 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. Zone 1 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall be $4,798 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. ZONE2 a. Zone 2 Developed Property (i). Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel in Zone 2 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 2 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 2. (ii). Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall equal $36,294 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. (iii). Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall equal $40,327 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. Zone 2 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone 2 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall be $12,817 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. ZONE 3 a. Zone 3 Developed Property (i). Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel in Zone 3 classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of(i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special Tax for Zone 3 or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax for Zone 3. (ii). Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall equal $10,272 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Assigned Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. (iii). Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall equal $11,413 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Backup Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. b. Zone 3 Undeveloped Property The Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property in Zone 3 of CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) shall be $11,413 per Acre for Fiscal Year 2003-04, and shall increase thereafter, commencing on July 1, 2004 and on July 1 of each Fiscal Year thereafter, by an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the Maximum Special Tax for the previous Fiscal Year. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX ZONE 1 Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 1 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 1 is equal to the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 1 each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 in an amount equal to 100% of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 1 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 1 Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 1 whose Maximum Special Tax is equal to the Backup Special Tax shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Year levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Special Tax in Zone 1 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) Bonds have already been issued, or (ii) the Cotmcil has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten pement as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within Zone 1, except for those Residential Properties whose owners are also delinquent or in default on their Special Tax payments for one or more other properties within Zone 1. 2. ZONE 2 Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 2 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 2 is equal to the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 2 each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 2 in an amount equal to 100% of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 2 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 2 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Year levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Special Tax in Zone 2 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) Bonds have already been issued, or (ii) the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment.. 3. ZONE 3 Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Zone 3 Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax in Zone 3 until the amount of Special Taxes levied in Zone 3 is equal to the Zone 3 Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied in Zone 3 each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 3 in an amount equal to 100% of the Assigned Special Tax for Developed Property; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 3 Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property in Zone 3 at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Undeveloped Property; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Zone 3 Special Tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in Zone 3 whose Maximum Special Tax is equal to the Backup Special Tax shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel. Notwithstanding the above, the Council may in any Fiscal Year levy Proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when the Council no longer must levy a Special Tax in Zone 3 pursuant to steps two and three above, and (i) all authorized CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) Bonds have already been issued, or (ii) the Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional CFD No. 2003-01 (IA No. 1) Bonds (except reftmding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes levied under this Rate and Method of Apportionment. EXEMPTIONS 1. ZONE 1 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 1. 2. ZONE 2 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 2. In addition, no Special Tax shall be levied on Privately Owned Exempt Parking Property in Zone 2. Furthermore, no Special Tax shall be levied on up to 10.56 Acres of Privately Owned Specific Retail Property in Zone 2. Tax-exempt status will be assigned by the CFD Administrator in the chronological order in which property in Zone 2 becomes Privately Owned Specific Retail Property. If the total number of Acres of Privately Owned Specific Retail Property exceeds the amount stated above, then the Acres exceeding such total shall be taxed at the applicable rates for Developed Property for Zone 2 as set forth in Section C above and to the extent set forth in Section D above. ZONE 3 No Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property in Zone 3. Hillside R! 19th Base Line Rd I ! I Foothill Blvd Arrow RI P ~6thl 4th ! Community Facilities District 2003-01 Series A Foothill Blvd Arrow Rt i 4th St I Legend "~ CFD 2003-01 Series A u.i C:5 Impovement Area No. 1: Zone 1 C~ Impovement Area No. 1: Zone 2 C:3 Impovement Area NO. 1: Zone 3 0 0.250.~1 1.5 I T ¥ 0 F ~ANCHO CUCAHONGA Sta eport DATE: TO: FROM: BY: S~: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE APPROVED RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for the new Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello- Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of- way, storm drain and flood control improvements. Page 2 June 1, 2005 City Council Staff Report CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area 3) The property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $1963.45 per acre. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO.3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 01-162, adopted on June 20, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (the "District") and established within the District an improvement area designated Improvement Area No. 3 (the "Improvement Area"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on June 20, 2001, the qualified electors of the Improvement Area unanimously approved the levy of a special tax against properties in the Improvement Area (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 658 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on July 18, 2001, the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 2001, the District delivered its $935,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 Improvement Area No. 3 Zone 7 Special Tax Bonds Series 2001-B (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of August 1, 2001, by and between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax within the Improvement Area for each fiscal year in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal year, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, debt service will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Year 2005-2006 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such debt service; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District fimds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2005. Executed this day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. Debra J. Adams, CMC, Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 3 ZONE 7) SERIES 2001-B EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within each Zone of Improvement Area No. 3 shall be classified as Taxable or Non-Taxable Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE A. The Maximum Special Tax and Taxable Acreage for Taxable Property and Taxable Public Property for each Zone is shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 Zone Taxable Bond Maximum Tax Acreage Share Per Acre Zone 1 - Future RDA 55.00 91.70% $15,230.37 Zone 7 - Leggio South 42.74 8.30% $ 1,963.45 Assignment of Maximum Annual Special Tax to Successor Parcels. The Community Facilities District (CFD) Administrator shall assign the Maximum Annual Special Tax to each Successor Parcel as follows: 1) When an Original or Successor Parcel is subdivided, the CFD Administrator shall classify the resulting Successor Parcels as Taxable Parcels or Tax-Exempt parcels using the definitions in the rate and method of apportionment of special tax. 2) If the Successor Parcel is a Taxable Parcel: Calculate the percentage of the taxable Successor Parcels' square footage to the total square footage for all taxable Successor Parcels of that Original or Successor Parcel; then, Multiply this percentage by the Maximum Annual Special Tax assigned to the previous Original Parcel or Successor Parcel. The result of this calculation is the Maximum Annual Special Tax for the Taxable Successor Parcel. C. Taxable Parcels Acquired by a Public Agency Taxable Parcels that are acquired by a public agency after the CFD is formed will remain subject to the applicable Special Tax unless the Special Tax obligation is satisfied pursuant to Section 53317.5 o the Government Code. An exception to this maybe made if the Public use planned for a Public Parcel within the CFD is relocated to a Taxable Parcel and the previously Tax-Exempt Parcel of comparable acreage becomes a Taxable Parcel. This trading of Parcels will be permitted to the extent that there is no net loss in Maximum Special Tax. It is anticipated that the City will acquire approximately 55 Acres that will be subject to the Special Tax. APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX For each Fiscal Year the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax, taking into consideration the levy of the Improvement Area No. 3 Special Tax, until the amount of Special Taxes and Improvement Area No. 3 Special Taxes equal the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax; or Second: If less monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied proportionately on each Taxable Parcel at less than 100% of the Maximum Special Tax; provided that the Council may levy an amount in excess of the Special Tax Requirement if all authorized Bonds have not already been issued. /'17 Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within Improvement Area No. 3, except for those Residential Properties whose owners are also delinquent or in default on their Special Tax payments for one or more other properties within Improvement Area No.3. 19th Base Line Rd I ! I Foothill Bird Arrow Rt 8th St ~ 6th .c_ Community Facilities District 2001-01 Series 2001-B Line Rd 4th St '(3 UJ Foothill Bird 2001-B Rt CFD 2001-01 C3 Improvement Area 1 C3, Improvement Area 2 C5 Improvement Area 3 Zone 1 C~, Improvement Area 3 Zone 7 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 ~ Miles T Y 0 F RANCHO CUCAM ONGA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: S~: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE APPROVED RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for the new Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2), Series 2001-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2), Series 2001-A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of- way, storm drain and flood control improvements. Page 2 June 1, 2005 City Council Staff Report CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2) This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through the life of the bonds. The levy of special taxes annually for Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 are as follows: Improvement Area No. 1 Land Use Description Residential Assigned Class Floor Area Special Tax 1 Single Family Proper~y - > 3,250 sq. ft. $2,100 per residential dwelling unit 2 Single Family Property 2,950 to 3,249 sq. fi. $1,684 per residential dwelling unit 3 Single Family Property 2,650 to 2,949 sq. fi. $1,515 per residential dwelling unit 4 Single Family Property 2,350 to 2,649 sq. fi. $1,301 per residential dwelling unit 5 Single Family Property 2,150 to 2,349 sq. fl. $1,217 per residential dwelling unit 6 Single Family Property 1,950 to 2,149 sq. fi. $1,119 per residential dwelling unit 7 Single Family Property < 1,950 sq. fi. $938 per residential dwelling unit 8 Apartment Property Not Applicable $237 per residential dwelling unit 9 Non Residential Property Not Applicable $8,398 per Acre Improvement Area No. 2 Land Use Description Assigned Special Tax Class 1 Apartment Proper~y $237 per unit 2 Other Residential $10,768 per Acre Property 3 Non-Residential $0.63 per square foot of Non- Property Residential Floor Area Page 3 June 1, 2005 City Council Staff Report CFD 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2) Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map 152. R SOLUT Or SO. iq D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A Recitals WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 01-162, adopted on June 20, 2001, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City Council"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Section 53311 and following of the California Government Code) (the "Act") established City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (the "District") and established within the District improvement areas designated Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 (the "Improvement Areas"); and WHEREAS, at an election held on June 20, 2001, the qualified electors of the Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 unanimously approved the levy of a special tax against properties in the Improvement Areas (the "Special Tax"); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. 658 (the "Ordinance"), adopted on July 18, 2001, the City Council authorized the levy of the Special Tax in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, on September 18, 2001, the District delivered its $14,240,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 Special Tax Bonds Series 2001-A (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in a Fiscal Agent Agreement dated as of August 1, 2001, by and between the City and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Fiscal Agent"), the City covenanted to fix and levy the Special Tax within the Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 for each fiscal year in an amount required for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds becoming due and payable during that fiscal year, plus administrative expenses, but taking into account certain balances in funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the "Covenant"); and WHEREAS, debt service will become due and payable on the Bonds during Fiscal Year 2005-2006 in an amount exceeding funds held by the Fiscal Agent and designated for the payment for such debt service; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy the Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 as authorized by the Ordinance and required by the Covenant; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to provide for the collection of such Special Tax for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 by City staff. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the Special Tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2005. Executed this day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, Resolution No. Page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 & IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2) SERIES 2001-A EXHIBIT "A" The Resolution establishing the annual special tax refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2005/2006. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Improvement Area No. 1 Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 1 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property, and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the sections below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE Developed Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of (i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special tax or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax. (b) Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Land Use class is shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 Assigned Special Taxes For Developed Property Improvement Area No. 1 Land Use Description Residential Assigned Class Floor Area Special Tax 1 Single Family Property = > 3,250 sq. ft. $2,100 per residential dwelling unit 2 Single Family Property 2,950 to 3,249 sq. ft. $1,684 per residential dwelling unit 3 Single Family Property 2,650 to 2,949 sq. ft. $1,515 per residential dwelling unit 4 Single Family Property 2,350 to 2,649 sq. ft. $1,301 per residential dwelling unit 5 Single Family Property 2,150 to 2,349 sq. ft. $1,217 per residential dwelling unit 6 Single Family Property 1,950 to 2,149 sq. ft. $1,119 per residential dwelling unit 7 Single Family Property < 1,950 sq. ft. $938 per residential dwelling unit 8 Apartment Property Not Applicable $237 per residential dwelling unit 9 Non Residential Property Not Applicable $8,398 per Acre (c). Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Assigned Special tax levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Assigned Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax that can be levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes that can be levied for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel derived by application of the Backup Special Tax. For an Assessor's Parcel that comains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each Land Use Class as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. o (c) Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax shall equal $10, 768 per acre. Final Mapped Property (a). Intermediate Special Tax The Intermediate Special Tax shall only be levied on Assessor's Parcels of the Final Mapped Property. To compute the Intermediate Special Tax attributable to a Final Subdivision, the Acreage of all Developed Property and Final Mapped Property within that Final Subdivision shall be multiplied by $7,500. The Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property planned for residential development shall then be computed by dividing the Intermediate Special Tax attributable to the applicable Final Subdivision by the total number of Assessor's Parcels planned for residential development within that Final Subdivision (i.e., the number of residential lots). The Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property in a Final Subdivision planned exclusively for non-residential development shall equal $7,500 multiplied by the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel. If a final Subdivision includes Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property and Final Mapped Property planned for both residential and non-residential development, then the Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property planned for residential development shall be calculated as described above based exclusively on the Acreage of the residential Final Mapped Property. Conversely, the Intermediate Special Tax for each assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property planned for non- residential development shall be calculated as described above based exclusively on the Acreage of the non-residential Final Mapped Property. The CFD Administrator shall allocate the Acreage of each Assessor's Parcel in the Final Subdivision to residential and non-residential development based on the projected use of each such Assessor's Parcel. (b) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for Final Mapped Property shall be $10,768 per · Acre. Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, and Undeveloped Property. The Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, and Undeveloped Property shall be $10, 768 per Acre. APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX For each Fiscal Year the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax, taking into consideration the levy of the Improvement Area No. 2 (I A No. 2) Special Tax, until the amount of Special Taxes and Improvement Area No. 2 Special Taxes equal the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms ofI A No. 2 Rate and Method (RMA), the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 2 Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable I A No. 2 Assigned Special Tax; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special tax shall be levied on each assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property at up to 100% of the Intermediate Special Tax for Final Mapped Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms ofI A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 2 Final Mapped Property up to 100% of the I A No. 2 Intermediate Special Tax for I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property, with the levy on Final Mapped Property and I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property being Proportionate; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up $7,500 per acre; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 2 Underdeveloped Property at up to $7,500 per Acre, with the levy on Undeveloped Property and I A No. 2 Undeveloped Property being Proportionate; Fourth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the ! A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 2 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 2 Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the I A No. 2 Maximum Special Tax for I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 2 Undeveloped Property, with the levy on Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property and I A No. 2 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 2 Undeveloped Property being Proportionate; Fifth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first four steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property whose Maximum Special Tax is determined through the application of the Backup Special Tax shall be increased in equal percentages from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 2 RMA, the levy of the I A No. 2 Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 2 Developed Property whose I A No. 2 Maximum Special Tax is determined through the application of the I A No. 2 Backup Special Tax shall be increased in equal percentages from the I A No. 2 Assigned Special Tax up to the I A No. 2 Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel, with the levy on Developed Property and I A No. 2 Developed Property being Proportionate; Sixth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first five steps have been completed, then the Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 2 RMA, the I A No. 2 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI ANo. 2 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 2 Taxable Public Property at up to the I A No. 2 Maximum Special Tax for I A No. 2 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 2 Taxable Public Property, with the levy on Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property and I A No. 2 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 2 Taxable Public Property being Proportionate. Notwithstanding the above the city Council may, in any Fiscal Year, levy proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax and the I A No. 2 Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when (i) the City Council is no longer required to levy a Special Tax pursuant to steps two through six above and the City Council is no longer required to levy an I A No. 2 Special Tax pursuant to steps two through six (above) of the I A No. 2 RMA in order to meet the Special Tax Requirement; (ii) all authorized I A No. 1 and I A No. 2 Bonds have already been issued or the City Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional I A No. 1 and I A No. 2 Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes and I A No. 2 Special Taxes; and (iii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed and/or acquired. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel or Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten pement as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within I A No. 1 or I A No. 2, except for those Residential Properties whose owners are also delinquent or in default on their Special Tax payments for one or more other properties within I A No. 1 or I A No. 2. CLASSIFICATION OF PARCELS Improvement Area No. 2 Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 2 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property, and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the Sections III, IV and V below. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE Developed Property (a) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Developed Property shall be the greater of(i) the amount derived by application of the Assigned Special tax or (ii) the amount derived by application of the Backup Special Tax. (b) Assigned Special Tax The Assigned Special Tax for each Land Use class is shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 Assigned Special Taxes For Developed Property Improvement Area No. 2 Land Use Description Assigned Special Tax Class 1 Apartment Property $237 per unit' 2 Other Residential $10,768 per Acre Property 3 Non-Residential $0.63 per square foot of Non- Property Residential Floor Area Iql (c). Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Assigned Special Tax levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Assigned Special Taxes for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. The Maximum Special Tax that can be levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes that can be levied for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel derived by application of the Backup Special Tax. For an Assessor's Parcel that contains both Residential Property and Non-Residential Property, the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel shall be allocated to each type of property based on the amount of Acreage designated for each Land Use Class as determined by reference to the site plan approved for such Assessor's Parcel. The CFD Administrator's allocation to each type of property shall be final. (c) Backup Special Tax The Backup Special Tax shall equal $10, 061 per acre. Final Mapped Property (a). Intermediate Special Tax The Intermediate Special Tax shall only be levied on Assessors Parcels of the Final Mapped Property. To compute the Intermediate Special Tax attributable to a Final Subdivision, the Acreage of all Developed Property and Final Mapped Property within that Final Subdivision shall be multiplied by $7,500. The Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property planned for residential development shall then be computed by dividing the Intermediate Special Tax attributable to the applicable Final Subdivision by the total number of Assessor's Parcels planned for residential development within that Final Subdivision (i.e., the number of residential lots). The Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property in a Final Subdivision planned exclusively for non-residential development shall equal $7,500 multiplied by the Acreage of such Assessor's Parcel. If a final Subdivision includes Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property and Final Mapped Property planned for both residential and non-residential development, then the Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property planned for residential development shall be calculated as described above based exclusively on the Acreage of the residential Final Mapped Property. Conversely, the Intermediate Special Tax for each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property planned for non- residential development shall be calculated as described above based exclusively on the Acreage of the non-residential Final Mapped Property. The CFD Administrator shall allocate the Acreage of each Assessor's Parcel in the Final Subdivision to residential and non-residential development based on the projected use of each such Assessor's Parcel. (c) Maximum Special Tax The Maximum Special Tax for Final Mapped Property shall be $10,768 per Acre. Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, and Undeveloped Property. The Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, and Undeveloped Property shall be $10, 768 per Acre. APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX For each Fiscal Year the City Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement and levy the Special Tax, taking into consideration the levy of the Improvement Area No. 1 (I A No. 1) Special Tax, until the amount of Special Taxes and Improvement Area No. 1 Special Taxes equal the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Assigned Special Tax; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms ofI A. No. 1 Rate and Method (RMA), the I A No. 1 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 1 Developed Property in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable I A No. 1 Assigned Special Tax; Second: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first step has been completed, the Special tax shall be levied on each Aassessor's Pamel of Final Mapped Property at up to 100% of the Intermediate Special Tax for Final Mapped Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms ofI A No. 1 RMA, the I A No. I Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 1 Final Mapped Property up to 100% of the I A No. 1 Intermediate Special Tax for I A No. 1 Final Mapped Property, with the levy on Final Mapped Property and I A No. I Final Mapped Property being Proportionate; Third: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special tax Requirement after the first two steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property at up $7,500 per acre; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 1 RMA, the I A No. 1 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 1 Underdeveloped Property at up to $7,500 per Acre, with the levy on Undeveloped Property and I A No. 1Undeveloped Property being Proportionate; Fourth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first steps have been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel of Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax for Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 1 RMA, the I A No. 1 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 1 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 1 Undeveloped Property at up to 100% of the I A No. 1 Maximum Special Tax for I A No. 1 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 1 Undeveloped Property, with the levy on Final Mapped Property and Undeveloped Property and I A No. 1 Final Mapped Property and I A No. 1 Undeveloped . Property being Proportionate; Fifth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first four steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property whose Maximum Special Tax is determined through the application of the Backup Special Tax shall be increased in equal percentages from the Assigned Special Tax up to the Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 1 RMA, the levy of the I A No. 1 Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 1 Developed Property whose I A No. 1 Maximum Special Tax is determined through the application of the I A No. 1 Backup Special Tax shall be increased in equal percentages from the I A No. 12 Assigned Special Tax up to the I A No. 1 Maximum Special Tax for each such Assessor's Parcel, with the levy on Developed Property and I A No. 1 Developed Property being Proportionate; Sixth: If additional monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement after the first five steps have been completed, then the levy of the Special Tax on each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property at up to the Maximum Special Tax for Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property; and the City Council shall be notified by the CFD Administrator that under the terms of the I A No. 1 RMA, the I A No. 1 Special Tax shall be levied on each Assessor's Parcel ofI A No. 1 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 1 Taxable Public Property at up to the I A No. 1 Maximum Special Tax for I A No. 1 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. l Taxable Public Property, with the levy on Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Taxable Public Property and I A No. 1 Taxable Property Owner Association Property or I A No. 1 Taxable Public Property being Proportionate. Notwithstanding the above the City Council may, in any Fiscal Year, levy proportionately less than 100% of the Assigned Special Tax and the I A No. 1 Assigned Special Tax in step one (above) when (i) the City Council is no longer required to levy a Special Tax pursuant to steps two through six above and the City Council is no longer required to levy an I A No. 1 Special Tax pursuant to steps two through six (above) of the I A No. 1 RMA in order 'to meet the Special Tax Requirement; (ii) all authorized Bonds have already been issued or the City Council has covenanted that it will not issue any additional Bonds (except refunding bonds) to be supported by Special Taxes and I A No. 1 Special Taxes; and (iii) all Authorized Facilities have been constructed and/or acquired. Further notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel or Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within I A No. 1 or I A No. 2, except for those Residential Properties whose owners are also delinquent or in default on their Special Tax payments for one or more other properties within I A No. 1 or I A No. 2. Community Facilities District 2001-01 Series 2001-A --> · I ~ ~ ! Wilson Av Base Line i m Foothill Blvd Foothill Blvd ~ Rd I1-A Arrow Rt 8th St 4th St i Arrow Rt Legend CFD 2001-01 C3 Improvement Area 1 C3 Improvement Area 2 C~ Improvement Area 3 Zone 1 C~ Improvement Area 3 Zone 7 00.250.01 1.5 T H E C I T Y OF ~ANCHO CUCAHONGA Slaff Rel DATE:. - TO: FROM: BY: S~: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. CORPORATE PARK). SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual special tax levy of $3,896 an acre per parcel to discharge bond obligations in Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000. On December 6, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 646 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route Highway and Foothill Boulevard; such street improvements to include but not to be limited to: demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFD NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) June 1, 2005 Page 2 The property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $3,896 per acre. On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2002 the Maximum Annual Special tax shall be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect for the previous fiscal year. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2035-2036. Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Annual Status Report Map A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy ora special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2005-2006 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: Resolution No. Page Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. Resolution No. Page PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: day ofJune 2005. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2005. Executed this day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK ANNUAL STATUS REPORT JUNE 2005 Resolution No. Page BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route Highway and Foothill Boulevard; such street improvements to include but not to be limited to: demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. The district was approved setting the maximum rate at $3,896 per acre. However, on each July 1, commencing July 1, 2002 the Maximum Annual Special tax shall be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect for the previous fiscal year. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2035-2036. FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 The annual tax rate for fiscal year 2005-2006 will be $4,054 per acre, and will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of $505,630.00. Resolution No. Page COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY CONTRACT SERVICES DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $505,630 $ 48,500 $ 1,500 $ 0 $555,630 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS INTEREST REVENUE FUND BALANCE SPECIAL TAX $3,974 PER ACRE $ 0 $ 4,000 $ 19,550 $532,080 $555,630 Hillside 19th Base Line Rd I ! I % i Foothill Bird Arrow Rt Community Facilities District 2000-02 Foothill Bird Arrow Rt 8th St 4th ~%, City Limits ~ CFD 2000-02 0 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 ~ Miles o F ~ANCHO CUCAHONGA Staff Report DATE: June 1,2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase to the current rate for fiscal year 2005/2006. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,365,000. On November 15, 2,000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 645 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public facilities that included street, sewer, water, storm drain, landscaping and park improvements that are required for and will permit the development of the properties within the district. The levy of special taxes annually is based on the square footage of the home for residential properties and is based on acreage for non-residential properties. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CFDNO. 2000-01(SOUTH ETIWANDA) June 1, 2005 Page 2 Land Use Class 1 2 3 4 Special Tax Residential Floor Area 2,301 Sq. Ft. or greater 1,801 - 2,300 Sq. Ft. 1,800 Sq. Ft. or less Non-Residential Property Assigned Facilities Special Tax $500 per unit 475 per unit 425 per unit $3,700 per Acre Respectfully submitted, Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Attachments: Resolution Exhibit "A" Map -2- so ,mo so. O.Y../qg A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next Fiscal Year 2005/2006 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. Resolution No. Page SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and pementages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. Resolution No. Page PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: day of June 2005. ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2005. Executed this day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Banyan Base i Arrow 8th St .o ~6th Community Facilities District 2000-01 Line Rd :ooth[ll Blvd < < ~ ~ Arrow Rt i I < Legend ~'~, City Limits LU ~ CFD 2000-01 4th St O 0 0.250.5 1 1.5 TH E CITY OF I I~ANCHO CUCAHONGA Surf Rctx DATE: TO: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Lawrence 1. Temple, Administrative Services Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual benefit assessment levy for the maintenance and/or servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin). There is no increase from the current tax rate for fiscal year 2005/2006. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 6, 1991, City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-331 for the annual levy of benefit assessments for the maintenance and/or servicing of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2, Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Drainage Area No. 91-2 was a developer-initiated district. Protection of the properties from the overland flows was necessary in order to receive development rights from the City. The costs associated with the maintenance of this district are passed onto the property owners, as they receive special and direct benefit that is distinguishable from the other property owners that are outside the boundary. There are 351 single-family homes within this boundary that receive this benefit. The total annual cost for maintenance is thirty-two thousand, three hundred and fifty- one dollars and sixty-seven cents ($32,351.67) for a total cost to each home of ninety-two dollars and seventeen cents ($92.17) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (DAY CANYON DRAINAGE BASIN) June 12, 2005 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, Administrative Services Director Attachm'ents: Resolution Annual Supplement to Final Engineer's Report Map -2- SOL,mO / qJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, previously undertook proceedings to authorize the levy and imposition of benefit assessments to pay for the annual drainage maintenance, including the removal of sediment and debris from the Day Canyon Channel improvements and basin, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 54703), said area of benefit being known and designated as DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 (the "Drainage Area"); and WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented to this City Council a Supplemental Report (the "Supplemental Report') to the Final Engineer's Report Drainage Area No. 91-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga setting forth a description of the proposed service, cost estimate and assessment schedule for fiscal year 2005-2006 (the "Final Engineer's Report"); and WHEREAS, at this time this City Council desires to determine the cost of providing authorized services to be financed by the levy of a benefit assessment for fiscal year 2005-2006 and to determine and impose such benefit assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the Supplemental Report is hereby approved and ordered to be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Said Supplemental Report generally consists of the following: A. A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived through the levy and collection of the benefit assessment; to the benefit assessment; C. A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 3:. That the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report is hereby adopted and has been utilized as the rate and method of apportionment of the benefit assessment to be levied in fiscal year 2005-2006. SECTION 4: That this City Council hereby determines and orders that the benefit assessments described in the Supplemental Report within the Drainage Area are hereby confirmed and levied for fiscal year 2005-2006. SECTION 5: That the above confirmed and levied benefit assessment for fiscal year 2004_ 2005 shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as general Cotmty property taxes are collected and all laws providing for the collection and enfomement of such County taxes shall be applicable to the collection and enfomement of these benefit assessments. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED AYES: day of June 2005. NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of June 2005. Executed this day of June 2005 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember L. Dennis Michael, Councilmember Sam Spagnolo, Cotmcilmember Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Debra Adams, City Clerk Joe O'Neil, City Engineer JUNE 2005 Resolution No. Page 4 ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Report Exhibit A - Description of Service Exhibit B - Cost Estimate Exhibit C - Assessment Schedule Map Resolution No. Page 5 AGENCY: PROJECT: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAiNAGE AREA NO. 91-2 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ANNUAL SUPPLEMENT TO FiNAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982 This Annual Supplement to the Final Engineer's Report (the "Annual Supplement") for City of Rancho Cucamonga Drainage Area No. 91-2 is hereby submitted consisting of the following documents, pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703. This Annual Supplement is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006. 1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE (Exhibit "A"): A description of the service proposed to be financed through revenue derived from the levy and collection of the annual benefit assessment. 2. COST ESTIMATE (Exhibit "B"): A listing of all costs and expenses for the next fiscal year, including incidental expenses. 3. BENEFIT ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (Exhibit "C"): The annual assessment schedule, setting forth the following: Annual Benefit Assessment: The amonnt of the proposed benefit assessment for each parcel. Description of Parcel: A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the benefit assessment, said parcel being described by the County Assessor's parcel number. Resolution No. Page 6 No benefit assessments shall be imposed or levied upon land owned by a Federal or State governmental agency and/or any other local agency. Any utility property and right-of-way shall be subject to assessment only to the extent that it is specifically benefited from the proposed services. Reference is made the Final Engineer's Report as incorporated in Resolution No. 91-331 for a description of the boundaries of the Drainage Area and each parcel therein and for the method of spreading the benefit assessment. Executed this day of June 2005, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA By:. Final approval, confirmation, and levy of the annual benefit assessment and all matters in the Annual Supplement was made on the day of June 2005, by adoption of Resolution No. by the City Council. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of said Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report was filed in the Office of the City Engineer and the City Clerk on the day of June 2005. CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Resolution No. Page 7 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE The properties within Drainage Area No. 91-2 are located within the boundaries of the Day Canyon Drainage Basin area. Protection of the properties within the district fi.om overland flows requires the construction of a 27+ acre-foot desilting basin and a 1,460+ linear foot concrete drainage channel. The channel improvements will intercept the overland flows prior to reaching the properties and carry the storm water runoff, sediment, trash, organic material, and related debris to a desilting basin. Each year the sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris that accumulates in the desilting basin and channel must be removed and transported to an approved spoils site. The services proposed to be financed fi.om the revenue derived from the levy and collections of the annual benefit assessment are as follows: A. Monthly on-site inspections of the desilting basin and channel. B. Bi-monthly weed abatement program for the desilting basin and channel. C. Removal of accumulated sediment, trash, organic material, and other related debris from the desilting basin and channel to an approved spoils site. This service is expected to be provided annually. During times of excessive rainfall, this service may be required more fi:equently. Cost of Annual Maintenance Desilting Basin Channel Subtotal Incidental Expenses City Administration Subtotal Total Annual Costs Contribution Balance to Assessment EXttlBIT B COST ESTIMATE FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 $22,500 $ 6,732 $29,232 $ 3,120 $ 3,120 $32,352 $0 $32,260 Resolution No. Page 8 EXHIBIT C ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE Resolution No. Page 9 WHEREAS, this City Council has previously, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 54703, formed Drainage Area No. 91-2 all in accordance with the provisions of said Act; and, WHEREAS, the Annual Supplement for Fiscal Year 2005-20065 consisting of certain documentation (including the amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel, a description of the parcel and a description of the service proposed to be provided) has now been prepared. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Engineer, by virtue of the power vested pursuant to said Act and by order of the legislative body, hereby makes and recommends the following benefit assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the service proposed to be financed through the levy of assessments and revenue derived for the fiscal year 2005-2006. Said costs and expenses are generally as follows: Cost of Maintenance Cost of Improvements Incidental Expenses Total Costs Contribution/Surplus Balance to Assessment $29,232 $ 0 $ 3,120 $32,352 $ o $32,352 I do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within the area of benefit in proportion to the estimated benefits received, and hereby further state as follows: A. The amount of benefit assessment imposed is specifically related to the benefit of the parcel, which will be derived from the provision of the service to be provided. B. The annual aggregate amount of the total benefit assessment does not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service. C. The revenue derived from the benefit assessment shall not be used to pay for the cost of any service other than the service for which the benefit assessment was levied. Resolution No. Page 10 The assessment parcels herein refer to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels, and said Roll shall govern for all details conceming the description of the lots or parcels. The net amount to be assessed upon the lands has been spread and apportioned by formula as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report in accordance with the benefits received from each parcel, and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance works of improvement. In the opinion of the undersigned, the benefit assessments have been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits to be received from the proposed work and services. Dated: CITY ENGINEER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT NUMBER 0225-451-01 to 35 0225-451-39 to 46, 49,50,53 0225-451-55 to 62, 64 0225-462-01 to 07 0225-462-12 to 17 0225-463-03, 06 to 33 0225-464-01 to 04, 06, 07 0225-464-19 to 30 0225-471-01 to 58 0225-481-01 to 42 0225-491-01 to 19 0225-561-01 to 34 0225-571-01 to 35 0225-581-01 to 38 0225-681-01 to 03 0225-681-05 to 11 Total PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 351 Residential Parcels $32,352.00 AMOUNT OF ASSESSMENT $32,352.00 [-' i ==~ ~= =~'= o~ <= <==Benefit Assessment District 91-2 ~'"-" I E - E ~_ E~ > ~ _ ~ Hillside R~ Wilson Ay Limits ,~ r~. = ,~., BAD 91-2 I 1.5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: June 1, 2005 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Peter M. Bryan, Fire Chief Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst II APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $66,149.00 AWARDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 2004), ADMINISTERED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES, INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1380000-4740 (GRANT INCOME); AND AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $440.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-5152 (COMPUTER SOF'rVVARE), $5,800.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-5200 (OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE), AND $59,909.00 INTO ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-5603 (CAPITAL OUTLAY- EQUIPMENT); AND APPROVAL FOR THE SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF MOTOROLA RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES FROM COMSERCO COMMUNICATIONS, OF RIVERSIDE, IN THE AMOUNT OF $59,452.07 FUNDED $434.81 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-5152, $911.42 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-5200, AND $59,452.07 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1380501-5603 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the acceptance of grant revenue in the amount of $66,149.00 awarded by the Department of Homeland Security (Homeland Security Grant 2004), administered by the State of California and San Bernardino County Office of Emergency Services, into Account No. 1380000-4740 (Grant Income); and authorization to appropriate $440.00 into Account No. 1380501-5152 (Computer Software), $5,800.00 into Account No. 1380501-5200 (Operations and Maintenance), and $59,909.00 into Account No. 1380501-5603 (Capital Outlay-Equipment); and approval for the single source purchase of Motorola radios and accessories from Comserco Communications, of Riverside, in the amount of $59,452.07 funded $434.81 from account no. 1380501-5152, $911.42 from account no. 1380501-5200, and $59,452.07 from account no. 1380501-5603. The grant is 100% funding with no matching funds required. Page 2 June t, 2005 Approval for Homeland Security Grant 2004 BACKGROUND The Fiscal Year 2004 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP '04) provides funds to enhance the capability of State and local units of government to prevent, deter, respond to, and recover from incidents of terrorism. The SHSP '04 grant funds will be used to purchase new radios and accessories for use in the newly built Emergency Operations Center. The District provided the equipment list and specifications to Purchasing along with a single source justification request. After review and approval, Purchasing obtained a current quote, based on a piggyback purchase on the County of Los Angeles contract, to include the various radios, and accessories with acceptable terms and conditions and represents the best price currently available. Purchases of this product are direct from Comserco, Motorola's Manufacturer Authorized Representative. Respectfully submitted, Fire Chief -2- .,RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION FOR PURCHASES $1,501 AND ABOVE The information below is provided in support of my Department requesting approval for a single/sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source. VENDOR: [ Comserco Communications I DATE: [5/25/2005 J COMMODITY/SERVICE: [ Motorola Radios Ik Accessories ] ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE: [ $60K J YOUR NAME: I Pamela Pane EXTENT OF MARKET [ None SEARCH CONDUCTED: I PRICE REASONABLENESS: [ LA County Contract Piggyback Pricing Does moving forward on this product/service further obligate the City to future similar contract actual arrangements? DEFINJ. ~ -ONS: SINGLE SOURCE - a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. SOLE SOURCE - a transaction with the ONLY business entity capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need. /nitial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most single/sole source products/services requested). Attach a memorandum containing complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry. Check One: [] THIS ZSA SINGLE SOURCE [] THIS ZSA SOLE SOURCE 1, [] REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item No. 3 must also be completed) 2. [] THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS OF ANOTHER NANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum) 3. [] THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN TI'EM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE SPECL~L[ZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. (Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application) 4. [] UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique features are and what benefit the City will accrue) 5. [] THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT STANDARDIZATION. (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request) 6. [] NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY, A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN ATTACHED MEMORANDUM. The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the service or material described in this single/sole source justification be authorized as a single/sole source of the service or material ~ * ~ ~ ~ PURCHASING DEPARTMENT * ~ * ~- * [~APPROVED [] APPROVED WITH COND~/t'~ON/S [] DISAPPROVED $1,so - APPROVED BY PURCHASING MANAGER: ~ DATE: $20~OOO AND ABOVE See comments above by Purchasing Division Attach to Council Request CITY COUNCIL ACTION: [ I DATE: R^NC CITY O CUCA?IONGA MANAGER'S OFFICE DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 1,2005 Mayor an/d'fvlembers of the City Council Pamela ~r~, Deputy City Manager Approval Of Professional Services Agreement with No Kill Solutions for Animal Services Consultation Services in the amount of $ 21,000 from Account No. 1001 104 5300. As a follow up to the May 18, 2005 Council meeting, City staff is working with Nathan Winograd, of No Kill Solutions, on a Professional Consultant Services Agreement. This Agreement will reflect the Council's direction to expand the scope of services that Mr. Winograd will provide the City, on the transition from a County contract to a municipally operated animal services program. It will replace the earlier Agreement (CO 05-032) that the Council had approved for Mr. Winograd that reflected a narrower scope of services. We anticipate that the Agreement will be finalized over the weekend. Staff will deliver the Agenda Staff Report and Professional Services Agreement to the Council on late Tuesday. I~AN HO CUCAHONGA CITY MANAGER*S OFFICE Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 1,2005 Mayo r a nd Mem b~Ff~ o,f~t~he/Off/y Cou n cil Pamela S. Easter~l~ty~ity Manager .Approval of Professional Services Agreement (CO 05-050) with No Kill Solutions for Animal Services Consultation Services in the amount of $ 21,000 from Account No. 1001 104 5300. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Agreement with No Kill Solutions, of San Clemente, California for an amount not to exceed $21,000 from Account No. 1001 104 5300. This includes $19,000 for professional services and $2,000 for expenses. This will replace the earlier Agreement with No Kill Solutions (CO 05-032) that the Council had previously approved that reflected a narrower Scope of Services. Background At the May 18, 2005 Council meeting, the Council expressed its interest in expanding the Scope of Services with Nathan Winograd, bf No Kill Solutions, to provide a transition plan from a County contracted service to a City operated program. The Scope of Services will continue to include Mr. Winograd's recommendations regarding the Animal Shelter achieving status as a No Kill Shelter, but eliminates the assessment of the.Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter. The revised Agreement between the City and No Kill Solutions is attached for your review and information. There are two attachments to the Agreement, including Exhibit A, the City's Revised Scope of Services, dated May 9, 2005 as well as Exhibit B which is the Consultant's Revised Proposal, dated May 17, 2005. The revised Scope of Services includes a study and preparation of a Transition Plan as well as a Final Report to address the transition of the Animal Services Program provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga from a County operated contract to a municipally operated program. As mentioned previously, Mr. Winograd will continue to include, in his work, the feasibility of th~ Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No Kill Shelter. Page 2 June 1, 2005 Agreement with No Kill Solutions Mr. Winograd's work will be done in two phases and is anticipated to begin in late June. The first phase, of approximately 30 days in length, will be the development of a written Transition Plan that will include the elements, timelines, and costs of the transition to a municipally operated Shelter. Included will be the perspective of the Program being a No Kill facility. It is anticipated that the Transition Plan will be presented to the City Council and staff at the end of July 2005. Phase II will be four to six months in length (time to begin from the signing of the Agreement in early June) and will culminate in a written Final Report and presentation to the City Council in the time period between late September to late November 2005. Phase II will include the various aspects of operating a Animal Shelter, including recommended service levels, staffing, job descriptions, equipment acquisition, systems, necessary facility modifications, insurance, use of volunteers, the various options of veterinarian, care, public educations and outside support services. The Final Report will also include the policies, procedures, protocols, all necessary ordinances, and legal documents that will be necessary to operate the shelter and control programs to ensure compliance with related State Law. Additionally, specifics regarding animal control services will be provided, including dispatching, personnel, canvassing, and licensing programs, vehicles, etc. The Final Report will also include the necessary cost information for the transition as well as annual operating costs, in order that the Council has complete understanding of the financial costs, including recommendations on revenues. The Scope of Services will also include researching local community contacts such as animal advocacy groups, veterinarians, and volunteers; and provide the City with an assessment of the effectiveness of, and potential for, local support of a municipally operated Animal Services program and No Kill Animal Shelter in order to assist the City in transition to a No Kill Status. Additionally, the Consultant will provide an objective and thorough analysis of the facility and costs of the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter operating as a No Kill Shelter, including: the specific definition of "No Kill" as it would relate to the City referring to the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter as "No Kill." This analysis will include the expected outcomes and goals as well as the measurements used to gauge effectiveness and success; establishment of policies, procedures and programs that would be required in order to achieve a No Kill Rancho Cucamonga Animal Shelter (including an assessment of the level of community support to achieve and sustain such); levels of services vs. cost, including identification of fiscal requirements necessary to achieve and sustain a No-Kill Animal Shelter in Rancho Cucamonga, identification of long-term financial requirements in addition to any "start up" or immediate costs, grant funding or other one-time funding opportunities as well as funding requirements for the future beyond grants, and identification of realistic opportunities for long-term grant or foundation funding; and proposed timeline for implementation of a plan to achieve a No Kill status at the Animal Shelter. Page 3 June 1, 2005 Agreement with No KillSolutions Finally, the consultant will provide assistance, as requested by the City, in the review of candidates for the Animal Services Director position, which will head up the City's program. This is a sole source contract based upon the fact that staff was unable to identify another consultant offering these specific services. An approved Sole Source Justification was submitted to the City Council in a previous Council Agenda memo discussing the retention of No Kill Solutions to provide professional consulting services. Cost of Services The cost of preparing the above mentioned services will be $19,000, plus expenses to the capped at a maximum of $2,000. The funding was previously appropriated and will come from Account No. 1001 104 5300. Attachments Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and No Kill Solutions Exhibit A The City's Revised Scope of Services, dated May 9, 2005 Exhibit B Consultant's Revised Proposal, dated May 17, 2005