The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995/10/18 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. October 18, 1995 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Rex Gutierrez, Mayor Pro Tern Paul Blanc, Cotmcihnen~ber James V. Curatalo, Cotmcihnember Diane Williams, Councilmen~ber Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda October 18, 1995 PAGE All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: A. CALL TO ORDER Alexander , Biane , Curatalo Gutierrez , and Williams__ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Proclamation to Margaret Hayes for her lifesaving efforts the Neighborhood Center. Presentation of Proclamation to the Etiwanda High School Marching Eagle Regiment designating them as our Good Will Ambassadors and congratulating them on being selected to march in the 1996 Tournament of Roses Parade. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. -State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items .are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: September 6, 1995 (Adjourned/Special Meeting) Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/27/95 and 10/4/95; and Payroll ending 9/21/95 for the total amount of $2,041,993.97. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of September 30, 1995. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Liquor Land 2, Fernand Bhnam Blat and Abraham Meida, 9255 Base Line Road, Unit E. 11 16 City Council Agenda October 18, 1995 PAGE 2 10. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Unnamed Business, Hiroshi and Kaye Domae, 6797 Carnelian Street. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General Eating Place for Empire Lakes Golf Course, General Dynamics Corporation, 11015 6th Street. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General Public Eating Place for Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, Gourmet Systems of California, Incorporated, 10709 Foothill Boulevard. Approval to reject the bid for the Hermosa Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, located from Fourth Street to Sixth Street, North of Sharon Circle to Eighth Street, and south of Devon Street to Foothill Boulevard. Approval of applications for Grant Funds from the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for the Metrolink Railway Station Beautification Project, and the Metrolink Corridor Beautification Project. RESOLUTION NO. 95-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT RESOLUTION NO. 95-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT Approval of an Application for funds from the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) Program for the Metrolink Railway Station Beautification Project. 18 20 22 24 26 29 30 31 City Council Agenda October 18, 1995 PAGE 11. 12. 14. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 95-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT FUNDS FOR THE METROLINK RAILWAY STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT Approval of appropriations for various Capital Improvement Project Funds for Fiscal Year 1995/96. Approval to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B . and Street Lighting Maintenance DistdCt Nos. 1 and 6 for MDR 95-10, located on the North side 9th Street, east of Helms Avenue, submitted by Peter S. Wald. RESOLUTION NO. 95-145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 95-10 Approval to purchase one (1) 3-axle combination 6x4, 56,000 GVWR, Water Tank/Dump Truck from Dieterich International Truck Sales, Incorporated, of Colton, California, in the amount of $123,078.26 to be funded 69.23% from Fund 72-4225-7045 and 30.77% from Fund 09-4637-7045. Approval to execute an Improvement Agreement Supplement and Improvement to a previously approved Improvement Agreement for Tract No. 14208, located on the North side of Base Line Road West of Alta Cuesta Drive, submitted by the Developer, Mr. Ralph G. Rittenhouse. RESOLUTION NO. 95-146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT FOR THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT OF TRACT NO. 14208 Approval to accept street improvements, release of bonds and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 13890-1 located on the north side of Highland Avenue, south of Banyan Street an west of Deer Creek Channel. Release: Faithful Performance Bond Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 966,000.00 96,600.00 33 34 36 38 41 43 46 47 City Council Agenda October 18, 1995 PAGE 4 16. RESOLUTION NO. 95-147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13890-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13738 located on the Southwest corner of Almond and Sapphire Streets. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 47,400.00 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Storm Drain) 58,800.00 48 49 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to change the land use district from "MOC" (Mixed Use Office/Commercial/Residential) to "CC" (Community Commercial) for 47.3 acres bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Rochester Avenue on the east, the future Poplar Drive and future Church Street on the north, and the future Orchard Avenue on the west and to "MH" (Medium High, 14-24 dwelling units per acre) for 19.2 acres of land bounded by the future Poplar Drive and future Church Street on the north, the future Orchard Avenue on the west, and the proposed Community Commercial designation on the south. The changes include amending portions of the text and various tables and graphic exhibits of the community plan to implement design features of the proposed land use designations - APN: 0227-151-18 and 24. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related Files: General Plan Amendment 95-01 B, Conditional Use Permit 95-11, and Parcel Map 14022. ORDINANCE NO. 550 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE MAP FROM "MIXED USE, OFFICE, COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL" TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR APPROXIMATELY 47.3 ACRES OF LAND AND TO MEDIUM HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 19.2 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL 50 City Council Agenda October 18, 1995 PAGE BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, ROCHESTER AVENUE ON THE EAST, THE FUTURE POPLAR DRIVE AND FUTURE CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND THE FUTURE ORCHARD AVENUE ON THE WEST, AND TO MAKE CHANGES TO PORTIONS OF THE TEXT AND GRAPHIC EXHIBITS OF THE COMMUNITY PLAN TO IMPLEMENT DESIGN FEATURES OF THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS -APN: 0227-151-18 AND 24. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF THE PROPOSED OFF-SITE SALE OF BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SALE OF GIFT BASKETS FOR A CRAFT AND GIFT RETAIL STORE, THE WILD GRAPE, LOCATED AT 8057 AND 8916 FOOTHILL BLVD RESOLUTION NO. 95-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE OFF-SITE SALE OF BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SALE OF GIFT BASKETS FOR A CRAFT AND GIFT RETAIL STORE, THE WILD GRAPE, LOCATED AT 8057 AND 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 87 97 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No items submitted. City Council Agenda October 18, 1995 PAGE 6 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE FROM ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE (Oral Report) UPDATE BY MARKS CABLEVISION ON STATUS OF CABLE 'IV IN THE CITY J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes · per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6 TO GIVE ROBERT DOMINGUEZ, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 12, 1995, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. September 6, 1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JOINT CITY COUNCIL & PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned/Special Meetin.q A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned/special joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Planning Commission was held on Wednesday, September 6, 1995 in the Tri-Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 4:40 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Planning Commissioners: E. David Barker, Heinz Lumpp, Larry McNiel (arrived at 4:45 p.m.), and John Melcher. Absent was Commissioner: Peter Tolstoy Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager; Olen Jones, Sr. Redevelopment Analyst; Leanne Smothers, Redevelopment Analyst; Jan Reynolds, Assistant Redevelopment Analyst; Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Brad Ruller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Alan Warren, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Chief Dennis Michael and Fire Marshal Ralph Crane, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; James C. Frost, City Treasurer; Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION B1. DISCUSSION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE SITE LOCATION PROCESS B2. DISCUSSION OF SITE LOCATION PERSPECTIVE - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this is a meeting including both the City Council and the Planning Commission. He stated the City is currently involved in two studies - one being the commercial land use component and the other is economic development and marketing strategy. He stated one of the consultants present tonight would inform the Council/Commission about the primary vocabulary of economic development and to talk about what economic development is and is not, and what are the concepts for economic development for a community. He stated this meeting is not to talk about what is in the study or what they are working on, because it would be presented at a future meeting. He introduced Linda Daniels who would give some introductory comments and introduce the consultants with PHH Fantus. City Council/Planning Commission Joint Meeting September 6, 1995 Page 2 Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Manager, stated that PHH Fantus was hired back in June of 1995 through an agreement and that they are not in their preliminary data collection stage. She stated Carlton Schwab and Tom Bartkoski were representing PHH Fantus tonight. She turned the meeting over to Carlton Schwab. Carlton Schwab stated they would focus on economic development and what it means to various levels of government. He gave background information on PHH Fantus. He stated they are currently gathering information on the strengths of Rancho Cucamonga as a place to do business and ways to help maintain economic development in the City. He and Tom Badkoski continued with their presentation by showing slides, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's office. John Melcher, Planning Commissioner, asked why businesses might not want to come to Rancho Cucamonga. Carlton Schwab stated because of such things as fires, earthquakes, floods, and the fact that Rancho Cucamonga isn't exactly as well known as Los Angeles. Councilmember Gutierrez asked what can Rancho Cucamonga do to attract business to the City when there are other neighboring communities that have problems that might detract a new business from coming here, i.e., San Bernardino with all of their crime etc. Carlton Schwab stated the City needed to focus its efforts on our unique quality of life and other attributes to attract businesses. He felt the City needed to establish itself as the quality in the Inland Empire. Mayor Alexander expressed his concern of businesses that do not want to stay in California or do not want tO move here and that something should be done to attract them to move or stay in Rancho Cucamonga. Heinz Lumpp, Planning Commissioner, inquired that based on the information the consultants now have, where do they rank Rancho Cucamonga. Carlton Schwab stated very high regionally. He added that things do not happen overnight and that it takes time. He stated Rancho Cucamonga is not known nationally or internationally. He stated generally what they see for Rancho Cucamonga is a progressive City. Councilmember Gutierrez felt we needed to keep businesses in Rancho Cucamonga so that we can keep our residents here, allowing them to have a better quality of life. Mayor Alexander stated everyone is looking forward to the next time they all meet to hear more about this. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. City Council/Planning Commisison Joint Meeting September 6, 1995 Page 3 D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Gutjerrez, seconded by Biane to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved by the Planning Commission: September 27, 1995 Approved by the City Council: * %. ~l&.~ I,.-~,~ tLk,'~VJ ..I V V ~ ¢ V ~ ~V V I-I % eZ O. .J 2: I.- ( (.)i-I ~ ,( O ( Z 0 w ") w e,, Z · H ( ~ (-) (.) 0 k.~JQk~uq~O UJN I ,I (9 "'~ull...Z a-w I,- (~J,:TI.-N / Z · I.- w I_,~ o~i~. .J ),. ix I,- ~,) N u: k,t C:) )-I.,,10 J t4 · I,,4 (,) 14u,') z-, ,I w I--Z I&l I-- ~ ~l-I ~ IJ (,)~,) er ,fir 0_1 },* t-i "sO} uj Oe, ZI Ur~ m~,,}), %.,()-IZHl-,I.-.kl I,-uJ eOZZ J_~, iLi.~tu ~ooooooo oo oo oooooo oo~~~ O0 U C3 gJ x ~ · Ilee$leleeeleee$leeeeeleelele Z ZZ ~Z~Z~Z~ ~ZZZZ~ZZ Z ~ZZZ I I I I ,,, · ,..ul N I su I l- I r,, I Z I :::) I I 0 · Z · OC · QC · 4E I I I I I I I I · Z I 0 I I- I I s. I fl I d I I I I I · tLt I · Q )' \ r"' Z ..I V~ (J :Z Z O.ZQ.I-- s, I-- :):):)uJC)C)C)V~JOO,~ZC)ZGtU i,U,YI-- u utnt~ ,J Z C:~ (JZ~ I-. rj~ .J Z · J \ 4~ 0 04,4 ? · ~ H , % O~ Z 3: · _1 ~-~ /O 10/11/1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PM - 1 PORTFOLIO MASTER SIMiARY CITY SEI'YEMBER 30, 1995 CASH AVERAGE ---YIELD TO MATURITY--- PERCENT OF AVERAGE DAYS TO 360 365 INVESTMENTS BO(I VALUE PORTFOLIO TE~I MATURITY EQUIVALENT EQUIVALENT Certificates of Deposit - Bank ...............$ Local Agency Investment Funds ................$ Federal Agency Issues - Coupon ...............$ Treasury Securities - Coupon .................$ Mortgaqe Backed Securities ...................$ Small Bus. Adm/Miscellane~us Agency ..........$ 12,306,789.82 24.64 510 354 6.264 6.351 9,457,955.20 18.94 1 1 5.839 5.920 26,450,915.63 52.96 1,117 893 7.065 7.164 272,845.00 0.55 1,180 700 6.569 6.660 352,538.64 0.71 6,418 3,413 8.930 9.054 1,101,562.50 2.21 9,131 5,776 8.184 8.298 TOTAL IIfV'ESTNENTS and AVIH{AGES .............$ 49,942,606.79 100.00% 970 716 6.671% 6.763% CASH Passhook/Checking Accounts ...................$ 891,832.84 1.973 2.000 (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Purchase .................$ 20,728.36 fOTAL CASH aid PURCHASE INTEREST .............$ 912,561.20 TOTAL CASH and INVESTMENTS .................$ 50,855,167.99 NON]q{ ENDING FISCAL ]~)TAL EAPJilNGS SEPTEMBER 30 YEAR TO DATE Current Year $ 270,804.56 $ 855,304.58 Afi~RAGE DAILY BtJANCE EFFECTIVE RATE OF RETURN $ 51,024,394.37 $ 52,960,269.70 6.461 6.411 Io/Io,-/95 DATE I ~ I certify that this report accurately reflects all agency pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted August 16, 1995. A copy of this investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Department. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet next menth's estimated expenditures. // 10/11/1995 CITY OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA IN - 2 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INVESTMENTS CITY SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 CASH INVESTMENT AVERAGE PURCHASE STATED --= YTM --- MATURITY DAYS NUMBER ISSUER BALANCE DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK 00937 FtX)THIIJ. INDEP BANK 04/06/95 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6.950 6.950 7.047 04/09/97 556 00918 GREAT WESTERN 11/15/94 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.000 6.000 6.083 11/27/95 57 00927 GREAT WESTERN 01/25/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.900 6.900 6.996 01/25/96 116 00930 GREAT WESTERN 02/15/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.900 6.900 6.996 08/16/96 320 00931 GREAT WESTERN 03/01/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.250 6.250 6.337 03/04/96 155 00951 GREAT WESTERN 06/07/95 1,791,789.82 1,791,789.82 1,791,789.82 5.500 5.500 5.576 11/30/95 60 00955 GREAT WESTERN 08/21/95 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 5.650 5.650 5.728 08/21/96 325 00924 SAi~WA 12/28/94 1,O00,(N)O.O0 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 7.250 7.250 7.351 12/27/96 453 00933 SAMWA 02/23/95 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 6.920 6.920 7.016 02/24/97 512 00945 SANWA 05/02/95 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6.410 6.410 6.499 05/02/97 579 00954 SANWA 07/31/95 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 5.480 5.480 5.556 07/30/96 303 SUBTC)TALSalx:IAVEP, AGES 12,706,789.82 12,306,789.82 12,306,789.82 12,306,789.82 6.264 6.351 354 //)CAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUNDS 00005 LOCAL AGEMCY INVST FUND 00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND SUBTOTALS and AVERAGES 8,207,955.20 8,344,955.20 8,344,955.20 8,344,955.20 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 1,113,000.00 9,457,955.20 9,457,955.20 9,457,955.20 5.910 5.829 5.910 1 5.997 5.915 5.997 1 5.839 5.920 1 FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON 00895 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 04/29/94 00897 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 05/05/94 00922 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/19/94 00925 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 12/28/94 00939 FEDEI~ALHOIiE LOAN BANK 04/06/95 00940 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 04/06/95 00943 FEDERAL HONE LOAN BAN I[ 04/26/95 00952 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 06/08/95 00956 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 08/23/95 00938 00949 00921 00926 00935 00947 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CO 04/06/95 FEDERAL HONE LOAN MORTG. CO 05/16/95 FEDERAL MATL NTG ASSN 12/21/94 FEDERAL MATE MTG ASSN 12/29/94 FEDERAL MATE MTG ASSN 03/22/95 FEDERAL MATE M'PG ASSM 05/08/95 and AVERAGES 26,450,915.63 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,996,250.00 2,000,000.00 1,996,250.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,065)134.38 1,090,000.00 1,065,134.38 965,156.25 1,000,000.00 965,156.25 942,968.75 1,000,000.00 942,968.75 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,002,031.25 1,000,000.00 1,002,031.25 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 1,981,250.00 2,000,000.00 1,981,250.00 1,998,125.00 2,000,000.00 1,998,125.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 26,450,915.63 26,450,915.63 26,590,000.00 5.850 5.770 5.850 04/29/96 211 5.850 5.869 5.951 04/29/96 211 8.030 8.030 8.142 12/19/97 810 6.360 7.789 7.898 09/19/96 354 4.570 6.638 6.730 12/30/96 456 5.240 7.030 7.127 11/30/98 1,156 8.045 8.045 8.157 04/26/00 1,669 6.830 6.830 6.925 06/08/98 981 7.140 7.140 7.239 08/23/00 1,788 7.420 7.226 7.326 09/23/99 1,453 7.050 7.050 7.148 05/15/98 957 7.050 7.564 7.669 10/10/96 375 7.700 7.752 7.859 12/10/96 436 7.010 7.010 7.107 03/21/97 537 7.270 7.270 7.371 05/08/00 1,681 7.065 7.164 893 10/11/1995 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA PM - 3 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAILS - INV]~TNENTS CITY SEPT]~NBER 30, 1995 CASH INVESTMENT AVERAGE PURCRASE STATED ---YTN--- MATURITY DAYS NUNBEN ISSUER BALANCE DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT TREASURY SECURITIES - COUPON 00903 TREASURY NOTE AVERAGES 06/08/94 272,845.00 277,000.00 272,845.00 6.141 6.569 6.660 08/31/97 700 272,845.00 NORTGAGE RACKED SECURITIES 00071 FEDERAL HONE LOAN BANK 02/23/87 00203 FEDERAL RATL I~ ASSN 09/21/87 00002 GOVERN)lENT NATIONAL NORTG A 07/01/87 00<)69 GOVIHLNIdENT NATIONAL NOETG A 07/01/87 S~TOTALS and AVERAGES 354,705.94 SMALL BUS. AI]4~ISCELLANEOUS AGENCY 00004 SMALL BUSINESS AI]4IN 07/25/86 AVEPAGES 1,101,562.50 64,108.19 65,814.44 442,907.10 8.000 137,287.67 148,619.94 612,753.80 8.500 125,749.88 127,54)3.03 663,389.28 8.500 25,394.90 24,894.10 84,710.58 9.0(0) 352,538.64 1,803,760.76 366,831.53 8.336 8.452 01/01/02 2,284 9.557 9.689 09/01/10 5,449 8.631 8.75103/15/01 2,033 8.515 8.634 03/15/01 1,992 8.930 9.054 3,413 1,101,562.50 1,000,000.00 1,085,142.39 9.125 8.184 8.298 07/25/11 5,776 TOTAL INVESTMENTS and AVG. $ 49,942,6~.79 51,357,408.80 49,094,774.~ 49,998,576.55 6.671% 6.763t 716 /3 10/11/1995 CITY OF RANClIO CUCANONGA 1~ - INVESTMEET PORTFOLIO DETAIL~ - CASH CI~ SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 CASH INVESTMENT AVERAGE PURCHASE STATED '--TIN-'- MATURITY DAYS NUMBER ISSUER BALANCE DATE BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE RATE 360 365 DATE TO MAT CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS 00180 BANK OF AldERICA AVEPAGES 1,929,620.28 Accrued Interest at Purchase TOTAL CASH TOTAL CASH and INVESTMENTS 891,832.84 2.000 1.973 2.000 20,728.36 $ 912,561.20 $ 51,024,394.37 50,855,167.99 10/11/1995 CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA PM - 5 PORTPOLIOMASTER INVESTMENT ACTIVITY BY TYPE CITY SEPT~BER 1, 1995 - SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 CASH STATED TRANSACTION PURCHASES SALES/MATURITIES TYPE INVESTMENT # ISSUER RATE DATE OR DEPOSITS OR WITHDRAWALS BALANCE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT - BANK 00936 GREAT WESTERN BEGINNING BALAMCE: 12,806,789.82 5.800 09/25/1995 500,000.00 12,306,789.82 LOCAL AGENCY INVVESTMENT FUNDS (Monthly Summary) 00005 LOCx/~ AGENCY INVST FUND 5.910 00804 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND 5.997 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,500,000.00 0.00 7,957,955.20 9,457,955.20 CHECKING/SAVINGS ACCOUNTS (Monthly Summary) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,934,840.58 3,378,000.00 2,334,992.26 891,832.84 FEDERAL AGENCY ISSUES - COUPON BEGINNING BALANCE: 26,450,915.63 26,450,915.63 TREASURY SECURITIES - COUPON BEGINNING BALANCE: 272,845.00 272,845.00 NOR[GAGE BACKED SECURITIES 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAM BANK 8.000 00203 FEDERAL NATL MTGASSN 8.500 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL NORwIG ASSN 8.500 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL NORTG ASSN 9.000 SUBTOTALS and ENDING BALANCE BEGINNING BALANCE: 09/15/95 1,835.93 09/25/95 669.54 09/20/95 1,182.83 09/12/95 70.29 356,297.23 0.00 3,758.59 352,538.64 SMALL BUS. ADM/MISCELLANEOUS AGENCY TOTALS BEGINNING BALANCE:$ BEGINNING BALANCE: 1,101,562.50 1,101,562.50 51,281,357.64 3,434,840.58 3,881,758.59 50,834,439.63 TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 4505 Allstate Drive, Suite 102 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 7824400 HPPLICflTII]N FOB ~LCOHI]L BEHEBriBE LII:2ENSE{S) File Number ............ 312744 % Receipt Number ......... 1054038 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 9--19--95 Issued Date RIVERSIDE LIQUOR LAND 2 9255 BASELINE RD UNIT E RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA SAN BERNARDINO 91730 MEIDA ABRAHAM 256677 DISTRIC'7 SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? ff premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: License TYPe Transaction TVDe Fee TYPe Master Duo Date Fee 1.21 OFF-SALE GENERAL 2.21 OFF-SALE GENERAL 3. NA NO LICENSE TYPE 4.30 TEMPORARY RETAIL Have you ever been convicted of a-felony? NO PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 SEP 19,1995 $1274.00 ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 SEP 19,1995 $446.00 STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0 SEP 19,1995 $39.00 P TEMPORARY PERMIT NA YES 0 SEP 19,1995 $100.00 TOTAL $1859.00 Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Contml Act, orregulations ofthe depa~mentpeHaining ~ the Act? YES Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall b~. '~emed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed pret.. will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisiow~ the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date SEP 19,1995 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (1) He is an applican, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation. named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf: (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant% business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer ~pplicaOon or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the p-~yment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer .:pplication may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department. . Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) ]BLAT FERNAND BHNA '~ -,,,"',~:~' IMEIDA ABRAHAM ABC 211 (9/93) RECEIVED , , rY OF ,NCHO CUCAMC~k,t-,. RA.rv C; , ~;; --:.~. . AUG g 8 1995 ~PPLIC~TION FOB RLCOHOL BEUE!tflGE LICENSE[S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 4505 Allstate Drive, Suite 102 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 7824400 File Number ............ 312009 Receipt Number ......... 1049855 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 8--25--95 Issued Date RIVERSIDE 6797 CARNELIAN ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO CA 91701 11765 RAPALLO DR RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA' 91701 Transaction TYPe Fee Type Master DUD Date Fee D[STRIC'r SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Addmess: (If different from premise address) ffpremise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: Licsns~ Tv~ 1. 41 ON-S~LE BEER AND W ORIGINAL NA YES 0 AUG 25,1995 $300.00 : 2. 41 ON-SALE BEER AND W ANNUAL FEE ETA YES 0 AUG 25,1995 $205.00 : 3. NA NO LICEI~SE TYPE STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0 AUG 25,1995 $78.00 : TOtPAL $583.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisionZs ~f the Alcohoiic Beverage ConL,'o[ convicted of a felony? NO Control Act, or regulations of the department pertaining to the Act? NO Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an ammlm~nt which shall be deemexl part of this application. Applicant ~ (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed pmrnise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause o.r permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County0f SAN BERNARDINO Date AUG 25;1995 Umler pe~ity of perjury. esch penon whose signmm~ sR~4n below. certifies and rays: (I) He is u spplic~m. or one of the 'cmts, spplic~n: corporstion. named in ~e fmeSoin$ applic~ion. duly authorized to ~ this q~lic~ion on :u belnlf; (2) th,.t ~ent~ msd or an executive officer of r~e tl~ foregoinS and Imows the con~n-, ~n~of and thai e~ch of the above smlements u~ein n~de nt~ Irue: (3) I1~ no penon o&et thsn the spplicnnt or q>plicanu his rely direct or indimc~ iraernst in the Delmtunen: or to gain or establish · p~ference to or for any creditor or nnaemr or mmne~ud or injure any creditor oTu~sferon. (5) th:u the nnsfor application may be withdawn by eimer ~e nt~licnm or the licensee with no ~sultinS liability to the Depetunem. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) [DOMAE . , ~ RECEIVED AUG 3 0 1995 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division ABC 211 (9/93) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Comml 4505 Allstate Drive, Suite 102 Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 782 d~.00 CALI!OINIA APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE{S), DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Numlzr and Street City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? Type of license Transferor's names/license: License Tvne ' File Number ............ 312148 Receipt Number ......... 1050620 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 8--31--95 Issued Date WheD Trfd RIVERSIDE EMPIRE LAKES GOLF COURSE 11015 6TH ST RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES CA 91730 COLLINS RICHARD G 201744 Transaction Type Fee TYPe Master DUD 1.47 ON-SALE GENERAL EA PERSON TO PERSON TRAMS P40 YES 0 AUG 30,1995 $1250.00 : 2.47 ON-SALE GENERAL EA ANNUAL FER P40 YES 0 AUG 30,1995 $695.00: 3.47 ON-SAL]{ GENERAL EA PREMISE TO PREMISE TRA P40 YES 0 AUG 30,1995' $100.00: 4. NA NO LICENSE TYPE STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0 AUG 30,1995' $234.00: 5. NA NO LICENSE TYPE FEDERAL FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0 AUG 30,1995 $144.00 : TOTKI, $2423. O0 Have you ever been Ha~e you ever violated ar.y provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a felony? NO Control Act, or rggulations of the department pertaining to the Act7 NO Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attadunent which s|vdl be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cam or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act STATE OF CAL~ORN/A County of SAN BERNARDINO Date AUG 30,1995 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signatu~ akopears below. certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant or one of the applicantk or an executive officer of tl~ applicant cor~oK named in the foregoing application, duly anthorizst to nudz this appUcmioa on its behalf; (2) that be has read the foregoing and knows the concerns then:of and that eac~ of ~ above sta~mcnts Ibe~in made at~ roe; (3) Lhat no penon oen. Ihan the licant cx applicants has any di~ct or indirect in~est in · e s~plicant or sppUcsnt's business to be conducted under tl~ license(s) for which this spplic~ioa is m~; (4?ths/t!~ u'nnsfor application or proposed ~ is not susde to satisfy the [~ymem of · losn or to fulfill an agreement ealn~d into more this ' (90) dlys pt~:ediq the cia o~ which ~e transfer applicstion is filled with be witbdnwn by either the ap~iicam ot the licerace with no resulting liability to the Dclnrdnent, Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s)~~__/~_ ~ I G N RAL DYNAM/CS CORPORATION I 8ign by: Iff,0BA~, P, dmu-d A./Sec. Attached: 231 i 227 RECEIVED ,,ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~' CITY CL==w SEP 0 5 1995 ABC 2 ! 1 (993) EZZZZ:_'ZZZZZZ Z;ZZ'! "'~~ ~ · 2 . /! De net detach---Return all eepiel APPLICAT|0H FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Contro~ 1901 Broadway RiversDale Sacramento, Colif. 95818 The undersigned hereby applies for licenses de,cribed as follows: 2. NA,~E(S) OF APPLICANT(S) GOURMET SYSTEMS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (P-12) 4. Nam of Bu~ine s Ap~bee s ~eighborhood Grill & Bar 5. Location of Business--Number and Street De Not Write Above rhij Line--For Heedqvarlers Offlce Only I. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO. 312512 RECEIPT NO. On Sale General 1052832 GEOGRAPHICAL Public Eating Place CODE 3615 Date Issued Temp. Permit Applied under Sac. 24044 Effective Date: W Hen trfP Effective Dole: 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE LIC. TYPE $ Per to Per t~f. 1250.00 47 Pre mto Pre m trf. 100.00 47 Annual Fee 695.00 47 10709 Foothill Blvd City and Zip Code County Rancho Cucamonga 91730 San Bernardino 6. If Premises Licensed, Show Type of License Nb 8. Mailing Address (if differenl from 5)-Number and Sireel 4551 W. 107th St., Suite 100, Over]and Park, KS 9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? $ TOTAL 2045.00 7. Are Premises Inside City Limits? Yes (Temp) (Perre) 66207 P erm ]0. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcohollc Beverage Conlrol Act or regulations of the Department per- lajning to the Act? I 1. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. 12. Applicant agrees (a) lhal any manager employed in on-sale licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a llcensee, and (b] thai he will hal violate or cause or permit Io be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. 13. STATE OF ~/meeee,~ County of ............................................................... APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 1.5. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of ...................................... Dale 16. Name(s) of Licensee(s) 17. S~gnature(s) of Licensee(s) 18. License Number(s) SEE ATTACHED 231 FOR SIGNATURE (NANOPOULOS, Konstantine A) 47-269539 BY: BOWLICK, Annette/Executric) 19. Locatio Number and Street City and Zip Code County 53g Dart Canyon Rd., Crestliue, CA 92325 San Bernardino Do Not Write Below This Line; For Department Use On41 Attached: [:Z Recorded notice, [] Fiduciary papers, [] .......... A_B_g__2_3_l__~__n_q._t~:i__'_e_s_ ................ COMES MA,LEO ............. 9=3_2_=9_5 ..................... [] R ..... l: Fee of .... ~3_._C~ia at .......... _R_iy_e___~___e_ ........ Offi ....... ~_--_1_2_-__9_5_ ......Receipt No ........ _1_0_?_2_6__~_0_ ...... Z ~ 0 - O. J:2 --~ 0 ~2~1-- DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 18, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer REJECT THE BID FOR THE HERMOSA AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, LOCATED FROM FOURTH STREET TO SIXTH STREET; NORTH OF SHARON CIRCLE TO EIGHTH STREET AND SOUTH OF DEVON STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council reject the bid, without prejudice, for the Hermosa Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation as being non-responsive to the needs of the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Pursuant to previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 26, 1995, for the subject project. Only one bid was received and staff found that the bid received exceeded the Engineer's Estimate by a substantial amount as follows. Engineer's Estimate Bid $209,000.00 $243,000.00 Therefore, it is recommended that the bid be rejected. Staff will be requesting authorization to re- advertise at a later date, after reviewing the budget to determine if this project can be re-advertised as is. Respectfully submitted, WJO:LRB:Iy Attachment 0 0 0 0 0 z u,i <0 on, I- =0z c}n-i-u One; z:u-> z>-n_ d~ ._.l q.) ,--, -'-':~ EE 0 ~ ,,_, C)_ C). c~ -'-- 00000000 ~0~0~ 0000000 oe~e~oo ....... ~o~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 18, 1995 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Laura Bonaccorsi, Landscape Designer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR THE METROLINK RAILWAY STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, AND THE METROLINK CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolutions approving grant applications through the State-funded Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation (EEM) program. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Applications for the EEM grants are due and staff is recommending two projects for funding. Metrolink Station Beauti~cation: The project, Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Railway Station Beauti~cation, entails landscaping of the three acre parcel directly north of the new Metrolink Station. The enhancement would also include expanded pedestrian plaTas, featuring cultural exhibits of art or local history. The EEM program encourages matching funds from other sources such as Intermodal Surface Transportation Enhancement Act (ISTEA) funds. The application for this project is therefore accompanied on .tonight's agenda by and ISTEA project application. Should both applications be successful, project costs to the City would be modest. Estimated project construction costs are $475,000.00. Requested funding from the EEM grant is $75,000.00, with the ISTEA application addressing the remaining $400,000.00. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT METROLINK BEAUTIFICATION October 18, 1995 Page 2 Metrolink Railway Corridor Beauti~cation: This project is aimed at providing naturalized planrings (plant materials which can live off of rainfall once established) within or adjacent to the Metrolink corridor. Trees, shrubs, rock and mulch are the design elements to be employed where opportunities exist between Archibald and Haven Avenues, and adjacent to the Empire Lakes Golf Course. This is the first phase of what will be an on-going effort to beautify the Metrolink Corridor. Requested EEM funding for this project is $92,000.00. Respectfully submitted, William J. O~Neil X]v City Engineer Attachments WJO:LB:sd ©7 1 METROLINK CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION .JkT.& SeF. C "jr CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO 'CUCAMONGA EEM GRANT APPLICATIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Califomia has enacted AB 471 (Chapter 106 of the Statutes of 1989), which is intended to provide $10 million annually for a period of 10 years for grant funds to local, state and federal agencies and nonprofit entities for projects to enhance and mitigate the environmental impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities; and WHEREAS, the Resources Agency has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing grant proposals and is required to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of recommended projects from which the grant recipients will be selected; and WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the Resources Agency require a resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicant's governing body before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the environmental enhancement and mitigation project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA: 1. Approves the filing of an application for the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for grant assistance. 2. Certifies that said applicant will make adequate provisions for operation and maintenance of the project. Appoints William Joseph O'Neil, City Engineer, as agent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT-AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Califomia has enacted AB 471 (Chapter 106 of the Statutes of 1989), which is intended to provide $10 million annually for a period of 10 years for grant funds to local, state and federal agencies and nonprofit entities for projects to enhance and mitigate the environmental impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities; and WHEREAS, the Resources Agency has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing grant proposals and is required to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of recommended projects from which the grant recipients will be selected; and WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the Resources Agency require a resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicant's governing body before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the environmental enhancement and mitigation project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA: 1. Approves the filing of an application for the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for grant assistance. 2. Certifies that said applicant will make adequate provisions for operation and maintenance of the project. Appoints William Joseph O'Neil, City Engineer, as agent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 18, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Laura Bonaccorsi, Landscape Designer APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FROM THE INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT (ISTEA) PROGRAM FOR THE METROLINK RAILWAY STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution approving an application for funds for the Transportation Enhancement Activities Program through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Applications for ISTEA funding are due and staff is recommending that the 3 acre site on the north side of the City's Metrolink Station be improved through this program. Previous grant application reports to the City Council have identified the project as Art-Park and Metro-Park. The project now is being referred to as a Metrolink Station Beauti~cation project. The enhancement of the station is intended to provide a 3-acre traveler's "oasis", a place for Metrolink users to stretch their legs and enjoy some ofRancho Cucamonga through cultural exhibits such as art or interpretive local history elements. These features would be set amidst attractive landscaping that would screen objectionable views and provide a windbreak for station users. ISTEA funds are a reimbursable program, with potentially a majority of the project costs reimbursed by Federal Aid Funds. Matching funds are required and may be in the form of other fund assistance programs such as the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation (EEM) grant for the same project, also on the agenda for City Couneirs approval. Should both applications be successful, project costs to the City would be modest. Estimated project cost is $475,000.00. ISTEA funding requested is approximately $400,000.00, with the EEM application addressing the remaining $75,000.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LB:dlw CiTY HALL C3'i'Y OF ;:tANCHC~ .G-L3C~'MONGA ISTEA FUNDS APPLICATION NTS ~ RESOLUTION NO. ~__...~ "[ q q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR lITERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT FUNDS FOR THE METROLINK RAILWAY STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT. WHEREAS, the United States Congress has enacted the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, which is intended to provide over $200 million in federal dollars over a 6 year period as matching funds to local, state and federal agencies and nonprofit entities for transportation enhancement activities; and WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals and is required to submit the Califomia Transportation Commission a list of recommended projects from which the recipients will be selected; and WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the Califomia Department of Transportation resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicants goveming body before submission of said application to the Califomia Transportation Commission and the State of Califomia, and WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of Califomia to carry out the transportation enhancement activities project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMIlE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Approves as co-sponsor with Caltrans District 8, the County of San Bemardino, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and SANBAG as the lead agency the filing of an application for the Transportation Enhancement Activities Program for consideration for funding; SECTION 2. Appoints William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, as agent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including but not limited to application, agreements, amendments, payment requests, and so on; which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. SECTION 3. Supports the Metrolink Railway Station Beauti~cation Project. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this resolution. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 18, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Joseph E. Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR VARIOUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the appropriations from Fund Balance for the Capital Projects for FY 95/96 per the attached list. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The budget was approved by City Council in June 1995. Since that time, final payment of Capital Projects which were coordinated with AT & SF Railroad and Cal Trans were received and are now due for final payment. These projects were completed several years ago and any remaining funds for these projects were returned to Fund Balance at that time. In addition, two new computers with software are needed for use with the Pavement Management System and processing ongoing Traffic Reports. Finally, two new small Capital Projects were added for public safety purposes along with funds for updating the City Wide Traffic Model. Attached is a list of projects and their respective funding source(s) for which staff is requesting funding for. These additional appropriations are from fund balances and as such will not impact any projects already adopted by City Council in FY 95/96. Respectfully submitted, Willliam J. O'Neil (3LT~City Engineer WJO:dlw Attachment FY 95/96 APPROPRIATIONS ACCOUNT PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPROPRIATION 09-4637-9211 09-4637-8607 21-4647-7043 22-4637-3900 22-4637-7044 22-4637-xxxx 22-4637-8851 32-4637-9109 32-4637-9530 32-4637-9531 Rt. Turn @ Base Line & Archibald Ave. Final Pymt. MWD @ Milliken Grade Separation Final Pymt. Capital Outlay/Buildings-Neighborhood Center Sign Software for Pavement Management and Traffic Div. Hardware for Pavement Management and Traffic Div. AT & SFRR Crossing @ 7th Street Final Pymt. AT & SFRR Crossing @ Haven Ave. Final Pymt. Traffic Control Inventory and City Wide Model Update Almond St~ w/o Sapphire St.-Drainage Improvements Victoria St. Improvements from Hermosa to Teak $1 $5 $7 $3 $7 $45 $149 $7 $30 $5 000.00 000.00 000.00 180.00 000.00 900.00 070.00 000.00 000.00 000.00 TOTAL $260,150.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: October 18, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 95-10, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE 9TH STREET EAST OF HELMS AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PETER S. WALD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for MDR 95-10. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS MDR 95-10, located on the north side of 9th Street east of Helms Avenue, is required to fulfill certain conditions of approval along with the normal processing. As part of those conditions the Developer is required to have the project annexed into the appropriate lighting and landscape maintenance districts. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form has been received from the Developer and is on file in the City Clerk's office. Attached is the Resolution for adoption by the City Council to complete the proposed annexation. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil ~¢'City Engineer WJO:SM:dlw Attachments City of Rancho Cucamonga 9498 Ninth Street, APN 209-021-22 Vicinity Map 1 III ARRO\ V, ITI 91F parcels ~7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 95-10 (APN: 209-021-22) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all tree and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 APH 209-021-22 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO MDR 95-10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~.×,~z~ "~" EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: MDR 95-10 (APN: 209-021-22) STREET LIGHTS: Dist. S1 S6 5800L NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16.000L 22.000L 27.500L LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.S.F. L3B Turf Non-Turf Trees S.F. S .F. Ea. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District Parcel Acres S 1 S6 L3B N/A 2.51 5.02 2.51 2.51 Annexation Date: October 18, 1995 Form Date 11/16/94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 18, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Gary Vamey, Maintenance Superintendent Streets and Storm Drains APPROVAL TO PURCHASE ONE (1) 3 AXLE COMBINATION 6 X 4, 56,000 GVWR, WATER TANK/DUMP TRUCK FROM DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK SALES, INCORPORATED, OF COLTON, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $123,078.26 TO BE FUNDED 69.23% FROM FUND 72-4225-7045 AND 30.77% FROM FUND 09-4637- 7045 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council award the purchase of one (1) 3 Axle Combination, 6 X 4, 56,000 GVWR, Water Tank/Dump Truck shuttle system from Dieterich International Truck Sales, Incorporated of Colton, Califomia for One Hundred Twenty-Three Thousand Seventy-eight and Twenty-Six Cents ($123,078.26). The purchase to be funded from two accounts, 69.23% from fund 72-4225-7045 and 30.77% from fund 09-4637-7045 as budgeted. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Staff has researched the combination water/dump truck system for one year. The system incorporates one truck chassis mounted with a Stellar Shuttle System capable of using different truck bodies, water tank, dump body, flat bed or debris containers. Dieterich International Truck Sales, Incorporated, recently sold such a system to the County of San Bemardino with the specifications similar to the needs of Rancho Cucamonga. This Shuttle System enables the Maintenance Section, Parks and Street Sections, to purchase one truck instead of several for many different needs. Dieterich Intemational Truck Sales, Incorporated, has offered what is called a "Piggy Back/Co-operative Purchase" to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at the same price as the San Bemardino County unit, with modifications to the truck body, chassis, water tank and dump body. This offer was verified in letter form on July 6, 1995 by Carl H. Keehn II, Sales Representative of Dieterich International Truck Sales. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PURCHASE OF 56,000 GVWR October 18, 1995 Page 2 The Shuttle system will replace our current water truck, U#518 and U#630 dump truck, both are budgeted for replacement this year. We are excited about the capabilities of the Stellar Shuttle System and confident of its durability, as a vital part of our maintenance fleet. Respectfully submitted, WJO:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 18, 1995 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT NO. 14208, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD WEST OF ALTA CUESTA DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY THE DEVELOPER, MR. RALPH G. RITTENHOUSE. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement supplement and security for the previously approved improvement agreement and the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement supplement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Map, agreement, securities and annexation to maintenance districts for Tract No. 14208, located on the north side of Base Line Road west of Alta Cuesta Drive in the Medium Development District, were approved and accepted by City Council on April 5, 1995. However, when staff prepared the standard improvement agreement, the portion addressing the condition to construct and underground the existing overhead utilities was inadvertently omitted. So as to not delay the recordation of the Map or disrupt the Developer's financing schedule, staff and Mr. Rittenhouse agreed that this agreement supplement and security would be submitted for consideration by Council prior to his request of a Public Works Encroachment Pennit for the construction of the offsite improvements. The Developer, Mr. Ralph G. Rittenhouse, is submitting an agreement supplement and security to guarantee the construction and undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (except the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Base Line Road in the following amounts: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT NO. 14208 - RITTENHOUSE October 18, 1995 Page 2 Faithful Performance Bond $130,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 65,000.00 Copies of the supplement and previously approved agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:PV:dlw Attachments ,~T~A EXHIBIT 'A' sr~T ~ ~' i~O~' ,,,~ " //[//// /1 /I/ .r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO , STATE OF CALIFORNIA NO 5r~,LE 'Tr'<~cT k~o. RESOLUTION NO. q__~ "/t-/GL:7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT FOR . THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT OF TRACT NO. 14208 WHEREAS, Tract Map No. 14208, located on the north side of Base Line Road, west of Alta Cuesta Drive and Improvement Agreement of said Tract, submitted by Mr. Ralph G. Rittenhouse, Developer, were approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on April 5, 1995, and said map is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as a condition of said Tract said Developer has offered the Improvement Agreement Supplement and Improvement Security submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement Supplement and said Improvement Security submitted by said Improvement Agreement Supplement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk top attest. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 18, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engineer ~rb ACCEPTANCE OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13890-1 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET AND WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for Tract 13890-1, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $96,600.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Irrevocable Authority to Pay in the amount of $966,000.00 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion for Tract 13890-1, located on the north side of Highland Avenue, south of Banyan Street and west of Deer Creek Channel, the applicant was required to complete street improvements for the tract. The applicant has submitted a Maintenance Guarantee Bond. Therefore, it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds as follows: Developer: Homestead Land Development c/o Greystone Homes, Inc. 495 E. Rincon, Suite 115 Corona, CA 91719 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond Faithful Performance Irrevocable Authority to Pay #2/1/90B $96,600.00 $966,000.00 Respectfully Submitted, WJO:LRB:!y t,4ZT'O Attachments A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13890-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13890-1 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 18, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer~ RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13738, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALMOND AND SAPPHIRE STREETS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Rodine Company 147 East Olive Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Storm Drain) Respectfully submitted, $47,400.00 $58,800.00 William J. O'Neil Ciiy Engineer WJO:LRB:Iy ORDINANCE NO. 550 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE MAP FROM "MIXED USE, OFFICE, COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL" TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR APPROXIMATELY 47.3 ACRES OF LAND AND TO MEDIUM HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 19.2 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, ROCHESTER AVENUE ON THE EAST, THE FUTURE POPLAR DRIVE AND FUTURE CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND THE FUTURE ORCHARD AVENUE ON THE WEST, AND TO MAKE CHANGES TO PORTIONS OF THE TEXT AND GRAPHIC EXHIBITS OF THE COMMUNITY PLAN TO IMPLEMENT DESIGN FEATURES OF THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS- APN: 0227-151-18 AND 24. A. Recitals. 1. On September 13, and continued to September 27, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above- referenced Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing on September 13, 1995, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 95-44, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 95-01. 2. On October 4, 1995, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. O~inance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. Ordinance No. 550 Page 2 b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: a. The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommended approval of the Community Plan land use and text amendment hereinafter described to the City Council. This City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. b. The Community Plan land use and text amendment are consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c. The Community Plan land use and text amendment are consistent with the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d. The Community Plan land use and text amendment will have no significant environmental impact, as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 95-01 as described in the title and included in Exhibits "A" and "B" of this Ordinance. SECTION 5: Within 60 days of City Council approval, a revised Terra Vista Community Plan, incorporating the changes required shall be submitted to the City Planner. A total of 25 bound copies of the plan shall be submitted for distribution to the City Council, the City Clerk, the Planning Commission, and staff. In addition, one unbound original copy, and one executable copy on a 3.5 computer diskette in a format acceptable to the City, shall be submitted. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Z 0 C Z cC 0 o( It J, :1:::0 ~0 UJ Exhibit 'A' -o _=,~o - ° o >.,,---~--,:,; o > "' o ._~,-' ~ E "--= - .., E "' .. .~ ~_. ._~. ~ ,_ c w · -- U co. E ~ c.-e E w · co ou. cuX c. ~'" '~..eu ~ > _ - .-, .. c ',-' . UOC -- I- " ' ~ *-' ~ -- 0 '--,C C · a >" - u _o EE s:~ omE o,.~._ mm fJ (J -~'-'- .C> [.~ ~" ~,.ac: ~.. m E~: · >m e "o'~ .~ ~'~ ~~'~ ~ o ~. o ~ ~oE =: .a'~ mE -- ,o~.,. ,,, m a.o :~ ~> ~um~ m...,cc~'~'~ mwo I- $.; ,,, ~ :u 'o ,- o.. -- · - ;::~ '~u.c ~ I-c .c:co,,.- -coo om oc~ --~,., I-o I----°,-, me= I-mum I-.s=,-,~.'o (LLm._ · · · ~ I'-'~ · · · E .c -- .c .," o ~ ._u i"F:":~.-'~ -" "' ~ · ~.._>.:,:5o'" '-', ,:., o ,=~ ,- E-" ,,, c o'~_m 8 '[: w w > ~_ m c o '" ~ '----~..~i 'o ._ ~ w i .m~.- E w,.- =o wa i~. l~ w w 'S c ~: · R ._m ~ w m w ,- c .c --" iE i,E~ .c i: c o ,-~ ,: > > -~ ,.,: ... o '~ w ' :~::i' ":"'- :G .a u c-o 'o .o~ c ,- ~ w ~ w w= = = z; e ~ii! ',o o_~,= u ~ ~.,RI~UOII._ Ut -.Y Q,.+"'- 'r:: E ; u c o u w w ~ .., .~ u'o ,,, ~ 'a m~ w'° ~,~ ,-, w w-= ='~z: ~, >-- w='; -- u ~w °a""u~'~I -~ w E u '- :.- o w > c w ,.',w w ...,'S E~ti~ ~=.~ . ~. "~ w · ."- j : .. ._o > z w "'=-- c ,. ,...~ a :~' '=.m c ~ 0 e-or. mm,, m C E,,- *" :~"::: '~ OQ. ;el: c: ; -- ,,, ... ,- - ~ ·., ~ "->- > ,:?, s!~i~i'; =-..,·,. - O >> I>.a.,.,c= cc xw'; --~m ._em ._~o _Z I-_ ._ .c:_ ,. S. ,., rJ I---o 0 ,-, e u ~i~ I-- m ~: I-- · · · ~c.-_.- c.= > "· ." '[: · ma0E-o~ 'o '~"£c.c~e d o>,. e'm Z ¢)Z= ~,, '-' ~ I-" --I,LQ' Oe Z ~o.c w'; Z30 I''0 C 0 Eucc:G~e~ ¢a.[Ei..-o '~ u 'E · u E '~ . aS I-. e;"o u.- __Jll .111 III 'aAV UalS:aHOOUll[__lll__ _,1 ,'~3AV Nq:)III qlVI uJ · · 0 - - ,,_.-{:; 0 c= G_.I C::--- c.- G III · 'IAV !OfiMdl ~'~ I,iJ ':JAY NqAVHI 'mAy 'mAy UeAq..I .__~ ,'3AV N:J~41'IIIR __ III Z W 'aAV UqlSqHC)OU ILL__ IL_ (..) ']AV N'qAVHE (' E ~,.., 0 z E > MJ ] IN mms ' " Jill ' ' '3AV N3 ~/ : 0 o ,'? I ._" > ~ ~; ~ ~ lee I-3 ,,-; _-a 'i o~._ i > =" ~ Z :::)~ 'i on_.; .~U,O ,.. .= ,-,c = k. -~ OtDIL ,,' c- ';.,.';a,,a a - ~'~ qk < ,- u'w EcuE z o ~,..= -: · z .~i × .- >- < o%.wO 4: ~"" *' ' ' c z~EE8~ =: ~ ~ l:.c~ewe < z ~ ~ ~o '~' ~ ~, ."-.~ ~"' ~'~ ~ ._aw 0 m 4: 0 '7/ -- ~ e ')--" o 'o-~,-=',- ~' o ~ ww" ,,i '~._c .>.~_ >.] ... ~ o = o ~ · " .'9_.o',~ E*'~.,O.o a, c~'o · u , cn ._w ...~w ~ ,o ....- E '~ ·'o o ,-~ ~ o ._o .- ~ ' ._a, ;., = ~, a.c~ ~. ~ ~ ~' - eo_~.~ ~ o m ""&vS F-- ~-~: w o ,.o v,'o--- .a · .uu :~ w,..~ o ,- .~ o u u '-".-wu ..-~:S ~. w > u...~ 3.e ~--- :-"-9 : x . E~-'o E = ~e'= ~-- o=z: i ta .:= o o w E o ~ ~ E:=u a.,;'; '=' E · -',,,u,-..,-=)w w~ w ,.O.o,,S rJ _ w OLn E .,-"=: U..a'O'~ ,_'~..1'- Ww m~W~:~-I= i : ,.. w o'~'E w o'~ u:i I o'a w ~c,,. o~ c · --w .- ,,-~- .% _.1 ~":IAV Nq~lllllitl · · WAlt 30~Mdl ']AV Ui~SfHOOUII -: u u u u u · 'aAy N'qAVl..II ["" 0 II ,.,- t... 77 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 18, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONSIDERATION OF THE PROPOSED OFF-SITE SALE OF BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SALE OF GIFT BASKETS FOR A CRAFT AND GIFT RETAIL STORE, THE WILD GRAPE, LOCATED AT 8057 AND 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution and send a copy of it to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. ANALYSIS Background: This item is the result of a request from the business owners of The Wild Grape, Ms. Nancy Belletto and Ms. Mary Heredia. They have requested a letter from the City be sent to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) stating that the issuance of an ABC license to The Wild Grape would serve the public's convenience and necessity. The Wild Grape is a retail store for crafts and gifts located in the Thomas Winery, a City-designated Historic Landmark. The owners are expanding their business to include the floor area of the historic Still building. They would like to sell bottled wine with the custom gift baskets and hand-painted carriers requested by their customers. The ABC license would allow the sale of beer/wine for off-site consumption. The Wild Grape estimates that the sale of the wine gift baskets/hand painted carriers would be 5 percent of their gross sales. Staff believes the proposed off-site sale of beer and wine is incidental to the primary business. Further, The Wild Grape is located within the historically landmarked Thomas Winery building and Still building. The proposed use is appropriate with the historic use of these buildings as the oldest winery in California. Attached is a detailed description of their proposal. Requirements from Department of ABC: According to a representative from the Department of ABC, the general area (Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue) where The Wild Grape is located has a concentration of various types of ABC licenses. For example, there are two liquor stores, three restaurants, and a billiards hall that serves beer and wine. A criteria for issuing an ABC license to The Wild Grape is a determination from the City CiTY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT BEER & WINE SALES - WILD GRAPE October 18, 1995 Page 2 stating that the license would serve the public convenience and necessity as required by Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code. The concentration of these businesses is a natural outcome of the importance that location plays in real estate; this intersection is one of the busiest in the City. Correspondence: Staff has received a copy of the petition sent to the Department of ABC by the owners of the Thomas Winery Liquor store opposing the issuance of an ABC license to The Wild Grape, as shown in Exhibit B. The Thomas Winery Liquor store is in the same commercial center as The Wild Grape. The owners of the Thomas Winery Liquor store raised no specific objections to the proposed use; however, questioned the concentration of licenses in the general area from a "social point of view." Public Safety Concerns: The primary business of The Wild Grape is the retail sale of crafts, craft supplies, and gifts. The retail sales of bottled wine with the gift baskets is an added service and convenience for their customers. The hours of operation of the store are Monday through Thursday from 10 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Friday and Saturday from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Sunday from 12 noon to 5 p.m. However, the store conducts craft classes daily, except Fridays, between 6 and 9:30 p.m. During this time, the stores, both in the Winery and Still buildings, are closed to the public. The nature of the businesses in the area that have ABC licenses are totally different from The Wild Grape. The restaurants and the billiards hall licenses are for on-site consumption of beer and wine and the closing time is usually 11 p.m. for weekdays and between 1 or 2 a.m. on weekends. Liquor store licenses are for off-site consumption and generally are open until 2 a.m. Because of the nature of the business, the limited scope of the sale of bottled wines, and the hours of operation of The Wild Grape, staff finds that the addition of retail sale of bottled wine will not create a public safety concern in the general area. CONCLUSION Based upon the above analysis, staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached Resolution. BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Exhibit A - Letter from The Wild Grape dated September 11, 1995 Exhibit B - Petition from the Thomas Winery Liquor Store Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - ABC Application Resolution of Approval The Wild GraDe 8916 Foothill Blvd., "D" Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 September 11, 1995 City of Rancho Cucamonga Cc~nunity Development Department Planning Division 10500 C~vic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: FILING REQUIREMENT NO. 4-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, NON-CONSTRUCTION To Whom It May Concern: The Wild Grape is a reEail operation locaEed in the Thcmas Winery Plaza. Our current location is that of the oldest cc~,~ercial winery in the state of California. We sell decorative painting supplies and "grape" related gift items. Our intent is to increase our gift line to incorporate wines reflective of our local history. We ~Duld like to market these wines in gift baskets and hand painted carries. We have leased the "distillery"building adjacent to our current location and plan to expand our retail space in that building. Please note that this addition is part of the Wild Grape business. However, for clarification purposes, the propsal will be referred to as nhe Wild Grape Too. If we obtain the licence to sell wines, we will expand on the "grape- wane" theme of our store and use floral arrangements, hand-painted items and gift baskets to prc~ote both the heritage of Rancho Cuca- monga and the "Wild Grape." Approximately 5% of the total floor area will be devoted to wine sales. It is esEimated that 5% of gross sales will be generated annually (based on total sales of both locations). We feel the public is very interested in preserving as much of the local history as possible and that many visitors are curious about this particular building. Our usage of this building would not in any way compromise the integrity of the site. 2 TDPIE: C, k4 'SAN BERNARDINO ROAD 'iLl Z > <I: _z SUBJECT SI. TE/ -- 1.600,~ 84 --. IUTR, E CAES~'~ 1,4oo sF -- 1.273 SF 8-10 I II ~ ® Par. I CITY OF R A:i"i.O MONGA PLA N FOOTHI LL Project: Title: Exhibit: BLVD. 172. 50 Par. RECEIVED R E C E I V E D c.L,,o.s,s OCT 03 1995 SEP 25 1995 City ot Rancho Cucamonga - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGh CITY CLERK P'anninOI I Y_r CRTION FOR aLCOHOL BEUERRGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number ............ 312800 Receipt Number ......... 1054295 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date Issued Date DISTRICY SERVING LOCATION: - RIVERSIDE Name of Business: THE WILD GRAPE Location of Business: Number and Street 8057 N VINEYARD AVE City, State Zip Code County Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different fxom premise address) RANCHO CUCAMONGA If premise licensed: Type of license Transferor's names/license: RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO YES 8916 FOOTHILL BLVD CA 91730 · JAR TRUCK STOP 271481 CA 91730 License TVDe Transaction TvDe Fee TYPe Master DUD Date Fee 1. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND 2. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND 3. 20 OFF-SALE BEER AND 4. NA NO LICENSE TYPE Have you ever been convicted of a felony? NO PERSON TO PERSON TRANS NA YES 0 SEP 20,1995 $50.00 ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 SEP 20,1995 $34.00 PREMISE TO PREMISE TRA NA YES 0 SEP 20,1995 $100.00 STATE FINGERPRINTS NA YES 0 SEP 20,1995 $78.00 TOTAL $262.00 Have you ever violated any provisions of the AlcohoUc Beverage Control Control Act, or regulations ofthe department pertai~ng to ~e Act? NO Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date SEP 20,1995 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, cerd~es and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application. Ouly authorizecl to make this application on its behalf; t2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are u'ue: (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any credilor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department, Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) ;BELLETTO NANCY KATHLEEN HEREDIA MARY MAGDALENA ABC 211 (9/93) RESOLUTION NO. I:~.~.--//Z7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVIEWING AN APPLICATION FOR THE OFF-SITE SALE OF BEER AND WINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SALE OF GIFT BASKETS FOR A CRAFT AND GIFT RETAIL STORE, THE WILD GRAPE, LOCATED AT 8057 AND 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The Wild Grape has filed an application for an off-site sale of beer and wine license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make determination that the issuance of the said license will serve the public convenience or necessity. 3. On the 18th day of October 1995, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this resolution. 4. All legal perquisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above referenced meeting on October 18, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Wild Grape is located at 8057 and 8916 Foothill Boulevard and its primary business is the retail of crafts and gifts. The hours of operation are generally between 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. b. The Wild Grape proposes to obtain an off-site sale of beer and wine license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for the sale of bottled wine with custom gift baskets and hand painted carriers. The purpose is to provide an added service and a convenience for their customers. This service is ancillary to their primary business. c. The general area of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue where the Wild Grape is located has a concentration of various types of ABC licenses issued for liquor stores, restaurants, and a billlard hall that serves beer and wine. However, the nature of the business operation for these establishments is different from the Wild Grape. RESOLUTION NO. THE WILD GRAPE October 18, 1995 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council concludes that the addition of retail sale of bottled wine for the Wild Grape will not create a pubic safety concern in the general area because of the nature of the business, the limited scope of the sell of bottled wines, and the hours of operation. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this City Council hereby determines that the issuance of an off-site sale of beer and wine ABC license for the Wild Grape serves public convenience and necessity. 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. 10-11-199B 6=54P~1 FROM CONSUMER MEDICAL 9099~80609 P. 2 Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce 8280 Utica Avenue, Suite 160, Rallcho Cucamonga, CA 91730 October 11, 1995 Honorable Bil! Alexander Mayor c~ty o[ Rancho Cucamonga Haven Avenue ~3~h~ Ch~camonga, CA 91730 Dear Mayor Alexander: On'October 11, 1995 the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cuc~unonga Chamber of Commerce met to discuss the r8m~f~at~on~ the recent CaliZornia Supreme Court ruling which upheld proposition 62. After an extended discussion w~th both City Administrator, and Timothy Younger, Chamber of Commerce Council, the Board of D~rectors voted to Support the enclosed resolution to be presented to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council. We are requesting that the ~ancho Cucamonga City Council consider cur resolution and ~u~pond collection of the RanCho Cucamonga Utility Tax until this matter can be brought to a vote of the people as required by law. Your thoughtful consideration will bc appreciated. Sincerely, Donald J.~u~h, M.D. Pre~idun~ Rancho Cucamonga Cheer of Cu~m~u='~ 1 ~- I 1 -199,.% 6: -%3PI',.1 FROM C. ONSLi',4E~ HED I I SOLUTION W~EREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce has strongly opposed the Rancho Cucamonga Utility Tax since before its inception, and WI4EREAS, Proposition 62 has been upheld by the Supreme Court the State of California, and W~EREAS, the Utility Tax has never been brought to a vote before the People of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and WHE~, we believe the City of Rancho Cucamonga has instituted the Utility Tax in violation of ProDosition 62, and W~EREAS, t~ City of RanchO Cucamonga has collected taxes from the People of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in violation of propo~ition 6~, ann WI4ERBAS, the Ca]~[~ia Supreme Court has determined that taxes such as the Rancho Cucamonga Utility Tax are not legal taxes unleee they are brought h~[ore the People and passed by at least a majority vote of Uhe People, NOW, T~EREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Comeroe doee strongly recomm~n~ that collection of the Raucho CucamOnga Utility Tax be imediately suspended and that no further Utility Taxe~ be collected by h~ City of Rancho Cucamonga until such time as ~he Utility Tax is brought to a vote before the People of the City of Rancho Cucamo~g~- APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors o~ th~ ~ancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce. IN WITNESS WMEREOF, I, Donald J. Kurth, M.D., President of the Rancho Cucan~onga Cheer o~ Commerce, have hereunto set. my and caused the seal of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce ~o be affixed ~hie Eleventh day of October, 199~- Donald J ~Kurth, M. D, ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 18, 1995 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: By: William J. O'Neil, City EngineerSGr~' Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer t~50 SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF ITEM 15 "ACCEPTANCE OF TRACT 13890-1" FROM THE OCTOBER 18, 1995, CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDER The subject tract was placed on the October 18, 1995, City Council Agenda, in anticipation of the street lights on Highland Avenue being installed. The street lights are the only remaining work to be completed. The developer, Greystone Homes, Incorporated, had requested that they be placed on the agenda to expedite the acceptance of the Tract to allow the connection of utilities to the remaining homes, which are in escrow. Ordinance 430 requires that the tract be accepted prior to the connection of these utilities. Staff will occasionally agree to place an item on the agenda for City Council consideration, when the remaining work is minor, the work can be completed prior to the Council Meeting and the Developer assures staff the work will be completed. This arrangement only occurs when further delay will cause additional hardship on a home buyer. It is in the best interest of the Developer that they comply with such an arrangement and they normally complete the work as agreed. However in this case the developer failed to install the lights, as agreed, and one home buyer will have to move into a temporary residence and store their belongings, because the sale of their existing house has closed escrow. Staff will continue to work with the Developer, but must recommend that the accepting of Tract 13890-1 and release of surety be removed from the October 18, 1995, City Council Consent Calender. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: October 18, 1995 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer MEETING OF THE ROUTE 30 TASK FORCE The October meeting of the Task Force was held on Tuesday, October 17, and was devoted to a discussion of whether all planned interchanges along Route 30 through the City should be retained. Initially, the Milliken Avenue interchange had been questioned most, and information was gathered for the Task Force conceming that particular interchange. City and Caltrans staff presented information on the effect of the Milliken Avenue interchange elimination on traffic conditions on City streets and the freeway. It was pointed out that traffic eliminated from any interchange location would be added to traffic at adjacent interchanges and impact the streets in between. In some cases local streets may be affected, but the main effect would be to Highland Avenue/19th Street and Banyan Street. Caltrans reported an increase in cost for elimination of the Milliken interchange because extra lanes would be needed on the freeway at the Haven Avenue interchange and on the Haven Avenue bridge to handle the added on/off ramp traffic. A rough estimate of the extra cost, considering savings of eliminating an interchange but not including right-of-way, is 1.3 million dollars. There was also information presented by the Police Chief regarding crime in on/off ramp areas. The Police Department reported no evidence of increased crime at interchanges in Rancho Cucamonga and the same indication from several other law enforcement sources. Task Force members then discussed the advantages and disadvantages of elimination of the Miiliken interchange. The meeting concluded with a request for more information about the effects of the elimination of either the Milliken Avenue or Carnelian Avenue interchanges or both. Additional information was also requested on basic interchange spacing in the area, traffic volumes and projections and further investigation into the relationship of crime to the presence of an interchange. The Task Forces wishes to reconsider the interchange issue in November after receiving the requested information. The next Task Force meeting will be on Tuesday, November 14, at 6:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:sd