No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/11/28 - Agenda Packet n LJ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 28, 2001 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Maaas Coin Mannenno _ Com Stewart _ Com Tolstoy II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 14, 2001 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following dems are public hearings ~n which concerned mdrv~duals may voce their opinion of the related pro/ect Please wad to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be l~mded to 5 minutes per md~v~dual for each pro/ect Please sign m aRer speaking A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-23 - LAKEES (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to allow service to patrons 1 S years and older for an existing restaurant with sports bar and gall, including entertainment, dancing, amusement devices, and on site consumption of alcoholic beverages, in the Community Commercial Distract (Subarea 3), located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077-601-07 Related File Entertainment Permit 00-02 (Continued from November 14, 2001) B ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 00-02 - LAKEES (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to renew an entertainment permit to allow, disc jockey music, danang, satellite television, and amusement devises (pool tables, dart boards), and allow service to patrons less than 21 years of age in conjunction with a bar and restaurant in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 3), located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard -APN 1077-601-07 Related file Conditional Use Permit 97-23 (Continued from November 14, 2001) C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16217 -LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A proposed tentative tract map consisting of 8 lots for multi-family residential, on 8 66 acres of land within the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue south of West Greenway Park - APN 1077-422-40 Related File Development Review DRC2001-00407 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00407 -LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES -The renew of detailed site plan and budding elevations for Tentative Tract 16217, consisting of 166 multi-family apartment units on 8 66 acres in the Medium-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Commurnty Plan, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue, south of West Greenway Park APN 1077-422-40 Related File Tentative Tract Map Subtt16217 Staff has prepared a Negatroe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00519 - TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS - The development of a dnve-thru fast food restaurant consisting of 2,715 square feet on 69 acre of land m the Neighborhood Commercal distract, located at 7369 Milliken Avenue - APN 227-18210 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the bins and place for the general public to address the comm~ss~on Items to he discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER APPOINTMENTS lJ • • Page 2 C~ VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Admmistrahve Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment 6me If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the Commission 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certdy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 21, 2001, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~wc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~~~~ Page 3 Vicinity Map Planning Commission November 28, 2001 Hillside Banya A, B F: TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER APPOINTMENTS City of Rancho Cucamonga ,~ CITY HALL Nilson ~T ~ ~ Y ~ U = ~ ~ Q NOVEMBER 8, 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA INDEX ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PAGES Agenda 2 - 5 Modification to Conditional Use Permit 97-23 A - B 6 8 Entertainment Permit 00-02 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16217 C - D 9 89 Development Review DRC2001-00407 E Conditional Use Permit DRC001-00519 90 - 156 F Trails Advisory Committee Member Appointments 157 - 161 I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE• November 28, 2001 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-23 - LAKEES (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to allow service to patrons 18 years and older for an existing restaurant with sports bar and gnll, including entertainment, dancing, amusement devices, and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages, in the Community Commercial Distract (Subarea 3), located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard -APN 1077-601-07 Related file• Entertainment Permit 00-02. (Continued from November 14, 2001) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 00-02 - LAKEES (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to renew an entertainment permit to allow, disc jockey music, dancing, satellite television, and amusement devices (pool tables, dart boards), and allow service to patrons less than 21 years of age in contunction with a bar and restaurant in the Community Commercial Distract (Subarea 3), located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard -APN 077-601-07 Related file Conditional Use Permit 97-23 (Continued from November 14, 2001) BACKGROUND On October 10, 2001, the Planning Commission continued the public heanng on these items to allow time for the applicant to address concerns related to overflow parking Since that time, the Police Department has issued revised comments on the protect and recommends that the operation not be allowed to serve patrons less than 21 years old The applicant requested a continuance of the public hearing to November 28, 2001, to allow them sufficient time to meet with the Police Department on this matter and to complete the parking analysis requested at the October 10 meeting The applicant has met with Police staff and is exploring a revised modification request, including sectioning off a portion of the nightclub for service to patrons younger than 21 years old where no alcohol will be served The applicant also wishes to add an outdoor patio area They now request a continuance to the January 9, 2002, meeting Note that the changes anticipated by the applicant will require a revised protect description, • therefore, new public notices must be sent out with the revised descnptions forthe January 9, 2002, heanng ITEMS A 8 B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MOD CUP97-23 AND EP00-02 - LAKEES (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) November 28, 2001 . Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the public heanng for modification of Conditional Use Permit 97-23 and renewal of Entertainment Permit 00-02 to January 9, 2002, per the applicant's request Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB BUtc Attachment Exhibit "A" -Applicant's letter for continuance request, dated November 19, 2001 • • ~~~ flECEIVED 11-21- 1, it OBAM• ' ~ - ~iincerelyR ' ~. ~ . .. . • • l~gbbie I.akkeea 9ni#£~die.i:a . s- .~, Division ~~ „ ~ ~ f •' •~" ~- ' , I~you have'aa~•tjttdstions,piea5~ call anytime 909-987 9322 s apcoming hearing to review inquest for 78 yr and >n on this matter to give ua ample time to address auy and Captain Ortiz from the Rancho Cucatitooga l?otice ing issues and 1 B yts* 'We would like to add tQ the .- .a rec{ua'at i'oi=a patio ac,wias. We ars open to any advice fitom City in regards to ~> N CUCANCNDA COY OEV. M1 ~ ~~.~~•~1~„'~ 10I34 Foothill Slvd., Rancho Cu<Amouga, Ca 91730 19; 2001 ~ - ., } " , - ' ,This letter isim,'te~ards tp•the We ary ssksg'for-aEt,~ 9 the.~•Con~ti . IDepE might 16~'in tegarda't; a i , ~, ,~ .< ~ - •:~ - a , y 's, " ,~ , s • ,, ~+ k • ~~ . .-r; ,. -•, . ,. I- ' r - _,~ .~, _ ;~. ,., ,i ' ,~., - I ~~ f~ { ~ 3 the c i t y o f Rancho Cucamonga Staff Report DATE November 28, 2001 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAPSUBTT16217-LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A proposed tentative tract map consisting of 8 lots for multi-family residential apartments, on 8 66 acres of land within the Medium-High Residential Distnct (14-24 dwelling urnts per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue south of West Greenway Park -APN 1077-422-40 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00407 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES -The review of detailed site plan and bwlding elevations for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16217, consisting of 166 multi-family apartment units on 8 66 acres in the Medium-High Residential Distnct (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Commurnty Pian, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue, south of West Greenway Park -APN 1077-422-40 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density The proposed protect is 19 17 dwelling unts per acre The protect is located within the Medium-High Residential Distnct (14-24 dwelling urnts per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Greenway Trail and Single-Family Residential/Low-Medium Residential Distnct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Del Mar Apartments/Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Milliken Park/Park West - West Greenway Park and Coyote Canyon School/Park and School C General Plan Designations Protect Site - Medwm-High Density Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre)/Ten-a Vista Commurnty Plan North - Greenway Trail and Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling urnts per acre) South - Medwm-High Density Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) East - Milliken Park West - Coyote Canyon School and West Greenway Park ITEMS C 8 D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 16217 & DRC2001-00407 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES November 28, 2001 Page 2 D Site Charactenstics The site is immediately north of the existing Del Mar Apartments and has previously been rough graded as a "super-pad" under previously approved Tract 13717 and Milliken Avenue is existing There are no remaining trees or significant vegetation on the site E Parkino Calculations Padvng Regwred Two Bedroom - 1 8 spaces/unit X 148 = 266 spaces (one within an enclosed garage) Three Bedroom - 2 0 spaces/unit X 18 = 36 spaces (all within an enclosed garage) In addition to the number of spaces requred for each unit, one parking space for every four units is required for guest parking 166 X 0 25 = 42 spaces Therefore, the total number of spaces regwred is 344 Of this total, a minimum of 184 spaces must be enclosed within an enclosed garage Parfong Provided Enclosed 241 Open 120 Total: 361 ANALYSIS A General The protect includes 166 units, consisting of 148 two-bedroom and 18three-bedroom units The unit square footage ranges from 1,092 square feet to 2,038 square feet Units are arranged in three building types containing 4 to 6 units per bwldmg Ali of the bwidings are two-story Enclosed garages are provided for each unit, and in some cases the garage is accessible directly from the unit B Desion Review Committee The Design Review Committee (Fong, McNeil, and Stewart) reviewed the protect on October 2, 2001 At that time, the Committee approved the bwldmg architecture and site landscaping, however, the applicant was requested to address the architectural colorscheme and more evenly distnbute the open parking spaces throughout the site The protect returned to the Design Review Committee on October 16, 2001, with revised architectural color scheme, which was approved at that time, and a revised Site Plan with an additional parking stall available in the northeasterly portion of the site The Committee continued to express concern regarding the availability of open parking in the southwest portion of the site and asked the applicant to respond with further revisions • Upon further investigation, the applicant has indicated that no additional parking can be provided in the southwesterly portion of the site without resulting in the loss of units, therefore, the applicant wishes to proceed to the Planning Commission for consideration at this time Within the southwest portion of the site, there are typically 15 units within 150-feet of each of two bays of three parking spaces, at the regwred visitor parking ratio of 1 space every four units, the area should ideally have four visitor parking stalls available within a convenient distance The malonty of these units include an attached two-car garage, and the site overall is parked in excess of the code requirement, as noted above in the Parking Calculations C Technical Review/Gradino Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on October 3, 2001 All requirements of the Committee are included as Conditions of Approval The Grading Committee commented on eliminating the retaining wall at the boundary between the park and the project site and revisions to vanous sections on the Grading Plan to accurately reflect the location of ~-) ~ Z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 16217 & DRC2001-00407 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES . November 28, 2001 Page 3 the walkway Both have been addressed by the applicant to the satisfaction of staff There were no other outstanding issues or extraordinary arcumstances identified by either Committee D Private Ooen Space In accordance with the Park Development Agreement, private parks and recreation areas can be given half credit toward the provision of park land, based on the cntena established in the Park Implementation Plan The open space shall be a) exclusive of regwred yards and setbacks, b) pnvately maintained, c) restncted for recreational purposes by recording covenants which run with the land and cannot be defeated without consent of the City Council, d) 50 percent active in design and function and be reasonably contiguous in nature, and e) usable for recreational purposes or have other recreational improvements that will meet needs of the residents The Open Space/Park Credit Plan (Exhibit "H") identifies those areas for which park credit is being requested The total amount of pnvate open space included in the request for park credit is 31,696 square feet (728 acres), 50 percent of this total, 36 acres, wdl then be credited toward park development obligations within Terra Vista Staff recommends approval of the areas identified on the Prvate Open Space Exhibits E Environmental Assessment An Initial Study was prepared for the protect In addition, a Noise Impact Study was prepared Mitigation is included in the attached resolution for air quality, traffic, and noise impacts CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve issuance of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions of approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16217 and Development Review DRC2001-00407, subtect to all Conditions of Approval Respectfully submitted, Bra r City Planner BB DM\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "G" - Tentative Tract Map • Exhibit "H" - Open Space/Park Credit Plan Exhibit "I" - Design Review Committee Minutes Exhibit "J" - Intial Study Resolution Approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16217 Resolution Approving Development Review DRC2001-00407 ~) 0 3 ~~~~ ; §~ CV 2 y Ca ~ s ~"tl ~ r 2• x; Oa4QO'o iQii ^' '~ h cp°~: v - y i a ~ z ~ ,yeaE °' .. 6 i b _ ,s ~° _ ' ~ Z ~ ; E.r o eem ~ U U~id s§iag e 1°`8G ~ g ' ~ # F- S Z Q ~ ~ 43P`~ •~pp.p ~ ~ y YY ~ Fogp ~ ' z F W ~m ° ii~~~ l o-.i tl Sa . U ll F •-e . W ~ t F ~ J1 1 1~- -[7- ~. ~ U ~~ ~ 1 ~^ I~C~. 1 ^ P ~ ^/~ ~_ _._-l - ~_ I I ~~ -, '~ ~\ly _ r _ ~\ 1 1. 1 J .~ 1 , I --~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ I f ~', i= I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~i we e i ~~ g~ i :p e ~. of ~e o~ s s~~ ~~I ~~! o e '~. 1 1 1 1 acEy 1 1 f~I 1 1 ~t ,~. I 1 ~. J Li o Q~~,o~ ~y9~~~i °a ^^O~ ~~ S ty ~~a; ~ yE i G ~~~o~' o~~'~i ~ ~o~ ~ oo^ ~ a~ //~. \.,~ ~ , 6.y ;~ ;~~_~~ • ~g _~ ~~ S ~ :: .e 3 .:; ;e ~ 1 i ~ dI!1 p ~ ~~ 3~ 3 ~ ~~ ' ~ ~ ~ p ~ - FFlip . $fi , ~ 1 W g e g g 3g ' ~ ~ >? ~ ; -~ Z ~ 1 Iii ~~ e ~ X33 e i ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~; w 9~ ! € 3 ~ I ~i ~~tll ~~ a `~ ~~ 8c ea83 a 9 ~a e ~:: ~ e ~' g ee ~v _~- _ _---- ---- ---_-;-- - 2 j ~ 3lIN3AdN3NIT71W ~ ~ y ~ y~~ r n ~ ,wue~ / / 2 Q = _~ _ _~ ~-7 n - - - i i you - G, 6 ~ ~- l o ' p8 a ~ F: ., s 2 1 3° I I i _ O _ ~ I I ~ ~ (4 ' ~ W ~ z _ [Q ' - ~ z 6 [ i• '• ~ ~ ~ n 0 ,i 1 a ~ ~ ~ ~ Q O~ ~ ~ x Q 1 U ~~ ~ J ~ ~~ ~ i I ( ' _ _ V ~5 d ' ~ 2 J' 1 * Z~ I ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ o -- _ _ ```, __ ~ ~ o t A _ ~ Y a-mm aru I ~ 4 sea xa ~] ~ ~ , t L 10010!' N0.{NYJ eIIItOD 5 °y ~~O J $ a C ~ ~ ,~ ~~ `^`\ J PROJECT MAP i~ COMMUNITY AMENIN LEGEND Om O w ~..... O ...a,...,.......~, p ,.~.....,...... p ,...~...~...............~~ O ^~ __ _ PLANT LIST ~I ~ ~~- ~Y .. ~I I)\ II y • II dI@§~ I I \`` P o w ,~r,~. N~o..~^ „• PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN Lewis Operating Corporation DEL MAR II 1156 N Mountain Avenue Upland, Cahfomla 91786 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (909)985-1970 • ~ ti ~~ a ~~ ~~~ 5[CIgiJ vam 4on= i5e a J4~.I.uu4U irODUJr a LS u r0 (a 9r'06 [ru! a.nuL Ia491 es .e+r aa:nr [CIS Goa yl r 4earrtY[ Sr 0°- L( Ce 866 ~4 [ (Ilan pfY rrpp Ir.Jrll: ra Dorf ru nsa..+ls r44a cn r4... :mL[I .L rw L Cr o+VG.. 'a 4r r ,^,rrC ( 1 9atl Jr ~ ~1- m yr ~' la_r ~~ .....,. s >.J ..~-° man \~rl: [rr4 ~I4 9C+.~C ~ Sy 91..:-1 rr 963f rJUr Ln a lr,L 1 LVIU 9rr[. r 1l 4 prC 19091 flYtl ~ )r 9r J t0..4arv[5 narlu ~1 a.le rJ. rG .Srrr ~up ~i 4 [., [~ r44e, + .r 4.JrL 19[91 a ]5 r .. S 4L+1 L-rrG Ca 9r 16+ ~.ml 1949r I .n w o, sJ~ L=x a . msJ I4 ,+ 19>r .ma000 ~~~~ L roti ,r. c s•I+p +Lal ~ pr ` Llrrlua ! (u.G ~ [ BOJ r Yr ~. a - ] C9 9r+ee r 4~.. f .9r y a a~ ZOEL 4KY~guu n ~m f rrx xn ~ irrrrn r roil coN~onunrnin~ rueroti( ti CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN TF.NTA'I'I\'E 'I'I~A('"I' N(l I (i? I i IN TIIE UTY @ R\NI IIU CIIL UIO V1.9 COUNTY Oi SAN RERNAHIIINU STATI Of CAI Ii ONAI\ Mr 2041 ^ •v 4.951x LV[S r. ~v°^ a°sve GIY B66 sL4LS xLISS I a[I+(aL4 r.Gl Er ~ iX .x 6 S[ e c~ 9 [JUUUwrv NADOIE k ASSOCIATES INC O 2 rte Fq .r sI4LL,\ 4 } 4 ~=34k1 ~ r _ 98x6 aucw c+[ • n+x F -_ __. - ----- U ~I s ~+•++:.rn •~ -~fy„~ +.. nu '`rr'nu. ~.aw ~:•:~,~•.+- ""' "`°' wG66dlrtU AGYm IwM7llYJ 3FwYW `lS3WlYLVWM'1N Ht 3JNb2/O S1031/HOZId Y1YEM lroN AYJ YVltfro(euU a[wsv[ie YJ ONr1M w-aD6 Od 3/LY3~lYW1'1WNYPN1LgVVlll NO/1 b'tJOdN00 ONl1 b2/3d0 S1M37 ~~- o~-.~~ arr,~s SNOl1Y/1373 SL'JN/07/(18 M31A32I L~1 N'JlS3O/1N3Wd073i130) t/~NbOj~7tJ.~ 'yJNOWb'~II~OH~Nb2! `// jft/W 73O `- S! ,B 0 ~aoz srasn~nv sm! r NOLLYA373 3015 ~r m ~~~ ~ •~-- ~~CY~"" ' in rID, j ` ~ ti-~ . •• + _ ~` .,...--~ NOLLYA373 HY3H/NOLLYA3731NON~ ~ 4i ti ~ \ ~ a C ~ n~ ~~ .,,,.. w.~,...,,,,,m., . m°~., O O __ ainaains xswu • r1 U • s~# nR ~g~~ s~i i~~ ~ ~I f, ~~1~~ 6 m ~ z ~~ ° r~^ ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~" `a~~ U ~~: ~, k~ o :%~ :~` Q Q -----F w c~ z ~~ o ,~ w ,~ e o ~ ' _ t r~ lmn N v, p J 4 O m o 0 ~ , ~ 4 U Q 2 ~Q~ ¢ ~ ~~ '~4`,ri ~ O U ~~ ,." ~ ~ ~ Q ~. ° ~ ~.,.`4 ~ o Q' . a ~ U 'o " e~T~ 2 ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ 0~ W ~~ O ~~ ~ _ ~ C~ O ~2 • • s s s n BUILDING 70 -FIRST FLOOR PLAN TOTAL BUILDING AREA 4,274 SF 02610fp 7 Af036 9EPI£IWER fdml DEL MAR 11 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN/A °= _~~ ] (DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REV/EW) scue t/4•-r-o• LEWIS OPERATING CORPOR4 TION 1196 NORTN MOUNTA/NAVENUE PO BOX 6M UP1M/O G 91Tfl6C6N (W9f 816-)506 FAXl909f W86T16 ARCHITECTS ORANGE ~~•--~. IH NORTH ONANOE ST ORANGE GLIFORNIA ep688 (1111 8]49960 ~„-,^,~,~ d ~ ~ ~ ~1~~j11j1 ~`1~• ~ ~ ' ~ I I~~ ~ ~~~I ~,~,~ -R f 2 O O R p 's ~ $o ' ; y a ~ ~~ ___ _ m _________ i ~~ b _ 2 Q = a-o ___ ~ W ' C ~ _ ~ y ~ y - ~~ e i! z~ Q _ _ V Z o ~ ~ ~ ~ w m o O ~ ® _ ~ 2 2 a --- O p -- j ~ Z ~ ~ a m - U ~~ ~~ 3 ; -- 2 ~ ~ ~~ u ~ ~ ~ ~~ : ; = U r~~ --- J U ~ Us ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ a ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ fl `~ • r1 LJ ! i • 1 ~ 3 _. HC c~ I -----; -- --- 00 - i -a-t,- ~ - -~- -~- 0 0 _ --~- ~ ~ ~-- _ - o - (~ ; ' --- -- 9 r ~ -- --- 4 ------ , ----- HC BUILD/NG 25 -SECOND FLOOR PLAN TOTAL BUILD/NGAREA. 3,811 SF Af016 Aucusrae xwf DEL MAR ll, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN/A (DEVELOPMENTA7ES/GNREVIEWI o '' B' ' =~~ SCALE 1/4 ~ 1'-0' J L~~1 _ LEW/S OPER.4TlNG CORPORATION ARCHITECTS ORANGE ~ fIdIM]4MIULN/NVA4H'A6 PQ BOCR10. ~AMD.G IIILSQlA 11A/N6N~FAX(1ry/YNQ1~ 1N NQ4MC14AN3E ST, OPAN(iE~GV.6pfNH 8ldM (rf11G9PWB0 m~__~ ~. ~. ~...~.. 02615fp2"'~'f ~.~~~ ,~„ ,•^. ~= o8364ti (rl!) DBem nNNJinYJ 3'JNYLtl Ls 3•JNYdO NLLW~M! szL°en (Bae/xvi Y05L'B16 (8061 pL8Y159L{B KJ [INVidn OLB XOB Od 3/IN3AYN/YLNnOW NLNCIN 6SI! `°" @°~ 30Nb'NO S1031/HO?~b' NOl1 b'~JOd2/00 ONl1 b2/3d0 S1M37 _- ~,~.1 .o:! -.rL! a~w~s M3Ii13MNJlS3O/1N3Wd073i1301 dlN2/Odl7b'O 'b'JNOWb'OnO OHONb2/ `// b/d/i~/ 730 ~~_ .a .o a l6az szisn~nr szolr ~S El / ~6 V3?/V JN/07In8 N101 S3Jb2lb'J Nb/7d 2/007d 1S?Jld - 5Z JN107/rl8 ~--- --- --Z ~-- ---- --~ i i i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i ` i i i i ~H ~H Z-- -- f----- - Z---- --- -- f ~ ~ ~1~! H 1~ e-x J L p' '~ ~1~11 a III Illl e ~~T~ m III ^ OL__nSdi ~ g L = 6 II ~ 2 $ { C I ~I ~ I g 0 9 O3 o B u L__ll~~l ° J U~ I. ~ W h Q I I WWN r _ L_ III U x Q= I" _ ^ S W L - ~ L- ~ I LI ~ h I O ^ y ° O o w o ~ ~ o h '~ w ~ -oo ~ f9 Q ~ e I I o' w € I I ~ 2 O I ~ ~ I > W ~- U' ~ Q III I II I ~ ? 0 Z ii I I I m `~ O a I I ^ O °~r~ ¢ ~~ III `--'"" V '~ ~-- ,_ ~ ~~ ~¢ ? i 2 ~a i ° ~ ~~ Q e O~ 00 ~ V (U^ I I vi O v 0 Z~ M - - ^ a ~e I ~ ~m I ° ~6 I I I ~ ~i I I ~ ~ III II III ~ O~ - 1 i ^ Q v / .r ~' n Q ;~ a N O `!L`JLU ^~•r ~•~ ¢%N6lY /t!L/ WVZ! MNWINJ'3'JM1'V1p lS3EWM/0 NILCW N! Sll%1BIBI6/XVJ'SOSL9IB/6CK/ OLdJSVLIB YJ ONVId/1 OL9 XOB Od 3/W3AY N/V!N/10M N1XCN Dl{{ °' 30Nb2/O S1031/H02/b' NOl1 b2~lOdZl00 JNl1 b2/3d0 S/M37 `~~ .o-.l=.>n 37v7S M31i13LN'JIS30/1N3Wd073i130) b'lN2lOdl7b'O {b'JNOWt/O/70 OHONb2/ `// blb'[/v 730 ~~_ .e .0 0 {ooz ezisn~nv surly jS EL6'0 b9Nb'JN107/n87V101 Ntf7d 2/0074 ON003S - 9Z JN107//19 Q _ - oY~ k - r ~~ ~ ry xl R~1 ~1 ~~"~'~ en ~, ~~, ~ ~ _~~4~ 'I Iil 9 9 ~5 _e ~ ppp~~ ~ ~ ~ ^o ~k ~ yV 36s a C Q f C O ~~}~ n a ~ ''~ e~1 y3a:E ~UE.a~-,aV,gg 7 ~ U ~ 5 ;:1e.64' H < B afc'" yyk.k f WF`o p.'<.o YY z ~ W ~~ s:~St33 g zwQa`=,sp ~"~z ~ ~~$ F U ~ -~ --- ~_~~~ sa -~..~ P1~II~11Y_S- ~- ~ ;. xnn ~ ~ ~-_ ~ -~~~ r ova _ &-IIIQi HWd fRq Wd 7WHJ6 NOANYJ d1AAW i non . eR ~ YY „V - o .t ~p a b Y S ySy e ~ ~°s ~Y 8 3° ~- ~ 8 ~~ ~j;__ 8g,..,..,e_e° r c ~~ ~;' L ~I G~ i I I I i~ I I ~ s~-~ .'~- ~-- _~ ~~ N~~_.~~ Y i ~ \~ N~1 ~ /. X~ i~ s" % / I ) I,IIIYrI~~~ 1' II P~ '~ tih f I~ \~~~ . ~ .~6~ :~~ ~~ I ,s2~ __ _ -~ - ~ 1 ' , I __---, y ~pgTl i I u-f _J - ~- I • 1 l ~ `I Y 1 1 ~ 1' ~ f L ,_'A`` 1 1 1 -- 1 I 1 ~ I I 1 1 I _ _ • ~ _ I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 ~ _ ~ I \ 1 ~~ _-~ 1 I - `~ _ -- I ~ n DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7.30 p m Debra Meier October 2, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16217 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES -A proposed tentative tract map consisting of 1-lot for multi-family residential, on 8.66 acres of land within the Medum-High Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue south of West Greenway Park -APN: 1077-422-028. Related file. DRC2001-00407 DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2001-00407 - LEW IS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES -The review of detailed site plan and bwlding elevations for Tentative Tract 16217, consisting of 166 multi-family apartment units on 8.66 acres in the Medium-High Residential Distnd (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue, south of West Greenway Park -APN 1077-0421-028. Related file. SUBTT16217. Design Parameters• This protect application is the proposed completion of the Del Mar apartment complex, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue north of Church Street. The first phase of this protect is now more than ten years old The expansion and completion of the protect will be architecturally compatible instyle and theme; however, not identical to the existing structures The new recreation and leasing budding is intended to provide amenities for both phase of the protect to entoy. The site is adtacent to the West Greenway Park; therefore, open fenang, and strategically located gates will provide access for the residents to the park site and the West Greenway Trail As with the other multi-family protects in Terra Vista, the Planned Community receives 50 percent credit for the open space amenities provided v~nthin this parcel The area for which open space credit is granted shall be identified on the Tentative Tract Map at the Ume of protect approval Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion 1 The protect shall be unified with the existing portion of the site through use of consistent landscape materials, street furniture, (lighting, etc) and budding materials and color Staff will provide photographs of the existing protect in order for the Committee to compare these details between the two phases of the protect 2 The open parking is concentrated on the southern portion of the protect. We have suggested to the applicant that open parking should be evenly distributed throughout the site The applicant has responded by stating that their obtective was to purposely skew the available open parking to the south so that it is available for use by the residents of Del Mar I In addition, the applicant has indicated that they have provided parking in excess of the minimum requred in order providing this additional parking for Del Mar I However, the parking calculation provided on the plan indicates the 351 spaces have been provided, while 343 spaces are required. This is only an increase of 8 spaces, which adds little in the way of carrying out their stated obtective Staff recommends that the parking be more evenly distributed throughout the protect Portions of the site have no open parking within convenient access of the unit Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the committee review the issues identified above, suggest any modifications with the applicant for appropriate plan revisions. DEC COMMENTS TT 16217 & DRC2001-00407 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES October 2, 2001 Page 2 Design Review Committee Action Members Present Lany McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Debra Meier Upon review of the proposed color board, as compared with the color scheme, which exists in Del Mar I, the Committee concurred that the basic budding colors were compatible however, the accent colors were not. The Committee requested that the applicant choose an accent color that was compatible with the existing project. The applicant can submit altemaUve color samples to staff for review and approval The Committee agreed with the staff identification in regard to the disthbution of visitor parking on the site. The parkng is clustered m the southerly portion of the site, providing few convenient spaces to some northern sectors of the project The Site Plan shall be modified to more evenly distribute available parking spaces throughout the site area The revised plan shall be submitted to staff and may be subject to further Committee review on a consent basis as deterrnmed by staff. The Committee concurred that the following conditions shall be placed on the protect approval: The protect shall be unified through the use of consistent street furniture, lighting fixtures, and similar site details to the extent possible 2. The project shall be unified through the use of predominant landscape materials that are consistent between both phases of the development. .-- „ , „~~-T2 ~ ~ 2Z r , ~ Crfy of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Omsron (908) 477.2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) °"~x ,~ '-~,-t _. ,jt,;. n. -. 3: •,:~e 'til } L•• ~ i4'-~. h'_".>i _'i.:~7'~`~_'4'`7+~,.zri ~~e'~`ty 4.;''.., The p'urp'os•e of~ttiis _form is`to~inform the'City~ofthe;basic~eomponentsaof~the,~proposetl~ > t' + oa --ti ip. ,,. ,,a ,a.` r °Yra~a~ ~~~ ~~~ .C.ar .ry„, r `r project~so that th'e' City, may review_tK~e project puts uant~ to~ Cityypolicies,, ortlrna~c@'s;#and;~ 3 ~rz`. r ... -vk^'.uc . a x guidelines; the Califorrira-Erivtronmental Quality'~Act; and the Ci_ty~ R"ules~and;Procedures; to Irtiplement CEQA:-_It'=is-irtiportant that fhg+informati ~ ~' ~ • ~ - ori requested in;.this~app'lication"be~ provided in full:._..,, *~ f ..,` ~ ` - .;~ ~ <~<,- - -~~- ~ ~,~, k,,,•~wti o-.:.R'``,.f-` ., ~1J w *_..z'Y-y'•. • ;p:?r -t `+.'-_ y~ ,~+_ ~,c~ s`i5h"', yti "i -F y ^, T.~-rs: °{~T.s= Ly, .~2Y .~<:"C: iiw sy~:itd s~~}:~'t.' '~S'.-a~{, ~,.s"r'"sv a~t~c~ ar~r.;..~. +;E rv~4 '.~i ~?.^,-~- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that It Is the responslblllty o/the applicant to ensure that the application Is complete at the time o/ submittal, Clty staff wdl not be available to per/orm work requl2d to provide missing In/ormahon Application Number /or the pro/ect to which this loan pertains . Protect Del Mar II nne Name & Addross olpro/ect LDC Couoar, LLC owner(s) 1156 North Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91785 Name&Addressoldeveloperorpro/ect Lewis Apartment Communities sponsor 1156 North Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91785 ContacrPerson& Christopher Greiner Addmss Lewis Apartment Communities 1156 North Mountain Avenue • Upland, CA 91785 C~ D 23 Name 8 Address o/person preparing this /orm (~f d~f/erent from above) Telephone Number 909-946-7526 A Information indicated by asterisk (') ~s not n=gwred of nonconstruchon CUP=s unless otherwise requested by stab '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide aset o/color photographs whrch show representative wews into the srte from the north, south, east and west, views into and /rom the site from the primary access points which serve the sde, and reprosentatrve views o/srgnrficant /eatures /rom the site Include a map showing location o/each photograph 3) Protect Location (describe) West of Milliken, North of Church, North of Del Mar I, East of Coyote Canyon School, South of West Greenway Park n LJ LJ 4) Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (attach adddional sheet ~/ necessary) 1077-422-40 '5) GrossSrteArea(adsq R) 9 53 acr s 'S) Net Sde Ala (total site srze minus area o/public streets 8 proposed dedications) 8.66 acres 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the pro/ect ste (attach add~bonal sheet r/necessary 2`'~ 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City o/Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to Tully implement the pro/ect Building permits, Grading permits, Improvement permits 9JDescnbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the pro/ect including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, matun: trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and cond~t~on) and the use o(the structures Attach photographs of signficant featun;s described In addition, site all sources of information (~ e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) Relatively flat Graded to suoerpad condition in Terra Vista rough grade (1984) Silty fine sand underlain by alluvial sand, gravel and cobbles Drainage through storm drain connection at Southwest corner of site No structures, trees or animals Source: Richard Mills and Associates, Inc. (Soils) 10)Descnbe the known cultural anrUOrhistoncalaspects o/the site Srte all sources ofinformahon (books, published reports and oral history) Formerly used as a vineyard C~ D 2S 11)Descnbe any noise sources and therrlevels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses • Traffic noise from Milliken Avenue. A noise study to be completed. 12)Descnbe the pmposed protect in detail This should prowde an adequate descnpbon o/the site in terms of ultimate use which will result from the proposed pm/ect Indicate d there are pmposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) it necessary Please see attached 13)Descnbe the surrounding propeRies, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (rosidenhal, commeroial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apaRment houses, shops, department stores, etc J and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) North: Trail to Coyote Canyon School adjacent, single family beyond South• Apartments adiacent zoned hioh density South of Church (vacant) East• Milliken Park adiacent zoned medium-high density beyond (vacant) West: Coyote Cannon School adiacent, apartments and single family beyond 14) X11 the proposed pm/ect change the pattern, scale or character o/the surrounding general ama of the pmfect~ No, this proiect will conform to the Terra Vista Community Development Plan • ~Q 15)Indicate the type o(shoR-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of sound proofing am proposed Short term noise: Construction activity mitigated throw h limited working hours Long term noise: Minimal site related long term noise to be mitigated through landscapi '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature orscenic trees No mature or scenic trees on-site 17) Indicate any bodes of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drams No water on-site 18J lnd~cate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please contact fhe Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Resrdenhal(gaUdayJ_400 x 166 = 66,400 Peak use(gaUDay) 66,400 x 2 = 132,800 b Commero~aUlnd (gaUday/ac) Peak use (gaUmrNac) 19)Ind~cate proposed method o/sewage disposal Septic Tank X Sewer /(sephc tanks are pmposed, attach peroolahon tests ll discharge to a sanitary sewage system is pmposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For /wither clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987- 2591 a Resident~al(gaUday) 200 x_166 = 33,200 b CommeroiaUlnd (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS. 20) Number o/ residential units Detached (indicate range o/ paroel saes, minimum lot size and maximum lot N/A size C~ C~ O 2`~ ~ ~ni neuuurn ns~ni Arno„c~rnr iuTro~unTr+n. ,mm~ o..... Attached (indicate whetherunrts are rental or /or sale units) 166 rental Unl t5 • 21)Anhcrpated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to $ Rent(permonth) $ 1,225 to $ 1,775 22) Speaty number of bedrooms by and type 155 - 2 Bedroom units; 11 x 3 Bedroom units 23J Indicate ant~c~pated household srze by unit type Two (~ RPdronm 2.5 Pn rcon~hoiicPhold Three (3) Bedroom 3 person/household 24)Ind~cate the expected numbero/school children who wdl be residing within the protect Contact the appropnate School Drstncts as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary 76 b JunrorH~gh Included in Elementary c SenrorHrgh 33 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and ma/or function(s) of commercial, mdustnal or mshtuhonal uses 26) Total floor area of commeraal, mdustnal, or mshtuhonal uses by • type C~ ~ 2~b 27) Indicate hours of operation 28) Number o/ Total employees Maximum Shdt _ Time of Maximum Shift 29)Prov~de breakdown of ant~c~patedlo6 class(cations, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hero for each c/ass~(cabon (attach addrt~onal sheet ~f necessary) 30) Estimation of the number o/workers to be hired that currently resde in the Gty '31)For commercial and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount o/air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management D~stnct, at (818) 572-6283) ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, Bn=, and flood control agenaes serving the pro/ect been contacted to determine their abdrty to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ecty If so, please indicate their response Water and sewer - CCWD to provide Will Serve letters Flood -Per agreement with Flood Control (c. 1982 • Fire -Oral confirmation ~~ ~ 2`~ In the known history o/this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals 33)Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB=s, radioactive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known None 34JWill the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above I/yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment auras, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cabon plans I hen:by cerhry that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation o/this pro/ect to the best o/my ability, that the /acts, statements, and information pn:sented are true and correct tot he bes of my knowledge and belief I further understand that adddional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City, of Rancho Cucamonga Date 7 /1 ~~ Signature ~/~X/ G'~//~/~lJl~/-~_-'/~ / /~ Title /ISS•f~'Y r~rcL~ U~'v'~~'r~ ~^°e9c`l C~ c~ 030 • BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16217 and Development Review DRC2001-00407 2. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 16217 (SUBTT16217) - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A proposed tentative tract map consisting of 8 lots for multi-family residential apartments, on 8 66 acres of land within the Medwm-High Residential density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Commurnty Plan, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue south of West Greenway Park APN 1077-422-40 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00407 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES -The rewew of detailed site plan and building elevations for Tentative Tract 16217, consisting of 166 multi-family apartment urnts on 8 66 acres in the Medwm-High Residential Density (14-24 dwelling unds per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue, south of West Greenway Park APN 1077-0421-40 Related • File SUBTT16217 3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Lewis Apartment Communities 1156 North Mountain Avenue Upland CA 91785 4. General Plan Designation: Medwm-High (14-24 dwelling units per acre) 5. Zoning: Terra Vista Community Plan -Medwm-High Density (14-24 dwelling urnts per acre) 6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Tentative Tract 16217 is located in the southwest quadrant of the Terra Vista Community Plan Surrounding land uses inGude the Del Mar Apartments located immediately to the south (MH), Coyote Canyon School and West Green Way Park located west and north respectively, and Milliken Paris located on the east side of Milliken Avenue The east boundary of the site is formed by Milliken Avenue, which is improved with curb and gutter across the frontage of the site The site is relatively flat and previously graded in 1984 to a "superpad" condition, and as a result of continuous weed control and disking, no significant vegetation remains on the site 7. Lead Agency Name and Address: • City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C1 ~ 3~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 8. Contact Person and Phone Number: Debra Meier, AICP, Contract Planner (909) 477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, Involving at least one impact that Is °Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ()Land Use and Planning lx) Transportahon/Ciroulahon ()public Seances ()Population and Housing () &ological Resources () Utilities and Seance Systems (x) Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources (x) Aesthetics (x) Water ()Hazards (x) Air Quali (x) Noise (x) Cultural Resources ry x Mandato Rndm s of Si ni6cance U Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this irntial evaluation• A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed /~~~~ I~' N'~ `~~' `x:G(/ ~ Debra Meier, AICP Contract Planner October 29, 2001 • • C,~ Q 32 Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is regwred for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the sigrnficant effects identified PMmUaOy S~gnfiUnl Inpatl Lw Issues and Supporting Information Sources '°""~"y 9gnlfimnl u""~ MN~tlon '"a" SpNfimnl No I C Inm IeE I C I ci 1. LAND USEAND PLANNING. Would the proposal a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (X) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (X) pollees adopted by agencies with tunsdiction over the prolect~ c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (X) wcinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (X) established community Comments: a-d) The proposed project is designed in conformance with all applicable standards and gwdelines of the Terra Vista Community Plan No increase in budding density or Plan Amendment is proposed Polmlully SlgNfimnl Irryacl Leis Issues and Su ortmn Information Sources PP 9 Pol°"tlally Sigrvfi®nl u""ss MNgstlan '"'" SIyYfi®ni No liryaq Inm~w2teE 1 tl I 2. POPULATION ANDHOl1SWG. Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (X) population prolections~ b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly () () () (X) or indirectly (e g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, espeaally affordable () () () (X) housing? Comments: a-c) Construction activities will be short-term and wdl not attract new employees to the area The proposed subdivision will result in new residents to the area, however, the proposed density of development has been antiapated since the adoption of the Terra Vista Community Plan in 1983 The site is void of existing structures and wdl not impact existing housing units C) 0 33 Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Paenaally 5~9nficant Inpaa Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Pmanually 9pNM1Cant unless MNQdoon man Sipnflwra No I act Into area I I 3. GEOLAGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? () () () (X) b) Seismic ground shaking? () () (X) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? () () () (X) d) Seiche hazards? () () () (X) e) Landslides or mudflows? () () () (X) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable sod () () (X) ( ) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the lands () () (X) ( ) h) Expansive sods? () () () (X) i) Unique geologic or physical features? () () () (X) Comments• a-c) No known earthquake faults pass through the site; it is not in an Algwst-Paolo Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Specal Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fault. The Red Hdl Fault passes within approximately 1 Yz miles north and west of the sde, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4flfz miles northerly. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is approximately 14 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of producng Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. The site is located on stable soils, which are typically not subject to liquefaction. Adherence to the Uniform Budding Code will ensure the geologic impacts are less than significant on residential construction. d) The site is not located near a body of water e-f) The site has a relatroely gentle grade, so landslides or mudflows are not likely to occur and grading will be regwred only to create proper drainage and development of appropriate budding pad areas g-h) The General Plan (Figure V-2) indicates that the site is located within the Tujunga- Delhi sod assoaation. These sods are typically excessively drained, moderately sloping sods formed on alluvial fans. This sod association may have sod bearing capabilities that could limit some development Structures proposed on this soil type are permitted only after asite-specrfic sods investigation has been performed that indicates that the sods can adequately support the weight of the proposed structure Standard Conditions of approval will require asite-specific sods investigation prior to issuance of budding permits, by the Building and Safety Division. The resulting impact is not considered significant. The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. C~ a 3~ • Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Poten4ally Sgrofionl Irtp9tl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources av~enfi"; w4~ 1G ~n s~~,fim~, No I tl In lee ~ h ~ tl 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or () () (X) ( ) the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (X) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of () () () (X) surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes m the amount of surface water m any () () () (X) water body e) Changes m currents, or the course or direction of () () () (X) water movements f) Change m the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (X) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an agwfer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? () () () (X) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (X) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater () () () (X) otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a) The protect is expected to result m changes m absorption rates and dramage pattern. The three sides of the site perimeter are bound by improved streets, including curbs and gutters The site slopes gently from north to south at less than 2-percent gradient A dramage study indicating how storm water will be directed to the existing storm drams m the immediate area must be approved by the City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits b) The site is not located within a 100-year flood plain c-e) The protect site is not located near a body of water f-i) The project will not alter the course or direction of groundwater, nor have any contact with groundwater which would impact groundwater quality C~ 0 `~S Irntial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Po~OnOdly SiprvficOnf leryect Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources s°'~,fi";;,; p M~"' ~, W pNficant s.'"'" NO I Inca e0 I ~ n 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an () (X) () ( ) existing or protected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? () (X) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (X) cause any change in climate d) Create obtectionable odors? () () () (X) Comments• a) The proposed protect was screened using Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unrfied Air Pollution Control Distract, the Ventura County Au Pollution Control Distract, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects. The cnteraa pollutants screened for included: reactive organic gases (ROG), ndrous oxides (NO^), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o). Two of these, ROG and NO„ are ozone precursors. Default values were used where protect specific information was unavailable. Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Instdute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6th Edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the purely residential nature of the proposed protect, the defauR fleet mix was modified to decrease the number of medium to heavy-duty diesel trucks and increase the number of light passenger vehicles. Wood stoves and wood burning fireplaces were deleted as inappropriate home heating sources in this region. The protect operational emissions do not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of signrficance (Table 2). However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mdigation measures, will be used to minimize the protect contnbution to regional emission of cntena pollutants. Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NO^ CO PM,o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet. Mit. Unmet. Met Gradin 1.77 177 24.38 2316 - - 22.36 815 Worker Tn s 0 49 0 49 0.69 0.69 1.31 1.31 0.13 0.13 Stationa E w 0 34 0 34 0.27 0.27 - - 0.02 0.02 Mobile E w 2 72 2.58 23 76 22 57 - - 1.99 1.89 Arch Coatin s 67.51 6413 - - - - - - As halt 1.31 1.24 - - - - - - Totals 7414 70.47 4911 46.70 131 131 24.50 10.19 SCAQMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No • C~ Go ~ CJ Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) r~ Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet. Met Unmet. Mit. Unmet Met Unmet Met Area Source 8.22 8 20 1 25 1 02 0.53 0 43 0.00 0.00 Mobile Source 22.77 22 77 17 32 17 32 187 14 187 14 8.93 8.93 Totals 30.99 30.97 18 57 18 34 187.67 187.57 8 93 8.93 SCAOMDThres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si mficance No No No No No No No No Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAOMD thresholds dunng grading actiwties for PM,o and NO^, nor SCAOMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NO^ Tables 1 and 2 show protect impacts before and after mdigation measures have been implemented. Sensdive receptors in the area include an apartment complex to the south and Coyote Canyon school to the west. Durng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) wdl be generated However, the proposed protect wdl be completed in one phase and, any impacts to these sensitive receptors from generation of fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403. 2) Streets surrounding the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. r1 b) During construction, exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and egwpment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and egwpment traveling over exposed surfaces wdl increase NOx and PM,o levels in the area. Table 1 shows a summary of construction emissions with and without mitigation measures. The following mitigation measures wdl ensure impacts to sensitive receptors will be at less than significant levels 1) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shail ensure the construction grading plans C) 0 3~- Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 2) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 3) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 4) Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt. Structural painting shall be spread out over a period of 50 days or more. c-d) The proposed prolect includes the construction of 166 multi-family apartment units on an 8 66-acre lot in one phase. The end use of the proposed residential prolect will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. ~~~r sum ~.a lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources. @°fi°~8°„ ~ ~~, s,~ No i en trico gee i i 6. TRANSPORTATIOWCIRCULATION. Would the proposal result w• a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) e) f) 9) Insuffiaent parking capacity on-site or off-site Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? Conflicts with adopted alternative transportation bicycle racks)? Rail or air traffic impacts policies supporting (e g , bus turnouts, () (X) () () () () () () () (X) () (X) U (X) () (X) O (X) () (X) Comments: a-f) The proposed multi-family residential apartments will generate approximately 996 trips per day (an average of 6 trips per day per household). The land use is consistent with the Terra Vista Community Plan, including the required master plan street improvements and related facilities In the immediate area. Traffic Impacts were addressed in the certified EIR prepared for the Terra Vista Community Plan. In order to address project specific impacts the applicant will be required to: 1) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue with the project entry. LJ ~1 LJ C~ D 3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 Page 9 At the time of building permit issuance, the applicant is required to pay Traffic Impact Fees as established by the City Council to offset the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect g) Located over 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is northerly of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft raenwuy Spvfionl Irryaa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ao amp"; ~~~ s~ nl N" I a Into tail I a I a 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result ~n impacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (X) habitats (including, but not limited to. plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated species (e g., hentage trees, () () () (X) eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e g., () () () (X) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )? d) Wetland habitat (e g , marsh, npanan, and veinal () () () (X) pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration wrridors? () () () (X) Comments: a) The site is not within an identified habitat area for any endangered species Native vegetation was cleared from the site in 1984 and annual weed and erosion control measures have been undertaken annually since that time b-c) Although previously in vineyard cultivation, the site was graded to a "superpad" condition in 1984 when much of Terra Vista was rough graded There are no existing trees or structures on the site. d) There are no npanan or wetland habitats on-site e) The site is undeveloped However, development in the vicinity has eliminated any wildlife comdors that may have occurred in the past rmenueliy SpiufiGenl Inpaa less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~m;,; ~ ~,`~,,, am limn, No I a m lee I a I a 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? () () () (X) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (X) inefficient manner? ~~ 0 3~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments: a-b) The protect will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The site is not designated by State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-2 AND Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact. vo~a,uwy 9pnfiwrn ~Rwc+ ua Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~8°~„ ,~~~, s ,,, i i~ ~ ~ 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal rnvo/ve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (X) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to• oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response () () () (X) plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (X) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential () () () (X) health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (X) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a-e) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses other than the prior vineyard cultivation. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored soils is observed. There is no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping or refuse on-site. Prnemwy s~w+r~~ i~ i ... Issues and Supporting Information Sources. a ~ ~~, ~ ~"°,~,,,, N, ~ Inca ed ~ 1 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result gyn. a) Increases in existing noise levels? () (X) () ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? () (X) () ( ) Comments: a) The primary existing noise source in the protect area is transportation corridors. Traffic along Milliken Avenue is the predominant source contributing to the ambient noise level in the area. Construction of the proposed protect would potentially result in relatively high noise levels and annoyance at the closest residences. The following measures, as ~~ ~ y~ r1 LJ r~ I`J u Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 required by the Development Code, would reduce short-term construction- related noise impacts associated with the proposed project: 1) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. 2) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted nose is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 4) During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. b) The proposed on-site residential dwellings would be exposed to traffic noise level • potential exceeding the 65 CNEL standard in outdoor activity areas; and 45 CNEL standard for interior liwng space, as specified in the General Plan An Acoustical Analysis was prepared by Gordon Bracken and Assoaates, dated October 15, 2001; mitigation measures recommended in that report are included below. 1) In order to mitigate exterior noise levels along Milliken Avenue the project proponent will be required to provide a 7-foot high sound barrier around second floor patios/balconies, for all dwellings and/or rooms facing Milliken Avenue (Buildings 10.1, 10-2, 10.17, 10-18, 14-8 and 14-9). All first floor patios along the sides of these buildings (90 degree exposure to Milliken Avenue) will require sound barriers at least 6 feet in height; and second floor patios balconies along these side elevations will require sound barriers at least 5 feet in height. 2) The required noise control barriers can be constructed of any of the following: masonry block, stucco on wood frame, 3/4-inch plywood, 1/4-inch glass or 1/2-inch Lexan, earthen berm, or any combination of these materials or other material with a surface weight of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot. 3) In order to mitigate interior noise levels along Milliken Avenue, the project proponent will be required to provide STC 36 glazing to all rooms of the units facing Milliken Avenue from buildings 10.1, 10.2, 10.17, 10.18, 14-8 and 14-9; and, STC 32 glazing shall be added to all rooms of the units with only a side view of Milliken Avenue from these same buildings. 4) All buildings adjacent to Milliken Avenue shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation (air conditioning system) and/or a "summer switch" and outside ducting to the forced air unit. C~ ~ ~\ Initial Study for Tentatwe Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Pgentally Sgrofionl btpacl Less Issues and Su ortln Information Sources PP g Potentially $ipnfimnt Unless Abbpiban Then Sgnifimnt No I ct In lee I cl I d 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services m any of the following areas• a) Fire protections () () () (X) b) Police protections () () () (X) c) Schools () () () (X~ d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () () (X) e) Other governmental services () () () (X) Comments• a-e) Fire Protection -The site, located on Milliken Avenue north of Church Street, will be served by a fire station located near Base Line Road east of Day Creek Cha nnel or Milliken Avenue near Banyan Avenue. Standard Conditions of Approval of the Uniform Building and Fire Codes are placed upon prolect approval Police Protection -The proposed residential subdivision will incrementally increase the need for routine police protection services, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedule adopted by the City Council Schools -The proposed prolect is located within the Terra Vista Community, which has agreements with the affected school distracts to fund school construction Parks -The proposed prolect is located within the Terra Vista Community, which has a Park Implementation Agreement approved by the City Council, through which park sites are developed for the entire Community Plan area. Public Facilities -The proposed residential subdivision would incrementally increase traffic on adjacent streets, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedule adopted by the City Council Potentially Sipnfitant eryacl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources sPo,o'Mn®I'; Mum ao Invent No I tl In teo 1 tl I 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result ~n a need for new systems or supplies or substantial atterahons to the following utdrt~es: a) Power or natural gasp () () () (X) b) Communication systems? () () () (X) . c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (X) faciliUes~ d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (X) c.~ o y2 Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal g) Local or regional water supplies Comments: U O U (X) a-g) The proposed residential subdivision will include the construction of 166 multi-family apartment residences. The proposed development will extend as necessary existing utilities into the site as a condition of development The proposed protect will not require mafor modification or akerations to the existing utility infrastructure in the immediate area. • Potemlelly Sptlfieem Inpecl LBa9 Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pa",uwy u"~, ,n,,. s~m+ar.~n ~auweo~ sa~rK,m NO ~ ~n~ ~~ i ~ 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic wsta or scenic highways () () () (X) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () () (X) c) Create light or glare? () () (X) ( ) Comments• a-b) The proposed residential subdiwsion is located adfacent to Milliken Avenue, Coyote Canyon School, and West Green Park and Trail, and must be developed in conformance with the landscape and streetscape guidelines of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Milliken Avenue Beautification Master Plan The proposed residential apartment buildings will be reviewed and approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Review Committee prior to Planning Commission approval. c) The proposed prolect development will increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. Because of the nature of existing residential and commercial development in the area surrounding the site, the impacts of IighUglare will not be signdicant Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Pwanu,~iy u"~ ,nan Sip"fiee" wtlpetlan SIpnllcaril NO • 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal. a) Disturb paleontological resources () () () (X) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (X) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () (X) ( ) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change () () () (X) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the () () () (X) potential impact area? CI D '-~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Comments: a-e) Although no cultural resources have been observed during previous grading and site maintenance, additional grading on the site may expose or unearth historic cultural resources As the site Is approximately 8.6 acres in size and the surrounding area has previously been developed, the likelihood of unearthing cultural resources is mammal and impacts are, therefore, considered to be less than significant. In the event that any such resources are discovered, the contractor will be regwred to contact the owner of the site and the San Bernardino County Museum for the proper recovery, removal, or documentation PotentlaYy SONRCam I"ipecl Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~ .augur oNneam uNaq, wnoauo" rnaa saN~ No i ae i 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional ( ) parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) Comments• () () (X) () () (X) a) The proposed development of 166 multi-family apartment homes will incrementally increase the use of existing parks within Terra Vista; however, the City Council adopted a Park Implementation Agreement, which sets standards for park development within Terra Vista. b) The proposed protect is located easterly of the West Green Way Park and westerly of the Milliken Park, both of which are within walking distance of the site. The proposed protect will not negatively impact the use or enjoyment of any of the existing parks within Terra Vista or the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Pawmmry s+uNn~.ai Iapacl Lass Issues and Su rtrn Information Sources. PPo 9 Pm.anaoy apr.ucam uNas Lcuoaum '"°" s~.earx No ~ Inco ad ~ I 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major penods of California history or prehistory? r~ I~ ~ ~ y~1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 Page 15 b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential to () () (X) ( ) achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively beef, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that () () () (X) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (X) environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments: a) The site is not within an identified habitat area for any endangered species. Native . vegetation was cleared from the site in 1984 At that time, the vineyard was removed and the site was graded to a "superpad" condition. Annual erosion and weed control measures have been undertaken annually since that time. There are no existing trees or structures remaining on the site. b) The protect site is approximately 8.6 acres in size and grading will entail establishing proper drainage and residential bwlding pads suitable for future single-family development Although the short-term construction activities may result in dust and noise which may be noticeable to existing residents in the immediate area, significant impacts are avoided through implementation of erosion control and dust suppression measures c) The proposed protect does not have impacts that are indrndually limited, but cumulatively considerable. The site is within the Terra Vista Community Plan, which permits residential density in the range of 14-24 dwelling units per acre at this site. The Initial Study did not identify any impacts that could not be mitigated through the City's Standard Conditions of Approval d) The proposed development on 8.6 acres would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The site is located on a Medwm-High Density Residential parcel along Milliken Avenue south of West Greenway Corndor. n f-~ G ~ y~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00124 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for rewew in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (X) General Plan EIR (CertifiedApnl6, 1981) (X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (X) Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCH #81082808, certfed February 16, 1983) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that t am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature (~ ~ /~ Date /D 2 S o/ Print Name and Title (iy~C/STdP,f~CJe ~%,f/f1r? A~T~~~G~. i G ~ `~~ U City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16217 and Development Review DRC2001-00407 Public Review Period Closes: November 28, 2001 Prolect Name: Project Applicant: Lewis Apartment Commun~hes Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the west side of Milliken Avenue south of West Greenway Park - APN 1077-422-40 Project Description: A proposed tentaWe tract map consisting of 7 lots plus 1 lettered lot for open space and recreation purposes for multi-family residential and the review of detailed sile plan and bwlding elevations for 166 apartment unils on 8 66 acres of land wdhin the Medium-High Residential density (14-24 dwelling unils per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan FINDING This rs to advise that the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an • Initial Study to detennine "d the project may have a signficant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The In~6al Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The In~4al Study identified potentially sigrnficant effects but (1) Revisions m the proled plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment H adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The projectfile and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration dunng the review penod • November 28.2001 Date of Determination Adopted By C~ o y~ RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16217, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 8 66 ACRES OF LAND INTO? LOTS FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSESAND 1 LETTERED LOT FOR OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PURPOSES IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE SOUTH OF WEST GREENWAY PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-422~t0 A Recitals 1 Lewis Apartment Communities filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16217, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 28th day of November 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on November 28, 2001, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to property bounded by Milliken Avenue on the east, with the northerly and westerly boundary formed by West Greenway Park and Trail and Coyote Canyon School, Milliken Avenue is improved with curb, gutter, and street pavement, and b The property to the north of the subject site is west Greenway Trail and single-family residential (Tract 15526), the property to the south consists of an apartment complex referred to as Del Mar (Tract 13270), the property to the east is Milliken Avenue and Milliken Park, and the property to the west includes West Greenway Park and Coyote Canyon School, and c The project contains 7 lots for condommwm purposes and 1 lettered lot to identify land reserved for pnvate open space and recreation purposes, and d The protect site is subject to noise levels of 65 CNEL along Milliken Avenue, which • can be mitigated to acceptable levels per the Noise Study prepared for the protect, and e The project will generate traffic tnps which can be accommodated through public street improvement upgrades as conditioned herein, and C~ fl y~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TT16217 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES November 28, 2001 Page 2 f The protect is consistent with the General Plan Medum-High Residential land use designation (14-24 dwelling urnts per acre) with a proposed protect density of 19 17 dwelling units per acre, and g The proposed protect of 166 multi-family residential dwellings is in accordance vnth the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the Medium-High Residential District In addition, the proposed protect is in accordance with obtectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan, and h The proposed project conforms to the standards and regulations of the Development Code, as well as the Terra Vista Community Plan, in terms of setbacks, bwlding separation, parking, and the provision of recreational amenities as noted in the staff report, and i The proposed protect and the intended use, together vnth all Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity The protect proponents are required to complete all missing parkway improvements adjacent to the site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speafic plans, and b The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems, and f The design of the tentative tract wdl not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the • California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the appiication C~ fl ~h PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TT16217 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES • November 28, 2001 Page 3 b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect wilt have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) In accordance with the Park Implementation Plan, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16217 shall be credited with 36 acre toward the overall obligations for park development within Terra Vista Engineering Division 1) Provide Class II Bike Lane along Milliken Avenue frontage 2) Install a traffic signal at Milliken Avenue and the protect entry dnveway 3) Upgrade the project entry dnveway for ADA accessibility 4) Design of park access and perimeter wall shall be coordinated with Engineering Division Park Planner Environmental Mitigation Measures TRANSPORTATION 1) In order to address protect speafic impacts, the applicant will be regwred to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue with the protect entry NOISE 1) During all protect site excavation and grading, the protect contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards ~~ 0 50 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TT16217 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES November 28, 2001 • Page 4 2) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the protect site 3) The construction contractor shall locate egwpment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the protect site dunng all protect construction 4) Dunng all protect site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m , Monday through Saturday No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays 5) In order to mitigate extenor noise levels along Milliken Avenue, the protect proponent will be regwred to provide a 7-foot high sound bamer around second floor patios/balconies, for all dwellings and/or rooms facing Milliken Avenue (Buildings 10-1, 10-2, 10-17, 10-18, 14-8, and 14-g) All first floor patios along the sides of these bwidings (90-degree exposure to Milliken Avenue) will require sound bamers at least 6 feet in height, and second floor patios/balconies along these side elevations will requre sound bamers at least 5 feet in height 6) The regwred noise control bamers can be constructed of any of the following masonry block, stucco on wood frame, 3/4-inch plywood, 1/4-inch glass or 1/2-inch Lexan, earthen berm, or any combination of these matenals or other matenal with a surface weight of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot 7) In order to mitigate intenor noise levels along Milliken Avenue, the protect proponent will be required to provde STC 36 glazing to all rooms of the units facng Milliken Avenue from Bwldmgs 10-1, 10-2, 10-17, 10-18, 14-8 and 14-g, and, STC 32 glazing shall be added to all rooms of the units with only a side view of Milliken Avenue from these same buldings 8) All buildings adtacent to Milliken Avenue shall be egwpped with mechanical ventilation (air conditioning system) and/or a "summer switch" and outside ducting to the forced air unit AIR QUALITY 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 2) Streets surrounding the site shall be swept according to a schedule . established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction G° s` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO TT16217 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES • November 28, 2001 Page 5 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to mirnmize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energyeffiaency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean-alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipmentwhen not in use 8) Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt Structural painting shall be spread out overa penod of 50 days or more 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of November 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS CJ ~ 5Z City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract 16217/DRC2001-00407 This Mitigation Morntonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implemen~ng the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and venficetion has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported . 3 The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible gwdelines As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation ~nnll be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C~ O S~ Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 r1 L_J 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forrns for an impact issue requinng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unantiapated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planneror responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance vnth a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessaryfunds (or otherforms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor Cdy staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time In those instances requinng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation actrvities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identifythe reporteras an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the Citys MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits r1 L_J ~~ o sy s • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) s Project File No.: SUBTT16217/DRC2001-00407 Applicant: Lewls Aoartment Commurntles Initial Study Prepared by: Debra Meter. AICP Date: October 25. 2001 .. - .. .. . ° -. .. Norse _ - :- ,, -- »• ~...~1,wr.~,r ;3. ~, "_ ,- ~~r~-,..•~~gy ~ti* ~ t~r.['~9r7n J tf .. '~"a.> r~y'ted+~°'~t""`,:u x`, ~';•-:'"~' •~ ~ - , 7unng all excavation and grading, the contractors shall egwp all CP . r . :onsWchon egwpment, fixed or mobile, with propedy operating and A Inspections dunng q q namtamed mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards censWction The contractor shall place all stationary consWction egwpment so that CP C Inspections dunng A q emdted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the construction protect site The contractor shall locete equipment staging in areas that volt create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the CP C Inspections dunng q 4 noise-sensitive receptors nearest the sde dunng censWction consWction Dunng consWCtion, the contractor shall limit all consWction related CP C Inspection dunng q 4 actiwhes that would result in high noise level to between the hours of censWction 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m Monday through Saturday No censtruction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holida s y To mitigate extenor noise levels along Milliken Avenue the prged CP C proponent volt be required to provide a 7-foot high sound bamer Plan review and final C 2 around second Floor patios/balconies, for all dwelling and/or rooms acoustical report faang Milliken Avenue (Bwldings 10-1, 10-2, 10-17, 10-18 14-8 and , , 14-g) All first Floor patios along the sides of these buildings (90 degree exposure to Milliken Avenue) will requve sound barners at least 6 feet I height, and second Floor patioslbalconies along these side elevations volt regmre sound bamers at least 5 feet In height. The requred noise control barriers can be consWcted of any of the folloHnng masonry block, stucco on wood frame,'/. inch plywood, CP C Plan rewew and final C 2 inch glass or %, inch Lexan, earthen berm or any combination of acoustical report These or other matenal with a suAace weight of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot In order to mitigate interior noise levels along Milliken Avenue the protect proponent will be required to provde STC 36 glaLng to all Cp C Plan review and foal rooms of the units forting Milliken Avenue from buldings 10-i, 10.2, acous6pl report C 2 10-17, 10-18, 14-8 and 14-g, and STC 32 glanng shall be added to all rooms of the units with only a side view of Milliken Avenue from these same bwldmgs All buildings adtacent to Milliken Avenue shall be egwpped with CP C mechanipl ventilation (an cendiaoning system) and/or a "summer C 2 svntch"and outside ducting to the forced av unit Plan rewew and final acoustipl report l `U "D .. , - .. ~ ... -. , ~ -. . - ~ - ~. P.Ir Ovallty . - ~ ~ - T r • • y • • t ~ ' `S"' t"x rqh`~ ~";'F.r+"' '3 «S ^ ~ ' ~.^T~ i^.»SY ~ ~tY~'Aic F + " pi a".V'n`~ ~ t, x ~ -n •-r.Et The srte shall be treated with water or other soil stab h ,. J ,u ,vi '~. , w pa' Nr rl~r~ l~r~+~s~,l.' , ec'~„k. ~ : ,'t,.a. .+ e i zrng agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to retluce PM,o CPBO C Inspectlons during A 4 emissions, in accordance wrath SCAOMD Rule 403 eonsWCbon Streets surround,ng the srte shall be swept according to a schedule establ,shed by the Gty to reduce PM,o emissions assodated with CP/CE C Inspections dunng A q vehicle tracking of soil off-site consWctlon Grading operatlons shall be suspended when vend speeds exceed 25 mph to min,mize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such CPBO C Inspectlons during A y episodes consWctlon Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to allinactlve consWCtlon areas that remain inactrve for 96 CP C Inspectlons during A hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions construction q The consWCtlon contractor shall select the equipment based on low emission factors and high-energy effiaency, and ensure that all CP C During Grading Plan C construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance q with the manufacturer's specificatlons review The consWCtlon contractor shall utilize electric or dean allematlve fuel powered egwpment where feasible CP C During Grading plan C q The construction contractor shall ensure that wnstructlon grading rewew plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use CP C Dunng Grading plan C q Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings review and asphalt SWctural painting shall be spread out over a penod of CP C 50 days or more Inspections during C q consWCtlon Transportatlon ~ ~ .. - r ri"' ;-;~ ~, . _ - v S , Install a traffic signal at the mtersectlon of Mdtlken Avenue vnth the CE B Protect Entry Dunng rewew of C t/3 Improvement plans Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monilorlnp Frequency ~ ; ; ~ ` 9 `Method of~VeMfication" w, r'.d'; ~ `r-` ~C,x t ' _ Sanctions ` CDD -Community Development Director A -With Each New Development - _ A - On-site Inspectlon ..~ 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Pennd /Approval 2 - Witlrhold Grading or Budding Permd CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWChon C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certrficete of Occupancy BO -Building Offiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports / Studies I Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating FC -Fire Chie(or designee 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP s s ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT16217 SUBJECT: TRACT 16217 APPLICANT: LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF WEST GREENWAY CORRIDOR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING COND/TIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be requved by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and irngation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign • program, and grading on file in the Planning Dmsion, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Terra Vista Community Plan Completion Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~-~. SC-04-01 1 ~ ~ J~ Protect No TT16217 Comolehon Date 2 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Bulding and Safety Dmsion to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 3 Revised site plans and bwlding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits 4 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance D. Environmental APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay far City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit _/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- E. Street Improvements Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median aike ether Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trod Island Trail Milliken Avenue x x x Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Cmi Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, pnor to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first / / -/-/. SC-04-0, 2 G ~ JLJ Protect No l'T16217 ComoleGon Date r~ Prior to any work being pertonned in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect condut shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes L~ F. • (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads regwnng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Ciry Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commeraal or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance Distract Parkway along Milliken Avenue shall conform to Beautification Master Plan A signed consent and waiver form to torn and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/_ -/-/- / / -/-/- _/-/. -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- 5~-04-0, 3 G D ~~ Protect No TT16217 Comolehon Date G. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final _/_/_ map approval or the issuance of bulding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as regwred by the City Engineer H. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, _/_/_ gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects I. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for _/_/_ all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved • SC-04-01 4 ~ ~ ~O • RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00407, IN THE MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE SOUTH OF WEST GREENWAY PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1077-422-40 A Rentals 1 Lewis Apartment Communities filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001-00407, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subiect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 28th day of November 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on November 28, 2001, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to property bounded by Milliken Avenue on the east, with the northerly and westerly boundary formed by West Greenway Paris and Trail and Coyote Canyon School, Milliken Avenue is improved with curb, gutter, and street pavement, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is west Greenway Trail and single-faintly residential (Tract 15526), the property to the south consists of the existing apartment protect known as Del Mar (Tract 13270), the property to the east is Milliken Avenue and Milliken Park, and the property to the west is Coyote Canyon School and West Greenway Park, and c The protect is located within the Medium-High Residential Distnct (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the spenfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows . a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and ~ 9 ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00407 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES November 28, 2001 . Page 2 b That the proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the wcinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Momtonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance Huth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain sigmficant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulatons, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannino Division 1) All pertinent conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16217 shall apply . 2) All retaining walls used throughout the protect shall have a decorative surface to compliment the building design ~~ fl ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00407 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES November 28, 2001 Page 3 Ern 1) 2) 3) 4) 3) Provide a reduced set (approximately 11 inches by 17 inches) of the entire development plan for the Planning Division prior to issuance of bwlding pennits 4) The garage entrance depths will be dimensioned at either less than 8 feet or greater than 18 feet Less than 18 feet regwres an automatic door opener 5) The architectural treatment (pattern and color) of the garage doors shall vary by pairs 6) Recreational amenities (and the related points given) in accordance with Development Code Section 17 08 40 H are as follows Recreation Building (1), pool/spa (1 ), large open lawn area (1), BBO nodes located throughout the project (1 ), and two tot lots with age-appropnate play equipment (1) = 5 TOTAL amenities ineenng Division Provide Class II Bike Lane along Milliken Avenue frontage Install a traffic signal at Milliken Avenue and the protect entrydnveway Upgrade the project entry dnveway for ADA accessibility Design of park access and penmeter wall shall be coordinated with Engineenng Division Park Planner Environmental Mitigation Measures TRANSPORTATION 1) In order to address protect speafic impacts, the applicant will be regwred to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue with the protect entry NOISE 1) Dunng all protect site excavation and grading, the protect contractors shall egwp all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards 2) The protect contractor shall place all stationary construction egwpment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the protect site 3) The construction contractor shall locate egwpment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the protect site dunng all protect construction G 9 ~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00407 - LEW IS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES November 28, 2001 Page 4 4) Dunng all protect site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m , Monday through Saturday No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays 5) In order to mitigate extenor noise levels along Milliken Avenue, the project proponent will be required to provide a 7-foot high sound bamer around second floor patioslbalconies, for all dwellings and/or rooms facng Milliken Avenue (Bwldings 10-1,10-2,10-17,10-18,14- 8, and 14-9) All first floor patios along the sides of these buildings (90-degree exposure to Milliken Avenue) will require sound bamers at least 6 feet in height, and second floor patios/balconies along these side elevations will require sound bamers at least 5 feet in height 6) The required noise control bamers can be constructed of any of the following masonry block, stucco on wood frame, 3/4-inch plywood, 1/4-inch glass or 1/2-inch Lexan, earthen berm, or any combination of these matenals or other matenal with a surface weight of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot • 7) In order to mitigate intenor noise levels along Milliken Avenue, the protect proponent will be regwred to provide STC 36 glazing to all rooms of the units facing Milliken Avenue from Buildings 10-1, 10-2, 10-17, 10-18, 14-8 and 14-9, and, STC 32 glazing shall be added to all rooms of the units with only a side view of Milliken Avenue from these same buildings 8) All buildings adtacent to Milliken Avenue shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation (air conditioning system) and/or a "summer switch" and outside ducting to the forced air unit A/R QUALITY 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Streets surrounding the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions C~ D lo`~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DRC2001-00407 - LEW IS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES November 28, 2001 Page 5 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energy efficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean-alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use 8) Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings and asphalt Structural painting shall be spread out over a penod of 50 days or more 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannng Commission held on the 28th day of November 2001, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS C.~ p ~s City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract SUBTT16217 and Development Review DRC2001-00407 This Mitigation Montonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Fonns to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially sigrnficant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation wdl be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planrnng Droision 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C~ D l.~ Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as detennined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requinng no further momtonng will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessaryfunds (orotherfonns of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor Citystaff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances regwnng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activties at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits c~ fl ~~- • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) • Project File No.: SUBTT16217/DRC2001-00407 Applicant: _ Lewis ADartment Communities Initial Study Prepared by: Debra Meter. AICP Date: October 25. 2001 `~ V • .. ... -. • •• . - NOISe f~ ~ ~ r'.~ ,"r • _~ z,,t", ' ' ~~';m"+}4'~>->' ~~R~' ?„ a:;h.°,° '+~ ")~i~'Y ~?~'~ y~ i~cs ~~"'~:^Y" n'+"' „hi~,; i'!',`.~~}~„"? ,°` ~ Y `, t ,. luring all excevaUOn and grading, the contractors shall egwp all CP , ; 9r M , :onsWchon equpment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and q Inspections during A 4 naintained mufflers consistent vnth manufacturers standards consWction The contractor shall place all stationary censWCtion equipment so that CP C Inspections dunng consWchon A q emitted noise is duetted away from sensitive receptors nearest the prged site The contractor shall logte equipment staging in areas thatvnll create the greatest distance between censWchon related noise and the CP C Inspections dudng A 4 noise-sensitive receptors nearest the site during consWction consWction Dunng construction, the contractor shall limit all consWction related CP C Inspection dudng A 4 activities that would result in high noise level to between the hours of censWction 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m Monday through Saturday No consWChon shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays To mitigate extenor noise levels along Mdhken Avenue the pro/ect CP C proponent will be required to prowde a 7-foot high sound barrier Plan review and Unal C 2 around second floor pahos/balcenies, for all dwelling and/or rooms acoustical report faGng Milliken Avenue (Buildings 10-1, 10-2, 10-17, 10-18, 14-8, and 14-g) All first floor patios along the sides of these buildings (90 degree exposure to Milliken Avenue) volt require sound bamers at least 6 feet I height, and second Floor patiosPoalconies along these side elevations will require sound bamers at least 5 feet in height The required noise control barriers can be consWCted of any of the follovnng masonry block, stucco on wood frame,'/.inch plywood, CP C Plan rewew and final C 2 '/. inch glass or %: inch Lexan, earthen berm or any combination of acousticel report these or other matenal vnih a surface weight of at least 3 5 pounds per square foot In order to mitigate interior noise levels along Milliken Avenue the pro/ect proponent wall be regwred to prowde STC 36 glazng to all CP C Plan rewew and final rooms of the units faang Milliken Avenue from buildings 10.1, 10-2, acoustical report C 2 10-17, 10-18, 14-8 and 14-g, and STC 32 glazing shall be added to all rooms of the uniLS with only a side view of Milliken Avenue from these same buldings All buldings ad/scent to Milliken Avenue shall be equipped with CP C mechanigl ventilation (au conditioning system) and/or a'summer ' Plan rewew and final C 2 svntch and outside ducting to the forced air unit acoustipl report - .. .. ... -, , -. .. Mr Quality ~ - . _ _ =zR~ ~ , y~~S 'i3 ~:~il~e,,.FK r .. R'.'. t_s, y~L'. .i. The site shall be treated vnth water or other soil stabilizing agent CP/BO C Inspections dudng q (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o censWChon 4 emissions, In accordance vnth SCAQMD Rule 403 Streets surrounding the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by fhe City to reduce PM,o emissions assodated with CP/CE C Inspections dunng A 4 vehide tradcmg of sotl off-site construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such CP/BO C Inspections dunng q q episodes consWctlon Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all machve censWChon areasthat remain inactlve for 95 CP C Inspections dudng A 4 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions consWctlon The censWchon contractor shall select the equipment based on low emission factors and high-energy effiaency; and ensure tl~at all CP C Dunng Grading Plan C q construction equpment vnll be tuned and maintained in accordance rewew with the manufacturer's speafiphons The construction contractor shall utilize electric or dean altematlve fuel powered equipment where feasible CP C Dunng Grading plan C 4 The construction contractor shall ensure that construction gradin review g plans indude a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use CP C Dunng Grading plan C 4 Contractor shall use low volatile organic compound (VOC) coatings review and asphalt SWCtuml painting shall be spread out over a pedod of CP C Inspections dunng C 4 50 days or more censWCtlon .. ~-t ~ ~'fh ~kyf i ` '~4'y F i k ` ~ t h, t ~Y µ .i. 14 \ n 4it~ l u~~.~~ 1 Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Milliken Avenue with the CE B Dunng review of C Protect Entry 1/3 improvement plans Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency ! Method of Verifleation" t"J- . ~ " - ~ ; -~ - ; ~,' Sanctions - ' CDD -Community Development Duector A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection • 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWChon B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - Qty Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWchon C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold CeNficete of Occupancy BO • Bulding OtfiGal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Fue Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP ~ • i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001 SUBJECT: TRACT 16217 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICANT: LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF WEST GREENWAY CORRIDOR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements ComoleGOn Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _/_/_ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or rn the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all _/_/_ Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irngation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Condibonal Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which _/_/_ include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Terra Vista Community Plan 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business achwty being commenced thereon, all _/_/_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner SC-04-01 1 C' D 1'1 Pro)ect No DRC2001-00407 Comolehon Date 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Bwlding and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, vrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bulding, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wilh all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site I~ghting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of budding permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view 9 Trash receptacle(s) are requred and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 10 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 11 All budding numbers and indmdual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, including proper illumination 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of budding permits 13 For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code 14 For multiple family development, a minimum of 125 cubic feet of exterior lockable storage space shall be provided 15 For residential development, recreation arealfaality shall be provided as required by the Development Code 16 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products SC-04-01 2 n' Q -/_! I I / / / / / / / / / I / / I / / / / / / / / / / / Protect No DRC2001-00407 :. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Ali parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adfacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk 6 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commeraal, office, industrial, and multi-family residential protects or more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is great After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whale number ~. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the protect 5 % - 48-inch box or larger 5 % - 36-inch box or larger, 20 % - 24- inch box or larger, and 70 %° - 15-gallon 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adfacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope • shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy Comolehon Date -/-/- / I _/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -//- -/-/- -/-/- -/- - -/-/- - -/- -/-/- SC-04-01 3 G p ~C~ Project No DRC2001-00407 Comolehon Date F G. H. 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible _/_/ for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be _/_I included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to Ctty Planner review and _ approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Division 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on _/_/_ the perimeter of this pro/ect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, _I_I_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the prinaples of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Signs 1 Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes _/_/_ prior to occupancy and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of budding permits Environmental • 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719 00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the _/_/_ issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bulding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and _/_/_ location of mail boxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits • SC-04-01 4 CI v ~`~ Protect No DRC2001-00407 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, ~OR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS I. General Requirements 1 Submit four complete sets of plans including the following / / a Site/Plat Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils _/_/_ report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation _/_/_ coverage to the City prior to permit issuance J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the pro/ect file number (i e , CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Budding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mator addition to _/_/_ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Dtwsion pnor to permd issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tracUparcel map recordation _/_/_ and prior to issuance of bulding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays SC-04-01 5 CI ~ ~~ Protect N o DRC2001-00407 Comolehon Date 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public / / counter) _ _ 6 Submit pool plans to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services / / Department for approval _ -- K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Bwlding Code for the property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness _ _ _ 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Bwlding Code for required occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ 4 Provtde draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, to accordance with UBC / / Table 5-A _ _ 5 Provtde draft stops in attics in line with common walls / / 6 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating to accordance with UBC _/_/_ Table 5 -A 7 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A / / 8 If the area of habitable space above the first floor exceeds 3,000 square feet, then the _/ / constructton type shall be V-1 Hour _ _ 9 Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same budding shall be not less than 1-hour _/_/ fire-resistive construction ~ L. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Budding Code, Ctty / / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in _ _ _ substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / / pertorin such work _ _ _ 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at / / the time of application for grading plan check _ _ _ 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building _/ / permds _ _ 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new constructton protects and for / / existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more _ _ _ of combrned cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civd Engineer SC-04-01 6 CI ~ ~~ Prgect No DRC2001-00407 Comolehon Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs fot all new street Itghts for the first stx months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior tc budding permd issuance rf no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Community Facilities Districts This protect is subtect to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Distract Prior to recordation of the map, the protect shall be annexed into the appropriate CFD Contact the Fire District Administrative Office to initiate the annexation process O. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Ftre District and the Water District . 2 Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Ftre District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Dtstnct standards 3 Ftre flow requirements for this protect shall be 2_` gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Dtstnct personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 5 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Ftre Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer to the presence of the Water Dtstnct or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size • 8 Prior to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground SC-04-01 7 ~ D ~.1 ~, -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- P Q. R. Protect N o DRC2001-00407 Comoletion Date 9 Regwred Note If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the _/ / issuance of the building permit _ a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submitted to the Fire Distract for acceptance 10 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue / / reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in _ _ _ accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Re/Iective Hydrant Markers " On pnvate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate _/_/_ fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avai/ability for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flaw Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, requres an approved automatic / /~ fire sprinkler system _ _ 2 The fire sprinkler system requires Fire District approval, and a permit NO WORK is _/_/ permitted without a permit issued by Fire Construction Services _ 3 All commeraal structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with / / an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all _ _ _ structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (FP5), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 4 Required Note Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map / ! stating that all commeraal structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E _ _ _ Occupances with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Secticn "E" -Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire District 5 Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested / / and accepted by the Fire District _ _ _ 6 The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational _/_/_ immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupances, or 100 or more sprinklers to ali other Occupancies Fire Access 1 Residential Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain / / • approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes All roadways _ _ _ or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 5~-04-0, c~ ~ ~~. Protect No DRC2001-00407 Completion Date 2 Residential & Commercial Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submi and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line AI proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceed 150 feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shal contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps. humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or access roadway: without pror written approval of the Fire Distract, Fire Safety Division 3 All portons of the facility or any porton of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located wtthm 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior building openings 4 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bulding plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specrfic details and ordering information 5 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire District's approval of the wnstruction of any gate across required Fire Distract access roadways/driveways 6 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 7 A bulding directory shall be regwred, as noted below a Lighted directory within 20 feet of main entrance(s) to the site 8 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire Distract Standards 9 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on regwred Fire District access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 10 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identity who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fire lanes 11 New buildings other than dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 12 In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, swtes, or buldings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga SC-04-01 9 c ~ Q -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- / / -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- / I -/-/- Protect No DRC2001-00407 Completion Date S. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Reqwred Note Prtor to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the / / budder shall submit a letter to the Ftre District on company letterhead stating that water for fire _ _ _ fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access road shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site T. Architectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site devefopment/use permit, or the issuance of a butldtng permit, _/_/ whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the revew and approval of the Ftre District Call the Ftre Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fve Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal U. Fire Alarm System 1 An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is regwred by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on / / use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard _ _ _ 2 Pnor to issuance of a building permit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submttted to the / / Fire District for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire District permit _ _ _ 3 Pnor to any remodel, modification, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire Dtstnct approval and / / a permit are regwred Plans and specifications shall be submttted to the Fire Distnct _ _ 4 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall _/ / be tested and accepted by the Fire District _ V. Fees 1 Ftre Dtstnct fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho / / Cucamonga Fire Dtstnct as follows '* _ _ _ a $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply b 677 (per new building) for Multi-family Residential Development *'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans W. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be regwred, dependent upon intended use a Other To install anv access control device. system or anv material under upon or / / within the regwred fire district access roadway This includes any sate, barrier, trafftc- _ _ _ calming device speed blJR1D, speed hump. or any device that delays or slows Ftre District response X. Plan Submittal Required Notice 1 Plans shall be submttted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 / / Building, Fire, Mechanicel, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 _ _ _ and FD32, Guidelines and Standards SC-04-01 t0 !1 1 Q t - \ Prgect No DRC2001-00407 Completion Date NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems andlor any / / • consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans _ _ _ NOTE A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new wnstruction protects and / / for existing buldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more _ _ _ of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped and signed by a Cahfomia Registered Professional Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS Y. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power / / These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell _ _ _ 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, / / with dvect lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the _ _ _ entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be invandal-resistant fixtures / / Z. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors / / 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are / / within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be _ _ _ used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ AA. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be / / lifted from frame or track in any manner _ _ _ 2 Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or _/ / prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire _ _ BB. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for / / - nighttime wsibihty -- 2 At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of _/_/ protect shall be erected wdh vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so _ indicated Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division 3 All developments shall submit a 8 %d' x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi- _/ / tenant developments to the Police Department _ _ • sc-oa-01 „ CID ~ ,~ I-~m ~/b November 20, 2001 To the Officials of the various departments and members of the City Counsel of Rancho Cucamonga, California RE the future of our community, and THE ENVIORIvfENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (Development Review DRC 2001-00407) On behalf of many of the homeowners in the Seville Development, we would like to address many issues with regard to our community, which we feel are affecting our hying conditions, property values, and reputation of the city When we purchased our homes 3-4 years ago, we were told that `"Terra Vista" was an upscale district of Rancho Cucamonga, and for that reason we would be paying an annual assessment m addition to our properly taxes Thrs money would go toward the maintenance and the further beautification of our neighborhood. We willingly accepted paying this additional fee, however, we are not satisfied with the way our azea is being maintained For example, it took years for the sheet sweeper to sernce our streets and they have come on a regular basis only in the last stir months The following issues are still unresolved Enforcing existing ordinances and codes 1 Speed limits on our streets (resulting m excessive numbers of auto accidents) 2 Rubbish and trash receptacles m plain view from the street 3 Litter on Milliken Ave 4 Graffiti (told at the "Night Out Against Crime" to call and it would be removed in 24 hours It took two phone calls and two weeks ) 5 Posted signs in our parks (i a motorized vehicles and park curfew) See attached photos 6 Sigiis not wnsistent (three say no motorized vehicles and one says no motorized vehicles on turf azea) 7 Solicitors ignoring "No Soliciting" and "No Trespassing" signs (Told by Dawn in city license dept to bring m flyers and rt would be dealt with ) Perk We also unhappy with the excessive noise created by ambulances pazkmg m Milliken In addition to the unresolved issues mentioned above, we are concerned with the effect a lazger population would have in our immediate area We tax payers support the city We do not feel we should have to support more temporary residents than we already do, who enjoy the use of our parks Arid schools at our expense Also, the opening of highway 210 will create more traffic to our already busy streets Rancho Cucamonga had a reputation of being an "apartment community" four yeazs ago The lack of respect towazds our residents and the destmchon of our property aze the result of people who don't reside here, or do not have a vested interest in our city We appreciate the.tune you have allowed us today We hope the issues we have raised will be resolved soon, so we can enjoy this place we have come to call our home Respectfully, Carol Greenberg Shelley Am o hazon Marc ~, j e.-n C- !.~ T H E A N C U O O f U C A M O N C A Staff Report DATE November 28, 2001 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL DRC2001-00519 - TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS -The dnve-thru fast food restaurant consisting of 2,715 square feet on the Neighborhood Commeraal distnct, located at 7369 APN 227-182-10 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North - Vacant, Medium and Low-Medium Residential South - Currently under construction, Low-Medwm Residential East - Currently in process, Medium-High Residential West - Office Professional Distnct B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Neighborhood Commeraal North - Medium Residential Distnct South - Low-Medwm Residential East - Medwm-High Residential West - Office Professional Distnct USE PERMIT development of a 69 acre of land in Milliken Avenue - C Site Charactenstics The protect is located within the existing Central Park Plaza, a neighborhood shopping center constructed by Lewis Retail in 1994 The existing stores in the center include Ralph's Grocery, Ace Hardware, Body Shots, Carl's Jr , Tarbell Realtors, and Pomona First Federal The proposed site is the last undeveloped pad within Central Park Plaza The pad currently contains grass and is surrounded by parking stalls and landscape planters, which will not be removed with the proposed construction Curb, gutter, sidewalk, ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00519 - TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS November 28, 2001 Page 2 and landscaping exist along Base Line Road street frontage Vehicular access to the site exists along Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road, as well as Mtlliken Avenue and Elena West The protect site is approximately 5 feet below street level The site slopes north to south at approximately 2 to 5 percent D Parkino Calculations Number of Number of Type of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Use Footage Ratio Required Provided KFC 2,608` 1/75 35 35" `Net floor area only, Gross square footage totals 2,715 "Reciprocal access agreement exists for all tenants in Central Park Plaza ANALYSIS A General The building design incorporates the basic architectural features that are established within the Central Park Plaza, such as towers with tde roofs, wainscot, stucco finish, and arched cornices with concrete columns The dnve-thru consists of two lanes which will wrap around the north and east sides of the bulding A formal entryway was added to the south entry, which will include decorative paving and planters on either side of the walkway Access to the site wdl be available from three existing dnveway approaches, one on Base Line Road, one on Elena West, and one on Milliken Avenue The protect meets the intent of the Dnve-thru Design policy, in that it is a minimum of 2,500 square feet, that the dnve-thru lane is located 45 feet from any street frontage B Desion Review Committee The protect was considered by the Design Review Committee (McNeel, Mannenno, Fong) on October 16, 2001, which requested that the protect be revised and brought back forfurther review At that time, the building design featured decorative tnm, signage, and accents that did not meet the intent of the center The project was revised to incorporate architectural features of the bwidings within the Central Park Plaza The revised design was considered by the Design Review Committee (Stewart, McNeil, Fong) on November 6, 2001, and the Committee recommended approval with conditions (Exhibit "D") C Technical Review Committee The Grading and Technical Review Committees have reviewed the protect and recommended approval subject to the Conditions of Approval outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval D Environmental Assessment The Environmental Irntial Study Part I was completed by the applicant and Part II was prepared by staff The project will not result in a substantial impact to the environment If the Planning Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site EZ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00519 - TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS November 28, 2001 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00519 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB EWUna Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Resolution - Location Map -Site Plan - Elevations/ Floor Plan - Design Review Committee Action Agendas dated October 16, and November 6, 2001 - Initial Study Parts I and II of Approval with Conditions for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00519 ~3 l.~J • ~Xh i bid ~~ /~~~ E~1 'CC's x s U BASELINE RD. ~ `~ ~~ O 4t1; b 1!6 19~ MTO~) ~ O OI A' ry a 9~:e nummuo g v ~ ~ 5 V ~ =g'.r Ip ~ M u ur~n~u'vr ! ff'S5p rf 1, Ill I(1 ~ M i ~.n a .n auogwal3 u'ppn6 [ ~ fde ~I^ KI xll ~ 3 r m ~ E~ sa a m vuwd ;rop Ivua9'pua~ f r ° I I t ~I9Y Y ' IF n ~ ~ a ~ d i _a iK g ~; c ~ ~ 3e ~ aE' oc 7 a ~Y a 'i ~A y ; p5 - a Cp ~? . ¢.°e 9s : e 7 tltl3- 3g 9 e ~ .-a Po '..° e -a e d d ~ e p rl a F e.; fie g ° eip~ [-B& . . i v 2 - ! ~ eeB e e tee B °6 [ ~°e I-B ar C n n nC7n n O O n Nl 9; ~h Y I ae ~` ~'~ a~ W 7 ;~~~~" ~~~~--~ Eli ~~9 q ~"~ F >WQ W ¢- O- 2e /, u `.J ys;_ 9~3. ®~ ~ M°v' m-:i anus nriow»ovn ssa som w. au amw tt I G o °'~ i ,o n PE~:~GI ' Q~ ~ ~ P D~ ~ e°fi4 ~ % ~ a'a~ l ~ ~~s. ~ m nuwd orn ~ouoP a~ s I e U ~` . Yi Y~ I , ' ;9 ~ r } T ~ ~ t c se ~~ ¢ i~Q~ i . EeY ?a e: q is w 8 •t i6p g~ 3v 3~¢~ _~5@3~'s• iE eE a-p s 9P d S5 9i 1.3E'A p~~~~ $6 $ s A' 6 - -- y Y C 6 S p e s ~El 4y :e 4°ps'se°~e C~e 3~e ekE ~e 6~ 6: 6a 6e 43 :A ~8 ~t'~el EaA e3g ~9 .tl ~ o . ~ ~ ~~a~a~~a ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ 8 i- p ` ~ ~ C~ be A¢e g a~ Y ~ ~ P F . • Mq 48 ~ X ee ccc999~~~ ~ ~Y 5 e _ - e ° =h ~ 9. ~ o e m Q _ -~( ~~ ~ ~ E I I E ~1 J Z -~ F a w, y< 3~ ~ e - ~ 4 J ~3 Q _ H ii - . .I V~, e~ 6 ~ r Z O W ~ Y WI ~h y_ - ~" ~. ~: cT-~-#~__T=~f~~ Ills=~2=~==CC-ate n n ~~~ II II II II ~ IF ~f FI= IF ~ II II II II III _ IL ~( JI_ IL ~y -~~~I_F III II II II II III =11=~k~L-11=~ II it II it III II II II II ~ =IF~f~FIF~ II II II II _IL~JI_IL - Ir if -ll- (r u u u n- 1-~~~b I u II a 11 I u u II II 1= IF ~f ~I~ dullull II_ IL ~l JII~ II-~~11 j II II II II I I ~I_11=~~Ly II II II II LI II II II II ll =1F ~ ~I =1F iF 1= u u u u u I I I I I I ~. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.00 p m. Emily Wimer October 16, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00519-TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS -The development of a drive-thru fast food restaurant consisting of 2,715 square feet on 69 acres of land in the Neighborhood Commeraal District, located at 7369 Milliken Avenue - APN: 227-182-10. Design Parameters: This site has frontages on Base Line Road and Ellena West. The site is improved with curb and gutters, and fully landscaped because it is within an existing neighborhood commercial center, Central Park Plaza The site slopes approximately 2 percent to the south. Stores located in this center are Ralph's Grocery, Ace Hardware, Body Shots, Carl's Jr , Tarbell Realtors, and Pomona First Federal To the north and east is vacant land, proposed for home development, to the south is single-family homes under construction, and to the west is an office park center. Staff Comments• The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues Kell be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect. 1 The proposed budding design is not consistent with the architectural theme established for Central Park Plaza in areas of tower location and design, wainscot tiles and their pattem, windows, awnings, building materials, etc. The following identified issues need to be resolved a Provide articulation to the budding entry by creating a formal entry statement. Place the tower at the main building entry at the south side instead of the southwest side of the budding. The details of the tower design shall match the center. b Proposed building walls consist of sandblasted materials and scored concrete block, which are inconsistent with the center. The budding material shall be stucco to match existing center Add a tower over the pick up window Secondary Issues Once all of the mator issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1 Red trim stripe and tde work on upper half of the building is not consistent with Central Park Plaza Replace with similar materials consistent with the center. 2. Red accent band around the budding shall be eliminated because it is calculated as part of the signage 3 Illuminated awnings are not allowed. 4 The wainscot tiles and pattem shall match the center Windows should not encroach into the wainscot design. Continue the wainscot at the east elevation. 5. The size of the lumber for the trellis shall be sizable and match the center. ~,ch- bid- '~D~~ F ~ DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00519 - TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS October 16, 2001 Page 2 6. All features such as decorative cement walkway, light standards, etc ,shall match the details established in Central Park Plaza 7 Replace two parking spaces in front of the main entry with hardscape and landscape to create an entry plaza area. Provide sidewalk connection from public sidewalk on Base Line Road to building The sidewalk connection between existing landscape and parking from the west through the dnve aisle to the proposed bulding should not be angled. The connection should have textured pavement. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion:. 1 All roof- and ground-mounted transformer equpment shall be screened within an endosure or located within the existing architecture The equipment screening should also be incorporated Huth similar colors and materials 2. Although proposed signage is conceptual only, approved colors are red with a maximum of two colors not to exceed 10 percent of the total letter area. Signs and sign criteria is subject to approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Landlord. 3. The dnve-thru stacking area shall be screened with a combination~of decorative low walls, beaming and lush landscaping Prowde a street scene with screening materials from Ellena West similar to the Base Line Road street scene. 4. All wall-mounted utilities shall be in an area and designed to be enclosed, archdectural integrated as part of the budding design. 5 Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of the building. A minimum of 3 trees should be added on the south side of the bwlding Indude the calculations in the Conceptual Landscape Plan. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends that the protect be revised in light of the above comments and brought back for further rewew. Design Review Committee Action Members Present• Larry McNiel, John Mannenno, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Emily Wimer The Committee recommended the protect come back for Consent Calendar with the following rewsions• Major Issues. Provde articulation to the building entry by creating a formal entry statement. Place the tower at the main budding entry at the south side instead of the southwest side of the building. The details of the tower design shall match the center. 2 Extend trellis over the pick-up window. E1O DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00519-TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS October 16, 2001 Page 3 Secondary Issues 1 Red thin stnpe and the work on upper half of the bwldmg is not consistent with General Park Plaza Replace with similar matenals consistent with the center 2 Red accent band around the building shall be eliminated because it is calculated as part of the signage. 3 Extend wainscot tiles on all four sides of the building Windows should not encroach into the wainscot design Continue the wainscot at the east elevation 4 Move the handicap parking and landscape area to be in front of the main building entry. The pavement of the handicap space shall be of the same concrete matenal as the walkway around the building Policy Issues: 1. Illuminated awnings are not allowed 2. The size of the lumber for the trellis shall be sizable and match the center. 3 All features such as decorative cement walkway, light standards, etc., shall match the details established in Central Park Plaza. 4 All roof- and ground-mounted transformer equipment shall be screened within an enGosure or located within the existing architecture The equipment screening should also be incorporated with similar colors and matenals 5 Although proposed signage is conceptual only, approved colors are red with a maximum of two colors not to exceed 10 percent of the total letter area Signs and sign cntena is subject to approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Landlord. 6 All wall-mounted utilities shall be in an area and designed to be enclosed, architectural integrated as part of the bwldmg design 7. Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of the building A minimum of 3 trees should be added on the south side of the building. Include the calculations in the Conceptual Landscape Plan. 8. The dnve-thru stacking area shall be screened with berthing and lush landscaping • L~~ CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 5 30 p m Emily Wimer November 6, 2001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00519-TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS -The development of a dnve-thru fast food restaurant consisting of 2,715 square feet on 69 acres of land m the Neighborhood Commercial Distnct, located at 7369 Milliken Avenue - APN 227-182-10 Design Review Committee Action Members Present John Mannenno, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Emily Wimer The Committee recommended approval of the protect proposed revisions which included modifications to the elevations, a formal entry statement extending the trellis over the pick-up, and removal of the red accents on three of the four elevations The Committee directed the applicant to work closely with staff to adhere to Central Park Plaza sign cntena n -._J C12 Cny of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Omsgn Isoal nn•ztso ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) The purpose of this~fomi~ project so'tFi'at tFie`City ~m< '. ~ 4} r.- guidelines;'tFie Califomia'l: ,,~~, to Implement CECtA'...Jt.is. ry ^. RED': provided"infull~ ~~:h=for,;,, /.v , CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA AUG 2 i ZUU1 RECENED -PLANNING ~,~_ •• _- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that d is the msponslbllity o/the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submdtal, Cdy stall will not be evadable to peAorm wolk requned to pmwde missing mlormabon Appl~cat~on Number/or the pro/ect to which this form peRams DRC 2001-00237 Pro/act Kentucky EYied Chicken/ Pizza Hut Express Title Name & Address of protect Kentucky FYied Chicken/ Pizza Hut Express owner(s) 17901 Von Kerman Irvine, CA 92614 NameBAddrnsso/developerorpro/act Isis Retail Center (Central Park Plaza Developer) sponsor 1156 N. Mountain Ave., Upland, CA 91785 Tricon Global Restaurants, Inc. 17901 Von Kerman, Irvine, CA 92614 Contact Person 8 James Forget/ Address RNf• Design Group ,nF~ c Beach Blv~ I~ La Habra, CA 90631 h / E13 ~~ ..i•~i. i/+/r~.~n~\r/,(1./C1C/111~ITC[l\I~IITCTI'\11Ii 119 X17/nn I'Y..-~ Name 8 Address of person preparing this form (d different /rom above) Doroteo O. Federis III. DeS1CJn lJ1 VUQ 1201 S. Beach Blvd. La Habra CA 90631 Telephone Number. 562-902-amz ~.~ ~R~ Information indicated by asterisk (') rs not n=qurred of nonconslrucbon CUP-s unless otherwise requesfed by staff '1) Pmwde a lull scale (8-1/2 x 11) rnpy o/ the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of crolor photographs which show representative views into the site /rom the noRh, south, east and west, wews into and from the site /rom the primary access pants which serve the sde, and representative wews of significant /eatums hom the sde lndude a map showing location o/ each photograph. 3) Protect Location (describe): The Project is located on the South West Corner of Baseline Rd. and Ellena West, in the Central Park Plaza Develounent of Lewis Retail Centers. The protect wi17 )~ t~t~ at the h*-~rrh F~ ~ Corner of the lot. 4) Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (attach addd~ona/ sheet d necessary) APN; 022718210 •5)GrossSdeArea(adsgfl) 29,970 square feet (.68 acre) ~6) Net Sde Area (total sde size minus area of public streets 8 proposed ded~cabons). 29.970 (.68 acre0l 7)Descnbe any proposed general p/an amendment or zone change which would affect the pro/ed site (attach add~bonal sheet i/necessary NO ChanaPc r 1 L..J Eby I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTERIINITSTDI WPD 3/00 Paae 2 8)lnclude a description of all permits which Nell be necessary /rpm fhe Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agenaes rn order fo fully implement the pro/ect Building Permit, Grading Permit, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical Permit` . _ Fire Department, and Department of Environmental Health. 9)Descnbe the physical setting of the sde as d exists belore the pm/ect mcludmg information on topography, sod stabdrty, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing stuctures on site (mGudmg ege and condrt~on) and the use of the structures Attach photographs of significant /eatures described In addition, site all sources ofrnlomrabon (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, haKic studies)• The current site is a part of an existing master planned development designed and cronstructed by Lewis Retail Center in 1994. The topography of the site is relatively flat, but slopes minimally in the southerly direction. Baseline Road, y~ich is north of the site, is elevated approximately 6'-0" to 6'-6" about the proposed site pad elevation of 1325.4'. Ellena West, which is east of the site, is also above the pad elevation but gradually slopes down to be able to provide access to the development. No existing structure, trees, or road exist at the site's pad. There are existing sidewalk, paved parking, and street scape adiacent to the site. 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects o/the sde Sde all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history) The site is situated inside the existing Central Park Plaza Shopping Center. The project is on designated pad, which has been certified for development. the existing stores at the shopping center are: Ralphs Grocery, A~ Hardware, Body Shots, Carl's Jr., Tarbell Realtors, Pccnona's First Federal. E1S 11)Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now af/ect the site (ain:ratt, roadway noise, etc) and how they will allect proposed uses 12)Descnbe the proposed pro/ect m detaA This should provide an adequate descnpdon o/the site m lama o/uPomate use which wdl result born the proposed protect. Indicate rl there are proposed phases lordevelopment, the extent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anbapeted completion of each incroment. Attach additional sheet(s) d necessary ~_yproject will be on the narthwest corner of the existing Lewis Retail Center development, "Central Park Plaza". The project consists of a new Kentucky FYied Chicken/Pizza Hut Express restaurant building. The building will consist of two tower elements that enhances the building. The towers are located on opposite corners. One of the towers faces the shopping center ca~lex, close to the restaurant entrances. The other tower is located on the nartheast side of the building. There is also two trellis elements added to the building. One is at the drive-thru area and the other is at the landscape area on the east side of the building. A parking area will be provided at the south side of the building that is part of the new cans rn ;on, hgt h re are also exist?~q_parkina that is part of the existing development. A drive-thru is on the north side of the building, nom,-~no~ +., n;~o1;nP Rnad_ Tha ~m~arr doec not have a nhace develovm_nt. 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, mcludmg rnlormabon on plants and animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type o/land use (residential, commeraal, etc), intensity o/land use (one-lamely, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc J and scale of development (height, lrontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The surrounding properties adiacent to the site are: To the North: Across Baseline is a vacant land with score vegetation. To the North East: A residential development. To the East: Across Ellena West is a vacant land. 14)Will the pmposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of fhe sunoundmg general area o/ the pro/ect~ The proposed project will not change the scale ar character of the surrounding general area of t1?e proiect. ~,~ 15)lndicate the type o(shor!-tens and long-temr Horse to be generated, ~ncludmg source and amount How will these nose levels affect adjacent propeRies and on-site uses What methods of sound proofing an; proposed No short-term or long-term noise will be generated. '16J lndreate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees A7o trees to be removed ar replaced. 17J Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water suppl~esJ into which the site drams The site has been designed for the domestic water supply to drain ultimately into the 12" sewer line on the south side of Baseline Road. 18Jlnd~cate expected amount oI waterusage (See Attachment A Jorusage estimates) For/uRherGanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County WaterDrstnct at 987-2591 a Resrdent~al (gaUdayJ Peak use (gaUDay) b CommercraUlnd (gauday/acJ AProx. 1, 935 gal/dageak use (gaUmrNac) 19)lndicate proposed method olsewage disposal Septic Tank X Sewer lJsepbc tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests /1 discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed rnd~cate expected dar/y sewage generation- (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For /urther danficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County WaterDrstnct at 987- 2591 a Resrdent~al (gal/dayJ b CommerciaPpro7tBnaatel~ 1,513 Gallons/day RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20J Number o/ residential units Detached (indicate range of parcel saes, minimum lot srze and maximum lot srze Not Applicable E~~ Attached (md~cete whether units are rental or /or sale units) 21JAnhcrpated range of sale prates and/orrents Not Applicable Sale Pnce(sJ $ to $ Rent (permonthJ $ to $ 22) Specdy number o/bedrooms by unit type Not Applicable 23J /nd~cate antiapated household srze by unit NOt Applicable b'Pe 24Jlndicate the expected number o/school children who wdl be residing within the prolecf Contact the appropnate School Distracts as shown in Attachment B. a Elementary b Junior High c Senior High ' COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS Not Applicable 25J Descnbe type o/use(s) and malorlunchon(sJ o/commeroial, mdustnal orrnstrtuhonal uses Take out or dine in food service 26J Total floor area o/commercial, mdustnal, or institutional uses by type 2792 square feet. E12~ 27J lndicate hours of operation 10:00 AM to 10:00 PM 28) Number of Total employees Alaximtun 6 emolovees pez' shift. Maximum ShrR 8 hours. Time of Maximum ShrR peak hours -varies per restaurant. 29JPmwde breakdown of anbc~patedlob classificabons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an ind~cat~on olfhe rate o/hue for each classification (attach addd~onal sheet d necessary) er Crew Chief and staff wa es and sal din employee's experiences and amount of sales at store). 30) Estimation o/the number of workers to be hued that currently inside in the qty +/- 808 of working staff or crew. • '31 JFor commercial and industnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract, et (81 BJ 572~283J Not Applicable ALL PROJECTS 32J Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the pm/ect been contacted to determine their abrl~ty to pmwde adequate service to the proposed pmlect7 l1 so, please indicate their response All agencies have been contacted. Service request is being processed. \~ .,~ .uu~.~n~cu~.i,rnnuc~nni uirr_rnunr..rr-., u,.... ~..... In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous andror toxic matenals~ 33)Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB=s, rad~oaclrve substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable Irgwds and gases Also note underground storage o/any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/use, if known A previous study by Dames and Moore concerning the historical land use is provided for reference. (See attached.) 34JWill the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary or longterm use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above9 tt yes, provide an inventory o/all such materials to be used and proposed method o/ disposal The location o/such uses, along with the storage end shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on fhe appl~cabon plans No hazardous or toxic material will be stored or used on this site. l hereby cerbly that fhe statements /umrshed above and in the attached exhibits p2sent the data and information requned for adequate evaluatron o/this proJecf to the best o/my ability, thatthe /acts, statements, and in/ormahon p2sented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that addrt~onal information may be n;quin;d to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date Signet 2~ Title• • 2d i ~rn nu.nun,~n~nl Ir/\I1,.01!`/'11 I\ITGI'lluuTf~Tl~. urr.rn n.nn 3.0 PHYSIC:~L SETTZtiG Slli~.'-fir OL ~~ °P^C ~l;~e'~ pf'•SiC~L41C11. °POICoiC_i 3*d T•CTC4e0lC~1C_l ie:i.S1=S. baSe'~ ut;Cn a re'r:e :v OI Cead:P• a'raliaC)le GllbllSheC LnIOr-+-eC:C[l. 15 7i0`•'iCef'i lII tnC (•0110 W'S.~ subsecaors. 3.1 P3Y5IOGR~.P~-Y Accordm; :o a 193'_ i.~ -n;rutz :opc~ph!c map of ~e vic'.nir/ provided jv :he L:.S; Geotoccai $Ilr7ev (LSGSi, Lne SL!blet: S:Te :S AC3te^. m :he Gg2<TL QLcC^..n°!e .'.i SCC IOX1In2LC:V 1.'~= ie=: above me=n Set '.e're!. ~1L^CL'Y1 $e:e !5 1II.le COan4e ,a e!evaCCn aC.:.SS [he 1bleC: S:TE, ;he SnrrouaCm_°°_ 3te1 b:5 3 SCL'Le:i,/ SiCDIn° ?rlaieC[ OI appTO::.II:aCe:!r lCl) iee: per La1le ILSGS. 1981). 3.3 GEOLOGY :~`~~ gYDROGEOLOGY '" ~ -, R.`re: ~"ailev m the wes:e~ Tae sublec: stte is !or_ted m ;he Mcrae _+ pa.~~ of :,.e SzL -~!cotaJ ailu,nal plain [hat tins portion of tae Fonc:na P'.am. Tje area consul of a _cu::=e:'; T ^ ,W yea •~ne:e !ar_e de're!epea adlacea[ to [te San Gabr-.e: ~fountatns. Tie site ~s lec_.e.. ~ - alluvtal •:ars zmaaaCa° _CII Day and Dee: G..°~LS CC2~SC_ Taese 311u'•:'sl .'.C^,CSiU COnSiS Ji ,~ o-.; •,e arcs & ~fccre. 1989)• irre2t!lariy to leatiatlar!v be?dea. uaconsol!da[z- __ (~ Tae s!te is located in the Chino Basra wh!ch is oz:e JI the :cur taaior sub-basis of the Lppe: Santa Ana R!ve: hydrogeoiegic area. Tae Chino Basin a bounded on [he south by the S.:nta .anti Rive:, on the acrh by :he San Gabre: ~Icunta!Js, anti en :he west b;r the Puente Fiiils. Groundwater in :he Cntao Basra or_s'mates from ce ~Jlaccn of ;ur_ace '::ace: Tung and ~!atall tenon the valle;r ;loor (Dames 3: ~Icore, 1989). Gr~ d•:~ate: de~thU:n is a R~cao a ~ ~~e.ly area va:.es be^:~e.a -C0 ie~: be:0`z ?rCUna Z1r:aC- \v°C~ anti -.0 b,_ and ..o s m direction (Cscamenga County F%a*s: Dtst*:c:. petsor~i :.crmumcacon. 19°~l. Tne Camo Balm srouzewate: as a waole tins been =c•.e:sz:.r arec:ed by a long-to:..•• Bait imbalance as wet as him levers of Total Dtssolveoa Sclr e.~~~c~eute~aoe ~"'J~e RaL ao a~:c_i:ural re:t!r.! ware: (Danes 3c Moore. 193.). Cucamonsa ara. however. is a :ce:lzat due to the ;cca cuir+ of the recharge wa[e: pe.~olanng into cod conGOl basis aloes The southern :.ont of ~e =.curt:,.:ns !C'~c:~cns_ Ccunrr T~%ate: ~+ :con) Dtsa-:c:. ce-ona! .:oriu~uatcaecn. _ ~.0 HISTORIC:~i. L.~-ti~ t5s. Dames ~: ~fcer :°',:e't e. Se:„'_:e': 1S:Ct:Cal 1eG^-~ :CC[C~^'[_~. CL"1C!n_°_ 3Cd Sale^r ~e.T~'ti. and archtval topo~ph:c :naps for his:ct-.csl ricrnaccn of lee sae and sy-ouidia; area. Taese i rete:eLCeS ~2•~ -e•~te'.L eC a~.r .'.': iC.°.nCe JC 1CI:'llCe$ 'FnICC ':JOL'ld Slloo>S~ the COCe1C31 7TLS000e ~ ~ .~• CC[CLC1l ..°CC ~ e Sae :O ~e ;LSC ~C:e'~ ny OI 11a21rdCl:S SllbS:'aCeS 3I :he S:Le and to .Y,.lt.ate _ ~ 2\ OIIS;Le SCnL:eS OI C°LT.?min'-C•-On. ~Ltempa were 3150 ;aide CO VCC'%V h15 iv'GC71 SaabCCn VI3D5. ,, ,; 5~-anar•r °I i.~'e S;LC VLC:aICr~s b1S:°['C.^.l how•eve: • n0 maDS iCC ta15 are! coula be !orate... land use 3s tnLe2rered crem these 5curces is pre<_eated oe!ow. e~, the sub)e=: site as we:l as the adiaceat prope:aes were unde•,e!ezed. ine atc:uson In ls, Tope. cad Santa Fe Z~ii:oad lansversed in 3n east-west d'uet:icn approxu'nate!y two miles Lo the scuta of the su::;ec: prope.-ry (L:SGS CaLicr..m C:.LCSionsa ~t:acraasie 1S Minute Topo~Di•=c VSaD. 18CC). a wilt °T :_e r.,ilread w~ ~_^. °13ce G'dVC!m°_ nCtih-50L'L~1 where what s acw ~tiiti'sea By 1°-' , ~ . „~,as!e ; ~ ~ ~^ute Tcpo~phic Vfap. 19~~). In pre•neus iaternexs ~veaue (i:SGS Ci.a_~ Qt- er ~;oe barresrs to lecai wtm area resideau. ;t was lesred that ;his spur "^'~ used :o traasp wmer_es (Dames cad ~Icor:. 1983)• ~ 19-= aerial photog-aph scows mat Base!iae .lead was already in place by --.~ ame, however. Lhe subjet: prope^r ~ sail unde•re!ezed. Dame~^ ,yLjOand l•Irs Seoas:taa ~tinebe~~o~ Suers of a she n r.~ca dtre~l.rva°rh oi,ihe orope.~, w tired ~ vtae,rar3 cot fecal wiae-es be^~eea sublet: ste. stated •--t the ;ttolec: propew as ~ v eamres. ?.: the a,;.e 19;1 and 19 ~ 9. Dt::--:.°- this rmz ~e prope: _y w• =s °wne.. by 10,000 these rote^riew•s were _caducrec. a 10,000 V'earsres re?reseataeve c!ai~ed mat Lhe prope^r was leased to shee?herders du-.ns rh,= ?erred and ao ~=rdous mare: a!s were Led en the prope._. (Dames & ~f°ore, 1989). Tis is coasiseai wtth 'tee 19.1 ae^ai photo which w;~ obsesred show•ins ao deve!cpmeat ei the ?rope.:y at this ame• he mope-:: was ?urcaased ter dere!epment and was le:. unused cot anpro:.imateiy 10 In 19 ; 9 - o ° ~ 1986 ae: al pncto show's nncende:: •, e=e:anoa ca :he subiet: vents (Dames & ~icere. 1,8.). prone:tr. Dames 3 ylcore ?e~otmed a Phase II invesugacen cn lie suole-: site in 1990. i'IIe ?urpose ac_ soft fer possi°ie ?es:.c:de cony-Tni.+anon in °c this mvesagaaen was :O 355255 :he near sur_' _ ~ was ceund tonne=^en :v:th Lceacr=ed ?re•;:ets s~.csiiur-ri usage. do e•ndeacz °i pesrc:Ce u..e during 3naly~cal Leung oc seven soft samples (Dames 3r Vfoore. 195G). Btriiaiag ? emits were ssied ter ••`.e property s•~'-ia~ m 1991 as :he d°-•re'.cpment of :he air-~ac shepomg teme= be'sa (City oc c't_-*.cho Cucamcnsa Euiidmg Sace:y De?arSileat. 1990- .'.1591 ae:aal '2C°C°? iDa '.^•nI:LIlS ~!S :.L:TCI~:aC°a 35 :..^.I]'~=_C:=°a JI u.C SaCLt:m° -~'1Ler 1CCe:it~~ :O •'•~' uncle: way. *z•ne•v of Dames 3r ~Ieere :e_or~s =e•resls 'mat ttz skiers lecnied directly next .o ~aipns ^e== L' av~ K Jnal.a.~r Oi prevl°lSly CCCSDIe_ 7y 3 1r'r C!e^^' °- C3Calri as =e= Wlden .,an,-• C'z~e'_' In 199:. approxlmate:y .0 sallens of te~achioroe:hyeae (FCE) was wtiled on the L1°or• of the -i ~ ^o ~ac:uae. Tae PCE was mCCDeII aD -lT rl 7ut m 3 sealed 'ouc'.c~ tac:iirr arouac yz ~:rr ~.~-m-'= ,e ,°r~! cotnmumc:.aen. 1590 aloaa with •tie r-8s ised :o :.!e_:.:ip the spill (Dames 3c `[cert. . E22 Davies & y[eere peaonre: were sked to assess the poteat:al for contamiriatien sever..l weeks aver the spill had occurea. ? L ~.e tLme of the obse^ranon. light stauiing was evidear on the rim, the owre: of the dr! cleave=• indicated that door around the drr c'.eanirg macaue ivL• ~ ~:., due to ove:.owsem the boiler a sriiail amcunL of che:nicai ma;r ^ave encere:l *^e t"leer c.•.,.. v it was Dames waste~.vace:. Eecaue a large volt:-,.e of ware: is dtuhed through the pipe daii, > & ~foore's cptnion that the liicelihced of soil or ?:cundwaLe: ccncaminaccn arJUad he pipe was minimal. If tse PCE pic!cea up dunng the c'.eanup pfer_ss was airosee of m an authorzed fac;lirr, tt s ,,ini:ke'.-y that any adverse zav'SO o eY ~ aLr°cor dat~~fayeyC 1 9a, the San (Dames &: Moore, personal cory.~.unication, 19. )• r Beraarlno Depar~ear of Eavtronmeatal Eealta Services asse:.ed that ~e Depar"ient 'has ao further cone^.s' with regards to ins spill (.3ppenai. B). ..0 PRESEti'T COti-DTTIOtiS Dames & Moore conduced a reconnaissance of -he site and. to the extent roars •uas ac=_ssfole, v^ surrey of the site v,c•:mty of Iuly 19. 199, to observe ar.d dec•.imeat the present ' a "drive-b 4 ub$eC :OrS sue conditiers and the azture of ne:ghbormg prope.~! de•+e!cpmenr. 'ITe follow.n_ presesL a s,±mmar;r of the ccLd:cons ocserved and ;he !nfor~.acon obrrtr-ed• 5.1 ONSIT~ Plaza Shopping Coate:. Toe lot Tne subject property is cnre:.tly the site of the Cencai Para is irregularly shaped and bordered by Baseline Road to the aorh. l~liL=K=a ~veaue to e west. ~. ~: - -~_ Terra V tsta Partway to the seutz. and Elena Ries Lo Lhe ens. hporo;.:~aQP!°i-~° oar rand property is 'r1n-eatly undeveloped. This area lies along the e:stem -~_- ereads down to the southeast core: (Figure .). Ralohs Sez;e:martet u locate= in the souther pordon of theoi aoss:ole ea uonmental conc~Q area, jamtoral rooms. and sor~ge [aclines were lire=:~- o with cwo S-dve Household type cleaning prcdecs were observed in the =!eanin°= r°om alen_ X11 caemtcais appeare= :o be prperty sealed aLd stereo on s;,elves. gallon propane tanks. grease can Several oor drains were observed to the rear of the fac•:iiry whic'oa wens oo a^oed azou"-d the locates of the aoLthwesL corer of the buiiaing. `io v+s,>;.i ;,atn.n_ ~~ roc°• area of the :-ac:iiLy s lar3eiy iron to stcrz tocu. mre:=cn ei ~e sutomceve _. Becatse the tea-- ~. Vume:otu tyces Jf SlitoIIOC're nerds were opj°='re= secnon was ail that was deemed aecessarr. was ,reR; ole=o acv ao aeec_able seaiea and ;roved Jn shelves I-ne area sup:cut:ding the Jtis non ~~ ,e ?r~ee.^r see :o this sec~en ws ocserre_. ,- evideacz of c,,nr^n,na Four shCCS e:i5t alOIIg the Sv^eL`wCSt stile OI ~~phs• T~t ^-`e i.:0 eS S7G CIS:c:or13 5 cairn. . ed in the three ~'; Yails. Cost Goners. and oee vacant shop. Irspe=~oi~s v r~~ical hcuseaold type ;.leare:s '~•e:n presear Tae_e types of „leave were occupied shoos and onl, are ?eae:slly aoc ccnstdepd to be a stgniricant r.sk. ~deinonally. no indiauons ci sp s E 23 e•ndeat in anv of these fat:hues Tae vacant s: op was cot irLpecred because access was obse-.axons lade from ouu:Ze the window ;eveale^_ a:at the swop was wever h t . o e. unan„taao It is un:~ewz ¢ any as=ardou suosances were stored m the rear of tae rac:itty empty ad s (stated m the southwest cor..e: of the prope:.y. In;oaaat'.on cbtatned =am , f p ~ empe playees mdicares that his s :he :ttrire sate o : "Lt-~IC) e C . . on. ( Lewis Ecmes ~taaageinent outhwest area oT the property also contains a re^,clmg bin. '~-t T ne s Goodyear Tire Cate:. :'crmed around 'Wis `aia prccued ao v:siole stgrs of sttr:acr sta~^ing or ha.'-'--dens = oa pe insae= materials storg=• . In :ae aarhwest c ~ derwa - i J ~ 1C= m y un s Corsu~cacn of Tanner( Realtors acr. esst re_ oc e e Sect bet+PCl a c.at'llink a r building materals 'or this pro~ec: the [tine of the iaspec3on. the mareaals storage area was lecxed cad Da=.es S. 1 t the site. : nnel wear ttnabie ro cotam access. Vist31 ocser+accrs f_er= eutstce me ~~=te blcerr perso produced no enaeac_ of hazardous subss:zces is 'yis area. S Edison (SCE) e!ec~ cal cans:ct~e:s we:e :cunt throu_acut the them Caliiorsia c l . o Four ou P:'=Q-; is !ccatea just west or the roc-,cling area in the p~~.=g b er prope^;. Num e east s:ce of Raapas .n the area wtuca is :.estg*~ted fcr :~r_**~ _ d ^ . an _3_.0 is locate Number P~4 P:~.S='9 s located on ~e acrtheast see of Raipas ae.:~ to t,`.= s:~:t:.amg consti'~c•ron. Number ted in the acrhwes core: of the prcpe.~~ nea.* the c•.-*=eat l !'6 ~ . c~ is =? beard. Number P: Pre•nous conrac: with SCE tndicctrs tisat 3) Fi + . .trr g coasancaon of Tarbel Realtors ( r mul[on (ppm) of poiycaicr~ated btpceays mnc;erme:-s containing [core than 50 pars pe n :he cenr.:cnea of this i'ac•:iity began. h d w e (PCBs) in the cooling ltttd were ao longer use :ot~ers located on the grope-• contain PCBs , ` ,.rs tat any of the a Tne:eiore.:{ :s unlieely [. Although ao SaIDD125 worn 00112=:Cd or :CSu1°- -e~OTye3. '~'e ~TeS2^.c~ JI si?_*"i*:cant er --'-bie I the butlcinQs. sad.=rd asbestos s unliKeiy on the s,tbjec: sate. Due to the .ice^at:Jn5u1C~0n O w : e cons:r~caon pr.[cnces dic~te that buildings ar` to be consu~c ors:d ~=3 a is ao yam sotisL contain asbesos. Sir:tilarly. radon, w[uch s ot<ea `ound .n ce. dcc:t<teaL.tion or t,~.e :-ndirss :or -=con cad 1?owe•:e: , problem in the Raacao Cucamcnga area. of this assessment and worn set pe^rne=• asbestos tesrWg are Seyoad the scope e arra su~ouzdmg lie sate=: crone...r s !ar=e:v uace•,e:cee3. Tae prcze^; dirrca'~' :c :h= s .s lccate•! on i T i n c ;, west has be_a re=_adv de',e!eped ~%tth spar~ent bu~ldmcs_ ~ orabie ou: red twat :his building is mdir _ the arose^~ to the east of the ssc~e=- sate. ~ sin( obser,aeoas • ~ irh t:.e LT-~IC ri c n i used as an or_-ice Icr u`:e dsr^_ouron •at :niaryner.:e;a ~oca2~e acres aac v ctaenail c t • . . .. . ;acaa ex~ "non at iIltS builaln~, the ?rape^~ to ;:e es is sa of the 'anve-av" :nspe=ncr.. Dames : h t e the scuth adiaceat prcpe yes are ~.mdeveleped. ?.t t or isposal of aaaarccus s.:c>•.:=ac_s dt ~[cct` :e:sonael Dose^red ao s:g^-s of any use. starJe. on anv ai the sun-•out:ait:?_ grape yes. ~ 2y 6.0 ~GEtiCY D?.T~ RE~~W Fede^.:1 and state dove^..meats have developed l~e2slaacn w noas cs~ni ~ ~vern was~eseand tc environmental asses. ?s a resilt of thts le,.slanon, re, marerials and the s:or_g°-, handling, control and disposal of such matezials have been promul~ted. Hume:ous agencies toilet: and daseminate uucrmation for use in evaluatin; potential eavtrcnmeatal prcbiems. 'Iae iniotmaeon presented on agency lists are pencdicallv n~Aarr!t, and Dames & Moore attempted [o secure the mos re::ear lists for review. To `-eclr'e th>s infornaaon. Dames & ~icore obrai. ed a draft report from ~ stn Envtrornneatal Se^rices ys-,y). ?, copy of tl:e Vista report is provided in ?.poendic C. For thts repot. Visa re•rewed vuormarion provided by a varery of federal, sate, and local re;ulatory agencies to assess the potential for eavtronmenral impanmen: at the subject property. Vista revtewed the following aseac;~ lists o[ ~tov.n or poreanal haz=rde~ waste sites or sites under invesaganon far hazardous substances/eavtronmenral violations for the subject property '~ and for properties wtthm a one-mtle radius of the sub]e=: site. • U S. Eavtronmeatal P_otecnen ?,Qeucv List of ?ropcsed ?nd Fira1 _V"aeenal ?ror_ty Saes List (NPL), dated Januarl 199-: • U.S. Envircn~earal Prcce~*~en ~geac;~, Resoure Cor'<er:at:on and Reco~er~ ?c: (RCR~.). RCRIS List. dated July, 199; - • U S Fmv~-ro~za~ P:otecnon A~eac?. Reseur~ Cense:ti'atien and Re`'ove:r :pct (RC~.~) Cor;ecacn ~c:aca Sites Ls. dated Seprembe:, 199=: oP_ r C:.s:*.es DaT3b~e, ~.ant13.1 Wor.: P':n List. • CaliiorttaEav-ucrm:eatai?_ctec_on?.,= c'. dated Vovember 199=: • Caliiorua Lavircnmeatal p;otecaon ?.geacp, Calstres Database, ?.SPIS Last, dare.'. Tovemi;er. 199 • U.S. Envirotmmenral P-erec~on ?.genc;~, CERCLIS L.s., dated lanuar~> 1S°''-, _y • Califoctia E,,vtrenmearal P-otecrion ~genc?. C~ Ci~CI=S• dared Vovemper. 199=: • Caliiorua Eav~sonmearal ?_otec~.on ~genc;~, L:sst Iniormanen System (LliS'CIS), dared De:'~DCr, 1993. • Caluotnta Rea=onal Rate: Quaiie; Concoi Beard. Santa :~ R: vet L'nde:Tattyd Tat:.l Trc.~cng System. Oc:obe:. 1993. • Caltiotata ]:nte2rated R%;~te Tana=eme^t Board. Sol;a R%aste Iniormadon System (SETS). datea tarn. 199=. . E2r~ • San Be:..ardmo C:,unr. So!ie W~;sLe 1~tan: se:neat De~ar_,:eIIC, P-voce ar_d Ceunc+ Owned Landfils, eace•± JaIIUar~, 1993; • Califor.~iz Depa,~e:.t of Fesich Se~•:ces. Deed Res cnon P:oce:yes RePcr, e::Led July, 1993; • Caliior_'a F.av'-=cnmenrai P:otecnen ~?eIIC•~. 6orese List, dated ~iovemi;er, lcc"_': • Califer..ra Water QL:aiir~ CJCt<ol Hoard. Toxic Pt~s Cleanup FaciL~t:es, oared ~u2•s.. 1993, • Fme:zeac•~ P!a~r:.II2 aIIe ComLnuLUry Rant-.o =mow. TRIS !ist. dated ~L`?'15L 19C3; • Caliien.La Snte Rearcr2i W'ate: Qualirr Control Beard. ~bovez-ouid Stcrge Tex Darabz<e. da*.e :September. 199:: • C31LCTaCa Si.'_Ce Re?ioll2l Wale: Qnal:il CJIICCI Board. LIIae: arouIId $tCPae T'~~ Re2rs~nors Datsbase, date= January. 19SC, • ti.S. F~vrron.:.earsl P:ctecnen ~?e~cy. cme:3ency Rzrense fee,^cacer. Sysem (ER_`iS) List, dated Sepce.:.be:, 1593, ar_d. • L.S. Eaviron*,=eatal P:etz=non ~sear%. Resaur_ Cense:vacen and Recovery :?c:, Fiaz :.-aous R%asLe C-zaemror Last. Dated JL1v. 1993. Dames & tiioore also contsc-~d Lie San Be~araino Counri, Depa.~eat of EIIVironmearal fiealth Services (SBCDE::S). tue South Coast air Quai!r~ ~faIIaaemeat Dls"c:. atd Cal-tea Deparaneat of Toxic Sues•,ances Concol regardma cue status of any inres~ gadors or eIIiorcemeat aortas at :he suole=: ~rope.~+. BuiidiIIa pe:~ics on fie ter Lhe subject prcpe^% at Cir/ Hall were also :eviewe^_'. ~ ?imm~rv CI the database searcues and re='crds re•ne•^+ nndinas are ?reserten ~e:ow 6.1 ONSTTE Tne San Be:nardmo Depar~ert Ji'r.IIVtronmeIILal Eealtu Se^nces had a ,cord of the PCE ;?til '`~ which oc:.u:~d on JaIInaty _3. 199?. :1c:ardi..a Lo Deparrnert Hies. no c•.trent concerns e:.•s-. with rear +c~ to this riiJ. Otue: s~eac;% cont::as moos by Dames & llcorz pe:sotiae'., as wet as database searues ?e:'crea by Vista. reveslea no retorts of aav ass, storas°_. or diresal of hazardous su~sr: aces ~n :,`_t sso~ect props^: 6.2 OFFSITE Only one s,te was ~derer'.ec w:thrn 1:. cntie or L!Le strblec: site. Tae iniormatron obtatne3 ..cat Vista radiates :hat Lh.-e_ din"e.-err :rode ~oLCUad storlae -~n~c5 are or have oe°_II at one aa±e in:ue at E S Grape Growers Shtppers !ocsted a 1"_10. Baseline Road Thts sue :s .3t miles dirt=-~y esst of the suoir--: ?rc~e^j and :s cross-?r1di~Z~ a arcundwate: dow. Tne Califot-~a State Re_:onal wave: Qualirr Corecl Beard's linde:s-eund Storage Tan'{ Darabase cureatly utdtcates char ~.ro tack: pre•r:ous(y urea ro store leacec ~asolme are ao baser in use and have beta e:the; c'.csed or .~:..oved. ~ thLd tans used to wore diesel fuel is cur,-ently listed as ac:tve. Siicc V;sta 'cur.d ao repcrs of leaks or remedial ac::on aL the fac•:lity, it is urlitic•".~ Char [lus ste ins hac a st~.ifca:.L =_d•.e:se tmpac: on :he sublec: proee^r (.~.ppeadi'r D). 7.0 COtiCLL"SIONS Dames & bfeore has per:crSed a P`_ase I Envirct:mearal Sae assess.:,enc in seneml conformance wtrh the Scope of Se-rrc~ autner-.red by Le•~~s Deveiepment Co for Parcl Z?i- 15-13 Iecared on the southeast core: of B~eiiae Road and ~lillikea 3•reaee. access was limtted in sere:.=1 areas liLmrng Dames & ~feore's abtitrr to evaluate the poreacal fcr conraminarion in these areas. ' Based on iniornaeon obtame:: dur:n~ thts sae 3<sessmeIIL. as wet as a stte mspec::on which was limired to readily acccss;ote as=s. Da.:.es & ~Icere cerscnnel observed no evidence of eavuronmearal tmpacs due ro^scnt or e,,,•r:cus uses of he pipe^r Stmi:ariy, ac evide_c~ was round [o suggest tact the S1CleC:: preLe^! ]c5 ~eea aCV2"-•'~!V 31120:~`j JV ~Y OL=S iL.°. ~Cllt~°s. IL is Dames 3t Yfcore's Opln:on'i2L ^_O t~'S~er inres~~3C•%C 3CII(:IIS wli~1 =22'-~--`- i0 i "5 ~rOp2~i are WaI~°nLed aL [his Circe. 3.0 LItiIIT~TIOirS The conclusions pr`seared m tats re~orL are profess:cnal eptmoas bases solely upon Cae vta:al observanons of the stLe and •ric:mry aurmg a sngse vts;L, aLa our mterrc:acon of the available tusrorcal tnfermat:on and cec•.tmeats re•rewed, as dose-be= to thts repot-.. Tnep are int~-de? etclusrvely for the purose outlinea herein. and for he sate location and proieo: indicated. Tats .;,;ror s intended for the scie •ase of Lew+'s De•re:opr=tint Co.. trs ar:itated ennt:es. 1e=de:s. and their rerecave e.:.ployees. Tne use or re-use of thu dcr:menL or the ;,ncings. concluiers, or recommeadanons presented herein. by any other parr or pares is at ~e sole rsk of said cue:. 5 It should be t_=o~~-.-d shat tas ~ !dy •z as net ir:tenc~ to be a de:mtt:'re in'%esLi~sccn of conmminanen at the s.tb~ec: orepe:ty Tau a_sses~:..eat w.s litmred ro the Scope of Sarvxes dose-bed bosom asd did act incluce e.:;.lcratorr cor•.ngs. a^d soti'water sampiins and analv't:cai testtns. Tne se^nccs pe:'ormed by Dames 3t ~Iccre •ue:e coneuc:ec in a man:er ccnsis:enL'rich :aac v axe Wised w memoe:., or sae same profession ~.u-°ndv prcnc:ng of the care and s!eil ordinari. - ' in the same iocaltrr under tae same cnnainons. It :s :mzcr~ant Co recogatze :hat ='rea lie [Host comnrae~stve Scope of Strvtc_s nay [ati .o de:ec: eavtrctttneatal iiaotliaes on a partictiar sate. Therefore. Dames 3c Moore ,:anret act ss trsLtrer~ aaa ~aanor 'ceatrr mat a stte is ;.e. of EZ`~ eavsonmearal cony-r„r,acon. No expressed or unplted represearadon or warranty is included or intended in our repots except that our services Were per:orned, within the limits orescr:bed by the Scope of ~e:'+tces, wtth :he cutoaar,+ thorou;hness and competence of our proiess;on. pomions and :econ,~eadacons presented herein apply to the existing and r°. sonable foreseeable site condicons at the the of our invesngacon. Tner cannot necessarily aPP[y to site changes oi` which this once is unaware and has not had the.opporunie+ to rere~+. Changes in the conditions of the prope:r+ may oc~.tr with dine due to natural Processes or worts of man on the subject propery or on atii2ceat Prope:nes. Changes in applicable standards may aLo ocrar zs a result of legislation or the broadening of'.caowledge. Acror.:ingly, the finding of this report may be invalidated. wholly or in par:. by changes beyond our con~ol. 9.0 ~iCES - Archival Ae::al Phoccgrapas, San Ben..ariao County Flood Control Di..u c_. San Ee:~.ar'.-ino, Caliicr. ~a. Date F:;s'^.t Sc=1e 1" ?/~;i36 C=~O i'==0C0' i/1/91 C-~3? 1"=_OCO' Dames & ~;Iccre, logg, p_e~inira.v Site Assessment and Limited Site Char-rwr:zaz:cn. vortfieist Corer or Focduil Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Rancho Cucameng2. C~tiforia. Job `lumber liZiO-.^•06-133. Dames & l~tcoi" 1939, P:e'..t,.-zirar+Slre :+,ssessmeat, Southeast Come: or l~fiiliicea Aveace and BaseiiLe Road, R::acho Cucamonga. Caliiomia, Joo `lumber _~_r0 ~0.-1.3. Dames do l~feore, 1990. Phase II Investigation. Southeast Corae: of V .t 'tiea 3venee and Ba.<.eane Read, R:mcho Cucamonga, Caiii`oraia. Gan, Demen'a, California E'A, Department of Toxic Substances Control, 1991, Personal :: communication, July '_ 1. bfoore, Kathy, Cucamonga County Wate; Dts~.c:. 1991, personal cenmttnicanon. 7uiy .3. Muller. 7e ~. Dames 3t ~feore. 199-, personal commttnic:.non. Att;ss:'-. Quiroz. Yfa.-gie. Santa A:3 Regtcaal R+ste: 'lty Control Boar. 1991, pe5cral commumc:,can. July ? 1. Rancho Cur_monga City Deparseat of Building and Planntng, 19°`, file ~revtew, Juiy "~:. _ ~2~ Rancho Cucamonga Ciry Department of Fire & Safety, 199, file review, July 23. San Bernardino County Departsneat of Environmenral Health Serric_s, Elizabe~t Patmeater, personal communicadoa, July 1994. South Coal. Air Quality l~fana=°eaeat Dissia, Don Smith, Pe=S°ral c°mmunicarion, July 20. U.S. Geological Survey, 1894, California Cucamonga 1S minute quadrangle. U.S. Geological Survey, 1953, 1973, 1981, Guasti 7S minute gttadrangle. ista Environmental Infoilnation Report, 5060 Shoreham Place, San Diego, California, dated July 18, 1994. -000- E2~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00519 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2001-00237 3. Description of Protect: The development of a dnve-thru fast food restaurant consisting of 2,715 square feet on 69 acre of land m the Neighborhood Commercial distnct, located at 7369 Milliken Avenue - APN. 227-182-10 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Tncon Global Restaurants 17901 Von Kannan Irvine, CA 92614 • 5. General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercal 6. Zoning: Neighborhood Commercal 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located on the last undeveloped pad m the center. The Central Park Plaza is located at the southeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road. The pad currently contains grass and is surrounded by parking stalls, landscaped planters, and a trash enclosure, which will not be removed with the proposed construction Curb, gutter, and sidewalk exist along the street frontage. Vehicular access to the site exists via two dnveways, one along Ellena West and one access along Base Line Road The protect site is approximately 6 feet below. The site slopes north to south at approximately 2 to 5 percent North of the site are single-family homes with an application currently being processed, east is vacant land with an application currently being processed, south are multi-family homes under construction, and west is an office professional center. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Emily Wimer . (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None E 30 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, involving at least one Impact that Is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ()Land Use and Planning (x) TransporfatioNCrrculation ()Public Services ()Population and Housing () Biological Resources () Uhlrties and SBMCe Systems (x) Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources (x) Aesthetics (x) Water () HazaMs ()Cultural Resources (x) Fvr Quality (x) Noise ORecreation Mandato Findin s of Sr nificance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (x) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the protect, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed ~~-~--v` Emily Wimer Assistant Planner November 28, 2001 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Sign cant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified • P"tmUally Sipnlfi®nt I"p"d lm Issues and Supporting Information Sources s,~mtla0,,; ~ ~ 5a Win, ,~ i a i mo i a i a 1. LAND l1SE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (x) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (x) policies adopted by agencies with funsdiction over the prolect~ c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (x) vianity7 E3\ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 3 Potentauy SmYfi®nl I~aa las+ Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~ o°„ nao~ SIp~Yfimnt x" I a to tea I a I a d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (x) established commurnty~ Comments: a-d) The protect site is located within the Central Park Plaza The site is the last undeveloped pad in this center. The area is designated Neighborhood CommerGal and is located off Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue The proposed restaurant would be consistent with existing and permitted land uses within the Office Professional Distnct. Polenosuy 5~ifl~ra Idea Lese Issues and Supporting Information Sources PoI°'"el'Y 9grYflCen1 Unless WEpehan '"°" 9pifl®nl N" 1 lea I I 2. POPIAATiONAtJDHOUSING. Would the proposal• a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (x) population protections b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly () () () (x) or indirectly (e.g., through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (x) housing Comments• a-b) The construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Operation of the restaurant well include a maximum of six employees per shift The addition of these employees will not create a demand for additional housing, as they will likely reside within the City c) Approximately .68 acre is proposed for development The restaurant will be constructed on a parcel within the existing Central Park Plaza, zoned Neighborhood Commercial There are no residential structures in this complex. Polenaally Sipniflcent sryea Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~ d1~'I'' prcfl®nl ""m IbepeOm "~" SIpNfi®nt No l a m tea I I a 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result ~n or expose people to potential impacts mvo/v~ng a) Fault ruptures () () () (x) b) Seismic ground shakings () () (x) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions () () (x) ( ) d) Seiche hazards? () () () (x) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (x) E32 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 4 PWenaelly Sllpifi®nl I,ryetl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources solN ~t IAO~tlon sip ixmnt IJo I q In tea I I d f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the land h) Expansive soils i) Unique geologic or physical features U O O (x) O O O (x) O O O (x) O O O (x) Comments• a-c) No known faults pass through the site, it is not an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within 1 mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault lies approwmately 3 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing 6.0-7 0 magnitude earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to 7.5 magnitude earthquakes, is 9 miles northeast of the site, and the San Andreas, capable of up to 8 2 magnitude earthquakes, is 11 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhenng to the City grading standards and the Uniform Budding Code will insure that geologic impacts are less than significant. d) The site is not located near a body of water. e-i) The site is relatively flat so grading WIII be minimal. Grading null even out the site and create necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage There are no expansive sods or unique geologic features and no subsidence of land. Polentlely SlgWimnt irryed Lena Issues and Supporting Infonnahon Sources ~„®°,,; ,qe~~, ~,~®,,, ,,, I tea I I 4. WATER Will the proposal result to a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aqurfer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? E33 (x) ( ) O (x) O (x) O (x) O (x) O (x) ~..J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 5 ramueuy Slgrlflrant I,nr»a toss Issues and Su ortln Information Sources PP 9 Pp1nha"Y ypryfimnl u"'~ MNgatlOn '"tl" Sipnificent No I C In tM I ct I d g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (x) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? () () () (x) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater () () () (x) otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a) The absorption rate vnll be altered because of the paving and hardscape proposed All runoff will be conveyed to existing drainage fatalities, which have been designed to handle the minimal amount of flow. No other improvements beyond the master plan of the drainage are necessary to accommodate the protect. The impact is not considered sigrnficant. b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain as indicated (zone X) on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map c-e) The pro/ect site is not located near a body of water. The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how storm water runoff will be conveyed, prior to issuance of a grading permit f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area, as the site is not used for groundwater discharge Pwa,mny 511}tlfl®nt IrtpeG Lau Issues and Supporting Infortnadon Sources ~,P01~,,,`"fl,®°„ M,~"'~a, 5y, ~ ,~ I I tl I C 5. AIR Ql1AlJ7'Y. Would the proposal. a) Violate any air quality standard or contnbute to an () (x) () ( ) existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () () () (x) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (x) cause any change in Gimate~ d) Create objectionable odors? () () () (x) Comments: a-b) The proposed pro/ect was screened using Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Distnct, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distnct, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects The criteria pollutants screened for included: reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were E 3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 6 calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6th edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model In order to reflect the commeraal nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of light passenger vehicles and decrease medium and heavy- duty diesel trucks The proposed project operational emissions well not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is innon-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the protect contnbution to regional emission of cntena pollutants Dunng operation, exhaust emissions from trucks and employees traveling to the site will increase CO levels in the area As shown in Table 2, operation activities at the sites will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6th edition values, the URBEMIS7G model estimates vehicle tnps associated with a designated land use. The proposed project inGudes a 2,715 square-foot fast-food restaurant with dnve-thru Based on this square footage and land use, the ITE assocates a trap rate of 710 traps per 1,000 square feet. The proposed project will generate approximately 1,928 traps Traffic associated v~nth the project was protected to occur in the area as the area is designated for commercial use and is expected to generate related traffic traps Emissions associated vnth operation of the project are below SCAQMD thresholds of significance (Table 2) Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary Pounds er Da Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet. Met Unmet. Mit. Unmet Met Unmet. Mit Gradin 1 50 1 50 21 69 20 61 - - 12 08 4 93 Worker Tn s 0.01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 02 0.02 0 00 0.00 Stations E w 034 034 0.27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile E w 1 36 1 29 11.88 11.29 - - 1 00 0 95 Arch Coatin s 4.37 4 15 - - - - - - As halt 2.10 1.99 - - - - - - Totals 9 66 9 20 33.86 32 18 0.02 0 02 13 10 5.89 SCAOMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G EXISTING Operations Emissions Pounds er Da Source ROG NOx CO PM~o Unmet Mit. Unmet Mit. Unmet Met Unmet Mit. Area Source 0.00 0.00 0.03 0 03 0.01 0 01 0 00 0.00 Mobile Source 19 02 19 02 12.25 12.25 170.88 170.88 4.85 4 85 Totals 19 02 19.02 12 28 12.28 170 89 170.89 4 85 4.85 SCAQMDThres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si n~cance No No No No No No No No E35 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 7 Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds durng grading activities for PM,o and NO„ nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NO, Tables 1 and 2 show protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented Dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated. Since the region is in non-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust wall be mitigated by the following measures. 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Streets bordering the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the ske during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. b) Dunng construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and egwpment, and fugitive dust generated by egwpment traveling over exposed surtaces wdl increase NO, and PM,o levels m the area. The following mitigation measures wdl ensure impacts are at less than significant levels 1) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that ail construction equipment will be tuned and maintained In accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 2) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 3) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed protect is the construction of a 2,715 square-foot fast-food restaurant with dnve-thru and adequate parking on a 0 69-acre parcel The end use of the protect will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors ~l Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 8 PotM4ally Sipnificent lapaa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources &an ®m iu ~nM s~m,t rb I a In ten I a I a 6. TRANSPORiAT1ON/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result m: a) Increased vehicle tnps or traffic congestions () () (x) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g ,sharp () () () (x) curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g., farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby () () () (x) uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-sites () () () (x) e) Hazards or bamers for pedestnans or bicyclists? () () () (x) f) Conflicts with adopted pohaes supportng O O O (x) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rail or air traffic impacts O O O (x) Comments• a-b) The vacant pad was originally approved for a retail building. VehiGe tnps Hell increase slightly because of the intended use, however, the on-site circulation design and existing roadway improvements will accommodate the increase in traffic. Therefore, the traffic impacts will be less than significant c-f) Base Line Road and Ellena West will be used for ingress and egress. The entry is set back from the main dnve aisle intersection so that visitors to the site vinll not conflict with vehicles in the dnve aisles The proposed proled inGudes on-site parking and a fast food dnve-thru f) Located approximately 8 miles northeast of Ontano Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft g) There are no rail or air traffic impacts vwMUany Sipilfinnt sryaa Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources r~aMnallr grvn®m unless runosem 7nan atg+n®nt 110 I a m tae I a I a 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result rn rmpacts to a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their ( ) habitats (including, but not limited to. plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated species (e g., hentage trees, ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc.) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g , ( ) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~ E3`}~ O U (x) U U (x) O O (x) • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 9 Paenuany SignM®nl trryea Leee Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~ ~"; nuo~eon a~®nl „o i a in led i a i n d) Wetland habitat (e g , marsh, npanan, and veinal () () () (x) pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration comdors~ O O O (x) Comments• a) The pad currently consists of grass that is maintained once a week. No natural habitat exists on-site and the property is not within the Ontano Habitat for recovery for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF, dated September 14, 1997 Based on this and surrounding development, the site does not contain appropnate habitat for any listed or endangered species. b-c) The site contains grass and has no native vegetation on-site. d) There is no npanan or wetland habitat on-site e) Surrounding residential and commercial development in the area has eliminated any wildlife comdors that may have occurred in the past eo~enueny 9gn111®m Inpecl Less Issues and Supportng Information Sources ~,gP01e,,,,~„ ~ ~~, aa~mm ,,, 1 In led 1 ~ 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? () () () (x) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (x) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (x) resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments• a-b) The project will be required to conform to the applicable City standards for energy conservation c) There is no known resource that would be a future value to the region and the residents of the state E3~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 10 Pdmfialy Slpnlfi®nt I~atl L'ss Issues and Supporting Information Sources a~ ~'~; ~ ~,`n „ 5~mn, „a I n m tea l a I d 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A nsk of accidental explosion or release of () ( ) () (x) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to. oil, pestiades, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response () ( ) () (x) plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () ( ) () (x) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential () ( ) () (x) health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas wdh flammable () ( ) () (x) brush, grass, or trees? Comments: a,od)There is no evidence of drums, containers, hazardous wastes, or discolored sods There is no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on- site. b) The project will not interfere with the flow of traffic on Base Lme Road or Ellena West Pro/ect plans will be reviewed and approved by City departments to determine adequate access for emergency vehicles. e) The proled is not located in a high fire hazard area and is located within a shopping center ~m~fiY SIpYfi®nl I,~ea LAS Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~ ; ,~~ ~, s,~®~, „a I a m t~ I I n 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result rn: a) Increases in existing noise levels () () () (x) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? () () () (x) Comments: a-b) The protect would increase noise levels since the pad is currently vacant and the development would add people and traffic to the area. Noise levels will be consistent with existing levels, which include traffic on Base Lme Road and Ellena West and surrounding commercial use There are no sensitive receptors in the area and impacts to noise were not considered signdicant • E~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 11 Polenllally SlOnlflranl Irryed Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources 9pNfl ;'~; ~ ~tlen 5~®n, „o 1 C Into tea 1 tl I tt 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result rn a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas. a) Fire protections () () () (x) b) Police protection? () () () (x) c) Schools () () () (x) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () () (x) e) Other governmental services? () () () (x) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The project site is located on the southeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road, and is served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct The nearest fire station is located on Base Line Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard, approximately 2 miles east of the site The Distnct is responsible for evaluating the project through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process. The proposed project will include structural fire . protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code No mitigation is required Police Protection -Additional police protection is not required, as the addition of the restaurant will not change current facility operating hours and will not have a substantial increase in the area to be patrolled because the project site is relatively small, smaller than 1-acre The shopping center currently has pnvate security guards on regular patrol Schools -the proposed restaurant building vlnll not generate a substantial number of new lob opportunities or induce people to move to the protect area Therefore, construction activities will not adversely impact the local schools. Parks -Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new lob opportunities or induce people to move to the protect area. Operation of the restaurant will require 6 full-time employees that will likely be hired from within the City Therefore, construction of a restaurant will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities Public facilities -The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities and will be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Polmaauy siv+flfam IrtpeU Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources y~~„flmlij ~ ~ sin n1 as I G In lea I « I b 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result rn a need for new systems or supplies or substantial aKerat~ons to the following utildies: a) Power or natural gas? ( ) O O (x) Ey0 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2001-00519 Page 12 rro~~~r $IpYfifEnl liryaa Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~°~„' ~'„'; µ"~~„ ~,~ ®,,, no i a m ~~ i a i a b) Commurncation systems? O O O (x) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (x) faalitiesT d) Sewer or septic tanks? () () () (x) e) Stonn water drainage? () () () (x) f) Solid waste disposal? () () () (x) g) Local or regional water supplies? () () () (x) Comments• a-g) The project will extend as necessary to connect to existing systems and utilities that become available rn the immediate area. The proposed project Hall not require major modifications or alterations to the existing utility systems. r s~~naml i~caa Laa Issues and Supporting InfonnaUon Sources ~,~„~®; ,~ ~ s,„ ,,, i a i i 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? () () () (x) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? () () () (x) c) Create light or glares () () (x) ( ) Comments: a) The project site is located at the southeast comer of Base Lme Road and Ellena West, which are not considered scenic comdors by the City or the County of San Bemardmo b) The proposed project is part of the Central Park Plaza and is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Standards The proposed design and extenor elements of the restaurant will be consistent wrath design standards set forth m the City of Rancho Cucamonga Design Guideline Policies c) The project will create new light and glare because the pad is currently vacant, however, there are numerous existing light standards throughout the Central Park Plaza pariang lot which surrounds the subject property. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans, which regwre rewew for consistency with City standards The impact is not considered sigrnficent aaamaiy SpNfi®nt Irtgaa Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources s,~fl®"„ ,~eQ, ~, ~,~ , ,,, i a i ~~o i a i 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal C_~ a) Disturb paleontological resources ~~` () () () (x) • Initial Study for DRC2001-00519 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 13 raem~euy Slpnfignl Irtpsa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~m'I"; ~;~ SigNfimnt Na I a Inw tea I a I a b) Disturb archaeologicalresources~ c) Affect histoncal or cultural resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? U O O (x) O U O (x) O U O (x) U U O (x) Comments: a-e) As the site is relatively small and located vlnthin an established business center, the likelihood of affecting histoncal or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not considered sign cant vammny sla+nmm Inpea Lest Issues and Supporting Infonnatlon Sources s~ i µtlu~ ~„ ~ I a tea I a I 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional () () () (x) parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities O O O (x) Comments: a) An increased demand for neighborhood or regional parks is not likely, as the proposed restaurant will require a total of 6 full-time employees A matonty of these employees will likely reside within the City. b) The proposed protect will not affect existing recreational opportunity. The site is bordered by residential development to the east and south r1 L_~ aaeamuY Slpdnaml I~ryaa Lem Issues and Supporting Information Sources s'",,,, n~; ~ emu,,, s„,n®~t Ne I a I tee I a I a 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restnct the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator penods of California history or prehistory? O O O (x) ~y 2 Initial Studv for City of Rancho Potentlally 516nfimnl Inp"ci Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~r'mni ~uu~oon a~ mnl Na I n m laa I a I a b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential to () () () (x) achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that () () () (x) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects ) d) Substantial adverse: Dces the protect have () () () (x) environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments• a) The protect site is located vinthin the existing Central Park Plaza shopping center. The vacant pad contains grass that is maintained once a week There is no habitat suitable for rare or endangered species and there are no locally protected species on site The site has no wetland and is cut off by development to the north, east, south, and west so it cannot serve as a wildlife comdor. b) Construction will not exceed SCAOMD thresholds dunng grading activities for PM,o and NO^, nor SCAOMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NOx However, dunng grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated Since the region is in non-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust will be mitigated by the measures outlined above c) The cumulative effects of the proposed protect may include incremental increased traffic within the immediate vicinity, however, the impacts are not considered significant. The applicant will be required to pay appropriate transportation fees at the time of development Fees are used to make to roadway improvements within the area to keep the circulation at acceptable levels of service d) Development of a 2,715 square foot restaurant would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study did not identify any impacts that would have a potentially significant effects to the environment • • u Ey3 neueareu a-io . i as . aoc vue aueo -+ n ww~unw uuv uer, no Sent By. RHL DESIONnGROUP INC; 582 902 0028; Nov-16-G1 1:38PM; Page 18/18 Rao~1v~4 1f/ttlJOf Bf 87AMp ,ww,r ra r~i -+ ~..~. ~r~ •~ 11/14 2081 22;35 9094772741 ITIG PHGE 16116 Initial Study tar Clty of Rancho Cucemorga DRC2D01-00519 ~ Peae 75 EARLIER ANALYSES Eerier analyses may be used wtters. Pursuant to the trering, program E1R, or other CEt]~4 process, one or more elfede have bean adequately analyzed in en earlier EIR or Negative Dedaratlon Per Section 1tS083(cx8)(D). The effects ideniiRed above for this pro)ect were within ttre ate of and adequately anayzed fn the fdbwing eariiar daoument(s) purouant to appUCable legal atandarda, and such efiads wero atltlressed by mitigation measures based an the earlwr analysis. The following earlier anatyees were utilmed In completing this Initial Study end are available far review in the City of Rancho Lltamtonge, Planning Diviafon offices, 10500 Cwic Canter Drive (ehedc aA that aPPN)~ (x) General Plan FJR (Cerilfted April 8,1881) (x) AAaster Environmental Assessment tar the 1989 l3eneral Plan Update (SCH i-880201 ib. oertiiled January 4,1989) APPLfCANT CERTiFICATiON I certify that I am the appNc~nt for the project desaibed in itJs Intiiel Study. 1 aekrtowletlge that I have read this Initial Study arrd the proposed mitigation rtleeeurea. FuAlter, I have revised the Protect plans or proposals ertdror hereby agree to the proposed mingatbn measures to avo>d the effects a mit~ate the effects to a point vuhere dearly no slgmticant envlronmefital eftecxs would occur. Signature' Print C E yy City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.. Conddional Use Permit DRC2001-00519 Public Review Period Closes• November 28, 2001 Prolect Name: Kentucky Fried Chicken/Pizza Hut Express Project Applicant. Tncon Global Restaurants Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 7369 Milliken -APN 227-182-10 Prolect Description The development of a dnve-thru fast food restaurant consisting of 2,715 square feet on 69 acre of land in the Neighborhood Commeraal district Located at 7369 Milliken -APN 227-182-10 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the prolect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ~ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the prolect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the prolect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the prolect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Dnve (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review penod November 28. 2001 Date of Determination Adopted By ~~ RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00519, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ELLENA WEST IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 227-182-10 A Rentals 1 Tncon Global Restaurants filed an application forthe issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00519, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 28th day of November 2001, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on November 28, 2001, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 7369 Milliken Avenue with a street frontage of 423 feet and lot depth of 670 feet, and is presently improved with the Central Park Plaza, a Neighborhood Commercial Center, and b The property to the north of the subtect site is Low and Low-Medium Residential, the property to the south consists of Low-Medium Residential, the property to the east is Medium-High Residential, and the property to the west is Office Professional, and c The application contemplates the construction of a restaurant with a dnve-thru fast food restaurant, and d The site is a freestanding pad building within Central Park Plaza neighborhood commeraal complex, and e The proposed restaurant use will support the pnmary retail use of Central Park Plaza and will reduce vehicle tnps accordingly, and Eyt~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CUP DRC2001-00519 - TRICON GLOBAL NOVEMBER 28, 2001 Page 2 f The protect meets the basic intent of the Dnve-thru Design Policy, in that it has a compatible architecture style with the surrounding uses within the center, and the respect to the 45-foot dnve-thru setback from the street frontage, and g The parking spaces within Central Park Plaza neighborhood commercial are avatlable to the proposed restaurant via a reaprocal parking agreement and, h The protect with the recommended Conditions of Approval, complies with all minimum City development standards, i The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan obtective to provide commercial faalibes to meet the service needs of the community, which are conveniently accessible 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wdl not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect wdl have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that wdl result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect which are listed below as Conditions of Approval 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Eye PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CUP DRC2001-00519 - TRICON GLOBAL NOVEMBER 28, 2001 Page 3 Planning Division 1) Dense landscaping shall be incorporated around the east leg of the dnve-thru to provide additional dnve-thru screening 2) All roof and ground-mounted egwpment and utilities shall be fully screened 3) Speaal paving shall be introduced where pedestnans cross dnve aisles 4) All signs proposed for the budding shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and the Uniform Sign Program for the complex and shall regwre review and approval by the City Planner, pnor to installation ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 2) Street bordenng the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energyefficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's speafications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean-alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution E`~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CUP DRC2001-00519 - TRICON GLOBAL NOVEMBER 28, 2001 - Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Larry T McNiel, Chaimtan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of November, by the following vote-to-wit. AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS Eel City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00519 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitgation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements• Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency (Planning Droision) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2001-00519-TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS November 28, 2001 Page 2 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring Hell be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forrn 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements oradditions An MMP Reporting Fomt will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of bwlding pemtits. r~ E S\ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2001-00519 Applicant: Tricon Global Restaurants Initial Study Prepared by: _Emily Wimer Date: November 6. 2001 .. - - .. .- ., .. ... .. , Alr Quah ,' ~ •`'' ~a. ', ~~;,~}y„ ^~4~f-~~.~»,~~ '~r ~~ I ~ y ~ , ~ ~ ~4mm.~aa ,yg~4.;'. ~~~ ~~~ '• ,,' ~ . The site shall be treated with water or other BO B Ongoin A/B soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and g 2/4 RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Street bordering the site shall be swept CE C Ongoing A 2 according to a schedule established bythe City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary de endin u on time of ear of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind CE C Ongoing A 2/4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site dunng such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD CE C Ongoing A / and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive 2 4 construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall select the CP/BO C Plan Check A p construction egwpment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energy efficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or CP/BO C Ongoing A p/4 clean-alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible m lS r' The construction contractor shall ensure that CP/BO B Ongoing A construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off egwpmentwhen not in use Key to Checklist Abbreviations ,~ 3 Res onsible'P ~ - ~ ~ ~ p arson'=x - ~ ;. 3 r ~Moni ~,°~~"~"~ toMingnFre~enc~~ "Y;'~ ~~ '~' ~ ~ ~,Met~oc~ of Ver a to ~ ; - ' ~_ - ^~~~_" A; _,,«~ ..." n'w'~s' ~, _'"~'"~ s n ~l ns~ : ~ ~ CDD - Commurnty Development Director A -With Each New Development ...r, ,. A - On-site Inspection a 9, o , r;st~~,N s~: .-~ {~,., c 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee 8 -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Offiaal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies / 4 -Stop Work Order Plans) PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP m ~ ~ ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00519 SUBJECT: KFC/PIZZA HUT EXPRESS APPLICANT: TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS LOCATION: 7369 MILLIKEN AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: +~ General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aftemabve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, rts agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at rts sole discretion, partiapate at rts own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and imga6on plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Penmt, Vanance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if budding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, extenor matenals and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Central Park Plaza cntena Sc-04-0, C 5y ComdeUOn Date -~ - _/ / -~ - _/ / Prqect No DRC2001-00519 Completion Date 2 Pnor to any use of the proled sde or business activity being commenced thereon, all Condtions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner _ _ 3 Occupancy of the facildies shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Budding Code and / / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Pnor to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnd and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance poor to occupancy 4 Revised sde plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/ / submitted for Cdy Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of budding pernits 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, _/_/_ all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding pernd issuance 6 All ground-mounted utildy appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be _/ / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berning, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vauRs 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/ / owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Crty Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Crty Engineer review and approved poor to the issuance of building pernds D. Shopping Centers 1 A uniform hardscepe and street furniture design inGuding seating benches, trash receptaGes, _/ / free-standing potted plants, file tom bike racks, light bollards, etc , shall be utilized and be wmpalible with the arohitedural style Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval poor to the issuance of bwldmg permds 2 Provide for the following design features in each trash enGosure, to the satisfaction of the Cdy _/ / Planner a ArohRecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping centerKhe protect) _/ / 3 Graffdi shall be removed within 72 hours _/_/_ 4 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debns at all times and in no event shall trash and _/ / debns remain for more than 24 hours 5 All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply wdh the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants a Noise Level -All commercial adivdies shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/ /_ extenor noise level of 60 d6 dunng the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m and 65 d6 dunng the hours of l a m until 10 p m b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, Dosing, or _/_/ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building matenals, garbage cans, or other similar obfects between the hours of 10 p m and 7 a m unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 6 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestnan walkway, and plaza _/_/ They shall be of bnck/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof Full samples shall be submtted for City Planner review and approval poor to the . issuance of building permds 5~-04-0, z E5~ Prgeot No DRC2001-00519 Gomoletion Date 7 The lighting fuduro destgn shall compltment the arohrtedural program It shall indude the plaza _/ /_ area lighting fudures, budding Itghtmg factures (extenor), and parictng lot lighting factures 8 The destgn of store fronts shall compltment the archrtedural program and shall have subtle _/ /_ vanattons subfect to Design Review Committee approval pnorto the issuance of building permits E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ protections, shall be shielded from wew and the sound buffered from ad/scent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building destgn and constructed to the satisfaction of the Crty Planner Details shall be tnduded rn building plans F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts _/ !_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstrudton, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parlung lot landscape islands shall have a mmtmum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/ /_ contain a 12-loch walk adtacent to the parlung stall (tndudtng curb) 3 Textured pedestnan pathways and textured pavement across crroulatton aisles shall be provided _/ / throughout the development to connect dwelltngs/untts/butldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double sloped per Ctty standards and all dnveway aisles, entrances, _/ /_ • and ewts shall be sloped per Crty standards 5 Plans for any secunty gates shall be submitted for the Ctty Planner, Ctty Engineer, and Rancho _/ / Cucamonga Frre Protection Dtstnd review and approval pnorto issuance of building pennrts For residential development, pnvate gated entrances shall provide adequate tam-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking Into the public nght-of-way 6 Btcyde storage spaces shall be provtded to all commerotal, office, industnal, and multifamily _/ / residential protects or more than 10 units Mtntmum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parkng spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicyde storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parlung spaces Warehouse distnbution uses shall provide bicyde storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent on the required automobile parlung spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this resuks to a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number G. Landscaping 1 Wrthtn parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parlung _/_/ stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 2 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adtacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/ / tree per 30 linear feet of building SC-0401 3 ~~ n Prgect No DRC2001-00579 Comoledon Dale H. Signs • 1 The signs indicated on the submdted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/ / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply wdh the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans incuding the following _/_/ a Sde/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electncal Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main swdch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometncs, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, focture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number ~ e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) Geady identified on the • outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/ /_ Archdect's/Engineei's stamp and "wet" signature are required pnor to plan check submittal 3 Separate pennds are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and Cdy licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/ the Cdy pnor to pennd issuance 5 Business shall not open for operation pnor to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/ / Building and Safety Division J. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submdted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked wdh the protect file number (e ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Undone Mechanical Code, Undone Plumbing Code, National Electnc Code, Tdle 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of paned application Please contact the Bwlding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Pnor to issuance of building permds for a new commercial or industnal development or adddion _/ / to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may inGude, but are not limded to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checlung Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division pnor to paned issuance SC-04-01 4 [~ ~~ Protect No DRC2001-00519 ComoleGon Date 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter) K. New Structures , Provide compliance with the California Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of budding permits 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A L. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Bulding Code, Ctty Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Cwd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained ,-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be vandal-resistant fixtures 5~-04-0, 5 E ~~ _~_~ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~-~- -~-~ -~-~- -~-~. -~-~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- Project No DRC2001-00519 Comolehon Date N. Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used O. Windows 1 Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic P. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be contrasting color and shall be reflectroe for nighttime wsibiljty Q. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm rf needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system wjll reduce the amount of false alarms and m tum save dollars and Ijves 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- / / r1, ~J SC-04-01 6 `~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION INCOMPLETENESS COMMENTS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0429-A PROJECT #: DRC2001-00519 PROJECT NAME: KFC/Pizza Hut DATE: November 13, 2001 PLAN TYPE: CUP for Fast Food Restaurant APPLICANT NAME: LDC Cougar OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group A, Dwtston 3 as proposed FLOOR AREA (S): 2253 square feet LOCATION: 7369 Milliken FD REVIEW BY Steve Locate, Fire Protection Plannin Spectaltst • PLANNER: Emily Wimer ALL OF THE FOLL OWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based on the plans submtted and may not inGude all Fire Distnct requirements for the proposed protect Changes m the profed may result in additional or changed Fire Distnd regwrements Please make the necessary changes or collections pnor to resubmitting for review Pnor to approval by the Planning Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed All Fue District condtions and comments must be addressed for construction permds can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to venfy compliance A. Community FatahUes Distracts This protect is subtect to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Fatalities Distnct B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the appl~taant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire Distnct and the Water Distnct 2 Pnor to the issuance of any building permt, the applicant shall submit construction plans, speafications, Flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for review and approval by the Fire Distnct Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards E~eo 3 Fire flow requirements for this protect shall be 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The required fire Flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 4 When any portion of a facility or building is located in excess of 150-feet from a fire hydrant located a public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall b provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 5 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible building matenals on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distnd personnel shall rasped the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submd test report to the Fire Safety Division 6 Ali prnate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivenng any combustible building matenals on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division 7 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the budder/developer in the presence of the Water Distnct or Fire Construction Services, as appropnate The buildeddevelopershatl submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 8 Ewsting fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval InGude main size 9 Pnor to the issuance of any budding permit, the applicant shall submd construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground 10 Required Note If the system is pnvate the applicant shall do the following pnor to the issuance of the budding pennd Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the Distnd For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, which shall be submdted to the Fire Distnd for acceptance 11 Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or dnveway in accorclance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct and Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga Engineenng Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reilectrve Hydrant Markers " On pnvate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner C. WaterAvadabihty Pnor to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnd Water Availabdrtv for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water Distnd and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protedron District If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire exlingwshing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow D. Automatic Fire spnnkler Systems RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed throughout the building(s) 2 All commercial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire spnnkler system Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fird spnnkler system Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit E~1 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 5 The fire sprinkler system monitonng system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitonng is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more spnnklers in all other Occupancies E. Fire Access 1 Fire Distnd access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building construded when any portron of the facility or any portron of an extenor wall of the first story of the bwldmg is located more than 150-feet from approved fire distrid vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the extenor of the facility or bwldmg 2 Fire Distnd access roadways shall include public roads, streets, highways, as well as pnvate roads, streets and designated fire lanes 3 Commercial Pnor to recordation of a subdivisionRrad/parcel map or the issuance of any grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire Distnd for all Fire Distnd access roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the extenor of every strudure on-site 4 Residential 8 Commeroial Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or pnvate, from the Fire Distnd in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall indude the plan view, sedional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be cleady marked when adead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise requirod Applicable CCBR's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstrudions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or ocher modfications in fire lanes or access roadways without poor wntten approval of the Fire Drstnd, Fire Safety Division 5 The minimum unobstruded width for a Frre Distnd access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the mrnrmum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 6 A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed poor to final inspedion Proof of purchase shall be submitted poor to final bwldmg plan approval Contad the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordenng information 7 Trees and shrubs plartted in any median shall be kept tnmmed to a mrnrmum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehiGes 8 A note shall be placed on all plans which Geady indicates the followrng Emergency access, a mrnrmum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and Gear of any obstrudions at all times dunng construdion, in accordance with Fire Distnd Standards 9 Pnor to the issuance of a bwldmg permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire Distnd for fire lanes on required Fire Distnd access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A dravnng of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire Distnd standarcls shall be submitted to and approved Contad the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protedion Distnd at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 10 Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fin; lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identity who is responsible for not less than annual inspedion and maintenance of all required fire lanes 11 New buildings other than dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and eledncaily illuminated dunng penods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance ~~Z 12 In mutts-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwlding identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, swtes, or bwldings The Fire Distnd shall review and approve the numbenng plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Phased pro/ects or temporary fuel modification plans must meet the regwrements for permanent and be approved by the Frre Distnd F. Combustible Construction Letter Required Note Pnor to the issuance of a bwlding permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire Distnct on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire Distnd Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible matenal is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times G. Architectural Building Plans Pnor to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a bwlding permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Distnd Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans poor to submittal H. Fire Suppression System (Required for Commercial Cooking Equipment or Special Hazards) Poor to the issuance of a building permit, plans, and specifications for the fire suppression system for the protection of commercial-type cooking equipment shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit Poor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire suppression system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Service Construction Services Fire Alarm System ~ 1 An automatic fire alarm (and detection) system is required by RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area, or by another adopted code or standard 2 Pnor to issuance of a building permit, plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for rewew and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Distnd permit 3 Pnor to any remodel, modification, additions, or exchange of devices, Fire Distnd approval and a permit are required Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services 4 Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm (and detection) system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services J. Rre Distnd Fees Due Fire Distnd fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" Nell be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fue Distnd as follows ' a $82 Stag-up fee for commercial, industnal or multi-family dwelling units (Paid poor to TRC) b $t 32 Conditional Use Permit Fee (CUP) c $132 for Pnvate Fire Mains or Fire Spnnkler Underground Water Supply d $677 (per new building) for New Commercial and Industnal Development 'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire spnr alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc), and/or any consultant reviews Noll be assessed separate submittals of plans ~l K. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be requued, dependent upon intended use a General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions, which may be hazardous to life or property b Operate a place of public assembly c Compressed gases (storage, handling, or use exceeding 100 cubic feet L. Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations 1 The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions require that the San Bemardino County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fue, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 3 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated 4 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pesticides, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount 5 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount 6 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 7 Any business subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III Generally, EPCRA inGudes facilRies that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, inGuding retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement, however, EPCRA does require full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA facilRies are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance . 10 Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is regwred to submit a Plan, is requued to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner E~{ 11 The Fire Code adopted by the Fire Distnct has a provision regwnng collection of information regarding hazardous materials at faalities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Pnor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan - New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire Distnct after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department In some cas~ additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs M. Plan Submittal Reqwred Nobce Plans shall be submRted and approved poor to construction in accordance wdh 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electncal and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant rewews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans n LJ ~~~ r~. ANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE. November 28, 2001 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Larry Henderson, AICP, Prinapal Planner SUBJECT TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBER APPOINTMENTS On November 14, 2001, Planning Commissioners Mannenno and Stewart interviewed . prospective applicants for the bicycle representative position on the Trails Advisory Committee Although all of the candidates interviewed would be qualified to serve, the Commission Sub- committee unanimously recommends the appointment of Tim Mitchell as primary, and Bnan Zupke as the alternate Their extensive bicycling background and enthusiasm for serving will be a great asset to the Trails Advisory Committee A copy of both applications is attached for reference (Exhibit "A") Respectfully submitted, ~~ / /~ Brad Buller City Planner BB LH/tc Attachment• Exhibit "A" - Copy of Tim Mitchell and Bnan Zupke Trails Advisory Committee applications • ITEM F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga invites applications for amember--at-large to represent the equestrian commundy and amember-at-large to represent the bicycling community. This Committee reviews proposed development pro/ects to advise the Planning Commission on the location and design of traUs. The Committee meets on an as needed bans on the second Wednesday of each month at 6 00 p.m. Applicants must be at least 18 years old and a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. Equestrians must be an active member of the Alta Loma Riding Club. CHECK ONE: ^ Equestrian ~ Bicyclist C~ NAME: % / M I/~l VI~~'~~-kR !f DAYTIME PHONE #:~4~t~c~,Q~-3`f7S' EMAIL (Optional): ~ClM r~ z~i ~ ~O( ~`"^ - RESIDENCEADDRESS: ~`~3~ 64r/,4G.oa~ c~ ZIP CODE: ~°1'7CJ/ ~ _ Bnefly describe your nding experience (i.e., type of nding, miles per week, years experience): • 3 (e 2. 3. 4. P~ 9-erz T L•ee4s ~ A ~A; a.:~. ~,~ ~y-es Why are you interested in serving on this Committee? rt ~~~ Ef22 [ ~ouJ ~ N ~~~'~ n _ ~ ~ /~.l1- What do you feel are the critical trail issues in Rancho Cucamonga? ' /C A c lS ~ r<<~P n List all equestrian or bicycling organizations you are actively involved in: ~ f~ A J>; ~`~~'J _ -. o, .. .. i .,A d ~OLs ~' -~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~,~ss rC . " z ~--~ r • Signature • ~~ ~ ~''L crate ~xh~ b~~ to ~ Planning Division, Please mall completed application 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. For further information, please call (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday, from 7:OOa.m. to 6:00 p.m. • CYCLIST WANTED The City of Rancho Cucamonga invites applications to serve on the City's Trails Advisory Committee. The City is looking for an individual with a strong interest in promoting bicycle trails. This Committee advises the Planning Commission on bicycle, hiking and equestrian trails. U~Applicants must be at least 18 years old and a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. The Candidate should be an experienced bicycle rider familiar with the needs of the cyclist. The Committee meets on the second Wednesday of each month from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The position will remain open until filled. please contact Larry Henderson at (909) For applications and further information, 477-2750. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEP 2 7 2001 RECEIVED -PLANNING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY pF RANCHO CUCgMDNGq OCT p 42001 RECEIVED - p~gNNING • CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ~nv~tes appl~cahons for amember-at-large to represent the equestrian communiy and amember-at-large to represent the bicydmg community. This Committee reviews proposed development proleds to advise the Planning Commission on the location and design o/ trails. The Committee meets on an as needed basis on the second Wednesday of each month at 6.00 p..m. Applicants must be at least t 8 years old and a res,dent of Rancho Cucamonga. Equestrians must bean active member of the Alta Loma Riding Club. CHECKONE.• ^ Equestrian /- [~ Bicyclist NAME: ~ ~ I an Z~, plc DAYTIME PHONE #:C9°g) ~6i - 6~~3 MAIL O tional)• r; an . ~ap~P @ Pn t'rwcrk5. Cvm E ( p RESIDENCE ADDRESS: 9313 /~il~sisr ~ '~'^ ~ ^ ZIP CODE: 9/ ~ 3 7 2. Briefly describe your nding experience 1(i~.e., type of ndingLG,~~ miles per week, years experience). /„t, ~jFPn /~o%n~ ~'ir GtSak~ l I~Fa'1 Gs'! T~~ /od.~l YR~f-r~fi~~r n./ioA+~,os/L-~ Why.~a~re you interested in G{iu7-r+-F~rF, din vF on this Committee? To ~~ ~°~ ~ ~Josi~i yr 3. What do you feel are the critical trail issues in Rancho Cucamonga? ~ I"5"~`i't~""/ v1`"" ~°" <~ ~~rIS Uf %va g,vaf aF er~•.s~cr ~, a„fLLo ~Fl~c (~+el ~~~ ~..+>~/(~.•lJ1C~ E.~,sH,~ f^*,~s n,.~ {.,r~~ ~7ain~rins.l ~ ~-.ri~f'/nj 7~i/1 in°~rors/`~° ~ ~icj.c% /^W~E-s l.~/ N. Lfi//IK/yc~l fv r-~rd~4~'r,v,/s lir~~~~ f/n-•'s G ~~ >f ~iof.-~ 4. List all equestrian or bicycling organizations you are actively involved in: Cyc1,~~ ~~~•,«h<., /3~~y~/~ c/U~ 929 ~/ Sign re ~' 1 Date Please mall completed application ~1 to ~ Planning Dfv/slon, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. For further information, please call (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday, from 7:OOa.m. to 6:00 p.m. CYCLIST WANTED The City of Rancho Cucamonga invites applications to serve on the City's Trails Advisory Committee. The City is looking for an individual with a strong interest in promoting bicycle trails. This Committee advises the Planning Commission on bicycle, hiking and equestrian trails. Applicants must be at least 18 years old and a resident of Rancho Cucamonga. The Candidate should be an experienced bicycle rider familiar with the needs of the cyclist. The Committee meets on the second Wednesday of each month from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. The position will remain open until filled. For applications and further information, please contact Larry Henderson at (909) 477-2750. ~7~Yrr ~ FINISH AND COLOR LEGEND O EIFS wqu EiEm suRF+cE stucco z>xpeusr i RELO COLOfi C0.0R i0 NAiCn PRAZEE PFIx15 EL c.-o TOP OFIDP of i~ EL 2a-o A a O FR>vED AUx VLS _ IDP OF iGWE4 ~ $Y-KiC 9I PP E9]I REO IE /~ V' ~xtES C n f E ~5 X pa vi iO unic gAZEE +SDEU ~5 ~ - O < M e K le $LLRLO 44sONRY FLOCK ' _ ~" LMOR ip NaiCR f9nZEE egxi5 5]SCN O V 5 iM1E CO4P+NY $iNAILNi E+RREL 1RE5 CDLLR EL GuVO ELExp YAM EL1 WLLORL+ 6 ~ Q Q e0 +lNN V114 SiOREFRONi NVDOM$ PPE-RNSn OngK PRONZE exWREp TRICON CLOB4L 5 " ` Q RESTAORANT I\C _ _ ~ , )} ~ O wood mEUls CLwPIC SAIx $ENIiRarvsP+REVi siuN ON RR pgp~ y0N KgRMAN a P+Ixi ip 4aiCN Tit>ZEE 151]34 , 5 ~RNNE CA 9164 l~ ~ -~~ • N '~'~+'O © LiLIFORVCA PflE^ +Si SiCxE 1x[ > ~ ~ f1 Q - `~~ ( _ . C0.0R i0 MaiCM ER+ZEE PAINTS 531 W RCOEp ~i~~ ~ / ~. - t y OCCORAIK CEiaulc -LE CCExiS ]'.] CIYPQ ~ ~ - ~E i ~ CO' EVROe4 SERIES M En-ES a I L NL_ qY( 1` ~ / ~ iJ ` ~ ' ` - ~-(~ O ~ / E PftpPpSEp SILxPLY 10 COM~ORM ip CEx1NnL e+RK PL+ZA 51CN P50LR+N AN EE APP-npVEO EY inE CITY pE ~ J , ~ y a RAnLnD cuL+upxc. ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ 8 ~ m ,gyp x - x EL 9 ' ~ d 0 NS"CO~~ ~~IFW . `~~- TOP 0 C N ~ 4 ~ ~~ 6 ~ _ ~ ~L~ ~~ u~ 4YP' ~_'W_ J eA.;s 9~'i,. 0. ^ ~ ~ u~4gA ` ~M o 5 F 3 ~ g R C Oo e . 0 ? ~ u c5C 0 "f ~ i i O 00 0 a + urt ~ EAST ELEVATION SLALE I/a .I-~ 975 3 40 i nb m I - O 2 `X t Y V ~a 4L - ,~~ EL 25 -0 .~ ~^ 3 e EL ]<-6 TOP OG TOWER E E STOP OF TOWER ~ to C ~ ~ O w O Od L S N N a ~d o O E EL iB -6 O W ~ 9a L~~~jjj~ V _ ~ µ 5 OF WALL EOP ~ ~ rc= O , ' ? N_ x ioP 0 pMPEi V A i S 8 q ,y,..- ("'' _-_l b+ 7 ~N. - :N° - +., r:i ~ ~--v^„ vm- r Um~ Y L33' ~ d ~K ~ ~ F n ~ ~ J J s ~~ s , ~i__ _~~ ., w urt rm'nlw ~ °° ~ ® ,oil olm ma. m+IOm 5 ~,,~,.ypp i O~mpF E,ff~ BgNp Of COLUNN ~' ' -i ~ ~. N ~ ~~fY JJ ~T vA"r-~c~urt 5 L y lp ~ 'AP I m - d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fiUItDY:O ttFE I r ~ Y/ ~. .u NO KPx50 KPx50 L ' EL -o -6 . 0 -o wxuN w ~ °~ ~ ~O o,roE~,sNLA NORTH ELEVATION - sc+LE i~. -i -o SIOxi xAPnR .- 11-8326 Sx[D rN~B@ 4.1