Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/02/27 - Agenda PacketC(~UI,-~r- • C~ "~ `; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO•NGA ~- PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 27, 2002 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Macias Corn. Mannenno _ Com Stewart _ Com Tolstoy _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 13, 2002 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion If anyone has concern over any dem, rt should be removed for discussion A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00317 -STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for three previously approved tentative tract maps consisting of 172 single- famdy lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of Etiwanda North Speafic Plan in the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located at the southeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue - APN 225-101-31, 45, and a portion of 43 Related file Tract(s) 14497, 14498, and 15838 Staff has prepared a determination that the protect is within the scope of pnor environmental documents B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00570 - WF CONSTRUCTION - A request to construct four industrial bwldings (Bwlding A - 9071 square feet, Building B - 9,060 square feet, Bwiding C - 28,931 square feet, Bwlding D - 40, 240 square feet) on 4 61 acres of land m the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located at the southeast side of Center Avenue and Ellen Street, and at the east side of Cartilla Avenue -APN 1077- 401-17 and 21 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15732 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion o/ the related pro/ect Please wait to be recogn¢ed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opm~ons shall be I~mrted to 5 minutes per individual for each pro/ect Please sign ~n after speaking C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15732 - WF CONSTRUCTION - A request to subdivide a 2 71 acre property into three parcels (Parcel 1 - 29,353 square feet, Parcel 2 - 26,009 square feet, Parcel 3 - 62,775 square feet) in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located at the southeast side of Center Avenue and Ellen Street - APN 1077-401-21 Related file Development Review DRC2001- 00570 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration D TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15665 - PARAGON DEVELOPMENT CORP -The proposed subdivision of 33 77 acres into 4 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 14), located north of the terminus of Santa Anita Avenue, east of Day Creek Channel -APN 229-283-48 Related File Preliminary Review 00- 10 VI. NEW BUSINESS E DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00545 - ARNE ERIKSON - A request to construct a 3,487 square foot single-family home on 2 74 acres of land in the Hillside Residential District, on Skyline Road, north of Almond Street -APN 200-441-68 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS • • Page 2 • r1 LJ IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adloumment time if items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the C'.OmmISSIOn THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL ADJOURN TO A WORKSHOP IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING IN THE RAINS ROOM TO DISCUSS PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2002-00081 - RODRIGUEZ AND PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2002-00086 -ISLANDS RESTAURANT. 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Secretary of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby cemfy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 21, 2002, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~wc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~,-~.s~ Page 3 Vicinity Map Planning Commission February 27, 2002 E Hil B. B, C A City of Rancho Cucamonga ~ CITY HALL N c -o c c T"' > ~ ~ Y ~ c6 =_ L = U Q i n e c i t y o f I2 A N C fl O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: February 27, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY• Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001- 00317 -STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for three previously approved tentative tract maps consisting of 172 single-family lots m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Speafic Plan m the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, l ocated at the southeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue - APN. 225-101-31, 45 and a portion of 43 Related file. Tract(s) 14497, 14498, and 15838 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A Project Density 3.27 units per acre B. Surroundmo Land Use and Zoninc North - Vacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant Land (future park and school site); Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Land, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing Single-Family Residences, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Utility Corridor C. General Plan Designations Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential and Flood Control/Utility Corridor D Site Characteristics The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously the University Planned Development), a 715 residential unit protect originally approved as part of the University/Crest Planned Development bythe County in May 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga The site has been recently rough graded and streets and storm drains are under construction The site is bordered by vacant ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00317 -STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES February 27, 2002 Page 2 land (proposed residential development) to the north and west. To the east of the site is an existing single-family development and utility corndor To the south will be a future park and school site About 1,500 feet to the south is the newly constructed Route 30 Freeway. Access to the site is from Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue. BACKGROUND' In June1991, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors approved the University/Crest Planned Development m the Citys Etiwanda North area. The University/Crest Planned Development entitlements combined two separately owned properties with 1,238 single-family lots, commercial, school, park, and open space On October 26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors approved a revision to the Development Plan, which among other things, separated the University portion of the development from the Crest portion. The University portion of the development has since become Rancho Etiwanda ANALYSIS' A General' The applicant is proposing to develop 172 single-family homes on 3 tracts approved under the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development Agreement (Tract 14497, 14498 and 15838). The homes will include 10 floor plans and 5 architectural styles The square footage of the homes range m size from 2,507 to 3,334 square feet. The architectural styles of the protect include Ranch, Country, Bungalow, and Spanish. The homes will also include porches on comer lots, side-on garages, and additional enhanced architecture on elevations, which back and side onto Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue. The protect will be built in 10 phases B. Design Review Committee: On January 15, 2002, the Design Review Committee (Stewart, McNiel, Fong) reviewed the protect and recommended approval of revised plans presented by the applicant The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to staff's comments with additional conditions (Exhibit "F`). C. Technical Review Committee The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the protect and recommended approval subtect to the conditions outlined m the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions D Environmental Assessment: In June of 1991, the San Bemardmo Board of Supervisors certified the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 88082915) for the Unversity/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October26, 1999, the Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the Development Plan, which among other things, separated the University (Rancho Etiwanda) portion of the protect from the Crest portion The subtect tracts fall within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development In August of 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues associated with adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes m the protect that would regwre a mator revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report ~-a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00317-STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES . February 27, 2002 Page 3 CORRESPONDENCE. This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the project site RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2001-00317 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB DF.mlg Attachments. Exhibit °A" Exhibit °B" Exhibit °C" . Exhibit 'D" Exhibit °E" Exhibit "F" Draft Reso -Site Utilization Map - Technical Site and Phasing Plan -Grading Plans and Wall Sections - Elevations and Floor Plans - Day Creek and Interior Street Scenes - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated January 15, 2002 ution of Approval with Conditions Tt ~_ ~_ SNEET INDF% 1 COVER SHEET - INpE% MAP SItE UiILIUiION MAP 2 TECHNICAL SITE PUN INDE% 1 MAP AND PHASING PLAN TECHNICAL SITE PUN TECHNICAL SITE PUN 5 TECHNICAL SITE PLAN 6 SECTIONS LEGEND ZONE "C ZONED "L' GOR LOW OENSIIV HOUSING 1~ xm PREPARED FOR ;~ STANDARp PACIITC Hon¢s ! Ix o lYrn• DIVi•IOY x55 (xSx RINCOM SIR[(I SNI( xp0 eoxaNA ee v$mv-wea owoN( (aoa) mx-esoa (aoa) vx-esm PREPARED DY .. RANGHO ETIWANDA NO 14487~W4 8 815838 TRACT NO 1{197 • LOT$ 1-03 TMCT NO tt{96 LOTS 1-50 TRACT NO 156J6 • LOTS 1-t9 :OVER SHEET, INDEX MAP SITE UTILIZATION MAP R[VIS[0 eFPi[YBLR $B $~I e[/I[YB[R IB $p31 NA[[ p[VIS[0 !YN[ S Ippl MOV[YB[R [ }ppl C•i[ PR[PAREO MC[YBLR IB xWl SHEET ~ OF V s s 000 `'I Z20 ~~~ ~I i~ J- ~W ~M1 ~b 2~ J~ ~I 6W t~ F U ~_ 0 3 J o ge s~ 0 ~os ~ ~•'~8 a o__ _ a ~ ~.,., ~1~ N m O C a ~ m a zPam '-~" 3~b o00 W>aD .~°n ~Sa~ ~~^ 2 v ~aa44g yaam O ~FF Z Y^YSIYYYYYYYYY Y~Y ~ OPP " ; x ~ Y ~a~ "i~s ~6 :,:sSR. }te 7R ~~i~~~~~~~~~~;g~~ ~ ~~~ X Z sss a .. rr U. 9m, z z „fix Q I-+ e 0. 1Q~I 8 8 g W yy °nWg Z a Q ~_ a U ¢ E -", ,z~, ~ e U F ~~~ W e ~ I ~i i N~ W~ g~ I 3 ~ I €I ~ ~ ggg9ggg ~ ~ °~ 6i5~iiF eii sa~ I 41 = n_ ~3X: :: ..e I ~ .~ ! I ~ I I I I °~ S ~ 5 E Fg" fIR R- S ! 4S ~R _ 14 .4 4 -R ~S ° 44 ! ~ S- S Y -411 5- 1 U ~l i . I 9 q ^$ 9 m 4 g I I ~ I I I y ~ 9p w ~ 9 ~ I I I 1 I I ~ y ~ ~~ ii N _ I _ _ .. I I 1 3 I I I 1 I I I ~. [yg- °i ! Y -4 'S _ - fn Xf A .q. .. T -S S _ S . f1 S R I R- f4 ! • _ __ __ _ _ I I_ _ _ I _ I I .,r -' \\ ~ a ~ ~ ~~~~~ n m ~~ \\\ f €a ~r / 4 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 fr~ ~ 9 5 5 6 y-!c dt r-~ ~~L~I~bT Kp~i, ~ i -,, - - r . ~~ _ _ ~ ~~_- rI I( ! _ ~ _ _ ___ ____ _ T_ _______ ~ __ _ __ ___ _ " __ ___ -_ __ - _ Y •~~ _ • ~_ __ 1 y _ • J ~~ ~ - _~-.~_ __~__~_._._~___..~.._~_ _~~ __VeNUE (21rx ~~=~t ~. ~ __ ___ ___ _ -__ ______ _v ~~ ~_ -~_ _ c~^ d?$` n i /"~ r -J I - F ,~iy Ia ,• ~ ' .. \ {s F I '~ ai. 'g _ °`v H n i~ • \~ _ `ii •i I 111 T .: 5 'F ,•I .W li P I - . __ _ __ 6~ i . 0. ; „ a ~' u P __ __ ~' i •li ,r ..: ~ o bn ~i r ~ . i;~ ~ - - b ( ~ _ ~ 1 1 ~ . . ____ __ f J ~ _ ~ I_r/~ 1 ___ /~ 1 ~_ .~--~_~ - a c _ ~. a9e ~~3 --------- ~~,~-~_ eA~~ _ i -- ----= ----k „r 9 --. i. N ~ ~l 6 _ - J) ~~ 'i 16 c •~ ~• s' ~ ~-I (~I~ ,.. ~!. ' a,,.. - _ - ,o_ ~, ~_ - '~ ~ - = P ' ® ~..ts ®s 'i ) "' ps ~ ,. c u ~ ~~_~~ PREPARED FOR SLANDARD PACIFY Flonus vu~~i][ce~NUeri ~~ieo smn zoo [ .N[ (909) ])]-1500 (909) ]]$-9]10 PREPARED BY ~~~s~ ~T ~I~~Ip~f ~2~I~r7Ii}~ ~~ ~~ r~ ?-. rj~ r. ~~~~~ PHASE BOUNDARY TRALT BOUNDARY -- pgOPOSEO WATER LINE -•- pgOPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE SO RICHEST RESIDEN-Al LOT NO N PROPOSED FIgE HYDRANT 0 RV (tx 510E YARD ON ° PROPOSED STREET LIGHT - GARAGE SIDE) PROPOSED DAYLIGHT FILL A A 1_ T C) ® x t SLOPE PgEPLOi ERONT BUILDING PORCH }--1 GRADING SECRON (SEE SHEET 6) ® PREPIOi RFAR BUILDING PORCH - HEIGHT OE RETAINING WALL O DROPPED GARAGE OS PROPOSED RETAINING WALL• D DROPPED GAIUGE 1 0 n- TOP OG CURB ELEVATION •SEE UNDSCAPE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL IYPE R ii• .,~, ~ , i~.,o,Y., .,.17 !_ h -- ~10 ~~` B~ `~~ !!. ' ~ ' ¢ a~ i I t m' ~ v~~. ;i ~I ~)I, ~.. Ix s .I f n. ~ , ~I II , j 1 'I F- n® - _ _ Pe o' I I~ .~. .I [ 7 ~.~~u, >v, e ~, ~ 39 ® ~ •.. ,., ,~.. I~ .Ilx = M [• D' 1 ~i' ~Ua~~~ ~~,R. -- RANCHO ETIWAI~A TENTATIVE TRACT rio 144aT, ease a 15838 TMCT NO 1{{9) • LO15 I-)} TRACT NO I{{98 • LOTS 1-50 1RACi NO 158]8 • LOTS 1-{9 TECHNICAL SiTE PLAN 01[[ R[VISLD 5[P[f YBCR za }ppl S[A[Y•[R IE 5001 Dw[ p[ns[D rvN[ s zoos Nav[YxR a x9Di 0•SC PR[PYI[D /M~[Y•Ep I9 //0{{01 ~~~ SHEET 3~OFlUJ • ,'1 i ~ I ~ _ I ~~ ~~~' .~ ~,~ it ' ~~~ y~ II'~~ - z~ J ~-~ ~~ ~~ ,~~ 31'.11} (k; - 1 i.-.• smear w d~~......!!! I ~~ J :5 61i.,~1 ~`,'•~n. sr I 1 A . I II 1 ~ o~l JO / I ~ ~~~ I i ' B7 PREPARED FOR '.~l SIANDARp PACIFIC Hot.~S 1 [et.XO IYII•• DIYIIIOX xA Gst 91nLM 5IR[Lt Bull[ ]0p LOROX. LA 9}919-1]JO PROM[ (9091 ]]3-9500 fIR (909) J)1-9510 PREPARED RY .. e• ' f! ^ 1 31REeT w .~ ~ I I I 1 B: .9: • ~ f 'I a ~ 'a m m .. '~ 9. • ,5 E ,5 IJ ~ ~ ~~~a ri .m ~ ~^. S ~.~ •' n a O p, III ,~9 ,A '~ [ ' ' . i .~ n,. -- ---- ....9..a [ :, ~ ], -- : ;;,.:-[ -- - -- -- - - --`- •^ a ._ ~ ;~~ .. xr® ~.~. Tx [,. ©I z®[ '---_ - [ ISi•VSU [ I ~w - ~ - Pr • 97 ~ c I ~~0 ~I IIII~~ , '~ • y • • VIII it •.STRCEI' ]J II ~ „ s - - _ ~ '~ ~I ~a ~ _ ~ _ a _ ~; = a 1i I r;l w >V8` e'n ~~P yB 9 ~ '3 s 'i I~^,yi :' p0 ,n C [ ®~ uO "vlz8 n0 Ily~~ ?) III ,id J. v el Bz y N° e[O . es 9 __ ~___ __ r• [ , 49 . _ __ _ I.I k~ ~~~ 9. ~C~• 7i ~• ~7 r S IO I I''I' I 9b ~ c a •1,a`c s.~, •a _ c ~71I. liil~l y . 4 " Ik ~ 155 IS' ~ ell ~'Y~ I I I ', slnerr xx 1 ro ~ 1 '~ ~ ~ ' _ • .4 a ~ ~ I• ~I a ~I IXw [.X ' I , ( 5 ~ I ~k ,I " p .N. _ u l E •.,. s5 .. 39 xee [ °n® B0 ` :f ' ..z ®s ; .~. ] ~ ° T II ~'-t ~rt'Fr ~~- - t ' I ° I v iI`I I ~~I - Ix yy n I _n ]z i] 3S 66 ~\ 7111 111 I ~ 3. ' I - r _ -~ H ~ ~, ~ pl [ it • IV •~ i ~ I .~ ~, y ~ I.~~Bf~ 8 S jl ~'~ II I ~~I ~5~~ I y LLL L~ ~~-~ ~ i~1 ~ ~[~= ~ ~I III-,1, ~;~ "~ . RANCHO ETIWANDA I LEGENp -• TENTATIVE TRACT NO 14487. 14488 8 15838 PHASE BOUNDARY PgOPOSEO WATER LINE TRACT NO 1419) • LOTS 1-03 TRACT BOUNDARY pgOPOSED STOgM GRAIN LINE TRACT NO 14498 • 1015 1-50 )~ SO HIGHEST RESIDENTIAL LOT NO 'q PROPOSED RRE MDRANT iPALi NO 158]8 • LOTS 1-19 4 q V (1Z SIpE YARp ON 'O PROPOSED STREET LIGHT _ GARAGE SIDE) A A PROaosco DAYUCHT rnL TECHNICAL SITE PLAN -r - l -I- P 1 SLOPE [ 1 GRADING SECTION (SEE SHEET 6j 0.1[ NEnS[p 5[PIEYB[R 3e xOD SEPI[YB[B IB x001 ® PREPLOi FRONT BUILDING PORCH L•J DA[[ [[rISED NN[ 3 x001 xOY[YB[B B ]001 cN9vxm x O PREPLOT REAR BUILDING POgCH - HEIGHT OF RETAINING WALL p9rz mEP9R[D 0[L[YB[R U ia0l 9•+ ~_-`O O DROPPED GARAGE 05 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL• O DRpPPEO GARAGE I 0 _ TOP Of CURB ELEVA-ON •SEE [INOSCPPE PIANS FOR ~•L~ //J~ • CONSigUCTION MATERIAL TYPE mows SSILri ~` 4 OPj I( 11 I -- ,r-- - ;-r - ~•;~ ~., ... I 1. (\I~ PREPARED FOR '~ SGNDARD PALIFI(; HoAffs ~ IYUNO [YnR• Dlr, , n I!s [AST PIMLON S]p[[] !VIII ]M COpOMA CA 93e]9-IJJD LAY N[ I909I J]]-eSCO (son) m!-emo PREPARED BY I y-~J-`L_--~.~ aQ~ LEGEND ~~~~~ PHASE BOUNDARY -•- pROP05E0 WATER LINE SO TRACT ROUNOMT HIGHEST RESIDENTIAL LOi NO -•- 'y PROPOSED SLORM DRNN LINE PROPOSED FIRE HYORAM ® RV (12 510E YARD ON ~O PROPOSED STREET LIGHT GARAGE 510E) PROPOSED DAYLIGHT FILL J. "S-J ® 2 1 SLOPE PREP A A L~ GRADING SECTION (SEE SHEET 6) ® LOT FRONT BUILDING PORCH PREPLOi BEAR BUILDING PORCH - HEIGHT Of RETAINING WALL O DROPPED GARAGE 05 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL• © DROPPED GARAGE 1 0 ~ TOP Of CURB ELEVATION SEE UNOSCAPE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION eUTERIAL TYPE I ~ Ili lil I. ': I ~ I. III /bdi ~~~ II pp [fir 3 AI 1; ~' .. i~ ~, o I, r moa '~l' lil' ill III ilC ul II ..II II ~i I" ql I. y • •II 1y9~ ~1111t III li u Y , IL' •I~, ~, S - r I I: I ~ - "-'J`V 'll iii /r 91 lil3 ', I ' I? ~ +~ iss=, n ~l~ iu i, RANCHO ETIWANDA TENFATNE TRACT NO 14497, 14498 815838 TPACT NO 1119) LOTS I-03 TRACT NO 11198 • LOTS 1-50 IRAGT NO 15838 • LOTS t-19 TECHNICAL SITE PLAN OAI[ Aryl3[0 S[P[[YB[R 3e nODI e[P[[YBER le lODI DA)F REVIS[D JVN[ ! IMI XOY[YB[R [ ]DDI D1iF PREPIRFD OCL[YBER I[//O~~DI SHEET ~ OF l~J u m Z m~ I e Y L ON 133HS 338 ~~iP~ T ~~~,`~ Y y T ~ _ Y ~~ pp 9~ 31 ~6 ~i ~~ .~ \ ~ I ~ i ` ~ IS JP L I~-~ O .~--'~ F I' l P qi e - _ 9 C = u .I x a - Tl r~i' ~ I I o III ¢ II ~ ~ e ~ I g M1r g ll • ~ Ir ~~o - a i yy~g II E~ g R a g l l g .g S [ ~ Q~ ~ ~_ Z F W ~ ~ W 4`^~'F W N s= §~ ^I li - ax: o ' I '?:@ I B " a II ~ ' a F n r_F g~ ~ ~ _R. g 5s~ N 6 t. e ~~'1 p S( p F E3g~ r Y ,., i ~ ,-,~, a f1Fis'_ i,- ei,re s i~Fi~ ~~{ •F gg 3 ~ft~°{ y R ~ m Ei}d Y~~ J as aa 4Y~ti a C~ E : ;,:3~f.i C Ll ON 133H8 338 y @ y e f f i~ ( b T g .. p ~$~ ;~ _ I e ~_ a ` R N P ~~ d ON 1~i6 ~ 8l ON 133HS 336 ~ - - y I_ ~a ~ IeI ~ Ie i 3~ °'°"' f I I Ig~ . al~an L~ 'a ,I Inl a iF}~ I °$~ ~ ~ a •II\.'~ o° IJ'3 lad ) iii&~ ~I ~a .~ ~ ~ ) ~~ ~ ~~~ •~ mm ~ ~~ I la ° I x , I ~ I I r (~ I•i (t I ~ ° ~ ~ - 1 J Y I ~ ,: LJ, a~ I r yy I i I Is •a ~~m I 'I ICI NCI BI I, ~ I• _~' ~ 1 I _l_ I i~ g L_L~J1 ,r~ _ .a 1' ~,~~ - - ~ X31 q IJ ~ I a I W m, h~ 9 I I I v ? I $ O~~ ~ -• i I X •~~j- a ale ~1\' d$ I ~ I' °~"~l -. Y III y~ Ak - I .a I _ _ I ° of T ; I J ` Ai o ~ ee 8 I~ ~-1 • g „r 1113 g))=i I ~ 1K^ 'I (•~ II1 ~'u ft~a ` i' ~ I _ $ ' ~ ~ ill ~~ 2g~g=~- Z' ~V .e ,W,~ ry m~ ~;~; ,li ~ ~ ~ - _ r• .a`o III ~~ 7 ~ g I l y I w I I ~ e iJ.~ ~~ .'s • W ~ Is. ;aI ~a' F ~ I ~~~ L1 ~ ..'F I I ~~ i ' I' R ~~ ~ nl I W '~ i- r ~ ~e L'! ~ ~ / ~~~1 x \\, ~ - M° Ti'*'~ ~• -- g f 113 ~ '8~_ I 19 "~ \ .,~~~ \ '^..; __°_ _mv = 3Ye} cl, 5e „~ IT Lg~ it.aP 'i J, ~~.t~er LU ' = •~ ~ II ~ ~ ~i''~1, II , ~jEa, I - -....-.p.r ~~'..x r i -'iS3tf I ~_ _ / _ ~ ~ -_~ ~ ((~~i @ ~~"~~ ~ " ~ ~$ I. ~ 1~ :I :.~ i c ~ ~ ~ ff~~~gl B ON 133H8 336 L ON 133HS 336 g Y g`~3 ~f~ a ' ' - s o '.' p i ~~ ;~ ~; ~ ~Igl ; P I~i~ ~r i' \ I. ~ ~ i }~^-erg i S ~~4 _~ / v ii ` i I ~ ~ ~ ~. z 9 ~~ ~ G:J-__~.. f t~~. e ~~ .1 I I `~B ON '~^ ~~ g~ ~ pk ~I I rv lay ~ a~` it ~ ~I' ~ ~~ ~~ y.,. rr~; ~ i, ~. ~^I \ ~ I I I ~` ' I' [ ' ~i I - ~~ - ~ mw _ ~ yy£ I I .~ I Y ~ ~.~ I ~y ~ G I ~' I ~ ~IY '~ ~^ k e H I d~ .I i I ~~ I III a ~~ I y~l 1. ~~ ~~ N I gl i I la s Wm I I ~ ~1 ' w '' ~ " ~ it •, 6~3.P IT j' II I I I ( I (A • wm ~ ~ i~ I / ~ ii ~ ~ ~ ; `k• e I ~ 9 I I I I ~ _~ •~ v ry ~.a 9e ~ e I R I x~ ,o a ~' ~ .:. t _ ~~ i illy ; ,' ,/~ ~~ -"~•~ I ~~ W - ,~I ~ ~~ ,: ~ _, -~,ra ~~.~ .nom; ~ - 18 Vii, ~ ~~ _ `I; ~ / i,..~ ~„ - 'I II^< x~ ~~ g;~ I'~ i~ ~,~ ~ I ~ ~ l i ~ ~ ~ ~' I ~ 1BVHL °~ yG ^ye III ~~ I I I~ ~ , \g mPareL~ ~ Zj ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ I ~ j i I I ~ ~}6A e 1 ~I E~ I s ~~ ~ el c YI~E~. i I~ i ~ ,\ `14 i cl I , I III i._ / t.,~~~ ~ _~~ s HK ~~I'I i.. .:. a= Ix I ., /d ~ __ ~ ~ I ~ ; ~ 3 I~ ~. t1 eke ~ I'' I~:a ' P" ~ ill I e l i~ 77 ~. w a~ s j( ~ `l a` ~ / ~• a: ~ I I hli i~ ~ ~ ifi_ y:, ~ Ri i I _ C ~ I I _ Y ~ ~, S I L ay Sq ~' \ m~ ~aii ~ lad $ +' ve f ' ,I I ~ R [~ ~~ w ~ a0 '! D# ' ,'~kk ~~~" a `~"' ~ Ixl ;~'- I" 6,8p ~~~~~ ~ ~ I ~ ~'_, ~ - ~ a;Mle i - -- - -- - _ --- - - -. -~~ `I ~ ' ~. t ~ f ??~'~•' ` I li ~ - _Wl6 _^-_- - _ va - a f46is~ ~ ?.•:PI _Y. S i ~ -.-_ ~.. T-- -4._- l B ON 133HS 33S ~ _ gg x a .a ~ R ~ Y`~`; 3 ~ ~ E~,~i `/a ppg`a n • I 0 2 f w m w w N A E ~~ E6 it,i ~ ` s s° #^. aY8 .~ ay g8 $ 5~ ~ ~gY: '~[ l~.je r5 # r 1=~~; _- e @ x e j}~(?° S ItSft3 a yg ?_.... pE*~ y~yf'a~ dg~~'~ [ggaf y lee ~ ~~~;; st Y 6 a 5a~_e.r Vg Sl ON 133HS 336 9 3't. Y®N 3YL I6NN M1Ht3 I 940UHg3 fIMFM \~Ji i ~ ~~ ~n -A p b! ~~~d ~N 1 L ,I ~ I``$ ~ w ~ ~ ~ m Y I~ ~ ~~ B ' ~91 Ii rt µµ~~ , 'L ~ n II a. ~ I I mo ~~ r a I h ~ ~ I I i 't'Y' _ {~. I a I ,a I A~ . $ rv~ iil~ 7 B 8 / ml~ Is~ ~ ~BI ~ n 0.~ -~ a CE g~y~ ~ u~ Irl 4I 1 u II ~~e ~ ~ L~ ' m~ _ !JI~ ~ ~ n ~„ ~l -}T ~11 ~ 1E~YpY03 _ I I ~~ __ ~_ty~IV .LTVV~w~93l1H r ~ ,~.~ 3 tc ' { ~j'\ I C m~ g~ ~e~ ~~ ji ~ I o°~"~` rtw~- ~'Li~~ ~ I Y ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ If! ~~ U ' i ~ 7 ~ IS _ ~'v~,W, rN. ~~, A _ ~ I ~:4 ~ \, per ~~c~ ~ma .;ice ~~ ~ ~I c1 S~ I' •/ \ \ • \ I III I I ~ b~ m ~ ~ 1 I I L ' ry I'I t ' e eeL a' ~ j I ^~ 1 ~J' I 4 ~ 1 I ` LLJJ ~ ~ i xrp ~,...~..>~~ ,, ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ Ire ~ -~ ~ ~ .. I .i~,-~~II ¢L ~ I 'gym ~~ -ez ~ ~z ~ s I ~ I8 ~ l ~ ~~ ~ L ~ I 1 I ~ I ~ ~ I i e '~. ~, e I ~ 6'1 n j'p~ " y IB i r ~ i i-- ~ I' '~ s, I - s _~ ~' ~ ~-grll~~a ~ li I _ ____ _ .-rh T ~ ~~ ~ ~ -gr ~~ ~ I ~ I rl -~ ~ ` --- - l° ~U I A ~ ~ m- ~ ~ .~_ .adr _ -~~ \- 8 _--e4 i 3 £9 I lp ~+ g II i ~_ I _ I j U ()NA ~~ ']1CW NIHg3 1 ~I ~V I F~ `fin<\ _~ ~ I g~ z ~~ ~ F.`y ~ I '~ F3 u P & ~i Z Ig '~ ~ °~ ~e ~: I C 1 ~ s ~ w ^' ~' I ~a i g ~ '~~19..~li~~ 3 1 ~ aI S µl a~ 91e ~I bJ ~, I" o Ie I `I"ad N I. I I ~ i'_ I I ~ .D ~~~ INI a IB~~ ~ - S I~\, °. 6 Fjlg\ y~y;`'w~ ~ ~ {Ltig i I o ~Y8 ~se$ >< 5~. ogY: lg f' g .Fe. e y s.g , Y~~ig R4 g ~ a ~ j 4~5g ~gi: r 3 a t ~~ ~5 . yp. lg F% .~e° x ag •t.g 4 ~-F.:.~ GRADING SECTIONS - -~ [ I e _ w s . a°ws m 1 , .,,~. I - -- F [r~,:~ Frees - - ,.. SJ J .-. BECTION A' • BECTION n-B' BECTIOM C'=C SECTION E E'~~~ m BECTNJN'D-D' m =i .i''= -. _~~'_` BECTION F=F I .~v, Lre~ ,A 4 ~i'.' BECTION 1C-TC L_ .L ~~ e 4rG SECTION'O'-b •~ Io _~~[ sECnoN T.•t • ~o:c i [ .... I,re,: - 4tvC M Nd9 ~M • 1 w aaennu..•..• ~~ m BECnON T T ., N.... ~~ „ t~ BECTION Y-Y aecT%'o'.a TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS Sn,Rw Av[xc ,r_r,,T.r.li~~i SA]cDRAre •]931E ._. BECIION N N SECTION J-J' BECTN)N Y Y PREPARED FOR ~ISFAr.IDpRD PACIFlC HOntes ,E IxuxR [Nn.. D,nnox ^ ~,.~ ~.~ 35] C.31 RINCDN SIREEI SVV[ IPo ~_ - CORONI C. 93U]9-1]30 L f.Y HC (909) 3]1-ESCO ~.„. .. Uwl v3-ero PREPARED RY .. Q ,.. m Nom.: ~ ~,]~ ..®'-~ °'~ : ti ~Wli'IilYi~~ RANCHO ETIWANDA TENTATIVE TRACT NO 14497, 14498 8 !5838 TRACT NO 1119) • LOTS 1-50 TRACT NO U19B LOTS 3-)3 TRACT NO 15939 • LOTS 1-19 a3T R[mm s[rrtn[R ze zoRsECT~IONS ar[ .ms[o ]uN[ s :ooi Nov[Na. [ xoo~ o.r[ rR[r.ao- o[aNU. I. zoR3 f[vr3cu3 m ww - Mv9an eraffrrtay oe uc srmrs m Nr .r rtmu o r xr C m Nr a • I•r fivNCA3] m RM' N]gp1 oars w r • wala a v aECTIOM B=9' ~' .• a u m SHEET V OF h_ a.s••oo e.uoo....,.or..o.. =~ 1 _ I ~-I- - _ - - 1 p i ~, i, ~, I FAMRY ROOM ~ I V'NM I MASTER BEDROOM \l' IB'J %1/'iP II II XI 1TdX11$ II _I I 6 \\v S t I I I '45-- ___ ~ ~- OIMNG flM LMNG flM - 1 .. ~ N001I 1O-0'%11'$ 17$%14'-B' {s Q j 14'8'%ID$-' ~ * STER BA ~ r ,._ T ~ i J ~ ~ f~ ti sxs_.~ a KRCNEN ENTRY .n ~ -- ~ :~ WALK IN ~. I ___ ~• SERVICE ~ OM1 C: fi I. - ~~»- eeofloornz 1 m$zlr$ 1 1 BEOROOMI GARAGE 11'P%13'B' 1 21'-10'%474' F RV f.01 T BEDROOM 3 iG$xIw ~ DESIGN REV~W STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES 255E RPICON STREET, SLATE 200 CORONA, CA 92879-1330 _•• - , GAMGE 1 IB-0'zlaa sr 1_ .._ I NEI(}~ORHOOD 4 TRAC # 14497, 14498 & iS838 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALffORMA illlllll Ilinlllll Ilil I Inl Iln momx mTE~ v mol PLAN ONE - A - SPANLSH a ~, ^__ - 9, I VI~ Ur ' WILLIAM H E M A LHAICH A R C M I T E C T G I N C mnwxwxw wrt.w mxu nRm wmmr ...wVra~ rw>s lse h „4 ~ DESIGN REV~W ~~ <,~ w FEFppp 1 TRACT / 14497, 14498 &15838 STANDARD PACffIC HOMES 255 E RPICON STREET, SUITE 200 CORONA, CA 92879-1330 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALffORMA Inunullunlnulnunnlt ~~ Y i~ PLAN ONE -FRONT ELEVATIONS nr~- z WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH A R C H I i E C i S I N C mmwlwrw aiRa mxu pyy~0 M }A lmi M~tlYfs, Y~ i • ~ ,i~~ \~ ~.._ ~,~ _; _~. LEFT REAR NEIGHBORHOOD 4 ~ DESIGN REVIEW TRACT 8 14497, 14498 & 15838 PLAN ONE -A- SPANISH STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA rl(''~ 255E RPICON STREET, SUTE 200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALffORMA J~ CORONA, CA 92879-1330 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH IIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIII IIII IIIII ARC M 1 I E C 1 5 1 N C moos: Imf.anwlw asrtrol Ilv,r~u veum UMIMV 35 Spl M ffi ®I wapk[hmn In W ib IID er_ ® ..mxy_ " C9K'v:-' ., I r_axg . M_~ _ __ N - ~ °- kA y ~- LEFT °C 1 , ~, , ®„ y ~In - - lli iilf brtdl i.. o DESIGN REVRW STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES 255 E RWCON STREET, SUITE 200 CORONA, CA 92879-1330 ~® ~~IT NEIGHBORHOOD 4 TRACT - 14497, 14498 & 15838 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALffORMA Ininmlbuumlhinnutl ]OODil 5@]001 FRONT REAR as ~. Ck~ it cc- PLAN ONE -B- TRADITIONAL n~~~ 4 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCN A R C H I T E C L S I N C IRIS WIYNYW BllFtll M1FG ml~® MIDmll ~Mifm, d~ i. o ~ BEDROOM 2 136 %13'2 BEDgO9M 3 13 fi'%13 Y VESTIBULE \ ~ I BATN2 TECH CENIEq d r1 ~ 6 0 _ _ N-6 f D1 1 i~ 1• 'f 1 Gti 1 •~ MASTEq BATH O • MAS1Eq BEDROOM ~ ~ O 1A 6 %1B 6 12 Y• %B 4 a~ NOCNEN fMAILY ROOM 14 YX1T B' i ~ O WALX~R! ~. VESTIBULE ~ .,. __ 1 T I TANDEM OPT HOBBY BM 11 open to below 1 I. --' - BONUS ROOM' D9lING ROOM LMNG BOOM OPDONAL LOFT 1 13' 8 %17 14 14 2 % 12 B 1314%1Ofi 1 -. .. ~., Y -. -. g% ENFBY PoRCM '9 .. m.... ....e- __- NEIGHBORHOOD 4 ~ DESIGN REVIEW TRACT A 14497, 14498 & 15838 STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA 255E RINCON STREET, SUITE 200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALffORMA CORONA, CA 92879-1330 luullnllnnllulllnlllul XMI~i3 mn• ~ 2 CAR GARAGE FlRST FLOOq 2910 B F SECOND FLOOR 910 S f TOTAL 2999 S F GARAGE SOBS F PLAN TWC) -E- COUNTRY ~~~ 6 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH A R C H I L E C T 6 I N C ITI WIRVeIW OInf NI IMEG f64p.Y enmLen mw~tlilm~ 4b2V 1>8 • s COUNTRY ~J __.._.__.... RANCH DESIGN REV~W TRACT t M49& 15838 o PLAN TWO -FRONT ELEVATIONS STANDARD PACffiC HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA n(~- ° 255 E RQJCON STREET, SUfTE 200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALffORNIA V1%1 ~ CORONA, CA 92879-1330 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH 6unnnlumRli6imm~l A R C X I T E C T S I N C srrt~exO9i mi wpm ~~ rreo s I 1 ~ 'I I ,'LP~. Ii II ~I,~I. I~ ~~ti ~ ~ ~1: ~: ~_ ~- 'I ._ LEFT ~ o~ N Le S1. ~ DESIGN REVIEW RIGHT NEIGHBORHOOD 4 TRACT f 14497, 14498 & 15838 STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES 25S E RPICON STREET, SUITE 200 CORONA, CA 92879-1330 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALffORMA Inunmbilunuhnnmtl ]NM] W1)ARY b ]COI REAR PLAN TWO -E- COUNTRY WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH A R C H I i E C i 5 I N C 11(ANN •MYW 91IF101 M1EG 1]I,CI M Dl ®I w~NMmn h,N20~9 i 1` ~e- ~~ • CY.~ Sd' ~yy. tlA'k~ _~_ "; -~ F;~ °° FRONT REAR NEI(d-BORHOOD 4 ~ DESIGN REVIEW TRACT a 14497, 74498 & 15838 PLAN TWO -C- BUNGALOW „ ^__ o STANDARD PACffIC HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA 11/u,/%,¢ q 255E RPlCON STREET, SUITE 200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALEORMA CORONA, CA 92879-1330 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCM IIII IIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ARCHITECT 5 I N C l0ppg3 IRIIYlNII.VWM 6NIFW qN(G NiTQ1 SARAIBEP V 3001 11i YAM ~ww~tlifm, tiMMl9 • \ LEFT \ RIGHT RIGHT ~1 ~ REVEW TRACT~M49C7R,F1~44~ &15838 PLAN TW( STAImARD PACFIC HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA 255 E RNCON STREET, SUfTE 200 CORONA, CA. 92879-1330 RANCEp CUCAMONGA, CALFCdtMA IwnunlmmnOnnnml WILLwM ARCH I OP1.019YY11 Msi -D- RANQi ZMALHALCM CTS 1 N C gas o~ e~ P zu~g J= A 3 '' ~~~ ua =W~ ~~~t jU g 3 (~! g~ ~ ~ '__- W~~ _~# Z Z~ CC ~p f~ N a ~°' ~~ W N ~U 0 ~-a~ 3~ ~~ ~€ Y3 <.~ ~G o~ g~ a~ 3~ _~ Z~ ce xu j2~A i a~ (:~~ ,r~,ut x:~ ~_~ (u 1 3~4a 3<~s ~i~ ~~ ~~ a yP o~ ~u ~~t~ !W~p N ~V ~~ • • ~~ .~ ~G J o~ Iu~9 ~Z A ~ 3= Fyy)Je ~~w if ~I~~ 3~€A 3<€s g~ 3 u _`__ ~ W~. _~tl c U G -= Q oe ~~ i~ m N /d NP S ~< WoZ N h ~V ~~ / v ~a~ n~ O .~ .n G =uq~ UZ ~ I~W a~ =1~ ~~ 4~_~ JV J=Qe 3<~s ~~ ~ ~~:"_~~ ~~'._ ~~ oe ~ ~~ d ~P ~~ ~~~ ~~~ 0 -"1 ----- -------------- --- ® ® - -® DESIC,1~1 REV~W O ~- Lffr NEIQ-BORHOOD 4 TRACT !14497, 14498 & L5838 STANDARD PACffIC HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA 255 E RNCON STREET, SUfTE Z00 RANCHO CUCAMCNJGA, CALFORNIA CORONA, CA. 92879-1330 Iunnwilonuuinnnml mom LAWNY D m01 carrirrivf PLAN TWO -OPTIONAL EXTEtmED FRONT PORCH WILLIAM HEZMALMALCM A R C N I T E C T 9 I N C nmwlLwvl urta miEa wm M 7!® itlba YM7a 10 O u 3 ~t3D O~ xu 9 i ~ UZ~A =-Sz O ~ ~ aU~ ~ :~~ ~~¢~ 3<~~ ~_~ oZ F 1 3 F '°~' ~~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ $ •- 3<=~ ~ ~ : c d a ~ ° ~ ~._ ~ ~ U Z~ Q cc m ~~ S~ R 2 ~ ~~ >» a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m h ~V 0 n LJ -- - ------------------ 1~ ~ 1~ nA R =__________~~~ ~ DESIC~J REV~W ~~ COUNTRY-E N~0~6pRHOOD 4 PLAN TWO -OPTIONAL EXTENDm FRONT PORCH TRACT f 14497, 14498 & 15838 WRF~I ~~~ STANDARD PACffIC HOMES us E RracoN sTRFEr, sorts zoo CORONA, CA. 92879-1330 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNU lunnnduunntlmunnl >ewul WU.4Y ZL lOM WILLIAM HEZMALHALCM A R C N I i E C 7 3 I N C I111l1dFYLLW YRb wnEU su0 MmW MItlO YMS19 0 D BUNGALOW-C c REVEW NEK}~ORIi00D 4 TRACT i 14497, M498 &15838 STANDARD PAOFIC HOMES 255 E RNCON STREET, SUfTE 200 CORONA, CA. 92879-1330 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO QJCAMONGA, CALFORNIA Inuum6mmnlnnnnll EOMl ~Id~ R %q RANCH-0 PLAN TWO -OPTIONAL EXTENDED WfOfHM pOPT~IOt~LS WILLWM HEZMALNALCH A R C N I T E C T 9 I N C OR'q [YYYI Mq AIEd wMw M)a® w~YYw yMalp a to i • ~ ~ . o~ =o~® r~ ~z p c`J~~~ ~atXS I 3' ~e ~ a N ~- ~e 3<gi I ~m ~ i ~ ~ --- ~R N ! - V b ~¢ \ N ~ a y i ~ r----__----_ \ 0 n i ', I e--~---- -' - ----- i - V-L--- ----- - ' ~" 5 ~ e ~~ ~= . bn g ~ _ ~~W a'b ~U _ c 3 C ( f-a ~YC1SF~ OP W oOZ •-_~ C - -, ._ ~9 ~- '--~-- -- ---~- • - ------- -~- ~ ~ O U ~ .•_ ~~ Z © ~~ - ® ~ OC ~ a~- ~ I ': ~ N ,; I g4 y 1 a x !Y 'I F II t ' ® ~ 1 ~ 4 ~ ~ ~' o b ~ ~ I ~4 i s s Y .. © ~ Q i I Xi an - - ~ ~o d ~ a~P ~ ~ ~u W ~ ~~ h ~U ~~3 D ON {~2! r/r~ ~ ~~g~ jZ A ~F~~ Upp II. i~ ~_~ 3~~A 3(~! • ~D ~ W S D~~ d a ~~ ~~ ~~ W h ~~ a ~E~ ., ~~~ _ ~~~ t n d.~- ~'---~---- 1- --e,.- ~ ~ _ _1 ~y_ w_ 1 I ~___ __- ______ _~ _ __v,~~ ~<_~ ~~ __ ~~ -2CW_ ~~~ FROM (~ o DESKTI REV~W J ~ ~-_ EpOHT recrsOREaoo a tRACr ~ ua9~, uava s ue~a - --- - _~ ____ --~ =-y _~ PLAN TF6tFF -A- STANDARD PAC~1C HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA ~ ° 21 255 E RNCON STREET, SLATE 200 RANO10 CUCAMONGA, CAIFOR~dA CORONA, CA. 92079-U30 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCN IIIIIOIIIIIIpIIIIIIIIpppll A R C H I T E C T S I N C ~l M7a ~IL~iwMtl~ Ypm 8 s~rt~ a am ~~ II I II ~ I I I I g I SW II II ~~ I I I 12 I I I I II I I II I ~~ eq~ 3 y~ 3 G ,~ fl~ ZU J= B I 3! JF ~~ V( ~«~~ ~~~E 3~ 3<~i a ~~ •_ W ~ ~._ •._ ~ ~~ d ~~ a W ~ ~~ ~ N ~V ~_a~~a r1 /I"~~ fi II I) II I I V-J II 11 u I II II II 11 II I II II II II II 11 II B II II II II o~ 3 o =~~~ UZ_ A a= NU ~, ~ ~~': ~~ Y ~=1 J~Qg 3<~! a °$ _ ~~:-_~~ ~~ o ~ ~ __ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ d~ ~ ~~ ~~ W N h ~U a X38 ~~l i i ii i i i i i i i i i ~ ~~ i '~ i i i ii ~ ii ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 9S 1 Qd ~G OO N J ~F ua I.~ ~i~ 3~Qp 3<~! g U ._ W U_ ~~ oC ~~ d ~~ ~ °' ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~i~ ~~4~ o~ ~, ~~ ~~ w~ e~ G Iu~g Jz A I vrea `Ff, ua ~:~ ~_~ <u i 3~Qa 3<ffs laff g~ . ~ ~ -~~ o~ ~~ ce ~~ ~o a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ff X39 ----~- sr .~~ O UE$ICdd REyEyy TRACT *7,~144984& 15838 ~ ~~ ~~ STAImARD PACFIC HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA ~(~1}- ° 255 E RNCON STREET, SUrtE 200 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALFORNU V1~11 26 CORONA, CA. 92879-1330 WIWAM HEZnnALHALCH IIIIRIIIIIIIIIRIVIIIRIIIRI A R C N I T E C T S I N C mpy2 IIOfgIF.V~IM Ylltl A~l4 0M0 M 7a® wwlb~ YM7>10 9IfA~ R~ ~~/ oN ZU~§ V2 A W° ~F~' ~ _.~~ ~ ~_~ ~~¢~ 3<~i ..~ G ~i c7 ~~' X66 U~ ~~ d ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~M\ ~W oNN 0110 YJlMII N1Y~ IdWY1MW1 O N I S I 0 3 l I H J L V I+~ivl-nvwz~ wvmlM 8Z 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII vriao~v~ •v~owvxU owNVa VaNVMLL3 OHJNV21 OEfl;6LBZ6 'V~'VNONO~ OOZ 31Y5 Imlc NO7NM 3 SSZ S3WOH JI.~JVd m1VQJVIS FD210d 1NO~Li ~IILX3 IVNOLLdO - 33a-LL WVId ecest ~ es~~~ • ~vai 0 O-MOIVOlY19 ~n $ ~~ ~~ s~ 0 ~% ti ~b ~ti O ~j 03 =u g ~ ~=~a S= 1 ~~~~A U m ~We x~~ Y f=~ <~ , ~ 3<€: 4 b ~2~4 ~x ~M w~ ~ ~~~ -~-' ~~ g °'° ~ u 3~. ~ v W ~ o ' ~~ • U G •-_ ~ Z ~ ~ m b. o 1 f¢~ r ~ 4 ~~ I' ~~ o~ ~1 ... -~ ~ ® o --------- ~{ o ~~~,,,~,,, A-a :; 1 1 3 ~ a~, 1 ___,_____ 1 ~ _ ~; ,~ ~I _ ! ~ ~~ ryN ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~m 1 ~^ § ~ ~ ~a ~~ f~~3 ~ ~~ fl ~~' n =~~o ~_ ^ ` i-a! mWj : ~~ ~~~~~ F=~ ~ ~~Q, i ~<~~ ~~ q / ~ ~g ..~ b a ~~. o =~~ • ~ ~ -= ~ ~ g ~~ ~P ~ ~~ W~ Nqp( h ~V r~ U ~~ „ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~i/ i -. G _a .~ P G ~I o ~, =ug9 J=8a a= s <:~ u _:~~ f=~f ~~ ¢f 3<~i gQ~ Z~ , 3` ~ W O . _~A O s~ U" ._ <~ cc ~~ d ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ N ~~ oM ® I I ~ I I II ~ I II I II I II I II ~a ~~~ I II I II I Ir"~ I I I ~~~~'''~~~~~~~~ I I I II I II I II I II I II I II { I II I II I II I II ~~ ~~ II II II II I . II it II II O I II II II II II I II II II II II it II 3 0 Y e~ P G WW _.~ ~_~ <U 3~Da 3<~: g F ~ :'~ 0~.._a~ U~ z~ oac $ ~~ d ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ a i U I II I I I I I I II - I II I II I ~ II~ I 11 I II 1 II I II II I II i i~ J E II III B II II II B II II II 11 F„C II II II I u II II II u II II II II II II I II ~I~C I I I I O M =u~® ~z A g ~ ~ =-a! ' <:~ ~ H~a =:~a ~~~ O J y. Q 3<ffe r ~~ ~~ P y~ r ~~ ~~. ~ ~ =~~ 2~'.. Z Q 1 ~~ r~riP C~~ d P ~a ~~ ~~ Nqp~ h ~V O ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ - - C NBO~BORHOOD 4 TRACT f M497, iM98 & L583B FHON~ PLAN STANDARD PAOFIC HOMES us a RricoN sTRffr, surre zoo CORONA, CA. 92879-U30 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO GUCAMONGA, CALFORNIA Iunuutlnnuminuun4 mt~ IwWY n, IDm o ~~ WILLIAM HEZA'1ALHALCH A R C N I T E C T S I N C Imwlarr una rhea auo aa® ~rs0 raa,a Ir~ LJ o~ ® a ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~8 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~ ~, ~~ ,~ ~~ i® ii ii ~ i ~~ ii i u i ~t ~-~9 ~ 3 ~~..~ Y ~_~ 3<~: `u a'b ~~_ ~~::_~~ ~ _° ~ -= ~ Z ~< g ~~ ~ ~ d a ~~ W~ app: N ~V 0 V 0 .~ ~ ~ ~~, REVEW Lffr t•!O(i'BORF100D 4 TRACT f 14497, 14498 6 L5838 STANDARD PACFlC HOMES 255 E RNCON STREET, SURE Z00 CC42CINA, CA. 92879-1330 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CMFORNA InnnuOnnnnOnnnud rnam~ ~ PLAN FOUR -D- wmi c WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH A R C N I T E C T S I N C IINIVMYW URM IIMEG MOO ~Yyyf® y0~ 0 36 OM Fi~~ 3<~! s ~~ (<<7 -= U : =qd a 0O -1[~~ G z ~ •= ~ oe g~ ~a ~~ ~~ ~~ 0 ~~ L °d3 ~ 17 ~ 'I I~ ~~ ~ II 1 ~ i I I ~ ~ ~~ ~~ i ~~ I ~ I ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~~ ~ II 0.- ~ ~~ ~ II I~ ~~ ~ II ~ II .. ~ ~~ 1 ~~ I ~~ . .. ~ ~~ ~~ o0 ~5a o~ _ ~ $ d ~S i~~~ ~z A YYSf C. i' F~I~ ~ug® ~<~! `~ g ~ .~ a _ ._ ~ 3~ _~~ F :'- p m Wa• _q>. S ~. U ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ a F~ ~ ~~ ~~ Npp( N ~V 0 01QM~ ~r IsCM 011Y qi~W AIY~ WMIIOtbY J N I S 1 J 3 1 1 H~ a V N»vM~vwzaH wvn~l/IIl 6£ 0 1NOY~ 1X3 - NV1d ~~~ N~ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIYIIII vr~ao~vJ 'vx~owvJrn otoNVa dNJVMLL3 OHJNV~! BEBSI R 86461 '[6441 / 1JV1LL 4 OOOHLOS~p9~ OEEt; 6LBZ6 VJ 'VNOMOJ OOZ 31Y1S .L~M1S NOJML 3 SSL S3WOH JLiJVd U~IV~IVIS 0 /H~~ v ) O-MOlVON18 1 Q ~ ~ `~ ~ ~ s u ~b 4 4 ' '~ M ~ I11 ~F b H g~ a74 N ~a a~ } z~ JZ b! :~~ v ~oa .1, T s:~~ II F~~ ~u ® ~ 3<~s ~~ 0 _ _ § _ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~--: =~=~,. ~ W OS~~: U u -' G {. ^ a ~ I----- ~ of ti ~ 1 ®®II N ~ i Hti ~ ~ '_~i 1 ~Y I f ~ ~~ i i T ~ i y ~ ~ ~ ^ i ' --------~-~ ~ a ~a ~ ~~ ~~~• ~~ ~~ o u .~ G 0 U ~i~ o~ _~ 4 UZ ~A <- ! ia~,• ~u Wwa x.~ ~~~ 3a~a 3<~: ~~ b, ~~_._~~ o -~ U ~ ~- a~ ~~ d ~~ d~ h ~~ 6~ DESIGN REVEVN O rya soRHOOD a TRACT f 14497, 14498 815938 STANDARD PACFIC HOMES us a Rr1coN sTR~T, sure zoo CORCINA, CA 92879-1330 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALFORNIA Innlullunnul 1~ FaoNr ___ ___ __= F~~--- _ ~ ~ ~ ~ PLAN FlVE -A- SPANLSH WILLIAM FIEZINAL ARCHITECT S .1Ol1GawW tlleS. Rrl! MOWI /~Qba 1 0 42 s s s ---~ -~ -- -- -------------~_ ------ -=y -- _,~ . ~___ -- FaoHT NEIO~BORHOOD 4 ___ ~B- i~ ~ ~ ~:i FEAR o DESIGN REV~W rRACr ~ wavy, wave a us3e PLAN FIVE -E- COUNTRY ~ STANDARD PACEIC HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA (~(yl}- 43 255 E RNCON STREET, surf 200 RANChio CUCAMONGA, CntFORrmn VI%1 C(a~(~aA. ~' 92879-ti30 WILLIAM FIE2MALHALCH Ilillllllllllllllllllllllllllll ARCNITECTS INC IDYpI I]IIIWYINWII plFp GSfG 0Np1 Mbli1 ~~Ctlm VMb.p -------------- ------- ~ =__ ~ =0== ~ __-- __ --- -------- -------o --o - ~ 0 ~_ o DESIGN REVEW STANDARD PACEIC HOMES us E Rr~coN srn~r, surtE zoo CCNtONA, CA. 9287~I330 ~~~ b,s~ rnV1~ I PLAN FIVE -I)- aentr^u RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAIFORNA Inunmhnnuuluunntl XRRfI 9RA®6 ]al o V1n 44 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCN ARCHITECTS I N C ON'N4YYY1 URp M~EG 0N0 rear r.war rralp ~ ~ s __ --- -- -- ~~~~ d DESK~J REVEW PIDO'BORfI00D 4 TRACT f 14497, 14498 615838 STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES RANCHO ETIWANDA 255 E RNCON STRFET, SUiE 200 RANC}l0 QICAMONGA, CALffC4iMA CORC4JA, CA 92879-1330 InnnwlnnunOnnunR NNWY ]1, AW ~~ -•=•-- REAR PLAN FIVE -A- SPANISH WffH OPTIONS ~, ^-_ o 1'~V,ur,.'~" 45 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH A R C H I T E C T S I N C mmwlwaw urta imEU sum M iJ® ~~ YM>1g ~ ~ ~ ~' ryir --,. $ rl ~ .I ~i i~ ~ I I I p I ® l I I I II II I ~I I I I ® II I II II I _ I ® I I I~ I I I _ ® I I ® ®® ' I II I I I II L~vt I 14, I I! B 8 ,~ i 6 a 9 l'I l I I I I I II I I I _ I 1 I 1 1 1 II II I II® I II I II - I II \ I 11 i I II® 1 I II 1 I II I ® II 1 II® II I II I II I II I II I II 1 II I II I II I II I II I II I II II I II I I II I ~W v ¢~a ~ ~F o$ ~~ ggrd g~' ~i <~ 3~ 3c g . Q 3~:.~ z°~ ._ z Q CC OC 1 ~e P p~rFf(m Qd NryP p( ~U ~~ Nqp~ H e~U a~ ~~ ' I I I I I I I I II II I II ~ I II~ 1 I II I II I I1~ I II 1 II I~ II I II~ I II I 11 ' ;~ ,~ I I II 1 ~ Iu~4 ~x A II ~a~~ II II ~ ~ ~Wa~ ^ II x.~ ii ~ ~x~ <u 1 3~4a 3<~~ II u u II II u ® 'I I II II II II ® II u I I II I ~a ~~ ~ ~ :.' ~ ~~ _ ~ -=~ I~ G v I fi 0 ; ~~ ~~ I II I II I I II I I II I I ~~ II I I II I 1 II 1 I II I 1 II I I II I I II I 1 ~ ~~ I II O I 1 I I , I 1 I 2 I R I 1 a I ~a ~~ 1 I I I ~ W~ 4,~ dl ! ~~~JJJ nl^ / a ^~ `1~ ~C JJ =u~9 ? p ~ ^ i a= ~uia ~~: ~~ ~ ~~~ ~u4~ p fk 3<€s ~(oa _ ~ _ ~ ~ . '~ _ ~ =~~ a v ~~ d ~~ ~~j ~~ !W~qp~ i~/1 iJU W s DESIGN REVEW a L~ LEFT PEJ0810RFiOOD 4 TRACT ~ 14497, M498 &15838 STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES 255 E RNCON STREET, SUffE 200 CORONA, CA. 92879-1330 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CAUFORNA Innnu0mnlROnnnntl llOgl NN/NY ;8101 rnam 1 RANCH - D rn~nl COUNTRY - E PLAN FIVE -OPTIONAL EXTENDED FRONT PORCHES WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS I N C IIPINYI(YW1 4Rq M1EG 0Y0 M pI WI Mb0 YM>m lq 0 49 L~ ~~ ~~ ~~ CW ~~ _~ ~4 L~ ~~ F, r <,, ~P ~P G ~i~ a~ ~t~A i a~ ~~~ ~~: ~:~ F~~E 3~~a 3<~~ ~.J a <~, 3 ~ ~._~" ~ oy~ =~ VG.•= ~~ ~~ d ~ yP a ~S£~ < Y~ V N rp~ N ~V _ _ ~.~, r :~.. IwwO \.p~. C.wsl ~l~I.m.6V „I~, O. DESIGN a rroa4soRNOO~ a TRACT 114497, W498 &15838 coNCFanlal SCENES 0 STANDARD PACFIC HOMES 255 E RNCCMV STREET, SUfTE 200 CORONA, CA. 92079-1330 RANCHO ETIWANDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALFCW,MA Inuumlinnnillunnntl SVR9I V1L1 WIWAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS I N C IIMtUXfIIWII tllEp rtlEfA au0 MAiI ~w.,\0\~u \MEp I® DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Doug Fenn January 15, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00317 -STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES -The design review of budding elevations and detailed site plan for three previously approved tentative tract maps consisting of 172 single-family lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan m the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development, located on Day Creek Boulevard on the north and south sides of Banyan Street- APN: 225-101-31,45 and apportion 43 UCP/RANCHO ETIWANDA. Related fde• Tract(s) 14497, 14498, and 15838. Desion Parameters: The site falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously Umvers~ty/Crest Project), a 1,238 residential unit development approved bythe County in May 1991 and recently annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The site consists of 7 Tracts, which are all currently being rough graded. The applicant is proposing a total of 8 phases. The site is bordered by vacant land and Wilson Avenue to the north; existing single-family residential development to the west, to the south is vacant land for a future park site and an existing elementary school, and Tracts 14494, 14523 and 14495 to the east. Main access to the tracts is from Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue. The applicant ~s proposing to develop 172 single-family homes on three tracts approved under the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development Agreement (Tract 14497,14498 and 15838). The homes will include 10 Floor Plans and 5 architectural styles. The square footage of the homes range m size from 2,507 to 3,334 square feet. The architectural styles of the protect include Ranch, Country, Bungalow, and Spanish. The homes will also include porches on comer lots, side on garages, and additional enhanced architecture on elevations, which back and side on Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue. The protect will be built m 10 phases. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an ouUme for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee d~scuss~on regarding this protect: The applicant has worked diligently with staff to resolve major design issues. Secondary Issues• Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time pennittmg, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. The Country plan should be reflected more of the detail elements that are described on Exhibit "19" of the University Planned Development agreement (see Exhibit °A°). 2. Fifty percent of garage doors should have windows. This will allow variety of 3 car garage elevations. 3. When a retaining wall exists m the rear of the properly to assist with the 15-foot useable areas, steps should be provided to allow access to maintain the slope. 4. The plasters used for the Bungalow style architecture should widen at the bottom for a more rural and traditional look. /7"~ ~P ~~N~t~ DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00317-STANDARD PACIFIC January 15, 2002 Page 2 Chimneys should have architectural detail, including bock, stone, or siding as shown in the adopted architectural guidelines for Rancho Etiwanda. Adding stone to the Bungalow or bock to the Country style would be in the spurt of the development agreement. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion: All walls visible from or facing a street should be decorative masonry on both sides. All intenor pnvate yard slopes required to be landscaped should receive ground cover, shrubs, and one tree for every 150 square feet of area. A ratio of fifty percent 5-gallon and fifty peroent 15-gallon shalt be provided for trees. 3. All over rock should be authentic and not veneer. 4. Plot one tree in each front yard area on Landscape Plan. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the protect subject to the above-mentioned conditions. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Douglas Fenn In response to staffs secondary items the Committee recommended that the applicant incorporate the following: Additional exposed rafter tads should be added to the front and rear elevations on the Country plan 'two.' The rafter tads for the rear elevation are to be incorporated on the hip portion of the elevations. 2. Additional rafter tads are needed on Plan °five° and the round detail on the front should be squared. 3. Fifty percent of garage doors should have windows. This will allow vanety of car garage elevations. 4. Fifty percent of the two-story houses should have porches along Day Creek Boulevard that will be visible from the rear yard. 5. Lots 1, 4, 6, 8, and 45 should have attached elevated porches that are visible from the rear yard from Wilson Avenue. 6. At least 24 houses should have wrap-around front porches (at least two per phase) / / c' / _~ ~~ 1 I 1 ROOF PITCH & MATERIAL PORCHES & BALCONIES 1 1 ®®I _ T ~~ 'c I I ~ f J~.,.,.,:... ~ I;II; I OVERHANGS SIDING I~ DOORS & ENTRY WINDOW TREATMENT CHIMNEYS UNIQUE DETAILS EXHIBIT 19 UNIQUE DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL THEME COUNTRY [JNIVERSII'Y PLANNED DEVELOPMEI` FOR u cr. uucoaeox~~n RESOLUTION NO 02-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00317, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF 172 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS FOR TENTATIVE TRACTS 14497, 14498, AND 15838 ON 52 44 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE RANCHO ETIWANDA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND WILSON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225- 101-31, 45 AND A OF PORTION 43 A Recitals 1 Standard Pacific Homes filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2001-00317, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of February 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on February 27, 2002, inGuding wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue and is presently vacant, and b The properties to the north, south, and west of the subject site are vacant The property to the east are existing single-family homes and Utility Comdor ,and c The property has been rough graded, and d The protect consists of Tract(s) 14497, 14498 and 15838, and The protect falls within the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed project is consistent with the ob~ectrves of the General Plan, and ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-30 DRC2001-00317 -STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES February 27, 2002 Page 2 b The proposed use is in accord moth the ob~ectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site ~s located, and c The proposed use is in compliance ninth each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together moth the conditions applicable thereto, moll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vianity 4 An Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 8808291) was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino as a Master Environmental Impact Report for the University/Crest Planned Development The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Master Environmental Impact Report has been certified, no further Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent protects vvithin the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report On October 26, 1999, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors certified a supplement to the Environmental Impact Report (State Cleannghouse No 98121091) because of a revision to the Umvers~ty/Crest Planned Development In August of 1999, the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Addendum to address issues assoGated ninth adoption of the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement The Addendum identified no substantial changes in the protect that would require a mator revision to the previous Environmental Impact Report Based upon the facts and information contained in the certified Environmental Impact Report, together vwth all wntten and oral reports, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment. a There have not been substantial changes in the project that requre mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report because of no new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the seventy of the previously identified significant effects b There have not been substantial changes ninth respect to the circumstances under which the protect is undertaken, which moll require mator revisions to the previous Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the seventy of previously identified significant effects c There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known wdh the exeroise of reasonable diligence at the time the Environmental Impact Report was certified as complete, that shows any of the follomnng 1) the protect will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Environmental Impact Report, 3) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the protect but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or altematrve, or 4) mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different from those analyzed in the final Environmental Impact Report, would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the protect proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference j~-70 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-30 DRC2001-00317 -STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES February 27, 2002 • Page 3 Planrnng Diwsion 1) Where slope conditions regwre retaining walls to achieve 15 feet of usable rear yard area, prowde a logical transition to allow access onto slopes for maintenance purposes, such as stairs, ramps, etc Final design shall be to the satrsfacbon of the City Planner, pnor to issuance of grading pennds 2) Provide a 3-foot minimum landscape area between back of sidewalk and a 6-foot block wall on all comer side lots 3) Reduce the property line walls/fences between lots to a maximum of 7 feet in height Where combination walls exist, limit the retaining walls to a maxmum of 2 feet rn height. Engineenna Drwsion 1) DRC2001-00317 shall comply v~nth all the conditions of approval of Tentative Tracts 14497, 14498, and 15838 and "Development Agreement, the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga and U C P Incorporated," dated November 29, 2000, CO 00-088 The Conditions of Approval of the Tentatve Maps shall be completed tointly wrath the general ongoing and speafic conditions as noted in the Development Agreement 2) Wntten notice shall be required from other City Divisions, i e , Planrnng, Fire Safety, Bwlding and Safety, and the County of San Bemardmo, that all of then respective regwrements have been or v~nll be complied v~nth pnor to recording of each final map or issuance of bwlding pennrts, whichever occurs first 3) Final precise Grading Plan shall be consistent with approved Landscape Maintenance Distract (LMD) Plans Environmental Mitiaabon 1) The applicant shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures adopted in the Master Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (formerly the University/Crest Planned Development) as covered by the Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, as certified by the County of San Bemardmo, and Initial Study/Addendum as certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A" / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-30 DRC2001-00317 -STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES February 27, 2002 Page 4 BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of February 2002, by the folloHnng vote-to-Nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • ~~a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2001-00317 SUBJECT: Development Review for 172 Single-Family Homes APPLICANT: Standard Pacific Homes LOCATION: Southeast Corner Dav Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements t The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, bwldmg and construction plans, and landscape and vrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if bwldmg permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and the Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Comolehon Date .~~_ ~~- ~~- -/~- ~-~_ SC-01-02 t ~ /cJ Project NO DRC2001-00317 Completion Date 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwldmg Code and / / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwldmg and Safety Division • to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ~ / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits ___ _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~ J consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment _ _ , bulding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with ail sections of the Development Code ~ / , all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Spastic Plans in effect at the ___ _ time of building permit issuance 7 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be ~~_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 8 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/~_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 9 All bulding numbers and indmdual units shall be identified in a clear and conase manner, ~~_ including proper tllumination 10 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/~_ Homeowners' Association are subtect to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of buldng permits, whichever occurs fvst A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Droision a list of the name and address of then officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 11 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property ~~_ owner, homeowners' assocation, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of building permits 12 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all -J_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice regwrements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction actroity, dust control measures, and security fencing 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double wall _/___/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter 14 For single-family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each _J~_ support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two Yz-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 15 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant ~~ 16 Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to _/_/~ maintain an open feeling and enhance views sc-ol-oz 2 ~ 7~ Project No DRC2001-00317 Comolehon Date 17 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk 18 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry 19 For multiple family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code 20 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactures products D. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties anc streets as required by the Planning Dlviston Such screening shall be architecturally integrates with the bulding destgn and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans E. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping to the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 3 All pnvate slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and vrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted In staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are to satisfactory condition 5 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and trngatton shall be required per the Development Code and/or Rancho Etiwanda Development Agreement. This requirement shall be in addttton to the required street trees and slope planting 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be Included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to Ctty Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Droiston 7 Landscaping and Irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorattve treatment If located to public maintenance areas, the destgn shall be coordinated with the Engineering Drviston 9 Landscaping and trngatton shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code SC-01-02 - 9 ~7~ -/-/- -/~- -/-/- -/_/- _/~- ~-/_ ~~. -/.~- -/-/- -/-/- ~___/. -/__J- -/-J. ~~- Protect No DRC2001-00317 Comoletion Date F. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth. Street Rock / /~ Crusher protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash _ _ deposit on any property. 2 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special /~ Studies Zone for the Red Htll Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pnor _ _ to accepting a cash deposit on any property 3 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway protect / / in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any _ _ _ property 4 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the ~ / issuance of building permits The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation _ _ to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The bwldtmg plans will be checked for conformance wdh the mitigation measures contained in the final report 5 Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~ / implementing said measures, includtng monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requved to _ _ post cash, letter of credit, or other fortes of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719.00 pnor to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions requved by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for fortett. 6 In those instances regwring long term monitoring (t e) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the J~~ applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner pnor to _ issuance of building permits Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. G. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location . / / of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for _ _ _ matlboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/~_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan; c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, SC-Ot-02 q ~?~ Protect No DRC2001-00317 Completion Date f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance I. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2001-00317) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Bulding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mator addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Bulding and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Offiaal, after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays J. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Bulding Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s) 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind` instructions K. Grading 1 Gradmg of the subfect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Bulding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertortn such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of bulding permits ~-/_ -/-/- -J_/_ -/-/- ~__J_ ~~_ ~J. ___/_/_ ~~- ~~- _J-/_ ~_/_ _/-/_ ~-/- sc-ol-oz s ~ 7 7 Prgect NO DRC2001-00317 Completion Date A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for ail new construction protects and fo existing buildings where Improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more c combined cut and fill The Gradrng Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Californr Registered Crod Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachmen and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) Var 51 to 62 total feet on Day Creek Boulevard Var 64 5 to 76 5 total feet on Wilson Avenue 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue M. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Clty Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to' Street Name Curb 8 AC. side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Troll Gther Wilson Avenue x x x x x x d Da Creek Boulevard x x x x x x d Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and vrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for all items marked °x° In the form of an agreement and bonds by the master developer, Rancho Etiwanda 665, LLC 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Crvil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or prwate street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first _/_/_ ~-~. -/~- ~~- ~~_ -/-J- ~~- ~~ -/~- -/-J. SC-Ot-02 g ~ / Q Project No DRC2001-00317 Complenon Date b Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction _ / / permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits __ _ _ • requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condwt, and / / interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _ _ _ d Signal condwt with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction ~ / protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and _ _ interconnect caving Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Condwt shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on alt comers of intersections per City /~ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer _ _ f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / / adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are requred A cash _ _ _ deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be /~ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots _ _ h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. ~~_ 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in ~~ accordance wtth the City's street tree program _ N. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall ~_/_ be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance Distract infrastructure by Rancho Etiwanda 685, LLC (Rancho Etiwanda LMD 10). 2 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _J_/_ Districts shall be ftled with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 3 Ali required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the ~___/_ developer until accepted by the City 4 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective ~_/_ Beautification Master Plan Day Creek Boulevard O. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map ~~_ approval or the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall . be installed as required by the City Engineer Sc-a,_o2 7 X179 Protect No DRC2001-00317 Comolehon Date 2 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entering the I _/_/_ property from adfacent areas 3 Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm dram pipe measured I _/_/~ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk P. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~-/ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility _ Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the J / Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District and the _ _ _ , Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardtno A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days pnor to final map approval to the case of subdivision or pnor to the tssuance of permits to the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all uttltttes and other interested agencies involved. / / Approval of the final map will be subject to any regwrements that may be received from them ___ _ Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Ettwanda/San Sevaine Area Regtonal Mainline, Secondary Regtonal, and Master Plan Drainage _/~_ Fees shall be paid pnor to final map approval or prior to bwlding permit tssuance if no map is involved. 2. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Ctty, covering the estimated operating costs for all ~~~ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, pnor to final map approval or pnor to bwldtng permit tssuance tf no map is mvolved 3 Prior to finalization of any development phase, suffiaent improvement plans shall be completed ~___/_ beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the Ctty Engineer Phase boundartes shall correspond to lot Imes shown on the approved tentative map APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _/~_ 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices ~~_ S. Building Numbering 1 At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of ~_/_ protect shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover North shall be at the top and so indicated Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Stgn Permit and approval by the Planning Division APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING • CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-Ot-02 8 ~~ '~w~ • FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT * _ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION , STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0533 PROJECT#: DRC2001-00317 PROJECT NAME: Rancho Etlwanda Estates DATE: January 15, 2002 PLAN TYPE: SFR Very Fire Hazard Seventy Zone APPLICANT NAME: UCP, Inc. OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Division 3 FLOOR AREA (S): Not Greater than 3,600 s.f. LOCATION: Tracts 14997, 14998, and 15838 SEC Day Creek and Wilson FD REVIEW BY Steve Locate, Fire Protection Planning Speaalist PLANNER: Douglas Fenn ALL OF THE FOLL OWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770 , EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the mmimum standard for approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fire Distract requirements for the proposed protect Changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fue Distract requrements. Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for rewew Prior to approval by the Planning Diwsion compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed All Fve District conditions and comments must be addressed for construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Dnnsion to schedule an appointment to venfy compliance A. Community Factlipes Distracts 1 This protect is subtect to the requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Faalities Distract. B. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire Distract and the Water District 2 Pnor to the issuance of any bulding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards 3 Fire flow requirements for this protect shall be 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch m accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended ~~'1 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Drvis~on 5 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan subrrr~ for review and approval Include main size 6 Prior to the issuance of any bwldmg permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 7 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflectwe pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained m good condition by the property owner C. Water Availability 1 Prior to the issuance of a bwldmg permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract Water Avadabddv for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract It sufficient water to meet fire flow requrements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshmg system may be regwred m each structure affected by the insuffiaent flow D. Automatic Fve Sprinkler Systems 1 All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E. Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 2 Required Note All commemial, industrial, public assembly, educational and multi-family residen bwldmgs constructed m the High Fve Hazard wildland mtertace areas -Very High Fire Hazard Sev Zone (VHFHSZ), State Responsibtlity Area (SRA), and other areas wdhm the Hazardous Fue Area, s be provided with an approved automatic fve sprinkler system 3. Required Note Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commercial structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E. Fue Access), shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system meeting the approval of the Fire Distract 4 Prior to the issuance of a bwldmg permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire sprinkler system Fve Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 5 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services E. Fire Access 1 Fire District access roadways shall mclude public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes 2 Residential Prior to recordation of a subdmsion/tracVparcel map, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes All roadways or fire lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 3 Residential & Commeraal Prior to issuance of any grading permRs, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fire District m consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall mclude the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the str or court measured flow line to flow Ime All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked wh~ a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise regwred Applicable CCBR's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modifications m fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fve District, Fire Safety Dmsion I~~ 4 The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire District access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet 5 The minimum inside turn radius is 20 feet The minimum outside turn radus is 50 feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet. 6 Pnor to the issuance of any grading pertmts, the applicant shall submd and obtain the Fire District's approval of the construction of any gate across regwred Fire District access roadways/driveways 7 Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 niches from the ground up, so as not to impede fue vehicles 8 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in width and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance wdh Fire District Standards 9 Dead-end Fire Distract access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the fuming around of fire apparatus This may include a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire District 10 More than one fire distract access roadway shall be provided when d is determined by the Fire Distract that access by a single road might be unpaved by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conddions, or other factors that could limit access Provide secondary egress/access in accordance with Fire District standards 11 Dead-end roadways shall not exceed 600 feet in length measured from the centerline of the cross street to the curbline at the top of the cul-de-sac. 12 Amend site access to accommodate Fire District emergency vehicle access or provide automatic fire sprinkler systems for Trect 14998 Lots 20 through 38 and Tract 14997 Lots 30 through 47. This is to mitigate inadequate access due to greater than 600-foot dead-end. Also, any structure located on a street with a cul-de•sac radii of less than 50-feet requires an automatic fire sprinkler system to mitigate • 1 inadequate access. P 3 nor to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall submd plans and obtain approval from the Fve Distract for fve lanes on regwred Fire Distract access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be submdted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the °FD Access - Fve Lanes" standard 14 Pnor to the issuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fve lane plan The CCBR's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibd parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The ' CC&R s shall also identrfy who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all requved fire lanes 15 New residential buildings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bwlding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, adddional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry F. Hazard Notrfication -Fire (State Law) 1 Protects located in the State Responsibility Areas (SRA), or the Very High Fve Hazard Seventy Zone (VHFHSZ) are within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District State Law requres notification to be made Pnor to the recordation of a subdivision map, the subdivider shall place a note on the map stating the protect is located within the State Responsibility Area or the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, as appropriate, due to wddland exposure The note is subtect to the approval of the Fire District and is based on SRANHFHSZ maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fve Protection 2 Hazardous dire Area Development Pnor to the issuance of a bwlding permd, the applicant shall meet all regwrements for development and construction within the Hillside Distract, the Very High Fire Hazard Seventy Zone (VHFHSZ), and the State Responsibddy Area (SRA) This may include increased street widths, on-site water supplies, fve-resistive construction, Class A roof assemblies, fve sprinklers, etc ,contained in the Fire Safety Overlay District Standards ~ 03 G. Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for All Maps and Plans) 1 This protect is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" based on proximity to or exposure urban -wildland interface Mitigation measures are regwred The building(s) shall meet the construction standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay District, Area FR-1 or Area FR-2 2 Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading or building permit, the applicdnt shall obtain the Fire Dis~ approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program 3 Prior to the issuance of any precise grading or bwlding permit, the applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel modrfication/hazard reduction plan and program The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of risk to the structures by vegetation 4 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit or Certrficate of Occupancy, the developer shall have completed, in cooperation with the Fire District, that portion of the approved fuel modrfication/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the protect area. Approval is subtect to final on-site inspection 5 Prior to the issuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modrfication/hazard reduction plan shall be installed The Fire District shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modrfication areas. Further, the installed fuel modrfication plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fire District The CC&R's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modfication zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subtect to (annual) triennial inspections 6 Phased protects or temporary fuel modfication plans must meet the requirements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire District H. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times I. Arohrtectural Building Plans 1 Prior to approval of a site developmenUuse permit, or the issuance of a bwlding permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Call the Fire Construction Sernces Unrt at (909) 477-2713 for the Fire Safety Srte/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal J. Fire District Fees Due 1. Fire District fee(s), plus a $1 00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District as follows $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $66 for Preliminary Fuel ModrficationNegetation Management Plan $66 for Final Fuel ModrficationNegetation Management Plan per Phase X 12= $792 $132 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) X 12 phases (Models, I thru X, Build-out) $1584 Fire District Fees due to date $1584 ($2574 total calculated to date) 'Note. Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, fuel modificationNegetation management etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans K. Plan Submittal Required Notice Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwiding, Fve, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards ~ NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems, fuel modrfication any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision ~~, • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CIICAMONGA Staff IZcport DATE: February 27, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2001-00570 - W F CONSTRUCTION - A request to construct four industrial buildings (Bwlding A - 9071 square feet, Building B - 9,060 square feet, Bwlding C - 28,931 square feet, and Building D - 40,240 square feet) on 4.61 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located at the southeast corner of Center Avenue and Effen Street -APN. 1077-401-17 and 21. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSEENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15732 - W.F. CONSTRUCTION - A request to subdivide a 2.71-acre property into three parcels (Parcel 1 - 29,353 square feet, Parcel 2 - 26,009 square feet, and Parcel 3 - 62,775 square feet) in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 17), located at the southeast corner of Center Avenue and Effen Street -APN• 1077-401-21 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• A. Surroundino Land Use and Zoning. North - Industrial building and Cucamonga County Water District facility, Industrial Park District (Subarea 17) South - Industrial buildings; Industrial Park District (Subarea 17) East - Deer Creek Channel and commercial center; Flood Control, General Commercal Distract West - Single-family residences, Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) B General Plan Designations Protect Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Flood Control, General Commercial . West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. Site Characteristics• The site is undeveloped and relatively flat. Vegetation found on-site consists of indigenous weeds and annual grasses. ITEMS B & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00570 AND SUBTPM15732 - W F CONSTRUCTION February 27, 2002 • Page 2 D Parkins Calculations. Type of Use Square Parking Number of Number of 4 Bwldinas Footage Ratio Spaces Spaces Reouired Provided Office 11,000 1/250 44 44 Manufacturing 12,500 1/500 25 25 Warehousing 69.302 1/1000 69 72 Total• 92,802 138 141 ANALYSIS. A. General• The applicant proposes to construct 4 industrial buldings, and a subdivision of 3 parcels for manufacturing and warehousing users The proposed design of the buildings complies with the Design Gwdelines of the Development Code, and the site has been designed with sufficient parking spaces to accommodate the uses. B Design Review Committee. The Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on January 15, 2002, and recommended several revisions The applicant agreed to the changes and has worked diligently with staff to address those identified issues (Exhibit°G1"). The Committee (McNiel and Stewart) then reviewed the revised development plans on February 5, 2002, and recommended approval subject to those conditions (Exhibit °G2°). The applicant has revised the plans to reflect those Conditions of Approval. C Techrncal Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the conditions as outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval In reviewing the project, it was found that temporary access with a temporary parking area was established on the parcel of the proposed Building C (Lot 11 of Tract 11428), which has been used by the tenants of the existing bwlding located east of the parcel (Lot 12 of Tract 11428) The two parcels are owned by the same property owner, who is selling the parcel for Bwidings A, B, and C to the applicant for development. The property owner agreed to restore and re-construct the driveway access for the existing bwlding at its original location, which is off Cartdla Street (Exhibit "I°). The re-construction of the driveway access necessitates a Minor Development Review to ensure the driveway is installed per City Standards and the off-site and on-site arculation is safe. This item has been placed as a Condition of Approval D Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff completed Part II, the Environmental Checklist (Exhibit "H"). Staff determined that the project could have a sigrnficant adverse impact on short-term air quality during the preparation of the site for construction, such as grading and the exhaust from the ~~C ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00570 AND SUBTPM15732 - W F. CONSTRUCTION February 27, 2002 Page 3 egwpment. With mitigations, the potential impact can be reduced to a level less than significant; therefore, staff recommends the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Development Review DRC2001-00570 and approval of the Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15732 through the adoption of the attached Resolution. The City Planner will issue an approval letter for Development Review DRC2001-00570 (Exhibit "J") Respectfully submitted, f r Br uller City Planner BB.NF/~c Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E° - Elevations and Floor Plans Exhibit "F" - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15732 Exhibit "G" - Design Revew Committee Action Comments dated January 15, 2002, and February 5, 2002 Exhibit °H° - Initial Study Exhibit "I" - Letter from applicant dated February 5, 2002 Exhibit "J" - Draft City Planner Approval Letter dated February 28, 2002 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15732 -" 1 ~J ~~C 3 ----- -- ~j 1 ~C N W M _ `•1-~ I ~ i SITE PLAN -LOT 118 13 (BLDG A,B,C 8 D)/NOTES ExIenKD DlDU9TRIIIL PARK l u S ~t~ DORBET ST PARK •~•~• i ~.e.. s.........,a«. ~ Ir(j(((1 EXISTIND ADJACENT 11 LDT ~~ ~ `~ s aa€ ~~x 3•° l~ >'~`~p ::7 ~~ 1~pE a ~ 44i~`~'IaI~ ,I i .°I~i;~ ~ "i~III i ~`~Illi -tom ~ i ]]R19~]RWII MaliWlpp~ rurau aa~ ruu ~a ]..a ".. su]a em] • vu ~~ '4) ~ - a-------- 0 I s ~~ ~-I a~ R 6 ~ -~r ~Y ~~ z O Q W J W 0~ ZI i, ,_ ~i I ~ z~ ~ a ~~ 4 ~ d1 1 K P a _~• ~~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~` R 9 o s- - Z F ___ Q w J W K __ w d ~ e 9a-;~ ~ ',:~ 1~ ~ ~ d Yak I~~ Wj ~. 0~ D 41 Qj I r a ,i -~ o~~;- m m ,~ p f . I I ~i 1 i ,I+ G ~ ~` G I ~ - ~ _.,..... W; ~® p G a.---- -------7- --- -- ------- --- 3;3-x' ~~ of ®~ ~ a a a a l a o z~ E d~~ iNp--- - >-~ W 6~ fiff •I ~ ~runamean S'ivunae~sa ~ N, Q .d ¢; ~0 I 0 ~~r~ p e IB\S q ~ 9 a s -u _e_ _ - d ''~! ~ ~; - ~ r u_ I~ 4 t°^ ~I ;d~~ a .14F- F ~ i3]ls [I ~ 9 U ~ ~g¢i~yA v r ~ y3e~y Q W J 9 IIC~ @~Ed ~ilP ~.. ~~ j ~ 6 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r ~ Sd~4 ~ ~1 ~~€!dtgl l~i~~~~~f~ 9 ..x.lr ~_; !~ ~ mmem~~®®®W®®®® ~ ~l~~ , ,,r ,,, , ` "~ J p ! $ 3 q Y q ~~ 4. 9 7 A9 ~ 3 9 9~i~-] 3 ~ 3[ { ff¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ q i~la~ ~ p p ~f ji~s26 ~~e~a?~S S ~P ~a~ gq ]11 "7 yg ~ 4 -~ ~ ~~l ~ ~ ; ~ ell ~- oe®m ar.e®m¢oee mo f $ d,§ 1 n ~~~€ : d 4Y! ( i s ~ i4 1i € C~ ... . ~ q yyyy f~~d~ 5 \~Y v g5~~ • _. A _ [19 I ~ r r- a fig r ---.- ; gg8&~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~1 -1 ~,--~---~--- . _ e ~ ....~, j m6~a j j o.I _ ~ l~g4 . 8 ! E ~p }~_ ___ p] x pjj 1 f j __ I -i __-_ -~~§9~P§ .kill€:~~ dEr! `L ; ~ , e ~ f L7 jj- 2 ~~ ~ e fy ¢! /'x ~_] i - ~ Q e e ~ \ H f 4N~ ]~ ~ ~ ~ ~f J N 7 6k p Q __ mrea na. ~~'I~y" mny DNIQl109 lVItl1SO0N1 K 6~~( i~ ~Y'd''8~>a TNi ~__-~ N - __ __ ~~ -~ r i ~~ ~ ~ p~~ _ ~m .. .a.~;~ _ _~, ~ - - + ~} , n f~;-B i.545 pgiF in~ §A.p i 7 yy ~~46' S ~~~o 9 ~~~~ •. a k 5fl C7OG OO~©OO O = ~ al @@~ g ~ y$ ? AA4~ a 9 ` I -•I ~ ~ a y ~~~~f ~ ~ y3Y ~~g~~ 5g'~93~~k~~ec ~ ~ 2 - ~~~~§~ @ @~ €~ g gg g [~9t~~~~C3 g ~ y oooo o _ _ YW l]YOI~~ ~WY~µ ~ ns< ~~ ~ p P O i 6 < ~ ~ .a. oeiaime inxisnaxi :qn d ~y p iN a a f H z v .Y q€ B ~ x~ ~ i ~ ~i 4 43~ ~ `ry a G§s5p ~' p, 4t~ ~ ~~~~ epep k Y9~~ y~o~ :S ~ .HH9Y9~di~ it ~ N O J W Q W v N Z 2 O Q Q w ~ J W W W W ~ O ~ N Y Z F W F Z LL Z Q a W ~~ ~` I ^ r _\) ~~ ` //~y~ l 1 -. 1 1 sl r_ I 1 611'1 II ` ~ I 1 ~I'11 II I I I ii 11i i ___!_____~__ ____ 1 I el II I EI '~~I " I 5 sl I g~ i n `~„ . _ ' 1 :~ I Is ~m Io Ir „e mxe mN Ise/n-v ~ I •r 11 ' _ E 1 ~~ ~ il~'-.^-` ______________ _______________°____---~_=''F_'_ L*1~1_ it e NeIL. I a' I ooRSC} (PmvN 1 I it G ~~ ~, it __ - ___-_ __~-_ ~~} ~ Cv.~ O~+ ~ a~ /~•/) ~ Oren ~ .^ .~ G I A ~f j' I 11~ 1 B -`_- -- -_ -I ~ Qmnr~w~~c~~w;uMrn u•m~onR I I •~ i N I ~ ~ 0 mm.. , r ns..u .N, I I ~ ' ^ y I r•I 1 II ~' ' ~ 1 , E ®mismN~o~.ro r.,..u ,e..na. rnn.c L.1 ~ , _ ~ 1 c 1 `. I I I I 1 I 1 PARc EI- NO I i e n I ` I I I G g I P I I --- --- ~ ~ I ; 4 e I j .; a' ,, CC ~ ry I I G' I 1 PPRa A ~ i I ; ~, I I z = i I P~RIx"i- .,, QSi. G I ^..d ~ i G ~ ~~ i ,', g>< ' I' I I ' ~y E 9 e ~4d i I I I __ - ~ I ar G i Q3 I ! I I )~ D ti.~ ~ i 2i 1 11 I 1 r i I -~ -- I __ ~ EiF I - Fiuua I ~ r 1 I ' I ' c I I ~( ~ - I 1 (I n II I 1 I ~ 1 j I ~` _ h, tl ~ ~ ~ I 1 a I I I = e t _ -..-__-_. ________ ___ I II ni ~ • our ~ I I I I 11 P I NO 150}9 pd MO I]0}9 P ~ p HO I}Oxg I I p ~ Sx Mgp ~/y~ S gppg .~~PfJ~~ NO,S ISUx9 L 5~~pp//uu SOxY I I I 0 S I Pi4N mWS1Hl.l P.R. INOVSIRIU P.ONN NUUSITISx ep I~ 5004N~~N I ______ I PL P.N P 1 I I ~ r r r _~ LIULU~ ,, I I' , ~ ~ ~` L!°'°y 6 ; ._ I i -_. ~ -~. .- I I ~Lr. i1N f. I PI II .... I I :~:L~ a ~. vlrv I } it i I +,?6 rr•~• II I I I I III I FORESIGHT ENGINEERING)( 1 1 III 1 ' +m°°.cwc I 1 II ~ 1 s..,. _.r s.n ,.. { 1 II J PRECISE n GRAUwC P_AN ~e 1 ~ I ~ I~ C TCN iA TIV~ ` V 1 1 1 Ll - - - - -- - _ ~ ~ G \ RANCHO l JCANGVI ^ ~\ _ - _ _ _ J i I .om rae r R[OS CdIRI ~ ~x/ssAr ~ z~,a I ~ I ~ ~ ----- <-o !~ ~ vl I j: s ~ 2~~ `t' I< p 'I I pe s~'-,~E (S,~I ~ i i ~ J' !eE I ~. ' W p 4= GHQ p 1 ~ _ ~ ~ I O S I a°: '!i (J Szu. Vv2 pR e ~ ice- ~~ ~ I r '" a a r 9.•! ~ ~~[:,1; w~~ ~ :v' I i I I a~ C v. ~°t In eE OU~o ~~ ` ~ c,C ~`~ ~~~3 wo Znx ~_~ 0 0 i e e ae 3 a ~ Y e ~ „ t e I • '3NNHbJ ~Gb1 `~,°~F°"n~ y~y g •e Y a ~ ay ~ $ Np0 sov d 3 g Y ~' `~ I ~` GGG7j 1 e _ d ~ xg" g • 8 ;~' ~ ~ NnOJ GNa e e ~ e e i~ E'g ~ ° ~ ° U ?h,,x~s`~~~?2~?` ObbNb39 NbS O ©00 ©O~ ©~ ~ T ^ 5 x ~Ti~ h '~~'x 3 N h ,~,.. Y ~~ x„h~ `~~ ~ ~4a b p ~: °6 aA w ::" ~` r, s ` gd a ~~'^ F ,.. ~..' I ye ter ~F: r~ :~~4 `x.... Y ...~ I Pf a! T u ,~ L4 I ,ty; p?pp! .:~~~ "~ ! ! ^ leg Y9 a ~ M r°~, ~ !- I O g ~ -J Z~. off; ~ try ... ~g ° I ~" _ _ ~i ._.. _ x33'+5 ~; _-- s--- ! g e ~ oR~ blllladG 9y e ' ~ ~~ ~ t¢;'sa!a~g~314~f :e?pi~rf~~d j3,1~3f5l9e ~,tgt~3ppr . ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~gv'.9E99z5~;3iir9lgifFil:~lg~g2g:YgoEF~tl3ii5135ig~ ~~ `•' rr Ca ~ .e.;F • ~_~ ~ < W l Wa Jq MpLLl11YLNOi J.y .1N3DY ..,tl...._,,,,a„ Ntr'Id `JNIZNt~''Id ...~....~ h~.a~.~NO~.., ~ e tsNed' x I owavne iriuisnaa ~ • M u~q~ fl m f W ~ Q T !~ r0 v C V ~~ ji 4~ ~~ •aa aa~.Nao ~] j i - I ~' ^ ~ ~ ~ F ~ C ~ A ~~niwaaaau 0 ~ ~ [_~/ J O. i • S W-IMINp V W l~Y 'DW MO,IJDLLMW.Y ~1[aD~ "^'~1TJY1~1 AIYJ YDMD[YDDD OIIJMYt• ~ '"' NH'Id JNI.LNti'Id ,,,,,e yND[ N.ID, iD Owavm, D W~ ~ a~'J I owaiwa nviuaenaw °•^^ ~ w w.+.o l f i~ ~ ~;! . e E ~~ ~~~. ~, a a W W F .aeele.eie 0po0 S3 _ a_.DYe d-Y[ uuS 1 ~ S 0~~ ! pg~ gt ' ~e ~ 9°~ I d ~ *)_ 2~ ~~ 4 ~ 3i~ ~ :~~;Z _~ 4 tf~d~ ~~ °IV~p 5~Z73iZ?ZGI~urCl1 wa e-~ ~ 3-~' z > %. _ of e t }~ [a/t ~ 7~ p' C 1L#3 9Ii a~e _ ~ R666 ~ 'tI 9Qao g4{ ~ ~ ; ;, • ~~ ~- ~- 4et .: ZI ~ ~~ -y ' ~. eq ~~ CY~'I '~~ t~[ la `D = `Y it T 1 e(!~ ~~ S! ~ ~~ [[ ] Z Z h C . : ~ =1 ii `~ ~ ~ f i iii i~ ~ i_°~ Si iIi Si : t) '1 ~; i L't ! ~: ~ Ie i iii !~ If i~ ,a ic; ~I i ~~~ 3 ~ i?{ it att. i-I ~I S _! i~3. ~ i~ {I Iejn 1jl~i ~;~ ~ t;~ !~ i~i ~~ ! it"I li! # S = is'j 'I i, ii !~f IL!_ iI' ! ~ji i' ~_~ ~{t! ~~i' ~~~ °:! i 3! i a~ a` a~ i1(:lj~ sa ~ !il ~;! ii: E ii i:i` si~ ~e ~ j I~ij ~i c5 ea IiEE i=i~ !ii 4! iii !Ii '.ii 11ii }:! ap ~ ~! !! :! ~ili ~'! i~ i!~ i~{ i:~l it~ !~ ~il i i i_i r !s =fe! !!! 1 ,! ii c_ ! !! :l :.= i ~ :ff- ' 11 S~i aiI :tii ~ D ci ii • :~ i!id Y1 ~i != 5~i i3tl ~13 is ~ ifii i a3 ;x +~ . _ ,~ ,~/ ~ ~a 1'1 n g [ z~ y p ap~j •Fj °~ ~ [ -------- --- u jz i :4z ` ~r ~ o ~..- z~~3[sr3. 0 0 __~ i__~___-_ 7•~ .c ! rr°p: II_ ~rl. ~ ~~ ~ °. OL I B _ _ _ _ _ __i~ __~__ •, ~ „ , ... .s, C~ enm • awvai ouauieua sufeee nea eme +a euw m e wnw v+n ~ ee. _ 3~t W Q O D J Ol 2 f Q W J W H N t W 6 O O J m Z _~ f Q W J W f M W 3 ~r ,.=J 1 [3£C~ ~ _ ~a u ~~a~ewawran~ume E ~ ~ ° :'4N .~. DNIOlNB l~Itl130GN1 k i V a`! qn fiq< N _ ` r r V Ie` Q O D J m 2 ~_ F Q 7 W J W S F S O Z n[.ese iew~ [uu [r[o •i~en~ wuz ~ blle M [[[ ~ c ~ ~ P l L C ~ i uiiw n a a>.~ 4. ~w pal ~ '~Yp °I ? ~ ~ a f p' 3 UNIOl1091~Itl150UN1 k A I q'I~^`•~A k7~l7 :-a @~'~~ ~ g~z :~ ~s~a~a ~ ~~ C. ~ 1~ 8t l O O v w Q W 0 o O ~~ W ~9 YS 0 J m Q ~ ~v t c C~ e 8 . ~ 3 ~ ~~ , 6 Fgp f p5p }i { 6~~~~ ddd L W ~ ip~ U1Z 4YY6 W F 0 _ JI V3 Wi o ~€36 KQ~ C'~ W o Fa. 4 Q ~~x ~~.Cia L ~% • I` J • ~i ~R319 • IOOTI Wl~ ~b10] t~[.N{ I~N~ [YID l] ~~pp Yet vn~ ~ m ~~i~ ~21 b"e ~~ m O O J _m Z Q_ f Q 1 W J W H H Q W m O D J m_ _~ (- Q W W f N W 3 _ ~_ ~_ ~~C~3 m O O J m_ = i _~ f Q 7 W i WI F S 0 2 .._- ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ; uu~~»e.ianm~oxam I ~ ~I ~ o O .8. DNIDlIN9 lYItl1500N1 ~ ~ y t ~~y. 9 y R'b ~ ~.<Sn aa~ m O D J m_ Z _0 f Q 7 W W Z f O 41 WKLY ~ lOpii. Y[LL~~I pO'J ~-y/% xy~~ _._ =~ - oMiaiine s~viuisnaw a d~ x°ig n .b~~<~6ii~E • n e x J J A J 1 m a O r O m t = e Q ~ J . a f o O v z o F R ~~ ~ ~ s _~' `) A e' II ~~-~} ,. c'y @~'~o ~ ~~#~ # i~~ ~ €s~~'i6 ~r .4 W C m O ~~ ~'~~ .S t§a ~ w ~~ p a es J ~ ~~ m ~R 8 8a S o~ 3 e~ ~ ~~L m f 6 ~ O ~ '~~ ~ m 2 ~~~~~ a a a z ~~ E#6 JQ N 6Y7 LN 99t ~~ O AC O 2 i ¢ ~t~~ O • o e e F A ~ ~ F ~~~~ ... i ~u.Yi ..y::.y ~ a: ~ ~ is ~~ -=,ter-`=-==_=-#~=-~~ ~- SOUTH ELEVATION(BLDO C) _~ (5 a .e. ---- -- EAST ELEVATION(BLDO Cl (7 ~ _ l i _~ l ... ...._ ~ _. _.,,. NORTH ELEVATION(BLDO C) •••~ -•1- ~=---=--r-~-L-~-~~= n .o D ..w. .o. l l -_ 6 a .a S µ ~ ~ ~ N 5 ... o. - , 4 1 `ii _ - - _ _ _ _ ____ _ ___ ___ __ __ .~__ t-- - - - - l o l I _ __ -- i- Ivl ~ .e 9 • b e h - - - - '~• - - •r - - 6 WEST ELEVATION(BLDD C> a i . t,~ I~ 5 ~ €. ~~ ~~~ ~1 I ~ ~ ~~ tl¢ 8 ~r I ~;., ~ ~ ; l `!~I l i l Rll;l I» <~ 2 ~~°° v b 9 v 1 i ! ~ ..n.a .....an xaiaai.na nnws uwr .us. ~a ..wa xv m.aa x.an ..u _ i w-. an: aacr.o>`ii _; I I u ~ s O ~ ~ i~ 'a ~ a .4. ONIOll09 I~ItlL50UNl * C~ A^ b~ ` C~ ~~C1~ t L J Y L L [[[r+[c icw~ [~u~[~[o [[[wa n.[ c~mN aa~~ __ 3n: ~~u cN I I ~[ b,,. ~ - --- w,~. ~`~ ~~P III°YQ 9~~'~ ~~~ ~t~~*_r~j~'/~` ~ oxiaiine iriuisnaHi p iy, 4 ap ~il~P i la I ~~4 s ~1 ~~~~ ~$ ® I a ® I ~ ~ I j _u I~ I -- ~ ----a----- ~-----~----- I z 9 ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ --- -~----i------~-----~----- I S I --L-~` --- H. I-----1----- 0 C [I {~ b [~36 I ~1~~ 23 =SiY~ 8 ~ I I ~1g ? ~ I I ~\ 9 I - ,~ - s , ~'~ ~N.[ 0 0 J m a 0 0 LL • a~ F, ~~ :~ 1' l~ C'~ __ ~ni > _ _ i ~ i. it c , t ` - C Z ~ L "i de4_ y __ ~ a E 2qi A~ ry. ES I ~ -T ] y >~ i3 F~~' )P"^ • y5 8L9ion•S` ~ ~ i^3p a ~'~ 8 ___ CC d~L y~i _~ I ~ ~ i I • C $8 ~• ~' ' i I r ~~ ' 1 ns: I _ Imo. I p I ~` v~ I vm vv~l ~ ' ~ I ~~/ u `v I ~ ~~___ ,u~A, I 1 ' ~~ 1 ~ -----~- --~` \\\ y i 1~ \\1 ^ x I ~< I __ ___ s~< L____ ' ~t I _ o I ~ ~ \~ i ' na ~' III • I ~' III / iia I I am § III ~ ~ I I __ _ _ 'll c I I I .o - - III III - tl ~p I a g I i ~..___ i _____! ___ _ J -- ---y--- - -- - ba3~x]J ____--i._______r_________-_______________° d e V~ --~* :<-.; i i i I I i I I -- -- f L _ rnluel vnu_A. F ~ C • '_ ' ' - s 2 i [ = fi" i pfS F° A A ~ ~ Y £ A 2 AE ~~~eeeY ese z5 ~9Etai6d A~9 ~? OOEODO O ©O® .v~fu n~axavuv~na/uvvxaxavvv Iuvvv `~~ - - ---1--- ~oi I I #.• u u n I~ I ~ I~ I ICI III I , I ~l it % I E I I II y I I II II ~I gl ~ _ __I __________ -- _ 1_ __ ----- - -1-- - ~ _ 30x3~r -~ /~ A \ ~~~~~ • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:40 p.m. Rick Fisher January 15, 2002 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00570 -WF CONSTRUCTION - A request to construct four mdustnal buildings (Building A - 9071 square feet, Building B - 9,060 square feet, budding C - 28,931 square feet, Building D - 40, 240 square feet) on 2.71 acres of land m Subarea 17 of the lndustnal Park District, located at the southeast side of Center Avenue and Effen Street, and at the east side of Cartilla Avenue-APN: 1077-401-1 7 8 21. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15732 -WF CONSTRUCTION - A request to subdivide a 2.71 acre property into three parcels (Parcel 1- 29,353 square feet, Parcel 2- 26,009 square feet, Parcel 3- 62,775 square feet) on 2.71 acres of land in Subarea 17 of the Industrial Park District, located at the south east side of Center Avenue and Effen Street -APN: 1077-401-21. Design Parameters: The four buildings will be used for manufacturing and warehouse activities. The office portion of the buildings will front the public right-of-ways of Center Avenue, Effen Street and Cartilla Avenue. The loading areas are oriented to the interior of the site beyond screen walls and the office areas. Buildings materials include concrete Ult-up walls, horizontal reveal lines, painted inset panels, and aluminum fixed glass windows and doors. The site is surrounded by mdustnal development to the south, single-family residential to the west across Center Avenue, an ambulance service to the north across Effen Street, and commeroial uses across the flood control channel to the east. The site for Buildings A, B, and C will be subdivided into three lots and each lot complies with the minimum lot size (one-half acre) and minimum parcel width (100 feet) required in the lndustnal Park District. Building D is on rts own lot. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to prowde an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Provide a second primary building material such as medwm sandblasted material for all budding elevations. The office entry section, the vertical recess element together with the square inset, and the top horizontal band should be sandblasted. 2. Provide two 14 by 50 feet trader parking spaces elsewhere on-site or eliminate the two at grade roll-up doors for Budding C. Trailer parking spaces m front of the roll-up doors cannot be counted as complying with Codes. 3. Increase the maneuvering area to park a trailer at the trader parking space closest to Budding C by eliminating parking spaces and planters at the southwestern edge of the budding. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1 Locate carpool spaces closer to the office entrances. 2. Locate the bicycle racks closer to the office entrances for Buildings A, B, and C. 3. Consider removing the driveway located closest to Center Avenue. ~~8~,~~t' ~~CaO DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00570 8 SUBTPM15732 - WF CONSTRUCTION January 15, 2002 Page 2 4. Increase the height of the parapet wail outside of the office entry portion for Buildings A and B to screen roof-mounted equipment since they are developed for speculative uses. 5. All wall-mounted light fixtures shall have light pointed downwards. Wall-pak type of light fixtures that produce glare must be avoided. Poiicy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion: Paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 2. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all dnveway aisles, entrances and exits shall be stnped per City standards. 3. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial, office, and industnal facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. 4. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industnal projects shall be specimen size trees, 24-inch box or larger. . Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the development plans to address above identified issues and submit for further Committee review. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Rick Fisher The Committee reviewed the protect and directed the applicant to revise the development plans and address the identified issues listed in the staff report. The applicant agreed. The Committee directed the applicant to submit revised plans for review at the next meeting under Consent Calendar item. In addition to the design issues listed in the staff report, the Committee also directed the applicant to address the following items: 1. Construct a 6-foot decorative block wall along the east property line of Building D. The wall will begin at the north property Ime and terminate at the trash enclosure. A 6-foot wrought iron fence will begin at the trash enclosure and terminate at the south property line. 2. The Committee suggested that the screen wall at the loading dock could be reduced in height and in place of it provide guardrail. 3. Submit Roof Plans, detail sections, and materials for new roof screen wall that may be needed at the time of future tenants to ensure that any roof egwpment not placed at the office portion of the roof is totally screened. u B~C~1 CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Rick Fisher February 5, 2002 S ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00570 -WF CONSTRUCTION - A request to construct four industnal bwldings (Bwlding A - 9071 square feet, Bwiding B - 9,060 square feet, building C - 28,931 square feet, Bwiding D - 40, 240 square feet) on 2.71 acres of land in Subarea 17 of the Industnal Park Distnct, located at the southeast side of Center Avenue and Effen Street, and at the east side of Cartilla Avenue -APN: 1077-401-17 & 21 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15732 -WF CONSTRUCTION - A request to subdivide a 2.71 acre property into three parcels (Parcel 1- 29,353 square feet, Parcel 2- 26,009 square feet, Parcel 3- 62,775 square feet) on 2.71 acres of land in Subarea 17 of the Industnal Park Distnct, located at the south east side of Center Avenue and Effen Street -APN: 1077-401-21. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart Staff Planner: Nancy Fong The Committee reviewed the revised plans at the meeting and recommended approval with the following conditions: Change the middle painted band for all buildings to sandblasted matenal. 2 Widen the band of sandblasted matenal at the tope of the buildings (all). 3. The surface matenal for the future new roof screen wall shall match the surface of painted tilt-up concrete. ~£ c as ' - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~ ENVIRONMENTAL - JUL 12 2001 INFORMATION FORM RECENED -PLANNING (Part I -Initial Study) Cfry olRandro Grcamonga Plannmp Omsron - (g0g) 4T/-2750 The purpose of this~fo'rmy'i§;~to'inform the City of the,liasi~components~o~f'th :~roposed~ project so that the City;iiiay,reviewah'e project''puisuanYto City'~pollcie~~din„~~anc~es;land: guidelines; the Califom_ ia`~Environmental Quality Act;'and'the _City~'Rules:and:Proce~ures y, ,ys~'p'b^ ,ti,~r {,, : *a ,t,,.:c.5 -"~i.:»p.. -.O~h o" T ~:v'FC~ 1:: ^.^f to Implement CEQA;; it Is _important[thattpe info`r`mation ~equested~m~-t~iis;appl~cation_be provided~in full.~,`~"~3k~ t,,~~-; - -• a,.~,~',.'.,~.~;,, ,:~:_~. z _- - ~ ~i.U'.~Y`xk4 a;1Y'~•5`~f;'t "t3tr'Y'^ i .f:{i G.,. ;f.~~i?vRr•^{'.>'3`.-'"`_„`~'F~,Y~4,~x_r_'_;,. +r~:c t, INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT 8E PROCESSED Please note that rt rs the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application rs complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be evadable to peAorm work required to provide missing information Application Number for the pro/ect to which this form pertains Pmfect Effen Street - Industrial Rancho Cucamonga, CA Tibe Name & Address of pmlect owner(s) Bill Angel 10500 Civic Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Name&Addresso/developer orprolect WF Construction, Inc. sponsor 635 W. Allen Avenue San Dimas. CA 91773 ContactPerson& Ron Busante Address 635 W. Allen Avenue San Diems, CA 91773 • ~~~I~ ,, /r ~~ Ca3 Name 8 Address of person prepanng this /orm (d drfterent hom above) Ron Busante en venue San Dimas, CA 91773 Telephone Number (909) 599-4262 Information indicated by astensk (') is not required of non-construction CUPts unless otherwise requested by staff '1) Pmwde a /ull scale (&1R x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which indudes the pro/ed sde, and indicate the sde boundanes 2) Pmwde a set of color photographs which show representative wows into the sde from tha north, south, east and west, views into and hom the site from the pnmary access points which serve the site, and representative views o/signr(icant features from the site /ndude a map showing location of each photograph 3)PmledLocabon(descnbe) Southeast corner of Center Ave. & Effen Street (private street 4) Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (attach additions/ sheet i/ necessary) Lot 11 - 1077-401-21 A B C Lot 13 1077-401-17 D 'S) Gross Sde Area (erJsq ft) Lot 11 2.75 AC/120,101 SF Lot 13 1.90 AC/82,919 SF ~6) Net Sde Area (total site size minus area o/public streets 8 proposed ded~catrons) Lot 11 (66,982 SF), Lot 13 (43,256 SF) 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the profed site (attach additional sheet d necessary None ~~Ca`~ 8) Indude a descnpbon of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to (ally implement the purled Development review, BuiJ.ding permit. 9) Descnbe the physics/ setting of fhe site as rt exists before the pro/ed mdudmg rnformabon on topography, soil stabtlrty, plants and animals, mature Gees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (mdudmg age and condition) and the use o/the sWdures Attech photographs olsrgnrficant features described In addition, site all sources of rnformadon (~ e , geological and/or hydrologic studies, brodc and anheologrcal surveys, Gaffic sfud~es) The existing site is undeveloped farm land. It appears that it may have been used to grow grapes at one time. The land is currently vacant and un-maintained as indicated by weed growth There are no mature trees on the site or other plant significant to mention. The site appears to drain naturally to the :southeast There are no trails or roads going through the property. 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or hrstonca/aspects o/the site. Site all sources of rn/ormation (books, published reports and oral history) Site has no historical significance. • 6~• C a5 11) Descnbe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircra$ roadway noise, etc) and how they will a/fect proposed uses Other than normal noise , no significant noise sources affect the sit 12)Descnbe the proposed protect in dated This should prowde an adequate descnpbon of the site in terms of uPomate use which Nall result from the proposed pro/ecf Indicate d there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the andcipated comp/edon oleach incromenL Attach addrhona/ sheet(s) d necessary The proposal includes the parcelization of the site into three (3) small size industrial tilt-up buildings. The proposed buildings would be speculative in nature. The ultimate user could be light industrial types which are typical along the surrounding areas. 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, indudmg informabon on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residenhal, commercial, etc), intensity o/land use (one-family, apar6nent houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale o/development (height, hontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) The property is isolated by Center Ave, to the West and Effen Street to the North. An emergency response company occupies the building• across Effen Street and a vacant industrial building exists to the East. A new industrial park occupies the site South of the property. No cultural, historical or scenic aspects. 14) ill the proposed protect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding genera/ area of the profect~ u The project will not change the pattern, scale or characteristics • of the surrounding area. ~~. c a~ 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term Hasa M be generated, rndudrng source end amount How wrll these Hasa levels affect ad/scent pmperbes and on~rte uses What methods of sound proofing am pmposed7 No short term or long term noise is anticipated for•this project. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or rep/acemenfs of mature or scenic pees There are no mature trees on the site. Trees will be provided per the City landscape requirements. 17) Indicate any bodes of water (rndudmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams No bodies of water drains onto the site. 18) Indicate expeded amount o/water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For /urther darrfica6on, please tooted the Cucamonga County Water Drstnd of 987-2591 a Resrden6al(gaUday) b CommeroraUlnd (gaUday/ec) Peak use (gaway) Peak use (gal/mrNac) 19)Ind~cate proposed method o/sewage d~sposa/ Septic Tank X Sewer lfsep6c tanks are proposed, attach peroolahon tests 1/discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed rnd~cate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please crontad the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987- 2591 a Resrdenhal(gaUday) b Commerpal/Ind (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number o/ resrdenhal units Detached (indicate range o/paroelsrzes, minimum /of size and maximum lot size N/A J ~~ C a1 f^ Attached (md~cate whetherunrts are 2nta/ orforsale unds) N/A . 21)Anhc~pated range ofsa/e pnces and/ormnts• Sa/ePnce(s) S N/A ~ Rent (per month) S to 22) Spec~ty number of bedrooms by unit type N / A 23) Indicate anhcpated household size by unit b'Pa N/A 24)Ind~cate the expected number o/school children who will be res~dmg wrthm the pmlect Contact the appropnate School D~stncts as shown m Attachment B a Elementary N/A b JumorHigh c SemorH~gh COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type o/use(s) and ma/orfuncbon(s) ofcommercral, mdustnal ormsbtubonal uses Buildings proposed are speculative warehouse /light manufacturing with small office spaces. 26) Total Roor area of commerraal, mdustnal, or msbtubona/ uses by type Industrial A: 11,905 SF Industrial B: 12,570 SF, Industrial C: 32,144 SF, Industrial D: 41,663 SF £ C ag ' 27)Indicatehourso/operahon: Generally 7:00 - 6:00 PM 28) Number of Total employees Undetermined Maximum ShrR• Time of Maximum Shfi• 29) Pmwde breakdown of anhcrpated lob dassficabons, rndudmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an ind~cadon of the rate of hire for each dassficadon (attach additional sheet dnecessary) Undetermined 30) Esbmadon of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside rn the City Undetermined • '31)For commercial end industrial uses only, mdreate the source, type and amount o/air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast ArrQuality Management Distnd; at (B18) 572-6283) Undetermined ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood condo/ agendas serving the proled been contacted to determine their ability to prowde adequate serwce to the proposed pm/ed7 Il so, please indicate their response Utility agencies and fire department have been contacted and their response indicates that services are available for the project. r1 U ~. C ra+~l In the known hrsfory o/this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals9 33)F~ramp/es o/ hazanfous and/or toxic matena/s rnGude, but are not l~mded to PC[3gs; rad~oacMre substances, pesbades and her6iades, fuels, a/s, sdvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage o1 any of the above • Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, d known None 34)Wll the proposed pro/ed mvoNe the temporary or lomrtenn use, storage or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals, rnGudmg but not Irmded fo those examples listed above? 1/ yes, prowde an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cabon plans No anticipated hazardous uses. 1 hereby certify that the statements fumrshed above and m'the attached exhibits present the data and mfomrabon regwred for adequate evaluation of this protect to the best o/my ability, that the /acts, statements, and rnformabon presented ans true and correct tot he best o/ my knowledge and belie/ I further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluatron can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date 7• ~~ ' ~~ S~gnaturo. Title r b~C3~ • P~~PIa m 2 ~ '`e n ~ e ie i ~ , _ = r x. _ J ~ 2 9 9999 & - _ I i , ig i ~ i ; rs 4~ ~ b~,a v~f~~t' _ ~_-. n 1 ~ >,~~,~,~ Way ~ b 0 ~_ 5..~-w ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ . as ~~' ~ S -«awa.o-~ lm"'.~.. g '~`Y` d°,rl`'• '`- _ zi _ ~ -~~ ~ ?~^- ~ __ - R M - -_~-_--_- _-_ - r - - . ~__- t a ." ~ = ---a ' ~ _- _ ~ ~-.iE$ --a _ '1 ~-a5 °°~°O ~ I T- -~~ a 1 h ~ -? -- a''' i ~wgop - - ,- ; k1~B~~ 5 Sf _ ~ ~a.~ ~ C ~4 y ; ~ I~mwamvi W ~~ ~~ pk~ ~I $ - ~ '" ~ ~ ~a... A ~.YJ ~i ~ ~ ~ A q OOO ~ r~ i _ "'~' ~ r M _ _ t1S IluB_ -__ - ---e - R -_ ~ ~ ~'I b+bYats~n~ ir~°' ~„. 3 .~ i ~~, 1' i ~ i i "~ 3 i, .. J~ `" ~ ~;kk-- e .,,~,,,,,;,.,,,-. _ 7G.4F "~` . ~ ~ ~ I J h f-f ?~ ~: 1 -q ~~ f: I I ~ ±y `~ III i_ '~a:eC-Am6n4R= ~ ~ 3 = i~~m 3 ~ ~~ ~{~,~® ~'~ v~ ~'a 'I 7 LL 0 0 Q~ V ^°~ N C O ~ o E O y .~ o ~ ~ V ~~ ~ O `w_ ~ G / ~ O u Z 0 ~~ f~ p .-.a s a~ ~~C3I BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: DRC 2001-00570 and SUBTPM15732 f. J ~1 L._J 2. Related Files• None 3. Description of Project: Environmental Assessment and Development Rewew 2001- 00570 and Tentative Parcel Mao SUBTPM 15730 -The proposed protect is the construction of four mdustnal tilt-up buildings Huth related parking and landscaping on 4.61 acres. Three buildings will be located on a 2 71-acre vacant lot located on the southeast corner of Center Avenue and Effen Street (APN 1077-401-21) and the fourth budding will be located on a 1.90-acre vacant lot located less than 100 feet northeast of the 2.71-acre parcel on the east side of Effen Street. (Note after fuming east onto Effen Street from Center Avenue, Effen Street continues for approximately 235 feet east then turns north The forth building will be located on the east side of this section of Effen Street [see Figure 1, Vicinity Map]). The 2.71-acre lot Hnll include a 9,071 square-foot budding, a 9,060 square-foot budding, and a 28,931 square-foot building. The 1.90-acre lot will include a 40,240 square-foot budding The bwldings will be constructed in accordance with approved plans and will blend with existing structures in the area. End- use of the bwldings will include warehousing/light manufacturing with office space, and will be consistent with permitted uses set forth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Chapter 17.30, Industrial Distracts, Subarea 17, Industrial Park. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: WFConstruction, Inc. 635 West Allen Avenue San Dimas, CA 91729 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 17) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: A portion of the protect (three of the four buildings) will be located on the southeast corner of Center Avenue and Effen Street fust north of Foothill Boulevard This 2 71-acre lot is vacant and was once used as a vineyard. The site is bordered on the east by an existing industrial bwlding; on the north by Effen Street followed by a medical response facility; on the west by Center Avenue followed by residential development, and on the south by an industrial park. The forth building will be located on a 1 90-acre lot located less than 100 feet northeast of the 2 71-acre lot. The site ~s bordered on the west by Effen Street followed by the medical response facility, on the south by an existing mdustnal budding, on the east by Deer Creek Channel, and on the north by an mdustnal budding. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Croic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~C~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Rick Fisher (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 s u ~~. C 3~- I~ s Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, Involving at feast one Impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact,° "Potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,° or'Less Than Signrficant Impact as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Plannm () 9 (/) Transporlation/CirculaLOn ()Public Sernces O Populapon and Housing U Biological Resources O UttlAies and Sernce Systems (/) Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) gesthetics ()Water ()Hazards (/) Noise Cultural Resources () (/) Air Quality i ~ r.~.,..a~•...., r~..a..,......~ c......r.,......... Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation. (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed Na y Ferg is n Contract Pla er February 5, 2002 S~ C 3`J Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the Calrfornia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all °Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,' and °Less Than Signrficant Impact° answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the signrficant effects identrfied. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: va"meq sl~lr~a,~l Ewa it SgnlAcem rvu~um siQdfltent No I q 1 ME I d 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (/) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (/) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the pro/ect~ c) Be incompatible with existing land use In the () () () (/) vicinity d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/) established community? Comments• a-d) The proposed project was designed in accordance with the General Plan's land use designation of Industnal Park which is intended for 'light industrial, research and development businesses, and general and medical office uses.' A portion of the prolect will be located on a 2.71-acre lot located on the southeast comer of Center Avenue and Effen Street The other portion will be located on a 1.90-acre lot located on the north side of Effen Street lust northeast of the 2.71-acre lot. There are existing light Industnal and office uses on surrounding properties. No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no land use impacts will result from the project. ~~~ s l~cau Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polanlblly ~ ~ rl SipMfirsnt Mlipalbn SlpMflranl No 1 C I Ib I p I p 2. POPIA.ATIONANDFfOUSNG. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (/) population prolections~ b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e g., through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator Infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/) housing? ~~ C'Jlo i Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Comments• a-b) Construction actiwties at the sites will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area since there is an existing pool of construction labor in the region. Although future tenants are unknown, similar operation and buildings of this size generally require twenty to forty employees. The addition of these employees will not create a demand for additional housing as they are likely to be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. c) Development of the vacant sites will not impact existing or planned housing vnthm the area as the sites are designated Subarea 17, Industnal Park, and are not proposed for residential development. i Paemmoy s~n~n Issues and Supporting Information Sources: cur i ~ ~ Sipnrxam runpeom sgMabm Mo i a i gee i i 3. GEOLAGIC PROBLE]NS. Wou/d the proposal result ~n or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? () () () (/) b) Seismic ground shakmg~ () () (/) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions () () (/) ( ) d) Seiche hazards () () () (/) e) Landslides or mudflows? () () () (/) f) Erosion, changes m topography, or unstable soil () () () (/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fdl~ g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (/) h) Expansnre sods? O O O (/) i) Unique geologic or physical features? () () () (/) Comments: L J a-c) No known faults pass through the sties and they are not m an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it m the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within two miles northwest of the sties, and the Cucamonga Fauft Zone lies approximately five miles northwest. The magnitude of the maximum probable event along these faults is estimated at moment magnitude (Mw) 6.0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jaanto fault, capable of produang up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes is 13.5 miles northeast of the sites and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeast of the sites. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhenng to the Unrform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant. ~~C 3~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 d) The 2.71-acre site is not located near a body of water. The 1.90-acre site is bordered on the east by Deer Creek Channel. The channel contains water intermittently and would not present a seiche hazard at the site. e) Both sites are relatively flat, therefore there is no danger of landslides or mudflows. f) The protect sites are not located in an area of the City susceptible to liquefaction. Subsidence may occur in the City relative to groundwater withdrawals, if groundwater drawn down is done at varying rates in the Cucamonga groundwater basin. However, to date this phenomenon has not occurred anywhere in the City and is unlikely to occur due to the consistent groundwater management practices of the vanous water agencies. Therefore, this impact is considered to be less than signrficant. g/h) Soil type at the sites and in the viamty is Tuiunga association (TuB). The Tufunga serves consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping sods formed on alluvial fans in grarntic alluvwm. Sods are present at slopes of zero to nine percent in elevations ranging from 1,000 to 2,000 feet. Vegetation present with these soils is thin strands of chamise, some big sagebrush, and annual grasses. Runoff is slow to very slow. The hazard of water erosion is slight, but the sod wdl blow if left unprotected. The hazard of sod blowing is moderate to high on bare sod. The City's General Plan indicates that most sod types in the City are very adaptable to land development and are not of an expansive nature. There are no unique geologic or physical features at neither of the sites. ~.,m~y sgmnom Issues and Supporting Information Sources. caemmoy spvficam Mngsao~ &P.ncvn Mo i n Inca t.e i n i a 4. WATER. Will the proposal result m: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (/) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (/) hazards such as floodmg~ c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/) of surface water quality (e.g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (/) water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/) of water movements i u ~>. c 3 8 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Pdmtlmly si Issues and Supporting Information Sources sa ~ ~ M ~ ~ i a ~ i~ i a i a f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (/) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) h) Impacts to groundwater quality's Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? O U (/) U O (/) O O (/) Comments: a) The protect is expected to result in changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns As proposed in the grading plan, the 2.71-acre site wall include a 36-inch wide V-gutter. The gutter will be constructed in the center of the site and will run from the northern boundary to the southern boundary. Another 36-inch wnde V-gutter will be constructed across the southern boundary. Additionally, two parkway drams will be constructed along Center Avenue -one at the southwest corner of the site and the other approximately 50 feet south of the northwest comer. Drainage structures at the 1.90-acre site wall include a parkway dram on Effen Street. A 36-inch wide V-gutter will be constructed approximately 46 feet south of an existing back wall along the length of the site's northern border. A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and will show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and operation. Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the protect by the Building Official will ensure adequate site drainage and will ensure this impact is less than significant. b) The sites are not located within the 100-year flood plain. c-e) The protect sites are not located near a body of water The applicant will provide a drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed, both dunng grading/construction and once the site is developed and occupied, prior to issuance of a grading permit f-i) The protect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the sites are not used for groundwater recharge. ~~. C 3°I Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 PtMatlielly ~~,I Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pot.,n.llr lip n N SpnMUnt 61rtpe0on siprr6um W 1 p ttd I p I d 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (/) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? () () () (/) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (/) cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones 8 Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unrfied Air Pollution Control District, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects. The cntena pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NO,~, carbon monowde (CO), and particulates (PM,o). Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantrfied to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1). The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6'" edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model. In order to reflect the industrial nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of medium and heavy-duty diesel trucks and decrease the number of light passenger vehicles. The proposed protect operational emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of signrficance (Table 2). However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PMia) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the protect contribution to regional emission of cntena pollutants. During operation exhaust emissions from trucks and employees traveling to the site will increase CO levels in the area. As shown in Table 2, operation activities at the sites will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6"' edition values, the URBEMIS7G model estimates vehicle trips associated with a designated land use. The proposed protect includes a 9,071 square-foot building, 9,060 square-foot building, 28,931 square-foot building and 40,240 square-foot buildings for a total of 87,302 square feet. Based on this square footage and industrial use, the ITE associates a trip rate of 6.30 trips per 1,000 square feet. The proposed protect will generate approximately 550 taps. Traffic associated with the protect was protected to occur in the area as the area is designated Industrial Park and is expected to generate related traffic trips. Emissions associated with operation of the protect are below SCAQMD thresholds of signrficance (Table 2). U u ~,~ Cy o • Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds cer Davl Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet. Mit. Unmrt. Mit. Unmet. Mit. Unmet. Mit. Gradm 3 23 3.23 43.06 40.91 - - 24.24 9.93 Worker Tn s 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Stations E w 0.34 0.34 0.27 0.27 - - 0.02 0.02 Mobile E w 3.12 2.96 28.80 27.36 - - 2.23 2.12 Arch. Coatm s 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - As halt 2 62 2.49 Totals 9 31 8.86 72 14 68 54 0.00 0.00 26.49 12.06 SCAQMDThres. 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si mficance No No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G EXISTING Operations Emissions (Pounds cer Davl Source ROG NO^ CO PM,o Unmet. Mit. Unmet. Met Unmet. Mit Unmet. Mit. Area Source 0.06 0 00 0.81 0 00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0 00 Mobile Source 10.16 10.16 20.29 20.29 90.46 90.46 5.16 5.16 Totals 10 22 10.16 21.10 20.29 90.78 90.46 5 16 5.16 SCAQMDThres. 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds dunng grading activities for PM,o and NO,,, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NO,,. Tables 1 and 2 show protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented. During grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated. Since, there is existing residential development west of the 2.71-acre site, and since the region is ninon-attainment for PM,o, fugitive dust will be mitigated by the following measures: 1. The site shall be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,a emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2. Center Avenue and both portions of Effen Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 'p~~C41 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. b) During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by equipment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NO, and PM,o levels in the area. The following mitigation measures wdl ensure impacts to the existing residential development to the west of the 2.71-acre site are at less than sign'rficant levels. 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed protect is the construction of four industnal building (totaling 87,302 square feet) with adequate parking on both the 2.71-acre lot and 1.90-acre lot. The end use of the protect wdl include warehousing light manufacturing wrath related office space, and wdl not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. aa~wey ski Issues and Supporting Information Sources. aaamvy u~ msa ,`n: 5gnificam ru~Weua, sreMfic+m No i n iiwo .sae i n i a 6. TRANSPORTATIOWCIRCULATION. Would the proposal result m. a) Increased vehicle traps or traffic congestions () () (/) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., () () () (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (/) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-sites () () () (/) e) Hazards or barners for pedestnans or bicyclists? () () () (/) • ~~ C 4a Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 ra.~bny s~n~~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources vw~,nreM ~~ n`: s~r~n Mngenm s~ic.m No i n into yea i a i f) Conflicts with adopted pollees supporting () () () (/) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Red or air traffic impacts () () () (/) Comments• a) Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6'" edition values, the URBEMIS7G model estimates vehicle traps associated with a designated land use. The proposed protect includes a 9,071 square-foot, 9,060 square-foot, 28,931 square-foot and 40,240 square-foot mdustnal bwldmgs. Based on a total of 87,302 square-feet and general mdustnal use, the ITE associates a trap rate of 6.03 taps per 1,000 square feet. Approximately 550 trips will be generated by the proposed protect. The protect sites are vnthm the City's Industrial Distract Subarea 17. The City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of butldmg permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic erculation. In addition, the protect is regwred to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site and employee/customer parking on-site. Compliance with conditions of approval will ensure that protect-related taps are less than signdicant. b-d) Access to the 2.71-acre site will be provided by two, 35-foot driveways on the east/west portion of Ellen Street and access to the 1.90-acre site will be provided by one, 45-foot driveway on the north/south portion of Ellen Street. Ellen Street will direct traffic from Center Avenue and eliminate the stacking of vehicles. Driveways on both portions of Ellen Street v~nll allow full access without impeding the through traffic. Access for emergency vehicles are adequate with two, 35-foot driveways and one, 45-foot driveway. e-f) According to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit III-13 °Hikmg and Riding Trails Master Plan,° the Regional Multi-Purpose trail along the adfommg flood control channel property does not cross at any point within the protect area and therefore is not impacted. g) Located 3.0 miles north of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft C~ ~~C43 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 PgBrIImOy S nificanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pgantlelly p IUnl~ac m~.n Spnlfiunl MHipatlm SpMfxant No 1 q Inco tetl I I q 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result rn rmpacts to• a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (/) habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, () () () (/) eucalyptus windrow, etc.) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., () () () (/) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, npanan, and () () () (/) venial pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? () () () (/) Comments• a) The sites and surrounding area is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identrfied within Figure 6 of the US Fish & Wildlrfe Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997. The 2 71-acre site is vacant and was one used as a vineyard. Past agricultural activities have eliminated native vegetation at this site. Property surrounding the 2.71-acre site is developed with mdustnal or residential uses. Additionally, the 1.90-acre site, although it does not appear to have been used for agricultural purposes, does not contain signrficant amounts of native vegetation (only scattered remnants of native grasses were present on this parcel). Property surrounding this parcel is developed and does not contain adequate habitat for any endangered or threatened species. b-c) The proposed protect will not require the removal of any mature trees or other locally designated natural communities d) There is no npanan or wetland habitat at neither of the sites. e) Both lots are surrounded by mdustnal development (with the exception of residential development that occurs west of the 2.71-acre site). Surrounding development including Center Avenue, has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past. ~,~ C 4`{ r~ I~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 aa«rcboy stem Issues and Supporting Information Sources P01 ~ M u s I nlpe oan s m ra I q _ _ Inmr~aeled_ Impep _ Ilipd 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal. a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments• a-b) The protect will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation c) Both protect sites are located on the Deer Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. Pas~nspy apnMCem Issues and Supporting Information Sources. PoIM~yEy Impscl unbss Lus .n.~ Sgnifiunl 1Mtgstan sal No I d I ale0 I a I q 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal rnvo/ve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () ( ) () (/) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () ( ) () (/) response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () ( ) () (/) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (/) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (/) . brush, grass, or trees? ~£C ~}5 t Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 Comments• City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 a/c) Both sites are vacant and contain minimal amounts of household debns (paper/aluminum cans). The debns are non-hazardous and do not pose a threat to the development of the site. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils was observed Development of the project sites will not expose people or the environment to any known hazardous materials. b) Two, 35-foot driveways on Effen Street will provide adequate access for emergency vehicles for the 2.71-acre site. The 1.90-acre site will contain one, 45-foot driveway on Effen Street. Fire hose locations will be approved per Fire Department. All terminating streets on-site provide appropriate tum radws for emergency vehicles. d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored sods was observed onsite. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. e) Development of the sites will remove dry vegetation and continued development of the area will decrease the potential of fire within the vianity. The sites are located in an industrial area and are not located in a brush/wddland fire hazard area. VolwhieEy s~~v~,rc Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pw.M~ly SpNfiGnl MIIgaOan $puficenl No 1 q uE I a I d 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result m: a) Increases in existing noise levels () () () (/) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () () (/) Comments• a-b) The proposed protect includes the construction of four industrial buildings -three to be construction on a 2.71-acre lot and one budding to be constructed on a 1 90-acre lot. The 2 71-acre lot will contain a 9,071 square-foot, 9,060 square-foot and 28,931 square-foot building, and the 1.90-acre lot will contain a 40,240 square-foot budding. The total square footage of the protect is 87,302 square feet. Surrouriding land uses at both of the sites is industrial, with the exception of residential development that occurs west of the 2.71-acre site. Site activities will include warehousing/light manufacturing with related office space. The proposed protect will generate approximately 550 trips. The addition of 550 taps will not significantly increase noise in the area. Site activities will occur in the center of the 2.71-acre site between the buildings. Proposed activities will be located over 250 feet from existing residential development to the west. The 9,071 square-foot budding will be located along Center Street and will create a shield for existing residential development to the west The 1.90-acre site is located over 450 feet northeast of the residential development with proposed activities occurring over 800 feet away. Noise will be consistent with existing levels in the vanity. • ~~ C 4 (o i Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 PdedmOy SI~Y(K211i Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pdmwuy rune sWSrad rarc,ped~n sp.r~n No iced Incdporated Impact Inged 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services m any of the following areas: a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () () (/) e) Other governmental services? () () () (/) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The prolect area is served by a fire station located on San Bernardino Road, approximately 1 mile to the west, and by a fire station on the southwest corner of Jersey and Milliken, approximately two miles southeast of the prolect area. Standard conditions of approval from the Unrforrn Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect. The impact is not considered signrficant. Police Protection -Additional police protection is not required as the prolect sites are within an area that is developed and is currently patrolled The addition of three industrial buildings on the 2.71-acre lot and one industrial building on the 1.90-acre lot will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled. Schools -Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new lob opportunities or induce people to move to the prolect area. Future tenants and required employees is currently unknown. However, buildings of similar size and use within the City have required between 20 and 40 employees. Additionally, similar operations have hired approximately 80 percent of the employees from within the City with remaining employees hired from surrounding communities. Therefore, construction/operation activities will not adversely impact local schools. Parks -Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new lob opportunities or induce people to move to the prolect area. Future tenants and regwred employees are currently unknown. However, buildings of similar size and use within the City have required between 20 and 40 employees. Additionally, similar operations have hired approximately 80 percent of the employees from within the City with remaining employees hired from surrounding communities. Therefore, constructioNoperation activities will not adversely impact local or regional parks. Public facilities -The proposed prolect will generate approximately 550 vehicle taps. The applicant of this prolect will pay afair-share of the cost of local road improvements, through the City's Transportation Development Fee. $ ~ c 4'1 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 vwelnmuy s~ llr~m Issues and Supporting Information Sources• vaemmnr Q ~a r`n"ee SpdtceM Mngetlm Siprufira,tl No I h I,rco lae I h 1 d 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result m a need for new systems or supplies or substantial a/terat~ons to the following uttl~ties: a) Power or natural gas? () () () (/) b) Communication systems? O O O (/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (/) facihties~ d) Sewer or septic tanks? () () () (/) e) Storm water drainage? () () () (/) f) Solid waste disposal? () () () (/) g) Local or regional water supplies? () () () (/) Comments: a-g) The protect will use existing gas, electrical and communication systems currently serving the area. The current City contracted hauler wall provide solid waste disposal. The prolect will increase demand upon storm dram systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape proposed on the currently vacant sites. However, the industrial area has been developed with infrastructure to support development. The prolect includes the construction of appropriate stormwater drainage facilities per approved grading and drainage plan. Therefore, the impact is not considered signrficant. Polembny spe~rka~l Issues and Su g pportln Information Sources. vol.nlely Impea uebu "" ,,,ee Sgniflcenl Mdpetlm Sipiincanl No I d I led I h 1 q 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? () () () (/) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? () () () (/) c) Create light or glares () () () (/) Comments• a-b) The prolect site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway. The site is within the Subarea 17, Industrial Park District as described in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Chapter 1730 Industrial Districts. The 2.71-acre site is vacant with only remnants of a vineyard remaining on the east portion of the site. The 190-acre site is also vacant and contains nonnative vegetation Properties surrounding both lots are developed with industrial uses with the exception of the L_~ ~, ~ C 48 Irntial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 property west of the 2.71-acre lot that contains residential development The proposed warehouse will blend with existing buildings m the vicinity and will setback 35 feet from the property Ime. The setback will contain six, 24-inch box trees and one, 15-inch box tree. The trees will be evenly spaced within the 180-foot by 35-foot space and will provide shielding of the buildings from existing residents located over 100 feet to the west. Additionally, the extenor of the buildings will appear more like an office building, with windows and a public entrance, than an mdustnal building, with minimal windows and architectural features. The proposed protect will develop the site with adequate setbacks and landscaping, and remove the presence of weeds and scattered debns. c) The proposed protect is the construction of four mdustnal buildings totaling 87,302 square-foot. Construction of the buildings Hell create a new light source at both sites as both are currently vacant. The impact ~s not considered significant as surrounding properties are developed vnth similar structures. • Pa.mnuy spusc.~c Issues and Supporting Information Sources va.mreoy ~i ~ sv.rr:m ruowna, ski w i a i roe i a ~ 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Wou/d the proposal. a) Disturb Paleontological resources? () () () (/) b) Disturb archaeological resources? () () () (/) c) Affect histoncal or cultural resources? () () () (/) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses wdhm O O O (/) the potential impact area Comments• a-e) The proposed protect is the construction of three industrial buildings on a 2.71-acre lot and one mdustnal bwldmg on a 1 90-acre lot. Both sites are vacant with the presence of past agncultural activity evident on the 2.71-acre lot. Development of the surrounding area has not revealed the present of cultural resources and rt is unlikely any resources will be discovered dunng construction activities. Therefore, development of the sites will not impact any known cultural resources. Paarcieny s~i ' Issues and Supporting Information Sources va.m.oy a w : in.~ s~ymr~m wupsum siWnam~ w ~ a i lea i a i a 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational faalities~ U U O (/) C y' I I Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 vgenwoy slp~rwam Issues and Supporting Information Sources: va.mlely ~q Siglgcent Miepelpn SipnMCant No I q Imp teC I q Im q b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? () () () (/) Comments• a) Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new fob opportunities or induce people to move to the protect area. Future tenants and required employees are currently unknown. However, buildings of similar size and use within the City have required between 20 and 40 employees. Additionally, similar operations have hired approximately 80 percent of the employees from within the City vwth remaining employees hired from surrounding communities Therefore, constructioNoperation activities will not increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks. b) The protect would not affect existing recreational opportunities as both sites are within the Industrial Park District and are surrounded by industrial and residential development. Pmentklly SlptlfinM Issues and Supporting Information Sources vot~ntmur un~i,mq `rne' SpiMwnt MIIIp9tlm SpNfiunt No 1 q I IBE I q I q 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below seH-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential to achieve short-tens, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively beef, defmitrve period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) (/) (/) ~£C~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00570 Cary of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Pdedally Sr Ylranl Issues and Supporting Information Sources• PdemmeY p lu°°i.,° T"n,"„ Spnficent MRpadm Sprnficenl No I d Inca Ib 1 d I d c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that () () () (/) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (°Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The sites and surrounding area is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identfied within Figure 6 of the US Fish & Wrfdlrfe Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997. The 2.71-acre site is vacant and was one used as a vineyard. Past agncultural activities have eliminated native vegetation at this site Property surrounding the 2.71-acre site is developed with industrial or residential uses. Additionally, the 1.90-acre site does not contain past evidence of agncultural activities and does not contain significant amounts of native vegetation (only scattered remnants of native grasses were present on this parcel). Property surrounding this parcel is developed and does not contain adequate habitat for any endangered or threatened species. b) The protect does not sacrrfice long-term environmental goals to achieve short-term environmental obtectives. Project related impacts identified in the Initial Study are related to grading/construction and can be mitigated to less than significant levels. c) The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certrfication of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for signrficant adverse environmental effects of buildout in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however they would not reduce impacts to less than signficant levels. As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the signficant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. ~~C51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00570 Page 20 With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred. d) The construction of three industrial bwldings on a 2 71-acre site and one building on a 1.90-acre site would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly. The initial study did not identrfy any impacts that would have a potentially signrficant affect to the environment. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identrfied above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (June 2001) Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (adopted December 7, 1983, revised June 1999) United States Fish & Wildlife, Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly, Figure 6, September 14, 1997. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature: ~ Date 2 ' ~`/ UZ. Print Name and Title: • u ~~ C 5a Feb 06'02 04:41p OWFsPROPERTYyMRHRGEMEI'1T^ 909 599 5763 Fax' Feb 6 '02 14:54 P. OS • Vim' '_F*~I City ofReacho Cucamonga l OS00 C1vic Center Onve Rancho Cuannouga. CA 91729 Attn Nancy Fong Re Lots 1;, 12 and 13 CatnllalDorsca Avctwe Rancho Cucamonga Dcar Nancy, February 5, 2002 V wt Fex (~9) an-zsa~ I was asked to waste this letter on behalf of the seller ro explata the ptnoess of closing one extsung driveway on our lot 11 and t»stallmg a new driveway approach For Lot 12 Additionally, we have submitted a snc plan showutg the exlsung proposed dnveway approaches for both Lot 11 and 12 as you requacted Currently we have a temporary dnvtway approach and temporary parking lat on Lot 11 that will be removed as part of our new development Our teller Btu Angel, who also owoc the vacant bu(ldiag on Lot l2 WJI be rrsponstble for the re-conetrucnon of the driveway approach for Lot 12 upon close of our escrow to allow for traffic flow back tmo h1s parluag lot I have asked Bell to ttgn this letter to show hts approval of our outline to ransfy these dnveway issues If you have any questions for Btll Angel he caa be reached at (909) 989-7026 or myself 1 pit be reached at (909) 599-4262 ext 230 Sincerely, f~ i ~~.i Sill For President - WF Conswcnon, Inc Cc lodd Launchbaugh Cc Ron Basante BP/tin Slttct~rdnyr Uv I_ RBnchoPaafic eloptneat Btll Artgd WF Con+truetlen, Irc 635 W Allsn Ave Ssn dmus CNtl 91773 (909) 599-4252 Fq7( (gag) s9gaeaa T'd E9LS 66S 606 1N3N39HNHN A1M3dU2(d ~1'I ~C~g~T `'1'' ~~C53 d45 rE0 20 90 Aid p.l February 28, 2002 pR.~ Bin Fox For piscuss'O~' ~ Foy GIs WRAF W F Construction ~ussion p T 635 W. Allen Avenue urp, San Dimas, CA 91773 SUBJECT: DRC2001-00570 - 4 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS Dear Mr. Fox• The Development Rewew process for the above-descnbed protect has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this review process. Facts. The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Center Avenue and Ellen Street with a street frontage of 1,130 feet and a lot depth of 290 feet and is presently vacant 2. The properties to the north and the south of the subtect site are developed with mdustnal buildings, the property to the east is an existing flood control channel and commercial centers, and the properties to the west are single-family homes. 3 The design of the proposed protect complies with the Development Standards and Design Guidelines of the Development Code 4. The site will contain sufficient parking spaces to accommodate the proposed protect 5 The construction of the protect wtll not have a significant impact to the environment. Findmas. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan The proposed protect is m accordance with the obtectrves of the Development Code and the purpose of the distract m which the site is located. 3. The proposed protect, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially mtunous to properties or improvements in the wcmity 4 The proposed protect will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code BILL FOX - W.F CONSTRUCTION DRC2001-00570 February 28, 2002 Page 2 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written reports included forthe environmental assessment forthe application, the City Planner finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the Califoma Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelmes promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Planner; and, further, the City Planner has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califoma Code of Regulations, the City Plannerfinds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negatwe Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Planner during the public hearing, the City Planner hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Conditions. This protect is approved subtect to the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions• Planning Division 1) Provide special landscaping treatment such as, increase number of trees, specimen size trees, undulating mounding along Center Avenue. 2) Provide hedgerow consisting of 5-gallon size shrubs planted at 3 feet on center along those parking spaces that front on to Dorset Street and Center Avenue 3) Place roof equipment within the roof area above the office portion of the bwldmg. Place roof equipment outside, if the designated area will be required to install new roof screen wall as detailed on the plans The exterior surface of the new roof screen wall shall match the tilt-up concrete surface ~~C55 BILL FOX - W F. CONSTRUCTION DRC2001-00570 February 28, 2002 Page 3 ' 4) Construct a 6-foot high decorative block wall along the east property line of Building D. The wall wdl begin at the north property Ime and terminate at the trash enclosure A 6-foot high wrought fence will begin at the trash enclosure and terminate at the south property line 5) Treat the plaza/lunch area with pedestrian furniture such as, patio fumture, bike racks, tree wells, and landscape area 6) Prior to issuance of a bwldmg permit, a Minor Development Review application shall be submitted to show the reconstruction of the abandoned driveway, which is the required access for the adjacent parcel east of the proposed Bwiding C The driveway shall be completed prior to the construction of the site. 7) Street names for the private streets shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of a bwldmg permit. 8) Install street name signs for both streets Enomeenng Division• 1) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Center Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of DorseUEffen Street (east of Center Avenue) to the south project boundary 2) For both SUBTPM15732 and Lot 13 of Tract No 11428, complete all missing street improvements along Center Avenue, and the private streets (DorseUEfffen Street, and Cartdla Avenue) frontage, mcludmg street trees, commercial drive approach(s) per City Standard Plan 101, Type C, new streetlight(s), sidewalk and R26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs, painted traffic striping and signage shall be installed or replaced as regwred Protect existing curb and gutter, R26(s) signs and other public improvements, mcludmg drainage improvements or replace as regwred a Provde (2) 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights along Center Avenue b. Provide (2) 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights along private street (Dorset Street) c. Provide (2) 5800 Lumen HPSV streetlights along private street (Cartdla Avenue) d Remove the existing drive approach at the southerly side of the intersection of DorseUEffen Streets, and Cartdla Avenue, within the street knuckle curve, and replace it with curb and gutter BILL FOX - W F CONSTRUCTION DRC2001-00570 • February 28, 2002 Page 4 e. Where curb adjacent sidewalk is allowed, it shall be ADA compliant. Provide sidewalk easements and wrap sidewalks around dnve approaches to meet ADA regwrements Sidewalk on Center Avenue and the sidewalk to the west of the westerly dnve approach on DorseUEffen Streets shall be property line adjacent. g. First 6 feet of driveways sloping away from the back of sidewalk shall be no steeper than 6 percent h. Revise City Drawing No 725 to add parkway improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer, for conformance with adopted policy, shall rewew driveway line of sight designs for all driveway locations. Line of sight design shall be plotted on the Grading and the Landscape Plans Landscape mounds, berms, slopes, walls, trees, and similar items shall be located outside the driveway lines of sight. Environmental Mitigation• Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,oemissions, in accordance with SCAQMD, Rule 302. 2) Center Avenue and both portions of DorseUEffen Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM 10 emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) Contractor shall select the construction equipment based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency All construction . egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 6) Contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible ~, ~. c 5"1 I BILL FOX - W.F CONSTRUCTION DRC2001-00570 February 28, 2002 Page 5 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not m use. Please note that conditions may speafy completion of certain plans or work pnor to issuance of bwlding permits This decision shall be final following a 10-day appeal penod beginning with the date of this letter. Appeals must be fled m wntmg with the Planning Commission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be accompanied by a $62 appeal fee. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact the protect planner, Rick Fisher, Contract Planner, at (909) 477-2750. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF/tc Attachment• Standard Conditions cc. Rosalyn Interlicchica, Office Spec. II, Fire Safety Dan James, Senior Cml Engineer r1 U C J ~~. C 58 City of Rancho,Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLAMATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Aet Section 21091 and 21092 0/the Public Resources Code Project File No.: DRC 2001-00570 and Public Review Period Closes: February 20, 2002 SUBTPM15732 Project Name: DRC 2001-00570 and Project Applicant: WF Construction, Inc SUBTPM15732 635 West Allen Avenue San Dimas, CA 91729 Project Location (also see attached map): A portion of the prolect (three of the four bwldings) will be located on the southeast comer of Center Avenue and Effen Street lust north of Foothill Boulevard. The forth buldng will be located on a 1.90-acre lot located less than 100 feet northeast of the 2.71-acre lot Project Description: The proposed prolect is the construction of four industrial tilt-up buildings with related parking and landscaping on 4.61 acres Three bwldings will be located on a 2.71-acre vacant lot located on the southeast comer of Center Avenue and Effen Street (APN 1077-401-21) and the fourth budding Nnll be located on a 190-acre vacant lot located less than 100 feet northeast of the 2.71-acre parcel on the east side of Effen Street (Note after fuming east onto Effen Street from Center Avenue, Effen Street continues for approximately 235 feet east then turns north. The forth building will be located on the east side of this section of Effen Street [see Figure 1, Vianity Map]). The 2 71-acre lot will include a 9,071 square-foot bwlding, a 9,060 square-foot budding, and a 28,931 square-foot budding The 1.90-acre lot will include a 40,240 square- foot budding The buildings will be constructed in accordance with approved plans and will blend with existing structures in the area. End-use of the buildings will include warehousing/light manufacturing wdh office space, and will be consistent with permitted uses set forth m the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Chapter 17.30, Industrial Districts, Subarea 17, Industrial Park. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine ff the project may have a signfficant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Imtial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the prolect may have a signrficant effect on the environment. ~ The Initial Study identified potentially signrficant effects but• (1) Revisions in the prolect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signrficant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the prolect as revised may have a signrficant effect on the environment. H adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. ~~C5q Date of Determination Adopted By S RESOLUTION NO 02-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15732, A SUBDIVISION OF 2 71 ACRES OF LAND INTO 3 PARCELS IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 17), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CENTER AVENUE AND EFFEN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-401-21. A Rentals 1. W F Construction, Inc., fled an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15732, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of February 2002, the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on February 27, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Center Avenue and Effen Street, and at the east side of Cartilla Street with a street frontage of 840 feet and a lot depth of 290 feet and is presently vacant, and b The properties to the north and the south of the subtect site are developed with mdustnal bwldmgs, the property to the east is an existing flood control channel and commercial centers, and the properties to the west are single-family homes, and c The design of the proposed protect complies with the Development Standards and Design Gwdelmes of the Development Code, and d The site will contain sufficient parking spaces to accommodate the proposed protect, and e The construction of the protect will not have a significant impact to the environment ~ C l00 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-31 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15732 February 27, 2002 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a. That the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans, and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable mtury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serous public health problems; and f The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdvision. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission fmds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the . Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect asset forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ~ 13fClol PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-31 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15732 February 27, 2002 Page 3 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plamm~q Division: 1) Pnor to issuance of a building permit for Budding C, a Minor Development Rewew application shall be submitted to show the re- construction of the abandoned dnveway, which is the required access for the adjacent parcel (Lot 12 of Tract_ No 11428) east of the proposed Building C The dnveway shall be completed pnor to the construction of the site. 2) Reciprocal access, parking, and landscaping maintenance is requred. 3) All Conditions of Approval and environmental mitigation for DRC2001-00570 shall apply 4) Install street name signs for both streets Engmeenno Division 1) All Conditions of Approval for DRC2001-00570 shall apply Environmental Mitiaation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, m accordance with SCAOMD, Rule 302 2) Center Avenue and both portions of DorseUEffen Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM,oemissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions • 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 3~cc~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-31 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15732 February 27, 2002 , Page 4 6) The construction contractorshallutdizeelectncorcleanaltemativefuel powered egwpment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off equipment when not m use. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST . Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~c (03 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15732 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Enwronmental Impact Report for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 g~cln~- Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTPM15732 - W F CONSTRUCTION February 27, 2002 • Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and prowde appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department wdl approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue regwnng no further monitoring wdl be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unantiapated cvcumstances may arse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented S. Any conditions (mitigation) that require momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. In those instances requmng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall prowde the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits i ~3~C~S MITIGATION MONITORING CHEC Project Fil~.: DRC2001-0057() / SIIRTPMI ~~z~ e.,..r..e.. ~ST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) W.F. Construction Inc. Initial Study Prepared by: Nancy Ferguson Date: February 5. 2002 ., , - -, .. - Air Quality The site shall be treated with wate th r or o er sod stabilizing CP C Review of l agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) dally to reduce p ans A/C 2 PMro emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Center Avenue and both portions of Effen Street shall be CP C swept according to a schedule established by the Clty to Review of plans A/C 2 reduce PMto emissons associated wdh vehicle tracking of sod off-sde Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds CP C exceed 25 mph to minimize PMro emissions from the site Review of plans A/C 2 during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas CP C Review of plans A/C 2 that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM to missions he construction contractor shall select the construction CP B/C Review of plans A/C quipment used on-site based on low emission factors and 2 high-energy efficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specfications The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean l CP B/C Review of plans A/C a ternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 2 The construction contractor shall ensure that construction- CP/CE B Review of plans C grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut 2 off equipment when not in use Ke to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ~ MonltorPng Frequency ~ McMOd or verlnosticn ° . sahoilone ~ ~ r - CDD -Community Development Duector A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection CP -City Planner or designee B -Prior To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map 2 W CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check - ithhold Grading or Building Permit BO -Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy 4 -St W k PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating op or Order FC -Fire Chief or designee 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00570 AND SUBTPM15732 SUBJECT: 4 INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 92,802 SQUARE FEET APPLICANT: WF CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: SEC OF CENTER AVENUE AND EFFEN STREET AND EAST SIDE OF CARTILLA STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval 2 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed Completion Date -/-~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-01-02 1 ~`-' ~ C Project No DRC2001-00570 8 SUBTPM15732 Completion Date Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Droision, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Bwlding Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection Distract and the Bwlding and Safety Drvision to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and bulding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval m the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wdh all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of bulding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are regwred and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 All ground-mounted uhlity appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 11 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proot of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of bulding permits 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the prolect perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's perimeter SC-01-02 2 ~ £ C -/___/_ ~-/_ ~-/_ ___/~- -/-/- ~-/_ -/-/- _/-/. -/-/ ~_/. -/-/- -/-/- / / Protect No DRC2001-00570 8 SUBTPM15732 Completion Date D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans 2 For commercal and industrial prolects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a bulding, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adfacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way 6 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 7 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet 8 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential prolects or more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces regwred are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces regwred exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the bulding shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision -/-/- ~~- -/~- ~_/- ~~_ ~_/- -/-/- • -/-/- ~-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-01-02 3 IJ~ C ~~ Protect No DRC2001-00570 & SUBTPM15732 Comolehon Date 2 A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office prolects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger 3 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of bulding 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage ~8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs H. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be requred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit -/-/- ~-/_ -/-/- -/-/- ~~- -/-/- ~-/_ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- SC-01-02 q 6£ C ?O Protect No DRC2001-00570 8 SU8TPM75732 Completion Date I. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and locatton / / of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for _ _ mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system locatton, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/~_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/~_ the City prior to permit issuance 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Bulding and Safety Division K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (t a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Bwlding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition _/_/_ to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Dvision prior to permit tssuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bulding Official, after tracUparcel map recordation and _/_/_ prior to issuance of bwiding permits SC-01-02 5 ~~ C ~ I Protect No DRC2001-00570 8 SUBTPM15732 Comoletion Date 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Droision's public counter) 6 The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area a Provide a reduced site plan (8'/z" x 11 ") which indicates the non-buildable easement b Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of aNon-Buildable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s) L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Bulding Code for requred occupancy separation(s) 3 Provide draft stops to attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating to accordance with UBC Table 5-A 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 6 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906 7 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional regwrements may be needed Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Bulding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access .1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 33 total feet on Center Avenue 2 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards -7 SC-01-02 6 6 ~ C / a -~-~- ~-~. -~-~- ~-~_ -~-~- -~-~- / / / / / / -~-~- -~-~ -~-~ -~-~- -~-~ -/_/ -~-~ -~-~- -~-~- Protect No DRC2001-00570 & SUBTPM75732 Completion Date O. Street Improvements 1 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter AC Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr Street Lights SVeet Trees Comm Trell Median Island Bike Trail Other Center Avenue X X X e DorseUEffen Street X X X X Cartllla Avenue X X X X Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Curbside dram outlet on Center Avenue 2 Improvement Plans and Construction a. Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the Clty Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertormed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Puil boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per city Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check _/_/_ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -/~- -~-~- / / -~-~- / / • SC-01-02 7 ~~ C Prgect No DRC2007-0057 0 & SUBTPM75732 Completion Date 3 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program _ _ _ 4 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with /~ adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect _ _ intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as regwred P. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding _ _ _ permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Q. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, ~_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (ail underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/~_ Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/~_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any regwrements that may be received from them R. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/~_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-toot candle power _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 Ail bwldings shall have mammal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _ _/_/_ Security Hardware 1 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within _/_/_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/_/_ sc-ol-oz 8 13 F C ~ 4- Protect No DRC2001-00570 8 SUBTPM75732 Comoleeon Date U. Security Fencing 1 All businesses or residential communities with security Penang and gates will provide the police _/_/_ with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 V. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/~_ wsibdity 2 Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development They shall be ~_/_ a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED sc-ot-o2 9 [3~ CIS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0534 PROJECT#: DRC2001-00570SUBTPM15732 PROJECT NAME: WF Construction DATE: January 15, 2002 PLAN TYPE: CommerciaVlndustrial APPLICANT NAME: WF Construction OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group S FLOOR AREA (S): Bldq A- 9071 s f., B-9060 s.f C-28 931 s f D-40 240 s f LOCATION: A/B/C-SEC Dorset & Center D-Cartdla & Effen FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locate, Fire Protection Plamm~g Speaalist • PLANNER: Rick Fisher ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL C ONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The Technical Review is normally the second stage in the Development Review process involving Fire District review The following conditions of approval were identified in the initial prolect revew and have not been addressed by the applicant Although we have tried, not all Fire District requirements for the proposed prolect may be included Additions to or changes m the prolect may result in additional or changed Fire Distract regwrements Please make the necessary changes or corrections pnor to resubmitting for revew "Bold" items identified below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Planning Diwsion to obtain Fve District approval If your prolect is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an aooointment to verify compliance A. Outstanding Fire Distract Issues 1 Required Note This prolect has outstanding unpaid service fees in the amount of $214 that are due and payable at this time Please remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire District B. Community Facilities Distracts 2 Regwred Note: The prolect is located within a "Mello-Roos" Community Facilities District for fire protection • services C. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Prior to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire rDi-strict and the W ater Distract ~~ C ~~!' 2 Pnor to the issuance of any bulding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards Contac the Fire Safety Division for a copy of "Fire Distract Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 3 When any portion of a facility or bulding is located more than 150-feet from'a fire hydrant located on public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight 4 Required Note: The requred fire flow for this project shall be 2250 for Bldas A/B/C and 2750 for Bldg D gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended For planning purposes one fire hydrant is regwred per 1000 gallons of regwred fire flow NOTE If recwred fire flow cannot be provided for the prolect all structures Fire Distract approved mitigation is required 5 Required Note: The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended 6 Public fire hydrants located with a 500-foot radws of the proposed may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire Distract review and approval Private fue hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow 7 All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bulding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division 8 All private on-sde fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The builder/developer shall submd final test report to the Fire Safety Division 9 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the budder/developer in the presence of the Water Distract or Fve Construction Services, as appropriate Th bulder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Drvis~on 10 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for rewew and approval Include main size 11 Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval 12 If the system is pnvate the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the bwlding permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, that shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 13 Required Note Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation o/ Re/lective Hydrant Markers " On pnvate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner D. Water Availability 1 Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract Water Availabdrtv for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow ~~ C11 E. Automatic Fve Spunkier Systems 1 Required Note: RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard, regwres an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed throughout the building(s) 2 Required Note Ali commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, atl Group A or E Occupances with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, multi-family residential structures, and all structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fve sprinkler system 3 Plans for the regwred automatic fve sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fve Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permit 4 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 5 The fve sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fve sprinkler system Monitoring is regwred with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies F. Fire Access 1 Required Note: Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every faality, budding, or portion of a bwldmg constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the bwldmg is located more than 150-feet from an approved fve district vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the faality or bwldmg 2 Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes 3 Roadways and Fire Lanes- Required Note: Prior to issuance of any grading permds, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets and courts from the Fire Distract in consultation wdh the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150-feet or when otherwise regwred Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other moddications in fire lanes or access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division 4 Knox Rapid Entry System A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specrf~c details and ordering information 5 Required Note: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inchesfrom the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles 6 A bwldmg or site directory shall be regwred, as noted below Lighted directory within 20-feet of main entrance(s) to the site 7 Required Note Emergency access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards 8 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a bwldmg permd, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for regwred Fire District access roadways less than 40-feet in width When fire lanes are regwred the plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 9 Fire Lanes Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fve lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fve lanes ~ ~ C ~~ 10 New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bulding setback exceeds 200-feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance ~ 11. In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identificatioh letters shall be provided o~ the front and back of all units, suites, or bwldings The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga G. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be In place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. H. Building Use Letter 1 Prior to the issuance of any bwlding permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed letter of intended use for each bwlding on-site to the Fve District for review and approval A form that may be used to meet this requvement ~ attached at the end of the Fire District comments I. Fire Distract Service Fees' 1 The following fees may be applicable to this project and are being identified at this time to assist the appllcent in planning for future costs. Other comments in this letter identity fire protection features or other required installations subject to approval by the Fire District The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted. When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division " r $82 Start-up Fee for commercial, industrial or muRi-family dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Fire District Review of Tractor Pamel Maps other than Single-family Residential Tract $132 for W ater Plan Review for Public Fire Protection $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new building) for New Commercial and Industrial Development " Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division ' Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 2 The following service fees are due to the Fire District and payable at this time: $62 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial or multi-family dwelling units (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Fire District Review of Tract or Parcel Maps other than Single-family Residential Tract $ 214 -Total due at this time. Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire District." " Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division 'Note: Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of to improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingushing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 13~ c ~`i J. Hazard Control Permits 1 As noted below Special Permits may be regwred, dependent upon approved use(s) • a General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not Specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fve Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property b. To install any access control dewce, system, or any material under, upon or within the regwred fire district access roadway This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming dewce, speed bump, speed hump or any dewce that delays or slows Fire District response c High piled combustible storage K. Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions requre that the San Bernardino County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 2 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated 3 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pestiades, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount - 4 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount 5 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (FRS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355 6 Any business subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade requirements To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agenaes Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this regwrement, however, EPCRA does require full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory 7 Any business that handles radioactwe material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Bwiding and Safety wdl not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new faality Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance 9 Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner (3 ~ c b'0 10 The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requiring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at faalities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fve District after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department . In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be ~egwred in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs L. Plan Submittal Regwred Notice 1 Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Gwdelines and Standards NOTE In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans Fire Distract Conditions of Approval- Template SL 11/20/01Rewsion L J 6~cXl ANCHO CUCAMONCA Staff Report DATE February 27, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Douglas Fenn, MPA, Associate Planner SUBJECT. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15665 -PARAGON DEVELOPMENT CORP -The proposed subdivision of 33 77 acres into 4 parcels In the General Industnal Distnct (Subarea 14), located north of the terminus of Santa Amts Avenue, east of Day Creek Channel - APN 229-283-48 Related Flle PrellminaryRevlew 00-10. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Sun'oundino Land Use and Zonina• North - Vacant land and ewsting industrial building, General Industnal (Subarea 14) South - Vacant land and ewsting Industnal buildings, General Industnal (Subarea 14) East - Vacant land, General Industnal (Subarea 14) West - Vacant land and ewsting Industnal building, General Industnal (Subarea 14) B General Plan Desionations Protect Site -General Industnal North - Generallndustnal South - General Industnal East - Generallndustnal West - General Industnal and Flood ControllUtilltyComdor C. Site Charactenstics The property Is generally level and slopes slightly from north to south at approximately a 2 percent grade. The site is vacant, and contains naLve vegetation, however, there are no mature trees ANALYSIS: A General The proposed protect is to subdivide the Tentative Parcel Map of 33 77 acres into 4 parcels ranging in size from 3 11 to 12 74 acres The proposed parcel sizes are in compliance with the Development Code The applicant also submitted a master plan to depict an example of how Industnal development could occur on the parcels (Exhibit "C"),and how Santa Anita Avenue would ultimately be extended to loop around and connect to Hyssop Dnve (Exhibit "D") This protect would complete the "missing link" of 6th Street ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TPM15665 -PARAGON DEVELOPMENT CORP. February 27, 2002 Page 2 ' B. Grading and Technical Committees The Grading Committee recommended approval at its meeting on January 15, 2002 The Technical Committee meeting was held on January 16, 2002, and determined that, with the recommended standard and speaal conditions of approval, the project is consistent with City standards and ordinances. C. Environmental Assessment: The application is categoncally exempt pursuant to Section 15315, Class 15, Minor Land Division, of the California Environmental Quality Act. CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng m the Inland Vallev Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tenta~ve Parcel Map 15665 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respecttull submitted, Brad B er City Planner BB:DF/ma Attachments• Exhibit °A° -Site Utilization Map Exhibit °B° -Tentative Parcel Map 15665 Exhibit °C° -Master Plan Exhibit'D" - Circulation Plan Draft Resolution of Approval with Conditions ~~ • a a a a a Z W ° O ~ ~ ~ a a~~ N° r~ ~ O; ~ QZ~ ~ Z N W I~ Y p5 - -~~ ~ ~ ~~ IVY _ (WR~OILY ~ ~.~ WNTlM1Y .~~1 N AA ~3 4F 1. V/J~33Lij 31_~Y15Li3LVl -~- s~~ ,Ip _ _-~ ~A'e ~ ~IF ~~1. B G _A Y { e 69 ~~~ ~ ~ i lq ~y0 WiG®M1Y LF' A~YI ~IVI lllltlS~ MEGRO N1Y 11T YA . Al OKI E~ ~~~~ ~~~~ r ~i a s E ~ 1 -_ i` " ~Q ~ ! IA ~ {~ _ EI E . i • , ~ ui gg ! . o FFE~ d € ~2~ S ~ - ~ W ~jP 1~ ~~t fi ~9~a1!'° ••g cQ SEE °Q i Q ~ Z ~ i"+ ~~i~;°: aie9t~ d16E11~r :1,973 1 :: 39i y~~f ~i~ Z O ~ V J a~W< _~ V~Qm~Z Q Z ~ V ~ IEQ E ~°_ EQ 1 - _ !p dh f -Q ~ Ilj a y ~ ~:$ ~ ~%e ~ x:60. a. e- ~ ~~- E~ u; a ' N G ~ ,Q i ~ _ ~Q i H a ~ - - - a °C ~~~ BI ~ ~ W ! ` ~~~~~ F` e a _ ~ ~ - d ~J , ,: ~ :; ,. c ' Ef Q a: a~E ~ j ~° . x !5 ~ ~ ! a' S - a ~ ~ ~~ o o Q g ,~ e E 1 ~~ / v~ f / at¢~ wn mzc® wn ~ ~ .3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ • • .~~ SI- ! 7N~33L'j 31V15Li3JJJl s ~ • ~ ., __ r. ~i ~ i - --- --I (___ ~- ~- ~ ~ ~ ' .~ '~- ... ~ ~b ~ ... -- ~ ::: ~ ::~:. ~ . . ~.,t.. .. r-r s s e ~~0 •~ . ~~Il.. - SITE P L A N L. ~= • . iM w RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SANTA ANITA INDUSTRIAL FACILITY ,,,,.,, w m~ PARAGON DEVELOPMENT °""" H P ~ .u. •no r.un un• . •urur n.r• uumn. wu nrvu•-...• __ -- ATI VM ,. F-__._....~ ,.. -s~,,,w . _ ~__ - ~=~~ w ~ ___~ "~4 . CIRCULATION PLAN ~' ~ ~ - ~"~ ~ ~ TENTATIVE FPARCEL MAP ' GENERAL tlJDUSTRULL. ~,~.,~, I ~_ ~ ~ i ~ NO. 15665 GEr~+AL nousTRwL ~' ~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORMA I GEfSRAL 1 .~~~,~- I ~~ GENERAL ~ ~II woUSTRw. ~'a - - 1 BY OIIEI6 11 ®'"~ I 1 1 SCE TIiANSMSION j 1 ' CGRRbOR 2 ~ ~°~'~ I'~ -N- LEGEND I GFJJ~AL 1 < H PROPOSED TRAFFIC CIROUTATION 0 r § awmu RbI1GTRUL MLVSTRIAL ~ I SQp I >' 1 .RI.~T I ux msao® PARm CI I PROPOSED STREETS IMPROVEMENTS 4 - E i SCE I - I '=` TRANSMSION lq CDRRIDOR FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS LS ~ ~ I I ~\ lANO USE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL t` wn ®m~a A®M Q ~ I ~,. P~Im I SUB-AREA I{ U) { \ ~ I I J ~ ~ ., . wusTRwL I I 1 R I 1 ~ I GEIiFlAL 1 NmUSTRIAL .ARD9 E { Y I __ I I, ~I ~~ 1~ {l ~ , { ~~ I t a'r G{ r ~; ~ -i i 1 - ~ J ~,~> CJ~ ~ r ..Rm. VQD/ITY NIP = :.IIA00. C.ylO.01, fAAJ iJ__e Qf.,.A,MIN .L.11 J I j ~ ° WEBB saasz TdfATwRl .Awes wAP • RESOLUTION NO 02-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15665, A SUBDIVISION CREATING 4 PARCELS ON 33.77 ACRES, LOCATED NORTH OF THE TERMINUS OF SANTA ANNTA AVENUE, EAST OF DAY CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 229-283-48 A Rentals 1. Paragon development filed an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15665, as described m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is refen•ed to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of February 2002, the Plamm~g Commission held a duly advertised public heanngforthe above-described map All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenn:d meeting on February 27, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds and concludes as follows a The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the obtecUves ofthe General Plan and Development Code, and b. The site is physically swtable for the future industrial development, and c The proposed subdivision well not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting properties, 3 Based upon the facts and information contained m the staff report of February 27, 2002, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental reviewforthe application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that this project is categorically exempt per Class 15, Minor Land Divisions, as defined in Section 15315 of the California Environmental Quality Act Gwdelmes 4 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference • ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-32 SUBTPM15665 -PARAGON DEVELOPMENT CORP February 27, 2002 Page 2 • Enameenna Division 1) Santa Anita Avenue shall be improved full width m accordancewRh City "Industnal Local" standards mGuding a c pavement, curbs, gutters, 9500 lumens HPSV street lights, traffic signs, and stnpmg as follows a) The developer shall acquve off-site nghts-of-way for Santa Anita Avenue, north of 6th Street, across the SCE and MWD corridors, pnor to final map approval If the developer is unable to obtain the nghts-of-way, the developer may request the City to assist the developer Huth the acgwsition of off-site property interests, m contunction ninth the standard condition regarding condemnation In the event the developer or the City is not able to acgwre the necessary off-site nghts-of-way, the final map shall be disapproved per Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 66473 of the Subdivision Map Act b) The proposed Santa Anita Avenue, north of 6th Street, shall be constructed full vndth to the northerly property line of Parcel 2 Since that exceeds 600 feet in length, the developer Hell need to prowde an emergency access easement from Parcel 1 to Parcel 2, to the satisfaction of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct and . the City Engineer c) Street trees, property line, adjacent sidewalk, and drive approaches shall be installed upon development 2) Improve 6th Street in accordance Huth City "Secondary Artenal" standards including a c pavement, curbs, gutters, 95001umens HPSV street lights, traffic signs, and stnpmg as follows a) Provde "side by side" left-tum lanes between the two Santa Aniila Avenue intersections (100.foot nght-of-way 14foot eastbound through, 12-foot eastbound through, 12-foot eastbound left-tum, 12-foot westbound left-tum, 12-foot westbound through, 14foot westbound through curb-to-curb, and 12-foot parkways) b) Complete 6th Street to full width from the existing Day Creek Channel budge, east of Hyssop Dnve to AT&SF railroad spur Ime Provide a bamcade at the railroad tracks The developer will receive Transportation Development Fee credit for the middle 38 feet of pavement and required traffic signals c) Street trees, property Ime, adtacent sidewalk, and dnve approaches shall be installed upon development 3) Provide a public storm dram extending from the ewstmg 78-inch RCP . Day Creek Channel connection at the southwest comer of this site to Santa Anita Avenue, then north to 6th Street, and east to include the Santa Anita offset on the north side Intersections vathin 6th Street .~ 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-32 SUBTPM15665 -PARAGON DEVELOPMENT CORP. February 27, 2002 Page 3 shall be designed without cross gutters Final drainage study shall determine whether additional local storm drams are needed 4) Provide a 25-foot public storm dram easement on Parcel 3 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal, except from the 66 KV electncal) along the proposed extension of Santa Anita Avenue, north of 6th Street, shall be undergrounded from the poles fronting Parcel 2 to the first pole east of the proposed Santa Anita Avenue (on SCE property) and from the poles at the northerly boundary of Parcel 2 and the first pole off-site east of the easterly nght- of-way of the proposed Santa Anita Avenue Also, the existing overhead utilities on 6th Street, east of the proposed Santa Anita Avenue, shall be undergrounded from the first poles south and north of 6th Street All undergroundings shall be done pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recoverone-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development as rt occurs on the opposite side of the street If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within sa months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate 5 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Larry T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of February 2002, by the folloHnng vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENI~ STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (SUBTT15665) SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 33.77 ACRES INTO 4 PARCELS APPLICANT: PARAGON DEVELOPMENT CORP. LOCATION: 6TH STREET AND SANTA ANITA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its ___/_/ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Cdy may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at ds own expense in the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard ~~_ Conditions, shall be included m legible form on the grading plans, bwldmg and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1 This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning ~~_ Commission, unless a complete final map is ftled with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ~~- site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code . regulations SC-01-02 1~ Protect No SUBTPMi5665 • 2 Revised sde plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwlding pennds 3 All site, grading, landscape, vrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc.) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable Ctty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specrfic Plans in effect at the time of bwlding permit issuance 5. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: D. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all intenor public streets, commundy trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentatve map Pnvate easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2 Dedication shall be made of the following nghts-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline)• 44 total feet on 6th Street 33 total feet on Santa Anita Avenue 3 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future nghts-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along nght turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs If curb adfacent sidewalk is used along the nght tum lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 6 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acgwre the required off-sde property interests necessary to construct the requred public improvements, and tf he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City deades to acgwre the property interests regwred for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the Cdy rf the City deades to acquire the off-site property interests regwred in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the Ctty prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to Santa Anita Avenue, north of 6th Street. Comolet~on Date ~~_ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~_ ~-/_ ~~- ~~_ ~~- ~.~ SC-01-02 2 1-ll Protect No SUBTPM15665 E. Street Improvements 1 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & AC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trell 6th Street X X X X X X Santa Anita Avenue X X X X X X Notes. (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays well be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 2 Improvement Plans and Construction a. Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mafor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes (1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specfied by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Comolehon Date • .~~_ ~~- ~~- _,~ i ~~_ ~~- ~~- J-~_ ---~~-s SC-01-02 3 ~ I~ Protect No SUBTPM15665 • 3 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Cary Standards in accordance with the Cdys street tree program 4. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance wdh adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as regwred F. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permts whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautdication Master Plan 6th Street G. Drainage and Flood Control 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the Crty Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwlding permts, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Crty Engineer A pernd from the San Bemardino County Flood Control District is required for work wdhin ds right-of-way 3 Trees are prohibited wdhin 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk H. Improvement Completion 1 If the regwred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for• Full width street improvements and street lights. I. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utildy Standards Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requrements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permts, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdroision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them sc-ol-oz a ~ 13 Comolehon Date ~~- ~~- -/___/. ___/~- ~~- ~~. ~~. ~~_ ~~. ~~- _/___/_ -/~. Project No SUBTPM75665 Completion Date J. General Requirements and Approvals . 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all .~~_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: See attached • bl~ sc-oi-o2 . '_~W~ • FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~ "~~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0387 PROJECT #: SUBTPM15665 PROJECT NAME: Santa Ana Distribution Center DATE: January 15, 2002 PLAN TYPE: Tentative Parcel Map APPLICANT NAME: Paragon Development Corp LOCATION: 6'" Street and Santa Ana FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locati, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Douglas Fenn . ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The Technical Review is normally the second stage in the Development Review process involving Fire Distract review The following conditions of approval were identified in the initial protect review and have not been addressed by the applicant Although we have teed, not all Fire District requvements for the proposed protect may be included Additions to or changes in the prolect may result in additional or changed Fire District requirements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review "Bold" items identified below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Planning Division to obtain Fire Distract approval If your prolect is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fire Distract conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Outstanding Fire Distract Issues Required Note This prolect has outstanding unpaid service fees in the amount of $132 that are due and payable at this time. Please remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire District B. Community Faahhes Distracts Required Note: The prolect is located within a "Mello-Roos" Community Facilities Distract for fire protection services . C. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the requved fire fiow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on access roadways, not line of sight i~i6' Required Note: The regwred fire flow for this protect shall be 41000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended For planning purposes one fire hydrant is regwred per 1000 gallons of regwred fire flow NOTE If re cared fire flow cannot be rovided for the roect all structures Fire District aooroved mitigation is required 3. Required Note: The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located m accordance witR Fire Code Appendix III-B, as amended Public fire hydrants located with a 500-foot radws of the proposed may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to prowde regwred fire flow D. Water Availability Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall prowde evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract Water Avadabilrtv for Fire Protection Form shall be signed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract If sufficient water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extmgwshing system may be regwred m each structure affected by the insufficient flow. E. Fire District Service Fees' The following fees may be applicable to this project and are being identified at this time to assist the applicant in planning for future costs. Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required installations subject to approval by the Fire District The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted. When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division " a $82 Start-up Fee for commercial, industrial ormulti-family dwelimg unds (Paid prior to TRC) b $132 Fire Distract Review of Tractor Parcel Maps other than Single-family Residential Tract c $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fue Protection d $132 for Private Fue Mains or Fue Sprinkler Underground Water Supply e. $677 (per new bwldmg) for New Commercial and Industrial Development Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fue Safety Dmsion ` Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Servces unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans The following service fees are due to the Fire District and payable at this time: a $132 Fire Distract Review of Tract or Parcel Maps other than Srngle-family Residential Tract b $ 132 -Total due at this time Remd payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire District " Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fue Safety Droision ' Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fue Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alann systems, fire extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans F. Other Fue District Requirements or Comments NOTE Water supply should be evaluated to determine if required fire flow is available Fue Distract Conditions of Approval- Template SL 11/20/O1Rewsron ,p~ >• T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE: February 27, 2002 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, City Planner BY. Donald Granger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00545 - ARNE ERIKSON - A request to construct a 3,487 square foot single-family home on 2.74 acres of land in the Hillside Residential Distnct, on Skyline Road, north of Almond Street - APN: 200-441-68. ANALYSIS. A Applicable Regulations. The Development Code requires Planning Commission Review when one or more of the following activities are proposed: natural slopes equal to or greater than 15 percent on all or part of the subject site; for fills or excavations exceeding 5 feet in vertical depth; and for fills or excavations that result in earthwork quantities of 1,500 cubic yards or more The subject property has natural slopes that range from 10 to 50 percent, proposes 8 feet of excavation, and earthwork quantities totaling 2,500 cubic yards. B Background: The site is within Tract 10210, a 33-lot subdivision that was recorded in 1986. To date, there are approximately 9 vacant lots left within the subdivision. The lot is located on the north side of Skyline Dnve, along the north boundary of the subdivision, and slopes steeply from north to south (front line to rear lot line) Existing homes within the subdivision are single and two-story, with architectural styles and features similar to that proposed The existing homes utilized contour grading, stepped pads and slope plantings to meet the requirements of the Hillside Ordinance C. Proposed Project The applicant is proposing to build asingle-story, single-family home . The lot is generally rectangular in shape and shares access with the adjacent lot to the west from one dnveway off Skyline Road The proposed house meets the requirements for allowable building envelope, setbacks, and lot coverage Slopes are variable, ranging from 10 percent to over 50 percent An improved Community Trail exists in the parkway along the Skyline Road. The proposed house is designed with a stepped pad that has a grade change of 4 feet Two side entry detached garages are located downslope from the house. Both garages have floor elevations that are 11 feet lower than the living area of the house and have utilized the grade difference by incorporating rooftop decks that are accessible from the house by walkways. Architecturally, the house is compatible with the surrounding area ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRDRC2001-00545-ARNE ERIKSEN February 27, 2002 Page 2 D. Gradma Committee: On January 15, 2002, the Grading Committee reviewed the prolect and recommended approval Although the prolect exceeds 5 vertical feet of cut in certain areas, staff believes the proposed design is consistent with the existing homes within the subdivision and meets the gwdelrnes of the Hillside Development Regulations by reducing the amount of necessary grading through the use of a split pad design that has a grade difference of 4 feet. Additionally, the proposed grading has been mitigated through the use of mature landscaping and contour grading The landscape and precise grading plan, including slope design and plant palette selection, will be reviewed by the City Planner poor to building permit issuance. E. Desion Review Committee: On January 15, 2002, the Committee (McNiel, Stewart, and Fong) reviewed the prolect and recommended approval, subject to staff's recommendation that graded slopes be rounded off and contoured to blend with the land F. Technical Review Commttee• On January 16, 2002, the Committee reviewed the prolect and deterrmned that review by the Planning Commission would be required because the prolect naturally slopes equal to or greater than 15 percent, has excavations greater than 5 vertical feet, and has earthwork quantities greater than 1,500 cubic yams. The prolect is consistent with all other applicable Hillside Regulations and Development Code regwrements. G. Environmental Assessment• The prolect is categoncally exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Gwdelines. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the prolect site. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2001-00545 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB.DG\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A° -Site Plan Exhibit "B" -Grading Plan Exhibit °C" -Elevations Exhibit °D" -Floor Plan Exhibit "E" Roof Plan Exhibit "F" -Information Sheet Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2001-00545 L II/17777 _ i ~~~ I I ~ I ' i I f _ ~ ( - / I i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ /, I ~ i \ is I~ ~ z~ ,a ~ l a N i ~D °~ =y ~~~~~ ~~ m ~i ,' aoO j m£ I 8 ~~~ w- m~ c4 0 .~~ A ~~ } Eck\~'~I ~ ~c~,.t\, ~AL ~// \ \ _` 11 ~'. r T ~+a '_~~ ,_~ T1000' _2=0E OF SLOPE-^ ! o - -_.. TIDE OF SLOrE - ~' ~ ' I m }''~~~~ m ~~, __ ~~J ' ~~ --4 ~ `(arol I 1 ~ .i ' .1'I" __ _ _ ~ I~b l ~ ~ : u .~'~~ ~~I~~I (aa~i _ _ _ ~ I S . -1;. .:wy. r - ... - ~ .Qr T - ry~t ~ ~- r ~ ~~ ~ _ _ ta9o) I I I ' \ ~ - _ _ _ FAULT LINE SE7gq~ I I `\\ \ - - I ~ ~,\~~~ - ; ~_- -_-(von ~ I zl ~ ~ .' ___ -._ -_ vl I T F \ \ ~ _ __ S m m ~~ , ~ ~ , - I w ,~ ~ I -) ~', n / - ~, i ~ ~ ..~ - I~r=~ ~ ~~ ~ \ _ I _p+ ~` ~Oqv t '~ r =AULT=iN=5ETB4IX I I !~ z ° ~ ~ t ~ \ r . ~` - >g ~ \ ~~ y ~n ~ _ / j A \ ~`~ `~ , I I I u ~ ~ I ; ~ \ ,~£ ~ ~ "\ ~ ~ t w ~ D I I \ •b~l }I i \ \ ~I I,?4td~jQa aa~I PIII~ ~ _ ii °" t„ r+ a _~ ~+~ I~ D'~~1~1Q7~~ Custom Residence for the Eriksen's Lof 33 Trott 10210 Rancho Cucamonga r..L iL 7L tt A H n ,.. ,.. •.-- C„L-..~ rono~ non nn .n noon.,.. ....~ - F \~ fa°lyp ae~q B~I 11 P OI I! I I ~I ~ : ~ ~\ '>~ ~~~~~a~a~~~~Rl~~~~ ~~~ i~~ba ~ $~~i~ ~~ ` ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~! ~ ~ Liv ~ "4 ~ $ a ~~ ~ .. I •• ~ a~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ e~3 ~~ ai .1 i '~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~I~ I~~ i~~1 ~~V^~ ~~n~~ ~: ~. ~\1 ~` ~~~;~~ °--- `` 1 i 1A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --~_ ~ ~ ~1~~1\~~ ~ `\`\ ~_ '~-~._ -_ (tom) -~ --.~__1yy~_ 11 \ J~ ~ Imo' =~_~.~ __ _~P ,-- -~ ._ ~ _ ~ I ~ ~ 0000 ~F% ~ a ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~`[~~~ J ---~ i ,`, - ~~:~1~ Kati--- ~'' ~ j_r~ _ ,-- ,~ ~ ~i,L~ ~`- i p"6 ~i~€~~ a~~~~E~ i~~s ~~~i~~i ~g°a epa ~~~ ~~~° ~ ~ ~' ~! ~~,~` i°~~~'~ ~'!~ ~li~g~e ed9~ It~ ~' is°3 4~ i~ ~;'~~ ~~~I~;a ~~~~ 1 ~io~s ~paa f~ =sii I~i~ ~i ~ ~ i °~,~ ~ea~ ~i~~i a ~i ~' ~a~° i~~t °iaaaaa~,~ °ii°e ° .._ ~`\ i ~ ~~o ~~~ ~ , ~. ,~ ~ , g. ~ ~°`~ °'~ BB,~ ~~~ I ~ ii ~~~~ ~o ~E a"r~F ~~e g~6 ~~ai i~~ ~~~~ a~i~ ~~ ~° ~ia~ ~~ ail ~~'i ~~I ~ aei a~x~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ i~ ~~: i.~ ~,' 'p~, $ a ?i18 ,a ~°" °~ ~ ~~ j i ~Ti a~ i~ g~~ ~ a. a a~~ °~I ~ eel i~ ~ ~°6 I' ~~ '~~ ° 6 ° ~ • 3A~~~ \ ~Y°"mob i~~~ 'C tlC( f! ~ '13~3~ a~ ~ ~ a °t~~ ~ R~°~ Y' g ~ e ' i 833 ~~~~ ~ ~ • ~~ ~ ~' ~~~~ a = ~~~ ~H~Nda ~0 ~ "~ d r1 U ~ ~ ~ s a OF RANCHO CUCA ~ U MONGA o °~ a a e ~~ N~ X11 ~I 2~PI I I I I ~ ~ ~~ ~Ifl~l ~~~~~~~ y~ L ~~i~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ . 0000 4 ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~; ~r?a ~ ~ ~ ~~q~~~~~ 4 ~~~~g~~~9~~ jg~~~ ~~~~~~~$~~e4~~~~@@ .. I ~ll~~• 11Y[NSt YPj ~ ~ 8 R ~~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~ I, e ~, I ~ ~ I ~ i ,4 ~ ~ , ~ r n = o s ~~ ~$ I i ~ ~ I ~ 9 ~ ~ 11 i~ ~ ' ~ e ' I ~ I ' 1 I I i I ( i 1~ ~ II~ ~~~~II~~III~ ~ I~ iI V III i ,~ ~ ~ ~ a e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e a a d d d d d d d d d d d d d d 1 d c.. L.: 4.:a uG Ass I i I I I I ~ o e o ~ I u ~~ ~ I i I , I I~ i ~ 1 I I1~ ~1 I ~ "I i I R ~ ~~ ~B ~ I ~i ~ I q~n d =vhihi4 ~~R _7f~ ~ a e ~ ~ ~ R d d d d a a ~ d d d d d s d ~~ f ~~~~ ~~~~ 0000 ~ ~; ~ ~~~~~~~E <«.~II i ~ a~~ ~ ~~~ ~ i E ~`Di~ ~~ yo~~ .. p.,S .pi S ~~~ ~ ~~ A R d d g ~ a x ~ s ~ ~ d d d d d d d d a ~' A ~_ m i ~ •m ~r -m o G ' D O -- § _ - n a F ~~ e-o' , ~1 YA ,_t _-o ~ U ~ ~ a 1 1 - ~ o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 ( & I ! I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I • I I I " I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 i_-o i E d 8 ~ i i I I Imo- I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I g ~: I I ' e ` Custom Residence for the Ertksen's F12CpFJIROEDER e W ~ n ~ ~ 9 ~~F I~C,/1 ~ ~ - Lof 33, Trac110210 Rancho Cucamon Q ARC HIiEC 7U RE d Ame Enksen (909) 982-9940 ,,,,„u,~,~ uvw .-~. -rv i ~ i• aani ~aiie ~av o6uowoanJ oyouob OlZOl Joo lE Elo1 § a ~0 ~~~ s,uas~~3 aye ~o~ a~uap~saa wo~sn~ ~ ` ~,~,Q ; C vhi hl J J J J. J J J y I I J u <<r_~ ~~ bi ~~ :I :I 1 Y `. Y f y~ 9 I' i ~i I IIII WWW~IIII I a r B ' J ~/ ~~I u Z Q ~ F o I I `J W _~ I o e ~ w I .0-P u~ O-Y S~ .0-~ o ~ ~ w J X Q CC..JJ ;I ~ f J S{ .O- OS i V ~U u~ uY z~ _~ Q O W J ~ W ~ W 4 D! ~S i• .u.. wo..~ sw.m...~ni """'°""""""'"'""" "°' Ob66-Z86 (6061 uas~u3 awy a a n i ~ a~nn.. o6uowo~n) oy~uoy OIZOI J~~~l'C£ lol ~ i p Q aawonuaa~aa'~1 s,uas~~3 ay; ~o~ a~uaplsaa wo~sn~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ i , f ;• CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w FEB 12 2002 ~ ~ Z o LL r _o Q Y = J RECEIVED -PLANNING w w a ~ m Q N Q ~~ 8~ _~ y ~W ~° ~- 4 CC ~ _ ~ ~ ~~ :' ~~ 5~ Y~' I. oo ~ e u u -- `-~ ~~ ,~' + `- 1 ) ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 - ~ rs "~ ~ '~V-1 _ i 7 ~, ~ •~ -,, o. '~~'. - ¢~ ~ ~ J "} ~ ~ - o Y ~~~ - ~ t u s ~ - %_ t i Gvhihl+ ttn11 ,(~,j" ,~...~.., .~.m..~ a a n t J 31 i 11 J a v~ OV 66-186 (606( uas~u3 awy DBUOU1D~f1J 04JUDjJ OIlOI JJDJj'~ JOB ~ § z !'7 i ~~~~a n~ ~ s,uas~~3 ay;~o; a~uaplsab wo;sn~ ~J~ W~~Ja; .. I .E- ,~ J ~ - -- _ _ ~ - --~. ~ ~, >- -~; J F, - _ ~ .~ __ i --- __ ~ u , ~ ,u ` ~_ - _ irk.. \F ~ - ~ -- ~~ - ~i ~ t t~ _ ~~~~~ ~_ . _ _ i w _' I r ~,`~ _ '1 , I`F ~~ ~ ~ c~ -~° I _ G ~ ~ ~ kr A-~ '-5 n-A' F ___ r ~ ~~ A~ __ _. ova * ~ . , ~~ I ,-•- --~ V~ Exhihit "F" ~~i~f~_ -~ ~' ~ ~~ 1 ~ -- a z= a. ~. ~~~ ~_ 8~ _.~. 0 ~, .~~> _ ~~~ k Y I I b .: • INFORMATION SHEET , DRC2001-00545 FILE NO: DRC2001-00545 PROJECT NAME: SINGLE-FAMILY HILLSIDE REVIEW APPLICANT: MR. ARNE ERIKSON LOCATION• LOT 33 OF TRACT 10210 FLOOR AREA• 3,487 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: RESIDENTIAL EXISTING ZONING: HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL EXISTING LAND USE VACANT GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USE: . ZONING LAND USE North: SAN BERNARDINO NATIONAL FOREST FOREST South: HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT VACANT East: VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL VACANT West: HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT VACANT SITE DESCRIPTION. The lot is generally rectangular in shape, and shares access with the adjacent lotto the west from one dnveway off Skyline Road. The lot is located on the north side of Skyline dnve, near the north boundary of the subdivision, and slopes northerly (front Ime to rear lot Ime). Slopes are vanable, ranging from 10 percent to over 50 percent. SITE SIZE' 2.74 Acres PARKING CALCULATIONS Number of Number of Type Square Spaces Spaces of use Footage Required Provides Single-family residence 3,487 2-car garage 4-car garage ~xyieir 'F " r RESOLUTION NO. 02-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00545, A REQUESTTOCONSTRUCTA3,467 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME ON 2 74 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON SKYLINE ROAD, NORTH OF ALMOND STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 200-441-68. A Rentals. 1 Mr Ame Enkson filed an application for the approval of Development Rewew DRC2001-00545, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 27th day of February 2002, the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meetmg on that date 3 All legal prerequisites poor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby spenfically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and con-ect 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on February 27, 2002, mGudmg wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows a The application applies to real property located on Skyline Road, Lot 33 of recorded Tract 10210, moth an approximate street frontage of 366 feet and lot depth of approximately 300 feet The property has extstmg slopes that range from 10 to 50 percent, and b The property to the north is vacant and is located mnthm the San Bemardmo National Forest, the property to the east is vacant and is located within the Very Low Residential Distnct, the properties to the south and west are vacant and are located within the Hillside Residential Distnct, and c The application proposes the construction of a 3,467 square foot single-family home, a permitted use mnthm the Hillside Residential Distnct The conn:ptual grading plan proposes 8 feet of excavation, and earthwork quantities totaling 2,500 cubic yards, and d The application proposes asingle-family home that is designed ninth asplit-pad design that mGudes a grade change of four feet and detached garages located downslope from the house that function as rooftop decks, thereby meetmg the goals and obtectives of the Hillside • Ordmann: by utilizing design techrnques that redun: grading and allow the structure to conform to the natural landfortn, and I~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-33 DRC2001-00545 - ARNE ERIKSON February 27, 2002 Page 2 e The proposed architectural style of the single-family home, wrath quoins, stucco matenal and strong vanation m the roof plane, is compatible wrath the surrounding development; and f The proposed application includes contour grading and slope plantings consisting of clusters of trees and shrubs, thereby meeting the goals and objectives of the Hdlsrde Ordinance by reduang the impacts of gradrng and soffenrng the appearance of manufactured slopes 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commissron during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commrssron hereby finds and concludes as follows• a The proposed project rs consistent ninth the objectives of the General Plan, and b The proposed use is m accord wrath the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the drstnct m which the site is located, and c The proposed use is m compliance wrath each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together wrath the conditions applicable thereto, wall not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally m~unous to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4 The Commission hereby finds and detertmnes that the project identified rn this Resolution is categoncafly exempt from the regwrements of the Califomra Environmental l2ualrty Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEOA Gwdelmes 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion setforth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planrnnsr Dwision• 1) Approval is fora 3,487 square foot home on Lot 33 of Tract 10210 2) Front yard landscaping shall be installed In addition to the vegetation required by the Hillside Ordinance, mature landscaping well be required to be planted on the site to soften the appearance of the project, to the satisfaction of the City Planner Pnor to building permit issuance, a detailed landscape and imgation plan shall be submitted to the Crty Planner for review and approval 3) A minimum of 30 percent of the plant matenals shall be large size of 24-inch box trees or 10-gallon size shrubs 4) Graded slopes shall be rounded-off and contoured to blend with the . land, avoiding straight, uniform slopes, to the satisfaction of the City Planner Pnor to budding permit issuance, a precise grading plan shall be submitted for review and approval {3 ~.J u PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-33 DRC2001-00545 - ARNE ERIKSON February 27, 2002 Page 3 5) All walls exposed to public view, including retaining walls, shall be decorative masonry Decorative shall mean stucco finish, split face block, or slumpstone 6) Retaining wall height shall not exceed 4 feet upslope from the sWdure, and 3%z feet downslope from the structure and adjacent to driveways Enameenna Division 1) The security of the City drainage facility shall not be compromised. Provide additional security fencing around the City drainage area and/or a gated entrance that can be used by all, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 2) Revise existing Public Improvement Drawing No 796 to reflect improvements in the parkway, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Show required street trees, drive approach entrance gate, and/or security fencing where applicable 3) On the grading plan, provide for a mawmum allowable slope of 20 peroent around the entire structure, within 5 feet of all building lines, and then loin the 2 1 slope away from the building 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Lang T McNiel, Chairman Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of February day of September 2002, by the following vote-to-vnt AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2001-00545 SUBJECT: SINGLE-FAMILY HILLSIDE RESIDENCE APPLICANT: ARNE ERIKSEN LOCATION: LOT 33 OF TRACT 10210 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements m I~~on o 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Crty, ds ~ _J~_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aftematrve, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, ds agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at ds sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this conddion. 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard ~~_ Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and imgation plans submmed for plan check B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permd, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expve rf _(_J_ budding permds are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1. The sde shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ~~- sde plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2. Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~~- of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. ~ is SG01-02 Protect No DRC2001.00545 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submttted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Bwldmg and Safety Division to show compltance. The buildings shall be inspected for compltance prior to occupancy. 4 Revised sde plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submttted for Cdy Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits 5 All sde, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to tssuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compltance wdh all sections of the Development Code, all other appltcable Ctty Ordinances, and appltcable Community or Specrfic Plans in effect at the time of butldtng penntt tssuance. 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units wdh all receptacles shielded from public view. 8 All ground-mounted uttldy appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Cdy Planner For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual unds shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 10. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conddions, fenctng, and weed control, in accordance wdh City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Ctty Planner rewew and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fenctng and drainage devices, in confunction with street improvements. a Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5.1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 11. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two ~-inch lag bolts, to wdhstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed to an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 12 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant 13. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 14 For restdenttal development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 15 Where rock cobble is used, tt shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of restdenttal development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 6cisting trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected wdh a construction bamer in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The SC-01-02 2 ~ I ~ Completion Date -/~- ~~- ~~_ ~~_ ~~- ~~- ~~_ ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~- ~~_ -1__J_ ~~_ ~~_ Protect No DRC2001-00545 Completion Dete location of those trees to be preserved to place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arbonst's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. ' • 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 ~~_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropnate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than B feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater ~~- slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows. one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft of slope area, and appropnate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 5. Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irigation shall be requred per the Development -J_J_ Code. E. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~_/ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner rewew and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following• ~~_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g. Planning Division Project Number (i e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identrfied on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report. ~~ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and °wet° signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~~- 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to ~~-* the City pnor to permit issuance I / SG01-02 Protect No DRC2001-00545 Comolehon Date G. Site Development ~ 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be ~~- marked with the protect file number (t.e., CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Unform Budding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accesstbdtty requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations m effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Budding and Safety Dtvision for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of budding permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or mator addition to ~~_ existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division pnor to perinit issuance. 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwldmg Official, after tracUpamel map recordation and ~~ pnor to issuance of budding permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p m. and 6.30 a.m. Monday ~~_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. H. New Structures 1. Provide compliance wdh the Unrform Bwldmg Code for the property line clearances considering ~~_ use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2. Provide compliance with the Unrfonn Bwldmg Code for required occupancy separation(s). ~~ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's 'high wind° instructions. ~~_ I. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be m accordance with the Uniform Bwldmg Code, City ~~_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Caltfomta to ~~_ pertorm such work. 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualfied engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved pnor to issuance of bwlding permits. ~~_ 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for ~~_ existing bwidtngs where improvements being proposed wdl generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fdl The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Crvd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Street Improvements 1 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in ~~_ accordance with the City's street tree program ~$ SC-01-02 4 Project No DRC2001-00545 Completion Date K. Drainage and Flood Control 1. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surtace drainage entenng the ~~ property from adjacent areas L. Utilities 1. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved ~~- Approval of the final parcel map will be subfect to any regwrements that may be received from them. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. -J.-/ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are wdhin ~~_ 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead boR shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. ~~- N. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be Irfted ~~- from frame or track in any manner APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: See attached comments. ~~ SC-01-02 `r Y-. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~ ~-.4, ~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0525 PROJECT #: DRC2001-00545 PROJECT NAME: Eriksen Residence DATE: December 6, 2001 PLAN TYPE: SFR in Hazardous Fire Area APPLICANT NAME: Ame Eriksen OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group R, Division 3 and U FLOOR AREA (S): 3597 s f TYPE CONSTRUCTION: _Type V N aS ShOWn LOCATION: N/E side of Skyline Tract 10210, Lot 33 FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locati, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Donald Granger ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following comments and conditions represent the minimum standard for Fire District approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based upon review of the plans submitted Although we have tried, not all Fire District requirements for the proposed protect may be included Additions to or changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire District requirements Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review "Bold" items ident~ed below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Planning Division to obtain Fire District approval If your protect is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval Include main size 2 Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval B. WaterAvailabddy 1 Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of ~D adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avarlabrlrtv for Fire Protection Form shall be completed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If sufficient water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be regwred in each structure affected by the insufficient flow C. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems ~ 1 Required Note All commeraal or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, multi-family residential structures, and all structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (See Fire Access below), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 2 Required Note Any structure or budding that does not meet minimum Fire District access requirements shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system Dead-end cul-de-sacs in excess of 600- feet, failure to provide regwred access to all portions of exterior, substandard cul-de-sac radu, i e , necessitate mitigation by a complete automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout the affected building(s) See Fire Access below for deficiency requinng mitigation 3 Plans for the requued automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a Fve Construction Services permit 4 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services D. Fire Access 1 Required Note. Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every faality, bwldmg, or portion of a budding constructed when any portion of the faality or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150-feet from an approved fire distract vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or budding 2 Required Note All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be locat within 150 feet of Fire District vehice access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around exterior of the bwldmg ~andsceped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are an obstruction 3 Required Note Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in ~nndth and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and Gear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance wdh Fire District Standards 4 Required Note- Single-family Residential Dead-end roadways shall not exceed 600 feet in length measured from the vertical plane of the curb on the cross street to the curb line at the top of the cul-de-sac 5 Requred Note- Mulb-family Residential Dead~nd roadways shall not exceed 300 feet in length measured from the vertical plane of the curb on the cross street to the curb line at the top of the cul-de-sac 6 Required Note Amend proposed site access to accommodate Fire District emergency vehice access 7 New single-family dwellings shall post the address vnth minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When bwldmg setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry E. Hazardous Fire Area 1 Required Note Hazardous Fire Area Development- Prior to the issuance of a budding permd, the applicant shall meet all regwrements for development and construction within the Hillside District, the Very High Fire Hazard Seventy Zone (VHFHSZ), and the State Responsibility Area (SRA) This may include increased stre~ v~ndths, on-site water supplies, fire-resistive construction, Class A roof assemblies, fire sprinklers, et contained in the Fire Safety Overlay Distract Standards °rl F. Fuel ModificatioNHazard Reduction Plan (Required Note for All Maps and Plans) 1 This prolect is located in the "Hazardous Fire Area" based on proximity to or exposure urban -vnldland interface Mitigation measures are required The bwlding(s) shall be constructed in accordance with the standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay District- Area FR-1 or Area FR-2 2 Landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Fire Safety Division for review of proposed vegetation All groundcover, shrubs, plants, and trees are regwred to be fire-resistive in accordance with published references The plant palette shall include the common name for all vegetation The landscaping plan shall identify all native species proposed for retention 3 Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain the Fire District approval of a preliminary fuel modfiication/hazard reduction plan and program The plan(s) shall be prepared by an individual or firm qualfied and expenenced in wildfire hazard mitigation planning 4 Prior to the issuance of any precise grading or budding permit, the applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel mod~cation/hazard reduction plan and program The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of nsk to the sWctures by vegetation 5 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit the developer shall have completed, in cooperation with the Fire District, that portion of the approved fuel modficetion/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible matenals into the protect area Approval is subject to final on-site inspection 6 Pnor to the issuance of any Certficete of Occupancy, the remainder of the fuel modficetion/hazard reduction plan shall be installed The Fin: District shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modficetion areas Further, the installed fuel modfiicetion plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fire District The CC&R's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modification zones, including the removal of all dead and dying vegetation subject to (annual) triennial inspections 7 Phased protects or temporary fuel mod~cetion plans must meet the requirements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire District G. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note• Pnor to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. H. Architectural Bwiding Plans 1 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Distnct Call the Fire ConsWction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for any regwred notes to be placed on the plans pnor to submittal I. Fire District Service Fees` 1 The following fees may be applicable to this project and are being identified at this time to assist the applicant in planning for future costs. Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required installations subtect to approval by the Fire District. The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted. When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division " $66 Preliminary Vegetation Management/Fuel Modfiication Plan (InGudes SFR In-fill lots) $132 Single-family Dwelling Review- Hazardous Fire Area $677 (per new bulding) for New Commercial and Industrial Development " Plus a microfiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division ~~ Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extngushng systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 2 The following service fees are due to the Fire District and payable at this time: $132 Single-family Dwelling Review- Hazardous Fire Area $732 -Total due at this time. Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire District" " Plus a microfiche/laser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet far all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division 'Note: Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans J. Plan Submittal Reqwred Notice 1 Plans shall be submRted and approved prior to construction in accordance v~nth 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE In addRion to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans K. Other Fire District Regwrements or Comments 1 NOTE Due to restrict access, topography, Gimatic conditions, and exposure to undisturbed native vegeta special mitigation measures are required for this proposed pro/ed This includes, but is not I~mded automatic fire sprinkler system, low flammability vegetation, masonry walls on interface property fines, 1 resistive construction on bwlding fronts faang intertace area, etc Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 10/24/01 Revision °c~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS HILLSIDE AND HAZARDOUS FIRE AREA DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPING REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Protect Type• Single-Family Dwelling or In-fill Lots Landscaping In Hazardous Flre Area Site Address: Plan Check Number: The following checked standard correction comments are applicable to this protect: ^ Proposed pro/ect is located within a designated hazardous fire area and is subject to special urban/wildland intertace hazard mitigation regwrements This includes compliance with construction standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety (FR) Overlay District regulations (Visit www co sari-bemardino ca us/IanduseserviceslDevCode/805-Overlav°/ 20Districts odf, for an Adobe copy The regulations are contained in Chapter 2) The following requirements shall be included as notes on the corrected plans under the tdle "Fuel ModificetwnNeaetatlon Management Plan Notes " ^ All native vegetation located within 30-feet of structure shall be removed and maintained as necessary. Exception Single specimens not more than 16-inches in height and 6-feet from structures, which are irrigated and maintained Soil erosion and sediment control measures shall be taken. ^ An irrigated zone shall be maintained around structures for a minimum of 30-feet All plants shall be fire- resistant and xeriscepe type Provide "cemmon" names on plant palette Maintain as necessary (Visit www ucfol ucoo edulveoetati htm for fire-resistant plant and defensible space landscaping information ) ^ Native grasses and weeds shall be removed or mowed/cut to a height of 4-inches and maintained as necessary Erosion and sediment control measures shall be taken ^ A minimum 6-toot tall nan-combustible masonry fence wdl be provided at property line to separate proposed protect from the adjacent property This is in lieu of fuel mod cation to adjacent property or when required distances cannot be provided ^ All tree limbs within 6-feet of the ground shall be pruned and disposed of properly All litter and leaves will be removed and disposed of propedy Maintain as necessary ^ This project requires a complete fuel modification/vegetation management plan Please contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Fire Safety Division at (909) 477-2770 for detailed regwrements. The following specific regwrements or conditions apply to this project Return this sheet with revised plans and ail previously submitted plans and specifications when corrections have ~en made thereon If you have questions please call (909) 477-2770, extension 3009. Check by: Steve Locati, Planning Specialist Date: Corrections Verified: 12/5/2001s1 hazfireareanottce