No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002/04/10 - Agenda Packet~J • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY APRIL 10, 2002 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Maaas _ Corn Mannenno _ Com. Stewart _ Com Tolstoy _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 27, 2002 Adloumed Meeting of March 27, 2002 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar dams are expected to be routine and non- controvers~al They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, d should be 2moved for d~scuss~on. A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00544 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION -The review of detailed site plans and budding elevations for 16 single family homes within approved Tentative Tract Map 16021 on 7 53 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located at the northwest comer of East Avenue and the Southern Paafic Railroad nght-of-way - APN• 227-121-30 and 43 Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16021 and Tree Removal Permit 99-23 c.~. ~~~ B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00588 - WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC -The review of detailed site plan and building elevations for 17 single family homes on 5 1 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwellings per acre), located at 8387 19th Street -APN• 202-021-37. Related file Tentatwe Tract Map SUBTT14162 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following dems are public heanngs m which concerned individuals may voce their opinion of the related protect Please wad to be recogn¢ed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limded to 5 minutes per individual for each protect. Please sign in after speaMng C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15783 - G&D CONSTRUCTION - A request for an extension of a previously approved residential subdivision of 27 single-family homes on 3.35 acres of land in the Medwm Residential Distnct (8-14 dwelling urnts per acre) located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vwero Street -APN: 207-022-54 and 64 Related File Vanance 96-02. Staff has prepared a determination that the protect is vnthm the scope of pnor environmental documents. VI. NEW BUSINESS D VIRGINIA DARE PARKING STUDY - A review of modifications to the shared parking concept and protected parking demand for the Virginia Dare Centre -APN: 107-766-101 through 105, 110, 114, and 116 through 118 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This ~s the time and place for the general public to address the comm~ss~on. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrehve Regulations that set an 11 00 p m ad/oumment time I/ dems go beyond that time, they shall be heard only wdh the consent of the (,OmmISSIOn 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning COmmISSIOn Secretary of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Apnl 4, 2002, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Gvic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga. n U • Page 2 Vicinity Map Planning Commission Ap ri 110, 2002 ;.. 1 ,- . - Sphere ~~ ~~ -: ~~~ ~:, ~~ Hillside 1 Wilson. 1 t. ' Banyan~~ ~+ U ~ ~~s4n "E - -~ ~ A B \ BaseNne J ~` C 1 1 Foothill 1 Arrow _1 'Q `~ fith ~ ,`~, w a~ ~ ~ 4th > v c y Y cry = ~ Q ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga * ~fTY HALL ~ • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report PATE April 10, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRONt Brad Buller, Clty Planner gy Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00544 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION - The review of detailed site plans and building elevations for 16 single-family homes within approved Tentative Tract 16021 on 7.53 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the northwest comer of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way - APN. 227-121-30 and 43 Related files: Tentative Tract SUBTT16021 and Tree Removal Permit 99-23 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density. The project site Is 2 8 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family and vacant land South - Southem Pacific Railroad nght-of-way, (tracks are not in service) East - Single-Family Residential yyest - Single-Family Residential and Historical Hibbard Ranch C. General Plan Designations: Project Slte - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Low-Medium and Medium Residential (4-8 and 5-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Low and Medium Residential (2-4 and 8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics' The protect site is on the west side of East Avenue, north of the abandoned railroad. The railroad corridor is planned as the Pacfic ElecVic Inland Empire Trail, amulti-purpose regional trail. Eucalyptus windrows are located on the north boundary and on adtoining properties. The site is undeveloped land that has been recently rough graded. The site slopes approximately 2 percent from north to south. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00544 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION Apnl 10, 2002 Page 2 ANALYSIS' A General: The Planning Commission previously approved the subdivision on December 8, 1999. The applicant is now proposing to develop 16 single-family homes v~nth floor plans ranging in size from 2,242 square feet to 2,664 square feet. The applicant is proposing three ongmal plans with eight different architectural variations. Two floor plans are single-story and the third floor plan is two-story. All plans have three-car garages The project is proposed under the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, which requires special attention to architectural style, lot layout, dnveway entry, and the rural charactenstics of the Etnvanda area The prolect has met all of the regwred standards and recommended guidelines of the Distract. B. Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project on March 19, 2002. The Committee was generally satisfied Hnth the project. The proied was conceptually approved with the conditions outlined in the minutes (Exhibit "C") An addtional condition was added to expand the porch area on the front elevations to a usable space of 6 feet in depth The applicant has agreed to all conditions. C Neiohborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on March 19, 2002. Six residents attended. The main issues were in regard to the Eucalyptus trees, which are located 4 to 5 feet off-site on the neighbors properly to the west. The existing conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 16021 regwre the developer to avoid damaging the root systems of these trees by limiting construction to a wrought iron fence or other rail fence, and prohibiting "block walls or continuous footings " The developer has been working with Jim Banks to axommodate his concerns. The residents were also concerned about the location of the home on Lot 1, which does not face East Avenue. Because of traffic engineenng concerns with the proximity to Etiwanda High School, new dnveway access is not allowed on East Avenue. The neighbors seemed generally accepting of the design of the homes. An additional concern was providing histonc street names for the Trail. The City does encourage the use of historic names within each of the three communities, however, most have already been used in the Etrvvanda area. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on March 20, 2002. Outstanding drainage issues on the south property line were resolved and added as conditions of approval E Environmental Assessment: Environmental review was completed with the tract and ongmal development review for this site and approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 1999 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects mnthin the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. There are no substantial changes in the protect or the site and its surrounding conditions that would regwre revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved tract and development review shall apply to this project. ~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00544 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION . April 10, 2002 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2001-00544 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB.EW:mlg Attachments: Exhibit °A° - Site Plan Exhibit "B° - Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit °C° - Design Review Action Comments Resolution of Approval A3 ~ ~ ~ ! ' 9 ! ~~ ~ ~ ir4 ~ a I 1 .t ,~ ~ a ~~ ~ p ~ i ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ d-i~~ A~~ Ili! p3;! q 91 g ~ ~i i ~ g~ ~ ~ 5 a. 9# ~ a ~g , tit s ~ ~ ~ {~ y gq ®t t' p ! 1 @:ttuttpt zz p~gg gg> ~. p z 8 v r p ~1 C 9 i~ 1" i i 8~F 1!~ 4_.~~~~~3 OPi! ~ip o wP8 ~~ m~ ~$:f~ p z -, ,.. ••. . ! tPc' - aese to g"° ,S31tl153 tl151A OH~NViI. ~ ~' '~o @~lnuany- tIl ~1ue~------- ------ gad~~3~~d gg9 ---- --- ------------- e ~ g- a i R~ ' ~' 5 q (~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ Z ~k 1 a Re I w ~ ~~ ~ ~ e ~ S0 ' - ~ L.L a ; ~ Z ~~ ~ U Q ~ _~ ---- ~ ' x i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ K~ ~~ - ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~~ ~ :t ~~ ~ ' ~ - ~ Z ~ - ~t @ . I ~ ~ - t tb~a 3 p4 ~ ! ~ ~~.~ § z ' ~ g A~ ~ ~ ! aREAKPASr NOOK ~~ GREAT ROOM KITCHEN MASTER BATH w,wc w mser ~ BEDROOM 2 DB+III9G ~ +`BEDROOM 4 °P1 I DEN eNTRV ii LIVING ^ MASTER BEDROOM HALL ~~ BEDROOM 5 OPTION PLAN 1 BEDROOM 3 BATH 2 3 CAR GARAGE ~ ~o BREAKFAST __ ^^ ~ my t men O FlRFRACE NOOK BEDROOM 2 MASTER KITCHEN OPTIONAL BEDROOM MASTER BA7H SITTING ROOM O - "~'" GREAT ISI.SM WALRIY ROOM III I III Q I ~ RFJ O HALL -III II IB PANiPY , y.t. l BATH 2 LL ImPN DOWN O RAR p IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~,~R = BATH LAUNDRY 0.f DINING II I. BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 4 OPEN TO BELOW i i STOPAOE I I I I ii -____= LIVING ~~ ii ;l f_7 UP II 3 CAR GARAGE ,, BEDROOM 5 ~' i i OPTION °'"' II ENTRY 1 S ECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN 5% ~.,~ BEDROOM 2 KITCHEN nne+ce MASTER BEDROOM ~ ~ OPT. RECREAT GREAT ~ ~ ROOM ivwwo ven LAUNDRY ~II~~~I~~I~I _ O ~~ ~ Q __ _ m+n POWDER 0 B ~R O EA~rrtz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ m DINING ~ ~ o Q O - - - A~NTRY . o a ~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ BEDROOMS / ~~ LIVING BEDROOM 3 1 BEDROOM 4 3 CAR GARAGE PLAN Z60 E b ~J b /~ a ~~ .. .~ ~~'1 L...J 4 0 a m t 0 V m s a~ _° v .. A~~ °"'• lLL aP~mr,~ ,D .LS.~lJJl6'O uoprup ~aa uoBO~W74BY uopYAYp Uq ~~~~ i a m 0 ~~~ c~ "~.! b ~7 ,V • / , r~ U 0 a ~~~ b a d G .a d ., a P O 0 E C O C L L ~~ L~ '~ C V I LJ 0 t ~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.40 p.m. Emily Wimer March 19, 2002 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00544 - (TT16021) - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION - A residential subdivision of 16single-family lots on 7 53 acres of land m the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and the Southern Paafic Railroad right-of-way - APN: 227-121-30 and 43. Related file: Tree Removal Permit 99-23. Background: The map was recorded on March 6, 2002, and was reviewed by Design, Grading, and Technical Review Committees on September 14, and 15, 1999 The single access design was speafically designed with the Etiwanda Speafic Plan overlay. A future stub-out street was provided at the southwestern portion of the tract to provide secondary access to the future development. Desgn Parameters: The project consists of design review for a previously approved Tract 16021, which consists of 16 single-famly lots To the west is vacant property m the Very Low Residential District and to the east are single-family homes, which are also m the Very Low Residential District. The southerly boundary is bordered by Victoria Street, and to the north is bordered by a tree Ime and partial Community Trail. The property is currently vacant and slopes 2 to 5 percent There are 114 trees on or near the subject site. An arbonst report recommends removal and replacement of the on-site windrows The windrows on the northeast corner are outside of the protect boundaries and are conditioned to not be damaged by the development. The protect consists of three floor plans. Two of the three floor plans are single-story, and all provide athree-car garage Eleven floor plans are proposed as single-story homes, and five of the floor plans are proposed as two-story homes Square footage ranges from 2,242 square feet to 2,684 square feet. The project is located within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the applicant has offset the footprint on the matonty of the homes to provide the characteristics of Etiwanda. The protect will provide the East Avenue theme wall as the tract boundary wall (stone plasters with stucco walls and river rock planters). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues• The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect. 1. The applicant has resolved and dligently worked with staff to resolve previous Mator Issues. Secondary Issues• 1. Extend chimney elements (stucco, siding, etc.) on the entire height of chimney, all four sides for a balanced appearance 2 Because of the rural characteristics of Etiwanda Avenue, Elevation B (°Madison°) shall be provided on Lot 1. ~cln i hit MC" ~~~ DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00544-CRESTWOOD CORPORATION March 19, 2002 Page 2 3. Lot 6 is a corner lot and can be seen from Brookfield Dnve. Provide a one-story floor plan on Lot 6. 4. A minor exception has been submitted for the southern boundary wall, which has a maximum height of 8 feet. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the protect, subtect to the preceding comments. Members Present: Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Emily Wimer The Committee approved the protect subtect to the revisions below: 1. Provide an expanded paved area that encompasses a 6-foot depth of porch area. 2. Extend architectural features on the full length and all sides of the chimneys. 3. Provide the rural architectural °Madison° on lot 1. The applicant agreed to the conditions and the plans wdl be revised for Planning Commission review. ~~~ RESOLUTION NO 02-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2001-00544, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR 16 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT NO 16021, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2~ DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST AVENUE AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-121-30 AND 43 A Recitals. 1. Crestwood Corporation filed an application forthe Design Review of Tract No.16021, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2. On the 10th day of April 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolutron are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on Apnl 10, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a The application applies to property located at the northwest comer of East Avenue and the Southern Pacific Railroad nght-of--way with a street frontage of 580 feet and lot depth of 650 feet and is presently undeveloped; and b. The property to the north of the subtect site is single family residential, the property to the south consists of the railroad nght-of-way (a planned multi-purpose regional trail), the properly to the east is single-family residential, and the property to the west is single-family residential and undeveloped land, and c. The application contemplates development of 16 single-family lots on 7 53 acres land within the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and d. The General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on April 10, 2002, incuding wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and R~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-39 DRC2001-00544 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION April 10, 2002 Page 2 b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance vmth each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially inlunous to properties or improvements in the viurnty 4 Environmental review was completed ~nnth the tract and original development review for this site and approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 1999 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further environmental review is required for subsequent protects within the scope ofthe Mitigated Negative Declaration. The proposed protect, 16 single-family residences, is within the scope of the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration Based upon the facts and information contained in the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with written and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds that there are no substantial changes in the protect or the site and its surrounding conditions that would require revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved tract and development review shall apply to this project 5. Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below Planning Division 1) The protect shall construct the East Avenue theme wall as the tract boundary on East Avenue (stone pilasters with stucco walls and river rock planters) per Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan 2) All pertinent conditions, inGuding environmental mitigation measures, contained in the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 16021 and Tree Removal Permit 99-23 shall apply. 3) Extend front porch slab area for a minimum of 6 feet in depth. Engineering Division 1) All applicable Conditions of Approval and Standard Conditions, including environmental mitigation measures, per Plannng Commission Resolution No 99-117 shall apply 2) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone D designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA, prior to issuance of bwlding permits A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whicheQver occurs first ~~" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-39 DRC2001-00544 - CRESTWOOD CORPORATION Apnl 10, 2002 Page 3 3) if the existing residences on East Avenue maintain then access from East Avenue, the Landscape Maintenance Distnct wdl not maintain those areas' frontages because they wtll not be sealed off with a wall nor wdl ultimate street improvements be installed. The frontage maintenance will continue to be the responsibd~ty of the adtacent homeowners Where a solid wall is constructed along East Avenue, then the ultimate street improvements can go in and the City will maintain such areas as a reverse frontage along vwth the rest of East Avenue 4) Sidewalks adtacent to walls shall be 5 feet wide (Sections F-F and G- G). If adjacent "Not-A-Part" homeowners do not agree to maintain these sideyards, they shall be rockscaped per the tentative tract conditions. Environmental Mitiaation 1) Environmental Mitigation measures contained in Planning Commission Resolution No 99-117 shall apply. 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of Apnl 2002, by the folloNnng vote-to-wd AYES. COMMISSIONERS NOES• COMMISSIONERS . ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~b MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: 1T 16021 Applicant: Jon Friedman Initial Study Prepared by: Rebecca Van Buren/Emily Wimer Date: December 8.1999 - Construct an interim water detention basin to be "` B Final map C 1 located in TT 15912. The detention basin shall be recordation completed prior to oxupancy. - Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 8 Master CE B Prior to A 2 Storm Drain facilities In East Avenue from the construction north tract boundary to and including the relocated pertnds interim basin in Tract 15912. - Install temporary asphalt sidewalk from the CE B Prior to A 1 northern boundary of the protect to Victoda construction Avenue for pedestrian safety. permits C 1 Transportation Development Fees shalt be paid in Pnor to /anticipation of a City project to install a traffic CE D construction signal at the intersection of East Avenue and permits Victoria Street - Replacement windrows of 15-gallon Eucalyptus CP D Ongoing A 1 maculate planted 8-foot on center shall be required to mitigate the loss of the mature windrows to be removed. - Install fire sprinklers in lieu of secondary access. I FC I B I Pnor to I C I 12 construction permts Key to Checklist Abbreviations ~A9S' Y ~7^4 0b ,6~K-~+~ f`Y2~EE ~ ' ~ ~ po-.. ~ ~e~w,-~ ~ld.~@`..I!"sl~[ ~.~" « ;~j i - s`Y ±~~~~,~~ g,~ii ~z; 'S YerlfcaUoa~, q ~y'~C ~~tyR,. "~'. >` `t,~ fr%e> ys t- tr .u's 3'$aI1Ct10(19~i?~;r ~.;f~'~'3.?,-w,2yy;~u' ~«~,T~~''.~,i CDD - Communlry Development Director A -With Each New Deveopment A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold RecoMaflon of Flnal Map CP -Ciry Planner or designee B - Pdor To ConsWCtlon B - Other Agenq Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Budding Permit CE -Ciry Engineer or designee C - Throughout ronatructlon C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Offldal or designee D - On Completlim D -Separate Submittal (Reports / Studlea / Plana) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Flre Chief or designee 8 -Revoke CUP f~ r1 U r1 ANCtlO c C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: Apnl 10, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY. Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00588 - WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC -The rewew of detailed site plans and bwlding elevations for 17 single-family homes on 51 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 8387 19th Street - APN. 202-021-37. Related File Tentative Tract SUBTT14162. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A Project Density: The density is 3.6 dwelling units per acre. B Surroundn o Land Use and Zoning North - 19th Street, Single-Family Residential South - Single-Family Residential East - Single-Family Residential West - Single-Family ResidentiaUCity of Upland C General Plan Designations Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics The onginal tract map was approved in August of 1992 Since the original approval there have been several time extensions to allow additional time for approval of the development of the homes The property is currently undeveloped with an existing abandoned home, which the applicant is proposing to demolish with the development of the site The site also contains 16 mature Eucalyptus trees, which will be removed with the development and replaced at a 1 to 1 ratio The surrounding land use is pnmanly single-family residential. The west property line abuts an existing water reservoir. The north property line abuts 19th Street The site slopes from north to south at approximately 4 percent ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00588 - WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC April 10, 2002 Page 2 ANALYSIS A. General• The applicant is proposing to develop 17 single-family homes with floor plans ranging m size from 2,687 to 2,794 square feet The applicant is proposing two original plans with two reverse plottmgs and three architectural styles. All plans are two-story and have three-car garages The protect is proposed under the Basic Development Standards. B. Neighborhood Meeting: The developer conducted a neighborhood meeting at City Hall on December 18, 2002. Two residents attended There were no mator concerns. The developer provided illustrative elevations which explained the type and style of homes proposed. The residents were generally accepting of the proposed protect. C Design Review Committee• The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect on February 5, 2002, and again as a Consent Calendar item on February 19, 2002. The Committee was generally satisfied with the protect at the most recent meeting. The protect was conceptually approved with two revisions The revisions were to add a third column to connect the formal front enrtryway and to provide block material and stucco surface for durability on all three columns. The applicant agreed to the conditions as stated (Exhibit °D"). D Technical Review Committee The Technical Review Committee reviewed the protect on February 6, 2002. There are no mator outstanding technical issues E Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study was completed and determined that with mitigation measures there will not be a significant adverse impact on the environment as a result of this protect. Staff recommends issuance of a Mitigated Negatroe Declaration. The site is impacted specifically by traffic and noise (Exhibit "E°). The protect will create short-term noise impacts from grading and other construction activities. The applicant was requred to submd a revised Noise Impact Analysis The recommendations of the acoustic engineer are listed as mitigation measures in the recommended conditions of approval. The applicant was also required to submit an underground Storage Tank Removal Permit Report for an abandoned gas tank All mitigation measures have been agreed to by the applicant and are included in the attached Resolution of Approval. A Tree Removal Permit was previously approved to remove all Eucalyptus trees on this property subtect to replacement RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of DRC2001-00588 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Respectfully submitted, ,B ad u / City Pf ner Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plans/ Elevations Exhibit "D" - Design Review Action Comments Exhibit °E" - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval with Conditions for DRC2001-00588 r ~ ~' ~_ `}- a VICINITY MAP .~ NOT TO SCALE aKd .-__ A~ i 0 S o~~ ~ Z n n Z~~ o r;iZZ ~' E ~ IIII F "::" ~ ~~§l E ~~~ F E ~~ ... k a IN„ ~~ ~_ r~ u ,~ u »n.~~! ~ Upsp ^ U~ ' z0 °~ ~~ P Y AL1NY! Fyt-~J L__l F L _.a.J uln0 ~ 47 z x ~ Y = r- ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ z i ~ Y ~ ~ L-IJ ~ z r-~~ ~ ~r ' ~; ~ ~ ~ ~® [~ ~U << .d U t ~ n< _ ~ V ~f h Fy ~~ O 8~ F ~ ta7 iC m ~111p1'l'rl r t, o~ zo VC m, y~ N Z a a a. ~. a$ ~, - ~< e ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~s j3 f 8 ~ 0 (i~{i~ N F m m m ~N IYWYtlYM I 1 O O (j.~' - a s`` i~ mS fm lY~~9 o_ g° o ~ Q ~ U~ O m"' 0 m m F~ a`~ O ~, ~..i z a .~ o. ~~ k~ ~~ n s > H i <~ = u D~LJ~ o^^® ~n~~ ^^~ ~o~:® ^^® ~~~® ~or~® - ~~c® fr ~. ~® ;~ ~~ _ ~ CC ~ C§~ 99 Q ~ ~q i ~~~ a ~~ ~ ^~ ~ ~~ 3 ~~ ~ ~Y p {.~~ e7 e7 F~ € 3~ 3^ ~i gp ~~ 3 ai ~ ~ d ~ g C~~ y ~ ~ (a~+]3~~~ CK~ gg "~~ pyaa ~~R Y € t Ej~ a S~Ez ~ ~i ~ pe ~ YP a 4 s ~ ` ~ ~~g~ ~ Z~Y ~~' ~ ~ ~~ ~epp ~ ~~ ~'F ~ ~ ~ ~ f Y ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~8~ 6666 ~ ~~ ~ R ~ e ~`= 5~ ~~~ r€ n - `•$R~ Y~ ~~~ ~ l ~ gg ~ ~g ~ 6 ~ x ~ R ~ ~~~ ~ °~ ¢~ g ~ ~ ~~9 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ g ~5~ ~ ~ ~~~ a ~ pg~~ g~~ ~ ~5~ 4 r z~ 3 ~ ~~ g R ~ ^~ ~I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ t ~~ ~ ~~'~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - ° v ~ ~; ~f F ? ~ WALTON- MUG11E3 ~ - ~ . ~ a _ ~{ 3 ~ 53NOfIN-NO1ltlM ! ,~ ~~ ~~ 3 d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~~~ ~J V ~_ e ~~ O 3 ~" yJj F ~ ~1~ ~'~ Q W 6 ~~-~~ r -~ : ~--. ~ ~' 4 ~a ~~ ~® 0 8 _ o r, , o a ~ IY d ~ \ ) ~ ~ ,~~ I p C ~ ~~ q O 'E1 pF r _ a ~ O ~ Y _ ~~i 2 I I I `J S3XOIIN-NO11tlM 2 n ~~ ` ~~ . ,~~ S ~~ _ i I I ~~~ iiiyyy 4 A ~88 ~3~ I I I , I e QL~J~ ~i Q~~~ ~ aoc~ ~~ 4~~~ € Q~O~ s e.. o a~~~ a _ a~~~ ° a~u~ 0 aG~~ ®o m ~ ~ g I ~3 ~ 1 z ~ ' 4 53XOf1X-NO1ltlM ~ + d ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 3 ;' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ > , " ~ ~ " '~ , :, , ~r ~~7 \ v- ® @` ~ ~~~3 B ~~ -0 Mw J W 1 `~~ C W Q ~ II ~ t PSI ~ \ ~ ~,- ~' ~I > t~ ~ ~ ~ gy~~ g g R R R ~ ~ a ~~ = ~ ~ B ~ ~9 I ~,- ® II ~ Z c ~` o t > ~ i~ J ~~ Y ~~ Y ~ 1 J W p W l ~~ <~ O a ~ 3> ~, ~ 9a ~ ~ r = C .~ ~~I~ f~~g ( a ~ ~ ~ ~ wl~~l I '~ ~~~~ 999 ~l I ~\O 'I I Pr 6 ,h ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ I LJ I ,, Y u L._J a r „ E •. ' ~ ~ saeonN-NOtivx~ • ~ 3 I 3 ~~' ' ~ i ~ ~ t~yJ s 1 \ M ~ \, ~ d / `ms _- ~~~ ~~ B ~ n I F 1~ 3 ~ ^ ' F d ~ ) Q Q 1 ~^ $ Z €€ ~ ~\ 1 ~ p •3~ 'J ~ _ r'~ ~ ~ d ~~ ; ~ e~i e ~$ ~ ~ •, ~ _ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a~ I ~ P \~ ~ ~ 15g Ri ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 1 ~, ~ e ~„ ,.~ - ~~ 8 6 ~e ~~ r ~® 2 ~ r~ p O ~ ~ f Y J `~ '~ 33 d° d r V ~, ~ yg ~ r ~9 ~p ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 --- ~ ~ _ ~ : ~ I G~ 6 _~ ' 3 ` .~„~ ~ ~~a ~ I II I ~ ~ i ~\~ ~ ~~ ~ w _ ~ ~, ~~ ~oofl '~ ;~ ~ ;~~G^ ` ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n nn n LJ I_l~ nn ~LI~O~ I ~r nn nn D~~^ r ~~1 4 C o -- 8 rt ~~ ~~ ~ S _ 3 e. ~~ ~ ~z '-}__~ _ tl~ ® 1 • p 'F = ~ ~~~ r~aa ~N ~~~ pgpgg ppypyp ~~ ~p~ g3 f3, A~~ ~ d~ a k ~~ + I i I ~ ~ ay ~A A ~ ~eR $ ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3 ~ 6~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ a ~j ~ a 3 ~ ~ ~$6 &~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" _ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ `R • , - ~ EE ~ R ~ ~~ ~ ~ 33F 33~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~iE~ ~ ~ F F ~ G Rg~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ a ~- ' ~ ~ ~d5 A ~ '~~ 33 Y~ R ? ~~ L ~t~ C F~3 N ~ CRS ..e 3 ~~ ~~ c e 9. i `~ ~~Q ~~~ • F F : `~ ^ ~~~ ~ ~ g '~~E ~ ~ ~ ~g3 ~~ ~- J c ~ 6A ~ t ~~ `] j ` ~ ~ YY 55y Y !Ep 4 3 ~ ~ 4}s i ¢p T ~~ g"~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k a~ ~ 6g@ 888 3~F F p ~g a A ~ ~i €! ~ _ ~ WALTON-M1GlES :N • ~ e A • CJ S3HOOH-NO111/M a _ 3a i ` i~ , i a~ I ~ i ~~l ~ `i ~ L~ a a8 ?', 9 r~ ,t n ~ .~ n `~ ~ ` ~ '~ i J M~ b t~ ~ gg a ~~ rfyy ki Z 0 Q W J W Q ~~~ ~ aa 3 d p~ ~ NI i J ~ ~ 1. i ~ ~ i I l' i ~y~y' fl r--- , ~ ~ ~~ a r,.- '~ ~ 6 ®© ypa I 7p'P i ~/ _- ~~p ~` ' ~ \ ~~ iNl S ~r Ef ' 1 F F ~~ F ~ > _ o i ~ ~ m d ~ r d e o ~ u a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~\~ g B • N I 9S ~y d~ ~@ ~ ~ d ,, ~~~ / p~~ C~ ° ° e n ~ _ ~~g`' _ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ 1 1 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~~ . a~ _ 'J ~ , ' ~~ < r~ ~, B ~~ `~ i ~ = O J Y` k~ I Q ~ W Q ~i-~ 3 I I I I ~, ~ ~ i ~` y ~ ~ ~ c, ~ $ € ~ r ~~ 1 e ti i ~ F ~~ € \ ;' ~~ ~ i` ~;; I ~ - ~~ `; \ I P '-` ~ ~ ~J R -~XJ~J ®® ~ ~ i~ ~~ lji ~ F > _ o f t v J V ~ ~ J W V p = ~ pF °_ Q 4 /\~ saNOnx-eonvx~ ~j 3~F y~y i 1~t~t a 3 i ~~ $ $~~~~~~ ~ $ °f B ~ g 3 ;3 IIII _ ~~ I III ~~~ ~~~~ t \ ~. 1 ~v ~` ~i NI :I e ~'i ~ ' ~ s 1 i 53NOfIN-NOITIM • ~ ~ ' ' .~ 4p '~ 1d~e~ i 3 1 `~J ~~} ~ ~\ ~k ! Y ~ T ~~ e ~ t ' ~f pq}p} Y I:g 5 ~ 1 ~ 3SF~'" ~ } F \l \ b ~ \ i ` ~~1 fir a~¢ ~ J e y 8 ..~ B ~8 i 3~~ = ° f 1 i ~ W m m C ~~-J i 9 A 't I I I I ~-. ~ ~~ p€~; ~~ ~ ~ ~~~j - ~ ~ ; P ! ~, -r- a .~, r~ . B i S'~' ~ s ~ S ® ®O ~ ~~ I~ F FS < o F e b ~ b ~ O 0 ~ t i ~ O 6 I ~`~ • !I 3 ~~I DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 30 p m Emily Wimer February 5, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00588 -HUGHES HOMES -The development of 17 single-family lots on 5 1 acres of land in the Low Residential zone (2-4 dwellings per unit), located at 8387 19th Street - APN 202-021-37 Design Parameters The site is located about on the south side of 19th street directly abutting the westerly boundary of the City To the south and east of the site are single-family residences m the Low Residential Disthct To the west are single-family residences located in the City of Upland To the north side is bordered by 19th Street The property is currently vacant and slopes 2-5 percent with no significant drainage courses, roads, coarsest, or topographical features There are 17 homes proposed on-site The square footage ranges from 2,700 to 2,800 square feet All homes provide athree-car garage Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect. 1 Provide more than a "token" effort at 360-degree architecture by carrying design features around sides and rear. For example, bnck accents, shutters, stucco quoins, window mullions, corbels, decorative tde vents Although some features can be found on side and rear elevations, their use is too sparse In many cases, the side and rear elevations are identical despite architectural style of front elevation 2 Dnveways should to narrow down to 16 feet to 18 feet (two-car width) instead of 22 feet to 25 feet (three-car width) Dnveways should be narrowed at the apron to lessen the casual impact Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time pennitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Plans 2B and 2C - provide a front column m the middle of the family room window, m the center of the front porch To utilize front yard views, lower the height of the column and position it to the side of the window The column can then support the awning at the roof-line 2 Color Scheme 5 has a very minute change of color between the fasaa and the tnm as well as no stone tnm To distingwsh a separation of colors, provide a deeper stucco color to offset the predominantly white color scheme 3 Upgrade for comer lots, including window mullions, shutters and additional architectural features 4 Incorporate accent colors for tnm, stucco bands, and quoins to allow visual relief • 5 Provide larger shutters (Elevation "C") to match the width of the windows 6 Provide a faux window on the garage side elevation of Plan 1 and 2 7 ~/Plyanlt 2 1 slope on Lot 9 ~\~ ~~~ 4/~ 1 ~~II DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00588 -HUGHES HOMES February 5, 2002 Page 2 Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the protect design without discussion 1 Wood Penang shall be treated with stain, paint or water seal 2 Return walls and comer side-walls should be decorative and compatible with the architectural style 3 Provide decorative penmeter fencing at tract boundanes along streets. "Decorative" is defined as stucco finish, split face block or similar textured surface Smooth precision block is not acceptable Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the protect, subtect to the changes recommended herein. Design Review Committee Action Members Present Lany McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Emily Wimer The Committee approved the protect subtect to the revisions below 1 Prowde porch entry with extended courtyard, which may include but not be limited to decorative hardsa3pe, planter areas, and decorative columns, etc 2 Provide corbels on the second story rear elevation This element should look as it if is supporting the 2-foot pop-out feature of the second story. 3 Provide two 2-foot wide shutters where applicable, (example Elevation 1 C). 4 Provide typical upgrades on rear elevations (including belly bands, window mullions, stucco tnm, etc ) 5 Revise color scheme 5 to allow a greater vanation of color between stucco and tnm. 6 Revise elevations to include closed shutters required on the side elevations (garage side elevation) 7 Provide elevation of return walls with coordination stucco colors to match 8 Enhance fireplaces with stucco inlay and contrasting tnm color 6ao DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7 00 p m Emily Wimer February 19, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2001-00588- HUGHES HOMES -The development of 17 single-family lots on 5 1 acres of land in the Low Residential Zone (2 to 4 dwellings per unit), located at 8387 19th Street - APN 202-021-37 PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING Design Review Committee Action: Members present Larry McNiel, John Mannenno, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Emily Wimer The Design Review Committee conceptuallyapproved the project subtect to the revisions presented at the meeting One outstanding condition was that the courtyard area be revised and expanded with a low planter to illustrate the useable area This revision will be presented to the Planning Commission. 6a~ ENVIRONMENTAL - INFORMATION FORM City of Rancho Cuwmonpa (Part I -Initial Study) Planning Dmsron (909)477-2750 - r - The purpose,of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may'review the project pursuant~to City policies ordinances! _and guidelines; the California°Environmental Quality Act; aril the City Rules and Procedures to Implement CEClA. It-is important~thaf the information requested iri this.application be provided-in full. ''~ ~ `` --- - - n -~ ' .< _ INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensurn that the appl~cahon is complete at the time of submittal, City stall wdl not be available to peAorm work roquired to provide missing in/ormabon Application Number /or the pro/ect to which this form peRams Protect Tdle DRC2001-00588 No title at this time Name 8 Address o/pro/ect Walton Develocment LLC owner(s) p,0. Box 336 Glendora CA 91740 Name 8 Address of developer or pro/ect Walton Develognent LLC sponsor P.O. Box 336 Glendora CA 91740 Contact Person 6 Address Tan Hughes P.O. Box 336 lendora CA 91740 V O~ • . Name & Address of person prepanng this form (d different imm above) 8387 19th Street Telephone Number Information md~cated by astensk (') rs not required of non-construction CUP=s unless otherwise 2quested by stall '1) Prewde a full scale (&12 x 11) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pre/ect site, and md~cate the site boundanes 2) Provide a set o/color photographs which show representative wews into the site Irem the north, south, east and west, wews into and from the sde from the pnmary access points which serve the site, and representative wews o/srgnnc~ant lectures /rom the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pro/ect Location (descnbe) South side of 19th Street at the westerly boundary of the City. 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet d necessary) 'S) Gross Sde Area (ac/sq ft ) 5.112 acres 0202-021-37 n/a 222,678 sq. ft. B) Net Srte Area (total sde size minus area o/public streets & proposed dedications) 3.552 acres 154,725 sg. ft. 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the prefect site (attach additional sheet r/necessary ~a3 • 8) Include a descnphon o/all permits which will be necessary /rom the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the protect Demolition tree reroval grading sewer water street urmmvement, wall, retaining wall, building, landscape 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as d exists before the protect mcludmg rnfonnahon on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existing structures on site (mcludmg age and cond~6on) and the use of the shuctures Attach photographs of significant /eatures described In addition, site all sources of information (~ a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, brot~c and aroheolog~cal surveys, haffic studies) The site is currently vacant with the exception of an older house and outbuildings constructed in the 1920's. All are in very poor crondition. The site has several miscellaneous varities of trees around the house of VarV1RO SlZe and most are_in___mnr mndi tion ThPrw ara acvaral lar~pP eucalyptus trees near the westerly boundary that are scheduled to be removed. The site is relatively flat and slopes to the south/southeast. The site is surrounded by existing residential except for the North where 19th Street is located. The soils testing that has been car~leted indicates the site is entirely appropriate for the residential use that is proposed. 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/or hrstonca/ospects of the site Srte all sources o/in/ormabon (books, published reports and oral history) Originally was a small citrus operation. Cl~rrently vacant land overgrown with weeds. There exists no record of any historical s>_gnificance. 170 _\ . .~.._....~,~ .............. u,rr.,,,.„~..T... ,rim.. ~,..~ o.,....o • - 11)Descnbe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (airoratt, roadway noise, etc) and how they will atlect proposed uses No significant aircraft noise. Some roadway noise fn-xn 19th Street that may be a minor annoyance for the houses that back up to that street. 12) Descnbe the proposed proled in detail This should prowde an adequate descnpbon o/the site in terms o/ ultimate use which will result /rom the proposed pro/act Indicate i/then: am proposed phases for development, the extent o/development to occur with each phase, and the anhcipated complehon o/each increment Attach add~bonal sheet(s) if necessary There will be 17 new haries built on the site. The square footages will be approximately 2700 and 2800 square £eet. All homes will have 3-car garages and most will have the opportunity for R.V. parking at the side of the garages. The grading and street ur~rovements will be done in one phase and hopefully will begin February of 2002. The homes will be built in one phase with completi in October or November 2002. 13)Descn6e the surrounding properties, including information on plants end animals and any cultural, histoncal, or scenic aspects lnd~cate the type o/land use (residential, commeroial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apeRment houses, shops, department stows, etc) and scale o/development (height, (rootage, setback, rear yart1, etc ) Project is surrounded on three sides by existing residential housing of varying age. All is single fartuly and this pro0ect will conform in height and scale to existing subdivision to the west of the project. 14)Will the proposed protect change the pattern, scale orcharacterofthe surrounding general area o/the pro/ect~ No ~6as i ~n~ ~1,1.II\In\CIAIp11Cl~O~~M/`/1111.ITCOII~IITCTn/ 1~Ipn O/nn pnnn 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods o/sound proofing are proposed Normsl construction activity noises initially during approved working hours only and eventually only normal sounds from residential living activities. '18) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature orscenrc trees All existing trees on Site are to be removed. Landscaping will be done along 19th Street per City regu~.rsnents. Street trees will be provided per requirements and all front yards will be landscaped. 17) Indicate any bodes of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams None 1B)Ind~cate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For (uRher clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) 10, 200 Peak use (gaUday) 20, 400 b CommemiaUlnd (gaUday/ac) n/a Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 19)Ind~cate proposed method o/sewage disposal Septic Tank ~ Sewer I/septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficat~on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Drstnct at 987- 2591 a Residential (gal/day) 4590 gallons b CommeraaUlnd (gaUday/ac) n/a RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units 17 Detached (indicate range o/parcel srzes, minimum lot size and maximum lot sze 7163 so. ft. (lot 12) 12337 sq. ft. (lot 5) C~a~ ~J Attached (indicate whether units an= rental or for sale units) n/a 21)Anhcipated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) g 360, 000 to $ 380, 000 Rent (per month) $ n/a to $ n/a 22)Specdynumberofbedroomsbyumttype Plan 1 - 4 bedrooms Plan 2 - 4 bedrooms 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type Planl-4to5 Plan 2 - 24)lndicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the protect Contacf the appropnate School Distncts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary 18 b Jurnor High 9 c Senior High 11 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(s) and major /uncbon(s) of commercial, indus[nal or insMubonal uses 26) Total floor area o/commercial, industnal, or instdubonal uses by type ~i 27) Indicate hours o/operehon '~'pically construction activities will be from l a m to 5 n m daily except Sundays and most GAr„rr3ava_ 28) Number o/ Total n/a employees Maximum Shdt Time o/Maximum Shdt 29)Prowde breakdown of anhapated/ob classificahons, mcludmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an md~cahon o/the rate o/hire /or each classficahon (attach addrhonal sheet dnecessary) n/a 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currentty resde m the City n/a '31)For commero~al and mdustnal uses only, indicate the source, type end amount of air pollution em~ss~ons (Data should be venfied through the South Coast Av Quality Management D~stnct, at (818) 572-6283) n/a ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agenaes serving fhe pro/ect been contacted to determine theirabddy to provide adequate service to the proposed pro/ect~ I/ so, please md~cate their response Yes -all of the agencies have indicated they can provide the necessary services for this subdivision. ~,a~ • In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge oI hazardous and/or toxic ma[enals~ 33)Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but am not limited to PCB=s, red~oacbve substances, pesbcides and herbicides, /eels, als, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any o/the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates o/ use, i/ known No hazax3ous or toxic materials have been used on this site. There had been a small underground storage tank on the site which was empty. It was removed according to requiranents and the soil in the area tested negative for hydrocarbons. 34) W11 the proposed protect involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above 1/yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The locahon o/such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cabon plans No I hereby certify that the statements /umished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and inlormabon required for adequate evaluabon of this protect to the best o/my ability, that the facts, statements, and in/ormahon presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge end belie/ I further understand that addihonal in/ormahon may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluabon can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamojr§~ 6 Date 09/14/01 Signatun; Title "Thomas M. Hughes Vice President ~,a~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: DRC 2001-00588 2. Related Files: SUBTT 14162 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC 2001-00588 (HUGHES HOMES)- The development of 17 single family lots on 5 1 acres of land in the Low Residential Zone (2-4 dwelling per acre), located at 8387 19'" Street - (APN 202-021-37) 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Walton Development LLC P O Box 336 Glendora, CA 91741 5. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low Density Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Tract 14162 was recorded on this site on September 1, 2000, establishing the 17 lots on the 5-acre parcel The site contains an existing single-family house, a detached garage, and two small storage sheds, and is surrounded by single-family residential development to the east, west and south, and 19"' Street to the north followed by residential development Several eucalyptus trees occur near the western property boundary, and other tree varieties occur onsite. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required State Water Quality Control Board/Regional Water Quality Control Board Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and NPDES Permit 6 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated;' or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (/) TransportaboNCirculafton / ()Land Use and Planning (/) Biological Resources ( )Public Services (/) PopulaLOn and Housing (/) Uhhhes and Sernce Systems (/) Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources () Aesthebcs (/) Water (/) Hazards ()Cultural Resources (/) Fvr Quality (/) Noise (/) Recreation / Mandato Fmdm s of Si nificance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed• ~ l~J ( Emily Wime Assistant Planner March 18, 2002 i ~3~ r~ L.J Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified PaenWny Silitefi®nt Impaa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotmUally unless Than SipNfirant ALhpa00n Slgrvfifanl No l a in tea l n I a LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () () (~) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (~) policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (~) vicimty~ d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (~) established community Comments: a-d) The project site is located on the south side of 19"' Street, approximately 185 feet east of Baywood Way and immediately north of Hamilton Street The site and surrounding area are within the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) The applicant has proposed the development of 17single-family homes within a previously recorded Tract (14162) that subdivided the 5-acre site into 17 lots (3 4 units per acre), with lot sizes ranging from 7,163 and 12,337 square feet No increase in density or amendment to the previously recorded subdivision map is proposed, therefore no land use impacts will result from the project. POtMWIIy Sipnlfimnt ~ L Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pamfiaily u~ess T h an Sipnfiont MlGpaeon Sgnfirant No I a tea 1 a I a 2. POPl1LATIONANDHOl1SING. Would the proposal a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (~) population projections b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (~) directly or indirectly (e g ,through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () (~) ( ) housing ~3a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00588 Page 4 Comments: a-b) The protect consists of the development of 17 single-family homes within the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per area) The protect site is located on the south side of 19'" Street approximately 185 feet east of Baywood Way and immediately north of Hamilton No increase in density or amendment to the previously recorded tract map is proposed, therefore, the protect will not result in a change in population protections The Cucamonga County Water Distnct confirmed they have the ability to provide adequate sewer and water service for the protect c) Proposed protect includes the development of 17 single-family homes in accordance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Code Residential Design Guidelines Proposed development includes the demolition of one existing single-family house The removal of the existing house will allow development of 17 new single-family homes The impact is not considered significant Polentielly Sipn~fimnt ~ T S Issues and Supporting Information Sources rotmtally un i~ lw n Sipmficanl ALOg30an Sigiufi®nt No I ct In teE I p I d 3. GEt7Ll~GIC PF20BLEMS. Would the proposal result m or expose people to potential impacts mvolwng• a) Fault ruptures () () () (~) b) Seismic ground shakings () () (~) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactions O O O (~) d) Seiche hazards O O O (~) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (~) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () () () (~) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (~) h) Expansive soils () () () (~) i) Unique geologic or physical features () () () (~) Comments: a-b) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Alquist-Pnolo Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within two miles southeast of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies within two miles northwest of the site These faults are both capable of producing Moment Magnitude (M„,) 6 0 - 7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7 5 earthquakes is approximately 13 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to My, 8 2 earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeast of the site 633 ~J • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00588 Page 5 Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhenng to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant c) Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less soils are subject to ground shaking dunng an earthquake of large magnitude Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface Based on ground water depths within the area (approximately 400 feet below surface grade), the potential for liquefaction within the project area is unlikely Adhenng to the City grading standards, and the Uniform Building Code, will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant d) The site is not located near a body of water The nearest Flood Control facilities are the Cucamonga Basins located less than half mile west of the site, and Demens Channel located 1/8 mile west of the site Given the distance and confinement of these ephemeral water bodies, development of the project site will not expose people or structures to any potential impacts Additionally, the site is not within a 100-year flood plain as shown on Figure V-5 of the City's General Plan e) The site is relatively flat therefore grading will be minimal and will provide the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage . f) The topography will be altered to accommodate the protect as a majority of the site is vacant with only one single-family residence Grading will be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer f-h) Sod type at the site and in the vicinity is Tulunga gravelly loamy sand (TvC). The Tulunga series consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping soils that formed on alluvial fans in granitic alluvium Sods are present at slopes of 0 to 9 percent in elevations ranging from 1,000 to 2,000 feet These sods are rapidly permeable Runoff is very slow and the hazard of water erosion is slight The City's General Plan indicates that most soil types in the City are very adaptable to land development and are not of an expansive nature i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features amr»,o~ny $igrvfimni " Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolmLOlly u ~ Tl~n Signfiranl ALtlgaOOn Slpnlfltant No I h Inm (M I of I C 4. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (~) ( ) or the rate and amount of surtace water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (~) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (~) of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) 6~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Pamuany Sprvfirant aryed Lea Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pwen^aur unlea Than Signfinnl fi46ga4on Siprvficant No I a In IeE I a I a d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (~) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (~) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (~) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? () () () (~) h) Impacts to groundwater quality i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ( ) groundwater othervvise available for public water supplies O O (~) O O (~) Comments• a) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the site The developer will be required to channel the surface runoff from the site to 19"' Street and into existing and proposed catch basins and storm drains The final drainage plan and report must be approved by the City Engineer The impact is not considered significant. b) Based on Exhibit V-5 of the City's General Plan, the project site is outside of the 100-year flood plain c-e) As a standard condition of protect approval, the applicant must prepare a preliminary drainage study showing how stormwater runoff will be conveyed. A final report will be required prior to issuance of grading permits Since grading onsite will exceed five acres, the applicant must prepare a Stonn Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The applicant must also submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the state's General NPDES Permit, which is administered by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) The SWRCB will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or storrnwater conveyance channels BMPs would include, but are not limited to street sweeping of paved roads during construction, and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion during the rainy season The following mitigation measure will be implemented to ensure impacts from water runoff and erosion is less than significant x,35 • Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs to be implemented during the period the site is under construction. BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. A final grading plan will be prepared in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and post- construction Approval of grading plans and conditions applied to the protect by the City Engineer to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP will make this impact less than significant f-Q The project wdl not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge Iw~aeny 9pnifi®nt Iced Las Issues and Supporting Information Sources aamwliy wlas rez~ Siprvfi®nt IMO~Oan Slpnifi®nt No I a I tee I I 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contnbute to () (~) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () () (~) ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (~) cause any change in climate? d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (~) Comments: a-b) The proposed protect was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unrfied Air Pollution Control Distnct, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distnct, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Disthd (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects The cntena pollutants screened for inGuded. reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6"' edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model In order to reflect the residential nature of the proposed protect, the default fleet mix was modified to increase the number of light passenger vehicles and decrease the number of medium and heavy-duty diesel trucks The post-construction emissions will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of signficance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the protect contnbution to regional emission of cntena pollutants ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Generally, construction of a protect this size will not exceed SCAQMD thresholds durng grading activities for PM,o and NO^, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (post-construction) for NO. Tables 1 and 2 show protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented During grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) wdl be generated Existing single-family residences surround the site Since the region is innon-attainment for PM,o, and since there are sensitive receptors adjacent to the site, fugitive dust wdl be mitigated by the following measures• 2. The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 3. Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 4. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 5. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Dunng construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by equpment traveling over exposed surfaces wdl increase NOx and PM,a levels in the area The following mitigation measures wdl ensure impacts'to sensitive receptors are at less than significant levels 6. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high~nergy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 7. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use. r1 U n 634 ~~ ~_~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Demolition - - - - - - 6 30 6 30 Gradin 3 75 3 75 50.02 47 52 - - 14 64 7 36 Worker Tn s 0 10 0 10 0 14 0 14 0 27 0 27 0.03 0 03 Stations E w 034 034 0 27 0 27 - - 0.02 0 02 Mobile E ui 1.28 1.22 13 60 12 92 - - 0 87 0 83 Arch Coatin s 54 59 51 86 - - - - - - As halt 0 52 0 50 - - - - - - Totals 60 58 57 57 64 04 60 86 0 27 0 27 21 86 8 23 SCAQMD Thres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si rnficance No No No No No No No No As shown in Table 2, post-construction activities wtll not exceed SCAQMD thresholds Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6'~ edition values, the URBEMIS7G model estimates vehicle tnps assoaated with a designated land use The proposed protect includes the development of 17 single- famdy lots Based on the number of lots and residential land use, the ITE assocates a tnp rate of 11 95 tnps per day per dwelling umt. Approximately 203 taps are associated with the protect This amount of traffic is minimal and will generate - 30.55 pounds of CO emissions per day Traffic associated with the protect was pro)ected to occur in the area as the site is designated Low Density Residential and is expected to generate related traffic taps Emissions associated with these vehicle tnps are below SCAQMD thresholds (Table 2) Table 2 Post Construction Emissions (Pounds per Dav) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet Met Unmet Mit. Unmet. Met Unmet Mit. Area Source 0 85 0 85 0 21 0 20 0 09 0 08 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 3 40 3 40 2 45 2 45 30 55 30.55 1 45 1 45 Totals 4 25 4 25 2 66 2 65 30 64 30 63 1 45 1 45 SCAQMD Thres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si mficance No No No No No No No No c-d) The proposed protect is the development of 17 single-family homes at a density of 3 4 units per acre, in accordance with the Low Density Residential Distract of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The end use of the proposed protect will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors. ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 PotMhally signfirant Inpact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PrnMhally unless Thzn Slgnifinnt MNgahon Sigrvfimnt No I cl In IeE I cl I ci 6. TRANSPORTATIONICIRCULATION. Would the proposal result ~n a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () () (~) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , () () () (~) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (~) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-sites () () () (~) e) Hazards or bamers for pedestnans or bicyclists () () () (~) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (~) alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rail or air traffic impacts O O U (~) Comments• $ J~ The proposed protect includes the development of 17 single-family homes Based on the number of lots and residential land use, the ITE associates a tnp rate of 11 95 taps per day per dwelling unit Based on this tnp rate, the proposed protect will generate 203 taps per day Primary access to the site is provided by 19'" Street The proposed protect is consistent with the goals of the General Plan that designates the area Low Densely Residential. The protect proponent will be required to construct the necessary street improvements, as contained in the conditions of approval for the protect, and pay traffic impact fees as established by the Clty Council to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect. b-d) Access to the site will be provided from Nineteenth Street and Hamilton Street into the tract The proposed access points will allow full access without impeding the through traffic along Nineteenth Street Jade Drive terminates at the east property line and will not continue through at the present time Access for emergency vehicles will be adequate with a cut-de-sac turn around radius of 37 feet and street widths of 36 feet (curb to curb) e/f) The proposed home development will not cause a hazard or bamer to pedestnans or cyclists as adequate points of ingress/egress will be provided and adequate parking will be provided within the proposed driveways and garages No bus turnouts are proposed g) Located approximately five miles north of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft 6~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DRC 2001-00588 Page 11 Polenbally sigrufit3nt ~ Issues and Supporting Infonnatlon Sources PmenOany u « ~n Sigmfignt MNpabon 9Bnificant No I h In tea 1 C I d 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result m impacts to• a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (~) habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated speaes (e g., heritage trees, () () (~) ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () () () (~) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~ • d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () () () (~) vernal pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration comdors~ () () () (~) Comments: d) The site contains one existing single-family residence, a detached garage and two small sheds The site is surrounded by existing neighborhoods to the east, west and south To the north is 19'~ Street followed by residential development Based on review of the Phase I Site Assessment prepared by CTL Environmental Services in March 2001, and aerial photographs of the site dating from 1949 to 1968, the site was primarily used as an orchard and contained one residence The 1977 aerial photograph shows the site still occupied by the house but the orchard is no longer present At a recent site visit, it appeared the site had been disked for the past several years Due to the disturbed nature of the site and surrounding development, the site does not contain adequate habitat for any endangered speaes Additionally, as identified on Exhibit IV-3 of the City's General Plan, the site is not located In an area of sensitive biological resources b-c) Several mature trees are present onsite. There are several large eucalyptus trees near the westerly border that will need to be removed in order to accommodate site development Many of the tree speaes are in declining health and appear to have survived on rainfall as other vegetation onsite is also non-imgated and dry The applicant is required to submit an application for a Tree Removal Permit and pay necessary fees Trees scheduled for removal will be replaced with trees of appropriate size and quantity per the City's Development Code The impact is not considered significant . d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site e) Existing residential development is located east, west and south of the site. To the north of the site is 19"' Street followed by residential development Surrounding development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past ~` , O Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 PolenWlly Siyufie3nt Issues and Supporting Informatlon Sources Pdmbally u~e s TLn~an Significant Mippebon S'Bnifiranl No I d In lee I d I d 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal• a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (~) plans b) Use non-renewable resources m a wasteful and () () () (~) inefficient manner c) Result m the loss of availability of a known () () () (~) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments: a-b) The protect will be regwred to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation c) The protect site is located m an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2) An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has detennined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization Additionally, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan does not identify the area as occumng m an aggregate extraction resource area (Exhibit IV-2, General Plan) vaenlwny SlpNficanl Issues and Supporting Informatlon Sources raeamuy u ~ 71~n siprficant Abbgeban 9gnfi(ant No I a m lee I a I n 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A nsk of acadental explosion or release of () () (~) ( ) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (~) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (~) health hazard LJ • d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () (~) () ( ) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (~) brush, grass, or trees V"1 • Irntial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Comments: a/d) In February 2001, CTL Environmental Services (CTL) conducted a Phase I Site Assessment for the protect site to identify current and historical storage, use and/or release of hazardous materials from the site The following is a summary of the report prepared by CTL. Based on review of aerial photographs, the site contained orchards and asingle- family residence from the 1920's to the late 1960's By the mid 1970's, the orchards had been removed, but the house remains today During a site inspection, evidence of an underground storage tank (possible dispenser and vent pipe) were observed Upon excavation, a 500-gallon tank was discovered. In March 2001, the applicant submitted an application for removal of the tank with the County of San Bernardino County Fire Department The tank was removed and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations The tank was found empty, and appeared to have contained gasoline at one time Soil samples were collected dunng the excavation of the tank and analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) by EPA Method 8015-M, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, zylenes, (BTEX), and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) by EPA Method 8021. Soil samples collected below the former diesel underground storage tank exhibited no detectable concentrates of TPH-d, BTEX, or MTBE Based on soil sample results and proper removal of the underground storage tank, the proposed residential development wdl not be expose to hazardous materials assoaated with the former underground storage tank Dunng the site assessment, inspection of the house onsite revealed the presence of suspected asbestos containing matenal including acoustical ceiling matenal, sheet flooring/mastic, plaster, drywall, drywall mud, and roofing matenal The existing residence onsite was constructed in the 1920's When left alone, asbestos within these products is harmless However, dunng demolition asbestos-containing material may become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by forces that act on the matenal dunng the course of demolition operations In this form asbestos may be released into the environment Asbestos is a known carcinogen and certain precautions need to be taken to ensure the matenal is removed properly prior to demolition The Clean Air Act of 1970 regwres the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop and enforce regulations to protect the general public from exposure to airborne contaminants that are known to be hazardous to human health In accordance with Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, EPA established National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants to protect the public Asbestos was one of the first hazardous air pollutants regulated under Section 112 The Asbestos National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR, Subpart M) addresses milling, manufacturing and fabricating operations, demolition and renovation activities, waste disposal issues, active and inactive waste disposal sites Qya Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 The asbestos removal regulations contained in the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants requires faality owners involved in demolition actrvities to control emissions of particulate asbestos to the outside air as no safe concentration of airborne asbestos has ever been established The pnmary method used to control asbestos emissions is to adequately wet the asbestos- containing matenal with a wetting agent pnor to, dunng and after demolition actrvities The following mitigations measures, developed in accordance with requirements set forth in Air Quality Management Distnct (AQMD) Rule 1403 "Asbestos Emissions From Demolition/Renovation Activities," will ensure release of asbestos dunng demolition activities is minimized 9. The facility shall be thoroughly surveyed by a California Occupational Health and Safety Act (Cal/OSHA) certified asbestos inspector for the presence of asbestos prior to any demolition activities. The survey shall include inspection, identification, and quantification of all asbestos-containing material. 10. If the facility is found to contain asbestos, the asbestos-containing material shall be removed prior to demolition in accordance with procedures outlined in AQMD Rule 1403 (1)(D) and handled in accordance with Rule 1403 (1)(E). The SCAQMD shall be notified at least ten working days prior to demolition. b) The proposed protect includes 36-foot (curb to curb) street widths that will provide adequate access for emergency response vehicles c) The proposed residential development will not pose a threat to public health and safety with respect to hazardous materials or increased fire hazards e) Development of the 17 single-family homes would incude street improvements along 19"' Street and within the intenor of the tract, extension of water service, and adequate fire suppression equipment within the area These improvements will reduce fire hazards within the area Polen4ally Slpvfitlnl liryaa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Fote,lullr u"less Tnsn $Igmficanl NLtlgatlon $Ipnlfltanl No I C In tetl I C I C 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result m' a) Increases in existing noise levels O O (~) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () (~) () ( ) Comments: a) George E Leighton prepared an Acoustical Analysis for the site in August 1990 The report was revised in March 2002 to address possible changes in the noise • 6`-'~3 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 environment surrounding the site The following is a summary of findings presented in the report Environmental noise levels typically fluctuate over time, and different types of noise descriptors are used to account for this vanabtlity The most useful noise descriptors measure time-averaged noise levels representing various times of the day as sensitivity to noise increases/decreases (sensitmty to noise increases dunng evening and night-time hours) The following are definitions of the terminology commonly used to describe noise and noise related impacts CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) -The average egwvalent A-weighted sound level dunng a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of approximately five deabels to sound levels in the evening from 7 00 p m. to 10:00 p m and ten deabels to sound levels in the night before 7 00 a m and after 10 00 p m • d6(A) (A-Weiohted Sound Pressure Level) -The sound pressure level, in deabels, as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighting filter network The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency component of the south, plaang greater emphasis on those frequenaes within the sensitivity range of the human ear The most common sounds vary between 40 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very load) Normal conversation at three feet is roughly at 60 dBA, while loud tet engine noises equate to 110 dBA Leo (Eouvalent Continuous Sound Level) -the sound level corresponding to a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over a given sample period Leq is the "energy" average noise level dunng the time period of the sample and can be measured for any time period, but is typically measured for 1 hour This one- hour noise level can also be referred to as the Hourly Noise Level (HNL) It is the energy sum of all the events and background noise levels that occur dunng that time period Lmax and Lmin -The maximum and minimum A-weighted sound levels measured on a sound level meter, dunng a designated time interval, using fast time averaging. The conceptual grading plan was examined to determine the external site noise levels with a proposed six-foot high perimeter noise bamer wall Noise sources examined at the project site inGuded the following • 19'" Street traffic, • Cucamonga County Water District Reservoir site noise, and • New Highway 30 (Interstate 210 extension) Noise generated from 19`" Street traffic was examined using the worst-case analysis, maximum existing traffic counts and homes to be constructed nearest to the I-210 right-of-way A maximum 60 CNEL was a3lculated using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) model As the new I-210 is phased in, this noise level will be reduced Noise generated from the Cucamonga County Water District Reservoir site, located 17 feet from the western property line, was surveyed at the a~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00588 Page 16 nearest property line with all pumps operating With asix-foot high noise barner in- place, a 48 dBA noise level was calculated This level combined with traffic noise, will result in a 59 CNEL noise level with an Lmax of 57 dBA (one-hour) steady-state noise, as recorded at the west property line of the site Noise generated from the proposed Highway 30 (new Interstate 210 extension) was denved using the existing traffic data for the Interstate 210 Freeway. The proposed freeway is recessed 30 feet below grade and is 0 2 miles north of the site Given the distance of the reservoir and three blocks of intervening residential development, noise expected from the proposed highway will be 35 CNEL Based on existing and proposed noise levels, the extenor noise environment at the site meets the City's 60 CNEL critenon with asix-foot high noise barner in place around the development Therefore no interior noise analysis is regwred and no additional extenor noise mitigation is regwred Construction related short-term noise levels would be higher than existing ambient noise levels in the protect area, but will cease once construction of the protect is completed The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to adlacent sensitive receptors from short-term construction related noise are at less than sign cant levels 11. During all project site excavation and grading onsite, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufFlers consistent with manufacturers' standards. 12. The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 13. During project construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in noise levels at adjacent properties to exceed the noise standards specified in the Development Code, to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction is permitted on Sundays and Government Code holidays. b) The proposed prolect is the development of 17 single-family homes on the south side of 19"' Street, approximately 185 feet east of Baywood Way The additional 203 travel tnps per day may incrementally increase ambient noise levels at the proposed site However, based on the Low Density Residential designation and lot sizes ranging from 7,163 to 12,337 square feet, future traffic noise in the area is not predicted to exceed City noise limits Therefore this impact is considered less than sigrnficant r~ U ays Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Po~mva~y 9ptlficant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Prnemanr u~ss Than Siprufirant MNpafim Sipnifi,ant No Inpad Incoryaatetl Inpatl Irryacl 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas• a) Fire protections () () () (r) b) Police protections () () () (~) c) Schools () () (~) ( ) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () (~) ( ) e) Other governmental services () () () (~) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The protect site is located on the south side of 19'~ Street approximately 185 east of Baywood Way and is served by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract The nearest fire station is located on the east stile of Amethyst Street lust north of 19"' Street approximately 1.5 miles travel distance east of the protect site The Distract is responsible for evaluating the protect through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process The proposed protect will inGude structural fire protection standards contained in the Uniform Fire Code. Therefore, no mitigation is regwred Police Protection -Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Shenff's Department The proposed residential development will include standard secunty devices such as street lighting, and locks on all windows and doors Additional police protecton is not required as the addition of 17single-family residential homes will not have a substantial increase in the area to be patrolled as the proled site is small, approximately 5 acres, in proportion to the existing surrounding development Schools -The Alta Loma School Distract and the Chaffey Joint High School Distract serve the protect area Both school distracts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay the school impact fees With this condition, impacts to the School Distracts are considered to be less than significant Public faalities -The proposed residential development will not significantly increase traffic on adjacent streets and it is consistent will the City's Low Density Residential distract The protect proponent will be regwred to construct necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Counal to off-set the incremental increase in traffic as a result of the protect Therefore, this impact is considered to be less than significant 6~t Initial Study for DRC 2001-00588 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 PotrnWlly SiBnifiwnl ~ ' T Issues and Supporting Information Sources Parnt~ally u ° ess wn SlBmfiwnt MNgaban Signifiwnl No I C Inw letl 1 c1 I tt 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utdd~es• a) Power or natural gasp () () () (~) b) Communication systems O O O (~) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (~) facddies~ d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (~) e) Stonn water drainages () () (~) ( ) f) Solid waste disposals () () () (~) g) Local or regional water supplies () () () (~) Comments: a-g) The proposed development of 17 single-family homes will require extension of existing utilities available in the immediate area Utility systems installed to serve existing development within the area are adequate, and will not require mator modifications or alterations Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. The proled will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and rooftops proposed A Drainage Report will be required to address protected storm flows and proposed storm drain construction Drainage Plans must be included in application submittals in addition to the Final Drainage Report for Building Official review and approval. The impact is less than significant Pwtntl>,ny S~gniflwnt ~ ~ L Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pwenbeflr Un~es s T n en Sigrnfiwnt Mlbgbfion SIBNfiwnt Na I d I iM I d I d 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal• a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways O O O (~) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () () (~) c) Create light or glares () () () (~) Comments: a-b) The protect site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway view corridor The . area is designated Low Density Residential, the proposed protect is consistent with the Development Code for this district `r • • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00588 Page 19 c) The prolect will create additional light and glare as a majority of the site is vacant with the exception of asingle-family residence that has been at the site since the 1920's The proposed prolect includes the construction of 17 single-family homes The site has been identified as an area to include residential development under the General Plan New light will be typical of a small residential neighborhood and would not significantly affect sensitive receptors such as other existing residential development in the area Poten4ally Sigrofitlnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources votam~afir u~ass Tl~n Signfiamt M14gabon Signfi®nl No I m tea I a I a 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb Paleontological resources () () () (~) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (~) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () () (~) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (~) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (~) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources Additionally, the site is located in an area that is surrounded by development and to date, no resources have been uncovered in the vicinity of the prolect site Furthermore, the site is not listed on the Designated and Potential Historical Site List for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (revised August 2001) The site was review by the City of Rancho Cucamonga last year and has been in a dilapidated state since the review The home has been altered several times from it's original floor plan with room additions and exterior modifications Therefore, no impacts are anticipated to occur Potm4ally SlpNfiranl Issues and Supporting Infonmation Sources awen4ellr Inpaa Imless Less Ttlan Signlfimnt MiUgdbon Signifipnt No I a In tad I a I a 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities Comments: O O (~) O 6~~ Imtiai Study for DRC 2001-00588 a) The proposed 17single-family homes will generate approximately 50 new people to the area Impact fees are collected at the time of bwlding permit issuance Therefore, the new residential community will not adversely impact local parks or recreational opportunities b) The proposed protect will be constructed on vacant land, which is designated Low Density Residential The area surrounding the protect site is designated residential and has been previously developed Potmbally Signlfirent Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potmbally uN'~ess ,`n"an SipNfimnl ~Abgdbm 9gnfi®n1 NO I a In tea I a I a City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor penods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive penod of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects ) (°) (~) r 1 r1 (~) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (~) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly ~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00588 Page 21 Comments: a) The site is surrounded by existing neighborhoods to the east, west and south To the north is 19'" Street followed by residential development Based on review of the Phase I Site Assessment prepared by CTL Environmental Services in March 2001, aerial photographs of the site dating from 1949 to 1968, the site was primarily used as an orchard and contained one residence The 1977 aerial photograph shows the site still occupied by the house but the orchard is no longer present Based on a recent site visit, it appears the site had been disked regularly since the removal of the groves Due to the disturbed nature of the site and surrounding development, the site does not contain adequate habitat for any endangered speces Additionally, as identified on Exhibit IV-3 of the City's General Plan, the site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources. Several mature trees are present onsite There are several large eucalyptus trees near the westerly border that will need to be removed in order to accommodate site development Many of the tree species are in declining health and appear to have survived on rainfall as the other vegetation onsite appears non-imgated and dry. The applicant is required to submit an application for a Tree Removal Permit and pay necessary fees Trees scheduled for removal will be replaced with trees of appropriate size and quantity per the City's Development Code The impact is not considered significant b) The Initial Study identified short-term impacts to air quality and noise with development of the project site However, the short-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction actiwties and will not exceed established thresholds The impacts will cease once construction actiwties are completed. Implementation of mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study will ensure that short-term impacts will remain less than significant levels c) The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Ovemdng Consideration for sigmficent adverse environmental effects of bwldout in the City and sphere of influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in sigrnficant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted statements of ovemding consideration balanang the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and statements of ovemding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is requred d) Development of 17 single-family homes would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly ~~ MflR 20 2002 4:53PM HUGHES HOMES IMC 626-852-7620 p.2 Inibal Study for Cky Of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001.00588 Page 22 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tlenng, program EIR or other CEQA process, one or more eNeets have been adequatey analyzed in en earlier EIR or Plegatlve DeGardtlon per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within lh0 scope of and adequalety analyzed In the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were eddrossed by mibgetfon measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utllrzed m completing this Inibal Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Divisron offices. 10500 Civic Canter Drive (check all that apply): (i) Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR • City of Rancho Cucamonga (CertifledOdober 17, 2001) (~) General Plan -City of Rancho Cucamonga (CerUfled October 17, 2001) (~) CTL Environmental Services, Phase I Slte Assessment, March 2001 (~) Leighton, George E., Awustical Analysis Report for Treot No, 14162, August 6, 1990, revised March 8, 2002 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I oertky that I am the applicant for the project described In this Inibal Study. I acknowledge that f have read this Initial Study and the proposed mibgaUon measures Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mkigatan measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where dearly no signklcaM environmental effects would okxur. ,/ --'b" ~~ ~ -.~ ~' 'GA'L ~~__,.~,,.a ~/JT~n~ ,~ ._ _ Date: /' /~/119~/~ 17' . /~ ~i~~iYsi~in ~ ~~ 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with ffie Calilom)a Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review DRC2001-00588 Public Review Period Closes: Apnl 10, 2002 Project Name: Project Applicant: Wagon Development, LLC Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 838719th Street - APN 202-021-37 Related file Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14182 Project Description: The review of detailed site plan and bwlding elevationsfor 17 angle family homes on 51 acres of land in the Low Residential Dsfict (2-4 dwellings per acre) FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a sign~cant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Iniltal Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the proled may have a signficant effect on the environment ® The In~6al Study identified potentially sgnficant effects but (1) Rev~ons in the proled plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before flits proposed Negatnre Declaration was released for public reviewwould avod the effects or mfigate the effects to a point where clearly no s~gndicant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evdence before the agency that the proled as revised may have a s~gnficant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The projectfile and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Cerrter Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. • Apn110.2002 Date of Determination Adopted sy 65a RESOLUTION NO 02-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO DRC2001-00586, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14162, LOCATED AT 8387 19TH STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 202-021-37 A ReGtals 1 Walton Development, LLC filed an application for the Design Review of Tract 14162, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 10th day of April 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speGfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the ReGtals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on April 10, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to approximately 5 1 acres of land, located at 8387 with a street frontage of 465 feet and lot depth of approxmately 620 feet and is presently unimproved, and b The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is developed, the properties to the south and east are designated Low Residential, and the property to the west is single-family residential and a Cucamonga County Water District reservov site, and c The project consists of the Site Plan and Design Review of 17 single-family homes within the previously approved Tentative Tract 14162, and d The proposed project is located v~nthin the Low Residential (2-4 dwellings peracre) and has been designed in accordance with the standards and gwdelines of the Development Code 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on April 10, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed protect is consistent v~nth the obtectives of the General Plan, and b That the proposed design is in accord with the ob~ectrves of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and 653 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-40 DRC2001-00588 - WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC Apnl 10, 2002 Page 2 c That the proposed design rs in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together Huth the conditions applicable thereto, moll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the viunity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherHnth all wntten and oral reports mGuded for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance Hnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEGL4 guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Plamm~g Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration Huth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Calrfomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect Hnll have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Decaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condilion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannino Division 1) Construct a decorative penmeter blockwall, including where adtoining "not-a-part" parcels 2) Landscaping Hell include turf (sod) on the easterly property boundary, which will abut the neighbonng property line with an existing residence located on the southeast comer of 19th Street and Via Serena 3) The courtyard area at the entry of the homes will consist of three decorative pilasters with a low, decorative connecting wall, and shall be constructed of bnck matenal and stucco molding, per the Design Review Committee conditions of approval ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-40 DRC2001-00588 - WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC Apnl 10, 2002 Page 3 4) All elevations shall exhibit elements of the featured architectural style on all sides of the dwelling as approved by the Design Review Committee These features shall include such elements as shutters, chimney upgrades, and wood/stucco tram subject to City Planner rewew 5) Per Tree Removal Pertrnt DRC2001-00368, a total of 16 Eucalyptus trees to be removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with 15-gallon trees on-site Ena ineenno Division 1) DRC2001-00588 shall continue processing the improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer as regwred by the conditions of approval for Tract 14162 2) DRC2001-00588 shall continue processing the grading plan If revised, the plan shall be submitted for Grading and Plan Rewew again 3) All missing public improvements, inGuding sidewalks, parkway trees, streetlights, dnve approaches and monument sign wrath landscaping shall be installed per the onginal conditions of approval forTract 14162 l to a d t 4) y ions pp i The same development comments and remairnng con this project as are noted on the Planrnng Commission Resolution 92-112 for Tentative Tract 14162 5) Dnve approaches shall conform to Standard Drawnng 101, Type R-1 The mawmum wndth for 1 or 2 car garages is 16 feet Three-car garages shall neck down as well 6) The remaining conditions apply to this protect as regwred by Planning Commission Resolution 92-112, which approved the onginal subdivision of Tract 14162 a) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electncal) on the protect side of 19th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site east of the east protect boundary to the first pole off-site west of the adtacent Parcel (APN 202-021-36) boundary pnor to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City's adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as ~t occurs on the opposite side of the street and along the adtacent parcel to the west b) Construct the City's entry monument to the satisfaction of the CRy Engineer c) The developer shall remove the existing street improvements within the area of Hamilton Street, which was vacated pnor to the map's recordation Q~(~ V /~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-40 DRC2001-00588 - WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC Apnl 10, 2002 Page 4 d) Construct curb, gutter, pavement, and streetlights on 19th Street from the western protect boundary across the frontage of the adtacent parcel (APN 202-021-36) to the west The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of construction of the off-site street improvements from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs The 19th Street improvement plans are currently in the plan check process and not yet approved Based on those current plans, additional street nght-of-way may be regwred across the adjacent parcel to the west The developer shall make a good faith effort to acgwre the n:gwred off-site property interests necessary to construct the regwred public improvements pnor to final plan approval, public improvement acceptance, or occupancy, whichever occurs first e) Provide landsceping for the east parkway of Via Serena south of 19th Street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Environmental Mdiaation Water 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the applia3nt shall identify BMPs . to be implemented dunng the penod the site is under construction BMPs shall be identified on the Grading Plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated vwth water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance vnth SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Streets adtacent to the site shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated vwth vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon Ume of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equpment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energy efflaency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans inGude a statement that all construction equipment well be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's speafications 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or Gean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible V~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-40 DRC2001-00588 - WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC Apnl 10, 2002 Page 5 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use Hazardous Matena/s 1) The facility shall be thoroughly surveyed by a California Occupational Health and Safety Act (Cal/OSHA) certified asbestos inspector for the presence of asbestos pnor to any demolition activities The survey shall include inspection, identification, and quantification of all asbestos-containing matenal 2) If the fatality is found to contain asbestos, the asbestos-containing matenal shall be removed pnor to demolition in accordance with procedures outlined in AOMD Rule 1403 (1)(D) and handled in accordance with Rule 1403 (1)(E) The SCAOMD shall be notified at least ten working days pnor to demolition Norse 1) Dunng all project site excavation and grading on-site, the prolect contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards 2) The prolect contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the prolect site 3) Dunng prolect construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in noise levels at adjacent properties to exceed the noise standards spetafied in the Development Code, to between the hours of 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m , Monday through Saturday No construction is permitted on Sundays and Government Code holidays 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman 65~- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-40 DRC2001-00588 - WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC Apnl 10, 2002 Page 6 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of Apnl 2002, by the follo~nng vote-to-wit AYES NOES• COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS I~ ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2001-00588 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mil5gatton measures identified in the (Mitigated Negative Declaration) for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Cmc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 6~ MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DRC2001-00588 April 10, 2002 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the prolect planner. 4. The prolect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unanticipated circumstances may apse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The prolect planner is responsible for approving anysuch refinements oradditions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mtigation) that require monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. In those instances regwnng long-term prolect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City wdh a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. \/ uN MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC 2001-00588 Applicant: _ Walton Develoament LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Emllv Wlmer Date: March 19. 2002 -. .. Water - ~ _ ~, .~,sr,yti, ~~~ ~.- ;- aj= ~'rl` z, ~~ ,v+~~. - r~; ;a~...-ar~ - ;, rr-t, -a,''- ~ , . ) µa~ -.Y~.~ .A" - .~-^tu4~F~ ,fE+~.~" ys'`5,5'.C'yr f' ~7ri Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall identify BMPs CP/CE B Review of Plans C 2 to be implemented dudng the penod the site is under consWction BMPs shall be identified on the grading plans for review and approval by the City Engineer Air Quality ~ - - , , ... -- ~~ _ r~,~, - ~, - ''~ ' ' v _ ~. , . , The site shall be treated mth water or other soil-stabilizing agent CP C Review of Plans C 2 (approved by SCADMD and RW DCB) daily to reduce PM,a emissions, m accordance mth SCADMD Rule 403 Streets adjacent to the site shall be swept accerding to a schedule CP C Review of Plans C 2 established by the Qty to reduce PM,o emissions asseaated with vehiGe tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon lime ' of year of censtruchon Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such CP C Review of Plans C 2 episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 CP C Review of Plans C 2 hours or more to reduce PM,o emtssians The construction contractor shall select the censWCtion equipment CP B Review of Plans C 2 used on-site based on low emission factors and high~nergy effiaenuy The consWction contractor shall ensure the consWction grading plans inctude a statement that all construction egwpment well be tuned and maintained in accordance mth the manufacturer's speaficetions The construction contractor shall uhtize electric or Gean altemabve fuel CP C Review of Plans C 2 powered equipment where feasible The censtruction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading CP B Review of Plans C 2 plans include a statement that work crews mil shut offequlpment when not m use -. .. Hazards. _, ~ .x•~«~~ s~,~,*` ~ '~,~a«~?s~+~;.:c:~'~=~ z~«~„~~,p,l,;;~,z '~gw~F^" ~'+ f ~ `;;'~""sa;~.r ~'d~1-~,.~-a' ". v~ , i aG~3 ti _ cty • R. 'i L. {, fy ~ jr.C1 ~'>2.-ir ~ . y °.:° h..l ~~r+"~ ~';<; .a The structure shall be thoroughly surveyed by a Cahfomia CP g Rewew of Plans A/p 2 Occupational Health and Safety Act (Cal/OSHA) certified asbestos Inspector for the presence of asbestos poor to any demolition acWNes The survey shall mdude inspection, identificetion, and quanhficetion of all asbestos-containing malenal If the faalily is found to contain asbestos, the asbestos-containing malenal shall be removed poor to demolition in acwrdance with CP g Review of Plans g Z procedures outlined in AOMD Rule 1403 (1)(D) and handled in accordance with Rule 1403 (1)(E) The SCAOMD shall be notified al Least ten working days poor to demolition ~ ~ .a;` ` >~ NOis@ ~ ^:«t1 .":- t. `t,-,~~5,,,c 3F ~nf aw'ir~+w.L ..,. ...-.-- ;.~T 3'.S. j Dunng all project site excevation and grading, the protect cenVactor CP C Review of Plans A 4 shall egwp all construction egwpment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards The project contractor shall place all stationaryconsWction equipment Cp C so that emitted noise is duetted away from sensitive receptors nearest Review of Plans A 4 the project sde Dunng project consWction, the censWction contractor shall limit ali CP C A 4 censWction related ac8wties that would result in noise levels at Review of Plans adjacent propertes to exceed the noise standards speGfied in the Development Code, to between the hours of 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m Monday through Saturday No construc8on is permitted on Sundays and Government Code holidays n~ 7- Key to Checklist Abbreviations ReSponSlble Person - - Monltorlnp Frequency '~ ° ,- .`. „- ' ~ ; Method of VerlflcaUOnA -"' - ~ - Sanctions _- CDD -Community Development Dnector A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 - Wdhhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWCtion B -Other Agency Permd I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Budding Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Bwldmg Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO • Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC - Fve Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 11PLANNINGIEMILYW HOMESUAMCHKLST-DRC2001-00588 DOC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2001-00588 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR 16SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS APPLICANT: WALTON DEVELOPMENT, LLC LOCATION: SOUTHSIDE OF 19TH STREET, WEST CITY LIMITS ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternatwe, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, budding and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if budding permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations Comolehon Date ~~- ~~- ~~. ~~- SC-02-02 1 ~~~ Protect No DRC2001-00588 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all _/~_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code _/~_ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Budding and Safety Division to show compliance The bwldings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _1~- submittedfor City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ._(~_ consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, budding, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development _/~_ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units ~___/_ with all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall ~~_ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/~_ adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map 10 All bwlding numbers and indmdual units shall be identdied in a clear and concise manner, ~~_ including proper illumination 11 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of ~~_ all lots for City Planner and Ctty Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction actmty, dust control measures, and security fencing 12 Six-foot decorative block walls shalt be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double ~~_ wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good fadh effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protest's perimeter 13 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each ~~_ support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two Yz-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 14 Wood Penang shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant -J~- 15 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk ~~_ 16 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/~~ (stucco to match the building color) SC-02-02 2 Y `*'~ Protect No DRC2001-00588 Comoletion Data 17 Where rock cobble is used, 1t shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be _/_/_ manufactured products D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including av conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or ~_/_ projections, shall be shielded from vlew and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwldmg design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwldmg plans E. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and lrngatlon plan, including slope planting and model home ~~_ landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval poor to the issuance of bwldmg permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 All pnvate slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than ~~_ 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, vrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 All pnvate slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or ~_/_ greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften then appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2.1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft. of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent vngation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be ~~_ continuously maintained 1n a healthy and thriving condition by the developer unt11 each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those unRs, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be _J~ included in the regwred landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Drolsion 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on ~_/_ the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 7 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, ~~_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division F. Environmental 1 The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway ~~_ protect in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 2 A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to ~~_ scheduling Planning Commission The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise SG02-02 3 \J~/ Protect No DRC2001-00588 Completion Date attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the bulding materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report 3 Mitigation measures are regwred for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 00 prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the Ctly to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit G. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and ~_/_ location of mailboxes Multi-faintly residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following ~-/ a Site/Plot Plan, ~ b. Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Project Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils ~_/_ report Archtlect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls ~~- 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation ~_/_ coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 5 Developers wishing to participate in Energy Efficiency, contact the Building and Safety ~~ Droiswn for information SC-02-02 4 ~~I Protect No DRC2001-00588 Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Bulding Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Offiaal, after tracUparcel map recordation and prior to issuance of bwldmg permits 5 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8.00 p.m. and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. J. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property Ime clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for required occupancy separation(s) 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions K. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Bulding Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the Ume of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved pnor to issuance of budding permits . 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for ail new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer Completion Date -~-~- ~-~. ~~. ~~. ~-~. _/._/_ ~-~_ -~~- ~-~_ _/-~. -~~. -~-~- ~-~- SC-02-02 5 iJW~ Project No DRC2001-00588 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Street Improvements All public Improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to Clty Standards Interior street Improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Curb 8 AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Ligbts Trees Trail Island Trail 19th Street X X X X X e Hamilton Street X X X X X Notes (a) Median island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Monument entry sign and landscaping 3. Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Clvll Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street Improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertonned in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Clty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speafied by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Completion Date • ~~- ~~- ~-~- ~~- _/.__J- ~~- ~~- SC-02-02 6 Protect No DRC2001-00588 Completion Date f Existing City roads regwring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ~_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be ~~_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner pnor to submittal for first plan ~~_ check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in ~~_ accordance with the City's street tree program 5 A permit shalt be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following ~_/_ right-of-way 19th Street M. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards ~~_ shall be submitted to the Ctty Engineer for review and approval pnor to final map approval or issuance of building permts, whichever occurs fvst The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District 19th Street 2 Publtc landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared ~~_ cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surtaces 3 All regwred public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the ~~_ developer until accepted by the City. 4 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _/_/_ Beautification Master Plan 19th Street N. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, ~~_ gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shaii be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _J-1- APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors ~~_ 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are ~~_ within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices ~~_ SG02-02 7 ~~ Protect NO DRC2001-00588 Comoleaon Date P. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be _/_/ lifted from frame or track to any manner APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SG02-02 8 ~~ . '.Nw' ~- FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~ ~ ~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0538 PROJECT #: DRC2001-00588, Tract 14162 PROJECT NAME: Promus Investment DATE: Aprll 3, 2002 PLAN TYPE: SFR 17 Homes APPLICANT NAME: Promus Investment Network Inc. OCCUPANCY TYP E: Group R, Division 3 FLOOR AREA (S): Less than 3600 s f LOCATION: 8387 19th Street FD REVIEW BY Steve Locate, Fire Protection Plamm~g Specialist PLANNER: Emily Wimer ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following conditions of approval represent the minimum standard for approval of the protect as submitted. These conditions are based on the plans submitted and may not include all Fve District regwrements for the proposed protect. Changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire Distract regwrements. Please make the necessary changes or corrections pnor to resubmitting for review Pnor to approval by the Plamm~g Division compliance with all conditions and/or corrections must be completed All Fire Distract conditions and comments must be addressed for construction permits can be issued Contact the Fve Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Pnor to issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the revew and approval by the Fire District and the Water District 2 Fve flow requirements for this protect shall be 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended The requred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fue Code Appendix III-B, as amended • 3 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable pnor to delivering any combustible bwlding materials on-site (i e , lumber, roofing materials, etc) Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Diwsion ~~ 4 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the burfder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The bwlder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division 5 Existing fve hydrants and mains within 600 feet of the protect shall be shown on the water plan submitt+~ for review and approval Include main size 6 Pnor to the issuance of any bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground 7 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner B. Water Availabrfity 1 Pnor to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Avadabddv for Fire Protectron Form shall be signed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District If suffiaent water to meet fve flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow C. Automatic Fve Sprinkler Systems 1. All structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (Section E Fire Access), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system 2 Required Note• Prior to the recordation of ANY map, a note shall be placed on the map stating that all commercial structures great than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, all multi-family residential structures, and all structures which do not meet Fire District access requirements (Section D Fire Access), shall be protected by an automatic fve sprinkler syst~ meeting the approval of the Fve Distract. 3 Prior to the issuance of a bwlding permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any automatic fire sprinkler system Fve Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a Fire Construction Services permd 4 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 5. The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fue sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupanaes, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies. D. Fire Access 1 Fire District access roadways shall include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes 2 Residential Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map, the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways and fire lanes All roadways or fve lanes shall comply with RCFPD Ordinance FD32 and other applicable standards 3 Residential & Commercial Pnor to issuance of any grading pennds, the applicant shall submd and obtain approval of plans for all roads, streets and courts, public or private, from the Fve District in consultation wdh the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fve apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when otherwise requred Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibd obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc ), control gates, bollards, or other modrfications in fire lanes or access roadways without prio wrsten approval of the Fve District, Fire Safety Division 4 Street Signs A note shall be placed on the srfe plan indicating that ail street/road signs shall be designed an maintained as either internally or externally illuminated in a manner meeting the approval of the Fire District 5 The minimum unobstructed width for a Fve Distract access roadway or fire lane is 26 feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet era 6 The minimum inside turn radius is 20 feet. The minimum outside turn radius is 50 feet. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 50 feet. 7 All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the fvst story shall be located within 150 feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bulding Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior bulding openings 8 A note shall be placed on all plans which clearly indicates the following Emergency access, a minimum 26 feet in wldth and 14 feet, 6 inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fue District Standards 9. Amend site access to accommodate Fve District emergency vehicle access 10 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for fire lanes on required Fire Distract access roadway less than 40 feet in width The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire Distract standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fve Lanes° standard 11. Prior to the issuance of any Certrficate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes The method of enforoement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identrfy who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes 12 New residential buildings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street When budding setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry E. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fve District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire Distract Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site The roadway shall be maintained at all times F. Fire District Fees Due 1 Fire Distract fee(s), plus a $1.00 microfilm fee per "plan page" will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract as follows $132 for Water Plan Review for Public Fve Protection $132 for Single-family Residential Tract (per phase) 'Note Separate plan check fees for tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fue sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon separate submittals of plans G. Plan Submittal Requred Notice Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Bwlding, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards NOTE Separate plan check fees for tenant improvements, fve protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of plans Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 7/24/01 Revision ~~~ • T H E C I T Y O f RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE April 10, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Douglas Fenn, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION - A request for an extension of a previously approved residential subdivision of 27 single-family homes on 3 35 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Camelian Street at Vivero Street - APN 207-022-54 and 64 Related Flle: Variance 96-02. Staff has prepared a determination that the protect is within the scope of prior environmental documents. BACKGROUND Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15783 was approved by the Planning Commission on March 25, 1998, fora 2-year period The Commission concurrently approved Variance 96-02 along with the tentative tract. This is the third request for an extension. The protect is currently going through the plan check process. ANALYSIS A Subdivision Map On January 6, 1999, the City Council amended the City's Subdivision Ordinance to establish a 3-year initial approval period for tracts (increased from 2 years previously) Also, the amendment allows the Planning Commission authority to grant time extensions in 12-month increments for up to 5 years (a maximum of 8 years from the original time approval), which is the maximum allowed under the State Subdivision Map Act, Section 66452 69(e) The maximum Irfe of this protect would be up to 8 years from the date of approval (final expiration on March 25, 2006) B Related Items Desion Review and Variance The original approval for the protect also included review for construction of 27 single-family residential units and a variance for the following reduce the minimum area requirement for the use of Optional Development Standards, reduce the rear yard setback along the north and west protect boundary, reduce the building-to-curb setback, reduce the building-to-building separation, reduce the average and minimum landscape setback along Carnelian Street, reduce the parking streetscape setback, and increase the wall height along the north and west protect boundary ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION April 10, 2002 Page 2 The time extension for design reviews and variance is regulated by the City's Development Code. The Development Code was amended by Ordinance No. 596 to grant a 5-year approval penod with no possible time extensions The maximum approval penod would be 5 years from the original approval The final expiration of the design review and variance would be March 25, 2003 On May 10, 2000, the Planning Commission granted time extensions for both the variance and design review to March 25, 2003. No further time extension is possible. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT In granting the previous time extension on May 10, 2000, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Conditions in the area have not changed appreciably and no further environmental review is required. Staff recommends adherence to the mitigation measures for geologic, water, transportation/circulation, biological resources, and noise, which were included in the original approval (see attached Mitigation Monitoring Program). CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a 1-year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15783 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, Brad utter City Planner BB:DF/~c Attachments Exhibit "A" Exhibit °B" Exhibit "C° Exhibit "D" Exhibit °E" Exhibit °F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Resolution - Letter from Applicant dated March 4, 2002 - Location Map -Illustrative Site Plan - Detailed Site Plan - Elevations/Floor Plans -Street Scene -Design Review Comments - Initial Study -Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15783 of Approval for Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15783 C~ G & D CONSTRUCTION, INC. Architecture ~ Development ~ Construction March 4, 2002 Doug Fenn Planning Division The City Of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE. Tentative Tract 15783, Time Extensions Deaz Mr. Fenn, This letter shall request a tune extension, for the subdivision on Carnelian St., Rancho Cucamonga, Tentative Tract 15783 Please extend all planning department, engineering, standazd conditions and all other necessary documents for a mmunum penod of 1 yeaz from Mazch 25, 2002. Plans aze in there final stages of completion by our engineer as per the corrections requested by vanous depaztments. Attached please find the tract map extension application, radius map and labels. Please call me with any questions. My direct line is (626147-3118. Tha~n~k,.Y/o~u , Gam' '"' ""'„" ~FJ Todd Leibl, C.F.O. For: G&D Construction, Inc. 6\WSDATA\CARNE[JA.MTmFfq En3003 vpd G``~~ 25 NORTH SANTA ANITA AVENUE, SUITE A ~ ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91006 llll Tel (626) 447-3104 ~ Fax (626) 447-3162 ~ License No 432793 Todd Leibl (626) 447-3118 ~ Lars Dennert (626) 447-3121 Darnel Lerbl (626) 447-99931 Earl Richey (626) 574-9445 ~J1~%T ~tl~--tl C3 • l.J •.J a r, lJ ~~ n r~ 1 ~ I 1 r r-1 l~J r+ lJ Y l 1, L J J + r+ ( J a f+ ~ .J r+ l \ ~ ~ lJ ', ~ n r+ ~ lJ lJ ri r+ r+ r 3 ,\ aJ ~ ~~~~ r, ~ \\ ;~~ aJ r~ \ \\\ r J u \\ ~ N `\ CJ ii ~~ \ 1~) ~) ~\ ~ rtrtt • 1• ~, ~ ~+ ` ` e1¢II J - c+ ' . ;, \ L J ~ar: l(,: D~ ~ ~I~ -J ~ ~ ,'~ [J \•, ~ . K \\`\` ,\ • Y~ ~ ~.\ \~ ~~ .. CITY lJ lJ lJ 1 J t' :: ~ :: r~ t; t•1 V I+ + r+ J lJ J .. LJ ij lJ a lJ u u iJ) +~ ~ : ~ •J l~ li ~~ w iJ aJ ~J r ri ~~~~ rr•,J •_ lJ i` i r+ r) ) r• J lJ ~J lJ lJ '~ ~ r. C: •~i ~: ;, _, I J ~'~~ l ., z/ r~ :% r '•~ l: r+ S lJ ~ Project: S~ 1518' Titla• ~AGA~1C C~ Exhibit "B" ~ ate: ¢ ~ u +e +r u +e \ ..r...~. ~... w ~ ao +a +a .. a+ to S \ ~ ++ ~ ~ as a• +o '~ ~ as as a \ e~ \ s •\ t \ a \~ \ 0 : i \~ \~ a a a TRACT /bG2 /5783 CITY OF R AMONGA p~,A I I ON Project: ~5~~ Title: ~ ~Ik r~ Exhibit "C" ~ Date: 3 ~~ CS i i CITY Project: 15~~~ Title: !p" ~~ ~ '~ ~ Date: ~ ~ ~ Exhibit "D" • 1 ~_~ CITY OFR OAMONGA PLA I IS~ON ~ ~- Project: ~ `~~ ~ Title: ~ ~ Exhil Exhibit "E-1° Date: caw ~ ~.vvr~ Herr lj~M(_ u:r 'mo't j ~... __ ' n ~ RIGHT 1A,1B ~.._ REAR 1B w/oFirsplee• ....... v.•..•..• ?~.CT,1 CITY Project: ~51~~ ~ Title: Y~IJ ~% .Exhibit "E-2" Date: '~ 25 °l~b REAR 1Aw/FlreDlees LFFT tA,1B CITY OF R ~ ~AMONGA C PLA I 1 ON Project: 157~'~ Title: , Exhibit "E-3" ~~ Date: '~ ~ ~J a~ se ~r se L c~ HEAR 4A LEFT 2A CITY Project: ~~ ~~ , Title: ~~L- ~ y ~ ti C\~ Exhibit "E-4"~ ~~ Date: 25 ~~ r-t ---' '-) I i ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ) I i ~ I I 11 I r--' I I I _~ -------` 2ND FLOOR ~~ 4 i%~~1 I o 4 I 4w r-~ ~a i M~ew~ 1 I It===-_ I I 2ND FLOOR .------- 1ST FLC 4axafa~..-~ PLAN 3 ~1°aoef nw'f~Lar.l TOTAL 1664af I ~:. CITY OF Rd ' +~, CAMONGA PLANNING~bJ,YIS'10N Project: (5 ~~ (J\~ Title: ~ Exhibit "E-5"" Date: 25 • a REAR 3B w/oFirsplaes CITY Project: 5 Title: ~' NGA (J\o~ i Exhibit "E-6" ~~! Date: '~ ~ REAR 9A w/FlreDlace LEFT 3Aa98 ~' cinr q W Q H S W _F 2 7 i 2 J 6 W f tll O W d a S W ~• 1 OF RAN CAMONGA PLANNI~~ ON C.~3 2 O H V W a f W W 6 f N J u 6 F Project: T~- 157Y7'j7 Title: ~~ Exhibit '°F~" . Date: ~ `~`~ i ~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:00 p.m. Tom Grahn November 19, 199b tV V V CONSTRUCTION - A residential subdivision of 29 single family homes on 3.3~ acres of land to e Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling utriu per acres), located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-54 and 64. De~+Qrt parameters: To the north of the project site aze single family homes and a CCWD water tank, to the east are single family homes, and to the west and south is the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The project site is roughly triangulaz in shape fronting onto the west side of Carnelian Street. There are a number of trees located throughout the project site and a row of Eucalyptus trees adjacent to Carnelian Street, the vast majority of which aze proposed for removal with development of the project. There are no known cultural resources located on the project site. llrcion ('onstraints: The small site area and triangulaz shape present unique destgn challenges Also, addttional dedication is need to realign Carnelian Street to address traffic safety concerns. As a result there aze multiple variances needed. Related Pro~ec In October 1989, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No 14363 which proposed the development of thirty-two condominium uniu on the project site. In January 1993, the Planning Commtsston approved a design review modification to the protect site to revise the site plan and building elevattons for thirty-two town homes. Both previous approvals utilized duplexes for the project design. Staff ('omments: The following commenu are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 2. Development Standards -The project is required to utilize the Optional Development Standazds to develop single family detached homes rn the Medium Distnct; however, the Development Code identifies a minimum project azea of 5 acres for use of these standards. Therefore, the applicant has submitted a Variance to address this inadequacy. The Development Code states that "(the optional developmenlJ standards are intended to provrde high standards for the development of projects of superior quality and compatibility. ' The Committee should consider whether the protect features a superior architectural destgn, site planning, and ru relationship of private and common open space azeas, and in iu relationship to adjacent uses. Architectural Style -The project proposes the development of twenty-nine uniu utilizing one floor plan with five elevations. These elevations utilize a vanety of materials, window treatmenu, garage door treatments, etc. The Committee should consider whether the massing and proportion aze too repetitive and do not provrde enough variety when viewed from the adjacent street frontage. To breakup the repetitive nature of the protect azchitectural style an additional floor plan could be provided that utilizes distinctly different massing, proportion, and scale. RC AGENDA 15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION November 19, 1996 Page 2 3. Recreational Amenrtres -The project complies with the required amenities for projects of 30 units or less. ~condarv Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: i Provide decorative paving at the project entry behind the publictight-of--way. 2. Provide terming within the landscaped area adjacent to Carnelian Street. The terming should be undulatrng, approximately 3 feet in height, and non-uniform in appearance. Bermtng must be desrgned taking rnto consideration the requirements of the drainage improvements to Camelian trees. Since no fence is proposed, a cazeful combination of landscaping and terming should be used to a) define the private on-site space to discourage unwanted entries, b) soften the appearance of nine gazages from Carnelian Street, and c) discourage children from ruruung out onto Carnelian Street. 3. The project should be desrgned wrth a trail connection to the future regional trail located along the Cucamonga Creek Channel. A lockable gate should be provided. It is not cleaz whether a trail connectron is proposed between Units 9 and 10. Revise the internal driveway to delete the extra paving beyond the 50-foot radius in the extreme northeast and northwest comers of the project site. The affected drveways, sidewalks, etc., should be extended accordingly. Delete the connections from Lot 1 and 8 to the poollspa area. The location and size of these areas could become a secunty and maintenance problem. Adequate on-srte lighting shall be provided to ensure a safe environment while at the same time not causing azeas of intense light or glaze. The only lights identified are wall-mounted fixtures adjacent to urut garage doors. Lighting needs to be expanded to identify lighting driveways and recreation areas. Fixtures and poles shall be desrgned and placed in a manner consistent and compatible with the overall site and budding character. Provide decorative metal fence, with gated access, to secure the open space and tot lot area north of Untt 27. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be redesigned and returned for review by the Design Review Committee. Aesi~n Review ommittee Comments: embers Present: Rich Macias, Larry McNrel, Nancy Fong Staff Planner: Tom Gratin CAS DRC AGENDA TT 15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION A'ovember 19, 1996 Pace 3 The Committee recommended that the applicant work with staff to revise the project to address the following design issues and return to the Design Review Committee for revtew. ]. The project Site Plan and architecture should be revised to reflect a project of superior qualiq• and design conststent with the Optional Development Standards. The Site Plan appears too tight and should be reduced in density to open up space around uniu and provide for more useable common open space. 3. Provide an additional floor plan with different massing, proportion, and scale. This will reduce the monotony of the streetscape when viewing the project from Carnelian Street. Revise the design of the common open space azeas to provide areas suitable for recreation. i C\l~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.10 p.m. Tom Grahn May 6, 1997 ~ONSTR CIi TION - A residential subdtvision of 27 single farmly homes on 3.35 acres of lantl to the Medium Residential Distnct (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-54 and 64. ~ackQround: This project was reviewed at the November 19, 1996, Design Review Committee meeting (see attached minutes). At that meeting the Committee recommended the following design modifications: 1. The Site Plan and architecture should be revised to reflect a project of superior quality and design consistent with the Optional Development Standazds. 2. The Site Plan appeazs too tight and should be reduced m density to open up space around units and provide for more useable common open space. 3. Provide an additional floor plan with different massing, proportion, and scale. This will reduce the monotony of the streetscape when viewing the project from Carnelian Street. 4. Revise the design of the common open space aeeas to provide areas suitable for recreation. ~e~n Parameters: The project site is roughly tnangulaz in shape fronting onto the west side of Camel~an Street To the north of the project site aze single family homes and a Cucamonga County Water District water tank, to the east are single family homes, and to the west and south is the Cucamonga Creek Channel. There aze a number of trees located throughout the project site and a row of Eucalyptus trees adjacent to Carnelian Street, the vast majority of which are proposed for removal with development of the project. There are no known cultural resources. ,staff Comments: The following comments aze intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: jvlaior Issues. The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding thts project: Development Standards -The project proposes the development of single family homes in the Medium Residential Distnct and because of the product type (i.e., single family homes) is required to utilize the Optional Development Standads. Optional Development Standards are "intended to provide high standards for the development of projects of superior quality and compatibility. " The Commtttee must determine if the project Site Plan and azchttecture reflect a design of supenor quality and compatibility. 2. Project Denstry -The Site Plan was revised to reduce the number of proposed units from 29 to 27. Based upon the net project acreage of 3.35 acres of land, there are 8.05 units proposed per acre. This reduction in density opened up the project and increased the azea of pnvate open space around each unit. 3. Architecture -The original project design included one floor plan with two elevations that provided five elevation alternatives through variation in the placement of garage doors, front entry doors, second story windows, and roof massing The project architecture was revised to provide one additional elevation with two alternattves that provide different roof massing and window placement. C\~ DRC COMMENTS TT 15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION May 6,1997 Page 2 4. Recreational Amenities -The previous Design Review submittal complied with the required number of recreational amenities for projects vnth 30 units or less by providing a swimming pool, bazbeque facility, and lazge open lawn area at one area of the project site. The Committee should determine if the recreational amenities provided meet the intent of the code requirements. ~PCOndarv Issues Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: Provide beiming within the landscaped azea adjacent to Carnelian Street. The berming should be undulating, approximately 3 feet in height, and non-uniform in appearance. Benning must be designed to take into consideration the requirements of the drainage improvements to the trees adjacent to Carnelian Street. Since no fencing is proposed, a careful combination of landscaping and berming should be used adjacent to Carnelian Street to: a) define pnvate on-site space to discourage unwanted entries; b) soften the appearance of nine front-on garages, and c) discourage children from running into the street. 2. Revise the internal dnveway to delete the extra paving beyond the 50-foot radius in the extreme northwest corner of the project site. The affected dnveways, sidewalks, etc., should be extended accordingly. 3. Adequate on-site lighting shall be provided to ensure a safe environment while at the same time not causing areas of intense light or glare No lighting is currently shown; however, the previous submittal only identified wall mounted fixtures adjacent to garage doors. Project lighting needs to identify lighted dnveways and recreation areas. Fixtures and poles should be designed and placed in a manner consistent and compatible with the overall site and building character. Policv I~~ues: The following items aze a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The project has proposed a trail connection to the future regional trail located along the Cucamonga Creek Channel. This access is located between Lots 9 and 10. A lockable gate should be provided. The final design of the trail connection is subject to the recommendation by the Trails Committee. ,Staff Recommendation: Staffrecommends that the Committee forwazd the project to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Attachment: DRC Action Comments Dated November 19, 1997 Qe~n Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Tom Grahn The Committee recommended that the applicant work with staff to revise the project by addressing the following design issues and return to the Design Review Committee for review. C~~ '~ DRC COMMENTS TT 15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION May 6, 1997 Page 3 The Committee supported the revised Site Plan design and the current grouping of on-site amenities. 2. The Comrmttee dtd not support the proposed architectural style nor the proposed colors. The following comments were presented and should be addressed in any revised submittal: a. The azchitectural style appears dated and the proposed colors appear cartoon like. The Committee is not opposed to a craftsman azch~tectural style, but did not support the proposed azchitecture. b. The street scheme is dominated by gazage doors, massive dark roofs, and a heavy wood feel to the front elevation. c. The massive dazk roof elements need to be lightened up with a different roof file color. d. The applicant should explore the use of alternative roof massing to provide additional variety. The Committee felt there was too much of a box design to the elevations and suggested a gable roof facing the street to soften the street scheme. e The use of roll-up gazage doors may be considered. If utilized, they should provide variation in the garage door pattern f The Committee expressed concern with the minimal back yazds provided for most units. g Provide more landscaping to soften the project design. Landscaping should meet City standards h Explore lighter accent colors. Revise the internal driveway to delete the extra paving beyond the 50-foot radius of the extreme northwest comer of the project site. The affected driveways, sidewalks, etc., should be extended accordingly 4. Adequate on-site lighting should be provided and designed in a manner to minimize vandalism 5. Relocate the proposed trail connection to Cucamonga Creek from between units nine and ten to the recreation area. ~~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 7.20 p.m. Tom Grahn May 20, 1997 ~nlrn nwrn.frnlTeT ACCFSCMFNT ANT) TFNTATf VF TRACT 15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION - A residential subdivision of 27 single family homes on 3.35 acres of land m the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Carnelian SVeet at Vrvero SVeet - APN:207-022-54 and 64. This project was reviewed at the May 6, 1997 Design Review meeting At that meeting the Committee recommended that the applicant work with staff to revise the project by addressing the following design issues and return to the Design Review Committee for review. 1. The Committee supported the revised Site Plan design and the current grouping of on-site amenities. 2. The Committee did not support the proposed architectural style nor the proposed colors. The following comments were presented and should be addressed in any revised submittal• a. The architectural style appears dated and the proposed colors appear cartoon like. The Committee is not opposed to a craftsman architectural style, but did not support the proposed architecture. b The street scheme is dominated by garage doors, massive dark roofs, and a heavy wood feel to the front elevation. c. The massive dark roof elements need to be lightened up with a different roof the color. d The applicant should explore the use of alternative roof massing to provide additional variety. The Committee felt there was too much of a box dcsign to the elevations and suggested a gable roof facing the street to soften the street scheme. e The use of roll-up garage doors may be considered. If utilized, they should provide variation in the garage door pattern. f. The Committee expressed concern with the minimal back yards provided for most units. ¢ Provide more landscaping to soften the project design. Landscaping should meet City standards. h. Explore lighter accent colors. 3 Revise the internal driveway to delete the extra paving beyond the 50-foot radius of the extreme northwest corner of the project site. The affected driveways, sidewalks, etc., should be extended accordingly. 4. Adequate on-site lighting should be provided and designed in a manner to minimize vandalism. 5 Relocate the proposed trail connection to Cucamonga Creek from between units nine and ten to the • recreation area Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee forward the project to the Planning Commission for their consideration. /v a~ • DRC COMMENTS TT 15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION May 20, 1997 Page 2 Attachment: DRC Commenu dated May 6, 1997, and DRC Action Commenu dated November 19, 1996. ge~t~~ Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Rich Macias, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Tom Grahn The Design Review Committee concluded that the project may proceed to the Planning Commission for their consideration, but did not recommend approval due to concerns over the proposed architectural design. The following commenu were identified: 1. The Committee did not support the proposed architectural style and therefore did not recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission Commissioner Macias favored the project's architectural style, as it utilized a design style other than Spanish or Meditertanean. Commissioner Bethel did not favor the project architecture for the reasons noted in the May 6, 1997, Design Review Committee Action 2 The Committee supported the revised Site Plan design and the current grouping of on-site amenities, the revised trail location, and the proposed lighting. 3. The Committee did not support the proposed 10-foot rear yard setbacks along the west property line and identified that they could support shifting the project to the east by 5 feet, further reducing the landscape setback along Carnelian Street, to provide an increase in the usable rear yard area. Lots 6 through 13 would be effected by site plan adjustment. 4 The Committee reviewed the revised color scheme and supported the proposed color modification. ~\ DESIGN REVIEW COi~LV1ENTS 8.30 p.m. Tom Grahn September 2, 1997 CONSTRUCTION - A residential subdivision of 29 single family homes on 3.35 acres of land in the Iviedtum Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Carnelian Street at V tvero Street - APN: 207-022-~~ and 64. Tlus project vas previously reviewed by the Design Review Commtttee on May 6, and May 20, 1997, and November 19, 1996. At the last meeting the Commtttee did not support the proposed azchitectural style or the proposed colors, however, it was determined that the applicant could proceed to the Planning Commission for consideration. The following comments were presented by the Committee on May 20, 1997. The azchitectural style appears dated and the proposed colors appear cartoon Itke. The committee w-as not opposed to a craftsman architectural style, but did not support the proposed architecture. The street scheme is dominated by garage doors, massive dark roofs, and a heavy wood feel to the front elevation 3 The massive dark roof elements need to be lightened up w•tth different roof the color. =1 The applicant should e~:plore the use of altema[ive roof massing to provide additional variety. The Committee felt there was too much of a box design to the elevattons and suggested a gable roof facing the street to soften the street scheme. 5 The use of roll-up garage doors ma}• be considered. If uttli2ed, they should provide variation in the garage door Patten 6 Explore lighter accent colors -^ The applicant did not want to proceed to the Planning Conunisston ~~ithout a favorable recommendation from the Design Review Committee, and therefore, submitted for additional review The following architectural modifications were provided to the front elevattons. These modifications should be the basis of Committee discussion to de[ermine whether or not the elevattons are acceptable or will require further modification. Variation to the roof pitch to decrease the box like design Variation in the roof Itne through addtuonal gable roofs Reduction m the heavy wood feel of the elevation. Providing a brick veneer as an accent material on all elevations. This material will wrap around the side elevation to a logical tenntnation point The modification of awkward, box Itke unfuncttonal dortrters Into a functional element. Revised color and roof the samples will be available for Commtttee consideration. Craff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Committee forward the project to the Planning Commission for their consideration. C~aa C COMMENTS 15783 - G&D CONSTRUCTION September 2, 1997 Page 2 Attachment. DRC Action Comments dated May 20 and May 6, 1997 and November 19, 1996. lesion Review Committee Action• Members Present: Bill Bethel, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Tom Grahn The Committee appreciated the effort the applicant ~~•ent through to revise the elevations and concluded that the applicant may proceed to the Planning Commission for their considers[ion subject to the following Delete the proposed elevation l B. ~a3 ~,.ar~, n„~ ,sael.n.Z,so ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Stud The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEt?A. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. 1 i INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsrbr7ity of the applicant !o ensure that the applrcation rs complete at the hme of submrdal, City stall wrU not be avarlable to perform work required to provide mrssrng mlormatron. Applirabon Number /ar the pro/ed to whrch this form pertarns: Z Name 8 Address of developer or pro/ed sponsor Contact Person 8 Address• 1 OC/ ~ e f.,(~ J Telephone Number. G C % / ~ ~ ~ /~ D Name 6 Address of person prepanng this form (il diBerent from above) Telephone Number. INITSTD7 WPD-4196 ~~~ Page 1 Name 6 Address of pro/ect owner(s) • L7 ~r L/ (_ G7S 7 /~ ii ~ T/Qli1 -~ t 1 L - In/ormation indicated by asterisk (') is not required of non-conshuction CUP's unless otherwise requested by stall. '1) Provide a lull scale (8-12 x f i) copy o/the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which uiGudes the pro/ed sae, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a se! o/color photographs which show representative views into the site Iran the north, south, east and west; views into and Irom the site Irom the primary access pants which serve the site; and representatrve views of s~gnihcant features /rom the sae Include a map showrnglocabon o/each photograph. 3) Pro/ect Locabon (descnbeJ ` ~ r~,~11 ~f ~ /'f ~ ~/r (/ e ~ G7 Ire G { 4) Assessors Paroe/ Numbers (attach add~honal sheet rlnetessary)' ~' 1_L'~- o Zz S yooov Gz y~~Zz ~ ~/oooo 'S) Gross Site Area (adsq. R.): ~ ~: ~ ~`i '6) Net Sife Area (total site size minus area of public streets B proposed dedicabonsJ: 3 ;3 A~ 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would aRect the pro/ect site (attach addd~ona/ sheet rl necessary: , 8) cos iNIT5TD1 WPD -4/96 Page 2 Indude a description of al! permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other govemmenfal aaenaes m order to ludV implement the pro/eCL~ _ £ abed 96/V - pdM Lp1S11N1 1~ ~ . . :sasn pasodord pays pnN day/ ,Noy pue (•ata 'arrou den+pear 'yeryre) airs ay/ pays mou 1eyJ s/ana/ gray/ pus saynos asrou due agrasap (t l n (dro/shy /aro pus syodar paysr/qnd 's>looq) uogeuuo/u//o saornos//e a/rg •aNs ay/~o spadse/eouo/sry~o~pue/arn//no uMOU>I eyt agrasap (ot J ~~ / ~~~ t ~ O/? s acv S- ~// c/ c~~ f t ~. ~. 7 ~ tly ~pn/r oytey 'sdanrns /eor6o/oayare pus ogo/q 'sarpn/s or6o/arpdy ~o~pue /eor6o/oa6 '•a r) uogeuuo/u/~o raynos //e a/rs u rppe u/ pagrasap sarnJea/ fue~yru6rs~o sydar6oloyd rpepy sarnprutr ay/~o am ayt pus (uogrpuoo pus a6e 6u~pnpu/) airs uo sarnpMs 6ugs~xa due egrnsap spadse oruaos pus 'sasrno~ a6eu~r~p 'spear pus speq 'saar/ arnleur 's/euuue pus s/ue/d'.ygr9ets/ros'dyder6odotuouogeuuolu~6uipnpu~pa/arday/aro~agstsrxapseairsaytlo6uy~ar/e~rrdydaytaqu~rap (6 :i i ' 12) Describe the proposed pro/ect m detail Thrs should prowde en adequate descrrpbon ollhe sde rn terms olu/bmate use wfuch wr// resu/1 fian fhe prosed pro/ed. Indicate dlhere are proposed phases lordeve/opment, the extent o/deve/opment fo ocwr with each phase, and the anticipated completion o/each rnciement. Attach add~bonal sheet(s) i/necessary: 13) Descnbefhesurroundingproperties,rncludmgrnlormabononptantsandanrma/sandanycu/turaf,histortcal,orscemcaspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-lamely, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, liontage, setback, Isar yard, eta): ~` 14) Will the proposed pm/ect change the pattern, scale or character of fhe surrounding general area o/the pruject9 S„)y/e cam INI75TD1 WPD - 4/96 Page 4 'r .t ~y ~ ~ i~~ t ~'ha.~C 15) '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or seenrc beer ~~ ~ ~!/ ~7 /h v ~ 7</'2 P .1 -, by r'vn,~vnd : lZ L? ~ l ~ frees U/e~~ Ye t'~tr~r 17) Indicate any bodies of wafer (induding domesllc water supplies) into which the site drams: 1B) Indkateerrpededamountofwaterusage. (SeeAttachmentAlorusageeshmates). ForluMrerdanficabpn,please the Cucamonga County Water Distnd at 987-2591. a. Resrdenhal (ga(/day) ~DO Peak use (gallDayJ ~2 ~ y b. Commerc)aLRnd. (gaf/day/ae) Peak use (gal/mrn/acJ 19) Indreate proposed method o/sewage disposal Sephc Tank,~_ Sewer. I/septre tanks ate proposed, attaeh percolation tests. /I discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See AttachmentAlorusage esfimates). Forlurtherdanficabon, please contad the Cucamonga County WaterDistnd at987-2591. a Resrdentral (gaYday) Z }~ b. CommeraaNnd. (ga!/day/aeJ RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential undr Z~ Detached (indicate range of pane/ sues, minimum lot sae and maximum lot sue: ~~ x ~O / /YI / A Ui X~~:19a,1 1 nnTCTA~ UIDr1 _ dNR Page 5 lnd~cate the type olshoR-term andlong-teen nose to be generated, induding source and amount How wdl these nose levels aRect adraeent orooerbes and on-srte uses. What methods al sound proofing are proposed? Attached (md~cate whether units are renla/ or /or sale units): S~./e 21) Anhc~pated range o/sale pnces and'/o/r rents: ~7 T _ Sale Pnce(s) S l 9y ~~i l~ to s G ~ J ~ ~ Rent (per month) S to s 22) Speaty number o/ bedrooms by and type ~ ~( ~Jh l ~ 5 3 J) f' c{i•a o~r1 23) Indicate antrupated household srse by unit type' ~! 24) Indicate the expected number o/ school children who will be residing within the pro/ecG Contact the appropnate School Distracts as shown rn Attachment B a. Elementary Zc b Junior Hrgh • ~S t Senior Hrgh ~y COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25J Describe type o/use(s) and major /unctron(s) o/ comme~al, rndustna/ or rnsbtubona/ uses. 26) Total Boor area olcommerpal, rndustnal, orrnsbtutionalusesbytype: INITSTDI WPD -4KJ6 Page 6 T7) lndreate hours of operahon- 28) Number of employees: Total. Maximum ShrR: Time of Maxunum ShiR.• yg) Prowde breakdown of anhcrpated job dassiricabons, rnGudmg wage and salary ranges, as well as an indreabon o/ the rate of hue for eacA Gassrficabon (attach addrlronal sheet r/necessary): 30) Esbma6on of the number of workers to be hired that cunentty msrde m the City: ~ f) For commeraal and indusMal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollubon emissions. (Data shoufr~ venfied through the South Coast Air Ouahty Management Distncl, at (818) 572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood tontro/ agenaes serving Ne pro/ect been confaded to detemune therrabi6ty to provide adequate serwce to the proposedtp~ro/ed7 /trso, please indicate them response. / ~5 C~v/~ r~Nal/~/qty /7~7y ~~TIrJ/3/ o1i1d ~/~S vtr y/'o/r ~l~ r /er i f, '~O iNiT.STD1 WPB - at96 Page 7 33) !n the known hisrory of ttus propedy, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous andrbr tacit matenals7 t=xamples olhazardous and/ortoxrc materials indude, but are notWnded ro PCt3's: radioacbve substances: pesbcides and herbiades: fuels. a/s, solvents, and other flammable ligads and gases. sUSO rwte underground storage of any of the ebova• Please list the materials and describe their use, srorege, and/or discharge on the property, as weU as the dates o/ use, rl known. 34) YlRll the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage ordscharge o/hazardaus and/ortoric materials, rnduding but not bmrted fo those examples listed aboveT Il yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method oldrsposal. fie location olsuch uses, along !nth the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown anld labeled on the appf~catron plans. N ~ I hereby certr/y that the statements /umrshed above and in the a/tached exhibits present the data and in/ormation required /or adequate evaluation of this pro/ed to the best of my ability, that the tads, statements, and /nlormation presented are true and coned tol he best of my know/edge and belie! I lurther understand lhat additional inlormatron maybe required to be submided belore an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cutrer»anga ~ ~ ~iJ Corr~~v~ ftaM~ ~.~~ Date: ~' ~' y ( Signature: _~~~ c~..:/_/ ~..~," Tt/e: ~/ y i ~~ INITSTDI WPD - 4l96 Paae 8 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: Tentative Tract 15783/Variance 96-02 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract 14263 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15783 - G&D CONSTRUCTION - A one-year time extension for the tentative tract map for a residential subdivision and design review of 27 single-family homes on 3 35 acres of land in the Medium Density Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Camelian Street at Vivero Street -APN: 207-022-54 and 64. Associated with this request is a Tree Removal Permit 98-06 and Variance 96-02. VARIANCE 96-02 - G&D CONSTRUCTION - A request to modify the following development standards: 1) reduce the minimum area requirement for the use of Optional Development Standards, 2) reduce the rear yard setback along the north and west protect boundary, 3) reduce the building-to-curb setback, 4) reduce the building-to- budding separation, 5) reduce the average and minimum landscape setback along Carnelian Street, 6) reduce the parking streetscape setback, and 7) increase the wall height along the north and west protect boundary, for a residential subdivision and design review of 27 single-family homes on 3.35 acres of land in the Medwm Density Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street -APN: 207-022-54 and 64. Related Files: Tentative Tract 14263 and Tentative Tract 15783. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Todd Leibl, CFO G & D Construction, Inc. 25 North Santa Anita Avenue, Suite A Arcadia, CA 91006 626-447-3118 5. 6. General Plan Designation: Medwm Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Zoning: Medwm Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: No change to the existing surrounding setting has occurred since the Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted in March 1998. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential and a CCWD water tank to the north, Cucamonga Creek Channel along the southwesterly site boundary, and single family residential east of Carnelian Street. The protect site is currently vacant, although there were previously several single-family residences on the northern portion of the protect. All of the structures have been demolished. The site slopes approximately s i C3a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. Page 2 six percent from north to south. There are 45 existing trees on-site, 43 of which are slated for removal, and two wdl be relocated on-site. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Doug Fenn, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None C33 • Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, involving at least one Impact that is "Potentially Signrficant Impact," "Potentially Signrficant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages ()Land Use and Planning () Populatwn and Housing (/) Geological Problems (/) Water (/) fur Qualrty (/) Transportahon/Circulation (/) Biological Resources ()Energy and Mineral Resources ()Hazards Noise of ()Public Sernces () UtdiUes and Sernce Systems OAesthetics OCultural Resources () Recreation DETERMINATION On the bases of this Initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION well be prepared. (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed pro)ect MAY have a sgnficant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed In an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, rf the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed pro)ect could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, Including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Signer C3~ C~ Apnl 19, 2000 Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Paemmpy sq~M Impee Leae Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pot"npeAy unless Then sgnMpeM Mnl~ron slpNll®,d No Im d I tetl Im I 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? () ( ) () (/) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () ( ) () (/) policies adopted by agencies Huth jurisdiction over the protect? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (/) vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/) established community? Comments• a-d) The proposed protect is within the Medium Density land use designation of the General Plan and the Medium Density Residential District Previous approvals by the City Council (GPA 89-02A and DDA 87-12) modified the land use designation and district from Flood Control to Medium Density Residential. The proposed project has been designed in accordance Hnth the Medium Density Residential District, with the exception of those items included in Variance 96-02 The proposed protect is the establishment of a 27-lot subdivision on 3.35 acres consistent with the Medium Density Residential District (8-14 du/ac). Therefore the proposed project will not result in conflicts to general plan, or zoning, or be incompatible with the surrounding environment Pplenlielly slgnlM1Unt Impel Lms Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pater u~ T^e^ slgnifimm ntllfpeson SgnMCanl No I I e4 I cl 1 ct 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal• a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (/) population prolections~ b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e.g., through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? C3S Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Potenlialy SlgMficBM Impeq Lem Issues and Supporting Information Sources• ralenmuy unlem Ttun sreIllrKeM MMget~on sgmnoM No Im I tail I a I c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/) housing Comments: a-b) Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The proposed proled v~nll result in 27 single-family residences in the Medwm Density Residential Distnct (8-14 du/ac), no increase In density is proposed The proposed project is consistent with the general plan land use density for the site, and will not result in a significant increase in population not otherwise planned by the City in its forecasts c) The site is currently void of any structures. No existing housing is located onsde Potentlady slpMnrem 1„gatl Len Issues and Supporting Information Sources. voteM~ly unlm. roan sl~.~eM retgmm sgmnaM No 1 I tee I I 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEJVIS. Would the proposal result m or expose people to potential impacts involving• a) Fault rupture? () () () (/) b) Seismic ground shaking? () () (/) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including Iiquefaction~ () () (/) ( ) d) Seiche hazards? () () () (/) e) Landslides or mudflows? () () () (/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil () (/) () ( ) conditions from excavation, grading, or fill g) Subsidence of the land? () () () (/) h) Expansive sods? () () () (/) i) Unique geologic or physical features? () () () (/) Comments• alb) No known faults pass through the site, rt is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault The Red Hill Fault passes immediately south of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 miles northerly These faults are both capable of producing ~ 6.0 - 7 0 earthquakes, respectively Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to tvl,Y 7 5 earthquakes is 12 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to tvln, 8.2 earthquakes, Is 13 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. i f._~ i ~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. Page 6 c) Figure V-4 of the General Plan identrfies that the site is within an area subled to ground failures, such as liquefaction, and as such has the potential to expose people and property to geologic hazards Based upon this condition, a Soils Engineering Investigation Report was prepared for the protect sde (Richard Mills and Associates, Inc , Sods Engmeenng Investigation, October 10, 1988) The report evaluated soil condtions at the site to assess their potential impact on proposed development, and to provide recommendations to mitigate any potentially adverse sod conditions The report concluded that liquefaction is not a potential hazard at the subject site due to the depth of the water table and the grain size of the soils (RMA, page 7, 3.07 Liquefaction) The site is otherwise located on stable sods, adhering to the Uniform Building Code and all recommendations of the Sods Engmeenng Investigation Hrill ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrFicant. d) The site is not located near a body of water e) The site lies on a planar alluvial fan emanating from the San Gabriel Mountains and is not in the path nor on any existing landslide or mudflow (RMA, page 4, 2 04 Slope Stability) f) The design of the protect sfte and construction of the proposed grading and structures shall follow the recommendations of the sods engineer and shall comply with the current building standards and codes at the time of construction A Mitigation Monitoring Plan was adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the tract map Implementation of mitigation measures associated with approval of the map will reduce impacts to less than sign cant. g/h) Sod type on-site and in the vicinity is Ramona-Arlington. The soils encountered during the test borings on-site consisted of silty sands with gravel near the surface, with increasing amounts of gravel and cobbles as depth increases. These sods are basically coarse-grained non-plastic, and non-expansive m nature (RMA, page 4, 2.02 Subsurface sod Conditions). The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. vrnmmuy s~mrnm ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources. v«~u.or u , sgmr~m Mrcgeuon sq~m~m Fio Im a 1 Ie0 Im I 4. WATER. Will the proposal resuR rn: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () (/) () ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related () (/) () ( ) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/) of surface water quality (e g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? C'~~ n ~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Polenlbly SipNMaM Impact Leo Issues and Supporting Information Sources potentially unto rn.e Signifcenl Mitpatlon 516NIkant No Im d I leo Im q I d d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (/) water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (/) through direct additions or vnthdrawals, or through interception of an aquffer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? () () () (/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? () () () (/) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (/) groundwater otherwnse available for public water supplies? Comments: a) The project is expected to result in incremental changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns due to an increase of paved surface area. The City Engineer must review and approve sde and drainage plans that show that all runoff will be conveyed to existing and proposed drainage facilities which were designed to handle the subfect water flows. b) The installation of frontage street improvements, including flood protection measures to be determined by the final drainage study, will alter the cross section of flood waters in Camelian Street. The developer will be required to mitigate any increase in the depth of flow through the installation of adequate catch basins to offset any changes in the capacity of the existing drainage facility south of the protect entry. A Mitigation Monitoring Plan was adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the tract map. Implementation of mitigation measures associated with approval of the map will reduce impacts to less than sign cant. Carnelian Street is in a Flood Zone A. The developer will be required to install flood protection measures, to the satisfaction of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, allowing the designation to be removed from the project site. A Mitigation Monitoring Plan was adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the tract map. Implementation of mitigation measures associated vlnth approval of the map will reduce impacts to less than sign cant. The City recently completed construction of improvements to Carnelian Street, including drainage improvements However, the developer will still be required to prepare a drainage plan to show how the site will be developed in contunction with the new drainage improvements on Carnelian Street, per the Mitigation Monitoring Plan. ~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 c-e) The protect site is not located near a body of water f-i) The protect vlnll not interfere with groundwater management practices m the area The site is not used for groundwater recharge PoteNbsy sgNfiwN Impep Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources PaenllaAy SgnHkant Im p unbsa MIIIpaUOn I lea "'°" S,gnMON Im No I d 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal. a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (/) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? () (/) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (/) cause any change in climate d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (/) Comments• a-b) Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element vnthin the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be emitted from grading the site. Nonetheless, dust emissions could be sufficient to warrant the use of water or other dust palliatives at this site Sources of emissions dunng construction include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces. NOx and PM,o levels may be exceeded during this phase. A Mitigation Monitonng Plan was adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the tract map. Implementation of mitigation measures associated with approval of the map will reduce impacts to less than sign cant. c-d) The proposed 27 single-family residences will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or obtectionable odors PotanUesy S,gNfiraM Impeq Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~'"^~"~' Significenl Im tl u^'°" Ml~patlon In ee T"a" SlpNficenl Im No Im 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in • a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? () () (/) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g., () (/) () ( ) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment)? 2A CJ \ Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 PolemiaGy SlgnMCam Impecl Lep Issues and Supporting Information Sources: rasnu.ey unlem rMn spmlom MHgatlon sgnmcam No Im In IeE I I c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (~) nearby uses? d) Insuffiaent parking capacity on-site or off-sde? () () () (~) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? () () () (~) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (~) alternative transportation (e g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? O O O (~) Comments• a) The proposed 27 single-family residences will incrementally increase traffic in the immediate vicinity The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan, for which street widths were evaluated at a build-out condition The developer wall be required to install street frontage improvements m their ultimate configuration, per Cdy Ordinance, and pay associated Transportation Development Fees. Therefore, this impact is less than sign cant. b-d) A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for the protect (O'Rourke Engineering, Traffic Impact Analysis, August 1989). The traffic report evaluated roadway conditions and determined that intersection improvements are warranted based on existing conditions and not as result of the proposed project. To minimize the potential for traffic conflicts, the project was designed to align the driveway with Vivero Street to the east, and will be required to install a traffic signal at the Carnelian Street and Vivero Street intersection. A Mitigation Monitoring Plan was adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the tract map. Implementation of mitigation measures associated vrith approval of the map will reduce impacts to less than sign cant. e/f) The proposed project is appropriately designed to avoid posing a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists. g) Located four miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft. I. Cho Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G8D Construction, Inc City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 awmtmuy sgmrwem Inpad lma Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paa^I~ly ~^~ TM^ sgnifiwnt Mltigebon SIgNMam No Im C I le0 I d Im 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (~) habitats (including, but not limited to. plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e g., heritage trees, () () () (~) eucalyptus vnndrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., () (/) () ( ) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.) d) Wetland habitat (e g., marsh, npanan, and () () () (~) vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? () () () (~) Comments• a) The protect site does not contain Natural Resources as identified on Figure V-3 of the General Plan Additionally, the site does not contain any Coastal Sage Scrub, Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, or Delhi-Sands flowering-loving fly habitat. b/c) The proposed protect includes the removal of 43 trees located within site boundanes. The matority proposed for removal are Eucalyptus sideroxlyn roses (Red Ironbark) which were planted as part of the Carnelian Beautification Protect, and are in conflict with the street right-of-way improvements along Carnelian Street and internal circulation improvements. Extensive arborist studies were preformed to determine the health and condition of the existing trees, and their suitability for preservation in-place or through transplanting on-site. Because of their location within the protect boundanes as compared to the proposed development, no trees are proposed to be preserved in-place A Mitigation Monitonng Plan was adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the tract map. Implementation of mitigation measures associated with approval of the map will reduce impacts to less than significant. The City recently completed construction of improvements to Carnelian Street that resulted in the removal of some of the trees located within the site boundaries. So the number of trees that will be removed due to the proposed protect would be less. However, the developer will still be required to replace trees on-site as they are removed, per the Mitigation Monitoring Plan d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site e) The site is undeveloped, however, development in the immediate area has eliminated any wildlife comdors that may have occurred in the past ~~~ Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G8D Construction, Inc. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 sls~sr~m Impel Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources m u~ T^'^ SlgMfiwM MN~EOn SIgNM1UM qo Im I Im I 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources In a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments• a-b) The protect will be required to conform to applicable City standards for energy conservation. c) The project site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classed as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the Sate Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. PotenUaEy sgmnc.m Impep ~~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources raeMmoy ueless rne^ spnifiuM MlUgatlon syNRam No I I led Im I 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (/) hazardous substances (Including, but not limited to• oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (/) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (/) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (/) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (/) brush, grass, or trees Comments• a/c-d) There is no evidence of prior commercial or industrial uses. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils have been C~a • Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. C~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 observed. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site b) The tract map has been designed to accommodate emergency vehicles and is accessible from two access points e) The site is not located in a fire hazard area. PolelmeM SlgnificeM Impact Leo Issues and Supporting Information Sources PolenOalty unbaa ilun s~gmrwem tenon sgninp.m No Im d I ed Im I 10. NOISE. Wdl the proposal result rn: a) Increases in existing noise levels () () () (/) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? () (/) () ( ) Comments: a/b) A noise study was prepared (Davy & Associates, August 1988) to determine the noise exposure and necessary mitigation measures for development of the protect site The report concludes that noise impacts are a result of traffic-related noise on Carnelian Street, and that the proposed protect will not increase the existing noise levels to the surrounding area A Mitigation Monitoring Plan was adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the tract map. Implementation of mitigation measures associated with approval of the map will reduce impacts to less than significant. Poleniblty slpnMn~n ImpM Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~nlem~h u^w. TMn SpnMloln IAtlpatbn SgnMUnl IJo Impact Inarpcrelae Impact Impep 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result rn a need for new or altered government services rn any of the following areas• a) Fire protections () () () (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Maintenance of public facdiUes, including roads? O O O (/) e) Other governmental services? () () () (/) Comments:. a-e) Fire Protection -The site, located on the west side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street, is served by a fire station located near either 19"' and Amethyst (approximately two miles northeasterly of the protect site) or San Bernardino Road at Leucite Avenue (approximately one mile southeasterly of the protect site). C~3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Trail 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. Page 13 Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project. Police protection -The proposed project will incrementally increase the need for routine police protection services. Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the Clty Council the developer will be responsible for paying all appropnate fees. Schools -The proposed project will incrementally increase the need for schools through the potential for increased population growth. Consistent Huth the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fees established by the school distract the developer Hell pay all appropnate development impact fees. Parks -The proposed project will incrementally increase the need for park and recreation services through the potential for increased population growth. Consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council the developer wilt pay all appropnate development impact fees. Public faallties -The proposed project will incrementally increase traffic on adjacent streets. Consistent wrath the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council the developer will pay all appropnate development impact fees PolerNaly SipNbcanl Impea Laa Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~~ ~~~ *~ SgNM1ram Miti~tlon sgnMnm No I h I Ib Im I 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result m a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utdrties: a) Power or natural gas? () () () (/) b) Communication systems? () () () (/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (/) faci6Ues? d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (/) e) Storm water drainage? () () () (/) f) Solid waste disposal? () () () (/) g) Local or regional water supplies? () () () (/) Comments: a-g) The proposed project will include the construction of 27 single-family residences. The proposed development well extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available In the Immediate area. The proposed project will not require major modifications or alterations to the existing utility systems. C~v~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract 15783 - G8D Construction, Inc Page 14 ~~~~ $igmfiram Impel lam Issues and Supporting Information Sources pdentleny unlam roan $Ignlfiwnl MNgieon SlgniM1Cant fJo Im 1 tad Im cl I 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () ( ) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effects () () ( ) c) Create light or glare? () () ( ) (/) (/) (/) Comments: a/b) The site will be landscaped along the streetscape as well as through the site, and developed in conformance with all residential design guidelines and general plan policies c) The proposed protect will incrementally add to the creation of additional light or glare within the area due to additional street lights. Similar single-family development is existing m the immediate viamty. The site plans will include proposed street lighting m conformance with City standards. Pdemany $pn,MZM Impel Lam Issues and Supporting Informatton Sources Paannely unlam rlun $Ignlfipnt MIIIgeOOn SIgnlApnt No Im c1 In tetl Im d Im 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb paleontological resources? () () () (~) b) Disturb archaeological resources? () () () (~) c) Affect histoncal or cultural resources? () () () (~) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (~) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses wdhin () () () (/) the potential impact areal Comments• a-e) The site is vacant with single family homes to the north and east On the west and south is the Cucamonga Creek channel, a drainage feature constructed and maintained for flood control These previously developed areas around the site have not produced any resources. It is unlikely that development of the site would impact cultural resources. CAS Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 PoIMlially SigNfrant Inpep Lm Issues and Supporting Information Sources aa,ntmly unlesf in"n $Ignlflcanl Mdgatron SlgnMaM No Im ct In eteE Im d Im cl 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities O O O (~) Comments• a) The proposed protect will incrementally increase the need for park and recreation services through population growth. The protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the developer will pay the appropriate fees in accordance with Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council. b) There is no impact to existing recreational opportunities as the site and property surrounding the protect area is designated for residential development and flood control related to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. raemrely signlx.m Impact Lms Issues and Supporting Information Sources: paa"n"In u^1°° TM" SIpNfl®nl MWgaapn slgNllronl No I d 1 tetl I I 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential to achieve short-tens, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future ) (`~) (/) C~~R Initial Study for Tentative Tract 15783 - G&D Construction, Inc. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 vamualy SpNfiranl Impep Les! Issues and Supporting Information Sources q~M~m ~ u s ,~,,, ~~,,, m s No Im d I Ie0 Im Im c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that () () (/) ( ) are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have () () () (/) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments• a) The project site does not contain Natural Resources as identified on Figure V-3 of the General Plan. Additionally, the site does not contain any Coastal Sage Scrub, Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub, or Delhi-Sands flowering-loving fly habitat. No sensitive species were detected on-site and it is unlikely any will move on to the site due to the lack of natural habitat. b) During construction, there is the possibilrty of fugftive dust to be emitted from grading the site Nonetheless, dust emissions could be sufficient to warrant the use of water or other dust palliatives at this srte Sources of emissions dunng this phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a resuR of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces. NO, and PM,o levels may be exceeded dunng this phase. A Mftigation Mondoring Plan was adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the trail map. Implementation of mitigation measures associated with approval of the map will reduce impacts to less than significant. c) The developer is required to pay development impact fees established by the City Council, the rates of which have been set to mitigate the potential impacts to fire protection service, police protection services, parks and recreational facilities, and other governmental services to less than significant. To the extent the protect may impact utility resources provided by private utility companies, potential impacts upon such services will be mitigated by payment of rates and fees set by each utility agency. The protect will also pay transportation impact fees to mitigate incremental imapcts to the traffic system. d) The proposed protect on three-acres would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The site is located in an residential area along Carnelian Street Mitigation measures are included in a mitigation monitoring plan adopted with the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted in March 1998. Therefore impacts are less than significant. cap C~ Initial Study for Tentative Tracl 15783 - G8D Construction, Inc. EARLIER ANALYSES City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed m an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this protect were v~nthm the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized m completmg this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Plannmg Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): • General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) • Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, cert~ed January 4, 1989) • Initial Study prepared for Tentative Tract 14263, October 1989. • Soils Engineering Investigation, Richard Mills Associates, Inc, October 1988. • Acoustical Analysis, Davy & Associates, Inc August 1988. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. nn'1 /~~j KU~or~.Slr~cf:a~~~~c. Signature: /~~ '~.+, ~/~,..-~2~j~~'-" Date: Y 26 ~O Print Name and Title: CJd~ ~ Ge /~i~i~~., e/' ~~ f~ -\'v City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: TT 15783 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flexible guidelines. As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP wdl be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance v~nll be reported. All momtonng and reporting documentation Hell be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Ciwc Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 C"~v \ Mitigation Monitonng Program Page 2 3 Appropnate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner. 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Forth After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further monitonng will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forth 6 Unanticipated circumstances may anse requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form Hell be completed by fhe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after written notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the authonty to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department The Department shall require the applignt to post any necessary funds (or other fomu of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required penod of time. 9. In those instances requmng long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitonng the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitonng results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director pnor to the issuance of building permits. 11FINAL~CEQANAMP Fom~+ev N'Pd C~ i Project File No.: TT 15783 Initial Study Prepared by: _ Nancv Ferguson Prepare Final Sofls InvesttgaUon Report Applicant: G & D Construction Date: ADri119.2000 final Install catch basins and Uood protection measures to offset changes in capacity of extsttng drainage facilities Install street Improvements and pay associated Transportation Development Fees Two Palm Trees shall be preserved through relocation wnthin the protect boundanes Other trees shall be replaced vnth largest nursery grown stock available per Tree Removal Permit 98-06 Prepare a Final Acoustical Analysts to determine noise source and level and appropnate mi6gaGon measures. Key to Checklist Abbreviations 1.1PLANNINGIFINAL\CEOAVdMCHKLST. W PD MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) newnw Or aramage I c/A I I t/y report and plans Rewaw Sheet Improvement plans ..r o/c Review and approve C/A y3 landscape plans to CP B/C address relocaLon, removal and replacement report end mltigedon ~\ ,~° LJ .r{qa u (apa4 \ ~_ ~ ..,. ....Q z..... \~ - n»r v .. rn m.~,. ~....r as rH~ ~ \ \\ ~rir.. r !r i..r .Wy ar w /` ` \\ \. ry~~/T \ ~~ i Maid ~ r ~ \~~~\ ~ ~ \~\ ,~ :a~ ~ ~~~~\~ Y A ~ /fyf r+Y ~r N t i t IIIAI1 .n ~ {] • ` R pC/N?/ MAP TTT _( O~/r~l ~ 1 TENTATIVE TRACT NO 15783 .-,..~ . ~- .~rrlar++wrnrww rr:wsrw rrn~~ws< ~.ra.wi ariuvw+.w R.se w.r.«w«mavrwr x ..wc,,.r.W^. n.nrar ~srv aeown.. gIMF !Pl Y16'11~IrtY.~M14T ~~ Z~~ H Wiper n/ / IN! ... A.. ,.~~, n y N ,,..r ,ar , ~I _ II r~ ~ L-_J ~~ ~. M. „- ,r 1~ ... ,,.-wi.. 's W r L ~ ~ ,ti I ~y _ i ~ Ih E ,~ ~, III. i i`~ . ~ Ilt~ i ~._ ~ ~ ip III , ~~- y I~I . t ~~ a~ J ~ \ 3 ~tl 4 ~ =~~~ ° II1l r ~ .~ ~ ~~ ~i ~ ~ M ~ N I r M J .~v r ~Mr~ i 1 ~ p ru-'~ i• i• • RESOLUTION NO 02-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FORAN EXTENSION OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15783, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 27SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 3 35 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET AT VIVERO STREET, IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 207-022-54 AND 64 A Rectals 1. G 8 D Construction filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15783, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject tentative tract map time extension request is referred to as "the application " 2 On March 25, 1996, this Commission adopted its Resolution 98-20, thereby approving Tentative TraG Map SUBTT15783, subtect to specfic conditions and time limits 3 On May 10, 2000, this Commission granted a time extension and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 On the 10th day of Apnl 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date 5 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rectals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on Apnl 10, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specfically finds as follows a The previously approved tentative tract map is in substantial compliance with the City's curent General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies, and b The extension of the tentative tract map approval Hell not cause significant inconsistenciesmonth the curent General Plan, speafic plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and polices, and c The extension of the tentative tract map approval is not likely to cause public health and safety problems, and d The extension of the tentative tract map is within the time limds established by State law and local ordinance, and C~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-41 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION Apnl 10, 2002 Page 2 e The extension of the tentative tract map is in compliance with the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the Plamm~g Commission on May 10, 2000 3 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for Aoplication Aoalicant Exoiration Tentative Tract Map G & D Construction Apnl 10, 2003 SUBTT15783 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Larry T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plamm~g Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plamm~g Commission held on the 10th day of Apnl 2002, by the folloHnng vote-to-Nnt AYES COMMISSIONERS. NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS c~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-41 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION Apnl 10, 2002 Page 2 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT15783 Aaolication Applicant G & D Construction Expiration Apnl 10, 2003 45 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY T McNiel, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of April 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS Csy 34 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE• Apnl 10, 2002 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY. Dan Coleman, Pnncipal Planner SUBJECT VIRGINIA DARE PARKING STUDY - A review of modificetions to the shared parking concept and protected parking demand for the Virginia Dare Centre - APN: 107-766-101 through 105, 110, 114, and 116 through 118. ABSTRACT. The purpose of this report is for the Planning Commission to review and determine d the proposed shared parking concept and the protected parking demand for the different land uses in the Virginia Dare Centre is adequate and acceptable, and if not, to determine the Mitigation Measures and provide direction to staff and the applicant. BACKGROUND The onginal Master Plan and Conditional Use Penult for the Virginia Dare Centre was approved by the Planning Commisslon on June 8, 1983 On December 12, 1984, the Planning Commission approved the revised Master Plan that included an 1,800-seat theater based upon a shared parking concept. Design Review approval of the theater was approved by the Planning Commission on July 24, 1985 The 1,800-seat theater required a minimum of 455 parking spaces within 300 feet Apart of the applicant's request at that time was the approval of the shared parking concept based upon the nighttime demand for theater parking One of the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit "C") for the theater stipulated that at the time any office structure is proposed that would require more than 85 parking spaces adtacent to the theater, the applicant must submit a detailed parking analysis to determine If there is adequate parking for all the operating and ultimate proposed uses The study was to be reviewed by the Planning Commission, and if a conflict existed between the theater and other uses, then the Commission would consider modification to reduce the square footage of the un-built remaining office buildings in an amount commensurate with the parking overlay, limit the hours of . operation for the cinema, or impose other appropnate means of assunng adequate parking. The 85 parking spaces were "used up" with the development of the office building north of the cinema; therefore, no further buildings can be built until the Commission approves a new parking study ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VIRGINIA DARE CENTRE PARKING STUDY Apnl 10, 2002 Page 2 Parking within the Virginia Dare Centre was last reviewed by the Planning Commission in 1988. The Commission reviewed a study prepared by Austin-Foust for a proposal to build a 3-story, 57,000 square foot, office building on the pad south of the cinema The Planning Commission accepted the study subtect to elimination of cinema matinees on non-holiday weekdays, and providing a 10 percent "buffer" over the protected peak parking demand to prevent cars from "rolling" through the parking lot waiting for a parking space to become available. The new parking study (Exhibit "A") was preepitated by a proposal to develop additional office space within the complex Over the past few years, venous developers have explored the potential of building offices on the pad south of the enema. Also, discussions with potential developers indicate a desire to convert the enema into two floors of offices totaling approximately 40,000 square feet. There are two remaining undeveloped office pads in the Virginia Dare Centre. The first, and largest, is located south of the cinema and would include 136 new parking spaces. Recently, staff has had preliminary discussions v~nth a developer interested m building approximately 20,000 square feet of office buildings on the pad south of the cinema. The second is a small pad located south of Del Taco, which was onginally approved for 15,000 square feet of office. The last of the restaurants within the former food court area within Virginia Dare Centre has closed and the space is being converted to office uses. Office uses demand fewer parking spaces (4 1000) than restaurants (10:1000). ANALYSIS• The Development Code allows shared parking based upon offset peak demand hours. In other words, if two businesses have different hours when they are busiest, then it is possible for both to share parking In the Virginia Dare CenUe, the enema did not provide parking and was allowed to share the parking provided by the other tenants based upon the assumption that cinema peaks in the evenings and weekends when most other tenants are closed. The 1988 parking study proved that the enema's peak parking need was in the evenings and on weekends. The current parking study was completed in 2001, at a time when the entire complex was almost fully leased/occupied, except for the cinema Therefore, staff believes that the study provides an accurate picture of parking demand for the offices and Foothill Gnll and Del Taco restaurants The study found that peak parking hours on weekdays was 11 00 a.m. and between 9.00 a m and 10.00 a.m on Saturdays. The study determined that at the busiest times, the Virginia Dare Centre parking lots were only 50 percent full Allowing fora 10 percent buffer, the study concludes that over 50,000 square feet of additional office space could be built without overloading available parking for existing tenants. CORRESPONDENCE: All property owners within the Virginia Dare Centre were notified concerning this parking study review oa PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VIRGINIA DARE CENTRE PARKING STUDY April 10, 2002 Page 3 CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the study's conclusions are further strengthened by the conversion of the food court into office space because this reduces parking demand by about 50 percent for the food court. Based upon the parking study and recent tenant changes within the complex, staff concludes that a total of 58,000 square feet of office space can be added to the Virginia Dare Centre, including the conversion of the cinema to offices. Additional square footage may be possible if the parking study were updated to reflect conversion of the food court to offices. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission accept the study as adequate and complete. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:DC/fc Attachments: Exhibit °A° - Parking Study (Austin-Foust, dated June 14, 2001) Exhibit °B° - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Plannng Commission Resolution No. 85-112 ~3 run io ur u~:u~p HUSLliI-hOUSt 1714) ss7-7952 ®~®AUST/N-fOUST ASSOC/AYES /NC. iAA FFIC ENGINFFRINO AND iFA NBPCRiA iION PLANN/MO 2020 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE ~ SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706.7627 TELEPHONE (714) 887-0498 FAX (714) 667.7852 Etnell: mall®austlnfoustcom ONINNtlld " ~~ MEMORANDUM ~ooz ~ t inr tl9N0~Itl0n0 OHONtld ~0 JWJ TO: Mr. Jim Hazdacre, Lennaz Paztners i FROM: Jce Foust, P.E. DATE: June 14, 2001 SUBJECT: VIRGINIA DARE PARHiQYG STUDY INTRODUCTION The Edwards Cinema Theater in the existing Vir~iaia Dare Center at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue is closed and I.ennar Par'nets desires to increase the current office space. Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) has coaduct4d a pazking survey of the Center W identity the peak pazking demand and determine the feasibility of adding additional office space. ANALYSIS The original Virginia Daze Center parking plan c,~lled for a total of 793 spaces to be available and used on a shared use basis. At present only 657 spaces are m place since a portion of the Center has yet to be developed. When these two remaining azeas ire burl[ out, the full 793 spaces are expected to be available. Even so, the peak utilization of the 657 s aces was surveyed. Hour-by-hour parking counts were counted for three weekdays and two Saturda s m May-June, 2001. Table 1 indicates the maximum parking observed on each day. The results of a hour-by-hour parking observations are presented in the appendix. Examination of Table 1 indicates a maximum of 33~ of the tota1657 spaces were over occupied. ThLS means that the remaining 324 spaces aze vacant. Review of the current leases in the Center show it to be fully leased except for 4,450 squaze feet (7 974 and $ 058 Haven). If leased, the remaming 4,450 square feel would utilize approximately 20 to 24 spaces, lehving about 300 vacant spaces that could be used by new office space. This is equivalen4go 75,OOb~sgi~aze feet of new space at a 4 space per TSF parking demand. However, adding a total of 75,000 squad feet more office space would result in a lot theoretically 100 percent full. Good engineering design specifies a maximum utilization of 90 percent for office type land uses. Based on a 90 percent peak utilization factor the 657 total spaces are reduced ~~ p.2 I~ u Jun 15 O1 [13:173p Bustin-Foust [7141 667-7952 p.3 LennazPaztners ".; Page 2 Tune 14, 2001 to 591 maximum occupied spaces. Hased on this 90 percent peak occupancy design concept, a total of 204 vacant spaces is available (561.333-24 =204) for new offices. This equates to just over 58,000 square feet of office space at a 4-space per TSF of office pazking requirement. A detailed investigation of the pazking distribution indicates the areas behind the closed Edwards Theaters (zones 12,13 and 16) and where the new offices would be located are sparsely used which means re-use of the building would not have a serious impact on other tenants' parking areas. CONCLU51ON In summary, it has been determined that the existing Vuginia Dare Center has 657 total spaces currently marked and the maximum utilizatibh observed was 50 percent. Since the existing Center is almost fully leased (except for 4,450 square feet), this means that almost half the pazking lot is available to support new office uses. Hased on a peak 90 percent utilization factor, over 50,000 squaze feet of additional office uses could be built within the existing Center without overloading available parking for existing tenants. ;' : . , ~J . p5 v rl •, Iltlllll•'I s i ,' - _ _ u ., . ;. T,~ ~. .- ~. . of ~H' is ~f '~ -. .' , dl \'~ ~ '~ ! 11 (1 ~~ i / I.I 1 ail - ~ '• •. :~~ '. !' I III ~ _ 11 ' I Irl ' ' I1 111 ~ .1 MSO...p ~ _~ r~ s s..~ YII r • • . J~.. • 41Y.~ • • • ~ • r" i • I ~ r..•:•' ~ ~ • •'~ ' •' ..y 1111111 ' ' ~- r• '~ 1 i ~ • • BUILDING DATA ~, ~ ~~~~~ ~ ' •'" ~• ~ '+"~• .' ' • . OFF.ICE/f1NANCIAt/f~ETNL.J~;~ S•F• CIGAR"~~ ~5~~P ~y'• :.. • ~ • ~ • ' . RESTAURANT 1~i! ~ ~~ ' ' • • S.f. S F • (I CAR PER •lo0 6.F 6Fta~ uP, To <ar~0 ~' F1 THEN I ~ 5g~ ~ THEATERS • • PARKING DA ~' park~"9 5~'~ 2°µe`' PARKING REGUIREOs yL~OFF)CE/FINANCI CARS • RESTAtlRANi 1 CARS ~ • ~ ' TOTAL REBORED: 77 : ~, ; . • _ PARING PROYi~D: ... ~` '• STANDARD' (9x19) 5ri7 CARS r;IrJGLUDEwS ~' ~'~~ F;~T' ~Al~il.Ej COMPACT (75x16) ~JO • (3521 ! ~ 'r •.., n/o~rrH HANDICAPPED (14sc19) Iro (2Z> ~ ~ ~ ' Jun 14 O1 03:58p Rustin-Foust [714) 667-7952 p.4 Table 1 Peak Parking Demand Virginia Dare Center Z.Obrl.w- ~~:bDo •w /0:o0a.tN 9;poA.u~. Jun 14 01 03:59p Bustin-Foust [7141 667-7952 p.5 Traffic Data Services, Inc. (114) 54l-222 PARKINfi STWr CITY: RAtlgq CUCANONfiA FILENAME: OSIYYP01 '~ LOCATION: V1R6TNLA DARE CENTER HAVEN b FOOTHILL DATE: 5/P4/Ol TINE ZONES Period BeOinning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 0 !0 SPACES: li 33 34 35 IB 52 28 27 81 Y7 6:00 AM 30 AM 7:00 AN 0 6 3 4 0 4 1 0 0 1 30 AM 8:00 AM 0 4 3 S, 0 0 2 0 0 3 30 AM 9:00 AN 10 27 34 30 21 24 20 4 15 5 30 AM 10:00 AM 11 31 32 33 34 27 22 1 P8 7 30 AN 11:00 AN 10 PS 33 34 41 36 L4 8 24 11 30 AM 1Y:00 NOON 10 2B 30 31 44 39 25 7 YS l4 30 PM 1;00 PM 9 Z3 33 32 40 36 2J 8 22 8 30 PM 2:00 PM 11 27 32 34 42 10 LO 11 26 11 30 PM 3:00 PM 8 L 93 31 39 44 Y5 18 P4 10 90 PM 4:00 PN 8 17 34 26 41 37 16 14 25 16 30 PN 5:00 PN 10 21 34 28 43 37 19 15 27 12 30 PN 6:00 P# 2 15 ffi 7 16 29 ?3 18 11 6 30 PM 7:00 PM 30 PM 8:00 PM 90 PM 9:00 PM DAw TiNiRSDAr lY ZONES 13 14 15 19 17 18 19 20 TOTAL 39 100 50 4P 4S 657 0 4 0 0 0 25 1 6 4 1 0 96 6 10 9 15 0 P34 9 14 11 18 1 E84 • 7 U 18 L1 L 324 B 19 16 19 2 92B 1 6 18 23 4 301 __ -- /I'' 9 16 21 20 1 3S3 ~~c 8 7 7 11 L 297 7 5 9 7 2 266 9 11 12 !0 1 285 7 15 8 1 1 181 `. J Y~ Jun 14 01 03:59p ~ Hustin-Foust (7141 667-7952 p.6 Treffic DaW Services, Ine_ (714) 541-2228 PANKIN6 STUD LOCATION: YIR6 INIA OARS CENIEM CITi: RANCHO HAYEN b FOOTHILL ~ OATS: 5/28/01 --- --- -- - - DAY: TIESOA7 FILENAME: 051P2POE ~ TIME IONES -----r - -- ZONES --- - - Period 8egirming 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 10 1 ~ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 TOTAL ' SPATES: 12 33 34 35 ~ 52 28 P7 61 P7 1 99 106 50 42 43 057 6:00 AN 30 AM 7:00 AN 1 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 I 1 P Y 6 0 PI 30 AM 8:00 AN 10 15 7 22 4 8 9 4 8 1 3 3 7 11 0 117 30 AM 9:00 AM 10 21 17 3P 10 11 15 16 16 3 5 5 8 14 0 168 30 AM 10:00 AM 30 M 9 33 34 31 12 14 P1 19 28 5 8 i? 9 !7 0 257 11:00 AM 10 ?9 34 31 17 26 18 PP 3P 7 10 IB 11 18 0 281 Pgq~( 30 AN 12:00 MOON 8 30 3a 31 U 2y 20 17 31 8 5 8 15 16 16 0 281 30 PM 1:00 PM 7 2B 32 30 9 23 11 13 16 7 11 12 14 2l 9 0 y4; SO PN 2:00 PM I1 33 34 33 ' 12 30 10 16 P8 8 7 7 10 15 10 0 273 30 PM 3:00 PN !0 33 94 3Y 11 27 17 18 P4 8 9 11 iY U 11 0 288 ~ 30 PN 4:00 PN I1 33 34 33 14 44 PO 22 29 16 6 B 8 5 7 0 285 30 PN 5:00 PN 11 39 34 31 30 38 16 21 19 12 7 10 it 10 8 0 271 • 30 PN 6:00 PM 7 24 15 !0 13 23 14 18 14 7 5 6 12 6 3 0 177 30 PM 7:00 PM 30 FM 8:00 PM 30 PN 9:00 PM • v ~ Jun 14 O1 03:59p Rustin-Foust [7141 667-7952 p.7 4. TriffiC Qata Sarviws~ 1110. (114) 541-2226 PARKINfi STODT LOCATION: YIRBIMIA DARE CEHiFIt NAYEN 8 FOOTHILL GATE: 6/01/01 DAY: FRIDAY TINE r ZONES Period 8e01min0 1 Y 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I ~ ~• CITY: RANRBp CUffJUIMIfiA FILENAME: 05122P03 ZONES 12 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 YO TOTAL SPACES: LY 33 34 35 48 52 ZB Z7 61 YI 99 106 50 42 43 657 6:00 AN 30 AM 7:00 AM 1 6 9 9 2 Y 1 1 2 0 1 Y 8 7 0 44 30 AM 8:00 AN 7 Y3 Y1 32 9 3 Y 1 4 0 3 7 5 10 0 125 30 AN ' 9:00 AM I1 33 34 33 16 28 14 7 19 1 - 5 5 8 10 0 YY8 30 AN 10:00 AM IY 39 34 33 ZY Z9 16 14 Y2 6 9 8 4 IY 0 T58 30 AN 11:00 AM 11 9Y 94 9Y SB 97 ib 14 Y8 0 8 15 11 15 0 3~ pP.Qk 90 AM 12:00 BOON 9 28 29 Z7 17 91 l7 i6 17 9 8 6 18 10 0 248 30 PM 1:00 PM 10 31 3Z 30 Y6 33 16 18 14 5 7 8 11 i6 11 0 269 30 PN 2:00 PN 11 33 34 33 11 41 18 17 18 4 10 6 6 LO 10 2 265 30 PN 9:00 PN 1Z 99 94 9Z IL 9Y 15 17 19 B 9 7 11 14 lY 2 267 30 PN 4:00 PN 9 Y3 Z7 31 19 37 17 18 20 11 5 8 4 6 8 1 299 90 PN 5:00 PM 7 8 !0 12 lY 29 19 18 16 7 9 6 9 1 0 1 165 30 PN 6:00 PM 3 1 4 13 19 31 11 Yl 17 9 5 10 6 I1 1 165 30 PM 7:00 PM 30 PM 8:00 PN 30 PN 9:00 PM fl, D~~ j Jun 14 O1 03:59p ,~ Bustin-Foust Traffic OaTa Service, Inc. (714) 541-2228 PARKING STINIT LOCATION: VIRGINIA DARE CENTER HIIYEN & FOOTHILL DATE: s/oz/ol oar: sanROar TINE 20NES ' Perlod Begimiim~ 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 B 9 10 11 [7141 667-7952 CITr: RANC110 CUCAMON611 FILENAME: 051Y2P01 p.9 IOMES 1Z 13 14 15 16 17 1B 19 20 TOTAL SPACES: L2 33 34 35 49 52 Y8 Y7 fil 27 98 108 50 4Z 4J 657 6:00 AN 30 AN 7:OD AN 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 6 6 0 YO 30 AM 8:00 AN 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 7 8 10 11 1 53 30 All 9:00 AN 0 6 1 2 0 1 3 Y 5 1 5 18 18 10 11 Y 83 30 AN 10:00 AN 0 5 2 5 0 4 4 S 3 0 3 lY 18 15 16 0 93 Ppal( 30 AN 11:00 AN 0 4 2 3 0 8 12 Y 0 0 5 B 14 18 lY 0 B9 30 M 32:00 NOON 0 5 2 5 0 4 6 4 3 Y !0 8 15 10 11 0 83 30 PM 1:00 PM 0 5 3 5 0 6 8 3 4 Y 8 4 17 1S 9 0 67 SO PN 2:00 PM 1 5 2 4 0 Y 4 3 Y 3 8 4 8 10 B 0 61 30 PN 8:00 PN 0 5 2 3, 0 4 6. 3 4 4 8 9 10 8 6 0 N 30 PN 4:00 PN 0 8 Y 4 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 4 11 9 8 0 49 30 PM 5:00 PM 0 5 1 7 0 Y 0 5 0 0 6 1 9 7 0 0 43 30 PN 8:00 PM 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 4 1 0 4 1 10 8 0 0 36 30 PN ' 7:00 PM 30 PM 8:00 PM 30 PM 9:00 PM COMMENTS: u :.9 \\ Jun 14 O1 03:59p flustin-Foust (714] 667-7952 p.9 c. ~. Traffic Data Services, Inc. (714) 541-2228 PARKINfi STUDY LOCATION: VIRGINIA DARE CEBTER HAYEN b FOOTHILL GATE: 8/09/01 DAY: SATURDAY CITY: NANCIW CUCAININGII FILENAME: 0512PP05 TIME ZONES ~ ZONES A- Panod Be9lmm~g 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 8 8 10 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 ie 19 YO TOTAL SPACES: 12 s3 34 35 49 62 Y8 27 61 Y7 1 99 100 50 42 43 657 B:00 All ~ 30 AM 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 D I 2 ~ 0 10 6 7 0 sl 30 AM B:00 AN 0 5 0 2 1 1 3 0 Y I ~ 18 15 13 15 2 84 30 AM I 9:00 AN 0 5 0 Y 1 6 1 1 Y 4 " ~ 17 Yl 17 10 Y gg P~ 30 All I I 10:00 AM 0 5 0 3' 1 0 1~ 8 3 2 Sj 14 19 18 it Y 86 30 AM 11:00 AM 0 5 0 4 1 7 8 3 2 Y 4 18 12 }6 0 g9 sD AM 12:00 NOOM o 5 0 0 0 6 t o s Y I 2 14 is 11 0 ~ 30 PM 1:00 PN 1 5 1 1 0 6 1 1 3 3 Si 3 18 15 lY 0 76 30 PM { 2:00 PN 1 6 1 2 0 4 1 3 3 Y 6I 2 6 7 1P 0 58 90 PM 3:00 PN 1 6 1 Y 0 i Y Y 2 2 5 I 3 5 5 8 0 ~ 30 PM ~ 4:00 PN 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 1 2 3 3 1 7 1 5 0 95 30 PN 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 t Y 0 3 Y t 1 6 5 7 0 ~ 30 PN 6:00 PM 0 0 0 Y 0 3 2 3 Y 9 2 0 it 7 6 0 41 30 PN 7:00 PM SO PM 8:00 PN sb PM s:oD PM pia i . ~~- r~7• _.. Ill,llli~llll~,lli.,.lill'I'~~ I II I II I I I'I VIII I Ililll ~ ~ r.s.~wu Y ~ r ~ ,~' r M~~y 7 E- ~+i - I_ _ 1, •i ~ ~I [CV~11M - vfY IN Y• y '.., I ' I / . ~ . CPS ~ o~ ~ ~ 4 ~ $ o 00 ~ L' _4 ~~ ~ I ~~ _ ~ ~ ~..-.~ sz ~ .' ' •.~~ ri ' 'I 1: ~1. I SI G ~ ~' ' ~ / ~ v I`I _ i~ - 6 : ~ "' _ b/ /f fl_II III,- I' ~I •j -II i Inl li,il~l ~•il III I L I ~ e -I ~ "` CV„""""' ~, ~._ ~~ -~ .~ '.+,~rr ~.= in nILTII IP'1 I ! I I'I_L ^ mo. e:.: se „s„ := .:n«: ' ~ . ... I II ,~ .~ ~aa .~ I ~~ ~ j f f/~1 l~ ~~ Foar»ILL eu~n~ l~ _ ~d~ 1~I~'f~ie R~ fl~3 ~9 ~: 1'r . LN RESOLUTION N0. 85-112 ~J, ? ~ RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 85-22 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN ANO FOOTHILL IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 12th day of June, 1985, a complete application was filed by Edwards Cinema for design review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of July, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is~ in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts an the environment a~~at a Negative Declaration was issued on June 8, 1983. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 85-22 is approved subject to the follow ng con itions and attached Standard Conditions: Design Review 1. All pertinent conditions of CUP 83-07, as contained in Resolution 83-19, shall apply. 2. Construction shall include a parking lot with minimum of 455 parking spaces within 300 feet. ~~G~ ~~~, • 1. 3. office struciur=~ o~ ~~-••- shat I oe ~_~ _~ ~ ~- re uire more than 85 aryimodification to the Conditional Use specifically approved by permit for the site. At the tim~icantsshallf submittaudetaeled proposed to be developed, the app arking for analysis to determine if there ~s Thesustudy shall be parking and proposed uses. all then operating reviewed by the Planning Commission. if thenco the c Planning between the theater and other uses, licable Commission shall consider a modification to the aPP Conditional Use Permit to reduce the square footage of the unbuilt remaining office b imit~ the hours ofooperationnofrthe with the parking overlay, adequate cinema, or other appropriate means of assuring parking. This condition shall be incorporated rovideoNotice approved by the City Attorney to be recorded to P ro erty of Condition to prospective purchase ermit for the cinema.P prior to the issuance of a building P edestrian walkway the site, including q, p textured treatment shall be used in t e p acrossethe parkingblot,that runs through varieties 5. The arbors shall be planted with vines, and creep n9 shall be utilized against wall surfaces of vines or ivY throughout the project reminiscent of the original winery. 6, Adequate lighting shall be provided on all sides of building for the safety and security of theater patrons. 7, Proper crowd controllinesitotensuren th t theater patrons do provided for waiting not block access to adjacent buildings or conflict wit vehicular circulation. such as movie g, Grand openings and other special even s, royal of a Temporary Use premieres, shall require review and app permit by the Planning Division. 9. Trovhdeenaccesse/toanthe~satisfaction ofalthebeFoothilledfire District. Enain~ ~IVision: 1, All pertinent conditions of PM 8303 shall be -adhered to. 2 A lot line adjustment shall be recorded to eliminate the to the theater prior to line between the two par ermits~ntaining the issuance of building p D`S