Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002/04/24 - Agenda Packet U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "- - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY APRIL 24, 2002 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman McNiel _ Vice Chairman Maaas Corn Mannerino _ Com Stewart _ Com Tolstoy _ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 10, 2002 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following dems are public hearings ~n which concerned mdrvrduals may voice their oprmon of the related pro/ect Please wad to be recogn¢ed 6y the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opmrons shall 6e limded to 5 minutes per md~vidual for each project Please sign rn after speaking A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the land use district designation from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7 acres of land, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue mid- block between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street as Phase One of the General Plan consistency program - APN 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, and 35 This action wdl be forwarded to the City Council for final action and the date of the Public Hearing before City Council will be separately noticed B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 -LIFEWAY CHURCH -The phased development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5 03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado -APN 208-921-36 Related File Variance DRC2001-00444 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration C VARIANCE DRC2001-00444 -LIFEWAY CHURCH - A request to allow a 10-foot high parking lot retaining wall and a 15-foot high parking lot retaining wall, where a maximum 6-foot high wall is permitted, and increase building height to 45-feet, where 35-feet is the permitted maximum building height, for a proposed church in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado -APN 208-921-36 Related Fde Conditional Use Permd DRC2001-00439 D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15802 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DEPARTMENT - A request to subdivide 4 24 acres of land in the Estate Residential Distract (1 dwelling urnt per acre) into 4 parcels (3 parcels for single family residential development and 1 parcel to be dedicated for a fire station), located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5844 East Avenue -APN 225-122-63 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00065 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00066 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negatwe Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00065 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT - A request to construct a fire station on 1 08 acres of land located in the Estate Residential District (1 dwelling unit per acre), located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5844 East Avenue -APN 225-122-63 Related Files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15802, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00066 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This ~s fhe time and place for the general public to address the comm~ss~on Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment hme If dems go beyond that hme, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission n U C_~ n U Page 2 r1 LJ 1, Gad Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certdy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 18, 2002, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Ciwc Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Vicinity Map Planning Commission April 24, 2002 HILLSIDE BANYAN 19TH' BASE FOOTi- Z o z z ¢ _ i ~ m Q Y Z 2 = J U g ~ ~ W ~~ NILSON LEGEND * City Hall 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles N • T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A StaffReport DATE April 24, 2002 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRONk Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the land use district designation from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7 acres of land, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue mid-block between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street as Phase one of the General Plan Consistency Program - APN. 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, and 35 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A Requested Action. Amend the Land Use Map of the Etiwanda Specific Plan fora 7-acre site on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue roughly midway between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to be consistent with the General Plan. B. Surroundin g Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant land; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Vacant land, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan East - Multi-family housing under construction, Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Vacant land; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan C General Plan Desionations. Project Slte - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North = Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ESPA DCR2002-00231 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 24, 2002 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics The site is occupied by eight single-family homes bwlt well before the City's incorporation There are several Eucalyptus trees on-site that appear to be remnant windrows The site is relatively flat, sloping gently from the northwest to the southeast. ANALYSIS• A General: The amendment represents Phase one of the General Plan Consistency Program whereby various conflicts between General Plan Land Use designations and Development Districts/Speafic Plan designations will be resolved to ensure consistency wdh the General Plan as recently updated in October of 2001 In this case, the 7-acre site on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street has historically been designated as Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) by the General Plan but Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) by the Etiwanda Speafic Plan. This discrepancy was discovered during processing of the Etiwanda Apartment protect surrounding the 7-acre site to the north, west, and south The Low-Medwm Residential designation sits as an island surrounded by the higher density Medwm Residential designation The amendment would not only provide consistency with the General Plan, it also ensures greater land use cohesion and compatibility by eliminating the need for specialized buffering between areas of differing densr<ies. B Environmental Assessment• Staff completed Part I of the Initial Study and Part II of the Environmental Checklist. Considering this is a land use amendment only, without an assoaated physical development protect, and because of the relatively small size of the site (only 7 acres), and the nominal increase in the potential number of residences, no potential environmental impacts were found If the Planning Commission concurs then a recommendation for certification of a Negative Declaration by City Council would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Councl that Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2002-00231 be approved with issuance of a Negative Declaration through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BB.BLC•mlg Attachments Exhibit "A" - Land Use Map Exhibit "B" - Initial Study Draft Resolution Recommending Approval ~~ City Planner h~. ~ f _. L~ `} j i ' Y ~ ' - - .. -. 4y~ ~ a '~i ± t x ~i'a,~ .+ (t ~iyc.^.~.."kf; i v ~ ~ - n) Y' _..~.' ^ s ~ _ ~4~Y ~i ~_ .,: a~ a~~- ~~".'';~' ._..$: ".,~-=six. ~.ti~"~ ~a ~~-}~: _ ,~ . -.~~~x n~ rt - , _ ,. i t i-J,4'L iy'i*v ! 1 ,-. ~~P-E Li)+ '4,.j ~Fw, _ rt+. ~ f ~{.y p ~ ~J~j ~~' ~~ ~~ ' ' ~i ~[h~ i4 r 1i~~ ~ °~ i ~ t2 y s~,~ ~ / ',', .pia ~- :~ UDC t .2. Y Y ~~~t(' l.~ '~ iy'; _ •Yy~~)= _ ,Y vi.~ ~` ` %?. ~' y,Y~ ._ ~ ; ~'; ': t' I ..~ ~ 4 QZ c~ L M on N O 0 0 O I..L 5~ L V z J a m X W P ~, .; ~~ cal ma~eo ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) INCOMPLETE AppLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that R Is the responslblllry o1 the epplkard to ensure d~ tl~ appl~bon Is complete at the tlme of submldal,• Clp~ slat/ will not be ave0ehle M peAam watt regWred to provide misabp bdametlon. Application Numberfor the profed to whkri tlda form Pertains' Project ~ \,. ~ ~~ G:i ?~_~~'~-~¢a6R~A rltle: Name a address otProJed owner{s): Name 8 Address of develoPef orProJeot ~ ~ ~'~'«~~~~ sponsor. ~o~ C~1llr C~lV~t. Oaa~e i~Aalr~p Q1C6No~1l,IL C/L 91134 Goofed Persona 6~"~ ~~~ . Address: ~ ~u ~ .~("~_T7Q1~i 'Pt~.1r~lOv G~c~e-lbt r~ 9i~~ ~~~.. ~T ,~ Name & Address of person preparing this /orm (d ddlerent lrom above): Number. Information indicated by asterisk (ry rs not required o/non-ca~s(ruetion CUP-s unless otherwise requested by stall. 'i) Provide a toll scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whkh includes the pro)ect site, end brdicate 8re alts boundaries. 2J Prevlde a set of colorPhotogrephs whkh show representetrve views into the site hom the north, south, east end west views into and from the alts /rom the primary aooess points which serve the site; end representative views of signl8cant features hom tie stre. tnaudea.~m/ap snowrrrp bcanon o/each photograph. 3) ProJectLocation (describe): / 15/~?~. .t~Pti'K1~.tl~ 4~11d~ 8~ 'R~'-1taf.~1'tt7fl~llt~ P~t)tbd-a.D A.~..~ as+~~ bl~ - S.lY~2L g+OP GF ~1 r r~..10,-, bV ~.h~P 4) Assessor-s Parcel Numbers (ettaah addidbnal sheet H ' necessary): •~ Gross Site Area (adaq. 2): ~ Afi ~) Net Site Area (total site she minus eras of publk sheets d proposed dedica8ona): ~ ~~~ ~a~ POwGYY~P.f~ W1'11} '.pt.L+r1 dM!.a1~.IrF~ - ~ r 7)Desd(be any proposed general plan amendment orzorra change whkh would e0ect the pro)ed sRe (attach addlbonal street !/necessary.' . ~~ ~•, 8) lndude a description of ad pemrlts which xa7/ be rrecessa /rom the agenaes rn order to lu/ty rmp/emenf the prgecC ry ~' o/Rendro Cucamonga end otfrer governmental ~r1f.- ~ebh,uP~ ~F~x~ ~ ~j.~ .~.ia P a~.1_1r.1! ray„~µ1c,~,lonl 9)Describe tire physical salting ol(he site as ti exists before the projed Indudinglnlamafron on topography, soil staMiy, Plant and anrma/s mature trees, trar7s and raeds drsrnage carrses and scenic espeds. Desrnbe any existing stnndures on efts (rnduding age end caMlton) and the use ofthe sfrudures. Attach Photographs o/signlficarrtfeafures descritred. In edditlon, site all soun:es o/!n/onnabon ~.e., geologrcal and/orhydro/ogic studies, biotic and archeological surveys tretBc studies): -~+[~~X ~~' . -f~ov- AJ~~ ~ VA~sF..T-( of . ~ivfy~ ~'~~ y~ft~ -~~ Q~ C~~~i.~ xa a ~E,'~ ~ -rtasc~ vat ~~ N~a;~~~ ~ v~..,,~~ T ~'~_ - I.Sl~oat~ 1+PPP~_-~ t1c S~1 LF~- ~ tdoWd,lQ, - 10)Descnbe toe /mown cu/hrrel and/orhlstoricalsspects o/fhe alts. S/te apsources o/fnfwmatlon (boalq published reporGa and oral history): ~~ •~ 11)Descnbe any noise sources and Meer levels Mat now a/fect the site (alraafQ roadway noise, etc) and how they will aHeCt proposed uses: ~(' ~ +t~c ~ W~i~ C~ ~ Q ~~ DO tlr. 12)Describe the Proposed Pro/ect in detaA. This should provide an adequate description of Me site !n farms of ultimate use which will resuH from the proposed Pml~ Indicate H Mere are proposed phases for development the extent of development to aocur with each phase, and the anbapated completion o/each rncremenL Attach additional sheet(s) Hnecessary: CD~I 's~i..~ ~~ +rt. C~e~.lllc~ P L11i11 ~_-/-ear ~ ~ w \.. ~u,G_ ~ T1~ Ct+'11.~0iA' SPCC'''' ~/,~~~jf~31t51~1P.9~. • 13)Descdbe the sunounding Properties, brduding lnhrrmetlon on plants end animals end eny culdrral, hlstork:al, or scenic shops, deperhnent srores etcl J ~uscele of de~relopcommerd~ghttafrontags. setbe~ ar yard~ebc~h, of mrtrnent houses. 14) lMll Me proposed project change Me pattern, scale or character of the surrounding gerreral•erea of the proJet~'! i.. , _ .n i r2 ~.~2f~a~9t~ >L ~~ ~J~.-~G'1a MF.1k~t4AR~l~ "f - pp _ ~..,1_\AA •.1 ~. I, J!. to lilt. '! . 15)Indicate the type of short-term and bng-temr nose to be generated, rnduding source and amormt. How wm these noise levels atlect ediacent properties and onsde uses. What methods of sound proofing are proposed? -{'~¢.,PF lh -.1 ~ w~+{(-,ydr 16~~DGLAr~J~ I~tNt~ -Iti~i I~ACh.\m ~u11E.~1' x'1 2. ~lo~ ~eGbS~D r.3DtSL gGtyf~~i. •16) lndreate proposed removals and/orreplecements olmature orscenlc trees: 17) indicate any bodies d'water (uxaluding domestic wetersuppfies) GrM whkh the ells drains 18)lndreeteexpededamounto/waterusage. (SeeAkedunentA/orusageestanelea). For/uAherdartfieaUon,t~leasecorrtset the Cucamonga County WaterDlsMd at 887-2591. I a Resldenfial (galMay) b. Commerdal/lnd. (B~aY~c1 Peek use (gauDay) Peak use (galhNr/ec) 19)Indlcafe proposed method oJsewege d/epees/. Septlc Teak Sewer. Il septlc AanA~ ere propaaed, e~ percolation testa. Nd/scherge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected dally sewage generaEfon: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For furtlrer darrfica5on, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987- 2591. a. Residen0al(gatMaY) 1`~1 I /'~ b. CommerdaNnd. (ga~aYYac) RESIDENT/AL PROJECTS: 20J Numberol resldenbel units: " N I Datadred (indicate range o1 parcel sties, min/mum tit stze end mardmum tot sae: i ~8 Attached (rndia3te whetherunrts are rental orforsa/e unftsJ: 21)Anbapatedrangeo/salepdoesandrorrerrta: iII~ Sale Pace(s) S ~`1 to S Rent (permonth) S to S 22) Speaty number of bedroaas by un/t type: 23) Indiana entk/peted household ske by urdt ate: _ NIA 24)/ndiarte the expected number of sdrool children who will be res/ding within the pr%ct Confect the appropdete Scholl D~sbida as ahrnm in Attachment B: e. Elementery.~ b. JunlorHlgh: c SeniorHlgh ~I~ 25) Descdbe type of u sJ and msJor luncbon(s) oI axnmerdal, lndusbfal orlnstltuflonal uses: Total flooraree of axrrmerdal, indusbfe%~rlinsd'hrflonal uses by 4Pe: \ ':. 27) Indic~(e hours o/operation' 28) Numberol employees: 29)Provide breakdown of of hire for each dessM TotaL• Maxrmum Shalt Time o1 Mexhnum Shpt afed job dassiflcabons, induding wage and salary ranges, as well es en indication of the rate (attach additional street it necessary): 30) Estimebon of the numberol workers ro Mred that cunentiy realde>n tiro pb~' ~1)For rwmmerdel and Indusb(a/ uses anry; lndlca the source, type end amount of e/r pd/utkrn emiss<orra. (Data ahoukl be venfled through the South Coast A/rQuellty Man ment Dlstdrx at (818) 572203): ALl PROJECTS 32)HaYe the water, sewer, fire, end flood conbol agerroes serving the project been cantaded ro detemdne their ablliq~ to provide adequate serv/ce ro tira proposed prod? Ilso, please Jndreete tirelrresponae. NIA ~f~ Iri the known history of this property, has there been any use, skrage, or discharge o/hazardous and/or fox~c marenals7 33J~amp/es of hazardous and/or toxic materials mdude, but are not bmrted to PCBgs, radioactive substances, pesticides and her6iddes,• fuels, oils, solvents, and othertlammab/e liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please bet the materials and describe them use, skrage, and/or discharge on fhe property, as well as the dates of use, H known. ~i1t t1~NGld ~ICI~- p5~lfGL~~~ ~J L4Uis c~161,Xi PrG Doar te.W,~a ur r~or"1. 34) l~Yill fhe proposed pro%ct lnvohre the temporary orlong-term use, skrage or discharge of hazandous andror toxk marenals, mdudmg but not hmrted to those examples listed shovel H yes, provide an inventory of all such maredals re be used and proposed method of disposal, The kcabon o/such uses, along w/th the skrage end shipment areas aha0 be shown and labeled on the applrca(ron plans, ~~ • / hereby cerd/y that Obe statements famished above and M the attached exh/bks present Ghe date and lydomretkrn required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ebplty, that the /act& statements, and lnlormation presented are tore and correct tot he beef o/my knowledge and be/le% I Iurttrer understand that edd~bonat tn/ormation maybe regmred k be submlfted be%re an adequate eve/ua8on can be made by the db' 01 Rendro Cucamonga, Care: CZ s/gnatvre: ~ (dw7t' rise: ltG. 'ff1-d.~~et . ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Etiwanda Speafic Plan DRC2002-00231 2. Related Files: Tentatroe Tract Map No. 16257, Tree Removal Permit DRC2001-00567, Variance DRC2001-00566, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00557 (Etiwanda Apartments Proiect -Forecast Corporation). 3. Description of Project: A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan land use designation from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7 acres of land located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue mid-block between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street as phase one of the General Plan Consistency Program - APNs: 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, and 35. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Addn:ss: Crty of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling unts per acre) 6. Existing Zoning: Low-Medwm Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Etiwanda Specific Plan. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site contains 8 single-family detached homes and is surrounded by vacant land planned for the recently approved 368-urnt "Etiwanda Apartments° protect by Forecast Corporation. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Brent Le Count Assoaate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required. State Water Resources Control Board - General Construction Actroities Storm Water Runoff Permit. ~/~ i lJ Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, Involving at least one Impact that Is "Potentlally Significant Impact," °Potentlally Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or °Less Than Significant Impact" as Indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ()Land Use and Planning () Transportation/Ciroulahon ()Public Sernces ()Population and Housing ()Biological Resources () Utilities and Sernce Systems ()Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources ()Aesthetics ()Water ()Hazards ()Cultural Resources O Pur Quality O N°ise O Recreation Mandato Findin s of Sr nrficance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that the proposed pro)ect COULD NOT have a signrflcant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION well be prepared. SI ned: ~" " \ 9 Brent Le Count, AICP Associate Planner April 2, 2002 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the Calrfomia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation Is required for all 'Potentially Significant Impact,° °Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,' and °Less Than Sign'rficant Impact° answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the signrflcant effects identrfied. raeneeur s ~~ ie°a Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ ""°"i' omicem u"°ffi ~.Lnpaoon TMB° siWncem N° i I cetl i I 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? () () () (/) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (/) policies adopted by agencies with Jurisdiction over the proJect~ c) Be Incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (/) vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (/) established community? ~/3 Initial Study for DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Comments: a-d) The proposed amendment is necessary to make the Etiwanda Specific Plan consistent with the General Plan, which already designates the site as Medwm Residential All of the surrounding property is designated Medwm Residential and the sRe therefore appears as an island of Low-Medwm Residential. P«xNNy s~ ~~ ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources• s i ,,~~~, ~,'"'~,,,, ~ ,b 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (/) population protections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e.g., through protects in an undeveloped area or extension of mator infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/) housing? Comments• a-c) Redesignating the site to Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) from Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) will allow for potentially more occupants of a future protect but the increase is nominal (42 more indiwduals if developed at the absolute top of the density range). Furthermore the General Plan already designates the site as Medwm Residential. sewn ~~ ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~, i , s i ,~ 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result rn or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? () () () (/) b) Seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) c) Seismic ground failure, including Irquefaction~ () () () (/) d) Seiche hazards? () () () (/) e) Landslides or mudflows? O O O (/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable sod () () () (/) conditions from excavation, grading, or fdl~ g) Subsidence of the land? () () () (/) h) Expansive soils O O O (/) i) Urnque geologic or physical features? _ ~ () () /~7/ () (/) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation Page 4 Comments• a-b) No known faults pass through the srte, and it is not in an Earthquake Fautt Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga Crty Speaal Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fault. The Red Hill Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes wdhin 3 miles northwest of the srte, and the Cucamonga Fautt Zone lies approximately 4 8 miles north. The magnitude of the maximum probable event along these faults is estimated at moment magnitude (M,V) 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jaanto Fault, capable of produang up to M,,, 7.5 earthquakes is 9.0 miles northeast of the sde and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M,,, 8.2 earthquakes, is 11.5 miles northeast of the sde. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Cdy grading standards and the Unrform Bwlding Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signfficant. c) In the absence of shallow groundwater, the sde is not considered susceptible to sod liquefaction. d) The site is not located near a body of water; therefore, the proposed development will not expose people to a seiche hazard e) The srte is relatively flat, therefore, there is no danger of landslides or mudflows. Future grading to accommodate a protect will be mammal to even out the site and create the necessary slope gradient to allow proper site drainage. f-h) Sod type at the site and in the wcinity is Tutunga association (Tv6) The Tutunga series consists of somewhat excessively drained, nearly level to moderately sloping sods formed on alluvial fans in granitic alluvium. A sods report will be required poor to the issuance of budding permits. Standard grading practice includes watenng of exposed/graded surfaces to control dust The City's General Plan indicates that most soil types in the City are very adaptable to land development and are not of an expansive nature. i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features. ~ma.uy ~~ ,_. Issues and Supporting Information Sources' P°'°""°"Y ""'°n TM" s~vmrKam ruucnam s~wneam rw i ~ ~ i ~ 4. WATER. Will the proposal result ~n: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () () (~) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (~) hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (r) of surface water quality (e.g , temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (~) water body? ~~/ Irntial Study for DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 volenuely Sipruficant Inpect tags Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotantlBlly unless rnen . SlpNfiwlt Aetlpetlon SiPlilicenl No I Inca ae I I e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (r) of water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (r) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an agwfer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? () () () (~) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? () () () (r) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (~) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments• a) A Preliminary Drainage Study was prepared by Dan Guerra and Associates for the Etiwanda Apartments project surrounding the site to the north, south, and west. The sde drams southerly to Foothill Boulevard, through the Foothill Market Place, and ultimately to the Day Creek Channel. The City's Master Plan of Drainage proposed is to redirect this area easterly to the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Channel. Interim conditions do not allow additional flows to the faality until downstream regional faalities are completed. In addition, the property is not physically capable of draining to the basin. A Final Drainage Report prepared for Tract 15711 (located north of the project site) in September 1997, provides for the redirection of the undeveloped runoff from this area, with mitigation detention occurring in Basin No. 6 to account for this increased undeveloped flow. The report suggests on-site detention of the incremental developed runoff from this area to occur as a potential option. A final Drainage Study will be regwred with routine processing of future development project on the site. b) Based on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM, 1984) prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the project site is located within a °Flood Hazard Zone C.° This zone is defined by FEMA as an area of minimal flooding. c-e) Whether or not the proposed land use amendment is approved, future grading on-site to accommodate a project could exceed 5 acres, as the total site area is 7 acres This will regwre the applicant of such a future project to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for submittal to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A future project would also regwre a General Construction Activity Storm Water Runoff Permit from the SWRCB. Both the SWRCB and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will require the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) during construction to control the discharge of pollutants and sediments into streets and/or storm water conveyance channels BMPs would include, but are not limited to, street sweeping of paved roads during construction and the use of hay bales or sand bags to control erosion ~~7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation Page 6 during the rainy season A final Grading Plan will be prepared for any future protects on the site in accordance with City standards and show how storm water runoff will be handled both during construction and operation. Approval of Grading Plans and conditions applied to the protect by the Bwlding Offiaal to ensure adequate site drainage and adherence to BMPs identified in the SWPPP, wtll make this impact less than significant. f-i) The project will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area, as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. volerroelly 9o.tl0enl Illga less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~e~r ultlese nl.n apmn~enl I retlpeuan I siv+tlcanl No I 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standards or contribute to () () () (~) an existing or protected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? () () () (~) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (~) cause any change m climate? d) Create obtectionable odors? () () () (~) Comments• a-d) The proposed land use amendment does not include an associated construction protect. Development of the site in conformance with either the Low-Medium or Medwm Residential districts will require analysis to ensure compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District requirements. Since there is no physical protect associated with this request, no such analysis can yet be made. Furthermore, the site is relatively small, only 7 acres, and protects that can be accommodated on such a small site do not usually result in signficant air quality restrictions, alter air movement, or affect temperature. There are no known sensitive receptors in the vicinity, and development of the site with residential uses is unlikely to generate pollutants or obtectionable odors. volenwny 9pNtlrem Irlpea less Issues and Supporting Information Sources• Paeml.ly. &gnlficeM uNw AUtlpe0on men SIOn~tl0em NO 1 C Into e0 1 I 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? () () () (~) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., () () () (~) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (~) nearby uses? /~-~ 7 Irntial Study for DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Paenaeuy Sipufrcam i~ ~w Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Per spNrwn um.ss hwpenon rnd, saNn~m ra i i ~ i i d) Insuffiaent parking capacty on-site or off-site? () () () (~) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists () () () (~) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (~) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? () () () (~) Comments• a) Roadways that will be utilized by a future development on the site include Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The eight single-family residences on site generate minimal traffic. Existing intersections in the vicirnty of the site currently operate at Level of Service (LOS) D capacity or better. The site is so small that a future development protect would have traffic generation levels below the San Bernardino County Association of Governments threshold of 250 peak hour trips and therefore not regwre a Congestion Management Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (CMP/TIA). The applicant for a future development protect will be responsible for paying the City traffic impact fees and improwng the project's frontage along Etiwanda Boulevard. The applicant shall pay traffic impact fees that amount to the project's fair share of roadway improvements as identrfied by the City Engineer. b-f) There is no physical project proposed so it is impossible to analyze traffic circulation design, etc The site has approximately 500 feet of frontage on Etiwanda Avenue, which provides sufficient opporturnty for adequate street access. g) Located approximately 7 miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft rasrodry mo.p ~%+ Issues and Supporting Information Sources• dir SIG~mn ~ uN.m 16bpeam ,nom SloNfican~ No ~ 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result m impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (~) habitats (including, but not limited to• plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated speces (e.g., heritage trees, () () () (~) Eucalyptus windrow, etc )? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., () () () (~) Eucalyptus grove, Sage Scrub habitat, etc.)? ~~S Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation Page 8 Folen6elry 9prdficanL Issues and Supporting Information Sources P~~nanr ~ ~ ^~^ acran~arn Lma~n«~ sic~cem No I ecl Into Lad I I d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, npanan, and () () () (~) vernal pool) e) Wildlrfe dispersal or migration corndors? () () () (~) Comments• a) The site and surrounding area is NOT within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the U S. Fish and Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997. The site contains 8 residential units. The srie is mostly vegetated with non-native grasses and eucalyptus trees. Past agricultural and residential development has eliminated native vegetation at this site b-c) The sfte contains several mature Eucalyptus trees that would need to be removed to accommodate future development of the site. However, this would be necessary whether the site remains in the current Low-Medium Residential district or is changed to the Medium Residential. In any case, no development project is associated with this amendment, and therefore there is no impact. d) There is no npanan or wetland habitat on-site. e) The I-15 Freeway borders the site along the west and northwest. The site falls within an area of town that is rapidly being developed with new apartments and single-family homes. This development has eliminated any wildlife corndors that may have occurred in the past. ~~, soNr~wn InpxY Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Po9BAde"Y c"°° T^^^ 9pNMCen1 Mpopatlan SlpMficaM No 1 hwo ad I I 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal. a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (~) plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (~) ineffiaent manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (~) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Comments• a-b) Any future prolect on the site will be regwred to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation ~i9 Initial Study for DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 c) The site is located on the Day Creek alluvial fan, an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2). An MRZ-2 Zone contains deposits of known value and marketability. However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization. Polentlally s~irwam 1~ ~ Information Sources: Issues and Su ortin ~ c^'~ '^'^ pp g 51oNrcem eunyanm sla+ficam No I IrCO tetl 1 I 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A nsk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (~) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference wdh an Emergency () () () (~) Response Plan or Emergency Evacuation Plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (~) health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (~) potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (~) brush, grass, or trees? Comments• a-e) There is no evidence of commercial or industrial uses. No evidence of discarded drums, containers, or hazardous wastes were observed during a site visit. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. Past and current uses at and near the site include vineyard and residential development Demolition of residential structures to accommodate a future protect will be done in accordance with applicable Crty regulations. There is no actual development proposal associated with this amendment; however, changing the district from Low-Medium Residential to Medium Residential will not increase potential health hazards, fire hazards, or cause exposure of people to health hazards. rol«mwr 9,IYMSll1 ~ ~ Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~antle°~' SiprYfram u~ A4tlpetlan '"°^ Si0~1 No I Into b 1 1 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result ~n: a) Increases in existing noise levels? O O O (~) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? () () () (~) Comments• a-b) There is no development protect associated with this amendment that would increase existing noise levels or expose people to severe noise levels Development of a future protect on site would generate construction noise and ~~~ Irntial Study for DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 expose people to traffic noise from Etiwanda Avenue and the I-15 Freeway, but this would be the case regardless of whether the site were developed under the Low- Medwm or Medwm Residential distracts PaNeimmry SlpMicant irtprl Lase Issues and Supporting Information Sources' ~,~~~,'„ ~ ,~~, s,~ No ~rtoan imw i~ ~ncx+ 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? O O O (~) b) Police protection? () () () (~) c) Schools? () () () (~) d) Maintenance of public faalities, including roads? () () () (~) e) Other governmental services? () () () (~) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The site is located immediately west of Etiwanda Avenue and approximately 1,000 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, and is served by the Foothill Fire Protection Distract The nearest fire station is located on Base Line Road, west of Day Creek Boulevard, and approximately 2 miles northwest of the site. The Foothill Fire Distract is responsible for evaluating any future projects on the site through the City's Development Review and Growth Management process. Police Protection -Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriff's Department. Residential development is routinely regwred to include standard security devices, such as street lighting and locks on all windows and doors. Schools -The Etiwanda School Distract and the Chaffey Joint High School Distract serve the area. A standard Condition of Approval on future development projects will regwre the payment of school impact fees Parks -The slight increase in potential population associated with the proposed amendment (42 more people if developed at maximum density) will have nominal affect on parks and any impact will be mitigated by payment of park fees at the established rate. Public Facilities -The site is so small that future residential development would not significantly increase traffic on adjacent streets. The proposed amendment makes the Etiwanda Specific Plan consistent with the General Plan, which already designates the site as Medwm Residential. Any future development would be regwred to construct all necessary street improvements and pay traffic impact fees as established by the City Counal to offset the incremental increase in traffic. ~-a ~ Initial Study for DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Potenbalty 9pYfiteM Irrpacl Lms Issues and Supporting Information Sources vrnemielir voles, rn~ . SlpMecenl MlHpetlan SIpnlRCent No 1 Imam t~ t 1 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposa/ result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utd~ties: a) Power or natural gas? () () () (r) b) Communication systems () () () (r) c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (~) facilities d) Sewer or septic tanks? () () () (r) e) Storm water drainage? () () () (~) f) Sohd waste disposal? O O O (~) g) Local or regional water supplies? () () () (~) Comments: a-g) The land area of the site is so small that the increase in allowable density anticipated by the proposed amendment will have a negligible impact on utilities and services. Any future development will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area. Utility systems installed to service existing development within the area, are adequate and will not require major modrfications or alterations Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. t~.~, aWt~am Inpetl i.n Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paeeu.ly u"~+ T^'^ SlpnlflCeM Mlepeean 9pYeeern I No 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposa/.• a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? () () () (~) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? () () () (~) c) Create light or glare? () () () (~) Comments: a-c) The project site is not within a scenic vista or scenic highway. Future development projects will be required to undergo the City's Development Review process, which includes exhausting design review of building design, grading, and landscaping to ensure quality aesthetics Any development project will increase light and glare as new lighting will be necessary, but the increase due to the proposed amendment would be nominal. i ~~a Initial Study for DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 vm~n~lly Sipnifiwlt Inpecl Lase Issues and Supporting Information Sources vm«~ndir umw ,nom . SlpNliwit MNpsnan Slgnfioam No I I t~ I I 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal. a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? c) Affect historical or cultural resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, which would affect unique ethrnc cultural values? O O O (~) O O O (~) O O O (~) U O O (~) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (~) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The site has not been identified in the City's Master Environmental Assessment as containing historic or cultural resources. The site is located m a developing residential area and to date, no resources have been uncovered m the viamty of the project site. va~,naoY so+n~l Inpscl l w Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ~ ~ ~ u^Iw T"^^ .. .Jp~..~ 9PIIAwn FStlpetlan SluNfiunl No I Ineo I I 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (~) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opporturnties? () () () (~) Comments: a-b) The subject amendment would result m a maximum of 42 more dwelling units than could currently be developed. The City's park fees are based upon which residential district a site falls within, so any future development would be subject to appropriate fees for the Medium Residential District. Surrounding and adjacent land are also designated residential or commercial and are either currently developed, being developed, or proposed for development. ~~3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation Page 13 rol~nmlly SipnlOCant Ir,gect Lw ortin Information Sources es and Su I ~««mwr unlms n,.n pp g ssu pNAeanl ELOgNan 9pniMe°m No I Into ed 1 I 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS O~ SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have () () () (~) the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential () () () (~) to achieve short-tens, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one, which occurs, in a relatively beef, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts () () () (~) that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (°Cumulatively considerable° means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have () () () (~) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments• a-d) The amendment does not have a physical project associated with it, so assessment of all potential impacts cannot be undertaken until a project is proposed. The amendment is necessary to make the Etiwanda Specific Plan consistent with the General Plan, which already designates the site as Medium Residential. The site is relatively small, only 7 acres, so the increase in households that would result in re-districting the site from Low-Medium to Medium residential would be nominal. For the most part, impacts associated with development of the site under Medium Residential requirements are indistinguishable from that associated with development of the site under Low-Medium Residential requirements. The amendment will foster compatibility of land uses, as the site is an island of Low- Medium Residential surrounded by Medwm R(,(esidential. f~ 4'i / Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2002-00231 -Forecast Corporation Page 14 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analyses. The following earlier analyses were utilized m completing this Initial Study and are available for review m the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, located at 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve (check all that apply): • Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (Certified 1983) • Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (October 2001) • Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (Adopted December 7, 1983, rewsed June 1999) • United States Fish and Wildlife, Final Recovery Plan for the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly, Figure 6, September 14, 1997. • Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update EIR (Adopted October 2001, State Cleannghouse No. 2000061027) ~. o~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Prolect File No.: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRAC2002-00231 Public Review Period Closes: April 24, 2002 Prolect Name: Project Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga Prolect Location (also see attached map)• Located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue mid-block between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street - APN 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, and 35 Prolect Description: A request to amend the land use district designation from Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7 acres of land as Phase One of the General Plan consistency program FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the envvonment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ® The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ~ The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the envronment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of Determination Adopted By ~~ RESOLUTION NO 02-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVALOF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE MID-BLOCK BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET AS PHASE ONE OF THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY PROGRAM AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 227-211-12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, AND 35 A Rentals 1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Etiwanda Speafic Plan Amendment No DRC2002-00231 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 24th day of April 2002 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occun'ed B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidenn: presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on April 24, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spenfically finds as follows The application applies to property located within the Gty, and The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenn;d public heanng and upon the spenfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a This amendment is necessary to resolve conflict with the Land Use Polines of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and b This amendment promotes the goals and ob~ectrves of the Development Code and Etiwanda Spenfic Plan, and ~a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-42 ESPA DRC2002-00231- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Apnl 24, 2002 Page 2 c The proposed amendment wdl not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the wGnity, and d The subject application ~s consistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Speafic Plan, and e The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project vwll have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Negative Decaration, based upon the findings as follows. a That the Negative Decaration has been prepared in compliance vnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reFlect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration vnth regard to the application b That no significant adverse environmental effects will occur ~~..I c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Calrfomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect wdl have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which Hnldlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etnvanda Specific Plan Amendment No DRC2002-00231 by the adoption of the attached City CounGl Ordinance 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Maaas, Vice Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary ~~O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-42 ESPA DRC2002-00231- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Apnl 24, 2002 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24"' day of Apnl 2002 by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~a9 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2002-00231 TO AMEND THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE MID-BLOCK BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH STREET AS PHASE ONE OF THE GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY PROGRAM AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 227-211-12,13, 17, 18, 22, 23, 32, 33, 34, AND 35 A Recitals 1 In October of 2001, the City Counal adopted the 2001 General Plan Update, and recognizing that there are vanous areas within the City that have development distncts that differ from the land use distncts of the General Plan, a General Plan Consistency Program was established 2 On Apnl 24, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and recommended approval 3 On ,the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application 4 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred B Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Counal hereby speafia311y finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Counal dunng the above- referenced public heanng on ,including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located within the City, and per acre) b The proposed amendment wdl not have a signifia3nt impact on the environment c The surrounding land area is designated Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units d This amendment is necessary to establish consistency with the Land Use Polices and Designations of the General Plan and wdl provide for development within the distnct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and e This amendment promotes the goals and obtectives of the Land Use Element, and X30 ORDINANCE NO ESPA DRC2002-00231 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .... Page 2 f This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Councl hereby finds and concludes as follows. a The subject property ~s suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area The 7-acre site is surrounded by Medwm Residential Land Use designation and the surrounding property has been approved for an apartment project in the same district; and b The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The General Plan currently designates the site as Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) so the amendment will make the Etiwanda Specific Plan consistent with the General Plan; and c The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council fords that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. That no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council dunng the public heanng, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2002-00231, a request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 7 acres of land located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, mid-block between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street from Low-Medwm Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as shown in the Exhibit "A " 6 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance ~3/ X I ~~ . ~ . a ~ '~°~ ' . ~ + ' z a MU •" ' LAND USE MAP ~"`~~k~r,tt „n;,M..A,""•+ ;a a~.YY. i,'F~Y t ,y• •~ `1 RRC , Y ` ~ - a, ~'ne~_i' x ^^r~••tJ k~.Y tea. ~: e . ~, +. ^.e ~ r ,-i y+ a : -3i } -' • ~ - ", ~ r ~ ~ y ~ ~ ' ~+ Y , i ~~~t, !- '. ~ ~A,+S ,.~'~.A~ f~+:i'i "V J '' " ' Final: » il ~ .,r ~, ~ ~ ~~ 1isee p ` ~ ft 0 ijS'. ,NS4~ S.+.n, ~t M > I ,' i .jr~ G X >. ` + j 3 ,~ ^ a ~ , x°` *"•`'~ ~ ~ '~"i '~, i' n•A, ~z, .t~,,t '~ y ~•;n~" , a k« ~ v ,~ I~r~iel L ~ , t ` _ . i ' b .n ~ t s r_ ~ , k, Y n ~ ~ ~ L I~ ~ ~~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~1 ~y ~ % q:,r ~"'~ i~ T t ti ` t ,x ~i4~'` ` I I 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Mdes L.1 ~N R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE• April 24, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Kart A Coury, Assoaate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 -LIFEWAY CHURCH -The phased development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational faalities, a gymnaswm, administrative offices, and storage on 5 03 acres of land in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN 208-921-36 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration VARIANCE DRC2001-00444 -LIFEWAY CHURCH - A request to allow a 10-foot high parking lot retaining wall and a 15-foot high parking lot retaining wall, where a maximum 6-foot high wall is permitted, and increase building height to 45 feet, where 35 feet is the permitted maximum building height, for a proposed church in the Low Residential Distract (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN 20&921-36 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Single-family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) South - Single-family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-family Residential, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling urnts per acre) West - Open Space, Red Hill Park B General Plan Desionations North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Park ITEMS B & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00439 and DRC2001-00444 - LIFEWAY CHURCH April 24, 2002 Page 2 C Site Charactenstics• The site is located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado, across the street from Red Hill Park (Exhibit "A") The site is undeveloped, with a substantial slope from west to east, and is covered with grasses with no mature trees Single-family dwellings surround the property on the north and south Immediately east of the site is vacant land Access to the site will be through proposed drive approaches on Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado D Parkino Calculations The parking regwrement for the church is based on 1 space regwred for each 4 fixed seats within the main auditorium (18 linear inches of bench shall be considered a fixed seat) Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footaoe Ratio Reowred Provided Church/Sanctuary 13,985 1 space per 4 140 234 (557 fixed seats) fixed seats Total 140 234 Church hours and office hours of operation are proposed as follows Sunday 7.30 a m to 12 30 p m Monday through Friday 6 30 a m to 6 30 p m. ANALYSIS: A General The protect consists of a Master Plan of 41,300 square feet of bwldmg area with sanctuary, storage, educational facilities, an office area, a fellowship hall, and a gymnaswm The buldings will be built on the 5 03 acres of land (Exhibit "B"). The buildings will be self suffiaent with independent access, parking, and utility services Finish materials for the proposed bwldmg exterior include plaster texture, aluminum storefront Hnndows, stained glass treatment, and a concrete tle roof (Exhibit "C") The applicant proposes to develop the property in four phases (Exhibit "D") The first phase wll include a sanctuary and office bwldmg fronting Vineyard Avenue and a parking lot on the east end of the site Phase 1 is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2002 Bwlding design approval is only being requested for Phase 1, with the remaining phases being master planned in terms of bwldmg, parkng, and access locations Phase 2 wll include the construction of a 2-story education bwldmg along Calle del Prado behind the sanctuary to be completed by 2006 Phase 3 wll include the construction of a fellowship hall behind the office bwldmg toward the south side of the site proposed to be completed by 2008 Phase 4 will consist of a gymnaswm to the east of Phase 3 after 2010 ^g~ c a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00439 and DRC2001-00444 - LIFEWAY CHURCH April 24, 2002 Page 3 B Desion Review Committee The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the project at their March 5 and 19, and April 2, 2002, meetings (Exhibit "I") The Committee recommended approval of the protect with conditions. C Grading and Technical Committees. The Grading Committee reviewed the project on March 5, and April 2, 2002 The Technical Committee reviewed the project on March 5, 2002 Both Committees recommended approval with conditions D Neiohborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on March 14, 2002 Five people attended the meeting, which included property owners from the surrounding residences to the north and south of the subject site The residents asked questions regarding street improvements to the north and the easterly parking lot walls and noise E Environmental Assessment Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant. Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study (Exhibit "J") and the Environmental Checklist Staff determined that the protect could have a sigmficant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality and noise during site preparation, such as dust caused by grading and equipment noise Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short-term air quality and noise impacts to a less than significant impact If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order VARIANCE ANALYSIS A Bwidina Height Icrease• The applicant is proposing to increase the maximum bwlding height from 30 feet to 45 feet Because of the sigmficant grade assocated with the property, the protect is subject to Hillside Development Regulations A variance is required to increase and encroach into the maximum building height by 15 feet The intent of the Hillside Development Regulations is to minimize adverse effects of grading while allowing for reasonable development of land In order to integrate the building to the surroundings, the applicant has proposed a terraced site design The bwlding will be suffiaently set back from property lines and curb face of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado to eliminate impacts to adjacent properties Granting of the variance for the increased height of the structure will result in a portion of the sanctuary roof element approximately 10 feet greater in height than the surrounding single-family residences The increased height element only applies to the northwest comer of the sanctuary roof, with the remainder of the building compliant with the Hillside Development Regulations In addition, the proposed roof pitch and style are characteristic with that associated with a church/sanctuary The increased building height is necessary to accommodate proper interior dimensions for the sanctuary for aesthetic and acoustical purposes Further, the topography of the site is such that it slopes 25 feet from the north property line to the south property boundary The sanctuary is located in the downhill (i a ,lower) portion of the site Because of the unique topographic setting of the site and proposed building setbacks, the variance for budding height will not result in a negative aesthetic impact on the surrounding neighborhood B Increased Wall Heioht The applicant is proposing to construct parking lot retaining walls up to a maximum of 15 feet The Development Code allows a maximum 6-foot wall for residential districts The retaining walls are necessary to accommodate development of ~c 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2001-00439 and DRC2001-00444 - LIFEWAY CHURCH Apnl 24, 2002 Page 4 the parking lot at the eastern portion of the site, away from Vineyard Avenue The northernmost wall has a height varying from less than 1 foot at its western end to 10 feet high at the east end The second retaining wall at the center of the parking lot has a height varying from less than 1 foot at its eastern end to 15 feet at its west end (Exhibit "H") Both of these retaining walls are curb height from the north with the wall exposed to the south Because of the fall of the site, which continues south of the parking lot an additional 15 feet before reaching the property line, the height difference from the adjacent properties is as much as 40 feet As such, the retaining walls are not visible from the south Design and height of the wall will be further visually mitigated through decorative plaster, plasters, and landscape treatment C. Staff Conclusion Based on the above analysis, staff believes that there are sufficient facts to support the findings of the requested Vanance The site's topography is such that it slopes 55 feet from the northeast comer down toward the southwest comer, and 25 feet from the north property line to the south property line Exposure of the site to excessive topography constitutes an exceptional circumstance, as the vast ma~onty of land within the Low Residential Distnct is not exposed to such excessive topography CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Daly Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mated to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 and Variance DRC2001-00444 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB KC/~c Attachments• Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" -Location Map - Site Plan -Elevations -Master Plan/Phasing Plan - Conceptual Grading Plan -Floor Plans Exhibit "G" -Landscape Plan Exhibit "H" -Fence and Wall Elevations Exhibit "I" -Design Review Committee Minutes dated March 5, and 19, and Apnl 2, 2002 Exhibit "J" - Irntial Study Draft Resolution of Approval wlh Conditions for Conditional Use Pemtl DRC2001-004.49 Draft Resolution of Approval wrth Conditions for Vanance DRC2001-00444 ~-c y LIFEWAY CHURCH D. Location Ma P ?~ ~~ 0 Red Hdl Park DRC2001-00439 N DRC2001-00444 0 480 960 Feet ~J L~~~1 L ~ ~, ~ I I i , I ~ I j ~------ -----~ U ~-----~ I -fJ ~;ar I ~-~ ~"i ~+,"-~ CALLE DEL PRADO ^_;'~•Pr _ __- -_ _ _-_-_-_-_-_ _ 99_ xev3nevlnn_ _-_- - aarlrc vl le 19•'- S I 1 ;tip ------- i ~~ :e91 g.~ Z _ ~- ~ W LW W 4 ~~~ ~ L 111.'L6t1'F^ I I ~ ~ ~> ~ ~I _ I IQ I cwcvw. r ~ 1 I I ~ I i w L ~.Irrs I I .., .° .W}°I I \ I n ~ IQ I ~ ~~ IW I I , z I 1 I> ~" I ~iil'~c ~axsex I c } I - I - I II 19 1 1 I I I r`--------- I I L_L~ O ~~ o ~~ i ~ ~~ a _________________ _ 6 _ _________________ __ ____ ~~ QaC~C~~1~~~ ANEW CHURCH COMPLEX CUP SUBMITTAL LIFEWAY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DETAILED SITE PLAN 1 "=30'-0" N MARCH 2002 smswrclr°^ i WLC a.til l.a.lll lr:: <.111.1.1. 11111'11,1 111 111 11 11111 1.• 1111111111 c=- VVt51 tLEVATION NORTH Vl/3TER COICAt ELEVATION ^ M4}ERC0.di2 9T.~O(BRIIFVENEER LglLREfE THE ROOF ANEW CHURCH COMPLEX CUP SUBMITTAL LIFEWAY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA SCHEMATIC EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS vs•=~'-o• MARCH 2002 WLC iii}i i::;; in ii(i o:m:,a °i~iu ir~~ i nr nr em . wmme SOUTH PLAZA ELEVATION 00 NORTH PLAZA ELEVATION ~~~ BTIiCK BTOIE VEI&ER LORCIIETE ThE ROOF ANEW CHURCH COMPLEX CUP SUBMITTAL LIFEWAY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SCHEMATIC EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2 1 ~OR- 1 ~_OR MARCH 2002 WLC ..:: .,..... .....,. i i ~~~, ~ i ~ I~ I~ ~I j i i ~____-- l U U U~J U ~-----~ i U__~ ~ CALLE DEL PRADOJ - - - _ - - -+_ ~-r---------------------------- I r„v,.m..,~,.u=.,a I I ~~ ~ i~ ~ ~~ ANEW CHURCH COMPLEX C U.P SUBMITTAL LIFEWAY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGq cauFORNu PHASING PLAN 1 "=30'-0" N MARCH 2002 WLC ~~``E6 9re _ ~ 3 i7 C + N . °Q ~~ ~i I ~ ~~ e r A CC I] ., E.. ® ~ moron ~ xa~mxA uva~ unn m.r w m.+ v..vvom vas 3~-c ~~ ! !~ ~ ~ ANEW CHURCH ~' COMPLEX PHASE 1 LIFEWAY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA SCHEMATIC FIRST FLOOR n,..,. ~ ~,~, PLAN wa... n. .~, .a , c wo ~ Ks.u ~, m.mc mo. .~~, +m ~~ - -- Y imtY ~ ~ u. ' 0~5 1020 30 M1 .w I d d svu rwrx cawai Z MARCH 2002 WLC ~e~ ne nu A NEW CHURCH COMPLEX PHASE 1 V- ^~ \e ~~ T ~.omw mi ~ .'"od~P .~~ ora I ~.~ rsl .m~.rsl on"'v LIFEWAY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SCHEMATIC SECOND FLOOR PLAN 0~5 10~PO 30I R I d t~ z~ MARCH 2002 WLC ..a': tt,;:r,rlr.: ~r;:a: Ir~s•r.tl wws..®o Waw do ~ l ~ ° ~~~~ .,..,,~ aaoaosm aura usr crrr rwe rm m~o~uoe a sve mw on.un rxerem uv w«n~<va~~ .mcmm.rrw~.. rv e.v re w...:ti.. meow m.row~n~ no.moe.eou rv ~~ ~rna.acra rwat.mmoe, were ra rmrm riveuun..w oe® n.evew retie cure .oe wr~u era~ram aem Aevx m+e.~re mar ~c.uemr..oo.»e..o mane rman m..ronar sv~mviacws .m.m.ro.m.m..m mm ~ m. swat roc nanuae ~ r r.av. ee.ru »m noracr®e e®o. ~.. ~eom r~mniuur ran~owarr~ °••ivee re.uor sm ~~~ ao, ffio< .m~a.~e.~ ,,,e.~,,,,me® n...inee Meme..~mo... mom,. w,. w~e ~m.e~ .are ee.~ ~~ ~ ~..~.~.. wrewmrmia.eaor _~ a ~e~ K.r~..re~. ,.~ Wo< _ m.onm®.r+wao mr reee iwra rm no~ac wiemv .,~.~~ A NEW CHURCH COMPLEX CUP. SUBMITTAL LIFEWAY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONO/~ CALIFORNIA ~ ~ I~~~~ SITE PLAN lnreveeea [talm crwp .t~'~_. N OCTOBER 2001 WLC iii5~e'n.r.ni i17I . 7'•0:1::;9: 8 - 0' n --- _ ANEW _ ^ °`""E"`°`°"' CHURCH ^ ~~~ COMPLEX 1 eT„acemrh vEMEm CUP SUBMITTAL - 116E STEEL g ~ ~~ LIFEWAY CHURCH ,~ C~Si MET/iL MD YUNENI PUW ~S''S. RANCHO CUCA . MONOq CALIFORNIA ELCOME TO ----- -- --- _ IFEWAY CHURCH SCHEMATIC "°T~~~° `"° FENCE AND WALL ELEVATIONS TUBE STEEL FENCE, GATE SIM. +t+'.o• MONUMENT SI GN AT WEST ELEVATION Tat+•.o• '~' {~ NORTH PARKING LOT RETAINING WALL ~r=+•~• MARCH 2002 WLC '' :;.~~, I: ,:~::~;;;; ; SOUTH PARKING E~l I~i~NG~~A~L ,S"'7 ,s''t .~'~~ ,s-~, <-~,., "'r°''°' , ~ :;~i~;;;;;;;; ^ ^ "'~'°"°`°"' °~^~«~~ ercKSror~ve,Em ANEW CHURCH COMPLEX C U.P. SUBMITTAL ~~ ~~~^°°~ LIFEWAY CHURCH RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA STER PILASTER 1 OC ~~ SCHEMATIC WALL ELEVATION f ENLARGED NORTH PARKING LOT RETAINING WALL ,a•=,•.o• ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ MARCH 2002 W LC NORTH PARKING LOT RETAINING WALL ~,Z~+•-0. 2 `:""~"""'°•ai' DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Kart Coury March 5, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAYCHURCH -The development of a new church facility of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational facilities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN: 208-921-36. Related files: DRC2001-00444. Design Parameters: The site is located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado, across the street from Red Hill Park. The site is undeveloped with a substantial slope from west to east. The soil is undeveloped, covered with grasses, and with no mature trees. Single- familydwellings sun-ound the property on the north and south. Immediately east of the sde is vacant land. Access to the site will be through proposed drive approaches on Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado. The project consists of a master plan of 41,300 square feet of building area wdh sanctuary, storage, educational facilities, an office area, a fellowship hall, and a gymnasium. The buildings will be built on the 5.03 acres of land. The buildings will be self sufficient with independent access, parking and utility sernces. Finish materials for the proposed bwlding extenor include pilastertexture,aluminum storefront windows, stained glass treatment, and a concrete file roof. The applicant proposes to develop the properly in four phases. The first phase will include a sanctuary and office building fronting Vineyard Avenue and a parking lot on the east end of the site. Phase One is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2002. Budding design approval is only being requested for Phase One, with the remainder phases only being master planned in terms of building, parking, and axess locations. Phase Two will consist of the construction of atwo-story education budding along Calle del Prado behind the sanctuary to be completed by 2006. Phase Three will include the construction of a fellowship hall behind the office budding toward the south side of the site proposed to be completed by 2008. Phase Four will consist of a gymnasium to the east of Phase three after 2010. Stall Comments• The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: The 45-foot Sanctuary Budding Height -Reduce budding height to comply with the 30-foot maximum budding envelope of the Hillside Development Ordinance; therefore, a Variance application was submitted. Staff does not support such a Variance. All buildings are subject to the 30-foot maximum budding envelope of the Hillside Development Ordinance and maximum height of the subject zone. The height is particularly troublesome because this portion of the budding faces directly at the single-famiy residences on Calle Del Prado. 2 Architectural Style -The proposed architectural style is not compatible with, or sensitive to the ranch style' surrounding single-family residential neighborhood. In particular, the large, flat wall planes and flat parapet Imes would create too abrupt of a change in the neighborhood. The Development Code states, "a recognizable design theme shall be established, which is compatible with surrounding development. Subtle vanations are encouraged, which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt changes causing discord in the overall character of the immediate neighborhood It is not intended that one style of architecture should be dominant but that individual structures shall create and enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance The Code further states 'the architecture should consider compatibility with surrounding character, including harmonious \l ~ a bwlding style, fomt, size, color, matenal, and roofline " The Code also states, 'provide roof lines which respond to the general design of other roofs along the street.' ~~C ~~D i DRC COMMENTS DRC2001-00439-LIFEWAYCHURCH Maroh 5, 2002 Page 2 3. Provide more enhancements of north and east elevations of sanctuary including but not limited to, greater use of tle roof forms and additional building matenals. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the folowing secondary design issues: 1. Incorporate 30-inch by 30-inch pilasters into tubular steel fence consistent with materials used on the walls and buildings. 2. Proposed parking lot retaining walls shall be constructed with decorative materials. 3. Landscape berming, decorative low walls, shrub hedges, or combination thereof, shall be provided to screen parking areas from view of Vineyard Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the project and return for further Design Committee review. Design Review Committee Action: . Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner. Kart Coury The Committee directed the applicant to add the following: 1. The Committee supported the requested 45-foot building height variance and stated that it would be acceptable based on the reason that the increase height would only apply to a small portion of the building (at the northwest comer), and the angle of the roof would be charactenstic with that of a church. 2. The Committee identified that the proposed architectural style of the church may not be consistent with the surrounding single-family neighbofiood, but felt fiat added stacked stone elements, variation of the roof file cobr, additional landscaping, and modification of the building colors would soften the appearance of the building and make it more compatible to the immediate area. 3. Incorporate a second building material such as bock or cultured stone to add warmth to the proposed buildings. 4. Darken the proposed roof tie color (at a minimum a shade darker in brown, rather than the proposed reddish/orenge color). 5. Increase the proposed reveal expansions on building face to minimum of 3 to 4 inches. 6. Incorporate 30-inch by 30-inch pilasters into tubular steel fence consistent with materials used on the walls and buildings. 7. Proposed parking lot retaining walls shall be constructed with decorative materials. Incorporate mural type theme on the large wall face surface, particularly at the courtyard plaza area. ~-G1~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.00 p m Kart Coury March 19, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439-LIFEWAY CHURCH -The development of a new church faality of approximately41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational factliUes, a gymnasium, admirnstrative offices, and storage on 5 03 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2 to 4 dwelling units per acres) located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado-APN 208-921-36 Related Files• DRC2001-00444. PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Kart Coury The Committee reviewed the revised plans at the meeting and recommended the applicant add the following design items and submit revsed plans for review at the next meeting under Consent Calendar review 1 Modify the east parking lot to add more landscape planter islands and/orwiden the concrete finger islands to allow landscape area 2 Provide additional landscaping (trees and shrubs) along the south property line between the proposed dnve approach and the identified single-faintly residences 3 Add stacked stone treatment to the center of the proposed cross tower element 4 Add stacked stone pilasters to the bottom portion of the parking lot retaining walls, and maintain a constant vertical height for the stucco portion 5 Complete full width street improvement along Calle del Prado at the time of the phased development for the gymnasium or the classroom 6 Future development should include the use of stacked stone for compatibtlity with the church '~j~{- C l g CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 7 00 p m Kart Coury April 2, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439-LIFEWAY CHURCH -The development of a new church faality of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational faalities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5 03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acres) located at the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN 208-921-36 Related file DRC2001-00444 Design Review Committee Action March 5.2002 Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Kart Coury The Committee directed the applicant to add the following The Committee supported the requested 45-foot bwldmg height variance and stated that it would be acceptable based on the reason that the increase height would only apply to a small portion of the bwldmg (at the northwest comer), and the angle of the roof would be characteristic with that of a church 2 The Committee identified that the proposed architectural style of the church may not be consistent with the surrounding single-family neighborhood, but felt that added stacked stone elements, variation of the roof tde color, additional landscaping, and modification of the bwldmg colors would soften the appearance of the building and make it more compatible to the immediate area 3 Incorporate a second bwldmg material such as brick or cultured stone to add warmth to the proposed bwldings 4 Darken the proposed roof tde color (at a minimum a shade darker in brown, rather than the proposed reddish/orange color) 5 Increase the proposed reveal expansions on bwldmg face to minimum of 3 to 4 inches 6 Incorporate 30-inch by 30-inch pilasters into tubular steel fence consistent with materials used on the walls and bwldings Proposed parking lot retaining walls shall be constructed with decorative materials Incorporate mural type theme on the large wall face surface, particularly at the courtyard plaza area Design Review Committee Action March 19. 2002 Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Kart Coury The Committee reviewed the revised plans at the meeting and recommended the applicant add the following design items and submit revised plans for review at the next meeting under Consent Calendar review ~-C lq DRC COMMENTS CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH Apnl 2, 2002 Page 2 Modify the east parking lot to add more landscape planter islands and/orwiden the concrete finger islands to allow landscape area Provide additional landscaping (trees and shrubs) along the south property Ime between the proposed dnve approach and the identified single-family residences 3 Add stacked stone treatment to the center of the proposed cross tower element 4 Add stacked stone plasters to the bottom portion of the parking lot retaining walls, and maintain a constant vertical height for the stucco portion 5 Complete full width street improvement along Calle del Prado at the time of the phased development for the gymnasium or the classroom 6 Future development should include the use of stacked stone for compatibility with the church PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING FOR APRIL 2. Design Review Committee Action Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Kart Coury The Committee recommended approval subtect to the Matorand Secondary Issues contained in the staff comments The Committee also added the following recommendation The applicant shall include a landscape planter m place of proposed hardscape at the top of the north retaining wall located in the east parking lot . .` ~- Crry of Rancho Cucamonga Planning D,asan (909)477-2750 cINOFRANCHO cucAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL JU( 3 p 2001 INFORMATION FORM RECEIVEO_ (Part I -Initial Study) PLANNING INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it rs the responsrbilrty of the applicant to ensure that the application rs complete at the Gme o/ submittal, Crty slat/ Kell not be available to perform work required to provide missing mformahon Application Number for the protect fo which this /orm peRams Pro/ect Lifeway Church Tide Name 8 Addn:ss o/pro/ect 312 E. 10th St. , Pomona, CA 91766 (Attn: Dr. Esteves)' owner(s) Name & Address o/ developer or pm/ect sponsor ContactPersond Christopher Bradley, WLC Architects, Inc. Address 10470 Foothill Blvd., Tower Suite Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 " J" ~,~-cap Name 6 Address of person prepanng this loan (d dd/erent from above) Number (909) 987-0909 Information indicated by astensk (') is not regwred o(non-construction CUP~s unless otherwise requested by stall '1) Provide a full scale (8-1l2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the protect site, end indicate the ste boundanes 2) Provide a set o/color photographs which show ropresentatwe views into the site from fhe noRh, south, east and west, wews into and from the site fmm the pnmary access points which serve fhe site, end reprosentatwe wews of srgndicant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Proled Location (descnbe) Southeast corner of Vinevard Avenue and Calla Del Prado 4) Assessor-s Paroel Numbers (attach add~t~onal sheet d necessary) 208-921-36 '5) Gross Srte Area (arJsq ft) 5.36 acres including street right-of-way 'S) Net Srte Area (total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed ded~cabons) 4.88 acres 7)Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the probed site (attach add~bonal sheet rfnecessary S ~-c as 8)Include a description o(all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the protect Conditional use permit, building permit, variance for retaining walls. See attached variance written justification letter for explanation of proposed variance. 9)Descnbe the physical setting o/the site as it exists before the pm/ect ~ncludmg mlormabon on topography, sod stabdrty, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, dreinage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any exishng structures on sde (including age and conddion) and the use olthe shuctures Attach photographs o/signnc~ant features described In addr6on, site all sources of mformatron (r a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and aroheological surveys, traffic studies) The site is undeveloped with a clnpa from eacr A t r Th •i is undeveloped original soil over rock. The site is covered with grasses with no mature trees. i 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Site alt sources of information (books, published reports and oral history) None ~-c a3 11)Descnbe any norse sources and them levels that now allect the site (arrorafl, roadway norse, etc) and how they will af/ect proposed uses The site >.s essentially a typical suburban location. Vineyard Avenue generates roadway noise commensurate with a secondary street. The City-owned Red Hill Park is directly across Vineyard Avenue from the site. 12)Descnbe the proposed protect in detail Thrs should provide an adequate descnphon of the site rn farms of ultimate use which will result from the proposed protect Indicate i/there ere proposed phases /or development the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach add~bonal sheet(s) rf necessary Lifeway Church intends to build approximately 35,000 sf of buildings on the site. Phase 1 will include a sanctuary and office building fronting Vineyard Avenue and a parking lot on the east end of the site. Phase 1 is slated to be completed by the end of 2002. Phase 2 will consist of a two-story education building along Celle Del Prado behind the sanctuary to be completed by 2006. Phase 3 will consa.st of a fellowship hall behind the office building toward the south side of the site ~ooosed to be completed by -OOA. P1+ase 4 will consist of a gymnasium to the east of Phase 3 to be completed after 2010. 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, rncludmg information on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commeraal, etc ), intensity of land use Pone-/amity, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) Single family residences border the site to the north and south. Red Aill PaYk is located across Vineyard Avenue to the west. The east side of the site >_s essentially vacant land. 14)Will the proposed protect change the patfem, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the prolect7 No 3.~ c a ~{ 15)Indreate the type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, including source and amount How will these Horse levels aNect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of sound proofing are proposed The building will be entirely insulated. The pakinq lot will bring some automobile noise eastward into the site, however, the grade changes to the adjacent residences will render this noise negligible. Construction of the project will entail short-term noise generation typical to construction. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic tines Not applicable 17) Indicate any bodes of water (mdudmg domestic water supplies) into which the site drams Not applicable • 18)Ind~cate expected amount of water usage (See AttachmentA forusage estimates) Forlurtherclanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County WaterDrstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gaUday) N/A Peak use (gaUday) N/A b Commen:iaUlnd (gaUday/ac) 3000 Peak use (gaUmrn/ac) 6000 19)Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank R Sewer if sepbc tanks are proposed, attach peroolaGon tests I/discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage eshmates) For fuRher clanficabon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987- 2591 a Residential (gaUday) N/A b Commercial/!nd (gaUday/ac) 2000 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number o/residential units Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size ~,~- e a,5 Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units) 21)Antiapated range of sale pnces and/or rents Sale Pnce(s) $ to Rent (permonth) $ to 22) Specdy number of bedrooms by unit type 23) lnd~cate ant~crpated household size by unit type 24)Ind~cate the expected number of school children who wdl be residing within the protect Contact the eppropnate School Drstncts as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary b Junior High c Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type of use(sJ and major function(s) of commercial, mdustnal or rnsbtuhonal uses The facility will be used for worship, ecclesiastical instruction, indoor recreation, and daily administrative activates. 26) Total floor area of commen:ral, mdustnal, or rnst~tuhonal uses by type Commercial: 32,600 sf i s ~~1- C "~ to 27) lnd~cate hours of operation Sunday -Saturday, 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. 28) Number o/ Total employees Maximum ShrR 8 hours Time o/Maximum ShrR 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. 29)Prowde breakdown of anhapated/ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an md~cahon of the rate of hue for each classrficahon (attach additional sheet d necessary) 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hoed fhat currently reside m the City N/A '31)FOr commem~al and rndustnal uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of err pollution emrss~ons (Data should be vended through the South Coast Air Quality Management D~stnct, at (818) 572-6283) N/A ALL PROJECTS 32)Have fhe water, sewer, fire, and Good control agencies serving the pmlect been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed prolect~ l/so, please md~cate therrresponse Water Cucamonga Water District; CWD serves that area. Sewer: Cucamonga Water District; CWD serves that area. Flood Control: County of San Bernardino. Fire: Cucamonga Fire Department; CFD serves that area. ~~-c a~ In the known history o/this pmpeRy, has there been any use, storage, or discharge o/hazardous and/or toxic matenals? 33)Examples o/hazardous and/or toxic matena/s include, but are not limited to PCB, redioachve substances, peshcides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any o/the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the pmperfy, as well as the dates o/use, if known None known. 34)Will the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage ordrscharge o/hazardous and/ortoxrc matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above9 I/yes, provide an inventory o/all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the appl~cahon plans No l hereby certi/y that the statements famished above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and informahon required for adequa[e~ evaluation o/this protect to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and in/ormat~on presented are true and correct tot he best o/ my knowledge and belief I further understand that add~t~onal in/onnahon may be required to be submitted be/ore an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date ~~ 3~ ~ ~ t Signature Title '~ ~S(6~ Tf~tN1 ~~-c a8 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: DRC 2001-00439 and DRC2001-00444 2. Related Files: 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 -LIFEWAY CHURCH -The development of a new church faality of approximately 41,300 square feet to include a sanctuary, educational faalities, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5 03 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado -APN 208-921-36. Related Files DRC2001-00444. VARIANCE DRC2001-00444 -LIFEWAY CHURCH - A request to allow a10-foot parking lot retaining wall and a 15-foot parking lot retaining wall where a maximum 6-foot high wall is permitted, and increased budding height to 45-feet, where 35-feet is the permitted maximum budding height, for proposed Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for property located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado -APN 208-921-36 Related Files DRC2001-00439 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: James P Dicamillo WLC Architects, Inc 10470 Foothill Blvd., Tower Suite Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 6. Zoning: Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Single-family residences border the site to the north, south, and east To the west of the site is Redhdl Park The surrounding area is Low-Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) The site slopes from east to west at a gradient of approximately 14 percent The site contains no significant vegetation or trees Currently, Calle Del Prado is constructed to one-half width along the north property boundary ~1 LJ The development of the church campus includes a 13,985 square-foot sanctuary, a 6,000 square-foot Educational Center, a 5,600 square-foot gymnasium, 4,300 square- foot fellowship hall, 2,340 square feet of administrative offices and 400 square feet of storage space for a total of 32,625 square feet, along with the use of temporary portable classrooms and 234 parking spaces Construction at the church campus will take place in four phases Phase I includes the construction of the sanctuary and administratve office, antiapated completion 2002, Phase II will consist of a two-story education budding, antiapated completion 2006, Phase III wdl consist of a fellowship hall, ~°I-c aq Initial Study for DRC 2001-00082 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 anticipated completion 2008, and finally Phase IV well Include the gymnasium, anticipated completion 2010 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Kirt Coury (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this pro)ect, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages OLand Use and Planrnng (/) Transportation/CIrCUIatiOn O Public Services ()Population and Housing ()Biological Resources ()Utilities and Service Systems (/) Geological Problems ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) Aesthetics (/) Water ()Hazards ()Cultural Resources (/) Noise Recreation (/) Air Duality ( ) OMandatory Findings of Signfiicance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation• (~ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed s K Co March 28, 2002 jam{- C 3~ s Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified Polmtlally Issues and Supporting Information Sources y9~nnl ~~ Potentially Unless Than Sipnifimnt MN®bon Sipnifirant No I tl I teo I I d LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal• a) Conflict with general plan designation or () () () (/) zoning b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (/) polices adopted by agencies with turisdiction over the protect c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () () (/) vicinity d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () (/) ( ) established community Comments: a-b) In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, churches are permitted in a residential zone with a Conditional Use Permit The land use designation is Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), which is characteristic of the existing development surrounding the site c) Land uses in the surrounding area are designated Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Implementation of the proposed protect will build- out the site over a period of approximately eight years The relationship of church sites within single-family neighborhoods is common throughout the city Churches are allowed in any residential land use designation upon review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit d) The proposed protect includes elements of the structure that are 45-feet in height, a variance is requested allow the sanctuary and "cross" tower to be in excess of the 35-feet height limit of the Low Density Residential District The granting of a variance for the increased height of the structure will result in portions of the protect that are at least 10-feet greater height than the surrounding single-family residences The Variance also includes two separate retaining walls of up to 15'2" in height that are proposed in order to terrace the parking lot in the east portion of the site Due to the north-south fall of the topography, the difference pad elevations between adtacent properties north and south of the south of the site is as much as 40-feet The proposed retaining walls run east-west across the interior of the ~~{- C 31 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 parking lot, not at the site boundaries, and will therefore have no impact on adjacent properties The topography of the site is such that it slopes 25-feet from the north property line to the south property boundary Due to the unique topographic setting of the site, the variance for bwlding height and retaining wall height will not result on a negative aesthetic impact on the surrounding neighborhood PolenWlly Sgmfioanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Inoaa Less PNmUelly UNess Than Slmifl®nt MNgatlan Sigrofiont No I a In tea I a I a 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal. a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (/) population projections b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (/) directly or indirectly (e g ,through projects In an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (/) housing Comments: a-c) Implementation of the proposed project will not displace existing housing No major infrastructure will be developed that would be considered growth inducing within the community Implementation of the project will develop the approximately 5-acre infill site with approximately 35,000 square feet of church facilities including a sanctuary, fellowship hall, administrative offices, gymnasium and storage space Build-out of the church will have no impact to population and housing as the church will be utilized by the surrounding community PoleNany tilgrnfitanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources o-,yaa Lea Parnaany umeaa 'man Signficant MNgatlon Slgrufi®nt No I a m tea I a I a 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result rn or expose people to potential impacts involving a) Fault ruptures O O O (/) b) Seismic ground shakings O O (/) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including Iiquefaction~ () () () (/) d) Seiche hazards () () () (/) e) Landslides or mudflows~ () () () (/) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable () (/) () ( ) soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill ~ C 3~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Potenaally Issues and Supporting Information Sources S~e~roannt Ieae Po1MGally Unless Than Signfinnt AL4ga4M Sgrufirant Na 1 n In teC I n I ct g) Subsidence of the land h) Expansive soils i) Unique geologic or physical features Comments: O O O (~) O O O (~) O O O (~) a-c) No known faults pass through the site, it is not in an Alquist-Pnolo Special Studies Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red HIII Fault. The Red Hdl Fault, or Etiwanda Avenue Fault, passes within Yz mile southeast of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3Ys miles northerly. These faults are both capable of producing 6 0 to 7 0 magnitude earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to 7.5 magnitude earthquakes is approximately 14 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to 8 2 magnitude earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeast of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking The site is otherwise located on stable soils. Adhenng to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than signrficant d) The site is not located near a body of water e) The site is sloping at approximately 14 percent from east to west The Ramona Sandy Loam soils have a moderate nsk of erosion where no vegetation is present The site contains non-native annual grasses that prevent substantial erosion of the native soils f) The construction will result in changes in topography by introducing structures, parking areas and hardscape to the environment The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the General Plan update indicates that development on slopes in excess of ten percent could affect the slope, but the degree of impact is dependent on the intensity of the protect The proposed protect includes retaining walls to terrace the development across the site Standard erosion controls measures will be employed dunng construction of the site and disturbance of the native soils to minimize erosion g-i) The proposed protect is located on Ramona Sandy Loam, 9 to 15 percent slope These soils are not considered expansive soils and the potential for subsidence is minimal There are no unique geologic features on the site Potentially SiBmfipnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Inoaa less Potenaaly Unless Tian Sigrufiont 1.4ugaaon Signifiont No I C In IeE I tl I h ~j~l-C 33 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Potmlially Sipnficanl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Ira ~~ Polmhally Unless Tban Sipnfipnt MNpaoon Sipnfi®nt No I a In Ie0 I a I a 4. WATER. Wdl the proposal result in a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (/) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (/) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (/) of surface water quality (e.g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (/) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (/) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (/) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater's () () () (/) h) Impacts to groundwater quality? () () () (/) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (/) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a) Development of the prolect site is expected to result in decreased absorption rates, and increased runoff due to the introduction of paved surfaces to the site. The proposed development on the less than 5-acre site will not require the preparation of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), since grading of the site will not exceed 5 acres As a condition of prolect approval however, a drainage study/plan showing how stormwater runoff will be handled, both during construction and operation, must be provided to the City Engineer pnor to issuance of a grading permit Proper grading and drainage control will ensure this potential impact is less than significant The design of the site will direct surface water run-off to Vineyard Avenue b) The site is not located within the 100-year flood plain c-e) The prolect site is not located near a body of water f-i) The prolect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area 'g~c 34 ~I ~__~ Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 PolmLally Sipnifinnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources ImPaa ~~ Potentially Unless 711an Sipnfiont Mihpaaon Signifipnl No I a In IM I a I a 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal. a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (/) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? () (/) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, () () () (/) or cause any change in climate d) Create obtectionable odors () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed protect was screened using Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones 8 Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Un~ed Air Pollution Control Distnct, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distnct, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development protects The cntena pollutants screened for included reactive organic gases (ROG), niVous oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) When fugitive dust enters the atmosphere, the larger particles of dust quickly fall to the ground The smaller particles, however, may remain suspended for long penods and are referred to as total suspended particulates (TSP) Within TSP are dust particles that are less than ten microns in diameter and which are referred to as PM,o Since PM,o is respirateable and can senously damage the lungs, fugitive dust is a matter of concern Generally a separate analysis is done for each phase of a protect that is constructed over a penod of several years However proposed construction activities within each phase of the proposed protect, emitted only minor amounts of cntena pollutants. Therefore all phases of the protect were combined to reflect a worst-case situation As shown in Table 1, if phases 1 through IV were constructed simultaneously, construction emissions would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for cntena pollutants Construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 6"' edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model The default fleet mix was modfied to decrease the number of medium to heavy-duty diesel trucks and increase the number of light passenger vehicles, as churches generally do not receive large quantities of heavy-duty trucks At protect buildout, operational emissions do not exceed South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance (Table 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and PM,o mitigation measures will be used to minimize the protect contnbution to regional emission of cntena pollutants ~-C ~5 Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00439 Page 8 Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary For Phases I, 11, III and IV (Pounds aer Dav) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmlt Mlt Unmlt Mit Unmlt Mit Unmlt Mlt Gradin 5 11 5 11 62 34 59 23 - - 26 70 12 27 Worker Tri s 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0.00 0 00 Statlona E ui 034 034 0 27 0 27 - - 0 02 0 02 Mobile E w 1 28 1 22 13 60 12 92 - - 0.87 0 83 Arch Coatin s 0 00 0 00 - - - - - - As halt 2 62 2 49 - - - - - - Totals 9 35 8 90 76 22 72 42 0 00 0 00 27 59 13 11 SCAOMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 SI nificance No No No No No No No No Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary 2010 Build-Out (Pounds aer Dav) Source ROG NO, CO PM~o Unmd Mil Unmit Mil Unmd Mil Unmd Mlt Statlona Source 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source' 9 72 9 72 8 36 8 36 85 41 85 41 4 30 4 30 Totals 9 72 9 72 8 36 8 36 85 41 85 41 4 30 4 30 SCAQMD Thies 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No 'The proposed protect does not indude mingatlon measures (i a ,street lights, unbroken walkways, secure bike structure, or shuttle) to decrease vehiGes tops and increase pedeslnan use Therefore, there is no difference between mitlgated and unmitlgated emissions Additionally, the proposed church volt not use a significant amount of fuel that would contnbute to daily air emissions Therefore, statlonary emissions were not measurable Generally, construction of a pro)ect this size volt not exceed SCAQMD thresholds dunng grading activities for PM,o and NOx, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed condition (operational impacts) for NOx Sensitive receptors in the area include single-faintly residences surrounding the site During grading, fugitive dust (PM,o) will be generated However, any impacts to these sensitive receptors from generation of fugitive dust can be mitigated by the following measures The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2. Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prado shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated C '~(p Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00439 Page 9 with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. b) Dunng construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, and fugitive dust generated by vehicles and egwpment traveling over exposed surfaces will increase NO. and PM,o levels in the area. Table 1 shows a summary of construction emissions with and without mitigation measures The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to sensitive receptors will be at less than significant levels 5. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high~nergy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. c-d) The proposed protect is the buildout of the proposed church will result in approximately 35,000 square-feet of church facilities, including sanctuary, fellowship hall, classrooms, gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage, and parking for 234 vehicles The end use of the protect will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or objectionable odors u Potmlially Signifienl Issues and Supporting Information Sources U S T Polmtully ~e S t~n $igmfionl ALfigafion Si9^~fiont No I d In te7 I d I C 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () () (/) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , () () () (/) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) ~- C 3"l Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Potentially Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Irrpaa Less Potentally Unless Than Signifiaanl Mitigafion Sigrvfimnl No I cl Inca letl I I cl c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (/) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off- () () () (/) site e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or () () () (/) bicyclists f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting O O O (/) alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts () () () (/) Comments: a) The protect will result in increased vehicle trips compared to the existing vacant parcel Build-out of the approximately 5-acre site will result up to 35,000 square feet of church facilities, including sanctuary, fellowship hall, classrooms, gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage, and parking for 234 vehicles Build-out of the church will generate 705 lwo-way weekend trips and 105 two- way weekday trips. Protected traffic trips were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook The Congestion Management Plan (CMP) has established a threshold of 1,000 two-way peak hour trips Protects exceeding this threshold require a traffic impact analysis (TIA) Based on the land use and protected two-way taps, the proposed protect will not regwre a TIA, as traffic associated with church uses is generated during off-peak hours (weekends and weekday evenings) Build-out of church facilities at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prado will not cause a significant increase in traffic since the level of peak hour trips can be accommodated using the existing roadway infrastructure The City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation In addition, the protect is required to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site Compliance with conditions of approval will ensure that protect-related trips are less than significant b-d) The site is a rectangular parcel and currently has one entry onto Vineyard Avenue and one entry onto Calle Del Prado Proposed improvements will include the completion of street improvements along Calle Del Prado and the Vineyard Avenue frontages Driveways will provide traffic flow through the site between Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prado, so that visitors to the site will not back up on the street Access for emergency vehicles is adequate with the provision of a "hammerhead" turn around (an area of sufficient size to make a three point turn) ~.-c38 ~J Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 at the east end of the Vineyard Avenue driveway Due to the terracing nature of the parking lot entrance on Caile Del Prado, not all emergency vehicles will be able to maneuver the parking plot Therefore the large size emergency vehicles (i a fire trucks) will enter the site only fro Vineyard Avenue e-f) According to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit III-13, the Regional Multi-Purpose Trail does not cross or occur m the wanity of the site Implementation of the proposed protect will not be hazardous to pedestrians or bicyclists nor will it conflict with alternative transportation, such as bus turnouts/bicycle racks, as there are none adtacent to the site g) The site is approximately five miles north of Ontario Airport This is far enough to minimize noise and hazard impacts Potentially Issues and Supporting Information Sources slant bin Polentlally Unless Than Siprvfirant Mibgatlan Sigrufi®nt No I C In tail I d I tl BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to• a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or () ( ) () (/) their habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated speaes (e g ,heritage trees, () ( ) () (/) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () ( ) () (/) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~ d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () ( ) () (/) vernal pool) Comments: a) The protect site and surrounding area is not within the Ontario Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified vnthin Figure 6 of the US Fish 8 Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997 The protect site is vacant and contains minimal vegetation Past grading/weed abatement activities have eliminated native at the site Property surrounding the site is developed with residential or recreational uses and does not contain adequate habitat for any endangered or threatened speaes b-c) The proposed protect will not regwre the removal of any mature trees or other locally designated natural communities d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat at neither of the sites 'g~l-C ~°I Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 e) The protect site is surrounded by residential development to the north, south and east Recreational development occurs west of the site across Vineyard Avenue Development surrounding the site has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past Pae•n~ny Spmfitgni Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenWlly Unless TLh~en SiBnlfiranl MiOgaLan Sipnifirant No I In tetl I a I a 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (/) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (/) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (/) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments: a-c) Buildout of the site will not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans, nor constitute a wasteful or inefficient use of energy. According to the California State Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, the site is not within a regionally significant aggregate resource area as shown on Exhibit IV-1 of the Draft General Plan Additionally, the surrounding area is developed with single-family homes PolML311y 9pufimnl Ingetl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polentlally unless Than Sign~ficanl MiLgdson SIpNfl~anl No I a In te0 I a I a 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () () () (/) hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (/) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (/) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () () () (/) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (/) brush, grass, or trees ~c yo s Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Comments: a/c) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils was observed during a recent site visit Development of the protect site will not expose people or the environment to any known hazardous materials b) A 24-foot driveway will be located at the end of Calle Del Prado, and a 26-foot driveway is proposed at the southwest corner of the site along Vineyard Avenue Fire hose locations will be approved per Fire Department All terminating streets on-site provide appropriate turn radius for emergency vehicles. Access for emergency vehicles is adequate with the provision of a hammerhead turnout at the east end of the Vineyard Avenue driveway d) No evidence of discarded drums, containers, hazardous wastes or discolored soils was observed onsite. There was no indication of underground storage tanks or illegal dumping of refuse on-site. e) The site is within a developed residential/recreational area and is not located in a brush/wildland fire hazard area. raemm~y Sipn~fiOm Issues and Supporting Information Sources vovrmny unm ,awn Sipmfinanl A4Y~fi0n $i~vfi®nl No i a in iea i a trRaa 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in• a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (/) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () (/) () () Comments: a) Traffic along Vineyard Avenue is the predominant source contributing to the ambient noise level in the area Sensitive receptors including surrounding single-family residences will be exposed to elevated noise levels dunng construction Since the protect is occumng in four phases, only scheduled construction to occur during a particular phase will occur at a given time. Therefore elevated noise levels will be short-term and will cease once the construction of that phase is complete The following mitigation measures, as required by the Development Code, would reduce short-term construction-related noise impacts assoaated with the proposed protect 8. During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, • with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers standards. ~71-C y ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00439 Page 14 9. The project contractor shall place all stationary equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 10. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site, during all phases of project construction. 11. During all phases of project construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall occur on Sundays and public holidays. b) The proposed prolect is the master plan for a church, including classrooms and a new sanctuary, at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prado The site is an infill parcel in a residential sector of the City, no significant noise sources exists, nor will the church faality contnbute to the cause of severe noise levels in the neighborhood, therefore no mitigation is required. ~ntl>,tlY 9pNfi®m Irtpea Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources raentle~y unbea Than Sip~ufi®nt Mibgatlon $ipmfioent No i n m tea i a i a 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protections () () () (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Maintenance of public faalities, including () () () (/) roads e) Other governmental services () () () (/) Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The site is currently served by a fire station located on San Bernardino Road, within one mile northeast of the prolect site Standard conditions of approval from the Urnform Budding and Fire Codes will be placed on the prolect Police Protection -The site is within a developed area that is currently patrolled • The approximately 35,000 square feet of church faalities will only incrementally increase the need for routine police protection services, consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and Development Impact Fee Schedules adopted by the City Council 'PJ-1-C ~(a Irntial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Schools -Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area Proposed church facilities will not result in a significant amount of new employees Employees for similar facilities include a pastor and an assistant, office staff, and a youth director Employees will likely be hired from within the community and will not increase the need for schools Public Faalities -The proposed prolect includes approximately 35,000 square foot church campus on approximately 5 acres Traffic at build-out (2010) is expected to generate 705 two-way weekend tnps and 105 two-way weekday taps The City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant pnor to issuance of building permits Fees will be used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation Compliance with this condition of approval will ensure that impacts to public facilities are less than significant. aa~mm~y $iprfigM Issues and Supporting Information Sources rad,ueny u"°ai«i ,khan SiprYfi®M A4tlQatlm Sigafl®nt fYo i ted i a i a 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result rn a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alferat~ons to the following utdrt~es: a) Power or natural gasp () ( ) () (/) b) Communication systems () ( ) () (/) c) Local or regional water treatment or distnbution () ( ) () (/) facilities d) Sewer or septic tanks () ( ) () (/) e) Storm water drainages () ( ) () (/) f) Solid waste disposals () ( ) () (/) g) Local or regional water supplies () ( ) () (/) Comments: a-g) The prolect will use existing gas, electncal and communication systems in the immediate area Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler. Currently municipal solid waste from the City is taken to San Bernardino, Riverside or Orange County landfills for disposal, depending on the hauler The prolect will increase demand upon stone drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape proposed on the vacant site. The site will dram to Vineyard Avenue No new storm drain facilities are regwred to accommodate development of the site The prolect will not result in substantial alterations to the master plan of storm drainage The impact is not considered significant since it will be mitigated by providing proper stormwater drainage per the City Engineer ~-c y3 Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Potenlully Sgnfimni I,ryaa Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paent~fiy Unl'ss Tun SipNficant MifigatiM Sipnlfimnt No I a m tea I a I a 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (/) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic () () () (/ ) effect c) Create light or glare? () () (/) ( ) Comments: a-b) In order to integrate the building to the surroundings, the applicant has proposed a terraced site design. The building will be sufficiently setback from property lines and curb face of Vineyard Avenue and Calle Del Prado to eliminate impacts to adtacent properties The proposed protect includes elements of the structure that are 45-feet in height, a variance is requested allow the sanctuary and "cross" tower to be in excess of the 35-feet height limit of the Low Density Residential Distnct. The granting of a variance for the increased height of the structure will result in portions of the protect that are at least 10-feet greater height than the surrounding single-family residences The Variance also includes two separate retaining walls of up to 15'2" in height that are proposed in order to terrace the parking lot in the east portion of the site Due to the north-south fall of the topography, the difference pad elevations between adtacent properties north and south of the south of the site is as much as 40-feet The proposed retaining walls run east-west across the intenor of the parking lot, not at the site boundaries, and will therefore have no impact on adtacent properties The topography of the site is such that it slopes 25-feet from the north property line to the south property boundary Due to the unique topographic setting of the site, the vanance for building height and retaining wall height will not result on a negative aesthetic impact on the surrounding neighborhood. b) The addition of the proposed church facilities and parking will require nighttime outdoor lighting As a standard condition of development, the applicant will be required to submit a lighting plan to ensure there are no impacts to sensitive receptors Initial Study for DRC 2001-00439 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 PUmWlly SiBNflmnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources rpn,Ballr u~a; TLh~en SIBnIfi®nt Mingatlon S~Bryflrant NO I p In teC I p I p 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb paleontological resources b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (/) c) Affect histoncal or cultural resources () () () (/) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change () () () (/) which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restnct existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (/) the potential impact area? Comments: a-e) The surrounding area is developed with residential and recreational uses At the time this development occurred, no resources were discovered; a nd no resources are anticipated at this site PBtmtleP/ $IQltlflplllt Issues and Supporting Information Sources PIXmtlely imm it» SIpYR®nt Mltlpatlm $iptlfl®nt No I p I tetl I p I p 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal. a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities () () () (/) Comments• a) Proposed construction activities will not generate a substantial number of new lob opportunities or induce people to move to the protect area. Proposed church facilities will require minimal employees Employees at similar facilities include a pastor and an assistant, office staff, and a youth director. This amount of employees is not significant and it is likely a majority of them will be hired from within the community Therefore the proposed protect will not increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks b) The development of the site will not have a negative impact on the Redhill Park located on the west side of Vineyard Avenue i ~-c ~5 Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00439 Page 18 rolanwny SiprcfitPnl Irtpad Lars Issues and Supporting Information Sources rolanua~~r uniaba Than 9prufiont Mibgaban Sipnlflranl No I ct In letl I d I d 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have () () () (/) the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restnct the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () () () (/) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively bnef, definitive penod of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts () () () (/) that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () () () (/) environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The protect site and surrounding area is not within the Ontano Habitat Recovery Unit for the Delhi Sands Flower-Loving Fly (DSFLF) as identified within Figure 6 of the US Fish & Wildlife Service Final Recovery Plan for the DSFLF dated September 14, 1997 The protect site is vacant and contains minimal vegetation Past grading/weed abatement activities have eliminated vegetation at the site Property surrounding the site is developed with residential or recreational uses and does not contain adequate habitat for any endangered or threatened species Additionally, due to the infill nature of the site it is unlikely that cultural or historical resources will be discovered ~-C 4~ Intial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00439 Page 19 b) The Initial Study identified short-term impacts to air quality and noise with development of the project site The short-term impacts will occur due to proposed construction activities. However, the impacts will cease once construction activities are completed. Implementation of mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study and standard Conditions of Approval will reduce short-term impacts to less than significant c) The proposed project is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and sphere of influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however they would not reduce impacts to less than sigrnficant levels As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestnan friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. d) The proposed 32,625 square feet of church faalities, including a sanctuary, fellowship hall, classrooms, gymnaswm, administrative offices and storage space will be developed on 4 88 acres of land At build-out the faality will be completely developed with parking, lighting, and landscaping The proposed protect would not result in any significant impacts to the environment EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (~) City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR (October 17, 2001) (~) Preliminary Soils Investigation, prepared by Roger Shervington, September 1985 ~jal-C ~1~7 Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2001-00439 Page 20 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the protect descnbed m this Irntial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Irntial Study and that there no regwred mitigation measures, and this protect will clearly have no significant environrAental effects r Signature: ~ Date. ~ ~ D~ Pnnt Name and Title: ~P~ ~/s~~s' `~ ~~-c ~8 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental t?uallty Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 Public Review Period Closes: Apnl 24, 2002 Project Name: Lifeway Church Project Applicant: Lifeway Church % WLC Archdects, Inc Project Location (also see attached map): )Located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado - APN 208-921-36 Project Description: The phased developmentofanewchurchfacilityofapprowmately41,300squarefeetto include a sanctuary, educational facilfies, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and storage on 5 03 acres of land in the Low Residential Distnct (2~ dwelling units per acre Related Fde Vanance DRC2001-00444 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine ff the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ® The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ^ The Initial Study xlentified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signficant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a signficant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The projectfile and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Chris Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. u Aon124.2002 Date of Determination Adopted By a.l-c ~~ RESOLUTION NO 02-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH MASTER PLAN, INCLUDING A SANCTUARY, EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES, A GYMNASIUM, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, AND STORAGE ON 5 03 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND CALLE DEL PRADO, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN 208-921-36 A Recitals 1 Lifeway Church filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439, as descnbed rn the tale of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 24th day of Apnl 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deterrnined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby speafically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and con-ect 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on Apnl 24, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado, with a street frontage of approximately 286 feet along Vneyard Avenue, and an approximate lot depth of 720 feet, and is presently vacant, and b The property to the north, south, and east of the subtect site is zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and the property to the west is zoned Open Space (ewsting Red Hdl Park), and c The application contemplates the immediate construction of 19,415 square feet of sanctuary, administrative offices, storage on-site, and master planned future development of another 21,900 square feet of building space for use as an educational center, a fellowship hall, and a gymnaswm, and d The property has a significant slope from west to east The proposed protect and grading concept contemplates the use of on-site retaining walls in the east parking lot Development of the parking lot well regwre construction of retaining walls of up to 15 feet in height. ~.E-C 50 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH Apnl 24, 2002 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, Hell not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the viGmty c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code d The design of the protect is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans sand wildlife or their habitat 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findmgs as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance vnth the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaration and Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that v~nll result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Plamm~g Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5. Based upon the findmgs and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every conddion set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ~-C 5 I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH April 24, 2002 Page 3 Planning Droision 1) Light fixtures shall be constructed at a maximum height of 15 feet (to include pedestal), and shall be shielded and directed away from residential areas A detailed Lighting Plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be prepared prior to issuance of building permits to provide proper shielding of light sources from adjoining properties 2) Additional landscaping and trees shall be provided along the south end of the property to screen the drive aisle along the south property line and the proposed parking lot in Phase 1, to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3) All future building pads and partung areas shall be seeded and imgated for erosion control Detailed plans shall be included in the Landscape and Imgation Plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval poor to the issuance of budding permits 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance wrath any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Budding Code, or any other City Ordinances 5) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adtacent businesses or residences, the Conditional Use Pertnit shall be brought before the City Planner for consideration and possible termination of the use 6) Any signs proposed for the faality shall be designed in conformance wrath the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the City Planner, prior to installation 7) The Master Plan is approved in concept only Future development for each budding proposed in Phases 2, 3, and 4 shall be subject to separate Development Review process 8) Ali landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy growing condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming 9) This approval is for the operation of a church and office and does not include a daycare or private K-12 school 10) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 11) Lifeway Church shall not use Red Hill Park parking lots fortheirparivng ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH Apnl 24, 2002 . Page 4 12) The applicant shall include a landscape planter in place of proposed hardscape at the top of the north retaining wall located in the east parlvng lot 13) The applicant shall add a detail cap at the top of the stacked stone plasters proposed on the retaining walls located m the east parking lot, subled to City Planner review and approval 14) The applicant shall provide a 6-foot high decorative wall (to match the proposed east parking lot retaining walls) along the southern end of the south dnve aisle, terminating at first parking stall of the east parlung lot to screen on-site vehicular traffic light glare and noise from existing single-famly residences to the south 15) Reduce the proposed grade from 2 percent to 1 percent at the southeast comer of the property to eliminate the necessity of a single large retaining wall, and incorporate terraced retaining walls, subled to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Engmeenng Division 1) Missing improvements along Vineyard Avenue shall be installed including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, signing, stnping, dnve approaches, etc., and as requred Vineyard Avenue is a City'Collector Street' 2) Calle del Prado cul-de-sac shall be fully constructed with curb and gutter on the north side, curb and gutter and sidewalk on the south side, dnve approach, streetlights, street trees, signing, stnping, etc , m accordance with City "Local Cul-de-Sac," 36 feet curb to curb, and a 60-foot nght-of--way Dedication of nght-of--way is required (30 feet from the existing centerline to southerly nght-of-way) The cul-de-sac needs to utlize the existing nght-of-way 3) Water runoff from Calle del Prado wll not be allowed to dram through the dnveway to the parlung lot 4) Commercial dnveways on Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado shall be 35 feet minimum per City standard 5) Overlay Calle del Prado 0 10-foot minimum, including the north side of the street as directed by the City Engineer Environmental Mdiaatwn Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stablizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daly to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance vnth SCAQMD Rule 403 'F~~-G53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH Apnl 24, 2002 Page 5 2) Uneyard Avenue and Calle del Prado shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PM~o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 4) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based onlow-emission factors and high-energy effiaengr The construction contractor shall ensure the construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment well be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications 6) The contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered egwpment where feasible 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut of egwpment when not in use Noise 1) Dunng all protect site excavation and grading, the protect contractors shall equip all construction equipment, faced or mobile, wrath property operating and maintained mufflers consistent wrath the manufacturers' standards 2) The protect contractor shall place all stationary equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the protect site 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise, and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site dunng all phases of protect construction 4) Dunng all phases of protect construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m Monday through Saturday No construction shall occur on Sundays and public holidays The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH Apnl 24, 2002 Page 6 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Rich Maaas, Vice Chauman Brad Buller, Secretary i, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of Apnl 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS• NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~J City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2001-00439/DRC2001-00444 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the protect. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Diwsion 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~C 5~Q Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained If technical expertise beyond the City staffs Is needed, as determined by the prolect planner or responsible Clty department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the prolect planner. 4 The prolect planner or responsible Clty department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was Identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure Is verified for compliance, no further action Is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an Impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the prolect planner or responslble City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The prolect planner is responslble for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe prolect planneror responsible Clty department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The prolect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been Issued. The prolect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies If compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The prolect planner or responsible Clty department has the authority to hold Issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigatOn) that require monitoring after prolect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessaryfunds (or otherfonns of guarantee) with the Clty. These funds shall be used by the Clty to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of Ume. 9. In those instances requinng long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the prolect site and reporting the monitoring results to the Clty. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether fhe particular mitigation measure has been Implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the Issuance of building penults I \FINAL\CE~AUAMP Forth-rev wpd ~~ ^ G MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 Applicant: Lifewav Church Initial Studv Prepared bv: Kirt Courv Date: April 1, 2002 .. - ~ . .. . . ~ . f1 AirQ~la)(t , __ ..tie r }::t~ y ~ ~ ~ ,`-,'.-a,,S ~ y ' S.: ~, 7 ~ w °tT•7~'~~ ~hS' }"~v° ,'*~ ,» ~Yftw~„ ~ ' •i.~F't w ,t-' ~°+< -Z7 'Clt ' vr'b~~ ~ Ff'f,', #"~ ^rt ~ ~i~a :X~~~'" nl`6~~- ^5~ '? g ~'~',~c.) +,,.~'€~r ' 'F``'i~~' ~• ~ qty x4A•.e£:" ~ ~. 7µp ,~3]P'R^4 ~ '" ? ~ua ~A ~~'r J-'ei r~"~a.~ v „ J .4\ . -9 .d t~ w » . W x . ' ' , '", /i.~., ~ • vt r : ~ +S°s !> ,.: LAM + ( ~ i. ,..' J i:'•~. ~,e` . + .a vt A .if . The site shall be treated w,th water or other so,l-stabilinng agent CP C Review of plans A/C . 2 (approved by SCApMD and RWpCB) da,ly to reduce PM,o emss,ons, m accordance vnth SCAQMD Rule 403 V,neyard Avenue and Calla del Prado shall be swept according to a CP C Review of plans AIC p schedule established by the C,ty to reduce PM,o emissions assouated with veh,Ge traGang of sod off-sde Timing may vary depend,ng upon time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed CP C Review of plans AIC 2 25 miles per hour to minim,ze PM,o emissions from the s,te during such ep,sodes Chemical sod stabdrzers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall CP C Review of plans A/C 2 be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain ,native for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The consWCtion contractor shall select the censWCtion equipment CP B!C Review of plans A/C 2 used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energy efficiency The construction contrator shall ensure the censfrution Grading Plans include a statement that all consWtion equipment will be tuned and maintained m accordance with the manufaturers speaficaticns Tha contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel-powered CP C Review of plans A/C 2 equipment where feasible The censWction contractor shall ensure that censtruction Grading CPICE B Review of plans C 2 Plans incude a statement that work crews will shut of equipment when not In use NOI59 - n ,, •,~',^'4y'~;S}~. ~ ti vr'1. ,).' ':4y ~r.. ,,.r> "' .r. . , j ' Dunng all prolet sde excavation and grading, the prolet CP C Notes on Grading A 4 contrators shall equip all consfrution egwpment, fixed or mobile, plans/site with propedy operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the inspections manufaturers' standards The protect centiator shall place all stationary egwpment so that CP C Notes on Grading A 4 emitted noise is duetted away from sensitive receptors nearest the plans/slle protect sde Inspections a The construction contractor shall locate egmpmenl staging m areas CP that will create the greatest distance between consWCtion related noise, and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the prated site dunng all phases of project construction Dunng all phases of project constructlon, the construction contractor CP shall limit all construction related adiwties that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6 30 a m and 8 00 p m Monday through Saturday No consWdion shall occur on Sundays and public holidays Key to Checklist Abbreviations Notes on Grading planslsite Inspections Notes on Grading pianslsde inspections ReSpOnSiblePerSOn ~ _ MonltorlnpFrequency~,, r~~.^ey r rn~~ Method of Verlflcatlon~1'';""~".~;t=~:~ ~ ' , Sanctions ~ ~ - - CDD -Community Development Director or designee ~ A -With Each New Development , A - On-site Inspection t W CP -Cary Planner or designee B - Pnor To ConsWction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval - ithhold Recordation of Finai Map 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO -Building Ofricial or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports (Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Capfam or designee E -Operating FC - Fve Chief or designee 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP V' r~ V^, e1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 41,300 SQUARE FOOT SANCTUARY, EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES, GYMNASIUM, AND SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES APPLICANT: LIFEWAY CHURCH LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND CALLE DEL PRADO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements Completion Date The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought agamst the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relrnquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included m legible form on the grading plans, bwldmg and construction plans, and landscape and irngation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DeveiopmenUDesign Review approval shall expve rf bwldmg permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and mamtained in accordance with the approved plans which rnclude site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations ~~_ ~~. ~~_ ~~. SC-02-02 1 lc~~.,C, ~0 Protect N o DRC2001-00439 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all ~_/_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code ~___/ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Budding and Safety Droision to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4 Revised site plans and bwldmg elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwldmg permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, trngatton, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for ~___/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fvst 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development ___/~_ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans to effect at the time of buiding permit issuance 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and _/~_ approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adfacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, ~_/_ and the number of trash receptacles shall be subfect to City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bulding permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall ~_/_ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vauRs 10 All bwldmg numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, ~~_ including proper illumination 11 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter. If a double ~_/ wail condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adfoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the profect's perimeter 12. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link ~___/ to maintain an open feeling and enhance views 13 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be _/~_ manufactured products D. Building Design 1 All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted egwpment and/or _/~_ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adfacent properties and streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in bwldmg plans SC-02-02 2 ~ _ 1 Prgect No DRC2001-00439 Completion Date E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 Ail parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum o1 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards 5 Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercal and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped 6 Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and tramming methods 3 Wdhin parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of budding 5 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 6 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and vrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy ~~. / / ~~- ~~- ~~- ~-/_ ~~- ~-/ ~~. -_/~ -/-/- _/_/. SC-02-02 3 ~~ C / _ Protect N o DRC2001-00439 Completion Dete 7 For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible ~___/_ for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage 8 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be __J-/_ included in the required landscape plans and shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be requred by the Engineering Division 9 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on _/~_ the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 10 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, __J-/_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of -J~- Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this ~___/_ approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall requve separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs H. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the protect. The applicant is responsible for the cost of ~-/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Ciry Planner in the amount of $ 719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions requred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit I. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and ___/~_ location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the - design of the overhead structure shall be sublect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permrts APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/~_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, SC-02-02 4 ~.C W :J Protect NO DRC2001-00439 Completion Dete d Ceding and Rooi Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods _/~_ report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and `wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls ~~_ 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation ~___/- coverage to the City prior to permit issuance 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by ~~- the Building and Safety Division K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be ~~_ marked with the protect file number (i a ,CUP 98-01) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Bwldmg Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bwlding permits for a new commercial or industrial development or ~~- addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Offiaal, after tracUparcel map recordation ~___/_ and prior to issuance of budding permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6.30 a m Monday ~___/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public -(~- counter) L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwldmg Code for the property line clearances ~_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Bwldmg Code for regwred occupancy separation(s) -/~- 3 Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino ~-/_ Environmental Health Services pnor to issuance of bwlding permits 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC ~-/_ Table 5-A SC-02-02 5 W ` ~-- ~p~ Protect NO DRC2001-00439 Comolehon Date 5 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 6 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 7 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906 8 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed M. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits 5 In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17 24.070 6 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed well generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califomia Registered Civd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline)• 30 total feet on Calle del Prado (South side Wahl-of-wavl 2 Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards O. Street Improvements 1 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike ether Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Treil Island Trail Calle del Prado X X X X X X Vine and Avenue X X X X X Notes (a) Median island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item _~~ -/-J ~-~- ~~- -/-/_ ~~_ ~~- ~~. ~~_ ~~-. ~-J. -~~- ~~- -/_J. C~ SC-02-02 6 ~.C ~ 5 Project No DRC2001-00439 Completion Date 2' Improvement Plans and Constructtorc a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety itghts on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Ciwl Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b. Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits requred c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect condwt shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per Cdy Standards or as directed by the City Engineer e Existing City roads regwnng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots 3 Street trees, a mwmum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 4 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows SEE ATTACHED STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM. P. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the regwrements of the Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential protects ~~- ~-~- ~ ~~_ ~~- ~~- -/~- ~-~- ~_~- ~~- ~-~- -/_/_ ~~- SC-02-02 7 ~'~ ~I Protect NO DRC2001-00439 Completion Date R. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Ctty, covering the estimated operating costs for _/~ i all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to bwiding permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1 All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. ~_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, _J~_ with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entve development 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures _/_/_ T. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors _J~- 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are ~~_ within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices ~~~ 4 All roof openings giving access to the bwlding shall be secured with either iron bars, metal ~~_ gates, or alarmed U. Security Fencing 1 All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the ~~_ police with a keypad access and a unique code The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24- hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 V. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be _/_/_ lifted from frame or track in any manner W. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for ~_/_ nighttime visibility APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SC-02-02 8 ~~-C,, ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM (REVISED 3/5/02) LAST UPDATED 8/27, DATE: 11/6/01 T0: HENRY MURAKOSHI, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: JANELL DAVIS, CONTRACT LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKER PROJECT: DRC2001-00439 LOCATION: VINEYARD &CALLE DEL PRADO SIGN NOTE 1 STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST, BASED UPON AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-OF-CURB AND THE SIDEWALK) ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES CONTACT LAURA BONACCORSI AT 90977-2740, EXT 4023 FOR INFORMATION 2 STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME 3 STREETTREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4 INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTH-SOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST WIND-PRONE AREAS MAY BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE 5 INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ON-SITE PLANS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED 6. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS ABOUT PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILITIES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECT THE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMIT ANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FINAL LEGEND 7. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT A LINE ITEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO STATE. STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE NOTES ANO LEGEND ON SHEET (TYPICALLY SHEET 1) .STREET~AME~ L- 3 e }it ^. F/ jg , - L ~ 3 p ~ G54..,c~'l~3i3~f Cv£ -J' ~BQ A ICAL'`;NAME~, vp. sr ai"xiivc'ae"~ti 4 ~M.~ ~ r h(SaFr`i C014~ ,O.,~H '~"~'~ .T.;.. SsJ a ~.` yy~+~"v " ~ c1'Y ~, W}~~ ~-r'~t xl~~~~ FMINc~GROW~, ~=" i~t 'S ti '~u1h~_ c.['~ac.~..~~, ~SPACING~~ ~J'~r{~*'x.a~7•~' ti :.tinyTi~IY~+N~. 'Y. -S1 ~ -~ ~ ~~~ e '~SF~ iQIY~'``'~~u ~FY ~^.- P1 - ~.dJy.'~ _ VINEYARD RHUS LANCER AFRICAN SUMAC 5' 20'0 C is GAL FILL (LOCAL ST ) IN CALLE DEL PRADO PYRUS CALLERYANA NCN 3' 20' 0 C 15 GAL FILL 'ARISTOCRAT IN *TREES SHALL BE 15 GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR STREET TREES: 1. ALL STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARD PLANS. 2 PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PLANTING, AN AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE CITY INSPECTOR. ANY UNUSUAL TOXICITIES OR NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES MAY REQUIRE BACKFILL SOIL AMENDMENTS, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. 3 ALL STREET TREES ARE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION. 4. STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED PER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS ONLY "~j~-C bg '-~. ~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ., - -~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION S STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0563-A PROJECT #: DRC2001-00439 PROJECT NAME: Lifeway Church DATE: January 12, 2002 PLAN TYPE: Conditional Use Permit APPLICANT NAME: W LC Architects OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group A, Division 2 and Group B FLOOR AREA (S): 14,304 s.f and 4,648 s.f. TYPE coNSrRUCTION: Type V-1 hr and Type V NR LOCATION: SECVmeyard and Calle de Prado FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locate, Fire Protection Plamm~g Specialist PLANNER: Kart Coury ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following comments and conditions represent the minimum standard for Fire Distract approval of the protect as submitted These conditions are based upon rewew of the plans as submitted Although we have tried, not all Fire District requrements for the proposed protect may be included Additions to or changes in the protect may result in additional or changed Fire Distract requirements Please make the necessary changes or corrections pnor to resubmitting for review "Bold" items identified below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Plamm~g Division to obtain Fire Distract approval If your protect is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fire Distract conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued Contact the Fire Safety Droision to schedule an appointment to venfv compliance A. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1 Pnor to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the rewew and approval by the Fire District and the Water Distract 2 Pnor to the issuance of any bwldmg permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fve District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distract standards Contac the Fire Safety Division f~ a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans " 3 Required Note: When any portion of a facility or bwldmg is located more than 150-feet from a fve hydrant located on a public street, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the regwred fire flow shall be provided The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on adtacent access roadways, not Ime of sight ~~C.. ~^ 4 Requlred Note: The required fire flow for this project shall be 1700 gallons per minute at a minimun residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This regwrement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended For site planning purposes one fire hydrant is requred per 1000 gallons of required fire flow 5 Required Note: The regwred fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fve Code Appendix III-B, as amended 6 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radws of the proposed prolect may be used to prowde the regwred fire flow subject to Fve District rewew and approval Private fue hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to prowde regwred fire flow 7 Required Note: All requred public fve hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc.) Water Distract personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit test report to the Fve Safety Division 8. Required Note: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible bwldmg materials on-site (i a ,lumber, roofing materials, etc) Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing The bwlder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 9 For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the bwlder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Dmsion. 10 Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the prolect shall be shown on the water plan submitted for rewew and approval Include main size 9 Prior to the issuance of a fue sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Drnsion for approval. 10 If the system is prorate the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the bwldmg permit a Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repay, and maintenance of the system. A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District. b For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, that shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance 11 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On prorate property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner B. Water Availability 1 Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a bwldmg permit, the applicant shall prowde evidence of adequate fire flow The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Ava~labdrtv for Fire Protection Form shall be completed by the Water Distract and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract If sufficient water to meet fire flow regwrements is not available, an automatic fire extingwshing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow C. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 Regwred Note: RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard regwres an approved automatic fire spunkier system to be installed throughout the building(s) 2 Required Note All commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, mutts-family residential structures, and all structures that do not meet Fire District access regwrements (See Fire Access below), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire spunkier system ~tV `O 3 Plans for the required automatic fire sprinkler system shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval No work is allowed without a permit issued by Fire Construction Services 4 Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 5 The fire spunkier system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediatel~j following the completion of the fire sprinkler system Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupanaes, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupanaes D. Fire Access 1 Required Note: Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a bwldmg constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the bwldmg is located more than 150-feet from Fire District approved vehicle access The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building 2 Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes 3. CommerciaUlndustrial and Multi-family Residential-Required Note Pnor to recordation of a subdrvision/tract/parcel map or the issuance of any grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans and specification for the approval of the Fire Distract for all Fire Distract access roadways to within 150-feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-site 4 Roadways and Fire Lanes-Required Note Pnor to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets, courts and cul-de-sacs from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150-feet or when otherwise required Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc.), control gates, bollards, or other modrfications in fire lanes access roadways without prior written approval of the Fve District, Fue Safety Division. 5 Private Roadways and Fire Lanes-Required Note The inside turn radws shall be 20-feet The outside turn radws shall be not less than 50-feet The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire District access roadway or fire lane is 26-feet The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 niches At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet 6 Dead-end Fire District Access Roadways-Required Note Dead-end Fire District access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the fuming around of fire apparatus This may include a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire Distract 7 Required Note All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire Distract vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the bwldmg Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction 8 Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior bwldmg openings 9 Required Note All buildings that have three or more stories, or are 30-feet in height shall be provided with fve apparatus access on at least two sides Access to exterior walls shall extend from 5 to 50-feet horizontally, with no vertical obstructions 10 Knox Rapid Entry System A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final bwldmg plan approval Contact the Fire Safety Division for specrf~c details and ordering information 11 Requved Note• Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trammed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6~1 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fue vehicles 1 12 Required Note Emergency access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstruchons at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire Distract Standards 1~G ~ 1 13 Pnor to the issuance of a bwiding permit, the applicant shall submit plans and obtain approval from the Fire District for regwred Fire District access roadways less than 40-feet in width When fire lanes are regwred the plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard 14 Fire Lanes Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibR parking in the fire lanes The method of enforcement shall be documented The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all regwred fve lanes 15 New bwldings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance 27 In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or bwlding identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, swtes, or buildings The Fve District shall review and approve the numbering plan m coordination with the CRy of Rancho Cucamonga E. Traffic Signal Preemption Devices 1 Pnor to the recordation of the applicable subdmsion map, the Fire District rn consultation with the City Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Devices F. Combustible Construction Letter 1 Required Note: Pnor to the issuance of a building permk for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times. G. ArchRectural Building Plans 1 Pnor to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District Cali the Fire Construction Services Und at (909) 477-2713 for any required notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal H. Fire District Service Fees' 1 The following fees may be applicable to this project and are being ident'dled at this time to assist the applicant in planning for tuture costs. Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required installations subject to approval by the Fire District. The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted. When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division " $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial ormulti-family dwelling protects (Paid prior to TRC) $66 Fire District Access Review (Includes Fire Lane Plans) $132 CondRional Use Permit Review Fee (CUP) $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new bwlding) for New Commercial and Industrial Development . " Pius a microficheAaser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for all frnal plans approved by the Fue Safety Division 'Note Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fve extingwshing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans 2 The following service fees are due to the Fire Distract and payable at this time: $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial ormutts-family dwelling protects (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Conditional Use Pennrt Review Fee (CUP) $214 -Total due at this time. Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonga Fire District." " Plus a microficheAaser-fiche fee of $1 00 per plan sheet for ali final plans approved by the Fire Safety Dmsion 'Note: Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fve Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fve sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc ), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans I. Hazard Control Permds 1 As noted below Speaal Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s) a. Operate a place of public assembly. To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the requred fire distract access roadway. This includes any gate, barrier, trafficcalming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays or slows Fire District response c Candles and open flame in public assembly J. Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The below listed businesses, operations, uses or condi4ons regwre that the San Bemardino County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fve, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms ar~ assistance They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material m quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year 2 All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated. 3 Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pestiades, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount. 4 Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount 5 Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T.P O) Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed m 40 CFR Part 355. 6 Any business subfect to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds, or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1998 upgrade regwrements To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202 Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this regwrement, however, EPCRA does regwre full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1 Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory ~ 7 Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR [3~- c..'t3 8 If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous material disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be requred if regulated substances are to be used or stored at the new facility Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Dmsion at (909) 387-3041 for forms and assistance 9. Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and ~s required to submit a Plan, is required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subtect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Pian to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner 10 The Fve Code adopted by the Fire Distract has a provision regwring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be requued in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs K. Plan Submittal Regwred Notice 1 Plans shall be subm~ted and approved prior to construction in accordance wRh 1997/98 Bulding, Fve, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes, 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards L. Other Fire District Reqwrements or Comments 1. NOTE The Fire Safety Division has previously met with representative of WLC regarding fire district access. The resuks of that meeting are not reflected in the current resubmlttal. Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 11/20/01 Revision 'Pj.~.. c `1 ~{ . RESOLUTION NO 02-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2001-00444, A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FROM 30 FEET TO 45 FEET AND INCREASE THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET UP TO A MAXIMUM 15 FEET WITHIN THE EAST PARKING LOT IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND CALLE DEL PRADO, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 20&921-36 A Rentals 1 Lifeway Church filed an application for the issuance of Vanance DCR2001-00444, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Vanance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 24th day of Apnl 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on Apnl 24, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together wrath public testimony, this Commission hereby speafically finds as follows a The application applies to Conditional Use Pertnit DRC2001-00439, located on the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado, which has significant grade differential from north to south, and b The properties to the north and south of the subject site are developed with single- famdy residences The property to the east is predominately vacant with asingle-family residence on-site To the west is an existing park (Red Hill Park), and c The application contemplates the immediate construction of 19,415 square feet of sanctuary, administrative offices, storage on-site, and master planned future development of another 21,900 square feet of budding space for use as an educational center, a fellowship hall, and a gymnaswm, and . d The Vanance request is to increase the maximum budding height of 30 feet to 45 feet of the proposed sanctuary budding, and d•~-C ~5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-44 VAR DRC2001-00444 - LIFEWAY CHURCH Apnl 24, 2002 Page 2 e The Hillside Residential Development Regulations regwrement fora 30-foot maximum building height is intended to minimize adverse impacts on viewsheds and grading, while allownng for reasonable development of land, and f The proposed sanctuary structure height is necessary to accommodate proper mtenor dimensions for aesthetic and acoustical purposes, and g The proposed walls, consisting of a mawmum 15-foot retaining wall wnthin the east parking lot, is needed to provide ample on-site parking and adequate drainage for the site, and h Because the drastic topography of the sde does not equally impact most properties in the same distract, the granting of the Vanance will not set a precedent, and i Granting of the Vanance wall not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare, but conversely, well provide adequate parking and an adequate mtenor environment for patrons of the church 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the speGfied regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistentwdh the objectives of the Development Code, in that the bwldmg height restnctions of the Hillside Development Regulations, applicable to residential construction, would prevent the church from achieving an adequate mtenor sanctuary environment b That there are exceptional or extraordinary Grcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distract, in that the site slopes steeply from north to south and is subtect to speual height restnctions intended for single-family homes. c That stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprave the applicant of pnvileges entoyed by the owners of other properties in the same distract, in that there are many other churches with generously sized sanctuanes located insingle-family distracts d That the granting of the Vanance wall not constitute a grant of speGal pnvilege inconsistent wrath the limitations on other properties classified in the same distract, in that it is common for churches to have sanctuanes with high ceilings, and the applicant has carefully designed the building to comply wrath all other Hillside Residential standards e That the granting of the Vanance well not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the wGmty, in that the Vanance represents the minimum necessary height increase to provide an adequate intenorenwronmentarad only a portion of the bwldmg height v~nll exceed the height limit '(~-l- C -1 to PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-44 VAR DRC2001-00444 - LIFEWAY CHURCH Apnl 24, 2002 Page 3 4 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below 1) Vanance approval shall expire if bwldmg permits are not issued v~nthin 5 years from the date of approval 2) The wall shall be constructed with a textured plaster color to match the on-site buildings and decorative plasters In addition, climbing vines are regwred along the south face of the wall Construction of the wall shall be subtect to City Planner review and approval 3) All applicable Conditions of Approval per Resolution 02-43 approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 shall apply 5 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich MaGas, Vice Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of Apnl 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT• COMMISSIONERS ~jd C1-1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH Apnl 24, 2002 Page 4 13) The applicant shall add a detail cap at the top of the stacked stone pilasters proposed on the retaining walls located in the east parking lot, subbed to City Planner review and approval 14) The applicant shall provide a 6-foot high decorative wall (to match the proposed east parking lot retaining walls) along the southern end of the south dnve aisle, terminating at first parking stall of the east parking lot to screen on-site vehicular traffic light glare and noise from existing single-family residences to the south 15) Reduce the proposed grade from 2 percent to 1 percent at the southeast comer of the property to eliminate the necessity of a single large retaining wall, and incorporate terraced retaining walls, subted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Engmeennq Division 1) Missing improvements along Vineyard Avenue shall be installed mcludmg, but not limited to, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, signing, stnping, dnve approaches, etc ,and as regwred Vineyard Avenue is a City'Colledor Street' 2) Calle del Prado cul-de-sac shall be fully constructed with curb and gutter on the north side, curb and gutter and sidewalk on the south side, dnve approach, streetlights, street trees, signing, stnpmg, etc , m accordance with City "Local Cul-de-Sac," 36 feet curb to curb, and a 60-foot nght-of-way Dedication of nght-of-way is regwred (30 feet from the existing centerline to southerly nght-of-way) The cul-de-sac needs to utilize the existing nght-of-way 3) Water runoff from Calle del Prado will not be allowed to dram through the dnveway to the parking lot 4) Commeraal dnveways on Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado shall be 35 feet minimum per City standard 5) Overlay Calle del Prado 0 10-foot minimum, mcludmg the north side of the street as directed by the City Engineer 6) Complete the north side curb and gutter of Calle del Prado with the phased development for the gymnaswm or the education bwlding, whichever comes first Environmental Mitigation Arr Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 ~3 • c 53 Apri120, 2002 The City Qf Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 To Whom it May Concern Our property is adjacent to theproposed Lifeway Chwch on Vineyard and Calle del Prado in Rancho Cucamonga. We have viewed the plans and spoken with Kart Coury but are unable to attend the meeting held next week as we will be out of town We have a few concerns we would hke to be ~eard and addressed 1 What types of trees will be planted along the perimeter by our property We would like to see sometling that is amadive and provides somewhat of a bamer but doesn't hang over onto ow side or make too much of a mess 2 We have spoken with the engineering department but still have concerns about the drainage down the hill onto the street It seems that m heavy ram, the street could become flooded because of the excess watershed 3 The color of the proposed building seems rather bright. We would prefer to see something that blinds with the surroundings better- more of an earth tone 4 Forty-five feet lugh, even atjust one end, seems excessivegroen the height of surroundig homes and the view that it would block Since thirty-five feet is the standard, why is rt necessary to provide a variance and let them build it so lugh~ We appregiate you addressing these concerns Sincerely, , ._.,= Charles Rich and Barbara Rich ~~ ~jQ '~~ ~ S'~ , ~v~,r~c,Cir~camand~~+~ ~,~~ ~(7~ U G APR 2 3 2002 '~~ ~'C LG~? ~,j ~UG ~ // __ / > -~ ~ ~.~-c~ ~~ ~ ~ Wes-- ~d~f.~`-~ ~~~~ ~ q [~,~ ~ P~ s / p }'LCS~C Cis ~ li' i 7 ~ .~ t f3 ~~ ,~ y, 7~0 1-~~' '~ ~~ aP~ 2 ~ zoez .. _ . .~,~ T H E C I T V A N C 11 0 C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE Apnl 24, 2002 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY Kirt A Coury, Associate Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15802 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DEPARTMENT - A request to subdivide 4.24 acres of land in the Estate Residential District (1 dwelling unit per acre) into 4 parcels (3 parcels for single-family residential development and 1 parcel to be dedicated for a fire station), located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5844 East Avenue - APN 225-122-63 Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00065 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00066 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00065 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT - A request to construct a fire station on 1 08 acres of land located in the Estate Residential District (1 dwelling unit per acre), located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5844 East Avenue - APN 225-122-63 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15802, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00066 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zornng• North - Vacant, Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, Estate Residential (1 dwelling unit per acre) East - Vacant, Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Estate Residential (1 dwelling unit per acre) B General Plan Des_ianations i North - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) ITEMS D & E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM15802 AND DRC2002-00065 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT APRIL 24, 2002 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics The site is currently a lemon grove and is relatively flat, typically draining toward the south Eucalyptus tree windbreaks are near the north, south, and east boundaries of the property Lemon groves border the site on the west, with asingle-family residence further to the west. Land to the north and east has been approved for residential subdivision as Tentative Tracts SUBTT16113 and 16114 respectively, however, the properties are currently undeveloped. ANALYSIS. General: The parcel map proposes subdivision into four lots (three parcels for single- famdy residential development and one parcel to be dedicated for a fue station) The three residential lots will take access through the approved subdivision to the north (Exhibit "B"). The protect will construct a striped Class II Bike Lane on the shoulder of East Avenue The protect is located within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay, hence, is regwred to provide local feeder trails (private equestrian easements), which provide access to the rear of each lot. The average lot size is 42,329 square feet and is large enough for horse keeping The proposed equestrian trail layout includes a local feeder trail to the rear of each residential lot, as well as along the east and west perimeters of Lots 2 and 4. The proposed 8,873 square foot, single-story fire station will take access off of East Avenue and will house four personnel and three engine bays (Exhibit "C"). A small conference room is provided as a public meeting room. Eight on-site stalls are dedicated for visitor parking. Drainage is provided within the site The proposed fire station building will be self suffiaent with independent access, parking, and utility services. Finish materials for the proposed bwlding exterior include exterior plaster texture, wood outriggers, posts and fascia, real aver rock wainscot with apre-cast concrete cap, and a concrete file roof (Exhibit "D°). The parking regwrements for the fire station were based upon a 24-hour shift consisting of 4 firefighters. The following summarizes parking spaces provided• Number of Spaces Provided Visitor 8 Personnel 9 Total Spaces 17 A. Design Review Committee The Design Review Committee (McNiel, Stewart, Fong) reviewed the protect at their April 2, 2002, meeting (Exhibit "H") The Committee recommended approval of the protect with conditions B Gradino and Technical Committees• The Grading and Technical Review Committees reviewed the protect on April 2, and 3, 2002, respectively Both Committees recommended approval with conditions. C. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the protect on April 10, 2002, and recommended approval subtect to conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval (Exhibit "I") ~~ ta, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • SUBTPM15802 AND DRC2002-00065 - CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT APRIL 24, 2002 Page 3 D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant. Staff completed Part II of the Initial Study (Exhibit "J") and the Environmental Checklist Staff determined that the project could have a significant adverse environmental impact on short-term air quality during site preparation, such as grading and egwpment exhaust. Mitigation measures will be regwred to reduce impacts to short-term air quality, biological resources caused by tree removal, and exposure to hazards because of an above-grade fueling station The mitigation measures will reduce these impacts to a less than significant level If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dadv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 600-foot radws of the protect site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15802 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00065 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, i~~ Brad Buller City Planner BB:KC:mlg Attachments. Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit "B" -Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15902 Exhibit °C" -Fire Station Site Plan Exhibit "D° -Elevations Exhibit "E" -Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F° -Floor Plans Exhibit °G° -Landscape Plan Exhibit "H" -Design Review Committee Minutes dated April 2, 2002 Exhibit "I" -Trails Advisory Committee Minutes dated Apnl 10, 2002 Exhibit "J" - Intial Study Parts I and II Draft Resol ution of Approval with Conditions for SUBTPM15802 Draft Resol ution of Approval with Conditions for DRC2002-00065 i 'j~ ~ E 3 Location Map D 1C ''' ~o ~rrrR ~~ SUBTPM15802 N DRC2002.00065 0 480 960 Feet TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 15802 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL I, PARCEE MAP No S]11 PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOON ZB Of PARCEL MAPS, PAGE ]], RECORDS Of THE COUNTY RCCORDER Of THE ~ IHE COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO IN THC STALE Of CALIFORNIA 24th STREET (WILSON AVENUE) V ~ ~ _ _ .. l J '~ I ~ I llrl I) ~I _ _~ ~; ~' ~ T;=N7~71VE ' 'TaACT ~ a III _ ;-16113- - ilr,1, ~'I - - -: .~}~: i _ I ~ _•, r _ _~ "~ "s_., ii ~, _ __ _ ill ' r (:~~, i,7 , '~i.__ 21. 22 I I - _ _.'s3_ 1______ __~~'~ 'TIL '_ ___ ~_ T %'_ _ '~,1~~' 1i ( I{. n trio uriur r________ .. s r le irnd fua usswxY _ LA•+TVP RMnrtrt w nrllfww II I . I -~.'"~iu~ii~ Yirnrfrllel__ .I~~_ ICI ~`~ II /\ f 1 ~ '~[__] if rym f p x mr m [ n x snw -- Tt' LO `' !! - -- xr - __ I .1 ~A" I. ~ iRa u91R0 !__ ' ~Iw'~'~~•„! -"e ' ~ A Jlt , A _ >"~` ~ J' ., ... ' I 7..,1 ~ x pA i,~.t58 `_~_ ____ !~ I _r.1 ~~ ym r FL> 1\]~ irro ~ ! ~ I ~\ ~_ 7~ T w I~~F • nnei'c Iwo ~~ '~ rh t l-Il ~'^.,__~.:,` ~~~, ,,~_7 ~~' Par el 3 i~:'~'I, t r ',a.„Ln f.r~,. A r, .+" ~" ,i. rrl I ~' ST '~FUI y ! a ) "ER14 {ng Res(dehc[L 1 I,I ^, ~ J!' ~ et . s ~ ~, '• ~. A io ~ 17 j '. ~ _ .,, _ 43~~6 95 sq Ifl F ~' l "" ' ,,rr_ T~ 16 _ I ~ r . ,7 ~~ a r /. a_ `-_. :_ .. r Parcel 4 r- , , ~- 000~~~~~~ r ~ \ h0 . f "'1~ E _ ;~ ! - - I X1,1 _ _ ~ I I- r`" ; `' ` ~ 89 Acres m-• ~~ ca\~ 0 ~ _- ~. i ~ ' Pnrlel I / ~ /,( ~ era, VACANT .-k`-- 4 S !" Pas 4i~ yd ~~ , ' r) n ,- • I Fire_SlDllo ~ S I ~ r' r 15 r 44552 09 s tt t,'r - ~~ "~ I H ~ I r ). db see : M1R ~ s J r{ ~ - i' r i U I 1 023 Acres` ~A IL l 'r! ~+ ~ r 132 BAS ~,C`~~ ~ ny 049 89' aq fl ~ I ~ A =sl'4 r ~ i.'g ~ i ' ~`~-r-w-~~(~ ~ 8 Q ~`'10NA1'3 POroel; ~ 1, r _ ~ l I ~; r rl ~60 ~eros ' r I j ~ r III / ~ ,~, .' ~ ~~r~~ _.f~lt".` p') '•`"~ ~,.`, VACANT ' ~ ,_''j .r-'~/~~ 1~+`' _~ Il y)1~~; I I` ,)I' L=--' ` ~ ~1 L- ) .y~~i 346I6~9'4 sq tl 'l~~ri ! -' ~i i !•~ II(~ 1 I '~9 . d rm.n rw ~ ..B ~ (f'B r0 751 Acres Tsp. 1 ;. _t I r? N~{ ' 0 _ _ ~' r._ ~ ~ f ! I I' ' xfnf~_t'__~`_~I_=-m~___xN~aw`f nrf_- - I xsnw true-_:.r _~!z_____[tOtn ~JU.IT ______ ,r I% m '+ ~ J ,. urm°t qua {~ vn i"t LTr _r . _ r...n wr,b ~ ~ ..' t ~ B • I , L R w . 9 ~Ow _ _ _ T I ~- ~ ~ I ~C _ ~ ~ ~ _ 6 ; I i I:. ( 6 .. I .. I II ©e~ v~ ~i i:.rniB O' li. ~~<°e~' ~ . _ ` / r I r~ sL_ 1~1i 18 it-i° uulH.,o~~ . a.llin _'n w~Klh ~R X15 _ r ' i ~N 'L~ .__ ' ~~~~~.. - _ R~ rll !1 1 ', l4 C ' ~r ~ ~ ~ I W[¢w I ~ e '~ r 'V'I 1. ~~ ~ ~~ ` II r ~I iIr nr' ~" .. i I i9_ I ~ ~ _ „ _ I _ 3ti\3,31~~POteS a i _' - l / ~ i _g r! i i, ~ V~ r 70 Mil _, - P~ \0pb23g ~ ! ,- I - I _ . " _ '9UlE. ='Jy]~I IL j,{ u ! •1 ~. Y=50 ~i I i I tx y, l (; SECTION A-A ~~ BECTIO~~_- H-RB-R - ~ FIEC2ION ~ C~ C ~ ~ I r ~~ )l r~~ ~I ' li I .__..-_._.._.__.._p.-.._.. ..-.._._-.. _ ._ -~- __ -_ --~-` •_ _- -___ `_' ~ = 23rd , CT- ,- (FUTURE)--- ______-_ ~ _ _ <!-.ry.«4'lr--1''~~ 1', I- _~ - I~.__ -_____ _ - ____ _ __ -___ ________ _ ~ ____ Ilrll ,+n ~w PROlECI' HENCHl1ARK Prv w xuCM p,u,q`i ![ ~w.nw ,p IMIp wzomrxw r rms x ta.lxne ruw.u an lrn~. rao~Raf VICINITY NAP sHe i 4 d 3 ur~ fr ~ ruruY 3.wa sinRi / Y Y uM. .ww.rz uraoa w r .. ~` 3 ° € ,+~ 5 01fNER FE$ NGINCMLE ]a.. F/Si I.VENrI( RNIL110 CUfwNyIW G Y1>]9 20NING FMISIIHC IONINf mA18 RmonmAr. nmia w w ii fmx jo. D~ GN~%ro & Y~ssonain J I w'r qom =ti~-~'+- EAST AVE TYPSCAL HECI'ION ~ ~ ~' 3 ~ ~~ ~ .~ j ~ I „- ~ ~_ I 1 ~,:_ j ~ I'D' STREET (FUTUR 1 ~ ,~.4 ' ` ~' _ ;~„ I ,_ _ -_~__°°__ ~~ ~~ ;' ~._ r ~~ I~ gm it i ;~, -~ S i>yz II ~~: o- k ~~ .- ~ I ~ .. _ _ _ 4 EAST_AVENUE _ ~ b 9 O + V 9, ~a" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ y ~ ~ N ~('~~ Etiwanda =___ =. = ~-- Fire Station No. 176 --_ _ ; _= r ~ 6000 East Avenue _ _. . =. /1 es C \ Rancho Cucamonga. Ca 91739 l l U ~ ~ 0 a~ seas vo voNOwvono 0 anrr~nv isva soe 81l 'ON NOIlV1S a e +¢ ~~ .~ e~ a z 0 i; ~ ~~' ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~' ~' x~ a a '~~ ° ~ I~ ~~ Q a" ~~~ ~ ~~ `~ ~ ~ ~ aoa~ a = as ~ 0 A b T, ~ e t.~ 3 ~G ~ 7~ ~ @. g I r"~ ~J J~p a I ~~s i z z F a i w D£ E~ e e a ~ °I Y~ ~ FI I¢ a I} ®, s d~ ~~ ~ ~~ p p R B ~~R S ~..~, 6 , \ `,~ ~~ ~. 4~E9E _ nn ^\ l- K s __ \ , e =~ ~ x~_===-=_- ~, ~ \. 6 ~ -T---' ^ ~ \~ \ r ~+ 1 6 ~ --- ~ C] - , I .1 \ ~ ~9'I __` ~1 \ 1 iL _ - ~ ~ I \ I 1 ' T'~ ~ ` i ~ \ ~ '` j ~ 0 l ~ I J i ~ ~ I~ - ~~ ~, ~~ , ~„ , ~ , z \ t ~ ` \~ \ i \` ------~~-----L- _ ~ i' g~joe a q ~~ 5 7 ~'tl ~6~5~~ ~. I i Ol ,~ . J-i _--~ ~ {~ .~ ~~J _ \` r ~'(~ ( ;_~ ~ tJ } Lam` :~I i r r' ~' -,r ~;~~~ «---' ~~ --~'~~-~~-,,~;, -~,, U _ _ _ 6£Ll6 PJ 'e8uowe~ oy~uey anuany 7se3 pgpg % . ~~~ 1 N n t „ a @ ~ ~ ! 6 alia g B r ~ S ~ @ @ ~ ~ z ~ ~ RB $ s 5 @~ 1 5 ~ y ~j ~4 x - ^ - A __ _ S2 i ~ M i = o p 6 Z ~ ! i eo. ® a C~ a 0 e ~ , ~ ,, ~ ~ 5 a ~ ~ ~ p e1 A p ° Z ~ ' a a ae n ae ^ - S - p m ! o-__ _- 1 I I i I ~T -~~ _ _ _! _ ~- - - - - ... __ I - _ _ ; I ~ I ! I i ~i ' _ _ _ i ~ _~ I ...~ l I . " _ n I - ~ _ p ® ~! i i. ~i .I I I ~' - ~~ _-_ o I __ _-_ i _ ~• ~ ~ O - I .~ ~ i . 4 I ~ ` I I . ~ - - I '~® ' Y .. __ ~....._.........__: ~ ._. Y ~__-_ - _________ ! ~ / ~ / ` R ~ ~ I ~ % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ` J ~ Y'/ \S ~ I ~ ..~-_ -__ _-____ ~`~ _1.. ___.._- ~ 5 t , R • i ~ 0 ~© ~ I I I I . ~ ~ .~ y.c....__._ . __. F ~ _ .._____ ____.}____~ ~ I 1 1 I I I t ~~ " -r - ~ F ~E _ _ _ ~U _ _ __ 6£L l6 0~ 'opuomi;3 __ - __" anuany ;so3 0909 _ _ __--` 9L L ~oN uol~o~s a.ll _--_-- __:_-_ DpUDMI~~ ,,,s 5? ~a ~~~~~~ sib ~NJ ~yy: ~ ~~a a $$ $$~ ~ wQ e~ 6 ~ ~ ?~dea tp0 a~ P ~ t - k tl ~ ~ ~ 3 a w o ~~ ~ ~~ _ ~~ a ~~ 3 37 6~ 15Y z , 3 ~ d¢ ~ $~~~~39~~n ~ ~ ® ~'' •~ ~ n i DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS . 7 30 p m Kart Coury April 2, 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00065 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT - A request to construct a fire station on 1 08 acres of land located in the Estate Residential District (1 dwelling umt per acre) on the west side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5844 East Avenue APN 225-122-63 Related files Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15802, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00066 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15802 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DEPARTMENT - A request to subdivide 4 24 acres of land in the Estate Residential District (1 dwelling unit peracre) into four parcels (three parcels forsingle-family residential development and one parcel to be dedicated for a fire station) located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5844 East Avenue APN 225-122-63 Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00065 and Tree Removal Penrnt DRC2002-00066 Design Parameters The site is located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5844 East Avenue The site of the proposed fire station is 1 OS acres and squared-shaped It is bounded by East Avenue on the east and extends 180 feet to the west, it is over 240 feet north of 23rd Street and extends north another 240 feet The site is currently a lemon grove and is relatively flat, typically draining toward the south Eucalyptus tree windbreaks are near the north, south and east boundaries of the property Lemon groves border the site on the west, with asingle-family residence further to the west Land to the north and east has been approved for residential subdivision as Tentative Tracts SUBTT16113 and 16114 respectively, however, the properties are currently undeveloped The parcel map proposes subdivision into four lots (three parcels for single-family residential development and one parcel to be dedicated for a fire station) The three residential lots will take access through the approved subdivision to the north The fire station will take access off of East Avenue and will house four personnel and three engine bays A small conference room is provided as a public meeting room Eight on-site stalls are dedicated for visitor parking Drainage is provided within the site The proposed fire station bulling will be self sufficient with independent access, parking and utility services Finish materials for the proposed bulling exterior include exterior plaster texture, wood outriggers, posts and fasaa, cultured stone wainscot with apre-cast concrete cap, and a concrete tale roof Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect Replace the proposed cultured stone wainscot with real river rock consistent with the Etiwanda Speafic Plan design guidelines 2 Follow the East Avenue streetscape treatment in Etiwanda Speafic Plan Figures 5-28 and 5-28A, as much as practical, such as using river rock planter walls and plasters r~ 3 Replace existing Eucalyptus windrows with Spotted Gum Eucalyptus per Etiwanda Speafic Plan Section 5 41 In addition, replace the proposed Magnolia Grandiflora'MatesticBeauty speaes with Red Gum Eucalyptus planted 30 feet on center per Figure 5-41 of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan „ N,. ~~~~ DRC COMMENTS CUP DRC2002-00065 SUBTPM15802 - CITY OF RC FIRE DEPT Apnl 2, 2002 Page 2 Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee wdl discuss the following secondary design issues Reduce proposed turf areas per Xenscape pnnciples, by using nver rock fields Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the protect with incorporation of the identfied modifications Design Review Committee Action Members Present Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Nancy Fong Staff Planner Kart Coury The Committee recommended approval subtect to the Matorand Secondary Issues contained in the staff comments The Committee also added the following recommendation, and modified the identified Secondary Issue as follows Recommendation The proposed raftertail beams shall be of substantial size forcharacterand proportion to the proposed bwlding Secondary Issue Landscape shall comply with Xenscape principles, with turf in front and ground cover along penmeter subtect to the review and approval of the City Planner i ~~ tc ~ a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 10, 2002, ~ 6:00 PM TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION AGENDA X Henderson X Jarek X Mitchell X Stewart X Tolstoy Dickey (Alternate) Mannerino (Altemate) Zupke (Alternate) I. ROLL CALL: X Carlson X Clopton II. NEW BUSINESS: t P ~• A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15802- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DEPARTMENT - A request to subdivide 4 24 acres of land in the Estate Residential Distract (1 dwelling unit per acre) mto 4 parcels (three parcels for asingle-family residential development and one parcel to be dedicated for a fire station), located on the west side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5844 East Avenue - APN: 225-122-63 Related Files. Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00065 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00066 ACTION: The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to modification of recommendations 1 and 2 as follows: 1. Provide a street crossing on the east and west sides of the proposed cul-de-sac of future "D" Street to connect to the proposed Private Trail Easement of the approved tract to the north. 2. Provide a vehicle gate with side step-thru for horse access at the street entrance per City standard. 3. Perimeter walls shall be located on the inside edge of the local collector trails with 2 rail fencing required on the outside edge. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION IV. ADJOURNMENT p~ ~ - 3 r •~~ •• Meeting adjourned at 6 37 p m. - ~, Cny o/Rancho Cucamonga Planning Omsron (909) 477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL • INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that d rs the responslblldy of the applrcant to ensure that the application rs complete at the bins of submittal, City stag will not be evadable to peAorm work requued to prowde m/ss/ng information Application Number for the pro/ect to which this Conn pertains Pro/ect New Fire Station Tdle Name 8 Address ofpro/ect Rancho Cucamonga Fire Station No. 176 owner(s) 6060 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10500 Civic Center Drive / P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Name & Add2ss of developer orprolect - sponsor Fire Chief Dennis Michael 10500 Civic Center Drive / P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Contact Person & Add Fire Chief Dennis Michael ress 10500 Civic Center Drive / P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 • Name 8 Address o/person preparing this /orm (d different from above) Ke 11 10470 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Needham Telephone Number (909) 987-0909 Ext. 2240 Inlormahon rnd~cated by asterisk ('J rs not 2gwred otnon-conshuchon CUP~s unless otherwise requested by stall '1) Provide a /ull scale (&1/Z x 17) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which rnGudes the proled ste, and rnd~cate the site boundaries 2J Provide a set o/color photographs which show representahve views into the site hom the north, south, east and west, views into and hom the site hom the primary access points which serve the ste, and representative views of s~gnficant features hom the site Include a map showing location o/each photograph 3JProlectLocahon(descnbe) The project site is located between 24th Street and Summit Avenue along East Avenue. The adjacent parcels are empty lots zoned for residential development. The project parcel is scheduled for subdivisions into four lots with one dedicated for fire station. 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach add~honal sheet r/ necessary) 0225-122-63 See attached Parcel Maa 'S) GrossSrteArea(ac/sq ftJ Entire Parcel = 3.886 acre Fire Station ~6) Net Srte Area (total site size minus erne of public streets & proposed ded~cationsJ N/A 7JDescnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the pro/ect site (attach add~honal sheet d necessary N/A ~~ E l5 8)Include a descnphon o/all pennrts which will be necessary /rom the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga and other govemmental~ agenaes m order to Tully implement the protect Conditional Use Permit Fire Department Tentative Parcel Map Building Department Grading/Street Improvement 9)Descnbe the physical setting of the site as it exists be%re the pmlect including information on topography, sod stabddy, plants and animals, matun: trees, tracts and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any exishng sWctums on sde (mcludmg age and condd~on) and the use o/the shuctums Attach photographs of significant features described In adddion, sde all sources o/informahon (i e, geological and/orhydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies) The existing parcel is an undeveloped land with one residential building. It is proposed for subdivision into four separate lots with one dedicated for fire station. The adjacent parcels are empty lots zoned for residential development. See attached Soils Report, Arborists Report, and Environmental Site Assessment. 10)Descnbe the known cultural and/orhistoncal aspects o/the sde Sde all sources ofinlormabon (books, published reports and oral history) None r~ ~J p~~ tc~ 11)Descnbe any norse sources and therrlevels that now affect the srte (arromft, roadway norse, etc) and how they wdl affect proposed uses None 12)Descnbe the proposed protect rn detail Thrs should provide an adequate descnphon o/the site rn terms o/ultimate use which wdl result from the proposed protect Indicate r(then: a2 proposed phases for development, the extent ofdevelopment to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each rncmment Attach add~t~onal sheet(s) r/necessary The project parcel is proposed for subdivision into four lots with one lot dedicated for fire station. Street D is proposed as the primary for the rear lots. The fire station will house four personnel and 3 engine bays. A small conference room is provided as public meeting room. 8 on-site stalls are dedicated for visitor parking. Drainage is provided within the site. 13)Descnbe the surrounding properties, rncludmg information on plants and animals and any cultural, hrstoncal, or scenic aspects Indicate the type o/land use (msrdenbal, commeroral, etc), intensity o/land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, depaRment stores, etc) and scale of development (height, hostage, setback, mar yard, etc ) The adjacent parcels are empty lots zoned for residential developments. 14) Will the pmposed pro/ect change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general ama of the pro/ec[~ The pattern will change from an empty lot into a developed site. The General character of the building will reflect the surrounding develoment. 15)Ind~cate the type o/short-term and long-term nose to be generated, mGudmg source and amount How wdl these noise levels allect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods o/sound proofing are proposed Short-term noise -project construction Long-term noise -none '16) Indicate proposed removals and/orn;placements o/mature orscemc frees N/A 17) lnd~cate any bodies o/wafer (mcludrng domestic water supplies) mto which the site drams N/A 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Res~denhal (gal/day) Fire Station 600 peak use (gaUDayJ 1, 200 b Commero~aUlnd (gaUday/ac) N/A Peak use (gaUmm/ac) 19)Ind~cate proposed method of sewage disposal Septic Tank X Sewer I/septic tanks are proposed, attach peroolat~on tests I/discharge to a sandary sewage system ~s proposed md~cate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distract at 987- 2591 a Res~denhal (gaUday) Fire Station 270 b CommeraaUlnd (gaUday/ac) N/A RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number o/ n:s~denhal units Detached pnd~cafe range o/parcel saes, mm~mum lot sae and maximum lot sae N/A D~.ClB Attached (mdreate whether units are rental or for sale unds) N/A 21)Anticipated range o/sale pnces and/or rents Sala Pnce(s) $ N/A tp Rent (per month) $ to 22) Specity number o/ bedrooms by and type 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit tYPe N/A 24)Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be residing within the pro/ect Contact the appropnate School Distncts as shown in Attachment B a Elementary N/A b Junior High N/A c SeniorH~gh N/A COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Descnbe type o1 use(s) and major /unction(s) of commercial, industnal or instdubona! uses Single-storv, 4-Bedroom Fire station with 3 appartaus bays 26J Total floor area of commercal, industnal, ormstitubonal uses by tYPe .8,873 s4.ft. 27J Indicate hours of operation 24 hours 28) Number of Total employees 12 Maximum Shfi Time o/Maximum Shift 8 hours 29)Prowde breakdown of anhcrpated/ob classficabons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an md~cabon of the rate o/hue for each classnc~abon (attach add~bonal sheet d necessary) • 30) Estimation o/the number of workers to be hired that currently ms~de rn the Gty N/A '31)For cammeraal and rndustnal uses only, rnd~cate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be vended through the South Coast Air Quality Management Drstnct, at (818) 572-6283) N/A ALL PROJECTS 32)Have the water, sewer, fl2, and flood control agenaes serving the pro/act been contacted to determine their abdrty to provide adequate service to the proposed prolect~ I/so, please indicate their response Yes - new sewer line, gas line, water line, electrical and communication utilities line will be provided for the site. u D£ E zo In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals9 33)Examples of hazandous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not l~mrted to PCBs, radioactive substances, peshades and herbiades; fuels, or/s, solvents, end other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any o/the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, rf known None 34) ill the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-tens use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not l~mrted to those examples listed above? I/yes, prowde an inventory o/all such matenals to 6e used and proposed method of d~sposa/ The location of such uses, along wdh the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans None I hereby certify that the statements /umished above and in the attached exhrbrts present the data and information rnqurrod loradequate evaluabon of this protect to the best ofmy abdrty, that the facts, statements, and rn/ormation pn:sented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that addd~onal rn/ormahon may be 2qurred to ba submdted be/ore an adequate evaluation can 6e made by the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Date January 30, 2002 Signature Title cardo Godoy, Prod ct Manager D~ Ea i City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: DRC 2002-00065, SUBTPM 15802 and DRC 2002-00066 (Tree Removal Permd) 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: Development Review DRC 2002-00065. SUBTPM 15802 and DRC 2002-00066 -The proposed protect is the development of a one-story fire station building of 8,873 square feet on a 1 026-acre lot The building wtll house four dormitones and athree-bay apparatus room (housing trucks and related egwpment), a fueling station, and a small conference room for public meetings The fire station will have a parking lot adiacent to the bulding for visitor parking The protect also includes the subdiwsion of a larger 3 89-acre parcel located on the west side of East Avenue approximately 250 feet north of 23rd Street (APN 225-122-63), into four approximately one-acre lots The fire station will be developed on the parcel adiacent to East Avenue The remaining three parcels are not a part of the proposed fire station One lot is used for citrus cultivation, a second lot is developed with asingle-family residence, and the third lot is vacant Finally, the development of the fire station will regwre a permit for the removal of a number of trees and replacement in accordance with an approved landscape plan 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Fire Chief Dennis Michael 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Estate Residential (1 dwelling unit or less per acre) 6. Zoning: Estate Residential Distnct (1 dwelling unit or less per acre) Etiwanda Speafic Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 3 89-acre site is located between Wilson Avenue and Summit Avenue along East Avenue in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area The site is surrounded by vacant land to the north, south and west Lemon groves are cultivated on a portion of the site to be subdvided and to the immediate south and west The land to the north has been approved for residential subdivision (Tentative Tract 16113) To the east is vacant land that has been approved for residential subdivision (Tentative Tract 16114) A single-family residence occurs approximately 200 feet west of the proposed fire station site on a portion of the site to be subdivided The subdivision wtll separate the site into four lots, the fire station, lemon grove, single-family residence and vacant lot will all be on separate lots once the parcel map is approved 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: . City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~ ~ E a~ Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Klrt Coury, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: Permits to construcUoperate afueling station from South Coast Air Quality Management District. Approval of a Hazardous Materials Business Plan by City Office of Emergency Services and San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services Regional Water Quality Control Board permits for underground storage tanks. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that Is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. OLand Use and Planrnng ' (/) Transportation/Cuculation (/) Biological Resources (/) Pubhc Services , OPopulation and Housing ()Energy and Mineral Resources (/) ULhLes and Service Systems (/) Geological Problems (/) Hazards (/) Aesthetics / Water ( ) (/) Noise sources R e (/ t / Air Guahty / Mandato Findin s of Si nificance o r ) Re crea DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation• (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed ~ /r-• ~~~ Kirt Coury Associate Planner April 1, 2002 b~ ~a3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified PMenWlly Spniflont ~ ` Issues and Supporting Information Sources Paenbally u~ess n an , Signfimnl Mibpabon Signififant No 1 tl I IM I d I tl LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zonings () () (~) ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or () () () (~) policies adopted by agencies with lunsdiction over the prolect~ c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the () () (~) ( ) vicinity d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an () () () (~) established community Comments: a-d) The protect includes the subdivision of a 3 89-acre lot into four, approximately one-acre lots, and the construction/operation of a 8,873 square-foot fire station on one of the lots The site is located on the west side of East Avenue approximately 250 feet north of 23i° Street within the Estate Residential Distract (one dwelling unit or less per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Construction/operation of a fire station is permitted in residential distracts upon the granting of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Fire stations are allowed with a Conditional Use Permit in residential zones because of the need to provide fire protection and emergency medical services, with adequate response times, for the Etiwanda community, which is predominantly residential The Fire Protection Distnct's Strategic Plan 2000-2005 indicates the need for a new fire station in the north Etiwanda area based upon risk assessment and the General Plan Standard of Coverage The proposed fire station will be compatible with existing and proposed residential development Fire station personnel located within residential areas are sensitive to adjacent neighbors Operational characteristics as described by the City Fire Chief include a "red lights on only" policy when leaving the site during nighttime hours Sirens are generally turned on when engines are a sufficient distance from the site or if vehicles are on the roadway The similar operational procedures will be applied during the daytime hours to ensure the school, located on the northeast corner of Banyan Street and East Avenue, is not disrupted Additionally, proposed vehicle trips (including calls and visitors) will be similar to vehicle trips generated in residential development And since adjacent parcels are not being developed concurrently, future residents will be aware that they are adjacent to a fire station Given the number of employees (9 to 12), protected call volume (3 to 5 calls per D~ta~ C~ Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 day) and operating procedures, the proposed project will be compatible with existing/future residential development and middle school No increase in density or plan amendment is proposed and therefore no impacts will result from the project Polentlally Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Uncle s Than Sgnifirant MNgahan Significant No I p In tetl I C I [t 2. POPULATION ANDHOl1SING. Would the proposal. a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local () () () (r) population projections b) Induce substantial growth in an area either () () () (r) directly or indirectly (e g ,through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable () () () (r) housing Comments: a-b) The proposed fire station will employee nine firefighters in three eight-hour shifts, with facilities to allow an additional three firefighters as this portion of the City grows in the future This represents a less than significant number of employees c) The proposed project will be constructed on a vacant lot and therefore will not replace any existing housing PMenhally Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenwuy un~iess Than Significant MlhgahOn Sign~fignl No I ^ Inco tetl I C I ct 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result ~n or expose people to potential impacts involving a) Fault rupture b) Seismic ground shaking c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction d) Seiche hazards e) Landslides or mudflows~ f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill (~) U O (~) O O O (~) ( ) O O (~) ( ) g) Subsidence of the lands () () () (~) h) Expansive soils O O O (r) ~ E E as Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Polentlally Sipnifionl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polentlally Irtpaa unless Less 711an Sipnificanl Mitlpatlon Siprvfiainl No 1 a Inca lea I a I d Unique geologic or physical features Comments: U O O (~) a-b) A Geotechnical Investigation was prepared for the protect by Leighton and Associates (October 2001) The following is a summary of the findings presented in the report There are no known active or potentially active faults that traverse the site, and the site is not located within an Algwst-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, however, the site is located Yz mile from the Red Hill fault (also known as the Etiwanda Avenue Scarp) which has been shown to be active and may be a splay of the Cucamonga fault The most likely seismic hazard that could affect the site is ground-shaking resulting from an earthquake occumng along any major active or potentially active faults in southern California Regional active and potentially active faults that could produce the most significant ground-shaking on-site include the Cucamonga, Glen Helen/Lytle Creek, San Jacnto, San Andreas, Sierra Madre, and San Jose faults Table 1 identifies the faults, their approximate distance from the site, and the estimated maximum credible earthquake (MCE) Fault Name Distance from Site miles Estimated Maximum Earthquake Event (MCE) Cucamon a 1 7.0 Glen Helen/L le Creek 6 7 0 Red Hill 0 5 6 5 San Jacinto 5 6 7 San Andreas 9 8 25 Sierra Madre 8 7 0 San Jose 8 6 5 The geologist evaluating the protect and protect site used computer models to analyze the potential impacts of maximum credible earthquake (MCE) events occurring in the region Based on the analysis, the Cucamonga fault will likely produce the greatest ground acceleration at the protect site, due to its proximity to the site, fault type, and maximum earthquake magnitude of Mw 7 0. The conclusion of the geotechnical study is that the site is expected to experience strong groundshaking during the design life of the project This same conclusion is reached for most protects in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and vicinity that so close to several motor faults These are not considered to be mitigation measures because they generally apply to all development protects, except possibly redevelopment of a built site So they would likely show up in some form or another as notes on the grading plan, or lust be considered standard grading procedures In an effort to standardize these ~£ E acs Irntial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 Page 6 Initial Studies, we have chosen to treat them as standard regwrements rather than special mdigation The geotechnicai investigation included a senes of recommendations that, when implemented, wdl reduce the potential for significant impacts to occur These include, but are not limited to properly preparing the site to remove all vegetation and debris pnor to grading to remove all organic material from the site, overexcavating and recompacting site sod to create a uniform response to the applied loads, and reinforcing footings during construction These and other recommendations made in the geotechnical study, in contunction to regwrements of the Uniform Budding Code will ensure that impacts associated with severe ground-shaking wdl be less than significant c) Liquefaction occurs when loose saturated cohesion-less sods are subtect to ground shaking dunng an earthquake of large magnitude Additionally, liquefaction may occur when the water table is less than 40 feet below ground surface The geologists evaluating the protect site conGuded that based on their investigation, shallow groundwater levels have not been encountered historically near the site. In addition, Figure 51-2 of the General Plan EIR identifies only a few isolated areas in the City where liquefaction could occur These areas are located in the southeast portion of the City near Red Hdl d) A seiche is an osallation of water in a lake, reservoir, etc The protect site is not located near a body of water The nearest bodies of water are the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) reservoir located approximately'/. mde southwest of the site and the East Etiwanda Creek located approximately'/, of a mile northeast of the site Given the distance and confinement of these water bodies, development of the protect site will not expose people or structures to any potential seiche impacts The site is not within a 100-year flood plain as shown on Exhibit V- 5 of the City's General Plan e) The site is relatively flat and is not located in an area prone to landslides or mudflows f) Site topography wdl be slightly altered by grading to accommodate the protect The geotechnical investigation included a senes of recommendations that, when implemented, wdl reduce the potential for significant impacts to occur These include, but are not limited to properly preparing the site to remove all vegetation and debris pnor to grading to remove all organic material from the site, overexcavating and recompacting site soil to create a uniform response to the applied loads, and reinforcng footings during construction These and other recommendations made in the geotechnical study, in contunction to requirements of the Uniform Bwlding Code will ensure that impacts assocated with severe groundshaking wdl be less than significant The potential for erosion to occur on-site during grading and site preparation can be minimized by applying best management practices (BMPs) such as applying water to the site to reduce wind erosion, and staging sand bags or hay bales in strategic location on-site to reduce runoff dunng the rainy season Section 4 - Water, contains an evaluation of these impacts D ~ Ea'~ Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 g-h) The geotechnical investigation did not identify any areas where subsidence or differential settlement might occur on-site Recommendations contained in the geotechnical investigation and summarized in subsection b and f above, will ensure that the site remains stable during the design life of the protect i) The site contains no unique geologic or physical features PolenWlly Signifipnt Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potmhally Un~ess 71un Signifi®nt MiUgaUOn Significant No I cl In lM I ct I ct 4. WATER. Wdl the proposal result in a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, () () (~) ( ) or the rate and amount of surface water runoff b) Exposure of people or property to water related () () () (~) hazards such as flooding c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration () () () (~) of surface water quality (e g ,temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any () () () (~) water body e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction () () () (~) of water movements f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either () () () (~) through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an agwfer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater () () () (~) h) Impacts to groundwater quality () () () (~) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of () () () (~) groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies Comments: a) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new hardscape and rooftop proposed on the currently vacant site The protect is the development of approximately one acre with a fire station and assoaated parking lot The site will be graded to accommodate runoff into the nearest storm drain and will not cause an adverse impact Grading and development plans, including a drainage plan must be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, this potential impact is less than significant ~~ ~Ea $ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 Page 8 b) Based on Exhibit V-5 of the City's General Pian, the protect site is outside of the 100-year flood plain c-e) The prolect site is not located near a body of water The nearest bodies of water are the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) reservoir located approximately Y, mile southwest of the site and the East Etiwanda Creek located approximately '/. mile northeast of the site The East Etiwanda Creek contains water intermittently generally during heavy storm events As a standard condition of development, the applicant is required to provide a drainage study depicting how storm water run-off will be conveyed both during grading and construction, and once the site is developed and operating, prior to issuance of grading permits f-Q The prolect will not interfere with groundwater management practices in the area as the site is not used for groundwater recharge. ~~ PolenWlly SipNfie3nt Issues and Supporting Information Sources POtenWlly Unless 7Lh~an Sipmfiont MNgaOOn Slgrvfimnl No I tl In ted I cf I cl 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal• a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to () (~) () ( ) an existing or protected air quality violation b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants () (~) () ( ) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or () () () (~) cause any change in climate d) Create objectionable odors () () () (~) Comments• a-b) The proposed project was screened using the Urban Emission Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) prepared by Jones & Stokes under the guidance of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Distnct, the Ventura County Air Pollution Control Distnct, and the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAOMD) The program generates emissions estimates for land use development projects The criteria pollutants screened for inGuded reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrous oxides (NO,), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM,o) Two of these, ROG and NOx, are ozone precursors Though not required, construction emissions are screened and quantified to document the effectiveness of control measures (Table 1) The operational mobile source emissions were calculated using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Tnp Generation Manual 6~' edition values programmed into the URBEMIS7G model The project construction and operational emissions do not exceed SCAOMD thresholds of significance (Tables 1 and 2) However, since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) mitigation measures will be used to minimize the prolect contribution to regional emission of criteria pollutants Generally, construction of a prolect this size will not exceed SCAOMD thresholds for PM,o and NO, dunng grading activities, nor SCAQMD thresholds for developed ~~.Eaq Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 conditions (operational impacts) for NOx Table 1 shows protect impacts before and after mitigation measures have been implemented Since the site is small, grading activities will likely be completed in less than a day and will not generate significant amounts of dust emissions However, a lemon grove is currently present onsite and will need to be cleared This activity will likely take a few days and will generate dust from removal of stumps Since there is a single-family residence located approximately 220 feet west of the protect site, and since the South Coast Air Basin is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM,o) the following measures shall be implemented 1. East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 2. Grading and clearing operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour (mph) to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 3. Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Table 1 URBEMIS7G Construction Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NOx CO PM,o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Gradin 2 85 2 85 39 74 37 76 - - 14 00 6 75 Worker Tri s 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Stations E w 0 34 0 34 0 27 0.27 - - 0.02 0 02 Mobile E w 0 64 0 61 6 80 6 46 - - 0 44 0 41 Arch Coatin s 0.01 0 01 - - - - - - As halt 017 016 - - - - - - Totals 4 01 3 83 46 82 44 49 0 00 0 00 14 46 7 18 SCAOMDThres 75 75 100 100 550 550 150 150 Si nificance No No No No No No No No During construction exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment, will increase NO, levels in the area The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to sensitive receptors are at less than sigrnficant levels • 4. The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. ~ ~ E 30 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 Page 10 5. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 6. The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. As shown in Table 2, proposed operation activities at the site are significantly below SCAQMD thresholds Trips associated with the fire station will be minimal as the station will employee a total of rnne firefighters with faalities to include an additional three upon build-out of the area The station will have a maximum shift of three firefighters per eight-hour period The protected call volume for the station will be between three to five calls per day Based on three shifts per day, three firefighters per shift, three to five calls per day, and approximately four visitors per day, the station will generate between 32 and 36 trips per day Mobile emissions associated with these vehicle taps is well below SCAQMD thresholds and therefore the impact is less than significant Table 2 URBEMIS7G Operations Emissions Summary (Pounds per Day) Source ROG NO^ CO PM~o Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Unmet Met Area Source 0 06 0 00 0 81 0 00 0 32 0 00 0 00 0 00 Mobile Source 0 41 0 41 0 22 0 22 2.17 2 17 0 12 0 12 Totals 0 47 0 41 1 03 0 22 2 49 2 17 0 12 0 12 SCAOMDThres 55 55 55 55 550 550 150 150 Si mficance No No No No No No No No c-d) The proposed protect is the construction of an 8,873 square-foot fire station on approximately one acre Adequate landscaping will be provided m accordance with the City Development Code The fueling station will include two, above-grade 500- gallon diesel fuel tanks Control of objectionable odors assocated with fueling will be accomplished by state of the art pumps and nozzles The station will be responsible for compliance with SCAQMD rules and regulations for operation of the fueling station Adherence to SCAQMD requirements will ensure that the impact is less than sigrnficant The end use of the proposed project will not generate emissions that could cause climatic changes or obtectionable odors p~E31 Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Polen4ally &Bnifiont Issues and Supporting Information Sources Palent~ally unless Thin SiBnifirant MiLgaeon Signifipnt No I p In tetl 1 C I c1 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result m• a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestions () () (~) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e g , () () () (~) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to () () () (~) nearby uses d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-sites () () () (~) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists () () () (~) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting () () () (~) alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks) g) Rail or air traffic impacts O O O (~) Comments: a) Trips associated with the fire station will be minimal. The Fire Department will staff the station with nine firefighters in three shifts per day The protected call volume for the station is between three to five calls per day Based on three shifts per day, three firefighters per shift, three to five calls per day, and approximately four visitors per day, the station will generate between 32 and 36 trips per day The impact from the addition of these vehicle taps is considered less than significant b-d) Access to the site will be provided by a proposed 35-foot driveway from East Avenue Employees, visitors, and engines returning from a call will enter from this driveway Visitors will proceed to the visitor parking area located along the north side of the building (approximately 32 feet from the driveway entrance) Employees and engines will proceed around the back of the building, along the west boundary of the site to employee parking at the southwest corner of the site and to the apparatus room at the southeast corner of the site, respectively Roll up doors will be provided on both the front and rear of the apparatus room to enable engines to easily enter and exit the site The proposed design will allow full access without impeding through traffic on East Avenue as engines will have a direct route to the apparatus room and will not have to back up into the site Based on scheduled development to occur in the area north of Banyan Street along East Avenue (the fire station and Tract Maps 16113, 16114 and 16115) the City proposes to widen and make necessary improvements along East Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Improvements will ensure vehicles picking up/dropping off students at the middle school will not block emergency vehicles Upon improvements to East Avenue tF)e impact will be less than significant r1 LJ ~ ~ ~ 3a Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 e/f) The new development will not cause a hazard or barrier to pedestrians or cyclists as adequate points of ingress/egress will be provided and adequate parking will be provided onsite No bus turnouts are proposed g) Located approximately seven and a half miles northeast of Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not be dangerous to users or aircraft Potmtally Signfimnl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pnim4Clly u1fpieu Tl~n Signifi~anl Mi0pa0m Signifi,anl No I ct Into ICE I cl I p BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result m impacts to• a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their () () () (r) habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds) b) Locally designated species (e g ,heritage trees, () () (~) ( ) eucalyptus windrow, etc )~ c) Locally designated natural communities (e g , () () () (~) eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc )~ d) Wetland habitat (e g ,marsh, riparian, and () () () (~) veinal pool) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration con•idors~ () () () (~) Comments: a) The site consists of approximately one-acre of a 3 89-acre site, which consists of a citrus grove and single family residence The portion of the site that will be developed with the fire station is currently vacant Portions of the larger site and adtacent parcels to the west and south are under citrus cultivation The site and surrounding area is largely vacant with the exception of asingle-family residence that occurs approximately 220 feet west of the fire station site The area occurs outside the Delhi sands flower-loving fly Recovery Unit areas designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service as well as outside the areas mapped as supporting Delhi sods on the US Soil Conservation Service soils maps for the area. According to the Phase I Site Assessment completed for the protect, the site has been a lemon grove since at least 1938 In addition to lemon trees, the site includes eucalyptus windrows around the perimeter of the property and some additional ornamental vegetation No natural habitat remains on-site b-c) There are presently onsite 47 Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), Blue Gum trees planted in windrows near the north, south and east boundaries In December 2001, Knapp Associates prepared a Preliminary Arboricultural Report for the site The report concluded that of the 47 Blue Gum trees present onsite, most were not suitable for retaining, and were recommended for removal and replacement The ~~E33 Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit and will pay appropriate fees prior to removal The Etiwanda Specific Plan allows removal of windrows subtect to replacement with Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) The preliminary landscape plan for the site indicates that 52 trees will be planted onsite Since the trees will be replaced the impact is considered less than significant d) There is no riparian or wetland habitat on-site e) The site is disturbed and includes an existing lemon grove Development in the viamty includes residential development to the west, and a park and school to the southeast This surrounding development has eliminated any wildlife corridors that may have occurred in the past PWenWlly S~grofimnl Irryad Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources PoteaWlly unless Ilan Sigrofi®nt Miugaban Sigrofirant No I of In tetl I cY I cl 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation () () () (~) plans b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and () () () (~) inefficient manner c) Result in the loss of availability of a known () () () (~) mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State Comments• a-b) The protect will be required to conform with applicable City standards for energy conservation b) The protect site is located in an area classified as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ-2) An MRZ-2 zone contains deposits of known value and marketability However, the State Geologist has determined that the area is not a Designated Area of available resources due to urbanization Additionally, the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan does not identify the area as occuring in an aggregate extraction resource area (Figure IV-2, General Plan) Potentially Sigrofinnl Irtpad Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pamlally unless Than Signifi®nt NLO~bon Signifitanl No 1 cl Inco le0 I ct I cl 9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of () (~) () () hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) DfE3`} • ~J Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 PolenWlly Signifiont Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polemwllr un~ess roan S~grufipnt MrtigaLOn Signfiranl Na I ci In IM I n I cY b) Possible interference with an emergency () () () (~) response plan or emergency evacuation plan c) The creation of any health hazard or potential () () () (~) health hazard d) Exposure of people to existing sources of () (~) () ( ) potential health hazards e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable () () () (r) brush, grass, or trees Comments: a/d) In August 2001, MGE Engineering, Inc performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the protect site The protect site consists of an approximate one- acre portion of a larger 3 89-acre parcel of land Based on review of aerial photographs for the area, the site has been a afros grove since at least 1938 An interview with the owner of the property indicated that no water wells, underground storage tanks, sumps, ponds, etc were ever located on the property No on-site pestiade fabrication or storage areas were identified In the absence of such issues, lemon grove usage typically does not pose a sigrnficant environmental impact Additionally, during an on-site inspection, no hazardous materials storage or usage was noted No evidence of improper hazardous was disposal was observed, and no stained or discolored drains, catch basins, drip pads, or sumps were observed Therefore, development of the site wdl be exposed people or the environment to existing sources of hazardous materials The proposed fire station includes an above-grade fueling station The applicant will obtain appropriate permits from both the County of San Bernardino Hazardous Material Division and the South Coast Air Quality Management District prior to occupancy of the fire station 7. All appropriate permits will be obtained prior to certificate of occupancy and must be documented in a Business Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office. These safety measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to less than significant impact. • c) The proposed protect is the subdiwsion of a 3 89-acre parcel into four parcels and the construction of an 8,873 square-foot fire station on one of the parcels Development of the site will provide the area will athree-bay, nine firefighter station with faalities to add an additional three firefighters at such time as the area develops and additional coverage is regwred Improvement of East Avenue wdl include appropriate lighting, curbs and sidewalks to ensure standard emergency response times and effiaent evacuation of residents in the event of an emergency '~£ ~ 35. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 Page 15 c) The proposed above-ground fueling station will expose employees to vapors containing benzene, a known carcinogen However, due to current state-of-the-art equipment, these exposures fall below significant thresholds set by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), therefore this is a less than significant impact e) The Etiwanda area of the City is relatively undeveloped and is subject to occasional wildfires The Etiwanda area and the entire area north of the City limits are more susceptible to fires than other areas in the City due to the presence of fire-prone vegetation, less convenient access by fire fighting equipment, lack of water service and inadequate water pressure Development of the proposed project will provide a fire station in the vicinity The development will also remove vegetation from the site and extend water service These improvements will reduce fire hazards within the area Potentially Slgnifiwnl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Un~ess Tna 3iBn~fiwnt MNgahon SigNfiwnl NO I p In teE I cl I C 10. NOISE. Wtll the proposal result rn a) Increases in existing noise levels () () (~) ( ) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels () () (~) ( ) Comments: a-b) The project is the subdivision of a 3 89-acre parcel into four separate parcels and the development of an 8,873 square-foot fire station Fire station personnel located within residential areas are sensitive to adjacent neighbors Operational characteristics as described by the City Fire Chief include a "red lights on only" policy when leaving the site during nighttime hours Sirens are generally turned on when engines are a sufficient distance from the site or if vehicles are on the roadway Given the number the employees (9 to 12), projected call volume (3 to 5 calls per day), operating procedures, and general distance to potential future homes, the proposed project will not expose people to severe noise levels Potentially Signfiwnl Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenWllr Inpacl unless less Than &grufiwnl A4U~hw 5~9Nfiwnt No Ilryact Inwrpaatetl Irryatl Inpad 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result rn a need for new or altered government services rn any of the following areas s a) Fire protections O O O (~) b) Police protections () () () (~) c) Schools () () () (~) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads () () () (~) ~~ E ~~ • Comments: a-e) Fire Protection -The proposed protect is the construction/operation of an 8,873 square-foot fire station The station will provide fire protection for the northeastern most portion of Etiwanda The area is developing with residential neighborhoods east, northeast and north of the site Road improvements in the area, including the paving of the northern portion of East Avenue and the construction of streets along East Avenue leading into the proposed development, will be of appropriate widths to allow emergency access to proposed residential development Police Protection -Police Protection for the area is provided under a contract with the County Sheriffs Department The proposed fire station will include standard security devices such as onsite lighting, and locks on all windows and doors Schools -Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area The development of the site will include an 8,873 square-foot fire station The station will house nine firefighters with facilities to add an additional three firefighters upon build-out of the area The addition of these employees will not impact existing schools as the amount of total firefighters is small and will likely to be hired from within the City or surrounding communities Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 Polenbally S~gnfiranl a Issues and Supporting Information Sources PWenbally unless Th n 9gnificanl MNgabon $~gnifignl No Irtpan Incorporeted Irtpacl Ir,pacl e) Other governmental services Additional police protection is not required as the addition of a fire station will not have a substantial increase in area to be patrolled as the protect site is small, approximately one acre City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 O U O (~) Public facilities -The proposed fire station will not significantly increase traffic on adtacent streets Protected call volume for the station will be between three to five calls per day Employee trips will also be minimal as only nine firefighters will be employed at the station, with facilities to add an additional three firefighters upon build-out of the area The City will share in the cost of road improvements scheduled for the area The Impact is not considered significant Paenbany Significant Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pmenuallr unless Th Significant M~bgabon Significant No I C Into teC I cY I C 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result ~n a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations fo the following utilities a) Power or natural gasp b) Communication systems O O O (~) ~£~3'1 Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Potentally S~BnlfiLdnl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenfially un~ess TLh~an $iBmfitant MRigd4on Signifimnl No 1 tt I teE I cl I C c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution () () () (r) factlities~ d) Sewer or septic tanks () () () (r) e) Storm water drainages () () (r) ( ) f) Solid waste disposals () () () (~) g) Local or regional water supplies () () () (~) Comments: a-g) The proposed protect includes the construction/operation of an 8,873 square-foot fire station Development will extend as necessary existing systems and utilities available in the immediate area Utility systems installed to serve existing development within the area (school/park and asingle-family residence located east and west of the site, respectively), are adequate and will not require mator modifications or alterations Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler The protect will increase demand upon storm drain systems due to the increased runoff from new hardscape and roof tops proposed on the currently vacant site A Drainage Report will be required to address protected storm flows and proposed storm drain construction Drainage Plans will be included in application submittals in addition to the Final Drainage Report for City Engineer review and approval Potennelly Siprvfirant Inpact Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pmmuany unless Than S~prvfi®nt L4ugatan SigNfimnt No I d In tetl I d I h 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposaL• a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highways () () () (~) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? () () () (~) c) Create light or glares () () () (~) Comments: a-b) The protect site is located within the Estate Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Design guidelines and criteria have been established for the Etiwanda Specific plan community in order to assure that a wide range of individual development can blend harmoniously The proposed protect will be constructed in accordance with design guidelines set forth in the plan For example, construction of the fire station was designed in accordance with required setbacks, exterior elements and landscaping Exterior design elements of the station will be of an arts and crafts motif including exposed beams, stone wainscot, and wood posts The proposed fire station will have the design elements of a craftsman bungalow and will '~£~3$ t Irntial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 blend with existing residences within the vianity, and will not have a significant aesthetic impact in the area c) The protect will create new light and glare as the site is currently vacant However, on site lighting will be similar to residential street lighting and would not significantly affect sensitive receptors such as future residential development in the area To ensure the impact is less than significant, a lighting plan shall be submitted and approved by the City Council PotenWlly Sil7nifinant Issues and Supporting InfonnaGon Sources Paenballr u~~ 7tbn 9gnfimnt M~h~ban Spruficanl No I q In tetl I q I q 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal a) Disturb Paleontological resources () () () (r) b) Disturb archaeological resources () () () (~) c) Affect historical or cultural resources () () () (~) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change, () () () (r) which would affect urnque ethnic cultural values e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within () () () (~) the potential impact area Comments: a-e) The site is on an alluvial fan, an environment not generally assoaated with paleontologic resources As the site is relatively small, and has been previously disturbed by agricultural activities, the likelihood of affecting historical or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not considered significant Polmbally S19n~fi®nl Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pctenwllr un~i~ 71~n Sipnifienl hbbgaban Sipnficant No I q In tetl I q 1 q 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or () () (~) ( ) regional parks or other recreational facilities b) Affect existing recreational opportunities () () () (~) Comments: a) The station will employee nine firefighters with facilities to add an additional three firefighters upon build-out of the area The addition of these employees will not increase demand for neighborhood or regional parks as the amount of total firefighters is small and will likely to be hired from within the City or surrounding communities ~£ ~ ~~ Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 b) The proposed protect will be constructed on vacant land, which is designated Estate Residential Since the area is not designated for recreational development, the proposed protect will not affect any recreational opporturnties Potenhally Signifipnl a Issues and Supporting Information Sources PMenfially Unl eu Tl~n Sgnficant MNgaOOn Sigmfionl No 1 ci Inco letl I cl I cl 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the protect have the () () (~) ( ) potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major penods of California history or prehistory b) Short term: Does the protect have the potential () () (~) ( ) to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively bnef, definitive penod of time Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the protect have impacts that () () (~) () are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects ) d) Substantial adverse: Does the protect have () Q () (~ ) environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a) The site is devoid of structures and contains an existing lemon grove Adjacent parcels to the west and south also contain lemon groves The site and surrounding area is largely vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that occurs approximately 220 feet west of the protect site The site and surrounding area occurs outside the Delhi sands flower-loving fly Recovery Unit areas designated by 'p ~ E yo Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 the US Fish and Wildlife Service as well as outside the areas mapped as supporting Delhi soils on the US Soil Conservation Service soils maps for the area The site has been a lemon grove since at least 1938 In addition to lemon trees, the site includes eucalyptus windrows around the perimeter of the property and some additional ornamental vegetation No natural habitat remains on-site An existing lemon grove is present onsite Also present onsite are 47 Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), Blue Gum trees planted in windrows near the north, south and east boundaries In December 2001, Knapp Assoaates prepared a Preliminary Arboncultural Report for the site The report concluded that of the 47 Blue Gum trees present onsite, most were not suitable for retaining, and were recommended for removal and replacement The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit and wdl pay appropriate fees prior to removal The preliminary landscape plan for the site indicates that 52 trees will be planted onsite Since the trees will be replaced the impact is considered less than significant The site is on an alluvial fan, an environment not generally assoaated with paleontologic resources As the site is relatively small, and has been previously disturbed by agricultural actrnties, the likelihood of affecting historical or cultural resources is minimal and impacts are not considered significant u b) The Initial Study did not identify any significant short-term impacts with development of the protect site c) The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan that was recently adopted along with the certification of a Program EIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Consideration for significant adverse environmental effects of bwld-out in the City and sphere of influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted statements of overriding consideration balanang the benefits of development under the General Plan update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and statements of overriding consideration, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred d) Development of a new fire station would not cause substantial adverse effects on humans, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identified construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact However, proposed mitigation measures will reduce impacts to less than significant Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality are short-term and wdl cease once construction actmties are completed ~.Eyl t Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 Page 21 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for rewew in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (~) Etiwanda Specific Plan (Certified 1983) (~) Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan EIR -City of Rancho Cucamonga (Certified October 17, 2001) (~) General Plan -City of Rancho Cucamonga (Adopted October 17, 2001) (~) Preliminary Arboncultural Report, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Station No 176 Knapp AssoGates, December 3, 2001 (~) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, One-Acre Undeveloped Parcel, MGE Engineering, Inc ,August 22,2001 (~) Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Rancho Cucamonga Fire Station No. 176, WLC Architects, October 29, 2001 (~) Summary of Results of Focussed USFWS Protocol Surveys for Coastal California Gnatcatcher on Tract Numbers 16113 and 16114, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, May 17, 2001. (~) Results of a Speaal Status Wildlife Species Habitat Based Evaluation on Tract Numbers 16113 and 16114, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, January 15, 2001 p~l~~la Initial Study for DRC 2002-00065 and SUBTMP 15802 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that 1 am the applicant for the protect described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, 1 have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature: ,/ - n Date ~ i'-~L Print Name and Tdle: / ~~iti~) ~ ~?lr'IJL~~. ~1 ~ 1Z~~ ~1cA Cf~~~ '~~ ~ ~3 I City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration fs being circulated for public review in accordance with the CalHomia Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15802 and CondAional Use Permit DRC2002-00065 Public Review Period Closes: Apnl 24, 2002 Project Name: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Station No 176 Project Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga Project Location (also see attached map): Located an the west side of EastAvenue, north of Banyan Street at 5844 East Avenue - APN 225-122-63 Project Description: TENTATNE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15802 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00065 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DEPARTMENT-A requestto subdnnde 424 acres of land in the Estate Residential Dstnct (1 dwelling unR per acre) into 4 parcels (3 parcels for single family residential development and 1 parcel to be dedicated for a fire station) and to construct a fire station on 1 08 acres Related File Tree Removal Pennd DRC2002-00066 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine iF the project may have a sign cant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration Lased upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there s no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public reviewwould avod the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no signficant effects would occur, and (2) There s no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as reused may have a signficant effect on the environment ff adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to supportthis finding are included in the attached Inkial Study. The projectfile and alt related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. • Aonl24 2002 Date of Determination Adopted By b~~~ t RESOLUTION NO 02-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM15802, A SUBDIVISION CREATING FOUR PARCELS ON 4 24 ACRES (THREE PARCELS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND ONE PARCEL TO BE DEDICATED FOR A FIRE STATION), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EASTAVENUE, NORTH OF BANYAN STREET AT 5844 EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-122-63 A Recitals 1 The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distnct filed an application for approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15802, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 24th day of Apnl 2002, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public heanng for the above-descnbed map 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby spenrically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting on Apnl 24, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spenfically finds and concudes as follows a The application applies to property located on the west side of East Avenue, north of 23rd Street with a street frontage of 250 feet and a lot depth of 710 feet, and is presently developed with one single-family residence and ntrus grove, and b The properties to the north and east have been approved for residential development, however, the properties are currently undeveloped The properties to the south and west are currently vacant and undeveloped, and c The application allows for effinent development of the property ~nnth single-family residential development and a fire station The Fire Protection Distnct's Strategic Plan 2000-2005 indicates the need for a new fire station in the north Etiwanda area based upon nsk assessment and the General Plan standard of coverage 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the spenfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Etrvvanda Spenfic Plan, and bE E ~5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-45 SUBTPM15802 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 2 b The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, the Development Code, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and c The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and e. The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause senous public health problems, and f The design of the Tentative Parcel Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together wrath all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration (and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared incompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Division 1) The protect shall construct a penmeter decorative block wall on the north, south, and west sides of the project The wall shall be located on the intenor side of the pnvate equestnan easements and a white ~b~ E y(~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-45 SUBTPM15802 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 3 two-rad PVC fence shall be provided at the tract boundary The decorative block wall on the inside easement Ime shall include lockable 10-foot wide gates at Parcel 2, 3, and 4 Standard gates and pnvate equestnan easements should be widened to 20 feet at the entry points to accommodate vehicle gate step-through access per Feeder Trail Transition City Standard Plan 1006-B In addition, curb cuts will be required at the local trail connections to perrmt trader and equestnan service vehicles 2) Continue the Pnvate Trail Easement along the eastern boundary of Parcel 2 through the parkway of the proposed cul-de-sac of future "D" Street to connect to the Pnvate Trail Easement of the approved tract to the north SUBTT16113 3) Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00066 is hereby approved subtect to replacement planting as required by the Etrvvanda Speafic Plan 4) Provide a street crossing on the east and west sides of the proposed cul-de-sac of future "D" Street to connect to the proposed Pnvate Trail Easement of the approved tract to the north 5) Provide a vehicle gate with side step-thru for horse access, at the street entrance per City Standard Enomeenng Division 1) Install East Avenue frontage improvements in accordance wrath Secondary Artenal standards and Figure 5-28 of the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan a) Construct full width pavement west of the centerline, curb and gutter and a 5-foot sidewalk b) The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee for backbone improvements, within 19 feet of the ultimate street centerline, m conformance wdh City policy c) Install two 9500 lumen HPSV street I~ghts, R26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs, stnping, and signage as regwred 2) Provide a minimum 28-foot wide paved roadway from the existing end of pavement for East Avenue south of 23rd Street (pnvate) to the south project boundary Design the roadway to keep public drainage m the public nght-of-way v~nthout blocking access to 23rd Street • 3) Acquire half-section street nght-of-way (44 feet) for off-site improvements to East Avenue for the full limits of construction ~ y~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-45 SUBTPM15802 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 4 4) If required, obtain off-site grading permission sufficient to install East Avenue frontage improvements to the centerline and off site transil~ons to the existing end of pavement, in addition to nght-of-way suffiaent to install the above noted paved roadway 5) Dedication for a cul-de-sac bulb shall be made on the final parcel map. Either obtain permission from the owner of Tentative Tract 16113 to use the proposed design, or make the final parcel map consistent vnth a standard cul-de-sac beginning approximately 60 feet north of the north boundary An improvement certificate shall be placed on the final parcel map requinng the following upon development of either Parcel 2 or Parcel 4 a) Acgwsition of off-site nght-of-way and/or a request for condemnation b) Constrvdion of a full width local residential street (curb and gutter, pavement, and street lights) from said cul-de-sac bulb to East Avenue Provide dnve approaches, sidewalk, and street trees for Parcels 2, 3, and 4 u c) Construct East Avenue from 23rd Street to the aforementioned local residential street as follows 36-foot pavement mndth to Secondary Artenal standards with asphalt berth as needed to control drainage. Transportation Development Fee credit and reimbursement will be given for the full 36 feet Final signing and stnping to be determined by the City Traffic Engineer 6) Provide a temporary access easement across Parcel 1 in favor of Parcel 3 7) Dedicate a pnvate drainage easement along the south boundary of Parcel 1 Pnvate drainage easements on Parcels 2, 3, and 4 will be north of the pnvate trail easements 8) Install across-lot drainage facility upon development of Parcel 1 Provide an inlet fatality at the southwest comer of Parcel 1 that v~nll collect intenm surface drainage and can be extended for the ultimate condition 9) Provide a final drainage study that addresses north property line protection for all four parcels Install flood protection fatalities for the fire station on Paroel 1 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 10) If the cul-de-sac cannot be designed to drain northerly to the proposed catch basins, then provisions shall be made to take flows through the fire station to East Avenue In the intenm, flows reaching the temporary access road shall be accepted ~~EyB PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-45 SUBTPM15802 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 5 11) Improvement certificates shall be placed on the final parcel map requinng the following upon development of either Parcel 2 or Parcel4 a) Construct Area 5 Master Plan Storm Dram fatalities in East Avenue, from their existing terminus north of Highland Avenue to Summit Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in accordance with City policy The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over-sizing costs, in excess of fees, from future development within the same tributary area If the developerfads to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate b) Install local storm drams to convey all development drainage to the Master Plan Stone Drain The cost of local stone drams shall be borne by development Extend the local stone drain system as far as needed to contain 025 within tops of curbs and 0100 v~nthin nghts-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in Q10 c) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the cun'ent Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Zone "D" designation removed from the protect area A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), pnor to the issuance of budding permits for Parcel 2 or 4 A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA, pnor to occupancy of Parcel 2 or 4 d) Since Parcel 3 is already developed, pnvate trail and cross lot drainage faalities along the south boundary of Parcels 2, 3, and 4 shall be installed with the grading of either Parcel 2 or Parcel 4, whichever occurs first 12) Utility services to the Fire Station shall be installed underground Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions assotaated vnth vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 2) Grading and cleanng operations shall be suspended when vend speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes 3) Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions D~ ~ ~9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-45 SUBTPM15802 - CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 6 4) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy effiaency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction-grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications 5) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 6) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews well shut off equipment when not in use Hazards 1) All appropnate permits for the above-grade fueling station will be obtained pnor to certificate of occupancy and must be documented in a Business, Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office These safety measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to a less than significant impact 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Vice Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of Apnl 2002, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. ~£ DSO City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15802 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00065 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2. A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forrns to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the protect file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~p£>~ 51 Mitigation Monitoring Program SUBTPM15802 and DRC2002-00065 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the speafic phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forrn 6. Unantiapated arcumstances may arise requmng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Fonn will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or payfor City staff time to monitorand report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of Ume 9. In those instances regwnng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identitythe reporteras an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTPM15802 and DRC2002-00065 Applicant: Citv of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department Initial Studv Preaared bv: Klrt Courv Date: April 2, 2002 •. .. Air Quality ~ ~ .,. - :~' ': =,:i:~,.~.~YU~.,,r~,~,. n •~M ~ ' " ' „;r .^ ~t, b, ~ ` 4` * ,~ :+,~. ~*^. ~. ~,'- ~Sta ~~,tiR..S'K: r? ~~M e ,~ I x' ~.-R., ~~r F'"0rtrn , n 3r ~ -_ • --~ ~"n ""; ~ p „ .t. + . .~: .w3 k.~ ~ a.. 2 a .SM . 4j~ ~y-~q V > n ~` aa , East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review of Plans C 2 established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading and clearing operations shall be suspended CP C Review of Plans C 2 when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to mwmize PM~o emissions from the sde during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and CP C Review of Plans C 2 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall select the construction CP B Review of Plans C 2 egwpment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction-grading plans include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specifications The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CP C Review of Plans C 2 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CP B Review of Plans C 2 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use Hazards ,~, ., t - ,~ ;, ,*~ ~4~„~.,:t ' . .. :~,. ~ - •,~-. < , All appropriate permits for the above-grade fueling CP D Review of Plans B, D 3 station will be obtained prior to certificate of occupancy and must be documented rn a Business, Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office These safety measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to a less than significant impact .h V V Key to Checklist Abbreviations y'-~. ihx-T~k"ji-Y}L°C Responsible~Ferson;',,-~-~ - _-~.rl,.r".i~e"s ~`• tM YS ]5. .'fi`.R1iAW! ~ ~- MIt~ort~gFreque~cyr ~ '~Yhi> •rr"ima rvAtP\ C )Io~~ot•Veri catlo / ~ rV wY a •t{rs w~~ W« 4 aka r y~J y8anct~on ~ ~~f~"~-~ ~` Nf '~„„ x~'RS CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection e ;y , f .,c .: 1 W CP -City Planner or designee B - Pdor To ConsWcUon B -Other Agency Permit /Approval - ithhold Recordation of Final Map 2 - Wdhhold Grading or Bmldmg Pertnd CE - Gty Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWcgon C -Plan Chedc 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy 80 - Building OFFGaI or designee D - On Complegon D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Ponce Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP M• Ch .C s ~ ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM 15802 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map -Fire Station No 176 APPLICANT: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District LOCATION: West side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5855 East Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or m the alternative, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, ds agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense m the defense of any such action but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Approval of Tentative Parcel Map No 15802 is granted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00065 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Cdy Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on fife in the Planning Drnsion, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan SC-o2-o2 ,~ ~. E 55 Comolehon Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- Protect No SUBTPM 15802 Comole6on Date 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all _/_/_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as ali Uniform Bulding Code _/_/_ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised sde plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bulding permtts 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency pnor to tssuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, bwlding, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdrvtston, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of thts request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development _/_/_ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and appltcable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided for Parcels 2, 3, and 4, all trash pick-up shall _/_/_ be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view 8 Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map 9 A detailed plan for Parcels 2, 3, and 4 indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical _/_/_ conditions, fenang, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in contunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as _/_/_ veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs b Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora _/_/_ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Offiaal c Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to _/_/_ trail with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet d For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, _/_/_ at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot coral with appropriate fencing 10 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the _/_/_ egwne animals where zoning regwrements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot owners in subdroisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' assoaattons for amendments to the CC&Rs rl~' u SC-02-02 ~~.£5~v 2 Project No SUBTPM 15802 Comolehon Date 11 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the / / Homeowners' Assoaation are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering _ _ _ Divisions and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Frnal Map or prior to the issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Assoaation shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 12 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of / I all lots for Cdy Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ _ _ requirements, speaal street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing 13 For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each / / support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two %rinch lag bolts, to withstand high _ _ _ winds Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade 14 Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant / / 15 Slope Penang along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link / / to maintain an open feeling and enhance wews _ _ _ 16 On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk / / D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home _/_/_ landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Existing trees regwred to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier / / in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading _ _ _ plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted Vees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than / / 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, vrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for _ _ _ erosion conVol Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be / / continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each _ _ _ individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subtect to City Planner review and _ _ _ approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Droision 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on _/ / the perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer _ _ SC-02-02 ~£~5~ 13 Project No SUBTPM 15802 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) E. Environmental Mitigation measures are regwred for the protect The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other farms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 prior to the issuance of budding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertorinance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay far City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit F. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead sWcture shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Protect Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance S~-0z-0z ~a ~ ~ Comolehon Date -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/_/_ -/-/- Pro)ect No SUBTPM 15802 Comole6on Date Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction Ail plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (i e , SUBTPM15802) The applicant shall comply with the Latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility regwrements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Budding and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of bulding permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or motor addition to _/_/_ existing und(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees Applicant shall prowde a copy of the school fees receipt to the Buldng and Safety Division prior to permit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Bwiding Offical, after tracUparcel map recordation _/_/_ and prior to issuance of budding permits 4 For protects using septic tank facilities, written certificetion of acceptability, including all _/_/_ supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits 5 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 6 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public _/_/_ counter) 1. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for the property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Califomia Building Code for regwred occupancy separation(s) _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_ 4 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC _/_/_ Table 5-A 5 Provide draft stops in attics in line with common walls _/_/_ 6 Roofing materials shall be Class "A" _/_/_ 7 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table _/_/_ 5-A 8 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 9 Walls and floors separating dwelling urnts in the same building shall be not less than 1-hour _/_/_ fire-resistive construction 10 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906 _/_/_ ~~ Esq SC-02-02 ~ 5 Protect No SUBTPM 15802 Comole6on Date J. K. Existing Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Bwlding Code for the property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings 2 Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with the _/_/_ Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code 3 Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on bwldmg plans submitted for _/_/_ bwiding permd application Grading t Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City _/_/_ Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at _/_/_ the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of bwldmg _/_/_ permits 5 As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met _/_/_ a Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on- _/_/_S site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Diwsion prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits b Appropnate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or _/_/_ over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded tc the satisfaction of the Bwlding and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and bwldmg permits c On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the _/_/_ subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be sub/ect to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permd is requested d Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety _/_/_ Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits (This may be on an incremental or composite basis) e All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native _/_/_ grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided This requirement does not release the appiicanUdeveloper from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17 08 040 I of the Development Code i In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with _/_/_ the standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17 24 070 . sc-o2-os '~ £ ~ (00 Project No SUBTPM 15802 Comolehon Date 7 A separate grading plan check submittal is regwred for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Cahforma Registered Cavil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public faalities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 44 total feet on East Avenue M. 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City 6 The developer shall make a good Taith effort to acquire the regwred off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fad to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests requred for the improvements Such agreement shall prowde for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decdes to acqure the off-site property interests regwred in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to East Avenue Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage faalities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees ~~ SC-02-02 ~ ~ E t~ I _~ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/_/. Prgect No SUBTPM 15802 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb 8 AC Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trell Island Trail East Avenue x x e f x x Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) 5 feet wide, (f) commercial standard, (g) R26(s) "No Stopping" signs Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and Intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the CIty Engineer Secunty shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the CIty Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits regwred Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the CIty Engineer Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction protect along mator or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at Intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all comers of intersections per CIty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing CIty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to CIty Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the CIty Planner prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards In accordance with the City's street tree program SC-02-02 p£E~a Comole~on Date -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / Prgect No SUBTPM 15802 Comolehon Date 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact Laura Bonaccorsi at extension 4023 Min Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Grow Spacing Size' illy Space East Avenue Eucalyptus Camalo fore round Ulensis Red Gum 8' 30' o c 5- al East Avenue back round Gei erd Parviflora Australian Willow 5' 20' o c 15- al 'TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 6 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect • intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required N. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan East Avenue per Etiwanda Specific Plan O. Drainage and Flood Control Upon development of either Parcel 2 or Parcel 4, it shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone D designation removed from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologlc/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (CONK) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adfacent areas SC-02-02 ~9 Ec~3 -/-/- _/-/. -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- _/-/- Protect No SUBTPM 15802 Comolehon Date P. Improvement Completion 1 If the regwred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel _/_/_ map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for East Avenue improvements 2 If the regwred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel _/_/_ map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for either Parcel 2 or Parcel 4 (refer to special conditions Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel rncluding sanitary sewerage system, water, _I_/_ gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) to accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga County Water Distract (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fve Protection Distract, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is requved prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water distract within 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdivision or pnor to the issuance of permits to the case of all other residential pro/ects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved _/_/~ Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requirements that may be received from them R. General Requirements and Approvals 1 An easement for a Point use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or _/_/_ issuance of budding permits, whichever occurs first, for northerly drive approach 2 Etiwanda/San Sevatne Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan _/ /_ Drarnage Fees shall be paid pnor to final map approval or prior to budding permit issuance tf no map is tnvolved 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for _/_/ all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to buddtng permit issuance tf no map is rnvolved sc-os-os ,~d~~~ RESOLUTION NO 02-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2002-00065, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FIRE STATION ON 1 08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, NORTH OF BANYAN STREET AT 5844 EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 225-122-63 A ReGtals. 1. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract filed an application for approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00065, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 24th day of Apnl 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and conGuded said heanng on that date 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the ReGtals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on Apnl 24, 2002, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. a The application applies to property located on the west side of East Avenue, north of 23rd Street with a street frontage of 250 feet and a lot depth of 710 feet, and is presently developed wrath one single-family residence and afros grove, and b The properties to the north and east have been approved for residential development, however, the properties are currently undeveloped The properties to the south and west are currently vacant and undeveloped, and c The development of a Fire Station is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan pertaining to the provision of adequate levels of service 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a The Conditional Use Permit is consistent wrath the General Plan, Development Code, and the Etrvvanda Specific Plan, and ~£ ~CoS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-46 DRC2002-00065 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 2 b The design or improvements of the protect is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d The design of the proposed protect vwll not cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, and The proposed protect is not_likely to cause senous public health problems. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect Hell have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Decaration (and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows l J a That the Mitigated Negative Decaration has been prepared in compliance wrath the Califom~a Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Decaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that wall result if the protect is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect that are listed below as conditions of approval c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Decaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wnldlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Tale 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition setforth below Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Division 1) Walls shall comply wrath setback requirements of the Etiwanda SpeGfic Plan 2) Install the East Avenue streetscape treatment in Etiwanda Specific Plan Figures 5-28 and 5-28A, such as using raver rock planter walls and plasters, subtect to the review and approval of the City Planner ~~ E(o(o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-46 DRC2002-00065 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 3 3) Stnpe a Class II Bike Lane on the shoulder of East Avenue 4) Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00066 is hereby approved subtect to replacement planting as regwred by the Etiwanda Speafic Plan Replace existing Eucalyptus windrows with Spotted Gum Eucalyptus per Etiwanda Speafic Plan Section 5.41 5) Replace the proposed Magnolia Grandiflora'Ma~estic Beauty speaes with Red Gum Eucalyptus planted 30 feet on center per Figure 5-41 of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan 6) All pertinent Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15802 shall apply 7) Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real nver rock 8) The proposed rafter tail beams shall be of substantial size forcharacter and proportion to the proposed bwlding 9) The protect shall construct a penmeter decorative block wall on the north, south, and west sides of the protect Enaineenna Diwsion 1) Install East Avenue frontage improvements in accordance wrath Secondary Artenal standards and Figure 5-28 of the Etiwanda Speafic Plan a) Construct full width pavement west of the centerline, curb and gutter and a 5-foot sidewalk b) The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee for backbone improvements, within 19 feet of the ultimate street centerline, in conformance wrath Gty policy c) Install two 9500 lumen HPSV street lights, R26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs, stnping, and signage as regwred 2) Prowde a minimum 28-foot wide paved roadway from the existing end of pavement for East Avenue south of 23rd Street (pnvate) to the south project boundary Design the roadway to keep publw drainage in the public nght-of--way without bloclung access to 23rd Street 3) Acqwre half-section street nght-of-way (44 feet) for off-site improvements to East Avenue for the full limits of construction . 4) If required, obtain off-site grading pertmssion suffiaent to install East Avenue frontage improvements to the centerline and off site trans~ons to the existing end of pavement, in addition to nght-of-way suffiaent to install the above noted paved roadway -Lj ~ E c.'1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-46 DRC2002-00065 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 4 5) Dedication for a cul-de-sac bulb shall be made on the final parcel map Either obtain permission from the owner of Tentative Tract 16113 to use the proposed design, or make the final parcel map consistent with a standard cul-de-sac beginning approximately 60 feet north of the north boundary An improvement certificate shall be placed on the final parcel map requmng the following upon development of either Parcel 2 or Parcel 4 a) Acquisition of off-site nght-of-way and/or a request for condemnation b) Construction of a full width local residential street (curb and gutter, pavement, and street lights) from said cul-de-sac bulb to East Avenue Provide dnve approaches, sidewalk, and street trees for Parcels 2, 3, and 4 c) Construct East Avenue from 23rd Street to the aforementioned local residential street as follows 36-foot pavement width to Secondary Artenal standards wrath asphalt berm as needed to control drainage Transportation Development Fee credit and reimbursement wall be given for the full 36 feet Final signing and stnping to be determined by the City Traffic Engineer 6) Provide a temporary access easement across Parcel 1 in favor of Parcel 3 7) Dedicate a pnvate drainage easement along the south boundary of Parcel 1. Pnvate drainage easements on Parcels 2, 3, and 4 will be north of the pnvate trail easements 8) Install across-lot drainage facility upon development of Parcel 1 Provide an inlet facility at the southwest comer of Parcel 1 that well collect intenm surface drainage and can be extended for the ultimate condition 9) Provide a final drainage study that addresses north property line protection for all four parcels Install flood protection facilities for the fire station on Parcel 1 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 10) If the cul-de-sac cannot be designed to drain northerly to the proposed catch basins, then provisions shall be made to take flows through the fire station to East Avenue In the intenm, flows reaching the temporary access road shall be accepted 11) Improvement certificates shall be placed on the final parcel map requmng the following upon development of either Parcel 2 or Parcel4 a) Construct Area 5 Master Plan Storrn Drain facilities in East Avenue, from their existing terminus north of Highland Avenue to Summit Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of -p£ E t~8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-46 DRC2002-00065 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 5 permanent master plan facilities, m accordance with City policy The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover over-sizing costs, m excess of fees, from future development within the same tnbutary area If the developerfads to submit for said reimbursement agreement wnthm 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate b) Install local storm drams to convey all development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Dram The cost of local storm drams shall be borne by development Extend the local stone dram system as far as needed to contain 025 within tops of curbs and 0100 within nghts-of-way and provide a 10.foot dry lane m 010 c) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Zone "D" designation removed from the protect area A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits for Parcel 2 or 4 A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA, pnor to occupancy of Parcel 2 or 4 d) Since Parcel 3 is already developed, pnvate trail and cross-lot drainage facilities along the south boundary of Parcels 2, 3, and 4 shall be installed with the grading of either Parcel 2 or Parcel 4, whichever occurs first 12) Utility services to the Fire Station shall be installed underground Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule established bythe City to reduce PM~o emissions assoaated vnth vehicle tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 2) Grading and cleanng operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site dunng such episodes 3) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions 4) The construction contractor shall select the construction egwpment used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy effiGency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction-grading plans include a statement that all construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained m accordance with the manufacturer's speafications ~£ ~Co~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 02-46 DRC2002-00065 -CITY OF RC FIRE DISTRICT Apnl 24, 2002 Page 6 5) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or clean altemaUve fuel powered egwpment where feasible 6) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews wdl shut off egwpmentwhen not in use Hazartis 1) All appropnate permits for the above-grade fueling station wdl be obtained, pnor to certificate of occupancy and must be documented in a Business, Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the Cdy Emergency Services Office These safety measures vnll mitigate this potentially significant impact to less than significent impact 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2002 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Rich Macias, Vice Chavman Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of Apnl 2002, by the folloHnng vote-to-wit- AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS. p~ Edo City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15802 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2002-00065 This Mitigation Monitonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negatroe Declaration/Environmental Impact Report) for the above-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in perfonning monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2. A MMP Reporting Fonn will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitonng Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitonng and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the onginal authonty for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address. City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 b£ E ~ I Mitigation Momtonng Program SUBTPM15802 and DRC2002-00065 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to momtor specific mitigation activities and provide appropnate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Forrn After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requmng no further momtonng will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unantiapated circumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Forrn will be completed bythe protectplannerorresponsible City department and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is notoccumng afterwntten notification has been issued. The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require momtonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to momtor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9. In those instances requmng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building penmts. ~~ LJ ~E~-ra ~ +s s MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTPM15802 and DRC2002-00065 Applicant: Citv of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department Initial Studv Prepared by Klrt Courv Date: April 2. 2002 .. .. ... -. • Air Quality , ~ ~ '=` ~~~~ ~~,; • r ~^ ~ ~~uw~yy-r~,°x~ , 45 ~ 't 'a.;,~,;>^/y .r~ ~~ r~ ~«,~yI~~~~r~, ) `~i~;rh 52'"w ~ ~ =i~ ~ * d~~}, .~. ~k~l eJ t ~j s.. _ ~ 1~ ~ ~ 1i n J"~ ~' ~ ~ {~':].i . „ Y 3 ~W e . East Avenue shall be swept according to a schedule CP C Review of Plans C established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions p assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction Grading and clearing operations shall be suspended CP C Rewew of Plan C when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minim¢e PM s 2 ,o emissions from the site during such episodes Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and CP C Review of Plans C 2 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall select the construction CP B Rewew of Plans C 2 egwpment used on-site based on low emission factors and h}gh-energy efficiency The construction contractor shall ensure the construction-grading plans include a statement that ail construction egwpment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers' specificat}ons The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean CP C Rewew of Plans C 2 alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that CP B Rewew of Plans C 2 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use Hazards ~ ~ , ~ - ' ,~;' ;~ - N' `•~, z '~} _ •ti ~w .~~,.. ~, • r~,r. ,. ~ ,, >; , f - k..~l .~'~s >~., .~ 4 All appropriate permits for the above-grade fueling CP D Rewew of Plans B, D 3 station will be obtained prior to certificate of occupancy and must be documented in a Business, Emergency/Contingency Plan to be approved by the City Emergency Services Office These safety measures will mitigate this potentially significant impact to a less than significant }mpact . JV Q V Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ~ '~_-~~~;~ ~s:'~I;.~,:.c;„. 'IJIOnItorlnp,Fiequ'd~icjr~ ,~<, ;°r'"` aJ - yMet~i'oi!'ct,Yerificatlon~`~ x~'a+.T~~~"~A.~"-''' `~r~"~~' ~=F 1 ~ ~ '~'„ -~z' ~ 'q~. ' "" '~ ~ganCtfOnB i ~' ` ~ ~ CDD -Community Development Dvector or desi nee Y x GFf&L~T-£3~*v< htikcefiNP: A W th E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~!~ a +v~ilaikM1t ~Md~WFAh~c.h L~Ab[~eR~~i~~P^f ~,~},~'!~kuH'°,'wli~ ~ ~~ a ,. ~.~L' 1i1 +~{„~,"t [~i~~e g - i ach New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP -City Planner or designee B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit I Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE -City Engineer or designee C -Throughout ConsWction C -Plan Chedc 3 -Withhold Certificete of Occupancy BO - Building OftiGal or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports /Studies /Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating FC - Frre Chief or designee 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP d _M- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2002-00065 SUBJECT: Fire Station No 1 APPLICANT: Rancho Cucamoncia Fire Protection District LOCATION: West side of East Avenue, north of Banyan Street at 5855 East Avenue ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements Comolehon Date 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _/ / its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, partiapate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Approval of DRC2002-00065 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Parcel Map _/_/ SUBTT15802 3 A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all _/_/_ Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and vngation plans submitted for plan check B. Time Limits 1 Conddional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which _/_/_ include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan t 5~-02-oz 'D ~ E ~5 Protect N o DRC2002-00065 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner _ _ _ 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as ali Uniform Bwlding Code / /~ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall _ _ be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/ / submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of building permits _ _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/ / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ budding, etc) or pnor to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with ali sections of the Development / / Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in _ _ _ effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan for the fire station, including a photometric diagram, shall be / / reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the _ _ _ issuance of building permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adtacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required for the fire station and shall meet City standards The final / / design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subtect to City Planner review _ _ _ and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc , shall _/_/~ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All budding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination _ _ _ 11 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter If a double / / wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the _ _ adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by marl, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the protect's penmeter 12 Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link _/_/_ to maintain an open feeling and enhance views 13 On corner stile yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk / / 14 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock Other stone veneers may be / / manufactured products _ _ _ D. Bui lding Design 1 Ali roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/ protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adtacent properties and _ streets as regwred by the Planning Division Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the bwlding design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in budding plans SC-02-02 2 Protect No DRC2002-00065 E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space / / abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of _ _ _ 11 feet wide 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) _ _ _ 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per Ctty standards and all driveway aisles, _/_/_ entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home / / landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed _ _ _ landscape architect and submitted for Ctty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three / / parking stalls _ _ _ 3 Trees shall be planted to areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of / / one tree per 30 linear feet of bwldtng _ _ _ 4 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical hetght and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than / / 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for _ _ _ erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 5 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or _/_/_ greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical hetght and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted to staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 6 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / / included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and _ _ _ approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division 7 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, _/_/_ meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along East Avenue 8 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on ! / the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer _ _ _ 9 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located to public maintenance areas, _/ / the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division _ _ 10 Landscaping and irrigation of the fire station shall be designed to conserve water through the / / prtnaples of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19 16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal _ _ _ Code SC-02-02 3 ~ £ ~ `~ Protect N o DRC2002-00065 11 New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) rs required at a ratio of 50 / / linear feet per acre The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with _ _ _ the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19 08 100) G. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this _/_/ approval Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance _ and shall regwre separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs H. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are regwred for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of / / implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred _ _ _ to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719 prior to the issuance of budding permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be wnsidered grounds for forteit I. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and / / location of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead _ _ _ structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final locatron of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710 , FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• J. General Requirements 1 Submtt five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Division Project Number (i e , TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils / / report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check _ _ _~ submittal SC-02-02 4 ~ £ ~ , 1 Project No DRC2002-00065 3 Separate permits are requred for fencing andlor walls / / 4 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance _/_/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by / / the Building and Safety Division _ _ _ K. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be / I marked with the protect file number (i e , DRC2002-00065) The applicant shall comply with _ _ _ the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and alt other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availabtlity of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commeraal or industrial development or / / addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the _ _ _ established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checkrng Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Budding and Safety Division pnor to perinit issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation _/ / and pnor to issuance of budding permits _ _ 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday / / through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays _ _ _ . 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public / / counter) _ _ _ L. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the Califomia Building Code for the property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness _ _ _ 2 Provide compliance with the California Buldng Code far requred occupancy separation(s) _/ /_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC / / Table 5-A _ _ _ 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table / / 5-A _ _ _ 5 Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906 / / M. Grading 1 Grading of the sub/ect property shall be in accordance with the Califomia Budding Code, City / / Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in _ _ _ substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to _/ / pertorm such work _ _ 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at _/ / the time of applicabon for grading plan check _ _ SC-02-02 ~ ~ E 5 1 Project No DRC2002-00065 4 The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of budding _/_/ permds _ 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_!~ existing bwldings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Califomta Registered Civil Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/ / community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal _ _ encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public faalihes (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured _/ / from street centerline) _ _ 44 total feet on East Avenue _/ / 3 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated _/_1_ or noted on the final map 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delineated on _/_/_ the final map . 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way _/_/_ shall be dedicated to the City 6 The developer shall make a good faith effort to acgwre the requred off-site property interests _/_/_ necessary to construct the requred public improvements, and rf he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462 5 at such time as the City decides to acqure the property interests regwred for the improvements Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the Cdy tf the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests regwred in connection with the subdivision Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost The appraiser shall have been approved by the City poor to commencement of the appraisal This condition applies in particular, but not limited to East Avenue O. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, _/_/_ landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees r ~ f~J SC-02-02 6 ~~ ~ 8~` 1 Proied No DRC2002-00065 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & AC Side- Dnve Street Street Comm Median Bike Other Gutter Pvmt walk Appr Lights Trees Trail Island Troll East Avenue x x e f x x Notes (a) Median Island Includes landscaping and Irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) 5 feet wide, (f) commercial standards, (g) R26(s) "No Stopping" signs Improvement Plans and Construction Street Improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andlor private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being pertorned In public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstrucbon protect along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the Clty Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program -I-I- -~ I_ -I-I- -I-I- -I-I- -I-I- -I-I- -I-I- -I-I- -I-l. p£~ 81 SC-02-02 7 Project No DRC2002-00065 P. Q. areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans Install street trees per City street tree design gwdelines and standards as follows The completed legend and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the sVeel improvement plans Where public landscape plans are requred, tree installation in those The City Engineer reserves the right to adtust tree speaes based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact Laura Bonaccorsi at extension 4023 Mm Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Grow Spacing Size' Qty Space Ease Avenue Eucalyptus Camalo fore round Ulensis Red Gum 8' 30' o c 5- al East Avenue back round Gei erd Parviflora Australian Willow 5' 20' o c 15- al `TREES SHALL BE 15-GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic sods report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicdies or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill sod amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subtect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division 4) SVeet trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all protect intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commeraal or industrial driveways may have Imes of sight plotted as required Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Distracts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 2 Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan East Avenue per Etiwanda Specific Plan Drainage and Flood Control 2 Upon development of Parcel 2 or Parcel 4, d shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zane D designation removed from the protect area The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection faaldies suffiaent to obtain an unshaded "X" designation The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first A Letter of Map Revision (CONK) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adtacent areas / I -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- u SC-02-02 8 -~~ ~ ga Project No DRC2002-00065 R. Improvement Completion . 1 If the regwred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for East Avenue developments 2 If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for either Parcel 2 or Parcel 4 (refer to speaal conditions) S. Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CCWD is regwred prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district wdhin 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdroision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of ail other residential protects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subtect to any requrements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 An easement for a toint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of bwlding permits, whichever occurs first, for northerly drive approach 2 Etiwanda/San Sevame Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved 3 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to budding permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: U. Security Lighting All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell 2 Ali buildings shalt have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the bwldings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be mvandal-resistant fixtures sc-02-02 9 b f ~ % 3 -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~-~. -~-~- -~-~- / / / / -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- Protect No DRC2002-00065 V. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2 One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors If windows are within 40 inches of any locktng deuce, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used 3 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices W. Windows 1 All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locktng devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track to any manner X. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime vtstbthty Y. Alarm Systems 1 Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm d needed Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system wdl reduce the amount of false alarms and rn turn save dollars and Irves 2 Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour ShertfPs dispatch number (909) 941-1488 -~-~~ / / -~-~- / / -~_~ -~-~- -~-~ • SC-02-02 p>` E g `~ ~o ~