Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990/11/07 - Agenda PacketCITY _ COUNCIL A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7A0 pm lJovernber 7, 1990 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive n......a.,, n ................ r~nr,,..,:., moan I '._.._.... ""-........ems __ .......... ....... City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, .Noyor Pamela 1. Wright, cu~nnrmanbe. I Deborah N. Brown, Mayo. rn.rm Charles 1. Buquet. councnmemDe. William 1. Alexander, covernm.mDrr • ~ Jack Lam, Cfb Monote. James L. Markman, o~~nim.~.. ~ Debra J. Adams, ou cre.~ City OBice: 989-1831 Liona Puk: 980-3143 PAGE City Council Agenda Nocambar 7, 1990 1 1111 itpa aubei6ted for the Cit] Council Agenda nuot be in writing. The dpoline for auWittinq thpa itps is 5:00 p.a. oa the Wedneeda] prior to the opting. The Cit] Clerk'a Office racai~u all ouch itpc. .. Roli Caii: Buquet _, Aiexendar _, Stout _, Brown _, and Wright _. 1. Preeantat LOn of Youth Drug Free Pledgee. 2. A Proclamat sort to zecogn iza the wpk o! November 18 - 25, 1990 ac Rancho Cucamonga Family Week. 3. Pzeeantation to eettymaryp Nill for over twenty years of eervica as a crouinq guard in Rancho Cucamonga. Thin Sa the tip and place Tor the gperal pabllc to •ddraaa the C1t] Comcil. Et•te law prohlbita the Ci!] Gmcil frw addraaaiag •n] !a•¢e not pawioual] included p the Agenda. Tne C1t] ComC1A p] receive te•tiaon] and ae! the Attar for a oubaequent gating. Coapats an Lo M liaitad !o fig Ninuba par indlddual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Conant Glandaz itpa •u axpecLW to Da routine a¢d non-co¢trovenial. Thy will M acted upon b] !ha Council •t one tip witbou! discussion. An] itp e•] be rpored b] • CopcilNaeWr or eeaber of the •udUnce for diwuuion. 1. Approval of Mlnutee, September 26r 1990 October 3. 1990 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/10/90, 10/17/90, 10/24/90, end 10/31/90 end Payroll ending 10/11/90 for the total aawunt of $2,767,819.24. I PACE Clty Council Agenda November 7, 1990 2 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sala Beer 6 Nine i 22 1 I Eating Place for soup Plantstion, Rrooke 6 Mack, it ~ i incorporated P-12 San Dlsgo, 8966 Foothill Boulevard, t I ~ i~ Suite A. I 'I I 4. Approval of the Storage Area Allocation Procedure and 24 I ~ '~, 'I, ~ Fee Matrix ae approved by the Park and Recreai ion ' ~ ' ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ CoonleeSOn. ~I i ~ i ~ I '~ ~~ 5. Approval to adopt a coat analysis polity regarding 27 ' II I i public facilities. (COatlnued ton Oetober 17, 1990) I I " i R850LUTTON NO. 90-431 ~ I 28 I ~ I A RESOLUTION OP TNH CITY COUNCIL OP TFffi CITY I ' OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ~'~ ~ ~ ESTAeLISNINC A POLICY RBQUTAINO TH8 I I I PREPARATION OP AN OPERATZONIIL COST ANALYSIS ~ PRIOR TO TI0 APPROVAL OP ANY NEN PUBLIC i !AGILITY I ; i I~ 6. Approval to authorire Cho advertising of the "Notice 29 i ~ i Inviting esda" for CM Tra[fic Slgnel and Street t ~ ImproYeaienta on Aocheabr Avenue and loothill Boulevard, I ~~ to be funded from 9yatema Development Pund. Account No. '~ I 22-4637-8942. oven. c."...."..... .... ..- on . I ! I I, I ~ .________.. ..-. ... ... ~ A RESOLUTION OF T!~ CITY COUNCIL OF TF~ CITY I l l OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING i i i PLAN9 AND SPECIFICATIONS FOA TN8 "TRAFFIC I ~ I I SIGNAL AND STREET TMPROVE!¢NTS ON ROCFO;STER "~ I I AVENUE AND POOTRTI.L BOOLHVARO", IN SAID CITY i I ~ ~ ~ AND AUTMORIEINO AND DIRECTING TN8 CITY CLERK TO AOVBRTISH TO RECEIVE BIDS ~ ~ ~ I 7. Approval of a ProNeslonal Services Agreement for I 34 ~ ~ I library related neade. I II e. Approval for additional Cundinq to W added to Contract 35A I No. 90-095, Cucamonga Elementary School Field ImyIVVBOaInt Prc ie~f; SV^S iee Ldnd:c:po Cinuyany, I I Incorporated, for Change Orden exceeding the original i I I 301 contingency, Account No. 20-4&32-9013. City Cauncll Agande November 7, 1990 PAGE 19. Approval to award and execute Letter Amendment No. 1 to 3 5 'I the Professional Services Agreement (m 90-108) for the I preparation of the Etiwnnds North specific Plan with ~ ~ C.H. Snginaering in tAa amount of $5,593.10 which will ba funded from contract services account No. 01-4333- it ' ~ 6028 (PY H9/90). ~ I , I II _... Approval to awarC and eze _~e Letter Amcrdmsnt Ro. 2 iJ 77 '~ ~ ! I the Professional Sarvlces Agreement (CO 90-lOH) for the i preperntion of the Btiwande North Specific Plan with ! C.M. Engineering in the amount of 312,900 which will 6e • ~, funded from contract service account No. 01-4333-6028 i I , '~ (FY 89/901. I • ' I 11. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 90- • 3g 028) with J. F. Oevidean Aeeociatea, Inc., to provide additional engineering services to prepare preliminary ! construction cost estimates for the Trails ~ Implementation Plan. The Change order is fOr the total I ~ amount of $4,490 to bring the contract total to $17,670 to bs paid from contract services, account No. 01-4333- ~ ' 6028-3653. 12. Approval to destroy rocords and documents which are no 39 I I I longer required ns provided under Government Code 1 1 ~I i i Section 34090. L , I I I A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COG NCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIPORYIA, AUTNORIEING i I I I THB DESTRUCTION OP CI T1' RECORDS AND I II ~ ~ ~I DOCUMENTS NNICN AR6 NO LON17ER MQVI1tED AS II I ~,; PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT COi)E SBCTION 34090 i 13. Approval of Mep, exseution of Improvement Agreement, 50 I Improvement Security end O[derlnq the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance DLtrict 3 end Street Lighting Maintananes District Nos. 1 and 6 !or Parcel Mep 13125, i ~ locetsd an the wuthwsst corner of Trademark Street and I ( Center Avenue, submitted by Burke Comelercial Developa)ent. ~ 51 RESOLUTION NO. 90-414 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNC::L OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIIWRN::A, APPROVING PARRL NAP NUMBER 13125 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 11940) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND INPAOVEtlSNT SECURITY .p City Connell Agenda 7 . .P b: November 7, 1990 I <oP ar~3 PAGE 4 ~ 52 - i ~ RESOLUTION NO. 90-415 I j A RBSOLUTION OY TNS CITY COUNCIL OP TED; CITY I OP AANCAO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ' THE ANNEBAT ION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO I ' ''. ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AHO ~ ~', 'I STABET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. • I 1 AND 6 POR PAACBL MAP 13145 ~ , '~ ld. Approval of Mep, execution of Improvement A9raemeni, 55 I I Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to i Landscape Msintenenee Dietrlct Mo. 3 end Street Lighting ' ~ ~ ' Maintenance Dietrlct Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Hap 11940 ' I ~~ 'I located on the southeast corner of White Oak Avsnue and l ~, Elm Avenue, eubolittad by Sahamn Development Company, I ' I, I Incorporated. V RESOLUTZON NO. 90-416 56 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COONCIL OP TFDi CITY I i OF RANCHO CUCAMONOAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ~ I , ' N M11 N0 ~I ~ MAP O. 94 NPROVEIBNT AGREEMLNT AND IMPROVElBNT SECURITY i , 57 j RESOLL*f LON NO. 90-417 A PRC(1T.nTTf1N /1P Tn/ nTTV M~TPn~T n _..- ____ ~~ I OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOPNSA ORDERING • i THB ANNEYATION OP CERTAIN TBAAITORY TO ~ I LANDSCAPB MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREET LIGNT ING MAINTSMANCB DISTRICT NOS. j I, 1 AND 6 POR PARCEL MAP 11940 I I 'I ' I 15. Approval of Map, execut Lon of Improvement Agreement, I 60 Improvement Security end ordering the Annexation tc Landecnpe Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting ', Maintenance District Noe• 1 and 4 for Parcel Hnp 11473, ' ~ located on tAe south ^ids of Hamilton Street, eset of Hermon Awnw submitted by Bruce Nei. ' I' ~' i I AESOLUTSON NO. 90-418 I 61 t ~ ~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP ]U1NCH0 CUCAMOMGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING • I PARCEL MAp NUMBER 11473, IMPROVBNBNT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY City Council Agenda NOV~Eer 7, 3990 PAGE RESOLUTION NO. 90-419 j 62 A RESOLUTION OP TAB CITY COUNCIL OP TRS CITY OP RANClIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THB ANNSEATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANOSCAPB MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR FARCSL NAP ii473 16. Approval of a Grant of Easement between Southern I 65 California Bdieon Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of providing electrical Service to residential property located north of Baee Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 90-420 ~ 66 A R830LUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL O! THB CITY OP RANCHO CVCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GRANT OP EA9ENENT BETHBBN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HDISOfl COHPANY AND TH8 CITY O! RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR THE PUAP038 OF PROVIDING ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO ABSIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD SETNBEN NILLIEEN AVBNUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE 17. Approval [o accept improvements, release of bonds and 6H "'" a nv~ive wr uomplmuon toi Parcel 1 of Parcel Nap 6937 loeeted et 13425 Victoria street. l Releaee: Faithful Performance Cert iflcatse $3,410 of Deposit 51,000 pESOLUTION NO. 90-421 69 A RESOLUTION OT THS CITY COUNCIL OP TNS CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POA PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL NAP 6937 AND AVTXORIEINO THE FILING 08 A NOTICE OF COMPLBTION POR THE WOAIC ~ 1°-• Approves t0 aoCepL impcmvement•, teiesee of bonds end 7u file a Notice of Cpspletlon !or Tract 14150 (lormerly Traci 13271) located on the northwest corner o[ Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avsnus. PAGE City Council Agendn November 7, 1990 6 39 2C 21 Release: Paithful Performance Bond (Strwt) Tract 14150 $78, SCO Milliken Ave./Nt. Vlew to Base Line $153,600 Milliken Ave./POOthill to Ht. View $653,000 Accept: NaintenanCe Ouatnntee Bond (Street) Tract 1d350 $7,850 Milliken Ave.jMt. VLaw io Baee Line $15,360 Mill ikon Ave./POOthill to Mt. View $65,300 ABSOLUTION NO. 90-422 A RESOLVTION OF TF1S CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OF AIINCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTING TH6 PUBLIC IMPROV6lBNTS FOA TRACT 14150 (PORNBRLY TRACT 13271) AND AUTNORILIN6 TBE PILING OP A NOTICE OY COMPLETION FOR TNB HORK Approval to release Paithful Performance Bond and Labor c Notarial Bond for tAe landscaping of Tract 13565-1 thru -4, located ai the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Hardman Bullock Aaad. Release, Labor & Material Bond $gBB,000 Approval to accept improvements, release of bonds end file n Notice of Completion for 13235 Victoria Street. RBSOLV^a ION NO. 90-423 A RESOLUTION O! THE CITY COUNCIL oP TIDE CITY OP RANCHO CUC]IMONOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TH6 PVBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 13235 VICTORIA STR88T AND AUTHORILINC TBS PILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION !OA TFIE HOAR Approval to accept Parka Maintenance and Retrofits eonetruction at varlnU. C!ty park+, ,^o.^.izact _, on_ 022 ~, as complete, relesu bonds end authorise the City Engineer to Ella a Notice of Completion. 71 72 73 74 75 PAGE Clty Council Agende November 7, 1990 7 I ~ ~ I I ~~i III ~ ~ ~. 22 l i I i I 23 24 25 RESOLUTION NO. 90-424 A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALI POANIA, ACCEPTING TH8 PARRS MAINTENANCE AND RSTROPITS AT VARI008 CITY PARRS, CONTIUCT NO. 90-022, AND AUTHORISING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION BOA TAE WORX Approval to execute Improvement Agreement 8xtaneion for DR BA-14 located on thq northwgat corner of Archibald Avenue and 8th Street qubmiited by Nollau Devq lopmenG Company, Ins. RESOLUTION NO. 90-425 A RESOLUTION OP TF~ CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY O! RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVAMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SHCURITY PoR DR 88-16 Approval to ascots Improvement Agreement Extgneion for Parcel Map 11838r located on the northwget cetngr of Haag Line Road snd Victoria Patk Laner submitted by The Wlliiem Lyon Compnny. AESOLDTION NO. 90-426 A RESOLUTION OP TNS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRBAMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROV6!ffiNT SECURITY FOA PARCEL MAP 11838 Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for DA 87-34, located on the Wget aids of Archibald Avenue south of seas Llns Aoad, eubmittgd by ARCM, Ltd. RESOLVTION NO. 90-427 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP AN7CH0 CuCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND ZMPROVSMfitT SECURITY BOR DP. w7-ag Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10246, locatW on the southwest corner of HS1L ids Road and Maven Avenue, submitted by JCA Dsvslopmgnt. 76 ~~ )a 80 82 83 85 86 city Council Agenda November 7, 1990 PAGE ABSOLOTION NO. 90-428 88 i li i A A890LUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 1 . OP RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ~ i '' ~ IMPAOVElBNT AGREENHNT EXTENSION AND IHPAOVBNENT SECURITY IOR TRACT 10246 { i I ! I ~ I ! I ''~ s. coNamFr oanlNAMCad j '~~ I ~'~ TAO foalovinq orniaance. ha.r naa public nrnriagz at sh. tiu ' j j i of firs! wading. Breoad rudioga an azpretrd 4o br routinr '~, ~i i j avd aov-coatsotraial. Thry will W actrd upon by !hr Council I ~ ~ at oar tier without diacuuioa. Thr Cily CUrk will rrad the C tit U. Anp itra eau M rrro.rd far diaeuwion. I i i 1. SPRINELERS IN ALL RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS AND CERTAIN RELATED ACCE930RY BUILDINGS i ORDINANCE NO. 626 (wcond wading) I 89 i AN ORDINANCB OP THE CITY COUNCIL O! TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIPOW7IA, AMEND IMO TITLE 15, 9UILDIIP09 AND CONSTRUCTION, OP THE ~ RANCHO CUGIMONOA MUNICIPAL CODE ANO ADOPTING HY REFERENCE BTANDAA08 NPPA 13D ANO NPPA i I ~ 13R, HOTli PUBLISHED BY THS NATIONAL FIRE ~ ~ PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, REQUIRING THE i i i i INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC PIKE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES AND CERTAIN BUILDINGS ACCESSORY 1TiERETO, NITH ~ ~' '~ CERTAIN AHEND[Q;NTS, DELETIONS AND EXCBPTION I , . '' TO SAID CODES I ~~ i ~' ~~ it ORDINANCE NO. 636 (second rending) 97 I ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA , CALIPORN IA, AMENDING i I ! TITLE 15, HVILDINOS AND CONSTRUCTION, OP THE ~ I I RANCHO CUCAMONOA MUNICIPAL 0008 AND ADOPTING ~ ' HY REFERENCE STANDARDS NPPA 13D AND NAPA I I ~ ~ 13F., HOTH PUELISFR- EX THE HATIOHAL PIKE i PROTECTION ASSOCIATIONr REQUIRING 1T76 i INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPAIMICLEA I I I 9Y9TBM8 IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES AND CERTAIN BUILDING8 ACCESSORY THERETO, NITH CERTAIN AlBNDMENTB, DELETIONS AND BXCEPTION TO SAID 000B9 PACE City Council Agenda November 7, 1990 9 3. CONSIDERATION OF EIiVIAON!ffiNTAL ASSESSMENT VICTORIA SX~ID4UNITY PLAN AIRRVNHNT 90-OZ CITY OP i ND CUCANONGA - A raqueet to amend the density provisions of tae Victoria Ca®unity Plan to require changes in land uea designations to M approved by City Council. ORDINANCE NO. 432 (second reading) AN ORDINANCB OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP T86 CITY OP MNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA CONNUNITY PLAN AlBNDNENT 90-02, AMENDING THS DENSITY PROVISIONS OP THE VICTORIA CONNUNITY PLAN TO REQUIRE CHANG69 IN LAND USB DESIGNAT;ONE TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, AND N1IAING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CONSIDERATION OP BNVIRONNENTa ASSESSMENT D TB VISTA COMMONITY PLAN ANENDIOiNT 90-01 - CITY OP Nf'XO CUCAMONGA - A YsquesL to amend the density proofs ions of the Terra Vista Community elan to require changes in land use deDlgnations to M approved by City Council. ORDINANCE NO. 433 (second reading) AN ORDINANCB OP TN6 CITT COUNCIL OP THE CITY O! IUINCHO CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA CnrMfNITTV Di.aN aYDNnY•M'n on-n~ AlBNDING THE DENSITY PROVISIONS OP THE TERRA VISTA CONNUNITY PLAN TO AEQOIAE CNANOES IN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS TO B6 APPAOVBD BY CITY COUNCIL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TNAREOP Tae tolloriag hews ha•e been ed•ertised sad/or posted as public bssriags a required by lar. Ths chair rill open the wetiag to reeei•e public teslisgey. 1~$ 108 PAGE City Council Agenda Novsndler 7, 1990 10 1. BNVIRONMSNT A38ESSMENT AND TBNTATIVE TRACT 14192 - HIY ill li DHVELOPMHNT - Appeal of the Planning cammieeion•e I I decision to rxryire the undezgrounding o£ utilities and ' the construction of streai and storm drainage i I I improvements beyond the pro]act boundaries for a i I residential subdivision of 65 single-family iota on 19.7 sores of land located south of 19th 8tzeet between Hellman Avenue and Aawihyst Street in Lhe Low i Aesidentiel District - APN 202-061-L2, 16, 40 and 44. I j ~ (COaLinuW ltce October 3, 1990) 12. CONSIDERATION OP AN APPEAL OP CONDITIONAL USH PRAMIT 7E- j 179 j 03 AMENDMENT SAH•8 PLACE - A request An appeal of the ii i Planning Commission's decision to extend the hours of i ' i . operation for an existing bar and restaurant located at i the northr»st corner of Carnelian and 19th Strset in the 'i ~ ~~ Neighborhood Commercial Oletrict - APN: 201-811-56, SB, ~ ~ 59, 60. 3. BNVIRONMHNTAL ASSESSlBNT AND GBNBML PLAN AMHNDMHNT 40- ZOZ OlA - SRHANOOD - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Nap Tram Flood Control/Utility Corridor to Low Residential (2 - 4 dwelling unit par acre) for 1.92 acres contained within two parcels of land located north and south of en extension a£ Highlaxnd Avenue, nd; scent i i i ! i i to the eut and west ^ides of the Cucamonga Creek I ~ Channel. The City Connell will also cona:der Open Space I ...w ....., r..., u.N dwnf f wl I lass than 2 dwlling units per ii ~ ~ ~ acre) as possible land ues albzMtives. The Planning Comgieeion recommends approval of Vety Low Residential and leeuance of a Negative Declaration. APN: 201-200- 37 and 1062-640-57 and 53. ~ j i i i l I ~ I i i ~ R8SOLUTION NO. 90-429 ~ 222 I i j A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY I OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIlOANIA, APPROVING GENEIU\L PLAN AMHNDMENT 90-OlA TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USB HAP PROM FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY COARIOOR TO VHRY LON II RESIDENTIAL (L888 TBAH 2 DNELLINO UNITS PHA I I ACRE) FOR TWO PARCELS CON8ISTING OF 1.92 ~ ' i ii ACRES OF LARD LOCATED NORTH AHD SOtlTfi OP AH ~ I EXTENSION O[ HIGHLAND AVENUE ADJACENT TO THB i EAST SIDE OP THE CUCAHONDA CR861( CHANNEL), AND MAEIN6 PINDIN68 IN SUPPORT THEREOF PAGE City Council Agenda November 7, 1990 11 i I PNVZRONMBNTaT ASsESSMBNT AND DBl L-OPlD1NT DISTRICT I I Z02 I ~ I ANBNDMENT 90-01 - sHEAWOOD - A request to amend the ' i i ~ Development Districts Map from "PC" Plood Control to I II i ^L^ Low Residential (2 - 4 dwelling unit per acre) for '. 1.92 acres contained within two pnresls of land located ~ ~ I 'i ~ '~. north and south of an extension of tlighlnnd Avenue, j I I edyncant to the seat sod vast siMm of thm Cucamonga I ! I ' i Crack Chsnne:. The city Council will aLo consider "03• I I I Open Space and "VL" Very Low Residential (less than 2 I I i I ~I I dwelling unite per acre) as poesiDle land use I I alternatives. The Planning Co~soiaaion reconmende II 'I ~ approval of Very Low Residential and leeuance of a II II I ''. Negative Declarer ion. APN: 201-2U0-37 and 1062-640-57 I i ' and 58. t ORDINANCB NO. 435 (first reading) i ZZQ AN OADZNANCB O! TH6 CITY CWIHCIL OP T~ CITY i ~ i OP RANCHO COCAMONOA , CALIPOANIA, APPROVING DBVELOPMBNT DISTRICT AIRNDNENT 9D-O1, AI~NDIN6 THE DEVELOPlRNT DISTRICTS MAP PROH i "FC" (PZpDD CONTROL) TO "VL" (VERY LON R83ZDENTIAL) POR TNO PARCELS COI/9ISTINO OF 1.92 ACRES O! LAND LOGTED NORTH AND 80VTH OP AN EKTENSION O! NIGNI.7IND AVENUE MJACBNT i i 1'O THE BAST SIDE OP THE CUCA!(ONGA CABER i i I CHANNEL: AND MARINO lINDINOS IN SUPPORT ~ , I LaaaaVf . i I I II j 4. BNVIRONlDENTAL ASSBSSNENT AND DEVELOP NT DZ TRICT 2Z7 AHBNDl~NT 89-06 - TH6 JAN83 ORWP - A request to emend II ~ I the Development District Map from no :Doing designation ' I I ! Lo Low Resident ial (2 - 4 dws111ng uniC^ per acre) for I ~ I 17.94 acres of land loeatsd et tae southeast corner of MilEiksn Avenue and Vintage Drive - APN: 225-251-67. i Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. i i I ORDINANCE NO. 436 (fist[ reeding) I 285 AN OADINANC6 OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OP AANCNO CUCAMONCA , CALIPOANIA, APPROVING I ~ I ~'. i DEVBIAPMENT DISTRICT NO. 89-06, A RBQO[sT I I I ~ :v A:~N^., r.:a- Dav"BLOPMseT Dzam[ICfs MAP PTtoM j NO BONING DBSIONATION TO LW RESIDENTIAL (2 - 6 ONELLING UNITS P[R ACRE) POA 7.94 ACABS i OF LAND LOCATED AT THE 80UTNEAST ODANEA OP MIIJ.IKEN AVENUE AND VINTAOE DRIVE, AND i MAKING PINDINOS IN SUPPORT THEAEO- PACE City Council A9anda November 7, 1990 12 5. HNVIR0.~°NTIL: ASSHSSMHNT AND GHNBPAL PLAH AMHND!ffiNT 90- 02A - CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A taqueat to emend the Public Facilitiaa Element of the Censral Plan, In conformance with California•^ Nealth and SePety Code Section 25135.7(e ), to Lncorporate Dy reference the San Bernardino County Hezerdoua Waste Nanagamant Plm, as approved Dy the California Department of Nealth Services 3una 15, :99C. AESOLOTION NO. 90-430 A ABSOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP TN6 CSTY OF RARCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IPORNIAr APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-02A AMENDING THE GSNBRAL PLAN TO INCORPORATE HY AHPBRENCH THE APPROVBD SAN BHAl7ARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS WHETS MANAGEMENT PLAN (CNNNP) INTO THE PDHLIC PACILITSES SECTION OP THB LAND V88 AND DBVBLOPNHNT ELHMHNT POA RANCHO CVCANONGA, CALSTORNIA, AND NASINO FINDINGS IN SOPPORT THEREOF 6, 9NVT9l1wwRNTa1. •AARARMNNT awn SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 - CONSORTIL9! OP 6TIIDlNDA NOATN L~NDOWN3R3 - A taquaeL to approve Planning Co®laalon's recommendation to deny a spec if lc Plan for 5,080 dwelling unite, 9.6 aczaa of commercial, sn0 related school, park, and open apace ueu on e, lea acrrr ox •enu yvlrreiiy iwuaxrd , .. 24th 9trNt with portions north of Highland 'AVanua, eouih of the National Poreet Boundary with port Iona within the National Poreet, east of the sxteneion of Milliken Avenue, and weal of the eontenn City limit. Planning Commission recommande denial without prejudice. RHSOLUTION NO. 90-431 ~ A A630LUTION Ok'TN6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY j OP IUNCNO CUCAMONGAr CALIPOANIA, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICEr SPHCIPIC PLAN 39-01, GHNEIUfLLY LOCATED NOATN OP 2{TN STA86T METH PORTIONB NORTH OP MIGiQ.AND AVENUE, eOUTH OF I ~~ THB NATIONAL POABST BOUNDARY WITH PORTIONS Wiao:A :.i6 NAT:ON:.L a ASST, EAST OP T::B BSTENSION OP MILLSEEN AVSNU6, AND NEST OP TNS FONTANA CITY LIMIT 287 307 309 368 PAGE City Council Agenda NovtmD\r 7, 1990 13 The to130M1n9 itMt have oo legal publieatioD Or potting r\gaira\nt\. TAa Chair rLll optn t6a artliny to rawitt public LutiaonF. 1. CONSIDEIUTION TO AEOOCE THE 8PHHD LIjJjT ON ROCRHSTBR OROIRANCE NO. 437 (tirut reeding) AN ORDINANCB OF TF78 CITY COUNCIL OF TRB CITY OP IUNCNO CUCAMONOA , CALIFORNIA, 96CTION 10.20.020 08 TNB RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODH, AEOARDING PRIMA FACIE SPHSD LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STAEETB 2. PVHLIC NEARING OP PROTESTS REGARDING ENINNNT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACOUTAE PUBLIC RIONT-0F-NAY POR THR SIGNAL AND INTERSECTION IMPROVHMENT ~ORAOCBZSTHR AVNNUEAT P40THILL NOVLRVARD AT TIDL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11929 FOOTHILL BOULHVMD fAPNr 224-021-171 POR Tlie INSTALLATION OP TIU-RIC SIGNALS AND IIR+ROVRNENTS TO TA6 IN2ERGNCTION AT SAID PROPERTY AESOLVTION NO. 90-432 A RESOLUTION O! TIR CITY COUNCIL Ol TF1E CITY OP PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING TEOC PUBLIC NBED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEIR7 A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOGTED IN TIIH CITY O! RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND NAMING FINDENG9 IN SVPPORT THEREOF 3. PUB LIC HEARING OP PROTESTS REGAAIIING EMINANT DOMAIN INT ERSECTION SMPAOVENENT9 POR ROCNE3TER AVENUE AT F ILL BOVLE'JAAD AT THE PROPERTIES tACATEb AT 3171 99 HDC TH NE3SEA AVENUE AND 11911 FOOTHILL BODLEVAAD IAPN 229 -02 -31. 32 RESPECTIVHI.YI FOR TRt INSTALLATION O! N &AI D PROPHATY 370 373 376 377 382 PACE Clty Council Agenda November 7, 1990 14 ABSOLUTION NO. 90-433 383 A RESOLUTION OP TNH CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY 08 RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OBCLARING TH8 POBLIC NS80 AND pEC633ITY TO C-0NDHMN A PORTION OP CERTAIN ARAL PROPERTY LOGTED IN TRH CITY OP MNCHO CUCAMONOA AND MAKING FINDINGS IH SUPPORT TNEREOP 388 4. PUBL ACTI IC REARING O! P ON TO AC4UIRH PUB ROTESTS AH LIC RIGHT-0 GAADING EMINENT D P-NAY POR THE SIGN OMAIN AL AND R V EMERTB FOR ROCRESTHR AyHN UB AT INTE POOT O ASHCTION 2MP FIIL BOOLHVAAD AT TAE PRO PERTY LOCATED AT 11871 vrvvr unr BOOLEPARD lAPN: 229-011-1Ot POR THS INST A~ TION OF TR ? }IC 9IGYALS A.~ IMPROVEMENTS TO THS INTE RSECTION AT BAID PROPERTY RESOLUTION NO. 90-634 389 A ABSOLUTION OF TFDI CIT.' COUNCIL OP TNH CITY OF AANCIIO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING TAE PUBLIC NEED ANO NHCESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OP CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ZN TH8 CITY OP pANCRO CUCAMONGA AND N7IRING FINDINGS IK SUPPORT T'.7ERHOF w. CTT} MANAGER'S ETAT- REPORTS Tha following itga do not 14gallp raquira anp public UakiNnn}, •ltboug6 tIIa Chair up open tha ranting foe public input. 1. CONSIDBIUTION OY A ABSOLUTION 9UPPOATIN6 THB CRBATION i 394 AND VSS OP AN "INLAND EMPIRE" POSTMARK RESOLUTION NO. 90-435 ~ 395 A RESOLUTION OP TME CITY COUNCIL OP TH6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, TO INSTITUTE THE INLAND 6NPIR6 POSTNMII ~~ PAGE City Councll Agenda November 7, 1990 ~ 15 ~ ~ ~ ~ z. 390 ~ i - A request tc adopt a Resolution of Zntent for various ii lil ~ it changes in the land use, Circulation, and public facilities elements of the wrnral Plan to provide ~' ~ ' consistency Detwen the 8tiwanda North Spec ifie Plan and ' ~ I the General Plan, as well as changes in ocher elements , '~ ~'~ ~~ I ae may W needed to provide internal Coneietency within I I ~!I ~ I the cenerai Flan, Eor the arse generally located within I ~ ',, ii the Stiwand6 Nozth Specific Plan, portions north of ' Highland Avenue, south of the National Porest Boundary (with portions within the National Forest), east of the ' ~ ' extension of Milliken Avenue, and wet of the Pmntana ', city llmie. I j ' ~ RESOLUTION tl0. 90-636 ~ 401 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Ili OP MNCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, OP INTBNT ' TO PREPARE AMENOMENTB TO THE GBNBAAL PLAN i I I INCLVD ING VARIOUS CHANGES IN THE LARD VSB, ~ ~ ~ i i CIRCULATION, AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENTS TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY BETN88N TII6 ETINANDA NORTH SPECZlIC PLAN AND TAE GENERAL YLAN, A8 WELL AS CHANGES IN OTNER BLAMENTS AS M11Y I I, BE NEEDED TO PAOVID6 INTERNAL CONSISTENCY ' NITHIN THE GENERAL PLAN ~ i i ._ ~. O Yv[ I i I ' ' I. COVNCIL NONINEe ~I li i i The Eollowia Ltus have beo r •sted D the Cit Council I 9 equ Y Y ~ ',, l Eor discuuioa. They an not public bearing ites, ^1LhougD the Chair eY opes the eating for public input. !j, ~ i i Na Ltaos submitted. '' ~ J IDEN22FICATIOM OP ITEYe FOA NETT N66TZM0 i i I Tbi• is Lhe tie for CLLF Council Co ideti[F Lbe ites tbq wLb to discuss aC the nest estlog. Thus itse will mt be discussed at tb/s nesting, en1F identilisd for tbs ns:t eating. li~~ PAGE City Council Agandn November 7, 1990 16 1[. COMNOIfICATI0d1E PR011 T86 pONLIC I Tbis in the tine and place foe tba general public to addrala ~ ro t Ii cl t ~ l 1 w i ~ Aganda. ~ rot prnio in odW on t6 i addressing ao7 1ne I I ~; The City Council say receive tastiaoay and ut the aetUr fos i , I t a subsagoan! eaoting. Co~auta era to ba 1Litad to Siva ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~i ninutaa par individual. ~ ; I~ I i j l L. AOJOIIRA®IT I 'i I, Oebra J. Adams, City Cletk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, I i , i hereby car[ify that a true, accureie copy oP the foregoing agenda van posted on November 2, 1990, seventy-two (72) hours prior to iha meeting par Government Cods 56953 at 10500 civic ~ I i III ~ ~ it ~ I i I i, '~ i I i I I ' Center OriVe. I ~ i I I i, I i ~ I I l October 3, 1990 CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA RHDHVSLOPI~NT AGHNCY MINUTHS Aecular Meetinc A regular meeting of the Aancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency wee held on Wednesday, October 3, 1990, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Present were Agencymember e: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Charlae J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wz Lght, and Chairman Dennis L. Scout. Also preeeni were: Jack Lam, Hxecutive Director; Andrew Arexyneki, Aeeietant Legal Couneel; Linda D. Oaniele, Deputy Director; Jetty e. Pulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Goaw:a, Community Development Directory Brad Buller, City Planner; R1nn Warren, AeeoCiate PlartnerJ Scott Murphy, Associate Planner; Tom Drahn, Aeeietant Planner; Shintu Bose, Deputy City 6ngineerJ Paul Rougeau, Tratfic Hnginear; Robert 2etterberq, Public Norke Maintenance XanagerJ Joe Schultz, n~....,~ ae..., ...e n,..._...~.... _ _ _ _ _ Administrative Services Director) 6u can Neely, Finance Off Seer; Janos Proet, City Treasurer; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst Ii; chief nennie Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Pire Protection Diet rict7 Lt. Bob Pappler, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and nebra J. Adams, Aeeietant Secretary. f } ~ R • Ir No communication wee made from the public. • f R • • f C1. Approval of s Memorandum of Underetnnding (CO RA90-009) with Nughea Investments, Incorporated and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ITIDI PVLLBD FOR DIHCVBBION 6Y CODNCILMEMBBR sVQUeT. C2. Approval and authorization to execute wntrncta with RMA croup (R!chard Ntlla) for Inapectlon Services for Pira station < (m RA90-O30) and Flre etstion 5 (CO M90-011). Redevsiopment Agency Nlnutee October 3, 1990 Page Z NOTIONS Moved Dy Buqust, seconded by Brown to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Itwa No. C1. Hot ion carried unanimously, 5-O. •~e~.• DIHCDHBION O! ITL11 C1. Approval of a Wasoravdum of tladaralaadfag (CO RA90-DD9) with HugDea Iaveatasnte, Sacerporaled sad tDs Citp of Haaeho Cvcaawnga. Councllmember Buquet wanted to make aura that the NDU that was handed eut was just another copy of what wee previously distributed, and asked if there were any changes. Andrew Arczynuki, Aeeletant Legal Couneal, stated there were some minor aaxsndmenta, but that staff recomooende adoption of the document. He stated the amendments wars made ea a result of convsreetlone with Hughes Invaetmente• repreeentativea to clarify some amDigultiee and connerne :hey had. Chairman Stout stated ha realized this was of great importance to the City to become a reality es soon se possible, but stated hs still had soaa lingering concerns about traffic circulation around the uport• park ee a result of tale chsnge. Hs felt that a wrioue error has bwn made in making thin cAangs without knowing precisely what is going io happen on the commercial piece. ila reiterated he felt the City ahouid ague ahead with tae eport• park. NOTIONS Moved by 9uquet, seconded by Brown to approve Item cl. Hot ion carded A-1 (Stout nod. • ~ w e MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, eHc Assistant Secretary Approved: September 26, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Joint Meeting of the City Council and the Environmental Management Conuoieeion A. CALL TO ORDER A joint meeting of the Aancho Cucamonga City Council and the Environmental Management Conmieeton meC on Nedneeday, September 26, 1990, in the Haven Conference Room at the Civic Center, located aC 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting wee called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Hayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilau:mberex William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wright, And Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Fresant ware Co:m:las loners: Nohan Baingopalnn, Stephen Barrae (arrived 7:10 p. m.), James Campbell; John Dunlap (arrived 7:10 p.m.), Patricia Geye, Cathy Waiters, Jack Will tame, and Chair Tiine Roee. Also present were: L: nda D. Dante le, __~__ ^_i Rc.---- ..a:.f B. Fulwood, Deputy City Hanage[; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyetv`I I; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Oietrict; and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. Absent ware Commies toners: Grace Jones, George Le imams, and Ray McIIvain R R R R R R N. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION B1. O COMMISSION B2. DISCUSSION OP ITEMS GF MUTUi+L CaNCSRH Chair Rose stated the Commission was concerned about what their limits are ne a comRieeion, since they have already been approached by groupp asking for support on issues that du not directly effect the City, and they were not sure whether their body should be discussing these types of ieauee or concantreting more on the community. City Council/Bnvironmental Management Commlaeion Minutes September 26, 1990 Pages 2 Hayor Stout stated the council has not had a chance to discuss this, but he was concerned that since the Commission ie new, they do not have a reputation at this time, and felt they needed to build that reputation of trust and respect in the community by handling small items in the beginning, and deal with them soundly, and then build from there. After that reputation ie established, than they could move on to larger scope segues that might affect other communit ie6. Y +~ n • ~ A Coamli seionars Barrae and -un lap arrived at 7:10 p.m. w ~ He also felt that the enabling ordinance gave the Commission jurisdiction ae its own body, but also set it up as an adyieory group to the City Council, the Planning Coromiselon, and the other Commissions 1n the City. Ha felt in the beginning they should Da concerned with issues that directly affect the City and help set vp ptograme, and then Lf they have a good reputation, then they can start offering their opinion Yo others on larger scope items. He also felt that everyone had their own individual opiniene which could be expressed at any time. Councilmember Alexander agreed with the Hayor that items addressed at the present time should be items Chet affect tae City. He did not want to limit the CommieeLou thcugh, and nteted the items could even be broad in scope, Dut they would in some way ei9nif scantly affect the City. rnnncltmamber Wright Ee1t eha Commlaaion should not Ds given strict guidelines, and that they should deal with bigger zaeues. ana uu.iel....od t....:. -- _ of people selected to fill a role, and felt Chet anything 4viswed sa ^en environmental issue should be dealt with 6y the Commission. She felt they shoo ld have full authority to take action, instead of the Council giving them a little authority ai a time, and the Council ehou Ld let the Commission dec tde what they can handle, since if they were to deal with everything thaC had to do with the environment it would be overwhelming. She did not want them to be limited to just AB939 and a strict work program, eha[ they ehou ld 6e able !o deal with anything environmental Ln the City, and that staff could advise them when they were crossing over Lnto the Planning Commies LOn'e scope. She felt they should deal wits !hinge that effect the City, and also be able to deal with anything brought to them by otaet Comnieaione in the Clty. Councilmembez Brown felt that AB939 will be a very complex Seeue, end tact once the ccnau?tact 13ent if lea the uomponenta and goals, the Commission will be heavily Involved in how to eccompiieh Ehvea gmis ..,~ the City; nut the coneu pant will not be done until tae middle of next year. 6he egteed that the Commission neade8 tc establish a reputation, but did not want to preclude them f com dealing with any issues that might go outside of the City Doundariee. she felt theca would be tLSe• when an Leeue would overlap Commieeione, sad felt Chey ehou ld all be able to work together. She felt a work program was good, but d!d not wont them to ba conf load by the structure of one. city council/Environmental Management Commission Ninutea September 36, 1990 Page 3 Chair Rose stated she did not feel Che Commission was looking for an assigned work program, but was looking for input on how the Council wanted the Commission to operate. They did not went to tackle an issue and invest a lot of Lima an it, and then find out that was not an Seeue the Council wanted them to handle. She felt the Commission understood that if an Seaue came before them that affected the Clty and its environs, they would inveeti9ate it end make a decision. The area that they were not sure about was if they were npproeched about a federal level issue that dealt with the environment, but did not directly impact the City, should they be spending their time on it, or just utilise their time for issues that more directly affected Rancho Cucamonga. Ccuncilmember Wright felt that Sf an issue like that came up, the Commission should decide whether or not they want tc undertake that ivaue. Councilmember Buquet perceived that the Commission ie trying to establish their identity, and felt there was a tremendous amount of work to be done in iown. Be felt the Commission sae capable of making decisions, and did not want them to became a 'rubber stamp" for special interest groups. He thovq:t they needed to have a plan of action and set their prior iiiee, and did not sea anything wrong with being incremental in their approach. Ne felt aB939 will Cake a lot of their time. He stated he would like them to ba proactive end look for things Lhat need to be dealt with in the City, and not qo oft on large issues at this time, ouch ae the rain forests, or preservation in Northern California, until they take sere of things in their own backyard. Mayor Stout felt whet hs had sold earl ler had bean misunderstood. He eteted the mint ha had tried to make was not that easwone should tell the Commission what the issues are. He elated the only power was the power given by the residents of the community, eo when they approach a teak they need to consider the people they are repreeentinq and whether a part iculnr issue Le important to them. He felt the Commission needs to be the base at what they do in a profeeelonal and effective way, ae are all the Commissions in the City, and that they eccomplieh what they undertake, whatever that may he. He wanted them Lo exercise good judgment in their role ae a Ccamieeioner. councilmemDSr Brown felt the Commission needed to be able to lmk at their agendas objectively, and decide if the items Drought by spacial interest groups shoo ld be reviewed, and how they would Eit Into the City's framework, and go from there. She oleo felt thak certain items could be handled ae zecammandations of the Environmental Management Compiealon, and did not always have to come higher as recommendations to the City Council. Councilmembez Alexander wondered if the rent of the community wanted the Conmiea ion to deal with issues that did not directly affect the City, because he pereonnally felt the commlsslon should be focusing on more direct mettera. City Council/environmental Management commission Minutes September 26, 1990 Page 4 Commissioner Williams wanted to see the Commission set guidel lose for dealing with issues that directly affect the City, and other indirect ieeuee such as air and water pollution, entl stay away from items each as the Desert protection Bill. He felt they should aetnblieh a work program and set genie, and try to accomplish those goals. Commissioner Gaye agreed the Commission needed to focus their attention in order to be effective, and did not want to see them become a tool fot spacial interest groups. She felt the Commission needed more control over their agendas. Mayot Stoa felt it might be beneficial Ear the Commission to review pentling environmental legislation, and provide recosniendet lone to the Council on it. Councilmember Buquet staled he would like to rely on the Commission tc provide education to Che Council on environmental ieeuee, and to have them look ahead end ident l.'y potential ieeuee. Commissioner Barrae felt the Commission was reaching n consensus to focus on more local ieeuee, and when they do deal with wider reaching topics, the would have enough credibility that it would mean something when the City endorsee ar opposes an Leeue. Commiealoner Wattere stated the enabling ordinnnce was fairly structured, and had noticed that It did grant Fact finding cepebilit lee to the Commission. when she hee asked residents whet ieeuee concern them, moat of them were concernetl about mandatory refuse collection. She also stated she hoe been spptoeched by seoole wonderinn vhv thw Cnmmisw{nn wa. nor invnww.+ {n •ne n...+n+.... ... •+... 8t lwande Specific Plan that was currently being revived by the Plannlny Commteeion and the City Council. Councilmember Buquet stated the City hoe expressed concerns about that area for e long Yime, and with several different developers, Dut they are in a Catch-22 eituat ion with the County, end they do not know if their input will always be considered. He felt it was mote of a Planning issue because of having io do an finvlronmental Impact Report for any development in the area. Councilmember Wright stored that since a lot of these ieeuee are old ones that era just coming around again Ln another configuration, they are continuing with the groups thnt nave been involved since the beginning. She stated that if acme of these items ware coming up for the fLreL Lime now, the Council might be involving the SnvironmenC al Management Commiaeion also. Commieaioner Balagopalan stated that when he first joined the Commission ha thought they would be dealing mainly wish recycling, but hoe been pleased about the variety of Lesuas they have covered. He felt, however, that they should try to focus an ieeuee that concern the community more directly, but to stay open to Lesuae brought to them that might not hove an immediate impact, but would somewhere down the line. city Council/Snvironmentel Management Commission Minutes September 26, 1990 Pnga S Commissioner Dunlap felt the Commission should be involved in legislation ae mentioned earlier, and also felt they might need additional staff resources. Mayor Stout stated the Commieaion did not always have to have staff present when ever they worketl on a project or held a subcommittee meeting. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, etnied that etnff has tried to put out an extra effort to sestet the Commission during the developmental stage, and they have been involved more with things like subcommittee meet inge, etc. Commieeloner Barrae felt the Commieelon was moving towards doing more far themselves ae a working Commission, and he often felt reluctant to ask staff for aeeleiance because he knew the Camnieeioners were to do a lot of the research t hemee lvee. Mayor Stout also recoeniended that Lf the Commission felt there wee pending legielat ion chat would effect the City, they should not rely on the summary Dui review a copy of the entire bill. He also would like to see the City Lnvolvsd in developing enviro~ental legislation that could be taken to Sacramento. Commissioner Dunlap also felt the City might want to look at adding an air quality element to the General Plan. Counciimember Huquec felt that ie what the Council meant 6y being on the leading edge on ieauee, and would like to sea the Commission be preac[ive and make raconmendations to Council on upcoming Lseues. Commissioner Campbell felt the Conmleeion could eet their own gs idq}!poa for a work program and did not need the Council to create one for them, and agreed that he would also like to see the Commission address Leeuee epecif is to the City firer. Larry Nendereon, Principal Planner, stated the Comnleaion might want to develop a detailed Mission Statement. Me stated the council had all Comnleeions create Mieeion Siatemen^,e about cne to two years ago, which the Council reviewed and commented on, and then were formally adopted by the respective Cammieeione. Re stated that when the Commiselone set their annual watk programs, they refer to their Mieslon Statements for guidance on setting priorities. Chair Rose elated chat would be very appropriate for the commieeion to do. Cvmrueeion Sai64uyei ea atatvd it would also hn i_o thn ovhiic to know what chs Commleeion Se trying to accomplish. Councilmembsr alexender felt the Camnleelon was off to a good etnrt, end asked if they thought they were comforteDle enough now that they did not need a member ct the Council Subcommittee present at each of their meetings. City Council/Environmental Management Commission Minutes SeptamDar 26, 1990 Page 6 Chair Aoea stated they did not need n Subcomsittoe member present at each meeting. and could adviu when their was an Seeue pending that they would like a Subcommittee member present to review. No communications were made. • • • 1 R Chair :lose adjourned the Hnviro:mantal Management Comaieaion meeting. Mayor Stout adjourned the City Council meeting. The meeting adjo~sned at 8:60 p.m. Respect Eully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk approved Dy Environmental M.enagement Comoieeion: 10-25-90 approved by City Council: October 3, 1990 CITY OF AANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTSH Reau lar Meetin0 A. CALL TD ORi16R A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, October 3, 1990, in the Connell Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order nt 7:09 p.m. by Mayor Donnie L. 6tout. Present ware Councilmembere: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Charlee J. Huquet II, Pamela J. Nright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Hanagert Andrew Arexyneki, Assistant City Attorney; Linde D. Denials, Deputy City Manager; Jerry H. Pvlwaod, Deputy Clty Manager; Aick Gomez, Community Development Dlreotori Hrnd Huller, City Planner; Alar. Warrenr Aaacc tare Planner; Scott Hurphy, Aeeociete Planner; Tom Orahn, Aeeietant Planner; Shiniu Bose, Deputy City 6ngineeri Paul Rougeau, Tratfis Rnginaer; Robert Setierberq, Public Worka Maintenance Manager; Toe Schultz, Community 9arv ices Dlrwctorr Rsrwn Pmow zw.a e~.n~ w.~e a~......... Administrative Services Director; Su can Neely, Finance Off iceri James Proai, City Treasurer; Diane O•Neal, Management Analyst II, Chief Dennis Michas 1, Rancho Cucamonga Pire Protection District; Lt. Hob Peppier, Renchn Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. « • . ~ . „ $ ANNOUNC~Frs/PR_A$WTATIONS No announcemante or preeentatione were made. ~ + . C. COMMONICATIONS FROM TRR rnmr.rr Ci. Duke Dann, 10576 Val inda court, comnenteC on developers building in the City and then leaving, end did not feel they had reepect Por the land. CZ. Ceorge Bennet, 5Z 67 Silver Mountain Way, stated the area on Hermosa between Vista Grove and Nilson has numerous potholes. Ne added oven though the Clty has repeised the potholes on numerous occasions, he would like for that arse to have a street the[ is in better condition than it ia. City Council NSnutaa October 3, 1990 Page 2 Nayor Stout asked foY Sack Law to inveetlgate this matter and report back to the City Council. x• x x x x D1. Approvnl of MLnutee: September 5, 1990 (Stout absent) D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Hoe. 9/19/90 and 9/26/50; and Payroll ending 9/13/90 for the toiel amount of $3,530,955.51. D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Otf Snle Beer & Wine (20) for 7-Eleven Atone 2136-2571d, The Southland Corporation, Delta Harlone and John HerYy, 8081 Archibald Avenue. 04. Approval to open escrow with Generel Dynamite Corporation for purchase of land an Milliken Avenue between 6th and 7th Sttsete, to obtain the right-of-way for the Hil liken Avenue Underpass, for $60,000.00, plus escrow fees of $2,000.00 to be paid from Account No. 35-50300 and authari ea the Deputy City Engineer to execute all necessary documents. D5. Approval of Summary Vacation of 1 portion of a street easement, Pepperidge Lane, east of Hellman Avenue. RE80LOTION NO. 90-380 A AP.AOT.fM'tON ne mw rTmv mown.. __ mwm ^___ -. .-...-.... CVCANONGA, CALIFOANIA, BUMMAAILY ORDE iING THE'VACATION OF A PORTION OF A STRSST EASSMBNT D6. Approval tc Releeae a Real Property improvement Contreci end Lien Agreement For DR 86-43, located on the norrneaet corner of Blghth Street and Saker Avenue submitted by Eighth Street Industrial Park, a California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 90-381 A RESOLUTION OF TNS CITY COUNCIL OP TFIB CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, RBLBASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGRB&~BNT PROM SICH:'N STRE%T INDUSTRIAL PARR, A CALIPOANIA LIHITED PARTNBRSH IP D7. Approval to award end nuthorizetlon Eor executl on of ecDiract (co 90-137) Eor Nineteenth street Zmprovoment Protect, located from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue, for iha amount of $319,892.00 ($290,511.25 plus 101 coot ingency), to be funded from 9yatame and 35140 Funds, Account No. 22-4637-8744. City CouncLl Ninuiee October 3, 1990 Page 3 De. Approval oP an Indenture and to execute an agreement (CO 90-138) Deiween Southern Pacifie Transportation Company and the City for construction of a grade crossing at Rochester Avenue northerly of ease Line Rond; and approval to execute a related agreement (CO 90-139( between The William Lyon Company and the City. ABSOLUTION NO. 90-382 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN INDENTURE AND AN AGRBHMENT BETWRSN THS SOD THEPN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY AND THE CITY AND A RELATED AGRRSMBNT BETWEEN THB HILL IAM LYON COMPANY AND TH8 CITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A GAAD6 CROSSING AT ROCNRSTER AVENUE NORTH OP BASE LZ NS ROAD D9. Approval of a Memorandum of Underetnnding (CO 90-140) with Nughee I nveetment e, Incorpozat ion antl the Redevelopment Agency. ITE11 RB110VED HT MAYOR STOUP. D10. Approval to execute Improvement Agreenxjnt, Improvement Security end ordering the Annexation to Lendaoape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for CVP 88-18, located on the east aide of Haven Avenue between Lemon and Highland Avenues, submitted by Divereif ied Properties Company IiI, Ltd. A830LUTION NO. 90-383 > Asanr.mr mw nv m.+o mmv _ CUCAMONOA, CALIFOAN IA, APPAOVING•IMPROVBMENT 'AGRBBMSNT •AND IMPROVSNBNT SECURITY FOR CONDITIONAL US8 PERMIT 85-18 RESOLUTION NO. 90-384 A RESOLUTIOR OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP i'HE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THS ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANOSCAP6 MAINTSNANCS DISTRICT NO. 3 ANO BTASET LIGHTING NAINTENANCS DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND i POR CUP 88-18 D11. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Traci 13425, located on the north Bide of 19th Street between Haven Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Glenfed Development. RESOLE rIOa Au. Yu-.~Mh A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP THII CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPRO'/SMBNT AGREBNBNT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT 86CURITY POR TRACT 13425 D12. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement exteneicn for Parcel Nap 11030, located on the northeut corner of Foothill Boulevard end Haven Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development. Clty Caunell Minuto October 3, 1990 Page b ABSOLUTION No. 90-356 A ABSOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CfICAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, APPROVING II@ROVBMSNT AGRSEIffiNT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEIriiNT SECURITY POR PARCEL MAP 11030 D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement extension for Parcel Mnp 11671, located en thw northwwet rorne[ of 9th 9L Set an3 9uffalo Avenue, scSmiLLGd Dy Mleeion Land Company. RBSOLVTION NO. 90-3B7 A ASSOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCANONGA, CALI PORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT BXTSNSION AND ZMPROVSMSNT SSCUAIITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11671 D 14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Blm Avenue Improvement e, located on Elm Avenue between Church Street and Spruce Avenue, submitted by Lewis Humes. RESOLUTION NO. 90-388 A PESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROV]NG IMPROVBIBNT AGRHBMBNT EXTENSZON AND IMPFOVBI@NT SECURITY BOR 8LM AVENUE 015. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 6809 Hellman .. __ _______ _ _.- _~~. ~..... ~. ..e...~Ki.. ... e....e auw w ii ci. wcreec, submitted by Laszlo Jae e. ABSOLUTION NO. 90-389 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPAOVBMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVBMENT SECURITY FOA fi509 HSLLMAN AVENUE D16. Approval LO nocept the Meet Beryl Park Improvements and Waet Beryl Sawa[ Zmproveim3nte Project and filing a "Notice of Ccmpletion" for the work. RHSOLUTION NO. 90-390 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OP RANCAU CgraynNra rar.rynpurA ACCE?TIN[ .... ........., IMPR TNS WEST BERYL PROJECT AND WEST BSRYL^SEWEA INPADVEMBNTB AND AUTNORIEINO THB PILING OP A NOTICE ON COMPLETION POR THE WORK D17. Approval to accept Improvement •, Aeleese of Bonds end Notice of Completion for Tracts 13117 and 13118, located on the Beet eider of Xavan Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Banyan 8trset. City Council Minutes October 3, 1990 Page 5 Tract 13117 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $619,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Hond (Street) $ 61,500.00 Tract 13 Release: 118 Faithful Yerfo[mance Bond (Street) $800,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 80,000.00 ABSOLUTION NO. 90-391 A ABSOLUTION OP TNB CITY CAUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OP AANCAO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TNB POBLIC IMPROVP.NENTS POR TRACTS 13117 AND 33118 AND AUTHORS LING THS FILING OF A NOTICE OP CONFLATION FOR THS WORA D18. Approval to accept Improveawnts, Aelesee of Bonds end Notice of completion for CUP 67-19, located on the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Lomita Court. Release: Faithful Performance Cash Bond (Street) $ 11,340.00 RBSOLVTION NO. 90-391 A R890LUTIOM OF THB CITY CWNCIL OF THB CITY OF AANCKO CUCAMONGA, CALL POANIA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR ..-: ... ..... ~ .......J:..: L.:.:.w eiL:m..,v n nuu..a ur wnr,,aa'iun POR THB WORK D39. Approval to release Sewer and Water sonde for Tract 33565-5 thru 13565-10 located on the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardman-Bullock Road. MOTIONi Moved by Wrlghi, eeconded by BYOwn to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item No. 09. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. 1R 11}R iTEN D9. Approval of o Mesorsadue of OndersLandiag (CO 90-140) ritA Bughes Isvutpnts, Iacorpontioe and Lbs RMOSlopssro! Agsney. MOTION: Moved by Brown, eeconded by Alexnnder to approve Item D9. Motion carried, 4-i (Stout no). Mayor Stout eteted he voted na Eor the same reason so ha voted no when this ltao was considered by the Redevelopment Agency. 1 1 • } City Council Nlnub• October 3, 1490 Page 6 fil. CONSIDHAATION OP ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS NT IND STRI 6PH IFI P AMENDMHNT 90-01 - BARMAICIAN -A request to change th• designation from SuDnrea 4 to Subarea 5 for five scree of land located on the south aide of 6th Street, approximately 470 feet east of Archibald Avenue. Oehra J. Adnme, City Clerk. Lead the Title of Ordinance Nn. 429, OADI NANCH NO. 629 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE Ol THB CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOi:OA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPHCIF IC PLAN AllBNDMENT 90-01 Ttl CNANGB THH DHSIGNATION FROM 9UBARHA 4 TO SUBARHh 9 FOR FIVE ACRHS OF LAND LOCATED ON TH6 SOOTN SIDB OF 6TH STRBET, APPAOYIMATHLY 470 P%HT BAST OF ARCHIHALD AVENUE - APN 210-071-50. RELATHO FILE: U36 DBTERMINATIOM 90-02 MOTION: Novd by A]•xandar, ••cond•d by Baguet to waive full read.inq and approve Ordinance No. 424. lotion carried unanimously, 5-0. • • • • • + E2. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN O IN NC6 E TAB ISRINO TA 4 FOR COM_1,HTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVHlLNTS AND RO L TION POR OM F CY Debra J. Adem•, City Clerk, rend the title of Ordintnc• No. 430. oADINANCS NO. 430 (second reeding) AN ORDINANCB OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NBN CHAPTER 16.37 TO THB RANCHO CUCAMONGA HVNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TN6 ESTABLISHMENT OP STANDARDS FOR COMPLETION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND A80ULATION3 FOA OCCOPANCX OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURBS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by august to waive full reeding end approve Ordinance No. 430. Motion earriod unanimously, 5-0. • R • • • R F. ABVEkTIexn m_nn.rC menu rYna ITEMS Fl AND FS MERE DISCUIIEED AT ON6 TIME, BVT THE MINUT68 HILL R61111IE IN AGENDA ORDER. City Council Minutes October 3, 1990 Page 7 F1. CONSIDERATION OF 8'+igIRON!@NTAL ASSH99MBNT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO 9p- 0a - CITY O~ RANGED COCAMONOA 9PORT5 COMPLER - A request to review the Environmental Aeaeeament end 8roject application Eoz the development of a sports complex consisting of a 4,000 seat bneeball stadium, three softball fields, one informal baseball field, tw soccer fields, perk area, animal shelter and parking erase on a1.6 acres of land in the General Industrial Category (Subarea 8) of the Industrial specific Plan, located nt the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, APN 22?-011-05, 05, 07, 16, 17, 18, 22 and 23, and recommendation of the Seausnce of a negative declaration. Related applications: Environmental Aeaeeament and Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 90-03, Circulation Issues and Tree P.emoval Permit 90-33. Staff report presented by Joe 5chult z, Community Services Director. Councilmember Wright inquired about the parking requirements Eor this project and asked for justification on the 1700 pecking spaces planned. Brad Buller, Clty Planner, stated this project meets the parking requirements and standards of the City of Rancho Cucamongn. Joe Schultz, Community Sarvicen Director, added the ratio la 3 to 1 which meats tae standards of the City. Re asked for the Engineer of the project Lo give additional informntion on tale matter. Michael Schaefer, project nrchitect, stated that the parking figures are par the City•a zoning ordinance and thnt the number of pecking spaces planned ezceeda what the City normally requires. Cnb nrllme~nMr P•.m.~~ .aa_., sp_ -.]]1G:.L '... ..ear . ~im~ ii every beat In the stadium wee filled, the nundlers worked out to ,be 3,to 1. Mayor Stout added that the Planning Commission waa comfortable with the parking requirements. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public h08ting. Addressing the Council wee: Pran Mnnzano, 6069 Palling Tree Lane, stated there are no Little League fields in this complex and was concerned about that since there appeared to be nothing planned for the children. There being no further response, the public hearing wee cloned. councilmember Wright stated she would like Prnn Menaano'e statement answered. Joe Schultz, Community Services Director, eiated the Bite has been designed so that the adults and young adults would use this fncility because of its location in the Snduelrlal area and the fact they they have the capability to drive tc this location. Ha added thin wou1Q tree up the other fields for the children. City Council Ninutee October 3, 1990 Page 8 hayor stout stated this site was chosen because of ire location, which would better accommodate the lighting aspect. He also reiterated the fact that wish this alts being used for adult e, ii would free up the other fields for the children. He commented that the American Legion and High School could also use this stadium. councilmember Buquei stated this site is to De used Dy the adults and that the location was selected eo that it would have lees impact on the residents in the area. He felt it was a good move for the City to go forward. Councilmember Brown wanted it clarified that Lhie site would only De used by adults and high school kids, and that grades Kindergarten through S would be using the other fields in the City. Couneilmember Alexander aeketl Sf n minor league teem comes in to Rancho Cucamonga, would there be a possibility of the seam putting on training camp sessions for children. Joe Schultz, Cortmunity Services Manager, stated yea RESGLDTIGN NO. 90-393 A ABSOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DBVELOP!ffiNT A%VIBN NO. 90-04 LOCATED ON THE WEST SID% GP AOCfIi:STEA AV%Ntlb, NORTH OF ARROW' ROUTE IN THS GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY (SUBAREA 8) OF TH% INDUSTRIAL SP%CI PIC PLAN MOTION: Roved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 90- 393. notion carried unanlnrously 5-0. R w ~ . . . ITEMS P2 AND P3 N%RE CONSIDERED AT 2%E SAME TIMH. F2. CONSIDEAAT ION TO DSSIGNATB MAI STREET AS A PRIVATE STREET AND E%EMPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES FAON REOUTAEMENTS SET PORTH IN CHAPTER 12 OB OP THE MllNICIPAL CODE (ITEM TO 06 CONTINUED) Mayor Stout asked Whet date the continuance le being asked for. Jack Lam, Ctty Manager, stated October 17. Mayor stout logo fired es to why staff wanted the continuance. Jack Lam, Clty Manager, stated for further study. MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to continue Item P2 to the October 17, 1990 meoiing. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. . • ~ City Council Minutes October 3, 1990 Page 9 F3. CONSIDERATION TO DESIGNATE LA SBNDA ROAD AND CIL OL AVE 'H AS PRIVATE STREETS AND ERHNPTING THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES PR4 REDDIR- NT xORTN IN CRAFTER 12.08 OP THE MUNICIPAL CODE (ITEM TO BE CONTINUED) MOTION: Moved by Nright, seconded by Buquet to continue Item F3 to the October 37, 1990 meeting. Motion carried unnniawuely, 5-0. * s ~ x x : F4. C,~J7SIOB~TION OP AN APPEAL OF HNVIRONMENTIL. ASSESSMENT ANO T NTATIVS CT 14866 - THE PSNNHILL COMPANY - An appeal by an adjoining property owner of a Planning Comsieeion decision approving a reeldential subdivision ane design review of 47 single family lots on 8.7 acres of land i.n the Low Nadium Roaident ial District (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) located at the southeast cornet of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue - APN 201-252-21 and 22. Neyor Stout stated the appellant has asked For a continuance to the October 17, 1990 meeting. Councilmembar Brown stated there were already n lot of items continued to October 17. Councilmember Alexander stated he would like for the City Council to grant the extension. councilmember Buquet felt the item should be continued to NovamDsr 1. Councilmember Wright felt Lt ehou ld be heard •* th:a ~e.,..- Mayor Stout felt the council should proceed wish the item tonight. Bill Piehei 1, Pennhill Company, stated he had originally asked for this to be heard in September and stated now Lt ie being suggested to continue tae matter again. He addod he felt it was only delaying tact ice and wne coating him money. NOTION: Novel by Alexander, seconded by Brown to continue the Siam to Octubsr 17, 3990 meeting. The motion failed by the fallowing vote: Ayse: Alexander, Bcown Noeex Baguet, Stout, Nright .,- Clty Council proceeded with the liem with a staff report given Dy Tom Orehn, Assistant Planner. Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner, stated Lhere woe also a rsprasentativs present frao cucamonge County Natar District. Mayor stout opened the ogseing for publLc hearing. Addressing tM Council wu: City Council Minutes October 3, 1990 Page 30 8111 Fiehell, Pennhill Company, stated the newer easement has been approved by CCWD and felt Biscayne only wanted to delay this project Thera being ne further response, the public hearing was closed Councilmember Alexander asked iE the appeal ie den±=_d, could negotiat lone go on wi[h possible changes made to the project if agreed upon. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yea. Councilmember Buquet stated after having heard both aides of the story, that is why he changed hie mind about not granting the extension because of the number cf times contact has been made with the parties involved. RESOLUTION NO. 90-394 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14&66, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 67 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 8.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT TH8 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LBMON AVENUE AND LONDON AVENUB IN TH8 LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DNELLING UNITS PBR ACRE), AND MAXI NG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THBRBOP RESOLUTION NU. 90-395 A RBSOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO TRACT .NO^ 14866, A AESI DENTIAL SUBDIVISION OP 47 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 8.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT TH8 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LEMON AVENUE AND LONDON AVENUE IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-b DWELLZNG UNITS I+SR ACRE), AND MAXING FIND INCS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Wright, eecontled by Brown to approve Resolution Nos. 90-394 and 90-395, which denies the appeal. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. M • f t k F5. CONSIDERATi OF NV R N S T DUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN 9 - Y N - A proposed amendment to adjust the northern boundary of Subarea 8 on the we et aide of Rochester Avenue northeriv 330 Eeet. we eteriv i Ae5 fwwt. and wear hwriv 330 fwwt to ice nrwwwnr. boundary wtth Subarea 7I delete the planned extension of Day Creek Boulevard between Roc heater and Milliken Avenues) and realign a portion oY Day Creek Bou leverd east of Rochast ar Avenue. The purpose of thte amendment Le to accomnadate the development of a City sports park at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Arrow Highway - APH 229-011-05, 06, 24, 229-021-15, Z0, 28, 34, 61, 42, 44, 45, 53, 54, and 55. The Planning Commission recommends issuance of n Negative Declaration. Staff report presented by Alan Warren, Aesociats Planner. City Council Hinutes OctoDSt 3, 1990 Page I1 (See Item P1 Lmi Discussion) Debra J. Adams, city Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 431. ORDINANCB NO. 431 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCYO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMEMDMSNT NO. 90-03 TO nOSOST TAB NORTABRN BOUNDARY OP SUBAREA S ON THB NEST SIDS OP ROCHESTER AVENUE NOATAERLY 330 FEET, WESTERLY 1,065 PEST, ARD SOUTHERLY 330 FSBT TO ITS PRESENT BOUNDARY NITX SUBAABA 7, DELETION OF THB PLANNED B%TENSION OF DAY CRSSE BOULEVARD 861'WeBN ROCHESTER AND NILLIAEN AVENVES) AND THE REALIGRHENT OF A PORTION OP DAY CREEK BOOLEVARD BAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND HARING PINDINGS IN SUPPORT THBREOP MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to waive full reeding and eat second reading of Ordinance No. 431 for the October 17, 1990 meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. . e • • x FS. CONSIDERATION OF &NVIAONMBNTAL ASSESSMENT ANO TENTATIVE TMCT 14192 - HI% DEPELDPHENT - Appeal of the Planning Conmiseion's decision io require the undergroutuiinq of utilities and the coneirvction oL street and storm drainage improvements beyond the project Dounderies Lora neidantiel subdivLion of 65 tingle-family lots on 19.7 acres of land loomed south of 19th Strwt between vettm a..o .a en n.n~e..o~ a..ve. ,.. .... _,.,.,-.,_ 061-12, 34, 40 and 66. (Its conlinusd fr+o~ Septssdter S, 1990) (ITEM TO OE CONTINUED TO OCTOBEE 17, 1990) Mayor Stout suggested this item come back at the November 7, 1990 meeting. RESOLVTION NO. 90-353 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OF IUINCH0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORY IA, DENYING A REQUEST TO OELBT6 POUR COND TT IONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TMCT 14192 FOR A RBS IDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 65 SINGLE PAHILY LOTS ON 19.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OP 19TH STREBT BETWEEN HBLLNAN AVENUE AND AMETHYST STPSBT IN TH6 LON RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND HARING PI ND INGS IN SUPPORT THERBO- NOTION: Moved Dy Brown, seconded by Alexander to continue the item to November 7. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. • • + • . No items Submitted. City Councll Ninutes October 3, 1990 Page 12 R R• f R R NI. CONSIDERATION OP A RESOLUTION FOR CITY RB IMRURSBMBNT PRON A PLANNED y~NANCING POR THS PAOPOSSD S00 MME COMMVNIGTZON PROJSCT staff report presented by Jack Lam, C,'.ty Manager. ABSOLUTION NO. 90-396 A A850LUTION OP THS CITY COONCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING TNAT PAYMENTS MADE HY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH TIC PAOP09ED 800 HHE COMlfUNI GTIONS PROJECT ARR TO HL HADE IN ANTICIPATION OF REIMBUA98MENT PROM THE PROC3LDS OF A PL7INNBD FINANCING TO BR ACCOMPLISNBD BY THE CITY ANIr AUTHORILZNG AND OIHECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RBS PEvT :'.NEAETO MOTION: Moved by Bwluet, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 90-396. p +t ion carried unaniaouely, 5-0. • • R R R H2. CONSIDERATION 01' BSSOCIAT209 PVHLZGTZON AEOUT NISSING AND ABUSED CNILDRLN. ACCOUNT NO. 01-4122- 6028 Statf [sport prevented Dy Jack Lam, Clty Mennger. MOTION: Noved bV BuaU St. seconded by ct..~.• ... r_.o ..__ _-:............... ... giro amount of $175.00. MOCion carried unanlmoualy, •5-O. R R R k R R z. couaczL EusINEEs I1. CONSIDERATION OP N MAJOR STRSETB (COallausd from July 10, 1990) staff report presented by Paul Rouyeau, Trnfflc Englne~~z. Mr. Sturman stated he would keep the Ciiy Councll pooled on how thin program is doing. NOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Brown to approve staff's recommandntion. Notion nArried unanirx:ualy, 5-^v. R R R t R R I2. CONSIDERATION 08 ASCOMMENDATIONS OP SUBCOMMITTEE FOR HEFTING ROOM NAMAS IN THB CIVIC CENTER Mayor Stout asked Lt the ^rggeated nems for No. 1 could be changed. City Council Minutes octobsr 3, 1990 Page 13 Councilmembar Wright explained why the name was chosen for that roan which had to do with the Lncorporation of the city and the history behind it. Councilmamber Baguet suggested that it be called the Tri-Communities Roam with the words A.C.B. below this. Councilmembez Wright eteted she would agree to that with the names of the tri- wamunitise listed below. Councilmember Hrown eteted they went to hnve an explanation with the hletory why this ie being named what it ie to be called. Councilmember Buquet caked that a map be developed to direct people to the various conference rooms. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Huquet to approve the names proposed and to include the change made to No. 1. Motion carried unanimously, 5-O. • R • R No items were identified for the next meeting. • • • • • • 81. Diane WL lliams, 7451 Amethyst, stated her concern was the need For a profeeelanal baseball team to be at the sports complex. Sha stated she did not feel this was necessary and did not feel it should be paid for with public funds. She nlso added she did not like the ides of beer belnq sold at this facility, end did not feel it would ba a wholesome, family environment. She asked Eor the Clty Council to reconsider their decision on this subject. Mayor Stout and Ccuncilmember Buquet asked Diana Willlame why she did not address the Council when this Ltem coma up on the agenda durlnq the regular course of the meeting. R2. Rey Sturman, wanted tc thank the City Council for whet they did with the signs in the cal-da-sec e. Mayor Stout thanked him Eor hie patience. • • • R A R City Council Minutes October 3, 1990 Paqe 14 HOTION: Noved by Buquet, seconded by Nright to adjourn. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned nt 8:24 p.m. Raepacifully cubmittad, Debra J. Aflame, CMC City Clerk Approved: E - - _; ;, E , an • 1 r o 1 N !NlnaewFeePOOaoeNOealPmwN•orpNn000iaNeee O 00 O N a MOONnONaONNOONON :00 :.aFN•F VNVOT.•n OOMnN000 p•l• PO • N NFNFaO•POVVNaFOr000Naw..NNIFOON••ONwPhNaF ~• Fw V a V omlN~ONN~B!^w alanat0•NtlaafOhV•hF4 w N n w•V Y P N Nn n•I MNT NPw.. PF awMw : ON O •. w w N a.nT w O• O• N •. w w .. ~1 O/ N 2• N N q O 1 O• <• q •> n N n •O• •Z: JF uiiw pO.. NNN NTNm SVrF nOT ~~~ •naFVIOwNT•NaFOIO •INT•MVFOpONNn•N VI•lI OeO ..NT M•ViM ial rf..F•MH•F.N~wwFIti MH M•.•tlli.•..rwMw•l.i yw w.l. •piMI~NN N.Oa •it V lOI VOOO !lV lpppPpPlP!!!!lPplpppppllpppplpplP!lIpPPP O. 1•1 .1a1 •!• ••1•V•••IVI•••1•••••V•111•V•V••IV••••••• 1•• •>• • • V V• I 1• 1 I.1 _ •• • • • tl• O.O t V F O I 0 nZ! ONO Mf N ~ W! t A O •! ! r NW• OMV hVxl r2! Ni< ) i > NW H JVZ I! N W O YO N N • •N • ~ • • •Y• JF V W • N 2 if L M l • a • O J O! YOi ~ N N YLIF 2 N yV Y Y O O N \ O V i V • a V VNV a yOV =v VN n it __• VN h IhfE 1 •!T• 'J /•Y nl w ~ IYNiN JWJ V qT.. VF > 6 Wn y lYiYn V y!i iNP fY y:d • • . nI V O ~ VNV j y V L 7 11= TiJ• V M'•.. i 1VJYf f V i Y• •SVN •N JW h WJ>1~ J JFV W w Y i O W• 1 Y : . t Z.m . : ~ ` Y h f p \ J J\ .e YDe7 Y.hF ii :NpwGNN:~ O.pOY uYl ~ •. P il w f•y owuu iw ~ o wWw\ a awn VO Olw iY • • • • i L s M W Z ~ O M Y a.•F W..lil 1 fi\ M W Y pYFi• i\ Wy Of y`WWO Oy0 f yW~/Y Oy OV iOiWp hi >N i JFiW >FWM i i L = V x 0 •iV• • • ~~ ry ~ f e \ \J\W J F\ NhY\1 f_<NJ •= L OYM Oya lYn )• _~ _ V MZ V i L u V N •h { Z n N J a O •iOV V~• ZWWOJNF ~J L a 6hiyarM ~.O•aP YhJ IN Yh if f t ~W h t ••`.It ~ `Y O N • f n ) Y Ji YFii aOL .OYaYL•••`f Ly a=aF •M~tOiMO~ ~MYJ >W M~tfiY Y te OJ ~ ~ `~ O ~ ~ ) > h ihl : a N> HYNAl~W ]~ MN~~Y~NN Y~M•i i LMVt ! if V W h a : L O fI Y Ya)i t f • V N Y•\OFL OfN YN)FFOfLMWhLhhh i O LL •O• W Ny V ~ YN WWnh SY iF\JFWVLJYYVNyyN yJyWyyJyyyy JPV.~YJNYO Wi0 h•Of YNV J•Yf1Y0i!•iif i V N N YI J _ _ _ f•i MYy N•.f VIN u YYNVYifIY ZVNfiit•[Y J.. •w• • • U Yh W N Y W 7 F O YW6YNiZ)~~N ..Vf)YOV]116My NOWOONO)VOYVfV••.y FMwNUVJ J y p N • Y • '1 y O Y = 7 N L o > N • • O V J Y N • Y • • Y ~j u f N N Y k < • • ~/• ^• N O : W Y i J Y 4 Z i W W fZ i • W 7 Z Z I y Fl Y G ~ 1Y / ) i J1 O H w • is _ .= I L = 0l .ny1 WNWV ~ W i i • • »W L N V V„LMVWW y MY O WWH • : J f ~ fYV MN'J y O iFN W O YN • N y Z _>N •Mfl 'WW! h OF OM Y iYWZ IW> Y W • J y 'JI 9 y ~ y WWO)JON KMN Wz ~W~•SJhwY !~ M ~ N > I • • _ hS O J • SNMVJW Y1[ yy `M '1H OWaf YF1~W y~JWY yWW a l>Y • O Vi ~ J ~i• M • W NO Y O Y V Wy1L t YF >YN i yaWL• 2 yVyyZ :f •JVOOOOSWW Whi iYVYJ ZW • • r Z W OVaJJVFLf ~ NfWJWWWF>(1 W p0<•JJYZMr Y • • Z O• Yi . 6 O N ~NOVNh~f •i hiihhhM<\ WYWiJ2i i ` ! V i~Nf~ ~ W h •fWY •F W • ~' Y• Z W • O N ry y •i hY J •NSifYJWYY•N ~ZiJ MMi MyF VM•NNNY J • /W~ • >J •L Y J J ~ {yW OM f YNNYiJpV yy yy~~yyyy yy J a> iy i O ~iffyV\WWY ~W~pOCO•~iff WJWYJFY~ YO ~ /i ti/ • i >L •~ • OOO < • > t NJVYFhYaF>WyLOV•\VYZNNMFV iiYNJiYJ>f• J! fff <ii~•f~~f1~~~t<V•Y\~~lOO~rO• r~~~~ 7 0 •V• •O• a pn NN l ! V a F x1~V«nlnmp•OPTVwIr.N NON<FNO•VFpnFNFTNyVVtI! yNnFn+m••Fpww.. •.••NTOYfYOMTIp..pTOTNOV t0• :W: • wM N N .1 N NT wP:M1 V.••!N•ONTT •V t1 •. N •.T NINITOMOp .. Vw••NN NNI N N MNNw N NMNNM / •>• • • / ,. :ii eeroeeeeoeaooemeoeaevonaeaw.eoeolonoAaheewePrePa eoaeoeePeeeeeeelewomoN.amoNSwwrhAeoN.ePPOPhpoePen.oon o < •••......••..••••••••...•••...•••••..•.. O enno u I N N b N T F H w ~ O I T N VP e \i • •I • U 1 ~-~N l• IM1N mI Mn O N Q/ w6M iY Ytin?e'?'1 'T~G'-~• i . IGI • nN w r n O T w0 IwY •Aw N p wOT'O l ••N wN N I ry ~ i i .• rv n N a o / i .. •i• i <o: ~i tl •O • JINVM•PO••NA•NaNeP Or•NTINOPOwOVNTVPOFOwOwNTaNahApOrNA1 _ ; • WNNryRryNNNryryHNNNNNNNNNRryryRNRNNNNNnRNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN i i iiiiiiii+iiiiiiiiiiiiiiaiiiiii+aiiiii ~ai ii P i i e i ii ii i ia •s• •i• ~ _ •• •. . . • ! O • W O • • VFi T NN 2 >T N N N Yf Yi W i0uee0 j W F • V LW Mp WN W OSY> • j N V V i WJM (ON OaM2 V 2hYWV OT • PYP r PF •W • Or VPO»N •AM W VYi<NW>W. O OW SPN NWM < O O W v OW N W 01<\• TAJO if JYJihMO N N m fNP • i Ai <N fi' O Wrf jiiLWe YY JN LnIL N A ~ b V • _ _ _ JJ A . MJ V VrWV< S OY SO ( NLOV _ MO <WtivVCVW ei S S < •• w~J 10f\ <. ON \ M Q F NYS L(L N7 « t M L )L W J pF • J J V`1 O ~ F „ Y YM_•w<>W O VV Y NY• fNi w G:O •• J N • ! y1 v V<iWil •i if <VVV I • • W• ='J • M : ••Yi •TWJY •O O pONVWMW L yFOPN O OLLhON W vOJ i•.V \2••Y A l\F •'ShWhf .9V\7J <YMnla M A~~ P O 0 v \ f _ i • ~ • i . w u i yOf F NLYiNWN<yWV<e~i Je> F\w r \L O r 600 v _ _ _N_ j p~h ONi iWLOJ L>OLi OL0011 t•~VW<i~OLMLPJ wWS010J •Y f W O<L O WO IT v w rv r Np{ W •6• : 6 y> > ~S>i(NLN I O i0O NNM( UNy NN WfN Nv F NrL)L~Nl~h 20n20iihOF\M IL\wNiNY iOjjILWM WYZL O L _ ON NO j•[<NONS••f W••NYWV•MNV SNNML iP•Of0 vWYM v j N O OJ rJiM O hj OWry NNV•OW AJ•aJLW N rJWV \Oe (FVVLh Y LhLll fL2tYF LNI•\VFV L VL JUFVVY O „ LL •O• MV JYrW rWV WJWJI>OYS O tlN0 •AJtjJ%N< N/<LJr fJ0 «fNjOVY<OrrJfh<Y= « OOCSJiPO>OWJfivf2920<wN00•tl Y LYSiLIN jN{~Y ivNVS~J2 %Yiil1 OOAjOieLLOLirO<260ii LN •W• Or heN90NhJOMN L VOOFVJOee(j OW70W Ls O! rWr SLWVi'.ZViwW22leJlvjnLNLM(rvvFWYeLWY2 MhW WNLiYiLeLLO ~h• -J O 60MyM4 N Sf r J M UwUOVRO VfYY MV 06~~ Otw~NwW »aGWUV V N > w • • l u i O N ) ( r • O • h 1 i W i O W u u ! • Z J N V N < V a y • II • / O W W Y O N i i <y tl <~ W M v W S S hh v • y V i ! / i Jv 7 •• V O Ow O N iY N V ii 9 i p ( ~ 4 W~ Oi Lii ~ S ~ 0O = O f „ ! # • '_ 'JW S v N r / / V• u:M W • r WWI 00 i Z MVW ihi~h i Ya • tl0 yO V OV•••lY YO M V YY~~h J Lf Otl uON M NJ • • / _ SONN1R F•••[•.Jh<J 1 r eii3 •• 1L i U vjZ • ! • v L>< N iNNMSW •• y0 i O W Niv VwOi QiWWy~1 ~:WhZlj Ow YwrOOtl W R: Z Fuu YNW 52v ~ZSGOW9Ntil~ vWOW YM JiL VYL YfJV Sf S~ vfV•f6N ~ fV<Y iw YOV y F O W )i hN vvYSW6 / • V• •irO e<l0< J< j Oi« <f 0i V < O• VF•N i UL(%WWVih• O~f V OS •i00 SNR •1faOW9FIVYY i>• ViN~NiOJ L WMMWY<JF !S •Vi • FOWfiiO OOOiWY<N \ irf2vV000W NMO wMW<l<O •vNOi I S Iiv< iW ~j9\jyie`iW%Y• ~•FO NLOjj2 NN•yy haJWNWUtJtl~N y •' •`L%DiMr •J N LRhhf~h WN~N WOOiS bl J /j • ' JN V « vO _ JI LLM YNJrJJMUY< t ` • <WSMJOe000000i0i~j OYIiO f•<.OJJNOfWM « •i• O.OOOUVVYYYYYYyJYYYYyVVVYVVVVO0000000000WWWWWWWLLWL • / /O/ a II•a~TNeVLN2aTOP•PAWNPNNN600AwP161A1•Y••N aONFO1NN•NNwmNOTO •0• •j• .•••Y •••1 v •N.O wOevO>OM WNNwN•• a6NNNwNNNO••O ••O • •M•IV RIa•N•••T PIN •wwAi w ••• wN N••r•NNNIv ~> ~ . m E eoheogeWPNewoeoeeNenweboNO.NeNappPbNP•«aaoW ° =e ~na e p o: . .r p e e egWpnNpnePebeNe«omowngPene P..ewn..PPNNrp«nren n ec ~ ~ o <e =w r :o~o r M ~ YI l w iln <. .w n~ el i.v cee o .w i.ne •~r..<se~~eeminor rNNiP a..le..m~OpmN^a W..IPOgI1N PmNFnN+p>sumnr. .M.s •• y PuO~q .. A •. w .• w O / O• S• ~• tl. : JNah2POgNmlMahfPeNMman01•f PO..NmrNahfPO.nNmaPa>OP O.INmrN zi WN n aaaaaa•a~hl-n.n«n nff2n f2f YfPPwPPwP/.N C peCC NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN«NNNNNNNNNNNPANNYNMNNNNNNNNN Nl1n O1 X1 .1 ~i p• IPPPPPPPPwPpwPPpwPPPPPPwwP•PPPPPIPwpPPPPpIPwpPPPP i: rraaaraavvaaaaaraaaarraa araraaaaaaararaaaaaaaararr :fi: u • • e iN LL NmIP- °re if W u fF w ~ VW ZPa •h Z N i N i O• Yn 9 N J Y a N • W L N:p P•. PS O I S W N J hf Z tl> / s •U O V.a m:~Nf I' i M i O i i L NIP1 2 i 2 e a fL n u e w u p s>m2 .. N a W s122z a . Z • L u hll..Hq I..h J •OSOnNiJ > (u N 1 JO f`L> p O NP • L YWIV .LVLFJ V WM\WJ f i y ON i w J W Y \ L•.ia YNi9 N`Jr=('J J SV W( '.! OVI • O •i• ` h1 : • b [WW m> WL L L f Y> V~ Y O f VY YuiliiWYi » LimJLM > L> NL O r>Ji O y JCJf Vil 60 • 1 W 1.Wtl al:i0 tlOYiI.• N O O \N \ (WFIy •tW22W~uni .a Y Otl W ILJWL YeLfi WOWfONOY J iIw 7 N h W OVf YNOA O NOHWOL: N.IP O a00NNMO..YtO 1 VOH Y~NVl20 afi \W>MtVYMJ Jh N >O2JINW02~•N=JJ7h JW y .. ~ _ NOM`NiVNr it Nib SWYR yj•aW.VW=PUZO. >W! =V0 S O •s• __ LNf PLWJL•.ONOO~W~ WpiOL R 7f'JYiL\SIG :„WaWLiYU11Y WWOL YILW hO51F NINh L NLYfI VtiV fa L J NNFW VJNOVYSL>LNO.•Oi hW I • • yy ` hJtVFMAfNWJaWNJL ~`i2VVi1 ~W!> \i(lWFLf>wNOf ~hWhihC OjC 6 p NfMNjJL~JffY NWM Y[N UMYwNi 01•NrYOltiiJarNVNViu20 N • LLJS iN Ji0 L f 0i i ON N (iV (•. i SW O N• .•• . VIfiV V VVyJIFJ V•O.~OVVJpJOJriViJYYYJJN~i~)~JW.VW4irJrf LL •O• ~ j .efONrO>iPfff O f r { MWf WffJf•VYYO Yf.J fJfWatti V •w _ _ _ tlVLtl20•.NOif 1022 If2hZYV2S SFYY •eVNtlV6MLLLV ~ YN fO ~ V~ N M i Ohtl~ • iWiW q hL Y..Y [ Ltl22 IL f iQiFNW •WhWi ZfZ3~• > ~mW OWL'OWO\ bW~2a00NWOf N«`` •NOOWNi11[[ 9»pWJOWp•}N> N W V6iVY>FV2NiONiWMPVyNYNV H.•iyiYyNNNNa~ y00N>VV>ViOMON • •~ Y • . _ V M ~ • 6 i . .• • J Z • ? VV N • O i J> 2 J N Y W V ~ WL _ s 2N N Y r ~W ~ ~ Z _ YO i i r W > Ji W M ( i . N >V ry O f i W i VWJ W • OW ~ V w J ..L O [ ~ • OV L + Uiy JfN 6V HF [O Z •Wi fw f0 26i L . f N =J VO W ~ _ _ _ 2 `O`. 2aMJw LW 2N.i 1yyiW WWi••JVO•.L •a•~~ N >N ep11YY pOp~~ W~A>tOL V~Y>~i 1f AApJ Wf JOVW.~6WO: fWJJ ~O~~Ni{ WOLO • • M FO a2h •[ VwW2N 2psJ3YF2V• ZWifL JLJO ffLV L•fi / • Nl LY:2. •J>pFL •V»> 1yN. LZNe>tf W>a11i JO 1 [V ~ O W ~ N • 1 h tf j~NL>) 51 •y=•JZ VMpY • •Nf • L • •p •r W • •f •1 • JLM •pt •~~ . O / YOY22NVf WyFYt J>•ihtl iVJ iNJ NI aNFi00 ..N iDiWa >i2 / • • sNt2W• a'Wy~• VIWW• ONy1 02 NfiiyWWWNO t •p.[J YOhJOJUi ii JNO iYiIO>ftlZiFF22 ••Dlffa 2 O NM • /i. 11 M i JJJ pOiiiWJtltlYJWpYiOW«VLJY2tfVJM>VOVY.OVJJ(>2i~2i'J O•N JJOOOYa.ffNJJO0Yti0 a ra. . • W N OO O O F V[Si2iii.WOOWJ2OOff /i• _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ L6LLLYLVVVVVVVVVVVV T Z N«FMMF.«MM1111Y 1{YYYJJ % I I I ryrnrONNlagaa>NOwumON2PNnOa•.JNNNMgOON«NPN mfaNel2nNe> ' YO• NN•IN OOIOOPOOO rI`mMnP0000NMmV•.«PPOpa~N q.•N n1a NOYPNN>nlm •O• /i• NMON~~Oa02P00.02NNNy001mf02r.anrNM1O I.IOeay.MyN~Nn120 N N Nr.nNwNnlla N NNNN NN N NNNNNNe NN •>• • u `Nw ~~a y:u Oa•• Zi f RD Fw Or• yJLL B iii ~: \• i• ~• V' •O~ •<r r .~• rUr r0 •i• •Y• r ~ 0 II r r i i r r r r r ~ IjW~ •:• isi i iei 11011 rW~ 11>• aeeiwew°e an01°Dp°pDa ~l°ni.•.e°ei.°•°o:I~weo~+eeoen°Ow ~l°n w.°uwwn°e ~n°e eweee wn •«««we~«iea~eoirilne~er;«««iw«ri««eowln«nriw ••nwow i•=o.•.~o«« mJaNO+^jNinNe~awN^PTNww+wT wTNraiah: NaaN•N MwwiJ NNNNTN JOCM COPOwNNINaN>P ryOry ryw NnaN•yIM1f PONNNaNahVwO••NTaNaM•POJNNa N'O TT„m wwiH wTiw•1 II ~11•IT i•11Ni1 ~y AI nry~•~1• TTNNnN P/I yy ..aa+ ++ ``PNNNNNN W I•I n~ II.11n•1T NNNTN Nl1T ^~Ii 111~M~~~~ITNTTnTn PPPPPIPPPPPPPPPPwPPPPPwPPPPPwPPPPPwPPPwPPPP}PPwPPPP oaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa < • w a T Ni a r• VV •h J WNJN Y f Y• e ry NNOT ~ a • MwOa 1 VT Y M n er ~ VIY• ~O N l •TU N N t• V NM V• N h I•Y r' T • ••• =~ •:• iV00 i M1O < •< h•.h •hM W > Vwi iw V Y ii Vil J FiJh i< \ W WYVP V_w_W_ i•VY l>N Yam YW apOV i hla h 11..S! Ftfya< iyiy ONVPi s O.~ ~p0\ fhf •a• ~V~1 i:MtW ii\Y Y ~i«~FHM yM N:he aua W <fas D of ev a .• NN> 9ww Y Y a 1 VI N VNi pJ Vi>Oa YWONYW VaN IVf V< JVhi 1W YO Jfl OOgW « <OYVY plO yY OOWTD•nJV\yWCY p F N p y 3o1<1•i JWa• \ NyNF `i` 1J~NMyy yFy J•ywy pJ•`\Ji ii 3 iWNrJW V jiDaii Ni 9N~f •.e1~YNpp~N9V•r•a~Inl ti>• YN ''JMNVNeVf 9 NLLaYJ>=W =WhyNY10 M<N<WO MNNaiNiaNNNL NNNe~<I~O~~f VNiM>a 111.w t V i'JWY• WiFyl iNiVNMN<Nii>Ni NNWM1N„iNNN••N OiiNYWaOW M`iLU JJNNNW MrMV a aMN>fMiVNYN: 1 YiLMNNW9NN:WV tt ~JOiJ JJ WJ>i i~ N• W> ~i20'J JaVihw<IJVJ=WVNiVjjOYj'VD=yahY N1N pY~JViYOW> «f•WWM\<Va <O<WJDL Oa iD<\06Y<V<WJVOi>ia VaTYOf Z i hhNOrNVNNOiiZ„US iiZ'JiLOiOhYVYNViT<OWSY•V SJN NiN U,iiJMlWiaDNM1YFUyLVaMWFFO>MYYlriiiiDiJwNYYM php hyyif>LLVV •NiywOtiSSN<VVOhwYw<>VNVtwMiV••NVViYWyY >IILiWi\•N•LOVFM•~h M i • 2 { 9 N i e i f o j ~ i D o J y 1 i ~ul= a JJ y r 14sW yy(( a e 6~ ~ i S v^¢ Z J N.ON S_J GV NO W ti O~• wN t SW~ eN Y iJl NJiJiVV NNWNh N• aNJN Ff i J aJ JifONNi iMtOYW <Vi y hi O <NW NJ hJiN6JFN WJ M< iiNii VNNWYVN eJNOf O O o •NiN JwjW < jry~ a It yyNNpp Mi`JF wW • .'.~. ii~J~ ihN•W~iaY~OpfJ VJJO f_VO 1aJOwt~O .JJwW ~F~[IN;VaFW=<NFWVOi> 10NNwiFNWNhMYYwV 'W YYN4i Lrlf OhiW~~iJ~iJNVhOJaJiV{M~.j~W~NMVO~~UV ~iJ N > FYY ~ .V OiJOU. <JJJJ>NO...Oi .\J>\ii _•ZMi il{NJY y0y0 i Y200~'31WiNOW J.aiV ~~YirViUWW~NFVhJi<pp WD~NM .HIV. ~rly w ViWWVY>• <frwwMMJJ000>~1< « V«{hNYVyVWWNNee~'J 'JVa~j VVSJiif VV<V< JJJJJJJJJJJJJiiiiiiii~iiittiiiiiiiitfi•Op00000aaaaa ewe•eaawrTNwaNrnNwNwN•ehNwwNNhnTaNON•hww•NhaNhNrN•w anwnwhn<wa•w•rwhNahNNrnTNNnNOwNeNaaNrNws•nNNN•NNwww On ONNNNOwNwnwwhhn ONNOnPOwNW^Nanw„nNnanrwnwNaNfwWw N TNN MNN T n NN NN MnN N N ry w w NNwr N iNP hl 9fw VQI S~~ i0„ WNW ONp hJLL V li ~i 'N„S°re°a°oqmotle°~>•reem~°Weu°.i.P+~eM+greonoe°.ie°e'.qi rN•l eq +ql oq'Nw oq o <°.N.owne «eriow•~«e~r=o.i e~ie~nln«.+i In ~«riaow.r. i~a«o~n non o+i~~ri ri.r. e reP yNylOThhNyONwOTNnnNbyyyNhllwhNOyyOy.rN NOnoNNtl V4 ~ N wN N Nw y nOtl • NwT yON rr 1 rrVyy T NN w POMNN1NNnOPOyNnINON OPOwNNintlhlPOyNNYNONOPOMNnYNV ~RRRS,A A~R.tlrl iRfi ~.n`nnNnhn^nni^r~~°.~1'~{n ~brl nb •T nn~nnnmm~nY,'R$SSSY$$S \•O rqi • i ~~ PPPPPPPIPPPPPPPPPPIPOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPOPPPPPPPPPP • OJi11V1•I•IfiliffffiilYf1YV11ff11•f1111iiiil•lff VfffV • •~• •h: W • •h~ •N • • • • • • 11 ii• • 1 11 •!• • ~ •O• •O• •ZY W• •>• • I \ \ N ZN M ~ N N V ly O J O w n h y ( 1 ~hV O 1 NWjN J 2Z n O p_ M_Y Z7 O M 2 V N T• O 9VOi \ Ji\ \>> •O J> 2 J _M NM O Z p NZ Vw uN .Yi JiIW J uii wPOiOrgi T O PV J oN O J_FW ~l NwNVw i w _iIYV MW ; N'J >V ~N \OOF\P Nr1M<Y MWt NON ON •IL hF 00 WiOW9)OYOh(Il O N _f YF IN WJI~W Y ZNi r• > ONV NZNrr rrZ O Ol Ol Ztl IM~rW >C tt> NONNOiiphMp •I OlOlO{WOh~P0000 _ Vpp >)00 O p\Y pOifO\WYVptWIOL{Z({Yf Vp01111 lrVi OV hl ! \ Zy I_1 pJJr lWi <>~iO ~ OWV O JM •tJLYVNJV ~ WZOIN>F ONZ l hY< Ham: ONJ WMWNOFpp 00 1.r OV1N0 •~YNZiNO• NYi 'J>PI•ZNOj W iZNWiZN ZZ)~IiNNNyONO OI •{W OIW : OOpiW Y.LOINZ lOFM02V90f YVNOJJN'J 'J Ofi01111 sFV• WIL)WINNIM >OINlpN2N4«(ZNDOp pLNLOFOTOON OWw NOV>!00" OS W MJS FyiW Vi <lN2pWZWWYWN OhNNT (N000 W JN• OYNVtWIpVZ i{W{{Wi~N VnNNN N:WOR6\JlZ W OMJ rY \JION• \ Y•t NV M 2 \ II 1 bNW UN rW VY OpIOWiNNNpNNnNZhNN7NNZN{Mt0000 NYW<OZ rS •ZMNU2JNfWy rh OV6N ypZMNW>NLNNINW Nnn J~UMWOYQyfwOJNe:~OwNONON6WhJwUOMwVJONJJgJJOJON1r~M~r U>NiM Kil tNlVi Mrr KNV OJVfN>uYVUNUNyItlhyN l<a1 :a:: u_ ~i~~ Y W W i l<l0 O O V l J N WWWW V J WV O l V N~iirNN O OiN u 1 2 •N•u r :!{ o zi:i p S3 Y ~°s _z :¢f ~ :: :::: ZS W_V_ t[l N} jVViWO ZaIW OV NOIO Wtl fh~l Wi i}}} IM hOT)Vh OOOVf{l YOO~ IFOiZ rirY>ION~WWOpWS JJiII>~JaOJNNNN NI NNV_j0_W0001 S1NY vN JJW NiiWW~~M OONW FShiS2~0000 CY h 'JiYO N IOOY. OY• Vi aNJNNJOgNi11~~Ul WWW• ~• ~WIW:Y 1f•{Nl •tVNNWWWW VN OJFI) lW>{109J N>{1{WWWWSNp• J7 O OY pppiN I\ liO Jlw>OZr>~• VUV~> YiuNMMO'JwLLJ>N•I •iWNFZI •{)i• iVrli tilp•IF YEN WWIWOi WOpOO yJN `iW N`N`6V>OOY>NJWNywy JlWIMWiVpZp.. JJJJ Wi{Yil~iN00 (IWL VY4I=~;OWh>sY100~lulJiSiSiWIMUJi ~jUYUY •WWSli NOOwOfOfOVIOI(I ZO fIOWWNNNN{00111111{t\YWiiNNNNZ0000 111p111!-lltlf0{{{{(OOYlO({{OtNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN IOr10 iMyi•O>OONMONOPONNIbynAiwrtl~~ON~~001VO1N{N{{hNNNNT NN~00 INO ONN<pOOMMNtl10NOOPNN O1rIwN0000 N.ONM~M~~y NOON 00 M O II 00 < ON NO ON<O Olrl S fu `Nw u~a VO €~" ZLO V N OJL N L V e: ` V• h'i«wry000i00<0000OniOwO00NOlPOTNVOOINNNTP w OOOVrOhOIOONiVOONOOnOTiOp«TTMNNiNVn P OOOOrNNONONOhNiNOONOON.e1y ONOTNOPwN!!N \•r NTTrT~^TNN+«NNwhNiNSNNPr«iMhNaTnrviTSTY«Na ei a N nw « ~ i •2. N ~• ~• •p. J)PO«NTaNi1. OlOwNT.NVhOPOMNT.NihVlOMNTrNih< )~:. WSS ::::::::::::::::::77::::::::::SSSSSSSSS •ii Pwwwwwwwwwwww!lwwwwwPww!lwwwwwwwwwwwww iii eiii..a.aaa.r.a .rrarrarrrrr.rarar•iairrr. iii 111 i l • s • • • sl : l= JZ .Wli u z i w JW si ~ zN lsi ^< h i r~ z J p uw f • ~ \ ~ 91 •„a i0 < T YN N F \ OrY« NJM V<O N O V \ VINO •Liw •a\TnrOwUa~N1 JJ y 2 • p ~ ~ ~N EtnP\E«A J•Oi\ FM1y«w„OLOL Uhi JO Y N h • • J`W OiJO NNO=\w1\i iLW000NJ«Wh« Li i L i fIOpOL~t O • \LVl\ NV«N iL < ' ~ > FNY iWW N WIYNiii PY.OS NUNS i «NY II NNNY •L« \iO1S1UFLi • JfE W •i• 000 •L a2i •i • O<V WL••OY~ = iN0 Y NVr .O• 1111 NLNNOaO whiiiYW •P IM1OOOi«• f0<«WS« NJi TPNN<Wf •Yf WJWL \~•> JhJJY00Jai~ LUJE Na L yOMOiLNNN JY VwOV009LNWW YYY V ~Ji 9• « TN VI~OWh1~~JWiO« f0<fiYW JMYNNJJLL NV Si •O«V6<NSYNaiFFiVVs)J ~OJ<OwJ« OWl •O• IIIIUOVYN J U„ fN V N W a St2 .NYJMNNN SOiYNN LON«NiONF iONN 1111 Y« eN<:a<L « ~ a««rhoiN«r«alLa«aaiL •M~ N OJVLJLJJUVWwJJJV)YN<J VJOOWOLNW MM PI•iJaLNOOYVfVOVViFOROVYOaJFLI•tiVNFVwOL« • • ' 3333 . 0 ..<. JJJJ SS V • NIS/IwM N M ) . F N • tz2z o: i s w~ r ~ • a . : '. `. ea 3..:. ~ :S ~~ :< aP`n ~ i wWYruJ 1 1 iuwi r V M W L~G•iit irtNL V Mw>M p~>tishN iii < o'a iiu y««fr) z r NNNN~n f02 ~ 1L1. NJ°O W_!W<Vn •I W6h~i!«M~tN VJ i JN ii0>O«S!'11t SY.0 SiE~ <WSO«JV • • WWOOfLZi VW iUW LJY •. w • . WW Si W>•i«J>h WVl W••i YUWV7i N_OJEya « • • w•Li nwWUO:WNO:<NUhYwVaViJtlNaVia O_y_N_ f•O YM~jL • : i •V •~ • e E hOOYNOi . JJJJNW•shFpNNNJO .ON)NOOy yhy l1i~//VW •yW{OVw2i >Wr •i~ VUVYV rVJEJiRiMOf~«NLJJJ2iYYw~ORMNNNFJJiiiWa N00000«~J JtWiiViVhl<fr<fNNMffrVWWWNO°°WfWW •i• NNNNNNNN«FFMFMFF}}) »))))ifiii)SiiiiR)NN :i: NNNTNhVwi«i«i<lOiNwTNO NwNOTIh.VNwaiwO l) O TTTTVwwwhTwl<wT•wTaNwhtl~VwNh«wThMh«wiONPm O• aaalhaOTNl00«ONOONNhONNV •OrNOOhN00 •i• N«NM NV Vi ON.~f TN VNTOE N i i NNOT •W• •>• < O ViNw Sir yYp O<•• Yix °w ri Ojs Y Y ..° ui ~i Z~ .I •) 9• I <i fi O L~ NCI 01 W~ MI i ) • ) • ) ~ ) i• :<) i• ~O% •O• Ii) IW• •}~ 1 I I I I 1 O O 00 W Op00000000N100000•0•N• O =w O. 0000 • N< Ow p000wO000NO00w0O000VOOTM O O O w Or0• r ~ r ~Ye• ww`•eri•n°e°e °o ~.•. °w ninwwnll°lin ae°ew i wn °w 1:mii w N f w f NTNwwNN wwwI1NY NwNfr O w •IIi • w w N O w O/1 • O hw 1 MO N ~ n n n ^ n n n ~ n n ~ ~ n n n ~ L• n nwn• •w wrww••wwww• • M1 ••wwww•n n w n JNC•yN ~IwN'I CNC yIy rq P••NN•N•rOwryO1y l1yy~M1yy ry1Sy ry•ry•I1~I~I•Iryry•NN•~••I 11O.~~~Y~11w N1wN11••1w~11w NV1 ~I 111.•1 y1~•O~~N•~N•OwNA• WTYO Zw.wjJNNNI~NNNNHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNZZZZp•pII1 Ili '•1~~ O••••••V•1•MIIf•IIISI•AZ•V•••'I•••111••••11J•ff•i1••• WO101 101 Il IW ~•II W 00 O I 1 1 101 Y Y ~ O i •hl1 ~ •O• •O• \ Y 1 N O • I.1 • ~ J t ~ ONy • N \N S YO 0 MYSM OJO Y • O O h hY0 »0 L N • •10N1 i i 0Ww p 2 • • •2• •L• • IL •~ N NYNSNY • • •Z• • r ~ < Y i0•1• N •IIINwfN< h N Y h • WNNNNi ` NwNM\'I D\L O Z N W ~L J\1110 • yNIN• i~2 O i MV Viy VOV M V J •INYM•• \w\N• • V VLV V V viYiVV OLOOwNNNNY N•MO Yi ~ V VIV V N NV • •vjwv WZwY \\\NV• \N=w• Oll V VYV V t VYVO O Yn by\pZ`~`~`w iLi Ny1OOoNhJitWYN N W_ O • L N <IL <W•OiV<ii{YNS `i l~iY~f Wh NN yi N O Q L N • 7) S~tfwVYYYM•Y p0_YYfMYZ NsM O NN >I ~ V S Y h ON M\pL`MqY3uY~~Y N09p'W NNJh iJ W hOTY N = Y•. NO O\(YYYNOJ NL`LLJrZSN N ~ M MYN V ~ T_ t L yZY •wLUhYJJJ~ •ZYifi!•NNLLO JJ Y YYN» S „ iy Y NY0000 111 r. ON p0 J V N f '1 U O ~Y y YOWi»>LO>f OYYVY>O<> { 00 N O hihJ O L Y JO i<WYWY000 LOVL O •OYY ~ ZS WOVL 6 O I N L IL>Y i<•f• f LWWVWtL><Ni W „V Y• Y< W u iYOtiW 20 9"Jp9 ON <L ( N f hY< ` M w NS JVbLiZZYNNhiYVYVi ZW > Y 2 OYhh J `<O OWLL iMMNiJ' hJ•f<fNNYNJr yh <r L J ~W1WiJ N N r; Y {Y O•WO~VYYY Jf Y~LJJJJYr<Vf0 O LL Z L fy YYO ( ~ :Y ; M O OW h M N • NN « ~ o e yv ~ e w < ~{i i y u u_ r ~ i w i wr .J. N a O V i NY ~ 2 M J O O N e • YNV O N ii O W yy< w w J MiNi W J <O OS h W V Y~ Z W W H V yNY V < SN • ( r 2 Y W N „i O <N VhMhr\MhON• S < V i O WsL J i( 1~hPrrN•t< rr i ii N h < JY J N W Z V~ iYOWW M_~~(JryJWI<p1OiNMMyM WY~W~ O n/w O h W yJ 11 ! M L ~ J FISIVS~ OWYiZYZwZZFZZV~f r JJ M V ~N s V f ~ M • .1 YS • •L < Nfffffl \NW > MN < J Y f _ _ ~ VV q LWfW<•L i(tiLiN 'Jr V JJ • 9•n t V O )• NOOpOV> ~~ YS Oi p Y > Yihh W Y i W ML i~f O <~J 2(ii• tOWN •• GN W O Ot YW ( N(M( MNNMJOLO • i( • RVi Z i Z N <W =WMiJ~J~Jy1 • Vi~1O W_WyyWWL Nh Y yo ! <YiM j V V .« I•~M~ JYOF ~2SLyN~•N „ Z• ~ O Y 5 i M (h SWYWf YO N•~J/NMV< f•Li(JO• YW Y iii O wY N N Y W Z 22 SVSMr JtfO(`iMLfff<YYYLiL O 1> i~ f~~~ h r< N =• NO•N000••NNw•PwwwwO•r•Nw O 'S• M T wMw• m ! •• • 111 NO•N•NOw00•wllhrhhr0•ON•N O 111 • • NN N w O h NMwwVN••ONNw •NM4w•wN••N yO 'O i w M ~w • NN Nw •••f••NT• • N •'w N M I i eoNOeNONwaNe•eeaonNNne•oYYN•ene•swoeeN nr•oweetlo nnv ~i~ •oe•N~nP~eweoNPanNe~eeeoNNtlfew•neNnNeWtlNweee•de eTOryhhOPhOa10°n°00 h_CNPN^neen.lONNnMJNrr yIM• JM1POONn00 OONy NN hnwOanN.•.e ~h NO100^N^NFei 1'•l~ NO:PFMw .• N nh NNn~N ww h hJNN :a: F N N hPie N w ~/ N N N `u O [Nw ~:: UYO s° s'• iL0 LMW ON6 LL J •OY JNOhiwOwllNaNOhOPO.INnINOhOwONNN•NOh)PONNn•N OI.OwONNn•N :'7 YSiSiii7i77S77SSS2iiiii+'+:+i+3:::SS:S::::SS:'•:::RRR~R RR wwawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwawwwwwwwwwwwwwY.wwwwwwww ii >o aaf••••••J••aa•••••••as•a•••••••••••••••a•.~•••••••• i~ I V O I L / SM NZ Z a ~e / i nWf h u M w eY i sin ° .r` v ea i e ~a ~ i r w ~. i ~ hLN in i ~ eJ % xw /011 \ J '`JNi ~ JO ate O f k Y r iN ~wN N{fn Nf0 \Zi S i• YN / O•. ZF 2 LN IN N(O h WJ pO=wWi NnN li W J FnYU a M• W{ i o~a`WCj w „ :oi r \NN J~ [)Z WOO O\ ON W MY ) iOJJ J'/ • N { • • S{OWS OS V.•M \W J Yi i ~ N V :,JOJZ • • WYN iFi (WNY ) wL N ` N W i •. JOOW N e••L W 1<NMOJ{NN Y iONZ 11y~NJ N ILW~r O / / :n { fOiJ{ < WO WNHJ i•fN ° 'JJ< J ) :JLO ~• ;~Y OIfL Nf WfIWYVSJ\WJL n . ~~~ ~ wLNM O yL iNNO\i\ YY%~ L [Y00{N Y /Ni ii0itli`I\S 7 iriflNOO LOWWYLONeLLiVJO L± i2 •N/ { SL N Ji)O{fiOZ •NNN iJ9 fNOOWYNwL O ONLOYNw YL/ fNJOy~ O< OZWLdY> 6 Oi\) if \O Y\M'J HJJ° /N >N•I.JZ ilYhiiLWN )NJY NOZ 00 WhMVSyWy MF V{y Y /Y/ UJY)fiNiF•ZihZW2rMrWtlN J NJJ<~YiMMNLfYWwVt \NNIYW\LWiYYnpN /Wt yFOWZfTWLYJ{~LYVVFNM iy [.NNYO~~r~Ji~ONtl~O\YWNLJWNOS 10r {ON iW„Ory `J^J[ J 1f JSYOYOYNO Wi0<NWL>OOO =W~OVVJYO r • aiNi Y f0 NWh{L• YOiNiWML~YwLNJh LIII [<i\ « iL /W a'J OOYNJYSO ih[NZO<hiYYh{~J iiON •Z.IIw)YOSMNJNPLiM)72WiCW YIILi• LV:YJMwYwYMVO[W NfY~{Z!0>{OONJ~l~NTw°I<OJNY~iNIN /Z O[N if` N N N i 0 R U N V O i Y < h Z h • I N Vt)W {U L y ZNO >ii / = Y N M Y iiN f Y NM < ~ OMf ~t • V V W Mh hrW[ H / [ L W Y{W ZfV „ Z N J NMO O q )Z O WY OSZ NYW W Nh O O~ NjyO ~t1f U Sx ~°OOOM i M bb CFJ. M y0Y <YYYYP N i W Nt~I hLNW VN< 2JN W O F O• i WWJ y / i NJN'J .9 h° W fVNN O N N IN NWNhhw • i O / WYNNN .Oi OZ i()fhN OW FJ{ OV<ffw YV Y MNYN iONifL pL LOiO O 00• JYZiiNVW~WY • J NO NWWOVfJO yOW'J `wN •[ w fitlf ) N ifNL fLNVw JL LOJ'J Ws ~I < Ni.Wp00 fYy1O ~ / iiW JCRiNO{pl SLWW6~ WVV OiVO JNJO YVVPWY •l i • • fOi tlUWNYwVN000W )h[Ow0(Z NWZL.1 f N hYM •<M {Llhf____yiifWWNIIW NiOM'J ff WMNNWJhf ff<'JiiY Yli Y N WM 00{LNhN WOWhiW) l JN Z iJ ~~[Yyy<OOWfY yI O=Nfff YN „fi .M Zff i Nh<NL\)MZW{i`~ij LVZNi ( i • • i00r1,f VVVVY • MMNMZNY Y O• UWiYYLOYYN000NM MiVZN • • w{i~ SYf /NjM JWJ OOyyVyyOO 11~~OJ <O(NN(Jtl ZON'JN IOi(i•Wtl)O YO •[i hf~t •LWWWY~• SMNVi~•~YM~VwiMY`IL iIWI JJiiIWnUiYYVMUJY NYI(LFN /SY f<f•Jf<ffif«~f<fftl~eOetlltltl(UWVUVVYYYYYVVYYYYOOOt'0000 • Q •{• ~n/OIOwwMtlOOIhhOYhlnn OM i.Y wNOP NI.N NwO•hONwNMnwM1N•NNh• Y0i <f Ntln•OOewNeOnOhOtlnenrONfw)NMNhhnOhtlnOlOawna Owe00h /0Y aNyOawNwNywINMNO PytlNNN nOOwJNw• nN wnMnNMP ).•i tWt a1w • • •N••.1• •Ja aaN •• • •Mrn • Yw• e 3 i ~o I e..enerweeonNeiaNa<oheo•eaeeoaarrohea.~neoooAeeoeeeoa •r• ONOa000F1•N OTOO<NOtlPOOwtlONO.ONNOle00100f0>Awe •C• MNOANNNONOOOPOOaNNONhO0Y1NANpMTO00neNhOONONPrOryAOT ~i araheowhNaaooelenwNAryNP PaNIP r N1~ ` e T T Pi ,.m .. ry ow :<hNwNNwwwa a .• e . . r n \• n u n N a .• • r N •1 A N r m iZ• 2• ~• •DY JOMOPO•YNAaNOhOwOyNAaNarOPOUNAVNOrOIOwNAINahOP O..NTI N'Y •Z• C MM.Y IVN ~11ry.~1 N~V ~~VV TTTTNATTT .1 .• NNnNNNn •I M X RR NNhN N R~RR~ 3R w U •O • NYI n YYn M NnNNnnwNN M N NNnnnNN NMAMII WR:R I NY 1 Y • >PwwlPwlPwlwlPwlwwwPPPwwwPPwIPPwPOllwwPlppwwlPPPPppP OIIVIIV•aa111VV1aa•IIIa1V11V 1111VaV111a1Va11Va1V111• U l0 • < LO VaR <= O < PM e ~ ~ ~ l • a T or li~ i < ~ r fv '~u = a i r r Y u o ~ h w r •r w i ~w is a N_ w • _ Nm 1 ~ A iz P • • ` 1" N ~ iN ~ j• rY OAi• J NMM Y O Y _ _ M O oW~ f Sr i \ f l O O • _ Z O O < L ~ N FM W j Li r M O \ •r W fra= i r d~~ sYi v: h w ~hW> na11 g .i•o~ .W. .i .>.u `~< •o V a J<n F JYI Z >rh N ijU<NOO N S7 J<~ W Nw: 1•i J I Y rZWirO iVL WS \NYr N Y • ~ YNiZiYfJ~ _ ~ R O i w ~ W <1 •yWy YWYWY< )V••hrwW Wyy N<iNW .NN IYONWt6 •W hOJO LlY<~iCNiihFFrOFOiJ <CN jL = J R <N~ IJWY Z • „ M OO VI W J ~IlNM~ M 0= AINY ~=OM=~rJ\ <O •J NNOOYO Ot J jL0 I10• 1 > ~ W l uw ~SJ N ~ tyN ••.• LVYUO'JiiJIZN OpWWN \wWYMIY iie h M•W N rl•r a>OWhiN000<ON< OjN> [r OJ7hf OM MO VM N rON f YL• _ _ _ _ M: N Ni LZJ ii[N V ~w<WW YNOWWW rN <NM N ' LAW O • JJWNW 6wW LOnWY•iMIyyW rMM hW i [ZWIM~M•N ll• VY WWS riJYiOW ZWM i00JiVOSJN OJNW~~Y Y%YUYi t J i YVi i n (iOrh\ V O JO N[< V LLUy:O f• P SNOV`N <NCU VfVW i u u IOY 1WW hN jWZ WY'1 W O Yfw W i YiWWWiYiW r[ O"J60•{OJMWYYYrfWNA>riiW67TJJW<OZO •<6pW000J>• 07 V OIMNiO ZiL i~J N1•{f{Llr<NINO 1•W OwVVYYW{JJLWNh MiYILLI•Zh •W• • i LWiO•J •. JhY IOiWWWLiiWI OirZhZOMrr`O>OfiO)irN9rWYiON Jlf CLiW ):GLUJJJ•':WYJMOL rr0[SJ ZZtYYi=NO LSLIUWu YYJW• WO>OI/Y~t( S>`` OOWrvOJWWIWWC ppUWW•J ` p ~ i K M • 1•i V>NUi ~Of Oi>ViVOf :~OCiijNOiZliOwi[Ji•» LrjOJNO I [ • • Y Y II N N 11 J J •~ s i • fu . • h •ni illii ~ < Sri euoi~ r r _ _ _ ~ Y>M l[ lV •U VNrLM1I V _ o uJraz v-+)-~ z j U ^ Y f • VhJ [ r t ~•h s •ZOOtZW0~~0 Yr VL • O•a • rYfY. •• ii l Y iV •O jOJZiIM f y W • yW6 MuwY SOWWW •e•S{•~ O LMfI jr W OOSY V•r•Zr<rJt >J MNLYN~fj VNI O:rN JOf MZw j9N • ~ Y :NOO 1JU >NWOVNrNNI•• yOL`uYVii VMO~eWM y W hY iiR 9Jr i>YIN rNj >OJVO OMfp Y[YWF <JF~ i `V •f • i • h{N > r>UO O>rNYf7f WOWWYjy>Ni~ 1rJ00~„YOSiJIO <YW )Y OLZr f > N jN Y ~ VVes• i OrNq ••i><Y Yf Y f i i U O`NSMW O r<L J ~ Y • Y • O = NZPWZiiOY f<f•.• W> N>ZJ N i {0• Jf •W J i YO{ZVNNNriffJ i ZiOWI ijV W<fr •<VN>Vfj Nl hOO U • ~ _ yy II y y OeFYUUOl~rt yr YO•Whi00N:I VN`h` •YNi ~{_ Mh•{J\ff iYJ Y 40 < •i1 F •O J W 6 YiwYWNNWJjMZifYJiO J<MW VMiYWY•JNYYOVOJ J hh•`M>~Y OYOi f f W u0 9> iZZZZ If<OWWi07< O'J 9>f<WM•.JOO[{YrJ i~1F •< f O S •j• _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OOOOOWWLLLLLLILYYYY YYY S SiNrM•YMM1N9l•••[YYItZJ • Y• • PwNM1OATaNNNaO•ll•NNaaOIYh TI•aPAY{VIwN N!•~~1frNOwl•OaOrYa001NM •0• 1•IwOMMNNNMANaTWNNwNVNhAiA1AwONTTOwwOVOwN N••AMAA O•I •INwN •i• •~wNaNN1101wMNw:011 ~~T TNMAOTwwwr•`.NNPN.•r Nlw wN•OI:NwN AIO•IAMYM ~101•A W • •>• l rN00000000aONONO000a00raaOrNOrTNaO OOONOP/OPODO r00000mPnNwmwOTOPOa00000rOOPOOwraO NOOTOOOrOnOOh P• f O~a~~H0000Na10PraOnOrP/aOnwVdr.nONPrONYNrraPNNP/ a~ewr~oO rNa^ waYnrrr~aT O wON m N Nx !! :~; NaT ~ ~~ „ O N Nw Na Ona O •mNlr ~ r io .. r r .. rr .. m . oa N n rv is Y iD: ~rePerNnaTarnwDrNmaNarenerNmawarYPerNnaNar/wernTaN :i: nMARnM S71 Y~.'ffiRF6r C.RNGR,^,RSMSNS7lSSRSS R~nXGSY1R °n$SS$°a 9F°o i/ i wPPwPPPPPwPwwwwPwwwwwwwwwwwwwwPwPwPPPPP > P aaP iiaaiiia s a a a aaa+faaaaaaaaaaaaa+eaaaa+faaaaaaaaaaaaa ii• J• O • i Yn u Yr a• • n i JP ~t~ Yr ~ w w °P R ~" s i .. i • o f a e T i t ' i ° e D °f '~ iDi r Y Y ~ Y/i ~ u° i °a i J iN ~ ` r a ~ w ti T f Y i J lir M1 FN r Ww S NI• Y sr J m Y a y 1f .1 IL N } I iY f O iY W> Y JW r i Z FWO Y~1 O W•O>W NWNYI Nw f ZSWZ OZw f ri 0 D •~ Z1 , ~M~ f>yWy VWY00 lj: FllO :lWWN NJp <piJwSNY W U\JN JZO iw~ l JJP • • ~1 •Z• Si e = »W V JJWIOUar O >6Z It fWi Il 10 lY0 a ~ IVZYaN/L l WU :GO ~N .N YWNI OJr700 Y 'rJ Or N •M1 M1M1r{Ly Y >a lrlfN V ~ ~ Fw •~• W f•O YVI ZNZNZO S NMT JJw N:N>pNaJO W i~ Y IyDOZwNWr 9 71 l T UW> W ~ Wr rwN iJWWlW~WL WWY~aWFZ •i l A SOY i rJ Ohl6 { l M M Y r~ l / ONNffIO UUWUZUW• NU OWiOF JO ;l JOY } OS N i 1 J U „V I I ZO fVZZYZ ZOwY :rlWb{ IW •JY~OW{ 2•/ WO 00 N N _ FW6WOYW>YlMiiM1iWiF\WiUZi{O> •ViM ~1^IO~wCl~wYjYMZWwt WPV Y •O• V ONNVJJVO>WWYWr W14 Yrf WVJ\~M rZNNiZY Of f 6YVJNrfN Z V V= OVLNSJFrNr'JYNZUOYrFOZNWNO ZYM1Z6 iJwJOra\M19 LLW JNF>90SZii lii0' JMSZ JVM1VN ~{ N~W~MOUW yWrWl YZ JOSZYl>Nr > ZMr>iY0>bN{M1 IYO~LYJNN;y2 WrWWp \\Y\O~{W\\i0 ~ {Z'JrJf rfWW>rW2YJrWrr OJw Nf MZ VfiV>Z Mf ZZZOiV~OIOYU~~ VYOiVZwOZYOrNWIYNNiJwUfM1 • U C N o . w J IL V ZO • • W~V \ 'J W O ~ ~ O Y y f •• V r O N oD O O r WW • • y y J\ U ^W Y ~ Y I 2 ~ N l Y Q y : N= Y r• N Z r Y Z W ~ Yw fir W O y ss J yya p Z N• YiV NW W 2{ q~2 6 ~ N • C SCJ S W NM1 O •' r i aV t N^Jr>O ~I4f >w >w J } yfjw V N { wl i Vj s _ _ W •O J VNr D[ r r r NfWNffG rr ~ NLL JV YNZ iN/N fVNI •e MYO OZZ VO WW OOM1Y> M1M1r W wWMi\YOU r~ M w IIZrWfV Z V Z{ W O ` N Vr ~>iYLZW:• ~ YN „MJIY IiWY>Z iJ<YVV9 DFO I ~ ~ p y iOVN •J Sf 'SDY•~S~rN ~N~$~ ZYJOY ~VNVOYU Of WOOf~ W~ViW~r Y ~ M iU > • V F ~Y~ Y W W • • W LL JWV {V DY• YU O r W O QN Y WIJ OO OUO • _ p p :1D0„VNMZIMFy i fVrY ~IW F7rfa WF O D r ~MOY iW Y i N M W N • NN l • I W V i YNN=fYNi Zf + ZZN r JrOOw iy SONp M1 yNYM\WNl N ~ ~ _ yF p ~j ZYMV•W VFNZO O N ~ Nrf rYN~O ti V/LiYN W •i: V;Z N VI 4VS MHY; i \•~Z rU OJ iZffF}VYY iY7iOFJYUrYWVY0Y6lZWW9O9Z ~flJZZVfV ~ •f_ jjWWi40\\IVVOp00__f_W__O ZY}f {f<WWWZZY9 ifff{WLr f/ WYM JJJJZiiiiZYt OOOOI\llllplZll6YYiYYYYYYNNNNNNN • • •Y: fwOwaNaPaTNNTaN y OrNw YM1MNarMrTOYNNO/OTNOrrNa/NO/Nwrw •a I NaNrNnrarTNOOn a~ TrOw/nMNrwwNONOaNT Y00Nrrrry/YPTaON NN/r~r~~NP wwNra»~r N'a PnNnONn T/TwrNNN nyN10/.•TmrTw a :~; , N N T N1 Nr a0 Nr NN •Y• • ~L> .P.ii°nnw°Nlennn°mw°a n~~e°Ow .°neeen a°il:m eoi r ~e~n w.:n«e~wr=~i.~. w lnewinewwrrlioewa whwwPNOwlnnhNNJaTN1e1 y n.. nhPF nP NON NOO NN NNr.NNNw f N .. wN N w N ujs O O ui: Vin O °sin V IL N Owq V LL J\wOJNTaNON•POJNTINOMOPO..NTiNON 71$$70<on13a:9aB1'f e"d'J''y7yyo<"J TO Te27"d^o >wwwPPPPwPwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwPPPwww oa11a1+1i11a11111111aa+aalaaaal ~ _ \\\!.!• w fw\ \\ e V N ; iW w v ~ r\ e wi • 1 Jf J N rWil 011101 yF w i~ 'V'. J eeoeeee WV :N > Doses eT\ ~WF fi N so °e °e eeooe N! o e o w p OIN1~1111~ •eY ONTO V N emopweo neooei ..e haf °riW •w s >PwwMNpw~1NT Y1ty WW N •f W20Y N~W• ~SNwfwnOwOiNFiM! iN2Ff w.2'If bJ~N h\bOhTw~ti1POYWlNlt JLM<hsW >~VO NV~~~ry~N10TT 1pW UWf 22 N uI n111N;NNe~uN~:0=lw;{UVWO p\ WhOw00000000.2L0 SWMFSNWt90i Y OTTnT n/IT TTT 'FIYi >:YF NVHWN IIIIIIIIIIW SY•W 2lJON Jp j0/. ..nOOwwwOTV00 WiwJ\OiMYN\W\N VOONM1FFM1YMIN\iwNeiVt2\iNhViNIL s eeoeoooeoe N yVUVVYVYVU W i ooeoaoeaoeN o sti f Mww~uuuuuYG VES OJ .P OOennpnOOY •••J ;VWWWWWWWWWW„ _~~ N=V i' ONw1L IL Ilw WILwwW fwWl Y.lSJiN hOW N \N Yr.N nN nwNN\ 7MJi iVW(IMN\N !o°~ddd::Y.iidC :d:~ Nom.>W~:GJ wW .VVVVVVVUUVONNV00 NIWNVw\ O1L Y. _ Fee1111~~i JJ YV WNNJ~iR{YYti6 ~WYO IlUi>WM\~pYO 6 JO W_W_WWWWWWSWs WWJ\ Y\MOOIf 'w2 N r4y hFIS'FYFFf hZfFy ZFWirMFJ02 ff .9 hJ Op p'J » i99f N\ ~ylJlyWNffW wMN000000000000•hh '\WWW7N\WOWW N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNFhTMhF>1iiNN PNT..M N.. .. .. n.. ..MNwNO h\IN~NI~tihrON O^wTTTTTTTTTTTMI.I\~H\M O.IwNNINNT '/ V jNP VfN p:_.°. as a° M 0;6 r tl ~ O V LL 1~ <• •Z11 •O• ~~i no>e •V• •6~ •W• • • • i • II OWE •i~ 11r 11 •z• eYi •O• •00 •211 •W •>• a n oNinooPOmm~a0OPOO0NO•~OONwPOOOO4~IP ••O OpnOAOa nawaNwO••N OOwOnryPnOONNpPa rvOnhipNPN rNn.no•aeNOm.•maNTwmwnmNawae p••weNaoP P nN N N N NN•• N4 O N•. .y 4L i'1nl S ~-~~Pti A n J~4Nnn~P O••NmaNawO O••NnVNOwOP TaNOwgPOnNNaNOwmPOwNm ~'I~SSSoEEEESZSE~aoEamao<d~o oenSSES8SS3S°o wao^aoooo66n°d ~o ~mmmO~PPPPPPPPP~PPP~~PPPPPPPP•Y•••PPPPPpPPPPPPPPPP•• aaV• aaaaVdaa• •aa as••a•va aaaalaVaaa•VaaVa 1 1 1 2 Nh < 2 Na R 2 a tlµ C y NN N~ „ W i W NP L Y P V F OJ i ~ aO • a W M N N< WWN:N N11.1 j •NN U J i Pm _Z Oa y K s yO t _sWW N _ •ia ZZWZ UOwJZ VN Nr << O <~ :NN V OLrW~ NP b y0 V yw0 N h VLW TWO~tl i N6p••YO V•• VUO i Qtl \ 4N Z 4 Wt0 Npib O `V 2< WU O DZ hN: MOMO4WOiYin <6 >zV > M NJN NF FwN NZ<W<N~~ J u0 OWW UN 6w~\ \J\O\YPO L\ \4 w tl Nc<O26OYW•O <OP OL\ 66NYOtla >204 wWWY ZN\MSPSM J•• H •1 OSOw <\Jw ZaIO WO Q4 N PN{ ewsw W LLy wJVbn L~ W JWSWNWWWWOVW Z NWN Ol J V ib_Z 66N1=aO iw iOlJi p4~W W4pD \PN OI o ~Wp OVNOJYZLNDM tl„ F •• O WVL ••W U2•}:=^ViOV ZOO NWf n< SOY• • • •t ~ V•Jhl• JOWD• a Oµi1¢~>NVW ~iwNMNVM V6VOVL{~ONWVW4ZyJ tl YP 4 m Wh2tl~ > O>NW>O>O> f M„67M>aN\Oi<~ _ iO6VW>IL2M « N<J0 ~6Nj=NLLN2NONM< NNfNF oYNo N N O M•[LLi F>iJ W N V< 2 NW •t J VLZ o_li y UFOO orV<4Nh•[F FZ F MSO4Dh4y Y O• O ZWZOwyL2W y ZVWV4VNVNW4VVf WYM >S:u NO V DtlF\F ONRw6LL« VVOaOwlNlOlU<RN <Z4J< JV< LLOO F W Rw VV4tlJNaZF2yLJLZY<6W<N6MLVYDaWORWOOw y~wj Vtl JrZ>w 2r_bw_ •_.O w_gWNFOi••wMf.6Orb 10 F> ~RwNW>~LL<WO iUaJLLZWw O y RJ<SJMLLDZN>SnMI 1 4= <NYWtl2OeO4J4WOW{ONy2ONOwwJDW }~~O<WSWOZNOm O U > •tiWPNDYrtrWMNULOLLUrtiJ WUNJZ6VV}N Vi64•[VMw••r• F 4 4 x uu 1n o z o} N 4 NN o a W o s rh is h i u o'Dh 4 Va ii•L ZN44 y J 4 io i- oi> a uz ri. O 242 J ZD yO 04 rw D ihu ui Nei s<oii Jrx 4Y yy~• Vw Nf OZ hN ii6pMZO V jV O YSOi ~WwrWWiONi 4¢OP WOWO Up OOVM•OiNiW YYV } p2YmO2ljw<I.ZW OZpO j<•[ OYWYy 4 tl N4 <_! wh'J<ll {Oj bij 4 >NOLt<>J WILFf< V LO i J •O W~:~I:YOI 2 Dw O jVVVhW •D JO Vy 2 O ffOVONfN • •2}n~fr •JFN •YOJN 4M f Z• O fJW M YOSSjYpryNH2M ••O N4• JO •O2 J•N•~j(S i~ij(~j(F~OYJ~JOYVOO f :V O PNJWfw6O2WWWlNl41 •W{f KON2~OO0JO6h:2OMhMItj~Y~OVV D = OVVVOJJjtj Rf{f <fWJJ66 W2yJOOOOOpJOJ U JJ 4ffa<f!!f<44tfOOOOOOOppppVVVVUVVVVVVVVVVVVYV aO ' MlwMhq~~VT1N•IOMNY•P4ONN•yPMnappNYNw~PY~Y•Np RN.OO m 001 • NM •~myNN~Nnn ~»MNM ~•m J Nw NaO•Iq P••N NN N • •1.1 N aNa Nr•N• N • NN • M•a iNpm <21 ¢I ~. ~yw U w \• SII J• •^• • ~ •2~ •f• Z11 ~ ; ~O• IIO ~ W • Y• VfOwnOPn)Om OPIO Twmo0000NO00000pwONO00pOPpOPNNmP000• pmo rNh OOYOONO mOOmrNOOmNryOVPPO OIIwIPTOImNnnhOOOmnONONpr~NhNOiNN~ImONm00 of hfm fs,mOOmPf hVNrvwPh~wfnmrvNNNnINaNmrNfwM•0irrn1lrrwm~rlmNN NNrrv n r rm n nN N r JmNOPmPOwNNINOhOPOrNNINOhmPOrNNiO P>POrN IIf NYFOPOwlN n1 ma P PPPPPO 00000000C NNNNNryNNF "F N'OOONN<00<wwwwwFPPPPPPPPwPhPPr'~~~Ftiww>PFPM1Y Olfff111f11f11iif11iiliiiliifii11f11f1111111if11111f Y __ • F ^O O• 2 OY OmmOi m U 1 WJ t U VH > O ~Wr • {i J N„POO N OY VOI • W I\ ` OM q O>OJm _ ~ \N !Nh _P m M O P iP!\ YJ JN i J~O \• N I11: W\SO 0 P VOy ~ \ ROi: OJ MLO iN~YY\ r 20 V 1•=fm qM NN iWON N O h W h U <_SJO Wiy \\IV NO_OWIL 62 Q i nii0 OuNi N_NN wJ ~ w O \ rrlj~ > iP H P O¢O WJ 14M O{ _ii SNO YY •>l00 N J N i6 YZN NW ~~r WWOON Oy{JVI NW N~ WaOF ii Piq 2 N ICYOM >1 W;WIW JYNY < FgJM•'ILL Wi1L N1uPW OJ INNWOggW~WO < Oh UYq OSY• JMOOOYiY.ilNh JN• wiF NILOONUiiM{ OZ Ufi 2MN'.>YWJi~iONwWY{iflNV W iWNN•, NS {N OWpwWNOMYOLLiNYO MLLNMh> W W >iJ WM1 FW{ N6 WJWNWWNgi >yJONWiOf NNJZUN O<„aJ{VNZSUSNY YOOyONFOON {O O i0 i USN OZi Ow2U m u Q VOhOwY FON{<nMl FJO I.N'< •Z: N r W NN<NNrO~ >WU¢:jfViNWVrVWW{NSWZVF WYO 0 o YU_jNUOFiPJ{MO O<O {u i<Yi„ayJW{{< { OY r r{¢u wwu<iWN•On •Ojy2 JP:S VLSpOU6iNiYem¢<_ NU>YYSYJ<LN 10000• VYiWYJYWONFNFFYOSWIYW OJrYN2wrY2¢1Vr lfwrfJJO«NiW<Vq~YCw~wk<~WOUOOJ~i~POMPOwJWiOY>{Yw<N rvNw000tmN t~Y »ygiVNV6MyJ4V>VU6 U2mGYC>iuNOiOmY< { N ~ N HH V J YN WW Y NYp fY >_ 2 hNN F~l J ~• ~ N a JJ N V wOY00 ~r ^ LYG _ _ _ O ~. ~OJr' ua F • OW ) JNiIOyW NV r_ _ F OY<{~O tLliZr = c~ ¢UhJ iwrt i~YMi ~ N OLYI..LL OOM < "~ _ rJ uNgYWYY~J UUJVY w0 ~W yy< MS¢m0 OO VWl Z Oy.:M UWWYO StJ < V<_VV NWr{YYrltY~f NO ¢yw1LMJJM< <_ <wl.l •1_SV O d NOLiNO OJN2<iN wf`SLLJJJJ <{ l ~YNf 1WVeo i J tVfsW wJ~ O 2 OYf<ON iiiSS• NW • Y e •2 SONJZiM F<MN Uw<••w YJhJV~D UI w2J •NYOS>O) OOOOOWSF O WO « F~iWNMO YZ Ui0{>JyW<Y •NfiNf JNI 000 ! f 12ii¢O¢OV ~rL2Z<N{O• {VJOFW<WrW<2>UwNMhrWi OOSi t {{< FF>UN VOf 2UNN¢FJVSOM< YiYrUiWYZfO<Y~ N VYVV<WOY<UUWNNOJLLINLLhMWNYOSiYJO<wWVYYYVJN)UOOJJJ20 UUUVU WVrY<fYOJZiYNNlY<NJOO<NJY¢r<Y\WMOOpOMSiiil OOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWggqWII UUYUYUI2S222222SNNMM•IN O NNnP^'hNnmmOONIrPOlnlif Off<eNrONPOOw1i NNINNON mm0 ONNNNPMnTPNO10NiniPNNwNNINIMTNONPrNNNNh N~PryONwINNN^<N»OwwNrOiPmPiPrOO NN^~OPY^rNIPryNMOr N • 1 N N• INrNMrMMM T N N /3 N_ e°N°n VmN 7~S Li~ V rr i0 °MP VJLL n. Piii N• \Y }• D11 •SI Ilr• w~ ~°Us OI oweaanmaO°ooerao cc°ea°cnw°e°eti°n~~enmeeenn°o.e.°e °oai °p ao °n .°~°e awi°°a°e °eni P"mn°'n TnmNOm°aa«.Nln°ehin+eo a~+inmw+°~rva m.N-erniP.e.n. nl .°1 °m .Nii.Ni r-mTp a N~~y OGaxN r w yaMyN N m m Nn y N Nyn hpun N u • a y N F NnanahmPO aNe}mPOyNnVNeNmmeurynaNa}mPgyNpPN n'a°,i F• aef+ nNy~ naaaeaaaaaa mmmora rFr h w hrhNhhfFhhl~ArrrFMhhhhh}hq}P~h1~Yl~rrfFM1NNNf-hh F PPPPPPPPpPpPPPPPPPPPpPPPP PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP OVeVaPaPVf aaa P'1 aPVaPPVaaaeVaaPPfaVaaaaaaJVaaf~IVaaVP1 m m mm • • m fm 111 m mm q W mV omN V i iNil N i N\ O M1 VF _ P J m ~[ O_ F P w ~J 1\~INhN m N iw P VN ~ _ N ~ ° N LLJ \rh0 }J Op V J .°i •C m m N m NZ ZN} t WN timtlOr Nif LLe i\O \O 2 mY ^IS IN `W °oh eN liq` w reJ J°P e W N ~ WMJ •M\ I ~f V_Y'NW i 2 i0 iuOWV~ }M Wi w N m• uWV N>Fw Ot w P w °ZNf)MY. N> Hq O 2 JNaWih 2WO V_OFV 1 2{ t N yN~`o:WiWW yy «yW WU Wfq t iP F`fY`N`VO 1 i J ° 9M1JmNY,IgIq Jw VO We }i JJPWV •q }i~mgfi~inm Nf :NN Y'NI I NPq u^ uq mY mlq_WIW IiWiY A 1. YY ti ./ f`Wi fi}ilOffV20=Mi M1ZNVQYNUN NgOlyrgWe~f ~ W N Om NOw N>_N\_ i IS OJ N}YN LIL}ViW MiVgVVJJ uNNmiu OiNO NjDf Z f 22N WW` gMWJNeN~0~}0gW f ~ W• « qF0 WN6W }WW61=rr{NW}• fNW iW V JV IV}>u q UN JOMNW VWNZJVWNY Je Yl. :e}OfYJMM=WNhN• Zf WhNRS F O~NiJ W m 2u \ IJ\q i S C Oafwmsgi w i04VNV ) OhNUwOh SOZVIM~VNU}O •ZW:u=u NjSjiZWf N~4Ww SNUin6W iaVOmmIUWWi iW ix}NN M VwuhVL' hVVCYVhfJNW1..f 0}f MfV~NWwZ VOfNNW nm>f 2jFOF 'JNUWNhNNNNVOmmSVZFN60RFNZN 1-W6WLMS O 006 M! ONO02J0iFNJiNUMMYOhiW iFS >x6fOD>JO}SOi6}JUV NZfV LimL>uJWWf mONyZZV1`1IZM V02V76Nhtl Om `iWYfhiUWjLiD OZU}INUJnL9LiU;P NYrhN>ai~JrAi6VNw62N l6 JNKJOn~(OYWVi 2 2 O _ } O > J i V O _ _Vf Z _ W V Y V z ~ u m t V J w w t o U P Uf 261V ~ V O N WZ JJVN V ° i Z> j Z} N JW OOZi O Z N i qsu 'n i ei ~ qu}r N e u EU : f J : i ~ }r° wi : FNS 20 ° rzsf : u} NU °VJ L00 hiai ZN mV t u }OWO 2 Nio w_ eiWLLNf6 WDWW N>. NJNJNU .Y htflN • il[ ~«jp Oe y sZU F ii WNeDf ~WUxW NrnlhYS iNN}Jm D• qrf: f I{W1 lPWW• JW 1JUNf>m' m0Y )__ N WZW „OPN}w i •L VPJ O_ ipNwY 1W sL Nw~s~ OVf iJJO Ffi J hY p6 ~:N J:;yV hWW ZN•}NVfWNN ~i •OfY SLiYt6 JWJ •Mfl •JMjW yZ LL O OiSHWJH~Wf=VNfViOtOWUJ6YgiJNMYgIM JO00°mJWJV~~W S~io~~~aeamh}Y3Nazusif z}zNgNwDJm~hh}aauurWUwl}ru J22 fwWNNN0000> UVWWUN0000'J fffWWMMO. Oiir\ 1[LYI[ItJJJJJJJJJJJJJJti2iYiiiiiiZjiLZijZSij22ijDg000• aaPUmNPyPOPOaNMNONONNNeNnmNnhVVNNONNNNiOhOmNNmuNyNn TOPhwpnNnNM1PN>amOnOONN}ONNOhhNNNVVyaNNffnOeNa mffNr• uNnNNnNNnPNYUrNNMarN NHNaHNNNM°uVNnnTNTNN}NaN PNH /~ I ~ ~ ice: Donn..N+earneamoaaDgeeNmNeembPbN.ODne+oNNJCmare !iM rahrOPOe+DnenrmeNmNo e ~ri M + w i = . i ~n . nri OO .:i oc nueoh. P a o. d a~ =im ~ N ma.ohPhNm ~ - n n Nr.IO Nw.b N N.. Na Obq nN n iry N~tl \Y6 N Mn r. N N w °Xr n N • ~ ahmPOnNNVNarmPOnnN+NahOPOnNnVNariPOnNNVNOrgPO..nN1Na 2 ~ ~ W°mmm'^'P^p PP 00°000Onnn n.. n.. nr. ..NnNrvnNNNNNmTmN„1T r rrhrn°me°m mmmmommggmqmmmmmqqmommrmmmmmmmmmma rrr PPPPPPPPP±±P PPP PPPPP:PPPPPPPPPPPPPPJ+JIPPPPP °JVVVIVVVIbi• VVVVV•V+V V'IV• VV++I+VJVVVVIV •'IVV• J i ! m m• ! ! f ! J N ~ H O :N Z V N \ \ I 1 ~z i < ~ VO NOU Oar .. JVm I Ono 7 u 1 q m e i a I " Y w ~ O iNP i N . O'1\6 N 2 JN r. rV J N NrIOF \ i t6 Z\aOS i..VOwNNO /~ 1 LL N r=~ nV r r Z O'i V2 NOPiO6F Ju J 2 ON J V > S W .ui .O „ DZN e ¢ N ~ umn ~ O W M.i Z eOD NO s0 N°I J JN O n N i O10 ~ i¢V NA> LP NNS LLO w b P .. PF rv rWWM /\i w n N <NO r>W \nm \f>r.. \w i piw Z VPW Om 36q . irJ WNm~00N6 Oa..° OP6YLL.[i Ji •• D. SS..NGw<NI Z NrnLLO~.rMI '~ ~ Nn _ ___ Dorm ol 1 f00 _ -_ - Whiz V 10ZJ¢gLW •U VN ~p ~. •OOtl°>NOr.W hV m2i tN r<MNR6LLWNnIWi W4.>i0 O<\L °i I rZwWO4PNZLLM2aNrJmOnJiOtlpt N ° LLuriW wWhV J mOr NN ..Lr Nml¢7r'. YS NMwOWVIi 0rW¢ONfO N : Il\GV •JJ OF NSN• W°IL~ F\..P Mi. Iw 0 N ..P ! = VwuwWP..Y .O fiJOZLLUJ• NIPf NW Y O Jj V• 60W<mw¢a0<OVJ •O •ILOWO/D<wOW rm..VZLLNLL iNJLLP ¢° NJ hZ > Fi> ILrYOFYiNb1O rV f{NNimO FpZrm iNVU° riw¢HYLO wrwnl0 W6 Vrw>i •N>IamWi N ¢ LL N~ ZNifN ZIOUiVSNJf VNOwVrvOVU U > LL u i i ONrii NYwNNNi »UON NZ SN ' wi OWr LL i O1PZ2w •I i0>wuipYOSa iVUr V r N>6JPwFL°SwY UfJZ<VU0\<6iUW11LJO..SNV¢ZY..NSVfJr OpWNNW¢W¢<'Iw OO¢ °JOONOJ¢OwUNaW<OtlV 7..rNUi-JNVi..J S S iN40LL.[°¢V¢ZNZim2YiVLLg4wUJPprV¢NaONLMftlOV¢LL¢0mLL<mi¢ . f - Y J O ¢ N L _ J I O VJ r N tl V __ r2P 2 F .ru ~ N9 iN 2 O f Nr SVJ° •iS1 L JLL Y' Y i~ o - : .Jw... - r .r OI V VVw2VJn YS WN r 1°U .< YwN w _ 002 ../rrN 2 IVZyMN¢Z r:p V • YyJV.LW CmMS°O <>~ Z f VO°<VMO tl ON• ~ Wr Urmw ~ WWtlf/¢02ZtlM ON °wrLLS F UFO N Wwo 7 gy 0W W w UOwm mwOOVJNr rNOViN¢J m'" N..'s>oa.°.I~~N°wiius<aiSrc rn oirYiw~iomir"~.J.i °u~u. .r.s ~i~ rs Y~ 6J0 20? J ~ 6WZ V r. w¢i22JLLUr >¢ •¢<WV1[06:MW W -~ •fV2 r r w N ~ • r M JF .WraHD/N0¢ gWWrOi LL LL >J°.wiZ2f N >J• W NUF iOCi N VVSOipJV • MN~O iV°Nf OV!\i.[ I MJrW .Nw6NtlOVNy Z..00J¢UN » Nf WW~LLDJ !r WN>~VR..• iip>Of ~WWZNtliPNr WWWW'J220• wtly OiWOiF<VOSLLw OOOLLq° y L> ~ •Y• j VWWWO fi iLLrONyy p.[N; U=VitlV t..LLVJ iVN UV°UmrVGF iNDw~m2ZSyr 9YJJZZ Wq< • WOVJ2MYWp1y yfJiY Yl YN G NN •S~ tl CGLGLL\pPiC OOG6¢iZ¢g NNNNNNNNNNNN NMLrrr'J 7'J» > • ~ Nar N O pO Pi MT w O ~ J I N ,O. V.4+mn ry O w. n 1 J gOV.. O r Tr.VaWNNP'L NOr PI.1 .iNNN N y .O• IIYi NO mnOTNaNNmNN P •N.1MNN mOMOOA+TapprM.. >1 ..OrJNp..r NY1 NM .. '/ N N NNa NN NMNawrl TN NNN ab NP CW• •>• /~ O SNP t~-+ V¢fl _n V ~• OM K Oj6 °W u ~E ~: :i z• ~n ie a~z i¢s ~a St N1 :wi ~ 111 w~ ~W• Ili• ~f~ •¢t ~o• ~o• .zn • s ~N%ueom~n'osmn neu~ririaaer:No JhOwoyrvnaNVnmae eZSa m'~me~~oo cwwaawwewam oiiiavaaaaaaaa• •• W_LL u e u J6 F J + N 6J OF ¢a ¢ fS J Whs NW n a O~W 01¢J i¢ J ¢O ¢V• •LL Jh S V i ~ h CiJW •~ eewa mh Vl¢ ¢N¢¢{ONa au .°.u ooirN° LL°o .h., W N27rINYaeV NN>e9NSWFLiON ¢WJ o~JhWWWN aNVNa¢SAVN~¢nY G = w N N h J O N e h V ~ J_ O V _ 2 ¢ ¢W S I4i OS aw "_ r¢~eiz.NiN~u ~a~.w.ii:~"aa ¢OSVVVZOh VJ~MO UVLLS O__ ¢ •OY hl~ ¢ h~OYw N S4 WJ¢ aJ06wOOh1~F1`I jOY NJ¢¢MJJNNMJ¢~'2 >f 9ffffifilaYY :o eoti~eNn~~rh.a e~°n anwanarannNNNo as n a /~ C iNw ~{n YYO Zl u •• {oy FLLnO OIaJLL 1V :: iii \• \~•~ o~•~ o: ~i i tliG_i ~ ~ /Y Itl~ ~f IIZ Y Y N~ hs: ~w~ ini w i ~~I 1Z• °e mwe°e ~•O°NwhGa o e nneo n e eehw•oeoNFNOnne i °o wo e..ehNe o wow+ eee•FeaneN•oNwe v. a r..~lwo o e •ItiNn r «e.iNw~w Me N N r ¢p}n¢ n N •••MOOINwaONw O O n NN +N~rN•NNw N nN q NN awON ~ Mr N n n n n n n n n n n • n n n n n n n n n n •• e • en•w•e •ee a ••e• e J aNaeweNn•rrh•woNNNIr+nlr+nyanuwe o..a nnnnn•NrN•we Ny Ny n•l nN apn W NNNNNNNNNHNNNNNNNNNNNN'nCO R1ilE EESSA AID^YYYYYYYYY°COO°wf 011•IIIa11111•••IIIIIIa1I••••IIIIa11••••••1•1•I••a•a r wlwl 1•I 1 • 1 1 1 • 1 1 Iw • i w O NC •W Jy w+ C N r V ~e V • •M N wO1M N\n10N r 1 U i N N VOW\ NPrNN) + n N _ • N i e Nf • O YOiw ONwlwO MVSVW V V 2 .~ W WyV\V vtl Y S ViV Vr p V V V W_ N nViVNV VV J V ilOi S VtV=Va r vNV V s N h f h „i S{ O Y Y V O C h w Z Z J• 9NfR NJO• n Y 9NW M P f f : Y JV_ V J O f`Ya9`W fZ0 W J ``Wf >\ y) := Z { M V 11 ~)[S N~S WW O ~ I~~N M \ FY Na°OWe { VW W a {y°V Viw^~a YF N W OON w ~~IY NuWLLw f eW { f Z YNO NWi 17 iY V J YN•J OYa V^i00° t i S W V nJ s}oo1R •u tl l N• W ~ iW° tlus rotl ` e Z n NV { rMZ S O Y yW S wN u V i O W MirW W I•iN ~) Y Fir h t ViOYVV WYFW W ZMOZ N+NNOFia° i iN • h t YWYJielLti ohi 6 Z f •O iiMYeN W f Wh>yi O VMfWi NN 9W} _ _W r VYR+er Y SWfW W S~OZtlaWNS\wiY>_ > F WhW :WSWf VOO O • J NiWr JZW V all V • iu• h Y efWW YJYOWVS{O Z N V W eY Ji> M W Y 7 fWhrOJMVMJZNV6Z f V YVZa hNf ILW°hON N N !Vi • ~ YWV if>/JW JMO y a o a of>tl izNihr}o+ a•Ye i eiwtlNNtlwws~eNWs Y Z t Y lHai V)JVSNSIOIF L Y ehWA U> HUWVItl•FNn ~IiV>\SOY tl i O u i _ { > F 1 = o x s V ` i r V V O f {V _ _ w _ F tl W j S } y { ~ W W = N W N Sr Y ~ V Y J WfO O J MOV O ° _ M l y J Stl N i "J • O U W °aWN • O w JJti Y f N Y flfJ ~ S •O• a r n M •ETA ~i• N w a nNNr •>~ •O N O f L1 N ~j N lil } uuN it fl iho u '~ ~ u •LN O O tl VW W M G tl~{eu i i Nw ~ °Ni NZW tS O JG NO Ni •}tlw0 ~}' V tlyN~ i ff WN iN ~ ~WZ P 9 N Y WV J~NY tli0a iLYw i N' M i% <YYf LMfaW )>a•i V • M W n Ot ~N Jf OOJn M i MZ WMNOO WYNN Htl tl J „ ^S O ZO NVM iN O OTW nff N \ WM O)f fNf YJWJ 641EY6:".Y. I au`I 1fWNGi~rdS.Y+Mi9Y..N O• fW0 WL N N YS tlY Ff tlNf OaWWr 'Ii)iY •fa W ff • Y `NJ :Ni.7iWf VJ e}IY tliJi! W V NWft Y N WfE fJ SO\S~ NNE Wi Y V '~ }OVY l tliji'JZVJYYtlNi WI ~j~j }Nyyf W•NM • fa}00~iY NN Wp fGfFhZOW~ tl IMtl WNM'1 Nl~~ftltl fV iYis1NN)• i eaWW f f NNJT}f YVWTVYYO< Y\YVlYNf1 VJ J r{rf J f •f~t\~f ~~~~~f~~ NwNNn}Ilr11w ° Vann n N NVn)Oenwn Nl°l1N ~w• NS Ow0 NO O T rywry N y nNWMw)w MNN RNwN • a T N N I1 • NNn •N f O ZNA f=1 VWI q0 SiN (00 ZeFiw N4 JO V LL s ~6 TONTaNFOPNp0000000VtlTONPFO00pTNOiNfPONF100010TN0FFO PO., NnaNOggygpfN PUi t~:OgiO N'/1rvp~aNM n_NOe'OVVaNOOnOOPTN P.IOIFNTNMOT OPP=tlNNaFT VOTfOTJPN PNON~~ gnVN TNOnNFN rygN Ogill NNN N w NT N TN N N w ~i~ •q• I~• iFi iq~ •O~ ~Z~ b JgPOU~NTINtlNiPONN TiI nONgPONNTIPgNiIONNNVNONiPONNNINtlFO weSCCeLCCLCLLSSSSgoSfe S22992L52 L'II Pq SR°P °P28RR&RY:S'w P'w P'wcC )PPPPPPP)lIPPPPPPPPPPPPPlP!!PPlplPPPlplPPPlPPPPPPPP! OIIi111iIIIIIf11111f1 « <IIf 11<Itl11VIf11f1V1111•11i11 W_ Y Z Y f ltl iq i f l iW q! •• i • •• Pi J J N _ \ Z N N NN i i • N q N f NW V P N 10 N \ a Z \ NN N \ O U F N~ T { r i N Z _ > \ ON W w SN i J x •: J )uw w Zf V!2 FIN F .LZ J 1• W i\Y iNW ZO i J iONJ p l F YZOWWJO„NV f_ZZ 1~ f qJ ON2w ~ • 6 NOJf{~) W iW W a0i 2 l O NONJ ONY7 Oi >Yl2NNw NY FY OY i qJ ~L~M W~v~~~ u• LZ)Z ~eNONW< NNi ZIWW ZZN9 O pWWY V f2WW \n 6i J NN ~ NOWN NJO „2„f OWNN O u) ON=WOtiV)W •OIiOWFWL w+ f00 AF Ot u W O V N_N ~iWNOfF ON 1•N NIOL yi ~iN Ov~6w(YjiO~ •• iYMN~ NOI iW~ \F~fi)iVOH•u • IZNZ JVIZ7FWYOOi• W V W 2 ZW JNM LJIN NOW W• :• OfOZq O WJZllN Ni• jOOVN gfNZ•J `` VJWN{{OLW )wf V:WNF1uNii Z~ MY:J• iNf JZWn•MO6WfwONMyYN~YWVOUW•in J{V N OOWWwiOiFNNwLHFZWJ12f2NOJWONiONNUp•2iYWW• {KVLL a2)VZVJN601LYO7ZYFOWZZ7J MNJ WL OONOVNJOVI[OWZWZFN• j`WN{NJiiCOWJiNNN2>RNlJOMtNZaN>Z•OYJINI\OOOgOWW2NNZaqa LLVNiLLZS7VAONVWi>)ZZrli~iONrNOHOVYNtNOZOV~J>JO~FVM)T V_ ~ y 6V ~ NNW W• V JJMN S U_W <« • J VY F yY ~ U O J ypULiiw NV q WY •FNY f_V_ !2 WWVJW• QY N FfNV y~jJ Z W ~~ ~_ O 1fMWZ H NWWV_ WV JO Mi0 N (ii~Vi J Z~ WY NNN NLN u JF •V WW JNM L WW YO f • O <` <N2 L MNU OZJ~ eLLj F W •NV N LLO O 9 FO fF W000 ( „ '> FOJ„ 00 L'M ~N i»W fWfi ONNFNOf sV 9ZY Z `N`O iL F ONiFZN yMWW•+F W( S rZW~3~Zh N0[F J\IVVWVFOMjrVJwMjV~6 ~NOO iNwNWUWN !3F) Y• h(oWiNWJ w(NNNNMFYfUOJ) • V N VW VN„aNiNi000• W9• • 09 NWLLUgVOVFWi••YJ{qi L N )fWFI(L WOFWFVff ~iN LlOW ( iJ FII V)WUVO VJl ) WOf JN i< •i'J9Y O•p OONiJ WWW \NNWi2V WNf NWii)YWNWVI~~{• •hNYp• GJOf ~( ••NOi iRiiFOe ZNNNOfNNi IL ONOi( JWlWfZWZ V•JYOLlI W9 MOWZ OZZfO~WDiZF2 NO~i VWNff YNZO UNNNWFiiFNF ( L{f NLWLN••••JiWN OZFh J•{•WNJOODNY•~{fffiWNNN000000DOVWNNNNS•O(((iyi1W JJ00 POOOOOWOOOOOVVVVYVUVYVUVVVVVVVVOOOOOOOWWWWWWWiLLilli NI OIT1i ~1~FtlfPNgwF1Plf~tlNOrlf w~wlfiTOFTNNON N•N•HNNI~O~N~H iw P Hti T!lNN~Ptltli1 O N<NON< NNOgNNlNNNNONOOPlN~N •N• N T NN• • TN ry N NgNN 1 is~ iii •Y• ~O• •01 •W• ~> iN°w ray VOn D:~ Ui <OO tl .. ON6 ~JO U W ii: O.{• \Y m~i• e~ •a. •f• Y~ i• •~• •O• ~{• o ePeNeeeaNnwePeNaaoenPPwloeewNaoomowPwoeewoaeeee »D•ea0oorewoowPNreooanowNeemgePOOmean•eoe»owDeee ••j0»=a=00NOaOP NTnOwNPnPOaNOww'Y rPwNw4r®wYf O'J'Tgap •p6 1NrvPNw1 w Na OweN~^NaaN r~NTO~»MypNaOasN»~mONq» » r1NN< ••q r• NY •• ••N NnaNanoPO»NnaNaYOPO»Nna N.+>wOwenlNnlNawww~~~O~••yyP~~O.a»N in gal qqP •1.O~Pp N NNPPPPPPPPPOPPPPUpXXXXSPgPXXOPIwIPpPPw~X PPBXPXR F.P wIPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPOOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPwPP oiaraaaa•111•11•••a•a•ar•Ia•••Irr•r•ar•aaar•••aaaaaa V •z » W W Wtl LO J N N J u P\Y \ N `i • M t fOaO )~ n+y Y W_ O Y_ • OP + YuY J: N P• V •iW a J rNr 2 N M• zM N t OW O NJYZN n \YF • aN 3 ^~ e0. J J tf NW a w Y „Oa< V Y Yy O z 4zN O zWWWW tlW >y W OJS JZ I O W•11 NfeY O YW ID> 0. JN YO W_O ON 0.m • • SSN • z f • ~Yr U 6 » M O)YVO ii iD ~ =W=. y L`D N°O >°J•u° eiu V!N Y a W si VMN • J •WM N<OYWj JO i NIYUDNN0. <Niii lU N ON» J UWe••uu Y O NW UWW NzOWN10 • W0.JW\ i N• ~ '>~yY ~• U 0.O O\NNiO Yi O4aiWfWN w`r l• ON i1N FW OSJJL FWiV NJ20N • O JJ<J••ONW••9 i~ ~U ~, Z ~•~000.SrOY YW»f V~Y1 r •Ii~O tO Z,I ZYI ai0 V\ YWI ) O OJZZiNNW OYwMOi ~ •000.NYON~WW •OO:IN r0Y0.NZ OP 00.00.1 NW• W NN • Y JtON iZW ~ ZUUWW IL Ji1L •W W•v yW~yD DiNYDw•WWgWF• Y U00.WY~ •W\ u1iZyN W~tl Uu>i>DV<Nwi i••sWNU0.zV\ NJiOW• z J O < OMY2WOWJiNOOV W i zOU OWWZWYWOYZOYJ )>JN OIY Y3+<zN0 NV? )t0.`O<WO•L YWOiO. O~NZS Il OfNO 0.n•fMVOiz N1 • iV iOZWO2YWZ Y•IIyy„^00 < 06WWilODWW JUS yiOYWONWy<w•.lu<r<zO~Wi < <iJ ••SiNZOYYVy60Y00< SZNU0.~vYwWw J9NNONiV1 •NOWS iL2aWazP•• O»Ni Z••N zYjVOWW•[Yw>ZMViI 6JYZNw N1..jON01 r i0.NZYrWY0.iyj fh)WFWZwi•r0.iiJJW<jNiM 9>waZ »VYXSJWPNUO••i L~OMW)i NrN•~Ofi•NOUjSOilZV20.OVNOitl~WON~N Y N 2 { Z' ~ N N 0. w C YO O V Y Y V WO i pi J r3 O7V V Mi O N_ i J'J N _ •V NyV2 p 9r { W 00 e '• Z Fh •O _N C 7OfN y~ •• • ~ YMr N 00 NS G JY •MOii OOWOVfO Y N 1: JOri < Nh:ON Nf ~i OFIVC __WW_Y_ ~NYJ» WYiNOWZ i yVWJ OUYN\O • >Or ZW>12.y W~fONJW ~WY•YwJi•iyYYiiH FLOOD •NWNVY~~ MJ~zW 9M0 ^00.J~22 W;0.iJ0.0JpYjVw6»J N OS OO•`W WYJ >VO•N fON M MOY e « W<hIiOZNNOJ iW WLJViJVYYN J •ip •O)V~:CY000Z~SN<F0.i><OyW~O~Z U<0.zOU1W OWV NV •JNO\_X X_ yJ Op•>Ji Yi ~OlJ01 i+•00 •W_ Y2MC WY11ii~~''W ip2NJ>YW•J •]Vf NYfV W•/i OJWYUOjOff~WZNU VVVMYON13FIV YO<a ~fzVw•J•N •O•w l JO2iaWW VY)JN>UOYOVJJYOif iii20wii fyFYYNt wUY~YOYr rWVVYyYViSLiLSLiLrwyw•ii hiir'fYViiz%JJJJJJ~JJJii~itliiti ~Y+IN~1q~P~Y0i1aaTVaPOa00PNMOPOiNPAPNaNMnNMN0011•a00~aaNVa1 OagaNJNYNNOONN»Oaw rP NNMy1 ~IOPFMnOOnNrmO•„WNNPOO••Op w mrgN NN»Y M NNM •IP ryNNA N••OM /9 V_ !Nw 1 71n giY nOn O•N^0 J¢ •r• LL U E ai . oiii w~<. \. • m~ \• .i• r. O• . 2• '¢i •pi .:• •<• •S• . • . •o. p1 NI a1 •iY WI rri% • ' . i . . • ~ . ~ • . . i .(. ~a .i• i I ~O~ ~O• •(• •W• •>~ pcw'e was w,NV Oaio°pp°°°ei°ioe.noen,°i°na.aia a°nPee°eon eo eo o °e x.°. .o•n Pe p+rw an .Niiaina aapaa.aoepp«eaeeN¢¢rNw~~NnN-enNOCPaaa.NN•eoaaaN m>YNNNmNNNNNNm«rNammnN YaorNNNaaNN..aneYaaNa<rreeN« -• NN NNNON NN Ya•• nN wn OP«~•Yr«NJwTNm•• a Naa NNn N N n„ N M ~pY«naNa•-f woNVNnaNarewoa.p..NnpanarfwpNNn•NarfPO.NnaNarePp waarw^w.r,e^.w'mera'.RPPPw P•P PPPPRP Y.S&&'$&°o 88S888888e'eo Ne JO ON JOeeJee Oaaa••a•aaaaalaaalaa•~•aJaaaVaIMNMNNNNNNNNNNNMNVOiN wNN Y _ _ _ _ V •\ MN • Ofw OfOtl¢fN •¢Yffff00 U P rUV i i • \ ~ ¢ s a 1 J V Np i J aJNO O \ <aN•II r nWiPO .r MO «INHwtO VLLOIP O rr I rOaN\\rJ a <Nn Yi W 1 W~ \NMLM Pp OJ \ N ¢ o W W rN Nn• O N ! J Pr V J 1 I !W Z U • VaNM i YN e• r10 ( r Y O O i(WJ<NZ N o d ..¢u zr:i n Na 19 ~ Y e WNOr^< W~ ¢. .:NrNrr n r. u it a °o O O ¢W<OWZJrO SW P: =~•i ~i V Vi N 1 I.• ~~ZWJ NJP V<YMVfWOVJrWN -"'•'•"' .. .. .. <(N<w Y :.r .f YJ viWO FN\\_ sr O r POOOOOOOTO YY NN•.Oyr:YO«i. r0(f 11 f. VWO ws O~M1TO ai•rl.OOn~I OWLI >N tl OZV (>N p 6 ryJ fi<.iNO Wf NNOONNnrwaO pO SMW ¢ r<JYO Li'J JW ^\ M.NN P JLLrMinOa0000•.N1 V WOW W VO• W •J rr Op • ¢a Mr • V Ni\ i<Oa.•nNNONON00 WSZVUN=s< . •iZ wN N ZrfNN~ OM~YI 1111111 1 W ri .Nf>Y¢Wri. rJ~r .WMy inW O rrda<ONOaOPO OS< Nr<NWOp BOOR OCMW 6 NV¢>t yN\wiV ('J N.•n n•NNnO J~OOZM:W~JWWrpWW SVpI ¢WOri6NOJW0 at W r«NNM«NNr•NSO JWjrrJ(r < ONiNNWYNipMw¢OrsrNr¢"W>IhrOWr000000000Y0 li2OrZV NOOJJJJ>i. OWV¢~jhiZWiWN ssWYwNnnnnnnnnnnn ~Or<YjOf J>rOWWWWOZN<p9W.ilO iiiYrWJWr\ONGaONAMYIMNHM~•.IjT OUWViNUiO\N<OZiirUJi7O¢rfCNYpWVwr(aiNVVV000aa000a0• y r_<_r_O_<_a_t_<_<_ YU JJJJJJJJJ NM V y rtrr«rlr W • M JJJJJJJJJ ( Zi (J YMNNNNM NU• Y O •• (N _W W__W _W Y_W_W_W_W_ r > <a Vf O O = fY: r VJ i( U NNNMNNNNN V N WL Y i>W •N [ 2 NJ NNNO Nor VJ ~6 J_ iiiiiZ33Y O VVViVNN WWO Nr ~~ILWM G..'FFCCCC W iz No WJU NL¢rrsz YW(O rfara<<rrr •v S rV NO OYYUi.V•in (SrWWFr O.U•i 6(Y }111111=yW p 22 Jr OWWWVN)YNUNON(i(G fIIYWWOr •ii (ii 'll ii li li < N•• aNNNir(Wr((2 •WW (oINN<W• OP0000000NLL VqV O 'j W) Yrr W~lpOVJ OOWJNNNMNNNNNrn p~~ppSGQ N ppOOMNOW p e `` VY` MNNNrV~1 ~ji Or ¢ YW i000{ N-OWZWWr SOOOOYWN~OOOCOOOpp W (MtMOr (/Y N0002(SJOrr(N)>( •OVVVV (~ WWWWWWWWW U MVLLOW )VwNU YWWLLJrO<¢::b WWWw~Ja( OV i ~ ff{JVVOfrMI(NIMNrNO ZOO ~.OiOV .Y~i~W WJw1Y.•MwMHFIN MJi YN(J9r•fWWNI O• NNWOU(N NNi(fV`( WWWWWMiV JJJJJJJJJ<W rNayOylIpW WIii~.(Niyyi ~~(IIi O• VVYaaaoppNrrr«a«arui MrVSOY<WUVM•s000VLO7Yi~~ONYr)<Ui W6~000VUYVVU ; i20000000>(LLwLL(>LLYLLOG((f(•(YYYkNNNNNMNNNNNNMNNNMNNNN ~NONONAIN.•~/N•rll••.rAM.IMi<~TMN~OONif.O•nOi-o 00nawn nlN•I n IN111N•I INIi IN•I lNil l•I .wiM NNnMnwNNNNwnOaOdnNN NNONyyMNa•^NNnnYNNN•a•MN~%MwNwnN we °i o° eo° ° ° n ~ ° ° inm~ l ii: ee o m e e . . N . . . ooze +. rloe wi o .on+ n +Nen - r Nhq~1m NN R• \~ N TN MJ •ill w F; r• ~i O • JJNT.•NVRgPOJNTINVRgPO ; 2• WINO NNNNUUNTNTTTTTTTTI 00°000°OOOY0000000 0000000000000000000 •f• °NNNNNMNPNNNNNNMNNNNN •9• F LL. LL Z NS • V Yf J M1n zJ ~ ZO y0 O O ~ OZ Wi •i Z • + I f P TL tNM O p ° OZwZ fON Jf W Y N .orw fn ~ i ~ ; i ' \ a v V fiJ ~ ~F \ W u I isf YO i~r • • NW M1i\P •M V__N ONYi ~ s6J ~\R YO L N~ M IP ti LL~L;S i F • ~ O s M1 Li ! •y OIfhJZiYWLOhW9M Z °NZwZrW OP `I UN N i_ ; + Y I i r p J •6• •V• N6Ji\Y O N I ~ 6 w I i 6 N OI N fOiNYW O N W w O LL •O• W[JJ< UJ+Orf I J 1M1° V : : T LFP4`yTOJfONrNSRJ W T6 YiLL TLJZZNJW9g0 fOpOOViJf YMWMOgO •Y 71 NigLLO LVYRIOigY u z J s • V ~ N N Oi J ~ p Vw i O ~ ~ O• CM ON p MO i YV FU WZ u+ ~ Oy Jy_ J\ u°I '1 o W W i sY it aV '{ YYw W Y • W20W OV ff W>Yy.VO.YV JM1Z YO N r •V ~9 WO N q IN • + VV~~ + ~J• tYZ OWt~OJYJ~yWO{wOJ • M1I JfRYJhr fZWliJL° V ~ WNN V~J rJrLJYO Y WOM1 iYOWi000MM NL ~ ~ 6J6LW LL9 VZ Y • W\\ h W lOOOY •i!Y J pp J YVS ~r SNNNF~MJf YOM1100Y •[• JW.ZF! NJnJNYJNJYf •\• LRpOp~~i ZL.fr\WWrWW •Z• NNNNhyO~p'J9» iiiSZRM ~ ~ Y• hOfPN000NlpdPTTgPOP\ •O• NNIhrJNNNNgI1N OJNwT00 •O• TRONaMTTNM\NR»NhhNNy O T •W• Y-/'aye R Y U Z ~_~ N Q Z N N rt' ao~~~_~. ~NeMt~llde /YY AIYCIYISIC rYAaM ~p 1. TflfIA w 0(AlN9) Ie! Hp. ei V6bIf~ 9 ~ q1 8At 6 Keel! a M1tlE ~" I .a,aa Ul. PSale ~~».wa..r.. w.... , 6AT11q PLACe ~~'~~ 3e15 COOe t~dw. t.d w~rheeww~bA ~ t. NuAf(A 0 Mv44Nr(A iep. A,nrl B ettp 9-11-90 to BROOK! i YACK• INC. AppNelwb Se[1904 ^ fepeFe eae[aauanaa 1-9-91 Feeagn eab: P-12 San DieVO 9. iffFlb) (M` RANSACTOaItI {ff lK. bK PebOn TLanata[ 150.00 U a qve. d Wig !.:aawm d p.,ina-NUebp. avi Seew d 966 eootAill etvd., eV ite ~ cM o.d Tq f:e+a cwrM Pancno Cu a 91930 Ban Barna[di TOia{ t 150.60 _ 41 6 ~, ~. .evwe to anwwn ney a~-+wh~ vb anon i r..~ ' 199b VSa de 1. V U P1 •, r v. Mon you ww.6ws p«,111e/ d e ble.yl 10. Man yw e~ ridplp! aM d Itp phi:ieb a /,. •katella nn MmnM CarnM M a uliq b M Iull ~~~ a M~nppernhd Pw' 11, fylon a'yFY~ ebww b Mw 9 P le «m albtly+N what iwll M Ma.N pen d A epPl'a^ev^. tt. aoptiamp eap+ Iw d.a «t a«.Paa e+Mepd • pa..r. ca.•aaa p«:a...w ten dl L. a e rw«w, ve mr x:.r f..r,a .41eb o ehw e. pAli b sa daierd .n a xy ~~~ a ~. albtpn, r,.e~ce.~a a,+. u. sun. a cu+weNa c,~«r •r __av olt?o._.__,_._..____..ab._.$1ic39._._.__.. ~ u.a. ,rwpr w ..:.., ..e r.- .... ,k+-, ~.., w. ...v .n ~~~ .. , h .r...,.. w w h ..w-., .., ..~.. A' .w.`w.r~rr"~w...~.. ~t.~wye~ .w..~ i'.. ~:..w +~,r++- „a.~ : ~ ~ ~~ ti i."r. .rw.. r ...,. .... ~~.. o...... ti.,, ww .w.....:r .: ~,.. ~ .,~.. .`,` r ~.... . i in aY .~I,r ~4 .. nwJ h +p ~. w w w Mn n ,w,r. uw,a +w .w. r n.+n R: yrr ^- ~~hw i, « n .Wr h tiV. . M1M ~.ie i4 hwr~ v w .n w aW'w a err ~, w 1w w" ....w a, nrti.w w w ~ 4ws~. wr -~' ~hw. 4 Le h grew wMwYw ~, . ~M,. 4 ,Mr. h .MSn w h Ynw ..A n ~r.n iMwr F SKaf Mq! a ~• y ... .... ........__ _.._._._._._.._..__.._._..._..__ . ._. ~r rr«: 3 -7t:~ ' D ~-AY6•+1Hr-iK--,-.:~:'--'---'._..._.__coFleb tunfo.~-'- '~ O-:+wdf«d_~.___trtr_,_._..____._._._,_.._ab «.._,_:.__i..Jrrsr ..r.., n.~a •w, as u/eKI1TYk1 eY TeANYtlROe V. SlAif Of T.UIfO1Rea Cwrr a..__...SAY.111G'A______________._0aM_.__9,-13-90 • ,wY,r..al~ .w. rrw h+w, yr: u,.. wax r rr: ,~ r. L+wa ~w/w wlw. M -aw+r w .w w wlw wpyar ~~'.+MMaal, ~T u w..r ~ ~/r yy ..mr. Nam ~u h..da aswe aw.4+w u u ~w+...,r. r. w, wrv+ ..a a rww .nMaY .n h nr .w:.w ~ r ..,i.w+ e ~~ M h Ow.: in M w +4. y~w:w w rrM .~h. n ti r4 n :+4„ h ~wrw M, V.. r n :WM L wr~.r~, br .. .wa Yn wVy h Y, a •wrr wMM~ r w .14 w. pwniwn, r w r ,n.M:a wi.nn :. ., M: wr ,M. w wM.., w n wF:.a w +F+ aw ..w ~ •r~,ww, iw :M M .w:t wr4+ `n M -.~u... F n~4w h yfr+ r r qwr .p .w ~.Yy wYFr w Y Cr~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 17, 1990 T0: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director SUBJECT: STORAGE AREA ALIACAT_ION_.pR9CEDURfi AND YEE MATRIX ~ECOlDiENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission and staff recommend the following procedure and corresponding fees to be charged for atorage area built in city parks. BACRGRODND Through the City's Engineering Department, storage room annexes have been made to existing park restroom buildings. To best allocate and manltor these Pacilitiea, Community Services Department staPP has written the following policy and procedure for seasonal use of the atorage areas. It ie anticipated that the storage areas w111 ba available in early November. Respectfully submitted, Joe Schultz, C P Community se cee Director JS~kls AttdChIDent ~( EFFECTIVE: October 17, 1990 PURPOSE: To determine the process and procedure Por the allocation of storage areas built in city parks. POLICY: The purpose of building storage areas in city parks ie to assist city and resident nonprofit sports organizations in storage aP equipment during seasonal use. GENERAL POLICIE6 i GDIDELINSS: 1. Applicant will fill out a City Storage Request Form. 2. Storage permits are issued on a seasonal baels according to the "In Season" guideline sat in the Sports Field Allocation Policy. 3. Only sporting equipment and necessary support equipment will be stored. No perishable food or fl.mm.hlo mnrvin..fv aln eA mMn ehn .ru ....... ...... is not intended for snack bar use. 4. The City provides only the structure and existing equipment, ae presented in the original design of the building. It is the group's responsibility to provide any and all other equipment, i.e., storage racks. No permanent storage containers or shelves are allowed without prior written permiaeion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. The City assumes no liability for any equipment or storage units kept in the storage areas. 6. Kays - The City will cause to be made three master keys per permit. Ore key will ba given to the group to use and duplicate, at will, during the term of the permit. The other two keys will ba kept for emergency maintenance and inspection purposes only. Ona key wlil be kept nt the City's Corporate Yard and the other at the City's Sports Office. Storage Area Allocation Procedure October 17, 1990 Pages 2 7. Re-Keying - At the end of the permitted usage, the group will vacate the storage bullfling within fourteen (14) days Prom the end of the permit. On the Fifteenth (15) day the City will change the locks and make ready the storage area for the next user. 8. The storage area should ba kept neat with equipment properly stored for safety. Upon the conclusion of the permit, the user shall clear out all equipment and sweep out the area. No equipment can be left. 9. The City oP Rancho Cucamonga Sports Office or Park Maintenance needs to be made aware oP needed repairs to the building prior to the group making repairs. Groups may be billed Por repairs SP the repair is caused by misuse on the part of the user. PAIORITIBS i FESS: The r1*v rrn.nnil hao aA n_n1eA •hn Pnl l.....~..~ priority groupings and Pees Por issuing storage permits. GROUP 1 2 3 4 5 6 Re-Keying N/C 47.50 47.50 N/A N/A N/A Admin. N/C 10.00 10.00 N/A N/A N/A Maintenance N/C 17.50 17.50 N/A N/A N/A $75.00 $75.00 'G - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Ccuncil FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager SUBJECT: ADOPTIOB OH A 8880LOTI08 88TAHLI88I86 A C08T ANALY8I8 POLICY R80A8DIN6 PSIHLIC FACILITI88 City Council, at its last meeting, requested that a resolu- tion be prepared establishing a policy regarding cost analysis relating to public facilities. Attached is that resolution for consideration and adoption. Jack Lam, AICP ~--`_ _ city Manager JL/pr 90-291 RESOLUTION N0. 90-~~f A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOP.N IA, ESTRBLISHING A POLICY REQUIRING THE PREPARATION OF RN OPERATIONAL COST ANALYSIS PRIOR TO THE APPROVRL OF ANY NEW PUBLIC FACILITY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to review the fiscal and budgetary impacts of new public facilities prior to approval of new public facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to adopt the following operational cost analysis policy for the development of public facilities: "An operational analysis containing costs of operations and maintenance shall be prepared and considered prior to the approval of any new public facility to be built. Said operational analysis shall identify associated budgetary implications while at the same time contain an examination of ways to minimize costs of operations and maintenance white at the same time achieving the goals of the public facility Lo be built." 1~ CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 7, 1990 City Councii and City Manager Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Linda Beek, Junior Civii Engineer Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Traffic Signal and Street Improvements on Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, to be funded from Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8942 It is recommended that Ctty Council approve plans and specifications for the Traffic Signal and Street Improvements on Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and approve the attached resolution authoriz/ng Lhe City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids'. BACKGROUNDJANALYSIS The subJett protect plans and specifications have been completed by J. F. Davidson Associates, lncoroorated, rcvlewed by staff and approved by Lhe City Engineer The Engineer's estimate for construction is 5650,000.00. Legal advertising 1s scheduled for November 13 and November 20, 1990 with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 20, 1990. ReAASp''ectfully submitted, SB:LB:diw Attachment cc: purchasing d RESOLUTION N0. (V ~ ~/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS ANO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANO STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON ROCHESTER AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD", [N SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS W HE AEAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City cf Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and speclfT Catl ohs for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Traffic Si anal and Street Improvements on Rochester Aveanue and Foothill Boulevard . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk 1s hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shal] be substantially in Lhe following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 20th day of December, 1990, sealed bids or proposals for the "Traffic Signal and Street Improvements on Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately 1n the office of the City Clerk, 1500 C1vtc CenterDrive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must 6e made on a forth provided For the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Traffic Signal and Street ImprovcAaents on Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that to accordance with the provlsiors of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is rcquircd to pay not less then the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character 1n the locality in which the public work 1s performed, and not less than the general prevailing rau of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of *,he Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California 1s required to and has detemtlned such general prcva111ng rates of per diem 30 wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Orive, upper level, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the ,job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended 6y Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California Apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions 1n Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires Lhe Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works proiect and which administers the apprenticeship program to Lhat trade fora certifieate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to tournevmen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of aDD rentices to ,journeymen to such cases shall not be less than one to flue except: A. When unemployment 1n the area of coverage by the ,joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or 0. When the Contractor eravides ev49lflre that hr amniny5 registarod apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight ,journeymen. The Contractor 1s required to make contributions to funds estaDllshed for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or ,{ourneymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and 1f other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. 3~ Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements mr<y be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, ar from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (e) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in Lhe execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Otvision 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed to the execution of the contract, 6y him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic 1s required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours 1n violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined 1n the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit wltA h15 proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, pdyable to the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (101) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter Into the proposed contract 1f the same is awarded co him, ana rn event or ran ure to enter into sueh contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become Lhe property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the Ctty of Rancho Cucmmonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall 6e applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the law bid and Lhe second lowest b1 d, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1001) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (501) of the contract price for sa/d work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the wont contracted t0 be dono by the Contractor, or am work or labor @F gPy kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be rcqulred to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into beMeen him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for Lhe construction of said work. No proposal will 6e considered tram a Contractor wham a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 31 Contractor shell possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's license law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time this contract 15 awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the pions and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, wili be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of (15.00, Bald 515,00 is nonrefurMable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of (10.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required t0 enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Spettficetlons regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substlWte authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (perforwance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to rclect any and all bids. By order of the COUOCII Of Ln! L1 U' OT ItarniN w,.a,iv,iyd, wlifa'a'.c. Dated this ~ day of ,_, 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED 6y the Counal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, thfs day of _ 19 . or ATTEST: e ADVERTISE ON November 13, 1990 November 20, 1990 ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Councll PROM: Linda Darilels. Deputy City Manager ~,~1 ~-~~ BY: LeAnn Smothers, Redevelopment Analyst 9IJBJECI': Library Consultant Services RECOMMENDATION: Approval to execute a professional services agreement with Raymond M. Holt. Library Consultant, for an amount not to exceed $45,665. BACHGROUND: AS of the State Library Grant process, applicants aze required to provide a huildink program - a very specific study that defines and describes each of the library's functions and spaces, as well as fumtshings and equipment required to meet the unique needs of our community's demogray~hics. We have learned that the ma]ority of other applicants have retained specialized library consultants to create this portion of their application. Ta maintain our omp titiveness, it Is feat that we should also retain such expertise. Furthermore, the CStyty has budgeted funds to prepaze a library master plan. To be coat effective, staff believes that the two project (grant aDAhcation and macirr nlonl .~ .. ~~ ~„--~; ;;,~ -„i.:c ,uuCU u, one same data gathering and research te~common to both. the first part of Mr. Holt's contract would be spec[flc to the Central Park Library, and be paid for from the RDA's consultant budget. Because this portion of the report includes the backgrmmd research and data gathering, its proportionate share of the coot is greater. Thus the cost savings is realized on the development of the master plan by not having a second consultant repeatthla process. The second aspect of his contr~ict deals with developing a comprehen- sive master plan for the community's future library services. The master plan will identify the sL•:e and appropriate locations of libraaryry factlities based on the City's population and general plan. The pian will also include the formulatlon of local guidelines and standazds to use in establishing desired library service levels. From this information. the master plan report will include ;. flnan^_!al cost estimate of providing the desired library seMCe levels, should the Clty decide to transition to amunicipally-operated library system at a future date. This portion of the contract will be paid for with funds designated from the 1990/91 Budget. 3~ ANALYSIS: Mr. Holt has an excellent reputation with the State Librarian's Office, and it is felt that his research and findings will add we[ght to our grant application. He has completed over 100 slmilaz research protects in 15 states as a Ifbrary consultant. Also, by having him work on each of these protects concurrently, a cost and time savtngs can be realized by the City. Thfa item also appear on tonight's Redevelopment ~iYeneY oB~~- 1~ STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 V TO: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Joe Schulte, CLP, Community Services Director BY: ltaren McGuire-emery, Associate Paric rlanner SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL FUNDING TO BB ADDED TO THE CUCAMONGA BLEMENTARY SCHOOL FIELD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CO/90-095, WITH SDNRISH LANDSCAPE COMPANY, INC., (ACCT. X20-4532-9013) RECOMMENDATION: Approval of additional funding in the amount of $74,853.56, the Cucamonga Elementary School Field Improvement Project, COk90-095, to cover the cost of construction which exceeds the original 108 contingency. BACKGROUND: The Cucamonga Elementary School Field improvement Project is providing ball field renovations, basketball hard court facilities, play area amenities and related landscape and irrigation improvements as part of the joint use agreement between the Cucamonga School District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project, currently in the maintenance phase, is scheduled to be completed in mid _.,- Due to necessary field adjustments and additions to the contract resulting from inaccurate as-built drawings, as well as requests from the school district for design changes while under construction, an additional $74,853.56 is necessary to cover the total change order costa. This additional funding results in a total change order amount of $123,600.64 or approximately 25$ oP the original contract amount. A breakdown of these change orders is provided in Exhibit 1. Although change orders on this project have exceeded those normally encountered on other park projects, staff authorized the changes to enhance the Pinal product which will be used not only by the elementary school children, but also by the VOlltn Fp~YT9 g~nnpu Tait*.in t.io ~1 tY• Resp ctfully submitted, Jo Sc it2 ,4 p / Co unity Se es Director JS/kla 3~" ~ HXliIBIT I SiIlfl1ARY OF CHANGE ORDSR3 1. Survey, grading and additional Pield $21,229.00 preparation of the ball fields. 2. Removal of submerged and abandoned a;92'7.]0 basketball court surfacing. 3. Saw cut, demolition, removal and 6,268.65 export of material to provide acceptable drainage at the southwest ingress. 4. Demolition and export of concrete 794.43 sidewalk between building and Werth parking lot and building and south parking lot. 5. Import soil to meet new grades as set 20,156.62 by architect (addendum 7/12/90) - 2,850 cubic yards o£ material. 6. 1,600 square Peet of concrete path, 6,437.81 including grading, forming and fencing. 7. Addition of li.d9R am.a ra Poor nP t.v L.Y ov ~» c dust for ball field infields. 8. Addition of 340 linear feet of 6" concrete 2,214.43 mow strip and 2,113 square feet of 4" concrete walk. 9. Addition of 12 linear feet of 6" curb and 5,195.95 gutter, 76 square feet of 4" concrete pad with re!,nforcement for future storage bin, 1,455 square feet of 4" concrete walk and 123 linear feet of 12" wide concrete mow strip at softball dugout. 10. Addition o£ 1,100 linear feet of domestic 6,369.00 wat_r l±re. 11. Turf seed mix substitution for all land- 2,546.12 scape areas. 12. Addition o£ two dry wells for site 1,613.40 drainage 1 - 10'x3'x3', 1 - 20'%3'x3' 3s ~ Summary of Change orders Page 2 13. Electrical service from school to 1,280.12 irrigation controller. i4. Addition of two gate waives to isclate 32d.25 specific irrigation areas. 15. Addition of temporary Pencinq - 757 1,157.04 linear Peet of 6' Pence plus 3 gates. 16. Addition of fill material and grading 7,211.18 services to meet proposed field grades. 17. Addition of 426 square feet of "V" gutter 1,647.87 for parking lot drainage. 18. Addition of 882 linear Peet oP Concrete 4,986.15 curb around sand b0X and tot lot. 123,600.64 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFFREPORT :~ a DATE; November 7, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the Lity Council FHOii: Brdd Buiier, City Pid nner BY: Mi ki dra tt, Associate Pianner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND EXECUTE LETTER PMENDMENT N0, 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (CO 90-1081 FOR THE PR EPARATiON OF THE ETIWANOA NORTH SPECt FIC PLAN WITH C.M. ENGINEERING IN THE AMOUNT OF E5 ,593.10 WHICH WILL BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT N0, 01-4333-6028 (FY 89/90) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the subject contract amendment by minute action and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the same, BACKGROUND ANALYSIS: At ttie direction of the City Council staff requested that an lterna tive land Use Plan be Drepa red in addition to the existing General Plan alternative. Staff also requested preparation er a ~onstrainu map ana aaainonai research co expana secnon is, Sources of Financing. The screen check draft has been reviewed by staff and revisions have been made accordingly. This Do rtion of the work has been accepted as complete by staff. Conies of the proposed contract amendment are available in the office of Che City Clerk. 5ubmi uraa,nm i er Ciiy "r is nner BB;MB/jfs 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 1, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRON: Brad Buiier, City Pia nner BY: Miki Bra tt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AWARD AND EXECUTE LETTER AM'NOMENT N0. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AG P.EEMENT (CO 90-10E) FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN WITH C.M. ENGINEERING IN THE AMOUNT OF E12 ,900 NHICH WILL BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT N0. 01-4333-6028 (FY 89/90) RECOMMENDATION: [t is recommended that the City Council approve the subject contract amendment by minute action and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the same. R ACKGROU ND/ANALYSIS; qt the direction of the City Council staff requested that the Alternative Land Use Plan become the preferred alternative for the Etiwa nda North Specific Plan and that a draft be prepared for circulation in an expeditious manner. Following preparation of a scope of services and budget by the consultant for prepz ra Lion of a circulation draft, staff has directed that a screen check circulation draft be prepared. Completion of the screen check circulation draft is scheduled for the week of November 5, 1990. Copies of the proposed contract amendment are available in the office of the City Clerk. Res f y sub ' / ~ _ , G Bra er City Planner BR:MB/jfs 37 GCl'Y VF 1{ANUriV UIJI;AMVNI:A i,u~?9'; STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner ~I SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO E%ECUTE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER N0. I (CO 90- '~ 028) 'd ITN J. F, OAVI DSON ASSOCIATES, INC., TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES TO PREPARE PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATES FOR THE TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. THE CHANGE ORDER IS FOR THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF 54,490.00 TO BRING THE CONTRACT TOTAL TO 517,470.00 TO BE PAID FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT N0, 01-4333-6028-3853. RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the above subject Contract Change Order No. 1 with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. 6 ACKGROUN0IANAL YSiS: The firm of J.F. Davidson, Inc. is engaged in preparing preliminary construction estimates and related mapping for the Trails Implementation Plan. Through the review of the Draft Trails lmnla n4aHn Dla anAi Fi.aH n.e •n •An nA •..:a .~: -~- ,...... becomeoneces sa ry. nThis requires add itiona l'eng ineering services by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. to revise the preliminary construction cost estimates. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the contract to include the completion of this portion of the Trails Implementation Plan. This Change Order is far a total of 54,490.00 which will bring the contract total to 517,470.00 to be paid from Contract Services Account No. O1-4333-6028-3453. Respec ~lly\ submitted, Brad BUl ler v City Planner BB:DC/jfs 3 ~' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 TO: City Council FROM: Debra Adams, City Clerk/Records Manager BY: Tony Russell, Records Clerk ~~ SUBSECT: DESTRDCTION OB CITY DOCIINSNTB It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached Yorm. Under the authority of Government Code Section 34096, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destrvction is first approved by the city attorney and city eauncil. Also under the same Government Code Section, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA/tr attachment ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 90 ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RRNCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS ANTI DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NG LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records under the charge of the fciiowi ng City Ue pa rtments are no Iqn ger required for public or private purposes; ADM iNISTRRTIVE SERVICES & PERSONNEL WHEREAS, it has been determineu that destruction of the above- mentioned materials is necessary to conserve storage space, and reduce staff time, expense, and confusi an in handling, and informing the public; and WHEREAS, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California authorizes the head of a City department to destroy any City reco rd5 and doc unie nts which are over two years old under his or her charge, without making a .:o py thereof, after the same are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by resolution and the written consent of the City Attorney; and WHEREAS, it is therefore desirable to destroy said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, in storage, without making a copy thereof, which are over two vears old: and WHEREAS, said records have been approved for destruction 6y the City Attorney. NOW, THER-FORE, this City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1; That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those recoris descrit~ed as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2: That the City Clerk is authorized to allow examinatf on by and donation to the De parUne nt of Special Collections of the University Research Library, University of California, or other historical society detiana tad by the fi4y fn qnr il, any of thg noronds described if! Ex hi hlt "A" attacned hereto and made a part hereof, except those deemed to be confidential. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and t enceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. ~~ Resolution Na. 90-*** EXHIaiT "A" Pd ge 3 .. ,.` 9A4L'A JCAXONGA 7estruccim! No:!'icaNan Reoc~: 'AGE. ;A'?: 79/^.0/9.^ ©riginal Po •,w E: 17::7:6=. or Qualit .+ -e:c-s a•e scheeu!e? fcr Cez:rvr.'e^. e',ease '^!;ace Y ;es^s:: a: ~s.; .c., s acc ^e;u•^ .; REC7RC5 YANdGEw°4' .:ca7"wEy*, + _ -^e -ea•cs ''s:eC helob may al' oe Castroye;. , -e:a~^ :°se -a ^. ec ..:• ar f e;^ -='C^s, :es:-cy -eS.. _.-- -. .-_RES :':;87:1'4-:= ~Aw,r CE9RA :?~- ... :E" VANE ACw:Y SE,RV:CES/dCM:N wA:: $CRT: - _____________________--_--..~'.5--___________-_. we A' d E9EV' ?^,% ;C4TE4'6 'RJa '^ c^.4:.:5:^,A. C;9R`. Ga;V: `.V^.E ` ...'i 9: '2/29/95 " a ..~ '2-:?-C7 a`ce' ~ ---?RS, wceCS, ANC s 4F- 7E:CR'S ';'/Bd '1/19/06 . ;'-RC4C_.::4L CCRRESRC4CEA':£ - 76/9'.., '2/29/09 MEL^ c. 3. 'c.-C'.-73 ?- x «AG -5A?£ AG9ccwE4T ,5/0'/77 '2129I9S -;';e- ~ 1 5? 3CC ;:P7./a '2/29/9'. -:':e^ x - :cpog5:': CN '3 :6/:'/77 '1/29/96 -;~cx- = - Gab -A% '9?S-9S ".Si C'/'i '1K9/BE :'.e^ f ;AS '4% '901;95 "'/%'/"7 ':/25/96 :':e^ I 9A6 '4% '903/BC iS/71/T '1/29/86 ;';e- x 3d5 -A% '90"°.2 1E/^'i" '2/29/85 °a'xe- x ? SAS '4% '900/9' G6/Ct/~i '2/i9/BE -:''.e- a 9 545 -A% '90:193 :S/0'/~1 '1/29/86 c'. Ce• c ,AS 'A% '9~9/?: 05/0'/7+ '1/29/95 -o'.e' '64G "dk '9"i/19 ;'6j 0`./77 '2/25/A6 :'~e- x SAS 'dx '9"i'0 CS/^.!/'9 '2/29/96 :'cer x - A'E ;^v-RC:.ER6 7E a7 A' 3'-92 7S/^.'/+~ '1/29/86 ..e' d i-1-5 1CN'40GE46 REPoR? "9-9^ C6/7'./fl '1/19/04 - -- - - 6'A? ;CN'90-''-£RS C9-'9 7S/°'/i' '2/29/96 c ce' a '- 5'4'0 CCN'RCL'.E~4$ REaCR'S 85-96 "3/7'./^1 '2129/06 - - - S4-E 7CNR\'RCLLERS REROR?6 81-BS C6/".'; ~' '1;29/06 :'';e^ a '9 5'A•E CCN?RCLLERS PER^.R*5 03-01 56/7'/77 ~i2/19/86 -- .. - .. ; . - :°Y" 2C _576 AEaCR'6 92-03 CS/7'/ii '1/29/06 ^'e:wc dGA: NS' 'HE C^Y O'/26/e9 :9/19/06 i1 .'-7i-73 - ;e• x AESCMLINANN, 6iEYE 9-25-79 ^.7/25/9 09/'9/96 : Cer A 1 ANiLOCEA, 5`ANLEY !2-37-9' ^.'/251'9 :9/'9!05 :'ae• 4 3 AVAXIAN, JCSERH 6 JAMES 'C-9^ T/F5/~9 09/'9/85 a'Ce^ a 1 9LIXOEIL, GALgIB, CEVGR i-92 0'/25/79 :9/19/06 ..e- a S BCUCH, OAN I£L '. 9-26-e' 77/25/Y9 09/19/06 'o':e- i '6 9RACY, CARL v. 1-11-83 7;/15/79 09/19/86 ~AS"c. Aw'~ 6-3-06 +n~no no nO mx ;';er r ; Av?:, 4USAN MAY55, w. 9-'3-9C 77/25/19 :9/'9/06 C''.:e- a 9 :'R; 5'^, GARS '0-15-9" 77/25/19 C9; '9/86 7a:e~ CEaAR'NEY? MEAT ^.ace: ASS'. CI_'_Y_AY+~pRXE`' x°C4 E: Ex'~ 225 cE4!ANEY' 2?CLAD C'k. .E-RCu 7E'A; SVA'. i:% 9C% VC. .CA?; CA Sax CB-'390 :A'E SE" 'C. -'599 e '1-'999 i :9-'908 I Resolution No. 90-*** Page 4 G:*Y 7F PANCeD DucAMaNGA Oesirurion Nat!ftmtim ReRar- °4GE: 2 ;4'S~ '99 438/90 '^e `:''''.cr^g records are schedu'ed 'or Ees;r:_:~c^. a'~ease '-e ca;e :er-ec rsccs •t•o^„ s'gn and ret~drn to RECGR95 vANASEvEh- 7,04 vE4' + _ '-a -er-:; 'i s;ed :e'~cw may a`? ce .estraye:. t 9e)a'^ "cez -.a ^sac r't^ ar C °:r __ --_____ ^cntbs, desvoy °es-,. ~~-- 4E:C4a :CCRC iR4`CR: vAMr CE99b %=" ~ '~`.'. :c:' VAME: ACNL4 9E4V?CE5/AC1A;N vpei CA'ES X', EVEV- 9",A CCx'E4'9 =ACM ©riginai Poor Quality v4:- SCR': oNCNE: cv,. >E4MANE4i PECCRO C?A. :S'ROv 9E-P: EVAL 9C% 9CX YC. :CCA':ON 9cx "-8-'99^. CA'E 9cN' ',^,, -- = ' ;c':' JE59E cRA'.E° 6 S~ARCN 9-22-75 ;+/2S '+i 09/'9/85 ; ce- : " ;AV~S..^°CE 3-2-9=. '7/25/79 79/!9/86 ce- : ,arES CE4S74 E-9.9! C7/2S/79 79/!9/85 = :e^ ~ ' :du-c 5 eVAIS CON[~POL '-4-9d 77/25/79 79/'9/86 :e- : c ' '- ' =A:CON..OSEa' _ '-5-97 07/25/79 09/'9/85 : : e+ : ; °A;; YE--A 9-'3-53 :7/25/79 ,9('4/86 o ye- : - ' •c cARME7, R: CNv 2-S-A2 07/25/79 CS/'9/85 : .e- 3 ~ :E'-:, A'.::E SM^~, MARL'Y B-E-At :7/25/79 79/19/8fi .z- ¢ = ' '°. °C•-, VA'. 9-'9-9fi 77/25/'9 05/!9/95 c :e^ : - '9 ;, 1.6. EN'EPDA;SES 10-13.91 ;1/25/79 79/'9/96 :'-_ ' ': 5:--. OEVk:S '^.-9-92 77/25/19 79/'9/85 ee+ a ~~ 2' GL:VER, fEL LY 3-'S-9C 71/25/79 09/19/86 __+de- : .' OR^,4 Ex '840..8, JAMce 0_a-oC 07/ZE/79 09/'9/96 ?'7 e^ : ' 23 G. GARv 3-IS-80 77/25/79 ^79,"9/86 -a :e^ : - ' 2C G,; `: R.9EZ 6 7ARL:NG EQB-e6 07/25/19 091 '9/Bfi oe" : = '< 'Ef'°CCCY, ACONEv 9-29-?C ^+nc nR no; .a we -o de- t :_. _C':7, GERALC 'C-28-A' ;7/45/74 ^-9/19/86 '.e^ a - :7 °...., vARV34N0, BR: AN '0-'5-93 ^7/25/79 09/'9/95 . - .- - ~ + ' ^ :3A~ 4Cy CC ~-8-vp 01/25!79 ", 9/'9/8E _ .A; rg bGA: vS- '°E :" C7/C'/90 0'./29/97 it 01-73-02 , _e- : ' RA^J==, PO° 6 OANN!E `2-A2 'vRJ 2-83 73/0'/90 0E/29/A7 -o :e- e + Fav;v6Z, CczoA, ^.AN Ic,! S RU" S-'5-93 C7/9'~i S6 95/29/81 : ae- = ' i iA4CNEZ, rANOAL ~ ,!-81 03/:'/80 ^,5/29/9' =R :e- t 1 Sae':9ANEZ. VA LOO 7-30-90 73/0'/80 05/29/97 °- = ' i EC:JA9A, Y:9CEN* 5-10-A7 ^3/..e'./A^. 05/29/87 - der 0 5 5COVEL, HELOA 77-2B-B1 ;3/7'/90 :5/29/97 -°' : ' c SNORER?, AMONOA 3-5-88 73/CI/BC 06/29,`°' .e- R = - 9 SMUGARi, JEFFREY 2-9-19 73/^.!/BO OS/29i B7 - z- 9 ' 9 54 CAL. EOISON 8-9-91 :3/:'/80 04/29/9' c de^ t ` '0 - 50. CAL EDISON 7-'8-A/ ;7i 9'180 GS/29/91 b ce^ t ' S'EPHENS. RANCY R. 1-2e-9' 5.25/97 ::'xr A ' 'i --'JVA~, LENORA 9-35-9! ^3/"'/90 05/49/87 co '. der t ' '7 ' '~CVO90N, NEAiM °7NARD '-'8.95 ' C3/C'/BC 05/29/87 :art : a -CMP50N, NICNAEL '7- + ^.3/C'/BC )5/29/97 ~ ate: CEPAR7MENi XEA Cate: A5S1 C; 7Y ATT FY ^~ '. ^,8-'989 ~a Resolution No. 90-*** Pa ye 5 °^Y CF RANCNO CL'CANONGA 7eatrucNOn MoNti cat9an Reoor: >4GE: 3 iA'.°: 78/78/97 •;xE'. •G:dd:E97 riginal Poor Quali+ "e '. . ^ecc~as a^e schee;l ec h^ destr::C C•. `'ease 1.^•ca:e .y :es'•ee : ;ocs •tr cr. s'yn and ret:-r. ': DECOR 75 xANAGFxEV' CE e4 R'xE9'. r -'e -ec: s ~•s:ec ce'~, ox maY al'. :¢ :es:rcYe:. ~'" Pe•a-- ^cse -,-vec r`:r ar C `:r -c-:^s, iesvoy •es:. .. ... - '.;4L :: r. R^. i4A*CA. °1'%x :`?4A :P' .. ;E>r VANE: 4CM!N SERV!Cc.S/A 9x:4 xA C. 50R?: xA iY ;A-ES .... ?OC ~7N'EN'S °40x - ':e^ : 'E vAJa 4. ROA', A-::`, S 7~4:5':4E 2_71-92 ':e- : neS+3~'4Y vG4!C'.".*CPA'- SERV!:E '2-:-9e -c'ce• a ZES4A, ^^-RCSS, 'A~u'3P5' :ASE ?-25-3^. ;.A;xS dGA:4S- ' - .. :!/25/'S 79/4'/9' -. a' : .CYE5. ^PA.P',ES f-2c.-'9 c'ce^ v 3 S:CC%, ER!C .'. '.-'9-82 :':¢~ v d :C9FNSOAM£R, XARL S 700' P-S-T9 c':e^ v -:435'QEE'..aAES "-27-BS -- ~~ t S LOaEZ, GA OR?E'. '-37-81 -c':e^ a x14 *: VE2, A4'bCH° 9-25-92 -p `;e• a a rr ou E95CN, iv E4Rr AN4 5-~-9d - .: e• s xcxEO, °A"4:C:A '.-3C-9a :e• a !CY'Aw, ECPOE d SALL 7-28-A' :':e- 1 '~ rOr•A?' Sw:C°C:, E4GiVFE9 '2-92 '°PL' 2-93 -. ._.. i~~ruro :''.e• v '3 OL: vA, (EE:° 2-22-92 ..- ;P?3A, dr: v'A c5-2A-9S ;'<e' i ,e•q xARCE'.. ;2-'S-33 et-RE°. SARAr 5-3'-e9 :':e^ A '9 >.xE-;.:cccg5v B_21-gr .~:e- = s4;'CMARC. x:LL IAN .LA!N$ AGA!MSi iNE CI iY "/7'/9' 77/19,~A8 e- v PAC: TEAL 12-3!-Bl c'ce• 4 2 PAOL EOMARD 1EAL 1•IS-9A d':e~ v 3 N!CNAEL 'NOXPSON 2-5-8c. cc~:er A 4 TIMOiNY TNORNBURY 11-2'-8' °c'.re• A i JOE :OAREZ S-A1 - .^ a y .S •cx LA nnuuA +xYCN .. . ce• v E4IC MA_4EA '2-3-BS .•.- v 3 1448 x ,'ERS '-2" 96 nn4 c., E%*: 225 :c4ePNEA- Rc.OC97 C?P. :ES-RCY 7E'4!EVAL EC% EON 4O. C°,A*:ON °... ..-'990 .^q" 3c V' C3i :'/gn l ,n•,p7 .~;e. ~oO ;3/7'i9C ;4/2'./79 7d/25/e9 Ce!2S/e3 :d /:5i"i 7e/25/T9 7d/25/r9 C//25/49 7d/25/'9 3d/ZS/'9 74/2 S/79 ;4/2`./79 ;1/2',/'9 :9/25/'3 :4/25/'9 2d/2x-/~9 7d/23/'9 7d; 15/79 :2/25/79 :d /2'./79 7!/2S/'9 55 /C~/x~ ~. ,9. .~/:!/9' "/C!/A' "/7'/9' u'; E'' .,/7,,y. :'/9' 3S/a, 75/29)°' :S /29/9' '3`./29/9? T-^,3-7? :9/2'/9? CB/2!/A' 79/Y 191 70/3'/0. 7A/2'/Ai 7A/2'/9~ 78/2'/81 7P12'/P' :8/2'/8'/ :8/2118' 78/Y /8' "x/2'/9' :9i 2'ix' Oe/2'./81 "A /2'/A~ ^9./2'/9' 79/2•/9' 78/21/81 3B/2'/A' 71-73-73 77/29/99 :?;23/99 G/29/BB 73,~29/AA 23/29,'ex C5/is/99 7/25/99 ".3/29/89 .a:e: AA?NE9? MEAD :ace. ASSL O:'Y 4*`. 4Ev 79-•989 5 73-'990 ~3 Resolution No. 90-*•• Page 6 ..'° 7F AANCNC COCAaICNGA lest ruc^.Om NCt'. E1Cdt i0r AepOf: *:we--: ' ::5:35: _ : w -2:^., :5 a'a SC;'!Cl', eC ~.r CeSt ^J:S'J-. "=a'a2 _':L1e -es 'ec rsws^cr, ,'gr, era -em •, :c RECOA75 w44AGEYEN` CP49-wE4' K _ -tee -.-_.-a 1's: e::e'ow may all Ge aee!roye:. ' >e :: '-' ._¢ a-.e: x .- ar v =- -<-t^s.:esr:y -¢r. A•E: :cJ-^44ME'. 4^M:Y SEAY:CE57ACN;4 +dl_ ECR''. '+A'ri :AT E9 ( EYE`.- 3C% CC4'E4'S °ACM -. -. ~• tl iE_+ 6 -: MC'!'v NECdOALE '-'E-BC -o c_ - -,~+E4 5 ;E309e, dEL'S .-k-0.3 ;¢- 1 'd "uAE3 NEED ?-9-0/ 'd :e- t 'E AVYA wei'x 8-'-91 _;'.¢. tl ~c '..;YpS ;ChN5CN; XES' AXE RI CAN :YS. :-'9-0 -:'^e- 2 '3 GE4F/A x:-_:.4M5 5-8-30 c'ce^ x 'c E-A:4E NiV~YEIo'ECH 8-'S-e' 9':e- R 2: wAAC:A NONLM!E?CA 11-10-B9 .':¢- tl - .E?A'E : LdAR°JYONA NR IGH' 9-5-BS - --- c 37 +AFCU 2c-: C;ER '2-8-93 _ - e'_d:YS aCA;VS' -?E C' './0'/?9 ;3/29i 98 -.~:ar tl 4E-4A--. E S :45UAL-° °-3-91 - _ i pG.:.pR~c dL9ER' S NAA° ?E'-EN v-R-B7 -v':e- P A-SV, W;V 4E -Ep4 a-2'-31 -¢- s A-; 'A'E :NSCAANCE CC. '-'3-BA :~:er tl '. Y-;5'A'E !45OPXALE SUBRCGAi'.ON '-'B-97 -- : A_iAREi, :CNN:°- a-2x92 :'cer ¢ ? ANPAAO, ANGE'-INA 1-3-8! °:'ce^ 4 9 ARCMOc.E. 'iCOM '1-2/-02 ':':er D '.7 AACOR:, ',E09 V, 1-11-86 ':~:e^ a !! AA?;SiIC LANOSCFPE, IXC. "-'d-95 :':e~ A ''3 9AOER, ROBERT b OOAiNN -E-5' .e^ tl '7 BAKER, XE'.?A '!-3!-39 -:':e^ tl 'd 3AXER, JOHN B-'.-A/ -c':e- a '. 9EEBON INOUS?Ri ES t0-'C-03 -':¢• ¢ 9S!YC", '-EONARC E'.'GENE~ -'1-03 ':~:er / '9 9'.;CMO':5', OARREA 5-95 '//3/x/7. ~C{~- _C~~l- i /2t;/9o j /~k4~ - - :'.EAR`!AEN? +EAO Tau: 1~ Original Poor Quality J°CY'E: E%' 320 o c-yMAYEV' YE_JNU C: A. ... iE'i: E:;.L EC% 9C% V^. .CCA`!7N Box :9-199: ;A'E SEV' -: v9' :7/29; B8 '7'I?' 03/29/80 "/7'/B' :3/19/00 "/^1/9' ^-3/29/00 "/7'/9' 0'3/39/88 9'/9' 03/3:/OB 2 " '0'18' 73/29/00 '0'/9' :3/29/0° ~'/;'/A' ]3/29/00 •./='i°' :3/29/9: 17'/8! 73/29/90 "./0:/B` 03/29/BB ^'/9' :3/39:90 "./::/0' :7/29/80 -:'?-C3 E '.7-'397 ':/:'/"5 C3/39/eA '^j'. •; '3 :'./19/80 .'C'/r9 :3/29/°.9 /C'/~9 "7/29/38 •i 7'/f9 C3 /29/88 '7/0'/!9 ^.3/29/58 ^/^. /''A 73!29195 '7/9'/79 03/29/88 ';/C'./,9 03/29/98 '0/9'/'9 ".3/E9/8A '"i ^'/'9 93/39/80 ';/7';'9 73/29/00 ~;rg~/19 :3/39/08 '0/0'/79 73/19/08 '^/9'!+9 ".3/39/98 ': C'/'9 :3/29/98 ';/^.'/'9 13/[9/00 '".r 7'/?9 73/39/80 Aye-*...,' a?T-RNEy Resolution No. 90-*** Page 7 C:"! CF RANCHO CUCANONGA ~(~~Itlai ('001' Oes:ruc;ian Noti tication ReAar: QLlp Illy !INE: '7:10:"" ',e `a b.°g recaras are scheau'ec for Ces;n.:Nr >'easa '-C:a]e :es'-eo =~s:os •,; •,on, ;'gr arc ^e:.•n ;a RECOAC5 MANAGEVEH* 7EPAR'ME4?. o•- Y__ -re ^--.; s "s:ec 5e'.on ne; a :e ses:^eye:. t :e:z'^ ;rose na rseC r';^, an % `or ncr;'s, :zsb:y ^es :. .. ... .. :.. -.:7C4Ci 44'^4~ .ANN CE BRA E s- .. :E o- VAM E: 47M;V ?E4V!7E5/ACN 6Y +ARt 7A'E5 ,' ?._.- ?:%:W-E4-> FROM .. :': e- = '9 BO!'AYYC4 vA4v b :L... '4CMA5 0.37-4' -:':er 5 ;, EC!SVER!, >AMELA d-091 - 'c e^ ; 90NE!_C .05E vu '-2-83 :'. e^ 1 ?CNBEP, .CMV '2-3-32 :''. cer S 23 3E4^,A., CARO'. ANN 2-27-93 co':er a 2a B4EVNE:S, TAMES 9. 2-':-08 c'Ce- : .. 9RCACECr.', REBEL7A ''-0:'!SE ".-AC :~ce^ 1 20 5R7CNMAN, 5'EVEN CAL°. '0-3_v0 °c'oe^ 4 21 BRONCA'E-;0. VLNCEN' 9-'1-Bd °e leer 4 28 BRCNN, CHc-R!E 8-5-9' c :e' 23 ?AOMN, NAVYE 2-E-9' -V ~ce^ A 37 0JCNMAN, 00RI5 9-'B-91 c o'ee• : ?' 3RvA4', 'OCMAS 0-29-92 -:':er i 32 ?ICY;E'!, M;CHAEE 4-5-50 d~:e• : :3 3C 4O: C', A:CNAR7 '2-?'-8+ o''Cer i 34 7A AeEY'ER, ;ACN '!-29.91 c'Ce^ v 35 :°AfcEY -OINT 'JN!ON HVS. v-'9-83 -::er : 3B '.~..7-aANx:A, RHCNCA 8-2i-85 -c'ce^ a 39 ...CUGF ;'Y 9-3C-93 _~.z. A 4n -7cc:v~ fENNE`H B-S-?4 `ce^ v e' :OVEN, e''-V;V ~A-B2 -o'ce^ i :. :749:4, S°?4EN '2-21-93 cd, ce^ v a3 COUGH, GARR!CN 3-23-BE c':er A dl CRAG, EUGENE 5-21-80 =c':er A IS CAOFT, EOXARO fi-B-82 °c':er A !6 CR09BY, ROBL4 9-5-91 °e'ce^ v 47 CUNNINGS, SCOTT 3-/-B6 °o'Ce^ A IB C.P. CONSTRUCTION 6-19-83 c'Ce^ v A9 OE NIEA1, fRANN 10-29-85 .. :o- a i.. ":dnf c:~ ~:dvii, 1-•~-Ai e':e- t S C, :. cRANC!SCC 10-3'-81 -:';e- S '.2 "vEVSCN, CIAV'0N "-25-95 MA i- 5CR'~ >~^4F °N': :25 1ERMANEN? RECCR7 C'P. CES'40Y RE'R!EV4 BC% 90N NO. CCCA':ON' 9cx CA-1990 CA!E BEY' ?C '7/^.'/+9 73/29,'88 __ "/7'r'9 C3/?9/eB 'C/;'/+3 ^3/29/99 .'".'/79 03/29/88 '7/0:/19 03/29/00 ':/7'/19 03/29/88 !C/C!/19 03/29/88 '7/7'/19 73/29/99 , 'C/0'/19 73/19/88 :/C'/19 93/19/89 '7/7'/19 73/29/98 '"/7'/19 03/29/88 '7/C V19 73/29/88 7/G'/19 :3/29/88 '0/C'/19 C3/29/9A '7/0!/79 73/29/88 :'i ~+ 7Ci :+i GG 'C/C!/19 73/29/88 !Oi 0'/19 C3/29/BB '7/;'/19 03/29/88 '7/0'/19 93/29/88 '^./^.'/i°. 73/29/88 , '^./01/iS 03/29/88 '7/0'/79 73/29/88 ':/7'/19 :3/29/AA '7/0'/19 73/29/88 '7/7':'9 73/29/88 '0/0'/+9 73/29/98 '0/7'/'9 C3/29/99 "i7'/+9 73/:9/88 'C/7'/+9 C3/29/BA +a .?ra,an ';/;1/19 03/29/BE '7/:!/19 03/29/88 CERAR'MEN1 VEAO late: 855*. C"v Ai+O ~5 Resolution No. 90-*** Page 8 CI?° OF PANLNC CUCA9M7NRA Dentructian Natit+catSon Rwpor: `"e `o "'. crry records are scheduled `or destruCm^. c''ease !., 'ca :e :es'•ec d's cesRbn, s'.gn end rotor^~ tc RECCR06 MANAGEMEN' DERARI`E4i. %_ '^e 's.c^d5 listed col mr nay el' de destrcyed. % - 7e;a^•; -cse •a^.ec .~:• a- ~ `:' .______ Tcr•^s. cesP=Y 'es:. ?: ' _ a's.: 7ECCRDE COC4C!NA'CR: 9A'aR 7E9R4 ]c.4+ - A'S7 ;Ea? 9AME: 4Dw;4 EE9V!CES/ACM!9 wA!'_ SCR re 79 DA?E5 %~~ E4E4' °_C% Cy cyc cg7w ''de^ d 53 ;"/:`.. °4ANM 2-7'-+9 a`^.e^ a 5e ;:CS!yG, :E?4A - '-99 'ce• a E5 ,.CCwS °Pc.DE7; C5/<ypeceeR 'RVCN!NG 2-'5-93 -d de^ a c5 J'uCEt. •: ;NAEL 1_'._62 Original Poor Q~aiity 4N~=: E%'~, 776 ~c_R,rANENi PECCRD C'R. DEE?ROY RE'P!EVA; 90% 9C% NC. LCG'; 7Y 9cx :?-'990 CA?E is :'' 'C. ,. ~~/+a ^.3/29/98 '^/91/19 73/29/98 '7/01/'9 03/29/88 '7/0'/79 73/29/98 fiNE 7; cc'E 7Ec4R'rEN+ RE^CA'G :'./,'/91 '2/29/95 'r °E!'3 ^ '99 '3-72-0' S '2-'997 °='de^ c S°Ei:°° 4E°!:R'E CNE ".'/.!/At '2/29/95 _ y ' N 9~ -~-- ---------- -------- - ; q/~~ ----------- - - /~/ 7EcA?'rEN' 4EA^. Dare: A55'. ;,t° A,+D cv EC%ES 'C RE CE9'PCwW 9 y~ ' Resolution No. 90-*** r °q„ exriiE+i Page 9 CeSVUCtic^ kc;'.'+cavior ReOOr: 'A GE. ;A 'E: :3;^.9/93 " . 0(72 _ •: ar~^; ^on^^s are sc..^.eeu'ed 'or sesv-::;•?-. :ease :•t.:e^, t, U~ :=s'-e:: s?s ^:-. s'g^. ar^. -e a. ;a 4ECOA".B rA4AEEwEv- :E%44-rEY', ' GO r Qu l ' - _ -.._-_, s:e: ae'cr nay a^ ae fes:raye: , a !fy ._ ?e-.: :... 2-. ec .." fr f '. --•_-.- v'f, :es: roy 'eY. -. __ ,.... oi'::P7E :::4::Ya':9: !L°4 rA4° .. .'If ._" VAMC. x9G04V° rA:_ EC 4': ar04E' E'%': +ARx ;A-:: ac4xANE.Y* ic.CO40 C'R. CEE^4CY 2E'P; EY4: ?C% %` E4EV' 9C% :7!-E`.'7 °PCr , 9O% N^. ~CA':OH Sex 99-'99; CA'E 5,4' .C9 fca.: ~-:.'4S .:9. ':i 29 /9e 'pv ~?-n•_7y t '2_'oae : :e^ ? :'. EAr -.a!S" vDa. :C. ~^ ,3-°.? "-'; 9: 'a 25/91 , ,_.' f ..L°ar -°~:S :4A. :Y'_? ':-.. C'/C'!92 '2/29/91 _ :':A-c' wE:i.AL EVPC'. wvy. c0 n'/; y93 '7i?9/95 . '-.3-:: ' '2-'9A7 'ca- e CO4PESOeON:E4CE ;•/, ;°.' '2/29'91 -o'ce^ i 2 4LEwAN CAV:O :7'/A3 '?/29/95 :~.Ye. ? ~ pL•~ruc-?'. 9NE4L° a. :'/^I/A3 '2/24/85 -: ~ee^ v ! 9E4;A5, .'CNN C. :'/:'; 93 '2/29/95 o `:e- f ':A9R:N~A, 9ON9:E _. :!/C VA7 '2/29/9'. -.:e^ z c. , ;AV:S ?. ' "'/83 89/95 4V 2;C?ARO i - CO C1/C'/83 '2/29/BS -'^e- v 9 ;AML, 4; C4A49 :'/S'/A3 '4/?9/95 cc'ne^ 9 gAS;?'.5, _.N CF C1/-0'/83 12/49/BS :'ee^ R Ew4E°. 'ARRv :. P/C'/B3 '2/29/AS - .,e^ a .. c4A4S, x°V'!' . :!/C!/83 !2/29/95 ~ °c `ce- R G.'9FOeG, GA R° 5. C'/9 V93 '1/29/ac :':e^ a 'f 3CME?, P; CMARC J. C'/Y/83 '2/29/9' ';e' v OCV24SS, ..C°N :. C'/C'/93 '2(29/.0° ^'ce• ? ~Ci csv Ova :. C1 /C'. /93 '2/29/AS =a':e~ R ' ;ew- .E44v R. C'/^'/83 '2/49/95 .._- f .o ~pwE:..,. :'9:V04 E. 9'/C'/93 '2/29/85 -:':e^ f „ - ', N; __: A!! .. C'/C'!83 '2/29/9 c. 'c~ce' f :. MuvS9EP0ER, ANN , !^'/93 '2/29/95 a'?a- R P SA!ANv, NANGOI;R C'/C'/87 '2/29/°.c -s':er t 22 NI241AR, NA'NAR;NE E, :'/:'/B3 12,/29/85 -?':e' 4 23 NRALL, BARBARA J. :'/C'./83 !2/29 /9 c, :':e' R 2f NAUSE, JOAN A. 9'/:'/93 '2/29/9'. °olce^ R 2S LAM, JACK ;'/:'; 93 '2/29/95 c':er / ?6 LEACH, :SNOB N. ^,'/C'./93 '2129/85 ..- ..:ip-c R. i9ACv '2i 291 Ai :'ce^ f 29 '-ECvARO, OAV:C A. 9'IC'/93 '2/29/95 c °:'fe^ R ?a cn __..4A~P', SHARON /.'. /9? 9/95 2/2 ~ - --.._ - 9 ~ ~/?6/p~l~` ~~f ' -_ .a.e. 3EaAR?wey. yEAC C/;c ASS'. CS` Y A". YEv y~ Resolution No, 90-**" Page 10 :!!'! OF RANCHO CUCAMONBA Cestrucror. NaNYicaHOn Repor: n ec; g9:28:5C"- ']e 'o'lce'ag records are sc"eEd.ed far deatr•~ :br. 4'ease 'rci:ate :e5 `^ec c's:cs it icr, siCn end retain a RECOACS eAN AGEMEYT CE°ARTVEY'. N '-e -ess lis:ec Sel a~ naY a". ce desc^oye:. % _ 4e ::•, •^CSe `a"v!t vi:^, an % f9r .__.^-- _^:^.a. cee:'cy ^ee;. ~~~~(na/ poor pualit .Y ^.. 2"- .. :'?~ R°C,~P:S tCQP7:4A :4: VJaM MAP" - ._T. :E>' Vpc. ac4SCA4EL •A I'. tiR'., owCVE: °.%q 2'C "A 49 ;A'ES >c4YAN EMT ECCAC C!4. :ESTRC°. 9E:R!EVAE °OA S%; EVE9T °.:% CON!Eh S °W1P .. 95% 9:. .CCA?!ON Sox :.-'33" ^,A'E SEY' *C - .. ;N7, V:CAAE- : :'.(:'/83 '2/29/8E :':z- i ? +:C,'.!RE, YAREN ^.'/:'/a.7 'C/29.'85 -o':e^ i YAR:•:. 4iC•44^ ., ;'/97 1 '2/29/9c. Yce^ a 7i aAR':x, :CYN '- C /C'i93 (2/29/9$ o .e• II 3! 4`!OCV, SANCRA :. 71Ja"';°.3 '2/29/ze :`de^ i !! gYE!5, :ON :. 71/;1/83 12/29/9E o'ce^ a 3i VEE:. '°CNAS 'C'/93 '2/29/8'. :'cer II °!SC!:'AER!. 'CN: L. :7/:1/87 '2/29/95 , c c':er tl 35 J;V'AVA. °A';t .. "•/""p° '2129!°. c. ':'der tl 39 PRHARCG. 3AR"'A ""^.'/93 '2/29/95 d':e- R l^. i!22C, RC9ER' " ':? '2/29/95 :'cer i 9' 9CGGEAU, 484". A, :'/C'/93 '2/29/B5 c°1da• i e2 SC4VCECEA, JAMES E. C'/Ot/03 '2/29/95 :z- tl -', S".PAYE%, YA4C4 V :'/9'/93 '2;29/93 °otae^ 4 6e 5!LYA, CAA!O5 B'./:!JB3 !2/29/@3 :'der t d5 S!XPSON, lC; XA9!E S. :7:'193 '2/29/85 e eS SM!7EA!E, 8EA!R!rc n.,M Vei !2/29/85 :':er t i+ STCCCAR^., E1:2A9E!M V. ^'/^.•/97 '2/29/85 a ce• t ~' 'A!S, 8R!G:' ::/91/8) '2/2918` °':er 4 a9 "CHAS, :ANEB X. 77C'/87 12(29/8! ~:':e^ t S: 'C94E2, '!NC - C'/^.'/93 '2/29/9'. :'oer t E' AASSEAMAN LAIRc,N :'/C'/!7 '2/^.9/!3 c c'aer 6 S2 X'!T4E°, NA4" ;. ""C'/83 '2/29/95 ' °:'der S E) AA:'YE", 9E% A, 7'/C1/83 12/29/95 :':er 4 °.a e!'-SON, :ANc.S :'/C'/°.'. '2/29l9E ricer A 55 NOLFF, N!CHAEI :'/:'/83 12/29/83 cd cent 36 Y'J, AUBIX "'/^.'/°.7 '2729/ec :'ee^ A 51 GAGME, L!NCA N. ^.'/7'/93 12/29/95 -d~ce^ 4 58 GUGTAF3AN, NETS A. C1/^,'; a? '2/29;5° ''der 9 S9 HANIEY, PAT!!C!A 7'/;'/93 '2/29/95 c:'de^ 6 6C .OHNSTON, CURT!8 E. ".'/^.'/93 '2/29195 °_`:er a c.' 'A4Xp, HAAAY R. ;^.'/97 '2/29/95 91ce^ i 52 S4EAC, CONX!E _, "'/C V!3 @/29/oc -'der l1 5? +A'.Y57, SAVCAA L. ~ :'/:'!!3 '2!29/93 ~._ :a. :EpARr!a 9atu ASST.::' is Resolution No. 90-*** Page I1 ..'° Cf 4ANCP0 CE'CAMCNW 7es;ruc:ian Nat!`icatim 4epc^; aAGE: 3 ;A•E: 09/.9/97 °irE: 09: 2~:25C ''.e `:"or ; ^ewres are sahedu led hr des:^r;'r. o'ease i-r ca:e ;er -e_ ca;cr ru:, s!pn end return :c REC'RG5 ~A9A3Erc.9r ".E'ARrrE9' Y '-e •ec:^s '^s;ec 5e!w naY a:'. ne destrcyee Y ¢e:e',, •`cse ~erreC rte an % 'cr ___.... acr.;hs, lest^y •es: 4E3:%"5 :^C47:V:":?: f:'"V rp4` =~- ,. :cc' PANE: cE45C89E'. •A:'. 5C +s'1 :A'OE :e- - i¢ 9EE3 "w -c'.e• R c.5 CC4ac_5o/90.L:905 '.:S': YCE - 5e EV4C'..NEY^ =uarE Original Poor Quality o4CNE: ?%': 2'0 acWAXEXr, 4ECCRC C!R. ".ES'RCY 4E'R; EVAL 9CN 4CN .V^. LOCA':CN 9cx 09-'990 7AiE 5EY' `" _________________________________________________________ ""07/83 !2/29/95 - :'/:';93 '2/29/e5 ';'/C Y33 '2/29!9= :1/9'/93 12/29/oc . /0'/93 '2/29/95 cer ¢ 59 CPANGE ='4N5 :'; "'/93 '2/29/95 'a:er ;neR'rcyr uEA^. :a:e: 155'. C.'v Ar. ycv e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT BATE: Noveiaber ~, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bosa, Deputy City Engineer BY: Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securityy and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Nalntenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 for 6, for Parcel Map 13125 located an the southwest corner of Trademark Street and Center Avenue, submitted by Burke Commercial Development. P~COMMEMOATION IL is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 13125, accepting the sub~ett agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance 01str1ct No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the MAyar and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Parcei Map 13125, located on the southwest corner of Trademark Street and Center Avenue, 1n the Industrial Park District, subarea 6 of the industrial """t' m-_ -d •. .w. m- ..a- n.....~..t., c.,.~ ~e loon yw i.u' upy. ui• uj .. .. .. u~ .. .. .°i~ .. • uii j . , for the~creatlon of one 9.6 acre percel~ Por condominium purposes. The Developer, Burke Commercial Development, Ts submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improveaents in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 544.000.00 labor and Material Bond: 522,000.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit: S 2,400.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's OfP1ce. Letters of approval have been received from the Cucamonga County Nater District. C.C. 8 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Natver to Annexation form signed Dy the Davetaper is an ffle to the City Clerk's office. Respectful//ly submitted, f`+, PY:~h Attachments RESOLUTION N0. ! D _~/1~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL IMP NUMBER 13125, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY NNEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 13125, submitted by Burke Commercial Development, and consisting of 1 parcel, located on the southwest corner of Trademark and Center Avenue, for the creation of one 9.6 acre parcel for condominium proposes was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on February 14, 1990, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and NHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 13125 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and NHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approvai of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Burke Commercial Development as developer. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by sold developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 15 hereby authorizM to Ginn ca1A Tanrnrawwnf aa.warM ,.. ti.p.is s LM. ri... of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that sold Darcel Map No. 13125 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer 1s authorized to present setae to the County Recorder to be filed for record. 5~ RESOLUTION N0. Qy` y /~jt~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Cttt OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINIENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 AND STREET LIGNTIN6 IMINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL IMP 13125 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the tertas of tfie "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lightlrtg Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Llghtfrtg Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred W as the "MaintRnance District"); arM WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and lighting Act of 1912" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated hereto 6y this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have f11 ed with tM ftti. !''c .• .heir written consent to the oremne.d ;Q;;gL;un wttnout notice and heartn or f'17sy "i an engineer's "Report". ~ 9 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CItt OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREOY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That Lhis leglsiative body hereby orders the annexation of the props as shorn Tn Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attathed hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including fiery of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed Hereunder. ~'a 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAMTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGFITMiG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ /3/25 EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: PARCEL NAP 13125 N0. OF U.U. OR ACREAGE: 9.6 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 19.2 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of La s to be Mnexed District No. , 1 -° --- --- --- --- 6 2 --- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Caaaanity Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street NaNe Equest.Trail Sq. ft• Sq. ft. Ea. 3 Center 8 T~oueNp~b I1re.l ___ ___ ___ g JAA:11/07/90 i r, CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,120NGA STAFF REPORT GATE: November 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: SMnW Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. Hackett, Contract C1vT1 Engineer f SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I and 6 far Parcel Map 11940, located on the southeast corner of Nhite Oak Avenue and Elm Avenue, submitted by Sahama Development Camparly, Incorporated RECOMIEIN)ATION It is recannended that the Ctty Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Mep 11940, acceptl~ the subfect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance Dtstrict Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Parcel Map 11940, located on the southeast corner of Nh1 to Oak Avenue and tlm Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission on December 14, 1988, for the division of 2.96 acres into 20 parcels. The Developer, Bahama Development Company, Incorporated, 15 submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the fallowing amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: (32,200.00 Labor and Naterlal Bond: (16,100.00 Monumentation f 3,400.00 Copies of Lhe agreement and security, and Lhe Consent and Neiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's Office. Res~pe/ctful~ly sQubm~i~tted, ,~Vtnh. OLr~ SB:LEH:JAA:d1w Attachments RESOLUTION N0. QTR/~// A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAD NUM9ER 11940 (TENTATIVE PARCEL IMP N0. 119401, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IIaoROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap No. 11940, subaitted by Bahama Qevelopment Compagy, Incorporated, aM consisting of 20 parcels, located on the southeast corner of White Oak Avenue and Elm Avenue, being a division of 2.96 acres Tnto 20 parcels was approved by the Planning Coaanission of the Ctty of Rancho Cucanronga on December 14, 1988. WHEREAS, Parcel Map Na. 11940 15 the final asp of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirewents established as prcrequlslte Lo approval of the F1na1 Map by the Ctty Council of said City have now been set by entry into an I~rove~ent Agreea~ent guaranteed by acceptable Iagrovaaent Security by Bahasa Oevelopaent Coapa~y, Incorporated as developer. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said IaproveaKnt Agreeaknt and said Improvement Security subaltted by said developer be and the sane are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, aM the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map No. 11940 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to Aa filoA fem. rtr:urd , }+-, ~1C/ ~: RESOLUTION N0. (~~ _(l'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE IMINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 11940 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaawnga, California, has previously forced a special naintenance district pursuant to the tenas of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1472", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, sold special maintenance district knovm and designated as Landscaye Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Malntercnce Dl strict"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this tiaM• the Ctty Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the properq~ described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the NN ntenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to Llle proposed annexation w7LneUL notice and 'nearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, TNEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON6A HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLgiS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all Lrue and correct. SECTION 2: Thet this legislative Dody hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work prograe areas as described to Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Nalntenance District. SECTION 3: That aii future proceedings of the Maintenance District, lnduding~F~Te~ of alt assessax!nts, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 57 EXHEIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIARiRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LKiF1TNIG MAMITENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 J ` J ~. d. ~~ ~ i F` s ,.~ .w # ~ y ... i.w i~ I .~ t1TE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONaA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO pM ~ i44o _ STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT °B' PROJECT NAME: PARCEL NAP 11940 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 2.96 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 5.92 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of L s to be Annexed District No. 1 --- 9 --- --- --- 6 --- --- --- --- -'- LANDSCAPE IMINTENANCE DISTRICT Community Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Name Equest.Tra11 Sa• ft. Sc. ft. Ea. 3 Nh1te Oak 1 --- --- --- 17 Elm Avenue j JM:11/07/90 T~~: 5~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena. Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Ymprovement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance DT strict Nos. 1 and 2 for Parcel Map 114)3, located on the south side of Hamilton Street, east of Hermosa Avenue, submitted by Bruce Nei RECOMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Paroel Map 11473, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation t0 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 aM authorizing the Mayor and Lhe City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Parcel Map 11473, located on the south side of Hamilton Street, east of rim ii,uid .~. - T6 t!:C Iw p.,/AanH al Davol anment DistHCL. Was approved by the Planning Caamissi on on April 12, 1989, for the division of 1.15 acres into 4 parcels. The Developer. Bruce Net, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the cons~ructlon of the off-site improvements to the following amounts: Faithful Performance 9ond: f4,900.00 Labor and Material Bond: f2,450.00 Monumentation Cash Band: (2,600.00 Copies of the agreement aM security are avallab/e 1n the Ctty Clerk's Office. The Consent and Maiver Lo Annexation form signed by the Developer 1s on file 1n the City Clerk's office. Respectf//idly submitted, ~I+, SB :NV:JM: d1 w Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 9D ~ g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11473, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY NHEREA5, Tentative Parcel Map No. 11473, submitted by Bruce Nei, and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the south side of Hamilton Street, east of Hermosa, vas approved by the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on April 12, 1989, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Locai Ordinance No. 26 adopted pursuant to that Act; and MHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 11473 is the final map of the division of land approved as shorn on said Tentative Parcel Map; and NHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security by Bruce Nei as developer. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Ioprovement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayar is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behelf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map No. 11473 be and the same is hereby aoornveA anA thr city inalnear T< authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be flied for record. ~_ ~~ ~/ RESa.uTIDN No. gD , 7~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEJ(ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE M1IINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING IMINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR PARCEL MAP 11473 NHEREAS, the Ciq Council of the Ciq of Rancho Cucaaronga, California, has previously forsied a special saintenance district pursuant to the tenas of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special xwtintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance Otstrlct No. 1, Street Lighting Mafntenance Distrlet No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and NHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this ttafe Lhe Ciq Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the properq described on Exhtblt `A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and NNEREAS, all of the owners of properq within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance Dtstrlct have filed with the Ciq Clerk their written consent to Lhe DroPOSed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMDNGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLONS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown fn Exhibit "A" and the wbrk prograwt areas as described in Exhtblt "B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance 0lstrict, lncluding~ffi&TTof all assessax!nts, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. f0 4~ .A. ASSESSMEN4 DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 Q l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONdA ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO .,' STATE OF CALIFORNIA PM ~ X473 EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME: Parcel Nap 11473 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 1.15 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 8 asses units pcl . 1: .28 2: .28 3: .29 4: .30 TTS acres STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lan s to be Annexed District No. 1 --- --- "' '-' -'- 2 5 --- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Casuunity Turf Ground Cover OTstrlct No. Street Naas E4uest.Trai1 Sa• ft• So. ft. I Namllton St. --- --- --- JAAllI-07-90 Trees Ea. 8 Gy STAFF REPORT V~ DATE: Noveaber 7, 1990 T0: CTty Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy C1ty Engineer BY: Jce Stofa, Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of a Grant of Easement Document between Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of providing electrical service to residential property, located north of Base L1ce Road between Mi111ken Avenue and Rochester Arenue It is recommended that the C1ty Council adopt Lhe attached resolution approving the Grant of Easeaw!nt Document between Southern California Edison Company and the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga and authorize the Mayor and the Ciq~ Clerk to sign setae. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Southern California Edison Company has submitted a Grant of Easeaw!nt ^^t:^caL .~ .r., ri«. .,q o,...r,. r.-=-.,._..~. f~. tti. ..~~.".qsa ,.f ~.,.Y~.~tnn electrical service to residential property by installing electrical vaults within the City owned property at no cost to the City. The vaults will be placed within the C1ty maintained landscape area along with the proper screening and will be located north of Base Line Road between Milliken and Rochester Avenues (Exhibit "A".) A copy of the Easement Docuaent 1s available in the Ctty Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ~;,.~, ~ SB:JS:dlw Attachment ~V RESOLUTION N0. y O . ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A GRANT OF EASEMENT DOCUMENT BETNEEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROYSDIN6 ELECTRICAL SERVICE 70 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LOCATED NOFTH OF BASE LINE ROAD BETNEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucanronga has for its consideration a Grant of Easement Oocuaa!nt from Southern Callforn/a Edison Caapany: and NNEREAS, the Easement provides for the installation of electrical vaults north of Base Line Road between Milliken and Rochester Avenues; and NHEREAS, Clty hereby considers said tnstaltetton of eiatricat vaults essential to an orderly development of the City. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0N611 HEREBY RESOLVES that said Easement Document be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is authorized t0 sign setae on behalf of the City and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~N a a J 6 ~~ 7 DnrE: T0: Fl10M: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT November 7, 1990 (1 City Council and City Manager LJ Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer i Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector F.~~- Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 6937 located at 13245 Victoria Street RECONEIDATIOM: The required street improvements for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 6937 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and tt is recommended that City Council accept sold improvements, authorize the Deputy City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the C1q~ Clerk to reiease the Faithful Performance Certificates of Deposit 1n the amounts of 53,410 and (1.000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS D.rrnl 1 nF Darral Wn fi0i7 _ lnra}eA .} 1R96F Vir}nrla Cfrooi DEVELOPER: Michael Perez 13245 Vfctoria Street Rancho Cucamonga, Cp 91739 Release: Faithful Performance Certificates of Deposit (Street) f3,430 and 21,000 Respectfully submitted, !b'~f SB:SMG:dIw Attachments ~P RESOLUTION N0. 9~ - ~~ A RESOLUTION OF Tiff CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGl1, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS FOR PARCEL I OF PARCEL MAP 6937 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHERE'AS, the constructton of publfc t~aprovewents for Parcel I of Parcel Map 6937 have been caaRleted to the satisfaction of Lhe City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Caapletion is required to be filed, certifying the work conrylete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaagnga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to stgn and file a Notice of Conpletlon with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. G9 ~,; . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SU&IECT: November 7, 1990 City Council and City Manager SM ntu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Steve M. Gtllilznd, Pub11c Norks Inspector I~-=' Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Nottce of Completion for Tract 14150 (formerly Tract 13271) locate.l on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 14150 have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, and 1t is recommended that C11y Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance 6uarentee Bonds in the amounts of 57,850, 515,360 and 565,300, authorize the Deputy City Engineer to file a Nottce of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amounts of 578,500, 5153,600 and 5653,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14150 - located on the northwest corner of Terra Yista Parkway and M1111ken Avenue. DEYELOPER: Lewis Names of California 1156 North Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bonds (Street) M111iken/Mt. V1ew Milliken/Foothtlt 7R 14150 to Base Ltne to Mt. V1ew 5 7,850 S 15,360 S 65,300 Release: Faithful Performance Bonds (Street) 578,500 5153,600 ~ 653,000 Re~sp'ectf/ally submitted, ~7/~ SB:SMG:dI w Attachment 7d RESOLUTION N0. ~~ L~a~- A RESOLUTION ~ THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14150 (FORMERLY TRACT 13271) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHERFAS, the construction of public Improvements for Tract 1415D have been completed to the satisfaction of the CTty Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Coagletlon is requtred to be filed, certifying the work coarylete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaronga hereby resolves, that the work Ts hereby accepted and the City Engineer 1s authorized to sign and f11e a Notice of Caaipletlon with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~_. ~-- 7~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 T0: City Council and Ctty Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer ate' BY: Steve M. Gilliia nd, Public Ibrks Inspector I-S SUBJECT: Release of Faithful Performancz Bond and Labor d Material Bond for the landscaping of Tract 13565-1 thru -4, located at the northeast corner of Suawit Avenue and Hardman Bullock Road. RECONENDATION: It is recomaended that the City Council release the Faithful Performance and Labor 8 Material Bonds 1n the amounts f975,000 and 5468,000, respectively. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13565, located at the northeast corner of Sumait Avenue and Hardman Bullock Road, is being developed by Standard Pacific Development. The County of San Bernardino aetepted agreements and bonds for the landscape ,.~ ce~tw.ho. ?a tuna The ~miert we t,ansfurwA to tM fi ty of Ra nrhn Cucamonga on November 1, 1989. The City then requested that Standard Pacific submit new bonds to secure the landscape installation. The new bonds are in the amounts of 51,006,500 and 5503,250. By obtaining these bonds, tt is being recommended that Ctty Council release the bonds that were transferred to the City by the County of Sen Bernardino. Developer: Standard Pacific of Orange County 1565 M. Mac Arthur Boulevard Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 5976,000 ~ Labor and Material Bond 5486,OW Respectfullynsubmitted, D SB:SMG:sd 'Attachment +~ /~ ,{ DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.IIONGA STAFF REPORT November 7, 1990 (~ City Council and C1ty Managery Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Narks Inspector l~~_ Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for i3235 Yictoria Street. The required street improvements for 13235 Ylctoria Street have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, and it Is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the Deputy City Engineer to f11e a Notice of Completion and authorize the C11ilr Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond to Lhe amount of ;5,550.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Located at 13235 Victoria Street Release: DEVELOPER: Alfredo and Clara Murillo 13235 Victoria Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) ;5,550.00 Respectfully submitted, ,~.,~, /ioa. SB:SMG:Iy Attachment .":. RESOLUTION N0. 90 . ~~, j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FGR 13235 VICTORIA STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE Of COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for 13235 Victoria Street have been completed to the satisfaction of the Deputy City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Conpletton is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Deputy City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~- :F v -a a 7y >it' r~rmv nc v e u~un rt rr a aanu~ e STAFF REPORT DATE: November B, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shinto Bose, Deputy City Engineer gy: Michael D. Long, Senior Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Accept Parks Maintenance and Retrofit Construction at various City parks, Contract No. 40-022, as camglete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion". RECDIlEIOATION: It is recamaended that City Council accept the Parks Maintenance and retrofit Construction at various City parks, Contract Nn. 90-022, as complete, authorize the City to file a "Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount 5512,013.50 to be used as the Maintenance Bond, and authorize the release of the retentton 1n the amount of ;24,346.01 and the Labor and Materials Bond 1n the amount of ;512,013.50 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have Deen received, Also, approve the final contract amount of taAfi;970.11. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The sub,~ect project has been completed to accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on protect documentation, 1s 5512,013.50 which includes 3 contract change orders for additional concrete walks, deletion of unnecessary concrete work, reroofing of existing buildings, agdlftcatlon of 9rr1gatlon systems and other miscellaneous work. Respectfully submitted, 5~ ~ D SB:MDL:~h Attachment 75 RESOLUTION N0. G{D ~ [f~'1)G A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARKS WIINTENANCE AND RETROFIT CONSTRUCTION AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS, CONTRACT N0. 90-022, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public iaproveeents for Parks Maintenance and Retrofit Gmstruction at various City parks, Contract No. 90-022, have been coa~pleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: and WHEREAS, a Notice of Capletion is required to be flied, certifying the work coaplete. NLM, THEREFORE, the C1Ly Council of the Ciq~ of Rancho Cucaeangga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the C11;y Engineer is authorized to sign and file a ibtlce of Caa~pletion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~~ /~ nx.m~ nn n STAFF ftEPOBT y~ DATE: November 7, 1990 T0: CTty Council and City Manager FROM: SMnW Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector ti. SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 88-14, located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 8th Street, submitted by Noll au Development Company, Incorporated RECONMEMDATION It is recaa~oended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the constructl on of the public 1 rovements for OR 88-14 were approved by the City Council on October 5, 1989, In the following amounts: r~. t~<~1 n-.Tf:..~i..~.r: .°.:.A.~.: ~, a enn ~,-`_ Labor and Material Band: f 9.250 The developer, Notlau Development Coapagy, Incorporated, is requesting approval of a 4 month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Iaryrovement Agreement Extension are available to the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, SB:SMG:dIw Attachments ~7 RESOLUTION No. I L~ ~ i.~dJ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGl1, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 88-14 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an tmprovement Agreement Extension executed on November 7, 1990, by Nolteu Development Company, Incorporated, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adiacent to the rest property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue aM 8th Street; and NHEAEAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject t0 the tenas thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DR 88-14; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City CouMil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign sold Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. /1o/!am ~'urelv~bnzent '~ii~iavr~ tlJl E. LA PALMA. STE. D ANAHEIM. CA eIDW mu ealwel 'Original_Poor Quality UVty LBT S• "_!. Cit.Y ct karcho _'u:;amo::ga ~;cmmur.ity Development Uepartmrnt i05n0 .i-u ~ 'enter llr., P. ox dU~ kan_'hc' ~ucaT••;n:;d. Ca. °i7~9 Attn: "tevc M. Gii liland EI':g lneer L:~ [11Vi~lAn Re: f1k3H-t4 ilea Y' .]1,': We are wrlfing t^ requesr_ an extension of the Improvement Agreeme:a [or Dk3S-14 which has exFired. We have been deiayei~ ~anP'-^t _:~:g t;:P~e i.rem~ prr the fallowing. 1. The Fr,vthill F'lra L`istrict lsst:ed 3 "StoF Wor}: Nati,~a" s::d th•~ ur.il ity :~vmpanies have not yet Completed :he rrrlnCati sn T!:e otiity rompa;iiea n;ust .-omV?.eta, their wi:rk before w.: in_*ali the si3ewalYs and drive approach. However. we wi.l ins ta..i .~ Fort i~:n of the walks now a:r4 comF-ate them wt:en t;::: ~,aility o:~mFanie_ are thro•i3h, educe we hsve been unable to eatabli.;h a r_cmpletinn car.~••wita Edis~~n and GTE, we are hereby requesting an e:<tensicn of four ^nn`hs. Think ycu for your attention t.o this matter. Ycure truly Nea~ N';1~~~ PIC,N/r: ~S•PY , '..1.: ~. ... ~ ' ':,..,. nrmv nc n a r.rr rrn n STAFF REPORT DATE: November ), 1990 (1 T0: City Council and City Manager L~ FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engtneer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works inspector 1~~~ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 11838, located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Ytctorfa Park Lane, submitted by The William Lyon Company RECplENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subJed agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sfgn said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee Lhe construction of the public tmproveeients for Parcei Map 11838 were approved by the City Council on October 5, 1989, in tha following dmuWiLi: Faithfu] Performance Bond: 5608,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5304,000 The developer, The William Lyon Company, 1s requesting approval of a 12 month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are avaita6le 1n the City Cierk's Office. Reps/pact/fully submitted, .~1v~'~ SB:SMG:d1w Attachments 0 V ~~ ~~'ILLI:1~i L1'Olr ~~n~nian~r 85x0 ARCHIBALD, SUITE B, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 (71d~ 980-4444 Oc Caber 8, 1990 Mr. Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspector City nE Rancho Cucamonga Pose Office Boz 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject: Parcel Map 11838 Request for Extention of Improvement Agreement Dear Mr. Gilliland, Pursuant [o your letter dated October 1, 1990, we would like to request a twelve (l2) man[h a%ten[ion of the above Improvement Agreement. This extent ion is necessary due to the phased construction of Hughes Investments neighborhood commercial center. Although phase I is nearing comp Let ion, phase lI will not be completed Eor approximately one (1) year. ~~_..,. ..... ___. _u....__, ._c______ __ __ ____ _.,_.... __ .. i„ ,.~ nom ~~.... Sincerely, ~y- Oon Jackson Construction Manager ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ae ~ Inland Empire Division CCT 1 '^oD G ~ fvF pANCIi . ...ill . .:AI.rP!h~ :. 9~1 Y~ 1::: RESOLUTION N0. ~~ ~. C~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND I6PROVENENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL IMP 11838 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CaTifcrnia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 7, 1990, Dy The Nilliam Lyon Compagy as developer, for the Improvement of public right-of-way ad3acent to the real property specifically described therefn, and generally located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane; and NHEREAS, the Installation of such improvements, described 1n said Improvement Agreement and subject to the tares thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Darcel Map 11838; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, wh1cA 1s identified 1n said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOiI, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said [mprovement Security be and the soak are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign Bald Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. c~+-- uZ non n vn~.n. STAFF REPORT OgTE: Norea~ber 7, 1990 (~ T0; Ctty Council and City Manager v FROM: Shtntu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspects SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agresment Extension for OR 87-34, located on the west side of Archibrid Avenue south of Base Line Raad, submitted by ARCM, Ltd. RECOI~EIDATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,{ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/B1ICKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements for OR 87-34 were approved by the City Council on October 19, 1989, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bored: f36,3UU.W Labor and Material Boni: f18,15D.00 The developer, ARCM, Ltd., is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on Bald improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in Lhe City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, SB:SMG:1y Attachments ~3 1 A R C M, LTD., A CalHornla Limited Partnership e]OE OeMty AWaM lbnlry VakG G1TM (Ot~pPp-1ZN FA%(e18)ao'!-OW~ G'~? , October 12, 1990 " n,. ~ . %' ~~ r ~9p ~ ;i; Steve M. Gilliland '°,,,.~ Communityp Development Department "' Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Ra: Improvement Agreement for DR 87-34 Dear Sir, As the General Partner of ARCM, Ltd., A California Limited Partnership, I would like to request an extension of time of Six (a) months to complete the terms as indicated Sn the subject Improvement Agreement. The conmtructi.on of the public •idewelk and mtreet 6edication is scheduled to begin after the medical buildinngq im substantially completed. Tha current schedule for the pu6ldc sidawelk is to begin construction in earl November 1, 1990. Tha rec~uastad Six !6 months wxT.wnwinn inrtn .o a1.,. •w. ~n a_._~a_ ....r-,1__ti~_.t period required by the City. Enclosed ppisses find the Improvement A eement Extension, executed in tr:tplicate and a check of 5251.00 issued to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Pleaea contact ma if there is any questions or further information you need. Sincerely yours, ~~~~ Camilla O. Lis General Partner ARCM, Ltd., S Calltornla Limited Fartnarahip COL: ckt ARCM-STE.LTR A RESOLUTION N0. 9 ~ ~ ~f~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 87-34. NHEREAS, the City Couneil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 7, 1990, by ARCM Ltd., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base L1ne Road; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in sate Improvement Agreement and subject to the terws thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DR 87-34; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and acconpanled by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, TNEREFgIE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Ltprovement Security be and the same are hereby approved and tha Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Irproveabnt Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. (_,N~ ~~ g5 DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT November 7, 1990 (Z C1ty Council and City Manager' Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Steve M. G41191and, Public Works Inspector II Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10296, iocated on the south west corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue, submitted by JCR Development RECOMMENDATION It 1s recommended that the C1ty Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and euthorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 1024b were approved by the C1ty Council on October 19, 1989, in the following amounts: raltnful Perfernmnce Bond: 5174,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: = 86,500.00 The developer, JCR Development, is requesting approval of a 11-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the C1ty Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, SB:SMG:Iy Attachments ~~ _~ J C R DEVElOPM61R 6 gIVESTMH1IT 9W M9tlDiN RvE,RnIfW98P, CA 91803 • 915.(818)308-3444 • ffir: (BI B)577~4638 Oc tuber 12,1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O.Dox 807 Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 Attention: Steve M. Gilliland COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION RE: Request for Extension for Improvement Agreement - Tract 10246 Lear Sir: We have received your letter informing us that the Improvement Agreement for Tract 10246 will expire on October 18,1990. Therefore, we hereby request an extenuion of the Improvement Agreement due to the followi rg: 1. Expiration of Construction Loan. 2. Unexpected costs. iue exrension t>.me ^eeded is approximately I1 months. During this time period, we will renew our Constructton Loan and fur r.ish funds to cover the unexpected costs. If you have any questions, please contact our office at the above reference number. ~espec ull ~~ ap c/ ~rnera ~rtne r / CHH/es ~~ i.., RESOLUTION N0. d~ D , [.fa~S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYIN6 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROYEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10246 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 7, 1990, Dy JCR Development as developer, for the improvement of publ/c right-of-wAy ad,~acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the south west corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject t0 the terns thereof, is to be done 1n conjunction with the development of said Tract 10246; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improveme^t Security, which 1s identified to said Improvement Agreement Extenslon~ NON, THEREFORE, the C1;y Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension end said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. -t~- ~ ~O ~. ORDINANCE N0. 426 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGR MU NICiPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE STANDARDS NFPA 13D AND NFPA 13R, BOTH PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF RUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES ANO CERTAIN BUIL OIN GS ACCESSORY THERETO, WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, OELET IONS RND E%L'EPTi0N5 TO SAID CODES A. Recitals. (i) Article 2, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 1, Title 5 of the California Government Code authorizes adoption by reference of National fire Protection Association Standards NFPA 130, 1989 edition, and NF PR 13R, 1989 edition, each as published by the National Fire Protection Rssociation. (ii) At least one copy of each of said Standards, certified as a full, true and correct copy thereof by the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50022.6. (iii) R duly noticed public hearing as required by Government Code ao~r;~" Fnn~~ Z hav haen ronducted and concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. (iv) qll legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. G. Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: SECTION 1; In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, part A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2: Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code entitled 'B uildinar and Construction", ^_f the City Co until of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended, provided that said amendment sha7i not apply to or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, and proof ded further that the Uniform Codes adopted and amended by Ordinance No. 412 of this City shall continue to be applicable to construction for whfch permits have been issued prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 3: Chapter 15.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Section 15.12.166 and 15.12,168 to read as follows: ~/ Ordinance No. 426 Page 2 15.12.166 Section 3802(h) Amended - Group R, Division 1, Occu anti es. Section 3802 h of said Uniform Building Code is amen a to rea a5 fo ows: Section 3802(h) Group R, Division 1, Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every Group R, Division 1, Occupancy as follows: In every apartment house 3 or more stories in height or contain- ing more than 15 dwelling units, and every hotel 3 or more stories in hei gist or containing 20 or more guest rooms, the system is to be installed 1n accordance with UBC Standard 38-1, "Design Installation and Acceptance of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems", except ':hat residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. The water flow alarm for such systems shall be monitored by an approved central station. 2. In all new Group R, Division 1, Occupancies, other than those specified in subsection (h) 1, above, the system shall be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Spr~nkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monastf!ri es Less than Three Stories fn Height". 15.12.168 Subsections 3802 (i )R (j) and (k) Added - Group R, Oivi si on 3 and Group H, Oiv son cc~b uoanc~es an econs tructe u6-'il-di n9s. Section 3802(f) Group R, Di vi sf on 3, Occupancies. An automatic fi rP Cnri n4l{nn eyetam <bll ho lee"all"d in .11 ~-~~- r Division 3, Occupancies. System design and installation shall be conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 38-4, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lod gf ng Houses". (j) Group M, Division 1, Occupancies. Rn automatic fire sprinkling system shall be installed in ail new Group M, Division 1, Occupancies constructed within 10 feet of a sprinklered residential occupancy on the same property. EXCEPTION: Group M, Iivision 1, Occupancies exempt from permit requirements by Section 301(b) 1. of the Uniform Rdministrative Code, as adopted. Such buildings attached to or accessory to residential buildings may be supplied from the system serving the primary uso, however; piping and installation within the accessory portions shall be in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1. ;~v Ordinance No. 426 Page 3 (k) Reconstructed Buildings. Any existing building of an occupancy referred to in subsection (h}, (i} or (j) of this Section, that is hereafter damaged as a result of fire, earthquake or other disaster, and which requires substantially complete demolition and reconstruc- tion, shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system as specified in the pertinent subsection. SECTION 4: Chapter 15.14 is hereby added to Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, adopted by Ordinance 412, of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to read in words and figures as foliows: CHAPTER 15.14 Uniform Building Code Standards Sections: 15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope 15.14.030 Sec Lion 2-1.3 Amended - Insi~ection and Testing 15.14.040 Section 2-4.2 Amended - Firt: Department Connections 15.14.050 Section 2-4.6 Amended - Alarms 15.14.060 Section 2-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers 15.14.070 Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 Added - pdo pti on of NFPA 130 Standard by Reference 15.14.080 Section 1.1 /upended - Scope 15.14.090 Section 1-5.1.2 Amended - Li~:ted and Approved 15.14.100 Section 1-5.1.4 Amended - Te:.ting and Inspection 15.14.110 Section 3-1.1 Amended Valves and Drains t5 to tin a"ter;,." ?_5 emerngn _ nl.~c 15.14.130 Section 3-7 Added - Ff re Department Connection 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers Standartl s, adopted by Ordinance No. 412 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 13R Standard, 198!1 Edition, published by the National Fire Protecttan Association, Inc. Said IIFPA 13R Standard shall be referenced as Uniform Building Code Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less Than Three Stories in Height" and shat) be utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler system:~~ required by Section 3802 (h) 2. of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by this Ordinance, except as further amended by Sections 15.14.020 thrmtgh 15,14,050 following, Section 15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - S•c ee. Section 1-1 of said Uniform building Coe Stan ar 38-3 5 hereby amendE~d to read as follows: ~1 Ordinance No. 426 Page 4 Section 1.1 Scope. This standard shall he used in design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems installed in residential occupancies less than 3 stories in height, not withstanding any conflicting story-height referenced herein. Section 15.14.030 Section 2-1.3 Amended - Ins ec tion and Tes tin . Section 2- 3 of sa d Um form Bui ding Code Standard 36-3 is hereby amen a to read as follows: Section 2-1.3(a) Inspection and Testing, All supply piping shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with IiFPA 13 Standard. qil systems shall be flow tested in accordance with Ranc ha Cucamonga Fire District Standards. (b) Inspection shall be requested by the permittee at stages of construction as outlined below: When underground piping is complete but prior to concealment of any portion thereof and prior to connection to the overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are Lo be in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized fo^ inspection. When all overhead piping, fittings and riser are installed but prior to concealment of any portion the ^eof. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized fur inspection. 3. When piping has been concealed and all sprinkler heads, alarm hall (e 1. floc and Fa mnov va~one od .. Mw..i ..- .+...•~-.. «.,,-~ and/or~connected. Testing of associated devices, i.e., alarms, flaw and tamper valves and monitoring systems is to be conducted at this time. Section 15.14.040 Section 2-4.2 Amend ad - Fire De artment Connection. Rt least one, 1-1/2 inch or one, 2-1/2 inch ire department connection shall be pro of dad when the sprinkler system has 20 sprinklers or more. Fire department connections shall be located in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. Section 1514.050 Section 2-4.6 Amended - Alarms. Section 2-4.6 of said Uniform Bui ding Code Stan and is ereby amended to read as follows: Section 2-4.6 Alarms. All water flow alarms shall be monitored by an appro•led central station in accordance with pane ho G!ca!aon ge Fire Protection DS Strict standards. Section 15.14.060 Section 2-6 Amended - Louition of S rinklers. Section 2-6 o said Un orm Bu ng o e tan ar - s ere y amen a as follows: 9~ Ordinance No. 426 Page 5 Section 2-6 Location of Sprinkl ers. Sprinklers shall be installed in all areas. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Sprinklers may be omitted from bathrooms not exceeding 55 sq.ft. in area with non-combustible plumbing fixtures. 2. S^r'^kl e.^s ^.:ay b: o;nitted `ror sa~a71 clothes closets where the least horizontal dimensior~ does not exceed 3 sq.ft. and the floor area does not exceed 24 sq.ft- and the walls and ceiling are surfaced with material of Class I flame-spread classification, as defined in Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. 3. Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes ar storage. a ca naaras aao plea by Urdi nonce No. 412 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 130 Standard, 1989 Editfon published by the National Fire Protection Associ atlon, Inc. Said NFPA 13D Standard shall be referenced as Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4. "Installation of Automatic ff re Sprinkler !~ys terns in Dwellings and Lodging Nouses", and shall be utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems required by Section 3802 (i) and (j) of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by this n_ ~ -cc, =..~a F~t "- (w Liam mnm~ueu by SectiUnS iD,14. UtlU tnrou gn 15.14.140 following, Section 15.14.080 Section 1.1 Amended - Sco e. Section 1.1 of said Ilnifo rm Building Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amen ed to read as follows: Section 1.1 Scope, This standard shall be used in the design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems installed in dwellings and lod<i ng houses and in certain accessary buildings, not with- standing any references herein to mobilehomes. Section :5.14.090 Section 1-5.1,2 Amended - L',sted and A roved Devices. Sec tt or 1-5.1,2 of said Un orm Bu ing Code tandar - s hereby amended to read as follows: \4f h{nn _F 1 9 13~1nJ -J apprv red devices. uniy n scea Or approved ,devices and~materi als shall be used in automatic fire sprinkler systems. ~'3 Ordinance No. 426 Page 6 E%CEPTION: Listing may be waived for tanks, pumps and for support devices as permitted by Section 3-4.1. Use of unlisted devices shall be approved by the Building Official with the concurrence of the Fire Chief. Section 15.14.100 Section 1-5.1.4 Amended - Testing and Insoec tion. Section 1-~.4 of said Uniform Building Code Standard 314 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1-5.4(a) Inspection and Testing. A11 systems shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard. All systems shall be flow-tested in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. (b) [ns pec tions shall be requested by the permittee at stages of construction as outlined below: 1. When underground piping is complete but prior to concealment of any portion thereof and prior to connection to the overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for inspection. 2. When all overhead piping, fittings and riser are installed but prior to concealment of any portion thereof. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized for inspection. 3. When piping has been concealed and all sprinkler heads, alarm ,.nn !~1 stnw aM •~mnon v~l.mc .nd m nifn Winn An vi roc inc 4al tad and/or connected. Testing of associated devices, ie. alarms, flow and tamper valve<_ and monitoring systems is to be conducted at this time. Section 15.14.110 Section 3-1.1 Amended - Valves and Drains. Section 3- .1 of said Uniform Building Code Stan ar 3 - is hereby omen a to read as follows: Section 3-1.1 Valves and Drains. Each System shall have a single control valve arranged to shut off both Lhe domestic and sprinkler systems, and a separate shut-off for the domestic system only. E%CEPTI ONS: 1. The sprinkler system piping may have a separate control valve where supervised by one of the following methods: a. Central station, proprietary or remote station alarm system. 9~ Ordinance No. 426 Page 7 b. Local alarm service that will cause the sounding of an audible signal at a constantly attended point. 2. A separate shut-off valve is not required for the domestic water supply in multipurpose piping systems. Section 15.14.120 Section 3-6 Amended - Alarms. Section 3-6 of said Uniform Bui ding Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 3-6 Alarms. Local waterflow alarm(s) shall be provided on all systems. The wa terfi ow alarm or alarms shall be located on (a n) exterior wall(s), or such other location(s) as approved by the Building Official with the concurrence of the Fire Chief, and so located as to be audible throughout the building. Section 15.14.130 Section 3-7 Added - Fire Department Connection. Chapter 3 of sa- id Uniform Building Code Standard 36-4 is hereby amended by addition of Section 3-1 to read as follows: Section 3-7 Fire Department Connection. All R-3 occupancies exceeding 5,000 sq.ft. in floor area shall 6e provided with an approved fire department connection installed in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Dist ri r.t standards. Section 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Amended - Location of S rinklers. Section 4-G of said Unlfo rm Bui ding Co a Stan ar 38- is ere by amende to read as follows: SPrtinn Q-6 In aHn nF Cn nLln C...t ..l.l .. _4-, in all areas. ... ... .. ...... _. _. _. ....,..... .,...,~ ..: ,~~..,.~~..,. EXCEPTION: 1. Sprinklers may be omitted from hathrooms not exceeding 55 sq.ft. in floor area with non-combustible plumbing fixtures. 2. Sprinklers may be omitted from small closets where the least horizontal dimension does net exceed 3 sq.ft. and the floor area does not exceed 24 sq.ft. and the walls and ceiling are surfaced with materials of Class I flame spread classification as defined in Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. 3. Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. 4. Sprinklers may be omitted from entrance foyers that are not the only means of egress. 9S Ordinance No. 426 Page 8 SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall remain in effect until the effective date of Ordinance 434 at which time this Ordinance will become null and void. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 9~ ORDINANCE N0. 434 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 15.04 OF T[TLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCRMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING 8Y REFERENCE STANDARDS NI PA 130 AND NFPA 13R, BOTH PUBLISHED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMRTIC FIRE SPRSNKLER SYSTEMS IN RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES AND CERTAIN BUILDINGS ACCESSORY THERETO, W1iH CERTA iN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS AND E%C EPTIONS TO SAID CODES A. Recitals. (i) Rrticle 2, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 1, Title 5 of the California Government Code authorizes adoption by reference of National Fire Protection Association Standards NFPA 13D, 1989 edition, and NFPA 13R, 1989 edition, each as published by the National Fire Protection Association. (i i) At least one copy of each of said Standards, certified as a full, true and correct copy thereof by the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, has been filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50022.6. (iii) A duly noticed public hearing as required by Government Code c nr tine Snro9.4 hoc hPPn rondo r. ted and concluded prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. occurred. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have D. Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set. forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. SECT tON 2; Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code entitled "B•^ld' ^d Co nsiruc t: ^f th^ r;r„ roun_;l ~f the r;ry pf Ranc hn .nqs Cucamonga is~ hereby amended, provided that said amendment shall not apply to or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, and provided further Lhat the Uniform Codes adopted and amended by Ordinance No. 426 of this City shall continue to be applicable to construction for which permits have been issued prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 3: Chapter 15.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Section 15.12.166 and 15.12.168 to read as follows: 97 Ordinance No. 434 Page 2 15.12.166 Section 3802(h) Amended - Group R Division I Occupancies. Section 3802 (h of said Um form Building Code is amende to read as follows: Section 3802(h) Group R, Division 1, Occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every Group R, Division 1, Occupancy as follows: 1. In every aoa rtment hour? 3 or mere stogie=_ in height or ce.^.tain- ing more than 15 dwelling units, and every hotel 3 or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms, the system is to be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1, "Design Installation and Acceptance of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems", ezce pt that residential or quick response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. The water flow alarm for such systems shall be monitored by an approved central station. In ail new Group R, Division 1, Occupancies, other than those specified in subsection (h) 1. above, the system shall be installed in accordance with UBC Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less than Three Stories in Height". 15.12.168 Subsections 3802(1), (j) and (k) Added - Group R, Divi si cn 3 and Group M, Division 1, ccupanci es and Reconstructed Buildings. Section 3802(1) Group R, Division 3, Occupancies. An automatic . n., ~nr ~; ~~~t~ --•• v~ ~~~.~i w~ ~u ~~~ ul Ilcn VI VV~/ f,, Division -3, Occupancies. System design sand installation shall be conducted in accordance with UBC Standard 38-4, "Installation of Automatic fire Sprinkler Systems in Dwellings and Lodging Houses". (.i) Group M, Division 1, Occupancies. An automatic fire sprinkling system shah he installed in alt new Group M, Division 1, Occupa ncf es constructed within 10 feet of a sprinkl ered residential occupancy on the same property. E%CEPTION: Group M, Division 1, Occupancies exempt from permit requirements by Section 301(b} 1. of the Uniform Administrative Code, as adopted. Such buildings attached to or accessory to residential buildings may i,e wnniied from the cyctem cor.;ing the prj ,ary hcacvcr, piping and installation within the accessory portions shall~be in accordance with UBC Standard 38-1. 9g Ordinance No. 434 Page 3 (k) Reconstructed Buildings. Any existing building of an occupancy referred to in subsection (I1), (i) or (j) of this Section, that is hereafter damaged as a result of fire, earthquake or other disaster, and which requires substantially complete demolition and reconstruc- tion, shall he provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system as specified in the pertinent subsection. SECTION 4: Chapter 15.14 is hereby added to Title 15 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, adopted by Ordinance 426, of the City Ca ~cil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to read in words and figures as follows: CHAPTER 15.14 Uniform Building Code Standards Sections: 15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope 15.14.030 Section 2-1.3 Amended - Inspection and Testing 15.14.040 Section 2-4.2 Amended - Fire Department Connections 15.14.050 Section 2-4.6 Amended - Alarms 15.14.060 Section 2-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers 15.14.070 Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4 Added - Adc ption of NFPA 13D Standard by Reference 15.14.080 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope i5.iv.09G Section i-5.1.2 iunended - LSsted and Approved 15.14.100 Section 1-5.1.4 Amended - Testing and Inspection 15.14.110 Section 3-1.1 Amended Valves and Drains 15 16 190 Ccr llnn 7_F amnnAod _ ala,m~a 15.14.130 Section 3-7 Added - Fire Department Connection 15.14.140 Section 4-6 Amended - Location of Sprinklers Standards, adopted by Ordinance No. 326 of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 13R Standard, 1989 Edition, published by the National Fire Protection Association, Inc. Said NFPA 13R Standard shall be referenced as Uniform Building Code Standard 38-3, "Installation of Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems in Apartment Houses, Hotels, Convents and Monasteries Less Than Three Stories in Height" and shall 6e utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprf nkler systems required by Section 3802(h) 2. of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by this Ordinance, except ,.s further amended by SEt Lions iS.14.020 through ;5.14.06"u fail Owioa. Section 15.14.020 Section 1.1 Amended - Sco e. Section 1-1 of said Uniform but ding Co a Standard 38-3 s ere y amen a to read as follows: 9~' Ordinance No. 434 Page 4 Section 1.1 Scope. This standard shall be used in design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems installed in residential occupancies less than 3 stories in height, not withstanding any conflicting story-height referenced herein. Section 15.1.4.030 Section 2-1.3 Amended - Ins ec tion and Tes tin . Section 2-1.3 of said Uniform Buil ing Code Standard 36-3 is hereby amen ed to read as follows: Section 2-1.3(a) Inspection and Testing. All supply piping shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard. A71 systems shall be flow tested in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Standards. (bj Inspection shall be requested by the permittee at stages of construction as outlined below: 1. When underground piping is complete but prior to concealment of any portion thereof and prior to connection to the overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for inspection. 2. When all overhead piping, fittings and riser are installed but prior to concealment of any portion thereof. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized for inspection. 3. When piping has teen concealed and all sprinkler heads, alarm 4..1t/-\ --..t-i, f13,: Sn~ :.6ryr. ra > aou mm~i Loriuy uevi ref Ilu Gal ied and/or connected. ~Tes ti ng Hof associated devices, i.e., alarms, flow and tamper valves and monitoring systems is to be conducted at this time. Section 15.14.040 Section 2-4~2 Amended - Fire Department Connection. Rt least one, 1-1/2 inch or one, 2-1/2 inch fire department connection shall be provided when the sprinkler system has 20 sprinklers or more. Fire department connections shall be located in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. Section 1514.050 Section 2-4.6 Amended - Alarms. Section 2-4.6 of said Uniform Building Code Stan and is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 2-4.6 Alarms. All water flow alarms shall be monitored by an annrnvad rn nr roi cr. ~:.,r ~.. ..-w,...... ~• - ~-~-- ~~~~, ~~,~~~ .,~~,~ na nc ho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. Section 15.14.060 Section 2-6 Amended - Location of S rinklers. Section 2- of said Uniform Bui'Tdl ng ~o a Stan and 38-3 is ereby amen a as follows: too Drdi nonce No. 434 Page 5 Section 2-6 Location of Sprinklers. Sprinklers shall be installed in all areas. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Sprinklers may be omitted from bathrooms not exceeding 55 sq.ft, in area with non-combustible pl um6ing fixtures. 2. Sorinkl ers may be omitted from small clothes closets where the least horizontal dimension does not exceed 3 sq.ft. and the floor area does not exceed 24 sq.ft. and the walls and ceiling are surfaced with material of Class I flame-spread classification, as defined in Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. 3. Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. atanaards aao pted by Ordinance No. 426 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby amended by adoption of NFPA 130 Standard, 1989 Edition published 6y the National Fire Protection Association, inc. Said NFPA 130 Standard shall be referenced as Uniform Building Code Standard 38-4, "Installation of Automatic Fire Spri nkier Systems in Owe7lings and Lodging Houses", and shall be utilized in design and installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems required by Section 3802(1) and (j) of the Uniform Building Code as adopted by this nnal nt nf4 YV/'o nY ie fiinh hun onAnA A.• Cnn.i ..n_ ~[ 1, •l-....-L followi nq. _ _... _..___ ____. _... ....~.,..... .,~~ ,.y~~ .....~.. ~„ Section 15.14.080 Section 1.1 Amended - Scope. Section 1.1 of said UniFOrm Bui ding Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1.1 Scope. This standard shall De used in the design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems ins tat led in dwellings and lodging houses and in certain accessory buildings, not with- standing any references herein to mobilehomes. Section 15.14.090 Section 1-5.1.2 Amended - Listed and A roved Oevi ces. Section 1-5.1.2 of sal Uniform Bui ding Coe Standar 3 - is ei~ amended to read as follows: -tti on i-5.1.2 Li iteG end ennrn yad deyirac iln7v li gt<ri n approved devices and ma terf ats shall be used in automatic fire sprinkler systems. /~ Ordinance No. 434 Page 6 EXCEPTION: Listing may be waived for tanks, pumps and for supp~evices as permitted by Section 3-4.1. Use of unlisted devices shall be approved by the Building Official with the concurrence of the Fire Chief. Section 15.14.100 Section 1-5.1.4 Amended - Testin and lnspec~ion. Section 1-5-f.4 of said Uniform Building Code Standar 3 - s hereby amended to read as follows: Secti nn 1-5.4(a) Inspection and Testing. All systems shall be hydrostatically tested in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard. All systems shall be flow-tested in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. (b) inspections shall be requested by the permittee at stages of construction as outlined below: Nhen underground piping is complete but prior to concealment of any portion thereof and prior to connection to the overhead piping riser. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be fn place, the system flushed and piping pressurized for inspection. When all overhead piping, fittings and riser are installed but prior to concealment of any portion thereof. Hydrostatic test gauge(s) are to be in place and the overhead system pressurized for inspection. 3. Nhen piping has been concealed and all sprinkler heads, alarm hull!<1 Fl nv and famnon oal.we and mnn Hnni nn Anvi nn. lnef.llnd .. ~ ... .__ ...._ .... .. ._. .. a __.. .__ ..._-_-_ and/or connected. Testing of associated devices, ie. alarms, flow and tamper valves and monitoring systems is tc be conducted at this time. Section 15.14.110 Section 3-1.1 Amended - Valves and Drains. Section 3-1.1 of sal Unl orm Bui ding o e Stan and 3 - is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 3-1.1 Valves and Grains. Each System shall have a single control valve arranged to shut off both the domestic and sprinkler systems, and a separate shut-off for the domestic system only. EXCEPTIONS: The sprinkler system pi pt ng may have a separate control valve where supervised by one of the following methods: a. Central station, proprietary or remote station alarm system. ~~ Ordinance No. 434 Page 1 b, Local alarm service that will cause the sounding of an audible signal at a constantly attended point. 2. A separate sfiut-off valve is not required for the domestic water supply in multipurpose piping systems. Section 15.14.120 Section 3-6 Mnended - Alarms. Section 3-6 of said Uniform Bu i~ding Code Standard 38-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 3-6 Alarms, Local waterflow alarm(s) shall be provided on all systems. The waterflow alarm or alarms shall be located on (an) exterior wall(s), or such other location(s) as approved by the Building Official with the concurrence of the Fire Chief, and so located as to be audible throughout the building. Section 15.14.130 Section 3-? Added - Fire De artment Connection. Chapter 3 of saki -Uniform Bui ding Code Standard 38- is hereby amended by addition of Section 3-7 to read as follows: Section 3-7 Fire Department Connection. All R-3 occupancies exceeding 5,000 sq.ft. in floor area shall be provided with an approved fire department connection installed in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District standards. Section 15.14.140 Sectivn 4-6 Amended - Location of S rinklers. Section 4-6 of sa Sd 'u'n {~o rm Oui Ong o e Stan ar 3 - ,s ere y amen a Lo read as follows: ca~F; nn a_x ~nrxfinn of Snri nkl arc. Snri nkl ers shall be installed in all areas. E XLEP TION: 1. Spri nl:l ers may be omitted from bathrooms not exceeding 55 sq,ft. in floor area with non-combustible plumbing fixtures. 2. Sprinklers may be omitted from small closets where the least horizontal dimension does not exceed 3 sq.ft. and the floor area does not exceed 24 sq.ft. and the walls and ceiling are surfaced with materials of Class I flame spread classification as defined to Chapter 42 of the Uniform Building Code. 3. Sprinklers may be omitted from attics, crawl spaces and other concealed spaces that are not used or intended for living purposes or storage. 4. Sprinklers may be omitted from entrance foyers that are not the only means of egress. X03 Ordinance No. 434 Page 8 SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall become fully effective cn January 1, 1991. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within f{fteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valle Oail Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in t.e City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~D ~ ORDINANCE N0. 432 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90-02, AMENDING THE DENSITY PROV IS[ONS OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN TO REQUIRE CHANGES IN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS TO BE APPRO'JED BY CITY COUNCIL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) On September 26, 1990, the Planning Comm ssi on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly nn ti ced public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Victoria Community Plan Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Comm ssi on adopted its Resolution No. 90-124, thereby recommendi rig that the City Council adopt Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 90-02. (ii) On October 11, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and co nrl uded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequi si ti es prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. rho r.ity rnuncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1910, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: (a) That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within Lhe District that is superior .a develoµ,~cr,t otherwise allowable under alternare regglations; and (b) That the Amendment will provide for development within the District fn a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and (c) That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, pu bllc utilities, and public services required by development with the District. /(Js..J Ordinance No. 432 Page 2 SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Victoria Community Plan Amendment 90-02 changing the Victoria Community Plan text, as attached in Exhibit "A". SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to 6e published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daity Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. /06 Ordinance No. 432 Page 3 EXHIBIT "A" The 'Jictoria Community Plan, Page 197, item Number 3, shall be modified to read as follows: 3, In order to provide flexibility in the development of the Victoria Planned Community over the 10-15 year life of the Plan, a maximum of 20 percent variation in the optimum yield may 6e allowed. Any and all variations shall 6e reviewed and approved by the Oe sign Review Committee, Planning Commission, and city Council. The variation in the number of dwelling units within one village . 0~ ORDINANCE N0. 433 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON Gl1, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA CCMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 90-07, AMENDING THE DENSITY PROVISIONS OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN TO REQUIRE CHANGES IN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) On September 26. 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment. Following the conclu- sion of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 90-125, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment No. 90-01. (ii) On October 17, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. (iii) A11 legal prere qui si ti es prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The Citv Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts sett fort~in the Recitals, Part R, of the Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1910, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: (a) That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior re AeYelnrmenl nt hnrwicn ail owa hlw and ar alfarnate raaulatinn5; and (h) That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and (c) That the Amendment will provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development with the District. / (/ U Ordinance No. 433 Page 2 SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 90-01 changing the Victoria Community Plan text, as attached in Exhibit "A". SEf,T ION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to he published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valle Dail Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in t e City of Ontar o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califnrnti a, r0y Ordinance No. 433 Page 3 EXHIBIT ''A" The Terra Vista Community Plan, Page VI-7, Left Column, shall be modified to read as follows: "LM" land use designations can be redesignated to "M" land use. "M" land use designations can be redesignated to "LM" or "MH" land use. "MH" land use designations can be redesignated to "M" or "N" land use. "H" land use designations can be redesignated to "MH" land use. Modifications of this nature shall 6e reviewed and approved by the Uesi gn Review Comni ttee, Planning Comni ssi on, and City Council. The provisions of affordable housing is an important goal of . ~l ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: T0: F':OM: BY: SUBJECT: I. November 7, 1990 City Council and City Manager Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACY 14192 - HIJf pea o t e ann ng ono ss on s c son to require the undergrounding of utilities and the canstructlon of street and storm drainage improvements beyond the protect boundaries fora residential subdivision of 65 single family tots on 19.7 acres of land Located south of 19th Street between Heilman Avenue and Amethyst Street in the Low Residential District - APN 202-061-12, 14, 40 and 44 Staff recamnends that the City Council: 1. Deny the appeal regarding the Hellman Avenue street improvements; 2, Possibly consider reducing the amount of offsite utility undergrounding as requested; 3, Clarify the Mignonette Street reconstruction requirement; and 4, Grant the appeel regarding the Amethyst Street Storm Drain condition sub,{ect to modification of the Hellman Avenue Storm Ora1n condition. II. BACKGROUND On June 27, 1990, the Planning Commission unanlmousiy approved Teniative Tract 14192. As part of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map, condltlons consistent with City Standards and policies ware Sarposwi. Four of these conditions are being appealed by the applicant. These condltlons pertain to: 1. Construction of street improvements on the east side of Hellman Avenue, north and south of the project site; /~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REDORT TR 14192 - NIX DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 7, 1990 PAGE 2 Undergrounding of existing overhead utilities on Hellman Avenue, north and south of the protect site; 3. Reconstruction of Mignonette Street, as determined by a structural report; and 4. Construction o portions of the Amethyst Street Storm Drain south of the protect site. The appeal was originally scheduled for a September 5, 1990, City Council hearing, but was continued at the applicant's request Lo October 3 and then to November 7, 1990. Staff has met with the applicant and reviewed several submittals of additional drainage information. The applicant's summary restatement of the appeal, based upon these subsequent meetings, is attached for your reference, along with the original appeal letter. 1I i. ANALYSIS A. Engineering Condition No. 3 - Hellman Avenue widening: "Construct street improvements on the east side of Hellman Avenue from 19th Street south to meet the eztsttng widened portion north of Monte Ytsta Street. Offsite parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of Lhe adtacent property, with the exception for the two not-a-Dart lots fronting on Hellman Avenue which are surrounded by the protect. The Developer may request reimbursement aggreements to recover the costs of constructing offstte street improvements from future development as it occurs." Hellman Avenue adtacent Lo the protect site currently has a pavement width of 24 feet. This 1s a full 20 feet less than the 44 foot standard roadbed for a collector and 12 feet less than the required width for even a local residential street. The required street improvements along the protect frontage Include a 10 foot widening to 22 feet (measured from the center11ne1 on the east side of Hellman Avenue, which will Increase the total pavement width to 34 feet. The applicant originally protested the reaulrement to extend that same widening 250 feet south of and 300 feet north of the tract boundaries, (refer to £xhtbit "C",) suggraLing instead that he be all awed to transition back to the existing 24 foot width north and south of his tract boundaries. This would have the effect of leaving two short bottlenecks on a relatively busy street, resulting 1n confusion and inconvenience to the general public. /ra CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14192 - HIX ~VELOPMENT NOVEMBER 7, 1990 PAGE 3 The 1987 Traffic Count for Hellman Avenue in this vicinity was 4,200 average daily trips (ADT), well above the 1,500 ADT maximum preferred for local residential streets which are 36 feet wide. The addition of 55 asssumedwwill seuHe111ipanBAvenueitThis lOrpercentlincreasehiin traffic can better be accomsrodated on a 34 foot street section. the applicant is now willing to accept this condition, with reimbursement agreements as specified, 1f he can get relief on condition number 1. D. Engineering Condition No. 1 -Utilities Undergroundtng "The existing overhead utilities (telecoanwnicattons and electrical) on the Dro~ect side of Hellman Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole an the north side of 19th Street to the first pole on the south side of Monte Vista Street prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever retmbursementt agreements toVerecover one-halref uthe CTfy adopted cost for undergroundtng from future development and/or redevelopment as it occurs on the sides otfe the st eel stArl so,a ail fexl s g overhead utilities service lines to houses on both sides of Hellman Avenue shall be placed underground at the same time as the main line." The requi red underground) ng along He11 man Avenue 1 s shorn on Exh161 t "D". The site 1s 990 feet in length. Current policy requires that undergroundtng extend to the first pole offsite or a new pole erected at the Drolect boundary. Usually the undergroundtng 1s extended to the first pole offsite because the cost 1s the same as erecting a new pole at the property line. Therefore, for this project, tha standard length of undergroundtng was considered to be 1181 feet. As shown on the exhibit, additional undergroundtng was required 460 feet south of and 320 north of the Dro~ett boundaries. This additional undergroundtng was required because the street widening (condition number 31 would necessitate relocating the existing poles. tt was felt that the expense of moving the poles far the street widening would be better spent in undergroundtng, where the Developer has an opportunity to be reimbursed from future development. Secondly, 1t Is felt that there will be a reduced unit cost for the additional work due to ecanaap~ of scale. Lastly, the limits were extended across Monte Vista and 19th Streets to clean up an entire block at one time. f /3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14192 - HIx DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER ?, 1990 PAGE 4 The applicant has acknowledged that moving the poles to accomodate the widening of Nell man Avenue will be at his own expense. Staff recommends that the Council consider all input and either retain the condttlon as written, or direct staff to revise the limits to read "from the first pole north of the north protect boundary to the first pole south of the south pro,)ect boundary or to new poles erected at the protect bcundarles". C. Engineering Condition No. 11 - Mignonette Reconstruction: "Reconstruct Mignonette Street as determined by a structural report submf tied to and approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the Final Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first." The development will contribute both additional traffic and drainage to Mignonette Street. This condition requires the Developer to perform a structural analysis to deternlne whether the existing pavement 1s adequate to acconrawdate these items. If Tt 1s adequate, then reconstruction will not be required. D, Engineering Condition No. 5 - Amethyst Street Storm Drain "Construct portions of the City Master Plan Storm Drain tine 2-J in Amethyst Street, Base Line Road, ana along ine aoutnern vacific railroad tracks to meet the City protect at or west of Hellman Avenue, as determined by a final drainage report approved by the City Engineer. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facilities and the Developer shall be eligible far reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City Policy." Subsequent to the original Planning Ccunrlsston approval, the applicant's engineer expanded the drainage study area and provided a lot of new technical information which was not available at Lhe time this condttlon was written. After months of discussion, staff has concluded that the resuits of the most recent stogy are valid. Completion of the Hellman Avenue Storm Drain (requ!red by En9lrteertn9 Condition No. 4) will have the net effect of reducing Hors to the Amethyst system by eltmineting spillover from Nell man and 19th Street, which exceeds the increase in flow resulting from development of tMs site. Staff concurs with the new findings, but feels that the limits of the Nellman Avenue Storm Drain requirement will need to be extended, to assure that all spillover to the AAiethyst system is eliminated as proposed. ley CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 14192 - HIX DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 7, 1990 PAGE 5 Staff is willing to support the deletion of Engineering Condition No. 5, if Engineering Condition No. 4, is modified to read as follows: "(4) Construct Master Plan Storm Drain line 2-I in Hellman Avenue from its existing ,function structure near Monte Vista Street to the first intersection north of 19th Street, including sufficient catch basin capacity to Intercept flows from a 10-year stops. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facility and the Developer shad be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy for all portions of the system that are considered by the City Engineer to be compatible with the ultimate master plan." Since 19th Street 1s a State Highway, it wiil also be necessary to add a condition requiring a Cal trans perniit for any work within the right-of-way for 19th Street. iV. CONr,LUSIDN These Issues were discussed at tfe Planning C~xmalsston hearing and tt was deternlned by the Commission that the coiMttlons were appropriate as written. Staff feels that the additional technical informmtion provided wrr"ntc r~rnnclAeratlnn of iha cin,~, Arain rannl rvronte C•"ff +r111 provtde a Resolution refl acting the Cauncl'" s action on the Consent Calendar of the next City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, SB:BAM:dIw Attachments: Apppeal Letters Exhibit "A` - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Nell man Street Nldening Exhfblt "D' - Hellman Utilitiae Map Exhibit "E" - Stona Drain Requirements Planning Camalssion Staff Report, Resolution and Minutes l ~~ tiLLHN~ ~'lATBLYe. LEM 8. riAMHI$ $[ 1~fALiABY .....n.e..- z..e.wo r.er"PPww en...,........ ie"oo ~oN w"I+nN, rouR." rLeon IRVIN C, ULIiO RNIh D]%13-IO D) T[L[PrGN[ 191~16C.1-IYi ~6L000PICP fl Hl 3C]-e3M July 6, 1990 cc M3923-0OT 737/2aN5 NOTICE OF PROTEST AND APPEAL City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: City Clerk Re: Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-BS dated ,Tune 27, 1990 ("Resolution") approving Tentative Tract No. 14192 (the "Tentative Map"); Hiz Development Coro. Ladies and Gentlemen: On behalf of Hiz Development Corp. ("Hiz•), this letter constitutes a formal protest and appeal of certain conditions tv approval of the Tentative Map set forth in the Resolution. This Notice of Protest and Appeal is being deliv~a red for the purposes of ezhausting the administrative remedies o~' Hi: with respect to the protest and appeal of such conditions. Hiz hereby protests and appeals the conditions numbered (i), (3), (5) and (11) under the section of the Resolution entitled "Engineering Division" (collectively, the "Conditions"). It is the contention of Hiz that the improvements required to be constructed pursuant to the Conditions ("Improvements•) are not appropriate, in that a subdivider is only required to construct or install such improvements "as are necessary for the general use of the lot owners in the ~! LAW OIpIC C3 ALLEN, MATffiNa, LHCH, GAdfHLE Ec MALLORY 4 pAq}ry[pS Mlp INCLII DING ppO p[SSIO NAL CORPOgA}IONS City of Rancho Cucamonga July 6, 1990 Page 2 subdivision and local neighborhood traffic and drainage needs." California Government Code ("CGC") Section 55419(a); La Canada Flintr idce Develooma t r.. } Transoortatro: 166 Ca1.App.3d 206 (1985). It is further the contention of Hiz that the Improvements are not "reasonably related" to the publi r. need or burden that the proposed development creates or to which it contributes. Hollan v. California oa al onan 107 S.Ct. 3191 (1987). The least related and most ezpensive of the Improvements are those described in Condition no. (5), the requirement that Hia construct portions of the City Master Plan Storm Drain line in Amethyst Street, Base Line Road and along the Southern Pacific railroad tracks to meet the City project at or west of Hellman Avenue ("City Project"). Interviews with residents in the vicinity of the Hiz project have indicated that there has never been a significant flooding problem on Amethyst Street. In fact, a study conducted at the request of Hiz indicates that the water flow generated by the Hiz project would be negligible. Such study, prepared by Norris-Repke, Inc., will be forwarded to the City Engineering Division on or about the date of this letter. wh Pthar n. nnf w: ~_ ...: }} w_ _ costs relating to constructionyoffsuch~Improvements,~tthe the Improvements themselves must still satisfy the criteria described in the preceding paragraph. $g@ CGC Sections 66985 and 66486. Therefore, for the legal reasons identified above, the conditions to approval of the Tentative Map set forth in the Resolution under the "Engineering Division" section as conditions number (1), (3), (5) and (11) are hereby protested and appealed. Respec(:ively submitte , Richard E. Stinehart RES:clw cc: Mr. Hob Yoder, General Manager, Hiz Development Corp, ~f 7 i~~ 1 HIX DEVEL0P:1fE1T CORP. October 24, 1990 Attention: City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Planning Commission Resolution No. 90-85 dated June 27, 1990 approving Tentative Tract No. 14192; Hix Development Corp. Ladies and Gentlemen: Our original appeal on the matter referenced above was filed July 6, 1990. Aithougn we are presently in accord with staff on all matters except item II (Engineering Condition /i) below, this letter in no way revokes any of our earlier arguments made _ ~--...L'7 __-.-.: ~.J:.'.G :J:. ~ -.. uii a yon ~ .,i i.iria appeal. The_following summarizes~our'current position on all items under appeal, I. ENGINEERING CONDITION NO. 11 - Mignonette Reconstruction We agree to perform a structural analysis on Mignonette Street and complete modifications to the street as deemed necessary by the approved report. It is our understanding that this condition intends to cover the paved area of the street only and excludes any improvements or modifications to existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk. 1I. ENGINEERING CONDITION NO, 1 - Utilities Undergrounding T.*.=~ conditi c.^., as presently Mated, r&yui[as fire undergrounding of utilities along Hellman Avenue well north and south of our tract boundaries. We continue to object to this condition for the following reasons. Page 1 of 3 //~ 437 South Cataract Avenue • Suits 3 • San Dimes, Cali(onJa 91773 • (714) 599-8461 • FAX (714) 592-5010 First of all this condition conflicts with current policy as outlined by the Engineering Division ("EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY REQUIREMENTS"). This policy specifically states the undergrounding limits as follows: "Ondergroundinq eha11 include the entire project froatago aad eztend to: (a) the first pole off-site from the project boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (b) a aev pole erected at a project bovndnry (across the street for corner properties), or (c) an existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary (except at a corner). The condition proposes an unfair cost burden to the development of our property. it requires an additional 970 feet of undergrounding at an estimated cost of $206,873 (using the city adopted reimbursable cost figure). This is in excess of the undergrounding required by the stated policy which in itself is substantial: 990 feet at a cost of $210,870. We feel the appropriate requirement (for the portions north and south of our project boundary) is to have the utility poles relocated as required to coincide with the proposed street improvements. In comparison, the cast of relocating four pcles and adding two additional poles at our north and south tract boundary would be approximately $24,000. i uc i.i~rrmore cnere are no arguable safety reasons for requiring the additional undergrounding. Relocating the poles will place the lines outside the newly widened Hellman street section. The additional undergrounding does not meet the legal requirements for a condition precedent to approval of a final map. It is not "necessary for the general use of the lot owners in the subdivision and local neighborhood traffic and drainage needs". It in no way benefits our subdivision, and the requirement bears no reasonable relationship to our project. Again, we strongly feel the appropriate requirement would be to have the offsite (the portions north and south of our tract boundary) utility lines relocated overhead on poles, or undergrounded at our option: III. ENGINEERING CONDITION NO. 3 - Hellman Avenue Widening Our engineers have advised us that standard traffic transition lanes installed north and south of our tract boundaries along Hellman Avenue would meet all currently adopted safety stanflards and codes. Page 2 of 3 f/~ Although this is true we agree to design and construct street improvements as presently conditioned, if the undergrounding outside our project boundaries (as previously discussed in item IS above) is eliminated. This additional widening will contribute to the City~s effort to eliminate jogs between improved and unimproved street sections due to intermittent development . we do request reimbursement agreements to recover the costs of constructing offsite street improvements from future development as it occurs, as presently provided in the condition. IV. ENGINEERING CONDITION NO. 5 - Amethyst Street Storm Drain In light of the final report submitted by MORRIS-REPKE, INC. dated October 17, 1990 we feel more strongly than ever that this condition should be eliminated. The report demonstrates that, given the construction of the storm drain line in Hellman Avenue as presently conditioned, the development of our project actually decreases the drainage in Amethyyt. The original condition was drafted under the assumption that the development of our project would increase the drainage in Amethyst. Since this is not the case, and wa actually improve the overall situation, the condition should not be required. once again, thank you for your consideration in these matters. SinAex~ly, r~// .~G~ president ~/cc: Barry xansen, Engineering Division Page 3 of 7 l f F ~~~~~ -, ~T u"T}~ CIT'i' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIIEF.EtIIVG DIVISION TT /N192. N APPEAL Tom; V/CINlTY MAP ••R„ EXIiIDIT: ___ ~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIdEERING DIVISION /ate ~••_ gco' N ~; TT /N/92 APioFAL ~7~;TENTATIVE MAP ~~ ~„ E7cHIBIT: f-J-. L-~~ J- ~ ~ .~ -, _. . .- -~ f -'~~'~i---,, ~.,. " ° Q_ ,~~yy~~ . . roooG'. .rcO... r ~.:'. ~ ~. ~, ~' Il IQj) 'S'~ °t.~ \1 \ o ~ -• . , ~-, ., Q . :u a~ N _~ ~, ~ o ~~,Qti _~ N Q h "'~ 4 ~ ~a N ~ V 3 ~ ~ xh C7 ~ ~ 60 ..Q ~ ~/~ :? ~~~ ~ _ z o a ~ aA V ~ O ,`~ °xi ~~ ~ __ _ _- - of -~,~ ~, . ~~i . ~ k ~: ,.., _, ~~ - :~ ~~;. -- ~: 0 F~ -- .. `.~~~ -. ~~ - ~.~ ~ _f' ~~. ,.~ ,~ ;~ ~ - ~`_~ r _ _~ ,o \~ \ ~' JI ~' J ,~\ `~ ~, < -. ~-~ ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~,1 ,a:. ~~ ~.~~~'I gay N ~ ~ Q ~~ ~ ~, ~ Q ~. ~ T -- ~ f ~l ~ ~ ~ o U N ~ ~ U U z ~ U ~ vy @j ~_~~ LEGEND OF STDRM ~f2Al NS: - - - EXISTING REQUIREII DF PRQJELT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIIEERIITG DIVl,9ION ~ ,~C N 1TF,M: TT Iy192 APPEAL ~,~; STORM DRA/NS „E„ EXHI]3Pf: ui~t~Y ~r tee+ivunv uuun.murvun STAFF REPORT GATE: June 27, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: 3rad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Gra hn, Assistant Planner SU3 JECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14192 - HI% D VEL M N - A residential subdf vision of 65 single family lots on 19.1 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwel if ng units per acre) located south of 19th Street between Heliman and Amethyst Avenues - APN: 202-061-12, 14, 40, and 44. PROJECT 11ND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading Plan, and issuance of a Negative Deciaratio n. 8. Protect Density: 3.30 dwelling units per acre ~~~~ {p.t ii.~ ,-n+~c ar ra fAltornatnl C. Existin land Use and 2onin North - ing a fzmi y residential; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, single family residential; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant, single family residential; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Low- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Single family residential; low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: Protect Site - Lox Re:-td ential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential and Low-Medium Residential Nest - 'Low Residential /~ PLANNING COMMI SSIO iTAFF REPORT TT 14192 - HI% OEV ELOPMENT June 27, 1990 Page 2 S'i to Characteristics: The majority of the project site is vacant, however two existing single family homes are located within its boundaries. One of the structures, the Lord House, is a designated Historical Landmark, the other structures is of no historical significance. Vegetation consists of eucalyptus and palm trees, various fruit and nut bearing trees, a lemon grove, and native grass a M weeds. The site is relatively flat, sloping aDDroxima to ly 3 to 3.5 percent from the northwest to the southeast II. ANAL YSI~• A. General: The applicant is proposing a Tentative Tract Map consisting of a 65 lot subdivision with lots ranging in size from 7,280 square feet to 39,065 square feet with an average lot size of 9,206 square feet (See Exhibit "8"). The tract provides for the connection of three streets that currently dead-end into the project site: Mignonette Street, Kirkwood Avenue, and Layton Street. Because of concerns expressed by adjacent property owners at a Neighborhood Meeting and through a formal petition filed against the Layton Street connection, the applicant submitted an alternate Tentative Tract Map. The petition (See Exhibit "H") was submitted by the residents of Layton Street objecting to the proDOSed extension of La vtAn Streot into rho rrarr The alternate Tentative Tract Map proDOSes a 67 lot subdivision with lots ranging in size from 7,280 square feet to 39,065 square feet with an average lot size of 9,161 square feet (See Exhibit "C"). The al iernate map provides for the connection of Mignonette Street and for Kirkwood Avenue and Layton Street to be retrofitted with reduced cul-de-sac bulbs south of the project site. This issue wilt be further discussed fn Section F. B. Historic Preservation: Two residential structures are located within the boundaries of the project site (See Exhibit "B"). The Lord House, located at 6791 Hellman Avenue, is a designated Historical Landmark and will be preserved. The other structure located at 6898 Amethyst Street is of no his tcriwl significance and will be demo ilShaA. The Historical Preservation Commission has had two separate opportunities to review the Lord House and its immediate surroundings. On May 5, 1988, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed a proDOSaI to designate the Lord House a Historic Landmark. The Historic Preservation Commission aDProv ed the designation recommending adoption by the City lay PLANNING COMM[SSIOh fAFF REPORT tt 14192 - HIX OEV ELOPMENT June 21, 1990 Page 3 Council as both the structure and the site met the criteria of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. On June 15, 1988, the City Council adopted Resolution 88-405 designating the Lord House a Historic Landmark. During the Design Review Process, staff determined that the Lc rd House Historic Lar.Cma rk ..^.e signatidn pe^ta fined to the structure and its immediate surroundings but did not establish a buffering mechanism or determine a specific parcel size around the structure. On March 1, 1990, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed Landmark Alteration Permit 90-02 recommending to the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission adoptTOn of a lot size and tract design around the structure that would not detract from its' historical significance. The tract has been revised to reflect design recommendations of the Historic Preservation Commission and the Design Review Committee. (See Exhibits "B" and "F"). ('.. 6radino and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by both committees and determined, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, to be in conformance with applicable standards and ordinances. D. Desi n Review Committee: On March 8, 1990, the Commtttee Mt Nie we inberger, and Coleman) reviewed the project and recommended aDProvai with the following comments: The Commtttee recommended following the direction of the Historic Preservation Commission to redesign the tract allowing for a greater buffer around the Lard House (See Exhibit "F"). The through street connections to Layton Street and Kirkwood Avenue may possibly be closed, resulting in the additions of one or two additional lots, the final deletion of the through street connections will De determined by the Planning Commission. The recommendation from the Committee to the Planning Commission was to allow for the closure of Kirkwood Avenue and Layton Street. E. Tree Removal Permit 89-67: The applicant submitted a request for the removal of 41 trees of a total 122 trees in conjunction with the development of this tract. Of the total 41 trees, 16 of them cpnflict with street rights-of-way improvements for Hellman Avenue, Amethyst Street, and Street "D". The trees slated for removal consist of Blue Gum and Red Gum Eucalyptus, Cali fo rn to Pep Per, and Avocado trees, as identified in Exhibits "G-1" through "G-5." lay PLANNING COMMISSf O. STAFF REPORT TT 14192 - H1X DEVELOPMENT June 27, 1990 Page 4 Extensive arborist studies were prepared to determine the health and condition of existing trees, and their suitability for preservation in place or through transplanting. Based on the arborist's report, staff is recommending preserva Lion of all trees on the site of the Lord House. The Lord Nouse site contains 73 trees including a variety of palm trees, Mulberry, Birch, Cedar, Elm, and Lemon trees. Eight trees lava Led on the site are suitable to be transplanted ~a nd include two Canary Island Date Palm trees within the Hellman Avenue rights-of-way, one Mexican Fan Palm iocated withfn the Amethyst Street rights-of-way, one Canary Island Date Palm located an Lot 23, three English walru*_ trees located on Lots 9 and 23, and one Leann Scented bum Eucalyptus located on Lot 47. Two alternatives are provided for the Lemon Scented (wm Eucalyptus: either transplant within the project site or preserve-in-place should the alternate tract map be approved. A total of 20 trees located within the tract are exempt from the provisions of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. These trees include Lemon, Avocado, Persimmon, Fig, and Peach trees; and staff recommends their removal. A d eta ll ed listing of each tree is shown on Exhibit "6". Enaineerino Division Comments: ?he project proposes to extend all !hw nF Me rie H nn e~.n n~. uhinh ~1.. ~-_a -a e e ..~....... _ ._ _...__...e -.. ____ .....-. ..-.... ...... into the project boundaries. This was obviously the original intent when the subdivisions where constructed, since the streets were not terminated in standard cul-de-sac bulbs. As is to be expected, residents on all three streets have indicated, that they do not want the streets ex to Med because they fear it will increase traffic. A traffic study by the developer shows that traffic at the east end of Mignonette Street and the south end of Layton Street wou',d actually decrease ff all three are extended, since two means of access will be available to existing residents. Through traffic is expected to be negligible due to indirect routing. In response to the residents' concerns, the developer has provided an alternate plan with Layton Street and Kirkwood Avenue not extended. Mignonette Street currently exceeds the 5D0 fnni maxim in ~Ji _d e_ it will bE 2X t2 ti-d under bath alternatives. They developer prefers the alternative design because ft will yield two additional lots, and will not require the installation of storm drains in Layton Street and Monte Vista Street. lad PLANNING COMM15S10. .TAPE REPORT TT 14192 - HIX DEVELOPMENT ~. June 27, 199C Page 5 Staff recommends the design which extends the streets because: (') the streets were originally designed to be extended, (2) dead-end streets should be terminated with a standard cul-de- sac bulb to allow proper turn around which is not possible for the ez fisting streets, (3) extension of the streets will disperse traffic more evenly to several streets and not unfairly concentrate it on one street, (4) it ailows general traffic and emergency vehicles two means of access, and (5) it allows a reduction in the grade difference between the new homes and the existing homes to the south. There are existing storm drain deficiencies downstream of the proj as site, therefore, the project has been conditioned to install the necessary Master Plan Storm Drains. The applicant argues that development of this site only marginally increases the run-off and therefore the conditio ns are excessive. Staff feels that fnc tea sing run-off to an existing system which cannot contain this flow is unacceptable, a M this requirement to construct Master Plan lines is consistent with City policy. Also, the developer will be eligible for reimbursement of the cost of the Master Plan lines. (Engineering staff will be at the meeting to answer questions of the Planning Commission.) III. ENVi RONMENTAI ASSFSSMFNT• o... r ~s .,,. r.,+.:.r <... ~.. .-- completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part~Ilyofuthe Environmental Checklist and no significant impacts on the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Droject fs consistent with the General Plan and the Deve opment Code. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not 6e detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisance or significant environmental impacts. In addition, the Droposed Site Plan, together with recommeMed Conditions of Approval, i5 in compliance with the applicable provfsions of the Development Lode and City Standards. !. CORRESPONDENCE; This item has been advertised as a Pubiic Hearing in he nland Valiev Daily Bulletin, the property posted, and notices sent En ail property ox:ers withi.^. 300 poet of the project site. Two adjacent residents submitted written apposition to the proposed subdivision, theft comments have been attached (See Exhibit "I"). ~ 3d PLANH IN6 COMMI66I01 .TAPE REPORT TT 14192 - NIX DEVELOPMENT June 27, 1990 Page 6 V?. RECOMMENDATION: Staff has included two Resolutions of pprova~is for a 65 lot subdivision and the other one for a 67 lot subdivision. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 14192, for a 65 lot subdivision, through adoption of one of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Re sp ily fitted, D ra~8 City ann DD: TG:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Ezhibit "D" - Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibit "F" - Ezhibit "G" - Exhibit "H" - Ezhibit "1" - Retnlutlnn ni Resolution of Location Map Tract Map Alternate Tract Map Grading Plan Alternate firading Plan HPC Recommendations Tree Removal permit 89-67 Pet itlon Opposing Street Connection Letters of Opposition Annrnv"1 ins 65 Inv GnAdiviein" Approval for 67 Lot Subdivision ~~~ `r,~r.Trfm7„Tr - --- ~ r ~, ~, _'~=~ ._~~_ ~~~_ L ~~ ~~ `'fn J6 '1®~~EE ~~~E x. .~ n ~' l1~IT-rT-~ r` ~.,...',,,~~ .. ~, CITY OF RAIYCI-~r~ _~UCAMONGA PLANNING. DIVISION / 3~- ~~ '~ C ~Lz___ I e~a~~~ ~ ~W Iii s I L~ r;~ ITEM: TTfLE.f N w n EXHIBIT: ~ SCALE: J ~ ~^_ ~ iI~.. ~, Sri, 1`~ ~ .~ ~~~ 11 t ~l i I 1. ~~ . j!'. ~~J ~ ~` ! .. -} i i! , of ' i !:~ ~s'!~ i i ! ~-i' ' ~.~! ~ ~ . T ' `~T t ! ; ,: ~' i n ~. Z L ~ I ~. . i i, ~. ~' l ~° ~ i f' 1 ~ i .i. ~ ~ d i i ~1 LJ ! ;;« 1 _ .I r~- ii~ I ~ -. i 3 I 1 .II i.1 !`w ~ ~ ~I" 1 ~. i' .. i t ~ . 'ICi; i ~ ; ' i; w--- •~ • i , -v ~~ I t:r.-- ~~, ~ ~~ -- ,~ ~: \ f-1 .'` ,rte/ ~.. ~~ ., iii ~ ~li..~.ll +~ ~~ ~L ~~~ ~, ~ ~- ~ .} - ^~ '=-~ ~_. ..I ', ~ i `\" ,~'j ~~ z C l3~ .~ ~~._. - ,~,: •, - ~-, r --~~i:,,~~~ ~~... ~ > ,, -~ /3~ \~ ~,~~r~ -~ c,~~ i ~ ~.~:; ~, ~~~~~+ F a a .~ :_t t •~~1 t~, _,~ ~/ ~' x w .~ ~~ `~ z E. W ~-'~- ff ,- I~ .: l ~~` ~ _ o ~. I A. o Jc r ' Y s 1 3 oi_ U / 35~ ,,. i i ` , j ~1 i. ~/ ~ i .I~ ~~ ~11~~~ S'; ~`~!~ ~ Lf. i s ~~.. ~~~~, ; ,rte ~. ' I i 1. hr{ --y~I ~ Sal Y~ ; ~ ~~-7 ~4-~-~. I`.~ 3 r,i . ~ ~`y'! t ' ~ ~ ~~ l~.~, ~ r ~~1 ~.'._.}. Ia !` ''I \ ~~ ~ '!+ ' i • ^ ' 1 ~ ., r '- iy~l ~ ~' `'' ~ . N ~ I i i. 4 Jj ~i'~ I~'~ ,I .,~ 13,6 i1 ^l I~ {~ ~ t •.~ ~ '. \ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~+~ ~-,- I• v .~ ~..~ H T _~ . 1 ~' Y ~~~ ~ r !. X Ii U 1~ U 1 i ~ 4• ~'t'Sa~ .~ ,4.1 -..~'" /37 WI on _ ,r ' c/ ~: '~ x ~~ ~~ U Jr- 1- ~/ i .6i 1i~ vi, ~~ 13~ /. \~/_ er, r x I s' U t' =sue. G U • ~ ~ ; :i : ~. ~~~ -~ '~' . :. I i ' ~ t fl~ i _.~ ! - , ~' h ~. ,,,i: g ,, i `, .1 ~ ~ r.Yr ~ I ^ i~~ I l '-tJ u `rl 13~ ~.. . ~i i ''°~ i~,. ~ ~. .. \ ~ z I u ti rr-~ m U ~~ ~ ~ ~ a ,,,.: ,~_ ~ =T_ --P . f ~ , ~ N . . 1, {,. :\; .,jo; ,~ _~~ '` ~= ~.„•r, ~ '~;.j . ::.. ~ e ~ l~ a ~~='=~ '. '-~ _ q ~ ~~ „~. ~ ~?,t ~, ~,~ ~ I .:~ ;: M~ ~ r~'') "~{~ ~"; . ` i . ~ n 41 ^t U ~ y~ u u u u.~ ~~ u ~ u~-~ ~ 1 9 J 3I .,_ ~ 4, .I 'III ~; .I `l ~ ~ ~ ~ I: ~.. r ~, i ~ ~,~.... ,o ,~: ,, _ _ n r ~„n 1'. .~ I'~ I~- ~II. Ir ~~ I' ~'I~ I~ w V~, ~ ,+ ~ II C AI 1 Iw, • 1 1171 ~ } - /i1 ~ °~3 ' x ~. i ~~ 1' ~~ f Y 1 a aIC..i _- _ I~ r uw. rn IT+ I IL-~I l y~ !' 11 r er\ . r: ^". ;' ~.; .J. ~~ ~",~,~ ~, : Y E i= ~i~ I 1 _ _ ~_~ rn u.. ~v~ ~, ~' ~; I )~ ~~ I yl_ ~_ _~,fCF.+1,~~' ~ iw U _f. ~~ ~. ~ l 1 i ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.. . ' 1 A k~.r ~-~,~~~~ -: ~ ~ t ~~1 ~ .?~~ '~ C ~~.`, _., ., _ ~ .. ~~ ~ ~ FT. J ~ `' \ t ~ ~~_ Ni~'~ ~'._ ~ ~ ~: , t ~ ~ ~, 1. ~ . ,~ ~ I~' ~'' ~I ~l~'- ) l ~/~ 1 r _t ~~ La „._~ II ~ ~.. it ; ;} I..r U ~~ E. ` ~ ~`" rr~, ~,,. i ': i~ ~i.i i e c~d~~ x l y ~~{cy] m~p rl k U / ~/3 U u u_ 4--~ u ^,-r w ~~ .'.VM ~~•~T~~I 1: I:'~ I'~VN _. r _ ~ 1. Mi N_ ~ M f ~ j ~i ~i ~ ~~~{III'' ~ `v ef-.i .. s~-'.~ I __~. _ I ~~ ~° '?~',,,i:. `~ r~: •~ - .: e'er-`~I=~; i ' ~ ~' .t~~ `~-. lr` .r' , ~ l a li ~1~'' i la - e u o-. I ~ ~,.c-r r,r I ,,f ~- e ~ ~.~ ,, '. a~..,,a, ~~ ~ ~ .. _ _ lyy z U I rii a U rn u~~~N z ~~ ~~ ~ W U ~~ TENTATLVE TRACT 14192 HELLMAN AND AMETHYST, SOUTH OF 19TH Prepared by Barry Tree Care NUMB -tt -k 1 Yc'k' 2 -)F -3E 3 ~C--h 4 =h' 'k 5 -iC 6 ~F~ 7 ~-~t 8 iE ~t it 9 ~k~c 10 'k k I 1 ~'~" 12 X13 -jt ~t ~; 16 ~-Y~'k 15 -k-k 16 'rt'k -~ 17 ~7c~t 18 'kit 19 ~n '!t'A: 21 22 jc- 23 it- 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 3i 36 37 ~"Y.-1t 3B 39 jt 40 'k-11'lt 41 'k~tiF42 ~titit 43 'Ic ~t'fF44 .~yc-~ 4 5 ER COMMON NAME BLUE GUH BLUE GUM BLUE GUM BLUE GUM BLUE GUM MEXICAN FAN PALM CALIFORNIA PEPPER CALIFORNIA PEPPER AVOCADO CALIFORNIA PEPPER C ALIPORN IA PEPPER CALIFORNIA PEPPER LEMON-SCENTED GUM SLUE GUM BLUE GUM BLUE GUM BLUE CUM SIBERIAN ELM RED GUM Fi io"". uA'1'E PALM RED~GUM CANARY IS. DATE PALM CANARY IS. DATE PALM CANARY IS. DATE PALM CAL ZFORNIA PAN PALM CALIFORNIA FAN PALM CALIFORNIA PAN PALM CANARY IS. DATE PALM CALIFORNIA PAN PALM CAL TPORNIA PAN PALM CANARY I3. DATE PALM CAL IPORNIA PAN PALM CAL IPORNIA PAN PALM CALIFORNIA PAN PALM CALIFORNIA PAN PALM CANARY IS. DATE PALM CANARY IS, DATE PALM PERSIMMON JAPANESE PLUM CANARY IS. DATE PALM LEMDN LEMON LEMDN LEMON LEMDN /~J/ RECOMMENDATIONS PRESERVE IN-PLACE PRESERVE IN-P WCE PRBSERVE IN-PLACE PRESERVE IN-PLACE PRESERVE IN-PLACE PRESBRVE OR TRANSP WINT REMOVE BECAUSB OF HAZARD PRBSERVE OR TRANSPLANT REMOVE BBCAUSE OF POOR HEALTH PRESBRVB IN-PLACE PRESERVE IN-PLACB AFTER PRUNING PRESERVE IN-PLACB PRESERVE IN-P WCE PRBSERVE IN-PLACE AFTER PRUNING RENOVB BECAUSB OP POOR HEALTH REMOVE BECAUSE OF OEATR PRESERVE IN-P WCE AFTER PRUNING REMOVB BECAUSB OF HAZARD PRESERVE OR TRAN CntaaT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESBRVE OR TARN SP LANT PRESERVB OR TRANSP WNT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVB OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVB OR TARN SP LANT PRESERYE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVB IN-PWCE PRBSERVB OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVB OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVE OR TRANSP WNT PRESERVB OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVE OR TRANSP WNT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESBRVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVB OR TRANSP WNT PRESBRVB OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVE OR TAANSPWNT PRBSERVE ONLY, NO TRANSPLANT PRBSERVE OR TAANSP WNT PRESERVE ONLYr NO TRANSP WNT PRESERVE OR TRANSPWNT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVB OR TRANSP WNT PRESBRVB OR TRANSPWNT " i ~,XT' ~ ~ ti rage NUMBER COMMON NAME '/c-)k~ 46 DEMON 47 LEMON 0E LEMON -yc'Jo-)E 49 LEMON 'K'k-'k 50 LEMON ~'~f')E 51 LEMON =Jryc-Yc 52 LEMON -y`~~53 LEMON ~~-K54 LEMON ?k 55 ENGLISH WALNUT ~4?f 56 AVOCADO 57 CANARY IS. DATE PALM ~58 LEMON '/t~ajF59 BLUE GUM ~:'K~k 60 AVOCADO -h~E'j"61 AVOCADO ~C-Yc-~f 62 EDIBLE PIG 63 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 64 CHINESE ELM -~ 65 ENGLISH WALNUT ~c 66 ENGLISH WALNUT ~lrR'~ 67 PEACH it jF 68 AVOC14D0 ~-yC 69 AVOCADO RECOMMENDATIONS PRESERVE ONLY, NO TRANSPLANT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT REMOVE BECAUSE OP POOR HEALTH REMOVE BECAUSE OP POOR HEALTH REMOVE BECAUSE OP DECLINING HEALTH REMOVE EECAUSE OP POOR HEALTH REMOVE EECAUSE OP POOR HEALTH REMOVE BECAUSE OP POOR HEALTH PRESERVE OR TRAM Sp LANT PRESERVE ONLY, NO TRANSPLANT REMOVE EECAUSE OP POOR HEALTH REMOVE EBCAU5E OP POOR REALTH PRESERVE ONLY, NO TRANSPLANT PRESERVE ONLY NO TRANSPLANT PRESERVE ONLY NO TRANSPLANT REMOVE BBCAOSE OF POOR STRUCTORE PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRESERVE OR TRANEP LANT PRESERVE OR TRANSPLANT PRSSBRVE OR TRANSPWNT PRESBRVS ONLY, ND TRANSPLANT Additional trees located oD the Lord Honse sire: 1 7 3 Mulherry 1 Birch 1 Deodar 1 Chinese Elm 1 Eucalyptus 3 8 Lemon Nrha~lsn -" ~- 'fi~' - ~ie~e~vc Ij~, ~I~ce Tf R'v', ; ` ii'~~ I gew1u~e ~t~ ~ ~-~~hk-aF-w~ 1 /1~ ~ Canary Island Date Palm Mexican Fan Palm lrH~vuu2Wt241~*7 F.xH~T ''C'a_ N ~ 4 ~ • • • ~ • ~ '~ 3 ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ ~I • M1 R a. a • ~ f ~ ~ f• • r ` . ~ -• ~ 'js,~ ~. ~'~ ~ 1' lia • •~N• W . Y? {R i ~~ ~ - i F ~W •, w w ~ o~ ! ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 3 . ~f ~ O U • W i ; ry •N •~. . N m ~N~~••~ ~~ •y• • Ww• . N • •W • •u • • F • i • N~• • ~ O• • • ~ N • ~i ~ _ . Nvw~~3n U / / .. N 15.1M13WH 1' {! •~ ~ ip ~~~ o r - +- -. T m • I 7 ti ~JG~ Noyk`t'~ .~------ .• ~ N w O~ ~. ~ / ~~ U a 4 u~ u J.'~~J~ N p .4 ~q y 3K m 1 u • ~ ~W11~h F-i U l 5~ ~'IA RAGOS Ee HELLI\GER .•d~a' nw~~a oL .~w `^ .~.4 Sa] ne. 5_a-5-. au_.__ 5_~ _ 9 va a-..c _ sc_.. ..i-a -~ ~Ea ..,.a1 .~ J.3].. i ] 6~9J6~_ -~ ~cra-92 August 21, 1989 1- C7T, . Mr. Larry McNiel - Chair, Planning Commission City cf Rancho Cucamenga 9320 Baseline Road ~µ. Suite 4C •~ , P. O. BoX 907 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Layton Street - Victoria Street Alignment Dear Mr. McNiel: Attached you will find a petition on behalf of the residents of the 6900 block of Layton Street, of which I am a resident, imploring the Planning Commission and the City Engineering Department to reconsider its plan to align Layton Street with the proposed Victorin Street, a part of HI% Development. On August 7, 1959, I, along with many of my neighbors on the 6900 block of Layton Street, attended the hearing on the HIx Development which was held at the Lions Community Center. Al. ~i,ei lime we wnnr auviauu ~i Li,a ~ii.r'e yiau L., aiiyu Layton Street with Victoria Street and we were shown a map of the proposed development. Zn looking over the proposed map of this area, we noted tT.at the opening of Layton Street to victoria Street was distinctly unnecessary since there were adequate alternate routes out of the development by way of Hellman and Amethyst Strests, and the development would seek to gain very little access to the surrounding neighborhoods by the proposed alignment of Layton Street with Victoria Stzeet. As you can sae from the petition, one of our main concerns in opening this street is the fact that so many children reside in the 14 homes on the 6900 block of Layton Street and we are fearful for their safety should the attest become a through street. Additionally, we are also concerned with the increase of crime in our neighborhood which might well result from making Layton Street a through street to Victoria. we would like to point out, however, that the Nicks Development would gain with an additional lot upon which to build a home for the Victoria Stzeet residents if Layton Street was left in its present status. ~s~ ~1CttI~iT ~~ hen ~lARAGOS $C BELLIYGER .~~e aL ~i~ Mr. Larry McNiel August 21, 1989 Re: Layton Street - Victoria Street Alignment Page 2 As a resident o[ this block and concerned citizen in *_h is matter, 2 have agreed to communicate with you and present this petition on behalf o[ the 16 homes on this block. Should you wish any further information Prom our neighborhood concerning this matter, please Peel Pzee to contact me at my Los Angeles office listed above, or in the alternative, you may leave a message at my home office, area code (714) 944-5302. Thank you for taking the time to consider this matter and we hope that you will give it your immediate attention. Vary truly yours, MARAGOS i BELLINGER/ //(Gl.i~.A. ~ ~~LGYU~ MARTHA E. BELLINGER 69]7 Layton street Rancho Cucamonoa. CA 970 m MEB/kgh LaytonSt.2L Enclosure `~ ° fiPPl-g1 ~S~- ~xttr~iT "~i n ,~, : ~ pP-qZ Original Poor Qua;;:; ?E T. Ci iOY iD PREVENT THE 4LIGNMcNr pc THc 590C BLOCK OF !gV7pN BiREEi Wii~ `/ICTpR?? 8T9EET, q ?RO?GBEO STREET OR THE HIX DEVE_O?MENT ~Ae `ne undersigned resltlents of the 6900 block cf ~aytcn Sthe°e t, City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby respectfully Ceti t~: e? _ne ?lanning Commission of Rancho Cucamonga tc rescind its ., t~ align Layton Street with the proposed Victoria Street, a Dart of HIx Cevelopment. ibis petirion 15 predicated upon the fact tho` eig7porncod safety will he severely jeppardized by making Layton Sireet a throucn street since approximately 25 children under the age of 18 reside c^ the 5900 61ock of Layton Street and would be s..~cject to the dangers of increased traffic, which weuld naturally occur from opening the street. gdtlitionally, little a00ears to de gained by opening Layton Street to the planned `/ic *_cria Street location since residents of victoria Street will nave access to Hellman Avenue and gmethyst Street by more convenient routes out of the HIx Development. Third, most of the current residents of the 6900 block cf ~_ayton Street have resitled on this block since the inception of the 'ensen Tract. During that period of time, not one burglary er serious crime has occurred on the street and we feel this i5 attr iduteb le to the fact the block dead ends. we are gravely concerned that opening up Layton Street will increase the crime to our block. While the City appears t0 have Some bonCein that it i5 ur~sa'e to nave emergency venicles and trash disposal trucks bacaind down the street due to its dead end, during the t2-year existe ice of the street noC one injury has occurred as a result ^f `nis feature, although numerous children have resitled on the black. Finally, the HIX tleveiopment would benefit by keeping the 5900 block of Layton Street closed since it would gain an adCitional building lot for its development. \r`` n 'C"a~-n.Q0. Q ~CrX~- ~acl~"1 ~Hy}'orJ $~'. ----- aporess • • '1~.~s...:. ,,,~,: i _ ~`s~<,.t~-rte E 9uq ?~ :/. _ ~i signature aC~ress '. v slgnature a dress /53 ~Xtn~IT'' h~" Original Poor Quality signature add ess ~'Yi\ . - ~•w._ C-l~t..~ ~ l~c~sY.~r.J.A.: is `l b y ~a-~-'r` ~~ signature ~~- aCtlres i Y signature adtlress J! r ~n'! f r/y'. n ~. 2 signaicre address i signs ~ e adtlress •~j ~J~~:t~ ~C.1i2'. 1~ ~2si~/~^, G~/7 ~/7.bf~~rt.~ .jf, signature 7 ,/ adtlrASs > ~-' -~;~~ar era .,..., signature ~-- atl ss signature ~ a dreg, ~' v' ~ :, signatut- e ~ addr s '~ /450 .A. iy~~iw y~ /~s~gnature ad6Yess OFTED: LIdLS~(La~ ~I~~C/~9 J Original Poor Quality -/7GISGCG ~i~/ v (Cr<-~it~ /~/IG<-cC'i- /js~; C%`C c~iL'ff/lilYl~il'~ cwt' . .~ 9, i9r~ -firCEiVcU- cmoF rwra~pcuCpMOnc w~hnr- rn~so• ~' .-;~:~~,: ~, ~ 199 ~,: ~' ~ ,mac<<.,~~ ~;-z~~,~/ ~ /y ~`~..~f~.f 1~~~-~~~~ J L ~: /, ~ /.,7 ;: i'i ~i. =~• '-</ /</ _/ l•<.t-• .stit 4/ i l< C ://it lY C ~• //:e C~- zC L~.~:" 7~GG~/~~~~v ~,;`~~ ~ ~~<i.:~ = Clip %~ L `~ :.S~G/~~ ~:' ~ LU/~ s' ,c/fC`7'LJ L'G'I/~/i~fi%/L C//' ~, ~..h~tif~`C~ ~7")~l~c~~//7/li~t~/.7~J/I~, Gf~iJ ~fif(~i /I7ll~/~C ~t-2~ ~ ~~~~(~i 7iG3~~^~~dSi ~~ n ~v`~ ~!'ialn8~ Po^r Quality ~~~~ -~~~li~~~7~t/J,, l~2(u~~~~G~J ~o //_~~. ~~`G~-4~~~lC,"~~ v ~:Gcl % is ~ /,,~r~/1~:~ ~.~~ ~~/~~~~ !' ~~~~ lug ~~ ~ ~ /l~ ,,±. llz~ ~ ~~7i r~r~'~ii .~. /~r~ ~c~.~ ~/ ~~// /- cl ~ ~-3' ~G~yii Vic' ~~ ~'n ~!~ ~5 TiZEI-.3~' /)~ Z~rC~ t~ L ~S~~~tKS~ ~_, _.._L-~-'_.~- ~.~ ~~~!',- 1/, .rse `-'f/~e~/ Lei ~2~!i~~~C~.-~~ ~Zi_ ~~ ~ /~i ~~,~`~%m-~ ~i lair crG ~i£l ~~/ ~~~~~ /~S /mar l'Y~ ~~L'~n~~~ ~~~~, _ i ~2u~1~ ~~,~;~ ? f~~~ ..r n ~ original Poor Quality Cr~~riy~ Guei ~~ ~/~~t~i~ Gri.~ /~lGr~,~~' z~ ,,~~,, ,rte//~.~i~rrr~ J ~ ~ .~ ..mac ~ r~J~~ ~~Yi"i/%~GG~J~f /'(l `~% ~~tiG,L~~YI.~i j7l~i .~(i?7•ff~ ~;~~• ~~: • /~/~/t ~/iil"i / !art' %i ~ ~/ f ~ 7 z, a err ° ~ ,. ~~~yy-- yy r~~ PRANK PENN'S MAGIC LAMP INN 9"r Poc•~~ ~. ~.= _... ^~a, Ca'~ :. 9'730 ~•cre i v32~3687 3ancho ^icamonga ?lanning ^nmmiss:.cn P ^ 3~x 'C7 San oho .,y am-~n,a ~a ..'une 9 1990 7~~.- .o whom it may concern. de 'Dave li ved _^ ~;1l campnga since ept, to5d, de do not need any more congestion in our nei3hbor hood. ds every one well know we are supposed to be rear our limit on water, streets, an3 highways, .e are very much cpposed to the adflition of 65 homes of this project. They put in nev lawns, trees, and said in the paper several weeks ago there were 9000 new homes under constnyction, That mesns rtnrs achoo is to be built, taxes are x high now some people that have lived here many years are having.to sell and move else where, as I see it we finish the homes that are started all over hLCamonga, 3tiwanda, it is just too many people after 4 `^1 You an not move at the si goals for the traffic Docked up. I have seen it on 5ase!ine backed up almost W rarnelian. Same an Foothill from 7lneyard almost to the [amp, n'.ewnuld be at the meeting, 'nut my hueDand hoe had dadiation for several months, ani is ,~ C/ r ;~,~''~ ,' / ~~ ~~. ~,~, ~~ I /t.> `" C .S`'~/~ ~ Ic ~~ ~~~- ~ ~ ~-~, /5~ a ~~ ~ „ 1 A_ RESOLUTION N0. 90-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 14192, A,R ESIDENTI AL SUBDIVISION OF 65 SINGLE FIW ILY LOTS ON 19.7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 19TH STREET BETH EEN HELLMAN AVENUE ANO AMETHYST AVENUE IN 7HE LON RESIDENTIAL OISTR ICT !2-4 DN EL LIkG UNITS PER AL RE1 AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT TN ER EOF - APN; 202-061 -1Z, 14, 40 AND 44. A. Recitals. (i1 His Development has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Mao No, 1a 192 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." !ii) On the 27th of June 1990 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. l iii) All legal prerequ is i*.es prior to the adop Lion of this Resolution have occurred. 3, Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Ca mmis sia r. hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Re solution are true and correct. ? Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 'c7, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with puD 11c testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located south of l9th Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues at the termination of Mignonette Street, Kirkroad Avenue and Layton Street with a street frontage of 746 feet along H~llmen Avenue and 330 feet along Amethyst Avenue; and fhl The lord Hou SE. located at 8797 Hal iman Ay eni~o is d Designated Historic Landmark and will be preserved; and !c) The property to the north contains sfngle faintly homes, to the east are single family homes and vacant property, to the south is vacant property and single family homes, and to the west are sfngle family homes. /59 PLgNN GNG COMMISSION RE SO UJ TiON N0. 9u-3i 7T 14192 - HIX OEY Et 'ENT June 27, 1990 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-re fe nenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and proposed; and c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development (dl The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative ire ct wilt not conflict with any easement acquired by the pu611c at large, now of rei.o rd, for access th rough or use of the Droper*_y w!th ir. the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby fiMS and certifies that the projtR;t has been reviewed and consfdercd •in comolta nce with the Ca ti in.":, c.,,.?ro-,-;;; ~~! warty ha of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Dee la radon. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, c, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application 5ubjttit to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated heroin by this reference. Pla rtn ina Division: (1) "Prior to the recordation of the final map Or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Hello-Roos Community Facilities District pertaining to the project <14e t~{ rn ;Ae jn +- p. Y onjunt t~..n with the Chaffey Unified School District for the construction and maintenance of necessary schoai facilities. However, if the school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, fn the alternatfve, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of Such existing district prior Lo the recordation of the final may or the issuance of building /!" `' 7LANNIAG COMMISSION RF50 LU TION NO. 90-85 TT 14192 - R1X DE VEL ENT June 27, 1990 Page 3 permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the Cha ffey Unified School District has not formed a Mello -Rdos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of aDDroval of the project and prior to the reCO rda tfon of the final map or issuance of building permits for said projea, this condition shall be dee4ed null and void." (2) iree Removal Permit 99-67 for the removal of 41 trees whose location conflicts with rights-of-way and other site improvements is approved as follows: a) All trees located on the site of the Lord House shall be preserved in place; and b} Trees N0. 6, 13, 7.3, 24, 40, 55, 65 and 66 shall be preserved by transplanting elsewhere within the pro je,:t site; and c) Trees No. 18 and 57 shall be removed and replaced with the largest rw rsery grown stock available, as determined by the City Planner; and d) Trees No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, and 59 shall be removed and replaced with Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum), minimum 15-gallon size; and e) Ine IOG aiian et° ali ir'eea w yr~;~; ,c.'._~I; .YI:::r ,; locations of transplanted trees, and locations of ~•epiacement trees shall be shown on the detailed i.ardscape Plans subject to City Planner review and tpprovat prior to the issuance of any permits; and f) the applicant shall follow all of the arborfst's recommendations regarding preservation or transplanting measures; aM 9) Tlo se trees reQ Ui red to be preserved in place shall be p°o tee led to accordance wf th Municipal Code Sa;tion 1!1.08.110 (See Condition /3). (3) Care shall exercised by all inllviduals, developers and contractors working near preserved trees so that no damage occurs to such trees. All construction shall preserve and protect the health of trees to remain, relocated trees, and new trees Dlanted to replace those removed in accordance with the following meawres: a) A1" trees to be saved shall be enclosed by an ?!ANN:NG COMMISSION RE 50!'J T:0.1 N0. 9UdE 77 14192 - HIX DEYEL 'ENT June 27, 1990 Page 4 appropriate construction barrier, such a5 chain link fence or other means acceptable to the City Planner, . prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit and prior to commencement of work. Fences are to remain in place during all phases of construction and may not be removed without the written consent of the City Planner until construction is complete; and b) No substantial disruption or removal of the strut to ral or absorptive roots of any tree shall be performed; and cl, No fill material shall 6e placed within three feet from the outer trunk circumference of any tree; and d) No fill materials shall be placed within the drip line of any tree in excess of eighteen inches in depth. This is a guideline and is sub,iect to modification to meet the needs of iM iv ldual tree species as determined by an arb or ist ar la ndxape architect; and e) No substantial aonpaction of the soil within the drip line of any tree shall be undertaken; and f) No construction, including structures and wails, that disrupts the root system shall be permftted. As a guideline, no cutting of roots should occur within a Ait tarry on ual 1n t6 wo >nd n n_•>ts ._,,,,,.. .,, ,, . ._i. diameter, as meaty red at ground level. 0.:Lual setback may vary to meet the needs of individual tree spe,:ies as determined by an arborist or landscape architect. where some root removal is necessary, the tree crown may require thinning to prevent wind damage; and g) The City Planner may impose such additional measures determined necessary to preserve and prote,:t the health of trees to remain, relocated trees, and new trees planted to replace those removed. (4) The Lord Rouse end its immediate surroundings are a designated Historical Larxlmark. Any alteration, removal, relocation, or reconstruction requires review and aooroval ""-y the Ri; t:.r is "rE Se rvat iafi wmTt its ion and Ciiy i.ou n,:ii. Plana for the construction of a new garage or, the Lord House site shall be submitted far review and epproval by the Design Review Commtttee and Historic Preservation Commission prior to the issuance of any permits for the demolition of exfstfng barns or garages or the construction of a new garage. In addition, compliance with all /6~ PLANNING COMMISSION RE SO LJ T[ON N0. 90-~5 TT 14192 - HIX DEVEL' SNT .lu ne 27, 1990 Page 5 Conditions of Approval for Landmark Alteration Permit 90-02 is required. !6) The design of all perimeter wa 115 shall be Shown on the Landscape Plan subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the is 5ua rite of building permits. (6) Walls placed at the rear of the not-a-part oa reels fron,r iqg Heilman Avenue, adjacent to Street "L", shall be contt rut tad of decorative block subject to City Planner review and approval prior Co the is suarx:e of building permits. The walls shall be designed with gated access from Street "C" to the rear of the lots. Ena ineer ing Division: (1) The existing overhead utilities (teletommun Ica [Sons and el ec tr ital) on the project side of Hal iman Avenue shall be and erg rou nded from the first pole on the north side of 19 to Street to the first pole on the south side of Mon V_ Vista S[reet prior to public lop rovement accepts me or occupancy, whichever octu rs first. The Developer may request reimbursement agreements to recover one-half the City adopted cost for a Mergrou nd ing from future development and/or redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street and offs ite on the same side of the street. Also, all ezistfng overhead utilities service lines to houses on both cldn of wail... e.._.cc .,y.ll ~~ Pl,~eu underground at the same time as the main line. (2) An fn-Iteu fee as contr ibut ton to the future and ergrou rzi ing of the existing overhead utilities (telecomaunitations and elettrteal) on the opposite side of Amethyst Street shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Map. The fee Shalt be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. (3) Construct street improvements o,n the east side of Hellman Avenue from 19th Street south to meet the existing widened portion north of Monte Vista Street. Of fsf to parkway landscaping may De deferred until development of the adjacent property, with the exception for the two not-a- aart lot<_ fronL'ng __ Hellman Avenue which are surrounded by the project. The Developer may request reimbursement agreements to recover the costs of constwcting offsite street improvements from future development as it ocwrs. (4) Construct Master Plan Storm Oratn line 2-I in Hellman Avenue from its existing junction structure near Monte Vista Street to the line wh ith drains the l9 th Street at / ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION v°SO LU^ ON N0. 90-d5 TT 14192 - NIX DEYEL EN7 June 27, 1990 Page 6 Hellman Avenue in to rset do n. Standard drainage fees for the site s".all be credited to the cost of the facility and the~0evelo per shall he eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy. (5? Lo nstruct portions of the City Ma Ster Plan S[orm Ora in line ?-J in Amethyst Street, Base Line Raad, and along the Southern Pacific railroad tracks to "ne*_ the City project at or west of Hel liren Avenue, as determined by a final drainage report approved 6y the City Engineer. Standard drainage fees for the site shall be credited to the cost of the facilities and the Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of costs in excess of the fees in accordance with City policy. l51 The public street improvements on Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street shall be constructed prior to the issuance of building permits. (7) Streets intersecting Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street snail not have cross gutters, as storm drains are available. (A) If a retaining fall is proposed along Amethyst Street, it shall be located outside the street right-of-way. (gl Private drainage easements sh al' 6e shown on the Final Map .7• .•.. - ..a ldcyc ios rill lea. ine se dYe ezp ax: red LO occur on~LO is 1-), 24, 25, 34-45. 48, 49, 51, and 54, per the Conceptual Grading Plan. (10) Landscaping within the lines-of-sight for ir.tersec dons with Hel lmart Avenue a M Amethyst; Street Shall be approved 6y the City Traffi:. Engineer. Ail local intersections shall have their noticeability ingroved, usually Dy moving the two closest trees on each side behind the sidewalk. Siz foo4 wide street tree easements shall be Dravided behind the Sidewalk for all corner lots, to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. 111) Reconstruct Mignonette Street as determined by a structural report suhmitteA LD and approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of the final Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. f12) Construct local storm drains in Monte Vista and Layton Streets as determined by the Final Drainage Study. 6. The Secretary to this Comatsslon shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ley ~L ANNING COMMISSION P'~O LU TI ON N0. 90-BS TT 14192 - HIX OEVEL, ANT June 27, 1990 Page 1 APPR DYED PND ADOPTED THIS 27TH OAY Of JUNE 1990. PLANNING COM SION OF THE/I -CSI TY OF RANCHO CUC AMO NGA Larry Niel, C rman ATTEST:,/ ,// Bra u e ,Sec re v I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commis sicn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ra nc ha Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June ]990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, NCNIEL MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, WEINRERGER ~~ gE ?V`s`s ~; c: ~ icc~~5 Y~~o ~'~_ 'ica8 ~z:-x/xofre~ Y,,, ~, ~.,3LL5°a F F5~~~3~~7fr~ bfrVe-a_~~.e S~___~-oo-'„ ~~~~ "fr'fr_°~fr t~~=va:°~Bz ~I ~s a ~ --r 9 M a i e €e Q~i5F :e fr: ~< <a: .o ~fr~~ ~ u-°r sF~V '~e aEax„ :gi ~yx ~~.: .x9.- F5~ ~gx_~B g'f ~BE ~pfr `; s~=s~ ~~~3 ~~9 Svg?E FIBS ,•- ~Y N `$•Ya ~Y~x -bp „P~ ~t °.F ~S Qw„8~fr -. ~z~lu` , uF MTV ~aoa. :fis" "<.sFs"`r~i YS 9i ~~8n x ~- ~: V \I ~ ~I ~~ a ~~ e ~ ~~xsgic° r ° ~ e I=~~~~as~ eg. ~ r. k=~~xxo ~~e z ~i Vii.-s<~.,;a _ 4 =zg a, ds ~a~y~-s~ `sa _ cs~l~Ye~~ s€a ~ iF iia Y-~.d f 3~~ =~a i e~~ ? r I ~: i L2e3i~s~ S ~ "e; ~ s d~ [j5i~ ~i~ s 5 ixf s =x sis ~-3s j[ s3a•f~~ ~~ F ~3i ~ ~ i ~~ F~t~~~?y~ ~: ~I _ _ ~ €! ~ \I ~I ~I I \I ~ d ~ LAS= 08 ~k T_AS2F y tCk:.k° key ,e kT k 3 a ~€ ~ e CJ °~ • l w oY S'~x c°g5~~` ~~ ~ ~ „¢~~J ~~ 2 ° k r~~ ~s ° e ~a.xy~~c3 ~a. „'$ a " a 's s a~ , _ - ~ x -'' - .!'~ _~~ ^c~k Ask `~x ;,:Sg .k ~_' ~"~• ,. n °.' Y=~y .~~ ~ ~~; ~_ _ _ fi }J V 'io 3 =ie a=ifi~e~t ' S ~ ye es _a .:; _x e ~_ a^E:9r Ee :~ ;°r '-= ,QT t fi~ ~"Qe a Y _ 4y a ;~^y_ge x' 5 .=Y 3 _E~ ~ ~ ~ d gE L .. ~_ a FE ~ ~ e. ° ~ SYY•gg_ ~~ C`• a ^~ y~fr `~e ~~ o'- g ~~ SES- ~+" gg ~i : F Se ° .. ~ <7svY 8 ~AO~~ E JiS :»YTf :~ ~ ~~' ~I W~~ ` ~ p 4 8 ~ @ S i ~~ . . °j 4 I N~ \ I 3 Y . 'y e~~ ~< xas { r ka"s <- 3~$ §$~ ~r ° "~F~=a~i- -"sue 8a?'~f~ ~~s` Y~ Fib ~~i ill i~ ~'~~`Fs~' r~~e;~ arF~~i a' r a:~ gE1 ~as gY i~~~g:g~? 2i~3ss i~irF# g~z 2a °:a ==ii s~ c °s~,iTi~b ;a~rr e~~saE ?_ as ~~~ lira ~api ~•~ ~ i„L1is~=T~ FS~"6 }xs~~a <~fio .d2 .-.a .Yx~ Msi ":z "Sii~~iir_ 1~~;~s i~~sl~ a _ <~ ^~ ~~ .I ~I I I I ~I ~~ 7 xs ° x sx :~ ox" " ~ ~gi ~ =a€ e= ~xxes°;x-~s :€x;a xe a~5a 3`'s=R Yes ~~ rax - :-"a~^'ssx: °sx ^i ~:ae -- ie_ »i;, ^ry ° _gx`sx~g:xgfr ae~~Y rP =:5 ~~ ~~ MI ni ~I \I ~l ~~I ~ -=~ :" a~= -.9 "°_> ?9 "~z= ~~s fit a$ _ :e:= - ~ Y °' ^ x _° '~;~e- "5 ~~F-y* .".a ~~=~ ,° ~~gs °Fg~ ~=~' SYE= BC~T z_ x~ a _ x~ar -. „: $ " '? aY d ~ $'a '~ r~ i `= e~ ''~ 3g$y ~~ °9 ~ g4 61t- ~~ ~ 35 & `_ •• ^ ~~ ~ ~ 5 , , s6 := g z"s ~ ; ~' iY' ~ ~~ ~ E • 4 _tL '^~ ~ o xd i $f as ~~ ~i ~ ~ F;Y ~ 4 E~ Y ~ :~Y }~L 3 ~~ ~~Y~: ::. ~C~ :;, .F ga43: €r €__ ~~ z3 d~ ~e x~ xs i ig Yet psi rer~s g~' Y~~kSB x 4 3s"j e~Ylae ~aa5 -raga -n, g;~iEgi a r; i=-~3d rt5~ ~j~°~~~ Lim ~_~bxt- g~.~ i$SL~F~ ;a, Y?~" 3r"='~~x ~~~~ ~exr3~~ EyD r. .Ycer~ ~.l l~ 'Y Sg t9~ ~~~ ~i FeL _i ~i ~i a ~I ~i -~' _ : _ x~~ a ~ 5'~; ~'~s"a _5„ a °- se ¢ ~ 's~ 59E =a!`~ 5~ 5" 1"8SZ L$~'S is Six - ~ "~"'°Y € '-~ ~~'S S~~y~ C~II gF 8 9q _ ~9 y 8" "` yy $$ A ^~ ev S' 'oY~ ~Ee Eg r ~ " .~ S~~Y„~z SS~iF ~ EY: Y ~sz: esss" ;rCaF 'e ~ ~ ~~W~ isaaxx ils~o ~ ~ &c's ~I ~i `J ~~ y ' ~ ~I ml y ~ ~I ~_ _ ^ Y F ga *E 5239 ~i 'YS ~ ""Y fi2g ~3aa ~ ~Yx y"s; ~ xsra ~a g~a i $~ "~: =kg~ _ a ~ ~ cx~ ~ €~ea 9n sg: Y Y~ s="s vas= ~ € .is E33 r e ~~ _~ ZYr = ~~ s'„ ;~aa psi ~yD s .~ ~ § a ~ xY~y ~ 5i~ r~Yy j =a~g ~1 -fir x a" '~fe rs~~ ~ ~ r 8^~ ~sgs ~ ~~a• ~f ;~- ~` yi~ ~sxe ~c3s i € ~' ~~s ii~~ 3 s53~c i~ F dj Ys fix: i~, ~ 's Y" - ~~ fs = er rY szs s ~F } ~ Y^' ~ ~ ~ g r; ~ ~si ' pis Y n~as i_E~_ ~ . ;is is~~ ' is-'_ !rr €ssp y,. Y.a ,~`s ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ^~ el~~ v ~~ /P ~ u ~;5 =peas" 3 ,ae5 ~ k ~ S9 8 r ~Y _k fr _` =E oy=` '=Y _°~: Yr c`v 2~~~9E2 = ~ d€ a ~ ~3 e n a ~y° i .a S - ~~ ~fi ,F M~ B' =1 sg 3°E k3 ~! ~! 7. -= i EE Y3 _F gg .3 ~~ ~~ ~~ i~ s a~ € g gS ,~ WE~ WE~ ~o a ~ I I ~I ~ s I ye II '' ~ a ~ I I -'.ca E I °8 i I I ~ I 3 _ t :&.. 'I ~I II S ., I - ~eB Fi ~ I S I :~ I S I ° ~ V I b B ~ g 8 " ' I I % " ^S 2`lj` e¢ ~ li g: $Efio as I _ 53 D .. 8 ~~ 2 Y .ce :` 3 ~; g Y~S of b ~ g;~" ~a _ ~ ; X ~ Ir ~ ~ 53 ~ d ^I \I \I of \I ~ e~ \I \ Y S.Y [a!' -~ Y fiyi3 E SE .afi _ fifi`" 3y~ 5 ~~~~ 9g~ € _°~Y Y S~ns =S. ~ii E3~: ;~ `t;! dFx~ r~ c"as C yid ~~ 5~y ~; 3 i _% ' YV s,$ S~ " 9~i~ ~~ _~ S, ~3~~ E~ ~YY Vii'. to :5 ! PSF~ :~y^, 535 g= ~€ ~ E aY 1'E ~+l FE a•8 €i E ~ ~ iEt i_ 5_ $5 > " Y 9~ E3e= " 3 ;~ 5 ~ EYS~ e_~~ ~3E~3 E i Y `Y= Yet 5:~g5 L `~ Z ~~f ~:a- 554Ci 5o a~ S~Yj~ E~~aA ~S FS 7 " SE let 3 ;7 i4 ~ ."SY~ ~~S :JY 3E li s$ ~~ s atlas ~r?s at_t '~I '~~I ~ J ~y y ~I ~~I \I ~ / 7d __. .a~ ~ x x°. - s °~ar; w ~ a' ~ S - ~~~ ~~ 5~ i ~, a P~ ` = g~ ~ I ~ E` ~ r ` 6 .;~° fa g - fr ~.. ?~B ~ ea 1 Sa 5 ~6 ~ ~3 Pg ~. o.y ~ 5 e, „Y~ r ~i ml ai \ \j ~~ -~ ~ ~ e ~~ ~ ^~ ` Y E Sg - , ... _~ E ~ '° ~ z '' = ` Sx ~~ "gfi F °' 8~ ,: •°Y ° :~ 3 .~ F :~ `t: _.~ S SE -'6~, ~. ~s E ~~ ~~ zas "ss e ;g~ ~ ae ~~ ~ ~ t .dY ~f EY~ ~f' 6 \I w N y ry \I a e Yi \i ~i i ~~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ F :s ^n~ :a ~~ ~ ~Q$ &S3~e g5 y~~ T~=~ 3~=s3 ge LJt ~~~ ~3~i~ ~tl ~ T° w~ ~ ~~ a[s i~^~s [f~Z A rt~.Y saw ~~yy 3;=in ~ .~ ~ ~ sst ~ ~ ~ W3-~~ y o= /7/ ;~~ <k- o= x~ se it =~ ~-- sea i ~~ e e ~~~ ;~ ~e ~<a i °'_ ~x~ :i des e ~_~ .I max .<[ g " E ~- ... _ '~Ybk y 8 ~ __ _^ S x ~ x ~• ay 3~~n E•: eFg ~ ~ 9 g5[ 3~~ ~; ;£ lea' I •`-` -~» tl ~y i pE: ~E. 3 .~ a~~g A l4 ~5 a S- "^f 5_ 'Y x' x-e~C ~~`r a s'as ~ aY "f -3s •~" is a~ xsax 3~~ 9 nos 3 °a is s~` i~~ ~$ x" ~_3 Ix'-" i Lax. $ iE ~ _- iir § - 'g .. ~ ,: ~s i~ ~ ~ fee =~a 8 " $ig ~ saxa }a =tr>` Y;, - _~ ~ sr~ ~za it S£ "?~~ ate- ;' :E=+" -` ~ .. ji E-~ ~ £1 ~f S= s~ Fpe; Iax~~ e} :t i d~ ie 4~ ~'t ix~ =_. ' e_iy bas= /? ~s~€ ~= i ~~ ;~ giFa =;x x~'~ 'k F= i~~s isc Fd'a ~! ~I `~I \I ~I\I ~I ~ ~I \I ~i I ~I ~ 7~- res td en tial subd iviston of 65 single family lots on 19,i acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located south of 19th Street between Hellman and Amethyst Avenues - APR: 202-061 -12, 14, 40, and 44, Tom Gra hn, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Melcher asked if staff had reviewed a design of the subdivision witn cul-de-sacs bulbs within the new tract. Ba rrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the concept was considered for Kirkwood and Layton, but they would have been in excess of 600 feet with the addition of the bulbs, which would violate Li ty code and there would be a substantial portion of property in the middle between the two streets that he was not sure could be accessed. Commissioner Melcher stated he did not see the relationship of the design of the Lract around the Lord House. Mr. Gra hn responded that the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission did not specify a specific parcel size area. Ne said the original proposal included a street immediately to the east of the house, with the distance between the street and the house not meeting minimum setback requirements. He said the current proposed tract design was determined adequate. Chairman McNiei opened the public hearing. Ernest Hix, President, Hix Development. 437 Snurh f.a r, ra.r e,..,.,..., o,:._ na nc no Cucamonga, San Oimas, stated that during the master planning phase they submitted nine different configurations and the Historical Preservation Commission finally approved the current plan. He presented a letter detailing their concerns with the proposed Resolution. He stated they had submitted grading plans for bu lbed streets with drainage running directly to Amethyst without the need to drain through an ex isti rig residential area and without the need to install storm drains in Layton Street and Monte Vista Street. He said they were opposed to lowering the lots on the south side as shown on Exhibit D, as it would only lower nine lots from .4 to 2.3 feet, which he felt was negligible. He stated 'hat th efr traffic study indicated there would be a 17 pert enC increase fn daily traffic for Layton and a 128 percent increase for Kirkwood if the streets were connected through. He said the traffic study showed there would De negligible Impact upon the traffic in therr developments whether or not the streets were connected. He stated they did not wish to COM e[t Lhn streets. Mr. HiX objected to the req~~;remen. to complete Lie Ha ster Pian storm drain and said that their studies indicated their tract would only add 16.6 cubic feet of water per second, which would translate into .03 inch of water added to Amethyst. He presented a chart depicting a total cost of over E3 million to complete all the improvements requested by the City. He requested that transition lanes be allowed rather than widening the street beyond their protect boundaries. He objected to the retonitructian of Planning Commission Minutes -12- June 27, 1990 /73 Mignonette Street. He felt that the City could not legally require them to underground the utilities north and south of their property. He objected to the requirement that all street work on Hellman and Amethyst be complete prior to the issuance of building permits and said they wish to be able to build model homes at the same time they are doing the s*.reet work. He said the street work would be done prior to the Showing of the models. He said no one had explained why the additional requirements were needed and if it is legal to require them. Martha Bellinger, 6927 lay ton Street, Ra rcho Cut amonga, stated that on August :359. shz sznt a '.etter on Cehalf of the ^eighM rs veici^.g concerns about the development and the proposal to align Layton Street with Victoria Street. She said that the residents wer,^ concerned about the safety of their children and the increased traffic. She said that Hix Development met with the residents and was now proposing to bulb Layton Street. She said the residents of the 6900 block were in favor of bulbing the street bet ause they have 25 children on the street. She said that many residents bought into the street because the street was a dead-end street and the residents felt that was safer for their children. Chairman McNiel felt that people purchasing the property should have realized that a dead-end street with a barricade would eventually be built through, He thought that police and fire access should carry a higher level of concern than children not being able to play in the street. Ne said that if the street had ended in a cul-de-sac, then the residents could probably safely assume the street would not be continued. Ms. Bellinger stated that the residents felt that trucks have adequate access as the street has been open for 12 years and their have been no acc id en is with garbage trucks, etc. She was concerned about a possible increase in crime wttn do open s~reeL. Si,e as iJ i.ii ey ieiL tiwi is yi rya ty - }.'~~ ....6:, tit property at the end of the street would no t~~sell. She Vsa id there was no advantage to Hix Development to open the street, but rather bulbing the street would give Hix Development additional buildable area. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. He suggested that the Commission first deal with the question of lowering E Street and the lots on the south portion of the tract. Mr. Hanson stated that several years ago on a tract to the west the residents to the south were very concerned with the elevations of the new homes. He urd erstbod the direction from the Commission at that time to be that the City should make every attempt to minimize the height differential. Chairman McNtel asked if it rrould provide for proper drainage at the reduced height. Mr. Hanson stated that it would. He said that Mr. Hix has indicated he can provide an alternative street design that would drain the water to the south and save 2-1/2 feet of grade. He suggested the Commission decide if the 2-1/2 feet was significant. He said that on the other pro,iect the Tentatfve Map was Planning Commission Minutes -13- June 27, 1990 /7S/ approved and the issue was raised again on the Oesign phase as well as at the rough grading point. Chairman McN iel asked the grade differential between the existing homes and the pro,l ec t, Mr. Hanson stated the houses vary in height. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing to allow the aDDl is ant to comment. Mr. Hix pro. id ed a cross section tc show the differenc es in height. Ms. Miller stated the apDl icant Dropos ed to match the existing grade at the rear property line, which is higher than existing houses. She said the alternate plan would make it possible to lower the houses below the existing grade as much as 2.3 feet. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. He stated that because the tract to the south previously used a lot of grading to dig into the ground, St created a negative impact upon the tract being considered tonight. He felt it may not make sense to force this developer to continue to grade. Commissioner Lhiti ea recalled extensive hearings with a tot of testimony regarding the issue when the previous tract was aDProved. She was hesitant to merely approve the new tract without taking into account the homeowners to the south. However, she indicated 2.3 feet did not seem to be a significant difference. Commissioner Melcher stated he was in favor •of through streets, especially given *_he length of the dead end streets. He felt the dead end streets may delay emergency ven tc les to reaCning anotn er location 1T tney snou ld perhaps take one of the streets by accident and then have to back up. Commissioner Chitiea shared Commissioner Melcher's concerns regarding the streets going throw gli. She felt it would make sense for the new development for the streets to continue through, but she did not feel it was essential. Chairman McNiel felt that Mignonette needs to ga through, but he did not feel that it was quite so Lritical that Kirkwood and Layton do so. He said he had seen other streets with more confusing access than those streets. The Commissioners reviewed the plans. Commissioner Chitiea felt that the amount of traffic generated by cutting tnrnugn w,utd nor he that significant. She fel*_ i! would not entourage people trom ou is tde the neight~o rhood to use the streets a5 shortcuts. Ms. Miller showed graphics from the traffic study. She indicated the study indicates there would be more trips at the bulb end of the street, but fewer trips at the open end of Layton and Mignonette. She said the numbers were not substantially different in either case. Planning Commission Minutes -14- June 27, 1990 ~7~ [t was the consensus of the Planning Commission that Mignonette should be open. Commissioner Melcher felt Lhat Kirkwood and Layton should also go Lh rou gh. Commissioner Chiti ea stated she sympathized with the residents, but agreed from a planning and safety standpoint she felt it made mare sense to go through. Chairman McNiel agreed. He said the City has Lri ed Lo provide access th rovahout the community. He stated that from a safety and circulation standpoint. he felt the streets should ga through. Commissioner Ch itiea stated that the applicant had raised a Gu estion regarding the ouild ing of the models concurrently with working on the street improvements. Mr. Hanson stated that the City Council had recently passed a Resolution requiring that street improvements be completed prior to issuance of building permits on collector streets to avoid subJ ec Ling the neighbors to construction traffic prior to street improvements being in place. Commissioner Ch iti ea stated that requirement was necessary for the protection of residents. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated that grading permits could be issued prior to the street improvements. Commissioner Melcher asked if there was any leeway in the Resolution because he could understand the desire to have the models ready when the street ~amo~,~ ,moo ;~ Mr. Maguire responded that staff and the Commissions shall consider the P,esolution. He said that it is a Resolution rather than an ordinance, so the Commission would have leeway if they felt there are unique circumstances. Commissioner Melcher agreed to follow the City Council direction. Commissioner Chitiea felt it makes good sense to protect existing residents. Chairman McNiel asked if the developer would be eligible for reimbursement of the off-site storm dra In improvements. Mr. Hanson stated he would be eligible for reimbursement from the City. He said that some of the drains are scheduled to be installed by the City if the bUd ^y et ho ld~ H. ga iA if thn A.ains i;ave npt yot hown in,ciailed; the developer would be required to install them. He stated that the City has not had a chance to fully review the study submftted by the developer regarding the depth of flow added to Amethyst. Ne said that any additional drafna ge must be considered and the drainage problem should be solved. Planning Commission Minutes •15- June 27, 1990 / 7~ Chairman McNiel stated that infrastructure must go in. He said reimbursement agreements would provide partial reimbursements. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing to allow Mr. Hix to comment. Mr, Hix stated that if the streets go through at Layton and Kirkwood as shown on the plans and E Street were to be lowered, the water would have to run down Layton Street. He stated they hod prepared cross-sections going from the homes on Mignonette through their north and south lots. He felt the grading differential was insignificant aiM they should not be required to funnel the water to Layton and to require the construction of storm drains on Layton. Mr. Hiz stated they had studied the whole tract to the south and it can not take any additional water. Chairman McNiel asked if it is possible to drain from east to west. Mr. Hanson stated that the only way to lower the street would 6e to lower ?• at Layton and drain to Layton. ` Mr, Hix stated that presently the water goes along E Street to Amethyst. He stated that the lots are 75 feet deep a~ the difference of a few feet would be insignificant. Mr. Maguire stated that if there is no need to lower the lots, the water could go along Amethyst whether Layton is connected or not. Commissioner Me lc her stated that if the developer must complete perimeter streets before beginning construction, to then oDlf ga tea grading scheme to go into the existing tract to instail drainage would be counterproductive. He preferred that the E Street water be conducted out to 1Lnethvst. Mr. Hix reiterated his objections to the additf onal street work required to the north and south of their project boundary and the reconstruction of Mignonette. Chairman McNiel again closed the public hearing. Mr. Hanson said the developer has baen requested to hire a soils firm to test the pavement to see if Mignonette needs additional work. He said the.^e may not be a need to do any work. Ms. Miller stated that most of the concern arose because surface drainage from the tract would be routed down Mignorette. Chairman McNiel awes tinned the additional street arork ex tend inn Devond tha VV VIIUar~CS Of the projett. - Mr. Hanson stated that the developer is being asked to remove two bulges on the street 6ecau se it i5 a narrow street. He said this is consistent ai th previous requirements of other developers. Planning Commission Minutes -16- June 21, 1990 Commissioner Chili ea felt that the conditions were fair and consistent. She agreed that ailowing the water to flow to Amethyst would be acc epta6le. Commissioner Melcher concurred. Mr. Han SOn stated that he felt the applicant's objection to the and erg rbu nding was to extending the and erg round inq to correspond to the Street imp rovemen ts. He said he was concerned that file poles near the curb on the off-site improvements would have to be relocated and it would be cost effective to complete the and ergrou nd ing for the two out-parcels at this time. He said the developer would be eligible fora rei mbu s esent agrzement rrom ru to re development of those properties. Commissioner Chiti ea stated that also was consistent with what has been done in the past. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing to allow Mr. Hix to comment. Mr, Hix stated that one of the requirements was that the utilities be and erg rou nd ed on the opposite side of Hillman into the houses. Chairman McNiel again closed the public hearing. Mr. Hanson stated that the developer was not being asked to rewire the houses. He said ff need be, the developer could put up poles on the opposite side of the street, but the poles would then be on the same side of the street as the existing houses. Commissioner Melcher felt that if the developer completes the utility work in the right-of-way, it should not be a requirement to revise the electrical Services to the tnd iv id nal hnmoc h,.t tig ~+. $C'. 'yJ'2; ;kvu rv ue un the same side of the street as the houses they would be serving. Commissioner Chiti ea agreed. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by CAiti ea, to adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 14192 for 65 lots. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; CHITIEA, MLNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER -carried ..... 10:06 - Planning Commission Recessed 10:14 -Planning Commission Reconvened Planning Commission Minutes -17- June 27, 1990 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT '~ '~ LL" -;' "~ O ATE: November 7, 1990 T0: Mayor and Membe r5 of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 AM ENOME Ni - SAM'S PLACE - appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to extend the hours of operation for an existing bar and restaurant, located at the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th Street, in the Neighborhood Commercial Oist rict - APN: 201-611 -56, 58, 59, 8 60. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing to review this appeal. If the City Council determines to either uphold the appeal frever se the Pla nni n9 Commissior. decison) or to deny the appeal (uphold the Planning Commission decision), then staff should he directed to prepare a Resolution with ti nd ings for your review and approval at Lhe next regular meeting under the Consent Calendar Section. 9 ACKGROU ND: In order for the City Ccuncil to assess the appeal, it is important to review the background. The business location has a long history o` non-compliance and nuisance prohlems by prior tenants, specifically the Boar's Head, The August 22, 1990 Planning Commission Staff Report described in detail the history of such nuisance problems for the business location. The applicant took over the business of Stratton's in March of 1990. The business was renamed Sam's Place. It serves lunch and dinner with full bar facilities but without live entertainment. Thore are na changes to the interior. The menu has an Italian emphasis. The dinner menu has more variety Lhan the previous businesses of Stratton's and Boar's Heal Bar 8 Grill. Attached for your reference is a letter dated May 11, (gqn, n<_scribi.^.^, d=*~'1 the b" nes. and the reasons fcr their request to extend Lhe~closing time to 2 ,a .m. ANALYSIS: The Commission reviewed the proposed request at the August 22, 1990 public hearing. They recognized the long history of code violations and nuisance problems. They also noted that circumstances have changed. Sinr-e live entertainment had been eliminated and the restriction of hours of operation to 11 p.m. in 1985, the City has not received any more complaints from the surrounding residents. Further, the Sheriff's Department has not received any calls /7% CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 79-03 - SAM'S PLACE November 7, 1990 Page 2 for service since March of ?990 when the establishment became Sam's Place. Some memhe rs of the Commission felt that the current applicant should not be penalized far past problems created by previous owners /cpe rotors. Other members of the Commission felt the extension of the hours of ope ra Lion may not provide compatibility to the surrounding residents ar~d could cause the former problems to resurface. ?he Commission. deliberated on the issue of whether the hours of operation should he extended and if so, for haw many days of the week. The Commission finally approved the amendment allowing the extension of hours of operation from ?1 p.m. to midnight Sunday through Thursday, and from 11 p.m. to 2 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The Commission also agreed that the approval was fora period of six months subject to Commission review for any ez tension. The Commission then directed staff to prepare such Resolution of Approval for their review at the next regular meeting of September i2, 1990. Minutes of the August 22, 1990 Planning Commission Meeting are attached for your review. FACTS FOR FINDING: In order to approve this appeal, in full or in part, specific facts to support the fallowing findings must be made by the City Council: That thn proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, ttie objet tives of the Development Code, and the pu rpeses of the district in which the site is located; and B. That the proposea use will „vt L ,. ., - '^'. is r1.o ~„67;r health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improv ement5 in the vicinity; and C. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Develooment Cade. OPTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER: 1, If the City Council can make the findings to uphold the appeal and reverse the Planning Commission decision, Lh en a motion to deny the applicants' request to modify the Conditional Use Permit would be in order and staff would prepare a Resolution of Denial for your review and approval at the November 21, 1990 regular meeting under the Consent Calendar. 2, [f the City Council decides to deny Lhe appeal and uphold the Planning Commission decision, then a motion to approve the applicants' request to modify the Conditional L'se Permit would he in order and staff would prepare .a Resolution of Approval for adoption at your nett meeting. As part of this option, the Council may modify, in part or in full, the Conditions of Approval for the Conditional use Permit. ~~ CITY COO NCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 7R-03 - SAM'S PLACE November 7, 1990 Page 3 Respel y s A ~ ted, Bra City Planner BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "1" Exhibit "2" Exhibit "3" Exhibit "4" Exhibit "5" Appeal Memo from Mayor Dennis Stout Appeal Memo from Councilmember Pam Wright August 22, t990 Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 90-111 for CUP 78-03 Amended August 22, 1990 Planning Commission Staff Report /~ / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 13, 1990 T0: Members of City fbu it ~ FROM: Dennis L. Stout, May SUBJECT: APPEAL DF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS-03 AMENDMENT - SAN'S PLACE I hereby appeal the September 12, 1990, decision of the Planning Commission approving expanded hours of operation for Sam's Plate, an existing bar and restaurant located at the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th Streets. I feel that this type of use during late hours is inappropriate within residential neighborhoods. DLS:gs /Sa ''Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMLSNGA MEMORANDUM GATE: SeptamDer T0, 3990 T0~ Members of the City Council ~~~ Pemels J. Nrlqht, Councilmamher ~ SUBJECT: COYhTT10MILL BeE PERMIT 7R-0v av.rw...+.. _ ~~ c ~'~ ~' '~~ a o p F ~ 2 J > 19n I I hereby appeal Ne SeptamDer 17, 1990 decLion of Che Planning Comiuion approving expanded hours of operation for Sam'• Plaee, an exietinq Dar and tataurant locaeed at the northwet coma o! Carnelian and 19th Strata. I Cal that this types of use during late hours ie inappropriate Mithin residential nsighborhoads, PJN; dja l83 yam ~' were primarily concerned that Lhurch Street be widened. He said there did not seem to be a tremendous concern on the part of the neighbors. He showed slides of the site plan and floor plan and elevations. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he had always felt that the Office/Professional designation for this property was not appro Driate, as it is too far removed from like us es_ He felt Medium Residential was *_he proper "_esignati on and he supported the project. Commissioner Chi ti ea agreed that the particular project proposed on the site is the best use of the site, but stated she is concerned with overall density in the City. She felt that the City should look closely hefore changing any other designations in the City. She said if the project were not so well designed or in another location, she would not have been so willing to support the project. Chairman McNiel felt the project is well designed and he liked the du p7ez concept because it appears residential. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Melcher, to adopt the Resolutions recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Mendment 90-O1B and Envi roinental Assessment and Development District Amendment 90-02. Motion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES: CDMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER N n CC. MYY ICCinMCOC: YOYC AO SENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried E. CONDYTIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 AMENOIENT - SAM'S PLACE - A request to extend the hours of operation for an ex st ng bar and restaurant, iota ted at the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th Street fn the Neighborhood Commercial District - APN: 201-811-56, 58, 59, and 60. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked what time the applicant proposed to stop serving dinner if the iaurs were extended. Ms. Fong stated she did not know. Lhatnnan McNiel opened the public hearing. John Mannerino, Mannerlno 6 Brlgugllo Law Offices, 9333 Base Ltne Road, Suite 110, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that the liquor license requires that food be served during the entire time that alcohol 1s served, and the full dinner menu Planning Commission Minutes -A- August 22, 1990 Igy would 6e served until closing time. He gave a brief history of Lhe ownership of the establishment. He said that the first two owners have not owned the business since 1985 and there has been no live entertainment since that time. He felt that the previous problems had been resolved as soon as the live entertai mment ceased. He stated that Sam Pellegrino has owned the business sine March and the Sheriff's Oepartme nt had not been called to the premises ante in that time. He felt that the hours of operation do not cause pro 6l ems, but rather the way Lhe es to 617shme rt is run. Mr. Mann erino stated chat the request for extended hours was to allow the business to be competitive. Hearing no further testimony, Lhaf rman McNi el closed the public hearing. Commissioner Melcher felt it was not fair to tie the present owner's hands because of another person's doing. He thought an experimental period of increased hours was merited. He felt that if a six mo ntA period of increased hours proved successful, then the extended hours could be ca ntinued; but if any problems arose, then the closing time could be dropped back to 11:00 P.M. Commissioner Neinberger felt tt might be better to extend the hours only on Friday and Saturday evenings. She felt the outcpme should be nevi awed later. Commissioner Lhitiea was opposed to extending the hours. She felt the people in the neighborhood had suffered for many years in the Dast and a late night crowd is different from a dinner crowd. She felt the extended hours were inappropriate because of the pro ximlty to homes. Commissioner Tolstoy felt the situation has changed because live entertainment is not proposed. He also stated that the former owners stooped servi no fond after dinner and served only token food at night 1n order to keep their license. He stated he shared Commissioner Chitiea's concerns regarding the neighborhood; but because the full menu would be served and there Mould be no live entertainment, he felt it would be appropriate to allow atrial period of extended hours. He Dropos ed the hours be extended to midnight rather than 2:00 A.M. with the possibility of extending the hours later if the trial proved successful. Ralph Hanson, Deputy C1ty Attorney, stated that Gondtttonal Use Penit rights are property rights that run with the land absent extraordinary conditions. He said the City could not place a time limit pn extended hours without the specffic consent of the applicant. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing to allow the applicant~to comment. Mr. Mann erino stated that the applicant was more Lhan willing to voluntarily place the matter for review. Mr. Mannerfno pointed out that the surrounding residents were noticeably absent from this evening's hearing even though they had received written notification of the proposal. He stated that the owner had visited each of the neighbors who are within 300 feet of the property line and told them of their proposal to extend the hours and had invited the residents to visit the bar. He said they would voluntarily submit to a Planning Commission Minutes -5- August 22, 1990 I ~'S reexamination of the permit in six months if the Planning staff felt one were warranted. He felt a three-month trial period would not be realistic because it would Probably take that long before people realized they were open later. Mr. Hanson asked if the applicant would acknowledge that the extended hours would terminate absent an extension by the Planning Commission. Mr. Mann eri no agreed they would stipulate that the Conditional Use Permit could he modified upon review by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the Comaission would even have to wait six months if a problem develops because a Conditional Use Permit can be reviewed at any time if there are probl etas. Mr. Hanson stated that the standards for revocation of a Conditional Use Permit are extreme; either violation of a set condition or proof of a substantial and immediate detriment to the health, safety, and welfare in the area. He felt it would be better to have the extended hours au tgnaii tally end if the Commission did not take affirmative action to continue the extended hours. Chairman McNiel stated he did not like the Concept of all awing bars in neighborhood shopping centers because there have been problems in the past. However, he said he had observed that it can work successfully in Europe when there is no live entertai anent. He stated that under Drevious ownership the back door was left open and a lot of noise fraa the band and patrons filtered through the alleyway Lo the neighboring residences. Sum ~ ltyri ~- c~.a a otar~ 66911 Carnelfan. Rancho Cucamonga, stated h! was co-owner. He-stated that on average Friday and Saturday evenings tney serve 15 to 80 dinners. Chaff anon McN 1e1 again closed the pu 011c hearing. He stated that he was inclined to take the risk with the understanding that the extended hours would be reviewed in six months. Ne stated he would like to give the benefit of the doubt to the new owners and the burden would be on the owners to show that the extended hours would not negatively tlapact the neighborhood. Commissioner Tolstoy suggested the extended hours be until M dnight seven days a week. Motion: Moved by Metcher, seconded by Neinberger, to direct staff Lo Drepare a Resolution aDProving a temporary xiz-month extension of boon to 2:00 R.M. seven nigh Es a week fcr Conditional Use Pet+nit TS-03. Motion failed try the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER, NEINBERBER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CMITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -fatted Planning Coaaalssion Minutes G6- August 22, 1990 /6 Motion: Moved by Tolstoy to direct staff to prepare a Resolution approving a temporary six-month extension of hours to midnight seven days a week. Chairman McN iel stated Lhat would be a weak test. Mr. Hanson asked if such a motion would be acceptable to the applicant. Mr. Manneri no stated it would be acceptable only if they would be allowed to stay open until 2:C0 A.M. cn `ri days and Saturdays. Motion died for lack of a second. Motion: Moved by Weinberger, seconded by Melchor, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution approving a temporary six-month extension of hours to midnight Sunday through Thursday and 2:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday for Conditional Use Pernit 78-03. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCN IEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA ABSENT: COMM:SSIONE RS: NONE -tarried Mr. Mannerino asked if the boon could be changed effective immediately. Mr. Hanson replied the hours could not change until following the signing of the Resolution. 8:10 P.M. - Planning Cammissi on recessed 8:20 P.M. - Planning Commission reconvened G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONOITIOMAL USE PERMIT 90-23 - ALLMRRK, INC. - The request to establish a 6u 11 ding contractor's office and yard within the existing S1zth Street Industrial Park on 4.74 acres of land in the General Industrtal District, Subarea 5 of the Industrtal Specific Plan. located at 100% Sixth Street - IIPN: 209-211-40. Bruce Buckinghaia, Planning Technician, presented the staff report: Commissioner Melcher asked why the use was already established prior to an approval of the Conditional Use Penatt. Mr. Buckingham replied that when the business license application was reviewed by the Planning Depar4ent, it was noted that a Conditional Use Permtt was required and the aDPlicant began processing an application. Planning Commission Minutes l -G7- August 22, 1990 / O 7 RESOLUTION N0. 90-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIfO RN IA, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 78-03 FOR AN EXISTING BAR/RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHMEST CORNER Of 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEI GH80 RHODO COMMERCIAL OISTR ICT, ANO MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56, 58, 59, AND 60. A. Recitals. !i) Sam's Place, Luanne R. Pellegrino, has filed an application for the amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 78-0's as described in the title of this P,e solution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub3ect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." (if) On the 22nd day of August 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to September 12, 1990. !iii) On September 12, 1990, the Planning Commission concluded said hearing. (iv) All legal prerequisites Dr for to the ado pf.lon of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Lity of Ra ntho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the farts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Pe solution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced Du Dlic hearings on August 22 and September 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together wfth public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Carnelian with a Street frontage of 1,037 f nP4 anH in4 dPnth of 2aG fert And if erF 4infiV imorov e_d wi tH a sho aG ina_ center; and (b) The property to the north of the sub3ect site is a future freeway, the property to the south is an existing shopping center, the property to the east is an existing shopping center, and the property to the west is existing single family residences. /t~~ PLANNING COMMISSION "-S OL U7ION N0. 90-111 AMENONIEN7 TO LUP 78-,,. - SAN'S PLACE September 12, 1990 Page 2 (c) The proposed amendment contemplates extending the hours of operation to coincide with those established by the applicant's alcoholic beverage control license, that is from the current closing hour of 11 p.m. to a new closing hour of 2 a.m. seven days a week. (d) Tne current limitation on hours of aperatf on to 11 p.m. was established as a direct result of a history of public safety and public nuisance p.*obl ems associated with the former tenant, the Boar's Head. (e) The fo ~~er problems have not occurred since the curtailment of the hours to 11 p.m. and the elimination of related entertainment. (f) The Sheriff's Department records indicate no calls for service at this address under the current tenant, Sam's Place, since they opened for business. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Cammissf on during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obJ ec ti ves of the 6eveiopment Code, and the purposes of the dfst rict in which the site is located. • ~r---- w • .~yca¢r wi w NIe GU nOI[lUnS applicable thereto, will not be detrisental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in,lurious to properties or improvements in the vicf nity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: Plannina Division 1) The hours of operation for the bar and restaurant shall be between 11 s.m, to 12 p.m. (a dnight) Sunday through Thursday and between I1 a.s. to 2 a.m. Friday and Saturday. 2) this approval is granted sub,~ect to a full food menu being offered during all business hours. 3) Ex tens ton of hours of operation is granted for a six-awntA period, unless extended by the Planning Caawission. X89 PLANNING COMMISSION ^-SOL UT ION N0. 9C-111 AMENDMENT ?0 CUP 78-. -SAM'S PLACE September 12, 1990 Page 3 4) Approval of this request shalt not waive compliance with all sections of the Developsent Code and all other applicable City Ordinances. b) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon the surrounding residents, adjacent businesses and tenants, includi^.g but not limited to, noise, loitering, or disturbances, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of use. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. RPPROVEO ANO AOOPTEO THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING CO~IfIISSION OF THE CITY, OF RANCHO CUCANONGA 8Y ATTEST I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commisston of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ¢:nd regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September 1990, by the following vote-ta-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA A95ENT: COl4!:SSIONER;: NCME I /~ 1:11~T yr ICH1V l.RV VUtiH1V1Vi~~~+ STAFF REPORT ..ATE: September i"c, i550 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 18-03 AMENDMENT - SAM'S PLACE - A request to extend the hours of operation for an 2x fisting bar and restaurant, located at the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th Street in the Neighborhood Commercial District - APN: 201-811-56, 58, 59, and 60. (Continued from August 22, 1990.) I. BACKGROUND: On August 22, 1990, the Planning CommissTOn conducted a public hearing to review the proposed request as described above. The Commission directed staff to oreoa re a Resolution of Npproval extending the hours of operation from 11 p.m. to 12 midnight on Sunday through Thursday and from 11 p.m. to 2 a.m. Friday and Saturday. A full menu should be available during all business hours. The Commission also stated that the use should be reviewed in six months for compl to nce with the Conditions of ADPro val. Attached for your rev tew is the Resolution of Approval with the appropriate conditions. If the Commission concurs, then adopt loo of the resolution would be in order. Res u ly su Bra 8 or City Planner ~- BB:NF/,)fs Attachments: August 22, 1990 Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution of Approval /9i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 22, 1990 TD: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Flannar BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUOJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PE RM I? 78-03 AMENBMENT - SAM'S PLACE - A request to extend the hours of operation for an existing har and restaurant, located at the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th Street in the Neighborhood Commercial District - APN: 201-811-56, 58, 59, and 60. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting that the existing condition of approval limiting hours of oDe ra Lion from 11 a.m. td 11 p.m. be amended by extending the closing time to 2 a.m. [I. BACKGROUND: In order for the Planning Commission to assess the applicant's request, it is important to review the background. The business location has a tong history of non-compliance and nuisance problems by prior tenants as summarized below: On December 27, 1978, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the Boar's Head restaurant with bar and entertainment. Due to consistent complaints relating to noise, loud music, fights, and loitering, the Planning Commission had reviewed the Conditional Use Permit several times and modified the conditions of approval to mi tlgate these probi ems. Some of the mitigation measures added were limited hours of operation to 2 a.m., structural changes to buffer noise, and installation of speed bumps within the shopping center. In 1983, the Planning Commission again reviewed this Conditional Use Permit due to complaints received and modified the conditions of approval through more restrictive hours of operation (11 p.m. closing), add itf onal noise attenu at tng materials to reduce °t^r!d. ,.nd .nterid. .,disc. ..nd .equ'red -pl e..._ntatton of dinner menu. In 1985, the Planning Commission further modified the Conditional Use Permit by keeping the operating hours to 11 p.m., and eliminating the live entertainment use. On September 6, 1965, the City Council heard an appeal by the applicant and upheld the decision of the Planning Commission. / `' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AMENDMENT 70 CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE August 22, 1990 Page 2 In April of 1988, the Boar's Head closed and was reopened as Strattons under different ownership. No comola lots were received during the period that Strattons was open. 1[I. ANALYSIS: A. General: this applicant took over the business of Strattons in March of 1990. The business is renamed Sam's Place. It serves lunch and dinner with full hat facilities but without live entertainment. There are no changes to the interior. The menu has an Italian emphasis as shown in Exhibit "C." The dinner menu has more variety than the previous businesses of Strattons and Boar's Head Bar d Grill. Attached for your reference is a letter dated May 11, 1990, describing in detail the business and the reasons for their request to extend the closing Lime. R. Extension of Hours of Operation: The current operating hours for the bar and restaurant are limited to between 11 a.m, and 11 p. m. The condition of approval was imposed to address the past problems of disturbances and noise. Since the limitation of hours of operation was imposed in 1985, the City has not received any tamplaints from surrounding residents. The request to extend the hours to 2 a.m. may create an opportunity- for problems in the future. The site 15 very ~•~-~ t .•,y ~~ flu ~ll~ ~'"i~m,~ea oi. LIIC wOL lIUC as lOOwll on the site plan, Exhibit "A." Parking areas for the patrons of the bar could overflow to the parking area immediately west of the building which abuts the residences. Certain activities such as drunkeness, noise, loitering are likely to occur due to the nature of the bar business. Such activities could adversely impact the ad,jatent residences. C. Pur ose of Hei hborhood Sho in Center: The purpose of a neighborhood shopping center s to provide for immediate day to day convenience shopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. STte development regulations and performance standards are intended to make land uses in Lhe shopping center compatible and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential areas. Staff Ts concerned that extendlny the hours of operation until 2 a.m. may oat be to harmony with the single family character of the surrounding areas. / ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AMENDMENT TO CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE August 22, 1990 Page 3 The applicant pointed cut that the Planning Commission had approved other bar and restaurant businesses with longer operating hours in the evening, such as the Pepper's Cantina, at the northeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue. 1n reviewing Pepper's Cantina restaurant and bar, staff finds the situation different, as there are no single family residences immediately abutting the site. There are apartments located on the east side of the site while Pepper's is closer to Archibald Avenue on the west side. The single family residences are all buffered from Pepper's Cantina by Archibald Avenue and 19th Street. D. Fire and Sheriff Deoa rtments: Both Lhe Fire and Sheriff Departments have been contacted for comments. The Fire Department indicated that they foresee no problems with the extension of hours of operation. However, the Sheriff's Department recommended maintaining the existing closing time of 11 p. m., given the history of the site. E. Conclusion: Based on the above, staff concluded that the extension of the hours of operation may 6e detrimental to the surrounding single famf ly residences because of their close proximity and because of the nature of the bar facilities. Therefore, staff would not recommend the extension of the hours of operation. Should the Commission disagree, other opt tons are available: Approve request, i. e., II a.m. to 2 a.m. daily. 2. Approve extension to 2 a.m. for Fridays and Saturdays only. 3. Approve a limited extension, possibly to 12 p,m., either daisy or on Fridays and Saturdays only. I[I. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve this application, in full or in part, the following findings must be made 6y the Planning Commission: A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Sode, and the purposes of tha district in whicn the site is located. S. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially tn,jurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPO P.T AMENDMENT TO CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE August 22, 1990 Page 4 C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. IV, CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Inland Val lev Da ilv Bulletin newspaper, the property has been pasted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reconmtends that the Planning Conenission deny the request to extend the hours of operation to 2 a.m., or consider one of the options noted above. Attached for your review is a copy of the Resolution of Genial for your adoption. Respec tfu~l ly submitted, Bu Tler City Planner BD:NF/jfs Attachments: May I1, 1990 letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan F^hi hi• ^r^ _ Mn^n Fn_. C_.,.r ._ O, .__.. Resolution of Denial l/~ ~ ~ VV May 11, 1990 Mr. Brad duller CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Plenning Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Buller: Please be adWsed that we represent Sam"s Place, doing business et the address as set forth In the attached Uniform Apph;.acion for Conditional Use Permit. The current owner, Luanne R. Pellegrino, took possession of the business duNng the second week of March, 1990 end purchased the business from Thomas Mulholland, who did business as Stratton's, on April 23, 1990 . While the [ormat of the menu has changed slgnlficently to emphaslxe 1[alien food, nevertheless, the primary nature of the business during the hours after 9:00 p. m. remains that of a small food end beverage vending establishment. Since [he hours chat were limited by the Plenning Commission during the period of time the business was known a, the Boer's Head, requlNng a closure o[ 11:00 p.m., other liquor vending estebltahmenta have opened in the town rn inrreaw rhn rnm...rlHnn we .,,.c_. ..,..._ __ _ of Gar end reatauranca which are et the corner of Foothill and Heven~ ,and, perhaps more appropriately, the bar next to Pepper's Cantina, which Is at the corner of Archibald end 19th Street. It is I am sure obWOUS chat this places our cllene ae a slgNflcant disadvantage In attempting to compete In the marketplace with other similar eatabllahments whose buafnesa is the sale of food and alcoholic beverages, It Is therefore necessary to expand the hours to those which are allowed by the Alcohol Beverage Commission, six I6) days a week, If this business is to be a viable one to the new purchasers We Invite your ateentlon to the rewrd of the establishment run by Mr. Mulholland end point out co you that Its record la Wrtually devoid, co our knowledge, o[ any claims or ineidenta, dlaturbencea or criminal actlWty, at or near this eatabllahment for a perod of time In excess of two 12) yee.•s, Both Mr. Mulholland and the current owner, who has been fn possession since March !?, !990, have takes great pain; to run an eatebiiahment which Is orderly, quiet, and entirely In accord with the law. There la no reason to presume that this clrcumatence will change were the hours of operation to be extended an additional three (3) hours. The manager of this restaurant, the husband o[ the owner, Sam Pellegrino, hea managed berg and reatawenta in New York for ten (10) years prior to their move to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and clearly demonstrates the papebtlity of malntalning order end propriety In en eacabtlehment each es this. 196 9733 BASELINE AOAf), SUITE 110 / RANCHO CeCAMONGA. CA 917701 TFi (7141 1100 / `""17141 941 °`t0 Mr. Brad Buller CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May ll, 1990 Page 2 We therefore respectfully request that you consider this expansion of hoars to require a closing lime as xc forth by the Alcohol Beverage Commission. This is abxWtely necessary to allow this bwlness to compete with other Uke businesses to the arse end alit caux no hardahlp whatsoever on the surrounding commuNty. Very c y ytours, MAN RI f & BRIGUGLiO JDAi/drf, 3N0 34tl f~1~a11N0'tl''e [•C•~J Ou,~i Y luieOb ~~~ r ,. a.~ ~~~ a 6o I ti ~ ~ 0 e z J • V • t.~ -'T- O ~~1~~~~~ ~- I p t °o?~ 1 az:f- ) o-... . e°`",~ t j~T *,_e~ ~ ~ ~~ -~-- i ., , i tI Ml i i ~ -) T~ ei _° ~ I ~= m .~ $m8 ~ Y• ~ ~. ~~ MfN )ll~ OlY)1)0 );;" i! ~ ,,,), ~• ~jlf~ i I iiiii~~~ ~' h 1 ~ ~ `~ ~~ h L i T T Z~ ~J iI O r { ` Y F, ^ \ ul i ~_.~ m ~~ _rigl113i~-i-~.., ~_:ality ~~ 2O ~yQ.JC,ciA.~~ ~._.__.~ ~ f- ~~_,~I ~ ~~ I ~ i ~r..-- L~ 1 t~-- lC ~- ~~ I ii ~,, J1 rr •, .i - it ~- I~~ - i / '~ ~. '----'~ r,, Ij , ~ ~i / s : ~ ~ NMt.. %. ~:f . F'~~r ~i'l. . ,.: ~~~~ •.k•~.. .:! .~ `^ ru . ! /' ~. ~~I / .. ' ,'r.'.S !II 6~ ih '~~ ~, ` I ~ I ~'~ • ~~ ~.~_: act ~ (: ~~ {":~~.;2: 1 •.•rr`... a ~~~ !~~ Vly I `~ ~:Os£ ~~! 1 .. __i_ -i --. ~ nc.i.'' ..;L. . ~~ a, ~ Fs 1 . ,4 X`,i%iv ~ry ~ L . ~ ~ :' I ~~ ~" -:.~ ~; ~ ~~ ~~j r• ._i? ~ . ~ I ^.-7 ' I ~ r I h ~ ~ ~4 I f~ ~. ; -.~a;a ~a (~ 1. --' i I l i i ii ~°~ .'~•P,~ I~ . i + _ SI:~ ~/ j~~ ~ a (. ~ s r r s ~ r r r V:m d ~ a ' ~STj~ ~ ~e gg ~' ~~~ .~o ~ ~ ~a o ~~o~b o ~ ~= rm ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~o~~ r r~ a 8 r i S„ ~ S= S S ~ !~ 'q M is s ~ i w yr ~ ~~Y, '~r ~ ' ,i ~: ewa i' fat .y '~.~•. 1r"_W•R gg W `y f {P aoa 8A8 »»» W m m < W i ~ d t W > ry~ H m [ i W i N N i ~. t yW ~ , 7 V «" s'.~fi::,: g'... a Q .~,,,:j ~. 3 ~ ~"'_; 3 , ~~ .~ < x9 f ~ ~R j 4 3* ! ~ ~ 4 ~" L k. ~ ~ r r,.. ~ ~`y -7 6 3 i ~ B C.. i ~a y§~ ~ ~.~ ~~ o ~ ~ '~ .j i ~ j3 Sa s ~ i N ~ '~ c e, E C_ ~~ 5 E c3 , a I s° ~1 j a~ a~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~9= ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ra _F s ~: n ~ V g g g 8 g a ~ i j ~ i ~ ,g ~ ~ . !~ I :~ , =~ _~ 1 1 1 1 ~~ j .j j - ~ ~ a ~~ ~ ~ij k ~ ~V ~i ~/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT - .y , GATE: November 1, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Count it FROM• Brad Bull^ ray Planner BY: Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner SUR dE CT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-OlA SHE RWOOD - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from flood Control/Utility Corridor to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres contained within two parcels of land located north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue, adjacent to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The City Council will also consider Open Space and Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) as possible land use alternatives. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Yery Low Residential and issuance of a Negative Declaration - APN: 201-200-37 and 1062-640- 57 and 56. ENV IRO_NME NTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT D[5 T_RI CT JV-V. - ~ncnwuuu - x request to amend the Develo{ment Districts Map from "FC" Flood Control to "L" Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres contained within two parcels of land located north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue, adjacent to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The City Council will also consider "OS" Open Space and "V L" Very Low (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) as possible sand use alternatives. The Planning Commission recommends approval of Very Low Residential and issuance of a Negative Declaration - APN: 201-200-37 and 1062-640-51 and 5R. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the G;ty Amendmentr90-01 changing"the land~use desig ationsUefro~mpFloodOControl (FC) to Very Low Residential (V L). Further, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council grant a negative declaration for the applications. DISCUSSION: At its September 26, 1990 meeting, the Plan of ng Commission reviewed the subject applications reque5 ting land use changes for 1.92 acres Contained within two parcels of land located north and south ~~C7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 90-OlA b DDA 90-01 - SHE Rw00D NOVEMBER 1, 1990 Page 2 of an ezt ensi on of Highland Avenue. During their review, the Planning Commissioners concurred with staff's analysis as detailed in the Planning Commission report of September 26, 1990. Significant issues which resulted in the recommendation included the following: Low Residential would allow the pnsn Ail;ty of the parcels to be subdivided further in the future and the lots are irregularly shaped which would make any further subdividing of the property difficult to conform with current City design standards. 2. Single family development would not be authorized for an Open Space designation. The Very Low Residential designation would allow for the develo pne nt of at least one sf ogle family home an each parcel which is the stated intention of the applicant. This designation would also limit the keeping of horses to three on the smaller parcel and four on the larger parcel, whereas the Flood Control and Open Space desf gnations do not provide limitations of the keeping of larger animals. For an in-depth analysis and additional info nna tion, please refer to the attached Planning Commission report and minutes of September 26, 1990. ce rTS coo crw nru oc• m,<oe ., .i,„ .,,.i .~.:... ,:...,. ..- ...-.-. Planning Commission Staff Report of September 26, 1990 and Planning Commission Resolutions No. 90-126 and No. 90-127, the City Council can make the following findings regarding thfs application: 1. The property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use and Development District designation in terms of access and size as evidenced by the site's ability to conform to the City's development standards for single family residential uses; and The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding pro peril es as evidenced by the conclusions and findf ngs of the Environmental Assessment; and The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Plan and Oevelopment Cade due to the site's capacity to promote the goals and obj ec ti ves for resl denti al development. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a pu bllc hearing in the Inland Va lev Dailv bulletin newspaper and notfces sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the prof ect site. ~p3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 90-OlA E ODA 90-01 - SHERWOOD NOVEMBER 7, 1950 Page 3 ACTION: If the City Council concurs wf th the recommendation of the Planning Commission for approval cf General Plan Pmendment 90-OlA and Development District Amendment 90-01, the adoption of the attached City Council Resolution and Ordinance would be appropriate. R2S pR fi y 5i >~-nd, Bra er City tanner 86:VB :mlg Attachments: Planning Conenissian Staff Report, Septemher 26, 1990 Planning Commission Minutes, September 26, 1990 Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 90-126 6 90-121 City Council Resolution of Approval City Council Ordinance with attached Exhibit "t" ao+~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '•~ STAFF REPORT DATE: September 26, 1990 T0: Choi noon and Members of the Planning Commission rpnM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Vince Berto ni, Assistant Pi ann er SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-OlA - SNERNO D - A request to amend the Genera Plan Land Use Map- fr~lood Control/Utility Corridor to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres contained within two parcels of land located north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue, ad,)acent to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The Planning Commission will also consider Open Space and Very Low Residential (less I than 2 dwelling units Der acre) as Dossible land use ai Lernati vas - APN: 201-200-37 and 1062-640-57 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND OEVEL OPMENT DISTRICT RMENOMENT 90-01 - SHEPw000 - A request to amend the Dave opment Districis Map from "FC" Flood Control to "L" Law Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres contained within two parcels of land located north •.d t~~,.ti "v ," "vtension of Highland Avenue, adJacent to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel. ine Planning Commission will also consider "OS" Open Space and "V L" Very Low (less than 2 dwelling units per acre} as possible land use alternatives - APN: 201-?00-37 and 1062-640-57 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A, Action Re uesRe ueste~d: Approval of a General Plan Amendment and Dave opal ant District Amendment and issuance of a Negative Oeclaratfon. D. S^-^^^nd+^^ t""d lion and Zoning- North - Yacant, Flood Control "FC" South - Vacant, Flood Control "FC" and future freeway East - Existing single family dwellings, Low Residential "L" (2-4 Awelling units per acre) Nest - Vacant, Flood Control "FC" in Upland PLANNING COMMISSION IFF REPORT GPA 90-Olq 6 DDA 90-01 - SNERNODO September 26, 1990 Page 2 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Flood Control/Utility Corridor N Drib - Flood Control/Utility Corridor South - Flood Control/Utility Corridor and future freeway East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units Der acre) Vlest - Flood Control/Utility Cerri dor in Upland Site Characteristics: The site slopes appro zimat ely 5 percent to the south and is covered sparsely wf th native alluvial fan shrubs. No endangered plant or wildlife is known to inhabit the site. Portions of the old flood coot rot levees extend along the sides of the parcels which border the remaining Flood Cont ral District land. The two parcels on the east side of the channel are at higher elevations than the adjoining residential lots. II. LANG USE ANALYSIS: A. Background: The property has been zoned Flood Control since the City ado Dted its General Plan and Development Code in 1983, qt the time, the property was needed for flood control purposes. The Cucamonga Creek Channel has been improved by the San Bernardino County Flood Control Oistrict; therefore, a quitclaim deed was recorded on September 2S, 1989. The land is currently located in a Flood Zone "8." Because of these changes, it is staff's opinion that the flood Control land use e.,N ~w a,~~,. Ia ~n lnnrwr annrnnrt atn. Staff has contacted the Flood Control District and they have no objection to any of the Land uses being proposed. The application originally included a parcel an the west side of the flood control channel. Since the initial Submittal, the applicant has removed that parcel from consideration under this apps icatlon. Therefore, this report will address the land use issues for the remaining two parcels on the east side of the channel. In addition, there is no current proposal to subdivide the land. The Community Services Department has i ndtcated that the property 1s not an appropriate location for a park. B. Neighborhood Meeting: The aDDltcant held a neighborhood a:eeL- F.„~w,,..r 1? iggR ;n di, ri a tha rn nc al wi4h ~~^y Or -..r._.. _.. __. 5_1S_ _ p. _p___ the neighbors on Caroi Avenue and Peridot Avenue. During the meeting, the neighbors expressed concern about a change from flood control, where no dwelling units are allowed under Development Code Standards, to single family residential. The neighbors were mast concerned about a loss of privacy because of the lot configurations and pad elevations. The subject parcels have a pad elevation which is at least 5 feet higher than existing homes and would abut the rear yards of the homes orb PLANNING COMMISSION _ .FF REPORT GPA 90-OlA 8 ppA 90-01 - SHERM00p September 26, 1990 Page 3 along Carol Avenue and Peri dot Avenue. The neighbors indicated that if they were to support a land use change to single family residential, it should not allow further subdivision of the two parcels so that the loss of privacy is not increased. Another major issue was the keeping of horses. The existing homes are not allowed to keep ha rs es because the lcis do not meet the minimum of 20,000 square feet needed to maintain horses in a Low Residential pfstrict. The neighbors did not want the two parcels in question to be allowed to have horses kept there because they were not allowed the same rights. The neighbors were also concerned about the maintenance of the existing Metropolitan Mater District property which separates the two properties because that is where any proposed homes would have to take vehicular access. C. Pro sed Low Residential Desi nation: The applicant has re4ues Led a land use des gna Lion of Low Residential. This is the designation of the existing single family homes to the east and wou74 allow fora zoning which is consistent with the neighborhood. The two parcels Tn question total 1.92 acres, which under Luw Residential developaent standards, could allow for each parcel to be further subdivided into two parcels. 0. Alternative Oesicnations: To provide the Commission with alternatives to the existing and proposed designations, staff hoc inrl nA~d et ..N ._ .a ,. at-yo;",=~ ;,.,c it a, in ciia roc ier co those under di~scussi on. For this purpose, staff anal yaed the following land use categories: 1. Ocen SDacn "OS": An Open Space land use designation would not aftow far the developne nt of single family homes on the subject parcels but would permit a variety of agricultural uses. A maximum density of one home per 40 acres is allowed under this designation. The slgntficant difference between ODen Space and Flood Control is that Open Space al laws for the development of structures rhereas Flood Control does not. 2. Very Low Residential "YL": This designation would allow for the development of one to two single family homes per arse with a airs mr~ lct si<e of 22,500 square feet. Tne southern lot could not be subdivided under this designation, however, the northern one could potentially be parceled +nto two lots. The applicant indicated to staff at the neighborhood meeting a willingness to accept any of the proposed alternate land use that would allow for single family residential development. PLANNING CONMISS [ON AFF REPORT GPA 90-OlA d DDA 90-DI - SHERw000 September 26, 1990 Page 4 Conclusions: After reviewing the applicant's proposal and the alternate land use designations, staff recommends adoption of the Very Low Residential land use for the following reasons: 1. Although Low Residential would be consistent with the adjacent development, in staff's view it is not the most appropriate land use. The hones to the east were "_eveloped w;rh the expectation Lhat the flood control property would remain as that use. Therefore, the two properties are irregularly shaped which would make any further subdividing of the property difficult to conform with current City design standards. 2. the Open Space designation Dres er ves the concepts of limited development, but due to insufficient area of these parcels, single family development would not be authorized. 3. The Very Low designation would allow for the development of at least one single family home on each parcel which is the stated intention of the applicant. The applicant has provided conceptual site plans which indicate that single family structures could be developed in conformance with Yery Low standards. Further, the Very Low designation would limit the keeping of horses to three on the smaller parcel and four on the n _..i r...~....t .a n_.... <... ~~ ai yci yuf LC i , w` '--- designations do not~Orovide limitations on the keeping of large animals. 4. If the oa reels are not used for residential purposes, then a variety of agricultural uses would be permitted. III. GENERAL PLAN AND DEV ELOPMEMT CODE CONFORMANCE: State law requires the Deve opment Code to be consistent with the General Plan; therefore, if findings can be made to warrant the General Plan Wnendment, then similar findings must also be made regarding the Development 01str1ct Amendment. The sub,{ect parcels conform with Low Residentlal, Very Low Residential, and Open Space property development standards. IV. Emil"nDNi~NT ASSESS%ENT: Staff has revie.Ved the :nitidl Study, Part I and comp eted the En virormental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study and has fount that no significant adverse environmental impacts will occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendmen4 and Development District Amendment. FACTS FOR FINDINGS; Based on the facts and concluslans listed above, s- toff beeves the Planning Commission can make the fellowing findings regarding this application: dC.~ 0 PLANNING COMI-0ISS ION AFF REPORT GPA 90-OlA a ODA 90-01 - SNERw00D S eDtember 26, 1990 Page 5 1. The property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use and development district designation in terms of access and size as evidenced by the site's ability to to nfo nn to the City's development standards for single family residential uses; and 2. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the envi re meent nor *.he surround?ng pro pert?es as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environmental Assessment; and 3. The Dropos ed amendments are in conformance with the General P1 an and Oevelopne nt Lade due to the site's capacity to promote the goals and obi ecti ves for residential development. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: These items have been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valle Dail Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted with Suppl ementa Not1f!ca Lion signs, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the prof ect site. V[I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval oP General Plan Amendment 90-OlA and Oevelopaent District Amendment 90-01 for the amendment of the land use designation from Flood Control to Very Low Residential through the ado Dti on of the attached Resolutions. Respectfully submitted, Brad B ler Li ty Planner BB:VB/,lfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - General Pian Amendment and Development District Amendment Maps EzM bit "D' -Open Space 0lsirict Uses ResoiUtiGri "netiwRaending Ap pro vai for Gen erai 'r ion Amendment 90-OlA Resolution Rewmmending Approval far Development District Amendment 90-01 v~ / i~ !I ll xv. ast~rt \ \~ j ~ vcm ou~iu \ v/caur od. mr : n ~,w ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ rcw. ~~~ ~M qYT CN \ \ \ un \ \4 LYTQ V \I µ.K~ \\ w ... y~ ~~ \~ C\ STATE ROUTE 30 OLV p17: 1/11 ITEM: GPA 90.OIA / DDA 90A1 CITY OF CAMONGA .~.~~; VICDVITY MAP PLAN ION (~ EXFIIDTT: "A" SCALE: NONE aio N CITY ar SUBJECT PROPERTY SUBJE CITY OF CAMONGA PLAN ION ~~ ITEM: GPA 90.O1A I DDA 90-01 TfCLE: GPA I DDA MAPS EXHD3fC: "C" SCALE: NONE N ~~ ~' TAOIi 1710.H0 t1tQ {660LAT[OIIO Y06 OPEN lPACR D~t'AlC'f, ~ D@fBtCl' 00 PC OC 1. 9Nela Pamily dwelWlQa (not to e:cea0 an P - - svaasa dantlty of 1 unit pee {0 note) 2 Cwb11r gwrew n. permanent P P P D. temporary C C C 3. Home Occupation - - 1. AMwary rt<'uctur~ Buell tl dsbenx: TuaTwr eerporb, dDanes. Kant Douro, Darn, stoea`e anaN, Corrals. e. Rem[ed to an-Bite ain{le tamL'y P - - LreW11Q D. Not related to on-ste dwetliry P - - 5. AariculturU Uaw a. Row Crop. truck Qerden P P P b. Plant rtore(e or propaQatlan P P P c. Orebarde, vlneyeMr, CMUtmr enA otDar trM farms P P P d GmmuNty asrden P P P e. OrewBOUew P P P t. Liveat0ak /radnQ, braedln( (110 fwd lob) P P P Q. Hydrupwd0 outlaw P P P D. On-elb nalw of peoQlob grown on alb P P P e. Gmeteeles, Cnmatorlw, Maueobumy CoLuODarluma Bad Hebtad Usw C - - 1. WRdtlfe Pra..rvw en0 9anetuarlw P P P 0. PoreR Mdnt~laow PaoiRtlee/Ret1`r Jbtloa P P P f. R+m+atleeei Uw e. Parke, pionle nrw. Db1[1o1aWa P P P D. Nlid[10r Dlldep equwtrlan trslls P P P 0. Oreenwap P P P d Dolt m11r'see C C C e. Rfdirq selwele laWrtrlN C C c f. Commeroiel ebbiee C C C /. Co[mtry ally end MIatM uew C C C 10. PrweY7atlon end ale at Bbbrls LeMmerlm aM related ueee euefl w muwume. mK pHerlw eM tmt eeevlaa to aawmmodab oo-elu usw. c c c l 1. Plood aona4 atru0turae and leMRtlw P P P l7. LI(M vaMdn parldlt a1W rtora{e In ...,,tea a~r[antieily wrrounaW Dy IndueMLL uses. - u C l7. UtWty niMatlan (Natal etPdpeelR and atrlmttww) C C C 1'CEM: GPA 90.OIA I DDA 90.01 CI'I7' OF CAMONGA ~~; wOS" DISTRICT USES PLAN ION EXHIBIT: "D" SCALE: NONE ~~ N Mr. Buller recommended that the item be continued for four weeks to allow renoticing with a new title. Mr. Shaffer said they were willing to consent to a continuance. He asked for the Commission's opi nibn with regard to his request to require the Conditional Letter of Map Revlsi on an FEMA only prior to the issuance of buf ldi ng permits. Barrye Hanson stated that the request did not canfl ict with an Ordinance, but rather an Engineering policy. He said the condition as written is how it has been applied to all other projects du rinc the last year or so. He said staff does not know there will be a problem wi t:h FEMA, and feels that the final map is the point at which the City has Che most control over the situation. He said they would like to get the situation resolved with the entire tract at one time, because the City might be Ehe fated with the possibility of phasing and involving individual homeowners, as it will be a custom lot proj eft. He said it was staff's preference that the condition be kept as written. Motion: Moved by Chi ti ea, seconded by Tolstoy, to continue Environmental Assessment and Variance 90-OB and Envt ronme nt al Assessment and Tentative Trait 14771 to October 24, 1990. Notion ca r•rf ed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, MEINBERGER NOES: COMMTSSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried . • . « " N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 6ENFRAI PI 4N AIIFNnwFNf on_nta _ turoumn _ q request to amend the Genera an land Use Map from ood ontro /Utility Corridor to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres contained within two parcels of land located north and sough of an extension of Highland Avenue, adjacent to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The Planning Commission will also consider Open Space and very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) as possible land use alternatives. APN: 201-200-37 and 1062-640-57. 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 90-01 - - request to ame the eve opieent istricts Map from o~FT od Control to "L" low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres tontalned within two parcels of land located north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue, adjacen4 to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The Planning Coasatssion will also consider "OS" imen $naCe and "VL" Yery Law Rcsi don Liai (1253 LhaD ~ d'w2l iiflg uni is per acre ai possible land use alternatives. APN: 201-200-37 and 1062-640-67. Vince Bertont, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McN1e1 opened the public hearing. Planning Camaisslon Minutes -16- September 26, 1990 ~~~ Steve Nheatl ey, J. Stephens, Inc., 10601 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the landowner merely wants to put one house on each lot. Ne said they had held a neighborhood meeting and he was available to answer questions. Cynthia Mathewson, 6524 Peri dot Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated her home is adjacent and her main concern is privacy. She said that because of the grade differential, even a single-story home would be situated above her fence. She was afraid that if the land were to be private property, owners would not Lake proper care of the property and weeds would not be removed. She apposed horses being kept on the property, but stated that she lfkes watching riders using the area. She was concerned about security and drainage. She said her property currently drains to the subject property and she questioned if she would have to change her drainage system. She indicated she had been told nothing would ever be built on the property because it was Fiaod Control property. Ruth Lol bert, 6422 Carol Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the only reason they had purchased their home six years ago was the location and the fact that no one could build on the adjacent property because ft was designated Flood Control. She felt the aspect of ruralism mould be lost if development were allowed on the property. She suggested that tbe land be declared Open Spate, and indicated that she had never seen any animals grazing on the property. She felt that puD11t enjoyment is worth more than use by only two hameown ors. She did not want horses to be sill owed on the property and did not want to Lose her privacy. Sherry Heywood, 6529 Peridot Avenue, Rancno Cucamonga, felt nor property could be devalued if her land were adjacent to hone property. She was concerned about prt vacy Detause the adjacent land 1s higher than her property and was ,w.,... wvn icv Giov nu J,is will taws oafs ns °-tivYv'itdi, 'i ~~.,.,., land adjacent to the proposed driveway, as she said it was currently difficult to get MMD to mow down their weeds once a year. She asked if the developer had approval from MIID to build the driveway on the MMD land. Paul Pettersen, Associated Engineers, 9259 Utica Avenue, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that Very Low Residential zoning would be acceptable. He said that all grading and budding would be 1n confornance with the Uniform Building Code and City standards and their runoff would not affect the neighboring lots. He felt that two additional ha~eowners mould help in applying pressure on MMD to matntaln the MMO Land. Commtsstoner Chltlea stated that the neighbors were concerned about the grade differential and she asked how mucA grading the developer planned to do on the trq lots, Mr. Pettersen repited they proposed mtnimai grading in conformance with the H111 side Grading Ordinance. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNtel closed the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -17• September 26, 1990 ~~~ Brad Buller, Li ty Planner, stated that the action before the Planning Commission was a land use issue only. He said the proposed development had not gone through the plan check process. He stated the concerns of the residents had been heard and the applicant should address those concerns. He said staff had also heard the concerns in writing as well as in this avening's testimony. Commissioner Melcher asked if there would be a possibility of restricting the keeping of horses. C hai rnan NcN ieS `ett that woutd set a dangerous precedent. He felt that people moving into the cammuni ty should accept that Ra nt ho Cucamonga is an equestrian community. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that the Commissi an was considering purely land use considerations and any specific development would need to conform to the Oeveloppent Code. Commissioner Chittea felt the Low Residential option should be eliminated and the Commission should concentrate on either Open Space or Very low Residential. Chairman McN iel stated that there is always the chance that land will 6e rezoned. He stated that the property has the opportunity to became developable because it is no longer needed by the Flood Control District. He reiterated that the Community Services Oepartaient had indicated the land would not be useful as a park. He said he was inclined to agree with the Very Low Residential designation. Commissioner Tolstoy concurred that future use would be hPSt sPrvPd ti~ , vo.,, pow nesioenttai designation. - Commissioner Melcher felt staff's analysis was correct and supported the Very Low Residential option. Commissioner CM ilea thought the Very Low Residential designation would be the best option to allow development which can be controlled. She said that Open Space would not 17ke1y remain unused for very long. She was reluctant to prohibit hones. Motion: Moved by Chltiea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolutions recommending approval of Environaental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 40-OIA and Envlrorwental Assessment and Development District Amendment 9D-O1. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CM ITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCMER, TOLSTOY, NEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Planning ComAission Minutes -18- -carried September 26, 1990 a~~ RESOLUTION N0. 90-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA, CAL[FORN IA, RECOMIiENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-OlA TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM FL000 CONTROL/UTILITY CORRIDOR TO VERY LOM RESIDENTIAL (LESS THAN 2 DMELLIN6 UNITS PER ACRE) FOR TMO PARCELS CONSISTING OF 1.92 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH ANO SOUTH OF AN EXTENSION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE CUCAMON GA CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-200-37 AND 1062-640-57 A. Recitals. (i) Bab Sherwood, on behalf of Leslie Sherwood Barnes, Aas filed an application for General Plan Weendment Mo. 90-OlA as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subJect General Plan Amendment is referred to as 'the application.' (ii) On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly nattce6 public hearing on the appiic~,tio n. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby faund, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Ltty of Rancho Cucamonga as follors: 1. This ConmHSSton hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence Dresented to this Commission during the above-roferonced public hearing on September 26, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: ;a) The aDplicatidn apples Ta apDrozimately 1.92 atii?s of land, basically a narrow linear configuration, located in two parcels north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue on the east side of the Cucaeonga Creek Channel and is presently underelopmd. Said properties are currently designated as F1oad Control/Utility Corridor; and ~/ PLAMN IN6 COMMISSION NE-,.~UT[ON N0. 90-126 OPA 90-OlA - SHERw00D September 2B. 1990 Page 3 APP0.0YED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. P LANN IMO COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning CamaTssion of the Gity of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly int raduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Caasai ssi on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coa~fsslon held on the 26th day of September 1990, by the following vote-to-wTt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCMER, TOLSTOY, NEINBER6ER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ARSE NT: CONMISS TONERS: NONE O RESOLUTION N0. 90-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 90-01, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM "FC" (FLOOD CONTROL) TO "VI." (VERY LDit RESI OE NTIAL) FOR TMO PARCELS CONSISTING OF 1.92 ACRES Of LAND LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF AN EXTENSION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE EAST 510E OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL, AN0 MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-200-37 AND 1062-64D-57 Recitals. (i) Bob Sherwood, on behalf of Leslie Sherwood Barnes, has filed an application for Development Dtst ri ct Amendment No. 90-01 as dent ri De6 in the ti tie of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub,{ett Development District Amendment is referred to as "the aDPlication." (ii) On Septmber 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 90-126 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 90-OlA he approved. (iii) Alt legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Res oluii on Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that alt of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 26, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) Tire application applies to aDDroximately 1.92 acres of land, basically a narrow linear configuration, located fn two parcels north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue on the east tide of the Cucamonga Creek Channel and is Dretently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as "FC" (Flood Control) and ~/ / PLANNING COMMISSION ESOL DT ION N0. 90-127 ODR 90-01 - SNERw000 September 26, 1990 Page 2 (b) The property to the north and west of Lhe subject site is designated "FC" (Flood Control) and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Tne property to the east is designated "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family homes, The property to the south is designated "FC' (Flood Control) and is undeveloped. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be mateN ally injurious or detrimental to Che adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the envi rorenent nor Lhe surroundi nc properties and that issuance of a Negative Declaratf on is retomeended, 3. Based neon the substantial evidence presented tb this Commission during the above-referenced public heari ~.rg and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in peragra phs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject Dr operty is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in ters+s of access, size, and camps ti bil ity with ezisti ng land use in the surrounding area as evidenced Dy the site's :"il+.; +~ ~nnlnrw +:n the Citv's Bevelopment standards for single family residential uses; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the en vi roinent nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Environeental Assessment; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan due to the site's capacity +:0 promote the goals and objectives for residential develo,rment. 4. TA1s Cantsston hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in camp'!lanee witA the CalYROrnia Envirorwental Oualtty Ace of 1970 and, further, this Cawisston hereby recoe~ends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and cond ustons set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 1 above, this Cosission hereb7~ resolves that Wrsuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Callfornta Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recamends approval on this 26th day of September 1990, of Development District lmendment No. 90-01 as specified herein. i~~~d PLANNING COMMISSION RE _UTION N0. 90-127 DDA 90-01 - SHERWOOD Septemoer 26, 1990 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEf4ER 1990, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Haan ATTEST I, Brad Butler, Secretary of the Planning Caasissi on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, da hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Canaaf ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coaission held on the 26th day of Septe~aDer 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOtSTOY, W£INBERGER NOES: COMMtSSI0NER5: NONE i~oS EiiT: wnnt»tUNE RS: NONE a~-~ RESOLUTION N0. 90 ~~a ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-OlA (TO RMEND 7HE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORRI OOR TO VERY LOW RESI DENiIAL (LESS THAN 2 DNELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR TMO PARCELS CONSISTING OF 1.92 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH ANO SOUiH OF AN EXTE NSI DN OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE CUCAMONGA CP,EEK CHANNEL), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPD ORT THEREOF. Recitals. (i) Bob Sherwood, on behalf of Leslie Sherwood Barnes, hes filed an application for General Pian Amendment No. 90-OlA as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub,l ect Genera? Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed pu 6l is hearing on the application, and following the conclusion of said public hearing adopted Resolution No. 90-i2o recommending to Ci[y Council that said application be approved and a Negative Declaration be certified. liiil n" Nnvomhor ~ loan stio r:r„ r,...".a s .no r<.., ..s o,.,.,,,. Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Resolution. (iv) A71 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set- forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Da~Btii h"re by finds and rertifi,a5 }hic nrn~"rt hac noon reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmenta~ puality Act of 1970 and hereby issues a Negative 6eclaration. ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. GPA 90-OlA - SHERW000 NOVEMBER 7, 1990 Pa ye 2 3. Based upon substantial evidence Dres ented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 7, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 1.92 acres of land, basically a narrow linear configuration, located in two parcels north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue on the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel and is presently undevel aped. Said properties are o~rrently desi gn a*.ed as Flood Control/Utility Corridor; and (b) The property to the north and west of the subject site is designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The property to the east is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family homes. The property to the south is designated future freeway and is undeveloped. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) That the property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land use designation in terms of access and size as evidenced by the site's ability to conform to the City's development standards For single family re 5i denti al uses. 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Gan rral Plan Amendment 90-OlA to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Flood Control/Utility Corridor to Very pow xesideniiai ~ioa Goa.. ~ '~•-l Y'r.^ units per acre) for two parcels consisting of 1.92 acres of land located north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue adjacent to the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel as depicted in attached Exhibit "1". The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. _.}i- d "'"v ORDINANCE N0. C.~~,~ RN OROI NAN CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 90-01, RMEN DING THE OEY ELOPME NT DISTRICTS MAP FROM "FC" (FLOOD CONTROL) TO "VL" (VERY LOIi RESIDENTIAL) FDR TNO PARCELS CONSISTING OF 1.92 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH AND SOUTH OF AN E)(TE NS [ON OF HIGHLAND AVENUE ADJACENT TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE CUCAMON GA CREEK CHANNEL, ANO MP.KING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) On December 7, 1983, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga approved the enactment of the Development Code by the adoption of Ordinance No. 211. (ii) On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development District Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 90-127, thereby recommendf ng that the City Council adapt Development Dist riot hme ndme nt 90-01. (iii) On November 7, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho ru r.amnn na helA a dniv nntirad d,hiir hn arinn anA rnnrl nAeA e,:n M,r1nn .,ri.,r to its adoption of this OrdS nance. ~ . (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 8. Ordinance. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU CAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOMS: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordinance are true and correct. SELTIOH 2 This Launch hereby finds dad P.Ar Eifiac chic nrn inrfi has been re vt ewed and considered in compliance wf th the California Environmental Quality Rct of 1970 and hereby issues a Negative Declaration. a~~ LITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. DDA 90-01 - SHERw00D November 7, 1990 Page 2 SECTION 3: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 1.92 acres of land, basically a narrow linear configuration, located in two parcels north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue on the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as "FC" (Fiaod Control); and (b) The property to the north and west of the subject site is designated "FC" (Flood Control) and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The property to the east is designated "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family homes. The property to the south is designated "FC" (Flood Control) and is undeveloped; and (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the, surrounding area as evidenced by the site's ability to conform to tra? City's developnent standards for single family resider.ti al uses; and fel This amendment would not be materialiv in,iurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surroundi n9 properties and that issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Cevelopment District Amendment 90-01 changi r,g the District designation from "FC" (Flood Control} to "V L" (Very Low Residential) fl-2 dwelling units per acre) for 1.92 acres of land basically a narrow linear configuration, located in two parcels north and south of an extension of Highland Avenue on the east side of the Cucamonga Creek Channel, as depicted in attached Exhibit "1". SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City C1 erk shalt cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once i^ tFx Sn',and Valley Oaily Su',let',n, a newspaper of generei circulation published in the City of lsntarTo, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. L__jh has ~.~e i qq ,.~-w, `fit S b~\ ~~~ ~ 1 ~ \' VL ^\ c\ \ \ t 1 w ~I ~ °~ A f~\`~ \~JJ Y 11.0 \ ~_ ~~ \ ~, 4 \ 4 TtKi Np lnl \F \\ 1 -^ 1 ~ ~ EXF~IT «~« CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: November 7, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Pia ~~er 8Y: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 89-06 - THE BANES GRODP - A request to amend the Development Districts Map from no zoning designation Co Low Residential 12-4 dwelling units per acre) for 7.94 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive - APN: 225-251-47. Related file: Tentative Tract 14'.08. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Development District Amendment 89-06 and issuance of a Negative Oeclara Lion, ABSTRACT: The pu rpase of the Development District Amendment is to adopt a designation that is consistent with Lhe existing General Plan desipna Lion and proposed density of the approved tentative map. Since the parcel was anticipated to be developed with a cnu rcn or ocher institutional facility, which is conditionally permitted in any residential zone, no zoning designs Lion was ever adopted. ANALYSIS: On October lD, 1990 the Planning Commission reviewed and approved Tentative Tract 14508, which was processed in ronju nc Lion with this Development District Amendment, Approval of the Tentative Tract included the development of 26 single family detached homes, which is consistent with the product on adjacent parcels. In addition, the density of the proposed su bd iv'sien is less, and the average tot size is greater, than the adjacent tracts within the Ca ryn Flanned Community. The Amendment and all other pertinent issues related to this project are completely detailed in the attached Planning Commission Staff Report and Minutes for Tentative Tract 14508 and Development District Amendment 89- n< FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In review of the application, the Planning Commission determined the following findings could be made: 1. The project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. 2. The project will opt be detrimental to the Dublic health or safety or cause nuf sa nce or significant adverse environmental impacts. ~a ~ CITY COUNCIL STAfF REPORT DDA 89-06 - JANES GROUP November 7, 1990 Page 2 3. The proposed use, subdivision map, and conceptual plans together with the Conditions of Approval are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the oro iect site. Res c f y b ed rad 1 City P1 nner BB:SH:sp Attachments: Planning Conmission Staff Report dated October 10, 1990 Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 90-130, 90-131 and 90-132 City Council Ord inanee approving Oev elopment District Amendment 89-06 as ~- vu a yr nnava.nu t,vt~aaravavun STAFF REPORT '~~ DATE: October 10, 1990 y p TO: Chai nnan and Members of the Planning Commission ~-~a FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT Bg-06 - THE JANES GROUP - A request to amend the Development Districts Map from no zoning designation to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for 7.94 acres of land located on Lhe southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive - APN: 225-25i-47 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14508 -THE JANET GROUP - A residential su bdivi Sion and design review for 26 single family lots on ).94 acres of land, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive - APN: 225-251-47 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Reaves ted: Approval of a subdivision map, site plan, building elevations, conceptual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan, Development District Amendment, and fssuance OT 11e Va LI Ve ue~i of ai~o u. B. Pro.i ect Density: 3.27 dwelling units per acre. C. Surroundin Land Use and Zonin North - xisti ng single fami y residences; Caryn Planned Community South - Vacant, future Foothill Freeway Right-of-Way; Medf um-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) East - Existing single family residences; Caryn Planned Community West - Single family residences; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) D. General Pion De5i -iiatiGrS: PP ~oj ect ite - Low ley denti al (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) ~9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ODA 89-06JEA b TT 14508 - THE JRNES GROUP October 10, 1990 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and void of any significant vegetation, with the exception of the street trees and ground cover that have been planted along the Vintage Drive frontage. Curb and gutter exist along the entire Milliken Avenue/Vintage Drive frontages and the curvilinear sidewalk is in place along Vintage Drive. The site slopes from north to south at approximately 5 percent. Applicable Regulations: Since the site has no official zoning designation, the applicant is proposing to adopt a Low Residential zoning designation for Lhe site, which is consistent with the underlying General Plan designation for this parcel. I[. BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed to the City as part of the Caryn annexation, but is not a part of the Caryn Planned Community Development Plan. According to the applicant of the annexation, the anticipated use of the site was a church and/or church related facility. A church is conditionally permitted in any resi dentf al zone; hence, a zoning designation for this parcel was never adopted. On January 25, 1989, General Plan Amendment (89-01 A) and Development District Amendment (88-OB) applications were reviewed and denied by the Planning Lommissi on. The applicant for these applications was proposing to "u pzone" the General Plan and Development Districts Map to a Low Medium Residential Jeoiyva Li mi. ni Liiuu yii ue ver irc aru by Lire ~imminy bulwnis5ion, a Conditional Use Permit (89-O1) was submitted in conjunction with the amendments for the developne nt of a congregate care facility on this site. This application was withdrawn after the denial of the Development District and General Plan Amendments. 1II. ANALYSIS: R. General: The street layout is derived from the requirement for two full means of access for cul-de-sacs in excess of 600 feet in length and access limitations on Milliken Avenue. A small portion of the improved Yf nta ge Drive street frontage will be removed near its intersection with the proposed street ..A ~~ Aa existi riy General Tel epiiu ne Switching Station is located ai the southeast corner of the site. Currently, the substation is accessed by a driveway from Milliken Avenue, which runs along the south property line of the proposed subdivision. With the development of the tract, the GTE parcel will become a lettered lot A, inclusive within this tentative tract map, and its access revised to be off the knuckle of Streets "A" and "B ." t~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DDA 89-06/EA a TT 14508 - THE JANES GROUP October 10, 1990 Page 3 Lots range in size from 7,452 to 11,760 square feet with an average size of approximately 9,21? square feet. The applicant is proposing a total of three floor plans, with three elevations each which range in size from 2,526 to 2,944 square feet. A71 pl ors are two-stories with three-car garages oriented toward the street. Oeveloarent Oistri c*_ Ame.^.dmert: In ce n~unction with the subdivision map, the applicant is requesting to have the site designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), which is consistent with the current underlying General Plan designation of Low Residential. The applicant is proposing a single family detached product which is compatible with the surrounding single family tracts. Furthermore, the density of the proposed subdivision is less, and the average lot size is greater, than the Caryn Planned Community. For these reasons, staff considers the proposed project Lo be compatible with adjacent land uses and the Development District Amendment warranted. C. Desi n Review Committee: On September 6, 1990, the Conmittee McNiel, Melcher, Coleman) reviewed the plans and did not recommend approval of the project as presented. The following changes were recommended: 1. The Building Pad on Lot 10 should be flipped in order to: a) greater separate the Lot 10 and GTE parcel ui ivena~a miJ yi - :-yC c°Cr _ :C ~::C=• 'n b) provide a greater setbac k~from the switching station to the residence. In addition, the proposed retaf ni ng wall between the driveways should be eliminated and replaced with landscape mounding and shrubbery. In order to meet these requirements, it may be necessary to increase the street frontage of Lot 10 by reducing the width of Lots 1 through 9 by a few feet each. 2. All retaining walls within 15 feet of a front property line should be elfmin ated. Instead, grade differentials between lots should be taken up gradually within the front yard area, 3. All driveways should be necked down to a maximum width of iv feet, i rna dSur2d at the driV2k3y appra,.c he:. 4. The retaining walls within future City maintained areas, on the north side of Street "C", should be faced with natural river rack. 5. The gable on the garage side elevations of all plans should be completed to achieve a more finished appearance. a3~ PLANNING COMM [SSION STAFF REPORT DOA 89-06/EA 5 TT 14508 -THE ,LANES GROUP October 10, 1990 Page 4 The base element (roc Y, or brick) should wrap around the side elevations to the return wall locations on all applicable plans. All chimneys shall be treated as to match the base element of each plan type (example - a wood sided house with a brick base should have a brick chimney). Since Pl ar. has no bast zl aaznt, either a rock or brick material could be used on the chimneys. The applicant then revised the architectural, site, landscape, and conceptual grading plans fer the site bas°d upon the above referenced issues. The Committee (McNiel, Weinberger, Butler) reviewed the project on September 20, 1990, ar.d recommended approval based on the inclusion of the previous meeting's issues. D. Technical Review Committee: On September 4, 1990, the Committee reviewed the project a~~id determined that, with the recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The Grading Committee conceptually approved the project at its meeting of August 31, 1990. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part [I of the Environmental Checklist and found that there could be a >iyniiiua n: noise impact un residences or ine su oaivi stun ii Che proposed Foothill Freeway is constructed in the future. Also, significant noise impacts are associated with the close proximity of Milliken Avenue Lo the site. An acoustical analysis recommended that a 19-foot high wail be built in the rear of the lots backing up to the future freeway off-ramp to mitigate future noise problems. Also, the noise study recommended Lhat a 1-8 foot high wall be constructed along the Milliken Avenue frontage to mitigate noise impacts associated with Milliken Avenue traffic. Staff has recommended that the sound mitigation walls be constructed with the development of this tract, so that all residential subdivisions on this corner will have their walls in place at the time the freeway is constructed, consistent with the requirement on surrounding tracts. IV. FACTS FOR FIN GIN GS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and Oevelapment Code. the project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisance or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use, subdivision map, and conceptual plans, together with the conditions of approval, are in compliance with Lhe applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. ~-3~- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DDA 89-06/EA 6 TT 14508 - THE JANES GROUP October 10, 1990 Page 5 V. CORRESPON CENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily 8~~71etin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration for 0 e;el oFnent District Amendment 89-0G through adoption uF the attached Resolution. In addition, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Subdivision Map and Design Review for Tentative Tract 14508 throw gli adoption of the attached Resolutions with Conditions, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Resp y su d, Bra ler Cit Planner BD :SH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site UtTlizatlon Exhibit "B" - Subdf vision Map Ex iii oic "i.'' - 5ice Tian Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Butl ding Elevations Exhibit "G" - Floor Plans Resolution Recommending Approval of Developne nt District Amendment 89-06 Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 14508 with Conditions Resolution of Approval for Des 7gn Revf ew for Tentative Tract 14508 with Conditions a 33 ,~ t :; \\ G a ~, -^----'~-'n-L a rer ~i... ! ~ '~. ~ I I Y`E UIIUlPk1V MIP ~.u .-,n rrH T0~ .vun nu/ ~ .u erN -~ ITEM: Ii ..;~ ,nor} `c?i-Ul; CITY OF ~~~~c~' UCAMONOA ~ PL4N:FINC~r ION TITLE: 5-*: ;N,i~~+„ s~, , ..'.. EXHBif:.~4' SCALE: ~ a3~ ._ ~~ m 0 i d < ,. 'ses IE E E~1j~ =E t CIE ~j:iii ii - ,. l ~ Il~llj 3 I~ i~ ~ 1 "' _ G p._~r.~~ I__. -x • ~ `'t-' i .~..,-~.,> 4. p 1 ~ j of ~.E ai R °4 ii 'i ,~~ -_~_ _ , U ~ i i _., , ..' ' ..i ._ ~.r '~ ,. .. Z i ' ' 'E ~ e= ~ y~ ~ ,.~ .' x:~ ji, i i, a '.:. _i %FS ~,~iL~ ~ I I i~~ r 7' "~, ~\" _ ~_: ~B WSJ ~ ~ _ _ ~~ ~ l~ j ` _ c ' U _~ ' `~•~ l l? E E F ~" s r~c:j ~j ~3s _ „~.. ~x~ , Q Ci Z O f V ~ u V i ~ a z i x ~ ,; o z °' ~ °~ W ? z W ~+~ ~ < ~ o x ~ ~ ~ O V z U ~A.`' StA HX~I II W~i _ ~ ' ~' .~, ~Ifl' 7. 111 Li.. Ile.. ',~ ~1' ~~~~ 1'.,~~ 1y y ~~. ~~. n~ ~. ~~~ I!; 1:.5• / ~: 10 e~ _ ~ ~~M ~ t " ~ ~ V 11 i ^ 11 .. 1~ ' a l , i t~ ~ • Z " ~~1 ~ a d ~, ~ y ~;; ~~~.,i ~, yL ~ii;~ ~i ~!'~~ ~~ tj ,~ it t t" f I' 1 li •, !'j ii ;,,,, I a F ,};, '1':li • t iiii•,; i I~I i{ i i r ~ i ~ ! ; - ~ :;, i \: j a i !~' I. ~l u i I ~ ~~ it ~ -,~ IIIU .i~ I ,j I i' i ' i ~1!' ! i ~ ~ (i I'~! o ;j i, ~ i,~~ i~' „}'f~,~' IGU l~,li i9t I~IIIiIi ~ u a3~~X~~~~--~~~~ J fl a ~ a ~~ a v n ~~ N ~ I i;jl Uur i 7i~ ~, i ~'' I~ - ' ~~ i ~'`~ ~ ti TAI li 1 '° ~ I~4 f I. •1 ~~a ~' . t+1~~ ~ ~~ ~7 '~ ` - L ` r ' ~ e..+' I . ~` i f-. -~ Zi ~ a _ ~ _ 1 q g _ _ `T " ~ z .. -~ . Y ea=r w....~ "f-- ~ "- av ~ Q _ ~ -..~.. Hr ~ y - r.: - _ ~ ~ . ~ _ li ~ J t 1 ~ t ~ g W .ti ~~ ~~` ~~'~~~~' ~ ~O . ~~~~ V J ~ •~ Y ~ ~. ; P,~ta i ~ a y D ~ s .~ ir,; a ~ ~ a ~, /i ~ W y ~ ~ ~ i ~ C i ~ c a ~ 1 Z Q ~~ _`-, i~t R - I ~ `~ i ii U ~ '1 ~~~~ ! ,BI ~~ - ~ // ~ I ~ ~ ,: 1 . ~ 1 ~1 ;.. ;I ~~, ... 1 ; 2. 1 ;, , ~'woa M ~ , + ~ ~+N I ' ~ +{ ~ "awry ~~ 'll + 1 ~ { 238 tx~,~ - r, Z Q l V ~ u ~'~ 2 Q G ~ _ ~ Z ~ a <u ,. ~ r F ~t i ~ v < _ ~`~ m W o x ~ ~ ~ e ' V O z v Q ~n r w ru n« IUIUN%rf I~ ~..m~un„re _ .~vwwr. urws, SM (I) PUNtII ~n rnxu sram IIGI lD IAPI(S n® Right Elevation i•ian is '`1TY OF UCAMONOA ITEM: iy ,~I ~ ,~~4t ., ;. ;. PLAN1VtN~ ION T17LE: L?~ r~ - ~;. ~-+, _., r pir_ ~a ~ N T., ,, ' E7CHIBIT: F ~ SCALE: a3~ Plan 1a "f!Y OF ~ ~ UCAMONGA PIANN'tN~r- tON ..rr, ITEM: ~ ;y5'c; fi ~`'~~G,,~.,t~ ~- E7QiIER': ~ - :"SCALE: ~' '"1 ~~ Rear Elevation left Elevation ~~1~ ~~'``' ^-1TY OF ~~ UCAMONGA PLAN1PtN4'~ - ION r-~ , Right Elevation Plan 1b f1EM:7f IySV~ r C ~i-4(. EXHIEIR'i : a ' SCALE: i ~~// Plan 1b 1'!1' OF ~ UCAMONGA I7EM:~s~ %~ O;J~ 7 ,:~, PLAN1RtNC:- (ON T ~~' ° ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ v I N ~.., :, ', EXHIBYfi ~._ SCALE: / aye Rear Elevation Left Elevation v.l„~l, ,,,~ „~ NIMMM C l~Y `ill wlKa NN lUlvG ~ ~~ G plan ?C ^-11Y OF CAMONGA F' ION .~-~.. ~U I.ANNtIW~- 771LE~ ' ' ~.~^ - ' '~ N ;~' EXHIBIT; ~ `SCALE: , aye Right Elevation Plan 1c ~' CTIY OF •~ UCAMONGA PLANNt1W~ • ,ION fIEM: jT iv';c~ ,~ G~ ~ ~'~ci, N EXHiB[[: ~ . ~ SCALE: / aye Rear Elevation Lek Elevation afll W 1X1 CIMNY (M_ ......~_ .._ . ~lXl IIYIYI II Il[ 91XY __.._ _.. Wxw rwu 1 VIIMN VNNM'_ ~ -~ ~Y ~IVIII _ _, _ _ , . ~ C W%M)ClMN9 y?VIU_ iWX Y NNN _ 4[Yl V U~M Cgl'i .~.t, OF CAMONGA P ION ,..r~ .. , ~~ U I.AN)!7tIW~r- Front Elevation ITEM: I r ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~'r. s'-.~.,, TR1E: ~: ill, c~,,. Ci, N EXHIBIT:,~_"" SCALE: -. ~S Right Elevation Plan 2a Plan 2a ~. CITY OF 1~A~Qi~~ UCAMONGA PLANNIN~- ION ITEM: ~ICricF T U(%r~"l ~i• EXHBCf: =-;;" SCALE: :. ~yM Rear Elevation Left Elevation 4 W IH f1~.WlY UI .wvlrt Dui uvv ,x~yl irrn am m.nn • UIIHI 1%%M Front Elevation Plan 2 b P~ ~ ' ~ ;v ~? CITY OF ~ UCAMONGA TrP[.E: i~~J,~ ~ ~ C:,_,-~~~~ F;f,,ab) N PIANNIN(,`r D !ON E?CHIBTf: (- . ' SCALE: i. ~~ Rift Elevation Plan 2b ,r~~' F CITY OF ~ REM:_ 'a 'c? ~ A'_cu~ :~ UCAMONGA 4TILE: n,. " ., [ . -«, .. , PLANiQY1W~a- D~ [ON ,~ . C'~ ,rr..; N ./•' EXHGIBff:~~=-'c' SCALE: ~ ~6 Rear Elevation Left Elevation M(t n41N Cli •i u»cnn i .. wr.nr m ~..+en ~. ~+so nnuu . o rnuH _. .^i v uxnu Front Elevation Right Elevation cla.. ?e `~~~ C11'4' OF ;~'C~' ~~UCAMONGA TITLE: ~', , ~..~ ,,. ~ ~,.~~c{, ..., iP~.._,;'~ i N PLANNtiV+~- D1ViSION EXHIBIT: F~~ ~ SCALE: ' ~~~ Rear Elevation Left Elevation Plan 2c T..~ .~ Cl'IY' OF IyEI~~i~ UCAMONGA ~ V PLANIRt~i~r" D ION TI'['LE: ;%.. "! , ,c1', .'„ N EJCHIBITc - a SCALE: asd err wra a awn •. a uxx ,.«ax vn ,u~ via. •w ~er~~v r~uwu r~_. CI1Y OF ~~~.. UCAMONGA PLAN1VtN~r- D ,ION rrcxu tievation Right Elevation Plan 3a ITEM: ~ ,U, .; , ~,; ,, -~ti N EXHIHIT:~I= l~~ SCALE: ~ S~ Rear Elevation Left Elevation Plan 3a t~ ,~ ITEM 7r Iy5~~fi ~a~/~sy~ri, CCtY OF ~ ~ ~~ UCAMONGA TTCLE: i:,,i~i~:., t~i<~,~t,.,.i,~~.. ;4y N EXktIE{1T: ~~~? SCALE: / ~ sa- i r 1.1uu u«er w I rrxcar[ rw: x1n x11xYM ±1 ~ x~xMl Ivvn _ N1YxM ~~ W'IN4 w1 w11N IInE n 111 UIIMx ~~' . fIl' OF I;~TC~t~,:~ UCAMONGA PIANRtN~r- ~ ION front Elevation -~ Right Elevation Plan 3b extt~rr; F ~ ' sc,~t.e: a s3 ~\Cal ucVapV1I Left Elevation Plan 3b ~~,,_ TTY OF ' ~~ ~ ITEM:~i ~~ ,- 7 lt~a ~,.~,:. UCAMONGA PLANIQIN(i- F7 [ON TITS: ~'• r, :+' F,,.. : N EXHtI/BIT:G SCALE:.. ~ST ilu Cu ~MII l ,y~ IYu in~v3 1 1 VI Il IICVgIIVI l Plan 3c /"'`, 'x"`~~, ITEM: ~f? ,ice i ~(,C~ ~,.,,~ _^-1TY OF FjCfi ~~;UCAMONGA Tm.E: G, . J - r , K-w ~ , ~~,. - z;1 PLANNING-„FS~ISION N EXHB[Ci ~" 'SCALE: ~ SS Right Elevation Plan 3c ~~ 'TIY OF ~ UCAMONGA PIANRtN(~- ION ITEM: %' '~r.<!^= EXH®IT: ~=' ~ SCALE: asp Rear Elevation Leh Elevation lkper Lao ~_~-yam Lq~ar lsd F'Idfl l 25 ~7& 2t2 Be / ..- ~ ~ . ~`. ~ ITEM: u so i' o , a ^ :- -f1Y OF UCAMONGA TmF: FI„>- f~,...~~- PI.ANIPtAFG- E7 ION N ' , EXHIBIT: ~-'~ SCALE: a,~~ (~~~ uM:= . ~ ; a ~-1 , E ,,`~~ ,. d^- ;_~ ~~ /s39~ IY OF ~ UCAMONGA Tm~: N ~. - ~~~, , , P -~ .; ; N PLANIP~NG;- F7 ION /,,, EXFllB~I': --:~ SCALE: ;, ... c~ J o zea+ s 3 &. Lbrary 3 1/2 Ba Upper level ~ ~~ mP-L`; ffEM: '~ ~ySC.7P ,c7A£'~-c,~ CITY OF ~„~UCAMONGA ~: r-; , Ph- . ; Fri„ ; ` N PLAN1~TtNG- FIiVl.SION EXH®IT: ' -?' SCALE: ~ asp RESOLUTION N0. 90-130 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 89-06, REQUESTING TO PNEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP FROM NO 20NING DESIGNATION 70 LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 ONELLING UNITS PER ACRE) fOR 1.94 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MiLLIKEN AVENUE AND VINTAGE DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-251-47 A. Recitals. (i) The Janes Group has filed an appl ita Lion for Development District Amendment No. 89-06 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On October 30, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. !iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 9. Resolu lion. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Pla nnina Commission of the City of Ra nchn furamnona ac Pntloww• 1. This Commiss ton hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to thfs Commission during the above-referenced pu611c hearing on October 10, 1990, inr.lud tng written and ort.l staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application aPPlies to property located at the southeast corner oaf Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive with a street frontage of 1038.41 feet and a lot depth of 848.05 feet and is presently improved with curb and gutter along Milliken Avenue and curb, gutter, sidewalk, and streetside landscaping along Vintage Drive; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Caryn Planned Community and developed with single family residences, the property to the south of that site is the vacant future Foothill Freeway right-of-way, the property to the east is designated Caryn 10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-130 DDA 89-06 - THE JAMES GROUP October 4, 1990 Page 2 Planned Community and includes existing single family detached homes and the property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential and includes single family residences. ~c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the sub stool cal evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the spetf fic findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitable for uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surround ir~g area; and (b) That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the anv irnnmant nor rtio ,~~..,..+~n+..~ .. ....+,... .-,+ (c) That the proposed district change is in .conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby ff nds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the Ca 11'o rn is Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission he ~eby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 10th day of October 1990 of Development District Amendment 89-06. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ~/ PLANNING LOMMISS [ON RESOLUTION N0. 90-130 DDA 89-06 - THE JAMES GROUP October 4, 1990 Page 3 APPROVED AHD ADO PTEO THIS 10TH DAY DF OCTOBER 1990. PLANNING COMi~i SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST , I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that .the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plann tng Commission held on the 10th day of October 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNiEL, MELCNER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~6a RESOLUTION N0. 90-131 A RESOLUTION .OF THE PLANNING COMMISS[GN OF THE CITY OF R.4NCH0 CUCPMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRALT MAP N0. 14508, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 26 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 7.94 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLI KEN AVENUE AND VINTAGE DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-251-47 A. Recitals. (i) The Janes Group has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14508 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (i i) On the 10th day of October 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the ap plira tion and concluded said hearing on Lhat date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Ines Comdnission ne reby specie tally n nos teat ail or the rat is set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon subs to nt cal evidence presented to this Commission during 4he above-referenced public hearing on October 10, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Orive with a street frontage of 1038.41 feet and lot depth of 848.05 feet and is presently improved with curb and gutter along Milliken Avenue and curb, gutter, sidewalk, and streetside landscaping along Vintage Drive; and (b) The property to *_he north of the subject site is developed with single family residences, the property to the south of that site is the vacant future Foothill Freeway right-of-way, the property to the east is existing single family detached homes, and the property to the west includes single family residences. 2-G3 PLANNING COMMISSION f )LOTION N0. 90-131 TT 14508 - THE JAMES GROUP October 30, 1990 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs ] and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: !a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; and !b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; and tc) The site is physical iy suitable for the type of development proposed; and td) The design gf the su6d iv ision is not likely to cause substantial environmental Aama ge and avo ida6le injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and ~e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and !f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now gf record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has Fnen rovi"vad anA rnneidnrod .n mnlianrn vt~F •Fe r.lt Fn rota ~nol ro....a..ral Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and coot lustons set forth in paragraphs 1, 7., 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) The GTE Svbsta Lion site (inc lud tog the' drivewayl shall become a lettered Lot "A" on the f1na1 map. J5 Thn nrn ier_• e6"71 he r~r .we N ernn• with rthe recommendations not ~theV Preliminary Noise Study. A Final Noise Study shall be submitted prior to issuance of building permits in a standard format as determined by the City Planner. Said report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation, the building materials and construction techniques Drovided, and Sf appropriate, verify the adequacy of mitigation measures Included in the building plans. 11 dtP PLANNING COMMISSION A 1LUTI ON N0. 90-131 TT :4508 - THE ,LANES ,,.,JUP October 10, 1990 Page 3 3) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deDOSit on any property. 4) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Spec iat Studies Zone for tfre Red Hill fault, i a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. Enaineeri nn Division 1) The existing overhead utilities /telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of Highland Avenue shall be unde rgrou nded from the first pole off-site east of the project's east boundary, prior to public improvement or acceptance of occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cyst for unde rg rounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 21 The developer shall pay an +n-neu *ee w Gie developer on the opposite side of Milliken Avenue as reimbursement for the landscaping of the Milliken Avenue median island from Highland Avenua to Vintage Drive prior to recordation of the final map. The fee shall be one-half the cost of the total amount of landscaping. 3) The east one-half of Milliken Avenue from the project south to Highland Avenue shall be Constructed, including sidewalks and parkway landscaping. 4) tnstall "No Stopping Any TS me" signs along the proiect frontage pn Mill!keh Avenue and Vintage Drive. 5) Parkway landscaping an Milliken Avenue shall conform to the Milliken Avenue Master Plan. 6` Landscape easements shall be provided where City landscape areas extend beyond the right- of-way line. ~! PLANNING COMMISSION R 1L UTION NC. 90-131 TT 14506 - THE 1ANE5 GRODP October 10, 1990 Page 4 7~ Radii for meandering sidewalk shalt be between 600 and 1,000 feet. 8~ Landscaping within the "Limited Use Areas" for the project intersections shall be approved by the City Engineer. 9) Since the street trees cannot be planted within 5 feet from the outside of a storm drain pipe, the street trees shall be relocated behind the sidewalk and a 6-foot-wide tree easement provided for Lots 71, 12, and 13. 10) Provide additional catch basin capacity on or near the frortta ae of lot 9 to compensate for the lack of an overflow path for the sump catch basin. 11) Only one 30 inch maximum height retaining wall is allowed within the landscape easement on the north side of Street "C." Also, the retaining wall shall be rock because it is easier to maintain (less subject to graffiti and crackingl. 12) The la ndtca De ma teriat within the areas to be policy as approved by the City Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1990. PLANNING COMB ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA ATTEST a~6 PLANNING COMMISSION R LUTION N0, 90-131 TT 14508 - THE JANES GNOUP October 10, 1990 Page 5 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do he raby certify that Lhe foregoing Re so tution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of Oc toher 1990, by the fallowing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CNITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCMER, TOLSTOY I;OES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~(O~ DF~kg D:.Qy Ay ~s~~"ia~ g tES5e=50iiYl!~~ r~~L"S`:?~F" ~'~3 ~aa~yy 8.P4~~ ~~^gX9'3 Ffi ~g g^85gg ^gD 3. _ `~ d?YC3=~f t a_ g 8 L. EDIE~YYD~g~Y~ fffp i~°L s .8'a~ya:s j[s ~= ~I*e ~~~? ~I S a "a K f;3: ~S YD-_g fig`s .gL~S '•~~ a; I~te~ xsy a~=va ~3Ig~ ~~ ESS~` 5~: e.i28 ~Da-: ~`i~ LS~+e~~ SAY yr€~E jibs !`^ -~R ~g~:~° ~_ ~i E5`t~~ _~~ ~~i~6 i~~ ' Y~sj ~sFgs aaD qs~a~ ~_~ ~„E~~s ~~ss I s ~,~is9e ~~~~ [~~~~a ~s t ~~~yf S~s '~-~~sj~k~k a~~~ x$~~~YL ~LE~'Z ~~~ s~~ ~f i8 ~i EY2€tu ~~ ~I ~ ~I Mi i `~ "~ i T ~ W I_ ~. 'rc e ~ ~~~ 1 Y . ~ .I ~ 6 B g ~~ ~ 4 ~I~I ~I ~ 9 tl s jj $L s'~ ~ m ~ ~ L ~ G ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~3~ i ~? S~, F~! $ 1 0-~ !~_ x ~ % 1 - t ! F i4 ~'^^~ f L J ` ~ 1 _. ~~ `p ~.. fl5 ~ ~ i ~~ a~ ~ W. ^O O S-= ~. ~. 'b O ~~ ~~ r fY 7E rS ae=`ri Ems" ~s~~ Aa's ~is~~s~~ E5$t Fac -s°' s ~~ x_ s'ss ~.~ i.s x~~« fi{Ya l~~~~~~i~ `•E~ gel ~iS= ~Y~ ae~~ ~59~ 's oil t~~Y Efi Y~ ~;EC 8~L 6~t :~ g'is ~i3~ i«~ESi~Fi iii. a'89s EIS Tfi ~=~~ ^r~=c ~w7 :Cog :~~^; 4_i+'~t ~~~~ $a EB j?~931r~; 'x~ _ _s: ~o~g ~~xg? ~eX~~~~~, ei5r ~~~~~ y~ai:i~ I ~ ~E iYEE _C~£ Egr g~~ : ayYt _gg~ ~ ~_ ° { 3 g ~ ¢ ~ a~ g 8 {•• . 1 3 ~ ~~~aia~ Yf° a ~~~! ~ i ~ = g..~~~E 3 ~ C ~L ~ ~~ !I ;ii~ is~ E a~-'" ~ E- fair ~Ye ~ ~is 3e ;~ e rEat r9=z 'I~ . ~ ~ g !'i~ c s i~ ll~;~ - , st'a ~ i si ~ ~ €~~{= zry as~ ;e fi ~ Li ~1 <~ s5 ~I ~ ~ ~I issi SQ 8.r E~~ t B~' S. L~ ~i1 L ~ I ~~ -~ i i`r & ir'1t ~ 3~ ~3 ~ 3= 7 f r E1 _ s ~ t { ~y :sg~ et {1 a-' i~ _r°_g YI i i ~3~ ~s ~ f'!~3 :3 :b =~~= yy E " ~~~~ s? ~a~ ~ ,, ?~i 3a .s . ~ -~ c Isi ~~ ~ i 1=- 8a - E i¢~~~~1~ 'sci. Y e~.s_. .. ~.i3~ L~ _a 6 E `~ 3~ :L FS oS _~ ~ii~il ~s 3~3_:~ k ~ir~E~_jji_ -i-r' Ik i53~~1[;~ ~C,s: j g~lLC ~~ ! 1 yi~rifi i1t~, 1 ~ ~YZ~:!t r ~_~~ "r~ ~i~lis~i~z ~rti i it=~'.g;4~ gr :Z Ya"sii~i~ diE~ ~~ '~ '~ Q _ oa 7 0 O C d ~a= - ~~~~c i4 ~~ ^C~akk !':SE ~1°~ 63 T~S ~ ~i~~si ~ ia3 ~s s i~i_3 ~g~i.; $ SItE~~ ~~~~_~ is d_ .I$ -~ a~~ ie:k ;b E 8E ~~ `SEeS_J~ C•g r~ € ~: 3~ES 3E i as 'g 3€e6~id~g~= ~~pss s SaY~a p_ : C x;xs SN ss _E Ex~;~"s,~`tga~ ~~g?s = nag"a oc "s?g z" gg Y~ ~~~ -g~sgi T~F~Y i ~ s Y. ~ ~a~e ti~a z~ ~~, =R Fl:eveF~"as E~Ea~ ~~ g=s~ o ao;_ ." -` -~~~ "-as~~r~ Es5~5 !~ i~$`e$FTf FF SsY$- i~ ~6e~ ~O N_,8 XL8 .~ 5Fg ~~ a ~'R-8 $6 i'=E i,~Ngi E: ~_; S11 7g~R rI~ '~ Ei% Y~ r~~y~s~Fs"s; t3~is d~ =€ie •< w Z :kE gET~ ~~'~P ~. ~'s~d ai 3z ~ r $iii ~F =ei lsE~~: g~% r~~' iE ~~ s ~'~ d~:3 gs ~rD E~s~„x ~~s ~:FS = 3' gt $ ;'s _Ef$~, a 's~jd ate!-s.. ,, si -.~ ~_~~, gr~g y~ra a $. i~$ a ~_ BLy; tM Yet= =xsii9r~ $?" 3 ra x ;E ~'~F ° aj= 3y` i~ '~ ~ri~ ~$' yEa-(( r.:EI:eE :'s .: a ~ <.: P~$ :° .a ~sfaF fo~ :diF a~~d'asa ~! ~~ = -I ~I ~I I NI Sg~C fit- F Iii! ~u~h~ Y ". ~. ~ s ~ E-.a ~ ~ e as _-t2S ~~.~ ~; ~ ~ ski ;;~'~ less ~a~ y 3~~c ~#~ti ~~~ ~ 'a - ~ pia a~~ s/~~ -at ~ 3~~0 ~~~t~ ~ 3~ s ~~ o "fie 5~~ ~EP.~ S~ =3a~i i } h figs '~~ ~s~i fi's ~ t Y tESS~ t"~;j - sr S_ s ~s "ax~ ~~esa gs: ~ g3:s }DY~c~$£ Ski?= ~ a ale' ~sa~ ~~~s 3ecai a-s.6 a ~~W~ Fi?~:3t F~#~a\E ~ ~CCa M ~ ^I g ~ ~ ^I 1 3 - 3 : - C ~.~~ U` Vii=` ~ ~ ~ a-o; s'~ saes $t ~e3 S 'i 8~8 igse ~ i ~ s°'~ i~E `acY 3~ ~~i ~ cY ~=~ ._€z ~ e saa ~ ~~ee ~` ~~ Y ~i s9 a~rr F z i ~a8.~y~, z i~~~ ~~ ash ~f ir. x~+~ ~3~} = a" ~ tFS~~s~= -E y~yi$~ ~_t ;!r _ ji~ ~srx ?~ ~' r = F~Y~6~R a ~' i' 6i Y'o ESG i~§t 'a'we ~ ~ ~~~-~ ~ML ~ f i ~ ~ SS Z=~~ ~"3~ - ~ t ~=jt=~3 ~ ~-~~= irr ~~A c s~ 3 ca , ~~s!E ~i ~ ~ ~:°~ a ': d~a;x iii ~~e~ i ~_ ~~z F~~e ~! ~ ~I ~ ~I ~~ ~I TI !I ~I 'f ~I ~'l/ u V 546 S fi89• ~ - " 5 b E~~ a^€3i6 ~,i~ s a~ s ~I ' s°6Ee F - Ye=- a ~ ~k. "YEeEE k~i w ~ ~ 5~ T E88o E ~~ Ekfi ~fi:a 3 35 S_ b L ~., rl "~~'fi 5 ~§~"~. p a'~ =ESS=~ as. ~ ` V I Ik e = = Y.=a ~3 EE ~` ~°~6 :r~ ~~et=g a~~. ~~ ~~i ~ fii 6i :? ~ s 3~~i~ eg ,-g Y "k °JtI: -'qEV fi L ~t~~ si "a i z t ;i 5t ~L1SF ~E og~i aa4-gs"z s -~"° c• 5 "s 's 's s ! is s3-"; i; °`r= ip5~:s~ i4~~ 5[ s s s s :~ ~ x. _~~# ~,~ ~ai„ <. as. a s ~1~~ "ai S ~= ~ 2~ ~C;3~_ c3 ~ ~ ~I ~ 'i VI ~I ~E 6€ r - go _e ~4 Ed 3 jF _! 6 ~3 EF s5 a~ 3e t; ~r xe i; s~ 8~ S~ C" i_ % Y~ _a ~~ ?k ~! :3 cL :k r~ s- : ~; d3 i'g~ F'E ~~ ~aJ W~~ ~n 58~ ~ ei'!S ks Ls~ ~ dyYd FF Ya - fifi5~ €°. y~~ ; -4lIE 'fi R~~~ ~~ °fa s s a~=~ i~ ~~"=~ ~F ~~!i YFI L~a~i ~i ~~~5 iE a ~~ *5 Y as E; "~~ss ~~ +j~:+~ 3i 5s;~ ~4 ~b~~~ ~i 3E aeis ;3 ~~~iF~ i~ "i ~i 'i ~ ~ ~- ~ d .. s FkY~ ~cas ~~: Fa ~ S~JI s p %Ei! ~ 5~ fSSi t b L ~ ~ ~ ` ~~ t i ~y! ~6=~i~ , E ~ ISS~t ~ Y! j ' ~as i~ d .. T~pisSS{{!!t l_S ~ ~~°t -k9~ ' ~ L iii 5 i k S: "t 5if~ III i f Y ~~ ~ ° yY~w~ ~it~a_ ~~~E E ~Ei-' b s " E'7~ ss d' Es• E F3 i=~ :i ~i :i a ~a ~. .~Qa LU 0 o~ p L w sear a: sF ~ s x-sa• ..F. Fg =~~ r a-== ~ . - : ~ s " ~3ss 3 € gig" $; ~ _ ~h 5~~5 ~~ pai ~ ~'~ ~E S` 5 a sr_ . __ ~ "F ~.= " ~~ a d fag aE v I. ?=se s°' c?g 3 ~= ~FS3 ~ y ~ ' sV fi iz~ ss -o ~~ ~s'"s =e off? s ~~ ga•as _ ; ~ ~, ~S _ i p ~~~ gZe fins s ~~ ~s€ ~ 2 ~~ ` e ~g s xj~ s$ o ~~~~ a a eg „ 3 r gsis; Fs ~~ g a f" g``5 - aeM ~ i~ ~g~fi ~ ~s i? aY S ag. sa "e e [ cn~t g= g F :~ a.. ass; 3g g- z~ a sg s -g, ?~ ~- e~ a5 is a c_ s E~~a t~ sa r5 ~ £~ a _~ 3Y' as°s`c ~'a cxs" .,. a~ W_ e~ a ~i g ds ~ ;TY <€ .. ~N"W ~ of al ~ '~ ~ -I ~ ~ o -I ~I ~I •I a~ s ~~ x :g S EY ~: 7. 8 ~S t~ ~ gi i Y~ d~ a9 ¢ ~ !' ~~ ~;~ _ S _` ~ Ld ~; ~ : Y - _ - "a ~s j~ die __"aa - i j £g ~ - S ~ ~ ! a ~ ~I ~~~ ~ ~ : c a~ 33i ~~ i sa g~ ~i &= g~~ 6~~ ai_ -is ~Fj jFE ..a 1~3 ..r = :~t o F3 ~p~ f~:5 =a~~~ 5? s~: a~~ ~ ~^_-« g is af i 8~~ gs °i"{ z Iy g3~ g iY S~ iqq' :Y r I 'e yly~ i[~ i==~T Ys t~~c ~_ ~ rF- ass gY; `~~ r ~ ~ a ;- ~dS a e p~F ~i~ -~ ~T{~ i ~~~i tt i i ~~~ i3 ~ Fix .tS ~~ ~ a ~~ «~ j >S ~~ &s 1t~ o L 1~ 8 r ~3 ~~ a: _~ .F `5~ ~__ fed f?X n i Fa ' bs oa _ Yg ~ g8 N O ~o O 5VS C F~8 ~ F !~~ a E g . ~_Y F~3 _~: ~~ ies r:BD cep` g '~€!C~ €~ '~`f P? ?~at e a ~ ~3E~~ E= 30~ a~ xs.~ ~ ~, ~' je 6t ~ry~ ~' r [f s~ i~e~ 5._i ~~~ii rE s3~ aa= _g ~Y ;E~ ^ n ~# 5 3r~B ~1a~; s 3~~~ ~~~~ 3? g~~ ~i ~i i ~~' ~~ a~.s ~"e <rIE .z ~I .I ~ ~I ~C«II ~?9 r S E Z $$~ 8 EE d s . ~~~ _ % ~ [ : ~ ~~ ~ s s . '. ~ C S =e o ~ Y~ i= ~ ^ ~ ~ s ~~~~ ~ z ~ ~~ :t'~ ~ si I~ ^ jib ~ ~ ~ ~ ; i ~ [ ~ ~ aF a ~ [ i~ 1 T~ _ 5 ~I ~ _ i ~I e~= ~e 50 S 3 ~58 ae, ~. ~S~ E~d Y~ gsi ~~M °9 s~k as; 3_°- - ~~~ ~~~ sr ~_ s« ~~~ ~~ "s-" tea= g` ies ._ r k•• ~za e~ 6~+ gY° 7 ~ e;~ g#-~I~ ,~F Ear i~Ss sas 8~i ~I ~I ~I a~~ RESOLUTION N0. 90-132 A RESOWTI ON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN REV iEN FOR TRACT N0. 14508, A RESIDENTIAL SUB OIV ISION OF 26 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 7.94 ACRES OF LRND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLI KEN AVENUE AND VINTAGE DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225-251-47 A. Recitals. (i) The .lanes Group has fit ed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 14508 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the apDl ice Lion." (ii) On October 10, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts ,C. ~.., ~„ ,.. ,~~c oc..~w. , ai t n, of iiiia newiu Liun are True mru Cur rec L. 2. Based upon substantial evidence Dres ented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 10, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Comnlssi on hereby specs ffcally finds as follows: (a) That the proposed pro,j ect is consistent with the obj,~c Lives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located: and (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the Conditions applicable thereto, will not be detr}mentai to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in,iurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Cammisston hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attachod hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ~J PLANNING COMMISSION F 7L UT ION N0. 90-132 OR FOR TT 14508 - THE JANES CROUP October 10, 1990 Page 2 Planning Division 1) The proposed retaining wall along the easement shalt be eliminated within 15 feet of the street right-of-way and replaced with landscape mounding and shrubbery. 2) All retaining walls within 15 feet of a front property line shall be eliminated. Instead, grade differentials between lots shall be taken up gradually in the front yard area with undulating mounds. 3) All driveways shall be necked down to a maximum width of 16 feet, as measured at the driveway approaches. 4) The retaining wall wf thin the future City maintained areas, the north side of Street "C", shall be faced with natural river rock. 5) The gable on the garage side elevations of all plans shalt be completed to achieve a more finished appearance. Data ils of this condition shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Caamittee on a Consent Calendar ha atc nri nr to tHn t<cuanro of building permits. 6) The base element (rock, brick) shalt wrap around the side elevations to the return wall locations on all applicable plans. 7) All chimneys should be treated as to match the base element of each plan type (example: a wood sided house with a Drick base should have a brick chimney). Since Plan 28 has no base element, either a rock or brick material could be used on the chimney. B) The existing block watt on the south property line Qf iei ^A" aha71 De SLOCCOed t6 match proposed stuceo freeway sound wall and existing perimeter walls for adjacent tracts. 4) Lot A shall be landscaped and the driveway shall be consistent with the neighborhood. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. ~ 76 PLANNING COMMISSION R LUTION N0. 90-132 DR FOR Ti 14508 - THE JANES GROUP October 10, 1990 Page 3 Enaineerina Division 1) All apDl icab le conditions from the Resolution for Tentative Tract 14508 shall apply. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF OCTOBER 1990. PLANNING ISS ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Nas duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comm ssfon held vn i.iic iv iii Jny ui uc LUOCr ilYV, oy Lne 70110Ning VOCC-te-N1L: AYES: COMMISS[ONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS; NONE ABSENT: COMM [SSIONERS: NONE /7 aE~s[nfn: x~x ;;t. Iyaflcx_x3~ "t =E 3 t~~~~3~?~irV ~~ij~ 1=~a '~~e-4~d ~ s_S tg=~~~i~5~~a ~a~ a 4 ~~'-yia~Yie3 "x~~F -Yy~iFar;ti i ~ ~~a=~~.~~:~ss ~~~~ _ °:'8-~"~:~ IMF j~~ AR ka~~~ ac D € ~y3 , i S: hfi '~y:=~i 3~ "x a s 3.: y tY~e=i~4~ - '_~i F~~II~s~E:-a di~~ ~~ C 7 Y~ P 2 ~ i + ~ ~ t. ~ ~ "' ~ i~ ~ - C 4 a~ +<~ .. t, ~ ~ W ca I' " „fie ~S F i :p ~~~ TTL~ t[i ~!j :~~ r~ isa ~'~I 1~! p=r d~c i~3 ~I ~ ~~~ ~s= :~d SpY ~.. ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ s~~~ ~s ~i ~~ ~ __ `~ ~ a a~ ~ y .r e ~;i~ F i F i ~ ~ra r ~ - ~ ~~ ~ y3 j Y ~ ~_I ~~~ ~`y $~ L_ p t! ~ [~,~ ~~ ~3E ~rt'~ ~~ ~ y ~~ ~~ 2 ~~ s s ~ yy a ='s ~ ` ~ R~ ~ L tl 3 i l f G. ~I ~74 ~~~ A~1 h O 0 1~` .O ,~ o ~tsj ~~~ ~~~, ~g~tt~ t$Y ~t.~~-$!C 1 sf~i ~s~g ~~ai;~'~~? j Y_~ ~L~L~ ~~taf~~~Tl~ ~caF ~il~ 3s'~'i~~~" {{ a a ana ~sd~ ~~~~ gY$~ ~LY: i at is~3n ~~LY~~ ;~~3;~ E3sf :7$cl ~~~lY $$l DES 7~8S ~ i ~ l~i~ ~~ air ss_ a~ a ~F~3 ; :sc 3~,a ~ ? rya: ~4 s~$ ~~~ ~! =i tB t ~ j3 '_ ~~~ ja $; j; ~a=~ ~ ss~ °_~ si ;i sass ~: ~za ~i: ~s ~°{{ 3ana as ~{1E ti j5j ~I :saz ~c $~ i~E f{ rr ~3 : t -s a _aa s}i ~~ i $ ~~ =jY $1 ~ $as a s s ~ra~z ~ t ~~ ! t~a~e ~ _~ .~jiL a$t ` z 5~~~ 1 5c a'i s ~ "xi $s ash ~~3~ s~ ~•~~ ~ $_a~ tt t~'= ~= D al' $a I as ~t~ s Ji~~ ~I ;a~ ~ ~~k'' s= a ~ _e g ~~ss ~_ z; _~~~ ;~ hi~D ~~ a~ ~sr i~ ~E~i~ as rr~D~pp ~ ~'iSE~ r; 3_Fi !t .~ia5 ~~~ ~i ~ ~ ~I =$=$~ i~~~ #~Y~a ts. 5 ~~~~ ?~~rtt . ~l1~ l~~~a° a ~ 9 ~,l e_t~ yLLL a'7 ~:a~t~ fr:1 i ~srs?: $$~~~o ;$_ ~. as;Fi ~~iy_ ~~.:6 ICI Io 0 I~ c a ~ sa:: :: -s"_ rs q 5 s " i; ~ ~ ~, 0 ~ ~~~° ~ij dz 3 ~ s i 3= , ~. e '33t - ~ I $ a~ ~s ai ~ .a E ~YS z " sI 6 ~; x~ k i ~~ ' R i~r : €$ I = €} ss~ t sI =at tzi "a fir' ~i 1~>R €1! sz i~8 s ~ ~~ ff 4~f sx c ~~~r ~~~ a tp '~ , E"~. ~3 ~~ ~~~ .;i izE~E AEI' :~ ° ~ ! €~ -" .s i i:af~l~~r"t ?iii==Fart ~F~t~s~s~i; ~ -I ~I VI ~I ~I ii 3rr :a- ii r: ii I ~" k ~ - D I~ D ~~~ a~~i ~ LY ~~ ~ tj ~L~L a-s ~;{'s - i3 ;j i }: E$ji ~' a~i~ I t F~ - .~ ;tiii .~ qq ! -~a 8- ~~ s iE i=°r ,Y~ e3=}' i 3: iii . ~e ia!; r~ d ~e~ -1~ s ~ s~ t ;D~ rC ~S Y !ai ~F ~ ~C ~ C iii ~pl= de's =~~ ~~ iF ~~~F~ 5'a is :...i 2 i4 i:.:i 1a ~I ~I F I ~I -I -I MI ~ c ~ ~ es t ~~ ° $ ~e ~ D Y ~ f~s : 4 ~gF;; =' -has =ra.: s"" i~ ~°fa i it =F i3 is" " ~ ~i~ i sF i ~ r .i;~` 1~ r'si~ ~~ ~n tilili ~ { -s ~~ t "a~~ s ' i' " F L'a~,i a Fliii : rr tt; ais;;i c5 psi I '' !ia ;s }3a Fi - s~ !iF =€'~r€ i3~~ 3=;~~t. ~L" 7g iE'~ CS Bq~fC -~ ;t s siti;t~ ~= ~,~~ __,xl:i ~!a s}}s[[ r-a~i~t tzF ~#[f 'ai~iaat ~~ 0 ~~ .a = _ i3z g~ {ss~ a 0 tig ~~: sy~ e~ 1 ~ps ~~~ i~ia ~~~ f T ;w; ~ ik ~}}~~ i~ s a~ I~. ~i~ i~~ is~~ ~~i D 3C. ~ _ ~~4 g~~ ~~~ j,i°~ ~~~ 3t- iii sS~~ .i" ~e ,~e ~ a: fY~ S~~ ~~~ti~ ~~~ -i~ .rci '-;ice s-~ i' : E ~~~L 'it ~~~! ~ ~s_ r~z~iEa~;r ~s fir i~``t~ ~~~~ f~~l~ itL ~~ 6~~ ~~ ~ ~I i;rr iii ~~~_ ~~ 0 rt iii i e e~ ~zt ~~~ i ~ r i '~ 4 ~ 5 s' = l~ ;~i ~ p` ;iD ~,p~ !~~ sti as~e ;~~~ ~i~` is ii s~~d ~~ -I ~; s;~= :r i~ ~~sf ~' tQQg ~T~~ d i k~ ~~ ~ =S = ~~ a- :bi a s= ii ~sE3i i i~ ;s tii~ i ~ js ~~idy= E t„ t 7 ~I ~ ~ ~I "s~ss ij es %i~i 3~ ~i=~ j se ;s ~ ~;~s ~s `is p e ~" ~ s 1~~~ ~ sYd -; _ r i 3° i j, ~I-€ ~ ~~ss 's~ ~Yi s i~8ia ~; -°~i~ a a~ E~~ P f ~ i~~i ~ ih i is i8 .=i z ~~ y~ ~~ ~~ ~. 'o 0 s z - ;~~ _~ ~~~ ~ i= ~ Y ~f 5t2 ~t ~_ ~ii! s~ aj'~ tt3fi i~ tsC~ z s;a -c ;~ Uzi s~#f`` ~C ~a t e yAC fit ~ ~~~ ~g~ V ~ ~ N 0 °p=ps l~fs='~ ~s 3 ; !~ gas! ; is ~sss^~ ~i~ s._ s s ~ •s_"~. _,.. ts. _ a '~rs~~e si = t i : s ~ ~sse ; • ~i ~ - ~ _ ~ ~- _~~ ~~e31i~ i s~ 3' s~ 3' e~ i" s - ~ ~ 1tF~ ~i' ~ f I I ~i ~~ ~~ ~n~~~i i3 ~+ r b O ~•n 1 gs ~= r _~ !s i ±_ ~_t [s ~; .S i F~ ~~ 3i f; -r !~e ~~ s~ a o~ a" ~~ `~ ~~ 3s 1 =_ _ ~e :'s ag ss r~~ ~t i~ Wi! W~~ ~~ ~~ •I s as~ ~ s"ls ~~ s i i~rs iaa gi~y =BAS ~ ~iLt i~jj5 S v- s~i j ;~=1.: r~ ~ ~ ryt ~ti t s{ ;~ i~ z~~~~ ~! ~ i sr ~ sF is! r 5 s 8 ;~ i~yt ; ~a'~ - Ipa •t ~?~~ ~~ ~~~~ 3j i~ ~ Ei~~~ 's3~ s r-~ ~.~ 's'!t 3 !~~# n~ ~° ~~ 1'" _' E d~jd~ Mils A F aiii :3 ~~ i5 E~ d~ : s-~• s ~ ®1 ~~~ I~ O x YQ~Y •~ ~p~ ~ ~ l~ _ ~ ~ Ems' 8~ .l'~ 1. 3~~r dr s~~ ~ ~~ ;rgips ~ - P# i' r 's#~ "ss ~ gi~~ s~ i=P n ~~ ~~tfs ~ j rb ~s ~ s ; 9 `~.~~r F; ~€s s .~ ~ 1! ~ it 3 ip~ s~3 ~~ !it 3 1" ~ gib €t E ~ ~ ~i 3 y~~ ~i ~-°E° f ~~~ s 6s ~s~s~ ~ ~> ~ ~ i3 ~ -!~ Es d~~~ i~ ~£~ i r~ ~sP~~ j is ~ ' ~ i ~~ ~~ FG= r _S ip i~sE ~ ar ~,~ ~~€ n t. ~~ is t~ ~ ~ i x~;~ ~Y Bs$ ~~ SE °~~~~~ #€ 3j zt ~ iY E ~i~ ~~ seE3: -a 'c~3 <s r_ eS:fes a~ ~i ; dS _ d~~~ ~~~ ., el ~ ~~ ~ r~ ~ ~ F „~ ^~ •~ S ~ 6! ti' ~ S SP ti j !~ ~ S L= S= i~ _ ~ _ jj !~ ~ !~ ~ ~E 3~ g r!6 ij: 's •^ i Y s S! ti y'1 Sf s ~~: s~ r r~E ij ~~~ ~~ ~ . :'a~ W~ ail .c i a . ~ ' ~ i • p ~ b ~ !k ~i A! ~~ jk jVi Ejit '!~E _j ;E~ 1 ~~~ ~r = ;~~ ~ir ~.lg ^pp~~~= i~. S~ S;~t F- i ; i ! r~t:r 1~ i~~ Y~2i.^ 1 ;,? ~ . a. s5~'~s ! _ p~;~a ~~ `c~a s1~~'!~ ,Ed ~,~a~3 f~ J1 ~^ a 3~ _F: e4 j _ lS ~~LCC j~ e ~i F!E ~~PI fF -r{~{ ®~ -' ~it `°ti 3; d-; o _~: o ~ ~ ,r_, I~r ,~ ~z'f K :~ 9=s L~~ ~s3 (s, C ~'~ ~ a~~ :t tda ivE r.E~ a=f r~ ~~z r s s ~r_ ; ss ~ c(d Sit ~ t~~ 'a ~ ~ r3! ~~€~ ~~ ;g !ic~ ~= ~ y s ~ ~ ~ ~s~ ~i~ ~d ~~ 7fta ~-Y ~ p~ ~ ~ ~ `^ d f 3 ~~ dt Y ~~ fr 3 ~ a ~ ~ _. : , s_ sF gg E i~ ~" a i~ fes~ ~;~~, D is ' ~=i''c ,~ sia ;a~ ~t B ~, ~ ~~ sf-s -~ ~ t'~ pp r~ is F s != a ~ I ~ #~ ~~ ~ ~~~ f3 i-~ Y - .~ d_ c...f tic Eti c _ _ ~i ~I ~ it ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~I ~I I ~! ~ ~~ ORDINANCE N0. ( ~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALlFORNI A, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT N0. 89-06, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT'S MAP FROM NO ZONING DESIGNATION TO LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 7.94 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED P,T THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF M[LLIKEN AVENUE AND VINTAGE DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. (i) On October 10, 1990, the Planning Coimniss ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development District Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-130 thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Development District Amendment No. 89-06. (ii) On November 7, 1990, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing; and (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have. oc curreA. "o. Crd finance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ordains as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds as follows: a. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; and h, The nnnpe,nd ~Te.,dmCnt will --t `ue u'etY imei,tdl iU the public health or safety or cause nuisance or significant adverse environmental impacts; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with the applicahle provisions of the Development Code and City standards; and ~`-~ CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. DOA89-O6 - THE JANES GROUP November 7, 1990 Page 2 d. The property is suitable for the use proposed as it has been designated as Low Residential on the General Plan Land Use Map; and e. The proposed use is compatible with existing and future land uses in the area as land to the north, east, and west contain single family detached residences; and f. The site will have adequate access to accommodate the proposed use, with connections to existing coilec for and arteria', streets _..^.d internal roadway improvements. SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Gevelopment District Pmendment 89-06 adopting a development designation of Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for the property ~ located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive. ~ .~ SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published with 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Vallev Cailv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published fn the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. i~ ~~ I ~ ~~ CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCA*dONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 TD: Mayor and Ftemhers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lori L. Moore, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRO FAtENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL DLAN AMENDMENT 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA - A request to amend the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan, in conformance with Catifo rn is Health and Safety Code Section 25135.7 !c`, to incorporate, by reference, the San Bernardino County Fla za rdous Waste Management Plan, as approved by the California Department of Health Services on June 15, 1990. RECOMMENDATION: On October ?0, 1990, the Planning Commission recommend ed that General Pla r, Ame rdrfent 90-02A he approved by the City Council. If the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declara tior, would he .., u YYr r. .-._. BACKGROUND: In March 1981, pursuant to the Tanner legislation ~Ag 2948, 7985?, the County Board of Supervisors authorized the preparation of the San Bernardino County Draft Hazardous Waste Management Plan (CHWMPI. The Citizen Pdvisory Committee, assisted by the County Department of Environmental Health Services staff and the interagency Technical Advisory %Ommlttee, prepared the CHWMP, Over the past three years, the City's close participation with the County in the deveiopme nt of the Plan is evidenced with Cou ncilmember Charles J. Buquet's efforts as a member of the Citizens Advisory Committee, and City staff's input Ch rough service on the Technical Advisory Committee. ~~r May iii iQRQ, Ciw lily Referral BO _n2 was pra 5nnted LO the Planning Commission requesting a review of the Revised Draft CNwMP and subsequent recommendation to the City Council for approval. On May 17, 1989, the City Council apDrov ed the Revised Draft CHWMP in conformance with AB 2948 (Tannerl by passing Resolution No. 89-234. Dn February 5, ?99D, the County Board of Supervisors adopted the final C FhIMP, and certified the Environmental Impact Report fE1R1 and subsequent P,ddendum to the EIR, CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANC h'0 CUC PMONGA Navember 1, 1990 Page 2 On February 26, t990, the State Department of Health Services !D HSt notified the County that the CMJMP was in "substantial compliance with the Department's Guidelines," Tanner legislative provisions, and had therefore been approved. Gn rune i5, i990, the State UHS notified the City that the CHWMF had been approved, and explained that the City must act within SSO days to implement the plan acto rd ing to California Health and Safety Code ~H&SC~ Section 25135 Jrct. General Plan Amendment 90-02A went to the Planning Commission on October 10, 1990. The Commission recommended approval to the City Council. Staff recommends incorporating the applicable portions of the approved CHWMP, by reference, into the City's General Plan. The ISO-day action period ends in December 1990. Specifically, implementation action will require City Council approval of a General Plan Pmendment by Resolution no later than December 5, 1990. Staff recommends the following amendment to the current language (see Exhibit "0" of the attached Planning Comm ssion Staff Report -Exhibit "1"~ of the Liquid and Solid Waste Facilities portion of the Public Facilities Sec *_ion of ±he General Plan !py. Ill - 6S, para. 6i: The State (Health and Safety Code, Section 25135, et. seq.) has identified hazardous waste as a rlasc of ma*o.;,t~ special land use planning, use regulation, and ~d ispo sal regulation. UnAer tqe }awi the 8ennty ei SaR 8ernarAine Bepartment of Envirenmenta3 Hea}th 5erviees is preparing a leeai ila ea rdevs caste MaRagernent Dian whieq Twst he appreveA by the State Bepartmenf Rf }lealtp Serviees anA by 58A of the 6ities wi to 5B~ of the pa pu }a ti en iR tpe 6eaR ty by dune 26f 1998: 7pe 6ity of Ra ne he 8veanrenga is partiei pa ting in the Aevelep~ne nt of the 6eunty Na ea rA ens Waste Management P}a n. In co~pliance with these State legislative provisions, the San Bernardino County Wzardous haste Management Plan, has been adopted by the County Board of Supervisors (February 5, 1990) and is he*eby Tncorporated by reference. !Note: Strike-through indicates deleted language; bold type i nd ira roe „ew 1'n^yUa ^y2.~ If additional details are needed, please refer to the attached Planning Commission Staff Report !Exhibit "1"!, FACTS FOR FI NOI NGS_ Based on the conclusions listed in the attached Planning Commission Staff Report of October l0, 1990, and Resolution No. 90-133, the City Council can make the following fi r.dirgs regarding this application: ~g CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUC AI40NGA November i, 1990 Page 3 ;. The County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (CHWMP~ comprehensively and adequately addresses hazardous materials and waste management issues, as evidenced by the State Department of Health Services' approval; and 2. The City adoption of the CHWMP will occur during the 180-day State mandated action period ending December 5, 1990, a5 required by California Health and Safety Cade Section 25135 ,7 (c~; and 3. Tne proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor surrounding properties, as demonstrated by the findings and conclusions of the initial study; and 4. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the. General Plan, as established by the consistency with existing objectives and policies in the Public Facilitf es Section of the Land Use and Development Element. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Ya 11ev Gaily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing. e,CTrON: If ±he City Council concurs with the retomme ndation of the Planning Commission for approval of General Plan Pmendment 90-02A (see Exhibit "2"?, the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Neaa tive Deela ra tion would be appropriate. //R(espec ly subm' ed, / 3ra er City Tanner BB:LM/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "1" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated October '.0, 1990 exhibit "o" - Pesclutfo^. ryj, on_7?? RecommenA;ng App royal of GPA 90-02A Resolution of Approval ~~9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October l0, 1°90 ~~ T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission V FROM: brad Buller, City Planner G~h Lori L, Moore, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: EN4IRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan, in conformance with California's Health and Safety Code Section 25135.7 /c`, to incorporate by reference the San Bernardino County Hazardous Waste Management Plan, as approved by the California Department of Health Services June 75, 7990. I, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Citywide; applicable to applications for the siting of hazardous waste facilities, as well as hazardous materials and waste management activities. II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASS SESSMENT: Staff has compieted their environmental assessment and has found that no significant adverse environmental impacts would occur as a result of the proposed adoption of San Bernardino Countv's Hazardous Waste Ma nanmm~nr oi~„ ~ruuwo~ Th;s determination is based on staff's concurrence with the findings of the environmental analyses completed by the County /the lead agency for the environmental review for the CHWMP, The environmental analyses Consisted of the preparation of a Program Environmental Impact Report 'EIR1 and a subsequent Addendum to the EIR for the Plan, in accordance with the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA?, Both the EIR and the Addendum, certified by Lhe County Board of Supervisors on February 5, 7990, provide the basis for CEQA compliance when each of the County's 20 cities consider app rova'. of the CHWMP, The CHWMP is not meant to he a site-specific action and will not have any direct effects or unavoidable significant adverse impacts n fhn nyirCnment. The Pidn mr re iy c<tahlichec preg ra mg and policies for safe ma nayement of hazardous materials and wastes. The Plan aims to protect public health, safety, and welfare, and the environment, and to assist the public, government, and husinesses in making the transition away from reliance on land disposal of untreated hazardous wastes, as required by State and Federal laws. The Program EIR and Addendum prepared by the County thoroughly evaluated the overall impacts of the CHWMP at a broad, poliry level, and established guidelines for future site-specifl c activities pursuant to the San Bernardino CHWMP, a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMONGA October 10, !990 Page 2 The future activities in the program, such as facility siting and construction, will be addressed through separate environmental rev iew~si, in order to provide CEQA compliance on a project- specific basis. These reviews will most likely take the form of Pre ject EI Rs which examine the environmental impacts of a specific development project and the site-specific impacts. Design standards intended to minimize or mitigate impacts would he -- `!'she" is °~m;•+;,,g the rpoSt rurrinn of any hazardous materials Vand ,waste management fzc ilities. Therefore, the predominant impacts of the CHWMP will be beneficial to public health and safety. II1. BACKGROUND: Plan Hi sto ry In !986, in response to a push for waste minimization and alternatives to landfill dispo Sal of untreated hazardous wastes, as well as a heightened awareness of local and regional hazardous materials and waste management needs, the Tanner legislation !AB 29481 was produced. This legislation is designed largely to be instrumental in the siting of nece55a ry hazardous Waste facilities in the State. It also enables estabiishment of a comprehensive planning process for management of hazardous materials and wastes at the County level, and reflects the change ir. regulatory policies to an emphasis on local control. in ma rcn i9o%, pu rauani :o urc ~ tyi - '~: Ccc r. `; Board of Supervisors authorized the preparation^~of the San Bernardino County Draft Hazardous Waste Management Plan ~CHWM Pi, The Citizen Advisory Committee, assisted by the County Department of Environmental Health Services !DENS! staff and the interagency Technical Advisory Conmittee, prepared the CHWMP. The City worked closely with the Citizen Advisory Committee and the County through Cou ncilmember Charles J. Buquet's efforts as a member of the Citizen Advisory Committee and City staff's input through service on the Technical Advisory Committee throughout the Plan's development. On Feb rue ry 16, 1988, the City Council reviewed and commented on the preliminary draft CHWMP in an informal workshop with County Sidff, In April 1489, after receiving extensive review and public comment on the Plan via public hearings and technical meetings, the County sent the Revised Draft CHWMP to the cities in the County for formal review, comment, and approval. On May 10, i989, County Referral 89-02 was presented to the Planning Commission requesting a review of the Revised Draft CHWMP and subsequent recommendation to the City Council for approval, ~/ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 10, 1990 Page 3 On May 17, 1989, the City Council approved the Rev iseA Draft CHWMP in conformance with AB 2948 !Tanner) by passing Resolution Go. 89-234 /see Exhibit "A"1. On February 5, 1.990, the County doa rd of Supervisors' adopted the Final CHWMP, and certified the EIR and subsequent Addendum. On February 25 '900, the Sta ie "ue pa rtment of Healtn Services /DHSS notified the County that the CHWMP was in "substantial compliance with ±he Department's Guidelines" and Tanner legislative provisions, and had therefore beer approved. On June 15, 1990, the State DHS notified the City that the San Bernardino CHWMP had been approved, anA stated that the City must act within 180 days to implement the Plan according to ore of the following responses required under California Health and Safety Code (H6SC) Section 25135.7 !c~: Adopt a City hazardous waste management plan containing zll of the elements required by subdivision /d) of Section 25135.1 which shall be consistent with the approved CHWMP; Incorporate the aool icablP portions of *.he appreved County Plan, by reference, into the City's General Plan; Enact an ordinance which requires that all applicable toning, sues tvtston, conditional use permit, and variance decisions are consistent with the portions of the a pp rc ved County Plan which identifies general areas or siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Staff recommends response A2, whereby *.he applicable portions of the approved CHWMP are incorporated by reference in Lhe City's General Plan, The i80-day action period ends ir. December 1990, Specifically, implementation action will require City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment zo later than December 5, 1990. Plan Summa rv The following is a brief nverv iew of the clan /a - opv CHWidP'> Executive Summary is included in the Planning Commissioners' packs CSi. The CHWMP provides policies and proposals to comprehensively manage the County's hazardous materials and wastes. The Plan identifies the types and amounts of wastes generated in the County; establishes programs for managing hazardous waste; sets forth a framework for facility siting; and identifies goals, policies, and actions for the long-term management of hazardous materials and wastes in the County. ~9 a- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 10, :990 Page 4 One of the primary objectives of the CHWMP is that of waste minimization. Tha Plan indicates that San Berna rAino County and its incorporated cities will encourage source reduction and recycling activities where feasible. The development of a comprehensive program for the safe management of hazardous materials and wastes is intended Lo support the economic growth of the County by providing assistance to industry on waste minimization, as well as allowing for the development of environmentally sound hazardous waste facilities for proper treatment, sto raoe, and/or disposal of wastes which cannot be reduced. Additionally, the CHWMP establishes siting criteria which must he met by any hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility serving more than one local generator located in San De rna rdino County. These criteria will ensure that hazardous waste management facilities are ~~ocated only in environmentally appropriate areas, near generators and far from residential areas and immob+le populations. Potentially significant impacts and necessary mitigation measures for specific development projects would be identified with health risk assessments at a site- specific level. The basic types of specified han rdous materials ar.A was*.e facilities discussed in the CHWMP include residual repositories and land disposal, transfer, and storage facilities, recycling facilities, and a va riety of waste treatment facilities ranaina from transportable treatment units, to incineration or solidification and stabilization processes. According to the Plan, the desert region of the County provides the only po to ntial ly suitable sites for residual repositories and land disposal. The other types of facilities mentioned in the LHWMP could possibly he sited in heavy industrial use zones in Lhe Lounty, subject to Tanner legislative provisions, CHWMP siting criteria, complete site-specific environmental impact analyses, conditional use permits, and local performance standards. The City's only "heavy" industrial use zone is located in Industrial Specific Pian Subarea 15 isee Exhibit "B"). General Plan Amendment Existing objectives and policies established by the City's General Plan, with regard to the safe and healthful management, handling, and treatment of hazardous materials and wastes in Liquid and Solid Waste Facilities are found in the Public Facilities Section of the Land Use and Development Element: Objective, pg. III - 681: "Cooperate with the County on plans, policies, and programs to manage solid wastes and hazardous wastes." X13 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 10, 7990 Page 5 l POl is ies, pg. IiI - 69~ "Encourage and support County municipal waste minimization and reduction programs, in;.lud ing recyr,li ng and resource recovery programs." "Adopt a Ha za rdou5 'daste Management Plan and implementing ord Ana nces." "Cooperate with the County and participating agencies to achieve hazardous waste management goals, including but not limited to, participating in a hazardous materials disclosure program and support of the County Hazardous Materials Emergency Response program." Therefore, adoption of the CHWMP will facilitate implementation of these existing General Plan policies and objectives. Staff rec ortimends the following amendment to the current language (see Exhibit "0") of the Liquid and Solid Was*.e Facilities portion of the Public Facilities Section of the General Plan ipg. SII - 68, para. 6~: The Sta*.e iNea lth and Safety Code, Sec tien 25135, et, seq .l has ode.^.±ified hazardous waste as a Class of ,^afe rials requiring special land use planning, use regulation, and disposal regulation. WnAer the }awa tke been ty of San Berea rd ine Beoartment et Envirenmen ta} Wea}tk SPPViPP9 3s preparing a }eea} Wazardews Waste Management P}an wh iek must ke apprev eA ky the State Be partment of Wea}th Se rv iees zed ky 59't of tpe 6}ties witk S9% of the peps}atien in Eke 6eurty ky dune 3Ba }g89: }ke 6i ty et Ra peke 6ueamenga }5 pa rt ie ipating in the deveie pment of the 6evnty Wa za rd eus Waste Management P}a n: In complia me with these State legislative provisions, the San Bernardino County Hazardous Ya ste Management Plan, has been adopted by the Coun~:y Board of Supervisors (February 5, 1990) and is hereby incor{ara ted by reference. iNOte: Strike-through indicates deleted language; bold type ind icate5 new language.) IV. ANALYSIS: Issues and Concerns Staff has identified three aruas of concern associated with the CHWMP. These issues include: li the permitted uses in heavy industrial areas according to the City's Industrial Specific Flan and according to the CHWMP; 21 the health and safety of immobile populations le .g. in prisons. medical centers, etc .l; and 3? future CHWMP implementation measures. The City's concerns about these issues are discussed below: ~acp PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 10, 1990 Page 6 ~. Permitted Industrial Uses The CHWMP indicates that only heavy industrial areas would be appropriate locations for the siting of hazardous waste facilities. Although a "heavy" industrial use area is iGdnti `ied in the City lSuba rea 15 of the Industrial Specific Plan fIS P` __ see Exhibit "6"l, the actual uses permitted in Subarea '.` "' -f a leeser intensity than those required for off-site regional treatment facilities. The City's heavy industrial designation differs from :hat of the County's in that certain procedural and performance standards have been established by the City's ISP to guide the development of these particular industrial areas. These City guidelines restrict activities in the "heavy" industrial use area. The City's project development procedures, in conjunction with the CHWMP polities, would include requirements for compliance with the Tanner legislative provisions, a Conditional Use Permit lCUP1, and, because of the proximity of the West Valley Detention Center which houses an immobile population in th=_ "heavy" industrial area), a risk assessment for any hazardous waste facility proposal for the area would also be required. Staff maintains that, in light of the City's development standards, it is highly unlikely that any of the hazardous waste facilities specified in the CHWMP cnn ld meet rr,e rco ~ryu iremencs, w~tn the possible exception of a transfer and storage facility. Moreover, the health and safety of the immobile population in the City's "heavy" industrial use area must he assured 6efo re any hazardous waste treatment facility could locate in ISP Subarea I5, 2. Health and Safety of immobile Populations The protection of the immobile population at the West Valley Detention Center in ISP Subarea 15 i; important to the City. Originally, the County Plan required a one-mice hu ffer hetween an immobile population facility and the location of a hazardous waste treatment facility. Subarea 15 is the only potentially "suitable" siting area in the City. The one-mile buffer zone weu lA haye exc lured an•• ha za rdous wane tae ,:l ;ry froiii locating in Subarea l5 isee Exhibit "C"), However, the Final CHWMP was amended to eliminate the one-mile buffer zone requirement. The Plan now requires a risk assessment for the proposed location prior to siting a hazardous waste facility closer than one mile to a fac+lity housing an immobile population, in order to determine that no significant risY, is presented to that population. A risk assessment is a highly detailed and specialized mathematical analysis used to Aetermine the potential hazards or consequences of an action. ass PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCNO CUC AMONGA October !0, 1990 Page 7 The amendment of the buffer policy initially raised some concerns about whether or not the immobile populations would still be adequately protected. However, the knowledge tha± risk assessments provide full disclosure of the safety issues, and are required to he incorporated into the siting considerations, mitigates the City's concerns. These risk assessments review the risk of upset, air emissions, potential ground water pollution, and other key factors, and would ensure that the health and safety of the immobile population would he safeguarded. 3, Implementation Measures The safe management of hazardous materials, as well as hazardous wastes is ensured by the CHWMP. Implemen to tion of the programs and policies that are presented in the CHWMP are designed to have an overall beneficial impact on the environment and on public health and safety, by both minimizing existing hazards and 6y providing for thorough analyses of public health impacts. Future implementation measures for the CHWMP will he needed, but are not required during the 180-day action period. It is an *_ic ipated that the City wi',l review and adopt some, or all, of the implementation measures adopted by the County. Major implementation of the ha za rdnus wa sfe ma nanoment offn~+~ will be accomplished through adoption of County ordinances, and Staff expects that City review and subsequent adoption of appropriate and finances will continue. Conclusion Staff indicates that the issues of the health and safety of immobile populations, adequate performance standards, and future implementation measures can he adequately addressed utilizing a combination of the Tanner legislative provisions, the CHWMP goals and policies, and the City's applicable standards. The immobile population issue will be amply safeguarded by the risk assessment requirements. The permitted development it the heavy industrial areas will be effectively guided by the rombinati on of Tanner to cla.:Ye requ irC^~^25 CHWMP `atii tY SiLiiie cimditinn t_. and they City's procedural ~ and performance standards. Future implementation actions required for the Plan will be accomplished by continuing the City's cuopera ti ve efforts with the County. a9~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO LUC AMONGA October t0, 1990 Page 8 V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Staff has made the following findings: 'a `, That the CHWMP comprehensively and adequately addresses hazardous materials and waste management issues; and ib' That City adoption of the CHWMP will occur during the 180-day State mandated atti on period ending Oet ember 5, 1990; and rc~ That Lhe proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor surrounding properties; sod rd? That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inland Vallev Da ilv Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing. VII. RECOMMENDATION: Legislation passed in 1987 !SB 477) requires counties and cities to amend their General Plans within ?80 days of State approval of the CHWMP to bring local planning documents into consistency with the CHWMP. The consequence of not taking one of the prescribed actions would be that potential hazardous waste facility applications submitted in the City would then be under the purview of the State au rhorities, and the opportunity for local jurisdictional review and control of the facility siting rprovided by the CHWMP) would be precluded. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution reconmend ing approv a' of General Plan Amendment 90-02A to the City Council and recommendation of issuance of a Negative Declaration, thereby allowing the applicable portions of the State-approved County Hazardous Waste Management Plan to 6e incarpo ra ted by reference ir.*.o the Public Facilities Sec t!on of the Land Use Element of the City s General Plan, Respe f ly su ed, Brad r f.i tv Plannar BB;LM/j fs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - City Council Resolution No. 89-234 Exhibit "B" - Industrial :ipecific Plan Subarea 15 Exhibit "C" - Inmobile Population within Buffer Zone Exhibit "D" - Existing Ger eral Plan Text Resolution Recommending Approval of GPA 90-02A a9 ~ ~ .....rte •` ITEM: GPA 90A2A CITY OF Rt~t, _ UCAMONGA FL9N;`t~1S[ON Tm.E: CITY COIfNCII, RES.NO. 89.234 ,, ,.._.r:; S..... RESOLUT[UN N0. 93-234 FJ4~Ci:"A" A RES OLUTI UN BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAIiONCA, LAl1FORNI A, APPROVING THE SAN BE RNARD INO COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN CGNFORMANLE WITH A62948 (TANNER) wnEHEAS, Assembly Bill 2948 (Tanner Act, Chapter 1504, Statues of 1986) authorizes counties to adopt, as an element of the General Plan, a County Hazardous Was to .la nageme nt Plan pu rs ua nti to guidelines adopted by the State Department of Health Services (herein after tall ed State) and specifies procedures for the preparation, revision, adoption, app rovai, and amendment of the Plan; and WHEREAS, the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors au thur ized, by resolution, the preparation of the Hazardous Waste Management Plan (herein after called Plan), and a Plan has been prepared with the assistance of the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan Advisory Committee and input from the cities, local and regional agencies and the public; and WHEREAS, the Plan includes comprehensive goals and policies for the effective management of hazardous waste in the County, these goals include: i. io pro Lett the health and welfare of the public, environment, and economy of San Bernardino County through a comprehensive program that ensures safe and responsible management of ~...:,.r~w+ ..u+.ci ~~~a i6, is i. 2. To reduce the amount of hazardous waste generated in the County by providing improved programs for hazardous waste source reduction and recycling. 3. To ensure proper management of hazardous waste/material by identifying and encouraging safe and efficient methods for managing hazardous waste/material and by providing for needed hazardous waste facilities in San Bernardino County. 4, To prevent hazardous waste from being permanently disposed into land, or emitted into the air without being processed by an economically and technically feasible al ternatYve tethrwlogy. s. Ta involve the public, industry, and government ir, a comprehensive Drocess that develops solutions for the management and disposal of hazardous waste, 6. To establish a framework for the development oP San Bernardino County's share of hazardous waste facilities. 7. To recognize that consumers contribute to the generation of hazardous waste, and therefore, that Limiting industrial growth would not be an appropriate means of reduciny the County's commiGnent in hazardous waste ^manpagement. :/ O Resolution No. 89-233 Page 2 8. To encourage and develop public education oro grams on the proper management and disposal of hazardous waste. 'dH EREAS, the Pl art was submitted to the City for review and aDDroval as mandated by the Tanner Act which requires, as one of the requirements for State app ro vai of the Ptan, that the County obtain approval from 50 percent of the cities with 50 percent of the incorporated population; and WHERf.AS, t"•e County must submit the Ptan to Che State for their approval by June i, 1989; and WHEREAS, the City will have. an oppartun ity to adopt some form of the Plan at a later date consistent with the Tanner Act which states that within 130 days after receiving no tifita ti on from the State that the County Plan has been approved, the City must do one of the following: Adopt a City hazardous waste management plan containing all of the elements required by the Tanner Act and which is consistent with the approved County Plan. 2. [ncor Dora to the aDDlica ble portions of the approved County Plan, by reference, into the City General Plan. 3. Enact an ordinance which requires that all applicable zoning, subdivision, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance decisions are consistent with the portions of the approved County Plan which identify general areas of siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and WHEREAS, the Plan when ado pied by the County and Cities aill serve as the primary planning document for the management of hazardous waste fn the county and aill provide for local involvement to the siting of hazardous waste fac'.1lties. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calffornia. does hereby aDProve the County Plan, in conformity with AB2948 (Tanner). PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1989. AYES: Alexander, Brown, Buquet, Wright NOES: No^.e ABSENT: Stout // ' ennis L. tout, Mayor ~9 2e so lution :W. 39-?3J Page 3 ATTEST: Bever y A Authelet, ity C erk i, 8"ty ERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY LIERK of the City of Rarc ho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that Che forego ing Resolution uas duly passed, approved, and adopted by Lhe City Council of ~Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 11th day of May, 1989. Executed this 18th day of May, 1989 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. y . vo ~ Bever ~ the el t, City ~rk ,..; ~ r, The fcrc; ^.'~-.; ~ . :..;;.,-~, is a orrr , cony of iira c~i,;n;:a nn iile in GTi; OfiirP A7TEST; ~ ~ ^ r 3 , 19~ EcVLRI.`' LET City C{~~k, Ranch~y~camongarCalii. ~~ '.'..... ..., r ... ..........I:. ~ .. ... ... ~. ~..: V.........: .:I:I'. " 1 sPHeae o LEGIiND: ® ISPSUBAREA l5 _~,~ 5 CITY OI' ~ ~~ >~y . UCAMONGA PLPN-, ION ..._. -,..u.... ITEM: GPA 90.03A PIDUSTRLILSPECIFIC PLAN N T171E: SUBAREA 1S EXFi63ff: "B" SCALE: NONE'. iu ocr vo :VEST VALLEY DETENTION CENTER (immobile Population) RISK ASSESSMENT BUFFER ZONE (One Mile Radius) HEAVYINDUSTR[AL AREA (ISP Subarea IS) CITY' OF CAMONGA P ON ~~ "1.r I.AN r, ,~, I ..h ITEM: CPA 99.63A IMMOBILEPOPULATION N TITLE: WlIIV BUFFER ZONE EXH®IT: "C" SCALE: NONE IU OCf 90 3 e s Q -6q`z ~mF _mSo~SmLL ~cL $aaa= _~~~ag oe8~~o€;s E~_~Na~^_ ~~EOm 4m _- 'l~ ~Qa ~m om~ m~ UmE U?S a°a 3L~ ~£~~ °a qa""~ Lmm RR6m g3 ~° c~3'a a„ Y3 ZN ~r „U yvG Egg _=a «~ miMS~ Am~:~ 02j~•q ~~ma;. ~:FEf k=:-° ~~$`-n €~ ~R d~_d-~ um-'a ~„~2z 3 ' v tpi Uy# g~w ~e ~~~ ye~ 2~ QQF~ Gds ~4~ Emm r~p i~o U° S a4~ .3 r ~ E oE3~ 4Rag 2m~pm ~t Si Am - - omEmz~ ¢3cn 1 °E~Eo rU E~iE~ arm =g -cEm~3'E~ -c¢ -a~F Emc~B 9'm9r _: HEm mmE-mU -~a3mUe cam 4 Vf-'9m$ ~'na3 Ec-_ o Nmco ~ ~8~ m~mm~ m r ~c~,s dg~~ge 4 s o,:'a~~' gs `< ~ i ~ gg ^p si e ~ e j ~ ~ fr p e !! ~ s`r~x ~~nr ~ ~ ~~$~~'~pp~F ~~" rim:~~ as S`~ €R'gr8g oS F `snp=: 3mg~ §e r.~~q YB zom gyp= xgc pi"~~ Vm~3 .~ 35 Otmt~o cm Egy{ g~3A sc°_ ~~~~ 8 ms°° Ap~F~~„ €g~ ie~~ ~€~PP~~ 4¢~ ~~$° 3~~a&o~ t; 8g ~a~: . o5 `6~c :a E o A~ ~ g o~Esen ~ 2 dd ~ gy?y Ygg' ~~~wg ~ R~~fgg~ i ~~g~$~€`s~4 ~ggFgg~ ~"s~$9 ¢ 44`g c'~ ~ ~~z~r~p~3 a ~ ~ 8• ~ E51 ~ 1 w 8 f'$ a 2 9~ a o ~~ o U g }' ~ a y O~ w § S E ~EmE E m4$~g, ~m _uu2m mm ~~m"" m _~ U °~ pp o ~'~m c qmE me RRqw ~°5~{a o~$g`~3,3 d6 Uuc ~m mwl z ~ F,^, F ~., z Z~ rL 1 ~f < 4 o y3 P ~ Z- v ` Z'~ ~~ n x?' R v F- y m X U z ~z U O~ ~ C7 ~z ~; w~ p a ~~ 6 C 8 o ~. °rv ~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. 90-133 A PESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COh41I SS[ON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-02 A, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN TO INCORPORATE BV REFERENCE THE APPROVED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN /CHWMP? INTO THE PUBLIC FACILITIES SECTION OF THE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL IfORNI A, rvND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (ij The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 90-02A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub,{ect General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." (ii) On October 10, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applfcat ion. lii ij All legal prerequisites prior to Che adoption of this Re solution have occurred. B. Re 5o7u lion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planninn rn,mn: va:~,. 0° ~~.~ re.. ~ ,~,~~iw hula mUngd d5 r0110W5: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that ali of the facts set fo r•th in the Recitals, Part A, of this Re salut ion are true and correct. 2, Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October S0, 1990, inc iud ing written and oral staff reports, together With public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The appllcation applies citywide; and (bl The application proposes to change paragraph 6 of the Liquid and Solid Waste Fat ilitfes port ton of the Public Facilities Section of Lhe General Plan to read as follows: The State fNeaith and Safety Code, Section 25135, et. seq.? has identified hazardous waste as a class of materials requiring special land use planning, use regulation, and disposal regulation. In complfance with these ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-133 GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October t0, t990 Page 2 legislative provisions, the San 9erna rd ino County Hazardous Waste Management Plan ha; been adopted 6y the County Board of Supervisors ~Februa ry 5, 1990` and is hereby incorporated by reference. !c) This amendment does not conflict with the Public Faciii ties Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, citywide, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Public Facilities Section of the Land Use and Development Element; and (e! This amendment wcu ld not be materially injurious or detrimental to properties within the City and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that issuance of a Negative Oec Tara tion is recrmmended. 3, Based upon the substantial evidence Dre sented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: ~a) That the CHWMP comprehensively and adequately addresses hazardous materials and waste management issues; and (b! That City adoption of the CHNMP will occur during the 180- day State-mandated action period ending December 5, 1990; ic) That the Droposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor surrounding properties; and !d) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4, This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of~a Negative Declaration. 5 Based anon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs t, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City gf Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 10th day of October 1990 oP General Plan Pmendment No. 90-02A. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shalt certify to the adoption of this Resolution. /C~l..~ PLANNING COMAI SSION RESOLUTION N0. 90-133 GPA 90-02R - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 10, 1990 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED T!'.IS lOTN DAY OF OCTOBER !990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE LITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DY ATTEST rry q~ntei, cnairman I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plann~i ng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of Oc Leber 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES; COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHE R, TOLSTOY NOES: COMA SSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 3d~ RESOLUTION N0. UD - C~~ Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC h'0 CUC AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90 -02R PMEND ING THE GENERAL PLAN iC INCORPORATE BY REFER EiiCE THE APPnuY'c0 GAN GERiJA"nuiii"u COuii i'i HAZAR"u00G WASTE MANAGEidE NT PLAN (CHWMP) INTO THE PUOLIC FACILITIES SECTION OF THE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT FOP, R ANC h'0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A, Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Pmendment No. 90-02A as described in the title of tM s Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." !ii) On October 10, 1990, the Pla nni n9 Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hea ri nq on the application, znd fellowi ng the conclucion of said public hearing adoptad RPSOlution No. 90-133 Lhereby recommending to Lhis City Council that said application be approved. (iii) On November 7, 1990, *.he City Council of the City of Ha ncho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Resolution. !iv) All legrl prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have eccurre.^.. B. 2e solution. NOW, THEREFORE, the Lity Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali ft rnia, does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recita ts, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds and certifies this project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental puality Act of !970, and further, Lhis Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to Lhis Council dur!ng the, abo~re-referenced public hearing nn November 7, 1990, including written and 3n~ CITY COUNCIL RESOL UTiON N0. GPA 90-02A - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA November 7, 1990 Page 2 oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (CHWMP) comprehensively and adequately addresses hazardous materials and waste management issues, as evidenced by the State Department of Health Services' approval; and (b) That the City adoption of the CHWMP will occur during the 180-day State mandated action period ending December 5, 1990, as required by California Health and Safety Code Section 25135.7 (c); and (c) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor surrounding properties, as demonstrated by the findings and conclusions of the initial study; and (d) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, as established by the consistency with existing objectives and policies in the Public Fatiliti es Section of the Land Use and Development Element. 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the application. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 1. rF ~g uvi i yr nr~i~v.n~ uu,.nivivi. u~+ STAFF REPORT DATE: November I, 1990 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BV: Miki Br•a tt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASS ESSNENT AND SPECIFIC PLry 89-OlV CONSORTIUM OF ETIWANDA NORTH LANDOWNERS - Planning Commission's recommendation to deny a Specific Plan for 5,080 dwelling units, 9.6 acres of commerc iai, and related school, park, and open space uses on 6,765 acres of land generally located north of 24th Street with portions north of Highland Rv enue, south of the National Forest Boundary .with portions within the National Forest), east of the extension of Milliken Avenue, and west of the Fontana City limit. Planning Commission recommends denial without prejudice, RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the ,..,c,,,a oo~.,i~~r;~„ „f ncn;al, without oreiudice, of the subject application. BACKGROUND 8 ANALYSIS: Etiwa nda North Soeci fic Plan. A*. present there are three Eti wa nda North Specific Pian applications of record for approximately the same area. The first version was the subject application, Specific Plan 89 -OL, which was filed in the City in February 1989 and is still incomplete. The environmental review was begun at that Lime and is still incomplete. The applicant was informod in February 1490 that the development standards section was unacceptable. Meetings between staff and the applicant indicated that there was a conflict between the City's position on development standards and Lhe applicant's position on o~~;r~ Because of the aforementioned conflict, the applicant has fileA a second version of the Specific Plan in the County. Negotiations with the County began in March 1990. The Specific Plan application was formally filed in the County in May 1990, The third Etiwa nda North Specific Plan is being prepared by the City. On June 10, 1990, the City Council passed the kesolution of Intent to 3og CITY COJ NCIL STAFF REPORT SP 89-01 - ETIWANDA NORTH CONSORTIUM November 1, 1990 Page 2 The primary purpose of the rec omne nd ed action of denial for the subject application is to clear the table. The subject application has been inactive in the City since February 1990 and has been superseded by the applicant's submittal of a Specific Plan to the Lounty. This action will somewhat lessen the confusion about which Eti wa nda North Specifi: Plan is being referenced. Pla nninq Commission Puhl is Hearing. Un September 'L6 and October 1C, 1990, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject application and approved a Resolution Recommending Cenial, without prejudice, of the subject application. (See attached Staff Report of October 10, 1940, and attachments.! The reason for the continuance of the public hearing from September 26 to October 10, '.990, was to provide the Commission an opportunity to review the correspondence from the applicant. 'See attached "Staff Analysis and Documentation. Letter of September 25, 1990" and also see "Minutes of the Planning Commission for September 26 and October 10, 1990.1 In oral and written testimony, the applicant raised three broad issues as follows: Did the applicant's plans receive ad eGua to review and consideration by staff? 2. Did staff make decisions and oolicies con tra rv to direction by the Park Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council? 3. What is the present basis for negotiation with the Consortium and with individual landowners? The Planning Commission concurred with staff's response that: Staff did thoroughly review the applicant's plans. 2. Staff did follow the direction of the Park Comm scion, Planning Commission, and City Council in interactions with the applicant. 3. The door is open to negotiation with the applicant, but the Citv's pgsitian Gas chanced froa~ reactive to proactive. Proactive Planning for the Et iwanda North Area. Regarding the City's proactive stance, the City is preparing an Eti wa nda North Specific Plan with direction from the City Council. The City Council has also suggested that a joint City/County Specific Plan may best serve the area which is now under the County's jurisdiction, but is within the City's Sphere-of-lnflue nce. A joint City/County Specific Plan was again found 3 /.~ CI7V COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 89-01 - ETIWANDA NORTH CONSORTIUM November %, 1990 Page 3 to be a viable option at the conclusion of the October 23, 1990 meeting held by County Supervisor Jon Mikels on the Etiwa nda North area. find ings for Genial. The Planning Commission recomne ndation for denial is based on the following: * The application for Specific Plan 89-OI is incomplete. * The applicant did not submit a concurrent application to zmend the General Plan as would be required for consistency with the Specific Plan. * The applicant did not provide funds to complete the environmental assessment. The Planning Commission recommends that the action be "without prejudice" in order to keep the door open to negotiation with the a pplitant. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Inca nd Vallev Gaily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to property owners. CONCLUSION: If the City Cou nr.il agrees with the recomme rd z ti on of the Planning Commission, the attached Resolution of Denial, without p re Jud ice, should be approved. Res ly s it d Brad r City anner BD :MB/jf; Attachments: Exhibit "1" - Vicinity Map Staff Report to Planning Cnmmi ssion dated October 10, ]99D Letter of September 25, 1990 Staff Analysis and Documentation: Letter of September 25, 1990 Minutes of the Plann7ng Commission, September 26, 1990 Minutes of the Planning Commission, October 10, 1990 !draft) Resolution No. 90-128 Recommending Denial Resolution of Denial ~/ LEGEND UNNINI EX15Twd CITY SPHERE OF OJFIUENCE CI1Y OF UCAMONGA pL~ ~~ ' iOrv 3/~- 1 SPECIFIC P~IY 90-01 E77WANDA NORTN ~~~~ Speck Plan 89-01 ~> wCLU0E5 AREAS 2.6 k A-E Z IJIQIVERSlfYOPCAI.B~DRNINCARYN 3 LANDMARK DEVLPMT. CO. ~ CFiEr703AN SEVAwE S CNANO d CfiutiG iuu.Su7E COMPLETED ANNEXAllON3: A+CARYN.6+WATT wLAND, C+AHMANSON, D. WATT wLAND EMPEtE, d E+BLACICMANhiOMESTEAD! REMINOTDN (fEM: ENSP 89.01 TITLE: VICINITY MAP N EXHIBIT:"1" SCALE: NOME u sFPT 90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 10, 1990 70: Chai rnlan and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Brat?; Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN 89-GI - CONSORTIUM OF ETINRN GA NORTH LANDONNERS - A request to approve a Specific Plan for ,080 dwelling units, 9.6 acres of coma ercial, and related school, park, and open space uses on 6,754 acres of land generally located north of 24th Street with portions north of Highland Avenue, south of the National Forest Boundary with portions within the National Forest, east of the extension of Milliken Avenue, and west of the Fontana City limit. I. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On September 26, 1990, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject application and continued said item to the October 10, 1990 meeting of the Planning Commission (see attached Staff Report dated September 26, 1990, Exhibit "AA"). The purpose of the continuance was to enable the Planning Commission to review the letter of September 26, 1990, fran Mr, Joseph N. Dilorin nn tho --'~~~~- °YYl'°u ei u. \]CC CE III UIC "tltl"). On October 2, 1990, Mr. Larry McNiel and Mr. Peter Tolstoy met in their capacity as the Eti wa nda North sub-committee of the Planning Commission and directed staff to prepare a response to the subject letter, including the documentation requested by the Planning Comm ssion. Staff is preparing the response and the requested documentation and wilt present the aforementioned material orally at the Planning Commission meeting. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution Recommending Denial, without prejudice, of the subject apol ica Lion. Res ppCf`fil 1 y arad City P an BB:MB/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "AA" - September 26, 1990 Planning CommissS on Staff Report Exhibit "8B" - Letter from Joseph O1IOrio Resolution Recommending Denial 3/~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 26, 1990 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner `~ SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 - CONSORTIUM OF ETIWANDR NORTH LRNDOWNE RS - A request to ~a ppro ve a Specific Plan for 5,080 dwelling units, 9.6 acres of commercial, and related school, park, and open space uses on 6,754 acres of land generally located north of 24th Street with portions north of Highland Avenue, south of the National Forest Boundary with portions within the National Forest, east of the extension of Milliken Avenue, and west of the Fontana City limit. ABSTRACT: Although the City Council, the Planning Commission, Lhe Parks Commission, and staff have invested a huge effort to process the Consortium's Eti wanda North Specific Plan, key elements of the plar. are s*.ill missing or incompl eLe. Also, since February :990, there has been no response by the Consortium to City efforts to continue processing the Specific Plan. For the above and other reasons, staff requests that the Planning Commission rerommend rn the City Council denial without prejudice of the subject application. II. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Much Planning Commission, Trails Committee, "r arks Commission, City Council, and staff time has been invested on our Sphere of Influence and the Eti wanda Ilorth Specific Plan. (See attached Exhibit "A", Vicinity Map.) Planning Canmission Workshops. Eleven Planning Commission workshops on the Consortium's Specific Plan were held between September 22, 1988 and September 7, 1989. The primary focus of the workshops was design, including architectural styles, neighborhood design concepts, and community design concepts. These el eme r,ts of the Specific Plan were revised at Che beginning of the Specific Plan process to resod nd to concerns of the Planning Commission. These elements were to be reviewed again in the context of review of the entire Specific Plan. However, key elements needed to be addressed before the Specific Plan could be considered complete and reviewed as a comprehensive plan. Elements of concern included grading issues, infrastructure /~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SP 09-01 -CONS GRTIUM SEPTEMBER 26, 1990 Page 2 phasing and financing, parks, open space, trails, equestrian uses, fire management, and wildlife resources management. Three Planning Commnissi on workshops were devoted to the Hillside Development Ordinance and subsequently, in January, 1990, the Ordinance was adopted. The last Planning Conmissi on workshop was a joint meeting with the Park and Recreation Commission to Aiscuss park issues, a potential equestrian center, and trails. Park and Recreation Commission Review. The Park and Recreation Commission also discussed Eti wanda North park concept plans at five of their regular meetings. In September the Park and Recreation Commission requested major revisions to the Eti wa nda North Park Plan. As of this date, no revisions to the park plans have been submitted Lo the City. Further, the flood Control District subsequently notified the City that not only did they not want park uses indicated for flood Control Lands, but that the site proposed for a community equestrian center, in the vicinity of 24th Street and Etiwa nda Creek Channel, was not available for that use since it was committed for use as a wildlife habitat preservation and mitigation area. City Council Review. The City Council has addressed related issues within the Specific Plan area, including a Fire CFD and a General CFD which includes Dratna ge Facilities and Police Services. Further, on May 2 and November 15, 1989, and February 7, 1990, the City Council discussed and adopted policy on annexation as it related to Lhe Eti wanda North Specific Plan. The main element of the policy is that City Standards must be applied to developne nt in the Sphere of Influence area. At the March and April 1990 meetings of the Consortium of Landowners, staff attended and indicated that City policy was firmly in support of City standards and that there was a conflict between City standards and the density proposed by the Consortium. In June 1990, at the request of the Lonsortium, senior staff attended the monthly meeting of the Consortium and explained that the City Council policy to uphold City stamdards is in effect and ^°ffi ~aed that Gunfiict does exist between City standards and density in Lhe Specific Plan area. Consortium's Oraft Etiwanda North S ecific Plan. The Planning Commission has received severe pre iminary versions of the draft Specific Plan. The last distribution was of the June 23, 1989, draft. Staff reviewed the June, 23, 1989, draft and advised the applicant that it was incomplete and that revisions would be required. Grading standards was a key issue which was 3 ~S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFP REPOfti SP 89-01 -CONSORTIUM SEPTEMBER 26, 1490 Page 3 subsequently addressed by adoption of the Hili side Development Ordinance. Various other develo Anent standards ca ntinue to he an important issue as well. Also, the park and open space sections required substantial review and revision. On February 14, 1990, the applicant submitted a screen check draft Specific Ptan for staff review. (A copy is included in the Commission's agenda packet.) The applicant stated that o,-,e of the changes in the plan was to decrease tat sizes by 10 percent throughout the Specific Plan area in order to meet the City standard of a 60 foot right-of-way for local streets. The effect of that change would have been Lo further increase the density permitted in the Specific Plan area and reduce lot sizes below the 5,50D square foot minimum then proposed for the University tracts. Staff responded, stating that "substantial changes" in development standards are proposed which will require detailed staff review, as well as policy direction from the Planning Commission and the City Council. As noted above, an Etiwanda North sub-committee of the City Council was formed and the Council as a whole directed staff to firmly uphold City standards at development. Environmental Impact Re Dart. An EIR must be prepared for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and preparation began in February 1989. In February 1990 the Eti Wanda North E[R consultant notified the City that additional services would be needed to evaluate revisions to the Traffic Study and Resource raeccy~,uen[ Plan. Staff evaluated the consultaa+'t p;,,pasal and discussed it with the appli[a"*. „ npri~ 1990 staff requested that the additional Girc services be funded by Che applicant. No response to that request has been received from the appt ica nt. Specific Pi an Status. In March 1990 staff forwarded a project status report to the applicant indicating major items which were still incompi ere. In April 7990 staff again forwarded a project status re pa rt. In May 1990 the mast recent project status report was prepared and forwarded to the applicant. (See Exhibit "6", letter dated May 21, 1;90, and Specific Plan Status Report.) Each report indi rates that although progress had been made, key elements of the Specific Ptan were still missing or incomplete. County Processing, In negotiating to process Lhe Can;ortium's appiication5 in the City, staff made ii clear Chat processing of applira*.ions +n, t,",e County would be oppOSed. At their April 1990 monthly meeting, Consortium members reviewed the co r.fl ict between City standards and the Consortium's density demands and decided to prote55 development in the County, in April 1990 the Univo rsity Crest project was reactivated in the 3~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SP 89-01 -CONSORTIUM SEPTEMBER 26, 1490 Page 4 County. In June 1990 the Consortium filed an application for an Etiwanda North Specific Plan in the County of approximately 5,499 acres. The smaller area Specific Plan omits Landmark's Oak Summit application filed in the County in November 1989 far a private golf cn urse and 620 units on 161 acres of land. The County ~pplj ref ipp a150 O.T.i tS L11 Lis the Etiwanda North area which have already been annexed" into the City. (See attached Exhibit "C" Status Report for Sphere Projects, September 12, 1990.) AoDlicant Intentions. On May 21, 1990, a letter was sent to the applicant noting that applications had beers files in the County and asking whether they intended to continue processing City applications. (See Exhibit "B", letter dated May 21, 1990.) No response has been received regarding City processing. III. SUMMARY: As of this date, the applicant has filed and is processing applications in the County which duplicate applications which have been filed in the City. The City applications have been inactive since February 1990. The applicant has not responded to the April 1990 request for additional services and funds for completion of the EIR. Also, the applicant has not res pa nded to the May 21, 1990, letter stating whether they do, or do not, wish to process in the City. On the key issue of density, the applicant has stated that the Consortium will not negotiate. Sinai iy, Lirc apps rani iiaa nut res pu ndeti w revues cs Lo reVi5e elements of the Specific Plan in favor of City standards. iV. CONCLUSION: Based on the above fnformati on, staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution recamnending to the City Council denial without prejudice of the subject application. /R~e~'s7pec tfully submitted, " Brad Bul er t! City Planner BB :MB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Letter of May 21, 1990 and attached Specific Plan Status Report, May 1990 Exhibit "C" -Status Report for Sphere Project, September 5, 1990 Resolution of Denial 3/~ ~~11~,_ _.--- - ~,.y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 21, 1990 Mr. Jae Diiorio Etiwanda North Landowners Consortium P.0. Box 216 South Laguna, CA 92677-0216 I`mi Oihce Bo. NO%. Nanano Guaamanga, CaLfornu J V?9, Glai VN0~1 Bit SUBJECT: ETTNANOA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01; ANNEXATION 89-01; ANNEXATION 89-02; (UNIVERSITY TRACTS TT 14492, 14494, 14495, 14522, 14523, ETC.) 11ND CREST TRACTS Oear Mr. Diiorio: The County has advised us that a Specific Plan application for a portion of the Etiwanda North area was submitted to the County on May 9, 1990 and that the University Crest application has Glen active tad in the County. Therefore, please advise us whether you wish to continue processing the above appllcattons In the City. A status update for these pro,iects is attached. On May 2, 1990, the Ctty Council a m rmea Lnat ayyl~~"tio„s '- Lhc Sphere of Interest must be consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the Development Standards. Therefore, the Specific Plan and Tract Maps submitted tD the City must be revised to be consistent with that direction. It should be noted that the County General Plan requires that Planning in the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence must be consistent with County General Plan Policy LU-9 which indicates that City Standards be used in Sphere areas where higher than County Standards. The City Council has directed staff to process any and all aDDlicaif ons in the City's Sphere of Influence to b! consistent with the Lity General Plan and City Development Code. Therefore, we invite the Consortium to either scd!'y the Etiwanda Nerih Specific Plan Lo be caesisten! with this Council direction or withdraw your application. Please let us know your intentions as soon as possible. a/~ EXF~IT "B" un~ilmrnMn .u..., William L Aleunder i,~ Charle, I auqu<t II C~1, ~i^ ~• Drum, L Smut Deborah N. arum Panrla ! Wneht iaok Lam ~V\ ~• Joe D1lorio Applications May 23, 1990 Page 2 If you have any questions please call Larry Henderson or myself at (114) 989-1861. 5{ y, B d B City anne BB:LH:mlg Attachment: Etiwa nda North Pro,~ect Status Update cc: Jon Mikels Jack Lam, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Dev. Director Sharon Hightower Johr. McMa ins ETIWAN DA NORTH PROJECT STATUS UPDATE MAY 16, 1990 SPECIFIC PLAN. The application for Specific Plan is still incomplete. Specific Plan Consistencv with the Citv General Plan. The application as submitted by the Consortium is incomplete, because a project phasing plan has not been completed and because an application to amend the General Plan has not been received. In accordance with State law, a Specific Plan must be consistent with the City General Plan. Because to date, no application for General Plan Amendment has been rec of ved from the Consortium, the City Council has directed staff to revise the Specific Plan to be consistent with the City General Plan and to proceed with the pre- zoning of the Specific Plan area. TRACT MAPS. The applications for Tract Maps are still incomplete Tract Mao Consistencv with the Citv General Plan. Tract Map submittals and review must proceed on the basis of consistency with the City General Plan and the City Development Code. Unive rsity and Crest Pro.iec ts. Because large areas of the University and Crest Tracts are designated as open space in the City's General Plan, Tract Map review cannot proceed until an applica Lion for an amendment to the General Plan is received. As sta tad in nre-annlirafinn moeN nnc nrinr in rho cne.i H~ pt ,., a pplication ~in February ?989, City-staff is receptive to a General Plan Amendment for the University of Calf fornia property because of urbanization of the surrounding land uses, the residential designation on the County General Plan Land Use Map, and the University's proposal to transfer all development rights off a 675 acre property on the upper Day Creek Ma tershed and ded ita to it as permanent open space. This is consistent with the City policy of no development above the National Forest boundary. Potential Land Use Consistencv of the University Prooe rt v. A change from open space to residential use designation of the University property would be consistent with surrounding land uses. The adjacent City Standard is Law density, 2-4 dwelling units per acre, and Very Low density, less than two dwelling units per a_ne Fhe PCUnty aandd rd is gen2raily reiiden tiai, and aiSG varies from soutA to north from "uD to 3 dweiting units per acre' to "up Lo 2 dwelling units per acre." Land use plans submitted to the County and to the City indicate several tracts as residential use to the density range of /-8 dwelling units per acre. This wou id not be consistent wf th Me surrounding land uses and a General Plan Amendment for Mis intensity of use would not be supported by the Lity. 3a~ ET?w/UiDA NORTH PRO.]ECT STATUS Page 2 Prpjec t. A portion of the crest prof ect is aes~gnaiee as open space in the City General Plan, The existing County designation is residential, "up to 2 dwelling units per acre." The City designation would be Very Low density, up to 2 dwelling units per acre. Consistency with the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. The f017CW'^.g is a rnv iew of general lot size and development standards of the City and comparison With Covnty Standards for the University and Crest Tracts: A. Lot Size Standard for University ProAerty. County Development Standards ,Section 88.0520, an-T~- d City Development Standards !Section 17.14.020 D1 provide that a Specific Plan/Planned Community "may" differ from general Development Standards. However, the underlying standards and compatibility with adjacent development for the zpne provide a reference for evaluation of proposals. The underlying City Standard in the Low range requires a 7,200 square foot minimum lot size and 8,000 Square foot average lot size for development on a slope of less than 8E. For slopes greater than 81, the City Hillside Development Ordinance density formula must be applied. Also, the City's method of calculating density Ss on the gross acreage after the deduction for parks, arterial, secondary and collector streets. The underlying Cpunty Standard for the Nest Valley area is i,2 vv Syd~r: ap=t ••~^I,nn,w anf tire. 8. Lot Size Standards for a Portion of the Un iyersity Tract. The underlying City Standard in the Very low Density designation requires a minimum iot size 6f 20,000 square feet and an average lot size of 22,000 Square feet. The underlying County Standard is fora minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. C, Density Bonus Standard, Excellence in design is the base City Standard for development, therefore, the City Goes not offer a density 6onu5 for good design. The County pffers a density bonus of up to 10X based on public benefit above the minimum standard for development. AHHERAT?OM. The applirattpns for annexation are deemed complete on the bds i5 Of completion Of the City's Fiscal impact Study, Tile rp,inr it has directed staff to proceed with Annexation actions. Intent to Annez. The City Council approved Resolutions pf Intent to nn~ ex territory at the May l6, 1990 meeting of the City Council, The purpose of adopting these resolutions is to keep the annexation process on track so that the aDDlicatidn for Specific Plan and Tract review can be Drocessed in the shortest amount of time consistent with the complexity of the applications. C~ v ~ (~~j{ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga c-y+C'/--t DATE: September 12. 1990 TO: DLVrrlbuBOn 1~9t sualECr: Status Report for Sptlere Projects FROM: Advanced Ranning proJeet N Appllpnt Acres DVa G2O° Densltr Lot 84e Aseaare/ 84tm /Lad Planner ame ~~ Clly CouneO adopted Resolutlon of III intent to Annex on 6/ I6: app9®non flledMmlAFC06/I6. City Caunc9 ECIWANDA Aeaoiuuon of fntrnt m prepare fipeclflc NORn-I ~;jty 6754 1 5i/Bt1 [[ui Ii drle5 Han appmvcd 6/1G; 6pecitla: par SPECIFIC avaLL per ales contract evrardcd 7/ia; draft due 9/14 PLAN ARF4 EIR nMNanafn progrtea; xrem check drag due 8/31. Henderson/Bmtl Cnunry Referzal e6 - 05 ~2•I Apps®tbn actlvatcd N County. UNVmtlty FLul Development Plan, Maattt of TeratNe and Tena6ve-71act Mapa NM University CaWOmla/ 426 1293 3.1 6,000 m County: xheduled for CIry CC 9/5. Cn'St Catyn s9 R [tlln. Wry PC 9/ 12. Co. PC 10/ 7l. EIR m lx amended. City opposes County pmcessing. IStarrgiel Brett County Rekrtal t79 - 03 • 13 I Landmark 10,890 landmark aubmt[ted Coun v aPPlkatlon for Banned lk bpment [ard 761 620 0.8 sq 8 aV& h General Ran Amendment, Final Dee. Oak Devlpmt. 10,000 Ran/Tract maps/Percet maps sell be SumtnSt Co. yp (t ~R, conilnued to Oct DRG. EIR wW be rtqulrcd. IFahkl Bmtt County Refenal tN - OZ 14.1 EtlwarRla ~'aPDk®OOn revubmilted to Hel~[k ...... , o.. r ....-.i noe •.w..dm.nt Fl Dev,Co[p./ 172 450 2.65 7,000 from ood- Control W AnMentlal. San Chmg `wB ~~ Ciry apposes General Plan Ammdmrnt. EI C Rd W Sevaine ounty ata ocs not support. A w be requlrcd. IStaifordl Bralt County Referral 90 - 07 j5•) Pre-appllca6on aubMUed to Chang 11 1 County for CP Amendment. PD 1 / 1 to .76 40 4.35 0.000 RES a. city oppoxa General Ran No ' sq II ~• pmeMment County ataRdoa not ROe aupporL EIR vAII be required. ISm(fordl Bmtt 16.I EUwar[da Caunry Rekrtal 90.07 Hdgh4 160 128 not not ~mu will ~ oe Pd u No Dev. Corp./ avall. avall. f rwa ed to the Co nry TfOe Chc Bmtt ~ r[.aunry iieiertai 90-06 ~ /7/ 5500 2975 not Ixufes same ~ aPPlicatbn m City ExeePr. aWLL ~~~ does not Include landmerkA pmleeta annexed. flwln Brett TOTALS for PlojeCt/ 1530.8 2531 1.76 [2•) through [8•) • ~.> Included In E[Manda II Dlsutbutlon: Narih spMEc Plan br>"Wdw•m.~.. s. w. aA.a.rr la/ktterl .~> rtup key City CouncB RlckOomez Jae Schultz Super. Jon Mlkels Brad Buller Karen Emery PlanNngCommleeb n Otto KmuW Shlnlu Box Jack Lem Dan COkman Betty MWn Jetty Fuhvood Bcv Nlneen Ingrid Blair 8rure Buckingham ICOUnty SIaBI 3a~ xrem./.ua~. e.n.~rao EXHIBIT "C' 1 T1G'y~ City of Rancho Cucamonga DATE: September 12. 1990 sus.lECT Statue Report for Sphere Projects (continued) COlllfllCfCff AaNCXQNOrLS -2- ' Cot 81m Name Applicant Aetd -U a DenWry A~ert(e/ Sgtos / Lmd Plannm YlntmuID (p) [AFCO CerilBnUon Caryn/ January 30, 1989 Etlwanda Standard 303 546 2.0 Highlands Pacific (13564/13565) e~al• Nissen [AFCO CertlUwUOn (E7) September 2l, 1988 1Yact ~M 96 252 2,6 13527 ir Nissen iC) lAFCO CertlUpUOn anuary 90. 1989 Ahmaruon 1Yac2 53 131 2.25 14139 Nlaxn )D) uwwi,emumuon November l4. 1989 Watt TtaM inland 53 lie z.zs 13812 Empire Cmhn [AFCO CerUficaUOn fE) 9laclman/ January 5, 1990 'p'act Homestead/ 25 78 3.12 13835 AG°O~On Nissen . ~ .~.' AruaSCed Subtalals 530 1 117 2.45 , (apprmc.) (M/letter) =_> map key ~.-~.,«~-~~ 3~y Exhibit' c-z LEGEND /Nww~r 1 SPECB•TC PLAN 90-01 ECIWANDA NORTH _> INCLUDES AREAS 2.6 d A - E 2 UNIVERSITY OFCALB~RMA(CARYN J LANDMARK DEVLPMT.CO. 4 CHENG SAN SEVAINE CItANG 6 CHENG HB.LSIDE COMPLETED ANNEXATIONS: A=CARYN, 8=W'ATT INLAND, C=AHMANSON, D=WATT INLAND EMPIRE, d E=BLACKMANMOt~S7'F-°~DI REMINGTON EXISTING CITY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE CI"ll' OF CAMONGA PLAN r-1 D lON ]as `- J ITEM: STATUS FOR SPHERE TITLE; VICEVITY MAP EXNIBfC: "A" SCALE: NONE E N Tfie Cary Company FL-vrlOflic~ (bx 4216. &i. Lgguee. U 92677.0716 Oflee (714) 499-4929 fith (714) 499-5!7? September 25, 1990 Chairman McNeil and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Sox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Staff Report £or environmental Assessment and Specific Plan 89-01 Staff Report Eor Environmental Assessement and Tentative Tracts 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523 and Tentative Parcel Map 13128 Dear Chairman McNeil: tVe have reviewed the Staff Report prepared for the September 26, 1990 meeting of the Planning Commission, City of Rancho Cucamonga. We believe the Report is misleading in the following eight respects: ETIWANDA NORTH i Pa Yon nA vs a_4: _ __..J .. ^-- J- - -~~~~ ~~ -1 iP=J nG UiM{{~ L make major revisionsnrequasted in-September,•1989,~but the Etiwanda North Parks Analysis, including park plans, grading plans and asso- ciated coats, was submitted to Joe Schultz on February 7, 1990r and additional correspondence occurred throughout March, 1990. Staff says the Flood Control District says the equestrian center site isn't available, but Caryn owns the rite (10 acres). 2. City. Council Review: it is untrue that strict adherence to City standards was the "main element" of the annexation policy dis- cussed by the Couc:cil in May sad November, 1989. Additional state- ments were made in support of a Specific Plan setting its own stan- dards by Mayor 6tout at the meeting with Supervisor Mikels on May 22, 1990. 3. CynSgriti am,G nrafr ~.r iu•gnda NC^tM en....:c: Pl in di .,ra,....c an. reef opposition to Staff's Report, the Febzuary 14, 1990 draft of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan di3 not propose any increase in density by the addition of dwelling units. Staff continues to misuse the City's definition of density. 'Che "detailed Staff review" promised to the Consorti{un in March has vet to be done. Aqain, the Council did not direct "Staff to firmly uphold City standards of development". Zf~it Fiad, Mayor Stout's statsmrnt in May would have bean in conLlict. ,~j,~ EXwBiT "BS° Se F'-<b-i`iS1i 1$: ~b ~i.Ai '_Hfci~ 'wi.r Hill ~_ r _. -r .. -. _.. Chairman McNeil a Members of the Planning Commission Staff Reports for Environmental Assessment & Specific Plan 89-01 Staff Report for Environmental Assessment and Tentative Traets 14493 through 14498, 1x522, 14523 and Tentative Parcel Map 13128 September 25, 1990 Page Two 4. Environmental Smpact Report: Staff says we didn't respond to the request for additional funds for the EIR consultant. We did respond. We said both we and the consultants were surprised that such extensive additional work was suddenly required when it appeared the EIR was ready for circulation. Hy that time, the EIR had *_aken twice as long and cost three times as much as Staff's original estimate. S. Speeif is Plan Status: Detailed comments derived from city Staff's analysis of changes in development standards as well as other revisions made in the February 14, 1990 draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan have not been receive3 to date as implied in the April 3, 1990 Etiwanda North Project Status letter. The politically based letter of May 21, 1990 referred to by Sta££ wax not written until after the City had been informed we were transferring pro- cessing to the County. 6. County Processing: Processing of the Plan in the County was initiated to produce a better Plan in a more respectful and coopera- tive atmosphere. Staff tries to maintain we switched because of a "conf iict between the City's standards and the Cona ortium's density demands". That statement is untrue. 7. Applicant Intentions: Staff would give the impression we have not responded to diseusaions o£ City processing. To date, just in r...... - ..~ ~.,,. mittee andVStaff, the~Planning~COmmissiony(three tiimes), Hrad~and Rick (several times by phone; onoe in person) and the Mayor. With preparation time, I probably have spent more than 50 hours "responding". A. Summary: Sta Ef tries to maintain that density is a "key issue". it shouldn't be. The Consortium expects notriing more than to receive densities allowed by the County's General Plan and implicit in the City's General Plan. overall, those densities are lower than any other area in the City. Staff says we haven't responded to requests (which we believe were demands) to change the Specific Plan to reflect City standards. We have done this wherever w¢ thought it was not a detri- ment t0 the quality of the Plan or the long term interests Of the City, Soma of SCaf£'s demands are not in the Seat interests of the Plan or the City, and we will not submit to those demands. Regarding the Resolution you are being asked to approve, i believe Findings 3(a) and 4 are illogical and legally inappropriate. A Specific Plan cannot be "not consistent with the General Plan" if the General Plan Tows for specific plans, which ours does. That "environmental studies have not been completed, therefore the appli- cation is not in compliance with CEQA" is a Catch 22. How can anyone determine whether an application is in comp lianre with CEQA until the environmental studies are complete? V~~ Chairmen McNeil & Members o£ the Planning Commission Staff Report Yor Environmental Assessment 6 Speeifis Plan 89-01 Staff Report for Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tracts 14493 through 14498, 14522, 14523 and Tentative Parcel Map 13128 September 25, 1990 Page Three in closing, while we do not necessarily object to these resolutions, we do seek further clarification with respect to City policy and procedures as to why t@eae actions are required. The City is invited to stay current with our processing efforts and participate in the County process at the appropriate time. We look lorwazd to hearing from you and continuing to work towards a mutual understanding of all concerns. Yours truly, oaeyh N.N. Di~~~ President JND/jas cc: Supervisor Jon Mikele Mr. Tim Johnson Ms. Valerie Pilmer Mayoz Stout & City Council Members Mr. Rick Gomez Mz. Hrad Huller Mr. J. Ro4er Samu0laen Mr. Pete Dangarmond ~a~ STAFF ANALYSIS AND DO CU ME NTAT ICN LETTER Of SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 FROM MR. OIIORIO TO CNA IRMAN MCNIEL RE: SPECI FiC PLAN 89-01 AND RELATED MAPS The following analysis and Aoc umentation follows the numbered i*.em format of the subject letter and includes Lhe number plus the heading fcr the item. Following the heading is staff's analysis with documentation attached in the form of numbered exhi6i is or referenced. The subject letter is included in your staff report. "Park and Recreation Review:" Parks, trails, and opera space have been presented by the applicant as having high potential in the Etiwa nda North planning area. Planning Commission, Parks Commission, Trails Cpmmittee, and staff have reviewed and commented on a number of plans since discussion of the Eti wanda North Specific Plan began in 1988. From the first discussions, staff has emphasized that the City's General Plan policy requires that in undeveloped areas such as Eti wanda North, park sites 6e dedicated and developed acco rdinp to Citv soecifica ti nn as a condition of approval of development. A number of concept plans have been reviewed, including the February 1990 Eti wanda North Park Analysis prepared by Land Plan Design Group. Parks staff indicates that all the submittals, including the February 199C submittal, have been substantially identical and were identical to the sites revt ewed by the Parks Commission and the Planning Commission on September 7, 1989. Therefore, Lhe February 1990 submittal was not responsive to the commends previously forwarded to the applicant by the Parks Commission. Staff met with the applicant's consultant on February 26, 1990, to discuss the reasons why staff would be recommending denial of all dark sites 1n iha plan with the possi bie exec otion of Lhe Southern California Edison surplus land site if it could be pbtained. Staff recommendations were forwarded to the Parks Commission for their meeting of March 8, 1990, however, because the applicant did not appear, the item was continued. (See Etiwanda North Development Park Analysis Log, Exhibit "A-1", Staff Report to the Parks Commission, March 8, 1990, ~a9 LETTER OF SEP TEMD ER 2S, 1990 RE: SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 Page 2 Exhibit "A-2", Eti Wanda North Open Space Parks and Trails Plan, Exhibit "A-3", and Reference Community Services Project files.) In the subject application unencumbered property which the applicants own has not been identified for school and park use. Most of the park and school sites have been located on SB CF CD, Southern California Edison, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, or Mat ro politan water District land or easements. Most of these sites can be landscaped in a limited way, but are constrained from construction of penna nent facilities. Other site are encumbered by seismic faults, drainage e is eme nts, slope condition, ur other utility easements. City Parks policy is to not construct permanent facilities on such easements because of the h~gh probability of loss or replacement costs. It should be noted that the applicant, at the request of tte San Bernardino County flood Control District, has relocated two park and school sites within the Consortium's specific plan submittal to the County. In regard to the trafl s, it should be noted that most of tha trails are located on utility easements. Review by Coll ntv staff of the County submittal fnr the Ilnivarcity Crf~st application, indicates that many of the trails which are planned for the utility easements are based on the applicants' assumption that permission to use utility access roads will be granted by the utility and that nei4her improvements or maintenance is planned to he pro vided by the applicant. In regard to the equestrian facility, the SBCFCO has provided the City with a map of property owned in fee and easements, as well as made suggestions for future land uses. The SB CFCD is proposing devela pme nt of much of ~ts property. They are reserving same open space areas for Flood Control use, some for groundwater rech~irge, and some for mitigation areas as required by pcrn'ts for habitat al tera ton from the L'S. Corse of Engineers and California Oepa rtment of fish and Game. A mitigation area is always a natural habitat preserve and is usual}y an area of habitat enhancement with all totem ~a ti ble uses prohibited. Most of the proposed eque s~:rian site has been designated 6y the SBCFCO as a mitigaition site. Mr. Dtiorio's 10 acre parcel is under a fl and control easement and surroundr_d by the 33d LETTER OF SEP TEMD ER 25, 1990 RE: SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 Page 3 mitigation area. 0.n equestrian facility would not be compatible with a wildlife habitat mitigation area. therefore, the potential for Lhe si to for an equestrian facility is poor. (See Ezhi bit "B".) "City Council Review:" white the City Development Code provides tnat a Specific Plan may set its own standards, from the initial meetings on an Etiwanda North Specific Pi an, City staff indicated that the Etiwanda North Plan should build on the Etiwanda Specific Plan. As indicated in the introduction of the Specific Plan "The Etiwanda North Specific Plan is designed to extend the historical character, low density and neighborhood character of the original Etiwanda community of Rancho Cucamonga north and westward." It should be noted that residential standards in the Etiwanda Specific Plan achieve low density by being higher than standards in the City Development Code. It should be noted that City Council policy on annexation was set forth in Resolution 89-568 adopted November 28, 1989, requesting County support for "a11 development standards and policies of the City of Rancho Cucamonga." (See Exhibit "C".) 3. "Consortium's Draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan." Densi tv. Density in the applicant's Specific Plan a ppl ica t~pn has been an issue from the beginning. The applicant's premise is that historically the Cuunty has used an entitlement Standard, and therefp re, a calculation can be made in advance of development which establishes a unit count. On the other hand, historically, City unit counts are stated as a range and are based on a performance standard which requires extensive site analysis. Thus there has been tension between the concept of the entitlement method of calculating density and the performance method. This has been stated in a shorthand way as follows: "Staff will recommend approval of County bass density aro vided that Citv standards can be met." The February 14, 1990 screen check draft Specific Plan indicated that City standards comparable to the residential standards in the Etiwanda Specific Plan could not be met, as indicated by the reduction in lot sizes and setbacks. 33~ LETTER OF SEPTEMBER 25, i990 RE: SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 Page 4 The decrease in unit count from the July, 1989 preliminary draft plan is 328 units. Of these, 180 units were deducted to correct an error in the entitlement calculation by Landmark, but still included a request to the County by Landmark for a General Plan amendment to increase County Base densities. The remainder reflect changes in acreage calculations and zhanyes in aniL counts in appiica G ons processing in the City. However, it should be noted that the density stated in the screen check draft is not the anticipated built-out density of Eti wanda North. The San Bernardino County Flood Control Dist rf ct is the largest property owner in Eti wanda North. At Lhe urging of Mr. DiIorio, the District has identified properties that will soon be declared surplus in the future as a result of the completion of flood control facilities. SB CFCD has proposed potential land use designations for all land they expect to deem surplus. Discussions between the District and staff are continuing, but preliminary analysis indicated the proposals could result in up to 2,361 additional units. (See Estimated Dwelling Units for CFf,D's Proposed Land Uses, Exhibits "0-1" and City's Response, Ezhi bit "D-2".) Aiso, the plan creates a problem in regard to parcels not owned by consortium members. Staff analysis indicates that requests for higher densities would be made based on the lot size standards in the plan. Indeed, several requests Lo increase density have keen received in the City and the County from landowners. Overall densi tv of the Specific Plan. Eti wanda North cannot be compared to any other "Planned Community" protect in *.he City, because in both the County and City General Plan it is limt ted to single family residential development. further, much of Lhe area is unsuitable for development because of hazards such as flooding, steepness of slopes, seismic faults, or locatior. within the National Forest boundaries. Densities on the developable portions are proposed to be as high ar higher Lhan comparable developments in the City. (See companion Tract Map Stem on this agenda.) Detailed Staff review. The February 22, 1990 letter from Brad Bul er to Jess Harris was intended to indicate staff's concern about the direction the screen check ~~~ LETTER OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 RE: SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 Page 5 draft was taking to further reduce standards of development within the Specific Plan. (See Exhibit "E",) The "review" referred to in the letter was to policy direction and not to a line item review of the Specific Plan, unless the policy direction so indicated. Before the City's policy direction was finalized, the Consortium met with Supervisor Jon Mikels and County staff and filed applications in the County. !See Consortium Meeting Lo 1, Exhibit "F", and Reference Consortium file.) T he reduced standards proFos ed in the February screen check draft Specific Plan Look staff 6y complete surprise. The first ment'~on of =hem occurred at the February Consortium meeting February 1, 1990. Staff attended that meeting and orally requested that a letter from the Consortium explaining their new proposal be sent to Mr. Buller. In lieu of a letter, Mr. Harris scheduled a meeting on February 13, 1990 and included the reduced standards concept on an agenda with a number of other items, indica tiny the proposal was only a "minor" change in the Specific Plan. Upon receipt o.^. February 15, 1990 of the screen check draft Specific Plan, staff noted that the 10 percent lot size reduction was across the board in every sub-area and would open the wav to re auectc 4nr ;"~.e>c oc +.. density from landowners. Because the density in the Specific Plan could not be c cap, but only a minimum, staff sought policy direction first from the City Council, because that bode has historically been involved in developne nt agreenie nt negotiations. After the City Council app ^oved preparation of the City's Specific Plan on June 20, 1990, and approved a contract for consultant services on July 11, 1990, an analysis was forwarded to the City's Specific Plan consultant. The analysis in the form of red line markup of the June 1989 preliminary draft Specific Plan, was forwarded to the consultant, along with all Planning Commission workshop minutes and all staff Technical Review concnents. .See Plannf nn Cmm~; cc; ~" i_~,. Exhibit "G", Technical Review Log, Exhibit "N", and reference Specific Plan Pro,l ect files.) It should be noted that the entl re develo pne nt standards section of the applicant's plan was deemed unacceptable and deleted. The proposed development standards section will reflect residential development standards in the E tiwanda Specific Plan and restore performance criteria ~ 3-3 LETTER DF SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 RE: SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 Page 6 for es to 6lishf ng unit counts. This is consistent with Development Code criteria for a Specific Plan in that the standards are proposed to be higher than those in the general City. "Environmental Smoa ct R~rt_" Additional funds. Additional funds requested were for analysis of the Austin Faust Traffic Study when completed, for anai ysis of the Resource Management Plan when com of eted, and for project management which had become much more interactive with the re5 po nsi 6le agencies and the applicant than originally anticipated. The environmental sensitivity of the site, as well as the undeveloped nature of the site, has resulted in complexities which have yet to be resolved. Time and cost of the EIR up to Fe br uary 1990. The original cost estimate was based on the applicant's statement that all the necessary reports and studies would be complete and submitted with the Specific Plan appl ira Lion. The application was received on February 3, 1989. Several pounds of studies were attached. (See Eti wa nda North Bibliography, Exhibit "I".1 Standard environmental studies such as the air quality and noise analysis were not included and were added to cne icy consul tangs work order. Other key studies have still not been comol eted including a Resource Management Plan and an Infrastructure Phasing Plan. City consultants will be requested to provide these missing documents for the City's Specific Plan. The aeplica nt's Traffic Report was deemed Trade qua to and the most recent report must be revised one more time to accurately reflect proposed land uses in addition to residential uses, then the air quality study must 6e reviewed and revised as necessary. (See Traffic Report Status Log, Exhibit "K" and Reference Engineering Project files.) "Specific Plan Status." See item 3 above. (Also, see attached Specific Plan Correspondence Log, Exhibit "J" and Reference Specific Plan Project files.) "County Processing." Staff's understanding is that the Consortium went to the County because of the conflict between density and standards. Other reasons were also given at the. April Consortium rteeti ng. (See Summary of Consortium meetings, Exhibit "F", and Reference Consortium file.) L~ ~T LETTER OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 RE: SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 Page 7 "Applicant Intensiens." Staff cannot speak for the applicant. 8. "Summary." See above items. At*.achments: Exhibit "A-1" - Etiwa nda North Park Development Log Exhibit "A-2" - Staff Report to Parks Commission, March 8, 1990 Exhibit "A-3" - Eti Wanda North Parks and Open Space, Parks and Trails Map Exhibit "B" - Proposed Equestrian Facility Location Ma p Exhibit "C" - Resolution 89-568 Exhibit "D-1" Estimated Dwelling Units for CFCD's Proposed Land Uses Ex ht bit "D-2" - City's Response Exhibit "E" - February 22, 1990 Letter from Brad Buller to Jess Harris Exhibit "F" -Consortium Meeting Log Exhibit "G" - Planning Commission No rks hop Log Exhibit "H" - Technical Review Log Exhibit "I" - Etiwanda North Biblfoara ohv Exhibit "J" - Traffic Report Status Log EzM bit "K" - Specific Plan Correspondence Log ~~~ Etiwanda North Development Park Analysis Log October 10, 1990 Prepared by Earen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner AIIGIIBT 1989 3 Memo to Larry Henderson, Senior Planner and Miki Brett, Associate Planner Prom Dave Leonard, Park Project Coordinator re: Etiwanda North Draft Specific. Plen dated June 15, 1989 and those items requiring resolve by the Comm~xnity Services Department and the Park and Recreation Commission - Items included: 1) Park locations and sizes. 2) Specific site information (topography, utility easements etc.) 3) Areas proposed for development adjacent to an including utility corridors/long term easements and Memorandums of Understanding, and 4) Methods of funding. (:c: Park and Recreation Commission, Joe Schultz, Raren Emery, Joe DiIorio). 9 Meet.inq between Joe Diiorio, Cary:~ Development, Jess Harris, Stave Kelly of Lan<I Plan Design Group, Joa Schultz, Dave Leonard, Raren Emery, Discussed sizes of neighborhood pt:rk facilities within the development as well Ee methods of funding. 10 Department review of Statistical 3~mmarv o2 the nciwanda Nortn Specific Plan Park Calculations -total of park acreage proposed versus proposed budget versus current constructior. costa. 17 Regul¢trly scheduled Park and Recreatf on Commission meeting Discussion of North Etiwanda Development, Hrad Buller, City Planner and Miki Brett, Associate Planner present. 1. Locations and sizes of proposed pa.^ks. 2. Site specific information - topo, utility easements. 3. Uae of utility corridors/long term leases. 4. Method of funding. 5. Development of a Park Iaplementaticn Agreement workshop date oP September 7, 1990 with Planning Commission set. 31 Memo to Hrad Buller, City Planner Proni Miki Brett re: Etiwanda North Parka - Recommendation: that item be discussed nt joint Planning Coxwieaion end Park and Recreation Commission xieetinq of Septemba•.r 7, 1990. Due to the "COS ts" - the original Etiwanda North concept of an integrated perk an~i open apace plan wa• viable. Proposed parks no longer appear minimally adequate. 3, j ,( EXtNB1T A -i SEPTHMBHR 1989 7 Joint meeting between Planning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission. General consensus -Site locations are generally suitable, unencumbered usable park acreage determines park credit therelora a grading study must be submitted - usable acreage must yield 5 scree net..... SEE ATTACHED MINUTE9 21 Park and Recreation Commission regularly seheduled meeting. North Etiwanda Park allocation on the Agenda. Item deferred to October 1989. OCTOBER 1989 lG Park and Recreation Commission regularly scheduled meeting. North Etiwanda Park Allocation on the Agenda. Mr. DiIOrio, applicant present. SEE ATTACHED MINUTES. 13 Memo for Park and Recreation Commission from Joe Schultz. Subject - North Etiwande Park Allocation. Response to items discussed at September 7, 1989 joint meeting. JANUARY 1990 18 Regularly scheduled Perk and Recreation Commission meeting. Etiwande North on agenda, applicant did not rnnaa.~ avo wmmw'.voC .. .. 23 Memo to Miki Hratt lrom Raren McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner. subject - Response to Etiwanda North Draft EIR. Planning Department to provide response to applicant. 3o Letter to Jerry Pulwoed, Joe Schultz from Jos Diiorio ra: Southern Celifornin Edison surplus property. ~~' EXF~IT A -1 FEHRIIARY Memo to Brad Buller from Joe Schultz by Karen McGuire-Emery re: Response to Etiwanda North Draft ELR list of items generated in response to park issues i.e., dedicated park land on unencumbered, non-restricted land. Parcel to be minimum 5 acres net. etc. (cc: Larry Henderson, Miki Brett, Dave Leonard). 15 Regularly scheduled Park and Recreation Commission meeting. North Etiwanda on Agenda. Stott reported that although requested, the Etiwanda North Park Analysis from the Consortium was not provided in time for staff to do a detailed study. item deferred to March 1990. 26 Memo to Jos Schultz from Karen McGuire-Emery ec: Dave Leonard, Mikl Brett re: Etiwanda North Perk Analysis dated February 2, 1990 - review o! specific proposed park sites in Etiwanda North Planned Development. Report included etaft~s recommendation to deny approval of 6 out of e sites. 26 1x:45 Meeting Scheduled with applicant, Joe DiIOrio to discuss site Specilic analysis o! proposed parks in Etiwanda North. Applicant did not appear however ateft met with hie representative Jees Herrin of Land Plan Design Grown and M nnna.eA ~^~: ioa .,, a;,ouy approval of 6 out of a park sites. MARCH Scheduled Park and Recreation Commission meeting, Agenda Item Etiwanda North Park Analysis dated February 2, 1990. Applicant not present at meating...SEE ATTACHED MEMO TO THE PARR AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND MEETING MINUTES. APRIL 19 Regularly scheduled Park and Recreation Commission meeting. Agenda item Etiwanda North Project status discussed. Stott grevided update that applicant is px~ceedinq through the County and that stet! will work with the County in recommending same park development standards as currently exist in the city. EXMBIT A - t C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: March 8, 1990 To: Members of the Park and Recreation Commission From: Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager ey: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner Subject: Etiwanda North Park Analysis dated February 2, 1990 Staff has reviewed the Etiwanda North Park Analysis presented by the Consortium and hee prepared the following comments and recommendation for each park location. Please review this information for future discussion of these proposed Locations. Staff does not anticipate a repr•aentative lrom the Caryn Company or the Consortium at this meeting, however, staff will be prepared to answer any questions the Commission might have regarding the proposed plan. Location - D1 • Posef blv lerat•A in fh. e•A x1 t_i p..ar ~,.... • Lesa than flw scree net (unencumbered land). • Reversal of the school/park locations as requested in joins meeting between PC and PRC (9/21/89) has not been accompllahed. Evan if this ware to be aceompliahad, school site now shows 2t" S.D. proposed (Tent P.M. No. 19128, doted 12/15/89). Therefore, school site is "encumbered." Also, Psrcel 2 (proposed park site) on thle map ahowa (1) proposed t8" 3.D., (2) Proposed S" sewer, (3) proposed 25~ public utility eaeenent. Thezelore, this portion la also encumbered. w it the park ie to be located adjacent to a school site, eta!! requests review o! the school plan. • staff requests review of the surrounding to,pogrnphy. • Both school and park facilities are to be sizefl so that they can exist lndrpandent of one another: staff Racommandation: Deny approval of proposed park site !or credit. Require relocation o! park site. 3 ~ ~ EXHBIT A-2 Park & Recreation commission Pays 2 Location - D2 • Request in joint meeting between PC and PRC (9/21/69) to reloca[e park site out of flood plain has not been accomplished. • Current site possibly in Fad Hill Fault Zane. • Staff requests relocation of park site into development to east. Staff Recommendation: Deny approval of proposed park site for credit. Requlre relocation of park site. Location - D3 • Located in Red Hill Fault Zona. • Per joint PRC/PC Meeting (9/21/89), not suitable for park credit. ,staff Recommendation: Deny approval for park credit. Location - M • Per proposed plan, grades are not within range of "developable land." • Bika lane required to be deleted lroa "groae park acreage." • Per joint PRC/PC M•etlna /oi» ioo~ .li _ -- -- „~ Edison surplus lend are to be~obteinid (east of Day Croak Blvd.). Staff Recommendation: Provide surrounding topography; redesign facility; leeaen grade on park site; resubmit. • Landmark park site is pQt to be included in acreage figure or proposed costa for parka credit within Etiwanda North Developaent at this tide. Landmark Development i• procesaing their project independent of the Consortiua. • No elope plan provided. • Entire efts is equeatrien use only. • Corral located lean than 30^ off of Day Creek Blvd. • No park aseniti•a provided, i.•., play area, reatrooa, exercise station, picnic tabl•a, shade atructurea. Staff Recommendation: Deny park credit. ~i ~ EXFNBIT A-2 Park 6 Recreation Commission Pegs 3 • No slops plan provided. • Entire Bite is equestrian use only. • How is this site accessed by vehicles? • Sita is apparently located on flood control property. Stalt Recommendation: Deny park esedit. Location N DS • Require surrounding topography (for review o! sites surrounding community park sits). • Per joint PC/PRC Meeting (9/21/89), applicant was requested to dedicate a ainiaua o! 25 acres (!or loss of horse property within Equestrian Overlay Zone. No park credit is to be awarded for equestrian canter. • Delete $1,000,000 tram Park 1lnalyeie Sumary, TaDla 1. Statt Recommendation: Deny park credit, deny landing out of park aonies. General Nota • In addition, all iteas discussed at ioint Pq/Pnc weer~~n (Y/fl/tlY) apply. • eta!! requested khat iteae being submitted !or a park credit be separated from those items Laing provided by the consortium. JS/R8/kle cc: Dave Leonard, Park Projects Coordinator Miki Brett, Hesociate Planner y~ EXFIIBIT A-2 ~L- n i _ my 4~. _. ~~ 1 ~' „• ;,,tee, -„a alt. -, . ~ i ` - ~':rF:=' /~ r ` ~ 1 D.i • .i~l~ I_• - •~ ~ w., ro.a _ « r.r.-. ^ ar - LEGEND - ® PARxB ~Fi6' .~~~ OPEN SPACE RE9WEnn"l ® 61000 CONiROI CNAHNEL PROpOBED EOUE9: RIAN CENTER ® LRAk NfA0 .k ^UEJECL TO GUIDRE OVERLAY W/•Ln MAY INCLUDE RESWENTIAL URC OPEN SPALE AND/Oq PUBLIC UAEB NOiE D.! DARN IOLAt1pN IS dAOgAMAIk ONLY iME EAACi LpCATIL`N Alq 91ZL~ MAY VARY OPFN SPACE AgEA9 MAY NAVE LMMiFO OEVELOPA![Nt REPER TO THE OEVfIOIMENi REGULAipN9 W nlf 4IECMk PLAN. w :~ ~ i INNMMM 91CYCLE igA0. nM fnan NIPlFIR BICYCLE TgAA iar vnun OfSx.N ~~~~~ REGIONAL tRAE ~RU111` OOOGG WAINMDIMNMq igAL9 EXHIBIT 14 .Ao.+.~ V gM „Ey'""'"""E OPEN SPA A CE .-' WALxwc,r"xINdTRAILxEY PARKS AND TRAILS PLAN TIW ND ORTH 3~~- ~,I ~< IEXFMBIT A-3 a I11 W W'I ` ~~~ii~i~il tT O / O /~~~i ~.. ~ / R S/ i C~"a~_ c ~ 3NyQ i. ~ Ha5 O J _~ = INIY s ~~ Z V _ _ /~ i %= % Z ~ ~~ m _.~. ` Q Q gg~?~ ~-~:~.- ~ - y(` ~ I~iAY 15Y3 a -~;W ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ - ( ~.i0 3AY YON VM~12 - ' LL Q -_ O LL ~ ~ u, „~ t~ m n _ \o\ ; i ~Q 1u`~ \ W V ~`,~ ~ N P " a 1 ~- ~b~ Y33tl0~ ~ ~ u~ W I <~-~I r = ~ /rf ~OWIOYU ON01I3Yq NcNM riYY'J CVO Q m iJy1 ~-lfyTRl~~ _ _ , W - - - _ , ~ EXFNEUT B i J RESOLUTION N0. 89-568 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORK IA,_REQUESTING THE SUPPORT OF THE SAN BE ANARDI NO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERV tSORS RELATIVE TO THE CITY ACTIONS TO ANNEX THE ETIWIINDA NORTH SPHERE AREA NH EREAS, the City has always mai ntni ned that our sphere of influence is vital to the welfare of our community because of geogra Dhic location, inter-connection of drainage, circulation, topography, environmental and service relationships; and WHEREAS, the City desires to foster the expeditions and logical annexation of said sphere of infl uenee; and, NHE REAS, the San, Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has expressed interest in fostering improved sub-regional and local cooperation in planning; and WHEREAS, the opportunities are now present to enable a coordinated approach to land use and development in the sphere; and WHEREAS, the City desires consistency in development patterns and regulations between the City's sphere of Snfl uenee and the City; and WHEREAS, the City feels that the dichotomy between County and City development regulations, policies, and standards entourages developers to play one against the other, therefore, frustrating any annexation attespts;:and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to ensure environmentally, as well as economically sound planning for the sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the annexation of said sphere' 1s a .key factor. to, tMe successful moderation of density, use of compatible development standards, coordination of infrastructure facilities and ultimete development of the area. NOM,~THEREFORE, tha~Ctty Council of the City of Raocho Cucamonge~does hereby resolve as followsi ., „ _ ,, 1. The Ctty requests the cooperation and consent of the County 1n annextn4 all Cowty-owned ltnd withis._ Rancho Cucaaionga's sphere of infl uenee; 2. The City requests the Board of Supervisors support for the City's efforts to annex the raisatnder of it's northern sphere; ~3, The County grant to the City through a cooperative agreanent review and processing of all planning and develop~ent proposals (with all reQuislte processing fees) within the sphere of infiwnee, while having the County retain it's aplpr`o/va/l authority; ~7 T EXHBIT C Resolution No. 89-568 Page 2 4. The City urges the Board of Supervisors to adopt a post ti on that all development within the Rancho Cucamonga sphere of influence be required to follow and adhere to all development standards and pot tei es of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and 5. The Board of Supervl sots rnnslder a 90-120 day suspension of development applications in our sphere of influence to enable the proper planning and coordination Of pnltcies between the C1ty and the County, end tML a technical committee comprised of City and County staff be treated to Study Sue. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 28th day of November, 1989. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Brawn, Stout, Nright NOES: None ABSENT: None enn s tout, ayor ATTEST: ra Ly er c i, DEBAA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the C1ty of Ranch Cucamonga, California, do Aereby certify that tM foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by tM C1ty Council of tM City of Ranch Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of sold C1ty Caunell Mid on tM 28th day of November, 1989. Executed this 29th day of November, 1989 at Ranch Cucamonga, ~Caiifornta. ra s, LyZTerTc - ~~ EXF~IT C '~ ~~, f ~~ 'off.- i ice.; .. .. ~~ ~ y,,, ~ , ~ -,' ~; ,~. _ - _ h _ ~ @. J' :49 i' i r ~ p, I _ ~ I r ~ ~ .S' ~~ -_ _ ~ ~ ~ "~aS ~~~ ~-~r t i ~~.~ . `t-' ~ l 4 ~ ~ ~ w t p i ~C W~ ~o ~ C . t r 3 ~+6 EXFN8IT a1 ~. ~,p ~ ~.~~:- - ~ =,_ _ `s-' =~ W fig' c i~G =_,~C = ~` S~ s. . y a • V \ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ A _ ~o W " ,_ ~Y-- ~_ ap p : r.,: - =_ gi o., L~,_~,_ _ p . ~ ~o ~ ;~ ~ ~ q:W o ~ s J °'S- ' 1 ~~~¢I~ .~Za.. ~ W f7 = _ _. n tF _ ... ~a~a: ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ' o ' r ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ 4 i p.~ ' ; ~ i ~. r ~~~ r p Q g , , ~ ~ i ' ' ' 3 ~ v4C ~~ p f ~ ~ ~ ~ . ; E . i ~ _ _ p '* _ ~ r ~ j I - 3 ~ ~ I $e"~s'ge ~ " ' r 2 ~ ~ I > - ¢ V e ~ • ' ¢r __ ~ _ va~m .tr..~~ae ~p -~ ~~ _ _ ~ irra ~ - 2 s s ~pY ~ w - = : s - _ ~p L e p a e i; ~ mJ~/ ~ p EXF~'r D-2 C17Y OF RANCFIO CUCAMONGA Pa,t Clfice fio, 9~, a•na~o C~nmonp, C•h(omu 9189. pll{ 9l4i851 February 22, 1990 Mr. Jess Harris Land Plan Design Group 134 Executive Park, Suite 150 Irvine, CA 92714 SUBJECT: ETINANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN SCREEN CHECK DRAFT, FEBRUARY, 1990 Dear Jess: Ten copies of the February 14, 1990 screen check draft Specific Plan have been received. Substantial changes in development Standards are proposed in this draft. These proposed changes will require detailed staff review and coasnent. They will also require policy direction from the Planning Conission and the City Council, it is anticipated it will take 2 to 4 weeks to complete this review and get policy direct ton. In the meantime, there is na firm basis far review of tract map applica ttons in the Speet fie Plan area. Therefore, staff will be unable to continue processing tract maps until these changes are reviewed and policy direc Lion from the decision makers is received. [f you have any questions, please call Larry Henderson or Miki Bratt at (714) 989-1861. Sincerely, COlMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAT DIV (~S¢~ i Bra er City P1 nner BB :MB/,)fs cc: Joe DiIorto Tracy Hatg Development Co. Shtntu Bose Betty Miller Dan Coleman Beverly Nissen Larry Henderson Mikt Bratt ~° y ~ ' E EXF1~11 " c..,•,I.,.w„ M•w. WiIWm 1 Ahunder Charln I~ augwt it my M•u,o pnnu L. Srou1 Deborah N. crown Pamela 1. Wriah, lack Lim. AICP CONSORTIUM OF STIWANDA NORTH LANDOWNERS MONTHLY MEETINGS JANUARY 1990 - Screen Check Draft EIR reviewed by Consortium; Traffic Report incomplete; City requests that traffic impacts be reviewed on City Gravity Model; cost $34,000. TriLl9 C02mittee reQleaL9 25 acre equestrian center site and phase I development be donated to mitigate loss of equestrian property in equestrian overlay zone. Dilorio negotiating with SBCFCD regarding use oP Plood Control properties Por school and park sites; golf/residential development; and habitat mitigation. SCE surplus lands may be acquired and used for park requirement. LPD prepering Screen Cheek draft 9pecif is Plan. PEBRUARY 1990 - Miki Brett attended. LPD has prepared an Etiwande North Park analysis which includes conceptual park layouts and estimated costa. •uy pvyvevu u F1ood,Control•property for future v development; Jon MSkels reviewing Consortium's proposals. DSIOrio negotiating purchase of 5S scree oP SCE Burp lus property otPered Por $2 million. LPD discussed reduction of lot sizes to meet 60'ROW requirement - Average lot reduction 500 eq. ft; equestrian lot reduction Prom 20,000 to 19,000 square feet, minimum 18' drivewsy length, minimum setback Prom face of curb 30 ' reduce minimum lot depth by 6', reduce rear yard setbacks; Brett requested latter to Buller dlscuaaing these changes in SpacilSc Plan standards. Resource Mansgement Plan in DraDaration. MARCN 1990 - Larry Henderson and MSki Brett attended: EIR put on hold pending receipt of additional lunch from Consortium; SBCFCD meeting to be held tin response to Consortium propoesl Eor land development; / ~~ City atstt explained lot size concern on C~ University tract; City staff suggeFsxts~T ~ that plans utilizing smaller lot sizes not be submitted for review pending review of the Sasue by the Htlwanda North sub-committee of the City Council. DSIorio responded that lot sizes Were governed by County density and Thai overall density oS Specific Plan had been reduced from 5408 dwelling units to 5060 dwelling unite. (Landmark count reduced Prom 800 to 620, remainder due to acreage adjustments or tract map processing revisions.) City staff requested matrix of density transfers. Henderson eteted that the Pebruary Specific plan emphasized the conflict between City Standards and density and that he believed the decision mekmra were going So emphasize support for City standards. APRIL 1990 - Larry Henderson and Mikl Brett attended; Consortium members had held several preliminary meetings with County etalf: Consortium members unanimously agreed to process specific Plan appllcetien Sn the C~~...y. Lm•dmaric~e property co oe excluded. U/Greet to be includefl. However, DSIOrSo will activate U/Greet project Sn the County. County Flood control properties will retain their existing County General Plsn deaSgnatlona. Reasons were stated for County processing: o City does not honor Dev. Agreements o Cost of Police CPD o Hold on tentative tract maps unfair because only "minor" issues Sii"voived, i.e. minimum iot size to accommodate 60' ROW and density transfers o City Hnpineering Division "out of control" o In general City review process okay o City pursuit of flood Control Lands Policy unreasonable because it will take up to 2 ysarm to resolve 3 r 7~ o lack of access to City Council ~ (/ EXl~IT F o EIR mitigation measure expected to be unreasonable o County support of County processing MAY 1990 - Miki 8ratt attended: City discussing preparaticn of Sgecitic Plan and completion of SIR; MBA to remain City consultant St City elects to complete EIR. County densities acceptable only if City Standards can be maintained. JUNE 1990 - Rick Gomez and Brad Buller attended: ConeortSum requested using City 6IR. JULY 1990 - City staff did not attend: Covnty County preparing R8P for BIR for Specific Plan; City Gravity model completed and results forwarded to County for review o! U/Great pro~eet. AUGUST 1990 - canceled ~~~ EXF~IT F ?LANNINO COMMISSION WORKSHOPS SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 SBPTEMBBR 22, 1988 OVERVIEW, COMMUNITY DESIGN OCTOBER 30, 1938 DSCHMSHR S, 1988 JANUARY 23, 1989 FEBRUARY 3, 1989 MARCH 3, 1989 MARCR 30, 1989 JUNE 22, 1989 JDLY 20, 1999 AUGUST 30, 1989 SEPTEMBER T, 1989 ELEMENTS, ARCRITSCTURB, GRADING OVBRVZEW ANp COlE1ISSION CONCERNS PLANNING CONCEPTS PRBLZMINARY DRAHT PRHSBNTATION COMMISSION AND STAFF RESPONSH BUTNHR DISCUSSION OH CONTHNT PLAN AND ARCEITECTURAL DESIGN CONCEPT AND PURPOSE OB PLAN PRELIMINARY REVIEW OB TNS RILLSIDB DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE PRESENTATION O1 RILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE REVZEW PARES ELEMENT ~~ EXF#IT G SPECIFIC PLAN 89-O1: TECHNICAL REVIEW LOG (OCTOBER 6, 1988 LPD/STAFF DRAFT DESIGN CONCEPTS] (JANUARY 17,19@4 : LPD/STAFF 1ST PP.ELIMIHAP,Y DP.P.FT ENSP] [PEBRUARY 2, 1989: LPD/STAFF PRELIMINARY DRAFT A'2] MARCH 1, 1989: ENGINEERING/PLANNING COMMENTS ON PRELIMINARY DRAFT N2 - TRAFPIC; CIRCULATION; GRADING, G@NERAL [MARCH 1, 1989: LPD/STAPF ARCHITECTURE GVIDELINESj MARCH 1, 1989: PLANNING STAFF/COLHMAN PRELIMINARY RESPONSE TO PRELIMINARY DRAPT +t2 MARCH 3, 1989: PLANNING STAPF/COLEMAN ADDITIONAL COMMHNTS ON PRELIMINARY DRAFT ~-2 MARCH 3, 1989: ENGZNHP.RING/PLANNING COMMENTS ON DRAFT •2 MARCH 3, 1989: CCWD/HENDERSON COMMENTS ON FEBRUARY DRAPT •°•••+•• ~ ~+~+ ~ii% - --c'uIiiiimn7 ncricn iv urinal SPECIFIC•PLAN N0. 2 MARCH 20, 1989:MZLLBR/BRATT COMMENTS ON DRAFT .f2 APRIL 6, 1989: CCWD/CITY COMMENTS APRIL 13, 1989:8RATT/HENDERSON TRC POR APRIL 18, 1989 CANCELED BECAUSH OF INADHQUATE GRADING REVISIONS APRIL 14, 1989;LPD/PLANNING RESPONSE TO ENGINEERING COMMENTS DATED 3/20/69 [APRIL 27,1989:LPD/STAFF APRIL 27, 1989 DRAFT ENSP] [JUNE 23, 1989: LPD/STAPP: DRAFT ENSP] JULY 24, 1989: COLEMAN/HENDERSON COMMENTS ON JUNE 1989 DRAFT SPECIFIC PLAN JVLY 24, 1989; CCWD/PLANNING COMMENTS ON JUNE 1989 DRAFT AUGUST 1, 1989:MILLER/NHNDER90N COMMHNTS ON HNSP AUGUST 1, 1989:POLICE/PLANNING COMMHNT9 ON DRAFT SPECIFIC PLAN 53 EXHIBIT H AUGUST 7, 1989:LPC/HENDERSON RESPONSE TO JULY 26, 1989 MEMORANDUM BY COLEMAN AUGUST 30, 1989:COLEMAN/HENDERSON RESPONSE AUGUST 7, 1989 LETTER SEPTEMBER 22, 3989: HARRIS/MILLER RESPONSE TO TRC COMMENTS OP AUGOST 1, 1989 [HILLSIDE GRADING ORDINANCE IN PROCESS] [FEBRUARY 16, 1990, SCREHN CHECK DRAPT SPECIFIC PLAN] S~ EXF~IT N REFERENCES POR ETIWANDA NORTH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Responses to NOP+ General Plan• Development Code• General Plan Master Env. Assessment General Plan EIR+ Etiwanda Speclf is Plan• West Valley Community Foothills Plan EIR• EN Specific Plan Preliminary Draft X2• EN ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES o Biological Assessment for Portions of Etiwanda Specific Plan• o North Etiwanda Specific Plan Cultural Resources Aasessment• o Conf identlal Information North Etiwanda Speclf is Plan• Cultural Resource Assessment• o Communtiy Facilities aummary• o Seismic summary• o North Etiwanda Study Area TraffSc Analaysis Revised January 23, 1989+• o Traf Pic Noise Impact Study o n~.. ~..~1~.~. T.,n,v~t Ana7vvlR• U/Crest EIR (Not CertiPiedl. o Draft EIR U/Greet Projeci• o Biological Resources Assessment • o Historical and Archeological Investigations of the Etiwanda Roek Cairns' c Biological Resources Assessment U/CresN o Noise Study V/Crest• o Air Quality Impact Aesesamant for U/Creat+ Development Plan W138-49 Etiwanda Hiphlanda. o An Archeological Assessment of a Stobne Foundation Located in the Etiwanda HIghlande of San Bernardino County Cal o Biological Resources Assessment Etiwanda/San Sevaine• C planning Aneg pima Other o Draft EIR Etiwanda Helghts (Not Cert if Sed)• o Etiwanda Helghte Seismic Study• o Etiwanda Heights sewage etudy* o Cordiero Drainage Study ~~~ o Cordiero Geology etudy+ o Engineering Geology Peaeibility and Subeurf ace InvestSgation Sections 20 and 29• o Engineering Geology and Subeurf ace Inveatigatlon N 1/a of Section 20• o Preliminary Oeotechnlcal PeaeSbility Evaluation Waesem Property• ~. T ~ o Seismic, Roach" o Seismic, Frank" o Seismic, Mistretta" On File MBA. o Rancho Etiwanda FUD final Supplemental EIR ;Certified; prepared by MHA o dth Street Rack Crusher final EIR (Certified) prepared by MHA Requested from Consortium for MHA 7/19/89. o Infrastructure Phasing Report for EN Consortium, 6y FWLS, June 30, 1989. o Etiwanda Creek Drainage Corridor, Design Concept Report, by FWLS, June 30, 1989. o EN Draft Specific Plan, by L/P/D Por EN Consort Sue, June 23, 1989. o Htiwanda North Study Area Traff lc Analysis for HN Consortium by DKS, revised Aug. 7, 1989, original Appendix A. o Fiscal Impact Report for 8N Consortlum, July 1989 o Draft EN Pire Study for R.C. fire Dleirict, by Hunt as avialable ~~ = --~ ~ - _e - - ar uc ~oyuao you from FWLS.~ o Day Creek/EtSwandn Creek/Sen Sevaine Drainage Area Master Environmental Impact Report/Statement Day Creek Water Project, Day, Etiwanda, and San Sevaine Creeks Drainage Plan, Master Plan for the San Sevaine Channel for S.H. Co. Flood Control, Planning Network, Bill Man, Aug. 1983, certified 7/10/85. o Hnvironmental Aseeoement San Sevaine Creek Water Project, March 198T, Engineering Science for S.B.CO flood Control Etiwsnde DrsSnage Plan. o EtSwenda Area Master Plan of Drainage, for City Rancho Cucamonga, BSI, 1989 o final Hnvironmental Aaeesament Day Creek Weter Project, for S.B.Co, flood Control by Planning Network/Hill Mann, e~p~e.^.Der 19SS. ~Tranemitted to MBA 3/3/89 '"Transmitted to MBA 5/19/89 ~~ EXM~1T ~ '~aB F--=IWANOA Noxa1 SPECIE*_c RLAN ~.1:~.,t-.~.~ ~g/~`~n :Y'affic Stvdies Chronology late :ten Commnts 8/1/88 Kunzman Study !0/25/88 Maud: Russ to Larry Comtlents on Ku[u~nan Study - method not comprehensive - +.ise 13.25 trSP generation - street design guidelines 12/15/88 Kunzman Revised 2/3/89 Letter: Russ/Diorio Review of Kunaten n~risic^s - method in~adecpnate far growth management - C1ty traffic model will be available to developers 3/1/89 Letter: DiIorio/BUSS Reacticv, to issues raised - propose regional fee - DKS hired - disagree re Vintage, curve in 24th, etc 3/14/89 Meeting: DiIorio, DKS, LPD, FYgitleerirg staff 4!11/89 Letter: DKS/Paul Meeting Followlip - Fuck Crusher impacts - Protection of Etiwanda Ave - 24th St. curve - Sizicg oP Cherry Ave - ?bsc~ltian of Vintage Dr 5/16/89 Letter: Fuse/D1IOrio Provide a comprehensive stud}'; stop subeittirg arglmlents in letter form b/22 /89 DK5 Study received 7/10/89 letter: Fuss/DSIorio Study received; month to resprnd - only alts are "prefelzcai" var'_atlons --.i:p ~Liai iv I¢1 L1gaT:~l - lane cmtlguratlons for all alts 7/13/89 Letter: DKS/Buss Pesponve to coenlalts B/1/89 DKS Study insert received 8/10/89 Revised DKS 5ttsty leceived 8/25/89 Revisiore to insert Sn O1(5 Study received 9/22/89 Letter: Ruse/DiIOrio Review of DKS Study, as revised - Dnn't assume 4 lanes on Highland - Vae V/C ratios, rot ICU's 10/11/89 Letter: DKS/Ruse Reepaive to ccaments 11/8/89 Revised DKS Study received 11/29/89 Letter: DKS/Betty Memo to acca~any report forthcoming !2/1/89 Letter: Betty/DKS Coat estimate for City's consultant to complete additional studies should be available at same time 1[174 iF4 °'~r'.it1 ~ r;.T2:j r2a:2iYed 12/21/89 Letter: Ruse/DSIOrio Provide $30,000 for ue to run model for P175P; 10-12 weeks t0 car~plete 1/12/90 DSIorio check received 1/15/90 Cgltract sent to Austin-Foust (A-F) 1/31(90 New DKS 6ccutive 9emlary received 2/15/90 DSIOrSo letter re Circulation Issues ¢/16/90 A-P Startup meeel~ (D16 attended) 5/25/90 Merv: Rues to Council Response to DiIorio's letter to Mikels on 5!1/90. Model ccepleted Sn 1/90. 7/5/90 Dralt A-F Study received; copy foiwslded to County 7/18/90 Meeting: City staff, Camty slat!, DiIorfo, D16, LPO r3,'1 7 EXFNBIT J SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 MEETING/CORRESPONDANCE LOO FEBRUARY 13, 1990 JESS }IARRIS, LPDG, MBT W/ LJH NOTIFIED CITY THAT LOT SIZHS IN FEBRUARY SCREEN OHBCK DRAFT SP HAVE BERN REDUCED 10% ACROSS THH BOARD TO "MAKH UP FOR" INCREASE OF ROW ON CUL DE SAC STREHTS FROM 50' TO 60': WILL SEND SEPARTH LETTER ON THIS ISSUH. FEBRUARY 15, 1990 30 COPIES OP SCRHBN CHHCK DRAFT SP RECEIVED; LOT 9I2E9 REDUCBD 10% ACROSS THE BOARD; DHVSLOPMHNT STANDARDS INADEQUATE LOWER THAN CITY DBVBLOPMENT STANDARDS AND MOCH LOWER THAN HTIWANDA SP STANDARD9; ONIT COUNT ASSIGNMENT TO 9UBAREA9 PROVIDES UIPBARNBD GAIN TO NONCONSORTIUM MEMBERS AND MAY 8E INAPPROPRIATE; UNIT TRANSFBR9 MADE PROM CR63T TO VARIOUS SOB-AREAS INADEQUATELY DOCUMENTED; UNIVERSITY I11NC 1TV ApT •_11T Ct=~= ___' AREA 6 LOT SIZH9 AND DENSITY EXCEEDS "VERY LOW" DESIGNATION; CIRCULATION PLAN INCONSISTENT WITH ENGINEERING COMMENTS. FEBRUARY 22, 1990 HOLLER TO LPDG: EN SCREEN CHHCX DRAFT NOT ACCBPTABLB: [NHBD POLICY OUIDELIN69 FROM DECISION MAKERS) MARCH 2, 1990 LPDQ TO THE JOHNSON GROUP: 2/.l!* DRAFT CONSIDERHD SCRBBNCHBCK AND NOT FOR CIRCULATION MARCH ~; 749fi NJ?N$EP.SOH/BP.ATT ATTENDED CONSORTIUM MEETING: DISCUSSION OF 10% REDUCTION 08 LOT SIZES; LJH REQUESTED THAT PLAN9 USING SMALLER LOT 9IZES NOT BB SUBMITTBD TO CITY POR REVIEW UNTIL I99V6 RE90LVBD; LJH REQUESTED MEMO ON UNIT TRAHSFER8 WITHIN 9P; 8WL9 DISTRUHUTED HANDOUT ON COMPARISON CITY/COUNTY STANDARDS; DIIORIO REQUESTED M66TIN0 WITH COUNCIL 9U8 ~yy 5 VX COMMITS66~SBC/CD REQUESTED MEETING ON PROPER USEB~ D28CU99ZON OF CONSORTIUM CONC S WITH cI'1".' T K PROCESSING; LJH STATED THAT THERE IS CITY RESOLVE TO UPHOLD CITY STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMHNT IN THE EN AREA. MARCH 9, 1990 LPDO TO MB NOTICE OF RELOCATION OF 117 UNITS FROM CREST SITE TO UNIVERSITY TRACTS, AND SUH AREAS 2G, 6A, 6C, 6D; AND RELOCATION OF UNITS WITHIN TRACY PROJHCT SUB AREAS 2D,2E, 3G,3H,3I. APRIL 3, 1990 BULLER TO CONSORTIUM: STATUS OF 8N PROJBCT: COMPARISON OP CITY/PLAN STANDARDS; HIR STATUS; REQUEST PO ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR EZR APRIL •, 1990 BRATT ATTENDED CONSORTIUM MEETING; LETTHR OP 4/3/90 CIRCOLATHD; ALL LANDOWNHRS PRESHNT AGREED TO FORMAL PILIN4 IN COUNTY APRIL 6, 3990 DIIORIO TO LJB: !!TTV /~nVTfTI~M~ :~v,. v~~a LnVV6JJlAV APRIL 11, 1990 DIIORIO TO BULLER: DISAGREE THAT "SIGNIPICANT CHANGES MADE IN SPBCIHZC PLAN" COUNTY PROCESSING TO BB EXPLORED; DISAGREE THAT ADDITIONAL EIR ITEMS NEED TO BB REVIEWED. MAY 2, 1990 HMTT ATTENDED CONSORTIUM MEETING: CONSORTIUM RESOLVED TO PROCESS IN COUNTY: IP CITY STANDARDS UPHELD WOULD REDUCE DENSITIES MAY 18, 3990 B[JyL&R TO CONSORTZL'M: PER CITY COUNCIL: DBVBLOPNENT MOST CONFORM TO THE CITY GENERAL PLAN, THH CITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND THAT PROCESSING FOR DEVELOPMENT MUST OCCOR IN THB CITY. MAY 18, 1990 BULLER TO CONSORTIUM: SP 89-01 APPLICATION INCOMPLETE; CITY TO COMPLETE SP AND 8IR MAY 21, 3990 ~ BULLER TO CONSORTIUM: ~ EXF~IT K SP 89-O1 AND RHLATED MAPS; INVITE CONSORTIUM TO MODIFY BNSP OR WITHDRAW APPLICATION ATTACHED: STATUS UPDATE MAY 16, 1990 INCLUDING DETAILED REVIEW OF DIFFHRERCH HETWSEN PLAN AND STANDARDS. MAY 22, 1990 MIKELS/STOUT/PROPERTY OWNERS/ CITY COUNTY STAFF MBETING MAY 24, 1990 DIIORIO TO HULLER APOREMENTIONHD 3 LHTTHRS INCONSISTENT WITH STOUT/MIKELS/PROPERTY OWNER MEHTINO OP MAY 22, 1990 JUNE 6, 1990 BULLER/OOMEZ ATTENDED CONS0RTIUM MBETING; CONSORTIUM RHQUESTBD CITY COOPHRATION WITH COUNTY PROCESSING ~OV EXI~iT K ...,. 10:55 p.m. - Planning Commission recessed. 11:05 p.m. - Planning Commission reconvened. . • • • + P. ENYIRONNENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 - CONSORTIUM Or' ETIWANDA NORTN L NDOWNERS - A request to approve a Specific P an for 5,080 dwelling units, 9.6 acres of commercial, and related school, park, and open space uses on 6,754 acres of land generally iota ted north of 24th Street with portions north of Highland Avenue, south of the National forest Boundary with portions within the National Forest, east of the extension of Milliken Avenue, and west of the Fontana City limit. Miki Bratt, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNi el opened the public hea rf ng. Joe DiIo ri o, Caryn Company, P. 0. Boz 216, South Laguna, stated he was the team leader of the Consor tf um. Me presented a letter outlining his response to the staff report and requested that the staff report be modified to include his comments. He indicated that Caryn owns the 10-acre equestrian center site, the Consortium responded to the City's request for additional EIR funds by expressing surprise that mare study was needed, the Co nsarti um had transferred to processing in the County not because of density conflicts but only because they felt the atmosphere was more Cooperative, and the Consortium had changed the Specific Plan to to nform with City standards ezce pt where they AiA not fn al to An to unuld ha {n thn hoof intoroef c_ of hhu DLw un inl •_ •,.,. staff reports were not planning reports, but rather politf tat reports. Chairman McNi el as xed if he were to ask staff for substantiation of dates, if it could be provided. Ms. 8ratt responded affirmatively. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Lhainnan McNtel stated that if the Resolution passed, it did not mean the City and Consortium were ending discussions, it merely meant the City was cleaning uD paperwork. Motion: Moved by Chi ti ea, seconded by McNtet, to adopt the Resolution rer n~nee nAin A~nial ns Envi:'C 'toi ASScS" • 9 -~~ - nae„ ante OL ari'u Specific Plan G9-vi. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CM ITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried Planning Commission Minutes -19- September 26, 1990 3~i Mr. Buller said staff had a copy of the submittal made to the County and staff could check. Mr. Oiiorio stated that same of the lot sizes are currently below 7,200 square feet, but he was w1lTing to make a commiUne nt that no lots would be under 7,200 square feet. He stated the County Planning Commission Meeting was scheduled for October I1, 1990. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that Chai noon McNi el and Commissioner Tolstoy would be on a Subcommittee. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Chitiea, to continue Enviromnental Assessment and Tentative Tract Maps 14493 through 14498, 14522, and 14523 and Tentative Parcel Map 13128. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LHITI EA, MCNIEL, MELCRER, TOLSTO Y, WEI NBERGER NOES: COMMISS[ONE RS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NDNE -carried P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01 - CONSORTIUM OF ETINANDA NOR H L NDOWN RS Mr. Buller asked if the Commission wished to reverse their previous action on Item P. Commissioner Tolstoy felt it would be a good idea to also continue that Stem. Mr. Buller stated it may be vos si ble to adim,rn the nrtnhoe to toon ot~,,.,t,.,. Commission Meeting to a workshop immediately following the meeting. Motion: Moved by Weinberger, seconded by Melcher, unanimously carried to reconsider their previous action. Chairman Mr-Niel reopened the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Weinberger, to continue Environmental Assessment and Specific Plan 89-01 to October 30, 1990. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCMER, TOLSTOY, WEINRERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried ! • R R R Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Weinberger, unanimously carried, to continue the meeting beyond 11:00 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes -23- September 26, 1990 3G~. DRAFT ..... FOR DISCLSgIO;d 'irl ~,,=;~gES' ONLY PUBLIC HEARfNGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN 69-01 - CONSORTIUM OF ETIWANOA NORTH L N005MERS - request to approve a Specific P an for 5,060 dwe ling units, 9.6 acres of commerci aS, and related school, park, and open space uses on 6,754 acres of land generally located north of 24th Street with portions north of Highland Avenue, south of the National Forest Boundary with portions Within the National Forest, east of the extension of ,u,:a iken P,ven and wes' of the Fon*_ana C+ty limf t. lr,•n•;.._ed fr_... September 26, 1990.) Un IV tHS 1IY ur LALIh UNn;A ANU cAHrn UtVGLVYm[nl - A request ror approval or seven tentative tract maps and one parcel map for 633 dwelling units, a 9.3 acre commercial site, a 4.56 acre park site, and a 7.17 acre school site on approximately 179 acres of land located generally north of Highland Avenue, south of a Southern California Edison utility corridor, west of Hanley Avenue with portions west of the future Day Creek Boulevard, and east of Day f, reek wash. (Continued from September 26, 1990.) Larry Henderson, Pri nci Dal Planner, presented the staff report and additional documentation regarding the items. He stated the City was keeping Lhe door open for future meetings with the applicant. Chai nnan McNi el opened the public hearing. MIII LG I'II LOCI, LGIIV ~IC11 VG']Il~ll VIVVp, 1LJV IIC]L VLII JLI CCL, ..VI VIIO, ]LU LCV they were providing nearly twice the City's standard for park land, with some of that land being utility properties which they included to provide cohesiveness. She said in February 1990 it was their understanding that they would receive detailed comments and two months later they started processing in the County. She said they did not increase density in the February draft of the Eti Wanda North Specific Plan. She said the change in development standards occurred in response to the change in City local street section requirements. She said they moved Lo the County because the landowners unanimously decided they could move forward with a better plan in the County than in the City. Joe Oitorio, Caryn Company, P. 0. Box 9216, South Laguna, stated the current version of the Specific Plan represents 15 percent more units than what the City has annexed out of the original Specific Plan. He said they were interested in keeping the door open. He questioneu the purpose of the Resolution. Hz felt the findings in the Resolution should be changed to reflect that the Resolution was being passed in order to clear the table or because the Consortium was processing in the County. Planning Commission Minutes -2- October 10, 1990 3~ bRAFT Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Chairman McNiel stated the Commission was being asked to hrin9 to a close the processing with the Consortium because the project had ceased to move forward. He Said that the Lity and the Consortium did not seem to 6e moving in the same d;'rec ti on during the workshops. He asked if it would 6e possible for the City to work with the County to jointly formulate a Specific Plan. Ralph Hanson, Deputy Lity Attorney, stated that was up to the discretion of the County. B rod Buller, City Planner, stated that at the latest City Council meeting the Gounc it di rented that a letter be sent to Supervisor Mikels requesting that a workshop be set up with the County Lo discuss Lhe Eti Wanda North Specific Plan that the City is preparing in hopes of developing a cooperative Specific Plan. Chairman McR iel asked if it Was re al istSc to believe the County would cooperate. Mr. Buller responded that management staff had met with Supervisor Mikels and it appeared that the possi bii ity exists. Lommissi oner Mel Cher commented that Mr. DiIorio had said he did not understand why the City would adopt a Resolution of Denial. Chairman McNiel commented that everything is processed in a timely fashion as best as can be processed. He felt that when there is no activity, it is best to conclude the matter. He said that the purpose of the Resolution was essentiai ly to clean the slate, as the project is being processed through the Lounty. Commissioner Melcher Wondered how Mr. DiIorio felt about that explanation, Chairman McNiel reopened 4he public hearing. Mr. DiIorio responded that he felt that kee Di ng the door open and keeping the applications alive seemed to ga hand-in-hand. He Said he felt that the reasons for passing the Resolution should 6e restated, Chairman McNtei again closed the public hearing. He stated that passage of the Resolution would allow the City to move forward with preparation of its own Specific Plan. Mr. Buller stated that it would Seem redundant to keep one in the processing stage when a different plan is being Dre pa re d. Motion: Moved by Chi ti ea, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolution recommending denial of Environmental assessment and Specific Plan 89-01. Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes -3- October 10, 1990 `,(O bR,AFT AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CH IT IEA, MCN IEL, iOLS TOY NOES: COMM ISS ICNE RS: NONE ABSENT: CDMMISSION ERS: NONE -carried ABSTAIN: COMM ISSiONE RS: MELCHER Commissioner Mel cher stated he did not feel sufficiently competent on the issue to vote. Motion: Moved by Chi tiea, seconded by Tol stoy, to adopt the Resolution denying Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Maps 14493 Lhrou gh 14498, 14522, and 14523 and Tentative Parcel Map 13128. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHIT IEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER Commissioner Melcher again stated he did not feel sufficiently competent on the issue to vote. x x x x x ". ^yCC ~t [ II, CTnv }C Mqp yIMO nn zo designation to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units p cre) for 7,94 9 V VV of land located on the southeast corner of Mill' Avenue and Vi nta e D - APN: 225-25i-47. Related file: Te nta Tract 14508. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASS NT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 1450 THE DANES GROOP - A residential subdi vi sio d design review for single family lots on 7.94 acres of land locate the southeas rner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive - APN: 225-251- Re file: Development District Amendment 89-06. Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, anted the s report. Commissioner Tolstoy for clarification on how a General Telephone switching station interface with the ad~oi ni ng lot d if there would UC 0 11011 al VY11~ tal A• Mr. Haye esponded that the switching station currently has a wa on the east south sides and the applicant was proposing block walls alo the si yard portions of the property up to the return walls, with an pen Planning Commisston Minutes -4- October 10, 1990 3~s RESOLUTION N0. 90-128 A RESOLUTION .OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RgNCHO CUClWONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL, NITHOUT PREJUDICE, OF SPECI FIL PLAN 89-01, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF 24TH STREET WITH PORTIONS NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH Of THE NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY WITH PORTIONS N[THIN THE NATi OVAL FOREST, EAST OF THE EXTENSION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND WEST OF THE FONTANA CITY LiMiT. A. Recitals. (i! The Consortium of Etiwa nda North Landowners has filed an application as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Specific Plan is referred to as "the application." (iii On the 26th day of September, and continued to the 10tH day of October 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and concluded said hearings on that date. fiii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 9, Resolution. NON. THEREFORE. it is hereby found, dn~ermi„ve ~~n ,._t„±yg. ti...c Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: " 1. Th.s Commission hereby spec lfically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, Of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. 9ased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on September 26 and October 10, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically ftnds as follows: (a! The property to the north, south, east, and west of the subject site is undeveloped. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission durinq the above-referenreA m~biir has ring. and open thB sPectflc finding; of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a? The Specific Plan is not consistent with the Generai Plan and Oeveiopme nt Code. ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 90-128 SP 89-01 - CONSORTIUM October 10, 1990 Page 2 4. Envi rommental studies have not been completed, therefore, the application is not in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends denial without prejudice of the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1990. PLANNING COMtJ,ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST: [, Brad Buller. Secretary of tM Diann ~,.., r,.~,~..1 a.^. .e tkc C'. t~ t Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly sand regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the Cf ty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; NONE ABSTAIN: CgMISS10NERS: MELCHER ~/ RESOLUTION N0. ( /"~ ~ ~31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING, W[T HOUT PREJUDICE, SPECIFIC PLAN 89-01, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF 2ATH STREET WITH PORTIONS NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY (WITH PORTIONS WITHIN THE NATIONAL FOREST), EAST OF THE E%TE NS ION OF MI LLIKEN AVENUE, ANO WEST OF THE FO NTANA CITY LI M,IT. A. Recitals. (i) The Consortium of Etiwa nd t. North Landowners has filed an application as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Specific Plan is rs ferred to as "the application." (ii) On the 26th day of September, and continued to the 10th day of October 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and concluded said hearings on that date. (iii) On the 1th day of November 19!10, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) Ali legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Ha ncho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all o' the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the Pta nning Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on September 26 and Oc toher 10, 1990, and to the City Council on November 7, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together wi t~~i public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The property to the north, south, east, and west of the .. ,.d~e~ a.w ra una e,e vyea. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: J' ~ Z7 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. SP 89-01 - ET IWANOA NORTH CONSORTIUM November 7, 1990 Page 2 (a) The Specific Plan it not consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. q. Environmental studies have not been completed, therefore, the application is not in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby recommends denial without prejudice of the application. ,_ „- 3~~ n,mv nv+ n , ern rtn nrrn „~n~rn , STAFF REPORT DATE: November 1, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer 9Y: pain A. Rougeau, Traffic Enai neer SUBJECT: Consideration to reduce the speed limit on Rochester Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road. It is recommended that Section 10.20.020 of the Municipal Code be amended to provide fora speed limit of less than 50 MPH on Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road and making findings thereof. BACKGRWND/ANALYSIS Sections 22357 8 22358 of the California Vehicle Code allow cities to set speed limits in accordance with specific engineering surveys in order to rwre precisely establish the "reasonable and prudent" speed required under basic State speed law. This speed then becomes the basis for enforcement, eliminating the extreme discretion which otherwise could wwr. ou~u d au, •c,r, icaa •.. m. + ~c.~a ~. ~, ~+ .~+.. ..y,... ... ...~., .. radar is used for enforcement. A survey as required above has been conducted on Rochester Avenue. The survey involved the detersalnatlon of the prevailing speed of existing traffic by the use of radar, an analysis of the recent accident history and a search for arty conditions not apparent to drivers which would require a reduced speed. The results of th1s survey is summarized in the attached ta61e. A]though after review of these results it was found that the safety record of Rochester Avenue 1s well within expected limits, there are some coadltlons not readily apparent to drivers that could be considered by the Council in reaching a speed limit decision. These are the three intersections with streets serving the adlacent residential area. Because ttR west side of Rochester Avenue is unffnished and undev2lop€d, and the east side has a continuous block wall, the intersections are not easily seen Dy drivers on Rochester. The wall and limited street access greatly increase safety and driver intervlslbility at the intersections 1s unlimited, but such conditions should not be perwltted to imply that no caution at ail Ts needed. The quantitative analysts points to a 45 t~ 7~1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FAIRNONT/VINTAGE/7TH STREET AND VICTORIA PARK LANE OCTOBER 17, 1990 PAGE 2 h~H speed limit; however, the City Council may consider the unusual conditions 6escribed above and adJust the limit to 40 MPH. Any further reduction at this time would not be supported by the quantitative analysis or mltigaiing circumstances. rn4rl I ISrny. A speed limit should be established that would be considered reasonable by most of the drivers on the street and stilt provide for effective enforcement. A speed limit such as this is set at, in most cases, the first 5 MPH increment below the speed at which 85 percent of the drivers are going. If unusual conditions exist, a further reduction from the 85 percent level acconpanied with a higher level of enforcement can be effective. In this case, the Council mdy determine that the foilowing findings Justify a 40 MPH limit: 1. Rochester Avenue is now at less than 1/2 its ultimate width; 2. Intersections along the street are not readily apparent to drivers; and 3. Schooi Dus stops exist along the east side of the street, resulting in groups of children gathering along the curb several tines a day. qe ayll. 4l Yl ly ~Y1xa1 LTRa, ~' se:PAR:Jh cc: Clyde Boyd, Chairman, Public Safety Commission Attachnent ~ ~l = _ ~ € ~ ~ ~o ;..~ 7~-- ORDINANCE N0. `?~~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SECTION 10,20.C20 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE, REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that Lhis City council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. (ti) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets as specified in Part b of this Ordinance. (iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are bvased upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (ti), above. B. Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLONS: Section 1 Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state law maximum speed. It is determined by City Counc reso u on an upon a asis o an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it is declare4 that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated Tn this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 1. Archibald Ave. - Banyan to North end 50 2. Archibald Ave, - 4th St. to Banyan St. 45 3. Arrow Rt. - Baker to Haven 45 4. Baker Ave. - nth St. to Foothill Blvd. 35 5. Banyan SL. from Beryl St. to London Av. 35 6. Banyan St. from west City Limits to Beryl St. 40 1, Base Line Rd. - west City Limits to Carnelian 45 3 73 ORDINANCE OCTOBER 17, 1990 PAGE 2 Declared Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH) 8. Base Line Rd. - Carnelian to Hermosa 40 9. Base Line Rd. - Hermosa to Spruce 45 10. Beryl St. - Banyan to end 45 11. Beryl St. - 800' n/o Lesion to Banyan 40 12. Carnelian St. -Foothill Blvd. to end 45 13. Center Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Church St. 40 14. Church St. -from Archibald Ave. t0 Elm 40 15. 8 th St. - Grove to Haven 45 16. EtTwanda Ave. - Foothill to Summit 45 17. Fairmont Dr. - Milliken Ave. to East end 35 18. Grove Ave. - 8th to Foothill Blvd. 40 19. Haven Ave. - 4th Street to Mil son 45 20. Hellman Ave. - Foothill to Alta Loma Dr. 35 21. Hellman Ave. - 500' n/o Manzanita to Palley View 40 22. Hellman Ave. - 6th to Foothill 45 23. Hermosa Ave. - Base line Road to w115on Av 45 24. Hermosa Ave. - Hilson to Sun Valley Dr. 40 25. Hermosa Ave. - 8th St. to Base Line Rd. 45 26. Highland Ave. - Amethyst to Hermosa 35 27. Highland Ave. -from Hermosa Ave. to 800' west of Haven 45 28. Hiilside Rd. - ranch Gate to Amethyst St. 35 zv. ri~ll;id~"C ueYe^ fn Canistel Ave. 35 30. Lemon Ave. - Archibald Ave. to Haven 4C 31. Lemon Ave. - Jasper St. to Beryl St. 35 32. 9th St. - Baker Ave. to Archibald Ave. 40 33. Red HT11 Country Club Dr. -Foothill to Alta Cuesta 35 34. Rochester Ave. - Foothill Blvd. to Base Line Road 40 or 45 35. San Bernardino Rd. - from Vineyard Ave. to Archibald Ave. 35 36. Sapphire St. - Banyan to end 45 37. Sapphire St. - 19th W Lemon 40 38. 7th St. -Hellman to Rrchlbald Ave. 45 39. Spruce Ave. - Elm Ave. fA Base Line Rd. 40 40. Terra Vista Parkway -Church to Belplne 40 4i. Victoria SL -Archibald Ave. to Ramona 35 42. Victoria St. - Etiwanda Ave. to Rt. 15 40 43. Victoria St. - Haven Ave. to Mendocino 40 44. Victoria Park Ln. -Fairmont Mey Lo Base Ltne Rd. 35 ~~ ORDINANCE OCTOBER i7, 1990 PAOE 3 Prima Facie Name of Street or Portion Affected 45. Victoria Windrows Loop (north b south) 46. Vineyard Ave. - Church to Base Line Rd. 47. Vineyard Ave, - 8th St. to Foothill Blvd. 46. Yintaye Or. -Milliken Ave. to East end 49. Whittram Ave. - Etiwanda to east City Limits 50. W11son - Amethyst Ave. Haven Ave. 51. Wilson - Haven Ave. to 200' east of Canistel Ave. Declared Speed Limit (MPH) 35 40 45 35 40 45 40 (Ord. 169 Section I (Dart), 1982: Ord. 39 Section 5.1, 1978). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (il Both sixty-five (651 miles per hour and fifty-five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe; (i1) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which are msot appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (1v) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2 The City Cierk shall certify to the passage of th15 Ordinance and shalt cause the same to be published as required by law. Section 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cierk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City OT un arlo, t,ai arm a, ded circulated in the City of Ra^,cho CUCa!~nga; California. 3 ~S ---- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 T0: CTty Council and City Manager FROM: Shi ntu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Engineer J.. LY- SUBJECT: Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire Public Right-of-way for the Signal and Intersection Improvements for Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard at the property located at 1L929 Foothill Boulevard (APN 229-021-17) for the installation of traffic signals and Tmprovements to the intersection at said property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemnation of right-of-way for the installation of a traffic signal and intersection improvements for the intersection of Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard at thie property located at 11929 Foothill Boulevard (APN 229-021-17) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUNDlANALYSIS This is an Eminent Domain action to acquire right-of-way for the Signal and Intersection Improvements for Rochester Avenue at Foothill BnulevarA. The project will include installation of a traffic signal, widening of Rochester Avenue and its intersection with Foothill Boulevard and a storm drain line extension. The property owners of the parcel in question were mailed a written offer of compensation on September 17, 1990, for the necessary right-of-way and a copy of the appraisal prepared by an independent appraiser. Additionally a letter informing the owners of the forthcoming condemnation proceedings has been mailed by first class mail on October li, 1990. Public safety is a major concern lending to the urgent nature of this actfon. Although negotiations for right-of-way dedication continue, it is felt necessary at this time to enact a R~:solutlon of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such right-of-way for the proposed traffic signal !nstallaticn, street wtdenino. storm drain extension and intareortinn Improvements for Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard. Respectfuflly submitted, y SB:JLM:Iy Attachment 3 '7>0 RESOLUTION N0. ~~~ ~i ~~., A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUDLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining *.e the installation of traffi•= signals and improvement of Rochester Aaenue at Foothill Boulevard intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "project"). Based upon such anatysi s, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible plan for the installation of traffic signals, street widening, storm drain extension and improvement of the intersection will require the acquisition of a portion of that Certain real property commonly known by the street address of 11929 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, California, (APN 229-021-17), and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit "A". (ii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 40404(a), a City may acquire private property by condemnation when it is necessary for establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 7267.2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by an independent appraisal valuation; (iv) On November 7, 1990, this Council held a duly noticed hearing Nu~ii ~lii> V"I II VI IIIO UVUC VI l.l,ll r1 Ul.l'UUfY ~, Jt'I. I.I UII 1245235, randy saidc hearing was concluded prior Lo the adoption of this Resolution; and, B. Re501ut1 on NOY, THERff01lE, it Ts hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Councii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Park A, of this Reso uT-tT-on: - SECTION 2: That portion of the property which is required for right-of-way ~t~e traffic signal installation, street widening, storm drain extension and intersection improvement purposes referenced herein is situated in the Ci'•• ^f R .~ ~ arltn'v CuWliri~ny'a, Cuunty Gf San Bernardiliu, State of California, and 1s more specif1ca11y outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council ur ng a above-referenced public hearing, including written staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 3 7~ RESOLUTION N0. NOVEMBER 7, 1990 PAGE 2 b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined in this Resolution is necessary for the proposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owner of said real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267,2. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire t e proper y described in Section 2, above, by proceedings in Eminent domain. The City Attorney Ts ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, to the name of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination to accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney 1s authorized and instructed to make application to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein descrl bed. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. rruocu ana Auuriw cros coy or I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution as Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1990, and was finally passed at a regular mee ng of the y ounc o e~C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1990, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS; ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: rSe~a~~ s City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 7~ E%HIBIT A-1 ~~ .. ~_ J.F. David eon Associates, Inc. ~~ ENGINEERING PUNNING SURVEYING ARCHITECTURE LANOBCRPF AAGHITE CTURE December 22, 1909 W.O. 8910568 Revised July 25, 1990 RIGN1 OF HAY DEDICATION FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE Ci T't OP RAfiCHG CUCAMONGA PROPERTY OF JOAN V. AGGAZZOTTI TRUSTEE That portico o£ Lot 112 and Orange Avenue (vacated) of Map of Rochester as shown by map on file in Book 9 of Mapa, et page 20 thereof, Recozda of San Bernardino County, Callfoznia, described as follows: aeginning at the intersection of the Easterly line of Rochester Avenue 160.00 feet wide) as shown on Parcel Map No. 4485, by map on file in Book 40 of Parcel Haps, et pages 65 and 66 thereof, Recozda of San Besnsxdino County, California, also being the Me atezly line of Orange Avenue (vacated) by Resolution recorded December 38, 1936 in Book 1177, page 320, Official Recozda of San eeznazdf.no County, California with the Southerly line of roornut eouuevare as conveyeu ca rile scare ci i.eiiicznie iuy uenu zwccruvu April 4, 1929 in Book 482, page 334, Official Records of San Bernardino County, Californin; Thence 5.00°24'24"N. along said Easterly line of Rochester Avenue, also being said Westerly line of Orange Avenue (vacated), a distance of 134.81 feet to the Southwest corner of that Certain parcel of land ea Conveyed Co Joan V. Agqazzotti, Trustee by deed recorded December 30, 1987, es Instrument No. 154037, Oftieial Recozda of San Bernardino County, California; Thence 5.89°35.36^E. along the Southerly line of acid parcel conveyed to Joan V. Agqazzotti, Truatea, a distance of 46.00 feet to a line parallel with and 76.00 Ceet Easterly, measured at right angles from tho center line of said Rochester Avenue (60.00 feet wide); Thence N.00°24'24^E. along avid parallel line, a dial sore of 101.10 feat; lF9^Lemp~51~!el 5unelW 10910 5M1 ee~~o+a. a+ue - ~^S~e^.'D~ne Y?aP JeBaso^B..ne 115 00 Bo•:?? Cono^ C>P.?:a Pa~T r1rb+ Cc ffi:EO PO Bo. 3~0 Rn r~Tme Ga n,;;r, Lu~FCE 10Pi FO Bo. ': f": tenwcWa CA P2??0 -~4BF OBVJ its )~: PZ<.p<F? Ra'~^f'nu^CC O+; Ey ,".a 6'6~S]10 ice ;I..f 36 E:~ca .f ~s?=E EFm fax )Ia 699IPP' .aa 6'o v9 g:o R-O-N DEDICATION/JOHN V. AGGAZEOTTI TRVST N.O. 991056a December 22, 1909/Revised Su1y 25, 1990 Pages 2 EXHIBIT A-2 Thence Northerly and EaaCCrly on a curve concave Southeasterly hav Sng a radius of 24.00 feet, through an angle of H9°95.36^, an arc length of 37.60 feet to a line parallel' with and 60.00 feet Southerly, meaaurad at right angles from the centerline of acid Poothill Boulevard, also being the Northerly line of said Lot 112; Thence 5.09°50'00"E. along said par.+l lel line, a distance of SS.00 feel; Thence N.00°30r 00"E., a distance of 70.00 feet to said Southerly line of acid Foothill Houleva rd; Thence N.89°50'00"N. along acid Southerly line, a distance of 124.86 feet to the point of beginning. The above described parcel of land contains 7,116 square feet, more or less; LO/XAF/lb LEG:D33 X43 HOMED A. ~~~CRIFTION FXEFMED UNOER TXE 6UPERVISIDN OF: i ~, f, / i fYmvnnu G/• iXN2 n `r. ~..-S. o-tz7,7 S~^/ i Xomer A. Founteln0 Date N0. 33~~ vp P. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~ C~ BYO CO ~ HPR/L a~/929~/N BQ9K~ P.9GE' ._?,6. 0. R. 5. B. ClJ. ~ Cfl. FDOTN~L L ~ NYY L/NE' OF COT /7 V ~ ~ ~-r l i 1 n raj v ~~'r~- -r la ,, / i >/'/^`~ ~- , ?~ vQ ~~ ag Q V ~• ac vn. NB9'SO'o_O t 0 ~ h._...~. L/hL~ OF //z .70 ~ I~R•24. LYJ~ D - B 9'a5',9G' -4' ~ ~L•37.00' 7G -r l l ~~. .~~ 60 ~ M B. ~/c'd S.6C.b• -r 111 OEC. /8, ~j3e 320, O. R, Cc., Co. 60 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7N/S PC AI /S SPLFU' AA' A/O /N LOfJT/AC TNF IMNLfC /5/ OESCF/Bf0 /N TNf SMff! ~ OF / /off e/F ATTIpfD OOCVMfNT /T /5 NOT A PINT OF TN£ WN/TTEN QESCR/pTgW TIENfM'. l S[ALF'/"r /PD• ~'PA~M' er (Q OITF ? /2S/~ s~e~ecT ~Pxyr cK'h~r a°o/cnnoN-Fn['NESre.P /+~tE -- CITY OF RANCHO CGCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Engineer ",',~' 4J&IECT: Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action io acquire Public Right-of-way for the Signal and Intersection Improvements for Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard at the property located at 8171 Rochester Avenue and 11941 Foothill Boulevard (APN 229-021-31, 32, respectively) for the installation of traffic signals and improvements to the intersection at said property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemnation of right-of-way for the installation of a traffic signal and intersection Improvements for the intersection of Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard at the property located at 8171 Rochester Avenue and 11941 Foothill Boulevard (APN 229-021-31,32, respectively) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS T6i~ io a~~ uui neni utmwin acn on to acquire rt gn t-of-way for the Signal and Intersection Improvements for Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard. The pro]ect will include installation of a traffic signal, widening of Rochester Avenue and its intersection with Foothill Boulevard and a storm drain line extension. The property owners of the parcels in question were mailed a written offer of compensation on September 17, 1990, for the necessary right-of-way and a copy of the appraisal prepared by an Independent appraiser. Additionally a letter informing the owners of the forthcoming condemnation proceedings has been malted by first class mail on October 17, 1990. Public safety is a maJor concern lending to the urgent nature of this action. Although negotiations for right-of-way dedication continue, 1t is felt necessary at Lhis time to enact a gesolution of Necessity to proceed with cor~demr~ation of such right-of-way for the proposed traffic signal installation, street wldenln9, storm drain extension and Intersection Improvements for Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard. Respectfully submitted, ~m~ Y!'ao.r SB:JLM:iy Attachment ~ ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~v ~ X33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE C I'fY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining to the installation of traffic signal<_ and improvement of Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "protect"). Based upon such analysis, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible plan for the installation of traffic signals, street widening, storm drain extension and improvement of the intersection will require the acquisition of a portion of that certain real property commonly known by the street address of 8171 Rochester Avenue and 11941 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, California, (APN 229-021-31, 32 respectively) and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit "A". (ii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 40404(a ), a City may acquire private property by condemnation when Tt is necessary for establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 7267,2, prior to adopting this Resolution, the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established by an independent appraisal valuation; (ivl On November 7, 1990, this Council held a duly noticed hearing 1245.235, and said hearing was ~ concluded eprior ctoi ~theracdoption~ of cthis Resolution; and, R. Resolution NOM, THEREFORE, it fs hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTTOM 1: In all respects as set forth Tn the Recitals, Part A, of this Reso ul--ffon:- SECTIOM 2: That portion of the property which 1s required for right-of-way or traffic signal installation, street widening, storm drain extension and intersection improvement purposes referenced herein is situated sn the r:ry ni Rancho Cucarn;,nya, county of Jan Bernardino, State of California, and is more speci~TCa11y outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council ur ng a above-referenced public hearing, including written staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed protect; RESOLUTION N0. NOVEMBER 7, 1990 PAGE 2 b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; c. The property defined in this Resolution is necessary far the prcposed project; and, d. An offer of fair market value has been made to the owner of sata real property pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire t e proper y described in Section 2, above, by proceedings in Eminent Domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, in the name of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, against alt owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney is authorized and instructed to make application to said Court for an Order ftKing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and far an Drder permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , yor I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution as introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1990, and was finally passed at a regular mewing of the y ounc o e City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1990, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NDES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEM8ER5: ATTEST: ra ams, y er City of Rancho Cucamonga ~~~/ EXH181T A-1 ~:~..~ ,~.` .~, J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. ~~ ~~ ~~ ENGINEERING PLPNNING SURVFYING ARCHREGTURE LAN DSCPPE ARCH,iEC iURE becembec 22, 1989 W,O. 8810568 Revised July 25, 1990 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION ROCHESTER AVENUE CI?V OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPERTY OF G:10-CHAD LIRO, ET AL Thai portion of Orange Avenue )vacated) o£ Hap o£ Rochestec as shown by map on file in Book 9 of MaPS, at page 20 thereof, Records of San Bocnacdino County, Calif ocnia, described as follows: Cormuencing at Che ante mection of thfl Easterly line of Rochestec Avenue 160.00 feet wide) as shown on Parcel Map No, 4485, by map on file in Book 40 of Parcel Maps, at pages 65 and 65 thereof, Recocds of Ban aernardino County, California, also being the Westerly line of Orange Avonue vacated by P.esolut ion recorded December 18, 1936 in Book 1177, page 320, Official Records of Sen Becnacdino County, C+liLocni+ with Lhe Southerly sine of Foothill Bouiave..: :.o c.. ••wywd to the 8Late of California by deed recorded Apzil 9, 1929 in Book 482, page 334, official Records of 9au o<.:.cid'_^~ County, California; Thence 5.00°24'24"W. along said Easterly line of Rochester Avenue, also being ea id westecly line of Orange Avenue (vacated), a distance of 134.81 feet to the Southwmt Garner of that certain pastel of land as conveyed to Joan V. Aggazrott i, Trustee by deed retarded December 30r 1987 as Instrument No. 454037, Official Reeorda of San Becnacdino County, California, said corner bning the point of beginning of the parcel o£ land to be described; Thence continuing S.C"v°024'29°W. a;ang said Easterly line of Rochester Avenue, also being said Nestecly line of Orange Avenue (vacated!, e distance of 475.00 teeL to the Southwest cornet of that certain parcel of land as Conveyed to Gwo-Chau Liaor et al by deed recorded June 27, 1984 as Instrument No. 231550, Official Recocds of San Becnacdino County, calilo sofa; J490 lemCn CI'Pel 6ln,P 1p9 [0 @o• ~9J An~e~S~tf! Ca °~ 5,1? I i,n 606 9F-~ GAt'v eYC•aae; e:~..f. ou -~. t; t icci ~.. ~, ''. o r:r-~~em ., a~, _. r . d ~ i_ R-O-w [EDICATION /GWO-CHAU LIAO, ET AL w.0. 8830568 Decemher 7,2, 1909/Revised July 29, 1990 Page 2 EXHIBIT A-2 Thence 5.89°35'36^E. along the Southerly line of said parcel conveyed to Gwo-Ch au Liao, et al, a distance of 20.00 feet to a line parallel with and 50,00 feet Easterly, measuretl at right angles from the center of said Roc neater Avenue (60,00 feet widel; whence N.00°24'24"E. alone said pazailel line, a distance of 67,72 feet; Tnence Nortnerly on a curve concave Easterly having a radius of 3050.00 feet, through an angle of OS°01'49", an arc length of 92.16 feet; Thence N.OS°26'08"E., a distance of 200.00 feet; Thence Northerly on a curve concave westerly having a radius of 1150.00 feet, through an angle of OS°03'49^, an arc length of 100.93 feet to a line parallel with and 76.00 feet Easterly, measured at right angles from the centerline of said Rochester Avenue; Thence N.00°24'24"E. along said parallel line, a distance of 15.21 feet to the Southazly line of said pascal conveyed to Joan V. Aggazzott 1, Trustee; Thence N.89°35'36^w. along said Southerly line, a distance of 46.00 fn.r rn the ooint of beeinnine. The above described parcel of land contains 15,043 square feet, more or less; LO/HAF/lb LEG:D64 4e 'NON, BL~t ~ FOUNIARiE y Fap. 61Lf! T\[~ ~u. 33vi ~~, \~ ~ ~~L&/ DESCRIPTION PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: r ~~ / /Qo Homer A. Fountaine DaU J. F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES, ZNC. exnieir FdOTH/L L ~ ~- m NYY C/NE OF ~' ~ / <OT /7 / a] v~ F~ I pf ~7 1 l ~$ ~~il ~~ P Jr Q i W /~~ Eli'"'/ '+. ~ fx l~~~ -r J /~:'= ny~~)~ N dyu ti/~/~ ~;: l p~ a~ / '~ /1 l~l~ ~~~ N•j~l __ _~_~ BL I/O. ~ _, NB~'SO'oo"w~__ U) `~ COi'V ~ ~ OF :19'24 E. ~ 2/' ~ LJ7 11 •/Gb.93' r~J r rJ ~:~-r~ f~ M.6. 9/2EJ S.QCb. gCgTFO HY 'ESOLUTiON REC OEC /B,/93G V 6O0K //77, PfriC 32O, O. R. ~-r JJJ `• /050.00' '32. /!" ~ 560 3s'aG E' GO' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~N/S KA//S SIX. fCY AN //O /N (OC.aT/AG TNf /MAYIC /Sl OfSCA/BEO /N THE SMEEI / OF / ~7T~dE0 DOCUMENT iT /S NOT A PIgT OF THE WgITTEN QESCR/PTpN THEREw, / ~ BrF ~:~[f • I % /DO• p4~1ny BT (~ OAff 1 /~/9p St/BJECt ~P.ff/7' dr IWiY 4~OMg770N• ht~CHE57•ER q1'G", CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 ~J' T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer BY: John L. Martin, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing of protests regarding Eminent Domain action to acquire Public Right-of-wdY fer the Signal and Intersection Improvements for Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard at the property located at 11871 Foothill Boulevard (APN 229-011-10) for the installation of traffic signals and improvements to the intersection at said property. RECOMIERDATIOR: Staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolution of Necessity - directing staff to proceed with condemnation of right-of-way for the installation of a traffic signal and intersection improvements for the intersection of Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard at the Droperty located at 11871 Foothill Boulevard (APN 229-011-10) in the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This 1s an Eminent Domain action Lo acquire right-of-way for Lhe Signal and Tn}o rcnr H nn Tmnrnvomm}r fn. nnn i,ne~n. 6.,n n~~n .• e,.,,~,.at o.~n .~...a r,.- project will include installation of a traffic signal, widening of -Rochester Avenue and its intersection with Foothill Boulevard and a storm drain line extension. The property owners of the parcel in question were mailed a written offer of compensation on September 17, 1990, for the necessary right-of-way and a copy of the appraisal prepared by an independent appraiser. Additionally a letter informing the owners of the forthcoming condemnation proceedings has been mailed by first class mail on October 17, 1990. Public safety is a major concern lending to the urgent nature of this action. Although negotiations for right-of-way dedication continue, it is felt necessary at this time to enact a Resolution of Necessity to proceed with condemnation of such right-of-way for the proposed traffic signal 1Aitb i'. aP.f nn c}root wirlaning er_.~ dra i.^. ^°Lensi 3n and interSeC ti Cn Improvc~ments~for Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard. Respectfully submitted, .3~'nc~ SB:JLM:Iy Attachment C RESOLUTION N0. ~ Q ~ ~' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARING THE PUBLIC NEED AND NECESSITY TO CONDEMN A PORTION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study pertaining to the installation of traffic signals and improvement of Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard intersection in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as the "project"1. Based upon such analysis, it has been determined that the most reasonable and feasible plan for the installation of traffic signals, street widening, storm drain extension and improvement of the intersection will require the acquisition of a portion of that certain real property commonly known by the street address of 11871 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, California, (APN 229-011-1C) and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit "A". (11) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 40404(a), a City may acquire private property by condemnation when it is necessary for establishing, laying out, extending and widening streets; (iii) Pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 72ti1,2, prior to adopting this Resoiution, the City has made an offer to the owner of record to acquire the property for the full amount of fair market value as established 6y an independent appraisal valuation; (iv) On November 7, 1990, this Council held a duly noticed hearing pursuant to the terms of California Code of Civil Procedures, Section 1245.235, and said hearing was concluded prtor to the adoption of this Resolution; and, Resolution NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Re sou on. SECTION 2: That portion of the property which is reyutred for -fight-^f-way~i;n traffi^ °•gnyl ins+allatin~ street. wTd?Wino, storm drain extension and intersection improvement purposes referenced herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is more specifica'ily outlined in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTEOM 3: Based upon the substantial evidence Dresented to this Council ur nd`T g-ffie above-referenced public hearing, including written staff reports, the City Council specifically finds as follows: project; a. The public interest and necessity require the proposed 3~9 RESOLUTION N0. NOVEMBER 7, 1990 PAGE 2 b. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private i n,l ury; c. The property defined 1n this Resolution is necessary for the proposed pros ect; and, d. An offer of fair market value has Deen made to the owner of said real property pur<_vant to the terms of California Government Code Section 7267.2. SECTION 4: The City Council hereby declares its intention to acquire t e p~ described in Section 2, above, by proceedings in Eminent Domain. The City Attorney is ordered and directed to bring an action in the Superior Court of the State of California far the County of San Bernardino, in the name of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, against all owners and claimants of the property described herein for the purpose of condemning for street improvement purposes, and to do all things necessary to prosecute said action to its final determination in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. The City Attorney 1s authorized and instructed to make application to said Court for an Order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as may be directed by said Court and for an Order permitting the City to take possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ... ..o r MOncv mw nov~iw tug ...; or I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution as Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held an the day of 1990, and was finally passed at a regular meeffng of the y ou'Ci~L nc~of-trl-e City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1990, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: ra ams, y er City of Rancho Cucamonga 3y~ E%HI BIT A-1 ~~ ~ J.F. Davidson Associates, Ina. A- ~ ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING ARCRITECTURE LANOSLAPE ARCHnLC1URE December 22, 1989 W,O. 8930568 RIGNT OF FAY DEDICATION FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PROPERTY OF JACK H. MAEI AND JENNIE L. MAST That Fortion of Lot 17 of Map of Rochester as shown by map on file in Book 9 of Mapsr at page 20 thereof, Records of San eernaxdino County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Easterly line of said Loi 17, Deinq the Westerly line of Rochester Avenue formezly Orange Avenue with a line pa zallel with and 50,00 feet southerly, measured at right angles from the Northerly line of said Lot 17 as shown on acid Map of Rochester also being Che ante rsectian of the Nestezly line of Rochester Avenue 160.00 feet wide) with the Southerly line of Foothill Boulevard as shown on parcel Map No. 4485 by map on file in Book 40 of maps, at pages 65 and 66 thezeof, Records of San Bernazdino County, California; Thence N.69°50.04 ^W., along acid parallel line, also being Bald Southerly line of Foothill Boulevard, a distance of 24.00 feet: Thence 5.00°09.56"W., a distance of 10.00 feet to a line pazallel with and 60,00 feet southerly, nleaaured at right angles from the centerline of said Fooihill Boulevard, also being said Northezly line of Lot 17; Thence S.B9°50'04^E. along acid parallel line, a diaiance of 10.66 feet; Thence Southeasterly on a curve concave Southerly having a radius of 24.00 feat, through an angle of 46°49'56^, an arc length of 20.45 feat to Che eaats rly ant cf acid Lci 17, also Deinq said Westerly line of Rochester Avenue; Thence N.00°24'24"E. along said Easterly line of Lot 17, also Deing said Westerly line of Rochester Avenue, a distance of 16.20 feet to the point of beginning, 3880 LP mnn F^P!I $y~l!?00 „J?'~ D $ Id; YP N^ 4v P,uf Ji $~P'~' D'1P '~?~°. JP11 P110n $u~l! 115 PO Bn. ao3 Con^n C. rJJJ Palm DPFf, C : 43'f] v0 eo. JJO Rn lie ql Ua:::] C4.F'S "~F" _ PD 9y ': GI TP;^PC Nd Ln Qi?fln ~',m EPF OB:a i>~1'J a15 P+9? vai"Jeer Ca o_;=: J~a'E"6.9-10 E xe bJ FFF i.'.: ~F'O')ai'3d P1 Ec, ;;a ynP 1RFI ice F:P 3a y,•;y A-O-W DEDICATION/JACH ~ JENNIE HASI N.O. 89L056E PAGE 2 EXH1917 A-2 The above delcrlbed parcel of land contalne 335 square teet~ more or lees LO/HAF/lb LEG:DBO ~. ~/ DEECRIPTION PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: 4 IIUMER A. " ~ `~1 ~~ t- FOUNTAINE $ Homer A. Fountains nets 1 bg 630,81 1 J. F. DAVIOSON ASSOCIATES INC. E[ No. 3307 elf ~~>, ~ E%H!BIT A-3 I /` ~' FGYITH/GL .u69'so'o4,w - + NLy GiNE OF GOT i7 C5 B) ~ i ,o~- ~ SC~ Je/ ciT i_ ~ ~5 ZA i^ ~j R' 2 a G ~;v ' ~. ~ ~~ V 1/~C~ ~ Jr .r nY \II^I ~I.V ~ 1 II~~' i (p5 ,,:Ire ,~ r~l~,.~ j.~ u- v. ~~~~il ; ~ ~' 17 Jr Qv' ~ F~ oe ~~I ... 30 ~' W ! 3G~ I, ~~ BLVO. N N n ti~~ e Q .~C~G ~~~oU yy~ ~~~` o~~'e m~~~ r LJ7 J J f~~r~--Jr :~-!'~r~ M B 9/20 S Co, o~ .~~ ~;~ __. V 30' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INiS P(,O /S SOC EL f AN A/O /N COUP/AG TrE /MNC£C /S/ OESCF~BED /N JNE I SNEE f / 0= l ~[,.~B (p~ ~ffap^~EO A-7C~UME~NIT /7 /5 NOf APd pf O~ THE wNR7EN LYSCA/PIgN T/fAF/N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRDM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: INLAND HMPIRB POBTMARE Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution in support of their effort to help market our regions identity. BackorouaQ The City has received a request for the Inland Empire Economic Council to adept the attached resolution supporting ar. Inland Empire postmark. This postmark would be used for all mail processed at the San Bernardino General Mail Facility. Respectfully submitted, Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager DAS/tlr DAB:611 Attachment 39~ RESOLUTION N0. 90- ~ ~~ A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO INSTITUTE THE INLAND EMPIRE POSTMARK WH ERE.AS, the State of California has identified the Inland Empire as one of the Regions of the "Californias": and WHEREAS, the Inland Empire is defined as the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, the eastern portion of Los Angeles County, and the 47 incorporated cities therein; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the residents of the Inland Empire to strengthen the sense of the region and community; and WHEREAS, there would be substantial benefit to the businesses and residents in the Inland Empire to enhance its national and international name recognition; and WHEREAS, the Inland Empire Economic Council values its identf ty as a bu sS mess location in the Inland Empire. NON, THEREFORE, tie City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve and Che inland Empire Economic Council supports an "Inland Empire" postmark on all mail processed at the San Bernardino General Mail Facility; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Inland Empire Economic Council supports analysts of the service area of the San Bernardino General Maii Facility such that all Inland Empire mail would be processed at that location. ~ 9s -- CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT _ ;. DATE: November 7, 1990 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner S UBJELT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-038 - CITY OF RANC HD CUCAMONGA - A request to adopt a Resolution of Intent for various changes in the Land Use, Ci rcuiation, and Public Facilities elements of the General Plan to provide consistency between the Etiwa nda North Specific Plan and the General Plan, as well a5 changes in other elements as may be needed to provide internal consistency within the General Plan, for the area generally located within the Etiwa nda North Specific Plan, portions north of Highland Avenue, south of the National Forest Boundary !with portions within the National Forest?, east of the ex to nsion of Milliken Avenue, and west of the Fontana City limit. RECOMMEND AT[ON: Staff recomne nds approval of the attached Resolution of Intent to Amend the Land Use, Circulation, and Pu 61 is Facilities elements of the General Plan to provide consistency between the Eti wa nda North Specific Pian and the General Plan. !See Exhibit "1", Vicinity Map.? BACKGROUND/ANALYS IS• Changes in the Land Use, Circulation, and Public Facilities elements must be made to provide consistency between the General Plan and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Other changes may be needed to provide internal consistency among the elements of the General Plan. A preliminary map of Lhe proposed tha rages is attached as Exhibit "2." It 'S 2x-vei to u' the i. ihn afn rn monttinnoa ~ ..... :...:....... . _ _..._..-.-.._.. ,.,~„~~~,~„~~ ~~~ap will be adjusted following public review and comment on the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. In addition, adjustments may be necessary for one or more of the following reasons: t Consultation with the County and adoption of a joint County/City Specific Plan; 39~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 90-036 - CITY OF RANCHO CUC AMONGA November 7, !990 Page 2 * Consul to ti en with the County of San Bernardino Flood Control Department in their role as major property owner in the subject area ; * Requests from property owners in the subject area. ~h° n shn I.^a n^ n ^ °° '^ ,.,c .,e-~ent. App rx:ma taly 2S acres of land wuu id be changed from-Flood Control to Residential Use west of the Day Creek levee. Approximately 179 acres of land would be changed from open space to residential use in the University project area. Other land use changes are also being studied. An unspecified amount of acreage would he changed from residential use to open space for the purpose of identifying existing utility corridors and seismic easements. Also, an unspecified amount of acreage would be changed from residential use to flood control where fl oodways exist but are currently undefined. In addition, floating designations to meet identified school and park requirements will be added. Cha na es in the Ci rtu la Lion Element. The existing Circu latf on Element of the General Plan only infers circulation for the subject area. A definitive Circulation Element is proposed for Lhe subject area and will be added to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. C ha noes in the Public Facilities Element. Except for the Cucamonga County Water District's Royer-Ni shett Water Treatment Plant, no public facilities are indicated for the subject area. School and park sites ..... uc a~u e,i. Additional Cha noes. Additional changes may be needed in the text of the General Plan to provide internal consi stenty. CONCLUSION: Staff recomne nds approval of the attached Resolution of Ir.te nt Lo Amend the Land Use, Circulation, and Public Facilities elements of the General Plan, as well a5 other text changes which may be needed to achieve internal consistency within the General Plan. Respe y subm' i ~\\ __ ~~ Braes er City anner BB:MB/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "I" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "2" - Preliminary Land Use Map Exhibit "3" - Existing General Plan Land Use Map 39~ LEGEND ~nuuUi I SPECD7C PLAN 90-01 ETIWANDA NORTH ~~~~ Specific Plan 90-01 __~ INCLUDES AREAS 2-6 d A•E 2 UMVERSITY OFCALffORN1A/CARYN 3 LANDMARK DEVLPMi'. CO. ~ CHENO SAN SEVAWE CeiANG 6 CNENO FDS1SfDE COtr1PLETED ANNEXATIONS: A.CARYN, tt. WATT iNI.AND, C.AF4IANSON, D. WATT INLAND EMPIXE, d E. BLACXAtANMOhffSTEADI EXISTIIJG CITY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE REMQVGTON ~^~ CI1Y OF ,~ ~~' ITEM: GPA 90-038 ~_ UCAMONGA TITLE: VICINITY MAP ~ PLANNi H ION ~~ ~ 39~ EX.H®IT; "1" SCALE: NONE -~-i. 11 ' 1 9e f 1 ~ ~ .~ 110 ~ a... '~'~ ~ ~ 03 S. i ~4otr'iT-~. u ~ .~~.1 ~4fv• ~ _ .~_ ,_~ Ol+ ~ 1 os ~___ ... 1` 08 \... RCN~r ~ _ VL ~ :. N VL _ \ ~ __ ~•' ~ F0 110 y VL b L ~~) 1Q81 ~l''i 1_, ,. ' :.: FGf~I. IPI 'h Mt''~ vL ~ ~~:r Fc __ L ~ ;r' ,NC l/~ z 1, L ~ L T:, ~~,~~~ N ~`LI ' fT-~-%~ A ' L406VP. tI1FJnpVAl1TINN Nt• ; ~' L ... ~i ' ~sSI L ...N ,.~...~ soesrm L^.QIh Q ~ 5~ ~ mAwl JOAmI ne '~'0 , .. - L vL tgYy, wlAQ Y WJ ]wl , ~ . ~~ ~ ~~ ®rlaNla wuq m5 un , , ,,, ~ ~ ~~ATatn vww uJ b ~~~ l L_ tlmrtuL y L _ j ~ MA.~SpWJI^~1'A-ISAQ WA: ,,, ~,~~ e tm ~mamausmartLU.enAn IW%IOW1UpLStIJAC) IHJ yp i 4 I lPJ. 511B.TOfAL ISfS.I SlA VptE{,•.FI~LO,VARYACYIMVT4 M.Im ON AVAMIIB MAy ' uC NpG1®OIN000WM211LlAL y5 .. L MIS Al198{IgAifgGyI111LNi MJ1{S}GS®IIOIMlIi OrvN er.R 1SI19ry,CT ip ADCRIpYAL AN.V,YSF.i, p.Qyppp SIL~I ANUnaq •. NOGIgU11GW rA11[KQYLY 6TfWAT®L'NRS: os artN SrAa ISl®rflatrel L'MABId IBOSM®IMCS ACCAlTN1Q-' MiJ l 1005. MGI ~ AU. (S ACA YIrs'n1A - RJ PC PIDJOmNfIOI +y1 .. •11P... ~•~IIN'J 555VIOlOAM CC R VlMy mlllmq mPIR66 1bJ ~~ •• Rn D FAULT LN9 LYSYJI (pC l6i1 FU PAVLTl~M (pC lyJ) ~~ lCN IIPJgII®m113FJYATION .. ISPIRffry6NyiiAT R6PJVATWN AAPAI fpClq .. OIQI SrA~SUB.iOfAL ytli If) A0pS8Di<51pq. fnOATgO CEyN1NAlNM AA m RormFn NF,Alwolxom rUk •• IPILIATW(I fLPbv.nm w wtnTVmreli>m +i .. smSmoxAL MATPl111FA1y@(S rLSNF. lJ5GV00. tICJ ba .. ruwcrALVnnJSUSimu lo.t .. TOTAL 1~1t ~ ITEM: CPA 90.036 CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TI•CLE: ~~NO use MAP N PLANNING DMSiON ~~~ EXHIBIT: " 2" SCALE: NONE 7 NOV 90 RESOLUTION NO, l1J ~ ~ 3 }~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC HG CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF lNTE NT TO PREPARE MIE NOME NTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN INCLUDING VARIOUS CHANGES IN THE LAND USE, CIRCULATION, AND PUBLIC FRCILITIES ELEMENTS TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECi FIC PLAN ANO THE GENERAL PLAN, AS WELL AS CHANGES IN OTHER ELEMENTS AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY W[T HI P: THE GENERAL PLAN. A, Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga intends tc prepare General Plan Amendment 90-036 as desc rihed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendments are referred to as "the amendments." (ii) On June 20, 1950, the Council adopted a Resolution of Intent to prepare a Specific Plan for the Eti wa nda North territory in the City's Sphere- of-Influence for the purpose of pre-zoning prior to annexation. (iiiJ The aforementioned pre-zoning must be consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. (iv) The General Plan can be amended in accordance with Sections GaaaD to aaaSS of Lbe California Government Code. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Ra nchc Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds Lhat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council directs staff to prepare amendments to the General Plan generally described in the title of this Resolution for the purpose of providing consistency between the Etiwa nda North Specific Plan and the General P ian and also, for providing internal consistency within the General Plan. `~ I ~ (O/ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 7, 1990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Man e SUBJECT: BCHOOL PARKING SNPORCSNSNT AND CITY-11ID8 RING CITATION BNFORCBNSNT PROC888ING Recommendation It is recommended by staff and the Public Safety Commission that the City Council approve the proposed program of allowing school proctors to issue parking citations on school property. Additionally, it is also recommended the City Council authorize the City to enter into a contract with the Phoenix Group Information Systems Company to provide parking citation processing services. Hackarouad r.. i.. l .. +oon ~Ln A.M to caFU1.. rnm.n:ecinn Ai.~cnfuA chaff 1-n initiate action to enhance the City's approach to parking violations. Specifically, the Commission requested staff to ascertain the necessary procedures to authorize the two high schools located within the City to issue their own parking citations. The Commission also directed staff to investigate approaches whereby City-wide parking citations would be processed and paid directly to the City instead of the County Municipal Court. At the September 4, 1990 meeting of the Public Safety Commission, the Commission unanimously voted its support of the program which would allow school proctors to issue parking citations on school property. California Vehicle Code Section 21113 (aj grants authority to employees of public schools to enforce school parking [tUUidtiOnB Oti 30hi~01 (ii OUhdb. Since other high schools in the Chaffey .joint Union High School District issue parking citations, there is a precedent for this program in the area. Additionally, staff has been in contact with Alta Loma High School and Etiwanda High School, and they have both expressed their interest in participating in this school parking enforcement program. ~D4 School Parking Enforcement November 7, 1990 Page 2 The primary advantage of the school proctors issuing the parking citations on school property is that it reduces demand on Police resources which can then be used in other parts of the community. As part of thi;• program, a new and separate parking citation form has been developed that would not only be used by City Police elsewhere in the Ci*_y, but also by the proctors on school property. Attached is a sample of the proposed citation. In addition to the school parking enforcement program, the Council is also being asked to approve the recommendation of the Public Safety Commission to implement a new parking enforcement processing procedure for the City. This new procedure will be based on the separate parking citations (the same as mentioned earlier) which would include a bail schedule and an envelope to pay the fine by mail. citation processing would be contracted to a private citation service. The service uses a computerized data base system to track all cases.. The fines are deposited directly into the City o n Currently, all parking citations are being forwarded directly to the Municipal Court for disposition and all payments are made directly to the Court. The new proposed procedure would have the citations being processed and payments being made to the City via the City~s contract firm. The services of the contractor include maintenance of citation records, collection of unpaid parking _i~ ~._ •-•~, .:otiL.,o L..... Lu Drir ui ueiinquenc vioxacora, coordination with the Police Department in cases where citations are contested and court appearance is required, and statistical accounting to the City. The cost for printing the separate parking citation booklets would be approximately $550 per 2,500 forms. This number would amount to approximately a one year supply of parking citation forms. The cost for the contract processing service is based on a per citation cost. In the case of the Phoenix Group, that cost is $1.05 per citation. The $1.05 per citation figure quoted by the Phoenix Group is the lowest of the three firms that were contacted. Lockheed Information System charges $1.85 per citation, while West Computil qunted .. Char cf $~.~^ w aGn -ge per tat Because of the nature of the processing contract, the only up front cost for this program would be to purchase the citation forma, but it is felt that the cost of these forms, as well as all other operating costs with this program, would be mare than adequately paid for by the proceeds and revenue generated by the parking fines. L/03 school Parking Enforcement November 7, 1990 Page 3 The Public Safety Commission has reviewed both of the aspects of the enhanced parking violation program. They recommend that the City Council (1) approve authorization of high scF.ools to issue parking citations on school property and (2) approve use of the contract citation service. If approved, the Commission will monitor this grogram and report to the Ccuncil as tho reed arises. DAB/tlr DAB:605 Attachment ~~ YR(7Cl.A'MA7I07~ `WNZ9L~EA,S. the stator of t!u family leas changed drvmat;calfy in tht history of this T(ptian but remains a hack mom! and economic element of tkt community: art6 'WNE$,EflS, it u through the family that each chilli barns the most basic ant important Gssons of hfe: love and respect, wisdom and ta(emnu, stlJutum and achievement; and 'WylER~AS, flit e~perienre ofgrouring up with a suurt, !Doing family environment lays nc~ founduion for a happy pmdactivt adaG/,avJ,• and M1NJlE'12,E' AS, ehe rhih(ren of 4isertcko Cucammea learn th< value of posidsn: citiunrhip within flu family, the conemrtnity, tha ehurehts and elu schods of our ciey, and an gmnet6 t!u f^edons to proctice patriotism, religious 6rfief and community cooperation among neighhors of all6ars~rounds within oar city; and 'WN~y~A,S, rle family mars as flu l(<yseone of the community and mak6s RVneho Cucamonga a speual place and it u approptiaa tha! the imQananct of the family & rteognurtl a(Q'W, 'iyPL'R~"l~' , BZ r7 P7QpCLAf%ED, ekat rke Ciey Councll of eke City of 9epncho Cucamonga dots henhy procGtim tht 7han,~girring 'Wee,E of Sunday, 7~pvemher 1g through Sunday, T(parmher 25, 1990, as Rc771(CXO C41C.'1.~fO~AjA'MlLy'WE~9tr and do h<rchy encourage the citizens of our community in their recognition of tfu importance of eke family out and iu part in rtrcngthcning our children, ow schonk, our chuscher, our dry and our nation a aN... JaNN O. NANN EgIN0 SAL dPIGl1GL10 "Origins! Poor Q!aality tlovembez 6, 1991 Nr. Hied Hullez CI72 0! RAtlCtlO COCAH0tl0A plaon ing Department 1H56f Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173• Re: Sam's Place Deaz tlt. Huller: -f~ECEIYEC-- :(iYOF RANGi0Ci1CAMONG/ v aumuFM: 7111~SNN1 NOV g ~ ~e9~1h1~(1~2(3~4i5z r enclosed nmrerltn plsasm oopiss of tds si9nsA~~~~tatements by the tenants of tns sboppls4,psntsr•fa39hfob•tlw~above- mentionad busioau opstari-Ra;:rs32~t98si::OL.LDs ds residents rlt'nln tIN t1D61mrYgmAtad' !Oe!' lYSmsdmry of Bald cents, stating they EiMYd,Jf>(~ 3aCtY6m• t~ t~"iStiaalon o! tbs Dusinsu nonrs p; 1 M.' p~mla>I(~:.~lac. said statements !n tDe sta;f5- ~ to7Er ~01si1tia 7, 1991 Your anticipated ceopsratlon in lnfs rsgsxd is appreciated. Very truly yostsj';? ,.~~.;.~,,:•; '. .,_ `. MAtltlBRIMO f DtIGO~IO _ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ .... •~l li ~ ,~i':': E'S'"~~' 1~ B ~ :•~:.I .. . JDH/drt •. ~. .~'`,a'r`+~'' ~ ~ sta. ,`.i.: .. ..~c Cv a a-gaL =.y::....-.~. H. Pellegrino ~. ~ k, .. 4 } 9333 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE 110 / RANCHO CUCAMONBA, CA 917301 TEL (71q 980.1100 / FA%17111 911.8810 I AM A TENANT OF THE SHOPPING CENTER IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, which Is within the boundary of the development containing SAM'S PLACE. I have no objection to the extension of their hours to 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. Sunday through Thursday and 11:00 a. m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, es granted by the Plamting Commission on September 12, Isso. ©riginal Poor ~uaucy Deter/tl -3,/ - Business:~L~GL / Signed: Address: ~~/~.!/C..~/LCn¢-/~ Dace: l0 • 3 /. ~o Business: ~f?C ; /~~I t z r~ Signed: ~ G~ !' Addre~: loGl t cA.eu~-ugr/ Date: .7/ 0 Business: ~ ra S-~+~ Signed; Address: /~!Z C~.~c~^-! Dace: Business: ' ~ ~ , ~, „ _ ~, Signed .:, - = ,. Address:. _ _ .1,^ Date: /ri -3 / - 5a _ qr~r .~rc~ pooL Business:' ~~9 Signed: ~?>.C~G~ (-~-~^---- Address: G6ff/ rnf.Gur[rw.v Date: r o~3/ 90 r ~ Business: Jiq~ l~~/i ._~CJ<'/L Signed: ~ /~ ,,-~_ Address: / ! ~' ~ 1~C~r'~-rl-r Date: u. I ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ' Business: ._~ ~ __ - ,:, -- SlgneQ _; ,_. ~ ~~~~ Address: ~ i ~,'- ~~,_~'~c ~; r~i- Date;~/'~/3/~ Signed: ~: Address: ~ ~ SAM'S PLACE Operating Hours Page ,L of '~ Date: . / l5 X90 Business: (~~ f pz . [~e,.~~n! Slgned:L~,.~Cr.R. Dare: //~75'~l/!T__ Business: ~l i~fc. ~i7.~~nG~a Address: /~~(c-s G' (~etin¢l^. z,,; Date: Business: Signed: Address: Business: Address: Signed: Address: Business: Address: Business: Signed: Address: Business: Signed: Business: Signed: Business: Signed: Address: 1 AM A RESIDENT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, residing within three hundred feet (300') of the boundary of the development containing SAN'S PLACE. I have no obJection to the extension of their hours to 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. Sunday through Thursday and 11:00 e.m. to 2:00 a. m. Friday and Saturday, as granted by the Planning Commission on September 12, I990~ ®riginal Poor Quality Date: f I .~ ~_ Signed: Ci., ~ ~l-.G ,~.2~~ i~ Address: 4~ ~l ~ `~ ~! %~~-, ~cn~tr7~ C~ ~i~ ~ Date: ~ ~-"(~-R~1 Signed: /A.S'JL~-rd, Address:. i ~E~~ r~T';,~a rin Date; Date: ~,`• 1 ~~. /% Signed: ~";'~ ~ ~ r,y i. ~,.~~ , Address:'' ~`~ _ ,, ,~ ---, .n ., -. Signed: Address: Datc: Address: Signed: Address: !' fill l Vl' RLIIYU RV UUVLIIII V1Y Vl1 MEMORANDUM GATE: November 5, 1990 T0; Mayor and Members of the City Council FRfIM; Ghallcy Pufrwlli~ Sc~re4a ry ~~ SUBJECT: November 7, 1990 City Council Staff Report - Pdvertised Public Hearing Item No. 6: Environmental Assessment and Specific Plan 89-O1 - Consortium of Etiwa nda North Landowners Attached is a replacement page for Lhe above referenced Staff Report in your current City Council Agenda packet. Please replace pages 309 and 310 with the attached sheet. The highlighted information on replacement page 310 was inadvertently omitted from the original Staff Report. 1 apologize for the inconvenience. /sp cc: Jack Lam Brad Buller Debbie Adams Otto Krou til James Markman Larry Henderson Rick Gomez Mi ki Bra tt ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .: DATE; November 1, 1990 I T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council I FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bra tt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SPEC! FIC PLAN 89-01 - CONSORTIUM OF TIW ANDA NORTH LANDOWNERS - Planning Commission's retomme ndation to deny a Specific Plan for 5,060 dwelling units, 9.6 acres of commercial, and related school, park, and open space uses on 6,755 acres of land generally located north of 24th Street with portions north of Highland Avenue, south of the National Forest Boundary !with portions within the National Forest!, east of the extension of Milliken Avenue, and west of the Fontana City limit. Planning Commission recommends denial without prejudice. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the ~,«,,. ~,oa no <Pli~r;nr „f Oe nial, without ore.iudice, of the subject application. 3 ACKGROU ND & ANALYSIS: E tiwa nda North Soecific Plar.. AL present there are three Etiwa ado North Specific Pian applications of record for approximately the same area. The first version was the subject application, Specific Plan 89-O1, which was fileA in the City in February 1989 and is still incomplete. The environmental review was begun at that time and is still incomplete. The applicant was informed in February 1990 that the d ev eloDment standards section was unacceptable. Meetings between staff and the applicant indicated that there was a conflict between the City's position on development standards and the applicant's position on f1P lIC 1}V. Because of the aforementioned conflict, the applicant has filed a Second version of the Specific Plan in the County. Negotiations with the County began in March 1990. The Specific Plan application was formally filed in the County in May 1990. The third Etiwa nda North Specific Plan is being preDa red by the City. On June 10, 1990, the City Council passed the Resolution of Intent to -309 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SP 89-01 - ETIWANOA NORTH CONSORTIUM November 7, 1990 Page 2 Prepare a Specific Plan, A screen check draft has been reviewed by staff and the draft Dlan is ezpec Led to be available for circulation by mid-November. The primary purpose of the recommended action of denial for the subject application is to clear the table. The subject application has keen inactive in the City since February 1990 and has been superseded by the applicant's submittal of a Specific Pian to the Cuun Cy. This action will somewhat lessen the confusion about which Etiwanda North Specific Plan is being referenced. Planning Commission Public Hea ri nq. On September 26 and October 10, 1990, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject application and approved a Resolution Recommending Denial, without prejudice, of the subject application. /See attached Staff Report of October 10, 1990, and atta chments .~ The reason for the continuance of the public hearing from September 26 to Ortober l0, 1990, was Lo provide the Commission an opportunity to review the correspondence from the applicant. lSee attached "Staff Analysis and Documentation. Letter of September 25, 1990" and also see "Minutes of the Planning Commission for September 26 and October l0, 1990.) • In oral and written testimony, the applicant raised three broad issues as follows: .. Oid the applicant's plans receive adequate review and considers Lion by staff? Z. Did staff make decisions and policies contrary to direction by the Park Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council? 3. What is the present basis for negotiation with the Consortium and with individual landowners? The Planning Commission concurred with staff's response that: Staff diA thoroughly review the applicant's plans. 2. Staff did follow the direction of the Park Commission, Planning C03iiiSS iu'n, and ~',tY r~dnt.l in ,nhn nagtiQng with the applicant. 3. The door is open to negotiation wf th the applicant, but the City's position has changed from reactive to proactive. Proactive Planning for the Etiwanda North Area. Regarding the City's • proactive stance, the City is DreDa ring an Etiwanda North Specific Plan with Airettion from the City Council. The City Council has also suggested that a joint City/County Specific Plan may hest serve the area which is now under the County's ,7u risd ictidn, but is within the City's Sphere-of-Influence. A joint City/County Specific Pian was again found 31D ~.aa a yr nHty t.nv vvunlvlvlvtrti ~GU~Mpp, MEMCIRANDUM ~ c J O ~II ~! 19%% GATE: November 7, 1990 xC: Mayor and City Council {{~~ FROM: Clyde A. Boyd, Chairman ~1j'y~r Public Safety Conunieaion~' EUBJECTt OW RING OP SPEEO LIMIT ON ROCS R u8,[7t~ The Public Safety Coamiaeior. andoxaea and recoamende th@ lowering of the speed limLt on Rochester Avenve (at least b@tween Foothill Boulevard and Baee Llne Road). A 60 mph speed limit appears to be reasonable. Th Le request ie made from tha residents of the Rochester tract and the Commies ion supports this action until Rochester is wid@ned tc it'@ final witlth and construction of Che signal at Foothill Boulevflzd and Rochester Aveau6 ie operational. At Chat time action can be taken to set en appropriate limit if In the meantime, four school bve stops, a Band-dirt shoulder and impending construction work would Lndicate that the resident's request be granted. CAB/emm EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE SAN $ERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Rcvised Draft) ~~a~~ ~~' ~ARCx a9$~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN BERNggDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P eERDARY 5, 1990 AGgELNENT 90-13]: qi5:' PRELIMINARY PINAL ORAPT COONTY HASARDO US Nl SSE MAN ~ Af:BNENT PLAN ADOPT ION• YOU KITH BLN: APPRO yEp: -- The ~BOa rd eo naiders ado pt ton of the Pralimine ry Pinel prafc county Naxa rdoua N t es e Na negesent Plan, car tlf ieatlon of Che Env iro omen cal Impact Re ort nd d p a A deo dtar and app[o val of the Memorandum mF Uncle rata nd ing rlth th B t 1Q e ureau a Land Management re facility sitin (C ti 3 g. on nued from 1/79/90, Ztem 711. d Paul Rye n, Director of Envi[omaental Reel to Services, states Ghee L~ thin item vas conttn ued la et week to meet with the Cities within th C O e ounty baceuee of m.^.ce rat r¢-yarding the Zias: adoption of the Pl O an as presented today, Re says that he gave information co the i l Q C t ea needed in order to maki tneir own dee la ions. Aa of ncw ne „~ I , Eeele all qua scions nave been anarered. Ne indite tea Chet ducin~ i convereat o na wtih the Citie e, tMy did requext a Technical ~ Advisory Committee (rhich rill M lollowd up wltn the Board's approval at a later date) to •uiat Cit lea in preparing their own •~ plena and he eta eea eheG the Clt1u are aleo deairo ua o[ havtnq e ~ much closer working re Ltionsnlp wltn the depe rtmene In order ce ti take care of var SO~t envlronmentel af[aln Lhet they have © . On motion by Supervl'aer Hammock, sewnded by Supervisor Nikela, and carried, the Board: 1) Adopts the Preliminary Pinal DraLt Cmunty Naxardoua xaete Management Plan a• the Pinal CRNNPl 71 Certi[iea the Envl ronmantwl Impact Report and CAe Addendum for the Coun[y Hasardo ua MasN Management PLn whlcn new Men pre- perad in aceo rdan em wlen CEDA1 ]1 Directs the Clerk to [Sla a Notlq of Deta rm Snationt al APpro ws Agreement 90-157 aPprovlnq Ma Namorandw of Under- atsndlnq with tAm Bureau o[ Gnd Management regard ing Ee ciliey aielnq. PABBEO ANp ADOPTED by CM BaaCd a[ Sapa[Vl sees OC the County of San Earn and inp, State o[ Gll[oan la, bl' the (ollovinq vote: AYES: Nlkala, Malkm[, Bammock, Riordan NOES: Nona AHSEMf: Tucoci _. ,_ ,.. - .^~ GIP ' ~~ '.~ ..-. Pq & ~~IP~i'... ~ ... • • • • • • ' .. STATE OF CAUFORMA CWNTY OF SAN BFMIANgNt} 4' I, EAACFNE s'PROAi, n..t N.b B~-~ 3'9..wmm.a dw Comwya Ew hwabr wnih fn. larsgelap to b • hal, Nut wle emmel npv a dm ear Bewa al Suparsisgs, M von a Ina mwlWSta Onwsnl. w tlm eenm ewe Bard at M mmsdq a 7/S/9p lr IEe me IX4-Iq/an w/agr.r RM M/q[.r ~ < QOr Cm. Eblalaal. Auditor v/ 6 age., RW[ faAR., q¢dlwllq• U 1[ L w ~Cmryllao w/wgr.r rY^L4[~~f4II~ i ErmweM, Sim a CYilomu, A~1 IskM M esm Ik~~fBirl M+Ana a ~~6 .... , ~d` f//// i V .. ~~ 4 'fin ~.__ ... C3~tAirw r to 1 1 J EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Revise6 Draft) . March 1969 The ipformatioe ewtaiped hereto is a summary of pch of the etrapten iu the Couaty of San Beraardioo Rcviud Deft Hasardons Waste Mam~emcot Plaa (CHWMP). 7'he t;oab aad policia/actions are Dresepted io entirety after uch chapter anmmary. Chapter 2 has po recommended Boals or politic; while Chapter 11 iacludd a recommeaded uhedule for implemeatatioa of CHWhiP propatW. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Proper hazardous waste management constitutes one of the state's major cnvironmmtal conecras. Statewide recognition of the aced for better methods of hazardous waste management came about by the intense media attention on improper disposal practices. Hazardous chemicals play an important role in our modern society. They contribute to the manufacture of a vast array of coommer produces (i,e.. televisions, computers, automobiles, and medicines) aed the convenieDCe of consumer services (i.e., dry cleaners, automotive repair). While thex goods and services add to our quality of life, they also cause the generation of hazardous waste. Reducing our reliance on hazardous materials would reduce the generation of waste. Hazardous waste will continue to be generated, however, since some materials have no substitutes. For this reason, a comprehensive plan is necessary to identify and promote programs for the reduction of hazardous waste and the safe management of wastes that remain after treatment or recycling. AB 2918 (Chapter 1501, Statotes of 1986) and amending legislation SB 47J (Chapter ! 167, Statutes of 1987), AB 3206 (Chapter 1389, Statutes of 1968), AH 3209 (Chapter 378, Statutes of 1988), and AB 31 (pending), recognized the need to have a comprehensive program for management of wastes by authorizing counties to develop a local hazardous waste management plan. The law has as iU goals: [he safe and responsible management of hoodoos waste; the effective siting of hazardous waste hcilities that involves local and state governments, tho public, and private industry; end the prevention of permanent hazardous waste disposal into the land or emission iD the air without first processing the waste by an economically and technically feasible alternative technology. On March 31, 1987 the County of San Bernardino Board of $UDCrvI30rs authorized the preparation of ehe County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (CHWMP). A resolution was adopted ^od xnt to the State Department of Health Services specifying the County's desire to prepare the CHWMP. The Plaa is consistent with state law and the Guidelines for Preparation of Hazardous Wnte Maagement Plans prepared by the Department of Health Services, June 1967, A fine coDY of the CNWMP must be submitted to the California Department of Health Services (DHS) by Juoe t, i9g9. State law specifies that the CHWMP must be approved by a majority of the cities withie the County which contain a majority of tha population of the iecorponted uea of the County. Once the Plan has been approved by DHS, the County has Igo days from the date the DHS approves the CHWMP to incorporate ^pplica ble portions of the Ptao by reference into the County a general es-1 plan, or enact an ordinance requiring all applicable zoning, subdivision, conditional use permit, and variance decisions to be consistent with the CHWMP. The cities are also rcquired by state law to adopt some form of a Hazardous Waste Maoagemeat Plao. The law specifies that cities are required to do one of the following: 1) adopt a City Hazardous Waste Management Plaa which is consistent with the CHWMP; 2) incorDOrate aDDlicable portions oC the CHWMP into the city's general Dlan, or 3) enact an ordinance which requires [hat all aDDlicable zoning, subdivision, conditional use permit, and variance decisions`to Ite consistent with the applicable portion of the CHWV~. Snte law does not limit the city's authority to attach conditions to the issuance of a land ux aDDlica[ion or to establish requiremeata or aitio;; criteria different from those identified in the CHWMP. Any such coaditioea or criteria established by a city must be substantiated as necessary to protect the public health and safety since the conditions or criteria may De appealed to the State Appeal Board (SB 477, Chapter 1167, Statutes of 1987). The CHWMP serves as the primar}~ planning document for the management of hazardous waste in San Bern rdino County. It is an element of the County's General Pbn and is comistent with other elements of the General Plao. The CHWMP identifies the types and amounts of wastes generated in the County, esubliah es programs for managing thex wastes, identifies an applicatioe review pnweas Cor the siting of specified hazardous wastc lacilitics, identifies mechanisms for reducing the amount of waste generated in the County, apA identifies goals and policies and actions for hazardous waste manaaement. The CHWMP was prepared with full and mcanin¢ful involvement of the public. Information rc¢ardin¢ the Countv's CHWMP Advisory Committee and public involvement efforts is presented in the discussion on public DarticiDation, Chapter 13. GOALS ANO POLIC7FS/ACTIONS The County Dlan is intended to Dreurve the local land use process, protect the local environment, and provide s framework for ensuring that needed facilities are sited. The followiea overall goals and policies/actions are the underlying gwls uxd to devaop the CHWMP. Gwht G•1-1 To protect the dealth sad welfare of the Dublie, environment, sad economy of San Bernardino County through a comprehensive program ehae ensures safe and eesoonsibte management of haurdous wute/material, G-1.2 To reduce the amount o1' haurdous waste generated io the County by Drovidiag improved Drognms Cor haurdous wute source reduction sad recycling. G•1.3 To eaWte proper management of hazardous 'waste/material by ideatifyipg sad eocouragina safe and efficient methods for ES-2 managing Aturdoua wane/material and by providing Cor needed haardoua wore facilities in San Bernardino County. G-:-4 To D*event hazardous waste from being permanently disposed into land,-or emitted into the air without being processed by an economically and technically feasible alternative technology. G•1-5 To involve the Dublie, industry, and government in a comprehensive process that develops snlutioaa for the management and disposal of hazardous waste. G-1-b To establish a framework far tAe devfloDment of San Beroardinc Countyl share of hazardom wore facititiea G•1-7 To recognize that consumers coetribute to the generatioe of hazardous waste, thus, limiting iedustrial growth is not an appropriate meant oC reducing the County's commitment in hazardous waste management. G•1-a To encourage and develop public education programs on the proDCr management and disposal of hazardous waste. Policies/ACtioaa P/A-1-1 Becauu • Deed exists [o augment current programs for the proper management of hazardous waste and to address recent legislation, this jurisdiction shill work with industry an4 the public in identifying safe and responsible solutioro for the management and disposal of hazardous wastes. 7, ;,.;.; ..[,. rHWMP coolies County-wide, the County and the oitiea shall work together to prepare and update the s.nwivi7 .. well as its imDlementin{ ordinances and to devetop and implement programs which reduce the amount and tonicity of the hazardous waste generated in the County. P/A-1-3 Becauu the Southern California Hazardous Waste Management Authority (Authority) provides as aDDroDriatt forum Cor local ieput regarding the regional aitini of hanrdoua waste facilities, tAia jurisdiction shall Coetieue its Darticipatiop in the Authority. P/A-1.4 Because proper hwrdoua wore mmagemebt is one o[ the state's critipl environmeohl concerns, the County and the cities shall work with the Authority sad the state t0 address regional and statewide planning iaues a necesary to achieve cnviroemeatally an8 ceanamia!!y effective Aszardous waste management oil a lord, regional, and autewide basis. ES-3 CHAPTER 2 EXiSTiNG PROGRAMS FOR DEALING WITH HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND HAZARDOUS WASTES The County has several detsartmenh involved in hazardous material/waste programs: the Environmental Health Services Department, the Fire Department, the Land Management Department, the County Agricultural Commissioner, the Solid Waste hfaaagement Department, the Public Health Department, the Sheriffs Office, and the District Attorney. Of these departments, the Enviroomeatd Health Services Department has responsibility for the majority of programs which deal with hazardous material and waste issues. The County Environmental Health Services Department (DEHS) administers over sight programs related to hazardous waste sad materiel management. Some of thou programs include the generator parmit program, the underground storage rank program, the hazardous materials handler program, the household hazardous waste coliectioe program, radiological health, avatar ht gieae, and Ised use and anise control. In addition, the DEHS coordinates emergeecy «sponsc activities end, through its Air Pollution Cor trot District, DEHS is responsible for regulating and monitoring the air emissions from industry, Other agencies involved in haurdous materials and warted management include: the South Coast Air Quality Managemert District, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, sod Publicly Owned Treatment Works. ES-1 CHAPTER 3 WASTE GENERATION LEVELS, FACILITY INVENTORY, AND NEEDS ASSESSI~NT Comprehensive and accurete data on hazardous waste generation levels and management practices are critical elements of a Hazardous Waste Management plan, A clear understanding of current waste generation and maaagcmcnt practices provides the basis for identifying program and feciliey needs, Comprehensive data provide a quantitative understanding oC what type and amount of hazardous wute~ are generated; by whom; why; and how it is treated and/or dispoud. Analysis of the data will identify opportunities for waste minimization. Knowledge of waste generation levels apd management practices also serve to the basis for developing or fine cooing regulatory compliance programs, as well as educa[ionel and technical assistance programs. This information identifies areas to emphasize in the training of regulatory compliance inspectors and emergency responders. Finally, current and projected waste generation levels, when coupled with data regarding treatment capacity should identify facility needs. The primary source oC the data presented in this chapter is the California Dcpartment of Health Services (DNS) Hazardous Waste Information System (HWIS). The HWIS tacks all manifested shipments of hazardous waste in California. The data regarding haurdous waste shipments into and out of San Bernardino County during 19g6 and 19g7 were provided to the County Department of Environmental Health Services (DENS) by the state. This data was analyzed and suDDlemepted with information from DENS files, Biennial Reports (as ^vailable), and telephone interviews with individual generator. tnmoortera and facilitie• re. n~rr<m rvs err rat Waste n ration v ~• The San Bernardino County hazardous waste generators ship about 65,000 tons of waste offsite (average of data for 1966 and 1967). The primary industries that contributed to this waste generation include the primary metal industries, utilities, and railroad transportarion. These industries generate a variety of wute including metal containing liquids, waste oil, and baghouu wallas. The amount of wastes shipped offsite represent 5% of the total waste generated in the County. About 9S% (or 1,2 million toes) of the wote ^re managed oasite at the place where they are generated. The Couaty hu two commeroial futilities currently in operation (Chemwest Industries and Broca. Incorporatedi. Hosed on a cnmpsrilen of the existing capacity of these commercial facilitie apd the present required treatment capacity, the County Aa exteu capacity in other recycling, but may need to hove futilities for oil rewvary, wiveat recovery, incineratioe, and stabilization. Further reduction or recycling of these wastes is possible, which would lessen the demand Cor these facilities. ES•S P o'e t d Waite Gener t'oe Lev la About 67,000 tons of hazardous waste are anticipated to be managed offsite in the year 2000. Of this amount, waste oil, baghouse waste, and oily sludge are the largest categories of waste. The industrial sources of this projected amount of waste are the same as currant sources. The County will have a projected eaDacitY deficiency for treatment and recycling facilities. Chemwest Industries, the existing recycling facility, has flied for closure tad, will not function as a commercial facility. Discussion The analysis of the data Drovidea considerable insight into hazardous waste management practices in San Bernardino County ae6 Drovitle the basis for development of hazardous waste management policies in the remainder of this Plan. It is expected that an increasing amount of the hazardous waste now shipped offsite for treatment aed/or disposal will in the future be managed onsite. For example, one major generator of metal corttsieing liquids has obtained regulatory approve: for onsite recycling operations, thereby eliminating a significant waste stream. Although this trend is anticipated, the protections provided do not include an estimate of the extent of change ttom offsite to onsite management. While Chapter 5 esnblishes a framework Cor siting specified hazardous waste facilities, clearly the data establish a need for applying the siting criteria sad land use review procedures for onsite treatment and/or disposal facilities as well, This issue is addressed in ChsDter 6 of this Plan. GOALS AND POLtC1ES/ACTIONS Goals G•]•1 To establish a comprehensive and accurate data base to assist in program development and to assess facility capacity needs. GJ•2 To ensure that the date base is maintained and updated « gularty ao that program Dlaening is based on current information. Policies/ACtiom P/A-3.1 Because correct data collection and management Drectica do not allow wy compilation or inter0rention, this jurisdiction ahaii develo6 a umprehcaaiye :utonsated waste tracking system that integrates data from all hazardous materials and hazardous waste Drognms, The system shill be baud oe geognphicd, physical sad land uu characteristics. P/A•3.2 Because DHS ip their comments oa the Draft Ha:ardous Waste Maasgemeet Plan requires that the County identify deficiencies ES-6 and prioritize the manner is which the County will address those deficiencies, this jurisdiction shall address the following deficiencies: 1. perform a waste minimization asussment of all major haurdous wuta producing indus[ria sod assist them in achieving maximum waste minimization as specified in Chapter q; 2. Identify industries subject to pretreatment requirement and artist them in sohieving comp!!ance; r 3. tnclade estimate! of clean uD ants from Expenditure Plan tits at [dcy become available. P/A-3-3 [kcause improved data would enable the County to develop stronger policy on hazardous wasto management and becauu local concerns change, this juriWiction shalt update the data on sp annual basis and revix the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan at (east once every three years. The background information and dan aaall be made secessible to other agencies and juritdictiona when:ver possible. ES•7 CHAPTER 1 HASTE MINHMZATION Waste minimization is ^n umbrella term chat refers to source reduction and recycling. Source Reduction is defined a any process that reduces or eliminates the amount of waste being generated; it wually includes processes within the manufacturing or operating system of a business. Recycling refers to the uaa, reuse, or reelamatlon of a wszte cieher onsi;c or offsite after it is generated by a particular process. Waste minimization, as used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), denotes the reduction, to the extent possible, of hazardous waste that is generated or subsequently treated, stored, or disposed. tt includes source reduction or recycling efforts that: q reduce the total volume or quantity of hazardous waste, or 2) reduce the toxicity of hazardous waste, or both. OC the two approaches to waste minimization, source reduction is the preferred method of reducing wastes, Sourec reduction aqd recycling are identified as preferred waste reduction options under the EPA's use of the term waste minimization. Treatment technologies Should be considered only after aceeDtable waste minimization methods have been identified. This priority for wore reduction differs from the State Deputment of Health Services (DHS) preferred options; the DHS includes treatment u a preferred wafte reduction method. The DHS promotes the use of onsite treatment measures as a way oC decreasing a county's overall need for offsite facilities. The EPA priority is ustd in this Plan because the County comiders source reduction and recycling as the optimum methods for reducing wastes. moo,. uen+yru inn county DEHS has had an informal waste minimization program since 19g3. The program has cogsisted of providing waste reduction and management information to generators through the County hazardous waste generator program, distribution of waste reduction information through a quarterly newsletter sent to all hazardous waste generators in the County, and Co-sponsorship of a ono-day waste reduction workshop with the University of California Riverside Extension Program. Recycling of waste is strongly encouraged through the existing program, Although present efforts to encourage sad promote waste minimization have been suecwful, erg expanded program is necessary to provide more comprehensive wistanee to all induatriea, to document quantitativAy the value of these ware miaimizatioe methods, to maintaie persopnel with ezpertias in ware minimiutioq as a retouece for industry, sad to ensure that local iaduatry is taking full advaatage ni wssts siaimizaiiau gpporiuaiiita. GOAIS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS In order to reduce the overall amount of waste generated in San Bernardino County, ao expagded waste minimization program should be established. ES•6 The following goals and policies/actions set forth guidelines Cor the recommended waste minimization Drogram for the County. Gwb G-4-1 To minimize the generation of hazardous waste in San Bernardino County, to the extent possible. Policies/Actiom P/A-4-1 Becauu reducing the amount of wsst¢ {encored in this County is an effective mechanism for reducing the poteetial imDect of these wastes to the public health and safety end the environment, and beeauu legislation encourages the reduction, to the extent feasible, of hazudous waste, this jurisdiction shall encourage and promote practices that will, in order of priority: I) reduce the use of hazardous materials and the generation of hazardous waste at their source; 2) recycle the remaining hazardous wastes for reuu; and 3) treat those wastes which cannot be reduced at the source or rtcyeled. Only residuals from waste recycling and treatment shall be land disposed. P/A-4.2 Becauu industry often lacks the technical information or in- house expertise to develop waste minimization programs, and additiond resources are necessary ^t the local level to assist industry in developing such Drognma, the County shall expand the waste minimiution program to include education, technical assistance, economic incentives, and recognition elements, Educational materials •nd technical assistance should be the first priority of the Drogram. Suth ioformatioo and assistance are the coroentone to industry particiDUion in waste minimization efforts. Other measures, like economic incentives ^ad recognition measures, should also be implemented, but these are of a lower priority. The program Shall consist of, but not be limited to, the (ollowigg compooend: EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE; - Develop an expanded educatiogal Drogram on waste migimiutioe rhgt includes: I) brochures, publintions, and Ddaler! td aler! the public and iadaatry ntl the imporn6ee of waste minimiution a well a describe aDDropriue reduction teehgologia and 2) tudioviwd aids on waste minimiution that can be taken to businesses, trade gswciatiom god DuDlis mutin{s. - Hold semiggn god workshops for industry on wgste mfoimiutiog ttchniqun god regulgtory issues. Some of ES-9 these uminars or workshops could be co-sponsored with IoC01 universities, Chambers oC Commerce, or the DHS, Encourage trade associations and industry to form an industry task force to promote information exchange. Maintain librnry of technical reference materials and Prepare a waste reduction resource directory. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Hire a waste minimization specialist to coordinate the program implementation and provide on-going assistance to generators on waste minimization techniques. Provide training to hazardous waste generator inspectors on waste minimization techniques. The inspectors will inCOrpnrate Waste minim128tIOn 8tan3menta into routine inspections and should be knowledgeable about the effectiveness of these techniques. Provide waste audits on request end incorporate into routine inspections. ECONOMIC INCENTIVES Provide information on availability of pooled loan fund and start grants for developing innovative technology Reduce permit ten for Itrms that achIDVe waste minimization. RECOGNITION OF OUTSTANDING PROGRAMS Develop a method for recognizing firms that have achieved notable success in reducing hazardous waste. Also, the program shall assist industry is preparing state and federal waste minimization reports. A coDY of the report shall be submitted to the County DENS at the time of permit renewal so that an snood report no be developed to measure the Dragras of wore minimization efforts The annual waste minimization report prepared by DEHS shall Identify activities undertaken by the department and provid@ aomo indication of the amount of hazardous wastes redncad as a result of local efforb. P/A-4-3 Becauu 6aviag the County conduct a waste minimization audit is a voluntary action by a business and those businesses that participate may sot be in full compliance with regulatory requiremeaa, the County shall addreu violations a specified in state law, The County shall develop is conjunction with the District Attorney policies fdr deciding on such violations ES-10 pursuaet to the requirements set forth in Section 25SS2 0( the California Hulth and Safety Code. The policies developed to addrgs such violations shall include, but not be limited to, the following: I) Whether the action is a koowieg, willful, negligent, or inadvertent violation; 2) Whether the violator agrees to the schedule of compliaece specified by the County; and 3) Whether the violation was discovered durieg as onsite consultation carried put punuaet to this chapter. Ie addition, the County may take eeforeemeot action, or refer the violation for enforcement actioe, is accordance with state law. ES• I 1 CHAPTERS SITING OF SPECIFIED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES Development of specified hazardous waste facilities requires permits from stale and local ^gencies, The State Department of Health Services is responsible for issuing hazardous waste facility permits and for ensuring that operating conditiors impoxd on the approval of • facility are met. It .s the responsibility of Foca! govcrnmeats, howevee, to see thar a facility is sited in areas with compatible land uxs, to ensure that conditions of approval oo land ux permits are implemented and carried out for the duration of the project and to rrspond to hazardous materiel/waste emergencies. At the local level, both discretionary and ministerial land use permits would be requires. Local land use authority is derived from police powers which were reserved to the states by the Federal Constitution and delegated to cities and counties in California by Article XI, Section 7 of the State Constitution. Outline oC the r,.r.l Appliation Revi w P eg The types of applications required for local evaluation of a specified hazardous waste facility are listed below. The required Iocai land use permits include: Application to Apply the Zoning Overlay of "Specified Hazardous Waste Facility' to the project site ,end respective buffer (see Policy P/A-5-4). °'•~ °W`••~• ovv„~~„vu 1~~rrw anus, Vic rer Olll") Special Use Permit (issued by the County Environmental Health Service Direeloq required as a condition of approval on the discretionary permit) Ministerial Fermin from Building, Grading, Flood Control, etc A Site Approval (Conditional Use Permit), or applicable city application, is necaxry to site specified hazardous wale facilities in San Bernardino County. Along with the Conditional Use Permit application, an application to apply the specified hasardous waste facility zoning overlay is required for all propoxd specified hazardous ware facilities. The overlay applies to the project site aad associated buffer. Requiting the overlay restricts Future development to uxa tha are compatible vtilh specified haardous vast: ixcili;ica. The County df Sin Bernardino Land iNanagement Department, Office of Planning, or applicable City department would process the bad ux application. Other departments, such a the The County of Sae Bernardino refers to its discretionary land ux ^pplicuion u a 'Site Approvd". It is equivden[ to a Conditional Use Permit Application. ES-12 Environmeptal Health Services Oepartment, will have a significant role in reviewing sod commenting on ao application. The following information outlines the local application review process for evaluating a Jpecified hezardaux waste facility proposal. The requirements added by state law are included ie the iaformatioo below. Refer to Figure 5-1 for an illustration of the items mentioned, The Figure includes a description of the state process for informatianai purposes slate it msy be a concurrent process. a) A[ lease 90 days prior io the submittal of a iormai application [he eDDlicaat must submit a Notice of Ioteat (NOI) to the Officc of Pcrmit Aaaiatance (in the State O[fice of Planning end Reacarch) end with the appliubit city or County jurisdiction. The NOi provides a complete deacriDtioo of the nature and scope of the project. The local agency notifies the public about the proposed project by publishing notices in a newspaper oC general circulation, Dossing notices fn the location where the project is proposed, and mailing notices to owner of property contiguous with the proposed pro lace a1fC. b) Subsequent to the NOi the Offiee of Permit Assistanco convenes a public melting ip the affected city or County to inform the public 0o the nature and scope of the propoud project. The meeting also considers the procedures necessary for review of a specified hazarderus waste facility aDDlieatfoe, c) Withie 40 days after receiving the NOt the local agencf• aDDOints a oven member Local Asaeoment Committee, The Committee meta with the applicant to determine the terms and conditions for project ayym rai. Tne negusietioni muss iOCYa on [ne prOICC[[00 01 [ne public health and safety and the environment, as well at the fiscal welfare through special benefits and compensation. The ramDOSition of the Committee consists oC three representatives o[ the community at large, two representatives of toviropmental or public intere:it grOYDS, end two representatives of affected bminesses and industries. d) The aDDlicant DarticiData io a pro-applieatiop meeting which is set up with the Iocai government agency (u required by the Health and Safety Code, Section 25199.7 (e)). This conference provides an opportunity for eke County and any apDliable department to advise the aDDlieaat on project consistency with the General Plan and CHWh~ before a formal aDDlfcation is submitted a well a tr. respond to questions raguding the permit proceu. Most cities have a similar procedure. e) Formal application may bt submitted to a city or the County once these initial steps Gave been undert-ken. BotA the Site Approval Application (Conditional Use Permft ADPlication) apd the specified kaurdoua waste facility soiling overlay aDDllcatioa are required. State law requires the permitting agency to decide op the comDleteaeu of the aDPlicatioa and to notify [he apDlicanf regarding ES-13 completeness within 30 days from the date [hc applications were submitted. () Within 10 days from the date the sDPlication was deemed complete, and within 60 days from the notice of application completeness, the Office of Permit Assistance holds a poanapplieation meeting among the lead and responsible agencies, the aDDiicant, the Local Assessmcnt Committee, and the public. The purpose of [he meeting is to determine the issues of concern to [he public and the permitting agencies. Once these iuues have been heard the applicant and tF.e Local Assessment Committee meet regardi~ the terms and conditions acceptable to the community. The Act includes a provision for the Local Assaament Committee (LAC) to hire a consultant to review the project. The applicant would pay a fee established by the local agency. In addition, if differences between the LAC and the applicant cannot be «solved, the OPA may recommend the use of a mediator. The aDDl;cant would pay half the cost for mediation. g) When the application has been found complete by the permitting agency, an initial study of the project will be made to identify the significant impacts on the environment. If one or more significant impacts are identified then an Environmental ImDSCt ReDOrt (EIR) is prepared. If oo Significant impacts are found or it the significant impacts can be mitigated, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. When preparing an EIR the lead agency is required to send out a notice to all applicable agencies regarding the prcDaration of the EIR. A seopieg hearing can be performed by the lead agency to obtain public input. After • Draft EIR has been released the public and responsible ^senciq have 45 days io which to comment on the adequacy of the Dnft. The Draft is considered 6y the Environmental Review Committee in a public meeting. The environmental document is certified by the deeision•making body (in this case the Board of Supervisors) when ^ decision is made on a project. Refer to P/A-S- 4 for the issues that will be evaluated at part of the environmental analysis. h) A noticed public hearing is then scheduled before [he Planning Commiuion for consideration of the site aDDroval (Conditional Use Permit) apd ^pplieation of the :oiling overlay, A staff report is prepared by the lead ageeey which deuribes the project, soy issues of eoeeern, and • recommepdatiop for aDDroval or denial of the land use aDDlicatiohs. The Local Asusameat Committee also prepares a «pon that is submitted to both the Planning Commission end the Board of Supervisors or the City Coupeil. It iaciudes the Committee's recommendations for approval or denial of the project and any terms and conditions which have beep negotiated. Tha Plteniog Commision forwards its recommendations to the Board of Supervisors or Ciey Council. A decision on the aDDlication is made by the Board of Supervisors or City Council, at • noticed public hearing. Any interested panne or the applicant may file an aDpeU on the aDDroval of the project or the conditions of approval with the State Appeal ES•14 m Y. Y 6 C C y T a E S L w 8 e ~~ V ~S'H~ yT . ~y Q Q q L G C y C 2 T N CQ .l 0 • ~ N s ,~ ~~ 5 ~ ¢ ~~ I . i SS3JOild 3LV1S W SS3JOl1d'1VJ0'I Board, within 30 days of that decision. A decision on the appeal will be based oo coosisteacy with an adopted, approved CHWMP. i) A Special Use Permit is issued as a condition oC approval on the Site Approval (Conditional Use Permit). The purpose of this permit is to ensure that conditions of approval are carried out. j) If no appeals are filed on the land use aDDlicatioas, ministerial permits may be issued. These permits may include permits from building and safety. grading, environmental health, flood control, etc. Siting Criteria ` State laa requires the CHWtviP to include siting criteria and designate general areas where [he Criteria might aDplY. Siting criteria set forth a structure for evaluating DroDOSals for specified hazardous waste facilities and serve to focus the evaluation of facility proposals on critical issues. Siting criteria represent a uniform set oC standards applied to all applications, yet they are designed with some flexibility depending on the tyDC of facility and the proposed site location. Siting criteria arc used for evaluating a project at a particular site. When used along with general plan policies, the siting criteria determine the suitability of a site for a specified hazardous waste facility proposal. The uu oC the siting criteria and General Plan policies are pert of the full application review and environmental analysis required of all aDDlications for speeif ied hazardous waste facilities under state law. The complete siting criteria follow the DoliciesJactions of this chapter. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS The following goals, policies, and actions shall be implemented to ensure that specified hazardous waste Acilities are reviewed according to the procedures identified in state law and ailed in the most environmentally preferred locations, Two terms are used to identity the implementing agency. The term 'this jurisdiction' «fers to the applicable city or county. Where County and 'this jurisdictioM are used, the policy apDlia to both the County of San Bernardino and the applicable governmental body, Gwls G-S-1 To establish an effective sad expeditious application review process for siting specified haurdous waste facilities that includes extepsive Public DarticiDation. G-S•2 To apply a uniform set of criteria to the siting of specified hazardous wute hcilitio in the County for the protection of the public health and slaty end the environment. G-S-3 To amore coordination among agencies and County departments in the review of all specified hazardous waste facility applications within the County. ES-16 G-S-4 To protect vital groundwater resources for present and future beneficial uses. Policip aad Ae[iosw P/A-3-i Because specified hazardous waste facilities shall only be sited in areas where land uua have been deemed compatible with such facilities by the local jurisdiction, as applicant for a sDeeified hazardous waste facility molt apply for a Site ADDraval ( Copditiopal Use Permit) and • zoning amendment. The zoning amendment applies the Specified Hazardous Waste Facility overlay (as defined in P/A-3-e) to the Drojeut site aad buffer ^rea. The aDDlicaat shall meet all Drovisiom o[ the sDeeified hazardous wgste facility overlay district (see Policy P/A-3.4) as well as other general Dlsn fnd ordinapce provisions. P/A-3-2 Because the evalustion of a project application is a costly and time consuming effort and the public involvement demands a large expense: A) The applicant shall food the public notification efforts including Dubiic hearing notices to residents aad property owners within 3000 feet of the propoud project boundary, legal and display advertisements in local newspapers aad a Da Der of general circulatioe, and a sign (2e sq. ft.) to be displayed on or near the project site (pursuant to the Goveromeet Code, Section 63090). B) The applicant shall fund activities relating to the review snd evaluation of a specified haurdous waste facility application, including stiff time, coosulnnn hired to assist the Local Assessment Committee with application review, review by any applicable city, and pre-application assessments. (Government Code Section 65911.3 and the Health and Safety Code, Section 25199.7) Policies/AMiom Rmoired of Li+ leriwsietioa P/A-3-3 Because the County «cognixes it's reapoosibility for siting Deeded specified hazardous wore facilities proposed in epviroementdiy sound locations, thin County will consider applications far specified haaedous waste faeilieiea. Prnnesais to site such facilities le the County must include spDiications for ^ Site Approval (Cooditional Use Permit) and for a specified Hasardous Waste Ftcillty overlay (see P/A-i1). A decision on the applications will be bued oo making the following findings: a. The proposed project 1f eoes8tezt with the Drovisians of the General Plao, Development Code (zoning ordinance), ES-11 the CHW1dP including the siting criteria, aced the public _ resources code (Section 21000, ct. seq.). b. The facility location and/or design adequately protect public health, safety, fad the environment. c. The project is propoud in as :race where present and future surrounding oats are compatible with the specified hazardous waste facility. P/A-5-4 Because local land use plans and moing ordiaances are required by state law to specifically address the permitting of specified hazardous waste facilities and such plans and ordinances da not address requirements for then facilities, sad because applicants Cor specified hazardous waste facilities are required to apply for a project-specific request to include the hazardous waste facility overlay op the project site end buffer zone sod existing ordiaances do not define or specify the requirements of such an overlay, this jariadietion shall amend the DeveloDmeot Code (or Zotiy Ordisua) to require W specified hazardous waste facilities to be permitted only with an approved Site Approval (Conditional Uae Permit) is areas with • zoning overlay of Specified Hazardow Wute Facility. The overlay shall tx aDDlicsble to all specified hazardous waste facility applications. The purpose of the overlay is to ensure that facilities are sited io area that protect public health, safety, welfare, and the environment to assign the specified Hazardous Waste Facility overlay to the project site and buffer au rna~ incumyariuic eaca canws oc permi[rvd is the locate; tp identify permitted uses of the overlay; and to outline the permit review procedures. The Development Code (or zoning ordiauaa) shall define the Specified Harardoos Waste Facility overlay u coouining the following: A regairemeat that apeci(iW hazardous waste facilities may bate in armia load nse dutricn (or mne) with an apDrovW Site Approval (Conditional Vac Permit) sad Specified Naardow Mutt Facility Overay. Land disposal facilities and iecioeratioo facilities shall locate in Resource Conservation Districn (or cone) and other area with a population of lea than 20 pmDle Der square mile with an apDrovW Specified Hwrdow Wnte Facility Overlay. TratmeaL InClnCfat100, recycling, atonge, and tnwfer facilities should itsate in Regional Industrial districts (heavy indwtrial mac or equivalat) with an approved Specified Harardow Waste Facility Overlay. lacineratioo facilities ahUl not, 4awever, ba IoatW in area where emissions from the facility could directly impact food crops or livestock. (See disco»ion in Section 3.3.1 of this chapter.) ES-16 2. The sitio{ criteria preaeated is this chapter (]taming o0 Pate Sdg). The criteria shall be adopted as development standards that shall be met along with other politic] of the General Plae and provi]ions of the Development Code (zoom{ ordipanca) before a facility is approved. Compliance with the ]itin{ criteria ]hall be evaluated as part of the CnvlrOOmental analy]13. 3. The aDpliwtioa prawdarp set oat m AB 294E (Chapter ISO4, Snntw of 19x6) for the review of specified hanrdoua same facility appliwtioaa 1. A regaireaseat that all specified haardom waste facility application arc abject to • Special Vu Permit The purpose of the Special Use Permit ]halt bC to evaluate the operation and mopitorin{ plan of the facility, to ensure the facility has adequate measures for monitoring on-going impacts to sir quality, groundwater, and environmentally sensitive resources, to evaluate the types and quantities of waste] that will De treated or di]poud of at the facility, and to require periodic impactions of the facility to ensure eonditioas of approval are carried out. 5. A regairea[eat that all specified haurdon watts facility application iaelade iaforamtioo abpat the project proponath peat bttsiaeaa pneticaa 6. Discretioury appliwtioa review regairemeon to ensure dcvelopen arc aware of the di[feregt atudica that will be required is the eaviroaneanl analysis rhea assassin{ the rcui v: iaciiiq apptiwuoaa A reporting and monitoring program shall be adapted to mitigate or avoid significant eeviroameptsl impacts as required by AB 3180 (Chapter 1232, Statutes of 1966). The different issues that must be studied consist of, but are qot limited to, the following: a) Aa analysis of the project's potential impact to surface sad groundwater resources as well as public water supplies. Tha study shall identify monitoring sad mitiption mwsurca that enure protection of viral surface sad groundwater «rourees for the life of the project. b) An evduatioo of the project's impact m air quality sad the wasLteeey of the projns! with air quality re{uia[iops anti the local air quality plans. The evalanioa must wmider toxic air wataminats, wind pattern, sad as aasesameat of the project's impost to PSD aqd aoa•aminmeat weal c) An analysis of potential mineral deposits throw{h a site characterization study. ES•19 d) A review of the adequacy and capacity of the propoxd traospormtion routes including an identification of highway accident rates. (Refer [o Chapter 10, P/A-10-3, for other issues to address in the study) e) An assessment of risk on the population that evaluates the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific types of wastes which will be handled, the design features of the 1lcility, an evaluation of potential air emissions frpm proposed facility, aad any need for buffers from residences, immobile DOpnlatiom, aad CnVlrnnmenlaily aeasltlVe lesgarCCa. f) If a facility Dropoxs to handle acutely hazardous waste, •o analysis of the maximum credible accident may be necessary pursuant to AB 3777 (Chapter 1260, Statutes of 1986). The study shell take into consideration the quantity and types of wastes that could be received at the facility, the deaigo features, and the planned operational pnctices at the facility. Based on the above items, the study shall provide an estimate of the distance over which ^ny effects would carry, options for reducing the risk, end procedures for dealing with the effects, including recommendations for an aDproDriate buffer distance, g) An evaluation of the project's impact to the socioeconomic chancxristitt of the affected iuriMierinn anA an •~rr•ramrnr of thr .nnnnm.n viability of the project. h) An evaluation of cultural, archaeological, and paleontological resources on the project site and surrounding buffer. P/A-5-5 Because several agencies (i.e. Air Quality agencies, Regional Water Quality Control Bmrd, Department of Health Services) and local governments (County, cilia and Special Districts) will be involved in the permitting of specified hazardous waste facilities, this jurisdiction shall request all applicable agencies •nd local government departments to participate io a meeting of • specified hazardous wore facility aDDlication at the Dre- aDDlintion spge (u required by Health and Safety Code, Seeeiae 23149.7 fe)). The porptme Of tha mseting is to discuss and document issues of conttrn to all appropriate agencies as well as application review requirements agd time frames. This jurisdiction will assist the aDDlicagt id developio{ a matrix of all «viewing agencies aad agency requirements before a formal aDDliation is accepted. ES•20 P/A•5.6 Becaux specified hazardous waste facilities have a potential for adverse imDacn ov the evvirovmeot, ail aD~lications shall comply with the policies of the CHWMP and the siting criteria and shall be the subject of enviroemental analysis, The evvirovmeoul analysis shall be done as a consolidated effort among applicable County Departments. Compliance with the siting criteria shall be evaluated ie the cnvironmeetal analysis. P/A-5.7 Because this jurisdiction needs to assure that wastewater is apDroDtiately diuhaged, this jurisdiction shall require specified hazudous waste faoititisa gtverating tzeated wastewater to diuharge to the Besets Ava Interceptor (SARI line), to the Chino Nooreelaimable Wute Line (Brine Live), or any future industrial waste line or ao approved new technology that treats or elimiaata the discharge. Wastewater shall meet all applicable agency requirements for diuharge to these waste ling. P/A•5.8 Because ^ significant portion of County land falls under federal jurisdiction, the Bureau of Laod Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service, and the DeDartmeot of Defense (DOD), and the policies of DOD exclude the development of specified haurdous waste facilities, and because Indian lands compriu another significant component and Native American Tribal Couecils have expressed coaeere over the development of specified hszardous waste facilities in the Coun[y, the County shall take the following actions: A. Complete a Memorsvdum of Understanding with the Bureau of Laod Management (BLM) regarding review of specified hazardous waste applications for those projects proposed on land nwnrA by res. rlf u• B. Notify and request involvement of Native American Tribal Couecils in the review of ell specified haurdous waste facility applications iv their region; and C. Prohibit specified haurdous waste facilites on private lands iv the Death Valley and Joshua Tree National Monuments, Mitchell Caverm State Park, National Forest Lands admieistered by the US. Forest Service, the East Mopve National Scenic Area, sad soy Wilderness Area designated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or wiideroen study ara designated by BLM a minble for a Wllderoea Area Dunuaet to the Federal Laod Management Polley Act of 1976. WAen Coogreu acts oo Wilderoeu Areas thin gDlicy shall be amended to be ;anaisteut with thole Wildergesn Areas. P/A•5-9 Because sate law authorises s tax (not exeuding 10% of gross receipts) og as approved specified haurdom wore hcility, and these facilities Gave a potential to impact the environment, public hesith, and public arnica, this jurisdiction shell set ES-21 aside ^ portion of the revenue for programs that encourage safe end responsible maoagement of hazardous waste. P/A-5-10 Because the siting criteria and the policies of this elan should be applied uniformly throughout the County in order to ensure that effective maoagement oC hazardous waste and that facilities are sited only in environmentally sound locations, the County shall encourage dl the Cities within the County to adopt the CHWMP cad the siting criteria and development policies. P/A-S-II Because specified hazardous warts facility proposals could impact proposed city or County redevelopment projects, this jurisdictioa shall inform the applicable redevelopment agency oC all specified hazardous wore facility eDDlicatioos. P/A-5-12 Because the CHWI~ sets forth comprehensive criteria for siting Deeded specified hazardous waste facilities, the siting criteria should be used to determine the suitability of projects in ell County, city, state, and federal lands. P/A•5.13 Because the Department of Defense (DOD) contributes significantly to hazardous waste production in the County as a result of site remediation efforts, DOD operations, and businesses producing products for DOD, this plan encourages the following: A) Thst the DOD implement waste reduction efforts to the maximum extent possible. B) That the DOD obtain appropriate permitl from local jurisdictions and allow periodic iosDectioo of facilities for C) That [he DOD consider undertaking Ignd exchange or lease agreemen[s wi!h industry desirieg to site specified hazardous waste facilities ie DOD property. D) That the DOD undertake hazardous waste management efforts which are consistent with the goals and policies/actions of this Plan. P/MS-14 Because cement kilos can use certain hazardous wastes as a ucooduy fuel and the uu of such fuel significantly reduces large amounts of waste and may result in improved air emissions, this jurisdictioa shill encourage heilities in San Bernardino County with cement kiln to use certain hazardous wastes as alte:paiva sources of energy, Gaiy whcra improvcmrnts in air emissions eta be achieved. P/A-S•15 Becauu Section b3300 of the California Government Code places a dual mandate oa how cities and rnuotia must consider development within a sphere of iafiueoce, the County shall ensure that dl applicatiods for specified hazardous waste facilities are reviewed for consistency with the goals and ES-22 policies of the 1989 County General Plan regarding development in a sphere of influence (LU-d and LU-9). P/A-5-16 Becauu 7Ti1's have the potential to impact public health and safety and the environment, this jurisdiction shell apply the siting procedures to I'CU's on a wx-bywu basis. Cax by eau determination ahUl h baxd on the characteristics of the propoud project cite, including its proximity to residential and/or immobile populations, length of operation io any given area, the amount and type oC hazardous wrote to be trnted, the proposed method of treatment, and the equipment and land area necessary to operate the ttU. ' In order to exempt a 7'IU from compliance with the siting criteria ^ed zoning overlay requirement of policy P/A-5.4, a demonatntioo must be made that the ttU falls under an existing land use permit for ao exiuiog business or facility, or, the ttU is a minor, temporary uu apDrovable by a ministerial action. The determination of applicability shall be made by the director of the city or County Planning Department and the County Environmental ssealth Services department with input from other aDDlicable departments. If resolution of the applicability of the siting criteria or policy P/A-5-4 cannot be reached, the deeisioo shall tx made by the city or County Planning Commit ion at a noticed public hearieg. P/A-5-17 Because San Hanardino County obtains about g5% of in drinking water from groundwater and a aigoifinnt psrcentsge of the population of Southern Cdiforaia dao depends on San Hernaidino County groundwater for ib beneficial uses, end because inaDDroDriately aired development (including specified hazardous waste facilities) have the potential to adversely impact groundwater, this jurisdiction shall develop a Countywide groundwater Droteetioa seruegy. The strategy should consider specific policies apd programs for regulation of potential sources of pollution as well as identify mechanisms to detect and correct possible impacb to the groundwater. ES-2} S777NG CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES (Refer to Policies P/A-S-4 AND P/A-56) PROXIhfITY TO RESIDENCES A 2000 foot buffer zone from residences shall be required for any land disoosai facility upleu the owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County or City aed the State Department of Hceith Services that a buffer zone of less than 2000 fcct is adequate for the protection of public health and safety. To determine the appropriate buffer a rink assessment shall be required which considers the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific type of wastes that will be handled, the design features of the facility, and any peed for buffering residential arcas or other sensitive areas from potential accidents or adverse emissions from a proposed facility. b. A risk assessment shall be required for any treatment. recvclinn. storage. and tnns(er futilities. The risk tfsessment Should consider the physical ^pd chemical chnretteristics of the specific type of wafts that will be handled, the design of the facility, and toy need for buffering residential areas or other sensitive areas from potential aetidents or adverse emissions from fl proposed facility. 2. PROXIb/ITY TO fAAfOBILE POPULATIONS Specified hazardous waste faciliysg shall be sited so that no significant risk is presented to the immobile population. An adequate buffer between the hauedous waste facility and the immobile population shall be established by a risk asxament. The risk assessment shall considsr the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific types of wastes which will Dt handled and the design fea[uref of the facility and proximity to immobile populations. Immobile populations include schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, prison facilities, futilities for the moottlly ill, etc. 3. PRO)[111LTY TO PUBLIC FACILITIES Soeci led harardoyL waste facilities should be sited io such a manner as they do not adversely impact the public health and safety of large numbers of people io public areas or people is public facilities. An adequate buffer shall be determined by a risk asusfmsnt. ESd~ I. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES Specified havrdous waste faciliti • should be located in areas where emergency resDOnx capabilities and public water and xwer serviccs are ^vailable. A'hen facilities are located in dear[ or rural areas where public xrvices are not rpdily available, privately-owned onsite water, sewer, and emergency xrvices (elf-sufficient services) may be used. ENSURE THE STRITCTUQ ar. g's'ABILfYY OF 7H FACI I'i'Y S. FLOOD PLAIN AREAS a. teed disoo•±i facJ}ijsa may sot be located in areas subject to 100-year events even with Drotectioo (CFR, Title 40, Section 264.15 (b) and CCR Ti He 22, see Section 66391 (a)(I1)(b)). Flood plain areas include areas subject to flooding by dam or levee failure and natural causes such as river flooding, rainfall or snowmelt, tsunamis, niches and coastal flooding. b. Treatment reevelina. storage ^nd tnn•fer fa il't' s may be located io areas subject to 100-year floodiog if designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to prevent failure due to such events. Flood plain etas include areas mbject to flooding by dam or levee failure and natural causes such as river flooding, rainfall or snowmelt, tsunamis, x(ehea and coastal flooding. 6. PROXIMITY TO ACTIVE OR RECENTLY ACTIVE FAULTS Nn •rvrifiM bs•eAmu m f..:u... .~...u w. . -- r~7::,~. ~:C.L, 2vv ~cc. of an active or receolly active fault. (California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Section 66391 (a) (Ip A (1) and (2). 7. UNSTABLE SOILS a. !-and disno•±I hcilitin shall not be located in arena of potential rapid geologic change (Title 23, Subchapter IS. Section 2531 (e) of the CCR). b. Treatment rmvclin store and [Host [ facil't' a may be looted is araa of potential rabid gcologic change if designed, wnatructed, maintained, sad oDenttA to prevcat failure u a rani[ of such chaoga (Title 23, Subchapter IS, Section 2531 (e) of the CCR). ES•25 b. DEP'IN TO GROUNDWATER a. Land disooaal fseiliNes shall be located where natural geologic features providt t aatunl barrier that Dreveets contamination of vital groundwater resources by waste and leachate (Title 23, Subchapter I5, Scetion 2531 (a) of the CCR) and which mcct thr. siting requirements of the State Water Resourccs Control Board. b. Treatment. recvclina_ storage. and 'transfer facilities shall be located where natural geologic fwtures prevent the contamination of groundwater unless the engineering design and construction of the facility and contginment structures are capable of preventing significnat adverse impacts to groundwater. 9. MAJOR RECHARGE AREAS FOR AQUIFERS a. j,gnd disposal facilities should be prohibited within any area known or suspected to be suDDlYing principal recharge [o a regional aquifer as defined in state, regional, or General plans. The County General Plan and Bulletin rrllg, 1975, of the California Department of Water Resources identify the following ea regional aquifers: Ames Valley (7.16) Antelope Valey (b•44) Bear Valley (S•9) Resumer Vallev (7.15) Big Meadows V¢Iley (g-7) Caves Canyon Valley (6-3g) CoDDer Mountain Valley (7•II) Dale Valley (7.9) Deadman Valley (7.13 EI Mirage ValieY (b•43) Harper VaI1eY (bd7) Heleadale Fault Valley (7.48) Iroe Ridge Area (7-SO) Johnson Valley (7•Ig) Kape Wnh Area (b•t9) Lavic Yaliey (7.14) Lost Horu Valley (7•SI) Lower Mojave River Valley (6-10) Lucxme YaBev f7-i93 Meanf Valley (1-17) . Middle Mojave River Valley (6-11) Moron{o Valley (7.20) Needles Valley (7.44) Pipes Canyon Fault Valley (7.49) Seven Oaks Valley (g-g) Troy Valley (ti-39) ES-26 Twentynine Palm Valley (7-10) UDper Mojave River Valley (6-42) Warren Va11eY (7-12) Upper-Santa Aoa Valley (6-2) b. Teat rat ecvcl' •tonae and tnn•fe fac'1't'e may be located is Drigcipai recharge areas if hcilitiea are designed, constructed, maintained, and operated to prevent accidental releaxs. 10. PERMEABILITY OF SURFICIAL MATERIALS a. Land disoosal hcilities shall be located in areas where underlying geology provides impermeability meeting the requiremen[a of the SWRCB (DUnuant to Title 23, Subchapter !5, Section 2531 (b) (q of the California Code of Regulations). b. Treatment. recvclina. stor9ae. aed transfer facilities may be sited io areaa where soils are permeable if adequate engineered features such as spill containment, monitoring, and inspection measures ere included in the project design and construction. PAOTECf AIR QUALITY 1I. NON-ATTAINMENT AIR AREAS Specified hanrdons waste facilities may bt located in non•attainment areaa if the facilities meet the plans ^nd regulations of the air quality agency of each district. 12. CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN PREVENTION OF SIGNiFTCANT DETERIORATION (PSD) AREAS Specified huardous waste facilitim may be located in PSD areas iC facilities meet the plans and regulations oC the air quality agency of each district. These facilities, however, may not located near or within national parks, wilderness and memorial areas, and other similarly dediated areas, a specified in the Clean Air Act. 13. NETLAIgDS Snetified harardoua waste facilitira ihdl be prohibited from impairing the viability of wetlands such a witwgter, fmh water, grad brackish marshes, awgmps, and bogs inupdated Dy surface or groundwater with a frequency to support, under normgl circumstgnces, prevglence of vegerative or aqugtic life which « quires saturated soil conditions for growth grad reproduction, ga defined in general, regiongl, state, end ES-27 federal plans. A protective butter zone shall be established based on a biological resource study ^ad risk asxssmeot. 14. HABRATS OF THREATENED, RARE, OR ENDANGERED SPECIES cxcif'ed ha ardou• waste facilitio shall bo prohibited from impairing the viability of habitats of threatened, rare, or endangered species as defined in general, regional, state, and federal plans. A protective buffer zone shall be established based on a biological resource study end risk asxssment. 15. PRIME AGRICULTURAL LANDS Specified hazardous waste heilitie• may noC be sited on prime agricultural finds as defined in California law and adopted local land ux plans unltm an overriding public need is served. When siting hazardous wastc management facilities ip these areas, overriding public service needs must be demonstrated. 16. RECREATTONAL, CULTURAL, OR AESTHETIC RESOVRI:ES Spccificd harardo ~• waste IL~tliti shall not be IocateC in recreational, cultural, or apthetie rewuree areas except low volume transfer and storage facilities which are necessary to handle hazardous waste generated by visitors, workers, or residents in these areas. Rccreatiooal, cultnrd, end aesthetic resource areas includt public and/or private lands having local, regiond, state, or national significance, value or importance such as: national, state, regions) county and local na.a• a..n ..~.::,j_; ~;~o, Juaiv,ic rewurces; wtld and scenic riven; xenic highways; ecological preserves; public and private praaervatioa areas; and othar lands of local, regional, state, or national significance. 17. AREAS OF POTENTIAL MINERAL DEPOSITS Specified Aazardou• waste facilities should not be )pentad so as to preclude extraction of minerals necessary to sustain the economy of the State. ig. MILRARY LANDS Public specified haurdous waste facilities shall not be sited on milinry lands punuaat to DOD policy. ES4g 19. PROXDaHTY TO AREA$ OF HASTE GENERATION a. Land diseosai facilities may be located more distant from waste generatiop sources than other facilities bepuae of their reQuiremeot for brger land nod buffo areas. b. Treatment. recvclina. aonae. and transfer facilities shall be close to hazardons route geperatioa sources to minimize the risks of tnnspoftation. 20. PROXUOTY TO MAJOR TRANSPORTATION ROUTES Specified hazudoua wn[e [geilities shall have good access to and from major transportation routes (flare or iatcrstate divided highways). 21. MINIMIZE TRANSPORT THROUGH MINOR ROUTES Specified havrdoua route facilities should be ailed so that road petworks leading to major transportation routes do not Dass through rnideatisl neighborhoods, should minimize resideptial frontages, and should be demonstrated to be safe with « gard to road deign and copstructiop, accidept rates, ezces»ve traffic, etc. 22. LOCAT-ONAL RESTRICI'fONS D[JE TO TRANSPORTATION ROUTES a. Specified hanrdpu waste facilitiu shall pot be located where highways Sd, 62, apd 71 ue used as major tnosporhtion routes unl'aa • ar„Av of ~._~_•i--CGtiJ~ vCw as ayccii ieY la Y/A•IU•3 identifies mitiption mpsures which pn be implemented to makC the particular route suitable for its use u a major route. b. Low volume transfer and atonae facilities may bC located in then areas if necessary to manage the hazardous wastes from that area. ES•29 CHAPTER 6 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS State and Cederal goverommts have established programs which require businesses that handle hanrdous substances to prepare an inventory of the hazardous substance3 stored and to provide that list to s local agency designated ro administer the pro{ram. The purpose of ffiese disclasurc laws is to have information available to first responders in the event of an cmergeecy at the site and to provide information [o local residents rcgardieg the kinds sad amounts of chemicals stored in their communities. The legislation did not ieclude standards for above ground storage o! hazardous substances es Dart oC its mandate, Assembly Bill 21 g5 (Chapter 1167, Statutes of 19{6) mandates that all businesses handling hazardous aubatances Drovide to the Iosai administering agency ae inventory aed location of hazardous mbuancea Stored on the property. This law applies to all businesxs which handle st any one time more than S00 pound3, SS {alloos, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) of a hazardous material. The Department of Environmental Health Services (DENS) has bete designated the administerin{ agency for purposes of the AB 2185 program for the County of San Bernardino, including the incorporated cities (California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95). This chapter supports existing efforts in the underground tank program and recommends a continued effort in the maintenance of underground tanK rCWfUS ^nd an annual myun uu .iris yr uauu.. nw•• a,om.v storage requirements are recommended for inclusion in County implementing ordinances. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G-6-I To reduce the risks posed by the storage of hazardous substances in above ground ranks and coenieen. G-6-2 To minimiu the threat of eontaminalion of grouodwatcr from leaking underground storage tanks containing hazardous materials. G6-3 To minimize the threat to residential area3 from the use of hazardous marerials, Policia/Actions P/A-6.1 Because some waste reduction technolo{ia si{nificantly reduce or eliminate the amount of hazardous waste `enerated since they are a put of the monufacturih{ process, and because the equipment for these technologies can malfunction causing the ES•30 potential for • haurdous substance release, the County shall amend Uniform Environmental Code to require all hazardous waste generator and hturdous material handlers to report any such equipment malfunction or upset which msy cause hazardous waste to be generated. P/A-6-2 Because above ground storage of hazardous materials msy pose a threat to public health and ssfety tad the eovirooment and County ordinances do sot include snndards for above ground storage, sad becaux all 6wrdoua materiel handlers may not be easily identified, the Couaty shall do the following: A, Revix Division 3 of the Uniform Environmental Health Code to mtablia6 above ground stooge standards for haurdous materials The ordiaaaee shall include, but not be limited to, the following requirements: - secondary coatsioment of subspaces; - segregation of incompatible materials; - stooge of haurdom subspncm rastriMed to an area with • surface impervious [o the suMtanee; - methods to prevent runroff of rain attar and/or collection of rain water if area is not covered; - fencing and/or other security of the arcs aith adequate signs Drexnt to inform of tht Drexnee of hazardous materials; • emergency equipment to be ntored onsite as appropriate (eg. proper abwrbtot to dad with • spill or fn appropriate neutralizing agent); and • minimum storage disuncu from adjacent land uses. B. Establish a system for identifying all handlers of hazardous substshca with such measures as: - review of telephone 4irectories and other business listings; - exchange oC information with city code enforcement officers, local fire agencies, and city business license OfflCta; and - field surveys as accessary. C. Review periodically each place of business registered in the haurdom materiel handler program to verity the 6asardons aubataaa inventory on file and [o advise the Moeller of uft stooge praeeices. P/A-6-3 Becaux leaking underground storage pnks threaten groundweler resources, the County shall do the following: A. Amsod the underground storage rank ordinance to mainnin ip consistency with sett sad federal requiremems. ES•31 B. Continue to enforce the Uniform Environmental Health Code by such measures as plea review and impectioa of " new unk inataliations, Inapectioa of exiatieg tanks at least ogee every three years, and iespection at all tank removals. C. Maintain records of tank performance by reviewing on- going monitoring Drograms to evaluate whether current requirements provide adequate protection, or whether areas with high groundwater (fit 30 feet or leu) require more stringent Drotection. D. Develop • Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with each of the three Regional Water Quality Control hoards which identifies the respective duties of the Water Hoard and the DEHS regarding oversight of mitigation efforts. E. Prepare ae annual report detailing the number of tanks under permit with the County, the nature of their contents, monitorin{ programs in uu, the number of facilities ieapected, avd ^ listing of sites where an unauthorized releau hu occurred and its clean-up status. P;A-6-4 Because certain home oceupatiooa use and store hazardous materials and the uu and storage of haurdous materials in residential areas may you a threat to the public, this jurisdiction shall continue to prohibit businesses under ^ Home Occupation Permit to store hazardous materials for commercial .:A. ,1 V:M~Hn of ~A.~ nl{n .Awll Mw u.. •eu subject to enforcement action by the lord jurisdiction and/or Cire authority. Io addition, the County shall coordinate with cities in developing a list of home occupations that uu hazardous materials or generate hazardous waste within city jurisdictions. the line shall be distributed to city and county planning departments. ES•32 CHAPTER? REGULATORY PROGRAM FOR GENERATORS (Incladiag TnmpOrten and new TSD Facilities) The federal law goverping hazardous route management, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Aet (RCRA), originally exempted hazardous waste generators producing Ieu than 1000 kg (2200 Ibs) per month of hazardous waste from compliance with that law. The 1981 ameedmenta to RCRA, (the Hazardous and Solid Nute Amendmenn of 1981, HSWA), lowered the exemption threshold so that buaiaesses producing more than 100 kg (220 Ibs) per month of hazardous waste are now subject to RCRA. California has taken a different approach. Califorgin has never had any threshold value for determining compliance with the hazardous waste management requirements. Any business which produces a hazardous waste must manage that waste in accordance with state requirements regardless of the amount produced. Although many of the California laws have been in effect since the seventies, local enforcement of these laws began io i9g3 with the MOU agreement, In September of 1983, the DEHS entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of HCS(th Services. Through this MOU, DEHS agreed to monitor sIl busiaestta who generate or produce hazardous waste within the County to eesure that they comply with ell state laws and regulations pertaining to she generation and management of hazudous waste. Approximately 2100 businesses have been identifieA a+ ornnw m.+ of hazardous waste; then businesses are under permit with the DEHS. Extensive efforts (such as 'door to door" sweeps, compiling lists of businesses likely to generate hazardous waste baud oo Standard Identification Clusification Codes) were uadermken by DEHS to identify generators. Despite these efforts, the DENS estimates that there may be as many as 300 more hazardous ware {enenton doing buineu within the County which the DEHS has yet to identify. Additional measum ve neeesury to identify a]I geaentors. The business license and reeewal form is recommended in this plan because of its succeu iq many counties and cities when uxd as • screening tool for determining whether businesses handle Aaurdous wore. Eduatioml auisnnce, mistaau with disposal of wane, cad eomidention of the needs of the limited quantity generator (produce Ieu than 3 Mlloea or 30 pounds of hssardons waste) must atl tx addresud in order rn sesnre genentora comply with regulatory prognms. ES•33 GOALS AND POLICIES/AGTiONS Goals G•7.1 To ensure that all busincaus in the County that use hazardous materials and generate haurdous waste properly manage these substances. G-7-2 To provide haurdous waste generators with the necessary tools to comply wish existing regulations by continuing generator education and technical assistance efforts. G-7.3 To determine the need for apd feasibility of providing disposal assistance to small quaetity generators. Policies/AMions P/A•7.1 Because hazardous waste generators need a permit Crom DEHS and such a permit requirement ensures on-going compliance with regulations, and because not all hazardous waste generators have been identified in this County, this jurisdiction shall continue its effora to identify hazardous waste generators by wing field surveys tad instituting cooperative efforts with fire agencies to exchange information. P/.4-7-2 Because s consistent method of identifying businesses that use and generate hazardous substances must be in place, this jurisdiction shall use n business license (or similar requirement) and its annual renewal to determine whether businesses handle hazardous substances. Thin policy shall 6e implemented by the following actions: A. Development of an agreement with all incorporated cities within the County to ensure that questions regarding the use of hazardous materials and the generation of hazardous wasro are included on both the city's busineu license application form and its business licenu renewal form. The information obtained from these questions shell be shared with the DENS. E. Initiation of a business licenu or similar requirement for the unincorporated portions of the County to be used for information retrieval purposes. Question shall request information oa the uu of hazardous materials sad the generation of haurdous waste. P/A•7.3 Hecawe many hazardous waste generator are not aware of local, state, and federal requiremeeta, and providing information about these «quiremeab could ensure compliance with regulttions, the DENS hazardous wore compliance program shall continue to include a strong emphasis on educational assistance to hazardous waste generators. Every effort shall be ES•]1 made to make then Dro{rams accessiblt to sll arcas of the County. The following actions shall be taken to achieve this policy: A. DENS shall contioue to publish a quarterly newsletter providin{ the latent iaformatioo on new laws and rcgulations af[ectin{ hazardous wale {eeentors. H. DENS shall cohtiaue to Du6lish wad update the San Bernardino County Haardous Write Generator's Handbook which includes inform^tioe on aDDliable regulations, contacts at other re{ulatory a(encies, wed reuurces such as the ante tachan{e, recycl¢rs and haulers available to generator. C. DENS shall contioue to sponsor workahoDS on regulatory compliance with an added effort to schedule conferences in the deurt portion of the County. P/A-7-4 Becauu dasardous waste {enerators have expressed an interest in havia{ astistsnce with disposal of hazardous write, Chia jurisdiction shall perform a dettiled eeeds assessment and feasibility study for a transfer aution and/or County coordination of hazardous wale pink uD is all areas of the County. The study shill include comidentioa of the types of wastes oeedin{ mans{emenb opportunities for source reducrion, recyclia{ and treatment, sod the likelihood of private enterDriae meetio{ this need. If ap unmet need is found, this jurisdiction shall determine the feasibility of Drovidin{ that unmet need. ES~33 CHAPT£Ra LAND USE REQUIREMENTS POR HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLERS Public conccrn exish regarding the potential thrent to areas surrounding businesses which uu 6aurdoua materials and generate haurdous wastes, particularly with regard to the distance of such busineaxa to residential and immobile populations as well as major drinking water aquifers. While lantl use or zoning regulations provide • mechanism for siting indusL-ial and commercial development. the use of hazardous substances by existing businesses may not be considered when changes to land use or zoning are adopted or resideutial development is approved. CopsequentlY. residential areas may be sited Dear these busipesus (or vice versa). To address this concern, information on the amount and type of hazardous materials and wastes used by new or modified businesus should be part of the discretionary review process. Development standards for the review of new or modified businesuz should also be established. A two stage aF~Droach is necessary for the prover siting of businesses [hat use hazardous materials and generate hazardous waste. The first consists of requiring preliminary information regarding hazardous materiab and waste management practices ^t the time of application submission. The second requires that this preliminary information De documented as specified in state law through a completed busigesa plan, waste minimization plan, and, if applicable, a Risk Management Prevention Program. These plans would be completed prior to final approval of the land use application. Ail businesses are subject to the requirement for these plans whether or not they srz filing for a land uu application. GOALS AND POILICTES/ACTIONS The following gos is and policies/actions require the adoption of regulations for the consideration of new or modified businesses using hazardous materials and generating hazardous waste. Goals G-g•1 To ensure that busineaus locating within the County incorporate available rink management sad waste minimization practices into their operations. G•8-2 To minimise the risk of exposurr, to haurdous substances by the ruideptial and immobile populations. Policies/Aetiopa P/A-g-1 Becauu information regarding the amounts apd types of haardous materials uud sad hazardous waste generated are important hcton to consider when siting pew development or reviewing existing busipeascs, this jurisdiction shall: ES-76 1) Amend the Development Codc (zoning ordinancc) to: a) require new busineues to submit detailed information reNrdieg the amounts noel types of hazardous ma[erials used - noel haurdous wastes generated, the business procedures implemented to manage these hazardous substances, noel the emergency procedures employed in the event of as aecideet. The applicant must demonstrate that the business operations are consistent with hazardous material/route legislation. b) require new or modified~businesxs to complete a busineu plan, waste mIn101Zat10O piHn, Ind, if aDDlicable, a Riak IrLnagement and Prevention Program prior to final approval of a land uu permit for a new business or modification of ae existing busineu. The requirements specified in AB 3777 (Chapter 1260, Statutes of 1986) and AH 3205 (Chapter IS, Statutes of 1988) regarding the applicability of the' RMPP shall be identified in the amendment. The plans shall be submitted to the County DEHS for review and aDDrovel. 2) Expand outreach efforts to city and County planning agencies, city and County building and Safety deDertments, and the real estate industry regardio{ new planning and reporting requi«ments as well as the identification of the types of businesses which may be affected by these requirements. Such • program should include the development of brochures and flyers describing the requirements and an identifieatioa of types of busincues P/A•g•2 Becaase certain quantities of acutely hazardato materials could pose a threat to the public health and safety and the environment, this jurisdiction shall amend the Development Code (zoning ordinance) to «quire a conditional use permit for sll busioeuea ar Governmental facilities handling acutely hazardous materials in excea of SS Nllona, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet. P/A•g•3 Because idaDDroDriatelY aileA industrial facilities pose a threat to the public, aed beeansa soaipg ordinances do not idedtify quantity or use limitations for haurdoto material/waste, and identifying restriction could addreu future copeeros with the siting of industrid heilities handling hazardow material/route, :hss jurisdiction shag cvaluatc the fassbitiiy of c;tsblishirg siting criteria the identify the types and amounts of materiels allowed within particular zoning designation. The study shall identify a list of ehemieels and aDDroDriue thresholds which would nuu a buainea to be subject to specific land use reserictiopa, recommeed changes is the Development Code (zoding ordinance) for review of such ieduatries, and identify FS•37 the advaetages and disadvantages of implementing such an ordieaece. ES•3a CHAPTER 9 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE Household products can be classified into five general groups: household CleenCi%, OatOmptlvC 6rod UCb, home malntenanCe and imploVCIDent prodUCta, lawn end garden products, ^od misceilanaous items like batteries or pool chemicals. These products are common household items. They ere often discarded improperly because most individuals do not recognize their potential danger Improper disposal of household hazardous waste (HHW) may lead to injury to refuse collecton and egiliDment damage, and when disposed to land, HHW may contaminate soil or groundwater. DIsDOSaI to landfills, storm drains, sanitary sewer systems, and the ground, as well as evaporation and storage of these products, can lead [o human health and environmental copcerni. In 1984 the County of San Bernardino established a comprehensive program for addressing the HHW problem. The program began as a pilot project under a grant from the California Waste Resources Control Board. The study dealt with the feasibility of separating HHW from the municipal waste stream and disposing of it properly. The County opened two permanent collection centers in February, 1965 as Dart of the grant project, one at the County Agricultural Commissioner's office in San Bernardino and the other ^t the Centel Valley Fire Station in Fontana. Based on the success of the pilot program, the Board of Supervisors approved County funding to continue the program and subsequently approved funding to expand the Drognm. The County HHW management program includes; o Five permanent year-round collection centers. o One-day collection programs called "Round-Ups' in areas of the County not served by the existing collection centers. o One•day publicity and collection "events" to publicize and GOCOUragC the YSC Of Cxl3ling CCnItrS. o An on-going public education and information effort to increase public awareness of HHW issues and also provide educa[ionel materials t0 schools and interested groups. With the loca[ioa of oply five permanent collection centers County wide, there art vast areas of the County which are pot bring fnlly nerved by this program. the inerwaed popularity of these events has increased the Dumber of users to a point where storage size of the Sap Bernardino site may not De adequate. New permanent eolleetioa centers may bt added to the program since the Rougd-Up events are very labor intensive. The Roupd-Up events require trained ptfaOnnei to accept, sort, and package large amounts of waste for processing (recycling, treatment, or disposal) in • fixed amoupt of time. Alternative measares to expand the ES-39 program should also 6e considered, however. The program should be expanded to include collection centers a[ landfills, enforcement efforts a[ landfills -to discourage improper disposal, and continued public education efforts. Participatioe by the County Solid Waste Management Department is recommended. GOAIS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G-9.1 To ensure the effective management. end disposal of household hazardous waste County-wide, G•9.2 To prohibit unauthorized disposal of houuhold hazardous waste in facilities that handle wastes. G•9.3 To inform the Dublie about the aced Cor prober disposal oC household hazardous waste and [o inform the Dublie of the availability of the tollectioo centers. Policies/Actiota P/A•9-1 Because recent studies at moniciDal landfills show evidence of contamination from hazardous wastes, this jurisdiction shall establish a stroe; enforcement program to Drereet 6isposal of household hazardous waste ie municipal refuse facilities. P/A-9.2 Because houuhold hazardous waste is disposed at local landfills and because a strong enforcement program will detect fi;nificant ,..,.. of hn„s~hnlA havsrdom waste, this jurisdiction shall develop household hazardous waste diversion programs at all facilities where waste is handled, to properly manage these wastes. Whenever pouible, collection scoters should be established at appropriate futilities with public ascesa. P/A•9-3 Because [he capacity at collectiob ceatcrs can not accommodate the needs of the entire County wed the diversion Drogram will add to the amoupt of haurdous wastes requiring special management, this jurisdiction shall addreu the County's needs is effectively managing houuhold haurdous waste by establishing a lar;er tender and Oroteaiog facility. P/A•9-a Becauu public eduatioe efforts have alerted the Dublit about proper methods for disposal of household hazardous waste as wtlf as [hc sr:liability of houuhold toileatioa ccrtea, and beuuu there is a need to wntiane rhea efforts for County- wide Dublie awareness, this iarisdictioo shall continue its comprehensive public eduatiob Drogram. ES•10 CF!APTER 10 TRANSPORTATION Hazardous waste is tnosported 6y truck out of the County to treatmept, recyclipg, and disposal facilities, and into the County from other areas for trea[mept. In 19gti, San lkraardino County exported about 41,000 tons of hazardous waste; hazardoua wore imported into the County comprised about 9,000 tons While no surreal estimates axial for transport of hazardous materials, aatioaal primates suggest that tramportatioo of hazardous wale is relatively iasigpificap[ compared to the amount of hazardous materials tramported. Theca hazardous materials become hazardous waste when spilled in the environment. Fedcra! and state agencies are rnpomible for the development and enforcement of the transportation regulations throughout the state. Federal and State legislation require the proper identificstioo oC transported materials, set minimum standards for cargo coptaipers, apd require that hazardous waste be tracked from generation to ultimate disposal. The use of the uniform maeifeft/shiDDing DaDen. Dlacarding of transportation vehicles, vehicle safety inspections and the use of a uniform format for reporting incidents which involve a hazardoua materiel release, have resulted from these regulations. Although Cederal and state agencies are responsible for ¢he development and enforcement of tramportatioa regulstions, the local }urisdiction can have a role in the transportation of hazardouf material/waste in the County. The local jurisdiction may designate routes, restrict hours of rramm.drinn nsrirnr. nnrifir. rinn . nnb fn_. n..re:n nn..nn.:....f . , nnu vn,n waste, and provide educational and training oDDOrtupities ~ in the transportatioe of hazardoua material/wasto. Ia additiop, the local jurisdictiop may implemept road mitigation measures, such as repair of roadways, to reduce the risk of transporting hazardous materials/wastes. Federal law preempts spy state or local requirement which is inconsistent w[th the requiremepts of the Haurdous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA), A state or local requirement may sot be preempted if the DOT (or the courn) determipes that the state or local requirement provides an equd or greater level of protectiop to the public than the fcderd requirement. Fedenl law specifies, however, that the state or local requirement Gapot uareawpably burden commerce. GOAL4 AND POWt:fES/ACTIONS The foilowiaa goals sad policies/actloaa addreu the aced to enure safe tnmporatioe of hazardoua waste througA the County. Goals G-10-1 To epaure the nfe tnmporsatiop of hazudous materials apd waste is apd throw{A Saa Berpardiep County. ES-11 Polititl/Actions P/A-IO-1 -Because safe tnosportation of hazardous waste is an important goal of uisting state law and total jurisdictions, sDccificd hazardous waste (aeilities shall use routes that can safely accommodate additiooai truck traffic, do not pass through residential areas, and uu intestate or state divided highways as major routes. P/A-10-2 Bscaux local jariedictiens can have a role in the ssfe transportttioo of haurdoua waste, this jurisdiction shall establish a task force whoa purpose is to develop proposals for apecifyiag routs for hazardous wore tnoslsort, identifying limitations for scheduling times of day v.nA days of the week, types of wastes that can bt transported, and the need for ootificstion requirements. Also, the task Corce shall further assess the routes of concern (Highways Sg, 62, 71, and I-IS). The task force should be eompoud of members of the public, City, County, and regional transportation planners, emergency rgpoex personnel, and industry with expertise in transportation of hazerdous substances. P/A-10-3 Because specified hazardous waste facilities must have access to sett transportation routes, this jurisdiction shall require aDDlicants for specified hazardous waste facilities to fund an analysis of transportation concerns (see policy action P/A-S- 1(6Hd) Chapter 3). The [ransporntion uudy shall provide a descriptiao and andysia of the projected volumes of hazardous waste transported into and through the County. The •...,..,...•.•:.,. •..t. r,..... :w..•:r:.w ....r...a.•:.... eu ,nom shall-DarticiDate with loeol government staff io developing the scope of the study. The uudy shall include, but not be limited to: • An identification of all reasonably available highway and railway routes in the Southern California region and the development and comparixn of the risk associarcd with the alternue routes; • A wmpadson of the risk auociated with transporting hazardous waste io different truck and nil cargo tanks; • An ideotifintioa oP route-specific, risk•raducing meuures for each route examined; and ° Ae jdenttficatioa sod evaluation of proctdu::l (:., training, routing, curfews), techaologinl (i.e., equipment ianowtion), and extend risk-reducing meaagras (i.e., road improvements, emergency respodu improvements) to transport huardoua wore by truck aed by rail. P/A•10.1 Becaax Dladning for ufe transportation of hazardous waste is a regional codcerD, this jurisdiction shall work with regional ES-12 Iranaportatioo Dlaaners in ensuring thst local issues are addressed in regional transportation pleas. P/A-10-5 Bemuse state highways are used to transport hazardous wastes through the County and it is necessary to maintain highways in good condition, this jnrisdietion shall participate with regional, state, and federal governments in determining priorities for funding and repair of highways in the County. P/A-10-6 Because transport of 6ezardoua wane on local roads has sot been considered, thin jnrisdietion rshalt study and develop transportation and routing plans for the tnmport of hazardous wastes within urMa areas. P/AJOJ Because knowledge about safe transportation of hazardous wane as well a state and federal transportation regulations is important for proper management of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall continue its education program for hazardous waste generators. The program shall include information on proper labeling, placardieg, and manifesting requirements. P/A-10-g Because transportation of hazardous materiels is to important issue that needs further consideration, and because current plans do not address the tnnsporration of Mztrdow materiels and these meterida arc transported through the County on a regular basis, this jurisdiction shall require the task force identified in Policy P/A•IO-2 w consider transportation of hazardous materiels iaues as well a thou of hazardous waste. ESd3 CHAPTER 11 ENFORCEMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE Enforctmcnt and emergency responx are two critical elements necessary for the effective management of haurdoua waste and materials. The County's enforcement Drogrero ensures eompliance with hazardous material/waste regulations by conducting both investigation and, possibly, litigation of potential violations. The emergency response program, on [he other hand, consists of an emergency rcaponx team compoxd oC active trained personnel and a model emergency respoox plan (Area Plan) that identifies the resources and responsible agencies in the event of an emergency. Thest programs are critical because they ensure compliance with hazardous material/waste rtgulations and the local jurisdiction's prepartdness in the event of •o accidentel spill or rNease. Also, important to proper management of hazardous material/waste are inspection and monitoring efforts. These issues are discussed in Chapters 6 and 7. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goaln G-11.1 To ensure the safe management of hazardous substances within San Beroardieo Count'. G-II-~ To continue providing a comprehensive response to emergency situations in order to protect public health and safety end the environment. 11.42 Policies/Actions P/A-11.1 Because consistent, periodic inspections of hazardous waste generators in the County ensures compliance with hazardous material/wastt regulations, the County shpt) continue to conduct a hazardous waste generator and hazardous material handier inspection program. The program shall emphasize education and technicel asaisnnce to haurdow materiel handler and hazardous waste {eneraton regarding regulatory requirements and waste minimization. Every effort shall be made to implement this program io all vcu of the County. P/A-11-.2 Becaux impaction and enforcement efforts are conducted by several different egeneies end a eombine4 enforoement Deogram may ensure contioueA compliance by busioesxa in the County, the County shall continue to coordinate enforcement efforts with the State Department of Health Services, the Regional Water Quelity Control Gouda, the Air Quality hLnagement Dittrich, and other federal, sate, and local agencies. P/A-11.3 Becauu enforcement efforts provide a mechanism for ensuring compliance with hazardous material/waste regulations, the ES-M County shalt continue to fund the coforcement program through permit tees. P/A-11.4 Becaax emergency respoox 6rocedures involve xverai different agencies, the County shall develop an on-going awareness program that informs the police, fire, and other agencies about the procedures and responsibilities specified in the Hazardous Materials Reepoax Area Ptan. P/A-II-S B'yux the County 6ae significant expertix is coordinating response to caergeaeie, the County shall continue to be :hc coordinating agency for the Iotengeocy Repoax Team. P/A-Il-6 Becaux responu to ae emergency requires tniaed, experieeced personnel, the Iotengency Reepoax Team ahdl continue its advanced responx capability training. ES-IS CHAPTER 12 SITE MITIGATION AND LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION The prevalence of hazardous materials and products has been widesDrea6 throughout the County and cities, es these products are commonly used in our society. The Consumer Remand for these mamrials requires that businesses handling hazardous materials and gmenting hazardous waste be located in tvery jurisdiction. Such materials and wastes have been produced and handled for many ytara, and iccidental releases of these materials have treated a multitude of contaminated sites. The most common threat associated with thex sites is tht potential movement of hazardous contaminants through the land to weer supplies, particularly groundwater aquilen. Other problems associated with contaminated sits include: toxic emissions, improper land ux in areas on or surrounding contaminated sites, and short or long term risk to public health and safety. Several federal, state, and local programs have been developed to identify, characterize, and ultimately mitigate contamination and potential negative impacts at these sites. These programs have resulted in several lists which identify sites targeted by each program, These tuts often duplitatt each other, although considerable differences occur among the lists. While data are being compiled on these sites, they are incomplete because there are difficulties in tracing boundaries of oDCrstion, finding responsible parties, and fully assessing the extent of rise potencies! contamination. The available data ^re maintained by many xpuate agencies, and risk determinations and mitigation methodologies are not yet completed for mos[ of these sites. In addition, these liars may chance es dv. _ dicrnvrr.A _.•~~ ~ wiuaa wu. The objectives of some of these programs and their resulhsnt site lists are to ensure that jurisdictions are aware of these sites, that timely and complete cleanup occurs, and that proper impact review is conducted as a part of the development/land use review process. When data ov hazardous waste generation projected from cleauup efforts are made available by the responsible agency, it will be included in the data analysis section in future revisions of this Plav. However, mast sites have not yet Deen evaluated by the rerpootibte agency. GOALS AND POLfCIESJACTIONS The following goals and policies/actions addrea the need to coordinate activities related to site mitigation and loeg ttrm remedial acrlon. Goals G•12.1 To ensure that t II jurirdietionr are aware of all identified contaminated ricer within San Bernardino County. G•12.2 7o aurora that timely and complete cleauup occurr at contaminated rites. ES•e6 G12-3 To enure that environmental review is conducted for projects proposed on sites which have been identified ss cootaminated. Politic/AMiom P/A•12-I Because current information on the location and status of cleanup of coonmieated sites is of vital importance for development in the County, coil bequse the Office of Planning ^od Research (OPR) Liat is not frequently updated nor does it provide details as to the connmiea[ian or status of cleanup, this jurisdiction shall develop a cootaminated sites data base that 6rovides geographical, physical, and Iced ux ehaneteriatics for use by applicants coil industry. Io addition, the County Departmeet of Environmeo[al Health Services (DEHS) shall update the OPR lift on • periodic basis and Drovide a DEHS updated list to etch jurisdiction. The DENS updated list shall also be uxd by this jurisdiction to asairt in identifying contamipated sites associated wi[h land use applications. During DENS preparation of an updated list, the following may be included: a) information op site contamination and its applicability to different types oC development to assist cities and applicants, b) information regarding the current cleanup statue of eoetamioated sites, and e} addition of sites to eke OPR list. When DEHS propous to add a site to the OPR fist, DEHS shall L,: ,,,,,::y one owner in wnaag. Anuytial evidence shall be required before a site is listed. The owner shall have IS days from the date of this police to make a written request for a Administrative Hnriog regarding the proposed listing. When requested, a hearing shall be held prior to liatipg a site as contaminated. P/A•12.2 Becauu cleanup of contaminated sites is a complex task which involves multiple agencies, DEHS shall monitor and work eoopentively with all geeeia involved in site aneament and remediatioe. DENS shall coesider develoDieg a Memorandum of Undentagdieg with state ^od regional agencies to Drovide auistaace and oversight of monitoring, uaeameat and/or remediatioe activities. Pi A•i2-3 Beca Yie the method Of femediatioe pe Catlx Impaeta, the County aed cities in cohjuectioe with the State Department of Health Services shill encourge omits treatment aed remediation to reduce the transport of haurdoua waste from contamipated sites, and should iospre appropriate remediatiopa are completed to Drovide permanent remedies. ES•17 P/A-l2.4 Becauu site remediatioo activities require coordination and expertiu, DEHS shell implement a site assessment and remediation Drogrsm and develop a program to enhance training of personnel in site assessment and mitigation techniques, and risk assessment techniques. P/A-12-3 Hecaux site assessmept and remediatign crests costs to the local agepeiea, the County should investigate loading possibilities Cor cleanup activities This should confider how local agencies can recover foil or partial payment from responsible parties for cleanup of contaminated sites, redoes the duDliution of effort among all agencies, and minimize the cost of work. The County and cities should auDPOrt legislation that defines the responsible party in regard to the assessment and cleanup of contaminated sires, a well as legislation tbat improves access to state and federal SuDerfundt to cleanup orphan sites. DEHS should seek state funding for updergroupd storage tank remediation programs. P/A-12.6 Became state law does not specify local actions or procedures for projecn proposed at • location listed by the Office of Planning and Reuarch (OPR) as ^ cootamipated site, and impacts may result to the public health snd safety, and because development on contaminated sites may preclude future environmental remediatiou this jurisdiction shall amend the DeveloDmeot Codt to implement the following as ^ part of the development review and permit issuance process: •) require a prnpplication meeting for all development/land ex ayyiit,uiuua et iucuiuua ilaKll iry VCR or Ylt1J. b) require ail develoDmept/land use applications at locations listed by OPR or DENS to be subject to discretionary conditioeal use review of this jurisdiction, except when deemed not necessary by this jurisdiction. Exemption from discretionary review shall be bawd on the scope of she project end the aature of the contamination. P/A-12-7 Becauu this jurisdiction has a concern with proper cleanup and funding for eleauuD of contaminated rites, this jurisdiction shall do the following: a) RecommeeA, by resolutiop, to federal legislative reDreseotativa that legirlation be developed to require Detrartmeai of Lei core to ipciude rite cieauup apd to set ulde mousy for eleaau0 (at Drerept cost) a Dart of bare closure plops, apd b) Require that ^ clan-up Dlap which ipcludes the source of loading be submitted to DEHS far review and approval before new or alterpnive land uses are updertaken. ES-4g CHAPTER 13 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND PARTICIPATION An effective public participation Drogram depends on early anu continued plamiog to generate input from a broad crony section of the population and the regulated community. The overall public participation Drogram for the CHWMP ^ilowed for public input on concerns and priorities; suggestions for alternativts and acw strategics; and review and assessmen! of proposed musures. An effort was made Qo inform ^nd encourage participation from the general public, civic, environmental and business organizations, the cities and ageaeiea withie the County, and the regulated community. Also, the services of a public partieipat:oe coordinator were secured to assist department staff in implementing • public involvement program. An entry effort was made to get input by early November to meet the December 31, 1967, Draft Plan deadline. Preparation of the final CHWtrB repaired additiood public involvement efforts. The CHWMP public participation program consisted of the following elements: - on-going advisory committee input - distribution of newsletters - distribution of an informative brochure - a series of Dublie workshoDa - a speakers bureau and slide Drosentstion - media coverage • distribution of 3000 copies of the draft plan summary and about 750 copies of the Draft CHWMP - a series of pubic hearing on the Draft CHWMP Successful implementation of the CHWMP will depend on Continuing public education on the importance of proper haurdotn waste management. Continued efforts in this area will need to focus on public involvement in the implementatiaa of the programs specified in the CHWMP end on public DarticiDation in the review of proposals for specified hazardous waste facilities. t;rOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Public participation should take plane throughout the implementation of the CHWMP pro{nima a well as when aDPlieationa for specified hazardous waste facilities era received. The followia{ {owls and policies/actions ensure continued efforts io involvio{ the public. Gwia G•13•I To continue public Dartieipatioa and public education in the imDlemeatatioa of the pro{rams identified is the County Huudous Wgte Maasgement Pba. G•13-2 To include public idvolvemeol in the review of applications for specified hazardom wgte facilities. ES-~9 Policies/AMioas P/A-13.1 Beaune public DarticiDation and education is important for the preparation and review of the CHWh~, the County shall establish an ao-going Haurdous Wastc bLnagement Advisory Committee to review reports oo implemee:atioe oC the Dlan, to consider new Drogram directions, to guide a continued Dublic education Drognm, tod to assist in revising and updating the Haurdous waste Maoagemmt Plae. P/A-134 Becaux state law requires the formation of a Loal Asxssment Committee (LAC) within 90 days after «cciving ae NOI, this jurisdictioe shall establish by ordieaace policies tad procedures for the formation of the Committee, the selection of members, sad the role of the LAC ie regard to other deeisioo-making bodies. ES-30 CHAPTER !1 IINPI.EMEWTATiOH OF CICF'IA' PROGRAMS The CHWMP recommends uvenl prognata which addreu the County's goals regarding e(teetiva hazardous waste management. Ia order to achieve these goals, reasonable efforu mast be made to imDiemeo[ CIIWMP programs. tmDlementnion depends on the cnblishment aC program Driorities, the identification of funding sources, and the developmem of a xhedule for implementation. r The Drograms recommended io this Pian were uparattd into three categoric Cor implementation: immediate, first year, and second year implementation. The nlegoric reDreuat both the priority Car implementation and the Dropoud imDlemeotatton xhedule, The programs placed in the immediate category reflect those programs that Drovide the needed foundation Cor future County Drograms; they are the highest priority programs. Programs Dlaced ie the Cirst and second year implcmentation category arc dso importao[ but can be delayed because of concerns with fuodiog or becauu issum related ro rhea Drograms have been addresxd by programs identified io the immtdiate category. The priorities may change, However, based on the availability of funding, changes in local attitudes, and the recognition of sew conditions. Some programs like the ordinance amendments may 6e implemented aii at once it staff and fuoding sources exist. The attached hbta summarises ehe information regarding implementation o! the recommended Drognms. Tha imDlemeabtion schrAnle, reaponsibtt agencits, resource Deeds, and poteatiai fuodiog sonreet have ail lxea identifies, inc ..::;c.:y ^f the oroarams viii bE funded by permit iota Some o[ the Drograuu are one•timt (i.e., orataaaK :y.~ ~±~ntsl efforb that coo bt abaorbcd into oo•going County projects others like the transportation studies require the identification of fuoding sources. The table preaenb the County9 best climate o[ potential funding sources. Es-s i 4 1+ 9 ~ ,~ H .~ y~ Y rl } w M~i -pi39N Y MY a l D E4~ Y3.1± ~ C~ ~' ..j} yy~04 N 0. a ;~~4gN +M i.pi ~m 4n {M pI~~P OypYYw ~S~ C•.d p ~~~pY •+~~~ Y9 30• P zatu-a Y; ~i Pei wF 0.M .i4 • ~ O • NN@Y ~. p~ OC i 4tlC yCCC .+ Y 06~ 456Vi0 ~O dC dCS~ Y4i)~1 .i GS Y .01SpO aSYF~g2; 9B3 $ ~g$8 u yI~ML;~ YT~ A pNM• i JJ1I t $ 44 s jj py uS.C. ~O F ~ dY4p~C b0~ N aF~i a 5 3 w i ~4 ~ ~ O A F Y pp a C 4 O H S M S 4 Q R S~ p~ ~ C •~Y Y ~~ ~~ ~~ ~x Y.1 ~ 3 = :. ~' ~ ~ p ~ as ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ Y~ °~~~ a ss~ ~ ~yy~~ ~' s ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~s ~ R ~~ ~~aE ~4 ~5s"s$ ~s ~ ~ ~ Aag 3 " .. 6 ., G -ii O ~ i M O a y a y •• ~IC~.. ~C60 i Y i 6111111iiiiii y Y 4 fl ~ i F OQi+ VV YPr~~y>~i0 4 M MMi• V i O Y - 09 O>VppNyyMi4 Y ~~1~COi~ C Y N yyyyyy ~ ? ~ M M i .'~ UiCiEi410Y •0 YMO i~YCY YiYYOC q .~jjv~~~~4 C6 tSL ,~ a a € y. >Vi p ~ '~M~Y y y0~ y 6> oo W W q• :>S ~g o>3~ Y a. a O LE 4 V... V~ N • Y SSS ~ gia :5 y: Y4 ., ~~~~ S a~ ~ o Ea w u i i w o ~ u i u ~" ~ 1a 41 '~U O O O Y O V O V ~ O g.s gssC ~~s f+ ~ •6 ~ ( ~ " • ~ •o ~ _ ^ ~ M M NM s ;s ! iq~ v ~ y YiY ~' ~~" Y Y~I ~ o~ ~ sS~s Cp ~1 ~~ YC ~~IM O Y OY~ Y Y I ~ ~4 YY O~IM p Y j ~' G ~ ~ M1~ J `~ ~ 3 ~ E sg ~ ~ ~ ~ y " ~ g: b '~ ~ ~ Y ~,~ E C ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a a 3 ~ Y-1 " ~ ~ pa ~g ~~~ + 9`~ ~ Y 0 11 4 • d ~ ~ ~~ ^ + i" M E~ ~P O" ~E q 1~p 2 g m y w w H y Y a ~ a H Y 4 Y i O O G Y Y Y •• ~+ ii t+fW VW V4 Y •~ L °ei Mw y 4> O+Yn +O'i pY~ O OyOr4 Y>YY~~O YQY~ •00 4+0p6 V)~~ 9M~ IYIO4~G ~OV4 Y~Y ~•/•Y/ yp S+O 4+/yG ~yOG: Y+~Y p +06U YM•Y^ Yny ~`h y0 N•yC9 y•N S-' ++iyvyua 6 OrA7 4KI9 UOY M~.(/y 61 ~ p Y 0 M •Y2 M 0 4GR N Hs n•IN tl 9 ay y y ~~ 08~ O~V D ~ O C Y~ M O M y M ~ .1 Y b~ X~ +~ a.~ :~ ~? .~ yGy Py • Ew F: ~ 3 ~a ~~ ~ i SIC M H .~ 06 ~Y ~•/ ~p~/uU ~~ a~ s~ ~a ~ ~:~ a~3 :•: aass ~ _ 9 i _~~ ~. +o• 4 N a A COa m i O +OI O ~C ~ fm W i YCti y M ~i U.1 0 -,gyp N • C O ~ C •H 4 i i •F 6CO „~ y b~M 0. y i09 O GY p, S4 M tl i y '~ 60 Y + O y~ ~ - ~ 4~ ` F4 " ~ F6 M Y 0• 4 M • '~ 6> PG/ a 4 94,y MY9 9 ~~ L{ i~~ 0 ~ i CYY G•U OY ~ Y~4 y~ MY o60~Y ~YNO ~ YQO+S tl 9OWX N ~ M y V u 4Y.1 V 6Nf 4 4 YY ~ iO~Y Yl~4 •~O •0003^ u O q N~M• E 0 •Y YYYO O YJ pyp M~\~ tl~ MY N • i 9 ; OHN O4~ uuy~y~{a O tl W a W y o a u i ^~ O e 4 w Y 4 0 M cc 4 y~ 4 O ~` O gM~ S.J $;~ Y; +~ Y g„5 ~ '' w ~~ J `g D ~ap p yM} ~ Y w.• yN y ~ d u y "3 4 MN 4O Y y Q7y.S 8 4 4 Yy0 " 33s aE4~ 3 N~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ nl " ~y ~ Y 06 p ~ i ~ag~ a~ ~~ ~~ yyqqf. " ~ ~ 4 « S a~w ~ ~~ M6 M OY S ~ ~Y pY EE• / y>>~iMf AQQ/ itl0 ~ 04~M a E~ 40Y 4 tl~gttio ~,S A ~ •/" 4 .~iJ •Y ..~j p.~ Asa ~ a° " na: " ~ ~~~ aas w M 9 ~ fl 4 ~ • 1 G ~ .~i Ipn iH S ]Ca Y • • R b~Y E /•• •> y O S4 ~ as s a :~ Fy N w F iS Y ?1 M . OC 1 y `YEb3 O4Y qT •V $,SSw C~wFYwEO ONq • 6/OCw4• 60S••OY M C.Y~v ~ /.,, sa a~Ys / s~~~~;. ~~~s~a~s ossao~s '' b6a Y YU • byw•M M Y/ 4 CCM• p• d S~ ~/6M+ Cp 4 19 S• p~/L O •r• • ppO •C(: ONpUyS p 0 i i410~• y~•C •>•eYe4>>•Y •$•y/•5y •1~ $ S O 1 • .•1 C O./i ~ Oq Ny GGr ..•i 41MMgyyq• ll yyOONYOqqC ti40pppp'y$$$Ygyy•11 ~~11 p667SA 00FS/•,/. OF /~•GOpU PIM ^ byy S ,C wC ~,±a ~$:! IC /• Y• w 1~ •//C '~~ g ?o~? 3ao g°~ ~~ o ~Hda$ u.~u c E O C it G C 4 M M w 4 w 4 C Y O ~ i i Y/ yY~ M 5 g~~ „7 EiG E:a M / • d •1 YM 6MM •N Y 1•~ y C / ~ ~ L • Y of ap ++ii u y •^J ~ ~~ e F: Gppp 1 yq y •1 M + 0. 9 .w4 Mph N ~ M ~ •1 •.~ 1~.M1 •• • C M ~ 4 ' C Uy 1YYq~ ~• 4 E• 4 ~ -1; •.~Jgg g EE G e w w $ p d Y MY 1AN MN n91M ~y}14 N p11 •• • t M ~~ Mw6 n•3 •~yw :• r b 14 M 4 111 ~ • ~ iN~_Y N w N4E ~ gM • • e > i o K ~ ° • .°. e • 0 4 4~ O C L f \e •1r~ p ~ pY . p 40 ^,,~/64 4~ a d 0 p Ce F Y y y e p U OC M° ey 4 / j4 • Op O• M. V = w 460 e•-~SP.~•O> 06 • 4>VY La •.~U~' ~ C • yC y YDY 4`YF\ee 4 A Y •••O •..ec e• >•a •• « S4 >l1~•M • •• • rii Y U4.y ~ a `~09M4tl M iU y.y € ~ S •< g~ I ~~ ~U eG Y C OYOtlY> Y >M eq V CC M N• b~ y ~eO OY .cii aM6~ua~ u• •. /w e •. i °aw~eU « ~e~ ~ gs :;s>as ~~ 9Ga S pCy 9Y CI V /~ 4 •° Ya . 04 tiU• F ~ M O Mtl• Q ) 01Yi Y•4 QN+ a „~ i ,«. a p ~ ~ ggu i7 u 3 O F Y C w O 4 C 0 4 4 0 4 4 O V C C G ~ a qY~ G•« 4 = «• Y M • « p Y e „ ~ F F py ~ « M «Mp^ AM y ~ y M ~ ^ tiQ 3 ~ w ~ Q y „ M „ « 2 ~6g M ~ ~ ,4 « a~a:s • s a ~ s 3s S ' I ~' ~~~~a MM ^^ C• M Y ~ • ~ : g~8'~ ~ ~~ OO $ ~$ $~( S IE~1~ 9 P C ~« y a° y M V ~~ p 3 7~ 7 ~M N ° SD.. £, ~~ :aa~;c ay ~; s 3~ ~; ~?~ « « 3: ss .;~ 9 9 h fY s s •6g a f ~ Y 1 V 0. S Z ~ ? ~ gi " g N Y•M ti p M•O d M 0 d 0. SYd 4 w y Y Y YYVp • ~JV OY OY dYtiJ S •d ~I~~U ~ YM y~ qq 0•M•MY20 •9 .~IrO• ••YMYO U t ~~ o CC ~ d ~~CCOy O d V ~ g a 9 0.~.8~ o 0 •M y 4V at y X q Y CY ~M> ~ yC. ~~ O 9 x N' GV + J 1 f O V~ V M1 R O M M 4 O .1 4 4 O M w pi i ~ i C 8 ~4 8~"< ~ ~yy ~ i ^ 4i^^o M ~M NM y~ 4 O °~ O ri 3 " ~ w• •~ ~ ~ ~ s a ~ ~ Y nr 9 9 ~G ~ • tiE C0 ~ O~~ ~ • ~~~. s . ass ~ ~ ~a~ ~a~ ~ 33s ~ ~g~ • N LLN ~YQ y M • V =~QGMY ~E~~Y 3 ~ya~s~ a s~> ~~s .. ~ga$'• ,a;~~ .~ ~~~48~ aD N W cc' sic ~e=~ ~ aso~ cPU i co>si NflVPmhPr 6, 1990 I.iW OFF'.C ES RiC HARD G FANDERSON sm*E ~~ s+coNO=2. sou pirvc 1365 wE Si •00, rI LL pOVLCV<9o V Cl4N 0, CPL~FO RN.rl 91)06 City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 RE: Real Property Condemnation Our Client: Joan V. Aggazzotti APN 229-021-17 To: The Clerk The Etonorable Members of the city Counsel Gentlemen: ~• -ELEPNONE G49 222! rix Jim-9B3-)53~ ~~' ~ 199a ~~~ v~ ~ ~il"~(~ ~ p1~~~~ .~:. "''r"-"' Please be advised that this office represents Joan V. Aggazzotti, the owner of the above described real property which is subject to your threat of condemnation described in your correspondence of October 17, 1990. The purpose of this letter is to formally advise you that Joan V. Aggazzotti does hereby protest any and all action taken or to be taken by the City of Rancho Cucamonga concerning the condemnation and taking of the real property belonging to our client. We would request that this letter be distFi~ted t¢~all of/t e members of the Counsel prior to your hey r of N embe5~%7,1990 whe r<:in the Counsel proposes to adopt,9 Resolu~i for. pmigent Domain against our client's property: j ~ Very truly yosxr ~. % LAW OFFICE,~F ERBON!8 RST 1 ,'/ , i ~~~~~ ~ '~ RICH R ~ APIB£RSO `~~-~^ RGA:tam cc: Client