No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/05/03 - Agenda Packet • -- ~, CITY COUNCIL i A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA j I REGULAR MEETINGS (st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:30 p.m. May 3, 1989 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga ..• City Couucilmembera Dennis L. Stout, Arayvr Pamela ]. Wright, CounrlrnnrlDrr Deborah N. Brown, Moyor Pro rr,n Charles J. Bugaet, CornrllmenrDrr William 7. Alexander, corxumrTer. •~• Jack Lam, crn Manor.. James L. Markman, Ctry Axarnry Beverly A. Authelet, arr ctrnt City Office: 989-1651 Liom Park: 960.3145 PAGE ~~~r.~ City Council Agenda Hay 3, 1989 1 All itpa atlbesitted for the Citp Camcil agenda ausL H is writing. Tae desadlines for tubaittiag Lheae itua la 5:00 p.a. oa thes Nesdneadap prior to Lhe waling. 1Te Citp CLrk' a offiw reeelvea all anth itpa. a. CALL TO OADBR 1. Pledge of allegiance to Flag. 2. Aoll Cell: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stcut _, Brown _, and Wright _. 8. ANNOONCpeSNtB/PRSSRPTaTIONB No Items 5ugnitied. C. CONBEN2 CaLdtIDAR Thes following Conant Glaadat iteu are axpesciesd to W routine a~ aoa-controvaralal. Thep Mill De aeLesd npoa by the Council at one tW without diacuaaion. anp i!e up be raanvesd by a Comeilaesabar or wbesr of Lhe audiences for diacuetim. 1. ADD[oval of MinuT.wae Marrh 15. tOR0 2. Approval of Wnrrante, Register No'e 4-19-89 and 4-26-89 I 1 and Payroll ending 4-20-89 for the total amount of $1,927,463.34. 3. Approval to receive and file currant Investment Schedule 12 ae of April 26, 1989. d. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Snle Beer 6 Wine Z~ Bating Place for Rocky's New York Style Pizzeria, Bader P. and Lilly M. Rhan, 9615 Foothill Boulevard. 5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer S Wine Qz Sating Place for Taco Patiory, Raquel Quillen, 9799-a Base Line Road. ,-r_;~ . - Y~.,-,..~;,. City Council Agenda Hay 3, 1989 PAGE 6. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice 24 Inviting Bide" for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project at the Iatereectian of Baee Line Rond and Ramona Avenue (Account No. 12-4637-8826), Base Line Road and ValencLa Avenue (ACCOUni No. 12-4637- 8827) and Haven Avenue and Viciorie Street (Account No. 12-4637-8832) to be funded by TDA Article 8 Fund. RESOLUTION NO. 89-188 25 A RESOLUTION OP TAE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF IUNC110 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPBCIPICATIONS FOA TRH "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING" IMPROVEMENT PR038CT AT TAH INTEASHCTIONS OF BASE LINE ROAD AND RAMONA AVENUE, BASE LIMB ROAD AND VALENCIA AVENUE, AND HAVEN AVHNOB AND VICTORIA STREET, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIEING AND DIRECTING TIIH CITY CLEAR TO ADVERTISE AND AECBIVB BIDS 7. Approval io authorize ehs advsrtisLng of "Notice Lnvitinq 29 elds" for the 93urry Ssal Program 1988-89 Phass I, various Street locations, Improvement Project, to bs funded from Cen Tax 2107 Acct 09-4637-8816. RESOLVTION NO. 89-189 3Q OP RANCHO ^CVCAMONCA," CALIFORNIA, pAPPROVING PLANS AND BPECIFICATION9 POA THE "SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM 1988-89 PHABB I, VARIOUS STREETS", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORS E:NG ANO DIRECTING TNH CLTY CLERH TO AVVEATISE TO RECEIVE BIDS B. Approval to authorize the advertising of "Notice Inviting 34 Bide" for the Improvement of Peron Houlevard, from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, to be Landed fr0111 CDBG Punde 28-4333-8194. RESOLUTION NO. 89-190 35 A RESOLUTION OB THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONCA, CALZPORNIA, AFFROVIIIC PLANS AND 5P8CIPICATION9 FOR TN8 "IMPROVEMENT OF PERON BOULEVARD PROM AAMONA AVENUE TO HERHOSA AVENUE", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORISING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLSRE TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS ~ ~Al w,- ~~~~+~ city Council Agenda Nay 3, 1989 PAGE 3 9. Approval to exacuie a Profeeaional Servlcee Agreement ( W 39 89-072) with J.P. Davldaon and Aeaociatee, to prepare Landscape Improvement and Rsnovat ion Plana for the east aide parkway of Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard Lo Base Line Road for a fee not to exceed $17,270.00 to be funded from Lhe Beautification Pund, Account No. 21- 4647-8722. 40 30. Approval to execute a Profeeaional Servlcee Agreement (CO 89-073) with Don Greek and Aeaociatee to prepare design plane, epeclticatione end eatimstea for the re-opening of Highland Avenue beiwean Haven Avsnua end San Benito Avenue with a connection between Highland Avenue and 19th Street at Ben Bonito Avenue, and providing three lanes of traftic each direction with a t®parary medinn island on Haven Avsnve between 19th Street and Pighland Avenue, for a fas not to exceed $23,632.00 to be funded from the System Developagnt Pund, Account No. 22-4637-8852. 11• Approval to execute a lases renewal (CO 89-074) with the 49 state of California, Depnrtmant of Trmaportation, for property on the went aide of Beryl Street between 19th end 20th streets, Parcel 6223-001-05. 12. Approvnl to execute a contract (CO 89-075) for the ease SU I Line Road Parkway Bseut iflcailon Improvement Pro]ect [rom the Naat city Limlts io Grnslf.an StrNG awarded to Gateway Construction. Incornnratn.i; f,.. th. •„ _,_ p - $103,124.00 ($93,749.00 plus l0a contingency) to bo tunded free Beautification Pund Account No. 23-4647-8793. 13. Approval to execute contract agreement (CO 89-076) with 51 the County of sen Bernardino for participation in the Sheriff Department •e Nork Raleaae Program. Contract administration fee of $100.00 to be pall from Account No. 01-6647-6028. 14. Approval to execute Summary Vecailon of a Landscape 52 Maintenance Access Paaement - a request to vecaL a landscape maintenance easement between FNfeaton court and the Souther Pacific Railroad's sight-of-way, located west of Milliken Avenue and north of Baee Line - APN 202- 841-38 M-'t , ~~~~'~ City Council Agenda May 3, 1989 PAGE 4 RESOLUTION NO. 89-191 53 A AHSOLUTION OF TFI6 CITY COUNCIL OP TXE CITY 08 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO SUMMARILY VACATH A LANDSCAPH MAINTENANCB ACCHSS EASEMENT BBTWHBN WNEATON COURT AND THE SOUTHBRN PACI F'lC RAILROAD'S RIGRT-OP-WAY 15. Approval to award Lhe Carnelian 9treat, Eaet Side Parkway 56 Beauiificeiicn Improvement Project, from Vineyard Avenue to Base Line Road to Gateway Construction for the amount of $98,661.00, to ba funded with Beautification Funds Account No. 21-4647-8046. 16. Approval to award the Aed Nill Park Drainage Improvement 59 Project to Harris Construction for the amount of $181,914.30, to be funded with Capital Reserve Punde - ACCOUnt No. 25-4285-7043. 17. Approval to award the Avenida Vej er Improvement Project, 61 from Grove Avenue to Sierra Madre Avenue to Vnnee Corporation for the amount of $158,253.65, to W [unded with Lvac funds - Account No. 28-4333-8811. 18. Approval of Map, execution of Zmpravemant Agreement, 64 Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Lnndecape Maintenance Districk No. 1 end Street Lighting Maintenance District NOS• 1 and 2 Eor Tract 12420. located at the northwest corner of 6th 8tre9t and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Jenel Dovelopmant, Incorporated. 65 RESOLUTION NO. 89-392 A ABSOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMHNT, IMPROVHMHNT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACE NO. 12420 RESOLUTION NO. 89-193 66 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CV^_?3fONGA, CALIFORNIA, OADERINO THE ANNB%AT ION OF CHRTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCH DISTRICT NO. 1 AND 9TREST LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT laa2D -,, _ .. , -., PAGE ~ ~ city CauncYl Agends ~~~+ Mn 3, 1989 5 19. Approval to a:acute Improvement Security Aidere fot Tract 69 132'73 located on the southeast corner Of Milliken Avenue and Hounteln Vlew Drive, submitted Dy Lewis Homes of California. RESOLUTION NO. 89-194 ~~ A RHSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TNH CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVB!ffiRT SBCVAITY RIDERS FOA TRACT NO. 13273 20. Approval to accept Improvements, Releeee of Bonds and NoticO Of Complat ion for: PaYCel Mno 7441 located on th0 north aide Of Lomi[a Drive 72 between Hellman Avenue and_AlMthvet Avenue Faithful Performanc0 Bond (Street) $ 5,800.00 73 ABSOLUTION NO. 89-195 A RESOLUTION OP TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTINC TNB PUBLIC INPROV61fENT3 POR PARCBL MAP 7441 AND AUTHORI LINO TH8 PILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR THB WOAR V.S. Poet Off LCe locAied on the northwest corner of Arrow ]Q Hiahwav and tihita Onk Avenue Faithful Performance Bond (Street) S 34,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-196 )5 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THB PUBLIC IMPAOVEMBNTB POR THB U. 9. POST OFFICE AND AUTHORISING THH BZLINO OP A NOTICE OP COMPLHTION FOR TH8 WORE 21. Approval to accept Improvements, release of Malntenance 76 Guarentww &md for Trse[ 12821 located On the south aide at Arrow Highway between Madrone Avenue and Baker Avenue. Malntenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 16,900.00 T'+~ i ` ' f r, ~~~~+~ City Council Agenda May 3, 1989 PAGE 6 12. Approval to accept for maintenance the Victoria Street J7 Rehabilitation, from 8tiwsnda Avenue to Enet Avenue, Contract No. 88-107, ae complete, release bonds and authorize LRe City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" RESOLUTION NO. 89-197 7$ A RESOLUTION OP TIffi CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA THE VICTORIA STREET REHABILITATION, PROM 6TIWANDA AVENVE TO BAST AVENGE, PROJECT ARO AUTHORISING TH8 PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLBTION POA THB WORE 23. Approval to accept for maintenance the Traffic Signal end 79 Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Highland Avenue and Archibald Avenue, Contsact No. 08-166, ae complete, relensa bonds and authorize the Ciiy Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion^. R890LVTION NO. 89-198 $0 A RHSOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNZA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVElDSNTB POR TRMPIC SIGNALS AND SAPRTY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION 08 ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND NTGNI.ANn AVINnP sun AUTHORIZING THE PILING OP A NOTICE OF COMPLETZON POR TIN: WORR 24. Approval to accept for maintenance the Improvement of $1 Grove Avemie nt 8th Street and Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Crossing, Contract No. 88-123, as complete, releaae Gonda and authorize the Clty Engineer io file n ^NOtice of Completion^. RESOLUTION NO. 89-199 $2 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB CITY OP'RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVEMHNTS POR 8TH STABET AND GROVE ALRNCE AT THfi A.T. b S. F. RATLROAb CROSSING IMPROVENSNTS AND AVTNORI2INC TH8 PILING OP A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOA THE NORR ~,aa.~ r-'.: .' :r:. ~~~~+ Clty Council Agenda May 3, 1989 PAGE 7 25. Approval of Revolution of Denial fo[ Tentatlw Tract 83 14218 - Nordic Development - Appeal of the Planning Coaroiaelon'e decision approving a residential subdivision and design review of 8 single family loth on 5.71 scree of land in the Hillside Residential District located north of Inspiration Drive and ea9i of Crestview Place - APN 200-441-23-28. Associated with the tract ie Tree Removal Petmii 89-08 requesting the removal of two (2( Sucalyptuv globuiue. RESOLUTION NO. 89-200 84 A ABSOLOTION OP TBB CITY COUNCIL OF TNH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIAr DENYING TENTATIVE TAACT MAP NO. 16218, A RHS IDHNTIAL SUBDIVISION ANO oHSIGN AEVIEM OP 8 SINGLB PAMILY LOTS ON 5.71 ACRBS OP LAND IN TH6 HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED NORTH OP INSPIRATION DAIVB ANO EAST OP CRLSTVIEW PLACH - APN 200-441-23-28. ASSOCIATED NITtl TH6 TRACT IS TRBB REMOVAL PERMIT 89-08 RBQUBSTING 1'E!B REMOVAL OF TWO (2( HVCALYPTUS GLOBULUS 26. Approval to accept detachment of Tzact Nov. 13748, 33857 87 and 13858 located north of Highland Avenue want of Milliken Avenue from Lsndecepe Naintenance Divtrict No. 1 end Street Lighting Mnintanance District No. z wod r~ sorter Trnet Non. 13748, 13757 and 13758 to Landvcapa Haintanence District No. 6 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and Betting the date of public hearing for June 7, 1989. RHSOLUTZON NO. 89-201 89 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, OP PRBLININAAY APPROVAL OF CITY BNOIN86R'S REPORTS POR ANNB%ATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 POR TRACT NOS. i 13748, 13857 AND 13755 , ! `=^i,. r . PAGE City Council Agenda Hay 3. 1959 8 ABSOLUTION NO. 89-202 ~ 99 A AHSOLOTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF TH8 CITY OP RANCHO CVCAHONGAr CALIPOANIAr APPROVING THB DBTACNMSNT OP TRACT N09. 137ABr 13857 AND 13858 PRON LANDSCAPH HAINTENANC6 DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STRBHT LIGRTING MAINTBNANC6 DISTRICT NO. 2 AND DHCLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDBR THB ANNEEATION TO LANDSCAPE NAINTBNANC6 DISTRICT NO. 6 AND STASBT LIGRTIN6 DISTRICT NO. 5; PURSUANT TO TNB LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 1972 AND OFPBRING A TIME AND PLACE POA HEARING OBJECTIONS THBR8T0 27. Approval t0 support Trae PreaervaL ion in the I-10 I 100 Corridor. ABSOLUTION No. 89-203 I 101 A ABSOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIPOANIA. SUPPORTING TRB GOALS OP T!R CITY OP PONTANA AND PABSSRVIN6 TNB TR8E9 ALONG THS I-10 CORRIDOR Thw in 11nv/nn nMl.. _ _ _ ....... -..- ~L~ ~.......c L...iuy. wi tun saN of first ruling. HacoadFraadiaga era arpaotad Lo M zoutiaa and aoa-coatro~asaial. That will M acted upon hP !ha Comeil at wa !iw Nilhout diaouoioa. Tba CSLY C]»rk will rand the title. AnY ito can ba rawFad for diaouasioa. No Items Submitted. The following itna ha~a bean adgrtiaad and/oe poatad u public huriaga a required by lac. The chair •ill opu the uatiag to raeaiva public lwtiiDaY. 5µ\: '. City Council Agenda Hay 3, 1989 PACs 1. APPROVAL OP SNVIAONMHNTAL INITI r Y. P T I I jQ2 AND ISSUANCB OP A NHGATIVS DECLARATION FOA THE 9TH STREHT IMPAOVBHENTS PAON CARNEiIAU STRHET TO WEST OP ANHTHYST STREET - Recommend that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting end approving the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the proposed 19th Street Improvements and issuance of a Negative Dacleration therefore end direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. RESOLUTION NO. 89-204 1~3 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP TFm' CITY OP RANCHO CVCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SNVIRONMSNTAL ASSBSSM@NT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE OECLAAATTON POR THE PROPOSHD 19TN STREET IMPROVEIffiNTS PROM CAANBLIAN 9TAEET TO WHET OP AMETHYST STREET 2. ENVTRONMBNTA_ AS BSSMENT AND FODTBII? BOL EVAR9 SPHCIFTC iSI PLAN AMENDlDiNT 89-02 - CITY OF AANCFIO CUCAHONCA - A request to chsnge the proposed location of the nortA lag of Aed Hill Country C1uD Drive, from that shown in the Foothill Spec if lc Plnn. The recomawnded plan 1• io reailgn Aed H111 Country Club Drive to epp[oxlmatsly 400 feat seer of the present intersection with Poothlll Boulevard, provide a niadien opening, antl inwran ~-.gfiC oiy.:a:.. iwuauonal al[ernntives that include a raised, curbed median on Foothill Boulevard Ln order to eliminate left Lurne into end out of Red Hill Country C1uD Dziva will be considered. RHSOLVTION NO. 59-305 158 A A69ULUTION oP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OF IUINCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPAOVINO HNVIAONMENT ASSHSSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN A!ffiNDMENT 89-OZ, AEQUESTINC TO CHANGE THB PROPOSBO LOCATION OP THE NORTH L66 OP THE AED HILL COUNTRY CLUB ORIVB AND O L H H LLS TAY UB' BRT P LY N'a COUN CL OPIV O A PROXIMATE 00 FRET EAST OP THH PRESENT INTERSECTION WITH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BASED UPON AN IN-DEPTH HNCINEBRING STUDY a r~+:.::: ` t . PAGE City Council Agenda May 3, 1989 10 R83oLUTION NO. 89-206 ~ 163 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING BNVIRONlOSNT ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPHCZFIC PLAN AMHNDMHNT 89-02, R84UESTIN6 TO CNANGB THB PROP098D LOCATION OP THE NORTH LBG OF THB RBD HILL COUNTRY CLUB DAIV6 AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHOIPN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY CONSTRUCTING A RAISED MEDIAN IN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SBTWEBN GROVE AVHNVE ANO SAN BEIWAADINO ROAD WITH RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE REMAINING AT ITS PRESENT LOCATION RESOLUTION NO. 89-207 ~ T6a A ABSOLUTION OP TNB CITY COUNCIL OP TH6 CITY OP R11NCN0 CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING 6NVIAONMHNT A39883NSNT AND FOOTHILL BOULBVARD SPHCIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02, REQUESTING TO CNANG6 THH PROP096D LOCATION OP TN8 NOATN LBG OP THE RBD MILL COUNTRY CLUB DAIVB AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHOWN IN THH SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE AEALZGNMBNT OP RHD HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO APPRO%IMATELY 400 FBHT MAST OF THB PABS&NT INTERSECTION KITH FMTwItT nntn otrwen - _____ ._............. ~. uau MBOIAN IN FOOTHILL 6OULEVARD BETNEEN GROVE AVHNU6 AND SAN BHANARDINO ROAD Tha followiag itwra Gave ao legal publlcatioa or poetiog raquirenwata. The Chair will opea the weaiiag to receive public tutianay. Ths following itwa do sot legally requires any public teetieooy, although Lhe Chair nap open tha necking for public input. 1. REPORT ON ITEMB BROUGHT UP BY BNR ^i: AT APRZ I EOZ 1989 ITY CO m ** N68TIN6 A. 9uggwated proiwct description should b• writiwn In a way that Se undantandablw Go homoownsr. ' J~ w _ ; PAGE city Council Agenda May 3, 1989 11 B. All commercial projects should be signed. C. Proposed that notices of public hearing should be addressed not only to homeowner name, but include "occupant". D. Felt carwaehee should be removed Erom neighborhood shopping centers. 2. CONPIRMING ULT IMATH BOUNDARIES OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 205 DISTRICT FOA AREA EAST OP -EER CREEA AND NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. 3. ANNEXATION 89-03 "INTENT TO ANNE%" - BLACi(MON HOMES, INC. ZO7 - A request to approve a etatem¢nt of Zntent ion to Annex a 25 acre portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN 225-152-01, 02, 03, and 04. AESOLVTION N0. 89-208 210 A RESOLUTION OF TII6 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANISATION ANO REQUESTING THB LOCAL AGENCY FOPHATION COMMISSION TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOA THE ANNEXATION OP PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE. REFER TO FILE, ANNEXATION 89-03 H. COUHCIL BVH2NES5 The following Steaa have been requaetad by the Citp Comcil for discussion. Thap ere oot public bearing iteas, although the Chsir asy open the eaating for public input. 1. ISCU O B O C O O G CO U ICATIONS P O PUBLIC" CLOSER TO THE PRONT OF AGENDA (BUquet) Mo staff report. 1. HEYUNT U A'BEMtlLY 'H C BADE L "IT' H O me HALFWAY HOU5HS (Wright) ~~ !~r G1 f^~ PAGE City Council Agend} Nay 3, 1989 12 ZZ$ RESOLUTION NO. 89-209 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TBE CITY OP AANCEIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING AS36N8LY BILL 1160 WHICH REHOUSE BOMBS THAT HOUSE WARDS OP THB COURT FAON THE HODY OP LAW THAT TOTALLY BLIMINATES A CITY'S JURISDICTION OVHR THE SITING OP SUCH BOMBS 3. N CAT O FPORTS WITH CALTRANS IN G 229 V NG PROC P LOCAL S ICTION P OJE (Wright) 4. CONS D R11 O OP ~L' FI P 20 DISTRICT I. I R 6 This is the ties for City Comcil to identify the itsa thy wish tv diacma ct the neat wetivg. Thew itsa hill not W Aiscuucd at this acting, only idcntificd for tDe next eeeting. J. CONMUNICATI0116 FROM TBE PUBLIC This is the ties anA place for tDe general public to aAdru• cue ~.icY wancii. auw iaw prvvaviw we my uomcu rroe addreaaivg avy iuua vet prnioualy includcd ov the Agenda. Tha Citp Council up revere teelieonp and act the uttcr for a aubaequent nccting. CorcnL• ^re to De 1Litsd to fire eivutaa per ivdiYidual. R. ADJ017RN1¢MT Ir Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Ranoho Cucamonga, hereby certify Chat a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 28, 1989, eevenGy-two (72) hours prior to the meetLnq per Government code 54953 nt 9320-C ease Line Road. MRSTINO 1'O ADJOURN TO CL086D 8686ION TO DIBCUeB LABOR ~ ~ ~ NSGOTIAT IONB. ~ n if ~~ n March 15, 19&9 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL HINUTES Regular Meeting A. CALL TO OADAA A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, March 15, 1989, in [Re LLon Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:50 p.m. Pzea¢nt wets Councilmember e: William J. Alexander, Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Oennie L. Stout. Also present were: City Manager, Jack Lam; Deputy City Attorney, Rfllph Hanson; city Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; City Engineer, Rueaell Maguire; Traffic Engineer, Paul Aougeau; Associate Planner, Scott Nuzphy; Aaeoctate Planner, Niki Bratt; Community Services Hanager, Joe Schultz. • x • • x S. ANNOUNCEIRNTS/PRESEMTATIONg B1. Proclamation presented to the Giil Seoute honoring Girl Scout Week March 12-18, 1989. 82. Presentation of Residential Recycling Checks to Sunrize Rotacy Club and Cub Scout FacK ibu! xor service :.iuuj wayauim Li.... ;.>.L:..:y...L L:y .:. ..... ~ ti'c Voluntary Residential Recycling Program. C. CONSPMT CALENDAR (Councilwoman Wright requested Item C11 to be pulled for discussion purposes) C1. Approval of Minutes: January 1H, 1989; February 1, 1989. C2. Approval of War rant e, Register No'a. 03/01/89 and 03/08/09 and Payroll ending 03/02/89 for the total amount of $2,692,014.70. c3. Approval to authorize entering Ln[o an agreement Icu n9-046) Eor financing of City equipment, which has been procured in accordance with Purchaaing procedure, with Aanc One Lcaainy Corpvraticn. RESOLUTION NO. E9-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AVTHORIZING THE LEASE/ PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT THROUGH BANC ONE LEASING CORPORATION City Council Minutes March 15, 1989 Page 2 C4. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for U.S. Poet Office, located on the corner of White Oak Street and Atrow Route, submitted by Berry Construction, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 89-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR U.S. POST OFFICE PROJECT - APN 208-351-71 C5. Approval to order the Annexation of Certain Territory to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 6 for OR BB-16 and CUP SB-20, located between Vtica Avenue and Red Oek Street, south of Civic Centet Drive and on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue, respectively. RESOLUTION N0. 89-094 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TM6 ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 3. ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 88-16 AESOLVTION NO. 89-095 ., :5......~- G. '~ L.~ 'III wGi~Gii ur •nc uu ur ewnunu CUCAMONGA, ,CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TH% ANNEXATION OF CERTAZN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 ANO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP AB-20 C6. Approval to reject bide for the Bale and relocation of the Ledig House, located at 5702 Amethyst Street, and permission to seek and negotiate informal nropoeals from qualified buyers for eaitl sale and relocation. C7. Approval to accept an offer of Oed icat Lon for Street Pucpoees, offered as 33 feet for the north aide of Almond Street between Skyline Road and Sapphire 5t rest. RESOLUTION NO. 89-D96 A RESOLVTI ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A 33-FOOT DEDICATION ON ALMOND STREET AS OFFERED FOR HIGHWAY AND ROAD PURPOSES c8. Approval of Contract Chanqe Order No. 1 foc the Arrow Route Widening Project from Baker Avenue to Grove Avenue by L. A. wainscott end Associates, Inc. for the addltlonal study end design of local drninage facllitiee end eddltlonal traffLc signal studies ai the Lntersectlon of Grove Avenue and Arrow Route, Sn the amount of $Sr 500.00 to bring the new contract total amount to $66,447.00 funded by Syateme Development Account No. 22-4637-8736. City Council Minutes March 15, 1989 Page 3 C9. Approval to execute a Profeeeionnl Services Agreement (CO 89-047) with R.1M Design Group to prepare impcovement plane for Milliken Avenue Median Island Landscaping and Reconstruction from 4th Street to 6th Street, for a fee not to exceed $22,200.OC to be funded from the City-Wide eeaut if ication Fund, Account Mo. 23-4637-8814. C10. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security, Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 89-048) and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance Diet rict No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance Oiatrict Noe. 1 and 6 for DA 87-06, located on the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Vincent Avenue submitted Dy Romer Properties. RESOLUTION NO. 89-097 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SMPROVEHENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87- 06 RESOLUTION NO. 89-098 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY I MYAOVBMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM ROMAR PROPERTIES, POR DEVBLOPIBNT REVIEW AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ANO CITY CLERR TO SIGN THB SAME RESOLUTION NO. 39-099 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, OAOERING THS ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ANO STREET LLCHT ING MAINTENANCE OISTAICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 87-06 C11. Approval to accept the Red Hill Park Maintenance eul lding, Contract No. 88-095, ae complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to File a "NOS ice of Completion". COVNCILNOMIIN WItIGBT PULLED ITEM POR DISCUSSION. RESOLUTION NO. 89-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP MNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC 2MPA0VEMENTS FOA REO HILL PARR MAINTENANCE BUILDING, CONTRACT NO. 88- 095 AND AVTHORl'L 1N0 THE FILTHG CF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOA THE WOAR C12. Approval to accept the 9th Street Aehabllitat ion from Cucamonga Creek to Madrone Avenue, Contract No. 88-173, as complete, release bonds end authorize the City Engineer to Plle a "Notice of Completion". City Council Minutes March 19, 1939 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 89-101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS POR 9TH STREET REHABILITATION, PROM CVCANONGA CREER TO MADRONE AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 88-173 AND AUTHOAIZ ING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WOAR C13. Approval tc accept the Victoria White Alder Treea Aemova 1, Contract No. 88-152, ae complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to File a "Notice cE Completion". RESOLVTION NO, 39-102 A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPAOVBMENT9 FOR VICTORIA WHITE ALDER TREES AHMOVAL AND AUTHORISING THE PILING OP A NOTICB OF COMPLBTION FOR THS HOAR C14. Approval to accept Improvements, Releaee Bonds and file Notice of Completion for: 8162 Ninth Stteet Faithful Performance Caeh Bond (Street) $4,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-103 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OP THB CITY OF IUfNCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUELZC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 8162 9TH STREET AND AUTHOAI2ING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE HORR CR 86-43 Located on the nort heaet co f 8th St t d Bak A e Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $226,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 89-104 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THfi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGAr CALIFORNIA, ACCB PTI NO THS PUBLIC IMPROVBMENTS FOA DR 86-43 AND AUTNORI2IN0 THB FILING OP A NOTICB OP COMFLETZCN £OA 2HE WORA Parcel Mao 9670 Pat el / •~ d th th t f 6 and 3 ff 1 A FalthEul Performance Bond (Street) $35,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 84-109 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THe PUBLIC IMPROVEIfENT3 POR PARCEL MAP 9670, PARCEL /2, AND AUTHORISING THE FILING OF A ryOTICE OF COMPLBTION POR THB WORK City Council Minutes March 15, 1989 Page 5 CllP 87-07 located on the eouthwe et n f A Hi h a a d M l e n Avenue Faithful Performenoe Bond (Street) $17x400.00 RESOLVTION NO. 89-106 A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCBPT ING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP E7-07, AND AUTHORIZING THfi FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C15. Approval of $250.00 for the pnrk development fund, Account Number 20-4532- 8770, to cover expenses of the landscape architecture department at Cal Poly Pomona with developnent of conceptual designs for Creeks ids Park. c16. Approval to set public hearing Par April 19, 1989 - Vacation of an alley - Mr. Skovgaard - A request Lo vacate an alley southerly of 9th Street and westerly oP Calaysrae Avenue. RESOLVTION NO. 89-107 A HESOLVTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AN ALLEY LOCATED SOVTHERLY OP 9TH STREET AND WESTERLY OF CALAVERAS AVENUE, APN 207-241-21 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Brown to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar minus Item C11. Motion Carried unanimously 5-0. R R R R R R DISCVSSION OF ITEM C11. Approval to accept the Red Nill Park Maintenance Building, Contract No. 88-095, ae complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to Flle 9 "Notice of Completion". RESGLUTION NO. 89-100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOA AED HILL PARE MAINTF.iriurv^E BUILDING, CONTRACT NO. 88- 095 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOF. THE WOP.F Councilwoman Wright stated she wanted to know how this related to the approved plane and epeclticet ions for Red Hill Park. Russell Magu Lre, City EngLnaer, reepondad that this was a new project to build a malntenanca building only, and had nothing Co do with Red H111 Park Lt self. MOTION: Moved by Wr Lght, seconded by Stout to approve the item end Resolution No. 89-100. Motion cerried unanimously 5-0. • R R R R R City Council Minutes March 15, 1989 Page 6 D. CONSENT ORDINANCES D1. ENVI B33 U S CFI 89 O1 - 91TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to modify the local street circulation pattern within eubaree 8, located north of Arrow Route, between the I-15 Freeway and Et iwanda Avenue, necessitated by a pzoposed MND power generating plans nt the northwest corner of Btiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. City Clerk Authelet read the title of ordinance No. 391. ORDINANCE NO. 391 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIAONNBNTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMHNT 89-01, REQUESTING TO MODIFY TH6 LOCAL STREET CIRCULATION PATTERN WITHIN SUEAREA E, LOCATED NORTH OP ARROW ROUTE, BSTYISBN THE I-15 PRBEWAY AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, NECESSITATED BY A PROPOSED MWD POWER GENERATING PLANT AT THB NORTHWEST CORNER OF HTIWANDA AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. MOTION; Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve the Consent Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. } R R • R ~ aneR11TTARD P[111LYC N611RIN03 (Item EI was considered after Item SS, but the minutes will remain in published agenda format.) The Redevelopment Agency reconvened et 10:10 p. m. to hold a joint meeting with the City Council. (ALSO SEB REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES.) E1. CO SI O H N PROJECT AN F N Jack Lamr Agency Executive Director/City Manager, stated this was regarding the property tax dispute with the County on low and no property tax. Mayor/Chairman Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. RA 89-002 A RESOLUTION OP THB AANCXO CVCAMONOA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, REGARD IMO A PROJECT BENEFITTING ITS RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND MARINO CERTAIN FINDINGS IN RBGARD THERETO City Council Minutes March 15, 1989 Page 7 RHSOLOTION N0. 89-108 A RESOLOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING A PROJECT BENEFITTING THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROTECT AND HARING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN REGARD THERETO MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright io approve Aescl~tion Noe. AA 89- 002 and 89-108. Motion carried unanimously S-0. MOTION: Moved by Wright seconded by Blown to adjourn the Redevelopment Agency meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. R • 1 • R II E2. VACATION OF A PORTION OP ALMOND AVENGE - CAAYN COMPANY -A request to vacate a portion of Almond Avenue, located south of 24th Street and west of Cherry Avenue in the Etiwanda area, approximately 23 feet Wide and 1,312 feet long - APN 226-111-01. Continue to April 5, 1939 due to extended posting time from 10 days before the hearing to 15 ddye before the hearing required under section 8300, et.eeq.r of the Streets and Highways Code. Staff report presented by Russell Maguire, City Engineer. Mt. Maguire requested this be continued to April 5, 1989. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There was no response, but the public hearing was left open. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to continue the puolnc nesting to April 5, 1989. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. R • x E3. V C TIO O JUNE ERRY DA EL INC. - A request to vacate Juneberry Drive, located south of Arrow Route and west of Etiwanda AVenue, approximately 60 feet wide and 710 feet long - APN 229-121-35. Continua to April 5, 1989 due to extended poet ing time from 30 days before the hearing to 15 days Defore the hearing required under section 8300, et.saq., of the streets and Righwaye Code. Staff report presented by Ruaeell Maguire, City Engineer. Mr. Maguire stated that this also needed to be continuxd to April 5, 1989, et which time we will give a full staff report. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Thero wee no response, but the public hearing Was left open. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to coot loos the public hearing to April 5, 1989. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. • R F City Council Minutes Hatch 15, 1989 Page 8 E4. ENV; RONMBNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11780 RORNBLATT - Appeal of the Planning Commleelon'e decision denying a eubdivieLOn of 1.01 scree of land into 2 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (lase than 2 dwelling unite per acre), located on the northeast corner of Almond and Mai Streets - APN 201-071-55. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 88-15 - RORNBI.ATT -Appeal of the Planrz ing Comnieslon'e decision denying a zequsst to reduce the average lot size from 22,500 square feet to 21,954 square feet on two lots within the Very Low Ree idential District (lase than 2 dwelling unite pat acre), located on the northeast coiner of Almond and Mai Streets - APN 201-071-55. Staff report presented by Scott Murphy, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Melvin RornDlaiir 30030 Almond, requested the lots split go throuyh. Phil Herrera, 4949 Ramona, ezpraeeed that the average lot size should be 22,500 square feet and this dose not meet the lot size which the area requires. He encouraged Council to vote agalnet this request. sob White, 4949 Hal Street, encouraged a negative vote on this item. Gary Williams, 9988 Almond, oleo expressed opposition against the lot split. Aandy cometoc k, 4930 Mai Street, spoke agalnet the lot split. Dale Reneger, 9942 Almond, spoke agalnet the lot split. Dr. Rornbl art stated that hie lots were equ are feet lees easement e, while the other lots wars total equate feet, including the easements. There being no further public response, Mayor Stout closed the pu611c hearing. Councilwoman Brown asked how many feet there were from the pool to the property line. Mr. Murphy responded 5 feet. Councilman Alexander stated ha was not in favor of developing the property Lf it was not within the standards adopted by the Clty. Councilwoman Brown agreed. Councilwoman Wright expressed she opposed this because of the property line being eo close to the pool and the elope. Councilman Buquet felt we had set n precedent with the tract to the south sad felt further study could De done, the and wcu ld be receptive to acme negotiation. City Council Minutes March 15, 1989 Page 9 Mayor Stout stated that although ha sympathized, he was not in favor of the lot split. MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Alexander to deny the appeal and direct staff !o prepare a resolution of denial for the next meeting. Motion ca[ried 4-1 (BUquet no). • k f E9. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOVLBVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA - A request to change the proposed location of the notth leg of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pooihill Boulevard intersection, ae shown in the Specific Plan, by the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 fee[ east of the present intersection with Foothill Boulevard. Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer. ,Toe Fau err Tea EE is Engineer and P[incipal of Auet in, Faust Associates, Inc., who prepared the Eeaeibil ity study, recommended a left-hand signal without an arrow. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Dawn Bolinger, speaking on behalf of San Antonio Commun Sty Hospital, stated they have no objection to this plan. Pat Maguire, from Et iwanda, expressed that he could not understand why this change. Elizabeth Galvie, 8166 Foothill Blvd., owner of the service at at ion, also expressed she could not understand why this change. Ben Mackal 1, 9956 Hemlock, representing the owner of the property who has no objection of the realignment through the property, but they do expect adequate compensation. Sohn Vpton expres Bed that those who live at Red Hill should use Vineyard exit instead of Red Hill Country Club Drlve. Dale Frizbee supported the changes ae shown, and recommended a signalized intersection. There being no further public reeponaer Mayor Stout closed the public hearing Councilman Alexander expressed that Chia was, ha believed, the safest, beet and moat economical way to reeo lve the problem. Councilman Buquet stated th ie was the beet option, but still Eelt we should look at Lnetallin9 left-hand turns onto Red Hill Country Club Drive. Limiting acceee with left-hand turns could be done with a median on Foothill. Councllwaman Wright expressed that a median might be the beet way to go nl eo. Ciiy Council NLnutea March 15, 1989 Page 10 Mayor Stout felt that alternative four, with a signalized left turn, was the safest option. Ralph Hanson, Deputy Clty Attorney, elated if the Council was intezeetetl in the use of a median, it should be referred back to the Planning Commission since they had not considered this option. RESOLUTION NO. 89-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02, REQVBBTI NG TO CHANGE THE PROP0Sfi0 LOCATION OF THE NORTH LEG OF THE RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHONN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY TH6 REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB -RI VE TO APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OP TH8 PRESENT INTERSECTION WITH POOTH ILL BOULEVARD, BAS80 UPON AN IN-DEPTH ENGINEERING STUDY MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Stout to accept alternative four. Motion failed by the following vole: AYES: Alexander, Stout NOP.S: 9u gust, Brown, Wright HOTION: N.oved by Wright, eecond¢d by eugvei to refer item back to the Planning Commission to con~Lder alternative five ,++«+. „_„-,,,, ~y,,,i piny •ert-nand to rns. nwoaon carried by the following vote: AYES: Brown, Buquei, Wright NOES: Al exa ndet, Stout R f R R R R (Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:45 p.m. Tne meeting reconvened at 10:05 p.m. with all members of the Council present.) • R R f • f E6. COMHUNSTY DEVELOPMENT BLOCR GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YBAR 1989-90 - The adopt Lon of the Prai iminacy statement of Community Objectives for the Fiscal year 3989-90 and preliminary ee]eet ion of projects baeed on an ant icipateJ yranc ~f 5433,OCC.CD. Staff report presented by Mikt Brett, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no teeponee, the public nearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 89-110 A RESOLUTION OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMHVNITY OBJECTIVES POR THB FISCAL YEAR 19&9-90 ANO RRELINI NARY SELECTION OF PROJECTS BASED ON AN ANTICIPATED 6AANT OP 5433,000.00 City Council Minuiee MaYCh 15, 1989 Page 11 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Huquet to approve Resolution No. 89- 110. Notion carried unanimously 5-D. f R 1 R R R F• PUSLIC NHARINOS F1. TENTATIVE TRACT 13886/CONDITIONAL USE PSRHIT SB-O1 - NALBAND IAN/CHIAO - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving the use of Cal-Shake roofing material for a 66-unit townhome project and a 39,000 square foot commercial center, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Aoad and Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227-552-01, 02, 03, 0A end 227-521-65. Staff report presented by Scott Murphy, Associate Planner. Mayor Stout stated he was on the Planning Commission when the Etiwanda Specific Plan was appYOVed. This was suppose to be a £iret-class project. This particular location will be one of the mete focal points in the Etiwanda area, and he felt that using this type of material would impact the look and felt that the use of ti le was more appropriate. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Address inq Council was: Mark Elliot, Engineer of Nalbandian, stated he felt the material should be considered ae an alternative to the tile. TheYe being no further public response, Nayor Stout closed the public hearing. NOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to Grant the aooeal and divert the Planning Commission to work with Design Review to include concrete rile roof. Councilman Suquet expressed we ehovld get more information regarding the Cal- Shake roofing material. Councilwoman Brown elated the Planning Cortmieaion should consider and make a recommendation whether all buildings should be built to handle clay ills. Larry McNiel, Chairman of the Planning Conunieeion, urged Council to approve this Cal-Shake roofing material in the beat interest for the community. Motion carried by the following vote AYF~: Alexander, Hrcwn, Stout, k'Y fight NOES: Euquet R R R R R R O CITY MANAONR'B eTAlP RNPOATB G1. ~Nr pTOAL PARK DEeIGN FOA TWO TEA_NA VISTA PLANNED COHMUNITY PAAE9 IN TN6 vrrTNITY OF CHURCH STREET AND MILLIREN AVENUR Staff report presented by Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager. City Council Minutes March 15, 1989 Page 12 MOTION: Moved by Euquet, eecOnded by Alexander to approve the Conceptual Design of the La Mieeion Park and the unnamed Y.H. C. A. Park and to include a plaque in the park that was once the labor camp, and to add a pick-up game in the upper part of the La Mieeion Park. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. R ~ f G2. DISCUSSIONS WITH SCHOOL SVPERINTENDEYTS REGARDING SCHOO' DISTRICT/CITY RECREATION PROGPAMMINO ON EXISTING SCHOOL SITES Staff report presented by Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager. NOTION: Moved by Erown, seconded 6y Alexander to receive and file the report. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Councilwoman Wright expressed there was no rush to go out and do anything further with Central Park until the City could find more playing fields. R G3. C S N WBS S PARR CO TRUC IO OU T OP 9 30.0 E UNDE Ro CCOUNT 0 4532 015 - Report on development of plane and epecificat ions for conetructicn of the ten acre west expansion of the Beryl Park Facility. No staff report given. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve the item, Motion carried unanimously 5-0. C4. CONSIDERATION OP A REVIEW PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAKES PORTION OF THE VICTORIA L NED CO D ITY VILLAG F THE L S PROJ CTS. (Wright) No staff report given. RESOLUTION NO. 89-111 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REVIEW PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT OP THE LARES PORTION OF THfi VICTORIA PLANNED COMMVNITY•S VILLAGE OP THE LAKES PROTECT NOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded 6y Brown to approve Aeeolut ion No. 89-111 ae amended t0 include maintenance costs under Item 1 of the ReeOlut ion. Mnt ion carried uranimcualy 5-0. Councilwoman Brown stated that maintenance coats were not included end she had requested those previously. . x GS. CITY COUNCIL DISWSSION FOR NAYS TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION KITH VARIOUS £Qf1HISSIONS AND OTN@R AGENCLBS. (Nright) Continued from March 1, 3989 Meting. City Council Minutes March 15, 1989 Page 13 Councilwoman Wright stated that after looking at all the agenciee she had identified eleven chat would De Oer fires option, but there were four she considered abeclutely necessary to meet with on a yearly baste. The eleven would include the six convniseione, the County, the school districts (all Logeiher), Chaffey College, Cucamonga County Water District and Chino Basin (together), Foothill Fire District. If we Oad four meetings, she would consider the Fire District, Cucamonga County Water District and Chino Basin (together), the School Districts (all together), end all the Coemieeione. ACTION: Staff directed a letter 6e drafted for the Mayor's signature to the eleven agenciee to solicit interest in meeting with the City Council, and for staff to bring a report back in one month. G6. GROWTH MANAGEMENT - A follow-up disco ee ion on the items discussed at the City Council •e March 4, 1989 workshop. ACTION: Council concurred to continue this to the next meeting, but to place it earlier on the Agenda. • R • R R a. cove2czr. EDSINESs Nl. REPORT ON WATER CONSERVATION IN LANDSCAPES. (Alexander( MOTT ON: Moved by Alexander. seconded by Stout to continue this item Lo the nazi meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-O. ACTION: Council concurred in eetaDliehing the policy that items continued on the City Manager's Staff Aeporte should be first on the next agenda under City Han agar's Staff Reports. • x I. IDENTSPICATION OF ITEMS POE NEIT NBETINO councilwoman Brown asked that a Park Watch Program, by the City, be placed on the next agenda tc include how much money could be saved with such a program. She also Yequeated that we cone ider putting copies of all minutes from all commies ions end City Council into the local library. Mayor Stout requested that an item concerning Work Release Programs, to Lnclude weed and graffiti removal, etc. be considered. Councilman Buquet requested we look at traffic shut-downs during rush hours; in part Lcu la r, the Haven landscaping shutting down during peak traffic hours. R • R • R R City Council Hinutes Haroh 15, 1989 Page 14 J COMMUNICATIOHe PROM TH6 PVBLIC Jim Bookout, 5961 Layton, asked why, when the report on the coat for the recall was given, there were no comments made. Council did not reepond. Hr. Bookout also asked What rules and standards the Council conducted their business under. Councilwoman Wright responded the Chair rules. R R R R R f NomioNx Moved by Wright, eeconded by Brown to adjourn to an &xecutive Seeeion to disease labor negotiations. Motion carried unanvpouely 5-0. The meeting adjourned ai 14:00 midnight. Respectfully euMnitted, Beverly A. Aut helot City Clerk Approved: + O O O O O O x0000 00 aPO.wyaPhO ~ <I O in O aOU~Omy OO P(nn I 1 i~ I I O lPprvyry ryNa Y+ J 61 I I m y t Om y LL S~ y rv t Ou~a N.pP OtiNarO~O .~ apOyrv m.r n PO .~ .000mm~.J+-+y al-.p aNgNNP PPPPPPrv o o.. .. a~oa mo maooo.o ao mono < ON+~y rvNNrvryNNNrvNNNNrvryNrvNNNNrvNNrv TI Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~'Immmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm V S~ O NU LI-L NL I-L~ LLi L x caaoLLmr Dm .o lzym PV m3 ~-JrO./yL-~ WOE ,-I rnlr ry r t m>m Y p m0 6mWmy W m0'¢ 63 T. ¢6 _ < _ zmVm _ _ _ _w0 x J u rJ <Y O O OOXr< 00p DL D < L O< 2 V S Lf W 0- W~ JWrw6 WJ:J wV~ W ~ P 6 ~ xV' WFN N Ki p . Vm >l w u N uN0 2 YO¢ r ~ L < ~n V a u Yai w m m ~~ r 6 Y <D Y6 HW~ < Z rJ YvIUl O ZNZ66 00~ V< Via. wLLV~PY wW>aL < 4 o D tY~ZOU ~OOw LL<wwLLVrwF ~ ~ O O O O O u .n < - Wwm SOD ~Wrru JLLYw~n 2<w V U U V V U -W LLY[K VW~~r<- L w~ lbw O YN Zww O>ww.[ rar win LVY iy Du .Ui ~ rvUi r V SYS ZUU Z<i+CU ri <~Y=LY Y > i i i> i i i LL .LL,°u no ~:»N o'iaiW Zr>V < u a V VL r Y J 7 M1 t ~O n J V4 V In L U w c ~w rW~/I U C _ O < ~ ~ _Y_ w K SrFOO~ <_ V V UOU 2 <Yr bt U a zH< t~~<N 2 YLLL J~`tXw Z 2 XUw~n X~t Vr LUJrLLOJVO V < O " LL <J~«3 «<OLL ]pUO.=n IYiVF~ O w 0+0220~ r S r V 7 J LL R WYVLL~- UwIY w2 wYr00„rSV F z u z ~w << azwr< w xoD J z z w r o ~ s ..zpo"¢ .z.<z.<-D <m'iuu~aaN ~ r '~ ~- ~ V vi ~[ O inV WO ran « !««< a o P o a~N'i sop..n y mci°rv i N P -. .. N m o +oyi ~- mrw Y.a Y..m Orm I .. N N w N o~ora•+ooNO arPOOPOnaoPOtiNaPao.. ..o ..noop+NOa oooNarvoomo rooowornoow Pocaaao,~..no 0 ~ O~r~P~JOnrv•~O ••+Nnrm rvObyr Ory nPrvPPO raP~ nP •••~~•~ mn n+ LL ? if N y .r .r .~ ~C n±PO^NW'L r.pP wPa^Nm+WanwPOnrvmru•anN .• +w aaaaaaryaa aaauuo~nao Nar nonom om nomanamoud .~i %~ <~ mmnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnm~mm~mn u' °m S jf Vm i LYlti W', in rni-•r-'r~ ~O ¢r M 'r ~~n ~+~+'• in ri y ti L wV¢w 2'C .n¢¢CQK•L RN Lw ~n2 _P 7V tFrr1- w J-00 ' -• OLLOOOJOJ # O LLLOVD y W w' 70~ W<W l< WYWWVWwW Wr WnLSW¢ OVL ~¢ OJW OW ZWVLNO ^ w w wLL OOJ l 4¢=u t{ iv NKV N m - O'Vn dYW2 O<ySJ 9Umf~i .n T< w Y W1L OU<ww W'ZYmOG NY2 60 VLLj> w nJN OW1a 1^a1~3n~Y y 5 K rZi J 2¢ _ __ .. U nn a~~n VO a ~O NUJ nrO SZ N u.~~ s-iji~wn'O zL<YOZ~ v mu~Nn n Z w .~. Lm zOfJ ~F OnJw OW mPPaOu~wwLLJ -r M..F u ~i'rnLL oJw~O W~OFOOOU•w OON•Y'•-• m 00¢ ?~ 2 uOUy.O •n<„S<LN•n• nJ¢wLOOO Y`ly a#~WV'l Zu '~ rLLMw <uIW~PP-0h#n<?u~Y www w<a pJ n/~3 TJPWNKUS420S.+## i+Nw i-V w N6 _ZD O<0 _ fWr.QyU JuV LV wGLLSwhLLiiO¢61JU2 I >wVVUVVpw¢6.nOULJSL Y iK ~w- Ohw P9 w.• 663w7«~<6Nr<u•'urvVO.•W O` >.u (]J <~+~L ~ni i>¢<~p'-u.u OOw4V1Ym>m' N e`za s V YV wV l V in U - 2 667 ~Z r V I V Z'~ uOJr Z •J ~t O OOOOO in0~ Y yr Try (l LZ p m Z u a nVO w2YOUr rVi`) ¢w¢wZZ~UyO in r U r 9 'J"~" < -- suiis s<LUJOiF S w~UZT VgJ~YNZf Y'n m~VGC:00¢Ja ~OL< UVf] yR ~..iuw YF- .niJ7 VUVVW.~OW u'u. 2L2 Oj ynL{u.n ~-' 6m OV6 w~nw r+0 YGJ V u ~~3V WiJ r Y f<t «r-J¢ OWJ ~ OVCZ= Vuu2n ~LFw~wZVV~')J V~<u 010)~wl. i w>6 u ~n uG~Y wJ Zen CYY 2 t2 < wu~ F~Zw w U 60VU ZQwWY• T.w u0000 w'< O ~u YOU~LR3 u. Fw % J L1 •nZYY UN2 L¢ i00LL'¢Z 4'OQ ~~~r w31VYLLV6<uU<LJY JRww`Hrw ~f 4FV ¢~FF ~~n y{___ 19 VU jrvVWWi-r '-~LW uvi6 2GJ < f ••O ~J»>O 7 <N<WWU<L <fuf ep YiwrNLV I.N ViV VVVVUUVLVUVVVVV00000 IOOVww Y I n w'nrvtimNU~wmr naaPrvONnn+mn ~ OV~9P ^oPPmOr+.p+mFn+wWL.D .ON nvP ^a00 vW^ + u POP anP •• rpJ~nry n0 i rv y N .• N N~N N ~+.~ w oo.u mmNU ooN c~,poo rorrv,o °o°o +.m. m°o .°p °o T OYOOrTOOPr nyOVUOn ~ wONN~ .~ n O^ -~ rv.In Jm.~ m ~n u J < .n n .r n .v .• .pr9P0-~ ~.+.pryPO-+nm PU~yr iO PO ~+ :~.prYPOUn mu'.n ~d c mua.m Po-POOOpopooooF-~ NNNNNNNhnNN VNVN t~ mmmmnmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmm mmmmmmmmmmmmm <w V ~ _ L% T r '.-i n u r n .r S V V ~'O p ~> <tP .c ~Y 6in tC¢v'Y¢¢KJ' SL < _ ___ ___ V•+ LilVw vi > { O Y>` U ~n poci`~o p =i~N°rv i:pOU rNa o~< < i ~~ ~ D ~U ''IW W=WrJWW 'Y SWR ~W'^ t6<Y.pW q6 UVW uV SN { m¢ J2wi pip ~ldti ~?U wt 1dJFY ~Lu o v~~` azw HJ ai~Wa PN to waJ aau- wort N,~mY~ niso >~ar .wi„Ni~F~w'nYWi2~n ~. m•UN~NWL ."~qw.-a ~W..N p .w ~-a r<a.r Z ~ w?YO p n o>SYM 11• 0 WdU_V ~SVS Tz¢' N<~~ ru~SHONJP~~~Id?wJNWrIL IOaQJ<J.rZNwK uZZO~w¢mwY J wN 6'JJ? pwO-•R ii SN _ _ _ __ NV in r- u~wY~rN OulwtQ ~~p uNYw wN Nti>NwP~UJOONU~OpQ~Oi it U rrr ywu~i{UwLdNUpwuwLL <Vrmuu VwNL <r W ~o r> ~ it a p~ u is=: _ ~< 1 UK~prr Jp~ 6>NWD V_ V= u ~6Z JWw~~-rf> C~O¢~Z [ /j6 wrliNpJwu O<OZ~If~Y U' ;w uCL=•-~K 6n< >ZwrVK Sr2_ <U '> r<r p6u<~ Jj¢ WS J~J<Vr6URrL+O¢V a.Z.V V¢O +I p_NU <UNwr YVJw~ZUyri~Yi urc~aJY U« ~ .nL2¢<y rY<U Mf: CEN L ^.z`~ '~~' ~aoa w .~. uz °a uwr ,t .wiUiiiaii r 'i .~ONL SFN • r uESr2YJ V~~nOVYIr ZuN O iuwLLLLwuV~SOZI~N2~.>p-'.ti ~ti~~Y yY~~up Jpa<r S~yOV~~"ON _ENw IL ' Nom r.~..NN fPUwmmovmPm.u ol-~om ms a.a , a M1~ N! .4 ±.+lpJSm u~ry±ryu~ru•F ONNNOw + I h •rOUrv Or rn P Pf hN .~w'r N NJl~O NrWn 3 oo+ovooo~oPamoac o..to vo,~ai-..tool-onanoo-. o omo..oa..ao.. oi-oar..a+roorNPwovwon n..t ..n ro r ..o.noNO.uoor,uou..n :mmhoaa9 o.:, o~v rv m.~~-.o .~.o d~yry mr oa oroo ai-a.-a'-+o'+ '-n -. .a ~.o-.m S I w ? ; n .r Y in .~ n 6 2 9POrnrl +marWP O-~n /~r.n .O ~-mSOtiNnrN POrN~'IY Jti rvv: .nammaaaaa p ~ ~ ~Y Lr I-Jw ..~ P ¢tirrr+ .vr V ~VrN< r rrrrn 3 aKts~¢¢ Yy 6s.¢ZN R ¢¢ C w w ww w .y0 wwwut ww¢w r aF<x"'cF x C axxx-' ~ xmx~xxx '.]OUwLL .Ji u]<U~nVU J Um O'.J70R 10n]mU.]7~jO ° Jm l Z <m au . i..JZ ~USw .~YWVtu W.J W~' aW 1~J WWWW ~ rCXW wL~- •U ~tI6 60 V ¢V~ JJO¢ w.c ~- wV mV ~ Zrw Yw'r Nw' v('~ UUW O¢ ~Y r DV ~w r Woaw ~ Ns~n J~ ~ 1 60¢r wOp¢ ~UW wVm mOOrww~ xK~U N>.+ OOO a:]u Ot'-~U=Vw aUJSwuOV U'am uV Nnv wN-s x ^O<Jr02 U a2 ~KYw< 7Um ¢.V 07<6 .n O~nrP~v~i ~uV¢7 ¢J I-S K'nwr Pin Zr t]ia i~a `'z o~' +,vy naw~m o. cxi i x. .'z<Lw iii iia 2w~= ., ta¢~ wi~nm ou~i~u ~;+ii~~.~a.~ Hpr V a2 StJ __N iVXawtE 0202 LP22Uw .V.SUN 7 WJ~+] NY .Yi.SNNL +Sn <.+~J Pv'f 1-a • rJw..L2 ~+a fJ w4wOwwOrw~i~+r r. n'<m9 >'^m SsV ~n L'J LLrU^L .. >., x~m ~a6 W¢iu¢r.n .+¢<V.ra/ Y u< w Vu wQ G V L ZGL i W OOOP r> '+ V L 6~ 6 2 UUOC1 w< s.n r wwww (dj u G V r ~nL V~ O «« VL 2~ v~¢ZZ ~ .~S iw iJY CL iC~ a --- ~ '~ r<uu oaou .n r~J24 .~~L¢w uixiY ~.. .~c¢ ~cawyro 'z-'i~» ¢~o ~ a ¢ Lw o~ym ULw o.. x¢w.r.. < s..wa ca ~~" ~z ¢~n„tr ii iir° ~~i ¢w¢Prare~<«z<P. pjOi¢ quo a~iu~<uut~ :~ . w¢zwwa f ¢r .. z V 2'+lUr UO w.yF U~+UVwV<~s~tO LU 1L2iL O2KR¢ y 2.+w~Y6< OaFY r<~+r0 Ys<w o<~ z~ <ooo°+u~w¢r¢ ~c z.W.. w]o .W ww,~¢xxxow ¢ iii~i w ¢L~ZU2xN .-.UO 9Z ¢LO UVUiy2Nwu2<wmYaU~ /1? NFL F'i-X¢V OVw'+JW2226 V1-j73 ¢2SZYa 7JJ7 r.0' «<.-'fJ fZ¢T <a '-~40~1f000w OC]p C1 )~ya->>,r~ZL.:222 JOV0~¢4R6 ¢¢C¢¢22/.]K V/~ fN~6 ~n ~n ~n v' O nPN e~P.-. ~OLN~~rva rt. .O LN,Ownu~L+JP + lTn6al rla mj'r0 wOma VSO .rrv rvY•n ~O ~n ti.r ammmmm a -. ~ nNr ~rNn n n -.+a.a n ^. n nn uoo~n:ooo P~.. O°ov °.~ ~~ t~00NWWmPWpOPPN+atAU~u~W rv '+On.Om e. -.r Nm .. -~.. m i <~ n o~rvm+~ P o .. ~arvp o'~rvm v m o mnm Pp ,i mmm~mmrvmmmmn,..nmm mmmmmmmmnm ¢ ~w~: u.. iii i J oow ° u o .. .. ... «. ~x~ __ ~< J Orv.rw 1 t2N 2 - niDm m ^J (i J ] O ~u ' r rZw Sm V rw t.l W OVw ~2~NHU u i-2n rVN.~ OL OPT 6~nV3~V~n W.vO ~ 7N~ y02 O ~V~nO Vw _ DJ u'O tiYU~¢ w0 J+ p m V ~ Sm0_O 2aOr r 1¢-L JUm 00r Nu .i i %m a >iu bP.iOOJV.rO ~603NOL.Im9 a%Ln am JOV wPw CSOi VOw O~-t w3t'a rr~a LL •OYrV .+aw¢a r OW¢NO~+W wS w2O{u~31 r2 ~V J .lY j J V m > S N N 1 6y j ! ~UI Z HUn u i+LFZ ~ - wLJ<Ow2 w V .rOP¢iiY~¢wV6-~.[IwV+L~n WmL {v~N{ W 1 N Z V O ~6 O W V ~ t) ~ W « V J 2 L Z2 a CK pZV~ {V N2 OW Un.<i <F J I t{ M<Z LW < Q Z~S 44 ~1-r~R'a LN ~"2~uO V~ p iVu.m ¢VY¢ ii2 ~+ WVrwp<¢4 <6~HJCwC ~ "O ~n Y 112 60> TY mOUO Z ZU V Z T ~Su ~4W I LYn OD% r o J Ow OO SnVr < ¢Z'r ~u ~ O S J V~]31L 3 ~+23~n ~n r'6 %R 7'Jf «22 O { ~o = F~-lw j>i i iO V y. gnu- i l - > Y SS SX WPrv PPin r-mT m~-I-pP NaaaY~OP.+NPNamaOrv~"~u~~aa0 I NrvryN rv .r rvN ~ a oaooo..oNOno r,~ooooooooovuomooo o.,v om +oo+c raoNOr-~a~..~oomomooooNOh onNO o0 S 1 vOONO.II .LOO n~-DOO JU amOOPnOpm00 ~NO~PVP~ mO+~n N .• n rvO r n 31 Y rv OPOOOOOJOOOO O~NmVSJ ap0-.NmVa.Jry Nnnmmmmmmmm < 31 mmm mmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMmmmmmm V r _ nP. O Oii ZiY U r~ti M r •+ r J K u6'Y PW ZCW JK2 P P m S Fw2 YSZ Nmu p2200tY 2NY N£jY ZJOO O ~ ~'v mOLJiV u0uPN0 mWWW .J¢P ..J ^NWW V{ ~R~~wVO.O n¢ O 6>~~<3 wSUUO WRODU>R i1JL rV LLO <V tt~ifY ~>Ot' ¢YK~Z ¢K d p<R'L<VN <OVO ~Y WD~+ 00 W Wn wOF'XO {JL<N6Z V0 <K <UOOaNw ESN ~L .n>6 m~Un ~+VO ~ >~~'. NOJ ~Zw< LOu u>uwi N4u 7UwP w>~[ FVW mYYiVK aJUZUh>NwrZGNLLrvZ N>6'Or vniLl U~u w> {P<J rC K~YFW<M1 ¢2 r-Lw V~-mVJ Y2FV V7r< p U ~+6 ~ <Zw~-R of win ZF~O a'JLL ~Vrp'~r'nSH S 6~v 2ruVtiVt Z2¢ZNrZN~mN ZLNZ 2MYUNZrn ~i2 H 2Nw~ ~-<JO< .~V6titSUM¢.n>VO ><X'.u wu~ uJRN ~tX «OJO>1n.-rLN ~n nruK<wmFK O.uwrnwww.Gnrt~L'w/~~ONV <w L2t LL FV~r U ~ hS V •i i<~+ 23 Z V O > > V U 6 SS UO w a><-~w i N Kar LK aiu » z V w<V vniWw Zt{ JSNW {< L 2¢6 N< » ooL ~Z~ZOZ VL w0 NO J{2aO U1 ~+V 2 m SLL'+wf SUMO wUWOaO ~[ . Y ZrZrW¢S`/~~LJ YO N>J L'Lt 00 wV«W<6 r,.~r-r0 mL2J n<~~+ww K2UV O U«6J2<4R «V02U r wi S2LL «wwt Oj6JWN mfN NU ~~VWl+~ O<h< ZZJw<Wm JNNNU6OOSJ tiiw OZ [¢~JV MOwa 1-mw L V<h<LLVZ ¢W~OOZ x+.12 Z}T~~W<2Zwww 12~WOWIU<VK¢14 2 ~ O<YwrKww023S>VVO~+ .+< 41 ~¢'+~hrw4 _a 1.~nRNNY<OOw00<NLLNwWI<~La2K 7N ~UU~W R«4<Or~~w¢r O7RJ mfhn<r~OWw<J <<4<4 « tt~<<m<6mma90am'n mammyVr~VNNVYKVVLLN P <i mryw+nmmO m-.mm POn r~wmPhnrhpm .n ymP+.. V aP d^'N „PPa~~.Pm~PhmmP.~ N JnnPPn^T^ mmO„ P+myi.p mrnm m+P~.N +f r -'rn -~rvN N Nrv NN N N rvN rvNrv N~'r roPOONaoorNmooPOV maomPrmmm ooNrvoooo+. .~ .. ou.aa~~-oaa aonoomn m,., ..r nn,.~r °ooomooom ol-N N ri .:oNn min Nya oNmy~~~,n oorva~r NV OO O.-rvmvmom a Pr ..m .. m a °in-.mmn<.amr..mrPOr u ~i PO~.N ~- mrNaN mho nNmrN a~-mP s. ai-m o irv aaaaaaaaa <i Nmmrv mnmmnn m mm si mmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mm mm i rs s oW N... my~s'^ N sc ~z r. WFw ~`,m s nz s ¢¢¢6W s „p¢WW s¢iw,6p .. o xx x zxF~x Fm axzFZYFx xFS z 00 a ooo~ mom -~ooonooa ro ou r r~~ - WW .Up U NW WWm V'Z^ d PWW WV.p VyVV.n Oa W.vryUV Wr t Q V r S mLiwYw V i •a p Z2 ~ •~ H bR p- L OpL ~ J> Yr6p _Om ~h Z mW r < 'O ~WwwOpw; y< nNVV Zi-.< Sp pN ^r Vum WOw ZV.v ¢ >O mpwV <uNiVL ~ ~~-.L~SY ~nQy¢na~Oi jH.nLLa oyF ¢~>O¢ pio.+ w:`iJ Na< Wu>m iNiu.. uwiLaaMa~NNra aWn~JOm:a "'.z. injNnF~-¢a :pF~ „~ i iiw mooJO~< " sz i ~ oi~zm -N oW~Hny,::a o~: „zmy FL NL:.z.u¢mm~.z r`)u czioppzLLN>uoun um<¢~- ¢..oz.NS.w~ "' iN a N~o~~ r~+..m NOUr z¢ t~-..fin ,~i 6..nLL znsw pzmoiw~ u~ P¢mor Wo< rWO x~.p.LL °~`isi.. zor .Jmuw< w xWSCpo~ .. WLJ o «ooWONWYx>i~., <01-¢ rjmw O~+¢ PP w¢J r SwOw Jw n ~ ~wS 6.pPp<uru.nw KUOrYn ~RVUZrVUVN¢Om¢NVrN .. Wrz* N r _ uu ~ a~ .° wi a iYr o i ..o = ~2ii nii m i"WOZ z.w~.o N u Z F .u i~0 OsN < OW¢,6 ~U 2 J6a < Z L`M r6 rT mrJ c] ZO'1y Nn u ¢ o z n ¢m ., s ~~ i N •'~' oxz<u Neu or~< ii-< ~~~r~-i WY.~.w m.a - w x ¢.,.u m wuJ p¢ z o¢ izo J<ra~nr-iz: r"'~„ I'-<uY<UrWWm~m JwOmJ<W F< _VU<rv< 00<n<J JF ri yyrom.-aiN>ps zN N¢ O OruyJ<nJrOZYWnti>OmU .77NS nR<~1-p OU0000V ~ YZ¢OUO-~j~n<OJ r>< v~ O ~~Z p¢¢Zrw U VUOj z u..~a<oW<z zzowozzzNnu=Wp< a ~pruii°o`)W NrcN„o oN «ow zaioJZ iW ZrOUi)W<iiK mWOiW<VZS<W2 ~ FFF O<rZJY .~`QwmW YnrrnJSV J<rrN< mOWy J¢U NSHN4wi2w <~yp 6Ft<V6NN>JM(WJ~ZOSNOJww r<OJOO~J S <.S SWwwU W~"~«<2 rSw rW0060~+JG¢6 m VUU6VVU9VUOr OOIV~NOOOO00LWWwmwWww9WLL1UVV 'UV P <i Fr.~00N NI~-N nPNrNnOO1~N1-m mP P1.ImP FPrraO ammPPaPI~ r mOmmary±rmNmWmOnmOONNr Nor NNman nYPl~mml`O rryP PNnNmrraonnooagN ar-NnnaNn nr N~ ~ rv N NNN nN O OO NOrv OPPU~~' hOhr+00 OP+m000+ON000C GNi-'n OOh~~NhOmm I-P mmOO+:rOmrm~3~mmrvOOpm0rv000r ~' L u~Ohh mLrrW s.pnr WOONPO~ < hWP np~nn0~0^Nrv nrnF nP ~am n mn"N'O ~nr n. .. h.,od~aarW i P m -' m •. om .. i -. r s m i v ornmrmahmPO-.nr+r~n.o~-mPO-•nnrm.n r-mPO~N~..+W.DhmPn mDLWa9 mPPPPPPPPPPV000VO0000r-~r r•vr•'rrrr f rV +rN v i ~ mmmmm~•.nmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnmmmnnmmmmn~.. ,.~mmmmmmm 0 1 L _lL < U r T fr rOP ¢ N O J I• ~- ~- w >~•~ r r+ -~r~ u n rr •~ Ow ¢ ¢ ss ¢N ~s¢ z ~x xmss w~NZ xW rz xzmxx xx zJ r2sD ru x~-<•ri > cwiuo~ o°< ._oa~chio mca~ oi'~ o>pPW ~ °° s °z uO~WW¢ m41_ LW.vWVn WN W>Vh- n A'IIZ < i2<i 1 { i ~ WS YYh^ O OJNW ¢W VP h_ ¢122 m .2IIR uOZ iN.<+ -u 'J-~ o wi.¢ aWwzw¢nsz sNW ¢e~w 's~N as.+>i¢ in oN ..m pz wo°mT< >fs mxwmJ wp>r 'Dfpp z..." wows p° ..~> Lu¢us is <Nww WU_ V •6 <ON w¢¢ Nq¢ NON Np -PN NOTwZO1W~wV OW X20 t°N u V YNmZ Y N° w ~-OF<N6Nj N20u0 ZWhyj6 N Mr02JJZZl>P> V^I UUOUwO<O¢<~Nf(]Z «NWUZ<U m6wf0 r~LLOZVww Uiy <S ZO`l2<UZ'VR r °oam >N-~~¢NU~zN °.+ .z.ou ..~~u< zPSi zNiwi~~" iYpw ups.. rprLJU iz .. ..sjJ NCO iJJ2~¢~ru2¢OmSJwN> >'p2M V' r>mJYU NVw~ wS W>¢uuLOU<VmNSU S'LNu Jf%>:wwJ>-/w J00<'w pN1240wuZwQw\<02p¢.70 4 ~-W -„~~~wwJaspmawsm¢Wm><m<.•u-.¢uJ ¢>.N mjL<u<m< zz V'J w ~ V < 2 Z r+ V SSF rVr 2 _ V ¢2 - V O r Z V _ Op6 ~ N ¢U7 N NU J G VU < w<i •U _ f _ ~~ 'J YJ Y-r how u < ¢ r yu _ LL < C mm~¢ r Wpwh N VrJj'-' uOZNrS' _ u w'w• J 6 N t t - J~ 2 O 6 6 u¢ ¢<_N jJUVOp <60rw b ~ h w« <pN Y U ¢¢VZ6 J~h ~ZWl2~6 ¢w ~>VJ WOWh O W• NV< «2rVmr+ u2 LS>ZZZ V6 wV w6w NJ{wNJ w06 JOpU _O VJf rW_ ~ YZ_O _O VZZhN<F iu r>2 PU w6YW >r 1 LFO< <>iWw ZJVV YwWHO '+WwJ V2Z1-OL Ni(N ~LL ti YON >•O IVNJVJ6V -~ Vh¢ J6w> N¢r~2%Z ¢prV~>i ¢p0< a ZwF VO3MNYtm2h OV=p>h¢1LL m¢Z 6pVL~2pW<UZjJOOIZ Omu'SwhYNNf{222 rr~~Si ^rVU-~~~YYYY~JJ '1JJJrJOmSYZ P T~~ h~0 r0wrrrwNO NN~r1<mmmNNmNPmmr Om ~lPm1-•~m Oy~OrmO r R' ^P VO~ryti.<i .prmNYWrr+mrli..ryp •y Pryr'rm mNNmNhryN 1 N Nr NNn Nor r•+a ^rv0 H•~~•1rym1~1 yNNnr rVN m Ol•OpOdOOPmGOOU•ti Z+•0000^WONP^ OO~OdP + 1 i ~-Om0,~0'd dOU~nOP P.n •~ m00 rvPOv -.OPOU•Y .~ vON•+O ^'~rv +POPn~ hh dN C~-mn n-.~N c..m m..m •~...somn -• m ~i . o .. •. -. ,.~ N a i i .. .. POnN u.dF mPO.• NynYPO-~ NWa CI NNNnnnNnNryNnnnN NNNnnry U SI mmmmmmmmm r.mm mmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmTmMm O LLa~L ~Yrw Vr¢LL yL S w0 OwWUW rnruTi` O~ .+r •r•J r rr... u r+ z rYW ~r u ¢ .:am ¢ as teas ¢.c ¢ iii~z•. Yxuzm xzzu~ Nzixx a x2xz~xz i-z op~do~ m ~ tlo ra ruY ° roc p -n•p uuuPWm nwLWO uuujNi~vu<uu o uumx~uw ;W -~ ¢ za a> rzNw WuNY z O~rWra UN ~~ rOMN O< wN V Want K Yim w2.7S WJ VI¢Wr• JYUUO nV ¢1.-wL20LLJrN 62aNOLLwW K LL hrNLL~<VV.< rNaWN~rl by in^ VUUw rf•~ ~'~ ~- <lF 2UmOY u0 ZO¢U s=2 <WNU'-C6VW•+•nt>N NSr>V ~ < 'm¢NN wZLUp< w YOmY wm ~ <0-~20wW~m wuwoo<~ ¢ ~. Nrx r ~w wNdr~FNao u2F SN<W6m~ •O wr6ut OUYNVV W< U¢¢~-'rrpL tm ZdLNO V < 'P W.wNFr N WYUiuw Lpw{ rXU< w>OpYww00 OV NW ~>i r2m <>a~S~wwNIOZUZ6nWN OZFr rmwL. nOLLII wZrNmV •.Vw< 2N2 NL 9r<tlar rmN aLwJ Iwm uVi .LVxiwJP rN~'O LL¢N >.p OV O Yl ooia°LLC¢2...Nr tom °a JrNUna.uro <u xw¢oo SrNr~ ow•.»W•-•.naa~o»~ui„NU<~< - .+~o w.»< i i."i .-a i.+m SUi¢LW.. .'J..w uwm<w ..<LwL3iNmJr zumi~ u n z u_ u a __ z a ~i ~ s z a xu o V <¢W w V aZ3 YN ~=0 i < wJ wN SO Y a p 6 qr NS •X V . ` ~urx Km V~ 2~ tiV uN >t w aUJ izu~sc _ J< an <Y i.<z ~` o~H;J~ziN~u .". r°-i, i,`,.NJ awo ~»ww ~",>„II' 3 VLJ JZi ORLL2 w r7<~ <WJVr w00 ~6 ~ OLY w3U< yLL rN> VO ~ w OJ<r0 < inY W.t2 ¢UOa WSON~n Nj¢ <ZWr OJ2 rSaLL 22w O Y{ U< VwUSwNJr V V2v yi O¢< Sp0 ~ O UZar NS SW ryN ~? Oirw r•• SSVV •V Urr< ON «^i JO rJV><Tr UYVUNNYS u< LtlwV~n z N~~ZIYJr%wFU<UmN<rV LH ~-. iN <wSwVV Nw~XrwNFr<¢tl J < N2rivw tiwYl ~ ~YY UfC 3l3<Nwr <6L. V< Z r i <OZ¢L 30! a6 ¢^~ a0't<TmmY•r26 <N21 y~yU V¢ JrLWrF00p7 P < <aVUwr.+it l<WO'7 .ULZSO2«<UWrO¢<6aa6¢~ LLFLwaLiLiiG2Z2Z2220000000yIIGp6Lip64p666O ON,p OFmdmmPN+ONmOrNPYrNFrrmmrmm FmPPPdrOnmW PI"rN m mNMmmnmmPl•IN•t tp m .p00<mmrNNNOmry•pW + 1 d rdn NN~Nn .yN NPdryry N(/1/P\~1.pNrNFryNdO N•nm MNN N PON•DP Ow^OOOOP CUaO d0000rta0 OOpOOwOh O.n mrvu0 1-O Pmin Pp00000uaP OUaY000hOry00wOUa-. i~in OmD mOOYm n mOamyYOdrvq.~NdmYOmOG NCO WwrmOhNYY <r ^O~ n.pmNOin Yh-+YOPnO.v m Y Yn mPdn ~ Y N rv inY nmrv m n 0. f .. .+ N N 3 I 2 in wryPO^NmY Ua PO-'rn mYnWFWPO^N NSI-WPO -~N O ~Pdddddwdhh^hr-I-hY~ PPPPPPPpP000 Y NlN uaW dW V_ 31 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmnmmmmm a LL LJ LLL i OJw V w 6 < O .L ¢ 70¢Y ¢¢K6m uDwN ____ Om SZ PZ C ~ O^P OVrnO < OC Sh^N r<PV OOOON r+ P ] WP^ MWW ^W rWW 2^Nm ¢VWJ WWWW~ u%RR W R J R~RV rRY.Ji P¢I w N^ O __ F_¢wOVrw ~ V ¢ ¢ S qT •660< O 60 ¢TG% H Ow qS¢ OLONNO wVV•n ~mr OW -~ wp0 p> ZVwuO w2\¢ ^aN iu w." "rii ->w Nz o~¢zwNm -.>WV+~•n <w i•.~a ¢x~o' s~z.-o Y¢¢ NuN ~nZ 2rUi0 ~2N N2a-rL«-t .2 Nti<~ •^-iNN rnVww ii.. w0~^.~Ow rWw ->VU m<~~VCr-N ¢VUVV wVr~6NOyYZY „2 an Wac r.ru 2<Wr=4 O~+ •O OL VJVK< w2 OWLLgVFmrO<OgUm lh6 r-rVf YwCGJ 20 ZZO~ uaZ22q ZO¢w wiL Vr-r0 ¢fLU _J» ^L7 7Ji-r0^PY ~ WOKr N']TNV _ ¢2Y^ ¢Zu mq¢6^~<wNmu2i{^VS< Jww wNwNwwi m .p0 S rn N u ¢ O 6COV NK¢6•nY Y¢~~N%PPPU^ULL V F VV6 .+ > z w ao VV > V __ V O RVw W r-i <02N 1000 > LV C ¢ N L3r 2r~ IV< V{00 YOrr w O .Y ~ V w¢n0 22 1 SUO wV ~rUiYF.OiF ww^ ^OON 2222^ tl oar' <>f< ZV~]¢ ¢22Y ZY 1-U nZLL••• OC ~'N S~.n ZV r-ZZwiyN 'y+2 6r< a°-icrN°oo•'n iu~WF uiox i¢o ~{ ui 0 owLyoo<<w z2w <mW<'.z cola 2z¢ i'i~i '~¢ QV ZI-V UQYNF2o2 rwfpV2 YVUVVON aq O V<OJJ O•rf wwwUNYU <~n WN>O F ` qN2 tV Vr-NVi-.SNL000N¢`~2 2 N2Uw22Z2j YO NS Zwhr:a {rr hr 6uw VNw2¢R ~w f2 J O_00_ONwr2u¢VNQ NNKW wOLL NG w_w_W_WwU~'2 t 2<FCOCq 2 OI 2< N N YrraO ~ ^r2_4VVJw 22anm 0TlYZN ~'~1-f F¢UWZ WSgwOON J<02NU^»Of 2¢2YhZW~'WN¢OOJOO<WW{ ~ W <6<tf <fwW .V hr pr nn rr lO qYN{ UWtZiNaOn NrOirN ~NNhN ¢22¢2 ¢2¢6222{2¢¢¢¢¢l NUrnNYY P YII wd^PPOWOh•ON 4r 01-NNd^gghY^OYyONti.pN NPhPPNONm ¢ 1 N rPNgbdhONNY00N^NYq.~.yh gmNry q.yw .nP mrn rynPrvNgry 'D NNrmPm d dCNrPOryn .p mYYJNNry^Yryrl Ygrvmmmm mr-W(r1 r Nrv ry ti NNN -~ N N O wy~u~pO ~POp mu.p OWOO n O.-OYV ry m nP V NPNOO WOJOPO nO~o OOOnm ut OOOr nJ n~(~nOrnYmOPONnnmm.On 4i n wO LL~ YJ CvPn t~P.00 ~n U NnnN O n.r .~ .~ .. m .. 0. 3 ; m .. ` u 2 rWnWPO.yNmvr PO-~NmJP.Oh w < n i i i .+N.amuidaNaN °°N.o .a °'n N'°'°NW r 3i mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnmmmmm Y W l ~ i Z L . m 1F 2 Z r r+ .. 4' r P { L~ Ur U fY ¢KC rp'. KOttK w0 w3w 2 Z2~+ .1S O S.~LZ Z m2~ 2u~r Orr p7ti oryUSyn'JU00 UO F m N 2 WW2 _ •W < PW IWW RW PWP !O.'1 O PWy O LUU2 FLOU w0 i ¢ ~ < rrRw xOm P 1 W>rx7 WOOrLLa1 0. m003wuni dw~ w0< w<H2 ~4 O >~n K_ >~n\O Ux "~Zf2 JNV07r~ R Pn uZ ~ O ~ in ?'J wrOr.2 wmx m 62{OUV~I n2 '2 l{< O"R7 0.~zm VV WOVi aVa~ u200~0 < LL 00'- O WN ~Vw '~O SZa.~aL¢ uP ~Z <J iN Q< 00 w<7 0.2mO •Owr w>Y OOr •x JrrFN .-~Z w L .w.~x°iiz.r. r..~°iw.'".i~ iio ~,ri~ O i s Y ' ,..Y »mi a w~. Ja..x~W im~Lws< -- . m z o ~~ ~~" "' .. a LLa .i Zr V n >V OU r WO V OV ~ 2 Z wY < OAK v~~- ~n<y2 Z m < LL ~J 12¢w a - -J < Z OW (L U rnW LL~r<O< O a~ S ~ ~LJnz 2 V1' JrW{mL w' ZZ~+vr >yr2 9zt0 6ur~~uOr ¢LW6~ aZUW z~X O <.~V V~ i~<O~-~ WC p.r 1 ~Y rOw<~00 y V min 2rV3 J w> .u< VxZ>OSV ~ n4'u NOrW22.JU o<u3LL wu~i Sv~% ~ Y>V< LLZVZZ<R rOyF~. < ~ v «rIrJJWLLV imv~WW u2R <w22 nOwwKW¢~W60. «rrr J~nN Z N~^m06 `-1.~< ~J ?>x»>SU~SSSSOVX r ryPYmn PmOgJOFJmvFP J , m LmnOPPW OWPOpYPNmnPPmO O TJ nw m~Ory N.+N 1NNNw NNwvyry Y.OF ~O ~ // I 9y - Sp34SSg ~; .. - m>e.,. .. ... - vi ~ ~ P :=~? g mvma~ md2i ^ °~ °~ eB~;~R3A~~l s i .a~ n ai d °s "a ~_ .e s= _a FB ".SSg2i R" o ~§° s " ~ ~'~ F878o8iR~ - 7 _ !~" s ?a~~^«$'ai~~ s3 of sr a ., iii t8 m~ 'x;ga9i~x ~ aa: a~ns b. xi "s ~ ~ N s ~,~~~~ ~ ar ~~ ~ r cr _: x.ax ~ 3r ~ s 9T~3?~'LdE a ~ x ~ s 3 :E il3 s~I~: sail: 5.~, 3-e~~ _y~_ :3°~3 Y~~t~ s_,~: ea=";i yf-if 3e.~~ ~'a 2~. i3j=E it~i i i K i~ i~ I, li .. ~g i - .. .. --^~'..."'.E$~m2F.?~3'aP..~^._:~n'.x.="_al.^.y"1L:'4-4g..^.Sa==.m,. ° _ °SSYSSSSSS_8tS°~858888SSSS8S888L8LS888SS88LSYii °~j m-9SR~°_^_p_S___a,~._o~T.R~8°-R6 L.°. e_=?-X aF=-.".=35 std='s sss'aa'aas=ae?aassR=3caiavasa's a'a vaasa~3saes ~'~4~ __.~,'~Sat.~-.n~i?~=.P-.~~.~^.~Sry.F aan .~~~ri ~e.:~. L RRBP.RRR88=RRR8RRS81C88RRR8888RRRRRRRRRRRRCRCRB e........s...o.....c diid~: o.c...........>~... 338Reg;S88R8888888858388R8888888888888R888833 $~a~"sas~~8~e~'a~~a~m§8S$~s$g~~~~a~'sa~ssiaa~~~ '~ ff3RSSA-~gSSSY8LBRS8f&88S38FS&SS88aS3ffS&S°SSYo Y ~ ^-^~ ,~- 888,8„-8388888888888888883888888888282838338 ~i ~'a°s~~°"x~°ss°ss°s,~$~~~R#~~~~s~~~~~$'s~~~$a°s °a~~a°s~§~ ",m 533~~a-~&3SCY~YS°y~t %6S_8S88S.&L8SR8LSR3RSY~?2Si~ 5 . "' =~ ,`,,} a388eRr°_8388888888888838888388R83R88R88888888 °, '~ssamg~ean~~ye#s~~a~~~~~~~~~8e~~~°x~88ee~~~~a~~~ ~~ -° S=eB~~^~S3SS£~S&8&8SC88L%RLSSSL888SYF€Y&%SffS3 _ aa~iiYaaY~smsasssssxssaiassai~s~atassiaiRia .. .__.._aee_e~e~va=..a.e°='~o°a°aaaa~a ~ai-a ea~oos~ maax~~bna~99~~y~~g'~i~Kx~~~~~~~d~iee''s~~~~~s=~y~~-'~~~ ~~'' ~~~~s~~~saa~8~~~g~i~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s€~~~~~ /3 " ~ej ..__., x =r~2~~~^baR.~i~°~s:~~=£~=^ssag„s?~~'a ~== B - LL6SS =s'~, °grnn LY8L828L8L888RL[.lSLRf~ni LLLY8LLL82LSLL s~a3'„ag~ag=rs3a~~x=_~~_e=e~=sc_acq_ ' ' ' g ~,~ eBsss a'aeaaassesss ss;:: sesS~s'_Sse_s'ess_as= ill ~~~~a :F?S~~'~1 ~~~.~eFY~r-'~J~lF.~'~C~7~G ..:7LSY~p~.x. .., a .. ,....:...:. .. .a>a. a ..~.,.... '~~~, ~:~~? m §~3f~.RKR#H~513E~~~II~34$~~~i~~$'~~~c9$u~'~~u,~II °8§R~ -a ~g~g~~#$~5~E9~II~~#~~~H$~~$~x~$~R~~~~ ,- .. ~...>... ...... ...>..... .. a __~m.~ 58888 :~: 3SR~~ $ 888858888888888E88888~:8888888888R88 ~~~~~~e~~~g~~~~g~~~~~ns~~~~~~~~~$~e~ r ..I _ &%S.°.S 3 ~ ..____.. .... ................ SSSSSSLSSSSSSl8SSS8SS-^•^8$SSSS88SS8SS8 ' 38888 S 888888888888888888888:8888888888888 Sv: ~4~~8 ? %~~6~$~~~~3'~~~~~~~~~~~F~~~~~~~~a~8S% ~K° ;~ S3S&S y &SSSSS&SSLSSSSBSSSSSSpC~$LS~S88~L82&8 Fe: ~9~ ~I 88888 8 ~~~ $83~~8 B 88888~8888888888888~8~:8888888888888 8~~~~~~~~~~~~~5 ~~~~~~~.~^.?~~~~~~~~~~~~~ &3&SS 8 88S&SSS&€F&GC88SS28L[~A8i5RS89LS88'38 „LLLL ._ ~gl _ `_- 95m3LLL8S8aLLLSSLLLLLLLL £.L ~iBiS°SBLL a~a?'~a$=]a:ra?'s 2. r?33s=segx3sg?s^'„: ` ?d~a ?e?~? ` _ e = ' ' _ __-_~ s e a ss? veas aSs a-a~as aeo sa ~~~ 9$ ~ o~ ~1~Y3 ~~ ~ ~ '~'~~~~~ N~a: ..~~^ mili'~~a~ ...~~ '~33~i3 ~' ~~`~~~ ~ W~6~ "" ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ B ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ _ " x5y~! m ~ N @ 9~ 9 9~1~ ~ ~ a c ~s a gg¢¢ ~ s $$ gg gg a ~i i ~8D~$$ qq pp 33 gg¢g gg 3~E$C$$~5~~~$i~I~~i8~~~~8~$~$lE~II$Y~$1` . 8= ~ ° sa~ ° :5S5SL552&SSLL5S5SS58& - a~a_~r??3d'a??dds~s_ ` ` ' ` ` ` S55 a~a ^^>5SS8S8s _=s~an~? ' ` ~ ! 5 ac c scs sSg a s a ass3s?a°-s sas aaa s3. s s ~~~f~RB~H~~~H~~~~~~~~~ S S &S. R S~^xYPSS mu>~v e~~:d:d~ : s a ~~va~~:~ t:x ~~gg8$$gRgg~~$8R$$88 S 83r 4R8RR;s8 N3~~ 8888888888888888889288 ~ R S~~ 3 ~ 88888888 e~~~~~~~~~ ~~~8~~88~~~ ~ ~ F$~ Xex~B%3~ s ~! 3RS3Y%&i8&%C8SS8&SR%oS q ~ 0~8 ~ ~~ego-a88 T S 8338838dd888888888888883 83~88~~8~~8988~~~~~~g8 8 •„ ~ 388 ~8~ ~ 88888883 ~$~8~R~8 8 ~v m ' L`I _8&8t8at8iSS%&8'3588%&F ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~ 5 ~_~ tl6 8888888888888388888888 .R s %8888888 _ ~ ~~888~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~ n 8 ~8m ~ ~~~~x~~~ - ' 358585585SS85588888L5 „^ ~ Sig a ~~$e~$~~ 'r 3 ~ g ~, 88888YS5Sl88s8SaS9SSSS ~9q `?.m~S s3'a R3°°~R3«4°- S8S ~_ 3886959 e_° g n ~ Q er ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~.,~~ ~ ~1 ~~ N~~~~B~~~~~r=~~ ~~~y~5~ S~ E~ 9ii 3~~W~~~~~ W ~j ~=a~~ ~~~:y siG°~~ ~~ ~ a4e'e~~m~~~a~~~~~~~~s~~y ~ ~ y ~ ~a~= ~ ~ n ~ 3 ~~~"r~~~ ~ a psi s ~ ~ i a ~~ ~#~E~ ~ ~ s a ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~$ ~ ~ ~s~~~~ ~ ~ ! ~aB ~ ~ $~~ ~ e e ~ ~ ~~ /~ g^g _ .. ~~.~'.3 °' SSL S -' e n jai ~;,~, ~ _ ~ X83 ~ effoS B SI tl ' ~^O ...ms a 7~~x• msmm R ~ e - ryl B ~k~ s..s m v:~w ~ v R a °.e 1 3888 ~ :mp m ud. p ~ 5~' °%:. a ~gRR .°, $ j X ' ~S° `m 8K'S~S $ a ~. ~ ~; Bye a m 4°ay $ a: _ ~~' ~'~~, $3s s aa:c a s 3 spa - ~$x % a a?u n $ ~! a X~I 3r~ - ga .n°$ 8 ~~I 2~~ a„ =~ a :a~a a a a ms a s ~~= ;;oe ~~ ~ ~ a ~ ~~ s~ ~ a :. _ N~$m ' x ~ "y~~~ ~ of ~ ~~~$ ~ ~~" ~~ ~ ~ ~n~~ ~ W~ ~ea.' ~ -~ a ~ A ; ~ ~W~ ~ ~~ ~~a~ ~ ~~ ~ v G pp 9 y _ ~ gy ~~ ~ gg ag$q ~ $ J S ~ '-~ ~~8~ ~~ ¢ ~8Y8E ~$ ~~ y ;~; ae, ~~{ ! C y IRI I S ~~ G I X: P k: ~ $$ ' ~ a T ~~: R y~ ~ i 4_: ~~~ ~ ~d~ k _' e" IC 3 n i _ ; _ _, x ~~ ~i a ~~ '~- £ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ F ~ as r ~a I~ E y 3~ is a° i~ _ `g X, s$ .F F'~ ^ ... ~Y~v ~~', ~~~ °~ ~~~ ~ ' ~~ 6 a £ ~ a c 88 Fn 88 $$ g S $~ R; ~° lYR ^. 8 .R, ~8t 8 S L ~ ^~ 38 ~ "~3 8 ~SAr ~ ~ ~$S ~ $ - ~ ~S ~8 ~ 3y°. X B ~ ~ ~ n $ ~ A:.! 8 8 s8 8 8 s S R vaL ~ ~ ?$ ~ ~ A 8 A ~iSiiii iiiiiiii i iii 333338'SE a'a 'aaaaaa E ee3 ~~~~~~ aaaaaa»~ ~~• ~ a ~ 9 ~ v ~ ~ -- x g v a E ~ ~p 4 3g ~ a~~g~$~A~ y T~~$~~Ya$ » ~E ~$ y8 ~ ~i3f y ~ ~ ~ 9 s ~ ~ m es sa as - s xx sa; Fe 0 w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q~ ~_; y v r ~ cl~s S v r ~~ 'a `- a s : at G t g 0 a ~^ ~ ~~~ a e ra ai ~ °a v- a ~y- ' z yS g:~ = J ~I~S ~$'~ a Yi fW~ $a 'J~m ~i tl~ i 3 d g r G `~~Yl ~' Y ~a~7 n: ~ ~"~ ~ ~~~~~ a i N "~ ~ n ~d ~ 3 ~i - = ~ a ~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _s 19 AMIKAlM4M NN A1CO11(11K NVQAG LKENtE1Sl 1, 9YPE;11 Of LI<ENSN51 illE NO. ter DnpOHrnrrn of Akvbdi Evrro9r Cmnd CII Li.6 Rml R MIA RECEIrt NO. 1901 Brood.q SL Bl~D1M0 Sa,v ,. y CdE 9301 EA}IMC ty[CM ~ 119865 r r , . 8 I IGEOGRA/NMi4 ,.r•.....«.w '°'° ee.r CODE 3611 IM1r uMro9«d M.rbi epPli» la Dvt. linrrr.rr dwrrbN an b0on: luod }. NAMEIS) Of AnLIUNlIS; irmP vwmn A9PFrd _drr Srr. ]IDY ^ Eflr[E« Oaa In0uPC. Eflrtn.r Do»~, 1. ttvF,31 OF lRANL.CTON(Si fET[ llt nRE l __ ~ __ Nr. bt. i SIS0. oD -~_ ~ U R: 11 _ _~ ___.__ _ ~ _ _~~ A Nemr vl Buunru ' 961! /oo[oA 11 Blvtl. .Lmb Cucmry~, 91910 Su, D~iu[dlm '. iOLA: i 11D. W ' A Ir /remrM lr»,rrrd. ) Arn prnmr», In,dn ~~ SM. iypr vl Uon» Q-11650] Gry Lmrryp YY e, Malrq Addnu irl drflerml Iran !I-Numbs and Lr.x ~ --~ ~--- r..e •- 9 Hev. you rrrr been aon.rt»d al o INmyi 10. Hwr yeu .v .rdaHd anY el ,br pr0.aon. of IcoboM1a Brwroq <vnhd 4t w rgvbfiom of rno Drpenmrv pnn arnap ro H. Aq0 i.r _ I1 F.plarn n "YES" ae,wer p ibmr 0 w 10 on vn vMULm.m .brd ,M1all br bwmrd pxr W rFn vpvlrtepvn AppL[ r q•ren Iv rlw, a r.npbyed i ule ' ,J' on ,En vwl.r,,, o! a Ls. and L InnteA..rrll rol . _ pwmn q W nvln»d vny vl ,M1.~por alFrF. Alrobelie Mrero9. Con rol An I] SIAIF Of UIIPORNIA Cowry al __yr-~~tA _______________Delp... y/#)/99-- 4 ~.m _ .. r..r....nr...~ n n....-... .... a• r .ur.,.... . r.... a ~r. y wn.. .. , n. '1 ~APPIIUNE....~~..... .r .. ~.~«.n.. ,... r. _,.w..• e.. w ... ...x...~~. .. ...... ~. .r. .n. . r ,. . AGN HERO - "_ ,,E,/~' ~/~,~~///~" `~ .^'.. _iE..S lyre--"ira".(sd.~ ~.-r.. ~_.__. ../J~ r le ... ... ......... ........ .. _.._ •-~IICATItDN 0Y TRAN31EI1011 Is sutE of UpfORNIA comh e1 ...4N1_CJ0.IMIDSRt.__... .-__Do»...._ VAll B.4... -- .. ,~ ...... ~..... -... ...rr,Y r...., .. ,. o....... > vemn r er ea„n.r. v si9nnm,n,~ er ,rt.n...lD IB Lrtnn,. N„mbrr',~ _ ~wal~siiv-- __._ .. ..-_~'1-._-_- __~.-~.. __.__._.a11~1..1 .__ _ pADPJLS$ydSD1SP1111_._ -.._.__ __-t--..__~_.._~~___._._ ~'' . ._._. .._.__._. _ _.. .__.__...._-_ ___.._____._.._ ____ _. __t_- .__. _. _ -. __._.._ ._.. . -_ _._. _i...._ ...__..-_._.___., ___._.. ____ _..._. ___ ____ Iv lacanan N~mL.. and Shan Gry and Z'"p Code <ounq Dn Vnl Wntr Brlnm iM1U l.u,e. Fn• Drrvrrrmrm LYr Only Anatnrd "' Recorded +onw. .1 fdoavo evwn. .` e.xr, (r ..~..!. ._(ORIEl MAIIED.. /1)I3Y ._ Rrm.d in of raid d... . . OTrr en ...... .. .. Rrnnpt Ne ........ . ..... -'~:: ROCKY'S KEM YORK STYLE PIZZERIA -9615 FOOTHILL BOULEYARD ~~ CUCAMONGA' ~' 91730 APH~208-261-52 Presently located in the Foothill Blvd Specific Plan, Planning Sub-area 3 Carnnercial/Office Zoning of ad,Iacent properties; R th• F thill 5 fi P i i~ Vii, !f" ;y- 563 a y565 t-" -. . Y u a 9~i67 f~ l 9569 or oo peci c loon ng Sub- ~pOTHllI. RLVOr area /3 Special Coanerlctal ) South: Low Residential Zone Lasl : I'uulblll 5lxtiaflc Pidnnhn~ Sub- area /3 Special Coa>aerciat Hest : Foothill Specific Planning Sub- area w3 Canaerical Office ~ ~ yfi03 I yfi05 ~ O(i119 I Oh I I f 9613 ~ ~ ~ yfil-- q -I 962} 965 J- - nNlrllu II Id+M3 of ,t~ . u nu ~ dNNP f i COPY APR 2 0 ;pap ~..~ +.mM. mM...Nro.E....w.,~r_.~.....mm.....~ fffllC~TEOM NM AlCO1g11D N1EOADf EKBfflEfl I. IYIH51 Of IICEN5f15) HlE NO. Iw DR9Rr1mRIY M AfxldiR fRr~opR Cannd RE Elpi . 1401 4evdwm ~ r. SenammYO, Cuff. 95fIB ~ f9[urdLn ON 9AL6 ffEf f YItl6 «..rw.....r...«.•w.. J.1ITIHG TLACf CODE 1 IM undR•vf(M A«.61 uPPMR b Dew _ liavnEe( dsnb.d m fefe.u lewd ]. NAA1E(51 Or ArfllGw*I5) iMp. I«mn Appfd urda Sm. 3E04 u0I!.ISV, eL 91 Efmfw Dow: SR El1r<~.. Dme: :. iYPF(5) OF iRAN5ACT10N(51 iEF LK. IYK S YeY 1 r ~ 198 QJ~_ CT 30 I 1. Nerve of buwnw rRCO races 5. lavli0n of Rwn.u-NumMr aM SnM ~ I _ I 3]99-A Baw11nR ~ -- i -y ~~~ [rry and Lp CedR Cwmry y I RAacm lcavoew 91]JO fYe eRrnArfm I rDIAE 1f8.00 l 0. rr n mw( 4r(«•W, ]. An P•.mrw In1.W SMw rY9E OE li(RmR Ciry liming R Malip Add.RV li! diR«.m Aan SI-Nlmba and ShM r.,r. r...l RiRR)lmD[dn1 Y. I,~m9 - 190 9 Mere you n« b.m <m•i<wd d a f.lwryt 10 Na•e yes n« waloM anY W N•e pro•~uwn of IM AI<aRdk Mv«aq Cannd An w rpuM' f Me DRpomm~l p«- _~~ lan.ep b M. A<IT I I E•plain v "YES" amw« ro II«m 9 w 10 en an anwbm«n wbr<M1 Mall M dmmd Wrr of Ibn oppMvuov. ay.,lr.arrl w ••+ (~i IMI a e...yw p:..t.d i. ..d w.^• e.i r . qwb. e I < v rbl rbm M will nel ddew w <mw w p«md N M dakwd mY al lM perruonE rd IM A<oAdi< M•«apR <annol An'"« Il STAtE Of GIIEMNIA Cwmy el .....$r.f1RRnRdRdm._._......___Daw.._J/.14/89__...___. .w- n ..N..rx .. • ~rN-• -,~yw x+ nrrvw ~w rw . r.rcri ...P ....r .r ,.... „„.• n . b .r .rrr.,w.~ r r e . rnrv.+.~r fi ~ .y ,..r. . .. r..w.. rn.rr... . .. I(~APPIICANf•~•r.rr,e ,v.~ti ~• ~ .~~x~r~..u~~~e..r..~r.r.r...r. .r ....... _,n .. ....r ~.r .ri~r.• SrGN NEiE ._.__...~~i`~Y~LC~f-;[LS lJ ............................. •r .... y ................. ...... . .h ......................................... ___..___ . ..._.................................... _._____. -'_... -- - AMIN:ATION ~T iRANMl10l ~ ~---__ `5 5]Alf Of CAIIEORNIA <wnry d ...................................... Dan ..........._. ____ __.__ ~.w,. r9 Locanan Nvmb« and SbM Crry aM Lp Cod. County Dn Vnl Wnw Brlmo iAu 6inE: Fm Drjwrtmenl Cw Only AM<Aed~, _ v«orded naYw. \ ~ 1 ^ Ndunery pepem. vL '~ ...................... e...r. ......._...._... ..._COHfS MAIIED... ........ Q/tt/E9......... ............ -bm.el fwol_..__...JeH a_._._~ __._..___.. _ORi<Ren ........... ......R«Npl Ne. ...................... -----------~1Set.tNE-' -- ---, 909 i 9759 ~I TRCO FACTORY 9799 "R" BASELINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 APN @ 1077 O11 49 Business presently located in a Neighborhood Conmericial Zone Zoning of adjacent properties: North: Neighborhood Commericial/ Medium/High Residential South: Low Residential East 7eighborhood Conmerical / Low/Medium Residential West : Low Residential Alhertson's Mkt -i?F3 YRI I47~.i ~ 99'3 _ __ - I. _~~5 - -, ... _ 47,9 978,9 TOCO FACTORY ~9 ~~ joe torrez 24 Apr 1989 N CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Junior Civil Engineer _~ SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Protect aL the Intersections of Base Line Road and Ramona Avenue (Account No. 12-4637-8826), Base Line Road and Valencia (Account No. 12-4637-8827) and Haven Avenue and Victoria Street (Account No. 12-4631-8832) TDA Article 8 Funds It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at Haven Avenue and Victoria Street, Base Line Road and Ramona Avenue and Base Line Road and Valencia and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The sub,)ect project plans and specifications have been completed by B.S.I. Consultants, Inc., reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is 5180,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for May 9 and 16, 1989, with the bid opening at June 8, 1989. ResD ub~itted, r r RH . Attachment RESOLUTION N0. ~9' /~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY ; LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AT THE INTERSECTION5.0F BASE LINE ROAD AND RAMONA AVENUE, BASE LINE ROAJJ)/AND VALENCIA AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE AND VICTORIA TREET", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND OIRECTI NG,dFIE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS. NHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Project at the intersections of Base Line Road and Ramona Avenue, Base Line Road and Valencia Avenue and Haven Avenue and Victoria Street". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proDOSats for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall 6e substantially in the following words and figures, to wTt: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED B1D5 OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P. M. on the 8 day of June 1989, sealed bids or proposals for the "Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Protect at the intersections of Base Line Road and Ramona Avenue, Base Line Road and Valencia Avenue and Haven Avenue and Victoria Street" in said Ctty. Bids wtil be opened and publicly read Tmnedtately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, Caiifornia. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting Improvement Pro,iect at the intersections of Base Line Road and Ramona Avenue, Base Line Road and Valencia Avenue and Haven Avenue and Victoria Street". PREVAILING NAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provTSTOns of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor Ts required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character to the locality 1n which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency al se shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as Denaliy to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1771.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly Indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions to Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices Dy Lhe Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the aoorenti ceshlo oroaram in that trade fer a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used 1n the performance of the contract, The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. Nhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. Nhen Lhe number of apprentices in training Tn the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Nhen the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership Lhrough apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. Mhen the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs 1f he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works 151te are making such contributions. d~ The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1177.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its bra nth offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed Tn the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 1, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended, The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Lwenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (B) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined Tn the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (109:) of the amount, of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the ornnnceA r~ntrart if tAe town i< awarnaA to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall booms the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest 6l rider, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1008) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (50'b) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordante with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of f15.00, said f15.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of f10.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonaa. California. Dated this day of 19 PASSED AND ADOPTED by Lhe Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, thi; day of 19 yor ATTEST: y er ADVERTISE ON -~8 rn~rv nc o w wrrwn ~ r r~ n vnw:r w STAFF REPORT BATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Junior Civii Engineer SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Slurry Seal Prograq 1988-89 Phase I, Various Street locations, laprovealent Project, to be funded fra~n Gas Tax 2107 Acct. 09-4637-8816 It is recoaaw:nded that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Slurry Seal Prograal 1988-89 Phase I, Yarlous Street locations, iaproveaient Project and approve Lhe attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting B1ds". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been coalpleted by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's esttawte for rnn<}nurfinn ie tN6 nM lanai aAvnnH einn 1< e~hnAyl nA fnw May 0 anA May 16, 1989, with the bid opening at May 18, 1988, 10:00 A.MI. ResD subn~ltted, i . M Attachalent .~9 RESOLUTION N0. (~- /~ 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM 1988-89 PHASE I, VARIOUS STREETS", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIOS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications Dresented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Slurry Seal Program 1988-89 Phase [, Various Streets". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wt t: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE tS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 10;00 o'clock A. M. on the 18 ddy of May 1989, sealed bids or proposals for the "Slurry Seal Program 1988-89 Phase I, Various Streets" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read imcediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "BTd for Construction of Slurry Seal Program 1988-89 Phase 1, Various Streets". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Oivislon 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles l and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general preva111ng rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work, in that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file 1n the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested 3~ party on request. The Contracting Agency also shalt cause a copy of such determinations to be Dosted at the job site. The Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1177.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed in the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Sectivn 1171.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program to that trade for a certificate of approvai. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemolovment in the area of coveraa_e by the ioi nt aoorenti ceshio committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions W funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1177.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, 3( ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (f25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight 18) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the nark required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773,8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (lOt) of the amount of Bald bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, ar bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the Dond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (1005) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to fifty percent (508) of the contract price for said nark shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has not been Issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the previsions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time Lime this contract Ts awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon aPDlicatian to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 535.00, said f35.OC 1s nonrefundaDi e. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of f20.00 to cover Lhe cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and SDecifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and azpense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this daffy of 1984. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, this day of 1989. or ATTEST: y er ADVERTISE ON MAY 9, 1989 MAY 16, 1989 33 CIxY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Junior Civil Engineer ~._~. ~: SUBJECT: Authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Improvement of Feran Boulevard, from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from CD86 Funds 28-4333-8194 it is recoamended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Improvement of Feron Boulevard, from Ramona Avenue to Hernwsa Avenue and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans oral specifications have been completed by GPS 8 Associates, reviewed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is (77,856.00. Legal advertising is .r hnAulnA inw N"" a "nA Yav 1F taGa uilh fM hiA roM n~ "t June 8, 1989, 2:00 P. M. Resp ffil>',y submitted, /. ~~ NM:LB' Attachment 3`~ RESOLUTION N0. ~9- / 9C/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "IMPROVEMEN? OF FERON BOULEVARD, FROM RAMONA AVENUE TO HERMOSA AVENUE", iN SAID C[TY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO gDVERTI SE TO RECEIYE BIDS. WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREDY RESOLVES that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specificatfons for "Improvement of Feron Boulevard, from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk fn the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 o'clock P.M. on the 8 day of June 1989, sealed bids or proposals for the "Improvement of Feron Boulevard, from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue" in said City. Bids will be opened and publicly read immediately in the office of the City Clerk, 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Improvement of Feron Boulevard, from Ramona Avenue to Hermosa Avenue". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a 5lmiiar character Tn the locality in which the public work 15 performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Otrector of the Department of Industrial Rotations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 Base Line Road, 35 Suite C, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. The Contractor shalt forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Menty-five dollars (f25.DC) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman, or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code as amended by Chapter 971, Statutes of 1939, and in accordance with the regulations of the California apprenticeship Council, properly indentured apprentices may be employed to the prosecution of the work. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1711.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777,5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticeable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program 1n that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will he used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. Mhen unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent to the 90 days prior to the request for certificate, or D. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. Nhen the trade can show that tt is replacing at least 1/30 of its memDersM p through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, ar D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticeable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1771.6 1n the employment of apprentices. 3~ Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (R) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty W the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars (525.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, far each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (R) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay W each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreements filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773,8. The bidder must submit with his proposal cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable W the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at feast ten percent (108) of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same 15 awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, raehi nr'c rhor4 rorH fisA rhx4 nr hood ehall h<rrune iho nrnnar4_v of 4ha City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, tf any, shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (IOOf) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal W fifty percent (508) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted W be done by the Contractor, ar any work or tabor oP any kind done Lhereon, and Lhe Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carri e5 COmpenSd tipO insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor whom a proposal form has r.ot been issued Dy the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ContracWr shall possess a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provlstons of the Contractor's License Law 37 !California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto at the time time this contract is awarded. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 9320 Base Ltne Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of 535.00, said 535.00 is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of (20.00 to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 902 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to re,)ect any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this day of 1989. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this day of 1989. or ATTEST: city cierx ADVERTISE ON MAY 9, 1989 MAY 16, 1989 3g CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Countll and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer ~= SUBJECT: Approval and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with J. F. Davidson and Associates, to prepare Landscape Improvement and Renovation Plans for the east side parkway of Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road for a fee not to exceed 517,270.00 to be funded from the Beautification Fund, Account No. 21-4647-8722 along with an additional 10% contingency allowance to be established for use under the approval of the City Engineer. RECOUEIOATIOM• Approval and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with J. F. Davidson and Associates, to prepare Landscape Improvement and Renovation Plans for the east side parkway of Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road for a fee not to exceed 517,270.00 to be funded from Lhe Beautification Fund, Account No. 21-4647-8722 along with an additional 10% contingency allowance to be established for use under the approval of the City Engineer. BACK6ilOlllq/AML TS I S The deveiopment known as the Rochester Tract has, since City incorporation, been deficient in parkway improvements along Rochester Avenue. This area has been a concern for installations and reconstruction of unsightly portions for some time due to deterioration and damage. The Intent is to bring the entire area into conformance with current City Standards for landscape, hardscape and irrigation. Thereafter, to include the area in the ongoing City maintenance activities. Res y submitted, R ~:pNh!'MD" am .39 l~TTV /1C D A l.i l~Cll1 /~l 1/~ 11l /~f i/~ , STAFF REPORT ~ DATE: Mdy 3, 1989 ~~ T0: City Council and City Manager - FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Mike Dlivier, Senior Civil Engineer ', SUBJECT: Approval and execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Oon Greek and Associates to prepare design plans, specifications and estimates for the re-opening of Highland Avenue between Haven Avenue and San Benito Avenue with a connection between Highland Avenue and 19th Street at San Benito Avenue and providing three lanes of traffic each direction with a temporary median Island on Haven Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue, for a fee not to exceed 523,632.00 to be funded from the Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8852. RECOMMENDATION: Approval and execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Don Greek and Associates to prepare design plans, specifications and estimates for the re- opening of Highland Avenue between Maven Avenue and San Benito Avenue with a connection between Highland Avenue and 19th Street at San Benito Avenue and providing three lanes of traffic each direction with a temporary median island on Haven Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue, for a fee not to exceed 523,632.00 to be funded from the Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8857. BACKGR.OUMD/ANALYSIS• On April 19, 1989 City Council approved Figure 3 of Staff Report dated April 19, 1989 (attached). The consulting firm of Oon Greek and Associates has been contracted to prepare plans, specifications and estimates for the civil engineering work to re-open Highland Avenue from Haven Avenue easterly to San Benito Avenue with a connection between Highland Avenue and 19th Street at San Benito Avenue. In the reach of Haven Avenue between 19th Street and Highland Avenue a design will be prepared that provides 3 lanes of traffic in each direction with a temporary median Island. Negotiations are presently going on with the firm of Austin Foust and Associates to re-stugy the traffic circulation within the sub,)ect area and prepare and process documents, plans, permits and related General Plan Amendment necessary to re-open Highland Avenue. Both the civil design and the traffic design work will require simultaneous processing with Cal trans. Respectfglly submitted, i RHM:MO:pam Attachment ~D CITY OF RANCHO CliCAiVIONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 19, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: .19th Street connection to Highland Avenue RECOMMENDATION ..~:: ~~ ~a~ 9'r .F It is recommended that Lhe Council consider all input and should the Council decide to re-open Highland Avenue between Haven Avenue and the subject connectfon, that staff be directed to prepare and process documents, plans, permits and related General Plan Amendment necessary to accomplish that re-opening. BACKGROUND: The plan for the 19th Street/Highland Avenue connectfon was developed by San Bernardino County and Caltrans prior to incorporation of the City, and the first half of the route was built prior to 1978. The City's General Plan adopted this realignment of State Route 30 along with the alignment of the future Route 30 freeway and has shown this routing for 19th Street/Highland Avenue for the Dast 8 .years. The General Plan also designates Highland Avenue as a collector street to be used as a frontage road when the Route 30 freeway is built. This designation was made so that Highland Avenue east of Deer Creek could be converted to a divided City street, similar to Haven Avenue, if Route 30 freeway were not built. Nineteenth StreeC was recognized as important to the City's overail circulation and established as a priority street by the City Council in 1986. Nineteenth Street is an element of a system of important east-west arterials needed prior to the construction of the Route 30 freeway. The City's circulation program directs improvements to four lanes for 19th Street wes4 of Haven Avenue with the addition of signals at spectfted locations and an efficient connection to Highland Avenue. Rs development in the area and 19th Street Itself proceeded east, this connection was implemented. This improvement is only one of several important projects that are proceeding far the implementation of a long term circulation system in this area. This circulation plan calls for improvement of Lemon Avenue east of Naven Avenue and through to Highland Avenue at Oeer Creek; extension of Banyan Street east from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue; extension of Milliken Avenue to Foothill Boulevard and widening of 19th Street to 4 lanes from Carnelian Street to Haven Avenue. ~/ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 19TH STREET CONNECTION TO HIGHLAND AYENUE APRIL 19, 1989 PAGE 2 This overall network is more needed now, prior to Foothill Freeway construction, than after the freeway is a reality. Analysts of Existing Clrcul ation: 1. As currently operating, the connection replaces a portion of Route 30 where its intersection with Haven Avenue had exceeded existing capacity. The deficiencies at that intersection are a lack of street width for left- turn lanes for east and westbound traffic and a lack of left-turn signals for all directions. Operational and safety problems at the intersection were being experienced. Similar though lesser needs are present at the 19th and Haven intersection but construction is now under way for the needed improvements. Such improvements were necessary even without the closure of Highland Avenue and had been planned for construction at this time. The closure of Highland Avenue between Haven Avenue and the new connection was a final part of the current development project on the south side of 19th Street at the new connection. The new connection and particularly the closure of Highland caused several complaints by area residents, mostly from newly occupied houses. In addition to complaints regarding heavy traffic, noise, difficulty of using the intersections and v15ib111ty at intersections, there were many claims that insufficient notice was given by the developer of the impact of making the connection to Highland or that the information that was given was misleading. in commenting on these concerns, it should 6e noted that while the traffic volume increase did nappen, it was plannea ror in the aesrgn or 19th Street and covered in the environmental reviews for the General Plan and the adjacent development protects. The delay experienced in entering 19th Street is greatly different because the street is no longer a dead-end. This naturally caused an initial shock to users. intersection safety, however, has not been compromised. A letter (attached) distributed 6y the Nindsong developers states, "The result, if approved, will be to make 19th Street a continuation of California Highway 30." This clearly indicates that State Route traffic would De traveling an 19th Street. Other concerns of safety voiced Dy residents will be addressed by improvements at the Haven Avenue and 19th Street 9ntersectton. These will involve a new signal providing for separate left-turn phases, elimination of abrupt dips and a southbound left-turn lane. This intersection work 1s under way and would have begun long ago but for Cal trans' permit issuance. ~v CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT 19TH STREET CONNECTION TO HIGHLAND AVENUE APRIL 19, 1989 PAGE 3 Future Area Circulation: A major concern has been expressed that Highland Avenue should be kept open to carry Chaffey College and shopping center traffic which now must use 19th Street all the way Le Haven Avenue. Th15 concern wilt also be addressed in the near future. A connection between Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue is required as part of a subdivision which is to be built shortly between Highland Avenue and Lemon Avenue west of Deer Creek. This connection should be available in 12 to 18 months and will provide a route to Chaffey College and the shopping center removing that portion of traffic from 19th Street. This connection will require a traffic signal at its intersection with Highland Avenue and the intersection will remain in place even after the freeway is built. The developer of this subdivision will also be~requlred to widen the Deer Creek Bridge and build turn lanes so that this intersection will operate safely. Nithin the same time period, Banyan Street will be extended across Deer Creek to Milliken Avenue, gluing college and commuter traffic a more direct route to the east. In the near future, another shopping center in Vittoria will open at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue. This center will further reduce westbound traffic on Highland Avenue and 19th Street. Nithin the next few months, again dependent of issuance of Caitrans' permit to the Lyon Company, Milliken Avenue will be completed between Highland Avenue an6 Base Line Road. Much of the traffic now using 19th Street io Haven Avenue will then be able to go south to Base Line Road and shortly thereafter all the way to Foothill Boulevard (eventually to Route 30) further reducing traffic on 19th Street (Figure 4). Options for Re-opening Highland Avenue: Given the concerns about short-term problems ezpertenced prior to the canpletlon of the network of improvements, the re-opening of Highland Avenue to provide a shorter route to the shopping center and access to northeriy areas via Haven Avenue could be done in various ways. The most probable connections are shown in Figures 2 and 3. The net effect of such connections rrould be the routing of about one-third to one-half of the traffic from this part of 19th Street until Lemon and Banyan are constructed (12-18 months). ~3 CITY COUNC [L STAFF REPORT 19TH STREET CONNECTION TO HIGHLAND AVENUE APRIL 19, 1989 PAGE 4 A key player, since the 19th/Highland alignment is within the influence of :~ the State, is Caltrans who, by control of all work on this route, has been the cause of delays in completing key portions of the network improvements and is not in agreement with requested controls at the connection shown in Figure 2 and has voiced concerns regarding the configuration shown in Figure 3. SUMMARY: The new street configuration serves the purpose intended for 19th Street, as expressed in past planning and recent implementation of circulation goals. It does so safely and eliminates overloading on a critical portion of Haven Avenue. In the very near future, improvements will be completed which will greatly enhance the intersection at Haven Avenue reducing traffic backups which have contributed to many concerns. Further reductions of traffic will be caused by the opening of Milliken Avenue, Banyan Street and the connection to Lemon Avenue. Respec bmttted, H :P~~/ ~ / Attachments cc: Public Safety Commission ~~ ~< ;~ ~ QV _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._..._._..._._._ \ ~ Z ~s~ w Y c ,~, ;~ ~ ~g @ .~ y W Y• < W I r I • j ~ I I $ i C C ~_ ~ ]2 f/ O Z 2aY L ~; W i I .~ ; I Q W a ~ N 6~ N LLW C a ~ II ~ o~g~ ~Q3~~W=~~~ i II v ~~d~5 •~~_ • ~ ' E-- ._ €_ II I y€ ( L --,- II ~ E I( e f I :I ~ ~ I ~ ; •u.r .nes I ....r. II .I II i ; ,'....,~ _; _ II W I ~ ,.,,,., { I I II .,. ,.W ~ I o..,.:,r I ~ = I ~I ......._...... I ~ ~ it ~.,.a i II ~ `.,......: j u r, u . ..... i_._____J vl s a,~~aarS 11 ~~.- r + a`r` ^I Y c ~ II ~~ 5 q ` .e,7 . ~.ows'.~. ~~ .' a J L -F v_ 1 y ~- a \ ~ C 1- In/VN.OW `°jn f-n~ ~- w a w Q > a Q J a ~o a~ ~~ U £w d w J tii ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i l 1 r'~ ~ .LHnp}__ g. ~ r' ~ '.. ^.J„ '+S ro brl , ~. J.t , 1 1 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCANfONGA Gro ~CCn,Hq^ ; < ~G' n _~ -~?r '- i_..,o.J! I, ~ ~ ..\ c'. ..III ~ `~ Z ~'I i U IBS \\ : yr ~s~c.E 1W7 I~\ ^~ ~ f.~ Ory \ _~ ~' ~ ,. ~ ~q r 1 w ~ ` 6 I ~,~3b~ \ b 7 s ;o - -~ w~' Y ~ ~/ Z / a ~E' ~ i' fly' _ a~~ P ',. f ~, ~ ,.' 1 -~~\'~~ s ego ~~ \ ~-- a~ ~d ~^ '.e; s ~ P, .' \ d' v C .• >~ ~~ -- ~ ~_~~~ _~ ai ~~=I '_= _ ~_ -____ _ ~, i __ _ .~~~- ~L __ - -_ _ I r...s~ u CITY OF P.AitiCHO CUCA~]ON GA c~c~~r.;, l u I I I II - ^ I r° ~, ~~ ~ III i ~ ~ ~ ~' I ~ G`~ ~I ; r ~ ~ . !> ~ I I .µ --../ - W c~ I rl Iii III 3A1/ dilliW I~~ ~' oi; n,mv no n w wrnvn nr rn . ,rnnrn . STAFF REPORT GATE: Maly 3, 1989 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Bob Zetterberg, Acting Maintenance Superintendent ~7 SUBJECT: Approve execution of lease renewal with the State of California, Department of Transportation, for property on the west side of Beryl Street between 19th aid 20th Streets, Parcel 4223-001-05 RECOMIEIDATIOM: It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a lease renewal with the State of California, Department of Transportation, for property on the west side of Beryl Street between 19th and 20th Streets, Parcel 4223-001-05. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The current lease for this parcel of land was signed in June of 1984, and expired April 1, 1989. The State of California Department of Transpuria cion has indica ced its wiiiingness w enter Into a new o year lease agreement. There wilt be no cost to the Ctty for this lease. This parcel of land Ts the area south of Beryl Park and is used to transfer disposable materials that are generated by the maintenance section during it's day-to-day operations. ---- ~~ ~~ Respectf y s bmitted, _>. , ~~_ ~.. NM:BZ;~f ~9 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mqy 3, 1989 .~~ T0: City Council and City Manager fROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civic Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Base Line Road Parkway Beautification Improvement Protect from the west City Limits to Carnelian Street awarded to Gateway Construction Incorporated for the amount of 5103,124.00 (93,749.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Beautification funds Account No. 21-4647-8793 RECOMMENOATIOM: It is reconwended that City Council authorize the Mayor and CttY Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Base Line Road Parkway Beautification Impravea~ent Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend ;103,124.00, (;93,749.00 plus lOX contingency) to be funded from Beautification funds Account No. 21-4647-8793. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On April 5, 1989, City Council awarded the subfect pro,lect to Gateway Construction Incorporated. Staff has received the executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed Lhem and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respgl;tf ~bmitted, j//~lf I /~ ._ nnil'LB„ly~ cc: Purchasing - CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Jeff Barnes, Mai nt. Supervisor Landscaping b Parks ~, SUBJECT: Participation in the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Departalent Nork Release Program Background/Malysis The Engineering Maintenance Section has completed processing the usage, contractual and insurance requirements of the Mork Release Program, and has found it to be a viable program for our needs. The program will be used to supplement Parks / Street Programs otherwise neglected due to tack of staffing. These activities will be labor intensive such as weeding the slopes at Red Hill Park, replanting landscaped areas, helping in a Tree Replacement Program and repainting park rest rooms. Tha Ctrwet Sa:tinn wi 17 utilize people from this ornaram to Iwlo in clearing weeds and removal of trash and debris from city right-of-wt~%s. Me are estimating an initial 15 people to start with and then increase as needed. Resp ~ s ed, /. ~ -~ RHM: :s m -- CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City CouncTt and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Gary M. Sheu, Assistant Civil Engineer ~~'~ SUBJECT: SUMMARY VACATION OF A UNUSED LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT - A request to vacate a landscape maintenance i easement between Wheaton Court and the Southern Pacific Railroad's right-of-way, located west of Milliken Avenue and north of Base Line Road - APN:202-891-38 b 39 RECOMEMOATIOW: It is recommended that the City Council adopted the attached resolution approving the vacation of a landscape maintenance access easement and authorize City Clerk to record same. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The City has received a request from two property owners on Wheaton Court located west of Milliken Avenue and north of Base Line Road, to vacate an unused Landscape Maintenance Access Easement. The Landscape Maintenance Access Easement was dedicated to the City on Tract Mep 13060 which was approved by City Council on August 6, 1986, to be used for access to the landscaped area along the Southern Pacific Railroad's right-of-way. Two additional accesses to the landscaped area have been provided in close proximity which results Tn the sub,{ect easement being unnecessary. The subJect access has never been improved, and currently there is a wall between the access easement and the Southern Pacific Railroads right-of-way. The owners of the property that this easement crosses have requested that the easement now be vacated. Section 8333 of the Streets and Highways Code states that local agencies may summarily vacate a public service easement if the dedication is less than five years and more than one year, and the easement was not used continuously since that date. The above mentioned easement was accepted by the City to September 1986 and meets the sumaary vacation provision of the Streets and Highways Code. Re t 11 1 e mltted, ~~~~~ ~, IiNM_SiNS:}y-~ Attachment RESOLUTION N0. V / - / 9r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CItt OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, TO SUMNIIRILY VACATE A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT BETWEEN WHEATON COURT AND THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD'S RISHT-OF-NAY NHEREAS, 6y Section 8333, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City ^ouncll of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga is authorized to suaaaarily vacate a landscape nwintenance access easeaKnt herein acre Darticularly descrl6ed; and NHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence sub~aitted that said landscape iaaintenance access easeaent, dedicated less than Pive years ago and note than one year has trot been used for its intended purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED by Lhe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaawnga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga hereby au elc~s order vacating said landscape a~aintenance access easeiaent as shown on Nap V_p83 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucaaanga, which 1s attached hereto, awrked Exhibits "A", and "B" and by reference awde a part thereof. SECTION 2: Thet frowt and after the date the resolution 1s recorded, said lan sc peapead maintenance access easeawrnt no longer constitutes a DuDlic service easenent. SELTiun 3: loot the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution~o ~e recorded Tn the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. ~3 EXHIBIT 'A' 300-0100 SH:cw LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ACCESS EASEMENT 7/20/88 WITHIN TRACT NO. 13060 (TO BE QUIT-CLAIKED) THAT PORTION OF A 15.00 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LYING WITHIN THE EASTERLY 7.50 FEET OF LOT 10 OF TRACT N0. 13060 PER MAP RECORDED IN HOOK 192 PAGES 52 THROUGH 65 'INCLUSIVE OF MAP HOOKS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE IN PART HEREOF IS A SKETCH ENTITLED "EXHIBIT B". THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPA ED BY ME, OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION. Y LKER, L.S. 446 O~~NDS~9G' LIC E EXPIRES 9/30/89 ~ Fc P ~, N0.M69 ~ Pj ~j ~ ~ v ~/ JQ,,`~~A r b\ W O ~ e 2 ~ i~ J 2 f C ~ O ~~ry~`~/) • SS/ H W ~ ~ O ~ b O O I Z ° G ~o W o ~ v o^h- F W N c U `o ° ~ _ 2 t^ ^ ° r - oE~o, 3°n rc c . i `~ oc ~ ~1 puce C. Z ~ O ~ ~ O C ` ° w ~ E o ~ i ~~'~ ~°~ ivJ NO1tI3HA1 ~l ~ n ~ ~ 1 i 1 ~~ o m ~_ m x W O K U C3 a a - ---- - CITY OF RANCHO CCCA~IONGA STAFF REPORT a DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Carnelian Street, East Side Parkway ~ Beautification Improvement Project, from Yineyard Avenue to Base Line Road, to Gateway Construction, for the amount of E98,661.00, to be funded with Beautification Funds, Account ~i No. 21-4647-8046 ~ RECOMIENOATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted, except the bid submitted by Artistic Landscape which shall be rejected as non-responsive, and award the contract for Carnelian Street, East Side Parkway Beautification Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Gateway Construction for the amount of (98,661.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 15. 1989; fnr tho euhiart nrniart natavuv rnnetnurtT nn Ic rho aDDarentlowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of f98, 661.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was f102,000.00. After the opening of the bids, Artistic landscape, upon reviewing their bid found a discrepancy. Artistic Landscape has, through staff, requested that City Council not consider their bid in the award. Staff concurs with Artistic Landscape's findings and believes that an award to Artistic Landscape would not be in the best interest of the City as well as the contractor. Staff has met with the City Attorney and the City Attorney concurred with staff. Therefore, staff has recommended that the bid submitted by Artistic Landscape be rejected as non-responsive. Staff has reviewed all other bids received and and in accordance with the bid requirements. required background investigation and finds requirements of the bid documents. Resp ly bm~ted, ~ /~ RHM:LB:sjm ~ cc: Purchasing found them to be complete Staff has completed the all bidders to meet 4he qq N t QT T G W 8 LL~ O V y~ O 8~ O N W N m T ti F 8 N r W LL O + Y Q .. € ~ ~ s O ~ U .n W N C 2 W LL O ~ y WS ~ W m N ` U LL f_ Z ~ t i G W y~ O N t _ yJ~ N ` F N_ U O hl' yFW N F W~ > t~ b i C J ~ QC S ~~jZj (7 u W i ~ M O s ~ a g ~ J i N 7 I ~ ~ I qP P N WV F 8 G 8 W O N J~ M V pOy yS O F` Gy Z y O o pS[ N f_ i 6 V ~ y_ S W~ W p>t p O i 1~. S N H C °~ o w y~ ~ C J N ~ R pqg~ O oSC ~1 H W~ Y W W LLw r 2 ~ } f J u r e ~ ~ b a ~ ~ g~ ~~5~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Civ11 Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Red Hill Park Drainage Improvement Project at Red Hill Park to Harris Construction for the amount of 5181,914.30, to be funded with Capital Revenue Funds Account No. 25-4285-7043 RECOMMENOATIOM: It is recoaaended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for Red Hill Park Drainage Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Harris Construction, for the amount of f181,914.30. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 21, 1989, for the subject project. Harris Construction is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid mount of (181,914.30 (see attached bid suaaaary). The Engineer's estimate was 5182,085.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and 1n accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds ail bidders t0 meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respect ul~ fitted, r -7° RHM: y Attachment cc: Purchasing t `~ p P ¢ O N Yfl N1 Y+I ~ LL N 3 8 e 0 8 N 0 g 8 o ~ 8 G 8 q~ 4 W .. 4 Y V 0 $_ :_ yg K J C 6 9 O Y f W y~ J y8 t Y A ffi S ~ R N q 2 f O S ~ LLC O ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: M;y 3, 1989 LY T0: City Council and Ctty Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 8Y: Linda Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award Lhe Avenida Ve,~ar Improvement Pro,{ect from Grove Avenue to Sierra Madre Avenue to Vance Corporation for the amount of 5158,253.65, to he funded with CDBG Funds Account No. 28-4333-8811 RECONENOATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council accept ail bids as submitted and •.ward the contract for Sierra Madre Avenue Improvement Protect to the lowest responsible bidder, Yance Corporation for the amount of (158,253.65. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, btds were solicited, received and opened on April 19, 1989, for the sub,~ect pro,~ect. Vance Corporation 1s the aLW hed Cid Su xryjnsi The bEnadineer'sh est isete was S 61 186?00.65 Staff has reviewed all bids received and found then to be coagiete and 1n accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background tnvestlgatton and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the btd documents. Respectf ted, '`~ ~ / RHM:LB:Iy Attachment cc: Purchasing W 0 a J s m a J C s 0 a s K `~ K E n w W i t O_ K r u .- W F p~ G J m 8 NN O O ~I ~ ~~ qN mN pN O P S rp 2 EFFF7 O W g 8 Y .~, x a O u S W N i f S M' G u f N cJ n! ILL rp Omi [L I~ aCU yVy1I1 J ~ ~O 6 p W ti S f W V F O a FI ~ ffi '.tl .. g w"~i u ~ .. .n z ~ W s > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ W W {j O ay ~ W~ <> C_ ~ _ 6G M i W O yr F ~ O a S g~ ~~ ~p3 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Niitie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 12420, located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue, submitted by Jenel Development tnc. RECOMIENDIITION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 12420, accepting the subJect agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 12420, located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue, in the Low Medium Residential District, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 26, 1986 for the division of 14.3 acres into 114 lots. 'ihe Developer, Jenel Development Inc., 15 submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5300,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 5150,000.00 Monumentatlan Bond: f 8,200.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school dtstrlcts and Cucamonga County Nater District. C.C. b R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file fn the City Clerk's office. Res mJtted, ~~ ,~ . ~~~ 1.~..._ . RHM~:JM:Iy Attachments ~~ RESOLUTION N0. V ~_ ' ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT N0. 12420 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12420, consisting of 114 lots, submitted by Jenel Development Inc., Subdivider, located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue, has been submitted to the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of Lhe State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City: and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements estabilshed as prerequisite to approvai of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same 1s approved and Lhe Mayor 1s authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto: and Ihat said improvement Security is accepted as g00d and sufficient, subject to approval as to forty and content thereof by the City Attorney; and That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of Bald City. ~~ RESOLUTION N0. gq- / 9~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 12420 MNEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, CaU forma, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and H1ghw~ys Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance D15tr1ct; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated hereto by this referenced t0 the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or fllina of an Engineer's "Report". NOM, THEREfORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this teglslative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, Including ~ el ry of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. / /~ i 4ANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 2 IECENP bfX STREET IIGHT • STREET 1REE 5~Y)il 5~ SFVENIN 51 NEEIMAY 6vE STREET 6UA TITS 5 ,.~,~` CT!'Y Of SAliCAO CtiCAY02iGA ! CE ~"y COVl17'Y 0? 9AAt B~RKARDDIiO ~ M :: 6 c. ~I sT9~cT k yFNOe ds. ~ I 9 EXNI9IT 'B' PROJECT NAME: TR 12420 N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 114 d/u N0. OF ASSESS, UNIT: 114 units STREET LIGHTING IMINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of La s to be Mnexed District No. _,_ y_ J_ 1 --- 7 --- --- --- 2 7 --- --- --- --- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Nance S4• ft• S4. ft. Ea. 1 6th Street --- --- 5 7th Street --- --- 18 Hellaun Avenue --- --- 43 JAA:S/3/89 V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 - T0: City Council and City Manager .;; FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Security Riders for Tract 13273, located on the southeast corner of MTtliken Avenue and I Mountain View Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes of California RECOMIEIDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution, accepting the Improvement Security Riders for Tract 13273. DACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Developer, Lewis Homes of California, Ts submitting Improvement Security Rtders to guarantee the construction of the following improvements: Amount of Improvement F.P. Bond Bond No. Milliken Ave. 8 MPSD 5-1: Foothill Blvd. to Mt. View 5653,000. 9665135 MPSD I: Foothill Blvd. - Haven Ave. to Elm Ave. t686,000. 9665525 MPSD I: Elm Ave. Foothill Blvd. to Park Basin 5146,000. 9665555 MPSD I: Church St. - Park Basin to Milliken Ave. 5758,000. 9665545 Park Basin 5486,000. 9665505 Copies of the Improvement Security Riders are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resp 11 ;yb~pitted, / '%' ~ ~. RHM: Attachment RESOLUTION N0, ~- I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RIDERS FOR TRACT N0. 13273 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 13273, submitted by Lewis Haines of California, and consisting of 1 lot, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 27, 1987; and WHEREAS, Tract map No. 13273 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry of Improvement Security Riders by Lewis Haines of California as developer. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, HEREBY RESOLYES that said Improvement Security Riders submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved by the Mayor on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; 70 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 _SE_VENTH STREET ~ ., LEGEND 0,1T STREET LIGHT • STREEI TREE STREET TpEES r i OUANTITV / TY E sixm sr S nL~+us ,wonerFOLin SF VfN*H ST ('V ~ALYOTUS Po ~ tvnNrHc HF.IIMRH IVE EVCALYATVS Aq(ynNrMEMOS ~~_~~• ~ 91XiN STREE ~ c`~Dw. CTPY O~ RANCHO ClTCA1lONGA s~~' ~ COVNIR or 8AN BERNARDQIo f ~' "~'~- BTATi o>, ~,-~~,- _ N ::~ V~ Im ~~ _/ ~ ,•• - - - - --" a _ , q , ~.,.. :-. ~,. ~ _~ J - ~~~ 11.E ~ _ _ ._ ~ ,=,, i / _J' I ~ ~ ~i I f ~-a+y lh. V CITY OF 1Ta~t:Teaet /3273 N RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'cart EGG D1Yr8rON ~ r E~ nrmv n urn vn n STAFF REPORT GATE: May 3, 1989 ;., T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, Ctty Engineer BY: Steve M. 0i1111and, Public Works InspectotL~~, SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Coagletton j RECONEIDATION: The required street taprovements for Parcel Map 7441 have been coagleted in an acceptable wooer and it is recaataended that City Council accept said iagrovements, authorize the C1ty Engineer to f11e a Notice of Coepletlon and authorize the City Clerk to release the faithful Perforwnce Bond in the amount of 55,600.00. Background/Analysts Parcel Map 7441 - located an the north side of Lomita Drtve betneen He11wn Avenue and Amethyst Avenue. DEVELOPER: Donald Tackett ~~ ~ j7~~ ,/~~ r P05®5-Ya1Ta~8iVE. r~n~ iratnae;-u~ ~+«y j21 h c, ,; ~ (ems. 9i7W ~j Release: Faithful Perforwnce Bond {Street) 55,600.00 Respectfully submitted, :~~j ~. RHM:SMG:Iy Attachments 7~ RESOLUTION N0. ~R- / `~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAigNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL IMP 7441 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILIN6 OF A NOTICE OF COlPLETION FOR THE WORK NHEREAS, the construction of public Tagrovements for Parcel Map 7441 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion 15 required to be filed, certifying the nark complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the cork is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion nlth the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: May 3, 1989 ~~ T0: C1ty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. G11111and, Public Norks Inspecfar~" SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for the U.S. Post Office have been completed in an acceptable manner and it 1s recow•ended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the C1ty Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 534.000.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS U. S. Post Office - located on the rarthwest corner of Arrow Highway and Mh1te Oak Avenue. DEVELOPER: Berry Construction :YC1 McSG 11Lh JireeL Upland, CA 91786 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 534,000.00 Respectf submitted, // '• ~ RHM:SMG:Iy Attachments RESOLUTION N0, gq- ' 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYENENTS FOR U.S. POST OFFICE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public iayrovements for U.S. Post Office have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required Lo be filed, certifying the work coaplete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT PATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 3, 1989 ~~,: ri City Council and Ctty Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspectu~- ~T= Release of Maintenance Bond for Tractt 12621 located on south side of Arrow Highway between Madrone Avenue and Baker Avenue RECONEIMTION: It is recommended that the City Coundl authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Mscleod Development 2 North lake Avenue 1670 p,~.e.~„, ra oiinl Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 516,900 Respectf submttted, J C RHM~SMG. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: Accept for Maintenance the Victoria Street Rehab111tation Protect, from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue, Contract No. 88-101, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" RE.COMIEIDIITIOM: It is recommended that the C1ty Council accept for Maintenance Victoria Street Rehabilltatton Protect, from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue, Contract No. 86-107, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Perforwance Bond Tn the amount of (144,979.85 and authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of f72,489.93 six (5) months after the recordation of said notice, if no claims here been received. BACKGRODNO/ANALYS}S The sub,~ect protect has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amounts will be submitted for City Council consideration at a future Council meeting. Several contract items and minor contract change orders are still in dispute. Respec y submitted, ~~ ~ RHM:M ;}y Attachments 7 RESOLUTION N0. ~ !" A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL 1fORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR VICTORIA STREET REHABILITATION, FROM ET[WANDA AVENUE i0 EAST AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NOA]( WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Victoria Street rehabilitation, fray Etiwandd Avenue to East Avenue have been coagleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Coapletion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer 15 authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Reeorder of San Bernardino County. 78 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, C1ty Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Morks Inspector SU&IECT: Accept for Maintenance the Traffic Signal and Safety Lightfng at the intersection of Archl6aid Avenue 'and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 88-166, as coaglete, release the bonds and authorize the C1ty Engineer to file a 'Notice of Coagletton" RECOMEIDATIOM: It is recaaaaended that Lhe City Council accept for Maintenance Traffic Signal and Safety Lightfng at the intersection of Archlbaid Avenue and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 88-166, as coaglete, authorize the City Engineer to f11e a "NOt1ce of Completion', and authorize the release of the Faithful Perforaunce Bond in the mount of (65,260.00 and authorize the release of the Labor and Materiels Bond 1n the mount of 132,630.00 six (6) months after the recordation of said notice, if no claiaa have been received. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been caagleted in accordance with the plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the C1LY Engineer. The final contract aabunts will be submitted for C1ty Council consideration at a future Council meeting. Several contract iteas and minor contract change orders are still 1n dispute. Respect bmitted, RHM:MDL:Iy Attachments RESOLUTION N0, ~9- l 9U A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMN)NGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROYEMENTS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NNEREAS, a Notice of Completion Ts required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a NaiTce of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. rnmv nn n ~ wrn vn nrrn w "rnwrn . STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: CTty Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Norks Inspector~fy/y' fir: SUBJECT: Accept for Maintenance the 8th Street and Grove Avenue at the A.T. 8 S.F. Railroad Crossing, RRS Protect No. M-8079(3) improvements, Contract No. 88-121, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" RECONEIDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept for Maintenance the 8th Street and Grove Avenue at the A.T. 6 S. F. Railroad Crossing, RRS Protect No. M-8079(3) improvements, Contract No. 88-121, as coaglete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion", and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of (124,925.15 and authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond 1n the amount of 5124,925.15 six (5) months after the recordation of said notice, if no claims have been received. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subtect protect has been completed in accordance with the plans and sDeclfications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amounts will be submitted for City Council consideration at a future Councll meeting. Several contract items and minor contract change orders are still in dispute. Respectful submitted, c ` , _~ -' /i T ~~~ RHM:MDL:Iy Attachments ~f RESOLUTION N0. ~9 - ! / / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOIi 8TH STREET AND GROVE AVENUE AT THE A.T. d S.F. RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZ]NG THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for 8th Street and Grove Avenue at the A.T. 6 S. F. Railroad Crossing ia~provements have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authortzed to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 8~- -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ STAFF REPORT '~~'~ DATE: May 3, 1989 ~~ TD: Mayor and Mambers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14218 - NORDIC - ppea o e ann ng amw ss on s ec s on approv ng a residential subdivision and design review of 8 single family lots on 5.71 acres of land in the Hillside Residential District located north of inspiration Orlve and east of Crestview Pi ace - APN: 200-44123-28. Associated with the tract is Tree Removal Permit 89-08 requesting the removal of two (2) Eucalyptus 91obu1us. The City Council reviewed the above-referenced appeal at their Apr11 19, 1989 meeting. The City Council directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Genial for Tract 14218 and to return the item on the Consent Calendar Resp u11y 5u ted, Bra r City P1 nner BB:BN:ko Attachments: Resolution of Dental 3 RESOLUTION N0. 89- ~0~1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 14218, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIYISION AND DESIGN REYIEN OF 8 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 5.71 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED NORTH OF INSPIRATION ORIVE AND EAST OF CRESTVIEN PLACE - APN: 200-441-23-28. ASSOCIATED NITN THE TRACT IS TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 89-08 REQUESii NG THE REMOYAL OF TNO (2) EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS A. Recitals. (i) Nordic Development has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map ND. 14218 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". (111 On the 19th day of April, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing for an appeal an the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (111) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, 1t is hereby found, deter~Ained and resolved by the ^iJ ~~~ ~aurl..l' -C NL` nI L.. ..i "w ll~ha ru wa~ - full u.~u: .~ ~ .~ .~yu ... 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on April 19, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located north of Inspiration Drive and east of Crestview Place with a street frontage of 1,107 feet along Inspiration Drive and 270 feet along Crestview P1 ace and is presently vacant; and (b) The property an all sides of the suD,ject site is approved Tract 10210. Tract 10210 was approved with 1-acre minimum cots. Lots 18-30 of the tract were later allayed to contain a minimum of 41,000 square feet. The overall density of Tract 10210 1s 1.04 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density of Tract 14218 would be 1.4 dwelling units per acre; and ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. RESO. OF DENIAL FOR 7T 14218 - NORDIC May 3, 1989 Page 2 (c) The lot sizes in the proposed tract average 31,363 square feet. They range in size from 27,878 to 33,105 square feet. The adtacent 4 lots to the north range in size from 41,034 to 42,415 square feet; and (d) The protect is incompatT6le with the surrounding tract since 8 lots would back up to 4 lots; and (e) The original intent of this tract was to be minimum 1 acre lots. The Council reviewed the surrounding tract on November 18, 1981 and referred it back to the Planning Commission for consideration of a new zone classification for hillside areas. The Council reviewed a zone change for the tract on January 20, 1982 which reconeended a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet. The Councii did not approve this zone change, but rather, required a lacre minimua lot size. On February 3, 1982 the City Council approved Ordinance 159 which re-zoned Tract 10210 to R-1-1 Acre. (f) The intent of the Hillside Residential District 1s to maintain natural open space character, protect natural land forms, minimize erosion, provide for public safety, protect water, flora and fauna and to establish design standards to provide for limited development 1n harmony with the environment. The proposed protect is not consistent with the purpose of the Hillside Residential District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon Lhe specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Coamission hereby finds and wuuiuum as Tuiiuaa. (a) That tentative tract is not consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is not consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is not physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable intury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. RESO. OF DENIAL FOR TT 14218 - NORDIC May 3, 1989 Page 3 4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the protect has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth 1n paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby denies the application. 6. The Secretary to this Cownission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ~~ ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: May 3, 1989 i T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Approval of the Detachment of Tract Nos. 13748, 13857 and 13858 located north of Highland Avenue west of Milliken Avenue from Landscape Maintenance District No. i and Street L19hung Maintenance District No, 2 and to annex Tract Nos. 13748, 13757 and 13758 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 and setting the date of public hearing for June 7, 1989 RECQ~EIMTION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the detachment of Tract Nos. 13748, 13857 and 13858 from Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, approving the Engineer's Reports and setting the date of nuhlie has rlnn rananAi nn fha ri lv'e iMnnri ~.. .~ . .~... .~~~. ~.... ....,..- •--J -~~ ~. u....a to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and Street~Lighting Maintenance No. 5. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Presently Tract Nos. 13748, 13857 and 13858, located west of Milliken Avenue north of Highland Avenue, are included 1n Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 (City-wide), but looking at the design of landscaping and lighting of adjacent tracts, Tract Nos. 13748, 15857 and 13858 are more compatible with those ayacent tracts that are included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community). Staff recommends that Lhe subject tracts be detached from Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and annexed 9nto Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and Street Lighting Maintenance No. 6. This will enable us to annex 1n the future the areas north of Highland Avenue between Deer Creek and Dqy Creek Channels into these Districts. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TR 13748, 13857 8 13858 MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 2 Attached for Council consideration is a resolution approving the detachment and annexation and a resolution giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Reports for the subject annexation. The Consent and Naiver to Annexation form signed by the developer 1s on file in the City Clerk's office. ~8 RESOLUTION N0. 8 1~ ~ ~I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 5 FOR TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13758 NHEREAS, on Mdy 3, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City reports in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and NHEREAS, said City Courcil has duly considered each report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said reports are sufficient, and that said reDOrt, nor any part thereof, require ar should be modified in any respect. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and . T-ll M..4 ..~ wt tl.w ~.wl dww t~l ..w..www in n nn ti wn LAn..w{1F contained in each report be, and each of themvare+hereby,Vpreliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and descri6e~'fn each report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in saffd~essa~ent District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said reports are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4; That said reports shall stand as the City Engineer's Report fort purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. ~9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) for Annexation of Tract Nos. 13748, 13857 and 13858 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, OTvtslon 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex ail new subdivisions into landscape Maintenance District No.6. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon alt lots within Tract Nos. 13748, 13857 and 13858 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the recorded Map as roadway right-of-way or easements to be granted t0 the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and landscaping are as stipulated 1n the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference fs hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact iocation of the lendscaped arees. The plans and specifications for landscaped improvement on the individual development is ilereuy IpoUC a yarL ui tills ,zyuri w ii,c aa,xe c~ieul ua ii Sd iu yi uiu diiu specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway ingrovement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysts and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) cents per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 including this annexation 1s as follows: Existing This New District Annex Total Landscape Area 1,114,260 117,834 1,232,094 Trees --- 1,102 1,102 No. of 0. U, 1,194 232 1,426 /~ Per Lot Annual Assessment 1,232,094 x S .30 = 5369,628.20 5375 153.20 = f263.08 = Sp1.92 1,102 x 55.W = ~5 b2~5.'~ -T;4'f/i ~~ Assessment shall apply to each,lot as enumerated to Section 6 and the attached assessment diagram. Nhere the development covered by th15 annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvements for the District are found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Nhere there Ts more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing to June, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the Are'~ous"f~sc~1 yeaA whl~h~areato DF iu»vered through assessments as required SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the 0lstrict or abandon the proceedings. 4. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 5. Every year in June, the C}ty Council conducts a pubiit hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments, 91 Properties and ingroveax!nts to be included within this annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 TURF GROUND COVER TREES TRACT D/U STREET NAMES SOFT. S0. FT. EACH 13748 Milliken Ave. Pkxry. 19,920 24,089 89 13657 232 Milliken Ave. Median 12,000 12,224 85 13158 Banyan St. Pkp~. --- 13,292 85 Lot A, Lots 32-33, ?R 13748 6,443 14,668 134 Lot A, TR 13857 --- 1,524 --- Lots 9-11, TR 13857 1,320 10,425 85 Lots 58-61, TR 13858 2,760 11,133 101 Interior Streets 523 Total 32;463 75;39r rIQ2-' 9~- Banyan St Parkw[ lots 58-61 ,Tract 1 4ve. Parkway Lot A, Tract 13857 1, Tract 13857 Ave. PAedian I-ot A, Lot 32 & Lot 33, Tract 13748 ~nten0r sveei frees. ~m 'r.ii~~en Avc Parkway: ~6!hkcn Ave 61~diam Panvan St Parkwav~ Lol A. Lots 92 n 33 7 ract 13748' Lot A, Tract 19nE?' Lols 911, Tm~113a5i I ol5 50 51 "~=-I 13659 jy~A Graundcover Trees 19,920 51, 24,089 s I. 89 24,22451. - 85 17292 5.1. 85 6,443 5 i. 14,668 s f. f 34 1,524 5.1. - 1,720 51. 10,424 51 85 7,760ti, 11,179 s1 101 ,,~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA]tONOA tr ,' COiJNPY OF SAN 81SNARDIIt1O " .~ z '- ~' i BTATS OF CAI.1F'ORNtA ~; 6 ~ ~sr- N c EXHIBIT "A" ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ND. 6 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 Banyan St Parkes Lots 58-61 ,Tract Lot A, Tracl 1385' lot A, Lot 32 8 I.ot 33. Tract 13748 '.en Ave. Parkway 9-I1, Tract 13857 6uf~ Ave. ivleuian ~~~ s~~~ ~'' crrY o>t aexcso cna-~coxae oourrr~r o>E e~x s~ivnaDalo n ,_ ~L ~' ~'~ ' ~ TRACfS 13748, ,~ ~ y ~: ~Q'iy = ~AT~i o~ Ci~~~A 13857 6 1365H ~,~D -_ ~ MIGHI ANO M4 yVE RESOLUTION N0. ~R- G~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DETACHMENT OF TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 ANO 13858 FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 2 AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 6 AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT N0. 5; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, Tract Nos. 13748, 13857 and 13858 work program areas are included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Mainten anct DT strict No. 1 and Street Lighting District No. 2; and WHEREAS, the design of the landscaping and lighting of Trait 13748, 13857 and 13858 are compatible with the design of landscaping and lighting of adjacent tracts included in Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and Street Lighting Maintenance No. 5. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES: Section 1. That Trait Nos. 13748, 13857 and 13858 be detached from Landscape~a nte~ance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and be annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5. Section 2. That Notice 1s hereby given that on June 7, 1989 at the ~--„~~ _ _ IIUUI UI I..IV Il.ill. III •IIC V11~' bVY10.11 b11GMiICIi uY i i LhC vT iV of Rancho Cucamonga, any and persons having any objections~to the work or extent of the assessment district, mqy appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then such protests must contain or be accompanlned by written evidence that such signer fs the owner of the property so described. Section 3. Tha*, all the work herein proposed shall be done and carried LFrcu~fn'pursuance cf an afct of the legislature of the State of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division IS of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Section 4. That a published notice shad be made pursuant to Section 6961 of t e vernment Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause Lhe same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once 1n The Dail Re or~t, a newspaper of general circulation published to the City of ntar0 io, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ~( CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~ucaxq,~ oP ~ ~' + 'n z O F F $ z UL > 197i ~ DATE: May 3, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FAOM: Duane A. Bakery Adminietrat ive Aeeista.t ~ SUBJECT: R t f 5 t f T P e t' n 'n th 1-10 C id r Staff recomtnende that the City Council adopt the attached ResoluL ion elating tRe Clty•e eupport of tree preeervat ion in CALTAANS' Trarsportation Corridors throughout the region. HACRGROUND: The City received a request Fran the City at Pontana to support their efforts to block CALTAANH• Dropoaed cutting and trimming of trees along the I-10 Transportation Corridor. Fontann has naked for end received an Lnjunetion from the court temporarily halting cALTRANH• plane to do any work on these tree e. Fontana requested our support, and even though the City ie not coot lguoue with any part of the 2-10 Corridor, there are other CALTiUNH Transportation Corridors ihroughoui Rancho Cucamonga wRich this could have an impact on. With the passage of this Reeolution, the City will be showing its public support for maintaining the trees along the Treneportat ion Corrldcre, and also will be publicly recognizing the importance that Lreee and besot if tcetion along ihene Tranaportat ion Corridors play in the quality of life of our citizens. OABejle 89-260 ~3 RESOLUTION N0. 89~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE GOALS OF THE CITY OF FONTANA AND PRESERVING THE TREES ALONG THE I-10 CORRI OOR WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga believes that the preservation of trees is essential to our environment: and WHEREAS, the trees along the I-10 corridor, while not directly affecting our City, are impcr tant to the overall environment of our region; and WHEREAS, the City of Fontana has asked for our support for their efforts to maintain the trees along the I-10 corridor; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga supports following all environmental procedures in regard to tree preservation and tree maintenance along the I-10 and other regional transportation corridors. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve and support the tree preservation goals of the City of Fontana along the I-10 corridor and further resolves its support for the preservation and proper maintenance of trees throughout the regional transportation corridors for the positive impact they have on the region. I O rnmv nn n . w.n vn n. rn . ,rrn... . - Vlll VL' 1f A1. V11V VVVA1,1V 1VVH STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the 19th Street Improvements from Carnelian Street to west of Amethyst Street. RECOI~EIDATIOM• It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study, Parts 1 aM II for the proposed 19th Street improvements and issuance of a Negative Declaration therefor and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Deter~aination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. eACiisROUO/ANAt,rus This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed 19th Street Improvements. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached document has been prepared to penait construction of the above mentioned improvements. Said improvements generally entail the widening of streets, installing curbs and gutters, drainage improvements, etc. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed protect will not create a significant effect and therefore recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration. Rasp y ubmitted, / ~"~_" RHM:MO:pam ~ Attachment ~ /O~ RESOLUTION N0. 89- ~ y A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED 19TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO NEST OF AMETHYST STREET. WHEREAS, the 19th Street Improvements as a Public Agency Project shall be subject to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act necessary to protect, rehabilitate and enhance the enviromaental quality of the State; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration all the available inputs and has reviewed same concerning the proposed 19th Street Improvements. NOM, THEREFORE, the C1ty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The City Cou~ii of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga erg y6-approves the Enviroraaental Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a Negagve Declaration for the proposed 19th Street Improvements. SECTION 2: The C1ty Clerk is dtrccted to file a Notice of Determination pursuant t0 the Gailfornia Environmental Quality Act. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED th15 3rd day of May, 1989. AYES: NOES: ADSENT: enn s ou ar ~~~ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY -PART I GENERAL For all pro,iects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where Lhe DraJect appl icatlon is made. Upon race tpt of this appllcat ion, the Planning D1vislon staff w111 prepare Part 1[ of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The protect will have no siggnificant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration w111 be filed, (2) The proiect will have a signs ftcant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report w111 be prepared, or (3) An additional lnfonnatlon report should be supplied by the applicant giving further infonnatlon concerning the proposed project. Date Filed• Pro~ett Title: 19th Street Improvements and wldaning Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Canrrunity Develvvmenf Devt.. Enaineerina Division. 9340 Baseline Rd.. P.O. Box Name; Address,.Telephone ot* Person To Be Contacted ~ ~~ y V~~ rnnrarnlna_ this Protect: Oerry Lindquist of .DOn Creek and Associates 2428 M. Grand Ave., Suite L, Santa Ana, CA 92701 (714) 543-0990 Location Of .Prodeet: 19th Street, fran Carnelian Street to Ame th vst Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: See Atta L1st other penstts necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: _ Celtrens Permit - Calif. Dept. of Transportation San eernardlno Co. Flood Control Permit - S.B.C.F.C.D. Enc:oacrrnent en private pEeperty - CI[y or Rancho Cucaronga to Purchase outright or obtain Right of Way Easement. / ~ f r_t . . ~ ,. PROJECT 6ESCRIPTIOM~ Proposed use or proposed project: widening and rehabtlitatlon of 19th Street from Carnelian Street to 30U' west of Amethyst Avenue Acreage of protect area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, 1f any:_ Project area is apRroxima tely 6.5 acres. There are no existing or proposed buildings. ~~ Describe the envtronaental setttn of the pro ect site including Information on topography, so s a ty, p ants (trees, land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): The stretch of 19th Street under consideration Is orlmarlly residential with large eucalyptas trees llnina the South Sitl of the street and a variety of trees and follaae Ilninn the to side. The residential structures on the North side are conside_ rob iy clncor .., h nr -~~~ d riah~ o' way than those cn the South side The box cuive[t at E1e [vl St will b 1 no hen d nn the nrlh side as a result of widening. The culvert la ilanL orl ., o n no. .. u.. with cobblestone retainlna wall whi h ar a - t f h^ dj t properties. _ Other exlstlno structures which will be affecCed by the orolect Include power poles private fences {4 or 5 hlo~k ~^ainllnk and wood and 2 or 3 concrete drives. Is the project part of a larger pro,lect, one of a ~serles of cumulative actions, which although tndlvidually small, may as a whole have significant env lrorroental impact hio, the 19th Street Imoroverrents will stand ainnn and _ gX::~:,^,g •~,:(v'r oT2'ti iu file uitiRlB tB rlant of way from Zl rcon to Pmethvst. 'O~ (-? YILL THIS PROJECT: ~ YES NO 1. Create a substantial change to ground contours? _ x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise el'produce ,vibration or glaret _ x 3. Create a substantial change fn demand for municipal services (DOlice, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ X 4. Create changes 1n the ex lS Ling Zoning or General Plan deslgnatfonst _ x 5. Reaove any existing trees? How many? 30+ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, X flammables or explosives? _ _ Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): Removal of existing trees In the proposed right of way will be offset by placement oP street trees at approxtmately 20 toot Intervals along entire project limits. 7. Estimate the amount of sewage and so11d waste materials this protect will generate daily: none 8. Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this n.o lovf• TPrmnrarv cnnst nir.tion traffic only 8. protecle inecublcnyards9ra2700 (CUV ~nofacuG111127~0 eCUY edoPofll~s 10. If the protect involves the construction of residential units, complete the form an the next page. n/a CERTIFICATION: Y hereby certify that the statements furnished above and 1n the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this 1n1t1a1 evaluation Lo the hest of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and beltet. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can 6e made by the Planning Division. .. Date: ~-S'~-~ Signature /A`~ ~~-+~~c' Ti t l e AI~oC'tf «° ~t {hL cyGi~2'tL /vW I-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRDCT[ON The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their ability to accommodate the proposed res ldent tai development. Developers are required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No. Spec if le L,ocatlon of Project: • I.~~ Number of single fmily units: '2. Number of multiple faintly units: 3. Date proposed to ibegin construction: 4: Earliest date of occupancy: Modell a and / of Tentative •- 5. Bedrooms Price Range -,i, ~ ~,. i PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TDTAL I O ~ I-4 ATTAO-fv£NT PPRT 1 INITIAL STI.OV Assessors Parcel Nos. for Proposed Rlght of Way, South Stde of 19th St. Zlrcon Ave. to Beryl St: 202-461-61, -62, -65 Beryl St. to Heliman Ave.: 202-041-41, -03, -52, -35 Hellman Ave. to Amethyst Ave.: 202-061-26, -25, -02, -18, -17, -34, -33, -05 202-061-41, -38, -28, -15 North Slde of 19th St. Beryl St. to Eastwood Ave: 201-341-48, -47, -46, -45, -59, -58 Eastwood Ave, to Hellman Ave.: ~nl _'S41_nA _n7. -06. -05. -04. -54 Hellman Ave. to Pmethyst Ave.: 201-474-10, -09, -08, -07, -06, -O5, -04, -03, -02 O~ .:~ _ .\ ` a CITY OT AANCAO COCA.~lONCA PAAT II - INITIAL SIVDY ENVIAONMENIAL CHECKLIST APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga FILING DATE: LOC NUlD]ER: PR0.IECT: 19th Street Improvements and Widening PROJECT LOGTION: 19th Street, Between Zircon Ave 8 Amethyst Ave I. ENTIRONl~NTAL It4'ACTS ' (Explanation of all ^yea" and "maybe" ansvan era saqulrad an actaehad sheets). YES NAYgE NO 1. Eo11a and Ceoloev. Will the proposal have •igniileanc sasYles !a: a. Vnsta6la ground conditlona or iw changes So pologlc ralaelonshipal X b. Dieruptiona, dlaplaeemancs, eomDactioa of I Durial of the aoilt _ _ c. Change 1a topography or ground surface I contour Saurvalst _ ~ _ d. 1'ha dutrvecioo, covering or mo¢i[Stae ion of say uaiqua geologic or physical teaturast _ K s. Aay poantlal lnerusa in vlnd or vaur axoa Loo of ao11a, of lee ting •Lthar on or o[t aiu cooditonat _ X t. Changes in erosion •iltatian, or dspos ltlon? _ A g. Exposure of people or Propeeey co geologic hazards such a urchquakas, landalidn, aud- ^lidea, ground Lailura, or similar hssardat _ ~( h. M ineraaa• 1n the race o[ sxtiatcion and/os uu of any mineral ruourcat ~ ~ ~( 2, Hydrology. Will the proposal have •ignl[lcant i•sYlta Spi 9 / O 1 rags ~' "' YES MaYEE 30 a. Cheeps Sn euuan ea, or cha couru of direeeion of owing screams, rivers, or ephemeral scream ehaanalat x b. C~fangas !o absorption ra tea, drainage pa etarns, or eha rata and amoune of surface water runoff! X • ~ c. ~alaearions ro eha course or Ilw of flood • „• waearat _ x .d. Cheap !a the amount of surface wads in any ' body of watari X ' ~ ~ a. Discharge lard surtau wacrrs, er any • aluratloa o! eurtace water qualltyt X f. Aluraeloa et groundwater characuristicat X g. Chang in the quantity of groundwacan,~ either through direct addicioas or wich- ~ ~ ~ dravala, or through Sncartecenca with an aquifasT Qudityt .. Cuanclcyt X h. 'yhe reduction !n the emouae of wear ocher- visa awilabla tot public wacae avppliut X i. Exposure of peoDla or property to wnr ~ related hasarda weh as tloodiag or salehasT X ~ _ ~. air wualf n. will Ma proposal Kara slgnitleant LalYlta Sai ' a. Constant or periodic air amlasiona from mobile or lndlrace scarcest X gtatiaaary soureut ~ ~• b. Dacariosatlea of ambient a1r quality and/or Saearlaraaa wieh the attainment of applicable air gwllcy ataadardat ', Y e. Altararion of local or regional c1lmaUe eoadleioaa, affecting air mavamenc, moiacuri or eaapaeatua7 X __ 3. gi_ta ' Flora. W111 the proposal have aignllleane maul to in: a. Change Sn the characteriaeies of species, Sneluding diversity, distiibutloa, oe nwbae X of any apaeiu of p]antst ~ _ b. Raduttloa of the numbers o! any unique, rata X o[ asdanprad apaein o[ plancsJ //~ v 7!+t., t e. Iaereduetion o! nnv or dlarup clue apaclea of .~ pleats into an great d. Radutt:lon in chn po cenclal for agrieulcural . •. pt'oducclon7 "- ~ ~ Fauna. Will the proposal 'havn e1gnlLicant raaulca in: _ 1 - - ~ ~'~ a. Cheap la cM charge uriaclca o[ spades, Including dlvara icy, dlacrlbucion, or nwben of any apnciu of anfmalat b. Reduction o! the numbsra o! any calque, rata or andangarnd apatite of anlaulaT c. Introduction of nnv or dlarup t iva apaclea oL animals Snco an area, or result Sn a~barriar to eh• migration or movement of animalat d. Deterioraeion or removal oC nxfaecng fish or vildlifa habitaet YES MAYBE \0 x X X X X X S. Pooulation. M111 the pzopoaal have •ignitieanc ruulu Sns ^. Mill [h~'propaul alter cha Iocacloa, diseri- buelon, dana ity, diveralcy, or grovth rata of cha human population of an great b'. Mill eha Oropoaal a[Lace existing houaing, or cnan a demand for additional bowing? 6. soelo-EtonomlC Faeeara. H111 cha .proposal have slgnitinanc rawlca ins ' •. Chmp Sn local or regional seelo-aaonomle characcariaclca, including economic or cc®greial diveralcy, tax tau, and propsrcy valuas4 b. Mill pto~set coats 6e equ ![ably QSstributad among prole[[ banaticlarlas, S.a., Duyars,~ tax payers oc prole[[ usnnt 7. Gnd Uae and Flannina Conaiderationa. M111 the proposal have acgniticanc reaulca in? a. i aubaranriai •iro.r,nn ,.i •1,• nr aa.nr nr plaonad land w• o! m aruT b. A eontlice vich any designaelons, obi aceivas, po11c1u, or adop ud plena of any govsrnmancal anclClu7 e. M Impact upon cha qutaicy or quantity of axis clog consumptive or non-conaumpc iva rscruclonal oppoccun/ic/Scat I I l X X X X __ X X X :age . ~' ~ YES NAY9E NO B. Tranaoortation. 57111 the propoaal have aignlf !cant results Sn: +. Generation of substantial adds clonal vehicular movemen cT X b. Effects on sxlating streets, or demand for nav strut cons [rut Cion? R c. Effects on existing parking fac111cies, or demand !or nav parking? X p d. Substantial impact upon existing transports- tlon aye tams? _ X e. Ale aratlona to pnaene pat [erne of dreula- CSon or mvemant of paopla and/or goods? __ ~ ' f. Ale Qra[10na [O Or effeCC! OR p[elenc And potential vatar-borne, rail, mass transit or air ezafflc? _. ~ g. Zncraaaea fn traffic hazards co motor vehicles, blcyella to oz pedea erlana? ~ 9. Cultural Resources. W111 the propoaal have ^ignificanc results Sn; a. A dls turbanee to the integrity of archaeological, paleontologleal, and/or hla to rice! resources? _ __ ~ 30. Heal th. Ssfeev, a..A N.~~...... e - propoaal have slgnificanr reaul ca in: .•--- ~~~- a. Creation o! any health hazard or potential healeh hazard? _ ~_ K b. Exposure of paopla to potential healeh hazards? ~_ X c. A risk RE axploa ion or release of hazardous aubetancaa Sn cha even[ of an accident? _ _~ g d. An inersase 1n eha numher of indlvldwla or apaciee of vector or paeheno game organisms or the exposure of paoDle co such <z ganiamat ~~ ~ e. Zncreasa in existing noise levels? ~. E. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous nola• lavaLt ~ ~ g. The creatloa of ob~a<tlanahle odo n? ~ h. M intruu Sn light a r glue? ~ ~ / /1 may; YES 4AYBE NO 11. Au thetlea. p111 the propose! have •igniL !tent results in: ~~~ •. the obatrue tlon or dngrada clon o! anq acanlt vlata or viav7 X b.' T'h• creation of an sea the [!tally ottemlve a14 T X e. A contllet with the objet clue of designated or potential acsnlc corridors? X ~ ` 12.~ Ucfiit iea and Pub11t Service, p111 the propbaal have a algnificant need for nav systems, or alteratlona to eha follaving: a. Electric povarT Y. b. Natural or paekaged gaa7 X e. 'COmawnlcatlona gatemaT X d. ~ pater eupplyt X ~ •. pasteveur tacilitlut _ X _ t. Flood control strueturast X _ ~ g. Sol1d vaau facllltiaaT _ X ._ ,. _,__„ h. F1ra proact SonT X ~. ....u~ yw cecciuei „~ . ~• ~ k. Parka or otTar ractasda:ul Leci11e1uT X _ 1. Nafntananea of pub llc tae ilf ties, Including roads and Llood control facilitlasT X ^. Other ~ovetmental sarvluaT ~ _ X -- 17. EnerRY and Scarce Reaourc ea. p111 eha proposal' have sign!! lcaot ueulta in: a. Uu o[ aubatantial or exceaeiw tual or energy? ~~ X b. Subs untLl Inc reaa• in demand upon eriating sourua of energy? X _ e. M inerau• !n the demand for devQopmanc of nev eouree• of enargy7 X d. M lnenu• or Perpetuation of the consumption oL non-renwaba• [ocma of energy, vhen Lud61• [anevabl• eourca^ o[ energy are avallablat X -6• I~ . I~h ~ ~~~ rnYl ~~. .. YES MAYBE NO •6~ a. Subatanelal depla tion of any nonrenewable or aearca natural reaourca? X 14. )iandspory FSndinga of Slgnif icance. '-•- a. Dou CM pro)ect have the patnn tial to degrade [ha quality of CM envlronmenC, cube uneially reduce the habitat oL fish or wildlife apeciea. cauaa •fiah or wildlife population co drop below ulf auaulning levels, [hreagn [o elimina[a a plan[ or animal eommunfry, reduce the number ar reatricc the range of a rare or andangacad pleat or animal or aliminan Smportaoc aaamplaa of the mal or periods of California his cony or prehia Cory? X __- b. Doea the prol eee have the potential to achieve ^hort-term, co the disadvantage o[ long-term, anvironmsn cal goalai (A ahorc-corm impact on ehe anvironaent fa one vhich oecura in a ralativaly briai, definitive period of time while long- tatm lmpacta will endure yell Snco [he future). X c. Doer the pro~act have impacts vhich era lod ividually limited, but eumulaclvaly considarabla7 (Cumulacivaly cone idara6le mane that CM locremental afLatu o! an individual psoleet era canaiderable when viewed in connection with the et[aeta of peat Drolaeta, and probable future pro}acca). X d. Doea cha pro~ece have environmaneal effae ea -. - . wua~w ciai aaveraa eiieure • f on huaun baioga, either directly or iodfraetly? i X 2T. DISCUSSION OF ENtRAONlLvNTAL EVALVATION (S.e., of aftlrmaclva ansvara co the above quay ciona plus a dlacuseion of proposed nleigacion maasurea). SEE ATTAQiVFNT _ ,, . ~~~ pTTACHt•IENT PFlFT II I. 1. b. Soil will be removed, plrac c:d and compacted as n~cessarv per the street witlenin9 plans. l.l.c. As a consequence of street widening, there will Pio ~~~.~me chanoes in u_r ~un~ xv rn~. ~. co~~~c.~r .n ~.--: r'. ala .... r. ,o grading. I. 2. b. The extension of the 19tf~ St. Storm Drain and relocation of e>:i stinn catch ha,ins per the I'ir onmsed project will channel e::rstinn street flow rn the sump area between Eer yl and Hr_llman nx{{ecti vely into the e:ai sting Storm Drain- I.1.c. As a consequence of street widr-..Wing, there will be same changes in ground surface CGnteIIY intervals due to grading. I. 6. a. The improvements of 19th Sr, within the proposed limits will bring existing condition, up to par with e::i =_ting improvements extending west from Zircon Ave. and Eastward from Amethyst. As such there e;;ists potentials far increase in adjacent property values. I. 10.e Temporary not 5e increase during construction and potential long term not sn increase becau cre travel lanes wll! move closer io e:5lsu ny sLr u~iw ce. I. SU. g. Temporarv odors caused by road constr:_¢a ipn equipment and application a{ pavement. .. 12.f. There will be modif¢cat.i ons i't's the 19th SreeC St or'm Drain which are included in the proposed pro~ec± that will enhance existing contlitions. I.1?.1. The extension of the 19th Storm Drain 500 ft. to the west of its present teriminus, with ,addition antl/or relocation of exi sling catch basins between Dervl S't. and Hellman will req:.u re relatively minor incr eases in Storm Drain maintenance. In additron, there will be Future street maintenance nr!~=ds dlae to wrdened pavement antl the adoit~on o+ curds ana vdewaii s. Fiu wn veer .. will 6e a reducti nn in m.rrn t¢.n ante +or street drainages control and the w:i strng unr nq~roved rrght of way. I /~ Page III. DETEA4LNATION On cha boa is oP Chia ln1c1s1 evaluaeion: I find tha ¢roposed pro)ece COUID NOT have • aignif icon[ effect mn chs envlronmenc, and a NEGATIVE DELL IIUTION vill be prepared. _ I find that although the propoaed pro)ec[ could have a •Sgnificanc I I effect on the anviro~wen c, [hero v111 not bs a sign if Scan[ effect l.-1 Sn chla case becauas chs mf elgaclon mssaueas dsetribed on an •c ached shut have been added co the pro)ec c. A NECAIIVE DECLARATION WILL EE PREPARED. r--~ I find [hs propoaed pro)ect NAY have a algnif!can; affect on the ~~ envirnmenr, and an ENVLRO:RIENT L`(PACT REPORT Es required. SSgo//a~~cur• Ticla /1 CTT]' OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA - ~~ --- - STAFF REPORT '~``'~~ - DATE: May 3, 1989 1 -! I TG: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFiC re ques o c ange a propose oca ion o e nor eg of Red Hill Country Club Drive, from that shown !n the Foothill Specific Plan. The recommended plan is to realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of the present intersection with Foothill Boulevard, provide a median opening, and install traffic signals. Additional alternatives that include a raised, curbed median on Foothill Boulevard in order to eliminate left turns into and out of Red Hill Country Club Drive will be considered. RECDMENDATIDN: Staff recommends public hearing discussion of the proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment, including the additional alternatives. Attached are three different resolutions, one each for Alternatives A, h, or 6. The Planning Commlssi on recommended approval of Alternative 4. If the City Council finds one of these alternatives acceptable, the City Council should choose the appropriate resolution and adopt the amendment to Lhe Foothill 9ouleva rd Specific Plan. ABSTRACT; the existing skewed angle intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is to close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties with traffic flow an Foothill Boulevard. At the February 8, 1989, meeting of the Planning Commission, the study analyzing the reallamment of RaA Nill f.ntnt_ry rlilh nriyn !purr nn 1 wag presented to the Commission. The analysts considered four alternatives. The staff report based on the "fntersection Relacatlon Feasibility Study" prepared for the City by Austin-Foust Associates, Traffic Consultants, recommended that the proposed location of the north leg of RHCC Dr. and Foothill Boulevard intersection, as shown in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, be changed by realigning the north leg of RHCC Dr. to CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPGRT FSP 89-02 MAY 3, 1989 PAGE approximately 400 feet east of the present intersection. This was called Alternative 4. The Commission passed a resolution recommending Alternative 4 be adopted (with a multi-phase traffic signal allowing left turns from Foothill Boulevard on green arrow). At the March 15, 1989, meeting of the City Council, the Planning commission recommendation for the specific plan change was presented. After due consideration, the Council voted Lo refer the amendment back to the Comm ssi on to consider additional alternatives by including a raised, curbed median on Foothil'. Boulevard iii cyder to eliminate left turns into and out of Red Hill Country Club Drive. The "Intersection Relocation Feasibility Study" had orginal ly been prepared for the City by Austin-Foust Associates, Traffic Consultants, to analyze the existing intersection and four alternatives. The study has been expanded to include the analysis of the additional alternatives by including a raised, curbed median on Foothill 9oulevard that eliminates left turns into and out of RHCC Dr. The study comes to the same conclusion as before: The recommended plan proposes to relocate RHCC Or. to approximately 400 feet east of its present location, provide a media.^. break 1.^. the Fx*.hi 1 ] 9oulevard median 1 sl and, and install a two-phase traffic signal (no left turn arrows 1. The Planning Commission at the Aoril 12. 1989, meeting reconsidered the alternative realignments including those additional plans requested by Council. After considerable public input, the Commission passed a resolution again recommending that Alternative 4 be adopted (and again reaffirmed that the traffic signal include a left-turn green arrow for left turns from Foothill Boulevard). LOCATION: The study area included the existing intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive with Footh 111 Boulevard and alternative locations at the Sycamore Inn/San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue. The north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red Hill Country Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned Special fmm~arrial, The south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned Special Commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the railroad crossing is zoned Community Commerct al. Areas north and south of these commercial zones are zoned Residential. /' CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FSP 89-02 MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 3 A Saa Antor~io Community Hospital project is proposed in an office zone at the northeast corner of Focthitl Boulevard and Grove Avenue. BACKGROUND: Please refer to on ginal staff re ~Ort of March 15, 1989. ANALYSIS: Alternatives 5 and 6 have been added to the alternatives presented in the original staff report analysis. Alternatives 5 and 6 would construct a raised median in Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road as illustrated in Exhibits "A" and "B". No median openings would be provided except at the intersections of Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. The only difference between Alternatives 5 and 6 is that the intersection of RHCC Dr. is maintained in its present location in Alternative 5 while the realignment 400 feet easterly of RHCC Dr. is used in Alternative 6. Field investigation discloses 16 driveways presently exist on RHCC Dr. between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road which would be affected by these alternatives. Left-turn acce>s to and from these driveways, which is currently permitted, will be eliminated through the planned construction of a raised median. These 16 driveways will then arrmm~nda tw rinh+_hn rn_nnly mnunmunTc CmL nn ri nw rnunfc of hhc lcft_ turn volume in-and out of these 16 driveway5~discl osed that relatively little left turning presently occurs. Approximately 25 left turns (total in and out) mostly occurring at the driveways in the vicinity of Lhe Texaco station and Magic Lamp restaurant were observed. In addition, a major concentration of eastbound left turns (over 200 per hour) acc ur at RHCC Or. Construction of the raised median across Lhe RHCC Dr. intersection would cause these 25 left turns to become U-turns at the intersections of Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. However, the nominal increase in U-turns is not expected to significantly affect the level of service. However, the diversion of over 200 left turns per hour presently turning ieft from eastbound Foothill Boulevard onto northbound RHCC Dr. caused by the construction of a raised median is anticipated to create some 'iccifiCorit WiiCePiii. F6'r exdiTiuie. tfrc PGD ieft Uu'iiFK firnSiLi i,f itnfi.n residents of the Red Hill area, as well as commuters using RHCC Dr, and Alta Cuesta Drive as a "shortcut" between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road. Residents will be diverted east along Foothill Boulevard to Carnelian Street (Vineyard Avenue) or to the Sycamore Inn where they will use the existing private road to RHCC Dr. Commuters may be diverted to either of these two routes or they may change their travel patterns entirely and use Campus Avenue to avoid the Red Hill area altogether. It is difficult to estimate the exact number of commuters and residents that 1~9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FSP 89-02 MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 4 wilt take the various routes. However, with over 200 left turns per hour diverted from RHCC Dr., it is reasana ble to forecast that a number of them (perhaps as many as 50 per hour) will turn left into the Sycamore Inn's parking lot and use the existing private road for access to RHCC Dr. Although it is acknowledged that this volume is merely an estimate, it does indicate a potentially serious threat to this private oarkina tot. In addition, some residents may choose to make a U-turn at the Sycamore Inn and "backtrack" tc RHCC Or., rather than drive through the Sycamore Inn parking tot. IL seems doubtful that any commuters would backtrack in such a manner. They are my re likely to use the Sycamore Inn and private road, or proceed on east to Carnelian Street. In order to prevent the Sycamore Inn parking lot and adj scent private road from becoming a "through street", it may be necessary to construct some sort of gate across the pri vats road. Finally, even if the Sycamore Inn parking lot can be protected against becoming a by-pass route for RHCC Dr., the segment of RHCC Or. which intersects Carnelian Street will experience a significant increase in traffic as residents themselves are forced to use this entrance instead of Foothill 9o ul evard. In summary, closure of the left-turn access of RHCC Dr. and Foothill B culevard mold create potentially significant impact as traffic diverts through the Sycamore Inn's parking lot and/or increases substantially the existing traffic on the segment of RHCC Dr. west of Carnelian Street. Alternative 5 has one other potentially significant traffic impact. The present intersection of RHCC Or. and Foothill Boulevard is located less that 300 feet east of Grove Avenue. Westbound traffic often backups 9 to 10 car lengths (250 feet) during the peak hours, thereby, virtually blocking the present RHCC Dr. intersection. Right turning traffic exiting this intersection would encounter significant difficulty entering the westbound flow and find it virtually impossible to weave across three through lanes to enter the westbound left-turn pocket at Grove Avenue. Relocation of the RHCC Or, to a point 745 feet east of Grove Avenue (as shown in Alternative 4) would eliminate this weaving situation. Alternative 5 and 6 each raise one additional concern regarding circulation i. e., that of access for emergency vehicles to RHCC Dr. from eastbound on Foothill Boulevard. Since the fire department uses the l of f_f ~nr lene 't Pow Di fcr aaereencv aCLeii. it wuiiid be ,i h i:Nts arv }n provide a Brea kin the median for use by emergency vehicles only. This could presumably Include police and ambulance, as wel? as fire vehicles. This median opening would be signed for use by emergency vehicles only. However, continual police enforcement would probably be required to prevent its use by others. (~~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FSP 89-02 MAY 8, 1989 PAGE 5 Alternatives 5 and 6 both offer similar advantages and disadvantages, and these are sumnari zed below: Advantages (both Alternatives) 1. A substantial reduction in traffic is created on RH CC Dr., particui arty the southerly segment. 2. The cost of Alternative 5 is the lowest cost alternative. 3. Congestion at the RHCC Dr. and Foothill Boulevard intersection is practically eliminated except for Alternative 5 where severe difficulty would be encountered in the weaving maneuver between RHCC Dr, and Grove Avenue. Disadvantages (both Alternatives) 1. Residents are re-diverted to use the Carnelian Street entrance of RHCC Dr., thereby significantly increasing traffic on that segnent, as well as creating substantial out-of-d7recti on travel for residents. 2. Sycamore Inn's parking lot and the existing private read connection to RHCC Dr. is expected to become a substitute by- pass route as residents and Commuters alike divert to alternate routes. 3. A specially designed median opening would be necessary at RHCf, Dr. for use by emergency vehicles with continual law enforcement applied to ensure that it was not used 6y the public. Surmnary of Realignment Alternative Analysis: Investigation of the feasibility of relocating the intersection of RHCC Or. and Foothill Boulevard indicates not only that such is possible, but highly desirable since it will not only improve the traffic flow conditions on Foothill Boulevard, but provide a small but significant deterrent to continued commuter traffic use of the RHCC Dr, and Alta Cues to Drive "short cut" through the RHCC Dr. res{door{,1 ns °ix alt°.nat!ves 1 `1 ''° 4. oyes. asted. A~ternat~.~ realigning RHCC Dr. through ~a vacant lot 400 feet east of its present intersection with foothill Boulevard, clearly emerges as superior to Lhe others in nearly every respect. Three of the alternatives involve limited sight distance which, unless vastly improved, would itself render these alternatives unfeasible. Even if this restriction could be solved, and though substantial ~I CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FSP 99-02 MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 6 regrading to the Red Hill would be possible, the remaining advantages of the recommended alternative far exceed those of the other candidates. Two of the alternatives (5 and 61 involve potential use of the Sycamore Inn's pa rktng lot as a substitute by-Gass routing and a substantial diversion of residents' own travel patterns. Asa result, it is recommended that the City pursue an acquisition of a vacant parcel of land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard 400 feet east of RHCC Dr, for the purpose of relocating and realigning RHCC Dr. and si gnallzation of a new intersection located midway between two existing signals at Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue and at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. It is further recommended that full left-turn access be provided at the new RHCC Dr. and Foothill 9oulevard intersection and that this location be signalized and timed to discourage commuter use while at the same time permitting motorists to enter albeit encountering somewhat more delay than is currently experienced. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Same as original staff report. FACTS FOR FINp1NGS: Same as original. Respec ttul ly-mlvni tied, ~~, / jr i ~f~`q' __ r ~j Y Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes of the Apr11 12, 1989, meeting of the action for the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02 Exhibit "A" - Alternative 5 Exhibit "B" - Alternative b Staff Report of February 8, 1989 In-depth Engineering Study, updated March 29, 1989 Fi rr 0lctrirt Reyi aw lahier regarding fhg gAd7 sinnal al to rna Ll vas School District Review Letter regarding the additional alternatives / l ~ r renen s cou d restrict future leasing of the center. e a so con ed because both Chuck E. Cheese and Chan~ion Pizza had faile n Uplan he felt the use has more of a family arcade/fun center than a ily re staur and felt a more traditional family restaurant would b etter suited to area. She was afraid that extra cars and children de the restaurant cause exterior noise. She was not comforts 6le w' this use in this parti location. Commissioner Tols 'ndica tad that his aniy concern had b Oise. He felt the two conditions arding noise in the Resolution ld mitigate the noise. He felt other within the project were sma- and he didn't feel the use would generate parking problems. Commissioner Emer ick felt Sh would be a clea rand they would not be a nuisance to the nearby resid Chairman Mc Niel stated that this p lar Ler has a walking patrol twice daily. He did not feel there would of activity behind the hui ldi ng except for employees leaving at the a their shift in the evening. 4e supported the project but suggested applicant make their employees aware of the sensitivity of the coot oft ighbors Lo the south. Motion: Moved by Emerick, s ed by Tolsto to adopt the Resolution approving Environmental Asses and Con6itional Permit 89-03. Motion carried by the follading vo AYES: C~M1SSi0 NE BLAK ESL EY, ~!ERI CR, MCNI~ , NOES: COpMIS 5: CNI TI EA ABSENT: CC~SIO NERS: NDNE -carried Commissr Chitiea stated she opposed the project because of the tensive parki would require, the failure of similar restaurents in Up the des' or a mare traditional family restaurant, and the fear that use m' be a nuisance to the neighbor;. _ H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - - A request to consider additional a ternal L v~for e rea gnmen o the north leg of Red Hill Country Club Drive by including a raised, curbed median on Foothill Boulevard in order to el tminath left turns into and out of Red Hi11 Country Club Drive. Paul Rou geau, Traffic Engineer, presented the staff report, as well as letters from the Foothill Fire Protection District and Central School District opposing the installation of a median. Planning Commission Minutes -I1- April 12, 1989 /~ 3 Commissioner Bl akesley asked the expected timing for widening the railroad crossing on Foothill Boulevard. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, estimated ground would be broken in 18-2D months and con stn:ction would take 12-18 moms. He indicated Al terra to 1 would require another Lrussel structure , which would add to the time frame. Chairman PkNiel opened the public hearing. ~ ' Don Sol li tiger, representing San Mtonio Community Hospital, stated they had been trying to get the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan modified for over 18 Iman th i, iie idid They had piani fJ'i u'e'r ciJpiiiy thei property - prJC2 SS '"d he thanked the staff and Planning Commission ~ for looking at other alterr.a ti ve s. Gordon Zwissler, 1879 Sierra Vista, Ra tic he Cucamonga, felt too much attention had been given to looking for a quick fix. He said he had talked to other residents on Red Hill and they did not feel that prohibiting left turns from Foothill Boul eva:d would be advisable. He thought the road should be brought in across from San Bernardino Road. He felt parking could be added behind the Sycamore Inn to colryensate for any lost parking to the east. He wanted to get rid of the railroad. Joshua Warren, 7893 Alta Cuesta, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the traffic problem on Alta Cuesta has become intolerable. He felt Alternatives 5 or 6 offered a partial solution to the problem of through traffic and favored Alternative 5 because it was the least expensive. He felt people would not use the alley behind the Sycamore Inn because of the speed bumps. Pat Lewis, 8335 Camino Sur, Rancho Cucamonga, asked the Planning Commission to reaffirm Alternative 4, because shutting down the traffic for the convenie rc e of those living on Alta Cues to mane tt coo inc ~~Ve ment *or cne ocner residents on Red Nill. Ronda Ha tley sta*xd she had a townhouse project south of Baker, She wondered if residents would have to go to Carnelian and make a U-turn to get to her development. Wayne McLaughlin, 7939 Camino Predera, Rancho Cucamonga, supported Alternative 4. Oa ie Frisby, 7904 Yaile Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, supported Alternative 4. He felt the median would create other problems. John Eagle, 8508 Calle Queb rada, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the installation of a median wnpld adA 9.4 miles to his comnu te; and he supported Alternative 4. Helen Zwissler, 7879 Sierra Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, was concerned that emergency vehicles would be delayed in reaching residences on Red Hill if the median was installed. She supported Alternative 4. Planning Commission Minutes -12- April 12, 1989 /~ Elizabeth Galvin, 8166 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she owned the liquor store at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill. She felt it was not necessary to change the alignment and felt the City should only prohibit left turn lanes from Red Hill Country Club Drive onto Foothill Boulevard. Chairmen hY Niel asked how many add itirnal residents in the audie rc e had no new com~ents but were in support of Alternative 4. Approxi m3 tely 6-8 people railed their hands, Nearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Chairman McNiet asked the timing on the Ame ndnent. Mr. Rougeau responded that if the Planning Commission acted this evening, staff planned to take the matter to City Cou rk:il on May 3, Commissioner Chitiea stated she still favored the connection to Grove. However, because that option was not available, she felt Alternative 4 was best. She fe14 the issue of public safety was of paramount importance as expressed by the Foothill Fire Prevention District and the Central School Oistr ict. She wanted a left turn signal of reasonable, not minimal, length. Commissioner 8l akesl ey felt the current alignment created a problem because it was too close th Grove. He felt adding a median and leaving the streets in their current location would not solve any problems. He felt Alternative 6 would place a heavy burden on the intersection of Foethill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. He favored Alternative 4. Commissioner Emerick felt a significant burden would be imposed on residents of Red Hill by adopting Alternatives 5 or 6. He felt having to waft for a left-turn arrow with Alternative 4 would discourage some of the through traffic. Commissioner Tolstoy felt 4 was the on?y viable alternative, so long as a left wrn lane could be constrvc ~d long enough to accommodate the traffic. He felt it was not practical to require residents to go down the street and make a U-turn. He felt the letters from the Fire Protection District and 4hoo? District mould be considered. Chairman pY N1e1 felt that if a break was provided in the median for emergency C raffle, it would be used by residents and commuters as well. He felt the current transition on Foothill for vehicles turning left to go south on Grove and those turning left to go north on Red Hill Country Club Drive wen mo comp ac to C. He felt the conme nts from the residents tonight showed strong support for Alternative 4 and he also favored Alternative 4, Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by 8l akesley, to adopt the Resolution recommending Alternative A for the Environmental Assessment and Foothill Doulevard Specific Plan Amendment 89-02. Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes -13- April 12, 1989 /d AYES: CCMMISSiO NERS NOES: CONMISS IONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS . ~ + + . 10: .M. - Planning Coi .. . BL0.K ESL EY, CHIi1 FA, EMER ICK, MCNI E!, TOL STOY NONE WNE -carried mission Reconvened i. EN VIR O! h AL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11473 - LA - A su tv tst acres o an Into pa rce,s in the _ow ent ial be velopmen trio, located on the south side of Hamilton ~ et, east of Her mesa A - APN: 2G2-201-73. Betty Miller, Ass is to ivil Engineer, presented the staff ort. i Chairman N1c Niel opened t ub lic hearing. Danny Pierce, GVW Engineeri Inc., project engi said they agreed with the staff report and he was av ble to answer Lions. Terri Brooks, 10331 Orange Stre Rancho' ca monga, asked what type of reside rn:es would he canst we mod. S.. 5 ~ zrred that taxis ~~astes may have been dumped on the property in the p he was concerned because the site was next to a kind ergar 4.n and she to be sure dirt was kept under ~„~t.,,t and rho rhitA non r,nntd not PntPr the nro nerty. ShP stated traffic was congested in the and ~G would be int rea sed by the construction Lra ffic. Michael Jones, 10354 Mignone ~ Rancho Cucamonga, concerned about traffic congestion. He reques to ' Ingle story houses 6e st ni r, Led because the grading on the property higher than his adjacent h Mr, Pierce stated de. ed single family homes would be b but the homes had not been deli as yet. He said there was a block 1 next to the school and cons Lion fencing would be put up behind t ide wa lk, so children would have access Lo the site. Commission it iea asked when con strv coon vas projected to 6e i f the project ~ approved. Mr. Pi~ responded they hoped to begin in 4-6 months. Ch~lf~an Mc Niel asked if a soils report would be required Planning Co mnission Minutes -1 4- April 12, 1989 \ / A~ RESOLUTION N0. 89-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL 80ULEVARO SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02, REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHOWN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF THE PRESENT INTERSECTION WITH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, 9ASED UPON AN IN-DEPTH ENGINEERING STUDY. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application" (ii) On February 8, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application, (iii) On April 12, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted another duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comnissi on hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on February 9, 1989, and April 12, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby •f,r I1.• 4f nAn inlln a) The existing skewed intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard. The preferred realignment as shown in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is not feasible. A feasible ~d~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 85-47 FSP 89-02 -CITY OF RANCHO CUC AMONGA APRIL 12, 1989 PAGE 2 realignment has been determined by an in-depth traffic engineering study. The proposed play, is to realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of its 1 present intersection at Foothill Boulevard, b) The property on the north side of foothill Boulevard from Red Hi11 Country C7 ub Drive east to the Southern Pacific railroad _rn 5ci ~ is inns rf 5pcr ial Co^Ime nrial, The property on the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned special commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned community commercial. North and south of these commercial zones are residential areas. c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a sign n cant impact on cne environment nor cne surrou nu my properties. 3. Based up cn the substantial evidence presented to Lhis Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and cl That the orooo sed amendment is in conformance with the Ge ne rai Fian; and d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. IBS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUT fON N0. A9-41 FSP 89-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 12, 19A9 PAGE 3 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Comm ssion recommends the issuance of a Negative ~D eclaration by the Li ty Council. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. A9-02 on the 12th day of April, 1989. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of April, 1989, by the fol lowf ng vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; BLA KE SLE Y, CHITiEA, EME RICK, MCNI EL, TULSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOME ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NOf1E C7' ... e'~-, ._ :- ; - _'> -' .,.. -k _, 1 _. h i, ~~ ---~ __ , 1 , s~ ( ` ~ .. _ --- ~t ~ / ~ ~ ! ,\ " J ' 1 : ~~ i 4 `~ ~ ~. 1 x 2 W D ? -_~ ' // ~~~ !~ // ~ / '~II~ ~, ~ ~ li ,~ i T ~~ { 1 i = ~~ ' ~~ I f C 1 I ~ • n ~ ~ ~_ g a ~~ •~ 1: ~. .iL.'T " - ' -- . ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ • ,- n ~ a ° ~ ~~ ~ / . ~ ' . ' i , : w Rio '~ A9 ~ ,- ~~~ 1 C4 ~ yt Q[~~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~S~ ` ~~=0 I ~ ~ ~ ~ q i ! ~ '~1 '' _~_ , A :: `_ ~ ~ "` ~: ... .` ~' ._ ~= i - ,- .^ •,,, .} . ~ • ~ `~ ~ ~ . M i~ F y n a z n o~ ~ ~y ~~ j I / ~ _`~ B ~ i ly! -- _ ~~. ~., ~~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ -~ ~; , ~~ ~ ,.o ~ y' / ~ d ~ v ~ ~~ i ~ i/~(// ~/~/ ~ \ ~\\\ ~~ ' f =~~ ~ _ ~i, d '~__ ~t'- .. ... i~ :> ~ -~~ 1 -- _~ ~ ~ _~ •- ~ "=t 13 ~ ... X _2 ~ ~ e __.,~ ~ n ~~. /•~ ~ 9f ` ~~ ~i ;;i \ ii~ ~~~~ a RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION RELOCATIOA' FEASTBIL ITY STUDY Prepared far. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA Prepared by Austin-Foust Associates, loc. 1450 North Tustin Aveaue, Suite 108 Saata Aaa, Ca:ifamia 927CI ~-_\ , March 29, 1989 /~v Ll ~ TADLE OF CONTENTS Paae Intrcductia¢ Stethodology Ezisti¢g Conditions 2 Ide¢uficano¢ oY Alternative Alignments 6 Analysis of Baker Extension q Analysis of Sycamore Inn Alternatives lp Analysis of Vacant Pazcel Alternative lp Analysis of Raised Median 12 Simulated Trattic Flow Analysis 17 Analysis of Ezistiog Intersection Locatio¢ lg ProhiCitio^ of Lef[-turns at Red Hill Cou¢try Club Drive ,~,p Summary and Recommendation 21 LIST OF FIGURES F'Yll!e NC. Vicinity Map Peak Haur Volumes Realignment Alternatives Sycamore Ion and Baker Street Alternatives Recommended Plan Alternative 5 Alternative 6 Appepdix /33 ~ ~~ IVTRODCCTIOY The Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted a study of the feasibility of relocation of the ir,tersec;icn of Red Hit( Country C:ub Drive (RHCCD) and Foothill Boulevard (SR-fi6). Red Hiik Cemtry Club Drive intersects with Alm Cuesta Drive forming a continuous link between Base Line A':enue and Foothill Boulevm d. Both RHCCD and Alta Cuesta Drive are typical b+~c- iane residential streets. The existence of the connection creates a 'by-pass' routing Cor commuter traffic to avoid a somewhat longer trp involving ei[her Carnelian Street o¢ ;he east, or Campus Avenue on the wes[. No other connection is available for motorists to travel from Base Line Avenue to Foothill in the one mile segment 6etwee¢ Carnelian Street and Campus Avenue, causing RHCCD/ARs Cuesta to be used az a'short-tut.' In addition to the commuter 'by-pazs" characteristic oC [rave? patterns on Red Hill Country Club Road, it's connection with Foothill Boulevard creates a skewed intersection which is also in cruse prozimiry to an existing signal at Grove Avenue. "fhe combinatio¢ of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates opera[ional problems with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard and eCCectively makes unfeasible any type of traffic control other than the existing two-way stop condition at the present location of RHCCD and Foothill Boulevard. The purpose of this analysis is to investigate potential reloca[ion/realignment of the m~ersecuon to eetermme it such is feasible, and i( so, is sig¢alization passible, and what impact would relocation and signalization have on commuter use of the Red Hill Country Crab/Alto Cuesta by-pass. NETHODOC9(zY The methodology utilized Car this study involved the preparation of a computer t2fiis model which simulated existing traffic flow conditions on Foothill Boulevard and evaluated the e C(ect on traffic Clow if the inttrsection were to be relocated and signalized. The traffic model employed in a widely accepted computer program sponsored by Caltrans. an known u TR.4NSYT-'F (TRA(Cic Nawork Study Tool). In additio¢ to the computerized signal analysis of potential sates (or relocating the intersection was evaluated through a combination of (field observation sod a0-stole conceptual design engineering, /3~ 1 N -~~ ECTSTiyG CO~DITiO~`; The 3eneral vicinity of the study area along with the specific locatior, of RHCCD and Alta Cuesta Drive are illustrated in Figure 1. Existing peak hour traffic volumes at critical inteaecicrs along Foothill Boulevard are shown ir. Figure ~, Table 1 presenrs typical Ceak hour vo;vaes and ADTs in the study area. The ezhtence of several topographic features, such as the Cucamonga Canyon Wash. [he Sou[herr, Pacific Railroad, and the Red HiII Counvy Club combine to effectively limit rrculation between Base Line and Foothill Boulevard to the RHCCD/AIta Cuesta Drive connexion. The City haz examined this condition and holds out hope that [he situation can he at least partially mitigated through redesign of the Foothill Boulevard/RHCCD intersection. However, AFA's subsmntia! experience in residential vaffic conrial of similaz residential st: ees suggests that short of installation of some type of 'diverter' on the route, it appears doubtful chat any major reduction of traffic can be achieved. However, though relocation oC the intersection and sigoalization, a form of 'metering" can occur which reduces current peak hour trai fic and tends to 'hold the Iiae' against any further increases in the future. Foothill Boulevard is presently striped with four travel lanes, and a left-turn median. Traffic signals exist at two intersections: Grove Avenue and the Saa Bemardiao/Sycamore Inp Driveway. The inmrsection of Baker Avenue and Foothill Boulevard is currently stop sign coot: elled itwo way), but sigoalization is planned in future year 1989/1990. The total distance between these two intersections is 2,750 feet (1,545 fee[ between Grove and Saa Bernardino, and I,~00 feet between Baker and San Bernardino). Cltimately, Foothill Boulevard is -lanned as a six-lane divided highway. Sufficient width currently ezisn between Grove Avenue and Sao Bernardino Road to permit implementation of the six-lane cross-section. East of San Bernardino Road, Foothill Boulevard narrows to pass uaCer the railroad tracks which permits only four-travel lanes. Plain are currently underway to widen this uadercrossing with design in future year 19$9/1990, and construction beginning in future yeaz 1990/1991, Red Hill Country Club Drive is a typically Darrow two-lane winding residential-type roadway which traverse a steep grad[: uD what is locally known v 'Red Hill' north of Foothill Boulevard as it meanders around the golf course and through the residential area and transitions into Alta Cuesta Drive. Although the alignment of RHCCD is curvalinear throughout its ennrc length, a significant curve exists in the alignment adjacent to the golf course 300 feet seu!h of the Caae Cuabe intersection. This curve is significant since its existence /3 S 2 ~~„ i ~-Z -. •' _ _~V .~..i s )~Y9~~1~ NV l 3N ~w~ ~.w Ae -, nb ~. I !~ ~~.' ~-.y ~ i - . Ybrvl'3M ~ ~~ :, ~•+ `\. ' , ~ ~ s cis, ? T ~ i Yd! : a ~" . . i:io-.. s+.'~ 'oo~^ I \. :cc. 3 1 v ,.~. I \ ~_ ~.eiat y p N el Y. .a. ~~ ~ _. 43e ttiL ' o ` S-~ i I r \~v.ss w.~ ~ °_ c c , i a ;j ~~ ~ ~_~ ~j 4J •3 Y. . nj\I ~ Li :i.. ~ n r g ~d;l•i~„s" P j~ . .i i r it g3 ±.; g ~.;Y jij iiijt C 8 x,. >n ` ~ ~~~ , _1% ~ya ,J r F 1J rvsm ~ G 'd ~ ~ ~ ~' zt- N .J ~ ~88 ~~- a~~ ~ ~ ~ iq ~a '', _.~ ~ m ~~ > , ~ r I ~ ~.. ..~ _ 1S N711 ~Nb7~ ., ;se ~ y ~~ J ~:\ ~.F 3 - - u..-.~ `~ al~.t i~3 .rm ~ jji3; IC -n. u~~a))gv I e ~ ~ Y151n,~Ytlni(S •_ ~'K I¢ ..,5 ~m J ~d Sin 3'•lvn. I' -ij-~~3 nv 1 •_ _, ..,,,e ~ ~ ,..~ ~r. \ey 5~~3nJ 3 Ylry/ S y1 `JS ~ • a I ~5 ..i~~~]..w Ic ~~ f rr ,~' aN3n9 ~ 1~ 1'~ bi ~.~~-' ~r 1 r ~ 1145 V~.n~ 41sv7 3~~ _ I ~ j \~dr _'r u _ ri z~I~7 3r 6?C ~ 31t iLFJ I C'le;lAp Od" A'T'~,t~~ n• -•w_.ra = ~ nv 34tl3n 31NOFl i~_, ~^1~~„~r ",~% „~ M~5! 1 .~ ~ ~ • _-G- Rlr + ' - 5. ° ll~ ~j Ci"mss I _r1,~ ~ y N .a ;:.a'~~t~» q ;#« p 5 ' 3 z ~x~ ,^"`°'v`.'$~ e ~ ~~~t _ "3e .~ ddb T V')°-•(?:~ id --` '~ii1 :Imaoaw :-ti __ a~_I._Z ~ :SIT ~'~', r .~W.cmnw F Ji~1N019NItyp f, nv .NI ;e~~~ I nYa~ ull - ':`3 i I y snrN : = S "g"' 'L^JJ ~ ,tr .ISa w i nY .~l +~01 --a ~ dy~ o8il+9 li > y'nv 6 a.F~2 __ K $~ ~ J' 4°"°Im f I ::918 N ~ xs g III ..e . .! .'~j $ nl .~'.du3ro.N l: t1. yea Hb FI "ice-. ~I ~ 1 .u ,;y...1 a nv.5 <: _t-`'"- ' ,sl°~.^~ Its! ~,a,. I ,.s I •~~ ~',. ~ ~ nr sl.Nrm i0 NOlsnim ~2'I3 nv ..v f~: ~ ni,: ~.njl -..•_:ws _~ 7 5 -ny .. Lwf-.l. i. _'d a.i __.'.: »1. ~: ,i 1!: y3 .y .,~~IM ~~i ~ ' nr ai\t3~s' gl I j ~I n4 ~n~ C 8 ~ o~G ~~. v .~~~ I $ \v sl ';, I ~~y ~ ~ yy ~ x, _ ~ ts~ /3cP H - ~' i M N 7 O Y N 7 _ ~ 3z'_RA I - ~~/ ~ ~~ ~ C Z Z ~ ~ ~. ~_ _/ ~- ~Y~ Z it - ~. ~ ~ ~ I, __ o ~ ~ / a L y .~ h G _'s°~~~ ,~ ~ra~~'r - ay } ~~ely z~ ~ ~ ^~ ~- ~5 C yp ~ ~ _ f` • e ~e ~"~~~ J _ ~ R I- ~ !~yy~~,,,, O ^~.-G=F u ~ l z ~ ~ \ N W ~ r ~-i • ~ ~ $ p 4 ~~ ~y ~ r~ Y ~` r ~ gg '° ~ .,n =R 2 ? 7 o _ ' . ~~ IyyY ~ ' ^ W ' IS y F li o,~ W ~ . ; 1 . ". ° N S 8 a~ a N ~ a ~ ~ ~ _ W W ` ~ ~ ~ a W of ~ 3 N N .°-i ~ " o vi W W i i u V Y _ C r ~ ; C 'V ~ z ~_, E 8 8 2 o e o 0 0 0 W W ~ N N i P a 2 ! 7 5 N ~7 severely limits the sight disance of ar.y driveway and;or potential inmrsec;ions in c;ese proximity to this curve. Several of the alternative RHCCD realignment options ;ontem plate the use of an existing narrow private drive which conr.eca to the Sycamore [nn parking !ot an7 Focrhiil Boulevard via the signal at San Bernardino Sycamore Inn Driveway. Another oD[ion w ,uld ;ontinue this linkage with Foothi!I Boulevard along :he base of the hillside to connect at . Baker Avenu=. The existence of this curve is significant, because without majoc realignment oC either RHCCD or the private roadway through the hills along with substantial earthwork, adequate sight distance for the potential intersection cannot be achieved. IDE VTIF?CATIOV OF ALTER~IATIx'E ALIGti11ENTS Figure 3 illustrates the Ootentiaf alternative alignmenn investigated. It should be Doted that three of these alignments contemplate use of an existing private street which connects RHCCD with ;he Sycamore Inn's parking lot. The fourth alternative envisions connecting RHCCD with Foothill Boulevard through a vacant parcel of land. This anemative would create a new intersection situamd half way between Grnve Avenue and San Bernardino Read/Sycamore Inn driveway. In adtlition to the four alternatives shown in Figure 3, two other alternatives were examined, These two alternatives simply involve comtructiop of a raised mediae on Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. Alternative 5 retains RHCCD in its present location, while Alternative 6 relocates RHCCD to that proposed in .4 iternative 4. The first three alternatives all involve expanding an existing private roadway intersection !oared southerly o(a right-hand curve (as viewed by southbound traffic) aDDroximately 300 feet south of Celle Ganbe. Figure 4 illustrates these alternative. L'tiliaation of this private roadway in its present configuration and alignment h pot feasible, since adequate sight distance Cor the intenectioo cannot be provided without substantial regrading and realignment of the ,. H.r,.r.D e,.-: £. n ..iaG, a.u u'i~ii[iir4 This sivhi distance iimim[inn is nrnvirir_A in rh_r Fivnrn 4 In aCdition, the private roadway, which is only 20 to 22 feet in width, would have to be widened by a minimum of 12 feet or more to satisfy minimum design criteria for a residential street. Presuming [hat the adequate sight Qistaace could be provided around the curve o0 RHCCD, the resulting alignments would be similar to that depicted in Figure 4. This Figure aiustretes the minimum curve radii to achieve the absolute minimum design speed of 25 miles per hoar However, use of a ~5 h1PH design speed cannot 6e recommended since speeds coming /3~ 6 ~l t-'~ ~y i~W Q ~~~~ ~y i~wy y; z w ' ~~_ _ v ! J \ -nor Z -. !t ~ \~ -r,~ Z / t 1~ - ._ r-i ~Ly y7~ I. rf -ly _ ,~ ~, ~ _, . y y ~ C ~ C~ d \ \ i\ .~ i\ _~ zld 1d~ •w ~ ~ Qj¢ ~d~ ~. I y':-~' \ \~1~~ N~ J p ^ Ytiy~ `~r'l~ n K~ n M ~l ..'J y =3 ~4. Q y / O zy~ Q J t L,~¢ ~ J" s WW ' y ~ ~i p ~ r5V w~s0 > a TTT yyy ~. ~ ` ~ : © - N n 1 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ X22 zfa ~1 v ~ G':~ ! ~ ~i ~ Jy ~ ~. i a u_I s _ w~ \ ~.~ W i7 ,. ,~ ,I L ~ //~ ~ •~ l ~ .L~ b\ w z_ ~! b ~~ ~ W ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~'~ y~ w ~ t1c ~\ ~ ~Ci~i '~ r' nn~p alb ~•. i ,'. s ,. ~- ;; II y ~ is n \ ' `~--/ ~ ~ ~a ~ a ~ ~ ;I :Y - ~ / li iq 3 ;~~~ ' I; ~~, ^~ ~~/<<f i .f; ' it, i f~ //,~ __ ~ ~ ,~ ~_ r~. I ~ f i ~' 8 -~wz- j ~ ~,,\ /j /~l ' ' _. \~\ ~ ~/ H . G r u_! NI OI ni N 7 r ~i 0 down the Red Hill grade would tend to e.ccess 25 MPH unless the motorises were to 'ride the brakes' to slow their vehicles. A mere reasonable and realistic minimum design speed would have to to 35 MPH, Cut such is virtually impossible to achieve without wholesale regrading of the hillside. ' A ~%A LYSIS OF BAKER EXTE~'O„ION (ALTERVATIYE I) Presuming that the problems of sight distance and minimum design speed can be overcome, and analysis was conducted of what would be the effect on traffic flow ora Foothill boulevard iC Baker Avenue were extended [o [he north. Perhaps the most significant advantage is that ty-pass traffic coming from the west could be encouraged to proceed an to Carnelian Street rather than use RHCCD since it would involve some backtracking, albeit a minor amount. This 'advantage' is offset by three significant disadvantages. These are: The existing railroad under-crossing ilmi[s the width oC Foothill Boulevard to four narrow travel lanes. The existing bridge makes the installa[ioo of ao eastbound left- turn on Foothill Boulevard at Haker difficult since the roadway is limited to four nave; lanes through the undercrosing. Providing the eastbound lift-turn lane far a sufficient distance to accommodate the left-turns could reduce the travel lane widths to nn unaa ti<farrnrv rnndirinn Ir ie rnrnvni>nd that rhla mnd b:nn wm,ld nnr .>ler in the future condition after Foothill Boulevard has bee^ widened to its ultimate width. However, although tentative bridge widening studies are underway, no firm date is set Cor cens[ructicn. Therefore, the relocation of RHCCD would 6e contingent upon completion ei the railroad bridge widening. -. Relocating [he RHCCD intersectiop east of the railroad undercrosing increases the trafF;c volume oa Foothill Boulevard in this critical Darrow Cour-lane section by about 4,000 ADT. This would have significant negative impact on traffic (low in [his area. 3. The cost oC constructing RHCCD under the railroad would he quite costly, much more so than any other alternative. /~ v N ~I 9 An'ALYSiS OF SYC>NOPE IyN ALTERV 4TIVE5 (ALTER NATIVES 2 and 3) Premming the sight distance and grading problems at the RHCCD/private road intersection can be overcome, the trade-offs involved with realigning RHCCD around the Sycamore Ina waz evaluated. The primary advantage would be tha[ the new RHCCDrFoothill Boulevard intersecr'en wcu:d become simply as expansion of an existing (our-way intersection and the -__nt e4o oA ...._. ___..-.. 'Cm..._'n ab~g..f,... !. ... .. .Sod .n...:3t L....'. .. nom. : eatcd. '.•>.^. Another advantage is that unlike for the Baker Stree[ alternative, (Alternative 1) Foothill Boulevard could be restriped to siz lanes permitting the additional 4,000 ADT from RHCCD to he accommodated immediately. This advaarage is counter-balanced by a number of disadvantages. These include: 1. The existing Sycamore Inn parking facilities are separated from the building by a ^ew roadway. This in effect creates an oft-site parking lot with its associated pedestrian safety concerns as patrons would have to cross a roadway with over 4,000 ADT. _. Although m....mum design speed (35 biPH) of 35 SSPH cannot to obtained. The 'best" Cosign speed achievable is 25 MPH which should not be acceptable. 3. Even a minimum roadway width (36 feet) creams serious disruptions of the existing ,,^.arkir.g far.iiry. S. Tito right-o(-way acpuisition necessary for these al[ematives is substantial. >v'>Ly' i~ OF Vq ALIT PAR A T utu e~rrvx (ALTERIJATIVE 4) The Courth alternative evaluated involves realigning RHCCD from its present location appro zimately 400 fret easterly through a vacant lot on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. _ iirn.mnv. h < e.mm..e. o...,........,e.n m......w ., r:....__ < n:- _i._~_.:.._ . .._ _.. _..__.. _ .._ ____..._ ..._ .._- ................. .,.... ,.,,.. ,.. ,...... ,. ... ,ate .. .,,... o..~,~.,..~ offers a number of advantages. These include; 1. "fhe minimum acceptable design speed of )5 MPH with adeQUate intersection sight drstana un 6e achieved. (Assumes superelevation.) /~3 ._ ;, i~ t= ,,. e ~ a ;,, _' . = :,: ,,. .. •~~ ~\ :.'~. ~,.. ~~ .~ r 1= ,~ ~ _ ~ i; \", ;n ` . ~,.. . ~~ ~~ ~~ 1 ~- ~ ~ ~ pr ~, ~ ~, / ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~_ ~ ~~,. ' ~~y~ - -~z-: ' ~I 3 ~, ~ _-~ ~ ~~-„ .. fe R~ t! f ~ ~!FD~ % '~ ~ ~ ~ -__._. .. ~ ~- 2 .__. ._~_ ___ «- a ___ .__.. __ x- y ~ i ~.---- yr ..on~ ~ / ~ ~ t J Y ~ ~' _~?~ ..~z _. A computerized simulation oC the ;nffic pvera tion of the resulting signal system indicates the prcposed inteaec;ion spar.ng will far'li tare the mcvement of through traffic on Foothill Bo Wecard •sithout hoc k:ng trot F.c into ad; scent incersec:ions and a good coordinated signal progression can to achieved. (The result on ;he TRANSYT- -F aamp;:;er analysis is included in the ACCe ndiz )~~: In addition, although the .._..,: ~n would permit signaiiza dcn of RHCCD 3[ Foothill Haulevard, the i. Relocating the proposed RHCCD intersection 760 feet east of Grove Avenue (it is currently 360 feet east of Grove Avenuel will improve traffic Elow on Foothill aouievard. a, The proposed new signal at RHCCD and Foothill Boulevard could as az a 'meter' for li;siting traffic onto northbound RHCCD, while this would not preveat commuter use, it would severely limit such use and act as a deterrent to continued Eumre increases. c The right-of-way acquisition required i5 limited to one parcel, the least of any ite: nauve ander consideration. 4~4LYSI5 OF RAISED x1EDIAV (ALTER VATIVES 5 sad 6) Ai:ernattt es 5 and 6 would construct a raised median in Foothill Boulevard between Grove >tenue and San Bernardino Road as iilustcated in Figures ti and i. No medtan openings would to provided e.ccep[ at the intersections of Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. The only difference in Alterative 5 and b is that the intersection of RHCCD is maintained in its present Learon (Alternative 5), rather than being relocated 400 feet easterly az proposed in A~;err.ative 4. 4in1,1 •n,r~e •.nn~.nn A:.nln.~. ,L .l-:..n....... .i.. -..' .- n.tnn~ ,. .. r ..-._ .... • e_ ..,,. ,,...~.,,.., ,., ,., ~.~.. ara v~caauq eeu. w. anx. x.~ uetween vruve hvenue sr.d San Bernardino Road which would be effected by these alternatives. Left-turn access .o fr:m ;here ~rneways, which is currently permitted, would be eliminated through construction ' the m•sed medtan. These 16 drive•.vays would, in ei fect, accommodate right-turn-only ve h:r,::ar movements. Peak period counts of the Ieft•turn volume in/out of these 16 driveways ..•-dcse.: :oat rean~ely little felt turning presently occurs. A total of approximately :5 leit- ;crns ~~:~:ai in and out) mostly occurring a the driveways m the vicinity of the Texaco station f 1 r r r .a. .. ~~ b e, __ ; ~ ~ ,.. :,~- ~ ~~ ~o [0 ! ` pe MM ~y ~y Y Pfi ~ Q ~ ~ .. _ :~ ~' e ~i w ~i`~ - _ ~ ~~.: ~'~~ 3 ~~ /, ~ _~ /~ ~ t' j E / , ', E '~ r ,, -. , -,: ~~ ~~ k ~- >. ~. i i ~ I . ~; .n. ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. • ~ ~ Y 1 ~ ~ t .ev i /~T , .,. ,~ ~ ; o ; °~' s .~;: - ~~ , ~~ ; ~ IS ~-~ ' ~-i fi F ~ i 2 R5~ ` ;~ . ~ ~ ~ ift` f , ~~' ' , p : E C ~ ~ e ~ -. ~ n~ ' = S ~ ~ ~ ~ \ rs , : ~~~, _ YII ,; e $~ i _„3, n r i ~ f E -J~. ^ i w ~ , ! . _7 ~ ~~ *~ ~ ~ ~, -- ~1~ _ c, a ~ ~ i II r3 _ / I~f~ ~ ~ !{ie i \ ; / ~~~ , // h, ~,'_ l ~ i /~ ~ / ' ~_ J ~ a -s 4 / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ - /~ E - ` ' f ~_ / ' ' ~ !. /i - i :~ ,. san ~' ~ y .. ~ , I K ~. ~ '..: i • f e w ww , • .. L,.(/ I l a .a. i and tifagic Lamp restaurant were obse rued. In addition, a major roncenvation of ess:bound i±ft-turn_ lover 20C per hourl occur at RHCCD, COnStfaCapn of the raised median would oau=se ..hose .5 ~2ft-turns to become L'-;u,•ns at the lore rsec [ions of Grove Avenue and San He; nardino Read. However, other than the incamenience c: eared for access toi from local businesses by .`.a•.;ag ro make L-turns at either of the two signalized intersections, [he ncminal inaeue :n C-;:: rs :; ou e.vpec:ed :o sigaifiwatl'y effect the level of service. Hcwever, the diversion of ova: 200 left-tut^s per hour presently turning left from eas[hound Foothill Boulevard onto northbound RHCCD caused 6v the constracron of a raised median is anticipated to create same agnificant concerns. For example. the 200 left turnea consist of both resident of the Red Hiil area, as well az commuters using RHCCD/Alto Cues;a Drive as a "shortcut" between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road, Residen[s will be diverted east along Foothill Boulevard to Carnelian Street (Vineyard Avenue) or to the Sycamore inn where they will use the existing private road to RHCCD, Commuters may be dive; red ;o either of these two routes or they may change their travel patterns en[irely and use Campus Avenue to avoid the Red Hiil area altogether. It is difficult to estimate with any prevision the exact number of commuters and residents that will take the various routes. However, with over 200 left-turns per hour diverted from RHCCD, it is reuonable to forecas[ that a number of them (perhaps as many as 50 per hour) will turn lef[ into [he Sycamore Inn's parking lot and use the existing private read Car access to RHCCD. Although it is acknowledged that this volume is merely an estimate and not one which is to 6e regarded with a nigh degree of confidence, it does, nevertheless, indicate a potentially serious threat to this pr.vare parking tot. (n additton, some residents may choose to make a L'-turn at the Svcamore Inn and 'backtrack' to RHCCD, rather than drive through the Sycamore !nn parking lot. It seems doubti ul lhat any commuters would backtrack in such a manner. They are more likely to use the Sycamore Inn and private road, or proceed on east [o Carnelian Street [n order to present the Sycamore Inn parking lo[ and adjacent private road from becoming a 'thru street", may be necessary to conseruct some son of gate across the privam road. Finally" even iF the Sycg more !^ ,ark~~ - _, b• p ••d •: bccpm:-- _ ~~ ..g L _ _ __._ ..g,..ns. .,, a b, „ route for RHCCD, the segment of RHCCD which intersect Carnelian Street wilt experience a signuinnt ,ncrease in traffic az residents themselves are forced to use this entrance instead of Footh di Boulevard. In summary, both Alternatives 5 and 6 are expected to creme inconvenience for crammer: ~al properties fronting on Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino 1~8 > s H ~7 Road as 16 existing full access driveways are restricted to right-turn-only movements by construction oC a raised median. However, the relatively minor number of left-turns into/out oC these driveways (i.e., less than 23 per hour) are not expected to cause a caRaci[y problem at Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road where a like number of U-turns will take place. Closure oC the~lef[-turn access of RHCCD and Foothill Boule4~rd is expected to create potentially significant impacu az traffic diverts through the Sycamore Inn's parking lot and/or increases substantially the existing traffc on the segment of RHGCD west Carnelian Street. Alternative 3 has cne ocher potentially significant traffic impact. The present intersection of RHGCD and Foothill Boulevard is located less thw 300 feet east of Grove Avenue. Westbound traffic is estimated to backup 9 to IO lengths (230 Ceet) during the Deak hours, thereby, virtually blocking the present RHGCD intersection. Right turning traffic exiling this intersection would encounter significant difficulty entering the westbound flow and find i[ virtually impossible to weave across three thru lanes [o enter the westbound left-turn pocket at Grove Avenue. Relocation of the RHGCD to a point J00 feet easterly (as shown in Alternative a) would eliminate this weaving situation. Alternative S and 6 each raite one additional concern regarding circulation -- i.e., that of access for emergency vehicles to RHCCD Crom eastbound on Foothill Boulevard. Since the fire department uses the left-turn lane ar RH(-f'Tf rn. w _ ,.~dn [...._ provide a break in she median for use by emergency vehicles only. This could prezuma6ly include police and ambulance, az well as fire vehicles. This median opening would be signed Cor use by emergency vehicles only. However, continual police enforcement would probably be required to prevent its use by others. Alternatives 3 and 6 both offer similar advantages and disadvantages, and these are summarized below: Advantages (both Alternatives) I. A suMtantial reduction in tnCfic is created on RHGCD, Darticularly the southerly segment. .. The cost of Alternative 3 is the lowest cost alternative. 3. Congestion at the RHCCD/Foothill Boulevard intersection is pnc[ically eliminated except for Alternative 3 where severe difficulty would be encountered in the weaving maneuver between RHGCD and Grove Avenue. ~~9 16N ~ Disadvantages (both Alternatives) I. Residents are re-diverted to use the Carnelian Street entrance, thereby significantly increasing traffic on that segment, az we(1 az creating substantial out-o(-direr:ioa travel far residents. ?, Sycamore Inn't parkil•g lot and the existing private road conn!ction to RHCCD is expec!ed to become a substitute by-pazs route as residents and commuters alike divert to alternate routes. 3. A unique specially destined median open would be necessary at RHCCD for use by emergency vehicles with periodic and continual law enforcemen[ applied to ensure it was not used by residents and commuters. ~. Considerable inconvenience and circuitous travel would be encountered in accessing 16 existing commercial driveways located on Foothill Boulevard az these driveways were converted Crom what is currently, in effect, full access to right-turn-only. Si~iL'LATED TRAFFIC FLOW ANALYSIS In addition to a geometric evaluation of relocating the intersection of RHCCD with Foothill Boulevard, an analysis of the impact on existing traffic flow conditions was conducted. To assist in this analysis, a computer traffic flow simulation program TRANSYT-7F, was unhzed. Existing AM and PSt Deak hour traffic volumes were utilized for analytical purposes. The existing five-phase signal operations on Foothill Boulevard at Grove Avenue and at San ~.-_.-•~_' ..^,oad arc r:a:cW. :.t.. _. _.. ~ ,. .. ~~ ...... ....... r" ...~-yurc ;:yw. t..c., uu ac Vsuic iciv-ww euuwa uuw RHCCD) was analyzed at a location midway between the Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road intersections. The results oC this analysis are presented in the following table. Additional in[erpre[ation of the results indicate that in order to provide satisfactory level of service in the PM peak hour, three (3) emtbound travel lanes are necessary. [o addition, unless a separate left-turn phase is provided far emtbound Foothill Boulevard to northbound Red Hill Country Club Road, the existing peak hour demand of 20B VPH will be limited to a maximum of about 160 left- turns per hour. This will effectively function u a "meter" restricting the number of commuters using RHCCDjAita Cuesta Drive az a by-pms routing between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Avenue. Further review of the computer flow simulation reveals that the maximum queue length of trai Fic backed up on Foothill Boulevard behind the signal at Grove Avenue will be 12 to 16 cars for eastbound traffic. This situation will occur during the PM peak hour. The maximum /~ 17 ~ ~. degree of saturation Clow on Foothill Boulevard will be 73 Dercen[ of capacity indicating a level of service 'C" can be achieved. Analysis of a four-lane cross section on Foothill Boulevard indicates that during the PM y peak hour a maximum saturation Clow rate of 114 percent of capacity will occur a[ Foothill Boulevard at RHCCD indicating an unacceptable overcapacity condition will exist. To mitigate [his condition, either the signal a[ RHCCD must be eliminated, or a third eastbound "thru' lane must be provided. [t is recommeoded that Foothill Boulevard be restriped to provide six (6) travel Lanes in the segment between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. The fallowing Table 2 indicates the standard Measures OF performance Evaluation (MOEs) produced by TRAiVSYT-7F for 90 and' 100 second cycle lengths with both two and three eastbound travel lanes. As indicated, a 90-second cycle length without double-cycling the new two-phaze signal at RHCCD produces the best results (i.e., average intenectioe delay of 23 seconds per vehicle). Although a 90-second cycle is about the maximum reasonable length far a two-phase intersection, very li«le pedestrian traffic is anticipated, and pedestrian violatioe of the Tong cycle is not anticipated. This long cycle does provide the deterrent for use of RHCCD by cammuten. J V Jr V~CTC rlC CYrCTrNn r,VT000Drnnwl One of the questions which determines whether or not signalization of the existing intersection of Foothill Boulevard and RHCCD is Ceasible is the need for "back-to-back" left- turn storage between the two locations. A good rule of thumb of estimating the left-turn storage requirement at a signalized intersection says to provide "one-foot of left-turn storage for each Deak hour left-mrn vehicle plus 25 feet' The source of this guideline is recommended practice published by the Institute of TfanaDOrtatlnR Engineers (ITE). Examination of Figure 2 indicates a peak hour volume of IOg westbound Taft-turns on Foothill Boulevard a[ Grove Avenue and 208 left-turns per hour on eaztbound Foothill Boulevard at RHCCD. In order to provide adequate left-turn storage on Foothsll Boulevard, a minimum of separation of 556 feet between intersections is required. The existing spacing t7 less thaw 460 feet. A computer simulation analysis of traffic Ilow on Foothill Boulevard (assuming a new signal were ro be installed at the present location of RHCCD) indicates that eastbound left-wrn treifie would continuously exceed capacity and back out of the left-turn pocket blocking the /5f iBuy~ TABIE 2 iRAN5YT 4f ANAlY51Y RESULTS lIDEET: fMlNI LL eWLEVAgO (GROVE AVENUE (0 $AN BERNARD IXO ROAOJ COxCi': cvs: gxC:O rel ocA Cfd td mi dvaY I»:vten Ofovf Aver'~a W San SftnuEirq, ud signaticed vi tx cuo~pmse si 9nal. AssOl,a s1A 1a01f qt f00t11i 11 ERYIRVaTd. N0, a/ AVG. TOtAL PERfORN SAi I!S OELAr STOPS (MOEY AM RcAK xglq Buie ovt (90'0 rode 2 6eL rc (199" ~rRt.) 4sfc OPT v/;T Et (90") Mode 2 06L CTC WST EB (700"7 OM ecAK MOgR eaf i~ oPT (99") Mode 2 OBL OTC (100^ <YC Ie) B+s'.c OPT v/3. Ea (90") M od< 2 OOL CxC +/]i ES (100") 0 20.03 3,2!7.0 57. L1 O 20.61 3,910.6 62.76 0 19.79 3,277.7 56.33 0 20.41 3,!97.7 62.30 1 37.K 6,295.7 139.33 2 70.34 6,535.6 227.07 0 27.15 5,790.4 96.63 1 29,92 6,137.0 119.32 15~- ~9 N-ti ~ eastbound inside thru-lane. The traffic model predicts 11 eastbound left-turn vehicles would need to be stored at RHCCD during each cycle. This demand represents approximately 242 feet oC storage required which compares well with ITE's general guideline which equates to 233 feet of left-[urn storage in chit case, - 1 The computerized signal simulation analysis Cor traffic Flow along Foothill Boulevard between Grows A~•e.^.ue and RHCCD presur..ed a 100 second cycle length. iE longer cycle length were necessary, on the order of 110 or 120 seconds, to satisfy future traffic increases along Foothill Boulevard then the inadequacy of eziuing left-turn storage for eaztbourd Foothill Boulevard oC RHCCD would be further exacerbated. As the cycle length increases so too does the left-[urn storage requirement. Consequently, rather than having [o stare 11 vehicles per cycle (Pot I00-second cycle length) the minimum stonge would be inereazed to I2 to Id vehicles per cycle. If such long cycle lengths were to become necessary then it is anticipated Iha[ during peak period the eaztbound left-turn queue at RHCCD could back up into and block Grove Avenue. The conclusion of this analysis is that insufficient separation currently exists on Foothill Bcu;evaM between Grove Avenue and RHCCD to permit signali:ation of RHCCD. If such were [o be done, the inside eastbound thru-lane would be continually blocked during the peak period by eastbound leC t-turn traffic wairinv rn nvn nvn awrrn r.~,., Fnn.r,m o,.~n..,..~ PROHIBITION OF LEFT-TL'RNC 4T R D Hltt O rNTRY rg DRIY The need for continued left-turn capability Crom Foothill Boulevard to RHCCD waz investigamd. Existing traffic counts show 78 VPH and 208 VPH turn onto northbound RHCCD from <-aztbound foothill Boulevard in the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. This by way of contrast only 7 and 12 VPH turn right onto RHCCD during the same periods. Examination of this fact combined with review of overall access ro the RHCCD residential area suggesu that eastbound left-turn access is used bath by residents az well u a commuter by-pass route. If thi<_ Iefr-turn is eliminated altogether then residena of the aeea who use chit access are going to be significantly inconvenienced as they have to towel all the way around the neighborhood to Carnelian Street and RHCCD/Camino Predera for access. These same residents will make a l,'-turn at the first opportunity (such as the San Bernardino Road signal) or will ust other residental sweets, such as Camino Predera, increasing tm(fic there and simply shifting the problem to another sweet. Furthermore, failure to provide for eastbound left-turns on Foothill Boulevard at RHCCD would not significantly effect the southbound commuter traffic. 153 ,„ To address the "commuter' issue on RHCCD, it appears that a better strategy to continue to allow eastbound left-turns at RHCCD and Foothill Boulevard, but to restrict the number that can enter by ins[alling a signal and timing that signal to act as a 'meter." This would have [he effect of irtc:eazing the travel time for [he commuters using the RHCCD by-pass causing some of them to continue east on Foothill Boulevard to Carnelian S[reet. Residents of the area would s[iII be able to enter via RHCCD perhaps encountering a li«le more delay than at present, but without having to drive all [he way around to the entrance on Carneian Stree[ or encounter a L'-turn situation at the Eirst available median opening on Foothill Boulevard. Although the recommendation is to provide Cull access at the new relocated RHCCD(Foothill Boulevard intersection an option exists to provide only a westbound left-turn into the Magic Lamp Restaurant parking lot. If this op[ioo were to be selected, presumably in an effort to reduce commuter use of RHCCD, then it is recommended that a westbound Iefc- turn lane should be constructed to provide access to the restaurant parking lot. However, signalization of the intersection would not be necessary nor, in Fact, even would it meet minimum signal warran[s. The volume of traffic exiting RHCCD turning left onto eastbound Foothtll Boulevard is less than IO VFH in the peak hour and such a volume does not jus[ify installation of a signal. Sl.'MM~RY ADD RECOMMENDATION Investigation of the feasibility of relocating the intersection of RHCCD/Foothill Boulevard indicates not only that such is possible, but highly desirable since it will not only improve the traffic flow conditions on Foothill Boulevard, but provide a small but significant deterrent to continued commuter traffic use of the RHCCD/Alts Cuesta Drive "short cu[" through the RHCCD residential area. OC six alternatives inves[igated, Alternative 4, realigning RHCCD through a vapnt lot 400 feet eazt of I-5 present intersection with Foothill Boulevard, clearly emerges az superior to the others in nearly every respect. Three of the alternatives involve limited sight durance which, unless vastly improved, would itself render these alternatives unfeasible. Even if this «striction could be solved, and though substantial regrading to the Red Hill would be possible, the remaining advantages of the recommended alternative far exceed those of the other candidates. Two of the alternatives (5 and 6) involve potential use of the Sycamore Inn's parking lot as a subni[ute by-pazs routing and a subsantial diversion of residents own travel patterns. As a result, it is recommended tha[ the City pursue a acpuisitton of a vacant parcel of land on the north side of Foothill Boulevard 400 feet esse of 15~{ IN RHCCD for the purpose of relocating/realigning RHCCD and signalization of a new intersec[ion located midway between two existing signals at Grove Avenue snd San Bernardino Road. It is further recommended [hat full IeCt-turn access be provided at the new RHCCD/FOO[hill Boulevard intersec[ion and that this Ioca[ion be signalized and timed to discourage commuter use while at the same time permitting mo[oriscs to enter albeit encountering somewhat more delay than is currently experienced. 155 ~z N-~y P. O. BOX 75. n673 AMETHYST ST. • aANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 17141 9a7-7535 March 22, 1989. , City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Paul Rougcau Senior Civil Engineer P. O. Boz 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dcar Paul: RECE~V ci ~QR2g198fD ~gN f~ ~ It was brought to my atten[ion that the City Council did not want to approve the consultants recommendation for the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive without the construction of a median, which would prcvcnt Icft hand toms from eas[ bound Foothill Boulevard onto Red Hill Country Club Ddve. This request is unuceptablc to the Fire Diatric[, due ro [he fac[ that we cumntly have automatic aid fire units responding from Upland m the Red Hill area that would be usable to turn left into that area. The emergcncy unit would have to then travel to Vineyard Aveaue, then north to Red Hill Country Club Drive end back to the site of the emergency. That is the long way around, especially if the destination ww the Country Club itself. It should be noted that not only would this proposed arrangement be a deterrent to fire apparatus, but also to police and ambulance vehicles needing quick acecss to tha[ area. If it would help, the fire district will offer its assistance to you regarding emergency egress as you pursue an alternate to the recommended acecss. Sincere Lloyd B, Almond Division Chiet/Fire Marshal LBA7ss Ise ADMINISTRATION Frank A. Costa, Jr. Ed.D. C¢ntral School District Distrlrt 3uperrnrendene Ingrid Vogel lsnrtant Supennrendenf. Bus~nets 3erv¢es 9457 Foothill Blvd. i Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ! (714) 989-8541 ,_ _r_~ ^.IT. :C :.. .,.ON .F April 11r 1989 ' City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 9340 Base Line Road, Unit B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 r•M are I1 } .on, F9 ! 4j ,~.~ Re: Environmental Asaessmeni and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 89-02 - City o£ Rancho Cucamonga Central school District staff have considered the City's proposed realignment of the north leg of Red Rill Country Club Drive by including a raised. curbed median on Fcothi 11 Boulevard in order to eliminate left turns into and out of Red Hill country C1uD Drive. This proposal presents the following concerns to Central School District -- Sn perticularr to our Transportation Department. 1. District hoses use the eastbound access into Red RL 11 Country Club Drive from Foothill Boulevard continually during the day. 2. Using the Vineyard Avenue access to Red Hill Country Club Drive would result in delays to our busing schedule and expeaure to increased traffic. 3. Drivers and children would be exposed to increased risk of injury due to the number of accidents that eecur nt the Vineyard Avenue intezaection. in spite of the traffic signal. Central School District respectfully requests that the City n_t eliminate the left turn access into Red 8111 Country Club Drive from Foothill Boulevard. Thank you for your conaidezatio . -c rw in N. .Inner Superintendent sp Nenrv L Slov Ansonia L Roden Poruernr c/w /~ a0AR0 Oi TR US1fFR Debbie drier vemen RECEIVED APR 111989 CIiT 0i AARCNO CUCAtla1GA FRCINEEgINC CIYISIOR Ruth A. Maxey Andrew Lylar .Memeer ++«aeer RESOLUTION N0. /~ 9-~(7 ,a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL 80ULEYARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02, REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NORTH LEG OF THE RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHIL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHONN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE REALIGNMENT OF REO HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 70 APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF THE PRESENT INTERSECTION NITH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BASED UPON AN IN-DEPTH ENGINEERING STUDY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: A. Recitals. (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Ptan Amendment is referred to as "the application". (11) On February 8, 1989, and on Apr11 12, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application. (111) On March 15, 1989, and on May 3, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings, concluded satA hearings on those dates; and heard and considered the Planning Commission recommendation of approval; and (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true an9 correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings, lnciuding written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: / 5~` LITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. FSP 89-02 PAGE 2 a) The existing skewed intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard. The preferred realignment as shown in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is not feasible. A feasible realignment has been deternilned by an in-depth traffic engineering study. The proposed plan is to realign Red H111 Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of its present intersection at Foothill 9oulevard. b) The property on the north side of Foothill Boulevard froe Red Hill Country Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned special commercial. The property on the south side of Foothill 8ouievard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned special commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned community caawercial. North and south of these commercial zones are residential areas. c) This amendment does not conflict with the Circulation Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development. within the district. in a manner rnnci dent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would not be materially in,iurtous or detrimental to the aQlacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragrapA 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendaent does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and ~s9 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. FSP 89-02 PAGE 3 c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially 1nJurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Council hereby finds that the pro,{ect has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the CaliFornta Envirommentat quality Act of 1970 and adopts a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cailfornta, on the 3rd day of May, 1989, hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02. ti. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law. / ~ 0 ~.t.z Access Control Program &u siness contiguous to Foothill Boulevard curr=_ntly realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel rnflcura;ions promote a multiple of ccr,- flic:i^.g access paints which disrupt traf- fic flaw 6y~ causing increased side fric- ticn. A recomme^.ded precram of access c_n:rcis/ cansis:en: wish current city access coHcies reculating a¢ess point, driveway c.as, ar.d their !ccation •rom cn another; "i r. chiding the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and right out islands) is_necessary due to the follcwing:' o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict / points. :;. a DELETE x.1.3 Red HiII Realicnment urrently, ed Hill Ins sects Foo• i~ B oulevar ~ at an awk rd angle. a t: this e ling confi- ration, Re' Hll lu will ce r igned in der to pro to an eff' gent and s e transitio. to Foothil. uleva4d. A prefer d aiicnmer was se!e~: [he followi the consi ' ration of c~ ,er olio ent scenar' s. The see ted ali ment is sh wn on this ace. . ~ ~-~ t ~ ~I ~ I Radhil aaliynma •~:_ l l ~ t l! "I E11 IRCUlATION CONC?FT N_y~ Exhibit A 7.I.z Aaess Control Prop ram ,us~n==_, comic uous to Fco Chill coulee and cu reerUy realize no access restric:ie rs. In a__.. _ existing fraa_rnen;ed parcel co^. `~~c a, o^.s cromoL° a multi glo os CJ^,- ,.. ^~~ -C_e5S paint$ which diS^UO; :-ai- ii^ 11 n'N C~~ ca JSirg it ~ea5ed sloe friC'~ _~,,, ~ __ ~~,,._ ,._ cram rof __s ,..,.., cis. onsi=_ =nt,a.; r. c.:rrent d'y= access ;.cilu es re-clz:ing acre=_s paint, cnve.vav cua, a..,. Cneir ioca;ion from .cn ~. ,a;ner; L._._cing^the ororsicn of rec:crocal access afireem=n;s, one sgeci al vehiC'J!2' 2Cee5 CCntrC5. (SLIC ~: as riche in, and rich:-e'.:; islands) is necessary cue to :he fol!awinc: o Incr==_sed vehicular [raffia cagac ty; o Incr=_zs=_d ;icn of safety; o Regucad v=_hir~lar traffic conflict ^ein;=_: and o Reducad vehicle/pederrian cgnflict pcin;s. ADD 7.1.3 Red HiII P,ealic nment Tne existing ekeved angle lnter- sectlon of Red R111 Country Blub Drove end Footh111 Boulevard Ss in close proximity to an existing tre- Sfic signal at Grove Avenue. The cambinetien of love cites SnCer- eection apeeing end ekeved align- ment creates operatlonel dlffleul- tlee vtin tzaftlc flor on Feothlll Boulevard. The preferred realignment ae shorn Sn the Fgothill Boulevard Specific PLan Se not feee161e. A feasible realignment has been de- termined by an in-depth traffic englneering study. The proposed plan le to »elign Red HS11 Country Club Drive to approximately 900 feet east of its present lntersee- elon at Fvothlll Boulevard, provide a meolsn Creak, and inelall • tro- pnaee traffic signal too lest turn errors 1. The recommended allgnunt le shorn on th1^ page. I ALT 4 '! t RECDMtdENDED ALIGNMENT i ..,._ I~ J ,.. ~~ :~,~ n .. -:~:~ ~~ ~~- CIRCU~STIrN r~r;~==- II-.. ~-~q F~r~~~~ 6 RESOLUTION N0. Xg-~(~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CPIIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT ANO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NORTH LEG OF THE RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB ORIYE ANO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHONN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY CONSTRUCTING A RAISED MEDIAN IN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETNEEN GROVE AVENUE AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD KITH RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE REMAINING AT ITS PRESENT LOCATION The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: A. Recitals. (t) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application". (Ti) On February 8, 1989, and on April 12, 1989, Lhe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed Dublic hearings on the application. (+itl On March 15, 100.0. anA nn May 4 1oAa rho r~~o r,..~q~~l ~f the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings, concluded said hearings on those dates; and heard and considered the Planning Commission recommendation of approval; and (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "R", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: I t~3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. FSP 89-02 PAGE 2 a) The commute traffic on Alta Cuesta and Red Hi11 Country Club Drive is a substantial disturbance to the Red Hill neighborhood. It is recommended that a raised median be constructed in Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino road to substantially reduce the commute traffic by eliminating left turns onto and from Red Hill Country Club Drive. b) The property on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red Hill Country Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned special commercial. The property on the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned special commercial and from San Bernardino Raad to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned community commercial. North and south of these commercial zones are residential areas. c) This amendment does not conflict with the Circulation Policies of Che General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would not be materially 1n,turious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and vrould not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during Lhe above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth 1n paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Fdethi ll BOUi evard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. FSP 89-02 flAGE 3 c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially in,{urious or detrimental to the ad,)acent properties. 4. This Council hereby finds that the protect has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and adopts a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the 3rd day of May, 1989, hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02. 6. BE IT FURTHER RESOLYEO that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law. 5 ~.7.z Access Control Program a usiness contiguous to Foothill 3ouleva rd c.:rr en;ly realize no access restrictions. I~ zddl„cn, existing fracmented parcel b ^~":=urz:ions promote a multiple of cor.- - rg access paints which disrupt :raf- - flo~.v ty causing increased side fric- ,.,~,. A recr.-.ended orcg ram of access c_^:refs,' ce r, sis;en: with current city access co:: c''. es reeu!a:ing access point, d-:veway ru;s, and their 'oe=_tion from en another; •induding the provision of recip rccai access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, and rich[-out islandsl is_necessary due to [he following :~ o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict paints; and o Reduced vehiclelpedestrian conflict J points. / DELETE 7.7.3 Red Hill Realignment ,eurrenay, ed Hill ir. setts Fco• i~ °culevar at an awk• rd ano;e. ue ' this e ~ ring confi ration, Re ~ I-'.ill will 6e r igned in der to Gro [e an e:`f' lent ands a transitio to Foothill ulevard. , A prefer d alignme. was s=_~lect the fcllowi the consi ' ration of o• ,er a!igr .ent scenar s. The se'• red aliafiment is shown on this ~aGe ~o• ~ ~~, ~ :~ ?7"II I ~ I ~ '~: I ~ I ~ Radl7il •alipnm• ~'• I I l i 7 1 I 'I ~ \: r V CIRCULATION CONC°=` i 7. N s3 Exhibit A ~.I.z Access Control Proc ram cus~r.=_=_s condo uous to Foothill Eoule•: and cu rrencv rea'.ne no access res tri c;;ors. :n zcc.;,c „ <_;asting freer„en[ed parcel o .;, .. c. eromote a mui[''~^ie cr c_.-,- __ --ae__ aolns which d;sruct t,~,- ~,... ccaine inr,reas ed s;de `-~-- jt c~" -. ___ cooed pro=ra-~~c` access aC____ _:a,_~c: rec ~-. :.^c 3c- - pout. C: I._n - .~. an,. ... _,~ cca:con trG.^.. cn __,,,:~_ i,~C.__, C the cF roves len of roc:G-cczl zc___s acresm?nts, and sceuai ven:c~_.u ~ c. s <o.^.:rcis, 15uc:^. as riGht- i~r, d. .. _..t 151an CSC IS nece~sa ry CUE .c ~.~_ i~~.cwlr.-. o ,. _rea=_EC vehicular traffic capad:y; o .-,-raasea perceo ticn cf safety: c Reauced venicular traffic con; IiC pc ana e ,=,educed ve!nicle/pede<trian conflict mina. 1 ~_ ALT 5 .. v~~:,;, o ~~o, ~~, II ~DJ 7.1.3 fled Hill Realignment the commute traf lle on alto Cues- [a and Red H111 Country Club Drove 1s a substantial disturbance to the Red Hill nelgnborhood. It is recommended that a rained median be constructed In Foothnll aou Levartl between Grave Avenue and son Bernard loo Road in order to substantial ly reduce the commute traffic by eliminat log left turns onto and from qed Hill Country Club Drove. The recommendetl alignment 1e ehovn on tole page, ~~ ~- i/~~-\ ~r ~ U \ ~'~ ~~ ~~ , n s t ., ,, ~,.~ rt~~; I ~ ~~._ _ ,-- CIRN LS710N CCUC°=' it-,._ ~~7 Exhibit B !1-S y RESOLUTION N0. g9_~o-] A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02, REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NORTH LEG OF THE REO HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, A5 SHONN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIYE TO APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF THE PRESENT INTERSECTION NITH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND CONSTRUCTING A RAISED MEDIAN [N FOOTHILL BOULEYARD BETNEEN GROVE AVENUE AND SRN DERNARDINO ROAD The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subfect Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment Ts referred to as "the application". (ti) On February 8, 1989, and on April 12, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application. (iii) On March 15, 1989, and May 3, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings, concluded said hearings on those dates: and heard and considered the Planning Commission recommendation of approval; and (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. TMs Gouncil hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2, Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: /~8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. FSP 89-02 PAGE 2 al The existing skewed intersection of Red Nill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard. The commute traffic on Alta Cuesta and Red Hill Country Ctub Drive is a substantial disturbance to the Red Hill neighborhood. The preferred realignment as shown in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Pian is not feasible. A feasTDle realignment has been determined by an in-depth traffic engineering study. The propose4 plan is to realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of its present intersection at Foothill Boulevard and to construct a raised median in Foothill Boulevard between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. b) The property on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red Hill Country Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned special commercial. The property on the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned special commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned community commercial. North and south of these commercial zones are residential areas. c) This amendment does not conflict with the Circulation Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, wfthln the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and ob,{ectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. 9ased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as Poilows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulatfon policies cf the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and ~~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. FSP 89-02 PAGE 3 b) The amen~ent promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan; and d) The amendaent would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental puality Act of 1970 and adopts a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the 3rd day of May, 1989, hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02. 6. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law. ~~ z I.z Access Control Program Business ccntiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addi;ien, existing fracmented parcel c~.^,f~cura;icns promote a multiple of con- f'Icang access paints which disrupt tref- _ .c'ycw by causing increased side frc- ,,,,•,. A recd..-.men ged prcgram of access ca n:rcls,' consistent with current city access pciicies regulating access point, c..^ivewaY cuts, and their location from on another; including the provision of reciorocai access agreements, and spe:.ial vehicular access cgntrols, (such as right- ir., and rich[-out islandsl is_necessary due [o t..^.e following :~ g Increased vehicular traffic caoaeity; g Increased perception of safely; g R_duc_d vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehiclelpedestrian conflict points. DELETE 7.1.3 Red HiII Realignment Eoulevar' at an awk rd angle. ue '% this a ring ccnfi ration, Re' Hill will k:e r gned in der to pro to an eff' lent and s e tran sitio to Foothill ulevard. A prefer d alignmer was select the fellowi the consi ' ration of o er aligr• ent scenar' s. The se' .:ed all meat is s wn on this age. , 0 ® O ac_.c _~~ K --~~ ~ R~dhil a~lignma ''~ clRCUUnoN co•vc_pr -r.a ~ 7~ Exhibit A H.Sa 7.1.z Access Control Program o us!n ass ccn;iCUOUS to Foothill boulevard curr_^,Ly realize no access restric;ie ns. In adc ;ion, existing fracmented parcel cor(:c urancrs prbmCte a multiple of con- flicarn access pcinls which disrupt traf- flc flcn ~v ca,,; mg increased side frk- .:on. - __.,. ~. _,..,_~ orcc ram~of access COntrOS. Can. S~Sten LOwilh CJ Renf Clty a~bocc ~nlip oc r___la;n rj a oeg pb' _. d r,veway cu•s, and t'r. sir Iota;Icn from on another, Indudin? the provision ~of rec:protal access aare_m ants, and special vehi c~lar act=_ss co r.!rols, Isuch as richt- in, ant richr cut islands) is necessary due to the feilawir.c: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased per ceotion of safety; o Reduced ve nicular traffic conflict p tin s; and o Reduced vehid e/pedestrian conflict pcins. ADD 7.1.3 Red HI~I 2ealignment The existing akeved angle inter- ' eectlCn of Retl HS11 Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevsrd ie Sn clogs proximity to en ex Seting tra- Stlc signal et Grove Avenue. The eombi na tl on of this close Sntereee- tlon spacing end akeved alignment creelee operational dif fieultiee vi[n tratSiC Slor on Foothill eou- leverd. The commute traffic on Alts Cueet• antl fled Mill Country Club Drive Se a eubatantial dle- turbanc• !o th• Red H111 Xelghbor- hocd. The preSerred rwllgnmen! es shorn in the Foothill Boulevard Speelfle Plan 1• not feuible. A teeelble reallgnment ha• been de- terminetl Dy •n 1n-depth tr•if lc englneeri n9 study. The proposed plan Se to realign Red N111 Country Club Dr1 v to epprozlmately 900 feet uat of its preunt Sntereee- tlgn •t Foothill Boulevard and to construct • raised median in Feot- nill Boulevard DeLvfen Grove Avenue end San Bernardino Roed. ins reco- mmentletl •llgnaent Se •hovn on this page. 4 ` _ i ~~ I , ALT 6 _-__ -J _~_~ . mil- ~.~ _ ~ .. .. _.. ~ / 1 X111 ~ ~\'y .~ i, , i ~, '~ \\ :i ' ----~_ - clacu~>ner, co,~ce=- ?~- Exhibit 6 rl `~ I - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 15, 1989 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer !-` SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSNENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC - reques o c ange propose oca on o e nor leg of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard intersection, as shown in the Specific Plan, by the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of the present intersection with Foothill boulevard. RECOMEiWATION: Staff recommends public hearing discussion of the proposed Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amen6nent. if the City Council agrees with the staff Analysis and Facts for Findfng, the Council should adopt the amendment to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. ABSTRACT: The existing skewed angle Intersection of Red Hill Counctry Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed aligmnent creates operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard. An "intersection Relocation Feasibility Study" was prepared for the City by Austin-Foust Assoc., Traffic Consultants, to analyze the existing intersection and recommend alternatives, The recommended plan proposes to relocate the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive approximately 400 feet east of its present location, provide a median break in the Foothill Boulevard median island, and install a two phase traffic signal (no left turn arrowsl. The City Planning Commission on February 8, 1989, adopted Resolution 89-28 recommending approval of this amendment. During the City Planning Commission discussion, the Commission recommended that a multi-phase traffic signal allowing left turns from Foothill Boulevard on green arrow should be installed. CCSR FSP 99-02 MARCH 15, 1999 PAGE 2 LOCATION The study area included the existing intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive with Foothill Boulevard and alternate locations at the Sycamore Inn/San Bernardino Road and Baker Avenue. Exhibit "A" shows the study area. The north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red Hill Country Club Drive east Lo Lhe Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned Special Commercial. The south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned Special Commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the railroad crossing is zoned Community Commercial. Areas north and south of these commercial zones are zoned Residential. A San Antonio Community Hospital project is proposed in an office zone at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. BACKGROUND: Red Hill Country Club Drive presently connects to Foothill Boulevard in a skewed angle intersection in close proximity to the signalized intersection at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed angle creates operational problems with traffic flow un Fouihi ii cuuievard and makes infeasible any Type of ira~iic can irui other than the existing two-way stop. Red Hill Country Club Drive and Alta Cuesta Drive also form a continuous link between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Road. The existence of this connection creates a by-pass routing for commuter traffic to avoid longer trips involving either Carnelian Street on the east or Campus Avenue or, the west. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Ptan (FSP) recognized these problems and recommended an alignment of °ed H111 Country Club Drive that intersects Grove Avenue, as shown on Exn~bit "B". The City Council at its meeting of September 21, 1988, directed staff to process an amendment to the FSP to revise the reallgnnw:nt of Red Hill Country Club Drive. The City hl red the traffic engineering firm of Austin-Foust Assoc. to prepare an in-depth traffic engineering study of the problem. The final report, "Intersection Relocation Feasibii7ty Study," 7s attached. ANALYSIS: The existing intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive is deficient for reasons stated in Section III above. An in-depth analysis was proposed that studied the realignment of Red H111 Country Club Drive at various locations, shown on Exhibit "C". Alternatives 1, 2 I ~~ CCSR FSp 89-02 MARCH 15, 1989 PAGE 3 and 3 (Baker Avenue and Sycamore Inn east and west) all have a substantial sight distance deficiency to overcome. These three alternatives would connect to Red Hill Country Club Drive by expanding a private road which now gives direct access to the Sycamore Inn parking lot. However, adequate sight distance for the intersection cannot be provided without substantial hillside grading or realignment of the Red HT11 Country Club curve. If this problem could be solved, the resulting alignments would be as shown on Exhibit "D". However, the best possible design speed that can be obtained is 25 MPH. This is not realistic due to the grade of Red Hill. A reasonable realistic minimum design speed would be 35 MPH. To obtain 35 MPH design speed would require regrading most of the hillside. Presuming that the problems of sight distance and minimum design speed can be overcome, analysis was conducted of the effects of those three alternatives. RLTERNATIVE 1 - Extending Baker Avenue north of Foothill ou evE-T ar~- The most significant advantage for this alternative is that by-pass traffic coming from the west could be encouraged to proceed on to Carnelian Street rather than use Red Hill Country Club Drive since it would involve some backtracking, albeit a minor amount. This "advantage" is offset by the following three significant disadvantages: 1. The existing railroad undercrossing limits the width of Foothill Boulevard to four narrow travel lanes. The existing bridge makes the installation of an eastbound left-turn on Foothill Boulevard at Baker difficult since the roadway is limited to four travel lanes through the undercrossing. Providing the eastbound left-turn lane for a sufficient distance to accommodate Lhe left-turns could reduce the travel lane widths to an unsatisfactory condition. It 1s recognized that this condition would not exist in the future after Foothill Boulevard has been widened to its ultimate width. However, although tentative bridge widening studies are underway, no firm date is set for construction. Therefore, the relocation of Red Hill Country Club Drive would be contingent upon completion of the railroad bridge widening. 2. Relocating the Red Hill Country Club Drive intersection east of the railroad undercrossing increases the traffic volume on Foothill Doulevard in this critical narrow four-lane section by about 4,000 ADT. This would have signlflcart although short term negative impact on traffic flow Tn this area. I I CCSR FSP 89-02 MARCH 15, 1989 PAGE 4 3. The cost of constructing Red Hill Country Club Drive under the railroad would be quite costly, much more so than any other alternative. RLTERNATIVE 2 AND 3 -Red Hill Country Club Drive located west or eas o e ycamore Inn: The primary advantage would be that the new Red Hill Country Club/Foothill Boulevard intersection would become simply an expansion of an existing four-way intersection and the present skewed intersection would be eliminated. A new signalized intersection is not created. Another advantage is that unlike the Baker Street alternative, (Alternative 1) Foothill Boulevard could be restriped to six lanes permitting the additional 4,000 ADT from Red Hill Country Club Drive to be accommodated immediately. This advantage Ts counter-balanced by the following disadvantages: 1. The existing Sycamore [nn parking lot would be separated from the building by a new roadway. This in effect creates an off- site parking lot with its associated pedestrian safety concerns as patrons would have to cross a roadway with over 4,000 daily trios. 2. The minimum design speed of 35 MPH cannot be obtained. The "best" design speed achievable is 25 L1P{rhich should not be acceptable. 3. Even a minimum rcadway width (36 feet) creates serious disruptions of the exis*.ing parking lot. 4. The right-of-way necessary for these alternatives is substantial, ALTERNRTIVE 4 - Realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to a location approx ma e y 400-fee e--E asf oT s-11; presen oca on: This alternative has became the Recommended Plan and is shown in Exhibits "E" and "F". This alternative offers the following advantages: 1. An acceptable design speed with adequate intersection sight distance can be achieved. 2. A computerized simulation of the traffic operation of the resulting signal system indicates the proposed intersection spacing will facilitate the movenw;nt of thrauyh traffic an Foothill Boulevard without backing traffic into adJacent intersections and a goad coordinated signal progression can be achieved. I ~~ CCSR FSP 89-02 MARCH 15, 1989 PAGE 5 An analysis of the impact on existing peak hour traffic flaw conditions was conducted by using a computer traffic flow simulation program, TRANSYT-7F. The existing signals on Foothill Boulevard at Grove Avenue and at San Bernardino Road and new two-phase signal (i.e., no separate left-turn arrows onto Red Hill Country Club Orive) was analyzed at the recommended Alternative 4 location. The results indicate that in order to provide a satisfactory level of service in the PM peak hour, three (3) eastbound travel lanes on Foothill are necessary. In addition, unless a separate left-turn phase is provided for eastbound Foothill Boulevard to northbound Red Hill Country Club Road, the extsting peak hour demand of 208 left turns per hour wilt be limited to a maximum of about 160. This will effectively function as a "ureter" restricting the number of commuters using Red Hill Country Club Drive as a by-pass routing between Foothill Boulevard and Base Line Avenue during the PM peak hour. When a four-lane cross section on Foothill Boulevard is analyzed, the PM peak hour is 114 percent of capacity an unacceptable condition. To mitigate this condition, either the signal at Red Hill Country Club Drive must be eliminated, or a third eastbound "thru" lane must be provided, It would be recommended that rootm ii uouievara oe restrtped to provide six (6) travel lanes 1n the segment between Grove Avenue and San Bernardino Road. Although the relocation would permit signalization of the new Red H711 Country Club Drive at Foothill Boulevard, the existing intersection could be retained as a two-way stop. The proposed new signal at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard could act as a "meter" for limiting traffic onto northbound Red Hf11 Country Club Drive, while this would not prevent commuter use, it would severely limit such use and act as a deterrent to continued future increases (analyzed with item 2). The right-of-way acquisition required is minimal compared to other alternatives. Additional Analysis of Existing Location: The effect of signalizing the extsting location was also analyzed by the computer traffic flaw simulation program. The analysts shows that there is insufficient space to store left-turning vehicles at I ~~ CCSR FSP 89-02 MARCH 15, 1989 PAGE 6 Red Hill Country Club Drive and Grove Avenue. To accommodate adequate left-turn storage, Grove Avenue and Red Hill Country Club Drive must be separated by a minimum of 556 feet. The existing spacing is less than 460 feet. These figures are based on a traffic signal cycle length of 100 seconds. It is very likely that future traffic growth will require a longer cycle and the pocket length would then need to be longer. If the left turn pockets are not long enough, cars waiting for a left turn will have to wait in the thru traffic lane, a potentially hazardous condikion. Neither a traffic signal, nor a median break, should be installed at the existing location of Red HT11 Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard. Summary of Proposed Realignment: Investigation of the feasibility of relocating the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive/Foothill Boulevard indicates not only that such is possible, but desirable since it will not only improve the traffic flow conditions on Foothill Boulevard, but provide a small deterrent to continued commuter traffic use of the Red Hill Country Club Drive/Alto Cuesta Drive "short cut" through the Red Hill Country Club Drive residenkial area. Of four alternatives investigated, Alternative 4, realigning Red Hill Country Club Drive through a vacant lot approximately 400 feet east of the present intersection with Foothill Boulevard, clearly emerges as superior to the other three. The other alternatives involve limited sight distance which, unless vastly improves, wouia 7LSBIT renaer these alternatives infeasible. Even if this restriction could be solved, and though substantial regrading to the Red Hill would be possible, the remaining advantages of the recommended Alternative 4 exceed those of Alternatives 1, 2 or 3. It is recommended that full left-turn access be provided at the proposed Red Hill Country Club Drive/Foothill Boulevard intersection and that this location be signalized without left-turn arrows and timed to discourage commuter use while at the same time permitting motorists to enter, encountering somewhat more delay than is currently experienced. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: to con,iunction with the appilcation, an Initial Study/Preliminary Environmental Assessment, in conformity with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared and the proposal would have no significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the Planning Commission may make a finding of no significant impact on the environnent and recommend certification of a Negative Declaration. 17~ CCSR FSP 89-02 MARCH 15, 1989 PAGE 1 FACTS FOR FINDINGS: a) The amendment does not conflict with the circulation policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goats of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. Respectfully submitted, ~~~1~,, a ~ , ~w~~ti RHM:PAR:sd Attachments: Planning Commission Minutes of the action far the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 89-02 Planning Commission Resolution No. 89-28 ExMbit "A" - Yicinlty Map Exhibit "B" -Red Hill Country Club Drive realignment presently as shown in FSP Exhibit "C" -Alternatives 1, 2, 3 and 4 Enbiuil "G" - niiyia"enl $luuiea ivr Aiiernaliven i, ~ onu 3 Exhibit "E" -Alternative 4 Exhibit "F" -Recommended plan shown on parcel map Foothill Fire District Review Letter In-depth Engineering Study 179 RESOLUTION NO.iar~-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02, REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE NORTH LEG OF THE RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB ORI VE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHONN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUO CRIVE TO APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET EAST OF THE PRESENT INTERSECTION KITH FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BASED UPON AN IN-DEPTH ENGINEERING STUDY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific P1 an Amendment No. 89-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application". (ti) On February 8, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (i 11 ) Un the 15th of March, 1989, the City Counci 1 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing, concluded said hearing on that date; and heard and considered the Planning Commission recommendation of approval; and (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth to the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resclution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: /80 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. FSP 89-02 PAGE 2 a) The existing skewed intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard. The preferred realignment as shown in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is not feasible. A feasible realignment has been determined by an in-depth traffic engineering study. The proposed plan is to realign Red Hill Country Club Orive to approximately 400 feet east of its present intersection at Foothill Boulevard. b) The property on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red Hill Country Club Drive east to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned special commercial. The property on the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned special commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned community commercial. North and south of these conmercial zones are residential areas. c) This antendnrent does not conflict with the Circulation Policies of the General Plan and will provide for deveiopnrenc, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding propert/es. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and l Qr CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ND. FSP 89-02 PAGE 3 c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and adopts a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on the 15th day of March, 1989, hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02. 6. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law. 18~- ~.,.i Access Control Proo am Huss r~ess contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realise no access restrictions, In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. q recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location frem on another; including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls; (such as right- in, and right-out islands) is_necessary due to the .following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. p _ ;,, , ~--- _ °~~ ` - ~., - _ ,., DELETE 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment urrently, ed Hill in sects Foo ii Boulevar at an awk rd angle. ue tc this a Ling cpnfi ration, Re Hill will be r signed in der to pro to an eff' lent and s e transi do to Foo[hill~ ulevard. A prefer d alignme was select the follows the consi ration of o er alig ent scenar' s. The set ted aIi ment is sh wn on this age. ---- I I e I daQ; ,~ ~_.. ~. Q~ ~~, , ,- `~b I~I~ u -~ I fl~dhil ealipnme - 1l i 1 1 I 'i ~ ~'a 1 "~ CIRCULATION CONCcPT -7,8 F"h~ ~t ADD 7.1.2 Access Control Program Business con:ieuous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addltio n, existing fragmented parcel co nfic ura (ions promote a multiple of con- flir.ing access points which disrupt traf- fic fiow by causing in rreased side fric- tion. A recommended pros ram _of access controls, co nsis:e nt with current city access polid es regulating access poi r,L driveway cues, and their location from .on another; fncluding the provis ion 'of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as righ[- in, and right-cut isia ndsl is necessary due to the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased percepticn of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian eanflict points. 7.1.3 Red Hill Realinnment The existing skewed angle intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard. An in-depth traffic engineering study has studied the existing intersection an6 four alternatives and reconrnends one that is feasible and desirable. The recommended plan is to relocate the intersection of Red Ni11 Country Club Orive approximately 400 feet east of its present location, provide a median break, and install a two-phase traffic signal (no left turn arrows). The recommended alignment is shown an this page. T } RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT .M,K. ^^ ~_~`~~~~`~~ U ,,. CIRCULATION CONCE?T -i .3 Exhibit B rc nynw coerrg mw r~ rron~ wg; rneeman LraCL dna wou lG--~gQTR" a al grading. Chairman el stated the width of the ;mailer lot would be 103 feet, and would 6e co able to other lots 1n the area. Commissioner To felt that whoever bought the lot would have to des the layout in order ercome the site difficulties, and those dif ties would be addressed a t Lime. Mr. Coleman statrd that u Planning Commission Admini;trati gulations, a tie vote means no actton, ich constitutes a denial, w o Resolution either approving or denying t o,iect. Therefore tf t m was appealed to City Council, the minutes wou nstitute the record Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconde Mc Niel dopt the Resolutions approving Environmental Assessment a enta Parcel Map 11780 and Environmental Assessment and Variance 88- ton did not carry by the following vote: AYES: CpMISSIONERS: MCNI0., NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BL ,CHI TI EA ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E ABSTAIN: COMMISS EMERICK ..... 8:40 P Planning Commission Recessed • • ~ * x I. ENVIROMNENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL 80ULEVAPD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - - reques o c ange a propose aca on o e can ry C1uD Drive a M Foothill Boulevard intersection, as shown in the Specific Plan, by the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 40G feet east of the present intersection with Foothill Boulevard, based upon an in-depth engineering stuff. Paul Rougeau, Senior C1v11 Engineer, presented the staff report. He suggested rewarding Condition 5 to indicate that the Pianning Commission recomnerded approval. Commissioner Tolstoy asked to see the drawing of haw the cut-de-sac. would be placed. I~~ Planning Commission Minutes -9- February 8, 1989 Comeissloner Chltiea asked how the Magic Lamp driveway would be Impacted. Mr. Raugeau' stated the Magic Lamp should widen their driveway far better access. Commis stoner Emerick asked how many vehicles would be able to make a left turn from Foothill going north on Red Hill Country Club Orive during peak traffic, Chairman Mc Niel opened the public hearing. Joe Foust, principal of Austin-Foust Associates, Inc., the firm which prepared the feasibility study, stated the current count is 208 vehicles per hour making left turns during afternoon peak hours. It was felt that this included both residents and through traffic. They estimated that with no left turn arrow 2 - 4 vehicles would be able to make the turn per cycle, equating to 160 left turns per hour. Commissioner Emerick asked if the number of vehicles making the left turn would be decreased as westbound traffic on Foothill increased. Mr. Foust indicated the number of vehicles making a left turn would then drop to 1 - 2 per cycle, thereby decreasing the hourly number. Commissioner Emerfck asked if that would be enough to serve the residents of Red Hill. Mr. Foust stated they felt that would be sufficient far resident traffic. Commissioner Blakesley asked why a short-duration left turn arrow was not veiny ,e~minle iwieu. Mr. Foust indicated their experience has been that if left turn arrows are unduly short, many drivers merely contlrnre to turn after Lhey receive a red light. Mr. Rougeau indicated that with a left turn arrow, some people speed up to try to make the arrow. Mr. Foust suggested an all-red interval at the end of the yellow light, with no left wrn arrow. Chairman McN1a1 felt there would be more accidents with no left turn arrow, Mr. Foust }alt that an all red signal would provide the cushion to prevent accidents. He felt that if a left turn arrow was installed, 1t would add to the through traffic using Red H111. Commissioner Blakesley preferred a left turn arrow. Betty An tan, 7611 Buena Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, stated her two main concerns were traffic control on Red Hill and the ability m turn left onto Foothill from Red Hill Country Club Drive. She wanted eastbound traffic routed to the /8~ Planning Comeisslon Minutes -10- February 8, 1989 :;~ Sycamore Inn, where 1t would make a U-turn. She felt only residents would be willing to make p U-turn at the Sycamore-, as it would be shorter for through traffic to continue an to Vineyard in order to go north. Tom Francis, 2241 M1cheltorea, Los Angeles, stated he owned property across from the Sycamore Inn. Ne asked if the traffic flow study had considered traffic all the way to Baker. Chairman Mc Niel state4 that it had. Michael List, 7731 Alta Cuesta, Rancho Cucamonga, stated safety on Foothill Boulevard and the amount of traffic on Alta Cues to should be considered. He did not feel any of the proposals addressed the Alta Cuesta traffic. He asked for the elimination of the curve on Red Hill Country Club Drive. He suggested going further east on Foothill and making a road opposite the trailer park entrance on Foothill. Chairman Mc Niel felt that would create a greater problem for Baker Street. Mr. list suggested another option would be to construct the road north of Baker, entering the new tract on the front of the hill, aM going north from there to Red Htil Country Club Drive. , Barrye Hanson, Senior Ltvil Engineer, felt that the 2-1 slopes in the area would make it very difficult to construct a street. Mr. list was concerned about the cars stacking m make a left turn in order to go north on Red H111 Country Club Drive. lTu ii ii riici >te tcu d ~uEU ld ll Ia IYIN wUUIJ ue 1Y11~Li Yl 1.CY IA1 separa LC Lfle traffic from westbound traffic. Ben Mackall, 9956 Hemlock Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he represented Ray Cramer Mack all the owner of the parcels involved in the proposed realignment. He stated they were concerned and felt their remaining lot would become undevelopable, and they therefore wanted adequate conpensation from the City. Elizabeth Gaivez, 8166 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she was the owner of the service station at Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard. She felt raligmaent was a waste of taxpayer money and that the alignment should remain as is. She felt that prohibiting left Wrns onto Foothill Boulevard from Red Hi 11 Country Club Drive would calve any current problems. She expressed concern that with the realtgnment, traffic would merely cut through the service station. Joshua Marren, 7893 Alta Cuesta, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he had lived on Alta Cuesta for the pass eighteen years. He was concerned about the increase 1n traffic using Alta Cuesta. He felt eastbound traffic on Foothill should not be able to make a left hand turn onto Red Hill Country Club Drive. He stated that morning traffle going south on A to Cuesta was Just as tad as evening traffic. /87 planning Camatsston Minutes -11- February 8, 1989 Chairman McH1ei stated the traffic in the morning going south would be the same as the traffic in the evening going north, Fie said he was instrumental in getting the stop Sign Installed at Valle Wsta some years earlier, and he felt that had helped to slow traffic. He said the Sheriffs were also active in the area. Mr. Marren felt the speed enforcement by the Sheriffs was very sporadic because the City did not have the money to provide far continual enforcement. Dale Frisby, 7904 Voile Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, comnerxfed the traffic engineers and agreed that Alternative 4 was the hest solution. Fbwever, he did prefer a green left turn arrow of short duration, because he felt without one traffic would back up too far. Bob Brown, 7624 Alta Cuesta, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he thought 2,200 cars per day currently use Red Hill. He felt not that muh over-the-hill traffic would be eliminated. He also thought the Sheriffs should ticket more people. Pat Lewis, 8335 Camino Sur, Rancho Cucamonga, liked the engineering s Wdy. Fie felt Alternative 4 was good and felt a left turn arrow could be installed later if necessary. Emanuel Stolman, 8433 Valle Vista P1 ace, Rancho Cucamonga, felt 1t was a fair solution. He wanted to know how soon the Ctty would start carxlemning the property and how soon the construction would take place. Russ Maguire, City Engineer, stated it was preliminarily scheduled to begin this fiscal year through the Cal-Trans process. However, because of the lawsuits, the schedule was pushed back approximately ten months. He felt the nnnnnain vnulA ha e,a.feA fh nnnnw ral _Tnane Tn luw vf~h An~I n. ..n..L hn..f nnf n. ~..y. _... .. __._ __ .__. .__ _....-~,. __. .. _..- ... --.._ ....,. ~.. ...~.. ..~~.....~.~ in December, and acquisitions and right-of-wAy negotiations beginning the following June. Mr. Stolman asked how the City would deal with property owners to obtain title to the property. Ralph Hanson, Deputy Ctty Attorney, stated the Ctty would try to negotiate with the owners, but if necessary they could condemn the property and pay fair market value. Mr. Stolman asked how soon the L1ty would be dealing with the property owners. Chairman MtM1a1 stated it would be necessary W deal with the appropriate agencies prior to consaenting negotiations. This meant that the City would require approval of Southern Pactflc for the railroad bridge and Cal-Trens. Therefore, the process could take a long time. Don Bollinger, stated he represented San Mtonlo Hospital, and they appreciated the City's willingness to reconsider the originally proposed realignment through their property. He felt Alternative 4 made Defter traffic and economic sense. He stated they now could go forward with the planning and development of their property. / ~~ Planning Commission Minutes -12- February 8, 1989 Gordon Zwisler, 7879 Sierra Vista, Rancho Cucamonga, felt the alternative made the most sense. He indicated that Red H111 Country C1uD quite often has dinner parties or meetings which meant that many cars sometimes would need to make a left within a short period of time. Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Blakesley felt from a symmetry point of view Alternative 2 looked the best, but he felt it was unacceptable to impact the Sycamore Inn. He felt Alternative 4 was a good compromise. Commissioner Chitiea was also not willing to tamper with the Sycamore Inn or its trees. She felt Tt was not appropriate to put a street through the middle of a parking lot. She thought Alternative 1 was too costly and would impact future development too much. She favored Alternative 4, but felt installing a left turn lane without a signal would be a safety hazard, She supported the proposal with a left turn arrow of reasonable, not minimal, length. Commissioner Tolstoy felt Alternative 4 was the best solution to a weighty problem and he agreed with Commissioner Chitiea regarding the green arrow. Commissioner Emerick supported Alternative 4, but was not sure regarding the left turn arrow. He felt the traffic engineers were more knowledgeable in the area, but he was afraid the engineers may have been placing too much emphasis on cutting down through traffic. Chairman Mc Niel stated he liked the original concept of cutting through to Grove because it would reduce the traffic an Foothill Boulevard. Of the current proposals he favored Alternative 1 because he felt it would better co rv iro naYnr' ar,A peA Yill ~ .gyn...,, ri ~,. ~r ~..- ,L,..• Lc . -'J ~, 4L fGIL LIIC LViL wO~ V.IV high. He felt the alternatives cutting through the Sycamore Inn were not acceptable, Therefore, the only viable alternative was 4. He did not like the idea of a non-signalized left turn lane, even if it meant more through traffic. Commissioner Chitiea stated she felt that safety had to be a higher concern than the amount of through traffic. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the Resolution recomnendtng approval of Environmental Assessment and Foothill Boulevard Specific PLn Amendment 89-02, with modifications to stale the Planning Commission wss recoamrending approval. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITiEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSfOY LADES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CCMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried • • + x + /S~ Planning Commission Minutes -13- February 8, 1989 RESOLUTION N0. 89-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHC CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02, REQUESTING TO CHANGE THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BDULEVARD INTERSECTION, AS SHOWN IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN, BY THE REALIGNMENT OF REO HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE TO APPROXIMATELY COD FEET EAST OF THE PRESENT iNTE RSECTiON WITH FOOTHi LL BOULEVARD, BASED UPON AN IN-DEPTH ENGINEERING STUDY. A, Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application". (ii) On February 8, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. N;tu TNG AF M pF if is ho •o by fm and dcfonm: noA and ~,.1 .~nA A.. •hn Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set for±h in the Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 8, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Com~~i ssion hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The existing skewed intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close in toriection spacing and skeweJ aiiynment creates operational difficulties with traffic flow an Foothill Boulevard. The preferred realignment as shown in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is not feasible. A feasible realignment has been determined by an in-depth traffic engineering study. The proposed plan is to realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of its present intersection at Foothill Boulevard. / / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-28 FSP 89-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEBRUARY 8, 1989 PAGE 2 6) The property on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Red Hill Country Club Orive east to the Southern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned special commercial. The property on the south side of Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road is zoned special commercial and from San Bernardino Road to the Scuthern Pacific railroad crossing is zoned community commercial. North and south of these commercial zones are residential areas. c) This amendment does net conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Gene~•al Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and witn related development; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dur•i ny Lice auuve-referenced pubi is heariny anti upon cite specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Commission recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. I ~1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 89-28 FSP 89-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhUNGA FEBRUARY 8, 1989 PAGE 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs . 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of the Foothill Soul eva rd Specific Plan Amendment No. 89-02 on the 8th day of February, 1989. 5. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1989. PLANNING COQ-M~-MISSION OF TH1E CITY OF1~RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, uo hereby certify that the foreaoina Resolution was Auly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the Bth day of February, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMNIISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ~ 9~- ~.1,z Access Control Progr m Business contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing increased side fric- tion. A recommended program cf access controls,r con sisieni with current city access policies regulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location frem on another; -including the provision of reciprocal ,access agreements, and special vehicular access controls; (such as ~right- in, and right-out islands) is necessary due to the .following; - o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehiclelpedestrian conflict points. DELETE 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment urrently, ed Hill in sects Foo ii Boulevar at an awk rd angle. ue t; this a Ling confi ration, Re~~ Hill will be r igned in der to pro to an eff' lent ands a tran sitio [o Foothill ~ A prefer d s fallowi the alig ent scei all ment is s ~r}t' was sel ration of The set~ on this,rfa~ jef the er -, - ,~_,. ~, a~~ ~o~~ ~ ~~ ~~: ~ ~ ~~ -rl~- I Fedhil eali9nl I l i 1 1 I 'I ~. CIRCULATION CONCEPT ~,•h. 't ADD ~.t.z Access Control Program Business co r, tig uous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel co nfiourations promote a multiple of con- flicting access points which disrupt traf- fic flow by causing inr.reased side fric- tion. A recommended program ~of access controls, consistent with current city access policies re-gulating access point, driveway cuts, and their location from on another; Including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right- in, anti right-out islands) is necessary due .to, the following: o Increased vehicular traffic capacity; o Increased perception of safety; o Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and o Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. ~j~ ~~ RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT °o„„ ~ ~^ ... ~..~..,. aw.. ~ 0O ~~ ~ I ~ ~ </~ II ~ -- ~; .~ . 7.1.3 Red Hill Realignment The existing skewed intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection soacina and skewed alignme,^.*_ cry-rtes operational difficulties with traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard, An in-depth traffic engineering study has studied the existing intersection and four alternatives and recommends one that is feasible and desirable. The recommended plan is to relocate the intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive approximately 400 feet east of its present location, provide a median break, and install a two-phase traffic signal (no left turn arrows). The recommended alignment is shown on this page. ,,~ CIRCULATION CONCEPT Exhibit B il'9Q~~;p~Illlil 7~~Il~ ry~7 P. O. a0% 35 • 6673 AMETHYST 5T, .RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 (7141 9a7-2595 March 6, 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTN: Paul Rougtau, Traffic Engineer P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Paul: I have reviewed your slat( report for the proposed amendment to the Foothill Boultvard Specific Plan 89-02 City of Rancho Cucamonga. I would agree with the proposed plan to realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of its present intersection at Foothill Boulevard and signalizing that intersection. This plan is desired, provided that a portion of the current Red Hill Country Club Drive running basically north-east from Foothill Boulevard, be maintained in a length not to exceed one hundred and fifty Ceet, in order that the firt district might maintain a tactical approach to and around the existing businesses and residences currently within the proposed triangular piece of land. Thank you for the opportunity to address this important issue. Sincerely, ~~~ Lloyd B. Almond Division Chief/Firt Marshal LBA/ss 1 ]8 ._ _~ ._ by r~ O ~' cd U J U 1 U c~ w w O 7. .~ C.) ++ .~ r W 7 ~P Exhibit ~ T.,.3 Red Nill Realignment Currently, Red Nifl intersects Foothill Boulevard at an awkward angle. Due to this existing configuration, Red Hill will be realigned in order to promote an efficient and safe transition to Foothill Boulevard. A preferred alignment was selected the following the consideration of other alignment scenarios. The selec!ed alignment is shown on this page. L 1 ~ 1\~Q~ t1 R~dhill Renllpnmont ~ :, 7 j wCW"' a -~~ 4 i `~Czw ~ G ~1 -Nn1 7 l l.o i~ : ' . Y . rn ` n\ js ~ Q 'J C I J ~ e J = C\ ,~ •'. t -- - - - h -- - - - ,Y r~, ~ r ` ~ C) • a~ p , 6 ; Q . ' .: ~ ... d ~ ...... 1 ~ J d .• ..: • ~ J ~ \ ryr~ m ~ ~ Q ~Y\~ 00147 1 ~ ~Oif~ \ f!.~..._ I~ x!•67\ O '"~ o ,,, o L ~~(/'~/ ~ o ~ ~ ~ l 'y 'r T - 1 r~ ~ lJ 2 W,_ J J ~ w U nV ua v~ o ~ u'' ~z~" J i wKl;.'i w U '1b uau~ . -r.n. L w S { m G A _ - a m ~ -nn< ? G ~~ ~ 3jis~ ~1 "~ te 'T c ~ •t s I ~ .r 7,„ ~ 37t .' Q • U ~ ~ ~ ~ X >~~ I~ ~ ~ N `15. J _~O 1 ~ _ . \LS ~~ , ' J E I~ w N 'k 6 - ~ el - ~• ~ z ~ ~ R 1 a. ~,~ . ~~ ~I ~ ~ W ~ .. rQ~ ~ I1 r4~ ' ~~ • ~ V 1 VQi,\ alb Y nn~n i Y\ ?n- .© 0 w g O w U w ~m a ~o ~~ 00 ~~ ~m N ~ ti a f w 't o F w LL ~ Q N w m ~ ~ am ~ w' v u I g ~ I 3 •~ ?~ ~~,, -- __1 ~%.~ ~_., Q ~// / F• ;,III ~ / ~ i ~'Fi I ~~ z' ~ :i i ~j -~ I i i ". ~\ e f F ~~ j~/ / / 2 I ~ °IJ .~ ~ Q III Ifi I, I)•~± !'I!~ I ~~/ ~," ~~~ ~ "I'll i i= ~ -- _ 1, ,~ ~ 'M ---~il%~,~i r ~---~ I I l~ // / ~' 1. .Q ~"1 ~ ' s ~ ~;'~~ W ~ ~/!/~ ~» ~ W Q w m w a Z Z a ? w W J Q Q Q U r ;u a \ ~'' vet ~ ~ , I 1~~ . 1 ``~ ;:~ i:, . ,!+ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~.~~ li-~~~,~~ a i ' ;~/ a ,/`. i ~ ]y /~ p i ~. /'i,, ~~ jij ~ ~ 'Its r O ~///~{ ln~~ _.` I 'ism' n /, J/ ~~ Q 'i II'\ t~~l ~~I / c•'.~ ' j ,'.'~ . s ~ 'i 4 i Il ~ -; ~ i , ~/ u z ~ L-- 1 ^ ~p2+ W // f d ~' / /% ,~ .. a ~, ., ~, ~ a 0 ~ ~ ili~ m l1 ~ ~ ~ ,~ z - ~ _ --... ;.. _ ~ -- _ ~, t ono _i~r ~ 1D i~ 3 o ~. V U ~! 0~ ~F ry' ~.d~ ~• o °, S C ~1H W 2 X W z~/ eg s ~ t:, , _~ / ~v~ ~~~ / CmN ( _ 'I / U '. ~~' •.~ ~~' 111 /. m~ ~%, / r l5 C / /r - I L u~ N :~/~~ / /~~ & ~ \ \ / ~/afl ~\~ 1 ~,,~ ~ -~ r~~rllbd (I IIJ AYIIA ~"1110 /'(I~-I- 1y l ,f/; '~ „~ ~~u-- _ a -~ --'-3na 1 ~ r E_p i'` ~~ ) `--~ f ~~ a L V 9 ~ a ~ R 7 ' --1 \ z w z J Q w Q z w O w Q ~ ~ ~_ I. ' 1 ~ ~ U I -R ~-I I ~ z R a' U ( !; f I i ~J. •.i i I I ~ I ~~,~ - CITY OF RANCHO CliCAMONGA _ STAFF REPORT ,~-~ DATE: May 3, 1989 ' T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~ FROM: 3rad Buller, City Planner '~, SUBJECT: REPGRT ON ITEMS BROUGHT UP BY GENE ULLRICH AT APRIL 19, 1989 ~I I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council discuss e ar't~ eas a~~ressed by Mr. Ullrich at the April 19 City Council meeting and provide staff with comment and direction. tI. INTRODUCTION: Mr. Gene Ullrich, resident and single family ome~owner near Lemon and Avenue (10410 Lemon Avenue), spoke at the last City Council meeting regarding his observations of a recently processed project near his home. He requested that the City Council consider opening discussion on the subject of project review and processing. In the area of public noticing, he raised comment on the written project description, the posttng and the noticing. He stated that the project description should be written in a way that Ts understandable to the homeowner. He also scgyataJ Li~uL uii yruyuaeu ~ummereiai protects oe poscetl and signed with large 4' x 8' notice boards. fie last was that all mailed notices should be addressed not only to the homeowners, but also to the current occupants of the residence. Mr. Ullrich also raised the issue with the existing provision of the Development Code that allows for car washes within Neighborhood Commercial Districts with a Conditional Use Permit. He believed they should not be permitted at all in the neighborhood commercial centers. III. ANALYSIS: 1. Project Description: Project descriptions are prepared attempt ng o es describe a project in laymen's terms, Generally ;peaking, project descriptions have been clear and have provided sufficient descriptions for individual interested in the development of the site if they wish to pursue further investigation of the project or not. In the past, we have received very little, if any, concern from the public as to our project descriptions. However, we will take note of Mr. Ullrlch's concerns and improve our screening of the written project descriptions. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: MR. ULLRICH COMMENTS 4/19 CC MfG. May 3, 1989 Page 2 2. Project Posting: The Development Code requires that a protect of a propose nfi11 development with higher intensity of land use than that of the existing neighborhood be posted with a 4' x 8' notice board. Rancho Cucamonga is one of very few cities in California which uses this highly visible means for notification. To address Mr. Ullrich's concern in this area, an amendment can be made to clarify this section of the Code and specifically require the posting of a 4' x 8' notice board for all commercial projects. 3. Project Notices: Project ownership lists are required fer all pu~l~cTiear~items. The developer submits three sets of typed labels of all property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property. This list is obtained from the latest equalized assessment roll issued by the San Bernardino County Assessor. Mr. Ullrlch requested that notices be mailed to both the owner and the current occupant of the residence. This can be done, but would require sending double notices to each property. To add to each notice "ar current resident" as suggested will not meet legal requirements if the property 1s leased or rented because tenants will not necessarily forward the information to the landlord who is the one legally entitled to the notice of hearing. 4. Car Hashes: This area of Mr. Uilrich's comments can only be aadress~e 'by a Development Code Miendment. If the City Council determines that review of the provision for allowance of a car wash in a Neighborhood Commercial District should be undertaken, staff should be directed to study this matter and forward it to the Planning Commission for their consideration. An amendment can be processed to prohibit car washes 1n neighborhood commercial centers. However, it is important to note that these uses are only conditionally penmitted and not permitted as a matter of right in neighborhood commercial centers. This gives the City the ability to impose Conditions of Approval to control the development, operations and maintenance of these facilities. If car washes were totally excluded from the Neighborhood Ca~tmerefal desTynation, these facilities could generally only develop in the industrial areas of the City and limited segments of Foothill Boulevard. It should also be noted that on April 25, the developer of the neighborhood center submitted his revised appticatlon for a Conditional Use Permit for a coin-operated car wash and related automotive service uses for the second phase of his center. X03 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: MR. ULLRICN COMMENTS 4;19 CC MIG. May 3, 1989 Page 3 IV. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, staff believes Mr. Ullrich's comments on no c ng for public hearings were very good. Protect descriptions are writter. to be easily read and understood y~tF-e omen owner and staff will continue to implement this goal. Protect pos^tin9 of commercial developments with a 4' x 8' public nof~ sign can be accomplished by either directing staff, under the existing Code to do so, or if specific clarification is desired, a Code amen Anent specifically addressing commercial properties can be processed. Protect notices are not currently addressed and mailed as reques e~y rM-. UTTrich, but can be accomplished by requiring, with the protect submittal, two separate notices to each property. This would, however, impact Planning Division's current budget protections for notices and mailings, but this can be compensated with an increase in submittal fees. Lastly, Car washes are currently conditionally penaitted uses within fi~"e l~fg~6orhood Commercial land use designation. If the City Council determines that it would be appropriate to initiate a Development Code Amendnent to prohibit car washes in these districts, staff should be directed to place this on the Planning Commission's work program. Respe ly su ed, /Bra 7 rC/\~ City P nner BB:ko `'~J -~---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 3, 1989 k~ _ s ~. `i TO: Mayor Stout, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM: Jerry 8. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR AREA EAST OF DEER CREEK AND NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council approve the boundaries as outlined on Exhibit B establishing Landscape Maintenance Districts for area east of Haven Avenue and north of Fourth Street. Analysis/Background; With the increased development in the easterly portion of the City, StaEE has determined that definitive boundaries should be considered for future annexations and/or formation of landscape maintenance districts. Various aspects were considered; location, types of existing and proposed landscaping, and estimated maintenance costs. The boundaries 1. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 2. Victoria Planned Community; 3. Terra Vista Planned Community; 4. Area north of Highland Avenue between Deer Creek and Day Creek; 5. Area north of Highland Avenue between Day Creek and the Easterly City Limit; and 6. Landscape Maintenance District NO. 3-B (Commercial/Industrial) 7. Remaining area south of Highland and not within any other district. R spec tf ally Submitted, l\ n /1 ~~ Y t _/J ~~/ Jerry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBF:de Attachments: Exhibit A - Table Exhibit B - Map Exhibit A City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance Districts Area East of Haven Ave. Landscape District No. 1 Gen. City $25/unit Landscape District No. 2 Victoria $195/unit 48.75/acre/vacant land Landscape District No. 3-B Conn./Ind. $160/acre Landscape District No. 4 Terra Vista $105/unit Landscape District No. 6 Caryn $195/unit Landscape District No. 7 North Etiwanda $700/unit ..Y...T 1~.C _______.. ...,. _ .... .. .... .......3645 .. n......G....... c.. O ~P - CITY OF RANCHO CtiCA&IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 19, 1989 i0: Mayor and Members of Lhe City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner _., J SUBJECT: ANNEXATION 89-03 - BLACKMON HOMES, INC. - A request m approve a statement o n n on m nex a 25 acre portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area located at the northeast corner of Rochester Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN: 225-152-O1, 02, 03, and 04. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached eso u ion o Intent m Annex which authorizes staff to submit an application for annexation and a Plan of Services m the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). ;i. BACKGROUND: The attached Resolution of Intent m Annex and a c e exhibits are for approximately 25 acres of vacant land. The nrnnar4y Ie irv~a row ALwr1~ --_L Of LhC .•; J^ n~~,~;wd Community and north of Highland Avenue The applicant, Blackmon Homes, Inc. has also submitmd applications far a Development Districts Amendment (Pre-Zone) for the su6,ject Draperty. The site is locamd within the Nest Valley Foothills Connunity Plan u Mer the County's ,)url5dictlon. The site is currently designated under the County's General Plan for residential land use up to 4 dwel ling units per acre. Under the City's General Pian, the site is designamd Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). The pre-zone application is for !ow Residential ;2-4 dwelling units per acre) in conformance with the City's General Plan designation. The pre-zone application and development agreement are scheduled fora Planning Commission hearing on May 24, 1989 and for Cfty Council hearing on June 21, 1989. In addition, an annexation agreement will be presenmd m the City Council with the above items. 0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ANNEXATION 89-03 - BLACKMON HOMES, INC. Apr 11 19, 1989 Page 2 The subject site has an approved tentative tract map, approved by the Canty on December 19, 1988. 'The tract map consists of 78 lots at approximately 3.2 dwelling units per acre. As conditioned by the tract, the applicant has initiated annexation into the City and therefore, has not submitted any additional plans to the County. The development of residences in this tract annexation will go through the City review process. III. CONCLUSION: Adoption of the Resolution of Intent to Annex is the rTf~~ep leading to the annexation and development on this property. Res u11y tted, ad B Ci nne BB:JG:m1g Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Ra mtu Linn fln:la ri na intent to Mnex with Atta rhmants Plan of Services LAFCO Application ~~O CITY OF' R~'vCHO Ci~(AMONC,~-1 I'LAiVNIiVG IXVLSpN ~ ~~ V ~! ~I'H ,TEn4: oev~ov~rrr asrnicTS axEwwErrt eaoi TITLES ~~~ ~ EXHIBITS 'a• SG1LE~ ~€ RESOLUTION N0. V ~- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO UTAERTAKE VRO%EEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTN EAST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE ANO HIGHLAND AYENUE. RffER TO FILE, ANNEXATION 89-03 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, the above described property is located within and consistent with the established Sphere of Influence of the City, and contiguous to current City limits; aM WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is vacant and uninhabited, and a description of the bou Maries of the territory fs set forth in Exhibit "1" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the annexation of the property will represent a logical extension of the City's boundaries and urban services; and WHEREAS, tt is the City's intention to Drovide the usual and necessary urban services to the area upon annexation, as outlined in the Plan of Services; and WHEREAS. the Citv has determined that the annexation of the property to the City would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that the property will provide for development within the Cfty in a manner consistent with the City's General Plan and with related development; and NHEREAS, the City Council as governing body of the City of Rar~ho Cucamonga desires to initiate proceedings fora Change of Organization (Annexation) for the sub,lect property pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 560D of the California Government Code; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council as the governing body of the City or Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby adopt, approve, resolve, determine, and order as follows: SECTION 1: Application and proposal is hereby made to the Local Agency Forma on ammissian of the County of San Bernardino for Change of Organization (Annexation) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga of the herein described property as outlined in the Justification form, which is Exhibit "A" to this Resolution, aM fs by this reference incorporated herein as though fully set forth in accordance to the terms and conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, ~/D CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. ANNIXATION 89-03 April 19, 1989 Page 2 SECTION 2: The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certifie c~~y of this Resolution with the Executive Officer of the Lacal Agency Formation Commission of the County of~5an Bernardino. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED thls 19th day of April 1989. .~~r PLAN FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES (Attachment). The purpose of this attachment is to briefly outline the factors of consideration relative to this annexation request and to briefly expand Upon the information presented in the Plan for Municipal Services form. FACTORS OF CONSIDERATION: A. Maximum Possible Service Area. The area proposed for annexat on contains approx matey 25 acres and fs iota ted fully within Rancho Cucamonga's Sphere of Influence. as the following information clearly indicates, the area in question is also clearly within the maximum possible service area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The area is adjacent to current City Limits on the west and south, and represents a logical exixnsion of the City s ur s c on. 8. Range of Services. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Ts a general aw y an s legally authorized as well as capable of providing the full renge of necessary urban services within its boundaries. Currently, a full range of necessary urban services is provided within the City Limits by the City and by several independent districts cooperating with the City. The same level of service provided by the City and its cooperating A ictrir is ie nrnnn eaA to ha nrnvt AnA in tha annexatinn area C. Projected Future Population Growth. The site is currently aces gnats on a aun yTs Fesi Valley Foothills Commnity Plan as RES 4 (4 dwellin units per acre). the Cfty's Generai Plan al owslresiaen a ens tTs up i-4 dwelltng units per acre. D. Type of Development Occurring or_ Planned. The County of San erne no as approve a eve opmeni: project for this site Tract Map TT 13835. The approved plan calls for the eve o-~f-78~wellin units. The City has corked claseT w e oun y a e eve oper in the preparation of the development plans, a M fallowing annexation, will permit development of the project in substantial conformance with the f7lniy approvals. E. Dresent and future Service Needs. due to Lhe uMeveloped na re o e s te, Curren on-site service needs are minimal. They consist Drlmarlly of fire and police protection. It should be noted that this levei of service will be clearly inadequate should the property develop in d~~ PLAN FOR MUNIC [PAL SERVICES Page 2 accordance with the County approved plans, and extensive urban services would be required prior to development regardless of whether such development would occur to the County or City. The development of this site with 78 units, as approved by the County, would require sewer and r~r services, electricity, nawral gas, telephone, solid waste disposal, police and fire protection, schools, libraries, parks and recreation, and other services normally associated with urban intensity development. As already noted, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its cooperating districts are capable of providing a full range of required services. Local A envies Presently Servin the Area. The study area is presen y serve y o aw ng ova agencies: Chino Basin Municipal Water District; Foothill Fire Protection District; San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department; Southern California Edison Conpany; Southern California Gas Coapany; Pacific Bell Telephone; San Bernardino County Departaent of Transportation and Flood control; Etiwanda elementary School Dtstrict; Chaffey Joint Union High School District; Canty of San Bernardino Libraries. As already noted above, the level and range of services currently provided by these local agencies is minimal, and only adequate to meet present limited service needs. G. Social and Economic interdependence. As already noted, the s s con guaus a ex s ng City boundaries on the south and west, and depends for access on existing and planned Lynn na tin r4 Thn <i}n is rlnwly rata lnA in ihn City of Rancho Cucamonga and will depend on the City and its associated districts for the necessary urban services. Residents of the site will also depend on businesses Tn the City for their commercial and economic needs. H. Agricultural Preserves. No part of the property is located w~ifn any Aft amson t Agricultural Preserves. II, MUNICIPAL SERVICES A. Sewer Service. Due to the undeveloped nature of the site, na sewer sere ces are currently being provided. However, the site lies in the ,jurisdiction of Cucamonga County Nater District for sewer collection and Lhe Chino Basin Municipal Na tPr District for wa sie treatment disposal and reclamation, Upon annexation by Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, both Cucamonga County NaLer Dtstrict and Chino Basin Municipal Nater Dtstrict will continue to be the service providers for the area. ~/3 PLAN FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES Page 3 B. Mater Services. No water services are currently befog prov e e to the undeveloped nature of the site. However, the site is located within the service bouMaries of the Cucamonga County Hater District, which will continue to be responsible for the provision of water to the site UDOn annexation. C. Cable Television. Cable service is not currently provided m e area. on annexation, cable TV will be provided by private vendors under a City franchise. D. Electrici Electric service is a M will continue to be prov e y Southern California Edison Upan annexation and development of the site. E. Solid Waste. The site is currently not being served. Upon annexat on, private vendors will provide both collection and disposal services order a franchise 6y the City of Rancho Cucamonga. F. Streets. Kith the exception of Route 30 along the southerly au ar es of the site and Rochester Avenue on the west, there are no streets ar roads currently serving the area. Upon annexation and development of the site, the developer will be responsible for construction of alt public streets in accordance with County and City approvals. Upon substantial completion of the street improvements, the City will assume ... «,..~~~n~i,.,, a.. ..,~~b.. we ..,n .....,.. ........,~.,,. T".: .. costs are estimated at f4 495.31 per year. The ongoing cost of street lighting will~ie a~sortied through an annexation to (or formation of) a lighting assessment district. G. Flood Control. Current flood control protection is provided y~e~nBernardino County Flood Control District. Upon annexation, regional flood control issues affecting the site will continue to be controlled by Lhe Flood Control District; local drainage and flood control protection will fall under the ,iurtsdiction of the City. H. Community Development. Current planning and Code Enforcement serv ces are prov ed by San Bernardino Canty. Upon annexation, the City will assume full responsibility for the services at an estimtted annual cost of ;488.00. I. Leisure Services. No parks and recreation services are Curren y e ng provided. Upon annexation and development ~r~ PLAN FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES Page 4 ofthe site, the developer will be responsible for paying City Park Fees. In addition, City wide rec reation programs cures-run by the city will become available to the new residents of the developed site. Finally, library and museum services, currently provided by San Bernardino County, will remain under the County's ,jurisdiction. J. Police Protection. Police protection is currently provided by n ernardino Canty Sheriff's Rancho Cucamonga Substatfon. Upon annexation, LAe County Sheriff will continue to provide police services for the area. K. Fire Protection. The Foothill Fire Protection District curre~n yl-provides fire and rescue services to the area. Upon annexation, the District will continue to provide the necessary services for the project site. No paramedic services are currently provided or planned. L. Ambulance Services. Private vendors currently provide a u ante serv ces to the site. Upon annexation, these services will continue to be provided by private vendors. M Animal Control. Mimal control is currently provided by San erna no aunty. Upon annexation, San Bernardino Canty will continue to provide animal control services. N. khools. The site is located in the Chaffey Joint Union High cT}-iooT-District and the Etiwanda Elementary School District. noon anilPYatjem and dPVPl oameaL; the site will contime to be served by the Etiwanda Elementary School District (K-8) and Chaffey Joint Union High khool District. Preliminary discussions with the Etiwanda School District indicate that the schools are at or near capacity in the area. Potential new school site have been identified Tn the immediate nearby area. The School District does have the ability to charge fees in accordance with SB 29ffi and Tn addition has a one time special district tax of f1,600 per dwelling unit. I11. SUMMARY The site is located in the City's Sphere, tt is contlguas to the City haurdarles on the south, and west and represents a logical extension of the current City limits. The City, with assistance of its cooperating agencies, is authorized and capable of providing the full range of necessary urban services for the site. The annexation area is uninhabited and the City's petition for annexation is supported by 100% property owner can sent. d' V >V C 2 (Nil vii I U A r r. pt f {~i] O °C rn E ul V ro V a ~ a U Q S ~ C U ~ G ~ LL ~ o z I~ 4 {t1 O m 6 y F F J U w 1 .a I v o ~ 0 {a ~ 6' Y p~ •+f N fO 1~ ~~ O O O ~(1 U O O r O O O O O O O O ~ ~ N) tl O<O V 6 `+ y I I I I 1 ,Q 01 0 ~O p 0 I I m • O O O O V a u+ m I A o m I I I I I Y p q O N N 1 1 H F 8 CO T I C' • m in N m U t' ~• a vj G ~o u u. v r ti U ~+ UT Uf n M O O O o " " W~ 9 v v ~ w ~ v v v v m v v A A ro A A CP lT b~ tT tr~ 0+ y O 0 rl 0 O C C C G C G C ~~ ,5 E 1~ Y P~ / al N N ro N N N R •' G U U U U A F .C .C F t t e W y~ Z 0 0 O O U U V U U U U ,N [ a w .-..-. O 0 0 0 0 O \ 0 0 ~v A A Z A A Z Z ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z F O a0 M ° N N N N N N N N N N N N m v v v v v v v v v v v v N Y H N H N N H 4 S. H M 10 / U U U U U U U U U U U U c "r a a a a a a a a s a a s .. F w ~. ill ~ N N Vt ~. ~^. :(1 ~^, .1 •_^. OC N N N N N N N N N N N N bL a ro ro N m m ro ro m ro m z ro ro F F N VI ~ r .+ ~ ~ ^ w' c a a v 6 H F N U N E E w w Z Z Z 2 > Z O O O O U U V U U w 4 x 5 x ~ fA w `° ~ m x ° ~ a a m 0 0 0 o i m m z z z m ~i y u~ w w z a u w w 6 .. N ~ O C V G > N w C C A p Y 8 a > Y U ~ C ~ C Y « a e W q 5 • ti , , e m s i y r O 0 . ~ ~ c ~ ' ° ° ~ ~ d ~ ~ : i ~ a ~ a c .~ 1 . g ~ u I d v Y Y N a u 0 C O N a r d~~ 5 , o ,. .., b h 1/f V o ~ n vi a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 8 C .M F W / o p u o 0 0 m 7• N L' o 6 v t l y 1•' U 9 ~ V U M 6 a + a O 7 ' ~ O 'J O O O 'J O o 0 7 O O .u O ~ C - ~ ^ 8~ M yr M ~.N U U U~ uR > d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . u• I E + O c rn o. a. rn rn rn rn o. a a m m K n U O rn -r m . rn D` ~ m .. i u u ~ 9 M O L ' C ~ u ~ ~ y V U U u I U p O N Y Y N ~ Y ~ G ,] O O O O J O O O O O O p p Z ! W as J U J O U C ... .-.. .-. ~ ^. .--, .~ ~ .~ .--. .-. ^ ~ ~ -~ ~ o o a a a a a a a a a a a a .-. .. d a a a z z t-ma v R u N M U b W A n W A t!+ I[1 u't u'f I[1 {() 1() 1h ~ ~(1 Ih ~ t(f ~[f 1(1 .rl U M 1[1 N I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ^ ^ ^ ^ N N N N ~O T ~C ~O {'~ L ~6 m. R A p {~ v v ~ p G O O ~ G 3 0 0 0 S 3 3 i t c ' 3 3 3 C O p O U C ^ c O V O U O U C m L ~"~ N N N ~/1 N T N T I F N N N N N C N m N m N m C C a C q1 Z O O O• O O O O O Y W O 2 O 2 Z Z N Z ~ c c C N N N > V U ~ V V U '•- V I I V U V V V U V (.J O. I ~ I I I I ~ I I i I l I ' I I I 1 1 1 1 1 i ~ u ^ c ~ o C U A m m N Oy u ~u u ; O ,B J C ~ C u u M Y •rl .. i C V N ~ N m M •n N V N yi. N h e u r G G V m w m G •~ M w H u s = R N = U O k ~ m 9 ~ ~ OUO O M P. ~ U 4 U M •.~I U w N _ O ~ N F 4 U N -1 8 ~ U F- O 0.' ~ 4 IA O a u V O a N Y 6 ~ ~ A •, ~ ~ . -+ I ~ U W N F S > . L h = I C L C v X W U u .~ u C N V U N c L u :9 N H d 1 1 EXHI82T 'A' Justification for proposal one preliminary Envi rommental Description Fora For LAFCO Use Only T0: Local Agency Formation Cauan ssion ' 175 wesT Fifth Stmt. Second Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0:90 (714) 787-5866 Itli R00UR[OH: The quests dns in LMi fort art deslgn<d to Detain enough data abeui the proposed project site to allow the Comni scion and staff Lo atlegwtety assess the project. By taking tn! time to fu11v respond to the aveztions Below. you cen rodu<e tree processing ;ime for rove nroiect. You may alto inclp<! any atltliti Dregs iniormetron wnicn ypu Deli eve a peen nent. USe aotlib onal sneers mere neces. sa ry, <r a:aq ary ^levart documents. GEIIEAAL INFORMATION / 1, NAME OF PROPOSAL: Annexation #89-G3 2. APPLIGANi: Bla clmon Homes, Inc. 3. GENERAL LOCATION: Nortnwest corner of Rochester and Hichland- Rancho Cucamonga 4, Does tree ap011 cats en ppssess IOOS written cgnsent of each Droperty owner in Ne subjett territory! YES 7C NO ~ (IT YES, attACn wri ctM authorizations.) - 5. Intli care the +easans treat :ne Droposed sctton Ns been requested. Aonlirant and city desire nrooerty to be annexed. a, •.. - ... - , --. - _._ •^••t1y nr. xnbmntiallr surrounded 1sl+nd of unincorporated terri- tory? •TES• NO-X'••I1 TES, pease justtty the proposed Doundery +nd +ttach that justifica- [ion to this application. SANG USF AND DEYFIODMENi POTENTIAL 1. io cal lane area: Aror oximately 25 acres. 2. Dwe111ng units in Brea: 78 3. ADPraximte DoDulation in tree: Gninhabited 4. :n Ei cote the General PLn gesigna ti an of the affected city (if any): LOw den5lty residential, 2 .c 4 dwellings per acre. San Bernardino County General Pltn designation: RES-4 5. Oescriee any speciai land use concerns esprcssed in the aoove plans. Development aereemenC will be entered into in conjunction with annexation. 6, Indira :e :he <xu:;ng iantl u:e. Vacant unat is :ne prvocsed Land u:e? P,esidential si.^.cle '_amile dwellings. 7, Indira :e :ne existing wunt% zpm ng ^tte +na densities peni::ec. RS Zone, 4 dwell inns per acre. :n process. 8. Has :ne ana seen pRZpned? YES NO gin :f •SS, .ra: a :ne p^ezpninq c'asiitica- :ion. tide, densi ;:es pens,t:ed low ~!''S1~~re5identidl, 2 t0 4 dwellinns per acr=. 9. Y111 the proposal regain 7uolit urvices from any agency ar dist~c vni en is currently ooentiny ai ar near caoaci ;y (including sever, war, pall ce. Hrt, or stnools )? YES X NO ~ , TES, Dlease explain. Schools-School fees paid per state approved fee schedule of $1.53 per square `.pot. P~~1N FOA SAVIC-cS Section 56653 of the 6overnmen: Cade opus rcs tna tubari ssi on of a Plan tar Arvf ces wttA very Droposai +„+«rated ova nsoivtion of a legislative body. Please at:acn :o this applivaon a narrative description of tn! fellM nq: 1. An enumentldn and desmDa pn of the senicas to be eatentled to tae +ffected temttory. Z. .,,A dezcrip:i an pf the level and Hoge of arose services. 7. An indl ca tion of wneo top se ze rvic<s can be extended U the study an 1. /. An Inoi cats on of any condttians the lout agency will impose ar npuin wltnin Lne study area if the proposal is aoonred (for eueole, the Payment o} fees, the upyndinq of atncturcs, roads, water and sewer facilta es, ecc.). 5. Infvnatlon vi:n rcsvec: :a haw the sera ces rill bn financed. 6. Lis: anE describe all spec ul locos tams, usasssn:i, !«s, puastanding bonds, eLt., toot will affect the proposal ana. NC~r: Sponsors df a Drcvp sal ins ;iaceC ny pe ti tt do m+Y subnst their prooa sal without a PLn /or Se•vrcez. In :nese cases. One tAFC~ dfh ce wt 11 notify the a}fec:ed ctty or df strict tNt they will be rcom red to suomtt a Plan for Servu<s. .~ FACTORS OF CONSIDEMTION LOR SPNERE Oi INFLUENCE REVIEN Please attach to this apDlica :i on a narraii ve Description of ine following: 1. Present and planned land uses in the arcs. 2, ine Orcsent and probable need far poetic tacf lities antl services in the area. 3, The present capacity of public facilities and adepua<y of pool is 5e rvices. 6, The existence of any sociel or etononic comunities in the area. ENV I ROXI~NTAI I NPoRMAT I ON 1. State general Description of tooography. T.c..o~. gcnt-i yr atnninrt- 2. Oescri be any existing improvements Sn the site as : of total area. 0.e si Dents al (1 1 Agricul turel f1 Z Covnmrcial n Yacant i nn s industrial n Othv n 3. Uestn a the avlac<ns Tana vnva. a, De;cri De site alterations that will of Droduced by improvement projects associated with Lois proposed ac:ian (grading, flow channelitati an, etc.). --°~~^^, a-=~nc-astd `+alY ctroat imprct omentc „ Nf1; service extensions a¢omplisnec Dy this proposal Induce growth on this site? YES .Y RO ~_ Aoja ten: sties? YEE NO X Uni nco rpoN ted J~ Incorporated 6, Is this project a part of a larger Dro]ect or series of pro]ects? YES NO X If YES, p,.a:c c.p ._..~. -a- NOTICES Please pravi de the names and atleresses of persons who arc to be furnished copies of the agende and staff rcpa rt and who arc to be given meiietl notice of hearing, xAME Blackmon Homes, Inc. TELEPNOX2 ND. 714-683-7688 ADDRESS 6964 Indiana Ave., 8202, P.iverside CA 92506 arry Henderson NAnE City of Rancho Cucamonga TELEPHONE x0. 714-989-1861 ADDRE55 P.0. Box 907, poncho Cucamonga, CA 91730 NAME TELEPHONE M0. ADDRE55 CE0.TIFTCATIOX I hereby ceRify that the statemnts furnished shore and fn the aLtachetl eshibits present LAe dsts and lnfarmati on repot rcd for Lois inlttal evaluation Lo the best of my sbiH ty, antl that the facts, statements, and information Dresentetl heRin are true and correct to the best of ary owletlge sod belief. ~~ll ~^~ DATE ~-.,C- d~ / - ._ _~.__.. _._._... I NRE 0 APPLICANT i'~ PxOxE 714-693-7688 6864'"Indiana Ave.. fi207. ' ADDRESS niv<a ei.l~, .... ~....06 To De encl esed with this form: 5 copies of this Eshi bit 'A' with Plan for Services 30 coPres Of the Yp 30 coptls of the 1egs1 description Z copies of the Yoter Location List Z copies o1 the Prczoni ng sntl Environmental Revlew Documents (i1 spell pole) 2 copies of the Resolution or Petition pf Initiation (ar Lndowner consent forms) A list of assessor's Dsrcet numbers Fi tf ng lees ,..m., ., STAFF REPORT v ~~GV~o~'1 ~I ~ °i' F,; J'`_ 19T DATE: May 3, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council '~j 2 FROM: Duane Baker, Adminiatrat ive Aeeietan~~j ~~ SUBJECT: RRSOLUTION SUPPORTING A99C!®LY BILL 1160 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Re eolut inn which supports Assembly Bill 1160, which removes homes that house wards of the court Erom the body of law that totally eliminate6 the City•e jurisdiction over the Biting of such homes. SACRGROUNO: on April 17, the City received a request from Assemblyman Charles Bader asking for our support of Assembly Bi11 1160. Assembly Hill 1160 ie dealgned to address a problem which ie currently happening in the City of Chino that could potentially occur in our City as well. In the City of China, the State Department of Social Services is deciding whether or not to locate a ^hst c_....,^ noose for juvenile criminela in a residential neighborhood, Because of existing at ate law, neither the City nor the neighbors have the legal ability to review nor influence this decision. Assembly Bill 11fi0, which is pending before the State Legislature, addresses this problem. It removes homes that house wards of the court from the body of law that totally eliminated the City's jurisdiction over siting of such homes. The attached Resolution ie not intended to decide the point of whether or not these ^half-way^ houses are good for society or not. The purpose of the attached Resolution ie to allow the City Council to go on record in support of any legislation which enhances the City's aDil ity to exert local control over planning and zoning issues. Because of the City Council~a reeponeibillty to the people of Rancho Cucamonga, ecaiP feels that support of Assembly Bill 1160 will only enhance the City Council's ability to respond to the needs of the community. DAE/dja Attached ..~.~1 RESOLUTION NO. B9=r+~'rg A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL 1160 WHICH REMOVES HOMES THAT HOUSE WARDS OP THE COURT FROM THE BODY OF LAW THAT TOTALLY ELIMINATES A CITY'S JURISDICTION OVhR THE SITING OF SUCH HOMES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ranchc Cucamonga feels that planning and zoning ieauee are best decided at the local level; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ie responsible and accountable to the cit izene of Rancho Cucamonga in matters relating to local zoning and planning; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hoe reviewed Assembly Bill 1160 and Einda that it enhances the City's ability to exert local control over planning and zoning ieauee, specifically where it applies to community care facilities for minors who are judged wards of the juvenile court pursuant to Section 601 or 602 of the Welfare and Inetitutione Coder who have been diverted from the formal juvenile court proceedings. NOWT THEREFORE, EE IT RESOLVBD that the City Council of the City of Rnncho Cucamonga hereby supports Aaeembly Bill 1160 and urges its passage by the California State Assembly. ee it further resolved that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga supports Assembly Bill 1160 specifically in how it relates to the City's ability Lo exert influence over the placement of community care facil it tee for minors who are judged wards of the juvenile court pursuant to Section 601 or 602 of the Welfare end Inetitutione Code. u~ n++ncau nncnc~er -r uauue ~. uw r mayu+ vi wa ~i+y u+ nauciw Cucamonga....... .~-3 CAPOOL ADDRFSS~. V ~ \ Suu Capnnl ///111 -/~/J,~1` ~ FAn<auon P O. RO. 91:819 `a Envirmuunul Skryk Szcnmmlo.CA 9iN9~0001 ~ ~ ~ Toix M.une4 19161 HS~Bi90 ~ FiN~Alnnm.nn DISTRICT ADDRESS ~~~~~~~~ RevrnucA Tex.tian .0? W<sl G Sven Omzna, CA 01 ]6: SURCOMMFFTEE: ~'+lii 9S?~MII r + Edunuon SUbcmnmma on C~ttit~nrixYtt e$YS.Ctt~ixx~ "iRM,E~~llnn .ss,Te •r. „'m REPLY TO: 3 CHARLES W. BADER ^ ONTARIO p { ASSEMBLYMAN, SIXTY~FIFTN DISTRICT ^ SACRAMENTO April 17, 1989 The Bonorable Dennis L. Stout 8104 Gardenia Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Mayor Stout: In the City of Chino, the State Department of Social Services is deciding whether or not to locate a "half-way" house for juvenile criminals in a residential neighborhood. Because of state law neither the City nor the neighbors have the legal ability to review nor influence this decision. The State has totally removed any local control over the siting of so called "half-way" houses in residential neighborhoods. You can imagine the effect on the neighborhood when six teenage wards of the court move in. Experience has shown that the crime rate typically goes up in the neighborhood. Property values and quality of life suffer for the neighbors. This problem isn't just a Chino problem. Most of the cities in our area, yours probably included, have the same problem. In some cases at least twenty such "homes" are located in the city. There is a bill pending before the State Legislature, AB 1160 (N. Waters), that addresses this problem. It removes homes that house wards of the court from the body of law that totally eliminated a cityls jurisdiction over the siting of such homes. I would like to encourage you and your council to support this bill. I realize that if this bill becomes law, we would have to develop a new program for housing juvenile criminals, who are wards of the court, after being released from a Youth Authority Facility. I would be eager to work with you and your council to develop an alternative to this program. I don't believe that forcing these facilities into a city neighborhood is the solution. I look forward to hearing from you soon. ou rtrul , har / s W. Bader ~ Enc: AB 1160 PAGE BILL NUMBER: AB 1160 BILL TEXT INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Norman Waters MARCH 2, 1989 An act to amend Sections 1505, 1520.5, and 1556 of [he Health ar.d Safety Code, relating to residential care facilities. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1160, as introduced, N. Waters. Residential care facilities. Existing law expressly excludes from the definition of community care facilities any place in which a juvenile is 'judicially' placed by court order, as specified. This bill would delete the word 'judicially' from that exclusion. Existing law generally requires the Director of Social Services to dent/ an application for a new residential care facility if the director determines that the new facility would result in overconcentration of those facilities, as defined. This bill would require the director or county licensing agency to notify the city or county planning agency within 10 days of the receipt of any application for a community care facility for minors adjudged wards of the juvenile cou:-t and to receive comments submitted in determining whether to grant a license. By requiring the county licensing agency to make the notification, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the director to impose the restrictions necessary to protect the health and safety of the neighboring residents and the general welfare of the community. Existiny law relating to community care facilities requires generally that .., idential facilities for six or fewer oarsons sha h ba n~nsid?red a residential use of property with respect to the application of local ordinances and for the purposes of any contract, deed, oY covenant for transfer of real property. This bill would expressly make these provisions inapplicable to facilities in which a juvenile adjudged a ward of the court is placed by order of the court, as specified. This bill would require the Auditor General to conduct a study of group homes and their supervision by the State Department of Social Services and to PAGE GILL NUMBER: AB 1160 BILL TEXT submit the study to the Legislature by June 30, 1990. The CaliEo:'n is Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement, including the creation of a State Mandates Claims Fund to pay the costs of mandates which do not exceed $1,000,000 statewide and other procedures for claims whose statewide costs exceed $1,000,000. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that this bill contains ecsts mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to those statutory procedures and, if the statewide cost does not exceed $1,000,000, shall be made from the State hfa ndates Claims Fund. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. TfIE PEOPLE OF THE SPATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: acu :ten :. seccton 15ub of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read: 1505. This chapter does not apply to any of the following: (a) Any Health facility, as defined by Section 1250. (b) Any clinic, as defined by Section 1202. (c) Any juvenile placement facility approved by the California Youth Authority or any juvenile hall operated by a county. (d) Any place in which a juvenile is jedte;a~i;y placed pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 727 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. (e) Any child day care facility, as defined to Section 1596.750. (E) Any facility conducted by and for the adherents of any well-recognized church or religious denomination foe the purpose of pt•ovidinq facilities for the care or treatment of the sick who depend upon prayer or spiritual means f:or healing in the practice of the religion of the church or denomination. (g) Any school dormito:-y or similar facility determined by the department. (h) Any house, institution, hotel, homeless shelter, or other similar place that supplies board and room only, or room only, or board only, provided that no resident thereof requires any element of care as determined by the direcCOr. (i) Recove:•y houses or other similar facilities providing gt•oup living a rr angements for persons recovering from alcoholism or drug addiction where the facility provides no care or supervision. (j) Any alcoholism recovery facility as defined by Section 11834.11. d~W PAGE BILL NUMBER: AB 1160 BILL TEXT (k) Any arrangement for the receiving and care of persons by a relative or any arrangement for the receiving and care of persons from only one family by a close friend of the parent, guardian, or conservator, if the arrangement is not for financial profit and occurs only occasionally and irregularly, as defined by regulations of the state department. ( 1) Any similar facility determined by the director. SEC. 2. Section 1520.5 of the Health and Safety Cnde is amended to read: 1520.5. (a) The Legislature hereby declares it to be the policy of the state to prevent overconcentrations of residential care facilities which impair the integrity of residential neighborhoods. Therefore, the directot- shall deny an application for a new residential care £acility license if the director determines [hat the location is in such proximity to an existing residential cart facility as would result in overconcentration. (b) As used in this section, 'overconcentration' means [hat if a new license is issued, there will be residential care facilities which are separated by a distance of 30G feet or less, as measured from any point. upon the outside walls of the structures housing such facilities. Based on special local needs and conditions, the director may approve a separation distance of less than 300 feet with the approval of the city or county in which the proposed facility will be located. (c) At least 45 days prior to approving any application for a new residential care facility, the director, ot- county licensing agency, shall notify, in writing, the city or county planning authority in which the facility will be located, of the proposed location of the facility. (d) Any city or county may request denial of the license applied for on the oasts of ove rconcentrat ton o[ residential care facilities. (e) Nothing in this section authorizes the director, on the basis of ovet-c oncentration, to t-e EVSe to renew a residential care facility license or to t-efuse to grant a license upon a change of ownership of an existing reside n.tial care facility where there is no change in the location of the Facility. (f) Foster family homes and residential care facilities tot- the elderly shall not; be considered in determininy overconcentration of residential care facilities, and license applications foi- such facilities shall not be denied upon the basis of overconcentration. (g) Within 10 days of receipt of a~ application for a community care facility for minors adjudged wards of the juvenile court pursuant to Sectio~01 or 602 of the Welfare and _ 'nr L~ ^dc who have beer d:ve:ted from Normal iuvenilz c oa rtFproceedings, the director, or county licensing agency, shall notify, in writing, the city or county lap nnin~C authority in which the facility will be located, of the application and the proposed location of the facility. The director, or county licensinq agency, shall provide to the city or county planning authority, a copy of the application, and shall eceive and consider all comments thereon submitted ~ the city or county, or other interested parties, in d'd PAGE BILL NUMBER: AB 1160 BILL TEXT detet-mining whether to rant a license 'the director shall im ose the restric necessary to protect the health and s~ residents, and tTe general welfare of cy~. ~rne cttY or a~ hearing to ~~... ~. 5eccton i5oo of the Health and Safety Code is amended to Bead: 1566. Ti,e Legislature hereby declares that it is the policy of this state that each county and city shall permit and encourage the development of sufficient numbers and types of residential care facilities as are commensurate with local need. The provisions of this article shall apply equally to any chartered city, general law city, county, city and county, district, and any othe t- local public entity. Fot- the put-poses of this article, 'six or fewer persons' does not include the licensee or members of the licensee's family or persons employed as facility staff. The provisions of this article shall not a~p1y to a~ lace in which a juvenile is lp aced pursuant to subdivtsion (a) of Section `727 of the Welfare and Instltutions Code. SEC. 4. The Auditor General shall conduct a study of group homes and of the supervision of those facilities by the State Department of Social cervices. The study shall specifically review the number of group homes in California by county, the health and safety inspection process of the homes, the fees paid to the group home administrator per child, and the uses of those fees. The A~~iLuc gene cars report sna11 be submitted to the Legislature by June 30, 1990. SEC. 5. Notwithstanding Section 17610 of the Government Code, if the Cantu fission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Pa t-t 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of uivision 4 of 'title 2 of the Government Code. If the statewide cost of the claim for t-e im bursement does not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000), reimbursement shall be made from the State Mandates Claims Fund. Notwithstanding Section 17580 of Che Government Code, unless otherwise specified in this act, the provisions of this act shall become operative on the same date that the act takes effect pursuant to the California ConstituCion. Q v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p~cnMp~ MEMORANDUM 2~~' 9^ SIT Date: To: April 27, 1989 o-ll is F_' ~ Z D Mayor Stout and Member of the City Council lv;; ~ From: Jack Lam, City Manager ~{~~-1~~(~ 8y: Russell H. Mayui ,City'Engineer l'~plil// Su63ect: Efforts to Improve Caltrans Local Agency Cooperation The malority of contacts made with Caltrans by the Engineering Division of our city is made with the Local Streets and Roads Branch, the Permits/Development Review Branch and the Construction Branch. We have received excellent response from the Local Streets and Roads Branch whenever our City has applied for funds administered by this branch. However, when submitting plans and specifications for review by the Permits/Development Branch, the process culminating Tn a permit to do the work has became a lengthy one. At times, problems have been encountered with the field personnel of Caltrans' Construction Branch. For better coordination and cooperation between our City and Caltrans Administration have met with the new Caltrans District Engineer and Deputy District Directors a number of times. The response and feedback has been positive. Engineering staff has met many times with Caltran's Branch Chiefs and their staffs to try and iron out particular problems on specific projects. Usually, we give ground on comments that are marginal ... uuLu,e jueL Lu be cooperanve ono to speed up the process. We are even picking up convents after a Caltran's plan check and hand-carrying our re-submittals. Also, on occasion, our Engineering staff has tried to resolve problems arising during construction because of inadequate coordination between Caltrans field personnel and their office Review Branch. All this effort has been met with cooperation by most Branch Chiefs, however, the cooperation has not been present at the lower staff level, where numerous calls and meetings have occurred. There continues to be a lack of understanding of the intent of the permit applications by this level of employee. Thus, the work toward developing any settlement and getting any agreement among City and state senior staff is again undone by delays at other levels. Every attempt to improve a working relationship with Caltrans has and is being made, especially by Engineering staff, so that Caltrans can better respond in timing, approvals and issuance of a permit. Caltrans has a new State Director and our area has a new District Engineer. The Inland City Managers Group has met recently with new management to convey cities concerns about Caltrans operation. The CLOUT group has voiced the same concerns to new management in hopes of affecting position change. The Mayor Stout and Members of the City Council Efforts to [mprove Caltrans Local Agency Cooperation April 27, 19$9 Page Two new management agrees to be sympathetic to the cities' pleas for Dare reasonable attention but the Judgment is still out about management's capability to affect change through the ranks. Top management acknowledge that this will take Lime, as the agency has Did entrenched tradition. All they have asked is they be given a chance to address these local agency concerns. M organization like Caltrans does not change overnight. RNM:MO:pam ~ 3ca EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Revised Draft) ~~ad~~,;~~~_ =..~ ; I~~H MARCH 1989 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN (Revised Draft) March 1989 The informatiop rnntained herein is a summary of each of the chapters in the County of $fn Bernardino Revixd Draft Hanrdons Waste Management Plan (CHWMP). The goals and policies/actions are D*esented in entirety after each chapter sommary. Chapter 2 bas no recommended goals ar policies, while Chapter 11 includes a recommended xhedule for implcmcntatioo of CHNIHP programs. r L • CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Proper hazardous waste management wnstitutes one of the s[atds major environmental concerns. Statewide recognition of the need for better nsethods of hazardous waste management came about by the intense media attention on improper disposal practices. Hazardous chemicals play an important role in our modern society. They contribute [o the manufacture of a vast array of consumer products (i.e., televisions, computers, automobiles, end medicines) and the convenience of consumer services (i.e., dry cleaners, automotive repair). While these goods and services add to our quality of life, they also cause the generation of hazardous waste. Reducing our reliance on hazardous materials would reduce the generation of waste. Hazardous waste will continue to be generated, however, since some materials have no substitutes. For this reason, a comprehensive plan is necessary to identity end promote programs for the reduction of hazardous waste end the safe management of wastes that remain after treatment or recycling. AB 2948 (Chapter 1504, Statutes of 1986) and amending legislation SB 477 (Chapter 1167, Statutes of 1987), AB 3206 (Chapter 1389, Statutes of 1988), AB 3209 (Chapter 378, Statutes of 1988), and AB 34 (pending), recognized the need to have a comprehensive program for management of wastes by • authorizing counties to develop a local hazardous waste management Dlan. The law has as its goals: - the safe and responsible management of hazardous waste; the effective siting of hazardous waste facilities that involves local and state governments, the public, and private industry; and the prevention of permanent hazardous waste disposal into the land or emission in the air without first processing the waste by an economically and technically feasible alternative technology. On March 31, 1967 the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors authorized the preparation of the County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (CHWMP). A resolution was adopted and sent to the State Department of Health Services specifying the County's desire to prepare the C}iWMP, The Plan is consistent with state law and the Guidelines for Preparation of Hazardous Waste Management Plans prepared by the Department of Health Services, lone 1987. .4 Cinai ^_opy of the CHWMP must be submitted to the California Department of Health Services (DHS) by June 1, 1989. State law specifies that the CHWMP must be approved by a majority of the cities within the County which contain a majority of the population of the incorporated area of the County. Once the Plan has been approved by DHS, the County has 180 days from the date the DHS approves the CHWMP to incorporate applicable portions of the Plan by reference into the County's general ES-I plan, or enact an ordinance requiring all applicable zoning, subdivision, • conditional use permit, and variance decisions to be consistent with the CHWMP. The cities are also required by state law to adopt some Corm of a Hazardous Waste Management Plan. The law specifies that cities are required to do one of the following: 1) adopt a City Hazardous Waste Management Plan which is consistent with the CHWMP; 2) incorporate applicable portions of the CHWMP into the city's general plan, or 3) enact an ordinance which requires that all applicable zoning, subdivision, conditional use permit, and variance decisions to be consistent with the applicable portions of the CHWMP. State law does not omit the city's authority to attach conditions to the issuance of a lend use aDDlication or to establish requirements or siting criteria different from those identified in the CHWMP. Any such conditions or criteria established by a city must be substantiated as necessary to protect the public health and safety sines the conditions or criteria may be appealed to the State Appeal Board (SB 477, Chapter 1167, Statutes of 1987). The CHWMP serves as the primary planning document for the management of hazardous waste in San Bernardino County. It is an element of the County's General Plan and is consistent with other elements of the General Plen. The CHWMP identifies the types and amounts of wastes generated in the County, establishes programs for managing these wastes, identifies an application review process for the siting of specified hazardous waste facilities, identifies mechanisms for reducing the amount of waste generated in the County, and identifies goals and policies and actions for • hazardous waste management. The CHWMP was prepared with full and meaningful involvement of the public. Information regarding the County's CHWMP Advisory Committee and public involvement efforts is presented in the discussion on public DarticiDation, Chapter 13. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS The County Dlan is intended to preserve the local land use process, protect the local environment, and provide a framework for ensuring [hat needed facilities arc sited. The following overall goals and policies/actions ere the underlying goals used to develop the CHWMP. Goals G-I-I To protect the health and welfare of the public, environment, and economy of San Bernardino County through a comprehensive program that ensures salt and responsible management of hazardous waste/material. G-44 To reduce the amount of hazardous waste generate^_ in the County by providing improved programs for hazardous waste source reduction and recycling. G-I-3 To ensure proper management of hazardous waste/material by identifying and encouraging safe end efficient methods for • ES-2 managing hazardous waste/material end by providing for needed hazardous waste facilities in San Bernardino County. G-1-4 To prevent hazardous waste from being permanently disposed into land, or emit4ed into the air without being processed by an economically and technically feasible alternative technology. G-1.5 To involve the Dublic, industry, and government in a comprehensive process [ha[ develops solutions for the management and disposal of hazardous waste. (i-I-6 To establish a framework for the development of San Bernardino County's share of hazardous waste facilities. G-1-7 To recognize that consumers contribute to the generation of hazardous waste, thus, limiting industrial growth is not an appropriate means of reducing [he County's commitment in hazardous waste management. G-1-8 To encourage and develop Dublic education programs on the proper management and disposal of hazardous waste. Policies/ Actions P/A-I-1 Because a need exists to augment current programs !or the proper management of hazardous waste and to address recent legislation, this jurisdiction shall work with industry and the • public in identifying safe and responsible solutions for the management and disposal of hazardous wastes. P/A-1-2 Because the CHWMP applies County-wide, the County and the Cit¢s Shall work [oge[ner eo Vre Vare auu upuaw ii,~ vi::.:r:i o well as its implementing ordinances end to develop and implement programs which reduce the amount and toxicity of the hazardous waste generated in the County. P/A-I-3 Because the Southern California Hazardous Waste Management Authority (Authority) provides an appropriate forum for local input regarding the regional siting oC hazardous waste facilities, this jurisdiction shall continue its particiDa[ion in the Authority. P/A-I-4 Because proDCr hazardous waste management is one of [he state's critical environmental concerns, the County and the cities shall work with the Authority end the state to address regional and statewide planning issues as necessary to achieve environmentally and economically effective hazardous waste i~~anagemen4 ca a local, regiaral, anC statewide basis. ES•3 CHAPTER 2 EXISTING PROGRAMS FOR DEALING WITH HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND HAZARDOUS WASTES The County has several departments involved in hazardous material/waste programs: the Environmental Health Services Department, the Fire Dcpartment, the Laod Management Department, the County Agricultural Commissioner, the Solid Waste Management Department, the Public Hcalth Department, the Sheriffs Office, and the District Attorney. OC these departments, the Environmental Health Services Dcpartment has responsibility for the majority of programs which deal with hazardous materiel and waste issues. The County Environmental Hcalth Services Dcpartment (DEHS) administers over eight programs related to hazardous waste and material management. Some of these programs include the generator permit program, the underground storage tank program, the hazardous materials handler program, the household hazardous wast< collection program, radiological health, water hygiene, and land use and noise control. in addition, the DEHS coordinates emergency response activities and, through its Air Pollution Control District, DEHS is responsible for regulating end monitoring [he air emissions from industry. n U Other agencies involved in hazardous materials and wastes management include: the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Publicly Owned Treatment Works. • ES-4 • • CHAPTER; WASTE GENERATION LEVELS, FACILITY INVENTORY, AND NEEDS ASSESSIv>ENT Comprehensive and accurate date on hazardous waste generation levels and management practices arc critical elements of a Hazardous Waste Management Plan. A clear understanding of current waste generation and management practices provides the basis for identifying program and facility needs. Comprehensive data provide a quantitative understanding of what types and amount of hazardous waste are generated; by whom; why; and how it is treated and/or disposed. Analysis of the data will identify opportunities for waste minimization, Knowledge of waste generation levels and management practices also serve as the basis for developing or fine tuning regulatory compliance Orograms, as well as educational and technical assistance programs. This information identifies areas to emphasize in the [raining of regulatory compliance inspectors and emergency responders. Finally, current and projected waste generation levels, when coupled with data regarding treatment capacity should identify facility needs. The primary source of the data presented in this chapter is the California Department of Health Services (DNS) Hazardous Waste Information System (HWIS). The HWIS tracks all manifested shipments of" hazardous wash in • California. The data regarding hazardous waste shipments into and out of San Bernardino County during 1986 and 1987 were provided to the County Department of Environmental Health Services (DENS) by the smtc. This data was analyzed and SuDPlemcntcd with information from DENS files, Biennial ReDOrts (as available), and telephone interviews with individual generators, era nsDOrtcrs and facilities (as necessary). nt Waste Generation Level The San Bernardino County hazardous waste generators ship about 65,000 tons of waste offsite (average of data for 1986 and 1987). The primary industries that contributed to this waste generation include the primary metal industries, utilities, and railroad trensDOrtation. These industries generate a variety of wastes including metal containing liquitls, waste oil, and 6aghouse wastes. The amount of wastes shipped offsite represent 5% of the total waste generated in the County. About 95% (or 1,2 million tons) of the wastes are managed onsite at the place where they are generated. The County has two commercial facilities currently in operation (Chemwest Industries and Broco. Incorporated). Based nn a comparison of the cnisiing capacity of these commercial facilities and the present required treatment capacity, the County has excess capacity in other recycling, but may need to have facilities for oil recovery, solvent recovery, incineration, and stabilization. Further reduction or recycling of these wastes is possible, which would lessen the demand for these facilities. ES-5 Projected Waste C_ntratioo Levels • About 67,000 tons of hazardous waste are anticipated to be managed offsite in the year 2000. Of this amount, waste oil, baghouse waste, and oily sludge arc the largest categories of waste. The industrial sourecs of this projected amount of waste are the same as current sources. The County will have a projected capacity deficiency for treatment and recycling facilities. Chemwest Industries, the existing recycling facility, has (fled for closure and, will not function as a commercial facility. Tht analysis of the data provides Considerable insight into hazardous waste management practices in San Bernardino County and provide [he basis for development of hazardous waste management policies in the remainder of this Plan. It is expected that an increasing amount of the hazardous waste now shipped offsite for treatment and/or disposal will in [he future be managed onsite. For example, one major generator of metal containing liquids has obtained regulatory approval for onsite recycling operations, thereby eliminating a significant waste stream. Although this [rend is anticipated, the projections provided do not include an estimate of the extent of change from offsite to onsiu management. While Chapter 5 establishes a framework for siting specified hazardous waste facilities, Clearly the data establish a need for eDplYing the siting criteria and land use review • procedures for onsite treatment and/or disposal facilities as well. This issue is addressed in Chapter B of this Plan, GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G•3-1 To establish a comprehensive and accurate data base to assist in Drogrzm development and to assess facility capacity needs. G-3-2 To ensure that the data base is maintained and updated regularly so that program planning is based on torrent information. Policies/Actions P/A-3-I Because current data collection and management practices do not allow easy compilation or interpretation, this jurisdiction shall develop a comprehensive automated waste tracking system that integrates data from all hazardous materials and hazardous waste Droerams. The system shall be based on geographical, physical and land use characteristics. P/A•3.2 Because DHS in their comments on the Draft Hazardous Waste Management Plan requires that the County identify deficiencies 1:5-6 • • and Drioritize the manner in which the County will address [hest deficiencies, this jurisdiction shall eddrtss the following deficiencies: 1. Perform s waste minimization assessment of all major hazardous waste producing industries end assist them in achieving maximum waste minimization as specified in Chapter 4; 2. Identify industries subject to prctrestment requirements and assist them in achieving compliance; 3. Include estimates of clean up wastes from Expenditure Plan sites as they become available. P/A-33 Because improved data would enable the County to develop stronger policy on hazardous waste management end because local concerns change, this jurisdiction shall update the data on an annual oasis end revise the CGUnty Haza: do^s wag. Management Plan at Icast once every three years. The background information and data shall be made accessible to other agencies and jurisdictions whenever Dossible. ES-7 CHAPTER 4 HASTE MINHsIIZA'I70N Waste minimization is an umbrella term that refers to sourec reduction and recycling. Source Reduction is defined as any process that reduces or eliminates the emoual of waste being generated; it usually includes processes within the manufacturing or oDCrating system of a business. Recycling refers to the use, reuse, or reclamation of a waste either onsi[e or offsite alter it is generated by a particular process. Waste minimization, as used by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), denotes the reduction, to the extent possible, of hazardous waste that is generated or subsequently treated, stored, or disposed. It includes source reduction or recycling efforts that: 1) reduce the total volume or quantity of hazardous waste, or 2) reduce the toxicity of hazardous waste, or both. Of the two approaches to waste minimization, sourec reduction is the preferred method of reducing wastes. Source reduction and recycling are identified as preferred waste reduction options under the EPA's use of the term waste minimization. Treatment technologies should be considered only after acceptable waste minimization methods have bccn identified. This priority for waste reduction differs from the State Department of Health Services (DHS) preferred options; the DHS includes treatment as a preferred waste reduction method. The DHS promotes the use of onsi[e treatment measures as a way of decreasing a county's overall need for offsite facilities. The EPA priority is used in this Plan because the County considers source reduction and recycling as the optimum methods for reducing wastes. c.,., w..en.ninn r`n.mrv nFHC hac had an informal waatt minimization program since 1983. The program has consisted of providing waste reduction and management information to generators through the County hazardous waste generator program, distribution of waste reduction information through a quarterly newsletter sent to all hazardous waste generators in the County, and co-sponsorship of a one-day waste reduction workshop with the University of California Riverside Extension Program. Recycling of waste is strongly encouraged through the existing program. Although present efforts to encourage and promote waste minimization have bccn successful, an expanded program is necessary to provide more comprehensive assistance to all industries, to document quantitatively the value of these waste minimization methods, to maintain personnel with expertise in waste minimization as a resource far industry, and [o ensure that local industry is taking full advantage of waste minimization oppnrtunitit5. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS In order to reduce the overall amount of waste generated in San Bernardino County, an expanded waste minimization program should be established. ES•8 • • The Collowiog goals an6 policies/actions set forth guidelines Cor the recommended waste minimization program for the County, Goals G•4-1 To minimize the generation of hazardous waste in San Bernardino County, to the extent possible. Policies f Actiona P/A-4-1 Because reducing the amount of waste generated io this County is an effective mechanism for reducing the potential impact of these waates to the Dublic health and safety and the environment, and because legislation encourages the reduction, to the extent feasible, of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall encourage and promote practices that will, in order of priority: I) reduce the use of hazardous materials and the generation of hazardous waste at their sourer, 2) recycle the remaining hazardous wastes for «use; and 3) treat those wastes which cannot be reduced at the source or recycled. Only residuals from waste recycling and treatment shall be land disposed. P/A•4-2 Because industry often lacks the technical information or in- house expertise to develop waste minimization programs, and additional resources are necessary at the local level to assist O industry in developing such programs, the County shall expand the waste minimization program to include education, technical assistance, economic incentives, and recognition elements. Fnneatinnal materials and technical assistance should be the first priority of the program. Such mtormation auu a»u:~;,C. are the cornerstone to industry participation in waste minimization efforts. Other measures, like economic incentives and recognition measures, should also be implemented, but these arc of a lower vriority. The program shall consist of, but not be limited to, the following components; EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE; - Develop an ezDanded educational program on waste minimization that includes: 1) brochures, publications, and posters to alert the public end industry on the importance oC wash minimization as well as describe appropriate reduction technologies and 2) audiovisual aids an waste minimization that can be [aken to bwinesses, trade associations and Dublic meetings. - Hold seminars and workshops for industry on waste ~~ minimization techniques and regulatory issues. Some of ES•9 these uminars or workshops could be co-sponsored with . local universities, Chambers of Commerco, or the DHS. Encourage trade associations and industry to form an industry task force to promote information ezchangc. Maintain library of technical reference materials and prepare a waste reduction resource directory. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE - Hire a waste minimization specialist to coordinate the program implementation and provide on-going assistance to generators on waste minimization techniques. - Provide training to hazardous waste generator inspectors on waste minimization techniques. The inspectors will incorporate waste minimization assessments into routine inspections and should be knowledgeable about the effectiveness of these techniques. - Provide waste audits on request and incorporate into routine inspections. ECONOMIC INCENTIVES Provide information on availability of pooled loan fund • and state grants for developing innovative technology Reduce permit fees for firms that achieve waste minimization. RECOGNITION OF OUTSTANDING PROGRAMS Develop a method for recognizing firms that have achieved notable success in reducing hazardous waste. Also, the program shall assist industry in preparing state and federal waste minimization reports. A coDY of the report shall be submitted to the County DEHS a[ [he time of permit renewal so that an annual report can be developed [o measure the progress of waste minimization efforts. The annual waste minimization report prepared by DEHS shall identify activities undertaken by the department and provide some indication of the amount o! hazardous wastes reduced as a result of local efforts. FjA-3-3 Because having the County wnduci a waste minimization audit is a voluntary action by u business and those businesses that participate may not be in full compliance with regulatory requirements, the County shall address violations as specified in state law. The Cnunty shall develop in conjunction with the District Attorney policies for deciding on such violations • ES-10 . pursuant to the requirements ut forth in Section 25552 of the California Nealth and Safety Code. The policies developed to address such violations shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1) Whether the action is a knowing, willful, negligent, or inadvertent violation; 2) Whether the violator agrees to the schedule of compliance specified 6y the County; and 3) Whether the violatioe was discovered during an onsite consultation carried out Dursuant to this chapter. In addition, the County may take enforcement action, or refer the violation for enforcement action, in accordance with sta[c Iaw. C~ ES-I 1 CHAPTER 5 SITING OF SPECIFIED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES Development of specified hazardous waste facilities rcquirts permits from state and local agencies. The State Department of Htalth Services is responsible for issuing hazardous waste facility ptrmits and for ensuring that operating conditions imposed on the approval of a facility are met. It is the responsibility of local governments, however, to set that a facility is sited in areas with Compatible land uses, to ensure that conditions of approval on land use permits are implcmcnttd and carried out for the duration of the project and to respond to hazardous material/waste emergencies. At [he local level, both discretionary and ministerial land use permits would be required. Local land use authority is derived from politt powers which were reserved to [he states by the Ftderal Constitution and delegated to cities and counties in California by Article XI, Section 7 of the S[etc Constitution. Outline of the Local Aooliwtiao Review Process The types of applications required for local evaluation of a spcci(ied hazardous waste facility are listed below. The required local land use ptrmits include: Application to AppIY the Zoning Overlay of 'Specified Hazardous • Waste Facility" to the project site and respective buffer (set Policy P/A•5•A). Site approval application (Conditional Vse Permits) , Special Use Permit (issued by the County Environmental Health Services Director, required as a condition of approval on the discretionary Dermi[) Ministerial Permits from Building, Grading, Flood Control, etc A Sitc Approval (Conditional Usc Permit), or applicable city application, is necessary to site specified hazardous waste facilities in San Bernardino County. Alang with the Conditional Use Permit application, an application to apply [he specified hazardous waste facility zoning overlay is required for all proposed specified hazardous waste facilities, The overlay applies to the project site and associated bu(fcr. Requiring the overlay restricts future development to uses that are compatible with specified hazardous waste facilities. The County of San Bernardino Land Management Department, Offict of Planning, or applicable City department would process tht land use application. Usher departments, such as the The County oC San Bernardino refers to its discretionary land use application es a "Site Approval", It is equivalent to a Conditional Use Permit Application. • ES-12 • Environmental Health Services Department, will have a significant role in reviewing and commenting on an application. The following information outlines the local application review process for evaluating a specified hazardous waste facility proposal. The requirements added by state law are included in [hc information below. Refer to Figure 5-1 for an illustration of the items mentioned. The Figure includes a description of the start process for informational purposes since it may be a concurrent process. a) At least 90 days prior to the submittal of a formal application the applicant must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the Office of Permit Assistance (in tht State Office of Planning sod Research) and with the applicable city or County jurisdiction. The NOI provides a complete description oC the nature and scope of the project. The local agency notifies the public about the proposed project by publishing notices in a newspaper of general circulation, posting notices in the location where the Drojcet is proposed, and mailing notices to owners of property contiguous with the proposed project site. b) Subsequent to the NOI the Office of Permit Assistance convenes a public meeting in the affected city or County to inform the public on the nature and scope of the proDOSCd project. The meeting also considers [he DfOCedarea nCCEaaary for rCVICW Of 8 9DCCIfICd haZardgaa waste facility application. • c) Within 90 days after receiving the NOI the local agency appoints a seven member Local Assessment Committee. The Committee meets with the applicant to determine the terms and conditions for project approval. The negotiations must focus on the protection of the ....61:n Fin IrF n_.. d_ e_n_fw_r_.. nnA rAn n ~ •nl ,vrll ae 1hn fiaral ..-_.... ...._ ... .m mnnm ae welfare through special benefits and compensation. The composition of the Committee consists of three representatives of the community at large, two «Dresentatives of environmental or Dubl is interest groups, and two representatives of affected businesses and industries. d) The applicant participates in a pre-application meeting which is se[ up with the local government agency (as required by the Health and Safety Code, Section 25199.7 (e)). This conference provides an opportunity for the County and any applicable department to advise the applicant on project consistency with the General Plan and CHWMP before a formal application is submitted as well as to respond to questions regarding the permit process. Most cities have a similar procedure. c) Funnel applications may 6e submitted to a city or the County once these initial steps have been undertaken. Both the Site Approval Application (Conditional Use Permit Applicatioq) and the specified hazardous waste facility zoning overlay application are required. State law requires the pcrmitling agency to decide on the completeness of the application and to notify the applicant regarding ES-13 eomplctcness within 30 days from [he date the applications were • submitted. f) Within 10 days from the date the applicatiop was deemed complete, and within 60 days Crom the notice of aDDlication completeness, the Office of Permit Assistance holds a Dost-aDDlication meeting among the lead and responsible agencies, the applicant, the Local Assessment Committee, and the public. The purpose of the meeting is [o determine the issue3 of concern to the public and the permitting agencies. Once these issues have been heard the applicant and [hc Local Assessment Committee meet regarding the terms and conditions aecepta6le to the community. The Act includes a provision for the Local Assessment Committee (LAC) to hire a consultant to review the project. The eDDlicant would Day a tee established by the local agency. In addition, if differences between the LAC and the applicant cannot be resolved, the OPA may recommend the use oC a mediator, The applicant would pay half the cos[ for mediation. g) Whcn the aDDlication has been found complete by the permitting agency, an initial study of the project will be made to identify the significant impacts on the environment. If one or more significant impacts are identified then an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is prepared. If no significant impacts are found or if the significant impacts can be mitigated, a Negative Declaration will be prepared. When preparing an EIR the lead agency is required [o send out a notice to all eDDlicable agencies regarding the preparation of the EIR. A scoping hearing can be performed by the lead agency to • obtain public in-ut. After a Draft EIR has been released the public and responsible agencies have 45 days in which to Comment on the adequacy of the Draft. The Draft is considered by the Environmental Review Committee in a public meeting. The environmental document is ecrtificd by the decision-making body (in this case the Board of Supervisors) when a decision is made on a project. Refer to P/A-S- 4 for the issues that will be evaluated as part of the environmental analysis. h) A noticed public hearing is then scheduled 6cforc the Planning Commission for consideration of the site approval (Conditional Use Permit) and aDDlication of the zoning overlay. A staff report is prepared by the lead agency which describes the project, any issues of concern, end a recommendation for approval or denial of the land use aDDlicatiens. The Local Assessment Committee also prepares a report that is submitted to both the Planning Commission end the Board of Supervisors or the City Council, It includes the Committee's recommendations for approval or denial of the project and any terms and conditions which have been negotiated. The Planning Commission forwards tts recommendations to [he Board of Supervisors or City Council. A decision on the application is made by the Board of Supervisors or City Council, at a noticed public hearing. Any interested person or the eDDlicant may file an appeal on the aDDroval of the project or the conditions of aDDroval with the State Appeal ES-14 • Y ~.~. G 3 ~ T U V 9 j 60 u fi M C o _ _~~ 0 E c E T v' t~ 553JOad 31V.LS V 6 R6 a C '> Y N T D u 7 E e 0 V O VC y> 5 O .5 N N {y ss3JOaa wJO~ Hoard, within 30 days of that decision. A decision on the appeal will be based on consistency with an adopted, approved CHWMP. i) A Special Use Permit is issued as a condition of approval on the Site Approval (Conditional Use Permit). The purpose of this permit is to ensure that conditions of approval are carried out. j} If no appeals are filed on the land use applications, ministerial permits may be issued. These permits may include permits from building and safety, grading, environmental health, flood control, etc. Siting Criteria State law requires the CHWMP to include siting criteria and designate general areas where the criteria might aDDiY• Siting criteria set forth a Structure far evaluating proposals (or specified hazardous waste facilities and serve to focus the evaluation of facility proposals on critical issues. Siting criteria represent a uniform set of standards applied to all applications, yet they are designed with some flexibility depending on the type of facility and the proposed site location, Siting criteria are used for evaluating a project at a particular site. When used along with general plan policies, the siting criteria determine thr suitability o(a site for a specified hazardous waste facility proposal. The use of the siting criteria end General Plan policies arc part of the full application review and environmental analysis required oC all applications for specified hazardous waste facilities under state law. The complete siting criteria follow the policies/actions of this chapter. • GOALS AND POLICtFS/ACTIONS The following goals, policies, and actions shall be implemented m rn~n.r mat spentted hazardous waste facilities are reviewed according [o the procedures identified in state law and sited in the most environmentally preferred locations. Two terms are used to identify [he implementing agency. The term "this jurisdiction" refers to the applicable city or county. Where County and "this jurisdiction" are used, the policy applies to both the County of San Bernardino and the applicable governmental body. Goals G-5-1 To establish an effective and expeditious application review process for siting specified hazardous waste facilities that includes extensive public participation. G-5Q To apply a uniform set of criteria to the siting of spec':Cied hazardow waste facilities in the County for the protection of the public health and safety and the environment. G-5-3 To ensure coordination among agencies and County departments in the review of all specified hazardous waste facility applications within the County. • ES-16 • G-5-4 To protect vital groundwater resources for Drescnt and future beneficial uses. Policies and Actiooa P/A-5.1 Because specified hazardous waste facilities shall only 6e sited in areas where land uses have bccn deemed compatible with such facilities by the local jurisdiction, an applicant for a sDCCified hazardous waste facility must apply for a Sitc Approval ( Conditional Use Permit) and a zoning amendment. The zoning amendment applies the SDCCified Hazardous Waste Facility overlay (as defined io P/A-S•4) to the project site and buffer area. The applicant shall meet all provisioos oC the specified hazardous waste facility overlay district (see Policy P/A-5-4) as well a5 other general Dlan and ordinance provisions. P/A-5.2 Because the evaluation of a project application is a costly and time consuming effort and the public involvement demands a large expense: A) The applicant shell fund the public notification efforts including public hearing notices [o residents and property owners within 3000 feet of the Droposed project boundary, legal and display advertisements in local newspapers and a DaDer of general • circulation, and a sign (24 sq. ft.) to be displayed on or near the project site (pursuant to the Government Code, Section 63090). B) The applicant shell fund activities relating to the review and evalOallUn of a aDGNficu im~a~uom •u.., of uyp~.CSt:L~'q ~ to assist the Local including staff time, consultants hired Assessment Committee with application review, review by any aDDlicable city, and Dre-aDpl~eation assessments. (Government Code Section 65941.5 and the Health and Safety policies/ Code, Section 25199.7) Act on• Rcaoired of this Jurisdiction P/A-5-3 Because the County recognizes it's resDOnsibility for siting needed specified hazardous waste facilities Droposed in environmentally sound locations, this County will consider aDDlications for specified hazardous waste facilities. Proposals to site such facilities in the County must include aDDlications Co: a Site Approval (Condttional Use Permit) and ter a sMCifird Hazardous Waste Facility overlay (see P/A•5.4), A decision on the aDDlications will be based on making the following findings: a. The proposed project is consistent with the provisions of the General Plan, Development Code (zoning ordinance), ES-17 the CHWMP including the Siting criteria, and [he public • resources code (Section 21000, et. seq.). b. The facility location and/or design adequately protect public health, safety, and the environment. c. The project is proposed in sn area where present and future surrounding uses ¢re compatible with the sDCCi(icd hazardous waste facility. P/A-5-4 Because local land use plans and zoning ordinances are required by state law to specifically address the permitting of specified hazardous waste facilities and such Dlaas and ordinances do not address requirements for these facilities, end because aDDlicants for specified hazardous waste facilities are required to apply for a project-specific request to include the hazardous waste facility overlay on the project site and buffer zone and existing ordinances do not define or specify the requirements of such an overlay, this jurisdiction shall amend the Development Code (or ZOOIng ~rdinanCe) tD require nll specified hazardous waste facilities to 6e permitted only with an approved Site Approval (Conditional Use Permit) io eras with a zoning overlay of Specified Hazardous Waste Facility. The overlay shell be applicable to all specified hazardous waste facility epDlications. The purpose of the overlay is to ensure that facilities arc sited in areas that protect public health, • safety, welfare, and the environment; to assign the specified Hazardous Waste Facility overlay to the project site and buffer so that incompatible uses cannot be permitted in the future; to identify permitted uses of the overlay; end to outline the perm[[ rovscw proccqums. tno ucvtaopmcnt Utsdc (or zootog ordinance) shall define the Specified Harardous Waste Facility overlay as cootaieing the following; A requirement that specified hazardous waste facilities may locate io certain land use districts (or zone) with ao approved Sites Approval (Conditional Uu Permit) and Specified Hazardous Waste Facility Overlay. Land disposal facilities and incineration facilities shell locate in Resource Conservation Districts (or zone) and other areas with a population of less than 20 people Dcr square mile with an approved Specified Hazardous Waste Facility Overlay. Treatment, incineration, recycling, storage; and transfer facilities should locate in Regional Industrial districts (heavy industrial zone or equivalent) with an approved Specified hazardous Waste Facility Overlay. Incineration facilities shall not, however, be located in areas where emissions from the facility could directly impact food crops or livestock. (See discussion in Section 5.3.1 of this chapter.) ES- I B • . 2. The siting criteria Dreunted in this chapter (starting on pge 5-2E). The criteria shall be adopted as development standards that shall be met along with other policies of the General Plan and Provisions of the Development Code (zoaigg ordinaece) before • facility is approved. Compliance with the siting criteria shall be evaluated as part oC the environmental analysis. 3. The aDPlicatioa procednra ut oat in AB 2948 (CAaptcr 1504, Statutes of 1986) for the review of specified hazardous waste facility applications. 4. A regvircmevt that all specified hazardous waste facility applications are subject to a Special Uu Permit The purpose of the Special Usc Permit shall be to evaluate the operation and monitoring plan of the facility, to ensure the facility has adequate measures for monitoring on-going impacts to air quality, groundwater, and environmentally sensitive resources, to evaluate the types and quantities of wastes that will be treated or disposed of at the facility, and to require periodic inspections of the facility to ensure conditions of approval are carried out. 5. A requirement that all specified haardovs waste facility applications include information about the project proponent's past buaineu practices. • 6. Diuretionary aDPlicatioa review rcgairemevts to ensure developers are awue of the different studies that will be required iv the eovirogmental analysis when assessing the merit of facility aDPlications. A reporting and monitoring G,c6; c-; _.,n t,. adnnted to mitigate or avoid significant environmental impacts as required by All llau tCha D,m 1232, Statutes of 1988). The different issues that must be studied consist of, but are not limited to, the following: a) An analysis oC the project's potential impact to surface and groundwater resources es well as public water supplies. The study shall identify monitoring and mitigation measures that ensure protection of vital surface and groundwater resources !or the life of the project. b) An evaluation oC the project's impact to air quality and the consistency of the project with air quality regulations end the local air quality plans. The evaluation must consider toxic air contaminants, wind patterns, and an assessment of the project'; impact to PSD and nomattaiument areas. c) An analysis of potential mineral deposits through a site characterization study. ES-19 d) A review of the adequacy and capacity of the proposed transportation routes including an • identification of highway accident rates. (Refer to Chapter 10, P/A-10.3, for other issues to address in the study.) e) An assessment of risk on the populatiop that evaluates the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific types of wastes which will be handled, the design features of the facility, en evaluation of poteetial air emissions Crom proposed facility, and any Deed for buffers from residences, immobile populations, and environmentally sensitive resources. f) If a facility proposes to handle acutely hazardous waste, an analyais of the maximum credible accident may be necessary pursuant to AB 3777 (Chapter 1260, Statutes of 1986). The study shall take into consideration the quantity and types of wastes that could be received at the facility, the design features, and the planned operational practices at the facility. Based on the above items, the study shall provide en estimate of [he distance over which any effects would carry, options for reducing the risk, and procedures for dealing with the effects, including recommendations for an appropriate buffer distance. g) An evaluation of the project's impact to the • socioeconomic characteristics of [he affected jurisdiction and an assessment of the economic viability of the project. h) An evaluation of cultural, archaeological, end paleontological resources on [he project site and surrounding buffer. P/A-5-5 Because several agencies (i.e. Air Quality agencies, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Department of Health Services) and local governments (County, cities and Special Districts) will be involved in the permitting of sDCCified hazardous waste facilities, this jurisdiction shall request all applicable agencies and local government departments to participate in a meeting of a specified hazardous waste facility application at the Dre- application stage (as required by Health end Safety Code, Section 25199.7 (e)). The purpose of the meeting is to discuss and document issues of concern to all appropriate agencies as wcl! ss sDClsstion review requirements snd time trams. This jurisdiction will assist the applicant in developing a matrix of all reviewing agencies end agency requirements before a formal application is accepted. ES•20 • • P/A-S-ti Because specified hazardous waste facilities have a potential for adverse impacts on the environment, all applications shall comply with the policies of the CHWMP and the siting criteria and shall be the subject of environmental analysis. The environmental analysis shall be done as a consolidated effort among applicable County Departments. Compliance with the siting criteria shall be evaluated in the environmental analysis. P/A-5.7 Because this jurisdiction Deeds to ensure that wastewater is appropriately discharged, this jurisdiction shall require specified hazardous waste facilities generating treated wastewater to discharge to the Santa Ane Interceptor (SARI line), to [he Chino Nonrcclaimable Waste Line (Brine Line), or any future industrial waste line or an approved new tcchoology that treats or eliminates the discharge. Wastewater shall meet all applicable agency requirements for discharge to these waste lines. P/A-5-8 Because a Significant portion of County land falls under federal jurisdiction, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service, and the DeDartmcnt of Defense (DOD), and the policies of DOD exclude the development of specified hazardous waste facilities, and because Indian lands comprise another significant component and Native American Tribal Councils have expressed concern over the development of specified hazardous waste facilities in the County, the County shall take the following actions' • A. Complete a Memorandum of Understanding with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding review of specified hazardous waste applications for those projects proposed on land owned by the BLM; H. Notify and request involvement of Native American Tribal Councils in the review of ell specified hazardous waste facility applications in their region; and C. Prohibit specified hazardous waste facilities on private lands in the Death Valley and Joshua Tree National Monuments, Mitchell Caverns State Park, National Forest Lands administered by the U.S. Forest Service, the East Mojave National Scenic Area, end any Wilderness Area designated by the U.S. DeDartmcnt of Agriculture, or wilderness study area designated by BLM as suitabic for a Wilderness Area pursuant Vi the Federal Lend Management Policy Act of 1976. When Congress acts on Wilderness Areas this policy shall be amended to be consistent with those Wilderness Areas. P/A-5.9 Because state law authorizes a tax (not exceeding 1096 of gross receipts) on an approved specified hazardous waste facility, and these facilities have a potential to impact the environment, public health, end public services, this jurisdiction shall set ES-21 aside a portion Of the revenue for programs that encourage • safe and respoosiblc management of hazardous waste. P/A-5-10 Because the siting criteria and the politics of this Dlan should be applied uniformly throughout the County in order to ensure that effective management of hazardous waste and that facilities are sited only in environmentally sound locations, the County shall encourage all the cities within the County to adopt the CHWMP and the siting criteria and develoDmeot politics. P/A-5-11 Because specified hazardous waste facility proposals could impact proposed city or County redevelopment projects, this jurisdiction shall inform the applicable redevelopment agency of all specified hazardous waste facility applications. P/A•5.12 Because the CHWMP sets forth comprehensive criteria for siting needed specified hazardous waste facilities, the siting criteria should be used to determine 4he suitability of projects in all County, city, state, and federal lands. P/A-5-13 Because [he Department of Defense (DOD) contributes significantly to hazardous waste production in the County as a result of site remediation efforts, DOD operations, and businesses producing products for DOD, this Dlan encourages the following: A) That the DOD implement waste reduction efforts to the • maximum extent possible. B) That the DOD obtain appropriate permits from local jurisdictions and allow periodic inspection of facilities for compliance with environmental regulations. C) That the DOD consider undertaking land exchange er lease agreements with industry desiring to site spccified hazardous waste facilities in DOD property. D) That the DOD undertake hazardous waste management efforts which are consistent with the goals ^.nd policies/actions of this Plan. P/A-5-14 Because cement kilns can use certain hazardous wastes as a secondary full and the use of such fuel significantly reduces large amounts of waste and may result in improved air emissions, [his jurisdiction shall encourage facilities in San Bernardino County with cement kilns to use certain hazardous wastes as alternative sources of energy, only where improvements in air emissions ten be achieved. P!A-S-IS Bccausc Section 65300 of the California Government Code places a dual mandate on how cities and counties must consider develoDmeot within a sphere of influence, the County shall ensure that all applications for spccified hazardous waste facilities are reviewed for consistency with the goals and • ES•22 • policies of the 1989 County General Plan regarding development in a sphere of influence (LU-8 and LU-9). P/A-5.16 Because TTU's have the potential to impact public health and safety and the environment, this jurisdiction shell apply the siting procedures to TTU's on a case-by-case basis. Case by cox determination shall be based on the characteristics of the propoxd project site, including its proximity to residential and/or immobile populations, length of operation in any given area, the amount and type of hazardous waste to be treated, the proposed method of treatment, and the equipment and :and area necessary to operate the TTU, In order to exempt a TTU from compliance with the siting criteria and zoping overlay requirement of policy P/A-5-4, a demonstration must bt made that the TTU falls under an existing land use permit for an existing business or facility, oq the TTU is a minor, temporary use apDrovablc by a ministerial action. The determination of applicability shall be made by the directors of the city or County Planning Department end the County Environmental Health Services department with input from other aDDlicable departments. If resolution of the applicability of [he ailing criteria or policy P/A-5.4 cannot be reached, the decision shall be made by the city or County Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. • P/A-5-17 Because San Bernardino County obtains about 85°b of its drinking water from groundwater and a significant percentage of the population of Southern California also depends on San Bernardino County groundwater for its beneficial uses, and because inappropriately sittd development (including specified i,aearduus wasrc iacitities) Haut the potential to adversely impact groundwater, this jurisdiction shall develop a Countywide groundwater protection strategy. The strategy should consider specific policies and programs for regulation of Dntential sources of pollution as well as identify mechanisms to detect and correct possible impacts to the groundwater. ES•23 SI77NG CRITERIA FOR • SPECIFIED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES (Refer to Policip P/MS-~ AND P/A-3-6) PROTECT THE RESIDENTS OF SAN BERNARpQ40 COUNTY PROXIIvIITY TO RESIDENCES A 2000 foot buffer zone from residences shall be required for any land disposal facility unless the owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the County or city end the State Department of Health Services [het n buffer zone of less than 2000 feet is adequate for the protection of Dublic health and safety. To determine the appropriate buffer a risk assessment shall be required whiuh ronsiders the phYSical and chemical characteristics of the specific type of wastes that will be handled, the design features of the facility, and any need for buffering residential areas or other sensitive areas from potential accidents or adverse emissions from a proposed facility. b. A risk assessment shall be required for any treatment. recvclina. storage. and transfer facilities. The risk assessment should consider the DhYsical and chemical characteristics of the specific type of wastes that will be handled, the tlesign of the • facility, and any need for buffering residential areas or other sensitive areas from Dotential accidents or adverse emissions Crom a proposed facility. 2. PROXIMITY TO IMMOBILE POPULATIONS Specified hazardous waste facilities shell be sited so that no significant risk is Dresented to the immobile Dopulation. An adequate buffer between the hazardous waste facility and the immobile population shall be established by a risk assessment. The risk assessment shall consider the physical and chemical characteristics of the specific types of wastes which will be handled and the design features of the facility and proximity to immobile populations. Immobile populations include schools, hospitals, convalescent homes, prison facilities, facilities for the mentally ill, etc, 3. PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC FACILITIES Soccif ied hazardous waste facilities should be sited in such a manner as they do not adversely impact the public health end safety of large numbers of people in Dublic areas or people in Dublic facilities. An adequate buffer shall be determined by a risk assessment. ES-24 • 4. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES • Sptcified hazardous waste facilities should be located in arcas where emergency response capabilities and public water and sewer services are available. When facilities are located io desert or rural areas where public services are not readily available, Drivately-owned onsite water, sewer, an6 emergency services (self-sufficient services) may be used. 5. FLOOD PLAIN AREAS a. Lend disposal facilities may not be located in arcas subject to 100-year events eve° with protection (CFR, Title 40, Section 264.18 (b) and CCR Title 22, see Section 66391 (a)(11)(b)). Flood plain areas include areas subject to flooding by dam or levee failure and natural causes such as river flooding, rainfall or snowmclt, Tsunamis, scichcs and coastal flooding. b. Treatment. recvclina. storaae. and transfer facilities may be located in areas subject to 100-year flooding if designed, constructed, operated, end maintained to Drevent failure due to such events. Flood plain areas include areas subject to flooding by dam or levee failure and natural causes such as river flooding, • rainfall or snowmclt, tsunamis, scichcs and coastal flooding. 6. PROXIMITY TO ACTIVE OR RECENTLY ACTIVE FAULTS No specified hazardous waste facility should be Dlaced within 200 feet of a arrive n •nHv arrivr fvJr /f alifnrnia f•nAr of Rronla rinne (CCR), Title 22, Section 66391 (a) (11) A (1) and (2). y 7. UNSTABLE SOILS a. Land disposal facilities shall not be located in areas of potential rapid geologic change (Title 23, Subchapter I5, Section 2531 (e) of the CCR). b. Treatment. recvclina. storaae. and transfer facilities may be located in areas of potential rapid geologic change if designed, constructed, maintained, anA operated to prevent failure as e result of such changes (Title 23, Subchapter I5, Section 2531 (e) of the CCR). ES-25 PROTECT' C.ROLrNDWATER QUALITY S b. DEITH TO GROUNDWATER a. 1 artd diaoosal fecilitie. shall be located where natural geologic features provide a natural barrio that prevents coatamination of vital groundwater resources by waste and leschate (Title 23, Subchapter I5, Section 2531 (a) of the CCR) and which meet the siting requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board. b. Tr atm nt r v lino torso and Iran=f r Ca iliti ~ shall be located where natural geologic features prevent the contamination of groundwater unless ehe engineering design and construction of the facility and containment structures arc capable of preventing significant adverse impacts to groundwater. 9. MAJOR RECHARGE AREAS FOR AQUIFERS a. Land disoosal facilities should be prohibited within any area known or susDeceed to be eup0lying principal recharge to a regional aquifer as defined in state, regional, or general plans. The County General Plan and Bulletin N116, 1975, of the California Department of Water Resources identify the following as regional aquifers: Ames Valley (7-16) • Antelope Vailcy (6-44) Bear Valley (8.9) Bessemer Valley (7-I S) Ria Mradnws Valley (8-7) Caves Canyon Valley (6-36) Copper Mountain Valley (7-11) Dale Valley (7-9) Deadman Valley (7-13 EI Mirage Vailcy (6-43) Harper Valicy (6-47) Hclcndale Fault Valley (7.48) Iron Ridge Area (7-50) Johnson Valicy (7-IS) Kane Wash Area (6-89) Lavie Valley (7.14) Lost Horse Valley (7-51) Lower Mojave River Valley (6.40) Lucerne Valley (7-19) Mesns Yslley {7-17) Middle Mojave River Valley (b-41) Morongo Valley (7-20) Needles Veliey (7-44) Pipes Canyon Fault Valley (7-49) Seven Oaks Valley (8.8) Troy Valley (6-39) • ES•26 • TwentYniae Palm Valley (7-10) Upper Mojave River Valley (6.42) Warren Valley (7-12) Upper S¢ata Ana Valley (8.2) b. Treatment. recvelina. storaee end tren~fe facilitie may be located in priaeipal recharge areas if facilities ere designed, eonstracted, maipteiped, and operated to prevent accidental releases. 10. PERMEABILITY OF SURFICIAL MATERIALS a. Land disposal facilitie• shall be located in areas where underlying geology provides impermeability meeting [he « quirements of the SWRCB (pursuant to Title 23, Subchapter 15, Section 2531 (b) (1) of the California Code of Regulations). b. Treatment- recvcline. storaec end t ansfe f cil't'ee may be sited in areas where soils arc Dcrmeabls if adequate engineered features such as spill containment, monitoring, and inspection measures are included in the DroJect design and construction. 1 I. NON-ATTAINMENT AIR AREAS • Specified hazardous waste facilities may be located in non-attainment areas if the facilities meet the plans and regulations of the air quality agency of each district. ,... ..L:ii.i:Tu :i. ini7niiTiui: ue J:VI'Iirrl.Arvi DETERIORATION (PSD) AREAS Specified hazardous waste facilities may be located in PSD areas if facilities meet the plans and regulations of the air quality agency of each district. These facilities, however, may no[ located near or within national parks, wilderness and memorial areas, and other similarly dedicated areas, es specified in the Clean Air Act, 13. WETLANDS Specified hazardour waste facilities shall be prohibited from impairing the amiability of wctlsnds such ss saltwat:r, fr-sh ware:, and brackish marshes, swamps, and bogs inundated by surface or groundwater with a frequency to support, under normal circumstances, prevalence of vegetative or aquatic life which requires saturated soil conditions for growth end reproduction, as defined in general, regional, start, and ES-27 federal plans. A protective buffer zone shall be established based • on a biological resource study and risk assessment. 14. HABITATS OF THREATENED, RARE, OR ENDANGERED SPECIES Specified hazardous waste facilities shall be prohibited from impairing the viability of habitats of threatened, rare, or endangered species as defined io general, regional, state, and federal plans. A protective buffer zone shall be established based on a biological resource study and risk assessment. I5. PRIME AGRICULTURAL LANDS Soccificd hazardous waste facilities may pot be sited on prime agricultural lands as defined in California law and adopted local land use plans unless an overriding public need is served. When siting hazardous waste management facilities is these areas, overriding public service needs must be demonstrated. 16. RECREATIONAL, CULTURAL, OR AESTHETIC RESOURCES Specified hazardous waste facilities shall not be located in recreational, cultural, or aesthetic resource areas except low volume transfer and storage facilities which are necessary to handle hazardous waste generated by visitors, workers, or residents in these areas. Recreational, cultural, and aesthetic resource areas include public • and/or private lands having local, regional, state, or national significance, value or importance such as: national, state, regional county end local Darks and recreation areas; historic resources; wild and scenic rivers; scenic highways; ecological preserves; public and ' private preservation areas; and other lands of local, regional, start, or national significance. 17. AREAS OF POTENTIAL MINERAL DEPOSITS Soccificd hazardous waste facilities should not be located so as to preclude extraction of minerals neecssary to sustain the economy of the State. I8. MILITARY LANDS Public specified hazardous waste facilities shall not be sited on military lands pursuanr ro DOD policy. ES-28 • ~ICrr7cE CAFE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WACTE • 19. PROXIMITY TO AREAS OF HASTE GENERATION a. Land disposal facilities may be located more distant from waste generation sources than other facilities because of their requirement for larger laod and buffer areas. b. Treatment recvelina. ato ane. and transfer facilities shall be close t0 hazardous waste generation sources to minimize the risks of transportation. 20. PROXIMITY TO MAIOR TRANSPORTATION ROUTES Specified hazardous waste facilities shall have good access to and from major tramportation routes (state or interstate divided highways). 21. MINIMIZE TRANSPORT THROUGH MINOR ROUTES Cpec'fied hazardous waste facilities should be sited so that road networks leading to major trsnsDOrtation routes do not pass through residential neighborhoods, Should minimize residential frontages, and should be demonstrated to be safe with regard to road design and construction, accident rates, excessive traffic, etc. 22 LOCATIONAL RESTRICTIONS DUE TO TRANSPORTATION . ROUTES a. Soeeified Hazardous waste Cacili[ies shall not be located where highways 58, 62, and 71 are used as major transportation routes unless a study of transDOrlation routes es specified in P/A-10-3 IU1.1~• 1N Ilaa u e ~~ ..~ • uY~u ~.• .,. make the particular route suitable for its use as a major route. b. I.ow volume transfer and storage facilities may be located in these areas if accessary to manage the hazardous wastes from [hat area. ESd9 CHAPTER6 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR HANDLING AND STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS State and federal governments have established Drogrems which require businesses that handle hazardous substanecs to prepare an inventory of the hazardous substances stored sod to Drovide that list to a local agency dcsigoated to administer the program. The purpose of these disclosure laws is to have information available to first responders in the event of an emergency at the site and [o Drovide information [o local residents regarding the kinds and amounts of chemicals stored in their communities. The legislation did not include standards for above ground storage oC hazardous substances as part of its mandate. Assembly Bill 2185 (Chapter 1167, Statutes of 1986) mandates that all businesses handling hazardous substances provide to the local administering agency an inventory and location of hazardous substanecs stored on the proDer[y. This law applies to all businesses which handle at any one time more than 500 pounds, 55 gallons, or 200 cubic feet (conspresscd gas) of a hazardous material. The Department of Environmental Health Services (DEHS) has been designated the administering agency for DurDOSes of the AB 2185 Drogram for the County of San Bernardino, including the incorporated cities (California Hca!!h and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.95). This chapter supports existing efforts in the underground tank program • and recommends a continued effort in the maintenance of underground tank records and an annual reDOrt on this Drogram. Above ground storage requirements are recommended for inclusion in County implementing V~YIIIY IIYI-i. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G•6-I To reduce the risks posed by the storage of hazardous substances in above ground tanks and containers. G-6-2 To minimize [he threat of contamination of groundwater from leaking underground storage tanks containing hazardous materials. G-6-3 To minimize the threat [o residential areas from the use of hazardous materials. Po@cits; Actions P/A-6-1 Because some waste reduction technologies significantly reduce or eliminate the amount of hazardous waste generated since they arc a part of the manufacturing process, and because the equipment for these technologies can malfunction causing [he ES-30 • • potential for a hazardous substance release, the Caunty shall amend Uniform Environmental Codt to require atl hazardous waste generators aad hazardous material handlers ro report any such equipment malrunction or upset which may cause hazardous waste to be generated. P/A-6-2 Because above ground storage of hazardous materials may pose a threat to public health aad safely and the environment and County ordinances do not include standards for above ground storage, and 6ecauu all hazardous material handlers may not be easily identified, the County shell do the following: A. Reviu Division 3 of the Uniform Environmental Health Code to establish about ground storage standards Cor hazardous materials. The ordinance shall include, but not be limited to, the following requirements: - secondary containment oC substances; segregation of ineomDatible materials; - storage of hazardous substances restricted to an area with a surface imDtrvious to the substanct; - methods to prevent runmf( oC rain water and/or collection of rain water if area is not covered; - Cencing and/or other security of the area with adequate signs present to inform of the presence of hazardous materials; • - emergency equipment to be stored onsite as sDProDriatc (e6• DroDer absorbent to dent with a spill or an aDProDriatt neutralizing agent); and - minimum storage distances from adjacent land uses. n Establish a system for identifying all handlers of hazardous substances wish ao.: Te°=ores as: - review o[ telephone directories and other business listings; - exchange of information with city code enforcement officers, local fire agencies, and city business license offices; and - field surveys as necessary. C. Review periodically each Diace of business registered in the hazardous material handler program to verify the hazardous substance inventory on file and to advise the handler of raft storage practices. P/A-6-3 Because leaking underground storage tanks threaten groundwater resources. the County shall do the following; A. Amend the underground storage tank ordinance to maintain its consistency with state and federal requirements. ES-71 B. Continue to enforce the Uniform Environmental Health • Code by such measures as plan review and inspection of new tsnk installations, inspection of existing tanks at least once every three years, and inspection at all tank removals. C. Maintain records of tank Derformantt by reviewing on- going monitoring programs to evaluate whether current requirements provide adequate protection, or whether areas with high groundwater (at 30 Ccct ar Ic99) requirt more stringent protection. D. Develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with each of the three Regional Water Quality Control Boards which identifies the respcetivc duties of the Water Baard end the DEHS regarding oversight of mitigation efforts. E. Prepare an annual report detailing the number of tanks under permit with the County, the nature oC their contents, monitoring programs in use, the number of facilities inspected, and a listing of sites where an unauthorized release has occurred and its clean-up status. P/A-6-d Because etrtain home occupations use and store hazardous materials and the use and storage of hazardous materials in • residential areas may pose a threat [o the public, this jurisdiction shall continuo to prohibit businesses under a Home Occupation Permit to store hazardous materials for commercial use in residential areas. Violations of this policy shall be ..r.:. .. f.. n• rr:nn M. ~Fn Inroi led:rtinn and/nr .., m .....n• w . _ nv fire authority. In addition, the County shall coordinate with cities in developing a list of home occupations that use hazardous materials or generate hazardous waste within city jurisdictions. The list shall be distributed to city and county planning departments. ES-32 CHAPTER 7 • REGULATORY PROGRAM FOR GENERATORS (Ineladiag Tnnsporten and new TSD Facilities) The federal law governing hazardous waste management, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), originally exempted hazardous waste generators producing less then 1000 kg (2200 Ibs) per month of hazardous waste from compliaoce with that law. The 198d amendments to RCRA, (the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, HSWA), lowered [he exemption threshold so that businesses producing more than !00 kg (220 Ibs) Der month of hazardous waste are now subject to RCRA. California has taken a differept approach. California has never had any threshold value for determining compliance with the hazardous waste management requirements. Any business which produces a hazardous waste must manage that waste in accordance with state requirements regardless of the amount produced. Although many of the California laws have been in effect since the Seventies, local enforcement of these laws began in 1983 with the MOU agreement. In September of 1983, the DENS entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the California Department of Health Services. Through this MOU, DEHS agreed to monitor all businesses who generate or produce hazardous waste within the County to ensure that they comply • with all state laws and regulations pertaining to the generation and management of hazardous waste. Approximately 2100 businesses have been identified as generators of hazardous waste; these businesses ere under permit with the DEHS. c_.....:,.. .rr,.... r.,,,.t, w. ^dnnr rn door" aweens. eompilina lists of businesses likely to generate hazardous waste based on Standard Identification Classification Codes) were undertaken by DENS to identify generators. Despite these efforts, the DENS estimates that there may be as many as 500 more hazardous waste generators doing business within the County which the DEHS has yet to identify. Additional mwsurcs are necessary to identity all generators. The business license and renewal form is recommended in this plan because of its success in many counties and cities when used as a screening tool for determining whether businesses handle hazardous waste. Educational assistanec, assistance with disposal of waste, end consideration of the needs of the limited quantity generator (produce Tess than 5 gallons or 50 pounds of hazardous waste) must all be addressed in order to ensure generators comply with regulatory programs. ES-33 GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G-7-1 7o ensure that all businesses in the County that use hazardous materials and generate hazardous waste properly manage these substances. G-7-2 To provide hazardous waste generators with the necessary tools to comply with existing regulations by continuing generator education and technical assistance efforts. G-7-3 To determine the need for and feasibility of providing disposal assistance to small quantity generators. Policies/Actions P/A-7-1 Because hazardous waste gcncrators need a permit from DEHS and such a permit requirement ensures on-going compliance with regulations, and because not all hazardous waste generators have been identified in This County, this jurisdiction shall continue ifs efforts to identify hazardous waste gcncrators by using Geld surveys end instituting cooperative efforts with fire agencies to exchange information. • P!A-7.2 Because a consistent method of identifying businesses that use and generate hazardous substances must be in Dlacc, this • jurisdiction shall use a business license (or similar requirement) and its annual renewal to determine whether businesses handle hazardous substances. This policy shall be implemented by the following actions: A. Development of an agreement with all incorporated cities within the County to ensure that questions regarding the use of hazardous materials and the generation of hazardous waste are included on both the city's business license application form and ils business license renewal form. The information obtained from these questions shall be shared with the DEHS. B. Initiation of a business license or similar requirement for the unincorporated portions of the County to be used for information retrieval purposes. Questions shall request information on the use of hazardous materiels and the generation of hazardous waste. P,A-^-3 because many hazardous waste gmseraWrs arc not aware of local, state, and federal requirements, and providing information about these requirements could ensure compliance with regulations, the DEHS hazardous waste compliance program shall continue to include a strong emphasis on educational assistance to hazardous waste generators. Every effort shall be • ES-34 • made to make these programs accessible to all areas of the County. The following actions shall be taken to achieve this policy: A. DEHS shall continue to publish a quarterly newsletter providing the latest ipformation on new laws end regulations affecting hazardous waste generators. B. DENS shall continue to publish and update the San Bernardino County Hazardous Waste Generator's Handbook which iecludes ipformation on applicable regulations, contacts al other regulatory agencies, and resources such as the waste exchange, recyclers end haulers available to gcncratora. C. DEHS shell contipue to sponsor workshops on regulatory compliance with an added effort to schedule conferences in the desert portion of the County. P/A-7-4 Because hazardous waste generators have expressed an interest in having assistance with disposal of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shalt perform a detailed needs assessment and feasibility study for a transfer smtion and/or County coordination of hazardous waste pick up in all areas of the County. The study shell include consideration of the types of wastes • needing management, opportunities for source reduction, recycling and treatment, and the likelihood of private enterprise meeting this need, If en unmet need is found, this jurisdiction shall determine the feasibility of providing that unmet need. ES•35 CHAPTER 8 • LAND USE REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLERS Public concern exists regarding the potential threat to areas surrounding businesses which use hazardous materials and generate hazardous wastes, particularly with regard to the distance of such businesses to residential and immobile populations as well as major drinking water aquifers. While land use or zoning regulations provide ± mechanism for siting industrial and commercial development, the use of hazardous substances by czisting businesses may not be considered when changes to lend use or zoning Sze adopted or residential devcloDment is approved. Consequently, residential areas may be sited near these businesses (or vice versa). To address this concern, information on the amount and fyDC of hazardous materials and wastes used Dy new or modified businesses should be part of the discretionary review process. Development s[ardards for the review of new or modified businesses Should also be esiablished. A two stage approach is necessary for the proper siting of businesses that use hazardous materials and generate hazardous waste. The firs[ consists oC requiring preliminary information regarding hazardous materials and waste management practices at the time of application submission. The second requires that this preliminary information be documented as specified in state law through a completed business plan, waste minimization plan, and, if applicable, a Risk Management Prevention Program. These plans would be eomDle[ed prior to final eDOroval of the land use application. • All businesses arc subject to the requirement for these plans whether or not they are filing for a lend use application. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS The following goals and policies/actions require the adoption of regulations for the consideration of new or modified businesses using hazardous materials and generating hazardous waste. Goals G-g•1 To ensure that businesses locating within the County incorporate available risk management and waste minimization practices into their operations. G-8-2 To minimize the risk of exposure to hazardow substances by the residential and immobile populations, Policies/Actions P/A-8-1 Aecause information regarding the amounts and types of hazardous materials used end hazardous waste generated are important factors to consider when siting new devcloDment or reviewing existing businesses, this jurisdiction shall: ES-36 • 1) Amend the Development Code (zoning ordinance) to: • a) require new businesses to submit detailed information regarding the amounts and types of hazardous materials used and hazardous wastes generated, the business procedures implemented to manage these hazardous substances, and the emergency procedures employed in the event of an accident. The applicant must demonstrate that the business operetioes are consistent with hazardous material/waste legislation. 61 require sew or modified businesses to complete a business plan, waste minimization plan, and, if applicable, a Risk Management and Prevention Program prior to final approval of a land use permit for a new business or modification of an existing business. The requirements specified in AB 3777 (Chapter 1260, Statutes of 1986) and AB 3205 (Chapter I5, Statutes of 1988) regarding the applicability of the RMPP shall be identified in the amendment. The plans shall be submitted to the County DEHS for review and approval. 2) Expand outreach efforts to city and County planning agencies, city and County building and safety departments, and the real estate industry regarding new planning and reporting requirements as well as she identification of the . types of businesses which may be affected by these requirements. Such a Drogrem should include the development of brochures and flyers describing the requirements and en idcntificatioo of types of businesses which art likely to handle acutely hazardous materials. P/A-B-2 Because certain quantities of acutely hazardous materials could pose a threat to the public health and safety and the environment, this jurisdiction shall amend the Development Code (zoning ordinance) to require a conditional use permit for all businesses or governmental facilities handling acutely hazardous materiels in excess of 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet. P/A-8-3 Because inappropriately aired industrial facilities pose a threat to the public, and because zoning ordinances do not identify quantity or use limitations far hazardous material/waste, and identifying restrictions could address future concerns with the siting of industrial facilities handling hazardous material/waste, this jurisdiction shall evaluate the feasibility of establishing Siting criteria that identify the types and smounts of materials allowed within particular zoning designations. The study shall identify a list of chemicals end appropriate thresholds which would cause a business to be subject to specific land use restrictions, recommend changes in the Development Codc (zoning ordinance) for review of such industries, and identify ES-37 the advantages and disadvantages of imvtementing such an • ordinsncc. ES-38 CJ • CHAPTER 9 • HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE Household products can be Classified into five general groups: household cleaners, automotive products, home maintenance end improvement products, lawn and garden products, and miscellaneous items like batteries or pool chemicals. These products are common household items. They are often discarded improperly because most individuals do no[ recognize their potential danger. Improper disposal of household hazardous waste (HHW) may lead to injury to refuse collectors and equipment damage, and when disposed to land, HHW msy contaminate soil or groundwater. Disposal to landfills, storm drains, sanitary sewer systems, and the ground, as well as evaporation and storage of these products, can lead to human health and environmental concerns. In 1984 the County of San Bernardino established a comprehensive program for addressing the HHW problem. The program began as a pilot project under a grant from the California Waste Resources Control Board. The study dealt with the feasibility of separating HHW from the municipal waste stream and disposing of it properly. The County opened two permanent collection centers in February, 1985 as part of the gran[ project, one at the County Agricultural Commissioner's office in San Bernardino and the other at the Central Valley Fire Station in Fontana. Based on the success of the pilot program, the Roard of Su Dervisors approved County funding to continue the program end subsequently approved funding to expand the program. The County HHW management program includes: o Five permanent Year-round collection centers. o One-day collection programs called "Round•Ups" in areas of the County not served by the existing collection ccntcrs. o One-day publicity and collection "events" to publicize and encourage the use of existing ccntcrs. o An on-going public education and information effort to increase public awareness of HHW issues and also provide educational materials to schools and interested groups. With the location of only five permanent collection centers County wide, there are vest areas of the County which are not being fully served by this program. The increased popularity of these events has increased the number of users to a Doin[ where storage size of the San Bernardino site may not be adequate. New permanent collection centers may be added [o the program since the Round•UD events are very labor intensive. The Aound-Up events require trained personnel to accept, sort, and package large amounts of waste for processing (recycling, treatment, or disposal) in a fixed amount of time. Alternative measures to expand the ES-39 program should also be considered, however. The program should be • expanded to include collection centers at landfills, enforcement efforts at landfills t0 discourage improper disposal, and continued public education efforts. Participation by the County Solid Waste Management Department is recommended. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G•9.1 To ensure the effective management and disposal of household hazardous waste County-wide. G-9-2 To prohibit unauthorized disposal of household hazardous waste in facilities that handle wastes. G-9-3 To inform the public about the need for proper disposal of household hazardous waste and to inform the public of the availability of the collection centers. Policies/Actions P/A-9-1 Because recent studies at municipal landfills show evidence of contamination from hazardous wastes, this jurisdiction shall establish a strong eufarcement program to prevent disposal of household hazardous waste in municipal refuse facilities. • P/A-9-2 Because household hazardous waste is disposed At local landfills and because a strong enforcement program will detect significant amounts of household hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall . ArvNnn hmwehnlA ha>a rAnua weatr. Aiversinn nrnarems at ell facilities where waste is handled, [o properly manage these wastes. Whenever possible, collection centers should be established at appropriate facilities with public access. P/A-9-3 Because the capacity at collection centers can not accommodate the needs of the entire County and the diversion program will add to the amount of hazardous wastes requiring special management, this jurisdiction shall address the County's needs in effectively managing household hazardous waste by establishing a larger transfer and processing facility. P/A-9-4 Because public education efforts have alerted the public about prober methods for disposal of household hazardous waste as well as the availability of household collection centers, and because there is s need to continue these efforts for County- wide public awareness, this jurisdiction shall continue its comprehensive public education program. ES-40 S CHAPTER 10 • TRANSPORTATION Hazardous waste is traosDOrted by truck out of the County to treatment, recycling, and disposal facilities, and into the County from other areas for treatment. In t9EtS, San Bernardino County exported about 41,000 tons of hazardous waste; hazardous waste imported into the County comprised about 9,000 tons. While no current estimates exist for transport of hazardous materials, national estimates suggest that transportation of hazardous waste is relatively iosignifican[ compared to the amount of hazardous materials transported. Theca hazardous materials become hazardous waste when spilled in the environment. Federal and state agencies are responsible for the development and etlforecment of the transportation regulations throughout the state. Federal and State legislation require the proper identification of transported materials, set minimum standards for cargo containers, and require that hazardous waste be tracked from generation to ultimate disposal. The use of the uniform manifest/shipping DeDers, Dlacerding oC transportation vehicles, vehicle safety inspections and the use of a uniform format Cor reporting incidents which involve a hazardous material release, have resulted from these regulations. Although federal and state agencies art responsible for the development • and enforcement of transportation regulations, the local jurisdiction can have a role in the transportation of hazardous material/waste in the County. The local jurisdiction may designate routes, restrict hours of transportation, institute notification requirements for certain categories of waste, and provide educational and training opportunities in the rfAfICOMfYfI(,O !If t1AfAIlrO11C mArff1A1/WACrf. IO AddlrlOn. fhf. tOr.At jurisdiction may implement road mitigation measures, such as repair of roadways, to reduce the risk of transporting hazardous materials/wastes. Federal law preempts any state or local requirement which is inconsistent with the requirements of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA). A state or local requirement may not be preempted if the DOT (or the courts) determines that the start or local requirement vrovidcs an equal or greater level of protection to the public than the federal requirement. Federal law specifies, however, that the state or local requirement cannot unreasonably burden commerce. GOALS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS The following goals end policies/actions address the need to unsure salt transDOrtatior. of hazardous waste through the County. Goals G-IO-1 To ensure the safe transportation of hazardous materials end waste in and through San Bernardino County. ES•4I Policies/Actions • P/A-10.1 Because safe transportation of hazardous waste is an important goal of existing state law and local jurisdictions, specified hazardous waste facilities shall use routes that can safely accommodate additional truck traffic, do not Dass through residential areas, and ux intestate or State divided highways as major routes. P/A-10-2 Because local jurisdictions een have a role io the safe transDOrletion of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall establish a task force whose DurDOSe is to develop proposals for specifying routes for hazardous waste transport, iden[i(ying limitations for scheduling times of day and days of the week, types of wastes that caa be transported, and the need for notification requirements. Also, tht task force shall further assess the routes of concern (Highways 58, 62, 71, and I-IS). The task force should be composed of members of the public, City, County, and regional transportation planners, emergency response personnel, and industry with expertise in transportation of hazardous substances. P/A-10-3 Because specified hazardous waste facilities must have access to safe transportation routes, this jurisdiction shall require applicants for specified hazardous waste facilities to fund an analysis of transportation concerns (sec policy action P/A-S- 4(6)(d) Chapter 5). The transportation study shall provide a • description and analysis of the projected volumes of hazardous waste transported into and through the County. The transportation task force identified in policy/action P/A-10.2 shall participate with local Government staff in develooina the ' scope of the study, The study shall include, but not be limited to: • An identification of ell reasonably available highway and railway routes in [he Southern California region and the development and comparison oC the risk associated with [he alternate routes; • A comparison of the risk associated with transporting hazardous waste in different truck end rail cargo tanks; • An identification of route-specific, risk-reducing measures for each route examined; and • An identification and evaluation of procedural (i.e., training. routing, curfews), technological (i.c., equipment innovation), and external risk•reducing measures (i.e., road improvements, emergency response improvements) to transport hazardous wesle by truck and by rail. P/A-10.4 Because planning for safe transportation of hazardous waste is a regional concern, this jurisdiction shall work with regional • ES-42 transportation planners in ensuring [hat local issues are • addressed in regional transportation plans. P/A-10-5 Because state highways are used to transport hazardous wastes through the County and it is eecessary to maintain highways in good condition, this jurisdiction shell participate with regional, state, sad federal governments in determining priorities for funding and repair of highways in the County. P/A-10-6 Because transport of hazardous waste on local roads has not been considered, this jurisdiction shall study end develop transportation and routing plans for the transport of hazardous wastes within urban areas. P/A-10-7 Because knowledge about safe transportation of hazardous waste es well es state tnd federal transportation regulations is important for proper management of hazardous waste, this jurisdiction shall continue its education program for hazardous waste generators. The program shall include information on proper labeling, Dlacarding, and manifesting requirements. P/A-10.8 Because transportation of hazardous materials is an important issue that needs further consideration, and because current plans do not address the [ransportetion of hazardous materials end these materials are transported through the County on a regular basis, this jurisdiction shall require the task force • identified in Policy P/A-10-2 to consider transportation of hazardous materials issues as well as those of hazardous ~.vaste. ES-43 CHAPTER 11 • ENFORCEMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE Enforcement and emergency response arc two critical elements necessary Cor the effective management of hazardous waste and materials. The County's enforcement program ensures compliance with hazardous material/waste regulations by conducting both investigation and, possibly, litigation of potential violations. The emergency response program, on the other hand, consists of an emergency response team composed of active [rained personnel sod a model emergency response plan (Arta Plan) that identifies the resources and responsible agencies in the event of an emergency. These programs ere critical because [hey ensure comDlianee with hazardous material/waste regulations and the local jurisdiction's preparedness in the event of an accidental spill or release. Also, important to proper management of hazardous material/waste are insDCC[ion and monitoring efforts. These issues arc discussed in Chapters 6 and 7. GOAIS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS Goals G-11.1 To ensure the safe management of hazardous substances within San Bernardino County. G-II-2 To continue providing a comprehensive response to emergency • situations in order to protect public health and sa Cety and the environment. 4.2 Policies/Actions P/A-11-1 Because consistent, periodic inspections of hazardous waste generators in the County ensures compliance with hazardous material/waste regulations, the County shall continue [o conduct a hazardous waste generator and hazardous material handler inspection program. The program shall emphasize education and technical assistance to hazardous material handlers and hazardous waste generators regarding regulatory requirements and waste minimization. Every effort shall be made to implement this program in all areas of the County. P/A-11-2 Because inspection and enforcement efforts arc conducted by several different agencies and a combined enforcement program may ensure continued compliance by businesses in the County, the County shall continue to coordinate enforcement efforts with the State Department of Health Services, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the Air Quality Management Districts, and other federal, state, end local agencies. P/A-II-3 Because enforcement efforts provide a mechanism for ensuring compliance with hazardous material/waste regulations, the • ES-44 e County shall continue to fund the enforcement program through permit fees. P/A-L-4 Because emergency response procedures involve several diffcrcnt agencies, the County shell develop an on-going awareness program that informs the police, fire, and other agencies about the procedures and responsibilities specified in the Hazardous Materials Response Area Plan. P/A-Il-S Because the County has significant cxpcrtise in coordinating responses to cmergeocies, the County shall continue to be the coordinating agency Cor the Interagency Response Team. P/A-11-6 BtC9uae response to an emergency requires trained, experienced personnel, the Interagency Response Team shall continue its advanced response capability training. • ES•45 CHAPTER 12 • SITE MITIGATION AND LONG TERM REMEDIAL ACTION The prevalence of Hazardous materials and products has been widespread throughout the County and cities, as these products are commonly used in our society. The consumer demand for these materials requires that businesses handling hazardous materials and generating hazardous waste be located in every jurisdiction. Such materials and wastes have been produced and handled Cor many years, and accidental releases of these materials have created a multitude of contaminated sites. The most common threat associated with these sites is the potential movement of hazardous contaminants through the land to water supplies, particularly groundwater aquifers. Other problems associated with contaminated sites include: toxic emissions, improper land use in areas on or surrounding contaminated sites, and short or long term risk to public health end safety. Several federal, state, and local programs have been developed to identify, charac[erizc, and ultimately mitigate contamination and potential negative impacts at these sites. These programs have resulted in several lists which idantify sites targeted by each program. These lists often duplicate each other, although considerable differences occur among the lists. While data are being compiled on these sites, they are incomplete because there are difficulties in tracing boundaries of operation, finding responsible parties, and fully assessing the extent of the potential contamination. The available data arc maintained by many separate agencies, and risk • determinations and mitigation methodologies arc not yet completed for most of these sites. In addition, these lists may change as sites are discovered, created, or mitigated. 1 ne ubje¢rirea of wur~ u ..,. y:Jj: e... ^d •h0. ~, Irnn~ cite liars are to ensuro that jurisdictions are aware yof these sites, that timely and complete cleanup occurs, and that proper impact review is conducted as a Dart of the development/land use review process. When data on hazardous waste generation projected from cleanup efforts are made availablC by the responsible agency, it will be included in the data analysis section in future revisions of this Plan. However, most sites have not yet been evaluated by the responsible agency. GOAIS AND POLICIES/ACTIONS The following goals and policies/actions address the need to coordinate activities related to site mitigation and long term remedial action. Goals G-12-I To ensure that all jurisdictions are aware of all identified contaminated sites within San Bernardino County. G-12-2 To ensure that timely end complete cleanup occurs at contaminated sites. ES•46 • • G-12.3 To ensure that environmental review is conducted for projects proposed on sites which have been idemified as contaminated. Policies/Aetioas P/A-12.1 Beeauu current information on She location and status of Neanup of contamiaated silts is of vital importance for development in the County, epd because the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) List is not frequently updated nor does it provide details as to the contamination or status of cleanup, this jurisdidion shall develop a coataminated silts data base that provides geographical, physical, and land use characteristics for use by applicants and industry. In addition, the County Department of Enviroomeomi Health Services (DEHS) shall update the OPR list on a periodic basis end provide a DEHS updated list to each jurisdiction, The DENS updated list shall also be used by this jurisdiction to assist in identifying contaminated sites associated with land use aDPlieations. During DEHS preparation of an updated fist, the following may be included: a) information on site contamination and its applicability to different types of development to assist cities and applicants, b) information regarding the current cleanup status of • contaminated sites, and c) addition of sites to the OPR list. When DEHS proposes to add a site Io the OPR list, DEHS shall first notify the owner in writing. Analytical evidence shall be ~wui, uu ucfwc a aiw is iiaaeu. Tire uwum ai~aii nave ii uaYx from the date of this notice to make a written request for e Administrative Hearing regarding [he proposed listing. When requested, a hearing shall be held prior to listing a site as contaminated. P/A-12-2 Because cleanup of contaminated sites is a complex task which involves multiple agencies, DEHS shall monitor and work cooperatively with ell agencies involved in site assessment and remediation. DEHS shell consider developing a Memorandum of Understanding with state and regional agencies to provide assistance and oversight of monitoring, assessment and/or remediation activities. P/A-12.3 Because the method of remediation can cause impacts, the County end cities in conjunction with the State Deparmwi of Health Services shall encourage onsite treatment and remediation to reduce the transport of hazardous waste from contaminated sites, and should insure appropriate remediations are completed to provide permanent remedies. `~ ES-47 P/A-12-4 Because site remedia[ioa activities require Coordination and expertise, DEHS shall implement a sift assessment end • remediation program and develop a program to enhance training of persognel ie site usessment and mitigation techniqucs, and risk assessment techniques. P/A-12.5 Becauu site assessment ^pd remediation creates costs to the local agencies, the County should investigate funding possibilities for cleanup activities. This should consider how local agencies cap recover full or partial payment from resDOnsible parties for cleanup of contaminated sites, reduce the duplication of effort among ail agencies, and minimize the cost of work. The County and cities should support legislation that defines the responsible party in regard to the assessment end cleanup of contaminated wiles, as well as legislation that improves access to state and federal Superfunds [o cleanup orphan sifts. DEHS should seek state funding for underground storage tank remediation programs. P/A-I2-6 Because state law does not specify local actions or procedures for projects proposed at a location listed by the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) as a contaminated sift, and impacts may «sult to the public health and safety, and because development on contaminated sites may preclude future environmental remediation this jurisdiction shall amend the Development Code to implement the following as a Dart of the development review and permit issuance process: • a) require a OreapDlicalion meeting for ell development/land use aDDlications at locations listed by OPR or DEHS. ~) ,w~L~ ,ii ucvciuyweuyiana use appltcauons at locations listed by OPR or DEHS to be subject to discretionary conditional use review of this jurisdiction, except when deemed not necessary by this jurisdiction. Exemption from discretionary review shall bt based on the scope of the project and the nature of the contamination. P/A-12-7 Because this jurisdiction has a concern with proper cleanup and funding for Cleanup of contaminated Sites, this jurisdiction shall do the following: a) Recommend, by resolution, to federal legislative representatives that legislation be developed to require Department of Defense to include site cleanup and to set aside money for cleanup (at present cost) as part of base clDSUre Clans, and b) Require that aclean-up plan which includes the source of funding be submitted to DEHS for review and approval before new or alternative land uses ere undertaken. ES•48 . • CHAPTER 13 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND PARTICIPATION An effective public participation program depends on early and continued planning to generate input from abroad cross scetion of the population and the regulated community. The overall Dublie participation program for the CHWMP allowed Cor Dublin input on concerns and priorities; suggestions for alternatives and pew strategies; and review and assessment of proposed measures. An effort was made to inform and encourage participation from the general public, civie, environmental and business organizations, the cities and agencies within the County, and the regulated community. Also, the services of a public participation coordinator were secured to assist department staff ip implementing a public involvement program. An extra effort was made to get input by early November to meet the pecember 31, 1987, Draft Plan deadline. Preparation of the final CHWMP required additional public involvement efforts. The CHWMP public participation program consisted of the followin8 elements: on-going advisory committee input - distribution of newsletters - distribution of an informative brochure - a series of public workshops - a speakers bureau and slide presentation - media coverage S - distribution of 3000 copies of the draft Dlan summary and about 750 copies of [hc Draft CHWMP - a series of pubic hearings on the Draft CHWMP Successful implementation of the CHWMP will depend on continuing public •decetica - :r..pc;:u... of N'uvu i~awruuw waste management. Continued efforts in this area will need to focus on public involvement in the implementation of the programs specified in the CHWMP and on public participation in the review of proposals for specified hazardous waste facilities. GOALS ANO POLICIES/ACTIONS Public participation should take Dlece throughout the implementation of the CHWMP programs as well as when applications for specified hazardous waste facilities are recr:ived. The following goals and policies/actions ensure continued efforts in involving the public. Goals G-i3-1 To continue public particpation and public education in the implementation of the programs identified in the County Hazardous Waste Management Plen. G-13.2 To include public involvement in the «view of applications for specified hazardous waste facilities. ES-49 PolicieaJACtions • P/A-13-1 Becausc public participation and education is important for the preparation and review of the CHWMP, the County shall establish an on-going Hazardous Waste Management Advisory Committee to review reports on implementation of the plan, to Consider new program directions, to guide a continued public educatioo program, and to assist in revising and updating the Hazardous Waste Managemcnt Plan. P/A-13-2 Because state law requires the formation of a Local Asscssmen! Committee (LAC) within 90 days after receiving an NOI, this jurisdiction shall establish by ordinance policies and Orocedures for the formation of the Committee, the selection of members, and the role of the LAC in regard to other decision-making bodies. • ES-50 • CHAPTER 11 II~LEI~NTAT/ON OF CFIINMP PROGRAMS The CHWMP recommeads uveral Drograms which eddras the County's goats regarding effective 6aurdous waste managcmeot. In order to achieve these goals, reasonable efforts must be made to implement CHWMP Drograms. Implementation depends on the establishment of program priorities, the identification of funding sources, and the development of a schedule for imDlementetioh. The Drograms recommended io this Plan were separated into three categories for implementation: immediate, firs[ year, and second year implementation. 'the categories reDreunt both the priority for implementation and the Dropoud implementation schedule. The Drograms placed in the immediate category reflect [hose Drograms that provide the needed foundation for future County programs; they are the highest priority Drograms. Programs placed in the tint end second year implementation category are also important but can be delayed because of concerns with funding or because issues related to these programs have been addressed by Drograms identified in the immediate category. The priorities may change, however, based on the availability of funding, changes in local attitudes, and the recognition of new conditions. Some Drograms likc the ordinance amendments may be implemented all at once • if staff and funding sources exist. The attached table summarizes the information regarding implementation of the recommended Drograms. The implementation schedule, responsible agencies, resource needs, and potential funding sources have all been identified. The majority of the programs will be funded by permit fees. Jome oI [he progtam3 arc one-time (Le., Ord maraca emendmenis) cfforis that can be absorbed into on-going County projects, others like the transportation studies require the identification of funding sources. The table presents the County's best estimate of potential funding sources. ES-51 4 s w ••1 ,y ~ y Y C ri ~ ~ F M j M y • 4 C q ~NU m s • ~ w •3oe w eq • °~~° tl°~ p siaue x •m4 a a N F 9 A ~ Oe °aa0.b • oi ~ qi O o is°m °e • . " a • e a YV o r a 4N4 •q 4r~•4C . •p N m F gE•gM N g CgO qq [•JS N O• Y qk •qm C•• Q 0. ~NN ~ SiUWb Y50. TW NH UWW •pN 'q ~ mq0 O4q ~i a c Y $ $..°~ m g AH4 b O aC 1 • Yr ~1 OU qqM qN 0 M CmU•A y0 S"Pw• C •q y' m O Y ~ 4 y ~G4 alI p M . a OY ~ Nq a S•4 s~ • MMm4 YYY 4 4q m a •4q qmc N NhaY U •kYgq Nh• q Or{ b m° $~oaoo ma°+m o °N b tl aVN VqC yaH ~ o ut y A a m Fg a z N S ~ E N S z Ji ~ w y ~ ~ w M 4 N 4 4 O O N O 4 O 4 O 4 M O R m 9 q y• •• q p q~ e ~ Y9~ + •q0 •q GMC CYC qm Oq ~9 tl ~'~~ 9 ye 9q i i'i gg epa eoi p y;3°i N R.NN aNF amN aMlp. Q M a G K • ~ M e ' Y•1 Y m0 • q 4) 9• y y U ' J q P~ q 0 C j F ~C G C y 0 9 g ~0 M 1 5~ 4 . 0 ~ ACC ° ° ° .. jpq y V U S p ~ 0 •P OU C u • ~ iw~sS w wa a kU S a y k qp q N Q L ~ O q V y C mY QOM -• I VV • p + q {L> C p •y' y0C b g q. i000 pp~ y a• A i /y 0 0 M CY M qM O q Y m ~M V V q y3 • ••• ' • g y q • +ml ~ O a ~NM •' • C • . 1• m gY C Nq a U tl u y^~ g R • ~ y ~ ~ p~ M2 yM9q q • 9iMgN y mg iq qq + . Nj SO UO NP4 p4~ ~ m q b N om NY (Cma UU y C • N i 11 M 1 q 4 a 1 MNp nh Cq4 `~ h q ..wNOC rl +1A . i M d N Y1 1~ q yy ~• r q qNC M ~'4ca ••••M M~gY9 •+Y Mqh r~ My qm "l .~ m ab N q H G O g p y oo C .~ p a } m 40 m ~ • S 0 I I 9gPA p ^ m m.~ c a 4 p p m uu4 uv.+Yi 4 C l J .. .m m qC ~. l q q~l4 M R 4gOL pp yy Y~~NC~~~ Y pG4N C C -l=-lM mmO A y •~•I A.4 UpCmVmgOY ON F p q Y 4 Om E gg9 MVFi4 q..- t gP0 .~}A4~M m•4 U4 N qb C OG p CY A C p~0 L~y. >g 4 p W C J(9m m a 0 ~ 4C „I L / yl q fi A i~ o~ u i 6 w 4}Y m q u Y i - Om y4 b• ~>Uq 0 m ~ qA ai m.>ip mb . LY a r m% m e b u a o Y p UY ~O] m ~Od CgpM R 4i O q N U " l Y ~.i A iCb4U J 9 H ~ L • N ti 5 H U E : ~y tl u a i Du p O O 4 •L C C 4 O O R M O d N 4 O 0 A Y A q [ n m .O NU y C q „ I l 9 `` m A ry 0 p m ~O m JJJ Um Em U 4 U !4 • ..4 VG H Cr iH KHN mC Nigi • Y u o4e o ~ .1 Y m Y -~ bU Yp 2N M YON Y U y Op?J i ~ U Y YO u AMm Y .• 14 0 2 O N 0. ~ Y Y } } } O W O 4 ~ 9 >~ ! G n ~04~ i 4 p UU ~ 6 'g ~y .~O ~ • 0 N p ~ A 44 ' ~ N P p •>~ Y U A9 O4 >l C•A> YP mU44 q qNY 00 c0 y Cd0 ' Dv q u • p~4iYGq ~ •~1C .1 O/ r Y q• C06 • Yy M Y Uy 4J 0M 9 Ntl gC• mC W ? y epm pp Ym Ot410~ N ym~~P wm: H O N4 S W p4a .+ M N 'J .. >940 h 6 4 N 94mq 4 ~•~ U p H a .1 O IT O~ C q p O U ..4 n pC ~ ..p C4 ~ .. pG CO a r1a .~4A nlJgO n 4T qY N V w IEn M M .Yj O 4 b OI O. 0 0 Y Y M 1 q N . of Fo CO G~ p r_•oW uW y V~ Y tl G Y am t ea m as>m 9ii.m~ .°Ix°" OgdM um N>rm mm00 4 Np~'Sgd Ui NA 944 •OUal YOgqNY yWN ydC AY 54u0 ugO ggW G~pNOC~j! YO(.IM 9Yygy K N920 ~OMU6 yO~NN D 96'U L~iOYq LHYgT O yC m+l Aw mVMm9 N SA99 ~~tt>Ld ti>9V0 K OMgA W9UgY W9SFN W O W ~ .a x w uca oti mw we uouo 2 J N q O N W •m~ !!~~ yqN ~3J ogu ~~u v N N M O 4 O 4 O 4 O M 'H +1 h' YYA mYA mNA H 9AJ 9AY 9AM iW YN C C>.m Cm•Nm R7 e ~ O 7Ytl YO ~WM KMN 04dM a a I u a q 4 P Y C O b. C U O m M a tl u e q /O~ ~J q O NyCC m Uq O NY ANOp~ b Mp0 q~N N yM A qN qN p OVVO q4 b N 9 9 4.'I O C Y d M 'n A AM CN N d • ~1 d 4 Y Y Y1: V 9O Ari C0 Y N O N • HO A y q .1 L A ~ U ~ A d Y .~ M -1 G F O Yq '14 T~ G CM X04 N N U .4 tl r4 M q q Tu q^ M M O V O AY M0V N YA ! 'h • qY d COY q4M • P LLL YY 4pp A .CC61O > .,Nj G w$ .Yi q'~ ..Cj UOy -Ni4 ] AG 4gMU pp q .-1 ~N .1N y tl q 4 y .yO O y q9 A MO OqA 7 0 u A U 4• >~M A+~ WN N Am CO HNU a1 mq A4 H^ 9tlC4 NE 1 YO m9 NYN •NC Mq0 • 'J4Y UO ..V N'J 9M •C •CN CF. ~• YM • N NO WN Mq dM/J N .7.0 OY •• NC M ~i 11 N N Y 1 U 4 ^~ I• q 0 N MY VY .~ .nA ~].A ~ MrIM NryM vq MYUi b .~N Nom' PIQi H • r INiI C m 0 0 • o u • tl a m e a a m m w ~ C N' a% m % 9 a a YF d F R 6mV w 9 w 6Cm FN CN SOO C U w y yd H ~ 0 1 S O W 4 0 p W OwY ~ FW FW N Y V 9 O V P C 4 Y wQY Yq a O y dHY>~O 4 YYC mWm r j A ti Y Wm U ~qU Yw 00.pN~ > ~>q!~ mUWm aL O 00 p >pON4 YCWm a Y Qy N YYmNm 9 N 4 QNU d ~ O d V Y V ~Y y Y30 3E ° u N Oa>NO Y y Y N E YO U O S m 4 y N W d q > T ~ R mO~Y Yy >Y Mq0 9000Aq O MqN p q Y HO a HY N mY YbM ~ = ~~ y y i OVq] y O C Y Y ~ NOYN 6 yq SC4 • •i N O yN. N ~ ~. :i a O y O Nw 11~~ R O y~ OZ1 y g •~ V rl O N O Y w M Y .p 4 0 V O 4 0 / O / 90V CYC 9YY YYA C9Y YYm 99M aw CYC mf•a G > u mi u s s ^9m • qq tl . ° " aNN 6Y 7Y0 3 ° wo ° w «~ ° q q u u w d N. i aa. . ew.q. aw,w C P O C d w C ° o a w u 4 u ~ ~ / O w,,w 4 N •NMY p~ e e a O C Y N 0. N Y m n.l O q NM Y C M 09 p ~ pdTU d N 4 N O q}a O r1 C q ~ y C4 j 0 MOOm w Nti O Yti lM ~ ~ M: YMN O O U 9 ./i p~ p N~90 C L q V Y A mm 0. .1 C. O Y M N 4 4 Y tla C ) DO N Y r1 p/N tl wwu C CO N4 a mY yW ow wCM1ti ] O w tlNm j Yp~m„M tl O O y' y! Mn M 4 N U A49 ^ 1 q C1 gN ~4 O d 0 O YC m 0 ! wC q o 400 e a N q Ytl VNC O N .1 W 4 ti/C~n . i > .~w H .~ KO C N AO AY M mwY y YgYw d m m > dY tlYY > ApC w• YUN ~ „~ tiC4 W; n0 KYU p A pp G~ n m 4 C . G L j w 'q'~ HQ 4A 'iN ~b HUH w r 60n ~ . ~+ 1 tigj N {H m w •+ N M 9• 0 N G p V H E E k N I I • m Y T O 0 ~ a R P+ + Cu o 0 04 e W 6 0 W ! q q'O Fa F CC St F u O K 8~ as P 0 C O/9 }. 4 M q •4q A rVYb4 Otl4Nq u ~ ~ ~wN u }. VNf.GNq 4 ~ N C u •g9VM V 4p.1OYO SOOY9F o 6q.N 90A y z a T N N V Y .~ q m m •dgOCmYO oaYUOmoe gm•1UV/ C T0-/IGw d 5-01 •YiY9 OY,-ml ca uat'po> Y90 •hYm g8°>wgmo Y m m O 4}/ mC/OiVO %~gaO04yOF N1H •Y O mLm m m • 1 u e m e ti m 9 P Y mNq O~Y/C ~SuCM cu.°.i SwaPY oHOZd 0 m u M T N • FO m>. Om>O O /A00 gOMgOmA] pa0 •O.CU u SE.44/ ?OUYmO.1Y S~ tl mP~C~C OL Or10•.OIUO pN moYeeo° • 6i+'.'E 4q9 ~q•M q V 0 9 x-19 6N r~ /4091Y1;ilm OF/ig06aU e ++ /e Ne yy8pM tZi1H H OCq tlF0 m •^ UyY w a N • WC Cm Y €• H my %0 w/ A Y Y Y N M D 4~ M y 4 0 y O p Y q •( Y q qq Qlgq M [~ y y m/ C/C 9 Y M cyC 9 Y/ Cyp q 0/ FYC S~ g Y 9 m G m 8 Y y0 ~ .• 1 'm Y ~~ m 'U ;o • $$ Y w w a . i u'a . i u°Va i . uua S • r uNa Nb M K M Q H H N N p(m R4 q b q -. i ~ • p .i w w e ~~ • m N p / • O ••I U N N ~ I M NTH O 04 q O p q O /„ R O a 4 4 0 PIJ N C M1 Yrl pq VON O aq 4 • rFip YYOH P•~ O p J1 C M p O m O O Y M p d 4 O Y V n4 H O qN q Y 7 y O M r1 4 Yq pL p~ M N 10MSmq N qC M gM ~ 9 K q p C 4 C 10 COONp 4 q ,G ~•~ N N .1 '; U L~N'ga ~~pp f. N O ON C p b4 M a gMtiNgO d.-1 U G p ~•~N •N ~1 •i4p q • 4 ppN/ N 1 uy. •4mU p 40Y M44 •-1 .6 ~Nq p-~ V H N H 4 TO rrw p w Op~•Y .+N PMC W H/ O q O q)m/ 04 • ••Ngp~l N ~.1 / H .• q 4 / q ~• O . O } C 9 E H ^ y N 4 W M• w I N G• O / • w Y N •I • N O 4 O M E a Ip U O M OpN NIU MYN 1• O• NC q I •1q NO•y• gVpON C w ~•C H ON ..p Oq HM .-..1 Hi i CYYY 0. ~M .1 q •~4u •Y)V i •'R •~ d •.q M gw06+1 u r • Y1 • pby GN N O dq m ^4-~tf tid d ply N Mq C 4 "i p p S b m m O ~ 4 O M'mi ~~ OI O O m i ~'q'i , . N C0.4 aq 7 MM D • Ny0 `q m 4 01"ib4 N U my Y 9y 4 Y p ~ C9N b N9 q q OO N [ Hain zyba 4NN N; 06 ~ ~ i R U 4C M 4 ~ W O9bDm • U9 m Y~4CMF 1 9 (1 SrS OG 9gSpbW Obb ' q Y 9 m M1 WUM1 OmN V1Rmv>U ~Op4vV dN WU Nm mm 2W e V' U ~ 0 N 9 9 Q • 9 N . G ~ M d G . V w u dN + i . i. i Y OYOU4O d v bY~bO CC 40 cb N ° ox a.." d om ox + +. ~ ° mo w Y aix y8 u b db NGq Wj d dq p~ 6U4~mV ~V y y ~q0 p O A ~ Om V OV i L ~9Y^ a4 yL a O 94 >UmWti.-. GOL y O Y _ q O 9CCCV ~YSMU~ b60 M !G 'F.M R 2b OOW by NUm 2dA HiGaYb WbM ~ad G W H b Mq M U $U N O ~ Q O O y p 0 G 4 4 V O G si o o c 4 O R F ' O4 OmL 9 M Q9Y .i m N O Y A N q 9mV M ~~ W mN ~Vm dNd y GNG S d OO m 'm; H W V4N ^YY ObN V 9 ^Cm ` 09d MW 6WM Ow8 bU4 umN 4 RWM RNH • H R ~y b s 99 ~ C g 4 • • VW v4 m 0 M C ~ 94MH m M bq Y b MC V C 9VN YU4Y j 0 p p yy A YO ~ q 0 9+i .i G m M dP M Y tlOb g O • U E 9G4Mq V YY >.b U G N^ a i xC '. I 'i by O NM m C GYN OH • C+i q y Oa0 G • S Y "~ Ub4gC R o9 CO O O a d 9 9ANgq V Yp 9Y AO' H m CGO b b4H ~ N4N O• V VG mti 40 A qv4 t~ 4 W ~ Mq., i :~ ~ tlM Yd Y > 9 w p~ O V H ] ~ 4 G • > -i 9 6 •.i F 4 O ti y ^~ O ~ AC Mu y p~ ~ I SYN MY nm MGUm P b b4m g E ..0 H;P.IM.1 S .N../ .IC4 iVM ~~ WR.OM H9 ..00 b r h W a~ • , °z ~ i -ai m o a •.y9 sic c °O ° a R • . , , 909 A ° ~ M M p ~ N m0 y o 0. S46 .~ I i K 'o 6 ~~ 1~ z°a Id c m -gem m 9u tiUM0~4C~ NH 660 q 6YTm°N °iV N m.l O i t=.l m YYYLO L >YC m Y •YmYti C 9=194CmOG w •++C M u ~~i~~g'a ~OGWG~OO OMOOE47Y N O O Y 4 Mq qm b7 O~ 6 y O MH qm %b Y1 9 m M U O O O I 4 M ~ F '~ fy' °•u m°Y ° ~a 3 ~.°ie c wq 0! ~° ;O y .fie y ~ Ha a.. 1. a w a r Y O4 ~ YO ° S . ~ a mY . ~~ ~ q-IS ~ Yq M • w•O ,A H~• H i ~ Y M 9 . i 44 6900 ~ °Y.°H M ~ O T M M M Y O C qaq ~ ~m•Y °i q~Y Y a ° ° SYM U w iC m d o. i u . i U ~ a ~ Y 9 M 6 0 U ~ 1 p • ~'~ u 1 Y m ~i M nO , p d ~U6O nA9 ~a w4 •w4 py ~ ~ C ~ 1 . . n • q a ti Ym e . sa N MN HY C •C Y 6O .+Ygu m C m a a. m z yym c"um Oq ~M Gs3os =:r4~' m mm20 6PgMy EGSCp ui9+°iK ogolY' ~sN~~ ~ yyI ~ 1e .1 D d~~t m N •