No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/06/05 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETIIVGS let and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. June 5, 1991 Civic Center Coun©1 Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 q~ City Councilmembera Dennis L. Stout, Mayar William J. Aleaander, Moyor Pro-Tem Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Pamela J. Wright, Cauncilmcmker t~ Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 - Ciiy Councii Agenda June 5, 1991 1 All itps subaittad for the Citp Council Agwda orst be in writing. The dudlina for suhaitting thew itps is at00 p.m. on the wadauday prior to the orating. The city Clsrk~a Office raca3vu all wch ;tps. A. C***~t. TO pR=6R 1. Roll Call: Buquet _, Alexander _, Stout , _ Williams _, and Nright _, $. AMNODNC~IT6/Paaaaumamf,wo 1. Presentation of Proclaortion Commeagrat ing the 40th Anniversary of the Blood Hank of Snn Bernardino and Riverside Counties. 2. Introduction by Captain Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, 01 Lieutenant Joe Henry, R-9 Handler Danielle French, and hor partner "ROeky." C CONMDNYCATIONB FROM TH6 Pt This is the lime and place for the general public to addrasa the Citp Council. State law prohibits tbs Citp Council from addressing any issum not psavioualy ioeluded os the Agenda. The city Council asp receive tastiaaap and net the utter for a aubaequent seeking. Coorsnta ere to be lisitad to five siautec par individual. D. CONSENT a wNDAR The following consent Calendar itps era expected to be routine end non-controversial. Thep will be aetad upon by the Council nt one tine without diaeuasion. Any itp nap be removed by a Cauncilaeaber or amber of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: April 11, 1991 May 1, 1991 May 15, 1991 (Stout absent) 2. Approval of Warrant e, Register Nos. 5/8/91, 5/15/91 and ~ 5/22/91, and Payroll ending 5/9/91, far the total amount of $1,924,595.34. .~ ~_ Ciby Ccuncii Agentla Juno 5, 1991 2 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Bear 6 Wine 73 Sat inq Place for La Salsa, CC Restaurants, Incorporated end Villareal Aeetaurent Group, Incorporated, 10709 Town Censer Drive, Suite 110. 4. Approval of Names Lor the Sports Complex Interior ~5 Streets ae recommended by the Park and Aacreai lon Commission. 5. Approval of Destruction of City Records sntl Documents 16 °~tr" __o .c ....y.. zeyuirra es providatl undrr Government code Section 31090. RESOLUTION NO. 91-134 ~~ A RESOLUTION OF TFZB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHOAI ZING THS OESTRVCTION OP CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH AR8 NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 6. Approval to expend $1,500.00 LO acquire anti-graffiti 20 signs ftolo We-Tip to be Yunded from asset seizure account No. 70-276-531. 7. Approval of annual loan transaction between the City of 21 Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. _. Approval to find the earmakian Company, developer for 22 Tract 13886 and Parcel Hap 11394 in default of their Improvement Agreement dated February 8, 1990 antl extended to May e, 1991; and authorize legal staff to cause the tleveloper's surety, Developers Insurance Company, Performance Aond No.'a 983330-5 and 983116-5, to correct all existing Improvement deficiencies antl complete ail remaining improvements pursuant to the Agreement, approved plane and epeeificatione. A - ~.~_ ~ City Council Agenda 'j Juna 5, 1991 3 A65oLUTION NO. 91-156 228 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CAL IPORNIA, FZNOING THE BAANAAIAN COMPANY IN DBFAULT OP THEIR IHPROVEMBNT AGABEMENT POR TRACT 13886 AND PARCEL NAP 11394, AND AUTHORI2ING LEGAL STAFP TO CAUEB TH6 DEVELOPER'S SUABTY COMPANY TO CORRECT EXISTING IMPROVENENTS AND COMPL8T8 REMAINING IMPAOVBMENTS PURSUANT TO THE AGABEHBNT 9. Approval of a Resolution of the Ciiy Council of the City 23 of Rancho Cucamonga officially protesting Ban Bernardino county's Illegal offset of County Booking Pee Charges against City Property Tax and other revenues. RESOLUTION NO. 91-135 2Q A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, OFPICIALLY PROTESTING SAN BERNAADINO COUNTY'S ILLEGAL OFFSET OP COUNTY BOOKING FEE CHARGES AGAINST CITY PROPERTY TAX AND OTHER REVENUES 10. Approval of Payment of city Loan (CO 88-045) In Full. 25 il. Approval o£ a Joint Poware Employee Benefit Authority 26 (PARS) (CO 91-031) ae meeting Federal Government requirement that employees not coveted by a retirement system be covered 6y Social Security effective July 1, 1991. 12. Approval to amend Contract No. 90-149 with FRA 29 Service e, Inc., Aeseaemert District Management for an addi[ional amount of $7,000.00 from Special Funds Account No. 33-4131-6028. 13. Approval to vacate a Portion of Vincent Avenue including 3p the adjacent 30-foot wide sidewalk easement, located north of Jersey Boulevard, east of Red Oak Si reet, RESOLUTION N0. 91-136 J2 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING TH8 VACATION OF A PORTION OF VINCENT AVENUE INCLUDING THE ADJACENT 10-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT ~^~t ~ city Connell Agenda ~~ June 5. 3991 4 14. Approval to accept Aeal Piaperty Improvement Contract 36 and L18n Agreement from Joe and Carla Bentivegna for e single family residence, located at 7805 Sierra Vteta. RESOLUTION NO. 93-137 37 A RESOLUTION OP TBE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A ASAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LSSN ACRBHNBNT PROM JOE AND ..,u.La tlaNTIVEONA ANO AUTRORIZING THS MAYOR AND CITY CLEAR TO BIGN TNS SAME 15. Approval Lo reject all bitla for the Sierra Madre Avenue 40 Street Iroprovement, located from Arrow Route to Ninth Street. 16. Approval to award and authorization for execution of 41 Contract for Arrow Route Bridge Improvement Project (CO 91-032), located at Cucamonga Creek for the amount of $370,410.26 ($336,736.60 plus lot contingency), to be funded from Syeteme Development Pund, Account No. 22- 4637-8738 and FAU Fund Account No. 24-4637-8775. 17. Approval and execution of Program Supplement Nc. 5 (CO 50 91-033i to Local Ag¢ncy - State Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State-Local Transport at ion Partnership Program between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the Construction of the Milliken Avenue Underpass and Street Improvements between 6th Street and Jatsey Boulevard. The Supplement sate the Stara reimbursable portion of the project at $996,096.00 and the City'e portion at $3,fi45,634.00. Revnbureable funding from the supplement agreement shall be deposited to the SH-140/Fund 35 Account. RESOLUTION NO. 91-138 52 A RE SOLOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 5 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. STLPP-5420 FOR THE STATE-LOCAL TRANSP0RT:ITION PARTNERSHIP PROOAAH POR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MILLI KEN AVENUE UNDERPASS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN 6TH STREET AND JERSEY HOULEVARD r rrz city Council Agenda June 5, 1993 J. 5 18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement 8xteneion for 56 Tract 12870, located on the north aide of Highland Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Saet Avenue, submitted by Dnly Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 91-139 58 A RESOLUTION OP THS CITY COUNCIL OF THH CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEFffiNT AGAHENHNT EXTHNSION :...u anrxuvxMxnT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12870 19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension fox gg Tract 12595, located on the west Bide of Baker Avenue between Paothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, submitted by Rnncho Ciilland Development. RESOLUTION NO. 93-140 61 A RESOLUTION OF TNH CITY COCNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IHPROVEMHNT AGREENENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12895 20. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 62 Tract 13281, located ont ha northwest corner of Saee Line Road and Rochester Avenuar submitted by Covington Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 91-141 by A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13281 21. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension foi 65 Tract 13336, located on the northeast coiner of Archibald Avenue and Carraxi Street, submitted by Friedman NUmee. RESOLUTION NO. 91-142 (~ A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13316 - City Council Agenda June 5, 1991 6 22. Approval to executes Improvement Agreement Sxtenalon for ($ Tract 13441, located on the northwaest cornet of Victoria Pazk Lane and Kenyon Way, esubmitted by trope DevelopmenC. RESOLUTION NO. 91-743 70 A RESOLUTION OF TNS CITY COUNCIL OF TFIS CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVBI~NT AGAESHENT 8%THNSION AND INPROVBNENT SECURITY POR TRACT 1344Y 23. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 71 Tract 13873, located on the northwest corner of VSetoria Park Lane and Atwood Street, submitted by Atwood Victoria Joint Venture. RESOLUTION NO. 91-144 73 A R650LUTION OF 7TIE CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OF RANCRO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR TFACT 13873 24. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 74 Parcel Map 9498 4th Street Nedlane, located on 4th Street east of Haven Avenue, submitted by Reiter Rinker Gateway/Haven Gateway Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 91-145 7.r, A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL HAP 9498 4TH STREET MEDIANS 25. Approval to execute Smprovement Agreement Extension for 77 Parcel Map 11410, located on the south aide Arrow Route between Haven Avenue and Ut1Ca Avenue, submitted by Ui is a-Haven Aeeociatea. RESOLUTION NO. 91-146 79 A AESOLllTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IHPROVEHSNT AGREEMENT EETENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY POR PARCEL MAP llalD A ~ ~~} ~., city Council Agenda ~ June 5, 3991 7 26. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and 80 Notice of Completion for Parcel Hap 9498 Haven Avenue Hediane, located on Haven Avenue at 4th Street. Releeee: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) S 66,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-147 81 A RESOLUTION OP TFtE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ~..: ur AAHCMO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPAOVEHBNTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9498 HAVEN AVENUE MEDIANS ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COMPLETION POR TH8 WORE 27. Approval to Releeee Haintenence Guarantee Bond for 82 Tracts 9399 and 9400 located on the north aide of Banyan street, between Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue. Release Tract 9399: Maintenanc0 Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 4,900.00 Release Tract 9400: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 2,500.00 28. Approval to Releeee Ha intenance Guarantee Hood for Tract 83 12642, 12935-44 Landscape, located on the southeast corner of N.illiken Avenue and Banyan Street. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 82,200.C0 29. Approval to Releeee Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 84 12936, located on the west aide of Hillview Loop at Rattle Peak Place and Ht. Palomar Street. Releeee: Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street) $ 10,800.00 30. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 85 12938, located on the north aide of Terrace View Loop between Minoral Peak Couzt and Mammoth Peak Court. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Sheet) $ 13r9fi0,00 r f city Council Agenda s ~ y ) ~{ l y.~ ; s June 5, 1991 S 31. Approval to Release Haintenencs Guarantee Bond £or Tract 12939, located on the seat aide of Hillview Loop at 86 Tioga Peak Court, Pikes Peak Court and Kettle Peak Place. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 5 8,500.00 32. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 87 12943, located on the east aide of Nlllview Loop at rixee rasa court and Tloga Peak court. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Sond (Street) 5 10,900.00 33. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13560, located on the west aide of Netherlands View Loop 8b at Mt. Sterling Court and Mt. Laeeen Court. Releases Maintenance Cuarantee Bond (Street) 5 6,600.00 34. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13642, located on the east aide of Beryl Street between 89 19th Street and Hamilton Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (street) 5 21,000.00 35. Approval to Set a Public Hearing Date of July 3, 1991, for an Environmental Assessment Review for the ro p posed 7u Haven Rehabilitation Project, 4th Street to north of Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 91-148 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROV INO AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARI NC DATE OF WEDNESDAY, JULY 3, 1991, FOR THE PROPOSED HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION PROJECT, 4TH STREET TO NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW 36. Approval Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting a Public Nearing for July 3r 1991, to levy the annual 93 assessments and approve the Preliminary Engineer's Reports fox Landscape Maintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and B. ~„ ~', Clty Ccuno i1 Agenda June 5, 1991 9 RESOLUTION NO. 91-149 93C A RESOLUTION OP TN8 CITX COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARINO ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSSSSNENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 3, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5, 6, 7 ANO 8 POR THE FISCAL YEAR 3991/92 PVRSUANT TO TFO; LANDSCAPING AND LIGRTING ACT OP 1972, AND OPFERING A TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING nw.rnnm.n..~ m„__~;„C RESOLUTZON NO. 91-150 93F A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ODUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP CITY ¢NGINSEA'S ANNUAL REPORTS PDR LANDSCAPE NAINTENANCB DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 30r 4, 5, 6, 7 AND e 37. Approval cf Prelimtnaty Engineer's Reports and Setting 94 a Pub lic Hearing for July 3, 1991, to levy the annual aeeeeamente and approve the Ptellminary 8ngineer's Repor ts fos Street Lighting Mnintenance District Noe. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. RESOLUTION NO. 93-151 9h8 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF AANCHJ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STAE¢T LIGHTING MAINTENANC¢ DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, k, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 POR THE FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 pURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OP 2972, AND OFFERI NC A TIME AND PLACE FOA HEARING OB3ECTION3 THERETO RESDLVTION NO. 91-152 94E A RESOLUTION OF THE CT TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNVAL REPORTS POA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, k, S, 6, 7 AND 8 - }`~ ~ City council Agenda June S, 1991 30 E. CONSHNT ORDINANC68 The following ordinanaa lava had public borings a! the tine of first coding. second readings era •:petted to ha routine and non-controvsreial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Ths City Clerk will rand Lha title. Anp ito can ba resnvad for discussion. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSSSSHENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02 - CI'"Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - To define and eeteblleh development Criteria for recycling ueee within the Industrial Area Specitic Plan. ORDINANCE NO. S47 (second reading) 9y AN ORDINANCE OF TME CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR RECYCLING COLLECTION AND PROCESSINC~ AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF P. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following itos have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as rsquirrd by lrw. Ths Gair will open the meeting Eo receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND (U~ RESOLUTION POA THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN TE7S PAAX AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT f88-PD1 RESOLVTION NO. 91-153 i~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA~ CALIPORNIA~ TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARE AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARRS) D. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items Gave no legal publication or posting requirements. The chair will open the aaeCiag to receive public teetimogp. ~' ~' ~ „~ Olty Council Agenda ' June 5, 1991 ~e~ ~ 11 SOS 3. CONSIDERATION OF RBOUSST 80R REFVND FOR PORTIONS OF DRAINAGE P865 POA 13383 VICTORIA STREET - MR. JAMES BANRS. JR. - Located on the south aide of Victoria Street and east of 8tiwanda Avenue. e. CITY MANAGER'S STAPP REPORTS The following iteaa do not legally require any public tsatinony, although tba Chair up open the ratino for oublic input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT IHPROVBNENTS. RELEASE OP BONDS iOZ C A A R p1 MON,Q STREET AND SAPPHIAB STREET Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $587,400.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 58,740.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-154 103 A AESOLVTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CVCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUELIC INPROVEHENTS FOR TRACT 10210 - ALMOND INTERCEPT CHANNEL AND AUTHOAIf ING THE PILING OF A NOTTCE OF COMPLETION POR THE WORE 2. CONSIDERATION Oo COUNTY REFERRAL 88-05 - VNIVERSITY 104 CREST - Preliminary Plan of Development, Master Tentative Tracts, Tentative Tract Mape, and Final Plan of Development for 1,7.39 single-family units and commercial, school, park, end open apace on 1,111 acres in the Rancho Cucamongn Sphere area) request for review of the City's requests to the County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. RESOLUTION NO. 91-155 i)2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COVNCIL OF TH8 CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE SUPPORT OP THE SAN BERNAADINO COVNTY BOARD OP SUPERVISORS RELATIVE TO THE CITY ACTIONS TO ANNE% THE ETIWANOA NORTH SPHERE AREA '},~~ City crunch Agends ,~q ~ aunt 5, i9s: C(l~( 12 I COUNCIL BtleINEBH The Following Sias have base xaquasted Dy iha City Comcil for diatuaaion. Thep are sot public hating Sias, although the Chair way open tba rating for public input. No Items Submitted. J IDEHTIPICATION OP ITENS POA NEIT NESTING This is the Lir for City Comcil to idutify tDe Sias tnep rich Eo diatuu at the neat peting. Tune Sias will no! 6e discussed at Chia aeeliug, only idulified For the aaat acting. ^ONNC^IICaTIONS PROM THE PUBLIC This is LDa tir and place for tDa general public to addras• the Citp Ctuncil. State law prohibits tba Citp council fmm addressiag any iasw not pavioualp Secluded on iha Agenda. The ciip Council up receive tsatirap sad set the roar for a subaeguut rating. Coranta ate Lo ba liaited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJO __ XEETIN6 TO ADJOURN TO HyECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS P&NDING LITIGATION WITH ANHAICAN INSiIRAIiCE AND PERSONNHL NAT4'HRS. EIECUTI V6 SBSSION TO ADJOUIW TO JUNE 13, 1991 AT 7100 P.N. IN THE TRI-00lM[RIITIES CONPHRPa1CE AOON POR A BUD(SET NORRSHOP. S, Debra J. Adams, City C1erA of the City o£ Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the fore9oino agenda waa posted on Nay 3i, 1991, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 civic Center Drive. April 11, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES di Darned Workehoo An adjourned workshop of the City Council of the City of Aancho Cucamonga met on Thursday, April 11, 1991 in the Covncil Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was Called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor Donnie L. Stout. Present were Councilmembere: WL11 Lam J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane will isms, Pamela J. Wright, and Hnyor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy Clty Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Otto Erouti 1, Deputy City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner) Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Boae, Deputy City Engineer; Jerry Grant, Building Official; Joe Schultz, Community Services Director; Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent; Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance officer; Jim Fro et, City Treasurer; Chief Dennis Michael and Deputy Chief Lloyd Almand, Aancho Cucamonga Fire protection District; Sgt. Ted Housely, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Cletk. . • 4 . R B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION B1. DISCUSSION OF COST ALLOCATION AND USER FEE PLAN Jim Hart, Adminiat rative Services Director, stated that at the March 20, 1991 City Council meeting staff presented the coat al3ocat ion and user fee study for first review, and asked for direction on how to proceed, and the Council decided to have a public workshop to receive input on that study. Ne stated once all of Che discussion and study was done, etafY would Fresent a complete package to the Council based on the philosophy determined by the Council. He stated their goal was to have th ie process completed in June eo that it could be made part of the f fecal year 1991/92 budget process. R444R4 Councilmemher Alexander left the meeting at 7s10 p.m. RRR4RR City Council Minutes April 11, 1991 Page 2 Jtm Hart, Adminletzative Services Director, outlined the types of charts contained in the Executive summary. He stated staff contacted the Chamber of Commerce, the Building Industry Aeaocletion (BIA), Lewle Homes and the William Lyon Company, provided them with a copy of the Bxecutive summary, and asked for any input prior to the meeting. Hs stated the B1A was the only group that reepondetl, and that information had been provided to Council. He than introduced BYad Wilkes and Srin Payton from David M. CYiffith and Associates (DMG), Who would go over the Executive Summary foz the Council. Brad Wilkes, OMG, referred to the packet that was previously delivered to the Council dated 4-11-91, which Consisted of the fee schedules from the Bxecut lve summary. He spoke about the caste used in their calcu latione and reviewed the mar hnAn ~.aew •-- +-~--' ~' ,y ewel aiiucauona and full costs. He referred to the Decision Tree chart on the first page ane explained its use, and how they used that chart in their coat analysis. councilmerober Wright asked if the use of the Decision Tree could bo viewed as n science, or was it subjective to the philosophical bent of each Council. Brad Wilkes, DMG, stated it was bent according to the thought process of the individual, but in general most of the time An activity oou ltl be categoYized either to the left or right, eo it was not an exact tool but St could be used to help in the decie ion making. Brad Wilkes, DMG, then went on to page 15, the detailed summary sheet for the PLanning Department, and explained the layout of the chart. He felt the community developmenC activit lee of Planning, Bngineering, and Building and Safety, would basically benof it an individual and nut khe community, and would recommend they try to aggreeeively recover costs, though not necessarily 100a of the coats depending on the category. He also stated there was an addendum to the Planning Oepartment'e chart, which had recommended changes Erom what was shown on the charts. ARf RIf Counc ilmember Alexander Yeturned to the meeting at 7:30 p.m. •Rf Rtt Councilmember Wright asked about the Planning Appeal Fees Erin Payton, DMG, Stated Item 3 on the Addendum requestetl tliract ion fYOm the Council regartling those fees, ae the Planning Department felt they could not or should not attempt to recover the Coate involved in processing appeals. Councilmember Wright stated sometimes the community might be the beneficiary of an appeal instead of just the developer. She asked if it would be poeei63e to dif £erentiate the fees for the dlf fexent users. Brad suller, City Planner, stated he felt it could not be broken down ae to the type of class or individual, that the fee would have to be the same for all. city Connell Minutes April 11, 1991 Page 3 Brad Wil kee, DMG, then referred to page 17, end stated in general for the Planning Department they were recommending aggressive coat recovery, eepscially for commercial and industrial users, and leww for the homeowners and individuals. He then covered the total costa for user fee activities shown on page 19. Councllmember Euquet stated he had asked at the previous meeting about staff costs far the Commiseione, and asked where that waa In the study. Erin Payton, DMG, etai@d the staff costa £or preparing for and attending commission meetings have been included in tho different appllcatione listed on the summary sheets. wuuuiin~~uwr ninxanmer awkea 1[ there Wee a Way to break out come of Lhat cost. Erln Payton, DMG, stated that was shown on the detailed ehestw submitted by stet f. Jim Hart, Administrative services Director, stated they could qo back over the work sheets and draw out the information for the Co,amieeione. councilmember euquet stated St was not just the Planning Commission he was asking about, that he use interested in the coat to support all of the Commissioner and not necessarily in relation to user fees. Brad Wilke e, DMGr than covered pages a0 and 21, and explained how they tried to set up a eyatem for items that could not fit into a "base fee^ structure. Brad Wilkes, DMG, then went on to the Eng ineerr ng Department £ees on page 26, and explained the difference between the non-tee and fee categories. He also explained about the items that were showing a unit volume of one, and that they were calculated on a total coat and not a unit cost. Y.ayor Stout asked how lung it had been since the fees had been adjusted. Brad Wilke e, DMG, stated it would depend on the department, that the Building Department had recently raised their fees. Jack Lam, City Hanager, stated the last time was in 19Ed, and they were adjusted only on a basis o£ peY sheet value, there was not a comprehensive study done at that time. There have been some lnflat ionary adjustments made since then, but no major changes. Brad Wilkes, DMG, stated that activities showing rero in the current fee column would be new fees that have never been charged for in the peat, and they show what they have calculated for a fee. Jim Hart, Adminietrat ive ServAcee Dltector, stated that Engineering ie an area where he tali the philosophy of the Council needed to be determined tefore they could actually determine a unit coat for preparing a resolution. City Council Minutes ApY11 11, 1991 Page 0 Councilmembar Wright aeketl Lf they hnd a brenkdown on fees where they ars recommending a substantial increase, so that the council can enalyae the impact it would have on the current users, because she thought it might inhibit building in city. Brad Wilkes, sMG, stated a way to do that would be to take a recent project and run the coat of the uaeY fees using the old and new amounts, and then you could see the impact on a real project. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated another way to lock at it was that about twelve years ago when the City flrat set up a fee schedule, it was considered the highest in the County, but they also had the highest issuance of building permits it a+~+ ~ 1r."_=: - ,.,. a ,ar rood. >inee then several clues have gone through various changes in regartls to cost rer.OVery, and now some of the highest fees are charged by the County. Ne stated the whole philosophy in local government ha0 changed eo that those areas thnt benefit tY.e individual should be recovered, and how much should 6e deterrolned by the policy makers. Councilmember Wright was concerned that they would be able to determine what the impact of their decision to recover eoete would be, and how they would affect other areas. Councilmember Buquet felt it was important to keep in context that if the Council decided to not raise the fees, there would be a subsidy factor involved which would create a shortfall. Councilmember Wright stated she thought they might be halting development by inrreae ing the fees, and thus hurting themselves in the long run, though she felt development should be paying its way. Mayor stou[ felt the issue was more complex than whether user fees were inc reae¢d. He et atetl they were dealing with a market economy which had a lot to do with what other cities cY.atgad, and if Limy were all charging approximately the same fees, then no one would be developing any where based upon that fee. He felt if you artificially lowered the fees below what it costa and eubaid ire development with the general taxpayers' money, the pricing of the product ie still based on the market and you are putting additional profit in the pockets of the developer. He stated several bankers have advised him that fees have very little to do with the amount of development, it is based on whether or not developers can get financing Eor their projects, and that the fees were a minuscule portion of the coat. Councilmember Wright felt if their philosophy has been that development pays its way in Rancho Cucamonga, they have not been tloing that, but she wanted to have more detailed information before making a decie ion on the amount to increase the fees. Hayor Stout asked about the Flood Hazard Lettet, if it was the letter homeowners request to get out of the PNHA situation. Jqe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated that was correct City council Ninutaa April 11, 1991 page 5 Nayor stout atated he would like to have that item looked at also, because ha felt that should not be charges at such a high rate. Brad Wilkes, DHC, than want on to page 30 with the Building and Safety Department Fees, and went over how the fees were analyzed per program. Ha atated they are the department that moat closely recovers their costs since their fees were just revised a few months prior. Nayor stout opened the meeting for public input an this section. Addressing the City council were: Prank Williams, B1A, atated he had noticed the absence of comparisons with eurroundinc citi we in a..me ..~ tho foc_ _.._ - u Limy wrung wun the increase of those fees, was the stacking of Other fear such ae transportation, park development, etc. He felt this affected the affordability of homes for the consumer. He hoped the Connell would be reasonable when it canes to nn increase of any Ease, and asked if the reason they were increasing fees was to control growth. Mayor Stout atated that was never the intent of the City. Councilmember Buquet atated that might have been a consideration several years ago, but felt they had a lot of standards in place now and were not intimidated by growth. He fell the Council was looking at this issue £rom a bueineee perspective. Frank Williams, BIA, atated they wanted to pay their share and be fair, but felt it needed to be determined what was fair. He felt they would be pricing the small developer out of bueineee. Mayor Stout atated it would have been more comfortable if they had increased fees incrementally since 1984, but they have not been recovering costa since then, and felt the taxpayers have been eubaidizing development sl/ that time. He atated that traditionally the small developers have not built in Rancho Cucamonga. Councilmember Buquet felt the building industry passes along 1006 of ire coats to do bueineee. He Yelt the City was a corporation of Caxpayere and felt they bed a reeponeibility of keeping within a reasonable range, and if they were not recovering their Coats in a reasonable manner, they needed to do so for the taxpayers. Gary Luque, William Lyon Company, asked also that the Council be reasonable and fair. He atated he did not view the Council ae being anti- growth, and felt the City waa doing a careful review in controlling their growth. He understood that the City needed to recover their costa, and felt it would be helpful if it could be reviewed annually. City Council Minutes Apxll 11, 1991 ?age 5 Mike Laeley, Lewis Nomee, stated there wne a review of the Daeign Review procedure currently taking place, and asked that the increase in the fee for that portion be postponed until that evaluation was complete. He stated that Lewia Honule was also a major property owner in Rancho Cucamonga, and their property taxes go into the General Pund, and hoped their taxes would help keep fees from being Lncreased. There being no further response, Mayor Stout closed the public comments section. Jim Hart, Administrative Services Dl rector, stated that if the Council agreed with the philosophy that has been eat forth in the study, and the recommended fees for the Planning and 6ngineering areas, they could direct staff to begin putting [hinge together 1n reecLUt ion form for the count>1 to review xor the Community Development area. Couccilmember august atnted he is rot ready to support a 1004 recovery rate at this time, he felt there were some things that ware market driven and he was not comfortable with an acroea the board recovery at 1008, especially st this time. Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director, stated Council could direct staff to develop items based on 1008 recovery, but they could choose how to implement that structure, possibly phased in over a period of time. Counci lmember Buquet stated he would agree with an Lncremental phasing where they coo Ld get caught up, but not to take it all in one step. He then suggested that when that ie accomplished, they have an annual or bi-annual review eo ae not to be in this position again. Mayor Stout felt they should recover the full coat ae recommended by the consultant, not neceaearily 1008, and felt their study was very prudent with a few exceptions. He also stated he was not in favor of an incremental approach and have the City continue to subsidize the building community, because he felt the fee structure would not have an affect on the amount of building done in the community if the economy were to pick up. Brad Wilkes, DMG, stated that in their experience, they have found that even though the increase looks Large an paper, when it has been calculated into the Coate of various projects, the amount of the fees was minuscule compared to the total coat of the project. He stated that moat cities choose to increase their feae at one time instead of an incremental approach. Counci lmember Buquet asked Lf staff had an set imate on what percentage the fees would be in a project. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated they would have to research that, but felt that would be a small factor in the cost of a house, that the coat of land and the cost to carry would be the driving factors for the developer. Count ilmember Wright stated she would also like to see a comparison of certain fees for some of the larger feae with other tit ise in the area. She stated she also did not perceive a large amount of protest from tfe dsvelopnient community regarding the increase, eo would not be again et the recommendation. City Council Ninutss April 11, 1991 Fxge i Councilmamber Alexander stated there might be the pceslbility that if they were able to streamline their proceduree they might not have to increase the amount by 1008, and though he was not really In favor of an incremental phaes in, he would not be opposed to looking at an 808 increase while they continue to evaluate the eltuation, but ettll leave it open to full recovery in the future. Mayor Stout stated that on the cost recovery for Planning Commission appeal e, ha agreed with the Planning Department'e recommendation 6ecauae he did not want to discourage homeowners from that avenue of expreaeing themselves. The Council concurred. -. - ~~~~- .=.~u su w zne riooc nazara letters, and stated the homeowner will get a latter from their insurance company stating they will be charged an enorn:oue amount for Flood insurance because they are in a flood hazard area unless they can get the federal goveznment io remove them from that category. He stated the City sends information about their flood control measures and the government decides if they are sufficient enough to change the claaeificetion. Ne stated they have not charged fot it in the past, and felt they should not charge for it now. The Council concurred. ACTION: The Council concurred to approve the recommendation of the consultant, with the exception of the Planning Appeals, which would stay at the current rate, and to not charge for the Flood Hazard letter, and to direct staff to prepare and ordinance for consideration. Cou nc ilmeniber Alexander also felt that along with coat recovery, they also needed to review the use of staff because he felt that could be inflat inq costa, especially in relation to the Cummieaione, and thought they needed to review that and cut out the unnecessary act ivit iee. t 1 Y A• f Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:15 p. m. The meeting reconvened at 9:30 p.m. with all members of Council present. • • . . The Council then rev iewad the summary sheets for the Fire District. Brad Wilkes, DMG, stated fire departments are generally different from other departments. He stated fire departments traditionally think of themselves in regards to fire suppression, and do not usually think about recovery of user fees. He stated this District has fees set up that closely recover coats, but have not been charging them. He stated they are recommending an aggressive recovery program on some of these fees, ouch ae plan review processes, uniform fire code inspections and permits, hazardous material responses, false alaxma, etc., and referred to page 40 for total amounts. He etaisd that user fee coats ware approximately $500,000.00, and That they currently collect about $158,000.00 because they were not charging fees that were on the books. city Council Minutes April 11, 1991 Page A chief Michael, Pira District, stated that when they implemented the Uniform Fire code permit fees, the Hoard decided that the District was to only levy this charge when a bus Lneae coma Ln instead of on an annual basis ae laid out in the ordinance. Me stated the consultant was recommending this be an annual charge. Mayor stout asked if ik was uncommon to charge those costa un an annual basis. Chief Michael, Flre District, stated that was not uncommon. Counc Llmember Buquat stated he would like to sae the Plan Review process addressed, becnnee he tali it was a bad policy to double charge for a review by the City and the Pire District. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the caste in this report only pertain to Pira personnel. Be etaied that when they consolidate the Fire Prevention Bureau offices at the Civic Center that will alleviate Cne duplicate caste, and this coat allocation report takes that Into consideration. Counc ilmember Baguet al eo referred to page 30, Item 90, Fire Suppression, and stated he would like to see the City find a way to recover coats from homeowners and their insurance carriers. Chief Michael, Fira District, stated that the majority of those calla were not for fire suppression but for 6M5. Counc ilmember 5uquet stated maybe they needed those figures broken out then, but if they were responding on afire euppreaaion call, he felt they should be trying to recover at least a portion of the coat. Counc ilmember Wright tlid not agree with recovering coats for fire euppreaaion, that it ehoultl be a service provided ae part of the taxes collected. councilmember Williams asked if this would apply to people that did not have fire insurance, or were underinsured. Councilmember Baguet stated that would be an administrative tlecieion, but felt those cases were few, and that moat insurance companies would pay for the coats involved. Chief Michael, Fire District, etaied that moat carriers have provisions to pay a certain amount towards fire euppreaaion eervicee in their policies. Councilmembera Wright and W111 lams expressed concerns that the insurance companies wcultl alert raining their rates if cities started recovering coats fox fire suppression eervicee. Mayor Stout felt they would need to confer with the City Attorney an who they cou ltl charge for their because they would have to be consistent from a legal standpoint. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comnsnte on the Fire District fees. There being no response, the public comment section was closed. City Council Minutia April 11, 1991 Pees 9 Councilmember Alexander stated they needed to determine standards and staffing levels for the collection of the fees, that determining fees was only half of the procedure. ACTIONS council concurred for etaEf to prepare rerommended Eeee based upon those submitted by the consultant, and update the resolution for adoption by the Pire Hoard. ~ R • • t The Council then revLeaed the Sheriff's Department user fee study. Bzad Wilkes, DMG, etntea the pnllosopny regeea ing law enrorcemen~. ayanc ann wen similar to that of fire departments Ln that user fee activity was a small portion of the entire department's coats, eo tradit tonally they have not thought about recovering coats as aggressively ae other departments. xe stated their calculated costa were similar to what the current fees for the Sheriff's Department arer ao there would not be a large increaae Ln their recommended amounts. Ne also elated these costa were drawn up when the Sheriff's were still in the old building on 9th Street, eo there would be soma slight changes in the overhead amounts. Councilmember Buquet asked about the Special &vont Pey Jabe, Item 8 on page 45, and how they arrived at that figure. Erin Payton, DMG, stated that was an adm inietrative coat for processing the requeete for the special event pay jobs. She stated the personnel who work those events are charged out on an hourly rate, but there was currently no recovery of costa for the proceeeiny and coordinating of the requeete. councilmember Buquet stated he di6 not support charging for having someone typing up paperwork, especially at the low volume of requeete that are processed yearly. Councilmember Wright stated she would like Item 6 on page 45, Bicycle License fees, to he higher to help pay for the s'heriff's time in locating stolen bicycles. Mayor Stout felt that bicycle licene ing was a voluntary matter and this was just Co recovez costa associated with the issuance of licensee. Counc i].member Wright stated she would like to develop a bicycle praoocion program through the Park and Aecreat ion Comeiseionr and once that was eetabliehed then she felt it would be a necessary thing to have the bicycles licensed when the numbers used increased to help in the recovery process when they were stolen. She Yelt it might not be necessary this next year but that it would be in the future and wanted to prepare for that. City Council NSnutee April 11, 1991 Page to Mayor Stout agreed thnt theta should be a more comprehensive bicycle program in the City, and felt they should ask the Sheriff's Department and Community Services to work togeiher on a program, but felt it was a separate issue than what they were dealing with in the study. He felt staff could review the program issue and bring it back in a reasonable amount of time, and then the Council determine if they would want to adjust the bicycle license fee later on to account for any changes in the program for recovery costa. ACTION: council approved the fees ae recommended by the consultant with the exception of Items 2, 3, and 4, which should be increased to $10.00 each for reports, the deletion of Items 5 and R, and an adjustment to the position hourly rate figures to include overhead costa for being in the new facilit iee, and ,... ~..~,. ...a._ _- ~ _~___ _ ____.._..__ .. n..,..,..~i.o .o.,t ow. . a x ~ . ~ The Council then reviewed the Daer Fees for Recreation. Brad Wilkes, DMG, stated that Recreation hoe more gray areas when trying to determine user feet. He et ated that there are some areas where they have not been charging fees in the past, and they were recommending the City at least start trying to recover some of the costa. He stated they were also recommending the CiT.y consider a 5-101 increase in youth aporte and senior activities, to keep their annual subsidies from growing. They also recommended that in the area of adult sports, they try Co aggressively recover costa. Councilmembar Williams asked if some of the larger categorise could be broken down into more detail, and hoe the Park and Recreation Commission looked at these fees ae far as policy setting, and were they sure they were getting the moat for their dollars on some events. Joe Schultz, Community 5ervicea Manager, stated they lumped some of those eateyoriea, h as off-site claaaeg, for seas in calculating. He also stated the Park and Recreat ien Commission hoe not reviewed the fees, and ae far ae the quality of the programs, that would take further examination, but Community Services constantly evaluates their programs for success ratios antl effectiveneee. Ha felt the Council would be handling these fees the same ae they have for the other departments tonight, establishing their phi lceophy and setting a percentage to charge. Counclimember Alexander asked if there were children that were not able to participate in some of the programs due to the economic conditions of their families, and does the City address that Seeue anywhere. Toe Schultz, Community Services Manager, stated there were probably people out there in that eituat.ion, but they were trying to make it ae easy ae possible for everyone to participate in classes, that the Council hoe established a scholarship program to easier families that cannot afford the fees. He stated they are having service clubs underwrite that program in order to recover those costa. city Council Minutes April 11, 1991 Doge 31 Mayor Stout eteied the recreation program hoe expanded greatly over the yearn, and asked if there was a policy that allowed recreation etaCf to expend the program ee much ae they wanted as long ae newer programs were able to recover fees, would that work. Joe Schultz, Community Services Director, stated that philosophy sounds good and they have considered it, but it was possible there would be a great program they could develop, maybe something that was new and untried, that that' couldn't guarantee full recovery of costa. He stated they could eat up a programming budget to try end recover their direct costa, but eometimea you have to offer a program two or three times before it becomes popular in the community. ~~°°~ ""'°- C_y.:ct :~: .Lw.o wan aim a pnalosopnlCal approach to the situation, `and that he had~a problem with charging fees fora number of services that were listed on the study. He felt it was the council's charge and reeponeibility to provide services, and did net feel they should have full coat recovery on recreation programs. Cauncilmembet Williams felt they should continue to subsidize the senior and youth programs. Councilmember Buquet felt they needed tc go through and pare dawn the list same, and look at the recomaendat Lone because he would not support anything that was shown ne 100a recovery. He stated he had items 3, 4, e, 9, 11, 12, 33, 14r 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, and 25 marked ae areas of concern for various reasons. He felt they needed to revise their list to be more user sensitive, and he wanted the recreation programs to be accessible to ae many people ae poaeible in the Community. Councilmember Wright asked if they would be able to break down the usage on the field light e, it they could show how much it would be for one field of lights for a night's use. Brad Wiikee, DHG, stated that in a lot of areas in the Park and Recreation category, from a coating standpoint it was very difficult to break down the figures more than they have, and this appl Lee to every city he hoe worked in. He stated when they have not Charged for an activity in the past, such as with the field lights, it ie hard to know how much it hoe been used eo he suggested they might want to start monitoring the use now and determine a more accurate coat in the future when data was available. ACTION: The Council Park and Recreation Subcommittee, Joe Schultz, Jack Lam, Jim Hart, and the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Park and Recreation Commission to meet and analyze the study and prepare a recommendation for the City Council. . . • « • . The Council then reviewed the fee structure for the City Clerk's office. Councilmember Wright stated she felt they should not charge for research time. City Council Ninutes April ll, 1991 Psgn .. Councilmember Baguet dleagread. He felt they could allow a certain amount of time tc be free, to allow for the person Of honest intent to Coma in and obtain information, but that Lt someone comae in with a request for information that will take a large amount of research time, than that Lima spent should bo charged for just ee it Le in private business. Ne thought that should also apply to thtnge like photocopies, that you allow a certain number free, and then charge if it goes over that. Mayor Stout concurred with Councilmember august. Councilmember Wright felt they should charge fur the coat of supplies, such ae the photocopy paper, but that the information Was public information to Which everyone wse entitled to, and did not want to charge for the eervlce of locating that information for the public. She stated it seemed like they ware trying to inhibit the public's access to government, that we would loose the concept of public servant iF they start trying to recover costa for their time. councilmember Buquet felt they needed to Brew the line somewhere, that there was a small percentage of the population that he felt abused the proceee under the guise of "democracy" and •freedom of the prsee", and felt they had a responsibility to set boundaries ae to what was reasonable and what was abusive. councilmember Alexanfler asked if this research time was typically charged in other cities in California. Brad Wilkes, DHG, stated in their expar fence it was rare that research time was charged in the City Clerk's office. He stated that when they looked at the fees for the City clerk's office, they did not go through a coat analysis like they did with the other department e, they just looked at what other cities charge. Councilmember Buquet eiated maybe they could allow a "free period" that ie reasonable, because he felt 99t of the people who come in for information would fall into that category, and then when it gate beyond that then they pay on an hourly baeie. He also felt staff ahculd not have to drop everything to protean a request if it was extensive, that the peteon could fill out a request form and staff could advise them when they could come back to review the information. Jim Hart, Adminieirat ive Services Director, stated it was not uncommon that a request that entails more than a quick answer be submitted in writing, and that some cities respond with what the coat would be to research the request, and that allows the individual making the request to decide what they really want. councilmember Williams felt they ehou ld research how much time ie being used, and how it is being used, and then make a decision. Councilmember Alexander felt if took a staff member more than thirty minutes to look something up, that was too much time. C1ty Council MinuteH April 11, 1991 :aqa :o Councilmember euquet felt that it you wens io any bueineee in the community and asked for information, irrespective of your rights and raeponalbil Sties, there would coma n point where chat bueineee would have to draw aline. Hs agrasd that maybe 99f of the time St would not bo a problem, but still k»lisvad it was appropriate to set eomsihing in place becauaa they have encountered problems in the past when they did not have n written policy in place when a situation came up. Councilmambar Williams felt they needed to determine how much time was being spent in order to make a decision. Counc ilmBmbar Buquet agreed, because he felt there ware circumstancaa that warranted reimbursement. ACTION: Tha Council concurred with the fees ae recommended by the consultant, with the exception of the research time. e • t • ~ Wo communications were made by the public. A• ADJOURWldNT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to adjourn. Motion carried unanimcuely, 5-0. Tha meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved: May 1, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL HINUTBS Regular Meeting A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucaaonga Clty Council wag held on Wednesday, May 1, 1991, In the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 30600 Civ1c Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga; California. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor pennls L. Stout. Present were Cauncilmembere: William J. Alexander, Charles J. euquet II, Diane Williams, Pamela J. Wright, And Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Alao present were: Jack Lam, City Manager( James Harkman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; JerYy B. Pulwood, Deputy City Manager; Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Joe O'Neil, City 8ngineer; Pan James, Br. Civil 8ngl near; Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Enqi veer; Joe Schu ltx, Covusunity services Director; Ingrid Hlair, GIS Supervisor; Jim Hart, Adm inietiat ive Services Director; Duane Baker, Asaiet ant to the City Manager; ^iane O'Neal, Management Aaalyet FI; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Patty Aiffal, Executive Assistant; Chief Denn ie Michael and Deputy Chief Lloyd Almand, Rancho Cucamonga Flre Protection -ietrict; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department? and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. a r . . ~ 8. ANNOVNCENENTS/PREBBNTATiON6 B1. Presentation of Proclamation Designating May ae Mental Health Month. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Mr. Weisman. 62. Presentation of Proclamation Designer ing the Month cf May ae Water AwaYeneee Month. Rayor Stout presented the Proclamation to Charlie Weat and Tom Scholenber9er of Cucamonga County water District. Mr. Scholenberger added he hoped evecyone would be careful not to waste water because of the shortage eituat ion. City Council Hinutee May 1, 1991 Page 2 83. Presentation of Proclamation to Vaca A. Arthur for Dedicated Service to the Community from 1975 to 1991. Nayor stout presented the Proclamation to Vern Arthur. Chief Dennis Michael also presented Me. Arthur with a plaque. Councilnu>mber Alexander also thanked Ne. Arthur for her yearn of service and that he appreciated her efforts. 84. Nayor Stout announced that on Saturday, April 27, 1991, the CSty of Rancho Cucamonga attended the annual We Tlp BanqueE and that the City reeelved the Wa •A.. in rn nlllnn of nFlln eafnfv • i R ! R R C. COMINNICATIONS FROM TNN PUBLIC c1. Jackie Eolda, 11349 Mt. cunnieon court, thanked the Pire end Police Departments for the presentation they gave last Saturday in Alte Loma. R R R D• CONSENT CALBNOAA Jack Lam, City Hanager, stated Item 13, Resolution No. 91-116 should have the words "for 5736 Haven Avenue" deleted, and atld the words "for Parcel 1 of Parcel Hap 7451." Jack Lam, City Hanager, alsc stated that Item 16 should be removed from the agenda because Lt was not ready, and that It would come back on a Council agenda at a later date. R~tRRR D1. Approval of Minutes: March 20, 1991 D2. Approval oI warrants, Register Noe. 4/10/91 and 4/17 /91, and Payroll ending 4/11/91 for the total amount of 51,548,360.65. D3. Approval of Resolution Nu. 91-012D to extend Comcaet Cablevision's Franchise. ITEN AENOVBD POR DISCUSSION BY C0VNCII.)0U®ER ALRZANDRR. RESOLUTION NO. 91-012D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OP SAN EEANARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 30 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OP CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGA City Council Hinutea Nay 1, 1991 Page ~ D4. Approval to utll Lze approximately Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00) from aeaeeemente that heva been levied end collected for Community Facilities District No. 88-2 (Etlwande North Drainage District). These funds will be used for payment to coneultante for ongoing services in the formation of said District through to the Bale of the bonds. DE. Approval of Time Extension for designation of a portion of Cottonwood Way ae a privnte street and exempting the abutting properties from requirements set forth in Chapter 12.08 of the Municipal Code subject to certain specific conditions. RBSOLUTION NO. 91-131 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THB V'ITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI PORNIA, APPROVING TIME B%TENSION FOA TIC DESIGNATION OP A PORTION OP COTTONWOOD WAY A9 R PRIVRTB 6TREET AND BXRMPTING TRB ABUTTING PROPERTIES FROM REQUTAElbNTS SBT FOATR IN CHAPTBA 12.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODS SUBJECT TO CERTAIN SPBC.I PIC CONDITIONS ITEM REMOVED PROM AOmiDA D7• Approval to execute Program Supplement No. 4 (CO 91-024) to Local Agency - State Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State - Local Traneportatiort Partnership Program between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the construction of 19th Street from Arc1!ibald Avenue tc teat cf Maven Avenue consisting of street widening. The Supplement eats the State reimbursable portion of the project at $76, 614.OC and the City's portion at 5275,267.00. Reimbursable funding from the Supplement Agreement shall be deposited to the Systems Development Account.. RESOLUTION N0. 91-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAr AUTNOAI2ING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PAOGAAH SUPPLEMENT NO, 4 TO LOCAL AGENCY STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. STLPP-5420 POR THE STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM POR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 19TH STREET PROM ARCHIBALD AVENVE TO WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE City council Minutes May 1, 1991 Page 4 DB. Approval to ex6euts Program Supplement No. 17 (CO 91-025) to Local Agency - state Agreement No. OS-5420 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of Calitornie for PrelLninary engineering of the Arrow Route Bridge Wldenf.ng nt Cucamonga creek Project - the Supplement oats the Federal portion of the project at $12,966.00 and the City's portion at $2,034.00 with the provision to increase the city's portion should the need arise. Funding for the supplement Agreement shall be fYOm Syateme Development funds. RESOLUTLON NO. 93-114 A R850LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOPNIA, AUTHORIZING TNB BXECUT20N AND SZONING OF PROGRAM BUPPLeMENT NO. 17 TO LO('AI. ar.Rwrv . emx me +-____,- NO. OB-5420 FOR PRELIMINARY SNGINEeRINO OP THB ARROW pROUTe BRIDGE WIDBNINO AT CUCAMONGA CRBBA PROJECT D9. Approval to award and execute an Agreement (CO 91-026) with Investment Property Advieore to provide an update sppraie al for AeaesenWnt Dletrict No. 89-1 (O'Donnell, Armatronq and Pnrtnere - Milliken south of AIYOw), in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). Funding will be advanced by the developer. ^10. Approval t0 execute an Agreement (CO 93-027) with Investment Property Advieore to provide an updated appraisal for Community Facilltiee District No. 88-2 (Etiwanda North Drainage Diatrlet) Ln the amount of Thirteen Thousand Dollars ($13,000.00) from Pund No. 76-3901-8520. D11. Approval to amend Contract No. 87-209 with NB8/Cowry to perform Aeeeeement engineering for Community Facil itiee District No. BB-2 (Etiwanda North Drainage District) for the additional amount of Twenty-Six Thousand, Eight Hundred Dollars ($26,800.00). Funding will be advanced from Aeeeeement Pund No. 76-3901-8520. D12. Approval to amend Contract No. 89-049 with David Taueaig Aeeociatee, Tax Consultant a, fox Community Facilit iea District No. 88-2 !Etiwanda North Orainaga DiaLrictj for an additional amount of Seven Thoueantl Dollars ($7,000.00). Funding will be advanced from Aeeeeement Fund No. 76-3901-8520. D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement security and ordering the annexation to LandeCape MainCenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. L and 6 for Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7451, located on the we et aide of Haven Avenue, south of Wi19on Avenue, and release oP Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security accepted by the City Council on November 17, 1982, both submitted by Corporation oP the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jeeue Chr iet Of Latter-Dfly Sainte. RESOLUTION NO. 91-115 A RE80LUT.I ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP MNCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL 1 OP PARCEL NAP 7451 AND AELEABING THE IHPROVENANT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED City Council Hinutea Nay 1, 1493 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 91-116 A ASSOLUTION OP T'i16 CITY COUNCIL OF TNS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDSAING THE ANNS%ATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANOSCIIPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND STREST LIGHTING MAINTENANCE OISTAICT NOS. 1 AND 6 POR PARCEL 1 OF PAACSL HAP 7451 bi86-FiAy~6N-~Ay$NyS D74. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 9350, located on the noitheest Corner of Baae Line Aoad and Milliken Avenue, submitted by the William Lyon Company. A RESOLUTION OF TIDS CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OP RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT B%TENSION AND IHPROVBN&NT SECURITY POR PARCEL MAP 9350 D14. Approval to accopt Improvement e, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for CUP 88-38, located on the west aide of Haven Avenue between Hillside Road and Garrett Street. Release: Faithful Performance Eond (Street) $74,000.00 ABSOLUTION NO. 91-118 A RESOLUT:Oi: OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.NONGA, CALIPORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC £MPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 88-38 ANU AUTHORISING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D16. Approval to accept the Rochester Avenue Eaet Side Parkway Beeutificat ion Improvement Proi act, Contract Nn. 90-050, located between F_-_..ill Eculsvard and Base Line Road, ae Complete, Extend the Faithful Performance Bond for one year in lieu of a Maintenance Bond, release the Labor and Material Bond and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion". RESOLOTION NO. 91-119 A RESOLUTION OP TXE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPAOVEHENTS POR ROCHESTER PARKWAY BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO BASE LINE ROAD, CONTRACT NO. 90-050, AND AUTHORI2ING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THB WORE D17. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Report and Setting a Public Rearing for June 5, 1991 to levy the annual aeaeeements and approve the Preliminary Engineer's Report for Park and Recreation Improvement District (PO-85). City council Mlnutee May 1, 1993 Page 6 ABSOLUTION NO. 93-120 A RESOLUTION OF TN8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS NITHIN THB PARE AND RBCNEATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-BS) AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE POR PUBLIC HEARING THEREON RESOLUTION No. 91-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH6 CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPOANIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSBSS[~NTS WITHIN THE PaRZ awn vvno,e.T..... I _ -.,,,_ I DISTRICT (PD-85) AND 58TTING A TIHB AND PLACE POR PUBLIC NEARING TAEAEON HOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Duquet to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items D13 and D3, and with the correction ee noted on Resolution No. 91-116. Hot ion carried unanimously, 5-0. k if i;f DZSCURSION OF ITSN D3. Approval of ReeOlutioa No. 91-012D to extend CoecAet cablsvisiaa'• Praneaiu. Couneilmember Alexander stated he and Councilmember Buquet had met with staff regarding ca61e TV end were requesting the Council to make the extension for 90 days instead of 30 days. Councilmember Buquet stated he concurred with this. Mayor Stout asked if negotiations were progree ei ng. Councilmember Huquet stated he and Councilmember Alexander weu'_3 be h:.virq soma follow-up meetinger but stated they would ba coming back to the City Council with an updated et etas report on Comcaet ne9otiatione ae wall ae issues still remaining with other cable companies, and added there might even be a recommendation for pulling a franchise agreement if the matter dose not get resolved. RESOLUTION NO. 91-032D A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, E%TENDING COUNTY OF SAN BHRNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOk 90 3G DAYS VPON EXPIRATION OF WRAENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA i1oTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded 6y Buquet to approve Reeolut ion NO. 91-0120 by amending the extane ion to 90 days instead of 30 days. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. • x • • ,. City Council Minutes Mny 1, 1991 Psge 7 EI. CONSIDERATION TO ESTABLISH A EPBED LIMIT OP 40 NPH ON HIGHLAND AVENUE PROM CARNELIAN STREET TO SAPPHIRE STREET Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, rend the title of Ordinance No. 446. ORDINANCE NO. 446 (second reading) AN OAD INANCE OP TH$ CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OP THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS nN CERTAIN CITY STREETS NOTION: Moved by Buquet, eecondsd by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 446. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. . ~ x F1. D 1991-92 - The adoption of the Final Statement o4 Community Development Objectives for program year 1991-92 and the preliminary selection of projects based on a grant of $518,000.00. Staff report presented by Jack Lam, city Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no reaponee, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Alexander stated he was glad to see the number of handicap accesses provided in the City. RESOLL'T ION NO. 91-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 08JECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF PONDS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT eLOCA GRANT PROGRAM FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1991-92 MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Baguet to approve Resolution No. 91-122. Motion carried unan imouely, 5-0. • r O. PVBLIC HEAAINOS No Items Submitted. • x x City Council Minutes Nay 1, 1991 Page 8 H1. STATVS RBPORT ON Ca9L6 AVAILa9ILITY TO CITY SCHOOLS Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Nenagar. Mayor Stout stated that ae pert of the staff report, in the line extension policy it dues not mention anything other then a dwelling, and asked why the 200 foot lino extene ion policy applied to schools at nl 1. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated that based on input from the Clty~s consultant who drafted the franchise agreement, the concept le ihei any unit or dwelling unit would all fall under this same policy, end added it is e technicality if it ie a eehool or a building, i.a., the Cf..f~ ro..~e., Mayor stout stated h® did not agree with how thin wee written by specifically stating "dwelling unit' and asked for our attorney to look at this. Jamae Markman, City Attorney, stated n dwelling unit is a dwelling unit and he hoe never heard anyone argue to interpret that the phrase ^dwell ing unit" to mean school. He stated he felt they should talk tc Carl Pilnick about this La sue since he wrote the £ranchise agreement. He also suggested t6lking to Bob Rizzo about this elev. Councilmember Buguet stated as long ae he hoe been part of the Cables Subcommittee it was his understanding that the intention ae part of the franchise agreement was that the cable companies would hook up to all of the schools ae part of the public education system. Councilmember Wright asked if the cable companies were making an iaeue about the ZDO foot connection. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City HanageY, stated yes they were in certain situations. crack Lae, City a:aaagar, stated tnat under the circumstances presented, he felt it would be prudent to continue this item until Mr. Markman and Mr. Pilnick could diecusa this matter further. Mayor stout et ated he would like to refer this matter to the Cable Subcommittee, Mr. Hackman and Mr. Rilnick, and 1f a summary closure o£ this matter cannot be worked out, it could be brought back to the Council for further action to make it work. Councilmember Wright stated she felt the echoola were not aware of this and have been nonassertive to get cable to begin with. she added she did net think they ware geared up to do anything with it once they got it. she stated she did not feel the entire blame should be put on the cable companies because she felt they were waiting for the echoola to approach them Eat cablo service, and the echoola have not done this. Clty Council Minutes May 1, 1991 Page 9 Councllmam6er Huquet ateted he felt this boils down to a good faith effort in serving all the uneerv»d areas of the Ciiy and did not feel this was occurring. Ha stated he felt the Clty would need io et art pushing the raquirem»nta of the Franchise agreement. ACTION: Cable Subcommittee, Nr. Markaan and Mr. Pilnluk io investigate the 200 foot line extenalon ieeue and come back to Council if necessary. w,. r•em~ c.. w..,,««ew • ~ S. IDESTIlICATION O~ 2TEN8 !OE NEST MEBTINO No items were identified for the next meeting. w ~ ~ ~C. CONNDNICATIONS PROM TM6 POHLIC K1. sob Coleman, comcaet Cable, stated ha would like to go back and give input regarding item H1, and stated he did not think a school was considered a dwelling unit. Ma ateted the cable companies are not trying to ^rip-off" the coswunity and that they are willing to work with the schools. He stated they are willing to hook up the schools. K2. Hal Berman, Simmons Cable, stated he wanted to note a cox rect ion to the staff report for item H1. He stated Alta Loma Jr. High School would be connected to cable within two weeks. He added that Caryc Sleaeatary School ie not in hie area nor was it in DCA's area. He stated he voluntarily agreed to put the cable into that school. He mentioned there were three achoole in the Etiwanda School District that he would go ahead and nerve at the request of DCA and the City. He mentioned the Stork School hoe been served for five years and now hoe an amplifier that hoe gone out. He stated h» did not know of any school in hie area that was not being served. K3. Clayton Graham, DCA Cable, stated he hee mat with City staff and felt the 200 foot line extension ieeue should be further investigated by staff, Mr. Markman and Mr. Pilnick. He stated he had roet with a school principal last week, and that because of the coat involved, the principal stated he did not want cable service. He stated if a school requests service, he would try to get it in ae quickly ae pose able. Mayor Stout asked Mr. Graham to contact the City with the details of the school that did not want cable service. cLty Council Minutes Hay 1, 1993 9gge 10 councilmamber Wright asked tar the Mayor to send a letter on behalf of the Clty Connell to all of the schools to explain the benat its of cable service. Meycr Stouk naked Jerry Pulwood, Deputy City Maneger, to write the letter for hLe eLgneture. • • a • • . NOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adjourn t0 8xecutlve 6eaaion to die cues personnel matters. Motion carried unanimously, 5-O. The meatinq uJ<.vL.i:.u .... .. Y , ._ _ __ _, .rune •lk ur YvnnuH ve S@a8inn. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: Hay 15, 1991 CITY OP AANCNC CUCAMONOA CITY COUNCIL NINUTES Recular Meeting A. CALL TO ORDHR A regular meeting of the Aaneho Cucamonga Clty 1buncil was held on Wednesday, May 15, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, locnted et 10500 Civic center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to older at 7:51 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembere: Char lee J. Buquet II, Diane Williams, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Hanager: James Harkman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Pulwood, Deputy City Manager; Otto xroutil, Deputy City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner; Jerry Guarzacino, Aeeietant Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Boh 2ettarberg, Puh lic Works Maintenance Managet; Jeff Barnes, Parke/Landscapb Maintenance Superintendent; Gaty Varney, Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Superintendent; Joe Hchult v, Community Services Director; Jim Mart, Administrative Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Officer; Duane Baker, Aeeietant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst lI; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst Ip chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Pite ProCection District; Capt. Bzuce 2einer and Lt. Bob Psppler, Ranc.`.o Cucaaquya Sheriff's Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Cleik. Absent waa: Mayor Donnie L. Stout, was not present ae he was represent in9 the City at the retirement dinner of Judge Aenneth Ziebarth. • • . . . ~ Mayor Pro Tem Alexander called a recess at 7:51 p.m. The meeting reconvened at B:O1 p.m. with all members of Council present (StouC aheenC~. ~ • • x ~ H. ANNOUNCH!¢MTS/PRSSENTATSONS el. Presentation of a Proclamation recogniting May 19 - 25, 1991, as National Public Works Weeks. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander presented a proclamation to Bob Zetterberg, Jeff Barnes and Cary Varney in recognition of Public Works Week. City Council Minutes May 15, 1991 PSgC . 02. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing Bob Psppler for hie service to the residents of Aancho Cucamonga and congratulating him fox hie promotion to Captain. Mayor Pro Tsm Alexander presented s proclamation tc Bob Pepplsr for his service to the City and congratulated him on hie recent promotion to enptain. + . . • . ~ C1. Jan Wilder, 10109 Stratton Court, and Ielamae Huggins, 10203 Haaver creek, thanked Councilmsmber Baguet for testifying for the •Bad Bulldsts" 6111. 6he continued to update the City Council on what was taking plaes with their situation with Narry Stranger. She added a hearing is set Por June i0, and would like aeeietanou from the City Council by someone attending the meeting to help support the homeowners. Councilmember Baguet volunteered to go to the hearing to support the homeowners. James Harkman, City Attorney, stated he had sent a package to the Attorney General's office. Cou nc ilmember Baguet inquired if there would be anything legally wrong with hiss going and teat ifying at the hearing on June 30. ,Tomas Markman, City Attorney, stated he did not see a problem with Councilmember Buquet attending, but did not think ho would get the opportunity to speak unless the Attorney General Deputy makes him a witneae. He added he would contact the Attorney General's office to make eu re he got the original package hie office had sent. He felt it would be a gcod idea for a letter to come from the Mayor's office to let the Attorney General know the seriousness of this matter and how the City feels about it. Counc ilmember Buquet suggested James Markman make contact with the Attorney General's office to get a feel Eor the eitustion, and if necessary, another copy of all documentation could be made. Mre. Huggins et ated she did not feel Mr. Tagliano of tt~e Attorney General's office was very familiar with the total issue and the problems involved. Counc ilmember Buquet stated he would like for Mr. Marlusan to set up a meeting with Mr. Tagliano to stress the importance of the problems. James Markman, City Attorney, stated if he waa successful in setting up a meeting, he would have Jerry Grant, Building official, accompany him with any necessary information. C2. Mark Solomon, 914 Placer, Ontario, and also doing business in Rancho Cucamonga, urged the City Council to build a skateboard facility. City council Minutes May 15, 1993 paryg 3 C3. Richard Martz, 8745 Lurline, st atsd he wanted to complain about the City's regulations on towing of vehicles. Ha related to the Council the vehicles ha has had parked at hie house and the citation he had recently received, and also about a vehicle that had been towed away. Ne added the vehicle that had been towed had been recently axrved, and that he did not knew why Lt got towed away. He asked that someone come out from the City eo he could show them where he would like to park hie vehicle on the east aide of the house and also to find out if that would be acceptable. Jack Lam, Clty Manager, suggested he talk with Captain Zelner of the Rancho Cucamonga Pollee Department to work out this problem. C..,,,•,,..uAmw.r nuquec sexes tnaL a summary follow-up occur regarding this problem. Cd. Jack Lam, city Manager, asked the City Council for possible budget workshop dates. The counctl concurred June 13 would 6e a day that all members could nttend if that would ba a good date with Mayor Stout also. ~ . « . „ D1. Approval of Minutes: Msrch 27, 1991 (BUquet absent) April 3, 1991 April 17, 1991 (Wright absent) D2. Approval of Warrant e, Register Nos. 4/24/91 and 4/30/93 and Payroll ending 4(25/91 for the total amount of $1,479,100.07. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule ae of April 30, D4. Approval to designate the Magic Lamp Restaurant (formerly Lucy and John's Cafe), located at 8189 Poothill Boulevard, ae an historic landmark. RESOLUTION NO. 93-123 A RESOLUTION OF TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDM.ARA DESIGNATION NO. 91-01, THEREBY OESIGNAT ING THS MAGIC LAMP RESTAURANT (FORMERLY LUCY AND JOFDQ•S CAPE), LOCATED AT 8389 FOOTMILi BOULEVARD, AS AN HISTORIC LANDMAIiR D5. Approval to designate the Nosenzo-Smiderla House, located at 8068 Archibald Avenue, ae an historic landmark. City Council Minutes Hay 15, 1991 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 91-124 A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OF THB CZTY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFOAN IA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDM7IAR DESIGNATION 91-02, THBASBY DESIGNATINO THE NO86NZ0-EMI DEALS HOU68, LOCATED AT 8068 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, A$ A HISTORIC LANDMARK D6. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the contract (LO 91-018) for repairing the low voltage irrlgat ion wiring for the street landscaping on Victoria Park Lane, to Landscape Webt, Inc. of Anaheim, Cal ifornie, in the amount of $73,600.00 to be funded by Landscape NAinienance Aeseaement District No. 2, account number 41-4130-7043. D7. Approval to execute Relmburaeagnt Agreement for Undergrounding of overhead Utll ltlee for DR 87-09, located on the southwest eornei of AYYOW Route and Rochester Avenue submitted by Schlosser Forge Company, UR-12. ABSOLUTION NO. 91-125 A ASSOLVTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ABIMBURSBHSNT AGREEMENT S%ECUTBD ON APRIL 17, 1991 POA UNDBAGROUND ING OF A PORTION OF OVERHEAD UTILZTI65 I.OCATSD ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE A:lD ROCHESTHR AVENUE DS. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Ag[eementr improvement Security antl Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Dietzict Nos. 1 end 2 for Tract 13114, located on the eoutheaet corner of Vineyard Avenue end Celle Del Prado, submitted by Bayeun Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 91-126 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO WCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECVRITY AND PINAL HAP OF TRACT 13114 AESOLOTION NO. 91-127 A RESOLUTION OF THH CITY COUNCIL OF TXE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OPDHAING TH& ANNE%ATION OF CERTAIN THARITOAY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STABHT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13114 ^9. Approval to accept improvement, release bonds and file a Notice of Completion for Tract 13304 located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive. Release: Patt hful Performance Bond (Street( $105,380.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street) $ 10,538.00 City Council Ninutea Nay 15, 1991 Page 5 RESOLUTION No, 91-128 A ABSOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIPORNIAr ACCBPTING THB PUBLIC INPROVBNBNTB POA 13304 AND AUTNOAIEINO THE FILING OF A NOTICE OP COHPLBTZON POR TFffi WOAA D30. Approval to zeleaae Mnintenance Hond for Tract 33476 located on the northeast Corner of Neuman Avenue and Tryon Street. Relaaaet Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 22,300.00 nn. a.~-...._•_ _- _n~c.. ,:oiu~enance aorta for Tract 12870 located on the north alas of HLgAland Avanua between Eeet Avenue and Btiwanda Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (street) $ 77,400.00 D 12. Approval to seleeee [ieintananca Bond fot Tract 12642, 12935-44 interceptor levee and channel located at the eoutheaet Corner of Rochester Avenue and Highland Avenue. Aeleaee: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 8,400.00 D13. Approval to nccept Lmprovemente, release Mnintenance Guarantee Bonds for Tracts 13542 and 13542-3 locnted on the northeast corner of Banyan Street and Canietel Avenue. Tract 13~ Aeleaee: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 22,OCO.C0 Tract 13542-3 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 48,000.00 Banyan Lardecace Aeleaee: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 2,830.00 D14. Approval to accept improvement e, release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13561 located un the eoutheaet Cotner of Netherlands View Loap and Vintnge Drive. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 10,300.00 D15. Approval to Yeleaee Maintenance Bond for TYaCt 12642, 12935-44 major streets, located on the eoutheaet corns[ of HLlllken Avenue and Banyan Street. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (,Major St rests) $207,600.00 City Council Hinutea May 15, 1991 Page 5 D16. Approval to ralaeaa Maintenance Bond for Paeeel Hap 8617 loeatsd on the acutheaet corner of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street. Release: Haintenence Guarantee Bond $ 28,800.00 D17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Exisnaion foY Tract 12620 located on the northwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 6th Street submitted by Rencho Park Venture. RESOLUTION NO. 91-129 A RESOLUTION OP TH8 CITY COUNCIL OP TNB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr CAL1PVRn1n, nrenG~i::v :: .... ..owwvm BXTENSION ANO IMPROVBlOSNT SBCURZTY POR •TMCT 12420 ' D18. Approval to execute Improvemen[ Agreement Extension for Treeta 12820 and 13727 located on the southwest corner of CarnelLan Street and Highland Avenue, submitted by Southland Development. ABSOLUTION NO. 91-130 A RESOLUTION OF THB CITY COUNCIL OP THS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVRNRNT ACA86lgNT EXTENSION AND IMPROVBMBNT 68CURITY 8OR TRACTS 12820 AND 13727 D19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13270 located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Church Street, submitted by Lewis Homes. RESOLUTION N0. 91-131 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVII:C IMPROVEMENT P.GREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13270 020. Approval to vacate a portion of an alley located west of Malachite Avenue and south of Foothill Boulevartl and setting the date of public hearing toz June 19, 1991. RESOLUTION NO. 91-132 A RESOLUTION OF THS CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COllNTY OF SAN BEANARDINO, CALIPORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AN ALLEY LOCATED WEST OP HAI.ACHITE AVENUE AND SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent ~. ~ ~ . « . ~ City Council Ninutea Nay 15, 1991 Page 7 No ite:oe submitted. R • R R E1, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - To define and establish development cYlteria fOr recycling uses within the industrial Area specific Plan. Staff report presented by Jerry Guarrscino, Assistant Planner. Mayor Pro Tam Alexander opened the meeting for public haarlnq. Thera being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No, 447. ORDINANCE NO. 447 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF TH6 CITY COUNCIL OF TIffi CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-02, BSTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR RECYCLING COLLECTION AND PROCESSING, AND FAI(I NG FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Roved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to waive full readin.9 and set second reading for June 5, 1991. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout). R • • R f 6. PUBLIC REARINOS No items submitted. . : R . • + E• CITY NANACER'B BTAPF RBPOATS H1. STATVS REPORT ON SAN BERNARD NO GANG AN DRUGS TASK FOR S PROPU D ACQUISITION OF ITS COMPVTEA EQUIPMENT Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager. Councilmember Williams stated she would like Council consensus on how she and Councilmember Wright ehou ld vote on this matter for the next Gang and Cruge Taek Force meeting ae Far as computer equipment, and also if the Council ie still interested in participating in the program. Councilmember Wright stated the Taek Porca was not changing what wes originally proposed, but now it was n question on how the City wanCe to implement this program in Rancho Cucamonga. city council Hinutse Hay 15, 3991 Pegs e Captain Zeiner, Police Department, wanted to clarify that on page 132 there are thirteen agencies that have contrlbuted 55,000.00 or more. He stated there were two members from the Board of Supervisors who hove also contrlbuted 55,000.00 which were not listed along with the thirteen cities. He added one of the members wantetl io be sure that someone in the County received the benefit of that hardware should the money be spent for that particular option. He atated when all the money was put in one pot, there was not enough money to fund flttsen computers, and now they are bnck to square one. He eteted what 1t looks like ie some promisee ware matle that now cannot be kept. He felt this was a vary worthwhile eyetem, and felt it would greatly benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino. Ha thought it would be an appropriate expenditure of asset seizure money. Councilmember Wright eteted same time between 1989 when this concopt was approved by the Council and the last Taek Porce meeting, things had changed whereby the computer eyetem was not included in the 55,000.00 amount paid. she atated St was a false assumption on the City's part and felt other cities had this acme false assumption. Councilmember Baguet suggested in-house city staff work On the purchasing of equipment in order to get n better deal because of their expertise. He atated ha would like to see the Bubcomnlttee working with the Taek Force to sae to it that this eyetem would be available to petsonnel working in the field in cyder to obtain important information. Captain Zeiner, Police Department, atated that was discussed et the last meeting, and it was agreed that once the eyetem was up and running they would explore the eyetem being expanded to Eield personnel. Councilmember Will lame et ated what they needed to know waa will the City of Rancho Cucamonga be providing in-house equipment. ::uyor Pro Tar ;,lexandar opa~iad the meeting for public conment. Addressing the City Council wee: Phil Guthridge, fi564 Etiwanda Avenue, atated ho did not think the correct information had been provided to the Council, and felt there were additional charges relating to this. tie added he would like to see this matter delayed in order for him to obtain all the necessary figures and information for this project. Councilmember Wright suggested he needed to be talking to the Taek Force Committee Executive Board, and/or Chuck Terrell. There being no further response, 4he public comment section was closed. Counci3mem6er Williams reiterated they were not asking for more money for the program, but whether or not the City wanted to have its own in-house computer for the program. City Couneil Minutes Nay 15, 1991 °aqs 9 ACTION: The Council concurred to go Ponnrd with the program with tha usa of tn- houee computer equipment. f i f H2. CONSIDER TION OP SOL TION OP S PPORT POA THE CITY OF LbS A. GSLBS' EPPOATS WITH THB U.S. C6NSU6 BURBAD RESOLUTION NO. 41-133 A RESOLUTION OP THB CITY COUNCIL OP TNS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIIORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF THE YFPORTS OF THY CITY n. .._ _____~_ _, ~ -, nnYwam av wIUNSSS THE POPULATION UNDERCOUNT BY TH6 UNITED HTATE6 CBNSUS BUASAU NOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Nri9ht to epprove Resolution No. 93-133. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). No items submitted. • a • • • j COUNCIL 6U BIN666 • • M • 1 # J. IDBNTIlIGTION O! ITYNS MR NBZT IO:ETINO No items were itlentif led £or the next meeting. • . • • • . E. CO!41VNIGTIONS FAON TH'a PUBLIC Al. Ray Stuehrmen, 12440 Lily Court, elated that he had previously been assessed a 510.00 charge for landscape maintenance, and felt the work was not being done to maintain the landetepe. He asked if ewoething could be done to get batter service for maintaining the landscaping. Counc ilmember euquet et at ed he felt it should be identified to Mr. Stuehrman what the ;10.00 assessment covers, and also felt it was unfortunate that Mr. Stuehzman had to call to get service. Jack Lam, City Manager, suggested that Hr. Stuehtman meet with him ana Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Hanager, to die ca se the entire landscaping maintenance issue. + s • • • e City Council Minutes lfay 15, 1991 Page 30 NOTION: Moved by Nright, seconded by Nilliame to adjourn to May 3Y, 3991, 7:U0 p.m. in the Raina Aoom for s joint mwting with the Riatoric Prewrvation Commiesian. Motion carried unanimously, 6-0-j (Stout absent). The aNreting adjourned at 9:19 p.m. Respeetfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, IXC City Clerk Approved: < u_ :NP I UJwe Vel OS;O iW0 •00 -NW o.N. L JW F ~ ~u E ..E E V• ~~ •~ iii N11< \~ ~ •• \~-11 N•<11 O•;• ~ ~ i ~ F• 01 ~~ • -~O~ •!• ~w• •<~ •;~ i • •w• •F• iu• N~ i0~ ~W~ •n• ~W •Z •2 •Y •e iW O O P O N MONOO O O O NNN•00000.0 nN1001N000 • O O NiNiO O O ONrV00•NOgO NNOnOn•ONn • O PM O NN~10N O n00.OOInOwO fNPMa4•-i• M • 1 nP N • OilnN F N nNOO MN000 •N NNO N}N N n Y <nrP N N O N ryryN Nnn NO q N• i N • N N V •n N N N N n II .\ A /1 /~ ^ A n N I\ N N L M q N H w p A n r\ .~ n N • • • • • •• • • ••••Y • • • •M•••1••=•• JONf•N~Iy ~N~yy^N^ NNOrO<NNNOOOrNNNN 1.•00JNNVN1Ma• ynNINVMwNONN•A~• W~$S00"fi ~11q:S::AFO:iii:8:i:.»xN«G.AARdr«A1Sn~».-.rwn+a rli •Pi ~.IF« ONNNY•iNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNM Y _ W 1 w I 1 1 1 1 1• 1• 1 1- 1 I N - i 2 W r 1 w w L h^ q 1i}N N• M N N\ V i<i N V O ^ N<WN N N O N O NNL J •OYO WYN w N i ~ O qJw- N O j O ~ LUWV iNW O! O • ^ • • V• n „ M N S NS W NNY O „ N • N N NON• N N N NNN iWO}M} }Nt • N O liN L N w wVYYY Y \ i -y N ~- i• WYW O W N i 1; pY} \ J •NLN • \ M V V VJV V V V V y V r V i 2 2 } Y W {V W W N v V V V'J VYNV V v N~~V VNV \ Lwa<Y YVY i L W V V VLVNNV N IVpVNV\V~U yNJN<UL VF u L O 11 1x31 roIOLZ e e .1 J7 WUiIVrW w i w IYiI iW \ N O WL W N• Ol O L iJM N i JL \ N N! •I `\ L !fN•!~J N L W OL O H NiYYp 2 • w WO •• •N \yN YtiJ O W O LN YV` WOO elVYrUJ~ Yi\ wNY JW S\ \ SN r p` N:NNN W W<N W`N••U r 1 • N JY • Lf}W O_ F ^ 1 1!_r9w N~a O NS O_ O J l0 O rJOWIi• < fO1i10• j1{N OyM yJ~Owi 2 ` 2 w<fN 1 p ~ • OWW11 Wi OSW NNLNWW N r~ N W Vr L WN~~wVV>[iU Y en •[N W ~ i4rJa w W N awl Sseesse Y<r JtJL: O V O• Y> O }yr< V V YS-NM•NN•WL Y20 Op O N w• • 4MY W W M pNNi}}p.r}} O • eW< y w L ~OJaW S 2 \aOWgO<•O•W •WL a~YSOi U O V r NN y ~ V V t NOOW1•}}1xM <J NOV• 1 ~ J JOOrO w 1 Q6 YQ JVr •N4M O O O JJ O 4 N•1NNJ O ff} rON;2WWLwM i4WN ri i O N O< iV O L O<W<i O~ ~O-P«WW~WO WY;WC•JJWJ • } > a } < SJO9W ~ f V ONIrVVWYVSL WlNw•~iLSL u O i W w U z : e .. W < O V V N N N 2 O f •I N W i y M O 1! < W W JY ~ IL R2 ~ w O ~ J !~ } qM LJ O O U WL WY ^ W V w Y wU N • F NO x • wM0 Nr Oy i S SOWO f N SJ <t; iNW iMN Nr0< V y lJ } N NSSiW O f p p W WWr WWVW MV2J u i rV Y O OOSNO f N N OV fO~YdfV~ lxYw~ wiWL W V YW < U V<lfW M • Si taW001 f JiLNN<VrWW V 2 Y FO 1 i fi •MO J i NS iFSJJ •<O WNOVOWLO<~ q L N < W W W N • •` O O. O O V V L • 0 . 0 . 2 y 4 y 4 N N W f f J~ : O aa4~L w f Y :W<FS W12iHMf fYWJii-JO00 V ? < JW < < •<LJO < j }N<V~==:`N VJyVVJNNNN N> U i i iJ ; N NNNU< a U f ~fZ)xx<WWS•O ••«<•••~• N O V< r O Mq0 O! N N'Pirrr<NN rOwrfOPNn q O -N n m-NM• NOOOINN O•NVa • N• N N NNN N N N •NVNNNnNNN N rN M U u L 0 F V iNw ~~S U~1 o1e za 00 owW JL F V ui ~Z \• E :°N.Nioi.°+ei°ei~wii s.N.~e°e°o°~i o°e° OOmONOVNJNONhtluN N_N N•NmwtlON Nr.NN NtlNyNyN„nmbN NNNONUPN NN0000• JNONOOu re:y.°. .°.r \1Y •1 •a oI WI ~~ DI a~ f IwI I I r I w i I I I I I •[• •iI •i• J ON•NONNnVNNhmNONNMVNaLNNNIMVNNNOMNAVMmNONNNVN'1hNP0 YNP N NJYJNw ~nA^TNNn W NN„MMRRRRRRRtR stn wwlNiw w'N=nlNn w+Tiwwnn~l~iw NinNNNnwnnll~i n~lsiX~~~Ix nli"n O NNNNNMNNNNNMNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNPNNNNNNNN V•W m i • N i lam NJ 1• V lZ i s Z V N NZ\ N N me N o • a n NPhNnw L N N NNS W N N bNNNNr 2 • hNW W• N MNi NN N • \ \ NfWi iN V YZf NmhY00 P::Y NfZ Z 'JY hNM \ VNNV O O N \n/IM N `JV OW IN y2n NnNnf \NV V NN>VO • Wn\mmS NaV NOn N:i 1 •• byw VnW N hV ::NJ ~aY ^: : s:WN.hjL~nY: L awh \ n• Nwn WmrszNNaQ J yM NNiiNfY\Z O\w~NimmW\\J uZwY\1•\w>f\N J\MYVM`4rV\.fn /N1 yUO •NnN JnrfONMiIVNVN u1yVS=OW61°WW~ ~WrPS•YhOf W\~ tLP__ •rJ V •ZZ Lr ~e~ Du N ILw• •M~~ao~ N VNNu w .NWWWNi rJm a~Vw•f ViJJf hWWmVWOODJNi NOJO••~OJJ N~ V OVJNOrV_OVmf OfV .[.W[~;~O~YeYwVOi DSOIOwVi° JisiOraW[?PrJNVI .~r~y30niJ7 aDr006u6rfmrJaf• rrlLhmJ \~t N.VO D.i(N ifa~OrLm•MiJtOJ~>it n i ~ O V . h w Si N • N NV SE i T t0 2iNWi NN O mV _ r{6 YfY1>L >yW iWyL1. /.N OS i Y OYWUii10J WfFJWWRROW NLJFJWMYVI hiJO'l1 IL>p1 MLt IibJN9NW ~~°~ uiNPiaZ~~WiW~t •\ZNO •S LN..YhN .ii •a Nri1i •D Wase 01tlWIJN mIW• WYiNMW OJWOrmWNN mf YSN~aiVN m »ff llfmWWWWUJJO0i7pJrlmlf ff0000aDOmmO°Nm•O.OOOUVUVY NwVh N rN eV\FWVM 'P\~ P nV h2WZi VIV.I \.ii '~i~J Wh: • isii.°i i L. {ZOW N OJ ~ ~orLb Mm!° OOWO NiN~f N6 W~~mW WN UIWWY NNJFD>O ZJeOZ yNVZaWU ZWVWZ ~ONON WVNrW 2 Via NN DWJJWLW if.Ny hsr~y sDZ mu JNtrJVH ZNONZ OOOnN YZirNOOeaNON wN1• OVOONONPNn OImN NONONUN• V •• J N w N M n N N 1• m W N N LOW \ n aNZ w\f \ YMV N ZaOItl1 W V ZW WOwbOOL .~N\m.mW z.Wlon°=ar ~i i aisi~No WNL=i+W W ~WMi<NVNN WyNiNf Lif ~wJM~N NV1wNUWWJ TO V 00{01 NfN(N ?L9N >hmOWnri PVUDf°6SVU W hM1 N° f V z ou D °`~ r ~ M LO V _ W VN Vh0 •N V1 V Wi hLV J aNf z si. iaW u r u9i f W W V • i fWWZ NUSIW> hJrR. r yVy11WW ~fN@iG° IWmlril SJJD° VVVUVVu Wires NIWi. J WWm~N ~\OZW DD°0° UVVUV Ns ~~ VhV IeuPNN i1VSe OOCf ON IN• 1>V~°wmlVm =NNh>taJmV u r V Op0000°D NOOP..O n•DbNONtlNPhbOmONNmmDVOOVP MNVN NnPTN00> mNO nNNemlem° mO OP• n mrNrvll MNUNNn JmNNP NN NN uwINN nNNM N n NNN NN N NM MN c i i e E tNP `1 ~:e rN =y0 iLL0 OjL J W i• i ii OONOOOOPOOOOOONOa00000a000awONOONNrpNNONO00rOOO0 ONPONnOmOOw000NO000wOnNOONOODOnONgPYM1aPi000iON0000 NPNwON nNNniwMONOgONgONaNNN=gNwNNraaONNOONO_ grymwmN:wwONiOwa PNMryNa00„O lOw:nNNNPN mm rr N Nn N w• w wr w w r a irNNaNaNaPawNmaNaNmP'wryman a..aPerNmaNilePawNNaNawgPew nnnn}wNlnm FFFFfi:IXA RAR n mNmNNmA$RRRRQFt'.tA•NAlnRFmlm'ASS$ NNnNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNMNMNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNN ONNNnnNNN NNNMNNNNgNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN a O LLPrL i f_J aY L{ a• a "N rf i0 «W l a W Ji1 XN J w bi a N\ WI\11 J O M i Oi PP YA =a N \ iN N i0 O S O Y YPN N= Ni N OJ 1 N^O 6„ O Nb o oa uaq N iq al_ ~ \ z Zii 2 Y P} L V „ O! l aFOV iW aL \rNM• Vr 2 iN0 M P Nr i 7W Oa SLf} .. fwNZ uli \ N~~ir J r ~~ rLif SYiNV : Nii NP ~rMJ Si JN ~ Vi M M V~L •Ir FN Vwoll }OLI Ir71 L o• WYZL Yle w :~ s` ~w! \ \ fL' IN zsNeuoal P i=yOl JaF_OOwN W{Nlry W W W NUywWaZFW J•1 :a WNYW M ^OP = N NryPi~ Uiw WiiNN=aNLW V \rrl \W JWWN NiNJ •~ a% i rm ilVly NNJL NiNNaLO YN YOrr„rfiLIIJlr L WWIY fVjW NWw iaN NLOIw _ _ ZiVLWL fLVfa Iw ~aLN~LJtYaWLallaWilJ J IL• NSJnIONMMw2W rLyJ •a OJO=fiLNN:INNN Va M irNair ynN• Da Ji WOI NVaZMiiiN W:yi• M W NWSyW JiaL y i LWJrWDN rOOUMhIJJwLILL~WJ Jw NOfiZwONi•li'JY O~~O~OMW ~N Lr_JNittii•Li:WVVOWOOJwYiV VOVyu~aiW7E0`af `WgSJ`~aD •NV tlOYNM MNVOw wi 2YlWmriWr2iaSV~iNVV}LVaONwOLwNf ffii LLLNY•i1UwaYSylJLLWOMOiOiL~iW~Nw~SL•SiOYOiW~MDUI~•iiO~li i fWlaJr WNwW WIyyfLWVOWaOW~2WJ~rf 2frWLfOOaWOf iO O YJ600LiOFLMwYNii6iNiNVNViPyaNraL JiLMO2MiOW lOIiNIOV u z .. ~ Iru 2 N _y 1. O y U n r 9 V rY W _ pp N y y ie~ E Lf y U y :NV ~y .2 :_ SO Ou Z 2 W p ~~Jr if_ir ob2 Nwi JJ r i U •Oq~ VN VO ZVO NNMO LiWr • N MW O} J W •O i :i i •• ~U NfS2a V ~iINY! N J OiN L•W= M_O OO_ N iiW OfiW2 • ~_• SJOrJWV VL~N NO Y w :O YVNMiO 1L `~OIN :~• wiJir rf~WW SM n m.YW. @ «.. :.~5 Y..Y WP J 1tw VFw2ww MO •W •W_W_aNLVMY}NOJi OiNOW Wfy~aZWw20f •L•r ~JV if• J } 20• •• Sy rLiOWWJVDa• ZSN ryOMfN`W JfOOU• iJ}~ N• w29NOY L f20i WOVfO •ifw Sif2YF f2YW1wNt~iO •S NMraJI riO •Si W_if uYw•F iMLWOiVJWJWWwOWIF JNViOVi Jf OViFiWwigia~VNrUW2N LN NSJJVLLNJJOWirYO2faiJOWV2NFVJJYNapUOVJVWmOi6wFrJ IOJONNiffW rJOOif rOFfff OOOOOr SSi •f IWOWrrIJ OOOWWWWWWWWWPiIYLLYWLLLLNVVVi2T2TTSiSSZMMrN9'l l9lV1[VVY OONiNNwnrvpON000n NrOimPaPrmMOwmMpNaTOPeaOwOwmOMmmhrP m0 OOONrPOaPOnIN 000PmNOry VM NNOOOOFNmnn n NnNmN NIrrJJrN wNr rf •aN NNn N• NaNrNNNN Z N Vi0 Vi^ BOO t00 ONb V b i i i •; r vi iri Jii• \~ \• Nii z~ o~ i z• e• m ip: iii YYi Yi \i• • ~ ~ i i • ; •O iwi iui iNi •P• •F• i i i i •1• •i• •O• PTOOPOMnON00000>POTNOOho•~nOnNOehmOn•wOmN000aTNN0 NOPTOOPNThaIwONr•NU••O_TnONTPOnOTPa00 T.~NOPPmO•MOOamNha wPTTMPafOON ryMNNePr awNNmwNNP OPTawaNOONhyNTrn..n a w «wi .. .. win JNn•NOhOPO••NN•NanOPONNNiNahOPONNmfNOhOppJNN•NOYPNO••N W$Y$$3$$$ NN Nn.vNmmTnTnTTTn SS2317$i NNNnnxnnn•NnnnnnwnnnnNwnw.f•lann~ainnv..f•wllsi„=nTNNNNNNN ONnNNnNNNNnMNNMNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNnNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Z _ W> O •O • 00 O O ii m > = N O OY n • MZ Mi• i NP N ' > N V Ut O Nn W< N:• O 1 J{ Z u W ~ n^ZN N >{y T 00 N Op h N O Oi Y OYOYI•mfJ IiiWJI iY \ S OW • JZnmJN O iVObi iN0 V •• P u :p • ONUC••VV \ WYO UNPiY A N W \ N J PI i>O YNO!> O V\ t y W O N O w a•'•Y MO WN O I NSwIJW V\Nli f •• N O>i • i NFMN i JJ ia0 Nl J ` „OV wpb i NO n LLWf ZiJmMWNY\••OWIW WNbVY •w OV i UiiNZ JmWaWYFmVYNMeOw NIyiV ON O fine r > YV FWWLLVrW by Z{W lJiJWiOMNY WJS W ZOJ awY• LL •i ffM UWIa • >yi`fOi:06 JO •NWOmW• iV00>60• W m nfrJ i~W~ W ie i OJT IJiw10>NN Jna NNV Y J1lJ >OV N70Y=QN b OOON• JNYJNWOOWwOOV OUi •>IL O•J>OW M~uMJN V> Ib ZOVN YWNWN•OSZVO VS > uZYNWOY ZV IM 20bM i'~ h~ Oahe Of >NO JDfi_O N_r ~ $•VOO ~ne~ NNWrWiNe > OY SJiiW bObLLYn Jbe• • >aW WYWf ObVNJ• ~ OWOOiWm~00WwN SON J OOyimOWJN~Gi ihMOnO~ Z mWebbN • i~fY W WN WWWLL•iN \ V OfY i W•O 7W V9PM hOehZ WALL Nm~ >Z N1i`W>NJiifNWYO FVVNii^NO • FYU•• VM NJVN OJW JYOf d•J f[ ONai n•aZNr• aW ZZFJwnnwmiVY OiiYNFiV{WVONZrWa i••NOY •NWO •nbfYNNiJN00 OJYYJirNWiJ~YZNiYFiOpV>W.•i FYVNwiUni JOOMWNYn SIYI 9••tlZO1 WIiiNarZFO2JMfYOpY ObZZOiirO~JhW>biW{i0 aNZ~~eV~Yt>NAtiiiV~Vibi+•JbZrNaiwOVVOVNVO••{iWOOVNUV~ Z W ni Z r r iW • m VOw NO ~ JVh ~ SON iV ~I WM F N O aU} VW ~Y PZ ~OV N i O VNi V wW •O Z iN Wb• Z J YJr 6 OHO J i~ W y a V30V Z N v a_ J• r w •J N ZO iNZ NN•.W F: OfJ •ZN N W NUJVJO O~Zf SOV14MVhi••O W• NV Z NCWWWNV Z JVUVJU {NOFVZNFiObFVVW •Z VuJ70r~h V >ViiWWN WWN :i u ..N.rWwrirr~i yr~:=pYOr $C W fJ~NNVNVYOdra ilrw'Ji60iW>6uVFYmJZZ~JYSV OY O ONJVYOOZiV 7WFi `{00 VYJWOb{WbZJNb reW>bJO Z1jUNWiO Wee aZmw OZO .O ZW>mWNWNa •••F OeZfNN •• ZiW •Vrr7 O• ••JVUYiFJJJNfY V>6ZZEiF pNWaJZV r: FVN>\O iVW!{{V bf9{_t_a__ NJ• ~OOOr W F • Z• i •a W__••mJJO NpY Z• Vt ~ JZwNJ• NNNY 6VUZZ •r•w •U YV Ni1 yVMZOJONfFVWJ{N•OiMVYZVtli••/WOWWUmiLL YHZ mNOiJW OVNi>VNi.iO {NZFNmN>JCFnNNVZI VVNiNl.nbtONr » JuiOr » ZO{frOOY>{UVWWWNOOOOf as as ••OZNiaa wWWWr0000m Y•[JJJJJJJiZZZiZiZZiiZiiiZiiOOObP6666Yb)6666>f006Zi0 OTmnNOINOfONraONTOamNhanNd•NmnNNNNmNaanNNNONN n nram ... nN•« rvwf rvwrnNm+i~•Nin N NNni°o~MNrvNN rNN« Nn u_ iNp aS! VOI YZO X00 e.N.a J Y \ OOepOOa NO ONNOOaDOee0eNN00NO0a000wPO000YaN eooeoeweew eO NeeNaNeoawoemeeaaNeneerNwrhoweeNhhr ~~a ONa00wnhN00000NPNNMNOpOOPpO000rppNaPN NpNNO.wiw• •ONOw OOnIOrOwNNOaaPNONPNOOaNaAN• h NaN N P N N O.. w wOpN p wN N w NN O N N n N N 1.1 N w N Pt \• N~< W \ N MOFONOJNNaOwONNAaNONONOMNNaNOMOPONNNaNOPONONNNONO n• NMNN wPwwPpwww $iSia•aa3133SYSiiiii'a iiiiS33SSS3333iaaaaaa+•aXS.R StNRr. NNNNMNNnNNNnnNNNMNNNNNNMNNNMMNNNNNMNNNNNNMNNwwNNNNN <~ i• 'J• •i• ~S~ 10• •O• LL Ilui` Y O Z Y Y F NYO JN \ iWi VZ< U WVl tit NN SM WWJ JOi\ iW\NJ\OYY JMWWfWV\~OY YOWU__W Wi /1 ) O<i\NN Of000 J;JOOJJWNOO aif iissWS: • WOrf}} ~:h\JF\;isY uh `wi.<•r~~NN f06N000<JJ u• usuNUu ` u < i .. ' ~ 8 O V < \ O N O < O u Ju e » es o V N ; V V o(i Z Z Wi Wb Y• fON .: YH i "3: W~ 'u 5'68 SYN ZO <O • < F O N Ni< ») ZJ YYN V 1 ni \ Z i I NO Wf M ZWZ»Y • :N>V<iF\F r O> V )l0 F FO NMaOM JON SM VMUO<) O> WZONVi1LY O OV N V h ;OIYY Zo»JYYi JWW••i JNF„ JW_FWhWrOJ N N J<~ !Y <Y W O\ N• Z O.1>FVi ..l C IfW•O •OZ•>i~~w •YO }>UO» •i i ZO• Zr<O WSJ<ZWt ZF~» JN3WiOW>WN»iiiOJ ` iiOMYfW VVO i FWi i«In>Y 7W> WWJWUWW N «V\< aF<O V>« M •J •• }• VS N» tFF •f J ~JWt •VO ZV wNJ l1U• w~iiNWZiV Z<` VOWi en UYNJ JM NN• JJ •ZW YsJZOONN •W10 OZZO><YZi ~>i~~'oZVW ZYWOOiiO>ZZ< WSWrNWOVi« »NNVOW~W•W>FWWW FOM •W< i } VJUMFFU VUMF\)fJ JWYIiFiZ Vi )rj FY•.F»JJY• O )OOiNaWw<»r J}WWZJZ)JJOONZaM»ZNM\ ZYJZNNNJJJJWY YwiNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNN~'nhh»MF>FhhMr00i » >i2iZZZiZZiMN rraOTaOPNPOM NrNPiOhnNJOp..NNO..YwpNhONONO0Il0 .•NNa aNNn1F0 NaNN ONNNwNO• OhONONaNn10 NMNPnNn NNN NNNrNN r N NNNNrNNw NNN .• NN NMnNN N NNNN S •2• IZ• ;1 O 00 O N i YO N i ill°1 ~ u r N•ri r O Fyy Z Y 1 O F' V N N N ~O W Yew W OW O W~ •i u i YOM1F ~}\ iWN~W JM V LY J ZiUY N Y LVi ZMVIO Ya V OhW1L J WW N YZJ~FNV)•;J WV 1 WfOLL r V>1 NW~tN Y ~FNYO iwWWr; V;F .tf .f ZJW : ZWOa>PONNVVW O N>O» > V><N •i J F.1 O Win O <yiy• U F\N a >N\N• JO;F OFYF1 w j10VOOWZrN~ iNWJ wY •\WWWW•Jf{\{NUZV\ Z hLLWO>NFJV ZVwWN FM WWi00N1.OhYNZOiL I NOrWJ >MZa WF aY iOVfV>• ZJ;IZraf\N} aNONCYJwYf~~WWZ00>OJ1•f>iJWWiiV~ZO\Nh•N N„Y OiW<JM\~W •\F~h \<OM`F NWViMWFZIi a i"o \siWiorf\ a;~ u i eWOfWWU}uaWShfNN'sef of\We>w o 'oJ~ ; w~WNW \i• ;>O;O • YNO IZOW>OZO\FWNM Ih W>O•Wi OV•4 •Fa MOWNOVW\OWiNNO wN:)±JI=NWfrYV ywVl OiFVNNyOWi~Vf a\OW ~ fif »f •hNWN :War \s» W aJ•a NN Nfa N NNrFFFhVZNJFUJ}PwrhZJ>JJiFIaWi 1 YNNtOV A NI yZyZZiOw<eZOJLLM<iNWeO~JJ~JYieVJVyM{•J•NwryN • a~ViV\V~~YY~OY}.<NNY~OVM`LYhJ\N~[;SLJalrt E ;9 wE V• ~i • 1 I 1 •• O O b O O• YMMO.OOONipOwO0YNO01p•OyON•PNONNwOVONN •i; O • e e • •• nVZYN iNeIpeONVap<ONNa000iVni0lNNiN••ON• wif• • .~ •n o e'w i~w~•:wwew i,o err.+~wl:w~w ssi •~•ii•iwriiro~•iew „• • ^ N > w h V~ •N•NVVNw•YwOn•wVNnPNwNr±ny i•PJ•whn^>N •W• pwPwn NNrpMVFPO = N hn \•i• N q N r w O•}• W• h• • • ~ I• /~ ~~ 1 • A A A A A A ! Yi ~ ~ !~ p jZ~ •J•((YPY•• WC Y PY SY h N RRM n ••• N.y• ~yn~•• /1••R Si1 •piN•NON~Ny any ryi ~MyV ryP ryryp OwN n1••N ihON•NNNIMi>Yp•YN w~l1•IINA NIIN111NI N•I NII•NN•1MV•RRMN•n1 Yn1N RRXXSSXXSXSSn NYN1 •V• •;: Y• Op •• pN 1•N pNN N N NNN NNN Np NN NNNpNNpNNppNpMNNNNNMpxMNpNpNNNMNppNNNNN MNpMNNNpNNNpNpNNNNpNNpxNNNpMpMxMNNNNpNM •}• • • W • V I 1 1 I 1 1 • a O O• O• •L •O• • • L OM Oip • .I x Y L J • V ~ ~ N i 3 YO • ia N • M • •1 •1 N p Yp n0 J • • • Nb ll • I 11 L •1 pW~ i i • N O Y N ~n > V • Y • ` Of V M / O • • N VL VO VVV V V V V VWV W; V Y ± V V Y M fZ O V V _ Vi~ ~ W M S N Si i i 9f 2 Y V V J e> i f W : J V hJ VaN • „ M N +V Y Y` N O i< W! OW _Of0 Z • • W Z V i O n J 1 > N OV W Z Y O: N•Y <MxM O VLNZi ~ ~ > h WNVW S L ~ f 7 ~ ~ W \ S ~ SW i3L N 2 Y N Jf 7N V fl [ • W OWr 1 •W YJJ O ~OY ~• • Y Y L Y • i M •M OY W 1 h W Y LWi Nr VVN J W VSLL YN W< VYO YY Jw\rY lWJL • • •n• O yF M fxONiJi hZO M h ViM YLOO>9 Oir01 MVZN hY YNW • • • w i F P f _ W _ _ Y WLO yew ja1 t0 W L¢ V [LSM p YY~iW2r •1SWY p> hN tViW prL i Z F WZ ML NfxWZ „ihYYYMVV VNO xY OZW W¢ 2 i IV N• W O • Y O ~ `Y n „ OLN >WZN iNhNf Z Y1iYY NY• O xYy jW JMNZW VVY hJL O<' LYnr MO { Il i0• M Y ~ V J F Ja Lr N L N YNFy „ IZWW iOhYfia WWi ^ Nf•YW\ Yar N ~YNJ26NLS1r3WntfVYYJO'rJi V : > Z Wa J pYWY»VFNY9 JVUf> YYYLPWYLieOWZNV Z ~Hi V_ i O • O O W V YW Oi Y>YVNNhi OWOJWNONiJ2>rhY iWOYWfLMOZN ?NFOYpJZiNhL¢ JVWMZWYYiYZPJYYZWJiN¢VrY ' r~ Y V N ' = hW OfrJ>30 J\f W0< J •WaiNWLO•NYON>N WWfV ZWUatYLVL•p0>YLNCY}rpJYJYZOLLiOjwS•YYN • ' y i O O i f r _ Y O i N Z r x 2 NJN ~ > NIN WN h i u tW jSW~i f •W/1W O W• HO 3 O Y p p C t r SN NV i a yJ 6R LSS •W S • Z u L VL 3 O FVf 0>i W Y „ UL Z NFN¢J V N i> V¢JO • O y 3•WO ~ •f eN•MZ NNZNLO e 2 rNU:V ZtL> VJ Y O Of0>LpVY O • • : Z ¢O•j ZONO• ~J Vi'J NjZ • • ~~ y j : M IW[ W V i f i MM W VYNNNJOW •JNYWYfN >Y _N xYNN e P iy~•NWYnPLY3iW[f Yx LY W i u =iWr Jf t M HJ O r S ~ ~ • W •_ S NOJO OfV• i LrWx2iZOMh t i Y >•JY i NMYi N 3 L Z • •D O O N 'JLNi • YW> J•V W301'6WY Z<3WYYfl • : O O S Y fJ W WOYY><SOn h[i0 ZWpSJYO{•<jWW WY iiVLfSi 3YJNi Z OWFi ZjiM N•[ZLN • • w > N N i Z• • •YSUVMSrLN •YLO•WONY VhYON NNWZ WNfV • • Y W O J Y V J Y J WLO•N V JY 1~YrY3 [>I3Z j• » >YOONSZN~• • Y~ OOWWJYOnh>YI>NiLri> >YI I •[• •[ S • 3 S 'J NI ONVYL VVWPOLWtMYN>J OfZYWPh OfYt)YNY » JZ>Vf NWr :Z: O V i ! Y Ln tf~~•f ff~;••~0•YYYVUVUYVUVV000OOOOOYVY i io• a °n w e ow nenne•h•nNnnNa>an••anNnnN•innNn•wnf• '" n>nMNnwnr•^ •n•nnr••w•• aw•wienen•N 01 O O Op ~ P ryN~PMO•f • p• PNnry N VO±MryN O n •I N N • • •N • Ay nNN n NN POAONAONIAMPONO\•POAnPP~AONOONnOPO\~NPhN00•Nr0\~OrO N^N\MONYrpNNhOON•1NNNNON00\ONNN•OOONNONONIOFOOA•000 rr NNYMA101N rh NNAr~•1ANn^O:NOYr•MhNIbA1AANNEM\AEN.•N4 !•r • M n • r NMr • NN • N V_ `NN M uiM OHO 00 MO OJ• F U i• Z~ ~: . i Z. F+ Z• . iW •Z :i +Y •O YNNNYhONOM MII'b NOhOIOrMN•NOPONOyNN•MOI+ONOMNNIN\h\NO••NN ««««AxiJtRRRiRRG«A«SIRC9C:RRiFRRRi7ti««A««S,««««iiii >NNwMNNNNNNMNNNNNMMNNNNMNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNONNNNNNNNNNN 00 00 00 • x •00 • j0 YOM O M OEM WY LL• Y Y Y< f!> ~ ! • pNN+1 !YY W i Vh > •JNi \« Y O• O N O :~ : r i i s J~•.1 •aF• u r eNh W s i 00 wNl OVS V O , «~ O NyM O 9 E YY> N ONR Jb Nir > LL O i YYN O U NNW 9 O Y• YY N _ „ N M ~1 • YY > Ny VY J F•A•W u~ ~ f O •1 T JN300 10 i y Y 1 11 M N Y ZO =N1<W ONZYJ i O O NY9 OON N wW •WI jWyrN s N xVhe<x<NNw •YeuN Y<a J Y Ms OON U Z W NNiYfYW Nr ZYWJOY JrMZOINj ~~ T yN0 OFNi IMNU MNNZZN~/E j•IN•tbLNY OOYN MIxW J UJ Oj< WOwi 3• J`1+0 :OjOVN WYOt• M N JOW •<J W)x 00 'J\O JO 1 •<M•N WMNVWOtN JOiYY ••N Oy• N•xNN VPjf•LO i•i ^>O YMj YO JNO \WO•YV WYNNO Y> i0 O NWW• jOW9WE <A\~yOyJ\MNY ~hN ~OZNlNJN WOY f JY\MZ'J OOiYNM• V V< M iZYyy • IL NN 1060bWZ OLW NNNW: `j•iZNYJ f jNWNINiO iONYO•V JM O N iN NN RM~VWNi•y<NWZWN•i y NZOyVNOjNY l0< Zl ~••p WOI ZiiNW NY»Z<> YtWNVMV• Y_O N _W JWIOMO •=„OI JJOI j iMyZ O+EE JOYE NZtlNiYZ .F N WYOxii• OM UV OMwrOZ Ni N O 1V)Z<NUINiW<~li ><1•Y OyWN~OO VZMIVMYYyY M•iWViN ~~IIi11 IIJN iJY pORM WO=nJN• 00~•Nr<NYJY<R<NTWJYO~YOJZip JfNMiVTYO\ NJb OfJy)O •WNY <VJVOiN MV.9 JOWZt•NjOM•YOWZY PNO 1 •ZMJV 77i ZI WWNONN<pOiNO>_Ni99Ny7Zx Jt~NM~AVZYO J ONOWYY WWYOYOpEWWEEli11V •EEYO OjW E •WVOOLOOYVrrNM<•Y« wWZxuY Y6•Y•wV•Y>JNNAO)t>Yr)OfEWiiYyYJWM•Y•OZ>ZVhJMiYZNZNi y_ _V J i VN y U i1 r O < Wi i > rY O Y NJ O V w W V O >U O JM O M f V,« i lJ pY M Ji N V tZ 7• , NN •Z MY• W _ y MO pN~ N ZpZ f ':SSW•1 ~ EJ V I' ZN YON EVW W NUOi00• N rJ i Y J ZV<J NJ • uYY N \ O i•N yi V it E Y t0 iNVU „~f O• N.O. WZ N•KVW Oy~<VZOY rY MN 1L N WF JW JIL MYW VJiVN NNrN V•YN •Z Z NJ rZ O M ON Y jZJO J FV • y~,1Ji <WN•.•yY <ZV y'J'J {~W~yO iMZNO Vi O<i0<• YWNJWZ i )NOON YOEW O~Y JrJW1 NVO<NZ Z>rYV•J'! Z<YiWVYfJ •W > MZ 1Y NiYOV< VW •pJrOriOZN~JJN >NFJFM•ZENi,iZJWN <eONM •NS=WOVJi<WOO,NONrFpWO,VVU •~iNN<rrN<Jloo ie R' uW w< NNWW en yre<s ooeN J>JZF1•iVNyJWri~\ NZYYN03WYfNJJOYNOViZiNYWf•,•OYrZ1VV' ii<yNWyVJNYOJJOiViY0i0•i90hVOiIMOW000Yr0•rii'JJINiiO yWSr« eaers:.e NNS•We<e <W•issys .••W:rNeoY, • « W IL ILLLOVVZiZZZZNNII.[ZZYJJJZiZZZ000000•Li6• ••LLLLIZ>ZOZ> N~OnnNrAn\wOrrO.OrNNwN•IrrhNA9r•nnNPwRhrMNR•Rm~In P• .•OnNN+ZNJVInO! O M NrNwNNZnENNNO nn ••N•N Nw N•N N • O•NNNN NN nN O N iNN 1 ~aM uNl =~0 iWe iOw FY OJO Y <: rl f 1 ti Y it Oi i• >; ':YyNDWDDY OONOM000 ~MNNNNNOV• Nw1NAlyiwM W /111Py NN y N N NNMOOyNONVON•OINNNVyyNO !. NNOOOMVONN•NOONN!>INiO. 111 S.{M~VSVVY 0r1•111w11^I!y/Ni 1Ni1~NYVO I NNMNNMM P./NV MN NOIY• N N V w { • A JINIM•>6wNNNOM OO ONNIIIMVNO>OiyNNINVhi Wssssasoaayoa7syyaa7yyaassoaa.os.aa NNNNNNNNNNMNNMNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ONNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNN V W O • 100 S • O N Y Z u1 ~ i yN r i N y O M yN~ Inl N V NO) 11 ~ yi V 1 W i NMO i W l N~ V W V •iN W 1hW ~ y ~pfi ~ i0Y M ZJ OYY \ N1Sw }N-MMVN MWf f Mi •iVWV O NN YYNWi O ~ YO! J i Yi~ YNOpw FN. 1 WWw iJ O NMWY N i V OOWi• y ;W•1L>O • Yy>NW Y 2 4MNY 'J _ > Y.tV 1 WZZMi P y (MO yiN NN >iMa NIiNNw+w O O NNINNVW N ~ •P {O T O/N Zf RJWi YWNiNV21JPY /AT WWZN 1 iWWf\VN PiY fW0 iM ZWy V~}iYN ONNM Y1N1 Y}Nifi)O{• Y• N D NWV N Y iw i• • OW OY NY 6NNW>VN h w YJiYJ~ YN JMWJYIVZw~VWYY N NWW WYZY ~VOMWOWI yN/VOfVO/1 ~Ni fYJiYhOMO IYIttOYNN iN ONJMW{ J fNJWYON • •MfMii N •~>y PhVO •N NwV'PjiJfNWN wOl~fOiiJylwNWiZ~Of iYOY)J ZNONfV >W IOOUINVYVfWN> • iFMN{ h)0;3W •+1W •NNW WNWYi; V 7J } Ny~y\WVVii T.Y1 I/•IY/h>ti i2tD23M y0 ijp10 NNWN~.t~\UO NOL\f~~~3~VJM1Y'1V t/1J3MV~NY O1lti y i >/N Ni• f WZ J iiN /VY W JiW L N O iY~ N y 4 j •ZM Y V >Z V NF> i p Z tY aW i NM_ _M)E Wji ~ Y N J /Nf •J ~ U O i Y • w~ i /> W V O• U i WN MwY 00 )1 NVN =NijWV „ Y VO ii YW~'JV f0 M w1Z.1M kN~i.1y0 MN6Hw VJjOOWW OV J i LL YWVyJYyO hWWYV Y3JiYOWNZOi N t ONY. WM 1 /YfNN~3 f N•i000W> O~MV O >'J/}iyyNNYD• 6 Y Y09f WYyYOw WOZW yQY WifVWMO•Z~Ni{N WWNOi YV• M• WW/ >OJyJJO NYiJ•Y YM wV V~tr wi MNWNVWN7 Zy6lY~ZNVVS03V VNNYOWWWWN JJJ/N WO f0>Z w\62j 4Wy YWYJ•tl00 tIWW~Y ti UO\WWWW WOMN ZZW •>~fY YVV V iiVifMMNwJJINanNJ~~iW OOOtyIWN 003fWOOiZ iYt{WW4p40WW3 fYWtlfNNNNN NNN/>//h>33>iZiiZ'J W/4NY N}Vwh•NNIN N~MNNOw1YNINNwMiiiON/Ir NNN NNNPON 00/NNOVN•>OMINNMN0111N0 N NN NN wNN Ne1NN N N MN N N • u e r LNw ui~l 7<N y!M Of0 ZZ V Y1L O <OO t `I K LNW eNs ~Je w ~ U i• O i• •. i• ui ci O < O e' ei :~ ii f~ Z Zi ~r •~ I C N~ ui N• W• O• M1 Y• Z• p O• O• Y~ W• >: 1 w O O• r O OONO I 1 w r r N owwc N P Yn N w n+P T a N N + NMMNOw0000hNOtO00000pONOOptO00N PO/NONtONNw•{ONNp/O•OOhO{/n000i + aNPPNpOtlIMNyrNOOPOOtNO+pO•ONONN N •NNPmJtNNhNM•tr+NwMP•=PONhNNN A ;Nt = OM N + O P • w n O F w ~ n n n n n n s n n ~ ii ii n ~wNY{Z•+rYrw/w~ewNYN.ehiweNNnaNOhN^prNn•Nfh/w"Mnh'wna W$'zsSSIRxS~::a.aaaaasaaa:~:~vss5.raaasa3aaaa++f++++SS ONNwNnNNwNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNwNNNNNNNNNNNNNnNNMMNNN U 1 1\ 1 1 I I I \ • • w \ 1 w W L I• N W r i h y O N rN n r N • < w iN i w n } •M•n• „Nrw N N M MN r L wNMMN NY9 Y M •NNwN wN N N V w• hWWWi {•p + ; n N 1 \ W\ \Z \} O NLL > > Z NI h LM NN /N O « NO Ow NPi •Nw \ L\ rl F L NPVV}Z LrN/M•[ WP \V•V V MV y Vwh V y WW Nf N iN • \ 9\y NN\ V •v v vl v \~ v PW o oo++»N •NiON w v VWV ViWV V VVV VN< 6f f V Of n L L <Nr V Z}rM rWr Wi JM„ rNLi i 1°si ~~ We io Yz.Wil~ ww}.• •wf•O u 1 1 N NZh W• YY}L N••\\Mw}iw•NNLf V • OL Z f iN L W• iMi wPw \iW\ }rW H e W W Z•wf Otf • h0>WNNO\rrr+{•}JrhJi f• O f~ L L O~JW„ f0 V } fWrN\\wrif rf\rfY WZLN Z y iV N WC /F •[ 2r_10_•N_\/•Nw\\WL\MN\Mf Uw W W W Z/NZ N WO O N N\ nNN NV NM iJ O WW i VViW R YM L NWW\ i/ O O}Wf f W 9 M Z VN OZNO zy \OW L•NW7WWLWWLZ W66N w Oi { 710 WUJUO O •}/•}6•~•pL6LV•L< JNW i i ^ J J iJ iWNt LONWWF•Z Liy•ON•O WOW} i W OW O iw0 NOO Z >N W{p\ M} > NiVVNi ~ L LL W { F•110•Rf O[f<•w N7•[• JJfWWtJW9J fJJJ6LNWN W W i h F VJOiWWOV WJOYLL Oi00pWOJJ1</iZ O O i Lf Y }1 • NWYi•O•WWNp O•NZef MVOON • • V Y Z p NWZO Mfy/W}u• ZWNpYwWWWLZLi/ /N NVI N O Y >O ~ V isOU Nw imw •U~ZWU NVVUOOU LY>}f0 N} W 6 M JO• WLr ie } N NW WIL'MNVi SY~V NWW Zi O L W •• } N f>MN MWM~Ji/<•UZ{J~JN<•100f•MJ<70<JN•~Y/{ 1 W f W ii 7 W<JW Wf OH••W JrJ<JWUVWJ'JOJOLJO•WWW n p Y L WW } L YY}G <Lf<ZOTN6iL/•JNNMLFO[L<V•YONpIi/O J O y N Z p f O } < N N W ~ O N N Y y V N Ot VY Y rr N N y W} U 0,[ ~( V h 'J 9 J ON J } N P yNi O Yi pO y ~J y N y 00 } i} ~ ~ C K Z Z J i Y 6~ e J Z O Y G O V N} • V • •G ~Z O • M V< M f : i .. W G W W Z O J } M y W i i NY > YW Ru Ji ry<r W us N h M _hf} }_ZO ZN LOW< L ~O } < N y f zs i }mil FV < J Y20<M•y~l Z U hfi}hNOOY~ Z } M iM w iM M ajVieyW WULfp( Li• WZ=}iiZ•iJ O M • 6 Ww Z y <i .y z• Fy VWW Il pLY O OOOwwY.y V ~ W f }W W yWfW /•NwV .LL a•YOON Lf>WMZWW fZfV•}LfW N i i NO 1 L~}WL ~Z}Ni•Ofwwh}}<01>fY•Z .} NN _OV f f 7N N WAiN WUY000<.~~ftlULL' Z.•Yi .O• LLW w M N} O WM i .Z6}Z••i+>N O. •W .i 6M»NNOiiO O N Z f < W i}/W <J6f •ONOU VO O• •W/>WW .' 1[O J9L L < • f Y V UNNV ZM2••y0 Oi•Y/1[WippiZNZyJVfYNOf • / V f ~y O Y Yff6 tl W7WU}fNN}fVZ/f ~JiYf OVOL6N1'}ZiV U i Z <r0• JZSaNN~9f<fff Wa•JJOif•Z••u•pe9 7 W N N yY } h 6LZF « « \ « • « <•OOOpOepO00LyVUyyUVy U n < •T OwNp ON }1N eOCN~O O••Orr+.pMPM~+•VrNN NO N •± ~ hnNw O••ONM.pN•Prnwr• NOpOw Nw O N r N nP/ t0•NNN» / ONONNw••eF} OrN N } w N rNN NM•• NryNNnrNNrNN NN 9 V_ ZNN VSN ~{N VVI =;0 ZLLo fOy V OYl MJO U l WE u• is ~ ~ e Y ~W~ •<~ •Z• 1 t/• :O: O •Z• /) OONOa00/OAOONaNVMN00000000NNONNOA00009NONNOOw000000 ONNOPNONwM11!!/>rM VOON00000llONNOONrya010pw ;10a :10N00 N/aNA/VIAAMOVhOAIi•ONOOVOONNPONOOANOOhNNMNMNIN/OOVVO a•PaNmVOw•I wM hVNANO •!hlNaµwlwAYaahwAhNMh/OlIVP/MN^ N•wNN•w NrN wN : • N aAN viii N t N n a r .. A Nra M JN A JN yVh O>OwNNaN V1•/NO{NA<pMp VM •V• NOwNNIN COIN ONONMN•N<PONOwNNIN W SaSSSSSV VSSSSSSSSMrMIw~SI•Slw•1~/AhN1~1•Iw•j•h1•hrM~hMhIN•IA•IN•APMr OMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN U O • O • Y O O V• / O 2 AJ JY J W { <t• N N UNON JL P J M Yf WVi M P <wS A •i • N MP FL// •1 MI /\ N VP •i{O iN / NiJ fw W N\ • O N Ow Y/ ' Z\V \ •<••M /• M YL< •• YM / \O YO/M• • \•1<Ow OOOw N V NN ON Y OWM N /• NJ w\ OYOOJ •• M~Z<• \ It\J O• NWl\ WN Z Z/L i f0 \N O • \ O)1 N NYNO N 9w \ O ZW W Z• Op M NfNMp NWLV• AL O /p MZV\ p! 14 OfiJNI NZ/ W S j y<WN W PVWL 1/ PWUN YJ h N y>Nl J•N NYLW6 YN/Zy / WfUN\ l w lyM• \UO \ {N \ V YM ll W WN V ll'O!• l plµ < µ••J7 LN JW ~yralhOY~Oh l S iY W IJVO <i U/ J V / /'J N/> OJ WWOJ•1<tWll / //{ y 1 N I lllf n pi aWWiJi\O<\//f/ \ JNl O{OOJN N l/OiW li JN/O / ul/NIWNMIN IVI ~N OIiiJ iNFL>µNWNi/S/VNJ .i VJI YV WaNN •lWNJW\<YWNOVaZW/WOUM WWWWWJ/JMV<~\<MMW//F<IW WIf WW ViiINNN/Wl<J••••Ol/WL V WWWWWINIJ J< LJU/OTUWU l /M WO J V LIJV ii/NOM Y //INILO I'Y iU4Y< N/LW{ N N/1 WZN VNNyI\ OOWWIL OOOOOJ40lW6 M lllil I1090/ JUO) OMhWy~IWNI W /OIYJ//Il JJJJJNJN9f< /JWM •W JOOZ < NW LOJf II FZIIOV/ZfwN/VMiJWO SiiW\WNWM)lJNONpiOilVN VZWN WfilWJZZWWW iLYNWtl WWWWWy/YiRL<Y/l• WI~~ 1Nl i// )71Y0/O=FUiWiNiWI/00/•//Y/Y~M<YON<VMn/NWi1hONl O{OfW<NVf000NW1[lV/w/Y~</OfT{<•lµ <W9W{O •i00V/WWV <i1/O 6W/OWJJ••N/YN SJ6lVpOi/~lJl/YY/hihiNl~iN<NJJ'OW/J/OWO Ji/>WlJ>M<`Y`i.H OJOMf WONT l9NiZZZiNNMVIW`1 yiJOOO W•J i9)O /OiUILW/Z>r SILO NIL YUI IC/ON/VWW{PVUVVVZMiMWiWJJN4l~<SUU« x r e u u o 1`u W iY hJ V N JJ V O N? 9 W O V p•j NaO N •Y •p V Y Z WY <NH MLL N ~ i< •ZFY WY N < N NM Z ~ / < WJN NY/ YVJ < WV YN W ) <r ~i J<rN i V • !• NVM WV Y< •JJ W•OW f/<j WV h YW M>Y OL OjjN <Wj ••t OO/W iNON <WW JIL O < i F1 0/iW // iZ NjNp/J OV\/ NWYF /ii OIL N `yWR < fFU SWWWjO l0 NVOV ijV </WU W<N/VW LW M W YtUN « V)M/lW ROJOOW •i<WINn JJY tlWi<l ~ 6i\J JYiNNj //pL JOfiM /WO>JWWY hWIW JIJOW• /lV O pW IV ~MW3 ••tiNly < <L>•N OIL> OON 1<P {i<OVOWN V•L WV Ih OO• M/M V WiIJ •h2i •iYJN<06Wf6VVl •__i •yjN O JN<~NyIVO/YlY<~hJ •<jYWWN<WJI •Mp0 •/WW<VMV OYOV• LNNJ W<fWMMW<YSVfWLZWLJ OZONZiJNVWiLL10W MVNOU VN</NOWWY/JSVJVJiN<W LiUViWNY/ •7t<WW• NUNO)O }WjV/<VWiNJPO000it JYJJZWWWNVOiJN9YOUVOJJZiWrL/JJ L WWWUNN><JNNNJJOO/« VNO/i/J<WW0000/ •2jiN0•« r~•J« OCOOOOOOOWW WILW LLY.l 1lYVVVVVVVVVLLZiFZS2MNMNrlliiii YJJ OryNNAhhNT/•hAa•O/O<a0•hVOnAONA•IaNJNAhaµ~FNP>µvP• NTaOONA~NNNA/ANNANAN•NPNVNNNNANNANµPON< N rN vwNw±O NNµO/PNNµM00•OPOnPMNN/yONP •wP µ•INNMr<•~. ry N NNNN ••r<Na N r MN N N NNN N /~ < V_ ~=w y~N €~° lea ONW Jp F 6 LL V E .. n: E ..: W: u ~i • • •h• r•i~ P • f ~• • Nt6• \:O: N f O:i~ ~~ • • t• O ~ • • i_•_ • 0[ ~O• ~:~ • f •i~ i • y • • • h• ~rY •Y• •V• •M• •W• •O• • •i/ •WI •~/ 1 • • ~ r I ~ • S • ~ • • • • • • ~W~ •i• •f• •Z• • O • •W• NnNO0100NOP000NINOMOhOnNNONONMnNOONnMwOnONOVnVONM00 wnOON~NI~•~NMY1pN/NbIMONphY1~NOM>10 VM10J10n000N/nrVOwnON n^rwbwMNhPllnhfn±wwlnnO~00Nf NwOwy10w1+•'I NnO100V00 NMM n:JN b n • rhn nh N KO wrV :w ::N N n N M n N nN M M iJ~bMONOwNNJMOMOPONHIIn•••I1IV1~~yN1Z•V P1POrNNVNOhONOJNN•NOhOPOwNn<Nb WhNAhrr~Mf MArIV•M1AI>hl•I•I•hMhMIN••brIV•w11••b•Arh~FFhMhMFF Flhrwl:w nl=1` >NNNNMMNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNMMNNNNN ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNMNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNMNMNMNNNNNN N h 1 ee ) e < 11 / o w i 111i ~ w N w ww ~ o, w inn • ^ \ w e< 1 P O ONr P • •\ OM M N Oh\ O P N ww N h hP• \ 4.O\ w\ N N NW i J JJ ZM N ••MI \• \ JNOJ hW i W i PO O W •1111 PI >N f•M< i0 LO i 1 ` \_O ieW _W _7L`` ILOwiM hL Vi h w O./ ~w ~W P/ V SiJ O >O L O < JV < J iMM M \ • 'f NONM OWN JJ OM O O „_N iV ws NNI O la •M PWWVM M fVW /N• V I IM~ ~\S N Wn OYNaiN//W N O i /I WJO P h i}J a\ WI „NiN O<N>Oh fN0 „> Wlt P NN WJJ O V NaMhi iiPM\n U i<JV L>OJ< INi i W< MVNpaW WW\ W YY\W WiN OS MO WiOi 09 W O « >Wp i SNW MWNii • JNIiy</ NVNZeWWNY OH Za WO JMN WiYZOO~Ji YW ~\J OiOZ pJ 9 SpWlh • 00 Y: J p JIW<yM01f aYW ~1 /N INO•Nif p ZO:Nh9/NO •N M W O fp hiii LLip! IL/aiiP hN J N OL N„O O 6Ni• 9 /OUWMa1F'J Op 70 ONW92 WON Iff0092 Nh\ p NOOMMM NWOOJ iLfO NV 00 iNiN Uh0 MOMVWOV 1 WViNiVLJJ ZNNah Z ii NIOi OfN PNiel MW f OWLO N~IOw fONNJi WF NZWihMONW N IIJJW MJ /2 h0 NJL6i•[n6 O<JLL eN J> W W O i N f Y •w 1 Y N W V V J / J J• W O i Y J O i O N NOW \ N V~ O a /IL O6 i/SWiiiOW /W/ WiOIif OW vMWWWW< VW < iJhN W O tiO W1'•NMNie f e0 i W><O 00> J CNh N hJa~ O:'W hWw iWiLVN O>/WieLLwWfhh<i2wW i<NW V}OVNiZNJ • hhVZPh_ WhV9t YhIWJW \:iNN>VYIJIN I••i Nf\</702Ni OOV NNfNP hONNWiNiLOVhhO pNMOhNwU iNWN`•Ni00NiLMW•i W J+\ SZ> hW<Ni MS JOW OIYYYONN>WwZf fNM ShV t Jfh10hW Y OJfO~W<}}W<ONJNOWLwfJOWYjT~Y1>11V)bO~JJJi W/O<W<OM1WOJ<> ~ypVyL/ioM>i lp Vie00iia<>NpiwNe<OJVOrhtl/f •[LOOi00VOi0 •Y >O u li+ o y V Y ip JZ M • MW Z OW_ h W O h 2 • < > W V W YV n Zf 4 Y 01 W Z J Z ~ / i • U Z y G~ N t JW 00 OJ f Z L 11Wi ~ WJ .O : 1a.1n yN f >y: M W h YJ • yJ f JO >J < 2O> J ~ J < V Zf >fu JJ Z• NWh O W W•i » Ni VWV pf ~ YMi O V yVZ h ZZN> N OiNJ V pW p>W V VV W hMZ•[ON l htiZ ~<W •i V MiwJ1J•1v wNV0•> ~ J1•Z•O p0 NZJ Wh O •«Me YZNONiMaYNi6 ~NFiWQYSOJNW{~h 060NW0 O WVJWyi ZNZZN=h O/V> • JOa<Wh•[O \ NOWZJWaJUN2 iw O <JNW <NhZ nZ0 ZWaOVVMWf •n•~JOM<iZON92W<2 aV0 •NW>OW<sW• Vp• V<ZiOM <i WOVNC[ZZNOa ONOOiZOfMNO W > VigWN2 Nt J • JNf J'JZ NJ nJOiOVOOJZ •ahSyV N O>W<•ZWVNOVWZN ••WN •O<V\<W• JiW OiNNJ Wi i •O •Nh> wFNW<N<f~ <OOWifM<ihMN OONf/ h ZWOWWtlZWWWWJ<NpSNiWY W'J •[VOOWWZ/yOZJ 060U OOZi•[•f 0_WWZhOhV01~J_pLLySWWWW fWNNOOi<ff <VWWWWN00009itWMOiNZff• >hh2NOYi'J> riWM00 JJJJJJiiiZZZLLiCZtiZLZZZZii000aapapppppaa>a06eW6fOW PNNn=NIPbPNnhONNInJrNON000NNbNbOwo~ahPwOrNNbONwrvbhrv ONNf hNONrOPNNh•bN_I•„MOOnNhP hhmN T•pO±:VhnPON M1N 0I.OON rNwfbrOn••Or N• ryNMNO/ONN~ Nn NNONNN NMN NN•• N •Nw NNNn NNNbNN N Nb NN < u e .• !N• uu<iN J<N Vi„ Zi0 i Y O O O LNW OMC J O Y LL E Z• <~ •• O• i i i r _O• \[ 1[ i• •tl• •e• 01 •i• •W• oe0a eewaee•e•> NOO! NOA00.OOON n~INiw AwNjN1•riwrlN ON N aV MIryMNN N a NNONONOO.00 NNONOwa000a O••rNr~M•hV ~.Aiw rrly^:.N N NNONONN O A•O.Oaa N •• api~aYO a :'=NNI= a M N N N a n n n n ~ Jh•N••~pNN ia,lN.a•~1•.~•iI~O NNNN•~NaNan•.•N1O1yyMNNaMar•!O W n~tl.l•AMM11. 1. ~. rslg=~~Z~~~~~11~~~~~yi~~~ oNNNNNNMNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNM NNNNM«MNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNN K _ _ ~ I<• •I\ • • \1\\• i w W ! N N J N N y ! i • ! • i ~ N W • N Y` \W Y N ~ V M N i J : N~a• W N ! J J O V M O N O V M L !< W V O O s ••v s s\h ~«v r •NWNW P i u .v P ua «WV ar ••s!r v ! u F N 1•Nli NM NMPi F 1• ~ M t h irN <J IN ISM h i <rN - M<Ni a OW •! J\7M! h0 < N ~i• N «JN< r- OMOO R 1fN i• J W Na00 i7 ON V FNO<N p• aJN iy y WIiJ N If00 !N<SW i~ aJ WY•1 N VYt J Ni O W< N ~ WJO WNJ O `~ r ai OWh fJWi« NrNNW00 NtiJ 9iii0 I- iYIYyY<N IfOJt 7 iO~N N -OpWN Nt OtIL l J aYOWOON JOO WdtliWfi arOM•LLOt t< a<WiJN Oai• VWNJaaWhOW N aNa•MW•iy ••JOOa00 iM •WWiI>ieN ni h<WPYw hiwN WW- !<pYWNON IOOYdWN NW O IrW WNt 2 60 ri Uf ri aiW ! h IL \•IJi rVih Jt\OYNiVOG T VYhVwYf O< ON<eV••N ifMi JJNr~ wl.Or lyaii< «OI O••O_i<a_•• 6 O< WF1. • 'JiM O••i NMf YY(Lf O Vi hlMW <iM020!!rW Il iilri6i0[aW NJLai•N <Vh0 nlpYY\iVfV NNVN<YYY<Wi aW6hVa! Y r) WN WO Vai r9L iNY N ONi F i Ni • O o ~N° ~3 P u` NrW N• 7 NV N r i i u«i \ N • V yi/ Ji N <Nil i160 Jn i <WOJO••OJJ NiWU i000~R~W<i •) <VVVYOaO• •rWN i YON OWNJ .6YYNWH .OJ J N W W W W i w 1L . »N MOOOIWlOrh OONN jiii22YW~f• K6NW <NNYWWWi NNN NNNNM NN a\NnaanpNn NahM nNw\Vi"~N NaNN NNTNNw ONN NNMN N•• NwryryNN J < JW NU WN Ls NW J xN i > CW ~~ B W 1<r <r V W iih yy W N M ri NWNVM riNZ y)JIhW )ON• iOYYh W<i•YN OFi h_O i'I WW. MrWnOJ WM• •<.)f NV <OJ .tV •aiJiai .S~~VV auRiuG JMW ONWOOii Pi .• W <M~aN<NyJ<O WOWNYi VWW~•~~NNOt NIOjRJiW PrrraiP•iuW N « <«WW NNNNNhrFJf) )iiiiNN NOOOP=aaNNN ONnwOOY arh•ahOOMNP OONNnNN n NNN NNNNM NN N ~~ w MAY 2 0 NECU a L a .~ .` CAPY YIYMOOM ~ 111[a0e11C ~Y~IM uewln I. T}}[(SI a 1KU13[I}I nu rq. }« Orrr N Mslylk O««T t«wd ,pf 6mduW $w[elae I cN SiN}'. 0Q+ 4 YILIi ~ ~ NO, n I • ~1 ~ ~ 1 ~ Seewrr, U1.9lIt ..ry...w.. ~.... FTTIIiG PVLL COO! 1 ~~h4.~~ N IrA }. N1WIA a ernlt~nrpl ~, u~,. GP a~«,tea Porv«r "r°'«d«~ }.o.. a MW+Dnw 1 1 `fl T.+ }«.e Ol.aew D+« Oe[41J Qnlalck - V.P., $ec. 6 L1F. }. TYIdf) d T9MIS~tTOMl9 I@ Vt. SYI! VILIJUtN, IffiTAI6lWf GPRIP, /NC, GP ;bw } 3ou.W 41 ievtd Villnltevl, P., LtC, SEC. S CiF. NIna11 ~~ >~ i CS[1 D. i Gim Lrd.PNre c 1J LuiGetl 4 INe~ N MYr !d SeW CTs K !. IweW~ dMMru-HUir W }wN 1G}09 ,w1 Orate[ Ot. , Ste. 11~ PAtAOWQ10MUr.J 917]0 91n Bw~cE}ro TdAI OrrMiw P«. 1}. ~y9lMre apre U) N,s1 w} wmyr ~.ployd M oTW Srertl paver; dN bra dl M 91ielA[MW+d a Stww, wd M Mr M wSl M uiuler sour r M u;alord w N M N M SkaMeSs tarrW M. '. IS. ST41E d C411(OYYA « Caunry N.... aivetelde ___.Mr....__5/1491 ur r+r • ti wlw+ Y r.,w.~ r/sn. M w r •rr~i. ~ W .. r n •• .•. ;. w., r ~...r ~. i.,, .rte ~/Y,r ~ ti a.w1 rI ~i I w y,.ea~w ~~~ rr u.r ~ v .ww~. ~ ~..+, u.. : ,..,r. µ. ~~ .. ~ 'r r~ .r ... r r w .w.u, +....~ w /~ .w. w ~ ~~+~ • u.1 .s r «w,w ~ a w- ~....~rM.+,. w ye4Lw,yJ ~..n.. ~ ~ ~~ w • u r ui r..w.... b .MF.. ~. ~4~ w L. Rr +w w - Il 1w11C~M ' ____ ________ __.___~___/__ _~__ ____ _ ' S1'.i.~".~~r ~-- SIGN H9! - }t;- _~~_'~__„ ` ,~.i IS ST41} p C4G}ObN4 Cowry d__________________ ...____.____.....M _______ ___...___....______ u.e. rte, w u.-. aM~ r ,~ ..r.. .Ir • ,..mow, ~w. w rr.w n~.:r~.. u: r..r _ .~rw r,.+. ~~n wu~: a ~....w ~.. w w.,41 ryY V.- r w rwr .+ ~ ~.rw .~..~~ H,r ~i1 M~y:.r+ 1w ~`~ wwav ~, +nti M w 6.w.nr~ ~~ wI« y`N+. ww„1 ~~, . r J y ,nN ^r++ I. r .. u M . ~^~ rd r ~. 1.n ~Y n eve ~ .u w w~,l~ .~r~ ~ xr i wAww r ~ ti wr ..er ~ L,.w ~ ..w I ...Mw, iu u ~...w.. W. w w .+ti-. ti .r. r wdwwwY V.w .r~~.w~~++n ,.r fir, wn ', Oa Nr lFdr lNer lAYGr; Fw WFwI«m Vr Oe1F Mad~y ^ }anrdl/naYe. ^ IlMiae} A«e. .__._._.__...-___ .................._..__, CO91}4 ,WNW _._______S/S4/W_-__..________ .,w.. ~i ^Mwwdr lw N....___...JNIr______..._.._-..____._...._dlw a________.-___.Anp N~..________.___ !3 'I i i i - ~ ~-- .._ 1 ~ f~~;~_-_ ~ m~ ~ , - _,, ,.: i ~1__..____fl p, i D°R- n I17 D..~~......il ,I ,~~ D ... n~~__p._-II 9-`~Tl O.._~~~ 1 ~ ..~~_a ~ h -1I n •~ 1 ~ -_:__~~ O y"~h---0 . II ~ I I ~_'~.a'"_D ~ _ .. ~~~ ~ T I ~ ~-----~°---0 ~ ~ a ~ s 3~ ~F LL~~ ___, ~I ~Il ~. u ~~~ 9--- II ~ R _ _OD ~, ~~ ~ ~'~s, ~___cpz'~ ~ ° , / /~ / ~ D °=, ,._..~9 , ~~ r ~~_a~ ~ ~--.-0 d ---~ j rr ~ 0-9 t ~~_~ ~ 1 _ _ I 1~ ~ --~ _ Yp3LAY[L~L _ _ _ 1 (~ e : ~„ N '~ A S /, ~r/: ./'~'•. ' ' ~~w jg/ { ~ C,S r~~ ,,,"y - ', ". •' s~',~ ~, ~, f' muc °p ~ doa ~ ~ rtn~• v n'ofn n tfS~~ N ~tpb ~ r~r ~ -1 uri ^ ~ O ~C t70 A ono -q n n~ ~~~-nn c d c n c n ~ i o m ~ m J m d ry J J ,+vc'vm J ar`to ~w~c dJ ~ nxn~'.-`• `~ na m rt m .i o ' yJ b IY fJ (D y~y~G JO O. 3 F C Z G d ~' r J ~ p .-' L tY V J n m ~'t7~C~ nlD a o . o . d -i y ~ a ~ ~ x h C C O v v J ~ w ~ N n n ~G ~ ~ U j V ~ V Y y 1 lD '~ y ^' a ~ w ~ a N N N ti_`1 ,~~ ,,~ \~ '1 tJ ~~~ c7~~'~ ~ I nxmv n~ n ~>,rn vn nx.n ~ vi.vn ~ DATE: T0: FROM: SUBJECT: June 5, 1991 STAFF gtEPdR~ Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Tarry L. Smith, 6uperintendent of Park Plenning and Development THE NAMING OF TWO INTERIOR STREETS IN TNfi PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIO~i The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending to the City Council that the two interior streets of the Sports Complex be named "victory Drive" and "Stadium Parkway." BACRGROOND Paul Rougeau of Traffic has stated to staff that the two interior streets marked pink and yellow on Exhibit "A" enclosed are considered interior streets and not public streets. In conferring with Brad Buller, City Planner, it was stated that if a street is not a public street it does riot need to go through the City's formalized street naming process. Therefore, the Parke and Recreation Commission has proposed two names for the designated Sports Complex interior streets for Council's consideration. The Commission recommends that the pink street on Exhibit "A" be called "Victory Drive" and that the yellow street be named "Stadium Parkway." Stadium Parkway was chosen because it is the street closest to the stadium and the majority of stadium parking. Victory Drive was chosen because it was felt that the name put participants in a positive frame oP mind if not consciously, at least sub-consciously. The green street is not included at this time, because it is considered a public street. This street will cross Rochester and connect to Day Creek Boulevard. It therefore needs to go through the formalized process of naming streets. TLS/dak is - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: City Council FROM: Debra Adams. city (`l ark~ACr•.,rAa M~.,~~e,-M __ ~~ BY: Tony Russell, Records Clark SUBJECT: D88TRUCTI011 Op CITY DOCONBNTB It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached form(s). Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destruction is first approved by the city attorney and city council. Also under the same Government Code Section, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA/tr attachment L~ l -~ RFSO1DFiON rb. 91-.+.c ~ ! ~ A RESOIIJFION OF 7th CITY COCNCII. OF '1}~ CiT1C OF RASiCND COCANCN(.A, CALZFORNSA, AU15Y1RIZING 'kII^, DE5i737C1'IQi OF CC1Y REOOH7DS AND DO1214FIi15 WfQCH ARE NO Ilp]G62 RE„7i1SRFD AS P%TJIDID UNDER OWERt8g77P CDDE SFICPIQ~I 34090 WE~.S, it has been det8xmined that certain City records ruder the ~'9e of the followirq City Departments are m longer required for public ar private praE»ses: PL*S~MING DIVISION WEQ~FFFAS, it has been deter'mi7red that destruction of the above- mentioned materials is rreoeseary to oo»serve storage space, std xeduoe staff time. expense, aid mnfi>,Sion in haidliicl, aid informiiq the public; aid VffII~RE9.9, Sectim 34090 of the Gover7mPht Code of the Ste*x a~f California atrtlarizes the head of a City departortrt to destiny arty City reoords std doarments which are over two years old carder his ar her ctrarge, without making a Dopy thereof, after the sane are m longer *~r,i+pa, upon the approval of the City Cormcil by resolution aid the written consent of the City Attorney; and Wf~IiFAS, it is therefore desirable to destroy said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto std made a part hereof, in storage, without making a apy ther~nf, which are over two years old; and WHI~RFIVS, lair: reoot,YLs have been approved for destruction bl' the City Attorney. NOW, 'IfII~REEURE, this City Coumil of the City of Fandro Cucamorzp u,ea hereYy resolve as toilcn~: SEIC'fION 1: That approval std authorization is hereby given to destroy those records des¢ibed as Exhibit npu attaciv.~l hereto and made a part hereof. SECFION 2: prat the City Clerk is authorized to allow examuwtion by and donation to the Depaxtmeirt of Special Collections of the University '--` 7.; t,.ary, University of Californtia, ar other historical society desigiated bl' the City Caurcil, any of the rewrds describai in F~ibit "A" attached hereto aid made a part hereof, excrpt these deaned to be confidential. SfX.TION 3: 'ih3t the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, std thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. \- ~{__ Resolution No. 91-+++ Page 3 pgpARy~Ny PLANN?NG RETENTION 5 years eREPARED Bx/DATE TONY RUSSELL/3-2-90 SNET.t N0. RECORDS CENTER xxxLE of DESCRIPTION Ot CONTENTSt COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT flLOCK GRANTS H2-H3dB3-84 CORRESPONDENCE BARMAKIAN, WOLF, LANG & CHRISTOPHER CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BIGEST COTTON, DONALD A. & ASSOCIATES DAILY REPORT INLAND MEDIATION BOARD SAN BERN, CO. OP OCD STATIONERS CORPORATION SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO T_~A VOZ PUBLICATIONS ' DONALD A. COTTON ASSOCIATES EL CHICANO NEWSPAPER C.D. PUBLICATIONS JOHN R. HYERLY, INC. BUILDING INDllSTRY ASSOC. BLACX VOICE HEWS ASSOCIATED MGMT. INSTITUTE INC. AMERICAN APPROVID POR DESTRtlCTION B2: RESOLDTION ND. 7 p `Ap DATE DESTROYED x ARezmsxx, sst. City ACtorney (D Resolution No. 91-+'** Page a POGGI, JEFPREY PRECZENT REPORTER P.I.P. PRINTERS NORRIS-REPKE, INC. METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT LANCE, BOLL @ LUNGHARD INLAND MEDIATION BOARD HIGHLANDER PUBLICATIONS WEST SND MEDIATION EOARD CITY 08 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MISCELLANEOUS CDEG BUDOBT 32-83 BANK RECONCILIATIONS B OP A CDBG PLANNING APA AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION BANK OP AMERICAN DAVE BLEVZNB CG ENGINEERYNG CUCAMONGA PRINTING CO. INC. COALITION ON BLOCK GRANTS AND ROMAN NEEDS EASTON, PERLA EDWARD G. HILL, JR SNLAND MEAZATYON BOARD RICK MARKS PIONEER CONSULTANTS PRIDE COLOR PRESS RITZ CAMERA SCAG COUNTY OF SAN~BERNARDINO DAILY REPORT STATIONERS CORPORATION /9 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: lone 5, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBIE('P. PROPOSED GRAFFITI SIGN YKl)GKAM The City has been contacted by the We Tip organization to see if we would like to participate in a graffiti sign program. This program and the signs have been reviewed by [he Public Safety Commission. These graffiti signs are similar to neighborhood watch signs except that [hey advertise a reward and atoll-free number in which to turn in those people who deface our City with graffiti. As you may be aware, the City kicked off a campaign with We Tip ro publicize and utilize this anti-graffiti hotline and reward system. The signs are being purchased in bulk by We Tip and would cost $15 each. We estimate that we would need approximately 75 signs; however, the minimum order is 100, so the cost to the City would be $1,500. If approved by the City Council, these signs would be purchased from the asset seizure account. Respectfully submitted, i Duane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager DAB/pr 91-89 - C[TY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 5, 1991 TQ Mayor and Members of the C1ty Councll FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ANNUAL LOAN TRANSACTION BETWEEN ..~.... .um a.:. i v: iviiv~.riv ~. iiiifiviVlYVff If1VL lHG 1(ANI:HU CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: Approve the repayment and re-borrowing of the annual loan between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, BACHGROUND: In order to receive tax Increment revenue, the principal source of redevelopment funding, a Redevelopment Agency must demonstrate existing debt which will be repaid by the tax Increment received. For this purpose, when the Protect Area was established in Fiscal Yeaz 1982/83, the CIty leaned money to the Redevelopment Agency !n order to establish initial debt, as well as to provide monies for operations. For debt purposes, the CIty and Agency have continued to maintain this loan from the City, thus ensuring the Agency's receipt of its full tax increment revenue, ANALYSIS: Each Fiscal Yeaz, the Redevelopment Agency repays the loan to the Ctty, including interest, with tax increment revenues, after paying all debt on outstanding bonds and agreements. During Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91, the Redevelopment Agency is able to pay to the Clty a total of $4,078,547.56 towazds the principal and Lnterest on the City/Agency loan. $2,000,000 1 s from bond proceeds to reimburse the City's Pazk Development Fund money loaned to the Agency for land acquisition for Sports Pazk. At the present time, it is necessary for the Agency to continue a portion of the loan with the City, in order to show sufficient debt to receive the full amount of tax increment revenue. Therefore, tt is necessary for the City to authorize the Agency to re- borrow the amount of $2,078,547.56. This wlll leave a loan balance of $7,965,450.45 R~eDspectfully(s~ubm~it~ted, ~ Q J~7~ /~/ /~u~rvx Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager ~~ ~•• i+vnanva~vn G STAFF REPORT ~~~- j ~,. <I DATE: June 5, 1991 i~~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~~ City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO FIND THE BARMAKIAN COHPANY, DEVELOPER FOR TRACT 13886 AND PARCEL MAP 11394 TN DFFanir nc rucTo IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 8, 1990, AND EXTENDED TO M4Y 8, 1991, ANO AUTHORIZE LEGAL STAFF TO CAUSE THE DEVELOPER'S SURETY, DEVELOPER'S INSURANCE COMPANY, PERFORMANCE BONG NOS. 983230-5 AND 983116-5, TO CORRECT ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENT DEFICIENCIES AND COMPLETE ALL REMAINING IMPROVEMENTS PURS'IANT TO THE AGREEMENT, APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council find The Barmakian Company, developer for Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 11394, in default of their Improvement Agreement dated February 8, 1990, and extended to May 9, 1991, and authorize legal staff to cause developer's surety, Developer's Insurance Company, Performance Bond Nos. 483230-5 and 983116-5, to correct all existing improvement deficiencies, and complete all remaining improvements pursuant to the Improvement Agreement and approved plans and specifi tali ors. BACK9IOUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 11394 are located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road, and is being developed by The Barmakian Company. The Improvement Agreement and bonds were approved and accepted by City Council on February 8, 1990. On January 2, 1991, City Council approved the Developer's request to extend the Improvement Agreement 90 days, which would make the Agreement expire on May 8, 1991. At this time, the street improvements have not been started, with the exception of the ;tarm drain on Base Line Road. The construction of the storm drain does not conform to City Standards or the Standard SDecifications for PublTC Works Inspection and the Developer has failed to make the necessary repairs. aa~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT . BARMAKIAN IMPROYEiENT AGMY. DEFAULT June 5, I991 Page 2 The completion of the storm drain and the structures is a prerequisite and essentiai to the completion of the north road bed of Base Line Road between Victoria Park lane and ELlwanda Avenue, in addition to the traffic signal installation at the intersections of Base Line Road at Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road at Etiwanda Avenue. The Developer and his contractor are in violation of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 12.03 with an expired construction penlt to addition to being in violation of Chanter 16.36.43 with an expired improvement Agreement. At the regularly scheduled C14y Council meeting of Apr11 17, 1991, per staff's request, City Council approved Resoiution 91-095 authorizing the City Engineer to cause the stone drain work to be completed. Prior to exercising City Council's authorization, the Developer and his contractor were given an opportunity to submit a proposal for correcting all the deficiencies. The solutions submitted were reviewed by staff, a consuittng engineering firm and the pipe manufacturer and found to be inadequate. The Developer and his contractor were directed to remove and reinstall the storm drain. During the above period of time, the subject agreement has expired, the State of California Contractors Board bas verified that the contractors bond, and therefore his license, is in suspension and the Developer and his contractor have failed to proceed with the corrective work. At this time, it is appropriate to find the Developer in default of the Agreement before proceeding with any work by the City to allow Lhe Developer's surety to cause the work to be completed. If the surety fails to respond, staff will return to City Council at the regular City Council meeting of June 19 with a recomaendation to find the surety in default. At that time, the City can proceed with the work and take appropriate iegat action against the surety company as well as the Developer. Respectfully suM WO:MP:sd / ~~~/(/" " ` Attachment as ~- RESOLUTION N0. `1 ~ -/ `j (p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE BARMAKIAN COMPANY IN DEFAULT OF THEIR IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 13886 AND PARCEL MAP 11394, AND AUTHORIZING LEGAL STAFF TO CAUSE THE DEVELOPER'S SURETY COMPANY TO CORRECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND COMPLETE REMAINING IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO THE AGREEMENT NITNESSETH THAT, WHEREAS, The Barmakian Company> hereinafter referred to as the Developer, desired to develop certain real property 1n said City as shown on Lhe conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 11394; and WHEREAS, the Developer has entered into an Improvement Agreement with the City to construct certain required improvements as a condition of said development; and WHEREAS, the Developer has been permitted to construct certain public improvements including but not limited to storm drain and sewer pipelines and structures in Base Line Road between Vittoria Park Lane and Etiwarda Avenue, an existing street; and WHEREAS, the Developer has failed to complete said storm drain and sewer pipelines and other Improvements Vursuant to the Improvement Agreement and is in violation of Section 4 of said Improvement Agreement; and WHEREAS, the completion of the stone drain and sewer pipelines and structures are a prerequisite and essential to the completion of the earth read bed of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etlwanda Avenue and hence the completion of the traffic signal installations at the intersections of Base Line Road at Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road at Etlwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City Council, prior to the approval of said Tract and Parcel Maps, has detennineA that the widening and improvement of Base Line Road from Victoria Park Lane to I-15 Including the traffic signal installations at Vfctoria Park Lanz and Etlwanda Avenue is necessary for the protection and promotion of the public health, safety, morale, comfort, convenience and welfare pursuant to said Code and entered into a contractual agreement with Gentry Brothers, Inc., a general engineering contractor, to cause said widening and Improvement of Base Line Road. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: as ~ CtTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0, BARMAKIAN IMPROVEMENT AGMI. DEFAULT JUUE 5, 19g1 PAGE 2 1. The Developer 1s hereby found in defauit of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Improvement Agreement for Tract 13886 and Parcel Map 13394, City Council Resolution 90-055, dated February 2, 1990, and Extension, City Council Resolution 91-004, dated January 2, 1991, Section 4, which states, °If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shad have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and/or his surety the full cost and expense incurred." 2. It is hereby detenalned that the completion of the widening and Improvement of Base Line Road, an existing street, frdo Victoria Park Lane to I-15 including traffic signal installations at Victoria Park lane and Etiwanda Avenue is essential to the safety and welfare of the public and that the completion and acceptance of the storm drain and sewer pipelines and structures not completed by the Developer is a prerequisite to the completion of the widening and improvement of Base Line Road. 3. It is hereby determined that the storm drain and sewer pipelines and structures not completed by the Developer are within the limits and scope of work defined by the contractual agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Gentry Brothers, Inc., a general engineering contractor. 4. The City shalt by any lawful means, pursuant to said Improvement Agreement and said Municipal Code, recover from the Developer and/or hfs contras±or and/or his surety ali coat and expense including but not iimited to delay cost incurred by and claims received from Gentry Drothers, Inc., resulting from the Developer's failure to complete the storm drain and sewer pipelines and structure work in a timely manner. a~ ~- - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~TA~`~ REYt3RT DATE; June 5, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Coundl Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager (~G FROM: Jerry B. FLlwood, Deputy City Manager Y1- SUBJECT: COUNTY BOOBIIVG FEES /, It !s recommended that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt a resolutlon otticially protesting San Bernardino County's illegal offset of County booking fee charges against Clty property tax and other revenues. As of January 1991, San Bernazdino County adopted a booking fee over the protest of all the cities and enforcement agencies of the County. The County started chazging cltles for the booking fee retroactive from July 1, 199. and in April of 1991, the County started ot7settlng booking fee charges against property tax. Rancho Cucamonga has had $171,814.20 withheld from property tax owed to the City. Therefore, Rancho Cucamonga may want to Join some of the other cities in adopting a resolutlon in protest of the County's action tnvolvtng booking tees. Respectfully sQubmitte~d~o~ Jerry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBF/pr 91-110 Attachment a3 RFSOIUFIfN NO. 91 3 A RE9DL[RRON OF THE CP1Y CS7[IICII, OF Tf~ CTIY OF BANCAJ CUCAMIi(A, CALiFY1ANIA, OFFICIALLY Fi27i'ffiTiNG SAN BF7diATAII70 OOfNl"[~3 na.Mrar OFFSII' OF f>x37FY BOOI@JC FFl: CHAPI;ES N.,AINSP CITY PIEDPEIQ'Y TAX AND O1HFg REVIIJUFS WECESiFAS, the State legislature in the late hofus of the 1990 legisla- tive session approved Senate Bill 2557 allavi.rg counties to dlaxge cities booking fees putting cities against mfarties; and WF~715, San Berrfardifn trxmty adopted booking fees in Jaruazy, 1991, lua,imia vi tii u~ l:i~ldtl afu 16W GILOIL~l3R SJB[C].e8 Or L'le mfufby, irfcluding the SI>Exiff; aryl 4A~S, all 22 cities in the county filed suite agairfst San Bernardiro Caufty in Superi~ CUUx't, Casa /262309; and WHIRFA.S, the Nfafty began billing cities fare booking fee charges retroactive to July 1, 1990; ofd ]~RFAS, the cities dutifully protests] suc3f dfazges piusuant to Government CUde Sectim 907; and WHFRIIvS, in April, 1991, the County began offsetting sudr booking fee dfarges against property tax and other revenues legally obligated to the cities in omtravention to State law, NCN1, TNYREFTx2E, the City Ozmcil of the City of Imrfctfo Cucamcuga does hereby resolve to officially protest San Bernardim CUmty~s illegal offset of Canty bmkirg fee dfar~ges against the City property tax and other revernres. 'fie City Clerk is henvlry directly to have a certified Npy of this Resolution sent to 2fd District Canty Supervisor Jon Mikels, the Clerk of the Board of Sc~ervisors, Carnty Auditor/Cartroller - Reofttder, the Cannty Chief Ar3uinistrative Officer, the news media and all cities in the Cannty. ,_.~- ~/ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~1~~~~` ~~~~~~ GATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF CITY LOAN (CO 88-D45) IN FULL The City Council accept E8000,00 paid on City loan (CO d8-645j as payment in full. BAacsNOUxo The City entered into City loan (CO 88-645) in April 1988. The City has received the total payments of EB000.00 as oayment in full of the loan. Re spe fully s i ted, im Hart Administrative Services Director JH/rs a~ ------ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .'fix:. STAFF REPURT ~.~: DATE: June 5, 1991 `?" T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: FEDERAL GtlYERNMENT REQUIRMENT TNAT EMPLOYEES NOT GOVERED BY A RETIREMENT SYSTEM BE COVERED BY SOCIAL SECURITY EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1991 The City Council authorize participation in the PARS program with the vesting, distribution and contribution rate as discussed in Lhis report. BACKGROUND the Federal Government has required Lhat State, County and City employees who are not covered by a retirement system De covered Dy Social Security, effet Live July 1, 1991. For the City Lhis means that all part-time, seasonal and temporary employees in the City must be covered. The legislation also allows for alternative retirement programs, other than Social Security, if the plan meets certain guidelines. Currently, Social Security coverage requires a contribution by the employee of 7,65% and by the employer of 7.65%. Staff has been in contact with a group Da sed in Costa Mesa called Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority. This group has Deen organized for many years, specifically, to provide employee he.^.='i is for the gr•o~p of ciiies that began the pool. Because of the new legislation and their experience with benefit programs, they have Aeveloped a sub-program (PARS) to provide only Lhe retirement benefit required Dy the new legislation. This sub-program has been developed under Internal Revenue Service Code 401 (A) (a section that meets the requirements), and has been patterned after the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). Under the PARS program the City would designate the benefit level at retirement and the contribution rates necessary by the employee and employer (the legislation requires that a total contribution of at least 7.5% be made into Lhe retirement program). Since the age nu ies Lhat join PARS have the flexibility to designate benefit levels and contribution rates, in a conservative effort, the PARS program is requesting that the Internal Revenue Service review and make sepe ra to rulings on the acceptance of each of the agencies plan that is submitted far membership. This allows for protection of the agency in the future if rules, etc., change. Staff is recommending that the City join the PARS program and that the following structure De set. for the program: a~ STAFF REPORT PARS June 5, 1991 Page 2 1. Vesting would occur upon completion of 5 years total service. Employees terminating with less than 5 years could leave theirs and the employers contribution in the retirement system and strive to accumulate the needed 5 years over a long period of time, or could withdraw only their contribution upon termination. In this instance, the City's contribution would remain in the retirement program and become a credit toward the future actuarial value of the City's share of future retirement liabilities. ~. "ti~cn~cn i. Jim's, i;.u Liun iunnu is ue e>ieui i>iieu ai, i.5;e a~ age oo wicb a distribution based on the average of the 3 highest years salary. Essentially, at age 65 the eligible employee would receive 1.5 times the number of years of service and the retirement monetary amount xou ld be developed at the average of the employees 3 highest years salary (i.e. 5 years times 1.5 = 7.5% of the average of the 3 highest years salary, as the retirement pay). Obviously, with more years servica, the distribution percentage increases. 3. Contribution Rate: Although the legislation requires that at least a total of 7.5% be contributed, there is no indication of how that contribution has to be made. In discussion with Mr. Bill Todd, Executive Di rec tar of the Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority, he indicated that agencies were submitting differing levels of cen tribu tion by *.he employee and employer which total the 7.5%. He indicated that in private industry there are Internal Revenue approved retirement plans Lhat have a 2/3-1/3 split. The employee pays 2/3 and the employer pays 1/3. Keeping this in mind, the 7.5% would be 5% paid by the employee and 2.5% by the emPleye r. Staff is recommending that the City submit its plan with employees paying 5% and the City paying 2.5%. Mr. Todd went on to indicate if the Internal Revenue Service did not approve the recommended split, ne felt the worst situation that would occur is a 50/50 split; making the contribution an equal 3.15% by the employee and employer. Additionally, he indicated there would not 6e penalties against the City if the plan is not approved, but that the City would have to make up the difference in con tributfon to what ever level was approved by the Internal Revenue Service. The trust administrator for the PARS program is the Phase II Systems Company, the depository is Imperial Trust Company, a subsidiary of Imperial Bank, and the investment pension contract is handled by the Hartford Asset Management Division. ~/ STAfF REPORT PARS June 5, 1991 Page 3 The initial cost to join the PARS program is approximately E1 ,500. This includes start and processing fees, as well as, the fee for the Internal Revenue Service to render an opinion on the plan. Resy s i ed, Administrative Services Director JH/rs ag t,xx x yr xsniv~nv ~~i:eun~iv uN ~TAF~ REpdT:,~ DATE: June 5, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jerry B, Fulwood, Deputy City Manager BY: Ingrid Y. Blair, GIS Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AMEND CONTRACT NO. 90-149 WITH FRA 3ERVICE3, INC., ASSESSMENT DISTRICT MANAGEMENT FOR AN ADDPfIONAL AMOUNT OF SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($7,000) FROM 3PECIAI. FUNDS, FUND N0. 33-4131-6023 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Counci] approve amended Contract No. 90-149 with FRA Services, Inc., Assessment District Management for an addi4onal amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) from special funds, Find No. 33-4131-6028. F1tA Services Inc. was originally retained for pmfeseional services in the area of assessment district administration and management. Staff feels that the services of FRA Services Inc. are necessary at this time, for analysis of the districts, for compliance with the new tax laws and the reporting of same for placement on the County's Tax Roll. Respectfully submitted, / `~~ arty B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBF:IYB:de ~9 n,mv nc. n w uwn r, ~r n nennrr_ e STAFF RFP~R,T DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'NeTi, City Engineer BY: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer n M., ;~ SUBJECT: VACATION OF A PORTION OF VINCENT AVENUE INCLUDING THE reques ...nun n~ nA1nn fh. aAiacant -C6,.c u yr. .. C:. 10-foot wide sidewalkeasement, located north of Jersey Boulevard, East of Red Oak Street RECdBENDATIOM Staff recomiaends that the City Cauncll adopt the attached resolution ordering the sumaary vacation of a portion of Vincent Avenue including the adiacent 10-foot wide sidewalk easement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 1, 1981, Parcel Map 6911 was recorded and a portion of Vincent Avenue Including a knuckle portion was dedicated to the City. On June 16, 1988, Parcel Map 10237 was recorded subdividing Parcel Map 6911. On Parcel MoD 10237, an additional 10-foot wide sidewalk easement was dedicateC to the City adiacent to the portion of Vincent Avenue dedicated on Parcel Map 6911. Under Preliminary Review 90-38, 1L was determined that said portion of Ytncent Avenue will no longer be a standard knuckle and the sidewalk easement will no longer be needed. Instead there will be a new alignment of Vincent Avenue beMeen Jersey Boulevard and Arrow Route and a 66-foot wide right-of-wary will be required on Vincent Avenue. The subject street right-of-way vacation is approximately 30-feet wide and 340-feet long and the sidewalk easement is approximately 30-foot wide and 340-feet long and located north of Jersey Boulevard and south of Arrow Route (See Exhtbtt "B'l. The subject proposed vacation 1s unimproved. The current owner of parcel 10 has given the City an irrevocable offer of street dedtcatlon, 33-feet wide measured from the centerline of future Ytncent Avenue (see Exhibit "C"). TAis irrevocable offer of street dedtcatlon will replace the subject vacation and will be recorded concurrent with the vacation. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT VACATION OF VINCENT AVENUE June 5, 1491 Page 2 On Mqy 8, 1991, the Planning Camission determined that said vacation would conform to the General Plan and reconwended the vacation occur. Section 8333 of the Streets and Highways Code states that local agencies may summarily vacate (by resolution) public service easements 1n any of the following cases: a) If the easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated for flue consecutive years (portion of Vincent Avenue). b) If the date of dedication is less than five years aM awrc than a year, and the easement was not used continuously since that date (adjacent sidewalk easement). Respectfully su ted, ~~~'C~ Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer MJO:NY:,jh Attachment ~/ RESOLUTION NO.~/ ~/3~j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE YACATION OF A PORTION OF VINCENT AVENUE INCLUDING THE ADJACENT 10- FOOT NIOE SIDENALK EASEMENT NHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8330, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City Street including the adjacent sidewalk easement herein Hare particularly described; aM NNEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that said portion of Vincent Avenue including the 10-foot wide sidewalk easement 1s unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes because the said street has not been used for which it was dedicated for five consecutive years and the said sidewalk easement was not used continuously since 1t was dedicated more than a year and less Lhan flue years. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ma ek s-i'i:s order vacating that portion of the City street including the sidewalk easement as shown on Map V-108 on file in the office ofi the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations an exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said por oEi~~he City street including the sidewalk easement no longer constitutes a street or public easement. SECTION 4: That the Cfty Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution-ia ~e recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shalt certify to the passage and adoption o~F~Fls resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. \_ ' c.~~ EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF VACATION THAT PORTION OF VINCENT AVENUE OF PARCEL 2 AS DELINEATED ON PARCEL MAP NO. 6911, RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 68r PAGES 41 AND 42, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TOGETHER WITH A 10 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENT AS DELINEATED oN PARCFJ. MAP NO. 30237. RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 128. PAGES 16-18. RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND SPATE. TER: EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SIDEWALK EASEMFNI' IS CONTIGUOUS WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID VINCENT AVENUE. - h'J'~'iF~jjj/ ~'OGiTc P,grPCEL /O OF /°M /0237 30~ST, DED/CAT/_ON PER PM 69// /O ~W S/DE{~Y/iL/t EAJEME//i PER PM /027 ~/E/?SEY E3LV1 ARc/1 TO BE l/.4C.4TE0' CI'I'1' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EtiGLTIEEFtIiYG DIVIn'ION p~p~~ IV rrEM: V- /48 ~A~rncw c,~i°~eno~v~~ TITLE: Viycsvr~r/ . /n/c~uoiN!- s/W EigsL~-iE7~T EXHIDIT: '~ B " `~ ARROW RoUrE _ „•~~ ~ ;~- ,,-• ,.,~.,. W Q W v PARCEL . /O OF P. M. /027 J .93~/RRE 1/OCABLE OFFER OF De0/cAr/oN /Eh~SEY BLVD. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbSONGA ENGLrIEERLtiG DNIbTON Vpv,~ id 1TEDi: V- /08 EXh'[BI't~ " C ~~ n,mv nc o ~ w,n an nx+n , vnvn , SfiAI'T: REPOR'T' '. ., DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the Ctty Council Jack Lam, A1CP, City Manager FROM: Mm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Judy Acosta, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN pOREEMENT FROM JOE AND CARLA BENTIVEGNA FORA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, LOCATED AT 7805 SIERRA VISTA I It 15 recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing the same to record. The developers, Joe and Carla Bentlvegna requested a building perwit for a single family residence located an the eastslde of Sierra Vista, north of Camino Sur. The Municipal Code requires that either public improvements be constructed or a lien agreement for the future construction of the public improvements be processed with the issuance of a building perwit. Bue to the configurattao of the intersection of Camino Sur and Sierra Vista, the lack of other public Improvements to match grades with, and the fact that tMs development has only 12 feet of property frontage ad,~acent to the public right-of-why; requiring public improvements a4 this time would be impractical. Therefore, the developers have submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the future construction of the improvements on the east side of Sierra Vista ad,~acent to their property, at such time the City deems it is practical. A copy of the Agreement is available 1n the City Clerk's office. Respectfully s tted,~• L ~ (~- NJO:JA:~h Attachment RESOLUTION-110. / ~ - ~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROYElENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM 30E AND CARLA BENfIYECNA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements far construction of public improvements to conlunctTan with building permit issuance; and i liidiT ai.;u0 ui ai as my vii-$1 LO I~roYaQaLa aglaC@OL W the property to be developed established as a prerequisite to Issuance of a building penult for 7805 Sierra Ytsta has been met by entry 1rto a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement Dy Joe end Carla Be1tlregna. NOM, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON611, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES to accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lten Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the Ciq~ Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record setae to the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. ~ ~ -l CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DIVISION RED 7B~SSierrt.//sib Mme; inn .oar m n EX1#BIT• ;~ ~g V ie d`' ~'w ~,.` IS N ,. IS ,I• `~\ ~,;H ~ , ~ ,,o yo .4 e ~.: ,+ i _ m ~p n qq ~~ _ X12 •12 i3 I ." ~" (IC D 9 9 a ~I I~ Ii ~- O ~ e n ~. c• _ -_-..._ _- \~ - I~9\' rf •a _-. - --~{E~sF s,a6 ___ as a{ ~ 18 ,~~ ~:a+~'L~ i~r a ~" I ~aq 32 \y x m ~,., es -~'I" ~ N 1~ ~`~ ~• P1 J a4R I ~ Qtt` n 7735 33 : set ` v' ~'1 -----_-_{~y~ H //~~ ~~ • i ~ "J ..S je 1 n ~~ 3/ Rnc 19 6 ,f 1 nr rr Rave ~h~ D ^. .., 5 6 ~" ~^~ Qua I I K "I M~A \ N 31 ~~~ `.a ~~~: 1 29 __ .v 1 3j~ 7~ ® 1 y,'ae ~7/ 7 s~ L u 20 z• u 4 zi ~ y ~~ --.... '~ ~R - - MaRI~fF ~ 'I 1._ w ps a, . a y as J ewe • a 1 a se .. rT ~ . ~ ~7, ry ° i. ~ y ~ n i a~,,` ~ ® 2z '1 ®zs ^I I ®zi ~ ®zs a/ ~Pro~r~l-~r Fron~-aye ti SITE CITY OF RANCIliO CtICAMONGA ENGMrEERING DIVISION ,,.,rte 39 i~ 7fiD.SaSierr~ Vi.%fm ~E; l inn Aara_r_m~n~- EXF~IT: - "F~ " CITY OF RANCHU CUCAMONGA ~fiAFF KEFQRT DATE: June 5, 1991 F~~ `~ U~ T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council 1977 City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Junior Engineer SU&IECT: REJECT ALL B[05 FOR THE SIERRA MADRE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED FROM AKRON ROUTE TO NINTH STREET RECOMMENDATION It Is recommended that the City Council reject all 61ds, without prefudlce, for the Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvements, as De1ng non-responsive to the needs of the City. BACK6ROUMD/ANALYSIS Pursuant to previous Council action, bids were soltclted, received and opened on May 16, 1991, for the subject protect. Staff has reviewed tM! bids and found that the bids received exceeded the amount budgeted. In addition, proposals were received from surveying and soils consultants for the project and found to exceed the budgeted amount. Plans and specifications will be carefully checked for possible revisions and re-bid. Engineer's Estimate (145,926.60 Apparent Law 61d 5148,320.80 ADDarent Second Bid 2155,910.77 Therefore, it is recommended that all bids be rejected. Staff will be requesting authorization to readvertise at a later date, after reviewing the budget to deterslne tf this project can be readvertised as 1s. Respectfuily subm ted, NJO:LRB:sd Attachment cc: Purchasing Planning l - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S~'AFF REPORT' DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Ma{yor, and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: (WARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT fOR ARRON ROUTE BRIDGE IPPROYEMENT PROJECT, LOCATED AT CUCAMONGA CREEK FOR THE AMOUNT OF 5370,410.26 (5336,736.60 PLUS lOf CONTINGENCY), TO BE FUNOED FROM SYSTEMS OEYELOPMENT FlINn arrnmr un „ .~„ ,.,,., . ACCOUNT N0. 24-4637-8775. ~~-• _- ~~°~~~°" ^^u Fnu Funu RECONENDATION executlon,cth~e contractafor Arrowi~ute Bridge Improvement Profeetzto tl~ lowest responsive bidder, Bonadtman-McCain, Inc. far the amount of f336,736.60 and authorize the Adainistrattve Services Director to expend (370,410.26 (5336,736.60 plus lOf contingency), to be funded from Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22-4637-8738 and FAU Fund, Account No. 24-4637-8775. BACIC6AgiMD/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 23, 1991, for the sub5ect pro,lett. Bonadiman-McCain, Inc. 1s the apparent lowest responsive bidder, with a 61d amount oP 5336,736.60 (see attached 61d summary). The Engineer's estimate was f369,DOp.00 (5335,445.50 plus l0E contingency). Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and to accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has Completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid doclwents. Respectfully s/u flied, ~\~~ Nm. Jce O'Net Ct ty Engineer WJO:LRB:1y Attachment cc: Purchasing ~I o a o e o n n = o,o ooOa "b SS ~.$S25 S8~ „'g-, }~~gg."'., i°.~ $ $ SQg g ~~~0$qSq$ 88~ mi~S~gnSti~a 8 `ayy8~~n w.Ni a~ N N ~ ti» ~p N M~y ~yy~ ~ N N R m b 0 d F ~N~NN N N N~KbPN pNNNNNN na+p.~.~ 7 N NN V~ ~ S S S C SC S C O S S S b tb~ O S O S S b S S S N V S 0 0 8 N~ h N vaJS Q~jSp.NiNtlGS.Ni SObf SN8 ti S NNti N8 a q y ~ N p~ypN N N a0 N WNNtD ON ~ N G G N N N H ~ C N N W t- •ti p N p 88S8S~pSgpbp8SQQO ppO SSbpS8SSQQSQQStpOp NStOSyJ S bn yNOSp pSBp Q ~ O b tp ~O N tD G O ~O V! ~ti~JJ eOe~ff O ~1~p0p G ~V~yyl N 10 C Vi VJ N I(~] ^ T !Npp`~ e`~ N ~ F ~'~ ~ p q ~ ~ M N N N~ N N N M w w M N N W N N N N A Wmti ^ W Cr1 O O S S p Sp p S p So pSp S S b p Sp~~ S S p S O O p Np O p S ea+ N O O S O W $ N N W b S Q 8 b M N N O S app N e C pK4YMNM1111Nb000O MGN OM~NN TN»M~Np ptlO .a ] p p N N M N N N .Ni N M O W 'O m O ppO,~j q 4a dd ~ ~ ..7U F[~ "~ ~~ ~ ~.S VI VI ~.l ~a~ u].7 LC W W N V1 ..7 .7 .1 x 9 iA .. ~p ~ N N m t7 N N vi N N N~ T M N N 'r ~ .-~ b ti~ N~~ ti .w b b ~ N C a ~$oawm~ ~z~ ~ ~ ~ v dC7 's C7 9'~ n~ mqU m m s a C70 ~ .~ m' m e.r ~.o Gb33U d:s~ u '~ ~U o G~ C7 n ~ ~ 'y, u c a e ~ i3 C K7 S ~°'ga~3 cC7 N3 a~ ~s ~ = $ " a~ a LC ~ ~o~ u >ti ;8 Jl 3 ~ m0. ~ C firp^ o~ gi ~ fir" ~.c°> d(~ r'y 3 C>~ W a dQ .~ 3a 2 0 ~",~ " n > (S,' 'tl y$J, ~~j m ~zW 33 oU.~°G m e~ cv u m ~trTj~~~~ m c E °~~mE ~U~dCUCimciae~am°'ce`o'~'$.7CCg°r~ v ~ 2 a.e ~a> ~ n >U Pi ~j P.. ~ c 3a'ry~ ~~'v~i j~V ~v ~Doaidcia°jc~aad~o:°~oci~<<9,~b:'3N~a~,'~m ~Z ~+N m e amn m m.°r.i.°..°~,.Y..1°n w~. w w $ w~ ~~c~ ~ n ~~ ~m~SP ~ V N `+O ~Dm ~~g b'~~'s`.~° SRSB ~~ saa ~~ ~~~~ k~b'b's ~~~~~~,~~~Ca ~ ,. ,, ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~' v O O O$ Y 1~-~ to O W a~ m C"F" rmrnc~ooo ~ro~~~~:~;.a:eKKk c~ 0 N ° ?~~~ooao~~$oo ~~^- }~~j g g S~ M g y 8~ g y S~ g N g 4 gP g Ytq OUP P rP~pWy 00 ~~Gp OSi ppU~~ CY OY~~ O~ O~ O A Cf P O O O O O O g $8$88$$$$$$8 yy~ yp~~ 6 (y~Y N O N N N N U1 y C~ GNj W ~ y 01 01 V O iP Ol O1 O O) O fn O Op 88o$i8a888888 M N N Y r N NNNN p~}~ y~ ?+ N N N (J N tD p NW {pNp N p ~l iNT C ~Op! ~i.~ ? C~ CT Q y O P ?+ pO O C O V C N H Op~i p8' Qpp p p p O O SOOOfyii 000000 s ~' a7 w a m p a ~. m a g. 8 ~. M~ C ~Oy b a yS W 'C O g 'm a E r ~MM I~1 Q .~ vro ;o a ,~ ' aaasaaa F p~`~ww~~ u C '~ 558888~ppg8qp8p ~ 8.1pi N bN M~rt ti N N N l~ y~ r+ O NN~ a N CC p p p O O O S O S 6 9 ~~$~~g~ v Nnn-~ y F p N N M ^ N V D '" m $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 U »a~g~~ V r525258~25,$$8~23~258nc388S`t', ~~o`~om`a~~a`~"+_~bi~X~o~i'b'ti~v''8io,.i4Q `~pw apYi pw a~~a°~ ~iw NCN pw wNw`.r~pw .Naw S O O O S S S S S S V! 8 p S 0 t- NOS S C pp b ~p!p C N O O °f O p p p pp pp N V~ O .r N OD '+ N N b N M n r NON $ N N N .r M b ti ~° N N N N ^I C ~° N ti N n T N W p N N N N N O1 H p p p p p p p pN y~ y~ pp pW pN 8 0 0 0 S O O O O O Oi O S S S V •° b O S N~8~~~~yy ~m~yy~a~~~yy~~8N~w~~~~~~~pp~ N^~ M M N N N N~ N N N N N N .~i N W .Ni p p p p p ~j YY~~ p pN NN 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 8$ 1m O S 8 N C •O N S S ~~p~~~~sss~~~~~~~~~b~ N ~y NN~ NNN N N.Ni N K N ati~~r~r~1. a7 r~~avi~~a~~aoi~c~c~~~`iidr°i;aa~ ~ N N M cq N N G! N N N V O ti N N .y m n N rM.+ N tV p CV rl 'I rl ~y l~ i7 ~° m M ~m ~NO C~ a d$ ~°~~ ti 3~ m ~z~ 4z~ m~c;E° G ~ppU ° :c ~~ e~p a`~ my "~~"'~ ~~39o m3~ v ~ ~~ _ $ u 3 c C7 3 m V ~ ~' G 6 °a r~~ ° ~' C~7 ~' ~ ~ ~ > d ~ $ r ~ ~ > > W a q •~'.°'7 0.a ~ °-3 .UC ,T ~ m _ e ~o ~1 e~eGG'~V m ~z W~ o V?~$;a ~~`+~ ~+ m m~ e~v 0.' d o E ~'p ~ ~ `~ C7 ~ u ~ V ti m ti ~ ,~ ~, pap m ~ S e o ~ y, ~ S U 0.u' m ~ o ~ m u U U O V$ o fK ~ c 2 s > ti k m c ~ yam. Qj nyp>Lj L4 ~j P._ ~ pc _pp $qq.-p•.~~fS ~pJ R: V }m~ U o-7. U6~~UP4 V C4 i°w~tiiD VN6/R .x' br1O+~CV F°0.[~S ~zl ,..N»e bfOFm m°,~ry.°3 .V. '°.w.nn .°'°.~tB c~~'i ~°33o1~r .. `"/ 8i~.~~~Y~~::'6ffib8 ~~~~ ~~ o. ~~e~~~~~~~~s ~~~s~~~g~~~ ~ ~ a II ~ g ~ ~~ E"E" ~+p,rnc,onn ~'aNN~NNgu pN O Op O Pp O Op Op Op TS Op Op Op Op S 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0 0 W y~N N NN1p+ yy N Ol fNJ N oNl bN+ ~ W ~ fa Nl W i ^~ pp m WWp O ~O ~P O ~88 ppppff Lpp~ N to H OO pO pOp pA pOp pOp Opp Op Op pp ~ O S 8 S O S O 9 0 0 0 0 S S N 00 N N m H~ ~pp A p~p~~ O+ ENu fD O N O ~+ OD N 0 0 0 ~' O c4i$ a o g$g~g $gg 4i N MM ~ ~ ~pp NN N u A m ¢¢ W.fNp 4i ONi ~ppD;; ~, Clt ra 0 o g~,Sl ,of°i ,~' a $b ~,Sw',°o ''/'/1` $ gggg g~gggggS 1 n R n S 8 C a n 88=8888 884~'88Q8888888888~588 Ali PI .g 0 O b .~ 0 yVT W f 0 b 3 ;o a r. Y d i m r 0 0 .C d W ~QQ rl 8 a•1 ~~8 p8 Y'J 8 ~8SN OTC t~CY (M~rCySN 81N tO~{NMM µV ~M w~b NVVVp tYKDGG IINN~ NNN NNNgwNWYiNNNNNMNNw~ 8S S 8 pa goµ p g g 8 g C g~ n w 8 g 8 QuD• 8g g 8 g 8 p g g w g g 8 u 8$ O N W NpN OD V 8 NMN8 M~NO NO N~O,~ NNMNiD O K N lPN wYG tD N wM S O O~ O 8 O 8 0 S 0 8 0 N O S O b 0 C O O~ 0 0 0 O ~s~s~~sy$ s~s~~~ra~s~~~pmpp~~y~~Ns~s m' niNM~ O!'! ~~ ub ~ H N tp a P. n'N NN~t'pq t~.-i b iNNN ~~MN^NN~+ N NN 800.~iSSppO p 8~ Ota~-J yNM0p0o0p~ pO.~NiHpN.pNi~OHpO epi ~+i tN~Cy~S p8 O~N WMGD N~O CM~O N eWOMNNN~O WNMNNr-IN ~f' N ~N pt[p~ tV~J~NNNM F^I ~ N N N N N N M acS~~~r~ttrdi ~~.7vivi~.i~..i.~vi.i~~uiv5ai.i~~ b M~y 1p N V p ip Ol M N N i J N~~ V C la N ~,j ey ~ '1 N~ N~ ~N N r-1 ti N N Of N H L- t+l 1ICC CV Gp ~ N p C e°iw m v a ~ ~z . .z~~ _~° pa ~~ c9 a a 3^ c~ 3 s '$~ d~ a y g a ~3 3" .per °; m caq^• ~'m p qko~ ~~~~~C7 m~c~cit'nU m N6 m 3g a o•~,~~xS~ •c ~~~~ m~~ mti~ti~~"sm~ p~ a °"~ ~ g~ v ~ n??~ a ~ti~ja b` a~3 ~•~c$iv~cni~ci~d 6po2~a~o~c~4ama:o~~oc33<33Xe~3~,~oa~m ^IN y`I b'L I~aD m n MrN"1N HN NNtiN CAN pi N~N NN ~~ m ~~~~~° ~g ~ 4 a _ ~ ~ ~. W ~~++ ~7a 0 oe~~i ~ S+$ mu +~+~ G C"F' rcnrnnnoc~ C p c ~. « yyqqpp ~p a ~ m N~> O O~ O 01 O tD O P tp g $88a88o88888 $ ~ 3 a~ P }~-~3~i Nq~y~N C~i c«n «f8ii mq~p~~.~. py ~' OaD OpI pO pO ~ OCR GO ~ O N CO pP pN ~ '• p P O O O O O O O S S O O O y~^• Y pp MM pp pp pp rrryyy~((( 0 0 ~ po pP p~ pO pO pO pO pO pO O pO n 8 0 0 0 O O O O O O S O m yy~~ yy~~ NN yb r O~ O N~NUbO~m OI Of A p 888~~o~~8do~ ~ ~ 888$88888888 ~~ o aasa$8x 888888888Se888°°$88S ° oao n 3 ~~yg~g~pp~~s~~~qq ~~{y+J8ae~~N~Ng~~~~m~~a~pp~~~~~ F N N M N N N g N N M N N N p N N W K~ N K p W K ~Qd V p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p Q ~.f~C~ 00O0 $0 p0 p0 C0 pO GpB~pp ppp pp pp m pOpp t~~i 1~1J000 8O 0. q CL OVJ N b 000 8 cb~NMN~ObpMb N 8K8 rmr N NN.Nr ~ 80 U ~ ~ K N N NN NNW N p N N N ~' p N N N N N N N N p mW ~ p p p p OO p p CC p p p CC CC OO pp pp pp pp pp CC CC ^ $ S 8 8 8 S S O O O S O O O O O O O O S U O O O O O O ~ o ~ a~~~$ss ~spsp~~y~~Y~st~J~~$~g~~~~_~$$ ye ~7 F p~pp pN pN p~p~N pN p~pNNNp~pN pN pM pNNpM pN pM NON pN pN tp°pN yyy 0$aCy ,qy~i~ OcO ~Oa ~OCM pO CO e~ OeOOt~v~byOOeOO O~p°O cO CO cN CO gybe OpOMO (y ° p.~ ~MNN`~ b m0 ~t~O t+OS ~MN8 N ~O N gp8 N OMMNN8 g o ~ ~ VNy~~ NNnj NN~ O NLV » CCf .-C NM ~~yy R ~ N N N » M N MN 'O~ W a Q ~ .7 C) FF ~'"'~ ~^.741 ViW a~r1 .741 ..7 ~ ~ V1y 41 .7 .7 .1 y8 W D ccpp ~~po tp A N N b'i .) N N M N N N ~ V A N ~j ti m .y p ti M N m~ .y .~ N cV b 00 m ~ ~o c~ .~ ~ ~gz~r; ~y ~ a vd~ viio~gvya`A m b 3 $ ~z m _z~~ m~°o' a ~ gg v m~s~ ~y:°~ ° s'm ° ~ ~ a m~ $mp a u m'`' 90" r ` ~ ~~ c Q{i ~ ~ mc~i ° n ~ .'. a ~~ a mU m 3 ~ c ~ ~ a $Pi8~3ac~ N3mc~d5~~~8 m$.g~ a W fi a +~ $ ~~ Cp .~7 oC~ ~'f'.~ C> Cy pG~y~:°7 3~ E U~' y o~ ai ~ ~ UmE7"K~a ~j dGj q, ~~°.~°P'er~~"~'B~meE ~''g ~CI~g~UCJmUyeYP,m a'~ee~'wx V°P~. $ ~~g3 a~ a>~a~a~~ e. $^ ~ ,° ma's c ~Poa~~cio~c3dmw:a..mc3~d'~R~n..3N:°a~m tiz ,. Nm • nmt~m m ti,^.~.N. .°J. w ww.~r w.mn$ a ~~ o~ c~~ ~i ~g ~~F~~~d~ ~~~~~~~ag~g~s ~~~~~~gs~s~~~ ~~mp E~; °'~a °~ R c N -"i mo~"b' ate, .+ ee~gmo-.m s'maE'+8 r~ r~,rnnooo E N M M~ N~ w 888888888888 ~ $~o~~s~s~s~s ~ s ssssasssssss p~ (N~ QN p C C m pO UNpiO Opl ~mj Op~pp pp pa pB pO ~S 8 OOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ O°n My~ MyMy M a~ ~7 ri U 4~1 Nm«m>dQ Oa Oo O 6 p ~~oo~aa~~~8~ ~ fp3W $ 8°o8o88S88888 ° e: a 8 O ~. ,e' e °° 7. (8: O - ----- CITY OF RANCHO CCCAMONGA STAFF REPdRT "' DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayar and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL ANO EXECUTION OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT N0. 5 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE MASTER AGREEMENT N0. STLPP-5420 Fqt THE ~inin - I,UI.AL INANJYUIfIAI ION PARINERSMIP PR06RAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE t)F CALIFORNIA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MILLIKEN AVENUE UNDERPASS AND STREET IMPROYEMENTS BETWEEN 6TH STREET AND JERSEY BOULEVARD. THE SUPPLEMENT SETS THE STATE REIMBURSABLE PORTION OF THE PROJECT AT 1996,096.00 AND THE CITY'S PORTION AT 53,645,634.00. REIMBURSABLE FUNDING FROM THE SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED TO THE SB-140/FUND 35 ACCOUNT. RECOMMENDATION It 1s hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the attached resolution that authorizes the execution of program Supplement No. 5 to Local Agency -State Master Agreement, STLPP-5420 for the State - Local Transportation Partnership Program and a certified copy of said Resolution along with the executed original copies of said program supplement be sent to the State of California for their execution. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached herewith are the duplicate original copies of the above subtect Program Supplement Na. 5 to Local Agency - State Master Agreement STLPP- 5420 for the State - Local Transportation partnership Program. June 15, 1989, the City applied for the State - Local Transportation Partnership Program thru Cal trans to help construct the subtect protect. The Protect was field reviewed by Caltrans and City personnel on May 3, 1989, an an application for matching the funds was accepted 1n June 21, 1989. This program supplement provides the reimbursable funds for the Construction of the Mt111ken Avenue Underpass and associated Street Improvements. The supplement sets the State reimbursable portion of the Drotect at f996,096.00 and the City's portion at 53,645,634.00 5v CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUPPLEMENT N0. 5 - MILLIKEN AVENUE UNDERPASS AND ST. IMPROVEMENTS JUNE 5> 1991 PAGE 2 Reimbursable funding from the Supplement Agreement shall be disbursed over the next 3 fiscal years as follows: Fiscal Year 90/91 E124,539.00 Fiscal Year 91/92 5498,157.00 Fiscal Year 92/93 f373,400.00 Said reimbursable funds as received will be deposited into the 58-140/Fund 35 Account. Respectfully subml,CtBd, ~~ NJO:JADay Attachment 5~ RESOLUTION N0. ~'I ~~3 p A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT N0. 5 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE MASTER AGREEIENT N0. STLPP-5420 FOR THE STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION Of THE MILLIKEN AVENUE UNDERPASS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETNEEN 6TH STREET AND JERSEY BOULEVARD NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hci diiid °t~, icim .cJ w as "Lwoi wyen~y"~, ima iur ii.a wnsiueraa on and execution the Program Supplement No. 5 to Local Agency - State Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program authorizing reimbursement of State Share Funds for the construction of the Milliken Avenue Underpass and Street Improvements between 6th Street and Jersey Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Transportation, District Office 8 (hereinafter referred LO as "State") processes and monitors State funded pro,)ects; and WHEREAS, as a condition to reimbursement payment of State Share funds for said pro,{ects, the Local Agency shall approve and execute said Program Supplement No. 5. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, does hereby resolve to: 1. Authorize the Execution of program Supplement No. 5 to Local Agency -State Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State-Local Transportation Dartnership Program for the reimbursement of State Share Funds for the construction of the Milliken Avenue Underpass and Street Improvements between 6th Street and Jersey Boulevard. 2. To authorize the Mayor to sign said Supplement and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this Resolution, as well as type in the Resolution Number and date 1n the blanks in the Lh1rd block of said Supplement and for the return of the original copies of said Supplement to the State of California Depar4aent of Transportation along with the certified copy of th15 Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Local Agency shall also comply with the "Special Covenants or Remarks" attached to said supplement including: ~~ RESOLLnION SUPPLEMENT N0. 5 - MILLIKEN AVENUE UNDERPASS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS JUNE 5, 14^1 PAGE 2 1. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract may have been written before ascertaining the availability of legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parttes, 1n order to avoid program and fiscai delays that would occur if the agreement were executed after that determtnatlon was made. The total amount of State-Local Transportation Partnership funds payable by the State shalt not exceed 5996,096.00 to be encumbered and reimbursed as follows: FY 90-91 ;124,539.00 FY 91-92 5498,157.00 FY 92-93 ;373,400.00 This agreement is valid and enforceable only 1f sufficient funds are made available by the California State Legislature. Any subsequent State Partnership funding changes will be made Lhrough a revised finance letter. \-i4~ 53 - "~ ~ ~ ~ •Date: May 2, 1991 • PROGRAM 8OPPLEMENT NO. 005 Locations 08-SBD-O-RCUC to Project Number: 8891-5420(294) STATE-LOCAL TRANBPORTATION E.A. Number: 08-955319 P.a.RTNERBBIP PROGRP!! AGRSE258HT NO. BL•TPP-5430 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the State-Local Trans- portation Partnership Program Agreement for State Share Funds which was entered into between the Local Entity and the State on /2 //9 /9o and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article i of the aforemen- tioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Local Entity on (See copy attached). The Local Entity further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with any covenants or remarks setf orth on the following pages. PROJECT TERMINI: MILLIKEN AVE-6TH ST TO JERSEY BLVD TYPE OF MORE: STREET & BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LENGTH: 0.0 (MILES) PROJECT CLA88ZFZCATZON OR P8A88(8) OF AORR ' [Xj Construction/Construction Engineering/Contingencies Estimated Cost States Share Funds ~ Matching Funds FY91 $ 124,539 Local OTHER OTHER $ 4,641,730 FY92 $ 498,157 $ 3,645,634 $ 0 $ 0 FY93 $ 373,400 CITY OF RANC8OCUCAMONGA BTATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By By DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OB Date Date Attest Title - i heteEy [ere ify upon my p~naru l~)kn~Jw~rl Wp~e tnhrt, dtl9~tW fv~tl~ ~n rv~i1Wh for tMt mcuobrence: Accounting OfficexV /'~/'"I"mo/~'7 ~yQ,[sa(i( Date .S-o1.9~ $ 124539.00 [Aapter Ste[uros ~ Item Y u~- 9ro9rp ~BCI iuM Source ~ 6MWNT 467 1990 2660.107.042 90-91 20.25.070.100 C 258010 042•T 1X539.00 5~ 08-SBD-O-R000 SB91-5420(294) „~.,~...., CC`IEHAP!TS nR ocn+atZi(g DATE: 05/02/91 PAGE: 2 1. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract may have been written hefore ascertaining the availabil'_ty of legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur i! the agreement were executed after that determination was made. The total amount of State-Local Transportation Partnership funds payable by the State shall not exceed $996096 to be encumbered and reimbursed as follows: ni y~-~i v FY 91-92 498157 FY 92-93 373400 This agreement is valid and enforceable only ,if. suP£icient funds are made available by the California State Legislature. Any subsequent State Partnership funding changes will be made through a revised finance latter. ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the Ctty Cauncll City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer ~- ~ _ t ,~ BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector Iii-~~- SU&7ECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 12870, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE BETNEEN ETINANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY DALY HOMES REC01/EIDATION It is recaaoended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, . accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authoriz/ng the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSISI8ACK9l01gO Improvement Agreement and improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 12870 were approved by the Ctty Council on April 7, 1988, in the following amounts: Faithful Performm~ce Bond: ;1,373,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 686,500 The developer, Daly Homes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said tmprovement agreement in order to complete the necessary concrete repairs and cap pave the streets, which will occur after the last phase of houses are built. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the Ctty C1 ark's Office. Respectfully subm ted, ~~~~ Nm. Joe D'Ne11 City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachments ~k'J DALY HOMES (~ h C A L I h V K iv i t May 16, 1991 ~-. City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: Steve M. G11111ana Public Works Inspector RE: Tract 12570 - Improvement Extension Agreement Dear Steve: With regard to the Improvement Extension Agreement for Tract 12870, the storm drain channel is complete; all landscaping is complete with the exception of the northern community horse trail; all street improvements have been completed with the exception oP capping o£ the streets and removal/replacement of damaged existing improvements as requested by the inspector at a later date. The capping of the streets and removal/replacement of damaged existing improvements will not occur until the last phase of houses have been completed. Therefore, we would like your assistance in extending our improvement agreement for a period of one year. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, LY HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. Carol Hale construction/Sales Coordinator V 41661 Enterprise Circle NoAh, Suite 227, temeculc. CA 92390 (714) 694-1777 Fax' (714169: •. . RESOLUTION N0. G~/ ~/ 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROYING 1NPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANO IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12870 WHEREAS, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 5, 1991, by Daly Hanes as deveioper, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Highland Avenue between Etlwanda Avenue and East Avenue; and WNEREAS, the installation of such improvements. described in said Improvement Agreement end subject to the terws thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Trait 12870; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreeaent Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to 51gn said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 5~ ---- CITY OF RANCHU CUCAMUNGA STAFF REPORT GATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Litt' Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gi1171and, Public Works Inspector II`~_ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 12895, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE _OF BAKER AVENUE BETWEEN rWInAL tlUULCYN(U qmU gxgUm RUU IC, JUtlR 11CU D1 xgM,nV CITILAND DEVELOPMENT RECONEIDATION It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resclution, accepting the subfect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign Bald agreement. AWILTSIS/BACKGROUN6 Improvement A regiment and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public Improvements for Tract 12895 were approved by the City Council on February 2, 1989, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Perfoneance BonA: 5430,000 labor and Material Bond: 5215,000 The developer, Rancho C1t11and Development, 15 requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement In order to complete all street improvements in the last two phases. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 9n the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submlt~ted,, ~~~~ Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SNG:sd Attachments J ~~ F~A{VGFdO CIT(LAN~ DEVELOPMENT A California Limited Partnership 11965 Povere poad, Sella Fe Sponge, Cnlllamle 911670 Tel. (213! 8836111 May 20, 1991 Mr. Smve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector II City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 ~UBJF.CT: Improvement Agreement and Securities TraM No. 12895 Rancho Ctcamonga, California Dear Mr. Gilliland: The referenced off-site improvement agreement consist of certain works of improvements to be installed at the subject property. It consists of sewer main, storm drain, street pavement, catch basin, curb, gutter and etc. To this date, we have completed all major improvements including sewer main, storm drain, catch basin and street pavement, drive approach, sidewalk, curb and gutter for bats 1 and 2 in the amount of approximately $290,000.00. The items remain to be furished aze drive approach, sidewalk, street pavement, curb and gutter for Lots 3 and 4. Due to bad economic enduonment since late part of 1990 plus the mideast war early this year, sales on our project as well as all other real estate developments have been senously affected. Our second phase construction was temporarily halted for several months. As the war v: as over and national economy is slowly recovering, we are now in the process to complete our remaining portion of the project. We hereby request to extend the agreement for a period of one year so that we can finish our project. Your consideration in tltis matter is very much appreciated. Very duly yours, RANCHO CITILAND DEVELOPMENT .,v_-,-. ichaz E. Hu, General Partner REHIms ~~ RESOLUTION" NOo ! ! ~f ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12895 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 5, 1991, by Rancho Citiland Development as developer, for the improvement of puD11c right-of-way a4lacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Baker Avenue between Foothflt Boulevard and Arrow Route; and WHEREAS, the instaliatlon of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject t0 the terws thereof, is to be done in confunctlon with the development of said Tract 12845; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 7s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. -,=d' ~r ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT '^~ ` DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Ma. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector I1,.~~~' SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13281, LOCATED ON THE NORTHIIEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD I{I,V AVV„LiILn n,L„VL, JVVI~,IILV V, VV„nVl Vn ,IV ~U RECOMENDATION It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALVSIS/BACKGROUMD Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13281 were approved by the L1ty Council on May 17, 1990, 1n the following anounts: Faithful Performance Bond: =843,200 Labor and Material Band: 5421,600 The developer, Covington Raines, is requesting approval of a 12-month ~ extension on said improvement agreement due to the slow economy and 50% of the required improvements completed. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully su iSLed, ~~ Mn. Jce O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachments ~~ ~~ "~ Hone ~~ May 20, 1991 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATTN: Stephen M. Gilland, Public Works Inspector Communities Development Department Engineering Division RE: Exploration of Improvement Agreement for Tract No. 13281 Dear Mr. Gilland: I hereby request alt month time extension of the Improvement Agreement for the above referenced tract. This tract consists of 199 residential lots. At present we have completed approximately 50°1, of the improvements. As you are aware, the cons[r uction industry has been experiencing a very slow time during the current recession. Under no rural conditions this project would be built uut in four or five phases with a much higher absorption rate. However, due to current economic conditions and limitations required by the Lending institution on this project, current plans are to complete construr_tinn in 1~ separate phases with the lending institution dictating when each phase may start based on current sales. The lending institution will not fund the loan for completion of the improvements until such time as the remaining improvements are required, therefore, we respectfully request that the City grant the time eytension as requested above. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me immediately. Very truly yours, COVINGTON HOMES, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA / ~~~^..~"y7 `Cl~rle' s R~,11~ rX~ Vice President of Planning CRR:s11 VJ`~ _.. '. F u,an xJio rc 1~e!•, ~.. d, h:J'v• ~. •, ••.~,. '~_r.. •, i.~ %'y.ifi MI ,,. RESOLUTION~HO. y~ -~~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE C[TY COUNCiL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13291 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 5, 1991, by Covington Names as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,{acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally iocated on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue; and IMEREAS, the Installation of such Improvements, described in said Improvement Agreemm~t and sub~ett to the tenas thereof, is to be done in confunctton with the development of said Tract 13281; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~,- ~ - CITY OF RANCHO CIiCA:YtONGA ~TA~~ KEPaRT ;~ DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector I~ SUBJECT: APPROYAL CP IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT E1(TENSION FOR TRACT 13316, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE ~~~ ~.~.~~:~~ nm`~t nix......'... ~. _.... . .• r•, a x,'pl ,.v ui roicvMri riUliJ RECONEMDIITIdI it is recommended that .the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. AMAlVSIS/BACKBROIIID Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13316 were approved by the City Council ~r "4ay 30, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Perfoenance Bond: f4,215,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: 52,107,000.00 The developer, Frledaan Homes, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improve:aent agreement, in order to secure construction ft nanctng and complete all required improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available to Lhe City Clerk's Office. Respectfully subm~~/Y~+, ~~ Wm. Jce O'Neil L/ City Engineer WJO:SMG:Iy Attachments ~~ April 24, 1991 Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 Dear Sire; Friedman Homes entered Snto an Improvement Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Tract 13316 on Nay 30, 1990. Due to the severe housing slump and the lack of available construction f Snancing, we have not been able to start construction on the improvements Sn Tract 13316. Friedman Homes Ss hereby requesting en extension be granted for the Improvement Agreement for Tract 13316. We do not anticipate securing construction financeing for another 4 months and Alen on an a month construction schedule. Friedman Nomee respectfully requests a 12 month extension for the Improvement Agreement for Tract 13316. If there is additional information needed to process this extension, please contact me at (714) 987-1500. Sincerely, /! / , /i ) L ~~ 4 'Mike Blyd Pro,)ect Manager MB/es 10807 LAUREL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO ~ 91730 TEL: pl4) 9871500 FAR'l714 ~ 9H' :798 RESOLUTION N0. ~! .,/~~- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13316 WHEREAS, the City Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for Its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed ~n June 5, 1991, by Friedman Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,1acent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and ~.m rar; JL,YC1; Er1U WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described 1n saki Improvement Agreement and subfect to the terms thereof, is to be done in confunctton with the development of said Tract 13316; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which Ts identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and Bald Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~~ ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ItEP4~tT DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, an4 Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer n, ~~ ~ h'v~'f^ , ~~ BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SU&]ECT: APPROVAL ~ IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13441, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK Leuc dun vvuvnN WAY. SUBMITTED BY GRUPE DEVELOPMENT RECONMEIDIITiOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Cterk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACK6ROUD Improvement A regiment and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the pu611c improvements for Tract 13441 Were approved by the City Council on November 17, 1988, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: ;3D0,000 Labor and Material Bond: 2150,000 The developer, Grupe Names, is requesting approval of a 12-ngnth extension on said improvement agreement in order to conclte concrete repairs, landscaping and street paving. Copies of Lhe Improvement Agreement Extension are available to the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully sudeltted, ' ~~ Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachments IO V March 29, 1990 Steve ri. Gilliland r uuiaa, nuine a„nYcccor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. BoX S07 RanC:h~ Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Traot 13441 Dear Steve, MAV 0 8 1901 ~ ~f?~~~r~r,D CITY Uf RRNCHU CUCAMGNGA p i fa"!20100? C?'i G. ~i=. '.C4 We hereby request an extension of our improvement agreement for Tract 13441 in Rancho Cucamonga for the lollowinq reasons: 1) We are unable to complete the landscaping in all of the phases because the homes in the last two phases are not finished. 2) The curb and gutter repairs are not complete and ready for inspection. 3) The asphalt has not been finished and cannot be finished until the homes are complete. 4) The drive approaches are not complete in all phases. We expect that these improvements will be complete within six (6) months of the date aP this latter and request an extension Por that time period. Thank you. Cordially, i ~L F~CLVt i! n urr-- J n S. Gunniaen roj act Manager JSG:dl ompe lhrci~~p~nl ('~~mpim 4vthrrn GlJurnu I _'ul IA..c ~Irer. 0.im ^I MI Krv pm &aah, CA vj(N'U 'll '_~ pxn hu 'll ']blOtl RESOLUTION NO. ~~ f7~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13441 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaawnga, California, has for Its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 5, 1991, by Grupe Development as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adJacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon May; and WHEREAS, the 7nsta1latton of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subJect to the terns thereof, is to be done 1n con~unttion with the development of said Tract 13441; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. -~f ~~ ---- CIT]' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPUI~.T GATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Councii f City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector IL SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION FOR TRACT 13873, LOCATED ON THE NORTHNEST CORNER OF Ylr.7nm1• o•cv une nNU niwuW STREET, SUBMITTED BY ATNOOD VICTORIA JOINT VENTURE RECOIBENDATIOM It 15 recoawended that the City Council adopt the attached resoiutlon, accepting the subJett agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreexnt. AMALYSIS/BACKGR0111O Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the pu611c improvements for Tract 13873 were aDDroved by the City Council on May 17, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 572,000 labor and Material Bond: 536,000 The developer, Atwood Victoria Jofnt Venture, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said lmproveax!nt agreement in order to complete all off-site improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Offtee. Respectfully su ted, ~~ Iti~' ~ IAa. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachments ~/ DE\/~1-L l~dus9~ries, !nc• May 3, 1991 D _ r p,, „ city of Rancho Cucamonga ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Engineering Department ~~AY ? 0 ~,~,~, P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0607 ~~ ~ ~- ~:,,.; ~, ,,,, Attn: Steve M. Gilliland '~--~~- ..a. un~e.miw, ~,i araci i~u,d Improvement Agreement Dear Mr. Gilliland: Thank you for your recent letter notifying me of the pending expiration of the Improvement Agreement for Tract /13873. Due to negative economic conditions, construction on this project was not commenced until just recently. Rough Grading and underground improvements have been completed at this time, and I expect to begin surface improvements soon. To allow for completion of the street improvements and installation and energization of the Edison streetlights, I request that the city extend our Improvement Agreement and Engineering Division Construction Permit Mo. 4748 for 180 days from the original expiration dates. You will find enclosed a check for $251.00 and the Improvement Agreement forms required to process this extension request. Please all me at 818/986-3600 if you have any questions regardir~q this matter. Inc. act Jon Eicholtr ~~ RESOLUTION N0. r'J/'~~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13$73 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its constderatlan an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 5, 1991, by Atwood Yictorla Joint Venture as developer, far the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane end Atwood Street; and WHEREAS, Lhe insta11at1on of such lsprovements, described 1n said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done 1n con,~unctton with the development of said Tract 13873; and WHEREAS, said I rovement Agreeaent Extension is secured and accompanied by good and su~ficlent Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the C1ty Louneil of the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that Bald Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. i y' 73 - -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPdRT "' DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Meabers of the City Council Ctty Manager FROM: Mn. Joe O'Neil, City Englneer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspector II ~j~ =, SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EIfTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 9498 4TH STREET MEDIANS, LOCATED ON 4TH STREET EAST OF nnrtN Avtmut, 5UDMlTTED BY REITER-RINKER GIITENAY/HAVEN GATENAY PARTNERS RECDMIENDATION It 1s recommended that the City CauncTl adapt the attached resolution, accepting the sub,~ect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALVSISBACKGRDUO Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public teprovements for Parcel Map 9498 4th Street Medians were approved by the City Council on December 18, 1985, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 550,000 Labor and Material Bond: =25,000 The developer, Reiter-Rinker Gateway/Haven Gateway Partners, 1s requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said Improvement agreement in order to have sufficient time to have the design approved and construction to take place. The design 1s being reviewed by both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully su ted, Wm. Joe O'Neil ~~~ City Englneer NJD:$MG:sd Attachments J 7~ AflNEI May 22, 1991 City of Rancho Cucamonga N.O. Box 807 Ranchc Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Steve M. Gilliland Publk Worb Inapsetor Ra; IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EICTENSION Parcel Msp gI9E • FOURTH STREET MEDIAN Gentlemen: We are requesting a tweNa (12) month axtenslon of the Improvement Agreement for the Founh Street Median. The reasons for requesting the extension are es follows: 1. Market cond'Rions have retarded the overall pragross of the dovotopment. 2. The extension will allow Haven Gateway Partners timeto secure addRional financing and corriinue its program of phased developmem. Desian Status Willdan & Associates, Civil Engineers for the Ontario Center are preparing plans tar the Median improvements and will be submitting them to [he City of Rancho Cucamonga for plan checking. We are enclosing a check in the amount of 5251.00 and three copies of :he Agreement for the exension. Thank you for your coudosy and cooperation in this matter. Smcerely, ARNEL EVELOPMENT COMPANY ~~~~ John F, Biggs Vice President JFB:mm ?~~~ 5~~wh f'~~e~l Urne imtr U~I~ f'm~ )lee. ~'aLlem,e 9"fi'?E il{ '.{~ tOfll ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~(~/Y'J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ERTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 9498 4TH STREET MEDIANS WHEREAS, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on June 5, 1991, by Reiter-Rinker Gateway/Haven Gateway Partners as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way ayacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on 4th Street ease or Haven nvenue; ana WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described 1n said Improvement Agreement and sub3ect to the terms thereof, 1s to 6e done 1n conJunctton with the development of sold Parcel Map 9498 4th Street Medians; and YMEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ._j} ~~ ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAD70NGA STAFF i1rFP(iRT DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer F~. BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 11410, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROM ROUTE BETNEEN ~NGVFY aVCUI~C dun :'T mw ~~i`~~~` .-iiioniliGU D~ UI1M^M11YtN ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Ctty Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. AMALTSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Parcel Map 11410 were approved by the City Council on Aprtl I9, 1990, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5252,000 Labor and Material Bond: 5126,000 The developer, Utica-Haven Associates, is requesting approval of a 6-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully su ted, 'j7 ~1 .Q C.' / W ~l Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachments 77 UTICA-HAVEN ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 8577 Haven Avenue Rancho Cuc asonga, CA 91729 5/15/91 Steve M. Gilliland Public N'o rks Inspector Engineering Division Community Development Department City of Rancho ('uramnnea 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Extension of improvement Agreement for Parcel Map 11410 Dear Steve: Please use Chis letter as our request to extend the improvement agreement for parcel map 11410, for 6 months. This extension is necessary for completion of the following: 1. All Edison power undergrounding, Including the Haven .avenue & .arrow Highway crossings. The work is being done by the Edison Company and we are scheduled at the earliest date Edison has available. 2. Ilaven dvenue Street light relocation. This will not occur until tho :,di scn Pca~er uaderground.ng is compLate. 3, Construe lion of New right Hand turn lane, and stripping of .4 rrow Highway, This cannot be done before #1 & k2 above are completed. N'e anticipate the above work will be completed within 6 months. Please contact me at 1710 989-8890 if you have any questions. T'~h,/a/l/n1Nfk^',`'-YVAO'_uI ~~W,^W-~ / ' J Ludwig Ba rowoj Director of Development ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ y% %~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EJITENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL IMP 11410 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has far its consideration an laryrovement Agreement Extension executed on June 5, 1991, by Utica-Haven Associates as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Arrow Route between Naven Avenue and Utica Avenue; and iMEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described 1n saki Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, 1s to be done 9n conJunction with the development of said Parcel Map 11410; dnd WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified 1n said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Maiyor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamo~~ga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~_ ~,- 7~ --- CITY OF RANCHO C[JCAMONGA sTA~`F REPORT DATE: T0: FR01l. BY: SUBJECT: June 5, 2991 ~:. Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector Ii +~. Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 9498 Haven Avenue Medians, 1n~~~~I ~~ ~~~~„ ~'rc uuc 6~ YNI JL~CC4 RECOMMEM011TIOM: The required street Improvements for Parcel Map 4498 Haren Avenue Medians have been completed Tn an acceptable manner, and it 15 recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 566,500. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 9498 Haven Avenue Medians - located on Haven Avenue at 4th Street DEVELOPER: Reiter-Rinker Gateway/Haven Gateway Partners 950 South Coast Drive, Sutte 200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Release: Faithful Perfornmnce Bond (Street) f66,500 Respectfully submit !ha. Jce O'Neil ~~ City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachment OO RESOLUTION N0. ~( ~` Cr 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGII, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9498 HAVEN AVENUE MEDIANS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Nap 9498 Haven Avenue Medians have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying .,,c ..,,r,, c~,~y7~:e. NOW, THEREFORE, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer 15 authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. Ir ~( DnTE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: ---- CITY OF RANCHO CUCA'.NONGA STAFF` IMPORT ,~ June 5, 1991 Mayor, and Members of the City Council C1ty Manager No. Joe O'Ne11, City Engineer j Steve M. G11111and, Pub11c Works Inspector ~~--: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BOND FOR TRACTS 9399 AND 9400 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET BETNEEN BERYL ~T."..^ ...o iiia.Li'r',a n'iceuc RECOMElOAT10N It is recon~aended that the C1ty Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. The requfred one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects 1n amtertals and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Prado Corporation 1156 N. Tustin Avenue Orange, CA 92667 Release: Tract 9399 Tract 9400 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f4,900. 52,500. Respectfully submit ' Ma. Joe O'Ne11 ~ L~ C1ty Engineer MJO:SMG:Iy ~~ DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: - ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFFREF~DRT -'~" June 5, 1991 Mayor, and Members of the C1ty Council City Manager Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer I Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BOND FDR TAACT 12642, 12935-44 LANDSCAPE, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STIIEET I RECOM~IQATION It 1s recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements reawln free fray defects 1n materials and aarkmanshtp. DEVELOPER: Kaufman 6 Broad 180 N. Riverview Drive, SW to 300 Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S82,T00 Respectfully submi d, Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd ~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAb1ONGA 9TAF~' I~~YORT '. , DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SU&IECT: June 5, 1991 Mayor, and Members of the City Council Ctty Manager Nm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspecta~~~, RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BOND FOR TRACT 12936, LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF NILLVIEN LOOP AT KETTLE PEAK PUCE AND MT. RECOIIEIDATIOM It is recaaswended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. BACK6ROUM0/AN/LTS15 The required one year abtntenance period has ended and the street iaproveaK•nts regain free fraa defects in saterlals and rarknanship. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Developaent 6865 Airport Drive Riverside, CA 92504 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) f10,800 Respectfully subol ted, (N v~ Wta. Jce O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd ~~ ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA fi ;~ STAFF REPORT . ,s DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Wm. Jce O'Neil, City Engineer 8V: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MNINTENANCE BOXD FOR TR11CT 12938 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SiOE OF TERRACE VIEW LOOP BETWEEN MINERAL PEAK COURT sNn MMMOIM PEAK COURT. RECOgENDATIOM It is recoauended that the Clty Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGIlOUD/ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects In materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Development 6865 Airport Drive Riverside, CA 92504 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond iStreet} 513,960. Respectfully submitted, Ma. Joe O'Neil ~~~~ City Engineer WJO:SMG:Iy ~~ ----- CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA ~ ~fiAFF R~Fi)Rr ' DATE: June 5, 1991 ~ ' T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Ma. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Morks Inspec SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BOND FOR TRACT 12939 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HILLVIEN LOOP AT T10GA PEAK COURT, PIKES PEAK bYYpl ,4,U pC11LC IC/M fLI,YC. REC01/EMOIITION It is recomaended that the City Council authorize the Ctty Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND/ARALVSIS The required one year maintenance riod has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects 1n awtertals and rrorkaianship. DEYELOPER: Marlborough Development 5865 Airport Drive Riverside, CA 92504 Reiease: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S8,S00. Respectfully su ted, ~ '' `` ~~v~ Nm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy J 8~ --- CITY~+rO~F,(R~AiNCHyO~C1U'yC~yAMrO~NGA :7 itiZ'~ ibli l-V~l DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: i1 ~`` Mayor, and Meebers of the Ctty Council City Manager kfi. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, PuD11c Works Inspector r RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BOND FOR TRACT 12943 LOCATED ON THE EAST S[DE OF HlLLYIEW LOOP AT PIKES PEAK COURT AND TIOGA PFAK rnIM7 I4 is recomaended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BN'.KGROIND/ANALYSIS The required one year ~aaintenance period has ended and the street improvea«'nts reautln free front defects 1n saterlals and worksanshlp. DEVELOPER: Marlborough Developuent 6865 Airport Drive Riverside, CA 92504 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 510,900.00 Respectfuily suda~.tted, Win. Joe O'Neil ~~ City Engineer ill.../// W10:SMG:Iy 8~ ---•--- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 5, 1991 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Coundl City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Giililand, Public Norks Inspecto~~~, SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BOND FOR TRACT 13560, LOCATED ON THE HEST SIDE OF NETHERLANDS VIEN LOOP AT MT. STERLING COURT AND Mi. LASSEN COURT It is recommended that. the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. B/1CKGR011NO/MIALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free Prom defects to materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Mari borough Development 6865 Airport Drive Riverside, CA 92504 Release: Naintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 56,500 Respectfully suMattted, Nm, Joe O'Neil ~C~ City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd 8~" ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT OgTE: June 5, 1991 , T0: Mayor and Menbers of the City Council City Manager FROM: Ma. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works inspector SUBJECT: EEABTASSIDE ~OFN BERYL BSTREET BETWEEN 3619TH~ASTREETN AND ii.~Y~l TMI avsu~IF REL018E1DATION It is recoaoended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACK6ROIIID/ANALYSIS The required one year aalntenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in wterlals and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Hix Development 437 South Cataract Avenue N2 San Dimas, CA 91773 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S21,DD0.00 Respectfully su ted,C^ Ma. Joe O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:Iy ~~ - CITY OF RANCHO l'UCAMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: T0: FROM: BY: SU&IECT: June 5, 1991 Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager iAn. Joe D'Nefl, City Engineer tarry Dyer, Associate C1vii Engineer , i THE SETTING OF A PUBLlC HEARING DATE OF JULY 3, 1991, FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REYIEN FOR THE PROPOSED HAVEN AVENUE REHAOILITATION PR0.IECT, 4TH STREET TO NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. 1lECONEMOATtOM It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution for the setting of a Public Hearing on the City Council's meeting date of Hednesday, July 3, 1991, for the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation Protect, Environmental Assessment Review and that Tt directs the City Clerk to submit an Environmental Assessment Notice for advertisement to the Oaily Bulletin 6y Hednesday, June 12, 1991, for a one-t/me publication on Friday, June 21, 1991, ten calendar days prior t0 Bald public hearing date pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQAI requirements. BACKGROUIN/ANALYSIS This report presents the Engineering Staff's request to set a Public Hearing date for the above subtect Environmental Assessment Review. Said Assessment Review is in conformance with CEQA requirements and shall render an environmental evaluation of the City's proposed Haven Avenue Rehabilitation Protect. Respectfully subRf.tted,~~~ NJO:JAD:Iy L/ Attachments 9~ RESOLUTION NG..if~ 1~ ~ Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 7HE CYTY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF WEDNESDAY, JULY 3, 1991, FOR THE PROPOSED HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION PROJECT, 4TH STREET TO NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW WHEREAS, the City Council hss directed the City's Engineering Staff and DGA Consul tinq Engineers to proceed with formal designs for the Improvement of Haven Avenue from 4th Street to north of Foothitt Boulevard. WHEREAS, said proposed improvement requs res an 2nr i,4aw~fitGl Assessment: and WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental pualtty Act, as amended. NON, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves and public hearing date of Wednesday, July 3, 1991, at 7:00 p. m. to be held at the City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Council Chambers, 10500 Ctvtc Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California for the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation ProJeet Environmental Assessment Review; and Section 2: The Ctty Clerk 15 directed to submit the attached City of Rancho Cucamonga nvironmental Assessment Notice for advertisement to the Da11y Bulletin Dy Wednesday, June 12, 1991, for a one-time publication on Friday, June 21, 1991, ten calendar dalys prior to said public hearing date pursuant to the California Environmental Duality Act (CEQA) requirements. ~( CITY OF RANCHO~CUCAHONGA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOTICE A complete Environmental Assessment has been prepared for the following pro,)ec t. The City Council will be considering these assessments, staff's recomlendation, and public input, at their meeting of July 3, 1991, prior to making a final environmental determination. Following is a brief description and location of the protect and staff's recommendation on the protect to be considered. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED HAVEN wY[I'/llt NC1111111Lilal lUw YxUJ [l.i - LliT Ur N11Ni,MU UILamUNlti1 - Ine yroJeCL which begins at 4th Street tenminating at Foothill Boulevard consists in general of widening the street to three (3) lanes in each direction; overlaying the existing pavement, strtptng, signet and utility relocations as necessary for street widening. STAFF RECOMENDATION It Ts recommended that City Council appprove the Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Negative Deciaratton for the proposed Haven Avenue Rehabilitation Project. A copy of the Environmental Assessment can be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Office located at the City Nall address. Nrltten comments should be addressed to the Design Engineering Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga, P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730, or phoned at 1714) 989-1862, extension 2372. In addition, concerns can be addressed to the City Council publicly at the meeting time previously mentioned. The meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. and shall take place et Ctty Nall Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. PUBLISH: June 21, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: June 5, 1991 ~// To: Y Mayor, Members of the Clly Councll and Cfty Manager '~ O:; >I FROM: RMk Gomez, Community Development Duectoz F'i U~ BY: Joe O'Neil, Clty Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Preliminary F,ngineer's Reports and setting a public hearing Cw July 3, 1991, to levy the annual essessmcnts and approve the EnglneeYS Reports (or landscape Maintenance Dlstnet Nos. 1,2,3a,3b,4,5,6,7 and 8 RECOMMENDATION: IL is recommended that Ctly Councll approve the Prcitminary Engineer's Report's and set a Publk Hearing for July 3, 3991, to levy the annual assessments and approve the E'ngneuz's Reports fo: landscape Maintenance DLVtrlets Nos. 1, 2, 3."4 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. BA Rate increases involving utlHty rnsts and contract services helped contribute to an Increase in maintenance costa for most of the dlstrJCta. Due to a severe winter, frost damage costs are formidable in some of the distnMS. Contributing to the mcieases m uWSly costs 1s an increase in water rotes Cw the districts along with slgnfilcant mereases m maintained areas. in an attempt [o control 91 /92 water costs, in addition [o subsequent years water costs, moisture sensors en being installed in some of the dlsMcts. These costs will help hold down the skyrocketing water burden. Not readtty obvious Is the mcmase m rates attributable to the decreased support from the General Fund. '.Vlth this factor considered m the cakulatton of the recommended rates Cor 91/92, a direct correlation between increased maintenance costs, the change in assessable amts, and any lnerease m rates will not exist. Service levels can play a part in keeping costs down in a Wstrkt. Utlliaing a lower, end yet more optimum, service levN, rnetF tnr x dtstrtet can be hNd down belmv a normal increase and in some cases reduce matrrtenance costs. With these and other factors becoming more evident in tkre management of the districts, cost saving landscaping methods are being reviewed and Implemented. In addition, development policies are under review in an attempt to best balance the support o(tht cost oC maintaining the landscaping by the properties within each dislrlct against the expansion of the maintained area within [he distnc[. Below Is a dlslrlet-by-district summary of the recommended rates, current sates, and some reasons for arty Increase in the rates. You should refer to each distrtct's Annual Engineer's Repoli (or additional detall. Landscape Maintenance District 1 -General CIty The recommended rate o($69.95 rellert increased utility costs (water and electrtdty) along with the replacement of weather damaged trees in addition to Bear Gulch Park befog added for maintenance. UWIty costs nrasl support the increased park area (5 acres) in addition to over 7.5 acres of more ground cover, shrubs and turf, an Increase of 93 ti5'!b over 80/x1. 'the district 18 funding 26 Capital Ilmmtenance projects throughout the City Crum prior year funds. The current assessment Is 85.00. Iandscape Maintenarce District 2 - Victoria The recommended [ate o(g76.00 reflects Increased water costs which can be partially attributable to the eddttlon of maintained areas (an increase of war 40 acres, or 5696) a;ong with increased water rates. Weather damaged landscaptng and moisture sensors are being installed et a total cost of 80,000. A prior year surplus of $93,230 will be used for this dlstnct to help hold down the 91 /92 assessment. The cutrent assessment Is $204.75. Landscape Maintenance District 3A -Hyssop rvuue ure waurrauuu wca rcmamea constant mere ra an antloipa[etl [ate increase to water costa which result m a recommended cafe of 879.38. Due to the smaD number d' parcels Involved in the district (8) any change in budgeted amounts can have a slgnIDcant effect on the fate. Total costs to the dlstrlet wID only Increase apprordmatety $800.00. $465.00 of that lrrerease fs attributable to water lnereases. The curmsrt assessment la $256,75. landscape Maintenance Dlatnet 3B - Commeanlal/Industrial Maintenance District The rernmmended rate la $248.99. A doubling of the maintained aroa from 4.5 to neally 9.0 acres and the resutttug 400961ncrease in water costs accounted for the primary Increase in costs. The current asses®ent is $175.OD. landscape Maintenance DLtrtcl S -Terra Vista The recommended rate >s $240.16. Vehicle maintenance and opemUOns (up $75,000) and water costs (up $60,000) accounted for most of Uu rnrreao' in costs. Moisture sensors ($20,000) and the replacement of weather damaged trees ($23,700) also contributed to the increase. Total maintenance costs rose nearly $225.000, or 4896. This fs reflected Crom the Increase in maintained area of Hearty 17 acres. up 8096 frmn 90/91. The current assessaent is $110.00. Landscape Maintenance DlsVle[ 5 -Tot Lot The recommended rate is $105.00. The cw'rent assessment rote o($I05.001s sulRGent to ewer costs for 91 /92. Th1s distrte[ rnnafsts of a small playground Caclflty L33 aces) supported by a single tmcl of 44 homes. This dlstrtct fa not expected to grow in siu, either try number of assessable units, nor by [nahrtainea area. Landscape Maintenance District 6 - Caryn The recoaunended rate Is $235.48. An lncrrase in water costs (up 2196) attrounled for the primary incmas:: L7 maintenance costs. This corresponds to an vncrease in the maintained area try 3 acres, up 19%. The curnnt assessment Is $195.00. ~3 ~ i.endacape Mxinteruuce Dlntriit 7 - EfiWw;da Ya u'i The recommended rate Y 8400.64. This district represents a relaWety iazge landscaped area supported by lower than average number oC pamle. This factor along with increased contract services coetn (an incrrs.9e of 6143,560) has the greatest tmpad on the recommended cote. 91 /921s the first yeaz 1n which the distnet mafntalne the landscaping. The Warren[ rate fs 875.00. landscape Malntenanee District 8 - Etlwanda South The recommended rate 1s 8145.22. Aq with district 7, 91/92 Is the first year Cor distract malnialned landscaping. Thts is a small maintenance dlstrkt serving a limned number o[ parcels (73(. Contract Services Increases (up 81,790 or 4696) had a signi9cant impact on the recommended rate. Malntenmxe and Operations avers up 8933 (11496) over 90/91. The current rate la 896.00. Respectfully aubmt ~ ~~~ ~~ RESOLUTION N0. ~ j~ ~^ If-~~y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE IMIN7ENANCE DISTRICTS NDS. 1, 2, 3A, 30, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO NHEREAS, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant w sire y,wi5i6u r `oC :..,,^,~~C'^~^~ anA I I~MNnn art of 1977, 62100 Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Description of Existing and Proposed Nork. SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it 1s the in en ono this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 through 8, inclusive, for fiscal year 1991-1992 for the maintenance and operation of (i) existing and previously approved improvements including those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said districts and (11) proposed additional improvements which Include the Bear Gulch park facilities. Said maintenance and operation shall include costs to "maintain" and "service" the improvements as those terms are defined in Sections 22531 and 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code. Said costs shall also Include the adninistration and supervision required in order to provide such maintenance and service. Location of Existing and propced improvements. SECTION 2: The existing improvements to be maintained and serviced are loco e w n the public right-of-way and landscaping easements delineated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the office of the City Clerk, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 through 8, inclusive." The proposed additional improvements are located within pu611c1y owned lands delineated in the report of the City Engineer. OescrTption of Assessment Districts. SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, sf'Tmore than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: 93 ~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. JUNE 5, 1991 PANE 2 All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 , "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A', "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of Landscape Maintenance district No. 4", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 8', Indicating Dy sold boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are on f11e in the office of the Ctty Clerk of said City. n C~X,14a vC Cnnl„ppY. SECTION 4: 'The City Council by Resolution No. ~" ~~" has approved annua report of the City Engineer which repor con ns the following: a. Plans and specifications for the maintenance and services to be provided to the existing and proposed improvements b. An estimate of the costs of providing the maintenance and service for the existing and proposed improvements c. Diagrams of the assessment districts, including any zones within any of the assessment districts d. An assessment of the estimated costs of providing the maintenance and service for the existing and proposed improvements, including the method of assessment. The report, entitled "Annual Engineer's Report", is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Reference is made to such report for a full and detailed description of the existing and proposed improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the various assessment district. Time and P1 ace of Hearing. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 3rd day of July, 1991, at a our of 7:00 PM 1n the City Council Chambers of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said maintenance and service for the existing improvements and the proposed improvements should not be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1991-1992. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify the same, and must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the time set for the hearing and no other protests or obJections will be considered. If the signer of the protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll as the owner of the property for which the protest has been filed, such protest must contain or be accaapanied by written evidence that such signer is the owner of the property so described. 93 ~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. JUNE 5, 1991 PAGE 3 Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 6: Ali work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication of Resolution of Intention, SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant Section 6961 of the Oovernmen o e. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk chall attest to the same, antl the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published lU aays oeiu~~ "c ^_~!^ cat for the hearing, at least once in the inland Yaite~yy ~_Da~~Tiy_Bulletin, a newspaper of general cirwl6:.- ^^M7lchad in EFe~T'Ey 'o'f ~)n a1-'r~ CTTfornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ~~ RESOLUTION N0. GI .. /`T~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY AvPROYAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS- 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1912, rho raw Enai nnnr ie r^;u?r=d tc ~.ka a,,,i iiie wi to the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or Improvement of said Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 3B, 4, 5, 5, 7, and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duty considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified 1n any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of *_hem are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment Districts 1n proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1991/92 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. ~d Gc'~C~ ~ ~3ar~c~~o c~c~c~o~c~ Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways and Equestrian Traila) Approved: William J. U'Ne11, City Engineer dty or Aaueho Caramom8a Aonaai FaQnecYa Repart Lndsnpe Nalatematiae Diarrkt fla 1 (General City Parkrray h F.gmeslrlam'Mlls) Pistil rear 91/x2 The FY 91 /92 annual ropon for landscape Maintenance DlstriM No. 1 (General Clty Parkways !t Equestrlan'IYaila) is prepared in compliance with the regivrements of Article 4, Chapter 1. Div)slon 5 of the Streets and Highways Code. State of Callfortua (Landscape and Lighting ACt of 19721. randsraoe Maintenance DistrlM H 1 ILMD a 1) represents 52 kmldscaped alter at various lomtlons throughout the Clty. These sites are not conamerea to tx assomatcu wail wry one particular area within the City. but rather hene0t the Cily on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within five dlstrlM do not represent a dfetklet area of the Clty as do the City's remaining LMD's. "typically parcels within thfs district have been annexed upon development of those parcels. The 52 sites maintained try the dlstnet consist of parkways, paseos, median Islands, entry monuments and equestran trolls. The breakdown of mmntalned areas is as follows: Ground Cover and Shrubs Turf Parkland Equestrian Trails Total 5{30/91 Protected SL89(S~ 11.00 i 17.73 Acres 0.56 1.35 " 0.00 5.00 " Z:'..4 7.94 " 18.56 31.06 " The ground corer and shrubs and turf areas are maintained under contract by a private maintenance company while the equestrian tra0s are malntalned by the Clt~s 1Yalls and Appllcamon Crew. Capital /mprwements vdthin LMD K1 were paid by, and rnnsWMed in cotrtunctlon with. development protects. In FY 90/91 LMD s 1 funded the retrofit of L~ndscapulg and urlgatlon in parkways at 26 venous locavons within the distrlet. Funding for these protects will continue Into FY 91/92. The matonty of the budgeted coats for LMD 711 ate Car dlteM maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functkuts, aWng with tree mafntenarxe and certain urigatlon system repair and testulg are performed through a Contrac{ Services Agreement the Clty has with a private Lvidxape mainlenance comparry. The Cfiy's Trolls and Appbcanon Crew maintains the equestrian trails. The protected costs to operate and maintain LMD pl are as follows: Proms.d Malnt nan B ~ a t: 91/92 Regular Payroll 848,880 Fringe Benefits 816,890 Malnteriancc and Opera[lona m52,299 Vehicle Mantenance and Operations $17.938 Contingency -Tree Replacement 63,500 Contract Services • Landscape Maintenance $192,000 • Tree Maintenance $15,522 • BackRow Testing 65,525 • Misc. (clec., plumbing, etc.) $2.000 Cap1[al Expenditures -Protects 90/91 Creeze/wind damage • '[Yee, shmb & ground corer $53,200 replacement • Moisture sensor and $27,000 COIltroller/mClxYnrE lnstallatlons Capital ExpenQitures - rqutpment ~vG Capital Expcndltures - Vehir]es $O Water 6122,211 Electric 18.042 Subtotal; Add: Assessment AdmWstratlon (65 / AUJ 642,815 Add: Overhead (7.5% of Revenue Required) $4261$ Total Revenue Required: l,Q Less: interest and Penalties @ Assessment Revenue Required $6.94.901 For 91 /92 the district budgeted $53.200 Cor the removal and installation of landscaping which was damaged or destroyed during the 90/91 winter and the high wends durtng that year. $27,000 was budgeted Cor the Installation of water saving moLSture sensors and the mstallatlon oC controller enclosures. Even with the moLatu: a sensors water costs for [he year are proJJectcd to tx $122.211, No vehicle or equipment purchases an; budgeted form 91/92. $104,5001s evadable from a prior year reserve Cor the prellslnary design, design and construcUOn o(the parkway retro0ts stated above N FY 90/91. In addition, 650,000 will be loaned to the dLatrict to be used toward the preliminary design of the 26 retzotlt proJeMs. The City's adminlstratNe charge to the dlstnM amounts to $5.00/All, (or a tote: of $42.815. The Cites adminidrattVe overhead equals 7.5% of the gross revenue realized for a total x(647,618. Budgeted maintenance costa (or IId7J Hl tra:reased from 6339,170 m90/91 to 6544,469 m 91 /92. Tlds increase can, m part, be attributed to an tnerease of 7.52 acres m the main?aired area o(the dlstrlM. Significant lnereases over 90/91 such as the replacement of weather damaged trees. shrubs and ground cover ($53.200), the Installation of moisture sensors (627,000( and anticipated water costs (6122.211( accounted for the maJor share of the invEesed makttenarxe costs. Added to 11viD # 1 Is the maintenance of Beaz Gulch Park for an additions coat of 685,100. Maintenance funding for this park was previousty provided (or by the General Fund. [n subsequent years maintenance funding Cor seven other pazks which are currently being funded by the General Fund wW be phased mto I.MfI M 1, Those pazks are: 1 Beryl Park -East 2 Beryl Park • West 3 Church Sheet Park 4 I1ons Park & Center 5 Old Town Park 6 Hermosa Park 7 Rancho Cucamonga Nefghborhoad Center The following ltemtzes the assessment rate for the dt~rlet: Untt x o[ Base Untt Adjusted 12n4L5s 1YCt S:Dlts 1/ snit FaSS4L B8t4 ~]^~~~ Family Parcel 8,797 469.95 1.0 469.95 Multl•Famlly ia.'~~? 4.553 0.5 94.98 Total t~evu:::~ 4475,4504 159.452 1634.922 A projected 4317,451 carryover from 90/91 will be used to tuM this dletrtct for the OrA haH of 91/92 undl assessments are received h January 82. Isndacape Malntenam Dlatrtcl No. 1 Anltvatlona for Flacal Year 1981 /92 ~~j2 TRACT YF SCOtmher 7. 1988 129 lit ~+l~a~ 7 2swu. ANNA F D TRACT . 13823 1989 I 6 6AU. ANNR]CFD rosr-r . Novetn ei tASY30 23 AU. i2 TEtACT Ja^JLa^' 3. 1990 13821 h 7 1990 M 7AU. ANA TRACT . arc 1389D-1 1900 h 7 51 AU. ANNF.XF.D TRACT . Marc 13890-2 h 2 1990 40 AU. ANN>: -xr'D TRACT ' 1. Marc 13739 1990 d 18 AU. ANN ->~ TRACT . A.~ 33898 7AU. aNN_F.:.'cB Mav 29. 3990 TRACT 13316 123 AU. -~ ~, le-SSESSWICI+i i ~.r1Gr`tilil~h ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ~ STREET LIGMTIFiG MAINTENANCE DlSTRIC7 NOS. t AND 2 • ~ J ' r .. u J ~ ~~ 1 i ! I ~ L~~ ~ I ~ , i- -I e - I . ~ w+w+~.`.' ~ , .. ..,,.. .. . L w ,a` .,. CTl? O! RANCHO CUCA1t0Ii8A ;~~~ OOUNTY 0! QAIt BERNARDINO .; ~:.. ~ STAT! 0! CATdlORNI11 ~ 7 a. ~ ~ l~f --~- ! cxeiazT "a" ~ ~.SSESSMENT DIAG~tAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 M~O~ YOYTt -~ ,~`~33."l'-.• ~"~-'~--Tr~-~J-~~'s=rte ~ ~[' ~ ~i ~~ I i , ~~ ~ _ ~ '. Y ___ s r~ _. 1. '_~ ~ y f1 • ! i I > it ^ ~ 7 ~ a ~ u '+ ~ ^r __ y i ~ -- ~ ~ I ~ ° re 11 • __*^ ~ _ '~_-, ~ - !e >' ~ i :Q , •i ~ ~ ~ f ~ h I • -._~ ~ • ' ~ i /~ YP-__ __ V /J N • a r.-rNrz~sor --- » rr --- ' G T ~ i • ,~ ,t ~^Y~' f i e a ~~~~y,, .,.. PYP~~' .ii I ar .o rr '11 ~ XI IVQ~! ~ •9r ~~ J/I;~ Jx.L ~y ~ TliYA97k' ., ij+i6F.~ ~ ~ "~6~! ~r,uTU>`~ 3iCGds~ -'1--• ~- ~~ ~,~,,^ CPP! O~ BANCBe CQCA1[OYIOA ,'~~~,~ COVM'! Ot SAlQ HEENARDIIiO y ~ BTATS O~ CALIIIORtdiA -~,-- _ N I~° AssESSMENT DIAOItAM ! LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIONTWO MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~T~ .r/y/~waw ~ o ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ .o l' " 1 1!' r~ ~ r, ~ l` \~ 1 fJ ~ + ~ 1 i-----r- -' /-" r t~ ~~ ~ ~ CITY 011 lUNCNO Ct1CAMONOw COUNTY OR lsAN I~ERNARDNIO ~ sTATE OR CALI/011NIA rR 13430 I y ,' , ~ ; AyESSMENT DIAGF3iriA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STRE$~' LI~MTtN'G MAINTENANC€ DISTRICT Nt}S, i AND 2 ~ `.. ~ .. .. . •• --~ t ALMOEIO STREET ~ , ~ 2 w t W ~ j s N > ~ W O H m ¢ --'- N ¢ W - _ _ ~ •HILI:SIDE pOAO f ~ .. _ r s ' • r: '-' ~ W' .... ~.YVII$O.Il;- AVENUE''.. ~ ~.. . ~•~ - ~ , g3 D ^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONt#A COUNTY O~ SAN BERNARDINO TR 13~~ L • STATE OF CALIEOEiNlA ~_ A~8ESSMENT DIAQRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ' STREET LIGNTNrp MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~ <f~ : `' 3 ~ M ~ M al ~ W 7L .~ 17 ai U -. (~ ~ ~ .. 7 ~ M L ~ N M t7 s ~Zj p ~ ` ~ ~ n R t+ ~~ ~ 4 M N ~ ~O M as A AAARS[LLA OR. ~s u w n w n so ti u r MIGNLAND ,AVC. CITY OR IIAArCIIp CtlCAMONpA _ C01NrTY O!r !AN SERNARDINO ><T~ OR CALIRORIHA ~ 13~9o-I ~3 Q .SESSONENT QIA~R..M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STR€€7 LIGFITING NiAltdTEp1ANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 S i ff ~ ~r. ~ sti .r~ re ~. ~~ v u - os i/ R^l: ! ~ . ',,.I _ _~ ~ I _ / p .. ~ ,. tom, 7 ~ ~ tt1 q~ I re • ~w ~y ~ • ~ ~i ~,\ ~~, • n. ~, t _n -~. -.:~.. l'~,~.. .~.. ~~ ~-i CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA ,~ ~ ~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA X33/6 exHblT •a• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FiO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 -i I e.r n /i. ,~ ~'~\yQS~+4 ~/I/~d1'~t'7a'w ~0.0o I ry ~° I ~ J N 00'LI X04 E Z94.pL tom. rN ,~ iii C~ ~ i I I ~. N W ~x.oo~ ~0 I f~rctL I ~ LC6AL tt~.so~ OIAGRI IoN~~ ~- -- - r - I ,~ ,pc,wO,~n siTiv~ ~ , ~ I ,, ~ , ~ I je I j~ I ~r. I jo I x l ss 15r, ~I I I -,( I I I i ~ r------~ ~\ ~ I PRC~POS S~BONYS/v^.1~ I I I L1 1) ~~ TRAC~M01/l3MI I I I~~------/ -1_L_ L-L-L-L-J ~I ~ I-----~ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMON~A ~' COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 133/(0 Al~3ESSMENT DIAGRAli1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t STREET LitiHTiNp MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 2 • a " v v ~. a ~4 u a,a QR, n ~ N a A ~ s as is a ~ as ~ ~ a = s a0 :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ss u 9.3 s crrr o~ ~eA~o cuc~w~oNO~ cou~TY o~ s~ ~A~D~o STATE OR CAL~ORNIA /389o a E7IM1lIT •~• .~~SESSMENT DIAGR'n`M LANDSCAPE SAAMJTENANCE i~iSTRIGT NO. i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 rte-' ~L ~ :r~~~~i;~~ai 3 CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMOI~ItiA ~' _ COUNTY OR d..-+ N dERNARDINO ~ STATE O~ CALIRORNIA 13738 v . EJ(NNl1T 'A• . ASSESSMENT DIARiRAM LANDSCAPE WIAIFiT&NANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIOHTMIO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 LE N O[NOT[9 l/MO[C~P[ /NL/ ~ O[NO Ttf [IB[M•LN O[MOT[[ [TN[[T LION7 O[NOTt[ fN[l[ •LI/L/T1 1T -~ T ~I / II Y ii~l`'i'1`` i ~ Y 7 l MI•li LYa LT n i n [ 0 0 I i [ 0 J I lLw/N e+rn[sa cr. CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONaA COUNTY OR fAN SERNARWNO TIP 13899 CALNIORNIA _I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Orcrgirr MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS THE SERVICE LEVEL fOR TURF MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall mow ail turf areas once per week during the period of March 1 to November t; and not less than blweekiy during the period of November 2 to February 28. 2. The Contractor shall edge all turf grass borders concurrently with each mowing. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all turf areas 1n accordance with Schedule II-A. 4. The Contractor shall mechanically aerate all turf areas both 1n the spring and the fall of each year and more often as required t0 reduce compaction and stress. 5. The Contractor shall mechanically dethateh all turf areas once per year. This operation should be scheduled immediately prior to over seeding for those areas that are to be over seeded. 6. The Contractor shah on an annual basis over seed all areas that do not have a high quality stand of turf. 7. Concurrently with each mowing, the Contractor shall mechanically "bowl" around all irrigation heads that are blocked by grass between mowtngs. 8. The Contractor shall on a weekly basis remove any trash or debris that accumulates on the turf. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR PEST CONTROL IS: Complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all plant pests and weeds. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR GROUND COYER MAINTENANCE IS: I. The Contractor shall on a blmonthiy basis trim all ground cover ad,acent to any hardscape, structure, fixture, plant or other area into which it should not encroach. 2. The Contractor shall on a biweekly schedule clean aqy accumulated debris or trash fray all ground cover areas. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all ground cover areas every 18D days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. 4. The Contractor sF.all at t.".a direction bf lire City Engineer, mow, or otherwise lower, to a height of three Inches all overgrown ground cover that 1s a fire hazard. 5. The Contractor shall mechanically or chemically "bowl" as often as is required around each irrigation head that is blocked by ground cover. THE SERVICE LEYEL FOR SHRUB MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall prune with shears in March and September all shrubs, such that each shrub grows without encroaching upon any adjacent improved area, street or sidewalk, or otherwise becomes a puDilc hazard. ~ rtia r.,..r:ctc; - - ;a,l;;i« aii suruos every 18D days ustng 6-6-6 with trace elements orsapproved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR YINE MAINTENANCE IS: I. The Contractor shall trim vines once per year 1n September. 2. The Contractor shall re-attach to a wall or fence once per year in September vines that fall off the well by using the attachments required on the construction pions for the site. 3. The Contractor shall annually, 1n September, remove all vines that grow into undesirable places such as trees or shrubs. 4. The Contractor shall fertilize ail vines every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TREE MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall trim to a height of fifteen feet above grade, trees on the work sites to maintain them 1n a safe condition including vehicie, pedestrian and equuestrian clearance and free of dead, diseased and dying wood and "Rangers or other public hazards. Any hazard above that height wail be reported to the City Engineer. 2. The Contractor shad "tip-back' young trees whenever they encroach upon adjacent vehicular, pedestrian or equestrian traffic. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize each tree on each work site once per year with the appropriate number of Agrifona 21 Gram Plant Tablets, or approved equal, per size of tree. 4. The Contractor shall restake any tree needing rcstaking. C~C~!Jc~}f' ~°3aac~i~o C~~a~~r~~a Annual Engiaeer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Plaaned Community) Approved: Wllllam J. O'Neil, City Engineer city of ll~acho Cttcamon)(a AtmtW PSa~nee>'a Report Ta,>NCape titvintdunoe DLtrlot No. 2 (Nctorla PLnned Cammttttifyi Fbc~l Year 91/92 The FY 91/92 annual report Cor Landscape Maintenance Dlstrtct No. 2 (Vlctorte Planned Commumty) Is prepazed N compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Strec[s and Highways Code, State of Cahfonda (Landscape and Lighting Act of 19721. "'"n1al:apC ManllCllanlt LLYIr#:l NL IuviL Ntj .epl COellin ia1.YM:CpcY mica iiuuu~i.uui the Victoria Planned Community. These site are aesaclated with areas within that community and as such any benefit delved from the landscape Installation can be directly attributed to those petrels within that coromumty. Because of this. assessments required [or title district are charged to those parcels within that planned commumty. The sites tnafntalned by the dlstrtct consist of pazkwgys, paseos, median Islands, equestrian Valle and parks. The breakdown of malntalned areas 1s as follows: Ground Cover and Shrubs Turf Parkland Equestrian Trails Total 9L ;~L !` Protected L~4L92 f . ~ 1 21.00 i 45.28 Acres 22.00 38.53 „ 27.50 27.50 x.44 ~ ., 73.50 114.31 The ground cover and shrubs and turf areas are mamtafned under contract with the equestrian trails and pazks being mamtalned by the Clly's Trails and Appllcatlon Crew. Capual unprovements wlthm I.MD tl2 were paid by, and constructed m mnJunctton with, development by the VSCtona Planned Community. The matonty of the budgeted costs for LMD k2 are for olrect mamtenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain urlgatlon system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Appllcatlon Crew wlll be matn!aunng the equestrian trolls. The proJecled costs to operate and maintain LMD H2 aze as follows: Proposed Maintenance Butieet 91/92 Regular Payroll $252,700 Fringe Benefits $84.230 Maintenance and Opemtlons $19,700 Vehicle Maintenance and Opetattons $99,260 Contingency -Tree Replacement $O Canvac[ Servces • Landscape Maintenance $575,000 • ltee Malnterlance $O • Backtlow Testing $0 • Mlle. (elec.. Plumbing. etc.) $O Capital Expenditures -Protects 90/91 treeae/wind damage • Trce, shrub & ground corer $59,585 replacement • Moisture sensor and $20,000 controller/enclosure lnstallatfons Capital Expenditures -Equipment $O Capital Expenditures -Vehicles $0 Water 7Rdl.a 'atfi Electric $26,833 Subtotal: 1, 1 Add: Assessment Administration )ffi5 / A.U.) $19,170 Add: Overhead (7.596 of Revenua Required) ~ $127,286 Total Revenue Required: 1, .1 PrlorYgrSmpWs !93.240 Nd Reivawe Requae,$~ Less: Interest and Penalties $x.491 Assessmeut Revenue Required $1.522,371 No vehicle or equipment pun:hases are budgeted for to 91 /92. This wtU hold total costs for the district down to 91 /92. SlgniBcant cost Items lncludc Contract Services of $575,000 and protected water usage of $413.386, both otwhkh can be attrlbrrted to an increase >n the maintained area d the dfatrid of war 40 acres, Iron 73.50 in 90/91 to a proJeMed 114.31 acres in 91(42. The City's adrninistratlve charge for the assessment and collection of that assessment amounts to $5.00/AU. for a total of $19,170. The City's administrative warhead amounts to 7.596 of the grass revenue realaed for a tolai of $120,833. m FY 90/91, Lhe Assessment Rase for LMD q2 was $204.75/AU. The increase to $376.00/AU. 1s attributable to Increased water costs of $283,386 due to an lnerease in the maintained area of 40.81 acres along with protected Increases 1n wafer rates. Fr 91/82Aawrment Rate .. Below >s the schedule IleUng the assessment rate fw the types of land uae. Those A.U. wlll be assessed at a vase rate of $375.00/A.U. for the dfaUlct to 1l8112e revenue for FY 91/92 of ®1,522,371. A smplua of !883,240 due to pdw year's revenues escadtng actual expenses Mll be passed onto 91/921n order to reduce assesvments Cor the yeaz. Unit 8 of Base Untt Adjusted iAd1dS75C 1~II SILItB 6/Unit Factor BSLC B4Yt0YG Single Family Parcel 3,897 $376.00 1.0 ®376.00 X1,485,272 Commercial Acre 15.74 2.0 752.00 11,898 Vacant Acre 481.52 0.25 94.00 r Total Revenue 61.522.371 A amleMed 6761.188 rnmn,ver (mm on (al ann lv Hurl ~.. ~ ,nA I~.la .i,NNM (_~ ~r.n NM! half of 91/92 until asaessraents are received in January 92. l.aiulscape Malntenatdce DL~trlot No. 2 Mnacatlone for Fl9t:a1 Year 1981/92 P M 12263 26.82 AU. '~, - ~~ c+uM01T 'A' ~ .. ASSESSMENT DIA4IRAM STREET LIGNTWG MAINTENANCE DISTRfCT NOS. 1 AND 3 i ..~.~ i ~a. Iv~T~-ems i -.___ _~_ F -{. i_ II ~e a :~ ~._+, i_' i ~ .. 1.?.'... ti~ _~ ns~=r ~~..~-.- `. r.... aryV:pq... 9~~ ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CtICAMONQA _ COUI~ITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~"~ ..- .....+.Y .-, .... ., ,, i~usin LANDSCAPE iMINTENANCE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE SPFC1cTCA'rtONS THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TURF IMINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall mow all turf areas once per week during the period of March 1 to November 1; and not less than biweekly durin~~ the period of November 2 to February 28. 2. The Contractor shall edge all turf grass borders concurrently with each mowing. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all turf areas in accordance with Schedule II-A. :. The i.oncractor snail mechanically aerate ell turf areas both in the spring and the fall of each year and more often as rcqulrcd to reduce compaction and stress. 5. The Contractor shall mechanically dethatch all turf areas once per year. This operation should be scheduled immediately prior to over seeding for those areas that are to be over seeded. 6. The Contractor shall on an annual basis over seed all areas that do not have a high quality stand of turf. 7. Concurrently with each mowing, the Contractor shall mechanically "bowl" aroucd all irrigation heads that arc blacked by grass between mowings. 8. The Contractor shall on a weekly basis remove any trasA or debris that accumulates on the turf. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR PEST CONTROL IS: Complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all plant pests and weeds. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR GROUND COVER MAINTENANCE 1S: 1. The Contractor shall on a bimonthly basis trim ail ground cover ad,lacent to any hardscape, structure, fixture, plant or other area Into which tt should not encroach. 2. The Contractor shall on a biweekly schedule clean any accumulate0 debris or trash from all ground cover areas. 3. The Contractor shali fertilize all ground cover areas every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. 4. The Contractor shall at the direction of the City Engineer, mow, or otherwise lower, to a height of three inches all overgrown ground raver that is a fire hazard. 5. The Contractor shall mechanically or chemicaity "bowl" as often as is required around each irrigation head that is blocked by ground cover. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR SHRUB IMINTENANCE I5: 1. The Contractor shall prune with shears in March and September all shrubs, such that each shrub grows without encroaching upon any adJacent improved area, street or sidewalk, or otherwise becomes a public hazard. -. r~- -- - -- ~4_tl s-...n,_ .11 _A.. A_ - tall A_. _ elww G__[_r. ui~M trace-elements or approved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR VINE IMINTEtNNCE IS: 1. The Contractor shell trim vines once qer year in September. 2. The Contractor shall rc-attach to a wall or fence once per year in September vines that fall off the wall by using the ettachaents required on the construction plans for the site. 3. The Contractor shall annually, 1n September, remove all vines that grow into undesirable plates such as trees or shrubs. 4. The Contractor shall fertilize all vines every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TREE M1IINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall trim to a height of fifteen feet above grade, trees on the work sites to maintain them 1n a safe condition including vehicle, pedestrian and equestrian clearance and free of dead, diseaud and Qy1ng wood and "hangers" or other pu611c hazards. Any hazard above that height will be reported to the City Engineer. 2. The Contractor shall 'tip-back" young trees whenever they encroach upon adJacent vehicular, pedestrian or equestrian traffic. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize each tree on each work site once per year with the appropriate number of Agrifore 21 Gram Plant Tablets, or approved equal, per size of tree. 4. The Contractor shall rcstake any tree needing rcstaking. ~~ c .; ~3c~c~~o C~ac~c~o~~c~ Annual Engiaeer's Report Landscape Maiatenaace District No. 3a (Hyssop ~fiaiatenance District) Apnr,.ed: William J. O'Nell, City Engineer dry o! Rancho (ltxmonja Anneal ~e++r'a Report Ladacape 1Nalntenance D6trlet Ro. 3a (RY~P Malaterunce D1atrlet) Pbcal Year 91/92 The FY 91 /92 annual report Cor [.andscape Maintenance Dlstrkt No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance Districts B prepared 1n compbarice with the requirements d Article 4, Chapter 1, 'JivLSion 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State d Cah(omia (Landscape and Lighting Act d 19721. r9nAanaN M91n1anoniu T\MNM YV~ I\ •In Yn~\ ~~~~~_ _ ~~~~rv~ ~~s~a) W Hyssop DrWe south o(Shdh Street. Thla e2le b aaeodeled with an er'a wlthkr that • district and as such arty bene(!t derived from the ffiMeraPe W Wlatton cen be d[rectty altr(buted to those parcels within that distncL Because duds. aeeemments required for this district aze red to those parcels within that district. The breakdown d mamtamed areas fs as oliows: 8/30/91 Pro cried Ground Cover and Shrubs Q,jg Q,14 Acres Total 0.14 0.14 " The Cround cover and shrubs are rruuntalned under contntet Capital lmprwementa a7thln LMD N3a were paid, by and construMed fn mn)unctlon with, development by the Hyssop Maintenance District. >~i The maJortty d the budgeted costs Cor LMD N3a are for direct maintenance d ground ewer and shrubs. These futrtions are provided thorough a Contract Servkp Agreement the City has with a private landscape mamtenantt company. The protected rmsts to operate and mamfam Lh1D pia ace as Foikws: PIODOad Ma nt a R. d }• 91/~ Regular Payroll •40 Frirrge Benefits $10 Maintenance and Operations $199 Vehick Maintenance and Operattorre >s13 Contingency - Tnx Replacement m0 Contract Servkes • Landscape Mainlenance A1,510 • Tree Maintenance ~0 • Baclctlow Testing 8165 • Misc. (elec.. plumbing, ek.) A62 Capital F]cpenditures - Proftcts 90/91 [reeu/wind damage • 11'ee, shrub & ground corer >BO replacement • Moisture sensor and >Bp controller/enclosure inatallatlons Capital Expenditures -Equipment 80 Capital Expmdlturea - Vehicles 80 Watu 8800 Electric $105 Subtotal: ~'F,~ Add: o=ate nt ArhnlNstraUon (S6 / AUJ 840 Add: Overhead (7.596 of Revenue Required) b228 Totat Revenue Required I.ese: Interest and Penalties J<ygZ Assessment Revenue Required 83.035 No vehicle or equipment Purchasm are budgeted [or m 91/92. 11ris. along the deferral to later years of the fnstellatlon o[ mo(ature aensoro will hold total coats for the dlatrMt down fn 91 /92. Slgridlcard cwt Items include Contract Services of 11,510 end groJeoted water usage 48800. The City's administmttve charge Cor the aeaemment and collection of that assessment amounts to 85.00/AU. [or a total of 840. The City's adminlstrathro Overhead amaunta to 7.5% o[ the gross revenue rea]lzed for a total of 8228. In FY 90/91, the Aseesemmt Rate Coz IMD N9a was 8258.75/AU. ltie lricreax to 8a79.38/AU. fa attributable to aicreased water costa of 84&5 over 90/91 costs. TtLLa due anticipated rate increases In the cost of water. The malntalned acreage is expected to rcmaln at .14 acres therefor prgccted 91/92 costa for ContraM Services will only Increase shghtly over those of the previous year. The 1'oaowing ltemlua the assessment rate for the district: Unit M of Base Unit AdJuated laOdSlSt 1YSa Units 8/Unit Factor Biit4 13ssRUs Single Family Parcel 8 8379.38 I.O 8379,38 83.03`.1 Total Revenue 83.035 A pro)ected 81.516 carryover tram 90/91 wW be used to fund this district for the Orst half of 91 /92 until acyo,~n-ants arc received In January 92. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TURF MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall axs+ all turf areas once per week during the period of March 1 to November 1; and not Tess than biweekly during the period of November 2 to February 28. 2. The Contractor shall edge all turf grass borders concurrently with each mewing. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all turf areas in accordance with Schedule II-A. q. ine Contractor shall mechanically aerate alt turf areas both in Lhe spring and the fall of each year and sore often as roqulred t0 reduce compaction and stress. 5. The Contractor shall mechanically dethatch all turf areas once per year. This operation should be scheduled laeaedlately prior to over seeding for those areas that are to be over seeded. 6. The Contractor shall on an annual basis over Seed all areas that do not have a Aigh quality stand of turf. 7. Concurrently with each mowing, the Contractor shall mechanically "bowl" around all irrlgatton heads that are blocked by grass between mowings. 8. The Contractor shall on a weekly basis remove any trash or debris that accumulates on the turf. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR PEST CONTROL IS: Complete and contlnuaus control and/or eradication of all plant pests and weeds. THE SERYICE LEVEL FOR GROUND COVER iMINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall on a bimonthly basis trim all ground cover adiacent to any hardscape, structure, fixture, plant or other area Into which 1t should net encroach. Z. The Contractor shall on a biweekly schedule clean arty accumulated debris or trash free a17 ground cover areas. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all ground cover areas every 1811 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. 4. The Contractor shall at the direction of the City Engineer, aww, or otherwise lower, to s height of three inches all overgrown ground cover that 1s afire hazard. 5. The Contractor shall methanlcally or ~rrem1ca11y "boNl" as often as 1s required around each irrigation head that is blocked by ground cover. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR SNRBB ANINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shell prune with shears in March and September all shrubs, such that each shrub grays without encroaching upon any adiacent improved area, Street or sidewalk, or otherwise becomes a public haxard. 2. The Contractor shall fertilize alt shrubs every 180 days u<1nn g_p_c W+_. tr•tC M;.~t; yr apyrureu equal. THE SERYICE LEVEL FOR VINE MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall trim vines once per year in September. 2. The Contractor shaii re-attach to a wall or fence once per year 1n Septeaber vines that fall off the wall by using the attachments required an the construction plans for the site. 3. The Contractor shall annually, 1n September, reagve alt vines Lhat grow into undesirable places such as trees or shrubs. 4. The Contractor shall fertilize all vines every 180 days with 6-6-8 or approved equai. THE SERVICE LEYEL FOR TREE MAINTENANCE I5: 1. The Contractor shall trim to a height of fifteen feet above grade, trees an the work sites to maintain them 1n a safe condition including vehicle, pedestrian and equestrian clearance and free of dead, diseased and dying wood and "hangers" or other public hazards. Any hazard above that height will be reported to the City Engineer. 2. The Contractor shall "tip-back" young trees whenever they encroach upon adiacent vehicular, pedestrian or equestrian traffic. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize each tree on each work site once per year with the appropriate number of Agrifona 21 Gram Plant Tablets, or approved equal, per size of tree. 4. The Contractor shall restake any tree needing restaking. ~~ ~ f ~3c~~~o C~c~a~o~sc7~ Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commerciai/Indnstrlal Maintenance Dbtrlet) ]!'fecal Year 91 /92 Approved: Wll118m J. O'Nell, C1ty Engineer City of Rancho Cacamonsa Landap 1Wate DLMet 110.9b (Commercal/ladoatrW Ifalntenanee DLLr1cU lrfaoal Year 91/97 The FY 91/92 annual report for landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industnal Maintenance Diatrtct Is prepared In compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chap[er 1, DtvLSlon 5 of the Streets and Highways Cade. State of Callfomfa (Landscape and Ltghtmg Act oC 19721. BICtQt4RRO: T ~-''~-=per `:~ ::+.W.:.:. :ioui~,i w:•ir 1uru~ wuul reprCaemD imaacapea anew throughOUt the Commercial/industrial Maintenance DlatrteL 7Leee site are aasoclated with areas within that district and es such arq~ benefit derived from the lazidxape atataliatlon can be dtrectly attributed to those parcels wlihfn the district. BMallae of this, asaessmenta requtred for flits district arc charged to thox paMla within that phmned comm~udty. This district consists of the Haven Median Island and the 4th Stmt and Haven Avenue entry monument. 'Ihe M1ll0¢n Medians and entry monument ors to bt iacluded within the dlstclct m 91/92. The quantities of maintained areas consist af: Protected Ground Cover and Shrubs X0,27 ~4L,4~2 Acres Turf ~~ 3~ ~. Total 4~7 889 " The ground rnver and shrubs aze ron~n~ained under contract m rnnJmcflon with a Contract services Agreement. Capital lmpravcments wlthm LMD N36 were paid by development Beautl0catlon Fees. The maJority of the budgeted costa for LMD NSb are for dtrect maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions are provided through a Contract Services Agmment the Clty has with a private landscape maintenance campaery. The protected costs to operate and maintain LMD Nab an as follows: Pronos«! Maintena*~.~e B ~dp.t~ 91/92 Regular Payroll $2,~0 FYinge 6ene0ts ~gq0 Maintenance and Operations >9S0,7gg Vehicle Maintenance and Dperatlona !01,031 Contingency - 1Yee Replacement ~ Contract Services • landscapt Maintenance $193.700 • 7Yee Maintenance '16.000 • BackOow Testing !1,100 • Mfac. (elec.. Plumbing, stet !62,000 Caplt=' ~tptodttuns -Projects 90/x1 freeze/wind damage • Tree, shtvb & ground ewer $12,525 replacement • Moisture sensor and 516,000 controller/enclosure Installations Capttal Expenditures -Equipment 80 Capital Expenditures • Vehicles 80 Water 857,427 Electric 84,050 Subtotal: 7 1 Add: Assessment Admitdstration (i5 / A.U.1 81,940 Add: Overhead 17.5%of Revenue Required) 821.Frw Total Revenue Required ~901.6BZ Less: interest and Penalties 512.974 Assessment Revenue Required 8288.614 Weather damaged trees, ahmbs and grouts corer w18 he neplattd at a cast of 112,525. Moisture sensors wlll be installed at a rnat of 816,000. This la ezpected to decrease water usage. 'Ihe budgeted amount for water is 857,427.. No vehtclt or cqutpment purchases are budgeted far N 91/92. The City's adminlstrettve charge for the eaxsement and rn8ectlon of that aaxavnent amounts to 85.00/AU. for a total of 81,940. The City's admi..in`'+attve Overhead amounts to 7.5% of the gross revenue realbed for a total of 821,646. In FY 90/91, the Assessment Rate for IMD #3b was $175.00/AU. 'Ihe increase to $248.99/AU. Is attributable to Increased water costs of $43,427 which Is due to, not only the mcnase m the maintained area, but also an antktpated rate Increase for water. The fodawmg Itemlus the assessment rate for the dlstrlcL• Unit # of Base Unlt AdJusted land 3150 7ypS 1111113 8L3lIIIL Factor BBIC $svSilldS Single Fam11y Acres 1,159.14 8248.99 1.0 8248.99 5288.614 Tatal Revenue 5288.614 A pnJeMed 8144,307 carryover from 90/91 well be used to fund 4his dlstrkt for the first half of 91 /92 untU -°°~^ enf9 are received m January 82. I.andxape Matntena»ce Dletrlct No, 3B AnnexaUOna Cw Flgcai Year 91/92 ANNExFD DR NFrcr.`D February 7. 1990 88-19 mh 21 1990 M 12.08 All. ~ P M NEXED a . 1'1898 1990 o 4 13.32 AU. AN TRACT gyr . 11428 76 AU. 61111~~ CUP N xF (jWL 4. 1bM1 88-98 1118 ~Ofa1 A 17 AU. . AN .D PM n1 11410 A 18 1990 22.2 AU. ANNEXED CUP . ~ 88.37 IB 1990 r .7 AU. jl CUP NR`xF` ._ yy~ 8317 t l 5 1990 5 4.84 AU. AN D cuP tIIl fef . el) se-96 5 b 1990 S 7AU. ANNEXED PM NF` XF . eMem er 12781 J 19QA h 5 19.14AU. AN . .D PM .vr e!m wr . 12596 19.04 AU, A~II.VEXE[2 .~.°.1~ CUP 88-18 Nwm~ber7 1990 2.48 AU. gj2 P M . 13125 (CoMoe) h 7 N 1990 19.2 AU. jj P M orvem er . 11940 Dyer 19. 1990 5.92 AU. PM 32338 27.58AU. Iandacape Mamtenanee'DletrlCt No. 36 Annexattone for FLscal Year 91/92 ANNFYED DR FYRT AN February 7. 1990 88.19 h 21 1990 M 12.08 AU. N PM XE am . 1284& 14 1990 13.32 AU. ANNE D TRACT . ®az1 11428 : na: 76 AU. CUP YEM1 ANNF . iya: 88.38 An 118 1994 17 AU, . PM XE rj . 11410 18 1990 22.2 AU. D ANNE CUP * ~L . 88-37 h 1990 18 .7 AU. ~ ~p CUP .!y . . 89-17 t b 5 1990 S 4.84 AU. ~~ CUP em cr . en 88-06 S 5 t b 1990 7AU. ANNEXED PM en . tnl er 1'1781 CGM'mMn 5 1990 19.14 AU. Lj P M AN F XF D . 12588 9Nfer 3 O 1990 19.04 AU. . . N CUP t . 88-18 b 7 1990 N 2.48 AU. p PM ovem er . 13125 ICondoel b 7 990 19.2 AU. ~~j2 P M 8 Nwvn er . 1 11940 lX~lber 19. 1990 5.92 AU. PM 12338 27.58AU. ~.,yyc:~,~,l..~t. ~ r,.r_..... STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. "~ ti~~- ~~ s~TE /Y~1 ry/~ War M„ ~. 6 ~ I era i I d N :i ~, wt• .. x CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA I • COI,INTY OF SAN BERNARDIN0~2I ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA / ~ ~ 9~ zIs .Ib5ES5MENT D~4GF,w~iih LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LICiN7M~0 MANTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 -. .~.. ,. -~ ww "I ..... .. .......... ....... ..... .r~ s,. ....:..... S ~~ n ~ l~~ ~ tJISON COURT ~ `~ ` '•i ,~~ ~ r 1~'j _~ ~ ~~~ ELL CURT .__ ~ ..... .,.,. , . ._: .~r i «.. •i .r. i 61TY Of RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY Ole SAN BERNARDINO " PIN 12848 STATE OE CALIl~ORNIA _ ~~ ~~ Z ~ ~ ' ~ E%FYEIT •~• ASSESSMENT DIARiRAM - ~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTgICT WO. 3 ' STREB'f+ LiC#iTNiGi MRiNTENANCE DI9TRIGT N08. 1 AND 4 ~+irC CITY OIL RANCHO Ct{CAMONI3A COUNTY OII SAN 9ERNARDINO STAT~Of CALIFORNIA ~~ I ~3 Zl7 exwuT •~• AssEasMENT p1A0RAM LAlOSCAPE ORAWTENANCE D~TRIGT Nt-_ ~ STREET LIONTNlA MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N08. 1 AND 6 V/!TI ~.r OVI lTRIIT 1 =-~--~ ~ , ~ta.r+c ~~ MN wWY ifA{T Li~YT o-d ~r waan frucT ufYT W .+,.,1 Q ital. Tm u .uTaD ~uw j ~.Y t O QO lT Rat a1T~ Ttlal TYIa[~ ~ V~eTt 4aM tgaaaT. 'laTeflf fsal~tW+f h / ` ~ ,, 4fHM 1VaM1a L~tIMKY yte4elAylf~• .~ M~.IafT~t eatuTT O Z W n 2 ~ Z ~g CITY OR RANCHO C~ICAMONOA COfafNTY OR sAN tlRNARDNIO ~- P.uO trs- STATE OR CALIFORNIA /d~SESSMENT DIA~iR/l'`III LANDSCAPE MAWTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIONTMKi MAMlTENANCE DISTRICT NOS• 1 AND 8 .:+ ~J 7 L U O G .~ .~ 0 z ~ ~ CITY O~ RANCNO CUCAMONQA COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDIN pM' ~ f p STATE OF CALIFORNIA /I~SESSMENT DIA©R~-M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MANTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 W 2 "~'~ ~~ ~~y. ~~ i yqP ~, W MfLLEA AVENUE ~i3 zap CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONt#A COUNTY O~ SAN BERNARDINO ` ~ -- STATE OR CALIFORNI I 3 ..~f1 _. __~ EXHIBIT •p• SSMENT DIAGRwM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Nd. 3 . STREET lK9FITMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 Z'S OD i ~z ..• I W ~~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ h - I o ~~ ~ ' V = A I r ^~ I W .. 'a ..• e ~ ~~ I.r::_ •` ~, ~? «~ 1l~fr _ ~ i 1 Cww..~.Iw New/ ~ °"" `°"~ "'`"" I 19tn STREET I ~ Z ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONi~AA CIDUNTY OF 3AN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~llP 89-/7 ! ~ .3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE AIlAMlTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIfiNTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 I . 'Original Poor duality _ /'~ _-BA-S~EL~I N_E AVE. _ _ nur rm<x.fs}_ t_xlJrixo_c_fa_ _ ' _~ ___ V cv(r. fiocrux ` _- _ ~~j T~1 ,t((( I 1,', '~ 1~~ ifYlfr. Y.t \``II \ i I~ j~l i Q IJr. ua it i I I ' 2 I I $ ~ e ,r PARCcL i ; I P4RCEL II• l• ~ I I 8~^ ; ~ , v III` 7 1 }I. 4+ I ~,8 I ~ i i I i , A I it ~ b PARCEL j ~ i , ~YIAP 6395 ~ ~I• J t PM.o^. F121 iII i PG,~. 34 3 35 .° n'r r I~i I ° I i ~ p~ I I ~hqr. ill(6J~ I I I /Olfr, r/((f ii;l rn•ar a•c eus° ~ ~~ z ~~- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO n ; STATE OF CAiJIRORNIA `~~'P a~-Ys~ U "~ ~ - iXXIBI~ 'o• ~SESSMENT DIAGH*AM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 $TfiEEY LKiMTiNG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND g 0 z . ,,~ ~..~ r 1. ~ •'l -' i ,Or,g`ryat pooC ~Uaibl. 0 m _.._ ~~,L •,ve Y•an''•4:a lR -- CI ~'~ yr o:n ~wF~ rya':' .. ~, _. ~' ~. --•-•--- - ~T'. - 1 s , . r ~, ~. ~ ..M1W l...~ ,... ' ~ 4 ~ r .w M'e s v rli nswt i'ytl 9~/fi! a z ~_3 .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONt3A COUNTY OF SAN BERNARpINO /~ 781 STATE OF CALIFORNIA cAMlbi; '.. ASSESSMENT DIAG~-M LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LiGiiTlNia MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND g .~` ~Tf J ~Li ~ o Q.. f0 C .~ {Q; L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO n ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~M ~~59G U EJ{HIBIT •p' AsSESSMENT DIARiRAM LANDSCAPE MAWTENANCE DISTRlGT NO. 3 STREET LIGNTNiG MAMiTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 r~,~ m ~,.,~ '°o ~i `m ~~ i ao ~~ t~ • ,,:.. Z /~ 4 4v1~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (~UP138-/E3 SATE OF CALIFORNIA exws~r •~• ASSESSMENT DIAEiiiAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LKiNTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 z ~6 CITY OF RANCHO C~tICAINONOA COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDINO STATE OR CALIFORNIA 'oM /3/~5 QYIYNT •A• ~-~- ~ssss~sNT ®iAtaRar~ LAlDBCAPE MIAMITENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LKiMTNG MAMlTENANCE DISTRICT N08. 1 J l J ~. a; AND 6 CITY Ole RANCew :ISM`-4MONOA _ COUNTY Ote SAN 6ERNARDINO " PM 11940 i STATE O~ CAL~ORNIA h-/n 'A' A'LSESSMENT OIA~iRANI LANDSCAPE MAMITENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTWB IriA(NTENANCE DISTRICY NOS. 1 AND 8 Z. ~~ C!*Y OF RANCHO CUCAMON~iA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ au~ca rua tz33e ~~ STAT~~ F CALIFORNIA LANOSCAFE WIINTENANCE OISTRrr_.T MAINTENANCE SPELIFICATiONS THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TURF MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall mow all turf areas once per week during the period of March 1 to November 1; and not less than biweekly during the period of November 2 to February 28. 2. The Contractor shall edge all turf grass borders concurrently with each mowing. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all Lurf areas 1n accordance with Schedule 1i-A. 4. She Contractor shall mechanically aerate all turf areas both in the spring and the fall of each year and rare often as required to reduce compaction and stress. 5. The Contractor shall mechanically dethatch ail turf areas once per year. This operation should be scheduled immediately prior W over seeding for those areas that are to be over seeded. 6. The Contractor shall on an annual basis over seed all areas that do not have a high quality stand of turf. 7. Concurrently with each mowing, the Contractor shall mechanically "bowl" around all irrigation heads that are biocked by grass between mowings. 8. The Contractor shall on a weekly bests remove any trash or debris that accumulates on the turf. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR PEST CONTROL IS: Coarylete and continuous control and/or eradication of all plant pests and weeds. TNT SERVICE LEVEL FOR GROUND COVER MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contrac*.^-- shall on a bimonthly basis trim all ground cover adjacent != ~q nardscape, structure, fixture, plant or oiher area into which it should not encroach. 2. The Contractor shall on a biweekly schedule clean any accumulated debris or trash from all ground cover areas. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all ground cover areas every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. A. The CantracP,ir shall at the direction of the City Engineer, mow, or otherwise tower, to a height of three inches all overgrown ground cover that is afire hazard. 5. The Contractor aha11 mechanically or chemically "bowl" as often as is required around each irrigation head that is blocked by ground cover. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR SHRUB IAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shalt prune with shears in March and September all shrubs, such that each shrub grows without encroaching upon any adjacent improved area, street or sidewalk, or otherwise becomes a public hazard. _ ~,~ii,<e aii snruos every 180 days using 6-6-6 with trace elements or approved equai. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR YIME MAINTENANCE SS: 1. The Contractor shall trim vines once per year to September. 2. The Contractor shall re-attach to a wall or fence once per year in Septea~ber vines that fall off the wall Dy using the attachments required on the construction plans for the site. 3. the Contractor Shall annually, in September, remove all vines that grow into undesirable places such as trees or shrubs. 4. The Contractor shall fert111ze all vines every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TREE MAINTENANCE I5: 1. The Gontractar shall trim to a height of fifteen fret above grade, trees an the work sites to maintain them 1n a safe conditlon including vehicle, pedestrian and equestrian clearance and free of dead, diseased and Qying wood and "hangers" or other public hazards. Any hazard above that height wilt be reported to the City Engineer. 2. The Contractor shall "tip-back" young trees whenever they encroach upon adjacent vehicular, pedestrian or equestrian traffic. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize each tree on each work site once oar year with the appropriate number of Agrlfona 21 Gram Plant Tablets, or approved equal, per size of tree. 4. The Contractor shall restake any tree nee0ing restaktng. C~t~ c~}f'~33aa~~o C~sc~a~oa~a Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Tem Vista Planned Coaamnnity) Approved: Wllllam J. O'Ndl, Clty Engineer Clt~ of Rancho Asnoil EnO~'a >iepoct l.endecspe Nslntenasce Dlet:ict xa 4 (Tar. vua PLmed commtmigrl FhcelYgr 91/91 The 91 /92 annual report fot Landscape Melntenance District No. 4 Rare vtata Planned Community) fa prepared to compliance with the nqulrementa of Attlcle 4, Chapter 1. DlvLSlon 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State o[ Cabfomia ll.azidscaoe and Lighting ACt of 1972). >: ianascapc nb:..:c.-..::.:.: D°_•~'^~ -4 n.MD N41 remeaenis landscaped sites throughout the Terra Vesta Planned Communiy. 'these alto are aeeociarea wuu a.cae :.:~.::• `-':=`- communtty and 98 such airy bene0l Aextved frao the kandactlpt fmtallatlon can be directly attributed to those pateeh wWwt that communty. Because oCthM, assessments required for th1~ distils[ are charged to those parceb wltldn that plarvned community. The sites mainlahud by the diatrfct rnnslst of parkways. Pascoe. median lslartds and parks. The 9uantitka of mnm~vined BrtaS Conalet oL• Protected /sl SLHOL~ Ground Corer and Shrubs 3.00 5.43 Acres Turf 9.00 5.04 " Equestrian Trails 15414 2254 " Total 2100 3797 " The gmuM ewer and shrubs an maintained ands contract Capital Wprovements within LMD 714 were paid by. and constructed In conJunctloit with. dwelapment by the Testa Vesta Planned Community. Tne majority of the budgeted cents for LMD a4 fs for direct maintauwce of ground cover znd shrubs. These C •nM+^*~s are pmvtded through a Contract Servkat Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance comparry. The protected costa to operate and matntaln LMD M4 art ore follows: Promaed MaintenArrr Budaet: 91/92 Regular Payroll 8173.7A0 Fringe Benefits a57,9TA Mainttnance and Operations 861,919 Vehtde Maintenance and Optratlons 8&5,200 Contingency -Tree Replacttnent 83.300 Contract Servk~Es • Landscape Mafntenenee 8139.[100 • Tree Maintenance 89.500 + Bacldlow Testing 81.900 • Misc. (elec., plumbing. etc.) 87.000 Capital 4cpenditures • Projects 90/91 Creeu/wend damage • 7Yee, shnrb & ground cover $29,700 replacement • Moisture sensor and $20.000 controller/enclosure mstallatlons Capttal Eagrendlturea -Equipment $0 Capital Expenditures • Vehldes $0 water $111,055 Electric $12,517 Subtotal: 71 Acid: Assessment Adminlstratlon ($5 / AU.I $8,875 AAA• (NnrheaA 17.5%of Revenue Requtredl $54.41$ Total Revenue Requved $7aa"162 ttav: Interest and Families ,~y,$j4 Assessmem Revenue Requittd $725.549 Weather damaged trees, shnbs aM ground saver wm be replaced at a cast at $23.'700. Molstum sensors will be lrlstalled at a coat of $20.000. This Is acpected to decrtase water usage. The budgeted amount for water Is $57,427.. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted for 1n 91 /92. $133.000 Ia available m 91/82 from a prbr year reserve [or the preWninary deaigri, design and comWcuon of median Island tetr+oths on Rase I.me Road and Terra Vista Parkway. The Ctty's adnuNStratlve charge for the assessment and collection of that assessment amounts to $5.00/AU. Cor a total of $8,875. The Ctty's admmlvtrathx overhead amounts to 7,59b of the gross revenue nallud for a total of $54,416. Malvala: The 90/91 Assecmmmt Rates for IAtD #4 are as follows: :~$1 Single Family $110.25 Mult1 Famdy >p1.45 Commercial $69.28 Vacant Iarrd $10.25 The Increase In rates Ls aftrmutabk to increased water costs of $50,055 and vehcle rr~alntenance and operations of $75,200 over those of 90/91. w 91/92 Aaadammt R!w The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Unit # o[ ~ d R ~ e 8 S Irrg le Fam11y . Pa rc l 1.87 $240.18 $402,542 Mult1-Family Parcel 1,478 193.42 285,875 Commercial Acre 124.86 284.42 35,513 Vacant Acre 84.54 25.09 j§j@ lbtal Revenue 8725,548 A ptuJected 8362.774 carryover from 80/81 vALL be usW to fund this dlstrtct for fhe 8tat half of 91/92 untll assesamenta are reeeNed N January 92. landscape Maintenance Dlet[kin No. 4 Am!®tlons [o[ Fiscal Yw[ 1981/92 ANNF.~.D ]RACY ANN xF'D Pehlumv 11. 1998 19684 2l i 1990 F 24 AU. . 'TRACT F1'F'p AN e lntarv . 13864-I 2 AU. N ~M .yyP ~~11~IPft 1Ml al ~~1. ~~~~~~~~ ~ OILI~'YW~t TRACT I~iYY6iW.~Q~t 13903 96AU. 19300-1 139Q9-2 ___._ eLnieir •a• ASSESSMENT D~AQRAM LANDSCA?E MAINTENANCE pISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTIN i „MAMITENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t ANO 4 ~:! .. I ~~~ se s~ a ~Y~9 r a. ~ a a ~ w I ~ i I ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ \/i _ ~~ „~ 'J CITY O~ COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDINO STATE ~ CALIFORNIA r' ~r~%~%~ 9~ z 3C 'A' ASSESSMENT DlA~RAM LANDSCAPE MAWTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LICiNTING MAMITENANCE OlSTRICT NOS. t AND 4 L ~l~ z ~ % ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO //a3~ i STATE OF CALIFORNIA w exwar •~• 4'~ ASSESSMENT DIARiRAM LANl13CAPf 'iAASIi'ENANO€ DISTfi1CT NO. STREET LIGFITNQ, MAWTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. z3~ 1 AND 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ' STATE F CALIFORNIA T~-~~' .~~ ~ - t and -Z LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT iMlNTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TURF iWINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall aiow ail turf areas once per week during the period of March 1 to Novc~ber 1; end not less than biweekly during the period of Noveaaber 2 to February 28. 2. The Contractor shall edge all turf grass borders concurrently with each sowing. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all turf area< to arrn..A"w~. r. t!: ~c!:c:;:lc 11-A. 4. The Contractor shall nechanicaliy aerate all turf areas both in the spring and the fall of each year and sere often as required to realise copactlon and stress. 5. The Contractor shall siecbanicaily dethatch all turf areas once per year. This operation should be 4cheduled iswediately prior to aver seeding for those areas that are to be over seeded. 6. The Contractor shaft on an annual basis over seed all areas that do not have a high quallb stand of turf. 7. Concurrently with each sowing, the Contractor shall mechanically "bowl" around alt irrigation heads that are blocked by grass between sowings. 8. The Contractor shall on a weekly basis remove any trash or debris that accusallates on the turf. THE SERYICE LEVEL FOR PEST CONTROL IS: Complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all plant pests and weeds. THE SERYICE LEVEL FOR GROUND COVER MAINTENANCE IS: I. The Contractor shall on a bisanthiy bests trim all ground cover adlacent to any hardscape, structure, flzture, piant or other area into which it should not encroach. 2. The Contractor shall on a biweekly schedule clean any accusolated debris or trash from all ground cover areas. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize ail ground cover areas every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. 4. The Contractor shall at the direction of the City Engineer, saw, or otherwise lower, to a height of three Inches all overgrown ground cover that is afire hazard. 5. The Contractor shall mechanically or chemically "bowl" as often as 1s required around each 1rri9atlon heed that is blocked by ground cover. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR SHRUB MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall prune with shears in March and September ail shrubs, such that each shrub grows without encroaching upon any adfacent improved area, street or sidewalk, ar otherwise becomes a m,hlir hs±,rA 2. The Contractor shad fertilize all shrubs every 180 days using 6-6-6 with trace elements or approved equal. THE SERYICE LEVEL FOR PINE M111NTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shalt trim vines once per year In September. 2. The Contractor shall re-attach to a wa1T or fence once per year in September vines that fall off the wall by using the attachments required on the construction plans for the site. 3. The Contractor shall annually, 1n September, remove ail vines that grow Into undesirable places such as trees or shrubs. 4. The Contractor shall fertilize all vines every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. THE SERYICE LEVEL FOR TREE MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall trim to a height of fifteen feet above grade, trees on the work sites t0 smintaln them to a safe condition including vehicle, pedestrian and equestrian clearance and free of dead, diseased and dying wood and "hangers or other public hazards. Any hazard above that height will be reported to the City Engineer. 2. The Contractor shall "tip-back' young trees whenever they encroach upon ad,~acent vehicuiar, pedestrian or equestrian traffic. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize each tree on each work site once per year with the appropriate number of Agrifonr 21 Gram Plant Tablets, or approved equai, per size of tree. 4. The Contractor shall restake any tree needing restaking. C~t~j q~f' I~3~c~u~o ~r~a~o~a Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance Mstrict No. 5 (Tot Lot) Approved: Wllliam J. O Nell, City Engineer tlti of ltaanho Copmmp Annual Eogloaeda >bPlut Landscape Maintenauce Dla4let eta 6 trot lotl FOtal Year 91/91 The 91 /92 annual report toY landscape Maintenance Dtstrlct No. 5 (tot LoU 1s prepared ht c,unpliarttt with the requirements otAtYlcie 4. Chapter 1. Dlvblon 5 0(the Streets and F[Ighways Code, State of California (Landscape and Ughting Act of 1972). .,.,,;,,:~,;, :'.o:..:c..e.ar uuantt va tiAPtD •51 rnprearnb a IaMsceped Tot lat. 17tis site is associated with a group ot44 single [atnily panxls which all have a cannon usage of the Tot Lot such that arty beneat derived from the lendamyalg can be directly attributed to those particular paretlo. Because of this, aseeAerrienb requt:ed for this dislrfct are chatged to [host apectOC parcels. Tfiere b only one sae matraalned by the distrtct. it catatsis of a Tot Iat with a small emoum of shrub beds and ground cover. The quantltlee of mahdalrted areas consist oL PmJected s/so/91 6/30/91 Ground Corer and Shrubs Q${ Q$4 Acres Total 0~ The ground corer and shrubs are malntaated under conhact. Capital lmprwements within I1~1D MS were paid by and constructed 1n conJunctlon with development o(the 44 pants wahlrr the dlstnet. The maJortty of the budgeted coats for IbN MS are Cordate[ maintenantt of ground cover and shrubs. These (unctions are provided through a Contract Servlcp Agreement the Clty has with a Prtvab landscape rmintenance tompanY• ']he projected costs to operate and mamtam LAID t'S are as tollows: 91/92 Regular Payroll $360 Fringe Hentlits $120 Malnlenarce and Opcmttona $989 Vehicle Maintenance and Opem[SOns $66 Contingency -Tree Replacement $SD ContraM Senrlces • Landscape Mamtenance $2,902 • Tree Maintenance $0 • Hacldlow Testing $185 • Mlle. (elec.. plumbing, eteJ $0 Capaal FScpenditures - Projects 90/91 4[ae/wind damage • 7Yee, shnrb & ground ewer $0 rcplattment • Holston aeresor and 80 controller/enclosure lnstallatlons Capital Expenditures - EgWpment 8p Capital Exprndaurcs - Vehicles 8p Water $195 ElecMC 8127 Subtotal: ~,$~4 Add: Assessment Admtrustrstlon i85 / AU.) 82pp Add: Overhead (7.5% of Revenue Required) ~~ Total Revenue Requfred l4..9~4 1<as: interest and PeualUes ~~ Assessment Revenue Required Projected costa have been rcvluceA by the elhnhca[bn of the replacement of weather damaged shrubs a~ ground cover, in addition, ncotsturc sensor ImtaSatlon has been deferred to later yearn. Thee act. while demeasfng tbced capital outlay, m~ have a delrtmental a(feM on water usage. The budgeted amount for water Is 6195. No vehicle or equipment pucchaara are budgeted for 1n 91 /92. The C1tys admixdstratlve c]carge for the assessment and collection of that assessment amounts to 85.00/AU. for a total o[ 8200. The C1ly's adminlgtrathe overhead amounts to 7.5% of the gross revenue realized for a total 0!8315. R 91/98 Aaaeatment v.s.- In 90/91, the Assessment Rate for I.bID M5 was 8105.00/AU. The rate will remain at 8105.00/AU. for 91 /92. I1sID MS coavlats of 40 Assessment Units U.U.1. Those AU. will generate 84,200 revenue required for the dlvtrlet. Unit sot Hale Unit AdJusted ~re Famlly Pa~ ~~ 81~ 0~p F 10 r 8180 a B,~ 4 Total Revenue 8,120p A ProJeMed 82.300 carryover from 90/91 w19 be used to fund thin district for the 9rst half of 91 /92 until assessments ace recewed In January 92. LAifiSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MAINTEkANCE SPECIFICATIONS THE SERVICE LEVEL FCR TURF MAINTENANCE 15: 1. The Contractor shall Bow all turf areas once per week during the period of March 1 to November 1; and not less than biweekly during the period of NoveBber 2 to Februery 28. 2. The Contractor shall edge all turf grass borders Concurrently with each Bowing. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize a71 Lurf areas in .~~~+da~ee ~!~`. ~.;;~~~;~ r• . 4. The Contractor shall Bethanlcally aerate all turf areas Doth to the spring and the fall of eaeh year and sore often as required t0 reduce coBpactlon and stress. 5. The Contractor shall Bechanically dethatch all turf areas once per year. Thts operatlan should be scheduled lewedlately prior to over seeding far those areas that are to be over seeded. 6. The Contractor shell on an annual basis over seed all areas that do not have a high quality stand o} Wrf. 7. Concurrently with each Bowing, the Contractor shall mechanically "bowl" around all irrtgatlon heads that are blocked by grass between Bowings. 8. The Contractor shall on a weekly basis reBOVe arty trash or debris that accuBUlates on the turf. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR PEST CONTROL 2S: CoBplete and continuous control and/or eradication of all plant pests and weeds. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR GROLND COYER MAINTENANCE IS: I. The Contractor shall on a btaanthly basis tr1B atl ground cover ad,~acent to aRy hardscape, structure, fixture, plant or other area into which it should not encroach. 2. The Contractor shall on a btweekiy schedule clean any accuBUiated debris or trash fraB all ground cover areas. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all ground cover areas every 190 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. 4. The Contractor shall at the direction of the City Engfneer, mow, or otherwise lower, to a height of three inehes all overgrown ground cover that is a fire hazard. 5. The Contractor shall mechanically or chemically "bowl" as often as 1s required around each irrigation head that is blocked by ground cover. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR SHRUB MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall prune with shears 1n March and September all shrubs, such that each shrub grows without encroaching upon aqy adjacent improved area, street or sidewalk, or othenise becomes a ouhlir h"+..~ 2. The Contractor shall fertilize all shrubs every 1811 days using 6-6-6 with trace elements or approved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR PINE MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall trim vines once Der year in September. 2. The Contractor shoji n-attach to a wall ar fence once per year in September vines that fall off the wall by using the attachments required an the construction plans for the site. 3. The Contractor shall annually, 1n September, remove all vines that grow Into undesirable places such as trees or shrubs. d. The Contractor shall fertilize all vines every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TREE MAINTENANCE IS: 1. the Contractor shall trim to a height of flficeen feet above grade, trees on the work sites to maintain them 1n a safe condition including veAlcle, pedestrian and equuestrian clearanx and free of dead, diseased and dying wood and "hangers or other public hazards. Any hazard above that helghr will be reported to the City Engineer. 2. The Contractor shall "tip-back" young Lrees whenever they encroach upon adjacent veAlcular, pedestrian or equestrian traffic. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize each tree on each work site once per year with the appropriate number of Agrifor7t 21 Gram Plent Tablets, or approved equal, per size of tree. 4. TAe Contractor shall restake ary tree n.:^ding restaking. C~f~j ~ ~ar~c~~o C~ac~a~©~c~ Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Commanitp) Approved: Wllllam J. O'Nell, City Engineer tltY o[Raealm Coemmp Aanaal EnQlrrser'a Report Landscape 1Malatenanoe 11btAct No. 8 (Caryn Plumed Community) PlaCal Year 91/92 The 91 /92 annual report for Iandxape Mantenance DLaMM No. 6 (Caryrt Planned Community) Is prepared m mmpllance with the nqukementa oCArtIMe 4, Chapter 1, Dtvlsion 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Cahfocnia (Landxape and L15httng Act of 1972). y Iandxape Maintervurce Dlshlct e6 p.MD i6) represents lerideeaped sites tltmughwt the Caryn Planned Co®urdty. These site are aaecMated with areas tNthm that community and as such a~ ixne0t derived from the lardxape tnsteHatlon can be dtrectty atMbuted to those parcels wlthm that ernmnmgy. Because Of th18. assessments requlrsd for this dlstrtet are charged to those patels within that piarmed community. This district consists oC parkways. Pascoe and as equeatrlen trail. The querdltlea of mamtamed areas consist of: Gmund Covtr and Shrubs Turf Equestrian TraOs Total 5L3QL81 ProJeeted SL30L92 Io.00 12.09 Acres 2.00 2.89 " $~Q $,QQ " 1500 17;98 " The Bound cover and stwbs are mamtalned user contract Capital tmprovemenis wdhm IMD NB were paid by, and mnatruMed 1n mnJunetbn with, development by the Caryn Planned Ctmmunity. The maJortty of the budgeted casts for I1YID 116 att for dLtict maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These Cunctlons aze provided through a Contract Servkes Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance comparry. The proJeMed meta to operate and mamtam I1HD NB an as follows: 91192 Regular PaymO ]rrirtge BeneOta Mamtenane and Operatbos VehMle Maintenance and f)petatlons Contingency -Tree Replacement CantraM Services • landscape Mantenance • 7Yee Maintenance • Bacldlow Testing A6,670 tl2,220 >P15,384 X1,914 t)0 $161,000 !5.430 •1,ezs • Mlse, (elec., plumbing, etc.) $2000 Capital 8lrperMlltures - ProJecta 90/91 freeze/wind tlamage • '4Yte, shrub A ground corer $11,663 rephueatent • Mofatvre sensor and $6.000 controller/enclosure mstallattons Capital Esperidltures • Equipment 50 Capital Eependltures -Vehicles $O Water $45,941 Electr(c ®1,535 Subtotal: $~ Add; s~•~~•nt Admitdstratlon l55 / AU.) 55,860 Add; Overhead (7.5% d Revenue Required) 420.Gli,Y Total Revenue Requitsd Less: Interest and Peneltles }3~.;j@4 Assessment Revenue Requited 527 511 Weather damaged trees, shrubs aad gmutd covet win be rePlaad at a cost d $11.663. Moisture aerisors wie be itutalled at a toad of 58,000. This Lv ezpected to derrea+e water usage. The budgeted amount for water b 545.941.. No vehicle or equtpmrnt purchases are budgeted form 91/92. The C1ty's adminlstratlve charge Cor the assessment and collection of that asaesamem amounts to $5.00/AU. for a toW of 55.850. The City's admimatratNe overhead amounts to 7.596 of th^_ gross revenue realized for a total of $20,863. Analvafs• In 90/91, the Assessmmt Rate for I.MD MB was $195.00/AU. The mereaae to $235.48/AU. is pHrmrlly attributable to Iricresaed water costs of $7.941. The Co0owmg itemizes the assessment rate Cor the distrJCt: Udt N of Base Unlt AdJuated landSl9C 1htG Slnlie 5/Unit I:SCI9Z $SLC BC1tCIIYL Single Family Parcels 1,]70 5235.48 1.0 5235.48 #22531 Total Revenue 5275.511 A protected $137,756 carryover from 90/91 wlil bt used to fund this tllstrtct for the llrst half of 91 /92 untll assessments are receNed m January 92. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT W1lNTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TURF IAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall vow all wrf areas once per week during the pentad of March 1 w Noveiaber I; and not less than biweekly during Y1w: period of Novevber 2 w February 28. 2. The Contracwr shall edge all wrf grass borders concurrently with each vowing. 3. The COntretwr shall f.rr111>« wil h_.c ~,_-- !; L:.3l.~SuLe ~;ii~ Sciieduie II-A. 4. The Contractor shall rechantcally aerate all turf areas both In the spring and the fall of each year and vore often as required w reduce covpaction and stress. 5. The Contractor shall vechanically dethawh all turf areas once per year. This operation should be 'scheduled lvaedlately prier w over seeding for those areas that are w be over Seeded. 6. The Contractor shall on an annual basis over seed all areas that do not have a high quality stand of wrf. 7. Concurrently with each vowing, the Contractor shall vechanically "bowl" around all irrigation heads that are blocked by grass between vows ngs. 6. The Contractor shall on a weekly basis revove any trash or debris that accuvutates on the wrf. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR PEST CONTROL IS: Covplete and continuous control and/or eradication of all plant pests and weeds. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR GROUND COVER MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall on a biaanthly basis tr1^ all ground rnver ad,1acent w arq hardscape, 5trucwre, fixture, plant or other area Into which it should not encroach. 2. The Contracwr shall on a biweekly schedule clean aqy accuvuiated debris or trash frav all ground cover areas. 3. The Contracwr shall fertilize all ground cover areas every 180 days with 6-d-6 or approved equal. 4. The Contractor shall at the direction of the City Engineer, aaav, or otherwise lower, to a height of three inches all overgrown ground cover that is a fire hazard. 5. The Contractor shall mechanically or chemically "bowl" as often as 1s required around each ir~igatlon head that 1s blocked by ground cover. THE SERYILE LEVEL FOR SN!tU8 MAINTENANCE 15: 1. The Contractor shall prune with sheaas in March and Septea~ber all shrubs, such that each shrub grows without encroaching upon aRy adiacent tiproved area, street or sidewalk, or otherwise becomes a public hazard. 2. The Contractor shall fertilize all shrubs every 180 days using B-6-6 with trace elements or approved equal. THE SERYILE LEVEL FOR VINE MAINTENANCE iS: 1. The Contractor shall trim vines once per year in September. 2. The Contractor shall re-attach to a wall or fence once per year in September vines that fall off the wall Dy using the attachments required on the construction plans for the site. 3. the Contractor shall annually, to September, remove all vines that grow into undesirable places such as trees or shrubs. 4. The Contractor shall fertilize all vines every 180 days with 6-6-6 or aDDroved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TREE MAINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall trim co a height of fifteen feet above grade, trees on the work sites to maintain them in a safe condition including vehicle, pedestrian and equestrian clearance and free of dead, diseased and dying wood and 'hangers' or other public hazards. Any hazard above that height will be reported t0 the City Engineer. 2. The Contractor shall "tip-back' young trees whenever they encroach upon adiacent vehicular, pedestrian or equestrian Lrafflc. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize each tree on each work site once per year with the appropriate number of Agriforw 21 Gram Plant Tablets, or approved equal, per size of tree. 4. The Contractor shall restake any tree needing restaking. C~t~j q~'~3c~~~o C~c~o~a Annual Engiaeer's Report Landscape Maiatcaance District No. 7 (Etiwanda North Approved: W11Lam J. O'Nefl, City Engineer CItY of>sanchs Cnc.mtttowp Amaze PagWeer's deport Lndatape Nsfutensnce DlaMot No. 7 ~ttwanda ttorlh) 1Man! Year 91/92 The 91 /92 annual report for Lv~dscape Maintenance DL4Lr1M No. 7 (Etlwanda Nort/d k prepared In compliance with the rcqulremmta of Article 4, Chapter 1, Dtvlafon S of the Streets and Highways Cade. State o(Cabfomla (•andscepe and L1ghting.Mt of 19727. Landscape Mafotenana Dlstrkt X7 IIAfD A~ represents landscaped ettes throughout Ettwanda Highlands. Thex site are aseacwted with areas wlthm that cammuNty and as such arty benefit derived from the landsrape tr!stapatim cad be directly attributed to those paz::e7s waldn that community. Because Of this, asaes®ents required for this district are charged to Urox parcek within that planned commumly. As the Etlwanda Highlands devebP• more parcels will lx annexed Into the dlatr(ct. The sites malntalned b.Y the dtsfrlM corislsts of ground cover and aifruW, tuff and equestrian trolls. 91 /92 well be the Bret year In which the dlstrlet will moi.»..m the !andscaping. The quantities of mahttalned areas conaiM oC Ground Cover and Shnrbs Turf EquesttYan Trolls Total SL30L81 Protected 6L~4[~ N/A 7.81 Acres N/A 455 " NJ9 , ~ " N/A 14.36 " The Bound cover and shrubs are maintained under contraM. Capital improvements vvhhat LMD t)7 were pall by, ~ constructed In mntunMbn with, developmmt by the Etlwanda Highlands. The matortty otthe budgeted costa for I.MD k7 are for direct maintenance of Ground cover and shrubs. These functions are Pravlded through a Contract Serviced Agreement the City has w/tlr a private landscape malnteriance company. Tht projected costs to operate and mafntaln IMD s7 are as follows: ProoosM Man . ~.,.. P .da t 91/92 Regular Payroll ~,75p FYfnge Bmenta a1,25o Mamtenance and Operations x33,845 Vehfek Mamtenance and Operations 53,934 Conlingency - Tn!e Replacement 120,000 Contract Servltts • [andxape Maintenance >4160,850 • Tree Maintenance x624,000 • Bacldlow Testing $325 • Misc. (elec.. Plumbing, etc.) $6,275 Capital Expenditures • Protects 90/91 freeze/wind damage • Tree, shrub & ground cover $0 replacement • Mofature sensor and _ ~ •',,~p controller/enclosure 1nst.rllatlons Capital Expenutures - Equtpment $0 Capital F~cperrd!ture~ -Vehicles $p Water $27 584 Electric $921 Subtotal: $1~ Add: :.:sessrnent AdmiNStmtlon 1$5 / AU.) $3,845 '.1. Overhead (7.596 of Revenue Requtred) 4 lot Total ~,Q~ L.es+ss: Inteast and Penalties Assessment Revenue Required $ Protected costa have beta seduced bq the cllminatioa of the replacement of weather damaged trees, sluubs aM ground cover. IAfolature sermota will be in~lslled at a rnst of $15,000. '!7da wh' expect to decmaee water usage. The Su seed amount for water Is $27,564„ No vehk!e or equipment purolfase9 are budgeted~or m 91/92. The Ctty's admf•ushative charge for the assessment and collectlon o.: has assessment amounts to °.o.00/AU. for a total of $3,845. The City's admmfatratNC ;r; erhead amount= :0 7.596 of the gross revenue realized for a total a<$23,101. In 90/91, the Assessment Rate for I1rID F7 was $75.00/AU. The inerease to $400.54/AU. Is attributable to tricreased water costa n4613,584 and Contract Servkes of $10.3,550 over that of 90/91. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the diatrkt: UN[ x of (lase Un1t Adtusted Si~ng~le Family Parcels 769 g s400.54 1041 $400.54 ' Total Revenue 015 The General Fund will fund th19 district for the ibst hall of 91/92 untll assessments arc reretved m January 92. I.e[xlacaye Maintenance Dlatnct No. 7 Revkw dPYacal Year 1991/92 Doling FYacel Year 1990/91, the folbwing tracts have Ucm annexed Into lhia dletrtet: TRACT m~ 16. 198(1 19.565 Mav 18 1990 90 AU. jj TKAI:I' . 135bb-O 1990 JO nu. j2 TRACT 6fav 16 19566.8 6 1990 96 AU. ]~ TRACT . ~ 1 19568-7 ~ 16 1990 M AU. '['[TACT . Mav 13568.9 16 1990 43 AU. pNNi''xFD TRACT u . mgy 135659 c d M lo 1990 40 AU. :xr`D Annq TRACT .r em , r 13812 153 AU. -----~ ~ '~ I ,~ ~~~ ~, ~~ .!=~~~ -~ _, I .. ,. I „ , '~~ ~~ I ~~ ~1 ~~ ~~ , CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONliA . COUNTY Of SAN BERNARpINO 'r r- .~ TR 1.356_S._ ~,~ , STATE OR CALIFORNIA ~ .1-h,~-~__ -~~-r= ~ 9 3 z ss E%M1111T •~• Rescl ~ti on No. 30-3:1 ~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Rage 7 I assESSr~Fr:T ~!~,uRar~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M0. 7 ~ ~ \~ / ~ . ~ ,09 ~ 1 iQv, 1 'Frv~ 3 `~~ /3 ~ 4 /~ 5 G G 1O 76 6 ~ bra B 1/ /7 ~ 3/ 9 Pit a~ 12 76 7 o rRC ~m \ /~ -~ 13 /J E /1 -~ .i .33 S9 24 /•6 0 37 4 ~ ZB Z3 /3 I /C ~ ~ 3L 27 2!a /2 // ~ ~ ~ ~~~ _ _ 24TH STREET ~- 11 ~~~ CRV MAWTAMED LANDSCAPE AREA TgEE NIAWTENANCE ~~~~~ EOUESRAN TRAl MAWTENANCE TRACT 13565 PHASE 5 E` A"O~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "T~`' ```~O ~ `\'_ ~ 'EXHIBIT A' / rat -_ C; l -i '~ : n ~; ~~~_ ~3z~C N V ll,_ _1> 1!^ ^,SSESS Y1E"dT ~IAGRA"~" LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 7 ~~~~ CfTV MANTA~ED LAlOSCAPE AREA THEE MAINTEM~MDE •~~~~• EDUESTRAIN TRAL MANTENANCE TRACT 13565 PHASE 8 o~` ""O:b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~ •`. c` '~ ~rY;;ry s c; ~'i is ~~ ~ ~> ~,n <<t i~; A 'EXHIBIT A' N J f ASSESSMENT DIAGF=sAivi LANngq,goE nnpln!TED:ANCE OL°,TRIGT "d0' ~1 ~~~~ CITY MAMAMED LANDSCAPE APEA TREE NW7TENANCE •~~~~~ ECUESTRAN TRAL MANTENANCE TRACT 13565 PHASE 9 ,a" ~~~Otcy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA +~ ~ \,~ ~` 4 X ~a ~: ~' ~L Ey ~ un AAA IT<<i~; I 'E:CHIBIT A' N I-- ASSESSMENT DLAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 ,9 v~ , 3c ~k~ g ~~ ~~~~ CRV MANTAfED LANbSCAPE AREA TREE MAINTENANCE •~~~~• EOIlESTRAM TRAI MANTENANCE TRACT 13565 PHASE 7 ,o" ""O:r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOrIGA , T i7~~~ ~> `c: R a :c ~~ ,> ~ ~' ~~ `_ ~' 3 z S~' un AA tiQe; A 'EXHIBIT A' N - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAfvI L:.NCSC:pa~ pA i+.ii~TEN:. h:CE DIS?RIGT NO. 7 ~~~~ pTY IAAIRTANFD UN[15CAVE AREA ~ TREE MAwTERA~ •~~~~• ECUE6Tf1AN TRAL MAwTENANCE TRACT 13565 PHASE 6 o<< ""~,t~~ CITY OF RANCHO GUCAMOPIGA C ~~ VI I> nn lit[; =exHi_ ei~_ r1 - lXMOIT •A• ~ESSI~NT oiml~~, NDSCAPE MAINTENANC: DI.RTAICT NO. 7 s~tEEr ~Nat~ oisr~cr Nos. ~ aNO ~ _.. _ . _..,.. ~ ~. ~ N _. ~. 1' nt1'. tNN ~ny_ ~_ ~~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ 1 1~ i ~ ii i ~ ~' ~ •~ j, ~E , ` _ i _ " . t, .. , _~ ~ w ••~ n •tNN ~ . . G i•twwl h ~ t...r~ vtns~ F NNN b E S .c ;~ ~; ~ ~ 9~ i : r. I' 1 t ~, ~~ ~:~ ~ I ~~ . w.~.~h y us orrr~'i ~ ,~ t~ r ~ ~ ..,,... .N,. ,•~M6l~niw~i ~, ~ ~ I ptT '~. • Y ..` '`II I I E ~]~ ~ `1I ~~i•MM ~AtIt ` tllS 11~..~\T~ 1 V / Mty • N.Y~ ~y ~ 1•GINO 41p! uw.r~o ~I~ i ~~ } {FFi r. ~ ±~ ~, ~~ t~rr~ry... y2 -run A`I.Mx~M.•• YIj NI• Ni® "~ I i jS I. VV S Y ~I W~ yl I ~ AM ~'y r TT u N • . w w ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONaA COUNTY OR sAN BERNARDINO 1 ~ BTATE OF CALIFORNIA TR ~38f2 ~ ~ .~ z ~a LANDSCAPE IANINTENANCE DISTRICT MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS THE SERVICE LEYEL FOR TURF MAINTENANCE I5: 1. The Contractor shall sow all turf areas once per week during the period of March 1 Lo Novesber 1; and not less than biweekly during the period of Noveeber 2 to February 28. 2. The Contractor shall edge all turf grass borders concurrently with each sowing. II-A. 4. The Contractor shall awKhanically aerate all turf areas both in the spring and the fall of each year and sore often as required to reduce caspactlon and stress. 5. The Contractor shall aiechanlcally dethatch all turf areas once per year. This operation should be scheduled lanedlately prior to over seeding for those areas that are to be over seeded. 6. The Contractor shall on an annual 'oasis over seed all areas that do not have a high quality stand of turf. 7. Concurrently with each sowing, the Contractor shall sechan1ca11y "bowl" around all trrigat/on heads that are blocked by grass between arowtngs. 8. The Contractor shall on a weekly basis resove any trash or debris that accusulates on the turf. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR PEST CDNTROL IS: Casiplete and continuous control and/or eradication of ail plant pests and weeds. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR tltOUND CODER lANINTENANCE I5: 1. The Contractor shall on a biagnthly basis tris all ground cover ad,~acent to any hardscape, structure, future, plant or other area into which it should not encroach. 2. The Contractor shall on a biweekly schedule clean any accuawlated debris or trash fros all ground rover areas. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all ground cover areas every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. 4. The Contractor shall -! ?`e direction of the City Engineer, mow, or otherwise lower, ~a a height of throe inches all overgrown ground cover that is afire haxard. 5. The Contractor shall sechanlcally or chemically "bowl" as often as is required around eech irrigation head that is blocked by ground cover. THE SERVICE LEVEL FCR SHRUG IMINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall Drune with shears in March and September all shrubs, such that eacA shrub grows without encroaching upon aW adJacent improved area, street or sidewalk, or otherwise becomes a public hazard. 2. The Contractor shall fertilize all shrubs every 180 dsys using 6-6-6 with trace elements or approved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL FGR VINE M1IINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall tri^ vines once per year in September. 2. The Contractor sMll re-attach to a wall or fence once per year in September vines that fall off the wall by using the attachments required on the construction plans for the site. 3. The Contractor shall annually, 1n September, remove all vines that grow into undesirable places such as trees or shrubs. 4. The Contractor shall fertilize all vines every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. THE SERYICE LEVEL FOR TREE M1IINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall trim to a height of fifteen feet above grade, trees on the cork sites to maintain them 1n a safe condition including vehicle, pedestrian and equestrian elearenee and free of dead, diseased and Qy1ng wood and "hangers' or other public hazards. Any hazard above Chet height will De reported to the City Engineer. 2. The Contractor shall "tip-back" young trees whenever they encroach upon adiacent vehicular, pedestrian or equestrian traffic. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize each tree on each work site once per year with Lhe appropriate number of Agrlfona 21 Gram P1anL Tablets, or approved equal, per size of tree. 4. The Contractor shall restake any tree needing restaking. C~t~q~f'~3a~c~~o C~SC~c~o~a Annual Eaglaeer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (Etiwaada Sontri) Approved• Wllltam J. O'Neil. Ctty Engineer City of Rancho Caeamoap Amon mpnnew Bevort Landscape Yalntenance DLnlel N0. 8 (Etlwanda 9ootW FLeal Yqr 91/91 The 91 /92 amual report for landscape Maintenance DiahiM No, 8 (Etlwanda South) V prepared 1n comp8antt with the rcquuements a<Artick 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Caflfomia 8andscape and L.Ighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance Dlstrlet M8 (LMD iel represema landscaped sites throughout that portion of the Lrtlwanda arcs of the City prlmaray located south ~ Highland Avenue. north of Foothi9 Hou]wHrd ared east of Etlwanda Avenue. These s#e are associated with areas wtthm that area aM as such any benefit derived amr the landscape instauet»n es3n be directly attributed to those pamb within that errs. Because of thLa assesementa requtred for this dlstdct are ehargW to those parala within that portion of >:tiuwanda. The sites maintamed by the district conslsla of grormd corer aM shrubs and turf. 91/92 w1ll be the fleet year In which the district will maintain the laridacaping. The quantftees of maintained arras consist ot• Ground Cover and Shrubs Turf Total a/7r1/91 Pro)ected 6/grt/m N/A 0.23 Acres N/~ Q(Ki " N/A 0.29 " The ground cover and shrubs are maintained under contrail. Capital improvements w1Ih111 LMD k8 wen paid by, and constneMed !n confunetion with, development within that portion of Etiwande. The maJonty of the budgeted costs for LMD NB are for dlrcil matntenertce of ground cover and ahrube. These furectlona are provided through a Contract Services Ageanent the City has with a private landscape maintenance compaety. The proJeMed coats to operate and maintain 1A41 Na are as CoBowa: 91/92 Regular Payroll Sgp Fnnge Benefits 530 Mafateaance and Opecatlons 52,209 Vehtete Malntenattce and Opemtloera 5370 Contingency - Trce Replacement 5840 Contract Services • Landscape Malntenartce 54.537 • Tree Maintenance 5800 • Baddlow Testing $165 • Misc. (elec.. plumbing, eteJ $200 Capital 1?Srpendltutts -Protects 90/91 Oxere/wend damage • 'IYee, shrub & ground cover $O replacement • Mobture sensor aM $0 controller/enclosure Installations CapIW t]tpenditurea • Egwpmmt $O CaptW FStpmdltures • Vehicles $O Water $611 Electric $75 __ Subtotal: _ >N,917 Add: Assessment Adminlstratlon ($S / AU.) $36,5 Add: Ovefiead 8385 total l11.4T! Irss: Interest and Penaltks >t¢Z Assessment Revenue Requhed 10 801 Protected costs have been reduced by the eilmmatbn of the replacement of weather damaged [rtes. shmbe and grand cover. In addltbn, mmeture sensor Dr&allatlon has been deferred to later years. 17da act, while decreaatng thM capllal outlay, may have a detrimental a8ect on water usage. 1Te budgeted amount Por waters $811.. No vehtck or equipment purchases are budgeted form 91/92. The City's admDLStraWe charge for the aeaeasment and cotlectlon of that assessment amounts to $5.00/AU. for a total of $365. The City's admaristmnve overhead amounts to 7.596 of the genus revenue reahred for a total o[ $79b. In 90/91, the Aastssmrnt bate far IAm M8 was 895.00/AU. The locteese W $145.22/AU. is attributable to increased Operatbrrs and Maintenance d 8393 and Contract Servkea of $1,535 over 90/91. 1791/~vaa~t~ Rate The following ltemlres the 8mesvment rate for the dlst.net: unit • of Base Un1t Adtusted I~11dtZ9i TY9C Units A/UNt Factor BaLff BC52nLL4 Single Fam9y Parcels 73 $145.22 1.0 $145.22 !10.601 Total Revenue 10 601 A protected $5,300 carryover from 90/91 wl9 be used to fund thly district for the Brat half of 91/92 untJl avana•...wnt• aIe received m January 92. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT M111NTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR TURF WIINTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall mow all turf areas once per week during the period of March 1 to November 1; and oat Tess than biweekly during the period of November 2 Lo February 28. 2. The Contractor shall edge all turf grass borders concurrently with each sowing. i TMs rnnf..nh... .6.11 sn-~"1t-.. .~~ ._t .._ __.. _. -..~. ...-.. ... ...... w•~ ..•~ d'i cda iG dL~G~wuw w; iii ~o;muuiC II-A. 4. The Contractor shall sechanlcally aerate all turf areas both in the sprtng and the fall of each year and sore often as required to reduce compaction and stress. 5. The Contractor shall amchanically dethatch all turf areas once per year. This operation should be scheduled lwaediately prior to over seeding for those areas that are to be over seeded. 6. The Contractor shall on an annual basis over seed all areas that do not have a high quality stand of Wrf. 7. Concurrently with each sowing, the Contractor shall mechanically "bowl" around all irrigation heads that arc blocked by grass between sowings. 8. The Contractor shall on a weekly basis resove any trash or debris that accumulates on the turf. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR PEST CONTROL IS: Complete and continuous control and/or eradication of all plant pests end weeds. THE SERVICE LEVEL FOR GROUND COYER lY1INTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall on a bimonthly basis trim all ground rnver ad,~acent to any hardscape, structure, fixture, plant or other area lots which it should not encroach. 2. The Contractor shall on a biweekly schedule clean aqy aceuamlated debris or trash fram all ground cover areas. 3. The Contractor shall fertilize all ground cover areas every 180 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. 4. The Contractor shalt aL the direction of t!x City Engineer, mow, or otherwise lower, to a height oP three lnehes alt overgrown ground cover that is afire hazard. 5. The Contractor shell nechanteally or cheslcally "bows" as often as is required around each trrigation head that is blocked by ground cover. THE SERYICE LEVEL FOR SHRUB M1INTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall prune with shears to March and Septead+er ell shrubs, such that each shrub grows without encroaching upon aqy adjacent tsproved area, street or sidewalk, or otherwise becooes a pu611c riazard. 2. The Contractor shall terttltze all shrubs evm~ ..""..."»-;= ~~s~nn 5_6-6 with trace elenents or approved equal. THE SERVICE LEVEL Fqt VINE lN1INTENANCE IS: 1. The Contractor shall tr1^ vines once par year 1n Septes~ber. 2. The Contractor shall re-attach W a wall or fence once per year in Septe~ber vines that fall off the wall by using the attachaents required on the construction plans for the site. 3. The Contractor shall annually, in SeDtenber, reawve all vines that grow into undesirable places such as trees or shrubs. 4. The Contractor shall fertilize all vines every 100 days with 6-6-6 or approved equal. THE SERYICE LEYEL FOR TREE MAINTENANCE I5: 1. The Contractor shall tr1^ to a height of tliteen feet above grade, trees on the work sites to abintaln thM in a ssfe condition tnd using vehicle, pedestrian and equestrian clearantt and free of dead, diseased and dying wood and 'hangers or other public hazards. Any hazard above Lhat height will be reported Lo the Ctty Engineer. 2. The Contractor shell "t1p-back' young trees whenever they encroach Upon adjacent vehicular, pedestrian or equestrian traffic. 3. The Contractor shad fertilize each tree on each work site once per year with the appropriate nueber of ggrifor• 21 Grew Plant Tablets, or approved equal, per size of tree. 4. The Contractor shall resteke any tree needing rostaking. CITY O^< RA':CHO CL'CAII4(!N04 STAFF REPORr1' ~_ DATE: June 5, 1991 TO: Mayor, Members of City Councll & City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director I3Y: Wm. Jce O'Ne11, Clty Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND acV-.--r~~rn_ a nnnr tr uRAR7Nl: FOR JULY 3. 1991, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 It is recommended that City Council approve the preliminary Engineer's Reports and set a Public Hearing for July 3, 1991, to levy the annual assessments and approve the Engineer's Reporta for Street Lighting Maintenance DSsMct Nos. 7, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Through detaffetl monitoring of revenue, expenditures and the Increase in utility costs, it has become necessary to Increase the rate in Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 from $9.25 to $10.17 for Fiscal Year 1991/92. However, Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 2 through 6 will remain at $'10.00 for Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92. There is not any recommended increase in Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 7 and 8. This is the first yeaz these two districts aze being placed on the County Tax Roll. City Cowzcll approved rebates for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 2 through 5 In Fiscal Year 1990/91. These rebates were never disbursed because staff is sell working with Southern Callfomta Edison in resolving the issue of overcharging to the developers and refunding may be forthcoming to Edison. Additionally, staff feels that any surplus that may remain after the issue with Edison is resolved, can be used towards street signal lighting energy and repair as they become necessary and this strategy can be effective in stabilizing rate Increases until these surpluses aze expended. Street IARhting Maintenance District No I - elrteri~7 An Assessment increase is recommended in this district, fcom $9.25 to $10.17 for Fiscal Year 1991/92. ~~ CRY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY EN.G[A'EER'S REPORTS June 5. 1991 Page 2 - tre t..ilY tfn~ M tnten n Dis *i No. 2 - M 1 There is no recommended assessment rate increase. at $20.00 for Flacal Y-eaz 19!11/92. re t iah tn~ M tnt ~ aner Dis NM No. 9 - Victoria There is no recommended assessment rate increase. at $20.00 for Fiscal Year 1991/92. 5 rn t .t~lya~ M tnter+an Dls rtM No. 4- T r,n V s The rate wW remain Planned omm + ttv The rate will remain ta Plann d o m mitt/ There is no rernmmended assessment rate Increase. The rate will remain at $20.00 for Fiscal Year 1991/92. Street tn~ Maintena_nee District No. 5 - Caryn Pla nned Corranu_n~ty There is no rernmmended assessment rate Increase. The rate wlll remain at $20.00 for Fiscal Year 1991/92. t Ltahti te t N 6 - Co er Str M i Dl t l cial/I st ial d ee ng a n nance s r c o. mm There is no recommended assessment rate increase. r n u The rate wID remain at $20.00 for Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92. re ta tn d tN D1 t N N th E t 7 + i~nd . ~ ce or n enar s C o - a The assessment rate for this district 1s $32.16 far Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92. r t i h tna M ±nt Dl t N S ih Ett *+ t*+ 8 +d a en? ce c o. ou a - * a The assessment rate for this district is ffi121.92 for Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92. Respectfully sub m itt ed ~ ~ ~ /~/ ~^ Rick Gomez /~/,~ Community Development Director RG:WJOJmf Attachments: Resolutrons Engineer's Reports q4~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJF.C770NS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Councl of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Ltghttng Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, dcea resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance DlsMcts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal yeaz 1991/92 for the maintenance and operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Safd maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subJect area) in connection wlih sold districts. L9cation of Work. SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of-way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particulazly described on maps which aze on tale >n the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Description of As¢e m nt DI Ms SECTION 3• That the contemplated work, >n the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Counctl hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said districts, aze assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts aze described as follows: within the rexterlo boundary llnee shown upon~thatocCertalr[ "Mrap of Street Lighting Maintenance Dlstrlc! No. 1", "Map of Street bighting Maintenance District No. 2", "futap of Street Ltghting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Llghtlng Maintenance Dfetrict No. 4", "Map of Street Llghtlng Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Street Ughting Maintenance Disbict No. 7", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8", indfcating by said boundary Iinea the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps aze on Ste in the Offlce of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said nu[ps for furWer, full and more --'-- ' '~ uco~,ai uuaa w riaUd assesamen[ tllah'1Cta, and ti1E said map8 80 OR ~le shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment dlatrlets. Report of En n r ~ .~~ SECTION 4: The Ctty Council of said City by Resolutlon No.pl has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the dfstrict boundartes, assessment woes, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file lr[ the Office of the Ctty Clerk of said City. Reference to said report Ls hereby made for all particulate for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 3rd day of July, 1991, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Clty Council Chambers in the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carved out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for fiscal year 1991/92. Protests must be !n writing and must contain a description of the property !n which each signer thereof 1s interested, su[flclent to tdentlfy the same, and must be delivered to Uie Ctty Clerk of sold Clty prior to the time set for the hearing, and no other protests or obJections will be considered. It the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll such protest must contain or be accompanied by written evidence that such signer Is the owner o[ the property so described. I andscapin¢ and Lt ng A_,* f 1972 SRC?'!ON 6• All the work here/n proposed shall be done and carried through >n pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of Californta designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, befog Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Callfomfa. 3F,Cl'lON 7: Published nonce shall be made pursuant to Sectlon X61 of the Gwemment Code, the Me<yor shall Ngn this Reeolutbn and ffie City Clerk shall attest to fhe same. and the Ctty Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date xt for the hearing, at least once in the Inland Va a newspaper at general ctrculatlon published 1n the Ctty o Ontario, California, and circulated 1n the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga. Califonua. ~"- J.J I~BOLUTION ~(-/.5~. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAfdONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 WHEREAS, the Clty Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Iandacaac and LI¢htin¢ Act of 1A72. thr C,Yty Engineer Is required to make and Ale with the City Clerk of the Clty an annual report in writing for which assessments aze to be levied and collected to pay the costa of the maintenance and/or Improvement of said Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the C1ty Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said city a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Countllfor conalderaAon; and WHEREAS, said Councll has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and Ands that each and every part of said report Is sufficient and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified rn any respect. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: I. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them aze hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment Districts referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Dish7ets aze hereby prelimtnarlly approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land 1n said Assessment DiaMCts in proportion to the esAmated 3eneflt to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from sold work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the Ascal year 1991/92 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings. ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAIIYTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR 1991 /92 Crl'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL DISIRICI'S ADM[NIS'IRATION APPROVED: WM. JOE O'NEIL. CiIY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamon~ Street L~~ EnglneeCs Report ghttng Maintenance District No. 1 Arterial 3treeta Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92 The annual report for Street [.tghting Maintenance Dfatrlct No. 1 (Arterial Streets) Is prepared !n compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1. Division 5 of the Sheets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and [lgtrting Act of 1972). Thta report deals w1W the protected expenditures for flacal year 1991/92 to determine annual assessments, The assessment wID be used to furnish services and mattrlals for the ordinary and usual maintenance ee provided by Southern California Edieon Company. Mamtenance !a considered of general benefltto all areas to the District and costa shall be divided as mdlcated to the body of this report. Detailed maintenance acUvlUea Include the repair, remova- or replacement of all or any part o[ any improvement providing for llluminaUon of the subJect azea. Stree[ lights were constructed and Installed by the developers of We individual subdivisions. The plane and street ltghts are as stipulated In Ure conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Dtvlaton. Fiscal Year 1991/92 Projected Expenditures Assessment AdmWStratlon S 75,8(15 Electric $ 92.586 Overhead $ 15,338 Maintenance/Operatlotls 8 30.000 $21s,7o9 less: interest (8.4996 of Asamt. Rev. Req'd. for 1/2 year) <$8,892> Less: Penaltles (.25% of Assmt. Rev. Req'd.) <8511> Asamt. Rev. Req'd. $203,506 After re~~tew of the current expenditures, projected revenues and increase in utility coats, 1t was determined that the assessment rate for Street [rgl,ting Maintenance I)lstrlct No. 1 should be increased from $9.25 to $10.18 per assessment unit for Fiscal Year 1991/92. Projected Revenue 20,289 A.U. x $10.18 = $204,506 A projected $102,253 carryover from Fiscal Year 1990/91 will be used to fund this district for the first half of Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92 until assessments aze received in January, 1992. During Ascal year 1991/92 the following tracts and lights were annexed Into Street ltghting Maintenance District No. 1: TRACT Member 1. 1982 12045 1988 t be 7 S 9 A.U. PM ••••••"•,•• en em r . 11222 i i i9e6 57 A.U. TRACT ~uicw ie~ . 12969 26 A.U. ANNEXED September 7. 1988 TRACT AN 13825 1988 t b 21 S 6 A.U. NEXED TRACT en em er . 13248 1988 b 16 N 60 A.U. ANNEXED TRACT ovem er . X 3367 19 A.U. ANNEXED Januaxv 4. 1989 MDR 88-19 i15 1989 19A.L'. ANNEXED TRACT QDr . 13823 6 1989 b 5 A.U. ANNEXED CUP . Sentem er 87-05 10 A.U. ANNEXED September 20. 19$9 MDR 89-07 N b 198 7.64 A.U. ~2¢,Q TRACT ovem er 1. 9 13930 23 A.U. A TRACT January 9. 1990 13821 b 1990 7 7 AU. DR pg n~arv . 88-19 7 1990 b 12.08 ALT. TRACT ruaz^ . Fe 13886 i n 23 AU. Givivni~u TRACT n._a ^tt. iws_x_ re 13664-1 28 AU. 13664 99 p TRACE Mazch 7. 1 0 13890-1 91 AU. 13890-2 h 2 1990 PM Marc 1. 12848 1990 h 13.32 AU. gj2 TRACT A*T*TG~'^ Mazc 21. 13738 tl 4 990 18 AU. TRACT apr . 1 11428 14 AU. ANPTEXED Ayri14. 1990 TRACE 13898 14 1990 7 AU. ;~~]2 CUP . Anri 88-38 i 17 AU. PM ANNEXED 18. 1990 Aorl 11410 A0r1118. 1990 22.2 AU. CUP 88-37 .7 AU. A TRACT ~y 18. 1990 13565 16 1990 30 A.U. TRACT X . 13565-5 16 1990 38 A.U. Amp TRACT ~v . 13565-6 ii io nv 38 A.U. TRACT gyw( . a 13565-7 I6 1990 44 A.U. gip TRACT ANNF . ~v 13565-8 16 1990 43 A.U. . .D TRACT ~v . 13565-9 M 29 94• 40 A.U. g TRACT ~. . 1 13316 123 A.L'. ANNEXED Ju]y 18. 1990 CUP X 89-17 1 990 4.84 A.U. ED ANNE PM A F~' n All~ust . 1 12263 5 b 1990 26.82 A.U. NN L PM . ~ntem er 11286 22.89 A.U. ANNEXED September 5. 1990 PM 12596 t be 5 1990 19.04 A.U. ,Q PM em . ~p r 12781 19.14 A.U. CUP Sentember 5. 1990 88-46 b 19 1990 S 7 AU. TRACT er . eptem 13812 4 1 O 153 AU. A CUP o r - 88-18 2.48 AU. PM 12854 b 7 990 1 AU. PM Novem er . 1 11473 1 9A 7 8 AU. PM ~ ~ . N movg der 11940 7 1 9 5.92 AU. x,12 PM . November 9 0 13125 19.2 AU. ANNEXED Dscember 5. 1990 TRACT 13303 96 A.U. 13303- I 13303-2 ANNEXED December 19. 1990 PM 12338 b O 1 1 27.56 AU. DR rumv Fe - 89-21 5 AU. GTY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNG~`.( , ASSESSMENT DIr.GRAM Il ` STREET LIGHTWG MAWTENANCE OIS~ICT N0. 3 CITY Of RANCHO CUG:: ~NGA CWNT7 OF ShV aERN4:nO1N0 STATE CF CPr_IFORNI4 7~ii 1 II ..... __. - ~_. _ ~ i r,=C' N0. !2045 `HT I~ ~< ® ~SbcEEMENT ~b1~~RAM LANDSCfiaE hAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 L "--- I J ~ ~ d -,,~~. ,,r- . ,. ~. ` '~ ti _`---- iiii ~~i r . p ! uw• :~ --- ~. . ' ~ _~ 'LI -- l q .m. PARCEL 1 g L ~ ~cI ~1 11 iiN ~" .o.. I -..•R.~ PARCEL b ~I ~~4~5 ~.~i"~'`^., _ CITY 09 RANCHO CUCAIROIiGA ~ P M ~_; ~:~\ _ COUNTY OF 8AN RE8NA8DIId0 .; • 8PAT8 OF CALIFORNIA _ ~~~ - - I - • EXH I9IT "A" / ~. SESSMEAIT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DI57RICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE D15TRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 wuo~ ^oura 4 !/ y ~ ___ ~ Y i • __ - , a '{. Y ~ 7 i W a is H1 • r a ~ i ___ a ~ e __`= n ti R 1 i ~ ri ~ I e a '' Y5 _ _ r _, n 10 w F ! ~ { -_p ie ~ M a ~s` r -_ • L n ~ i i ' ~___ a -. ~l ~ ~ M V ~Y ! 1 ~ /1 --- '1 ~ '.. P K a ^ -Z~.AT®a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 u ~. Y~9ti A9Sr:7Y1~ r M I ~ err [.o~~r _ ~ -l a ~ ~ L~~/G::~. ' ~31~T-)ii y~ ' R11iS.R'1L~ ~'i"~?'~~ '~ ~4 ~lwrr. - -,~.. ~ . .rwr S'~i~.M - C1TY 08 RANtCSO CUCA~[OP1G/- =~~,~~ COUNTY OF BAPi H~NARDII~10 L' sraT~ OF cat.>FOarlr~- N -'~.` ,o;, wssess~r~~~~c ~- ~-NG~a~~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NQ. t (1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~_ ~~ - -;%------.~._ ---------~-----~-'rte- P"".!! +Ai 3.UA ~ ~ r + _- • r i y~y CS •• ', 1 j 1 ' r y ~ Z ' THPC~ ~' U3~p i M! i ZT. PAGii 12) - 30 ~~ ~~ ~P 54 "~~ CITY OF BAriCHO CQCAYONOA ~`,~-~~' COIJN'PY OF 8AN B~NARDII~IO `~~ ~TAT~ OF CALII+'O1tNIA '0 3 im~~ -~ N R~3ES~MENTTDIAGRRM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 «~ s•~~~~ ~'--:~~= ~: ~`~ s bk~ ~m - rn.. _ wY.W.uI .w.. ' !; }+ ~ 4Y.~a= 3 LU 1 A j w.. rWmY '~y ~ ~ . J„yq~~M.0.nM /Q . v r 2~ Nt 1 .i"~i ra.na 1 vY. +a . . ""' + s i .,~ ~ .,.ray. • • ~ . ~M1A~.a.v ~ ~ .M ~ ~ yy~~ 1W .~ rr.. 3 ~',; ,, LOT 'A ~ . i ' 6II r a ~W =w ~ ~ 7 . . . ~ .f~ A» ~ u. . o~ p~ /6 ~ ti/ ! { 7 Mu. Ga Y..~ a e 11C yyyy~ e. ! rl ,....,~...~,~«~. sm S + a m . .v r..p I p S ~ ` r y,~ ~ HI GH ANp gyE!l~iF q °w ~ P~ ~~ ~.~w ~~ ~'l ciTY of ~+NCao cvcAacoxas COUNTY OF BAPI B~NAIiDINO ~ e ,.I N r~ A~SSMENT DIAGI~A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET SIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 BR~Kt=~~R i~ ~~ I~I - - - - ~ L MWD RC.W. _ Y4 ~ I ~ T'--I HIGHWdD .~'v~NUG 9~~~ ' ,~,:, crrY os aAric$o Cvor-aioxae sy ," COUNTY OP BdLAI B>OZxABDII~10 ~= ~: ' BTAT$ OF CALIIrORMA ~T ~_ ~4SSESSMENT Dt/riFiAMI LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DiSTRiCT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 _ ---~-~~ ,foothil blvd. - - _ - - - ~ ~ _ _ m ~ e t~~ Y~~ s~ `e location -~ /o955ARA~w~~- arrew reuic~ _ ~ ,QGrCA• 9/730 ~ I ~Tm u > ~( ~ lsraev st. o ad S I spj~' CITT O~ SAPiC~O CiTCANONGA : ~~~ COZJNIR OF 8AN BI~PtARDII~t0 ~- _; ; sraTa Oa c~osrrzA N x~yy , :. AS8E8~~M ~ N 0f~1G1~AiN I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 f-y T 1 It ..V ~. ~1 ~ ~~y i ~,. ~d ~~'~ Carl i~" t~ _.~~~I ~ ~~ ~=~ ~ 14~``-. q] ~~i~ i ~~ ~~~ t~ ~:~ ~I ~" _; Gi c '-~.~ a' c ~ 1 I ~ III I ! F ' NI(3QilID AYQi1E ! `~: :: L~ 3 Cl'P! 0~ BANC80 CQCA1[0NdA COtJPITY Oy BAAI ~NASDII'i0 eras o~ cata~oarrL- 1'~T r L~UVU.ti.cr/ ;;.ir :i• '- EYNr1T •A• ~ ASSIaSSME1~IT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE D18TRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 . E ( N/NTM lTRf{7 a.q N H. WI i /~ t/YYO i/111iT- N~Y1i ...~ ~~... 'il ® fMQt ni0 NLKtl 1 i i1YtT IYi T111 1 ~ ' i i i ---- s• sun . ; ._. ~ IYICfL 1 r ~ x ~ a `~' %4 aa/ I i --- ~~ .~ ~ ~~ CITY OF RANCSiO CUCAMONGA ' COIDN4Y OF SAN BERNARDIN® MDF~ff7-D7 STA4~0~ CALIRORNIA MWIN itllQf I '~i 4 i aw+ wwrar rw i w ~ u ~. * e.Kwsrr •~• y ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM . LANDSCAPE MAMTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 g~ ~ ~ CITY GR RAIifC?I© CSJCAMONGA ~' C~IINTY GR SAN dERNARDINO - ~~ ~ STATE OF CAI.~ORNIA TB~.: ~33Q_ A;,raESSN1EA1Ti DIAGRI.sIA •. ' • LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, i STRE>TT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 2 - •~ I I l ~ ALIAOIID STREET W ' ~ W W C W I,; Q > ~ W ~ m ¢ ___ _ ; v i z ~ = • ~ _ HILLSIDE ROAD F ~ .. T s ' t- ~, ~:•.. .. ., ;:~,WIISON= AVENUE-'. ., _ .,.. C14Y OF RANC~10 CLICAMONGA ~' COUN4Y OF SAN @SRNARDINO TR 13io~ l STA4E O~ CALIFOES6'~IA YY~iIr1~V vYYYr•uV 1. W~a^. ~.. _. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO5. ~ r.,~.::: s/TE ~~ ~ w~ti 9.Y~tl Iyrr ••~Nrb . • wm ~ ~ vm .~~ ^ Y11r Y+~ e I a ~, ~ ' i y~iY r ~ tLe ~~, +~*,,'air.'~ 1' .+'r ~.'. ~, ups ~ 7 \~ Cl4Y C~ RAa8C~8C CZBCA~A®NGA C®19N7'Y CI: SAN BERNARDINO 8 ~/ ST6iaE Q-~ CALI~aRN1A ~~ exwerc •~. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET tIC~1iTiNG MAINT@NANC€ Oi8TA1CT NOS. 1 AND 3 LOT 1 LOT 2 TRACT d0• 10! W 7 Y W B d O 2 6 F W BASE LINE Z ROAD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .... COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ! STATE OP CALIFORNIA ~yZZIl3~F Tit /388b ~, ~ / vR1V ATE DRIVE ~` exweir •,-• ASSESSMENT DiAORAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTINf~MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ~1' ," i r } ~ 9 1L 1l ', x •~ ~tlf~ \~ 1~ B ~ \~ /C r/i ~y ;~ ' i ~ ~~~ ~; / ~/ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~4 ;, f- CITY OF RANC190 CSICAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA i~r~%~%~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANaSCAPE iBAlNTENANCE Di.STRiCT NO. i STREET LlGHTWG MAWTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 2 1 <<a~ a~ 2 ~e 7 ~ If ~ 71 M S W 7 ~ .. V, • W p ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ N M 1n s z ~a x. ~ tr. w ` ~ n W a 11 W d M ~ ~ Ia ~ ~° ~ as n MAfiXLIA Dft. 1/16 114 I I7 I IO 110 I a0I al I ~ 9(F z ~ HIGHLAND AVC. CITY OR RANCNO CUCAMONOA COUNTY Ot< SAN eERNARpINO STATE OR CALN~ORNIA T~ 1390-) ~,,, ~. A~3ESSMENT DIARipA1i1 uNDSCApE IiU-INTENANCE DISTRICT NQ. s STREET LIGHTMIG AAAINTENANCE DISTRICT N08. 1 AND 2 • a ~~ ~ Y ~4 ~, ~~~b a /~~. .. ~ < .., v s ~ ~ a u i~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ m $ ¢ s ~° ae » sa i ~0 ~ ~ =s 2Y 9~z-3 COTY ~ RANC7~1p cslcnlrwNOA - . _ C~IONTY OF sAN OERNARWNO STA4'E Of CAI.IIeORN1A ~i_ 89o a /JCL r .rlosESSiw~ME7 QYra~~w~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET L!!"aI'!T!N!3 AAINTENANCE p3STRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~~~'~ i 1 ' ~ : ~ z! =I ; l i ' ~ ! . T Q: ;s-~ - ;•t i. ~. Z~ ~ LF.• ~. f~ i i i ~, ii ~ k 1, ° •~ i' ~~ ~~ 5/fE ~ /..., y _~~ ~~ tJISON-~J M rri~ ~ f--. -- < _ »x ---1=- , ~.. ... . ...._. ~1 2 '~. •-' ~ ..f. -' y it1 ~ ~ _.. Q # .~Y f~ .ter c] ~~•- .. I ~- ,. ~~ ELL C URT ~' ~~ ..fl._~ i t ......di° ~ ~ i _vs=j, yae ~ ~•. ,ti i i , . _i ~ y~ z ^ C14Y OF RAI~IC~10 CS~ICAl111®NGA C019NTY OG 5AC~1 BE~INARDINO J ~ 5i'A4~e ©D: Ci-LIFORNIA pM ~2g_ -~ j EXIYlIT •~• .~~SESSMENT DIADR'.".SM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~ ~-~~ ~'~ ~~/~"~ L .i~ •~ ~' ~, C1 ~{ Z ~5 //iceI ~ ~ ~ ~i i; I'. ~,I I I -- I CITY OF RANCHO CslCAMON~iA COtlNTY OR SAN BERNARDINO ~- STATE OAF CALIFORNIA T`e X3738 ~ exwe~T •~• ASSESSMEI~IT DIARiRAM LANDSCA~ ~fA1NTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 ~ STRE6T LICNTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 /- ~~TE - - I 1 •1. •• ~'I, ~, ~ L.., ~, '• ~ _ ~ ~I ~ :. _ I'~j ~ t,; ~~ ~~ ~•~~,rr Z . i R -ti..~... ' 7 ~~. 1 V ~rr~~ ~ g, i!. wear... , , R~~`JI1,../~ . ~. , ! ~ti • ~ .~ % i ~ ~. ~ '.,~ _ i <Z~ ~~ C74Y Ole RANCHO CSJCAMONOA .. COlIN41f OF SAN BEANAR®INO S4A4E OF CALIFORNIA Z~ //,Q2: ~~C9 . ExNUe~r •,L• • ASSESSMEalT D4Al3RAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ' STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 2 '. EGENO ~ OENOTL! UN05 CA~f 1RC• DEMO TL4 !10l M~lx OENOT[! 3TNlLT L16 NT © OCNOTL! TN[[! •Li.L1,.IT I [7, I I ~ I SI N S N e ~ ~ Ni~i]CV] CT A a n ~ 0 ~ 3 f a J CT~NLS] LT I ~LNON I ~~ / CITY CF RANCIIC CIlCAM®N~A CDtdNTY CF SAN BERNARDINO TR 13898 STQ1~E ~F CALIFORNIA J.~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCg DISTRICT NO. 3 STRE=T LIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTgICT NO$. 1 AND B /J'~TA yL~ 4,rn/e 9TTlIY -T .~ 1 i n 61'1 O a-i Naa wwM aTafai u~w o--(7 iaa wwh siN~T usui Q rNe. i>'E .a w+ao ruw iLKeaT: re~e rvr•t~ JyL qY+! /TNtT. RJTINI! Jcltlff l.,J. N1V\fl ~VfFU/ YYFOLU 4faYOIPWfA. MAJf9i U: fflYTT W t W Y x ~Z ~ L n^~i n }~... 3 C34'Y mR Rl~fald~BO C~9CAN~Nt3A C~UNTIf ~DtF SAW BR3tNAR®tN~ GrtA ~~-~ saa~~ ~ ca~.~F~RN~~- i CITY OF RANC~10 CUCAMONGA COC~NTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PM 1.14-10 :. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Al~SESSMENT DIAGR/~IA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STRUT LiGN7'ING MAINT@NANG~ DiSTFiNCT Nl7S. 1 AND 8 A~SESSMEAI4 DiAGFt~1M LANDSCAPE MAMTENANCE DI8TAICT NO. 3 STREET LI~iMTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 W z Q 0 z 3 w SITE ._ . . 1, ~ 1 ~~~. ~~ ~qP MILLER AVENUE ~j~z / o ~- CIaY ml~ lIANC~IC ClJCAM®N®A CCI,LN?Y CF SAN BE3;NAEIDIN® ~cuP 8$-~ saa-a~ m~ cAa.IF~RNI E%N181T 'p• Resaluti on No. 30-711 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Page 7 r~""lr ' ~ ~~ ~' ~'/ ~ i i ~ II, n i ~. ~ i u u i COIJN7Y OF SAN BEpNAWDINO TR 13565 S7A7E OF CALIFORNIA -_S ~-h~r,~'~ Ci4Y OF WANCNO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM IP.MDSCAPE !~1A lti TcivilNCc 6(BTP.lCT NU. 7 .,~Z~; 4 5 ~ ZO 7 Y;P H 1 3/ H yt ~ I, ~ /o ~G?~ I ol; \ r 3o A1~ i_ ~ s 71 ' 3~ Z~ I~f 3T ~ I }~ ~ 28 r ~ 3G I ~S I 27 I S~°37 -~~ ~~~ GTV MAWTAINED LANDSCAPE AREA TREE MAINTENANCE •~~~• EOUESTflAIN Tq AIL MAINTENANCE TRACT 13565 PHASE 5 ~,.~" "`I':r, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~/ ~ /~ 1= ~' ; n VI I> ~: ~ t~ ~ic~z ~~- Ian ,7~ ~, , ~`";~ z /7 ¢ /B E /7 ~ /G y /~ E a /¢ ~_ /~ t is fe /2 // AA Lt[!t~ A 'EXHIBIT A' N ASSESSMENT DIAGRAfvI "q nlt„~gCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 ~~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1~,N6SCi.PE MtiiNTENA!vCE DISTRICT NC. 7 CITY MAINTAINED IAN~SCAPE AgEA TPEE MANTENANCE EOOESTgALN TPAIL MAINTENANCE U I ~t~ 'EXHIBIT A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 CITY MAW 7AWED LANDSCAPE AREA THEE MAWTENANCE EDUESinAW iflA1 MAINTENANCE i II~G~ 'EXHIBIT A' -( ASSESSMENT DIAGRAIVi L,4 C:DSCAPF MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 1 ~s~~ CITY MAWTAWED lAM)SSCAPE AREA ~~ TREE MAWTENANCE •~~~~• EDDESTRAW 7RA0. MAWTENANCE TRACT 13565 PHASE 9 Dcf "~I~.t~y CITY OF RAIICHO CUCAMOIQGA x~/ ~ ~>_ c: 4~' fr,/ is ~ r ,y.lry ~~ ~ l~ ~~ ~ iz vi [> ~9n [illt~ A 'EXHIBIT A' _~~ N ASSESSMENT .A. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 / "1 I PAlt~EL 2 ~6GGAL DEOGRIITION /~\I` N~ ,~-ND~'~e'oc•w yo.oo' ~ i ry I io / 4' C y (OV~ryo (~~ ry I ~ I ~b !o - - ten• ~ f ~-----1 ,~,y ~ I n i 'V ~ 00'll X04 E 2~4.D1 ((N~ ~a ~ 4L \ I M z ~~o.ao' ~ i pRGtL I ~DV FiK~ou)' ----~ ?f.oo' ~ N e1-De'ii' 9'J1.e'z lv N 61-DO'LL'S 9L43' - POH~ - ---r-r--r- ---T- i ~'~MOM~ strip r-~o~----- 1 ~ .3~ i jd j7 Df. j '~7 ~ :h i 33 11 h ICI I ~ ~,- '---'1 Q ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ PR(jPOS>~ S~BC/t~YS/C,1ry ~ I ~ ~ v~ ~ I i THAC~ N0. /33/61 I I I ~ - - . - - ~l-L- -~-L.-L_L-J ~I ~ ~ 9~ Z i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~' COUNTY OF SAN EERNARDINO ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 133/0 `'~ E%M161T 'q• A ~ESSMENT DIAGRs. A LANDSCAP€ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 j :. 1~ .. - `~~ - -inn •__ ~ ' ,.. z /~ ~I.. ~, r~ '---- ._~.-, _. ~,_. < '. .'} CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO -'~; - L i33/b STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~ A~'StE~SM~~IT DIAGAnM LANDSCAPE IYlAINTE~lANCE DISTRICT NQ. 3 , STREa"T LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Nf35. i AND 6 z~ oa ~ ., .z .~ > Q o o _ ~~°, -- - ~ ,~ y .c..i _. O r Y 0 0 ~ a F ~ ? I W ? -- ~ ~ -- ~. < __ _ i' e; I . 'f 1 1V l 1 _ p `~~ ~~. ~1 ~ :5.00 n( 0i '- ~ ~ 5 ~o r/Z ~~, .. .:..:.M.:....+e~:••s ~ ~9tn STnEET I 9ta z l~ cszY m~ ~a~ec~a© c~ca-M®N~- C~I~N?'3f GfF SdQr1 BE34NAW®tii0 ~-., _~ CUP 89-i? ~~,~.. # STi'~~ ~ C~ GALlF~FtO~lli1 ex~nsrc •~• , ASSESSMENT DIA~iRAM STREET LfGMTING MAONTENANCE DiSTRiCT NOS. i ANC 3 ~~~ Vs,~ _ _ .~ l lj ~ .rm~,~, 3'.^ l ~}ry I'~ 8 ::~ ~ I„~' .-.i '.OL I~ gr. R1Q'CL __ ~ y~ a :` ~5~'e c~ o Irna.a -_ -._ ~ •I~ ~_~ q~tyt ~ __ -' iii ~~~ ~ ~9R ~~ ~y 9 :' i =~ --)^ '~~ - - ~ ~~ tea, _ _. v/:'~ V proroezz h~~ , ~ ~.i~ \L ~ ~` Q~ z /~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .., COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF~CALIFORNIA ' i ~ /wW!h .ChYmf~j k'b ~AcQ ,,,» Pa~CC ~ A ~?d w' / 1F' }}}/ -- ~ /M.~![ 4 Rvacez ~~ AfC~L / , 6 ex~r a• ASSSS:~aC~iE~iT DIA6iiAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 r ~i~z~o C!i'Y OF iiANC7~0 CiJCAMONGA COtDN4Y ©~ SAN BENNARDINO r - /l~?8~0 57'c:-u s OF CALIFOWNIA ASSESSMENT DIAG~-M LRNDSCARE MAINTENANCE DlSTRDCT NO. ~ STREET LIGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 9~ Z ~--/ COTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PM 1596 ~ASSESSMEI~IT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTAECT NO. 3 STREET LIOMTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 G O D 2 ..,., _._~ r ji ill O m -_ .~~' '~.. a wa? ..::- e+ _ .. '~. G I r .,.;•.: -~- •-- _ I i~~:-- ~~ ... ~ 4 ` i Rbida ~ . [ y ..: x61: ~..... n i~.~n ^. r.:r as s.~~.~ r .. Z ~3~- CITY OF RAPlC~80 CSlCAMONGA COUNTY O~ SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~ 781 ~ Elfltl0lT •A• • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 1-ANDSCARE IMAiNTENANGE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 018TRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~~ BASELINE AVE _ _ . _ w \__ rx:tr Sl:rvfLx L_T\ilrlx! Cf0 ~ __ _ ___ /(YIfT. llttxlln \ T ^i n - "~ --r-----_~--- - 1 ' _ _ ____ ~ - - ~ ~ lI ~ I S tJ ~\ • ` \ I ~ I ~ I I e ~ , (YIlT. GO I I I 1 I ~ LS ,.• Q PAACc_ I ~ ~ P4AG.L .I ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ I 1~ ~~ [}Ili. l.C~ h~S~ ~,~ ~C__ I Al x i i i~iJAP 53.;'5 ~ ~'= - { ~ P)A.n 83 II I PGS. 34 3 35 ~ y I lo I o j ' I~ ! I I ~~ I ~[xun rnr[s~ j ~ Maur Mttl ~ 1 • • ~~ ~ .~ nl!• nff• 1!'!! 1!'l!•C yy z ~3 ^ COTY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA ... COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~~~ 3 exwar •~• As~-ESSONENT o~A~R~ ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTFI{CT NC. T STREI=T MAWTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 7 W~.I W rtiY ~•O• r YPORYr, .~~e~N M••/•~3MU w•~r w, 4. MiY f,Yru ~ r. ~~..>.K..,r.~3 ~»L v» " `:.•.`•°:••v inn .. +......r sua,ra e., ~• a3w:. wiK is Y{.ww.... mw ~ i. xr i u ^ ~ .. .' - w...i~ti v, i~ I i i• •' I 9t zi I i ,_ , ~ ' I ~_~ {'e a ,~ ~I I I : l ~ ~ <~ 0 ~ z. .l l i 1 z i: a . , - . , i it E ;.~~ I I ~ y ^ d i • I 1~ i I P s i ' h`c~ ~~ I I ~ „ ~ 3j ~ ;L N~ ii `~ yi' ~v i\` y ~~t f ~ .ro .rtw[ •'~~`\ ISe..3 y4~.u 301 :O •wa wnrlon ~T-1 •a+, yin II. ai,~y N7w~ou O'•\/ ~~ V Oi~ CITY OR RAC~IC~9O Ci~DCAMONGA COUNTY CI' SAN BERNARDINO STAif~ p~ CALIFaRNIA TR f3fj12 t~ -~ ,` c • n ~ ~ q 3 ~? ~, y L ~q ti• \ • 'j _'_~(~ \ r• P y 3 3.3., ,.rw ~ Y4.( ~n hMi•+Mi exwerc •,,~ ~ AaSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~„ ~ a 0 ~~ .,. ...o.. ~ .~ f ~II no ~n......,...1~ mC~TT'nv ~ ... ~........m ' ...,.~: j ~ .... : ....,, .. ,...... ~„ ... ~ •l „~, l y. = ` ~/C~ Z ~5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Q STATE OF CALIFORNIA - EXHIBIT •A• +ll,SSESSElfiE?a'n e~8A4".,RiBsE1f1 ,TREAT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 FORMATION I~ tOI d ~O O..I ~1 F N/CNLANO dVE4UE F_ _ -y - _ iE CATdLPd 579EET ..... _ .__-. ._ ra. a Fay. --_n I_ ._ =... ., r.r. vaa ..., er .e•.x~ I? ~. ' i __ _ - _ __ __ _ ~- _J -._._. - ' ( V/CTCR/Av STREET " ~r ~. .. ere.. , '- ~ - ~' _-~ I `~I Yl .;~:. I ` z i $ aCVSw:C1 4KL ~ j m t o . a. ' ~ i'. 9 '3 _ c U _ ~- Z W , V s rl F. I '~ ~' ' I ~ F ~V„ ~ ma ~ I F ~ F . g l W O ' ......... ~.. ~ i. ! rim ~`~/ - r_ CIYY OF FiANC7r10 CUCAMONGA COIDN4Y OF SAN BE9;NARDINO saa-a~ ©G CALIF®I~NIA PM 12ss4 9~ Z ~ h E7lMIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAiiRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 2 `Original Poor Quality ~..r, elf F ~- -- == =r - - ~ ~ NAM/LYON PI' STS ~- I r .•I ~ ' I W ~ Z s ~ ~ '~`~ ' •~~ ~ l i ~ _- - ~ ~ iI .1I~ TYII L.. LYX ~~ 4IiL QYYI ~ [\~o ~ J ' J /. x t t y /~' ~ 2 ~'~ iL- \ ? ~\ l O ~~.,...o... / I~ 1 O =„~~ ~ ~ 7,.~, ~ I -~ ~mw -~ ~. z ~- ~ CITY OF RANCaIO CUCAMONGA COUN'YY OF SAN BERNARDINO szATS of cA~~FORNIA M 11473 ~~ AS uNOs STREET LIGNTNiG J EX1401T •~• SESSMENT DIAGRAM CAPE 6AINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~Y z ~-~ CITY OF RANC~f® CZICAMONGA COl9NTY OF 5AN BERNARDINO 3 $TA4E `®F CALIFORNIA eM I I q4 0 rF/n CXIY0IT •q• ASSESSMENT' DipGRAM LANDSCAPE MAWTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGNTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 1 i~ ~~ • // PROJECT SITE ~i i/ m; /~ ~ -- ~~1 ~~ I;li y i ¢~ i~ ~z, y i, ~~ Z~% CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ' ~ STATE OF cwt tFORNtA GM i3ias lXMI~IT •A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ~~z 30 r- -~ CITY OF RANCI~IO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TR l ~ ~ ~T- STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ / ,,d J J Q1tNyT •A• ASSESSMENT p1AQRAM u-NDS ~eau+sr~ANCe DISTRiCr ~. s STREET LIGNTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 7 AND 8 9 z3I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAINON~iA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO S STATE~ OF CALlFORN~A pnxc~. naa 12338 h/~ 1 J axwar •w• ASSESSiYIENT DiA~GIRAt4f LANDSCAPE IAAWTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGIiTMIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 SITE SPRUCE AVF. ~ Q WHITE OAK AVE ~ 2 2 ~ Q I2 HWY. ~Z3~- U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (~R 59-21 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREET ANNUAL ENGIIVEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING EdAIIVTENADiCE DISTRICT NO. 2 aocal streets) FISCAL YEAR 19s 1 /s2 C11Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: WM. JOE O'NEIL, CICP ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Ughtuig Maintenance District No. 2 Local Streets Fiscal Year 1991/92 The annual report for Street Ltghttng Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) Ls prepared >n mmpllance with the requirement of Artlcle 4. Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). This report deals with the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1991/92 to determine annual assessments, The assessment wW be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance. operation, servicing and restoration of street light Improvements as provided by Southern California Edtson Company. Maintenance Is considered of general benefit to all areas within the District and mats shall be divided as Indicated In the body of this report. Detailed maintenance actlvltfea Include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement provldmg for dluminatton of the subject azea. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers of the individual subd[vlsions. The plans and street lights aze stipulated In the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. F1aca1 Year 1991/92 Protected Expenditures Assessment AdmlNstration $ 28,090 Electric $ 72,000 Overhead $ 8,348 Maintenance/Operations $ 9.871 $118,309 Less: interest (8.4896 of Assort. Rev. Req'd, for 1/2 year) c$4,730a Lela: Penalttea (.2596 of Assort. Rev. Req'd.) ~8279~ Assort. Rev. Req'd. $111,300 After review of the current expenditures, protected revenues and the increase in utility costs, it was determmed that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 will remain at >620.00 per assessment unit for Fiscal Year 1991/92. Protected Revenue 5.565 A.U. x $20,00 $111,300 A protected 7556,650 carryover Crom Fiscal Year 1990/91 will be used to fund this district for the first half of Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92 until assessments aze received >n January, 1992. Dnring (iaeal year 1991/92 the following developments and lights were annexed Into Street lighting Maintenance Dishict Nn. 2: gig TRACT ~ptember 7. 1988 12969 Sn tnm lORR 7 26 A.U. TRACT p . 1 13825 t h 21 1988 6A.U. p 772ACf $~p em er . 13248 80 A.U. gplfiEXED November 16. 1988 TRACC A n+=D ~ 13367 1989 i15 19 A.U. N[ ? TRACT Qpr . 13823 4A.U. ~~]2 TRACT' November 1. 1989 13930 23 A.U. ANNEXED November 1. 1989 PM ANNEXED 11685 J 3 1990 sau. TRACT anuary . 13621 b 7 1990 7 A.U. Q DR ruary . Fe 88-19 12.OBA.U. ANNEXED Mazch 7. 1990 TRACT 13890-1 91 A.U. TRACT 13890-2 0 i 4 Amp TRACT . 1 9p 13898 7 A.U. ems. TRACT' TRACT may. 21. 1990 13798 ~y 29. 1990 1$$iu 18 elU. 123 AU: E%HIBIT "T" p-~SESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 'Original Poor ~ual~ty A[[O~ [OUT[ ~" _ ., ~ ,. ~' ` ~~ ~e • •'~ J d i i 4 ___ 1/ Y' ` q V •. G_._L __y c a ___ ~ ~ e ~ a ~ ~ ~ I _ ~ ~ _ _ !T 4 1 1 f y__ i ~ T ~ j, I/ V ~! 0 ;f 35 i ? f 10 P J ~~ ~ 1 '~ ) I „ ' w t . . • n i ~ `n--- ' U /! ~ ~ A lI _ _ .tl ~ '. e d _ y Y M j r ~ ' I 0iw°: • ~ ~~=' a ... _ --ter--~ .~ f •3. ~ ~ \ .l \ ~ ua [ ~~ J au ~~~LLL ~e~ ri e 1 L='lr::z.~ ~~y. " rusav.,~ 3fTfeis''~~ ~~ ~. _. ~~Z 3g ~ ~.~i~` ; - C11R OF B1~IdCSO CUCASONGA ~:~~~ COUNTY OF BAPi B~PiARDII40 ~" ^ SPATN OP CAI.BI'ORN~A ~ T ~. 6 3 ly ~m~ ~- gSSESS~M~ N ®4AC~RAl1A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 i STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 2 ~~. waw ~vwuc ~ 1 :r.... ~' :~~- ~, s .~`~°'~' s/ ~: ~' e 3 ~~ ~ xiuaren nvea2 ~z 3~ crr~r of BArrcao cvcAUOrras COUNIT Of 8AP1 8~1iA$~IIiO 8TA'Pa OS CAL~'OEMA ~ T ,r;: asssssw~~h~ ~ _.~-G~lawo LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 '4riginaf_Poor duality '~I ~ - _ J ~~ __ ~1 ~~ ~ _ .u ~~w~~~ ~'~'fL byllF l11. 1 ~ ~ ! - ~~ ~ 3 ! '~__''i \ ~ ..J.... ,~.~~_ :r..~ y r ~~ 9yz ~o ~ I 4 r 1 ~C-- y a b o {' i . _ `y -FweU ~ 1) - 30 i S,~s~, . crr~ of aAxcao cocAnorraA :' . _; . COUNIR OF 8AN ~NASDII~10 ~: ~-~ 8PA'Pa OF CALIIrOliNId1 :.. ~ 3 -~~. N A~SSMENT OIAGi~I LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, t STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~KU>xN-rsu>` L MWD FIC.W. ~yzyl ~, s~0j ,_ :~= V `~ ~ CTl'7f OF RANCSO CUCAI[ONOA COLTNrY OF 8AN 888NABDII~10 ere of CAtnroaxiA N ~~ E%IYlIT •~• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 i STREET UGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Nd8. 1 AND 2 'Origins! Poor duality w~ i1(M G ~ \ ~~ B ' ~ ' • •O \) .~ l.~ ' \\ zoX~I f. ~ y~ z ~.~- CITY o~ RANCNO ~~ COUNTY OR SAN SERNAROINO • ~ STATE OF CALIRORNIA T~ ,~nl'~g4~n c - --- ~'-- E%MIMT .A. ~ r` ASSESSMENT QIARiRAIN _ - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 '~"y~ ~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~ A ~- S ~ ~ ~~00 _ ~ ~ O E ~ O i. ~ ~~ rx-: '~. '~ ti~ T EVC/J . - ~ ~C .„ y?P~ /~`_p~v ' O~~ '~, ~V~• 1 ~ ~~ - ~ L,-i ~. 9~ z~i _ CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMON{'>fA ~. _ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ PM 1185 ,,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA A;~3ESSBAENT DIAGR1s,A .: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NCS. 1 AND 2 .. .~~ I ( I __i ALMOIID STREET W _ ~ y=j W a z r H w o ~ C i f m _~_ N S S S - ~ t V = Q i }IILLSIDE ROAD -F . % .. ~.WIlSPN= AVENUE'' , -< .~ q~ z ~3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~' COUNTY OF SAN DERNARDINO Tk 13~a ~ STATE.~O,I,F CALIFOE3NIA _ /r"~ exwsn •.e STREET GH$T NG MArNTENANCE~p~TR1~CT NOS. 1 ANO 3 `©~iginal.Poor Quality i . Tl c1~Z~ CfTY OF RANCHO CUCAIyfONGA _ COUNTY OF gpy gERNARDINO STA'f'g OF CALIFORNIA S -~/ ~~ SSMENT DIAiQ11AM LA[S3SCAPE hAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i STREET UGNTQIl9 MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, 1 AND 2 1 <~~ s~ ~o 3 " ~ ~ Y al ~ W 7~ ~ ~. u , ` ~ » h T N ~{ Z• ~ M M q a ~ ~ ~ W ~ 11 W V ~ _ ~ li ~' ~O ~e ~ i! Is MAReCLU DR. ~. Is ~~ n ~ le ro m 21 ~ -. HIGHLAND ,AVC. COTY CR RAidC~IO CUCAMON~'iA ~' C~1~NTY ®~ !AN BEWNARDWO r ~ Tl~ 13$9a-I .~ $7'ATE OF CALIfORN1A 1 v, 9~ ~ ~~ .~.. _ .. A' 'ESSMENT DIAtiRA~il LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D18TRN;T NO. 1 STREET LIGH'i'MIG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t AND 2 ~ • q p v V ,4 ~. ~ ~k i~ ~ / _. 7`~ n a < a v w ~ u ,~ ~ ~ ~ as ~D ~ ~ b ~ t~ s oc aFt » ~ ~ ss i y ~ ~ u : ~ :~ ... ~j~/ z ~~ clT~r oR nANC~IO cucAMONCaA . colNi4Y ®tQ dAl1 dERNARDINO STATE of CALd<ORNIA '~~~~ /~- __ .. r i ~, . [xNwT •~• • ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ' STREET UGNTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 .~~. Li[C4 T1 1T ..,r;~T;nal Poor (duality, ~, ,o.. LEG ENO = OfNOTC3 1~N03 C~~! •A[• 06N0T[3 310[MLLN O[NOT[! [711[[7 LI6NT © oclloice T11[cs S a ~~ n I a 1 ~~ L [ YC4 4 II o I'\\\'I"`\\\ i l 4i~~iCW CT a I 1 1o II s 10 ~I ilk`. J C TIS[ii GL ~'~Z~~ CITY OF RANCi110 CUCAMON~iA . ~ COUNTY OF !AN BERNARDINO ~ ~ TR 13898 - _~ STATE. O,F CALIFORNIA I RYWUT •A• .~~SESSMENT DIAOiR"K~NI LANDSCAPE MAtl~6TENANCI: DISTRICT NO. ! STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 'Qrig~nal .Poor_~ual;ty ~- - ~. ~~ ~= ~~ '~ 1. .-;: ~~ ~~ Z ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OR SAN BERNARDINO 13738 STATE ~ CALIIQORNIA t XHIEI7 •q• ,~ ASSESSMENT DIAeiRAM -~. LANOSCAI~€ MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 *c STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 ANO 2 'Orig,nat hoar Qua',ty ~-i I a. w !. . ~ '~ 44 r.N eTlel'~~'w ~o.oo I I ~/ ~~ /~ I I v~ I vry °° ~ v~ h~ (~ ~ 4s Y _to qh _8+ ~ -- - -C l~• ~ t,~ ~ ~ ry^b 9 ~ 1~ '1.o N 00•LII'04'E L~4.D~~ \ I ~ `~/' i ~. i ` ~ M w am.oo rAFI ~ I (LeaAL 1t~.eL' pypFlrrlON~ ~'----~ b woe' Net-ne•tt tx.~x --- I ~ .~LA110 D S'~/7ff~' r-~ C r----- r '~ 3 ~ I , _ / ~ Ije ~j/Ix.l» ~3rls~lhlal Ix ~ 11i `~~ j I P POSE I I I ~`I--------i I R~' S~BD/VYS/C,Vi I I t~ I vt ~~~ _1-LTRA~NQ~33/L-L-L-~ ~~----- 1 R I ye / y`~z`~% IS i~ Iz I~ r,~ ~_ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TR 133/(0 ASSESSMENT DIA©R..~AI LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 ~QCi~illul.~"'00~ ~+•Ic7iirj/ -~ r~ I,=~ -a• ~'~Zso CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ - 1 K /33/6 n STATE OF CALIFORNIA U~ ANNUAL ENGINEER'8 REPORT STREET LIGHTING I~AIIYTENANCE DISTRICT NO. S (Victoria PLnaed Coavmunit~) FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 Cl7'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMPIIED BY: SPECIAL DIS7RIC15 ADMIMSIRA'IION APPROVED: WM. JOE O'M;IL, Cr1Y ENGINEER Cfty of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Lfghting Maintenance Diatdct No. 8 (Victoria Planned Communiky) Fiscal Year 1991/92 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) !s prepared in eompllance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 Of the Streets and Highways Code. State o[ Califomla (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). This report outlines the protected expenditures for fiscal year 1991 /92 to determine the necessary assessment rate. The assessments will be used to furnish services and materlala for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street light improvements as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance is considered to be of general benefit to all areas within the district and costs shall be divided as indicated In the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvements providing for the Illumination of the subtect area. Street fights were constructed and lnatalled by the developers for the individual subdivisions. The plans and street Lghts are as stipulated !n the conditions of approval for each development and ae approved by the Engineering Div(sion. Fleca: Yeaz 1981/92 Projected Expenditures Assessment AdmWatratfon Electric Overhead Maintenance/Operations Lcaa. uiiw cni (8.4996 of Asamt. Rev. Req'd. for 1/2 year) Less: Penalties (.2596 of Aasmt. Rev. Req'd.) Aasmt. Rev. Req'd. $ls,oos $56,256 $ 5.897 1.000 882,158 <>r3,341> < > $~s,szo After review of current expenditures, projected revenues and the Increase to utility costa, it was determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance Inatrict No. 3 wID remain at $20.00 per assessment unit for Fiscal Year 1991/92. Projected Revenue 3,931 A.U. x $20.00 $7$,620 A projected $39,310 carryover from Fiscal Yeaz 1990/91 wlll be used to fund this district for the first half of Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92 until assessments aze received in January, 1992. During Becal year 1991/92 the follorwlog protects wlt6ln the Vtctorla Planned Commudly were annexed Into Street L7ghting Maintenance Dlstrlct No. S: AI2 Aumrat 1. 1990 PM 12268 28.82 AU. EXIIISIT •A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET UCaHTt-iG MAINTEtOANCr= CiNTRlCT NOS. 1 ANG 3 ~Ongmal Poor t~ual;tjr ~ t0!Q'FMl ANN RrIN/~fOC~6~~11~ ~ /~ YIiM. //N/MJOW ~ •t<.nN Y.lv .. 1. ~, tir•m''S~"a,,.ee,~ _~ ~_ ., :..d.r. _.2r~ ~i7T p IIf 2~T 'O1~ .. .. ... `/T'i~j~'~. I{yy1 2 # '_;~ • IW ~ ~ f10rCet L ~ Avg'6L 2 ice! [$I~ ' g ~ ? ~ ..; ~. ~J __ r ~L 4 Ttacr[ I ~ ~ ;S ~Y ~ R1MClZ "~ Lv ~~ F ~ 6 II7RCCr _... _ =' ~ $ 2 /pRCPL /'1~L Y' M ~~ ~ 4 / K6M~~y _ -.-;zr-; n:c~-----:tea + e < .... '3 d //p .... ~ ~. e. nw~e w: ue+f 5 4 nr'~ ~~Me _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~~~a . ~c/z5s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF!CALIFORNIA D. m. ~aa +~ 1 ~9 ANNUAL ENGIIVEER'8 REPORT STREET LIGSTINO MAI2YTENADiCE DffiTRICT NO. 4 (Tern Vista Planned Commnait~) FISCAL YEAR 1991 /92 CTiX OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL DISTRIC75 ADMllVISTRATlON APPROVED: WM. JOE O'NEIL, CLIY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamon~ Annual Engineer's Report Street iightfng Maintenance District No. 4 Terra Vlata Planned Communty Fiscal Year 1991/92 The annual report for Street lighting M8lntetlBnCe D18trtct No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1. Otvtsbn 5 of the Streets and Highways Code. State of Califonda (I.andacaping and Lghttng Act of 1972). This report deals w1W the projected expenditures for flscal year 1991/92 to determine the annual assessment rate. 1be asseasmenta wN be used to furnish services and matertals for the ordinary and usual matntenance, operation, servicing and restoration of street tight improvements as provided by Southern California Edtaon Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas >n the District and costs shall be divided as indtcated in the body of this report. Detailed matntenance activities Include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subJect area. Street fights were constructed by the developers for the individual scbdivlsions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated In the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1891/92 Projected Expenditures Assessment AdmWStratlon Electric Overhead Maintenance /Operations Less: interest (8.4996 of Assort. Rev. Req'd. [or 1 /2 year) Less: Penaldea (.2596 of Assort. Rev. Req'dJ Assort. Rev. Req'd. ffi 8,920 $50,000 $ 5,221 $ 8"612 $72, 753 <$2,859> <8174> $69,620 Alter review of current expenditures. protected revenues and the Increase In ut111ty costs, It was determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance Dlatrlet No. 4 will remain at $20.00 per assessment umt for Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92. Protected Revenue 3,481 A.U. x $20.00 $69,620 A protected $34,810 carryover from Fiscal Year 1990/91 wtll he used to fund this district for the first half of Fiscal Year 1991/92 untll assessments aze received >n January, 1992. Street Lilhting Maintenance District No. 4 experienced normal and routine expew ltures during the current fiscal year. During flacal year 1991/92 the fallowing pro)ecta were annexed W thfe district: TRACT 13664 24 A.U. A February 21. 1990 TRACT 13664-1 2 A.U. Stntember 5. 1990 PM 11286 22.89 A.U. XE)2 December 5. 1990 TRACT 13303 96 A.U. 13303-1 13303-2 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. e STREET LIGH7~i,MAMITENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 J/• ''? ~ s r e :s t~ ~ a. "~~~~ ~.~ , ~• i~ `~ -~~ ~ ~'~ ~~ ,; , 'O 0~,1 ~~ ~d ~r ,. p . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~%x ``-~ ~~~ ~~ Z~~ s ! ~. a ~ 'A• ASSESSAAEI+IT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE IYIAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 STREET LN3HTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 '4ng nai i_Poor Quafity- ~'~ ~~ i Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY' OF SAN BERNARDINO /ias~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA r EXWMT 'A• 4" ASSESSMENT DIARiRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DiSTAlCT Nl,~. 4 STREET LIGHTgr(; MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ANNUAL ENGINEER'8 REPORT STREET LIGHTING IIAIIVTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (Caren PLnned Community) FISCAL YEAR 1991 /92 CT1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMPITED BY: SPECIAL DiSTRICTB ADMINISTRATION APPROVED WM. JOE O'NEIL. C1TY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucammiga Annual Engtnar's Report Street lighting Maintenance District No. 6 Caryn Planned Community Fiscal Year 1991/92 The annual report for Street lighting Maintenance DisMct No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is grepared to compliance with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1. Division 5 of the Sheets and Highways Code, State of California (landscaping and lighting Act of 1972). Thta report deals with the projected acpenditutes for fiscal year 1991/92 to determine the annual assessment rate. the assessments will be used to furnish services and mattrials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, servicing and reetoratfon of street light tmprovemcnts as provided by Southern Caltfornla Edison Company. Maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas within the district and costa shall be dtvlded as indicated 1n the body of this report. Detatled maintenance activttles include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for ffiunUnation of the subject azea. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers [or the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated !n the condtuons of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Dlvisfon. Flsrel Year 1981/92 Projected Expenditures Assessment AdmtnlatraUon $ 5,850 ElecMc $15.000 Overhead $ 1,755 Maintenance/Operations jE 1.a48 $24,458 Less: Interest (8.49% of Assmt. Rev. Req'd. far 1/2 year) e$994> Leas: Penalties (.2596 of Asamt. Rev. Req'dJ <359> Assmt. Rev. Req'd. $25,400 After review of current expenditures, projected revenues and the Increase In utlllty coats. !t was determined that We assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 wdl remain at $20.00 per assessment unit for F/seal Year 1991/92. Protected Revenue 1,170 A.U. x $20.00 = $23,400 A protected $11,700 carryover from Fiscal Year 1990/91 will be used to fund this district for the drat half of Fiscal Year 1991/92 untll assessments aze received >n January. 1992. ANNUAL ENGII~EER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING IIAIINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (Commerciai/Iadust*I W FISCAL YEAR 1991 /92 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMII'IED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: WM. JOE O'NEIL, CITY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga street ll~~ Engtrieer's Report BhUnB Matntsnanee District No. 6 Commercial/Industrial FYscel Yeaz 1981/92 The annual report for Street Lightt1nngg Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercaal/industrial) -s prepared in comp7lanee with the requirement of Article 4, Chapter 1. Division 5, of the Streets and Iligliways Code, State of California (I.andscaptng and ughttng Act of 1992). This report deals with the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1991/92 to determine the annual assessment rate, The assessments wID be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operations, servicing and restoration of street Iight improvements as provided by Southern California Edtaon Company. Maintenance Is constdered to be of general benefit to all areas in the district and coats shall be divided as Indicate din the body of this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 was established for Commercial and/or Industrial properties mainly within the Industrial and Foothill Specific Plan aeeas. Areas included 1n the work program are the street lights within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City and aze limited to local streets. The work programs excludes maintenance of street lights !n rights-of-way of ma]or streets. Detalled maintenance acflvltiea include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for the Illumination of the subject area. Street lights were constructed and metalled by the developers for the Individual projects within the district. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1991/92 Projected Expenditures Assessment AdmWatratlon Electric Overhead Maintenance/Opetatlons ..yu.. (8.49% of Assort. Rev. Req'd. far 1/2 year) Less: Penalties (.25% of Assort. Rev. Req'd.) Assort. Rev. Req'd. $ 1,870 $10,500 $= 4.5850 $18,045 <$734> $17, 288 The rate of development and acceptance of street lighting within Street Lighting Maintenance Mstrlct No. 6 determine the actual expenditures of energy charges. It was determined that the assessment rats for Street Lighting Maintenance Dishict No. 6 wID remain at $20.00 per acre for F7eca1 Year 1991/92. Projected Revenue 863.42 Acres x $20.00 $17,268 A projected $8,634 carryover from Fiscal Year 1990/91 will be used to fund ails district for the first half of Fiscal Year 1991/82 until assessments are received 1n January, 1992. 191e following projects were ennead to Street [.t~-ting Maintenance Dlatrlet No. 6 during 8eca1 year 1991/92: CUP J~ 3. 1990 87-29 3 1990 J 7.18 AU. A DR anuary . 88-13 i i i99J 12.76 AU. ~yy~pGyt PM re ~~uarv . 12058 b 7 1990 F 7.58 AU. ANNEXED DR e ruazv . 88-19 b 21 1990 12.08 AU. DR Fe ruary . 88-11 h 21 1990 .80 AU. !P PM Mazc . 12848 13.32 AU. ANNEXED Apri14. 1990 CUP 88-38 1990 l 17 AU. TRACT gpri 4. 11428 il 18 1990 14 AU. gip PM Apr . 11410 22.2 AU. ANNEXED April 18. 1990 CUP 88-37 .7 AU. ANNEXED yJyJy 1R. 7931 CUP 89-17 4.84 AU. p PM ~+D wmh-r 5, 1990 12s98 6 t 5 1990 19.04 Au. PM ANNF X&D er ~p em . 12781 5 be 199 t 19.14 AU. . CUP , em r S;n 88-46 7 AU. n.a..ti... y ~ A4(1 CUP 88-18 b 7 1990 2.48 AU. PM lYovem er . 11940 q[I 5.92 AU. l2 PM i3ovem ~i 7. 1 13125 be 19 1990 19.2 AU. p PM r . Decem 12338 27.56 AU. ( ~~ ~~ -_-~-- J i ~ ~ ~_ ~. J IQ Qql '. I~~ ire 1 O '~1 10 •r LU. ~I CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONOA COUNTY O~ SAN NERNAROINO STATE ®F CALIF063COIA ['.`I~S7-~9 ~ Ss'~ ~C/ z ~/ EXHIBIT •A• r.SESSMENT DIAGR~df ' LAfNDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. v STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 t,~iuuir .~, ---_- LANDS ~ E MSWTEE.NNAN ~I a~TR CT` NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 r `~ ~ v ..3 CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY O~ gpN gRpNARpINO ST6~TF ®i~ CALI~OR~IA DR---~ ~9 cF Z ~ s ---- -~-. Ongmal=poor ~uaH#y ~~ - 6XIYOIT 'A' A~sessMENT a~AGR~~e LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND B '~~ig~nal=i'o~r_ ~ua!ity ~ a T^ 5-~=---- (~ (lwr...r U,., .. ~: ___ i~' .~ ,~~.; _ _ , ' ~'. it ~ ~~ '~ o,.n..d i i i Y,~. Rvcd J j ~ yyy 1 i'C "~' f . .ui I .iry _ _ , I 1 fY ~\ Ill <1J~; ;l/I ~l'l M~a1 /.~ ~ . X11 __~_... _ reg. . i_.. t• Ly,Z' Tu i r•"^'•- ~; ~.. -^ I Pc,j~e/ Z ~ i ~ ,.i.M, -~ -'I 1 ~. V t I i~rf.., )_ y Ir _.1Ai k ',, L ..~ w ~' `~ r~ ~ f ;,_,~ '~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .a C0~1NTY OF SAN BERNARDINO '~ ' - ptit l2-r,ss~ ~ ~ s~AT~ o~ cA~~FOC~NiA ~JPorcd 3 / ,lI4.W1 of •l1 A 'SES3MENT DiAGR[ A LANDSLIIPE MAWTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGFITWG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6.~. a,: esu ~aua~eowe we.• '~ 1~ ~'.. VJ~. v. ,~ c 0 ~~ ,~ u 1~~ r r z ~~ ~ ~~ ~ CIT'f Cdr °A.I~JCNO CUCAMON~iA COUNTY OR SAN 6ERNARDINO • 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~~// ~ ~. .I~s5BSSfiAEMiT D~hfii,~[Mfil LANDSCAPE MAWTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LlGHTNiG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Np$. 1 AND ~ r ~----- - Orig~nal Poor._~L~al~!y __ _ _ __ _ _ -:.~'_a$a~s~_a_nli1.E__ --5/TL's----- ~ ~ ` --- •- _.._ w• ~' _ • I.r . _. 1 ....... ....... ..... _... .. ..... .. • ~ ~ / L r.. t r 4 ! „ M, ~ I ~ ~ .._ _ F , ~ I 1•~ ~ ,~ a ~EJISON COURT ! ' ~ •~ ~ , n~ ., =~~ -~sv-~ F-• ~ ~. I, ~ ~, ._ ~ ,__ o ...._ .. a ELL CURT ~ ""' ,~~ - .....z• ~,I' ~ 'al I.- 9~l Z 7S ~ CITY OF RANCHO C~JCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN SERNARDINO ~ - PA11284f3 ST4T~~ OF CALIFORNIA 1 ,~ iwCir`I``.r3iYwVL~ ~ r~w~_..-__-. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. ~ NYd~ ~ `~rig~naI Poor ~uali~; ~- 5/TE .~..o e ~ r+` a~~ w. a t.~ `` ~ Yu ~ r ./~ ~ _ Gti - mil, ~ ' 9 +e- B. nn~ ~ ~I ___ Y ~ z- /~ „'~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO f STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 I .e,.~ ~. ~,~ .,,. ASSESSMENT Dld1R~RAM LANDSCAPE MAWTENANCB DISTRICT NO. 9 - STREET LIGNTNrG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 ~Orig~nal Fa~~~ua,'~ty ~,~., 4.revr sr,reer ~ - ~ ^ ~ ._. Ll6an v ~~ NN YN>Y fffaL( 1.11 Jf ~ ` ~~ MM WN41 fTefaT 4{4T Q. ma. (rre a wnf ffuv W eTxaaT~ reaa rrn r1f(• afwf srffa(, n•(i.u> ••aslrou. I N•vfn plM1a w.bMO•.p 4a•Ym/W!•, M•.IffTiL K.y/{Y r W a Z ~~{z77 CIT`I~' OF RANCi~lO CUCAMONGA ' CaUNTY CF '.IAN 6BRNARDINO ~ ~ P,u a RR-_'~ Q STATE QF CALIFORNIA ~;Cf r ~ EXMWT •A• ASSESSMENT DIARiRAM tANDSCARE IiNA1NTENANCE OiBTRICT NQ= 3 STREET LIGNTMrG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS- 1 AND 8 ~Qrb3nal i'o~r ~aa':"y - - ~ S/TE j • :fin ~ ..-~ "•;~~.' ,. I I iil••. "- `'__ll..•.'1` ~';i?!r.'!' 1 J I / rte. - %!''itLbu~... 1 ~ ~ -- ~ 1. ~ ~' ~ `~r.r~~ ~ -~ 1'~,._ ~ • ~ ¢~ ill -._ .e. '•. „~ y .*.-~ .`n ~I` ~ i' it ~•=,/~• 'V J,N~,rr I ,~, y` ~ ~ W ~ _~~:~. ~' It tom.. ~ i ..~. : ; ;/ t I- 1 ... ~. e ~- CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONSiA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1I~ r JI~SESSMENT DI/WR/~WI LANDSCAPE MAWTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 $TAEET LKiNTiFKi M1AlkTENANCE DISTRICT FiDS. i AHD 8 r --, ' _ ~' i, ~ ~t_~i '.'1 /i ~ '=/ ~, -- __ .1 .; r, 1.~~ l~ !~ 4......,. i ~. .a:~.~: _ _-T ..~ ~.~ I Ali: •.~ `T i ~i ~ ( wr r .r ....u I Y ~~ ~ ~ ~' I~ ~~ '`~~ mot--- .~ ~ .~ ~iri -'~~ ~~ ~. 9 ~z~~9 CITY OF RANC~lO CUCAMONQA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO pM 114-10 STAQE OF CALIFORNIA A~8ESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGFITING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 W Z w 0 z 3 W SI „_ . . ~1 V 1~1. ~~ ~,~P MILLER AVENUE 1 ~j Cl Z ~d .a { CITY OF RANCilO CUCAMONtiA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~!~ip 8_8_-3i STATO: OF CALIFORNI/C' -~..... /-~SESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAP€ MAWTENANCE DISTWCi' NO.3 STREET LlGNTWG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND B i~ W 7 z W 7 a e y ° o ~ o a _ ~ H > 1 I W ~ ~ .. -~ .. I ~ a -~ ~ I 1 ~t~r.ao wJ ~_~ , sa :.. 1'fu 1... <.~ d 9/... H.V ^_ 7 ~ S..e ~.r12 C..~.....~ w........~r _ N ~ """ """ "'''"" ' 19tn STREET I ~~Z~/ GTY OF RANCiiO C3lCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BE3INARDINO cuP e9-~7 n STA?E OF CALIFORNIA U 3 •~• - LANDB~CAPEgE MSAIN~TEF.tNiANDI p~jg~"" No. 3 ST~tE1=Y LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND e 7" z CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA _ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 71sSESSMENT DIA~i~AM 6ANDSCAPE MAWTENANCE DISTRICT Nd. 3 STREET LIGNT9~1G MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND e 1 O z ill' ,,,,~ ~ --;~ ,. ..1 ~. A O r S m m ... ~ ~~ !ui ::! BCv:: :°y M.~. _ ' _ - - t ARLEL - PA ~ P RCEL 1' ~y f ,..:......_ ,. .-~. .t -- - y Rbi.lV r v !:C 61n .`W ~ L.. ~.~ M.. 9~ z 83 ;I . ~:.~ ~~~ - CITY OF RANCI~10 CUCAMONGA .., _ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~7g1 ~ [x11147 ~~'' • -~~ I-SSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MIApiTENANCE DNZTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGNTMI~gG IIAAINTENANCE D18TRICT NOS. 1 AND e ~ rN~~ij~.~eut.~uUi 4~j:+~~k1~ I -- _ ~~ _ Bar E AVE. _ _ ~. _ ~oo.ao• r- I i i I~ I I ,{~ ~ i ; I ! ~'i, I j I ; JRnn ui .„ Ps~,~c__ i ; i ' $fi i ;I P:~,r~C=L i li i rl PM.n^. azi Ali I I I i ~ I ~[[i:c. rr^[t~ i ~ Paac=! 1 iL1A? ^x395 PGu--. 34 3 35 MK! ~~z8 e s ~v W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO n i STATE OF CALIFORNIA caP s9-ate t~ cx"en ~"' A~Sf:SSMENT pIMRAy1A LANDSCAPE PiAAiNTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 V aa; i,s ~ ~~ 1~ ,, ~„~ ,.. , ;;; ,,.. •.,.,., ,',..:: ., I I! - t •.~ ~i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA rUPBB-~B ~~ _i exwrr •.• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM . LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET IIGiNTNiG MApiTprA~g DISTRN:T NOS. 1 AlU1 0 9y Z ~ ~ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONOA _ COUNTY OR ~,N BERNARDINO I ~ 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~~ ,~., ,~ ~SS~II lX11~IT .A. ' f-SSESSIYIF.NT DfAIARAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 8 9y ~ ~~ ~ CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PM /3/~5 .. emr.,t •.• AS~SdN1ENT_WMRArrI STREET LIQNTN~1fi MAMfTENANCE DIS~NOS~ Y AND 8 ~~ z 8~ CITY OF RANCHO CSICAMONflA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARpINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA P'~C°' "~ ~z3~ ,~ ANNUAL 811TfiIIIiEER'3 REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (Etiwanda North) FISCAL YEAR 1991 /92 C11Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRA7iON APPROVED: WM. JOE O'NEIL. CIIY ENGINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineers Report -- - Street Lighting Maintenance Dlatiict No. 7 (EUwanda North) Racal Year 1991/92 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (Etlwanda North) is prepared !n compliance with tht requirement of ArUCie 4, Chapter 1. Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Cade, State ~ California (fandscape and lighting Act of 1972). This report deals with the protected expenditures for 8aca1 yeaz 1991/92 to determine annual assessments. The assessment will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance as provided by Southern California Edlaon Company. Maintenance fa considered of general beneAt to all areas 1n We District and costs shall be divided as indicated in the body of this report. Detailed maintenance acUvltlea Include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any pert of any Improvement providing for illumination of the sub]ect area. Street lights were constructed and installed by the developers of We indlv[dual subdivisions. The plans and street llght8 aze as stipulated In the condlUOns of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineertng Divlsian. 1'lseel Year 1981/92 Protected Expenditures Assessment AdatWSiratlon Electric Overhead Maintenance /Operations ..cam ~..:,-w: (8.49% of Assort. Rev. Req'd. for 1 /2 year) Less: Penalties (.25% of Assort. Rev. Req'd.) Assort. Rev. Req'd. $ 1,930 $ 9,000 $ 931 tE 1.081 $12,942 c6528> 612,414 After revtew of the current expenditures, protected revenues and increase to utility costa, 1t was determined that the assessment rate for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 should be 632.18 for lrtacal Year 1991/92. Protected Revenue 386 A, U, x 632.16 = ffi12,414 There is no carryover of funds for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7, as this is the first year assessments will be placed on the County's tax roll. The following proJecte were ennead to Street ughting Maintenance District No. 7 during fteeal year 1991/92: -- jl TRACT ~v 18. 1990 13565 16 990 90 A.U. ~~j~ TRACT ~y . 1 13565-5 38 A.U. nivivA:xrrn Mo.. ~ a ~ uon TRACT 13565-B 16 990 38 A.U. gig TRACT ~v . 1 13565-7 16 1990 M 44 A.U. p TRACT . av 13565-8 16 1990 43 A.U. g~~p TRACT . j}/gv 13565-9 b 19 1990 40 A.U. ANNEXED TRACT $gotem er . 13812 153 A.U. i ~~-~~ E%MIBIT '~' IIe501 uti on N0. 30.311 ~~ Page ~ AgSESSMENT DIAGRAM p -.._.,~ t~s1-~~ikY. I~nG111G~~~1~~4 ~,,, _. - 1 . --- -~ `, .~/• - . 1 ~ y .1~ i,~ ~ n r n ~~I 1 ~ . ~ a • .~ \ a~ w r '~ r r I r~, a r y~\[`y ~ I ~ ~ r I•~ t> ~~ Iv. J v • ~ I ~- ~ / .,`~ ~ .. ~ , ~,,,- .. ` e I ' _~~ ' ~ t. ~ t a I I I~ i ~ it7 ~ ~ \~ - - •r ~ n s i I I s n ~ ' // r~ t, \\ ~ r n ~ a ~~ rt,,\ I r to 1 ~. f ~ y a~ `,~ I i U lu\~\ i .• a t ~ II ~ Y Y I n i3 J Ir r I . J '~ ' - " '-- ~ __ ~ " CITY OF RANC4~0 Ct~CAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOTR r • ~ - .~ (, STA'G'E OF CALIFORNIA _ S ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANCSGPPE A4 P.(NTEiJANCE CISTRlG:T non. 7 CITY MAINTAINED 1AN05CAVE AREA TREE MAINTENANCE EOl1EETRAW TRAIL MAINTENANCE L1LIt; 'EXHIBIT A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAIvi LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM L,"-,NCSCA°E a^. F+I^: i'~rv 9NCE UiSTFfCT N~. 7 ._~~ C;TY MAWTAWED LAN0.SCAPE AREA TRACT 13565 TREE MAINTENANCE •~~~~• EOUESTRAIN TRAIL MAINTENANCE PHASE 7 ~\ A\!O L,,~:r, ~ ~• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A SIL II:~ 'EXHIBIT A' = a' 9 P ~4 ~: ~ix'~ a ~~ ~> ~; q~ Z 9~ , - , un ~ "~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ~~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTFIG7 NO. 7 :! ~~~~ C17V MAWTAMIED LAN0.5CAPE ARFA TREE p/AWTENANCE •~1~~• EDUESTRAW TRA0. MAINTENANCE TRACT 13565 PHASE 8 «' ""~?~ CIT'Y OF RATICHO CUCAMONGA e`• 4~X~~'~ ~_ `~ ~~ Q'(~Z t7 un l ~' [lll~~ A 'EXW ~~ N I( ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 ~~~~ GTV MAMTAPIED LANDSCAPE ANEA ~~~ T{IEE MAWTENANCE •~~~~• EDDESTNAM TNA0. MAMENANCE TRACT 13565 PHASE 9 ~c~ ^`~osy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ ~ `` ~~ I> un ll[I~~ 'EXMI N EXWBIT •A. ASSEsSWiENT DIAGIFtAM ,TREE? LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.8 FORMATION ~6r~g n~ al P~or_C~aa11tY -~E N/GNC.RO A~ER_E -„~.:.;~_.= : ..... / -- ,, ,iE CAT/LPA STREET ''' _ _ __ _ _ --:r~_ic-...._ .~ ..: .. _.._.. ..:- a relcr ~ -11h___1 ,!~ =_• . ~_.F :. i . ~ ~ ~?`i ~ -~-M ~ m i : ,,' a y1~i .~ .ei ~' rtFYIMG M.KFI I ^yy j N OY 'sl ~ s -' ..1 o v 0 0 3 . ~, ~I X Z 2 x S .i ~~.~ u F m 1 $ ~? S W w 4 ~ ~ '~ ~ 3, Z F i x ~ 8' ~I fl~ mP I ..._ ~ .~ ~'T ' " ... F`/iYI4C1 :.LS4/ LINti' •v i ~ ••" .. IT ~~ I it ~ _ o: I 1_'1.Lil•'~ IGTOR/AY STREEF ' - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y COUNTY OF SAN iERNARDINO ~, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,pM 1284 ~ ~ 9~v row ,. ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT STREET LIGHTING MAIIYTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (Etiwanda @outh) FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: SPECIAL. DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION APPROVED: WM. JOE O'NEIL. CTIY ENGINEER City of Rancho Curamonga Annual. EnglneeYS Report -- _ Street Lighting Maintenance IMetrtet No. 8 (Etlrvanda South) _ . ~.,. Fiscal Year 1991/92 The annual report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (Etlwanda South! !s prepared in compliance with the requirement of Article 4. Chapter 1, Ixvlelon 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Callfomla (Landscape and Ilghthlg Act of 1972). This report deals with the projected expenditures for fiscal year 1991/92 to determine annual assessments. 'The assessment will be used to furnish services and materials for the ordinary and uwal maintenance as provided by Southern California Edison Company. Maintenance !a considered of general benefit to all areas in the lKStrict and costa shall be divided as Indicated In the body of this report. Detailed maintenance activities include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any Improvement providing for IDumination of the subject area. Streetlights were constructed and tnstalled by the developers of the individual subdivisions. The plans and street lights are as stipulated 1n the conditions of approval for each development and as approved by the Engineering Division. Fiscal Year 1991/92 Projected Expenditures ....,.. Assessment Admidstratlon $ 5.00 Electric $100.00 Overhead $ 9.14 Maintenance/Operations S 12.96 $lz~.lo Less Interewt (8.4996 of Assmt. Rev. Req'd. tar 1/2 year) c$5.18> Less: Penalties (.2596 of Asemt. Rev. Req'dJ ~ Aasmt. Rev. Req'd. $121.92 After review of the current expendtturea, projected revenues and Increase ht uUllty costs, it was determined Wat the assessment rate for Street lighting Maintenance District No. 8 should be $121.92 for Fiscal Year 1991/92. Projected Revenue 1 A.U. x 121.92 $121.92 There is no carryover of funds for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8, as this is the first yeaz assessments will be placed on the County's tax roll. The following proJecta wen annexed to Street tdghting Maintenance District No. 8 during Racal yeac 1991/92: -- 4~~~ ~~ PM 12854 1 A.U. ORDINANCE N0. 447 AN ORDIlW~ICE OF if)E COPY OJ[FICIL OF ~ C1TY OF RANC}i0 Ql(`AlL1NGA, CALIFOHIlIA, APP%7VING II~IIX%1RIAL SPECIFIC PiAPI °' ., AMBS4F1T1' 91-02e E4lABLISFIDdG REG(RA12INS FYH2 RECYCi.II7G NLI,ECIZON AND PfmCE~'SING, AND MAI@K, FIIiDI1~GS IN SUPI'OHP 2fII~IiII~F A. Recitals. (i) on April 10, 1991, the Planning C<nmissimi of the City of Parrdn CUwmdt7a eord~x:tari a .a.~~ ^^+__wa. y.::.li.. ;,maiay wiVl Ceapect to the ahOVe- referenoed itxE:strial Specific Plan Amendment. Following the omclvsion of said public hearing, the Planning CGmnisaion adopted Resolution No. 91-36, thereby reamoetding that the City Conch adapt Itdustrial Specific Plan AmendmenC No. 91-02. (ii) ~ May 15, 1991, the City Oxmcil of the City oP Pa7rtw Cucamonga c~dtx:ted a duly noticed public hearing and oonclirlad said heariry prior to its adoption of this Ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurral. B. Ordutv~oe. lfie City Council of the City of Rancho n-K'~~xJa ordains as follows: SECTION 1: This CUUnil hereby specifies and finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Fait A, of the Ordir~ar:ce are true and mrreot. ~FS.TION 2: 'ltfis Council hereby fiats and certifies that the project has been reviewed atd considered in crnpliance with the California F}~vimnmental Quality Act of 1970, attl further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Fart III, Table III-1 v `.:.-aby amended to read, in w~~rds arKl figure,,, as shodn on the attached FJdnibit "A." Section 4: Part III, Table III-2, Section H is hereby allied to read, in words and figures, as follows: H. MAZ'II2TAI.S RFkUVFRY FACIISTiES (MBE`s) Collection Facility: Activities typically include the acceptance by donation, red®ption, or purchase of recyclable materials fran the public far sorting and storage. Such a facility may involve aggcagat- itg, weighing, arcl storing large amounts of material ~-site, ilGluding i~ili~, ompacting, or similar packaging operations for shipment. Outdoor storage may be permitted when approved by a Corditio~l Use Permit. ~~ Orditmme No. 447 rays a P pg reci.lity: AcCivities typically include, - - but are cot limited to: weic~ii.ng, haatirxJ, ~~1, ~hi+5, yrcindirg, £riquetting, mechanical sortiiYg, ... shredding, stripping, cleaning, aria xarenifacturirrg. ••. •. The finished materials are semi-finished or raw materials to to shipped for fr¢t}rer marrlfacktse aa' assembly. Sudi a facility may irrvolve wttioor storage of large amounts of recyclable ar proo~sed materials. Activities typically include, but see not limited to: the storage and sale tYtiID the uramian" ...~,~ .aa.... .'.`•i.y ui rmea, recyclable, ~' waste materials, emc>ept mien eudr activities are part Of a manufachsing operation. SkLTION 5: Part III, Table III-2, SubBOOtiat D, lard use type definition for "Scrap Operation" is helrlry deleted in its entirety. SECPION 6: Part III, Section N, Development Stardaltls, Subsectirn J is har'eb~+ added to read, in wur+rffi and figraes, as etroaar in the attached Exhibit "BJr SEITIOH 7: Appendix F is hereby added Lo read, in words and Pignuts, as shown in the attadied Exhibit "C." SECI~ON 8: Part N is hereby ametded to add "collection Facilities" as a permitted use within Qrh+*gae 1-5, 8-11, and 13-L5. SFY:PI~I ,~: Part N is hereby amended to adrl "Processing Facilitiesn as a oonditiort'illy permitted use within atier'ea 5, 8-11, and 13-15. SECTION 10: The Clty oamcil declares that, should arty provision, section, paragraph, senterroe, or card of this Orrlirranoe be rerrderad ar declared invalid by arty final cast action in a mnt of oanpetent jisisdio- tiny ar by teaser of airy preaoptive legislation, the remaining pxovisia>SS, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and wads of this Oxdi»atne shall main in full force and effect. Sk7.1'ICM 11: The Mayan shall sign this Oxciinanoe and the City Clerk shall cause the same to to published within fifteen (25) days after its paw^•7 at least once in the ~ijard Valley Daily Bollet;n, a newspaper of general cirtulatian publishrsl in the City of Ontario, California, and cirail.atsi in the city of RarYtw Wramonga, Califarnia. ~_, 9~ Ordinance No. 447 ~r .1~ /L~ (1f.ll u~i~ Page 3 SUh1MARY OF LAND USE TVPE BY SUBAREA • PERMITTED USE + CONOITIONAILY pENMITTEO USE NOTE: Non-m•ra•d Uw• Not Pum:u•o USE TYPE$ C V •tOm • I • • • •~ • ~i • • I ~ • • • • • I i~ Y Y•tllum ~ I+I+I+ •I ail • I•j•I I•I•• ' NUYY Ylnlmum Imp•C1 Nov ~ ~ ' FFIC PNOFESSIONAL DE !ON i RESEARCN Atlmki•tnUV• • k• • I +, + • +i '~ f • I+, + Profouan•1 O•uyn $•rrren • +~ + + • • } + • + i •.......e •...r.. I I•I •1.1. 1.1 • I•I•I •i• •, •I •I i•I• hONe l1•Y•y ~ ~•,!'~; 1;~1 I jc i.~~'•I ~~ ~ '~, •' I ~~ y m • ' • • ~ • • I • • ' • YNWm `~ ~^` ~.~ ! I+I •!7M +• ~nI•I•I.I.I ! •IAI I I cot lacc:on eautie :es f ~ ~ ~ • • a• ~ - ~ ~ ~ 2: acess sng eacvl: ues I, I ~' } ? +~I ~- t F + Amm•I C•n ifl AutanoYV• fl••t •la••• (f I I + AutemOtlW P•nl•bUginy Automotly ; LI•M Truck 11•P•Y•1a1Pr '~ `• 1 4 4utomobw Truck N•p•n-M•fa • I + AWOmouv sak• ! Aulomotlw Svvlo SI•tlon i + aulNllny ContrMar ~ ONk• i Y•rN I ~I + I • •mlOmy Contr•elor'• $la••• YMtl ~ I awwnv M•Inbn•ne• $HW1• ~~ I EWltllny a4yMlnq EqukmMt $Ipplk•a$•k•I • + • aU••MN $•PWY MtW • [•rvk•• • I • I • yurn••• Support 5•rvk•• • • 1 k 4 I •• i • ~ • ComlwMtl•tkn [•rv ~ • CpnY•MMC• $•k• a $•fY1N• +. + +. ENNp a dMMIUK [•ta•WI•IrN• Enbrtomnot } Etl•rglr• Impel C••••NPW Fitt Feo• $•1•• + + FkateW. Mw•ne• a MM [•tat• f••vlo•• • i Foptl a ••vr•y S•N• + + + ~ FVMI.1 a trMMarY [•Y••CN 1 Yovy Epllpnwnl $IW i 11•rtt•b I + + ~ MtN/MtNM I + L•uIMrY ••rvku I M•ap•VNwI[1 Cr• [•r•le• ~ • + I ~ PN•onM $IrvIP•• + + 1 Na1MtN.• P/o•Yetl [E•r•y r ! ~ I pKruflprlM F•tlaU•• + + + / lal ~ ICI l•I~I IfI+I•I I I i I I I+I+I Ifl 1 1 1 1 1 ~~~~+~~+~~~ I l~l++~~~Ai+I+I + +I ICI;~+I I I+I+I+I+I l+;+I +~fl I ~•I I II•I ~•~•I+I I +~~+~•MII ~~•I+I ~I•I+I+I •I •I •~ •) ~•I•~•! I I•I•I•I•I I•t•1 •~ ~• •~•jf ~••~••~41• •I ++++'+I+++I++++++I . ~ .1.1.,.,.1.1. •~. ~ + +I+ + ~+ +~ + + +I ..+ ~ 1+ •~ ~ I I•`•~ +++++ flf +r,+++'+`+' + +~' I ` I I ~+I • + • a • f+ •; ••. •i•.1 + +f+ + I•I+I+I+~ I•I+l 4 + f + +1`4,+, + +, CWtw•1 [al•IWr• Yp•et VIIWY RlteWtl•• ~ I Pkpa coma. uuutr cantlor heMC A•Nm•W I + ~ Pump $•NIY a uedny s•rvm•. ,+'.+'.+ I C I+I I +I I++1+1 I +1+I+~+ + +I +,+.+I+ +.+ +.+ + + + • + + IP-Intlu•hi•1 Parts GI-G•MrI11MU•Irbl NIr NI-Minimum ImPICt Npvy inou•v:ai NO-N•r•n Af•. OvN•Y 01•Uict NI-N••vY IMU•vul Ordinance No. 447 C ~~, E X ~9~ ice` ~ 1~ .~~I Page 4 J. MaTSAx1La w<coveny Pkcxlxixe- aT- SM putpoN o! Materlale Aecowry hcllltiee 8tandard• la to establish sinlmue standards [os eerNninq, parklnq, nolw, and litter control which aret tM lnesnq~,,,,. o! tM plan. gaUU apeeifieally andifisd through tM Conditional Ow Permit, all olMr developsrn! standards of the City of 14neho Cueaannga shall apply, Secluding but not ilelted to, gradilp, drainage, and etrwt Lmprovemenb. J.1. All business operations shall M condueted vlChin an enclosed building value specifically MIm{tteA v1tM„ ~b n.ww.1 ~..w......., ., -_.w --_..... Industrial oategeriu sad adequately soreened tree publla vicar pursuant to tM Saetlon k, aensral Provisions, !os tM ;ndurtrlal aeeu in pastleular, screening from tM onlarlo I-15 Pseeway sMll be caqulssd. J.Y. kll LseLlitiu atoll M maintained ltee of lltur sad wnln aed any otMe undseirable uGSlal and atoll be cleaned of loose dehrim on a dally baeim. J.3. TM Leillly sMll scat tM parking rsquirsmenb for vaeehouo uws. In addition, stacking specs shall W provided for six whlrlu or CM anelelpatW pack eusterr load, whichever 1• higher. If no drlvewp Lacllltiee us available, than • aLLnlaum o[ s1: addltioaal spaces [or eustamsr drop-o!f sMll W providW. J.B. Parr-driven equlprnt, includilp aluminum foil and can ooapaetinq or bailing, neeu.ary for ef[lcien! temporary storage and shipment of materiel sMll b• peemitted. aa a Ordinance No. 447 ~l~• EX ~ ~ ~+.?~, • • L •t Page 5 APPLNDI% F RECYCLING DBPINITIONS Tha following definitions are offered to provide clarification to technScal terw relative to recyclable materials and recycling operations: Coeetructlom Matte - Conlttugtion and demoliCion debris, dredginge, grubbing from land clearing, rubble resclting from eanetruction, remolding, repair, and demolition operation! on housing, eomwrcial buildings and other Drswtid - A clsu for Qiscards that occur! both in the home rend in the work place: i.e., bevezags container! and n.wspagre. waR v...a..`-sal IYSlsa - Natta derived tram industrial or wnufaeturing opsretlona loch a! chip building, construction, and demolition operation!. Ltght ImdmstrLl Wb - recta derived from research and development facilitlss end light wnutactuzing operations such a! semiconductore and computer msnufaetuzers. MattrlaL raroemz~ Paa111t1r (amPm) - The point of extraction of valuable raw wterialt, which axe then sold on the cosrodi ty and !crap wrkst! or are used as pare of a wnufacturing operation. Matariela targeted ere paper, plaseie, glees, wtnL, textiles, and other goods deaawd similar by the city p:annar. rac7cLDlq - Mryclablu ass discard! or waste material, tMt era collated, operated, or proeaued, and used sa rar wterlels or products. Typically reryelabUS would include: aowstiet each a beverage containers and newspaper, eardburd, high grade paper, pLStlct, textllat, light industrial rate, or ocher !!miler wterials. TUrycLble! are not inUndad to Sncluda: chemicals, toxic water, heavy industrial ruu, gtrolsum, constructlgn raste unsorted garbage hovY wUU, or other similar wtarLl! a determined by the City Planner. tYlc7eliaq -Tha aarlee of activitlas by rhich wtariaL the[ would otherrise M dl spogd of, are collsattd, operated, or procuwd and uwd in the tozr of raw madrlaL. CITY OF BelivCIl~ c;~rC~A1~Nt;~ STAFF REPORT DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mgyor and Neabers of the Ctty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, ComaMJnity Development Director BY: Nm. Jce O'Neil, Ctty Engineer CIIa.1Ff.T: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR TIN: ANNUAL LEVY OF ASStSJIa:a~~ M1in1a iric PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD -851 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council hold the Public Nearing and approve the attached Resolution authorizing the levy and collection of assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District (85-PD). BACKGROIMN)/ANALYSIS Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year City Council must approve an Mnua1 Engineer's Report which reviews the status of the district and pro5ected revenue and expenditures to establish the rate of assessment for the next fiscal year. During 1985 bonds were issued in the amount of 57,334,776 to finance construction of Red Mill and Heritage Community Parks. Mnuatly debt service payments are paid from the annual assessment. Each year approximately 5820,000 is required to meet this obligation. Th15 results to a net assessment of 535.00 per single family residents with other assessments at rates established as shown below based on the size of the acres involved. 1991/92 Single Family S 35.00 Less than 1.5 acres S 11.50 1.5 to 3.5 acres f 52.49 3.51 to 7.0 acres 5122.48 7.01 to 14.0 acres 5244.97 14.01 to 25.0 acres 5489.93 25.01 acres or larger f874.88 /O~ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT AND RESOLUTION FOR 85-PD June 5, !991 Page 2 the bonds that were passed Tn 1985 were intended to repay the construction costs of the Parks and provide funds towards their maintenance. Tha historic costs associated with the maintenance of Red H111 and Heritage Parks are as follows: 87/88 5312,000 88/89 f593,000 89190 Sv5/,uUU 90/91 5438,000 91/92 (488,000 Budget for 1/2 yenr only Approximateiy 54b of the current costs are befog subsidized by the City's General Fund. As time has gone by the maintenance costs have continued to rise. Revenue from the bond issues has remained relatively static. The annual increase fn the activity of these parks (from baseball, soccer, footbail, etc.) along with going to a year around youth schedule has resulted in additional increase maintenance for these two much used parks. As costs have increased well beyond revenues, staff has continuously adiusted maintenance levels downward to be more in line with funds available. For example, weekend crews have been reduced and are subsidized with volunteers. Slope maintenance is done only on an semiannual basis rather than monthly. Mowing, weeding and trimming schedules were reduced, etc. Maintenance casts which Lhe City has little control over have also escalated trmnendously since the original bond issue was passed 1n 1985, Significant Increases for 1991/92 in maintenance costs for water (f15,000), electricity iS11,000), and Vehicle maintenance IS12,000) are maior players contributing to this escalation without even meeting material costs. These increases along with other costs have resulted in a needed increase 1n next years budget by nearly 550,000 which is an overall 124 increase. Pro3ections for future years indicate these maintenance costs will not decrease but will increase at an estimated annual rate of 9g. It should be noted tfie above increases do not refl ect anticioaroa. capitalized costs to the parks within the next 3 t^ 5 ears. these costs could Include equipment ~~,^h as playground equipment, restroaes repair and/or ~eplaeement. The cumulative effect of both the increased park usage, maintenance costs and projected capital maintenance costs trigger the need to review the need for an assessment rate increase. Otheneise the General Fund will have to subsidize these costs further. Additional /p c~ A cln couNCIL STAFF REPDRr APPROVAL OF ANNUAL ENGINEERS REPORT ARD RESOLUTIOR FOR 85-P6 June 5, 1991 Page 3 pressures that have been pi aced on the C1ty's General Fund clearly show this district should have to Bore and sore rely on revenue collected fros the district itself to support first class facilities that are now in existence. Currently Lhe Assesssent District charge is 535.00. M increase to eltsinate the General Fund subsidy would result 1n a f48 charge. To bring the level of service back up to the forcer levels would result 1n e 352.00 charge. The C1Ly COwnc11 should consider all the factors above prior to caking a decision on the assesssent asount for FY 1991/92. Respectfully subsf ~N1ck 6aaiez Coaasnlty Develo nt Director RG:NJO:diw Attachoent /d~ ~ nasourl'ior No. ~I 1- ~s 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THIC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. 1'O ""' LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WI'IiIIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85-PD (HERTCAGE AND RED HILL x COMMUNITY PARKS) J n0, ~~~ WHEREAS. the Cfty Council of the City of Rancho CucemonQ6 dld''!!on the pith day of May. 1990, adopt its Resolutbn of Intentlaua No. l to order the therein described work in connection with the Park and Recreatlon Improvement DisMct which Reaolutloa of Intention No. was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as r+equlred by IDav; s~a~by the aflidavit of Publtcatlon of said Resolution of intentlon on file in the O~c~ of the City Clerk; and qp-~~3 WHEREAS. said Clty Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concenitng the )urisdtctlon facts in this proceeding and concerning the necesatty for the contemplation work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Juriadictlon to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Connell of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District for the Fiscai Yeaz 1991/92, and said Cfty Councll hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. _, be done and made; and G71-i21J SECTIOA' 2: I3e if further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer 1s hereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: 13e it finally resolved that the assessments for Fiscal Yeaz 1991/92, method of assessment in the Engineer's Report and Ute authorizatton to expend 1990/91 administrative fees for park maintenance are hereby approved. ~~ /~6 G PARK AND RECREATION ID~lPROVEMENT DISTRICT IPD-~) FiSCALYEAR 1991/92 CTIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMITTED BY: ASS ~ MENT REVENUE ADMINIS112A7'[ON APPROVED: WM. JOE O' , CCI'1 E GINEER City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report 85-PD F!se.1 Year 1991/92 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 1991/92 fiscal yeaz !s prepared pursuant to the order of the Clty Councll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and m compliance with Cite requuemenis ~i eu~iicte ti, Gitepiet i, L+utun~ayc auu i.iguua.g iu:i of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth tmdinga and the assessment analysts for the annual levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreation [mprovement District No. 85-PD, thereafter refersed to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Pazk and Red H1ll Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands wlUtin an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or pazcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or pazcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a pazcel will benefit from the improvements Is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the cLCSSiflcation of various areas w(thin an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the Improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. a Ae the asaeesments are levied on the bade of benefit. they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal govenvnenk are not aseeasable without the approval of the paztlculer• agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for ~"" railroad mainline right-oF-way, public utlllty transmission right-of-way, common azeas, and non-profit organizations (i.e., churches, clubs) are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home pazks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. T1CTTJiM• nTrnr verc A Improvement District Boundary The Improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Vletoria & Terra Vista Planned t.ommuMtles. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared to accordance with Sectlon 327 of the Revenue and Taxatlon Code, which aze on file rn the office of the San Bemardlno County Assessor In the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bemardlno, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. H District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreallon Improvement District No. 85-PD. G Facilities The existing works of improvement aze generally described as follows: 1. The construction of Heritage Community Park Including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigatlon, onatte roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, reatrooms, equestrian facllltles, playground equipment, picnic facllltles, athletic facWtles, and walldng, Jogging and equestrian trade. 2. The construction of Red Hill Community Pazk including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigatlon, onsite roads, sidewalks, pazking lots, Ifghtlng, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facllltles, playground equipment, picnic facllltles, maJor lighted athletlc facllltles, Jogging troll, underground storm drain system, and adJacent public street Improvements. Esr>Mw~ of woRx 'Ihe Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 pe rmits carrying forward surpluses or recovering dc6cita In subsequent fiscal years. Coats for the ,... distrlM will be reviewed annually. Arry surplus credited against assessment .-..-- or any deHctfs shall be Included U the aaseeament for the followhrg fiscal Y'~• 1991/92 Ffscal Year Estimated Costa ~ Budget Summary Balance from 1990/91 Hud¢et $ 685,433 Ue[1Cra1 t'U[lU 1{CInUYItlCLICI~I for Park Maintenance s s22.ss7 8 382,796 gQtected Interest Redemption FLnd $ 34,271 special Reserve AYmd $ 17,000 Ea-psndltnses county Spedal charges $ 6.138 Spedal Districts Admin. $ 122.765 Debt Service Installment (1/2/92) $ 300.000 Debt Service Installment (7/2/92) $ 520,000 Maintenance/OperaUona $ 299.724 $1 .248,627 IYIE7HOD OF sPREAD The Landscaping and Kiting Act of 1972 Indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs - among all lots or parcels with the District >n proportlon to the eatLmated~"` beneets received. A DefUdtlons The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: r•emcnnav n .....~...~,._ _ yo: -:.:u `uaoiu uu we uumi)er VI CMBURg residential uNts within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B -Includes all parcels not defined 1n Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor or which have an assessed value of less than a.500. In conducting Ule search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes >n excess of 1.5 acres and type codes of, for example. resident[s] or agriculture. These pazcels were added back Into the rolls and assessed. 13. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use tnformatlon contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A All pazcels containing existing residentlal dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Paccel Size Range Number of Existing Res. Dwelling Units/Parcel Less than 1.5 acres and 1.51 to 3.5 acres and 3.51 to 7.0 acres and 7.01 to 14.0 acres and 14.01 to 25.0 acres and 25.01 acres & lazger and 1 or more dwelling unite 2 or more dwelling units 4 or mote dwelling units 8 or more dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dweWng units Category A is based on the number of existing resldentlal units. The actual assessment for Hond Debt Service per existing resldentlal dwelling unit may - decrease each year as more residential units are built within the Improvement district. Maintenance costa, however, are expected to - inerease annually and will somewhat offset the anticipated decrease in ""' assessments due to new development. Category B: All parcel not defined In Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownerships; 3. Railroad mafrilirie rights-of-way: 4. Major utlllly tcensmtsafon rlghts-of-way: 5. Mineral ri re; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less: and 8. Non-profit organizations U•e., churches). C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year 1991/92 is $35.00 per dwelling unit for those pazcels N Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit well be assessed for an amount equal to $35.00 times the number of dwellmg units. Category B: 'Che assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal yeaz 1990/91 shall be according to the following schedule: Definition less than 1.50 acres 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres 3.51 acres to 7.0 acres 7.01 acres to 14.0 acres 14.01 acres to 25.0 acres 25.OI acres & lazger Assessment Per Parcel ffi 17.50 $ 52.49 ffi122.48 5244.97 ffi489.93 5874.88 Category C: 1Yle ae6e88ment shall be •0.00 for Category C percele. PROJF:CIED 1991/92 ASSESSMLNI'S 11.ba1 ram~•wral. 241 Multl Palori lay Ur0 I.80Aniv W981 PwBs 1.6 Aae~ b 9.60 Mr+{40a PaaeW 9.b1 Ache b 7.O Me4 pY1 Piuu14) 7.01 Aeni b 14.0 /1Crt4 (191 PiYOeW 14.01 Me b 7E.OAa44148 hra14) 1601 Aca4 a lu,er (R9 wroeW 11.6{1 Ddb d ~ 9600 4.8001®Ib ~t ~ 9600 9061 • 17.60 40841 • 60A8 118i {11248 191 ~ µp44.97 ~~ ~~~ 1 116 ~ 17,880.48 ~ 91,081.07 • 77.018.8E ~~ IM~I M~ M 85-PD AnnpraNona for Fiscal Year 91/92 TRACT + Novemher 1. 1989 13930 h 7 M 1990 29 AU. ~ .~ TRACT :: : : . arc 13890-1 : o 7 .na 51 AU. . .~..... , TRwcr . ua. . . 13890-a h 21 1990 M ao Au. PM . ars 12848 h 21 1990 M 19.32 AU. ~~p TRACT arc . 13738 l 4 1990 16 AU. TRACT IA F . Apri 13898 il 18 1990 7 AU. PM Apr . 11410 ril 18 1990 22.2 AU. CUP T gp . 88-37 ' 29 1990 .7 AU. TRACT j~ ly . 13316 123 AU. ..~,. crr~ a~ x~xcao cxrcao~orrt~s Farb ~ Recre~aaa Improvement DL~lCt 90 vo 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 BB/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 90/91 91/92 Plat Y9rr ---~- Aeaaa~naniRW nrmv nn n a.u a yr ntzav a.nv a„n,n ern nv v.y STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, and Members of the L1ty Council F°?M: Jce O'Neil, City Engineer 8Y: Dan Jaales, Senior Civil Engineer DUUJlG1: KC UL~1 rUN IRrUNU rVK 1'VKI lUNJ Vr UIU11tO1hL rcca FuK 1JlOl ~IbIUIt1M Ota On a SOU 5 e 0 c r a ree an eas o wands Avenue RECOMIEIOIITION Mr. Banks has raised a policy issue regarding refunding of drainage fees that requires City Council consideration. BACKGROUND Mr. James Banks, Jr. is requesting a hearing before the City Couc11 via letter dated Apr11 i6, 1991. Mr. Banks is requesting Council consideration of h15 petition for a refund of a portion of the drainage fees he paid in connection with the issuance of a building penult for a roam addition to his restdence. The facts as stated by Mr. Banks are accurate. In short, Mr. Banks obtained approval from the City for the rode addition in mid year 1989. Mr. Banks obJected to a condition of the approval by the City which required planting of certain trees in the right-af-way. Ouring the time Mr. Banks appealed this condition to the City Council the Ordinance establishing a drainage fee for all peneit issuance within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine focal drainage area was approved by the City Council. The effective date of the Ordinance was November 5, 1989. N1th the appeal of Mr. Banks requests for release from the tree planting condition he was unable to pull his building perwtt until January of 1990. Therefore, Mr. Banks was brought under the new Etlwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fee which was not in effect at the time of his original approval. From the staff view point the issue is quite clear that the building permit was obtained subsequent to effective date of the Ordinance providing for the new drainage fees in the Etiwanda area. It 1s true the delay in Mr. Banks being able to obtain his bull ding penult was due to a condition subsequently appealed to the City Cou~rctl. Release of the condition was granted by the Ctfy Council. Once that release had been obtained, then Mr. Banks was able to go forward and obtain his building penal t. i - -~ /~' CITY CWlKIL STAFF REPORT 13181 VICTORIA ST - JAMES BANK, JRS. June 5, 1991 Page 2 Since the building per~it was received after the effective date of the Ordinance, staff does rrot have the authority to grant release in this situation through adetlnlstratlve review. F1na1 interpretation as to the effective date of the Ordinance relative to the building perslt application by Mr. Banks 15 an issue the Council will consider during this Dublic hearing. Letters free Mr. Banks detailing the issue and a response letter troe the Ctty am C41A411au iu iris agenda iiae and chase iecLers neari sTAte CIN tads relevant to this rapuest for release. If approved by Council the refund could be approxiabtely f4, 700. Respectfully suheltted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DiYISION\ %' Joe O'Neil ~/ City Engineer JO:OJ:diw Attachaen*,s ~o~ ~ Ban~ce & Ritchie •u .550C .1i0x O•.llp qx CAS . Aiu E$ 0A N45, JR •F OIaAS 9 RI )ENIE qC 3E~' E nNCOSEN 11 December 1990 Jerry Fulwood City Manager's Office City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive ....G o.uvuyn, ..niiiornia Y1/!U Dear Mr. Fullwoodt Y VI,C I{O CIVIC CCN)[R UW Of IIC {3 IO1GG CIVIC [(N SCR ORIV{ . ~~ gANCMO CU CtM OHOA~ OA ~IVOPN4 91)JO ()I"I DG0~06)) I am writing to you because you do not know me. That may seem bizarre at first, but I don't want to put any of my friends at the City "on the spot" by making a final demand Eor payment of money I feel the City owes me and put them into a position of having to reject me. If you reject my request, I can simply file my suit against the City with no hard feelings. Since you have no previous background with my problem, L will explain it briefly and then thoroughly. The problem arose when my wife and I sought to put an addition on our home at 13181 Victoria, 8tiwanda, California, legally described ae the East one-half of Lote 2 and 7 of the Preliminary Map of Etiwenda Colony Lands. The City of Rancho Cucamonga imposed a condition on the issuance of a building permit for an addition to our residence. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, in effect, required us to plant a row of Eucalyptus trees along the Victoria Street frontage when the time is right to do eo by the recording of a "lien" against the property. The Etiwenda Specific Plan (ESP) ie the planning map and program for the Etiwenda area of Rancho Cucamonga. The ESP puts considerable emphasis on the preeervetion of existing windbreaica and planting new ones where old ones F.ave failed. The ESP provides for a Eucalyptus Maculatta windbreak along the south side of Victoria Street which is the north boundary of our property. The ESP contains maps which show the lxat {_on of the Eucalyptus Maculatta windbreak. I don't know the exact distance, but for purposes of discussion it ie sufficient to say that the ESP calla for a Eucalyptus Maculatta windbreak 30 feet south of the center of Victoria Street. Our neighbors to the east and west have windbreaks which are roughly 30 feet south of the center line of Victoria Street, The windbreak on our property ie approximately IS feet south of the center line of Victoria Street. Ae a condition of obtaining a ~~~ r' i Jerry Fulwood City Manager's Office 11 December 1990 Page 2. building permit for improvement. to our home, the City Engineer required that we olant a new Rnr.tan4... Y. n..1.44. ...a ..aL--.,. epproximetely 15 fast north of ouz existing Eucalyptus Globulus windbreak. This was patently aboard but it wne what the EEP required and the City Engineer was incapable of seeing any logic in varying from the BSP. My position was that the policy of the ESP was the preservation and promotion of windbreaks end that the requirement of planting a new windbreak 15 feet north of an existing, seventy-five yeer~ old windbreak with 100+ foot trees was senseless; either the new trees would die very quickly oz they would compete with and eventually kill the existing, mature windbreak. I explained this to the City Engineer but he was unmoved. I paid an arboriet to visit the Bite and evaluate the City's position e^ against my position. The arboriet concluded either the new trees would languish and die or they would eventually kill the old trees. The City Engineer was atzll unmoved: we had to plant the trees or not receive a building permit. Firmly believing the City Engineer's position to be irrational, we appealed the decision of the City Engineer through the City channels end ultimately to the City Council. The City Council heard the explanation of the (Planning) staff, studied the maps and the arboriat•a report and then informed the City Engineer that his requirement, while technically correct, was inappropriately applied under the circumstances. As one City council member told the city Engineer, "That's the dumbest thing I ever heard.^ The City Council informed the City Engineer that he should come up with another method for resolving the situation, The City Engineer then suggested the idea of a "lien" to ~seure the planting of the windbreak in the new location at the appropriate time. The ^lien" is our promise to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, when the conditions are appropriate, we will install approximately 20 Eucalyptus Maculatta trees and provide for their irrigation in the EBP alignment in front of our property. By direction of the City Council, the appropriate time to do this would be when the existing windbreak hoe aubetantielly died out. ~Q~ Jerry Pulwood City Manager's Office 11 December 1990 Page 3, ! • ,"..: .. r=;.Sla:,:....,;, Uaoe ur iuur montne to resolve. During this process many events occurred but two era of particular importance and I lint them in the order of occurrence: We satisfied all the requirements of the Planning and Building Departments and eubetantially all of the requirements of the Engineering Department saving and excepting the windbreak requirement. The City Council, without notice to us, increased the drainage fee requirement by approximately 56,000. Payment of the incrensed drainage fee wed required as a prerequisite to the issuance of the 6uildinq pezmit despite the fact that substantially all City requirements had been met well before the effective date of the increase in drainage fees. I paid the increased amount "under protest' and I soon began to request a refund. I have written multiple letters to the City and to the City Attorney. The City staff has stated that they "'st dc..^.'t know what tc do with my request and the City Attorney has not responded. I have bean extremely patient. This ie my notice that if I do not hove a full refund of the increase in the drainage fee by the end of this cmlendar year, I am going to file a Complaint against the City and seek to recover the funds by court decree. I would much prefer to have a person of Bound judgement intervene and do whet makes good sense. I am hoping that will be you. I hope to hear from you on or hefore 2-Januexy-1991. C~ncerely es c ~~ JBJ/dn (((___ /o ( IJ i u r .. C C R t1 NC HO C UC r1 MO NG ~~ April lo, 1991 James Banks, Jr., Fsq. Banks & Richie 10788 Civic Center Drive Suite 120 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 41van Re: 13181 Victoria Request for Refund/Appeal op Storm Drainage Fees Dear Mr. Banks: The following is in response to your request for my review of your problem regarding the above-referenced matter. I have now had the opportunity to review all past correspondence and discuss these matters with the pertinent staff members involved, and I now feel confident that I can respond to your concerns. In review of the correspondence on this matter, it appears that the central facts and circumstances have been well documented and are not substantially in dispute between you and City staff. As I understand it, this matter originates from the imposition and interpretation of two particular conditions imposed as part of your application to construct an addition at the above-referenced address. These were, as you know, a condition for windrow tree pre=_ervation (relief granted by appeal to City Council) and the imposition of standard local drainage improvement fees. The di£f iculty arose when, pending final resolution of your appeal on the windrow condition (and prior to issuance of building permits), the City Council adopted its ordinance No. 402, thereby establishing the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Storm Drain Plan (the boundaries of which include your property), together with applicable fees. Pursuant to the terms of the Ordinance, these fees would be (as in your situation) calculated and collected at the time oP building permit issuance. However, the Ordinance also established new Pees to approximately double those you had anticipated at the commencement of your project. Your position, as I understand it, is not so much a dispute as to the applicability oP doing a drainage impacts in your local area or the calculation of fees, (either based on Ordinance 402 or its predecessor) to your property, but rather the timing of the ~~ Mgyor Dennis '. Stout ~ Cauncilmember Done Willigms MCVOf artriem `Nilbgm J 4lexgntler G~Unotlmember Pqmelq J. Wngn' :qcu '~qm. AiCP. Cif Mgngger ~ ~ Cquncamemoer Chgnes J Buque• Nr. James Banks, Jr. April 10, 1991 Page 2 effective date oP Ordinance No. 402 based on the circumstances applicable to your particular situation. Specifically: that ynu should not be prejudiced or penalized by pursuing your appeal rights when that adversely affects other conditions; Essentially, that when an appellant is successful, all other conditions (i.e., the drainage fee) should have been frozen to the law applicable at the time of seeking those appeal rights. On review of this matter with the Engineering Department, it appears that City Engineering staff applied the basic policy approved by the City Council as to the applicability of ordinance No. 4D2 to pending application. That is, the ordinance was drafted and presented to the City Council on the assumption that the new fees would be uniformly applied to any development application which had not previously paid Pees at the time of the effective date of Ordinance No. 402. Although Ordinance No. 402 contains an appeal provision to contest the applicability of local drainage impacts of a particular property or the calculation oP fees to a given property, there does not exist a relief procedure to the basic policy assumption as to the effective date of the Ordinance. This was the situation when you initially requested relief from your condition from the Engineering Department and, I believe, continues to be the applicable situation today. I hope you understand that this analysis is offered not without sympathy to your position or that your argument is meritless. As Z am sure you must suspect, a number of applicants were caught by the same ordinance change (most with dramatically higher fees than involved in your case). In discussing this with the Engineering Department, many, if not most, such applicants also complained as to the affective date and impact of the new Ordinance. On review of these instances, I believe that the City treated each equally in their liability to pay fees. The simple conclusion from those instances, as in yours, is that Prom a staff perspective, the City must treat all applicants (large or small) on an equal basis. I sincerely regret any confusion or delay in responding to your concerns. Please feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions or comments with regard to any of the matters contained in this latter. Sincerely, B ~I erry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBF/tlr JBF:357 / D / ~_ Bank & Rit~6.F- Nx .550<:.i10'~ 0/ .ii pn x(v5 JAME$ OANNS. JR. iXOMAS 9 RIiENIE RC dERi E M1NUO SEN ~~~~:ii.'.....'~ t~YK 1~1 i~~~ CITY OF fn'YCHO CGCA'U:LA 16 April 1991 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Post Office Box 807 Cucamonga, California 91730 SUITE 120 CIV IF CCNiCR LAw OIIICF] 10)HB CIVIC CCNTCR pRIVF RANCMp CUCAHpNGA. CALIIOR NIA BIl]O ~)IA~ 9Bp p6]) _i_ RE: request for refund or portion of drainage fee Dear Clerk: I request an opportunity to be heard by the City Council concerning my sequest for a refund of a portion of the drainage fees I paid in connection with the resuance of a building permit for an addition to my residence. I have made several previous requests for this refund and my last appeal was denied April 10, 1991 by Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager. while Mr. Fulwood's letter of April 10, 1991, gives an excellent review of the question, I would like to review the problem in a little more detail and present my position as I believe you will present this letter to the City Council to acquaint them with the problem. I applied for a building permit to add on to my residence in Etiwanda. I passed the requirements of the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning Department and Building and Safety Department. I passed the requirements of the Engineering Department with one significant exception. The Engineering Department interpreted the Etiwanda Specific Plan in a fashion which required me to install a new row of Eucalyptus trees about fifteen feet north of and parallel to the existin~7 windbreak along Victoria which is approximately 75 years old and in relatively good condition. While I could have acceded to this requirement and conformed to the condition for a cost of less than 51,000, I regarded the condition as absurd and protested it. Although I was willing to pay all fees and obtain my permit with the understanding that I would conform to the final decision on the tree issue. when it was made later, I was told that neither would fees be accepted nor would a permit issue until the tree issue was concluded. I proceeded through an appellate process with Brad Buller to whom I furnished an liberalists report (at his suggestion) at a cost to me of about 51,200. The arborist's report concluded that the planting of a second, parallel windbreak fifteen /0( U City Clerk 16 April 1991 Page 2. feet north of the old one was very foolish. Mr. Buller recommended compromise solutions. The City Engineer would not budge one inch. i appealed to the City Council. The City Cnnnril •.. t.: a~... n:«.. .. _-l .:._.y i.-.~=. i:n ni:uuid come up with a sensible solution and he did, the night of the City Council meeting. I agreed to it on the spot. I paid a day or two later. During the approximate four months duration of the tree appeal, the City doubled its drainage fee requirement. The adde3 coat for my project was $4,817. Thus, the drainage fee increase, the arborist's report and the coat of waiting ran the expense to "do what is right" to far mare than $6,000. Zt should be noted, according to the arboriat's report, if I had followed the City Engineer's requirement, the health of the existing windbreak-- which the Etiwanda Specific Plan seeks to praserve-- could have been seriously compromised. The City staff has denied my request for a refund of the increased drainage fee on the theory that the fee increase applied to everybody with building permit applications in progress went the ordinance became law and to allow one exception would open a flood gate to similar such requests. I submit that my situation is different from the typical person with a permit pending and that the differences 3ustify the refund. Z will explain why. (1) My application, for all practical purposes, had been approved before the drainage fee increase went into effect. With some possible minor diacrepanciea, the only impediment to my approval weeks before the drainage fee increase, was the City Engineer's steadfast refusal to compromise on the question of the second windbreak. I had done everything I was required to do. I had met all requirements except for one requirement which was later waived. My application was really not in procesai it was approved except for a later-waived condition. (2) 2 did offer, both before and after the drainac. fee increase, to pay my fees and obtain my permit with the~tree question excepted from the conditions based on my promise to obey the ultimate decision no matter what it was. I don't recall the lady's name in the Building Department-- an attractive brunette in her 30's-- but she declined to accept /D( ~ City Clerk 16 April 1991 Page 3. one of my offers to pay fees which was made within a few Jaya before or after (I can't recall which) the drainage Eee increase. But, even if she does not recall or Z cannot nYtinr+uiou MF F ~.S~C ue:u }, }b 10 Ntll l.alnly obvious that^I^would have done so~ifVallowed to do eo. (3) The condition to which I objected was based on a "ridiculous" interpretation of the Etiwanda Speei£ic Plan. Any decision maker with sound reasoning ability and good judgment would have allowed a deviation without undue delay. Thus it was, by the obatinance or fear of one civil servant taking refuge in a trivial interpretation of a minor requirement and unable to see the overall purpose of the Etiwanda Specific Plan that prevented the approval of my plan in an ordinary time frame. (4) I was carrying out one of the major goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by seeking to preserve the existing, magnificent windbreak. The City Engineer was adhering to a pedestrian reliance on an obscure drawing in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the result of which may well have been to defeat one of the major goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. (5) The drainage fee system is to provide a mechanism for financing flood water runoff generated by development. I still own or control 19 acres at the site of my house which are not covered by any improvement. I have no plans to develop the property. I am doing more than my fair share of percolation and I am not contributing in any fashion to any runoff problem. In conclusion, it is simply unjust and illogical to charge somebody an extra $4,917 and cost them an extra $6,000 or so when they have met all of the rational requirements, offered to pay and tried to carry out the legitimate goals and purposes of the City thwarted only by the narrowest conceivable construction of an isolated provision of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which would have resulted in a defeat of an important overall goal of the Plan. I request that the City Ceuncil deem my application to have been approved when the last requirement other than the second windbreak was met. This date preceded the effective P'= (Cl City Clerk -~^° ~^ 16 April 1991 Page 4. date of the ordinance which increased the drainage fee. having established the rolled-back approval date, I request a refund of the $4,817 overpayment of the drainage fee. incerel Jamea Ban , r. JBJ/dn (~ ! ~' - i,~1TY ilF RANi,HO (_;T_iCtl ibiiiN~A STAFF REPORT DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager FROM: Wm. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. 6111 i1 and, Public Warks Inspector TI SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion ror Tract luzlu - Almond tntercept channel, located on the northwest corner of Almond Street and Sapphire Street RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 10210 - Almond Intercept Channel have been completed in an acceptable manner, and 1t is recomaended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond 1n the amount of 558,740.00 authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk tc release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 5587,400.00. BACK6RWN0/ANALYSIS Tract 10210 - Almond Intercept Channel - located on the northwest corner of Almond Street and Sapphire Street DEVELOPER; Nordic Development/First Hotel Investments 1500 Quail Street, Suite 520 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 58,740.00 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5587,400.00 Respectfully obmitted, . ~ ~~ l~~ Wm. Joe O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment O RESOLUTION N0. ~( Jl ~ l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ~;,_ __ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 10210 - ALMOND INTERCEPT CHANNEL AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of Dublic improvements for Tract 10210 - Almond Intercept Channel have been completed t0 the satisfaction of the City cnn~nnn.• awn WHEREAS, a Notice of Completlon Ts required to be filed, certtfytng the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ,~-~r_ /~3 CITY OF RANCHO Or1nA>KC;~1C STAFF REPORT DATE: June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor and MembeYB of the City Council FROM: BYad Buller, City Planner eY: Miki Hratt, Aaeociate P1aM8Y SUBJECT: COUNTY PSPHRRU. aa_ne - ,n6.aaea CREST - Prellminary Plan of Development, Master Tentative Tracts, Tentative Tract Nepe, and Final Plan of Development far 1,239 single family unite, commercial, actnol, park, and open apace on 1,111 ncrea in the Aencho Cucamonga Sphere area: request for review of City's requests to the County Planning Comiasion and Hoard of Suparalson. RECOMMHNDATION: Staff Iequeato that the City Council reaffirm its poaitlon on the development of properties in our Sphere-of-Influence and support the actions ae suggested by staff. BACKGROUND: The subject project ras heard by Che County Planning Coomission on May 23, 1991 and continued to June 6, 1991. County staff recommends approval. At the aforementioned County Planning Comm:isalon hearing, City staff requested that the project be denied without prejudice. The key reason is because this project Ss dependent upon the Htiwanda North 6pecific Plan for infraer rvctu re, financing, and design. Therefore, approval of the subject project should not precede adoption of Ne Specific Plan. It should be noted that City staff ie continuing to work toward the goal of a jointly adopted County/City Specific Plan. Also, approval of the subject project by the County would be inconsistent with County General Plan policies for 6phererof-Influence azeas, in that, the intent of County policy is to encourage annexation of Sphere areas, and approval o[ this project could discourage annexation. The subject project would discourage annexation because of negative impacts on the City ..ht^h inc. inch. fi~~! -_~ nct ~_,,,~,.~„ w, ~,,,, following: Traffic impacts: impncte within the City are partially identified and partially mltigatedl Park Impacts: except for approximtely 5 acres of enrncumbeced pork at th!! SuCmit Avenue site, the park package is conceptual and otf-aitel ~V T CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COURTY REFERRAL HB-06 - VNrvERE iTY cRRCi` June 5, 1991 Pays 2 Drai~ga Impacts: storm drainage flows do not follor the City'• "~""' master plan of drainages Polies Impsetm: current County policy ie to convey police services to the City upon annexation, bat to retain the tending for police services in the County general fund. (POi additional reasons for the request Eor denies rithout prejudice see the attached staff report to the planning Co®ieeioe. Mav 29. 1991.1 On May 29, 1991, the City Planning Co®ieelon reviewed issues and co®ents recomended by City stetf. A au®ary of the review by City Planning Commission rill be presented to the Council as past of staff's oral report to the Council. Two letters from Mr. Joe DSIOrio were received by the planning Co®ieeion and filed. (BN attached letters of MaY 23, 1991 and May 29, 1991.) Revier of. staff reco®endatlone on the subject project gives the Council an opportunity to reaffirm Council direction to staft on tits subj act project and in general, the development of land In our Sphere of Influence. In order for the Council to off ire ire intention, staff suggests that Resolution No. 89-568, requesting the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors to support City ennexstion efforts in the City's Sphere-of -Influence, be updated and forwarded tc the Hoard. The Resolution is attached with one "whereas" added, and item "6" replaced. (New language appears in bold and deleted language in strike-out.l Res ly itte Hr H City saner BH:Me:mlg Attachments: Letters from Joe DiIOrio Planning Comotiasion Staff Report of May 29, 1991 Resolutlon Requesting Support l~ rG<.' '~ The Caryn Company i Lka~(OlFce tk>x 9?lb.~$~. I~Nna G1926i7-0216 olr~e (, r4~ a~-sux, rnx (tla~ a~-sr3 May 23, 1991 Mr. Ray Ferguson, Chairman Planning Commission County of San Bernardino 385 North Arrowhead Avenue Sen Bernardino, California 92415-9189 Re: Rancho Cucamonga Representation Dear Chairman Ferguson: Today at the Planning Commission public hearing on the University Crest Planned Develop- ment and Maps, Mr. Larry Henderson, Sr. Planner [or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, spoke at some length, representing that his statements reflected the official position of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Since the current City Council has not discussed this project, I do not believe it's appropriate [or Mr. Henderson to be representing his opinion, end perhaps those of other Staff members, es an o[Picial Ci[y posilion, particularly on a matter of such importance end partirularly after what is perceived as a major change in the complexion of the City Council since last November. I had requested of Miki Brett (Mr. Henderson's assistant) that before she or Larry spoke at the public hearing that they specify [heir position was not necessarily one the[ the current Council had or woWd approve. Ms. Aratt assured me that [hey woWd make that clarification. 1 was again assured [hat clarification by your Staff today [ha[ you had passed on my request again to Mr. Henderson and Ms. Brett. 1 did not get the opportunity to state my objections during the public hearing, so please accept this Letter protesting what [believe was a serious mi;representetion by Mr. Henderson, coupled with a severe distortion of the facts in his presentation. I would appreciate County Counsel giving advice on the matter end would hope that the matter can be clarified by the time of our continued public hearing on June 6. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council, f believe, would have [he time to review the project before then in some manner and should they not review it, I do not believe any City Staff statements should be accepted during the public hearing. As always, it the City demonstrates good Faith in trying to resolve this matter, I am happy to cooperate in any way I can. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Yours tru/~ly~`, ~°~ ~RF. lJ~+~ ~.~dl J Joseph N. Diiorio President JND/jas cc: San Bernardino Cowtty Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council Ms. Velery Pilmer Mr. John P. McGuckian ~t`-' rev-x-1??I 1d: 26 FttOn :par; :'7MFGN:r -: =g^..-- _. _, The Ceryrf Company AxlOllkeSox 9716. Bo. Igquna. G 976M-0216 o~~(7t,E~+s9-s929 rtic(~f+)~9s-srr~ _ May R3, IYSI ~.~ Chairman end Memtiers VU g~ Rancho Cucamonga PLnning Commission City of Rancho Cucamot~a P. O. Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Caltfornla 91789 Ra: May x0 Staff Report, Vniverdty Crat Deu Chairman and PLnnina Commiaslonere, Havln¢ leaned yeatudey this 1Hm wu on your agenda for today, we Mve not prepared s more specific reply to the Staff Report. SLce tM etaff Report genuaIIy repeats items discussed Let summer, 1 refer you to two of our replica distributed than (a 18 page detailed respoeroe by Land PLn Design Group dated August 81, 2030, and s tMee page summary rr spume by The Caryh Company dated September 5, 1090). The Dnlveratty Crest is an Ltagrai part of the BUwanda North 3peclfie PLn (ENSP). SLce Lst summer, both the City and the Cowty Mve issued LRaft Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) on their respective ENSPS. I believe both HIRS Indicate both ENSM are quite aimllar, contrary to many of Staff s concluefont. In addition, the County's (COroortlwn's) ENSP has tiem the suD)ect of • Flecsl Impact Report (FIR) by both One City and the Cowty. [ believe these FIRe and their acrnmpanyir:8 Financial and Phasing pLm show the Comwrtiumb ENSP fd fiscally sound and provide financial commit- men4 to puke and open apace, roads, schoo)s, fire and iLod protection and commwity identity than e9 requfrcd by the City. City Staff may rwt like how we ue planning to spend the money for these services, but we are commited to spend tt, uNika other nearby City approved proJecta. To date, the City hae refused to do ^ PIR on Itb ENSP. I believe ouch a FIR would show the Cityb HNSP to be unachlavaWe. Pinelly, the Cowty has aub~eMed the UNversity Crrt to a series of Eat and Plat oriented testa to detarmtne its compatablHty with LM 8N8P. City Staff has done no such testing to back up its claim that tM Univentty Cwt may not De compatible with the ENSP. Also sLce Lst summse addlUonal traffic stadia have lsaen done which offer proof the Con- sortlumb soluUoro foe tM Day Creek HovlwatW-WRaon Ltmeetion and the ali¢riments of Etiwanda Avwiua and yintsQs Drive aM t»ttar tAan City 9tafTa proposal, 8taft has rw anoUar study on LM Day Creek-WiUOn Lterchar~e and now cpncw' wtth Ne Consortium. PerMpa 9teff would syree w[th tM Comwtlumb solutions for EUwanda and Vintage it Staff were to do additional study. While i romeml:u yow rnmments of Lst summa tMt it may not tie the Commissions perogatfve to comlder economic ImpacU, I urp you to consider these further studies when l~ ~ ~v-.,9-tor: :~: ~, _~ cc~r,a corvariv rc :e-a.:s =. as Chatrmae ana Hamden oS Rancho Cucamot~a Pkmninr Commiploa bay R9 Maff Report, Dniveraity Crest May Z9, 19p1 Pap Two ... dbcuasieg Statfie report. Cm award thb Item V on your agenda as a Dlreeton Report, and the actions of the Commiploa may take are limfted, Dut repreaeMatfvaa of the applicant are avallaDle for dlacvaa[on in a mon appropr4te favor. Reapecttul-y, .N>aph N. DQorio PreddeM JND/lq ca Mr. Aopr samuaLsn Mr. Pete BafgermaW Mr. Pat Mcpuckkth Mr. Tim Johroon ~6 g !-! 1' Y ! ~F 1fAN!H!~ l UL;AMUNI.i 4 STAFF REPORT , ~S DATE: May 29, 1991 ~~ TD: Chairman & Members of the Planning Commission i FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Brett, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COUNTY REFERRAL 88-05 Ln~IV RSITY CR T - Preliminary Plan of Development, Master Tentative Tracts, Tentative Tract Maps, and Final Plan of Development for 1,239 single family units end commercial, school, park, and open space on 1,111 acres in the Rancho Cucamonga sphere area; request for review of the City's requests to the County Planning Commission and Boaxd of Supervisors. I. BACKGROUND: The aubj ect project was heard by the County Planning Commission on May 23 and continued to June 6, 1991. County staff recommends approval. On May 16, 1991, City staff requested a continuance of the item for the reasons stated in the attached letter to pat McGUCkian. On May 23, 1991, City staff requested that the County Planning Commission deny the subject project, without prejudice, °_or the reasons stated in the attached letteY to the County Planning Commission. City staff has prepared preliminary comments on the subject project which aze attached in draft form for your review and comment. The comments are arranged item-by-item and refer to the County staff's report to the County Planning Commission (see attached). Please note that additional exhibits will be available at the Planning Commission meeting. II. ANALYSIS: Following previous direction from the Planning Commission and the City Council, City staff is recommending: * That approval of the subject project be deferred until the County adopts its Etiwanda North Specific Plan; * Because, as stated in the County General Plan, the County's goal is to "encourage cities to annex urban unincorporated areas within designated City Spheres-of- Znfluence and support annexations/incorporations of lD~j PLANNING C9MMIdSI4N STP.FF REPQRT CR 88-OS - UNIVERSITY CREST May 29, 1991 Page 2 urban designated lands" -- and even iP the subject project does not annex to the City, it will impact City infrastructure and services -- City Standards oP Development should be followed] and That since the subject project is within the Etiwanda North SpeoiPlc Plan area, it should conform to the City's draft Etiwanda North 6pecific plan. ^t tCC ,, .. L, imoa iuy i+y Lne county Planning Commission, .City staff recommends that the City focus on several substantive items, including: • opposition to the intensity of land use with a recommendation that the project conform to the City's Hillside Development Ordinance and that parcels above the lower Edison Corridor meet the City Standard for Very Low Density (less than two dwelling units per acre), as shown in the City's Draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan; * opposition to the density bonus because the subject project does not exceed the minimum City standard for design; most of the proposed amenities are designed off-site; and the project may be consistent with, but does not exceed, the design standards Por the County's draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan; i Request Por coordination with the City's draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan with special attention to two means of access, protection oP Etiwanda Avenue from traffic impact, and design of Vintage Drive as a collector street; and + Request that the city's minimum Quimby Park Standards be met. III. RECOMMENDATION:. Staff requests that the Planning Commission support the focus and comments on the subject project prepared by City staff for the County Planning Commission. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Attachments; Exhibit "A" - Draft Comments to County Planning Commission //v .... May 16, 1991 Pat McGUCkian Cooney of San Barnardino 785 N. Arrowhead Avenue, Third Floor San Barnardino, calitornia 92415-0180 SUBJECT: UNIV ITY/C oeT PUS a7-0104/w121 49 RT s 8[ss n ,gp •OR waY 3. 1991 P .iwwIN- COMMZaaIOR Dear Mr. McGuekian: we respectfully request a continuance of the subject !teas scheduled for hearing at the county Planning Cossission nesting of May 22, 1991. The reasons for Lhia request are as follows: o Provide adequate tine for CSty stet! to review the draft "Addendum" to the draft final 8IR since it vas net available until May 16, 1941. o Provide adequate tine for City staff to review the rwised PDP vrtieh vas not distributed to the Clty until May 16, 1991. o Provide adequate tine for City staff to review conditions by county staff which will not W available until Msy 17, 1991 at the earliest. o Recirculate the draft •Addendam• aspnq responsible agenciu vhicb previously coamented, in as Hoch ai the draft final EIR wu completed in August 1919, but never revleved by the county Planning Couiasien nor certified by the Board of Supervisors. o Renotlce the hearing, in as such as the last notiM via SepteaMr 30, 1990, and responsible agencies, adjoining property owners, and interested parties nay be under the impression that this project has been withdrawn from conalderation. Moyp Denrns L Stout CosxlCtlmMaMr pgna WNNams MQyO~ P,O iOm WilliOm J AlaaOnCa! .~ COU~C~ITNPbar POrtsalo J Wngr• :oc~ :om. aCP. CM ManoOer ~~ Counovssarsttsw CIgMS J Buvue• ...~ ...:- 1•.e 00 Bo. i:' . ~~ ytomorya G G112G . (1t A)cBO.•85t LETTER TO: ppT MC GUCKIAN aC: UNZYERSZ?Y, CREST May 16, 1991 page 2 In regard to notice, this project is proposing land use and ~ circulatian conditions that will affect adjoining property owners who should receive individual notice, for example: o A is-acre park site is proposed Lar Southern California Edison (SCE) property. o Trail• era proposed for SCE property. o use of SCE service roads i^ proposed for additional trails. a The circulation systu m.y impact tutors development o! SCE property north oL the lower east-vest SCE easement. o Drainage facilitlse are proposed fora portion of SCB property. O ^TempOrary attest aCCeae a11d ewer ea/ement is proposed across Property owned by SCE. o A school •ite is proposed for the property owned by Raquel S. Moya, et. •1. o ]1lthougA the City has conditioned Remington Dewlopunt on the wet and Natt Induetrlee on the east to build Vintage Drive ae an east- wet collector street, no provision has been aade !or Vintage Driw through the proposed development. o Day Creek Eoulewrd will biaeet the houN o! Laura and VSMent Sudeta aeW theiz preperty must ti• acquired by negetiatlona or eeMemnatien as a condition of development of this aite. 0 other ad]acen6 property owners may haw iuwa or aotleerna about thi• dewlopment. Further, in regard to notice, the •project application ana environmental tindings^ were not available at the time the previous notice was circulated, and only became available on May 15, 1991. (( LETTER TO: PAT MC GUCKIAN RE: Ui:l•.'ER3ITY/CREST May 16, 1991 Page J In regard to the "addendum" to the EIA, the document which vas - praparad appears to be erroneously identified as an "addendum". Tha draft Final EIA was completed in August 1989, but waa not -- reviewed by the County Plnnninq Commission and was not certified as ~~"~~~ comp late by tM 0oard of Supervisors. Not only ware changas made to the prof act circulation and development plan, but also substantial new information occurred because the project was incorporntaa into the more comprehensive Etiwanda North Spacitic Blan. As provided by CEQA when only minor changas in a prof act are made, out n-•• ±..~eraation of substantial importance to the project t»comea available, a "eubaaqu.'.t" *_Se may W prepared. Hseause o[ aubatantial nev information, the document prepaa:: ~~^eld ba a "subesquent" EIR which must be ciranlsted for public review. Certainly attar the lapse of aisaet two years and consistent with the intent of CEQA to keep the public informed, the new environaental documentation ahauld M circulated to reeponsibla agencies for review and coamant and made available for public, raviw. Thank you for conaiderat ion of our request tot continuanea o! the Vnivaraity/Croat item. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION ~/ L.Henderson, AICP Principal Planner LSH:MB/ko ec: Sharon Hightows Randy Scott Kathleen 6rowM GratCben Stangl Mayor and HnMrs of the city Council Chairaan and Me~bere of the Planning Coaa.lsaion Ralph Hanson, Deputy city Attorney Rick couz, Coasunity Dewelopaant Director Hrad Huller, City Planner rf~ ~ ~~ 'v` L K O ~ L' L .~ ~l O \ ~~r .~ May 23, 1991 Mr. Ray Ferguson, Chairman .~.. .. and Nembera o! the Planning commission County of San Bernardino 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415 SUB,7ECT: UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, CARYN COMPANY (J. DiIorio)/UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTS, PUD/87-0106/W121/49/PUDP~ pRELININARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ETC. Dear Mr. Ferguson: Tha purpoea of thla letter is to comment on the subject project and to raquaat denial of the project without prejudice. Tha basis for a denial without prejudice is inconaiataney vith~tha County's General Plan and Code of Development, am well ae ineonaistency with the City's General Plan and Coda of Davelopmant. Further, the request for denial without prejudice of the subject project is based on trio incompleteness of the application, including lack o! concurrence by adjoining property ownara, whose parcels era naeeasary Lor the baaie inLraatruetura !or the aubjact application and whose parcels are e>rpaeted to contribute substantial amenities Lor the subject project. Also, this project cannot stand on its own without the infraatructura plan, the fiscal plan, fiscal mechanisms, and the resource management plan eomponenta of the Etivanda North Specific Plan. Therefore, the request !or denial of the subject project is based on the prametura submittal of the subject applications which era part of the application for trio County•• Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Further, i! the project is not denied by the Planning Commission, it should W returned to staff for adequate processing, including but not limited to adequate notice of hearing, adequate opportunity to review the proposed revised project, adequate environmental raviaw period on aupplesental anvironmantal documents, adequate discussion of environmental impacts, ma wall as, revised and adequate mitigation maasurea. Mayor Dennu L Stout ~ Counciimernber Drone Wllloms 'daYGr Gro`ym NdliOm) AI2MOntlEr Councdmember Ggmglp J /'Jr'Q'• .a<u '.am, AICG GN Monoger ~ ~ CWfILIIRIBrTlber CnQlleS J Buq~=•' ';5^l_ _.. __ 7 .. . 3c. ?C' c (~~r~5 or7c CA ++`29 ~.i', :9a. r95, . :~~/ / n County ?fanning commission May 27, 1991 Pag6 2 Regarding inadequate notice of hearing, inadequate ~~ opportunity to review the project before you, and inadequate ~^"'~ environmental review period, please refer to the attached letter to Pat McGUCkien o! Nay 16, 1991. It should be noted that the Lull package of documents, including the complete staff Report and the Conditions of Development ware delivered to the City on May 21, 1991, two days before this hearing. However, City staff has alraedy begun the development of a s,..-..~1 its--bi -it=r. aaro.-.o. Liw ~ouncy•s rianninq Commission Staff Report and anticipataa finalising our comments within the next 7 days. Again, should the County Planning Commission not continua this matter and dat~nrmine that action is appropriate today, City staff requests that the Planning Commission reco~and denial without prejudice fot the subject application. Further, in reeoamending denial City stelt requests that the Planning commission direct the applicant to coeplete additional environmental assessment and project redesign including, but not limited to, the following: • To resubmit the application following approval of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan; + To provide a seismic study of the school silo in conformance with seismic policies of the County General Plan and with the adopted Rancho Cucamonga Rad Hill Fault seismic study Area; • To provide adequate mitigation measures !or traffic impacts on the City of Rancho Cucamonga circulrtion system; * To provide adequate mitigation measures for the cumulative loss of alluvial fan scrub habitat; • To participate 1n biological mitigation measures consistent with the Etiwanda North Resource Conservation Plan which will W adopted as an environmental mitigation eeaeure of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan; * To design the project consistent with the Etiwanda North Resource Conservation Plan policies; + To enter into an agreement, such as a Memorandum of Vndorstandinq, with the California Department of Fish and came and the V.S. Army Corps of Engineers to participate in a eompiehensiva 1601/604 permit plan for the entire Etiwanda North Specific Plan arse; its County Planning Commission M.ay 23, 1191 Page 7 + To redesign the plane with no residential density bonus .. unite consistent with the County policy to grant only.~••~ one public incentive for preservation of open space; + To redesign the project to be consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan when it is adopted. The Specific Plan will establish the backbone infrastructure system, the backbone financial plan, and financial mechanisms for improvement and maint•nanca oP the background infrastructure system; • Tc -c cay.. Ln• pian with eurvl3inear streets end internal paseoe in conformity with the County General Plan Policy which encourages preservation of natural contours to preserve slope, riparian instates, and viewsheds; • To work with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to design the backbone circulation system to protect Etiwanda Avenue consistent with the County's General Plan Policy LU-9; + To cooperate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to redesign the backbone circulation system to provide access for all developable parcels of land consistent with the County's General Plan Policy LU-9; * To work with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to redesign the landscape plan consistent with the City's Xeriscape Ordinance, the Etiwanda North Fire Protection Study, the Etiwanda North Resource Management Plan, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Etiwanda North Specific Plan landscape palette consistent with the County's General plan Policy LU-9; * To meat all requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonge's Development Code, including the Hillside DevelopmenC Ordinance consistent with the County's General Plsn Policy LU-9; * To acquire additional property to provide 4.7 acres of unencumbered park per thousand population on-cite or redesign the proposed traeta consistent with the County's General Plan Policy LU-9; + To acquire agreements to lease and/or landscape SCE and HWD fee easements for trails and lnndscapinq uses or to provide all trail and landscape amenities on-site; • To provide property owner consent to plan the off-site portion of the school Bite; ~! K/ County piarininy Commisaion May 23, 1991 Page 0 * To provide property owner consent to acquire land !or the backbone circulation ayatem, drainage facilities, ~, drainage eseeeenta, temporary access easements, and/or to bond for condemnation. Thank you for eoneideral ion of our comments. Si~ y~\4~~'"/T~~ /Brad ~uli~c./ City Planner Beam/ifa AttaChlente cc: Mayor and Meebera of the City Council Chairaan and Meebeza of the Planning Coseleaion Ralph Bannon, Deputy City Attorney Rick coees, Coae~unlty Develepeent Director Sharon Bightover Pat McGUCklan Gretchen stangl-Charlton Randy Scott Rathlaen Browne `C ~~~5''(`~"•~ .PLANNING DEPARTMENT I~d~~~~;- Staff Ret~art. FIEARING DATE; 5-23-91 AGENDA ITEM NO: 4 a: b, c, d, e PROIFCT DFSCR1PT10~1 ... (Y `,h' ~IVITY MAP 1~1 urd 1~ r 'Origin ,~ K al_Poo -.x:TY: ~ Y~9T YA[1[Y [wTM1~, yti ChY2: " • /:xJC: w\ [aryn wv.lop.\nc Co on.-omvxln-{]/PUpv' 's [: aalvvl ~~ i:iC6AZ: P[LL41wry Vo ioP..nt 9Za: ! c 1.31a .\la.nti.t Yn1t\, uarc: ~ tNee1. e - nj~ en 1.111 y.[x, .rd eP.e \qu ~ .- 1 rY.i ..A:ief.: NSUl\v'paAV%v.tWC. )'1 lYea[YV[ll~y c' • APPLZGM! a[9.nu of VnlwcelLY aL Gll L. U MuLGl3b cwWZtY Nan. rald/iM0[x: nl FOps-ol)i/Yli1-a/WW pnoSYOp \•yyw, .P: YM/Pl.p M\19n 4[OOp P[L[/Zxe[X: GTa 1: al >P/13.011)/Y1i1-5]/ ip 3\{9i 0611[t/1 . ) /r >Po>efAt: `. llNl Orvi pNn t vlcn - 3 ~a r I IV a:.,unT: M1TC PvNn ce_pnY c/e iw Pv tcele L rylr as un Y::iN, 1\v.. o=1, 1 c .]cx: a i 1 rp/n-P3{t/nn-u~WPy • w wm xual I 1 / xuul - ., .. .... . - . lam 2 el '°i sYml.1.1~ tu.a . I + 5: ~ Pelv n /nn,lv... . • .[q wY Ce.Y: [[o \1M1 :.- ` •, 1 11 3PoPA1: A) /Ln\1 0.v.lop..nt 93en L 66p ~ \ of fi---iii"TTT ala.na\1 a =n e. {a w: m QUIT 1a1:: ' eclvtM\ AwnU. Yb ]SU at[ut. cc A9eLIGX2: Ilpu:t. o[ Vniv.a lcY a[ t.lix. !P• Pr.rJ[ UlYlavN rI3L/IM4EY: A) Po/13-ella/YS[1-PS/WP/ /SL4ZxDOL: 3•eli] nNN 013x W1i1-]]/SY 1t3]) a) W/ - CANT: T:1 Gryn EwgnY r/o lo. PL to:la , iSL' ]a { 1{\]1 5 t]1i ::.[/ZNJE%: AI r0/{3-Y1{lrylll-A9/WP1 G}A 1: Q failGfl I ::t/ZIIJCX: elll/V133-.P/ al rG/1]-YSaS TllA~ ZMrosSI: 5 A) r1N1 eYPYne !lb 1f N- I l 1111\{e{ ilmtl TY {I] tee. cle.nllcl Unlt., `I.{{ 9L~tt 1 - {.iCrt ortreitl. tcl:eel prc4 I1f.51 iJPoSA nl` wwleMtOt Pl.n !e[ {6p u : R a 9` l Tx ltl fe[ {60R1ow't{]~c 6f u. ol 1 ~ t .C t i[AV!! totAllp Sly l0[1 op lll.al I s .....::ox: Avmut Ida >c .ro4 [il ^Vna IpCAiiox: N~9eLM Wuw. pd wY crux c[onlcq ~ I -a. mpx elYl Vtn'u PLP: rtLt`lc o[ 1Tt C.Nn [o. = ~ h4 PPESEmVFg q?EN SvhG. mEV40PME1T1351lt /oa L.u ~\.. a.u ^~MtuY B7 HEARING NOTICES SENT ON 5'13-91 REPORT PREPARED BY: Ci. Stalwl-CI~ P.C. FIELD tNSPECitON DATE/BY: 5-21--91: Commissioners Donbrowaki [Teeters b Fasterx9av Sl'IE DESCRIPTION P.-VtCEL S¢E: 1,111 acres ACRES/DIMENSIUNS (675,8 ac=.15-808 slopes TERRAIN:._Ptn proposed for development: gentle to moderate slopes (33 ac=0-585 154 ac=5-158) \'EGF,TAT]DN:~} H1 k 1 t 5x t t ;S,~apd h h t 1 Ll 1 1• ES157lNU LAND USE: tmdevloped GE~•ERAL PLAN LAND USE DISTRICT: WP/PD-2/15 WF/PD-3/1 IMPROVEMENT LEVEL: IL-1 OVERLAY DISTRICT: Eire Review Areas 1 6 ?; Pioodplain (FP-1) Zone A• SCRROUNDING LAND DESCRIPTION LAND USE/ GENERAL PLAN LAND USE bISTRICT/IMPROVEMENT LEVEL/ OVERLAY DISTRICT ~" FORTH: SCE Utility CocridorsJWF/PD-1/1, WF-IN/IL-1 *•for portion to be developed. SOUTH: Highland Avenues residential/City of Rancho Cucamonga E.~ST: residential vacant/PD-3/1 PD-2/1 WP-IN/IL-1 /Gj{~ of 12ancho Cllcamonaa tl'EST: SCE Utilit Cocridor/sand 6 gravel operations wash/WF-F~•15 WF-IN/IL-5 _ --ZS-vT rrT.a nno AGENCY COMMENT CITY SPHERE OF INFL.L'ENCER3X6R(dWF City of Rancho Cucamwaga - reconmends denial project is inconsis[ent with city goals5 policies, standards5 and ordinances. '•\'gTER SERVICE: Cucamonga Countv Water District -recommends aooroval cending extenslpn~ ac xI:tles ;EPTIC/SEWER SERVICE: Cucamo Count water District - _" ,5'fA FF RECONMENDAT10,1': APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS :,a, //g h;;:':~~'y>: I _w~; ''' ~ ~~~ 3l'aw~.AY 3 I' ti2.. .. LL t,'F/FI~1 3 1 ~•• I w~/RO-I/i =a WF/PD--1-~ =u] I' _ ' ~ 1 1 I - ivl zo-~a rturlpo-In IRL 2.5 '' wF/Pr-1/I '-1 ' 'I~ ~ I 6'F/P~J -'. /1 uFIF '~ 'nF/rD-!/1 ~~ ' UNIVERSITY ~CRESI '~:;. ~,. ~. ~E/3 ''/':- ':I ~' ~ 1_/ 1~/' . ~ ~ W~1_ ~.... S RPJUS AREAS ~ J~,^"`^""~~ II~IIIy ,' i ~„ I i ~ I ,(II I; I w -_. p pf ~ I{ CO RIOORA EAS .~~„~', ~'p~ J~ m I~ ~ F ~. '~i 0°EN SPAGE AREA ~~,i,: .~.m fX' ~ :~=.:-EI' I I+i~ ~ 11~r1i r ~4 ~~il'' ~ m ,~ ~'Mml ~iVl~ti~l~~~ glr~~V v r I~F'~Y i ',sir ~'~ f,a ~XI Ir S n?I,. 'O D .X,'y".+=i~ 41 i~4 NM rl''i h~ E _ _ a r`f C -7 n ~ 0. X .. n e "Illi hrG'LX+6~enl ~. ~ / ~--~ J N n I JI I ? 5 1 p { xt7 `~~ ' W m 'I i p `~I ~ry~ "'° II Iui'loll+ y ~ ~ I ~Ir lJr "~ul ~~N~ P~L^ya '.".: :. ~'~ Iu I~I~i~n' aml t hali~ili ~ h~ol~s ~I hl+~.~ +~w~.':, Ili < ~~4'0 Ilhkl, it ~I~hiy~all~h~~~': S~ ! ~nlnnau • . . INI~.: II~II~.r~, ~ ~I 7~IIIb rr _ Y Y I I ~ I I'i ~ Iy XY~~ .; . ~~~IY y ry 3~ a~ F' M 4 aT„ .~'•'~~ wf I{+r~^"EXh „hh~~l 4j ~~vi '~u I~ iIIJI I~~P IF ~+~ ~ war . ~~ ~,--f Y uPIf "FI X4I~I a I 4i ~-Cj II I .~ ~•r~ 4 IXX~~ I i .~/ J 'I ' Il~' I~ I~hII~~74 JgI ~' 1~ X XIW ,~ .~. A fY'-' ~ ~-.°~ ~1' ~.; ~YJ '` p I",Ni, P(4 ' ~ . i'~ a ~1 uI~ ~ X~ I,'Jr I :~ ~ ~ ' ~ IC . < < . ~ - es UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Page 1 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. DS Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PDD/87-0104/W121-49/PUDP; PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 14605; PD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER ~~ PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 14492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER ~° " PD/89-0165/W121-49/TA 14606-14612; PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDF; PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 & 14452 i 14423; PD/89-0174/W121-55/PUDF. HACRGROUND: The University/Crest Planned Development, originally known ae the ...-.... they County o! V9an Barnardino~ for review in1May11 1988.mitDUring processing of the application, the City o! Rancho Cucamonga began efforts to annex the area historically known as North Etiwanda, within which this project site is located. At the applicant's request, processing of the PUD was subsequently suspended to allow processing o! a specific plan in a cooperative eltort with the City of Rancho Cucamongn. Alter unsucceselul attempts to reconcile the differences between City and County standards, the applicant chose to resubmit the proposal to the County fox review on June 1, 1990. The resubmittal included seventeen (17) tentative tracts and final development plans. The City is continuing to pursue their Etiwanda North Specific Plan while the County o! San Bernardino is currently reviewing a proposal !or a specific plan with the same title. Project Description: The project consists of one preliminary development plan, two master tracts with final development plans and fifteen (15) sunolemental tracts with final development plane. The components of the project include 1,239 single family residences, a 12.6 acre neighborhood commercial site, school site and two (2) parks; all oP which are allocated to the southern element of the project site, Seven (7) of the tracts (660 dwelling units) era located in the upper portion of the southern element and is commonly referred to as the "Crest" while the remaining eight (8) tracts (579 dwelling units) era located in the "University" or lower portion of the site. The minimum residential lot size is 7,200 square feet with the average lot size generally increasing from south to north. The concept involves ten (10) residential neighborhoods organized around two major "hubs". A "recreation hub", containing approximately 14 acres, is located at the northerly portion of the site and a "community service hub" of approximately 24.5 acres is located to the south. The "community service hub" would contain an elementary school, an 11.5 acre park, and the commercial site. The total proposed parkland is 25.5 acres. The average gross density is 3.02 dwellings per ~~~ UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Page 2 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. D1 Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS _ PUD/87-0104/W121-49/PUDP;~PRELZMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; PD/$9-0163/W121-49/TR 14605; PD/89-0164/W121-69/PUDFJ RASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 14492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER ,w .., PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-14612; PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDFi PD/89-0175 thrU 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 & 14452 & 14423; PD/89-0174/W121-55/PUDF. acre, with the open space preserve and the commercial site acreage excluded. The northern element, located off-site approximately three (3) miles above the area proposed for development, contains a 675.8 acre open space preserve. Existing Site Conditions: The northern element (the 675.8 acres) extenfla two miles into the National Forest Boundary and is characterized by mountainous and foothill terrain at the base of Cucamonga Peak in the San Gabriel Mountains. This rugged mountain area is comprised of high quality habitat and a variety of woodlands, chaperrnl and coastal sage scrub. Day Creek, a clear perennial stream, winds through Day Canyon and provides habitat for a wide variety of floral and faunal life. The southern 435 acres is located in a gentle alluvial plain which generally exhibits slopes at approximately four to eight percent (4t - 8t). vegetation on the southern element is dominated by mature and intermediate stages of Riversidian alluvial fan scrub, with a patch of chaparral and twe riparian washes occurring in the northeastern portion. Scattered throughout this southern element are non-native ornamental and agricultural trees and shrubs. The project site and surrounding area are generally undeveloped. the gortion oP the site proposed for development is bounded on the north and west by Southern California Edison utility corridors. Highland Avenue marks the southern boundary. The eastern edge of the site, south oP Wilson Avenue, is adjacent to Hanley Street, while further to the north of Wilson Avenue, the site is bounded by Etiwanda Avenue. Circulation in the area is generally limited to unimproved roads and trails. The development area is known to contain aggregate resources; however, the site ie not included in a Mineral Resource Zone. The site is surrounded by a seismically active region, dominated by the Whittier-Elsinore, San Andreas, San Jacinto, and other regional seismic features. The Cucamonga Fault, due to its proximity (1/2 mile north of the site) is the most significant, yet analysis of the trenching studies did not result in a need to revise the project. The project site is owned by three California Owns approximately 176 Creek Boulevard. Ths Caryn Company most of which is located north of remaining 675.8 acres are owned by landowners. The University of acres adjacent to future Day owns approximately 259 acres, the University property. The Etiwanda Highland, Ltd. In a ( C~/ UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVEIAPMENT Page 3 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. DS Icrio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-0104/W121-49/pUDP; PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; ' PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 14605; pD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 144921 PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-14612; PD/99-89-0162/W121-49/PUDF;"~" PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 16693-14498 & 14452 & 14423; PD/89-0174/W121-55/PUDF. separate agreement with the University of Cnlifornie, Etiwande Highland, Ltd. will exchange their 875.8 acre portion of the prof set for the University~s 176 acres. In order to accomplish the exchange, the applieant ie proposing a density transfer of 17 base units aaninnnA w.. «w.. .. recognition of the preservation ~of~this~signiticant epee space feature, the County General Plan permits a 2-unit bonus, resulting in a total density transfer of 19 unite. The conditions of approval require that the University grant the 675.8 acres in fee title to the County. The University will be granted permission to use the open space preserve as a natural science study area. The EIR originally included a mitigation measure that an open apace easement be provided to the County by the University for this acreage. The final resolution as described above provides an extra level of environmental protection for this mitigation measure. Environmental Impact Report: As a result of the initial study prepared for the original Caryn Company PUD, the County determined that a Focused Environmental Impact Report should ba prepared. The issues identified in the initial study included potential impacts to transportation/ traffic and circulation, climate/air quality, biological resources, land use/relevant planning, and cultural/historical resources. Tha University/Crest Draft EIR (SCHA 88082915) was prepared and distributed for public review and comment on January 18, 1989. Recommendations received from local, state and other agencies/organizations were incorporated into the proposed Final EZR. The EIR did not identify any project-related impacts that could not be fully mitigated below a level of significance. However, two significant cumulative impacts were identified, in the areas of climate/air quality and biological resources. The Environmental Review Committee, at Sts meeting on February 17, 1989, determined that the Final EIR was adequate and recommended certification of the document to the County Planning Commission. At the time the applicant resubmitted the application last Tune, the need for further environmental review was addressed. Due to both the time lapse between the two applications and to the adoption of the revised General Plan and Development Code, additional environmental review vas required to determine whether the Final EIR was adequate for the resubmitted proposal. A determination was made that an Addendum would be sufficient to ( C/ UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Page 4 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. Di Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-OlOd/W121-49/PUDPt PRELIMINARY DEVEIAPMENT pLAN; PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 14605; PD/69-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 14492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-14612; pD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDF;~~' PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 6 14452 & 14423; PD/89-0174/W121-55/FUDF. assure that the Final EIR prepared Por tY.e earlier project was adequate for the project now under consideration. The Final EIR, which evaluated a worse-case scenario, addresses the significance oP potential project-related impacts, while the Addendtm nrnv:aae -.: '.liva~ni iniormaclon to clarify the differences between the original proposal and the project presently being reviewed, which proposes fewer units and design modifications. The cumulative impacts to air quality and biological resources identified in the Final EIR are still identified in the Addendum as significant. No additional significant impacts were identified, nor was it found that impacts previously addressed would be substantially more severe in the resubmitted project than was previously indicated by the FEIR. A Statement of overriding Conaiderationa has been prepared to address the significant cumulative environmental impacts resulting Prom the project. A total oP sixty-four (64) mitigation measures were called out in bath the been incorpor tedeninto the conditioneo ofa approvalgd InTadditione a Mitigation Monitoring and Compliance Plan has been prepared. ANALYSIE: This project was reviewed by the Development Review Committee on August 8, 1990, and recommended for approval with the understanding that minor revisions would be made to the tentative tract maps anfl that certain issues would be resolved and the resolutions reflected in the conditions of approval. Thasa issues involved internal road standards, off-site road requirements, rewording of the fire conditions, revisions to the landscaping standards, as well as the need to respond to the comments received from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City's concerns focused on such Issues as inadequate review times, inconsistencies with the various maps and calculations, access issues, the provision of density bonus units for off-site improvements, minimum lot sizes, location and size o! the commercial site, poor quality of design and inconsistency with the City's General Plan and policies. In the attempt to resolve the outstanding DRC issues, new and more complex issues emerged involving the original traffic study, finance plan reports, phasing of improvements, the ncquiaition of off-site properties, letters of agreement from utility companies and affected property owners, and timing/consistency with the County's Etiwanda North Specific Plan. During the intervening months, numerous multi-department meetings regarding the /~-3 UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVEIAPMENT Page 5 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. Di Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-0106/W121-49/PUDP; PRELIMINARY DEVEIAPMENT PLAN; PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 14605: PD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55JTR 14492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER - PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-14612; PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDF; ~"'"~ PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 16693-14498 & 14452 i 144277 PD/89-0174/W121-55/PUDF. outstanding issues took place both with the applicant and amongst County eteff. The npplicant wee given the opportunity to return to the Development Review Committee for a tinal review and clarification o! the proposed changes and conditions of anmroval. Ii,e appiicanc cnose, lnatand, to proceed as directly as possible to the Planning Commission hsnrlnq. A meeting hoe bean scheduled !or May 21, 1991, to idantily and resolve, i! possible, nny outstanding concerns the developnr may have. Tha results of this meeting and any proposed modificntiona to !ha coed ltiona of approval will be presented at the Planning Commission hearing. Resolution of Issues: Traffic/CirculationlROad Tmnrovemen s Vintage Avenue: The City is requesting that Vintage Avenue be extended through the project sits to align with the existing portion of Vintage Avenue, west oL the project site. The County is requiring that Vintage Avenue be extended to the east boundary of the SCE Corridor and constructed to Collector Aoad Standards (66 foot right-of- way). Tha applicant agrees with the County~s proposed alignment, however they are proposing to construct Vintage Avenue to Local Road Standards (60 loot right-of-way}, and stop the road one lot before the SCE corridor boundary. In addition, the applicant strongly disagrees with the City~s request to extend the roadway across the Day Creek Wash to align with the already existing Vintage Avenue. Day Creek Boulevard Right-of-Way: The alignment proposed Por Day Creek Boulevard by the University/Crest PD is consistent with the County Master Plan of Highways. A portion of this alignment, from Highland Avenue to Vintage Avenue, is not contained within the project boundaries but constitutes an off-site improvement. To data, letters of agreement have not been submitted from the property owners affected by this proposed alignment. This alignment will require the removal of one residence currently occupied by the owners (SUdeta) who are aware of the proposal but have not responded to the applicants' requests. The owners of the three vacant properties to the north of the Sudeta family have also not responded. Tha applicant has been required through the conditions of approval to submit written agreements from these affected property owners prior Li7I4nR.++ITY/CREST PLANNED DEVEIAPMENT Pag6 6 Of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. D1 IoY1oJ/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUA/57-0106/W121-49/PUDPi PRELIMINARY AEVEIAPMENT PLAN; PD/89-016]/W121-49/TR 14605; PD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 14492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER ~~ PDJ 89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-146127 PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDFf~~~ PD/e9-D175 thru 0192/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 & 16452 & 14423: PD/69-0174/W121-55/PUDF. to the scheduling of this project for Hoard of Supervisors' hearing. Acquisition of all easements will be required prior to recordation of the master tracts. Day Creek Houlevard/W~~s^^ :~u,uo (L4th) Aligrnsent: The applicant 1s proposing a right angle configuration for the Day Creek Boulevard/Wilson Avenue intersection, rather than a curved alignment preferred by the City. The County TranspcrtatlonJFlood Control Department concurs with the applicant's proposal as it conlorms to the County Master Plan of Highways. The proposed configuration is supported by the traffic study analysis, and it is also preferred by 5CE that road crossings be at 90 degree angles through the corridors. The conditions of approval support the applicant's proposal. Etivanda Avenue: The City is concerned with protecting the local area residents south of Wilson Avenue from additional traffic. They recommend that Etiwenda Avenue not ba extended north of the Lower Crest collector Road and that Wilson Avenue be extended east of Etiwenda to Lhe east City limits. However, the county Transportation/Flood Control Department concludes that Day Creek 8culevard will carry the majority of the traffic and therefore the project traffic will not impact Etiwenda Avenue to the extent that Wilson Avenues need bs extended to the City limits. The applicant has been required, through the oonditions oP approval, to construct Etiwenda Avenue £rom Wilson Avenue north to the Tract/Planned Development northern boundary: Wilson Avenue shall be constructed from Day Creek Boulevard to Etiwenda Avenu@. Cul-des-sacs: The City is requesting that a 60 fool right- of-way be required on the cul-de-sacs in order to that the property line be adjacent to the sidewalks. However, the County Transportation/Flood Control Department is proposing that the Board of Supervisors approved standard M120, requiring a 50 foot right-of-way, with the addition of a 5' landscape, sidewalk and utility easement on both sides be required. The City believes that use of a sidewalk easement circumvents an underlying issue of density (the City standard would require large lots, therefore less units). The project, as conditioned, is required to adhere to the county ! ~~ UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Paga 7 of 14 CARYN COMPANY (J. Di Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-0104/W121-49/PUDP; PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; PD/89-0163/W121-d9/TR 14605; PD/89-0166/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER _ PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 144921 PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-O16S/W121-49/TR 14606-146127 PD/89-89-0162/W121-69/PUDF; PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 G 14652 0 14623; ` ' PD,~89-0174/W121-55/PUDF. standard N12o requirements. Tne praje~t, ^vaontiv designed, piaess equestrian trails, bike trails, the 14-acre parr, •.a eu.aa ~• `_!:e Summit Street park site, and portions of Day Creak Boulevard road alignmanta within or across the SCE utility corridors. To date, the response received trom SCE indicates that they have reviewed the proposal end have agreed that, aubjeet to further review of detailed final street and grading plans, the request to purchase rood and drainage easements could be approved. With regard to the proposed trail systems within their corridors, ScE has agreed to the use, on a "license agreement basis", with the appropriate County aganey. Thera has been no confirmation to data of a sales agreement between the applicants and SCE for any of the surplus land that is currently proposed for improved parkland. The applicants have bean required, through the conditions of approval, to obtain license agreements with SCE, where necessary, prior to recordation of the master treats. Parkland jMprovements. The applicant is groposing a total of 25.5 acres of encumbered and unencumbered improved parkland, which will exceed the County's current General Plan requirement of 3 acres par 1000 people, or 12.06 acres for this site. The applicant is proposing an improved 14-acre community park site within the area currently identified as SCE surplus land and an improvefl 11.5 acre park, of which 4.5 acres (proposed to remain as encumbered) are located within one of the SCE utility corridors. Both of these park sites are contained within Master Tract 14492. In the event that acquisition of the 14-acre property, to be dedicated as on-site parkland, is not possible, the applicant has been required by the conditions of approval to redesign the project to include provisions for on-site parkland. The applicant is not in complete ngreement with the requirement to provide all parkland on-site. ( ~~ VNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Paqe 8 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. DS Ioxio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-0104/W121-49/PUDP; PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 14a0S; PD/89-0164/W121-49/PDDF; MASTER PD/89-0173JW121-55/TR 14492; pD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDPt MASTER ~,,. PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-16612: PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDF: PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 6 14452 6 14423; PD/89-0174/W121-55/PDDF. 4. Infrastructure Financlna Phasing and Fair share Allocations This development is not presently within an established community Facilities District tconl. a .±._._-:c pia.-. 1- currently being prepared, to determinn the infrastructure costa and potential fees associated with a Community Facilities District. Facilities to be publicly linanced must be regional or backbons in nature. The finance plan will clarify which improvements constitute a public benefit to be financed by tax-exempt bonds or other public financing mechanism, and which are in-tract responsibilities of the master developer. To avoid fragmentation/phasing of the installation of regional or backbone infrastructure, the applicants ate required, through the conditions of approval, to bond for or construct all needed infrastructure improvements (sewer, water, roads, flood control facilities, etc...) prior to the recordation of the master tracts or the issuance of building permits for the subsequent tracts. If a reimbursement provision Se included in the public financing mechanism, the developer will be reimbursed Por any costs determined to exceed his fair share contribution. The developer strongly disagrees with the requirement for the master developer to bond or construct and asserts that all the necessary infrastructure for this project will be backbone or regional in nature, once the County's Specific Plan is adopted, thereby qualifying the improvements Por cFD or other public funding. The developer further asserts that any requirements for bonding and/or installation of improvements should be the responsibility oP the merchant builders who purchase the subsequent tracts. Timinal~onsistercv wi h County's OraP Etiwanda North sgecific Plan This project is contained within the boundaries oP the County's proposed Etiwanda North Specific Plan. During the processing of this planned development, it became necessary to determine whether it would be agpropriate for this project to ccntinue through tY.e County's development review process in advance of the approval of the Specific Plan. Since the draft Specific Plan was prepared by the same individuals who prepared the development plans for University/Crest, the architectural requirements and themes, ! ~~ UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Paga 9 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. D1 Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-0104/W121-49/PUDP; pP.ELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANE • PD/89-0263/W121-49/TR 14605; PD/a9-0166/W121-d9/PUDFi MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 14492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-16612; PD/89-89-0162/W121-d9/PUDF: ~,,,., PD/89-0175 thrv 0182/W121-55/TR 1449]-14698 fi 16452 & 1462]; PD/89-0176/W121-55/PUDF. landscaping standards, design criteria, and developmnnt standards are basically identical in both plane. Tha conditions of approval have bean prepared to ram.i,ra the project to pay a fair-share allocation for all backbone i.-. _ nen,_ ..w nrl.ur inxrascruczura anu i.u yo~:.c.pa.a ta`••-^ _ _._ _ asseesmente. Also, the project conditions of approval require this project to ba consistent with the aesthetic and design requirements of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, which may require re-design o! project elements found to bn inconsistent with the Specific Plan once it is adopted. Because this project is in the lower portion of thn Specific Plan sees, with access from Highland Avanue,.and is adjacent to the city limits o! Rancho Cucamonga, the continuation of public facilities will not be quite as difficult as it would be if the property were located in the northern portion of the Specific Plan area. Due to the fact that this planned development has been reviewed in concurrence with the Specific Plan and basically reflects the development standards of that Plan, and since the conditions require the developer to provide adequate public services and facilities in a timely manner consistent with the specific Plan, it appears to serve no useful purpose to delay this project until completion of the Specific Plan. Rasoonse to City Comments and Concerns County staff has made a concerted effort to respond to the in-depth comments from the City o! Rancho Cucamonga. Numerous issues have been resolved, soma o! which concern mapping techniques, design criteria, and project data to be included in the Preliminary Development Plan text, clarification of area calculations on the maps and in the text, landscaping requirements, enlargement of the commercial site, end agreement on equestrian/hiking/biking trail standards and locations. However, notwithstanding the spirit of cooperation between City and County staff, the City is still at odds with the project as it is proposed. Tha areas of disagreement include, but era not limited to, calculations of density, bonus density for oft-site improvements, lot sizes, lack of concurrence with utility companies and private property owners, failure to meet City planning and engineering standards, inconsistency with the t/~~ UNIVERSITY/CREST PL>1NNED DEVELOPMENT CARYN COMPANY (J. DS Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. RgGg~yg of 19 PUD/87-0104/W121-49/PUDP; PRELIMINARY DEVEIApMENT pL7~tl; PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 14605; pD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 14492; PD/89-0172/W12I-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-14612) PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/pUDF; PD/89-0175 thrv 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 & 14452 & 14423; ~ PD/89-0174/W121-55/PUDF. City General Plan and policies, and adequacy of the FEIR and the Addendum. A number o! the disagreements arise lrom baai r. ,ii rye..-........ r.e~.. _ ...~ Count ~s-~' o~~~ `°~Ly policy. For example, through the denait fcplaannad development process, the maximum gross Y y given site, ae delined by the County General Plan, may be clustered or translerred into specific areas. The County General Plan permits bonus densities under certain circumstances. Staff has determined that the proposed project meets the criteria sat forth in Section 88.0515 of the County Development Coda !or the provision of bonus densities, because the 675.8 acres proposed as an open apace preserve is a publicly valuable resource and provides additional open apace beyond thnt required by this section of the County Code. Bonus densities ware not calculated Por areas not under the control o! the applicant (i.e., the surplus Edison land and public utility corridors). The County~s planned development policies also allow Por the provision of mixed land uses (i.e., a combination of residential and commercial) within a single cohesive plan. Furthermore, the City~s General Plan designates a portion of the site as open space which, according to their development standards, would require the applicant to file a General Plan Amendment with the City for the proposed commercial site prior to approval by the County. However, the City would preler this area to be kept as open space, to provide a buffer for the Fourth Street Rock Crusher operation located west o! the site. This area is currently being proposed to remain as open space under the City~s version of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, making the subject application inconaiatent with the City~a adopted General Plan and also with the City~a proposed Specific Plan. Although the City~s density designations Por portions of this area are comparable to the County~s current designations (without a bonus density provision), the City~s minimum lot size requirements are vastly different than what the applicant is proposing. City standards !or lots within this site range from a minimum of 8,000 square feet to an average oL 22,500 square feet. Rancho Cucamonga~s Hillside Development ordinance would further minimize the density while increasing the lot sizes to allow for contour grading, building orientation, etc... ~~~ UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Page 11 Of 19 CARYN COMPANY (T. D1 Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-0104/Will-49/PUDP; PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; " PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 146051 PD/89-016d/Will-49/PUDF; RASTER PD/89-0173/Will-55/TR 144921 PD/89-0172/Will-55/PUDF1 MASTER ~~ PD/89-0165/Will-49/TR 1d606-14612; PD/89-89-0162/Will-49/PUDF;~!"'~ PD/89-0175 thru 0182/Will-55/TR 1dd93-14498 & 14452 fi 144231 PD/89-0174/Will-55/PUDF. In an effort to cooperate with the City, the npplicant agreed to revise the Tentative Tract Maps and Preliminary Development Plan text to require a minimum 7,200 square foot lot size. originally, the 7,200 square foot requirement was ' '---aaya~~ auu many of the lot aizea proposed wore below 6,000square feet. Despite this revision, the City continues to take issue with the fact that the lot sizes do not increase substantially enough in the Croat area, the area is not intended for (and does not have adequate square footage to accommodate) equestrian boarding, and linally the lot sizes do not reflect tho Hillside Development design standards. The City has envisioned executive-level equestrian eatatse in the Crest aren with an aqueetrian staging area in place of the 14-acre park. In addition, the linear design layout o1 the project is inconsistent with City policies requiring greater use o! curvelinear streets, Pascoe, and open space areas within each tract. They would also BrePer, at a minimum, that the County's underlying two (2) unit per acre requirement be applied to the Crest area, thereby reducing the unit count. The total allowed density for this project will be established upon approval oP the Preliminary Development Plan for this planned development. The approved density total for the project site will be reflected in the county specific plan, once adopted, thereby establishing consistency between the approved total density for this project and the density specified by the specific plan. Strong opposition has been expressed by the City concerning the adequacy of the EIR and Addendum addressing all of the issues concerning the resubmitted project. The City advocates that the impacts of the subject proposal should ba evaluated in conjunction with their Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Also, since the draft Final EIR was not certified, the City asserts that an addendum is not sufficient and that a supplemental EIR should be prepared. Their reasoning focuses on the fact that the University/Crest project description has changed, a significant period of time has elapsed since the preparation of the document, that significant events have occurred since the original draft was circulated, and that additional cumulative impacts have been introduced by the approval of development applications in the vicinity of the project. The County determined that ~3b UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Page 12 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. D1 Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-0104/W121-69/PUDP; 3RELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 14605; PD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 14492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0165/W221-49/TA 14606-14612; PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDF; PD/89-0175 thrv 0182/Wi2i-55/TR 14493-14498 6 1dd52 6 14423; PD/89-0174/W121-55/PUDF. there were no new signilicant impecta identified, and theralore an EIR Addendum was sufliclant to address the revision proposed by the current project. In an w*1n.nvV ~.. -d_rc~~ '' ~ issu~a raisec by the City, the county has required the applicant to: 1) provide landscape easements as lettered lots, resulting in a reduction in density from 1,293 to 1,239; 2) provide letters of agreement from thn utility companies and affected private property oumers prior to scheduling the project for Board hearing; 3) bond for or install necessary infraetrvetura! and 4) pay a Lair-share allocation for o!f-site improvements. In addition, the applicant has been required to redesign the project in the event the proposed parklnnd acreage cannot be acquired. Responses_Irom Affected Probertv Owners The Sudeta family owns a parcel adjacent to the proposed alignment of Day Creek Boulevard, on the west side. Mr. Sudeta expressed concern regarding the impact to hie property resulting from the widening oP Day Creek Boulevard. Ha discussed hie concerns about condemnation, relocation and/or reimbursement, and timing of improvements with County staYP. Mr. Sufleta was advised that in projects such as this planned development proposal, it is normal for the County to request letters of agreement between the applicant and nny property owners affected by the acquisition of necessary right-of- way. Through the conditions oP approval, the applicant to required to provide written confirmation to the County prior to scheduling o! any Board of Supervisors hearing. It was also recommended to Mr. Sudeta that ha contact the applicants himself and negotiate arrangements to the satisfaction of meeting his family's concerns. Fourth Street Rock Crusher is currently leasing a portion of the Flood Control property adjacent to the Day Creek Wash area. Mr. Norm Johnson, of that company, has expressed concern regarding the extension of Wilson Avenue through his project. Wilson Avenue would divide his property, thus hindering the trucking of materials between the south and north portions. A proposal to construct en at-grade intersection at the existing access road was not acceptable to Mr. Johnson, ha believes it would be hazardous due to the 1 ~, UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Paga 13 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. D1 Iorio)j UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/e7-0104/W121-49/PUDP7 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANT . PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 146057 PD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF7 MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 14492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-146127 PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PVDF; .~~-~ PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14493 6 14452 6 144237 PD/69-0174/W121-55/PUDF. 84 existing truck grade, signalization of the intersection was not an eceeptable alternative either. Mr. Johnson prefers an undercrossinq or overcroesinq. The original County approval of Ehe Fourth Street Rock Crusher project, YO T.i Ana raF1.... i.. ....a.r1.... «a..~ _ ofWilson nAvenue. Mr. Johnson is agreeable-to-this,-it~his concerns can be satisfactorily resolved. This planned development, as proposed and conditioned, is consistent with the Planned Development requirements as defined in Section 88.501 of the San Bernardino County Development Code. It is also consistent with the intent and the development atandarfls of the Preliminary Development Plan text. Tha recommended conditions of approval address the potential project-related impacts assessed in the Environmental Impact Report, reducing the majority to a level of non-significance. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared to address the two significant cumulative environmental impacts resulting from the project. Ae conditioned, the master developer is required to coordinate, bond for or install public services such as roads, water, sewer, school, and fire facilities prior to the recordation of the fifteen subsequent tracts. By the approval of the finance plan, a public financing mechanism shall be established to fund the required backbone infrastructure, and the development ie required to participate in said mechanism. FINDINGS• PRELZMIN pY DES PMENT P aN/W1 1-49 Tha Environmental Zmpact Report prepared for this Preliminary Development Plan (SCH $88082915) in August, 1989, and the Addendum prepared in May, 1991, adequately discuss the impacts of the proposed development and indicate that significant cumulative environmental impacts will result in two (2) categories. In approving this project, the Soard of Supe rvisore is adopting a Statement of overriding Considerations. The proposed Preliminary Development Plan is consistent with the County General Plan because thn proposed lanfl uses are consistent with the PD (Planned Development) Land Use District of the General Plan since the design incorporates the clustering concept and preservation of open space required 1~3~ UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVEIAPMENT Page 14 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. AS Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PDD/87-0104/W121-69/PDDP; PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANT PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 146057 PD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF7 MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 144927 PD/99-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-14612; PD/89-99-0162/W121-49/PUDF7 .~-°~ PD/a9-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 14497-14498 S 14452 i 144237 PD/89-0174/W121-55/PUDF. by that district. In addition, adequate provisions have been made for the maintenance and management of the common open spaces and any common facilities. TMa eifo fn,• •ha nv_nnna a,i Aaval nnwnnr ie_ a.a-.... -_~_.. /.. ..i ... and shape bacauso all required open epac'n, setbacks, landscaping, and other design standards as proposed in the Preliminary Development Plan and as required by the County Development Cods have been provided. Tha site for the proposed development will have adequate access lrom Day creek Boulevard, a proposed Major Divided Arterial via Highland Avenue (future Route 30) because the conditions of approval require the developer to bond for or install the necessary improvements prior to recordation of the master tracts. The proposed Preliminary Development Plan has been reviewed by County staff and conditionefl to ensure an adequate circulation system for future traffic needs. Adequate public services are required to ba provided by the Conditions of Approval and the Preliminary Development Plan which specify the proposed distribution, location, extent, and intensity o! major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the Plan and needed to support the land uses described in the Plan. Provided these conditions are met, there will not ba a reduction of public services to properties in the vicinity which would be detrimental to public health, safety and welfare. 6. The proposed use will not have a substantial adverse effect on the use of surrounding property and will be compatible with the surrounding area because the conditions of approval and the Preliminary Development Plan text will require appropriate development standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses and that the necessary services and improvements will be provided. 7. The improvements required by the conditions of approval and the manner of development adequately address all natural and man-made hazards associated with this project because all concerns regarding any serious drainage, fire, circulation, ~~3 UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED AEVELOPMENT Page 15 Of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. Di Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/67-0104/W121-49/PUDP}.PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN} PD/99-0163/W121-69/TR 14605; PD/89-0166/W121-49/PUDF} MASTER PD/69-0173/W121-55/TR 14692; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-146127 PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDF; '~""" PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 16493-16699 & 14452 6 146237 PD/99-0174/W121-55/PUDF. slope, and seismic hazards have bean considered by the Development Review Committee in the compilation of the Conditions of Approval. The Dro_ooewfl Anvelnmm~nf _....~?_~ fOr ---- Giaivieu~ use of the land and for nn ixcallence of-design greater than that which would be achieved with conventional development standards because the proposal implements the planned development process, allowin4 greater flexibility in design, more eiiicient uas o! the land, mixed uses, to include residential, commercial, institutional, and open space, within the tramework of a single cohesive plan. In addition, the Plan speoitiaa the standards and criteria by which development will proceed and standards !or the conservation, development and utilization of the area's natural resources. 1. These tentative tracts are part o! the University/crest Planned Development (PD/W121-49), analyzed in a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR/SCH 1)8@082915) Addendum which adequately discusses the impacts of the proposed developments and indicates that significant cumulative environmental impacts will result in two (2) categories. All mitigation measures identified in the FEIR and Addendum have been incorporated into thn conditions of ap royal for these projects or have been imposed on these projects. in approving these projects, the Board of Supervisors is adopting a statement of Overriding Considerations. The proposed maps, designs and improvements of these subdivisions are consistent with the General Plan, because the land uses, densities and locations of development are consistenC with the Planned Development (PD) Land Vse District since the design incorporates the clustering concept and preservation of open space required by that district. in addition, adequate provisions have been made for the maintenance and management of the common open spaces and any common facilities. 1~~ UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Page 16 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. D1 Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS POD/87-0104/W121-49/PUDp; PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; - PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 16605; PD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 144927 PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF) MASTER PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-14612; PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDF) ~~'~'~ PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 6 14452 fi 14423; PD/09-0174/W121-55/PUDF. The Bites are physically suitable Por the proposed types and density of development, because all concerns regarding drainage, Lira protection, slope, seismic, and other natural and man-made hazards associated with the site era adequately -. --- -----.-..-.... ..oo~yue auq uau ugRglLlqnB OI approval. 4. The proposed aubdiviaion designs and improvements era likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment including fish, wildlife, and their habitat because, although the FEIR and the Addendum required for this project determined that project-related impacts to biological resources could be fully mitigated, and all appropriate mitigation measures have bean applied, the FEIR identifies biological rasoarcea as a eigniiicant cumulative impact. It daterIDlned that the lone of fan scrub habitat would be regionally significant after mitigation. A Statement of overriding Conslderationa, addressing this issue, has been prepared and must be approved in approving this project. 5. The proposed subdivision designs and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems, because adequate public services such as roads, sewers, water supply, and fire protection will be provided, and because potential drainage, geologic, and Gros ion hazards associated with the vitae are adequately addressed by the subdivision designs and the conditions of approval. 6. The proposed subdivision designs will not conflict with public easements within or through the site, because the conditions of approval require that public rights of easement will not be interfered with, and that statements of concurrence be provided from utility companies whose easements may be affected by proposed development. 7. The proposed subdivisions are deemed to ba land projects, as defined by County Developmank Coda Section 812.12030. e. The designs of the subdivisions provide, to the extent feasible, passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities to each of the proposed lots as identified in the County Solar Design Guidelines, which era on file with the Clerk of the Board. l ~3 ~~ UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Page 17 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (J. Di Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-0104/W121-49/PUDP; PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; - PD/89-0163/W221-49/TR 14605; PD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR 144921 PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDFT MASTER - PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-14612; PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PVDP; -~°^~ PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 Z 14452 6 14423; PD/89-0276/W121-55/PUDF. FINDINGS' FINAL DEVFiAPMFNT PT aNA FnF mnF 1. Theca linal development plane are part of the University/Croat Planned Development (PD/W121-49), analyzed in an EIR (8CH wuu uiaii) nuQ uuuav wiaiuaa auwyuncr1y Q1sCLLefei LRe lIDpaCLB OL the proposed developments end indicates that significant cumulative environmental impacts will result in two (2) categories. in approving these projects, the Hoard of Supervisors is adopting a statement o! Overriding considerations. 2. The proposed final development plans are consistent with the General Plan because the proposed land vase are permitted by the Planned Development (PD) Lnnd Use District since the design incorporates the clustering concept and preservation of open apace required by that district. In addition, adequate provisions have bean made for the maintenance and management of the common open epacas and any common facilities. 3. The proposed final development plans era consistent with the requirements of the University/Crest Planned Development (PD/W121-49) because the proposed prof acts, as coaditioned, are consistent with the standards and intent of that planned development. 4. The sites Por the proposed developments are adequate in size and shape, because all required open space, setbacks, landscaping and other design standards idantiiied in the Preliminary Development Plan are provided or have been conditioned to be provided in a timely manner. 5. The sites for the proposed uses have adequate access because public access will be provided by Day Creek Boulevard, a proposed Major Divided Arterial via Highland Avenue (future Route 30) because the conditions of approval require the developer to bond Lor or install the necessary improvements prior to recordation of the master tracts. The projects have been reviewed by County stelf and conditioned to ensure that the proposed circulation system will safely accommodate the increased traffic generated by these projects. 13,E UNIVERSITX/CREST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Page 18 of 19 CARYN COMPANY (S. Di Iorio)/ UNIVERSITY OF CALIF. REGENTS PUD/87-0104/W121-49/PUDP; PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; - PD/89-0163/W121-49/TR 14605; PD/89-0164/W121-49/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-D173/W121-55/TR 14492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF: MASTER -~ PD/89-0165/W121-49/TR 14606-146121 PD/89-89-0162/W121-69/PUDF:~ PD/89-0175 thru 0182/W121-55/TR 14493-14498 6 14452 6 14623; PD/89-0174/W121-55/PDDF. 6. Adequate public services are required to be provided in a timely manner by the conditions of approval. Provided these conditions are met, there will not be a reduction o! public services to properties in the vicinity which would be detrimanM 1. fn ~..~-.110 ..0:... ,~, aa~a~y and Welrare. 7. The proposed uses will not have a substantial adverse attect on the use of surrounding property and will ba compatible with the surrounding area because the conditions of approval will require appropriate development standards to ensure compatibility with the surrounding land uses and the necessary services and improvements will be provided. 8. The improvements required by the conditions of approval, and the manner of development adequately addreBe all natural and man-made hazards ansocintefl with these projects because all concerns regarding any serious drainage, tire, circulation, slope, and seismic hazards have been considered by the Development Review Committee in the compilntion of conditions of approval. 9. The proposed developments provides for a more eitieient use of the land and excellence of design greater than that which would be required under conventional development standards because the proposal implements the planned development process, allowing greater flexibility in design, more efficient use of the land, mixed uses, to include residential, commercial, institutional, and open space within the framework of a single cohesive plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the planning Commission recommend that the Board of Supervisors A) APPROVE Preliminary Development Plan W121-49 for 1,239 residential units, 12.6 acres of neighborhood commercial, an elementary school, two (2) parks and open space on 1,111 acres; B) APPROVE Master Tentative Tracts 14692, 14605 and Tentative Tracts 14452, 14493, 14494, 14495, 14496, 14497, 14498, 14523, 14606, 14607, 14608, 14609, 14610, 14611, 14612 (sequential tracts) and related Final Development Plans, subject to the conditions of approval; ~Cl UNIVERSITY/CREST PLANNED DEVEi^PS~t.T Paga 14 of 19 CARYN COMP!!{Y ~3. Di Iarioj/ UNIVERSITY OP CALIF. REGENTS PUDj87-0104/W121-49/PUDP: PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANT - PDj89-0163/W121-49JTR 14605; PD/89-0164/W121-69/PUDFj MASTER PD/89-0173/W121-55/TR~16492; PD/89-0172/W121-55/PUDF; MASTER PD/89-O1b5/W121-49/TR 14b06-14612; PD/89-89-0162/W121-49/PUDPY' PD/89-0175 thrv 0182jW121-55/TR 14d93-16498 i 14452 i 16d23; PDJ 89-0176/W121-55/PUDF. C) ADOPT the findings contained in the atatf report; D) CERTIFY the Environmental Zmpact Report and Addendum; E) APPROVE the Mitigation Monitoring Plan; F) ADOPT the :~~:emenc of overriding Conaiderationa; and G) FILE a Notice of Determination. ATTACI3MENT5: Official Land Uae Diatrict Maps; Preliminary Development Plan Land Vae Map: Master and Supplemental Tentative Tract Maps; Final Development Plan Mape; Conditions of Approval; Letters from City of Rancho Cucamonga dated 6-6-90, 1-11-91; Addendum to EIRr Statement of Overriding Conaiderationa; Mitigaticn Monitoring Plan; Preliminary Development Plan Report; Letter from Land Plan Design Group dated M.ay 16, 1991; Appendix to the Preliminary Development Plan Reports Environmental Impact ReportjInitial study. ~~ 8 CONNENTH 8Y CITY 8TA1F - ON THE CODNTY PLANNING CONMI86ION BTAFF REPORT DATED MAY Z1, 1991 .. a, ~. COIDIENTB REVISED S/29/91 City Staffs Comments are presented item by item under County Staff Report headings and following "comment:". BACKGROUND' rn__..~. w v-i ..l^-_'- _ _ _ -;:y<<,uuu in wni. i.iie subject project is in the-City of~Rancho Cucamonga~e Sphara- of-Influence. Because, ae stated in the County General Plan, the County~a goal is to "encourage cit iea to annex urban unincorporated areas with designated City Spheres-of- Influence and support annexations/incorporations of urban designated lands" -- and even if the subject project does not annex to the City, it will impact City infrastructure and services -- because it is north of the City and the University parcels adjoin portions of the City on the east. Prgiect Description: comment. Major components of the project are off-site. Exist ins Site Conditions: (See Existing Conditions Map, City's draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan: Exhibit lA.) ComRSnt: It should be noted that: * The subject project is not contiguous to Highland Avenue, but begins approximately 600 feet north of Highland Avenue, separated by a number of parcels under a number of ownerships; • Tracts in the City have been approved, or are in process of being approved to the north, east, and west of the University site: (see attached Exhibit 2, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D); • The C;ty~s adopted Red Hill Fault Study Zone crosses the subject project in a north-east to south-west diagonal approximately in the vicinity of the proposed school site: (see attached Exhibit 3); * Two USGS blue line streams cross the project site; + The project has been reviewed by the City~s Planning Commission and the City Council, and the City does not object to the proposed transfer of development rights /~/ from the 675 acre enclave within the National Forest to the developable property owned by the University of California. _ ~• * The City opposes granting a density bonus in addition to granting a transfer of development rights. Also, analysis by City staff indicates that the 675 acre site is not developable and is not in danger of urbanization (see attached Exhibit 4) regarding the ultimate ownership of the 675 acre site, City staff ie recommending that fee title for all enclaves within the National Forest ultimately be transferred to the noLionai COre6t; F,Dvironmental Impact Reyort: Count: Zn the opinion of City staff, the following project level impacts have not been mitigated to a level of less than significant: * Traffic impacts to the City of Rancho Cucamonga; * Park Impacts to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (see additional discussion under Parkland Improvements); * As indicated by the development plans, closure of the two existing blue line streams is proposed and therefore, mitigation required by 1601/404 permits is unknown, therefore this item has not been mitigated to a level of "less than significant"; * Impacts related to the City's Adopted Red Hill Fault Zone Seismic Study Area which were not adequately addressed in the project's seismic studies. Comm~at. The following cumulative impacts have not been adeq;~stely mitigated: * Loss of Alluvial Fan Scrub habitat which can be partially mitigated by acquisition and improvement of AFS habitat within Day, Etiwanda, and San Sevaira washes, and potentially, as identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife services and the California Department of Fish and Game, vegetation on the alluvial fan north of the upper power line corridor and east of Day creek; * Cumulative impacts of traffic and circulation on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's circulation system are addressed in the Conditions, but no mechanism is specified for transferring funds to the City; * Cumulative impacts of other infrastructure such as police services are not addressed: for example, according to the City's Etiwanda North Specific Plan, J ~~ COMMENT_5 RE: MAY 23, 1991 COUNTY STAFF REPORT May 29, 1991 Page 3 the City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department is best able to respond to calls for service; current police service ie provided by the County Sheriff's Chino Hills Division and services era paid by the county General .~,,., Fund; further under current County tax exchange policies upon annexation police services woulfl be transferred to the City, but funding would not be transferred; therefore existing County policies hinder annexation because of the burden of the cost of police services when an area is r.~nexed into the City; * Other cumulative impacts ~<lataa ±~ implementation of the County's Etiwanda North Specific plan an+i Environmental Impact report which is in process and/or the City•e Etiwanda North Specific Plan antl Environmental Impact report, also in process. towant: in the opinion of City staff, the decision to complete an addendum to the draft final EIR for the subject project was incorrect and a "subsequent EIR" should have been prepared and circulated for review. This is so, because the intent of CSQA is to "inform the public" of potential impacts; because changes in the application era more than "minor" due to the amount of improvements identif iad on adjoining properties; because an EIR had been completed, but the project was not approved prior to resubmittal of the application in riay 1990; and because cumulative impacts and oppert~+niti.es for mitigation ware increased when the r:tiwanda North Specific Plan was filed in February 1989 in the City and in May 1991 in the County, and now must be fully addressed (Public Resources Code Section 15163 and 15166). ANALYSIS: Comment; Many substantive issues remain unresolved at this time, including but not limited to those identified by County staff: * Location and design of backbone circulation system for Etiwanda North on which adequate access for this project is dependent; * Fiscal Impact Report for Etiwanda North Spacif is Plan nn which this project is dependent; * Infrastructure Fhasing Plan for Etiwanda North Specific Plan on which this project is dependent; * Consent of adjoining property owners for off-site acquisition and improvements for this project; and ~4~~ COMMENTS RE: MAY 23, i991 WLTiTY SIAFF kL'PORT May 29, 1991 Page 4 * Timing of project implementation in conjunction with Etiwanda North Specific Plan on which this project is ~'~ dependent. comsat: In addition, City staff identifies the following substantive issues which remain unresolved: * Biological mitigation measures for this project in the context of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Resource Management Plan, including a comprehensive strateav for uui.n i::ing state uepartment of Fish and Gama 1601 permits and Army Corps of Engineers 404 permits; and # Adequate park acreage. Resolut+on of Issuoa• 1. ~a ff is/Circulation/Road Imorovem n (See Circulation Map, City's draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Exhibit lB .) vintage Drive: Comment: Tracts 13835 and 13812, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga have been conditioned to construct Vintage Drive as a through collector street with 66 foot right-of-way. The County conditioned Tract 13875 on the west to build Vintage Drive as a collector with 66 foot right-of way. The County also conditioned the Caryn Planned Community to construct Vintage Drive as a collector. The pavement is 42 feet wide instead of 44 feet wide, and one radius curve is BDO feet, but according to the City Engineering Division meets the lower end of acceptable collector standards. Neither Caryn Elementary School or any residences front of Vintage Drive. To be consistent with past actions, the County should condition Vintage drive to qo through the subject project, construct a bridge across Day Creek Channel to link with Tract 13835 and construct the link east to Tract 13812 in order to complete the links to the aforementioned residential developments. (See Exhibit 5.) Day Creek Boulevard Right-of-wav: 9om~nt: Have the affected property owners bean notified of these hearings? Dav Creek 8oulevardlwilson Av nue Alignment: com~nt: Technically the Day Creek curve remains in the City's General Plan until there is an application for amendment to the General Plan, or until the City~s Etiwanda North Specific Plan and related General Plan amendments are / '! C42LYENTS RE: NAY 27, 1541 CS}ON'Ty STAFP REP4R May 29, 1991 Page 5 adopted. The Day Creek Curve appears to be no longer an issue, because City staff has analyzed the Etiwanda North ~,, ,,, traffic study prepared by Austin Faust and recommends the Pour-way intersection. Etiwanda Avenue. comment: City staff proposes that in order to protect the historical quality of Etiwanda Avenue as provided in the City~s General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan, that the proposed east-west collector street adjoining the SCE lower utility corridor. (Sae Exhibit 6.) Coaaent: In the subj act project plans, the alignment of the aforementioned east-west collector does not appear to give adequate access Por development of a portion of the Southern California Hdison property. In order to give adequate access for development, City staff recommends a different alignment of the east-west collector and Day Creek Boulevard. (Sea Exhibit 7.) Cul-de-sacs• Covent: Since the project ie in the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere-of-Influence, the City Council and City's Planning Commission request that City Standards for development be conditioned by the County for the subject project. This request is related to actual project density which would be reduced if the 60 foot City right-of-way standard is used. concurrence with utility companies: Comment: Many off-site improvement for the subject property have been placed on Southern California Edison's fee easements. (See letter to Pat McGUCkian, May 16, 1991.} There are 5 oddly shaped pieces for a total of approximately 55 acres of SCE surplus property which are surrounded by the subject project. Uses for all of this property should be planned before approval of the subject project. (See Exhibit 6.) Some of this property appears suitable for residential development. The subject project proposes to use a portion of one piece for drainage facilities, with no use specified for the remainder. The largest piece, approximately 36 acres in size, is well suited for public purposes. Of this largest piece, 14 acres are proposed for park use as Bart of the subjec*_ project, with no use specified for the remainder. In order to qualify as unencumbered park, the 14 acres must be purchased in fee and dedicated to the County. /~3 CGMMENTS RE: i~fAY 21, 1.991 WI7.NTY STAFF R$PORT May 29, 1991 Page 6 Although the site is well suited for recreation purposes,.. the City's Park and Recreation Commission has not identif ied~ a neighborhood or community park need at this location. However, they have identified a strong need for an equestrian boarding and training facility in mitigation for loss of equestrian lot sizes within the Specific Plan boundaries and recommend this site as an appropriate location for such a facility. Therefore, the City's Specific Plan proposes to request that at least 25 acres of the property, with first phase facilities, be dedicated in fee Mr 46e _ ..l i..~.. a.. _ ' ~ n-- a`_ ~"' ~ ~ IiV1111 JElCU111C Ylan IOI use as an equestrian boarding wand training facility which would be operated by a concessionaire. The City's Specific Plan also proposes that the small triangle of land opposite the site be dedicated as a trailhead facility. As to trail use on SCE land, SCE has informed City staff that the use of existing service roads for trail use is discouraged, and that it is doubtful if trails in the vicinity of existing power lines will be approved until the Electro Macnetic Field controversy is resolved. As to park and landscape use, SCE has informed City staff that landscape materials on SCE leased land is restricted to small trees (maximum 15 Eoot mature canopy width) and that no permanent park facilities would be permitted. Parkland Improvements: (See Open Space and Trails Plan, City's draft Etiwanda North Specific Flan, Exhibit iD.) Co The City strongly supports County staff in requiring that the park requirement meet the Quimby Act standard and be contributed by the developer on the project site, with the understanding that this condition may mean redesign of the project. The City currently provides a ratio of 4.7 acres of parkland per 1,000 population, therefore under the Quimby Aet, the City is entitled to request 4.7 acres per thousand of unencumbered park land. City staff is in the process of updating the park requirement in the General Plan and in the City's Etiwanda North Specific Plan to conform to this entitlement under the Quimby Act. The update is expected to be complete in 1991. Since the subject project is in the City's Sphere-of-Influence, 4.7 acres per thousand population of unencumbered parkland should be provided by the applicant. In the past, the County has conditioned park fees rather dedicated parks for projects expected to annex to the city. There have been six piecemeal annexation, of which three have received development approvals in the County. Ey the rppp.~ENTS AE: MRY 21, 1991 i.GLT7T't STAFF AEPGAT May 29, 1991 Page 7 time the fees era collected there is either no land available to purchase for parks, or the cost of the land is '~ more than the fees collected, or both. Also, the City~s General Plan policy provides that in a planned development context, parks should be contributed by the applicant. Therefore, dedicated parka should be contributed !or the subject project. if 1,239 units are approved, the applicant should contribute 15.7 net acres of unencumbered park. Tha City standard for a neighborhood park is a minimum 5 e VL UIICIIIiUIYIJtlI'tl(1 land. M unencumbered park is owned in feec free of easements, and is relatively Plat. The subject application includes 7 acres of park on the project site. Of the 7 acres, a portion of the site is encumbered by a utility easement. Tha net yield is approximately 5+ acres of unencumbered park. Landscaped areas on public utility easements are seriously encumbered, not only because the park use is expected to be lost when the easement is used for intended utility purposes. Also, park uses are restricted in terms of park facilities and landscape materials allowed. Leased/licensed utility easements should not be included in the minimum park acreage. Therefore the 4.5 acres adjacent to the Summit Avenue park should be counted as a landscaped lot, and not as park acreage. As proposed the 14 acre park on SCE surplus land is a large neighborhood park, not a community park, by City Standards. In order to qualify under Quimby, this park must be purchased in fee and dedicated in fee to the County. if the SCE site is not available a minimum of to acres oP unencumbered neighborhood park should be dedicated in fee to the County for the Crest portion of the project. Finally, the subject project does not appear to include a mechanism for ongoing park maintenance. A park maintenance district, separately or part of another maintenance district, should be included in the subject project. 4. Infrastructure Financing Pha ins and Fair ~harg Allocations. Comment: City staff supports the contention by County staff that infrastructure should be constructed as part o£ a backbone system and not be the responsibility of merchant builders. However, City staff does not agree that this is a stand alone project which can proceed the infrastructure plan and financial strategy of the entire Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Health and safety issues require that a major portion of the backbone circulation system be designed and /~5 CD.'2!ENT~ RE: MAY 23, 1991 CDL'NTY STAFF REFDRT May 29, 1991 Page 8 constructed to provide access to all 15 tracts, and the .. backbone system must first be determined by the Specific~~ Plan alignment and possibly the Specific Plan's financial mechanisms. At present, no infrastructure whatsoever exists on the subject project site. Further, the integrity of the Planned Development is fragmented by division into 15 tentative tracts, S for the University property and 7 for the Crest property. Piecemeal development on a Tract-by-Tract basis [.i: i:.i ..vusu uu i.ivu ui li,e naclCnon¢ ClrclllailOn SyeteID would create the potential Por inadequate emergency access in an area of high fire and seismic hazard potential. Therefore, for the subject project, the Infrastructure Plan, Phasing Plan, and Fair Share Allocations are dependent on the Etiwanda North Infrastructure Plan, Phasing Plan, and Fair Share Allocations, umbrella plans. Further, costa and reimbursement agreements are dependent on resolution of major design issues, for example final alignments for arterial and collector streets. 5. T~mina/COnaistencv with County's Draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan. See Land Use Map, City's draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan, (Exhibit 1E.) C • City staff strongly disagrees with the statement by County staff that "it appears to serve no useful purpose to delay this project until completion of the Specific Plan." For example, please refer to our comment under Item 4. aesoonse to City Comments and Concerns. Comt•at: We would like to compliment County staff for their efforts to respond to City comments. Many differences have been resolved, including but not limited to, enlargement of the Commercial site, agreement on a four way intersection for Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue, the extension of Hanley Avenue, and a stand alone school site and stand a).one park site in the vicinity of Summit Avenue. Many differences still remain. Also, new issues are surfacing with the review of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and Environmental Review for the Specific Plan. Not the least of which concerns the project's design. The subject project does not really conform to City policy direction from the City Council to increase lot sizes along the north/south axis of the Etiwanda North Spacif is Plan area. / / COlLNENT3 RE: PfAY 23, 1991 CGUNTY s'TAFF REPORT May 29, 1991 Page 9 The original University/Crest concept plan contained~~ curvilinear streets consistent with City policy, but thtr' current design is a tight grid design. City staff has prepared an analysis of the design. City staff has also prepared a recommended design concept far the University portion of the subject project, emphasizing curvilinear streets, and interior paseos. (See Exhibit 9, 9A.) (Note: Since the conceptual study was prepared, a four-way intersection has replaced the Day Creek Curve in the City's draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan.) Further, since the subject project is within the City's Sphere-of-Influence, the City Council and City's Planning Commission request that City Standards of Development should be followed, including but not limited to the Hillside Development Ordinance, and Design Review standards. comment As County staff has noted, the existing City General Plan identifies the entire University site as open space. (See City General Plan Map, City's draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Exhibit 1F.) The reason for the Open Space designation is not a proposed addition to a Chaffey Regional Park. The Open Space designation respects the 1976 acquisition of the University property as one of 26 sites comprising the University of California Natural Reserve System, which provides "scholars with the opportunities for scientific research, education, and training that are essential to our understanding and wise management of the earth and its natural systems." City staff agrees that with urbanization of the Etiwanda North area and the channelization of Day Creek, it is doubtful that the sensitive Alluvial Fan Scrub Habitat which covers the project site could 6e preserved. Also, it is not necessary to keep the site as open Space, because a buffer exists between the Rock Crusher site and the development, including an elevated berm, a wildlife corridor, two SCE utility easements, and the concrete lined Day Creek Channel and paved and unpaved service roads. Therefore, City staff is recommending approval of a City General Plan Amendment to change the land use of the university site and a portion of the Crest site from Open Space to residential use. However, until the City initiated change is adopted and adequate mitigation measures provided, approval of the subject project would be premature. Covent: Regarding minimum lot size, county staff responded to part of the City request. The City's request was for increasing lot sizes along the north/south axis of the project, with a minimum 7,200 square-foot and average 8,000 square foot lot size for the University site, and a minimum 20,000 square-foot and average 22,500 square-foot lot size for the portion of the Crest site which is identified on the /yJ COMMENTS RE: H_;y yJ, 1951 COUNI'y STP.FF P.EPCRT May 39, 1991 Page 10 County General Plan map as Res-2. In June, 199D, the City Council adopted a Resolution-of-Intent to prepare at1~' Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and in November, 1990, adopted a Resolution-of-Intent to amend the City's General Plan to provide consistency with the Specific Plan. The City~s position now is to request that nll lots on the Crest site be a minimum 20,000 square-foot and average 22,500 square-foot lot size. Further, Citv staff ..r~..e~c t::c :,,,,~ uui••ce-sac right-oP- way proposed by the subject project and supported by County atatf, because it increases the density by 103 for most of the project, in effeet granting a 203 density bonus to the applicants. count: Regarding overall density, the City opposes granting two incentives for preservation of the 675 acre National Forest site, specifically opposing the density bonus, but supporting the proposed Transfer of Development Rights. City staff opposes granting a 103 density bonus for "good design" for the subject project. Further, the findings for the 103 density bonus are unclear. on the one hand credit is given for the 675 acre site, on the other hand credit is given for "good design." However, the design of this project only meets the minimum design standards of the West Valley Foothills Plan. Further, it meets only the minimum design standard of the County's Etiwanda North Specific Plan. If proposed off-site improvements are removed from consideration the subject project does not even meet the minimum standards of the County's Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 9ecause no agreements are in place for the aforementioned off-site improvements, there future existence is questionable. The question must be asked whether this project is going to set a precedent for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan or whether this project is going to be granted a special privilege in relation to other projects within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Since County staff hes stated tF.at no additional density bonuses will be given under the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, can it be concluded that awarding a density bonus for this project would constitute granting special privilege to the applicants? Coemant: Regarding the EIR and Addendum, in addition to a lapse of time, substantial new information is available which must be evaluated. Specifically, isn't the application for a Specific Plan including the subject !'OMMENTS AE: MAY 2 , 1991 OOL7:TY STAFF kBrGRT May 29, 1991 Page 11 project substantial new information? Uoesn't the Etiwande ~~ North Specific Plan introduce cumulative impacts which~~~ cannot be adequately addressed until the Etiwande North Specific Plan's EIR is approved? Further, the EIR does not adequately address the impact of the loss of Alluvial Fan Scrub Habitat which covers almost the entire project site. Is it sufficient to say that there is a regional impact which cannot be mitigated, when in fact, through a Resource Management Plan for the entire ""- - ;:..,.w 6ynuiiic rian, the impact can be partially mitigated? Comm~at: Regarding the effort by County staff to resolve soma of the City's issues, County staff has made a commendable effort. City staff supports most of the conditions of approval as set forth by County staff, as steps in the right direction. However, as stated throughout these comments by City staff, until an Etiwande North Specific Plan is approved, further development approvals within the Specific Plan area is premature. This position is not taken lightly. It reflects recent City experience in piecemeal annexation of five Planned Developments. Piecemeal annexation include a total of 530 acres, involving approval of 1,117 dwelling unite for an overall gross density of 2.65 dwelling units per acre. The 530 acres was included in the Consortium's Etiwande North Specific Plan application to the city, February 1989. City opposition to additional piecemeal approvals prior to adoption of the County's Etiwande North Specific Plan, also reflects the City's preparation of the City's Etiwande North specific Plan, which serves as a pre-zone for annexation. Resmonsea from Aff d P ogerty Owners. Comm~at: Most of the amenities offered by this project, as well as key elements of basic infrastructure have been planned offsite. Consent of affected property owners has not been received. It should be noted that the subject application was first submitted to the County in July, 1988, and ample time for property owner contact and consent has been available. It should especially be noted that no agreement with SCE has been achieved for the several planned uses of SCE property. The letter from SCE, May 22, 1991, invites the applicant to enter negotiations, but is far from an agreement. Also, should SCE be willing to license 14 acres of their 55 acre surplus property for park use, this would constitute a high risk for long term park status, and would be opposed by the City Por park credit as encumbered land. ~~ C4MM.ENT3 RE: MAY 23, 1991 C....riTY STAFF REPORT May 29, 1991 Page 12 SUMMARY ~~" " comsat: City staff does not believe that the proposed project is consistent with the County Development Code. One inconsistency is that two methods of incentives are proposed for preservation of the 675 acre Open Space site within the National Forest. City staff supports only the transfer of development rights incentive. However, it should be noted that according to the County Development Code, a condition y~ei cyuiaite w i.rnusCer of development rights is that Che parcel moat be developable. The proposed transfer of development rights ie clouded by the fact that it is extremely doubtful if the 675 acre site can be developed Por residential use. There is a flood control easement over the southern third of the property. There is no paved or unpaved road access to the site. The Bite is in the high fire hazard zone (safety review level 2) of the County. The site is primarily on s?opes in excess of 30 percent, which would potentially be subject to slope failure. Slopes less than 30 percent are subject to flooding and under the flood control easement. Two means of access would be required, and providing two means of access to the site which is surrounded by the National Forest on three sides would be virtually prohibitive. Further, National Forest staff has indicated to City staff, that recreational use is discouraged for the National Forest adjacent to the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence, because of the high fire hazard and because of the proximity of the wilderness area set aside for protection of Big Horn Sheep. For that reason, the City's Specific Plan will state that no formal trails or roads should extend beyond the historic Day Creek gaging station. Since Forest Service policy allows informal access, the City's Speeif is Plan will state that informal access should be allowed to the upper Day Creek preserve, but that a mechanism for control should be used such as a permit system for use. Such use has not been considered in the University Crest draft final EIR, nor in the addendum, and therefore an environmental assessment should be made before such use is further considered. Because field inspections show that upper Day Creek canyon is fragile and Chat accessible portions are limited in size, City staff opposes a County recreation easement for the Day Creek preserve. o~ig><. City staff requests that the project request for a 10 percent density bonus be denied by the Planning commission. co Regarding the Environmental Assessment, City staff believes that the EIR and "Addendum" do not adequately address all the project related impacts, in that the seismic study did not study the City's adopted Red Hill Fault Zone /~ COlLYEHT.S RE: 24AY 23, 1S31 COLriTY STAFF REPORT Hay 29, 1991 Page 17 which runs near or through the summit Avenue school and park .. site. A condition should be added to require aeismic.~~~ investigation of the proposed school site. Also, City staff believes that the EIR and "Addendum" do not adequately address cumulative impacts of the project and cannot adequately address the cumulative impacts of the prof act until the Etiwanda North Specific Plan is adopted. Further, mitigation measures identified are not adequate, i,wiuuiny uui. noi. limited co, nioiogical and trafrlc mitigation measures. No mitigation is recommended for the cumulative lose of Alluvial Fan Scrub habitat which can be partially mitigated through a comprehensive Resource Management Plan and such a plan will ba a part of the adopted Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Also, mitigation for off-site traffic impacts to the City of Rancho Cucamonga is inadequately mitigated. ~yndinga Preliminarv Deve~ooment Plan: comm~at. In general, comments are general and not specific, because City staff has not had an opportunity to complete review of the revised plane and conditions of approval. co However, based on preliminary review, City staff concludes that all the findings cannot be met. 1. The EIR and addendum do not adequately address all the impacts. see comments above under "summary." 2. The proposed Preliminary Development Plan is not consistent with the County~s General Plan, because the Plan hinders and does not further annexation of the proposed site which is within the City of Rancho Cueamonga~s Sphere-of-Influence. 3. The site is not adequate for the proposed Planned Development as attested by the fact that so many amenities and infrastructure are planned off-site. 4. Because the developable portion of proposed site is in a fire hazard zone (safety review level 2), two means of access must be required; therefore, the Day Creek Boulevard Access by itself is not sufficient and a second means of access must be complat~d, including but not limited to, the extension of the northerly east/west collector to East Avenue. 5. Adequate services are not provided, because the backbone circulation system does not provide adequate opportunity for development of parcels which are not a part of this application. /~/ COMMENTo RE: MP.Y 23, 1991 C9?SNTS +TAiF REFORT May 29, 1991 Page 16 6. Tha proposefl use may have an adverse effect on the use of surrounding property because of the amenities and ~~ infrastructure planned off-site; because there is not ~~~° adequate provision for development of certain parcels; and because this project may be granted privileges which era not granted other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the project is situated. Also, the intensity of use is higher titan planned for adjoining property; therefore, the proposed use may itnvu a ua Li ln.6.'.t11 LffIIa _.. _____.^Ainn 7anA assn. The Conditions oP Approval do not adequately address all natural and man-made hazards, including but not limited to, adequate means of access. S. The project design is substandard in the content of adjoining projects in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and if all ofE-site amenities are constructed and/or provided, the project only meats the minimum standard of the West Valley Foothills Community Plan and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. inns: Tentative Tract commmnt: Comments on these findings must be deferred until there is sufficient time to complete review of the revised plans and the County's Conditions of Approval. Final Development Plan: cosm~nt: Comment on these findings must be deferred until there Is sufficient time to complete review the revised plane and County's conditions of approval. Conant: City staff requests that the Planning Commission recommend denial without prejudice for the subject application. Further, in recommending denial, City staff requests that the Planning Commission direct the applicant to complete additional environmental assessment and project redesign including, but not limited to the following: To resubmit the application following approval of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan; To provide a seismic study of the school site in conformance with seismic policies of the County's General Plan and with the adopted Rancho Cucamonga's Red Hill Fault Seismic Study Area; /~~ COlMENTS nS: M_4Y :3, 14S1 COANTY SmecF REFCRT May 29, 1551 Page 15 * To provide adequate mitigation measures for traffic impacts on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's circulati~dll' system; * To provide adequate mitigation measures for the cumulative loss of Alluvial Fan Scrub habitat; * To participate in biological mitigation measures consistent with the Etiwanda North Resource Conservation Plan which will be adopted as an environmental m;rtr._.±c- wc~s~~c ui cne Etiwanda North Specific Plan; * To design the project consistent with the Etiwanda North Resource Conservation Plan policies; * To enter into an agreement such as a Memorandum of Understanding with the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to participate in a comprehensive 1601/404 permit plan for the entire Etiwanda North Specific Plan area; * To redesign the plans with no density bonus units consistent with the County Development Code policy to grant only one public incentive for preservation of open space; * To redesign the project to be consistent with the adopted Etiwanda North Specific Plan which will establish the backbone infrastructure system, the backbone financial plan, and financial mechanisms for improvement and maintenance of the background infrastructure system; * To redesign the plan with curvilinear streets and internal pasaos in conformity with the County's General Plan policy which encourages preservation of natural contours to preserve slope, riparian features, and viewaheds; * To work with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to design the background circulation system to protect Etiwanda Avenue, consistent with the County's General Plan Policy LU-9; * To cooperate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to redesign the background circulation system to provide access for all developable parcels of land, consistent with the County's General Plan Policy LU-9; * To work with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to redesign the landscape plan consistent with the city's xeriscape Ordinance, the Etiwanda North Fire Protection Study, the Etiwanda North Resource Management Plan, and the /53 CDM!lEH2'S RE; NAy 23, 194i COUIiTY STAFF RE?ORT May 29, 1991 Page 16 City of Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda North Specifie Plan landscape palette, consistent with the county's General -~ ~ w. Plan Policy LU-9; * To meet all requirements oP the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Development Code, including the Hillside Development Ordinance, consistent with the County's General Plan policy LU-9; * To acquire additional property in order to provide 4.7 ----- ~ _ ~M_.-vA _~Y 'wn~ rh nn awnA nnnbll1t 100 Oa- sitayor~ redesign the proposal tracts, consistent with the County's General Plan Policy LU-9; + To acquire agreements to lease and/or landscape SCE and MWD Pae easements for trnils and landscaping uses, or to provide all trail and landscape ausnities on-site; * To provide property owner consent to plan the oPP-site portion of the school Bite; and * To provide property owner consent to acquire land !or the backbone circulation system, drainage facilities, drainage easements, temporary access easements, and/or to bond for condemnation. In conclusion, the City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to provide additional comments should the need and opportunity arise. /~~ Front Llno Fin poW ~ VACANT LAND - NATIONAL FOpEB~~ ~~ °°~~ ~, }EalAlln 8prkgt ~rdmYlGwk ~7// ' Maw Grti -_~Ay Cr k CAOnm ~'_:i~i~i:if/ -- /~~ i ~ ELkfriq .. ~0 QMIWIdYq ~% l = pAaMM Two NOTH oM ~ Svn~\ ___ _ RMgN SUllon SNO ~, \ .~: ~ ....-:-. .:y ~: :•:. Srn . ~ :..,: .1. .. ...,...,v _.._. .... __ °waer .... .. i .t. ..... „-~~. ..:...~:( _ r INT. IL~ -. iU}. ~..'../rwD mlN /'~ / r-J 1Vrb. woowrr n•xw.~i wvrw b wv1~o cunmorq. TI PWlhps~oourq - ~«.. ""'~`°'°"`""""'"°"'"' Originai Poor Quality O rrrJ.r n...... w.. d.....r.. - /~ EXISTING CONDITIONS AND USES ~5 S rEtiwanda North Specific Plan t Gtr d Rarrckn f rronA~ EXHIt51T iA i~>~ ~/ ` `~ _ T 'Original Poor duality `t`. _'~. = I -- t-- r--~ . -- -_-~- .~._ _ _ ~Y..------~. t.. ... -- - - .... -~ --. e. _- t ~ - ~I - -~ ~ ~. ._~ . i -- I _ :: i - - ----- I -- - ~ 1 - ~ AA Ai At I t .wam+vew t vx.~.n ~~ ~ I ~ _' _ . ._-. ~e I ~ J _ . 11 SN a.«.,. 6]r ~oer+o eo_..~ w.n a,.~n. w ~~ Atapr Divided Arterial Al TYpeal Section •••••..® A/OM eowwa o.ea. ataeoa ...... Spacial Divided Saeondery Arterial ~r.am r«.r t«amo.r Cara ena> _,._, ~ i i ! ~, : SxoraYrY Nterlal - - wron+r.ar twnoa M.r ' - aFran+.ann ~yq. ear Gar eoulaaara ' - awry+..ar ~~~~ Gc11eC1d e.a.a m.. ma..a. tivar wawa Dora +vraara ewu rbae &aann •.x. sur Awn. •9an SawM aw loan av.an CIRCULATION PLAN ~~ Etiwanda North Speci~fic~Plan I 1 '~. (rlr or /~/ Rancb l w+.oaR+ l/`/', ~YI-~ 11311` { ' To Gapuq Station ~ •re,erer saver a~.• / e.rrr r,.r u.. r.. nr i ~~°"yap ~~v ..l Wni!w __-__ - M~a1. e~, ml,yi. •~ , . • - LEGEND o.we er.r. ®GP~r+SWCa +r Mplpfai Tnil • Community Equntrbn Tnil ~. I J i ' ~~ ~. ••~ • Necormientletl lkgerpese ' Bicycle lane aa.wr.o..n _ Bicyeb PeM Mw.wq.orp ~~/ , T Trail Hektl Iss~ P/B PHk/lepeW aurc ry.pw .yw..p... y...~wpr ti~w ~,r W l..ee.e ee. ee..xM. Tp. eeel.ew a..e. r r rerawe e~ • e.er.w µ~aew ew.rr a. yrw..er rr. w w eaf eee n.. swx a.uin r~--~ /5~ ~Etiwanda North Specific Plan ~!. f urr u ~unrko c.r..o..p. £XN+13/7' I +~ ~.~ ... dM~ i y,l~et_ ~~ b11m _~ ~ , ~ 1 J LEGEND L Io.OMMYRWOMxW IT~g1lAC1 ~ IWYIw OMWIY IYMMMMW I<2 W/KI n~ Mry la. Mw4w.W EWbII W//LI NMMY.NrIM1iMW Iv WIMb aM~ala. W.) bY,1. MMYOMMW Falab ((/ W/NM MWOItM av.l fC Flme tanMd IIC VWry Canbo, ~~0.~. M MuirutWW P= Rauh lab pC MNaMC. Caiwwaan Mw 1MC) MWmnmMrobwcW T n.n..e nr x..M E rrq.rM eM,nMbn r.eMly g .b..... ltMq Lb ~ P M1M/I..M M w. P a.MIMMM 4N f MAIL n.... +........~..... yr ..... w uur..u b...,. n wr . wry ..ac., ... ~.. w.. o-.... LAND USE PLAN Y--~~'°~°°' ~~ rEtiwanda Norlb~ Specific Plan ~~ /y 1 L 1,1. w ~Rawb f r.rmRa/ CXtiIB~T ~ .E' ,-- os - (- v . L-I Fl;/UC ~ .... t- - _ - i ^_.~ _.. ____ ._- i FL/UC -~~'>~ ~W Wife .`.. ~r ---~ - - os rr irrn I ~:,a-~-- -+- y~ arr mi v r' C xv.o _ w~ -~~ --__ _--- L ~~ ~~ _ - '~ OS W~~~-'~ ~~ ~ + _ __ MYMM __ LEGEND Eegte Resitlentiel o-r au./~c (EtMrorge SPeclec PIaN Very Low a ov~~c Law >r ovuac LM Low Medan ~aaV.i~c FL/UC Flood CaMrd/Ultliry Corridor Neipl~ewPOOd ColrVnerdel YMlbide RaidMttwl caoV.r~c ExietMq Sohoole P Exietinp grlu OS Open gWMCe CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMa ~~ .-. o': s (J / ~Etiwanda Nwth~ Specific Man I ~' t Gr. d ~lawcno C...owRa ro v to rDt rD vtc rovto ro Rst vs.a roves roves rtr _ rout roast G RiiT rw - ~NIYE1ttR>r - =_ _ -~, .•.' .. .•.• •••~ • • ~...+/ rotno_ cwt ?T -' _ roan _, E TT I~fi '_ sro ' n - ~ e -_- wa~+.m Me... -~ _.- ._ _ ... . IPGEND urnE. xu,•wrai nlr~,c. mp..np m. w,a ro 1/AO n 1 DU/~0 ACRES ~,. y.y,.~m,~.pN.,n.na.y. amuy rot/10 =t 00n0 ACRES >w..Mwiprra res. ro 1/7.6=1 W/ZA ACRES ®wewny w•wouuy.mrw ~o wucro Cueamap ro 1/1 . t DU/t ACRE !W FboAwAY ro 3H = Z DUIi ACaE w InefOUtronAl ro 7It = ] DU/t ACRE ro PlAnraa Mwlopmeaf ro s/ t = ~ Iw/ 1 ACRE ~ Si1g10 Rwdn1Nl RE 70M = ]0,000 SO. FT. 11Rl. (wl Infaaed IIIffIIVtiOMI Oesiytalion LOT SIZE © N~NaI SRS ..,® ,. ~,:,, 4MYp !4 w~. ^~ w I ~iww ~\ I•,IL +-{ -' 1-- F}-I~ i . ~ / / ~ EXHIBIT Z ~~ ~0rg na~l~Poor duality v~~~ 2 ,~; ~lac,rtsrv/ . i ~ D~ - REIN/3E0 io-i9•BB _T,~,,ycrA/c. 13D35 ~• ~ C .ti+r ' i i : My .~ I ' y'~T: 't ~i. i ~~ F, 411 ~.t..,~+7. ~, ~~,fi~. , IM~.1y V +r .: ., .~ •y - .. 1`x"1 _.. _ .w _i r-...~ ~ ~.. ~. i. t ii'.,'I v yl ' ~~~~r. w.~-.. 1 ~i ~~~~~~~ ~~i h I ~ i ~ ~.r--............ ' w. ..,,,-..... ~x_ ~ ~ TENTATIVE TRACT No. 1381 ~ __ ,:~_ .. ~~ m rnv a •~ww 3.Lsvr1--. rw~wrgA~~e~~~fl~\ M94e'Y 9! ~T.~ M ~~~-...:. 7`nr 3i.a,.... ~"' -~:,~~ ~ " : ' A ` ° • Y Ci. 7:_/. a~w~y.`%'r t:. .C: . na a . . ""~ :s~~=- 'Ong l Poor Qkla{ity -- _ _ ~'-' ~:-"rte.' ~ r -r• 9. .._ , ~ , ~ ~ - . -_~, ~ - 'r' - ~ - .. , 3 ~~ ,.~.L - __. _ .y~ _ ..;.~a,1 , :~. . . o vu •~ +n a ~~~~ - ~ ~ - r-- ~ C • L~ _ Y ~~ ` ~~ ~ - c s.~u. ~~~ iG^+L47. s- ~ •' ~ f : ~~~•~ `_;~ ._. ~~ ~ . ~'t. rr ; __ =. ~ it ~ ~.rf:•:u -.. ........ ~ 4 . .. - - r EXHl81T2B \•, ~~ _~ ~! n Q ;` ` h\ ~~~~ M ~~< h ~. z~ Q\ /~.3 ~~i~ I -,1 ~ ,, I~ 1, I ~~~ ilill jl i i il) ~~~t ,I 11°I ,~ ,~ ~!I ~IIII`: ~i .s i , f i II~ I ~j ~ .,..., , ;;I I I~ ~ ~ , II!!1 'Eiji ii :' ~,lill: s I I ,t i p ! j I II~Y ~ III! I1:1'«a'~y~ll~ll al I~~~ i~~ l ly: l ; l Illnllllll ! II;:11~ I 1t ~ ~ ~ ,I I ~ ~ ) ~ ~• ' , ~ ` } it I ! 11 ! ` ,, y f I~ ii ill III ., C ,v LI y 0~ 1 .~ 1 7 f' W _~ s ~Q MI/~l \'/I ~' ~+ r~g ,a 0 V Zv ~o Uv as ~~ F- ~ W ~ >' ~~_ Q ~ F- _ Z E- WZ F- - n ~~ t f '~ ~ ~o ~ ,~; ~ ... _ ~ ' ~ ~ y ,~ ~ ~ ~Sl i `'~1 ~ M I ~ I ~ `Jy • i (I 1 ~ 1 1 i~ ~ ~i ~~lil~i,~~~. I I~~~~I~rl±;l EXHIBIT 1~ /~/~ }W~ }~ J ? - R iC Z ~ .. ~ ~~a ~~o - ~ Q ~~~~~ N 'Ori~in~! Poor C~alifi. ~ ~ q ~ I I } 8 ~ ~_ J ~. Y ZONE i1BIT3 .~..___, t r.. s~s.a Aar. wagn~ao ov.n~o.c. . .. .• . , VI ~u~7Ytit~p P0.--.L'F'E~ OPFN 5%MCc f OEVF3DA01i AIlA rno...oa ~, n / ~P~ . ~ cieuyrq $~on frooacanra• . . EwnwiM •` , '1' • ` ~1 DAY CREED, ,~ -- -- OPEN SPACE PRESERVE EXH~B9T t.~ ~ a ~ - ~- ~ z E Wd ~ W .a yanv ~ ~ ~i ise3,1 ~ _ ~~,,~ { ~ ` _ ~ ~r - ~. _ ~ .. -~y~ antl epuen'+l13 ~ ~~ ~~ ~ i , ~ ' . ~, ' r I L' I - , d m ~ E a- r-1 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ;~ ~; "~' ~ f ~ v Y ~' I ~ ' _ _L p~enalnog ~ ~_-,_;r_- i _T~_, , ~i :a: ~a~sayaoa ~I ~~~~~~~~ ~'' N ny ~~ ua8~~~~W ~:,,~,~ _,~--< _: ,- ..~~. ..;mow __.:~. _ VINTAGE DRIVE ALIGNMENT EXHIBIT s ~ . .. !~ I 1, '~ ~i I ~I ~ I > a ~ m c i I let _ i ~ N I ~ •. ~ ut re S:R: Etiwanda tdorth Specific Plan LEGEND ~ Major Divided Arterial -Day Creek Boulevard ^~~~~~ Special Divided Second •~Ison Avenue (east of Day Clt; Secondary Arterial •Wilaon Avenue •Etiwanda Aver -Milliken Avenue -Upper Day Cq -Cherry Avenue ... ~ Collector -Banyan Street -Rochester Avr -Vintage Drive •Wardman BWi -Summit Avenue -East Avenue -San Sevaine •Caher Loop Sr CIICV~S.~-~t-pN 1SSV~S FXNi:.I?6~~ srn<r< er<, - sneakAntm~ _-- I~ ~a C7' Io G~ r~ m v V uiVe'Ri ?~ SGE 54R9L VS S'T'' PQ9 PeR7v //Q ±SS~acRE-s C 't" I EXNi 6/T ~_ '~rig~n~t Foot ~aa1;tY _~ / 7v EXl~IT~ _ ,\ ~ ~. g, ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ::fit ~-~ 1 ~~ , ,. iKa Ir~~I IV1~ ''1U ~~ '~ r.~ ~CAA ~P ~~\ ~~ ~~ r° ~ ~ ll l~Jl~~ ~~~ ® EXF~IT~ A T' sY F F L~ . ~~. ~ ~. , .7, ABSOLUTION N0. ~ / / L'~G~ A RESOLUTION OF TNB CITY COUNCIL OF Trffi CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING TNH SUFFORT OF TFIH SAN - BEANARDINO COUNTY HOARD OP SUPHRV ISORS HBr.ATIVE 'N TH6 '~"^' CITY ACTION6 TO ANNB% THB BTIWANDA NORTN 6pHHRB AABA. WNERHA&, the City has always maintained that our Sphere-of-Influence is vital to the welfare of our community becnuae of geographic location, inter-connection of drainage, circulation, topography, envirwsmental and service relatlonshlpai and WHEREAS, the City desires to foster the expeditions and logical annexation of Bald 6phere-of-Inf luencei and WHEREAS, the San eernerdino County Hoard of bVpervieote ha6 expressed Sntereat in fostering improved sub-regional and local cooperation in planningt and WNERBAS, the opportunities are not present to amble a coordinated approach to land use and development in the Spheres and WHHAEAS, the City desires rnnaisteney in development patterns and regulations between the City's Sphere-of-Influence and the City? and WHEREAS, the City feels that the dichotomy between County and City development regulations, policies, and standards encourages developers to play one against the other, therefore, frustrating any amexation attemptas and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to ensure environmentally, as well as economically sound planning for the Sphere-of-Inf luencei and WHERBAS, the annexation of said Sphere la a key factor to the successful moderation of density, use oP compatible development standards, eoozdination of infzasttucture facilities and ultimate development of the area. W~6A8, tae Citl and the Comte Lave been corking toarard tea coaaaon goal of ercallmcm is plaanlag for the City •e spears-of-Iaflaesce, am moat recently demmatrated ap preparatim of a Citp Etiaraada WrtL Specific plan snd a Comte etivaeds brtL Specific pLn. NON, TNERSFOR6, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 7. The City requests the cooperation and convent of the County in annexing all County-owned land within Rancho Cucamonga's sphere-of-Influencer ( ~~ CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. BTIWANDA NOATN SPNER6 AREA June S, iii Pn9e 2 2. The City requests the Board of Supervisor's support ~~ for the City's efforts to ennez the remainder of '`"" its northern Spheres 3. The County grant to the City, through a cooperative agreement, review and proceeding of all planning and development proposals (with nll requisite proceeding fees} witRln the Sphere-of-Influence, while hewing the County zetain its approval authorityi 4. Tha City urges the Board of 6uparvisors to adopt n position that all developaent althin the Amcho Cucasongn Sphere-of-Inf luance be required to follow and edhera to all devalopmem standards and policies o! the r_ity of RaneRO Cucamongai and 5. She eeerd of Bepervteele eens4dar a 99-4iB dny saspenaten of deve4epfen! epp44eel4erte 4n ear Bphere-ef-lnf4aenee M eneb4e the prepar p4enn4nq end eeerd4nee4en of pe}4e4ea helreen the 84ly end the 9esnlTr end !he! a leeM4ee4 eea4!!ee eeapr4eed of 84ly end eennl7 daft he ereeled !e eladr ame. 6. the Soard of 8eper•LOta omsider a auapamim of developamt approvals and Proeeaaln9 in the City •s Sphere-of-InLlmnce notil the Cowty•a Etiwaada aorth 8psciflc pLa is adopted. l~3 The Ceryn Company Pas(O(Lce Hod 9716. R~. Lgqune, CA 926'7-0216 Once (i l4) 499-5om fA.C (714) 499-5t 73 May 16, 1991 M1I r. Rober[ D. Mickelson, President Robert D. Mickelson Planning Consultants, Inc. 328 No. Glassell Street tlranve. (:A A9fififi-aG89 Re: Past Misunderstandings Deer Bob: You asked me to reply to certain comments that were made by Mayor Stout and/or Rick Gomez in your meeting last night. I've listed below the statements from Dennis/ Rick as [understand them. My responses follow: 1. Victoria was approved by the County and the City had to accept it; it cost the City 3750,000 to recoretruct Victoria Park Lane to City standards. Response: Victoria was approved by the City of Raneho Cucamonga; Victorifl Perk Lane was designed to pre- serve a "rural" character in an urban setting, similar to Palos Verdes Drive. Extensive discussions were had at the City Planning Commission and City Council level before the design was approved by the City. The decision to rebuild Victoria Park Lane with concrete curb and gutter was made after recommendation by the City's Engineer, based upon per- ceived drainage problems. Since this decision was made during our State's five year drought, the importance of the perceived drainage problems, compered to the original community character objective of Victoria Park Lane, could be discussed at some length. 2. The Caryn Developmeat (at Milliken k Highland; AKA Vintage Higldands) A. The County approved the project and the City had to accept [t even though the City had et:pressed specific dissatisfaction with elements o[ the project. Response: The project was processed in the County by eg, eement between County and City Staffs. Concurrent hearings were held in the City during the County's processing find during these City and/or County hearings, both Mayor Stout (the. Chairman of the City's Planning Commission) and Larry Henderson, Sr. Planner responsible for coordination of City/County actions on this project, spoke in favor of the project. B. Both Banyan and Rochester are Incomplete. Response: The only reason there is any Banyan at WI is because of Caryn's insistence that the City needed a parallel route northerly of Route 30 for City-wide circulation purposes and volunteered to spend 53,200,000 building a road, Banyan, that was not needed for the Caryn project itself. It was agreed with City Staif et that time that Banyan might become a two land "parkway" with a wide median aisle for aesthetic purposes, shoWd the County Flood Control District properties north oP Banyan develop. Under those circumstances, the District would improve the northerly half of Banyan. Should the District properties not develop, then just the southerly two lanes built by Caryn would be sufficient to handle through traffic and would not induce development north of Banyan. 'Fhe County requirement to build et least one-half of Rochester was agreed to by 9t r. Robert D. ckelsan Pest Misunderstandings May 16, 1991 Page Two Ceryn and sufficient funds were made available to the City end the builders of the` Caryn project (KhB and Marlborough) to complete Rochester as required. I under- stand the City spent the funds somewhere else. C. Caryn Park was never built because it was too small end because of insufficient funds were provided by Caryn. Response: The Caryn Dilorio Memorial Perk was specifically designed for the needs of the residents of the Caryn project. The design was reviewed by the City, and the improvement cost estimates were approved by KkB, Marlborough end the City. I know the park was never built. in hart. herance ti.P ~~r,~ ane the school district would not agree upon a Joint Use Agreement, but I do not under- stand why the money (now with accrued interest in substantial excess of 51,000,000) collected by the City for Caryn Park, has not been commited to a different park loca- tion. i've offered to both the Ci[y and the Caryn project residents to help relocate the park on the north side of Banyan. D. Ceryn School is Overcrowded. Response: Ceryn School is overcrowded only because the school district has been forced to bus students to Caryn School from other parts of [he City where ttie District's school neetls have not been met. Tlie Ceryn School is named in memory o[ Caryn because her family donated the land for the school. That financial donation allowed the school to be built, in comparison to inadequate provisions elsewhere in the City. 3. City vs. County A. City doesn't know what Jon Mikels' agenda is. Response: How can anyone doubt the importance of the long term interests of Rancho Cucamonga to Jon hlikels: Perhaps the same question should be asked of other individuals. B. City is not interested in the annexation of Etiwanda North it it's designed to County standards, and the City wants more of the avaBeDle feu dollars than the County is willing to give up if the area annexes. Response: Mutually exclusive concepts. In either case, a majority vote of the landowners controls the situation. C. The City is justifying much of it's current actions on the possibility of a City- led annexation of Etiwanda North. Response: The City attempted annexation of Etiwanda North apparently before Council members realized that LAFCO Isw requires the concurrence of the landowners. In any case, the current City Council has not legally discussed it's position regarding the annexation end; or development of Etiwanda North. D. City vs. County Design Standards. Response: The Mayor said he thinks County standards are deficient. Yet until your meeting this past Monday, he apparently under- stood the density of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan to be 40 percent greater thar, it is. If the hlsyor is in error on this basic element, perhaps he is also in error on some of the more subtle standards. The City's own EIR states there is not a significant difference between the City and the Consortium's ENSP. E. City vs. County Parkway and Entry Standards. Response: While comparisons between County and City standards are conceptual until construction occurs, the existing development of 24th Street/Wilson/Summit does make a graphic comparison. Everyone apparently agrees the north side of the road as designed in the County is more attractive then the south side of the road as designed in the City. The City maintains it's the developer's fault; the developer maintains it's the City's Ceult. Tlie City's argument is logically inconsistent if indeed the City controls the design process within the City. Mr. Robert D. Mickelson Past Misunderstandings Mey 16, 1991 Page Three i ... F. City va County Flnmetel Standards. Response: The Mayor says that in the City, design comes first and Pinences later. Current growth manegmant efforts at the County says that economics and environment go hand In hand. The Etiwenda North landowners consortium agrees end believes that it's irresponsible to produce a master plan covering 6,000 acres and over 5100,000,000 in public improvements without insuring that development is environmentally sensitive and fiscally sound. Rob, I hope this clarifies some points. Cetl me if you care to discuss further. Yours trWy, J eph N. Dilorio resident dND/jas INITIAL SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ~,,. .. LAW ENFORCEMENT REPORT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS COMMITTEE GARY CHRISTIAN OF COMMONWEALTH ONITED MORTGAGE, CHAIRMAN -AACRGROUND- The Rancbo Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce undertook in the Autumn of 1990 a study of the June 1990 Heias 6 Associates Law Enforcement Delivery Systems Aeport currently being studied by the Rancho Cucamonga Public Safety Commission. A subcommittee of the Chamber's Government Relations Committee was formed and has operated as an open forum. In lieu of a final report, we request that the Public Safety Commission in drafting a substantive analysis of the report consider the following points raised during the subcommittee meetings. -SUMMARY- The primary function of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce is t.o promote and ensure the most positive possible economic climate for the community and to attract the highest quality businesses and industries to our City to mitigate a current imbalance in our jobs/housing ratio. In atccacti r,g new .job- and revenue-generating businesses to Rancho Cucamonga to mitigate that imbalance, one of the most important factors we communicate to potential businesses is our City's visionary and innovative approaches to maintaining the highest quality of life for our community. This approach, and the City's willingness to communicate and cooperate with quality businesses, is evidenced by our City's exercising considerable business acumen and cost-effectiveness in it's utilization of existing contract law enforcement delivery systems through the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department - a fact which major employers will find extremely attrac*_ive when considering relocation. Our study of the Heiss Report indicates that the City's current ability to deliver the highest level of service at the lowest possible cost through contract services is a critical component in Rancho Cucamonga's ability to attract those quality businesses which will attract greater discretionary spending and joh generation while allowing our residents to enjoy greater time at home and with their Families. In addition, time has been spent by our Government Relations Committee in working to promote greater local influence -2- over that of more distant legislative bodies such as County and _ state agencies. Our review indicates that cities are the mos t. ~. .~ trustworthy and efficient spenders of tax revenues. Utilization of existing services are another example of that cost-ef fieciency. -CONSIDERATIONS- Due to the major impacts on our economy - particularly the recession, a disputed census count and the Persian Gulf War - which have elapsed since the delivery of the Heiss report in June of ,..y~ .... -ty ..o.,.,,.-' -., ..,.~., ..,.d5alsry constraints pe r:nit -~to commission a supplementary or secondary report which will study the following factors in greater detail: THE OVERHEAD ISSUE: After our discussions with San Bernardino County Sheriff's Capt. L. Ray Harper and Contract Services Coordinator Hob Tremaine, we feel that there is currently no real or immediate threat of the County's levying overhead costs to the City which would raise the cost of maintaining existing services to a higher level than implementing comparative city police services. We feel that the matter should be addressed by the Commission in greater detail than that provided in the report. THE IDENTITY ISSUE: A more intensive study of community attitudes towards the maintainance of existing services ay opposed to an in- house police department is absolutly required before any comprehensive recommendations can be made tc our City Council. Our studies indicate that, as more and more cities are considering disbanding in-house police forces in favor of contract services, the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Depar tn~ent is exhibiting a Feightened sensitivity fcr tha need for community identity and fo: the specific services which are of importance to our community. EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF COSTS: AS our subcommittee determined that no particular business, commercial or industrial land use generated an inordinate law enforcement service requirement; we feel that any efforts to fund any improvements in existing services or implementation of local services consider that law enforcement costs should be borne by the community as a whole, with no excessive burden on any segment of the community. Assurances that any additional and long-term costs can be successfully absorbed by the community as a whole must be provided to the community before any steps are implemented. THE AFTER-COST ISSUE: A study of the long-term impacts on the City budget of police pensions and potential tort liability must be part of any final, comprehensive recommendation to the City Council. These projected costs should be computed as per-capita costs and included in any comparison between contract versus in-house costs. THE 'TENOR OF THE TIMES' ISSUE: Our review indicates that more and more California cities are implementing or considering contract -3- services in lieu of in-house services. We suggest that any comprehensive recommendation to the City Council contain testimony from these cities' officals as to why this route was taken 6y these cities. In addition, any cities which have eschewed contract ., services in favor of in-house services should be polled as well. r.~.. THE HIDDEN COST ISSUE: While many of the Sheriff's services, such a5 the Hanicide Bureau, Detective Bureau, Mounted Posse, SWAT team and Helicopter Division would be made available upon specific request by a local police chief, we feel that contract services ••: >> - and do - provide an economy of scale as the various departments Invoiv ~.. a already 'networked' for greater and more immediate coordination in the event of mn ~:.: =r;mns. We feel that departments which are already well-aquainted with one anotner a..~ working towards a common goal result in a time economy of scale as it automatically resolves the frequent miscommunications which often hamper cooperations between sheriff and police departments in those cases. This should be addressed as a cost issue. THE CHAMBER PERSPECTIVE: In assessing the Chamber's perspective on this issue, it should be noted that, while we tried diligently to approach our study of the report with a dispassionate. 'dollars- and-cents" mindset, the vast majority of our member businesses, their employees and the Chamber's directors are also residents of Rancho Cucamonga. It was also noted that even those businesses operated by non-residents are dependent for their livelihoods upon the quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga and when they require law enforcement services, the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department responds whether it is a contract or in-house service. A great sense of personal satisfaction with existing services and a tremendous sense of pride in our City pervaded the discussions. -THE CITY WITH A ViSiCN- In closing, we feel that the City's cost-effective use of existing contract services, particularly in an era in budget deficits and revenue shortfalls, demonstrates• a City with courage, vision and a tremendous sensitivity to the entire spectrum of it's residents' public safety needs. We applaud the City of Rancho Cucamonga elected officials and staff and the San Bernardino County SheriFf's Department in it's joint effort to make Rancho Cucamonga the Finest city in California. We feel that this dedication to quality is of inestimable value to the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce in atteacting quality husinesses and industries worthy of our City and citizens. We applaud the City's Foresight and leadership in utilizing the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department for services. The subcommittee humbly offers it's services as an information resource to the City and the Commission in this endeavor. Submitted this 6th day of March, 1991. Gary Christian, Chairman Dennis and Jack: Per instructions from the Engineering Division, please remove item H1 from ~~ the agenda, as it will not be discussed tonight. Debbie 6/5/91 cc: City Council Lity Attorney ::lt z yr nnn~:nv ~. u~.:unvnvn MEMORANDUM DATB: Juno 5, 1991 T0: Mepor and Nemhere of tM City Council PROl1: Jan Button, Deputy City Cle SUHJSCZ: ITSa DS O_e Tkffi *~e+n 5 199 CZ :NCIL AOLNDA Thie memo Se to edviee that the Resolution number shown for Item DS on the Consent calendar, No. 91-134, authorising the destrvction of City records, should be changed to Resolution No. 91-157. /m cc: Jack Lam -ehra J. Adams James Harkman CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM CONFIDENYIAL ~I~ "' 1977 June 5, 1991 T0: Mayor, Members of Lhe City Counci~l /amend City Manager FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official ~y/o'~~ SUBJECT: UPDATE ON KERNWOOD COURT FIREP//(L%%%ACE REPAIRS - TRACT 13318 A few months have passed since the last update on the above referenced repair activity, essentially because progress has been extremely slow. As a refresher, this issue evolved from an improperly constructed fireplace in 7 homes. Through investigation, other code violations were discovered, i.e. the lack of underfloor ventilation and bracing, and questions regarding the structural design of the homes. Since that time, a number of discussions have taken place between the original design engineer, a consulting engineer for the homeowner, our consulting plan check engineer and City staff. We have completely resolved most of the issues raised by the owner's engineer after many hours of re5ea rch and correspondence. The remaining two issues we believe to be just recently resolved and we are awaiting concurrence from the original design en gf seer. We were informed on June 4, by Bayous Development, that an agreement has been reached with Dieckmeyer Enterprises, a local contractor, to perform the remaining repair work. Written authorization to enter the properties has finally been provided by the homeowners and we expect the repair activity to commence within the next 2 - 3 weeks, depending upon Diec kmeyer's current schedule. Completion of the repair activity is expected to take 1 -2 weeks. Staff is cautiously optimistic that the repair work will be completed within the next month. We will advise the Council on the outcome. JG:11 cc :Rick Gomez. The Caryn Company Caa( 0(Tice flox 92(6. Diu 1Syuna. CA 92ti7T-0216 Ollice (714) 499-59_m fi1X (714) 499-5173 June 5, 1991 ~,. To: Mayor Stout and Members o[ the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Re: County Referral 88-05, University Crest Dear Mayor Stout and Members of the City Council: The followin¢nrn my comments on the Citv's Staff Reoort on County Referral 86-85. following the outline of the Report: RECOMMENDATION: City Council support the actions suggested by Staff, as modified and attached. BACKGROUND: The project is located in County territory end may be annexed to the City upon the majority vote of the voters in the project area. County Staff recommends approval of the project; the City Staff recommends denial. City Steft says the key reason is "because this project is depen- dent upon the Etiwanda North Specific Plan". County Staff, the University, Mrs. 61cNay and The Ceryn Company all agree there is a very strong inter-relationship between the University Crest and the rest of Etiwanda North and indeed within the entire planning area north of Route 30 and west of 1-15, historically known as North Etiwanda. In Etiwanda North, the majority oP the voters, acting es the Etiwanda North Landowners Coreortium, believe the County can responsibly manage this important addition to the community, setting higher standards for both quality of li[e and fiscal responsibility. As reasonable people may agree to disagree, we disagree with Staff that "approval of the subject property by the County would be inconsistent with the County's General Plen policies..:'. City Stott believe<_ the project would have negative impacts or. *_he City. 4Ve disagree on ?he following issues: 1. Traffic Impacts: Staff believes "impacts within the City are partially identified and partially mitigated". iVe believe impacts have been fully identified and mitigated to the degree that the development of Etiwands North may actually improve the level of service that might otherwise be expected within the City. 2. Park Impacts: We believe the County's Etiwanda North Specific Plan sets a standard possibly twice as high as the City has to date. Because of this much higher level of service, we bet?eve the development of Etiwanda North under the County Plan will help relieve the current park and athletic field shortage within the City. The County's Plan is "conceptual" as Staft states only in the respect that it preserves the financial flexibility to locate the pro- posed Community Park where it can best serve the community. This flexibility becomes particularly important with yesterday's defeat of the Parks ballot issue. 3. Drainage Impacts: City Staff is correct that storm drainage flows do not follow the City's Master Plen o[ Drainage, bet only in the one instance where the City's Master Plan is in conflict with the governing document (the 1983 Master Plan for the Dey, Etiwanda and San Sevaine Creeks Systems, co-signed by the City, along with the Cities of Fontana and Ontario and the Counties of San Eernard~no end Riverside). 61aya~ S[out anei iviembers of the City Coun^_t! Cowty Referral 88-05, University Crest Jwe 5, 1991 Page 'Cwo 4. Police Impacts: As opposed to what might be implied from Staff's comments, University Crest and Etiwenda North ere both projected to fuLLy twd their necessary police services. For additional discussion, please refer to the 21 page report by Lend Plan Design Group and the three page report by The Caryn Company, dated August 21, 1990 end September 5, 1990, respectively. ••• -: - - .:.,.:.y ii a iuieuiiuu, we auggeai ti:e proposes neaoLUtlon De modified as attached to emphasize a renewed spirit of cooperation between the City, the County and the voters of the Consortium. Respectfully, ~ ~(\~(\/C~~// Joseph N. D!lorio, for The Caryn Company University of California Mrs. Betty McVey ~.,» RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~~'~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE SUPPORT OP THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RELATIVE TO THE CITY ACTIONS TO ANNEX THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPHERE AREA. WHEREAS, the City has always maintained [het our Sphere-o[-Influence is vital to the welfare o[ our community because o[ geographic location, inter-connection of d.,, ...a_,:,._ _. _.. p . .. ..........ny vy~~. ueuj, unw~/uu,cuipa yw Dee vicG-1'eiaiiullMilipX; aad WHEREAS, the City desires to foster the expeditions and logical annexation of said Sphere-o[-Influence; and W HF.REAS, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has expressed interest in fostering improved sub-regional find local cooperation in planning; end WHEREAS, the opportunities are aet present to enable a coordinated approach to lend use and development in the Sphere; and WHEREAS, the City desires consistency in development patterns and regulations between the City's Sphere-of-Influence and the City; end meat ~ WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to ensure environmentally, as well as economically sound planning for the Sphererof-Influence; and WEiEREAS, thq' ro er a~sae~~phere is a key factor to the successful moderation of density, use of compatible development standards, coordination of infrastructure facilities and ultimate development of the area. WHEREAS, the City and the County have been working toward the common goal of excellence in planning for the City's Sphere-of-Influence, es most recently demon- strated by preparation of a City Etiwanda North Specific Plan and a County Etiwanda North Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The City requests the cooperation and consent of the County and the voters in annexing all County-owned land within Rancho Cucamonga's Sphere-of-Influence; 2. The Ci[y request the Board of Supervisor's and the voters' support for the City's effort to annex the remainder of its northern sphere; CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. Etiwanda North Sphere Area June 5, 1991 Page 2 ~ ... 3. The County grant to the City, through a cooperative agreement e eed n b [he Count the Cit and the E[iwenda North Landowners Consortium, review and processing o eli planning end development proposals (with ell requisite processing tees) within the Sphere-of-Influence, while having the County retain its approval authority. 4. The City urges the Board of Supervisors to adopt a position that ell development within the Rancho Cucamonga Sphererof-Influence be required to follow end adhere to all development standards and poticies oP the City of Rancho Cucamonga; an9 oxce~t where the Board believes County standards to be more eppropnete. 5. Deleted by Staff. h. The Board of Supervisors consider a suspension of development approvals and processing in the City"s Sphere-of-Influence wtil the County's Etiwanda North Specific Plen is adopted, unless the Board can make a finding that such approvals are expected to be consistent with the Specific Plan. ~J --.. ]y / t 1 ~/ ~~ O/fi' %IJG „jP~'~iS 49 d 1 /'P t'i AZ~/QY t/ / / ~~1A7 >; ~ G/fy i~r s /70 ~ces~s•r1 0,~ ...... o~ `~an<<ie CLltz rsaty~~J~a rir l~Pr YCIr/~F) fJ /'GCnS S o.~" o~Llcr H~~~d',~'.~isu! ~ ~te' / 717k7" A / ~ ~ssur~~ 'y`/~e1` G'~7! S'~lncl`rcrJc~ aC~di-+~e~ mac` / r7a7 rl ; ~ , f ~ ~~rii '~~T ./%Til /ht ~~-%.,~;';~i•r~" .,;ctF; ;.:j "yhe N//'e;J~sr l , t 1 n 1, //fi'? ~-,~; J is a la/ ~ /en t ~rols~{{~00 }rd kf e ~~ !bo,~ fur fh Fv- I~ ~o ,~; _i,_: n [ f'rC? . Ot? ~/un6!~ a !~(!w / ~ 1/ ro55 ~'C~!h :~~rra '' 'r?~•Fi5 ~....2 ~~~ /<+`JL!Y~.Tisr ~/ft 'l o!'/GC. W/1 /! .~7~[r1 G+''Y P/3'S C)~ ~/ ,~ rec'~;%//v~, ,/~//%5 acrSGY/,~C/- c.A~~r 7"/$~rYlce ~^eyu/rPs ~ f'GO~ 1Y12~Ct/Jleo`" {~/c/O -Lc/a i~ Rh7~cq~ . / %%l e Cc~'~ ~-o/ V/c. ~iav/a. S~eC// F/c¢ ~~ ~YO ~j, ~/7' ~~P %'.; rr//a j~0~ L~'!' /Q~'~y YDD~ fYIC L/I7 TPc~ ? ~I~r. / (.~QC'// r G/i i 17°Y !/' /P5 T ~'~-1'QJ ~/Oi~,; C.,' .: ~ ^ JP/P =~ ~74 ~ J~{;i f' / r / / / ~1rP,+r%:r'a 1a°ic7 /55Ke5 Frl~Jti!/7t$ y-crc,s/d~i>r, -~,~ /1/.'~ '/,7" ~ O!~ /I';~"~'"4 ~ ..///,')lA r1"n /] ~/O Yi~N n~ <-(r iii ~i/m. a /s r w/T•" ~ n c! 4/ l''fn!!%d 7o Yc -/cr/a :; '/Jv : .k~//G1LV~~~. , _...~i ~r,~.'./1['h/ ~~ 5 ~fryC~i~d~ ~ .Z~ S°"I%'l''.. i /I2 ~ ~rl £ r_^I^, /~ jFn,50T /~f4rl/7!n~ f-a~ipiUg ~`;~iyJ}~~!/G%n ~ l'r~F/7.5.° ;~t9C ~r~i~,_n,/;6 G7nd j-,r:I</~1.=/^/~6u!ir~'i"~~i ~`~i~:l'/'~r /S `~dh II~G r / ~o/y.,:.e~~.,,,,.~ ,.o /~tiJ arls' b~dihaHCP~. /ls r~ou oYe ~=rG~~ot~~yt~,gwave / CGz k 'S' or'e/ /;e/mow` /aw o/G'/e!~°,•ij/!f-,~•~, ,f/j..~ arF 4c~rPPnrP;/fs p~e~evPnr~ ~l'i~i/a ~~o Far ~~-; ~s vn.:=i. ~~;~;P ny Fd, ...' ?,/' q /Pn/ / i r'~ ~a r~J G n~ 1l n ~'r: . ~r//~17~1lc~ !'JDLYIY ,~tCcrr!"S !r~ I/ic ~cria Q`c Yc~~lu.rpgA 7e /JC[.P~ ~ C'Cc~~;. q:. 4 ~G~?e.?'~ ~'io/' yr //Sa ~t ~Jd~,~.! ~i/s Gona/ir~on /-uhy wi/~ 7~irTii~/r _ ~c i`/t ~qna/ 1i?clF~~yra?/t/y. ~Y G~ ;s GfJt~~q~~,nr~ o/~ /~c'~/orta', C/cc~~r q~~f`~Y~ L~=~~l~ ~? ~ar7 Cy' 7T/Y ~c.ri~~'iq l0/vr/YlGfr7r~~/ / ~ ~ O ~ /!5 4~/~Cesry/Yr/7`5 ,pe/we~~ ~i'/dc fC ~lrr 7"i~s CC~/PS Cttr, ,(~> ~~~rccd ~hrK 7`~ir G/d!/ su.i~ ~ -yam, ~G `oYccPSS. ///C .Se/~OK/ ~ISPa~ 1/7 r i/Y SP /y/477~e'i-S 1 ~r C/d/ / su/~f' rPrtlQirrs 7`~i r or//~ y-.PO/ ~,P7r.-y ~? ¢ fo J/D~a ~.~.;// o '~ Cc ~ /F 's G/rd?. /for n4~r/ C)/-cun~;~tancYS ~ ~r7( rl5//yam/,7~" fou/~ ~~ /°~asona/~i/ t•.-~~occ~f'-P~' fc ~`~~~P~~ his ~roPp~~ ~,. d .~~ / ~ ;'C>~.'. ~ ~~ /. ~'~ 4i7 ~ OY ~D {mot' C4 %Gi l/'gi9 ~" / ., ^~rs~~,pp~~-. ~+GT 7~Jf 5/~`~t4~/GrJ LJe /"~ll~d ~iJ/Sc'/vim //? ~/e?~F/i7~~>\/S/ C/ W!!~ SDO/'f ~^cemF ; ;iY/~ass/d/e / DDachs off' CrU~; ~'T.rin; 7r ,.~ S ~'ai, ~P/I/~q_- %/O /~ /7U~~~F~ U/t; J~ ~c~oriq ,~,, T:,P /ash 7 d`~tys ~/'Os5 CcGrr,~y /i~c~/%~Ha!/D/ Pi;y/~Yy /N4'~ a~f>~.1.~~~~v 7'U S'i{~ .. ~~ ,y-f 's n o't 7ta~ We 5/~~c.~ ,~co ~/~~` 0 6~e~~ ....~ _ _ --.. nrc~5 ~p.vr} f' ~ GLyI ~/?YJa.S Tj'la~~'a~S°S Oub _ Go /'JC or r T~t' `~ac. ~ ~ S S ~ iH rrt o.~ j ~.~ ,lj /t,.~.~ :..-. cost/aI USP 77`ll Coh9 ,fiarl• C~.v rpr~~~rt7 i, much 12/cr~ uhdQ~Pn ~d/~ 7•~fr reps/ LAYYI I?'J Gtn ; J7r S r~or/ar~5 f~''y ?Cr ~! ~a Tt~7~ yy~~ /~oCPS,S~/r, Tij`~ CC' '~ iQ, ~ ern a' ~C rrr/4"/~° ~af!C cdl9rrNr/,~~e/~ ~u /~/_//. ~'s~' 7~i~ f~i4~IG/ / Y~yf ,/O ~L1 ----°- ~'LyS /ar~/7 TS i/p~r 7`~ti A/4J-lJ'7C~ i~ /'t 'f'/ /P l7/'C // ~~ff F ~ ~•e'; yip 9//~~ ~n ~`erlr/ r u ~, Y~~h ~CCT~'- Q~ / / ~l/S C/~N rv~rns-P~ ~ 'T//Jr ,Prv1 p cry / / / // -- W/~ ~p roI~LCI'ii~'t•~ rf~!lJFj7TJ~ -t-G L/]~ c>r' /'l7 {c`7 a ~ lSlvr• l~z°Pdp~ ~C Qs:: ~L/ ~ ~4 ~`" , -- / /, _ _ s n.v/-~~„ ~~ ~. rod- Ce/~~j;~~e /~~/ ri~p-t=-_/.(~ /N el$~r~'~~/rJ /'sd ~E-3Y9 /'i/~L_r/i/7`/r'/ J.Cr plZ~l~S r~ G/Y-c/-7~ ~4~/f'J ~X~~'P`-/7 %~/9h,d~r~. / ~ ~