No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005/05/25 - Agenda Packet C~ r1 lJ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CuRc~oNCn May 25, 2005 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Maaas _ Vice Chairman McNiel Fletcher _ McPhail _ Stewart II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES May 11, 2005 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Comm~ss~on atone time without d~scuss~on If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion A HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00794 - EDDIE ROW LAND - A request to develop a 5,093 square foot single-family residence on 47 acre of land in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 9010 Laramie Dnve -APN 1061-811-08. B DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00567 -STEVE WU - A review of site plan and elevations for eight single-family homes on 2 8 acres of land within previously approved Tentative Tract Map 16421 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east of Hermosa Elementary School -APN. 0201-182-03 Related File Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 25, 2005 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings ~n which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related protect Please wart to be recogn¢ed by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per md~v~dual for each protect Please sign m after speaking C. STREET NAME CHANGE DRC2005-00315 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -The proposed renaming of Wolfson Drive to Coyote Drive for an existing street adjacent to Day Creek Intermediate School, located north of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard. D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 - MARK CAPELLINO - A request to subdivide a 7 27 acre parcel mto 10 parcels, with Parcel 2 for Condominwm purposes, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street -APN: 0209-211-19. Related Fdes~ Development Review DRC2003-01185 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration E ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-00106 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to change the land use designation from General Commercial to Park for 3.36 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Drive and to change the land use designation from General Industrial (Subarea 1) to Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 5 54 acres of land, located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue - APN 0207-262-18 (portion of) and 27 Related files Development District Amendment DRC2005-00107, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and Development Review DRC2005-00220 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to change the zoning designation from General Commercial to Park for 3 36 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Drive and to change the land use designation from General Industrial (Subarea 1) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 5 54 acres of land, located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue -APN 0207-262-18 (portion of) and 27 Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and Development Review DRC2005-00220 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration • • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 25, 2005 RnNCeo 3 CUCAh10NGA G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17156 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to subdivide 12 8 gross acres of land into three parcels within the General Commercial and General Industrial (Subarea 1) Districts, located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Madrone Avenue - APN: 0207- 262-18avd 27 Related files General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00107, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and Development Review DRC2005-00220 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS H. ENGINEERING DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 VII. PCJBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS I. DISCUSSION OF DESIGN AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adfournment time If items go beyond that time, theyshall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 19, 2005, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C~v~c Center Onve, Rancho Cucamonga ~~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Division at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ® ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Vicinity Map Planning Commission May 25, 2005 B E, F, u ~~. .~ * Meeting Location Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 N City of Rancho Cucamonga I T Y O i RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE May 25, 2005 TO• Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM• Brad Buller, City Planner BY Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT• HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00794 - EDDIE ROWLAND - A request to develop a 5,093 square foot single-family residence on .47 acre of land in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at 9010 Laramle Drive - APN: 1061-811-08 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION• ANALYSIS: A General: The proposed project is asingle-family home located on the north side of Laramle Street, west of Beryl Street, and is bordered by a 15-foot equestrian easement to the north The proposed prolect is a total of 5,093 square feet The lot coverage of the property is lust below the 25 percent maximum allowed. Through the process, the applicant has significantly reduced the square footage of the home from 33 percent to 25 percent to meet code requirements. With this proposed home, a 3,156 square foot tuck-under garage Is proposed as well. The cut of the natural terrain, to achieve a tuck under garage, is a total of 8 5 feet. Any cut or fill greater than 5 feet requires Design Review Committee and Planning Commission review and approval. The applicant met with staff regarding the placement of the garage and ways to reduce the cut of the natural terrain To reduce the cut of the natural terrain would mean the applicant would have to omit the garage Because the applicant has created a tuck under garage with the entry facing east, it will be less visible from the street view. Additionally, If the garage were raised to not exceed 5 feet, then the slope of the driveway would exceed the maximum allowed. B Design Review Committee. On Apnl 5, 2005, the Committee reviewed the project The Committee recommended approval subtect to revisions to the height of the retaining walls The Committee directed the applicant to work with staff to resolve this issue (Exhibit C). Item "A" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2004-00794 - EDDIE ROWLAND • May 25, 2005 Page 2 C. Grading Review Committee On Apnl 5, 2005, the Committee reviewed the protect. The Committee recommended approval of the protect subtect to revisions on the east and west side yard retairnng walls. The protect was approved with three conditions (see Exhibit D). D. Environmental Assessment: This protect is categorically exempt from the regwrements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEQA Gwdehnes. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2004-00794 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectful) submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB•EC\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Site Plan Exhibit B -Floor Plan and Elevations Exhibit C -Design Review Action Comments dated Apnl 5, 2005 Exhibit D - Grading Review Action Comments dated Apnl 5, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for Hillside Design Review DRC2004-00794 • ~--pZ w F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p g ~ ~ g ~S s d ~ a a ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ 8 p c3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ p P @ A g d a a J $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W W F 0D O r N N Y b b 1~ b P O ~ " gi b ' I~ m m O N fjJ N dl ~-~ !I ® ~ ._ o 0 ,~ il. jijj ~G~ Y tll ~~ ~ ~ ~: s ~ :~~ ; ~ ~`D - ~ ~ ~~~ i • ~~ ° ~, i 9 ~ e N ~ I Mr. & Mrs. Eddie Rowland I Basic First Floor ~ ,xeiau.aBla. uwr.~ nwr~nne.nmaa ~ ® ® o 0 9 ~~ iS ! Ei ~ o o, 0 a . 0 a t~ O Ir ~ •~h'~~"° GUY w. GARDNER DR~WVJGS BY ~~u ~°~~~~ ~ 1952 ~~ ~"~ A z ® ® ® x 1~L~JJI ® 1 i ..... Fir uw rwq.um $ ® t ~ ~ a ~ ~~ r ~~ ~ ~R3~ ~V9409 9 9 V9V ~G pAp 3i B o ® r $~ P ~~p~ P A P ss~ a m ~~ ( ` ~~~ a ~~ o ~ ~~ o ~ s~ ~~ o ~~ R ~a o ~^ a a~ ~$ m ~` m ~- o ~~ ~~ b2 = ® ~ f ~~ ~~ Z $ t ~, U o ~g _~g ~ 9 9 ; / \ M ~[ 1~ ,~ ~e 5 o ~ o ® $ a ~ ~ R t e a ~' 9 ~! ® ® p ~ ~ w ~ Mr. 8 Mrs. Eddie Rowland Basic Second Floor '"r'~°fe GUY w. GARDNER 7aB76 Crtlp DrNa DRAWINGS BY ~ ~°~''u9779 DRC2004-00794 ~`~~ ;~ 1952 $ e P e a ; s a ~e'i~i 'mm i ~ c ~ a 6 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ 8 R I s 7 i i e : : : ~ : : i i i R# ~ i 9 9 e 9 y 9 e m 99 m 9 e 9 96 49 a9 99 C 6 G9 6e 99 w+ 99 e 9 9m 999 G G 4 0 9 C O Q Op 94 e Q9 99 9~ 4 ,p9 i'k' F F i i 6i i i~' Fi f~ di° i i ~ F @ ~ € r e er ~ze e ra € €~ ~i € €C Y r ia i I i a i ii ii i is' i ii ii i ii ~~ i ~ i ~ § 5 i 5 i S S ' 6 G U ~~ I ® 1 ~ ~ o ~~ ~~ 1 L_____________________J Mr.B Mrs. Eddie Rowland Basic Garage Floor ~, ~`SB `a GUY w. GARDNER A ~ ' ,~~ I~u' ~` ,~ \ 1952 DRC2004-00794 I 4-J Ley ____ 1 I 1 •' `` I I 1 1 1 1 1 I ~ \ 1 1 ~ \ 1 1 L.1 Jf I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 > ~ F~ I 1 1 1 1 -----------J ~ r- !i ~~ t - ~; ;~ r 0 0 e e_ 9 • a • ~e ~[i 9 a r---------- i i i i -- i i i i i i i i i i ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ ~ i i ~ i ~ i ~ ~, ~ Mr. 8 Mrs. Eddie Rowland Dimensions Main Ploor DRgw ~eyfe GUY w. GARDNER ~ '~„ ~ ~,~:.uu•~s ~,1952 DRC200400794 °~°°'°'~ ~"` `~. ~I~ `J 1~ u 1r ~, u e 0 s e e 0 3 a • M V ~ ~ IMr.BMrs. Eddie Rowland I Dimensions 2nd Floor I "`""eC`Yfe GUY w. GARDNER DRAWINGS BY ,~6«•a~• ~E~,..~ ~ 1952 6 Fllana.,g9f7ss flR(`9flfld.f1079d ~;,G Bf81 [T 6 n i r O • a • o_ 3 • e • _ ~e a ~i• y 9 7 3 {~ ll 4 '; __ & Mrs Eddie Rowland Mr Dimensions Garage Floor GARDNER re GUY w ekA N S ~ ~ . . . D WI BY G ~ ,~~~. ~91n9 ne«=,.~ ~ 1952 ~u~~' DRC200400794 • ' ~ ' I a /~~ ~ i `---1 I ~~5/ ' ~ [[ i ~ ~ ' i i i I~ i i ~ ~' ------ i i I ~ ~~-------------U - - ~ i ! I _-_-_. J r---_--- I I ~• x_ I - ----- - - -- ----- ~ - ;_ - - -- ---f - j- ----- I ~' 1-- r '--_---_~ ~------- ; - L! I _ -_--_--_e _.-_ ._.._ ._ I 1 _ ~ _ _- L- _ _ -l_- _ i _ i t i- -i t--_ 1 I I I ii i i I ~ I I- l i I i t I I I l es ~ I I . L-_._-_-_-_-_-_-.-_-_- -_.J I I _-_._-_-_._ _ _._-_- ._-, i I I 1 I I ~I i I I ~ it I 1 I -~ ~ - - -- r- -- !I'}-- ------~~ ---- - a ' i i m ~ I ! Ft i i ~ c ii I i i , it I i i i i i ~ i I ! 1 i--- ,. ~m ii i i I €m ii i i 1 3o it i i 9 ~ I I I I~ I 1 ---_-- ~ .-_ -_. - -_ .--. ~ I ~ - I I _ _ I I I r - _-11 I ! J I I r-iV,--- ---ii_-J I r•----------- Itt-- - '------ ---•-- ~ ~ ~ r-- --------~ . I ~ I! j ! 1- - - --~ - - - - ----- ~~- ~ - - --- ~ -~ i I i! i i i I~ ' i !i i i i ~~ I i ~ t ~4- i i ~ I ii i i i I t i ' ~--------i~~- I i ---1r- - -- -- =.J i i r---•-•i •----- I i I I -------'---- -- ' I ~ ~ >t I I -- - -- - - - -- i i I ~ _ I 61 r i i ---L--+ .C__---~ I ---i---------- I I i i I _ I I I `~' i I I L-_-_-_-_-J i ~ ~ I Mr. 6 Mrs. Eddte Rowland I Foundation Garage ~ ,~~D.N. EtlranM,GOf779 nnMnndll(170d -_.-~ d L .tih"r~~"'° GUY w. GARDNER DRAWINGS BY ~ U 9fM ~°«~_~~ ~ 1952 1g~ ``~ 19 ,~ I ~/ I 1 _ _ i. _ -~ 0 M 0 C M v m 0 e r ~= €o ;o 4 -- i8 ~ ~ I Mr. 8 Mrs. Eddie Rowland ~ ~ ,~~o~. ~.~~~ erchkeeture GUY w. GARDNER Elevations, Front & Rear pRAWINGS BY ~t~,E~=~.~ 1952 WEST fdN'.U 91191 ~,~ nar.~nnesmae __ _~ - I 6 ~~ I _ I i g I ~~ I ~tt ~ I t I r--- -- i 1 I ~! i' i ! I ~ ~~~ ~ r~ i ii i i ~~ i I }_ va ~ 1 I F~F I I ~ I ~ I ' Q i I ('I I77 ~ I I i I~ al ii ~ I~ I 1 I( #I j~ ~ 17 I II~~~II'~~~~.~7.p.~ Ig 31 I s[ 'V~ 1 19 vl Igo 118 I 1 I ~I j/ ~ I I i i ~ I rr I i I 11000 ~ I 1 i i I I I' I 1 II 1 I I j f I __ i I I I ( 1 i 1 II _~ I A ^^~ Ig I ~ I ® II I~ I ~ I I IIII m ~ ~ I y I ~ Il ~ ^^~ i I ~ I I ~j I r i i e II i M i I M 1 I I I I _ - I I I I I ~ li ~ ^^~ I I m I I ~ I i ^^~ 1 I • I I I gg~ I w ^^~ 1 I F .~ j I I I £~ I I I ~~ 0~0 ' 1 R~ I I I i I _~ I I I II ~ 9 i II ~ I ~(]0 ® I I I I i I vv j ~QPOOO i 1~ i 9 1 I ~ 1 I ~I rgg ~+ I '4II~~ H I I I I 1 i II IE ~ I I I 1 ~ it ~I I ~ 1 I I y~ 1 1 I 1 I I PJa I I 1 II I ii I I I I If I I i i I~ ia~ ! ~~' ~ ~c I i~ I~~ I p I I I! v I i I P i j ~~ I 71- - --- ~ g~$ ~ ~~ y ~~ ~ ~ ~-- ~hitea re GUY w. GARDNER ~ ~ Mr. 8 Mrs. Eddie Rowland Elevations, Right 8 Left orcnvnrl~s er ~„ ~ ,~~p p,~, mDLGPttLZ 5t sII8 ~' 1952 E'""andi~BA°~~9 DRC200400794 ~'°""" DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.20 p m. Emily Wimer Apnl 5, 2005 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00794 - EDDIE ROWLAND -A request for asingle-family residence in the Very Low Residential Distnct (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 9010 Laramie Dnve-APN• 1061-811-08 Design Parameters: The project is located on the north side on Laramie Street, west of Beryl Street, and is bordered by a 15-foot equestrian easement to the north. The proposed project is a total of 5,422 square feet The lot coverage of the property is 24.98 percent, just below the 25 percent maximum allowed. Although the square footage of the house is gwte substantial, the applicant has reduced the ongmal square footage The applicant has proposed a 3,156 square foot tuck under the garage The cut into the natural terrain is a total of 8 5 feet that regwres Design Review and Planning Commission approval. The entnes of the garage will face away from the street and public view. The applicant has met with the staff regarding the maximum height and square footage of the project The square footage of the home has been reduced onginally from 33 percent to 26 percent and finally to 24.98 percent (02 percent below the maximum), and the retaining walls have been reduced in height Staff Comments The following comments are intended tc provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues. The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1 The pnmary issue is whether the proposed project substantially meets the intentof the Hillside Development Ordinance The purpose of the Hillside Ordinance is to minim¢e grading, utilize architectural design techniques that allow buildings to follow the natural terrain, and preserve the natural topography. The Hillside Development Ordinance standard is to excavate underground or utilize below grade rooms to "reduce effective bulk and to provide energy efficient and environmentally desirable spaces." Staff believes that the proposed design, with the below grade garage, is consistent with this standard and the surrounding area 2 The retaining wall heights of 4 feet along the east and west property line exceeds the allowable 3-foot height Redesign the retaining walls to terrace with a 3-foot planter between the walls as required by the Hillside Development Ordinance (see Exhibit "A"). Secondary Issues: Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues 1. Because the project is at the maximum lot coverage allowed by the Development Code, no other enclosed structural additions may be added to the home on the main floor or in the rear yard area without the approval of a Minor Exception or Vanance (approvable only by the Planning Commission) /~-/~ DRC COMMENTS DRC2004-00794 - EDDIE ROWLAND Apnl 5, 2005 Page 2 2. The protect will require Landscape Plans to be submitted by a licensed Landscape Architect pnor to receiving Building Permits. The front yard landscaping and the slope planting are required by the Hillside Development Ordinance. 3 If the applicant would like to incorporate a corral into the rear yard, a separate exhibit illustrating the minimum 70-foot radius between the corral and the adjacent homes must be submitted pnor to approval of the corral. The trail access ramp shown on the Grading Plan along the east property line does not comply with City standards because it would place corral within 30 feet of proposed home However, there is sufficient corral area at the northwest comer of the lot adjoining the trail. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion• 1 All of the walls exposed to public view, including retaining walls, shall be decorative (i e stucco, split-face, or slumpstone with a thm cap). Staff Recommendation• Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project subtect to the above requirements, and forward it to the Planning Commission for review and approval. Attachment Desinn Review Committee Action: Members Pn;sent• McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner Emily Wimer The Committee recommended approval subtect to working out the retaining wall with staff. A--IS~ • T H E C I T Y O F L2ANCHO CUCAMONGA Memorandum DATE. Apnl 5, 2005 TO: GRADING COMMITTEE• Dan James, Sr Civil Engineer, Darnel To, Associate Engineer, Dan Coleman, Principal Planner TIME & PLACE Planning Department Conference Room at 9:00 a.m. FROM Michael Smith, Assistant Planner SUBJECT. GRADING REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA FOR APRIL 5.2005 Agenda Items Are: A New submittals 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00033 - GMID (Doug/VUillie) Conceptually approved 2. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2004-00794 - EDDIE (Emily/Mark) Conceptually approved subject to the following condition(s) a) Provide a concrete drainage ditch with an area drain behind the retaining wall that is located at the north side of the property The ditch shall receive a naturalized treatment per the Hillside Development Ordinance. b) Provide a 2-foot wide bench adjacent to, and parallel with, the public nght-of-way. c) At the southeast corner of the property remove the existing parkway culvert and replace with a local area drain that pipes through the curb 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00567 -STEVE (Emily/Cam) Conceptually approved MS/ge ~}"~~ p it 1. _.In~ (n ~-~ RESOLUTION NO 05-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC200400794, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 5,093 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT 9010 LARAMIE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061-811-08 A. Recitals. 1. Eddie and Francis Rowland filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC200400794 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 25th day of May 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows• 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on May 25, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows• a The application applies to property located on the north side of Laramie Drive, west of Beryl Street, with a street frontage of approximately 100 27 feet and lot depth of approximately 203.07 feet, and b The properties to the east and west have been developed with single-family homes, the property to the north is vacant, and to the south is Laramie Drive, and c. The site is vacant and contains no vegetation other than native shrubs, and d The proposed development is consistent with single-family development m the area; and e. With this proposed home, a 3,156 square foot tuck-under garage is proposed as well The cut of the natural terrain, to achieve stuck-under garage, is a total of 8.5 feet Because the applicant has created stuck-under garage with the entry facing east, it will be less visible from the street view. Additionally, if the garage were raised to not exceed 5 feet, then the slope of the driveway would exceed the mawmum allowed ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-35 DRC2004-00794 - EDDIE ROWLAND May 25, 2005 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows• a The proposed protect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b The proposed use is in accord with the obtectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4. The Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identfied in this Resolution is categoncally exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualrtyAd of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(a) of the State CEOA Gwdehnes 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, . this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is fora 5,093 square foot home located at 9010 Laramie Dnve 2) In addition to the vegetation required by the Hillside Ordinance, extensive ground cover plantings will be required to provide erosion control to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3) Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend with the existing terrain and present a natural appearance. 4) Select plant matenals for their suitability to the environment 5) Retaining walls exposed to the public view and the return walls are to be decorative masonry and compatible with the architectural style. 6) A detailed Planting and Imgation Plan, inGuding slope planting, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 7) Provide a concrete drainage ditch with an area drain behind the retaining wall that is located at the north side of the property. The ditch shall receive a naturalized treatment per the Hillside Development Ordinance /~--~ 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-35 DRC2004-00794 - EDDIE ROWLAND May 25, 2005 Page 3 8) Provide a 2-foot Hnde bench adtacent to, and parallel with, the public nght-of--way 9) At the southeast comer of the property, remove the existing parkway culvert and replace Huth a local area dram that pipes through the curb. Enaineenna Department 1) The drainage runoff from this developed site shall not adversely affect the existing homes/lots downstream of this side Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entenng the project site from adjacent lots. Lot grading shall comply with the regwrements of the Building and Safety Department. 2) Maintain the pnvate drainage and equestnan easement to the north, 15 feet Hnde n 5 feet onsite) Prowde, restore, and protect all drainage fatalities within the easement The owner shall be responsible for all maintenance of drainage easement fatalities on this sde. Retaining walls and other structures shall not be located within the drainage and equestnan easement. 3) Concentrated flow down the dnveway shall not damage parkway grading Maintain flow within the Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) dnve approach through the nght-of--way. Removal of an existing curbside drain outlet (if not used) and replacing it Hnth curb, gutter, and sidewalk wdl be required Install new curbside drain outlet(s) through the parkway m accordance Huth City Standard Plan 107-A. 4) Revise existing Public Street Improvement Plans, Standard Drawing No 847, to show the new dnve approach, install new curbside dram outlet (west end) and street trees On the title sheet of the plans, fill in the street tree table and construction notes as regwred by the City Engineer. There shall be a minimum of 5 feet from the extension of the side property Ime near the edge of the dnve approach. 5) Provide additional street trees per City Standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6) Protect all existing street improvements in place including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pavement, and streetlights. 7) Provide a 1-foot Hnde level bench adtacent to all penmeter boundary Ime retaining walls or at the property line. 8) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of curb to 1 foot beyond the sidewalk along all street frontages On-site grades totoin parkway • Huth mawmum 2:1 slope. 9) Per the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control BoarcJ (RWQCB), Non-Category Pro/ects are regwred to submit a Water Quality ~~ / PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-35 DRC2004-00794 - EDDIE ROWLAND May 25, 2005 Page 4 Management Plan (WOMP) Complete and submit the WOMP for review by the City. Details of Best Management Practices (BMPs) being implemented and the Operations & Maintenance (O & M) thereof should be attached to the signed Owner Certification sheet 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Rich MaGas, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2005, by the follov~nng vote-to-wit• AYES. COMMISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS• C_~ /¢'a.0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2004-00794 SUBJECT: SINGLE-FAMILY HILLSIDE HOME APPLICANT: EDDIE ROWLAND LOCATION: 9010 LARAMIE DRIVE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comole0on Date General Requirements 7 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/ /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-35, Standard /_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits 1 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/ /_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Htllside Ordinance. 2 Prior to any use of the pro/ect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. ,~' a.l Protect No DRC2004-00794 Completion Date 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as ail Uniform Bulding Code and _/_/~ State Ftre Marshal regulations have been complied wdh Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Budding and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compltance pnor to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdroision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/ /_ all receptacles shielded from public view 8 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 9 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed _/_/_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval pnor to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and pnor to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, inGuding fencing and drainage devices, in con/unction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i a ,private equestnan easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced _/_/ with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as _/_!_ veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestnan access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora _/_/ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official 10 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' assoaation, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved priorto the issuance of bwidmg permts 11 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the pro/act perimeter If a double wall _/ /_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adtoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mad, all contiguous property ' s owner at least 30 days pnor to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the pro/act perimeter 12 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property Imes), rather than /_/_ wood fenang for permanence, durability, and design consistency 13 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/` gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC 2 ~a Protect No DRC2004A0794 ComoleGOn Date 14 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry _/_/_ i d L ~ scap ng an D. 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Clty Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Trees shall be planted in areas of public view ad/scent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area l-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also incude one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting regwred by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy 5 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained in a healthy and thnving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition 6 Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and imigation shall be required per the Development _/ / Code This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting 7 Landscaping and imgation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/ / perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 8 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the / /_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department E. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/ /_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid ovefiead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Cary Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710; FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE• ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements . 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, 3~} -0~.3 Project No DRC2004-00794 Comole4on Date b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceding and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (DRC2004-00794) Geariy identfied on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report /_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and 'bvet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to / /_ the City pnor to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are regwred for Penang and/or walls -/-~ 5 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/ contact the Budding and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements G. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved pnor to construction All plans shall be _/_l~ marked with the project file number (DRC2004-00794) The applicant shall complyvnth the latest adopted Califomia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance: of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant / / shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department pnor to permd issuance 3 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays H. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the Califomia Building Code for regwred occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. _/_/_ I. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance: with California Building Code, City Grading /_/~ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance: with the approved grading plan 4~. a~ Project No DRC2004-00794 ComoleUOn Date 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Bwlding and Safety Official prior to the issuance of bwlding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Cnrd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Security Hardware All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices K. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner. ~. Building Numbering 1 Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility M. Alarm Systems Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number. (909) 941-1488 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED / / -~-~- / / / / -~-~- 5 ,~- a~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS March 3, 2005 Lot 68, TR11626 9010 Lazamie St. DRC2004-00794 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 2500 gallons per minute at a minunum residual pressure of 20- poundsper squaze inch. Tlus requirement is made in accordance v~nth Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fse Distract Ordinances. For structures in excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-III- A-1 3 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located wrthm 600-feet of the proposed project site. Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtammg the fire flow mformation from CCWD and submittmg the letter to Fu•e Construction Services. 2. Address: Note on the plans that pnor to the granting of occupancy, smgle-farmly dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated dunng penods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. ~_~ ~--a~ T H E C I T Y O F 12ANCtl0 CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: May 25, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Emily Cameron, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00567 -STEVE WU - A review of site plan and elevations for eight single-family homes on 2.8 acres of land within a previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTTi6421, located in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east of Hermosa Elementary School - APN: 0201-182-03. Related File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421. A. Project Density: The project density is 2 8 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Development, Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Development, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Development, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Hermosa Elementary School, Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Protect Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - School D Site Characteristics• The site is relatively flat with minimal slope of approximately 2 to 4 percent. The site is rectangular in shape and is currently being rough graded. There will be 8 trees replaced on-site. The site adjoins Hermosa Elementary School to the west. ANALYSIS A. General: The Planning Commission previously approved the subdivision on November 12, 2003. The applicant is now proposing to develop eight single-family homes, with floor plans ranging in size from 3,756 square feet to 5,436 square feet. The applicant is proposing three plans with five different architectural variations. All plans are 2-story; however, all garages have a 1-story roof pitch on the front elevation. Plans A and B provide athree-car garage, and Plan Cprovides afour-car garage. The architectural elevations incorporate many details, including wood corbels and window trim, front Item "B" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC200400567 - STEVE WU May 25, 2005 Page 2 courtyards with wrought iron detail, rear elevations with balconies and wrought iron detail, and driveways with decorative concrete paving. The project meets and exceeds all of the required standards and recommended guidelines of the Low Residential District. B. Desion Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on April 5, 2005. The prolect was well received by the Design Review Committee after several issues had been addressed (Exhibit D). C Techrncal Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on Aprtl 5, 2005. No outstanding issues remain. D. Minor Exception: The applicant has also applied for a minor exception to increase the height of the perimeter walls to a maximum of 8 feet in height. The applicant is proposing a 4-foot retaining wall, with 3-foot freestanding, and an additional 3-foot wrought iron fence. The maximum calculated height (2-foot retaining with 3-foot freestanding and 3-foot wrought iron fence = 8 foot calculated height). E. Environmental Assessment: Environmental review was completed with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421, and approval of the original Development Review for this site was presented to the Planning Commission on November 12, 2003. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further environmental review is required for subsequent protects within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved Tentative Tract Map and Development Review shall apply to this protect. RECOMMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2002-00618 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB•EW/ge Attachments• Exhibit A - Site Plan/ Fence and Wall Plans Exhibit B - Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit C - Landscape Plan Exhibit D - Design Review Action Comments, Dated April 5, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2004-00567 ~'vZ L'll11J11U anv r+os-1c+ Lt-HZOi r „-. cLci p ~r~+n~~~^i S30N301S3tl AIIWtld 31~N19 tl1Y 'OM 'A'S OAi18 ~~~ ~'~ ~ 3 O ~G 1 L i °=§~~ o ~a~-s _, - ~kT - d ~ Q 1 ~__ LL Z ~ 'J ~9NV IJOa'1In LI-G1101 - ~sw ~ ~,a ~ ~~:.~~ I Iasi i 63~N301S3k1 A'IIWVd 3'1JNIS tlro YIM 'AS 3A31i d N`d"1d 1 t imroe+ s~nwe.~r 111 a ~ I P ?~-~° - i t iE if'f i -i`' f is 1', i i` ~~~1a+t '~ ~ I ~ ~ i I i ~ ~ , _ i ~ ~~ I I I Q ~ ~-- -- ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~~ ~~ § ~~ 'b i I 'oi B ~ 1 ~ n~ ~ _ ~ I ~ , /-_- I ~ ~ I ~ .i , I Ali ~ J - I '~ __ z I ~0 _ I I ' ~' ' ~ i~ I - ~1 ~T -~-T ~iy,L _ -{- r 1~ I' 1` ~ ~ ~ ~ p-;L~ ~ I~-p i ~` r. P _Zr -~ ~ ~ I 6 ~_~ N~ • r ----- r i Lam'..-__ _ __ I I ~. PLAN A ~ G 11 [ u _ LJ j i l ~-® ~ aJ~ ~ -Y~-r~-n 5~4 ~'~I", q~-v IDS-off ~~ 4~- -STEVE S.Y. WU, AIA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ~~ ~~~ a vn I ~ ~ ~'`- ,-'fir IApRIbCt Fa0.1KT i J~ PLAf~I A 'STEVE S.Y. WU. AlA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES 4{ iV° 1 i ~Wne~ri'ruv~m! a Lcfe t ~ I yy i : ~ m~`~T° ~ letli-Il NIL6oN ...vq . • Ara ni4et P+GJeGT v G F'I-AfJ A -STEVE S.Y. NN. AIA 51NGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ~ I E ilw rneu ,...~w~c D ~vi~ b t E ,<.,~,~„ ~,~, I a loilj•11 YJIL6oN Lv8 _ 1 Mellitecl Fwyec7 F'LAt~I AI STEVE S.Y. WU. AIA SINGLE FAMILY fiESIDENCES 41I 4 s ~ ~ aln mer.l nvr+~e 0 iofe ,y.,~; ;;b„ „,~ ; , ~~ . loilj-1~ FIILBOI-I nvE, n~~ n~u ~ec~ lIJ1GIIO 4IL.~MTIO~. G/. gl'1'il ~ MLM4et Pt10JGGT i d pJ.-AtJ. AI ~TEYE S.V. Wli. AIA 51NGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES gI~rYFl .nw+~r • e lcT+ t ~ __ _ i4. 1 TWRG GTI U 1111C' ~~~~ I IOLI>•~N 41G.d01.~ .~.VB 1 .Im a ann..~'+~«'~+ S30N341S3H AIIWtld 3l~JNIS tlltl 'fIM 'A'S 3A31S.. 1'~aNtdl l~el IV»r _~~ - _- b ',4 ,~___ _ _ I~ i~ I I I b };.~ - I r i~ „~--- W I~ ~_~_ -_ I ~ ~ 41 I b ~~ I_i,b N ~ i ' -0 I O i~ ~i ~i I Q I ~ 1 t n c --~ ' ~ t - _ ~_ ~ '' ' - 3 -- ~ ~ 8 111x,'1 I L I ~ ' -. , s ~ ~ , e i 4 1 ^ q ~~ t I y' M1 ' J I ; `\ I` ~; i FY _-__~- ~Oli I - . _~--~' I -J c_, "~' I _ ~' I _ _o ~~ 'O± I ~ N f~ 1 tI tT I 'di i Z_ tj 4 I __ _. __.~...t i 0 I I d I i I -~_~ P'_- 17_Ill I I 19-8 I ~~ _IB ~ _ t__ P ii~ IG}LI '!' i~P"I`' T~_IZ ~°_~~'I _ - -'-- 1°-ICI -'~- -- - - - - -- p-Ibs 3 ]L ~ r2~ ^i 1 ty w+.... r. s- _.. .a .. ~.... .~. _.v a ~=fir ~.•.w ...r.+.r~~n~ne .-~....~m+~~.-.~.... ~~ IEIIIIIIIII 'env IVODIIn LI-ilaol W wUL h~~ aLHi1 a1G'1 Q +nr+^~r Fence rlh S9~N301S3d AlIWVd 3l'JNIS tl(V '!IM 'A'S 3A31S Q 1~2fyeN, lanlVa+Y i ~ t ~ + ~ ~~ ' 4 1 I Y -1"° li ~ 9 ~ ~I 1 •19 1 1%-8 I _ I I ~/ 4 \-~ I , s I ~~}- - -- i~i ~ ~ - ' I ' ,F ___ I ~v ,~ N ~I i r ~' I Y, .:- - - "'r - - -- p -_-- ~00I m' I 'z - --i-r l _r I J ! I a' Il- -! I ~; ~ ~ Y'? ! ~ _~ Y I _ -` ,y ~a 0 W ~ ~ N ---'` . 'off -01 ~ I I I _ _ i I "Tr- b_19 ~=a i I -_~ __ 4__fL-~~ _--_I"La--_ ~-1~ r~ 14=ICI N-~a P-p /- 1_ o-~s ~' ~,... Noe-un ~~-a.=o~ ,~,.e...~ i I olo~ v on,....i'.,oe «i,' S3~N301S3Li AIIWtl~ 3"I'JNIS Vltl 'AM 'A'S 3A31S ~ N`o "jd ` G 1 1~a('oul IaglVan/. ~~ - PI,Af`1 B STEYE S.Y. WU. AIA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES E ~~ ~~;~ ~... .~„ ~N _.,o _ i '9nv ~V091~M LI "[It01 ,~~~ ~ 1 aWL VJ'11n 91Hi1 ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~I C~ aa, 9 wr~v rKawa Hlf I ` S97N301S3tl AIIWtld 3lJNIS tlltl'AM'A'S 3A31S ~ rl`d"ld p 17aItRa1 iavl Nary ~ 1 _~ I i ~ ~F I ~ " Y ~ - i ~O q _ I N '/ ~ V p O ~ ~ -_- I ~ _. _ o ~ O' - i~ ! b v =~ -;I ~ -- -- - -` ~ - ~ - _ a _ / ~_ I ~ o J _ ~ d N ~ ~ ~ I r r ( 2 I ~t ~ ' ~ ~ I' ~ ~' _C ~ _ / 1 ~p ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 33 y i _~ p I I ZZ ~ ~i 1G ~ -O ~- - i ~ lL' '-- j~~y- - - - -- - -- I i ' ^~ LL1 - ~-- -4 - ~ r Q ~ ~ ~ ~ J I --- I ~ Z ~ ~ ~1 i I 1~ . O /~ I ~\~\ I ~~ ~----- ~-------'~----- -, ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ .,_ /-~/ I~ ,per Fr ~ ' n Izl_e p PLAN G S 1 0 -~ I~ -o 211-0 ----'Z-o --- STEVE S.Y. WU, AIA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ~~'tieef4urru r°me a vro I I i t ~ ahit~et RWecT ~ ~ PLAN G STEVE S.Y. VN. AIA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ~R ~~~r~mo 6 L°'ro q t yp M.-e~~s less>•~1 WLBad !.v0. • • ( 'pnv r1ap IIM ~~-t~ao~ 73 pp ' ales G ~e~r'~+n°m Hh ` ~ ~ 3 1 ¢ca I ~ S3'JN301S3tl AIIWtl~ 3l'JNIS Vltl 'NN 'A'S 3A31S 7 Ivd"ld 1 O l~afvai Ia~aIVaR ~- 1 l'1LLll11U r a '- ~ ~. _ ~. 'O •_ ; 1, v- , M ~ -- a i i 'gMr IJep11n Li-~~101 - _ Wo1 4 ~~ h~ H~ 53JN30IS3H AIIWtld 3l'JNIS tlltl'f1M'A'S 3A315_ IQ ~Vd"lc~ J ' vu '~ I b ~ (((Q ^~ I r- nli ~=~i n ~ 131 _ I € ~~' a ~ ~ ~ p ( 3 6C d ~ -.± ~~ii[i 'J~p,,,dl i 'o I J ^0 g 2 \~~ ~ ~ N ~~/ ~ o ~ I ~ c 0 J(' , I I '. I P"~i5 -~ - ~ I ~ _1 u i~ 8n`i No9'Ill`1 Li•"isa~ u.e.we.n YLe'I 0 a~~a+V M bYIN S3~N301S3k! AIIWtlj 3lJNIS tlltl 'f1N1 'A'S 3A31S 1~aroxd 7aq lVa+' v ~i _y~% ,,, -~ - e 1 - ~~ -ys + ~ ' ~ Y / i k_i __ ~n If ~ ~~ ~~ 3 ' i ~f~s ~~~ Ig 1'v1d 4 1 I r 1 _. _ __ _ __ _r -~ I i I I ~ I N _ _'_' ~-oL___ - ~ r_'e.. +~-~61 ~ "f P-h t c Ali ___ ~ -~~ F 02° ~ Mc~i4ct W41ecT ` ~ 8 ~ ~ PLAN 61 STEVE S.Y. YVU. AIA SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES Fog I ."w"~ ,^u r~wc ° ~°T° <.lL a~l IGLI~i-Il WIf eAA ~vn _ I I ~~ be-14e1 F>aNKT ~ I I 6 ' ' p~,qN gl _g7Ey~ g,y, yyV, plp SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES I yyyy~~eanL ~w~ i Flop +mnp,'C~.*~x4}e - ~T .nl ieuD.n NiLben~l /ws 1431 MO133 333 • 3Mf111'~1g1 ~g ° G9 Ib 8 s~ r __~si________ A~ ° G4 t r~~ ~ ;, :~~te --------- - ~ 1r r n ~^i'f g~ i1l ~ i ~ni Y ~ ~ G~ ~$ X o ~$ -~ $ ';'~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ 1 . ~^N tC U i~gC 8 8~ O `. L• _ _ ~° ~° ~' e a i~[.gli~ a 3 ytl3@~~ I k~ ~ ~ i s lE~~~1~ ~ ~ . ~ g .ao.ooo ~ +~ 9 s d i y ~ y ~ ~i~ I~~ 3 ~ ~ pia 9 ea~3 1 ti ~ I! E~ i! l a v o ~~~~`~ i I ~ ~ : ~5.e~i ~ ~ f~ a 9I~~E i ~' 3 s ~ I 1 ~ ~ ! ~ ~ 9~ ~@ ' ~ aii~ii ,. ~ i ~ ~ ~O~OOO t I o~!a ~ ~9 i i!B~'! ~~ W 2 U i /y ___~_____-...-_J ; ~~__ _I -_ _ _ - - ~ '3/~~ NOf -~ ______ __ r' i ~ ' _ M~' EE ~N ~ ` 3` 'x i~ pp 1 ' ~ ~ k rs ~ ~s o ~ 0 U L' .- :s ,i~ e go ~ f r a $ ~ a e ~ ~ t ' ~Ca _ / __________________ ___ °I _ ~ _ 1HSItl 3~OSY 333 • 3N171D1171 ~+c DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7.40 p m Emily Wimer April 5, 2005 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00567 - STEVE WU -A review of site plan and elevations for 8 single-family homes within previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east of Hermosa Elementary - APN 0201-182-03 Related File. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421. Design Parameters: The site is located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Mayberry Avenue, and east of Hermosa Elementary School. The applicant is proposing eight single-family homes on a total of 3 17 gross acres of land. The property was originally reviewed by the Planning Commission on April 23, 2003, for a General Plan Amendment to allow Low Residential requvements On October 8, 2003, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 was approved by the Planning Commission and included adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Since the General Plan and Subdivision approvals, the applicant has submitted an application for Design Review of the eight lots The elevations consist of three separate floor plans and 5 separate elevations. The applicant has incorporated cultured stone, decorative von railings, the accents, stucco trim and detail into all elevations and decorative scored concrete driveways. Plans A and B provide three-car garages, and Plan Cprovides afour-car garage The site slopes dust under 8 percent in grade, and does not require stepping of the floorplans. The floorplans range from 3,756 square feet (Plan A), and 4,170 (Plan B) to 5,436 square feet (Plan C is a custom home) All homes are two-story Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect. To reduce the massing of all of the homes, staff recommends that the applicant incorporate full courtyard areas with lush vegetation surrounding each entry and surrounding the low courtyard walls Vine pockets shall be incorporated on the lowwallsand stucco areas. Walls are limited to a 3-foot height m the front yard area Because of the limited landscape area of Plan C, a custom Landscape Plan shall be submitted and reviewed for approval. Provide significant articulation (i e , horizontal movement of wall planes) of all four sides of the houses to avoid they "box-on-top-of-box" appearance. The Committee should carefully review the rear elevation of Plans A, AI, B, and BI to decide if the 11-foot wide bay pop-out provides enough movement m the footprint of the home. Staff suggests popping out the rearelevation, and adding a substantial enclosed balcony with a roofline to match the balcony. The faux balcony shall be expanded to create a useable depth (minimum of 5 feet). Staff also believes that the side elevations of Plans A, AI, B, and BI do not offer articulation because the homes have been designed at the minimum 5- to10-foot setbacks 3. Increase architectural variation Elevations for Plans A and Al are almost identical and would benefit from roof form variations. Plans B and 61 are also very similar to Plans A and A1. A street scene front elevation should be provided showing all eight lots in relation to each other, with accurate side yard setbacks D -a~ DRC COMMENTS DRC2004-00567 April 5, 2005 Page 2 Secondary Issues. Once all of the ma/or issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Although the front setbacks provide +/-5 foot vanation as required by Code, there is opportunity on all lots for even greater vanety The proposed average rear yard setback is 65 feet and could easily be reduced Add larger vanation to the front yard setback, stagger the house footpnnt to provide movement. 2 If possible, provide reverse plotting on a few lots for streetscape vanety All homes have been plotted with garage on the downhill side of the lot. 3. Front entnes of all homes shall provide upgraded detail including stucco surrounds on the double door entnes, as well as the windows above, to match all surrounding windows On all elevations that depict a stone matenal midway up the chimney, the stone veneer should continue up on the entire chimney farade 5 Decorative wrought iron gates on entnes and side yard areas shall be upgraded with detail and tnm to have a finished appearance 6. Dnveways should smoothly flare-0ut to full width, not abruptly change width at right-of--way line. 7. Whenever possible, side yard retaining walls should be eliminated in the front yard setback and replaced with slopes. It appears from Grading Plan that these retaining walls are typically only 18 to 24 inches high near the street Policv Issues. The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. All walls exposed to public view, including retaining walls and return walls shall be decorative (i e. stucco, split-face or slumptone) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that project be redesigned and return to Design Review Committee Design Review Committee Actlon: Members Present. McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner: Emily Wimer The applicant presented revised plans addressing all issues, except retaining walls. The Committee recommended approval subject to working out the retaining walls with staff. ~`~ RESOLUTION NO. 05-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00567, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR EIGHT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON 2 8 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16421, IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, EAST OF HERMOSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-182-03. A Recitals. 1. Steve Wu filed an application for the Design Review of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421, as descnbed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of May 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Plannng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 25, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows• a The application applies to the property located on the east side of Hermosa Avenue on the south side of Wtlson Avenue, with a street frontage of 198 feet and lot depth of 615 feet, and is presently vacant, and b The property to the north of the subject site is Low Residential, the property to the south is Low Residential, the property to the east is Low Residential, and the property to the west is Hermosa Elementary School; and c. The proposed home designs are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 25, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds and conGudes as follows: a. That the proposed protect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and ,~ a~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-36 DRC200400567 -STEVE WU May 25, 2005 Page 2 b. That the proposed design is in accord with the o ectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; an c That the proposed design is m compliance ith each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d That the proposed design, together th the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or w are or materially in~unous to properties or improvements m the vicinity. 4. An Environmental Review was co leted with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 and original Development Review forthis site, and pproved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2003. The California Environmental Qu ty Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further vironmental revew is regwred for subsequent projects within the scope of the Mitigated Negativ Declaration. The proposed protect of eight single-family residences is within the scope of the pn Mitigated Negative Declaratron. Based upon the facts and information contained in the prior Mitig ed Negative Declaration, together with written and oral staff reports, the Planrnng Commission fi s that there are no substantial changes m the project or the site and its surrounding conditions, hat would require revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration All environmental itigation measures from the previously approved tract and development review shall apply t this project. 5 Based upon the fin ings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby appr ves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditi s, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: 1) A mim um 5-foot planter shall be provided between the sidewalk and the mer side yard walls for Lot 1. 2) All ertinent conditions, including environmental mitigation measures c tamed in the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map Q BTT16421 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2002-00756 shall apply. I J En i eenn De artment ~U I~ 1) All conditions of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 shall apply. ~~ Missing street improvements along the property frontages shall be ~ improved including, but not limited to, curbs and gutters, streetlights, street trees, drive approach, pavement, sidewalk, signing, striping, etc and as required. Hillside Road and Hermosa Avenue are City "Collector" Streets. 3) The Commurnty Trail shall be per City Standard 1002-B to match and loin the existing trails north and south of this project, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Hillside Road shall be undergrounded along the ~-a~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-36 DRC2004-00567 -STEVE WU May 25, 2005 Page 2 b That the proposed design Is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the distnct in which the site is located, and c That the proposed deslgn is Incompliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, well not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 An Environmental Review was completed with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 and onginal Development Reviewforthis site, and approved by the Planning Commission on November 12, 2003 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that once a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, no further environmental review is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the Mitigated Negative Declaration The proposed probed of eight single-family residences is within the scope of the pnor Mitigated Negative Declaration Based upon the facts and information contained In the pnor Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith wntten and oral staff reports, the Planning Commission finds that there are no substantial changes in the probed or the site and its surrounding conditions, that would require revision to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration All environmental mitigation measures from the previously approved tract and development review shall apply to this probed 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth In paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subbed to each and every condition set forth below and In the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) A minimum 5-foot planter shall be provided between the sidewalk and the comer side yard walls for Lot 1 2) All pertinent conditions, including environmental mitigation measures contained in the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 and Tree Removal Perrnlt DRC2002-00756 shall apply Engineenng Department ~3 a ~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-36 DRC2D04-00567 -STEVE WU May 25, 2005 Page 3 entire protect frontage, extending to the first pole off-si (east and west) pnor to public improvement acceptance or occup cy, whichever occurs first All services crossing Hillside Road shall undergrounded at the same time The developer may reques a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted st for undergrounding from future development, as it occurs on the o osite side of the street. If the developer fads to submit for said reimb rsement agreement wrath 6 months of the public improvements bei g accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursemen shall terminate. 5) The existing overhead utilities (tel mmunications and electrical) on-site shall be undergrounded. 6) Lot gradings per City Standard all be followed and incorporated into Grading Plans. 7) Atypical side yard grad g is 2 percent (minimum), 20 percent (maximum) from the bwlcjing pad to the flow line (flow Ime is 1 percent minimum, 3 feet minim off the building pad). 8) Atypical rear ya grading is 2 percent (minimum), 8 percent (maximum) from t pad to flow line (flow line is 10 feet minimum off the pad) 9) Section AA ap ies when the pad difference in elevation exceeds 1 foot, Section BB f pad difference in elevation is 1 foot or less 10) The V-ditcF>'of the trail shall be located on the upstream edge. The trail shall be ti ed to drain to the V-ditch 11) The gr a break on the downhill dnveway shall not exceed 14 percent, and 1 feet flat in front of the garage shall be 13 feet at 5 percent to Howl e, then up 5 feet at 2 percent 12) ere the trail gradient exceeds 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs, or o er diversionary devices shall be used Where a downstream end of IQ trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0 5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the nght-of-way line to prohibit off trail surface debris onto the sidewalk/street. 1) The developer shall install landscaping and imgation for pnvate maintenance by Lots 17 and 18 along the Hillside Road side yards. 14) This development is creating some parkways that appear to have questionable maintenance responsibilities, such as Lots 3 and 4 of Tract 13621 along "B" Street and the south portion of "B" Street cul-de-sac at the west end. If the parkway maintenance responsibility is not confirmed, the parkway shall be hardscaped to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ~ ~7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-36 ~'~ DRC2004-00567 -STEVE WU ~v • May 25, 2005 Page 4 ~ C ~ / 15) All applicable conditions of Planning Resolution No 03-164 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 shall apply. a) One of these conditions states, 'The owner of Lot 1 shall intain the proposed side yard of said lot along Wilson Ave a The perimeter wall should end at the return wall for the fut house." Likewise, no retaining wall in the front yard of Lot 1 n the north side of the lot) should extend into the front ya ,beyond the return wall. 16) Regarding the retaining wall, month a garden wall o top, along the east side of Winchester Court, the most northern ext t, the garden portion should stop short of the intersection for line of fight purposes, both for the new street and the ewsting dove appro 17) Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the gutside diameter of any pubhc stone drainpipe (as in Lot 8), measu d from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 18) The property line adjacent the s ewalk, along the Wilson Avenue frontage of Lot 1, shalltoin the e " ling curb adfacent to the sidewalkto • the west, consistent with Stan rd Drevnng 103. Environmental Mitigation 1) All environmental mill lion measures for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 adopted y Planning Commission Resolution No 03-164 shall apply 6. The Secretary to this C mission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPT D THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION Q THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY• Chairman ATTEST. Buller, Secretary I, Brad BulleE Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby . certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: ~~ ~D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-36 DRC2004-00567 -STEVE WU May 25, 2005 Page 3 9} 48; 4~ 43 a 4; ~7 ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-36 DRC2004-00567 -STEVE WU May 25, 2005 Page 4 "1 All applicable conditions of Planning Resolution No 03-164 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 shall apply a) One of these conditions states, 'The owner of Lot 1 shall maintain the proposed side yard of said lot along Wilson Avenue The penmeter wall should end at the return wall for the future house " Likewise, no retaining wall in the front yard of Lot 1 (on the north side of the lot) should extend into the front yard, beyond the return wall 6}2~ Regarding the retaining wall, with a garden wall on top, along the east side of Winchester Court, the most northern extent, the garden portion should stop short of the intersection for line of sight purposes, both for the new street and the existing dnve approach Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drainpipe (as m Lot 8), measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk 4 The property Ime adjacent the sidewalk, along the Wilson Avenue frontage of Lot 1, shall tom the existing curb adjacent to the sidewalk to the west, consistent with Standard Drawing 103 Environmental Mitigation 1) All environmental mitigation measures for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16421 adopted by Planning Commission Resolution No 03-164 shall apply 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby Certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2005, by the following vote-to-wit ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-36 DRC2004-00567 -STEVE WU • May 25, 2005 Page 5 AYES• COMMISSIONERS• NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C~ /~ ~-9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00567 SUBJECT: EIGHT SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES APPLICANT: STEVE WU LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Com letlon Da 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, ds ~_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the aftematrve, to relingwsh such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, tts agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-36, Standard ~~_ Conditions, and ail environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits 1 DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if bwlding permits are not issued or approved ~~_ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include ~~_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations 2 Revised site plans and bwlding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be ___J~_ submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. SC-1-OS ~ /J '~~ Protect No DRC2004-00567 3 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fast. 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 5 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner For single- family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 6. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 7 All bwlding numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination 8. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the protect perimeter. If a double wall condition would resuR, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adfoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the profect's perimeter. 9 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 10. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 11. For residential development, retain walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 12. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot walVfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of bwlding permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. D. Building Design All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with archrtectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surtace treatment subfect to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or protections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. Textured driveways and textured pavement shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/bwldings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses SC-1-05 ~~/ 2 Completion Date ~~- ~~- ~~. ~~. ~~. ~~. ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~ Protect No DRC2004-00567 Completion Date F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in ___/~_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of bwiding permits or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdmsion 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2.1 ~___/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting regwred bythis section shalt include a permanent urigation system to be installed by the developer pnor to occupancy. 3 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater ___/~_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, t-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-faintly residenbal development, all slope planting and vngation shall be continuously _/~_ maintained in a healthy and thnwng condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those unds, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory conddion 5. Front yard and comer side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development ~_/ Code. This regwrement shall be in addition to the regwred street trees and slope planting 6. Landscaping and irrigation systems regwred to be installed within the public right-of-way on the ~~ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the ~~_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department G. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location ~_/ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner revew and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1 Submit froe complete sets of plans including the following __J~- a. Site/Plot Plan, b. Foundation Plan; c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; SC-1-05 3 Protect No DRC2004-00567 Comoletion Date e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line dtagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground dtagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (i e , DRC2004-00567) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a sods report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are regwred prior to plan check submtttal. 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the Ctty prior to permit tssuance. 4 Separate permits are regwred for fencing and/or walls 5 Developers wishing to parttapate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submtttal regwrements. I. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the protect file number (t e , DRC2001-00001) The appltcant shall comply wdh the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations to effect at the time of permit application Contact the Butldtng and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Prior to tssuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mator addition, the appltcant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to. City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall prowde a copy of the school fees receipt to the Butldtng and Safety Department prior to permit tssuance. 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to tssuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 6.00 p m and 6 30 a m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays J. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Bulding Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. Provde compliance with the Caltiornta Butldtng Code for regwred occupancy separations 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. K. Grading 1 Grading of the subtect property shall be in accordance with Caldomia Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be to substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Caltiornta to perform such work ~~. ~~. ~~- ___J_/- ~___/ ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~- ~~ ~~. ~~ SG1-OS 4 ~-~ Protect No DRC2004-00567 Comolehon Date 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/ time of application for grading plan check ~ 4 The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/ /_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Offiaal prior to the issuance of budding permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction protects and for _/_/ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civd Engineer APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors / /_ 2 All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices _/ / M. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _/_/ from frame or track in any manner APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED L_J SC-1-05 ~ J~ 5 ! RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS August 25, 2004 Wilson Half Street Wilson between Haven& Hermosa Tract 16421 SUBTT16471, DRC2004-00157 & DRC2004-00567 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design gwdelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential protects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential protect from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. m On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any bwiding. FSC-2 F1re Flow 1 The requred fire flow for this protect is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the regwred fire flow subfect to Fire Distract review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide regwred fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are regwred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. ~~~ 4 On all site plans to be submitted for revew, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or pnvate water main system before construction. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal have approved the request for an alternative method. The Alternative method requires that: All homes and garages shall be protected with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance to NFPA 13D. 2. The street shall be constructed to a minimum of 26' in width. 3. Parking will be not be permitted on the east side of the street. 4. The east side of the street shall be posted with °East side No Parking-Fire Lane° signs in accordance to RCFPD Standard 9-7. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the protect. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6° above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: s3 -3~ 1. Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 4. Fire Protection: The fire Sprinkler system shall be inspected, and final approval shall be obtained from the Building Department. 5. Fire Lane: Signs shall be posted on the east side of the street. • i /~ -3`7 C I T ANCtlO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: May 25, 2005 TO• Chauman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad Buller, Clty Planner BY• Thomas Grahn, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT• STREET NAME CHANGE DRC2005-00315 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - The proposed renaming of Wolfson Drive to Coyote Drive for an existing street adjacent to Day Creek Intermediate School, located north of W ilson Avenue on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard BACKGROUND: On December 3, 2003, the City approved the street names for Tract 16100, located on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of Wilson Avenue, adjacent to the then developing Day Creek Intermediate School The street naming request included five names, four streets that are adtacent to proposed residential units and one street that is adtacent to the school. The name Wolfson Dnve was selected for the street located adtacent to the north side of Day Creek Intermediate School (Exhibit "A") ANALYSIS: The Etiwanda School District (ESD) submitted the street name change request primarily because of the similarity of how "Wolfson" and "Wilson" sound when pronounced The similarity in how the two names are pronounced causes delivery problems, may cause parents and community members to tum on the wrong street, and has the potential to cause delays in emergency services. Wilson Avenue is a secondarystreetonented in an eastwestdirection thatwill eventually link the eastern and western portions of the City; Wolfson Drive is a local residential street located on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard, north of W ilson Avenue. Because of the proximity of these two streets to each other and the possibility of causing other problems, significantly, that of delays in emergency services, staff supports the suggested name change Consistent with the goals of the City's Street Naming Ordinance, the proposed name change is necessary to eliminate the potential for confusion caused by the naming of specific streets. The ESD requested the street name be changed to Coyote Drive, which is named after the school mascot for Day Creek Intermediate School. The naming of the proposed street follows the guidelines established by the Street Naming Ordinance (RCMC Chapter 12.12). The following requirements were observed in establishing potential names a) streets which are continuous shall be extended in accordance with the present street name whenever possible and feasible, b) courts with the same name as the preceding street should be avoided, c) any cul-de-sac or dead end street with aturn-around which cannot be reasonably extended, shall be designated "Court," and d) east/west streets, parallel to, but between named streets and limited to one neighborhood or Uact, shall be designated "Dnve." When the Item "C" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT STREET NAME CHANGE DRC2005-00315 May 25, 2005 Page 2 proposed street name met the requrements regarding east/west streets limited to one neighborhood, it was named a "Drive." There are no residences located along Wolfson Dnve to be affected by the street name change; Tract 16100 is under construction, and no lots are onented towards Wolfson Dnve. Cons~stentwith the notification requirements of the Street Naming Ordinance, property owners adjacentto Wolfson Dnve were notified of the impending name change and given the opportunely to comment on the proposal. Vanous City Departments, Police Department, Fire Department, and the Engineering Department, were notified of the suggested name change, no opposition to the change was received. A EFFECTIVE DATE: The Planning Commission is regwred to establish the date upon which the street name well become effective. The date must be at least 60 days after their action approving a street name change The attached Resolution of Approval suggests that the name change become effective on Monday, August 1, 2005. B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Section 12 12 060 ofthe Municipal Code determines that the "changing of street names has no possibility of having a significant effect on the environment and therefore, such an action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) " CORRESPONDENCE• This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the affected street posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners adjacent to Wolfson Dnve. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval of Street Name Change DRC2005-00315 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, i B ad Buller City Planner BB:TG/ge Attachments• Exhibit "A"- Location Map Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2005-00315 ~-a 1 ~ o ~~ ^~ A~ d~l ~ ~ Zz~'o ~ - 1 , - ,' Qp .. ~ E..i oI'i 'tyy~ gg°o~p ~ ( 1 1 1 ~ li~+~ ~plp y~y~ I j H ~~ ~ z~ ~ ~~i ~sgp~llaaa~3* N~agp,~ - ~E, ~i,~ H $ i ,~ ~ _ __ ~ i h i , i i i ~ i i i i i~ i i ~ ;'~ ' ' [.7 ~ .. ~ ---, ~, i ~~_ s~ ~-> 6 . • • • j ' _ ~ i ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ I I ~ ~.._, I ~ ;I `~ - ~ ! r ~ ' 1, L~ i y ~~h u u , ~ ~ , ,; - li rr~~ V1 ~ r 6R e ~ ~ ~~ ~a~ ,~ ~1i ~11t i1i~ ~~~,~I~t r, ~~ :.- ~~~~~\ .f_,, ~:•. , 4 I / ` '' / ~ ~` ~~ 7 / f `` r / , ~~ !.Jill !1~ // . ~ \~~' `1\` ~ ~~ r, ~ ~~~ / / '~ 1~ I ~~J ~ - 1 .^' ~- a- ,~ 11 .s~.[E j {, 1IiEE~~,~~ ~~ ~ / ~ ~~ /~ ~ I /~ 1 ~r , , ~ m ~ A° P,y ~) lyy\ io~sU V ~ ~'' z o~ {,. ~~ ~11 ao aq X31,! ~~ \ ~;~ ,~ F E, o~ 7~ ) ,/ ~ awl ~ i ,, - / J~ ~ .~ ~~~~8 ; ~ ~~ ._. 1 •~ `` X3~ ~~ / ~. e _ ~~~~~ I.m ~ ~ I j~~ l~111; , I ~'{`~p ~ti1~~,ii ~I! U ^ ~ y~o ~»,bs* /'~ ~ o r-+ ~j ~ i ~ ~.~ ~=~1, ~r/~ i, ~ o ~;1~,~, - ~~~ ~ mall / , ~ ~, ~ 6 ,~, xtw %" ~ ~~~ ,,., ,,, j ~ ~ ~ :~~ ~ ~, ak ~;;%`+ , iii ~ t ~~r`~_ pg~~ ' g3~ ~(, ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ -~~ a f I ' >it ~, , , ;~j ~,% L~ ,~ \_ ~ ---- _ -`V,, ~~~; ~ ,~ i~ s~,fi Milli ~ ,' ! I a -~ • RESOLUTION NO 05-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING STREET NAME CHANGE DRC2005-00315, TO RENAME WOLFSON DRIVE TO COYOTE DRIVE FOR AN EXISTING STREET, ADJACENT TO DAY CREEK INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL, LOCATED NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The similanty in the way Wolfson Dnve and Wilson Avenue are pronounced make it necessary to effect a Street Name Change for Wolfson Drive, located north of Wilson Avenue, on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard, adtacent to Day Creek Intermediate School Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subtect Street Name Change is refered to as "the application " 2. On the 25th day of May 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng for the above-mentioned street rename proposal, Street Name Change DRC2005-00315, pursuant to the MuniGpal Code, Chapter 12.12 3. The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department prepared a report, which addressed the tustification for the change, recommended a street naming plan, provided replacement names, and . discussed the impacts of the recommended change. 4. All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, deternined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced meeting on May 25, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together month public testimony, this Commission hereby speGfically finds as follows a The Street Naming Ordinance establishes that street names should be pleasant sounding, appropnate, and easy to read (so that the public, and children ~n particular, can handle the name m an emergency situation) (RCMC 12 12 020(A)). Because of the similarity of how "Wolfson Dnve" and "Wilson Avenue" are pronounced, the Etiwanda School Distnct submitted a request to change the Wolfson Dnve street name to eliminate the potenfial for delivery problems, to prevent parents and community members fuming on the wrong street, and to prevent possible delays m emergency services b The Street Naming Ordinance establishes that similar sounding names ere considered to be a duplication, regardless of spelling (RCMC 12 12 020(E)) Because of the similanty m the way "Wolfson Drive" and "Wilson Avenue" are pronounced, Wolfson Dnve is considered a duplication of Wilson Avenue. ~. -5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-37 STREET NAME CHANGE DRC2005-00315 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • May 25, 2005 Page 2 c The Street Naming Ordinance establishes that street names should be appropnate and easy to read Because of the proximity of the street to Day Creek Intermediate School the Etiwanda School Distract proposed changing Wolfson Dnve to Coyote Dnve, which is representative of the school mascot d. Changing the street name to Coyote Dnve is appropnate because the street name is easily recognizable by the students, the street name is easy to read, the street name is easy to pronounce, and the street name should not be confusing in an emergency situation. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows a. The proposed change is not in conflict wdh the goals, polices, and standards of the general plan. b The proposed change is consistent wrath the adopted master plan of streets and highways or adopted crculation element c The proposed change will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. d. That the proposed change is deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. 4 This Commission hereby finds and determines that the protect identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves Street Name Change DRC2005-00315. 6 The street name change shall become offical on August 1, 2005. The City Planner shall send wntten notices of the change to the Post Office, County Clerk, Fire District, Sheriffs Department, and applicable utility companies at least 60 days pnor to the effective date of the change 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macas, Chairman ~- V PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-37 STREET NAME CHANGE DRC2005-00315 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 25, 2005 Page 3 ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planrnng Commission held on the 25th day of May 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES• COMMISSIONERS• ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS• C -7 T H E C I T Y O F RANC6O CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE. May 25, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Mike Smith, Assistant Planner SUBJECT' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM1ti445 -MARK CAPELLINO - A request to subdivide a 7.27 acre parcel into 10 parcels, with Parcel 2 for Condominium purposes, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street - APN 0209-211-19 Related Files: Development Review DRC2003-01185 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration BACKGROUND. This application was reviewed, along with related Development Review DRC2003-01185, on March 23, 2005 During the public hearing, the applicant, Mark Capelllno, indicated that the proposed parcel map submitted by his engineer erroneously showed a subdivision of the existing property Into 11 parcels Mr Capelllno stated that the parcel map should be for a subdivision Into 10 parcels and include the statement, "for Condominium purposes on Parcel 2 " The item was continued to April 27, 2005, in order for Mr. Capelllno to provide the revised tentative parcel map information and to allow the Environmental Assessment for the application to be re-circulated for review and possible comment The item was continued for a second time to May 25, 2005, because he did not have this information in time for staffs review. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zonino North - Industrial building/vacant land; General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 5) South - Industrial buildings, General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 5) East - Recycling facility, General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 5) West - Industrial buildings; General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 4) Item "D" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO • May 25, 2005 Page 2 B General Plan Designations Project Site -General Industnal North - Generallndustrial South - General Industrial East - Generallndustnal West - Generallndustnal C. Site Charactenstics• The protect site is a vacant parcel of about 7.27 acres in the General Industnal (GI) District (Subarea 5). The parcel is generally square in shape with its southwest quadrant removed and resembles an upside-down "L." It is about 665 feet wide (east to west) by 615 feet deep (north to south). In general, the protect site is bound on all sides by industrial development Some of the properties to the north are vacant. The properties to the north, south, and east are zoned General Industnal (GI) District (Subarea 5); and the properties to the west are zoned General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 4). The subtect property is generally level with no significant slopes. Vegetation on the site ~s limited to low grass and, at the south side of the site, a grouping of eight trees and miscellaneous shrubs. A north to south rail line spur is aligned along the east perimeter of the project site. Industnal related Vaffic is primarily served by 6th SVeet, which is classified a secondary road.. ANALYSIS. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 10 parcels ranging in size between 16,255 square feet (Parcel 6) and 51,996 square feet (Parcel 1). The revision of the Tentative Parcel Map, as noted above, only significantly affects Parcels 2 and 4 of the original version of the map (Exhibd E) The revision "eliminates" the proposed lot line that separated them and, as a result, also re-numbers all of the proposed parcels (Exhibit D). The overall project that was approved on March 23, 2005, including the site layout, the plotbng of the buildings, and architecture, wdl not be affected by these revisions. Shared access, parking, and maintenance easements will be incorporated in the parcel map. A. Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the overall protect on November 2, 2004. At that time, several architectural and landscape design issues were raised that the Committee indicated must be wrrected. The applicant revised the proposal, as requested, and resubmitted the plans for afollow- up review on February 1, 2005. The Committee recommended approval of these revisions Note that the revisions to the parcel map wdl not cause changes in the design aspects of the project. B Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee reviewed the protect on November 2, 2004. Because of a technical deficiency, the protect was not approved. However, the applicant was able to resolve the problem, and at the Grading Review Committee on February 1, 2005, the protect was subsequently approved. The Grading Review Committee recommended that the protect be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action Technical comments were provided to the applicant and have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. Note that the revisions to the parcel map will not cause changes in the grading or the technical aspects of the protect. .p-a. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 Page 3 C Environmental Assessment The original Irntial Study was completed and staff determined that, with Mitigation Measures, there would not be a significant adverse impact on the environment as a result of this protect Although none of the described changes substantially affect the environmental assessment that was completed for this protect, as the description of the protect changed, the Intial Study was re-arculated (Exhibd H). No additional comments or concerns were received. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public heanng in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within a 300-foot radws of the protect site No comments have been received RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions, and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad er City Planner BB MS\ma Attachments Exhibit "A" -Location Map ' Exhibit "B" - Aenal Photo Exhibit "C" -Site Utilization Map Exhibit "D" -Tentative Parcel Map 16445 (revised) Exhibit "E" -Tentative Parcel Map 16445 (original) Exhibit "F" -Planning Commission Staff Report dated Apnl 27, 2005 Exhibit "G" -Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 23, 2005 Exhibit "H" -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 U p3 ._ esanevcic ~ lI H{MINt°~VE i~~ "e'er iunmwtr :L5F4T ~ iMgtNWOR ,~ ~~~ _ _- .-S- . ___ ~CANNEl4M c ( ~ ALTA ~ LOYA B E YgY c C 1_ 9 n n ~ ~~ - _ ~ ~VALIE~~ YI4IA ~ ~ wee~o H ALiA LOYA ~ u ~ ~~„ , IYIiR 1_ ~NI~WO ~fiOJECT SITE t I O ~ ~ ~.~ ~M ~XI°°I I~IT `A' VINEYAgO ~i CW/Rl ~ l./O~ Cry HALL ~` ;® °Z 9 RANaiONCAMO 'O--_ ~J'INALPARK ,~, ~= ~• ~e .. A~ ._ - dV3~ ~ maKB AV6 ~• '~~ ~~ ~( ~~~ ~~ ~,a `' r-e»rrxe ~~ ~ wrf ~vi~ u~ 5 ~~ C* y t' Pt,• ~ ~~~ MM+ M ~' ~.w } •, ~.^ ~ry t v~~~ ~ 5 J ~~ t% ~~ . ~' ~N k' J t r`~4 ~i {r ~ti ~! y.~{Yt~ ~ x ! S ~.~j d'~`'~ 4.~ T YP ~ `~ f l• r 'E .: v! 4 l .,. y I r L Yc r i ~ ~. Sf ~ 1 ~. ` ~h 7`S'n~ t~ ~ 1 ~ ~' J ~f r `M ~ ~ $.. M ~` Sin x V S '' ~ Y { r p ~ 4 :.. ~ Y~ 5N i.4 ~ y+ i~ ~ r Y 4 xy'L Y ~' M1 i .. .. ,j ~~+~v h~ Y ~4*yt 'Ty1 §° ~•f yn ~ ~ ~ ` r yy~ ~R ~ 1 d ~ '. ~~ 5 }.r~ ~ '. ^ Y ~ / l ~ AJ s . + } ~x ey r r ~ + _ i4a ~ `t7 ,sr., g~x~ SSaa' ~ s w Yls'~ r ~}~'-~^r - t b •1 ah }t y 1 ~~ fi s ~-Itrv7x ,PYr ~~ +"iv~ q~ 'ti e . .. ~, ... PC i + ~1 j 11 yE .~ T Q v ` .f Y' . 4• P„ r _ ~ fyy 5 /Y• } 1 • ~ G ~ „y }~ P , ~i }} ~~ ~ ~ ° ~*r k ~ , ~ ',4: ~ r `~rs.1~C RY : 3 w w ' ' y p .`•~'T.sf~.~:Y2~F" x~. ~ v~aAY+ GrM~ AS { ~ . _ _z}fa l ,'~`';1 v,l `Th n^~9 /~ A ~~ . Yti~~~v~ _w f t%J /F s iii ~ l ~k, i e l•,S.t .~~f ? =:~ f''+Kr%3 h ~ ~ iv f .~r M G'r2Y.>1 . p5 5 Y Zv M+ 4 }$ EXHIBIT `B' L yytttt ~~.• ~~ tY .+ i r `. ~~ _ •~~ .. sea ~! ~~$~ ~j r 6 s & ~ ~ ~9~a~~ ~~~i ~ ~~~~E~~~~~~~~~~ r ~q~q ygp g~eaaeaeeP?P4~ ' ~f Eye .. ....es ac a $Z~ p§§+~+~e PPggP gPg gPg ggP4e PP Pgeg gPg e6: ~~6~~~£332~~~~~34 . ...._.. s=___!+ ~ ~ ~ ' f __-__-_____ _I ~ f 1 1 i ~ ' ~ ~ 1 I I 1 1_- ---- ~ ~ ;, ~' _ ~ I ~~ i~ ~~~~i ~ ~1 ~i ~ ~~~ iii 1 ~, 1 ;1 i 1 ~ i~ ~~ 1 II II ~I1 ~t1 I -t-~ r~ r t1 ~I C~~ ~ ~C d i, 1 ~~ ~~~~~~~ EXHIBIT `C' ~-~ ~~ ~~ ~~ U a o~ Z W W M '~ V! 2 c~ Z J 2 O Z 2 r~ ~J 2 W D a r=--------- 1 r< °°~ USWy 'O~8 Ow~'o Z~~o & ~ o_9a e/~:3 e`rc~a~ im=~° a K Jo'"~~' K nz°~~ ~=~=s f Oso `i~d~ _Z 81~~~~~ n=g~ ~ ~0~ FU=~ Fpm „Z= Y e~~ 9 ~~1~ ~~6i ~ 40~e `~ s'e 1 ~1~ ~ r ~ ~ ~~~ off' p~ ~i?(;q~' 8~A ire ~~t~~ Ir g l8i~ 6~ j~B? ~!~ ~~I S+i~ ~~0a u 1~1 1 lii~ p~il I~i3 1 ~'1 13i $iE" ~ ~~~~ i'te {9ir 0800+ [r~~ r. ~ r l r 0t r 0e rl.re 1 YY aaaaaaa ~~ e e dv' n lu ~ fn v 5 al ~tl 0 ~P8 0 _n 3__ d 1 o¢. s !a ~fd~ m v s ___` _ 1 ~ '~1' n ~ Pfa~= I aura r avu I I ~ wvnra I I _~,-_ ao.nv v w a rroa ou erw iavnrd z wvnrd '"10i .~ anrd v av =. "o.. arorv avsm III I n W< ~~ ~ W< 1 <p i I ~ ip ~~ I I 11j t I I __-__ I ~-- --~y ~U F aoV I W< W< I I un I ~~ <o ill°° I I------ I III Ilj I I III pj< °~ III I V~ ao i~ I ao I 6~ I I I III r__ L.-~ ~--- ---~ I~_ I wV II I J< I r-1 I Ve I I I I V~ ¢n ~~ I ~ I I I C. po tg I I I I u~ Spit III I I __ c ~ I l 1 ~~__ .u. 4 C__ `~~__ dU ~~~_ '~,-, VII I W < ¢oll f I c1m ~J2ot°I i I du . I I i _ ____ _ ___________________ 9 _ 9r_ __ ~~ ,r ~ h- ~~- ~ /r i ' n -- , , V ~ r ~ _ ~ ~ r";# a.°e i~ ,~ „_ ~s e~ ;~ i Wi WI OI I ~ ~ ~~. ~.~ ~ o. ~~~~~ ~~~F ~~~~ ~~~E ~¢~~ ~~~ W ~ w ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ _ ,~~~ ~~~ ~ o ~~~~~ 3 ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~$~~ ~ ~~~~ EXHIBIT `D' • ~< ~O *3~ Oa~~ Z~~~ O_ ~ ~¢ Jo~~~ ns°~ ~~ F~ t~~~ tlFzX ^ ([ i •r .a• iii \al ~, ~ ~ ~ (9~ ~t~ nisi ~l;~~ tl~ os Ilq t~ ~l~i ~ `,~ 9!, !~ II ~~0 ~ i~6 r• ~ C tl'p ~ t~i~ tl~i tI`7 t (,7 tIaf b ([I a..s-_:aes. vast as-• ee-•aix o g(a ~ i4dg Igdt I;di I~; i Ili ~ II~qq ~- - ~° ='- - a. a t t t ie a ie alae a YI t~~1 a- _ - a .aa a g' a3 8 B 6 9 B B 8 ,~ m ~, ~- i ' I ~ arra r aor ~ omiu •ewa •rroo wr arw •samune• w i I ~ I l 1[IIItlra I lra'a r 1QN C 109tlra yyyr yVyV I I innnar I I ~ "~ ,-~-~ I I ~--~ o . 5 I I I I I p< sm ' I¢n ° ¢°• 1 I ' i I <C I I<p ~ <O I I I I 6 ,a [ 4 I 14 ~ o ~ I I I I d.< ~ I L -ear - ~ „r _'--- __~ d------~ e-- ~ r '_ m oc, i ~I I ~,r- 11d ~< I I ¢K °- 2 ~ I ~I v ~ ¢i tP! o° I~i oa ~ ~ ~ d°~ o; I I "------ --~~ ---- -- - -~ --- -----~ -~ -------- ----- - ---~I-:= e ~ ~ pq i _ ___ ____________ _____ i I I ~ I I ~ i I I ~It < I . tl.r III R Ys ~ 1 Ile = ~~ i; i ~i r o. ~ 1 ¢o ~ 6 ~ ~ ¢.- I I o.' ~il I Y 4 u' I I 66 py o- I ---~ - I I ~ ~ r ~ r__ L_-~ ~ ~d~a. ~--- ---~ '- !t°~~ r e >~ ~t ~ ,, ~ -~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ #~~g~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~9=~ ~~~ g ~~ E~ ~ ~9t ~ t ~g~t ~ , ~~t ~ ~Q t ~,}~~E 3 ~~~~ ~I~ ~'tt ~ ~s~~ ~ ~~I~ EXHIBIT `E' ~~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: April 27, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner gy Mike Smith, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPEL'LINO - A request to subdivide a 7.27 acre parcel into 11 parcels In the General Industrial Dlstnct (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street - APN. 0209-211-19. Related Files• Development Review DRC2003- 01185 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804. Staff has prepared a • Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from March 23, 2005) . BACKGROUND: On March 23, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted a public heanng for this item in conjunction with Development Review DRC2003-01185. During Me meeting, the applicant, Mark Capelllno, stated that the proposed parcel map erroneously showed a subdivision of the existing property into 11 parcels. He indicated that he wanted to amend the tentative parcel map to show a subdivision into 10 parcels Furthermore, he wanted to include text on the map document stating that Parcel 2, specificelly, Is for industrial condomlruum purposes. Only Parcels 2 and 4 of the onginal version of the map are sign~cenUy affected by the described changes. These revisions remove the proposed lot line that separated them and, as a result, also renumbers all of the proposed parcels. However, since the advertisement and circulated public not~cetion must be consistent with these changes, the Assistant City Attorney, Mr. Kevin Ennis, advised the Planning Commission to continue the item until April 27, 2005, to allow it to be re-advertised and the related environmental documents be re-circulated acxordingly. The applicant was directed to submit the revised tentative parcel map and related documentation for staffs review in the meantime The applicant recently provided the required Information and the revised environmental documents were circulated on Apnl 20, 2005. The revised descnption well be re-advertised for the May 25, 2005, Planning Commission meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue Tentative Parcel Map SUTPM16445. The revised protect descnption will be placed on the May 25, 2005, Planning Commission agenda. Respectfully submitted, • Brad uller City Planner Item "B" EXHIBIT `F' ~-~ T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA StaffReport DATE: March 23, 2005 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner gy; Mlke Smith, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO - A request to subdivide a 7.27 acre parcel into 11 parcels in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street - APN: 0209-211-19 Related Files• Development Review DRC2003-01185 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Decaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO: A request to develop 11 Industrial office/warehouse buildings totaling 126,843 square feet on 7.27 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th SVeet -APN: 0209-211-19. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental Impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North -Industrial Building /vacant land; General Indusrial (GI) District, Subarea 5 South - Industrial Buildings; General Industnal (GI) District, Subarea 5 East - RecyGing Facility; General Industnal (GI) District, Subarea 5 West -Industrial Buildings General Industnal (GI) District, Subarea 4 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - Generallndustrial South - General industrial East - General industrial . yyest - Generallndustrial EXHIBIT `G' D-io PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics. The project site is a vacant parcel that is generally square in shape with its southwest quadrant removed and resembles an upside-down "L." It is about 665 feet wide (east-west) by 615 feet deep (north-south). The protect site is bound on all sides by industrial development. To the north some of the properties are vacant. The properties to the north, south, and east are zoned General Industral (GI) District, Subarea 5; the properties to the west are zoned General Industnal (GI) District, Subarea 4. The subject property is generally level with no significant slopes. Vegetation on the site is limited to low grass, and at the south side of the site there is a grouping of eight Vees and miscellaneous shrubs. A north-south rail line spur is aligned along the east perimeter of the project site. Industrial related Vaffic is pnmanly served by 6th Street, which is ctassified a secondary road (Exhibd E). D. Parkins Calculations: Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Tvoe of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Building 1 14,141 pffce 3,316 1/250 13 Warehouse 10,825 1/1000 11 Total 24 24 Budding 2 6,933 Office 4,270 1/250 17 Warehouse 2,663 1/1000 X20 19 Total Building S 10,159 Office 2,250 1/250 9 Warehouse 7,909 1/1000 17 19 Total Building 4 7,423 Office 4,270 1 /250 17 Warehouse 3,153 1/1000 2U 21 Total Building 5 7,392 Office 1,752 1 /250 7 Warehouse 5,640 1/1000 13 14 Total U p- I I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 3 Building 6 6,427 Office 1,865 1/250 7 Warehouse 4,562 1/1000 5 Total 12 14 Building 7 10,669 pffce 2,796 1/250 11 Warehouse 7,873 1/1000 8 Total '19 15 Building 8 6,761 Office 1,569 1/250 6 Warehouse 5,192 1/1000 5 Total 11 12 Building 9 10,971 Office 2,060 1/250 8 Warehouse 8,911 1/1000 9 Total 17 24 Building 10 21,317 Office 5,020 1/250 20 Warehouse 16,297 1/1000 16 Total 36 38 Building 11 24,650 pffice 4,840 1 /250 19 Warehouse 19,810 1/1000 20 Total 39 39 Total (ALL) 228 237 `Shared parking, access, and maintenance have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. ANALYSIS: A. Gene I: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 11 parcels ranging in size between 16,255 square feet (Parcel 6) and 51,996 square feet (Parcel 1), and construct a building on each parcel. Note that Buildings 2 and 4; 3 and 5; 6 and 8; and 7 and 9 will be separated only by their respective walls (no apparent space between them); therefore, the site nail appear to have only seven budd~ngs (Exhibit D). All of the buildings will be constructed of concrete tilt-up panels. Key architectural elements and features include a form-lined concrete band on all elevations, extensive spandrel/vision glass at the office D-~~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 4 corners and along the wall planes adiacent to pnmary building entrances, cornices, and articulated towers and parapets. Although architecturally similar, each budding will incorporate different design attributes that favor specific types of tenants. The design and layout of Buildings 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9 are relatively small, with the exception of the roll-up doors, and will most likely be occupied by office tenants The other remaining buildings are larger and have truck-loading docks incorporated into their design. Additionally, as required by Section 17.30 of the Development Code, regarding rail service, because Buldings 1, 3, and 5 are situated along the existing rail line, their design incorporates knock-out panels for potential future rail service, via a rail spur constructed by others. The site has two access points (one pnmary and one emergency) from 6th Street. Truck parking and loading areas are located out-of-wew from the public right-of-way. These areas v~nll be screened by walls and gates or by the building themselves. Employee/visitor parking will be located throughout the site. A. Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Coleman) reviewed the project on November 2, 2004. At that Ume, several architectural and landscape design issues were raised that the Committee indicated must be corrected (Exhibit I). The applicant revised the proposal, as requested, and resubmitted the plans for afollow-up review on February 1, 2005. The Committee recommended approval of these revisions (Exhibit J). B. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee reviewed the proled on November 2, 2004. Because of a technical defiGency, the project was not approved. However, the applicant was able to resolve the problem, and at the Grading Revew Committee on February 1, 2005, the project was subsequently approved. The Grading Review Committee recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Technical comments were provided to the applicant and have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. C. Environmental Assessment: The Initial Study was completed, and staff determined that, with Mitigation Measures there would not be a significant adverse impact on the environment as a result of this protect. In the short-term, there will be construction related air quality and noise impacts. long-tern impacts inGude the removal or relocation of the ewsUng trees (related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804) and minor changes in drainage and hydrology. The loss of the Vees that cannot be relocated will be mitigated by the proposed landscaping throughout the site, which inGudes eight Vees of vanous speaes. Additional mitigation measures will minimize the impact of the changes in the on-site drainage and hydrology. Staff recommends issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vailev Dailv Bulleti newspaper, the properly was posted, and notices were mailed to all propeAy owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. i p-~3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM16445 AND DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO March 23, 2005 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions, and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. R/espectfully submitted, Brad er City Planner BB:MS/ge Attachments• Exhibit °A° - Location Map Exhibit °B" - Aenal Photo Exhibit °C° - Site Utilization Map Exhibit °D° - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit °E° - Site Plan Exhibit "F° - Grading and Cross-Sections Exhibd 'G° - Building Elevations and Floor Plans Exhib~t'H° - Landscape Plan Exhibit 'I' - Design Review Committee Action Minutes, November 2, 2004 Exhibit 'J° - Design Review Committee Action Minutes, February 1, 2005 Exhibk'K' - Initial Study Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2003-01185 -~~ . ENVIRONMENTAL - "~,-: ~.' INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) City of aancno Cucamonga (Please type or prin(clearly using ink Use the tab key to move /rom one line to the next line I Planning Omsran (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports maybe required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility o/the appNCant to ensure that the appllcalion is complete at fhe Line of submittal, Clty staN will not be evadable to peAorm wor r required to provide missing inlormahon M/y~~~. Qr Application Number /or the protect to which this form pertains Lily Z~~~~~!/7 ~~ to 4s Prolecl Tdle h ry .~r,~~T 1NONS7RiAL )'Qo /tCT Name 8 Address of protect owner(s) F/f// /aid Cr1r7N6 - •/6S/ Sr»rE sT Nb./~r1i9i,P Name & Address of developer or protect sponsor -~q~y~ r75 ABa/E - EXHIBIT ' ~' 1~nibal Study PaA1 docpage 1 '\ - ~ S Rev 6/30/03 .~ Contact Person B Address Mt-7R,1 LrgPLU/~/O - 20r~ DEL AMO 8L/D S/iT£ /OS • ' ro,~aNCC G9 40Soi Name 8 Address of person preparing this /omr (d ddteren! from above) ~ S/EMI- /+~S •7L3o/E Telephone Number 3/O ~/~-'/F~/~ '7J Provide a /ull scale (8-1/2 x 11 J copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pro/ec! site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views into and )rom the site from the primary access points that serve the sde, and representative views of s~gmficent features Irom the site Include a map showing location oI each photograph 3J Protect Location (describe) S,8/O SixT~ Sr>~tr Rr~ifCMO G~''9rn^/~/~ of i~Q~il~~~GD H/~T eF NE7 No~Zsr~ S.aE or Sixrhl 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach addrt~onal sheet d necessary) oZo9 • Z// -/9 ~ G~ •SJ Gross SdeArea (ac/sq HJ 7 z7 f7C 3/d BS9 Set FT '6J Net S/te Area (total site s¢e minus area o/public streets 8 proposed dedications) 6 9S AG 302 (06 7 ,~ F!. 7) Descnbe.anyproposedganeral plan amendment or zone change wh/ch would affect the pro)ec! ste (attach addrfional sheet d necessary) Noi/e r7PL~lit /T lL-[/E/t5 PZoR•x~0 VRoJEGT /S Co.~dcSA9n/T' ///rN eSe~/c,e'}~L PL~~i/ * GdR Qri/T Zo~JiiJb u PLANN~NG~FINAI~FORMS~COUNTER\~niUal Study Part? docPage c Rev 6/30/03 Intormat~on /nd~cated by an asterisk (') /s not required o)nonconstruchon CUP's unless otherwise requested by stall 8) Include a descnption oI all perms which wdl be necessary from the City o/Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies in order to /ully implement the pro/act • 6 ~ P/du W.9rr~ • ScnrE~' • Sr,~A^f DiZ'~uV . r ,v.s~~ rv.,i.c.~ --~..• Sro r, f/NOraS.?a//J/~ FoPC SP,1ii/,!~(E.~ • O/r.~/~u~D FiiZC 5,~2/.~/rLIX g) Descnbe the physical setting of the ske as h exists before the protect including informatton on topography, soil stabildy, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Deswibe any existing shuctures on site (mcludmg age and condition) and the use oI the structures Attach photographs of significant features descnbed In addrt~on, cite all sources o/information (1 e , geological and/orhydrologic studies, biotic andarcheological surveys, traffic studies) G/,Zrr~.r'r SirE r5 /r~G~NT Sire iS Ri_/~7rivLcY FLAT NrrN SutNT .fLoPt T n/c do/rNH/,~T SoitS l~R~A/2 ~n'~ A.JD lor/6~5r~i./T NrN orNE..' iyi~'E~~S Wi>7y/.V TNc Grp' ~i Sln/it~~i7NT ~'!/>'NlZ O.Z /ir/,.yi~LS A.~ r~P17r2r~/T Scr/,s N4~7d1Z£ ..,, rx sr ai rh,E ~.SrF.~U' .~,zna/ of riiE r TN,Fr?e A,zc No EX Sru/6 .Sit'/cniiZi~ S oN r)IE C~ra_,ZTY T/yL /?C' /~~ Nb ,~i/Or'Vi/ TRi~I/ s .~ii~iOS D.~i7i~JA6,~ !OV'a~~ ~G o _ ~ f O) Descnbe the known cultural and/orhistonca/aspects oIthe sde Crte all sources ofinformatron (books, pubbshed repots and ore/ history) . r7 - OF ~ . - p-'~ Rev S/30/03 I ~pLANNING~FINALIFORMSCOUNTER\Imhal SWdy Pant docPage 3 11) Descnbe any noise sources ano~tfielrlevels that now af/ect the sde (airoraR, roadw~noue, ek) and how they wAl a/led proposed uses: TiyE,~c IS No ,wo./~,. so/a' -t of n6,~ti - FxGEPT Excsr~// Ror~.Dr+/!>'Y ~G'" Sr,12r,Lr~ /~/o rMTi~CT r~PcGT~ 12) Descnbe the proposed pro/ed m detail This should pronde an adequate descnphon otthe site in terms o/uPomate use that wdl result /rom the proposed proJed Indicate h there am proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anhdpated completion o/each increment. Attach adddlonal sheet(s) !/ necessary.' ,y7p~Gr.~i/T is P~iN6 // .TAD/srvAL ~Mr7r//Fi7oT.~in~/ D157~iB~.~ B//LO/NIiS CoNS17?~rnonJ ~ Q'L/I? /N O~J.~` /~NdSE !~! r/d lcwir2ETOn/ N/ir/srii/ oNc YGi3~' of far~wlc.nK.~r~Jr of Grs:Sn3Cr~t+'/ • 13J Descnbe the surrounding properties, Including lnlormadon on plants and aroma/sand any cultural, histodcal, orscenk aspects. Indicate the type of land use (res~denhal, commercial, ek.), intensdy o/land use (one-tamlly, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.J and scale of development (height homage, setback, rear yard, etc.) T/fr f/i2a~bri~/GVn/~ P.~~c.~2ri~ "A,~E G£.y~'-0•x. Lroys7~aAL n>'EdG /s NO riyDAr2~/r ~/~/.~Zr7L //isro.OlJJ~ o.Z ScrNic i5 ' ~ P/.~~n/ri./l, APyE13~ To B~ Orla.~~ By T/>'E !~rY 14) Will the proposed proJed change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area o/the projed9 //o AayECr /S ~.,ossn3.,ir ./irt/ l/~i~r .JE/rloi'M.r~/~ • I WLANNING~FINALIFORMSICAUNTERUmha1 SWdy Pant docPage 4 ~ V' ~ ~~• 6/30/03 • ' 15) le ~els affect ad scent prop Res and ont site uses? Wh ~ methtods o/ soul ndproofing are proposed9 w wdl these nase PROJ iS SP6C //o ds~ /~/~/r BEEN ion=~yr~Pi n dVgJ<~i/r LbtS n/or i~~vri<.ir~rE An/Y /',~?-'~`-*5 /n/ TNi< ,v'Ei '15) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees .SoMI' T/2Er~ Witt. //,EtD TO ,l~r .t~tnf0/c~ i~~PL4~iJT r/r)S ~ON7,Pi#c~G"t~ {4brN .=Pv 17) Indicate any hod~es o/water (mcludmg domesbc water suppbes) mto whrch the site drams 18) Indicate expected amount o/water usage (See Attachment A /or usage estimates) For /urther cladtlcatlon, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distdd at 987-2591 a. Residential (gaUday) Peak use (gavoay) b. CommerdaUlnd (ga4day/ac) ~aao Peak use (gaUm/n/ac) 19J Indicate proposed method o/ sewage disposal ^ Septlc Tenk ~ Sewer. tl sepbc tanks are proposed, attach peroolabon tests /I discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indcate expecteddailysewagegenere8on' (SeeAttachmentAtorusageesbmates). FortuRherdanficatlon,pleasecontedfhe Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Resldenbal (gaUday) b CommeroialrlndusMal (gaUday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Numbero/resklentla/units• De a had (mdkate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size end maximum lot size . Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): Rev. 6/30103 IiPLANNING~FINAL~FORMS~COUNTERUnitlal S4dy Pant doCPa9e S 21) Anticipated range o/sale pnce~androrrents ~ Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Speci/y number of bedrooms by unit type 23) Indicate enbapated household sue by unit type 24) Indicate the expected number o/school children who Kell be residing within the pro/ed Contact the appropriate School DisMds as shown /n Attachment B• a Elementary.' • b. Junror High. c. Senla High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type o/use(s) and ma/orfuncbon(s) o/commerGa/, lndushtal orJnstftutlonal uses: ~j~JCGT 28) Total floor area o/commercial, industrial,, or instrtubona/ uses by type: Tvn~L t/-~.z i~~£A /Z8. S/2Z SQ Fr 1•vaVss.PN~L 27) Indicate hours of operatlon: /NA~fO~/i/ - N 1i7~?ifheE< RtQ/c 57~D 28) Number of employees: Totah. /i/~Nv//~/ Maxmum Shl/t.• Time o/Maximum Sh/lt: l'~ 11PLANNING~FINAL~FORMSI000NTERUnitfal Study PaR1 docPage 6 {,J ~ O Rev. 6/30/03 29) Provide breakdown oranhapated/ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an mdlcahon of the rate of • hire for each classrficahon (attach addrhonal sheet d necessary) N,t~Nav 30) Estlmabon or the number o/workers to be hired that currendy reside In the City '31) For commeroral and rndustnal uses only, Indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be venlied through the South Coast Arr Quality Management Distract, at (818) 572-6283): t/~/tIJOS/ ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agendas sennng the pro)ect been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate semce to the proposed prorectT I/so, please lnd~cate their response ADpuG •/i#S s/.9O ~~//,E,@SA1~~K //rt! AGL No A~I'i7c=t.~/l' art+~e ~b8iri.-X S~/~~ 33) In the known history o/this propeAy, has there been any use, storage, or discharge or hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples o/hazardous and/ortoxic matenals include, but ere not llmded to PCB's; red~oacdve substances; pes6ddesand herbicides; reels, oils, solvents, and other flammable I~qulds and gases. Also note underground storage ofany o/the above Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, stoage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates or use, h known /1~0 pay ~.~3 I ~pLpNNING~FINALIFORMS7C~UNTERVnidal Study Pant docPage 7 • 34J Wdltheproposedprolectrnvol~thetemporaryorlong-term use,storage,ordisc~rgeothazardousand/ortox~cmatenals, including but not Irmded to those examples listed above? 1I yes, prowde an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location o/such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans I hereby certdy that the statements lumished above and in the attached exhibits present the date and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro(ect to the best o1 my ab!lrfy, that the facts, statements, and rn/omrabon presented are true and correct tot he best o/my knowledge and belre% 1 iuRher understand that additional rn(ormation may be required to be submitted be/ore en adequate evaluation can be made by the/City o/Rancho Cucamonga. /~/ Date. A~(L 6 7~b~/ Signature: v True owr/t~S - .t~Ei~fi\/Ti~T//t I WLANNING1fINAL1FORMSI000NTERUniaal Sludy PaR7 docPage 8 ~ ~ Rev 6/30/03 •r, 1 1~/ o ~ ~ A ~ ~ 1 ~ i __ ~ ~ "j. • :1123 ...~ A. ~ ~ ~ ul ~_'~I}OJ .. y~ 'VI`II •• I+ ,r-r-~--~4 5/ 59 i J Well ~ I 0 ~ I . ~~ ~l~~ D ~~ /~ - 7 --- ~I:~o /•~ T~^' -1~ `~ 1 ~~ /~I 11-: ~_ ~~ -.=z..l~~ - - ~„ ~_ _~~Dao _= ' .. . 9)O = `~_ ~ .' tl ~ ~ ~~~ tl ~ ~ 31~ II ~ ~ n ~ j ~ « 14_.. n ' ~ ii City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project Fde: Development Review DRC2003-01185 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 2. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2003-00680 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO - A request to subdivide a 7 27 acre parcel into 10 parcels, with Parcel 2 for Condominium purposes, in the General Industnal District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street -APN 0209-211-19 Related Files Development Review DRC2003-01185 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2003-01185 -MARK CAPELLINO - A request to develop 11 industrial office/warehouse bwldings totaling 126,843 square feet on 7.27 acres of land in the General Industnal District (Subarea 5), located at 9850 6th Street -APN 0209-211-19 4. Protect Sponsor's Name and Address: Mark Capellino Cap Brothers ConsVuction 2020 Del Amo Boulevard, Swte 105 Torrance, CA 90501 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial 6. Zoning: General Industnal (GI) DisVct, Subarea 5 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site is bound on the east, west, and south by industrial development The property to the north is vacant All surrounding properties are zoned General Industnal (GI) Distract, Subarea 5 The property is generally level with no significant slopes A north-south rad line spur is aligned along the east perimeter of the protect site Sixth Street is classified as a Secondary road and serves primarily Industnal-related traffic 8. Lead Agency Name and Address• City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10) Other agenaes whose approval is required (e.g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement)• None ~ a~ Initial Study for DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Qualty Control Board SCAOMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a °Potentially Significant Impact,' °Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,' or'Less Than Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (/) gesthetics (/) Biological Resources () Agncuttural Resources (/) Guttural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Geology/Soils ()Hazards & Hazardous (/) Hydrology/Water Quality ()Land Use/Planning Matenals ()Energy and Mineral Resources () Population/Housing ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise () Transportation/Traffic ()Public Services ()Recreation () Utilities/Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Signrficance DETERMINATION On the basis of this inltial evaluation: () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a Signrficant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (.7 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect In this case because revisions In the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a °Potentially Signrficant ImpacP or 'Potentially Signrficant Unless Mitigated' impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but d must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a sign'rficant effect on the environment, because all potentially signific nt effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION p ant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pur ant to tha i EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mdigatio easure that ed upon t e proposed protect, nothing fun~r~tt~her is required. Prepared By: Date: lJr ~8 i / Date: ~ ~~ Reviewed By: D-a~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 3 . Leu ~ Siprufitant Leaa Issues and Supporting Information Sources gtn firalnt M,t ~tYan SigNfimnl No i n i tea i a i a EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, O O O (/) but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing wsual character () () () (/) or quality of the site and its suroundings~ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to the General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect stte contains no scenic resources and no historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located at the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, and is characterized by industrial developments to the east, west, and south Although the property to the north is vacant, the property immediately beyond it to the north is developed for industrial use as well The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this prolect Design review is regwred prior to approval Ctty standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The pro/ect will create new light and glare because the site is curcently vacant The design and placement of light fixtures will regwre review for consistency wdh the City standards The impact is not considered significant 1) Light standards and fixtures shall be designed to ensure that illumination is confined within the project site Glare shall be minimized by shielding, diffusers, or use of indirect lighting. A Photometric Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/ ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) ConFlict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or () () () (/) a Williamson Act contract • p~.~o • Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less man S,gnfinnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g vctenuany $IBrvfitant w,ln iNtlpabOn man SIBNflranl No I d In !M I cl I d c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments. s a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located at the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, and is characterized by industrial developments to the east, west, and south Although the property to the north is vacant, the property immediately beyond it to the north is developed for indusVial use as well There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed pro/ect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The site is located at the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, and is characterized by industrial developments to the east, west, and south Although the property to the north is vacant, the property immediately beyond it to the north is developed for industrial use as well The nearest agricultural land is about 1/4 mile to the west-southwest of the pro/ect site at the southwest comer of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated • 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect. a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase () () () (/) of any criteria pollutant for which the pro/ect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create ob/ectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people '~~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Loss Than 9gnfiwnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potenfially Sipmfiwnt v"m MNpatlan man Signifiwnl No I ci Inc tM I d I d Comments• a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development well contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers with equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed pertormance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. r~ i D ~- $ i Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 ~~,~ SIpNR®nl Lma Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g vaenRaly Sigrvfiont wnn MlUgatlon mRn Signfitanl No I d Inro leo I a I p • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adtacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 8) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PMfio emissions, fn accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWt7CB) shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 98 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut oN equipment when not in use. After Implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR (Final Environmental Impact Report), Nox (Nitrogen Oxides), ROG (Reactive Organic Gases), and PM~R (Fine Particulate Matter) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant If they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant If they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. p-a9 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 7 Less Tian Slgrnfimnl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g PotenOally SlgMfipnt WIN MIUSpUan Than Signiflont No I a Inco letl I a I a 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide increase In operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse Impact for which a statement of overriding conditions was ultimately adopted by the Clty Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels In the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the Citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed Is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant Impacts If they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants Identified In SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is surrounded by industrial development, however, Is located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors single-family residences approximately 13 mile to the west along Archibald Avenue Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super- Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse Impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species In local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian () () () (/) habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service r1 f•_J kJ_JjD Irntial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 ~~~ S6nlfiwnt Loa Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°""'s0y Sipnfifanl ""'" Afitlpatlm ~" 9prdflmnt No i a i yea i a i c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any () () () (/) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local polices or ordinances () () (/) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with mdustnal uses The site has been previously disrupted during (construction of infrastructure and surcounding developments/annual disang for weed abatement) According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development wdl not adversely affect rare or endangered speces of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surcounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect wdl not have any impacts c) No wetland habdat is present on the sde As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The matonty of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticpated e) There are eight trees on the protect site that would regwre removal to construct the proposed protect, therefore, the proposed protect is in conflict with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit (Related file DRC2004-00804) and Arborist Report dated July 20, 2004, prepared by Steve F Andresen Arbonst Services that describes the health of the trees and identifies opportunities for preservation Of the eight trees, only two trees can be successfully transplanted The protect design proposes extensive landscaping with at least 20 percent of the tree planting schedule comprised of 24-inch box size or larger trees Therefore, the impact is considered less-than-significant 1) The applicant shall relocate the Washmgtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified as Trees #1 and #2, respectively, on the Site Plan submitted with the Arbonst Report, to suitable D -31 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 9 Less ilwn Slgnifimnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources s9b ®i M. ~~ o~ s~ ®m No i a i~ tea i n i n locations on-site. The new locattons of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval. ~ The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans wdl occur 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) signtficence of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 51 c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique () (/) () ( ) paleontological resource or sde or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those () () () (/) interred outside of formal cemeteries? Comments• a) The protect sde has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Muniapal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archeological saes or resources recorded on the protect sde, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 511) Construction actrvdy, particularly grading, sod excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mittgation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. e Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. e Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. e Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original ~~ I•_J p 3a Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Sig,tlflmnl Leas Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g vmennany Slgnifionl wu, Mitlgatlon man Signfimnt No I q Into ted I cl I cl illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 tt) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the prolect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modem man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The prolect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by (construction of infrastructure, surrounding developments, and annual discing for weed abatement) No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (~) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 D -33 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 11 Less Then Slpmfl®M Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g P°'"11a°'' S~9Mfipnt `"" Mitipatlon '~° Sigmflant No 1 ci I 1e4 I tl I cl u) Strong seismic ground shakmg4 O O O (/) uQ Seismic-related ground failure, mcluding O O O (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of () (/) () ( ) topsoil c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is () () () (/) unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the protect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the () () () (/) use of septic tanks or aitemative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hdl Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red HIII Fault, passes about 1 75 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 75 miles to the northwest These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is about 8 miles northeasterly of the site, and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is about 10 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is subtect to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this protect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~p emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~p emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~p emissions from the site during such episodes. p-3~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Sigrvfieant Leu Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP 9 FWentlally Signifinnt wnn MlUgabon man Signifimnl No I d Into letl I d 1 ct 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The matority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically stable No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the pro/ect. () () () (/) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous matenals7 b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sties compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a signfcant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area? f) For a protect wdhm the wcmrty of a pnvate airstnp, O O O (/) would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect areal g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with O O O (/) an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? n Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 13 Less Tian Sipnlfl®nt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources s~ ~~~; Mlupa4on sib ~n~ Nc ~moact Inwippatatl brad Inpacl h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wiidlands~ Comments• a) The Cdy participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and schools No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City particpates in a countywide interagency coaltion that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less than significant The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 0 25 mile of the protect site The protect site is located about 0 3 mile from a private school, including preschool, (Pebbles Christian School) at 7690 Archibald Avenue Also, the site is located about 0 5 mile south of the nearest existing or proposed public school (Rancho Cucamonga Middle School) at 10022 Feron Boulevard The proposed buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no defimtrve users at this time However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surcounding residential uses and elementary schools No impacts are anticpated d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticpated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public arport The protect site is located approximately 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 5 miles to the west of the Citys westerly I~mits No impact is anticpated D-~~O Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Then 9gNRmnt Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Fotmtla~Iy SIgNRCant `"" Mihpetl"n Tnen SlgNflnnt No Impea Incorporated. Impea liryaa g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is regwred to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire Distract Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed protect site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the protect. a) Violate any water quality standards or waste () () () (/) discharge requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () (/) () ( ) interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or aver, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surtace runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would () () () (/) exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () ( ) as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () ( ) structures that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () ( ) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including Flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp Q ~~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 • Less Than SlgniflatM Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~g„nemni Mi ~tlan SIgNB®nt Ho i a i gee i a i a Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ (~) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct (CVWD) and will not affect water quality standards or waste discharge requvements The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater m the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing agwfer, estimated to be about 286 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development Citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities The following mdigation measure shall be implemented 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be Integrated into the • design of the project where appropriate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and backs, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage pattems, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flaws. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Offical and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result m flooding on- or off-sde No impacts are antiapated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff due to the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the Flows The protect will not result in substantial additional . sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Budding Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in Flooding on or off-site No impacts are antiapated D ~g L Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Lass Than Slgniflranl lass Issues and Su Ortln Information Sources PP g Poten4ally Sgrvflont WIN MNgiOOn Then Siptlfl®nt No I~aa Incoryoratetl I a 1 a f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is more than 1 acre, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) Prior to Issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMPj, including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2000. L 3) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (l.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 4) Loading docks must be kept in a clean and orderly condition through a regular program of sweeping and litter control and immediate cleanup of spills and broken containers. 5) Below grade loading docks for warehouse/distribution centers of fresh food items will drain through water quality inlets, or to an engineered system, or an equally effective alternative. 6) Building and grounds maintenance includes care of landscaped areas around the facility, cleaning of parking lots and pavement, and the cleaning of the stone drainage system. 7) Outdoor storage of items primarily used by the tenant shall be discouraged. In the event that outdoor storage cannot be avoided, the materials shall be kept in areas originally designed and designated for storage. 8) Outdoor storage of materials for rehabilitation, remodeling, and improvements shall be placed in designated areas at the time the work is to be done. An area of the site shall be selected, away from drainage structures, and on a paved surface. The areas shall be isolated by use of erosion control measures, such as sandbags, plastic sheeting, and the creation of drainage dikes to collect any runoff from the area Smaller materials, such as drums, paints, chemicals, and tools shall be kept in a covered area Larger materials such as lumber shall be raised above the ground and securely covered with heavy plastic sheeting that will be resistant to tear in the event of heavy winds. 9) Trash containers shall be covered at all times. The exterior of the containers and the area surrounding the containers shall be kept clean of debris Inspection shall be on weekly basis by the person responsible for the maintenance of the p-3`~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 17 • Less Than Signfl®M Leu Issues and Supporting Information Sources s,~;fl®ni ~u ~nan s~~ ®m r+e I U m lee i i site. Spills shall be cleaned immediately and shall be done with the appropriate cleaning materials. All drainage from the building and pavement shall be diverted away from the trash container area. Budding roof drams shall be connected to the underground storm dram system or adjoining pavement drains located away from the trash container area. Trash container areas shall be screened or walled to prevent off-site transportation of trash. g) No housing units are proposed with this protect No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected i) The Ranchc Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year stone event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground stone drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the protect a) Physically divide an established wmmunity~ O O O (`~) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation () () () (/) plan or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) The site is located at the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, and is characterized by IndusVial developments to the east, west, and south Although the property to the north is vacant, the property immediately beyond it to the north is developed for industrial use as well This project will be of similar design and size to the industrial development to the south and west The project will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The protect site land use designation is General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 5. As the protect is located adtacent to an existing railroad line, the site layout and the individual design of the buildings incorporates features that allows future rail access and use, including a Q ~d Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Polentlally 9gniflonl with Mlagatlan Than Signiflcent No i a i tea i i a dedicated area for the potential construction of a rail spur The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not intertere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no Impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals due to the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the protect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ~) ~) () ~/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally ~) ~) ~) ~/) important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specfic plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no Impact f~J 11 NOISE Would the protect result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise ~) ~'~) ~) ~ ) levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ~) ~) ~) ~/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ~) () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect d) A substantial temporary or penodic increase in ~) ~/) O ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the protect? e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan ~) ~) ~) ~/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels D-~~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 ~~ ~ 9prYfifPn1 Less Issues and Supportng Information Sources sPoi~nm~i wv hem 9p mnfi ~ rm ~ i ma i i f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, O O O (~) would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The protect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. The City's Development Code requves that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed budding, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected The general Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible In first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts due to the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. l__J ~.J b) The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative Nnth no definitive users at this time The City's Development Code requves that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed budding, hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby commercial • uses is expected However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools As such, no impacts are anticipated p -~a • Initial Study for SItRTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Tlwn sigufiont Las Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~~m r.u~,n s~Q~ie®m rb i ke ~ i a c) The pnmary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not antiapated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vianity of the protect d) See a)response above e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Avport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is antiapated f) The nearest pnvate airsVip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated • 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the protect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, () () () (/) either dvectly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and wtll not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not atfract new employees to the area Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees, hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a matonty of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated , b) The protect site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated • 13 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the protect result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental faalities, need for new or physically altered govemmental faaldies, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other pertormance obtectrves for any of the public services () () () (/) a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? O O U (/) c) Schools? O O O (/) p-c~3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 21 ~~ s+a+eaa im, Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pdmtlaly a~,~rciaun WiM n~u~om 7nan ssnn®a ra ~ a In tea ~ ~ d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? () () () (/) Comments: a) The site, located on the north side of 6th Street, east of Archibald Avenue, would be served by the San Bernardino Road Fire Station #2 located to the north about 2 miles from the protect site at 9612 San Bernardino Road. The protect will not regwre the construction of any new faalities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilties Standard conddions of approval from the Unrfonn Bwlding and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect sde is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School Distnct and Chaffey Joint Umon High School Distnd The protect will be requred to pay School Fees as prescnbed by State law pnor to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park (Golden Oak Park) (s located less than 0.5 mile to the west of the protect site at 9345 Golden Oak Road. The protect Nall not require the construction of any new faalities or alteration of any existing facilties or cause a decine in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticpated. e) The proposed protect will util¢e existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not regwre the consWction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities ar cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identrfied the cumulative impact on library services as a sigmficent unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overnding Considerabons was ultimately adopted by the City CounGl The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14 RECREATION Would the protect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational faalities such that substantial physical detenoration of the faaliry would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the protect include recreational faalities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment • D--~ Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less mun s~pron®m Lde Issues and Supporting Information Scurces s Nn~m w ~u~, s~~ ~ r+o I d tea ~ ~ Comments: a) The site is In a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park (Golden Oak Park) is located less than 0 5 mile to the west of the protect site at 9345 Golden Oak Road This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an Increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilRies A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project. a) Cause an increase in Vaffic, which is substantial in O O O (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (I a ,result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle tnps, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at Intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level () () () (/) of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air Vaffic patterns, InGuding () () () (/) either an increase In traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (/) feature (e g ,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,fans equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result In inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g ,bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments' a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load In the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated. The protect is In an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or Included in protect design The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or wngestion at Intersections The protect site well be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the Clty has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate Vaffic circulation No impacts are anticipated W ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 23 ~~ Sipriflmtl Lea Issues and Supporting Infonnatlon Sources ~°'°'"~Y SlprYflmnl I wtln Afltl~tlon I '~ $IQ1fl(glli I ~ b) This Ilght Industrial protect will generate 132 two-way peak hour trips (non-retail, industrial) and, therefore, Is below the 250 two-way peak hour trips threshold of the San Bemardlno Congestion Management Plan (CMP) criteria for requiring a traffic Impact analysis The protect is In an area that is mostly developed with all sfreet Improvements existing. The protect will not negatively Impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The protect will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No Impacts are anticipated c) Located approximatety 1 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No Impacts are antlcipated. d) The protect is in an area that Is mostly developed. The protect will be required to provide street Improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The protect design does not Include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial Increase In hazards due to a design feature. No impacts are anticipated e) The design of the protect provides two driveways for emergency vehicle access on to the site and will, therefore, have adequate emergency access No Impacts are anticipated f) The protect design includes 237 parking stalls which is In excess of the 228 required parking stalls, and will comply with the standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an Inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting fransportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ). 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the () () () (/) protect a) Exceed wastewater Vestment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control BoardT b) Require or result in the construction of new water () () () (/) or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing faculties, the wnstruction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result In the construction of new storm () () (/) ( ) water drainage faculties or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve () () () (/) the protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? i p -4{0 ~1 L..J Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Las 71~an SIptlACent Las Issues and Supporting Information Sources ~nooi w ~no~ s~v e~m No i i yea i i a e) Result in a determination by the wastewater () () () (/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that d has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand m addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with suffiaent permitted () () () (/) capaary to accommodate the protest's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulabons related to solid waste Comments. a) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste Veated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RPM Veatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect ~s served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located wdhin City of Ontano, neither of which are at capaaty The protect is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality ConVol Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticpated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Budding Offiaal and Cary Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The protect is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a suffiaent water supply available to the Cary of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticpated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utdrties Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontano, neither of which are at capaary No impacts are anhapated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current Cdy contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with suffiaent capacity to handle the Cdy's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent wdh AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated p -~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 Page 25 ~~~ SlpMflt>aM Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources P°'°n~°Y SlprYfionl `"" Ftltl~atlm '~ SIgNfl®nl No I I le0 I I d 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (/) a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects)? c) Dces the protect have environmental effects that () () () (/) will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments• a) The site is not located in an area of sensitnre biological resources as identfed on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certficetion of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build- out in the City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in sign~cent adverse effects to aggregate resources, pnme farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less than significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the signficent unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts p-~~" Initial Study for SUBTPM16445 and DRC2003-01185 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction actnrdies were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tienng, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects ident~ed above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning DNision offices, 10500 Civic Center Dnve (check all that apply) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Industnal Area Speck Plan EIR (Cert~ed September 19, 1981) (T) Water Quality Management Plan (Damon Engineenng, March 30, 2004) (T) Drainage Report (Damon Engineenng, Apnl 5, 2004) (T) Arborist Report (Steven F Andresen Arbonst Services, July 20, 2004) ~~Q Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 SUBTPMi 6445 and DRC2003-01185 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certrfy that 1 am the applicant for the protect described in this Indial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/n rah ree clean nto s~ mficant environmental effectsrwould aoccurthe effects or mitigate the effects to a po Y 9 Applicant's Signature:%'~~`~~ Date: y-~B. oS Print Name and TRIe: /'~~ ~~~~ ~~'~'c~ r ~ f•~ ~ --5 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaratron is being circulated for public review rn accordance with the California Enwronmenfal Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Publrc Resources Code. Prolect File No.: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445 Public Review Period Closes: May 25, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant: Mark Capellino Prolect Location (also see attached map): 9850 6th Street - APN 0209-211-19 Project Description: A request to subdivide a 7 27 acre parcel into 10 parcels, with Parcel 2 for Condominwm purposes, in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) Related Files Development Revew DRC2003-01185 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804 FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the fallowing fmdmg• ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included m the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Mav 25 2005 Date of Determination Adopted By ~ 5a~ • RESOLUTION NO. 05-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 7.27 ACRE PARCEL INTO 10 PARCELS, WITH PARCEL 2 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 5), LOCATED AT 9850 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-211-19 A. Recitals 1. Mark Capellino, on behalf of Cap Brothers Construction, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM16445, as described in the Idle of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as 'Yhe application." 2. On the 23rd day of March 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application Because of a revision to the application that was requested by the applicant, the hearing was continued to April 27, 2005 to allow him to resubmit revised plans for staff review, and to allow the Environmental Assessment to be re- circulated. 3 On the 27th day of April 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga continued the item to May 25, 2005 because the applicant did not submit the plans to the City in time for staff to conduct a thorough review 4. On the 25th day of May, 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public heanng on the application and concluded said heanng on that date 5 All legal prerequisites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng on May 25, 2005, inGuding wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specificaly finds as follows a. The application applies to vacant property in the General Industrial (GI) District, (Subarea 5), located on the north side of 6th Street, about 950 feet east of Archibald Avenue; b The application proposes the subdivision of one parcel of 316,859 square feet (7.27 acres) into 10 parcels ranging in size between 16,255 square feet (Parcels 4 and 6) and 51,996 square feet (Parcel 1); and p -S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-38 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 . Page 2 c The subbed property has a street frontage along 6th Street of 370 feet with an overall width of 665 41 feet and an overall depth of 61586 feet, and d. The properties to the south, east, and west are fully improved with industriaUoffice development, and the properties to the north are partially developed wdh industrial development (the remainder are vacant), and e The properties to the north, south, and east are zoned General Industrial (GI) District, (Subarea 5), and the properties to the west are zoned General Industhal (GI) Distnd, Subarea 4; and f The application is in contundion with the development of 11 industnal buildings (DRC2003-01185), with a combined floor area of 126,843 square feet, and g The subdivision, together wrath the recommended conditions of approval, meets development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public heanng and upon the specific findings of fads set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a. The Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, . and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed, and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The Tentative Parcel Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map well not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision 4 Based upon the fads and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Ad (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Inkial Study prepared • therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the application. p-,~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-38 SUBTPM16445 - MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 Page 3 b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain sigmficant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the prolect, which are listed below as conditions of approval c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Irntial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the prolect, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the mforrnation provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth rn Section 753 5(F1-d) of Title 14 of the Calrfomia Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planrnna Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of one parcel into 10 parcels with Parcel 2 for Condommwm purposes 2) Shared access, parking, and maintenance shall be incorporated m the project Covenants, Conditions, and Restnctions (CCBRs) 3) Tree Removal Permit DRC2004-00804 is hereby approved ~nnth the condition that preservation of the Washingtoma robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified m the arbonst report as Trees #1 and #2, respectively, are relocated to suitable locations on-site The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval 4) Prior to establishing individual condominium units on Parcel 2 of this parcel map, the applicant or future property owner shall submit an application to subdivide the parcel for condominium purposes; this application is subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 1) Full frontage improvements shall be installed at the local mdustnal width (curb face 22 feet from the centerline of the street, m-line with the existing curb face on Parcel 1, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15948) mGuding asphak pavement to the centerline of the street, curb and gutter, dnve approach, curvilinear sidewalk, street trees, three 9500 Lumen HPSV streetlights, and traffic signing and stnpmg a) Curvilinear sidewalk and street trees shall be installed to accommodate the ultimate mndth of 6th Street (curb face 32 feet measured from the centerline) b) Dnve approach is to be constructed per City Standard No 101, Type C, and be a minimum of 35 feet wide Curvilinear sidewalk shall cross the dnve approach at the 0-inch curb face (non-contiguous sidewalk) .D S3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-38 SUBTPM1fi445 - MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 . Page 3 b. Although the Mitigated Negative Decaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the probed is approved, all significant effects hav een reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, whi re listed below as conditions of approval. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the lifomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows• In considenng there b as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is o evidence that the proposed probed wall have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife res roes orthe habdat upon which the Hnldlife depends Further, based upon the substantial eviden contaitred in the Mtigated Negative pedarat~on, the staff reports and exhibits, and the infonna ' n provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission h by rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of th California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and contusions set fo in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to ach and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and into orated herein by this reference Planning Deaartment 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a parcel into 10 parcels with Parcel 2 for Condominium purposes. • 2) Shared access, panting, an aintenance shall be incorporated in the probed Covenants, Condrt ns, and Restrictions (CCBRs). 3) Tree Removal Permit RC2004-00804 is hereby approved with the condition that preserv tion of the Washingtonia robusta (Mewcan Fan Palm) and the Plata us acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified in the arbonst report as rees #1 and #2, respectively, are relocated to suitable location onsde The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the ndscape Plans submitted to the Gty for review and approval. 1) Full fro age improvements shall be installed at the local industnal width rb face 22 feet from the centenine of the street, in-line with the ewsti g curb face on Parcel 1, Tentative Paroel Map SUBTPM75948) O Inca ding asphalt pavement to the centenine of the street, curb and /, gu er, dnve approach, curvilinear sidewalk, street trees, three 9500 L men HPSV streetlights, and traffic signing and stnping. P a) Curvilinear sidewalk and street trees shall be installed to n V accommodate the ultimate vndth of 6th Street (curb face 32 feet measured from the centenine). b) Dnve approach is to be constructed per City Standard No.101, Type C, and be a minimum of 35 feet vinde. Curvilinear sidewalk shall cross the dnve approach at the 0-inch curb face (noncontiguous sidewalk). p 53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-38 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 . Page 4 c) Main norfh/south dnveway shall align with the existing dnveway on the south side of 6th Street Centerline offset between the proposed dnveway and the existing dnveway across the street shall not exceed 10 feet. 2) Eventually, 6th Street v~nll be widened to a secondary artenal. While d may be impractical to install these improvements at this width now, development vinll be required to: a) Design on-sde improvements to accommodate the ultimate width of 6th Street (curb 32 feet from the centerline). Onent on-site improvements to work with both the intenm and ultimate street improvements. b) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to 1/2-foot behind the ultimate nght-of--way (44-feet measured from centerline of 6th Street and dedicated on Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15948) along the whole street frontage. 3) The existing ovefiead utilities (communications and electncal, except for the 66kV electrical) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 . of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15948, extending to the first pole off- site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopmeAt) as d occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement vnthin six months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all nghts of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 4) Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entenng the property from adjacent areas. Drainage from the north shall be collected and conveyed in PCC drainage devices, around proposed buildings to on-site facilities and eventually to discharge onto 6th Street 5) Public Improvement Plans shall be 90 percent complete pnor to the issuance of Grading Permits Public Improvement Plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, pnor to Building Permit issuance. 6) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the saUsfadion of the City Engineer pnor to issuance of Grading Permit, and identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the Grading Plan. Also, have appropnate WQMP 'TEMPLATE" Attachments regarding responsible person(s) for maintenance and operations of the BMPs recorded with the County of San Bernardino, and provide copy of p~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-38 SUBTPM16445 - MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 Page 5 recorded document to the Engineenng Department poor to issuance of Grading Permits ~ Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the project CC&Rs. 8) Where applicable, obtain and provde off-site entry rights to grade on adjacent properties including the railroad easement(s) 9) Provide wntten confirmation from the railroad company regarding any proposed grading adtacent to then easement along existing spur Imes, reference Grading Plan Submittal -Sections C, D, and E. 10) Decorative paving on-site shall not encroach onto the ultimate nght-of-way for 6th Stn:et. Environmental Mitigation Aesthetics 1) Light standards and fixtures shall be designed to ensure that illumination is confined v~nthin the protect site Glare shall be minim¢ed by shielding or diffusers or use of indirect lighting. A Photometric Plan shall be submitted for City Planner rewew and approval. Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condttion so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speufications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venficetion. 2) Priorto the issuance of any grading permds, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnd (SCAQMD) as well as Gty Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) Ail asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. • 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: p-S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-38 SUBTPM16445 -MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 • Page 6 Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of Ume Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboarcl ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB]) dairy to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. i7 Chemical sod stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. B) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industnal and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e , in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industnal and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. Q -~'~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-38 SUBTPM16445 - MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 Page 7 12) All industnal and commercial site tenants vwth 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industnal and commercial site tenants Nnth 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonaby feasible Biological Resounces 1) The applicant shall relocate the Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus acerfolia (London Plane Tree), identified as Trees #1 and #2, respectwely, on the Site Plan submitted Nnth the Arbonst Report, to suitable locations on-site. The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer Nall retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga vmli• Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification Nnthout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeologcal value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their spedal qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, folloNnng appropnate CEQA guidelines Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources Nnthin the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving . 2) A qualited paleontologist shall conduct apre-construction field survey of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monrtonng) that may be D-S~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-38 SUBTPM1ti445 -MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 Page 8 appropnate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must indude, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being Geared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens vinth a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMra emissions, in accordance vnth SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMro emissions assodated with vehide tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMro emissions from the site dunng such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMra emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Structures to retain precipitation and runoff on-site shall be integrated into the design of the project where appropnate. Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration indude Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and bndcs, terraces, diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pits, and recharge basins. 2) Prior to issuance of building pennks, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), inducting a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-sde to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. D-~ 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION IVO 05-38 SUBTPM16445 - MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 Page 9 3) Pnorto issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall submkto the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply Huth obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storrn Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Constructon Pemtft. 4) Loading docks must be kept m a clean and orderly conddion through a regular program of sweeping and litter control and immediate Geanup of spills and broken containers. 5) Below grade loading docks forwarehouse/distribution centers of fresh food items shall drain through water quality inlets, or to an engineered system, or an equally effective alternative. 6) Budding and grounds maintenance inGudes care of landscaped areas around the facility, cleaning of parking lots and pavement, and the cleaning of the storm drainage system. ~ Outdoor storage of items primany used by the tenant shall be discouraged In the event that outdoor storage cannot be avoided, the d f or matenals shall be kept in areas onginally designed and designate storage. 8) Outdoor storage of matenals for rehabilitation, remodeling, and improvements shall be placed in designated areas at the time the work is to be done. An area of the site shall be selected, away from drainage structures, and on a paved surface. The areas shall be isolated by use of erosion control measures, such as sandbags, plastc sheeting, and the creation of drainage dikes to collect any runoff from the area Smaller materials, such as drums, paints, chemicals, and tools shall be kept in a covered area. Larger matenals such as lumber shall be raised above the ground and securely covered with heavy plastic sheeting that Hell be resistant to tear in the event of heavy Hnnds. g) Trash containers shall be covered at all times. The exterior of the containers and the area surrounding the containers shall be kept clean of debns. Inspection shall be on weekly basis by the person responsible for the maintenance of the site Spills shall be cleaned immediately and shall be done v~nth the appropnate cleaning matenals. All drainage from the budding and pavement shall be diverted away from the trash container area. Budding roof drains shall be connected to the underground storm drain system or adtoining pavement drains located away from the trash container area. Trash container areas shall be screened or walled to prevent off-site transportation of trash. D ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-38 SUBTPM16445 - MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 Page 10 Noise 1) Construction or greding shall not take place between the hours of B.00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, inGuding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitonng at other times may be required by the Budding OffiGal. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building OffiGal v~nthin 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall ~mmed~ately notify the Budding OffiGal. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m. and 6:30 a m on weekdays, inGuding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass senskive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich MaGas, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2005, by the follownng vote-to-wk: p"(O~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-38 SUBTPM16445 - MARK CAPELLINO May 25, 2005 • Page 11 AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r 1 LJ p-~ ~ City of Rancho Cucamonga • MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project Flle No.: DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPMi6445 - MARK CAPELLINO This Mtigation Monioring Progrem (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact m~igation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2. A procedure of compliance and venficatton has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforoement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reportng programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially signrficant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Mondonng Checklist, attached hereto.- This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the onginal authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: Clty of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive . Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ~--~a Mitigation Monitoring Program • DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists wdl be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to momtor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Fonn. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form wdl be completed by the prolect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors 'it compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written nofrfication has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurdng. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project oompletlon shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-tens project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the morntonng results to the Crty. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qual~ed to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monRoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. ~J p-l~3 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2003-01185 and SUBTPM16445 Applicant: Cao Brothers Construction Initial Studv Preaared by MIKE SMITH Date: Mav 12.2005 ' ' .. .- .. ., . •. Aesthetics`'~ ~ '~~ -- ~~'- -- -. . fi . „M - ~,~ ~ ~ .. + ~ . Light standards and fixtures shall be designed to ensure `f" _ <_ f~ ~ , ~: '~'~"Y"~ ""' that illumination is confined within the protect sde Glare CP shall be minimized by shielding, diffusers, or use of B Review of plans A/C yq indirect lighting A Photometnc Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval Air Quality ~ ~;~~ • .;~ ,~~^*. - Y All construction egw ment h ll b Y fr 4~ ~~~} YrtY~ p s a e maintained in good CP C R f operating condition so as to reduce operational eview o plans A/C yq emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction egwpment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specfications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to fhe issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment wdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any consWction measures imposed by the South Coast Av Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray s ' °~ s '~'n vl s s ... .... .. . . .:. ... All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B . noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108 Rewew of plans AIC 2 Ali construction egwpment shall l comp y with SCAQMD BO C R f Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall eview o plans A/C y4 include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on th e construction site BO C R through seeding and watering eview of plans A/C v4 • Pave or apply gravel to an o t h y n-si e aul roads. BO C • Phase grading to prevent th BO Rewew of plans A/C 2~q e susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time C Rewew of plans A/C y4 • Schedule activities to minim th BO ize e amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of C Review of plans A/C 2~4 work penods • Dispose of sur lus BO p excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound C Rewew of plans A 4 engineering practices • Sweep streets accord t ing o a schedule established BO C D by the City if silt is tamed over to adtacent public uring A 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling construction Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i.e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance Nnth construction SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilivng agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RW OCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance Huth SCAQMD Rule 403 2of9 . , hemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and .. BO ~~ ... _ . . . RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction C During q 4 areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize ele t i B~ c r c or clean alte t f C R rna ive uel-powered equipment where feasible. eview of plans AIC q The construction contractor shall Bt) ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that C Review of plans A/C 2~4 work crews will shut off equpment when not in use All industrial and commeraal facilities shall post signs re BO C R quinng that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged eview of plans A 4 penods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) All industnal and commercial facilities sh ll d a esignate CP C preferential parking for vanpools Review of plans A/C pig All industrial and commercial site t t enan s with 50 or CP C R more employees shall be required to post both bus and eview of plans D y3 I Metrohnk schedules in conspicuous areas All industnal and commeraal s t t i e enants with 50 or CP C R more employees shall be requred to configure their eview of plans D v3 operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible Biological ' ~,,x=. " :: ~„- ~s ~, , ~ ~.~', y`' ^~= w-;s~ r e V i1 ~ 4~i y T=: - ln. J"'ti £>-~ •• 3~ ~~ y M ~ ~ .'1~'. ry~ ~(>°y :;`~.. ~ a .sST The applicant shall reloc t th W Y~ ~ L y Nt .eivl ~~~ a ~J ~Y~w~~J~' _ a e e ashingtonia robusta CP D R (Mexican Fan Palm) and the Platanus aaarfolia (Londo eview of plans A/D p/3 n Plane Tree), identn'ted as Trees #1 and #2, respectively, on the Site Plan submitted wdh the Arbonst Report, to suitable locations on-site The new locations of these trees shall be shown on the Landscape Plans submitted to the City for review and approval 3 0~ .. . . . . ... .. . Cultural Resources ~ ~`~'~~''`~ ";r,~, t "'~`? .. .. . ._ _ . ~,~ ~~~,- , If any prehistoric archaeological resources are enwuntered before or during grading, the developer wdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measure t CP/BO s o protect undesignated t C Review of report A!D 3/4 si es from demolition or significant moddicahon without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establish CP/B ing provisions to requve O C Review of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sties within new developments, using their speaal qualities as a theme or focal point t • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse pro/ect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources wthin the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report, wrath original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 6 4of9 I C~1 .. . . ., - Aqualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B ~ field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Review of report A~ 4 submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitonng) that may be appropriate. W here mitigation momtonng is appropriate , the program must inGude, but not be limited to the , following measures • Assign a paleontological monit t CP or, rained and equipped to allow the rapid removal f f B Review of report P/D 4 o ossils tenth minimal construction delay, to the sde full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbin a t ti g c ivi es • Should fossils be found within an b BO area eing Geared B/C P/D or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities Review of report 4 elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit a summa re ort t th CP ry p o e City of Rancho D R D Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a eview of report 3 copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. ~Geology`aridSoils }f`... ,r ,~:=fi,,~~~`~,,3`~;~~ '~_~+.~~ ~ ,'"``~"~ ~ : ~ ~ - ~ ~{Y~+-f~c"~-., _ ^ "gym,,, ,. , ~ - .. .. .Ld iT.$:..L The site shall be treated with water or other sod- ~iT3+": BO/CE ~ C ~ dR4 ~ v .t t~ b y stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) During A 4 daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance wdh construction SCAQMD Rule 403 Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a CE C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o construction emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BOICE C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction from the site dunng such episodes 5 0~ f~ I .. , - . - .. . .. ... ~, . Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and . . . . BO .. . . ... , RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction C During q 4 areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more t construction o reduce PM~o emissions Hydrdlogyan&~VVater:Quahty ~'~,~+"~~~`,'~".~~`,~~ ' Structures to retain preapdation and runoff on t h ~` '""h" -si e s all be integrated into the desi n of the 9 project where CE B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/q appropriate Measures that may be used to minimize runoff and to enhance infiltration include Dutch drains, precast concrete lattice blocks and backs, terraces , diversions, runoff spreaders, seepage pils and rechar , ge basins Prior to issuance of bwldin g permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Review of plans AIC y4 Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The W QMP shall identity the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Cdy of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applipnt CE B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit 6of9 .. .~ .. ... .. Loading docks must be kept in a clean and orderly CP -. E .. , condition through a regular program of sweeping and As needed C ~ litter control and immediate cleanup of spills and broken containers Below grade loading docks for wareho /d use istribution centers of fresh food items shall drain through water CE g Revew of plans A/C 2/q quality inlets, or to an engineered system, or an equally effective alternative Bwlding and grounds maintenanc l d e inc u es care of CP E q landscaped areas around the faality, clearing of parking s needed q ~ lots and pavement, and the cleaning of the stone drainage system Outdoor storage of items rimaril d b p y use y the tenant CP/BO B/E R f shall be discouraged In the event that outdoor storage eview o plans AIC 2/q/7 © cannot be avoided, the materials shall be kept in areas I originally designed and designated for storage Outdoor stora e of t l O g ma eria s for rehabddation, remodeling and im r t CP/BO B/E During AIC 2/q/7 , p ovemen s shall be placed in designated areas at the time the work is to be done An construction area of the site shall be selected, away from drainage structures, and on a paved surtace The areas shall be isolated by use of erosion control measures, such as sandbags, plastic sheeting, and the creation of drainage dikes to collect any runoff from the area Smaller materials, such as drums, paints, chemicals, and tools shall be kept in a covered area Larger materials such as lumber shall be raised above the ground and securely covered wdh heavy plastic sheeting that well be resistant to tear in the event of heavy winds 7 0~ ' ,. .. .. ... .. Trash containers shall be covered at all times The CP exterior of the containers and the area surrounding the g/E Review of plans A/C 7 containers shall be kept clean of debris Inspection shall be on weekly basis by the person responsible for the maintenance of the site. Spills shall be cleaned immediately and shall be done with the appropriate cleaning materials All drainage from the bwlding and pavement shall be diverted away from the trash container area Budding roof drains shall be connected to the underground storm drain system or adjoining pavement drains located away from the trash container area Trash container areas shall be screened orwalled to prevent off-site transportation of trash Noise ~ -'°• r ` ~ -_. ;-~~ ° ~°~~ Q ' Construction or grading shall not take place betwe th ~. 8 ;;~ '~~. ;~~ ~~; .a,.~„,, a ~ "` ' ~~ "' ~ ° ' ~ en e hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays 0 C During A 4 , including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a construction - national holiday. Construction or gradin noise le l h ll g ve s s a not exceed the BO C standards specified in Development Code Section During q 4 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The construction developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as specked in Development Code Section 17.02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report then findings to the Budding Offiaal wAhm 24 hours, however, rf noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notdy the Budding Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction 8of9 Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, tf heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting bath to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings C During construction G Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person ~' , ; CDD - Commurnty C CP -City Planner or CF _ re„ F.,,,~.,ee.,. u or Or C A- B- On New -Fire Chief or B- C- D- Submittal A an 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwlding Permd 3 -Withhold CerLficate of Occupancy 4 -Stop Work Order 5 -Retain Deposd or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 9 O~ • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16445 SUBJECT: SUBDIVIDE A 7.27 ACRE PARCEL INTO 11 PARCELS APPLICANT: MARK CAPELLINO (CAP BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION) LOCATION: 9850 6TH STREET; APN• 0209-211-19 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: .A. General Requirements 1 The applicent shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the altematrve, to relingwsh such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe regwred by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at ds sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such acbon but such partiapation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this conddion 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-38, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be induded on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading admties and are not regwred to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer wdhin 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance Nnth the approved plans which indude site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations. ~C-11-04 Comoletlort Dale /_ _/ / /_ _/ p-~3 Protect No SUBTPM16445 Comolehon Date 2 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Condttons _/_/~ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner 3 Occupancy of the faalities shall not commence until such time as all Undorm Budding Code and / / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The bwldtngs shall be inspected for compliance pnor to occupancy 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, budding, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdtwston, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / / other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permd issuance. 7 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/ /_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the Cdy Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Cdy Planner and City Engineer review and approved pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits D. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, inGudtng slope planting and model home landscaping In / /~ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Cdy Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permts or pnor final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2. The final design of perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be inGuded in the required landscape plans and shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be regwred by the Engineering Department E. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the pro/ect The applicant is responsible for the cost of /_/ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be regwred to post cash, letter of credd, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner to the amount of $ 474 pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mtigaton measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions regwred by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. F. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location /_/ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes wdh adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be sub/ect to City Planner review and approval pnor to the issuance of bwldmg permits • 2 ~ _~ l RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD CONDITIONS October 7, 2004 6th Industrial Project 6th St between Archibald Avenue and Hemtosa Avenue (12) Parcel Protect DRC2003-01185 8 SUBTPM16445 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design gwdelmes for Fire Hydrants The following provides design gwdelmes for the spaGng and location of fire hydrants. a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial protects is 300-feet • No portion of the extenor wall shall be located more than 150.feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercal, ndustnal or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iu. On the nght side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distnct. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. If any portion of a faality or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional pnvate or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. , d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow i 1 The required minimum fire flow for this protect, when automatic fire spnnklers are installed is 2,125 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reductron for the installatwn of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in p= l~ accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This regwrement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances . Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed pro/ect may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adiacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are requred for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire spnnkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire spnnkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnd Ordinance 15, the 2001 Califomia Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire spnnkler system to be installed in. Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 All structures that do not meet Fire District access requrements (see Fire Access). 3. When the budding access does not meet the requirements of the 2001 Califomia Budding Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard #9-7 4 When any applicable code or standard regwres the structure to be spnnklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System The Califomia Budding Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the Caf~fomia Fire Code regwre a listed fire spnnkler morntonng Central Station Fire Alarm system. Plan check approval and a budding permit are required Prior to the installation of the fire alarm system. Plans and spermcations shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance ~nnth RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Std #9-7. Location of Access• All portions of the structures 1~` story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the budding. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2 D ~~ 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b. The maximum inside tum radws shall be 24-feet. The minimum outside tum radws shall be 50-feet d. The minimum radws for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) ~ Trees and shrubs planted ad/scent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways. Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided m accordance with the 2001 California Budding Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards b. In bwldmgs with high-pled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or maior fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the regwred access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all regwred openings. 4. Access Walkways• Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be m accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2. The following design requirements apply. a. The gate shall slide open horizontally or swing inward. All gates must open at the rate of one second for each one-foot of regwred width. c. When fully open, the mirnmum width shall be 20-feet. d. Gates are not required to be motorized Motorized gates must have a manual over ride or battery back up. i 3 D ~~ Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minmum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application # 05822 8 # 05842 must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to 68S for plan review. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly assoaated with the business operations and/or bwlding construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is regwred prior to pennit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the tudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Aerosol Products • Application of Flammable Finishes • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Cellulose Nitrate • Compressed Gases • Cryogenics • Dry Cleaning Plants • Dust-ProduGng Processes and Operations • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Flammable and Combustible Ligwds • Fruit Ripening Plants • Hazardous Materials • High-Pile Combustible Storage (HPS) • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings Magneswm Working Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation Open Buming Organic Coating Ovens Powder Coating Public Assembly Pyrotechnical Speaal Effects Radioactive Materials Refrigeration Systems Repair Garages Rubbish Handling Operations Spraying or Dipping Operations Tents, Canopies arxt/or AR Supported Structures Tire Storage Welding and Cutting Operations Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bemardmo County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bemardmo County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Budding & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specrfic hazardous materials disclosure regwrements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be regwred rf regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new faality 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased orooertv which rs regwred to submit a Plan, is also . required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subiect to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the 4 ~~8 provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal has review and approved (2) applications for Alternate Methods. Per Alt. Method # 5822 Buildings 10 8 11 must be constructed with a sprinkler system capable of protecting a high hazard classification commodity stored in racks up to 20'. Per Alt. Method # 5842 Buildings 2, 4, 6, tii 8 sprinklers systems may be supplied from the hydrant loop. FCS-14 Map Recordation Reciprocal Access Agreement The plan as submitted indicate that the required Fire Department access: a. Crosses a property line b. Is shared by multiple owners, and c. Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoGation Please provide a permanent access agreement granting irrevocable use of the property to the Fire District. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, budding or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access without Fire District approval. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan The agreement shall be presented to Fire Construction Services for review and approval, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder's Office, County of San Bernardino. To assist Fire Construction Services in reviewing the agreement the following shall be included in the submittal. a. The current title reports to provide a legal description and proof of ownership for all properties included in the agreement. b. The assessor's parcel numbers of each parcel subiect to the agreement. c. A scaled site plan showing the path of the Fire District access, the width, turn radu and slope of roadway surface shall be provided The access roadway shall comply with the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. 2. Reciprocal Water Covenant and Agreement. The plans as submitted indicate that a required private fire mains or appurtenances a. Crosses a property line. 5 D ~~ b Is located on common space under the control of an owner's assoaation, and Is shared by multiple owners Please provide a permanent maintenance and service agreement between the owner for the pnvate water mains, fire hydrants and fire protection egwpment essential to the water supply. The agreement shall meet the form and content approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distnct The agreement shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services for rewew and approval, pnor to recordation The agreement shall be recorded within the Recorder's Office, County of San Bemardino Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the pnvate water main system for rewew and approval by the Fire Distnct. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire Distnd Standards Approval of the on-site (pnvate) fire underground and water plans is regwred pnor to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Prvate on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Diwsion and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All pnvate on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable pnor to delrvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site. Fire construction Services vnll inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems• The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radds of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All regwred public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delrvenng any combustible framing matenals to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3 Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the regwrements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least t4' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bemardino 6 D ~~ PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER • The budding construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers. All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2 Private Fire Hydrants• For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services ventying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the Cal~fomia Fire Code 3. Fire Sprinkler System• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Sernces. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or egwpment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System. Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7. Access Control Gates• Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 8 Fire Access Roadways: Pnor to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reaprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all requred fire access roadways. 9 Address: Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commeraal~ndustnal and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the budding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be regwred on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial _O and industrial buildings. The swte designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and bads of all swtes • 10 Hazardous Materials: Prior to the issuance of a Cert~cate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and Enforcement Division. The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information• The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire Distract use in the event of an emergency at the subiect budding or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12 Mapping Site Plan• Prior to the issuance of a Cert~cate of Occupancy, a 8 %z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as regwred in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector ~ ~a Rancho Cucamonga StaffReport DATE: May 25, 2005 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-00106 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to change the land use designation from General Commercial to Park for 3 36 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Dnve and to change the land use designation from General Industnal (Subarea 1) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 5.54 acres of land, located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue -APN: 0207-262-18 (portion of) and 27. Related files: Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00107, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and Development Review DRC2005-00220. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to change the zoning designation from General Commercal to Park for 3.36 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Dnve and to change the land use designation from General Indtstnal (Subarea 1) to Medum Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 5.54 acres of land, located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue -APN: 0207-262-18 (portion of) and 27. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and Development Review DRC2005-00220. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to subdivide 12.8 gross acres of land into three parcels within the General Commercial and General Industnal (Subarea 1) Districts, located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Madrone Avenue -APN: 0207-262-18 and 27. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00107, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455, and Development Review DRC2005-00220. Items "E, F, G" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-0O106JDRC2005-00107/SUBTPM17156 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS May 25, 2005 Page 2 SUMMARY: Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners is requesting Planning Commission's recommendation of approval for their proposal to amend the current land use designations of a 11.7 acre site located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Madrone Avenue, more commonly identified as the location of the original Cask-N-Cleaver restaurant. The requested changes would amend the existing Industrial and General Commeraal land use designations to Medium Residential, Park Overlay, and a smaller Commeraal designated site for the Cask-N- Cleaver restaurant and corporate offices The proposal also includes a request for approval of a tentative parcel map to create separate sites for the future development of new condominwms, a public park, and the existing restaurant. Staff finds the proposed changes in the land use designations and assoaated parcel map for the subject site to be appropriate. The proposed land use changes wdl be an effective means for implementing the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that they wdl encourage orderly development of the site that is generally consistent and compatible with development surrounding the site. BACKGROUND: The following is a summary description of the current land use designations and uses on the subject site: Current Land Use Designations/Develooment The subject site is 11.7 net acres in total, created by two existing parcels as described in the following table: Exisfing Lot/APN ot Area Existing General Plan Designation Exisfing Zoning Designation xisting Use(s) 8689 9th Street and 8651 Madrone Avenue 0207-262-018 9.31 acres General General • Original Cask-N-Cleaver restaurant Commeraal Commeraal complex (including restaurant, (GC) (GC) storage, 2-story corporate office building, a~binet shop, and parking) • Six small residential cottages 8714 9th Street 0207-262-027 2.40 acres General General • Two residential structures used Industrial Industrial as offices for a company that (GI) (GI) arranges transportation and storage of trucks and airs c,F,~a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00106~DRC2005.00107/SUBTPM17156 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS May 25, 2005 Page 3 Proposed Project: To accommodate the anticipated development of the site, including new residential development and a future public park, the applicant is requesting that the current land use designations and arrangement of the site be amended as summarized in the following table: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156 and Proposed Changes to Land Use Designations Proposed General Proposed Zoning Proposed Future New Lof Lot Area Plan Designation Designation Uses Lot 1 554 acres Medium Residential Medium Residential 64 Condominwms (8-14 DUs /Acre) (8-14 DUs/Acre) Lot 2 3 36 acres Park Overlay Park Public Park' Lot 3 2.80 acres General Commercial General Commercal Restaurant " • Upon approval of the change in the General Plan and Zoning land use designations, the 3 4 acre park site will be purchased by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. '• Cask-N-Cleaver restaurant remains in operation for foreseeable future. ANALYSIS: Staff finds the proposed changes in the land use designations and associated parcel map for the subject site to be appropriate. The basis for staff's recommendation includes the following Amendment of Land Use Designations The proposed land use changes will more effectively implement the goals and obtectives of the General Plan, in that they will encourage orderly development of the site that is generally consistent and compatible with development surrounding the site. The requested land use changes and associated parcel map enable the applicant to make more effiaent use of land by replacing partially undeveloped land and non-conforming industrial uses with new residential development and open space for a public park. The land use changes will result in fewer land use conflicts between commercal/industrial uses and surrounding residential development The proposal will eliminate an existing unsightly and non-conforming industrial use from the north side of 9th Street where the area is largely developed with residential uses Moreover, 9th Street serves as a logical dividing line between residential uses on the north and future °light industnal° uses anticpated for the south side of street. • The proposed Medum Residential (8-14 DUs/Acre) land use designation for the largest parcel will be consistent with the density levels of residential development on nearby parcels on the north side of 9th Street. Apartments exist to the north, and townhome and , single-family development exist on the west side of Madrone Avenue. Thus, the proposal will result a land use pattern that is consistent with the existing land use designations and development pattern of the area. >~~-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-0010fJDRC2005.00107/SUBTPM17156 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS May 25, 2005 Page 4 The reservation of land area for the future development and use as a public park wdl address the need for more park space in this area of the community as identified in the General Plan. When the park is completed, it will further improve and strengthen the existing residential neighborhood on the north side of 9th Street. The smaller sized lot containing the Cask-N-Cleaver restaurant wtll be of suffiaent size to accommodate the existing restaurant use. The proposed land use amendments and subsequent development of the protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. Parcel Maa The parcel map assoaated with this protect is appropriate in that the proposed parcels are of suffiaent size to meet minimum Code requirements to accommodate anticipated future development. New street improvements associated with the approval of the parcel map wdl enhance the appearance of the 9th Street streetscape and improve pedestrian access/movement inthe area. The proposed land use changes and subsequent development of the site wdl not pose an undue burden to existing improvements and infrastructure within the area. The necessary utilities exist in the area and will be upgraded as needed to accommodate future development of the subject site. The proposed land use amendments and subsequent development of the overall site area will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially iniunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed residential and park uses will be consistent with the pattern of development in the area and strengthen the fabric of the neighborhood. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT An Initial Study analyzing the potential impacts of the protect was prepared and released for pubic comment on April 25, 2005 The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. The impacts resulting from air quality would be short-terrn and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Irntial Study also identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. In response to these potential impacts, mitigation measures are proposed to ensure impacts remain at less-than-significant levels. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the protect NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: Two neighborhood meetings to discuss the proposed protect in May 2004 and in May 2005 (6 residents attended). At both meetings, the residents were generally supportive of the protect. During the second meeting, one resident Irving in the townhomes on the west side of Ninth Street voiced her concern about parking on her street by new residents from the future condominwms on Ninth Street. Written summaries of the meetings will be provided to the commission at the meeting. Staff has also received two phone ~/ 1~ ~ ~ 7' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-0010G/DRC2005.00107/SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS May 25, 2005 Page 5 calls from the public regarding the protect. Both were in support of the protect. One caller voiced their support for not allowing any more industrial uses on the north side of Ninth Street. PUBLIC NOTICE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dady Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were marled to all property owners within 600-foot radws of the protect site to properties to the north, south, east, and west. A total of 178 notices were mailed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156 by adoption of the Resolution of Approval. Furthermore, staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolutions recommending that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106 and Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00107. The Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156 is contingent upon the approval of the General Plan and Development Distract Amendments. Respectf submitted, .ire Brad Buller City Planner BB:MPD/ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Site Plan Exhibit B -Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit C -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00107 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156 ~~ F, G-~ ~~~~ ,_ • ~ U,~ V~ ~ • TRACT HO 9658 lol M .1465u'S /ML YY HL 1pt M aYIICR9IA1:6 YM K TRACT NO 12621 w i a~Ynr,llm YVq w K atnaat raw 11MM ~~ l~ I v _ a - 1-1) -YI- ,~ ,. +_ -, .n )_ 1 I 1 I PREPARED BY1 . .., ~~ .. ..v 141NN111 INlIN 1111,•1Y4Y11011 PREPARED FORT RArtceo CUCAMONCA Housmc PARTR6R3, L.P., u Cdiforeie Ilmlted partoenhip GO 71ie REUT80 ConrnAtvlxs Oe Cel.monxu 16201 Vou Kerman Avenue, Sulte 900 Irvine, CB 92612 Ph•(949)550-7272 Fez: (949) 660.727) e "~ ><G ~0 %+ ati tl4s .v ~~ Z~ ux vl Ymr-mr 1 Mx ow ux \ YIpI'pNM ~ \ .. 1 4Y 14 rY•vwr ~~ 1 •®u ~~ 1 e~ .,1 I a \ I sr ux 1 7 4n x 1 Cll ~• xy~• ` i ~~ m%'iuu ~` ._M .- GI A •rx I Iw xA am-w., ~~ Y..4 I I W rA xWr fa u1 K' }~ /f' 11 l'J ~, 14 'b6~ CT 14 YYYY wu .J - . _"`f - T ' `` •~~~•VIK mrroir 4x 11 ~ -. 1,~ ••• AY K ~~ 4 ~ 1 .~.~ I 0 LEGEND M • MEDAJM REB®ENTIAL (8-14 DU/AC) GC .GENERAL COMMERCIAL P • R•IDUSTRIAL PARK ~ • aEr~RAL wDUSTRIAL OB • OPEN SPACE 1 ~ 1 11 a loo zoo aoo ea I EXISTING LAND USE SITE PLAN DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NINTH AND MADRONE CfTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DA~•E PRED•MARCH~9~~005 n ~, ~ i ;~;~~ ll~~~pl°e9 hll°li nAlltl j 6e ; ~ 1 I i ~1 °I III j~, '~1 Ih~ Iii i~°fI1~Q 1 I! III r~i : I s t sl, t l ~ji~ d~ i °III"~ ! ~ ~~ ~ ~b Btl1e( ~I (•' jji °I iIlI4: .°I lf,. Iii°, ;1 ,~ ~,~i ,1,1 'if I;i~`'ll` a°III~.,~1~lil p0i.1 i°~' ~"1...I's!~ I' ~ Ij~ ° ~° t ! B .I•III ,~ I Bd° ~% 11 'il.: ~ ~i~Pliol~'o~°8~~~~[! ~~I ii~,sy II~,:Pi is,?I:yi"s;~l 0 ..e's.,6.b,~11~i~,~. ,,I,e Ott i..ll~lai°I°Illi~ 111,IIE11E~! ~, ~ ~ ~~,.. {~f~ at~ ~ -aa11a1 i111111~1 ~ I~,I~I rl~~ ~l 1~{,1 I~~ ~ ~; . ;~ , - -- -w ~ r i~~l ~ ~ ~ %~ i.F~~~`sl S ~ ~ \` ;jj ~ ~~~~ ~>f~-~ a_ . i.l,ll~ ~~~' ~$ i-E all ~ ''I ~I~ 1 1111 ~ 1 ,,°, Itl ~(I111. 6f~~~110 11 j I ~~If. a~l~Bsleasu1 I1~11 C.a~-- - :' ,, r _~ .y i11~~ \s ~ A A ~ . ~ ~, i~ ;~ f el'i I 1 P ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~Y t R ~- _- ~..-_ " i I .q k n, u it ' • j ,1 ~``~~`.. ~ ~ r, i .{{ -- _ _ Y ~ ~ ~, i ~ ' ,~ ~ r .., I a •\ •\ `~`~' 4f~1 ,,-:. Vii, i `t \ 1 ~ .s. yJ, L^~ ~_r d~ .~. ~.Il~~~~l it ~. ,~~', F ~ ___ \~ .r r= !_~ t .R ni ~ jai ~,~ '~+..5fir'k'~FS1'.$.s ~ Y' ,--. -- "_ >` ~ Ir L ~ S "~t^ I p -- r,~ 1 t,~ ~~^~il ~ t L t '~I it ^~A ~ . ~L~1 ~~ ~1 TE ~{~ F'( '~ ~ ~i't' ~~e~~~~ ~FG~ /, ~.-- ,~:~_ ~,~ ., ~, ~ , - G, ~ ~ ~`_ -.I d1 _ ,' ' t~ -1 _ ly _. _ ~m> ~,~__ . tip' 3~ ~ ! Q )~ .\th ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ` ra...•.. ~\ ~ / ,~ i 4 . \\ ~\ .ar'_ \ x. ~~z~~ ~1 ~#O~ ~~~~~~~ ~~Ja ~~a~U~ Z~~~ L Q 1~ LLLL O !.s 1~ '1 ' E~ ®RE ~' ~~°~ E~ E ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ N •1 M ~Plannl~p DeDe ran«n (90f1) 477-27lia The purpose oft -"project so that tF Guidelines; the Procedures ,to lr application be p Upon review of" additional inforn geologicalrepor unless the idenf complete grid ad review unless,a prepare ;ttieanitil applicanf,,will tie consultants ~~,for ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM ! (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using Ink Use the taD key ro move from one line ro the next IIneJ 'rs'to iriform the City of the basic components"of,the;propo'sed r- iy review'tFie,project pursuanttoCity Policies; Ordinances; arid' iia Environmental Quality Act; and the City's ~ Rules ',,arid ,-, t CEQA: ~It is important that the' information requested in~,tliis~,+ pleted~lnitial Study'Part I and-the development application; ch as, but not limited to, traffic, noise; biological; drainage; and s required. ,The project application will not be deemed complete - ;ial studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as 1'he;project application will not be'scheduled'for~Committees' ' id=reports -are 'submitted-and deemed complete,for_staff to ~` Part`,Ildas-required"by;CEl']A. In addition-to the'tfiling_fee,; the ible""to'~pay,or reimburse ,the City; its'agents;~,officers~ and/or" ~~~foi•;~tthe~,preparation;'~review; analysis, recommendation's, peciat~'studies or reports: 4 :. ~ - <~~..,r~.-., CJ ED Please note that d rs the responsrbrllty of the applicant to ensure that staN will not be evadable to perform work required to prowde missing mlormetron Application Numberforthe project to which this form pertains GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC 2005-00106 DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 2005-00107 Pro/ect Title Ninth and Madrone Name B Address olpro/ect ow~rer(s). Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners LP a California Limited Partnership 18201 Von Kerman Avenue, Suke 900, Irvine, CA 92612 (Johnson Family Trust and Stys Family Living Trust and John McDonald) Name&AddressoideveloperorproJedsponsor. Same n ~~ /~/O~B ~` Page 1 of 10 Rev (~' a ~AIQPfHGf1'&1BARTEPAn6F1NMGI.ErnKe/UDYOPA]A ....~.,..._ iii ~ G .,rroa C_J L J Contact Person & Address R Stan Smdh 18201 Von Korman Avenue, Suite 900 Irvine, CA 92612 Name & Address o/person prepanng this form (dddferent from above) Same In/ormabon indicated by an astensk () is not regwred of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. •7) Prowde a full scale (&12 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the pm~ed site, and indicate the sde boundanes p) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views /nto the site from the north, south, eas4 and s gmficent featuresdfrom the sdee include a map showing locahontof each photogrephnd representafrve wawa of 3) Protect Location (descnbe) Northeast comer of Ninth Street and Madrone Avenue q) Assessols Parcel Numbers (attach edd~honal sheet d necessary) APN 207-262-18 and 207-262-27 '5) Gross Sde Area (adsq R)• 12 80 acres '6) Net S/te Area (total sde srze minus area o/public streets B proposed 11 64 acres dedications) 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment orzone change which would affect the profed sde (attach add~honal sheet if necessary): GPA -from GC and GI to LM ZC -from GC and GI to LM l1TIC-0EVWROIECigyigE-0EVEL~OIE MID YiMCT'p~FpyBg plVp0lw01fK ~~'.~DOC 3/77/04 ~/ 7 / -(']f Page 2 of t0 Rev Telephone Number 949.660-7272 i I 8) Include a description of all pal its which wiAbe necessary from the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmenbil agencies rn order to fully implement the pro/ed Gradm Permit Encroachment Permit Buildin Permit g) Descnbe the physical sefbng of the site as il exists before the pro/act rnGudrng rn/ormabon on topography, sort stability, plants and animals, mature pees, Earls and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Descnbe any existrrig structures on sde (mcludmg age and condrbon) and the use o/the structures Attach photographs o/significant features described In add~hon, cite all sources ofrnformabon (~.e , geological and/orhydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic sbidles): The to o ra h of the site has a 20' dro in elevation from the NW comer to the SE comer. The soil is .. _.. ___„ _~..,.r reams .ems„~ ,nrliraro ae~roval for beanng loads proposed wdh standard sde as a Nona row the propel ._ on the are dilapidated and not up to m And offices were constructed sometime after earl 1955 Please see attached hotos site ma and ilia rams ublishedreports 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/orhistoncalaapects o/the site Cite all sources ofinformabon (books, p and oral history)' _ _ _ w s,uoro/w,amm Page 3 Of 10 Rev __ ~gaa~pnortuosn`arrsueNrreoum vM+or+~ ~ /T ~`~ s~muo~~~ U Desi nation There are no other observed cultural as cts to the site 11) l~scnbe any noise soun:es and theirlevels that~_wetiect the site (arroralt roadwaynase, eta) and howtheywill affect proposed uses r1 LJ r1 L~ No noise considerations 12) Describe the proposed pro/act in detail 7hls should prohde an adequate description o/the sde m temu of ultimate use that will result tram the proposed pro/ed. Indicate d there are proposed phases for developmenk the extern o/ development to occur with each phase, and the andcipated completion of each increment. Attach addrtlonal sheet(s) H necessary The protect will be constructed as 64 condos on 5 5 acres There will be 13 buildings with a recreatwN Amenities Sizes will range from 1382 to 1554 square feet The site will also contain large green belts with a tot lot and barbeque area Walkways and paseos well be located throughout the project At this time construction is slated to be one hase and commence in winter of 2005-2006. It is antic) ated the construction enod will be 12 months The architectural theme Is slanted towards a Mediterranean look with Inset windows file roofs and attached 2 car garages Unlike many condo Condo ro acts each unit will have a far a rivate rear b. Pnva was a main concern of the Develo r dunn the desi n hase of the ro act The second aroel of 2 8 acres vmll remain as the Site of the Cask n Cleaver restaurant The third parcel of 3 4 acres well be owned and controlled by the _ CI of Rancho Cucamonga At this point this parcel will be re-zoned as Open Space. The city of Rancho Cucamon a Redevelo merit A en will urohase 29 of the 64 units and in turn rent them to Families of Low to Moderate Income levels 13) Describe the surrounding properties, inducting information on plants and animals and any cuRural, hlstortcal, orscenic aspects Ind~cete the type o/land use (residential, commercial, eta), intensity of land use (one-/amity, aparbnent houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (he/gh~ homage, setbadr, rearYaN, etc.): North - Exisbn a artments East -Industrial /sin le famil homes South -Vacant West -Cask and Cleaver and bun slows r1 LJ 14) X11 the proposed protect change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project9 Yes The ro osed ro act will be develo d at a lower dens than the a artments to the north and at a Less intense land use than the underlying GC portion The underlying GI land use Is an entirety different The north and west The and to the existing GI on Space t0 the WBSt WIII be CAmpatlble Wlm Vie eX15[Ing re5~ueiiuai uaca w well prowde a suitable transition from the existing residential tb the west sm~cew~o+~s~~°NE wo armertr ne~mmm.~®~+w,ErnK mc~ av~ e.aemnx 3/17/04 ~~~ ~ ~/ page 4 of 10 Rev 15) Indicate the type ofshort-term and longderm noise to be generated, ~ncludmg source and amount How will these nose levels affect ad/acenf properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Construction noise - dunn construction enod Minor increases in traffic •18) Indicate proposed removals and/orreplacements of mature orscenic trees' Please review the attached Arbonst Re rt 17) Indicate any bodes of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the sde drains: of Pro 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanficahon, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct at 987-2591. a Residential (gal/day) ?r+t3 GPD/DU b. CommerwaUlnd. (gaUday/ac) Peak use (gal/Day) 16.384 GPD Peak use (gal/mir/ac) ~ Sepdc Tank ^ Sewer 19) Indicate proposed method o/sewage disposal 1/septic tanks are ProP°S~ attach percolahon tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed mdicate expected daily sewagegenerabon (SeeAttechmentAforusageeshmates) ForfuRherclanficabon,p/easeoontactthe Cucamonga Valley Water Dlstnct at 987-2591 a Res~denbal (gaUday) 12.160 GPD b. CommerciaUlndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residenba/ units 64 tached (mdicate range of Parcel srzes, minimum lot size end maximum lot size A ached (mdicate whetherunifs are n:ntal or for sale unds) For Sale Condominiums 1384 to 1552 s uare feet ~,~~ Page 5 of 10 Rev 6 ,~~~ ND YIIICf f Y BUB11nEC.4]B E~iFiGr! i •21) Anhapated range of sale pnces and/or rents: Sale Pnce(s) 3300.000 est To $335.000 est _ Rent (permonth) 3 to 3 22) Spedly number of bedrooms by unit type. All are three bedroom 23) Indicate anbgpated household she by and type: 3~q clad numberol school children who will be residing wrthm the pro/ect• Goofed the appropnate School 24) Indicate the expo ~ Aflachment B. D~stnds es shown a. Elementary: 8.3 6. Junior Hrgh: 3 4 c. SenlorHlgh 4.8 COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) t)asglbe type o/use(s) and ma)or/uncbon(s) o/crommerciel, industrial or instrtubonal uses 26) Total flpprarea o/commerolal, mdusbial, orinsbtubonal uses by type' 27) Indicate hours o/operation: 28) Number of employees: Total: Max/mum Shpt Time o/Max/mum Shift wo anrc+rr asmen+~~eie eNnarws~rK snior arM a.oe ~,,,,~ E F, G-l Page 6 of 10 Rev 2g) Prowde breakdown o/anbap I tad/o6 classrficahons, rndudmg wage and salary I nges, as well es an mdicahon ofthe rate d hue for each dassdicabon (attach addrbonal sheet r/necessary): 30) Eshmaflon of the number o/ workers to be hired that currently reside m the C8Y' ~1) verified through the ~ Coast Air Quality rManagemerd DiDi d et (818) 572 2a~~lubon emissions. (Date should be ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agendas sernng the pro/ed bean contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate servke fo th proposed Pro/ect7 H so, Please rnd~cate their response. Yes - all a en s res nses have been sthve 33) In the known history o/this pmpeAy, has there been any use, storage. or discharge olhazardous and/or toxic matedals? Examples ofhazartlous andrortoxrc matenals indude, but are not 6mded to PCB's; red~oachve substances; pestiddes and herblades; fuels, als, solvents, and otherflammable 6qu~ds and gases Also note urMergrourrd storage of any o/the above please Est the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, endror discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, fl known Please review the attached Phase 1 Environmental re ort re aced b ALTEC En ineenn . ~_~ ~~,~~~~ Paga7ol'10 Rev wn martr ais,.ncrMeea 3/,7104 EiFiG ~~ i '. I 34) Will the proposed pm%ct involve the temporary orlong-term use, srorage, ord~scharge ornazardous and~ortoxic matenals, rncludmg but not l~mrhrd to those examples listed above? if yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along Nnth the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the aPPlrcabon plans. I hereby carh/y that the statements /umrshed above and !n the attached exhibits present the data and /nlormation requued for adequate evaluation of this pro%ect to the best ofmy abdrty, that the facts, statements, and rnformabon presented are true and coned tot he best of my knowledge and belle/ I further understand that addrbonal inlormahon maybe required to be submdfed before an adequate evaluation can tie made by the City o/Rancho Cucamonga Date' .3 !~ OS Signature. ~~i T,~e: v~ c~ P~ ra~-r wovnrarr~er~eOeNiaa~+.e~+rKnuovoM~naromc Pege8of10 Rev 3!17!04 C r/ v ATTACHMENT"A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usac~Le. Single-Family Muki-Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional InstitutionaUGovemment Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single-Family Multi-Famiy General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gaUday/unit (tenant) 4082 gaUday/unit (tenant) 973 gaUday/unit (tenant) 6412 gaUday/unit (tenant) 1750 gaUday/unit (tenant) 2020 gaUday/unit (tenant) 1863 gaUday/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gaUday/acre 2020 gaUday/acre 1863 gaUday/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 K nuor~~aaamooc Peg99of 10 Rev ------ wn anmrvasn+m+eeeM+orw~+~(r ATTACHMENT B • Contact the school distract for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 . High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909) 988$511 wo v~~arvas~neoaeaewnaweaKeiwvow~amuyax page 10 of 10 Rev. ~rnoa ~j ~ (~/ ~ k .~ ux~ ~~~ ~F i ~ .:"`:. ~i ~ 1~ t. PROJECT FILES: DRC2005-00106, DRC2005-00107, DRC2005-00220 SUBTPM17156 SUBTT17455 ~~~~~ r1 SOURCES GUASTIC, CA QUAD MAP NINTH AND gFEi9 MADRONE City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project Files: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-00106 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to change the land use designation from General Commercial to Park for 3 4 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Drive, and to change the land use designation from General Indusfrial (Subarea 1) to Medwm Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 554 acres of land, located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue -APN 207-262-18 (portion of) and 27 Related files Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00107, Tentabve Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP -request to change the zoning designation from General Commercial to Park for 3 4 acres of land located on the east side of Madrone Avenue, between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Dnve, and to change the land use designation from General Industrial (Subarea 1) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 554 acres of land, located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue -APN 207-262-18 (portion of) and 27 Related files General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A request to subdivide 12 8 acres of land into three parcels within the General Commercial and General Industrial (Subarea 1) Distracts, located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Madrone Avenue -APN 0207-262-18 and 27 Related files General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00107, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17455 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP - A residential subdivision of 554 acres of land into 64 condominiums, in the Medwm Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue -APN 0207-262-18 and 27 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00220 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP -The design review of budding elevations and site plan for 64 condominiums on 554 acres of land in the Medwm Residential Distract (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue - APN 0207-262-18 and 27 2. Related Files. Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00544 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00218 3. Description of Protect. The applicant is proposing to develop 64 new condominwm unds approximately 600 feet east of the northeast corner of 9th Street and Madrone Avenue To faalitate the proposed protect a number of actions are regwred including a change to the General Plan and Zoning land use designations for the two existing parcels that currently compnse the site, approval of a parcel map to create three new separate parcels, and a tract map and design review for development of the proposed condominwm units E~ ~ ~ ao Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 2 The following Is a summary description of the current land use designations and uses and a breakdown of the other elements of the protect Current Land Use Designations 8 Development Existing APN Lot Area Existing General Plan Desi nation Existing Zoning Des! nation Existing Use(s) Cask-N-Cleaver restaurant complex 0207-262-018 9 31 ac General General (including restaurant, storage, 2-story Commercal Commercial corporate office building, cabinet shop, and parking) • Six small residential cottages 8689 9th SVeet & 8651 Madrone Ave • Two Residential Structures used as 0207-262-027 2 40 ac General General offices for a company that arranges industrial Industrial transportation and storage of trucks and cars 8714 9th Street Proposed Changes to Land Use Designation & Tentative Parcel Map To permit the development of residential units on the subtect site, the current land use designations must be amended to a land use designation that allows residential development Because the change m land use designations involves more than one parcel, a new parcel map has been proposed to create three new separate parcels out of the two parcels that curcently comprise the site The proposed parcel map will result in a smaller overall land area for the Cask-N-Cleaver complex, the setting aside of an area for the future development of a neighborhood park, and the creation of a parcel large enough to develop the proposed condominiums The proposed lot sizes and their new land use designations are summarized in the following table Tentative Lot Proposed General Proposed Zoning Proposed Future Map 17156 Area Plan Designation Designation Uses Lot Number 1 554 ac Residential Medum Residential Medium 64 Condominiums (8-14 DU's /Acre) (8-14 DU's /Acre) 2 3 36 ac. Overlay Park Park Public Park' 3 2 80 ac General Commercial General Commercial Restaurant Upon approval of the change in the General Plan and Zoning land use designations, the 3 4-acre park site will be purchased by the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency Tentative Tract Map 17455 ti Design Review for Proposed Condominiums: As required by state law and local ordinance a tentatroe tract map has been filed for and submitted to create the proposed 64 condominium units Upon completion of the units, the Redevelopment Agency will purchase 29 of the condomlum units to lease as part of its plans to make available affordable ~j~ G- a, ~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 3 housing units within the community The units purchased by the Redevelopment Agency will leased for 30 years The remaining 35 unds will be sold at market rate As with all protects in the community, the condominium protect will be subiect to the City's DevelopmenUDesign review process to ensure that the protect is consistent with all applicable gwdelines, standards, and ordinances Finally, an application for Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00218 has been submitted to remove approximately 32 trees located on the condommwm site 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners, LP 18201 Von Korman Avenue, Swte 900 Irvine, CA 92612 Contact R Stan Smith (949) 660-7272 5. General Plan Designation: Presently the land use designations for the site are General Commercial (far APN 207-262-018) and General Industrial (for APN 207-262-027) 6. Zoning: Presently the zoning for the site is General Commercial (for APN 0207-262-018) and General Industrial -Sub Area 1 (for APN 0207-262-027) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The protect site is partially developed with improvements (structures and parking lot) being concentrated generally at southwest quadrant of the site around the Cask & Cleaver restaurant and office/warehouse buildings Near the center of the site, are six "studio" dwelling units constructed from recycled building materials and used as rentals The site has a gradual slope to the southwest with trees generally concenUated along the south and north boundaries of the project Surrounding the site are apartments and single-family homes on large lots to the north, vacant land zoned for Industrial Park uses (Subarea 17) to south (across 9th Street), non-conforming industrial uses to the east, and townhome and single-family development to the west (across Madrone Avenue) 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Croic Center Drrve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9 Contact Person and Phone Number: Michael Diaz, Senior Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY-The following abbreviations are used m this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAOMD -South Coast Air Quality Management Distract SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ~ C` ~ _~ Initial Studv for ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mdigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages OAesthetics O Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality OBiological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Sods ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use 8 Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population 8 Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities 8 Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the protect proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wdl be prepared. () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the proposed protect MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requred, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately m an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is regwred LJ Prepared By Reviewed ey Date 4~ (a•os Date O Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 5 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial affect a scenic wsta~ () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, () () () (/) but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic bwldings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character () () () (/) or quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments• a) There are no significant vistas within or adlacent to the prolect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The prolect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and Madrone Avenue and is partially developed with improvements (structures and parking lot) being concentrated generally at southwest quadrant of the site around the Cask & Cleaver restaurant and office/warehouse buildings Surrounding the site are apartments and single-family homes on large lots to the north, vacant land zoned for Industrial Park uses (Subarea 17) to south (across 9th Street), non-conforming industrial uses to the east, and townhome and single-family development to the west (across Madrone Avenue) The changes in the land use designations for the subject properties and subsequent development of condominiums and a park will not degrade the visual quality of the area Furthermore, design review is regwred prior tc approval To minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility Imes and utility enclosures, the developer of the condominium portion of the prolect will be regwred to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities along the adlacent portion of 9th Street in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The prolect will result in the installation of new streetlights and building-mounted or site lighting used in the prolect area The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which regwre review for consistency with City standards that requves shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to control glare Overall, the impact from lighting is not considered to be signficant 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Woutd the pro/ect a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or O O O (/) a Williamson Act contract ~~ ~ ~ ~--~.y Initial Studv for • DRC2005-00107, SUBTT' c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments• a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mator concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts wthin the City c) Surrounding the site are apartments and single-faintly homes on large lots to the north, vacant land zoned for Industrial Park uses (Subarea 17) to south (across 9th Street), non- conforming industrial uses to the east, and townhome and single-family development to the west (across Madrone Avenue). The nearest identified agricultural use is approximately 1'/~ mtle to the southeast from the protect site Therefore, no adverse impacts are antiapated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase () () () (/) of any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create obtectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State . standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated City of Rancho Cucamonga Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 7 b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction actiwties While most of the dust would settle on or near the prolect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions assoaated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and they would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and egwpment emissions are regwred to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. ~j~ v ~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005 00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page S 6) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactnre construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM„ emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel- powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted m the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G (Urban Emissions Model 7G) model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Particulate Matter (PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less than significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Ovemdmg Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. . In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Counal c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Counal The protect proposed is consistent wdh the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care faalities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within '/,-mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within Y.-mile of sensitive receptors and would ~,~ U a~ Initial Study for DRC2005-00107 City of Rancho Cucamonga >0 Page 9 emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401 The prolect site is surrounded by residential units, and is located within Y.-mile of Los Amigos Elementary School, a senstive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are antiepated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or O O U (/) through habitat modifications, on any speees identified as a candidate, sensdroe, or speaal status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian () () () (/) habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Intertere substantially with the movement of any () () () (/) native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established natroe resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local pollees or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments: a) Surrounding the site are apartments and single-family homes on large lots to the north, vacant land zoned far Industrial Park uses (Subarea 17) to south (across 9th Street), non- conforming industrial uses to the east, and townhome and single-family development to the west (across Madrone Avenue) The undeveloped portions of the site (north and eastern areas) have been previously disrupted during annual diseng for weed abatement According to the General Plan Exhibd IV3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensdrve biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent wdh the General Plan Land Use Plan • • c ~ U-~g • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107, SUBTT17455, & DRC2005-00220 Page 10 b) The prolect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the prolect will not have any impacts in this area of concern. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, prolect implementation will have no impact on these resources d) The malonty of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are approximately 145 trees on-site including two Eucalyptus windrows one remnant located near 9th Street and the other at the northerly boundary Because of their size, many of trees qualify as heritage trees as defined by Tree Preservation Ordinance According to the arbonst report (Knapp Assoaates -March 12, 2005), more than half of the trees on-site, including the two windrows, are in poor condition and should be replaced As part of this prolect, the applicant has applied for a tree removal permit for those trees (approximately 32) on the condominwm site Only six of these trees (including four Eucalyptus trees) were rated suitable for retention The trees located on the other two parcels will be retained in place until a later date when plans for further development are submitted for City review and approval f) The prolect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibd IV-4 No conflicts wdh habitat conservation plans will occur 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the pro/ect a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indvectly destroy a unique () (/) () ( ) paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those () () () (/) interred outside of formal cemeteries Comments• a) As described above, the site is partially developed with structures The existing single-family residence/guesthouse, located at 6714 9th Street, was built in the late 1960s and has no architectural or historic value This home will be demolished to make way for the new condominwms on Lot 1 of the proposed subdivision map The City of Rancho Cucamonga has identified the Cask-N-Cleaver restaurant and six cottages located on Lots 2 and 3 of the proposed map as having potential local and national historical landmark status These buildings were bwlt by Konstany Stys, a Polish immigrant and creator of the Russian Village neighborhood in nearby Claremont, California, which is listed on National Register of Historic Places No change to these structures will be made as part of the proposed change in the General Plan and Zoning land use designations, nor with the subsequent development of the condominwm units on the far east of the prolect sde (Lot 1 of Tentative Parcel Map No 17156) Therefore, there will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the prolect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga • DRC2005-00106, DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455, & DRC2005-00220 Page 11 according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actrv~ties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 511) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvwm, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvwm per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the project site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures. Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing actrv~ties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. ~~~~ ~-~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106, DRC2005-00107, SUBTT17455, & DRC2005-00220 Page 12 d) The proposed prolect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The prolect site has already been disrupted by construction of the existing structures and annual discing for weed abatement No known religious or sacred sites exist within the prolect area No evidence is in place to suggest the prolect site has been used for human bunals The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is requred for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated r~ ~....~ 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the pro~ech a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the nsk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault9 Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Speaal Publication 42 u) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) m) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction? iv) Landshdesl O O O (/) b) Result in substantial sotl erosion or the loss of () (/) () ( ) topsod7 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is () () () (/) unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the prolect, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Bwldmg Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the () () () (/) use of septic tanks or altematroe wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments• a) No known faults pass through the site, nor is d within an Earthquake Fault Zone, as determined from the General Plan Exhibit V-1 and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The nearest fault hazard zones are the Red Hill Fault, which is approximately %mde to the north of the site, while the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 miles further north These faults are both capable of producng M„, 6 0-7 0 earthquakes The San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7 5 earthquakes, is 11 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is 16 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking, but adhering to the Unrfonn Bwldmg Code well ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-signficent ~~/~31 Irntial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106, DRC2005-00107, SUBTT17455, & DRC2005-00220 Page 13 b) The proposed prolect wdl regwre the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site sods The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generate blowing sand and dust, and create erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this prolect under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, bwldings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-sigmficant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soli off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emisslons. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aqufer The prolect does not requve the withdrawal of water from an existing aquifer The site is also not located within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 No adverse impacts are anbapated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of sods are not considered to be expansive According to the geotechnical investigation report prepared for the site (by C H J Inc , 2005), sods encountered on the site generally consist of gravelly sands of medwm to very dense states, consistent with the Gravelly Loamy Sand sod identified for this area of the City in General Plan Exhibit V-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated e) No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed for the prolect The proposed condominwms wdl connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would fhe pro/ect () () () (/) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous matenals~ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mde of an existing or proposed school ~~ C_~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005 00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 14 d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a protect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area f) For a protect within the vianrty of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the protect result m a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with () () () (/) an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, in/ury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adtacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments• a) The protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City partiapates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergences Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed protect does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City partiapates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticpated c) Los Amigos Elementary school is located within '/.-mile of the protect site However, the change in land use designations for the site, subsequent construction of residential units, and a future park are not changes or uses that will emit hazardous emissions, handle hazardous, acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste that will impact the school Therefore, no impacts are anticipated d) The proposed protect site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site A Phase I Environmental Assessment (ALTEC Testing & Engineering -March 2005) was prepared for the property (existing residence and guesthouse) at 8714 9th Street No evidence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials, or presence of significant chemicals were discovered on the site other than household cleaners and chemicals that will need to be properly disposed prior to demolition of the structures in question As part of the Phase I assessment, an asbestos survey was also conducted which revealed small quantities of asbestos-containing materials (e g ,floor tile, Transite vent pipe, ~,F;G~3 Initial Study for DRC2005-001 C City of Rancho Cucamonga mastic, window putty, etc) within the bwlding As standard practice, prior to the issuance of permits for demolibon of these structures, the applicanUdeveloper wdl be regwred to submd written verification from the SCAOMD indicating that asbestos substances have been appropriately removed and disposed Based on the above information and standard regwrement regarding the abatement of asbestos-containing materials prior to demoldion, no significant adverse impact in this area is anticpated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The prolect site is located approximately 1-mde north of the Ontario Airport and is not directly in the Flight path of its runways No impact is anticipated ~ The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 Y: miles to the west of the Citys westerly limits No impact is anticpated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fve District m the event of a disaster Because the overall site is and will remain accessible from the street, and the condominwm portion of the prolect will comply with all applicable City codes and have at least two points of public street access, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wmd-driven fire in the Urban Wtldland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fve Distract Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed prolect site is not located wdhrn a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ech O O (/) ( ) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or () () () (/) interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g , the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing dramage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of () () () (/) the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff m a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off- site~ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would () () () (/) exceed the capaaty of existing or planned stormwater dramage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) G~~fr~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 16 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (/) as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area () () () (/) structures that would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, intury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments• a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction actively over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requving a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction actiwties covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or sigmficant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit regwres all dischargers to comply with the following during construction actrvelies, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from mowng off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges A construction pro/ect for new development or significant redevelopment regwres an NPDES permit Construction pro/ect proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP To comply with the NPDES, the protect's construction contractor will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP for the condominwm portion of the protect, (prepared by MDS Consulting/March 2005), that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded sods, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, od/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm dram system. The following mitigation measures would be regwred to ,control additional storm water effluent ~ ~~ ~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 17 Construction Achvd~es 1 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. 2. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included m the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced m southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3 During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4. During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construchon Operational 5. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS Consulting (March 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6. Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the Crty for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided by groundwater sources in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will requve the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing agwfer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted m the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes m absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a sde, however, the protect wdl not alter the course of any stream or aver All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram faalities, which have been designed to handle EjF,G-~6 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 18 the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect wdl not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect wdl cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new bwlding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Budding Offiaal and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site wdl not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are antiapated. e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new budding and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff wail be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are antiapated f) Grading actiwties assoaated with the construction penod could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is regwred to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identltying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2004. 8. Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The protect does not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is located within the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) designated Flood Zone X, which is depicted by areas to be outside the 100-year and/or 500- year floodplains (FEMA Map, Community-Panel No 06071C-8360F) The site is also not located within a 100-year flood hazard area as depicted in General Pian Exhibit V-5 and that would otherwise impede or redirect flood flows No adverse impacts are expected i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debns dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined EFG-3'7 Irntial Studv for DRC2005-00107, SUBTT17455 & City of Rancho Cucamonga ZO Page 19 channels, and underground storm drains as shown m General Plan Exhibit V-6 The prolect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected I) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the prolect sde, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically dmde an established wmmuniryl () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with lunsdiction over the prolect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation () () () (/) plan or natural community conservation plan Comments: a) Surrounding the site are apartments and single-family homes on large lots to the north; vacant land zoned for Industrial Park uses (Subarea 17) to south (across 9th Street), non- conforming industrial uses to the east, and townhome and single-family development to the west (across Madrone Avenue) The proposed change in the land use designations for the site are intended to make possible the approval of a new tract map and the subsequent development of a future public park and approximately 64 condominium units, that will be consistent and compatible with the development of the surrounding area The prolect will then become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated b) The current General Plan and Zoning land use designations for the subject site are consistent, and the proposal to amend the land use designations will be as well As part of the amendment process, the City will determine whether the changes are appropriate for the site in question and that the changes will more effectively implement the General Plan goals and objectives If approved, subsequent development and use of the site will also be required to be consistent wdh the General Plan, intent of the Development Code, and the polices for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticpated c) The prolect sde is not located within any habdat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the prolect site is not within an area of sensdive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered speces of plants or animals because of the fact that the prolect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan r ~ LJ r~ LJ L J ~; j; G-~8 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 20 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the prolect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result m the loss of availabtlity of a locally () () () (/) important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11. NOISE. Would the pro/ect result ~n a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise () () () (/) levels in excess of standards established m the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessve () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the prolect viarnty above levels existing wthout the prolect? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the prolect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect? e) For a prolect located within an airport land use plan () () () (/) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the prolect expose people residing or working in the prolect area to excessive noise levels f) For a prolect wdhin the viandy of a private airstrip, O O O (/) would the prolect expose people residing or working m the prolect area to excessive noise levels Comments: a) The prolect site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out No adverse impact is expected with the change m land use designations and the subsequent development of residential units and a future neighborhood park b) The uses associated with this application do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated Initial Study for Clty of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 21 c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the wcimty of the protect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equpment, will temporarily generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m and 6.30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced m intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible In first phase. . The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be requred 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is within 2 miles of a public arport Located approximately one mile north of the Ontario Airport but is not within the flight path planes taking off or landing No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2Yz miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, () () () (/) either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 22 c) Displace substantial numbers of people, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments' a) The protect wdl result in the development of housing units on approximately half of the site and a moderate increase in the local resident population However, the proposed changes in the land use designations and subsequent development of condominiums on a portion of the sde will be consistent with the land use designations and residential development found on adtoining properties to the north and west of the site No significant impacts are anticipated b) The protect will not result in the displacement of substantial numbers of existing housing units The overall sde contains seven residential units, only one of which will be demolished to make way for 64 new condominium units on the east side of the site Moreover, the Redevelopment Agency will purchase 29 of the new condomwum units to lease as affordable housing units for 30-years With the development of new residential units on the site, there will be no adverse impact to housing within the City c) The matority of the site is currently used far non-residential purposes or is undeveloped No significant impacts are anticpated 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilihes, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order fo maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ect~ves for any of the public services () () () (/) a) Fire protection b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities () () () (/) Comments: a) The protect site is located approximately 1%rmile from Station 172 located near the intersection of San Bernardino Road and Archibald Avenue The protect will not require the construction of any new faalities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new faalities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Police protection and routine patrols of the site and surrounding areas is provided by the Rancho Cucamonga substation of the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department The eventual construction of new condominiums on the eastern portion of the site wdl not adversely change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and not requre a substantial increase in patrols beyond that, which regularly occurs Therefore, adddional police protection is not regwred c) The Cucamonga School Distract and the Chaffey Joint Union High School Distract serve the area in which the protect is located Both school distracts have been notified regarding the E f,6--~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 23 proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is Bear Gulch Park, located approximately 1-mile northeast from the prolect site As mentioned in the prolect description, the overall plans for the prolect include the development of a public neighborhood park on 3 36 acres of the site be developed at a later date, within 3 to 5 years The park area will be reserved until the City has allocated sufficient funds for the prolect As such, the anticipated park will meet the open space and recreational needs of the existing residents as well as the new residents of the condominiums As a standard condition of approval, the developer will be regwred to pay Park Development Fees. Thus, no significant impacts are anticpated e) The proposed prolect will utilize existing public faalities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The prolect will not regwre the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new faalities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the prolected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the prolected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Counal The proposed prolect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the prolected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14. RECREATION. Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational faalities such that substantial physical deterioration of the faality would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the prolect include recreational faalities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational faalities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments• a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is Bear Gulch Park, located approximately 1-mile from the prolect site One element of this prolect is the development of 64 condominwms that will result in the increased use of public parks or other recreational faalities within the City As indicated above, land area within the prolect area will be set aside for the development of a public park at a later date A standard condition of approval will regwre the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a)response above ~.J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 24 15. TRANSPORTATIONffRAFFIC. Would the project a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level () () () (/) of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety asks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design () () () (/) feature (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g , farm egwpment)7 e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity O O O (/) g) Conflict wdh adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The project is in an area where street improvements (e g , curb, gutter, and sidewalk) are being installed as new development occurs The developer of the condominiums will also be requved to install street improvements along the street frontage of the condominium site per City roadway standards Based on the Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model, the estimated traffic generation rate expected from the condominium protect was calculated at 386 76 Average Datly Trips (ADT) According to the Traffic Engineering Department, 9th Street is classified as a Collector Street with a maximum build out capacity of 10,000 Average Dady Trips (ADT) At maximum build out for the area, it is expected that ADT will be at approximately 70 percent of full capaaty Moreover, Level of Service (LOS) at the nearby intersections of 9th Street wdh Baker and Vineyard Avenues is expected to remain at LOS C or better Based on the findings provided in the above table and information regarding street capacity presented above, the proposed protect (including subsequent development) is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated As such, the protect wdl not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle taps, traffic volume or congestion at nearby intersections In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each condominium unit will generate 56 two-way peak hour trips daily As such, the total trips generated for all 64 condominums will be 37 two-way peak hour trips, which is less than 250 two-way peak hour taps for non- retail uses, therefore, is below the threshold of the San Bernardino Congestion Management Plan (CMP) cnteria for requiring a traffic impact analysis The protect sde is in an area that is GJ ~ ~-y~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 25 largely developed with ali street improvements The protect will not negatively impact the LOS standards on adtacent arterials Moreover, the developer will be regwred to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are anticipated , c) Located approximately 1-mile north of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticpated d) The protect is in an area that is steadily being developed As a part of the condomniwm portion of the protect, new street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along 9th Street will be regwred The protect design does not include any sharp curves, dangerous intersections, or farming uses that would present a conflict or hazard with the proposed changes in the land use designation and subsequent development of condominwms on a portion of the overall site The protect will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated. f) Each portion of the overall protect, including the existing restaurant, new condominium units, and future public park will have adequate on-site parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are antiapated. g) The protect design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16. UTILRIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the pro/ect~ () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Requre or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facililies, the construction of which could cause significant envronmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing faalit~es, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve O O O (/) the protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater () () () (/) treatment provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that rt has adequate capacity to serve the protect's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permdted O O O (/) capacty to accommodate the protect's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? E~~ G---~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga . DRC2005-00106 DRC2005-00107 SUBTT17455 8 DRC2005-00220 Page 26 Comments: a) The proposed protect is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RPM treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The protect is required to meet the requrements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The protect is regwred to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm dram facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer pnor to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed protect is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontaro, neither of which are at capacty No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the curent City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the Crty's solid waste disposal needs g) This protect will comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are antcpated 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife speaes, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the motor periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a protect are considerable when viewed in connection wdh the effects of past protects, the effects of other current protects, and the effects of probable future protects) c) Does the protect have environmental effects that () () () (/) will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ~~ F G -~S Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106, DRC2005-00107, SUBTT17455 & DRC2005-00220 Page 27 Comments: a) The site ~s not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be regwred to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of budd- out inthe City and Sphere of Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air qualty, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and casual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Gwdelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is regwred. c) Development of the site under the proposed changes in the land use designations for the subject site will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction actmties were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mtigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this protect were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) L=~~, ~~~ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2005-00106 DRC2005 00107 SUBTT17455 8 DRC2005-0D220 Pape 28 gpPl1CANT CERTIFlCATION I certify that 1 am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, 1 have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate Ute effects to a point where cl/ea/r/ly~no~s~gnifcant environmental effects would occur. / ApplipnPs Signature•~ ' '^ "'ten i~~~T/T- - Date• S! ~8 /D 5 Print Name and Title _ ~ 57?+.y SM 1 T1-I VtG~ ~~~ ~u"f' ~~~~y /' City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review !n accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Development Distract Amendment DRC2005-00107, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, Tentative Tract Map 17455, and Development Review 2005-00220 Public Review Period Closes: May 25, 2005 Project Name: Project Applicant: Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners, LP Project Location (also see attached map): Generally located northeast of 9th Street and Madrone Avenue - APN. 0207-262-18 See protect description. Project Description: A request to change the land use and zoning designations from General Commercal to Park for 3 4 acres of land on the east side of Madrone Avenue, between Sandalwood Court and Richwood Drive, a request to change the land use designation from General Industrial (Subarea 1) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 5 54 acres of land, located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue, a subdivision of 12 8 acres of land into three parcels within the General Commercial and General Industrial (Subarea 1) Districts, located at the northeast comer of 9th Street and Madrone Avenue, and a subdmsion of 5 54 acres of land into 64 condominiums and the design review of bwlding elevations and site plan for same on 554 acres of land, located on the north side of 9th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Madrone Avenue. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: ^ The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment ® The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects buY (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect as revised may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Mav 25. 2005 Date of Determination Adopted jy~n ~/ / CS ~j RESOLUTION NO 05-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2005-00108, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO PARK FOR 336 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MADRONE AVENUE, BETWEEN SANDALWOOD COURT AND RICHWOOD DRIVE, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (SUBAREA 1) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 5 54 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OF MADRONE AVENUE,/ AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-262-18 (PORTION OF) AND 27. A Recitals 1. Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners, LP requested a change to the General Plan land use designations, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subtect amendment is refened to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of May 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fads set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and coned 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 25, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a The application applies to property within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment, and c The proposed amendment is consistent with the land use concept and density provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The proposed land use changes will more effectively implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that they will encourage orderly development of the site that is generally consistent and compatible with development surrounding the site The requested land use changes and associated parcel map enable the applicant to make more efficient use of land by replacing partially undeveloped land and non-conforming industrial uses with new residential development and open space for a public park The land use changes will result in fewer land use conflicts between commerciaUndustnal uses and surrounding residential development. The proposal well eliminate an ewsting unsightly ~,rU~~9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-39 DRC2005-00106 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 2 and non-conforming industrial use from the north side of 9th Street where the area is largely developed with residential uses Moreover, 9th Street serves as a logical dividing line between residential uses on the north and future "light industrial" uses antiGpated for the south side of the street The proposed Medwm Residential (&14 DUs/Acre) land use designation for the largest parcel wall be consistent with the density levels of residential development on nearby parcels on the north side of 9th Street Apartments exist to the north, and townhome and single-family development ewst on the west side of Madrone Avenue. Thus, the proposal will result in a land use pattem that is consistent vnth the existing land use designations and development pattem of the area. The reservation of land area for the future development and use as a public park will address the need for more park space in this area of the commurnty as identified in the General Plan When the park is completed, it wall further improve and strengthen the existing residential neighborhood on the north side of 9th Street 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above-referenced public heanng and upon the speufic findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and conGudes as follows. a The proposed land use amendment does not conflict Hnth the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area; and b The proposed amendment will not be dethmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the viGmty, and c. The proposed amendment is in conforinance wrath the General Plan. 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports inGuded for the environmental assessment for the application, the Plamm~g Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect wall have a signficant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, based upon the findings as follows. a That the Mitigated Negative DeGaration has been prepared in compliance wrath the Cal~fomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent /udgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration wrath regard to the applcation. b The Mitigated Negative Decaration identifies no significant environmental effect will result'rf this amendment is approved. c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Calrfomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows• In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect well have potential for an adverse impact upon vhldlrfe resources or the habitat upon which wddlrfe depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the inforinaUon provided to the Plamm~g Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the E~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-39 DRC2005-00106 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 3 presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o•1-d) of Title 14 of the Calrfomia Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, as shown in the attached Exhibit A Environmental MiUaation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City venfication 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the Crty denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction d equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated an found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction egwpment shall comply Hnth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of Ume Schedule activities to minim¢e the amounts of exposed excavated soil dunng and after the end of work penods. ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-39 DRC2005-00106 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 4 Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high winds (i.e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance wdh Rule 403 requirements Maintain a minimum 24inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be Veated with water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM,a emissions, in accordance vinth SCAQMD Rule 403 ~ Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or Gean altemaUve fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews vinll shut off equipment when not in use 10) All residential and commeroial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or sign cant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. ~~ ~ ~~a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-39 DRC2005-00106 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 5 • Consider establishing provisions to regwre incorporation of archaeologipl sites wnthin new developments, using their speGal qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on sign~icant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, following appropnate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources Hnthrn the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with onginal illustrations, to the San Bemardrno County Archaeological InfornaUon Center for permanent archiving. 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct apre-construction field survey of the protect site. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that Hall also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitonng) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monrtonng is appropnate, the program must inGude, but not be limited to, the following measures. • Assign a paleontological monitor, framed and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval of earth-disturbing acUwUes Should fossils be found within an area being Geared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the montor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find 3) Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens Huth a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geologic acrd Soils 1) The site shall be treated vnth water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,a • emissions, in accordance Hnth SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with e drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.05-39 DRC2005-00106 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 6 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,a emissions associated with vehide tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the Ume of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Wafer Quabty 1) Pnor to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Stone Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specfiically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-sde to reduce pollutants during construction activities entenng the stone drain system to the maxmum extent pradacal. M 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, inducted in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall indude the following measures at a minimum• a) Specrfy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy penods experienced in southern Calrfomia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be conected through a remediation or restoration program within a specrfied Ume frame 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the sde when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS Consulting (March , 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the stone drain system to the maximum extent practical. C; F Cr -~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-39 DRC2005-00106- RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 7 6) Landscaping plans shall inGude provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesbcides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, inGuding monitonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Pnor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect descnption and identdying BMPs that vinll be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Boats Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identrfication Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, inGuding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specrfied in Development Code Section 17.02 120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specrfied in Development Code Section 17 02.120 Monitonng at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, rf noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Offiaal If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance ~th above noise standards or hatted 3) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 4) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m. and 6 30 a m on weekdays, inGuding Saturday, or at any F,Cs -~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-39 DRC2005-00106-RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 8 time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY. Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2005, by the following vote-to-wR• AYES COMMISSIONERS: NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~., F, G~~ / / / / / / / I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I / / I / / ! / l l / ! ! I / / / / I / / / J / / / / / / / / / / / J / / / ! / / / / 0 SITE BOUNDARY PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN MEDIUM 300 0 300 600 Feet ® GENERAL COMMERCIAL /,/, GENERAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK FLOOD CONTROL /UTILITY CORRIDOR ® PARK DRC2005-00106 GPA hib~~ "~" ~,F,U~ _ //, / • IY1CL/.ILTlY1 - ///// // /~/// / // /I // /! // / .... ~ .. / I/ // // // // I _ .. _ ... ///I/////////I// ... .• .. ~ .. ~ ///////I/I/////l .. ~ /////I/////////I / // // // // // I/ // I RICHWOOD / / / / , / / / / / ////////.///////, ////~~ / I'/"/"I / / /~C !//// i / // // /I // /I // // // // / /I /I /I // // ~/ // /i 9TH ././///////// /// ///////// r//l///I ( ~ ~ ~ ~~// / I / / I I I / ! / _ / / / / I / // // // // //.~/~/~/~/~I // // // // // / I/ // // I/ l/ / /////////// ./ // // // Y/ // /~ :r/////'/'/'/ //////, SITE BOUNDARY EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 300 0 300 600 Feet © MEDIUM ® GENERAL COMMERCIAL / / GENERAL INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK ® FLOOD CONTROL /UTILITY CORRIDOR DRC2005-00106 GPA L; ~ Cry • C_ J City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2005-00107, DRC2005-00220 General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Development Distnct Amendment Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, and Development Review This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary. This . procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As mondonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and properaction is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps wall be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation well be kept in the protect file wrath the department having the onginal authority for processing the protect Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: . City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamon[g~a, CA 9/1730 Mitigation Momtonng Program GPA DRC2005-00106, DDA DRC2005-00107, SUBTPM17156, and DR DRC2005-00220 Page 2 3. Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activities and provide appropnate wntten approvals to the protect planner. 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the speafic phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring Hnll be signed off as completed by the protect planneror responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Forrn. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requinng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Fomt will be completed bythe protect planneror responsible Cityilepartment and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng after wntten notification has been issued. The protect planneror responsible City department also has the • authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff Ume to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requinng long-term protect momtonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the momtonng results to the City. Said plan shall identitythe reporter as an individual qualfied to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The momtonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of bwlding permits. ~ s • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.'s: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106• Develo ment DistrictAmendment DRC2005-00107• Tentative Parcel Mao SUBTP17156: and Tentative Tract Maa SUBTT17455 Applicant: Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners LP Initial Study Prepared by: Michael Diaz Date: Anrit ~~ Anna ~_' 1 .~', ~I . . ~. , . ' ., . ... •. • _ 4~^'. S ` ~ - .L~ '*` a ~ ~ p~.y " ~ »~ ~. t~ ",e ~.. All con t t r ~ei,$", , `w+v'~.r .:.* ^a, . r.a ..4 .4-n.. b=~~~ i~ ~ c eF-.r,~'~ar . ,x s ruc ion egwpment shall be maintained in good CP C operating condition so as to reduce operational Review of plans A/C 2/4 emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' speafications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Pnor to the issuance f o any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the Cit CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 y denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions 1 of 8 `~ ~~ p~ Y~ .- ,. , .. ... ~. • ~, .. . • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 • Phase gradin to r t th g p even e susceptibility of large BO C R f l areas to erosion over extended periods of time eview o p ans AIC yq • Schedule actroities to m inimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod during and after the end of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 work periods • Dispose of s l urp us excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound BO C Review of plans A 4 engineering practices • Swee streets d p accor ing to a schedule established BO C D by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public uring q 4 thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with construction SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RW QCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance v~nth SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel powered egwpment where feasible 2 of~ ~~~ , \11 -. ~. .~ The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not m use All residential and commeraal structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commeraal structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 requred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources _ u° = _ z - If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developerwdl retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wdl • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Rewew of report AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines 3of8 n \,1 `~ ~. .. • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report AID 3l4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconsWCtion CP B AID field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall Review of report 4 submit a report of findings that will also provide speafic recommendations regarding further minga4on measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigabon monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time dunng the interval ofearth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report AID 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing ac4wties elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submd a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Soils .;~, . K~,. ., _ _ t-x moo; F v,, ~ ,..w ' s~:z~'~,~~o-e , Y'. Y:' "x~ "~~::. t ~C^ ~' ' a4 ~'A Pik," M in, Y ~ _ , The sde shall be treated wdh water or other sod- BO C Dunng A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) construction daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 4 of~ ~h ~j~ 1 . , .. , . .- -. .. ~. .. .. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o Dunng construction q q emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of sod off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind d BO C Dunng q spee s exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes construction 4 Chemical soil-stabilizers (a d b pprove y SCAOMD and BO C D RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction unng q q areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Qu lit ~ - ~ ~ a _ y e _ .~ ,; -,~~; ; -~~~„ ,~ _ , , _ . Prior to issuance of r d g a ing permits, the permit applicant BO B/C/D R f l shall submit to Bwlding Offiaal for approval, Storm evew o p ans AIC yq Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) speafically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction actnrities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2l4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specdythe timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 5of8 ~~ ~1 . , .. .- , ., . -. ~ Durng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent BO ~. B/C/D Review of plans A/C .. . 2/4 discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction to remov ll , e po utants, street cleaning wdl be performed pnor to stor BO BICID Review of plans AIC y4 m events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall im lement th BMP p e s identified m CE B/C/D R f the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared eview o plans AIC 2/4 by MDS Consulting (March 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans sh ll l d a inc u e provisions for controlling and mi BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C y4 nimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticideslherbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits Pnor to issuance of bwldmg permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shalt identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 6 of~ ~'I \ 1 I J l._J ~~ ~. .. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with y4 obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Offical for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise ~ h ,, ~iY ~~L °~Aiwmrv„~~ ~i•KA I%t~?±. q ~N iaY3 h~~ / ~ YM ~1 1XKe." t.iF ~3 isinrylyA t~'$F 1" ~i str Constr uction or radin h ll t t 1 g g s a no ake place between the BO C D hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, uring construction q 4 including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or radin l g g noise evels shall not exceed the BO C D standards speafied in Development Code Section uring construction A 4 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level momtonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Offiaal within 24 hours, however, rf noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planrnng Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction achvihes shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction 7of8 Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, d heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations CP -City Planner or des CE -City Engineer or de BO -Building Official or PO -Police Captain or c ~ FC -Fire Chief or desigi C I Dunng I q construction 4l7 " ~ r ~ ` ~ ~ ,~~; : Monitoring' Frequency: ,fir-~~~° r'Mettiod of~Veiificetton f `"` ` ~ "" ~S• ',"z;.~~sN ~ ~~ , .d,.,e.._.~.,~..v..,.1~ Sanctions: .~~ .` ~~ ~ _ -~„ ~,• rt Director or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map B - Pnor To Construction B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit C -Throughout ConsW coon C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certifipte of Occupancy ''e D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 -Stop Work Order e E - Ooeratino _ _ o - Ketain deposit ar Bonds B Revoke CUP 7 _ Gfebno 8 O~ RESOLUTION NO.05-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO PARK FOR 3.36 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MADRONE AVENUE, BETWEEN SANDALWOOD COURT AND RICHWOOD DRIVE, AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (SUBAREA 1) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 554 ACRES OF LAND,~LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OF MADRONE AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0207-262-18 (PORTION OF) AND 27 A Rentals. 1. Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners, LP requested a change to the Development District land use designations, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject amendment is refer-ed to as "the application." 2 On the 25th day of May 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Commission hereby spe~cally finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rentals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 25, 2005, inGuding written and oral staff reports, together Nnth public testimony, this Commission hereby spe~cally finds as follows a The application applies to property within the City, and b The proposed development distnd amendment will not have a signficant impact on the environment, and c. The proposed development district amendment is consistent with the land use concept and density provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The proposed land use changes vwll more effectively implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan, in that they will encourage orderly development of the site that is generally consistent and compatible with development surrounding the site. The requested land use changes and . assonated parcel map enable the applicant to make more efficient use of land by replacing partially undeveloped land and non-conforming industrial uses with new residential development and open space for a public park The land use changes well result in fewer land use conflicts between commerciaUndustrial uses and surrounding residential development The proposal will E, ~G- -~9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.O5~0 DRC2005-00107 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 2 eliminate an ewstmg unsightly and non-conformng industrial use from the north side of 9th Street where the area ~s largely developed vnth residential uses Moreover, 9th Street serves as a logical dividing Ime between residential uses on the north and future "light industrial" uses antigpated for the south side of the street The proposed Medwm Residential (8-14 DUs/Acre) land use designation for the largest parcel vwll be consistent with the density levels of residential development on nearby parcels on the north side of 9th Street. Apartments exist to the north, and townhome and single-family development exist on the west side of Madrone Avenue. Thus, the proposal will result m a land use pattern that is consistent with the existing land use designations and development pattern of the area The reservation of land area for the future development and use as a public park will address the need for more park space m this area of the community as identified m the General Plan. When the park ~s completed, it will further improve and strengthen the exstng residential neighborhood on the north side of 9th Street 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a. The proposed development district amendment does not conflict moth the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and vwll provide for the logical development of the surrounding area, and . b. The proposed development district amendment moll not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially mturious to properties or improvements in the viunity, and c. The proposed development district amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together Hnth aft written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a signillcent effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, based upon the findings as follows. a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative DeGaraUon and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Declaration Huth regard to the apphcaUon. b. The Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies no signficent environmental effect Hnll result rf this amendment is approved c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Trite 14 of the Caldomia Code of Regulations, the Plannng Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wddln`e resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the E~ ~_, (y --~D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-40 DRC2005-00107 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP . May 25, 2005 Page 3 Mitigated Negative DeGaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the infomtation provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5. Based upon the findings and contusion set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment DRC2005-00107 by adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance, as shown in the attached Exhibd A. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as 1o reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City ve~cetron. • 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit COnStfUChon Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment Hall be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnct (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall inGude the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the consUucUon site through seeding and watenng Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended pencils of Ume. r, G-'~LI PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-40 DRC2005-00107 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP . May 25, 2005 Page 4 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods. Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance moth local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the Gty if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the Ume of year of construction • Suspend grading operations dunng high moods (i e , mood speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance moth Rule 403 regwrements. • Maintain a minimum 24inch freeboard ratio on sods haul Uucks or cover payloads using tarps or other swtable means. 6) The site shall be treated moth water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control BoarcJ . [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 ~ Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inadrve construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiGency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane wnndows and weather-stripping. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist • to mondor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga moll: ~~ ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-40 DRC2005-00'107- RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 . Page 5 • Enact intenm measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant mod cation without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites Hnthm new developments, using their speual qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's arohaeological hentage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on sign cant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, follov~nng appropnate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submd one copy of the completed report with ongmal dlusUaUons, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological InfomlaUon Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualdied paleontologist shall conduct a preconstrudion field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that Hell also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e , paleontologigl monitonng) that may be appropnate Where mitigation mondonng is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the follov~nng measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and egwpped to allow the rapid removal of fossils Hnth minimal construction delay, to the site fulhtime dunng the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notrfy the monitor of the find 3) Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bemardmo County Museum. Geo/ogrc and Sods i 1) The site shall be treated with water or other sod-stabdiz~ng agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o ~;~ G= 73 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-40 DRC2005-00107-RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP • May 25, 2005 Page 8 emissions, in accordance Huth SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehiGe tracking of sod off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site dunng such episodes. 4) Chemical sod-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Pnor to issuance of grading pernits, the permit applicant shall submit to Budding Official for approval a Store Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) spe~cally identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the stone dram system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion ConWl Plan shall be prepared, inGuded in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identfies spec measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall inGude the following measures at a minimum. a) Specrfy the timing of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods expenenced in southern Calrfomia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect vwll be corrected through a remediaUon or restoration program within a specrfied time frame 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street Leaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the sde 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS Consulting (March ~~ ~ ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-40 DRC2005-00107 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 7 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the stone dram system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landsgping plans shall indude provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesUudes/herbiGdes. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including morntonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for rewew and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Pnor to issuance of building pertmts, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, inducting a protect description and identifying BMPs that v~nll be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the stone dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent Hnth the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga m June 2004 8) Pnor to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identfiication Number) shall be submitted to the City Building OffiGal for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, mduding Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specked in Development Code Section 17 02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as speufied m Development Code Section 17 02 120. Momtonng at other times may be regwred by the Budding Officaal. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding OffiGal within 24 hours, however, rf noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Offiual If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-40 DRC2005-00107 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 8 4) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m and 6 30 a m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, rf heavy Ducks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily traps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST' Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS. NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT' COMMISSIONERS: ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00107, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO PARK FOR 3 36 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MADRONE AVENUE, BETWEEN SANDALWOOD COURT AND RICHWOOD DRIVE AND TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (SUBAREA 1) TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 554 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OF MADRONE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 0207-262-18 (PORTION OF) AND 27. A Rentals 1 Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners, LP requested a change to the Development Distract land use designations, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject amendment is referred to as "the application." 2 On the 25th day of May 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application 3. On the day of 2005, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 4. All legal preregwsdes prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred B Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows• 1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on _, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby speafically finds as follows• a The application applies to 12 8 gross acres of land within the General Commercial and Industrial (Sub Area 1) districts, consisting of restauranUoffices, surface parking, small residential cottages, anon-conforming industrial use, and undeveloped land; and b Surrounding the site are apartments and single-family homes on large lots to the north, vacant land zoned for Industrial Park uses (Subarea 17) to the south (across 9th Street), non-conforming industrial uses to the east; and townhome and single-family development to the west (across Madrone Avenue), and ~JF,G=77 DDA DRC2005-00107 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP Page 2 a~ c The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Counal dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speafic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Counal hereby finds and concludes as follows. a. The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Polices of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development, and b. The proposed amendment does promote the goals and obtectives of the Development Code and the General Plan, and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially intunous to properties or improvements in the viarnty; and d. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, this Counal finds that there is no substantial evidence the protect will have a sigrnficant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA gwdelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Irntial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of this Counal, and, further, this Counal has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b That, based upon the facts assoaated with the proposed protect, no signfia3nt adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the Provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, this Counal finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to this Counal dunng the public heanng, the Counal hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Counal hereby approves Development District Amendment DRC2005-00107 by the adoption of the attached Exhibit A 6 The Secretary to this Counal shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance: C-,FG~7g T •i Y`I'v'1 `IT ~ ~ . SANDALWOOD „ , ®. w .... . ® !i3 LJ~f p .: .. ... 9TH 300 0 300 600 Feet 107 M GC GI IP P ® FC ~bPOS~.D Z,ONIn)E DRC2005-00107 DDA G~iy~e/r '~iq'~ c,~ ~-7q ~SRE BOUNDARY ISP SUBAREA 1 BOUNDARYADJUSTMENT ~~ELOPMENT DIST AMENDMENT DRC2005-00 9TH 300 0 300 600 Feet SITE BOUNDARY ~ ~ EXISTING ISP SUBAREA1 BOUNDARY M ® GC 0 IP EXISTING ZONING 0 GI DRC2005-00107 DDA AFC r~~~b~ • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Development Distnct Amendment DRC2005-00107, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, and Development Review DRC2005-00220 This Mitigation Momtonng Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed protect This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements. 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect 2 A procedure of compliance and venfication has been outlined for each action necessary This • procedure designates who will take action, what action wdl be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible gwdelines. As momtonng progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the protect The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The protect planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps wdl be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covenng all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing momtonng or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form wdl be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Momtonng Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who wdl take action, what action wdl betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance wdl be reported All momtonng and reporting documentation volt be kept in the project file with the department hawng the onginal authonty for processing the project Reports wdl be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Ciwc Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program • GPA DRC2005-00106, DDA DRC2005-00107, SUBTPM17156, and DR DRC2005-00220 Page 2 3 Appropriate speaalists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor speafic mitigation activties and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4. The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Fomt After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is regwred for the specific phase of development. 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requinng no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6. Unantiapated circumstances may arise regwnng the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible Citydepartment and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten . notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that regwre monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Diwsion The Diwsion shall regwre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the regwred period of time. 9 In those instances regwnng long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to knowwhether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of budding permits. • C-,F, ~~- • i ~ MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No: s: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106• Development District Amendment DRC2005-00107• Tentative Parcel Map SUBTP17156: and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17455 Initial Study Prepared by: Michael Diaz Applicant: Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners. LP Date: Apri113.2005 •~ .. T '~Y~'-~ F~~ i4. _"1 ~ ~ n" u-' Mr"1 ~4prv~ ~~..rryy v~'^'e~~rt5 }i-0~Y G ' a ' Vii' 4s"j+L:i i` Y ~': v<i. ~`daeF ~...' -'' 3intained in good CP C _ Review of plans . A/C _ S Y v r, } 2/4 uce operational ensure that all Orly serviced and specificabons Bailable at the ~~„~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~e ivy ~.ny venncanon Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the CP/BO C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected egwpment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment will be utilized, or that then use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Review of plans A/C 2l4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions ~Itt ~' 1 1 of 8 ~. .. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of BO C Review of plans AIC Z4 work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During q 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adtacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordancewith construction SCAOMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction swtable means The site shall be treated with water or other sod- BO C During A 4 stabilmng agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C During A 4 RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Revew of plans A/C 4 altemahve fuel powered egwpment where feasible JI • 2 of~ • f ! • rn The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans AIC 2l4 Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off egwpment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Rewew of plans C yq required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and commercal structures shall be BO CID Rewew of plans C p/4 regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-strapping Cultural Resources = °' ~ _ fr ~ f^ ~ ~~_°' ~ e. ~v,~~ ~°~ ~~_~ ~ x ,,, ~~~.~~ ~t f ~ ~ ~ If any prehistoric archaeological resources are _ _.y+F~. al ~ d~:'.4 -_ ~'h;,tP .d.. ~ encountered before or during grading, the developerHnll retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction actmties, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated CPIBO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or sigmficant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to regwre CPIBO C Review of report AID 3/4 ~ incorporation of archaeological sties within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CPIBO C Rewew of report AID 3l4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Rewew of report AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA gwdelines 3 of 8 llt • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report A/D 3l4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction CP B Review of report A/D 4 field survey of the project site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report AID 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval ofearth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Rewew of report AID 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Rewew of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and,Soiis'.~-` yf=~> ;i,~., U . ~ r~~r~`u _k~,~;~ _,t; :,;w~ ~~~<~,, ~ rr ~~~i ~ ~ ''~`. ~, ~~ ~ ~ :``z~~:, ~, rv'v'.• t f R'<i "4 ui'aN'ft -. 3'Y2`x .. F a^L:~e $ 'T.y+ N, _~A~ FINN. "4v~u~'!GS ~ i{}4~a ~'h .w.~ 'd»u"'pu: ~:{ The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 4 of~ ~T11 T l . , .. , - -. ~ .. . Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C . .. schedule established by the City to reduce PM,a Dunng construction q q emissions associated with vehicle tracking of sod off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of ear y of construcbon Grading operations shall b e suspended when wind BO C Dunng q speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions q from the site dunng such episodes construction Chemical sod-stabilizers ( approved by SCAOMD and BO C D RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction uring q q areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,o emissions Nydrology~and Water Quali ""~ - ;' ~~ r~ a _ ~ , ~ ~'ec ~o c1t "T ~~`;ayy~ ~t~~` ~'.r:~°y- ,+li~ f'an 'f , _' `` s ~+--.~~~~~ ~-`M~~f a ~ ~ + ~ , x3~`n ,G F ` ' v " E; ,F ° '~ yps ~~ y ~1~ .x : ~, , ` ~' " _ Prior to issuance of grading permits the permit a licant r ,_ , - - ,x BO ; _. k =q ~ ; s M#"h " ±,.w~ Y - ~ s ` .,;~:' ~.3 '~~ a s_ te. ..vsx;= " ~ a c..,.7 , _ ; r ~, ~•x r ~ , pp shall submit to Budding Offiaal for approval, Storm B/C/D Review of plans AIC p/q Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction actiwhes entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the follovnng measures at a minimum a) Specrfythetiming of grading and construction to minimize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern Calrfornia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this protect wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame 5of8 ~ - -~ . During construction, temporary berms such as BO BICID Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the sde when there is rainfall or other runoff Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be pertormed pnor to storm events and BO BIC/D Rewew of plans AIC 2/q after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by MDS Consulting (March 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall T 1 I be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for 1 review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits Prior to issuance of bwlding permits, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm dram system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 6 of~ `n ~~ S • .. ~ ", ~ -. . . Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant BO 8/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State W ater Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Noise - ~ - ~ ~ ; _"~ - _~ r- `~Jk~: ie s"' 3 ~ ~' : ' 8~ " - .,~ ~~' ~.~ ~ ,z o, n" ~ t~ 3 +. - Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO ro F C x . . ~ + 7.f~ c 3.a. _ _;~i6t.e.. ~ ~ 3 '^4,~ ' :"uN.~ ',".~ s ,~ : hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, Dunng construction A 4 including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C Dunng q 4 standards speafied in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be regwred by the Building Offical Said consultant shall report then findings to the Bwlding Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction actmties shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C Dunng A A as possible in the first phase construction 7of8 ,. .. .. . .- . . ~, .. ... _ .. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, construction qrj including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, rf heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible , the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensltroe land uses or residential dwellings Key to Checklist Abbreviations L'1 d Responsible Person' ~ Monitoring Frequency,=,;, ~:~ '-Method of Veriflcatlon:~~'~~`'~~'`~„ ",Sanctions'"';"` CDD -Community Development Director or designee CP -City Planner or designee A -With Each New Development A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CE -City Engineer or designee B - Pnor To ConsWdion B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwlding Permit 80 -Building Offiaal or designee C -Throughout ConsWction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certfipte of Occupancy PO -Police Captain or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Ptans) 4 -Stop Work Order FC - Fire Chief or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Depositor Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation 8 of~ RESOLUTION NO 05-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17156, A REQUESTTO SUBDIVIDE 12 BGROSSACRESOF LAND INTO THREE PARCELS WITHIN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (SUBAREA 1) DISTRICTS, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND MADRONE AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS tN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN 0207-262-18AND27 A Rentals. 1 Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners, LP filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, as descnbed in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subted Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 25th day of May 2005, the Planning Commission of the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said heanng on that date. 3 All legal preregwsites pnor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution . NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng on May 25, 2005, including wntten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to partially developed property located on the northeast comer of 9th Street and Madrone Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 788 feet on 9th Street and approximately 550 feet on Madrone Avenue, and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with apartments, and townhome and single-family development exist on the west side of Madrone Avenue Further east is non-conforming industnal development and to the south will be new light industrial development; and c. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wnll not be detnmental to the public health, safety, or welfare or matenally intunous to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting on May 12, 2005, to inform the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain feedback, and e The application contemplates the retention of the onginal Cask-N-Cleaver restaurant buildings, the development of a pnvate gated community of 64 condominium units, and reservation of land area for a future public park. ~~ F, Cr-~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-41 SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 2 f The parcel map associated with this project is appropnate m that the proposed parcels are of sufficient size to meet minimum Code regwrements to accommodate antiupated future development g New street improvements assocated Huth the approval of the parcel map will enhance the appearance of the 9th Street streetscepe, and improve pedestrian access/movemeM m the area. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dunng the above- referenced public heanng and upon the speGfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. a That the tentative parcel map is consistent wrath the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speufic plans; and b The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable speGfic plans, and c The site is physically swtable for the type of development proposed, and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable mtury to humans and Hnldl~fe or their habitat; and e The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause senous public health problems; and f The design of the tentative parcel map wdl not conflict wrath any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all wntten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitonng Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows. a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance wdh the California Environmental Quality Ad of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent tudgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained m said Mitigated Negative Decaretion Huth regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that wdl result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the protect, which are listed below as conditions of approval • c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considenng the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaret~on for the project, there is no evidence that the PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-41 SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 3 proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habdat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative DeGaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dunng the public heanng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753 5(o-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and contusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subted to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Deaartment 1) The approval of this application is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106 and Development Distnct Amendment DRC2005-00107 Eng ineering Deaartment 2) Submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that follows current WOMP templates/guidance and regulations set forth by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Access the following website for an updated San Bernardino County WQMP for New Development and Redevelopment Protects . hrip //www swrcb ca gov/rwgcb8/htmUsb_wgmp.htmt This site provides Guidance and Templates that can be filled out electronically and punted Adhere to these guidelines and use the templates provided 3) Along Parcel 3, 9th Street frontage improvements shall be designed and installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 4) All on-site and off-site utilities on 9th Street frontage along Parcel 3 shall be handled according to the underground utility policy. Utilities on the opposite sides of the street fronting the protect shall have fees paid in accordance with the policy Utilities on the protect side of the street fronting the protect shall be undergrounded in accordance with the poligr 5) Ftle with the City Engineer a signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropnate Landscape and Lighting Distnct(s) for Parcels 1, 2 and 3 of the proposed map. The developer shall be responsible for paying the costs related to the formation of the abovementioned Landscape and Lighting Distnct(s). 6) Pay anon-refundable deposit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, covenng the estimated cost of operating all streetlights for Parcel 3 along the 9th Street frontage for the first 6 months of operation. CF,c~3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-41 SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP • May 25, 2005 Page 4 Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance recorcJs shall be available at the construction site for Gty venfication. 2) Pnor to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submR Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and pro/ected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment vwll be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the pro/ect. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distnd (SCAQMD) as well as Gty Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. • 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply vwth SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watenng. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended penods of time Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated sod dunng and after the end of work penods Dispose of surplus excavated matenal in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineenng practices Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is tamed over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Suspend grading operations dunng high wands (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance wrath Rule 403 requirements EjF, Cry PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-41 SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 5 Maintain a minimum 24mch freeboard ratio on soils haul Ducks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated Huth water or other sod-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, m accordance wdh SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inacbve for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electnc or dean aRematrve fueF powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews vmll shut off equpment when not m use 10) All residential and commeraal structures shall be required to incorporate high-effiaency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commeraal structures shall be regwred to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stnpping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistonc archaeological resources are encountered before or dunng grading, the developer Hell retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropnate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact mtenm measures to protect undesignated sties from demolition or significant modification Hnthout an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspeaal quaidies as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological hentage. Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistonc resources, folloHnng appropriate CEQA gwdehnes C, F, C~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-41 SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 6 • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bemardmo County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct apre-construction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submd a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarcling further mitigation measures (i e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must inctude, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. 3) Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bemardmo County Museum Geo/ogic and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daffy to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-sde Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Pnorto issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submdto Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan C-J ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-41 SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 7 (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entenng the storm dram system to the maxmum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing actiwties are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the follovwng measures at a mirnmum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to mirnmize sod exposure to rainy penods expenenced in southern Cal~fomia, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this project wdl be corrected through a remediation or restoration program Hnthin a specified time frame. 3) Dunng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) Dunng construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed pnor to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WaterQualAy Management Plan prepared by MDS Consulting (March 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entenng the storm drain system to the maxmum extent prectical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including momtonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submiried to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits 7) Prior to issuance of budding permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer far approval of a WQMP, incuding a project description and identifying BMPs that wdl be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistentwdh the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Nonce of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storrn Water Permit from the State Water Resources - C, ~ ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-41 SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 8 Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copyofthe Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Pennd Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8.00 p m and 6 30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any Ume on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as speufied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Momtonng at other times may be regwred by the Bulding Offical Said consultant shall report their findings to the Budding OffiGal within 24 hours, however, rf noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Budding Offical. If nose levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The penmeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 4) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p m and 6.30 a.m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THiS 25TH DAY OF MAY 2005. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Rich MaGas, Chainnan ATTEST Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-41 SUBTPM17156 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP May 25, 2005 Page 9 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of May 2005, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES' COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS. CJ ~, ~-aR City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2005-00107, DRC2005-00220 General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106, Development District Amendment Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17156, and Development Review This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to prowde focused, yet flewble guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The protect planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and rewews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation Hnll be kept in the protect file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • G~ F, Cr ~~od Mitigation Monitonng Program GPA DRC2005-00106, DDA DRC2005-00107, SUBTPM17156, and DR DRC2005-00220 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate wntten approvals to the protect planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Fonn. After each measure is venfied for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitonng will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6 Unanticipated circumstances may anse requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form v~nll be completed by the project planneror responsible Cdydepartment and a copy provided to the appropnate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authonty to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occumng afterwntten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the • authonty to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occumng. The project planner or responsible City department has the authonty to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitonng after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall requre the applicant to post any necessary funds (or otherforms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required penod of time. 9. In those instances requinng long-tens project monitonng, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitonng the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitonng results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitonng/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner pnor to the issuance of bwlding permits. E~F,Cr-l01 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.'s: General Plan Amendment DRC2005-00106• Develo merit District Amendment DRC2005-00107• Tentative Parcel Mao SUBTP17156• and Tentative Tract Mao SUBTT17455 Applicant: Rancho Cucamonga Housing Partners LP Initial Study Prepared by: Michael Diaz Date: April 13. 2005 . , ~ .. .- { - ~ ~'?~i ?~~'u v! ., •* ro ~ ` t <, All construction equipment shall be maintain d ~ q ~~ta + d; Ky~ ;t,.-_s 3+x L r..~ . c *$`~x 3a'.~''" "~ F ?N o.i13r~ `?. ~ aSid` lrra-r+,+ & d $l' n "i, tv _ ~€." ~D. - " ^W `~ ~3i1~"k~.,- ~k~Y ~~ux4 r "~t , ~ Y ~ :''3u i," ~'~% . ~F ~'v'~irz U~. ~~.. rv-~'9 e in good operating condition so as to reduce operational CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2/q emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification Prior to the issuance f o any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the Cit CP/BO C Rewew of plans C 2 y denoting the proposed schedule and pro/ected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction egwpment wdl be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed CP C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 All construction egwpment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions 1 of~ ~It (~ ,. .~ ~. ., . ~. .. • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site th BO C Revew of plans A/C yq rough seeding and watering • Pave or appl ravel t y g o any on-site haul roads BO C R f eview o plans A/C 2/q • Phase gradin to r t th g p even e susceptibility of large BO C R areas to erosion over extended periods of time eview of plans AIC yq • Schedule actiwties to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of BO C Review of plans AIC 2/q work periods • Dispose of sur lu p s excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound BO C Review of plans A q engineering practices • Sweep streets accord t ing o a schedule established BO C D by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public uring A q thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling construction Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance vnth construction SCAQMD Rule 403 regwrements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During q q haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilmng agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional construction Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) datly to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans AIC 4 altematNe fuel powered equipment where feasible 2of8 ~)1 O -~ .. .~ -, The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that BO C Rewew of plans AIC 2/4 work crews wtll shut off egwpment when not in use All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C yq required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting healing, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters All residential and comm l ercia structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C p/q required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources ~ .. If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer vnll retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undes~gnated CP/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require CP/BO C Rewew of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using then speaal qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's CP/BO C Rewew of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend CP/BO C Rewew of report AID 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines 3 of~ `n .. .. ., . -. ~. • Prepare a technical resources management report, CP C Review of report p/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with , original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving A qualified paleontolo ist h ll CP g s a conduct a preconstruction B R AID field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall eview of report 4 submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mdigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and CP B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with mammal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared ~ B/C Review of report AID 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho CP D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to the San Bemardino County Museum GeDl0gyand SOlis - ~~' _ ~ ~ ;: _'~-~,~ ;~,~-'„G,%E w;i. ~,~~ ~*~ • ~ ~~n .m s. •t ~~ ~ . Mn~ ,~ ~ ,a ~ a~ a . c+~ . The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO C During A 4 stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) construction daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 4of8 lf' _Ti ,. ... .. ~, .. . , Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C Dunng A speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions construction q from the site dunng such episodes Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO C RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction Dunng q q areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and WaterOuallty ~ " ' ~W >'~~~'" e~ J.. '. u rc :,,~ '°~Sr °E ~ i ~ ~~~~~~'~i^'~~';~"~ ae~k' 3 t ~ d' `" / ~ s~,~{ 8 ~F ~a~~;.{,+~~~r;~; ,_,.~= ~ ~ ~ =, ~t Prior to issuance of grading permits the permit ap licant . . .y BO ~ + erv B/C/ t.~7 : }- a* C #' Jd' k.Y~± 2~5'4 ~ xa'~ .~ a ~ ~~~ , p shall submit to Building Offiaal for approval, Storm D Review of plans A/C Z4 Water Pollution Prevention Pian (SWPPP) speaficaliy identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants dunng construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C Z4 the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies speafic measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing actvites are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafythe timing of grading and construction to mwmize sod exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be ~ corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a speafied time frame 5 of~ ~~ . , . .. , • ... ., , Durng construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent BO -. ~ B/C/D Review of plans AIC ... yq , discharge of debns or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff During construction to remove ll t , po u ants, street cleaning will be pertormed prior to stor BO BIC/D Review of plans AIC yq m events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debns or sediment from the site The developer shall implement th BMP e s identified in CE B/C/D R the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared eview of plans AIC 2/q by MDS Consulting (March 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm dram system to the maximum extent practical Landscaping plans shall incl d u e provisions for controlling and minimizing the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/q use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including momtonng provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval pnor to the issuance of grading permits Prior to issuance of budding permts, the applicant shall CE B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/q submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including apro/ect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Gwdelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 6of8 n ,. . ~. ~. Prior to issuance of grading or pawng permits, applicant BO B/C/D Rewew of plans A/C 2/4 shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Bwiding Offical for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permd rr ..~ r ~ LL^ s <'i.. ` Noise ~ - ,. w ,. ..: _ `~ _ ~s~~;~,~z ~,.f, r~, i M1i ;_rt 3-k~ si_ ~ ~^~.y~C ~~; tµ..4 iY'=d'~i'..xiN~~~ it`; kA ` ~ ~x ~~e 3S. ~ ~.ag.`°a-r~'" ~ i ~tf' ~ ' `~ ,'.y~ ~1v1.*.:A: i' 'h~,;6P+~try'ri `k" v t~ ~,',P ~ ~' ~~` a Y x~°a,~"-i6.J' ;~+;'yi - " w " + _~~F '3n'~= .,i " v ' Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO .n a ^r~" ~ , ? ia ~ ~ ~Sd ,~.e y"§`..~`3 .34x en 'Y:;. 3~~tT 1 ;«~ i z~dC,`4 . - a? hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, C During construction A 4 including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During q 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to pertorm weekly noise level monitoring as speafied in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Budding Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Bwlding Official vnthm 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Department If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early CP C During A A as possible in the first phase construction 7 of~ • Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings C Dunng I A construction 4/7 ~. Key to Checklist Abbreviations \' 1 ` \I Responsible Person ~ ~ CDD -Community Development Dvector or designee Monitorin Pre uenc 9 q y,- - " A -With E h N `z"~%<:'-o u'; ~ Method~ofVerificatlon~~.~~y~;w~~ ~A~~; _w ,Sa_nctions _ ~ ~~ - CP -City Planner or designee ac ew Development B - Pnor T C t A - On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CE -City Engineer or designee o ons ruction C -Th h t C B -Other Agency Permit /Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Bwlding Permit roug ou onstruction C -Plan Check 3 W thh l BO -Building Official or designee PO -Police Captain or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) - i o d Certificete of Occupancy 4 -Stop Work Order FC -Fire Chief or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain De posit or Bonds 6 -Revoke CUP 7 - CiTatlon 8of8 ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17156 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 12 8 ACRES OF LAND APPLICANT: RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOUSING PARTNERS, LP LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND MADRONE AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the altematrve, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorneys fees which the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 05-41, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map Is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval C. Site Development 1 Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Clty Planner 2 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first Com IeUon Da / / / / / / / / -/-/~ G--,'~ Gr' I [-o Prolecl No SUBTPM17166 Comole6on Date 3 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _I_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Speafic Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 4 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _I_/_ lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, speaal street posting, phone listing forcommunityconcems, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fenang APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) D. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (I e , DRC2001-00001) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for avadabdity of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Construction actrnty shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday /_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays E. Grading 1 Grading of the sub)ect property shall be in accordance with Califoma Bulding Cade, City Grading _/ /_ Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A sods report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/ /_ 2 Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/ noted on the final map G. Street Improvements 1 Improvement Plans and Construction a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights /_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civll Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bwiding permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a dd t t Off ' _/_/ i ion o any s ice in a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer other permits required Project No SUBTPM17156 ComoleGOn Date T c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal condut, and _/_l~ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with anynew construction or reconstruction _!_/_ protect along motor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise speafied by the City Engineer 2) Conduct shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as speafied e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on ail corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requrnng construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are regwred A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be _/_/_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner pnor to submittal for first plan check _/ /_ Improvement Completion 1 If the regwred public improvements are not completed pnor to approval of the final parcel map, _/ / an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City ~ will be regwred for 9th Street frontaoe improvements along Parcel 3 2 If the regwred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _/_/_ an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, staling that they will be completed upon development for a Parcel 1 development shall be responsible for 9th Street improvements along the frontage of Parcels 1 and 2, and installation of or provide fair share contribution in lieu of constriction for the 9th Street storm dram b Parcel 2 development shall be responsible for Madrone Avenue improvements along the property frontage c Parcel 3 redevelopment shall be responsible for Madrone Avenue improvements along the property frontage Utilities 1 Provide separate uhltty services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/ electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) to accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as regwred 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is regwred pnor to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days pnor to final map approval in the case of subdrnsion or pnor to the issuance of permits rn the case of all other residential pro/ects G, ~ 6---! ~a- Prgect No SUBTPM17156 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies tnvolved . Approval of the final parcel map will be subfect to any requirements that may be received from them. J. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Ctty, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or pnor to building permit issuance if no map is tnvolved r1 LJ • Completion Date ~~_ ~~ Neighborhood Meeting Summary- 9"' and Madrone Public noticed meetings. To date we have had a total of 3 public meetings and a pnvate meeting vwth a select group We have also held a number of meetings with influential area residents as listed below The first 2 public meetings were by way of public notice to all property owners within the regwred 300-foot radws Public meeting # 3 was addressed to residents vmthin a 600' foot radws. The expansion of this area was at the request of the Planning Department Follow up meetings were at the request of the local groups that invrfed us back to speak to their group on specrfic topics All public noticed meetings took place at the Cask N Cleaver restaurant R Stan Smdh, Vice President of Related, Steve Brain and Josh LaBarge of Southern Calrfomia Housing Resource and Development, and Flavio Nunez of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency attended these meetings All meetings have focused on disclosing the affordable housing component, on presenting the plans and designs and on receiving feedback from and trying to involve the neighbors in the design process Meeting # 1- 5/5/2004 -Public notice sent to a 300'rad~us This was attended by approximately 14 neighbors, composed of the Rancho Heights Condo Assoc and other neighbors from west on 9'" Street. Initial concept and design was discussed along with a range of affordability issues. The meeting lasted approximately 90 minutes As a cart of this meeting, we also presented the protect in a pnvate meeting to the HOA board. Approximately 20 people were present Meeting # 2 - 6/17/2004 - Publrc notice sent to a 300'radms Approximately 7 neighbors attended this meeting Some had follow up questions on affordable housing Others wanted to raise questions regarding the parking on site and whether it would have an impact on the surrounding neighborhood We explained that we were over parking the srfe and that we felt with the addrfional parking that offsrfe parking would be at a minimum We also addressed our management and detailed tenant screening process to respond to the neighbors questions regarding the quality of the affordable tenants We stressed the quality of our work and informed the neighbors about our background and awards (as we have in all meetings) As a follow up to this meeting, we were invited to the home of Mr John Lang (meeting # 4) John is the Rancho Heights HOA board president. He felt d would be better to meet wrth his board separately and discuss the same basic issues that were discussed at the June 17"' meeting. Once again, parking and secunty were the main topics on the table There were issues raised as to fenang and what the cdy could do on the park site to make sure ~ was fenced and did not attract any trash or vandalism We assured the board that we would follow through with the city to make sure they fenced the vacant site in a safe manner Meeting # 3 - 5/12/2005 - Public nonce sent to a 600' radius This meeting was attended by approximately 11 neighbors from the surrounding area We also attracted a few developers that were at the meeting stnctly to find out where we stood in the city process Their experience was lacking and they were there mostly to acgwre information on how to further develop their own sites We also were approached by a mortgage broker who was interested in providing finanung for the sale of the units When it came to the actual neighbors, we were once again involved with issues regarding parking and access We felt pressure from some who felt that even though we had ~r6 doubled the amount of site parking from the sty's regwrement, that d was still not enough There's not much we can do about this situation, which we explained is why we feR we had already go above and beyond the basic concept. We also dealt with questions on affordable housing and cleanng up the difference between County Section 8 Housing and the City requirements for residents that moll move in Most were surprised to know that all people Irving in the city owned unds must be employed to meet the affordabtlity requirements Some assumed d would be all Section 8 housing Flavio spoke on the subject and all present seemed satisfied with his response Overall the response at each meeting has been very oositrve In particular three ladies representing the San Jacinto Condo Complex condo complex have attended all three of these meetings and are supportroe of the project. We believe that we have met and addressed all concems raised in these meetings and have incorporated all of the neighbors input into the design of our project. In summary, the ma~onty of the concems raised by the neighbors have been • Describing the difference in the affordable housing that we moll be providing and other types of affordable housing (and that our housing wdl be available as a priority to local workers). • Addressing security and management concems (explaining the eviction process for bad residents and the tenant screening process that we use to make sure we do not get bad tenants) • Secunrtg the open space site (to mitigate concems over weed, dust, trash and erosion control of the open space, and eliminating the ability for trucks to park on the vagnt property and wake up neighbors at night) • Providing suffiaent on site guest parking so that the street parking is not an issue Overall there was a strong preference in seeing the site rezoned and developed as a residential project versus an industrial project under the current zoning. We believe we have presented a beautrful and qualdy project that the neighbors see as a benefit to the neighborhood. The potential for the open space to become a park was an added benefd and we believe the sooner this can happen the better for the neighbors Other Private Meetings • Nacho Grata from Northtown Housing • Pamela Wright -Cucamonga School District • Sheri B~scotti -Los Amigos Elementary School PnnGpal (nearby school) • Chuck Kagle -Owner, Cask N Cleaver Restaurant • _ R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ENGINEERING Staff Report DEPARTMENT DATE May 25, 2005 Tp: Chairman and Members of the Plannin~~ng~~~,,,ppQCommission FROM; Jerry A Dyer, Senior Crod Engineer I,Y,t' SUBJECT: ENGINEERING DIVISION CAPITAL/IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Attached is the Engineering Division's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Yeaz 2005/06 The protects have been categorized by type of protect (Beautification, Drainage, Facilities, etc ), which are m alphabetical order within a category A map showing the protect locations is also attached A summary of project costs by category is shown on the cover page. The total for al] protects is a tittle under $72,000,000. This item has been reviewed and approved by the City Council Public Works Subcommittee. RECONII~~NDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find the Capital Improvement Program in conformance with the General Plan Respectfully submitted, ~~~ %. ~~t Jerry A Dyer Senior Civil Engineer Attachments. FY 2005/06 Capital Improvement Program Protect Location Map Item "H" a • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 SUMMARY Beautlflcatlon $ 1,800,000 Drainage $ 8,281,000 Facllltles $ 500,000 Miscellaneous $ s,2zs,sao Munlclpal Utlllty $ 675,000 Parks $ a,ass,ooo Railroad Crossings $ 18,696,000 Streets $ 27,sas,s7o Studies $ 8,000 Traffic $ 2,aso,ooo TOTAL $ 71,881,210 COMMENTS The protects are listed in alphabetical order within each category, except for numbered streets which are in numerical order at the beginning of a section If the account number contains an "x", a final tob ledger number has not been assigned as yet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 No Protect Beautification 1 19th Street -West City Limits to Camelian -Landscape Parkway (Design Survey/Design, Construct FY06/07) 2 Fisher Dr -East Ave to the east -Landscape north parkway (Design and Construct) Approx 94k reimbursable from Caltrans 3 Highland Av -Beryl St to Hermosa Av -Landscape south parkway (Design and Construct) 4 Wilson Avenue -Carnelian St to Beryl St -Landscape parkways, trail improvement and street lights (Design and Construct) Drainage 5 Beryl St - N/O 210 Frwy to N/O Banyan -Install Master Plan Storm Drain (Design Survey/Design, Construct FY06/07) 6 Foothill Blvd - Etiwanda to the east (approx 1000') -Install Master Plan Storm Drain (Design and Construct) 7 Foothill Blvd -Ramona to Hermosa -Install Master Plan Storm Drain (Design and Construct) 8 Hellman Avenue (Cucamonga SD) -Install Master Plan Storm Drain Fund Account Amount ($) Beautification 11103165650/1522-110 10,000 Beautification 11103165650/1366-110 150,000 Dev Trust 18820002314 100.000 250,000 Beautification 11103165650/1335-110 500,000 Park Development 11203055650/1335-120 890.000 1,390,000 Beautification 11103165650/1364-110 200,000 Transportation 11243035650/1364-124 50.000 250,000 Beautification Total 1,900,000 General Drainage 11123035650/1505-112 15,000 Lower Etiw Drainage 11263035650/1523-126 750,000 General 10013075650/1506-001 1,000,000 General Drainage 11123035650/1390-112 356,000 Measure I 11763035650/1390-176 2,144,000 RDA 2004 TAB 26608015650/1390-660 1,996,000 4,496,000 Drainage Total 6,261,000 Page 1 of 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM -FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 No Protect Fund Account Facilities 9 Household Hazardous Waste -Building/Site Relocation Miscellaneous 10 ADA Ramps and Driveways at various locations (Design and Construct) 11 Banyan Street -Sapphire to Carnelian -Equestrian Trail Improvement (Design Survey/Design, Construct FY06/07) 12 Beryl Street -Banyan to Wilson -Equestrian Trail Improvement (Design and Construct) 13 Bus Pads/Bays at Mator Arterial Streets 14 CNG Site Design -Fueling Pods at Yard at for clean natural gas/alternative fuel vehicles 15 Cucamonga Creek -Foothill to Base Line - Class I Bikeway (Design and Construct) Reimbursable BTA funds 16 Developer Reimbursements -Reimburse funds to Developers for construction of City Master planned transportation, drainage, and park faalities Integ Waste Mgmt 11883035650/1525-188 Faalities Total n U Amount (S) 500,000 500,000 Measure I 11763035650/1150-176 100,000 CDBG 12043145650/1017-204 4 970 104,970 Beautification 11103165650/1502-110 10,000 Beautification 11103165650/1503-110 140,000 A82766 Air Quality 11053035650/1521-105 70,000 Transportation 11243035650/1521-124 5000 75,000 Capital Reserve 10253035650/1421-025 150,000 Beautifcation 11103165650/xxxx-110 44,000 Beautification 11103165650/1026-110 550,000 Drainage General City 11123035650/1026-112 1,076,630 Etiwanda 11163035650/1026-116 170,240 Transportation 11243035650/1026-124 1.000,000 2,796,870 17 Haven Avenue -Base Line to 19th St -Landscape West Parkway (Design Survey/Design, Construct FY06/07) Beautifcation 11103165650/1504-110 10,000 Page 2 of 7 • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 No Protect Fund Account 18 Highland Avenue -Milliken to Rochester along Rte 210 -Plant Trees Beautification 11103165650/1483-110 19 Pacific Electric Railroad -Archibald to Haven -Trail Improvement Beautifcation 11103165650/1519-110 (Design and Construct) Reimbursable Ped Grant Article 3 funds Ped Grant Art 3 12143035650/1519-214 20 Pacific Electric Railroad -Haven to east of Etiwanda -Trail Improvement (Design and Construct) Beauhficahon TEA 21 11103165650/1453-110 12083035650/1453-208 Municipal Utility 21 Foothill and Rochester Northeast corner -Provide electrical service 22 Substation - Hardscape and landscape improvement 23 Victoria Gardens Mall -East side line extension Municipal Utility Municipal Utility Municipal Uhhty Miscellaneous Total 17053035650/1518-705 17053035650/1490-705 17053035650/1486-705 Municipal Utility Total C~ Amount (S) 35,000 100,000 1.000.000 1,100,000 434,000 3.779.000 4,213,000 9,228,840 250,000 75,000 350,000 675,000 Page 3 of 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 No Protect Fund Account Parks 24 Beryl Park east and west -Replace antiquated light fixtures at both parks 25 Central Park Development LMD #1/General City Park Development Park Development Park Development Park Development Park Development 11303035650/1484-130 11203055650/1343-120 11203055650/1321-120 11203055650/1452-120 11203055650/1312-120 11203055650/1499-120 Amount ($) 40,000 500,000 54,000 650,000 500,000 12,000 10,000 1, 500,000 1,200,000 4,466,000 26 Hentage Park -Repair 5 Equestrian/Pedestrian Bndges 27 Los Osos High School -Install field lighting (6 fields) -Construct 28 NAPA Soccer Field Development - (Design and Construct) 29 Red Hill Park - Pedrestrian Improvement -NEC of Park Construct Path and ADA Ramp (Design and Construct) 30 Red Hill Park -Soccer Field Rehabilitation and Renovation 31 South Etiwanda Park - N/O Fcothill BI E/O Etiwanda Av -Construct new 5 acre park (Design and construct) 32 Various Parks -Rehabilitate various items (Design and Construct) Railroad Crossings 33 6th St - W/O RxR Spur to Etiwanda Av -Complete Street with widening and Upgrade Spur crossing (Design and Construct) 34 Haven Ave -Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks (Complete Design/R/W Acquisition and Start Construction) Park Development 11203055650/1244-120 Park Development 11203055650/1313-120 Park Development 11203055650/1059-120 Parks Total Transportaticn 11243035650/1405-124 RDA -TAB 2001 26508015650/1355-650 RDA -TAB 2004 26608015650/1355-660 Railroad Crossings Totaf 696,000 1, 500,000 16.500,000 18,000,000 18,696,000 Page 4 of 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 No Protect Fund Account Amount ($) Streets 35 Archibald Ave - 19th to Banyan -Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11763035650/1516-176 300,000 (Design and Construct) 36 Arrow Rte -west of Etiwanda to east City limits -Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11763035650/1372-176 10,000 (Design Survey/Design, Construct FY06/07) 37 Banyan St -Sapphire to Carnelian -Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11763035650/1517-176 10,000 (Design Survey/Design, Construct FY06/07) 38 Base Line Rd -Carnelian to Lion -Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11763035650/1468-176 290,000 (Design and Construct) 39 Base Line Rd -Haven Ave to Deer Crk Channel -Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11763035650/1469-176 266,000 (Design and Construct) 40 Base Line Rd -west City limit to Carnelian -Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11763035650/1374-176 300,000 (Design and Construct) 41 Base Line Rd and I-15 Interchange Improvement - EIR and R/W Transportation 11243035650/1361-124 200,000 RDA 2004 TAB 26608015650/1361-660 3.500,000 3,700,000 42 Base Line Rd at I-15 -widen 2 lanes SB 8 NB on ramps Transportation 11243035650/1511-124 100,000 (Design Survey/Design, Construct FY06/07) 43 Beryl St - Cielito St to 19th St -Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11763035650/1295-176 95,000 (Design and Construct) 44 Church St -Archibald Ave to Hermosa Ave -Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11763035650/1470-176 300,000 (Design and Construct) See also No 54 Traffic 45 Etiwanda Ave - 6th St to Arrow -Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation Transportation 11243035650/1076-124 505,000 (Design and Construct) Page 5 of 7 • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM -FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 No Protect Fund Account 46 Foothill Blvd -Grove Ave to Vineyard Ave -Widening and Bridge RDA 2001 TAB 26508015650/1189-650 Improvement (Complete Design/R/W Acquisition and Start Construction RDA 2004 TAB 26608015650/1189-660 RDA 2004 TAB 26608015650/1189-660 Transportation 11243035650/1189-124 47 Foothill Blvd at I-15 -widen SB & NB on ramps and SB off ramp (Design Survey/Design, Construct FY06/07) 48 Highland Ave -Haven to Milliken -EIR to re-open street 49 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various locations, including Northtown Area (Design and construct) 50 Milliken Ave - 4th St to 6th St -Street widening and Pavement Rehab (Design and Construct) C~ Amount ($) 12,000,000 2,500,000 5,000,000 5 000 19,505,000 Transportation 11243035650/1513-124 200,000 Transportation 11243035650/1514-124 50,000 Gas Tax /Prop 111 11703035650/1022-170 208,000 Measure I 11763035650/1022-176 592,000 Transportation 11243035650/1022-124 376,270 CDBG 12043145650/1527-204 278.100 1,454,370 Transportation 11243035650/1467-124 234,000 AD 82-1 16003035650/1467-600 170.000 404,000 51 Wilson Ave -East to Wardman Bullock -EIR and Conceptual Design Studies 52 Pavement Management Program Transportation 11243035650/1515-124 200,000 Streets Total 27,689,370 Gas Tax /Prop 111 11703035650/1020-170 5,000 Studies Total 5,000 Page 6 of 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 No Protect Fund Account Amount ($) Traffic 53 19th St -Install new traffic controllers Transportation 11243035650/1491-124 220,000 54 Church St -Archibald Ave to Haven Ave -Pavement Re-striping Transportation 112430356501476-124 25,000 See also No 44 Streets 55 Foothill Blvd -Install new traffic controllers Transportation 11243035650/1492-124 400,000 56 Foothill Blvd at Hellman Ave -Install Lek Turn Arrow Transportation 112430356501475-124 50,000 57 Opticom Emergency Vehicle Detection System -Install on remaining Capital Reserve 10253035650/1507-025 700,000 signals in City (approximately 107) 58 Rehabilitate traffic signal internally illuminated street name signs Transportation 11243035650/1251-124 20,000 (Design and construct) 59 Signal - 6th St at Buffalo St -Install traffic signal Transportation 11243035650/1473-124 200,000 60 Signal -Archibald at Banyan -Install traffic signal Transportation 11243035650/1509-124 200,000 61 Signal -Archibald at Victoria -Install traffic signal Transportation 11243035650/1510-124 200,000 62 Signal -Arrow at Etiwanda -Modify traffic signal Measure I 11763035650/1508-176 100,000 63 Signal -Base Line at Hellman -Modify traffic signal Transportation 11243035650/1512-124 25,000 64 Signal -Carnelian St at Wilson Ave -Install traffic signal Transportation 11243035650/1474-124 200,000 65 Solar Speed Detector Signs -Install stationary flashing speed warning signs Capital Reserve 10253035650/1530-025 120,000 Traffic Total 2,460,000 Page 7 of 7 2004 DESIGN AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE POTENTIAL NOMINATIONS H Only projects completed m Calendar Year 2004 are eligible c • ~:„~ Tour Map# . •- DRC2001-00346 Forest City Various Victoria Gardens YES YES YES YES YES YES DRC2002-00839 O&S Holdings South Side of Foothill near Foothill Crossing YES YES NO Da Creek DRC2oo3-00617 Regency N/VJ Corner of Foothill and Victoria Gateway YES YES NO Da creek DRC2oo3-00076 FuscoeEngineering 117504th Wickes YES NO DRC2002-00606 Panatonni Development West Side of Hermosa and Industrial Bulding North of 6th (N of G M YES YES YES YES Butldm DRC2oo3-00330 Edward Olmedo S/W Corner of Milliken and Office Building YES YES YES YES 6th DRC2oo3-00124 U S Home N/W Corner Daycreek and SFR -Victoria YES YES NO Church Arbors DRC2oo3-00188 Standard Pacific N/E Corner Daycreek and SFR - Victoria YES YES YES YES Church Arbors DRC2oo3-00189 Standard Paafic N/W Corner Arbor Lane SFR -Victoria YES YES YES YES YES and Church Arbors DRC2oo3-001st U S Home West Side Arbor Lane and SFR -Victoria YES YES YES YES North of Church Arbors DRC2oo3-00192 U S Home West Side of Victoria Park SFR -Victoria Lane and North of the Arbors YES YES YES YES Arbor Lane Terminus DRC2oo3-00241 Standard Pacific S/E Corner of Day Creek SFR -Victoria YES YES YES YES YES and Madn al Drrve Arbors DRC2oo3-0242 Standard Paafic East of Day Creek and SFR -Victoria North of Church Street Arbors YES YES YES YES Duectl Behind Wme DRC2004-0279 Etiwanda Arbors N/W Corner of E6wanda SFR -Victoria Avenue and Church Street Arbors YES YES NO DRCZOOZ-oossa Toll Brothers E/s Etiwanda, S/c 210 Fwy sFR YES YES YES YES YES American Beauty Arbor Lane ' Landscape, pedestrian YES YES YES YES orientation ' Arbor Lane is the street that is the central design feature of Arbors Village connecting from the park at the heart of the Village to Victoria Gardnes i \PLANNING\Design Award Filest2004\NOminated Low6ons-Tally 2004 xls 6/1/2005 PC ITEM: A PC Item: D DRC2004-00794 Emily SUBTPM16445 Eddie Rowland Mark Capelhno 12876 Craig Dnve 2020 Del Amo Boulevard, Swte 105 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Torrance, CA 90501 Guy Gardner 1815E Cortez Street, #226 2 copies to the above West Covina, CA 91791 PC Item: E DRC2005-00106 Mike D. PC Item: B The Related Companies•of Calfornia DRC2004-00567 18201 von b~arman Avenue, Swte 900 Emily Innn ja•92612 Steve Wu 420 S Pine Street 2 copies to the above San Gabnel, CA 91776 PC Item: C PC ITEM:'F 8 G DRC2005-00315 DRC2005-00106/DRC2005- Tom 00107/SUBTPM17156 Amy Harrell Johnson Family Trust Granite Homes 26443 Weston Dnve 2 Park Plaza, Swte 700 Los Altos Hills, CA 90422-1929 Irvine, CA 92614 Melinda Colgrove The Related Companies of California Etrvvanda School Distnct 18201 Von Karman Avenue, Sude 900 6061 East Avenue Innne, CA 92612 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 CP Item: DRC2005-00148 Rosalynne Point of Grace Church 8429 While Oak Avenue, SuRe 102 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Calwest Industnal Properties P O Box 4900 Scottsdale, AZ 85261-4900 PC: May 25, 2005 HPC Workshop: None CP: May 24, 2005 Planning Commission Meeting of ~/~'/~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and aty and indicate the item you have spoken regarding. Thank you 1, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM ~~~~ ~ ( 0~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~'~ Wawa ~ ~ 1~, C. Midi ~l-i~Pr=1GrV~ ZoZo Dil i~i~ dz~v r#rDr Ta~z~~,~./c,_ L; ~ ~~