Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1983/04/06 - Agenda PacketGVCAMO v� �7 • � / O r O F Z U > 1977 QTY OF RAWW CU AM WA CITY COUNCIL AGENEA Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California April 6, 1983 - 7:30 p.m. All item submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these item is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such item. 1. CALL TO ORDER • A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Buquet_, Dahl_, Frost_ Schlosser_, and Mikels_ C. Approval of Minutes: February 16, 1983 and March 14, 1983. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Thursday, April 7, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. b. Monday, April 11, 7:00 P.M. - SPECIAL COURCIL MEETING FOR ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN HEARING - Lions Park Community Center. c. Proclamation designating the week of April 10 -17, 1983 as Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR %.,�:; t: c•roI �- (i The following Consent Calendar item are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without diwussion. - City Council Agenda 2 April 6, 1983 a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83 -03 -31 and Payroll 1 ending 83 -03 -20 in the amount of ;116,324.02 and Warrants Register No. 83-04 -06 in the amount of $259,984.71. b. Approval of Warrants, Assessment District 82 -1 for 5 February 1983 in the amount of $1,136,421.95. e. Request authorization for Community Services Director to 6 attend the League of Cities Community Services Conference, Fresno and the National Recreation A Park Association Revenue Management Institute in San Diego. Requested expenditures are from within the Community Services Department budget. d. Release of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien 7 Agreement requested by Thomas and Barbara Trombatore for completion of improvements at 6881 Amethyst Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -38 ll A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A • REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM THOMAS AND BARBARA TROMBATORE. e. Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Security for 12 6123 Amethyst Avenue submitted by Harley and Leah Lovitt. RESOLUTION NO. 83-39 17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 6123 AMETHYST AVENUE. f. Acceptance of Street Improvement Agreement and Security is for CUP 82 -01 submitted by Etiwanda Investment Company (Pic -N- Save). RESOLUTION NO. 83 -40 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR CUP 82 -01. �g. Approval of Subordination Agreement for 6557 Mulberry 29 Avenue submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Mclnturf. City Council Agenda 3 April 6, 1983 • RESOLUTION N0. 83 -41 34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM MR. AND MRS. MCINTURF AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. h. Set Public Hearing - April 20, 1983 - Environmental Assessment and Planned Development 83 -02 (Tentative Tract 12362) - Rancho Center. A change of zone from R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) and the development of 88 units arranged as four- plezes on 6.4 acres located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman APN 208- 011-02, 04, 71. i. Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue Cooperative 35 Agreement with CalTrans. Recommend approval of agreement with CalTrans for cooperative funding of intersection widening at Foothill and Hellman. CalTrans contribution $25,000. Also cover City share of $15,000 for guardrails at Turner and Foothill. • J. Staff request for payment of claim from Gordon and Edena 48 Myers. k. Acceptance of Agreement, Security, and Final Map for 59 Tract 11734 submitted by American National Group located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue. RESOLUTION N0. 83 -42 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 11734. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 75 3 -02 - SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT An amendment to Section 61.0217 of the Zoning Ordinance to include an overlay district containing various development incentives to produce senior citizen oriented multi- family housing, as well as site development and general overlay district location criteria. For consideration and Council consideration, continued from the March 2nd Is meeting. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. City Council Agenda 4 April 6, 1983 ORDINANCE NO. 193 (first reading) 100 �- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0217 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE CREATING A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -43 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT - ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAIT AMENDMENT 83- 128 03 - CALMARE. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from medium -high residential (14 -24 dwelling - units /acre) to high residential (24 -30 dwelling units /acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of land located west of Archibald, and north of Base Line - APN '. 202 - 151 -34. (Related file: PD 83-01)• Item continued from the March 2, 1983 meeting. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. • RESOLUTION NO. 83-26 150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY - OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ' ADOPTED LAND USE PLAN OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN. -, C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83 -01 151 (PARCEL MAP 7827) - CALMAR[. A change of zone from R -3 (multiple - family residential /planned development) to R- 3 /SO (multiple family residential /senior overlay) and the development of 269 apartment units, of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres generally located west of Archibald, north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 - APN 202 - 151 -34. (Related file: GPA 83 -03). Item continued from the March 2, 1983 meeting. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. ORDINANCE NO. 201 (first reading) 201 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 151 -34, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL _ 1 OR PARCEL MAP 7827 AND LOCATED WEST OF ARCHIBALD, NORTH OF BASE LINE FROM R -3 /PD TO R -3 /SO. x City Council Agenda 5 • D. VACATION OF A PORTION OF 7tH STREET. Vacation of a portion of 7th Street adjacent to California Finished Metals located on the southeast corner of 7th Street and Center Avenue. Item continued from March 16, 1983. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF 7TH STREET. E. ORDERING ANNEXATION 140. 12 FOR TRACT 10045 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 83-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT NO. 10045. . F. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM: STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES /PROGRAM FUNDING. In order for the City to receive funding under the CDBG Program, the Federal Department of Housing and Community Development requires that the City publish, distribute and bold a public hearing on its intended program. Staff report by Rick Marks, Associate Planner. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING A STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES AND PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. April 6, 1983 202 208 210 214 5 217 235 h.L. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 236 8383 =01. An amendment to Chapter 1, Section 1.08.160 A 1.08.170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding home occupation permits. Staff Report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. ORDINANCE NO. 199 • -. 243 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING SECTIONS 1.08.160 AND 1.08.170 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS. S 0 City Council Agenda 6 5. ORDINANCES FOR CONSIDERATION A. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAE. An ordinance proposing a transient occupancy tax for motels. Staff report by Harry Empey, Finance Director. ORDINANCE NO. 197 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 3.40 THERETO TO IMPOSE A TAX UPON THE PRIVILEGE OF TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY. B. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADMISSIONS TAX. An ordinance propsing an admissions tax for theaters and similar recreational activities. Staff report by Harry Empey, Finance Director. ORDINANCE NO. 198 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 3.36 THERETO TO IMPOSE AN ADMISSIONS TAX. C. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 4 AND 7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 87, CREATING AN ADVISORY COMMISSION. Proposed amendments to the ordinance will create a Chairman from the membership of the Advisory Commission to serve one year at the Commission's pleasure, and fix terms of new members of the Advisory Commission at two years. Staff report by Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager. ORDINANCE NO. 87 -A (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMAONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2.28.040 AND 2.28.070 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO TERMS OF APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS AND OFFICERS. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION OF WAIVER OF OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS. A request has been submitted to the City Council to consider the waiver of off -site improvements located on Sierra Vista Drive. Staff report by Lloyd Butts, City Engineer. April 6, 1983 246 248 254 259 263 285 City Council Agenda 7 April 6, 1983 B. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 303 301A. A request has been submitted by Raveewan c.l Kanokvechayant, M.D. to appeal a Planning Commission ''L lilv^a Y decision relating to General Plan Amendment 83 -01A. J Staff report by Rick Gomez. C. ALTA LOMA PARK RESTORATION STATUS REPORT. Presentation 315 of bids for seeding and improvement of Alta Loma Park and review of project budget. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. D. DISASTER REPAIR ALTERNATIVES ANALISIS FOR HELLMAN AVENUE 327 AND HERMO.SA AVENUES. Review of consultant's preliminary report on restoration and improvement of Hellman Avenue between San Bernardino Road and Palo Alto Street and Hermosa Avenue, south of 19th Street. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. E. DEVELOPMENT OF A CITY FINANCIAL PLAN. Council 347 discussion of the need for a city financial plan with direction to staff as to the type of plan desired. Staff report by Jack Lam. • CITI REPORTS T. ATTORNEY'S A. EMERGENCY ORDINANCE TO 114'OSE A MORATORIUM ON THE 354 ESTABLISHMENT OF ADULT BUSINESSES. Report presented by Bob Dougherty, City Attorney, ORDINANCE NO. 200 355 L AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 TO IMPOSE A MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ADULT BUSINESSES, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF SETTING A SPECIAL ADJOURNED 358 COUNCIL METING TO DISCUSS THE MELLO -R005 COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT IN RELATIONSHIP TO CREATING A PARK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. W] City Council Agenda 8 April 6, 1983 • B. CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION REGARDING 116DIAN 360 ISLANDS FOR THE CITY. Item was originally requested by Councilman Dahl at the March 16 city council meeting. Council requested that staff compile all city policies -relating to median islands and bring back to council for further discussion. C. STATUS REPORT ON FLOOD CONTROL. MEASURE N. 361 9. ADJOURNMENT Meeting to adjourn to special meeting on Monday, April 11, 1983 - Etiwanda Specific Plan Public Hearing. • RM5) flTy f.HO fll f. dYf14 f.1 MApp f VF. V F V O C R N A M E s 4:..n 4056 4. loll 9413 0415 5119 1313 o41n 1M1^' 9970 7 11. 7179 7179 n5 , Mf 45 ♦3c 31 ^t 11 7 I4 79 V^IO ID V.1 M V7 f� Y 'Iii NAR4ANT RECONCILL N NAATR pEFFPENCE JnU 3/31/83 DISCOUNT NET 430.00- 60.00 2.804.00 192.54 4.121.39 6.063.40 1.460.48 I. 500.00 25.00 660.00 5.327.50 10. it 3.70 6.572.53 2.0 1 218 3 914 216.00 - 6.00- 780.00- 780.00— V ^IO FINAL TOTALS 3/31/83 FINAL TOTALS 67.150.70 PIG. I M PU67 CITY OF PANCIMI CIICAYPNGA YARPANT RECONCILIATION 4/06/113 PAGE i NARR P VFN I V C N 0 0 A N A M E NARR .IOURNAt DISCOUNT NET DATE RIFERFNLE 1776, VO1N FrMVS ALICNMFNT 4/06153 I77A9 VAIN FLIOMt AI ILV °ENT 4/06/83 11110 VP In FnRMS AIICNMFVI 4/01.183 17711 Vfln Ffv ✓S At T"Mcmr 4/06/13 17772 OOP? A -AAPIF LPCK G KFY 4/06/gl 33.16 17771 0004 A -1 11NF71 4/06/A3 152.00 17774 f12s Ar TICI: IP.IVFL %CFNCY 4/0.6/P3 110.00 17775 OIf9 RtF111T1!R Al Comm 4 /n6/nl 161.25 17776 n211 AIRAF.FSF. PHILIP 4/06/83 31R-0 17777 P214 ALL AMCPICAN ASPHALT 4/06/R3 4.629.28 11771 0241 ALTA LfYA C4AMTF4 LINFS 4/01/83 IR5.00 17779 1755 ALIA ICVA P40IATrR 4/06/83 45.00 17780 0115 AM SIC PUOLIC AOV1N 4 /nA /P3 70.00 17781 O3 +N 69 PVOICCTINII IHn 4/06/03 346.50 17707 0415 APA CALIF CHAPTER 4/06/Pl 12.50 17193 9440 APPSIIF .I ASS C MIPPCP 4 10A/.3 60.83 17794 Cµ1 ASSIRI ATFC N.AP14n"NT IN 4/96 /9l 105.20 17785 DSBO AUOIP GFAPHIr SYSTFMS 4/n6/R3 679.23 17786 0615 n'VFPIY AUTHFLFT 4/06183 - 170.00 17787 l>nl 4W DC n ✓FPTCA 1T 6 SA 4 /Of /P3 332.36 I77A0 1295 LAPRrNi. KIM DARIFNF 4104/83 •2.500.00 177Pq 11.19 RASFLINF HAAnVAgF 4/06/13 166.86 17790 1110 RC.AR GULCH TIRE SERVICE 4/06/83 3.06 17791 1351 8FFnl F. TI✓ 4/06/83 70.00 11197 IlA1 99FLL F HPVRL 4/16/83 361.91 17793 1611 ITfT, PFGINA11 4/06/03 1.065.60 1719f 1615 PRAMf"A9 f. ASGOC. NICHA 4 /O6 /8l �' 2.160.00 17705 17784 176D I -fI On Uf SF NAV C. WITH CAL PFL RA 4/04 /0.3 4/06/03 560.70 50.00 Il TqT 1-10 CAPPO 4/05/13 25.00 I779R 1900 C r FNG7vrrQING 4/06/83 497.25 17799 1991 C11.1 wAlf.RffitS LAB INC 4/06/03 615.00 I?RlO 1141 rAL /Fnm,IA 3nuBPA1 4196/91 66.00 17R01 7n4l CALIF PARKS 6 Prf PEAIIO 4/n&/Ill 80.00 I7n02 11 )9 f.FVTBAL CIIIFS SIf.N SFR 4106/A3 3.670.96 17801 7178 CIIA ✓XFR CF CO!IIIFRCE 4116/93 929.30 17gn4 179, CY ='V 4/06103 20.34 17805 2115 CITY TY PPIITAL 4/06/83 916.06 178nl 2320 Cl AOFCrIA P:LUFPIN. CO 4/061.3 65.94 178n1 2135 Co" C.r1A nOTTLING 4106183 219.94 IT." 1335 C�CA CPLA ❑.TIT- CD 4/C6/83 52.00 17,0] 2551 SFRV C^LLCCV TvCn 4/06/83 Ir 320.00 170IO 257S WITTR LIIF.AYIVGA CN NATFR 01ST 4/05/11 11,11 2595 CHCAMONGA 4106/13 491.04 3.490.00 17912 2596 TRADING nnCAVONAL TRADING CG 4/16/93 61.69 17113 AGI AHL. 8870601 4/)6/93 1.350.00 SCn VIrF SERVICES IC CHARTF9 R I INC I • • • RIIAT CITY M1N,,I COCA96CGA XARR A VIN V F N 0 C R N A M E 17641 IM, I-Mi HII YT 111 °4fM Cn I7N44 5112 Iri�T A" o4n1- T7645 1 L1A••q Tllt(X fl°CTRIC 17645 114S IVS _c PYIIfS INC 17847 5'75 Iy TI FITY —IT 19S�C 1 7644 SI IR 1'ETL (ENS] XI nG OEI IC IAL I7P.49 6IIS , e. G:•SCVCIE 17651 n1i1 111S�Y I11I1544SIf'H41 GP lV nl 11.111.2 i T'1 Tru1n Cn 0 PI 115 IN( E.hLIF CIiICS ,ACX119F SVC, CE, RnnENT ICHAEL S RILL C RANI 1R 4F SOIPLY RAVFI C 1 TNG CHG ( XGXT EX�I DY IINIC 9 'R. A H F SYSTFHS C WARRANT RF(.nNCIL I*N 4/06/93 OATE RFFFAENCE DISLWNT NET 70.0)4.41 1,005.16 738.00 10.00 41.50 116.36 913.27 VAGe 2 J 0 v v V V J ■867 CITY OF RA4CN0 CUCARONG4 WARRANT RECCNCILIATION 4106/83 PACE 3 PARR A YFN A Y F N 0 0 R N A P E NARR JOURNAL DISCOUNT NET GATE R F -REN E 17116 PT09 SOLLTVAN PF RIAFRT 4106/83 1.650.00 17917 17919 BT•0 8715 SUN 1FIEL¢A4f SHPT CF 0lF44FNT9 4/96/83 470Gf R3 96 AO 6.50 17919 8751 TFXA, 4/06/R3 21.38 1792O A746 T,AFFIC CIWTRCL SFPVICE 6/06/21 746.05 279:l 4TP0 TRG45-FEST FORD TIUCK 4/06/A3 21.38 14131.20 17923 8%l UVITFOTIN�t'p" \TIPI SFRY 406/83 179,4 9105 VAINIA' VICHARI 0 4/06/81 49.80 17925 17914 92 L -1110 NAILACt C 45L C SCOTTY WSSEPSP! IAOFTN Y 4/06183 4/06/R3 130.00 50.00 17927 9'99 4FST P!I?L �5N MG Cr 4/06/R3 40.28 LISHFR$ 9000 17929 9401 NHI1HCY.SRAPY 4/06183 179i0 9400 %FR9Y CPR °PR AT LOU 4/06/03 2,499.68 17931 VOIO FIHAI TOTALS 4/06/83 FINAL TOTALS 259.984.71 -4- m • • • CIJF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE WARRANT :Y 2/09/83 208 2/09/83 209 2/09/83 210 2/09/83 211 2/03/83 212 2/09/83 213 2/09/83 214 2/09/83 215 2/09/83 216 2/11183 217 2/22/83 218 2/22/83 219 2/23/83 220 C SFIV, • WARRANT REGISTER ASSESSMENT 82 -1 FEB *3 DISTRICT VENDOR ACTIVITY ACCOUNT k AMOUNT So. Calif. Landscape Maint. Contract Services 49 -23-28 $ 4,281.13 Kim Hawker Refund 49 -23 -98 500.00 Associated Engineers Contract Services 49-23-28 23,167.98 Williamson E Schmid Contract Services 49-23 -28 368.00 City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfers 49-23-99 7,942.00 Willdan Associates Contract Services 49 -23-28 1,136.00 General Telephone Utilities 49 -23 -21 61.73 Surveyor's Service Capital Equipment 49 -23-44 5,525.40 Hatch Bedrosian Contract Services 49 -23 -28 1,280.00 Bonademan,McCain Inc. Contract Services 49- 23-28 1,089,809.62 Olympic Sales Co. Inc. Materials E Supplies 49 -23 -38 95.35 Office of Procurement Printing E Publications 49 -23-23 574.74 (State of California) Hatch Bedrosian Contract Services 49-23-28 1,280.00 TOTALS S 1,136,421.95 C SFIV, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n,,4 �0, MEMORANDUM i Date: March 16, 19 H3 t-> To: City Council and City Manager 1977 From: Bill Holley. Director, Community Services Department Subject: Request Authorization to Attend League of California Cities Community Services Conference, Fresno; National Recreation and Park Association Revenue Sources Management Institute, San Diego. These two seminars do not appear in this year's City budget. This is the first League Community Service Conference conducted and was not scheduled until after our local budget was adopted, therefore, was not submitted for review. The NNPA Revenue Institute does not occur this fiscal year (dates are in July). However, space is limited and registration must occur by June 24. In regards to the League's Community Service Conference, as it is the first one, it has no track record or reputation. The announcement does indicate, however, a worthwhile action agenda that could provide ideas for Rancho • Cucamonga. Cost of Registration, transportationr food and lodging not to exceed $390. The NRPA seminar, on the other hand, has a very good track record and is _ spoken of highly by those professionals who have attended in the past years. It deals primarily with the 'pursuit and operation of revenue generating facilities' in the municipal recreation field. While we do fairly well now with our limited facilities, there are always ways to improve. This seminar may provide some new ideas toward making a good thing better. Cost for registration, dormitory lodging and meals at the University of California, San Diego, is $330, plus transportatione for this Saturday through Wednesday program. Total coat including transportation not to exceed $400. Staff Recommendation: Authorize Community Services Director to attend the seminars as described above, and authorize described expenditures form the Community Services budget. BH /mw P .. I a. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 >!! TO: City Council and City Manager -- 19ii FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Release of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement requested by Thomas and Barbara Trombatore for completion of improvements at 6881 Amethyst Avenue Thomas and Barbara Trombatore have requested a release of the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement accepted by City Council on September 1, 1982 per Resolution No. 82 -156. This agreement was to guarantee the off -site improvements adjacent to their property located at 6881 Amethyst Avenue. These improvements have been completed and final inspection was made on March 4, 1983. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the release of said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Respectfully submitted, 5i yY : Y jaa Attachments f MIGNONETTE ST F C Pod i 'n') t PROJECT tab SITE b W Seal d0 a 4 +• AMETHYST (D CITY OF RANCI 10 CUCAMONG\ •c:�LL, p ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY NIAP 1977 A N title; page v ' � For 2 \1 �+ L ` \ siJE� F C Pod i 'n') t PROJECT tab SITE b W Seal d0 a 4 +• AMETHYST (D CITY OF RANCI 10 CUCAMONG\ •c:�LL, p ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY NIAP 1977 A N title; page 0 February 16, 1983 iml Thomas s Barbara Trombatore 17212 Golden View Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714) 987 -0494 Ei!�d!EERR:9 CIV:ii71�, Barbara Krall City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P.O. Box. 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Barbara: We would like the Lien Agreement on the property located at 6881 Amethyst, Alta Loma, CA 91701 removed. The requirements regardinc the curb, gutter, sidewalk and street have all been met, approved by the city inspectors and signed off. If there is a problem regarding this matter, please call me at work (714) 898 -0895. If there is no problem I expect to receive the cancelled document in the mail in approximately 1 - 2 weeks. Thank you, LC Barbara A. Trombatore N RECORDING REQUESTED 8Y _ • AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CJTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 NOTICE OF RELEASE OF LIEN Let notice be given that the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby release its lien Which it had caused to be recorded on the Tend hereinafter more fully described, said lien having been Placed thereon by the recording of a contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Thomas and Barbara Trombatore dated September 1, 1982 and recorded September 9, 4982 as Document No. 82. 180559 Recorded in Official Reco•ds, San Bernardino County, State of California. The description of the land is as follows: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 5130, AS RECORDED IN 800K 61. PAGE SAM RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, GENERALLY KNOWN AS 6881 AMETHYST AVENUE IF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation BY; On tke s, ay0r STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On ,19 ,before me, the on er5ig0edo d Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Jan D. Mikels, known to me to be the Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation that executed the within Instrument, known to me t0 be the person who executed the within Instrument, on behalf of said municipal corporation, therein named, and ac kn o wle d Bed to me that such municipal corporation executed the same. N my Ndn and 0 Cid Spd. Notary PubT% in and or said Slate e. r n ) 6 • P ! " RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM THOMAS AND BARBARA TROMBATORE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 82 -156 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Thomas and Barbara Trombatore; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Rea. -de of San Bernardino County, California, on September 9, 1982 as Document No. 82- 180559; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clerk shall cause this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk is Jon 0. Mike s, , ayor K] r L 7 �.mvncnnrirunnrrremrnwnA _.�<a..,. rlelocate an approved house onto the property located atr6123 Amethyst Avenue. As a prequisite to issuance of a building permit, City Council ordinance No. 58 requires the installation of public improvements. To guarantee the installation of the off -site improvements, Mr. and Mrs. Lovitt have submitted an Improvement Agreement and a Time Certificate of Deposit in the amount of 83,600.00. RECOMMENDATI04: It is recommended that City Council accept the Time Certificate of Deposit and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the attached resolution and improvement agreement on behalf of the City. Respectfully submitted, LBH, S:jaa Attachments STAFF REPORT_ C r CSI A QQ flii U Z DATE: April 6, 1983 197; TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer By: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ao Improvement Agreement Security for 6123 Amethyst Avenue submtted Leah Land rlelocate an approved house onto the property located atr6123 Amethyst Avenue. As a prequisite to issuance of a building permit, City Council ordinance No. 58 requires the installation of public improvements. To guarantee the installation of the off -site improvements, Mr. and Mrs. Lovitt have submitted an Improvement Agreement and a Time Certificate of Deposit in the amount of 83,600.00. RECOMMENDATI04: It is recommended that City Council accept the Time Certificate of Deposit and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the attached resolution and improvement agreement on behalf of the City. Respectfully submitted, LBH, S:jaa Attachments title: CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA 6123 Ameth Avenue GNUNRP.RING DIVISION Page N T wn" VICINITY AI, \P 1 \1l1 /9 OF RINCHI .!A AIIRM M::T fo r 6123 A- rthyst Avenue (API 1062 -401 -12) KBCV ALL MEN By VIFSE PRESE17S: MIt this agreement is made and entered into, In contomance with the provisions of the Municlpal Code and dr ;u:a- ttons of the City of Rancho Curo ooga, Srnce of California, a coaccicip., c - poracion, hen•insfeer referred to av the City, by and between said City and cv�t_audlnax t 'y.,,pacC�D9 +Dint t_ynants�_ Ma �l hera.waer for vrrod to as the oeveloper, flIT5E55E 11t MAT, :H -REAS, p:¢sunat to said Code, Developer has requested approval b the City of, F1pr I+CP.tl,eSi"QYEn ,e in accrrda[re with the provisions of the report c Lhe C..nus!rr Developnent Director v thereon, .rod en onendaahts thereto[ F1iCRv,S, he City bas established c n requirements to be net by said deve toper prior m gran r ing the fin a l`ap at oval of the development{ and 1. The developer hereby agre e s to construct it developer's ns a ail -- rnents descrihed on page 3 hereof within __,jn mn'ps frog [he data hereof. 0. DO tern of this agrecnent shall be nn rani x. -encinp o the date of n f by the Cit v. Pits shall be fn , dahu:c as the rdav t fallouts, the last day of file term �cripulated, unless said term has been extcnded an haretoafter proviJed. 3. T,a Developer nay re qn eat additional time in which to Ooriplete the pr,i- of this agrecnent, in writing nor tosn than four woks prior to th- default dace, and including a smtemene of a,clostances of necessity for eddIDionnl time. In .unsidar.at(on of cloth re qn ter, the City r I- right to real., the prow is (on= hrreaf. Jorls,a, construction agandards, a"' x. rote, and suCficiu acv of he lrp rnvrme nt s Arita, and to require au, u.t genes U,crrcn when w.ur.xrted by substantial chan5es thorefn. 4. If tl,e Developer fails Or necicrts to tempi, .1U, the provisions Of this stn :P.one, the Cftl shall h.rvr the r,oht at a v time to c auve raid prtrvi- in h.• cam pluud by goy 1—f al : con, ..", an reupon m r roe frcm ,.,i De m•W ter an:l /ur his Silouty cha fall wont and iocpencle incur nvl in ro 5. I:nr ro.irh"nt Pomib: 111111 ho 1f:tajhi h9 [h; IS•vrloprr from Ihr rfr;ro of rho. C rt v 1111e. 1:1—r prior to ..tart of any' ti .:[hill [he puhlly choir ad the jol, mr ,.11t ,. nAmt sn'h . In Cult emp1:, with I rIn �r - I....no-., rant tlnfd tln.o.:n. m - ,II c., m .Dlr , mh•p :i n{ Ill ao c. by the CLL„ od .:.,, ..n. al of the p. n it r l r v, n rnvlJnI n. 14 - I I., .i c I I rpra -t — np: wl :hall I. I ea."."od ,.w Ir , t 1 II S d. v,r+ nth w,. vi L , fl 1 I I tl t r 11 I, , tI nt .. .,a lnr d. oral L .d , .,. ,. r .r I y., �.r r':I It, :al rt v. RC I 1.\ Iu 4MZMEAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of lnproveacat s au,t7 as hera.afcei Otter, and approved by the City Attorney, a e deemed in be equivalent to prior completion of Said repairenents for the purpose of securing said approval: • MO:.', TI-[E-FORE, it is hereby by betweeh Cit, a5reed and the as fotic +s: and the Developer 1. The developer hereby agre e s to construct it developer's ns a ail -- rnents descrihed on page 3 hereof within __,jn mn'ps frog [he data hereof. 0. DO tern of this agrecnent shall be nn rani x. -encinp o the date of n f by the Cit v. Pits shall be fn , dahu:c as the rdav t fallouts, the last day of file term �cripulated, unless said term has been extcnded an haretoafter proviJed. 3. T,a Developer nay re qn eat additional time in which to Ooriplete the pr,i- of this agrecnent, in writing nor tosn than four woks prior to th- default dace, and including a smtemene of a,clostances of necessity for eddIDionnl time. In .unsidar.at(on of cloth re qn ter, the City r I- right to real., the prow is (on= hrreaf. Jorls,a, construction agandards, a"' x. rote, and suCficiu acv of he lrp rnvrme nt s Arita, and to require au, u.t genes U,crrcn when w.ur.xrted by substantial chan5es thorefn. 4. If tl,e Developer fails Or necicrts to tempi, .1U, the provisions Of this stn :P.one, the Cftl shall h.rvr the r,oht at a v time to c auve raid prtrvi- in h.• cam pluud by goy 1—f al : con, ..", an reupon m r roe frcm ,.,i De m•W ter an:l /ur his Silouty cha fall wont and iocpencle incur nvl in ro 5. I:nr ro.irh"nt Pomib: 111111 ho 1f:tajhi h9 [h; IS•vrloprr from Ihr rfr;ro of rho. C rt v 1111e. 1:1—r prior to ..tart of any' ti .:[hill [he puhlly choir ad the jol, mr ,.11t ,. nAmt sn'h . In Cult emp1:, with I rIn �r - I....no-., rant tlnfd tln.o.:n. m - ,II c., m .Dlr , mh•p :i n{ Ill ao c. by the CLL„ od .:.,, ..n. al of the p. n it r l r v, n rnvlJnI n. 14 - I I., .i c I I rpra -t — np: wl :hall I. I ea."."od ,.w Ir , t 1 II S d. v,r+ nth w,. vi L , fl 1 I I tl t r 11 I, , tI nt .. .,a lnr d. oral L .d , .,. ,. r .r I y., �.r r':I It, :al rt v. RC I 1.\ Iu pled C B'M IC E :![I:f ACME! i' ;I 0 1. :L 1' r :n I.4: c '[meow Q1.111 ,I i l igvnt P: ed_to c -plo- t i'to; tlm City 1lmll •' a [Im rl :;6t tr : npl, to am ,, all v he of r :,trfi:.l,clay J ,rqr l v t lI•n�. Ind II r r oil t t�. .m ,'lured it's , Ure Devolo'n, and /ar'his can t re star by any 1,. :'i R. tiw Duev lope, 'hall b, re"mrsib h• for rryd.m eron t, re la social, o vat of a aeponvnc of a atLan •enter sy"em i emflictr it!, the r r,d work to the sacisfact[on of the City Engineer and the 'ow. of the ator sys,em. .er 9. The I'll'1ai @r sha 11 1l res pons cb le for I, m, 1,, n f nil ]u osa rook a o :i IIheI k1`hris fra-r till mnblic r eht of way r slicing from work done an the adja- cent proper[.. or wit Lin said 1161,[ of v 10. Th' 1),1a)d •r .ball PLnn[ .nnl m,,.coin parkway [lees as directed by [!:c Wmmneity Dcv n ¢lapa¢ Director.B il. T'ac i B ent s ,ity to be Inrni'Ired by the Davulnpev to g'nn an [de m :d,,I,In.1 1111 terms of tills'Freers.•','Ball be sob idle to the .n nil of the Citv Atto,noy. The principal a not, of said improvement secari L, shall be not less than the amount shown Below: 1!D'BL`VU1.NT SECURITY SUBNITTE: Faithful Performance Bond 12,400.00 TYPE SL'RLTY /dGCNT PRINCIPAL AIOU::T Material and Labor Bond $1,210.11 • P: III T::::5$ OEREn P, [1,v Pasties Fere u. luvv mused Or,II pre s el is to be del- exes-itod and a oelcdeed with ,It formalities requl red by Aaw on the dales set far Ur oppos:ce [heir sfgna['re s: BY: �i ` DATE: Y4 BY �. ✓ � / � ^,f�/� BATE: Y• j/ -S'/ MIT,' 055: '�o DATE: $TATr. 01 mALUM1111 10, STI ol son Dernardinp _� ss AoRwt 911 1981 _ r r• r^,ap arn.,., w' 'YaY .bofH A so..... Gr = Leah J,_ Lovftt _. �a m.rn '•I, rr n. nr B n.l n I^rr.l. i d,Ir BA Be r rlleY'Ir. ,r ,rnA rlA. E e � rJ eaP�a fOq ryO iA qY 9[AL Ofl ST.'Mf • 0 E DATC; 1,CMIT No.-Conlu-ln I., stof, AM azltlqvSt Ale, :Lt, D,,in, :;..3 avv roes -am -t2 =57MCTIO4 COST ESTV-ATE CO.ISTRI C7 ION COST tlmg"� f CtNI.q 5 7 75_ Tlll'.L IISTI 0Z :1 r',J!PTAL 011%) --st 700 1-1ZIN'l I:;,- ME 9 • RESOLUTION N0. g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 6123 AMETHYST AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on August 21, 1981, by Harley and Leah Lovitt as developer, for the improvement of there n,cand 9generally located on oAmethyst real Avenue rbetween y Banyan Street described and Lemon Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, conjunction with the development of said real property; and is secured and accompanied by which is identified in said described in said is to be done in WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement good and sufficient Improvement Security, Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreeme the and aid and • Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved Rancho Cucamonga, and sign te City Clerk to attest thereton behalf of the City of C PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk r] don D. Mikels, Mayor Iq r, LJ • V] h' i t nTMV nC D A T.TOUn f TTn A MnNTO a STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: City Council and-City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer 2 3 C f' U 1977 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Street Improvement Agreement and Security for CUP 82- 01 submitted by Etiwanda Investment Company (Pic- N•Save) The subject project located on the north side of Fourth Street and approximately 2,300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue, is submitted by Etiwanda Investment Company. The project was approved by the Planning Commission on March 24, 1982. The street improvement agreement and security have been submitted by Etiwanda Investment Company to guarantee installation of the street improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance: $273,000 Labor and Material: $136,500 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the acceptance of the street improvement agreement and security for CUP 82 -01 and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Respectfully submitted, LBH15:jaa Attachment /9 11 V. I., I o------------- llpACI MCI IllAll wl PROJECT SITE ftL 2 28; P�, 3 P., 2 1.7o K. J!, e I P., a —F Q'JR F CITYOFR> km-1 10 CUCAMONGA CUP EINGINVERING, DIVISION VICINITY MAP W7 N page lq 10 Pitch Nag Card Courier No. 6135 • Margin = 12 - 96 6136 CITY OF RANCID CCCX4r!:GA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESENTS: That this acreement in cade and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Musician! Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, state of Cal'_ - Eornia, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and Etinanda Investment Co. [Hereinafter referred to as the Developer. WITiESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has recuested approval by the City of Rancho D.icaronea , in accorda -.ce with the provisions of the report a. the Community Development Director thereon, and any amendments thereto; located on the north side of 61h ' ;,-t, aoeror. 2300 ft. west of Etiwanda and Ave. WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said developer prior to granting the final approval of the development; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all improvements described on paceslWhersof •aithin I year from the data hereof. 2. The term of this agreement shall be one (11 year commencing on the date of execution hereof by the City, This agreeaent shall be in default on the day following the last day of the tern stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior t0 the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional tire. In considers [ion of Such request, the City reserves the rich.[ to raview tho provisions hereof, including Construction standards, cost estimate, and Suf- ficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial chances therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to c a a - said provisionr to bn completed by env lawful means• and thereupon to recover from said DCveloper and /or his surety the full cost and a , se interred in no done. 5. Encroachment Derni[: shall be obtained by thu Developer th, "iLe e: the Cr:Y Epp vne9r prior tl ,tort Of 1l Y! wp C[ N'i thin the, publ.a rwnt -of -ws'i• Hva ,love iorna the L1 cc aduct such work in full co!nyl11u' :' d1th t1:e, reoulat,ons craw ir.e: therein. :pn- cumpLranee na r su!' in sropprnq of ch,! mnrk by Lhe Cit , and nsso r.smt nt of penalri�•s pvovid�d. 0 e 0 6. Public right -of -way improvement work required sba ' he constructed in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard S purifications, and Standard Drawings and ary special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other - incidenta.l work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. 7. Work, done within existing streets shall be diligcntl? pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay is completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of a v component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way r sulting from work done on the adjacent property or within said 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Dole 11 to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be s-ac -cct to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of saui improvement security shall be not less than the amount sho..n below: INPROVEY•E21T SECURITY SUBMITTED: (4th St -S 23,000) Faithful Performance Bond (7th St - 5250,000) 5273,000.07 • Material and Labor Bond (4th St- S 11,500) 5736 500 00 (7th St ,5125,000) IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have mused t e presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formolities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures: /) DEVELOPER By :, _/ l DATE:= BY: „C", ..�, //.i < -- -_ DATE: WITNESS: ��0.4 /� l.:'�+r'4 -- _ DATE: YY CITY of RANCIIO CL'CAF10AGdr CALIFORNIA a municipal corporation BY: _, NAVnn ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE: -')1 r L E u Nr 1 u '• Encet J CITY OF R.VX110 CUCAIO::CA CO %ET^.l'CTION AND 80::D ESTI:LITE ESLFOACID:ENT PERMIT FEE SCNCHO'JLE (Attach to "tmpector': WpY'7 DATE: 12/92 PE"11T %0. COFIPL'TED OT File Fef"Ince OR 32 -32 City Dr.,viny No .s 4th St. ONLY NOTE: Does net i-¢Lule current fce for vvitin3 penit or pnve-.,t reply:, ment deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTI:LVILL ITEM ora! ITY r L" p v F.C.C. : - S" LF. .. f. T.C.C. Cu,b nnl, W' C.F. _ A.C. E••rn IS2111n -10 L. F. _ a" '.C.C. 5:nit 5.;75 S.F. I 5" nrtw Apnrnnrh S. f. S" P.C.C. rmcc nutter S.F. Strew E...... ion I C.Y. I- It'd Elt AI1'nC,t (LY. Pre•+nrat ion of cn4 trade I S.F. 1 A.C. Inver LJ1300 ncl A.C. rn 1J00 tonal FIN (—d A.C. :nee: snn co pnn t n<) Tn•' n:• •,nn t neI ❑MY Pntth A'0. (trnn„h) I F. nd: "I: : ,do fi I '1. 1 M I I 1 1 r t .1 Ctta-'! CTl ^'; COST 20.755 CC.:IIE6M ?CY COSTS 2.241 'rOI,V, CONS TRIM.. I 11q;::0575 23.OP', FU I:IIfi'!. "rP.F � ".H.AYCE BC;C (100;:) IAE,'1 A::'a :(\TFRTAI, I)J:.TI (50):1 IL500_ IEEE LE) n :.•11.:. r.;r P ^.: i')CP rG \S'lll -n- mn,.1 4 CITY OF RA!XISO CUC•%MONGA • CONSTRUCUON AND BOND ESTULWE ENCRO,CICIENT PE !1T FEE SCH -' OULE (Attach to "Ins?cerat's copy") DATE: 12/82 PEK417 No. =TtTED BY File Reference OR 82-32 City Dr.oin, N..s 783 7th St. ONLY `:OTC: D.ec net include c.crc,t fee for .1i1ir, pr-it ., Pavement r.,locc- -1 d.,.sils. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMUM ITF'! OVANI TTY CNIT CncT F. P. Q. V, 1 - 24 "C.° - 3,35 7 L.P. r 62 : F. 5.50 A.C. 9vrn I5200 -.in) I 3.590 L.F. 4.50 16 Icc 4" P.C.V. 5id-dlk �1— S.F. 6" ilri.-r krrracn S. F. P.r.C. r r�,, ';,.ttd, 1 503 S.F. 3.40 i.— - Stroat EY "vation 5-255 - = 1.50 Imearced 1�barkm,nnt -j of Subl.lre S.F. 0.15 -e 78 j !71, I.C. 30.00 A.C. MO t, 1300 I.W ION ,.r. (,1 100 n 900 TON A. C_ 1d,, 5nn I—) TON pn,,E A.C. fz,rr,hl I.n. 1. �Idde I EA. Ad'-, ,1— In 1;11,1r I FA. Fl. 200.00 2C' eflectcr Post I I E,i. J5.UU 11 RetaInj 11 7-i� -rT-- —7T-u- 18 rR�P I J- EtQ�a�� L.I. 7707- —Sao 2, � P kiN o, —F--= 77— 30w00 3. I'D 36" PCP '2000 01 1 36 L.F. 38.00 1.368 .R., RCP (mo 0 36 L.F. 481100 11728 Catch daSin W = 4 4.6GO Local Depression 4 1 4 EA, 500.00 2.0'9 Man H l 1 EA, 2,000,M) 2JCO 1 308 �l L.r. imo 3 69 M6 %,%V (wood) 1 74 1 L.F. 25.00 1,8 i0 S..tot 51 1.00 50 8eanwal 48 Irch win 5 1 !F .o .' 20 030 St,uct. Cnn,. CO. Crlo,lt C.Y. 275.00 3.300 COUSTRUMON COST 227,303 COT;TI%GI7XY COSTS 22.730 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 250.033 FAIIINUL PERFO;CIANCE SO= (100%) 210,000 Milk!', ANN 'MIRIAI. WM (50%) MX100 I : r, 1:; L U! INC 17,S11 C, T: ON rM: 1016-15 (rr.E scmnu.) :,,.1'!A!.rATTCN olyZn .0- t—"'""eee!e 0 0 FAITHFUL PEF.F04!ANCE 90`:0 is K WHERMS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamon9o, State of California, and (hereinafter designated as 'pri ncipal ") have entered into an agreement designated whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain public improvements, which said agreement, dated 198 , and identified as project - is heee c referred to and mart pa ri ereor; and. WHEREAS, said principal is reeuired under the terms o_` said said agreement co furnish a bond for the faithful performance of agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and s surety, are held ana itr -Iy bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "Ctt'; in the penal sum of .ed sry aad0ELl"O - "- '- al o: __lwnJ=dnDA .awrul ro ra? collars IS _ _ the Um [e States, o[ tie payment o wn is r. sum ve 1 and truly to be and ad:trii- made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors strators, jointly and severally, f sily by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, by, and • successors or ass ians, shall in all things stand to and abide truly keep and per`.orm the covenants, conditions and prclloiens well and any alteration thereof made as therein in the said agreement and to be kept and performed at the time provided, on his o[ their part, therein Specified, and in all respects acccrdi:-.a to and in the manner their tree intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save har-.less then City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, it shat: be and this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, remain in full force and effect. As a Of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the part face amcvnt specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attornev's fees, be incurred by City in suceesof -I ly enforcing such obligation, all to taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and ag reas ttat no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to iba corns of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anyw ieo affect its obligations on this bond, and it does herebv waive notice of any such chance, extension of time, alteration or addi tram to the terms of the agreemnn< or to the work or to the s prdf ica tic.v - -. IN W: Tt:L SG Y]IiE ?W!'. thin L,s n,,, ut `.a: . ",n du'; exe<u tad by the •In ^__ princip it and surety nb,,vc named, . 198 -., is K 0 LLB OR ,190 NATER.LIU!E:1 50x0 WHEREAS, the city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonce, State of California, and (hereinafter designated as "principal') have entered into an a, cement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, tlated 198 and identified as project — r __. is ae reav re ?errea m and aaae a pas e reo�,�• dnC, WHEREAS, under the terms of said acreement, principal is roc ui red before entering upon the performance of the vork, is file a aocd and sufficient payre ni bond with the City of Ran Coo Cucavo nca co secure the claims to which reference is made in title 15 (comaencto with Section li orni of part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code o Ue State of California. HOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other Persons enployed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sus of poe_Wlnd d. thfrcv-c' th d d five hundred and 00/100 -------- ors Is ^for mat ^ri� lea or scar thereon or any kind, or orbs due under h Unemployment Insurance Act with resoeca to such work or labor, that said surety will pav the same in an amount not execadina the amount herein hove set forth, and also in case suit is broucht upon this bend will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and roast r, able expanses and fees, including reasonable attorney's Fees Cora: red by , City in successfully enfo[ci ng such obligation to b , e awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to he included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3083) of Part 4 OF Division 3 of the Civil Cade, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of tine, al Gera tlon or addition to the terms of said agreement or the sneg ifica Lions accompanying the same shall in nny manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS :i IIED CO F, this: instrucmar has been duly executed by the pnn ::tpll in'i ::urce; i.. .,.a na rn•d, an - I9B • _� as fr • SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK WILSHIRE CENTER C., .E. 3435 W ILSH "' SOULEVAYD. Lq' >NGELES, CaLIFIRN11 yG01p March 15, 1983 City of Rancho Cuca�onga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucaronga, California 91730 Gentle : This will serve as notice and agreeInant that Security Pacific National Bank, a financial institution subject to regulations by the State or Federal Government, shall hold on deposit the sum of $409,500.00 for the benefit of the city of Rancho Cucamonga for faithful nerformance and payment of material and labor for sub- division imorovevents as outlined on attached construction and bond estivate on a project in Rancho Cucamonga known as Pic 'N' • Save Site (Etiwanda Investment Ccrpany) , County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to that agreement dated March 15, 1983, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Etiwanda Investment Coim,any, a General Partnership. The entire sum of $409,500.00 will be disbursed in stages noon prior written authorization and direction of a duly authorized representative of the City of Rancho Cucaronga. This agrcu t shall expire either upon disburserlent of the $409,500.00 or upon coapletion and acceptanco by the City of Rancho Cucavonga of that portion of the aforementioned work secured by this instrument. Very truly ;ours, Karen D. IL. ,,sen Vice President This agreemnt approved: a Amcral. Partnership Theodore Lwicker, Gencral Partner kajph•D. P,&, , Csicral Partner g (z E r m LL V RC I 0 E U E a n m STATE OF CALIFORNIA Iss COUNNOF Los Angeles On March 15, 1983 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State. personally appeared Karen D. Hansen end -ILWIL 11 / / /I////////// / / IF /// /l /If i/ parsenalN known to me for proved to me on the bases of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons who executed the within Instrument as =_Mlce President and___(LLM- 11LMs6Ea&&Iy, on behalf id Security_ Pacific National Hank the corporation therein named. and acknowledged to me that 1� OFFICIAL SEAL such corporation execm <dmewitnln mstrumenttnrownitplts YUKIKO HOSHIKO by laws or a resolution of its board of directors. NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA IN PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN WITNESS my hand and offmeat seal LOS ANGELES (AUNTY / / My Commission Eapues Mar. 29. 1985 Signatura__`v!t—"" (This area for official notarial seeq STATE OF CALIFORNIA jss. COUNTYOF Lm- Angeles i On March_15s 1983 ,belme ma, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said Stale, personally appeared_—TILe_2dore_ZwJsker and RalplL)—WSDgkx personally known 1. me for proved to me on the bases of sale. factory evidence) to be the person Ihat executed the within Instrument.¢._. _tWQ _ _ _.. pare"isl. onbehznol Etiwanda Investment Company, a General Partnership Ine partnership therein named and i,k,.wled,ad Ip me that Il I parinersNp ono.hr d d WITNESS mf nand and official seal Segnalurr—, b� /� en.-. f OFFICIAL SEAL YURI PUBLIC HOSHIKO 1�1 NGTAAY PIIOLIOCALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY LMy Cammessmn Eaodes Mar 29, I9g5 , (This area for olfeceal mA.hrl seal) 0 • 40 • RESOLUTION NO. * 13 - '-I b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITY FOR CUP 82 -01 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on March 15, 1983, by Etiwanda Investment Company as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Fourth Street, approximately 2300 feet west of Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, CUP 82 -01; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said • Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M, 'Wasserman, City Clerk 1 Jon D. Mike s, IAayor a 0 • E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager C'CAMO IP C9 2 + 'n f T Q 0 F,. U > 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Subordination Agreement for 6557 Mulberry Avenue submitted by Mr. and Mrs. McInturf A Lien Agreement for the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement and street light along Mulberry Avenue was approved by City Council on October 6, 1982. In order to secure financing for their property, the lender requires that the Lien Agreement be subordinate to a lien in favor of the lender. Mr. and Mrs. Mclnturf have submitted the attached Subordination Agreement for City Council approval. RECOMMENOATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Subordinaton Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Respectfully submitted, LBH: S:jaa Attachments a9 )n CITY OP IZA \CI 10 title; GXGINFERI.NG DIVISION VICINITY %LAr a � n F, )n SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SEC'„4ITY INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT TO AND LOWER PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY INSTRUMENT. THIS AGREEMENT, made this 16th day of oaten ,19 V by t s la L. Mcinturi , owner o t 1 181 na ne r el natt2^ des or ibea and here ins ter referred to as "Owner" ano the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereinafter referred to as 'City-, owner and holder of the certain Real Property and Lien Agreement hereinafter referred to as "Lien Agreement '. WITNESSETH THAT WHEREAS, seal tmooezey tmprovnmene contzact a„a Lien Agreeren i dated Octer n v, 1982 cpveri ob g: Legal description herein attached as Exhibit eA^ t0 secure Curb, cutter, sidewalk, Pavement, and street Licht .hie was recorded OcM. :e, 19e2 in the Official Records of said County{ an WHEREAS, owner has executed a deed of trust and note in the sum of--------- _ date e A 16 t96] In favor of v. Sue hu�stand and v' thereinafter • re -Oe rr eaHrto asr�Lenne r�', payable wfth Interest and upon the terns and conditions described therein, which deed of trust is to be red girded concurrently herewith; and WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to modifying said loan that said deed of trust last above mentioned shall unconditonxlly 0e and remain at all times a lien or charge upon the land hereinbefore described, prior and Superior to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement; and WHEREAS, Lender is willing to modify said loan provided the deed of trust securing the same is a lien or charge upon the above described property prior to superior to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement and provided that City will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender; and WHEREAS, it is the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender modify said loan to Owner; and City is willing that the deed of trust securing the same shall, as modified, constitute a lien or charge upon said land which is unconditionally prior to superior to the lien or charge on the Lien Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accuring to the parties hereto and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby adkn0'wiedned, and l order to induC9 Lender to modify the loan above referred t0, it is hereby declared, undersStoon and agreed " fellows: (l) that said aced of trust securing said note In favor of Lend, and any rnneeals n extensions thoreof, shall n n c n n d: t i n n a l l y be and rdmain at all times a lien or Cnargr on the property therwin ream hed prior no suoeror to the lien or charge of ton Llen Agr ne mr nt. n u (2) That Lender would not modify its loan above-' described without this subordination agreement. (3) That this agreement shall be the whole and only agreement with regard to the subordnation, of the Tien or charge of the Lien Agreement to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, but only insofar as would affect the priority between the deed of trust and Lien Agreement any prior agreements as to such subordination including, but not limited to, those provisions, if any, contained in the Lien Agreement which provide for the subordination of the lien or charge thereof to another deed or deeds of trust or to another mortgage or mortgages. The City declares, agrees and acknowledges that (a) He consents to and approves all provisions of the note and deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to as modified by that certain modification agreement by and between Owner and Lender, dated ,r,., 11 tan, (b) He intentionally and unconditionally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement in favor of the lien or charge upon said land of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to and understands that in reliance upon, and in consideration of this waiver, relinquishment and subordination • specifcc loans and advances are being and will be made and as a part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other obligations are being and will be entered into which would not be made or entered into but for said reliance upon this waiver, relinquishment and subordination; and (c) An endorsement has been placed upon the Lien Agreement that said Lien Agreement has by this instrument been subordinated to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to. NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION 'WHIG ALLOWS THE PERSON 08LIGATED ON YOUR REAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN, A PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EXPENDED FOR PURPDSES OTHER THAN IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND. March lo, 1983 ff__ DATE Von L. Mc 2 f M1w la G. sic Intuvf ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE NOTARIZED • 7,P- 0 Exhibit ^a" Parcel No. 1: 3Te north 100 feet of the south 400 feet of the north 770 feet of the west 330 feet of the northwest 114 of Section 34, toanship 1 north, range 6 xset, San Betnatdioa Base and Neridiao, according to the official Plat thereof. Parcel No. 2: An a sent for ingress and agrees over and across the at 25 net of the south 120 feet of the north 370 fete of the northwest 114 of Section 34, township 1 north, range 6 west, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, • according to the Official Plat thereof. Parcel No. 3: An easement for ingress and egress over and across the vest 28 feet of the north 250 feet of the northwest 114 of Section 34, fawnshia 1 north, range 6 wesc, San Bernerdina Base and Meridian, according to the Official Plat thereof. Excepting therefrom any portion lying within that parcel of land c ..eyed to the State of Califamia, in the deed recorded Noveaber 21, 1973 in hook 8312, page 63, Officinl Records. 10 .,_fit 33 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM MR. & MRS. MCINTURF AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement and street lights along Mulberry Avenue was approved by City Council on October 6, 1982 and recorded in San Bernardino County on October 28, 1982, Instrument No. 82- 215677; and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above - mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the • City Clerk attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon 0. Mike s, Mayor 3 N- 0 • CJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ciJ�Aw° STAFF REPORT �° j `�y l k" .' Iz DATE: April 6, 1983 1977 TO: City Council and City Manaaer FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Foothill Blvd. and Hellman Avenue Cooperative Agreement with CalTrans The attached agreement sets out provisions between the City and CalTrans for the cooperative improvement of the intersections of Foothill Blvd, with Hellman and Turner Avenues. The City is named as lead agent for the Hellman intersection and CalTrans for the Turner intersection. At Hellman, CalTrans in -lieu of guardrail placement will contribute 425,000 towards full improvement of the intersection. At Turner, the City will contribute funds sufficient to construct improved guardrail within the City right -of -way portions where needed. The approval of this will allow us to go to bid for the improvement of this most visible of intersections. We are currently attempting to receive reimbursement agreements from fronting property owners who will benefit from the program. Once these agreements are received, we will proceed with construction. This project will be complete prior to next winter. Respectfully subr�itted, G LRH:Ua / Attachment _;s rl 08- SBd- 66 -5.6 6 6.6 08201 - 257201 Foothill Blvd at Hellman Ave and Turner Ave District Agreement No. 8 -437 THIS AGREEMENT, ENTERED INTO ON , 1983, is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as STATE, and CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA, a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, referred to herein as CITY RECITALS 1. As Foothill Boulevard (State Route 66) developed over the years into a 4 -lane facility, the turning radii at the intersections of Hellman Avenue and Turner Avenue were not correspondingly increased. Lack of proper turning area has confined turning traffic to very limited maneuvers, contributing to numerous collisions with the guard rail along the open drainage channels adjanent to both cross streets. Consequently, the rail has been frequently damaged and in spots has been practically destroyed. 2. Tn response to CITY's request to correct the hazardous situation a Hellman Avenue, STATE suggested an interim improvement at the inters�etions of Hellman Avenue and Turner Avenue by extending the ... :'Ks of the drainage structures in such a manner that a 4� reasonable turning radius could be provided and rail set behind the rail • that return. Simultaneously, CITY would upgrade guard adjacent to these two avenues at the approaches to Foothill Boulevard. 3. When CITY subsequently decided to improve the Hellman Avenue intersection to CITY'S Master Plan standard, it was mutually decided to proceed on the basis of separate lead agency status for the two respective locations. 4. To distinguish the two separately planned and administered improvement projects, it is proposed to refer to CITY's improvement at Hellman Avenue as HELLMAN PROJECT, and to the improvement by the STATE at the Turner Avenue intersection as TURNER PROJECT. 5, STATE and CITY mutually desire to cooperate and jointly • participate in construction of the aforesaid two improvements and desire to specify herein the terms and conditions under which said improvements shall be constructed, financed and maintained. SECTION I STATE. AGREES: A. TURNER PROJECT 1. To provide plans, specifications and all necessary construction engineering services for the TURNER PROJECT and tc bear STATE'S share of the expense thereof as shown on Exhibit. A, attached, and made a part of this agreement. 2. To construct the project by contract in accordance with the plans and specifications of STATE. • _2_ -?7 :e f 3• Upon completion and acceptance of STATE'S construction contract for improvements for TURNER PROJECT referred to herein, to furnish CITY a statement of construction costs to be borne by CITY as set forth hereinafter in Section II, Article A -2, and to refund to CITY any amount of CITY'S advance deposit remaining after actual costs to be borne by CITY have been deducted. A. HELLMAN PROJECT 1. Upon concurrence by STATE in the award of CITY's contract for improvements at Hellman Avenue, to reimburse CITY within 30 days upon receipt of billing therefor, a lump sum amount of $25,000, which figure represents the total cost that STATE would have incurred within STATE'S right • of way at Hellman Avenue. Said amount of $25,000 represents STATE'S entire financial obligation for HELLMAN PROJECT pursuant to this agreement, and shown on Exhibits B -1 and B -2. 2. To grant to CITY, upon approval of an application for an Encroachment Permit, the right to encroach upon State Route 66 right of way area for the purpose of CITY constructing the HELLMAN PROJECT improvements. SECTION II CITY AG-PEE"': A. TURNER PRCJECT 1. Upon execution of this agreement, to provide STATE a memorandum allowing STATE to encroach on CITY'S right of •wny for the purpose of constructing the TURNER PROJECT. -3- 2. To deposit with STATE within 30 days of receipt of billing therefor (which billing will be forwarded immediately • following STATE'S bid advertising date of a construction contract for improvements referred to herein) the amount of $18,500, which figure represents the estimated cost which CITY would bear for the construction of guard rail at CITY'S approaches to Foothill Boulevard. 3. That CITY'S share of the expense of construction engineering, including all direct and indirect costs (functional and administrative overhead assessment) attributable to such work applied in accordance with STATE'S standard accounting procedures, shall be determined after completion of work and a financial settlement made upon final accounting of costs. Said share will be a sum bearing the same proportion to the total cost of the above- • mentioned constructon engineering as CITY'S actual construction cost bears to the total construction cost of the project. B. HELLMAN PROJECT 1. To provide plans and specifications for the HELLMAN PROJECT together with an application for the necessary Encroachment Permit for work within the existing State right of way in accordance with STATE'S standard encroachment procedures. Said application to be subject to the review and approval by STATE. • -4q- 2. To identify and locate all high and low risk underground • facilities within the project area and protect or otherwise provide for such facilities, all in accordance with STATE'S "Policy on High, and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights -of- Way ". Costs of locating, identifying, protecting or otherwise providing for such high and low risk facilities shall be borne entirely by CITY. CITY hereby acknowledges the receipt of STATE'S "Policy on High and Low Risk Underground Facilities Within Highway Rights- of- 'day" and agrees to construct the project in accordance with such Policy, 3. That any additional private right of way needed for the HELLMAN PROJECT will be acquired by CITY at its sole • expense. 4. To certify to STATE that all additional right of way has been obtained and utility relocation handled pursuant to Section III, Article 13, prior to payment of STATE'S share of HELLMAH PROJECT. SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED: 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this agreement are subjeob to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the allocation of resources by the California Transportation Commission. ?. To waive Construction Permit and /or Encroachment Permit fees Cram each other. C -5- !,1/� 3• Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of • anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any, work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this agreement. It is also agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4 CITY shall fully indemnify and hold STATE harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section. 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this agreement. 4. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in • connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this agreement. It is also agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this agreement. 5. Should ony portion of these p60JECTS be financed with Federal funds or STATE gas tax funds, all applicable procedures and poli ^ies relating to the use of such funds shall apply, notwithstanding other provisions of this agreement. • -6- 4i 6. After opening of bids for the TURNER PROJECT, CITY'S advance • CITY'S deposit will be revised based on actual bid prices. required advance deposit under Section II, Article A -2, will be increased or decreased to match said revised estimate. If deposit increase or decrease is less than $1,000 no refund or demand for additional deposit will be made until final accounting. 7. After opening bids for the TURNER PROJECT and if bids indicate a cost overrun of no more than 15% of the estimate will occur, STATE may award the contract. 8. If, upon opening of bids for the TURNER PROJECT, it is found that a cost overrun exceeding 15% of the estimate will occur, STATE and CITY shall endeavor to agree upon an alternative • course of action. 9• That this agreement and provisions contained herein may be altered, changed or amended by written approval of both, CITY and STATE. 10. Prior to advertising for bids for the TURNER PROJECT, CITY may terminate this agreement in writing, provided that CITY pays STATE for all costs incurred by STATE. 11. If termination of this agreement for the TURNER PROJECT is by mutual agreement, STATE and CITY will bear proportionate costs incurred prior to termination. 12. If any existing public and /or private utilities conflict with the construction of TURNER PROJECT, STATE will make all necessary arrangements with owners of such utilities for their protection, relocation or removal. STATE will inspect the protection, relocation or removal of such utilities. If there -7- a �. are costs involved for such protection, relocation or removal, the STATE will bear the entire cost. • 13• If any existing public and /or private utilities conflict with the construction of th necessary arrangements protection, relocation protection, relocation are costs involved for the CITY will bear the HELLMAN PROJECT, CITY will make all with owners of such utilities for their or removal, CITY will inspect the or removal of such utilities. If there such protection, relocation or removal, entire cost. 14. That, in construction of the TURNER PROJECT, CITY may furnish a representative, at no cost to STATE, if it so desires, and that said representative and STATE'S Resident Engineer will cooperate and consult with each other, but the decisions of STATE'S Resident Engineer shall prevail on work within STATE'S right of way. • 15. That in construction of the HELLMAN PROJECT, STATE may furnish a representative at no cost to CITY, if it so desires, and that said representative and CITY'S Resident Engineer will cooperate and consult with each other, but the decisions of STATE'S representative shall prevail on work within STATE'S right of way. 16. That upon completion of all work under this agreement the existing maintenance agreement between the STATE. and the CITY for both project locations shall continue in effect. 17. That this agreement regarding provisions for TURNER PROJECT shall terminate upon completion and acceptance of TURNER PROJECT by STATE and CITY or on June 30, 1984, whichever is • earlier in time. -8- 8 �7 • E 18. That this agreement regarding provisions for HELLMAN PROJECT shall terminate upon completion and acceptance of HELLMAN PROJECT by CITY and STATE or on June 30, 1984, whichever is earlier in time. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Director of Transportation By District erector -9- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By Mayor ATTEST: city C erk APPROVED AS TO FORM . -�A I 1e-, BY / /'i� �irr am; n¢r rnx wvram Ccumm.:;.. cuircasiA .D IS7E. A6MT �e'i -�/d7 l' 1 C_r', � „,un r.n nul. .n .un rmmol.y - _'!L• -�� > 33 -� 11LIJ! N�� Ile. em `L t_ —L I 19I {! i I 1 • f//�!rP.T�eFC�asT; /B jYfO �I i_ + %%�TE'11N.1AF Oi GU %: 16;,Tn0 FXf 11.617- A �N SAN BERNARDINO' COUNTY IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTHE INTERSECTION OF IURNER AVENUE ••� nnn • ,v �' th Remove Cb Remove MATCH. LINE gc _1' nall `� .?• LL E �rk`{Q W r f o ^ L 0 3 fl �J9}}12n Z `�- ,�� 8I ti v ti al 97 T ,III R }n. Ocfa I 4= B9'S9'03' R•35' L °54.97' T =3499' V �Io M 4O w� o�o . o� :08- / .- 'FIST. AGNr IJ 9 -1/37 Q I �� I " .8-2- VI 1I l4 40, h Q d° 90.'20'23" y' p J �� I � o R -3S• t •ss./9• v h 1p �. kLpW W� vTm o� �'p L @ a � •e d. Et _:lo w � v 75036 .a9 8I$ gc _1' nall `� .?• LL E �rk`{Q W r f o ^ L 0 3 fl �J9}}12n Z `�- ,�� 8I ti v ti al 97 T ,III R }n. Ocfa I 4= B9'S9'03' R•35' L °54.97' T =3499' V �Io M 4O w� o�o . o� n U • E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM March 30, 1983 TO: City Council FROM: Marry Empey - Finance Direct SUBJECT: Draft Request for Claim Attached is a summary prepared by the City Adjuster regarding a claim filed by Gordon & Edens Myers. This claim is the result of certain damage caused by trees placed in close proximity to the Myers's car by city maintenance staff. The thrust of the recommendation is that the City pay the claim of $696.74 to the Myers family as the amount of costs are not recoverable by counter action. The report by Carl Warren & Co. is self explanatory and conclusive. HE /sm /f g Oo.r. CARL WARREN & CO. Sn11,•1 aet 4•'. INSURANCE R5 V=,S nO • AI M ADM IN5TRATE CLAIM gpMIN15TRATO RS 11A IS'al> > e leg .• E,sm.e xD __ (ial eeJ >ec0 SAN' BERNAR[DINO, CA IDA18 5 • n O >.'CC „leas 1>i nl OB <'S..S ae>pz h' +1 D2.16 so s A.o ,o o..cz +pc9e+ Iea .I e•a.ays om ° °s °'n March 21, 1983 REPORT 'l - DRAFT REQUEST City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Harry Empey Re: Principal: City of Rancho Cucamonga Accident: 2 -18 -83 Claimant: Gordon & Edena "dyers Our File: 2580 FLe1 Gentlemen: PREVIEN: This case involves the placement of certain trees by • City personnel immediately adjacent to the claimant vehicle during a windstorm; shortly thereafter, they were blown on top of the vehicle's roof and hood causing minor damage. DRAFT RP.nUEST: Subject to your approval, please issue your dra a payable to Gordon and Edena flyers in the amount of $696.74 and transnit such draft directly to us. PRINCIPAL: City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9320 "C" Baseline Road, P.o. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone 714 -989 -1851. Involved Employees: Bob Zetterburg, Bill Sullivan and finally, Dave Leonara.. COVERAGE: In order. OTI!CR INSURANCE: a. City: Not applicable. h. C3 aimant: Unknown - claimant refused to divulge. SANTA ANA OFFICE SENVES ORANGE COUNTY LOS ANGELES OFf ICE SERVES LOS ANGELES COUNTY OENARO OFFICE SERVES VENTURA AND KERN COUNTIES SAII FERNANDO VALLEY Of FICE L[RVES VALLEY AND AOJAC FNr SAN DIEGO OFFICE SERVES SAN DIEGO AND IMPERIAL COUNTIES SAN SERNAROINO OFFICE SERVES SAN SERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES SANTA OARDARA OFFICE SERVES SANTA DANRANA AND SIN LUIS ODISPO COUNTIES un Page 2 DATE, TIME AND PLACE: February 18, 1983, Friday, approximately • 8:30 A.M., claimant's residence, that is, 10328 Ivy Court, - Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. PREMISES AND CONDITIONS: The single family dwelling at 10328 1vy Court rs owned by the claimants. In addition, a 6 foot wide boulevard composed of grass /rocks and trees borders the {vest portion of the property. OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL: We understand that the aforementioned bouis owner, maintained and controlled by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, particularly the four trees of unknown identity contained therein. The remainder of the premises, particularly the involved vehicle, a 1982 Datsun Maxima, model ,9810 as well as the driveway to such residence are owned by the claimants. POSSIBLE CO- DEFENDANT: None. FACTS IN BRIEF: According to the claimants, 4 berry -type trees owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are situated in the grass and rock boulevard on the West portion of their property. They state that the trees grow quite large, become top heavy and have shallow roots. Further, they state that the City does not trim the trees often enough and, as such, they frequently break during • the frequent windstorms that occur in this area. The claimants have taken it upon themselves to rectify the damage such as staking the trees with their own stakes, however, they have never trimmed the trees. In the latter part of 1982, claimants notified the City of the damage to the trees caused by a recent windstorm. Shortly thereafter, City personnel arrived on the scene and removed 3 of the 4 trees. Such personnel informed the claimants that the trees were removed because the roots broke when they attempted to prop them back up. Claimants indicated their desire to have new trees planted. Therefore, sometime during November or December, 1982, the City called and inquired as to whother or not the claimants were willing to plant new trees if they were supplied by the City. Claimants responded affirmatively. _ On Friday, February 18, 1983, at approximately 8:30 A.M., a City employee named "Bob" (later identified as Bob Zetterburg) appeared at the claimant's residence statiny that he had 2 trees and inquired where they should be placed. Claimant, Marie Myers, was confused as to the reason for the delivery of only 2 trees as opposed to 3 trees and furthermore the delivery of these same type of trees that blew down in previous windstorms. • KO Page 3 • She was under the impression based on previous conversations with City personnel that a different type of tree such as a Pine would be delivered. Apparently, such tree has deeper and more stable roots, a thicker trunk and needles through which the wind will blow. In summary, the claimant contends that it is a better tree during wind conditions. She was under the impression that such trees would be delivered. Claimant also indicates that "Bob" was in an extremely anti- social mood. He was also accompanied by Bill Sullivan who remained in the City vehicle during their conversation. At any rate, claimant instructed Bob to place the 2 trees (contained in buckets filled with sod and soil) adjacent to the garage wall at the West portion of the property. The claimant vehicle was parked in the driveway at the time. Just prior to the arrival of Bob and Bill, claimant heard the rattling of chimes in her back yard indicating that the wind had kicked up. In fact, in order to prevent annoyance to other neighbors, she went out and tied up the chimes. After claimant's brief yet unpleasant conversation with Bob, she returned to getting dressed for work. Shortly thereafter, she • went outside to warm up her car. It was at that time that she discovered that Bob and Bill had apparently placed the 2 trees immediately next to the left front fender of her vehicle as they had been blown onto the hood and roof of her car by the wind. One tree was lying in front of the front end of the vehicle on the driveway; the other tree was lying adjacent to the left front fender of the vehicle. Claimant immediately observed several scratches on the sunroof, left front fender and hood, right front hood and grill which was apparently caused when the trees fell onto these areas. Claimant immediately contacted the City and spoke with Dave Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor. Mr. Leonard arrived on the scene shortly thereafter, spoke informally with the claimant and obtained several photographs. He also indicated to her that she should obtain a repair estimate as well as a claim form from the City. Claimant spent the entire day fulfilling such requests. Note that Mr. Leonard eventually placed the tree next to a wooden fence /gate at the [Vest portion of the property. CO'.T•,RN;;ENT CODE RL'QUIREMENTS: a. Date Verified Claim Filed: Claimants filed their claim with the City of Rancho Cucamonga on February 22, 1963, obviously, it war, filed well within the 100 day Statutory period. S_/ Page 4 b. Action Taken by Public Entity: We understand that there has • been no rejection of the claim at this time by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We recommend that you take no further action with regard to this matter. c. Statute of Limitations: Claimants have 2 years from the date of the incident or until February 18, 1985, to file a lawsuit. PHOTOGRAPHS: We are attaching several self - explanatory photographs for the completion of your file. However, in essence, photographs 1 -4, inclusive, depict the claimant's residence and the grass /rock and tree boulevard borr�,ering the :Vest end of the property. In addition, the photographs depict the claimant vehicle parked in their driveway, however, note that the vehicle was parked immediately next to the West boundary of the driveway at the time of the loss. Apparently, employees Bob Zetterburg and Bill Sullivan placed the trees on the grass immediately next to the vehicle as denoted with red arrows in photographs 1 and 2. Photograph 43 depicts the area from which 1 tree was severely damaged and later removed by City personnel. Photograph #4 depicts the 2 trees delivered by the City on the date of the loss and which were later • relocated by Mr. Leonard. The remainder of the photographs depict the claimant vehicle, particularly the minor damage (scratch marks) which occurred thereon. You will note that the photographs depicting a larger portion of the vehicle, such as the front end, right front fender, etc. do not depict such damage. A closer examination is required. In fact, the photographs depicting the damage were obtained with the use of a macro camera lense. Photographs `19 and 20 were obtained by Mr. Leonard after he was summond to the scene by the claimant. Such photographs depict the tree in front of the claimant vehicle. CITY VCRSION: Due to the minor nature of the damage involved in the claim, we felt that it was not worthwhile both in terms of time and nnnenses to obtain the version of City employees Bob Zettorburg and Bill Sullivan. However, we did speak informally with Maintenance Supervisor Dave Leonard about the matter. Ile confirms tho version of the claimant in that City employees Bob Zettorhurg and Bill Sullivan placed the trees immediately adjacent to the left front tire and front end of the claimant vehicle during the windstorm. Unless we hear from you to the contrary, we will continue with our methodology in not obtaining the versions of these 2 individual Page 5 • CLAIMAi;T VERSION: Gordon and Edena Myers: Confirms Facts in_ Brre t. For further details, please consul*_ the enclosed self - explanatory signed statement of claimant Edena Myers. Note also that she and her husband intend to plant the 2 trees delivered by City personnel on the day of the incieent, however, they are awaiting the one additional tree. Claimants are fearful that City personnel will not plant the trees properly, that is, plant the roots deep enough. They feel that this is a contributing factor for the previous demise of the trees. DAMAGE: 1982 Datsun Maxima, model #810, license number =E S41-4 —(Cal) - expires 2 -83, ID 4JNl1;U01S3CT039551, champaign brown in color, 4 door, A /T, A /C, P /S, P /B, AM /FM/ cassette., mileage 10,220, registered owner: Gordon T. Myers. We acknowledge receipt of the estimate of repairs fror„ Ontario Datsun at 1025 North Mountain Avenue, Ontario, California 91762. Telephone 714- 983 -9511 in the amount of $596.74. As noted their income of. th<: majority of the cost to repairs is for labor, that is, 17.7 hours at $20 per hour equals $354. Such labor includes the painting and matching of the damaged areas. The • remainder of the cost of repairs is for paint, tax, etc. Although we feel that the estimate is excessive based upon our obscrvation of the damage, we feel that the retainment of an independent appraiser and its cost is unjustified as such cost will equal or exceed the possible reduction in the cost of repairs as set forth by Ontario Datsun. 1 In addition, an incidental loss to the property damage is the loss of use of the claimant vehicle and the consequent loss of income. Claimant Edena Myers is the primary user of the vehicle. She is employed as owner and operator of Gordon's Pools and Spa Service at P.o. Box 1184, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701. She possesses a current and valid business license from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, #1- 04770 -L. In essence, she services pools and spas that were installed by her husband. The service includes weekly cleanings at $50 per month. As such, she earns $12.50 per cleaning, hence as a result of her inability to work on the date of the loss as she was ubtaininq an estimate of repairs, a claim form from the City, return of the form to City personnel as well as a discussion with such personnel, etc. she was unable to work on the data rjf thr loss and hence was unable to service 9 account:;. ❑encc, her loss of earnings claim is $100. Page 6 WORK TO BE COMPLETED: a. Investigation: Concluded. b. Claims Remaining Open: Gordon & Edens Myers - PD - $596.74 COMMENTS: In essence, we feel that the placement of the trees by City employees Bob Zetterburg and Bill Sullivan immediately adjacent to the claimant's new vehicle while parked in the driveway was bad judgment particularly in view of the existing windstorm. Even if the City employees did not clearly understand the instructions as given by Mrs. Myers or even if she did not instruct them in this regard, we feel that the use of their independent discretion would have dictated that the trees be placed elsewhere, such as along the West side of the garage. Hence, we feel that the claim presents one of liability and would be best to dispose of it for the minimal amount as demanded by the claimants. According, if you concur with our recommendations regarding liability, please send your draft in the foregoing amount to us; we will exchange it with the claimants for a properly executed and witnessed General Release. • Should you have any questions about this matter, please do not • hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & COMPANY Richard D. Marque RDFt: j Encls: Signed Statement - Edena Myers Photographs - City Owned Property, Claimant's Residence, Claimant VEhicle, damage to Claimant VEhicle, fallen trees depicted (20) cc: Covington & Crowe Attn: E. Dougherty, Esquire • J,'7 Fag- No. ! 7 • J \X' l i 6-e C Y -�� Ct a� CLt.I_ j ..l-� - E'er- 1..;�.�: -v" = L_LL.ti.:. �' z' /.i" `�,�✓ �7•�:�A.f:`.ti�. --�«C- -- - �i..L. i��-- 1.7 -�hF�/ ETC -z•�.� Lc, i, t+,�... -.•c4,�.'CCV� �/�C. 4 �_E.<.- ,. -��.�' �� ..�, -lam C�� l.c�.wt. -C..�. S� Da }e 1 5) "All A$ Page N.. C — �.:5...:�.,.. / 1. ' r �— -� ,� '�=—�� ✓ti�....:._...i__ so Ab Dule 3/ -3/ d Page N, .3 _ ./ice .3�•� - %^ter -:-� 1 �..� /.- c�•(�� - .- o- "��.- /�,��„� / -tea`' . .-5' / Dale 3 Page No. IL � J . � / 7"' / �`n -�� /J fit.`+ —�� -�4� r�. L• , c'• c� - �y/, /1..R.,..,Ai --�� - 1. -e-� � -K��y� � =�L'Y� •L ..r,�,:. -.1�_ •,�.- 1:- .�-.� .- �+ -�..J ter) `y --~�� .�.� -; 11 0 • E a. :4 n TMv ns n n wrn„n nT Tn A I NTn STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer Gam _ np y I.i F' > x 1977 1 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Agreement, Security and Final Map for Tract 11734 submitted by American National Group located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue The subject map located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue is submitted by American National Group. The tentative map was approved by the Planning Commission on October 14, 1981 for a total planned residental development of 98 condominiums on 8.5 acres. The Improvement Agreement and Security have been submitted by American National Group to guarantee installation of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond Monumentation Cash Deposit - Arrow Route $59,000 Vineyard Avenue $47,000 Arrow Route $29,500 Vineyard Avenue $23,500 $ 1,500 Letter of approval have been received from Chaffey Joint Unified School District, Central School District and Cucamonga County Water District. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Security and the signature of said map. Respectfully submitted, � G �y LAH: jaa Attachments S? CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA A CNGINP.PRING DIVISION c - VICINITY ,MAP in " Page CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT1.y'DFRAfvDHO �� CJidr..UNITY rE ,0,,6, 'CAf40Pi.A ) i] i, March 1, 1983 �iAR J 183 A 718. American National 405 S. Beverly Dr. Letter of Certification Beverly Hills, CA of School District Capacity 90212 With.'a the Chaffey Joint union Rich School District and the Alta Loma Hign 5choot attendance boundaries for the foilow:.ng descr :ned project: Location /Description: Tract #11734 Arrow Rt. 8 vineyard Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA • Number of Dwellinas: 96 2- bedroom cond imin imums (Note: was 98) Anticipated Completion Date: unknown The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for 15 students will be provided within 24 months of the comp tion of the above project. This certification is given on the condition that the State of California continues to fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease /Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State Allocation Board may fund all school building projects under its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall expire 90. days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that 9D -dav period shall validate such commitment. Superintendent /Asst. Suoerinte by Dianne Allen 1 cc: Planninc Division City of Rancho Cucamonga C CENTRATI. DIS'y RIOT �CNlLD:EU _;." ;! ALLOWED •Dhn. Ab cLd Rmh A. . A1.,,., .a..b., 61.n E. Oyd.., M. -e., hmd. J. V /riy Ft, Af.mb.. N.rm.n C. G.;fh, Ed. D., J— -1 John A. MdLry. Anuvnf s.p.r �. 947 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Te1.714 -90 "9 -6541 March. 9, 1993 LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHCOL DISTRICT CA?ACI.Y Within Central School District and Central School District Attendance boundaries for the following described project: Location /Description Tract 11734 - Northwest corner Arrow E Vinovard (ADIERICAV NATIOWL GR(l1 ) Number of Dwelling Units Ninety-six (96) condominuns Anticipated Completion'Date December, 1933 Gentlemen: The Central School District hereby certifies that the Capacity for stude::ts will be provided within 24 months o the completion o? the above project. This certification given on the condition that the State of California conti^.ves to fund the provisions of Leroy F. Greene Lease /Purchase ;.ct of 19%6, or any successor Act, in such manner that the Sta_e Allocations Board may fund all school building projects uncer its current rules and regulations without priority points. The commitment of this capacity shall e"ire 90 days from the date of this letter. Approval of the final man or the issuance of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamour=_ within that 90 day period shall validate such commitment. Sincerely; . PIu1` :l: A. COSGI District Superintendont cc: Cite of Rancho Cucsnonga Cilti %AI SCHOOL j Tc1, 714VJ7•JSAI COC'AMOf MA JUN"N, H:Gli SCHOOL 7611 II, 1...o. Arc. Id. 714; 0 :,1709 00NA MEPM 501001. 10IJ3 1.1. All. St. Tcl. 71 09:0'l(00 �J VAttr VISTA SC" 7727 Volic Yhm lel. 711,, STI C December 13, 1982 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Availability of Water and Sewer Service for Tract No. 11734 Gentlemen The above mentioned property is entitled to water service • from this District, and said service is subject to pipe- line extension policies, rules, regulations and rate or- dinances of this District. Adecuate waterline and water storage capacity exists and will exist to serve the above referenced property at the time of occupancy. In addition, the sewer system capacity and the sewer treat- ment plant capacity will be sufficient to serve the above mentioned property at the time of occupancy. Yours truly, CU'CCAAMOONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NYC /Tl2EOg� !//lames ! ?. C.ine, Jr. Assistant Civil Engineer bf cc: American National Design is { C , C FRANK FRANK L ESIN SKV OCUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT S.. Iln ' G_! Nan " LLOYD W. MICHAEL EARLE R: ANDERSON ROBERT NEUFELD VICTOR A. CHERRAK. JR.. P, ... d, 1 BEVERLY E. BRADEN December 13, 1982 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Availability of Water and Sewer Service for Tract No. 11734 Gentlemen The above mentioned property is entitled to water service • from this District, and said service is subject to pipe- line extension policies, rules, regulations and rate or- dinances of this District. Adecuate waterline and water storage capacity exists and will exist to serve the above referenced property at the time of occupancy. In addition, the sewer system capacity and the sewer treat- ment plant capacity will be sufficient to serve the above mentioned property at the time of occupancy. Yours truly, CU'CCAAMOONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NYC /Tl2EOg� !//lames ! ?. C.ine, Jr. Assistant Civil Engineer bf cc: American National Design is n u CITY OF RANCHO COCAMCNOA SUBDIVISION IMPRO'IELIENT AGREEMENT TRACT '10. 11734 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS; That this agreement is made and entered into in conformance with the Provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Cupertino Gardens Patio Homes, a California Partnership, by American National Corporation, General Partner, hereinafter referred to as the Subdivider. NIT:NESSETH: THAT, 6'NEPEAS, said Subdivider desires to subdivide certain real property in said City as shpi.n on the previously approved Tentative Map of Tract no, 11734; and, 11NEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be ret by said Subdivider as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract by said City; PIC4, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Subd'vider as fellc4S: 1. The Subdivider hereby ag ens to construct at Subdivider's expense all improe- v ments described on Panes p'- ereof within twelve :ninths from the effective date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Ccunci. of said rity aperov ine said Final Map and this agreement. This agreement sha be 'n default on the day following, the f`. rst anniversary date of said ac-, rese.l uni•us an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter oro- vidr.d. 3. The F .:divil -r may request an extension of time to complete the terns hereof. Such r e est snail be submitted to the City in writing not less than 60 days ro ber -t e expiration date hereof, and shall contain a state-ent of cirri::- stances n cessitating tte extension of time. The City shall have the right to revien the Provisions of this agree ^enf, including the construction stardards, Cost estnnate, and irpreverent security, and to r +quire adjust -ents therein if any substantfal chance has occurred during the term hereof. 4. If the S tdivfdor fails or neglect; to comply with the provisions of this agree -enq the City, Nall nave the "not at any time to cause said provisions to -Qt wful -ears, . :rd thereu. ^.en remover from the Subdivider anti /or his su'c :s the nfull cost and expense incurred. 5. Tho o rvis ^r shall provide m _rod water Sar Vice to each lot on said Tract in a1c ", C0 is • CNq regula :i nos, schedules, and fees of the Cecaranra County, 4,1r Gistnct. 6• "n ;r -•nL "In lir :aor shall file with the City Engineer, prior to c n" •�._nt of any work to to performed within the areas described by �. n ••rr tb tV,,ot si,ir -d by Subdi ... er, and each public utility cur „- .r•n ;,n :evnla. :J, to the effect that Subdivider has made the deposit 1' ' :;y r :ch nublic utility rorporation for the ccnenction of any 11 avl ail libl a vtrir ties to be suoTlied by such Corporatian within such sub - Ar.r,rvn. 7. T!, •, :a 11 •, pnnsihlo 'or ropl ace ^r, ot, roloeati in, or re-ov, of arry - of any 1 wIW nn uo:mr ...ten io Conflict with cnn;tmurt!gn of rr ^ ; ;: r•••I ;r-• •vr —ots to U:n s,itnf.,ctinn of tl:r f,i ty Cn ;r nr :er and the 1,,aer of n n ,.r rrr .Ir ton. • • IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT NO. 117 34 PAGE 2 8. Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvements Plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said mprovements are tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 5 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Subdivider shall also be responsible for construction of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. 9. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Subdivider from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise. or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Cecartments. Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. 10. The Subdivider shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said Tract resulting from development work relative to said Tract. 11. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion. 12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Subdivider after other improvement work, grading, and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provided by ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Devel- Pilact Director in all locations where the adjoining lot has been completely developed and built upon. Cu erti nn ders Patin Humps the Subdivider shall be re- maintaining a trees ited to good health until the end of the • guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later. 13. The Subdivider is responsible for meeting all conditions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City ordinances, and this agreement for the Tract, and for the maintenance of all improvements cenitructeE there- under until the Tract is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no it prover^nt security provided herewith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee bond here- inafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreerent together with the renuired improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the Subdivider herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has been release,]. 75. The improvements security to be furnished by the Subdivider with this agreement shall consist of the following, and shall be approved by the City Attorney: A. A faithful performance guarantee bond assuring completion by the Sub- divider of all conditions prerequisite to acceptance of the Tract by the City. R. A material and labor payment quarantee hond assuring payment in full by t Subdivider for all materials, services, equipment rentals, and labor fornlshnd to the Subdivider in the course of moctmg thr conditions of this agreerent. C. A C!,in dcooslt with the City to auarantoe ,a)ment by the Subdivider to the tract erg mnrr or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Tract Ilan for the section of all tract boundary, lot corner, and street center - lice monw,ts and for furnishing Ccnt,rl ire tln Intel to the City. The "31int of the derosit -ay be any amount certified by the tract engineer or suru•vnr as Acreptohlo pl yment in full', or, if no value is sut,ittell, the ctsh hand shall be as sho.n on the Construction and Fond estimate contained • hero in. V rd 0 IMPAO:E!IEIIT AGBEEME:lT TRACT NO. 1173? :ASE 3 Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as procedure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline r a notes and written assurance of payment in full from the tract engineer or surveyor. D. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set form on page 4 Of this agreement. 16. The Subdivider warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall be free fre, defects in materials and workranship. Any and all portions of the improvements found to be defective within one (1) year follnuving the data on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or re _laced by subdivider free of all chances to the City. The Subdivider shall furnish a maintenance guarantee bond in a sum equal to ten percent (10,) pf the con- struction estimate or S200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the fait -Sal perfor -ante of Subdivider's obligations as described in this paracrac'n. The maintenance guarantee bonds shall also secure the faithful performance 'v the Subdivider of any obligation of the Subdivider to do specified work •..it`, respect to any parkway maintenance assess, -ent district. On" the improents have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee bond has been accepted tv the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement ray be re- lease'] provided that Such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdiislon Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance. 17. That the Ceveloper shall take out and maintain, during the term of this agree- ment, such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him, and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this aenee-ent from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of t war:: or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations to byw himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or i Eire employe'] by said persons, even t1dpu0h such dacapes be not Caused by the negli- gence o` the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone e-ployed by said oe•sogs. The public liability and property damage insurance shall also direca/ protect the City, its officers, ,gents and employees, as well as the 0e ve toper, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state. The amounts of such insurance shall be as follm+s: A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death Ila- bility limits of not less than 5300,000 £or each person and SI,CC3,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than SI00,000 tar each accident or occurrence with an ap.-regate limit of S200,On,0 for claims which may arise from the operations of the Devel- oper in the performance of the work herein provided. B. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the ea-r- forrance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not toss than 5200,000 for each person and 5300.000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than Si0,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than v.h;Ch coy arise from the operations of the meveldper or his Contractor in performing the work.. provided for herein. 10. Thut hnfore the c,Cition of this agree -eilt, the mevel,h,r shall file wr[h the City a cormf.,to or certificates of imsmance covering the spew .fled insurancn. Each such Certificate shall bear in ondorsnment precluding the cancellatroms, or "j,t!un rn aver n ^.e of Inv policy evidences by such cert,fncat,, tela,, "i, earrntion of thirty (30) days after tie City shall have recei.'nd rptifica- tign by r— pitcrmi rail from the insurance carrier. r / ifn 7- 1173, As e'l.:e'zo 01 'Z" l!" n"" !] FA77i-jl_ Princiz,11 Surety: Developers Insurance Company Phase 11 Arrow Route Add,"S: P. 0. Be,, 1159 Phase III Vineyard Ave. - 547,000 Los Alamitos, CA 90720 Surety: Developers Insurance Company PI-asell, �-"ArIpRplll-e Address: Los Alamitos, CA pi�a'o 11 V 1 23. 90720 1 - Vineyard Ave. - A,e- z 58c CASH DITICS1.7 101I'VEW:%G 10%1 1"icalt as 1l10rm 0, lonstructior. and Sorij 7,tiate: 7, .r;o, Ln of the trot 1, .,o p�ity. . . . . . . . . . . ali ice.rrai—rnq w1i,, jj For-ilitll, re,.�,,-d b, 13, for', tn;l,, Cupertino Gardens Patio Homes, • a California Limited Partnership, rljt� by Corporation__ cc' .......... S� .......... ...... M'o n!' c'Wi,() i"C' ffig wre'..sye,.D. I' I I I I I I Iv, n— h AND TNUST 1 nn I. I ,, m, 1, -1 .... inli, I ,m In '., '2' , hmiedc,, n r--, ne n rnt '-1 1, 1, 1"1 r,,� n .1, 1 1— w, I, p I,, I I I I hr C E It th, r.l j 101'f ...... I, rrrm, li 11h, A VERY I M I IN �11111 r< "ri-ol .. it's w 5t�La� 4flWA� 1. - tel nF r Page 6 idr:acn to "Insoacr Cr': Col, •; fE DATE: AUcvst 13, 1932 FER.vt: ;0. Tract 11734 roaFCTED ,.f PG. ED;. File Reference Pha5e 11 (Arrow 4t.) Ctv Drnc vent :ePnx i[s, - CONST.^.L'CTID`; COST EST::L\TC l...v �.. \y...r_, '7T7 1 ..Il_ . 5 . :O::T:::r.E: Cc COSTS 5.31113 Tnr \I. CION .,. ^':TII ^I r0,i r; 58.a22.J ry I ..f FAIr'Ii"L . c!YA`:C is - - 0 ^. ^0 _ I:. ,::11 `5l l'111 \:. n11. I 9 27.5711."^ 1 pm T:. WT CTlIN r'.:: 2.95O.rd +.I... 111% 1(:10 IC I.1:1 1 78 L °0 - 119675 1 0. 2981:: I - I v 1 m,r HarrlcAaes ^p In R IIIO V TI !1/ : r 9prm I C1 I F 1 GCmrIVO I ^.1. fr ^^ 210 1 2. n05t 2 50.:'i 1 R. 1nn 2A^ R, B.P. �15or 0 1 L.F. G,,1 ]9n.r: 7V. Eaten Besr Nea' 5A. IPn!,' ^n 121 ) ' Local ': eu r ?ss my a' .a. 6ri0.dC t Junctmn ipr4C6:re - 3511J.JC 35UJ., 1 nt 2or3nl:e :o veez 694 5..F. 57) 3460. `u 1 CORS7RCCT1(H COS, t '3,111," :O::T:::r.E: Cc COSTS 5.31113 Tnr \I. CION .,. ^':TII ^I r0,i r; 58.a22.J ..f FAIr'Ii"L . c!YA`:C is cosE 1101) 49.n 0 ^. ^0 _ I:. ,::11 `5l l'111 \:. M!-I' I , 27.5711."^ pm T:. WT CTlIN r'.:: 2.95O.rd 111% 1(:10 IC I.1:1 r� U 1,9 • P�IgI, 7 CO1S7 :yC-ITO:; .%:;' FFI DATE: Aucust 13, 1982 PERIMIT Tldrt 11734 C -G -Zn- C.o!lPU7-D BY File Reference Phase III (ViI,ydrd Ave !:0 n, ,It all"I'll. COST EST-2,-,, CONSTWTCTJOT; COST S 42,577,00 CONTINUNCY COSTS 4.257 M TOrAL CQNSTF-CTIOB IOSTE 46,:934.)0 FMTN-FC I rltFll;NANI;! 11N!) (110,.) 47,000., IAIb'l ANTI t\Tr,1,11. Fl)•::, (soil 23 500 19 ll:•ilrCTION TM 2,351.1177 PT:l! LIZ 10 I lu 200.00 Irl t- CONSTWTCTJOT; COST S 42,577,00 CONTINUNCY COSTS 4.257 M TOrAL CQNSTF-CTIOB IOSTE 46,:934.)0 FMTN-FC I rltFll;NANI;! 11N!) (110,.) 47,000., IAIb'l ANTI t\Tr,1,11. Fl)•::, (soil 23 500 19 ll:•ilrCTION TM 2,351.1177 PT:l! • Gl 13Ct9 No. 10562: PPZ-lliH: $944.00 10 r.::. ion or the City c f Inache Cueo-cnGa St., t o .1 1 GcidD—�, PA7lc, 1; in. lb h.I.1 'n,e ;in ."O,ninz oho "t% prijal, i . Z, 2� to- i I I 11 rl )mn to certain des i noted ineprovomen is , ihi c.n said crtc - i t 1 19 __a3 , and identified as pro) Oct ei is h,r,b,. -,f ... 02 !a and r,,dy apart hereof; and, 1,11-:'E:5, said orinzi?al if required under the terms of said ogrce,ent to f.i-nj in a bona for zh, ffolzhinl porf.,mance of said agree.. tat. 30,, Tflr,:— :RE, 0 the principal and D EVfRpuS MMiPNC6 MRINY . as surety, are held and firm], bc,nd .It. the Cit. 11 :uo (horcIe.ftor call ,- On ' d " Cit Y") . is the 'Inol y of Fifty Nine TtImuseemal and no/i , Dollars (559, COMO--) la- fui .any of -Ea. uI,:,d States, for the pa,i,nt—.f hill, SUm vi aallulk., to be code, we bind Oo,,Ol,Os, an, bOI,s, succo5sors, exacatc,s and adIlai5tracons, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The cardit. ua of this obligation is such that if the ,be,, b... dcd prime imal, his or its heirs, ....... n,,, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and crovisions in the said agreement and anV alteration. thereof ma,ic as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the t i-e and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects accordinc to thin: t,ic intent and moaning, and shall indometf, and save hara loss Ciq , its officc-e - agents and ari'lovocs, as there,., ticulatiid. the. this .,oti.a boon. b,-, • null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and ct`ccz. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to III, face sononat specifi2d therefor, therm shall be included costs and roa50-..ilc cxpen-2s and fees, ibclju;sI reasonable attorney's fees. incurred by City in successful:% enforcing suci obligation, all to be axed is costs In,] included in a, jud, n Out rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees ihat ne, change, catertsion If ti-o' alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be per. formed 1hc.,ubd,, or the specifications accompanying the s..e shall in onty,, affect its bbliaticas or this head, and it does hereby waive notice or any sucl; Oh":,. of time, alt er at inn or addition to the Or., of the agreement fs or to the work or the V. NMESS r•'tf-,RM: thz, ins: -.nncnz i been duq excouttl by the principal and surety above nama", or —i'lOrch 24,h--, 19 83. C�I�ia. Gordon Poll,, ROme- P, RV: 71111-.1C—J NATIONV CORPORATION A t ta, 9, 1 C ede's idc.t In uel Al I 1,11 11 L.1 1- 11 hn - "', 'If "r—, ", Su"17- Att,,rnll lt.'Ieil Ittnrino Wynn . pothfor 10 IT It ry \ r 'r > rn CCA J uV iq r ` �hv r It rr n BILL, ±A. 10"10 -n PR`LlLVI I\M I.L:D i:RIAL Nl1D P s Jnnua y_25 - 33 11734, P,as2�. .rra+keu.c 112., _. r :.. ., -. ..1 nv OEV�LP.'f, LS IbS ro.A C`7P'bY . l:.,. - d•: it c: n' `'' 1 .7_erC 1`h3 '1"m sad F,,. hun4rM ano , IOC 29 500 Co - jo ... an.. .,. .: r..' h.' s. ... The :....5::: ¢.1 0: :i,,I!l s sl:cl: th'•t i` vhe .tbnvr h¢ln o ^d %:5 0 -IIC!: a, e - - 511c:es 5oi5 n 5na11 'n a:: t,tnt, ;- -d : c b'.', \nmlT. rrul': AevP a. - Tha c nOL p in [h: 5'e :,t I:mrc¢r:e- _ ni c: elr, r "r. 5 Oi :h0:: ^ Co he Aerr,rr r, - h 1 i o e crot 1' m. mo nM1mtos �IIRE MSUN..NCE '' _ -.. l IgwnS mwn.,. runmr .r, mrrn.r.n pl ; -r "' 1'fll \T \'nr LOS MQeleS nn March 21. 1 ?83 nrlrr rr>, au.,ury lore, .n nd Inr .ni sl .ic. rrp r E i rrr the rov IT. L—L,Id h,- T.IL — „. —,..I, h, vice 11 -0-..w Omnr ..rr•..Ydn,.o. m<n.nr r .n.1.n.>.rre o..4`Y e! n. e n ). " [ m t[ nal 12. Ya r —�- -- ”- 1 II tit' n [ n 'I O FI III -I AL . r,.l GI•TfI LZIMNE'JAPN �.rmv rn .,r...: . �, m�. u.x p. v.. ... �!� °n�f rwucr ev.0 .nro nn PORV' �. r..,nn.r. r,ha,.,. .�,l,l:.,rr;r1 Y- ...-n. me::mu�cn-rr 1 \111 \111 "1 :.l rail ,i:il i, i,d .. rl` rflJ It-L"", Y ,x rrlG tlJl/rn,,. Ir,,I r..le- 0........,.r�.l ". nAl L9,1981 r, MMUe me . \inm Vi.nln in ,ml x.r.,i,l r 11 nnrr 1111.rnr rr Y IITIII .Irl, r..n.mi.ume.I.n.I ,..vn. R1.......I lenN 11.\ \III( 11\\111! IvIl.n ... r.. I.. rm l n... ^1.n.'.rM J d .. rm. L-1 rl rrrrrr.r....r ....rte .... n rr.4 .dr,..,.r,r: e,r, .� BLND W. 1055:1 PPEvJU, : $752.:0 r• c::: ,::[;' of 6uncEo CucaronGa. Ste re of :al: fern:.. ❑PERTINO raP[yEt PATIO 1- NOVEEZ ' "n_ nave .n a : -u .u;o :n "•-ecoc.^.; (i:crctnaf :er aau :..._, '•r::✓..•.'.. ..,. pri - ,:>.: .- ic. :a [n d ,at ed impro'.emcntsa :• u.. m... January 34, Phase I Avenue end iden till vJ as prof ec :� Tract 11]34. Phase III- `/inepazd Avalon is Lc,ch': rcfc,-21 to and code a part hereof; and, li(=AS, said nri ra :val is required under the terns of said agreement to fur.ish a bond fur .a ua. perfa moron of said a emer.t. NCe, THE .,C- O.Zll, '..e the principal and ➢ RSIBPIxE �PANY e!d am fi m ly hound unto tnc Ciog c - .o Cae- a Ynercinafcers called °City "7, in the renal s of FOrtY �uen,'1'truw i andlyd300 poll.as f, 47,000.00 - - -" la.- ful a of ; Jm tea S; alts, for the o nert of which sur wilt a be ,ad,, i we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execrzars and ad,imis,ratos, jointly and severally, firnly by these presents. The condition of this abligation is uch that if the above bounded princ!ca :, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns. shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perfom the covenants. conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof none as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed a-, the tine and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects accurdine to their t--- intent and meaning, and shall indernifv and save hairless City, its officers, • agents and emolovees, as therein stimulated, then this obligation sell Dec one null and raid; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a mart of the oblitauon secured herebv and in addition to tie face amount specified therefor, there shall he included costs and reasonable e.m ansn and fees, incl.iuing iclsorahle attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcin: such ub li gnu on. all tm be taxed as costs and included in a y luy en. rendered, The surety herebv stipulates and agrees chat no change, extension of tine, i altemtion or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the wort to be per- foiled thereunder or the specifications acmrpanying the some shall in a a affect its obligations or this bond, and it does hereby' waive notice ofany such than m extension of tire, alteration or addition to the [es of the agreenent or tooth. work or the spec iotac ors. iN :alr:ESS nHf.REOP, thus Inatn:onnt has been duly executed by the principal and suroq' above maned, on Much 24th _ 11) 83 . Cupertino Carden Patio )knees__ NATIONAL NfE RICAN NATIONAL CORPORATION An.,rh se, .: ^:u yr:.; for As' t" r.. - - ,[[m chn4 e. 11y VicD_Rdpaiad (r:tM ,All —!, , r'.:[v r.0 dt rlu, rdVflllR4 RS INStWNfT C(FAAY Ant a:n^':. :atm ar : • — ��.drtrrno„ : raved t'. I4anfer 'l,) r' FIa.D W. 105621 -A PIWIILM: I.^CIlT.,1l • UWR & N/T[RIAI. MM • • . :.. for' ni':elnn o; c:v Ca. ai '.c n;;m uca- errnn, 5:.: [: o .,.. r:r17i -i G:alO PATIO FP;z,, ps.e:eci. -.: vr...nu:J n— v :oc ^,c r'.,1 "� n :,e��'. :r c: _.iota an p: inn pal - as a..J >.:cpiete ccrr:in des a :n +red i overtn[s.: +icz An id a ec -.ca :.. s• January 25 1987 . +ud i:.- ...;ficd as i p:.1cet Tract 11]34 Mae II -V'nov .d 4 en is bench; r.:... re.i to and am.- a part hereof; and, 1'.1!., —IS, raid nrinciaal is required ^.der the tcr-.5 of ssiG o;rccnent to furnish a beo_ .e. _.. labor 8 materials of said a.ec'ert. SOt, i, ERE'ORE. :,e the pri..,Ipal and � IIQCC FYI L AW as a to held and `, rata'b unto the C' Z; or " -'-o G :c :.canes '^ cuu ft cr callid "Li[r" in h[ emla sa^. of TwantY T TIC &d Five hladnei and ro /100 Dtiiars (<�3. 500. De0 - --j ful r : oUnited the c :a :a, the n -,ent of .."c:1 sun ::vll nau ; be made, v d Oar,nl a '.cs, o heirs, sac :essays, iteta:ora and ncci nisaeo[s, jointly and sevensil., fi :ni yby these presents. The condition of this obligation is 5tch that if the above bounded pr10ctpal, his or its heirs. executors, adednistrators, successors or asslgns, shall t all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly been and nerrai. the eovcnuits, c0nditioas and nrovisaons in the said scree-ere and am• alteration thereof -.zdt as therein provided, an his or their part, to be kept and Perfored at the tinn and in the tanner therein sreclficl. and in all r saects acre :d:aa to their c _- intent and meapipa, and shall iodc.arifv and save h.anmss li q', its off :cep, 2gonts and nnlovees, as therein atiaolated. [hen this eblv;ation shall bete null and void; other::ise, it shall be and ;chain In tall force and e...e.. Asa at, of the ebli4alic. s ared herchy and in addition ;o the fate aunt npecii:ac therefer, there shall be mciuded costs and reaser.able ea,iins :s fees, ine:.io:n; ronsciable nrtoraey's fees. incurred by City in s ceessfoliy enferclr.g suca cbll Sation, all to be cased as c.sls and ircladed in any jtd;,'t rendered. no surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, eatenaloa of tire. .iteration c: addition to tl.c term of the ayreement a to too nnrk to be per forded thprcandhr or the rio, -s acco:appnying the snne sSnll in a , *'ay affect its a iisatione or t1�i5t bond, and it aces herchy u.iivC notice of a v Sa;h <h. m:;a, estc.sam: of t! c, .][,,ration or addition to the tern's e: the 1,recnent or to the '...e. or the sp «:fieat:ons. 1:: tWir :E55 trill :nEOir, this Arse - at has 01. a c •cuted by the prince pnl and su :cry above na:::cd, on March 24th In Bl Ompert(n. Carden Part. R.mea Prise: n.,' OY; A.NERICAN NA9'lONAL pORPOMTION prat:, alit ..c rrfor ., a e:nLe re dv Vice Presidont U .1, 1 Attl'r" :, naP ,, .rr pi:r DEVf10P INSM!t1CF. ¢FIDN1Y ' n( II,....., n, A At �:rn o'p ,i,.:, ..,: r,:..,t •::acv MV1d C. panfcr • RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 11734 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 11734, consisting of a total planned residential development of 98 condominiums, submitted by American National Group, Subdivider, located at northwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: • 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and • ATTEST: 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon 0. Mi a s, Mayor • I lJ 10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Rick Marks, Associate Planner o c��tiir�y^ ie i n I9?' SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83 -02 - SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT - An amendment to Section 61.0217 of the Zoning Ordinance to include an overlay district containing various development incentives to producers of senior citizen oriented multi - family housing, as well as site development and general overlay district location criteria. ABSTRACT: This report contains revisions to a proposed Senior Housing Overlay District as required by the City Council at its March 2, 1983 meeting. The report also includes a recommeded set of Overlay District Administrative Guidelines and a recommended Standard Development Agreement to be entered into by the City and all potential developers interested in constructing housing for senior citizens under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District. BACKGROUND: On March 2, 1983 at its regularly scheduled meeting the City Council reviewed draft Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -02 creating a Senior Housing Overlay District for the City. After reviewing the proposed amendment and allowing public testimony, the City Council offered changes to the Overlay District, requested that staff incorporate them into the Ordinance and bring a revised Ordinance to the Council for its review on April 6, 1983. Additionally, the City Council felt that because the provisions of such an Ordinance were complicated and sensitive, particularly the section outlining and establishing Development Incentives, that a detailed set of Administrative Guidelines outlining the actual implementation process for the Overlay District also be brought to it for review and approval. As directed by the Council, staff brought a draft set of Administrative Guidelines to the Planning Commission on March 23, 1983. The Planning Commission reviewed the Guidelines, made several changes in wording and text, and recommended their approval by the Council. These changes have been incorporated into the draft set of Guidelines that is now before the City Council. While the Commission did not re- examine the Overlay District Ordinance on March 23, 1983, it did direct staff to inform the City Council that some of the Commissioners felt that in order to keep monthly rental costs in the "affordable range" senior citizen housing projects ought to be given priority processing by the City. �J Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -02 April 6, 1983 • Page 2 Senior Housing Overlay District (Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83_ -02): The changes in the Senior Housing Overlay District are as follows: Section 3 - Purposes - This section was shortened by eliminating item "a" and relettering the remaining policies. Section 4 - Target Population (Item "b ") - In order to more clearly define the income qualifications that potential project residents must meet, this section was revised to read as follows: "Individuals or married couples whose annual income from all sources is equal to or less than 80% of the current County median income as currently determined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development ". Section 6 - Development Incentives (Item "c ") - Fast Tracking Process - This item was eliminated from the Ordinance per City Council instructions; the remaining parts of the section were then relettered. Administrative Guidelines: The Senior Housing Overlay District • Administrative Guidelines were developed in order to provide information regarding application submittal requirements and to explain the process by which an application for senior citizen housing will be reviewed. They are designed to provide guidance early in the planning and design process for anybody interested in how the Overlay District actually works. The Guidelines consist of two (2) parts: (1) Project Submittal Requirements; and, (2) Project Maintenance Requirements. Additionally, an analysis of the submittal process is attached. This analysis reviews each step in the review process, its purpose, who participates in it, the time frame in which each step occurs, and includes general explanatory information. Development Agreement: The California Government Code, Sections 65864 througn ti5869.6 allows cities and project developers to enter into agreements in which each party to the agreement commits itself to specific items or conditions in return for other items or conditions. Attached for Council review is a proposed draft general Development Agreement the specifics Of which would vary from project -to- project subject to City Council _approval. The intent of this draft Development Agreementis to si—f od the City Council what such an agreement would contain and the kind of information that would be negotiated by staff with a potential Overlay District developer. • 76 Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -02 April 6, 1983 Page 3 The Development Agreement would run with the land and not the ownership of the project. Thus, the City's key concern - that all housing units constructed under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District remain available and affordable to the Overlay District's target population - is met. The key parts of the draft Development Agreement are items 12 through 18 inclusive. These sections deal with - Restrictions on rental units - Target population - Rents - Maintenance of apartments as rentals (no condominium conversions - per City Council instructions) - Annual Review - Tenant selection Next Steps: At its March 23 meeting, the Planning Commission instructed staff to develop for Commission and Council approval a standard City form for use in analyzing costs associated with senior citizen housing projects (see Administrative Guidelines, Project Submittal Requirements, Section A -1). This form is to be used by all applicants requesting the • award of development incentives outlined in the Overlay District. The form will allow the City to thoroughly analyze development costs, determine what incentives it wishes to grant a project and, over time, enable the City to develop a "track record" by which to compare costs from one project to another. Staff is in the process of developing a form and will bring it to the Planning Commission and City Council in the next few weeks. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends the following actions: A. That the City Council adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -02 creating a Senior Housing Overlay District. B. That the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Administrative Guidelines for the Senior Housing Overlay District. C. That staff be directed to develop a standard cost analysis form for determining costs associated with senior housing projects and development incentives to be awarded by the City and forward it to he Planning Commission and City Council as soon as possible. Respggtfujly ,,submitted, City planner /G:RM:jr Attachments ,�r, 0 SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT: ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES The Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines are designed to provide guidance and clarity to developers of low- and moderate- income senior citizen- oriented housing units, the public at large, and city staff. They state early in the planning and design process what the city is seeking and the information it will require. The guidelines consist of two parts - Project Submittal Requirements and Project Maintenance Requirements. Additionally, attached is an analysis of how the senior housing project submittal review process operates. This analysis and reviews each step in the review process, its purpose, who participates in it, and offers general explanatory information. The Project Submittal Requirements (Part I) can be broken into four parts. The first part is basically a detailed guide to the type of information that a developer interested in developing housing units under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District will be required to submit to the city. The • information required is patterned on the City's existing Planned Development (PD) process, but tailored to provide information regarding the special needs of low and moderate income senior citizens. The second part of the Submittal Requirements simply outlines the review that the information submitted will be given, and the findings required by the Planning Commission and City Council before the project can be approved. The third part consists of the basic criteria by which a developer may assess whether a parcel of land meets the essential locational requirements in order to adequately serve the Overlay District's target population. The final part of the Submittal Requirements provides guidance regarding the actual development of a project site. Part II of the Guidelines consists of the Project Maintenance Requirements. A long term maintenance plan will be required of all projects submitted under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District and, in order to insure compliance, a Maintenance Deposit must be posted or a Maintenance District created. The Administrative Guidelines should be followed in the management and operation of units constructed under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District. The Guidelines reflect the City's expectations at the time of project approval and were in part the reason for granting development incentives to developers of senior housing projects in the Senior Housing Overlay District. • 09 Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines Page 2 • I. PROJECT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A. Pre - Application Procedure Prior to submitting an application, the following procedures should be followed: 1. The project developer shall submit the following information in order for staff to determine project compliance with City requirements and policies for eligibility as a Senior Housing Overlay District. o Preliminary site plan (location; acreage; number /type of units) o Proposed dwelling unit density per acre o Elevations a Proposed rent schedules o Requested development incentives o Analysis of how proposed project can serve the target population as defined in the Senior Housing Overlay • District o Analysis of developer pro forma including land costs, construction costs, and financing costs. A detailed cost analysis (pro forma) must be submitted using the Standard City Project Cost Analysis form. This form will require detailed project analysis describing developer costs and projected rent schedules under two (2) development scenarios. The first scenario will assume no assistance (development incentives) from the City in developing the project; the second scenario will assume that the incentives requested from the City are granted. 2. Upon completion of their review, the Planning Division shall contact the developer to arrange preliminary consultations with the City Planner and other City offficials to discuss the information submitted and development incentives requested. D. Application 1. The applicant shall file with the Planning Division a complete Senior Housing Development package consisting of applications for: a. A total residential development It. Senior Housing Overlay District (Planned Development Zone Change request) C. Subdivision (where applicable) d. General Plan Amendment (if applicable) 0 `i Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines Page 3 • 2. An application for a SHOD shall constitute a zone change request. 3. A complete application shall include, but is not limited to the following: a. Uniform Application (Standard City form). b. Subdivision Application (where applicable) C. A Total Development Package in accordance with City guidelines, Development Plan, and other submittal requirements as listed on forms provided by the City. d. Part I of the Initial Study for environmental determination. e. Other information as may be deemed necessary by the City Planner, including financial information design and architectural details, and socio /economic data. 4. Upon receipt of an application, written notification shall immediately be sent to the applicant indicating whether or not the application is complete. If incomplete, a specific list of information necessary to complete the application shall be provided with this notice. It shall be the obligation of the applicant to provide all required information prior to the acceptance of t'ne • application. C. Development Plan. A Development Plan for a Planned Development shall include, at -a minimum, the following: 1. A boundary survey map of the property. A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the applicant proposes to subdivide the property. 2. A conceptual grading plan indicating existing and proposed topography of the property and adjacent land within 100 feet of the property, shown at contour intervals not to exceed two (2) feet. 3. A site utilization map indicating the gross land area of the development, the present district classification thereof, and the district classification and land use of adjacent land, including the location of structures, transit stops, and other improvements. 4. A site plan with at least the following details dimensioned and drawn to scale: a. Location of each existing and proposed structure in the development area, the use or uses to be contained therein, and the proposed dimensions and gross floor areas of each existing or proposed structure. • iA • Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines Page 4 It. All streets, curb cuts, driving lanes, parking areas, or other traffic circulation features within the site or affecting adjacent streets and properties. C. All pedestrian walks, malls, open spaces and landscaped areas. d. location and height of all walls, fences. e. Types of surfacing, such as paving, turfing or gravel to be used at various locations. f. A phasing plan if the project is to occur in increments. 5. Plans and elevations of buildings and structures sufficient to indicate the architectural style, construction standards, and type and color of materials to be used on building exteriors. 6. A conceptual landscape plan which meets the requirements of the City's Growth Management Ordinance. • 7. A written explanation of the proposed land use, site development, architectural guidelines, and performance standard regulations sufficient to govern use and development within the district in lieu of the applicable provisions of the base district or districts. 8. Such other information as may be required by the City Planner to permit complete analysis and appraisal of the development, and to facilitate approval of the development plan by the Planning Commission. D. Adoption of District and Development Plan 1. Upon acceptance of an application as complete, the project will be scheduled for Committee review by the City's Development Review Section. 2. Upon successful completion of Committee review, the project will be scheduled for the earliest scheduled Planning Commission agenda. 3. The Planning Commission shall hold concurrent public hearings on the development plan, Senior Housing Overlay District request (zone change), General Plan amendment, subdivision and development agreement. Upon completion of the public hearings, the Planning Commission shail adopt by resolution a recommendation for the City Council to approve or conditionally approve the project. a. The Planning Commission may alter the development plan subdivision or Development Agreement and impose such restrictions and conditions as it may deem necessary to Q� Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines Page 5 ensure that the project will be consistent with the intent and purposes of this section and with the adopted plans and policies of the City. It. The Planning Commission may, for any reason, send a plan back to the Design Review Committee for reexamination per Planning Commission instructions. 4. The City Council and Planning Commission shall make the following findings before recommending approval or conditional approval of a project: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the location of low and moderate income senior citizen- oriented housing in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. (b) That the proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment or adversely impact or affect surrounding properties. (c) That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. • (d) That the proposed zone change meets the location criteria put forward in Section H of the Senior Housing Overlay District. (e) That the proposed project meets the site development criteria put forward in Section I -2 of the Senior Housing Overlay District. (f) That without the granting of development incentives as agreed to in the Development Agreement the project could not be built. (g) If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the development plan, Senior Housing Overlay District (zone change), General Plan amendment, subdi•r sion,and Development Agreement, the City Council shall schedule a public hearing on the development plan, Senior Housing Overlay District (zone change), general plan amendment, subdivision, and Development Agreement for its earliest possible agenda. The City Council shall approve, modify or disapprove the zone change, General Plan amendment, development plan, subdivision, and development agreement. If the project is not approved, the City Council shall notify the applicant in writing of said • decision. An approved plan shall be considered as part of the ordinance approving the zone change. r 1 U Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines Page 6 E. Establishment of District. Each Senior Housing Overlay District estab ished sha— ll he indicated on the zoning map by the letters "SO" following a reference number identifying each separate base district (e.g. R- 3 /SO). The approved development plan, or the statement of general development objectives shall be considered to be a part of this ordinance, and shall be identified by reference to the corresponding designation of each specific Senior Housing Overlay District on the zoning map. F. Term of District. If within twenty -four (24) months after the City rezones the property Senior Housing Overlay District the final subdivision map is not approved and recorded, the Senior Housing Overlay District shall expire and the district classification of the project shall revert back to the previous base district designation. The City Council may grant a time extension, provided that at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date of the Senior Housing Overlay District a written request for extension stating the reasons therefore, shall be filed with the Planning Division. As a condition of the extension, the City Council may impose new conditions, revise existing conditions, or modify the development plan as it may find necessary, pursuant to public hearing requirements of the State Subdivision Nap Act. Any fees for processing an extension shall be discussed at that time. • G. Modifications. All development within this district shall comply with the deve opment pan as approved by the City Council. Any amendments to a development plan shall be submitted, reviewed, evaluated, and approved by the Planning Commission and /or the City Council. I H. Site Location Criteria. �Ulicability: The Senior Housing Overlay District requires the presence of certain conditions before it can be applied for or attached to a specific parcel of land. In order to adequately and satisfactorily serve the target population that this district has been created to serve, any proposed project site must demonstrate the following conditions and features: 1. Appropriate base district zoning. 2. Land uses in the immediate and surrounding area, current and projected, must be comnatible with the living environment required by senior citizens and must be free of health, safety, or noise problems (area generally quiet, especially at night, and free of noxious fumes). Y3 Senior Housing overlay District Administrative Guidelines Page 7 • 3. Area infrastructure must be in place or constructed as part of the project and capable of serving the proposed project including: o streets o sidewalks o traffic /pedestrian signals o drainage facilities 4. Proposed site topography must be fairly level and easily traversed by people of limited mobility. 5. Project site must be within walking distance of at least one of each of the following type commercial establishments and services: a, food shopping b. pharmacy C. bank d, public transportation (main or frequently served routes) 6. Proposed site should have convenient access to as many of the following as possible. a. public services (library, community center, service providers) It. professional services (medical, dental, legal) C. general commercial activities d. parks /recreational facilities. • Site Cove moment Criteria T, he City recogn ues the need to evaluate affordable senior citizen housing projects as unique developments serving a financially vulnerable and economically inflexible target population. Because the very nature of designing rental housing for this group requires the use of sites, siting techniques and building techniques that present special problems, and because providing affordable housing for senior citizens of low and moderate income is a high City priority, the City will not require proposed projects to meet specific minimum or maximum development guidelines. 1. All base district requirements governing items a -h below may be waived by the Planning Commission and /or the City Council provided public health, safety and welfare are not threatened: a. lot area, .vidth, or depth b, front, rear, or side yards c. building height or setbacks d. lot coverage P. dwelling unit size f. on -site parking g, open space h. space between buildings • g11 Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines Page 3 n I Prospective developers of projects are advised to consult with City staff prior to development or submittal of any plans in order to determine the City's 'experience and expectations regarding affordable senior citizen housing projects. 2. In general, projects processed under the Senior Housing Overlay District will be evaluated according to the following performance criteria: a. affordability of dwelling units produced (priced to meet intone requirements of target population as defined in SHOD Ordinance). b. overall ability of project to serve target population (design, location, amenities provided) C. impact on immediate and surrounding land uses (current and projected) d. design compatibility with immediate area (architectural style; landscaping; street frontage; color schemes, building materials) e. On -site lighting (common areas, walkways, parking areas, • frontage) F. site perimeter planning (to provide protection for the project and surrounding uses from adversely impacting each other; use of buffering techiiques; gateways where appropriate; integration of site with area where appropriate) g. use of design techniques that afford project residents the opportunity to intermingle on both a formal and an informal basis (internal walkway systems; gazebos; shaded sitting area; covered patios). h. use of safety materials in project design (skid- resistant materials in sidewalks, patio areas, outside stairs; handrails on stairs or paved grades; bathroom safety features). 1. practicality of site design for mobility limited or non- ambulatory_pfople (curb cuts; wheel 'chair ramps; avoidance of grades in common areas, elevators). j. design of pedestrian safety features at vehicle /pedestrian interface points (clearly marked walkways, use of pedestrian signs, well lighted walkways, transit passenger waiting areas) k. design of vehicle ingress and egress to and from project site (traffic signals, turning lanes, bus acceleration /deceleration lanes, bus pull -in areas) J� Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines Page 9 parking area design and layout (integration and masking of trash • collection area, proximity to dwelling units, use of landscaping) J. General Provisions The genera provisions of the base district shall apply, unless specifically changed by this chapter or as modified by a development plan or conditions of approval. K. Performance Standards In addition to the performance criteria of the SHOD, the performance standards of the base district shall apply, unless specifically changed by this chapter or as modified by a development plan or conditions of approval. L. Design Guidelines The design guidelines of the base district shall be applicable to all projects whenever possible, unless specifically changed by this chapter or as modified by a development plan or conditions of approval. I1. PROJECT MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS Project develcoers should be prepared to demonstrate to the City how they • intend to maintain the project over the long term (landscaping, buildings, parking areas, walkways, etc.). Approval by the City of a long term maintenance plan will be a standard condition of approval in all projects developed under the Senior Housing Overlay District. In order to insure that project maintenance is in accordance with the maintenance plan approved by the City a maintenance deposit or other legal security deposit, acceptable to the City, shall be required. In lieu of a deposit, a Landscape Maintenance District may be set up in accordance with State law and City policy. Project Mainatenance Plans should, at a minimum, provide details regarding work to be performed and approximate maintenance schedules for the following routine maintenance items: o Painting or staining of buildings (dwellings, recreation, other) o Landscaping (trimming, replacement) o Resurfacing /restriping of driveways and parking areas o Roof o 'Walkways o Common areas, covered patios, outdoor furniture o Lighting o Pools, spas, saunas 0 Recreation Buildings • S SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT PROJECT SUBMITTAL REVIEW PROCESS The follo.aing is an outline of how the senior housing project submittal review process operates. This analysis reviews each step in the review process, who participates in it and generally explains the purpose of each step. Step 1: First pre - application conference Purpose: Explanation of Senior Housing Overlay District —`— - development process - incentives possible - development agreement Explanation of proposed project (project developer) Parti ripan ts: Planning Division Staff Project Developer Tine Frame: One meeting • General Comments: The purpose of this step in the process is simply to provide an opportunity for the project developer and staff to become familiar with each other, to give staff an opportunity to explain the workings and contents of the Senior Housing Overlay District, and to give the developer a chance to explain the size, nature and scope of the proposed development. 19 Step 2: Pre - application submittal Pur ose: Provide basic project information for staff to review in order to determine project adequacy; development incentives to recommend that City offer via development agreement (basic feedback to developer) Participants: Community Development Staff (Planning, Engineering, Building) Senior Citizens Municipal Service Providers (Sheriff, Fire, Sewer, Water) Project Developer Timp. Fr•ime: Two (2) weeks Vii! Senior Housing Overlay District Project Submittal Review Process Page 2 Irk L A General Comp nts: Steo 3: Purpose: Participants: Time Frame: Based upon staff input at the first pre - application conference, the project developer will submit basic project information (site plan, elevations, rent schedule, etc.) to staff so that staff may review it, determine whether it meets City criteria for obtaining development incentives and to give the developer a response to the project early in the development process. Second pre - application conference Provide staff response to development proposal, indicate development incentives staff will recommend that City award developer; provide developer an opportunity to review staff's comments. Planning Division staff Project Developer One meeting General Conments: Based on the discussion at this meeting, a developer will know what staff's recommendations regarding the project and development incentives are and will indicate to staff if they are acceptable or not. If they are, the process continues to the next step; if they are not, staff will meet again with the developer to try to reach an agreement. Steo 4: Staff Report /Recommendations to City Council Purpose: Report to the City Council the nature and scope of the proposed project, recommend development incentives that the City consider granting the developer and recommend appropriate provisions for a development agreement. Participants: City council Planning Division Staff Project Developer Time Fr -:me: Determined by City Council /City Clerk General Comments: At this point in the process, the City Council will have basic information defining the project, where it is to be located, what incentives the developer requires in order to make the project feasible and staff comments on the project, development incentives, • and development agreement. At this point, the City Council must indicate whether or not it agrees with rP Senior Housing Overlay District Project Submittal Review Process Page 3 staff recommendations and whether staff should proceed p with preparing a Development Agreement, Steo 5: Submit project application (per requirements of Senior Housing Overlay District) Purpose: Begin processing Participants: Usual staff and outside agencies involved in Design and Growth Management Review. Time Frame: Normal Development /Design Review scheduling General Comments: Projects that have reached this point in the submittal and review process will have been developed with the benefit of many hours of staff review and comment and should not require significant revision. Step 6: Design Review Growth Management Review • Par?ose: Usual determinations of ability of service providers to service project (Growth Management Review) and resolution of design problems /issues (Design Review) Participants: Design Review Committee Growth Management Review Committee Project Developer Time Frnm_ Normal Growth Management Review Schedule General Comments: If the City Council or Planning Commission desire, special unscheduled meetings of committees may be called. Step 7: Development Agreement PuronLL so: To orovide assurances to both the project developer and the City that incentives offered and agreements made are kept. Pa r t is ipan t6: Planning Division Staff City Attorney Project Developer Timm. Franc: One meeting p Senior Housing Overlay District Project Submittal Review Process Page 4 J General Comments: In order to provide assurances to both a developer and a city regarding the processing, density, site requirements, and any conditions, terms or restrictions originally agreed to will in fact materialize and endure, the California Government Code (Sections 65864 - 65869.5) establishes that Development Agreements may be entered into, the provisions of which become legally binding to both parties and all successors in interest to parties to the agreement. Step 8: Planning Commission Public Hearing: Project; Overlay' District; and Proposed Development Agreement Purpose: Review project for consistency with the City development policies and SHOD policies Participants: City Planning Commission City Staff Project Developer If the Planning Commission fails to approve the project, adjustments will be • made in the processing schedule at that time per Planning Commission instructions. If the Planning Commission approves the project, overlay district, and development agreement: Step 9: City Council Public Hearing: Project; Overlay District; and, Development Agreement Participants: Planning Division Staff City Attorney Project Developer General Comments: Based upon this review, the project overlay district will be approved and the development agreement signed by the Mayor on behalf of the City. If the City Council fails to approve the project, adjustments will be made in the processing schedule per City Council instructions. If City Council approves project: Proceed To: Map Recordation • Plan Check Etc. ��m • * * **. Excerpt from Planning Commission Minutes March 23, 1983 J. SENIOR OVF.RLaY DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDELINES Rick Narks, Associate Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner 'dc Niel asked if there was a reason why lighting was not mentioned in item 4 under Development Plans of the Administrative Guidelines. Mr. Gomez replied that lighting was covered under landscape requirements and part of the landscape plans; however, if the Commission desired lighting requirements to be made more explicit, they could also include it under the architectural criteria. Commissioner Stout pointed out that lighting was covered under the Site Development Criteria section of the Guidelines. Co =issioner 3arker stated that item 5 on page 7 under Site Location Criteria should be amended to read I. . . at least one of each of the following types of commercial establishments and services ". Co ^missioner Stout suggested that future projects be required to delineate the number of dwelling units per acre. Further, that a break down should also be • submitted '•which would shay the project with and without the density bonuses /incentives. This .could enable the Commission to see exactly what kind of 'urea< the senior citizens are actually getting in regards to rental rates. Mr. Marks replied that staff is requiring that this be done under a project pro forma which ,would show the project with and without incentives. Commissioner Stout replied that he did not see where this was done. Mr. Marks replied that it had not been spelled out, however, under project pro forma this was the Intention. He asked if the Commission wished to have this spelled out. Commissioner Stout replied that he would like the language modified so that this point is made clear. He further stated that it should be noted on the plans where the nearest tr ansoortation services Are located and if they are not within a 'now the senior citizen will get to those facilities. commissioner Stout s1q,39 stod that item I -2a under Site Development Criteria provide some type of ^bjrctive criteria for the amount of rent reduction. Ted Hopson, Assistant. City 4t.torney, replied that the objectivity comes in the definition of target pop:Jlatinn, lie explained that target population is defined as person; ov ^r i r.irtain ale who fall within income guidelines .which are shifting g'!!iidelines ,,t by HUD under their Section 8 program. 01 1 Commissioner Stout stated that his point was that if the rents cannot be • reduced enough to fit them to the target population, the City is wasting its time. Therefore, there should be some type of comparison as to what the target population is, the rent being proposed, and whether the project is meeting it or not. Rick Marks replied that one of the requirements of the City Council was that staff define the target population in greater detail and also the rents. He explained that the rents as now written must be affordable to persons earning less than 800 of the county median and the people would not have to pay more than 30:6 of their income. Commissioner Stout asked if this median was determined by the Bureau of Census. Mr. Marks replied that the figure was determined periodically by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Commissioner Stout asked if a reference could then be made to some specific figure. Rick Gomez replied that we do have a reference point through the county and through HUD. Commissioner Stout replied that he just wanted to make sure that there is a reference to consult to determine the current median figures. He asked if there was a definition in the guidelines as to the age of the target • population. Mr. Marks explained that in the Overlay District the target population is defined as persons 65 or older who meet the income criteria. Commissioner Barker supported Commissioner Stout's request that a comparison be provided so that it would be clearer to the Commission that their objectives were being met. He asked if something could be done so that the curb cuts would not become drainage funnels for water. Mr. fomez replied that drainage would be handled through other types of facilities and that this could be lonked into further in senior citizen projects. Commissioner Barker asked if the waiving of building heights would have to come before the Commission. Mr. Gomez replied that it ',would. Commissioner Stout asked if our ordinance requires elevators in projects of three or more stories. Mr. Gomez replied that ,while mar ordinances do not contain elevator requirement;, it could possibly be part of the Building Coda requirements. Comnissiomrr Stout stated t,aat this should be required that a senior project of three or, more stories contain an elevator. n �. • Jack Lam stated that there is a Building Code requirement that once occupancy exceeds a certain height, elevators are required. He suggested that staff could examine the Building Code to determine if this requirement alreacy exists. If it does, there is no need to make it part of this ordinance; ho.aever, if it doesn't the Commission could direct staff to include that language. Chairman Rempel suggested that the requirement for a performance bond for a long -term maintenance plan be replaced with a cash deposit for the City's use should the project not be properly maintained since a performance bond has to be renewed every year and is not a good application for a long -term maintenance plan. 4r. Gomez asked the City Attorney if this would be similar to a landscaping district in that the developer 'would be required to put up some type of cash bond to cover maintenance cost during the first year. Mr. Hopson replied that this would probably be done through the development agreement which would require the posting of a certificate of deposit or some other type of medium satisfactory to the city that would guarantee performance. Chairman 3e. Opel referred to item I section A -1, Pre - Application Procedures, and suggested that the requirement for expected profit margin be omitted. • I.1r. Gomez exolained that this was included because it was considered a stanoarg asooct of the pro forma. Further, that because of the incentives beinn nor ?eu into the project, it was determined important to include this require -enc to determine that the incentives were being put back into the project and not used to increase the developer's profit. Chairman Rempel replied that a false reading would be obtained because_ the cost would be hidden elsewhere. lie suggested that it would be better to know the total cost, put that into the project, divide it up among the units, and then know the total price per unit. Commissioner Barker asked if Commissioner Stout's previous suggestion for a test analysis would fulfill the need for determining this. Nr. Gomez replied Commissioner Stout's concern with the rental rates and the target population would overlap this objective hecause what is trying to be acc ^.iplished is the issnrinr.e that the incentives are equitably divided in the project and not going back into the developer's pot '.:et. Mr. ear', <s e.xpl,ained that Luis type of requira -nent is not unique to this city and has b-2-2n s_ ^d in many cities and redevelopment agencies. Further, that it .gas agreed Lnat the profit figures •would not be 100fo precise, but from staff's point of view was a means to tnrnet what could be hundreds of thousands of dollirs .north of incentives and determining what is a reasonable level of profit given that you want curtain types of improvements or incentives at the as site. A1,o, that it is difficult when the profit margin is not known to know w'netln,r the developer really needs all the incentives they are requesting, "5� Chairman Rempel replied that the developer would not give an accurate profit • margin and would say that he would not be making much profit, therefore, needed all the incentives. Commissioner Stout suggested that a detailed cost analysis be provided showing the project with and withoat incentives. He also suggested the possibility of requiring the use of an independent person to provide this information. Commissioner Barker asked why the 100 foot figure was used in Item C 3. Chairman Rempel stated that he thought it should just read adjacent land and the reference "within 100 feet" should be eliminated. Coy. issioner Stout stated that a possibility would be to require a site utilization map of sufficient size to show what is going on with adjacent land and to also show the requirements added before regarding the location of service establishments_ Chairman Rempel stated that item I, Site Development Criteria, section 2 "i ", should include elevators. He then asked for discussion en the Project Submittal Review Process. Chairman Rempel stated he would like to see a time line establishing how long it would take to get through each phase. Commissioner Stout asked ho.v mach time would be saved in fast tracking a senior project as opposed in he usual process. • Rick Parks reolied that staff was informed by the City Council at their last meeting that the term "fast tracking" should not be included in the ordinance at this time. Mr. Hopson stated there are some built in statutory time saving devices which could be used. jack Lam, Cos,-unity Development Director, explained that special attention could be given to a project if necessary to expedite it through the various phases. Commissioner Stout stated that since the Commission is an advisory body, he still felt that some language should be included regarding priority processing. He suggested that the term "fast tracking" could be eliminated and replaced with language concerning the use of short cuts provided by law. Chairman Rempel agroed and stated that was one of the reasons he was reqP;esting a propose.9 time line. Rick Gomez r?pli=d that it would roughly be a sixty day time frame. Further, that tills time line had boon part of the project submittal review process but the ref�r•tncs had bean removed. However, this could be put back in at the C3tVpisSion's )irection. (7)1 • • Commissioner Stout asked if a project of this nature would require a school impaction letter. Jack Lam reviewed a section of the Municipal Code which stated that government subsidized senior citizen projects are ex=empt under the Growth Management Plan and that the question would be what would constitute a government subsidized project. Further, the City has letters authorizing the waiver of school fees for senior projects provided that the controls exist that ensure the project stay a senior project. Mr. Hopson replied that he did not see why the term government subsidized was used since senior citizen projects should categorically be exempt and not just those built under redevelopment or Section 8. Commissioner Mc Niel asked what course of action could be taken if one of the senior citizens had a child left permanently in their care. Ted Hopson replied that this situation would be controlled through the development agreement. He further explained that the legality of a project for senior citizens could be defended on the basis of the reduction of the size of the units, the reduction in the amount of parking spaces, the addition of ramps and elevators, and structured recreational amenities around senior citizens. 'Or. Lam stated that if subsidized could be interpreted to also include • development agree =eats, the projects would then be deemed exempt. Mr. Hopson repli=ed that the City Council would probably have intended that interpretation had the development agreement concept been available 'when that section of the code was written. Chairman Rempel stated that he would like to see substantiation for the large reduction in parking. Ir. Lam stated that the general standards for parking in most cities is .5 which is a fairly common standard. Also, further information could be provided from the American Planning Association supporting this figure. Mr. Gomez replied that staff's analysis showed that the parking requirements of .5 per unit were adequate. Further, there was also a study done by a traffic engineer for the Calmark Corporation which :could be available for the Commission's review. Melton Bond, Ranrho Cucanongn resident, asked permission to address tha Commission and suggested that some means to provide foster care for children left in the rare of senior citizens should be explored before having then evicted from their apartment. Chairman R•�mpel advis ed that the senior citizen would know Neat children are not permi tted when they rant an apartment. Also, they would have a w'ni le to find puler means of housing for a child before the owner would evict them. 9l Mr. Gomez explained that the concern was that the senior citizen apartments • would be converted into family apartments and that a reasonable amount of time would be given should this situation arise. _ Flr. Gomez stated that staff was requesting a recommendation or consensus of approval to riodify these guidelines per the concerns expressed this evening and forward them to the City Council for their consideration on April 6, 1983. Commissioner McNiel stated that he felt the amendments made this evening were substantial enough that the Commission should review them at their next meeting before forwarding them to the Council. Ted Hopson explained that the reason the Council requested the guidelines at the April 6 meeting was because the Senior Overlay Ordinance must be adopted which specifically authorizes the acceptance of senior projects and development agreements. Chairman Renoel stated that these recommendations could be forwarded to the Council, however would still like to see the guidelines come back to the Commission at the next meeting. Mr. Gomez reolied that staff could bring the guidelines back at the next meeting along with the ordinance and what action the Council had taken. Chairman Rempel asked Councilman Jim Frost if he had gotten any direction from what the Comnission had said this evening. Councilman Frost stated that he heard general brainstorming this evening but • not a y .sensus from the Commission. However, did not see a problem with a lilt nF the ;Onmissioner's concerns. Commissioner Idc Niel stated that if the Commission forwards this item on to the Council. it is a recommendation. Rick Marks stated that the Commission could forward the guidelines to the Council with a recommendation that their concerns be incorporated into the final version. Rick Gomez stated that from the views exchanged this evening it did not seem that the Planning Commission had any grave concerns with the guidelines and that with corrective language the concerns could be corrected. He suggested that Pick A:r' <s go through item -by -item to try to help the Commissioners reach a consensus. Mr. Marks reiterated the concerns expressed by Commissioner McNiel in that lighting be covered somewhere in the submittal. Ch- airnin Reaoel replied that this item is Covered on page 8. It was the consen;us of the Co- Imission that this concern had already been addressed and necrlod no firt'ner attention. I4r. 'dar'Is reiterated the concern of Commissioner Stout that the density per • acre co otl I l ont in -ldv ante. 'here was a consensus that this item be ineluried in the 1uid ^lines, V, • Mr. Marks stated that the Commission desired a project pro forma which .could include information with and without development incentives. Commissioner Stout stated that the details should he spelled out more in that it should be a cost analysis prepared by an independent person who is an expert in that area. Commissioner Mc9iel advised that there are estimators who do that type of work within every major company. Mr. Marks stated that this this added procedure could also raise the rents on a project as staff had been informed that each time a step is added, it increases the rent. Mr. Hopson advised that this also extends the time period. Commissioner Stout stated that this is the one item that would show how the senior citizen would be saving money and felt very strongly that this should be a requirement. Chairman Repel stated that it would not be that difficult for a cost analysis to be done on the units. Mr. Gomaz stated that the numbers could be verified but the difficulty would • be in the area oP profit margins and overhead costs. However, staff would be able to review the pro formas. 2 Commissioner Stcut suggested that a standard format be established to compare the projects. Mr. Lam stated that it would not be difficult to prepare a cost model and that City staff would 'know what to look for to make certain that the benefits are going to the renters and not into the pocket of the developer, Commissioner Sto:it asked if a form could be developed for the developer to fill out so that projects would be similarly figured. Mr. Gomez replied that a standardized form could be developed, Commissioner Stout stated that he would be satisfied with that. Mr. ?larks stated that the next point of discussion was the location of transit stops and how a senior citizen would get to them. Mr. Gomez replied that this could be covered under the site utilization criteria to inc:odo such things as major transporation location. qrl Commissioner Stout asked if the locations would be reviewed by staff at the time of initial submittal and if the locations were not close, how the • developer would mitigate the problem of getting senior citizens to these _ services. Mr. Gomez replied that it would be reviewed at that time. Mr. Hopson advised that under the criteria being established, a project must be within walking distance to transporation services so a developer could not mitigate the location problem by providing transportation to the major transportation locations. Mr. Marks reiterated the concern that curb cuts on -site be designed to not add to or cause flooding problems. There was a consensus of the Commission that this item be included. The next item of concern was that performance bonds not be used and substituted with a long -term maintenance deposit. Ted Hopson stated that this requirement might be broadened to include maintenance deposits, certificates of deposit, or possibly a deed of trust. Mr. Gomez stated that the objective was to get away from the requirement of the performance bond and possibly the details could be worked out in the development agreement with the help of the City Attorney. Commissioner Stout suggested that the wording could be changed to read "legally acceptable securities ". • Mr. Mar'xs stated that the next item of concern was that some discussion of priority processing 'ue included and also the inclusion of time lines in the project submittal process. Mr. Gomez replied that this information is available and if the Commission desired, could be put back in. Chairman Remoel stated that he was not asking for fast tracking; however, would like to see a time frame established so that it would be known approximately how long it .could take a project to go through each of toe phases. Commissioner Stout stated that he thought there should be some type of priority processing. Chairman Rempel stetnd that item 5 on page 7 needed to be amended to read "each of one of the following'. Mr. Gomez stated it there was a problem regarding priority processing, the language night be included that would outline the statutory provisions availab Le in order to process through the General Plan process to explain this more clearly. Commissioner Stout stated that he would prefer to see this language added. • Commissioner Stout stated that there was also the issue in the site utilization criteria, item 3 C, and that the specific amount of feet referred to be eliminated and replaced with the wording "adjacent properties" along . with the inclusion of the location of the amenities. Also discussed was the problem of children being placed in the care of a senior citizen and how this issue would be handled. It was the consensus of the Commission that this be added. Mr. Marks stated that the next item of discussion regarded the parking standards and the desire to have this further researched. Commissioner Stout stated that he was personally in concurrence with the parking requirements. Mr. lam stated that possibly the question was not one meant to change the requirement, but rather one requesting more supportive material be supplied to the Commission to substantiate the parking figures. Mr. Gomez replied that the parking requirement would never go less than the .5 figure established in the ordinance and that staff would review each project on a case -by -case basis to determine the appropriate number. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by McNiel, unanimously carried, to forward the Guidelines to the City Council with the above stated amendments. • AYES: CCII.MI SSIONERS: Stout, McNiel, Barker, Juarez, Rempel NOES: CO >1MISSIO;iERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None n IL -A l� • z ORDINANCE N0. * ' �� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0217 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE CREATING A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 61.0217 of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: SECTION 2: Definitions: The Senior Housing Overlay District is a floating district that requires certain conditions before it can be attached to a specific parcel of land and as such is not given a specific location until a developer applies for it. As a combination Planned Development and Overlay District, it is intended to include development review, zoning, and subdivision, all of which shall be conducted simultaneously with required public hearings. SECTION 3: Purposes: It is the overall purpose of the Senior Housing Overlay District to carry out the following policies of the City's General Plan with respect toward Senior Citizens. ' • a. The City shall promote programs which meet the special housing needs of the elderly, handicapped, and ninority groups (pp. 15 & 88). 19 b. The City should encourage a balanced supply of rental and ownership housing affordable to low- and moderate- income households (p. 78). C. The City shall implement programs which assist low - and moderate - income families, the elderly, handicapped persons, large families, and minorities in renting and buying existing housing (p. 83). d. The City shall investigate the feasibility for special criteria to provide reduced parking requirements for new housing protects. If found feasible, the policy would provide for reduced on- site costs for developers of elderly housing resulting in lower unit cost (p. 89). The Senior Housing Overlay District is intended to facilitate the construction of affordable rental housing units that will serve the current and long torn City need for affordable senior citizen oriented dwelling units while maintaining a high degree of quality in project design and construction. ) lin Ordinance No. Page 2 E The District is further intended, by offering various development incentives, to make the development of senior citizen oriented affordable units attractive to potent -ial developers while at the same time providing assurances to the City that units developed by use of the incentives offered as part of the Overlay District, remain available and affordable to the target group intended - senior citizens of low and moderate incomes. SECTION 4: Target Population: The primary resident population group that is intended to be served by the units constructed through use of incentives offered as part of the Senior Housing Overlay District are senior citizens who meet both of the following criteria: a. 1. Married couples - head of household age 55 years or older. 2. Individuals - age 55 years or older. b. Individuals or married couples whose annual income from all sources is equal to or less than 80% of the County median income as currently determined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. SECTION 5: Applicability: The Senior Housing Overlay District • requires the presence of certain conditions before it can be applied for or attached to a specific parcel of land. In order to adequately and satisfactorily serve the target population that this District has been created to serve, any proposed project site must demonstrate the following conditions and features: a. Appropriate base district zoning. b. Land uses in the immediate and surrounding area, current and projected, must be compatible with the living environment required by senior citizens and must be free of health, safety, or noise problems (i.e. area generally quiet). C. Area infrastructure must be in place or constructed as part of the project and capable of serving the proposed project including: streets sidewalks traffic /pedestrian signals d. Proposed site topography must be fairly level and easily traversed by persons of limited mobility. • 101 • Ordinance Ho. Page 3 e. Proposed site must demonstrate close proximity to commercial establishments, service providers, and other amenities'including: - food shopping - drug stores - banks - medical and dental facilities - public transit (main or frequently served routes) - open space /recreational facilities SECTIMI 6: Development Incentives: In order to reduce development costs associated with the construction of housing oriented toward senior citizens of low and moderate income, the city is prepared to offer a developer some or all of the following incentives, depending upon the quality, size, nature, and scope of the project proposed. a. Reduction In Required On -Site Parking: The current city standard for on -site parking in multiple family projects is 2.2 parking spaces per dwelling unit with one space per dwelling unit being a covered carport or garage. The City will grant a reduction in • required on -site parking down to a minimum ratio of .5 non - covered parking spaces per unit. I- Dwelling Unit Oen sity Bonus: In order to maximize net yield per acre, the city will consider increasing the allowable project density by either granting a M density bonus to the project site's exisiting density category (per California Government Code Section 65915), or by granting a request for a change in density range (per the City's General Plan), or both depending upon the quality, size, nature, and scope of the project. c. Fee 'daivers /Reductions: Projects submitted under the Senior Housing Overlay District may receive, depending upon their size, nature, and scope, a reduction or waiver of some or all City imoospd development submittal and processing fees. Sucn reductions of waivers may affect the following fee schedule: - Planned Development /Project Submittal Fees - Park Fees - School Fees (when applicable) - Other fees (where applicable) () Ordinance No. Page 4 • Fee reductions or waivers are subject to negotiation between the City and the project developer and will be granted based upon that amount of reduction or waiver necessary to place per unit monthly rental costs in the range affordable to the target population. SECTION 7: City /Developer Agreement Regarding Long Term Affordability of Units: Development incentives granted by the City to a developer using the Senior Housing Overlay District are predicated upon the long term availability and aff6rdability of the units for the target population previously defined. In order to insure that the units remain available and affordable to this group, the developer will be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City per California Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5. SECTION 8: The City shall establish a process and such administrative guidelines as it shall deem necessary in order to implement the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District. SECTION 9: The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on February 23, 1983 for Environmental Assessment 83 -02 and found that it will not create any adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on April 6, 1983. • SECTION 9: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Reoort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren f. '.Ja sse elan, CiTy clerk Jon D. Ii ikels, Mayor %li RESOLUTION 110. * Z - 1'1 � • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that creating a Senior Housing Overlay District containing development incentives will encourage the production of affordable senior citizen oriented housing within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has further determined that in order to implement the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District and provide clarity to developers of senior housing a detailed set of guidelines is required; and WHEREAS, the Administrative Guidelines outline and explain both the project submittal requirements and project review process in detail. NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves and adopts the Senior Housing Overlay District Administrative Guidelines. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983, AYES: • NOES; E ABSE NT: Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Y.z /,1 L/ I • • P DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SJBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT April 6, 1983 Members of the City Council and City Manager Rick Gomez, City Planner CkCAaJot _ L Z Ia" Rick Marks, Associate Planner SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: FOR INFORMATION ONLY - NO ACTION REp RED ABSTRACT: This informational report contains a sample Development Agreement which is to be approved by the City Council in conjunction with senior citizen housing projects developed under the provisions of the Senior Overlay District. Attached also for Council review is a project cost analysis (pro forma) submitted by Ca lmark Development Corortion analysis will `obe used ed ine shaping HarDeve c lopment Agreement between the City and Calmark. BACKGROUND: On March 2, 1983, the City Council reviewed Zoning Ordinance Amendment 33 -02 creating a Senior Housing Overlay District in the City. The Council preared so lemental information relative Amendment ethe new instructed staff to prep PP Overlay District including a draft Development Agreement. Staff was further instructed to bring the supplemental information to the City Council on April 6, 1983 for its review and approval. Development Agreements - Points of Authority: The California Government Code (Sections 65864- 65869.5) allows cities to enter into agreements with developers, the contents of which shall specify the duration of the agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public dagreement shall be enforceable by Code any part the es that a thereto. Relationship to Senior Housing Overlay District: one of the key concerns that the City has regarding the Overlay District is that of protecting the long -term availability of the units for the target population and insuring that rents charged are affordable to that population group. Development Agreements, provide a vehicle by which the City can make the production of affordable senior citizen oriented housing attractive to the private sector while protecting the long -term availability and affordability of the units produced as well as insuring compliance with other city requirements. /0< Sample Development Agreement April 6, 1983 Page 2 The Development Agreement, as drafted by staff and reviewed by the Council, will form the basis of future agreements entered into by the City and developers of senior housing units in the Senior Housing Overlay District. Sample Development Agreement: The attached sample Development Agreement has been drafted by the City Attorney and Planning staff in order to demonstrate to the City Council the basic contents of such an agreement and to seek feedback from the Council. In preparing the sample agreemnt it was intended by staff that certain provisions would run uniform throughout all Development Agreements entered into by the City. Those sections of the sample Development Agreement especially pertinent to a particular project basis are indicated by -'blanks" which would be filled in by the staff at the time an applicant applies for assistance from the City. Calm ark Cost Anal sis (pro forma) for Heritage Park Pro ect; Attached for Counci review is the cost ana ysis an request for City assistance (development incentives) prepared by Calmark. This item is included in order to show the City Council how the cost analysis and request for assistance will be integrated with the proposed basic Development Agreement. City staff will use the cost analysis and request as a basis for negotiating with the project developer (in this case Calmark), drafting a Development Agreement and making recommendations to the City Council. It is anticipated that all Development Agreements entered into under the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District will be shaped in this manner. Next Stews: Based on City Council direction, staff Development Agreement and information submitted by Development Agreement for the proposed Heritage Park to the Council for its review and approval. NO lCTICN REQUIRED Resyectfully,,,.ubmitted, Rick G mez Cjty M inner RG:R'4: jr i Attachment: Sample Development Agreement Calmark Cost Analysis Calmark Request for Assistance 16G will use the sample Calmark to draft a Project and send it 0 • • 0 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of 1983, between ( "Property Owner ") and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ( "City "). RECITALS This Agreement is predicated upon the following facts: 1. Government Code section 65854 - 65895.5 authorizes the Citv to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. 2. Under section 65865, the City has adopted rules and regulations establishing procedures, requirements and administrative guidelines for consideration of development agreements. 3. Property Owner has requested City to consider entering into a development agreement and proceedings have • been taken in accordance with City's rules and regulations. 4. Citv has found that the development agreement is consistent with the General Plan. 5. On _______, 19_, City adopted approving the deve__lopment agreement with Property Owner and said action was effective on -, 19_. NOW, THEREFORE., the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless the context other :wise requires, the following terms shall have the following meaning: a. "City" is the City of Rancho Cucamonga. b. "Project" is the development approved by Citv, described further in paragraph 8 hereinbelow. C. "Property Owner" is _ and includes all of -its succes Fors inin ntrest and. assigns. d. "Real property" is the real property referred to in paragraph 3 hereinbelow. I In7 e. "Senior Housing Overlay District" is -the • zoning category created by City Ordinance No. _ adooted 19 f, "Target population" is the primary group of occupants, residents and tenants occupying any and all units or apartments in the Project as further defined in the Senior Housing Overlay District. 2. Recitals. The recitals are part of the agreement between the parties and shall be enforced and enforceable as any other provision of this Agreement. 3. Description of Real Pronertv_. The real property which is the subject of this Agreement is described more fully in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Interest of Pronertv Owner. Property Owner reore- sents that it has full legal title to the real property, that it has full legal right to enter into this Agreement, that there is no other person or entity which has any other interest in fee ownership to the real property, and that all other persons and entities who may hold legal or equitable interests in the nroperty agree to be and are bound by this • Agreement. If there are any holders of deeds of trust on 6e real property which may be senior to the lien of this ^evelooment Agreement, the holders of such deeds of trust have assented to the terms of this Development Agreement in writing and agree to be bound by the provisions hereof. 5. Sindina Effect of Agreement.- The burdens of this Agreement shall run with the real prooerty and shall bind, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, the successors in interest and assigns of the parties to it. 5. Relationshio of Parties. It is understood that the con tr ac EuaL releTions nip necween City and Property Owner is such that Pronertv Owner, is an indenendent contractor and is not the agent of City for any purcose whatsoever. 7. City'; Aooroval Proceedings _ for Project. On ____ —_ _ On 19 the City adop Md a zoning designation of 's �nior Housing Overlay District" for the real prooerty. The record of the applications by Property Owner, pro - ceeriing, before the Planning Commission and the City Council of City on file in the office of City and all of the files and records in these matters are incornorated herein in full • by this reference as though set forth in full. Property Owner o_ronoses to construct apartment units, recrea- tional and common area facilities, and narking spaces and other amenities on the subject property, all as are set forth more fully in the site plan for Planned Development ( "Site Plan ") submitted by Property Owner and approved by City, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference. The Site Plan in- cludes various conditions of approval which are not changed, altered or modified by this Development Agreement unless specifically set forth herein. S. Changes in Project. No change, modification, revision or alteration may be made in the site plan without review and approval by City. 9. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commerce on the effective date set forth hereinabove, regardless of the date of execution hereof, and shall continue for _ years, subject to the annual review described in oar agr eoh 15 hereinbelow. 10, Time for Construction. Property Owner agrees to begin construction of the Project within days after the effective date of this Agreement and to diligently . prosecute to completion the construction of the Project. It is anticinated that Property Owner will complete the Project within _ days after the date actual construction begins. ?rooerty Owner shall make reports of the nrogress of construction in such detail and at such time as the City may reasonably request. 11. Restrictions on Rental Units. Property Owner shall res[etct Ghe avaitu5ilitj and occupancy of all rental units or apartment units in the Project primarily to the Target Population as described more fully below. The "primary resident population" of the Project which must be reserved for and occupied by the Taraet Population shall be 3 of the units or apartments, Property Owner shall use its efforts to make the entire Project available to the Tarnn,t Population. Aoartments reserved for the primary resident 000ulation of the Taraet Pooulation may not be rented, occupied, leased or auble3sed to tenants or. occu- pants who are not in the Target Population without the C i.t7's ortor written consent, except as set forth below. A person or persons not a member of the Target Population may occupy an apartment of those apartments reserved for the Target Population if thev occuov the unit with a resident occupant who is within the Target Pooulation and- a. then, only in an emergency, and for so long as the state of. emergency exists; /n(7 0 b. on a temporary basis, not to exceed three (3) months out of any calendar year (grandchildren, blood relatives); and C. medical support personnel or private nurses for resident occupants within the Target Population, 12. Tar et Ponulation. Tenants, residents or g - -- -- -- occupants in the um is reserved in accordance with paragraph 11 in the Project shall meet the following criteria: a. For tenants, residents, or occupants who are married to each other, the head of the household shall be fifty -five (55) years of age or older. b. For individuals who are not married, each individual shall be fifty -five (55) years of age or older. C. In addition to the age restrictions set forth in subparagraphs a and b above, any individual or married couple who wish to occupy or reside in the Project shall have and maintain an annual income from all sources equal to or less than eighty percent (808) of the median • income for persons or couples within the County of San Bernardino as currently defined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. 13. Rents and Rent Adjustments. The Property Owner shall establish and marntarn affordable base rents and utility allowances for all apartment -units subject to the restrictions of paragraph 11 in the Project. For the our - poses of this provision, rent shall include both the amount charged for occupancy of. an apartment and any utility allowances if utilities are not separately metered. If utilities are separately metered, they will not be considered in the base rent. Rents for apartments subject to the restrictions of paragraph 11 may not exceed amounts consistent with the following base rent formula: Rents charged will be affordable to individuals or couples earning Less than eighty percent (608) of the Count, ' of San Bernardino median income as determined by the Federal Department of dousing and Urban Development, which rent shall also be equal to or less than thirty • Nn 0 percent (305) of the Project occu- pant's gross monthly income. In the event that rents are increased, a minium of thirty (30) days' written notice of any rent increase shall be orovided to all affected tenants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Property Owner shall use its best efforts to charge affordable rent for all units within the Project in addition to those sub- ject to paragraph 11 above. 14. Maintenance of Apartments as Rentals. During the term hereof and such extensions as may be agreed to, all apartments in the Project shall remain rental units. No aeartment in the Project shall be eligible Ear conversion from rental units to condominiums, townhouses or any other common interest subdivision in which some fee ownership in the aeartment would be granted to a person or entity other than the Property Owner or in which ownership of the Project would be transferred to a corporation or other entity which would then sell stock or some other cooperative ownership interest to a prospective owner or occupant of an apartment • or dwelling unit. 15. Annual Review. The Property Owner shall file with City an annumreooet containing information specified herein Ear the preceding calendar year. Said annual reports shall be filed with the City no later than March 15 fol- lowing the orevious calendar year. The report shall contain such information as City may then require, including, but not limited to, the following: - (a) rent schedules then in effect; utility charges (if any); (b) Project occupancy profile including age, income characteristics of residents, number of automobiles owned by Project residents (total); (c) Listing of substantial physical defects in the Project including a description of any repair or maintenance work undertaken in the reporting year; (d) A descr.intion of maintenance of the Proiect including the condition of units, apartments, land - scioinq, walkways, stairs, recreational areas, and so forth. City shall he allowed to conduct annual physical in,uections of the Project as it shall deem necessary. The City ;hall further he allowed to conduct an annual survey of residents in the Project in order to assess their satisfac- • tion with the Project. The survev may contain, but shall not necessarily be limited to, questions regarding management /tenant relations, maintenance of the Project, design features, general attitude toward the Project, and so forth. 15. Additional Renortinq Items. Prior to the execution hereof, Property owner shall submit to the Citv the following information: a. An analysis of the cost of the Project including land cost, construction cost, financing cost, and so forth; b. Tenant selection procedures which shall detail the methods that Property Owner shall use to advertise the availability of apartments in the Project and screening mechanisms that Property Owner intends to use to limit the occupancy of the apartments to the Target Population. 17. Tenant Selection Contracts and Rules and Reaula- tions. Or receipt of an application for occupancy in the Proiect, Property owner shall determine the eligibility of • the occupant under the terms of this Development Agreement. Property owner shall verify the information supplied by the applicant and shall verify the income of the applicant for the purpose of deter mininq qualification. Property Owner may refuse to rent to an applicant if it determines that false information has been supplied on the application or, in the two years preceding the application, the applicant has been evicted by a court of law. Property Owner may not use source of income or marital status in determining eliqibility. All agreements for rental of units in the Proiect shall be in writing. The proposed rental agreement or lease form shall be provided to City for its review and approval. Proposed rules of conduct and occupancy, if any are adooted by the Property Owner, shall be in writing. Such proposed rules of conduct and occupancv and anv later revisions, additions, or modifications thereof shall be submitted to the Cit•1 for its review and approval prior to use in the Project. Such rules of conduct and occupancy shall be n_iven to each tenant prior to such tenants, occu- nancv. 18. Terminatinn and T- Wiction of Tenants. A tenancy in an apartment in the project :nay be termLnaeed without the termination being deemed an eviction under the following circumstances: • i ., , a. Death of the sole tenant of the unit; b. By the tenant at the expiration of a term of occupancy or otherwise, upon thirty (30) days' written notice; C, By abandonment of the premises by the tenant; or d. By failure of tenant to maintain income eligibility pursuant to the provisions hereof, providing that Property Owner gives tenant sixty (50) days' written notice of such termination. Anv termination of a tenancy other than those listed in this subnaragranh shall constitute an eviction. property owner shall only evict in compliance with the provisions of California law and then only for material non - compliance with the terms of the rental agreement, lease or rules and regulations of the Project. property owner shall establrsn appeal and /or grievance procedures and rules and regulations • for use for evictions in the project, which shall be submitted to and aooroved by the City prior to the occupancy of anv apartment in the Project. 19. Local Residency. Preference shall be given where possible to applicants to the Project who have been resi- dents of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. This factor, however, shall not be given any prioritv over the other elements of tenant selection in paragraph 17 hereinabove. 20. hazard Insurance. Property owner shall keen the Project therecn insured at all times against loss or eamage by fire or other risks covered by a standard extended coverage endorsement and such other risks, perils or coverage as Property Owner may determine. Pronertv Owner shall also advise tenants that such insurance does not cover their personal property, and work with occu- pant; to obtain for them, if possible and if desired by the occupants, policies of insurance on the contents of aoartments and personal property of the occupants thereof. ourinn the term hereof, the Project shall be insured to its full insurable value. City shall have the right to review insurance coverage maintained by Property Owner or its successors and assigns and the power to require additional insurance to he carried of a kind and in amounts at the City's sole discretion so that the provisions of this paragraph are corn nl icd with. City's action or inaction hereunder shall not subject it to liability to anv third • persons or entities, 21. Maintenance Guaranty_. In order to insure that c maintenane of -Ehe Project is performed in accordance with the maintenance plan as outlined in the Senior Housing Overlay District administrative guidelines and in this De- velopment Agreement, Property Owner shall either establish a landscape maintenance district pursuant to State law and City ordinance, regulation and /or policy, or post a maintenance deposit or other legal security acceptable to the City to be used by the City in the event that Property Owner shall fail to adequately maintain the Project or breach this Development Agreement. 22. Specific Restrictions on Development of Real Prop - ertv. The following specific restrictions shall also cover the use of the real property: a. Only residential uses of the real property are permitted in the Project. b. Maximum density of residential dwelling units in the Project shall never be greater than dwellin units per acre, g C. The maximum height for each of the proposed • buildings is: d. Maximum size for all of the buildings and the Proposed square footage for each of the apartment types located therein is set forth more fuliy on Exhibit "g" attached hereto and incorporated heroin by reference. e. Provisions for reservation or dedication of Ian,] for public purposes are contained in the conditions for approval of Parcel. Map Number and are incorporated herein by this reference. —` 23. Hold Harmless. Property Owner agrees to and shall hold Citv, its of'rcPrs, agents, emplovees and representa- tives harmless Erom liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury including death and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Property Owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, emplovee or other person acting on his behalf which relate to the Project. Property Owner agrees to and shall defend City and its officers, agents, employees and representatives from actions for damages caused or alleged to have been cause(] by reason of Property Owner's activities in connection with the Project. This hold • liU • harmless agreement applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reason of the ooerations referred to in this Develooment Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Project. Property Owner further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and nay all costs and provide a defense for City in any action challenging the validity of this Develop- ment Agreement. 24. Affect of Oevelooment Agreement on Land Use Regu- lations. Riles, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the real property, the density of the real nroperty, the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the real property, are those rules, regulations and official policies in force at the time of execution of this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that City may grant Property Owner a dwelling unit densitv bonus, may reduce its requirements for on -site oarkinq, may waive its requirement for covered on- site oarkinq and may reduce and /or waive other fees as an incentive for Property Owner to construct the Project and for both parties to enter into this Development Agreement. Such incentives agreed on between the parties are set £ort'i • on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 25. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part only by mutual written consent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in Government Code sections 65868 et seq. This Develooment Agreement does not prevent City in subsequent actions applicable to the real property from auplvinq new rules, regulations and policies which do not conflict with those rules, regulations and policies applicable to the prooert•i as set forth in paragraph 8 hereinabove. This Develooment Agreement does not prevent City from denying or condi- tionally approving any subsequent development project apnli- cation on the basis of existing or new rules, regulations or policies. 2r+. 5nforcament. This Agreement is enforceable by any party hereto notwithstanding a change in the applicable General or Specific Plan, zoning, subdivision or building regulations adopted by City which alter or amend the rules, regulations, or oolicies qoverninq oermitted uses Of the land, density, design, improvement and construction standards and ,^,necificatiOns. In the event of a default under the or.ovisions of this Agreement by Property Owner, City shall give written notice to Property owner by narsonal service on the renresentative of Property Owner (or its successor) at the Project, or by registered or certified • mail addressed to Prooertv Owner at the address stated .in this Agreement, or to such other address as may have been designated by Property Owner, and if such violation is not corrected to the satisfaction of City within thirty (3D) days after the date such notice is given the Citv may, without further notice, declare a default under this Agree- ment and, upon any such declaration of default, the City may bring anv action necessary to enforce the obligations of Property Owner growing out of the operation of this Develop- ment Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for specific performance of the provisions of this Development Agreement, or for an injunction against any violation by Propertv Owner of any prevision of this Agreement, or for such other relief as may be appropriate, it being agreed by Property Owner that the injury to Citv arising from a default under any of the terms of this Development Agreement would be irreparable and that it would be extremely diffi- cult to ascertain the amount of compensation to"City to afford adequate relief in light of the purposes and Policies advanced and satisfied by approval of the Project and by this Development Agreement. 27. Event of Default. Property Owner is in default under this Aq r. Bement uoo� the happening of one or more of • the following events or conditions: a. if a warranty, representation or statement made or furnished by Property Owner to Citv is false or proves to have been false in any material respect when it was made; b. if a finding and determination is made by the City following an annual review pursuant to Paragraph In hereinabove upon the basis of substantial evidence that Property Owner has not complied in good faith with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement; C. breach by Prooertv Owner of any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after notice described in paragraph 25 hereinabove, 23. Proceedin4 Upon Default. City does not waive anv claim of defect in performance by Property Owner if on periodic review Citv does not modify or terminate this Agreement. Non - performance by Property Owner shall not be excused because of a failure of anv third person or entitv. Adontion of a law or other governmental activity making performance by Property Owner unprofitable or more difficult or more expensive does not excuse the performance of the obligations to be taken by Property Owner under the terms of • 10 9 this Develpment Agreement. All other remedies at law or.in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in the City's regulations governing development agreements are available to the parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Development Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Development Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 29, Attorneys' Fees. In any proceedings arising for the enforcement of this Development Agreement or because of an alleged breach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover the costs and attorney fees incurred in the proceeding and such reasonable attorneys' fees as may be determined by a Court in any legal action. 30. Cumulative Remedies, The respective rights and remedies oiovided by this Development Agreement or by law or available in equity shall he cumulative and the exercise of any one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude or affect the exercise, at the same or at different times, of any other such rights or remedies for the same or different defaults or breaches or for the same or different • failures to perform or observe any term or provision of this Agreement. 31. Partial Invalidity. If any provision of this Agreement shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 32. Aindinq Effect. This Agreement shall bind, and the beneETts and burdens hereof shall inure to, the respective parties hereto, their legal representatives, executives, adminstrators, successors and assigns. 33. Recordation. This Agreement shall, at the expense of Pronertv Owner, be recorded in the official records of the County of San Bernardino in accordance with provisions PC the Government Code, 34. Miscellaneous. This Agreement shall be construed in by the laws of the ,State of California. The orovisons of this Development Agreement shall be liberally construed to effect its purpose as set forth herein and in the attachments hereto. Whenever the context so requires, the singular number includes the plural, the plural includes the singular, masculine gender • includes the feminine and /or neuter and the neuter gender includes the masculine and /or feminine. The time limits set 11 ;11 forth in this Agreement may be extended by mutual consent of • the parties in accordance with the procedures for adoption of a development agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties and shall be effective on the day and year first above written regardless of the date of actual execution hereof. PROPERTY OWNER: BY: (Name) (Title) BY: (Name) (Title) CITY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: BY: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On , 1983, before me the undersigned, a Notary Putiliu in and for said County and State personally appeared and proved to me on thu basis of satisfactory evidence toto 5e the persons who executed this instrument as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation existing and organized under the laws 12 I /T' • • • of the State of California, and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonqa executed it. • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO NOT4RY PUBLIC On ----- 1 1983, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State personally appeared and proved to me on the oasis of satisfactory evidence to be the Persons who executed this instrument as and on behalf of _ and acknowledged to me that ttie corporation executed it. 13 I/ p NOTARY PUBLIC EXHIBIT "A" _ • (Legal description of the Project) • C, J 170 0 • 49 EXHIBIT "9" (SITE PLAN) (Detail of apartment size and size of all buildings) Iz 1 r XHIBIT "C" (Incentives to Property Owner) • • ! ) 2.- Calmark Development Corporation CZ 1212 March 24, 1963 VIA FEDERAL EXPRES-- City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Cali`_ornia 91730 Attn: Rick Darks Planner Re: Heritage Park Rancho Cucamonga Dear Rick.. Pursuant to our conversations yesterday I have included a profozma on our Senior Citizen project. This orcforma is hased on our most recent estimate of costs with the following qualifications: 1. It assumes a permanent loan interest rate of 11;. This is the rest volitiie of all the assumptions and will have the • greatest impac`_ on the rents as it adjusts with the market. 2. Thr�se costs are estimates at this ti-ce and will not be firmed u:: until we can let the contracts. I have also atten•oted to outline the benefit cost of variccs items conter..platcd in the development of this project. To simplify this task I will deal with an average rent over the entire project. Average Rent 172 1 Bedroom at $350 60 2 Bedroom at 410 Total 232 $84,800 Per Unit - $365.50 Cost Benefit Itsols Densi.t: - To build this Project at conventional densities (i.,. 23 CPA) and conventional parking (i.e. 2.2 SPU)r The avnr,tnu market rents would he approximately $495 or $130 Per mono', increase in the initial rents by not incorporating the licritag.o Park concepts of dan.sit7 and narking, erofo r:na rents tF:at ha :'�� been incoruor.ated in the analysis I hava attached to this letter, take thiu desien teature into account. It is e a il y s that a senior project of a conventional design 2121 Cloverlield Blvd, Suite 202. PO Box 2128, Santa Monica. California 904W213)453-1773 i n ' ) Rick Marks March 24, 1953 Pace. Two would not address the needs of low and moderate income senior citi- zens. To answer the question "What other costs can be reduced and what is their effect on the initial rents ? ", I studied the ef`_ect on reducing costs in general and the impact this had on rents. The concept is that a cost savings would reduce the need for that much additional financing and would therefore reduce the debt service and the rents. Therefore, by distributing the savings equally over the 232 units, a savings of $100,000 would result in a reduc- tion. in rent of $4.00 per unit per month. To break this down into simple terms I have identified several items and their cost effect on rents. Archibald Im,orovements - the cost of the improvements to Archibald attributed tibuted to the elderly site is roughly $80,000. If this were eliminated the savings would be $3.20 per month on all 232 senior apartments. rchitecture! Enhancements - Estimates for the added window treat- . ments ($105,000) and the 'heavy stucco facia above the balconies • ($45,000) care to a total cost OT $150,000. If this were to be eli,inated from the project the savings in the rents would be $6.00 per unit per month. Fe ^_s - The city is presently requiring development fees as follo Fee Approx. Cost system Fee $48,000 Parks & Res. Fee 42,000 Beautification Fee 28,800 Storm Drain Fee 26,325 Plan Check & Building Permit 23,362 'total $168,487 Lf these fees were waived the savings would be $6.75 per unit per month. Those are just an example of what can ho done. Calmark would pro- pose_ that the Council consider the following in response to tha question of. 'ghat tho city can do to achieve the lowest initial rent lcvcl. 1. Fla ivc all Cit^ fees 2. Naive impro "Imcnts to Archibald • 3. 'na r• ;c additicn. :1 architectural treatr ants I -) '/ Rick Marks • March 24, 1963 Page Three 4. Contribute $200,000 in the form of a land write down or to pay for some of the onsite improvements or landscaping. Additionally the City could use some of its set - aside funds or place the project in a redevelopment area and use the tax incrc. -eat to further reduce the rents. I believe that if the Citv and Council are willing to try all of these methods, that together we could bring the rents of tho one bedroom apartments below the $300 level. If you have any questions or additional ideas please don't hesit -:e to call me. Sincerely, CAL ?L'.4i; DEVELOP ?!EST CORPORATION r • Utrry Versons Pro7ecc `anag2r LP ;. 1J, 0 x5v1 Ant PA4A.9NCX0 CLt,"dA Land Cost% Lana $96_ �tl65 5969.!65 Coalmltin, Cacti hue Cost 1,591.690 121,929 S.F. 6eaeW 150,000 On%Ite Cost 906,M. 010:1 Cast e6.m6 Lee% 4W.Cm Artn. 6 Ell. 1]AJ50 SN -toLl Cms6. Cmb; 5. LEA 1. 63,22 1S.]. IYrtetfnq Ce4% Meet -uo 622,W0 Me<. fueaflnf nql !0.001 A&erti Sing n.mc Legal ]S.GLtl Sue -tan! W uw" co"': 5]01]00 233 u"ts Ilnm[e [ae% Ire. Lan fee 121 126,620 n'. Load /,, (61 179,660 COmt. 1.11121 ] 1) 119,860 CTWII Cans 20,970 .. 15.m Sueaoul flan, Cost'; 921.110 On"", cont. C Wrr. 269,074 __169,0,4 Tool cd,"Iontlm Cast,: M_�0P9A;] IBCO ^. evq mt4SP DATA 1 PHmmn Wntt I x ewraon W. 610 4rax lent.! ma. 51 .017,6W BhCelbne6us InCVe _ "2r grntt al"111 Ill, 1.OZI,CW It lawnl, I." n9 alt � " :1!3 alt CLlflt ln9 1�t.r+ 01 723.537 ]}].S]] CMt Wlfte �� 1Z1.199f� It SLmaele —i -7A- NPI'Ji11 !16 IXY]SnTer ]Ynl iro,rR (,It 15.111,020 - lan ja,lll,9aq_ .me.ele I'll 1 11.1 5 19 orarn r� mmr. my 0 ru.. Calmark Development Corporation Heritage Park Project Pro Forma Summary Sheet Development Specific S �- Incentive ___ Request Val ue ___ I Rent Reduction 1 Impact -All Units General Cocaoents 7) Dwelling Unit Increase density _ Density Bonus by 103 units please According to the project devele to build this project at conven- t) Reduced Parking Eliminate 350 See $130 tional densities (i.e., 20 units Ratio parking spaces per acre) and with conventional General per unit parkino (i.e., 2.2 spaces per 3) Uncovered Waive zoning ord. unit) the average rents would be parking area requirement for a Comments per month approximately $495 or 5130 per % of covered parking month greater than the proposed rents (average S365.50 per month 4) Fee Waivers a) System Fee $ 48,000 or Reductions b) Parks & Rec. Fee $ 42,000 c) Beautification Fee $ 28,600 $6.75 d) Storm Drain Fee $ 26,325 e) Plan Check & $ 23,362 per unit Bldg. Permit Fee ,D (all fees waived) $166,487 per month 5) Redevelopment Agency- Cash contribution $200,000 $8.00 use of 20% Housing to project Set -Aside $ per unit _der month 6) Off -Site Waive improvements $ 80,(300 $3.20 Improvements per unit - Archibald Avenue per month 7) Architectural Waive requirer!ents ! Enhancements for $6.00 - window treatment $105,000 per unit -heavy stucco $ 45,000 per month facia $150,CC0 Calmark estimates that f _______ r every 510D,OD0 of cost leavings or City financial contribution thoy can lever the monthly rent unit by $4.00. 1 �!_ per 0 • 31 .b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner o �t•caArp tc Z 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -03 - CALMARK - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) to High Residential (24 -30 du /ac) for the development of 233 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 6.25 acres of land located west of Archibald Avenue, north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -34. Related File: PD 83 -01, Parcel Map 7827 SU,MMARY: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 9, 1983 to consider the above - described amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council based on the findings per the attached Resolution. Attached is a copy of the Planning Commission staff report which fully analyzes the proposed amendment. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 83 -03 through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolution City Council Resolution 0 E nrmv nc n ♦ wrn vn nrrn n nnnX*n n STAFF REPORT" 1977 DATE: February 23, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman. Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -03 C,11-MARK - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of land, located west of Archibald, and north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -34 RELATED FILE - PD 83 -01 - CALMARK PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Calmark Development Corporation is requesting a General Plan Amendment to High Residential for the development of "Heritage Park ", a senior citizen affordable project of 161 apartment units on 4.55 acres of land. Heritage Park will be part of a larger Planned Development on 9.78 acres of land that will include 103 general occupancy apartments as shown on the Detailed Site Plan, Exhibit "C ". The proposed project density for Heritage Park is 35.4 Warne. Therefore, Calmark will be required as a Condition of Approval for Planned Development 83 -01 to enter into a Developer Agreement for a 25% density bonus (above 30 du /ac) pursua.n.t to State law regarding incentives for affordable housing. The project site is presently vacant undeveloped land. There is a previously approved 152 unit condominium project, Tentative Tract 11615, for this site. The property is located on the north side of the Alpha Beta shopping center at Base Line and Archibald. The surrounding zoning and land use are shown on the attached Site Utilization Map, Exhibit "A ". The property is currently zoned R -3 /PD and designated Medium -high Residential (14 -24 du /arce) on the General Plan (Exhibit "B "). i,) q l GENERAL PLAN AMENDi¢NT 83 -03 Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 3 RECON'•1ENOATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and material relative to this amendment. A Resolution of apprpval is provided for review and consideration. ctfullyuubmitted ty L Attachments: Letter from Calmark Development Corporation Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "8" - General Plan Landuse Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Initial Study Part I • Resolution of Approval 2 n c • rY , e,`,: c -', ,l JIF "7151 ^1. 9111 -1'- '111213141016 s. January 24, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Ile: Calmark Senior Housing Project GPA Attn: Dan Coleman Dear Dan: • Calmarle Develonnent Corporation hereby requests a GPA on its proposed project at Lomita Court. Our request is for a GPA change to High Density 24 -30 units per acre with a bonus density that allows the project to proceed at 35.4 du /ac. This request is justified based on the nature of the product targeted for elderly residents at an affordable rental range. We believe this project provides a program that meets the City's affordable housing strategy found on pages 14, 15, 78, 83 and 89 of the General Plan. '- El Very truly yours, HardyGM. Strozier� Principal HIMS : rc Ul?ILI,\' ASSIST. INC. 3151 Airu gv Aroa a(,, Bldg. A -2, Costa .Ursa, California 92626, (714) 556 -9890 9 ........... • WE 1�l • i c . ... .. . .. . . . v FRn x rnxinATtlo r...2 WE 1�l • i EGEND r Q a SINC.I[ FAMILY I�(1 • VACANT .V., LVm2L -, PLA Y aouxa R -3� •• ° "' R -3 —, .ma I..,ALI 0 IA vn[ sr. r- - - r-, I M- R- T-._- LJ .J R -3 u oAAxu.Awrr - C -:xie XY LLNOOL unx. I'r/ ';ou'i I \ R -i -S p -3 O R -3 u IIAVE m/ L —J — _____ —_ S. R. R. —' I.crt - m'a i C o-Y C -2 C� ITtI C.ir R-3/PO1 J Q ..e / 6 Lams _:cuxi— tcn:u only[ - _ R -3 /PD O �, �..-• o o YAK �. A. AF' -R�3 C-1 p rw 0 uu ��.i IC-1 II s' C I n -P R -31A �j' PL3iP S C •Pi .C-1 L R -31�� :. -- " - - -- - ! r \tip A -P ;fir C -27'.. - OnC FR' C--, 1- IN( AZT II CITY OF �m IZ:1 \CI IO CL'(':1�IO. \'(;:\ rrn.h.�LTr' tJT►u- Z�"'j1C;�1�+n PLA\ \l \G DIVISION SCALF: Lam'✓ - MEDIUM 4(s Du'S /AC MEDIUM 4-14 DU's /AC MEDIUM -HIGH 14 -24 DU's /AC O NEIGHEORHOOD COMM. COMMERCIAL ::::•:� OFFICE :k :, I 0 NIORTI I CI'1'I' A RA\CI IO CUCAMONG1 Trrt.r 0 PLANNING DIVISION icXnirrr:. —P__ sc,u,G 1 !!% L =. I«� 0 SUNRISE — — LOMITA COURT GENERAL OCCUPANCY APARTMENTS rLO UUaI•�.r`. .. �.c•. � • .^. :a.'Mr�o.r.nu /// fN f�VIJ yf \+-` ue .r i JJ 0 WAiEP iAMI(5 e O y -t a- a 1 ^!• r� �4 - f�� ter• S -- •�" nl'��n• �' ei Al I .< 11 -1 k F P " h ilH U (J— ...... ........ ..... ... D COMMERCIAL I HERITAGE PARK ELDERLY APARTMENTS r COMMERCIAL V � KORTI I CITY OF IIIA1: �1_�3 -G3 _ Is R ;1 \CI IU CCC\JIO \(; ;� rrn.r. ,!5rre - - -�� PLANNING DIVISION I ?XIIIhIT � SCALE AREEREEME 1Z,I wveERrAPO — — LOMITA COURT WAiEP iAMI(5 e O y -t a- a 1 ^!• r� �4 - f�� ter• S -- •�" nl'��n• �' ei Al I .< 11 -1 k F P " h ilH U (J— ...... ........ ..... ... D COMMERCIAL I HERITAGE PARK ELDERLY APARTMENTS r COMMERCIAL V � KORTI I CITY OF IIIA1: �1_�3 -G3 _ Is R ;1 \CI IU CCC\JIO \(; ;� rrn.r. ,!5rre - - -�� PLANNING DIVISION I ?XIIIhIT � SCALE AREEREEME 1Z,I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $67.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no sicni- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further infor-a- tion concerning the proposed project. • PROJECT TITLE: Heritage Park- Rancho Cucamonga, Sunrise - rancho cuc.r...onGx APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Cal ^.ark Deceiopme2t Carp. P.O. Box. 2128. Santa Monica California 90406 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO HE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Larry Persons, P.O. HoN 2128, Santa Monica, California 90406, ( -1i73 /fia r;: Scrazier. lrhan Inc., 11.1i %irway :WUnn0, Bldg. :1 -:, U; ;t.: fle sa, C:\ 9Lh�o 71 d/356-9490 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Vacant i.and, Rancho Cur.amonea, San Bernardino Countv mss. Par -,,l +' 202- 151 -34 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 l[!,�- C • PROJECT DESCRIPTION P ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 9.78 acres - 426.010.8 SF No existing buildings DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY S'r.°_ETS): There arc no .structures on the nrooerty and no kno:rn cultural, historical or scenic nsnec LS evident on the provercv. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 1 -2 04 Explanation of any YES answers above n m-- o: the rcilo•.Lt2 trees: rlaranus Nceriioiia, iacara ^Ca Acutl-:lla, Ii rac�:vciiiron Popuineus, Cupaniopsis An acardioides, Alnus nhombitol'.a, Eu�aiypcus CiCriouora, '.riscania Conferta, Liquida:.bar Styr =_cit lolia, anti Lagcrstroerlia Lndica. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Developmen eview committee. Date_ 12/15/82 Signature 1-14_ Lar y Persons Title Project anneer _ I -3 r�U -� WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO \ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in denand' £or municipal services (oolice, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? , _ r 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S. Remove any existing trees? How many? 29 X 6..,-Create the need for use or disposal of _ potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flatmnable$ or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above n m-- o: the rcilo•.Lt2 trees: rlaranus Nceriioiia, iacara ^Ca Acutl-:lla, Ii rac�:vciiiron Popuineus, Cupaniopsis An acardioides, Alnus nhombitol'.a, Eu�aiypcus CiCriouora, '.riscania Conferta, Liquida:.bar Styr =_cit lolia, anti Lagcrstroerlia Lndica. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Developmen eview committee. Date_ 12/15/82 Signature 1-14_ Lar y Persons Title Project anneer _ I -3 r�U -� c � RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Ccc_ -onca Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the schzol district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Calmark Develop®ent Coro., Parcel Xap #57 Parcel #2 of Parcel Nap :i.�792 in the City of Rancho Specific Location of Project: Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Californi i PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE -I PHAt-- i TOTAL 1. Number of single fardly units: 0 0 0 0 0 2. Number of multiple family units: 161 60 48 269 3. Date proposed to begin construction: •4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model i and ! of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range -" A -1 390 0 16 14 30 B -2 460 0 28 20 48 C -2 530 0 16 14 30 *A -1 320 120 0 0 120 *B -2 410 41 0 0 41 * Scntur Citizen Projoct. I -4 I 1J� . RESOLUTION NO. 83 -30 A RESOLUTION APPROVAL �OF GENERAL PLAN X!Ed)NENT 23 -D3s h.'lE:1D R :!IE NlD I'1G THE ADOPTED LAND USE PLAT! OF THE RANCHO CUCA110:1GA GENERAL PLAIN TO THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, that Rancho Cucamonga has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the General Plan encourages affordable housing projects; and WHEREAS, the proposed General Plan Amendment will result in tde construction of affordable senior citizen apartment units; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Planning Commission policies; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will not he materially injurious or detrimental to surrounding property; and WHEREAS, Section 65361 of the California Government Code provides for amend -eats of mandatory elements of a General Plan at any tine during a calendar year for an affordable residential development, as specified in said section. Nii THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commis,ivr does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the following Amendment to the Land Use Plan of the General Plan. SECT'.ON 1: General Plan Arsendment 83 -03: An amendment of the General Plan Land Use Plan in the area west of Archibald, and north of Base Line, further described as Parcel 1 of Parcel .dap 7327, as shown on the attachrd 'Exhibit ",A ". This area shall be changed from Medium-High Residential to High Residential. SECTI'IN 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planrr.nn Ccmmission has found that this General Plan Amenc^:ent will not cre3e2 a sinniricant adverse impact on the environment and recoi' mends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on "arch 9, 1983. pnnPg;ED AND ,w ^O PTcD THIS 9711 DAY OF '•'ARCH, 1983. PLAN'lI C(d4IY 1 SS; 0'1 OF 'Hi CITY OF P.AI;CHO CUC ;J!O:Nf,A BY ;eriny N iig, C, tinn /'-/ o Resolution No. 83 -f i Page 2 / I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly an- regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, STOUT, BARKER, MCNIEL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE i1-l9 • n U ID TENTAll':E PARCEL MAP NO, 7827 S4 JS .... ... .... S'.4 1. 3 i. El u Z7-r 0 ---------- �--, I I vt PA PCH NAP t10, 7827 ov. ..... ----- ---- t 6j- L f, vi I. r. ti q5- 17- . RESOLUTION NO. * 8 3 - a 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED LAND USE PLAN OF THE RANCHO CUCA40NGA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment and recommends approval thereof; and WHEREAS, this Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and policies contained therein encouraging affordable housing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the following Amendment to the Land Use Plan of the General Plan. SECTION 1: General Plan Amendment 83 -03: An amendment of the General Plan Land Use Plan in the area west of Archibald and north of Base Line, further described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7327, as shown on the • attached Exhibit "A ". This area shall be changed from Medium -High Residential to High Residential. SECTION 2: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted for this General Plan Amendment based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Laurin M'.J'.Jasserman, City Clerk Joni). i4i ke is, :layer !Cn 0 • I STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner r✓ 7 9 f 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83 -01 - (PARCEL MAP 7827) - CALMARK - A change of zone from R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) to R -3/50 (Multiple Family Residential /Senior Overlay) and the development of 305 apartment units of which 233 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres generally located west of Archibald, north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 - APN 202 - 151 -34. Related File: GPA 83 -03 and Parcel Map 7827 SUMMARY: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 23, 1983 to consider the above- described project. The Planning Commission requested continuance of the public hearing and several modifications and additional information. A revised project together with the requested information was presented on March 9, 1983. The Planning Commission approved the related Parcel Map and recommended approval of the Negative Declaration and zone change. Approval was granted subject to four modifications to the proposed plans as discussed below. The senior housing density of 37.5 dwelling units /acre is subject to granting the requested General Plan Amendment (83 -03) and density bonus in conjunction with a Development Agreement as provided by State law. The market rate density of 20.2 dwelling units /acre is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) . ANALYSIS: The following four modifications were required by the Planning Commission: Seperate Market Rate Access To Shopping Center - This will be accomplished by a seperate wrought iron or similar fence and sidewalk along the westerly project boundary (see Exhibit "Ae, Revised Site Plan). 2. Ramp Areas At Curbs - This was added as a condition of approval and will be reflected in the final construction plans for the senior housing. %S1 Planned Development 83- 01 /Calmark City Council Agenda April 6, 1983 Page 2 3. Stucco Fascia On Senior Units' Elevations - The fascia area along the top of the Heritage Park elevations will be enlarged and covered with a stucco finish. This change will be reflected in the final construction plans. 4. Density Limited to 37.5 Du /Ac - The revised Site Plan, shown in Exhibit "A ", indicates a 37.5 du /ac density for the senior housing. CORRESPONDENCE: At the Planning Commission public hearing there was no public opposition to the project. Representatives of the V.I.P. Senior Citizens Group gave testimony in support of the project. Staff received a letter opposing the proposed density increase, as previously distributed to Council. This item was advertised as a public hearing and notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planned Development 83 -01 for the above -described project through adoption of the attached Ordinance and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Resp4tfully su4mitted, / ! V l r�, �,Ai/ ' pick Gomez C1 ty Ptanner r:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Revised Site Plan Planning Commission Staff Report 6 Resolution of Approval Minutes of March 9, 1983 Planning Commission Meeting City Council Ordinance J 15-2- E • CITY OF lll.AlN.NlN(; DIVISION /5 31 SUNRISE GENERAL OCCUPANCY APARTMENTS HERITAGE PARK ELDERLY APARTMENTS (p 25 cv....� 55-7 V V \ORT1 I • i� .na' nc, n n niwn OT-OS VONYad .•re ,. STAFF REPORT DATE: February 23, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Commission 1 °7 FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 33 -01 - ARCEL MAP 82 - CALNNRK - A change of zone from R -3 /PD Multiple Family Wes dent Development) to R -3 /SO (Multiple Family Residential /Senior Overlay) and the development of 269 apartment units of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres generally located west of Archibald, north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 - APN 202- 151 -34. Related File: GPA 83 -03 - Calmark ; Parcel Map 7327 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a planned development in the R -3 /PD zone (R -3 /SO pending) located north of the Alpha Beta Shopping Center at Base Line and Archibald (Exhibit "A "). In addition, Parcel Map 7827 has been submitted which will appear on the March 9, 1983 Planning Commission agenda. The property is presently vacant and slopes to the south at approximately a 5 percent grade. A previous 152 unit condominium project, Tentative Tract 11615 (Lewis Properties), was approved for this site on February 10, 1982. The surrounding zoning and land uses are indicated on the attached Site Utilization Map (Exhibit "B "). The senior housing is proposed at 35.4 dwelling units per acre and the remaining apartments are planned at 13.2 dwelling units per acre. The existing General Plan land use designation is Medium High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre). A General Plan amendment to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre) is pending. The Senior Overlay and General Plan amendment are for the 4.55 acre Heritage Park portion of the site only. ANALYSIS: The project has been reviewed by the Design Review, Growth Management, and Grading Committees. As indicated on the attached Parcel Flap (Exhibit "C "), access to this property will be provided by construction of the Lomita Court cal -de -sac. The project itself has been designed with a private street system and driveways, as sho.vn on the Detai L;d Site Plan, Exhibit "D ". Archibald Avenue will be widened to facilitate a left -turn pocket to resolve traffic circulation concerns. Drainage will be carried to the southeast corner of the project site and collected into an underground pipe structure that will drain onto Archibald Avenue. The water will then be carried south by curh and gutter to an existing storm drain inlet structure at the intersection of Base Line and Archibald, as shown on Exhibit "K ". ks // Planned Developme, 83- 01 /Calmark Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 2 • Within Heritage Park a total of 129 parking spaces (0.8 /unit) have been provided, which is below the normal requirement of 2.2 spaces per unit. This reduction in parking is an incentive under the Overlay District provisions. Based upon survey information and field investigation, 0.8 spaces per unit is more than adequate to meet the parking needs of a senior citizen project. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE: The Committee has '.worked with the applicant to resolve concerns relative to the Site Plan configuration, recreational space, and elevations. The Site Plan has been redesigned to redistribute units in both projects to provide a more open feeling and larger recreation areas. The Design Review Committee felt that the elevations for the non - senior apartments (Sunrise) needed a stronger roof element, therefore, these elevations have been redesigned to provide a more continuous shed roof system as shown on the attached elevations, Exhibit "H ". The Committee also felt that the exterior treatment of the end units within the senior apartment complex (Heritage Park) needed more relief to break up the flat wall plane. Therefore, stucco window plant -ons have been added to provide a shadow line (Exhibit "I ") . It does not appear that this meets the intent of the Design Review Committee, therefore, staff is recommending a condition of approval requiring more detail and relief from the flat wall be provided at the window openings as shown on elevation B -8. ENVIROaMENTAL REVIEIJ: Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because of mitigation measures designed into the project. Therefore, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. FACTS FOR FINDING: The Parcel Map has been prepared in accordance with City standards and policies and the project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision. The project design is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Hearing was placed in The Daily Report newspaper and approximately 27 public hearing notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. In addition, public hearing notices were posted on the property. Prior to the public hearing, the applicant met with the senior citizens "VIP" group to discuss the project and received their input. The "VIP" group supports this project. To date, no further correspondence has been received either for or against this project, • ,�s • Planned Oevelopmek 83 -01 /Calmark Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 3 RECC9IENOATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after such .consideration the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Resplectfylly,aubmitted, anner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Letter from Calmark Development Corporation Supplemental information packet Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit 118" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Parcel Map Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan • Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Natural Features Map Exhibit "H" - Sunrise Elevations Exhibit "I" - Heritage Park Elevations Exhibit "J" - Heritage Park Recreation Building Exhibit "K" - Off -site Drainage Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions 11 /.S �, Calmark Development Carper l �� Rmse v�Ce Februa ry 11, 1983 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ATTN: Rick Marks Planner MI rL fr - ., .:1(✓�p 1. Re: Heritage Park - Rancho Cucamonga Response to Senior's Concerns Dear Rick: In response to the concerns expressed by the senior citizens who were kind enough to give their input to the design of housing for seniors, I would like to take this opportunity to detail how Calmark addresses each of their concerns in its Heritage Park apartment program. o Lichting - The lighting at Heritage Park is handled through a combination of walk lights mounted on poles for maximum dispersion and to minimize any potential for injury due to tripping. Mercury vapor lights are mounted on the interior ends of buildings to provide large amounts of light to the interior spaces. Porch lights are provided along the balconies and outside the front doors to illuminate the entrances of each apartment. Finally, street lights are placed in the parking areas to light the perimeter of the project as well as the parking areas. The combination of all of these methods is utilized to achieve the goal of no dark or unlit spaces for someone to trip or hide in. o Intorface With Surrounding Projects - The design of the project focuses the attention as well as the activity of the seniors to the center of the development. In addition, great detail is given to the buffering through berms and landscaping to minimize any inpact from surrounding neighborhood. Entrances are Limited to restrict nuisance traffic through the development. In general, Heritage Park projects are designed and developed to promote the feeling, of a community within the project while limiting the intrusion or impact of the surrounding neighborhood, 2121 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 202, RO Box 2128, Sanla Monica, California 90406 (219) 4531773 % <q • Ll • • Rick Marks Feburary• 11, 1983 Page Iwo Handrails - The handrails that are presently designed for the project are of a textured wood. We could provide a curved rail to serve as a grab bar to satisfy the concern over having a smaller rail to hold on to. Recreation Room - The Recreation Room presently being used in the Heritage Park Program is a single stoy structure which comprises approximately 2000 square feet exlusive of the manager's unit and office. This building will contain, in addition to the manager's apartment and office, a large open space for meetings, parties, or just gathering to talk. It will be equiped with accordian style doors to provide for the division of the space on a temporary basis. The building also includes restrooms, laundry, kitchen and storage facilities. o Affordabilitv - This is without a doubt the biggest concern of all of the parties involved. The basic plan for the Heritage Park Program is designed to provide the necessary comforts of living without adding the additional expenses of luxuries • because we have found that this segment of the population just can't afford them. It becomes a choice between living spaces or food. We can all thinkof items to add that would make the project just a little better in some respects, but we also have to understand that these people are on a fixed limited income, so the overriding concern should be, how can we lower the rents just a little bit more? The City and Calmark working together are making an attempt to do just this by reducing unnecessary costs, waiving fees and exploring avenues of Further assistance such as bond fiancing and land write downs to provide the development with the lowest possible basis on which to base the rent structure. We definately believe that through these efforts and input from interested groups of senior citizens, we can deliver new housing for the senior citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. Sincerely, CALNA .K D'E %ELOPNf. \T CORPORATION arry P,4.,ons Project X:innger L?: th SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PACKET • c _ n Calmark Development Corporation of Santa Monica is currently requesting the Planning Commission and City Council ' approval of a 269 unit apartment community located within the 9500 block of Lomita Court in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. This project is composed of two programs operating inde- pendently of each other; Sunrise, a 108 unit general occupancy apartment complex, and Heritage Park, a 161 unit senior citizen apartment community. We feel that this site is unique in that it most completely satisfies the needs of both senior citizens who desire decent affordable housing, and families and indi- viduals who seek comfort and luxury at a price they can afford. Calmark is very concerned with the overall well being of its tenants and is, therefore, extremely particular in select- ing a city and a location within that city for the placement of its Sunrise and Heritage Park programs. We have found, through analysis of the 1980 census data, that Rancho Cucamonga is an attractive community with a pop- ulation of 55250 people. Ten percent of the population (5499 people) are aged 55 and over, and 54% (29,979 people) are be- tween the ages of 18 and 54. Rancho Cucamonga is large enough to provide adequate service to its citizens, yet small enough • to promote a warm, friendly environment; an environment which is extremely attractive to senior citizens seeking comfort, security, and community acceptance, and to young individuals just starting out, and young families who are looking for a place to raise their children. In addition to the favorable environmental aspects, 138, or 7332 people in the city are renters, and the community vacancy rate is 48, thus, as home prices continue to remain out of reach of many young families we would not only expect to see the number of renters increase, but also an increased demand for luxury apartments. This is the market for which the Sunrise apartments are designed. As the demand for luxury apartments increases at a rate faster than the supply (new construction), which it will in the short run, many of the existing apartments will be taken by this younger, higher income earning population who, in ab- solute dollars, are able to spend more money for housing than a retired person, for instance, who is limited to a pension or other form of fixed income. It is for these pensioners that the Heritage Park program is designed. • )cq � C C The Heritage Park Program is the private market solution . to providing decent, low -cost housing specifically for persons aged 55 and over. In periods where young individuals cannot afford to buy homes, but can afford to spend more money on rental housing, without such a program for senior citizens, many of them will be forced to settle in unsatisfactory of in- adequate housing. The proposed project, thereforer provides housing for both groups. The Sunrise apartments are designed for families and individuals who seek comfort and luxury? and the Heritage Park apartments provide decent affordable housing for senior citizens. Together both communities meet the demand for housing in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. THE SUNRISE APARTMENTS The population in California and especially southern California has been increasing continually during the past decade. Coupled with increasing construction costs and mortgage rates, home ownership in the eighties has become almost impossible for the new or relocating family. Spiraling mortgage rates and the drastic reduction of new home starts has created a dramatic shortage of available apartments. It is • this segment, the new and relocating family, who cannot afford homeownership, that the Sunrise Apartment Program is geared to meet. In response to this demand in housingr Calmark Development has developed it's "Sunrise Apartment Program ". The key points of the program are as follows: • Location - Chosen with market exposures long term appreciation, and convenience in mind. • Condominium Conversion - The Sunrise Apartment Projects are processed and built as airspace condo- miniums to more easily facilitate the conversion and sale of the units as condominiums at a future date. • Market segmentation - Plan, design, develop, market, and manage apartments exclusively for specific market segments. • Superior Design - By eliminating hall areas, and maximizing efficiency in other areas, Calmark has produced plans which economically meet the basic requirements of luxury living. • Neighborhood emphasis - Calmark Sunrise Apartments are a quality garden apartment within an urban setting. The use of two story construction and lush landscape treatments creates a park -like residential neighbor- hood. C C Open space - 15 to 25 units to the acre without sacrificing open space. Landscaped open space at a • Sunrise project is over 50 percent. Proper scale - Large enough for economies of scale; small enough for personal management and sense of community. 100 - 250 units. On -site amenities - Social and recreation center, pools, jacuzzi, laundry facilities, 508 + open space. In Rancho Cucamonga, the Sunrise Apartment Community is situated on 5.95 acres of land in the 9500 block of Lomita Court. The project consists of. 108 units; 30 one bedroom units and 78 two bedroom units. There are 18.2 units to the acre, yet the 9 buildings, 108 carports, and 130 open parking spaces (a total of 2.2 parking spaces per unit) are designed within a pleasantly landscaped garden -type setting providing for maximum open space. HERITAGE PARK RENTAL HOUSING PROGRAM FOR SENIOR CITIZENS Calmark's solution to the housing needs of the aged is a • program called the Heritage Park Rental Housing Program for senior citizens. The program is a senior citizen garden apartment community designed for the comfort and affordability of these more sensitive residents. The project offers decoratively landscaped grounds reminiscent of the East and Midwest. There's a comfortable clubhouse which is the center of each Heritage Park and serves as the community's information center. It contains a lounge, a brightly decorated activity area, laundry facilities, the resident managers office, and mail boxes right in the lobby. It is a decidedly different affair than the recreation room of a typical 070's -style singles complex or a dreary government housing facility, circumstances Calmark found foreboding to most seniors. The apartments are noticeably different, too. They are designed for senior citizens. Cupboards and wall switches are several inches lower than average; wall plugs are several inches higher. Stairways have extra deep steps with landings halfway between floors. Most units accomodate wheelchairs (first floor units, wherever possible, have gradual sloped camps, instead of stairs, all the way to street or parking areas). • /N C C • All- electric kitchen appliances are selected in large part on the basis of how easy they are to clean. Fully automatic heating and air conditioning units are provided in combination with quality insulation to greatly reduce the cost of physical comfort to these more sensitive residents. Double- locking doors and smoke detector alarms provide an extra measure of security most seniors have come to rely on. Decorator - designed interiors are carefully planned using lighter, brighter - yet, entirely contemporary - color schemes to provide an additional, subtly positive, environmental influence. Realizing that apartment life is far more than brick, mortar, and wallpaper to a retired person spending most of his or her time on the grounds, Calmark encourages residents to Personalize their apartments with approved paint colors, wallpaper, extra shelves, hanging plants, and the like, to further increase their sense of home ". There is a unique lifestyle at every Heritage Park that combines a respect for privacy and independence with an understanding of peoples' needs for companionship and shared activity. Calmark's management philosophy provides for • facilities and coordinated activities without forcing them on anyone. Privacy is a matter of choice, and when it's company you want.... it's right there outside your door. The clubhouse and outdoor patios are the hub of social activity at any Heritage Park. There's always hot coffee and someone to chat with when residents pick up mail or do their laundry. The comfordably furnished lounge is an easy place to spend an afternoon reading or playing cards and games. There is a craft area for all sorts of activities, and the lobby doubles as a dance floor for parties. The clubhouse kitchen facilities are a big plus when residents hold a party for large groups. The outdoor patio areas and gas barbeques are a scene of numberous summer afternoon and evening parties. Residents at the Heritage Parks elect their own activity committees and hold potluck dinners, Bingo, swap meets, arts and crafts classes, and often organize group excursions. Some have formed "Sunshine Clubs" to cheer up ailing residents with flowers and cards. Still others have bought pianos, pool tables, stereo equipment and additional games for activity nights through the proceeds of fund raising events. Calmark sponsors a monthly newsletter at each Heritage Park which is written by residents and on -site managers. These include greetings to new neighbors along with announcements of activities and meetings. Holiday festivities such as parties and barbeques are held throughout the year, some sponsored by Calmark, and others by residents. C � Community involvement is important too. Managers • coordinate with private and local government agencies to help residents take advantage of low cost services for seniors. In many of the cities, existing Heritage Park residents have free _ transportation available for shopping and medical appointments, very low -cost hot lunch programs, "meal on wheels" for shut -ins, mobile library facilities and many more services designed to aid seniors. With so much involvement and specialization of facilities, it would seem inevitable that Calmark has an overhead problem at its Heritage Parks. Surprisingly, they don't. Heritage Park rents are generally lower'than existing, nearby housing; and substantially lower than typical new construction in the area. Lower rents are attributed to land use and project design which incorporates 40 units to the acre and provides less parking per unit than ordinary general occupancy projects. The Developments are designed with a mixture of seventy -five percent one bedroom and twenty -five percent two bedroom apartments. In a recent study of the program, it was found that this usage results in an average of 1.2 people per unit. This figure is substantially lower than a typical general occupancy • apartment project built at 15 units per acre resulting in 3.24 persons per unit (Census Data 1980, mean persons per unit for Rancho Cucamonga). This fact, accompanied with smaller unit size, 515 so. ft. average as compared to 800 -850 sq. ft. for typical general occupancy, results in the reduction of any impact from the project's density. In the same study, Calmark learned that only 518 of all its tenants (from seven existing projects) were car owners. Thus, the parking needs for seniors are not as demanding as for a typical general occupancy project. Calmark takes this into consideration in the project design which provides parking at .6 to .8 spaces per unit. It is believed, based on past experience , that this range is more than sufficient for satisfying the parking needs of the elderly. In a study prepared by L.D. Ring Inc. for Calmark, it was found that this type of project will only increase traffic flow by 3 trips per unit per day. This figure is substantially lower than typical apartment projects and can be justified by the fact that Calmark tries to locate its projects adjacent to shopping, recreation and health care facilities so as to min1mi%e the need for a car. J J(,, Currently, our oject of 4.55 acres is dc(' gned for 161 units, 116 one bedr .,,ns and 45 two bedrooms (72•.,8 one bedroom, and 27.58 two bedroom). This works out to 35.4 units per acre, • slightly lower than our average of 40 du /acre. Parking will be Provided at .8 spaces per unit or 129 spaces. A project of this size will generate an insignificant increase in traffic flow of only 483 trips per day on both Archibald and Baseline. The project design, consisting of 9 buildings, including recreation building and managers unit, is similar to our existing project in Duarte, which provides a central corridor within the project allowing appoximately 508 open area. This area not only lends itself to the garden type atmosphere, but also provides a warm "homey" environment in which the elderly will be comfortable. The ideal location for a Heritage Park is across the street from a shopping center, bordered by two churches, three or four doors down from a park, and main bus lines crossing at the corner. In the City of Rancho Cucamonga we feel we have found a such site. It's located in the 9500 block of Lomita Court, northwest of the intersection of Baseline and Archibald. At this site, both projects, not just the Heritage Park, are located to provide maximum exposure to community services and personal needs required by both type of tenent. . For both communities, the project is located adjacent to two major shopping centers, including grocery and banking facilities, near City Hall, and Alta Loma elementary school. It is within one mile of the Post Office, the fire station, Lion's Park and Lion's Community Center, Alta Loma High School, Cucamonga Junior High School, Central Elementary School, and Dona Merced Elementary School; within two miles of the sherrif£'s station, LaMancha Golf Course, and Red Hill Country Club, Chaffee Community College, Cucamonga Elementary School, and Rancho Cucamonga Middle School; and within four miles of the Ontario International Airport, Vineyard Park, Cucamonga - Guasti Regional Park, and The San Antonio Community Hospital. Interstate 15 is located 4.5 miles east and the San Bernardino freeway is located 3.75 miles south of the project. (See Exhibit "A ") Overall, the site we have chosen for our Sunrise and Heritage Park programs most completely satisfies the needs of all ages of the population demanding housing. It's hard to believe that such an ideal location could be obtained which would allow for decent housing of senior citizens at an affordable price, as well as, provide comfort and luxury to those families who desire the setting of, but are unable to afford, homeownership. Very effectively planned and controlled construction, along with a unique project design, and local government cooperation can result in two remarkably successful garden apartment communities known as "SUNRISE" and "HERITAGE PARK ", located in the 9500 block of Lomita Court, which will most clearly meet the demand for rental housing in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. 1(-4 7 IYTN 9Y "EXHIBIT A" i LO MITA CT 9 BASE LINE AVE r, 1 D VICINITY MAP W n J < u A - SUNRISE & HERITAGE PARR LOCATION < B - NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE & ARCHIBALD 1. Alta Loma Sewing Center 14. Mi Casita - Mexican 2. Farmer's Insurance Restaurant 3. Dick Nelson's Insurance 15. Alta Loma Liquor 4. Pool Supplies 16. Nicasistros Italian 5. Video Plus Cuisine 6. Action Travel 17. Daminco Hair Dimensions 7. Tony's Cleaners 18. Speed Queen Laundry • 8. Hole in the Wall Deli 19. 011ie's Health Foods 9. Sunshine Fashion Showroom 20. Dentist's Office 10. Beauty Supply 21. Optometrists Office 11. Thrifty 22. Upland Savings 12. Alpha Beta 23. Security Pacific Bank 13. Sizzler C - SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE & ARCHIBALD 1. Pup 'n Taco 7. Walker & Lee Real Estate 2. Barro's Pizza B. Galaxy Arcade 3. Village Donuts 9. Video Station 4. Rainbow Gems 10. Schwinn 5. Jupriz Hair Design 11. Baskin Robbins Restaurant 6. D & M Cleaners D. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASELINE AND ARCHIBALD 1. Foothill Independent Bank 8. Law Shoppe 2. Albertson's 9. Athlete's Foot 3. Clothestime 10. Nancy's Hallmark 4. Coffee Co. 11. Lorenzo's Deli 5. Harvi's Cleaners 12. Antiquity Furniture 6. Angels 13. GTE Phone Mart 7. Command Performance E. BUS STOP • 10 OTHER INFORMATION Area Churches Distance From Project Church of Jesus Christ .8 miles • of Latter Day Saints Alta Loma Community Church .4 miles First Baptist Church .3 miles United Methodist Church .6 miles Area Schools Alta Loma High School .9 miles Cucamonga Jr. High School .8 miles Central Elementary .8 miles Dona Merced Elementary School 1.0 miles Cucamonga Elementary 1.6 miles Alta Loma Elementary School (North) Adjacent Rancho Cucamonga Middle School 1.9 miles Chaffee Community College 2.6 miles Parks 6 Recreation Centers Lions Park 6 Community Center .6 miles Cucamonga - Guasti Regional Park 2.9 miles Vineyard Park • 1.0 miles LaMancha Golf Course 2.1 miles Redhill Country Club 2.1 miles City Offices s Miscellaneous Post Office .9 S .7 miles City Hall .4 miles Sherriff's Station 1.9 miles Fire Station .9 miles • San Antonio Community Hospital 15 Freeway 3.8 4.4 miles miles 10 Freeway 3.6 miles Ontario International Airport 4.0 miles 10 I 1 � ,t. J - t 4 `nLL 1 - -4 V KIMTI I CITY OF THAI: am wl'i PLANNING DIVISION IsmImrr: sc:.v.I �l= /(,7 • ( C LEM" O . 'MLE iAn ILV Iwu[1 • 1 V1GH} SuL.LS ne. caccxc 3 � •en.r lao r —� cacaxu LA VlaE sr. Lc °J s xC of J R-3 E.cxr� ..nxc I fT� R -3 O R- 3c- --� S. P. R. R. LS 6aAxCE Ca/ / c.f.f C. wT w rtun\ C -2 C. -- C-1 :Mks Lonlu _munr' Lcn:u Mlt -Rc3�i } Awr C-1 R-3/PD sre.ee I I is ;.AVx rAH • R 3AUa R -3 /PO ,eca A -P I5 /{ \jam O �' O O .,fAxr R�I —� Accracs rust L ti A -P U T L L_ BAS_ /Ll`rJE —j� ROAD / R l R-1 \ORTI I CITY O F I p $3•D � 1Z. \NcI IO CUC MONGA Trnr,ItIMM _LIMIMMICNAAW 111ANNI \G 0iVISION FNI nrrr . o► SCALE; /W, C� �i NORTI i CITY OF I I 1:.\J ss -a I RANCI K) CUCAMONGA TITLE: A-14,CZLo —M�Q-J—T;70 1'1,,\NNI\(; DIVISION lomflilir— —SCAIT1 /�q SUNRISE GENERAL OCCUPANCY APARTMEC. '" } }II LIIYEERrARO LOMITA COURT I'll vin WATER TANN$ 17 00 4 (�J! 1 1 i I 1 1 1 00 7 1 117 F, �;7 f71 I n i ill n I u I ..... CIA& 41 .7.1 I- 1 -1- ' - HERITAGE PARK 71 ;T ELDERLY APARTMENTS NORT11 CITY OF ITIAI; 09 R';1. .x('1 10 CUICANIONC I'LANNING DIVISION I -? () LUMREI YAr9 LV','ITA COURT is rn I , f I i it MWI'l I CITY 01 ITEM: — ?P—So it, VNCI 10 cu(': N lux(,;� PLANNING DIVISION vq; pii� , I LUMREI YAr9 LV','ITA COURT is rn I , f I i it MWI'l I CITY 01 ITEM: — ?P—So it, VNCI 10 cu(': N lux(,;� PLANNING DIVISION vq; LUMREI YAr9 LV','ITA COURT is rn I , f I i it MWI'l I CITY 01 ITEM: — ?P—So it, VNCI 10 cu(': N lux(,;� PLANNING DIVISION LA CITY OV N cl to CL, ANIONG, IMISIO., 71 T1 I ' ra TIMER J;N Jill g C C T:l al3 ^1f • I —• I4 —_ it XUKTI I R:1 \C'I IO CL'C':1JIO \(;:1 TITI,I;: PLANNING DIVISION 1 -73 5 UATERIALS AND COLOR3 .�.LCRN. REID NT 0 lilt wi lo, a A A A 0 EXTERIORS re Qi ll-�\ GN SIDE 14 hl 4, mg k FRONT SIDE "M rlL [tUM"CA960 fPA914— RECREATIOU BUILDING E ok LU ox 4 r fj ral 121-:3 jIn T F T7 M AM i (T Y Y ( A' ITENI: R, CUCA VN IONGA TITTE HANNING DIVISION ENI 11BIT; _SCALE; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further inforra- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Heritage Park - Rancho Cucamonga, Sunrise- Rancho Cucanonlv APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Calmark Development Corp. P.O. Box 2128, Santa Monica, California 90606 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Larry Persons, P.O. Box 2128, Santa Monica. California 90406. ( ) 4 - /Murcia :,. StrnZi¢r. l'rh:m 71:/355 -9890 LOCATION OF PROTECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL N0.1 Vacant Land, Rancho Cu camorga, San Bernardino County Ass. Parcel n 202- 151 -34 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: • I -1 1 -7 � • PROJECT DESCRIPTION • 9 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY; 9,78 acres - 426,010.8 SF No existine buildings DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): There are no structures on the property and no knor cultural, _ historical or scenic aspects evident an the property, Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? I -2 1 -78 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO g 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? r 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? 29 X 6.:--Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: 29 existi.a Eucalyptus trees which cannot be incorporated into the design of the project will b romoced. These trees will be replaced by a landscape plan which will i e .,, n..x of the followin¢ trees: Placanus Ace,ifnlia. Jacaranda Acur ifn, ice I:ucOl ptus Citrioaora, Tristania Gonierta, Liquida0bar Styracifolia Lngerstroemia Indica. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, Complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation - to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Oevelopmen eview Committee. Date, 12/15/82 Signature r " Lar y Persons Title Project �anaeer I -3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION •he following information should be provided to the City of Rancho- Cuca -onga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Calnark Developnent Corn., Parcel Yap ]1579 Parcel ��2 of area ?fap v 792 in t e City of Rancno Specific Location of Project: Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California i PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE-3-- PM*S" - TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 0 0 0 0 0 2. Number of multiple family units: 161 60 48 269 3. Date proposed to begin construction: •. Earliest date of occupancy: Model and i of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range A -1 390 0 36 14 30 B -2 460 0 28 20 48 C -2 530 0 16 14 30 *A -1 320 120 0 0 120 *B -2 410 41 0 0 41 * Senior Citizen Project. I -4 I r?) Calmork Development Corporal 7 � 1 a&i nG9 se�+a March 2, 1983 .,(� - �� Ur;lTy rCVG'. OPL ^Ffli DEPT, IdAh 31983 iM PM 7131911�)ll)i21112131416(6 Q City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Via Federal Express ATTN: Dan Colman Assistant Planner Re: Response to Planning Commission Concerns Dear Dan: Calmark Development Corporation would like to address each of the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission and the extent that the modified site plan incorporating these ideas. N i-i cizen units - i'ne two projects are now separated by a • publicly dedicated street. The recreation buildings have been further separated along this street. Each project's parking and traffic circulation pattern are independent of each other. Finally, with the reduction in the number of market rate units the interfacing of one project along the other (the common perimeter between projects) has been reduced as well as the potential number of people causing any kind of impact. o Pitch of the Stairs - The stairs are designed well below the allowable pitch to provide easy access by the elderly residents. The rise is restricted to 6 1/3 inches and the tread is at least 12 inches. In addition each stairway has a landing half way down. 0 width of Walkways - From our experience the width of the waikways as designed (4 ft.) are plenty wide for two of our residents to stroll side by side through the grounds, In fact they are wide enough for someone to walk beside a person in a wheel chair. o Texture of Walkways - The sidewalks are a rough skid re- sistant finish and the up stairs walks have a Murcote covering, also a skid resistant material. 17J 2121 Clovedield Blvd., Suite 202, P.O, Box 2128, Santa Monica, California 90408 (213) 453 -1773 1 1.' 1 C C Dan Colman March 2, 1983 • page two o Size of Recreation Room - The modified plan include some additional senior citizen apartments so we would increase the size of the.recreation building to around 3,000 ex- clusive of the manager's apartment. This is based upon our experience of building size for number of residents compiled from our other existing Heritage Park Projects. o Parking Separation - The modified plan segregates the parking of each project to prevent any parking interface problems. o Parkinq Patterns - The modified plan changes the patterns and circulation of both project's parking, such that each project is independent of each other. There is no longer any common private drives which could have caused an in- terface problem. If speed within either project becomes a problem it could be solved with the installation of speed bumps. o Block Off a Portion of Senior Citizens Parking Area - This has been accomplished by the redesign of the parking lay- out. The problem of common drives is no longer a problem. • o Locate the Senior Citizen Recreation Building More Cen- tral - This was accomplished with the modification to t To—cm. The recreation building was placed at the end of the cul -de -sac in approximately the center of the plan. In this position it still provides the needed access to the center of activity for the seniors. o Relation of Buildings to Parking - Additional parking has been provided in the fora of a parking bay near the recre- ation building to spread the parking throughout the site. This seemed to be the best compromise given the concerns of segregated and independent parking and maximized open space. o Donefits Given to Developer, Cit^ Not Getting_ Enough - The City originally contacted Calmark, after hearing about our success at providing affordable senior citizen housing for other communities, to see if senior citizen housing was viable in Rancho Cucamonga. Calmark has de- veloped a plan, refined with seven years of research, to provide affordable senior housing, and to date, are the only ones able to do so without the aid of federal grants or subsidies. This is what the City is receiving, a con- cept planned and refined over many years and almost 1,500 units, a plan to provide affordable senior citizen housing. IV?, Dan Colman March 2, 1993 Page three • lie believe that with the most recent modification to the plan that we have activated the most harmonious balance of your most recent concerns as well as those expressed over the last six months of planning. We urge you to approve this plan and provide the much needed senior housing in Rancho Cucamonga. Sincerely, CAI-11W DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION A4&-- arry Persons Project Manager LP:mk • • • RESOLUTION NO. 83 -29 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECC >C;ElDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 83 -01 FOR 9.78 ACRES, AND REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -3 /PD TO R -3 /SO FOR 6.1 ACRE PORTION OF THE SITE, PARCEL 1 AND 3, SOLELY OCCUPIED BY SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING UNITS OF PARCEL MAP 7827, LOCATED WEST OF ARCHIBALD AND NORTH OF VASE LINE WHEREAS, on the 25th day of January, 1983, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 1983, the Planning Commission held duly advertised public hearings pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. • 2. That the proposed Zone Change would not have �Ignificant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. That the proposed Zone Change is in conformance with the General Plan, SECTION 2: The .Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on March 9, 1983. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby rece-- ^ends approval on the 9th day of March, 1983, Planned Development No, 83 -01. 2. The Planninq Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approvn and adopt Planned Development No. 13 -01 and the zone change request. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission 'hail 6C forwarded to the City Council. rY 5' Resolution No. 83 -y Page 2 `J ScCTIC'! 3: Planned Development No. 83 -01 is hereby approved sut.jec_ to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING COMMISSION 1. Approval of Planned Development 83 -01 is granted subject to approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -02, General Plan Amendment 83 -03, and Parcel Map 7827. 2. All conditions of approval applicable to Parcel Map 7827 shall apply to this Planned Development. 3. Approval of Planned Development 83 -01 is granted subject to approval of a Development Agreement granting a density bonus to allow the Heritage Park project density not to exceed 37.5 DU /AC and the parking ratio shall not be less than .75 spaces /unit. 4. All walkway fascia boards within the Heritage Park project shall be designed to provide a larger • architectural element. 5. Benches shall be provided throughout Heritage Park along the sidewalks. 6. Pedestrian access to shopping areas must be provided along the south and west property lines; details of which shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of Building Permits. (i.e., fencing, security access, ramping). 7. Dense landscaping shall be provided along the perimeter, including columnar evergreens and deciduous trees, to screen and buffer the project from surrounding land uses. 8. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted indicating adequate lighting along Heritage Park walkways. 9. Heritage Park landscaping shall minimize impact from surrounding neighborhood and provide adequate security and buffering. 10. Handrails that can be used as "grab- bars" shall be • provided on all stairways within Heritage Park. ,v,"' • Resolution No. 83 -( Page 3 ENGINEERING DIVISION 11. All pertinent conditions of Parcel Map 5792 shall apply to this project. 12. The east side of Archibald Avenue shall be widened as required by the City Engineer to provide for a left -turn pocket to Lomita Court. 13. Construction of either an AC Swale or curb and gutter and connecting paving on west side of Archibald Avenue shall be required to protect the shoulder from drainage erosion from Lomita Court to the existing curb and gutter. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1983. PLANNING F0!41ISSION OF ?Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ng I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancno Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of February, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, MCNIEL, DARKER, REMPEL, KING NOES: COGC4ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 19 ..Isla'.-if I. IC. • sin VEIEtorSFar Ili, irr cc'. :l l i l ` i; n r 1 /irlfte rl L't AP;LIC :, : :.Cnlutalrk 5,0Iv-._1Qrp.— - - -- ✓iun :r Il..n: l.._a.,, .,,r cn,e: :Linn: a, ""o-va 1. 'rot 1; s.p;t C.::'n,t in: 1'.; DI Y I510_t Fst CO'TL IA'ICE MIIN THE fntLD'd I'.; (' Eli ' is A, Ir• I I-rtt t- 1 •1 Z,. _ .st i.Jl tin",1 1.1-4-1 I.y r rlr,:..l C, _• :arm. A nut I,,, ry *':4 ^a net I :r.l n tin, a, .I om !Z s. _ ..I .man eiybleen (13)'a.rths tram the .:,to If _ 2. CaM:t... :al U^ I' -irl apnrovai ,s graded far a period of '.s /y . n -s. lbe Planning remission at fiat fire may by a.:Iing or deleting coNitions or revoke the Conditional Use Paint. g. l :.n ,t .ve tract Pip approval sla 11 wpire, unless extended by the ptanu u:j C: r -a an, if the final subdivision map is not approved and l..l Tito'. ttwenty -roor (24) merges from the approval of his pr,rt. D, Site D.•v.•I.=nt _ 1. Ile II le Si.a 11 It deer taped in accordance with the .,Proved I le Dl ans no I le in tI- P air, no Div l s ion and the fond s I ons conga l red Aare in. 2. Ain ;gf site pines and building elevations Incorporating all nn.,1t was .f I,,, vaI Shall be .be i tied for review and apprav al by ,/ the Ilvnning D.visaon prior to Issuance of building permits. ,L y Ail vitI plan:, gr al t ny plans, landscape and Ire tr of ton plans, and -r sb,; ^t a -t Dl ans :bill be cooed n na led to, eP is lent, Dr in, to - of butlfing per.nits, prior to final may approval in the cn of a r ,tcv lot subdivision, or approved use has mu.,Iwed, whichever ,,as first. Xd. APDrp'tal of tell r snCSL shall not rnlve fomplianfe with .II secgl., of t e ,11 coq Ordinance. all other applicable City ordinances, and and ❑eable cu mity plans or specific I%... to effect at the time of gusldog Permit ...bone. _I_ X '.is Prior to any use of the Pr.J,stP S rte Pr n Its Ie I.nV Ming -S. eC^'sind thereon. , a rrov,l herein still d be completed to the Satisfaction of the City ,limier. S. .r A detailed Dn -Site LIglaing Plan dull b• o;I- tpiE for roc_ ans a,pruval by the Plsmmdq Div Ilion Prior to tJ,u,,c, of D tilling Pernik. min plan 0,11 lidtmte style. iun - :n,r nn. loofa-, height and method of shielding, is not to adIersely affect alpcent praperu es. l' y\ ]. Au an,pnsu pan root tag shin be a v ftl• vur, .nn ,r ch n •tonal s it lc. n ,-Plc of the rout mdt•nal sn. I h^ -.tbl to 11'r, Plv tag on for reY:rr, a -n arprevnl ,tine to ,: su t -re cr a bin ld.ng pe.eiis v B. R11 tool anp urten to C ^.:. tic I.Jir, i .�-ft, id+^-s. .i 11 be f` ar ern t ^^t„rdl ly indgra trd, Sid n lard lr._�v vet t "e s iIsnlo l III i.1 l ern a', iac eat p�opert irs all streets ds r, qo vet by O ^ II!,I r,r ae,I Building Divisions. DettllS ,hall be- C1. :.i..f1 in M1n ld ten rl••_. 9. All svu-..ing nu.IS Installed at the ff, of initial it ^.e lep - ^nI shell be S..ppin-ated with Solar hwrting. 10. 11t!.,lxed pedestrian Pat Mays across nrNluVO., Mess "ill be provided throughout the development to Corn.=ct .Lei ilia with rpm spaces and recreational uses. _ 11. If no antrallaed trash receptacles are provid•ir. all trash p.A -up Shall be for Individual units with all receptacles Sin¢Id,J f ^ public view. `/ +IS 12. Trash receptacle(,) are required and shall be enciovd be a s met high masonry wall with view obstructing pales pursuant to City standards. Location shall be Subject to approval by Lee Phoning Division. U. Street name, shall be IWIIed and approved by the City PI..... accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy, prior to anpreval Ind recordation of the final tract Nap. ]1. All building's numbers and individual units Shall he Identi(W in a /ate r t clear and concise manner, Including proper illnnimtmn. _15. local Intl MISS, Planned Equestrian Trolls shall be Provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Ernest r tan Ira it PI I,. A detailed equestrian trail plan Indicating widths, maAr, sierra, physical conditions, fencing and weed control. In ac er.t,nce with City equestrian trail Standard drawings, Shall be subrittel for r irl approval by the Planning Division prior to approval and recordation of the final Tract Map• and prior to approval of street lmproven.ent and grading plans. _I_ A ropy of 11 fnvrnadz, Conditions and Pis trick env (CCCP'a) and Alteh's of Inrnr Pnralren or the hello —S As ration, inliecl to P• anp%oval of lnr Dlleclo, and login er inq niv vmvs I t,,, ,,, Al f or +: y, Sbn 11 bf rrenrdrd will this nip and a a.D, Ioirlded to the City. 0. Glo.th Illo,... l 1. :•IIJ a -t—no Lnnrt. Sekar rty dyad hulls and locks shall Ue in'.Irllel <r, . 1.11 ,lull I I11 S UrnJrc[. : c rn ty •! ores au n as .il low locks Shall be in-Jolled on carts unit. I. All unlit within this develop'+enl Shall he pry,lu.p1d to be adapvd 1 r A "Ill, .,I" he" Un3 out. a. 111^1.11 r 'rte 1111 hits ling mrt[riali and appllanrrt a1'e reluired 1. hr L�nr rrl rlrj ill, 111x•, lluj"l I,, lot lrlllr 1111nis loll of rt ^I In rc lurid onto Its ion i -ds, Crl ter as g. arle of In nlal rl n.na11., pvr..e windows. Vol— e. tended nre111a11g:, I11 tlrss poll, an ..5, ,Ir. _ 5. 1h a dwr lnpment it's 11 prov too an option to borne buyers to pnrcim so a In l,lr at ar lir.rt in] on. l t. 6. Ne l l ind nn l la shall be cons true led w th fire rela rdant no ter id and non c.melt[it, lr rnor me le%i a 1. 7. Ail park. y:, open areas, and landscaping III a I bf permanait ly ureiota nod Ivy a hnn,m..... ..sac l at inn o other m acceptable to r, 1 ty. Snrh ..nnf or ma In lenmlce I,a 11 be ra Lm l tled to the PLnmin9 Oivison price to issuance of building permits, o. I'll, 'inject dha,l ....sue a minimum 1 O_ percent or affordable T bonsllrg an qor rents conformance aWr General Plan holing mimics and the bull: ing in defined In the GrowW Mana,lr tit Ordinance. Affordahllity shall be determined by current market rates, rents Ind moue in,mo- levels at the time r construction of the PINOct. An agreement to such shall be approved by the City Planner prior W Issuance or building permits. 1'r nr to III ... sal and .,C.,d,ti.l of the final map. or ',for to ,MeneOf bnlldi.g nermrts •tiro on llromvismn man Is vnlvrd, rn Iiii-tlnn fluent all affected school Uislrt Clz, lfhall he ,•drooled in 11,e 0 „parts ^nt of Com,unily Ofvrinp,fnt which stale: nut rl ^qva V. zrh•1n1 loci M1lids are or will be caPeble of a¢o- nndlUeg Stern +t, q ^era tad by ten Illi CCL Such letter of <er tlr is al ion -rl N.. 11•.n %,. rd try in, School District within molly (90) ears inn or In 1111• f1oil ern approval In the case Of the subd,s,,lco mnD or rv.Uan.e of Dermas in the use of all other residential projects. plat tin. X10. Poor to approval and recordation of the final m r D•Irr W n Issuance .n z of building pfrmltt wl -ap nlrM, ^[ten certification from till affected water WSV 2qthat and water facilitifs are or writ be available to S e ti- prcpi-..l project, shall be Submitt d W to, f ^partnrnt v of Cu--rn eta dell lopmmL Such letter nn it tsar, been 1 ue'I by tea ✓rill dls rot . I Win n nety (99) days prior to final rip ir'n Uval In the . � of subdir islon ante of permrlr in ton of all irdonllal proJCG [s For prof^ -t, u sir, S.A-,,, tali fa- i11„hes alla.alle by the SaM1. Ma Hfglnnal .Itcr Cmir of ro••A Ind ,. Crt Y, ripen ertification of rap4lbr btY. or tat wg all =,1. .. n• I nfornalion, shall be clilioll all s,,, wr tt ^:1In 1- 111— 11. this t.1-di islon w nOf t,I.ntt.d a a l'+•!1 .• .n l.I -�'_ r and 'Is rcnnlrcd to reapply for a pole[ r ','fit 1.1 F - ecllon Of the Gronth ¢ana...... Ur J ,n a%�r rwr Lr treat ..•I t + -f rfcormtlem of the mein. o. G. I., t vehicular Artesa 1. All P,Ikinn let laM.... Of! iz lanJ: :Ill Is ^ ells l5. dr ^ins inn of 5- and shall contain ens rte w•,1 n, ^m to o .1ng V stall (including cu,b). ,1_2, parking let beet shall br a min n -.n,1 15 ,!1,n v:r, n1 LD! at intervals of 10 feel less than the r.alvle d1a -rL•r of to. ter^ ales] � lie Mrilet- of each ovkn, bay. _(, J. All parking spaces shall be sir ip^O per ply st a. ttvs d ...... ;t. _._ a. All lnils shall be prormfd wI'. I'll—I 11 la' <e% ,. z If driveway it Irsz Omn 20 fret in 5. [bf rn. vnarlt t, Codes and R...I, lrlI .n. •1,xll r.:! ..f .- nLLwnnl llaclr, no lets .. t^ unto': Ic.” 111 of transportation for tbt �,,.t t .. IIWiar circular,.. e151ft other than In ,, It :I:I, .r 1I I..., al fat. A de l al led IIII,, a.r .1 I I. N•^ 1. - rl ,• ..q. teal) h., .ne"'t11.1 I- rr: e. .I,.a e - - ,I rt r J .c �'In: _'1 -u f � n pr n to -the of II lI1,vg1•I, .t: I r• 1m in Ural rp al'p. oval In the Case lof a rude• lot s.lb! ...... n. 2. far img [ifs shall be re L+,n %1 w'f e:sr ins :"•ir, A- pl!n of ntmg trn-a sh^-1ng trier rr ^[n^ trr<tn I .III I "SlItt" 11 m] .I Ip' pr t• ,1 of till rough Iri. SrI PIp ,il I pro;,.,Od grading, .,at trees I— to I^ r." o. r, b I -I. � • :..•] •.lore few trees will be planted fee rerla;r-. ^t cf n . I b' :. V x � u ( J. 51 of IS 9lrn IIlr II I...... atoll f, f. iIIt'res"d rIbe, 11"I" Plln If Sin 000 nslallmf lam. City n ar ord,ele With �s I' 1f.^ sic +s inn irn b•d en pr u.IngL /. '• • - H's ib rrt lie ^t Inv Ihm L111 of PnuleI (va•,.n9a antl :hall Ae PInn4•d at -� - I. nn Lon Lu 11 1 -..' '•, II e, pP n'r : =t -•.1 a•lr of r rrr Jn' nn intermr, streets and 20' nn enter ram a ^P.ne, r mifI lore With ter Sinn 0:lio . -f •.•n - t +' °+" '1 '. i apClgeli'. and approved by lhr .Ia. n.n Div., r •. to -p• or fof,n.e, nIt.1Jalo, of any "I". 11_1 . rn ,a nn leers ^.. n, vas eve [o srl .ye shall lr pr,vhi A Wrt h in the develep *^ray 20. -2 e' b a fr toss de. '^t -" `•it •..s t •ne J' tuns, Ina". )+,• -t[ .nllr.,. irn Ire -s O,I lqn. _ 2. nifo 'n + n ., , Dr nfor fr - P lenvrq Dv ¢nrn for th0ir . .. .•1 t^ •• r vI Xs, a it s- n ef <J� < of thn 1r^n Olantrl Within the naives, shall Bu110 in9 rrr +rt :. Lr .I... e •rat ,nl :7 .n to r ., w•1 _ _ t all d ^^ bvI a rt n1 fn If, in lrrt al hail /Il anA rt Y only *+mn +r...rvnl:ol .e p.nYCli. _I\fi, " Sa) c L. rr ahn 11 Ps In V.1J rl Irtrd In e•cmnl • +.r • .lrl r-ltinen n veh r with [Lq.. Pltn(m l•, -.rte If Y- 1-.1111 rin re 11-,ti, %Inn^ or.^ 5 -9a l In pr tar gfr t A. fr.r 1� UC. r :nr -` ^t e nr. atoll Im r -]IN •1 p. •' - _ _ _ Cep i50 nl. II. eI J.pe n. • 1-9II eon r lar .ub I,— r.•M1 1'WI aq. It. of 0."p peel, mA a,rjriale nrOUnd Corrr.t ll If •rl al rv^ Le -[ :In. ), ei All vl •l, pin t . I'll rini" hen shill be cnnt in ,%ly r, nil ain•f ; ... oval of +111, n.l it inn PY llr r'. ^eaten •' nil it n + 11. . n. J n.irs ...Air rin,I m�'�I .!'null .I ,u ran . 1.y Wr 1,rr Pr irr t I - Ill�h.q rnnencv err ,base darts, a insMCt ion shall be conducted by the j`�1. v "d "I acre,.' 1bI I 6^ r v,' ^d b, ..c '•" . Plena inq nIII, ion to netrrmlm that it Is In satisfactory [noel lion. �' - iaotinill fire Rotil n•ttnet St•' all Ieodtc apnd areas slmll be m intaf red in + health and lhriv inq �2. E- •.9 ^ry .rr:s sl+al: b^ r, ov,dr.', r ,rat r•. s..•., r ;_f mad Rlon, free Irwn weeds, trash a and over I. n -• . of :0 feet Wree !t all t. -rt :: c .... _. •' ^ the front rd landscaping, And an approve is to in Ili' sys4m shall Nlhnfertl.ill fire DiiV .c: reIiiir^ - ^u',n 9. Y, mitte to Iclelarry by the Developer in accordance Wf to submitted plans prior Prior In faunae of .r m;• I-- r... ^ ' LO OCCnpdney. ^ 1.111te.g v11,1 shat l he suh'i Inv the 1.' D t "1L 10. the Il.nl netign of Ihr Ili-It" Wert YI. wall', IandsceD,ng and f, templet" oalcr snooty fe• fir^ >• - - < `, _ ion +red nor rvet -ct , ^n r • "3 sileilks shall be Included In the ..amred landscape plans and shell ample: O( mOV be ,Meet la approval by the Planning Olvistrn. a. rn_ •.' applicant shale che"t! tl,^ U.S. IS rc'tal $ e t' .' - the 11. leltures such as ndondin al Llvial rock, IIcities Special IanAScled 4• '�( 1 appropriate lYD "- , "d IncnLOn of ^vl eu• -;. app 17[ 777 sloe tries, meandering sidewalks (both vertical d h .lean In��l �6hyat. is re9ulred alOn9 5 rr ...... r.• -,• . P tart f,l is will in [ ,nr1.v C ' ! 1-r � ^t ':r" -- e •r� \1$. antl Inlens ❑led landica0lag, -1C�1-261f2_/..1pC. Pater and ennirrval inn [echo) shall to atltin). nnY part is ipatiun by one 4nr +r .-. Aey -. project, will require reNaW an, a,, tool ..I +_ e L ^. ell the N -• rlr _ d'o .L special vrlgn ion [febn igns (e.9�. peso ire l9at soot. drought ,rl It 9eney. tolerant Plant species, el luvial rockieapC, etc. 6. Permits fro, tiller decade[ . -ill •, e.. !s Idle ^.e 13. all perimeter is licapen park,ays are required to be encored into the _ A. C Dunn' Ira lands.... ma intennnce des [r i <t _ S. C: n•aY Oa'.t all ant ?,. ;n••a r"`• �la, ttnASlaping a.,I irrinst inn syarn•. rr.prirell to he inslanel On r'1!.11c — '. •long :•r-,tl. C. San iernardmp ^,±+rte Fell (c+:• .I h- •.•,;'. I lnht -rf -.n en elm p ^r i� ^l.r Or 1,11s Ir act area shall bq ortinunusl Y —_ D. Other: — "---- " " - - -- end vaintamrd Ay the dev^Irphr unlll accepted by the City everld Into the landscape maintenance district. -3- • • • ':at•r .z,.1 • yl ms zl.A ll Ln I. "... y +r] :uL ens 1,.""t .4 to --t �.\ 2. A so; is report Shall xe prepared UY a gualll led coginerr licrrce] by r rnnrr �11 ✓. al Vr• Ia`,. "If Cnilnty }fl- orvlr,Cl ([r :f. cvNn 11 the State of Californ la la rerrorm such work. ur Ih.b uI In Il.r 11, Ir. r-cfI 14.+1511 prpdr 1- 'al of 1•:r Irant, nr :,.III P. nnu lL . .t •1l rr of Cd'pl, ante Ifnn CCKJ will be rrennrd -- !. A q 1agical rrgrl Snell I, p•ao,,d LY a •Ir!1N,H nr piing to rl r...ld 1.m. chalky uL fund suhmi [tad at the tine ii appL nl¢n Par ; e.,fl Alin Are[k. fl01101n5 .011'1 Slnv �� L Srlr D' -:rb -p' ^nL d. A mncn areemg plan shall ee cOf Irr] er] ] - v ^I nr twig r, +f mg [I ^it Orr rrinr r nn d [hr r. ^nl R. If .. ,II b- plans snail p• •r; pl.s•] r • -r' ^•! ' tr rr "W 1. u.. 'vt-r; ,l "1- c -n1r u u.0 log-. r.n ld rnl ntrsl aa- ldi nr huilUmy rer. -a tz. (.I 1,..,(,.n 11 11 C, '- 1 o unslur. via wding C•n:., munlnl gall II,,- tlrae¢ C..... ,.I rNI•.r ar.b nnv es •.II •vn S. Asaantm -I of Snxd it It inn. t]•soi lc+ •'r .." .rn •. ,. Llt inns 1n -rt el tII• U -_ cl Izrvencc of rc sat br f 1,unle f ,h - J�'rr x 2. I'I r^ In Of hui l•I1nq 11. it for res hY•nt I Jr -II In, Cr - ;. lan ell zlir 1- ,1't nitfs) or "V^ aUfitinn is no . q[inp rnilfsl, line arphr.nt tpol de.ztel I,, all vn ee l I. In 0, s+[n t r •• at tee r]I aLbseed ..+IC. Such I.r: rrr r,..1..•' ,Im wp' r• S]rnl myisle ^ - r grin. m r.rnr .. .,, ..r l I. I -J a ,-. e:1a aI- „v1 1,I,, tn: faee 0Permi scat POP lrc, Park rc ^. Ias. aid l ICr, LY:L IS P.•,Inp ..... l fro. Permit and plan Check lny Inez. aid h. A!'p•npn+lr r •.un. rr• ^ drC ±-]I "! I, t•a \Cr +nl Irr:. and c : tt a .ot n••d rrc o.J•I to to thr Sl tsl erz lrm a r t11r ..1 ty,ny . A III, I, ]. "1 ..1, u t s I of ru,d mg pr ll for a n uI:m al nr find to nl or audit inn to m ex is t/ng drvo lIII. wit, Ise dA IIc,.t II I,,, r+•anl lairs a[ the rnr. .feef anl:enau paY't c. d -h -S i, -.wits, n•:.. - -.:.v !.. +•. _I.r Irrs nuY not xnl wins xe to; SYS tans Ocvclop.ron[ fee, ylefui VcV fee, 0 Mot "It m0 11'" sup.i "J . p arts r.•, - ;,1'�' V,, PCI (Ira inayr Irr, Per nisi and plan (necking fees. Check Inc I .I nl blln u. N +r: p. c .eu.n .I I e. strerl ad 1, shall a wldrd p the eui Ming Official. be y wig -I a rtllm apnr -rl raa u..t �u,In nl•..]p..a' v.—O, M1� A, .r_I l I rt It^'s,nn. :' 11 • ^- ,z rcpvnilodr J. Et Bt,ySbuc bn es a. fhnl el anl.t Illn, to. 1. cn:npltance r11M1 the Uniform Building Code ror pr ore rer line fin af,-[y —, 1.1.1 Salop hl: ise•, le• e:. r.: .., _.. _ :, .., ;._.r ,i � diallar elearancrs considrring use, area and fire- resizti r<ness of ea ist mq ,.III....I bn lU Illy pn kilt. pns ��ry L r en I •.. •+t , Lnl id inys. Uau s.J 2. E.i:t lny In, i LOny(aI So. 11 be ..we to (amply with c ant U.ilJing Art nrr n r» a :.,r rI, r ... . a All slmr hams i r (:1 Ir -t I v Uc•1 , - Innhl y rrpu la[ionz for the intended use or the Wilding Snell he or 5:1 pr of S11 ,,...1,]11 ;. I .:I e y •_ - - drnnliseed. [nnplet mn or nrpd u,p ]P.... ,1 u� ..• .. u". nntrnl SI.., I x• c p1�Ly pn Ia . _ 1. serape disposal fat Miles shall removed, filled ending U-i rat a•1d Ott ,r .. L nyat l.1 .:•n ;- ;. � o• c,ppLdrlI Fi Capp "d to cnlllply with the Un lform plumb ln9 Code. antl Uniform OuIlO m9 Co and after na [e line urrd and na mte in pr L: a b, n r•r,f " •- s Gm.. after y -rm matJOn. e. Undr roround nn -sit, uli l tiles are In he located and shown an hui Wing fns :•.1: plhG pI YlLlpy plans submitted for Luilding permit application. 1, t. ddatlan ul ':ee_r_cu_lar A_•_[— K. .r ding x i. Oe11C ]t Drs TI+I^ t'f r']!f I1' !,•']I ^• •:1 •'I i.. 5' 1. Lr.A,•y of III- Sa'pect rraperly 5fall br to A,,., ..w rich Re al -watt And all e[ess a.y erii -In r s 11irlic" Pulldlry tn•!r, CI+Y trading 'Landardt and a eeptrd d,n pI vlv III.` F.1111 sh 11 •jrad my alai all pe in zc1,tanI,,I Canlormance rRh tie epllrovrd Ca ceploal grading plan. -4- WA 2. 0, li;,I� 1 he of th, following r-9ht_.f..a1l on 11.1 g sir re ts: C"'3 & SIDE- VIR111 C Sip, 4i. "I", Sit I ET T .1111 1UtIfR 4"' Vt ...... I t I no al f—, on It. I ad-111 "It On Idd . t I free on COMIT"A C, f-"4hu, will h, "'.1 rod her City stild.11do ]CT it- mri 'It I I' bill to art f .... .... I I I_ II � n� n 1 1 ian,n, . ... .... Of a I in ., It. I., III ad, .11 Ir, in, rd a, id" by C'lR I n „1 ,I , I I , I lan't, I 'd I III p, 4- tl I'll wanrl n 0 Si, all I'd In I in I - 'It . ... ... W I. nlr, al C Y a an-Ir I Off 1-n I, I'd 'a,if. i] I I,,. f"i Of rlrd, to I'. in I-- I I at ... d III I”, id 'd-l'i S. $I"-t 'a' I It a,,,,, 111 .1 ldp'd^ I,.a is in, tire ...... . 'hall he ilr . ........ 1 eleir,,, and shall d"'h"It"d or olt-I'd 'a the final map. '1: - I of In 1.11mal.."ani 8. 0 '�ni show the Ini or all ll"tm, , I. ';t yi ", r a tall lying within fit Ore ripI,t-of-,Iy hi, to I,, oh -way. In he on the 'a' per City E,91poer-S real ...... tI. 6. Suably that)? It,' Instiiii -J 9. (an, it I . .... I" be dedicated to the City If th' city ", oiv !t th"PIZI I I c ^ ...... - where sidewalks OrIdee, tbar.o,b rivate property, pit e' e " __d. t of idi-11,r Streat-Lip"yviii .. 1, 7. .—, !'. al, t,,,t l,,,n rmwnB 'hall raw 'rttal'll Z' I� 'It' Chd"t"'ct it;" It'p't Improve "`tS holn'"I. bill hot lim.1-d la. cart, City Ell.11111, P"I to 111all'ill. an,, aIt,,. A.C. R I'. 'ph.,", d,i,, Plakwly it,,, Itrl,in,. it and Uiret ,ift, I,, all Intl. for fit ... I,. Requirrpt f lid... Ik in't. Id the or 11 - Ci•, .1,3 1 "' governed NY the Provision Of flidalai Cad'allpr Re,olatian he. 81M. , — 9. tt,"tin, fly _, .. ..... .... 2. A jdlm,. of t6 -feat -ld' !raff-c at It i,_, with P,1,1-nt within 40'fOOt wide d,dlCAtId "'Ot-nd"'ItY shall ba' 1.hlt,Oltld fail 1t ,,,,t ,, h,, 5 J. 18 III he f_ section it'lobf. Clflt,.rt improvements the following willha, 1.11Odlh,, but "�it "I'd In letter 1111 "It Of reard,d on Or he tO,,t �-Ilt "1 In City Enginmer. limited In: ..L 10. Walkiwit'l""I be provided ant.... l,c pipp,trtan rib r _a Cid-rliat,e:ed drains In 11 be installod to City 0 9 0 pmjra h.,. If. Ora .f I In,I Lr, —I X S. prve lore. sM1.i ll Et res oui lc le for m� i ' °sdlldt ion of 11—el I+: te, ,� 1. Ilea rlarl n..ed .e11 hr •N -w seb lr Inr uma nee tied u! all rn. a r + r S r a ecrerdance din S Ib Cdlargrnia Ed eson C, .•, Ill Crtf +Ira ur,r.l" ldnlrl.... rr..... rl Iry lief ptY st —o'c'. 2. Inter :•r Nan n. +n,.. veil n• ....... r_.I nt urr to na.iny L.. ,I erns: t/ q_ 6• AI•orave is mre not Fc ^a z ^v... b -,• n •r r n terrsteJ a +r•n of CS in vo1 ,^ to -�r 11 cl e11m1: � .ell ng sunlit[ in any r gn.re ^•n[s IM1n[ m I^ rr -..v'I La :•.•_ 'l _— ]. Ir,t Ire ,l'•'.'1 re.e+l Ill li .rl r. rn nr r.lt i.rp l: at pi is irrl•Irrl In r A "r "dl P.guirne.n[S _ +I dP2r nv alt ` .r -u.,n!j nn l it b 1,..aI rI•I Invn,n... era y.,r, dml e[ trOs",t In e et „r I,1[ "o-1 +:1 t f Cllr roneaaa.r no. zd. X.1. Final b,rcel and trail nos ... tl .n -•, to o•r - P.oadrnes. __ i. A J--;. rn nen.l mil /or Ilnnd vin tee U an rfll will Lie rtgJ rrJ to x f.nl.rl In• tl ...l rt. n; h, d— i-Lrng Volt retool( to Slrfrt[, ur to d _. 2. A I.,tr r••1 m n Snail Fr sine rr de ten, P ^`wnl crfdtion of s. :... p. e[.. p, ry ei ea..: tun b.• ma P, Inr I..... nee end nrsrn;al or ! \.l. N Inr In .r• orJ.n ;ne. a r,u •r a Ir t. •,t .._ ., f ._ .. .. ^ llee'Prerfhty lea *eljaront i. ldenl:r n•r n•,d t .. t.el m:tr is ts':•p 11 r- rr., .. .. i.t. tile, of o-�.p tat c•• I ro ne,..nstrNC pr opertY u—rs sna 11 he rngnhM to•mul. llm rng ne .reed Carts rm.o l...1 n +:.a•�•t I -�..•, •e.,II Jev ^ nuurt Ir•, tb. IncI floc —to private Prrpnrtirs. nr borne be, the develore., r. _ - ,l 11-111 be den fgeerJ as a major viler c .r Yreeg itre�lt -n.1e1 i11 1 a n.,t lme or spf, to urb "eights, for. ,r, l al IYpe Jr Ill aI•pnrachci, rolled street ConnerttliI flood PletllNOn .ills, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled JrlYevays It properly line. _d. The Ial mr.rng [ln.en chain sb.n be instaued to me satisfaction of the City [n9 irrrcr: 9. A hyftalogic and era'een9e study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. p. pill Files 1 ♦X 1. Provid,r all .rtillty s rvfces In each lot Including sanitary 59.15 ester, elo,tric poem, and it flagae. - _ 2. All nU Ol m[ .r itl— per yrnjrct Sh, 11 be installed under......, encbellnq 'It n l It is along ntjar arterials less than 12 KV. 11 ). fit i l ity e slants sb a 11 be pr gv id^•1 to lilt utISf6Cl fall of the sr_e ving utility f p I-, , and the LEY Lp on,,. _ d. pwrinprr sh,11 be rr'.paasible for the r.Je.thed of f[IStln9 pvbIA ntll el nes, es egen ltd. • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting March 9, 1983 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jeff King called the regular meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning C =. ission to order at 7 p.m. The meeting was held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Chairman King then led in the pledge of allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout, carried Unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the regular adjourned meeting of February 17, 1983. t ✓F 0 k i ANNOUNCEMENTS Commissioner Rempel stated that the Planning Commissioners Institute which he and Commissioners Me Niel and Stout attended on March 2 -4, 1983, was the best . in the six years he has served as a Commissioner. Commisioncr Barker stated he would like to discuss the Design Review Committee procedure With the Planning Commission under the Director's Reports at the end of tonignt:; meeting. f f 1 • t PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -03 - CALMARK - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units /acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling, units /acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of land located west of Archibald, and north of date Line - APN 202 - 151 -34 (continued from Planning Commission meeting of February 23, 1983) . B. F.NV1RO'!M"eNTA1, ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOP'1ENT 83 -01 (PARCEL MAP 7827 CALMARK - A change of zone from R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) to R -3 /SO (Multiple Family Residential /Senior Overlay) and the development of 269 apartment units, of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres of land generally located west of Archibald and north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Nap 5792 - APN 202- 151 -34 (Continued from Planning Commission • meeting of February 23, 1983) . Chairman King indicated that items A and 0 would he considered together. Chairman Stout asked that item C also be added to the consideration. City Planner, Hick Gomez, reviewed the staff report outlining the concerns • raised by the Planning Commission at the last meeting. Further, that Larry Persons of Calmark was present with their consultants and were available to discuss the modified site plan. He indicated to the Commission that if they felt that Calmark was able to address the concerns raised at their last . meeting, affirmative action on this could be taken at this meeting. However, if the Commission was uncomfortable with Calmark's modifications, this could be continued to the Commission's March 23 meeting. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. John Husky, President of Calmark, stated that they would answer any questions put to them by the Commission, and that he would provide a historical perspective to the development of this project. Mr. Larry Persons, 2121 Cloverflled, Santa Monica, representing Calmark showed the modifications made to the project based on the suggestions made. He indicated that circulation was modified so that neither the market rate units or the senior citizen units would conflict. Further, that parking will be provided adjacent to the senior units but away from the general occupancy units so as not to deprive the senior citizens. Mr. Persons addressed the pitch of the stairs and the width of the sidewalks which would now accommodate a person and a wheelchair. Chairman King stated that in terms of ingress and egress, it appeared that • there is entrance on the far west and also in the middle of the project. Mr. Persons explained how entrance would be gained into the project and the emergency access for fire trucks, police, etc. Chairman King asked in terms of the middle entrance which is a ramp, is that intended to be a pedestrian path. Chairman King stated that it might be necessary to remove an extra parking space or two because he would hate to see someone on the ramp while carrying groceries coming in contact with a car. He indicated that there should be a clear delineation between the pedestrian access to the west and the middle and living areas, and that they should be free and clear. Mr. Persons replied that the pedestrian paths would be utilized within the green area and the problem described by Chairman King would not occur. Commissioner Stout asked Mr. Persons if he saw a need for pedestrian access from the market rate units to the shoppig center. Nr. Persons replied that it is not needed and that for the most part they will drive. Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 9, 1983 • 1814 • Commissioner Stout asked how their children would gain access to the shopping center. Mr. Persons replied that they are trying to prevent children from going through the senior project. He stated Luther that access is not intended for the general occupancy. Commissioner Stout asked if it would be possible to provide a pathway along a portion of the driveway for people to get to the shopping center from the market rate apartments. Mr. Persons replied that this would not be a problem. Chairman ;Sing asked if that would destroy Calmark's concept of a keyed access. Mr. Persons replied that it would not. Chairman King stated that a fence could be placed between the access and the buildings. Commissioner Hempel stated that on the point of keyed access, it means that anyone using the Sizzler or the bank would have to go all the way around in order to get into the complex. He indicated he did not feel this to be either feasible or good. Further, that access other than keyed must be provided. He suggested a special type of walkway in this area be delineated and that the • people in the market rate apartments should not be kept out. Mr. Persons asked if the west side access would be sufficient and explained how access could be Provided for everyone and yet restrict access through the senior project. • Commissioner Hempel stated that this would create a maintenance problem. Commissioner Barker stated that he was contused by what he had heard Commissioner Stout and Mr. Persons say relative to access at the west side and to the market rate apartments. He indicated that if it were a controlled access it would work. Commissioner Rempel stated that he lives on Base Line and to his east is a vacant lot with a 6-foot high chain link fence. He indicated that the children will scale the fence in order to cut across. Mrs. 'Wilma Brenner, representing the Rancho Cucamonga VIP Club, indicated that 15 percent of the people in the area are senior citizens in need of housing. She asked the Commission to act quickly on this project because they could not afford to wait. Commissioner Rempel ;asked Ctrs. Brenner how many cars are owned by the senior citizen; in her estimation? Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 9, 1983 I qS Mrs. Brenner replied that she does not have the figures but was fairly sure that if they are close to public transportation, they will get rid of their • cars and use the bus. She did not think that providing parking space was an important issue. Commissioner Hempel asked M•s. Brenner if she has visitors, and if so, where they would park. , M•s. Brenner replied that many elderly do not get visitors and when she toured other senior projects observed that there were ample parking spaces. Mrs. Brenner questioned if Commissioner Rempel was against the senior housing project. Commissioner Rempel stated that he was not against the senior housing and indeed was for it, but wanted to ensure that there would be adequate parking space. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Chairman King stated that the street design is far superior to the design presented the last time by Calmark. He felt that they had addressed the pedestrian walkways along the west side of the project and further, that the keyed access concept for the elderly units was proper and appropriate. He indicated that if the keyed access was vandalized, it could be dealt with in the future and could be changed. Chairman King stated that as he looked at the staff report and the modifications which had been made, he was comfortable with the project. • Commissioner Moliel asked if the Commission is talking about keyed access at both locations. Chairman King replied that they had talked about two and Commissioner Stout talked about another for the senior units and that those would not be keyed. He stated that he thought it was a good idea to have keyed access in the beginning because it may cut down on the likelihood of vandalism in terms of cars being parked in the southern area. Commissioner Stout stated that his general thoughts are that if only keyed access points are provided and there are no others, there may be a problem. However, if a choice is given of that and another access which is only slightly farther, they will select the unkeyed access and leave the locked access alone. Commissioner Barker asked as a point of clarification if Mr. Persons had said there was a reduction in density. Planning Commission Minutes -4- March 9, 1983 I9� • Mr. Persons replied that there is a reduction in the general occupancy units in the lower area and this was replaced by elderly units. Further, that compared to what is saved, the elderly units are not any greater but a little less while the general occupancy units are the sane. Commissioner Barker asked if-he is talking about number of units versus number of occupants. Mr. Persons replied that this is true. Commissioner Stout asked how much the rents will be in that area. Mr. Persons replied that preliminary costs have not yet been finally determined because they hinge on interest rates and if they are unable to get the financing they are trying for it would affect the rental costs. Further, that based on previous assumptions with an interest rate of 10 1/4 percent, it would be in the range of $300 for a two bedroom apartment and the high $300's for a three bedroom. Mr. Persons stated that there will be a mechanism to lower the rents and it was hoped that they will be able to lower the rates. Commissioner Stout asked what the rents will be for the market rate apartments. Mr. Persons replied that they will be in the low $400's and go up to $500- $5•5• Mr. Persons indicated that they will be working to receive block grant • money Iron the County and development agreements to reduce the fees. He indicated farther that a list is being prepared to explain this and it was his hope that the rents would end up in the low $300 range. rl Chairman :King asked if the Planning Commission is comfortable in voting on this project this evening. He also advised the Commission that staff had indicated that this could be continued to the next regular meeting. Mr. Persons asked the Commission if they could take action on this tonight. Chairman :King read the title of Resolution No. 83 -29 and stated that Commissioner Stout had asked for access to the market rate units through the elderly units and asked if it is more appropriate to add this to this resolution or the next one. W. Gomez replied it would be appropriate in the Planned Development Resolution. Commissioner Rempel asked that another condition be added to the Resolution that wherever in the Heritage Park project the walkway meets the curb, they will be ramped. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, to adopt the resolution and conditions as presented. Planning Commission Minutes -5- March 9, 1983 101 Commissioner Stout stated that in the area where it talks about number three, • some sort of maximum density should be set up. He indicated that it was 35.4 on the old project and he was not sure what it is presently but that it should be changed. Commissioner Stout asked if, as it is presently set up, is it under 35? Commissioner Rempel asked how many acres are in the revised portion Mr. Persons replied that it is around six acres. Commissioner Rempel stated that it should he limited to the number as shown on the plan. Mr. Gomez stated that it was what was shown on the concept of the General Plan Amendment and the 25 percent density bonus and in no case should it exceed that. Commissioner Barker stated that this action will not exceed what is shown. Commissioner Stout asked if architecture will be discussed at this time. Both Commissioners Barker and Hempel withdrew their motion to allow further discussion. Mr. Gomez stated that the number of units represented can be adopted. Commissioner Stout stated that he did not like the open stairway and asked if • the areas could be plastered in. Further, that he would like to see the fascia eniar3ed. Mr. Persons stated that Mr. Stout may have gotten the idea from a project they had done elsewhere; however, this would appear much blockier on site than it does in the picture. He indicated that doing this would create puddling and the water would be hard to drain. Commissioner King stated that he would be opposed to closing that in. Commissioner Barker stated that he disagreed with Commissioner Stout. Commissioner Nc Niel stated that this may create a hazard if there is puddling water. He also felt that the fascia could be increased a little. Mr. Persons stated that they culd put in more material, preferably wood, to coordinate with several other areas in the project. Commissioner Stout stated that what he wants is stucco to tie in the three areas and no understands the concern about the railing and he withdraws that. • Planning Commission Minutes -6- March 9, 1983 I6')� • Commissioner Rempel stated that the density as shown on the original plan submitted was 37 and that figure should not be exceeded. Further, if the six acres is a correct figure than this far exceeds the original density. Chairman King stated that in addition to those conditions stated, additional access will be provided on the west boundary from the market rate apartments. He stated further that the ramp area should be dealt with and the number of units should be limited to that originally proposed. Additionally, a condition should be added to have a stucco fascia as described by Commissioner Stout. Commissioner Stout asked if the last condition could be per the approval of staff. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -29 approving the environmental assessment and General Plan Amendment 83 -03. Chairman King stated that the Commission would move on to Item B, Tentative Parcel Map No. 7827. Rick Gomez stated that there would be one correction to the parcel map so that it conforms with the action taken on the first item. Mr. Hopson asked if that will be three parcels or two because you could not • have parcels one and two on the south side dividing the project in half. Commissioner Rempel stated that if the project conforms to the new map it will not divide the project in half. Mr. Gomez stated that the parcel line will be aligned to conform and it is up to the applicant. Mr. Persons stated that this is not a critical item and it will be adopted provided that parcel three take in the lower portion. Further, this would be for financing purposes only and the senior project will be separated from the market rate units. Commissioner Barker asked which parcel will be the first phase. Mr. Persons replied that it will be the southeast with the recreation building. Mr. Hopson stated that the development agreement would control the senior citizens portion of this project. Motion: Moved by Rempel seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No, 83 -30, approving Planned Development 83 -01, Parcel Map 7827, and issuing a Negative Declaration. 0 Planning Commission Minutes -7- March 9, 1983 ie-)9 Mr. Hopson asked if there would be an amendment to parcels one and two in section one. • Chairman King stated that with the amendment that Mr. Hopson had provided relative to parcels one and two, the Commission was ready to take action. Commissioner Rempel questioned the amendment to parcels one and two stating that parcel three was lower and should be changed to parcels one and three. Mr. Hopson stated that this could be done now or when the parcel map is submitted, the map could be renumbered with the southerly parcel being numbered first. Chairman King asked if the Commission should put in the wording ^senior citizen parcel" and add it to this section. Purther, the amendment to the General Plan land use plan describes this site as senior citizen parcel. Mr. Hopson replied that staff can put that in. Commissioner Stout stated that assuming that this is perfunctory and since the Planning Commission is recommending the General Plan amendment to the City Council should this not be contingent on the passage of that ordinance, otherwise the Commission would be granting an increase in density for no reason. Mr. Hopson stated that they will refuse this regardless of the recommendation. Commissioner Stout stated that perhaps that should be said. • Mr. Lam stated that there is a way of doing this by so stating in the minutes and further, that this does not have to be in the resolution. Mr. Hopson stated that the wording in the resolution being presented tonight refers specifically to Section 65361 of the Government Code and further, that any item can be changed if it is being done for an affordable project. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -31, approving Parcel Map 7827. 7:59 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed 8:15 p.m. The Planning Commission renonvened • # # • ! D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7812 - PENBO. INCORPORATED - A residential subdivision of .585 acres within the R -1 zone into 3 parcels located on the south side of Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue - APN 208 - 851 -09, 10. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of February 9, 1983.) • Planning Commission Minutes -8- March 9, 1983 ono • ORDINANCE NO. * -;! 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 151 -34 DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 7827, AND LOCATED NEST OF ARCHIBALD AND NORTH OF BASE LINE, FROM R -3 /PD TO R -3 /SO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. R. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessor's Parcel Number 202 - 151 -34, a portion thereof, described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7827, approximately 4.55 acres in size and generally located west of Archibald and north of Base Line, is hereby changed from R -3 /PO (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) to R -3 /SO (Multiple Family Residential /Senior Overlay). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Reoort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 70� 0 i�L 1] M1 t1( A TK^T TIT i AC9 STAFF REPORT I- DATE: April 6, 1983 C.; !i> 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Request to Continue Public Hearing for the Vacation of a portion of 7th Street located on the south side of 7th Street, east side of Center Avenue California Finished Metals has indicated that they would like to bond for the street improvements on 7th Street and has requested that the public hearing for the vacation of a portion of 7th Street be continued from the March 16, 1983 meeting until May 18, 1983. This will allow the developer time to work out details with their main office located in Chicago. Respectfully submitted, LBH: n (� cc' a CITY OF RANCHO CCCAAIONGA sic .try STAFF REPORT ?y. z� DATE: March 16, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Vacation of a Portion of 7th Street California Finished Metals, Inc., has requested the City vacate the portion of 7th Street no longer required by the Industrial Specific Plan. At the present time, 7th Street between Center and Haven Avenue is 60 feet wide with an additional 14 foot offer of dedication on the south side adjacent to California Finished Metals, Inc. This makes the present half width of 7th Street at the site 44 feet, Since the industrial Specific Plan (SubArea 5) reduces this right -of -way to a half width of 27 feet, 17 feet remains to be vacated. The existing curb and gutter has been constructed quite some time ago. With the reduction in street width, these existing improvements must be removed. California Finished Metals will remove the existing improvements and replace them in the new location or bond for such work before the vacation is recorded. Planning Commission has reviewed this vacation at their meeting of February 23, 1983 and recommended that Staff forward it to City Council. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the summarily vacation of a portion 7th Street and authorizing the City Clerk to record said resolution. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:jaa Attachments TO BE VACATED w a cc w F- z LL) U E \ CITY OF RANCI IO CUCAMONG A ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINI9'Y NIAI' w a z w a x tla.: A N - -- - SUBAREA 5 (Continued) F.' 12 14'1 12 13" 12" 14' 12" 64'It RR'n now 5114 121'112114M 1 64'11. R W C Right -Of -Way - Archibald 88' Right -Of -Way - 6th 74' Right- Of-Way - Turner 54' Right -Of -Way - 7th 8th K a:>•:�v1u�— Center and all other local streets sw,l 2x't , nit h5'n. 4a'n 1 54'11 ROW M in inum Parc 01 Size One (1) acre IV -25 0 n J • FIG. IV -5 CIRCULATION r!3= 130' R.O.W. 100' R.O -W. � BS' or bss R.O.W. '1- Y'1-Y-Y EaislYp TRAILS /ROUTES O O O O Veaearlan 09041 aicycle ,��G Re0ional MutGUSe - -"" Special Strestscaoe/ Land5C0RjlJ .....- ...- ........ Rower Line/ .................... Otsty Easement lr•' �e Creeks A Channels U Boo" n .� Access Vants OFie Station' OSherrill Station O C00' BOOT 1600r • • Nate: Parcel lines an l bt conllpmalbns ate shown as aaero.imatlan day. The sties shown may not he currently mend nnr 1. the Iocatldn site soecHlc. The dedctWh of a site Is an inaicati.n oI a Wt iectea ltdve hoed that may be adjusted over trne as the City de.el a . e Pro. v C / � � i�l 'I I '� CAIIFC RPILI FMISH EO �IEL4lS. :NC, • 9133 CENTER AVE., CVCAMONGA CA. 91730 (714) 987-4681 dft January 25, 19e3 i��t�'l.i 1983 wy of RANGNO CUCAMONGA Cit1 of Fanchc Cucamonga pNGINlEM1iNG 0111 SION F.C. Box 207 Fe. nchc ,'ucamcnca, • ^A. 91730 Attent ion: Ya.:1 F.cuaeau Enclosed a e ec Pies of documents requested Ly your office in order to proceed in cur request for vacation of a rortion of 7th Street. As a result cf our telephone conversation, these documents are su,71'ed instead of the information requested in Ncverh. r by Barbara ra11. Very truly year:, • CALIPC PI.jA .-_..1SHi::. ::ETALS, IJ.. G.L. Hemencver, General Manager GLP. /c Enclosures.: 1. cull - econveyance 2. Tnaiividual Grant Deed - (2) 3. Yarn: ^1 mar. 4. Check Fj • RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF 7TH STREET 'WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 3330, of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of the City street hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that a portion of 7th Street is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: The Council hereby makes its order vacating that portion of street on Map V -025 on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part • thereof. SECTION 2: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said portion of 7th Street no longer constitutes a street or public utility easement. SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 16th day of March, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. 'dasserman, City Clerk don D. Mikels, Nayor EXHIBIT "A' PARCEL A The parcels of land as described in the deed of the offer of dedication of an easement to the County of San Bernardino for highway and road purposes as recorded in Book 7066, Page 103, official records of the said County, as the said offer of dedication is also shown in Parcel Map No. 1892 as recorded in Book 26, Page 32 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. PARCEL B The southerly 3 feet of 20th Street (also known as 7th Street), 60 feet wide, as shown on said Parcel Map No. 1392 lying between the east right -of -way line of Center Avenue and the east boundary line of the said Parcel Map No. 1892. l' 0 oq 0 • • 0 • 43 nrmv nc n e nrnvn nnn n r.rnXrn e STAFF REPORT Chi 9 <9 s C. tryl DATE: April 6, 1983 F TO: City Council and City Manager 197 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer's BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Ordering Annexation No. 12 for Tract 10045 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 12 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract 10045 located on Haven Avenue north of Hidden Farm Road. Westland Venture Company, developer of Tract 10045, has been notified of the public hearing by mail. Posting at the site has also been completed. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report which was tentatively approved by Resolution No. 83 -24 on March 2, 1983. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the subject annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. Respectfully submitted, LBH2:jaa Attachments U 16 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, I ANNEXATION NOJZ TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 10045 • IN '!HE U/Y OF RANCHO CUCArdONGA COUNTY OF SAN 9EVNF40, 4'0 5TA >E OF CAL1100MIA 1 ne v.ue•eu n r erea.. +ua :I uo. ' a rrrr A- -1 „re re, ✓asr • :,• -- -- _ 1 i s a , . ^ _.I a eP H ASS E / r — .4 ol1l 11ioi� title: �. (ITI' OI' RAtiC;I IO CC'CANIO1GA f-pC)oauf A 32 ENGINEERING MVISION N �LL�• = VICINITY NIAP page )!I 1WWWESTLAND VENTURE COMPANY 9 • r--1 LJ December 23, 1982 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: TRACT 10045 In accordance with City policy and our conditions of approval for Tract 10045, we hereby indicate our willingness to join the Landscape Maintenance and Lighting District as established by Resolution No. 79 -81 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A.W.J. 81, at al BY: z7r-2 ; r-- San A. Angona, a general partner SAA /7g 1152 NORTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE SUITE 104 UPLAND, CALI FOR N IA 91786 714/981.0228 C7l1. - 'V_7- . March 23, 1983 P 399161 5 23 RECEIPT FOR CCRI Fda, NO INS'JPANGE CGVERAGF.SFOVi;Ea- CITY OF RANCHO CT . NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL PA,L •Srr H<ve.an • xaw.Jen O. Likely I smnn ...e.�a I Westland Venture Co. I s:.„t .na rrnNn. c RIFh.,d .EdR Jan 1152 N..Mountain2vp— .Ste lr7 Nic hard \I. Uahi Phil liF ja , U1 Westland Venture Company 1152 North Mountain Avenue Suite 104 Upland, California 91766 Attn: Sam Angona Subject: Ordering Annexation No for Tract 10045 Gentlemen _. -_and) CA 9178_6 Cem6•E Fe. I � Ra n Pec 5now•np �, o.:e. col ge:wrn TOTAL Postage and Fem IS PO•tmerk ar Oete 12 to Landscape NI On April 6, 1923, the City Council will be holding a public hearing to discuss the annexation of your development, Tract 10045, to Landscape Maintenance • District No. 1. The meeting will be held at 7:30 prn in the Forum at the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, ,Rancho Cucamonga. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call this office, Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION BARBARA KRALL Engineering Technician BK:jaa 013 4.198 BASF:I.IVF; 111/,1n, SPITE C • POST OFF'If h: IlgY9117 • N \x!'110 CI'f, \AOSr,.6 f. \LIFl112VI: \PI iA4 • I7In4P4•IP3I Vr RESOLUTION NO. • A R'SOL'UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAGIONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION 'WITH ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT NO. 10045 'dHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 2nd day of '.larch, 1983, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 83 -24 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 83 -24 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 83 -24 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidvait of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of • Intention No. 83 -24, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the district and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 83 -24, be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer Ti�bereby finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessmentt in—thr Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unt i, after 60 percent of said tracts have been occupied. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. oIq • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION NO. 12 to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Tract 10045 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 10045 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the Tract Map as roadway right-of—day or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Tract 10045. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission. Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Map and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that :.maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based an actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 12 comprised of 9700 square feet of landscaped area) is shown below: Total Annual Maintenance Cost Is 5.30 ( 211,046 square feet $31,313.80 6 Engineers Report Annexation No. 12 Per Lot Annual Assessment • 81,313.80 44.43 1830 Per Lot Monthly Assessment 44.43 = 12 3.70 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced by the amount saved by the District due to said homeowner maintenance. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Imroveent lots withinm the Districtx and o that assessmentnsshallbbe equalefor each f parcel. • The City Council will hold a public hearing in June, 1983, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the 1982/83 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year in 'lay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. • .� I �-- — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GLCAAlfji, STAFF REPORT F DATE: April 6, 1983 is% TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FRO;?: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Rick Marks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 1983 -84 ABSTRACT: This report contains information describing the status of the City's current Community Development Block Grant Program Projects and pursuant to federal regulations governing the program, provides information describing proposed community projects for the 1983 -1984 program year. BACKGROUND: In August of 1974, President Ford signed the Omnibus • Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 charting an entirely new course for the nation's housing and urban aid programs. The new law consolidated 10 different categorical aid programs into a locally adminsitered block grant program and contained broad revisions in the formulas for distributing federal aid. The Community Development Block Grant Program has as its primary objectives the enhancement and maintenance of viable urban communities through the provision of decent housing and a suitable living environment and the expansion of economic opportunities, rp inci aP lly for low and moderate income persons. The act provides financial assistance for community activities directed toward: A. Eliminating slums and blight, preventing deterioration of property, and providing needed neighborhood and community facilities; B. Eliminating conditions which are detrimental to health, safety and public welfare through interim rehabilitation, code enforcement, etc.; C. Conserving and expanding housing stock for all, but principally for low and moderate income persons; D. Expanding and improving the quantity and quality of community services, principally for low and moderate income persons; E. A more rational utilization of land and other natural resources; F, Reducing the isolation of income groups within communities and geographical areas; �'11 Community Development Block ., .t Program 1983 -84 City Council Agenda April G, 1983 Page 2 G. Restoring and preserving properties of special value for historic, architectural or aesthetic reasons; and, H. Alleviating physical and economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization in area=- with popultion outmigration or stagnating or declining tax base. Entitlement Cities: The Community Development Block Grant Program automatically entitles cities with a population greater than 50,000 to block grants. The amount of the block grant received by an entitlement city is based an a five -part formula reflecting the ratio of a particular community's population, extent of housing overcrowding, poverty, age of housing, and growth lag to the averaga figures for all similar communities. Public He aring: Under the regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program cities are required to hold a public hearing in order to give citizens an opportunity to respond to staff recommendations for program funding. The public hearing you are holding tonight meets the federal • requir =_rents and will allow staff to continue processing our Block Grant application. Last month the City released for public review and comment a Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives which described the federal Community Development Block Grant Program and the programs that staff recommended for Block Grant funding. The Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives was distributed at the Neighborhood Center, Lions Park Community Center, Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library and at City Hall. File copies were placed in the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library. Because of their stated interest, a copy was either mailed to or hand delivered to the president of the VIP Club and the chairman of the North Town Citizens Participation Advisory Committee. Federal regulations require that the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives be available for public review for a minimum of 30 days prior to the public hearing on them and the proposed CDBG Program. Staff circulated the Statement in early ^arch and invited public comments or requests for funding at that time. The City published legal notices announcing the public hearing on two days - '1;rch 18, 1983 and March 24, 1983, both of which ran in The Dail LRort newspaper. Additionally, a three - quarter page spread describing the City's CO3G Program and the public hearing ran on page 4 of the Sprinq 1783 issue of the City Newsletter, The Grapevine, which was mailed to approximately 20,000 households in the City. r1 U �c Community Development Block Grant Program 1983 -84 North Town Street Improvements - Phase III This project was the third and final segment of a multi -year street improvement program begun when the City was a part of the San Bernardino County Cooperating Cities Program. This portion of the overall project included improving Center and Marine Streets between 26th Street and Humboldt Avenue. Activities included: earthwork, removals, paving, drainanP pipe and structures, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches and manhole adjustments. This project was completed several months ago and within budget. Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center Expansion This is a two year project approved by the City Council last year at the public hearing. The project involves constructing a new wing to the already existing City- oa4ned Neighborhood Center for the primary use of senior citizens. The structure as approved is to include one large community room, two meeting rooms, full commercial kitchen, lavatories, storage area and paved parking. The project was divided into two phases, to be funded over a two year perind. Phase 1, the phase we are now in, included land purchase and emruieerinq of the project. Phase It is the actual construction of i:npriv.�ments. �1 n City Council Agenda April 6, 1983 Page 3 Current Pra rq am: Last year at the public hearing on the COBS Program the City Council aproved the following costs and projects for funding: Progran Amount % 1. North Town Streets $120,000 33.3% Phase III 2. Neighborhood Center $ 81,000 22.5% Expansion - 3. Housing Rehabilitation $ 84,000 23.3% 4. Contingency $ 17,387 4.8% 5. Local Costs - Program Implementation (a) Administration $ 6,255 1.7% (b) Program Management $ 510,3580 114% At a later date the City Council amended this budget to provide funding for a contract for fair housing services with the Inland Mediation Board in the amount of $2,975. North Town Street Improvements - Phase III This project was the third and final segment of a multi -year street improvement program begun when the City was a part of the San Bernardino County Cooperating Cities Program. This portion of the overall project included improving Center and Marine Streets between 26th Street and Humboldt Avenue. Activities included: earthwork, removals, paving, drainanP pipe and structures, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches and manhole adjustments. This project was completed several months ago and within budget. Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center Expansion This is a two year project approved by the City Council last year at the public hearing. The project involves constructing a new wing to the already existing City- oa4ned Neighborhood Center for the primary use of senior citizens. The structure as approved is to include one large community room, two meeting rooms, full commercial kitchen, lavatories, storage area and paved parking. The project was divided into two phases, to be funded over a two year perind. Phase 1, the phase we are now in, included land purchase and emruieerinq of the project. Phase It is the actual construction of i:npriv.�ments. �1 n Community Development Block Grant Program 1983 -84 City Council Agenda April 6, 1993 Page 4 'We are currently involved in negotiations with Chino Basin Municipal Water District, the owner of the property south of the existing Neighborhood Center, and as yet have not reached agreement on a price for the property. The CBMWD Board is meeting April 13, 1983 and at that time will determine whether or not to accept the City's latest offer for the property. Once the land is purchased, staff estimates that the design and engineering can be accomplished within three (3) months. Housing Rehabilitation Program: The Housing Rehabilitation Program consists of two (2) parts - a Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program and a Senior Repair Grant Program. The Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program operates with the City conducting an initial search for and screening of potential applicants and, per a contract with the County of San Bernardino, the County doing the detailed paperwork and working with a private sector lender to qualify the applicant for a loan. If an applicant qualifies, they are offered a low interest loan with the City "writing down" the interest using federal funds in order to keep payments affordable to them. Applicants • qualify based on income, number of family members, "credit worthyness ", need, and location in the City (per federal environmental law). T'ne Senior Repair Grant program offers a 11,000 non - repayable grant to senior citizens, disabled and handicapped people who meet income and location requirements. Both programs require that the money be spent on bringing housing units up to City code and on repairing health and safety problems. To date, because of the sluggish economy, cities are experiencing a low nunber of requests for Rehabilitation Loans; Rancho Cucamonga is no exception. The Los Angeles Area Office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, housing consultants, local cities, and the County of San Bernardino all report that the number of applications for loans are down this year. Last year Rancho Cucamonga set as a goal the issuance of nine (9) loans. To date we have had ten applicants; four were ineligible, two qualified, and four are being processed. The Senior Repair Program's goal is twenty -one (21) repair loans; to date we have had twenty -one applications and completed work on nine of them; eight others are being procn..ssed and four were found to be ineligible. Local Costs of Program Implementation The costs of actually running the CDBG Program are paid out of Federal • 310-'x ;rant fun45 and are limited by law to a maximum of 20 percent of the total award. The City set aside money for staff and program costs and to date we are well below the administrative maximum allowed. �n Community Development Block Grant Program 1983 -84 City Council Agenda April u, 1933 Page 5 u0jeccnves: Last year at the public hearing held on the CDBG Program, the City Council determined that expansion of the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center was a high priority project and would be funded over a two year period. Additionally, federal law creating the CDBG Program, and federal regulations governing it, require that a city receiving these funds must make a significant effort toward providing housing opportunities, eliminating housing deterioration and providing safe neighborhoods for low and moderate income people. The Council recognized this and approved the existing Housing Rehabilitation Program. These two programs - the Neighborhood Center Expansion Program and the federal requirement to put a significant amount of effort and money into housing - basically shape staff's recommendations for the City's 1983 -84 program. The City has been informed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development that it may expect to receive $437,000 next year. • Based upon the above information and last year's direction from the Council, staff recommends the following program budget for next year. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM: Proposed Budget 1983 -84 Budget Year Program Amount % of Total 1) Neighborhood Center Expansion $297,000 68 *2) Housing Rehabilitation Loan/ 70,000 (90,000) 15 Senior Citizen Repair Grant Program 3) Local Costs - Program Implementation (a) Administration 5,000 (b) Program Management 55,000 (c) Fair Housing Services 5,000 (d) Contingency 5,000 $ 70,000 16 TOTAL $437.000 100 *nn id rlicion t' 7� Uob is avaiTahl•a fur HousTno ReeTiaoi nation from a carryortr 3rco,int established when the City was part of the Cooperating Cities Progre•n of San Bernardino County. This will allow actual expenditures for this program to be 'x90,000. i Community Development Block Grant Program 1983 -84 City Council Agenda April 6, 1983 Page 6 Any Toney that is unspent by the City at the end of the current program year will be available for use by the City next year. If there is any unspent money, staff will bring a proposed amended budget to the City Council for its review and adoption. Next Steps: If the City Cuncil adopts the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives as proposed, the following items must then be accomplished in order to submit our request for funding by June 1, 1983: Action o Revise and circulate Statement of Comnunity Objectives as approved by City Council (now called Final Statement of Community Objectives) (Minimum of 30 days) o Housing Assistance Plan due at Los Angeles HUD office o Public review of Final Statement of Community Objectives o First year Performance Report o Submit Application to HUD (hand deliver) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o Environmental Review of Projects (if necessary) 9 Date of Completion April 8, 1983 April 15, 1983 May 8, 1983 • May 30, 1983 May 30, 1983 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - April 7 - May 30, 1983 RECWMENOATIONS: Staff recommends the following actions: A. That the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the CoinTunity Development Block Grant Program as described in the Preliminary Statement of Community objectives; B. That staff be. authorized to continue processing the City's Comnunity Developnent Block Grant application as outlined, Re sec tf111y�eu bini Cted, y i11 C'x lVnineZ ' -.. .. .. City planner RG:R'1Ur Attachments 9 : 01- I • Is L8 The Dail /Report/Friday, March 18,1983 Public Notice public Notice Cont_ Public No F, SPRING 1983 GRAPEVINE ti.. Y_ Car -ge gyp:- . • `t• ^`: ... - .�.�.. -J.._ . ...�. �-a `...'gift _. ... Park Reconatmctlon —The plan rag iieb! areas ar A;t,+ Loma Pu'e Inramd on Semi A.'enue nnnh of 191h Suco are being r,cs a.e, and eeCt'd w prOVife a TOre C. ;Ian, a,l riforu, pia \ "n: surfa,c Thp prn!er1 area 'r:1 'ee flnc,d it'd :1, µid I be emo . o e Too alo d s to be I .I'• for "'I, red A sea rhe ec ear .areas roi.nd rharpl -,g field are cp fof our emo9ment Block Grant Program: Enhance and Maintain Community Activities Entitlement Cities The Comuounur. ilewa npmem Block Grant Program automaccnlh an!;!],, eiaee scup a p,pu!Ivuo sroatar than 50.M10 w Hoek grant, l'he amount of the block 5ronl rcco'svd by an Ennile. ment Cm' is hewr: on a hue part formula rvft,cinq :bit mno of a Panic - ular tutee"":" , punulauon. extent of i:nosmg ns rrmi"!.'T I poverty. ago o.`hnusng.andnro thligmthcavar age f'gerrs !nr all s.:a'.: x rn,v:m untlics Last q.n r, hevou.r the 19Nn Census it i'npul at:' I, coeduu,d 's Our irris•r al': :nrn,ment ronh fell d that the aW Ira pnouum one .mss o1517. 01) 0. 15„ :v a,,ur I i, Ent',tle . m„nt the a 974 the .I ,, ae ns gos'- „r�ng the Pq3 Huocnn and Conn main" Uevelnprnent Ac: Thy allows th,• crry to soled I! '.r Prommea It de sums to it and ollnsys It to as<ume 'rdmnr gar .I,' amrrol mar them Eligibility HI,,i late o ns C'ndur req.rL :nuns i. o- ;l he HUD 27 i ouryone. of eledo l,• , r,,..uus 'Fli.e iv ran �'niinnt',, :u and nesrrsa' 'I :Ly,bie , '11111 IT ,.P'r„ r., nc n,.,: pr, i.I ,m ;' ;�,. r., ,6r i r ., I , .. ,. ni. ,,.ir„ :0 it ,,n..',nor ,.; r I o f OT" t t i,., •,tit ' grants mat' do so at the Commuri Davelopmenr Depanment. 9320 Base Line Rp9d Community Objectives Federal gmdeh,nes require that gibes receiving Community Development Bloc', Grant money publish o store. meat of comrnunny oblecnvas to such a manner as to afford anzens an oppnrrumly' to esammc its rontont and to submit comment to the c regsri mg the proposed 9atement anrd on th., enmmunt, deeedopment per Inrmncre of tho ;I% City staff has prepared a P,,] w. man' <to l u m e c of Co. m snits' 0 hM6 nse. ndaat 1g: the k.:rd' of + m •'s Ranch,: Cucamonga has and me prry gmrna't"d, need In hr fur'!, J Th, " proevams that ha,.e been recon,.. rnendvd to recent funding are as (ollr,us in pnor't, order 'fl:, ng P.,Wbduounn V'rmi :Souvmr! Canb'r Exnancinn IPon:acly for smug , t :,tna Th, t'.I,: vneouran.:' penal., N p:, k p a rnpc of th,. F,,ci,. in...,,!t, c...... mill „f l', eirnonna r)hivcm „sal Crty H,dl Public fifes ring i t, :1pr, 11.1 it 7- :0 m. the t'lliirr pn,gnnn In oiler to e I om:nen:s o•y.v,I rI,; { :,, {,. -',i hnnrm „m of C man im I. aI!,n gua r,rn'n. an I. t„ Pr nth.' pro I,,r ho, 1 ng riih.• ,.ip,r rm .eI' I„ atn'r'! an,! I1,111 It it n ( e, ('I ,'. ar.mi Ilse 1 u,'l 1 .1 of Pr... n I. r,", i an4 ii,od n I:, - ,ynr,i air r)Inn :b.s I(,m.mi it r4” !/ Comrnunln' Cevelopament Act of 1974 chi ning an enere:y nest course for the nation's housing and urban a',d programs. The re, lac,' consolidated ten different catagor . cal aid prof. ems into a locally adm:nalere; Block Gm,m Program and contained broad rest sons in the formula, for drstnbutmg federal aid. The Communit ;% Develope'nant Block Grant Program bas as ns prima: r, ohitcnvas the enhancement ant jW mnmmnancc of v,able urban co:r:ry . tunas through the pros, s, on of hous:ay and a su:tab:c P,omg crs', to I. III and the expans'on of ecorrn :c op Pnrfonities, pnnclpa :.'J for loss Inc: moderate income persons T::.' act prrn:des hnanctal r.ss :stanrc for car,•,. munil, ictivines dueled tov.'erd 'Elin- mating slums and bl,gi ::, pre. venfng dcrenormion of prnpcm'. and p,e,,d.:ng needed neryhborhood n,m rnunnt' fac16bes, 'F.I',nvnanng mndu:ons sshich are Jib nnwnlal In health . sat,:, and public uei(am Ihrnugh inwnm n hahri,:aM1On. rnd� enforcement, etc 'Conunung and cxpm'dmy slack far all. but prat can, Ilv for Ira and m, vleouv :ncnm.• f ,r•ru s. •A gam' rwai,ol ut.,,:.I: m of land and ntdu'r natural as cis 'R, dunng the Snbg. '. of mcoma ge "'t"s snh',n rnmlmr. „',. s and geo grapnrcol areas, Rest,.. nq ,aid prr.rr.Tl prrperna+ of .pa ' al value ,,r I,.. ;,lie eahurc tr r Ih n,. r•. �. \". i nd {hs ic,l and scan ,T t.irvs. it. ughl ..,i a it"'in .ale :,...tmaN nn,i �, tai, ,., Ir sJli l' +t.6•i t, PTiin i r g r C Cell LOW INTEREST HOME REPAIR LOANS Is your home in need of repairs? Does your roof leak? Does the plumbing need replacing? Point peel- ing? Are interest rates too high to allow you to borrow the money you need to fix your house the way you would like? Why not let the City help you finance those needed repairs and in turn you will help the City preser-a its housing and neighborhoods. As Pori n1 the City's Housing Rehabilitation Loan P1.9mm it i, Possible 10 borrow money for home repairs at reduced interest rates. The Housing Reha- bilitation Loan Program looks to the future of the City : a the belief that keeping housing and neighborhoods o good shape is the most effective way to maintain the health of the City. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is offering home repair loans and grants to qualified City resident, who wish to repair healith and safely problems in their homes. If you qualify you may borrow up to $15,000 for - !r1m of up to 15 years at reduced inter- est rates; senior citizens, handicapped or disabled home ci,vnars may receive up to $1,000 ft.e at charge. YOU ARE OUALIFIED FOR A REHABILITATION HOME LOAN IF: 11 You live wilhir, one of the shaded areas on the map and 21 You have owned the house to be repaired for 12 an-alhs or longer and 31 You meet income requirements. YOU AREOUALIFIED FOR THE SENIOR CITIZENS REPAIR GRANT IF: You ore 60 years old, handicapped or disabled and meet the above 3 criteria. FOR MORE INFORMATION If you ... Interested in this Program and would like more information about it, call the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 989-1851. it 1. .t I _ f 4 _s =.o o == ✓�E a� _u�Z 5� 3� trv�° ZO E�'a eJ uZi��r iiv QZ jVa v'iCaJVlly ZCj.N -. I Pu o.? Nv�c w DfM xU OW w V °yam - -�o9u n cm f o ova;, c o j2 ,SEE H�a.n COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I -, 41' MARCH 1983 11977 rr . ,I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,o. -- %4 %r) . y� .W.,,Jon D. Vikeb Charles J. Bu9u el II James C. Frost Richard M. Dahl Phillip D. Schlosser February 14, 1983 TO: RESIDENTS OF THE CITY Ti)e Community Cevelopment Block Grant Program is a federally funded, City administered effort designed to improve and enhance the quality and safety of City neichborhoods. Every year, the City prepares an application to the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development in order to secure funding for local programs aimed at improving housing and building needed community facilities. In the last several years, the City has repaired City streets, rehabilitated dozens of houses and constructed the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center with Block Grant funds. One of the most critical steps in this year's Community Development Block Grant application process is the staff completion and public response to a Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives indicating the projects /programs that the City believes ought to be funded with Block Grant money. Based on • Public testimony gathered at a required public hearing, the Preliminary State,:ent of Community Objectives will be revised if necessary and submitted to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as part of the application for funding. The Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives is attached along with other background inforation concerning the Community Development Block Grant in Rancho Cucamonga. On April 6, 1983, at its regular meeting, the City Council will hold a public hearing to discuss the Preliminary Statement of Objectives and the Cemmunity Development Block Grant Program. The public is invited and encuuraged to attend and ask questions, comment on suggested programs, or put forward ctner proposals for program funding. Project Proposal Forms may be pinked up at Citv Hall for those groups or individuals wishing to submit a request for funding to the City Council. Pr000sal Fords should to returned to the Community Development Department by "arch 28, 1983. If you have dry questions or concerns regarding the Community Development Block Grant Prrn-am, please call Rick !,larks, Citv of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division, at lJ 97 ?0 IL \SE 1.1 S1: RO.1 D, Sl'ITh; C POST OFFICE BOX 807 • ItA%CIIO CCCA510 \OA. C,\I.IFORV1:1 91710 • (7111989.1851 .7 10 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES • I. NEEDS ASSESSMENT FINDING: There is a need to continue City efforts to improve existing housing stock that does not meet building or safety code re- quirements yet is basically sound and can, with some improve- ment efforts, continue to serve the housing needs of the City. OBJECTIVE: To develop a program capable of eliminating and preventing slums, blight, and conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare that can aid in preserving housing stock for people of low and moderate income. PROGRAM STATEMENT: Housing Rehabilitation Establish a Housing Rehabilitation Program that will offer below- market interest rate home loans to persons /families of low -or- moderate income and home improvement grants for minor projects to senior citizens and disabled or handicapped persons. Activities funded would include: • - Outreach /public information - Home improvement loans - Home repair grants (senior citizen, disabled, handicapped persons) II. NEEDS ASSESSMENT FINDING: There is a need within the City to provide an accessible five - day per week activity for an increasingly identifiable and active senior citizen population. OBJECTI'JE: To expand and improve the quantity and quality of community services, provide needed neighborhood and corrmunity facilities and reduce the ISOI,1 inn of senior citizens living within the city, ST;TEMENT: Neighl,onhood Center Expansion (Pricmr'ily for Senior Citizen activities) Construct a separate wing to the already existing City -owned �tignborhood Center for the primary use of senior citizens. In addition to hostin activities, the structure must be able to serve as a staning area for the delivery of services and information vital to senior citizens. Such a structure should include the following features: - one larue com ;inity room - lavatories two reeting rooms - storage area - full commercial kitchen - paved parking 0 Statement of Community Objectives Federal guidelines require that cities receiving Community Development Block Grant money publish a Statement of Community Objectives in such a manner as to afford citizens an opportunity to examine its content and to submit comments to the City regarding the proposed statement and on the community development performance of the City. The City has prepared a Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives indicating the kinds of needs Rancho Cucamonga has and the programs that have been recommended to receive funding are as follows, in priority order: o Housing Rehabilitation o Neighborhood Center Expansion (Primarily for Senior Citizen activities) The City encourages people to pick up a copy of the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives at City Hall. Preliminary Estimate of CDBG Award for 1983 -1984 - $437,000.00 • PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 6, 1983, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CDBG PROGRAM IN ORDER TO HEAR THE PUBLIC'S COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES AND TO GIVE CITIZENS AN OPPORTUNITY TO PROPOSE OTHER PROGRAMS FOR FUNDING. THE PUBLIC IS ENCOURAGED TO ATTEND AND MAKE THEIR VIEWS KNOWN TO THE CITY COUNCIL. BASED ON TESTIMONY RECEIVED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE FINAL LIST OF PROJECTS WILL BE DRAFTED AND USED IN THE APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. i • • BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM In August of 1971, President Ford signed the omnibus Housing and Community Development Act o` 1974, charting an entirely new course for the nation's housing and urban aid programs. The new law consolidated ten different categorical aid programs into a locally administered Block Grant Program and contained broad revisions in the formulas for distributing federal aid. The Community Development Block Grant program has as its primary objectives the enhancement and maintenance of viable urban communities through the provision of decent housine and a suitable living environment and the expansion of economic opportunities, principally for low and moderate income persons. The act provides financial assistance for community activities toward: o Eliminating slums and blight, preventing deterioration of property, and providing needed neighborhood community facilities; o Eliminating conditions which are detrimental to health, safety and public welfare through interim rehabilitation, code enforcement, etc.; o Conserving and expanding housing stock for all, but princi- pally for low and moderate income persons; o Expanding and improving the quantity and quality of community • services, principally for low and moderate income persons; o A mcre rational utilization of land and other natural resources; 19 o Reducing the isolation of income groups within communities and geographical areas; o Restoring and preserving properties of special value for historic, architectural or aesthetic reasons; and,' o Alleviating physical and economic distress through the stimulation of private investment and community revitalization in areas with population outmigration and stagnating or declining tax base. Entitler-nt Cities The Coureuniry Development Block Grant Program automatically entitles cities with a population greater than 50,000 to block grants. The amount of the block grant rocn.ivod by an entitlement city is based on a five -part formula reflecting the ratio c i ;articuLnr cow;nuni ty's population, extent of housing overcrowdi nr„ Pow'rt;, a,:o ousing, and growth lag to the average figures for all similar u ..,. miUCS. q r Program Eligibility Regulations Under regulations issued by HUD (Dated August 27, 1979), there are six (6) basic categories of eligible activities: 1) Basic eligible activities; 2) eligible rehabilitation and preservation activities; 3) eligible economic development activities; 4) eligible activities by private non- profit entities, neighborhood -based non- profit organization, local development corporations, or small business investment companies; 5) eligible planning and urban environmental design costs, and; 6) eligible administrative costs. An explanation of each of the categories of eligible activities is given below. Two points, however, should be noted. First, the following list is condensed from the regulations and is simplified; the final decision as to whether a project is eligible or not should be made by referring directly to the regulations. Second, any eligible project must meet the criteria of A. Basic Eligible Activities This section includes the majority of capital improvement projects which may be considered for funding within designated target areas. 1. Acquisition of Real Property which does not meet current building code standards, which may be preserved as a historic • site or valuable community service, or used for an eligible activity. 2. Discosition of Real Property acquired under the CDBG Program. 3. Acouisition, Construction, Rehabilitation, or Installation of certain publically owned facilities, such as: a. Senior Centers b. Parks, Playgrounds c. Centers for the Handicapped d. Neighborhood Facilities e. Solid Waste Disposal Facilities f. Fire Protection Facilities and Equipment g. Parking Facilities h. Street Improvements i. dater and Sewer Systems j. Pedestrian halls and Walkways k. Flood Control and Drainage Improvements 1. Other improvements vital to a community's development. Cl- !nr,!nce and "ennlition of deteriorated buildings and land wriicn rzay be a health Hazard to the community. 5. Interi_, Assistance or temporary help to alleviate hazard or d.;n ;r.rcus conditions, such as the repairing of streets, Playgrounds • or private. property, or trash and garha,e removal. n ',O 6. Relocation Payents for any person displaced from their homes . due to CDBG funded activity or for loss of rental income. 7. Removal of Architectural Barriers that restrict the mobility of handicapped persons. B. Eligible Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities Under this section CDBG funds may be used for the rehabilitation of buildings and improvements, both public and privately owned. This section of the regulations authorizes the County's acquisition of, and rehabilitation financing for, private properties; it also provides for temporary relocation assistance, code enforcement, and historic preservation activities. C. Eligible Economic Development Activity Neighborhood based non - profit organizations, small business investment companies, or local development corporations are eligible for Block Grant funds to implement certain economic development and commercial revitalization activities. The financial assistance can be in the form of grants, loans, loan guarantees, or technical assistance to existing small businesses, minority businesses, neighborhood non - profit business. The above groups can use the Block Grant funds for the following purposes: Working capital, operational funds, land purchase, purchase of equipment and fixtures, energy construction improvements, acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, or installation of cormercial • and industrial buildings. However, all economic development activities must reet the following criteria: 1) Combine private and public invest- ments toward alleviating physical deterioration or economic distress in a community; 2) Benefit lower income and handicapped persons by providir-, jobs; 3) and fit into an overall economic development strategy. D. Planning and Administration Expenses CDBG funds are authorized for the following activities: 1. Preparing comprehensive community development plans; 2. Preparing community -wide plans for land use historical preservation, economic development, and neighborhood preservation; 3. Administrative cost relating to the planning and implementation of community development activities. Tool inible Activities The foll,;wing types of activities are generally ineligible: 1. Stadiums, convention canters, concert halls, city halls, regional headquarters for public safety agencies (building, and facilities fnr the general conduct of government). ... Tiro stations and eqv pment in target areas where no other CDBG activity is occurinri in the same orogram year. 3. Facilities for exclusive use by one group or organization. • 4. Maintenance and operation expenses, including deferred maintenance. 5. New housing construction. 6. Public service except in a neighborhood stragegy area (NSA). 7. Hospitals, nursing homes and other medical facilities. 8. Airports, subways, trolly lines, bus or other transit terminals. 9. Purchase of movable equipment or construction equipment. • • r. 7 , 2 �C) u WHEN: i • to discuss the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM for the next program year April 6, 1963 a W14ERE: Lions Park Community Center Forum © TIME: 7:00 PM © For more information contact: Community Development Department: 989 -1851 ,1a` Para discutir el prosupuesto -del programa ;CMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT Para el ano entrante Qa I'ECI=IA: Abrii f, 1983 ® LUGAR: Centro Lions Park a I=I ®RA: 7:00 PM ® Si desea mas informacion comunicarse con el: Departamento del desarrallo de la Ciudad: 989 -1851 • RESOLUTION NO. * 8 3Jy:�' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the regulations governing the Community Development Block Grant Program; and 'AHEREAS, the City's Planning Division Staff has conducted a needs assessment and held discussions with local organizations to determine City Block Grant Program needs; and AMEREAS, the City released a Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives indicating staff recommendations for Block Grant Program funding for the next program year; and ''WHEREAS, the City Council has held a legally noticed public hearing in order to give the public an opportunity to respond to staff recommendations for program funding and to put forth for Council consideration recommendations of their own; and WHEREAS, the City Council has heard public testimony and received all public input regarding the City's Community Development Block Grant Program • for the next program year. NOw, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby authorize the funding of the following programs and supporting costs to be funded out of the City's Community Development Block Grant award: �3 � COMMUNITY OtVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM: Proposed Budget 1983 -84 Budget Year Pro rain Amount % of Total 1) Neighborhood Center Expansion $297,000 68 *2) Housing Rehabilitation Loan/ 70,000 16 Senior Citizen Repair Grant program 3) Local Coats - Program Implementation (a) Administration $ 5,000 (b) Program Management $ 55,000 (c) Fair Housing Services $ 5,000 (d) Contingency $ 5,000 $ 70,000 16 `OT1L $437,000 100 �3 � 0 .I L w nrmv nn n n w11.n nr Tn ♦ nenwrn . STAFF REPORT �v , F' I: DATE: April 6, 1983 — 1977 TO: Members of the of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank J. Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83 -0 --An amendment to Chapter 1, Section 1.08.160 and X170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding Home Occupation Permits. SUMMARY: In an attempt to streamline and simplify the Home Occupation Permit (HOP) procedure, staff has prepared a Zoning Ordinance amendment which amends some of the HOP criteria to bring them into conformance with other sections of the Zoning Code and eliminates the posting and notification requirements. This amendment will create a more expedient and cost efficient process. Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission staff report which more fully describes the Zoning Ordinance amendment. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of February 23, 1983, conducted a public hearing and recommended approval of the amendment through adoption of the attached Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attacneu Zoning Ordinance amendment and the issuance of a Negative Declaration, Respectfully Submitted, Rick mez (City fanner RG:FO:jr I Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Resolution of Approval February 23, 1983 Planning Commission Minutes City Council Ordinance P) 0 • is ® IRTV AV RANOUn CI TCAI NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 23, 1983 F � 1975 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83 -01 - An amendment to Chapter 1, Section 1.08.160 and 1.08.170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding Home Occupation Permits. SUi1?'ARY: In an attempt to streamline and simplify the Home Occupation Permit (HOP) procedure, staff has prepared the attached amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which is designed to (1) redefine criteria for conformance with other sections of the Zoning Code; and, (2) eliminate the posting and notification requirements. ANALYSTS: Currently, the procedure for Home Occupation Permits requires the Community Development Director to review Home Occupation Permit applications within ten (10) days, and to render a decision regarding the proposed opperation. In addition, staff is required to post a Notice of Request for a Home Occupation Permit on the subject property and send a copy of the applicants request to all adjacent property owners. However, it has been staff's experience that current posting and notification procedures are more costly to the City in terms of manpower and expenditure than the benefits gained by notification. The following situations illustrate this point. 1. Currently, staff reviews between 30 and 50 applications for home occupations per month. The review procedure usually involves three staff members who collectively spend approximately 40 hours per month reviewing proposals and notifying adjacent property owners of a proposed home occupation. This procedure has proved to be very consumptive of staff time, in relation to responses gained through notification. Plus, there is no fee charged for an HOP. 2. Of qreater importance is the number of responses gained from adjacent property owners regarding proposed home occupations. Of the notices sent to adjacent property owners per month, on the averane only three (3) responses are generated. This equates, at best, to a 6 percent response to all notices processed each month. J ?A ITEM G Zoning Ordinance Amldment 83 -01 Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 2 • 3. The notification procedure was originally designed to receive public input on potential problem areas. However, this has not been the case. The responses received are generally questions about the use and what measures are available in the event a problem or nuisance arises. As always, Home Occupation Permit violations will be enforced on a complaint basis. This requires staff to investigate complaints and, if found in violation, to revoke the permit or attach additional conditions designed to mitigate the problem or nuisance. In addition, prior to the issuance of a permit, home occupations of a controversial nature will be investigated in greater detail. Therefore, all current notification requirements will be eliminated. The City Planner or his designated representative will make a final determination as to whether or not an applicant's home occupation conforms to the conditions set forth in this ordinance. Also, minor changes have been made to various conditions of approval which allow for greater Home Occupation Permit flexibility. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed an Initial Study on this amendment to determine whether or not this amendment could cause signficant adverse environmental impacts and have found that such . amendment would not cause significant environmental impacts. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in The Daily Report newspaper. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this proposal. RECDImENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all aspects of this change. If the Commission concurs with the proposed amendment, adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval of the amendment to the City Council would be appropriate. Resllectfp lly,�ubmitted, Rick come z^>� City Planner 1 gG:FD:jr Attachments: Proposed City Council Ordinance Planning Commission Resolution • d 3� 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, .RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 83 -01, ADDING SECTIONS 61.024A(b)(3) AND 61.024D(b)(3), AND AMENDING SECTION 61.0219(x)(9) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing to consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 83 -01; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission feels that such amendment will not jeopardize the health, safety and welfare of the public; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found it necessary to simplify the Home Occupation permit procedure in order to expedite permit approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found it necessary to re- define various conditions of approval related to Home Occupation permits. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will —not create a significant adverse impact on the environment • and has reccmmended issuance of a Negative Declaration on February 23, 1983. NO'.J, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 64854 to 65847 of the California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 23rd day of February, 1982, of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 82 -03. 2. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 82 -03 as shown on the attached Ordinance. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1983. PLANNIIIr, CO'I'lISSION OF T E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: �i✓ut!/M �"� Jee rey KinUp, Chvirmanf AT.t ST� Secretary or the Planning Commisslen �11 Resolution No. • Page 2 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of February, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, REMPEL, BARKER, MCNIEL, KING NONE NONE �Ll0 • • • G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83-01 - An amendment to Chapter 1, Section 1.08.160 and 1.08.170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding home occupation permits. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Stout asked what type of home occupations are being applied for? Mr. Vairin replied that in these hard economic times people are applying for a wide variety of s'_de -line businesses. Jack Lam, Community Development Director, explained that even though there is no fee for a home occupation permit, it is a record xeeping system in which if • there is a problem, the City has the ability to provide more effective enforcement. Commissioner Stout asked if a cost study had been done on these permits. Mr. Vairin replied that it had been done at one time and it was around $20 to $25, which included mailing notification. With the implementation of the proposed ordinance, the amount would be very nominal since it would be a permit issued at the counter. Mr. Lam stated that the problem in adding a fee for the permit is that a lot of the people now applying for the permits would not have done so if there was a fee involved. Ted Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, advised that this might also dissuade people from taking out a city business license. Commissioner Stout stated that it seemed that conditions 4 and 5 conflict because it states that you can grow ,fruit on your own trees and sell it, but no one can come to your, house and buy it. Mr. Vairin rip lie? that this was not the intent and would not be interpreted :n that :.inn ,.r. 9 Piunn;n, ;omir:;:;icn ,'Minutes -7- February 23, 1993 I � L // Dar. Coleman stated that you could add a statement in condition 5 of the • ordinance to include the sale of fruits or vegetables that would eliminate the conflict. Commissioner Stout stated that he felt this inclusion would be a good idea. Chairman Ring opened the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, unanimously carried to adopt Resolution 83 -22 recommending approval Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -01 to the City Council with the change to condition 5 of the proposed City Council Ordinance to include the sale of fruits and vegetables. AYES: CC..MISSIONERS: Barker, Stout, Mc Niel, Rempel, King NOES: CCJMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: CO'CIISSIONERS: None -carried- * # * M I 1 L J • '% 4%- • ORDINANCE NO. * ' q I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 1.08.160 and 1.08.170 OF THE CITY, OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 1.08.160 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section .02 A -b7(3) of the San Bernardino County Code is added to read as follows: Section 61.024A(b)(3) Home occupations pursuant to Section 61.0219(a)(9). _ SECTION 2: Section 1.08.160 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 6 .0 4D b (3) of the San Bernardino County Code is added to read as follows: Section 61.024D(b)(3) Home Occupations pursuant to Section 61.0219(a)(9). • SECTION 3: Section 1.08.170 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 6170-2795T(9) of the San Bernardino County Code is amended to read as follows: Section 61.0219(a)(9) - HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS A. Home Occupations, as defined in Section 61.022, may be permitted on any property used for residential purposes upon approval of the City Planner based on the following conditions: 1. The use of the dwelling for such home occupation shall be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its inhabitants. 2. No persons , other than members of the family who reside on the premises, shall be engaged in such activity. 3. There shall be no change in the outward appearance of the building or premises, or visible evidence of the activity. 4. There shall be no sales of products on the premises, except produce (fruit or vegetables) grown on the subject property. ll1J Ordinance No. Page 2 r1 LJ 5. The use shall not allow customers or clientele to visit - dwellings. However, incidental uses such as music lessons, and the sale of fruits and vegetables may he permitted if the intensity of such instruction is approved by the City Planner. 6. No equipment or processes shall be used on the subject property which creates noise, smoke, glare, fumes, odor, vibration, electrical, radio or television interference disruptive to surrounding properties. 7. No home occupation shall be conducted in an accessory building. Normal use of the garage may be permitted if such use does not obstruct required parking. 8. Not more than 15% of the total square footage of the dwelling or one room of the dwelling, whichever is less, shall be used for the home occupation. • 9. The use shall not involve storage of materials or supplies in an accessory building or outside any structures. 10. Use of the United States Postal Service in conjunction with the home occupation shall be done by means of a post office box. 11. No signs shall be displayed in conjunction with the home occupation and there shall be no advertising using the home address. 12. A home occupation permit is not valid until a current City business license is obtained. 13. The use shall not involve the use of commercial vehicles for delivery of materials to or from the premises, other than a vehicle not to exceed a capacity of 1 112 ton, owned by the operator of such home occupation. 14. If an applicant is not the owner of the property where a home e,rupation is to be conducted, then a signed statement from the owner approving such use of the dwelling must be submitted with the . application. 3 aqq • Ordinance No. Page 3 B. Procedure for Approval: Upon acceptance of a home occupation application, the City Planner or his designated representative shall review the request for compliance with the above conditions. Following a 5 day review period, the City Planner shall render a decision. The decision shall clearly state, in writing, any conditions of approval or reasons for denial based upon the above findings. The decision of the City Planner shall be final unless appealed to the Planning Commission within fourteen (14) days from his decision. Upon receiving approval from the City Planner or his designate for a home occupation, the applicant shall immediately make application for a City Business License. City Business Licenses expire on a yearly basis. If the business license is not renewed within thirty (30) days after expiration, then the home occupation permit shall become null and void. C. Appeal Procedure: • The decision of the City Planner may be appealed within fourteen (14) calendar days to the Planning Commission by the applicant or any other aggrieved person as prescribed in Section 61.0222 of the San Bernardino County Code. SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, nereoy finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment and issues a Negative Declaration for this Amendment. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause— a same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation publis'nad in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ays 7 • 7 MEMORANDUM' i77 f � DATE: March 1, 1983 TO: City Council FROM: Harry Empey - Finance DirecteSt, SUBJECT: Bed Tax and Admissions Tax Bed Tax and Admissions Tax are two of the few remaining mechanisms open to cities to raise revenue and maintain local control. These particular taxes are not large revenue sources, however, they have the potential to be a significant factor in the General Fund in the future, One item that needs clarification us that these taxes are not special taxes. These types of taxes are deposited in the General Fund for general use, therefore, an election is not required. These types of taxes are identified with growth. This is, of course, as it should be. As the community grows, so will these types of taxes. As the community grows so does the natural demand for services. The Farrell case has opened the door heretofore closed to general law cities. What once was the exclusive right of charter cities is now the domain of general law cities as well. Therefore, while the opportunity exists, it is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinances for Bed Tax and Admis- sions Tax. IIJE /wa a2=! (- - CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM February 9, 1983 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager SUBJECT: Bed Tax and Admissions Tax F C: On the next City Council agenda for consideration March 16, the council will have two ordinances; one proposing a bed tax for motels and the other an admissions tax for theaters and similar recreational activities. It is important, in our view, to have these two taxes on the books before we have major hotels or other entertainment activities in the city. At the present time the bed tax would affect the New Kansan Motel and Club 66. However, we all are well aware of the city's potential for having a large hotel similar to the Red Lion at some poiint in the near future. The same rationale is true of the admissions tax. The only retail establish- ment impacted by the proposed 53 admissions tax is the roller rink. The real purpose of the tax is, again, to deal with future activities. We are certain that down the road the city will have an entertainment center with numerous theaters. There is substantial revenue to be gained from the admissions tax. Incidentally, the admissions tax is a tax that the city previously has been unable to implement. However, due to recent court decisions general law cities now have the same authority as charter cities with respect to special taxes. Gentlemen, I think you are well aware of the city's financial problems. They probably will get worse before they get better. The admissions tax and the bed tax are two taxes which the city can implement with a minimum of resistance. We would like to discuss this issue with you prior to the meeting of the 16th. LMW: mk ay -7 • ORDINANCE NO. I/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 3.40 THERETO TO IMPOSE A TAX UPON THE PRIVI- LEGE OF TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 3.40 thereto to read as follows: Sections: 3. 40.010 3. 40.020 3. 40.030 • 3. 40.040 3. 40.050 3. 40.060 3. 40.070 3.40.080 3. 40.090 3.40.100 3. 40.110 3.40.120 3.40.130 3. 40.140 Chapter 3.40 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX Definitions. Imposition, Generally. Allowance for Collection Costs. Collection by Operators. Registration of Hotel Operators; Issuance and Contents of Registration Certificate. Filing of Report and Remittance of Tar. Collector. Penalties for Delinquent Payment. Determination of Tax by Director of Finance Upon Failure of Operator to Collect and Report. Appeals. Records to be Kept for Three Years. Enforcement. Disbursement. Violations. Effective Date. 3.40.010 Definitions. Except where the context otherwise requires, the definitions given in this section govern the con- struction of this chapter: A. Person. "Person" means any individual, firm, partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, joint stock, company, corporation, estate, trust, business trust, receiver., trustee, syndicate, or any other group or combination acting as a unit. 13. Hotel. "Hotel." means any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for occupancy by transients for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes, and includes any hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodging house, rooming house, apartment house, dor- mitory, public or private club, mobile home or house trailer at a fixed location, or other similar structure or portion thereof. C. Occupancy. "Occupancy" means the use or possession or • the right to the use or possession of any room or rooms or portion thereof, in any hotel for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes_. D. Transient. "Transient" means any person who exercises occupancy or is entitled to occupancy by reason of concession, per- mit, right of access, license or other agreement for a period of thirty (30) consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days. Any such person so occupying space in a hotel shall be deemed to be a transient until the period of thirty (30) days has expired, unless there is an agreement in writ- ing between the operator and the occupant providing for a longer period of occupancy. In determining whether a person is a trans- ient, uninterrupted periods of time extending both prior and sub- sequent to the effective date of this chapter may be considered. E. Rent. "Rent" means the consideration charged, whether or not received, for the occupancy of space in a hotel valued in money, whether to be received in money, goods, labor or otherwise, includ- ing all receipts, cash, credits and property and services of any kind or nature, without any deduction therefrom whatsoever. F. Operator. "Operator" means a person who is proprietor of the hotel, whether in the capacity of owner, lessee, sublessee, mortgagee in possession, licensee or any other capacity. Where the operator performs his functions through a managing agent of any type or character other than an employee, the managing agent shall also be deemed an operator for the purposes of this chapter and shall have the same duties and liabilities as his principal. Com- pliance with the provisions of this chapter by either the principal or the managing agent shall, however, be considered to be compliance by both. 3.40.020 Imposition, Generally. For the privilege of occu- pancy in any hotel, each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of ten (10) percent of the rent charged by the operator. Said tax constitutes a debt owed by the transient to the City which is extinguished only by payment to the operator or to the City. The transient shall pay the tax to the operator of the hotel at the time the rent is paid. If the rent is paid in install- ments, a proportionate share of the tax shall be paid with each installment. The unpaid tax shall be due upon transient's ceasing to occupy space in the hotel. If for any reason the tax due is not paid to the operator of the hotel, the Director of Finance may require that such tax shall be paid directly to the Director of Finance. 3.40.030 Allowance for Collection Costs. From the full amount of the tax collected and transmitted to the Director of Finance pursuant to this chapter, each operator may deduct and retain as for his administrative expense in the collection of said tax, an amount equal to four (4) percent of the total tax to be paid. 3.40.040 Collection by Operators. Each operator shall collect • the tT. Epoed by this chpo.ter to toe same extent and at the same time as the rent is collected from every transient. The amount of tax shall be separately stated from the amount of the rent charged, and each transient shall receive a receipt for payment from the operator. No operator of a hotel shall advertise or state in any manner., whether directly or indirectly, that the tax or any part thereof will be assumed or absorbed by the operator, or that it will not be added to the rent, or that, if added, any part will be refunded except in the manner hereinafter provided. 3.40.050 Registration of Hotel Operators; Issuance and Conte effective date of this chapter, or within thirty (30) days after commencing business, which ever is later, each operator of any hotel renting occupancy to transients shall register said hotel with the Director of Finance and obtain from him a "Transient Occupancy Registration Certificate" to be at all times posted in a conspicu- ous place on the premises. Said certificate shall, among other things, state the following: A. The name of the operator; B. The address of the hotel; C. The day upon which the certificate was issued; D. "'This Transient Occupancy Registration Certificate signi- fies that the person named on the face hereof has fulfilled the requirements of the uniform transient occupancy tax ordinance by registering with the Director of Finance for the purpose of collect- ing from transients the transient occupancy tax and remitting said tax to the Director of Finance. This certificate does not authorize . any person to conduct any unlawful business or to conduct any law- ful business in an unlawful manner, nor to operate a hotel without strictly complying with all local applicable laws, including but not limited to those requiring a permit from any board, commission, department or office of this City. This certificate does not con- stitute a permit. ". 3.40.060 Piling of Report and Remittance of Tax Collected. Each operator shall, on or before the last day of the month follow- ing the close of each calendar quarter, or at the close of any shorter reporting period which may be established by the Director of Finance, make a return to the Director of Finance, on forms provided by him "her, of the total rents charged and received and the amount of tax collected from transient occupancies. At the time the return is filed, the full amount of the tax collected shall be remitted to the Director of Finance. The Director of Finance may establish shorter reporting periods for any certif.i- cato holaer if he deems it necessary in order to insure collection of the tax and he may require further information in the return. Returns and payments are due immediately upon cessation of business for any reason. All taxes collected by opera %ors pursuant to this chapter shall be held in trust for the account of the City until payment thereof is made to the Director of Finance. 3.40.070 Penalties for Delinduent Payment. A. Original delinquency. Any operator who fails to remit any tax imposed by this chapter within the time required shall pay a penalty of ten (10) percent of the amount of the tax in addition to the amount of the ta::. rjr �C�d B. Continued delinquency. Any operator who fails to remit any delinquent remittance on or before a period of thirty (30) days • following the date on which the remittance first became delinquent shall pay a second delinquency penalty of ten (10) percent of the amount of the tax, in addition to the amount of the tax and the ten (10) percent penalty first imposed. C. Fraud. If the-Director of Finance determines that the non - payment of any remittance due under this chapter is due to fraud, a penalty of twenty -five (25) percent of the amount of the tax shall be added thereto, in addition to the penalties stated in Subpara- graphs (A) and (B) of this Section. D. Interest. In addition to the penalties imposed, any opera- tor who fails to remit any tax imposed by this chapter shall pay interest at the rate of one (1) percent per month, or fraction thereof, on the amount of the tax, exclusive of penalties from the date on which the remittance first became delinquent until paid. E. Penalties Merged with Tax. Every penalty imposed and such interest as accrues under the provisions of this Section shall become a part of the tax herein required to be paid. 3.40.080. Determination of Tax by Director of Finance Failure Of DDeYater to Cellcct And Rennrf_ Tf Anv nnoraf nr tail or retuse to collect said tax and to make, within the time provided in this chapter, any report and remittance of said tax or portion thereof required by this chapter, the Director of Finance shall proceed in such manner as he may deem best to obtain facts and information on which to base his estimate of the tax due. As soon as the Director of Finance shall procure such facts and infor- • mation as he is able to obtain upon which to base the assessment of any tax imposed by this chapter and payable by any operator who has failed or refused to collect the same and to make such report and remittance, he shall proceed to determine and assess against such operator the tax, interest and penalties provided for by this chap- ter. In case such determination is made, the Director of Finance shall give a notice of the amount so assessed by serving it person - ally or by depositing it in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the operator so assessed, at his last known place of address. Such operator may within ten (10) days after the serving or mailing of such notice make application in writing to the Director of Finance for a hearing on the amount assessed. If application by the operator for a hearing is not made within the time prescribed, the tax, interest and penalties, if any, determined by the Director of Finance shall become final, and conclusive and immediately due and payable. If such application is made, the Director of Finance shall give not less than five (5) days written notice in the manner prescribed herein to the operator to show cause at a time and place fixed in said notice why said amount specified therein should not be fixed for such tax, interest and penalties. At such hearing, the operator may appear and offer evidence why such specified tax, interest and penalties should not be so fixed. After such hearing the Director of Finance shall determine the proper tax to be remit- ted and shall thereafter give written notice to the person in the manner prescribed herein of such determination and the amount of . such tax, interest and penalties. The amount determined to be due shall be payable after fifteen (15) days unless an appeal is taken u� S � as provided in Section 3.40.090. • 3.40.090 Appeals. Any operator aggrieved by any decision of the Director o: Finance with respect to the amount of such tax, -. interest and penalties, if any, may appeal to the City Council by filing notice of appeal with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) days of the serving or mailing of the determination of tax due. The Council shall fix a time and place for hearing such appeal, and the City Clerk shall give notice in writing to such operator at his last known place of address. The findings of the Council shall be final and conclusive, and shall be served upon the appel- lant in the manner prescribed above for service of notice of hear- ing. Any amount found to be due shall be immediately due and pay- able upon the service of notice. 3. 40.100 Records to be Kept for Three Years. It shall be the duty of every operator liable for the collection and payment to the City of any tax imposed by this chapter to keep and preserve, for a period of three (3) years, all records as may be necessary to determine the amount of such tax as he may have been liable for the collection of and payment to the City, which records the Director of Finance shall have right to inspect at all reasonable times. 3.40.110 Enforcement. Any tax required to be paid by any transient under the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed a debt owed by the transient to the City. Any such tax collected by • an operator which has not been paid to the City shall be deemed a debt owed by the operator to the City. Any person owing money to the City under the provisions of this chapter shall be liable to an action brought in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the recovery of such amount. 3.40.120 Disbursement. All monies received by the City from the collection of transient occupancy tax shall be paid into the General Fund. 3.40.1.30 Violations. Any person violating any provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punish- able therefor by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) , or by .imprisonment in the County jail for a period of not more than six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprison- ment. Any operator or other person who fails or refuses to regis- ter as rcquired herein or to furnish any return required to be made, or who fails or refuses to furnish a supplemental return or other data required by the Director of Finance, or who renders a false or fraudulent return or claim is guilty of a misdemeanor, and and is punishable as aforesaid. Any person required to make, render, submit or verify any report or claim who makes any false or fraudu- lent report or claim with intent to defeat or evade the determination of any amount due required by this chapter to be made, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and is punishable as aforesaid. 3.40.140 Effective Date. This chapter shall take effect in thirty (JO) _ days after adoption, except that the tax imposed by this c!•.nptor shall become operative on July 1, 1963. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence • clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional, then all other provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circula- tion, published in—the-City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1983. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: +�3VR • CITY CLERK • • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNI- CIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 3.36 THERETO TO IMPOSE AN ADMISSIONS TAX. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION ]: Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 3.36 thereto to read as follows: Sections: 3. 36.010 3.36.020 3. 36.030 • 3. 36.040 2 3.366.0550 3. 36.060 3.36.070 3. 36.080 3.36.090 3. 36.100 3. 36.110 3. 36.120 3. 36.130 3. 36.140 3.36.150 Chapter 3.36 ADMISSIONS TAX Definitions. Imposition of Tax. Season Pass. Collection and Payment. Accounting and Payment to the City. Form of Return for Accounting. Alternate Procedure. Failure to File Accountings or to Pay Over Tax. Interest. Willful Failure to Account or to Pay Over Tax. Joint and Several Liability of Operator and Person Collecting Tax. Maintenance of Action. Payment by Operator in Lieu of Collecting Tax. Exemptions. Use of Proceeds. 3.36.010 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, cer- tain words and phrases used in this chapter shall be construed as set forth in this section unless it is apparent from the entire context that a different meaning is intended. A. ADMISSION: "admission" includes every act of entry by a person or patron to any portion of any premises. B. ATTEND: "attend" includes the terms; see, view, witness, enjoy, watch, be present at, and participate in. C. ADMISSION PRICE: "admission price" includes money, and in addition to or in lieu of money, any valuable consideration paid, given or received in exchange for the right or privilege of admit- tance to any premises or attending any event, and any additional ' consideration paid, given or received after admission to any premises in exchange for the right or privilege of admission to or use of any 'J .25'/ portion of such premises or any accomodations or facilities therein located or provided. • D. CONDUCT: "conduct" includes operate, carry -on, maintain, keep, render, perform, hold, give, put -on and exhibit. E. EVENT: "event" includes every moving picture performance, exhibition, fair, meeting, performance, race, dance, demonstration., or attraction at which live participation by human beings or ani- mals is involved, for which a separate or additional admission price is paid for the right or privilege of attending or being admitted to the same. "Event" also includes the right or privilege of park- ing a motor vehicle for which a separate or additional admission price is paid for such right or privilege. F. OPERATOR: "operator" includes any person, association, firm, or corporation owning, operating, conducting, directing, managing, or controlling, alone or in conjunction with or indepen- dent contractor, any event or portion of which is subject to any tax imposed by any provision of this chapter. 3. PATROL;: "patron" includes any person who pays or, on account of when is paid, any admission price for the right or priv- ileges of being admitted to any premises for the purpose of attend- ing any event. H. PREMISES: "premises" includes any property, building, structure, enclosure, location or place, whether improved or not, and whether or not the same be owned by any individual person, firm association, group, or corporation upon which any event is con- ducted or at or from which any event may be attended. I. SEASON PASS: "season pass" means and includes every season • ticket, season pass, passbook, club membership, membership card, association membership or insignia, or other device (other than a service pass), the ownership or possession of which entitles the owner or holder thereof to admission more than one time to any premise. 3.36.020 Imposition of Tax. There is hereby imposed a tax upon every patron who pays an admission price for admission to or for the privilege to attend, any event at any premises in the City. Said tax shall be at the rate of 10 percent (10 %) of the admission price. 3.36.030 Season Pass. If admission or attendance is under or by virtue of a season pass for which any admission price has been paid, the tax due thereon shall be paid and collected at the time place that such season pass is purchased. 3.36.040 Collection and Pavment. The tax imposed by Section 3.36.020 shall be paid at the time when and the place at which the admission price is paid. Said tax shall be collected by the person charging for such admission. 3.3r ,050 Accounting and Payment to the Cit On or before the 10th uay o� cacti month, any person required to collect the tax im- posed by Section 3.36.020 shall render (in duplicate) an accounting to the City of all such taxable admissions during the month preced- ing such accounting. Such accounting shall be filed with the Finance ��s Director at the office of said director in the City Hall, and at • the time of such filing the person collecting such tax shall then and there pay to the Finance Director all amounts so collected as taxes under this chapter, as shown in such accounting. The correctness of such accounting shall be subject to audit by the Finance Director or his authorized representatives, who are hereby authorized and empowered to inspect and audit the books and records of any and all persons subject to the provisions of this chapter. 3.36.060 Form of Return for Accounting. A. The forms of return to be executed and filed pursuant to the requirements of this chapter shall be such as may be prescribed by or acceptable to the Finance Director. B. Such returns shall be dated, subscribed by the individual making the statement stating the capacity in which the signer makes the same, and the signer shall certify under the penalty of perjury that the statements made therein are, to the best of his or her information, knowledge and belief, true and correct. 3.36.070 Alternate Procedure. Upon good cause shown, the Citv Council may, in its discretion, authorize a person required to collect the tax imposed by this chapter to file accountings, or pay over to the City taxes collected, or both, at a time or times or in a manner other than those specified in Section 3.36.050. 3.36.080 Failure to File Accountings or to Pay Over Tax. In • case of failure; A. to file any accounting required by this chapter, on the date prescribed therefor, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, there shall be added to the amount required to be shown as tax on such account- ing ten percent (10%) of the amount of such tax if the failure is for not more than one month, with an additional five percent (5?) for each additional month or fraction thereof during which such failure continues, not exceeding fifty percent (503) in the aggre- gate; B. to pay the amount shown as tax on any accounting specified in subsection A of this section on or before the date prescribed for payment of such tax, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, there shall be added to the amount shown as tax on such accounting one percent (la) of the amount of such tax if the failure is for not more than one month, with an additional one percent (18) for each additional month or fraction thereof during which such failure continues, not exceeding fifty percent (.505) in the aggregate. 3.36.0 ^0 Interest. If any amount of tax imposed by Section 3.36.00 is not paid on or before the last date prescribed for pay- ment, interest on such amount at an annual rate of twelve percent (127,) shall. be paid for the period from the date prescribed for ® ®® payment to the date paid. ++9k 3.36_10.0^ :willful Failure to Account or to Pay Over Tax. Any +� person r, r.�,:��. .? nnri�r this 'homer to collect, acco'Int for, and pay over any tax imposed by Section 3.36.020 who willfullv fails to collect or truthfully account for and pay over such tax shall, . in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $500.00, or imprison in the county jail not more than six months, or both. 3.36.110 Joint and Several Liahility of Operator and Person Collectrnq Pax. Any person required to collect the tax imposed by Section 373'1 020 and the operator of an event are jointly and severally liable to the City for the taxes required to be collected for such event, together with interest and penalties thereon. 3_36.120 Maintenance of Action. The City may maintain an action in any court of competent jurisdiction to recover the amount of taxes reauired to be collected under the provisions of this chapter and for interest and penalties thereon, and in addition thereto the City may, if it is the prevailing party, may recover reasonable attorneys fees and its other costs of suit. 3.36.130 Payment by Operator in Lieu of Collectin Tax. The operator of an event, in lieu of collecting the tax imposed by this chapter from patrons of the event, may elect to pay the City an amount equal to ten percent (10 %) of the total admission price for such event. 3.36.140 Exemptions. This chapter shall not apply to: • A. An event which is conducted or sponsored by corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and opera- ted exclusively for religious, charitable, or educational purposes, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, and the net earnings of which are devoted exclusively to religious, charitable or educational purposes. E. An event conducted or sponsored for fund raising purposes by any political party recognized by the State, by any candidate for political office, or by any committee on behalf of such pol- itical party or candidate providing that the net proceeds from conducting such event are devoted solely to the benefit of such political party or for the election of such candidate. C. To the right or privilege to park a motor vehicle where a charge is made through the use of a meter device and when such parking is upon a City Street or City owned parking lot. D. To an event which is conducted or sponsored by federal, state or local governmental entity. 3.36.110 Use of Proceeds. All taxes collected under the authority of this chapter shall be paid into the general fund of the City. SCCTI')N 2: The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that • any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases - :K7 or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional, then • all other provisions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in the The Daily Report, a newspaper of general cir- culation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circu- lated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1983. AXES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: • City Clerk rg 0 • s nlmv nc. o AlinUn nr rn A➢ n\Tn STAFF REPORT` °I! March 16, 1983 1977 TO: City Manager and Members of City Council FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager RE: Amendments to Ordinance 787 Creating an Advisory Commission to Act in an Advisory Capacity to the City Council and Planning Commission At its regular meeting of December 30, 1982, the Advisory Commission acted upon the City Council's recommendation to help formalize the structure of the Advisory Commission by appointing a chairman. The chairman would serve for one year and preside at Advisory Commission meetings. The City Council directed that the creation of a chairman be mandated by ordinance which necessitates a revision in the existing ordinance. In addition, the City Council directed staff to prepare language that would provide two year terms of office for new Advisory Commission members. These two recommended changes are incorporated into the attached revised ordinance. RECON MoATION: Staff would recommend adoption of the attached revised ordinance to incorporate these modifications. JR:mk Attachment i � cr C.A,C• Arew.ke /rv< �' 4. Placement of trees would be approximately 25 -40 feet from structures. • 5. Replacement of trees would not necessarily be in the same location of previous trees. A motion was made by Sharon Romero, seconded by Joe White and unanimously carried to support the proposed policy of eucalyptus windrows within the Etiwands Specific Plan. Glenn Nankin arrived at 7:35 p.m. and took his place at the commission table. 4B. APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY COMMISSION CHAIRMAN Discussion included: 1. Chairman of one community would be ineligible to be chairman the next year. 2. Chairman to rotate annually between the three communities with advice and consent of the commission 3. Formalize rotation in a CAC resolution, to be amended at a later date if necessary. 4. Chairman may act as CAC spokesperson to the Planning Commission and City Council. S. One year appointment to be made by CAC. A motion was made by Jim Banks, seconded by Don Baer, to adopt CAC rule by • C resolution that annual chairman shall not come from the same community two years in succession. Motion carried. Livia Valiance abstaining. A motion was made by Jim Banks, seconded by Joe White to adopt a resolution requesting City Council draft an ordinance stating the chairman of CAC shall hold office for a one year period with possible removal by same process. Motion carried. A recess was called at 7:55 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 8:02 p.m. A motion was made by Jim Banks, seconded by Joe White to nominate Sharon Romero for chairman. A motion was made by Jim Banks, seconded by Joe White, and carried unanimously to close the nominations and appoint Sharon Romero as chairman, effective January 27, 1983 for the calendar year. 5. NEIV BUSINESS. Sharon Romero inquired as to the progress of the proposed civic center. Jim Robinson replied there had been a groundbreaking ceremony for the county Foothill Law and Justice Centcr. The city recently made the second and final payment and now owns the land. The City Council is now studying the potential methods available to finance the civic center. .Joe While requested the commission direct staff look into a possible anti - business • position of the city. Also that Jeff Sceranka, Chamber of Commerce Director, be invited to the CAC meeting in February to respond to this concern. • P.,.. c... .. _, To, 19 ?• ill. .: "';5 ;;': :: \>1'•: d' tTh \::: 'ti Tp i•!;L;:::d:CC CO. i]. !:STArd.l. ",1 i:::: TIN: du\']in:;Y SLrt \tr mum m till super t, coo . -. ague[ 71 a teL ,s tan. fill les tl concurs. its, urea inson el"cd the Advisory Co .i +sal tun listed m .,t. . � ens as icltows: � To loIllits III. structure of tllc Advil o:y Cu: vhi 11 n to t appoint a rho IIOCrson from l of the c mitius s short you la b sibilit• w thin each c nits for an individual to twee clureoaI'd orllarize that portion of the Advisory Cor.,niesion. Perhaps also a chair- person be appointed for the entire commission. _. installs 8e c v - ration between the Advisory Commission ..,,be,, a with the rest of tire co.-conatty. Members should be olumeraged to participate outside of the Advisomv Commission meetings by possibly attending Council meetings, Planning Commission meetings, and being involved In other activities in order Is became more knowledgeable toimprove their input to the Advisory Commission. d, felt it essential that city council appoint a delegate to the Advisor:: Com.ission to attend their meetings and t. It as It liaison bee:een tEe city council and the advisory Imagistic.. d. Commission also discussed ways In which to get note conmpnity involvement with the Advisory Commission. 5. Thew encouraged chamber of commerce exposure. 6. Encouraged that the scope of the activities be broadened. • the Advisory Commission appoint a delegate t r ). Felt itimportoant that city co v crl r, eoi e world be at council meetings and to e , I the flown of c uni,ation. 8. Perhaps establish a more formal attendance policy. 9. Change routine, schedule, perhaps meet every ocher month or even quarterly so 14a1 agendas could be more concentrated. 10. Perhaps expansion of the role of the Advisory Commission. 11. Lunge In term of office; perhaps four year tern is too long. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments. There being none, the meeting was closed for further public comments. Council -an Schlosser stated be would like to trip the fulvivory Commission, but the question vas how do we keep them bete. thing he would like to add would be to pave a critique made by the Advisory Commission of the Council. He felt the changes tenet rep •ndml - r x cis ant and spmlid b (e orroramed. Councils nl Lat agreed that rho scope of their ,e nvf t.v: could be broadened, expesnre to the c. -- mil. and dumber, ctc. ware trop oremt. Ile s,atrd that it seemed that ❑arc . . a braa'xdova in c municntions between the courell and plamling comnisslon. Too Owl. rruv mind, a ore taken lightly. Ile felt it ..old be interesting M1`ften I w the othe n ottice 11,,d at that.• ::[ivanda Spec. It, Plan. He ems Ills lthe oppm ed to Iht empo of Adviaor; eemmisslun to ,cram, it with the Parks L+lln and frail: co,mios Lm felt the Parks; Commission was a high I, technical commission .1111. the All[ ary Cl lL.to, v a general or,anizl,ica m give a more 8andrn1 o. munl ti input while this P,.1,tI Ind Trolls CormLaslun would be more focused. 'lava Iakek; asked if 1pa Mutant, Commission had ar x, to the Clty Council Agendas? ❑r. Rea,, on -.tatrd that it v l mot lcA agLL en of the agendas. layer Mikels sorted that I lad access to all (tame III !I v 1 ro to to I(11.0 mud by Council then and Oab i nr.ato dincn::slen I their own If L!' sired. Mr. nonagon stated that t'o CLC .u,. Ll desire Is C, aava e1 increaaad mceber of iL me forwarded to them s n. ell t/ 'I" .ous:Lleratlnnz. Mayer Mikels stated that regarding the formulization of the Cosmnieelon, they could 7 �f II f. l 1 i - 1-st ; ..,4 t 'm t 'I en .'rev t I k" - z i , .1 In .. rleii-tn'rd" i 'n yl i'd, Mr r J L lt.IrOlt 0. I T he disa.;rr a11 vitb chi.. lN' L rlt this n Ill t io staff, I oil 'cu - " , it - . net l'. w tar tip ref I tl.' 1-A , : h: . 1 li'4 pit 'll par[ a, , ". ,,I, " t ti'.� Cirri . . . . . . . -old ho, •'l it r -. ; 0. Caure it -,11 e4t ad 1h.1 I titla.411 efil" 'Ict'i R ""' 'it it haw ' I I be d i-cu!' 'r ' l't - that all 1.1lecillassele's ill he at . . via CAC nee'lie's. Me ill, 'hat -1 A suflic.ent. Mot to n: Meeled by Sc h la I It that a f1-1 f ]to Car. -tea ion l - P P41 k n 1 .. t I • -ten it I to 111th each city I .. or I I asr be I e. u.'s -a' le"ar. but •ll I.,- • a. al I of the failure it to lot lade this a a a fact r 4 a of the C!ca it I anon. I %"a i . I City Cann ell De t ,. b• 1. %dy 15.11 Cr. an 11,11, a: M,. Fro sr su gA, I : oil coca. i 1.,� as b 111 t L c ' I I -1i. that o- i el ol It le, cart of chat CAC meet Lng s. C.ar,til c.ct.r,cd. 4. Advilc-, Ca,i,.,Ioc 1. C—il : C..rsij ccc.rr,d it:; the marl-ation chattel commission's rate and act Curies be more publicitel in arder. to local citizen participation and create a general awareness of tare iri'c-earco of the Coav 1551. n. 5. Chamber of Commerce Excescre: Call concurred that the C:wv,,!b-r of C,-,erce loeq;J co encore m.re al'itIcarl, of Croclst".a se"'itt"s aid their rle in the community. 6. Ble.1611 i—no of CulilIzon Altililies: Council enritIrred that this it,-. ' -o� lip with ill be furlu-,i -.,Ik to the CAC 'Or L.nom to a list Of items t:lli� wanted to h.,c, tailed nee, co than. 7. a Gil_, Council tort.-i-tsi tic' the Chair-.,,, leal'i act is 01 colll,-It' and sloposina. 1. It'. City Council. Council als. discussed the f.11lil flint, listed an Mr. Robinson', volo dated July 30, 193.1 to the City Council and included in the agenda packet: A. Alt,-',in. ll Oraullsu,, of council ars that tranni would kit st rill. sm r eye on file attendance, but to cortillev present policy to is, Ile Corti police fecrentl'as. ". '. il-i. i ef X..", I : itc, c,l l,ul' n,rl,l to tenet this as it Is l,la,ran,l, al wo i ;L ... .... .":It -""ti e'll E1r "'reptian of ne'-., 'Cress. Council skipped to cycle back later. 1). halt ,f f,;—a: Caus,it jj,cl c.,l ,,if b,, al, ric.nimuiod.itien on now ..n ..,.at tem.• pled Ll. zU,tir then. j. . ..... - that 11 "N :1,1 T;1' it". to !it i lir oun,,! w.l, elu,ill, daing he pre,ces, .11 Lhl; ':. ", I ll f", 'If the ",11, 'If Uvf I .f_._ ;,or, : C Ill, i 1 l's' all, j 0,11 ite 1 C tell . lli, 111�114 "I " in 11h, il .... . .. 1, th.11 if C-lull il In tol- en"I in it, F , , ct, 11 .11, l Ill, i ill , Th.,, did ..t ill (it,' '! X ill I I ill'111 Unc P.11i,1 1111 "Ill, ul,tf .urn.. There ..aid 1,11 in 111.r it in Ill, Ill], t 1! Ad,, ary C-1 5A Air — I "o, - .1 tin ---,A i.r. ;-ro- :t! t r ; ios. . . i i 'e'l 1,1-11a I rota .11 r,nir,o 1 11 nq a notion, LL. tn11,4 - ill 1 .1 pp.......: ,, i, , h 1. ."all I h v 1, it r ., t .1 f f to I IrP i I I - 1 crone a n I I tO 1, 11 inn of , r', , t I • ! , i , r i I I • I I -,,a hart en 5e pt f, I I I 1932. ::at On tarried on,l a hou , I V 5.0. ORDINANCE NO. • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, _ CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 2.28.040 AND 2.28.070 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO TERMS OF APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY COMMISSION MEMBERS AND OFFICERS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 2.28.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 2.28.040. Membership - -Terms of Appointment. "All terms shall be for two (2) years. If a vacancy shall occur, other than by expiration of term of office, it shall be filled by appointment by the Mayor with the approval of the council for the unexpired term. Any member appointed to a four (4) year term prior to the 1983 amendment to this section may serve out the remainder of such four (4) year term." SECTION 2: Section 2.28.070 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal • Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 2.28.070. Officers. "A. The Advisory Commission shall select a chairperson to preside at all meetings of the commission. The term of the chairperson shall be one (1) year, commencing on January 1 of each year. The chairperson may be removed by majority vote of the entire Advisory Commission, taken at any regular meeting thereof. In the event a chairperson is removed prior to the expiration of his or her term, the Advisory Commission shall forthwith appoint a successor to serve the balance of tho unex- pired term." SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City Of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1983. Ares: • NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK i:. L Rer_lat n_•_'v i'i'vys 51 "T10`: M1,: Thv dul, upon vbieh and the hour sod 11,110 n[ unfit any rogl Ld n•rt Iu, .hall he held ahnll be fixed by resolution or mtnul, nrtwn of 1111 Cliv Gnuv'il. nl'ie,,, flu ..o1 L y ho.,no it t. r, ,I r liv Advisory Commission ahnli soluct ; pn "Id1 at rt aaur Weavings no n man tl,ly [ot.iting Pa,i.. 9 ORDINAXE NO. R] . 7 AN ORDI:L \n CE Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF ME CITY OP 6A.CCHo COCa1TO%UA, CALIFORNIA, CRLITISC AI: ADVISORY CWf1ISSION TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY To ME CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMISSION. Thv city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamongo, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION Ix There is hereby created and established in the City an Adv l9 ory Comr,i 59ton. Role of Advisory COmmtsstan SECTION ? The Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission shall It to an advisory capacity to the City Council and Planning Commission on community isaoes and perform such other advisory functions as may be delegated to the Advisory Commission from time to lime by Cho Planning Commission or City Council. Advisory ('ommission Membership SECTION l: The Advisory Committee shall consist of a total of fifteen (15) embers with five (5) appointed from each of the three (3) geographic areas designated by zip code in the City of Ranch. Cucamonga, n amly Alta Loma (91701), Cucamonga (93110), and E[ivonda (91739). Members of the Advisory Commission shall be residents of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be appointed by the City Council. The Mayor ball submit t0 the Council the name of any person proposed for appointment to the Advisory Commission and upon such app0 in vent by he Council, the name of the appointee shall be recoede'd in the minutes of the Council meeting. • ' Teems of 1% Sloment SECTION r,; The flftaeo (15) mmhers of the Advisory Cc- mission mini t1a11': appointed shall detoraine the length of their [ems by lot. Thomefter all [e,, .hail be for four (A) year.. three (J) members from each of the three SobcommitteeN (:Alta Loma), (Cucamonga), and (F.tivanda) Shall serve a term of four (a) years and shall continue until their re spurt lye terms expire unless s removed as provided in [his Ordinance. Tv,, (2) members from each of the three (J) subcommitteea shall serve o term of two (2) and shall c nttnne in office until their 1c1,1.tt,c terns expiry unless s net com.aml as provided in this ordinance. If a vac annv shall n , other :ham by expiration of the term of office, It shall be filled by nppnlntment by he Mayor wish the approval 0f the council for the unexpired corm. Removal of Member.. ECTTOV s; Any member Ioc Advisory Connlsalon may be ...oed e1 an by a nynri[y vote of the City Council. In addition, the y time C eof Advisory Corn.l:.:enn may r en—end Co the City C—coll r mo .4 of n eon, of the Advicnry Commission wbo has violated a y meeting attendance pollelee but may' ho es Lihl lahml by maoiutioc. L Rer_lat n_•_'v i'i'vys 51 "T10`: M1,: Thv dul, upon vbieh and the hour sod 11,110 n[ unfit any rogl Ld n•rt Iu, .hall he held ahnll be fixed by resolution or mtnul, nrtwn of 1111 Cliv Gnuv'il. nl'ie,,, flu ..o1 L y ho.,no it t. r, ,I r liv Advisory Commission ahnli soluct ; pn "Id1 at rt aaur Weavings no n man tl,ly [ot.iting Pa,i.. 9 am tes srgin': B: The Seerrtnry of the Commtcvton shall c use ebe r..i nu [rs cular, adlournvd rr¢u la r, and special neetin, to be kept; and sea It. as . cs ible after each meets og, c racy of the ,fast" to bent ,rdvd t rash ranch" of the Covmisston and to 'no City Clerk. The CityaCl, rk of drsfgnec will s r, a as secretary for the Advisory Commission. e v SECTION: 9: the 9oyor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk sh.tfl ac te,,r to [he sc, and the City Clerk .shall cause the same to be published vl Chin fifteen (15) days after its ptsaage, at leas[ ante In ITC 2aV ae`ert, a nrv,spaper of general circulation published in he City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucazonga, California, PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 1979. AYES: Schlosser, Yikela, Palumbo, Bridge, Frost TOES; Nooe ABSENT: None ATESS: ❑ty CAc rk a � L • • • is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gi}CAUQN STAFF REPORT I 1-\1 ' July 30, 1982 TO: City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager RE: Recommendations Regarding Revisions to Ordinance No. 87 Establishing a Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission At the City Council's request, staff has reviewed the Ordinance establishing the Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission to determine potential ways of improving the level of participation by individual members of the Commission and identifying organizational changes that could be made to improve the overall effectiveness of the Advisory Commission. The following report will hopefully outline some viable options for the Council to consider. At its June meeting, the Advisory Commission discussed potential areas of change to improve the overall effectiveness of the Advisory Commission. The following represents Commission recommenda- tions that the City Council may wish to consider in attempting to improve the overall effectiveness of the Advisory Commmission: Formalize the Structure - The Commission suggested that each of the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga and Etiwanda appoint a Chairman to help encourage individual participation and consider the appointment of a single chairman (chairperson) and alternate for the entire Advisory Commission. Currently meetings are chaired on a rotating basis with little formal structure on the community (Alta Loma, Cucamonga, Etiwanda) level. 2. _Encourage Communication - The Advisory Commission felt the overall. participation would improve if more individaul participation and communication was encouraged at the Community (sub - committee) level. Upon creation of the Advisory Commission, it was common for each of the sub- Continued.... Revisions to Ord. 87 July 30, 1982 Page Two • committees to meet on a separate basis apart from regular committee - commission meetings to discuss issues within their own communities. More recently, this participation at the local level has been less frequent. 3. Appoint City Council Delegate to Advisory Commission - The Commission recommended that a City Council delegate be appointed to attend regular Commission meetings to encourage communication between the Advisory Commission and City Council. Council delegates could be appointed on a rotating basis or alternates assigned. 4. Advisory Commission Exposure to Community - It was suggested that the Commission's role and activities be more publicized to encourage citizen participation and create a general awareness of the the importance of the Commission. Several suggestions included Grapevine coverage of the Commission activities, more acknowledgement from the City Council of Commission accomplishments, and publicizing the mechanics for making input to the Advisory Commission. 5. Chamber of Commerce Exposure - The Commission, as stated • in number 4, felt Commission activities needed more com- munity exposure and expressed a need for the Chamber of Commerce to be more cognizant of Commission activities and their role in the Community. 6. Broaden Scope of Commission Activities - Although the Commission has been involved in review and prioritization of all major City capital projects from Carnelain re- align- ment and landscape improvements to utility undergrounding, the Commission feels their responsibilities should in some way be broadened. 7. Delegate(s) to City Council - The Commission encouraged appointments of commissioners to serve as delegates to the Citv Council to improve communication and liaison activities between the City Council and Advisory Commission members. In addition to the above Advisory Commission suggestions, the City Council may wish to consider other potential areas for improving the effectiveness of the Advisory Commission. Continued..... is Revisions to Ordinance 87 • July 30, 1982 Page Three A. Attendance Polite - A formal policy establishing attendance rules should be considered and adopted by resolution as suggested in Ordinance No. 87 creating the Advisory Com- mission. Whatever attendance policies established should be enforced. However, this may be a mute point if the role of the Advisory Commission is expanded or the mechanical changes in the Advisory Commission improve the leval of participation. B. Variation of Meeting Policy - Currently meetings are held on the fourth Thursday of each month with the exception of a summer recess in the months of July and August. The City Council may wish to consider some variation of that policy. For example, meetings could be held on a quarterly, every other month, or on an as needed basis. Unless the role of the Advisory Commission is greatly expanded, less frequent meetings may provide for more "concentrated" agendas and possibly improve the level of participation. C. Expansion of Advisory Commission Role - The attached memo of May 18, 1982 outlines some potential areas for expanding • the Advisory Commission role. The intent of the memo was to identify some alternatives for expanding the basic role of the Commission and was not intended to down play the importance of a separate Parks and /or Trails Commission. Combining these roles may not be compatible but it does provide a convenient option for expanding the Advisory Com- mission role. ri �J D. Terms of Office - Currently terms of office for Advisory Com- mission members are four years. The City Council may wish to consider limiting terms of office to two years to provide a more "concentrated" length of office. There are, however, obvious advantages to four year terms on allowing members to become acclimated and provide time to become a knowledgeable and productive member of the Advisory Commission. E. Council Committee to Study Advisory Commission Role - The City Council may wish to consider appointing a Council Committee of two members or formally appointing "delegates" as suggested by the Commission to review the role of the Commission when meetings are resumed in September. Communication between the City Council and Advisory Commission may help identify some additional areas 0 1 yea Continued.... Revisions to Ordinance 87 July 30, 1982 Page Four for improving-individual participation and the overall effectiveness of the Commission. Once these are identified, suggested changes could be incorporated into a revised ordinance and considered by the City Council in October. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council direct staff (if appropriate) to prepare a revised ordinance incorporating adopted changes to improve the level of individual participation and the overall effectiveness OZ the Rancho Advisory Commission. JHR /vz Attachments: 1. Ordinance No. 87 Establishing Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission. 2. Minutes of October 17, 1979 and October 3, 1979 • establishing an Ad visory Commission. 3. Minutes of October 4, 1978 appointing members to the Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Conuni[[ee. 4. Minutes of July 19, 1978 detailing a staff report regarding the creation of an Advisory Committee. 5. July 13, 1978 Staff Report re: organization of Community Advisory Committees. 6. June 21, 1978 Staff report regarding Creation of Advisory Committee for Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda Communities. 11 110 aU9 0 411 a yr 1in:vVUV VVVniv v.vvn C�n.n irrt)t MEMORANDUM � ° t 19]7 May 18, 1982 TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager RE: Combination Advisory Commission /Parks and Trails Commission OPTIONS: Have the Advisory Commission serve in both capacities similar to City Council /Redevelopment Agency. When the Advisory Com- mission completes agenda items they move on to Parks and Trails Commission business. This will allow Advisory Commission members to participate in Parks and Trails issues and visa versa. This will help improve agenda format for Advisory Commission (broaden it) and expand role of Parks and Trails Commission so that they fully understand and appreciate consequences of their actions on issues not related to Parks and Recreation. Create sub - committee of Advisory Commission to serve as Parks and Trails Commission. This will insure representative parti- cipation from each of the three areas of Alta Loma, Cucamonga and Etiwanda. It will also insure a sub - committee of individuals who already have a working knowledge of the City and the difficult issues up ahead. There are currently three vacancies on the Advisory Commission. One in Alta Loma (Dennis Stout) and two in Cucamonga (Chuck Buquet and Faye Stamper). Additional people could be added who have a specific interest in Parks and Trails Cor.imission /sub - committee through attrition. Also a review of those currently servinu should be conducted to ascertain their interest in continuing to serve on the Advisory Commission. Because of a lack of attendance by some members or a lack of interest or conflicts with other committee appointments, additional vacancies could be created to infuse "new blood" into the process. Continued.... Combination Advisory Commission /Parks and Trails Commission May 18, 1982 Page Two • 3. Rotation of Advisory Commission /Parks and Trails Commission. A variation of Alternative dumber 1, with the addition of rotating meetings. As an example, the Advisory Commission would sit as such for six months and another six months as Parks and Trails Commission. In other words, meetings would be held monthly with the same 15 members serving as an Advisory Commission in January, Parks and Trails Commission in February, the Advisory Commission in (larch and so forth. The appropriate staff would be available at each of the meetings. While it may be the wish of Council to create a separate Parks and Trails Commission, these alternatives represent a method of expanding the role of the Advisory Commission, while at the same time combining two Commissions that would hopefully have the best interests of the City in mind in their advisory decision making capacity. It has been my experience in working with the Advisory Commission for the past three years that interest wanes when a variety of "meaty" issues are not available for review and comment. While there are certainly a great many Parks and Trails Commission and Advisory Commission "issues ", there may be some merit in combining these two responsibilities to create an atmosphere of continued high interest among the members rather than peaks and valleys. . I still need to prepare a report to you and the City Council regarding some of the concerns stated by the City Council regarding the Advisory Commission as it now exists. Chief among their concerns included exploring ways of strengthening the Advisory Commission, evaluating attendance and interest of current members, and an objective review of the ordinance establishing the Advisory Commission. I hope to have this report completed in the very near future and well in advance of the June 16, 1982 City Council meeting. Please let me know if there are some specific issues that you would like me to deal with in my report. JR /vz a_ l J • Ci,, 011,nnl 17. 1973 pot," 3 • E X.11 501; in-11111.0 III Parnrl II,ln i""', "W"I' Cit; 11,11k 'n't Cit, n It I,, - in I,:, ", tw for ricardiLiOn. Locittont son't, i it Ch,i ,, I and Allhih ild. M!"IT.11111; `0. 79-85 A M 01.1t i CN OF THE CITY f:0CtCIL OF ME CITY 'IF Il:;CNO CI C,,lIONGA, CALHOFNA, APPROVING FARCCL 1L\0 'Utmu l805, PARCEL MUM' NO, 805). k. 'Ein inn '76 =011)9 Ill,, 1,11 linlill,: N - I S Ai i� 76-011)3 - filinIqL, of Scorn iriii Gonnol L,Ilt, of CTIO.at. -o- I Harrod E !4 1 To, =,' n7h� If A.,111, III VIIIII vie -. ('IlLil H-1 I It- T,ttor of Credit (storm drain IllininII) 5171600 AL1o,I roods and III1,111 bond to t1on,firid Hall. no ;I.,, oid" Dli,, bii.Ico Sn,,h.,, and I ... it. PL,f.rLt.,, hLnd (road) $34,OOD T,.Ilr 9631 Ann.pl III&I and Ilain,, bond to Ch.n Realty, Inc. L.i,o,.d on Ipith siul of Banyan between Beryl and Hellman. NrOortiance bond (rood) $70,000 5. it I.IC HFAtll':Cl %1. 88 h••f"ll __.1_i Inr ll-,!in, -hill' fh, , I I, "i nd t�., lot; ir. O'b"' , fro_ A-I "i - 01 - Iii't 'd I.1,1colt :,, M2 111% 1 " �11 I [s;1) recacv - - - — - - - - I'lln - - 15. Rnr III, M, I I It i.n, C,,n ; I I (Zone Ct,,n ,, R� I,,:, II NI. 9- A) S,ol I I,,,t by .i.:-,k Lo.. Thy 1. 11 Ilon, I Ilin n1nI I'll for III to hli.lill- em.n Ih,,,, were no ,-•.I 'nill" IwaflnFi lino 'I"and. potion: Mnv*,d by Palomho, lecondcli by Mi'I, to adopt girdi.onto ti.. 38 w n)d cnt;r,, I, nling. Mori— c arrild by t,,1IOirg VoL, AY!tS: tnhlns.�Ir. �irt .4:, n"! 1vCf: NtIn. fitl, ird , r,,,J 1, d-O.. 0711;A1C:: NO. 83 111 rand 104 0119t;:AtCE Or ME CITY COICti(IT. OF THE CITY OF RA-M!", Cil.;2111 CA. CAI.IrOW:IA, RIZONP4; ASST IO301I PAW11, 22,-111-59 FROM A-I 10 l-2 Nil 38,51, AULS I, IM tlt IT.11 OF lRCOW, 11011 MFT IAqT nF ;NMAITATF, Il. Sv. 11,!i in Nil. 17 ',,lo C,,, I "I I,d l -111 1, 1 i l'. I it •I V., I J be .11,. 1 to 111p. 111,11 1 l l0d I L -. i I th,: I'l rI-). 1. t it I rl it It ro it Ir frllnn - I tort'... I th it %I , w1i I !i re 1•1 ..'rates I Ili RIn. to Cur imnn;.I UIL r, Cn,,..j I.III rot in in I •j , I „r I I I t 1 ., ;lr; ':r 1, 1 n- I : t "; O'll, I '!' ", . ", Ot,I ."It "I In"' oth, I ItM, -11 E.,ln Li,lr,; I, Ar 11l1l,,: to ton Arli,nll' C.ovrni sr trn true C111 COUnelI Nlnaee.q 1h lai•er 11, 1979 Pa CU d rime -en -time by the Planning Coul lop or City Caincil The Clry Attorney sbted that the Adviser, Comaieslon was strictly an advisory group. and they had no decision making Func[ fare or binding policy making functions wber¢ the C11y Council and Plonning Ca•wis.lon did. It would rrg.sitnte a change in taro eldbonce to 'house this. Motion by Paba, laa seconded by Bridge to apprav¢ ordinance if.. B) and waive 'atlas reading was carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Pni acts, BriAga, and Frosr, BOSS: None. ABSENT: none. Title sad comber rud by W.laaerman. OROS::ANCE \O. 87 (second reading) A% ORDINASCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC,OIONGA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN ADVI50RY CVVISSTON M .%CT I:1 AN' ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND P1.. MING CO:CIISSIOM, 1 C. Ord to mce No 64 -C bef r C ncll a an or onev .tend the mora- tar�. Report by Jack Lam. On August 15, 1979 the Clry Council approved an egt ... 1. of Ordinance Mo. 64 [d Nnvcober 8, 1979, Newest' in light of recent development. sad the progress of " tbn Growth N.a.gament Plan, it la ne<e.tary to consider an extension 10 the serelori:w. Nayar opened the oeetlng foe pub Ur hearing. Ben Gillis. 8ull4ing Industry A.soctarion, spoke in apposition [o an extenaiae of 1ha moratorium to Aligner 1980- Since no one else wiebed I. address the Connell, the mayor closed the public hearing hn stated the date in the ordinance vas only for the eAesp.L.o of the adeacari,w and was not the date for the Growth Management Plan. Ken Willis clarified that he Was referring to [1le filing dates an the growth Management plan. However, the Suilding Industry wished tloo the Growth Aanagesent Plan would be adapted yui Ckty. A d.ne to extend the moratorium was discussed by founr.il. Mr. Us pointed out ll,¢ oorl last dace would be Juana, 1, 1980 if the C.onal were confidant they would pn.gs an ordinance an ohm firs[ reading dating Nevemher. Nation: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Pal.ba to edayt Ordinal. No. 64 -C, inert the daze of Jammry 1, 1980 In Section 2, and to Waiva entire rending. Meeinn tattled by (-flowing onto: AYES: Schlosser. Mikels, Pa lomhn, Rrtdle, end FI -1. i01 :5: Nero. AgSM: Kona. Title .cod somber u:ad by Vns.<r coma. ORMU :A9CL NO. 64 -C iv [gear,) A. OROI'AM: OF VIN CITY COOSCIL OF TIIIt CITY OF MOCIIO CL'C.VVX;r..A, Y %TEiZ)VZ6 7111: MORATORUN I:IPOSI:n OF oROC:,IVf.R 1:0. 64 ANn nCOL.lR I. ^.n Tllr. URf:fINCY 1L1:111:0i'. L P I 1 • cf r: ru n: 1 m t..s o: bq,a ). 11919 79 50. ., ;ativ,• DI I l n ration uuI Znnw Chan a. N _)9 -nn. -_e 1111.m (,all act i,m fl,.i r.l:e of r uh, from A -1 (II.:ted a !• cILure) to >1-1 Oln nv, ind, tr is 1) tic 93.55 acres of Land loctiOd a the north side of Arrow, approximuviy 1300 foot east If Inters[.;« 15. The Pl.mn fn? Conssisslah reeommuodea that Lho City Council adopt Onilnovoe N . 88 approving the is.su nce of a Segntivc Dcc,1 .,tfun .and zone Chdnge Nn. :9 -118. Stuff repua by I.,& I,- the necti, wa. opened for public hearing, motel Plies, o m —n11,1 of G titl—n11,1 of the peopertl and rearcs,•ntiol Duuld Roves, . e in ne upport of the z e <hungu. He stated he wished the record indi- r.,te l hrre.red a d .aonaorten the is :nonce of a ncgatiee decfa raemn and npprnval of the zone change. The I, iblic ho acing vas closed • SFy Re��_t fur an Ord[na_ =rc astnblf sM1 ing a Rancho Cnc a Advlso ry f.onm f -_.cte a. e Advi,u, Committee recotsmendod Ordinance No. 87 he referred to ehe Cic, C hell (.r c.nsideration. The ordin;mce inat Jes a statement on the general role of the \dvi iLlly C.-nissieo. composi tiin Of membership. terms of h".I.t1hri1 removal of ,, no•. ., ect O,Rs, o((irers, and minute taking. Staff ceport by Jin Robinson. Rr iJ ge s '-d but Council hod r eived n letter requewting that the Committee rtf Uut input from home of Lhe industrial groups and cervlce oreanfxattons instead Of juet 'u fng a humeothers' group. He felt chat perivips Council should comfder the n•q ues t. T'ue ncvttr; vrs opened for public hearing. H11'.e Unkiu su[od the Committee represented homenunen: whose interest ens in the unity a d that the group should comprise only of citizens who ire interested in [heir memuni[y. Sharon 9 -,em stated [hoe must on be Committee also worked In the ,. ce— nity. I'nnv Co-r, President of the Chamber of Comnorco. rend the fallovinn, from o let4a which hid n.,en sent in the Comte it: "It i rin• I.., —. t of the Rnnrd of Directors tbit when v. s m neles ter ni tltc c Adul;u. C.,. ,i Ul— m.t d••eLL imt h, Rive a n , apnnlnt L,,; it lcast one ind —tit, If/ , n eat eel Ind:ei.: ill to writ of Ibu r;vcgraph id nnitr within thr oaitl1,. Ii., 11 Id" v cu e iue,• i• -1'..1 .brted be had not P" 't tlo- 11, , t1 tra v chi. Itad dl .cn .11-11 . Ile vILI II -II rn tlm C.oL,'I1 111 s 11 pinL•n. ni the! .n , tr inn n the II, tee. 11 _ -)1/ Motiin: Moved by Scblosser. by alkcls to approve ordinance No. 88, sec Oe[u'•er 11 for second seconded reading,cod v hi.o entice reading. Hatton c fed by full -in,; v AYES: Schlosser, HSkels, Palmba, Bridge, Frust.arNCr,S; None. III:. and number read by Wasaeman. ORDINANCE N'0. 88 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CODICIL of THE CITY OF RANCHO MCAMONLA, CALIFORNIA. REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL M11DER 339 - 021 -59 FROM A -1 TO ti -1 FOR 18.56 ACRES LOCATED OS THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW • 1100 FEET EAST OF INTERSTATE 15. • SFy Re��_t fur an Ord[na_ =rc astnblf sM1 ing a Rancho Cnc a Advlso ry f.onm f -_.cte a. e Advi,u, Committee recotsmendod Ordinance No. 87 he referred to ehe Cic, C hell (.r c.nsideration. The ordin;mce inat Jes a statement on the general role of the \dvi iLlly C.-nissieo. composi tiin Of membership. terms of h".I.t1hri1 removal of ,, no•. ., ect O,Rs, o((irers, and minute taking. Staff ceport by Jin Robinson. Rr iJ ge s '-d but Council hod r eived n letter requewting that the Committee rtf Uut input from home of Lhe industrial groups and cervlce oreanfxattons instead Of juet 'u fng a humeothers' group. He felt chat perivips Council should comfder the n•q ues t. T'ue ncvttr; vrs opened for public hearing. H11'.e Unkiu su[od the Committee represented homenunen: whose interest ens in the unity a d that the group should comprise only of citizens who ire interested in [heir memuni[y. Sharon 9 -,em stated [hoe must on be Committee also worked In the ,. ce— nity. I'nnv Co-r, President of the Chamber of Comnorco. rend the fallovinn, from o let4a which hid n.,en sent in the Comte it: "It i rin• I.., —. t of the Rnnrd of Directors tbit when v. s m neles ter ni tltc c Adul;u. C.,. ,i Ul— m.t d••eLL imt h, Rive a n , apnnlnt L,,; it lcast one ind —tit, If/ , n eat eel Ind:ei.: ill to writ of Ibu r;vcgraph id nnitr within thr oaitl1,. Ii., 11 Id" v cu e iue,• i• -1'..1 .brted be had not P" 't tlo- 11, , t1 tra v chi. Itad dl .cn .11-11 . Ile vILI II -II rn tlm C.oL,'I1 111 s 11 pinL•n. ni the! .n , tr inn n the II, tee. 11 _ -)1/ Cin, Counril Minn.. s Occobcr ), I9i9 Page 5 Pahlie he.viog vas ,bled. Nagar m uldc alu'a c rats reM nlipe the nrdincc. Ne 10nted tM1ac Suc Ginn 1 spool" ruilcct the .m Cunncil'S n itincil intent to make the geographic beuednries by zip ceder, net by < aps natty n. Suction a -- he felt tha pe t perha the tern of ufficc m v be tae long. 1r1 Schlosser wanted to continue the item Au he ce+ld have time to look into the 1 diifercnre between ' mmittec" and o omission ". Lauren Hasse.m Stated that tie Cavarnment Code did not 11,11 out any in the two terms. However, mace cities +wed the term "commission" when A group functioned independently and nod. decisions apart from the Council; such as the Planning Commission and Hiscoriral Cn...ts.inn. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No. 87 with the change using zip codes to identify the three elrossumi,las, set october 17 for second reading, and waive the entire reading. Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. Title and number read by Nassem... ORDINANCE NO. 87 (firs[ reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN ADVISORY COMMISSION TO ACT IN AN Al [SORY CAPACITY To THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION. SD. Vl -tion of A -onion of Banvan Street - Tract 9444, Report by Lloyd Hubbs. This to the second phase cf abandonment of a puettem of Banyan Street iron Anethvst to 3e0 feet easterly. Thu area to be abandoned is being replaced by relocation o. I Barran through the tract developed of Tract No, 9544, Notion: Moved by Bridge, attended by Palombo to approve Resolution N.. 79 -77 ordoring the vacation of a portion of Banyan, and to waive entire reading. Meeting epenad for public hearing. Dung Hm+e anaw.,ed the question which had been raised by Council as to who the property caters were to the north and south. On the northerly side the property was nod by Mark III Homes. To the south, the owner was Mr. leuebAker, a lemon graver. The public h.•aria, vas closed. MOtinn by Bridge and secandcd by Palombo to approve the Resolution was approved by the fallowing vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOrS: None. wnveren. read title and nunbcr. RF.SULUTION N0, 79 -77 A RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ` OF RA%CH0 CUCARIAGA, CALIFOW;1.\, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STA'rl: OF CALIFORNIA. OWNING TO Ill. V\CATFA, A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET AS L SHOWN ON A MAP (ND. V -001) OS FILL IN 1111 OFFTr1: I1F' Till: CITY CLERK OF THE: CITY OF RANCHO CNC\!h IGd. h_ CIl'1'_W\9 _fl.WS STAFF KPOHTS. fie, 't- L.e� ;t, i r , Adeiv_nrv_Cnrmit, _,_for k-fmnl of Pndia +ore _n. )fl y+rn e_I �l i in _fur t1 .IL nl Sou San, Fir I[un b •n delta d tram the A1,1.14 I Lanier in tin. snattn, and LaA ba.v+ rcl.r rod b.l,k t" th, Advisary Cnmmlthn• a ...t with all n + v In narvie A, Meeting wmuW he held an '.nvrrAer l at n place in be a... un ... I l.,I,r. 0 E city council Minutes October 6, 1970 page $ CRI05sifG The Central School Distllrt Board of Trustees had Gl'.\:OB requested that a crossing guard be placed at he inter - ectio0 of Archibald Avenue and Church Street for students at the Cucamonga Jr, High School. A s r— had been taken and nationally accepted traffic warrants had been met. It v s decided he School Ois[ric[shonld a Pay 50% of the cost Of the crossing guard. Mr. John McCleery a, Assistant Superintendent, was present and spok r e regard ing the needs far the crossing The School Board had not authorized the shariag of the cost, therefore, he would have to rake this back to the Board for approval. Motion: Moved by West, s c ended by Palombo to approve the request by the Central School Di atrlet Board of Trustees for the placement of a crossing guard at Archibald and Church at a cps, t. be shared at 50% with the School District, and that the Sheriff's Department au Id be responsible for the personnel. Motion Otani a.. al: carried. Mikels asked about the other requests for crossing guards which the Council had received. Wasserman sold these had _ been referred to the Traffic Committee. • CO:TUCT Approval o. r contract with John Blayney WI_II LI BYNEY and Associates to preparea zoning map was requested by Jack Lam. I F`1 20NIZ, MdF Motion: Moved by Mikels, s e ended by West to approve the em agreent with John Blayne, avd Associates to do the toning map and sign an agreement. Motion canted by the following vote: AYES: Palumbo, Mikel.e, Ernst HOES: West ABSENT: Schlosser B f.C!'BS At 9:35 p.m. Mayor hose called a recess. The meeting reronen'. d at 9:55 p.m. with all present. NrElw9 T The subJoct of the Chit.... ,. \dr isory remmlttee appoint - 001MITTEES man[ was insetted at this paint In the agenda by the Cmmcil. From rho 917)0 lCimamnng,t ire .,) T. 11,11.11 Ailvn, Cbnrles J. 9u9uet. 111, E.vnn .9. McCall, Faye E. Stamper, Joseph E. SLOEl, Jr. From Iry 917n) (Aloe Lomn are .,) L Mar, Parluw, 11,11,10 Blanrbn rd, Shot Baocrn, Dem,l: L. Sin I 11 I. IUnC Zink in. From 11:,1 91739 (ECl wand., arua) Do0111 11 .1,1, Mary V. Lane. GL,nn goo[in. .loo I:blty. John F. Vl.w m. Yo l,an: Mnv,-.I be Palumhn, by West to o [he rcn� - -. nLrt LAOS Inr lbo Ailv!sury f_iltict. Mr, i11 n,anl- n.. 11�. 1. Coi it 1gm1111 .off r, 0lo,lnl ind h'id uals and tali A nev[ang for J¢ehel 19 a[ 6:)11 I'.c. City Council Ylnutes Jul;: 19, 1978 Pal✓ 4 ADflc,%N LO)Ca T`F.IS ,".115':AY cn,. ST Rr[r vcl Mr. Nasserean presented a report regarding the Advisory Coast etees. A written staff report had been presented to each council member. Briefly, each of the three committees would raddlis, of five members each with two - year terms on a rotating basis. They would all meet i at the same clap, thus cutting dam staff time. Suggestion s to have meetings at 4:30 p.m. -- perhaps rotating the meeting place. Staff representative a be Include would be the City Manager or his designate. Potential areas of involvemens were suggested In areas of Planning, Par% and Recreation, Transportation, Public Safety, Cornnnity Goals, Capital Improvements heeds. This list I. only suggestive and not complete. Discussion followed about the re ap.nse from the application wb ich had been minimal. It we decided that each Cnuncil man appaint a rep re rents give from each of the three a ear to so me. City staff would send an application fore to everyone who had applied to serve on the Planning Commission. Hest hoped this would also appear In the papers to give it ad re publicity. For a deadline -- August 31 was set with hopes to announce members of the Committees on September 5. It vas decided to use a person's zip code as representing the Community he would be represeneing. 1 Schlosser felt there should be some rather strict regula- 111 clans for ,cabers of the Committees. Fore ample, missing three consecutive meetings would mean automatic replacement, Mr. Warrantee cc,.,ced this item to be continued until August 16. Request granted. SPI'C IAL Mr. Fmpey made the presentation tm hold a special <a nsus CL I.SIS for Rancho Cucamonga. It was the only way the state until spree to our actual population and vas needed to determine the subventions Ve would be allowed. In order to have a special census the City would have to provide: City maps, which would have to be mailed to Sacramento prior to the census; office space; telephones: staffing; etc. Lcvt to conduct the censor would be 511,000, genefirl for nmPle -- if she populntion re,, at a2,000, It would cake the City app roslmae e. ly nee year t0 recover. Mntllm: Nnvod by Hest, ascended by Palumbo to approve the 4 sportal remsu with fun.Wcoming from chu contingency Nod. Muttonunanimnnrsly carried. Mr. IlVbin: made (Ida pre.'llltatien wilts) as a result of ding, rOp :ri i`ti CI- ,ado it the duly 19. 19?S melting. i {c.., IC .u.PUgr - -_ - Mr, Ha r: surmnn rend title of It"alntlnn. RF.SOWTlOA NO. 73.40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COBV'OI1, of THE CITY OF R,V ;CMG CMUONCA, CALIFO,a NIA, ESTABLLSHi6O TMRoCCR HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC CON7101, DEVICCS WITHIN TIIE CITY OF %tNCIO) C^hhNC.1. ^-1 � 0 11 E M 0 R A N D U M DATE: July 13, 1978 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren 11. Wasserman 0— City Manager /"' SUBJECT: Organization of Community Advisory Committees The City Council has requested the staff to prepare a more detailed recommenda- tion concerning the formation and actual operation of the Community Advisory Committees which were approved by the Council in June. The primary purpose of these three advisory committees is to serve as advisors to the Council on matters of concern in each of the three geographical areas which comprise the City of Rancho Cucamonga, ORGANI7.A1'10N OF ADViSORI' CO141ITTF.ES • It is recommended that each of the three advisory committees consist of five membo rs;�o lectc_d for two year terms. The terms should be staggered, so that in itiall y .some terms will be for one year while the remainder will be 'for two years. Because of the heavy demands for staff assistance, it is suggested that all groups meet together on a monthly basis. Meeting locations should be rotated throughout the City in order to encourage full citizen participation. It is further suggested that meetings of the Advisory Committees be scheduled to begin at 4:30 p.m. This schedule worked very well with Lite School Task Force. STAFF rARTICIPATION It is rc,:w mondod that Lite City t1anager or his designated representative serve as all ""..- ofricio" morl of the Committee. It is, in our view, essential that a ;t,'..;f ivc hr in attcud.nu'o in order to answer questions which may m'i.rr nom rroinp, (:it;: In'w;tlris or policio!;. In addition, till, staff will be available to work with (ho Advisory Committees in propnring proposals for eansideration:; by the City Council, PoinrL1f AREAS 01'_ 1NVOLVEMEAT Tloo City':: ;aa nn +;rm,ml tva:u I;.n; spent considerable time discussing the possible areas of involvement for the. Advisory Committees. Tile (bllowing list represents some of tho n,,Jet policv issuos facing our City which may be an appropriate area Of invoiVement for our newly created Advisory Commtttoos: C C CiLy Council -2- duly 13, 1979 • POTENTIAL AREAS OF INVOLVEMENT -- (continued) 1. Planning Design Element Architectural Review Advance Planning Water Quality Issues Air Quality Issues Sphere of Influence 2. Park and Recreation Regional Park Needs Human Service Needs - Seniors, Handicapped, etc. 3. Transportation Preparation of Circulation and Trans rtation Element of General Plan a' )/•j" �Cr Study of Equestrian Trail Needs L' • Study of Bikeway Needs 4. Public Safety Crime Prevention Programs Neighborhood Alert Programs Unmet Public Safety Needs 5. Community Coals City Name T I City Identicy Community Promotion Hi.s Loric Preservation Civic / Community Town Center 6. Capital In1�nn'emcnt Needs Establish Priority program Car City's Needs • Cv. 1A0 City Council -3- July 13, 1976 • ISFOItI MONAL FLOW It is extremely important that our Advisory Committees be fully informed re- garding City programs, priorities and policies. Therefore, all members of the Advisory Committees will receive copies of the agendas for both City Council find Planning Commission meetings. In addition, excerpts of staff reports concerning issues which may affect any of the three geographical areas of the City will be included with the copies of the agendas. In this manner, members of the Committees will have an opportunity to review the issues and the staff reports prior to the meetings of the Planning Commission or City r Council. . AREAS OF CONCERN�_QY�� -7 The City management team is very concerned that the Advisory Committees not usurp the responsibility and authority of either the Planning Commission or the City Council. For this reason, we have provided opportunities for members of the Advisory Committees to keep abreast of current issues by reviewing agenda materials on a timely basis. On current issues - particularly those relating, to land use planning - the committee members will have an opportunity to state their views at the Council or Planning Commission meetings. • If the Advisory Committees are to be workable, a major commitment of staff tine and financial resources is essential. The preparation of agendas and rcpnrLS for the Committees will result in added expense to the City as well as a loss of available staff tine, by limiting the number of meetings scheduled each month, the staff will still have time to deal with not only day -to -day issues, hut, more importantly, the long -range City policies and programs which are an essential element of any successful, well - managed municipality. The formation of Advisory Committees also requires that certain trade -offs be made. The success of the committees is, in our view, dependent upon a com- niLnent of staff resources. Staff lnvolvemunt in committee activities reduces the Limo nvailnhle for both day -to -day and 1011^_ -term priorities. Must other cities which have utilized advisury Commi aces h.tvc also provided a full -time staff liaslon. Rancho Cucamonga could neither justify nor afford this luxury. In nddiLiun, it should be noted that there are exponsrs related to the formation of Advisory Sluff tire, 01 hough not a "direct, hard dollar espcn::c •• is nn Indirect expmlse to the City llCC(I119e staff would be working ni other projects it it were not involved in the Advisory Committee work. P,,;tage, fen'rduct ion costs, find other related expenses will also be absar6ad in the current year's operational budget. It if; i,;n if! <OnI to note that the po tent I al problems fire not pointed out merely to Ceat d neg,itive vto•.' Lnwdfd the creation of the Ad ViSOry COrlmitte L`S. Rattler, we want the City Connc.il and the CitizenS of R.atu•ho Cucamonga to he fully aware of not only the positive, but also the negoLtve aspects of the Advisory Cnn"ittro f,triul.0 ion. The City Council may be assured that the staff will make every effort t0 carry out the directive of the City Council to imple- ment Lil- Advisory Committee proposal. 1r ? Ic - l C City Council -4- July 13, 1978 • In summar v, the role of the Advisory Committees can be meaningful to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, particularly, since those committees can provide a valuable link between Che City Council and the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. It is vitally important, however, that the activities of these groups not undermine or interfere with the responsibilities of either the Planning Commission or the City Council. Those responsibilities have been clearly designated in the State law, and they cannot be delegated to any other group. LIU: ban M �QZ • • Clt, Council Agenda -8- Joe, 21, 1918 G. PI'4LIC 41!r1N CL:; APPEAL OP P1.. \)_11 %f g0`p1I S5i 0:: G!'CIS`0`: - pen_1 of Zinc stir taller WS7 -51. wader nod castle White. 9r. and its. Ville previcosla requested rL,nning Co-..miS :ion approval of variance to split o 1`s i parcel for the purpose of building their c rpersnnal residence. If approved, the rorL of the parcel would be used for the perprse of handing another house for resale. According to On, plans submitted In the Plnnninc C.,1111 mu, o of be paining lots would be less thin the minimum area requirement of the existing P.L- 20,000 zone. The remaining parcel would be approximately 1),]00 s,urr.• feet, Tho action taken by the Planning Commission v to deny the con, arianm request based on the findin;c that the surrounding , erty o s Pureha.arvl 1111 properties with tbI expectation of minimum I. a pareelt. in addition, expressed regarding environmental factors and potential pr,L .lit cesspools. 11. T1;hLIC HEARING; AFPE.11, OF PLANNING ClIVISSII`V OEC,IS1 ^9 - Si ce Plan Apnroval 696 -23 (Repuest For sr:_ n_ annrnrnl of .l'uSi1 Oil Service Station). Mlbil Oil Co. Ind Property Investme,Is hest, Inc. have appealed the decision of the Planning Commission denying a self- service stollen and denying the mudificatiun of a location and LAc,,Io,ment permit which vas originally submitted prior to the City's incorporation. The u s denial of the application v . s based on the r erdation of In, Count, Planning. Dc,o eat and was based upon 0. follovinindings: 1. That the site proposed is not adegvaeo in sire and shape to a cco mmodate cold use hoc parking and loading areas. 2. That the site for the ....need ore has inadequ s � ate a s the site relates to streets and ltglvm :s properly desicned Is to width and improvement type to carry the quantity ,ad kind of traffic 6enu,a,rd by the proposed use. J. The sign standard has not been met. 4. A a ry (re x .. licis Would not be In harnony with the original co ceps of the shopping center. ). .,toff Reports A. RI :PrRT RtnARDJ:M CRF.ATIna OF, ACVISORY COtOlITTh:E FOR ALTA Lfgb \. cucati CC,\, ,_tf�'r fl: 1: Y1)A_f0_gIUNITli3. TI m Ci.v Council I,a, askrd the staff in p,,pArr a n•pnrt and r .men;la[inn c "111:1; lio c cat b•n of Adviva,y coon. I;, f .: of tl :. Ih.... .... tellies ^rh r11 es :•nor .. tho Fill of Rnn UV, Cneienma. plo,"o—d that a five_ ddv v Cn: ell be ap.n,ntrJ frpv toll, 'If IT,, 1 m ,Itios to advise ll th.Or I .r Cm:m II , - clatin, m land -n sr .L :nnincY con soot[ori on i...1 I'll ariwl I'Lnen rupn ed , I, u.,I , "'. n .: and r I of mr b :d :, In hlI n. In add lLion, „eh Ads,.ory Cmme l lrmlld be hra I ItIn, whi:it n , I"ign :A by ,he C.,tY Council. I •1' at If "FILL' 'nq1 Ate .,, . I: ana be h. I•: „ :.Il rho IIIr., :t: I n,l,. In l .n 11,, ILI ... II. It Lotlwr red Cho, 111' C,ily fnllnol it le"1011 I boll ,t f. It nlr .led : .elv,.nry F1. .q'•Igr to ,be City f, ml r" II',II r nn:,l n -1111 vl.!I In sn1Lrit r,r : :I v n i :, v fret tho Inlet Ally 111 . "1nv of fa qn Ltivalvla vrry is :• Club.o.nd Ih,e Ral,rle, tl Col r CIL. nv of C'. . 51ItI'!'It L,r "I AIli roll r,.,nnciP, .Iron LI b`pn :e, i :d !:v thg City %n,"n, r Ill, repro —o Lit ,vr. 11 ,. AL.o . :rt :.d tL.lt a city r :il n lr sell' .s le r_Ihlr in, inn- votlnp H II,ol to earl of the title, advise,, ! B[nul, s �6 City Council Agenda -4- June 21, 1978 It is the staff's viiew that the creation of Advisory Councils for P.tiwanda. Cucamonga, and Alta Loma may be extremely ':ulpf ul to the City. While it is probable [bat the advisor• groups will be interested primarily in planning issues initially, tha groups call serve 1,1 In excellent vehicle for fnformiog the City Council of how the ci[iuns of Rancho Cucamonga feel regarding .,,jet policy gnestfons in oar City. If the City Council wishes to establish Advisory Councils, the City staff will incorporate the review of all development plans into our procedures for handling all planning issues. It is recommended that no development plane be forwarded to the City Council until it has been reviewed by the - rPI.Pclata advisory council. In many inscanees, comment may be solicited fret all three advisory Stoups. In l ary, the creation of three Advisory Councils m v half, somewhat to preserve the tonsionlite fdentiry which has been di.aniased during our Central Plait meetings, More importantly, tho prc,cn use of Advisory C-os Lls staii .strungtben rout overall planning process unisid erzbly by providing greater opportunity for Input from our citizens. With the recent reduction In r venues for municipalities, it may ca continue to be necessary to sn w the views of o citizens an a regular basis regarding the services which we need in our City. B. REPORT ON STATUS OF PENDING 205E CHANGES .. .. The foliuwing ro change requestn have been received by the Ptanoing Cepar[ -ent. However, due to their nature, some have a reasonable probability Of being inconsistent with the proposed General Plan. 1, PCOposal! gene change item. F -P -2 to R -d 181 -18 V Local lour S/s Baseline, approx 115' W/e vineyard f Ap,licant! Jerry Rodgers Analysis: Site is located i n a flood control basin with c cial and public s0nalto she nmrrn and n park to the east. Zoning is F -P -2 to Ile east and south and R -1 to the north and vest. The proposals for the General Plan calls for various residential densities and flood control. 2. Proposal: Zone change from 1,000 -R -1 -T to A -1 A94 -66 Lnration: N/a 19th St, approximately 085' W/o Amethyst Applicants Kenneth Oyler Ann I is: Site 51 located in an existi, residential neighho rhood with R-0 arming on the lies, north and east. To the south is d -1 The applicant is 1,uestiag the A -1 r e 1. permit a commercial ministry. the proposals for the General Plan calls for residential or mix uses. J. Proposal Zone change from R -1 If, C-2 091 -82 Loenti nn: E/, ArebibalA appro.e l50' H/n Devon S, Ap,liennu Redo Sbcllre Analyaiso Site is lecarnd in an esnabllahad residential neighborhood, with R -I xonin0 s inAine. Tie prnpraels for the Ureral Plan ,:all, re, re.ruluntial. ,. in nit l: Zane I,n,rco fron, A -1 to C -2 11:1 -81 1.•v.nlmn f4l`, till tmLa wctlnn of Pnnlldil and ln inns tntn l5 Ap Pli,,,ot. WlIll.a Longiry Analysis: Tho r. 11, iv Ill'u r.1 Ina .11111. a 1 Tbn r, 1 -I in all dinati,•n :^ with I -J. A M I Inr,l:rr w,It111p Th,• Cennral Plan propnso Ls call, fur 7.1i, Indu,triol. r� 1 ? .0 q 14 0 • J • I 9 ;y nrmv nc n n urvn rr rr A nannrr_A Attached is a letter from Mr. Steven Sensenbach to waive the provision of Ordinance No. 58 requiring street improvements for residential additions exceeding 650 square feet. (See Section 12.08.050 of attached Municipal Code.) The proposed addition will add 1,792 square feet clearly falling within the provision of the Code. In the past, Council has always upheld the provision of th Ordinance but allowed lien agreements for future construction where sufficient justification exists for delaying improvements. In this case where surrounding lands are undeveloped and subject to extensive improvements in the future, it would seem appropriate to delay improvement for construction with surrounding development. Staff would, therefore, support a request to delay the improvements subject to execution of a lien agreement by the applicant. This option has been presented to the applicant and rejected. The applicant has expressed his desire and thrust of his appeal is complete waiver of improvements. The provisions of Ordinance No. 58 (Municipal Code Chapter 12.08) do not provide for this eventuality. If the Council should wish to grant this appeal, it would require either amendment of the Code or a reduction of Sierra Vista to a special design street of its current configuration. Staff would recommend neither of these options. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council deny the appeal and uphold the provisions of Ordinance No. 58 by requiring that either the improvements be installed or that a lien agreement be executed to guarantee future construction. Respectfully ui�tted Attao ments ,�'s STAFF REPORTro�- vc'o j zj ! Ct OA DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager 1977_ FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Request for Waiver of Street Improvements - Steven R. Sensebach- Residential Remodel Attached is a letter from Mr. Steven Sensenbach to waive the provision of Ordinance No. 58 requiring street improvements for residential additions exceeding 650 square feet. (See Section 12.08.050 of attached Municipal Code.) The proposed addition will add 1,792 square feet clearly falling within the provision of the Code. In the past, Council has always upheld the provision of th Ordinance but allowed lien agreements for future construction where sufficient justification exists for delaying improvements. In this case where surrounding lands are undeveloped and subject to extensive improvements in the future, it would seem appropriate to delay improvement for construction with surrounding development. Staff would, therefore, support a request to delay the improvements subject to execution of a lien agreement by the applicant. This option has been presented to the applicant and rejected. The applicant has expressed his desire and thrust of his appeal is complete waiver of improvements. The provisions of Ordinance No. 58 (Municipal Code Chapter 12.08) do not provide for this eventuality. If the Council should wish to grant this appeal, it would require either amendment of the Code or a reduction of Sierra Vista to a special design street of its current configuration. Staff would recommend neither of these options. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council deny the appeal and uphold the provisions of Ordinance No. 58 by requiring that either the improvements be installed or that a lien agreement be executed to guarantee future construction. Respectfully ui�tted Attao ments ,�'s • 0 rO�cnxrotc gy O 197] March 29, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .v.,Jon D. Nikela C..n.d,,.a,r.. Charles J. Bagoet 11 Jamea C. Frost Richard A1. Dahl Phillip D. Svhlosser Mr. Steven R. Sensenbach Vineyard National Bank P. O. Box 727 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: Request for Waiver of Street Improvements Dear Mr. Sensenbach, At its April 6, 1983 meeting, the City Council will be holding a public hearing to consider waiving street improvements regarding your residential additions. The meeting will be held at 7:30 pm in the Forum at the Lion's Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. If you have any questions, please contact the Engineering Division. Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOP MENT DEPARTMENT EpfN/jGI�N EERING DZV IO LLORH B. H /BS City, Engineer LBIi: jaa 9320 BASELINE ROAD, SUITE C e POST OFFICE BOX R07 - ZNKCIy CUCAMONGA,C P 399 161 524 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED IVA.; NO INSO RANCE COVERAGE PROVmEO- NOT FOR NTERNATIONAL MAIL See Revnael �s�£6e,en Sensenbach r•,., end No. P. O. Box 727 rr; n oo. ki' ,Rancho Cucamonga, 91730 'I nJed Fe• 1f Re \tl � <tsd D�•ii ,r, Fn. -� I TOTAL Poaaa9a and Foes S of 12.08.010 -- 12.08.020 B. Any person violating any of the provisions of sub- sections A, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K, L, M or 0 of Section 12.04.010, after having been once advised that such activity is unlawful, is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than six months or fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Ord. 85 552, 3, 1979). Chaster 12.08 DEDICATION OF RIGHT -OF -WAY 12.08.020 Streets and hichways -- Dedication requirements. No building or structure shall be erected, enlarged or altered and no property shall hereafter be im proved for parking purposes, and no building permit shall be issued therefor, unless one -half of the street, which is located on the same side of the centerline of the street as such lot, has dedicated right- cf -wav for the full width of the lot along all street frontages so as to meet the master plan and /or standards for such street. In addition to required dedication for street purposes, additional dedication for storm drain, sewer, dater or other utility purposes may also be required in connection with buildinc permits where such dedication is necessary to prevent the flooding of adjacent or nearby prorerties or to permit connection to required utilities. (ord. 58 52, 1979). 149 ax1 Sections: 12.08.010 Declaration of need. 12.08.020 Streets and highways -- Dedication requirement. 12.08.030 Offer of dedication. 12.08.040 Construction of public improvements-- Require- ments. 12.03.050 Construction of public improvements--Excep- tions. 12.08.060 Construction of public improvements -- Additional requirements. 12.08.070 12.08.080 Construction agreement. City standards. 12.08.090 No encroachment without permit. 12.08.010 Declaration of need. The lack of full frontace improvements adjoining a lot or parcel occupied or to be occupied by a building, structure or parking lot is found and declared to be hazardous for pedestrians and vehicular traffic and detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the city. (Ord. 58 5i, 1979). 12.08.020 Streets and hichways -- Dedication requirements. No building or structure shall be erected, enlarged or altered and no property shall hereafter be im proved for parking purposes, and no building permit shall be issued therefor, unless one -half of the street, which is located on the same side of the centerline of the street as such lot, has dedicated right- cf -wav for the full width of the lot along all street frontages so as to meet the master plan and /or standards for such street. In addition to required dedication for street purposes, additional dedication for storm drain, sewer, dater or other utility purposes may also be required in connection with buildinc permits where such dedication is necessary to prevent the flooding of adjacent or nearby prorerties or to permit connection to required utilities. (ord. 58 52, 1979). 149 ax1 12.08.030 -- 12.08.060 12.08.030 Offer of dedication. In the event construc- tion or full frontage improvements is not immediately required, any person required to dedicate land by this section shall make an irrevocable offer to dedicate property, executed by all parties having an interest in the property including beneficiaries and trustees of deeds of trust as shown by a current preliminary title report prepared by a title company approved by the city engineer. Such offer of dedication shall be in a form approved by the city attorney and the city engineer, and shall continue in effect until the city council accepts or rejects such offer. (Ord. 58 63, 1979). 12.08.040 Construction of oublic improvements--Recuire- ments. Any person, owner, lessee, or agent constructing or arranging for the construction of any parking lot or commer- cial, residential or industrial building, or buildings, or building addition or alteration, shall provide for the construction or installation to city standards, of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving to the centerline of the street, and necessary drainage structures unless such improvements already exist along all street frontages adjoining the lot on which the building or parking lot is to be constructed, enlarged or altered. (Ord. 58 94, 1979). 12.08.050 Construction of public improvements--Excen- tions. Tae provisions or Sec uon 12.08.040 shall not apply to: A. Alterations; B. Reconstruction; C. An addition to a single .family D. Construction of garages, carports, storage buildings, patio covers, swimming pools, spas, and similar structures, accessory to a single family residence. (Ord. 58 -A 51, 1979: Ord. 58 g5, 1979). 12.08.060 Construction of public imorovements -- Additional reauirements. A. Except as provided in Section 12.08.050, the building official shall deny issuance of a building permit, or deny approval for occupancy or deny final approval and acceptance for public utility connections to any building or parking lot until required full frontage improvements exist, or are constructed or their construction is guaranteed by an executed agreement and cash money deposited with the city in a sum approved by the city engineer based upon one - and- one -half times the estimated cost of construction. B. In the event construction of full frontage improve- ments is not required to be completed within six months after the issuance of the building permit, the city engineer may, at his opticn, reunite that a lien upon the property to be ir.,prcved to created by ccntract between the owner and the 150 e, F k 12.08.070 -- 12.08.090 city as security for the performance by the owner of the construction guarantee agreement instead of a cash deposit. In the event a lien agreement is required pursuant to tha section, no building permit shall be issued until the lien agreement is recorded in the office of the county recorder of San Bernardino, county. (Ord. 58 -B §1, 1960: Ord. 58 §6, 1979). 12.00.070 Construction agreement. The construction guarantee agreement shall be effective on the date of the deposit of cash and shall end unon the date of completion to the satisfaction of the city engineer of all improvements recuired to be made. Upon completion of the imnrovements and their acceptance by the city, the cash denosit shall be returned to the owner. The city is authorized, in the event of any default, to use any or all of the deposit money to cause all of the required work to be done or completed, and for payment of all costs and expenses therefor. Any money remaining shall be refunded to the owner. (Ord. 58 57, 1979). D Chauter 12.12 Sec ions: 12.1.2.010 llur oF prcv;s -c;;s. 12.12.020 Naming criteria. 12.12.030 Ncw streets. 12.12.04; Changing street namcs-- Reason;. 12.12.050 Changing street names -- Process. 151 (Rancho Cucamonga 1/82) 12.08.080 City standards. The city engineer is authorized to establish standards for the construction and installation of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving and storm drain structures. (Ord. 58 §8, 1979). 12.08.090 No encroachment without nernit. No building, structure or parking lot shall be erected, enlarged or altered if it does, or would, encroach upon any public easement or right -of -way unless an encroachment permit is first obtained from the city engineer. The city engineer may grant an encroachment permit if he determines that the encroachment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. (Ord. 58 §9, 1979). D Chauter 12.12 Sec ions: 12.1.2.010 llur oF prcv;s -c;;s. 12.12.020 Naming criteria. 12.12.030 Ncw streets. 12.12.04; Changing street namcs-- Reason;. 12.12.050 Changing street names -- Process. 151 (Rancho Cucamonga 1/82) 12.12.010 -- 12.12.020 12.12.010 Purpose of provisions. Street names me%, be changed ;ursuant to the following: A. That the Proposed chance is consistent with the coals; Policies and standards of the general clan; B. That the proposed chance is consistent with the adopted master l plan of streets and highways or adopted circu- ation element; C. That the proposed chance will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment; D. That the proposed change is deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. (Ord. 144 §5, 1981). 12.12.020 Namina criteria. Streets shall be named follows: as A. Street names should be pleasant sounding, appropriate, easy to read (so that the public, and children in particular, can handle the name in an emergency situation), and should add to the pr' -de of home ownership and community. B. The following types of street names are unacceptable: numerical names (1st, 2nd, etc.); alphabetical letters (A, B, C, etc.); frivolous, complicated or undesirable names; uncon- ventional spelling; compound names; given or surnames of persons living or dead (Pioneer families, historic persons, etc., excluded). C. Streets which are continuous shall be extended in accordance with the present street names wherever possible and Peas: hie. D. Discontinuous streets shall not be given the same name. E. Duplication of existing or proposed street names is prohibited. Similar sounding names are considered to be duplication, regardless of spelling. F. Existing areas Of the city shall = - rive to have new street names consistent with the prevailing t:�e me of north/ south streets named after gems and east /;vest streets named after trees when possible and where feasible. G. Streets with a ninety - degree or more change of direction shall change names at a convenient and appropriate point as determined by the ' city planner. H. That street designation for present and future street-- shall be as follows: I. Boulevard. Special east —.rest streets shall be named "2oulevards" 2. Streets. East -west streets to be named "Streets "; 3. Avenues. North -south streets to be Avenues" named 4. Road. Anv diaconal street which does not conform basically to crid to be known as "Roads "; 5. Drive. East -west streets parallel to but hetween , named streets, to be called „rives "; (Rancho Cucamonga 1/82) 152 rl0 W /L L� L;•w,w1. C�1�.7 •ZG ZrS `'VINEYARD `National `Bank p February 23, 1983 Jon D. Mikels Mayor Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mayor Mikels: I'am in the process of attempting to finalize and receive approval for a large addition to my residence which is located on Red Hill in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Thus far all members of the staff within the City have been very helpful and infact as of this date If I agree to one condition which I'am presently opposing then infact the plans will be approved and a building permit can be issued. I'am requesting that the City Council waive, Council Ordinance #58, which deals with offsite improvements where more than 640 sq.ft • are being added to an existing dwelling. In my particular case we are adding approximately 1792 sq.ft. which is a second story addition to our home, located at the end of Sierra Vista Drive. The street in itself, as are many on Red Hill, is of a rural nature and does not have curbs, gutters, sidewalks and so forth. What the City is asking me to do is make these improvements now or sign a statement to the fact that in the future, I will at my expense, make said improvements. If infact I make the improvements which are being requested we would be the only home on our street that had a curb or a gutter in front of it. 9 On December 10, 1980 the City Planner approved a project calling for the development of 4.42 acres of land (copy attached) which is to the South and East of my property. The project has never gone any further, however in discussing the plans with the surveyor at the time the original application was approved, it was explained to me that the developer of that land would be responsible for upgrading both Sierra Vista itself and meeting the requests for curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on all parcels adjacent thereof. P.0 BOX 727 • 8158 VINEYARD AVENUE • RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 • (71A) 9870177 Mayor Mikels 2 February 23, 1983 You will find enclosed various pictures of the front of my residence. The photos clearly indicate that there are no improvements to the street and infact the street itself is in great need of repair. I would appreciate you reviewing my request and if necessary taking it before the City Coucil and requesting a waiver of the condition. If you do not agree, I would like the opportunity to discuss it with you personally. Since this problem is holding up the issuance of our permit I would appreciate an early reply. Enclosures SRS:cc pq7. Ver , Truly Yours, +en en senbac President • I A. 0 0 0 D CITY OF RAKCI -10 CI;C \11OVGA STAFF REPORT Date: December 10, 1980 To: Planning Commission From: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner By: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner Subject: EN'fIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRAC N0. 11563 - RED HILL Pr'RT NE RS - A custom lot subdivision on 4 2 acres of land pnto 12 single family residential lots in the R -1 -12 zone, to deed on th e,eist and west sides of Sierra Vista, orth of Red 11 Country Club Drive - "tom 207- 082 -01 and 201- 411 -10 BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a residential subdivision of 4.42 acres of land into 12 lots. The project site is located on Sierra Vista Avenue, just north of Red Hill Country Club Drive (Exhibit "A "). The site is presently zoned R- 1- 12,000 thus permitting the development of single family residential dwellings on minimum 12,000 square foot lots. The site is presently vacant and undeveloped and contains mature trees throughout. The surrounding zoning and land use is of a single family residential charac- ter. The Interim General Plan designates this area as low density residential at 2 -5 dwelling units per acre and the proposed General Plan designates the project site as low density residential at 2 -4 dwelling units per acre. The project has been reviewed by the Growth Management Review Committee as a custom lot subdivision in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance, and has received the minimum threshold point limit, thus eligible for consideration of approval by the Planning Conmission. - ANALYSIS: The tentative map has been prepared in accordance with the State Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The lot sizes, widths, and depths are in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The size and shape o [ .c lots are adequate to accommodate the placement of a dwelling unit within the required set -bacx provisions. Access to the tract will be from the extension of Sierra Vista to Red Hill Country Clu;. Drive and a new cul -de -sac. Monte Vista Drive, which is adjacent to the east boundary line Of tli.e prefect S"a 'dill not be used as main access to the site but will be required to be improved in accordance with the City's standard alley design. No perimeter landscaped parkways will be created as a result of this subdivision. The only required landscaping for this subdivision will be street trees in accordance with the City's street tree policy. There are several existing trees located throughout the site of which will not be affected by the installa- tion of street improvements. It is recommended that these trees be retained and so designated on the final grading plan. ITEM "I" Environmental Assessmeil and Tentative Tract No. 11563 Page 2 • This development has been submitted as a custom lot subdivision and has therefore not submitted specific site plans or building designs. Shauld the developer decide to develop this subdivision as a tract, then sub- mission of required site plans and building designs will be required prior to issuance of building permits. Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, is attached for your review. The staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investigation and has found no significant adverse impacts upon the environment as a result of this project. It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for this project. CORRESPONDENCE: A Tentative Tract Nap was advertised as a public hearing item in The Daily Report newspaper. To date, no correspondence has been received for this project. RECO "MENOATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive public input. If, after such hearing, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, then 'he adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions would be appropriate. I ectful y s "fitted . HOGAf /'lann er BY,H:MV:nm Attachments: Exhibit "A ", Location Map Exhibit "B ", Tentative Tract Map Part I, Initial Study Resolution of Approval • d- 1 v • 0 no sca v lt� I ,\()IZTI I CITY OF ITI'N 11 --UAI �503- 1Z,VNCI 10 CUCAMONGA TIT11 PLANNING DIVISION �ql P 1 41, Y. 15 Is GRANNG a UUAGE 0.M TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11563 I,l IN TI.E CNI X NG111110 CUCAPAOIIG4 r;I 1,o 1— 'VIN. 1 41, Y. 15 Is GRANNG a UUAGE 0.M RESOLUTION NO. 80 -79 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11563. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11563, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Red Hill Partners, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 4.42 acres located on Sierra Vista, north of Red Hill Country Club Dr. and being divided into 12 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on December 10, 1980; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NO'.-I, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: • SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract Not 11563 and the Map thereof: 9 (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easemment acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. 80� %9 Page 2 `/ C (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11563, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planninq Division Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. for projects usino septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, .written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. • • 3. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical heights it and arc 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not he limited to rooted ground cover and apprcpH 3to shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation stall be — nntinucu;ly maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. y 300 Resolution No. 8079 Page 3 • 4. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating _ relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. S. This approval shall become null and void if the final subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 6. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 7. Existing trees are to be retained where street improvements do not occur. The final grading plan shall accurately indicate the location and that they are to be retained. 8. The slopes along the west property line of lots 9, 10, and 11 shall be eliminated in favor of a retaining wall. Engineering Division • 9. Dedication of right -of -way for Sierra Vista Drive, shall be 60 feet wide (30' each side of the centerline of the street) with 15 feet radius at property corners at the intersection of Sierra Vista Drive and Red Hill Country Club Drive. 10. The proposed storm drain shall be 24" minimum R.C.P. centered on 12' wide dedicated easements. 11. The applicant shall contact and make arrangements with adjacent property owners to dispose of the surplus land beyond 60' wide required right -of -way for the portion of Sierra Vista Drive from Red Hill Country Club Drive to the first lots of the tract. 12. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City En ^ineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract ;.rap. 13, rinal plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 1i. Fxi,tinrl City road requiring reconstruction, shall remain opon for traffic at all times with adequate detours durinn actual construction. A cash deposit shall be required to cover the cost of the grading and paving prior to recordation of the tract map• On completion of the grading and paving, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the cash deposit shall be refunded. ,; n i Resolution ,:o. 80 -79 Page Y 15. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and • disposal of surface drainage entering the property from.. adjacent areas. 16. Letters of acceptance from downstream property owners shall be required where runoff from the tract flows onto private properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEFIBER, 1980. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JChai BY: �' Richard OahlATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Cornmission 1, JACK LPN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and • regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Carrnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cormission held on the 10th day of December, 1980 by the following vote j to -wit: AYES: CC::MISSIONERS: Rempel, Tolstoy, King, Sceranka, Dahl NOES: CCM1IISSIONERS: None ABSENT: CC:4MI SSIONERS: None l CJ 0 • 49 OTTV nc D A Mrlln OF TO A 1T4nATO A STAFF REPORT Q , F- U DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION ON GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT -0 A - KANOKVECHAYANT - A request to amend the Lieneral Plan Lan se an from Medium Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 15.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester Avenue - APN 227- 091 -45. SUMMARY: The applicant has requested an amendment to the General Plan to increase the allowable density for approximately 15 acres located on the northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester Avenue. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of February 23, 1983, held a public hearing to consider such request and found that the request was not consistent with the current land use policies of the General Plan and therefore denied the amendment. Attached is the Planning Commission staff report which fully outlines the General Plan policies and goals which are applicable in this case. Also attached is a copy of the Commission Resolution listing the findings for denial and an excerpt of the Minutes for the meeting of February 23, 1983. The Planning Commission's decision to deny the request was based mainly on the fact that the increase in density would not provide the proper transition of residential density in this area as described in the General Plan Land Use Goals and Policies. The Planning Commission felt that the present designation of 4 -14 dwelling units per acre provided a proper transition from the lower density residential to the west to the higher density residential to the east. Other than the applicant, one other citizen spoke at the Planning Commission hearing indicating that he was opposed to the change since there was no immediate proposal for a project. � 6 7-r General Plan Amendment 83 -01 AAanokvechayant City Council Agenda April 6, 1983 Page 2 0 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial of this request based upon the findings contained within their Resolution. Resp'ctf ly sntxnitted, Rick G me City Tanner i RG:MV:jr Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report - February 23, 1983 Planning Commission Resolution 83 -24 Planning Commission Minutes - February 23, 1983 • • � 0 q A • ( Xr nn n x ATO=n OT TOLXTr n STAFF REPORT_. �j }iZ Z DATE: February 23, 1983 _ 7 I TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -OIA - KANOKVECHAYANT - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium Residential (4 -14 dwelling units /acre) to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units /acre) on approximately 15.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN 227 - 091 -45. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Reauested Action: To change the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject site from Medium density (4 -14 du /ac) to Medium -High density (14 -24 du /ac). B. Puroose: No specific purpose was reported by the applicant. C. Location: Northeast corner of Base Line and Rochester (Exhibit "A "). D. Size: 15.6 acres E. Existing Zoning: M -1 (Limited Manufacturing) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant, undeveloped G. Existing Surrounding North - lumber yard, zoned M -1 Land Use & Zoning South - single family homes, zoned R -1 East - vacant, zoned M -1 West - vacant, zoned Planned Community (Victoria) Z r) General Plan Amenc.nt 83- 01A /Kanokvechayant Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 2 • H. General Plan Project Site - Medium Residential Designations: (4 -14 du /ac) = North - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) West - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) 1. Site Characteristics: Generally a flat site sloping gently in a -southerly-direction; no structures; some low weeds and grasses; curb and gutter existing along Rochester. 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: The analysis of an amendment to the land use plan generally focuses upon surrounding land use compatibility, General Plan land use goals and policies and potential environmental impacts. As shown in Exhibit "A ", the subject property is 15.6 acres. However, this site is really part of a larger area which is • bounded on the north by Southern Pacific Railroad and on the east by Day Creek Wash. Any consideration of an amendment to the subject site should also include a review of this entire planning area which encompasses approximately 32 acres. This planning area is surrounded mainly by the planned communities of Victoria and Terra Vista. Exhibit "B" displays the land use designations of each planned community. Victoria designates a Low - Medium density (4 -8 du /ac) to the north and west. Terra Vista designates a Medium density (4 -14 du /ac) on the southwest corner of Rochester and Base Line. General Plan Land Use Goals & Policies: .The General Plan describes the Medium density category as providing a wide range of living accommodations ranging from conventional single family units to mobile homes and townhouses. Building at the lower end of the range is appropriate adjacent to low and very low residential areas. Development at the higher end of the range is more suitable along transit routes and major or secondary thoroughfares. The General Plan further states that the Medium density category is used to serve as a transition between low density areas to areas of higher density and areas of greater intensity which generate more traffic and noise. • 1 n General Plan Amendment 83- 01A /Kanokvechayant Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 • Page 3 During the development of the General Plan, this planning area was subject to much discussion. Originally, the area was designated as Low - Medium (4 -8 du /ac). After further analysis by the Commission and Council, it was decided that the Medium range (4 -14 du /ac) would be more suitable for this area, as it would provide a transition from the lower densities in the planned communities west of this area and the existing Rochester tract to the east toward the higher densities and increased intensity between Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Parkway. The General Plan chacterizes the Medium -High range for areas of major community facilities and employment opportunities. This planning area should provide a transition from lower intensity uses to higher intensity uses while at the same time allow for development at the higher end of the range as a result of its location on a major thoroughfare. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff completed the environmental checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of the amendment. • As always, increased densities as a result of development will incrementally add to such things as increased traffic and increased water runoff. However, these increases are not viewed as significant adverse impacts as these increases are within the capability of the projected street and flood control facilities. The increased density, if built at the highest density, would cause approximately 1,000 additional vehicle trips per day beyond the current General Plan level. Base Line will have an ultimate capacity of 43,000 trips per day and Rochester 22,000 trips per day. At the current land use levels, Base Line is currently projected to carry about 30,000 trips per day. Therefore, a 1,000 trip per day increase is not impacting the capability of the street system to handle the increased density. Therefore, if the Commission chooses to recommend approval of this amendment, it is recommended that issuance of a Negative Declaration be recommended to the City Council. II1. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Following are the findings req,rired to be made for approval of this amendment. A. The amendment does not conflict with the residential land use policies of the General Plan. ? r 0 9, o '� General Plan Amendment 83- OIA /Kanokvechayant Planning Commission Agenda February 23, 1983 Page 4 • B. The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Use Element. C. The amendment would not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment. D. The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to adjacent properties. This amendment would not be materially detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts as listed in "C" and "D" above. The Commission should examine and decide whether the amendment to a Medium -High density would promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan. IV. CORRESPONEONCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. V. RECONNENDAT ION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and receive all public input on this matter. If the • Commission finds that the requested amendment is consistent with General Plan goals and policies, a recommendation of approval to the City Council would be appropriate. If these findings cannot be met to the Commission's satisfaction, a recommendation of denial to the City Council would be appropriate. Res4ec Yf u l ly �Mbmi tted, r1anner Rick G z City P RG:MV: jr i Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Map Exhibit "B" - Planned Communty Designations Exhibit "C" - General Plan Designations Part I, Initial Study Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial 0 9, o '� • R RAPUMMiD MONTANA WIERA LRIM MIEDOMBff RM. MM =CI. MONEk CA &Qcl+�3i PPACM-1 MM 227—MI-45 EtD OF P.C. SUBJECT M- I '' Il j •PROPER VICTCRW 15.628 ACRES M- IVA., s,a: VF - C-�- f e�lx TEFRA V�ISTA• P V-300' I \N it l `° 111! i I (•a�yi may_ �•.f�. �. • f ��Y7 t le W i W. f 16 f X -71 M m L. MQF K AL. 6 =77 m /LM E Lv LM !I Ell M46 LM OP E AC m 4 . fi cr*1 'Op Ir ......... Ire l . Vi 7 Terra Vista Plan ON 111 -2 COL9AIINITY FLAN Victoria A;=dCCw8"� v a =" = Q n Figure III -1 0 LAND USE PLAN RESIDENTIAL L 1 VERY LOW 120UVAC I -1 LOW 2 4PU' :AC 7 LOW - MEDIUM .- sDui:fc 4. —.. -.3 MEDIUM a -w VU I AC C - -7 MEDIUM -HIGH 14 14 DUI AC E_::7 HIGH x- UUGU'.AC L) MASTER PLAN REQUIRED COMMERCIAL /OFFICE C'9 COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL !_• I NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. REGIONAL COMMERCIAL ....i OFFICE INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL PARK :�1 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/ RAIL SERVED G%O //17 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL L OPEN SPACE 1 FLOOD CONTROL/ UTILITY CORD. SPECIAL BOULEVARD PUBLIC FACILITIES IE—I EXISTING SCHOOLS • ^: PROPOSED SCHOOLS' I PARKS'IExisTHG PAwcs wows -cl I • i CIVIC COMMUNITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN 0 • `J l RESOLUTION NO. 83 -24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ,CALIFORNIA DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMEIDNEIT 83 -01A TO XIEND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LIME AND ROCHESTER, APPROXPM'ATELY 32 ACRES, FROM PIEOMM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4 -14 DU /AC) TO MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY (14 -24 DU /AC) l4HEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to consider said amendment; and ',NEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered both the pro and con issues of said amendment. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission denies General Plan Amendment 83 -01A based on the following findings: A. The amendment does not conform with the residential land use policies of the General Plan. B. The amendment does not promote the goals of the Land Use Element. APPRC' /ED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF FE3..RJARY, 1983. PL..IP,I1;C C ^'I'4MIC'l OF HE CITY OF RANCHO CU-aMONGA BY: �firy; Fjrng, Chpirman — 9 � y �r Secr xary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetinn of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of February, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: Co ?C4ISSIONERS: NOES: C11:'MISS1011ERS: ASSENT: CO'IMISSIONERS: MCNIF.L, BARKER, REI•IPEL, STOUT, KING NONE NONE 7 1 �. C C • Eycerpt from Planning Commission Minutes - February 23, 1983 i i• # a! I. ENVIRONAENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83 -01A - KA1:O ;VEJKAY A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from Medium Residential (4 -14 dwelling units /acre) to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units /acre) on approximately 15.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue - APN 227 - 091 -45. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of January 26, 1983). Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the report to the Commission. Chair:ran King opened the public hearing. Dr. Ra•eewan Kanokvechayant, applicant, addressed the Commission thanking the City staff for helping her prepare the application a General Plan amendment from Medium Residential to Medium -High Residential. She stated that this density only appears in the planned communities areas and that she had been contacted by a developer who was interested in her property, but the property did not carry a 'nigh enough density for her to sell it. Also, she did not feel that a problem would be created in this amendment. Dr. Kanokvechayant stated that she objected to a staff report statement that indicated that the entire 35 acres needed to be considered in the amendment of this property because her property is a different situation since her property is bounded by • two major streets, Base Line and Rochester, which could carry more traffic and this traf;'io would not affect the Rochester tract. Don Baer, Eti•wanda resident, addressed the Commission in opposition to the rezoning of this property. Mr. Baer stated that this property was the subject of lengthy debate during the General Plan hearings. Further, that he realized that densities would change and was not against change as long as there is a good plan; however, there doesn't seem to be a plan for this property as of now and that raising the density of the property without knowing what is going to be built there would be contrary to the planning the City has spent the last five years doing. Dr. Kanokvechayant addressed the Commission stating that she is not a developer or builder and cannot afford to bring a plan before the City. She further stated that she would make sure that a good plan for the property was submitted to the City. Also, that one plan she had been working on was similar to the project on Grove Avenue and 8th with a parking lot underneath; however, was not financially able to complete these plans. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Mc Niel stated that he is of the opinion that the density is at maximum now and it is out of reason to rezone it a higher density. Chairman Kin, nte✓ed that this; specific parcel of property was discussed at ienvth ut the General Plan hearings and that everyone basically felt that Day Creek was the more centrally located and more mass - transit oriented roadway and therefore the higher density should be placed along that major arterial. Further, that this piece of property has the highest density of any property � 11) c c west of Day Creek over to Haven north of Base Line and up to the Foothill • Freeway and the reason it has the present density is because of its location with regard to Base Line and Rochester. It was felt that this piece of property was a good piece of property to have this higher density or,. Further, to raise the density any higher would be against much of the discussion at the General Plan hearings and that good planning calls for the density that presently exists. Commissioner Rempel stated that the comment made by Mr. Baer is applicable in this case and that a plan really has to come first. There were no further comments and Chairman King called for the motion. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Barker, unanimously carried, to adopt Resolution 83 -24 to deny General Plan Amendment 83 -01A. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Mc Niel, Barker, Rempel, Stout, King NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: CO3^MISSIONERS: None -carried- • 0 • Is rrmv nc o n %Trvn OTTO n nenwrr e STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: City Council and -City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Alta Loma Park Restoration Status Report 1977 "J i Bids have been received for the final elements of the Alta Loma Park Renovation. This work includes hydro- seeding the entire park, and concrete curbing and drainage structures to protect the jagging track. As you can see from the attached memo, the project as currently structured exceeds the original estimate by a considerable amount. The reasons for the differences are spelled out in the Public Works Engineer's memo. To date, all grading operations have been completed and including storm damage restoration at an estimated cost of $34,000 including $5,000 for storm damage. Excluding the damage costs, the project can be structured to be completed within budget if curb, gutter and drainage work is eliminated, seeding is reduced to only the field area, contract maintenance periods are eliminated and some of the rock removal and preparation is done by the maintenance crew. If this is the desire of the Council, then all bids should be rejected and the project rebid in the reduced form. It would be Staff's recommendation to expand the project and complete the program as currently structured. This would require appropriation of an additional $36,000 from the Park Development fund and award of the contracts to Sunrise Landscape and J. H. Concrete as law bidders. RECOMMENDATON: It is recommended that Council award contracts to Sunrise Landscape for $21,000 and J. H. Concrete for $11,616.25 and appropriate a total of $76,000 from the Park Development fund to complete the Alta Loma Park Renovation Project. Respectfully submitted, LBH +a Attachment 318 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 29, 1983 T0: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer FROM: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Alta Lama Park Reconstruction Progress 4 Cii NN� F � ily 1977 I In spite of the recent down pours, Alta Loma Park reconstruction is still on schedule, provided the award of the turf planting occurs at the Council Meeting of April 6th. However, the low bid for turf planting is considerably higher than the original estimate. The higher cost is due to a considerable increase in the scope of work. Basically, the original estimate was for hydroseeding approximately 3.5 acres only (scalped areas). The specifications call for: 1. All rocks 3/4" and larger to be removed to a depth of 4" in soccer field areas. 2. Fine grading to eliminate all puddling (water test) 3. Valve boxes and track to be at grade. 4. Irrigation heads and gutters to be 3/4" above grade. 5. Hydroseeding the entire park (5.5 acres) 6. The contractor to be responsible for all irrigation work during contact period. 7. Fertilizers and binding agents. 8. All lawn areas to be germinated (reseeded if necessary) prior to plant establishment period. 9. A plant establishment period to be 30 days which requires watering 4 to 6 times daily (Mulch shall be kept damp not wet and not allowed to dry out). 10. A maintenance period beginning at end of establishment period which requires all maintenance including weeding, mowing, edging, sweeping walks, litter pick -up, correcting nutrient deficiencies, pest and disease control, reseeding, etc., etc., etc., until an even, close stand, healthy, mature turf is obtained but not less than 30 days. Other factors which have changed the scope of the other work also need to be addressed. The grading plan calls for curb and gutter and drain pipes to eliminate erosion which has occured in the past. Reoccuring erosion will have an adverse impact on the grading and turf investment. Also, it is preferable to use decomposed granite in the track areas as opposed to native material. The above two items were not included in the original estimate. Further, some regrading and imparting of top soil is required due to considerable erosion caused by recent rains. The regrading began this morning and will be completed by the end of this week. A summary of the original estimate, cost to date, and projected cost are provided below. 3�� 0 Comments Low Bid Completed (Equip. Rental) Completed•(Diff. Source) Est. Fenced north to south as as opposed to around fields Completed Estimate to stake C & G and drains Estimate Low Bid ALTA LOMA PARK RECONSTRUCTION SUMARY Original Estimate Exist. /Proposed Cost Turf & Placement 5,990.00 Turf placement, dressing, 21,000.00 Top Dressing 5,105.00 60 day maint. period, etc. IT, (19= Turf Removal 3,000.00 Turf removal & grading 25,367.68 R=_3rade Slopes 9,500.00 Top Soil 3,500.00 Top Soil 9,370.00 Regrading (Erosion) 5 000.00 22, 370ff 38 B68 Rental Fence 2,478.00 Rental Fence 458.00 J —% Engineer 5,000.00 Engineer 2,377.00 1 600.00 '3,9 00 D.G. 4,550.00 Curb & Gutter and Drains 11,676.25 TOTALS _P4 0,�0 5, .9 Amount Authorized $40,000.00 0 Comments Low Bid Completed (Equip. Rental) Completed•(Diff. Source) Est. Fenced north to south as as opposed to around fields Completed Estimate to stake C & G and drains Estimate Low Bid CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJ,CT: Alta Lnma Park Renovation, Concrete DATE: March 14, 1983 LOC41104: Alta Lana Park located on Beryl north of 19th Street CONTRACT NO. 41 -50 -02 J. H. Concrete D. Armond ITEMS QdANTmz5 61D W.1UNT BID AMOUNT 81D AMOUNT BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT BID MOUNT J A 1. P.C.C. Cerh ; Gutter 1165 L.F. 9.25 10,776.25 12.75 14,853.75 2. P.C.C. Head Uall 4 Each 150.00 6DO.00 500.00 2,000.00 3. 4G L.F. Placement 12" 7.50 300.00 4.00 460.00 ASS(PVC) Pipe TOTALS 11.676.25 17,013.75 • • • I I 4. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PRO,—LC' AI :3 Lona Park Renovation, Landscape LOCA.'ION: Alta Lana Park located on Beryl north of 19th Street Sunrise Laodscp. Plant Control Lore. Nature -Gro Corp. ITEn5 QUANTITIES BID MOUNT BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT J 1. Ny irpseei mq Incladin9 Fore G -aJ,n9 5.5 Atres 3,818.18 21,000.00 4,835.4D 26. 600.254,063.63 22,349.97 TOTALS $21,000.00 $26,600.25 $22,349.97 GATE: March 14, 1983 CONTRACT NO. 41 -50 -02 BID MOUNT BID MOUNT BID MOUNT 0 r7. LI ® CITY OF RANCHO CUCQIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 6, 1982 TO: City Council and- City Manager FRO:;: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Alta Loma Park Renovation �. %w .l C Purpose: In recent weeks with the beginning of soccer season, several concerns have been raised about the condition of the playing fields at Alta Loma Park. Eased on this input, the Staff has prepared this report to explore options for improving the park to meet the expressed concerns. Bac'arourhl,: The Alta Loma Park was constructed prior to incorporation with funds provided by the Economic Development Administration (EDA) as a part cf President Carter's Public Works Employment Act. These funds came with extremely tight time constraints and forced many agencies to hastily develop plans for facilities to take advantage of the funds. Because the park was hastily conceived and designed, certain mainte- nance problems were developed into the park which have mani=ested themselves in recent years. These problems fall into two broad categories: • Grading and Drainage • Turf Gradina The park was designed with an engineered look that incorporates flat pads sharp (2:1) slope bank and rock filled drainage swales. The slope bank and rock Swale is not amenable to mowing and requires significant manpower commitments to keep weeded and dressed. 'Pile park should be regraded to remove steep slopes, to fill rock drainage swales and to collect drainage in more gentle turf swales on the sout::ern perimeter of the park. These actions will remove the rock nuivance, eliminate much of the hand maintenance demand and mak,, the p,irk mczu usable. ''.• parr: to f is a fescue mi :aure, a touch, commonly used park turf • CITY COU::CIL STAFF rPORT Alta Loma Park RencWion October 6, 1982 Pace 2 but has the characteristic of being very clumpy and as a result, cannot be mowed very low and kept in the kind of fine consistent surface for sports activities such as soccer. Furthermore, when areas are eroded from use, greater time is necessary for recovery of the turf between uses. The existence of very little top soil beneath the turf further exacerbates the problem. When the native soil, which is rocky by nature, is exposed, any activity brings rocks to the surface which in turn are scattered about the field. The fields were reseeded about two years ago. While it did not create the ideal solution, the surface was improved considerably for the following year. Unfortunately, the fields suffered a major set - back this summer due to a new water main installation which increased pressure at the park and caused frequent failure of the systems back- flow preve.n.ticn valve. This occurred during one of the hottest periods of the summer and portions of the field where heavy use takes place went into permanent wilt due to lack of water. Althcuch this problem has been corrected, there was insufficient time between this occurrence and the beginning of this soccer season for the field to recover. The -more desirable turf for a finer playing field is the • Hybrid Bermuda. This turf can be mowed at a lower height and has a quicker recovery period. Al`ernat tihile the present condition of the fields can be enhanced through reseeding, the fine consistent surface recuired by certain sports activities cannot be achieved without some modification of the field characteristics. The renovation alternatives range from complete field reconstruction to minimal renovation. These options range in cost from $3,000 to $55,000. Five options have been identified and are detailed in the attached charts and summarized below: OPTION 1: Fescue Mixture Overseed - This is the minimal treatment winch would be similar to previous actions and would im- prove thn2 surface for a year b^ would require _frequent rocurrencn. This truatmen.t we'ul.i not likely result in an improved playing surface. No Gradin) chances. Estimated cost: $5,611. - •CPT.: 2: Common Rnr ^,u,la rvrrseed - This process would booin to cnan , he :i, i;',ti turf: hut would take many years to fully translt nn. The results would _ventually be a more acccntable playinq stir.. No Gradin, chances. estimated cost: $8,061. !(D _iI r7 S F1 1 CITY COC::CIL S :�^ REPORT Alta Loma Park• F Pen�tion October 6, 1982 Pace 3 0 •. • OPTION 3: Common Bermuda By Seed - Recradina - This option would accelerate the conversion to a superior playing surface but would require six months closure of the par', and additional expense. Regrading is proposed concurrently. Cost Estimate: $40,943. OPTION 4: Nybr id Bermu By Stolons - Recradinq - This option wouia make use da of hybrid Stolons (seed stalks) in place of seeds. The stolons will establish more quiokly with a stronger mat. Regrading is proposed. Cost Estimate: $46,095. OPTION 5: 11vbr;d Bermuda By Sod - Regrading - This option would replace turf through Boding. It would be the quickest establishment with the minimal down time (two months) I or the park. Regrading is proposed. Cost Estimate: $54,390. Im•olementaticn The proposed project should be redesigned by a park consultant and reconstruction contracted in early January. The Park field would be closed for use from January to August to allow for turf establishment. Future Park Maintenance and Operation The Proposed project would result in a superior park athletic field, howc':cr, would still reqaire additional maintenance commitments to insure the continued health of the field. The .Hybrid Bcrmuca crass - cc•airss closer mcding than the _escue mix and the City will be ra,.Tuiredl to purchase a reel ';p -2 ganc, mower to properly groom the field. This mower would cost from $12,000 to $10,000 but would have the side hencfit of i..__~_.sing maintenance It is rgcommgnded that the Tcwor acquisition he studied Curth ^_r and .. ,enr'� _cnsi l,.:-a P.n nlavj:,.:: :401d t!.-,- recci':es int^nsiv c3e must be given Periodic relioc from dot-' ity to allow time for recovery. This relief has no% been providod in the past and must be more carefully considered in Lho fu'-are. This factor will result in periodic field closure and rot.ition schadule. These recovery periods can likely be scheduled arounu o mi7or activities such as soccer and "T" ball but will puLl thy: : :wld out of use in the off peak periods. • //r 71 `P� • CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT • Alta Loma Park Ren< (6 tion October 6, 1982 Page 4 Future Park Two additional facts should be pointed out to the Council. First, funds expended on extensive renovation could be used to develop additional narks to provide relief and, second, Staff will likely be looking at addtional park improvements in the coming year such as tree planting, play equipment installation and curbing of sand pit areas. These additional items fall outside the immediate con- cerns, but do relate to overall long term park improvement and development. RECO:?ucND AT I ON It is recommended that the Council: 1. Approve Alta Loma Park renovation Option 4 at a budget of $50,000 to be drawn from the park development funds. 2. Direct Staff to study lawn mower acquisition options for presenta- tion with the 1983 -84 Fiscal Budget. • 3, That the plan be im,clemented during a park closure between January and August of 1983. f 4. Direct Staff to prepare a park operations plan to insure optimum life of the improved park facility. Respectfully / submitted, LB11: ja Attachments • 2? 3 0 El F1 E L ALTA LOMA PARK RENOVATION COST SUMMARY OF OPTIONS Hybrid Hybrid Common Bermuda Bermuda Bermuda By Sod By Stolons By Seed Common Fescue • Bermuda Mixture Over Seed Ove ^.Seed Turf and Placement $38,890.00- $11,142.00 $ 5,990.00 $ 5,9 90.00 S 6,5=0.00 Regrade slopes and drainage swales $ 9,500.0 $ 9,500.00 $ 9,500,00 relocate irrigation and replant Remove existing turf $ 3,000.0 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Import too soil and placement $ 9,870.00 $ 9,870.00 Top dressing and placement $ 5,105.00 $ 5,105.00 $ 2,071.00 S 2,071.00 (60 C.Y.) (60 C.Y.) Fence rental (uo to one year) I S 2,478.00 S 2,478.00 i Design engineer and set grades $ 5,000.0 S 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 TOTAL 554,390.0 S46,095.00 $40,943.00, S 8,061.00 $ 8,611.0011 11111, q • • ALTA. LOMA PARK RENOVATION OPTIONS ANALYSIS- DETAIL LOST ESTIMATES x 2 A. TURF OPTIONS I. Hybrid Bermuda by Sod 152,460 s.f. @ $,185 = $28,200.00 Placement 152.460 s.f. @ $.057 = S 8.69o.00 $3— 0'9000 2. Hybrid Bermuda by Stolen$ 765 bushels @ $4.60 = $ 3,519.00 P!accr:ent 152,460 s.f. @ $.05 = 5 7,623.00 511,142.00 3• Co.-,-on Bermuda by Seed . 230 Its. @ 52.15 = $ 500.00 Plac ^-ent 152,60. s.f. ; 5.036 = 5 5.49n,c0 5 5,7.`0.00 4. Fescue by Seed 1500 lbs. ? $7.50 = $ 11050.00 Placement 152,460. s.f, @ $.036 = $ 5.490.00 S 5'1J.uO B. SU?POPT s101..K (GRACING. `.OIL PRE TOP SOIL rTC 1. Rc;radinq drainage ditches: fill in rock fI0w Ilnes ind cut back 2:1 3101c= to provic, mo r.. Bantle 5100-1 and drainnn- 5".11, 5 2,5,0.00 Exis[i.i; irri gat1 on re 1,,ca tor. as ... "d (extent of rr0rk needed un6nnnn " thi, timu) S 2,000.00 : ,rt di,turla•d area, 150.0" S.I. $.05 S 5,00n.P0 5 y.500.J0 •. ,• °01,' uxi:tirtq turf S 3.000.00 x 2 E J 0 3. ]moor, top soil 1410 cy 9 $7.00 $ 9,870.00 Placement $ 1.000.00 $10,770-00 4. Top Dressing 230 cy : $17.85 $ 4,105.00 Placement $ 1,000.00 $ 5,105.00 5. Fence Rental 2400 I.f. G $.97 $ 2,328.00 2 gates [s $.75 150.00 $ 2— 47 00 6. Design engineering surveys (not based on proposals) $ 5,000.00 • E • E i l n A w,nvn nt,n A wXnw,n A STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: City Council- and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Gr y 2 � n M O;; x 1977 SUBJECT: Disaster Repair Alternatives for Hellman Avenue and Hermosa Avenue Attached for Council review is the consultant's report on options for the improvement of Hellman Avenue from San Bernardino Road to the Pacific Electric tracks and Hermosa Avenue south of 19th Street. Several options are presented for your review. It is Staff's opinion after reviewing the alternatives that only two options would be viable for Hellman and one on Hermosa. HELLMAN AVENUE With the programmed improvement of the intersection of Hellman Avenue at Foothill Blvd. prior to the storm, Staff had become concerned about the bottleneck area just north of San Bernardino Road. This area will not likely be widened by development and imrovement with the intersection project would seem appropriate. With the additional storm damage, the opportunity exists to remove all bottlenecks and complete improvement of the street. The first option would be total reconstruction and widening south of the Pacific Electric tracks which is estimated at $260,000 to $300,000 with a $15,900 design fee. Because all other options are only partial solutions, we would recommend minimal restoration of damaged improvements with addi- tion of splash walls. Estimated at between $40,000 and $45,000. HERMOSA AVENUE The major question at this location is treatment of the State Highway portion of the intersection. Whereas this is a CalTrans' responsibility, it is recommended that minimal resurfacing and repair be completed on the City portion and cooperative efforts with CalTrans be pursued for the intersection. 2 0.11 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Disaster Repair Alternatives for Hellman Avenue and Hermosa Avenue April 6, 1983 Page 2 BERYL - HELLMAN STORM DRAIN The most important element in the improvement of Hellman Avnue is the completion of the Beryl- Hellman Storm Drain. This project is currently under design and could be accelerated for construction this summer if funds could be made available. The Storm Drain Fund is depleted at this time and will not be_, capable of funding summer construction. It would, however, be possible to carry the project with Systems Funds to be repaid as drainage funds are collected during the year. The estimated cast of the needed reach of the drain is $400,000. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve a full development program for Hellman Avenue scheduled for the earliest possible construc- tion. The program would combine reconstruction of Hellman with the Foothill and Hellman intersection project and construct Phase 1 of the Beryl- Hellman Storm Drain through a loan of Systems Development funds to the Drainage Fee fund. Estimated project budget $1,100,000. Respectfully submitted, i LBH4aa Attachments 3 a.� • r1 LJ • March 30, 1983 • PRELIMINARY STUDY PROJECT 3 He117an Avenue between San Bernardino Road and Palo Alto Street Project 3 has been divided into two projects to provide a format for rec=ondations and construction cost analyses: Proiect 3 -A: San Bernardino Road and 100!' north of Birch Street Project 3 -B: IOOt' north of Birch Street to the Southern Pacific Railroad, north of Palo Alto Street Proiect 3•.A Description Proiect 3 -A generally consists of widening Hellman .Avenue from 24' and 3:' to 44' curb to curb and constructing curb and gutter, • sidewalk and curb deflectors at downstream side of driveway cuts and street intersections. 'here arc three potential locations for widening: I.uca2'on A: San Bernardino Road to 380' north on east side (380 LF) frontage consists of nlayground area and undeveloped northeast corner (Sweeten Hall), exi=ting half -width right -of -way is 30'. Location B: San Bernardino Road to 670' north on west side (670 LF'' frontage consists of existing residence on northwest corner. House is approximately 35' from. existing 18" vertical curb, existing half -width right -of -way is 30' and 331. Sidewaik could be deleted in this area. Widening at these two locations will increase the curb to curb width from 34' to 4•1'. Location C: North side of Tryon Street to 100' north of Birch Street (630 Lc) frontage consists of a single resi- dence setback toot, from the street with the remainder of the frontage undeveloped. Curb to curb widening from 34' to 44', existing 1•.alf -width right -of -way is 30'. Page 1 of 6 7 D ) The existing asphalt concrete pavement does not show reflective • cracking and appears to be in good condition, including that area overlaying the existing 24' concrete pavement, excepting at the flowline adjacent to the existing 18" vertical curb which is eroded 6" to 8" wide down to the underlaying concrete pavement. Observations Restrictions in the curb to curb width proceeding downstream from a widened 44' section to a 34' and 24' section cause storm flows to be constricted, increasing velocity and the potential for flows to jump the curb eroding the parkway and flooding private property. Future storm damage behind the curb could be greatly reduced by constructing 12" curb deflectors on the downstream side of street intersections and driveway cuts. Hellman Avenue south of San Bernardino Road has been designed for widening, including improvements to the intersection with Foothill Boulevard. In order to be consistent with this project and to improve the intersection, safety, traffic and drainage character- istics at San Bernardino Road, it is recommended that both sides of Hellman Avenue be widened with 12" curb and gutter with sidewalk adjacent to the curb and a 12" high splash wall adjacent to the back of sidewalk at Locations A and B, including curb and gutter on the north side of San Bernardino Road between Mortara Avenue and Hellmalo Avenuc. Existing right -of -way on Hellman Avenue on the west side is 30' and 33' and on the east is 30', both of which would accommodate the proposed improvements. These locations are fronted by an existing residence on the west side and playground and undeveloped corner lot on the east side. Future street improvements adjacent to these lots as a City condition of approval for private develop- ment plans will probably not occur in the foreseeable future. However, this does not appear to be the case for Location C, widening of which could safely be delaved until property is developed. The existing trans=ition upstream at Location C where the curb to curb widths narrow from 44' to 34' should be reinforced with a 12" to 18" high deflector wall to channelize storm flows in the street, minimizing erosion behind the existing 18" vertical curb and flooding of private property. Recommendations 1) Widen Hellman Avenue to 44' curb to curb with 12" curb and gutter, sidewalk adjacent to curb, 12" high splash wall adjacent to back o both cast and west sides, Locations A and B. • 3.�DPage 2 of 6 0 • 21 Curb and gutter north side San Bernardino Road between Hellman Avenue and Mortara Avenue and place AC overlay on adjacent Shoulder area. 3) Construct concrete cros_=- gutters at Hellman Avenue and San Bernardino Road intersection. 4) Repair eroded AC pavement in gutter flowline along existing is" vertical curb, Location C. s) Construct 18" high deflector wall at north end of Location C. 6) Overlay existing asphalt pavement from 100' south of Birch Stroot to 100' north (=Storm damaged pavement recently repaired by Cite). ?) Construct 1," curb deflectors on the downstream side of street intersection and driveway cuts. Estimated Construction Cost with 15; Contingency = S50,165 Proiect 3 -B • ➢CSCrint :on Project s -B ger.e'rally consists of replacement of existing pavemo:nc that has failed and constructing miscellaneous splash walls and. curb deflectors. Observations T1•,e pavement between 100' north of Birch Street and north side of Church Street shows evidence of reflective cracking over the Z4' Wide concrete pavement. The 10' asphalt widening on the east side of the street is in good condition. Portions of the existing asphalt and concrete pavement, 34 wide, between the north side of Church Street and 1n0' south of Palo Alto Street, which is Cucamonga Junior Hi;-h School frontage, has been severely d;anaged during the recent storm. Storm flows in the street uplifted the existing asphalt overlaying the concrete pavement approximately SSO 1.F. This pavement has since been temporarily repaired to allow the street to be opened to traffic. The pavement north and south of the school frontage is in relatively Coed cerxiition, however the pavement in front of the school, in- c1•,idin;; the lo' widening on the east side tl•.nt was apparently con- struc:ed when the school was constructed, also shows evidence of extend• :. reflective cracking. Reflective cracks in the asphalt Page 3 of 6 overlay resulting from the transverse of cracks in the existing • concrete pavement have worked up through the asphalt overlay and have projected into the 10' widened portion of the pavement adja- cent to the easterly curb. These transverse cracks coupled with a continuous longitudinal =crack at the joint line 10' off the curb and extensive erosion of the asphalt adiacent to the concrete gutter are factors contributing to the ultimate failure of the pavement by providing openingsfor water to get under the pavement. It seems a'uite probable that there are other areas where the sub - grade has been affected by storm water creating voids between the subgrade and the pavement that are not evident at the present time that could cause future pavement failures. It is also evident that the pavement between Church Street and 100' south of Palo Alto Street is showing much more failure and pavement stress than those areas on either side, which may be a result of poor quality control or construction techniques when the original 10' widening was con- structed. The bond between the underlaying concrete pavement and asphalt overlay failed allowing the asphalt overlay to be uplifted. Reflective cracks in the asphalt pavement allows water to infil- trate the subgrade and the bonding surface between the asphalt and concrete creating a weakened area. The surface between the concrete pavement, which was worn smooth as a result of traffic prior to the asphalt overlay, does not provide a good bonding surface. A pos- sible solution to insure a good bond would be to grind the surface of the exposed concrete,1/8" to 1/4" deep grooves, thereby providinge a roughened surface much more suitable to providing a good bonding surface. This coupled with a layer of petromat to prevent_ the existing reflective cracks in the pavement from working through the new asphalt overlay surface would provide pavement with many years of service life. Also, along the school frontage there has been erosion behind the sidewalk, including a 40' x 5' area where the concrete paved parkway has been undermined and setae miscellaneous curb sections. The area 100' south of Palo Alto Street to the Southern Pacific Railroad shows reflective cracking over the 24' wide asphalt and concrete pavement and the 10' widened pavement adjacent to the easterly curb shows some wear. However, the pavement foundation for the 34' wide pavement appears to be sound. Recommendations 1) Install petromat over the existing 24' asphalt pavement with a 2 asphalt overlay between 100' north of Birch Street to north side of Church Street matching the existing 10' widening on the east side. 2) Install petromat over the existing 34' pavement, grinding existing asphalt at the gutter and constructing a 2" asphalt • Page 4 of b 9 '.). --) • overlay between north of Church Street to southerly entrance to Cucamonga Junior High School parking lot. 9 3) Grind the existing exposed concrete pavement surface for texture 24' wide, place asphalt base leveling course, grind existing asphalt along concrete gutter, and install petremat i,ith 2" asphalt overlay from the southerly driveway for the Cucamonga Junior High School parking lot to approx- imately SSW north. 4) From a point SSO:�' north of the southerly driveway into the Cucamonga Junior High School parking lot to the Southern Pacific Railroad, grind existing asphalt adjacent to concrete gutter on the east side, and install petromat with a 2" asphalt overlay 34' wide. 5) Construct a 12" splash wall behind the existing sidewalk along portions of the Cucamonga Junior High School frontage in areas where existing parking lot pavement does not extend to back of sidewalk. 6) Renair approximately 200 square feet of concrete parkway pave- ment at one location along school frontage and miscellaneous curb. 7) Construct curb deflectors at downstream side of driveway cuts_ and street intersection at locations where there are conven- tional curb and gutter. These are not necessary where there exists 15" high vertical curb. Estimated Construction Cost with 15% Contingency OR Ali ni;n al r ^pair only of storm dam.a :ed pavement, our and parkway between Church Street and 100' south 0 11210 U to Street. 1) Items 3, 4, S, 6 and 7 above. 2) Grind e :tfisting as:)h alt sheiader adi ace,,- to the existing curb and ;utter, install petromat 10' wide between Church Street and 1;'V south of Palo Alto Street. Gstinatfd Construction Cost with 15 Contingency Page 5 of 6 Projects 3 -A B 3 -B (combined) • Combine Projects 3 -.4 and 3 -B considering removal of all existing concrete pavement 24' wide, and replacing with asphalt concrete over aggregate base, widening from 24' and 34' to 44' with curb and gutter and sidewalks between San Bernardino Road and Birch Street, and constructing splash walls and curb deflectors through- out the project. Estimated Construction Cost with 151 Contingency = $262,030 • • 1 2 Page 6 of 6 • • yio 7.e YcnJ, AEON G Engineer's Estivate Sur ary Sheet TNme o: Estirate �.F •c! /i�in /fti ✓ C'Gn. /c -";= _ "= !.ronosal or Alternate- Project Reverence Draciro Nos: Date: E Stiflated /-'G. N Date: .3 i9'G;' ?° Checked by: Dace: Dy: Reviewed by:_P_ ,." Date: Descri ion pt Pg. Re: Quantity Qa sc Total _-<' %C.N'M.VT GIiE.C'G":E< *ct SY GT C'O / ✓.� °37'v'. TEFL EL G.G � L In 9G ✓G i G G-n �-^. ✓t'. /Z "tP[_ �. /.e LF /G?O 7 ° —O 7Z /4P �c..JS7. PCB C.4c 5S rndTi EE S.F smFo /N�v 7,eYo N, JEC7 E.ginee:'_ --s:4=ate S=a, sheet • Tvne of Esciaate !,P <R'I ^.�/S' —:cc /c .—ic�,J = :oposa'_ o: Alternate Project T G /,yCJ — /J /.T / /�st TE /i'^FPG ✓= /'?:ia /7< /✓J/Yn A• lG EX151 —� Reference D :a.ings Nos: Date: Esti,ted 'oy ^>; L./,/ Date: Cbec'uec by: Date: Reviewe< bp: �.'•; / -r /; r Date: �/; i � 2 Description pg. Re`_. Quancity Unit Cos: Total ^i✓ST;'�/Ci' —O'ic2 ./. FF/<Ei« _� .;r r N� -o '/s =r /S i..r / < -.. :' C r,lE,el�1• c S✓ E7C ,650 >/S 2 Z7 r •ST. � //_'B F c J--rc� GF / ,rj / {O /Z, s ?S EGO/iJE g LE FI / G4J /GJ:JD. �G-O /L: o:IL % ✓.=%�G % SP.I'.e - v /<ECc.vcT, CX /sv r-'- rviY,... I %RaJEC7 22 %/'7fu' /MUr7) . EnEineer's Sscira.e Su=arc Sheet • • T'Yne n.° ZSC L2te = o ?eSai OC nl'.eZR2tE PC Ra:erence Dra+:incs Nos: Date: 2sti'ted by .�, /-/ Date: Checked 'oc: Date: Reviewed bv+ Date: Description Re` I Quantity Cost Total `q1 �GN37 .G i7C OVE�uY ro'v / /o= SY %"J 7 I- S^.� ✓G7. ".-._ /CRS ?�CU2 ECTc,2 =s G m X00 ?G.:O <�.• _ - - N_ /. F�✓T �Y 2.556 'S-- _. °o_S Imo_ 1�= ___.!�G�/J c �� ✓6i7Ei. /7 /� " s 37s /-'-° .SG. c r SV2707� L r -- �GN57 G ✓ : / � . = /!_✓ f /S% 1%� 540 L I L f!iRG/ -j lU Fi4L0 ALTU �G• ✓�.2Gi1'i •� "�T /O SAC. C: < PGG F ✓naN %. Engineer's Estitate Sumary Sheet • Type of Est irate` + roposal or Alternate Project c 57/'JCia 7 'SAC U cr!. Reference Drawings Nos: Date: Esti=ted by: G•1.. .~!• Da[e:_ =-��6�� Checked by: Date: Reviewed by: I'`i /;, •iS Date: Description. Pg. Ref. Quantity unit Cost Total Y D F5 ✓L��T^ ✓% i wiz' _ %COG G /06 L•/ SF ZCO �' _ �i00 i- 'O^•. /.Si /2 �.5FG i' -t /h /A L.G. LF ?0.7 %� G/Q L� c/ 72 -r — 7-AG r j� j 71 I 1 U E 9 .= i• °e.-/ %a S.R/Z..�'. -CvE•e L,.y e`N :rr�.= .�G'S� Engineer's Estivate Summary Sheet Type of Est irate / ✓_ %k'��= �/C,-/ Pro?osal or Alternate Re`e.rence Drawings Kos: Date: Esticated 'by: �•,�: r%I• Date: 411 E? Checked by: Date: Reviewed by: _2 F -ii'•% Date: G, j r Descri ?Lion Ref, Quantity Q L'nit Cost Total '..• ^- ✓E'%A ✓OI 01 —' /,• cy: U/./.< PGG F.a ✓E ✓Ji S/ /lrG -- ¢°� .52iiO .2 —c< � - "c. � � -..-52 G•F �co GAO I moo 'y0 g GDO 770 -,,4 �G �,sti L G.Cn /i7RJ'iv0 i :: � ?.4.-i ' fc' /'1CVE ��'ECO J.� i. �X /:T /�✓Mi . � ✓io EN E� tom/ 6Gtvw ,G�i/2cr/ Engineer's Escirate Summary Sheet Description li "" / •' " / - /'� Proposal or Alternate Type of Est irate / ice/ �G.�.'CZ�nrL ✓r ^i /= ':db .G2fgE G� c Project A/✓ // C 7 T J ��- ... "- - "L 7-� /�` /�/:•.: /� /'"cJ ✓i'r Date: Reference Drawings Nos: Z- 00 Dace: %33 Checked b}•: Date: Esticated b}•: -ZA,c 375 Reviewed by: D/. %•i % - /Date: • -?i__ / �_ Description pg. Ref . Quantity I!nit Cost Total �G.�.'CZ�nrL ✓r ^i /= ':db .G2fgE G� c ��tiv Z- 00 375 •• :� c/G ;°GG Devi/ .K 7'= 41 QUO O j L �� n March 50, 1985 • PRELIMINARY STUDY 0 PROJECT 2, LOCATION 7 Hermosa Avenue between 150' south of Mignonette Street to 50' north of Highland .Avenue Observations The existing street width south of Highland Avenue is 40' curb to curb with full development on the west side, and the easterly side is undeveloped with an 18" high vertical curb. Approxirately 16' wide by 200' of asphalt pavement adjacent to the west curb and 24' wide by 100' of concrete pavement with asphalt overlay adjacent to the east curb were damaged in the recent storm, however these areas have since been repaired by the placement of an asphalt leveling course. The intersection is in tact, however it is badly rutted by water and traffic. Nuisance water flows across this intersection on a continuous basis. The pavement in the inter- section is concrete overlaid with asphalt and there is extensive reflective cracking which allows water to infiltrate into the sub - grade and the bond between the asphalt and concrete pavement. This continuous wetting combined with continuous traffic and occas- sional storm flows cause routine failure of the pavement and con- tinuous maintenance of the intersection. Recommendations 1) Work with Caltrans on an agreeable solution to repair and up- grade the intersection, which may include: a) Construction of a low -flow pipe across the intersection to intercept nuisance flows (Caltrans already has approval and funds to construct this facility); and b) Removal of the existing pavement and reconstructing the intersection with concrete Pavement similar to that con- structed at Baseline Avenue and Hermosa Avenue; a Rcconstruction of the intersection with asphalt concrete. Estimated cost S20,n00 page 1 of 2 2) Construct 2" asphalt overlay and install petromat 40' wide • over existing pavement south of Highland Avenue. Estimated Construction Cost with 15% Contingency = 542,3S5 or Remove existing concrete pavement 24' wide and construct asphalt over aggregate base south of Highland Avenue, Estimated Construction Cost with 15% Contingency = $54,445 • Page 2 of 2 • Engineer's Rsti:ate Su_.zry Sheet • • Type of Est iczte RF/ n /�,Q/ �i�iy�_ 'JG ' /U'�pro7osal or dlcernata _ project iJ �f2 /.•"' ^� �'!t '� /� /�i�'� / /J�� —,f�.� �'��:/E := ��C'c:i /.�7 Reference Dravinss Nos: Date: Estimated by: 1 n Date: Cis %.t w Checked by: Dace: Reviewed 6c :!/i /'�yi >' Description Pg. Re` Quanta Cos', Unit Total S e7 r J 72FOe- Z. > 714 Engineer's Estivate Su,,,. -y Sheet • Type Of Asti —.ate 7,- �'�%r/ 9rOIIS21 or Alternate Reference Dra --ngs Ncs: Date: Esti:ated 'by: Checked by: Date: Reviewed by: Date: Description p'' Ref. Quantity Unit Cost Total _BOBS c- C Cv'E � `vE 6° ion G%U L-,-,4f 7 "'A C O✓F�- c..n C -/�Gi✓ 7 3` 5 .r - -A 2BS March 30, 1983 • DESIGN COST SUDPI4P.Y 1) Project 3 -A: Hellman Avenue Widen two locations, no improvements to exis=ting pavement, cemhine plans and specifications with recently completed Peothill /Hellman Project, San Bernardino Road to 100' north of Birch Street. Design,including Design Survey = S 4,200.00 2) Project 3 -A: Hellman Avenue Widen three locations, no improvements to existing pavement, combine plans and specifications with recently completed Foothill /Hellman Project, San Bernardino Road to 100' north of Birch Street. Desian,including Design Survey = $ 5,900.00 3) Project 3 -B: Hellman Avenue • install petromat and overlay existing pavement between 100' nor'.h of'Birch Street to Southern Pacific Railroad, including final PS 6 E. • Decign.,including Design Survey = S 7,600.00 4) Project 3 -B: Hellman Avenue -- Remove existing concrete pavement and reconstruct with asphalt over aggregate base between100' north of Birch Street to Southern Pacific Railroad, including final PS &E. Design,including Design Survey = $8,600.00 5) Project 3 -B: Hellman Avenue Repair 600± LF storm damaged pavement between Church Street and 100' south of Palo Alto Street, including the lo' shoulder area within project limits, including final PS $ E. De=ign, no Design Survey = S 3,000.00 Page 1 of 2 6) Projects 3 -A $ 3 -B (combined): Hellman Avenue • Remove existing PCC pavement and reconstruct with asphalt' over aggregate base, widen three locations, and construct splash walls and curb deflectors between San Bernardino Road and Southern Pacific Railroad, including final PS& E. Design and Design Survey = $ 15,300.00 7) Project 2, Location 7: Hermosa Avenue Coordinate with Caltrans on intersection improvements, removal Of existing concrete pavement or construct AC overlay over petromat from 150, south of Mignonette Street to 50 ±' north of Highland Avenue, including final PS 6 E. Design, including Design Survey = $ 5,900.00 • E Page 2 of 2 ��b — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �° FDATE: pril 6, 1983 embers of the City Council and City Manager . FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF A CITY FINANCIAL PLAN INTRODUCTION: During informal discussion with a small Building Industry Association BIA) task force, attention was focused upon the development of a City financial plan. The financial plan proposed by the task force would: 1. Forecast revenue 2. Identify revenue short falls 3. Identify alternatives for financing public facilities 4. Establish a financial program /strategy to provide most effective leverage of capital expenditure dollars The City has currently budgeted as part of its redevelopment budget • $15,000 for the purpose of developing a financial plan. However, as this report will discuss, the scope of work of such a plan has now evolved to an extent that the cost will be expended well beyond this budgeted amount. BACKGROUND: The City is moving from its initial planning stage to an implementation stage. Therefore, financial planning is necessary to identify when and what types of financing programs there are and how they can be implemented. All these programs will need to be in place before development activity forecloses any or all of these options. It is acknowledged by City staff and the BIA that during the months ahead the most critical planning need is a sound financial plan. It is also acknowleged that during the next two years development activity will be quite active. Timing is therefore important. The difference becomes that of scope - a short -term Capital Improvement Program (CIP) plan, or a longer -term comprehensive financing plan. The original concept of the Redevelopment Agency financial plan was intended to address only the City's 5 -year Capital Improvement Program. The new concept envisioned goes beyond the CIP to include regional facilities over a buildout time period (20 years instead of five years) and reactivation of the City's fiscal model which was done for the General Plan. Complex multi - level /multi -year forecasting is now necessary. Further complexities involve relating other agencies' capital expenditures (i.e., sewer, schools, etc.), doing a joint fiscal analysis over a 20 -year time frame as well as developing a model to determine the necessary land base support capabilities as they relate to financing options. 3N� City Financial Plan April 6, 1933 Page 2 The major tasks of the proposed financing plan are listed in Exhibit "A". Such tasks provide the basis for a Request for Proposal (RFP) and selection of a consultant. This project cannot be accomplished by the City staff. Cost will ,be dependent upon scope of work and extent OT involvement, individual and /or groups, and the analysis time period. The BIA has offered to assist financially in the plan preparation as it sees the plan mutually beneficial. The BIA comments are attached as Exhibit "B ". Note, however, that the offer is on a prepaid fee basis. The financial plan project will be in two parts which can be started almost simultaneously. The first is the updating and reactivation of the City's fiscal model to update unit cost and level of services, and development to date dealing with forecasting based upon current growth assumptions. The second part is the analysis and actual program strategy development. To bring discussion of a financial plan to some conclusion (or beginning) the following issues are posed to the Council: 1. what kind of financial plan does the Council find appropriate (short -term, or long -term comprehensive)? 2, what scope of work should the plan include (local, regional, major task, etc.)? 3. Should the financial forecasting model be converted to micro computer to allow local updating and accessibility? 4. Extent of involvement of plan development and review? 5. How to pay for the study, and level of participation to all interested parties? RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council discuss the need for a financial plan and provide staff with direction as to the type of financial plan desired and direct staff to prepare a detailed RFP to solicit proposals and obtain firm cost estimates. Respectfully Tbmitted, Jack Lam, AICP Director of Community Development JL:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Major Task Outline Exhibit "B" - Letter From BIA i ��g 09 L u 0 MAJOR TASKS RANCHO COCAIdONGA FINANCIAL PLAN 1. Analysis of Financial Revenues to the City A. Identify all revenue sources for capital, maintenance, and operations 2. Analysis of Projected Financial Revenues A. Establish growth assumptions B. Identify shortfalls and /or surpluses • C. Identify revenue shift possibilities 0 3. Identify Capital Facilities for Buildout A. Total costs for capital facilities B. Operations cost and maintenance costs for facilities 4. A. Identify alternatives B. Match financing mechanisms for optimizing capital 5. Financial Game Plan A. Cefine elements of priority B. define strategies C. Relate to growth assumot'nns Exhibit "A" z.:? a mWN Jl3w4hact.f uu:[clin, industry d'SJG:a[:on of southern Curyhprr 3. Inc. March 31, 1983 ,Jack Lam Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91701 Dear Jack: v ,�. gc v✓ i� r. LEVF! GPi4N7 GEP7- f'dHE 3 1 1y83 AM '71319110111112111213141_ g Attached is a letter drafted by the private sector members of the Rancho Cucamonga Financial Task Force containing our comments on the City's Financial Plan outline. This letter has been reviewed by the Board of Directors of the three private- sector orou;:s involved in the Task Force -- the Baldy View Chapter of the Building industry Association, the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, and the West San Bernardino County Board of Realtors. C7 As we state in the letter, we are very supportive of and interested in the Plan, and wish to see its development proceed as quickly as possible, incorporating• the ideas and specifics outlined in this draft. We will be in touch with you as additional comments arise. Sincerely, i Garry Br we Executi a Director GB:nd Attachment ]'I' c', In A 2,07 U;nna ,A 1+rgr, 7 111 181-2';97 ;, 940-2869 Exhibit "B" ,),-6 • BeDreSenbrg all of San ;iwn,p•;, no County An Affiliate of the NAHB and the CBIA Lis SIB bu.ic ;nq industry assoc anon of southern m:iFoc ..a, urc. LETTER TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA WITH COMMENTS ON THE FINANCIAL PLAN The purpose which we see in the development of the financial plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is to identify the City's future revenue needs, based on projected expenditures, and locate sources of funds in addition to development fees. It is incumbent upon both the public and private sectors to construct mechanisms for financing infrastructure and operations which will be to the mutual benefit of all parties. This proposed plan is one such effort. Because this is an effort of concern to the business and development community as a whole as well as the public sector, the outline for the plan itself needs to be and will be reviewed by the City Council and the Boards of Directors of the Baldly View Chapter of the Building industry Association, the Rancho Cuca- monga Chamber of Commerce, and the West San Bernardino County Board of Realtors. In this way, we will continue the education and participation of several of the groups directly concerned. • We, as representatives of these organizations, have reviewed the outline pre- pared by City staff and agree with the major components as presented. We do have several comments, both on the outline and thus the plan itself, and on the timeline for the development of the plan. The plan must be viewed as flexible, subject to and open to change as the City's needs and the availability of funds change over time. We see this as a 20 -year plan. One of the key elements in this plan is the tracking of the timing of the needed expenditures and the anticipated revenues so,that we may plan adequately for them and have a realistic vision of cash flow demands over time. Our recom- mendation here is two -fold: First, the overall plan should be broken down into four five -year capital improvements plans, and second, a procedure for monitor- ing the plan and making recommendations for modifications based on periodic reviews of capital improvements must be established. The latter would be an on -going management responsibility best performed by a review board with rep- resentatives froin both the public and private sectors. We would also recommend that the plan identify the future capital needs of the special districts which serve Rancho Cucamonga, so that the plan will present an accurate portrayal of the City's overall needs. It is also vital to relate financing mechanisms available city -wide to financing mechanisms available through the Redevelopment Agency. The Agency, over the next nua,er of years, will have the vast majority of funds corning into the City available to it for use. It is important to relate the needs for and expendi- tures for those projects lying within the Agency's purview to those which are not. The greater level of need for these funds lies within the Agency's bound- aries. . °.p f i .r � ,T r n o, p;yl ., , n •., 'nrrt'.q .JI of San Rurnaraino County Jr; ena '.:A e!' -1, 1F1 :1 9e!,: d�N or uau.fdb,, d,I MLhafe of Ire, M1,116 and fne CDIA 'k 1�I Rancho Cucamonga Financial Task Force (Private Sector Participants) March 22, 1983 Letter to Rancho Cucamonga with Comments on the Financial Plan Page 2 I 1 U For example, the resolution of the known current need for at least two new fire stations, one to serve the Industrial Area and one to serve the Planned Communi- ties' and the Etiwanda area,'will probably be a function of money derived from the redevelopment tax increment, other subventions, and the use of a mechanism such as the Xello -Roos Assessment. This is made possible through the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, AS 3554, which authorizes the establishment of a community facilities district to provide an alternative method of financing capital facilities through the levying of a special assessment. The financing for schools is apt to be a function of the reservation of some of the Redevelopment Agency's tax increment and fees or assessments. The solution to sewer capacity would again relate to the reservation of tax - increment and fees or assessments, once the optimally efficient sewer and reclamation system has been designed as the subject of a separate study. In all of those cases, some of ttie funding comes from those three sources: the Redevelopment Agency, fees, and assessments. These, when added to all other fees and assessments required for the operation of the City itself, will deter- mine the feasibility of raising the required investment while still keeping our residential, commercial, and industrial land competitive with other cities. We see the timing and development of the plan itself as proceeding along two levels. First, the City's cash -flow model must be updated, and in such a manner as to be usable in the future. This should begin immediately. As a matter of • good faith, given the current budget situation, certain members of the private sector are willing to fund this updating, which may cost up to $20,000, so long as that expense is credited against future fees (as has been done in several earlier studies). The timing of the plan itself is a consideration. In an effort to expedite the process of developing the plan, we should utilize several sources available to us. The firm of Parsons, Ouaide, Brinkerhoff, transportation consultants, is currently working on the Route 30 Financial Plan. That study, in addition to others which have been completed, will serve to facilitate the timing of the plan. We believe that the cr2airg together of these different works should and can be done expeditiously, are thus we need to proceed to the point of contrac- ting with a consultant as rao.dly as possible. In addition, Don Owen, Financial Consultant_ and President of Don Owen and Associates, is in the process of completing Just the sort of analysis that we `eel that we need in his preparation of the C)'•no Hills Financial Plan. He has aireacy cone the work of identify2n9 sources of funds and costs of improvements. He could possibly adapt this plan to Rancho Cucamono_a's circumstances. Certain- ly, we should consult with Dun Owen and with Mike Walker, West Valley REgional Manarer for Sdn Bernardino Ccunty, very soon on the applicability of the Chino Hills Plan to what we are trying to accomplish. In order to begin moving for- ward wit) th's end of the analysis, a meeting has been arranged with those two to discuss the Chino Hills Plan. \J -1 (. 11 Rancho Cucamonga Financial Task Force (Private Sector Participants) March 22, :933 •Letter to Rancho .ucamonga with Comments on the Financial Plan Pace 3 • We believe that an exercise of looking at adapting the Chino Hills Financial Plan 'to the C v of Rancho Cucamonca, in some rough order of magnitude, could be accomplished by the budgetary hearings from May through duly, 1983. In sum, as members of this dual- sector task force, we are wholly supportive of the speedy development of the Rancho Cucamonga Financial Plan and the updating of the City's cash -flow model. We wish to see both of these tasks proceed as rapidly as possible, with full utilization of existing resources, both completed studies and consultation with experts currently involved in deve', oping such analyses. We are willing to do whatever we can to. expedite this process. 1)1 0) 0 0 0 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lauren Wasserman, City Clerk FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney DATE: March 31, 1983 RE: Adult Businesses Enclosed please find a proposed urgency Ordinance entitled "An Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 to Impose a Moratorium on the Establishment of Adult Businesses, and Declaring the Urgency Thereof" and my memorandum to the City Council. I recommend that you place this matter on the next available • City Council Agenda. The Ordinance must be adopted by a four - fifths (4/5) vote, and if it is so adopted will be effective for only forty - five (45) days. If the Ordinance is adopted, then it should be rescheduled for a public hearing and for an extension vote at the following City Council meeting. For your information I am enclosing a copy of Section 65858. Please refer to your set of codes for the notice procedures of Government Code Section 65856. RED:sjo Enclosures 49 2S4 0 • 9 fill L Vl' LYAla VaaV V V Vaa ua v a"Vaz (.+ V,1,_ MEMORANDUM al E- Date; March 30, 1903 — ,A 1977 To: City Council and City Manager From: Dill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Requested special Meeting Mell o-Roos Community Facilities Act if it is the pleasure of the Council, staff would request a special Council meeting to discuss the Community Facilities Act in relation to developing park sites in Rancho Cucamonga. More specifically: A) Presenting for your consideration the P.A.C. recommendation to Council; B) Presenting C.F.A. logistics to Council, which include: 1. Selection by Council of site(s) to be addressed by bond and scope of improvement at site(s); 2. Refining site plans and cost estimates of Council directed site(s); 3. Determining final "project" bottom dollar needed to implement Council's project selection; 4. Engage financial resources to determine bond structure; 5. Conclude any necessary agreements by Council for project sites concurrent with Steps 2 through 4 above; 5. Determine final "bonding" bottom dollar (includes all costs associated with design, construction, interest payback, overhead, etc.); 7. Determine by Council how the area of payback should be structured (i.e,, should it only be residential or should commercial /industrial be included? Should it be by benefit zones or citywide? (These are a few of the types of items that will be for Council consideration.); R. Council will then pull all the pieces together... financing what sites, financing how much, who will pay what, etc. This will then be the 'package'. 3sg Requested Special Meeting: Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act March 30, 1983 Page 2 9. Council wil% hold public hearings on the 'package', changing it or leaving it as is, depending upon the public hearings; 10. Set an election date pursuant to the terms of the 'Act'. There are other items than the ten enumerated above, but that gives you the basic areas that need Council consideration, and hence, the need for a meeting separate and apart from your normally busy agendas. we will be sending you a detailed memorandum containing particulars for your consideration prior to that meeting. This will probably be the first of several Council meetings needed to complete the steps outlined above in developing the 'package'. it we have no recommendation for a meeting date, but at your pleasure, any of the following are available: April 11 Gallery West; April 12 Gallery West; April 14 Gallery West after 7; or April 18 Forum. (Heavy facility usage, as you can see by limited availability of dates is good ... and that is not good for providing a wider range of meeting dates... sorry.) If I can answer any questions during the interim, please give me a call. • WLH:nm p.s. we will not be presenting the particulars as outlined above at your April 6 meeting... only asking for a special meeting date. • 351 0 • U,I �r Ll.1( 1k it — to — �I3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM March 16, 1983 TO: City Council FROM: Richard M. Dahl, Councilman RE: Landscaped Medians -- Arrow, Archibald, and Base Line Road REQUEST: c�MO,y� o old JL U > 19777 I have had numerous requests that we study the need and impact of land- scaped medians designated for Arrow, Archibald, and Base Line Road. FOLLOW UP: In discussions with City Engineer Lloyd Hubbs, it was pointed out to me that the cost of just maintaining these medians Would be in excess of one million dollars per year. In light of our city's financial crisis and the need to increase our park systems and the maintenance costs for parks and existing parkways, it would appear that we will need to reorganize our priorities (I have problems with landscape maintenance districts that cost the homeowner or landowner for unnecessary require- ments such as medians) . CONCLUSION: I would respectfully request that this matter be referred to the Planning Commission. I do feel, however, that a median is necessary in front of the high school to discourage "jay walking" once our traffic signal at Vineyard is installed. RMD : nk A .37 • E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 6, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Status Report on Flood Control Measure W In the wake of the recent flooding, the Citizen's for Flood Control Group formed to campaign for Measure "W" and have begun to meet actively. The Group which involves representatives of all of the West Valley Cities has tentatively decided again to place the Measure on the ballot. The tentative schedule calls for developing the issue by July 11 with the Measure being placed on the ballot with the School Board Elections in November. Mayor Pro -Tem Buquet and myself have been attending these meetings along with Jeff Sceranka. Both Chuck and Jeff are actively involved in the program. The proposal is headed for a direct conflict with the Park Bond Program. It would be advisable to decide on which issue to pursue at this time to avoid conflict and unnecessary staff commitment to one or the other of these programs. Respectfully su itted, ✓.�� d5z�-Z� LB ;(�f C�Cn.NpY CITY OF j RANCHO CUCAMONGA r REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA 1977 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California April 20, 1983 -- 7:00 p.m, 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Roll Call: Buquet_, Dahl_, Frost_ Schlosser , and Mikels_ B. Approval of Minutes: Mzrch 2, 1983. 2. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. No items submitted. 3. STAFF REPORTS A. PROPOSED DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS FOR COOPERATION WITH CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AND FOOTRILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. b. ADJOORNMENT a` a _iYWj VK -Eel-. T 4CA11% L� Z t 0 Z U > 1977 MY OF RAN KM CUCAMONGA TC0UNCL AGENDA Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Ranebo Cucamonga, California April 20, 1983 -- 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda suet be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. • B. Roll Call: Buquet _' Dahl—, Frost_ Schlosser , and Mikels C. Approval of Minutes: February 16, 1983, March 2, 1983, and April 11, 1983• 2. ANNOONCEMMS a. Thursday, April 21, 1963 - 7:00 p.m. - ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN HEARING /CITY COUNCIL - Lions Park Community Center. b. Thursday, April 21, 1983 - 7:00 p,m. - PARKS COMMITTEE - Lions Park Community Center. C. Thursday, April 21, 1983 - 9:00 a,m, - FLOOD CONTROL MEETING - Ontario Chamber of Commerce Office. d. Monday, April 25, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - MELLO -ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT MEETING /CITY COUNCIL - Lions Park Community Center. e. Wednesday, April 27, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. f. Thursday, April 28, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - ADVISORY �� COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. City Council Agenda -2- April 20, 1983 g. Monday, May 2, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - COMMUNITY GOALS /CITY COUNCIL - Lions Park Community Center. -. h. Tuesday, May 17, 1983 - 7:00 p.m. - ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN HEARING /CITY COUNCIL - Lions Park Community Center. i. Presentation of Proclamation to Rancho Cucamonga Women's Club Proclaming April 24, 1983 as Federation Day. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83-04 -20, and Payroll ending 83 -04 -03 in the amount of $356,054.64. b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for off -sale beer R wine License for Nor Arco, Inc., 9533 Foothill Boulevard. c. Refer Claim against the City by Ron Vaughn, Alice Vaughn, and Christine Vaughn to the City Attorney for • handling. d. Refer Claim against the City by Leonard Eugene Bennett, 8267 London Avenue, Alta Loma, to the City Attorney for handling. e. Refer Claim against the City by Carl N. Brady to the City Attorney for handling. f. Authorize awarding of contract for street striping and pavement marking services to Pacific Striping of Hacienda Heights, the lowest bidder, at $29,781.00. g. Request approval of Assessment District 82 -1 Contract Change Order No. 6 relating to an existing box culvert on Haven Avenue south of 4th Street as shown on sheet 63 of 75 of the Plans. h. Request approval of Subordination Agreement by Dr. Kornblatt for 10010 Almond Street. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM MELVIN B. KORNBLATT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME. i 1 3 5 7 9 11 17 20 22 City Council Agenda -3- April 20, 1983 • i. Approval of Storm Drain Reimbursement Agreement which 25 provides for credits and reimbursement of storm drain fees in conjunction with storm drain improvements on the Pic -N -Save Project, Parcel Map 6658 - Etiwanda Properties. j. Approval of Contract Amendment for Design of Storm 30 Restoration Work with L. D. King Engineering for Hellman Avenue /San Bernardino Road to Base Line Road. k. Award of contract for emergency restoration and repairs 31 at various locations. 1. Set Public Hearing for June 15, 1983 for the Vacation of 39 a Portion of 8th Street located between Haven Avenue and the east property line of Parcel Map 7797. (Public utilities and property owners will be notified of public hearing). RESOLUTION NO. 83-47 41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING • ITS INTENTION TO VACATE 8TH STREET LOCATED BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL MAP 7797. 4. ADVERTIZED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCER AMENDMENT 83 -02 - SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT. An amendment to Section 61.0217 of the Zoning Ordinance to include an overlay district containing various development incentives to produce senior citizen oriented multi- family housing, as well as site development and general overlay district location criteria. First considered by Council at the March 2nd meeting. Staff report by flick Gomez, City Planner. ORDINANCE NO. 193 (second reading) 42 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0217 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE CREATING A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83 -01 (PARCEL MAP 7827) - CALMARK. A change of zone from R -3 (multiple - family residential /planned development) to R- 3 /SO (multiple family residential /senior overlay) and the development of 269 apartment units, of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres generally City Council Agenda -4- April 20, 1983 • located west of Archibald, north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 - APN 202- 151 -34. (Related file: CPA 83 -03). Item first considered by Council at the March 2 meeting. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. ORDINANCE NO. 201 (second reading) 46 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 151 -34, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 7827 AND LOCATED NEST OF ARCHIBALD, NORTH OF BASE LINE FROM R -3 /PD TO R -3 /SO. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 83- 03 - CALMARK. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from medium -high residential (14 -24 dwelling units /acre) to high residential (24 -30 dwelling units /acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of land located west of Archibald, and north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -34. (Related file: PD 83 -01). Item first considered at the March 2 meeting. Staff report by Rick • Gomez, City Planner. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -26 47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED LAND USE PLAN OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 83 -01. An amendment to Chapter 1, Section 1.08.160 and 1.08.170 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding home occupation permits. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. ORDINANCE NO. 199 (second reading) 48 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 1.08. 160 AND 1.08.170 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNCIPAL CODE REGARDING HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT,, E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83-02 51 TENTATIVE TRACT 123-4-2) - RANCHO CENTER. A change of zone from R -3 (multiple family residential) to R -3 /PD 0110 (multiple family residential /planned development) and the development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes on 6.4 acres located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman - APN 208- 011 -02, and 04. City Council Agenda -5- 1 April 20, 1983 ORDINANCE NO. 202 (first reading) 87 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 208- 011 -02 AND 04, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 6395 LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE, ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE FROM R -3 TO R -3 /PD FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12362. 5. ORDINANCES FOR CONSIDERATION None submitted for consideration. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. CONSIDERATION OF THCHNICIAN POSITION. Staff report by BB Jack Lam, Community Development Director. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS • None submitted for consideration. 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. CONTINUATION OF DISCUSSION REGARDING MEDIAN ISLANDS FOR 89 THE CITY. Item was originally requested by Councilman Dahl at the March 16 city council meeting. Council requested that staff compile all city policies relating to median islands and bring back to council for further discussion. 9. ADJOURNMENT Meeting to adjourn to Thursday, April 21, at 7:00 p.m, in the Lions Park Community Center for Public Hearing on the Etiwanda Specific Plan. a� • February 16, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Wednesday, February 16, 1983. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were: City Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Community Services Director, Bill Holley; and Finance Director, Harry Empey. Absent: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman, and Assistant City Manager, James Robinson, who were attending a City Manager's Department meeting in Monterey. • Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to approve the minutes of January 19, 1983• Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Council concurred to defer the February 7 minutes to March 2 for approval since not everyone had read them. e.�.r, i; �an;Zy;rla8i.4 a. Mr. Lam stateC we had inadvertently left the Christmas House item off the Agenda which Council had referred to this meeting. He requested it be considered under City Manager's Staff Reports, Item "H". Council concurred. b. Mayor Mikels stated the meeting would adjourn to an Executive Session regarding pending litigation. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83-02 -16 and Payroll ending 83 -02 -06 in the amount of $484,404.76. b. Approval of Assessment District 82 -1 Warrants, Register No. 1 -83, in the amount of $1,047,216.78. is r.. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On -Sale General Eating Place, Clifford J. d Socorro M. Solorzano, Socorro's, 10276 Foothill Blvd. d. Award of contract to La Belle Consultants of Santa Ana, low bidder, for pavement and subgrade analysis of Archibald Avenue between Fourth Street 40 and Base Line Road which is required for street A.C. overlay design purposes. Contract amount not to exceed $9,250.00. e. Award of contract to C.G. Engineering of San Bernardino, low bidder, for A.C. overlay design services on Archibald Avenue, between Fourth Street and Base Line Road. Contract amount not to exceed $15,000.00. f. Approval of Agreement with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and Lewis Development Co. regarding the connection of Terra Vista drainage facilities into Deer Creek. g Approval of Parcel Map 7666, Herbert Hawkins Co., Inc., located on the southeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Turner Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 7666. h. Release of Bonds: Plot Plan 94 -88, located at 8833 Industrial Land, Rancho Cucamonga. Owner: Harold W. A Donna D. Sears. Faithful Performance Bond $8,400.00 • Tract 9193, located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Base Line. Owner: William Lyon Company. M,onumentation Bond $1,000.00 Tract 9262, located on the east side of Vineyard, south of Base Line. Owner: William Lyon Company. Monumentation Bond $1,000.00 I. Relese of Lien Agreement for construction of sidewalk improvements on Milliken Avenue for Parcel Map 6585 as requested by R.C. Industrial Company. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM B.C. INDUSTRIAL COMPANY. j. Forward Claim by Ronald Payne to the city attorney for handling. k. Forward Claim by Dennis Gill to the city attorney for handling. • 1. Approval of Assessment District 82 -1 Contract Change Order No. 5 relating to the deletion of chain link fence top rail. This will result in a 0 savings of $5,280.00 to the subject contract. M. Set public hearing date of March 2, 1983 for Environmental Assessment and Zoning Ordinance Amendment 83 -02 - Senior Housing Overlay District. An amendment to Section 61.0217 of the Zoning Ordinance to include an overlay district containing various development incentives to produce senior citizen oriented multi - family housing as well as site development and general overlay district location criteria. n. Set public hearing date of March 2, 1983 for Environmental Assessment and Planned Development 83 -01 (PM 7877) - Calmark. A change of zone from R- 3/PD (multiple family residential /planned development) to R -3 /SO (multiple family residential /senior overlay) and the development of 269 apartment units, of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres generally located west of Archibald, north of Base Line - Parcel 2 or Parcel Map 5792 - APN 202- 151 -34. (related file: GPA 83-03). o. Set public hearing date of March 2, 1983 for Environmental Assessment and Planned Development 82 -06 - Tentative Tract 12320 - L d G. A change of zone from R -3 -T (multiple family residential) to R -3 /PD (multiple family residential /planned development) and the development of 116 condominiums on 8.98 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Avenue - APN 202 - 181 -07. • p• Set public hearing date of March 2, 1983 for Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 83 -03 - Calmark. A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan from medium -high resideg6l,I} (14 -mod dwelling units per acre) to high residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of land located west of Archibald, north of Base Line - APN 202 - 151 -34 (related file: PD 83 -01). q. Approval of Recertification of Declarations of Impaction for Chaffey Joint Union High School District and Alta Loma Elementary School District. r. Forward Claim by Stephen Miles Corbin to the city attorney for handling. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PLANNED COMIUNITY 81 -01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. The Terra Vista Planned Community consists of approximately 1300 acres and is bounded by Base Line and Foothill Boulevard on the north and south, and by Rochester and Haven on the east and west. The City Council reviewed the project at an adjourned meeting on Monday, February 7, 1983. The second reading was before Council for consideration. Staff report by Michael Vairin, Senior Planner. Mr. Vairin stated he received the revised text from Lewis Homes the next day after the hearing. He reviewed it, then worked with Lewis Homes and made further revisions based on Council's direction. The revised text before Council was based upon direction given at the last meeting -- mainly those relating to the Park Plan. Mr. Holley presented information on parks which Council had requested regarding the various options for the 13.2 acres of dedicated parkland. In his staff report to Council dated February 14th, he outlined the options as follows: 1. Take land in a dedicated, developed state, or 2. Take land undeveloped. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: *Ralph Lewis, Lewis Homes, expressed appreciation for the fast action Prom staff in getting this ready for adoption. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Mayor Mikels stated that the Council should consider the 13.2 acres. Mr. Dahl stated he was in favor of utilizing raw land instead of improved land for this project, and he was in favor of moving the location of the site from Base Line and Deer Creek to Base Lice and Milliken. For the record, he wanted to know if Mr. Lewis would be willing to extend the date from a 12 month • period for the purchase of the oroperty to 24 months. He did not want to include this in the text because it would effect: -,�K passage of the ordinance, however. *Mr. Lewis responded to the statement by Mr. Dahl of 12 months or 24 months. He said they wanted to he reasonable. They hoped if they agreed to this, it would not constitute a change so the ordinance would not be approved tonight. He would hate to have this point hold them up. For the record, he stated they would be reasonable on that request and try to comply with it. Mayor Mikels asked that since the Lewis Co. will be coming back with a Park Implementation Plan following the adoption of the Planning Community, could provisions be made to implement any decisions made tonight in the Parks Implementation Plan? Mr. Dougherty responded that he would caution Council that if a change were made, that the Ordinance should be given a second reading. On an issue such as this the Parks Implementation Plan could supersede the text. Basically, it would be extending the deadline. Mr. Lewis could extend the deadline for negations it any time. Mr. Frost asked Mr. Lewis if it was the intent of his company to actively assist the city in its aequisiticn of the 99 acres? Mr. Lewis stated they do not agreed that under the law they owed that • much, therefore, he was not willing to say they would actively cooperate. Council uan impose whatever condition it wants, and they will have to weigh it and discuss when they get into the Parks Implementation Iq 0 Plan. They did not want to commit themselves right now. Mr. Frost stated it probably will take perhaps up to ten years before the fourth phase of the proposal is completed. It seems as though during that time the City could acquire that park over some type of phased purchase agreement similiar to what we did with Heritage Park. He wanted to know how serious Mr. Lewis was in working with the City. Twelve to twenty -four months would be unrealistic. If we make that firm a commitment, then we will never have that park. Mr. Lewis stated they buy lots of land. They have never had a seller tell them they could have it when they want it and pay in ten years. Usually if you want title now, you put cash in escrow. If you want terms, you negotiate. He felt it was not fair for the City to ask them to hold this for ten years. Their attorney said they could bring in a man and request the City to buy the land, condemn the land, or approve the Mao. They were not doing that, nor threatening to do that. Mr. Buquet stated that Mr. Frost's concern was we have had several offers for parkland throughout the City. We are very interested in acquiring the 99 acres for a total park site. It was hoped that something could be worked out so the City would be acquiring the last parcel at the same time Lewis Co. would be completing the final phase. • Mr. Dahl stated this points out the need for the City to look at alternative Methods of financing our parks system and points out the need for more public involvement from a financial standpoint. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost that the undeveloped dedicated park site to located on the west side of Milliken, north of Base Line, south of the railroad right -of -way, and moving in a westerly direction until dedication requirement is fulfilled. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mr. Dougherty stated that although Mr. Lewis has not made a firm commitment regarding the 24 month time period, he has indicated a spirit of cooperation. Therefore, he did not feel comfortable with the effect of the Parks Implementation Plan as an amendment to this Plan, in the absence of a firm commitment from Mr. Lewis if Council wishes to insert the 24 month provision in the text, it should be done as a formal amendment to the text which would require a new first reading. *Mr. Lewis stated he promised to commit to the 24 month Period. Council questioned if Mr. Lewis' word would be sufficient in this easel Mr. Dougherty jtated that Mr. Lewis' word to extend this to the 24 months should be good. Mr. Dahl felt that Mr. Lewis would like an indication by the Council that in • the event Lewis Homes could obtain the proper tenants that we would be receptive to a regional shopping center at the corner of Haven and Foothill. Council had no comment. Jack Lam read the title of Ordinance No. 190. ORDINANCE NO. 190 (second reading) • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE NO. 81 -01 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN BASE LINE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH AND BETWEEN ROCHESTER AND HAVEN ON THE EAST AND WEST. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to approve Ordinance No. 190. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: None ABSENT: None B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82-05 - TENTATIVE TRACT 12305 - ROY. A change of zone from R -3 (multiple family residential) to R- 3 /PD (multiple family residential /planned development) for the development of 59 condominium units on 5.24 acres of land located north of 19th Street, east of Hellman Avenue - APN 201- 232 -34, 54. First reading held on January 19, 1983. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. • Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:. *Jean View, 9231 Harvard, speaking for Mr. A Mrs. Brashear on 6649 Hellman. They were in favor of the change and of the condominiums instead of apartments. *Charles Roy, developer, stated he was present to answer any questions of the Council. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Jack Lam read the title of Ordinance No. 188. ORDINANCE NO. 188 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201- 232-34, 54 LOCATED NORTH OF 19TH STREET, EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE FROM R -3 TO R- 3 /P.D. Motion; Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 188. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve Ordinance No. 188 and • to approve the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Motion carried by the following vote: U SAYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: None ABSENT: None C. FORMATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE. A public hearing to determine whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the formation of an underground Utility District No. 1 along Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street. Staff report by Richard Cots, Associate Civil Engineer. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: *Tom Garnella, Assistant Superintendent for Business Services at Central School District, 9457 Foothill Boulevard, had questions whether the project would provide all off -site trenching, conduit and patching at no expense to the School District? Mr. Cota stated that any trenching and back filling on private property would be done at the expense of the property owner. However, there was only one property on the west side that needed work done. On the east side, the School District had a light which needed to be relocated. *Mr. Christopher, of Barmakian, Wolfe, Christopher, A Lang, stated that basically the school's main service came in underground. They had a minor service to their maintenance facility that came in overhead and a portable classroom that would need to be trenched for on -site, patching and repairs. This would involve an amount of money to the District. Mr. Coto stated that possibly Edison could establish another pole within their premises. Mayor Mikels stated the School District could confer with staff members on these technical questions later. *Mr. Garnella continued that they were in favor of making Rancho Cucamonga more attractive. They were concerned about the costs which could be between $3 to 5,000. They wanted the City to be sensitive to their financial situation. *Jan MoMahn, 7820 Archibald, stated they received their utilities from the alley and not from Archibald. There were only six residences on the west side of Archibald. She expressed they would not be able to come forth with the $1,000. (She was located between Tryon and Church Streets). Mr. Cola ,;toted that those served from the alley would not be affected. *Joanne Galvin, 9684 Tryon, stated she felt she was hooked up to a pole on Archibald. Mayor Mikels asked that Mr. Cota check to see if the service would be affected. He would not close the public hearing until this was straightened out. 0 *Mr. Garne'_la stated they would need more time in order to get with the Edison Company in order to get a final dollar amount. He had talked with Bill Wieland of Edison, and he assured them the major costs in regard to transformers and transformer volts would be born by Edison as part of the relocation project. *Mr. Pete Ferro, 8212 London Avenue, representing Mr. Smilery who owns the house on the corner of Estacia and Archibald. Their concern was that their homes were very old. They could be serviced from the alley. However, would Edison require a lot of improvements before hookups in order to bring their homes up to code? Since there were so many questions, Mayor Mikels directed the people with concerns to go with staff into another room. Council would continue with the meeting and come back to this item later in the evening. D. EMBONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -04 - TT 12091 - SALVATI. A change of zone from M -1 (limited manufacturing) to R -3 /PD (multi- family /planned development) and the development of 248 condominiums on 11.35 acres located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Grove Avenue - APN 207 - 251 -02, 03, 13• Staff report by Rick Gomez, city planner. Mayor M.ikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, • the public hearing was closed. Jack Lam read the title of Ordinance No. 192. ORDINANCE 110. 192 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 207 - 251 -02, 03, 13 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND GROVE AVENUE FROM M -1 TO R- 3/PD. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 192. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels set second reading of Ordinance No. 192 for March 2, 1983• E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82 -04 - MIM MACK. A change of zone from A -1 (limited agriculture) to R -1 (single family residential) for 5.25 acres of land, located on the east side of Beryl Street, 1000 feet south of 19th Street- APN 202 - 041 -15. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. Mayor Mikela opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: *Greg Bramlet, 7068 Beryl Street, asked if there were any provisions for • restriction or control of traffic on Beryl due to this change between Base Line and 19th Street? He felt additions in housing would increase traffic on Beryl which at peak hours is already quite heavy. 0 • Mr. Gomez responsed that the Parcel Map was only done to separate two houses on the piece of property. At this time it is not anticipated that there will be any additional building or additional impact to the circulation. Mr. Lam stated that if there is a concern about traffic, it should be addressed to the City's Traffic Committee. There being no further response from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Jack Lam read the title of Ordinance No. 191. ORDINANCE NO, 191 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 041 -15 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BERYL STREET, 1000 FEET SOUTH OF 19TH STREET FROM A -1 TO R -1. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 191. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Further comments from the Council: is Mr. Buquet expressed concern about the matter on Eastwood. He did not feel it was clear regarding the impact of the zone change and the lot splitting. He did not feel the issue regarding Eastwood was adequately addressed, and wanted to make sure there was no confusion. Mr. Dahl expressed that the zone change did not affect the lot split and felt the handling of Eastwood was well covered since it had to be rezoned to conform to the General Plan at the request of any landowner in the City. Mr. Frost felt they were in error in allowing the Parcel split without some type of mitigation on Eastwood. Mr. Doughe,,ty stated we are acting,, on a zone change at this, time and not with the specifies of the parcel map. Mayor Mikels set the second reading of Ordinance No. 192 far March 2, 1983. Mayor Mikels called a recess it 8 :50 p.m. since everyone was not ready to discuss the last public hearing item on the Underground Utility District. The meeting reconvened it 9:05 p.m, with all members of council and staff present. • • N w w ITEM C - CONTINUED: FORMATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1.. Mr. Hubbn stated all the people would be served by overhead poles. The School District needed to get with Edison regarding their problem. Mayor Mikels .stated the public hearing was .still open on this item. He asked if anyone wished to further address the issue. There being no further Ca comments, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. • Jack Lam read the title of Resolution No. 83 -6. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TO CHURCH STREET. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Resolution No. 83 -6. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mr. Frost stated we should come up with a better choice. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to adopt Resolution No. 83 -6. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels NOES: Frost ABSENT: None 5. CITI MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. CONSIDERATION OF GENRAL PLAN AND ZONE CHANGE FOR AREA LOCATED SOUTH OF • .nc inu ruan). rroperty owners a0jacent to this area have requested the City to examine the feasibility of changing the designation along 6th Street to residential land use. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing Council were: *Bob Townsend, 9213 Amethyst, stated they did not like this; it will make the area an island surrounded by industrial. *Valda Quinn, 9241 Layton, PTA president for Cucamonga Middle School, addressed the issue of safety for the children. *Danny Astrobaum, 9260 Layton, expressed concern about the traffic with young families and children. Mr. Buquet asked Mr. Gomez to explain what the Industrial Park designation includes. Mr. Gomez stated the Industrial Park category allows for low intensity office type uses and small industrial office type of uses. This would allow office, professional, and very light industrial manufacturing. Also uses which are accessory uses to those types of office related uses would be allowed. *Dave Walker, 9279 Layton, expressed concern about the apathy by the • Planning Department to their Concerns. *Bill Fillkill, 9259 Layton, asked why does th Ls keep coming back to • industrial since the original plan shows residential? Mayor Mikels asked if any request had come in from the property owners. Mr. Gomez stated that Lusk and Marlborough wanted to be in "light industrial" area, but the plan shows industrial park. *Gerry Koski, stated they have never been opposed to some type of commercial. He presented a transparency showing an industrial park north of Fourth Street and along Archibald with some medium high to low medium densities toward 6th Street. Others expressing disapproval with the Industrial designation were: *Rita Banks owner of homes at 9288 Layton and 9595 Mettle. *Sreg Roundtree, 9566 Deerbrook *Mark Knowles, 9548 Deerbrook *Shay Stewart, 9195 Amethyst *Jan Mc Mahn, 7802 Archibald *Sonya Davis, 9795 Deerbrook • *Carla Florence Neilson, 9580 Meadows There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public portion of the meeting. Mr. Frost stated he leaned toward a modification as shown on Page 92 of the Agenda Packet. Mr. Schlosser stated the airport will grow and the industrial parks are a viable thing. Ile felt putting more homes in that area with a few hundred more children would only complicate the problem. Mr. Buquet stated he didn't feel putting in condominiums or apartments in that area would be a good idea either. Mr. Dahl stated his position has always been, even while he was a Planning Commissioner, that not all of the 120 acres, which allows for different types of uza ge, should be light industrial. The area along 6th Street should be buffered with low medium type housing. Light industrial behind the low medium would be compatible with the housing. The area along 4th Street should be commercial. He favored the concept in Alternative 2 on page 91 with the exception that the center area should be designated light industrial. Mayor Mikels stated the request before Council was to consider a general plan amendment for Subarea 16. Motion: Moved by Dahl to re- review this toward the adoption of a designation as he suggested on Alternative 2 and to direct staff to commense a review with the idea of changes as reflected in Alternative 2. Motion died for lack of a second. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to increase the middle area designation of low medium to about halfway into the medium high designation on Alternative Two on page 91 of the Agenda, eliminate the commercial, refer the matter to the Planning Commission for their consideration, and request a general plan amendment. Discussion followed regarding this motion. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to close debate and vote on the issue. The motion passed to close debate by the following vote: AYES: Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels NOES: Dahl, Frost ABSENT: None Vote on the original motion which was moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to increase the middle designation, eliminate the commercial, refer to the Planning Commission, and request a general plan amendment failed by the following vote: 0 AYES: Dahl, Frost NOES: Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels ABSENT: None • Mayor Mikels expressed that the City was trying to protect that neighborhood instead of placing higher density apartments, etc. in that area. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to table the issue with consideration to give special review of any proposal for property for that area. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels NOES: Dahl, Frost ABSENT: None Mayor Mikels called a recess at 10:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11:00 p.m. with all members of the council and staff present. * * * * * B. COOPERATION AGHTEE14F,NT WITH COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROVIDING FOR USE OF County of San Bernardino is preparing a Housing Mortgage Revenue Bond which can be used for housing throughout Rancho Cucamonga. The program can be used to augment the RDA's 35-99 issue. Staff report by Tim Beedle, Senior Planner. Mr. Beudle stated that at the March 2 meeting, the Council will approve • agreements with the County and the RDA, and approve developer amendments. • Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, Mayor Mikels closed the public portion of the meeting. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to adopt Resolution No. 83 -21 and to waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mr. Lam read the title of Resolution No. 83 -21. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO'S HOUSING FINANCE REVENUE BONDS ISSUE B, PURSUANT TO THE HOME FINANCE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM. C. RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE ua urorma uepartmenc of Housing and Community Development does all reviews of local Housing Elements. This situation has caused numerous problems. The Resolution recommends to the State the possibility of changes in the Housing Element review procedure in order to improve the process. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner. • Mr. Lam read the title of Resolution No. 83 -22. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE LEGISLATURE OF SAID STATE THAT RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY FOR THE REVIEW OF LOCAL HOUSING ELEMENTS BE DELEGATED TO THE REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Resoluton No. 83 -22. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public oomnents. There being none, the Mayor closed the public portion of the meeting. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 83 -22. Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikel; NOES: None ABSENT: None D. APPEAL FOR FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM CALIFORNIA CITY - COUNTY STREET LIGHT ASSOCIATION. Staff report by Robert Rizzo, Administrative Analyst. Mr. Rizzo stated that since the City will benefit from this organization that Council should direct that the minimum contribution of $500 he sent for annual membership. No appropriation of funds will be necessary at this time since the first assessment will not be due until the next fiscal year. • Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments. There being none, the Mayor closed the public portion of the meeting. Motion: Moved by Frost that a letter of intent be sent regarding membership. Motion died for lack of a second. Discussion followed regarding the value of belonging to this organization. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to forward the minimum contribution of $500 to the Association for annual membership with the City Engineer as the prime contact person. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. E. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE MUNICIPAL REORGANIZATION ACT (MORGA) . The City of San Bernardino has requested our community join in opposition to a proposal advocated by the County of San Bernardino which would amend the Municipal Organization Act to permit the detachment or removal from a City without the specific permission of the municipality's governing body, Staff report by Jack Lam. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing Council were: *Dennis Johnson and Don Montague, Highland MAC members. • Mr. Frost suggested that this item should be continued to the next meeting in order to look at both sides of the issue. Council concurred to defer the item to the March 2, 1983 meeting. F. CONSIDERTION OF LIMITING THE PARKING AT VINEYARD PARK Staff report by Jack Lam. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing Council was: *Paul Saldana, representing the ritizens of Public Safety. He read their recommendation which was passed by a majority vote, "The parking lot at Vineyard Park should be closed to student parking during peak school hours." *Don Bonham, Citrus Little League, stated they used Vineyard Park during baseball season. He recommended that some type of limit be placed on the parking. Mr. Buquet stated his concerns were regarding the increased traffic, increased student population, and problems at the park regarding maintenance. Mr. Dahl asked how many parking spaces were there. Paul Saldana responded there were approximately 100. • Mr. Schlosser asked if Council could legally close the park. Mr. Dougherty stated we could not close the park, but we could restrict the length of time in the parking lot. It would Have to be enforced equally and not target any particular group. Motion: Moved by Buquet to limit parking at vineyard Parking lot to two hours on week days from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. to take effect on April 1. For lack of a second the motion failed. Action: Council concurred to monitor the problems. G. AGREEMENT WITH THE CBAFFET HUMANE SOCIETY FOR REMAINDER OF FISCAL YFJ1A 1982 -83. Staff report by Robert Rizzo, Administrative Analyst. Mr. Rizzo recommended approval of the agreement. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments. Addressing Council were: 'Betty Fryman, General Manager, Chaffey Humane Society. *Robert Schecter, Board member of the Chaffey Humane Society *Charles Cox, President of Chaffey Humane Society Board of Directors. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to participate with the cities • of Montclair and Ontario and the Chaffey Humane Society to request the California Conservation Corp. to participate in the construction of major capital improvements. In exchange for that agreement, the Humane Society will continue providing animal control for the duration of the fiscal year. Also, the Humane Society will pay 2/3 of the capital costs. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS Mr. Dougherty had nothing to report. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. ADDED ITEM: CONSIDERATION OF THE CHRISTMAS HOUSE. Mr. Lam explained that council had asked that this item be placed on the February 16th agenda for consideration. Inadvertently staff had omitted it. (Resolution No. 83- 13)• Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to table any further action regarding thn_ Christmas House until after the disposition of the house by the courts. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser NOES: Frost, Mikels 10 ABSENT: None 8. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to an Executive Session • not to reconvene. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 12:20 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk • i� ,e 0 March 2, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Repular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER A reGUlar meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, March 2, 1983, in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. The meeting was called to order at 7:55 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Brownie Troop 1051, led by Jill Cheat, led the flag salute. After which the girls presented the Council with balloons and Girl Scout Cookies. Mayor Mikels presented the Troop a Proclamation proclaiming March 6 - 12 as Girl Scout Week. Roll Call: Present: Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. • Also present: James Robinson, Assistant City Manager; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Senior Planners, Tim Beedle and Michael Vairin; City Engineer, Llovd Hubbs; Finance Director, Barry Empey; and Community Services Director, Bill iioiley. Absent: City Ytanager, Lauren M. Wasserman, who was attending the National League of Cities Meeting in Washington D.C.; Community Development Director, Jack Lam, and City Planner, Rick Gomez, who were in Monterey attending Planning Commiasicners Institute. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Lloyd Hobbs. City -Engineer mad a special slide presnntation depicting the flood demaRe todate as a result of the present storms. Bill Holley, Community Services Director, presented two Resolutions which nced,�d Lo adopted by Council. One Resoluti ^n wool' be sent to local and .itntn legislators to encourage the Governor to declare the City of Rancho Cucamcr,¢a a disaster area. The other Resolution was necessary in order for the city to start immediate repairs without having to go through the usual bid process, `:r. Robinson stated that several assemblymen and senators have already called expressing concern. isMr. Royineon read the title of Resolution No, 89 -27. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO • CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROCLAIMING EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY AND REQUESTING GOVERNOR TO (1) PROCLAIM A STATE OF EMERGENCY AND (2) REQUEST A PRESIDENTIAL DECLARATION. Potion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No. 83- 27 and to waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mr. Robinson read title of Resolution No. 83 -28. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EMERGENCY EXPENDITURES FOR REPAIRS OF PUBLIC ROADS AND STREETS, INCLUDING RIGHT OF :JAYS, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 37906. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approved Resolution No. 83 -28 and to waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. b. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting to those who were present with issues relating to flood control. Addressing Council was: Thomas Kiltic, 9335 Calle Varjar, stated his neighborhood consisting of seven homes has been having a continual problem with the catch • basin located between Hellman and Arrow backing up. During this storm it blocked up and flooded their homes. In the past, it has Dack up even when it was not raining. At times raw sewerage also backs up. Mayor Mikels thanked him for coming and making council aware of the problem. They would see that the City Engineer looked into this and inform., the Cucaso.n.;a County Water District who handled the sewer transmissicn. _. Bob Dutton suggested that council consider creating a city -wide assessment distriot for flood control, Mayor Mikels asked him if he were asking for Measure "W" to be resurrected. Mr. Dutton stated he was. He felt because of the problems with this storm that x3❑y.ai'_1 now vote for the Measure. He suggested that Council consider doing this on the November ballot. Mr. Dutton also expressed that perhaps the City of Rancho Cucamonga should to something even more since the funds received would not be enough to do the job adequately. d. 'Mr. Frost sugpested that Coannii direct Mr. Robinson to give staff a strong commendation for their work during the storms. Council concurred. e. Mayor Mikels announced that the EPA is poised to enforce funding and constriction sanctions on non - attainment areas for various emissions of various air pollutants. The offset would be to cut off all federal funding for 'nihaay and sewage plants and expansion projects within the Los Angeles • basin. He directed staff to write letters to the EPA and our legislators in opposition to those sanction. F. Mayor Mikels announced that two new metropolitan statistical areas are • being sugested for the County of San Bernardino. Previously we had been 'included with the Los Angeles /Long Beach metropolitan statistical area which did a disservice to our County. He directed staff to write letters to our legislator; Jr. support of the SANBAG resolution to create the new primary statistical area for reporting purposes. g. Maycr Mikels had received a letter from Supervisor Townsend regarding the Las Vegas Bullet Trail feasibility study. He directed staff to make copies for Council. He felt perhaps Council should review the material and take a position on this. h. Mayor Mikels announced that at the SANBAG meeting, the newest appointee to the California Transportation Commission, former Assemblyman Walt Engles, was present. He indicated his support for the Route 30 project. Also, at this me. =tin„ an overall work program of SANBAG was presented which included a $3:,000 consultant's study for some traffic system, management study for the Ranoho Cucamonga, Fontana, Ontario industrial areas. i. Councilman Buquet announced he had attended the League Public Safety Committee meeting. He stated Assemblyman Shear, Chairman of the Criminal Law and Public Safety Committee, was present. A gentleman was also present representing, the governor indicating that one of the too priorities would be funding for Public Safety Services for Police and Fire. Concern was also expressed regarding emergency services. Another area they were locking into • was to Provide cities the same type of protection the federal government receives in regards to law suits. j. Mr. Robinson requested that item "i" be removed from the Consent Calendar and continued to the March 16t'.. meeting. Council concurred. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approvai of 'Warrants, Register No. 83- 02 -28, for $80,258.04 and Payroll ending 83 -02 -20 for $139,963.18. b. Forward Clain by Louis and Yong Gonzales to the city attorney for handling. o. Forward Claim by Udom Aromdee to the city attorney for handling. d. Aleoholic Beverage Application for on -sale general license to Michael J's Coffee ;hops, Inc., 10165 Foothill Blvd. Award of contract for the Hillside Road Reconstruction Project to Rivc.,Iidc C,nstruetion, Riverside, California, the low bidder at $non,p.p. 99. f, Apprnvnl of revision of Traffic Signal. Maintenance Agreement between City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino. The agreement providca for payment to the County of actual cost plus 5% for City portion of signal maintenance and power on shared signals. g. Intent to Annex Tract No. 10045 as Annexation No. 12 to Landscape • Maintenance Distict No. 1. RESOLUTION NO. B3 -23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA;SON3 , CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENA ?ICE DISTRICT NO. 1 (TRACT 10045). RESOLUTION NO. 83 -24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS ANNEXATICN NO. 12 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO. h. Award of contract for construction of traffic signal at Base Line and Vineyard Avenue to MM &1I Construction and Engineering Company of Bloom4.n3ton, the lowest of eleven bidders at $54,990. • &. Apprave and 6xeeute }n €ermai eentraet Per the eemplet #en e€ V3neyarA Avenge Street imereVemeate and tra € €ie sivna :r FAi; M414R- 1;494�21r to RiVeraide 9enstruetisn OC R4vere #4er the }ewee9 §£d§er at '$258.954.49. Item, continued to the March 16 agenda. j. Approval of weed abatement contract between the City at Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino for an additional cost, not to exceed $500. k. Forward Claim against the City by Gordon and Edena Myers to the City Attorney for handling. Notion: !!oved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Calendar with item "i" removed. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Y. PUBLIC HEARINGS A 12091 - SALVATI. A change of zone from 4-1 (limited manufacturing) to R -3 1P0 (multiple family residential /planned development) for the development of 248 condnmin;,ir, units on 11.35 acres located it the northeast corner of 8th Street amt ;rove Avenue - AFN 207- 251 -02, 03, 13. Staff report by Michael Varirin, Senior Planner. 0 RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of PD 82 -04 and issuance of a negative declaration. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, iJ • the public hearing was closed. Mr. Robinson read the title of Ordinance No. 192. ORDINANCE NO. 192 (second reading) AD ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 207 - 251 -02, 03, 13 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND GROVE AVENUE FROM M -1 TO R- 3/P.D. h!otinn: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Duquet to adopt Ordinance No. 192 and to issue a Negative Declaration. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels NOES: None ABS -ENT: None B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANCE 82 -04 - MIM MACK. A change of zone from A -1 (limited agriculture) to R -1 (single family residential) for 5.25 acres of land, located on the east side of Beryl Street, 1000 feet south of 191;h Street - APN 202 - 041 -15. Staff report by Michael Vairin, Senior Planner. • R=MMENDATICN: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the zone change P2-04 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Fayor ' ?.kels opened the meeting for public hearing,. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Robinson reed the title of Ordinance No. 191. ORDINANCE. NO. 191 (second reading) AN QRDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU- AM-ONr,,A, CALIFOR ;Li, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 22- 041 -15 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BERYL STREET, 1000 FEET SOUTH OF 19TH STREET FROM A -1 TO R -1. !lotion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading,. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Counel.i:can Buquet expressed hi; concerns ;egardiog the Eastwood improvements on the went side. Counci7.r ;3n Front stated he awreed with Chuck. With a full sized vehicle you can't torn arnnnd; you have to back out. Councilman Dchl stated he did not feel •we should place the burden on the landowner at this time, but wait and make it a condition of future development. Council continued the discussion regarding the current street width and when the improvements should be required. Mr. '''.root suggested to continue the zone change. Mr. Vairzn stated the tentative map has been approved. Council acted on an appeal for it, and it has now passed. This is the last step. .1r. Buquet had no problem with the zone change, but the time element for the improvements. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve Ordinance No. 191 and to issue a Negative Declaration. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels NOES: Frost AP.SENT: None C. STORM DRAIN FRF. MODIFICATIONS. Item was first considered at the February 21 1983 city council meeting. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, • the public hearing was closed. M ^. Roo!nson read the title of Ordinance No. 75 -8. ORDINANCE NO. 75 -B (second reading) AN ORD21ANCR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU- AXCN1A, CALIFORNIA, AMENDI:vn CHAPTER 13.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE PLAN AND DRAINAGE FEES. Motion: Mcved by Schlosser, seconded by Bum ,. to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 75 -8. Motion carried unanimousiy I. Moticn: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No. 75- B. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquot, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels No'r13: None ABSENT; None D Ordinance to include an overlay district containing various development • incentives to produce senior citizen oriented multi- family housing, as well as cite dev ^..cpment and ;;eneral overlay district location criteria. Staff report by Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, and Rick Marks, Associate Planner. ORDINANCE NO. 193 (first reading,) • Mayor MiF:els stated that the item before Council was the zone change and not the Parcel itself. As soon as the zone change is acted upon, then it would hasten development of the property and thus the improvement of that half street. Mr. '''.root suggested to continue the zone change. Mr. Vairzn stated the tentative map has been approved. Council acted on an appeal for it, and it has now passed. This is the last step. .1r. Buquet had no problem with the zone change, but the time element for the improvements. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve Ordinance No. 191 and to issue a Negative Declaration. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Mikels NOES: Frost AP.SENT: None C. STORM DRAIN FRF. MODIFICATIONS. Item was first considered at the February 21 1983 city council meeting. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, • the public hearing was closed. M ^. Roo!nson read the title of Ordinance No. 75 -8. ORDINANCE NO. 75 -B (second reading) AN ORD21ANCR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU- AXCN1A, CALIFORNIA, AMENDI:vn CHAPTER 13.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE PLAN AND DRAINAGE FEES. Motion: Mcved by Schlosser, seconded by Bum ,. to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 75 -8. Motion carried unanimousiy I. Moticn: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No. 75- B. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquot, Schlosser, Frost, Mikels No'r13: None ABSENT; None D Ordinance to include an overlay district containing various development • incentives to produce senior citizen oriented multi- family housing, as well as cite dev ^..cpment and ;;eneral overlay district location criteria. Staff report by Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, and Rick Marks, Associate Planner. ORDINANCE NO. 193 (first reading,) • A:: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0217 OF THE ,RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE CREATING A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT. Mayor b:ikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the pub L'c hearing was closed. Mayor Xikels went over his concerns. He felt this was premature before the Administrative Cuidelines are produced; therefore, he did not really 'know what they wou'i be approving. He would like to see the approval of those Administrative Guidelines by the city council be added. The heart of what they wc,:ld be approving would be in those guidelines. For example, on page 55 of the ,,ends, item 2, the overlay district location requirements -- states that land use must be compatible with the living environment required by senior citizens is mentioned in proximity to medical facilities. Again, item 5 states that the immediate surrounding area must be free from serious health safety or noise problems. He had a hard time understanding what this means and where this District could be located with these guidelines. He felt this shculd be continued until they have the full guidelines. Mr. Dahl asked what "fast tract processing" meant? Mr. Beadle said the process is establishing a review schedule. As soon as the develoement is submitted to the city, the city can provide the applicant a review schedule. • It doesn't. abbreviate the process, but setting a schedule for the prject if it is adequate, meets all the conditions, it can go through this process. Mr. Dahl stated he felt this should be done for every development which come to the City and not just senior citizen housing. Mr. Frost stated he did not understand Mr. Beedle's answer. Mr. ;!arks stated that if all the initial submittals are complete, then this project would go ahead of others in order to move it through the process quickly. The theory being that time is money. If we can process this quickly, then it is possible for the applicants to keep the cost of the rents down. The city gets the benefit of reduced rent schedules for senior citizens, and the developer gets the benefit of having the project move quickly through the review process. Mayor Mi'r.els stated: (1) There has to be a effective way to monitor such agreements. (2) He had problems looking at the two projects coming before them. They are only looking at a very small portion of the total units for senior ;. He did not want to beef up incentives when housing wasn't entirely for seniors. Mr. Fro,', surtgested "fact tracking" should be eliminated and call it "prior:'.y" instead. Council concurred with this. Mr. Iraq ;l:c rty stated the developer agreements provides on part of a developer .tome assurance that a project once begun will be allowed to continue regard^., l a of N;,tn e in administration. It does provide the City some assurance of some controls which you would not otherwise be able to impose are enforceable. A development agreement is a document which will be negotiated in each individual ease within the broad guidelines of the authorizing ordinance. Once that development agreement is entered into, then the development agreement is recorded with the County Recorder. Its provisions • are of record, and it would have the provisions which State law requires. It be reviewed annually to determine whether or not the provisions are being complied with. Mayor b'ikels asked if there is a law for remedies for non- compliance or do they have to be entered into each agreement anew? What kind of remedies can we seek? Mr. Dougherty stated one of the remedies of non - compliance would be a contractural remedy that would allow the city upon violation to go into court to seek to enjoin in any violation and would also provide for the recovery of the costs and attorney's fees in the event the city were put to that effort. All "is would be in the development agreement itself. Mr. Buquet wanted to see more specific senior citizen projects and not combined with other projects. Mr. Dahl concurred. He felt that with the utilization of the density bonus, with the ability to reduce on -site parking, and with the waiver of some of the fees he did not feel there was any need for additional incentives to convince a developer to build senior citizen projects. He felt the prioritizing of projects did not due any favor for the rest of the developments in the City. Mayor Mikels stated he wanted to be able to see definitions and criteria located on the General Plan and see where they could go. Also, wanted to see the Administrative Guidelines approved by the City Council. • IM. Buquet strongly emphasized that all units within a development be for seniors and not combine housing with other types of units. Mr. Beed'_e stated they will bring this back with some options for council's , consideration. Mr, Dougherty stated what council has suggested would require considerable change to the ordinance, and it may have to be referred back to the Planning Commission first. It is required that if Council makes changes in any area that was not considered by the Planning Commission, the item must be referred back to them for consideration. He felt it would be best if staff would draft an amended ordinance and run it through the Planning Commission before bringing it to the Council. Mayor Mikels requested that the draft be given to the Council at the same time. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to continue first reading to April 6th in order to give staff time to draft the ordinance changes and to take it to the Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels called a recess at 9:25 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:50 p.m. with all .members of Council and staff present. • *400 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 03-01 - GALMARK. A • request to amend the general plan land use plan from medium -high residential (14 -24 dwelling units /acre) to high residential (24 -30 dwelling units /acre) for the development of 161 affordable senior citizen apartments on approximately 4.55 acres of land located west of Archibald, north of Base Line APN 202- 151 -34. (Related file: PD 83 -01). Staff report by Michael Vairin, Senior Planner. RESOLUTION N0. 83 -26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED LAND USE PLAN OF THE RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA GENERAL PLAN. Council concurred in continuing this item to the March 16, 1983 meeting. See motion under under item F, F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83 -01 (PARCEL MAP 7827) - CALPIARK. A change of zone fro^i R -3 (multiple- family residential /planned development) to R -3 1SO (multiple family residential /senior overlay) and the development. of 269 apartment units, of which 161 are intended for senior citizens, on 9.78 acres generally located west of Archibald, north of Base Line - Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5792 - APN 202- 151 -34. (Related File: GPA 83- 03). Staff report by Michael Vairin, Senior Planner. • ORDINANCEE NO. 194 (first reading) .4;. - SA)10E THE CI:'i :70U.`:CIi, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ZOA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202- 151 -34, DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 7827 AND LOCATED WEST OF ARCHIBALD, NORTH OF BASE LINE FROM R -3 /PD TO R -3i50. Notion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to continue items E and F to April 6, 198',. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Councilman Frost suogeoted that Covncii look very closely at those two items. G. ENVIRONTIEN'TAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -06 - TENTATIVE TRACT 12320 - LAfi. A charge cf zone from -3 -'L (multiple family resid- ntial) to R- 3 /PD (muiti.p'.e family residential /planned development) and the development of 116 condominiuno on 8.98 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Avenue - APN 202- 181 -07. Staff report by Michael Vairin, Senior Planner. RECC! ^Y.F ^. 'Af 'LO N: The Planning Commission recommends approve of the zone change (PD 92 -06) to R -3 /PD and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting, for public hearing. There being no response, tho public hearing was closed. Councilman Dahl stated there was a standing water problem behind the mobilehome park by the railroad track. He felt the eastern portion of the track drains into the standing water. C Mr. Hubbs stated the water flow from this project would be to Ramona, under • the railroad tacks, and on toward Base Line. Mr. Frost asked if the artist renderings were as the project went to the Planning Conmission or after ,it came back from the Planning commission. He was concerned about the straight line placement along the street. Mr. Robinson read the title of Ordinance No. 195. ORDINANCE NO. 195 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CJCMAONOA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 161 -07, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND VICTORIA AVENUES FROM R -3 -T TO R -3 /PD. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mayor Mikels set second reading of Ordinance No. 195 for March 16, 1983. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. Item Was deferred from the k'ebruary 10, 1903 city council meeting. lne Glty of San Bernardino has requested our community Join in opposition to a proposal advocated by the County of San Bernardino which would amend the Municipal Organization Act to permit the detachment or removal from a City without the specific permission of the r,,unbicipality's governing body. Staff report by Jim Robbinson, Assistant City Manager. RECOMMENnATIO`J: It is recommended that the City Council send letters opposing the amendment of the Muneipal Organization Act. Mr. Buquet stated if it is q case of support, h_ would go with those Who vote ,or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or in other words with the County. Mr. Schlosser stated he agreed with that. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Dennin Johnson, member of the incorporation committee for Highland. He stated most of the cities have either voted in support of them or remained neutral. After considerable discussion, Council made the following determinations: 0 (Ant ion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to support the incorporation • efforts of the residents of Highland for self determination. Debate between Council followed reparding this issue. tip • Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to close debate. Motion carried unanimoulsy 5 -0. Moticn by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to support the incorporation efforts of the residents of Highland for self determination passed by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser NOES: None ABSENT; None ABST. "•INED: Frost, Mikels 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS A. PROPERTY TAX REFUND. New State legislation requires cities to reimburse couties when the cities are rpresented by county counsel in property tax refund actions. Staff report by City Attorney, Robert Dougherty. RF.COMMF.NDATION: It is recommended by our city attorney that a resolution be adopted providing for defense of property tax refund actions by the County Counsel. Under the Revenue and Taxation Code Section 5149, the City would be required to pay its pro rata cost of the defense. After a lengthy discussion as to whether Council desired to use the services of the County, the following motion was made: Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 83-25 and to waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mr. Robinson read the title of Resolution No. 83 -25. RESOLUTION NO. 83-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`10CGA, CALTFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS ITS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS FOR :1C'; TONS UNDER THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCY. Mayor Mikels announced that the Counril had received a letter from the Chairman of the Planning jok Commiosion, Jeff F.ing, of his intent, to resign effective March 10, Mr. Mikels IF asked "pun -,il how they wished to proceed with the filling of this vacancy. Mr. Dahl stated he, would like to see the issue resolved by March 16 since there were a number of important issues coming before the Planning Commission. Mr. Dougherty pointed out we will have to pay our share of the services of the • County Counsel for defending property taxes. He recommended we approve the Resolution. It would not seem feasible for anyone else doing this for the City anI duplicate efforts. After a lengthy discussion as to whether Council desired to use the services of the County, the following motion was made: Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 83-25 and to waive full reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mr. Robinson read the title of Resolution No. 83 -25. RESOLUTION NO. 83-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`10CGA, CALTFORNIA, DESIGNATING THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS ITS AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS FOR :1C'; TONS UNDER THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCY. Mayor Mikels announced that the Counril had received a letter from the Chairman of the Planning jok Commiosion, Jeff F.ing, of his intent, to resign effective March 10, Mr. Mikels IF asked "pun -,il how they wished to proceed with the filling of this vacancy. Mr. Dahl stated he, would like to see the issue resolved by March 16 since there were a number of important issues coming before the Planning Commission. After cons'derable discussion, Council concurred that each Councilman should is interview any applicant and allow a consensus of appointment be made by the mayor. Council directed that any applicant interested to indicate their desire to the mayor or council on or before March 11 at 1:00 p.m. That all applications to be done formally, and no nomination will be considered after March 11 at 1:00 p.m. in order to give staff time to copy and assemble them with the agenda. 8. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn to a special meeting on Friday, March 4, 1983, at 9:00 a,m. in the Administration Conference Room to approve the Redevelopment Purchase Contracts. Meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk • • v �. • April 11, 1903 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meeting An adourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on Monday, April 11, 1983 in the Lions Park Community Center, 9151 Base Line Road. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present .were: City Council members: Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buouet II, Phillip D. Sch_osser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present ware: City Manager, Lauren. M. Wasserman; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Rick Gomez; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Planners Tim Beadle and Otto Kroutil. Mayor Mikels made two announcements 1. Flood Insurance was still available to those in the flood plan who wished to obtain it. 2. There was a vacancy on the Parks Advisory Committee since Jim Banks had • sutmitted his resignation. Council requested all those interested in apoly:ng to get an application in by 1:00 p.m. on Friday, April 29th. The Position will be filled at the May Lth city council meeting. Y.r. Ree.ile presented an overview of the process involved in the preparation of the Plan, and or. overview of what was contained within the Plan. Mr. Krot:til, project manager, presented a report on the major issues which have seen discussed. Mayer :11ke13 opened the meet4rg for p.ibl-a beans; on issues relating to cirmalation. Acdressing, Council were: Jchn Rl Fnotti, !and owner, questioned where the money was coming from to imla :;ant the streets and to maintain them afterwards. Xr. 1(l:hbs responded that a large part of the circulaticn plan arc existing streets which will be expanded through the development process. The extra dedications and improvements would come with the development of each fronting, property. In are"ss with existing, development, there is the possihility of other t of funding such as Assessment Districts or city funded projects. The primary fr.ndin; source would be the developers. 'Cony 7en2, representing two major property owners and one block of land north of Route 30, east of Etiwanda Avenue, and west of Fast Avenue, requested that the equestrian overlay should be moved back and north some distance from the Route 10 rorridor. Robert Lawrence, property owner, suggested that the interchange of the • Route 30 on East Avenue was necessary and adequate. He concurred that this was a good plan. Andy Barrakian stated that the shopping center at the Devore freeway would create considerable traffic coming from all directions including traffic off the freeway. This center would probably include a major market which would be open late at night and draw .rare traffic than the city '.cants. He recommended a smaller type center at Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line with a smaller market. Betty McKay, land owner, was distressed because of the lack of major east /west streets. With the high school located on Victoria Avenue there should be more east /'west circulation to accommodate the traffic created by those travelling to the high school. David Flccker, land owner, stated that at the last Planning Commission meeting a change was made in the equestrian trail system that came south of the equestrian ara with a linkup with the future trail area in Fontana. He felt it 'was a mistake to remove Alternative 1 as it was presented to the Planni:C Ccmmission. This was replaced with Alternative 3 which created new trails down Etiwanda Avenue connecting with the Victoria Planned Community to the west, and between. Victoria and Route 30 north of the high school, and under the freeway connecting with Fontana to the east. He felt this system was not necessary and brings an equestrian trail through an area where people were not allowed to keep horses. He wanted this go back to Alternative 1. 9an:kc, resident, asked the following: Why make East Avenue worse by putting a major shopping center on it, and Why put an interchange on it? Why do we have to have these at all, and why on East Avenue? There were other suitable places for a shopping center. There were three interchanges within two miles - Deer Creek, Cherry, and Base Line and East Avenue. He felt three were crouch since some communities don't have any. Chief Feuerstein, Foothill Fire District, asked if they would be making a decision on this tonight. He said their staff had made some recommendations, but had done so from outdated materials. Mayor Mikels assured him there would be several other hearincs. Joe ';'hite, a resident, felt that if you look at where people live, shop, and wort, then council should go back to the bypass road. It would be better for rhn h'. �h school to get the kids east and west. The bypass would be the best plan. The bypass would get people where they need to go without impactin ✓, tho rest of the City. It would be immediately west of the high school, ind 'would benofit those travelling to and from the high school. He did net see the need for two neighborhood shopping centers within such a close proximity. lie felt the one planned off Highland Avenue next to the wash would • better ;crve the people in the north and northeast part of the city. Ultimately something will be put up there to serve those people. Y • Mary Catania, property owner, favored the widening of East Avenue and not the bypass because she felt the City should be obligated to the people on East Avenue to fulfill what someone else had planned. Some people say they don't want four 'lanes on East Avenue, but some people have had to do that and have alread ;v nail for it. There should be some obligation to continue what some other Co•anci,l started. Alex Catania, property owner, felt the bypass road was rather close to East Avenue. He was opposed to the bypass. If they had to have the bypass cutting through his property, then the zoning should be at least "M" to compensate for the road. Nei; Westlotorn, resident, did not feel the Plan did the community any service at all. In fact, it did exactly what they did not want. lie felt it impacted the heart of Et Rwanda. He said the Planning Commission had no representative from Etiwanda on it; something which he has always opposed. Ruben Bermudez, resident, stated he favored the Plan with the bypass road. it would destroy the community to widen East Avenue. Ray Trujillo, resident and Advisory Committee member, felt we could have saved o•arselves a lot of time, effort, and money by eliminating the committee in the first place because we are back to zero. He did not want the bypass road eliminated. He felt the bypass would provide a rapid way to get people • in and out of the community. He felt an access to the high school should be considered. Mrs. leinman, property owner, expressed that a street next to the high school was not a good idea. She felt we would have the same type of problems as we do at Alta Loma High School with a main road next to the high schcol. She felt we are not looking far enough ahead and should plan for the freeway interchan ±e at "cast Avenue. Alex Catania, property owner, added to his other statements that if Council does consider the bypass road, then when they increase the zoning around the hvrass, then don't take the zoning away from other landowners in other area; in order to increase the zoning around the bypass. Larry Arcinage, property owner, concurred that there were not enough east /west streets, lie was in favor of the bypass road and any additional east /west roads that would be planned for. Car: .Shacklett, resident, concurred with Mrs. Me Nay regarding the high school and tine traffic. We must be. looking to the future and to needs in general and not to just those who reside in a particular area. Ile felt the Plan or clo:,ir.; Victoria should be changed. Clara Murillo, resident, felt there was a need for both East Avenue and the byy,ss road in order to service all the traffic which will be created by the residents in the future. She also elaborated that Fontana may be funm;l :n¢ students into the new high school also. Hobert, Bruce, of Alta Loma, .stated that there was a direct correlation between freeway accesses and crime. Crime goes up in Proportion with the 1 Liz Allerton, resident, was in favor of the bypass road and did not like •, • number of freeway accesses. He felt council may want to reevaluate the fourth access. Wayne Blanton, Uoland, opposed the improvements being completed on just the south side of 24th Street. He felt the people on the north side should have to pay for half of the improvements. Betty McNay stated that when,, the flood control goes in there would be land available to put in another bypass. Robert Lawrence stated that the number of access points were necessary. How can this help but get people in and out of the Etiwanda area. Theres always a problem with a lack of accesses. Mrs. Kleinman asked if Victoria Avenue is going through? Mr. Hubbs said that a tract map has been finalized which does not contemplate Victoria going through. Mrs. Kleinman felt that this street should go through and wondered if this could be changed? David Flocker, representing the Etiwanda Landowners Association, approved of the changes made by the Planning Commission to add the access to Route 30. He said it was not a question of how many accesses there were in Etiwanda, but how many there were on Route 30. Adding this access would prevent surface travel through Etiwanda to the only other access at Day Creek. The Landowners Association was opposed to the bypass road because it was unnecessary and costly. • Marie Silva, resident, objected to the placement of the trails system. It is not fair to put a trail along a road with existing homes. If they don't have enough room in front, it would put horses close to their homes. Trails should be placed in areas that can be developed around homes that allows for horses. Pat Geartard, resident, wanted to keep the traffic away from the core of Etiwanda. She felt this circulation plan was a mess. She had heard that it would not be any more expensive to put in a new bypass road than to widen East Avenue. Ray Trujillo felt that because of the size of the area, the question is not how the streets are going to be paid for, but when it should be done. He felt it is imperative that the bypass road be built while the number of people affected by it is minimal. Presently, it would not require more than one or two homes to be moved. Rick Elias, resident who lived on East Avenue above Highland, stated for the record he did not like the Plan. With this Plan, there was no core of Etiwanda left. He would like to preserve Etiwanda and votes for the bypass. John %yon, resident, considers circulation the most important part of the Plan. He supports the bypass and was opposed to the route 30 interchange. The id-a :'cr the Etiwanda Specific Plan was to preserve Etiwanda. He felt the • Plan fails to do that. Liz Allerton, resident, was in favor of the bypass road and did not like •, • the Plan without the bypass. There beinr; no further comments on circulation issues, Mayor Mikels closed the Public hearing on this item. ��rwt Xayor Ml keis called a recess at 9:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:15 P.M. with all members of Council and staff present. • +ex• Mayor MS!<eis stated that the Specific Plan Advisory Committee was appointed by the City Council. Their recommendation went to the Planning Commission. The Planning Ccmmission made some revisions to that Plan. The Plan is now before the City Council. It will be the City Council who will approve and adopt the final Plan. The Council will take into account the ree ommenda t ions made by the Specific Plan Advisory Committee, the Planning Commission, and from the comments made before Council now. Mayor Mikels stated that other meetings will be necessary and felt the Council should set those meetings so people will know what to expect. Council_ set: Thursday, April 21, at 7:00 p.m. in the Lions Park Community Center for •the next public hearing date. Tuc :;day, May 17, at 7:00 p.m. in the Lions ?ark Community Center for ano`. i -r date if necessary. Final consideration at the regular city council meeting of Wednesday, May 18, 7:00 p.m. in the Lions Park Community Center. Mayer Mikels requested that staff present a report on commercial locations under the land use portion of the Plan. Otto Kroutil presented the Plan as approved oy the PLannina Commission which included two ten acre centers -- one at Base Lire and East Avenue and one at ,ant. Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Also included were several smaller type chopping areas scattered throughout the planning area, Both centers are located on East Avenue since there are only two ^ajor north /south streets in the planning area. One is Etiwanda Avenue and tho other East Avenue. In try Lng to reduce traffic on Etiwanda Avenue as much as possible, the only other north /south street was East Avenue. There is a possibility of a third cite located !it 24th Street. Presently it is designated as a minor site, but with a provi.:ion if development occurs north of 24th Street, then that site cculd be considered for another shopping center. Mayor Mike15 opened the public, hearing to those wishing, to comment on the commercial locations. Addressing Council wore: .John Bignotti felt, a shopping, center would be, more appropriate at the corner across from the Regina Cafe since the winds were no bad in that area. 15 Felt that this would improve the traffic and appearance of the area which • borders Fontana. Jim Banks, resident, stated most of the people in Etiwanda did not want any commercial at all, in fact most indicated they preferred driving to other areas to shop. He felt that the Plan puts a lot of commercial into the south end of Etiwanda. When the upper area begins to build, we will end up with just what everyone wanted to avoid. He felt we should strike the commercial at the f^ceway and Base Line because this center has no redeeming value. It will be only a appendage to the freeway and have no aethestic value at all. When the Vf ctoria Planned Community centers are added, then there will be too much commercial overlapping. He felt we should end speculation and get some o:` it out of there or at least to develop some method to control the rate at which it is developed so that we don't have a brand new ghost town throughout Etiwanda. They don't want big block buildings by the freeway. If you could delete the Center at Base Line and the freeway and the one which is out of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by the winery, then go ahead and put a smaller one at Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line. As long as it is small and blends in, he would trade two large centers for one small ore. Mrs. Kleinman wanted to draw attention to a piece of property which is bounded by the railroad on the north, the freeway on the east, and by East Avenuc; this is an odd triangular spot of about ten acres. This type of property would be more wisely used for commercial. Presently it is zoned "M ", Bay Trujillo felt that if we have commercial, then it should be situate; • so that i`, benefits the community. It should be put at the north at 24th Street a.... :t %oothiil and East Avenue. This will disperse traffic to the north and sto the south. A commercial center at East Avenue and Foothill would �na:<c a good entrance to the community. Larry .lrcir.age stated no was in favor of a shopping center at East Avenue and Foothill Bo, :levard. This would not impact the core of E- Wanda, create an entrance to t'ne City of Rancho Cucamonga, and will keep traffic from Fontana coming into the city. If we don't allow for one here, then probably the City of Fcntana would be nutting one in since it will be a major street. This would take tax dollars away from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Andy Barmakian presented an architects rendering of a shopping center which could be a solution for the corner of Etiwanda and Base Line. It will have a more rural design and would be a smaller shopping center than the larger center proposed at East ,Avenue and Foothill. A similar one, Christian Farmers : ?nrket, is located along the 57 freeway in Diamond Bar. The design is their interpretation of this market and would answer the needs of the oommunity in respect to keeping the traffic problems down, keeping the size of the facility down, creating a rural look to that corner, and eliminating a problem of trying to design a residential facility at a corner which will be impacted by two lanes of left turning, traffic off Etiwanda onto Base Line. This situation is created at the Montclair Shopping Center on Moreno with a left turn into the shopping center at Broadway and May Company. Their type of • design would create less vehicular traffic per day. John Lyon stated he would support the Barmakien proposal if council would delete icme of the other designations, • Joe 'White felt that with the regional shopping center located at Etiwanda and Foot'r.ill, then how could the other smaller centers support themselves. He ._ -t people would rather shop at the regional center. Nei! Iest'otorn stated at Foothill and East Avenue a plan had beer, present ^.d to preserve the trees at this location. He felt this was a good plan. Bob Lawrence reco=,ended that everyone should remember this i.s a plan for what Etiwanda will be in the future, not what it is now. There te'..ng no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing on this item. Mayor Mi'.:als requested staff present the report on the Residential Land Use Desicnat:.cns. Otto Kroati', presented the report. He stated the Plan as proposed by the Planninv Commission proposed residential uses from one dwelling unit per acre to 14 dwellings per acre. The lowest intensity residential uses are .found north of Route 30 and portions of the core area. • Mayor 'U kels opened the meeting to land use issues. Addressing Council were: Tony Zenz, representing more than 120 acres of the 140 in the 'block, stated that an "V' designation would 'as better along Route 30 than a "VL" designation. This would make a better buffer. No "VL" has been used along 1- 19 as a buffer. Mayne Blanton felt you would not want to leave all 20,000 square foot lots neat to a freeway. He would like to see a similar program adopted as in Alta Loma with a graduated scale going north of the freeway. He would like to have so'e 10,000 up to 1/2 acre lots. Din% Var,derhoo°, property owner of seven acres north of Route 30 and east of Rost ;venue, wanted to support the comments that there should be a buffering zone along both sides of Route 30 -- either an "L" or "LM" de.nignation. Mon Ri;notti, representing six acres at Miller and Etiwanda Avenue, felt the ,:111 and "Lt4" are not compatible for that area since they are on the other aide of the freeway. There is no designation for apartments or condominiums which is the buffer zone from Foothill up to the freeway. He felt a complex in cluster- be more appropriate, with a higher designation - at least 20 -24 dw,,ili.nvc per acre. 7 Mrs. ratania address the "ER" zoning, stating thin zoning, wasn't in the :, ^m^�nl plan, no roll this area world be unmarketable since there is a park on , water tower- on the other side, and small lots and houses it in the too midd 1c, hi,so thn lend had no character for expensive homes -- was Nat. 7 • Mr. Catania, owner of property in the "ER" area. Half of his property is zoned "VL", the other half in "ER". He felt trying to develop an area with two different designations would be difficult. If Council is going to keep the "ER" none, then could they consider reducing it in size to exclude both halves of his property. James Thompson, owner of 25 acre parcel near the flood control channel (highway 30 to the north, flood control to the south, channel running to the east) feels that the "L" designation is not adequate and requested it be put back to the "LM" designation. Jim Banks strongly urged consideration of the lightest designations possible in all of Etiwanda. He also called attention to a housing tract south of Foothill. He did not like the Planning Commission's decision _n making this an industrial park surrounding the housing tract. Mrs. Kleinman stated two areas west of the freeway on the south side of Victoria designated as "L". She felt this area should be a higher designation with the freeway 30 feet above it and running the entire length of it. She felt there should be something higher along the freeway aide graduating to a lower density along East Avenue. Mr. Lawrence felt that we needed to zone along freeway communsurate with a good buffering philosophy. Chief Feuerstein stated that the area north of Route 30 is a very high . fire hazard area, and Council should take this into consideration. Clark Shocklett, property owner of 10 acres at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Miller, addressed the area at 1 -15, East Avenue, and Footnill Boulevard. Be suggested that since there is a diversity of densities and in the interest of uniformity, he suggested that density be made the same in the whole area. Mr. Lawrence, owner of property along the Southern Pacific Railroad, felt that buffering warrants consideration there since the property is locked in against the railroad tracks. He also felt densities were too low to be practical. The need was to have affordable housing. Bob Flocker addressed the "L" and "VL" densities in the Plan. He. felt it was excessive. In particular, he addressed the area south of Route 30, west of East Avenue, and north of Base Line. He felt the "VL" should become "V'. Pat Gerhart expressed her resentment in the development of the City. Mr. Rink; felt that the main issue was Profits versus Privacy. Mr. Trujillo stated that when the Victoria Planned Community with the higher densities was approved, they were under the impression that it would protect the Etiwanda area. 'While growth is inevitable, they are concerned about the intensity of that growth. • ' "r. Nestlotorn addressed the issue of the commitment the Etiwanda residents feel was made to them when they agreed to the development of the • Victoria Planned Community with such high density. They were led to believe that they could expect some support from the City for low development in- the area we are now talking about. Mike Perez, resident, felt the lower density made a better place where people would want to live and stay. There being no further comments, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing on land use issues. Mayor Mikels called a recess at 10:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:55 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present. :',ever Mikels stated that the meeting was now open to address issues unrelated to land use and circulation. Addressing Council were: Mark Schipold, representing the Myohoji Temple, stated they were concerned about the area being harmonized with the temple. They were concerned in particular with the "OP" designation to the south. They were concerned that 2 or 3 story buildings would be built that could overlook into their rectory. • He suggested that a 35 foot side yard Duffer be placed between their property and at least the "OP" designation. Chief Feuerstein stated that the Fire District was concerned that some kind of fire plan be provided for fire services. They would like a schedule be established of when services and facilities would be needed and to include methods of financing of such facilities and services. David Flocker stated that Section 5.4, Special Regulations, has very specific requirements on windrows. He felt the City would be creating an unenforceable ordinance. Who would be examining the trees to insure watering. Also, who would be maintaining them. He felt this should be examined again to be sure its feasible. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Xotion: : ,loved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to adjourn the meeting to an Executive Session regarding pending litigation, not to reconvene this evening, but to reconvene on Tuesday, April 19, 7:00 p.m. at the Rancho Cucamonga Library to discuss Route 30. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. The next hearing for the F.tiwanda Specific Plan will be. April 21, 19" at 7:00 p.m. is Respectfully submitted, " 0,, - I I RR&7 rITY Fri' WAAP I V11 1 11•`37 7111 A, If V1 I T It I 10 °6l r'a l 71',11 11471 sL111 1'[14 11 1 .1 'Ar,- 111.7 1151 [1 1!1•`.1'1 r'1 K \: S: •+ 1'L :1nA {I.1Y Yr .'.I.T 1017 PS'1 M: 1017, !^•'; -,YS I9571 1111 1 S11 11 1 C1'D%TY 461- Pa v r I, j ii 'TV SFTVIfT L v 7 NAY t ^51.1 Cu: I 1"Y ':F -A ru "'I': I t I VIE Ll ""'SlIrl I" - " M—ITT 0 14 Cr N F C P L 11 I R I F 1' C I At il5', 41, rillt" I I 1711 'i , . ". t FOE • o {A I ION I u I ""IM"' SYS 111731 1 L I K -.11 -5, 21 '. FIT i'T, i 11' �IILS L'ASSDC, PICIIARD 7-01 7G41 r1l fr'P fA JOURNAL 1 ]95M1 1A. Tllfr.�l T�T�l TO TJI I I e11 At I CI✓INI I,, TI IYS At l6 FY+FAT W'19 Ire—, A I WIK'NT CO ^1 1 FIVIP11, I I PENT AIS I'll, le Ot V, PW 1 113� i I S 0 Ap� IT". 1� 50 F,irtolv, TIM , 0 , 17101 iw ICT 1, Fp's AINIJSTFP 1 1-1 41 7) `151 N: cc ' .1r MP�!T IR sys IF I IS, I —1 I.1 1 r. 111 L IN'll S r,,:, -X, A, I F-91 IA • •4- 4 c", jTTLNG E714-. 2I15 r:i� I'lls C. �ITFR VIST 1115.1 'Ili Ur PRE I P, Fly PIPOPT 17'11' .... .. WF 1 711l , , P.. IT CHARTFP 1 1!151 11" P.. IT S, _14,E I r15i 1111. CN" CLAPA ; . '7 11 L" IT4 1 , 1�1� I f! r A-A, LY')TA I/, 1'1� CIPY74�• 'YlTLF 11'110 1 11 1 K11P1WPFK, VIA-Y 171-0 "l, -,', fy,F11,11�LIAM • RvA, 1715 SW gr;l 0 rIr-Y, HArky i " 4 41n T1.71. C ASSOC 14423 1711.5 6�, m."I'AL TFtFpv.r%F rr 71:711 1111 ':+711.1. JT 11ikl .1 W A PO ANT P I C ONO III ®r.Fj 4/2D/03 R Jf: [P ';A 1 01 scony I I I I I UFT PaOr 0 I •4ARRANT Ptr P.!'CII IATION 4119103 2.8c ,1 n•r[ P 41]•0/91 247.00 1 r`' •.- •• �`.i -:t-.1 rl aAry 5/,6/93 03.64].49 ._ -11 o.:f':O f" 4 /'0 /9i 04.256.49 .,.l. .r `r `LI')FF% 11/2n/13 1118,024.1. 24.60 I'1 +•[ '.n': �•.I. =' CC .u.1 t.%STE 11ch;i 8 I'AV APT ^. P. \1A 4 /aC /d3 21.00 uk% 4 /2n /9i 3J.39 •. /. _Fn•, 32.0 .qlC Z ^ /fll 0, tI x511: 4/11/41 11111 r' I�' ru Ir 11 -14 In 4 /l ^ /A3 11447. 74 i 1' : -:1 II ILIS "' f0 1'• 1.. 1 _pD /.ii 59:.4) . 1 ✓ +l5 p '- IT I,I. ]. eT fOlD 4/20/83 2'.1.12 *.n,I_NFSL lRap 081108 r /?f, /F3 21.39 . -'[ 1•"^ 4/) ^./53 11.58 1'll 1' r 1.t`k 4 /l.^. /HT !UG.CO ni a 1 .:11% :1I':C CO 4/20/53 255.NC 9 1..'Y• fi:1V 4/21;1,1M1 45.61 a.'.` III rf3 .4T. Pry .1 4/29/X1 7!tO.16 19n.r S.r' .II11AO v Sf4Ylp /?9 / ^l Iti ^•i <•_ '/ -,r.. r.l `:4 •; Ul S14V Ifk 4/M/23 p r I " ' ^." 'r:• r; - 10.00 < 4117/ °3 72.96 .aL "r:.r e's 4/zc1e:1 f 0991 Tm Ala 304. 153.47 • • • � r PA6F 2 • .. A M 1 I DISCOUNT Nff In it ' 'lll iYr�til[ D 1 }r - - h1'.n< DI PICT :'KT. 5 5 /]`/P3 IIc / /.. 10 /M3 4 499.00 • 1 `v : 2:0.90 1 4 1 ` 4 /)D /9'. 2 71 r.14 I'�`11 i 411n/H.+ 7 11 611.71 1 •.= t f i'air rIfC1", rk : :/a.1/ty 1 Ie r l IA 1.10 (♦ ! !/+ r l V V I:a:1.'.ar lfe 11 G^ 4 41`^/X1 5 551.56 I r'... • •1 . ...11' 4 4 /'VC1 LiU.CL I i. •- ' '! L LI ll' S 1'.: 4 4 /'r /nl L 5a M155.4N I ).•1• . .1>fv+ / /ol'hn 5 - • 1 ;3 - IT I Id 1 35o.Ck1 1]�':.. r r V -1 • 6/zn/n"1 I Is.cU n I I .• ' C•. f 4/'r/ ^.3 2 2r614.J0 J�r . i5.00 ... %tG'q"1•.� C FG i 92.IM t] „- > >,.� • •-.r_ry •AOK, CIT'I CF 4 4/2C141 t 10.00 • I I:' =r 1 1 -+j . t 9 41111/31 1 35.k13 270.75 i:.:... . .. .V.'= S SI OP /:3 1 130.03 �`3J -L r 4 411':/;3 9 91.63 - / 341.]] I]}'. •, . . ^I - /1.r /F3 3 1114.)5 • - O O i•ia ' 'r " "'111 I':c 4 411t]/al 1 1.293.65 iJ I Ir.',•• r ri5 Tlr. a 1 /110/93 PA6F 2 u I/ lY F rnav M,M...nxr oTr. OJI APPlIG1FON ROR AICOHOTIG e[VIGOe lK[NTEITI L ttPf(SI Of DCENSE(sl fnE NO SFnw'" *1 L,,.nx _ e. MoAmp Add;; (N dirt.rmr f— 51-14-h- vnd Sh- Per,. "Eft °449 re, D.I: -rv-m d u,abalr e....aq. cannN I WI Maod•:T' san Lrrrn cd ]TO OF'i' S,...... °A c '1I >!tl GEOGRAPHICAL Sa,ronnma. CaRI. vS61e v « • v ' • CODE 3615 Doh Th. mdxlyn.d N.41 aPPF.. far nx, drrcr:bd - InIM.: T.mP' hymn U.P. T. NAMEITI Of APPLICANT(S) Applied rr:d- S.<. vdDAA TOR ARCO, IDC. EA -n.. Dor.: lstaancc En.o:.e W. Y. J_ E edroa Ballkclo91n,79 ftk. ]. iTS Of 1PANSACilONS1 FEE TYPE CC'r ___'__ ___ SIGN HERE _______ _______ ----------------- . T100.00 19 ma/ - Garo 2a11kcIGe1u,511Gtk- Per.Tif. 211171.1 D ^r 5txt 4, anDfer I OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A. Nam. al Iw,;n -. C NO[ -Arco CT 21 ADMI S. fxnaon of 5v,nes, -NOmbx and sn.,I AR J-FT FIN 9533 PODthill Blvd. ON aM To Ced. C7q Pwncnn cucpmon,Ia 91730 Bnn alrnablL n ( TOTAL T r p IOC., APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 3/28/83 C... f U STATE Of CALIFORNIA b' a -"' Do V., H'rih ENJP TAu Lin,, Fl, DrPn,finenl 111 very Arh<F.d lr R.,.,ded nnrkA :;�A 3/z4/83 COPIES MARFD --- .--------- .................��...�.! 11 ❑ evn...ol: fn 'GN 0atardl$27.10 3/28/87 el.._......_RAd N .. ..................... _O<. n ....... - ------ N _ ._1.2.8._L.�..2 .�„y.?. -`i:? ! 6. Ifhemi- ,G<envnd. rCiry Om,rp'•�- Y'es 10- 11519:! SFnw'" *1 L,,.nx _ e. MoAmp Add;; (N dirt.rmr f— 51-14-h- vnd Sh- Per,. SA',:' la. No,. To. -n ,aelered ony of IF. pm•Niw. of rM1. AlmM1nb< veer b -n <—IIHI of 0 4 11 Nr I, Conuol Aa or .,.JoRo. al de D.Pammenr qn O mnp to IF. All' 7 • I I E.plvin v'TIE S" nmvr b ih:m 9 or ID en an oxa,Fm wFkF vFall p. d -med pn of IM1iv opplimXan. anI 11 lal IF.I any mnnaga employed in mvvb L[envd Premnev •rHl bo•e all IFe pwLL,vl:em al o II<en old I,, M.eroge Canvel AO. 1], Appleom Ogren A Fe riol1". o rome or perm:, to b. doleZ n.q of II:e _E,, loll of IFe AlroFoli, wall "an 3 /28/83 0ernardino IJ. STATE Of CALIFORNIA 4 of I .n= m. o.,.:..m IA APPLICANT ;(pg ARCO, IiiC. ___'__ ___ SIGN HERE _______ _______ ----------------- . APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 3/28/83 C... f U STATE Of CALIFORNIA b' a -"' Do V., H'rih ENJP TAu Lin,, Fl, DrPn,finenl 111 very Arh<F.d lr R.,.,ded nnrkA :;�A 3/z4/83 COPIES MARFD --- .--------- .................��...�.! 11 ❑ evn...ol: fn 'GN 0atardl$27.10 3/28/87 el.._......_RAd N .. ..................... _O<. n ....... - ------ N _ ._1.2.8._L.�..2 .�„y.?. -`i:? ! C�G.VfeL fi13� vl F�xsr�a,.�r A2co � 95SS Miul -ncno- � xAr,ou 9533 CI 9511 i Foar�llu aLua f i nlc� A ec,o Sn)c 15 Locm7rD 6m a� 'Olne of COo4iiLL 3Lua oA) -chr- `aou EAST s oG Foe7tiiLlI&LuD qua MACACdrrc. Auexve -3, t dI WOT 40,01.UE of e t-bOoelr9 0 -� Gam,"( -PLAU e e&MfnVP.elgL Cumetri &,jujc, c, I#asaceAr�;"7-? S A627 -4 e -Z EAST C -2 5ovfti C -� wesr C -z GEVeML'FGAj° Alb 27-4Aocrr'wIft5rT Ir1f-S7- 0- omme2c,AA h, • • 9 WILLIAM L. SCHROEDER AIWn Yat Law 10666 W v. mm, Ave. M 1 �,de7141638- 04872643 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRr,l10N March 24, 1993 APR G 1983 u► yr 71Si9110illIY21li2i31415�6 City of Rancho Cucamonga and ! Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Department PO Box 807 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucam.orga, Ca, 91730 Attention: City Council and /or City Clerk, County of San Bernardino City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. R:;: Th.. The Natter of the Claim of Ron Vaughn, Alice Vaughn, Christine Vaughn, Claimants v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Department, County of San Bernardino Law Offices of to the City of 8edpr910nt and ^ names and post office address of Ron Vaughn, Alice and Christine Vaughn are as follows: The names are as hereinabove and the post office address is 9633 Calle Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730. William L. Schroeder hereby presents this claim Rancho Cucamonga and Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's County of San Bernardino pursuant to Government 1. The Vauqhn, snt out Vejar, 2. The post office address to which Law Offices of William L. Schroeder desires notice of this claim to be sent is as follora: 10666 Westminster Ave., k1, Garden Grove, Ca. 92643. 3. on December 31, 1982, at 9633 Calle Vejar, Rancho Cucamonga, California, claimants received personal injuries under the following circumstances: Rancho Cucamonga public employees forced their way into claimants' residence without claimants' pnrmis.;ion and physically injured claimant, Alice Vaughn. Claimants were not allowed to leave their home, and were falsely imprisoned. Rancho Cucamonga public employees forcefully and without permission removed claimant, Christine Vaunhn, from the residence and unlawfully held her and questioned her and wrongfully withheld information on Christine Vaughn's where - abouts to claimants Ron Vaughn and Alice Vaughn. In addition, clo imont; were threatened, and claimant, Christine Vaughn, was eallod 3 liar, and, claimant, Ron Vaunhn, was wrongfully accused of molestinn Christine Vaughn. 4. pul,liC employers of Rancho Cucamonga so u; rongfully carried o;t rh,, acts descril•ed in Paragraph No. 3 an to cause in- j.tri,;; ro claimants. Claimant, have sufferod physical injuries, incutn.d nentol suffering and have incurred modical and related 6 0 City of P.ascho Cucamonga and Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Department .`iar ^,h 1981 i %ac.n Two Re: Tr. The Matter of the Claim of Ron Vaughn, Alice Vaughn, Christine 7auahn, Claimants v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho C}:c_•zga Sheriff'& Department, County o =San Bernardino 1XgOn: i. So far as it is known to the Law Offices of Will tam L. Sc:=r ri ^r at the date of filing this claim, Ron Vaughn, A1ic:,, Vacg ".n and Christine Vaughn hay^ incurred damages in the amount of $100,000.00 dui to the following injuries: P!:•:sicr: '. ini,rr ies, mental sufferinq_, medical and related P%. s. 6. Doi% Fernandez, Frod L. Daily, Mike Inaram, and Does 1 through 20 %sere the public employees causing these injuries. i. At the time of presentation Of this claim, Ron Vaughn, • Al ico Vaughn and Chris a. To Vauqhn claim damages in the aount ur S10n,O(; .O0, compcted on the basis of the following: Pair, .,ulfnrirn;, phcsiczl and mental injuries, medical and related expenaes. DATRD: March 24, 1983 ,IYC:sj LAM: OFFICES OF {iILLTAM L. SCHROEDER By � JACOL!LIN£ Y COLB'b'A N, Attorney fnr Claimants I P CLAIM FOR D,v/A1 GE C; INJ' ' 1. Claims to, cacti. , injury to person, or to personal property :no,[ be filed not toter than 1C0 days rafter the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911 .2). Claim: for damages to real property rm,st he filed not later than I year after the occurrcrce ;Gev. Code, Sec. 911.2). TC: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9B0 -3397 29 years Leonard Eucene Bennett, 8267 London Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Ncme of z :aimant Acdress Zip Phone ra- 9330 Baseline Road, Suite 100 c/o Beloud and Mannerino, Attorneys at Law: Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91701 .+d 'dress to r.hich Claimont wishes notices sent. WHEN dic' cc-^-,o or injury occur'? March 14, 1983 dic cam -de or injury occur? Jersey Boulevard at Vincent Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga f1C;! and under v.h,t circumstances did damage or injury occur? Please see attachment_ vr V, HAT - wtiaula: arfion i:•: tae Cih,, or it;. employees, caused tic alleged damage or injury? (Insheir names of pmoloyees, if known' Please see attachment. The name or names of the public employee or employees causinu the injury, damage or loss is unknown to Claimant. V /NAT vim do von l.lm? Include the estimated amount of on- nrosoertfve loss, in,ofor as it may be ::nowa rat the t .. ri Cm rr sa rat o.`ion of this claim, toaathur •aiih th^_' psi; n.` corrput;.tion o: the amount claimed: 2: Anach "Stint"s or i hl ill io, it no ei � p CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Please see attachment, i_ _AOMINISTRe TION S APR 41 -083 5 -- - - - -- - -.� .. - 7j8j9jmtlll�t1j2i3191516 Totni Amrn.nl Claimed: S t:AM! , amt ,... .. itm.;<r.•, Do, l ,i <:' ln,uilol;: o witnesses known It this time. Or.. Turner, Upland San Antonio Community Hospital March 30, 1983 art ^ /p•.,:1 / Si .outi: r., nr fl -;, •, .'t'j Attachment to Claim for Damage or Injury of Leonard Eugene Bennett . on !larch 14, 1983, Claimant was driving his vehicle easterly on Jersey Boulevard at Vincent Avenue, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, when his vehicle plunged into an unguarded and unmarked area of public street which had been trenched by the City of Rancho Cucamonga creating a dangerous condition of public highway, proximately causing personal injury of and damage to claimant's property within the meaning of Government Code Section 835, subsections (a) and (b). Said dangerous condition created a reasonably forseeable risk of the kind of injury and damage which occurred. The City of Rancho Cucamonga had constructive and /or actual notice of the dangerous condition as the same had been created by said City and not adequately repaired nor had . barricades or warning devices been erected. In so far as is known at the time of presentation, claimant received personal injuries to his head, lip, ribs and chest ar.d his Ford pickup truck was damaged. In so far as is known at the time of presentation on this claim, cLaimint'.5 r:amages are as follows: Medical expenses (continuing) $ 2,477.55 i,oss of earning capacity, in excess of: 459.35 Property damage (estino ted) 3,085.00 Loss of Use (CMIt inninn) 225.00 General damages 100,000.00 • TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN'O. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that CARL N. BRADY whose address 12 is 7740 Eastwood Street, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 claims 13 14 damages from the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and the COUNTY OF •15 SAN BERNARDINO in the amount computed as of the date of 16 presentation of this claim in the sum of $1,022,500,00. 17 This claim is based on losses arising from the wrongful 18 death of claimant's wife, RUTH ELAINE BRADY, and personal 19 injuries to claimant which occurred on or about the 27th day 20 of February, 1983, at the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA under the 21 fallowing circumstances: Claimant and his wife were traveling in a wasterly direction on San Bernardino Road in a 1964 Ford automobile and while attempting to cross Hellman Avenue, said vehicle was swopt out of control and down Hellman Avenue by droininq flood waters where it reached a paint where it became totally suhmergnd. In attempting I.o save themselves, claimant 27 sustained personal injurias and his wifft was drnwnPd, which 26 Ppi:; o rde wa, a ditr r and pr axlmn tP r0s 111 It to " the cell I igence C1 `. e.f> �Z BELOW (SPACE FOR FILING P ONLY 1 LAW OFFICES 2 • PEACH, SHAPIRO @ PEACH A LAW CORPORATION (B y� a Irk y ¢ b V 505 NO ARROWHEAD AVENUE V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3 SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 95401 ADMINISTRATION (7I4I BB9 -0471 4 veal ea -7414 APR 14 03 5 ATTORNEYS FOR Claimants 8191AIll11211�3g 6 7 CLAIM FOR WRONGFUL DEATH AND PERSONAL INJURIES !under Government Cade Section 910) a TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN'O. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that CARL N. BRADY whose address 12 is 7740 Eastwood Street, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 claims 13 14 damages from the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and the COUNTY OF •15 SAN BERNARDINO in the amount computed as of the date of 16 presentation of this claim in the sum of $1,022,500,00. 17 This claim is based on losses arising from the wrongful 18 death of claimant's wife, RUTH ELAINE BRADY, and personal 19 injuries to claimant which occurred on or about the 27th day 20 of February, 1983, at the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA under the 21 fallowing circumstances: Claimant and his wife were traveling in a wasterly direction on San Bernardino Road in a 1964 Ford automobile and while attempting to cross Hellman Avenue, said vehicle was swopt out of control and down Hellman Avenue by droininq flood waters where it reached a paint where it became totally suhmergnd. In attempting I.o save themselves, claimant 27 sustained personal injurias and his wifft was drnwnPd, which 26 Ppi:; o rde wa, a ditr r and pr axlmn tP r0s 111 It to " the cell I igence C1 0 a 9 10 11 12 13 20 21 22 23 24 25 of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, their agents and employees in failing to post any signs warning ' of the dangerous conditions present at said intersection; and.in designing the flood control system in that area in such a manner so as to create such a dangerous condition. The injuries sustained by claimant as far as known at this time consist of abrasions, contusions and bruises over his en- tire body. DAMAGES Personal Injuries Medical Expenses $2,000.00 Wage Loss $3,000.00 General Damages $15,000.00 Car Damage Wrongful Death of Wife 1 Funeral and Burial Expenses $2,500.00 Pecuniary Losses $1,000.000.00 Total $1,022,500.00 Total amount claimed as of date of presentation of this claim is $1,022,500.00. All notices or other communications with regard to this claim should he sent to claimants attorneys, PEACH, SHAPIRO 5 PEACH, at 505 North Arrowhead Avenue, Suite 301, San Bernardino, California 92401. DATED; April 13, 1983 PEACH, SHAPIRO h PEACH A Law Corporation H Y • .L ✓NHAL��A�� Attorneys for Claimants r� V • 10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer CL �CAAf �— OtC9 v > 1977 BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Street Striping and Pavement Marking Services Nine bids were received in response to advertising for the City's annual striping services contract for 1983 -84. The low bidder was Pacific Striping of Hacienda Heights at $29,781. The bids ranged to a high of $46,231. Amounts of the previous basic contracts have been about $25,000 each year. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the contract be awarded to Pacific Striping, the lowest qualified bidder, for $29,781. fully subTitted, Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • CONTRACT FOR STREET STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKING SERVICES This Agreement made and entered into this 1st day of May, 1983, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, herein referred to as "City ", and PACIFIC STRIPING, herein referred to as "Contractor ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires to provide for street striping and pavement marking services through a contract, with an independent contractor, and received bids for said services; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is advantageous and in the best interest of the City to enter this Agreement for the • retention of said services; and WHEREAS, the City has determined the contractor to he the lowest responsible bidder for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. This Agreement includes and embodies all provisions, terms, conditions and requirements of those specifications incorporated herein as Exhibit "A ". SECTION 2. The terms of the Agreement shall be for the period of May 1, 1983 through June 30, 1984, unless sooner terminated in accordance with Exhibit "A ", Section III K. SECTION 3. The contractor hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, transportation, labor and materials necessary to perform these tasks as specified in Exhibit "A ". Pursuant to Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2 of the Labor Code of the State of California or local laws thereto • applicable, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has ascertained the h • general prevailing rates for legal holiday and overtime work in the locality of which this work is to be performed for each craft, classification or type of workman needed to execute contracts for public works. Pursuant to Section 1773 of the Labor Code, the general prevailing rates of wages in the City of Rancho Cucamonga have been determined and these are listed in the California Department of Transportation publication General Prevailing Wage Rates effective on the date of this contract. SECTION 4. Payment shall be made to the contractor upon completion of the work, to the satisfaction of the City, and to the requirements of the attached specifications at the proposed unit prices on a monthly basis, SECTION 5. The contractor promises and agrees to hold harmless the City and its agents, from any and all claims or demands, actions or causes of action of any kind or nature • whatsoever arising hereunder; and the contractor further promises and agrees to furnish to the City a policy of insurance issued by a reputable insurance company in the sums stated in Exhibit "A ", Section III B. SECTION 6. It is agreed that should the contractor fail to perform or otherwise breach any of the provisions of this contract and fail to cure said within thirty (30) days after written notice is given him, that the City may terminate this Agreement, In the event that the City terminates this Agreement, then the contractor shall have no further rights hereunder; and the City can then undertake to provide said service under this Agreement by force account, contractor or otherwise, and apply the performance bond posted by the contractor in accordance with this Agreement, to rover all costs and expenses which the City may incur in providing such services. SECTION 7. The service of written notice to the parties hereto shall be by personal service or shall be deposited in the United States Mail, postage propaid and addressed as follows: City Engineer Pacific Striping City of Rancho Cucamonga 3404 Turnbull P. 0. Box 501 Hacienda Heights, CA Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 V Such service shall be deemed service or as of the date of SECTION 8. The contract or lease any part or portion written approval of the City III. given as of the date of personal • deposit into the United States 'fail. )r shall not transfer, assign, sublet of the Agreement without prior Council per Attachment "A ", Section SECTION 9. It is agreed that this contrat shall be binding on and shall inure to the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns. SECTION 10. This contract shall be subject to the provisions of all laws of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California. IN WITNESS WHEREOF: The parties hereto, on the day and year first written above, have executed this Agreement in counter parts. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PACIFIC STRIPING ATTEST: y Ller APR07E0 AS TO CONTENT: Lloyd 3. Hobbs, City Engineer )4l \J • CITY OF 0 CUCAM.ONGA • SIP: ":RY OF PROPOSALS OPENED %+O l'- W,.i -. it ;nn tr.¢t far Tr361tc Stn0in9 L N........ nt F", ki.Ng DATE: April 5, 1933 _:ltl "•: Z'ty u'ea CONTRACT NO. Consley b X"nti9::y Cote Park Inc. J. 6 S. Sign Mathis Const. Orange ..P. StriV,n9 Pacific Striping II_P; 7S.NT(Titi 3i0 g. -=i F 810 =.'4X0 BID AMOUNT BID A+'OUNT 810 :10Jt6 fPJ AMOUNT 1. 1 t .. " _ s •1,560.00 1. : .� � n :. 3• VIM, L.F. .:123 9,280.00 .021 ?,668.110 .021 7,560.00 .035 [2,600.00 ,1)2 7,200.00 .02 7,200.00 b. 4' -.,:,l 01,090 L.'. .929 2,465.00 .06 5,100.00 .045 3,325.00 .06 5,100.00 .05 4,250.00 .04 3,400.00 c. T„a 4 3.3- Ages 5 ?.OJO L.F. .,195 6,460.00 .14 9, 520. DO .105 7,140.00 .19 12,240.0 .095 6,450.00 .09 b, 120.00 J. " ;11.4 L'^ 1 1,7 ") L.F. .10 170.00 .12 104.00 .08 136.OD .12 204.00 .08 136.00 .00 136.00 _. Ste,:c0e - Q"]"t "' a. 3' L-t, 1,40' :_t, 3.90 5,450.00 225 3,150.00 2.50 3,500.00 3.00 4,200.00 4.00 5,600.00 1.75 2,450.00 6. L +:t 2 -v 1?', 1,300 L.F- .25 125. CO .25 325.00 .303 393.90 .25 325.00 .35 455.00 .20 260.00 r. Arlo, .10 Ea. 5.00 200.00 6.50 250.00 3.50 140.00 6.00 240.00 15.00 600.00 6.00 240.00 ..- �zx CP'Pl9t' 15 Sets 100. d3 1,500.00 50.00 750.00 50.00 750.00 120.00 1,800.00 50.00 750.00 25.09 375.00 3. C w1I4a - R -fl. __ Pr 12" .+: j, 10,000 L.F. .25 2,500.00 .25 2,500.00 .303 3,030.00 .25 2,500.00 .35 3,EOO.CO .20 2,000.CO U akin' a. P,xing T's 40 Each 4.01 160.00 2_00 30.00 1.00 40.00 2.00 80.00 .50 20.00 2.00 80.00 h. Cao P,tm9 3,000 L.F. .40 1.200.00 .25 150.00 .303 909.00 .24 720.00 .28 840.00 .15 450.00 5. S.I.II a. 3" Ron-',f. !trs. 190 Each .60 60.00 .25 25.00 .35 35.00 1.00 100.00 .10 10.00 1.00 100.00 6. ;4ark..n4 8_ sr3l e. x_. Sm.lblastinq 1,000 L.E. 1.30 1,30C.00 .75 750.00 .75 750.00 2.00 2,000.00 .65 650.00 .75 750.00 7. 33 sknnt 1,1100 S.F. .30 30.00 .14 140.00 .11 110.00 .25 250.00 .08 80.00 .10 100.00 8, Pr Lmr , 4,]00 C.F. .33 120.00 .C3 220.00 .03 120.00 .05 200.00 .025 100.00 .03 120 -00 9. Bef. Parement Mrks 2,000 Each 2.00 4,000.00 2.19 4,380.00 3.25 61500.00 2.80 5,600.00 3.20 6,400.00 2.50 5,00.00 I0. Ceramm Gvmt. Nicks 1,000 Each .99 900.00 1.18 1,180.00 1.75 1,750.00 1.40 1,400.00 1.60 1,600.00 1.00 1,000.00 36,794.00 TOTALS 35,400.00 36,899.00 36,688.90 49,559.00 38,651.00 29,781.00 'COrra••e9 318 Anent LJ BID A90J1IT 810 MOUNT • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SU >"'IARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED T: A.,,,l Cony ¢t fuf Traffic Strip:nq 6 P,iiient M," m9 DATE: April 5, 1923 ;OC.:T 109: City •A,tle CONTRACT NO. Safety Striping Traffic Enq., Inc. Traffic Operations T I TIES BID AMOUNT BID AMOUNT bf0 MOUNT 010 AOOU.YT 1. Rer CL S L! - _ �. . ,. _ 3011,033 L.F. .025 9,:100.00 .022 7,920.00 .027 9,720.00 p, 4" ai, t _inn, 9500(10 1-J. .073 5.63-3.03 .06 5,1[10.00 .055 4,675.00 c. Ta a' O.f. Laves 61.000 L.F. .15 10,200.00 .14 9,520.00 .107 7,276.00 A. 3 '>Ii4 Lip. s 1,700 L.F. .05 8`1.00 .12 204.00 .095 161.50 a. `i - ett -�n 1,401 Lb's. ? -50 3,500.00 2.15 3,010.00 2.10 2,900.00 n. L'n:t Bill C n 1,300 F.F. .:3 364.00 .22 286.00 .30 390.00 10 Ea. 4.60 1:14.00 6.00 240.00 5.95 238.00 d. RRx C nplet.. 15 Sets 75.00 1,1 ?5.0) 37.50 562.50 67.20 1,008.00 3. Cross.Yka - Refl. i. 12" Aulc 10,000 L.F. .28 2,800.00 .22 2,200.00 .30 3,000.00 4. perking a. P,k,ng T's 40 Each 1.75 70.00 125 50.00 1.40 56.00 h. Ciro ollntinl 3,000 L.F. .IL 330.00 .17 520.00 .30 900.00 5. Svzll St-i'ils _. 3'• 'Inr. -R ^f. Ft". 100 Eath .23 E3.00 .25 25.00 .20 20.00 6. P!,1,9 A. get San ?hlas[ing 1,100 S.F. .80 800.00 .75 750.00 .90 900.00 7. 31 arklut 1,000 S.F, .15 150.00 .135 135.00 .30 300.00 3. Pr- L 'n 3,400 L.F. .01 12:),00 .02 80.00 .03 120.00 9. Ref. Pav",Bnt Mrks 2,000 Each 4. 00 8,000.00 2.15 4,300.00 3.80 7,600A0 10. Cec.xnir. ?'.t. Wks 1,000 Each 2.85 2.850.00 1.10 1,100.00 2.80 2,800.00 TOTALS 46,231.00 35,992.50 42,104.50 BID A90J1IT 810 MOUNT • • I b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Resident Inspector, Assessment District 82 -1 SUBJECT: Request for Approval of Assessment District 82 -1 Contract Change Order No. 6 Relating to An Existing Box Culvert on Haven Avenue South of 4th Street as shown on Sheet 63 of 75 of the Plans It has been determined that it was not necessary to remove the aforementioned box culvert as shown on Sheet 2 of 2 of the contract change order. Deletion of the requirement that this culvert be removed will result in a credit of $870.00 to the project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 6 resulting in a credit of $870,00 to the project. Respectfully submitted, LBH:OKL: jaa Attachment 17 1T, AL VITHPEcF�•jJ 1 1 k� 1 t .._ \ _ 1 (� I '. �casleelK zg ._ G •AVGO I $7r �7 eavlE_�:T_.rce ��x'I ✓va �F/' :-sCererN c✓°,u✓ °` ses SaeEr�t� .— 9 . . -- 1 36 37 38 39 34- 35 �,.n +e•E' :� �Z� cNfNl 4,. FA'.'1l A_'J+'L'�✓'FY ,�:rP.IA"E.l3Vl� J o SN•xc wdr.�cr Exir znr •Fx �.a,� ° �� ' C Np AN4 .a TNf �NES iVNO I.UA'S' K /1 /LOL' /MP /C!/EMCMR; A[C fAC /L /T /Ef ✓�ANOG SN![G'PBE -fEiY.+I:'£DMM %,5/, /NEC STRUCTU('AG SECT /ON R'//J' / �Of' CONC.CCTE Lv'F..r SU6vlA4E CG✓ -� TO rS�. CUf:4� /iUTTCF S✓ALC BE /VNf.PE .OIMAl.EO. V w"V T r /N /FtFF4.f /NG PJRI /AV( rt.J _ ,.v • • Eatinoted Cost Decrease f 870.00 or Increase S By reason o th:a order the tme of empletion will be adjusted as fo 111 8s ASSESSVErM DISRfif.T 82 -1 - Appraved: Cil�ngineer by:, -- CITY DP ItNL]n c uriNIIl t Wo the undFF,Snrd contractor havu given careful consi de rvlt ion to the change propoee� _ QNIW'(,T CIPOM CPDM N), 6 Sheet 1 of 2 PROJU7r: M'Casneat District 62 -1 QMR`Cf M. A. D, 82 -1 prices chows above. 'ID: Bonad ilren- )kGin, Inc. : \proved: Ih t_:p _. wP'i Cntrnetaro:'.ad uv.an- )Wl.w:n, Inc. Contractor. �Z�Z G- You are hereby directed to emke the herein describM changes fron the plans and nn r: specifications or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications oa this contract. N ; This change order is not effective until approved by the City Council. Description of work to be done, estinut. of quantities, and prices to be paid. Segregate between additional work at contract price, agreed price and force account' Dnlese otherwise staled, rates for rental of equipennt cover only such tine =.nd equipmnt is actually used cad no .1 lowance will be red, for idle time. Change requested by: City of Rancho Cocmmnga The last percentage sham is the net ecc'srelated increase or decrease fran tlna o:ig:nal quantity in the Engineer's Estivate. 1. Delete the require:enl of the rmoval of a portion of 10, x 4' R. C.9 per Sheet 60 of 75 of the plans (sec 2 of 2 of this Contract CBUnge Drder p6) • Eatinoted Cost Decrease f 870.00 or Increase S By reason o th:a order the tme of empletion will be adjusted as fo 111 8s Sutrnitted by: <'?'.. Ib te: Appraved: Cil�ngineer by:, -- Wo the undFF,Snrd contractor havu given careful consi de rvlt ion to the change propoee� _ and horebv agree. If this proposal is npproved, that we will provide all equ hrmnl, furnish all imtannls, c,mlpl as anv otherwise lw noted nbnve, and perform all services m necesry for tlla work above specificd, and will acocpt ns full pnyncnt thnrefm the _ prices chows above. : \proved: Ih t_:p _. wP'i Cntrnetaro:'.ad uv.an- )Wl.w:n, Inc. �Z�Z G- As::�..nr lit Ilia; nmil � IVlyor: nn r: Altosl: 0 • 1-2 n Tmv AP, 1J n ATOTIn OTTO n rsnNTO n STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1983 F, TO: City Council and.City Manager 197; FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Kral], Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Subordination Agreement Submitted by Dr. Kornblatt for 10010 Almond Street A lien agreement to secure the off -site improvements at 10010 Almond Street was approved by City Council on August 19, 1981. Dr. Kornblatt, owner of the property, is requesting that City Council approve the attached subordination agreement in order that he may receive additional financing on the property. The finance institution requires the City Lien Agreement be subordinated to their deed of trust. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving said Subordination Agreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Respectfully submitted, LRH K:jaa Attachment �1 CITY ()F oF_ R:\ \CI K) CUCANKAGA rrrLr,: LEIN ENGINEERING DIVISION rxlurn. F 0 n u �l NORTII M ELVIN KORNELATT r1GQECMENT _ • I" = 300' • RESOLUTION NO. * yI� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM MELVIN B. KORNBLATT, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the installation of off -site improvements along 10010 Almond was approved by City Council on August 19, 1981 and recorded in San Bernardino County on October 29, 1931, Instrument No. 81- 239269; and WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above- mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 40 Jon U. Mikels, Mayor • SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SECURIT'! INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT TO AND LOWER PRIORiTv THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY INSTRUMENT. THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of ,l9 by Melvin B. Bornblalt, owner of the an hereinafter descn vcd and hereinafter referred to as "Owner" and the City of Ranch-, Cucamonga hereinafter referred to as "City ", owner and holder of the certain Real Property and Lien Agreement hereinafter referred to as "Lien Agreement ". WITNESSETH THAT WHEREAS, Real Property Improvement contract and Lien Agreement dated August 19, 1981 covering: (See attached legal description) to secure construction of off -site improvements, including curb, gutter and pavement which was recorded October 29, 1981 as Document No. 81- 279269 in the Official Records of said County; and WHEREAS, owner has executed a deed of trust and note in the sum of 'IC F na rd thousand dollars (s:Oe Ono On1 dated `1 h 9, 19P1 in favor Of WORLD SAVINGS AND LOAN hereinafter re erred to as "Lender", payab a with interest and upon the terms and conditions described therein, which deed of trust is to be recorded concurrently herewith; and • WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to modifying said loan that said deed of trust last above mentioned shall unconditonal ly be and remain at all times a lien a charge upon the land hereinnefore described, prior and superior to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement; and WHEREAS, Lender is willing to modify said loan provided the deed of trust securing the same is a lien or charge upon the above described property prior to superior to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement and provided that City will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender; and WHEREAS, it is the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender modify said loan to Owner; and City is willing that the deed of trust securing the same shall, as modified, constitute a Ilea or charge upon said land which is unconditionally prior to superior to the lien or charge on the Lien Agreement. NO',, , THEREFORE, in tonsiderat inn of the mutual benefits Accuring to the parties hereto and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, and in order to induce Lender to modify the loan above referred to, it 1s hereby declared, undersstood and agreed IS fnllpws: (1) That said deed of trust securing said note in favor of Lender and any renewals or extensions thereof, shall unconditionally he and remain at all times a lien or charge on the property therein described prior And Superior to the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement. a� • 2) That Lender would not modify its loan above a described without this subordination agreement. (3) That this agreement shall be the whole and only R StAIE Or CuIFpgNII. agreement with regard to the subordination of the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement to the lien S5 coupn Or Sna nGmmvnrro I' or- charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, Ig 6 but only insofar as would affect the priority Vna Ma.�ry n aM LgnlysM `IINe M Wr.Mmr between the deed of trust and Lien Agreement any Prior agreements as to such subordination : 14V [: 15. KOIGpL1TT including, but not limited tat those provisions, if any, contained in the Lien Agreement which Fqn MOIAnr 8Gl On STAMP provide for the subordination of the Iien a charge thereof to another deed or deeds of truss ? or to another mortgage or mortgages. nnvM pmrvl in m^mlM pyb nl yin tarnlnn The City declares, agrees and acknowledges that: (A) He consents to and approves all provisions of the note and deed of trust in favor of Lender above am,pi;ow.rwn m� n,�v+!vn morrow .,'i / referred to as modified by that certain modification agreement by and between Owner and sr�Nw. /NY.r �r r'ir+ Lender, dated March n, 088 i (b) He intentionally and unconditionally naives, McPNll$' relinquishes and subordinates the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement in favor of the lien or charge upon said land of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to and understands that in reliance upon, and in consideration of this waiver, relinquishment and subordination soecifcc loans and advances are being and will be made and as a part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other obligations are being and will be entered into which would not be made or entered into but for said reliance upon this waiver, relinquishment and subordination; and (c) An endorsement has been placed upon the Lien Agreement that said Lien Agreement has by this instrument been subordinated to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to. NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION 'd NICti ALLOWS THE PERSON OBLIGATED ON YOUR SEAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN, A PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EXPENDED FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN IMPROVEMENT Of THE LAND, WSAFECD a }IItE 1NiY11EMCF R StAIE Or CuIFpgNII. S5 coupn Or Sna nGmmvnrro I' onm tl111 is m[lt Ig 6 Vna Ma.�ry n aM LgnlysM `IINe M Wr.Mmr : 14V [: 15. KOIGpL1TT Fqn MOIAnr 8Gl On STAMP ? nnvM pmrvl in m^mlM pyb nl yin tarnlnn . /1mwn.we a >.wnma�a ��+loe wnnM manonvnl LeY "Pon am,pi;ow.rwn m� n,�v+!vn morrow .,'i / ..xnr.R`-z•'•` sr�Nw. /NY.r �r r'ir+ "sYl i f McPNll$' I- 0 C J il CITY OF RANCI -I0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager v FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Storm Drain Reimbursement Agreement in conjunction with Parcel Map 6658 - Etiwanda Properties In conjunction with the sale of the property for construction of the Pic -N -Sav distribution center, Parcel Map 6658 was required to accomplish the necessary land division. As a condition of approval of the parcel map construction of master plan storm drain in Fourth Street was required, with stipulation of storm drain fee credits. Storm drain construction has been agreed to an bonded for prior to the recordation of the map. As a part of the land sale agreement between Etiwanda Properties (Ralph D. Wenger and Theodore B. Zwicker), it was agreed that storm drain fee credits in the amount of $112,825 would be assigned to Pic -N -Say. This credit was assigned at the time of building permit issuance on April 1. The attached agreement deals with the above described credit arrangement and also establishes a procedure by which the City will receive normal drainage fees upon the remaining property for purposes of reimbursing Wenger and Zwicker the additional credit amount. The final amount eligible for reimbursement will be determined upon completion of the construction of the drain. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council approve and authorize the signing of the Storm Drain Reimbursement Agreement for Parcel Map 6658. Respectfully submitted, 'a�� LBH.�jaa Attachment a� STORM BRAIN REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT PARCEL MAP 6658 City of Rancho Cucamonga ( "the City ") and Ralph D. Won:ger and Theodore B. Zwicker ( "the Developers ") agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This agreen t is made with reference to the following facts: 1.1 The Property Developers acquired an 266 acres of uni proved property ( "the property ") from Dow Chemical Ccapany in the City. Subsequent to such acquisition Developers sold 90.26 acres of the property to West Coast Liquidators, Inc. ( ",vest Coast ") and is presently the owner of the balance of the property in the amount of 173.70 acres of land within Parcel Map No. 6658 filed with the City. 1.2 Drainage Fee In order to plan and develop drainage facilities for the City, the City has determined that as a condition to develop property within certain areas of the City, a drainage fee in an amount established from time to time by the City Council of the City will be required to be paid for each acre to be developed. Under its agreement with West Coast, Developers agreed to pay a drainage fee in an amount not to eeceed $112,825 as a credit against the drainage fee due as a result of the develoomnt of tho Kest Coast parcel. � o J • • 0 1.3 Storm Drain Facilities In connection with the develop;ent of the pro- perty, Developers entered into an agreement with the City to construct a portion of the storm drain facilities within 4th street ( "the storm drain facilities ") as a cart of the raster plan of storm. drains for the City. 1.4 Present Transaction In consideration of Developers constructing the storm, drain facilities, the City has agreed that Developers shall receive credit against the drainage fee of an amount equal to Developers, cost of constructing the storm„ drain is facilities. 2. CONSTRUCPICN OF 9MRM DRADT Developers agree to cause to be constructed the storm drain facilities consistent with the Master Plan of Storm Drains for the City. Prior to awarding the contract for the construction of the store drain facilities, Developers will obtain at least three (3) bids from duly qualified contractors and submit such bids to the City for its review. The amount to be roirbursed to tie Developers shall be the amount of the lowest responsible bidder plus the cost of engineering and other direct expenses. Uc n carpletion of the storm drain facilities and acceotanco by the City, the Developers will 0 -2- • submit to the city evidence of payment of its actual costs of construction of the storm drain facilities plus engineering and other direct expenses which aggregate amount shall be subject to reimbursement under the orovisions of paragraph 3.2 below less only the sum of $112,625 credited to the West Coast parcel under paragraph 3.1 below. 3. MUND 3.1 Credit City agrees that an amunt not to exceed . $112, 825 of the storm drain costs will be credited aqainst the drainage fee applicable to the West Coast parcel. 3.2 Reimbursement City agrees that as the balance of the property is developed, it will orcratly pay Developers np<m receipt the full amount of the drainage fees collected by it until such time as Developers have been reimbursed the full cost of the stom drain facilities as determined under paragraph 2 above less only the amount credited to the ;Jest Cost 7arcel under the provisions of 3.1 above. L -3- r r 0 4. NO OBLIGATI94 Developers agree that the City shall have no obligation to make any refunds to it unless and until portions of the property are developed and the City receives a drainage fee in connection with such development. 5. EWIRE AGREE:EY1' This agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties and cannot be altered or modified except by an agreement in writing signed by the City and Developers. • 6. CAPTIO \5 Captions are for ease of reference and shall have no effect upon the construction of this agreement or of any of the terms or provisions thereof. Dated: , 1 983. i Ralph D. ;* -n(jPx The lore B. Zwicker CITY Of RANCI10 Cl.'CA%K)NG1 9 By _4_ n 0 r l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1983 , TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Contract Amendment for Design of Storm Restoration Work for Hellman Avenue -San Bernardino Road to Base Line Road The attached amended agreement finalizes the scope of work and budget for design services for the emergency storm damage repair and in addition, sets the not -to- exceed budget for the Hellman Avenue reconstruction project approved at your last Council meeting. The final billing on the restoration work was $9,058.54. The not -to- exceed budget for Hellman Avenue is $15,850.00. The construction surveyor will be on a time and materials basis with an estimated budget of RECOMMENDATION: It is recomended that Council approve the amended agreement with L. D. King Engineering for storm damage repair and restoration. RRee`ss�speeecctfully submitted, LBH :j Attachment 9 • Is CITY OF RANCHO CUCA \TONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1983 y TO: City Council and 'City Manager v FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Emergency Restoration and Repairs - Various Locations Per Council approval at the meeting of April 6, Staff has prepared documents and plans and began soliciting bids for the emergency repairs of the following locations: Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to 6th Street Haven Avenue adjacent to Chaffey College Haven Avenue from Highland Avenue to Lemon Avenue Hellman Avenue from 8th Street to 9th Street Hellman Avenue from Cucamonga Creek to 7th Street Due to the emergency status, the bid procedure timing is such that bid results will not be available until 2:00 pm, Friday, April 15, 1983. However, on Monday afternoon, April 18, 1983, Council will be provided a bid summary, apparent low bidder and any additional information required to award the subject contract. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council award the contract for "Emergency Restoration and Repairs - Various Locations" to the lowest qualified bidder and execute documents for same. Engineer's Estimate is 878,000.00. Respectfully submitted, LBH/iP: j as Aptii 14, 1983 AMENDMEVT TO AGREE'E.NT FOR CONSULTING S`eRVICES dated Match 17, 1983, by and between the City -.c5 Rancho cucamcnoa and L. D. K.i.no, Inc. Fort Dohign and Reb.totati.on o3 S.Gteet and Drainage Imp•- tevemr•ent,s at Vau.cua Locations Revise Secti_cn 5, "SCCPE OF SERVTCES AN'D PERFM ANCE SPECIFICATIU.NS ", to rte6Cee_ chca:gcs in Scope e6 Se.viceh; Section b, "PERICD CF PER;CUANCE "; and Sect,i.cits 7 -A, 7 -B and 7 -C, "METHOD OF PWMEWF", to te"Lcct ,cv.isim;s; a£.sc inCE2..ing the tevi.s.ionA e6 Section 7 -D. Leer,— cn £ - HcfLna; Avcnuc Task ' Prepare a comparative construction cost analysis (preliminary • study) between the alternatives of providing necessary restoration work, inc'udino overlaying existing pavement with asphalt concrete; and removal and replacement of damaged portions of pavement, curb and drainage facili- ties, and replacing existing concrete pavement with asphalt pavement and widening at various locations. Tasc Sce;"c op fUOtF to inaBudc the 1'trpata[ien e6 6inai PS 5 E, incLr d.i ;:g dr.s ign sun•ep 6e, the 60£,fmuiny ue ti: oeneta.£C.V descubad as jcUctvS: 1) L'per, c.om, °£rt,ien cR the d;si,gn •sutvep and st-Leet c.oss- ctic na, suhrr.i.t trce "nra.ded st:cct '_,, - ;ca£ sections to CITY p�,t ;':oval. Page 1 o6 7 -; n Amendment • • 2! Reviete jeasib.i ity o5 teduci,ny the quailed cu,t5 to cutb rcidth o5 i;eLb'at Avenue at the no.tt{ucest ee.v:et et the inte.sectien toff; San Fc.natii:c Road to $aciUta,te sidewaCF ecru t.uc.:.i.c•r. xZthout ,wev.ing eu 5tir:g 2 to 3 5oct diameter thee. Rseatch and tdcr-,t,i.5y ex.isti.reg a',i,Cu',i.ce and cm;jCi.cts rau.hi,r: the coilst: ,Ct, on L&iii,ta. 41 maiden HeUnan Avenue to 44 Beet cun.b to uitb at rho 60UNeing kcca.ticns: a) So,: Sa•in tdino Road to 3 80 fleet rvooitr, on the east bide 6; Sal 6✓u;atdino Road to 670 'cot nortth on the :cent side inr ^love Sao: Setnatdine Road a;d HeCJnmi Aver:uc u�tes ec;. i.c n, i;m£uding oLttet and doAi,veway aphcoach, 100 feet :ce5t and 150 eet cast Sao: "nc.ra;,:,, ; :o Road nnt:.s.ide. o' i!BC -aoi Aver:ue 6i7.cct irIwvrvnnr.' to a.b£ PCC pave- root a:? scFcctcd osphai' ca;ctetc. na•Cncr^ a,;d tcccrvs ^uet mi,'1: .. _^ crr:cc cte lraa•rr�mrt nvrc n •?.cpa'C base be IIccG: Sar: Ru.:d ari ,SPRR. C, •.,., •,a. Li :,i ,r,af' erne . .rr; r.t r..'.; ,w;' M caisLi r.n •r,r' :r n• ,;gib m;d au'tr', • +;c` ash :.jai.; cvlznCto Co. Ctian. KI p Pooe 2 o6 7 A rrn• r:dmen c; T.won Stteu to 630 feet no "Ith on the east .side d; 1C0 jcet no -t.th o4 Hem£acF Street tc Chmtd: St ,Cct or: the Leut side inr ^love Sao: Setnatdine Road a;d HeCJnmi Aver:uc u�tes ec;. i.c n, i;m£uding oLttet and doAi,veway aphcoach, 100 feet :ce5t and 150 eet cast Sao: "nc.ra;,:,, ; :o Road nnt:.s.ide. o' i!BC -aoi Aver:ue 6i7.cct irIwvrvnnr.' to a.b£ PCC pave- root a:? scFcctcd osphai' ca;ctetc. na•Cncr^ a,;d tcccrvs ^uet mi,'1: .. _^ crr:cc cte lraa•rr�mrt nvrc n •?.cpa'C base be IIccG: Sar: Ru.:d ari ,SPRR. C, •.,., •,a. Li :,i ,r,af' erne . .rr; r.t r..'.; ,w;' M caisLi r.n •r,r' :r n• ,;gib m;d au'tr', • +;c` ash :.jai.; cvlznCto Co. Ctian. KI p Pooe 2 o6 7 A rrn• r:dmen 8) P.tov.ide 12 -.inch curb de5£eeto.0 on the downutteam aide o0 6taeet • iintcuecticnvs mid dtive;cay cuts and 6p£a6h nuU-6 at va.tiou6 £ocaticn6. 81 P.tc•vide 12 -inch cutb de5£ectets or. the dcwnatteam aide o6 at-,vet inu'e �sectioiu mid &ivemy cut6 and ap£msh wa£G at vati.oua £oeationa. ?) Ccc2dinate imptovementt p£au with potent aE deveiopmen,t impnovemen.ts ¢Conn the :eeste,Zy side o5 Heitman Avenue between Chu.tch Street and th.c SPRR, Ujrited to .tiw (2) meeti.nas. 101 Ry:a,i,: exZi Ling cu. b and 6idcnra£h at va.:,ious £ocat,i.on6. 171 Upon receipt cj bids, assist CITY in an:a2usis ej bids and make ,ecor- • meKdat , cn on O;Wvtd 06 cont"act. 121 Revise pnevicua£u competed PS 5 E pot the Footh.i££ Boacvatd- He.!',Pmar. Avenuc project to intcP.ude imptovement4 betecen San Betna,.dino Road to SPRR. Location 3 - Hellman Avenue Prepare restoration plans, specifications and construction cost estimate for the replacement of street and drainage improvements at the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and 8th Street intersection. • Page 3 o5 7 Amendment v i • Locati.ou_4 - Hcifnan Avenue P.te,;ate ,estctati.on pfanA, spcci ica.ti.on,6 and cost estvwte 6c, the ae,,Eacenent pavement, 24 -.inch cutb, pattn.ay txetec.tion, ar,d ,,eccn- nStuc,tion c6 pavement ttars.iti.en at vatic•u5 iEccations beticee. 7th St.teet and the Cucamonga Channet. Location 5 - Haven Avenue Prepare restoration plans, specifications and construction cost estimate for replacement of pavement, curb and gutter, parkway protection, and roadside ditch along the east side of Haven Avenue in the vicinity of Chaffey College at various locations between College Avenue and blilson Avenue. • Location 6 - Archibald Avenue Prepare restoration plans, specifications and construction cost estimate l J for replacement of pavement and curb and gutter along both sides of Archi- bald Avenue, inclading-carb-retnrns. defete Location 7 - Hermosa Avenue Prepare a preliminary study recommending desired improvements. Prepare plans, specifications and construction cost estimate to repair the intersection of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue and reconstruct Hermosa Avenue south to 200 feet south of Mignonette Street, including drainage facilities and dpsign survey. Coordinate improvenents with CALTRAt1S for their approval. Page 4 c6 7 7f Amendment. v `' Location S - Haven Avenue Prepare plans, specifications and construction cost estimate to - tepait existing roadside asphalt ditch, aid p.tevide parkway protection and repairs to the northeast corner of the intersection of Highland Avenue and Haven Avenue. Location 12 - Hellman Avenue Prepare restoration plans, specifications and construction cost estimate for the replacement of existing pavement and curb along the wcste,Cy side of Hellman Avenue. Lecatien5 3, :, 5, 6, 8 and 12 will be combined into a single project for the preparation of plans, specifications and construction cost estimates for con- struction bidding purposes. PROJECT NO. 1 • Lecaticn 7 ;c.iU be a e.ingte project pot the ptepacati.en o$ pCane, apeci,;Ccati.o+cs a;d cmu5ttucti.or, rest eb.t(.mate pct cowsbu:cfiiar, bidding ;:; :;pcsG. PRCIECT NO. 2 Location 2 will be a single project for the preparation of plans, specifications and construction cost estimate for construction bidding purposes. PROJECT NO. 3 Section 5. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE. Upon receipt of a fully executed copy of this Agreement, CotISUL7h7T shall commence performance of service hereunder. The time frame for ccirpletion of each Location is listed below: r I LJ 3/ Pagc 5 op 7 .> Arr.endmer,t • Lccaticn 2: Task 1 - 10 working days after notice to proceed. • Location 2: Task 2 - Preliminary PS & E within 30 working says after notice to proceed. Final PS & E 14 working days after receiving final comments from CITY. Leca;i cry S, 4, 5, 6, & and 12: Final PS &E within 10 working days after notice to proceed. Lccatio0 7: Preliminary PS & E within 30 working days after notice to proceed. Final PS& E within 14 working days after receiving final comments from CITY. Section 7. METHOD OF PAYMENT. The estimated total fees for the services to be performed by CONSULTANT are as follows: S!.4Xlh!014 NOT TO EXCEED FEE A. PROJECT NO. 1 - Lccotionb 3, 4, 5, 6, & atd 12 Final PS &E $7,000 Design Survey 0 B. PROJECT NO. 2'- Lccaticr 7 preliminary Study 1,000 Def;� c F4nal -P94E Design - Survey Page 6 05 7 Amendment !dAXX'.!J,'d • NOT 70 EXCEED FEE C. PROJECT NO. 3 - Location 2 Preliminary Study S 1,000 Final PS &E 12,000 Design Survey 3, 850 ES71MATED Fe` "t Ccr.stuctZon Sutve,y at 7SM in acec %.dance $ 8,000 with L. D. King Rate Schedutc, incCuding imptevemen.ta to He.Lbm n Avenue 6 -tam 100 beet south e6 Fec"ILiU Beutevatd to San Be'u:atdino Road ATTEST: By City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By Mayor L, D. Y,ING, INC. By Branch Manaaer� 'y Page. 7 ob 1 x Am2ndmen.t • • • F-1 OTTV /A D A TYn Un Of TO A TRnNTO A STAFF REPORT r'I I C' DATE: April 20, 1983 TO: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Intent to Set Public Hearing for June 15, 1983 for the Vacation of a Portionof 8th Street located between Haven Avenue and the east property line of Parcel Map 7797, approximately 1334 feet west of Rochester The Industrial Specific Plan allows for the vacation of portions of Eighth Street between Haven and Rochester Avenues if required for rail service. Upon completion of the construction of Sixth Street within Assessment District 82- 1, Eighth Street can be abandoned without adversely affecting circulation in this area. The Caldwell Company has requested the City begin procedures to vacate Eighth Street so that it may begin plans for a railroad alignment north of a site located between Haven and Cleveland Avenues. With this request, Staff feels that the length of Eighth Street between Haven and the east property line of Parcel Map 7797 as shown on the attached map may be vacated at this time. Staff is working with the utility companies and property owners at this time for the reservations of easements within the right -of -way to be vacated, Planning Commission at their meeting of February 23, 1983, recommended Staff submit this vacation to City Council. Attached is a resolution setting the time and date for the public hearing for June 15, 1983. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the time and date for the public hearing for the above subject project for June 15, 1983. Respectfully- ubm I LL:B 11 Attachments r ,,I() �1 11 0 w r a a w m 0 r t lJ RESOLUTION NO. * q7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE 8TH STREET LOCATED BETWEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF PARCEL MAP 7797 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 8300, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate that portion of 8th Street located between Haven Avenue and the east property line of Parcel Map 7797, a City street, as shown on Map No. V -026 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 15th day of JuneTBT at 7:30 p.m., in the Lions Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place . for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determining whether said City street is necessary for present or prospective street purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be posted conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 30 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET ". SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions; if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 66: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of—Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: * , is ABSENT: I� ORDINANCE NO. * �q ✓ • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0217 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE CREATING A SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 61.0217 of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: SECTION 2: Definitions: The Senior Housing Overlay District is a floating district that requires certain conditions before it can be attached to a specific parcel of land and as such is not given a specific location until a developer applies for it. As a combination Planned Development and Overlay District, it is intended to include development review, zoning, and subdivision, all of which shall be conducted simultaneously with required public hearings. SECTION 3: Purposes: It is the overall purpose of the Senior Housing Overlay District to carry out the following policies of the City's General Plan with respect toward Senior Citizens. • a. The City shall promote programs which meet the special housing needs of the elderly, handicapped, and minority groups (pp. 15 & 88). fib b. The City should encourage a balanced supply of rental and ownership housing affordable to low- and moderate- income households (p. 78). c. The City shall implement programs which assist low - and moderate - income families, the elderly, handicapped persons, large families, and minorities in renting and buying existing housing (p. 83). d. The City shall investigate the feasibility for special criteria to provide reduced parking requirements for new housing projects. If found feasible, the policy would provide for reduced on- site costs for developers of elderly housing resulting in lower unit cost (p. 89). The Senior Housing Overlay District is intended to facilitate the construction of affordable rental housing units that will serve the current and long term City need for affordable senior citizen oriented dwelling units while maintaining a high degree of quality in project design and construction. f—� /! Ordinance No. Page 2 • The District is further intended, by offering various development incentives, to make the development of senior citizen oriented affordable units attractive to potential developers while at the same time providing assurances to the City that units developed by use of the incentives offered as part of the Overlay District, remain available and affordable to the target group intended - senior citizens of low and moderate incomes. SECTION 4: Target Population: The primary resident population group that is int— endde to be served by the units constructed through use of incentives offered as part of the Senior Housing Overlay District are senior citizens who meet both of the following criteria: a. 1. Married couples - head of household age 55 years or older. 2. Individuals - age 55 years or older. b. Individuals or married couples whose annual income from all sources is equal to or less than 80% of the County median income as currently determined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. SECTION 5: Applicability: The Senior Housing Overlay District • requires the presence of certain conditions before it can be applied for or attached to a specific parcel of land. In order to adequately and satisfactorily serve the target population that this District has been created to serve, any proposed project site must demonstrate the following conditions and features: a. Appropriate base district zoning. b. Land uses in the immediate and surrounding area, current and projected, must be compatible with the living environment required by senior citizens and must be free of health, safety, or noise problems (i.e. area generally quiet). c. Area infrastructure must be in place or constructed as part of the project and capable of serving the proposed project including: - streets - sidewalks - traffic /pedestrian signals d. Proposed site topography must be fairly level and easily traversed by persons of limited mobility. • -�-3 • Ordinance No. Page 3 e. Proposed site must demonstrate close proximity to commercial establishments, service providers, and other amenities including: - food shopping - drug stores - banks - medical and dental facilities - public transit (main or frequently served routes) - open space /recreational facilities SECTION 6: Development Incentives: In order to reduce development costs associated with the construction of housing oriented toward senior citizens of low and moderate income, the city is prepared to offer a developer some or all of the following incentives, depending upon the quality, size, nature, and scope of the project proposed. a. Reduction In Required On -Site Parking: The current city stand —for on -site parking in multiple family projects is 2.2 parking spaces per dwelling unit with one space per dwelling unit being a covered carport or garage. The City will grant a reduction in • required on -site parking down to a minimum ratio of .5 non - covered parking spaces per unit. is b. Owe l lin Unit Density Bonus: In order to maximize net yie d per acre, the CTFY will consider increasing the allowable project density by either granting a 25: density bonus to the project site's exisiting density category (per California Government Code Section 65915), or by granting a request for a change in density range (per the City's General Plan), or both depending upon the quality, size, nature, and scope of the project. c. Fee ''Aivers /Reductions: Projects submitted under the Senior Housing Overlay District may receive, depending upon their size, nature, and scope, a reduction or waiver of some or all Cit y imposed development submittal and processing fees. Such reductions of waivers may affect the following fee schedule: - Planned Development /Project Submittal Fees - Park Fees - School Fees ('when applicable) - Other fees (where applicable) Ordinance No. Page 4 • Fee reductions or waivers are subject to negotiation between the City and the project developer and will be granted based upon that amount of reduction or warier necessary to place per unit monthly rental costs in the range affordable to the target population. SECTION 7: City /Developer Agreement Regarding Long Term Affordability of Units: Development incentives granted by the City to a developer using the Senior Housing Overlay District are predicated upon the long term availability and affordability of the units for the target population previously defined. In order to insure that the units remain available and affordable to this group, the developer will be required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City per California Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5. SECTION 8: The City shall establish a process and such administrative guidelines as it shall deem necessary in order to implement the provisions of the Senior Housing Overlay District. SECTION 9: The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on February 23, 1983 for Environmental Assessment 83 -02 and found that it will not create any adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on April 6, 1983. SECTION 9: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk • shall cause t e same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren . 'Wasserman, City Clerk Jon D. Mike s, ,ayor • ap k) ORDINANCE NO. * P D AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202' - 151 -34 DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 7827, AND LOCATED WEST OF ARCHIBALD AND NORTH OF BASE LINE, FROM R -3 /PD TO R -3 /SO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follo.as: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. S. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly, Assessor's Parcel Number 202- 151 -34, a portion thereof, described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7827, approximately 4.55 acres in size and generally located west of Archibald and north of Base Line, is hereby changed from R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Deve)opment) to R -3 /50 (Multiple Family Residential /Senior Overlay), SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (I5) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, lg *. AYES: NOES: is ASSENT: 1 /t� !rA" 36 • RESOLUTION N0. * P 3 — a 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED LAND USE PLAN OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed General Plan Amendment and recommends approval thereof; and WHEREAS, this Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and policies contained therein encouraging affordable housing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the following Amendment to the Land Use Plan of the General Plan. SECTION 1: General Plan Amendment 83 -03: An amendment of the General Plan Land Use Plan in the area west of Archibald and north of Base Line, further described as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 7827, as shown on the • attached Exhibit "A ". This area shall be changed from Medium -High Residential to High Residential. SECTION 2: A Negative Declaration is hereby adopted for this General Plan Amendment based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren '4. 'Wasserman, CityCity Clerk L 1 - J Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor l� % • ORDINANCE NO. * ' q 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 1.08.160 and 1.08.170 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 1.08.160 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 6 .024A b (3) of the San Bernardino County Code is added to read as follows: Section 61.024A(b)(3) Home Occupations pursuant to Section 61.0219(a)(9). SECTION 2: Section 1.08.160 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 6 .0 4D b (3) of the San Bernardino County Code is added to read as follows: Section 61.024D(b)(3) Home Occupations pursuant to Section 61.0219(a)(9). • SECTION 3: Section 1.08.170 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 6 .02 9 a (9) of the San Bernardino County Code is amended to read as folloas: Section 61.0219(x)(9) - HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS A. Home Occupations, as defined in Section 61.022, may be permitted on any property used for residential purposes upon approval of the City Planner based on the following conditions: 1. The use of the dwelling for such home occupation shall be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its inhabitants. 2. No persons, other than members of the family who reside on the premises, shall be engaged in such activity. 3. There shall be no change in the outward appearance of the building or premises, or other visible evidence of the activity. 4. There shall be no sales of products on the premises, except produce (fruit or vegetables) grown on the subject property, Ordinance yo. Page 2 • 5. The use shall not allow customers or clientele to visit dwellings. However, incidental uses such as music lessons, and the sale of fruits and vegetables may be permitted if the intensity of such instruction is approved by the City Planner. 6. No equipment or processes shall be used on the subject property which creates noise, smoke, glare, fumes, odor, vibration, electrical, radio or television interference disruptive to surrounding properties. 7. No home occupation shall be conducted in an accessory building. Normal use of the garage may be permitted if such use does not obstruct required parking. S. Not more than 15% of the total square footage of the dwelling or one room of the dwelling, whichever is less, shall be used for the home occupation. • 9. The use shall not involve storage of materials or supplies in an accessory building or outside any structures. 10. Use of the United States Postal Service in conjunction with the home occupation shall be done by means of a post office box. 11. No signs shall be displayed in conjunction with the home occupation and there shall be no advertising using the home address. 12. A home occupation permit is not valid until a current City business license is obtained. 13. The use shall not involve the use of commercial vehicles for delivery of materials to or from the premises, other than a vehicle not to exceed a capacity of 1 112 ton, owned by the operator of such home occupation. 14. If an applicant is not the owner of the property where a home occupation is to be conducted, then a signed statement from the owner approving such use of the dwelling must be submitted with the application. • � is Ordinance No. Page 3 B. Procedure for Approval: Upon acceptance of a home occupation application, the City Planner or his designated representative shall review the request for compliance with the above conditions. Following a 5 day review period, the City Planner shall render a decision. The decision shall clearly state, in writing, any conditions of approval or reasons for denial based upon the above findings. The decision of the City Planner shall be final unless appealed to the Planning Commission within fourteen (14) days from his decision. Upon receiving approval from the City Planner or his designate for a home occupation, the applicant shall immediately make application for a City Business License. City Business Licenses expire on a yearly basis. If the business license is not renewed within thirty (30) days after expiration, then the home occupation permit shall become null and void. C. Aooeal Procedure: • The decision of the City Planner may be appealed within fourteen (14) calendar days to the Planning Commission by the applicant or any other aggrieved person as prescribed in Section 61.0222 of the San Bernardino County Code, LJ SECTION 4: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California; nere'by finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment and issues a Negative Declaration for this Amendment. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause t e same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 16-it/ a • Is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner C7 19,J 1 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83 -02 TENTATIVE TRACT - RANCHO CENTER - A Change of zone tram R- 3 (Multiple Family Residential) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development and the development of 88 units arranged as four- plexes on 6.4 acres located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman - APN 208- 01 -02, 04. SUMMARY: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 9, 1983 to consider the above- described project and approved the related tract map with conditions as attached and recommended approval of the Negative Declaration and zone change. Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Reort and Minutes, which fully describe the project. The proposed project is consistent with all City related ordinances and plans. The proposed density of 13.75 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac). Environmental impacts were determined not to be significant because of mitigation measures designed into the project as explained in the Planning Commission Staff Report. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing and notice— s�to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. At the Planning Commission public hearing there was no public opposition to the project. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planned Development PD 83 -02 for the above - described project through adoption of the attached Ordinance and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Resljectfully submitted, Rick Oomez City Planner RG:DC:jr s7 I Planned Development 83 -02 /Rancho Center Page 2 Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report & Resolution of Approval Minutes of March 9, 1983 Planning Commission Meeting City Council Ordinance • • �a • I 1 �I I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Re ueste_�d Action_ To change the zoning from R -3 to R -3 /PD, and approval of site plan, elevations, and subdivision map. B. Purpose: Development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes. C. Location: South of Base Line, west side of Hellman (Exhibit -- D. Size: 6.4 acres E. Existing Zoning: R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) F. Existing Land Use: One older residence, otherwise vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - one Single Family Reen Ce, vacant; AP South - SPRR; citrus orchard; R -1 East - Office, single family tract; AP; R -1 West - Single Family tract, park; R -1 H. General Plan: Project Site - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) North - Office South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Office, Low Residential West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac), Park, Civic /Community �? ITEM F ..v —` -- CITY OF RANCHO CULNIONGA CO 10A STAFF REPORT — 1477 DATE: March 9, 1983 TO: Members of the Planning Comnission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 83 -02 - TENTATIVE TRACT 2362 - RANCHO CENTER - A change of zone from R -3 tMultiple Family Residential to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) and the development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes on 6.4 acres located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman - APN 208 - 011 -02, 04, 71. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Re ueste_�d Action_ To change the zoning from R -3 to R -3 /PD, and approval of site plan, elevations, and subdivision map. B. Purpose: Development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes. C. Location: South of Base Line, west side of Hellman (Exhibit -- D. Size: 6.4 acres E. Existing Zoning: R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) F. Existing Land Use: One older residence, otherwise vacant. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - one Single Family Reen Ce, vacant; AP South - SPRR; citrus orchard; R -1 East - Office, single family tract; AP; R -1 West - Single Family tract, park; R -1 H. General Plan: Project Site - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac) North - Office South - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) East - Office, Low Residential West - Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac), Park, Civic /Community �? ITEM F ..v Planned Develop . 83 -02 /Rancho Center Planning Commission Agenda March 9, 1983 Page 2 1J Site Char ac sloteristics: The southwestern half of the site is a hill with pes averaging 17 percent. The northeastern half of the site moderately slopes to the southwest at a 5 percent grade. A minor drainage course 10 -15 feet wide and 3 -4 feet deep bisects the site from the northwest corner of the site to existing culvert at railroad tracks (Exhibit "F "). Two dozen mature trees of differing varieties; entire site covered with low weeds and grasses. Dirt paths run through the site from Hellman to Lions Park. Thick Eucalyptus windrow off -site along west boundary. d. Aoolicab le Regulations: R -3 and planned development combining districts permit four -plex units; no minimum lot size; 2.2 parking spaces per unit. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Storm drain connection from Lions Park to existing culvert at railroad right -of -way requires extensive grading. Grading concept will "balance" site by using soil from cutting hill for necessary fill for drainage ( "Exhibit "d"). Stepped building pads will be used to minimize cut as much as possible. . Temporary access road with landscaping will be provided from Base Line and emergency access to Hellman. Hellman Avenue street improvements will be postponed to coincide with storm drain improvements. A temporary asphalt sidewalk will be required from railroad tracks to Base Line to provide a safe pedestrian pathway, which is part of a school route. B. Design Review: The Committee has worked with the applicant to resolve concerns relative to the site plan layout, recreation space, and Hellman streetscape. The site plan has been revised to include a variety of setbacks from private streets which increases open space around units. Grading has been altered to provide a gently rolling lawn area for recreation at the southwest corner. Increased setbacks, mounding, wrought -iron fencing and specimen size trees will be utiized along Hellman Avenue. C. Environmental Review: Based upon the Initial Study, the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment because of the mitigation measures below: Impact: Substantial cut into hill will result in 2:1 slope. litigation: Stepped building pads; hill already graded to the west with pads and 2:1 slopes. • J • • 0 Planned Development Planning Commission March 9, 1983 Page 3 83 -02 /Rancho Center Agenda Impact: Construction will increase surface water runoff and reduce absorption rates. Mitigation: Storm drains and inlet structures will be provided. Impact: Development will block traditional path to schools through property which bypasses hazardous traffic situations and discontinuous sidewalks on Hellman at railroad. Mitigation: Temporary sidewalk required from railroad to Base Line. III. FACTS FOR FINDING: The subdivision map has been prepared in accordance with City standards and policies and the project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision. The project design is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider alT material and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for finding and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolutions and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. RespectfulllAsubmitted, City Planner RG:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "I" Exhibit "J" Initial Stu( - Location Map - Subdivision Map - Site Plan - Landscape Plan - Grading Plan - Natural Features Map - Site Utilization Map - Floor Plans - Elevations - Grading Section ly, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions 1'� CITY OF RAINCI K> CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 0 NORTIi rrrl.r:: �.Q,�IG7J r.XInriT.__sc:nl.e • • II M 'A' SASE I IIE a VIL VT C� V- LNORTI I CITY OF FrEM: —wr I lqb&z. - RANCHOCUCANIONGA i-rri.r. : MAM"Ve mAr PLANNING DIVISION FNIIIBIT - f3 scmx: �7 v - C� V- LNORTI I CITY OF FrEM: —wr I lqb&z. - RANCHOCUCANIONGA i-rri.r. : MAM"Ve mAr PLANNING DIVISION FNIIIBIT - f3 scmx: �7 ---------- it I SAS1 CITY OF / ITEM : Or Z3 co z RAMC I X) CUCAMONGA TITI.Et to SITE Roy PLANNING DIVISION FNllll3lT:.-C..—Scm.c: -� 6�- • • c TII CITY OP ��7/��2"��Z 19 R:1 \CI IU CI:C:1MK) \(r:1 TITI,FC.9 •«f PLC\ \ING DIVISION t�ilutrr:_�SCnLe �' CITY 0 RANCI IO CCC;kNK), \Ci1 PLANNING DIVISION i:�nn ;rn_ SCALE:�.. jl- L NORTI I s .yam CITY OF ITFAI: it.\,Ncl 10 CUCAMONGA 'Fil-1.1+070 9&S PLANNING DIVISION ENIIIIIIF: -r- S(:,\I,E!- (f/ Id - Ll • ✓ V NORTI f CITY OF ITEN 1: OZ 05 Op Z RANCI 10 CUCAN KAGIA TITLF:2��ffs Ull~ • PLANNING DIVISION FNI 11111T, -r-Sr- SCAM: ^, 7-7 Z--'.-r AP r q10 Ll • ✓ V NORTI f CITY OF ITEN 1: OZ 05 Op Z RANCI 10 CUCAN KAGIA TITLF:2��ffs Ull~ • PLANNING DIVISION FNI 11111T, -r-Sr- SCAM: ^, • • �n G, a.w 0 U.M& I am 14 lu- nT. .. g NI )RTI i CITY OF ITEM: RANCIIO CUCANIONGA 'rrr1.1.T{ PLANNING DIVISION FNI IIIiI i': _M!1. SCALE ', ,J � •' C CITY ON RANCI IO CUCAtI( NGA PLANNING DIVISION' 61ff IT6>I _.- .lLl_ -� 30700 • u NORTH 0 J \ORTI I C I n oi. ITEM: I la RANCI O CCGAJIONGY A TITLE: d PLANNING DIVISION FNI1181T: �-5 CITY OF RANCI IO CUC NK)NGIA PLANNING DIVISION 0 0 NORTH ITI I: -ir Z 3 Z TITI,E _..MLP G Z • EXI llBlT:, : •Z scmx: ^-� 0 0 3 Trv- cin, oi., RA-NCI X) CUCAMONGA MANNING DIVISION 1,7 ITEN11 "T Vz 63 to Z ENI Hill P Z!?O,-P SCUT; 01 C�- V INORTI I ( C N6F/ G [nw M' !cam* •...0 ,Of iv, CITY OI' ITCJ is _ -- iT Z 30 Z RANCI K) CUCANK)-\G1 TITLI! A Omwii afar ko PL; NNING DIVISION I Xl unrr. _ SCALE, '""_ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART i - 1Nrvxma'P1UN SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. • PROJECT TITLE: RANCHO CENTER ASSOCIATES /FOUR FLEXES 4a APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (714) 989 -1767 _ 7333 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 RANCHO CENTER ASSOCIATES NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Douglas K Hone 7333 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. Ca. 91730 (714) 989 -1767 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Easement From S,In Bernardino Flood Control District I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 22 Four Plexes /Planned Develoo ^ent on approx. 6.4 acres ** Z At*aehad nroje * description ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 6.4 acres (annrox.) Existing dwellings will DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON 'TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): F e vacant. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. C, J I -2 / c, • WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO r1 LJ 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? 9. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? _x S. Remove any existing trees? How many? 55 _ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above:_ Ridge on the southerIy II,IPORTLI.NT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Rd�''hoo CenfOr AASS4c�i ates Oato Jami_iry 20,__L9R 3Signature 6y: pUglas K. Hone Title General Partner I -3 7/ C � RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION • The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.:�an h r(' n�ciates Tent. Tr. No. Specific Location of Project: 29S' snnrn nP thr_ ASV Corner of AacPline nr_ S Hellman Avenue PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: N/A 2. Number of multiple 22 Four Flexes family units: 88 Family Units 3. Date proposed to begin construction: Sept. 83 4. Earliest date of • occupancy: Jan. 84 Model and 4 of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range ** Four Plex units are not being built for sale but will be retained for rental purposes Twenty -two (22) three bedroom units sixty-six (66) two bedroom units I -4 r • • RESOLUTION NO. 83 -35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,. CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12362 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12362, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Rancho Center Associates, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a development of 88 units arranged as four - plexes on 6.4 acres, located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman into 23 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 9, 1983; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: • SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12362 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the 49 property within the proposed subdivision. -7J Resolution No. 83 -, Page 2 • (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12362, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Temporary landscaping, including 15- gallon size trees, shall be provided along both sides of the access road to Base Line. 2. The temporary access road to Base Line shall include a sidewalk to provide separate pedestrian access to the project. 3. A wrought iron fence, specimen size trees, and mounding shall be provided in the Hellman Avenue Streetscape. • 4. The emergency access lane to Hellman Avenue shall be constructed of decomposed granite overlain with topsoil and grass. 5. Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel .Map 6395 shall be continuously maintained in a good condition, free from weeds and debris. ENGINEERING DIVISION 6. Parcel Map 6395 shall be recorded prior to recordation of the tract map or the issuance of building permits. 7. All conditions contained in the resolution of approval for Parcel Map 6395 shall also apply to this tract, 8. Installation of a portion of master planned storm drain across the subject property from Base Line to the existing Cucamonga drain with all on -site and off -site easements shall be required. The cost of installation of the drain shall be credited to the storm drain fee and a reimbursement agreement will he executed per Section 8 of the City Ordinance No. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the fee • amount. 7q • Resolution No. 83 Page 3 9. An in -lieu cash deposit shall be required for street improvements along Hellman Avenue for future installation. 10. An access road from Base Line Road shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 11. A temporary asphalt paving sidewalk shall be constructed on the west side of Hellman Avenue from the railroad tracks north to the existing sidewalk. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Yom, r I /Anni • `""�• crest of ti trMtss is I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of ,Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOUT, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 7� DEPARI:lot OF LO•:"I ;bILY DEYELOPMEHi �5. Prior to any use of the Deject site or business act,Ry belnq Cormenced P•ereoa, all CondiUmrt of ]arrant cuntl u'j Errr.n snail 5180.LftD CU:IOIIIOYS be Caaglrled to the satisfaction of inn City Planror- �/' 9 6. A detailed On -Site Lighting Plan shall Rr sslo-Ilyd for re Iry and SUIJCQ: � / /__ approval ey the Plan iaq Division Drmr to ns "once of casliling AP:LICAa I: _ -/L _ - - - --s -_.S_ to Coll ew �-d�� -�J J Permits. Such plan shell Indio to style, Illu'rmaLmn. lolltlon, he and Method of shislding, as not to adversely Affect adjacent yL.,t /f.�2> T nn / properetes. LC 4(: U..: } (GHQ _�_- �2_[� -Ff-'� /r�.l� _ P X ). All comiaA ti, raolln9 shall be a oars a0le N•he -lot �lho[e H,w,v We<Y ed are Conditions of anprnv al. ololtso tlr ^S to the style. A zennle of the root matenal snail he sin Il Plena mg Division for viol ex end asVrnval prior [n Issunn:e a( SupLt CUYfdCf TIE Pl A'.S i9G OIV;S lU9 FOR COIIrL IAMCE WITH i11E FUiIOAlA6 M1ul ld fug perms[,. S. All root a p, rtenan:e:, nun ill nn be 't•ulrr A. Ylee o"its _ ar<hl 11.11nn'!raniV st ths' " ""first ....to,,J, ¢w a s inN trim adjacent t and [n ee a I:y and 1. vela -•u[ art re+ anprnv sl gull e:mre, unless e[tendel by the ingeDivi ions. s he included dlel lie s.1 Building Divisions. U![ai l: shell he Inc lnJeA m Ca rid mq Plies. _ nnarp nn, J •ni p ^r-. are ot sort or approved tG3j emdn sham LF,e Lni Pe date o19. e d.m not c. +�cr. ntnm Pigh te,•n us, of All ,punning boa is installed at the Ume Of initial il.e Plnr -•lot shall +: cra.al. be mpple.neneae wuh solar nraund. 2. fa•nnrtlonal Use Petri approval is granted for a period of 10. ientarlacd n,d,,t,i,n p.rt M1,ays acv z cu Taboo ifs its span be zm nthsyea n:e Plammn, eomnlsslon at that tome no provided Wrouyheat the nevi nnme.,i [rworet ,..enuigs .,In ape. -sin —:r by motor, or deleting conditions or reva4e the Condibonel spaces and red rational uses. Use ver�nit. / 11. If re rr ntr'alirrd Lresn lei a is is,J, all L, a SM1 pits -„p en X r l +lot it I— Ira,, nip r,,,-.l mall exp ve, anlr:s ertemlri or t - meepta[ r,r shall be for Individual ltz with ell Cep teclrs shirld ^d fm. �1J. Plan :• Con. If tM1^ find :.I.I IIC. ro" IS but any pnhl if VI P +. unit VaJr tired :ed ,thin t+=_nty-fonr (24) the from the approval f the r aj C<L �12. (II) are be rrr lnS "J'aJ a R sc ^.t high m,a,dvW[xr hi r o"POintru'sn' high I gates par slot Pty aO@ 3. SI_[e_O ^v_r_In_:, +rn_t aalerds. Lv[]Hpn shall be inlrl CCt to ai•: "tint Ly rl v.n n.; '" Div is ton. y h]II be d<rI.oJed in a nri u¢e with the approved site plan[ an !I Seem tn^ PI wnmg Division and the conditions contained herein. _ IJ. Street fou -S shall be revie,ed and n;prov l by the City rl m,.v, In vrdance nth the adapted Street Usmng Policy pr ,cr to .,;;F,. 'I Y2, xen ze] pit, a1,,, and hu, Id ing eleval ... I m<arpurallny all dad rewrdatiun of the final tract M,. . ` nnmtlon5 of , vat shall be submltie] for review end approval by 1 o - Planning Oivisl n prior to Issnan..e of eund,ng permits. s )< It. All building's numbers and Individual units shall be idiu (,fled , n a [Isar autl concise manner, Including proper Illminllmn. ]. rl ,twos, and All site plans, plant, 1]n6edpe and i G,[ lung t, ier,r[In prnr[n^nt yian; gull be;a [nm.ls[en<Y prior 15. Local and Ills[er Fgue lull to prdr, l of bermes, yn r to mss m for c se ae to final en A Wranghout the tones , c nplanre wrtM1 tar Fit ¢,fi,. Lill Pl sn n in acct -th ef,j loildmg d use powencl of a useom lo[ subd,vix ion, o approved use has cent enced, wnl<never f custom Cl tletaipal enn^zlnan stub plan mL mtunl .,.I L'.:. cues its[. mCrl condaiIPst lino log and w•M control, I acwnlan[P with City A-4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections ei on, ed nrroya Ian Lr ail :ctaingd oven �ngs, shwa li s snb+i L[a•] for rtes^+ ]of v;! rv[anl,ent of apprvvna by We Planning Uprio ion prior to aofai bl of this toning nce all other dppins lP City Ordinances, dud , ths app ,l NP final Tract nap, and prior to approval 01 ,stud[ inyrore vent end inity plan applicable c plans or iGec ll lc plans In [!feet at the time of 9ratling plans. Bu Jd mg Permit Issuonce. I... Xtc. I r Ir tnr r +. Its. cowl ll!ties and Resvlctions (fez's) and f - ;..t rths cf In :oq ura ch Of urr It.'envaerS sSOCI at ion, 5miect to •)1 tt Cl ar.n:nl ach en S: peer in, 11:v IS :nn, and 1:'e e,:y ]lt •"'p z•nll l.' ,^Neel .LLn this nA ties a ccpY provrdcd to t're C. Oran t•:nal 'e _ \ ! 5)hd are " r drhra, s my dud bolls and locks shall be w a J l.. l on ._..1. In., ln!,I, _$. S!o,f,IV L_no.a s", as window lohz ^,fill be hv'wlled on each unit. 3. all units within pn: de,ejoprent mall be py,,I,rlbd to be adapted 1J' a z]I]r w r 0."tIry rrn �[. —F, i. E.r'r ;J c e t r.lf nip n r.a is and appl jar ces are reom red to he Inc- '1st .'l.. ^'L t.) :a1 In-lc - Inn, nct Ir, ltn set is b.' zgry ., la: .I I: pan.Ja,I pees, ea,,cj I p.uh h.". 'llct 11 ss 5. Ih.z .r,li p 11,11 an notion to hewn, buyers to purchase a s .lar A. C..c l l 11) Iallts 9,111 be construct,I with fire roUrdant material and n n .. 1. 1.1.11, rc,f 'It-W. �w ). En par .I,z, ant 1,01yap !fig :Iran be p1. en ny ;,IJ LJ a -t at tan o ) In,, r Cep[ab le 1. ,Y. Ii Pi ll1 rr11 a 1 ra. : R or ba've su Len 1111 a to the P11, I,.g u1, lz l s:, " I"it m_rt fir rbe pit h, ii l s. Vor. letI :.all vnl• A _ rc.ol of affordable on !I,, 1.!I). rrt1, at Pl.m nor y dL.Is r.l gel l,5'L.�rI f'f m..l In L'+ C •wW na TcL l.[y zcsll b. ), Jet ^ oncI " cut rt ). I. 'I Iatcz, a rrl It loll It Ire t "I I nztfnitll fit U., y,Vs t r r ,,. Irr fit [n such Suoo be ap ,ere sty the City Clan fir -r to , a of Cnndln) pe ats. P,or a + at ,,l and rrcnrnm .m or Inn fl.ul map. or 1111.1 w I If L11 lA r'1 I- (nits. o Iil ........ ... P •s in ,r iv,..(, ,urn <rrU M1ral v.I rmn all a t I " led Scbuul Gist n its, till 1, 1 :11'"ttcl t'I Ir' wrL:.fit of L. Ito Coca ll.. 5 A,, "I'm "hc),i n:Il,prz a in be r .IJe of a relit nG Stud. to 5_ let by ton 11. 1-. or Sacn letter fir curt if kits., vest have bnen ISS 'tl by the School Jlztrict within n nett (911 days prior to the final n approval +fie c of m1 uldiloismn nap o. asuance of serious in the case of fit other reSWmtial 11.11cts. OWA fin/ f. Lardsgp.inq 2X I, r. d,.ullea lanasc clef Irr nn: fill, chill, slnr•' Ill, shall hem s:,l'm Lni stir "I) dhp) ill r fir I'la - +.1 Illt,r prior to the ante If �bulWv.g pc: Iona p. v, in I u I 1 `/ alploval m the 11 ^51 .I a cu4un at :nS L. s l:m. Ix Z. islh,g toll vhall be retained .berpvlr ydsz,bie. A ma3ter plan of �I,tic, trees snowing filial, n,b, 11, Inmuon, s 1 11 and tl re Ilia I I be In,. I L led to and a;yrovr.l by the PI.nn Ih, 0'a Il ion el for to a vat o' the rough bra l.., plan. Said plan shall tile min a ted llr: ple,asld r Ali In,, what trees All' to be 1, 11 mud, 1, r uy . Veers. ^let .berg now lreez LIll be planted for fey lac e+•it of rnd.dcI br.z. vrojert no. lo. Prior to approval and recordation of III final map, fir prior to 15sn IDCe of I, I If I.I .. rim I when no map Is I Av.) I ea, written per t it ¢+tlow can, "..'it,1_1 rater dntn[I, Ihat ,I, lrte I, err m tnr 1111,a_1 and veal', fdcl ltlp3 Are or will be ^rill lah In +o sr v •, prolec [, shall be sub :nitrd to 1h, V. I',-_nt of Cti vn: ty Je ve lop ant_ Such letter mnzt nave be I,,iVJ by the It r :i,s Intl w rtt. In .aty (90) days prior In I..at mr, door vet rth1 ! ' sWJly is o of 111.1 is In the o all Still, mlan ,an" t i, l ro jo,t. For projects Its,, Septic lack fulucz athe aliotlwble by 5.',nta Ana Reg i::al 'w'iL, control 2uarl and file Clty, rlttan eltvr:ea,cun of . . . . I :ill'. rc Ind mg all amYU llvr I t ormation. :fall M. Oclal —I a:J YIolIU 1 to +Ire city. 11. This Subdivision was not snba lte,3 05 a trial JevOOP—t plfkagp and -- IS "In"Id to reapply for a point III,.., relative to N.'. desl;n ilctien Of the Growth Ydnagelent Oldmar -II prior to final aphro':al and niO11111no of 11,1 nap. o. r.,rkmZ vrhf afar ^toss 1. All 1114 mg lot IandSCa,c] islands s4ill hive a cmf r'. ovazlde dmc.. inn of 5' and shall conical. an Ic' ralk adJlcmtn to pukm9 Stall linclnhng 2. Parking lot tries shall b1 a 11 15 ynnon Size. P,'mrt•d t i a tafva i5 of 10 feet 1153 thin these ilnre I I'm ^r of Um l A 11 Lh....... Vr or each park rng nay. 3. All park l ng Spaces fly 11 be Slr Ired per Cllr st andarn draw r n, s. a. All units shall be pr.Ynh,d vital antmaa :rt 9,,,,e Jovf openers if driveway is less than 20 feet in (fifth. X S. Ibe Cann ay. (ooJp3 and Rrt✓.e Urns 51.111 reztnct the It I!, cf rec:e,:ufnal venl[les In a thI,. ind -s. Ov, are tee r.:, u'. L• Z41, n or co."I'taU lh. .II i,1h n,II I. ,. Intenur Urcu 4Um, aR its sill. r t,a, .n f.t sign rte1 ,I -, It or nv +n) aria3. fin/ f. Lardsgp.inq 2X I, r. d,.ullea lanasc clef Irr nn: fill, chill, slnr•' Ill, shall hem s:,l'm Lni stir "I) dhp) ill r fir I'la - +.1 Illt,r prior to the ante If �bulWv.g pc: Iona p. v, in I u I 1 `/ alploval m the 11 ^51 .I a cu4un at :nS L. s l:m. Ix Z. islh,g toll vhall be retained .berpvlr ydsz,bie. A ma3ter plan of �I,tic, trees snowing filial, n,b, 11, Inmuon, s 1 11 and tl re Ilia I I be In,. I L led to and a;yrovr.l by the PI.nn Ih, 0'a Il ion el for to a vat o' the rough bra l.., plan. Said plan shall tile min a ted llr: ple,asld r Ali In,, what trees All' to be 1, 11 mud, 1, r uy . Veers. ^let .berg now lreez LIll be planted for fey lac e+•it of rnd.dcI br.z. -3- 1 )7 J. Sa.o e t•.'. _ . -n+ by ^S"ilinn srar o lar9 "s. bill be rn[,nJnJ r[ne plan F. Stint t rtt +ih l City a'dante ,nth 1., trr or I` I• a not 1still, r ••I urtn ^it lnr signs finny rA on thr SJ A rr 'v rt Irrvs hr I,' City of Rm-ni Coc aac'rga enA 11 Lc CI enV•I a[ in, , 1 eppron l5 Lrry z+T's pr W"'•'J Inr tl:n •D+ ^Lq -• : !• v: ✓C - 1 at .+,� 01 r..y J9' on rn [fnnr sVeea e+] ?J' a:r e,t Pr for + °, + "� n [null: ah" wr14 Inr S". Orarmm�• + -.1 tall _ .. :.... appnutJOn and ..rov,a by Inr V'lamvng U+ +n,.n V+nr to � • .rr n.rtz arr co .,. s`n ar Re to 11". 11, +nllallatmn or any 519+5. a T, ..1 A r ,•-4nau t .Sa.:.l •nor- on.- xveiav +c":: 2GYN' b',. or +:, 2. A si,. Vro9•em Inr this deaeloP^nl :na fl Le 1•,r -Itt¢a tr to I,�; roI -1i +li,•.. f -n still., I'll . nn,lbrn , pi'loth, On +t jolt it, thew rev lrr and a.. oral pn r [o rturaa_ of `. �O) - of I C1 It th, :reas plant Pa within the project, shalt loldinr) vcrrt¢1. •I __t v:�' il: •�. X 1. Ov ec [orY mnnuacnt si dnl s) dull be Cravidcl for aC a•Irrn [, X_ 4. height a 2:i :I ; ,^ t [tilt of !i+^ (:I ref[ In ¢rota! M1P+ and of tan l, nLl + te^ in libobo inlpm ar tanlnooze p"jec[t. l .... ant r 2:1 •`r 1- .1 still be I Lb,' of aann,n fill v "11. G. A_ dd it tonal APP r vpainclh i PeP!rLil re d r pf,' ,. I.-al'—.1 . S. 1, 1 I. I; blular t ^l 1—` rr 1. Uxve Ion t 'hall he p nr [o -_ _ ..... .! z. 1. 1 tb;o Ill.ua IxUfr t /n BwuL nrr I rprrr. _ jZ -56q v ' t o-, U. c,, : ( d appropriate g-untl - n tat ,, tract I'. n •111,:..1 �\ ]. :1 r,r 1 iI'l in all z1.ne plrn,..l r; r + + bill M m 'rtt e+. ar .n it apV'oval pr.jlnF /ii (- h. —t" r :..y + n.lrun nv tl..n .ln n.l ^p^ It r>nl Pnar to rc I.-a, nl 11. Utnrr AOennes r•iv,'ml 1 :+11 nr r•.J 1- -1 by tb, b I. olc .pfry n.. to :1 r. tt• a. cr.Pecnan ... 11 M1x IndwC 1 Ly tnr ?C I. b— „lney ...avlar, carts shall M1r pY•, : -A m ..r r..l.wr -r .rth Filar"ml Tvs...a [n .'•[•v one oa; n iz in s,ti,facttury oan !+loon. /X Foothill Fire r.,t+ctlou Un:n<[ W �9 .111 jo,ju nu.l a.•„wth.ill bet r• atainrl 5 d health aul Willing c Ii V• In.. lr'at teas, be T nl .11'111 i'r X2. Y - _ ,doo,r acres shall hr Provt Atvl, utrr ` +[lion rn out a..... r, _e n of ?a f,,t u+J•` at all t.'rt Il r n•1 c ntr. t •ir ^I Filth Foothill Fire UIStr cl YP•j'l1Y” 'n t: 9. too [ y,r,l teens :Yai' +n�, and a >{V[opr is L^ 1 r+qd tl on 111t(m 11-all [[ed Prior 1[11 trot — hr i ill•`J L+ tn.` Aev rlo'J ^r m ettardan[e r,tn zanini plans nt. pvc . ton v \� ]. rl , Ll to s e+n<e of ,r It kd to 'n [z I•r .. e+ldrn tl all be snl.+rt led Inr Inr ,1•!1.11 Ivr Ilr:b ,ct I "LL at raj er 5.111p 1Y ill r11P pro lr. t+c..+ +t .1+]+I +L Ir. p...1, n, 1111. w.r lli. I: +..IX 1i. r1. a.W Ir.e Im,l d, :r :d the Prrn ter panuaY+. a •h. , IaMupw pl hit and iLa 11 eu.lrlet Inn of rcoa n.d fr:e Pro Ireton ..y.,t. •:. Z2 o v.. .+LS t1111 [lu.!.�d r nd•ny'l [ t1 v: %+I LY o1e pl mrml Omn wrl. {, bre tlrall CnrLL +`.t tire` 11.5. Pvaal $cry ae to d. L. hilt+ P" `ill. . 5. �', ^<I _�.. upnllu'R Appr,V Lip typo and ln_a tJOn I, n+I bus. :L•::al :n 1:c,.c '.. ,: r..; saa es.0 o. int J11.. i,l ocz. t. T -L Vt n i+tl..,lzt (tn in r:r U. 11 .r,l r •In[ ItVI ng•) 5, This prtaar[I raj is within it Routh, :- i Rr, -I: i' . a, ';I J•r. ant 11. -n5�lu l ldn l:<.,, nl. t ,1 V.,rrI a,.11, ij.' -1 �.4�a• rs— - -- ; +1[r[1pe: ,n ny 1'.P Nm[M1n I:r.. ...1+ t.I ,. :. ,� •a f+ If preJe[t, •+11 rewire re uu and ai•p pv el ..- d.. +vb.It •nt ply„• Py `Y I•t(r.+ Sn 111 ]x nits -n I, dro it dr .1. - +la [+.,n:, e'n�,9,t l+, 111-ty. z � yl +, ,: t (e -: _ tal ^'art PI "[ +'' + -• ^I1 +I r "oupe, et;. Permits from other agrn set dll be ....I-J as 1•d l...;: < 1]. .11 Vv :: ^t "r la'. G<+I'cJ {•trt.ayz art rryw+red [a Le ase—I +It. tn^ III: _ _ _ __ ___ A. Cit.nt, -pn "ll..... sInt.rI d6tnct. — or 11 1 I•, B. tml+ny o.nt n „iEo �T -1111T �-- p'' Ia. Land sc fo,ng and + ng+t ion sr: [r Vi n`pu ireA to be Irlstai leA on P 011,: — San gy V"rnitl. San ” and mo Cpnoay Flood Con trnl 91st n e[. — rPA¢- r -tt n the m this [ra[L area than br inotinuonlly _ D. nta.n..d [nr u relax, +mtn Cepted by [I,e [i tr and anne.ei r[. — mco the Imuscapr .na,n. man[e dsv d -3- A soils report siren he prepared by a dalifl,d ev91 -er lgrnsra by ran I., ae.r:na.J and ... •rnaof to rest _�`'z. the State of California to perform ..n .... s. l Cnmr[Y =a rr District ICCA07. FooO•II ,•�vrr :11111 era l th Poll tv..,t of err: Chun I, or A la9lcal repnrt sea 11 L. prepared by a .nli!¢d engln.rr Dr -• Of ",I ...0 Lon CCs] u11 be I,a"J _]. gee ge login and sobmrt I,J at the ti -e or aAl¢r.,an f,r qr lil., plan ,l check. F_ ^.Il plJS Dlel+ir \�, A rebel, graam9 plan shall be le-i M ana cppro ¢a LY Re Grad Lp -C C.mnrtre prior to r nvlallan of t!" final ","'v Smn rli tee 1. slue II _�Irl t final r"Ildo , plans shall be camplebJ arrrl app-p,...l prim tr r,.eance A. 1. - Ire:,: > :rl c -a nUr to, I:t "t M"Lrd unicorn CJ na 10, at on n 1.11-9 pr:r mru. t -.c 'IIr nII —n Plu 0" C..J.:. eat sun :l n:ll S. As a Coattailet sabd, ,on. he felle.ing rPgni«meat, Shall be 11: - aLrp:r[aole c•:J :s, oIdal cr2 a'rl _ r: -a n2 :r e11. : 1[ tr., bate 01 I, r.aace of rr lv LrvP perm -r t5. ac d. Surety SbJll be Posted and J tree - ?n[ 1 ¢pled gu,r antes mg Y>. mr a nn enJen[w due miry cnr.p let of all on - site Jr. Ina JP leis n los r ceSV r for -�-` 1rI r _ 1:r n,rl nn9lip -1,11 i:(,$), the ape n ca +t ;w tl J?,ater ing an wrc e11 . w the zallsraC. con of the oa nJln, a,•.1 , -qt) .r aJ :r nl,n b a --tied n `- tees tar Ire L, 1e, -,jr II' /.' Safety Drvis inn pr IDr to re urdat lap or thl cap. .1, rt t ... ... .s•rel r ach It - _ l p,: Our n-'r -life ,,an In,. Pau In- "a : Irlaml y^ -en ts, for sIfO drz Svl Of Ilia inr :: r that b. ' ?t f•e• Pern It JrJ Plan CLefklag Fe,,, - - - all coriace d oont 1 pare• S, are to 1•J hrlev:•4 are cJc,. fed onto o r .Ili pa 1 ,c .a1 n S. L10-1 nnJ recnNUJ la tLe sat is /aclfpn of [h. D.ilIn19 end Sal etY he ;J of bulalJ ley Orrni l for a nM eel l al fir, Divismn, -., t I I "I Strrg Jeotill,C'rt. tie o l On -sit d - 9e I'nprov rents, +v:vy for ^.ate- n Or nee 1 a I Y 1.:i 1 l tl -e .s'a`dism. i ra1P. Sur - n o protect" J the rblic "a'd prnpertrr:, v 1 l: e^ r :allot " I.r La, nit be Iim .CJ in. SYiteni DCVCIO>:.e•t FCr• rss fiance of build -n9 Deli - is for cmrs V•.ct p- boon -, p reel IJ1.t `l L"1, F.,, .. ^It a'.1 Pico CLrck m9 Fees. - r, nm SrNJrc[ to .rnj atel "I a I'll, 't Iea11n9 or "thin a idol re tat rvC to oh", J Ln rla rr9 p1 I, i. Sbe-t alb ei s es learn be pra -,!nd by the Coddling Of RCial. .....sled. • d. Imal .radial plans for cad- pare rl In lr v.l..•sIld to IL• 10711,1^ -. it'r the umfon Balding Con for property ILw Cltl fall J and $d CLY Iry r Van for ova fl I1 r.r to - ol Ll ca r.ICr.rI; o... area and fir...... stivenes5 of ellstrnl n r [ . Karla ing pernr. ts. finis nay be n I rat 11 11,11, !a .1 b uIt 30 GJS IS.) shall e, r'rJ, to c.Oply Nth <,r,.t Gall -1 n. a • Ubidding e All boa j, In see cs fit lrac (5) I..�[ Ir 1, -.1 -c ll r5 11 dull Ir z l•1 . nti.1 _� 7 rat for the m,PnJed use Dr the Shall 1.1 ",h, of S:I r 9rr LLrr slaps :I O - Jl l.o - -1 lac ..•1 of e rvel yla'ra.a _ •n a'p lepor of ,ladled a1 5•. oll I lulml ".111 bar 1 valetrl In V., r:IrC lr- of n0!1a9 •PEnna a., S J15nas al poi II pes Old 11 be ,ad. f l fed .I-1 /or OII¢raf and City Irr nlrtr.- -r 11 fr p.'-. : J la ule an'I n rntem g•wtlh IUr a N' -r•.1 0 6 welly ,;p ^I tI 1e ply .11, Lr Gmfore Pin,binJ Coder ana follera 5,1il.Imq oltlon,a r g:r -r r v g11cr A. L'n ler4foynd on-site utilities are to be located and h..n on building Ullbr.r[p IIIG DIVISIO. plans s.bni tt ed for al ilJ ing perm« application. L. D.Jrm_ tlon and Vrelcbl_ar Access x. Dr_eii, 1. Dedications shall be made by rival ran of all ntrrior strert ngal- 1. Ln]v9 of the subject property shall be in accordance rich the of -bays and all necessary easements at Shp,. en tao 1-1,10- r- / un- /ern Bvrld rnq Ca,I City Grading S:aodards and accepted grading pnc;real. Ine final gnad-, plan shall be in substantial can(ornmce .,in [fie approved 0 .... plwl gnJin, plan. i. 0•'1icz Upn ;Oa 11 he 'mN of the to l lowing right- of-ays on the following sheet": .,I,, icast het n het on _— ___ - - -- ell.1 —.1 feet ° - 3. Car:or property line radius will be required per City Standards and dranngs. a. All rlpitz r °r _o,ular ingea to d g-ess from hall be ded located ted a" f oli o., Avlt•sv_heTxc?rj�2&r* . X,:&f _dncosway -. - -- S. R.•a to in IfCesS a t +ts a:t 11 1 mtrnance agreements nts o�Snr I ng access on JI P11-11 ,mt) —rl mot -t ce or all —vi . drove., r Pak.., a iall a Provided oy MA-1 and hill be oded t one yr rent with ✓m sag. 6. Ale,nate .........; ;hall be axle for the ingress, egress and internal col sc ion of any I :u - I, which .,It be used for delivery of ,,do to the p.op—ty or in th- operation of the proposed business. 1. Pnva[e d•a Ewae clam ^,es for cross -lot drainage shall be required v \� YY" and "hill ho d•l,o -t-1 or noticed on the final map. 00 S. All elision, easexnes lying within future right -of -way are to be A�r ou,tcli—j or to be delineated on the map per City Engineer's ........ is. 9. Easements for Sidewalk for public uses shill be dedicated to the City en+re sidewalks ..sander through private property. R. street 1, oy,?ents _ 1. ennstr,ct full street improvements including, but not limited t°, curb and Ritter. A.C. pave ol. nsid walk, do-iv, aver coons. parkway tees g quirement of z valk will he governed by the provision of Planning Corm,sslon Resolution nn. 81-90. 2. A on Olson of 25 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -loot wide dedicated right Ol -.ay shall be most run led for all half- sec[Idn streets. 3. Construct the following missing improvements Including, but not limited to: `\ Prudent tin. 51RM NARE CUPS 6 GUTTER F.C. P'!ffi. SIDE- W.HC Ul APGR. STREET llGillS A.C. UR:LAV "'.E01,81 BLA'D ONES sa �l i+e X ,Y x ,r ,� X �felbnnl, X X ,Y x x ,Y 'Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (A a. Poor be any fort on mg Ger ld :sea in tn.+ Cobllt r -ef -. tv, loss shall be p.nd and a oteen[ perm, sell In City fngin.:.r s Off.,,. rnln eon rl ion to a +y btb.r 11—.11 —1— V.•t. S. Street im,,Pvrmnt pions ..cluing "okay trees .nd s,c.•t boll, approved by the City Enginrcr and Pomona by a :en r,..I Enginrcr shall be r..hn.:,I, for all t[r., rT.rvr •^ne. p.h- to I,.,ece of an encrea0innnt petit. Fort pl+OS net o•nl,le'. �s1, 11 snow the lacatl°n of all ea istmg lit. lily Tao F,ti vrth in Um n of -way. 1` -6. Surety snail be posted and On agre eat a t ^d to the sat is action Of the City Engi.,.- and the City Attomeyp ego tranteeing c,-,,let m-, of lore pool¢ imprwenen[s, p,!be to r °rJ ins of the map or the nv,aucn Of building Virmi[s, whichever co rcs first. 1. All Street improvements shall be Installed to the sitilfalti.n of toll, �/ City Engineer, prior to occupancy. —, B. Paw -t striping, a rr rking, traffic and s[et n v signing stall be installed per the requirements or the City Ermine,,. 9. Existing city odd ..,hiring reconstruction shall open for traffic al at it times will, aJegua d ^11.11 dolls, rc ,'.tr,rtinn or street el It permit on,, be ma. A d.•p, ,, all he Irq:lired to the cost of grating and p —rq, ) i,h s ,II he efunded n cover of the constrnctmn to if,., z,tislactim, of Um City Engineer. 30. Walkways shall be provided between WbliP sidewalks and on site pedestrian areas. 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. • 9, A hydrologic and drainage Study (or the project shall he submitted to the City Engineer for review. ,[{lines "e-<i 1. Provide all utility services to each lot including s.Altary sewers, .n[nr• electric poreq 9Is and telephone, 2. All utilities within the project shall be installed underground inclndsng utilities along major arterials less than li 8y. g. U:ili% easements shall be Provided to the satisfaction of the serving uIlJty companies and the City Engineer. e. De +eloper shall be responsible for the relocation of elisting public utilities. as required. -6— 6afnaae (la'nl trol 5. peve to per shall be responsible for the Initallat"A or street Il �nting w ant co, T {n ac[ordance with Soabhern California Edison Co +piny ant City �I lod ipp Jt be responsible for cnnstruttlon of ail on -site Standards. l relulrSJ by the City Engineer. Iaitl,t _n 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Z. Intersection drains all be required at the following locations: a .fi subject [ agencies Involved. Approval of the final so will be — subject to LO any regu irlmen[S that may be r[<c lvld efom [lice. P. General pequl cements and Tipped All yt y. —r— the Prlpos 1 pruJect "Ill wrth:n areas indicated as subject to s tip vb ill um er in. S,,1 flcaa Insurance Prayan and i subject to } 1. Final parcel and tract mzpz shall conform to City Standards acd Pe pronto, of t,ut p^ =,rain one City urdliall' tw. 34. procedures. 1( a A drainy^ cPZnrol arrviftr flood protection wall will be required to %/ 2. A parcel map Shall be recorded prior to firs[ phase subdivision to ` protst the structures by d,veCing sheet runoff to Streets, or to a �— prevent creation of unrecognized parcels. ,Ir- drain. �/ 3. Prior recordation, lti a Notice of Intention to form eon /or join b. it, -lute ,fours inns •nail nr axl^ for acceptance and disposal of and ligl,tri piste in mall b• filed rite le. Oil pe Li taunot so Jr a- •rat +True ;he Y areas I. The edeveloper. costs involved In District Por'ra; ion snail b. -cipt strd" property c. s dies. be required t!•1er of a-c+p[ frog property be borne by the developer. be borne —YY t f loois•nn runoff fr on :ne tract fbws on [o private properties. the _1 l• j.ha.e Valhi!)— Avr:fl'%Q_ mall be designed as a ,c.j.r water carrying t+t r•qu:r:ng onbination or special curb heights, rc1aY Mn-.Irive- epproacnes,- rolled street conneetfam, flood protectior. .Ills, and/or 6nJSCaped ... to h-sal..rale oiiM•<i•ne.ays'aL property _ lswn. S. The fella.... s m drain shall be Installed to the satisfaction of — m e City Engineers 9, A hydrologic and drainage Study (or the project shall he submitted to the City Engineer for review. ,[{lines "e-<i 1. Provide all utility services to each lot including s.Altary sewers, .n[nr• electric poreq 9Is and telephone, 2. All utilities within the project shall be installed underground inclndsng utilities along major arterials less than li 8y. g. U:ili% easements shall be Provided to the satisfaction of the serving uIlJty companies and the City Engineer. e. De +eloper shall be responsible for the relocation of elisting public utilities. as required. -6— C RESOLUTION NO. 83 -34 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 83 -02 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -3 TO R -3 /PD FOR 88 FOUR -PLEX UNITS, LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE, ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN WHEREAS, on the 1st day of February, 1983, an application was filed and accepted on the above- described project; and ''WHEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 1983, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. • 2. That the proposed Zone Change would not have • significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. That the proposed Zone Change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on March 9, 1983, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 9th day of March, 1983, Planned Development No. 83 -02. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 33 -02. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission • shall be forwarded to the City Council, q0�_ `J Resolution No. 83 -3( \ Page 2 4. All Conditions of Approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 12362 shall apply to this Planned Development. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTE! I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and • regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of March, 1983, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, STOUT, BARKER, MC)IIEL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • s G U �._i n u �o s V issioner Remoel stated that even though it is a large amount of acreage the r•. 's only one manufacturer. Further, with the huge trucks they will be using a is installation, the street would possi'b'ly be da;aged and it was better for ,,, to sustain the damage than the City. Chairman King state hat the parcel map provides the vehicle not to have only one ownership and he f that it might be better not to have a private driveway but rather a pubs- street. Mr. Sanderson stated that the ma urpose for subdivision is tax purposes. Further, that while it is true that ey can sell to someone else Ameron has actually drawn up a joint ingress and ess agreement that will be recorded along with this map which would take care the problem in the future. He stated that he does not see any problem if th egal document is recorded with the parcel map. Mr. Lam stated that it is very unlikely that a problem 1 occur given the use and condition of the site. Motion: Xoved by Hempel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, adopt Resolution No. 83 -33, approving Parcel Map 7847 and issuing a ®egatiu Dee laration. a a a a a NT AND Y' 1NNCU ucvowr ^.c :u -32 =1c - ,, - _ _ 12iodi - d. :7C]i7;S :fP3R - A change of zone from R -3 ulaple ramuy ,ias :wens all to i -3 (VUjtiple Family Residential /Planned Development and the dsveloaaent of 98 units arranged as four- piexes on 6.4 acres located south of 3ase Line on the west side of Hellman - ANI 203- 011-02, 04, 71 :licnael 'Jairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman King asked what the distance is from Base Line to the north end of this project. Mr. Gomez replied that it is 295 feet. Chairman KInr; stated that the General Plan shows the zoning on this as Administra.Je Professional. Mir. 7airin replied that this is correct. C,— iisstenor Stout asked wham ^.he difference is between 1-3 and R -3!PD. Vr. Vair:n explained the dif °e^ence between the base 4-3 Ind the R -3i PD overicy, Itat.rg tnat wi'lthe base you are liaitrd to a minimum !ot size and restrictive ootbac'cs. He indicated that with the overlay you may ose the land more e.fic :,ntly tnan unit �tnerwije dould be allowed. Plannin; "omm:uslon :!irl "3 sq.. • • • Mren ), 1363 :j �s • Commissioner Rempel asked what the estimated size of the storm drain ds. Ih•. Rougeau replied that he is not really sure but thought it would range _ around 43 inches and is intended to be a part of a major drainage system for the properties south of Base Line and for the Lion Street 5evelopment. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Nr. Coug Hone, general partner in the Rancho Center, than�ed staff for :be worx :hey did on a site with such extreme technical challenges. Cnairman :King asked if when the northern part of this project is developed for technical professional purposes, does the applicant see a conflict with the d? use in terms of traffic flow. yr. Hone stated that what is happening all over Southern California is the integration of mixed use and what future use this will have is predicted on what is happening now'. He indicated that this is the best ;kind of use for this property. Chai=zn King asked if Yx. Hone sees this as a private type of driveway or as a PUplic street. ',!Jr. Hone reoliad that At will primarily be a drive for the units to t rear for the access of the other two parcels which could take 25 percent. • Chairman askei if there will be a problem nelative to the drainage aspect and woad t'oe drainage need as it relates to the parcel to the fur. cone reolied ,.'at there W .11 be a ooniSticatad drainage system •..nicn wile miti3ati a site and will also solve the ori;;inal problem. Commissioner Stout stated that his underotanding is that there will be a sound attenuation wall between the railroad tracks and the units and asked if there will also be some additional insulation on the units. :one replied that the units will contain the highest energy requirements and standards which will take care of ;his prou Lem. Commissioner Stout asked what kind of roofing material will be used. fur. terry Cnriatiansan, arcnitact, reputed that it will be an aro'n it= ctural co- aositlon .roof 'which will look lice a slate er shale: root' and aonti :n three layers o:' .:ateria i. Co ra iosi�ner Stout asked if t.. L; roofing ratarial will produce a rani�l shadow affnat, and also, what color it will bq. r ^plied '.sit it will qe a dark ;:o :or Baum: tike I slate co:ar, • Plannin; ^.ollminsion Minetr; M :dr:n 9, I 113 Commissicner ?rliei stated that the drainage for this sae comes across fro.:o the northwest along the railroad and part of the property on the southeast • drops sharply towards the single family residential area. He asked if anything is being done to protect the people and property from the water f' -ow. :M . Rougeau replied that the nature flow through this will be a storm drain pipe from Base Line chrougn Lion Street and explainea the drain that aoula carry tie water. Mr. :'.one stated Chat they are taking above ground water and putting it underground at Vineyard and over to Cucamonga Creek. Mr. Hopson asked Mr. Rougeau if on the tentative map the City allows lots that are physically separated to have the same number. Mr. Rougeau replied that they will be numbered. Mr. Hopson stated that on the tentative they are shown without any description which would iraxe them very difficult to identify. Mr. Rougeau stated that these are shown like separate house lots and this would have to nave another designation which would probably be "D ". He indicates that this would have to be fine -caned when the final map comes througn. rhairnas ::.. - askaa that in terms of the area south of Bass Line and north of the pro pect, id e applicant have any problem with putting in some type of • ,grass for she purpose of aesthetics. M-r. none replied that be would have a problem because 'ne is gett n- ready to do sometning and he does not want to have to tear up any plantsd grass because it would be a 'waste of money. Com.•nissioner Ram pel stated that the conditions require that these two areas be maintained in a reasonable and clean condition. Mr. Hone indicated that some landscaping will be put in. C'nalrran Rln3 asked if it really costs that much money. Mr. there replied that he will be in there pretty quick and presently there are V acres of iirt which require irrigation. Further, that he will trim the area anti there r •grass that an be kept up. There ra i. ^.; no firtner lo.-•.:nent3, the punlic hear ;n,; was c.o:;ed. !Sot .on: 'hv ^d by nempa1, .econded by Stout, carried unanimously, to naopt Reso ldt ion :b. 33 -ii ioprv.n.; the Lose change from R -3 to 9 -3. PD for ?lannea D,velop- ^nt So. 93 -32. Motion: 11oved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolu Yvon So, 33 -35 approving Tentative Tract 12362 with the added condition that the area north of the tract be ;cent in a clean and raintained state. • ORDINANCE NO. �Ga AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 208 = 011 -02 AND 04, FURTHER DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 6395, LOCATED SOUTH OF BASE LINE, ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, FROM R -3 TO R -3 /P0, FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12362 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. • B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessor's Parcel Numbers 208- 011 -02 and 04, a portion thereof, further described as Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 6395, approximately 6.4 acres in size and located south of Base Line, on the west side of Hellman Avenue, is hereby changed from R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development). PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: n L J DI-7 Jon 0. MiM s, Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLCAAr°, STAFF REPORT C C > C DATE: April 14, 1983 �`— 197; TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development Director SUBJECT: ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN POSITION With the recent illnesses in the Engineering Division, particularly the loss of Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer (Development Coordinator) the Division is in a most critical state of understaffing. This is particularly exacerbated by the upturn in development activity, an extremely active design and construction program and the recent demands for disaster repair and documentation. In order to maintain any semblance of a professional engineering operation, additional staffing is sorely needed. Development processing is now such that it is competing with capital projects such as Base Line and Hermosa, Foothill and Hellman, the Alta Lana Channel and the • Beryl- Hellman Storm Drain. As you are aware, the Engineering Division has currently approved in the budget, but unfunded, an Engineering Technician position. This position if filled will assist in alleviating the development section, the City Engineer and the public works engineer from the technical and routine tasks that keep them from the major tasks that need their diligent attention. The current hospitalizations are causing enormous delays and disruption of service. The technician position can be funded from the RDA since there will be staff shift funding as a result of the Day Creek project that needs to begin this new fiscal year. The' Engineering Technician, while not a substitute for either the Assistant Civil Engineer or the Associate Civil Engineer will at least provide sorely needed help and relief. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize filling of the currently unfilled Engineering Technician position. Respectfully submitted, Jack Lam , AICP Community Development Director JL:jr 0 • I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM March 16, 1983 TO: City Council FROM: Richard M. Dahl, Councilman RE: Landscaped Medians -- Arrow, Archibald, and Base Line Road �p Gt7CAMp^C �^ 9 r� 'o REQUEST: I have had numerous requests that we study the need and impact of land- scaped medians designated for Arrow, Archibald, and Base Line Road. FOLLOW UP: In discussions with City Engineer Lloyd Hubbs, it was pointed out to me that the cost of just maintaining these medians would be in excess of one million dollars per year. In light of our city's financial crisis and the need to increase our park systems and the maintenance costs for parks and existing parkways, it would appear that we will need to reorganize our priorities (I have problems with landscape maintenance districts that cost the homeowner or landowner for unnecessary require- ments such as medians). CONCLUSION: I would respectfully request that this matter be referred to the Planning Commission. I do feel, however, that a median is necessary in front of the high school to discourage "jay walking" once our traffic signal at vineyard is installed. RgD:mk l,' 1977