Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992/07/15 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. July 15, 1992 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 www City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Pamela J. Wright, Councilmember rw+ Jack Lam, City Manager .James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989 -1851 0 City Council Agenda PAGE July /5, 1992 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing- The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such Items. A. CALL T9 ORDER 1, RollColl: Buquet_, Alexander_, Stout_, Wiliam_, and Wright_ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS Q. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any Issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per Individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. I. Approval of Minutes: June 3,1992 June 4,1992 June 17,1992 June 18. 1992 (Williams absent) June 30, 1992 July 1,199'2 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos, 7/1/92 (FY 91 -92), 7/1/92 (FY 92 -93), 7/8/92 (FY 91- 92),and 7/8/92 (FY 92 -93); and Payroll ending 1 6/18/92 for the total amount of $3280268.85, 3. Adoption of Measure I five -year capital improvement program 13 and twenty -year transportation plan as requested by SANBAG to Provide a public record of the intended use of local Measure I funds, City Council Agenda PAGE July ts, 1992 z RESOLUTION NO, 92 -213 13B A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY -YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE I FUNDS 4. Approval to amend revised revenue and expenditures for 14 Community Services for Fiscal Year 1991/92. 5. Approval to appropriate a total of $1,008,O00 from Reserve Fund 15 (94- 3901 -7901) ($382.690.04) and Redemption Fund (93- 3901 -7905 ($625.309.96) to the Redemption Fund (94- 4130.7920) to call bonds within A.D. 82 -1 R (6th Street Industrial District) and a total of $169,950 from Reserve Fund (97 -3901 -7901) ($54,372.85) (5116.611.57) to call bonds within A.D. &-2 (Rancho Cucamonga Drainage). 6. Approval of Contract (CO 92 -040) for the collection of special 17 assessments between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Auditor /Controller - Recorder, County of San Bernardino. 7. Approval to execute contracts for Computer Hardware and 19 Software Maintenance with NBI, Inc. (CO 92-041) In the amount of S 15A70, Prime Computer (CO 92-042) in the amount of $36,100, and Westek Computer Services (Co 92-043) in the amount of $47.100.00, to be funded from Contract Services Account Number 01 -4159- 6028 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. 8. Approval to execute Professlonal Services Agreement (CO 92- 20 044) with Pavement Management System, Inc. for the preparation of a pavement management system for the entire City Including the curb, gutter and sidewalk inventory. The cost of $15,730 ($14.300 plus 10% contingency) will be funded from account number 32 -4637 -9110. 9, Approva! to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and file a Notice of Completion for Tract 13664, located on the east side of 2Z Haven Avenue north of Church Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 5140,000.07 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $14000.00 City Council Agenda 0 PAGE July 15, 1992 3 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -214 23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13664 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 10. Approval to release Labor and Material Bond for DR 90.05, P4 located on the northeast comer of Hellman Avenue and 9th Street, Release: Labor and Material Bond (Street) $165=00 I. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12671 25 - traffic signal located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $IODM.00 12. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 26 13444, located on the southeast comer of Fairmont Way and Milliken Avenue Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $50)612,00 13. Approval to accept Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue street 27 improvements and parkway and median landscaping master planned storm drain, Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. Also, acceptance of substitution bonds for interior tract improvements and release of existing bonds for Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, loeded on the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street. Rele-a i Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13748 5106DW.00 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13857 S94A00.00 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) Faithful Performance Bond - Trod 13858 $98.000.00 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) City Council Agenda PAGE July 15, 1992 4 Faithful Performance Bond -Tact 13748. 13857, 13858 $I,(A3DD0.00 (Infrastructure - Brock Homes) Accept: Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13748 $344=.00 (Interior tract improvements - Gruen Homes) Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13857 S228A66.00 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13858 $262.739.00 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) Maintenance Guarantee Bond $150240.00 (Milliken, Banyan, Landscaping, Storm Drain - Brock Homes) RESOLUTION NO. 92-215 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUSUC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MILLIKEN AVENUE, BANYAN STREET, AND THE LANDSCAPING AND STORM DRAIN ASSOCIATED WITH TRACTS 13748, 13857 AND 13858 AND AUTHORONG THE FIUNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following Items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 0 City Council Agenda PAGE July 15, 1992 5 1. CONSIDERARON OF AN APPEAL FOR [222]-]5- MONARCH FOOD" - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to require the 30 addition of tiles to the dome element for Shakey's restaurant located in the Terra Vista Town Center - APN: 1077 - 421 -76. RESOLUTION NO, 92-2T6 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE APPEAL AND REVERSING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO REQUIRE CERAMIC TILE FOR THE DOME ELEMENT FOR SHAKEY'S RESTAURANT (DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 91 -15), LOCATED IN THE TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077- 421-76 RESOLUTION NO. 92-217 a0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO REQUIRE CERAMIC TILE FOR THE DOME ELEMENT FOR SHAKEY'S RESTAURANT (DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO, 91 -15), LOCATED IN THE TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077- 421-76 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following Items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGFR'S STAFF nccnaTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. No Items Submitted. PAGE City Council Agenda 0 July 15, 1992 6 t. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following Items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. No Items Submitted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to Identify the Items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These Items will not be discussed at this meeting, only Identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to Ilve minutes pe, individual. S. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO A JOINT MEETING WITH THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 22, 1992, 7:00 P.M. IN THE RAINS CONFERENCE 'OJM, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 10, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 3, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MIN UTRS Recular Meet ins A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, June 3, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucaaonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Diane Williams, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Jerry B. Pulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Game., Community Development Director; Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst; LeAnn Smothers, Redevelopment Analyst; Tarry Smith, Park Planning /Development Superintendent; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Steve Hayes, Associate Planner; Cindy Norris, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Jim Hatt, Administrative Service. Director; Tony Flores, Management Analyst I; Ingrid Blair, GIB Supervisor; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Seiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. BI. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff was requesting Item DS be continued to July 1, 1992- B2. Jack Lam, City Me:.ager, requested that Items D7 and US be considered under City Manager's Staff Reports. 1 f R f f f C COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. City Council Minutes June 3, 1992 Page 2 D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: May 6, 1992 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Noe. 5/13/92, 5/20/92 and 5/21/927 and Payroll ending 5/7/92 for the total amount of $1,838,810.51. D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off -Sale Beer & Wine for Smart & Final, Smart & Final Stores Corporation, 8675 Base Line Road. D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General for Smith •a Food & Drug Center /702, Smiths Food & Drug Centers, Incorporated, northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. D5. Approval of Appointments to the Bilingual, Senior and Sports Advisory Committees. ITEM CONTIMU® To JULY 1, 1992 n6. Approval of the incremental transfer of $66,149.00 from the 1990/91 phase of the multi -year Community Development Block Grant funded Southwest Cucamonga Street Improvement Project to various program year phases of this project. D7. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System in the amount of $297.48 per acre). ITEM CONSIDERED UNDER CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) De. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 88 -2 (Drainage and Law Enforcement). ITEM CONSIDERED UNDER CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) D9. Approval of Environmental Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map 13987 - Lewis Development Compan} - Approval of a resolution confirming the decision from the City Council hearing of May 20, 1992 to modify and approve the Conditions of Approval relating to Tentative Parcel Map 13987. City Council Minutes June 3, 1992 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING AND APPROVING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 13987 TO CREATE A 1.31 ACRE PARCEL IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 151 -17 DID. Approval to execute Memorandum of Understanding (CO 92 -038) between the San Bernardino Countywide Gangs 6 Drugs Task Force and its Fiscal Agent, San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D11. Approval to execute a Subordination Agreement from Shih -Chen Hsu for the property located at 10010 Almond Street (APN 1074 - 041 -06). RESOLUTION NO. 92 -170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM SHIH -CH$N HSU AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME (APN 1074 - 041 -06) D12. Approval of Hap, execution of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Noe. 1 and 2 for Tract No. 14644, located a the and of Camellia Court, north of Hillside Road, east of Beryl Street, submitted by Jorge R. Garcia, DBA Garcia 6 Associates. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT HAP NUMBER 14644, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 92 -172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT NO. 14644 013. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 5782 Haven Avenue, located on the west aide of Haven Avenue south of Hillside Road, submitted by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Sainte. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR 5782 HAVEN AVENUE City Council Minutes June 3, 1992 Page 4 014. Approval of Reduction and Substitution of Securities for Tract 13359, located on the Sant Bide of Sapphire Street between Orchard Street and Jennet Street, submitted by H.R. Heim Incorporated /Royal Conserve Corporate. Release: Contingent upon acceptance of Certificate of Deposit in the amount of $190,000.00 to be transferred to the City by Surety Company Faithful Performance Bond $166,200.00 Labor and Materials Bond $ 83,100.00 Accept: Reduced Faithful Performance Certificate of Deposit $106,900.00 Labor and Materials Certificate of Deposit $ 83,100.00 D15. Approval to accept Improvements and Notice of Completion for the Utility Undergrounding associated with Tract 12835, located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow Highway. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12835 - UNDERGROUNDING AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D16. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Honda and Notice of Completion for Tract 13304 - Base Line Road Improvements, located on the south side of Base Line Road between Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $326,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 32,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13304 - BASE LINE ROAD AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D17. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for CUP 90 - -40 located on the southwest corner of Jasper Street and Sierra Vista Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 32,000.00 City Council Minutes June 3, 1992 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 90 -40 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE D18. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for CUP 91 -11, located on the east aide of Lucas Ranch Road north of 4th Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 4,360.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -177 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 91 -11 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D19. Approval to set a Public Hearing for July 1, 1992 - Approval of Amended Parcel Map 11891, located generally at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, submitted by BODO Associated L.P., A California Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE AMENDED PARCEL HAP 11891 AI4D OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to approve the consent Calendar with the exception of Items D5, D7 and DS. Motion carried unanimouely, 5 -0. a._ CONSENT ORDINANCES E1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSHENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02 - JACK MAST Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 496. ORDINANCE NO. 496 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 92 -02, PARTS A 6 B ELIMINATING DESIGNATED ACCESS POINTS ALONG ROCHESTER AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE, AND ADDING AN `AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURT" USE CONSISTING OF AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES AS A City Council Minutes June 3, 1992 Page 6 CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN SUBAREA 7, AND - SPECIALTY BUILDING SUPPLIES AND NOME IMPROVEMENTS" AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE WITHIN SUBAREA 7, RESPECTIVELY - APN: 229 -011- 10, 19, 21, 26, 27 AND 28 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 496. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. fi R! 1 k R E2. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES TO DECLARE A DOG AS VICIOUS Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 498. ORDINANCE NO. 498 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 6.04 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS AND /OR VICIOUS DOGS MOTION: Moved by euquet, seconded by Wright to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 498. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. R . R R ♦ R E3. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION ORDINANCE Debra J. Adame, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 307 -B. ORDINANCE NO. 307 -B (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2.28 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION TO REFLECT THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE FIVE, TERMS OF TWO AND FOUR YEAR APPOINTMENTS, AND THE REMOVAL OF JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS WITH THE CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE MOTION: Moved by Bogner, seconded by Wright to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 498. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. . • . R R x E._ ADVERTISED PUBLIC aEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF ETIW NDA SPgfjFjg ELM AMENDMENT 89 -03 - U.S, HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Commiosion's decision recomosnding denial of a request to amend certain development standards within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. (Continued from April 1, 1992) City Council Minutes June 3; 1992 Page 7 NSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14211 - U.S. HOMES CORPORATION - An appeal of the Planning Commission'e decision denying the proposed tentative tract map and design review for the development of 226 single family lots on 81.2 acres of lard within the Etiwanda Specific Plan in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling unite per acre) , located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of the Devore Freeway, and west of East Avenue - APN: 1100 - 041 -09, 1100 - 081 -02, 1100- 171 -01 and 13, 1100 - 181 -01, 1100 - 141 -01 and 12, and 1100- 191 -01. Related File: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 89 -03. (Continued free April 1, 1992) Mayor Stout stated he is in receipt of a letter from the appellant requesting a continuance of 60 days with the Planning Commission and 90 days with the City Council. He asked if this will come back August 5, 1992, or was this an error. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated staff would agree to the 90 days. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated he would suggest the 90 day continuance. Jerry Smith, U.S. Homes, stated they are working with a new company for their plans and that is why the delay. He stated they would like the 90 day extension. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated this would be coming back at the council's September 2, 1992 meeting. Mayor Stout opened the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to continue Item F1 to September 2, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. w I • 4 ♦ R F2 FOR REPROGRAMMING OF FUNDS - The adoption of the Final Statement of Community Development Objectives for Program Year 1992/93 and the final selection of projects based on a grant of $551,000.00 and $13,260.00 in program income, and related amendments to the 1989/90 and 1990/91 Final Statements to allow reprogramming of funds. Staff report presented by Cindy Norris. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR PROGRAM YEAR 1992/93 City Council Minutes June 3, 1992 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92- 179. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to adopt staff's recommendation with respect to the reprogramming. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. x . . . . . Item F3 was heard after Item 12 due to the appellant not being present at this time, but the minutes will remain in agenda order. F3. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL OF MODIFICAT ON TO CONDITION E PE IT 91 0 JAMES PAGE - Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a request to expand the hours Of operation on Fridays for an existing 103,552 square foot indoor wholesales /retail commercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subare. .1) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - "Ni 229 - 262 -20. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the applicant cannot be present for this meeting, but asked that the Council continue the matter to another meeting. Rick Comer, Community Development Director, stated he spoke with a gentleman by the name of Darren and that :Ie asked for the Council to continue the matter to the next available meeting. Councilmember Buquet felt the City needed to communicate to these people that the City does not like what they are seeing with this project. Mayor Stout stated he would like to also discuss with them the whole concept of this mall, because he is not happy with what he is seeing there. Councilmember Wright stated she disagreed with Mayor Stout and felt some exceptions needed to be made for them because of the economy situation. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -180 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 91 -03, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION ON FRIDAYS, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND HARING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS 229- 262-28 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to continue the matter to June 17, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like a chronological sequence of events for the approval of this project and felt this needed to be discussed further. City Council Minutes June 3, 1992 Page 9 Councilmember Williams asked if there was a way to see if the stall holders are residents of the City. Councilmember Wright stated she knows there is one person who is a resident and that person felt there are more stall holders that are residente of Rancho Cucamonga. She felt there was sccething the City could do to help them be successful and still meet the City standards. No items submitted. f f R R R! O. PUBLIC BEARINGS R f f f R f B. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS FOR THE NOVEMBER 3 1992 ELECTION Staff report presented by Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO. 92-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 1992, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BEHELD ON SAID DATE RESOLUTION NO. 92 -182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDATE'S STATEMENT FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1992 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -183 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, THE THIRD (3RD) DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1992, SUBMITTING A QUESTION TO THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING WHETHER THE MAYOR SHALL SERVE A FOUR YEAR TERM City Council Minutes June 3, 1992 Page 10 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -184 (OPTIONAL) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE RESOLUTION NO. 92 -185 (OPTIONAL) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS RESOLUTION NO. 92 -186 (OPTIONAL) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE PILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Noe. 92 -181, 92 -182, 92 -183, 92 -184, 92-185, 92-186. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0, with the Council authorising Councilmember Williams to file a written argument regarding the measure with respect to Resolution No. 92 -184. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. G2. CONSIDERATION TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84 -1 IDAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN THE AMOUNT OF 5297.48 PER ACRE1 Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, public comments were closed. RESOLUTION NO, 92 -167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Williams to approve Revolution No. 92 -167. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. G3. CONSIDERATION TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAY FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -.2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENTI Staff report presented by Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director. City council Minutes .June 3, 1992 Page 11 Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, public comments were closed. Councilmember Wright stated she still does not agree with the Law Enforcement Assessment District even with the $1.00 amount. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88 -2 (DRAINAGE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT) MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 92- 168. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. R ♦ R R R I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. DISCUSSION OF LIBRARY MASTER PLAN (Continued from May 6, 1992) Staff report presented by Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I. Councilmember Buquet stated he appreciated the fact that the County responded, but did not feel comfortable with the information provided. He felt the City should ask for verification by audit on how the numbers were compiled. He felt the County was in error. Councilmember Wright stared she agreed, but felt the City should go forward with exploring options for a City controlled library. Mayor Stout stated he favored Option 1 first, and then Option 3. The Council continued with the discussion on how to proceed with this matter. Councilmember Wright felt the County needed to provide the service. that Rancho Cucamonga deserved, and that the City should take a stand on this. She felt the service at the library was deplorable. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like to see the City operate its own library. He felt the city should figure out what level of service it wanted to provide and then go from there with the coat involved and the size of the facility, etc. Councilmember Williams felt it would not be easy to keep the money that the City gives to the County for library services. City Council Minutes June 3, 1992 Page 12 Mayor Stout felt the City could provide better service than the County and for lees money even if the building is smaller. He stated what he hears the Council saying is that they want their own library and to be able to provide a level of service that is better than what we already have at the present time. He stated he felt negotiations should start with the County that would put the City in an improved position over what it is now. He stated if the negotiations are in the City's favor to operate its own library, then the City should pursue thin. He stated our City won't know what the County will dG until we start negotiating with them. Councilmember Williams stated she just heard that the Rancho Cucamonga Librarian, Tony Chavez, was transferred to Chino Hills. She felt he was doing a good job. Councilmember Buquat felt the Subcommittee should work with staff and meet with the County to talk about this situation. He felt legal counsel needed to check out what the City can and cannot do. ACTION: Proceed with negotiations with the County and also request an audit from them on how our money in being spent. Councilmember Alexander stated that some time ago an interview process took place for a member of the Historic Preservation Commission, and that now one of those members has had to resign. He stated one of the applicants at that time was Anne Tessier, and felt she would be a good person to fill the vacancy. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to appoint Anne Tessier to the Historic Preservation Commission. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. R R/ R R R No items were identified for the next meeting. R R R♦ R R R. COMMUNICATIONS IRON TO PUBLIC R1. Valerie Karec, 364 W. Gayle St., Ontario, stated she wanted to talk about the North Etiwanda area and was concerned about the preservation of this area as it relates to animals and plants. • • a R R City Council Minutes June 3, 1997 Page 13 MOTION: Moved by august, seconded by Williams to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss personnel matters, property negotiations and pending litigation with Woods v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, and Bedrosian v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, and for the Executive Session to adjourn to a budget meeting to be held June 4, 1992, 5:00 p.m, in the Tri- Communities Conference Room. Motion carried unanimously, 5- 0. The meeting adjourned at 8:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: June 4, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES Bdu t-w—Q ITUR An adjourned budget workshop of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council was held on Thursday, June 4, 1992, in the Tri- Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet 11 (arrived 6:05 p.m.), Diane Williams, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stool- Also present were: Jack Larn, City Manager: Jerry B. Fulwood. Deputy City Manager. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer: Shimu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Wall Stickney, Associate Engineer; Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer; Jerry Grant. Building Offnlal; Jim Ilan, Administrative Services Director: Susan Neely, Finance Officer, Rose Colum, Accountant; Tony Flares, Management Analyst 1: Jim Frost, City Treasumr. Ingrid Blair, GIS Supervisor; Mani Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Manager: Chief Dennis Michael, Chief Lloyd Almand, and Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zenner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Deparrmene and Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk. Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager, who stated this was a difficult year for the budget, and a lot of time and effort was put into producing the budget by the various department heads and the Administrative Services Department. He stated there were severe revenue drops last year, acid revenue has continued to drop in the current year. He stated the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 1992/,3 reflects the current poor econnmv. He stated the proposed General Fund budget was approximately $26 million. which represents a Sl million from Occurrent year's budget, and a S3.3 decrease less than Fiscal Year 1990/91. He went on to explain the format of the budget documents. He stated the RDA budget from an operational standpoint was $3.3 million, that the approximately $80 rndlion shown were the carry -over bond funds from designated projects. He-stated the Fire District General Fund is approximately .$6.5 million, and the Mcfo -Roos portion was $2.3 million. He stated the Fire District was also experiencing some difficulty this year, though it was better off than the City's budget. He explained the shortfall in the Mcllo -Roos portion, and the procedure for adopting the Fire District budget. He stated that the Capital Improvement showed all the planned projects for the next fiscal year which included three major prnlects, the City Council/Redevelopment Agency/ Fire District Minutes Jane a, 1992 Page 2 widening of 191h Street, the I -15 and Foothill Boulevard interchange, and the Haven Avenue widening project. He stated these projects were to be funded from gas tax and Measure I funds so they would nor loose those revenues. He stated the CIP represented approximately $15.9 million, and only represented certain infrastructure improvements and does not reflect any public facility construction as they have had in prior years, as there were no funds available for those types of projects. He passed out a legislative alert from the L.eaguc of California Cities about measures that could be proposed to the .state legislature to balance their budget, and went aver how these proposal would affect the City. Councilmember Wright asked if they would have the opportunity to review the Fire District budget in depth between now and August Jack [.am, City Manager, stated they would spend as much time as necessary to answer all the questions, Councilmember Wright asked about the integrated waste management program, and asked if them was a revenue somcc for that program. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated AB 939 has a specific fee attached to it as part of the trash rates, and that pays for the Integrated Waste Coordinator position and the associated programs. Councilmember Wright referred to page 12 of the Council budget and asked about the D,A.R.E. and CHOICES programs reimbursements. She asked why the City was not continuing to fund the CHOICES program but were increasing the amount to the D.A.R.E. program. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the figures shown on page 12 were revenue received, and the amount shown for D.A.R.E. were the contributions from the school districts participating in the program. Councilmember Wright stated there was another page in the budget that showed expenditures and she did not sce an allocation for the CHOICES program. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the D.A,R.E, program received reimbursement bands from the school districts and am self sustaining. Councilmember Wright asked what portion of the General Fund went to the D.A.R.E, program. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated the City's portion was approximately $60,000.00. He stated that was mostly to cover the costs associated with the deputy that conducted the program. Councilmember Wright asked what was the reason for cutting the CHOICES program to zero in this budget. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated it was his understanding that the participating school districts would be paying a set amount to have that program. He stated they were looking at an agreement with the Sheriff's Department to have the revenues transferred to the County and have the program handled directly through them. Councilmember Wright asked what was the City's contribution then and where did it appear in the budget. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated there might not be an expenditure from the City since the Sheriff's Department would be running the program. City Council/Red.velopmemAgencyl Fire District Minutes June u, 1992 Page 3 Jack Lam, City Manager, explained how the school district had asked to have the program enhanced but it was beyond the City's ability, and since the County was looidng at promoting the CHOICES program, the City asked the County to train the personnel so the school districts could contract directly with the County. Councdnember Wright felt the point then was that the City was not making any contribution for gang diversion, that their contributions were going north of Arrow in those schools that were being served by the D.A.R.E. program. She felt this went against Council's pact commitment to support gang diversion. She felt if the Council was committed to gang diversion, then they need to show that in their priorities and that irregardless of what the school district is doing, the City should also continue to fund gang prevention. Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, explained that to prior years the City had a deputy on staff who were providing the CHOICES program, and the City paid for the deputy's time as part of the contract with the Sheriff's Department. When the County moved the CHOICES program over to the Sheriff's Department, there was pro longer a deputy in -house providing the service, so in essence the City was not making the expenditure they had in the past by paying for the deputy's salary and cost. He stated the City was still committed to the CHOICES program, but that it was being handled directly by the Sheriffs Department County -wide. He stated the City never made a monetary contribution directly to the CHOICES program, they just paid the salary of the deputy conducting the program as pan of the law enforcement contract - Councilmember Wright felt the Council had said since they were spending money north of Arrow on the D.A.R.E. program, they would also provide the same kind of contribution to the people south of Arrow even though their needs were different, and felt they were not holding to that policy now. Mayor Stout stated it was his understanding that the CHOICES program was continuing at the same level as in the past, that it has not been cut or reduced. He asked if that was copper. Capt. Zeiner. Police Department, stated the level of service has actually increased since the transfer to the Sheriffs Department. Councilmember Wright stated she was concerned that since someone else was in charge of the program, what would the City do if that agency could net afford to continue the program. Mayor Stout fell they should address that whenever the County might stay they are not going to pay for the program. He stated if they were willing to pay for the program, and were increasing the service levels above what the City could provide, why should the City expend funds on the program. Councilmember Wright stated the school district was paying for the program and not the County, and they were only doing so because the City did not pay for the program any longer. Councilmember Buquet disagreed with Councilmember Wright. He stated it was not the City's job to provide programs for the schools. He stated the City's involvement was to assist the schools in getting the program up and running, and the long term intent was to find some way for the program to be financially self susuining, He stated the City has loaned an officer into the program for all that time, and now the County has taken over and expanded the program. He asked what benefit would the City derive by contributing money to a program that the County was already providing. Councilmember Wright felt if the City were to conui hum to CHOICES, it would make it effective and serve mom people in Rancho Cucamonga. City Council/Redevelopment Agency; Fire District Minutes June 4, 1992 Page 4 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he had met with Cucamonga School District representatives several months ago, and they agreed to contract dieted; with the County for the CHOICES program because of problems the City would have in expanding the program. Councilmember Wright felt the existing program barely musts the needs of the community in regards to the gang problem which the City should be addressing, and that they were leaving it up to someone else in address, and that was what she was having a problem with. Mayor Stout stated he was uncomfortable in discussing this because he felt if the school district should have approached the Council if they felt the funding was inadequate, and they have not dons so. Councilmember Wright stated the school district contacted the City Manager and were told the City had no money for the program which was why they heeded to consider it now at budget time. Mayor Stout stated if the school board disagreed with that they should have contacted the Council about it, and they have not done so. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated they did not tell the school district they did not have any money, but that it would be a difficult policy decision for the City to spend money outside of the City limits but they were free to ask the Council that. At the same time they were discussing expansion of their program, and since the Cowry was going to be expanding into other areas with the program, it was suggested the school district contact the Sheriffs Department about it. The City has not heard anything back from either the schwl district or the Sheriff's Department in regards to the CHOICES program. Councilmember Wright felt them were other needs in the City in addressing gang prevention other than working with students, and the Council should consider contributing in order to help solve the problem to a higher degree. Councilmember Buquet stated he had a concern in that Councilmember Wright appeared to have access to information from the school district regarding the CHOICES program that was not available to the whole Council, and felt uncomfortable in it being bmught to the Council's attention in this manner. He stated the Superintendent contacted staff about the matter and it was handled on an administrative level. He stated the School Board has not contacted the Council in any manner about this program, and felt it was inappropriate for it to be brought to the Council in this way. Counuilmemher Wright stated it was not her intention to serve anyone outside of the City, but felt they should be looking at the CHOICES program, and felt that when they were setting priorities they should make sum they were addressing all of the needs of the City, and that gang diversion was being requested by other parts of the City, not just south of Arrow. Councilmember Alexander asked for clarification on whether D.A.R.E. touched on the subject of gang prevention. Capt. Zeineq Police Department, stated only a small portion of the program centered on gang prevention. Mayor Stout felt that drugs affected more kids in the City than gangs and if they were trying to help all the kids in town, he felt drags would touch them mom than gang activity so D.A.R.E. was an important program. He fell that if the County was providing the CHOICES program at the same or better level than the City had, he had no problem with the School District contracting directly with the County. City Council/RedevelopmeruAgercy/ Fire District Minutes Jun, 4, 1942 Page 5 Councilmember Williams stated from her participation with the Gang & Drug Prevention Task Force, they have covered that them are two types of gang interpretation, one being the real gangs, and the other being the "tiara bes ". She stated the CHOICES program was supposed to be for at -risk individuals, and did not feel that the majority of kids in the City fell within that category. She also wondered why the School District did not approach the Council if there were some problem in continuing to fund the CHOICES program. Councilmember Wright asked if there was a reason for the cost of the 800 MHz system increasing from 5200,000.00 to $2', 5,000.00. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the City's commitment has been in the West End system, which pays for the maintenance and operation on the IPA, and also on the capital in supporting the bond money. He stated that was the commitment they must keep in order to be a part of the JPA. Councilmember Wright staled she thought they were going to eliminate the dues to me Local Government Commission and the Contact Cities membership. lack f.am, City Manager, stated staff has not received direction from the Council on that Councilmember Williams stated she has derived benefit from the Local Crovemment Commission, but does not know what the benefit is fmm the Contract Cities Association. Maya Stout agreed Councilmember Briquet felt that before they eliminate the membership, which was a minimal cost, they should evaluate what the benefit of the organization might be, especially if they had to join in some type of joint lawsuit in response to the snare's budget decisions. Jack I,=. City Manager, also pointed our that Animal Control services were included in the budget in order to gear up for the opening of the facilities in July of 1993. He stated them were also funds in the budget for the federal stonnwater issue, which they can expect to increase in the future due to the program requirements. Mayor Stout stated if anyone on the Council had any detailed questions, they should get with the City Manager and he would be happy to answer them. He felt the City was being fiscally responsible. Cl. Don Donnelly, Government Relations Committee of the Chamber of Commerce, stated the Chamber would be happy to work with the City on budget issues being presented by the state, He stated the City has been fiscally responsible in the past, City Council/Redevelopment Agency/ Firn District Minutes June 4, 1992 Page 6 MO77ON: Moved by Wright. seconded by Alexander to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clerk Approved: June 17, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held oa Wednesday, June 17, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called in order at 7:11 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Smut. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles 1. Buquet 11, Diane Williams (arrived 8:15 p.m.), Pamela J. Wright, and Maya Dennis L. Stow Also present were: lack lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst; Ono Kroudl, Deputy City Planner; Dan Coleman, Principal Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shinto Bose, Deputy City Engimer, Bob Zelterberg, Public Works Maintenance Manager, Barrye Hanson, Sr, Civil Engineer; Walt Stickney, Associate Planner; Cindy Hackett, Associate Engineer; Jerry Grant, Building Official; Jim Hatt, Administrative Services Director; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst 11: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst 1; Capt. Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lt- Mike Ingram, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. BE Jack Lam, City Manager, announced that item DI I was to accept the Landscape ImprovemeilLs only for Tenet 13566 -1, then the Notice of Completion was na m be approved at this time; therefore, Resolution No. 92 -191 was net no". B3. lack Lam, City Manager, also announced that item Hl was to be removed from this agenda and would come back at a future meeting. No communication was made from the public. ♦r•r +r D. CONSKNT CAT .RNDAR DI. .Approval of Minutes: May 20, 1992 (WiMams absent) May 27. 1992 (Sequel went) City Council Minutes Suns 17, 1992 Page 2 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 527/92, 6/3192, and 6/10,92; and Payroll ending 521/92 for the total amount of $1,170.392.62. D3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 1992. D4. Approval in authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation and Widening, from Fourth Street to Footbill Boulevard," to be funded from Systems Fund, Account No. 22- 4637 -8936 and Federal Aid Urban (TAU) Fund, Account No. 244637 -8838. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING, FROM FOURTH STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to continue with representation by County Counsel in the L.A. Cellular, etc., v. State Board of Equalization, etc., ec at San Francisco Superior Court No. 94 21 31 matter. D6. Approval of Sobriety Cheek Point Toiler and Materials. D7. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 92 -039) for 1992 Tree Planting Program, to Trautwein Construction, for the amount of 548,723.00 ($44,293.48 plus 10% contingency), in be funded from SBA Tree Grant, Account No. 1244637-6028. D8. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement for Installation of a potion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility in connection with development of Tract No. 10210, located across the southeasterly project area connecting to the existing Almond Interceptor Channel, submitted by First Hotel Inwstment Corporation, RESOLUTION NO. 92 -188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO, 10210 D9. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement for Installation of a Portion of a Master Planned Storm Drain Facility in connection with development of Tract No. 13644, located in Vista Grove Street from the westerly side of Hermosa Avenue in the easterly property boundary, submitted by Reign Construction Company, Incorporated for Wcxmdridge Esmtcs, Lid. RESOLUTION NO. 912-189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSFMENT AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF A PORTION OF A MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN FACILITY IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT NO. 13644 City Council Minutes June 17, 1992 Page 3 DIO. Approval to execute an Agreemem for the installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights -of- Way at the southwest comer of V inmar Avenue and Ninth Street between Calisdo Gomez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga RESOLUTION NO. 92 -190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION FROM CALISTIO GOMEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME DI 1. Approval to accept Landscape Improvements Only for Tract 13566 -I. Ideated on the south side of Summit Avenue between Wardman Bullock Road and San Sevame Avenue, MOTION: Moved by Wnght, seconded by Buquet to approve the Consent Calendar including the modification to Item DI I as stated by Jack lam. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0.1 (William absent). No items submitted. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES rrrrr• F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Fl. CONSIDERATION TO ADOCI BY B2EFERENCE THE 1991 UNIFORMM CUDES Staff report presented by Jerry Grant, Building Official, Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public heanng. There being no response, the public healing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No, 497. ORDINANCE NO. 497 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.08, 15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.28, 15.32, 15.36, 15.40, AND 15.44 OF TITLE 15, BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE "UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ", 1991 EDITIONI "THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE', 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING City Council Minutes June 17, 1992 Page 4 ALL APPENDICES THERETO; THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS ", 1991 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE ", 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES; THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE ", 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL .APPENDICES; THE "UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS ", 1991 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE ", 1991 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM BUILDING SECURITY CODE', 1991 EDITION; AND THE "UNIFORM SIGN CODE ", 1991 EDITION; WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO SAID CODES, INCLUDING PENALTIES MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to waive full reading and set second reading for July 1, 1992. Motion carried unanimously, 441 (Williams absent). F2. Engineer. Staff report presented by Barryc Hanson, Sr. Civil Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Mr. Pauw, attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. Vemola, owners of the Magic Lamp Restaurant, stored the owners are in agreement with the recommendation presented by staff. Charles Althouse, auomey representing the Cuccia family, owners of Vince's Spaghetti, stated his clients agree that having the access is extremely important. He stated that as long as they can still park vehicles next to their facility they would have no objection to the proposal with the 26 fnol easement that would ran north and south. Councilmember Buquel felt what Mr. Althouse was relating was different than that repotted by staff and the Magic Lamp s auomey, He stated if that area is to be an easement, them would need to be unobstructed ingress and egta ; for vehicles, including emergency apparatus in get through them. He stated what he is hearing Mr. Althouse say is that the Cuccia family would like m use this area for parking. Mr. Althouse stated that would only include the area that is immediately neat to their property, and to have this taken away would be very difficult for them. Councilmember Buquet felt what Mr. Althouse was saying was different than staffs recommendation Councilmember Wright stated she felt the report presented was incomplete unless the issue about parking in the casement arcs was more clearly dented. Mayor Stoat asked if the issues of the casement have been sealed and did it stale exactly what the easement was for. Baeryc Hanson, Sr. Civil Engineer, sited the casement doesn't say this, but that is implied. He stated 26 feet unobstructed is generally what the frc department needs to get their apparatus through an area, and stated it is assumed that there will not be parking in this area. Fie stated a truck unloading, or something along that line, would be permissible occasionally, City Council Minutes June 17, 1992 Page 5 Councilmember Wright stated what sbe is hearing is that Vince's employees would root ba allowed to park in the casement area. Barrye Hanson, Sr. Civil Engineer, stated that was a conflict. James Markman, City Attorney, pointed out that there are conflicts in the public alley at the present time. He stated the whole point is that they are receiving a private right for access that is equivalent to what the public right is now, and that there. was rw reason for the alley to exist as an alleyway that people can drive through. He stated an obstruction of a public alleyway where fire apparatus couldn't reach a fire causes him more concern than an obstruction of a private easement. He stated this was the whole reason staff supports this request. Councilmember Buquet stated it is clear to him that there is lack of parking on one of the pieces of property and spilling over onto another property, which would hopefully be resolved. He felt once this was private property, they could conceivably put up a six or eight foot wall across there and then restrict it to a 26 foot width. He stated then if employees' vehicles are parked there, the problem would be compounded even more. He felt this needed to be resolved. James Markman, City Auomey, stated a controlled easement, walls, fences and barriers are specifically precluded. He stated the only argument he hears is if delivery is allowed in the easement and can someone park and obstruct the alley, which he felt was the issue, Councilmember Buquet asked if it would be possible for tine property owner of interest on the left side in put a wall upon the left side, which he felt would be a problem. He felt he needed some of these issues to get resolved. Barrye Hanson, Sr. Civil Engineer, stated he has indicated he would build a wall. Councilmcmber Alexander felt this can cull be resolved to make both parties happy. He asked how many employee vehicles would be parked there. Mr. Althouse stated approximately ten vehicles would be parked there, which was an average. He also mentioned there was information that the Fire Department, in the event of any problems in this area, would park on San Bernardino Road or Foothill Boulevard and tan their hoses m the emergency. Councilmember Wright felt staff should get with the parties involved to work out the problems and come back to the Council for approval. Mr. Pauw stated the Vemola's did not feel it would be fair to give six feet of their property and then it be used for parking. He stated the Verrwla's felt the property should be vacated. Mayor Stout sorted he agreed there were more problems with this issue than was presented in the mpon, He agreed there was a signiricant parking problem in this area. He felt them was a fire safety problem as far as getting equipment in the area, and felt this issue needed to be studied. He felt the Council should eventually make the decision on this mater. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE. VACATED AN EXISTING ALLEY EXTENDING FROM RED HILL COUNTY CLUB DRIVE TO SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (LOCATED SOUTH OF AND GENERALLY PARALLEL TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD) City Council Minutes June 17, 1992 Page 6 MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Alexander to mfcr this back to staff so that the Fire Department can look at it, the Planning Department look at it with respect to parking requirements and so forth, and asked that the Public Safety Commission look at this with a report coming hack to the Council covering all aspects. Motion carried 3 -1. 1 (Wright no, Williams absent). ... rs• ITEMS F3, F4, AND F5 WERE CONSIDERED AT THE SAME TIME. onawlauff.10i Pro *,1911111 wevaLsoul kL YEAR 1992UD Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, who also to the various Assessment Districts. He mentioned Warren Diven was also present to answer Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Al Plummer of Term Vista, LMD4, felt there was a certain arcs in his District that was not getting the attention that other areas were getting and felt this should be looked at. He added he was not opposing the increase in the assessment. He stated them wereapproximately 120 (maximum) houses involved. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the City is aware of this problem and is working on correcting it. Rex Gutierrez in Victoria community, Chair of ACTIVE, stated that the members of the ACTIVE group opposed the increase until they had more time to study the material that the City Council had already received. He stated he did not think the residents should have to pay for the state's problems, that the amount of 540.00 does make a difference. He felt the residents should have more time to review the information before a decision is made. George Ruben, Victoria tract, stated last year they paid more taxes than they had preiviously and could not sce justification for an increase. He felt the residents should have a say in how the Assessment District is operated. He stated he was opposed to any increase and also felt the people that maintain the trees did not do a good job. He felt the people should have a say in the decision making. Tracy Brown, 8248 Amethyst, stated she had wriuen a letter previously and had not received a reply yet. She stated her concems dealt with public safety. She stated that on Malachite and Devon then: is a two -way stop which needs to be a four -way stop sign. She stated on Foothill, north of Malachite by the AM -PM mina-market, was dangerous. She felt them needed to be landscaping in the median. Councilmember Wright stared it was her understanding this was pan of the master plan for this area. James Schaue, Victoria, talked about the increases in assessments and that he did not agree with them. He felt there were still problems with the landscaping itself as far ac it being maintained properly, He asked that the City Council reconsider any increases before approving them. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmcmber Duque( asked when the Engineer's report was available. Jim O'Neil, City Engineer, stated May 6th. City Council Minutes June 17, 1992 Page 7 Councilmember Buquet mentioned the various ways that this information is available to the public regarding this saner. Councilmember Buquet asked Joe O'Neil to explain the maintenance levels that are involved in the Landscape Maintenance Districts, Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, continued to explain this and stated that the Victoria area is maintained at level D, which is a low level of maintenance, and continued to give more details regarding this. He also mentioned an $89,000.00 grant the City received from the federal government in order to improve the districts. Councilmember Buquet asked for a breakdown for the increased assessment co Joe O'Neil. City Engineer, mentioned inflation, increases in utilities, and the delinquency of assessments to be paid to the City. COuncibnembCr Williams arrived at 8:15 p.m. COimellmember Buquet asked where the delinquency money would go Once it was paid Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the money would go back into Use Assessment District it was originally charged from. He continued m mention that the City only gets one shot at raising assessments per year before it has m go on the lax rolls. He also stated there am m:_' delinquencies in the assessments this year than there has been in previous years. Councilmember Alexander mentioned the budget hearings fa people to come to in order to find out about the City's fmances. He added some Of the increase is due to increases in utility charges that the City has to pay. He felt the report was a good rrp x Councilmember Buquet felt that staff should investigate the utility companies charging the increases in assessments directly to the residents instead of it being passed down to the City, who will have to charge the residents, which makes the City look like the "bad guy'. Councilmember Williams stated she cannot be involved in the decision making process because of not hearing the public testimony due to arriving late. Councilmember Wright stated she would be voting m because she fell tax increases should be approved by a vote of the people. Mayor Stout stated the cowardly way around this is for areas to form homeowner's associations to Like care of the landscaped areas. Mayor Stout stated Victoria wanted to have less density and because of this there am less people to pay for the assessments. He commented that the City does not Imave money in the General Fund in pay for the increases. He also mentioned that the William Lyon Company used to pay for pan of the assessment, but now they do not. He added he felt City staff has done an excellentjob in their wow City Council Minutes June 17, 1992 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 92-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 85 -PD (HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS) MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquot to approve Resolution No. 92 -193. Motion carried 3 -1-0.1 (Wright no, Williams abstain). rrrrrr F4. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE ANNUAL FNGMER'S REPORTS AND RESOLD' QN FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS, 1 3A 3B. 4. 5.6.7 AND R FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, who also presented slides pertaining to the various Assessment Districts, He mentioned Warren Diven was also present to answer any questions. See item F3 for public hearing and discussion. I.��7117y11CiP.�`.C9LYIIL'J• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1. 2,3A, 38, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992193 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONVECTION WITH LANDSCAPE. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS, I, 2,3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6. 7 AND 8 MOTION: Moved by Alexander. seconded by Buquer to approve Resolution No. 92 -194, Motion carried 3 -IA -1 (Wright no, Williams abstain). rrarrr F5. L4- 16 7 AND 8 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992J9 Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, who also presented ,slides pertaining to the various Assessment Disuicts. He mentioned Warren Diven was also present to answer any questioo. Sec item F3 for public hearing and discussion. RESOLUTION NO. 92-195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 City Council Minutes June 17, 1992 Pag„ 9 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, swonded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 92 -195. Motion carried 3 -1-0-1 (Wright no, Williams abstain). « «r «rr F6. CONSIDERATION OF AP EAL OF MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91 -03 - JAME_S PAGE - Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a request to expand the hours of operation on Fridays for an existing 103,552 square four indoor wholesale/rewil commercial use located within the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan at 11530 Sixth Street - APN: 229- 262 -20. (Continued from June 3, 1992) Staff report presented by Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed, Mayor Stout asked if the applicant had been notified after this item was continued at the last meeting. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated yes. Mayor Stout stated this had been continued previously in order to allow the applicant to be present. He asked the Council if they would like to proceed. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -180 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENYING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 91 -03, PART C, FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE HOURS OF OPERATION ON FRIDAYS, LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - ARM 229 - 262 -28 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, secondee by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92 -180. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. r.r«rr G1. CONSIDERATIGN OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9 24.220 REOUIRING CONTINUING EDUCATION TO RENEW MASSAGE TECHNICIAN PERMITS Staff report presented by Duane Raker, Assistant to the City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Them being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams. City Clerk, read the tide of Ordinance No. 485 -A. ORDINANCE NO. 485 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 9.24.220 OF CHAPTER 9.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO RENEWAL OF MASSAGE TECHNICIAN LICENSES City Council Minutes June 17, 1992 Page 10 MOTION: Moved by BuqueL seconded by Alexander in waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 485 -A for the July I, 1992 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 5 -0. Hl. REPORT ON ORAL HISTORY PROJECT (Oral Report) ACTION: Item removed from agenda. H2, CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION REOUESTING THE STATAT_LF.-OSIAT IRE REJECT PROPOSALS TOREDUCE MLtx?1CIPAL _ FUNDINQ Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager who also read Resolution No. 92 -196 to stress its importance. He also commented on how Rancho Cucamonga is a uo- and low - property tax city and the affects that has on us. Council member Buquct also commented on how the State, takes away from local govemmenL RESOLUTION NO. 92 -196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING ON THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO REJECT PROPOSALS TO REDUCE LEVELS OF FUNDING FOR MUNICIPALITIES BF.LOW CURRENT LEVELS MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquct to approve Resolution No. 92 -196. Motion carried unanimously, 5.0. No items submitted. rr +rr• if. Councilmember Alexander asked that alternatives in lieu of raising assessments Se discussed at the next mceting, and asked Councilmember Wright if she would share her thoughts on this. Councilmember Wright stated she fell the City Council was opposed to this and did not feel it necessary to discuss this She mentioned she felt people should be able to vote on the level of service they want. Joyce Seenf asked Councilmemher Buquct to prepare the report on this matter instead of Councilmember Wright. Councilmember Buquct stated he did not have any alternative% to bring to the Council and that was why he was asking Councdmcmber Wright for her thoughts. City Council Minutes June 17, 1992 Page I1 Councilmember Alexander stated he had head Councilmember Wright mention alternatives and that was why he brought it up. Councilmember Wright stated her alternative is to allow people the opportunity to x'ete on my assessment increase. The Council concurred to place this on the next available agenda James Markman, City Attorney, asked for this matter to come back at the July 15 meeting instead of August I so he could be present. Councilmember Wright stated she would not be able N attend the July 15 meeting and asked that it come back on August 1. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he would work with Ice O'Neil on some options available for Nis. Councilmemoer Buquet asked for the water ram option he mentioned earlier to also be included. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC KI. Ray Sturman, Victoria, fell assessments were not equal and that contracts for maintaining the landscaping are too high. He felt the City should go back to the contractor and get the contract lowered. K2. Phil Deatherage, 6564 Etiwarda, agreed with Mr. Sturman and felt you should charge various assessments according to the property assessmCrit. James Markman, City Attorney, stated it is not legal to do this •Ire #r L. ADJO11RNMPNT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adjourn N Executive Session to discuss pmperty acquisition and personnel matters, and for Executive Session to adjourn ins budget workshop to be held on June 18, 1992,6:00 p.m, in the Tri- Communiues Confemnce Room. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. The mwung adjourned at 9:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: June 16, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES Budget worksho. A. CALL TO ORDER An adjourned budget workshop of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency, and Fire Protection District was held on Thursday, June 18, 1992, In the Tri -Cw unities Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:12 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Yamada J. Wright (arrived 6:14 p.m.), and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Ale. present were: Jack Lem, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Otto Rroutil, Deputy City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shinto Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Jerry Grant, Building Official) Marti Higgins, Disaster Prepyrednesa Manager; Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Officer; Rose Colum, Accountant; Tony Florea, Management Analyst I; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; chief Dennis Michael, Lloyd Almand, Deputy Chief Fire Marshal, Bob Corcoran, Deputy Chief, and Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection. District; Capt. Bruce Feiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was Councilmember: Diane Williams B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION el. DIUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 Mayor Stout stated this is an adjourned meeting of the City Council, Redevelopment Agency, and the Fire Protection District to discuss the proposed 1992/93 Fiscal Year budget. Mayor Stout continued to state that he, Councilmember Williams and City Manager Jack Lam had gone to Sacramento last week to meet with Senators Leonard and Ayala and Assemblyman Brulte regarding the State's budget crisis, and how any cute in revenues that may be placed on Rancho Cucamonga would negatively impact our City. He stated these cute would cost the City Council /Redevelopment Agency/ Fire Protection District Minutes June 18, 1992 Pa e 2 residents in services provided by the City including public safety. Mayor Stout stated he told our legislators all of the sacrifice. the City has already made to its budget in order to balance it. He added any additional cute by the state would mean a crisis situation for Rancho Cucamonga. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated at the last budget meeting, an overview was presented. He mentioned he did not want to hold off on adopting Rancho Cucamcnga'e budget while waiting to see what impacts the state's situation might have on us. He said if there are any changes to be made to our budget after the state decides what they will do, then we can go back and adjust our budget. Jack Lam, City Manager, pointed out that a memo had been distributed regarding the CHOICES issue that was raised at the last budget meeting. He continued to comment on the various associations the City belongs to, stating it is up to the Council whether or not to remain a member as he was proposing. Councilmember Wright questioned the Resources Services budget regarding personnel. Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director, stated there is a typo in the budget and that there was no reduction in Resources Service. staff. Councilmember Wright commented on the proactive patrol matter, and felt there needed to be further discussion regarding this issue. Councilmember Buquet felt the Bicycle Program would add a whole new avenue to proactive patrol. He also felt the motorcycles assisted in this area. Councilmember Williams questioned whether the City would be charging residents for labor to research information. Jack Lam, city Manager, explained nothing had ever been decided by the Council on this subject, but that it would be coming back to the Council sometime in July to update the Fee Resolution, and that this could be addressed at that time. Councilmember Alexander mentioned the time staff members devote to working with the City Commissions, and asked if there was anything in the budget regarding this. Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director, stated there in lnformatlon forthcoming regarding this matter, that it is in the final stages at the present time, Councilmember Alexander stated he did not think the city would know exactly where they were going for some time. City Council /Redevelopment Agency/ Fire Protection District Minutes June 18, 1992 Page 3 C. COMMUNICATION FROM TR6 PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. E yr MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Wright to adjourn to Executive Session regarding personnel matters, and for Executive Session to adjourn to Tuesday, June 30, 1992, 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers regarding budget matters. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 6:58 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Debra J. Adams, CNC City Clerk Approved: June 30, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adioumed Meeting An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Tuesday. June 30, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:02 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L, Stout Present were Councilmember: William 1. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet 11, Diane Williams, Pamela 1. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Jerry Grant, Building Official; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Anthea Hartig, Associate Planner; Mart; Higgins, Disaster Preparedness Manager; Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Officer: Bruce Zeiner, Captain Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; L. Dennis Michael, Chief Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lloyd Almand, Deputy Chief Fire Marshall; Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Officer: Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst I; and Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk. Councilmember Buquet requested that the City Council recess to executive session to discuss personnel matters. The Council recessed at 6:03 p.m. and reconvened at 6:51 p.m. 1. Approval to amend fiscal year 1991/92 appropriations. 2. Approval to amend salary Resolution No. 91 -174. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 91 -174 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 City Council Minutes June 30, 1992 Page 2 3. Approval of annual loan transaction between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. I. APPROVAL TO ADOPT FISCAL YEAR 1992193 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIIIB. Staif report by Jack Lain, City Manager. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO, 92-198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 BUDGET RESOLUTION NO, 92 -199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Resoidtion Nos. 92 -198 and 92 -199. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. D. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. E. ADJOIIRNMFNT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Wright to adjourr. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: ' July 1, 1992 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, July 1, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called m order at 7:24 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Resent were Councilmembers: William 1. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet 11, Diane Williams, Pamela J. Wright, and Chairman Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack lam, City Manager, Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Gunner, Community Development Director; Olen Jones, Sr. RDA Analyst; Jan Reynolds, Assistant RDA Analyst; Brad Buller, City Plammr; Joe O'Neil, City Enginer; Bamye Hansen, Sr. Civil Engineer; Jerry Grant, Building Official; Paula Portion, Management Analyst 11; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst 11; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANN011Nf;EMFNTeroEtESRN AT B1. Presentation Of Proclamation to Bryce Griffith, Brandon Griffith, Drake Smith, and Jared Wright for their clTorls in the aftermath of the Los Angeles riots. Mayor Stout presented the proclamations to Bryce and Brandon Griffith and a representative for Jared Wright (Drake. Smith was not present). B2, Presentation of Pnxlamations to National Merit Scholars Anna Hackvitx, Comic Gatlin and Kristin Rowe, Mayor Smut presented the proclamations to Anna HaskeiU and Kristin Rowe (Comic Gatlin was not present). B3. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the Month of July as Recreation and Parks Month. Mayor Stout pmsemed the Proclamation to Mark Whitehead, Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission. Mark Wh6chcad also presented too shirts to the City Council «1YVV« No communication was made from the, public. City Council Minutes July 1, 1992 Page 2 rrrrr♦ Dl. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 6/17/92 and 6/24/72; end Payroll ending 6/4/92 for the total amount of $2,311,535.56. D2. Approval of Appointrnents to the Rllingual, Senior and Sports Advisory Commences. D3, Approval to exceme Reimbursement Agreement for a Traffic Signal for Parcel Map 12263 located at the immsmtlon of Milliken Avenue and Kenyon Way, submitted by Hughes/Lyon /Milliken Associates. ITEM REMOVED FOR UISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A RFIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR PARCEL MAP 12263 D4. Approval to execute a one -year extension of existing Sweet Swiping Contract (CO 92 -063) and no adjustment of current price schedule categories, with Orange County Striping Services, Incorporated w be funded from Gas Tax Account No. 09 -4637-66028, Contract Services (FY 92 -93). D5, Approval to execute Memomndnm of Undersw cling to the Terra Vista Street Capping Agreement (CO 91- 079) to clarify acceptance of public improvements. D6. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Street Improvements at 10415 and I(A38 Vivienda Street, located between Haven Avenue and Ridgeview Avenue, submitted by Peter M. Sails. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -201 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT 10418 AND 10738 VIVIENDA STREET D7. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension fm Tract 13114, located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenuc and Calle del Pardo, submitted by Hayoun Development, RESOLUTION NO. 92-202 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13114 D8. Approval to accept Improvements and Notice of Completion for Tract 13727, located on the southwest comer of Highland Avenue and Camclian Sweet. City Council Minutes July 1, 1992 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -203 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13727 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE. OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D9. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13440, located on the northeast comer of Kenyon Way and Lark Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond S 379,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond S 37,900.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -204 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13440 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D10. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 9103, located on the east side of Aspen Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Red Oak Street. Release: Faithful Performance Bom1(Stmet) S88.000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 92 -205 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9103 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DI 1. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 13825, located on the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) S 302,555.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (StrecQ $30,255.00 RESOLUTION NO, 922115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP L3825 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK DI2, Approval to accept the Sierra Madre Socet Improvements, from Arrow Room to 9th Street, Contract No. 91074, as Complete, Release Bonds and Authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT. City Council Minutes July 1, 1992 Page 4 RESOLUTION N0, 92 -207 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR SIERRA MADRE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM ARROW ROUTE TO 9TH STREET, CONTRACT NO. 91 -074, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D13. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue at A.T. & S.F. Railroad Crossing, Contract No. 92-005, as Complete, Release Bonds and Authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." RESOLUTION NO. 92 -208 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HAVEN AVENUE AT THE AT, & S.F. RAILROAD CROSSING, CONTRACT NO. 92 -005, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Bugwt, seconded by Alexander to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items D3 and D12. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D3. Approval to execute Reimbursement Agreement for a Traffic Signal for Parcel Map 12263 located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Kenyon Way, submitted by Hughes/Lyon /Milliken Associates, Mayor Stout Stated that this particular reimbursement agreement calls for the City to reimburse the William Lyon Company for a traffic signal at Milliken and Kenyon at a time when that particular intersection warrants it, in other words, at a time when traffic has increased to the point where the engincers indicate that a light would be necessary. He stated Hughes /Lyon/Milliken Associates agreed to pay for this signal at the present time and that this reimbursement agreement would pay them back at some later future date. He stated his concern was the way the agreement is worded, it didn't give the City any discretion when that particular occurrence would come. He asked what would happen if four years from now that particular intersection warrants a traffic signal. but dare are others in the City that warrant traffic signals that the City feels are mm necessary than this one. Ile stated according to this agreement, this would be the priority for a traffic signal installation. He asked if there was some way to word the agreement so that it is not mandatary to put this light in when there might be others that am more necessary. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated normally this reimbursement would work similar to how the City reimburses for storm drains. He stated there would be a certain percentage (generally 10% of the systems fund) set aside for reimbursement. Tic stated all the projects am then matched against that percentage and each one receives a pm ram share of the systems fund. He stated this signal would not be paid off in one lump sam. lie stated it also states in the agreement that if the City Engineer states funds are not available, there would not be any mimb orient. He felt there was flexibility to control this. Mayor Smut asked if legal counsel was comfortable with this. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, suggested this he delayed for two weeks for further clarification Mayor Smut asked that the agreement clarify this further. City Council Minutes July t, 1992 Page 5 ACTION: To come back at July 15, 1992 meeting DISCUSSION OF ITEM D12. Approval to accept the Sierra Madre Street Improvements, from Arrow Route to 9th Street, Contract No. 91 -074, as Complete, Release Bonds and Authorize the City Engineer to rile a "Notice of Completion." Mayor Stout slated the street lights arc not in at this location, and asked if they were secured in some other way Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated yes. RESOLUTION NO. 92 -207 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR SIERRA MADRE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM ARROW ROUTE TO 9TH STREET, CONTRACT NO. 91 -074, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 92 -207. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. a• e a +• • a . e a�S�iTii [iT.i7fr�IFAB17ZflNi7i.L Dcbm J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 485 -A. ORDINANCE NO. 485-A (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 9.24.220 OF CHAPTER 9.24 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL. CODE PERTAINING TO RENEWAL OF MASSAGE TECHNICIAN LICENSES MOTION: Moved by Buquel, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 485 -A. Motion carried unanimously, 5.0. ..r n. Fl. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 1991 UNIFORM CODES Staff report presented by Jerry Grant, Building Official. (The public hearing had been closed at the previous meeting: therefore, there was no need to open it at this time.) Debra J. Adamq, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 497. City Council Minutes July 1, t992 Page 6 ORDINANCE NO. 497 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.08, 15.12, 15.16, 15.20, 15.28, 15.32, 15.36, 15.40, AND 15.44 OF TITLE 15. BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE "UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ", 1991 EDITION; "THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ", 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES THERETO; THE "UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS ", 1991 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE', 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES; THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE ", 1991 EDITION, INCLUDING ALL APPENDICES; THE "UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS ", 1991 EDITION; THE "UNIFORM HOUSING CODE ", 1991 EDITION: THE "UNIFORM BUILDING SECURITY CODE ", 1991 EDITION; AND THE "UNIFORM SIGN CODE ", 1991 EDITION: WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO SAID CODES, INCLUDING PENALTIES RESOLUTION NO. 92-209 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. MAKING EXPRESS FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE CITY'S BUILDING REGULATIONS, AS ADOPTED BY ORDNANCE NO. 497, ARE REASONABLY NECESSARY BECAUSE OF LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL OR TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS MOTION: Moved by Alexander, secomled by Wright to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 497. Motion carried enmimously, 5 -0. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 92.209. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. •tit * . F2. CONSIDERAILQNDEJRESIDENIIAL ANDCOMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL REFUSE RATE REVIEW - City Council will consider a potential rate adjustment for refuse Imes for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Staff report presented by Dianc O'Ncal, Management Analyst 11. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO, 92 -210 A RESOLUTION OF THE CICY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTING WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Moved by BuqucL sceonded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92 -210. Motion carried unanimously 5.0. City Council Minutes July L 1992 Page 7 Councilmember Wright asked that a review of optl'm', for working with the Local Government Commission regarding their hook they have just released on financing integrated waste management programs, which includes suggestions for ways to generate operating revenues for recycling programs and composting ideas to meet this requirement, be referred to the Environmental Management Commission. She stated she would like to give the Commission a time frame to come up with solutions as they work with the LGC. She felt they should look at options other cities are using to got Rancho Cucamonga's rates the lowest possible by using other altematves that other cider have come up with. She felt this should come back in 90 days with a report back to the City Council. Councilmember Alexander stated he would also like to get an update as to how the curbside program is doing at this same time. Councilmember Williams asked how long it would take in see if the curbside program would reduce the City's Upping amount- Dime O'Neal, Management Analyst II, stated they would bring this information back in 90 days. Councilmember Buquet stated he felt the residents were very happy with the mash companies because they arc doing a good job. He felt tore was a complete turn around from what it used to be years ago. r eerie F3. Staff report presented by Banye Hanson, Sr. Mayor Stout opened the morning for public hearing. There being no response. the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 92-1211 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDED PARCEL MAP 11891 MOTION; Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve Resoluliou No. 92 -211. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. No items submitted. .«err• HI. CONSIDERATION OF A RE$Ok,UTION RELATING TO T'HE FORMATION OF A SEPARATE IMPROVEMENT AREA WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 9L-1 Staff report presented by Linda Daniels. Deputy City Manager. City Council Minutes July 1, 1992 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 92212 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO ESTABLISH IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. I OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 91 -1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF AN ADDITIONAL SPECIAL TAX WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 91 -1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF AN ADDITIONAL SPECIAL TAX WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 91 -1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 92 -212. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0. rr •rrr No items submitted. No items were identified for the nest meeting. K. COM:]LNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communieadon was made from the public. rrrrrr 111191 Cgll Hibi I �igll l7 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss pending litigation. Motion carried unanimously, 5.0. The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. At the conclusion of Executive Session at 8:20, the Council announced the approval of the annual renewal of the City Manager's agreement. Respectfully submitted, Debut J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Algxovcd: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA LIST OF WARRANTS FIN PERIDC: 0I -01 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 07/01132 PA:.:: 1 . . . . . . . . VE400R ..........uu.......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c................ • ................. NAME uu..vu.................................... v• . u.•...... . u...•... • ................................... ITEM CESCRIPIION NARR NO uu........... NARR. AAT. v..................... A* CMECMV OVERLAP 14 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY VOID CHECK LOST 67229. 751.00 - C<< 51230 - 68135 >>> 1135 ALIGNMENT L BRAKE SPECIALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT *592 0 68136 141 -2')- (« 68137 - 60265 >>> 228 RANCHO COCA REOEVELOPMLNT AGENCY ANNUAL PAYMENT OF CITY LOAN 682660 2076.E6d -97 <<< 68267 - 68269 >>> 3364 itH AVENUE GRAPHICS RUBBER STAMPS 68270 36.54 10 A G R TIRE SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 68271 2.676.05 7 LdLETRCNIC.S ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS 68272 28.07 654 ACE LOCK L KEY KEYS 68213 7.54 .798 ALdANO. ANTHCNY REIMS MUNICIPAL R URBAN TREE CARE 68274 25.50 6898 ALUMTAR. KRISTIN REFUND CLASS 43010 ACT 199374 68275 27.50 6899 ALCANIAR, PATRICIA REFUND CLASS 12150 ACT 199376 60276 15.00 6900 ALLEN, LIMCA REFUND CLASS 12301 ACT 499666 68217 30.00 1135 ALIGNMENT L BRAKE SAECIALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 4592 * 68278 263.57 6891 ALLEN, TAMMY REFUND FOR PLAYSCHOOL CLASS 4303 68219 39.00 1430 AMEPICAN ROSINESS FORMS USE ACTIVITY REPORT FULL SIZE 1 68280 3.588.32 3514 ANDERSON, SHARI TEEN CAMP REC ASSISTANT PRE 6128 68281 247.50 ZC8Z AUDIO GRAPHICS SYSTEMS MEGAPMCNES FOR AQUATICS 68202 514.62 383 AUSTIN -FOUSY ASSOCIATES, INC CITYWI[E TRAFFIC STUDY 68283 31298.02 2616 AUTO PARTS CCNPANY, INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 1631 1 68204 17.00 402 AUTO RES70RAT0RS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 68285 105.54 6901 ANADALLA. JACLYN REFUND CL45S 42001 ACT 499480 60286 35.00 6902 ANADALLA, FICHELLE REFUND CLAS> 42001 ACT 899479 68287 35.DO 1061 AWARDS BY CHAMPION TROPHIES 4 68288 797.35 6153 BARCLAYS LAY PUBLISHERS TITLE 25 CLMPLETE AMENDMENT 1 68289 146.14 6903 BARTEL, MART FA REFUND CLASS 02130 ACT 1100543 68190 30.U0 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE MUSE, NOZZLE, FLAT MASHERS 68291 21.23 3ZZ7 BAYLESS STATIONERS 6FFICE SUPPLIES 0 68292 649.68 6892 0ERkIAN. DEBBIE RPFUNU cue SCOUT PACK643 GRADUATION 68243 50.00 1338 BIG A AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE LICIT *230 0 68294 170.30 2301 BITTNER, ANY DAY CAMP COUNSELOR PRE 6126 29.SMRS 68295 162.25 1247 BLAKE PAPER CO.. INC. SENIUR MINI EVENTS 68296 189.26 690. 6OPOS, AGMES REFUND CLASS OZ140 ACT 499120 68297 10.00 2807 ESN SPORTS WEST EQUIPMENT RENTAL SUPPLIES 60298 2D4.I0 576 3ULLER, BRAe REIM3 ROSINESS RELITEO EXPENSE 68299 40.00 1229 CALIFUR6iA BUSINESS SYSIEMS REPLACE SWITCH 68300 5).65 594 CALIFORNIA CASUALS. T- SHIRTS FUR PLAY CAMP PROGRAM 1 60301 2.323.11 3305 GARDE PACIFIC CCRRORATION SWEEPER PARTS 68302 105.86 6905 CASTILLO, LLCIA REFUND CLASS 47010 ACT 0100139 60703 3'3.60 6906 CASTRO, JONATHAN REFUND CLASS 85040 ACT 199523 68304 3,.00 6907 CHAN. KAREN REfVNO CLASS 12013 ACT 499379 58305 20.00 6908 CHIN. NINA REFUND CLASS 02073 PCT A99379 68306 LU.00 713 CHICK'S SPORTING GOODS INC YOUTH SPOPTS EQUIPMENT • 60307 04D.45 6909 COBBS, JEFFREY REFUND CLASS 05012 ACT 1100105 60309 28.60 6917 COMBS. EOMARG REFUND IN LIEU FESS FEES OR dB-II 68309 37.•:16.92 6910 CREAMER. LINCSAT REFUND CLASS VZOTZ ACT 01008d9 A 68310 24.00 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER GIST 4B CU FT 1 663I1 1.071.51 85 CUCAMONGA CC WATER LIST TESTING /RCPAIR 04C%FLOM DEVICE 1 68312 ).340.56 6911 CURRY. RUSSELL REFUND CLASS 44010 ACT 199534 68313 27.50 6912 CURTIS• LAURA REFUND CLASS A7002 ACT 099909 68314 33.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONEA LLST OF WARRANTS FOR PERI00: 07 -01 -92 (91/92) RUN DATE: 07 10I 292 PAl. -: •.. a.. .................... ... a........................................ a... .................................... - . . . . . . . . . . . . . V E WCOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO vARR. AMT. ........... A .................................................................................... 4... ............................a.. 41 CHECFI OVERLAP 462 CUTLER STEEL CCMPANT CURED E DRY CONCRETE BLADES 1 68315 492.57 462 CUTLER STEEL COMPANY OVERPATMENT OF GUS. LTC. 012676. 68116 6.00 239 0 L F CONCRETE LO BASE LINE W/O CARNILIAN A 68317 1.E45.77 6913 DANIELS, HELEN REFUND CLASS 13100 RCT 099005 68318 20.00 6897 DAVEY RGOFINU INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIE. 015805 68319 8.10 1762 DENSON, JAMES MILEAGE REINS RESTRM LOCKUP 6/20 68320 101.92 1087 DEPENDABLE AUTJ SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 1614 68321 36.95 105 DERSISH GUERRA E ASSOC. PLAN CNECK SERVICES THRU 6/35 0 68322 11.758.00 6914 DOUGLASS, CLIFTON REFUND CLASS 19054 ACT 0100999 683!3 36.50 640 DRESCO REPRUCUCTIONS BLUEPRINT PAPER C SUPPLIES 65324 100.2? 2379 OUFFY. MARK TEEN CAMP RIC. LEADER PPE 6/28 68325 360.00 523 EASTMAN. IRC OFFICE SUPPLIES 60326 423.24 6915 ERICKSGN, LOCO REFUND CLASS 19089 RCT 1101132 68371 35.00 6093 ESCAPE TRAVEL OVER PAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 119384 68324 59.00 6916 ESPINOZA, ANTHONY REFUND CLASS 85034 ACT 1100289 68329 28.60 9015 FASIS. JCE REFUND CLASS 0 9054 - ACT 0 101046 65330 31.50 2391 FILMS INCORPORATED EN7_RTAINME4T ADVENTURES OF MILD C OTIS 68331 240.00 2840 FORD OF UPLAND. INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 68332 5.20 9053 FOURNIER, CURTIS REFUND CLASS A 2070 - RCT 1 99363 68333 12.00 9035 FOURNIER, DIANE REFUND CLASS 0 7020 - RCT 0 97706 68334 39.60 1128 FRAMATIC BO>: FRAME 11 1 14 GREY 1 68335 117 .2 2 /v 9004 4AN T. EMERSCN REFUND CLASS 1 3210 - RCT 1 94903 68336 16.50 1464 GARCIA. ANY SCOREKEEPER - PPE 6120192 68337 121.50 9031 GEAGA. LEAH REFUND CLASS 0 3070 - RCT 1 100847 68338 ZT.50 9012 GIKAS. PHIL REFUND CLASS 1 3110 - RCT 0 99689 68339 ZO.DU 9013 GILL. JIM REFUND CLASS 0 3110 - RCT 0 99690 6834D 20.00 9014 GILL. MARGARET REFUND CLASS 0 3110 - RCI 0 99691 60341 20.00 499. GILIl. CHRI61DPnEF TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 68342 37.50 9043 GILLIANO. BROOKE REFUND CLASS A 3010 - RCT A 99141 683.3 27.50 9044 GILLILAND. BAILEY REFUND CLASS 0 3010 - RCT 9 99142 68344 ZT.50 1035 GILLILAND. STEVE TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 68345 675.24 3388 GULDEN BEAR ARbORISTS. INC. MISC. TREE MAINTENANCE - LAO 8 6 68346 7T.IOB.UU 9021 GOLOSMORTMT, ANNIE REFUND CLASS 1 1040 - RCT A 100245 68317 39.60 3022 GOLOSWGRTHY. RICHARD REFUND CLASS. 1 7040 - RCT 0 100244 68348 39.60 9034 GOMEZ, JONATHAN REFUND CLASS A 5001 - RCT A 97712 68349 $7.20 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 945 -1656 4 68350 11200.39 9008 HAIDL. GREG REFUND CLASS 4 5012 - RCT 1 99977 65351 20.60 903? HARLOW. JU517K REFUND CLASS 1 3100 - ACT 1 99329 60352 20.00 9036 HARLOW. STEPHEN REFUND CLASS 1 3100 - ACT A 99328 68353 20.00 9039 HAROLD, BRITIANY REFUND CLASS 4 4054 - RCT 0 99251 68354 13.75 9038 HAROLD. RYAN REFUND CLASS 4 4111 - RCT 4 99252 68355 2].00 9016 HARRE. ASHLEY REFUND CLASS 0 9045 - RCT 0 101048 68356 31.50 9027 HARRIS, WENDY REFUND LL455 4 4103 - RCT 1 99454 66357 25.00 3021 4ARRISOM. PICNAEL E. ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL - PPE 6128/92 68358 50.00 3152 HARRISON. PICNAEL N. ADULT SDCCLR UFFICIAL -PPE 6/28/92 60359 50.00 9054 HARSEN. CARRELL REFUND CLASS 0 2070 - RCT 1 100977 63360 12.00 3128 HAVEN PLAZA MEDICAL GROUP OMV PHYSICAL- PREPLACEMNT PHYSICALS 68361 17..00 3441 HEAVYSICE, PETE ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL -PPE 6/20/92 68362 50.00 3453 MEIN. PAT INSTRUCTOR PMT IN FULL CLASS 0 8000 68353 158.'0 9040 nELTON, DEREK REFUND CLASS 4 4052 - RCT • 99200 ERIE, 13.75 9010 HELTON. JcSSICA kEFURO CLASS 9 4122 - ACT 4 99043 66365 L.OU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF vARRANTS FIR PERIOD: 01 -01 -92 (91/92) ........ ...................................... RUN DATE: 07/0113_' P4.1 VENDOR .. ..................................... NAME a.....•..............••....••....uu......... u ............................uu.............. ITEM DESCRIPTION VARR NO .AA•u..•......................uv ................................ WARD. AMT. v... v..... t9 CHECKB OVERLAP 1360 FERCHENRCOER, KRISTIN CAMP CUCAMONGA 9IRECTOR -PPE 6/28/92 68366 426.52 1832 PERCHENACEGER. LAURI DAY CAMP REL ASST. PPE 6128/92 68367 30. ?.S 1833 H.RCHENROECER, LISA OAT CAMP COUNSELOR -PPE 6126192 . 60 368 173.15 9046 HERNANDEZ, JANIS REFUND CLASS A 2130 - ACT A 99023 68369 30.00 3408 HINSON, AEITM SLOG.CCV.REC.ASST. - PRE 6/20/92 66370 369.89 9009 HOET6£R. MEGAN REFUND CLASS A 3U54 - ACT F 99632 68 371 22.SU 2255 HOLT -5 AUTO ELECTRIC REBUILT ALTERNATOR 68372 91.5.1 1056 nOVEY ELECTRIC. INC. SILVER MOUNTAIN NAY R.000AMONLA 60373 660.00 495 HTOPO -SCAPE PRODUCTS. INC IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 6d374 77.92 9019 IBA. ROSIE REFUND CLASS 9 7050 - ACT 0 100206 603T5 39.60 3059 IN 4 OUT PAINT L BODY CENTERS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 68376 203.00 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT SHIA AVE. - RANCHO CUCAMONGA M 68377 32D.35 9DO3 INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM SEFVIC -S OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 9 22056 68378 25.00 165 IVGRAM PAPER PAPER SUPPLIES 68379 374.00 1952 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD. RILEY'S FARM - YUCAIPA 68380 300.00 9, INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN ACCOUNT 4 1079032 68181 22.68 3452 INTRAVAIA ROCK L SAND WALK OF BARK 66382 544.14 4999 JIM'S TARO SERVICE OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 4 21513 68383 5.39 3379 JOHNSON. KELLY ADULT SOCCER SUPERVISOR -PPE 6/28/92 68384 36.00 9028 JULIANA CO. REFUND CLASS A 6100 - ACT 4 100305 68385 95.00 ( ; 9007 KlX• ROBERT REFUND CLASS 1 8 00 3 - ACT A 99971 68396 16.00 v 9053 KELLY. STACET REFUND CLASS 4 4110 - RCT 0 98946 68361 25.00 9032 KELLY. TRAVIS REFUND CLASS 4 4053 - ACT A 100072 68388 13.75 3396 KELSEY. R06ER ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL - PPE 6/28192 68389 50.00 9051 KIENGSIRI. JESSE REFUND CLASS A ZD70 - ACT 0 99345 69390 12.00 9002 KIM'S ORIENTAL FOOD OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. A 20920 69391 23.9. 2711 KITCHEN. JAI ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL - PRE 6/28/92 68392 100.00 115 KMART STORES SENIOR MINI EVENTS SUPPLIES 0 60393 118.25 1218 KNOX JI.SAW CORDLESS 4300 ON 4 68394 129.01 9006 KOBELIN, MIDGE REFUND CLASS 4 7040 - ACT 0 100049 69395 39.60 9018 K08ELIM. LORI REFUND CLASS 4 1050 - ACT A 100046 68396 39.60 9030 KUSARIK, CASSANDRA REFUND CLASS 4 9045 - ACT 9 100824 68397 31.50 9029 KOSARIK. HILLY REFUND (.LASS 4 9045 - ACT A 100923 65390 31.50 321 LANDSCAPE WEST JUNE 1992 - AND 6 4 68399 191771.50 9000 LARSON, KIRK REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES 4 68400 ZS.S3 049 LAWSON PR000`TS. INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SAARI 700.83 4998 LEWIS CMEM CRY 1 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 23934 68402 19.10 979 LEWIS MCMES Y REFUND OF CASH DEPOSIT -TRACT 113351 68403 21500.00 9045 LOGAN. ERIC REFUND CLASS 0 3100 - ACT 0 99004 68401 IO.OU 3476 LOIKO, STEPHEN SOUND MONITORING ETC. - PPE 6/28192 6B405 217.25 901T LOPEZ, KELLI REFUND CLASS A 6000 - ACT 0 100715 60406 50.00 3023 LUNT, BRENT A. ADULT 8.0. OFFICIAL /PPE 6/28/92 68407 79.,0 9047 MAC DONALD, JENNIFER REFUND CLASS 4 4011 - ACT 0 99036 68400 ZT.50 9048 MAC DONALD, MINOY REFUND CLASS 4 4031 - ACT 0 99037 68409 ZT.SO 9049 MAC DONALD, PISST REFUND CLASS A 4031 - RCT A 99038 68410 27.50 9052 MAGNUSEN. LINDA REFUND CLASS 0 3000 - ACT 4 99337 68411 27.50 2952 KAILSORI. INC. REEF ENDING 6/20/92 4 Sall, 159.65 549 MARIPOSA MCRTICULTURAL ENT.INC. MAY 1992 4 68413 44.998.00 76 MARKMAN.APCZTNSKI.ASNSJN.L KING SERVICES DORI., MAY 1992 68414 30.391.95 9024 MARTIN. ASHLEY REFUND CLASS A 9044 - RC( A 100110 60415 31.50 9025 MARTIN. JEFF REFUND CLASS A (056 - ACT . 100123 68.16 31.50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FCH PERIOD: 01 -01-92 (91/92) ...........I..•.............._.. RUN DATE: 01 /01/32 PAGF: ........ RE VODR ...........I. ....................................................................... NAME ...A..............................I...... ITEM DESCRIPTION ..qR NO v.... u..... u...I................. u u u.o............... M4Rk_ AYT. ............ ..... .................. M0 CHECK. OVERLAP 9023 MARTIN, JESSICA REFUND CLASS 4 9044 - RCT F 100109 68417 11.50 2912 MARTIStl, ELIAS DAY CAMP REC ASST. - PPE 6/29/9`` 684L8 170.15 )042 MARTINEZ, JLL:E REFUND CLASS A 4140 - RCi A Y90 VO 68.19 25.00 9001 MASINO PLA :TEQINO INC. OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. . 21012 68420 22.91 2199 nC ARDLE. TRACI ADULT SOCCER - PPE 6128/92 68421 35.00 9033 MC LOUGHLIN, C1141 REFUND CLASS 0 9056 - RCT 4 101224 68422 31.50 9020 MENDEZ, JAY REFUND CLASS 0 9054 - RCT # 100161 63423 31.50 9005 NERVYN'S EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PARTIAL REFUND- JVERMNT /RM RENTAL 68424 5.00 9026 MESSMER, CHRISYOP.ER RcFUNO CLASS 4 5030 - RCT A 10O186 68425 57.10 ZA1S NEVER, CHARLIE 041 CAMP - PPE 6/28/92 1 68AZ6 127.25 4997 MOBILE MONEY, INC_ OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 14758 68417 9.00 9041 MORRIS. LAURA REFUND CLASS A 4031 - RCT 4 99061 68.28 27.50 4530 MOSLEY, INGIE REFUND CLASS 4 3102 - RCT A I0070S 68429 20.00 4529 MOSLEY. GREG REFUND CLASS 4 3102 - RCT A 100706 68430 20.00 842 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL tMC. REP4IR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 68431 1.09 1910 MOY_R PRODUCTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 68432 3.048.48 SYS M B S /LOYRV COMMUNITY FACILITIES 01ST. 4 88 -2 68133 11180.00 2196 NAIAD EQUIPMENT CO. LAMP. OPTICAL READER 68434 .1.70 4461 NATIONAL RECREATION C PARK ASSOC. EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR - POSTAGE 68435 22.50 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES 0 68436 366.76 2976 NELSON. R001W CAMP CUCAMCNGA CQUNSELQR -PPE 6128 66437 96.25 2440 NEN30NN, LISA BALLROOM DANCE - JUNE 13 66438 65.00 9011 U'CONNEA. FEGHAN REFUND CLASS 0 4122 - RCT A 99644 68439 25.00 365 OLD QUAKER PAINT COMPANY LATEX 5EBI -GLOSS ENAMEL 66440 267.22 2686 OSBORN, BETH A.SOFTBALL SCORENEEPER -PPE 6114/92 68.41 60.70 235 OWES ELECTRIC SVC CALL /[K WIND SENSING UNIT 0 69442 E28.85 1826 PACTEL CELLULAR A/C 40421164 A 68443 F65.2c 5822 PADILLA. CURIIS CLASS REFUND 040311 RCT 199092 68444 17.50 5823 PA00.LA, GERAIS CUSS REFUND 04031. RCT A99595 60..5 270D BIB PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. PRE MIX CONCRETE 68446 40.95 5824 PATEL. "ALA CLASS REFUND 09050. RCT 4100034 68447 31.50 3404 PELTIER, KEVIN - OFF -SITE CLASSES, REC ASST 68.43 I00.3B 6013 PETERSON, BNSAN ADULT SOFTBALL SCOREKEEPER 68.49 20.25 2SR7 PETERSON, LILLI 00 -HUTS FOR SR. ADVISORY 1 68450 70.74 2812 POMONA FENCE CCMPANY FENCE 9EPAIR- 4TMICHURCH PK.FLD CNTR 68451 1.370.00 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY SHIRTS 6 PANTS- UTTEN, AOAME.YNIGUEZN 68452 112.33 3509 PUPPET P0.0 LL CT SCNSI RISC PUPPETS 0 6B453 496.09 6106 JULLL CORECRATILN PRNTR R1030N. CKIDATA MICROLINE A 6845. 663.17 418 R M A GROUP FROG PMT CHURCH 01 SOILS&RAT ISIS 4 68455 11195_50 5125 RAKOSI, JULIE CLASS REFUND 47001, RCT#10069 1 68456 64.50 2842 RAMOSI NICOLE LIONS CENTER. REC. ASST 69451 134.39 607 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TROPHY C GIFT PLACE PLAUUFS L RIBBONS 1 68458 520.19 3343 RANCHO A061LE HOMES SERVICE HOUSING REHABILITATION 010 68459 2.420.00 5816 YEOMAN. MIKE CLASS REFUND 19071, RCT41011OZ 68460 50.00 3430 REMRIG PACIFIC COMPANY IN GALLON RELY 3IN /CR MEMO 66779 68461 31645.16 ZB32 REYES. ANNE ADULT SOFTBALL, SLOREKEEPER F 68462 606.25 112 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS FILM PRUCESSINS 0 68463 55.47 275 RIVERSICE dLLEPRINT DAITO PRINT FEU VELLUM A 6846. 148.41 5027 RODRIGUc2, SARA CLASS REFUND 11300. PCT .99305 68465 30.00 2818 SAMAMA CEVELCPMENT CO.. INC. DEPOSIT REFUND TR.:16211PERIIRC184 68466 2.500.00 5828 SALDIVAR, SARAH CLASS REFUND #4053. RCT499478 66457 13.75 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FLR PERIOO: 07-01 -32 (91/92) RUN JAIE: 01/01/92 PA .:: 5 . �.. ........................................... ....................A............. v•.+.....A •... • . ••..... a....... ............... VElDCR NAME ITEM U[SCRSPTION NIRR VO M ➢NN. G +T. .. ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ..................................... u. ... uu............................... a :.... a . 5129 2202 571 261 5830 S716 5450 11D5 535 351 1327 2372 3278 317 1432 319 5209 397 2971 5831 2312 5832 3034 836 5833 5062 3.09 3321 5284 S934 5835 489 5837 5836 5638 3481 1103 478 5639 5840 637 5841 3496 5542 5843 5844 94 2098 58.5 371 SALTER L ALGER INS. SVCS, INC. SAMPLES. KELLY SAN dERN CC CFFICE OF MNGMNT SVC SAN BERN CO PRINTING E MAIL SVC SCARBRQLGHSSISSCN SCHEURICM. AANELIESE SCHWEIGERT. MELISSA SEAL FURNITLRE L SYSTEMS INC. SEMPLE. JUDY SIGN SHOP. THE ,MART L FINAL SMITH, CEa8IE SO CALIF EDISON 50 CALIF ECISON CO. 50 CALIF EOISON- -LTTN: SHELL SO CALIF GAS CO. SOLIDS PROCESSING EQUIPMENT SOUTHERN DATA SYSTEMS SPENCER. OEBBIE L. SPRIGGS. BARBARA STATEWICE RENT L FENCE. INC. STRAIGHT. BRYAN SUNDERLAND, TIMOTHY A. TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TAYLOR. DONNA RAE TOBIN. TINA TRIMBLE, LATRINA TRUONG, RIP TORNEP, MAJASYN TURNER, MARY U HALLEY, PECAN UPLANO, CITY OF VAN DIPOLE. LYNN VANDENBLRG, BEATRICE VASQUE2, OTLAM GELLECLS. PARCEL VISTA PAINT c WARREN C CG.. CARL ` MEEELET. MICKIE WELSY, PILHELE WEST ENO UNIFORMS WEST. MKTTHEM WESTERN SCHCCL SUPPLY WHEATLEY, CIANE WILSON, JAMIE WILSON, LINDA WOLFINBARGER INC.. O.F. IAGDRIN. NEITM ZAINFELD, JACOB ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE LUNA CO. INC ♦t CHECKS OVERLAP OVERPAYMENT BUS LIC 919833 68468 13.24 DAY CAPP COUNSELOR 68469 142.34 MAY 1992 TELEPROCESSING NETNOR6 68470 263.00 MAY 1992 MAP SVCS 66471 54.25 REFUND OVERPAYMENT PERMIT 092 -3127 68472 30.00 CLASS REFUND 17060. RCT8100214 68473 19.80 CLASS REFUND 42060.NCT 499438 68474 20.00 ITEMS 116 6 17 5/6 TAXED 68475 2.1Z SENIOR FITNESS INSTRUCTORS 60476 114.00 1•%8.5• LAMINATIONS ADULT TENNIS 68-77 13.20 DAY CAMP SNACKS 0 68478 698.10 DAY CAPP COUNSELOR 68479 112.51 65 30 134 6690 02 000 9 9 6848D 570.61 43 30 G30 6501 01 0 68481 60.496.39 <<< 68482 - 68484 »> 61 30 210 1657 02 ODD T 4 68485 39.062.07 16 3107 835 2001 3 68486 1.195.76 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 021614 68487 48.95 6d- 92- T -1 - ➢2 WANG SYSTEM -JUNE 1992 66488 575.00 DAY CAPP 9 68489 176.25 RE FU NO BLUE-LIKE TRIP. ACT08438 68490 16.00 TEMPORARY FENCING INSTALLED 1 68491 21651.79 CLASS REFUND 96DOZ. ACT 9100230 68492 50.00 ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL 68493 50.00 ROUND UP 12 1LS 4 68494 724.77 CLASS REFUND 05210.RCT498123 68495 10.00 CLASS REFUND 69045, RCT0100241 68496 31.50 BUILDING COVERAGE. REC ASST. 68497 400.13 80 HAS 6/15 - 6/26/92 68498 668.00 CLASS REFUND 07060, ACT 098882 60499 10.00 CLASS REFUND 02060, OCT 098881 68500 20.00 CLASS REFUND 04170, 98948 68501 25.00 111 M GROVE AVE- A/C0614092610 68502 L14.46 CLASS REFUND 03110. ACT 499688 68503 20.00 REFUND GGLOSTRIKE TRIP ACT 48428 68504 15.00 CLASS REFUND 95011, ACT 8100023 68505 28.60 ADULT SOCCER OFFICIAL 68506 50.00 DORA GLIDE BASE A 69507 137.38 FILE 110661, HICKS 4 68508 502.80 CUSS REFUND 13110, ACT 499556 68509 2O.DD CLASS REFUND 14054. ACT 499108 68510 13.75 MA6 CHARGER BULBS QBSll 42.02 CUSS REFUND 15040, ACT 099828 68S12 39.00 CONSTRUCTION PAPER 0 68513 419.35 CLASS REFUND. ACT 12101 68514 30.00 CLASS REFUND 44170. ACT .98917 68515 15.00 CLASS REFUND 43110. ACT 099554 68516 10.00 O.G. -ZO YARDS 1 68517 177.70 ADULT TENNIS. COURT SUPERVISOR 68518 16.50 REFUND CLASS 02070. 99092 685[9 12.00 MISC 1ST AID SUPPLIES A 68520 311.7A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF NIRRANTS FCR PERIOD: 07 -01-92 (91/92) RUN OLTE: 07/01/92 VG:c: 5 v•....•......•............... vu....... .......................................o• o••..... ...................................... VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NI MR. AMT. .................. ............................................................................... ..................... .......... ... 1A CHECKI OVERLAP 5846 CERKLE. JEAN CLASS REFUND 16100. RCT 199782 68521 35.00 60 TOTAL 2.157.206.91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 07 -01 -9Z (92/93) RUN DATE: O2 102292 PAGE: I ....00...........•.. ............................................................................ ................................ VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARR. AMT. ...... ... ........................................................................................ ................................. L4 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY 264 2Z 6820 6894 6895 1333 .61 6896 2379 179 666 6180 2259 3520 3517 3515 179 3516 J ]526 3452 3599 1390 311 1961 583 3522 1187 3523 2628 326 209 209 2212 56 ]524 ALPMASETA AMERICAN PLBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION CF RECOROS MANAGERS BOTTOM LINE PERSONAL BOCCI. RICK CALIFORNIA MUSEUM FOUNDATION CARE AMERICA HEALTH PLAN DONOFRIO. ROE DUFFY. MARK E-1 RENTS FILAMENT PRO AUDIO FRAME N LENS OPTICAL INC. FRECKLES L CCMPANY "AIRES. FRANKLIN HUFF. BILL - 'POLYHEDRA' ICKES. SCOTT - •EQUINOX• KAISER PERAANENTE LAWSON FAMILY PUPPETS LEWIS. CARET - •HIGHWAY 6V MARIE CAL E A0 RS PIE SMOP "116 %AATIN. CUNHA - DAKOTA CDWBOIS MEMARV, LINDA PICDME PLUMBING CORPORATION PORCU, DANIEL PROTECTION SERVICES. INC. REYNOLDS. ROYCE RISA MANAGEMENT RUIZ. ROMAN SPEARS, PATSY STATE FARM FIRE S CAS INS SUN. THE THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP YOLK CLIP ART. INC. WELDING INOLSTRIAL 6 TOOL SUPPL HONG, DALE NW CMECRF AIRFARE NATIONAL CARE COMF 7/14 -18 <<< 68]66 WATERMELONS FOR 7/4 EATING CONTEST APWA MEMBERSHIP ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES D. ADAMS 1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTION BAND FOR T/4/92 RED HILL PARK ADMISSION FOR SD CHILDREN /A ADULTS JULY PREMIUM GROUP $10637 &AND HARONAY 7/4 RED MILL PARK CASH ADVANCE TEEN CAMP WEEK 2 2DA30 CANOPY 1 14192 RED MILL PARK SOUND SYSTEM OPERATION -JULY 4.1992 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. R 14717 ENTERTAINMENT - JULY ATM 1992 2 PERFCRMANCES /F.MAYNES MARIONETTES BAND /JULY 4TM 1992 - LI- 12:0QMRaM ENTERTAINMENT 112- 1:00P.M. JULY 47M JULY PREMIUM GROUP A 1932 $ TREASURE HUNT /FIELD TRIP JULY 15 BAHO /JOLT 4TH 1992 - 10 -11:00 $... 100 SM LEMON MERINGUE PIES-T /4/92 WESTERN SNOW'S 10- 4:o0P.N. JULY 41M HAT RICE.PETTING IOC.INSURANCE INSTALLLTEAR DOWN SINK WATRLWASIE A MIKE, JESTER, JUGGLER FOR JULY 4TH LIONS COMN CIA, ANNUAL MONITOR FEE $ SINGERS FOR ATM OF JULY 1992/93 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL BAND FOR 4TH OF JULY -RED HILL PARK BLUEGRASS MUSIC FOR JULY 4TH POLICY $9D 33 5016 8 12 WEEK SUBSCRIPTION SINGLE AUDIT. INFO SVC, NTNLY UPDTS I TR SUBSCRIPTION TO CLIP ART HELIUM FOR 4TH OF JOLT CELEBRATION NOT AIR BALLOON, TETHERED RIDES INS OVERLAP 68265. 60523 >>> 485LV 69$ZS 5 B 523 68521 68528 68529 68530 68531 68532 68533 68534 68535 68536 68532 49539 6B 539 68540 68541 68542 68543 60544 68545 68546 68547 68548 60549 68550 68551 68552 69553 68554 66555 68556 68557 68558 50.00 70.00 110.00 39.00 400.00 157.00 25.313.64 150.00 500.00 320.57 100.00 23.00 1.160.00 200.00 400.00 250.00 24.027.06 285.00 400. Do 200.00 400.00 1.150.00 350.00 265.00 1.120.31 400.00 48.00 400.00 300.00 3.195.00 50.43 221.00 222.30 120.03 1.025.00 RW TOTAL 63.622.85 CITY OF RANCH: CUCAMUNGA Lily JF WARRANTS FIR PEWf00: 02 -04-92 (91/92) RUN DALE: iT /Ua /i2 PA": 1 u.... ... . uu... .. .. .uu... .... . a. au...... .uuu vaua.... ....... ..... ......uu ... .... .. .... .. ............................... v ErCLR NA FE ITEM Oc SCRIPTION WARR NO WARP. AMT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ....................................... ...........•..................... a.......................... 62dw ESPIN92A. CLLGR" 33c I4%bET SPECIALTY PRJCUCTS I82e PACTcL CELLULAR A 5 I POCL L SPA CL: ANINo aERVICc A L K PMCTOGRAPMY Ace PRIN71Ke CO. AOINOLF, KRIS ALPFRT'S PRINTING ALTENES, CHRISLIWE AMERICAN bLSINtSS FURMS RSTRON CORPORATION AUTO PARTS CUMPRNY, INC 3AR50IAr NANCY dA.tLINE TRCE VALUE NAROwARE BAYLESS STATIONERS S- RNSTEIN. FILART BHAGAT, xElA SIG A AUTO PARTS bLACKHARK ENGINEERING dLAKE PAPER CO.. INC. 80RAL RESQL%CES, INC. BROWN. SHARON ORUBAK_A, DORIS C P CONSTRUCTION :ALIFORFIA CASUALS CALIFORNIA PAINTERS CANC6N0, KATHY CASA DE OAK INC. CENTRAL CITIES SILN SERVICE CHIEN, DAVID T. CHOU♦ JONATHAN CITRUS ADIDAS ONTARIO, INC. COAST ELECTRIC COMPOSER". INCORPORATED COMPU!ERLANG COOK /ARTHUR INC.. BUSINESS PROD. CORONA INDUSTRIAL SAND COMPANY CRUSH MASTER ASPHALT CUCAMONGA LC WATER GIST 0 L K CONCRETE CO DAMSEL, KATYLEcN CATAVAULT Oc TCL 01 CJNATC. Fakll UYC 10E J� 90 iS. JTeA Ib•nA nom. L•i S1:� • CHELK4 VUIO CtECA s kclSiU °_ - STALE DATED (<( 60:48 - ROUND LP 12/CS <<< 68195 A/CP1340138 PHONE T14 287 -4960 <<< 69562 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 016965 9VER9Al9tH3 OF BUS. LIC. 019292 MAYOR'S LETTFRMEAD PARTIAL REFUND SWIM INT BIT 9445 CONCERTS IN T6E PARK FLYERS REFUND CLASS TD02 BIT 099845 OVERPAYMENT Of BUS. LIC. 914160 POWER SUPPLY WITH BUILT -IN SPEAKER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2 SWIM REFUNDS PARENT /POT ROT 9543 PROPANE CREDIT MEMO SALESURD 11844787 REFUND CLASS 03010 ROT 0100649 REFUND CLASS $4060 ROT 0100657 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 4531 CHEMICALS FOR FOUNTAIN SUPPLIES 3 /8• FINE REFUND SWIM INT 8:10 II PCT $0720 REFUND OALAr OMA TRIP BIT 04462 REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 05178 PEE WEE BASEBALL T-SHIRTS CVCRFAIMENT Of BUS. LIC. •21165 OFFICE SUPPLIES OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 90561 STREET SIGNS REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT 15204 REFUND CLASS 95030 BIT 6101167 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE LGHTI&G SUPPLIES BALANCE OWED FOR FEBRUARY SERVICE LAOCR RtP4IR CANON APB00 TYPEWRITER RANCHO MIX- POLK CRUSHEC MISCELLANEOUS BASE «C 68600 EONS CC FT VINEYARD N/0 ALTA LOMA REFUND CLASS 0307 RCT $1474 DATA STJRAOE NAM. 3.OGE REFUND CLASS 46133 RCT 1101403 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REFUND sLOG PERMIT t91 -4241 REFUND CLASS .3012 NCI 499646 $ A Y Y Y CVERLAP 602479 68493 >>) 66494 66560 >>) 68561• 68,64 >>> 60565 66>66 66567 68 568 68569 68570 66571 60512 685T3 68ST4 655T5 60576 68517 68578 68579 6858D 68581 63582 68503 68504 68505 68586 68587 68583 68589 68590 68591 68592 66593 68594 66595 60596 68597 6B59d 66 599 6560D )» 68601 68602 68603 68604 68605 68606 60607 66608 68609 30.00 - II4.7T- 275.90 10.00 15.00 76-03 25.Ou 2.850.31 33.00 30.00 334.82 128.23 55.00 252.68 203.44 32.50 27.50 50.79 1.336.23 1T5.83 38.98 27.50 41.00 500.00 2.177.09 6.75 23.11 75.60 427.20 250.00 53.20 71.59 6.2> 63.15 365 -00 168.44 895.18 30.16 10.424.83 133.01 39.00 112.00 122.29 95.00 209.26 12.00 27.50 i I II " I I'll nl CUC44 Cl LAS( OF R.l RRa NTS F:R h810O: U7 -08-42 (91/92) RUN DAIt: UTIOPN2 +.....a.....A. VE.V GCS ..................................................... a A.... ................uu........... NAME .....................0 u. . u•.A.......... 1TIM Dt SCd I91i0N WARR NO u... A........................ A............ .................................• A.................... u. u... MAk R. AMT. J. CnECR! UVERLXP 5.i E.STMI,V. III CFPICt SUPPLIES 60610 14.81 �U II EOMARO F2HtM4N CC. OVERPAYMEVT OF BUS. LIC. 4 5806 60611 14.00 459 EGGHEAD S9FTNAIE EXCEL FOR M4CINTUS6 • 60612 110.92 .931 EN,ENBURG. NIUAEL Rzr UNJ C1-4SS A4131 RCT 099618 69613 25.09 626 EMERGENCY PcIILAL PRODUCTS, INC. DIGIT CARE GLOVES 6B 634 12.68 1056 F6TLANO, SANCT R[FUMO SOUND MONITOR - 1 HOURS 6951> 30.00 123 FEDERAL 'EXPRESS CORP 19DR782243 - 30365403 60616 20.00 155 FILARSXT L MATT CONTRACT SERVICES 68611 7dO.00 4021 FU"T]H4 PIPELINE INC. REFUND DEPOSIT - PERMIT 1 5285 SUITS 250.00 9078 FOOTLOCKER 6 8427 OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 1 19106 68619 68.71 2840 FORD OF LPL.N0, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 686ZO 31.42 v019 GA02A. MIMIC. SWIM REFUND - RCT • TOO 66621 21.50 3303 GOLDEN GEAR •RBORIST5. INC. SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT JUNE IS 1992 1 68622 15.508.00 1171 GREEN%000.5 UNIFORMS BREECnES.POLllv00L- .LTERA9ION CHAS 60623 265.49 130 GTE CALIFORNIA 941-0909 1 66624 649.14 9071 GUERRERO, JANET SWIM REFUND - RCT 1 584 68625 55.00 9067 MAGADORN. PATRICIA REFUND .01LA MOM' TRIP'- RCT 19463 68626 41.00 9075 HALL. BRUCE lUITION REIMBURSEMENT 68621 37.50 1073 ..NN.. LOUIS. REFUNU CLASS A 2050 - RCT 1 101322 68628 35.00 9057 MERBERGER, M.AL REFUND CLASS 1 305-404 - RCT 0 216 68629 52.00 ^ 9055 RIPPLER, SMIRLEY REFUND PLAT CAMP - RCT 1 244 68630 52.00 �-V 9069 HLAVM, MART RAY SWIM REFUND - RCT 4 1246 68631 27.,C (G< 69632 - 68632 »6 161 HOYT LUMBER CO.. S.M. MAINTCNANCE SUPPLIES A 60633 57.56 9066 HUBERT. ALISUN REFUND CLASS V 206 - RCT • 1269 68634 15_00 9061 LLANO* GILCA REFUND CLASS 0 6040 - RCT 4 99870 4 68635 52.00 9060 ILAN0. ROSCLI REFUND CLASS 1 9041 - ACT 1 99972 68636 11.50 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT ARCHIa ALD AVE. - RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 68637 327.80 2156 IND"TRIAL BRUSH CORPORATION VANGUARD dROOM RED 66638 476.80 19,2 INLAND EMPIRE STAGES. LTD. LOCAL CITY TOUR 68639 200.00 1076 INTEGRATED COATINGS INC. OVERPAYMENT OF bUS. LIC. A 0026 68640 32.40 9028 JULIANA CO. REFUNU CLASS 0 6130 - RCT 1 100307 68641 IS.p0 1929 JWP TELECOM INC. PROGRAM CHANGE A 68642 394.56 9064 KANTUCR, OELGRES REFUND CLASS 1 6110 - RCT 1 101327 68643 100.00 115 AM W STORES TOUT" PROGRAMS SUPPLIES 1 68644 195.28 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1 68645 200.97 1024 AGIN MATERIALS COMPANY SS -In EMUL 68646 336.)0 9010 KOLIES, TRACY SWIM REFUND - RCT 0 1101 60647 2T.50 9066 XONFTAMPCLLLAR, IRK& REFLNDIPEE WEE BASEBALL -RCT 1 454 68646 24.00 9065 KORCN65. MARILYN RFNU CLASS 03111-3120/R 1 100628 -9 69649 50.00 1075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY FLASHLIGHTS C TRAFFIC SAFETY VESTS 60650 148.66 9062 LE.ZN, hlt.l REFUND CLASS 4 9050 - RCT 4 10016 68651 31.50 1079 IEWFN. SUSAN OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 0 6754 68652 13.15 2952 MAI'_SORT. INC. WEEK Eh OING 6/30/91 68653 81.41 9063 MILES. CMUCX REFUND CLASS 4 6130 - ACT 6 101415 68654 95.00 W? MC ITa BIG. 1"I SWIM R.FUN0 - RCT A 0495 63655 27.50 9074 r +Cads. - .N:ANNA REFUND CLASS 1 4020 - RCT ! 100980 68656 25.00 �JNT AIN Y: -. SH.II c.w). kc P. td nAlIT.IANCE SUPPLIES 68657 45.15 ISIa M-, 1:5 FSL.. LtTp EA]ARI 25 GJL 68658 254.05 UNIFORM SERVICES 68659 25.25 :`.T VtMICLE MAINTENANCE 68660 32.71 L:TY 'IF NANL NO LLJLAM:I H6,4 LI,1 0 4A RNA TS FCR - + _RICO: D7 -Od -92 (31191) ......... I..... a..........uu....uva................a RUN CAT,: 07103112 PATE: 3 Vc9C].i .uu.......vu NAME u...uu.. u... a.. a... u✓.....0 aua..uu.uv...uu................... ...... ITEM ]E.CRIPTIUN NAMR NO uv... u. u.uu.....................uu ..... ................................. ........................... uP RR. AMT. Oa CMECKI OVERLAP 3OdO NUTQITIC6 CC6..CTICN OVERPAYMENT OF BUS. LIC. 1 14951 606e1 31.]6 vu 13 ]LSNEN. K..CN RLFUNU /PLAYDPOUND PROGRRM -RCT 14325 68562 90. JC _e40 ON -CALL COMMI,NICATIdNS ItlO11 -1 68663 45.00 67 ON -CALL PAGING 13011 -2 1 68661 150.00 235 CW£M ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 68665 27.90 5247 PARR VIKETARC JOINT VEKTLR: DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 14164 60666 L.000.00 3270 PERFECTION ALTO ADDY L PAINT OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 121172 68667 9.10 2u87 PETERSON, LILL[ ICE -LREAM C FILM OEV- S£NIGR BIRTHDI 68668 11.85 0848 PHILLIPS, CAROL CLASS REFUND 1351 -SWIM- PARTIAL REFN 68669 iO.00 2919 PICTURE THAT JOLT /PARK C REC MONTH T- SHIRTS 1 68610 1.041.20 542 PIP PRINTING CARO STOCA FOR SWIM CARDS A 68611 34.48 1307 PLAT COMPANY OVERPATMENT OF BUS LIC AL4671 68671 13.05 9649 POMPET LANDSCAPE DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 14731 68673 500.00 5850 PONCE OE LEON, CI4THIA CAMP CLCAMDNGA 7001. 7002.1010 68674 155.00 5851 PRIIZI. CLYNNE CLASS REFUND 1301, ACT 1330 68675 85.50 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MIT 46, NOR 4250. OUST CLOTH 1830 1 60676 48.Y0 5322 R C M CONCRETE OVERPAYMENT OF BU, LIC 119889 686]] ZZ.50 5852 RAMOS, ROCKY CLASS REFUND 17082, ACT 097725 68610 L6.00 5353 RANCHO PACIFIC DEPOSIT REFUND PERMIT 15242 68619 250.00 626 R4UL -S TIR, AND WHEEL, SVC CALL, OISMOUNTEMOUNT IE42L644 68600 8I.50 352/ RECRE06ICS CLAP. LIFtHULK W /b- ROLE 68681 52.66 9 545 RFD WING SHOE STORE WORK BCOTS- VARIOUS CITY TARO ARRAS 68682 490.85 2]e JIVER SICE 8 LE PRINT PMT PRINT 1O M12. PMT SETUP 68683 21.01 5854 ROBINSONt WILLIAM CLASS REFUND -PEE WEE BS- RCT4234 I IBIS. 46.00 5955 ROSENTHAL. LAURA CLASS REFUND 17030, 99183 A 68665 79.10 5556 ROSS, HEIDI ADULT VOLLEYBALL REFUND RCT10577 68686 220.00 16 ROTARY CORPORATION 4L- 2804310 PR6. 5EST.9W11 /2EOGER BE 68687 151.58 1298 SAN BERN CO ASSESSUR -5 OFFICE APRIL C JUNE '92 TAPE SUBSCRIPTION 68698 43Z.00 1230 SAN BERN CC LIBRARY 7/1/83- 6/30/90 - 7/1/90- 6 /30 /91REIMB 68689 49.865.30 133 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM CC. INC 2 SETS MDOEL 700 GUTTER BROOMS 68690 133.61 565T SANOOVAL, GAST G. SWIM REFUNC- RCT1257 68691 27.50 5658 SAWYERS, JAMIE CLASS REFUND .2051. RCT0101434 63692 30.00 5859 SAWYERS. ARISTA CLASS NEFJND AZ100, ACT 4101433 68693 30.00 Ti16 SCHAEFER D1YCN ASSOCIATES .R2- iI11/92 -P RO J -AR40Y AT BRIDGE 69694 595.50 5,160 SCH08EL. LYNNE CLASS REFUND 8EU0AOY BEG RCT11Z1 68695 55.00 5861 SCHULTZE, SMANOA SWIM CLASS REFUND RCT01151 60696 21.50 1105 SEAL FURWITLRE L SYSTEMS INC. PANEL-IACKABLE ACOUSTICAL 68691 309.54 5362 SEPCOM INTERNATIONAL OVERPAYMENT OF BUS LIC 920022 68698 9.40 5118 SHANKS. BETTY REF -t. MDHFRO 'OKLAHOMA' RCT18424 68699 41.00 5963 SIZEMORE, VIVIAN SWIM CLASS REFUND. ACIII40 68700 22.00 5064 SLOAN, TC61 SWIM CLASS REF -RCT.- 336 - PARTIAL REFN 68 TO 25.00 5865 SMITH, ELIZAE.TH DAY CAMP REFUND RCTS10048 66702 75.00 SS66 SMITH, KZCCLE CLASS REFUND 44000, RCT 1101050 68103 h.OU 3273 SO CALIF EOiSCN 70 30 142 0009 01 000 9 1 68704 346.65 C!C 68105 - 69708 >1> 1.432 SO CALIF iCSSJN --AST n: SHSILA LUK6 71 30 147 1051 03 000 1 1 68709 11..22.56 750 aECIALTY TYPERRITL3 1tRYICE CODE E6FORCEMENT -16N Rt PR26-47623i6 68710 28.09 34 ;6 STAPLCe COPY P6PE3 60711 .e67 SotnA'I SM. AIM CLASS RtFUNC -ADULT VOLLETbALLA8505 6d)12 220.00 .744 bLIEe DEALS DVERPMI BUS LIC 114904 68 71 3 IU.00 1[51 SYNPVJ IF, PTS SOFT.. RE AUPPORT 68714 450.00 C : I Y .= AA 84 HQ CVCA M 0.V6A -111 ,.F NARR4%IS FCR P..LUJ: 02 -08-91 (91/92) ................................................................................................... RUN DALE: 01108192 PL..: 4 VEY ^OR ................................ NAME ............................................................... ITEM -AC iCti ➢T ICN NARR NG ................................... ............................... Y.Pl- AMi. .O CHECK. CITPIAI 936 TARGET SPECIAL[♦ PRJCUCTS ROUND IF IZ/CS I 68115 1T1.04 1919 TOMARK SPORTS I6(.. DUDLEY SCFlhALL CORK CENTER, LEAThR 68116 2.341.95 341. VIKING OFF ICE PRODUCTS n91ST RELIEF PAD FOR KEYBOAR0 68117 142.Y5 PA63 VLASTOS, KATINA CLKSS FEFUNJ -TEEN CAMP- RC169561 6 871 125.00 ♦38 NARREN 4 LC., EARL FILE 015458. ANNA 80TD . 6813V 1.006.00 113 WAKIE, KL.EN -LING LOPP 135 SJFT PLUS T15SUE . 68120 513.12 5[69 RE98, STEPHANIE REFUND A.C.T.RCT.9323'SHP GRES REV' 68121 10.00 158 WE LOING 1NCLSTRIAL L TJGL 3GPPL 4CEILCNE L ARGON RENTAL . 68112 58.00 421 WEST PU9LISHIN6 CO CALIF.T9N11 COOES 68723 33.20 374 RE STERN EATEFMINAIOR A/C1676423-1 . 68724 213.00 3493 YE i TERN SCHCLL SUPPLY RISC SCHOOL SUPPLIES 68125 47.22 SdOl WLLOE. CEe6IE CLASS REFUND .3121. 98413 . 68126 53.00 53)0 WOOJBURT. CASEY CLASS REFUND RCT.0164 -SWIM CLASS 6d121 LT_;0 109 .,A01 CJRPCRATSOH 5090!4135 CEYELOPER . 68728 1.191.89 5d11 IELLAHIO LILIFJRN A. INC. OVERPAIRENT OF KOS LIC .17122 68729 23.00 .. TOTAL 113.81d.61 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOP PERIOD: 07-Oa -92 (92193) 9M TOTAL 74.230.98 N RUN PATE: 01/08/12 PASS: 1 v....cv _..�.. a +�.. ........ vEN60R .......... ...........................................................uu..... NAME ..............................................................uu....................... .................................. REM DESCRIPTION HARR NO WARN. ANT. ............................... *. CHECRA OVERLAP 6584 DAILY DONUT SUPPLIES EMP /COMMUTER OF THE MONTH 1 68267. 22.00 <<< 68268 - 68559 >>> 3296 PRINCIPAL FUTUAL JULY PREM. GROUP 019477 -1 68560• 59.856.42 «( 60561 - 68561 >>> 1258 ELLIS, JANA REFRESHMENTS PEP MEETING 7/9/92 685620 25.00 CC< 66563 - 68131 >>> 1245 GONSALVES F. SON, JOE 4. JULY SERVICES 68732 2.100.00 3530 `fA.ARP HO "HIT 1 YEAR SUBSCRIOTION 68733 48.00 2927 I.C.3_0. FOOTHILL CHAPTER MEETING 68134 30.00 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN ACCOUNT A JOTS009 7120/92- 6121/93 68735 90.72 3162 LET "S STOP IT RENT /JULY - STORAGE OF SUPPLIES 68736 11.96 3531 PITASSI. MR. PETER CITY TAM REFUND- PO35.4PNIOi6- 511-18 68737 156.68 2600 RANCHO CUCA!ON6A FIRE 9ISTRICT REIMB CIRCUS VARIES PERMIT FEES 68738 190.00 2383 RHOADES OEV.LOPMENT OVER PAYMENT PERMIT192-331913334 68139 1.20 2610 SAN BERN CO SUPERIOR COURT PMT R/V PURCHASE FOR 19TH ST PRCJ 68140 11.62500 5A19 SMA SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 68141 60.00 9M TOTAL 74.230.98 N CITY OF RANCHO CL "CA IONGA STAFF REPORT . �Zpclt� GATE: July 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF MEASURE I FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY -YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN AS REQUESTED BY SANBAG TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC RECORD of THE INTENDED USE OF LOCAL MEASURE I FUNDS It is recommended that the City Council adopt the prepared Measure I Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and 20 -year Transportation Plan as requested by SANBAG to provide a public record of the intended use of Local Measure I funds. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Measure I, the county -wide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction receiving program revenues annually adopt a Five -Year Capital Improvement Program and a 20 -Year Transportation Plan which outlines the specific projects upon which those funds shall be expended. Staff has prepared the attached Five -Year Capital Improvement plan schedule to be adopted by City Council and kept on file with the San Bernardino Associated Governments for informational purposes. The five - year list has been overprogrammed to allow for slippage and to insure that the adopted plan contains ample projects for Measure I expenditures. If changes are necessary (additions or deletions), the plan may be altered at each annual adoption or intermittently with City Council approval. Attachment C indicates that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive $5.4 million which averages out to $1.1 million over the first five years of the program. SANBAG has advised us the 20 -Year Transportation Plan for Local Measure I Funds can be a list of projects for a 20 year period or a narrative policy statement estimating the types of projects Local Measure I Funds are to be used for and the percentage of funds �s CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL OF MEASURE I FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY -YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN JULY 15, 1992 PAGE 2 allocated for each type of project. Since it is very difficult to list actual projects 20 years in advance, staff recommends Council approve the policy statement. The recommended policy statement is shown in Attachment 1. Respectfully submitted, Willi /am J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MO:Iy Attachment 13� RESOLUTION 40. CA a - a 1 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND TWENTY -YEAR TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE I FUNDS WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in November 1989 authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one -half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino, and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation Improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 89 -1 of the Authority, and WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance require each local jurisdiction receiving revenue from the tax to expend those funds pursuant to a Five -Year Capital Improvement Program and a Twenty -Year Transportation Plan adopted by resolution of the local jurisdiction, and WHEREAS, Expenditure Plans of the Ordinance also require that each local jurisdiction annually adopt and update the Five and Twenty -Year plans, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, hereby adopts the Measure I Five -Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty -Year Transportation Plan, a copy of which is attached to this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: t3 U 5 YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVENT PROGRAM - PROJECT COSTS PER YEAR PROJECT NAME ACTIVITY 92193 93194 9419S 95196 96197 PAVfhRNi Mf.N %.GE h1FNT PP.O(:HLM _ 51ARTt1P COSTS S S2W WO T T� - - - -� _ - 41JNUAL RFSURFAQRG S SaW Wp 5 5:00 M0 a a03o0J 5 5-MWCF 0 0.0010 ILAINTFWICL -OF PAVI M -.IJT IAANTGi'1.1(pT PHOGfU.M ` PAV MLNT INVENTORY S Sl WOI $ $7 WO I $ $'QO S ST WO ` `ANNJAI P OFTMFFCDEVIC( -S _ SS WO S SS 0001 S Si f%0� S S5UX) c II6,HIAND AVP AT ROOHFST`e Fi AVE �INTFRSECiKJN R RAPHOVFl.'FNT S _ S _ .:P %tOWIIOUif =PT SPRR W+O hllU IHFN _ RAILROAD CROSSING IhiPADVEMFNi S S:J 000 S SsW 000 _ R STREET WIt>ENINGA REHANII IiAl10N S SHW 000 _ pASF LIgF HD qT CAHNEtIAN ST I IN ?fiH5EGT10N IMf'HDVEMENl S SS OJO $ _ ({ASE UNE_HOAR AT 0.HC4 {(BALD AVE_ I INTEASEC,TION IMPFIOVEIAENi 5 55000 f f 000 j _ _ I I i % -LIYI qV FROM HISEI INC T(] 900 FT SHJ BASF( INE S STREET WIUENING B FlFSIIHFAf.ING 5 5145 WO _ _ A HSEY BI VD FROTA HAVEN TO RED OAK S STREET REHABILITATION 5 5340000 _ HERSEYBIAV IRON HEUOAK TO AT&SFRR $PHRR S STREET REHABILITATION 5 5530000 _ HiiF {1105& AVE FRO!_!PLA_CER TO HAMSHIHC S STREET REHABILITATION _ 5 5125 IX1U BASE LINE RD AT FIAVEN AVE I INTEL {SEC110NIMPROVEMENT 5 5310 WD KGHIAND AVE AT LOCUST ST I INTERSECTIONIMPROVEMLNT 5 5120 WD [AIiNFIIAN Si FROM HIII SI U ETOALMOND S STREET REHABILITATION S S450c00 BASE I INF LOAD AT SPAR CROSSING R RAILROAD GROSSING IMPROVI'LENT S S26D WO II ANY AN STREET F [{OMFASiWOOU TD HELL MAN S STREET WIDENING& REEIABiLITA?ll S SI ID WD HIILMANAVE FROM BASE LINE NOTED I9TH ST S STREET WIDENING &REHABILITATION S Sa60_WO HFRMOSAAVE FROM HILL SIDE TO VISTAGROVE S STREET REHABILITATION 5 51110000 Hi'RAIOSAAVE FROM WD HIGH( AND TO BRISTOL S STREET REHABILITATION _ 5150000 _ _ I+FRAIOSA FROM S /OMAN7ANHATOMAN7ANDA S STREETREHAWITATION 5 _ 5 _ H,RMOSAAVL FRDh1 WILSON TO HILLS{D[ ( (STREET REHABILITATION I I = =160000 — I11LL91DFFROM AL TALOMA CHANNEL TO HERMOSA ] ]STREET WIDENING& REHABILITATION _ _ 5 5150030 _ ____ BANYAN FROM VllO HAVEN TO HAVFN ( (STREET WIDENING &REHABILITATION [ °:WD AMETHYST AVE FROM HILLSIDE IO AIMONNp — T TSTRCFT WIDENING& RGHABILITAMN _ _SieO wo WISAMETHYST FROM WO WII SON To 510 HILISIDt S STRFET WIDENING A REHA911ITATION _ _ 5210030 _ _ If( RYL FROM MAN7ANITA 10 S4) HILLSIDC _ WICFNING & RTHA IILITATION - _ISTHEET W STREEiW (l6NING8 PFI{Af11LITAiI- ON S S1 -_(4J J_ S STREET REHABILITATION I %O 1! 1, l AVF F ROM ARROW HIF TGPI RON I _ I S YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVENT PROGRAM - PROJECT COSTS PER YEAR PROJECT NAME 1 f+ 1r T- LINN 1. — 0-AR ,A-t A 1 5-W,-ilTl-il—A&l I_:, A.- i I.-i T; J I 11T ;RA �T A 1 SA,_ I tk:1 NIS V YARLI TO 'I- I LMAN m �-,%l � A T( :I'l A'- F;U.M SWAMI-. ACTIVI 1 Y 92193 93l94 94195 95I96 9U97 i A i., ; i A 7 I At 01 1! A 'i- 4 T FIA-1 I I [A � 1 11 i i 1 IV 4 k: W-!![ 'A.-10N sif i H-Vil. rATION 1 1 i W:Dt 11N.-i & i -t I tAdIt I I A 1.0N lo. TV 1 IIr 3H Euz. � HAR N �TT Va NHN-& H 11 I TAW 1 %'JIV)l A 11 IWIll I I A. I'CM J�M�j T Il JI6 & FILHAFIIHTAT!IIN S., -,.1 t VADI-INING & FIDIABIR RATION- - ---- - - --- , -- - - &,. 2 13Tilr T NFLtNlnCj & W , AHILITATION Sit , V, LULl 7)CK STR F T -.71); 1-146 & !U _'1 RR TATION S ip —s T 1, L K--, 141 F I E7f —Al I Ul I FA 50,11 I S F F —lE F T i—i E H " s 1, i Finc, , CN N 0 BANYAN STREE T Wil); NINI—K AEHA!I!L 11 ATION TOTAL $1.549.000 L4.694.200 51. 173,000 5: 99 /.0.0 S4.034,ut, 20 -YEAR LOCAL MEASURE I TRANSPORATION PLAN The 20 -Year Local Measure I Transportation Plan for the expenditure of Measure I funds will use the City's General Plan Circulation Element as a base. It is anticipated that the funds will be allocated in the following manner: Type of Improvement Percent Maintenance, Rehabilitation 30 and Repair of Existing Roadways Traffic Signal Improvements 10 Street Widenings 20 Intersection Improvements 10 Railroad Crossing Improvements 10 Slurry Seal of Existing Streets 20 (See City's General Plan Circulation Element) -------------- - -- - -- Figure III -3 CIRCULATION PLAN VtlVOSED L ry LOC.LIDM COLLECTOR - - -- -'- SECONDARY ' -' - -- MAJOR ARTERIAL ........ MAJOR DIVIDED ......... ARTERIAL 11111 EXISTING INTERCHANGE O PROPOSED INTERCHANGE FREEWAY INTERCHANGE FMI AT M iMEEW1T. M LOCI ..[LESS I GRADE SEPARATION INTERSECTION FOR POSSIBLE WIDENING ?�? SPECIAL BOULEVARD SPECIAL DESIGN _..i SPECIAL IMPACT STUDY ZONE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA San Bernardino Associated Governments 172 roe'hFaAAr en¢e Srin Bemarordu:in a, C r. /ri,,.p;r. 9]101 1:14;654.8276 F:4R:i714l8h_ -4407 DATE. April 15, 1992 Memo TO: Public Works Directors FROM: Deborah Robinson Barmack Mountain/Desert Program Mar ager SUBJECT: Measure I Five Year Capital Improvement Plans and Twenty Year Transportation Plans Measure I, the countywide transportation sales tax program, requires that each local jurisdiction receiving program revenues annually adopt a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan and a Twenty Year Transportation Plan which outlines the speck projects upon which those funds shall be expended. This information package has been prepared to assist you in your annual review and adoption of those plans. In preparing your annual update, it is suggested that you refer to the Measure I Policies provided to your jurisdiction last November for information related to eligible projects. Additional items are included in this package which will also assist you in this process: Measure I Five and Twenty Year Plan Annual Update Checklist (A r chmew Al Sample Resolution for adoption of the Plans (*w hm w B) Measure I Sales Tax Revenue Estimates for Local Pass- Through (Attachment c) Suggested format for the Five Year Plan (Amchm w D) The projects contained in your five and twenty year plans are not subject to SA.NBAG approval. Plans should contain only those projects which are to be funded by Measure I pass - through revenues which are allocated directly to your jurisdiction. SANBAG is responsible for preparation of similar pLas which will account for projects funded from other program categories. Over - programming of projects is encouraged to allow for slippage and to insure that the adopted plans contain ample projects for Measure I expenditures. Although amendments to the plan can be adopted throughout the year by action of your governing body, over - programming may minimize that necessity. It is requested that your Council/Board adopt the annual plan update by June 15, 1992 and provide a copy of the package to SANBAG for informational purposes. Should you need any assistance, please call Deborah Barmack at (714) 884 -8276. cc: SANBAG Board Members City Managers PWD0406.DRB JN 91505/91504 Cav+ul Adchmw Remmo B,, /lea, W, Ch,,,. Chmn lldtr. Cnlrnn, F W 7. Grand lTrmr r. lfcpr,ra, lkhla,d' lnrno Leal, lfnmrlerr Nrrdlu, Onrarro. Rancho Cucamanpa, Rrdlandn Rialra, Son Rrrnardmo. ],.rm.nmr Pnlmt. Opland, 19rmr. dlr. }'u, arpn T1-w of Appir Valle, t'urza Valle. C'nunrr rf5un Be, - , MEASURE I FIVE AND TWEN -n YEAR PLAN ANNUAL UPDATE CHECKLIST Five Year Capital Imprrovement Program A) This element should consist of a listing of projects which includes the facility/street name, project limits, and description of the improvement. (See suggested format - Attachment D. B) An estimated cost for the project should also be included. (Refer to Attached C to determine estimated Measure I revenues available to your jurisdiction.) C) Mountain/Desert Only - Differentiate between projects which are local (30%), arterial/regional (65 %), and elderly and handicapped transit (5 %). Please note that local funds may be, spent on arterialiregional projects, if so desired. 2. Twenty Year Transportation PI an - This plan necessarily should contain considerable fluidity. The general plan circulation element can serve as a basis for this element. The plans can consist of either. A) A continued list of projects which your jurisdiction anticipates to be completed during the remaining 18 year term of Measure I Program, using the same format as suggested for the Five Year Capital Improvement Program, or B) A narrative policy statement which will guide your jurisdiction in its continued programming of funds for the remaining 18 year term of the Measure I Program. Please note that SANBAG is anticipating approval of several transportation work elements during the next year (Congestion Management Program, Comprehensive Transportation Plan, and identification of the Valley Measure I Arterial System of Roadways) as well as state and federal guidance for programs in the Intermodal Surface Transprotation Efficiency Act. In future years, local jurisdictions will want to consider the impacts of these transportation programs while updating the local Twenty Year Transportation Plans. 3. Place your Five Year Capital Improvement Program and Twenty Year Transportation Plan before your governing board for adoption by resolution. (See Attachment B.) 4. Attach a copy of your jurisdiction's Proposition 111 Maintenance of Effort report. 5. Mail your complete package to San Bernardino Associated Governments, 472 N. Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92401, Attn: Deborah Barmack. ti. If the Five Year Capital Improvement Program is amended by your governing board during the year, send a copy of the Council/Board action to San Bernardino Associated Governments for information purposes. MIPLAN.DRR Measure I Sales Tax Revenue FMin,nd for Local Pass- Through • La.d w aeul .wmuu b rime ayud m{ 51 � -n IFY 9691. •• Fne yae amen ,o b u•ed for derelopmmr e( dm Fo. You Cod Impm - Pba. Pmgd..• W e jmad,edm N Wed w 51 am W 41 nn•6m-Uy. IMRR UT.PIN FY 9 91 FY 91 -92 PY 92- 9319497 lunwiamn P.ctusl Fitunam• Fiimra° VALLEY Chino 461,585 484,661 3,161,627 Chino HUI& 0 114.450 2,239,790 Colroo 314,990 330,740 2,157,524 F..nuut 695,743 730,530 4,765,493 On.d T... 96,017 100,818 657,669 Higlu"d 271,560 285,138 1,SW,051 Loma Lmda 140,627 147,658 963,125 M.ntelav 219,290 230.255 1,502,027 O.tari. 1,032,314 1,083,930 8572,863 Raaelw Caramonga 799,252 839,215 5474,478 Rodlanda 481.59] 505,672 3,298,665 RWtn 577,158 606,016 3,953,2" San 9ortmrdido 1.307,323 1,372,689 8,958,511 Upland 488,021 512,422 3,342,700 Yvuipa 257,882 79,915 1,766563 County- Veiley 1,227,797 1,174,737 6,170.007 MOUNTAIMIDESER7 Reg/At W Loral EBH T.,it CalonWO River Subarea N.edln 203,151 213,309 1591.40 904,464 417,445 69,574 County - Col. River 47,749 50,136 327,057 212,587 98,117 16,353 M...... Bmin Subaru Tweaynlne prima 446,964 469,312 3,061,480 1,989,962 918,4" 153,074 Yucca Volley 0 185,497 3,630,10 2.359.619 1,089,055 181,509 County - M.,."o B". 959,019 821,473 2,938,619 1,910,102 881,586 146,931 NoM Duert Subarea Bern.w 1,109,800 1,165,290 7.601577 4,941,025 2,280,473 380,079 County - No. Duerr 835,739 877526 5,724x95 3,72$857 1.717,319 236,220 Mou,mine Subarea Big Bear Lek. 327,401 343,771 2,242534 1,451,647 672,760 112,127 Codnty- Mountain 913,793 959,483 6,259,026 4,066,367 1,877,708 312,951 Victor Valley Subaru Adelouto 188,299 197,714 1,289,754 838,340 386,926 61,488 Apple Vallcy 995,390 1,045,160 6,817,925 4,431.651 2,045,378 34,696 Hap.,. 1,456.509 1,529.334 9,976560 6,484,634 2,992,908 498,818 Victorville 2,447,136 2,569493 16,761.661 10,895,080 5,028,498 838,083 County - Vicmr Vy. 852,897 895,542 5,841,919 3,797,247 2,004,672 292,096 • La.d w aeul .wmuu b rime ayud m{ 51 � -n IFY 9691. •• Fne yae amen ,o b u•ed for derelopmmr e( dm Fo. You Cod Impm - Pba. Pmgd..• W e jmad,edm N Wed w 51 am W 41 nn•6m-Uy. IMRR UT.PIN CITY OF RANCHO CL'CANTONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager '� FROM: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager /Acting Community Services Director SUBJECT: AMEND REVISED REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 -92 To approve the amended amounts of $701,500 for revenue and. $674,690 for expenses. BACKGRO1RiD Due to increased program participation, in the areas of Youth Sports, Aquatics, Adult Soccer and Classes the Community Services Department must amend the Revised Revenues and Expenditures for Fiscal Year 1991-92. Expenditures require amending because as the revenue rises due to participation so does the expenses for areas such as equipment, supplies, officials and instructors. The accounts should read as follows: FROM TOO 1) Amended Revenue 13- 3901 -7710- Revenue $675,490 $701,500 2) Amended Expenditures 13 -4563- 1300 - Part -Time Salaries 86,580 96,080 13- 4563- 3900 -Mtce. & Operations 131,870 137,570 13- 4563-3960 - General Liability 5,420 6,350 13 -4563- 5900 -Admin /Gen. Overhead 101,320 105,230 13- 4563 -6028- Contract Services 308,060 312,760 13- 4563 - 7043 - Capital Building 8,500 No Change 13 -4563- 7044- Capital Equipment 8 200 No Change Total $649,930 $674.690 Respectfully submitted, 3erry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager /Acting Community Services Director JBF /kls )l� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Ingrid Y. Blair, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE A TOTAI. OF $1,008,000.00 FROM RESERVE FUND (94- 3901 -7901) ($382,690.04) AND REDEMPTION FUND (93- 390 -7905) ($625,309.96) TO THE REDEMPTION FUND (94- 4130 -7920) TO CALL BONDS WITHIN A.D. 82 -1R (6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) AND A TOTAL OF $169,950.00 FROM RESERVE FUND (97- 3901 -7901) ($54,372.85) AND REDEMPTION FUND (96- 3901 -7905) ($115,577.15) TO THE REDEMPTION FUND (96- 4130 -7920) TO CALL BONDS WITHIN A.D. 86 -2 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAINAGE) Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council approve the appropriation of $1,008.000.00 from Reserve Fund (94- 3901 -7901) ($382,690.04) and Redemption Fund (93 -390- 7905) ($625,309.96) to the Redemption Fund (94- 4130 -7920) to call bonds within A.D. 82 -IR (6th Street Industrial District) and a total of $169,950.00 from Reserve Fund (97 -3901 -7901) ($54,372.85) and Redemption Fund (96- 3901 -7905) ($115,577.15) to the Redemption Fund (96- 4130 -7920) to call bonds within A.D. 86 -2 (Rancho Cucamonga Drainage). Background/ naly When the bonds were sold for both Assessment Districts 82 -1R and 86 -2, an Official Statement was prepared for each. In the Official Statement, provision was made for prepayments of assessments that would result in redemption of a portion of the bonds prior to their stated maturities. Due to early payoffs from property owners and interest earned, there are sufficient funds, in reserve to require a bond call. Therefore, the City has exercised this option and informed Bank of America, the Paying Agent, who in turn notified the registered owners of the bonds by registered mail on July 3, 1992, that bonds would be called. CPPY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE A TOTAL OF $1,008,000.00 July 15, 1992 Page 2 Additionally, the Notices of Redemption were published by the City in The Valley Daily Bulletin on July 2nd and 3rd, 1992. These notifications met the criteria of 60 days prior notice to the redemption date of September 2, 1992. Respecriully su r Hart Administrative Services Director JH:IYB:de M, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Judy 15, 1992 - af `- TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Ingrid Y. Blair, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR THE COLLECTION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE AUDITOR/CONTROLLER- RECORDER, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Staff recommends that City Council approve the contract for the collection of special assessments between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Auditor /Controller- Recorder, County of San Bernardino. Section 29304 of the California Government Code requires that whenever any special charges or assessments are to be collected by the County, an amount agreed upon by the City and the County shah be added to the special charges or assessments. The attached contract allows an amount not to exceed $2.00 to be levied by the County per parcel. Currently, the amount added to each parcel by the County is $0.25 and there has been no indication to staff that the amount will increase. The reason for the $0.25 charge is the City provides the information to the County on magnetic tape. If the information were not provided on magnetic tape the charge would be approximately $1.00. Respectfully submitted, /art Administrative Services Director JH:IYB:de Attachments: Contract C9NTRACT FOR T11E CO[.T,ECTION OF SPECIAL ASSF_CSMEITS The County of San Bernardino shall collect special assessments for the under - signed: The following charges shall be made for the collection of special assessments or assessments or special assessment taxes: (a) Assessments for any district, special district zone or improvement district thereof, not to exceed $2.00 for each parcel bearing such an assessment. (b) Special assessment or special assessment taxes levied upon any land or real property by any city, county, district or other public corporation, officer or body, not to exceed $2.00 for each parcel bearing such an assessment. (c) Pursuant to Government Code Section 29304, such charge shall be added to the amount of the assessment for each parcel bearing such an assessment. 2. This contract may be terminated for any ensuing fiscal year prior to June 1, or the preceding fiscal year by giving ten days notice in writing to the other party. A!Icst COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ESarlene Sproat Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chairman Board of Supervisors By: Dated Dated: Attest: Agency: By: By: (Title) _ (Title) Dated: Dated: _ cl 6/91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director BY: Sandy Ramirez. Resource Services Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE WITH NBI INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $15.470; PRIME COMPUTER IN THE AMOUNT OF $36.100 AND WESTEK COMPUTER SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 47,100; TO BE FUNDED FROM CONTRACT SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 01 -4159 -6028 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 Staff recommends City Council's approval to execute contracts for computer hardware and software maintenance with NBI Inc., in the amount of $15.470; Prime Computer in the amount of $36.100 and Westek Computer Services in the amount of $ 47,100. The total amount of $98.670 will be funded from contract services account number 01- 4159 -6028 for Fiscal Year 1992/93. The computer equipment located throughout the City requires periodic maintenance and repair. NBI Inc.. Prime Computer and Westek Computer Services provide these services on some of the hardware and software throughout the various departments. Additionally, staff will execute existing contracts for hardware that are within staffs purchasing authority dollar limits and do not require City Council action. These pieces of equipment /software are essential for the support of Management. Information Systems, Geographical Information Systems, Mapping, Word Processing and personal computers within the City. Re -esp ctfully� submitted. Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JII:SRjmf CITY OF RANCHO COCA \IONGA STAFF REPORT ^ DATE: July 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, INC. FOR SOFTWARE UPDATES AND TRAINING OF CITY STAFF TO UPDATE CITY'S PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR ALL THE STREETS WITHIN THE CITY. THE COST OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, INC. SERVICES IS $15,730 ($14,300 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) AND WILL BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 32- 4637 -9110. RECOM1ENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Pavement Management System, Inc., and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND /AKAI-YSI S In 1986 an inventory was taken of all existing streets listing the conditions of each street. The pavement management system was not adequately updated over the past six years, mainly because it was not computerized in 1986. Also, many new streets have been constructed since that time and these need to be put on a computerized system. Pavement Management System, Inc., has submitted a proposal for software updates and training of City staff to update City's pavement management system for all the streets within the City, which includes a complete inventory of the curbs, gutters, sidewalks and paved streets. This program will define the pavement maintenance needs and provide the necessary tools for budgeting purposes. Once the entire system has been computerized, minimal time and expenses will be required to maintain the system. Pavement Management System,. Inc., will perform the fallowing: provide the required software needed for City staff to perform the field review; provide on -site personnel training in data collection and pavement condition assessment techniques; provide quality control checks; convert the field data to the Pavement Management System's software and train City personnel on use of the software. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, INC. July 15, 1992 Page 2 The proposed contract fee of $15,730.00 is to be funded f,om weasure I. Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's -office. This project is included in this years Capital Improvement Program. Respectfully submitted, n C William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JS:ly Attachment z1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA:VIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II= — ��F._ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13664, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE NORTH OF CHURCH STREET RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 13664 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $14,000, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $140,000. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Tract 13664 - located on the east side of Haven Avenue north of Church Street Accept: Release: DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 67D Upland, CA 91786 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 14,000 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $140,000 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG :sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. gip' 214 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13664 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13664 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engireer, is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 23 CYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 15, 1992 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: RELEASE OF LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND FOR OR 90 -05, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HELLMAN AVENUE AND 9TH STREET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Labor and Materials Bond for DR 90- 05,located on the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and 9th Street, Department of Motor Vehicles. Per previous City Council action, the subject improvements were accepted and a Notice of Completion was filed. The required time has passed, and no claims have been filed or received by the City Clerks Office. Therefore, it is recommended that Council release the Labor and Materials Bond. Release: DEVELOPER: Russell Jeter 935 Vista de Lejos Drive Santa Barbara, CA 93110 Labor and Materials Bond (Street) $165,000 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil'✓ City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 15, 1992 TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: qt Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector - _ RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 12671 - TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD RECOMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the signal imprsvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Release: DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Maintenance Guarantee Bond $10,000. Respectfully submit William J. O'Neil City Engineer WOO: SMG:ly s CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT y DATE: July 15, 1992 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council II.LJ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13444, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FAIRMONT WAY ANO MILLIKEN AVENUE RECOMNDN/ATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Release: DEVELOPER: William Lyon Company 4490 Von Karman Newport Beach, CA 92660 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $50,612 Respectfully submitted, ^ William J. O'Neil U City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd CITY OF RANCHO CL'CANIONC.2 STAFF REPORT � DATE: July 15, 1992 C ' 1 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II- SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF BANYAN STREET AND MILLIKEN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND PARKWAY AND MEDIAN LANDSCAPING AND MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN, TRACTS 13748, 13857 AND 13858, AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION. ALSO, ACCEPTANCE OF SUBSTITUTION BONDS FOR INTERIOR TRACT IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF EXISTING BONDS FOR TRACTS 13748, 13957 AND 13858, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET. It is recommended that City Council accept the Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue Street Improvements, parkway and median landscaping and the master planned storm drain into the City's maintained system, Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. It is also recommended that City Council accept substitution of Improvement Agreement and Bonds for the remaining improvements (interior tract street improvements), Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858. The Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue Street Improvements and parkway and median landscaping and master planned storm drain have been completed and are acceptable to the City Engineer. The landscaped areas are within a maintenance district and the assessments are in place. Therefore, it is recommended that the improvements be accepted at this time. Brock Homes, Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, has four performance bonds in place; one bond each for each individual tract and one bond for Banyan Street, Milliken Avenue, landscaping and storm drain for all three tracts. After approval of the tracts and acceptance of the bonds, Brock transferred Tract 13148 to Griffin Homes. Upon completion of Banyan Street, Milliken Avenue, landscaping and storm drain, Brock has requested the acceptance of those improvements and the release of bonds for those improvements. Brock has also requested the remaining improvements for Tract 13748 be bonded by Griffin Homes. Staff has no objections to the release of the Banyan Street, Milliken Avenue, etc. bond or to the Griffin bond substitution. However, there appears to be some overlapping of the existing bonds. Therefore, in consideration of the recomnendatino, although the interior tract improvements are 70% complete, staff asked that the interior tract improvements be 100% bonded using current cost estimates. Brock Homes and Griffin Homes have agreed to the above and CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT BANYAN ST. 8 MILLIKEN AVE. STREET IMPROVEMENTS July 15, 1992 Page 2 have furnished new bonds for all three tracts. If Council approves this recommendation, the following summarizes the action: Release: Faithful Performance Bond Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13748 (Interior tract improvements - Griffin Homes) S 106,000 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13857 - Tract 13858 $ 94,000 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) - Tracts 13748, 13857, 13858 Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13858 E 98,000 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) Faithful Performance Bond - Tracts 13748, 13857, 13858 $1,093,000 (Infrastructure - Brock Homes) 3380 Shelby Street, Suite 100 Accept: Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13748 $ 344,000 (Interior tract improvements - Griffin Homes) Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13857 $ 228,466 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) Faithful Performance Bond - Tract 13858 $ 262,739 (Interior tract improvements - Brock Homes) Maintenance Guarantee Bond - Tracts 13748, 13857, 13858 $ 150,240 (Milliken, Banyan, Landscaping, Storm Drain - Brock Homes) Developer: Tracts 13857 d 13858 Brock Homes 3380 Shelby Street, Suite 100 Ontario, CA 91764 Tract 13748 Griffin Homes 685 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 100 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. G/j A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MILL IKEN AVENUE, BANYAN STREET, AND THE LANDSCAPING AND STORM DRAIN ASSOCIATED WITH TRACTS 13748, 13857 AND 13858 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Milliken Avenue, Banyan Street, and the landscaping and storm drain associated with Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. Z� CITY OF RANCHO CtiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 15, 1992 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT; CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 91 -15 - -MONARCH FOODS - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to require the addition of tiles to the dome element for Shakey's restaurant, located in the Terra Vista Town Center - APN: 1077- 421 -76. RKC00CINDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission's decision and deny the appeal. BACRDRDUND: On April 8, 1992, the Planning Commission approved Shakey's Restaurant. The building design included a dome proposed by the project architect. One of the conditions of approval required that the final design and materials of the dome be subject to Design Review Committee approval prior to the issuance of building permits. On May 21, 1992, the Committee (McNiel, Chitiea, Kroutil) reviewed the dome design, as conceptually approved by the Commission, and also a new scheme consisting of a hip -roof tower design, now preferred by the applicant. The Committee felt the already approved dome design was superior to the new hip -roof tower. However, the two Commissioners did not agree on whether the dome material should be plaster as originally proposed or ceramic tile similar to the two existing domes in the center. The matter was returned to the full Commission for selection of an alternative. On May 27, 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed all three alternatives and approved the dome with ceramic tiles by a 7 -2 vote. Copies of the May 27, 1992, Planning Commission minutes and staff report are attached for your reference. CONCIt1SION: There are three basic alternatives available: A dome with a the finish, as approved by the Planning Commission. A dome with a plaster finish, as originally submitted. A hip -roof element, as now preferred by the applicant. D CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 91 -15 - MONARCH FOODS, INC. July 15, 1992 Page 2 Staff has prepared two resolutions. The first resolution upholds the Planning Commission's decision to require ceramic tiles on the dome and the second resolution upholds the appeal, reversing the Commission's decision. Respe submit d, i Brad R ler City Tanner BB:NF:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Appeal Letter from the Applicant Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report of May 27, 1992 Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevation - Dome Design Exhibit "E" - Elevation - Hip Roof Design Resolution of Approval Upholding Planning Commission's Decision Resolution of Approval Upholding the Appeal 31 �d SHAhEY "S INCORPORATED G.i�! �• SKAKEY'S INTERNATI05.AL LLmITED (l whe Z. JUN 4 1992 c, vaWa June 1, 1392 Clerk of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 -0807 RE: Terra vista Town Center Protect DR 91 -15 Dear Clerk: Monarch Foods, Inc., requests to be included in the upcoming city council agenda. The reason for our request for inclusion is to appeal planning commission's decision of May 27, 1992 as it relates to design issues for project DR 91 -15. LPlease advise at your earliest convenience of the date and time scFle�uMe for our planning commission appeal. Also please advise if any drawings or graphic material would be required in addition to the materials already at the city. Sincerely yours, Timothy Z. Harrison TZH /omm COMMMTG.61 <;c: File yy'l�gr� 3Z 651 Gateway Blvd., Suite 1200. South San Francisco. CA 9.1080 -7015 CSA Tel: 11151 873.0640 Fax: (315 ) 737-2191 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTO�LETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried 210 SVSINESS E. OE=OPMENT REVIEW 91-15 O EDOD - Selection of the roof element for Shakey's Restaurant, located in the Terra Vista Town Center - APN: 1077 - 421 -76. Chairman McNiel seated that the Design Review Committee members had decided that the full Commission should review the tower element. Ccmm ies toner Chitisa reported that Chairman McNial preferred the dome element and she agreed that would be acceptable but ens felt straight plaster may look unfinished as there are no other plaster domes in the center. She Indicated she would prefer some other design but she did not feel it needed to be as ornate as the other domes in the center. She thought tile was needed to complete the tower. Chairman McNiel stated be preferred a dome instead of the hip roof proposed by the developer. He felt the dome should not be as ornate as the balance of the center. He observed that plaster domes have been approved in the past and he felt one would work well with the architecture. Ccmmiseioner Neither felt the applicant had submitted a good design but some cf the Commissioners may be reluctant to approve it because they felt it may not hold up. He suggested that the Commission approve the plaster dome with a requirement that tile be added later if the dome did not appear to weather well. He felt the diversity in the center merits a different dome. Commissioner Chitisa thought it would be difficult to add the in the future. Brad Buller, City Planner, thought it may be possible to condition the project to add tile at a later time, but he stated that would not be a preferable course of action. Chairman McNial stated he did not want the dome to detract from the center. Notion: Moved by Chitisa, seconded by Toletoy, to require a dome element with ceramic tilss with the design to be approved by the Design Review Committee. motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried Planning Commission Minute -3- May 27, 1992 �d718�T � 1 33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ..ATE: nay 27, 1992 .C: Chairman And Members of the Planning Commission ;ROM: 3rad Buller, City Planner By: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 91 -15 - MONARCH FOODS - Selection of the roof a le ment for Shak ey 's Restaurant, located Ln the Terra Vista Town Center - APN: 1077- 421 -76. BACKGROUND: Shakey's Restaurant was approved by the Planning Commission on April 9, 1992. One of the conditions of approval recraires that the final design of the dome and the element on top of it shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. On May 21, 1992, the Committee (MCNie L, Chitiea, Kroutil) reviewed the dome design as conceptually approved by the Commission and a new scheme consisting of a hip roof tower design. The Committee felt that the dome design would add an interest to the building more than the hip roof tower design. However, the Committee could not reach a consensus on whether the dome should remain plastered or should have ceramic tiles added and referred the matter to the full Commission for selection of an alternative. ANALYSIS: There are three alternatives for the Commission to consider, they are is fol'..S: I. Dome to remain plastered with a ball element on top as origially approved on April S, 1992. 2. Add ceramic tiles to the dome. The color of the tiles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. (It should be noted that the developer is opposed to this alternative.) 3. Approve the hip roof tower design as submitted. RECCMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission choose one of the aLternatives as outlined above Roy ily Bra er City P armor SB:NF /Ifs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site plan Fxh;bit "B" - Elevations - Dome Design Fxh Lbit "C' - Elevatrnn Hip Roof Tower Design �. ql- - 2�4 ®rf I I trl lr, W . -..... ... n - z i 3S w ls� .W V l , MY OF y. ION UCAMONGA PI..AN _rQ_`�. T)o M� `DF�s /e;7 P\l ►fi9� = = 3a CIS) 'fly M✓ IY�1 T. NIP P�src�r�j� ITEM: TrrLE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: 5. SCALE: RESOLUTICN NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE APPEAL AND REVERSING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO REQUIRE CERAMIC TILE FOR THE DOME ELEMENT FOR SHAKEY'S RESTAURANT (DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 91 -15), LOCATED IN THE TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077- 421 -7E A. Recitals. (i) Monarch Foods, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of the done design for Development Reviaw No. 91 -15 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as the "application." ;ii) On May 27, 1992, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the request to review the final design of the dome, and following the conclusion of said public hearing, approved the dome with ceramic tiles. (iii) The decision represented by said Planning Commission's action was timely appealed to this Council. (iv) On July 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. fl. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced hearing on July 15, 1992, including written and Oral staff reports and the minutes of the above - referenced Planning Commission meetinn, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: !a) The application applies to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue, on property zoned Community 7ommercial and is cuvently vacant; and (b) The properties to the north and west of the subject site are shopping centers, the property to the south is developed with a restaurant and the remaining area is vacant., and the property to the east is vacant; and `. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DR 91 -15 - MONARCH FOODS, INC. July 15, 1992 Page 2 (c) The proposed project is consistent with the Terra Vista Towr. Center Master Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The proposed plaster dome with the ball element is consistent with the architectural theme of the Terra Vista Town Center. 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby upholds the appeal, subject to the following conditions: (a) All conditions of the approval, as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 92 -67 including the Standard Conditions, shall apply, except fnr Condition No. 1. (b) The dome shall be smooth plastered. The final details and color of the dome shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Monarch Foods, Inc., that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is mverned by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return- receipt requested, to Monarch Foods, Inc., at the address identified in City records. RESOLD -ION NO. "a'1, ) r 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO REQUIRE CERAMIC TILE FOR THE DOME ELEMENT FOR SHAF2Y1S RESTAURANT (DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 91 -15), LOCATED IN THE TERRA VISTA TOW CENTER, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077- 421 -76 A. Recitals. (i) Monarch Foods, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of the dome design for Development Review No. 91 -15 as described in the title of ants Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as the "application." (ii) On May 27, 1992, the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing or. the request to review the final design of the dome, and following the conclusion of said public hearing, approved the dome with ceramic tiles. (iii) The decision represented by said Planning Commission's action ,was timely appealed to this Council. (iv) On July 15, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (v) All Legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. -his Council hereby specifically finds that all of the farts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced hearing on July 15, 1992, including written and oral staff reports end the minutes of the above - referenced Planning Commission meeting, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue, on property zoned Community Commercial and is currently vacant; and (b) The properties to the north and west of the subject site ate .shopping centers, the property to the south is developed with a res Z.aurant and the remaining area is vacant, and the property to the east is vacant; and 4-0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DR 91 -15 - MONARCH FOODS, INC. July 15, 1992 Page 2 (c) The proposed project is not consistent with the Terra Vista Town Center Masts, Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The proposed plaster dome with the ball element is not consistent with the architectural theme of the Terra Vista Town Center. 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies the appeal, subject to the following conditions: (a) All conditions of the approval, as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 92 -67 including the Standard Conditions, shall apply. (b) The dome shall have ceramic tiles. The final design shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Monarch Foods, Inc., that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return - receipt requested, to Monarch Foods, Inc., at. the address identified in City records. DECLAMATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA JAN SUTTON states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at all times mentioned herein have been, the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on -f:�-IAJ. `jc 14 `3 at //: (3� 6M I posted a true and correct copy of the meeting agenda dated at 10500 civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on _I, V.! .So /' J y J at Rancho Cucamonga. DEBRA J. ADAMS, CMC, CITY CLERK City of Rancho Cucamonga By: r -- Jan Sutton, Deputy city clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. August 5, 1992 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ..s Board Members Dennis L. Stout William J. Alexander Charles J. Buquet Diane Williams Pamela J. Wright •s• Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, Attorney Debra J. Adams, Secretary City Office: 989 -1851 Fire Protection District Agenda PAGE August 5, 1942 1 All Items submitted for the Fire District Board Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Roll Coll: Buquet_, Alexandar_,Stoul_, Wiillanu _, and Wright _ B. ANNOUNC MFNTSLEBESFNTATIQNC C. COMM NI .sTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This Is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire District Board. State law prohibits the Board from addressing any Issue not previnusiy Included on the Agenda. The Board may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire District Board at one time without discussion. Any Item may be removed by a Boardmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 1 June 30. 1992. 2. Approval of Modification of Resolution No. 1 -10-77 relating to 4 Administrative Reporting and Responsibilities. PAGE Fire Protection District Agenda August 5, 1992 2 RESOLUTION NO. FD 92 -019 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 1 -10 -77 OF THE FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, REGARDING ADMINISTRAP.VE REPORTING AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO PERSONNEL RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE FIRE DISTRICT 3. Approval of Compensation Resolution for Fiscal Year 1992/93. .., RESOLUTION NO, FD 92-020 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. FD 91 -011 AND NO, FD 91 -011A IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 4. Approval of Annual Fee Schedule. 22 RESOLUTION NO FD 91 -018-A 23 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91 -018 TO CLARIFY PERMIT ISSUANCE E IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for Fire District Board to identify the Items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only Identified for the next meeting. F. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTERS. I, Debra J. Adams. City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurat3 copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 30, 1992, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the meeting par Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. _���_ _ _ _ _ ! xEtr llr !Wr Ix1i M49Al I[MA: Ft1 ^f IrEL'IS Ml 4r 5IR lC: Po0.E0 rfi[SIYEXIS 1:! W: M4 LORi95 YI:x pfYyliFY 9r4IE 9fW11Fp INESIRYI F0.1[IEi. =V[ IM51RX1 =1[Yypf'A rpp�}ai Rpfp 51g114PoVI ft911FI:[I FRI [k'x l!p LIW I01l'r 10 RfI rtIr RY1M 7/6�� IslMrfn rlrwlrwfs. =IE lW1EC11M1 XI�.91ir xP.N =IF 151110 tlil E9 ititlpr )FMf '9.:191 'FACN1 Of MPASE bF IG :el Y5 rluw iiREYrt 41'J 4ir 9F rO1:r9L la IF F1 wl�F l'r .pll talE Yi fW IVM rY! a[t. Fn.r it �etlYm: =near ..... ........ i :.tlB1.r39.11 91.91 S. NS Silt 2".0 S.W IIAI 1 I :.NS '..!J •]r rr :WF S'F Y:S n.e ]Vf iaE F S ..............1 :•:la M.I1 Iq.Anl 1 1 S. MII S. Ipi{ X '. wIE FXYe. '11LX F:ffM I� x5. 31rE! :) 1EW 104r; rFN P011K -n �. err 1 It SM1I.;J 1 i01 �E31 ]0 1 .91 5:I.If _���_ _ _ _ _ ! xEtr llr !Wr Ix1i M49Al I[MA: Ft1 ^f IrEL'IS Ml 4r 5IR lC: Po0.E0 rfi[SIYEXIS 1:! W: M4 LORi95 YI:x pfYyliFY 9r4IE 9fW11Fp INESIRYI F0.1[IEi. =V[ IM51RX1 =1[Yypf'A rpp�}ai Rpfp 51g114PoVI ft911FI:[I FRI [k'x l!p LIW I01l'r 10 RfI rtIr RY1M 7/6�� IslMrfn rlrwlrwfs. r le re: . nre rw mall elsnm a - .r. , na .rra:o xwus - uuEVhns •nc rc nn m, '.Rhi *6� uPi! IMF, iil Yi!IR'Ir 9P11 6nCe 'Si.Fi „ ALE iy! Mtlt MH YOLK t r� 'a5 9ifF '4111 Y.4 IiEC• :R[. rEYr :vMf t. 01 .•1M: R.Y: :, 2p: W.Y]'.19�% %.r' S:1'r t�05 i.119 I •filBlfl ' -E�il6 v((y'Yr5 ,, -Y ! !Vlll "I IlFW5 1 2.i15.11`l I,:l!•dR.11 t.111fl5,lr .M]: ViY. m 1119 v—, apIECt19Y ilifll[t - i Viln INii1MR 411VIIY 9' ,rff vl aF :'lE I. laat IIYE IV. IVat ' ii ) IMYSA('Id oyp[yASEi SPtESI V'•; Il lEi '� :.•.ES ^Ea- 1 .,,.. a • 9nE rc oEaa lrs Iw Yllxonws IYKKE LPL# le'E C''INS sYl dJS MIIY16111IKE'. Ir34•70X ePi51C[� nE"..IR A[bIIV(S fE61i 11E EMKKF'. -W I. iAM Y vF. ✓IC) i.RJ I.o.a R.ul N1. Y10 M SI 11 }. JI IC145 RS I... 3P19KE: 11.3�M•I"." al:a M} 3.111•NI.M 7, I", 191.1a RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT DATE: .August 5, 1992 TO: President and Members of the Board Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MODIFICATION OF RESOLUTION 1- 10 -77, RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTING AND RESPONSIBILITIES RECDNNENDATION The Fire Board adopt the attached resolution, BACKGROUND In July 1989, when the City of Rancho Cucamonga assumed responsibility for the Foothill Fire Protection District, the administrative reporting and responsibilities changed due to the structure of the city organization. The Fire Chief previously had reported directly to the Board of Directors, and with the City assuming responsibility the Fire Chief reports to the City Manager who is responsible to the Fire Board. The attached resolution modifies the Fire District personnel rules to clarify those reporting responsibilities that were developed when the Fire District became part of the City. The recommended action is purely "clean up ". Respec ully mi , Jim Hart Administrative Services Director JH /rs attachment RESOLUTION NO. FD 92- C 'q .A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 1- 10 -77, OF THE FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTING AND RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO PERSONNEL RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE FIRE DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga assumed responsibility for the Fire District in July 1989, and WHEREAS, the administrative reporting and responsibilities changed as a reso it of assuming the Fire District, and WHEREAS, clarification of administrative reporting and responsibilities are necessary `or efficient and effective operations of the Fire District, I THEREFORE, the following sections of resolution 1 -10 -77 are amended to read as follows: Rulc I, SECTION 4. Appointing Authority- The City Manager or his /her designee. Rule i, SECTION 7, Board- The Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protect'on District. Rule 1, SECTION 21. Fire Chief- The. Chief Administrator of the Fire Department, who shall be responsible to and report to the City Manager of the City of Pancho Cucamonga. Rule 1, SECTION 28. Personnel Officer- The City Manager or anyone he /she may appoint to act in his behalf on personnel matters. Rule 1I, SECTION IA. Personnel Officer- The City Manager may delegate all or part of his power and duties as Personnel Officer, as provided in Section 3 of the Personnel Ordinance. The position of Personnel Officer may be combined with any other position in the City or district, provided that the qualifications set forth in Section 3 of the Personnel Ordinance are met, Rule Ii, SECTION ID. Personnel Officer- The duties and responsibilities OF oersonr,el Officer may be delegated entirely to another employee who is qualified to issumn those responsibilities, as determined by the City Manager. Rule VIII, SE 1^T10N IA. Vacancies- When a vacancy occurs, the Personnel Officer may fill the vacancy and provide such information as is required to the appointing authority. Palle It, SECTION 3A. Performance Reports- Within ten (10) days prior to the completion of every three 3 months during the probationary period, the Fire Chief or company officer shall furnish the Personnel Officer with a report as to the progress and Capability of the probationary employee, a copy of which shall also be furnished to the probationer and placed in his /her ?ersonnel file. Resolution No. Page 2 Rule XIII, SECTION 3A. La voff- The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the City Manager, may lay off permanent and probationary wor %ers at any time for lack of work or other changes that have taken place. The employee and the employee's organization are to be given thirty (30) days notice before such a layoff is to take place. The District shall meet and consult with the concerned employee organization on such matters as the timing Of the layoff and the number and identity of the employees affected by the layoff during the 30 day period prior to the proper layoff action. CIQ City Manager rr hie /her designee. ..ect_on Y. n,utcintinc Atli P.ority - L n Esf- -B-1- r ?CIOr'R-°.i+ttRE- 'hie- '%,r,MEi�-�p-� ]if- i}F33fTd?2v'i- =r t2�di- a{. }pFT- E2- i'J.t�f 2- 3f:-- daUfi} AiSiC+Rf-- :,-0 -a'LS W-- �OS =��:.T Sect, cr. _. Amp ointment - the act of illina a vacant with an indivi d.:al who ias r,_- the ;-uai_...^a— ins for that position. Section 6. n.pncintment Date - the or iyinal date of used to compute vacation, sick leave and reriraner.: benefits. Rancho Cucamonga Section 7. Board - the Board of Dire,-tors of `_he -i'oothrl9 F -r_ Protection District. Section 9. Class or Class of Positions - all oositicns :r. _.._ District service havinq d.ities and res::onsibi:ities sufficiently similar so that the same requirenant= as to education, experience, knowledge and abilit, may be demanded of incurbvnts, and so tha: tn-- sere schedule of ccmcensation nay be made to app L; '..-tr. equity to all. Section 9. Comoensation - salary, wane allowance, and all ot: .-.ar forms of valuable considec'ation earned by or -arc cc any employee by reason of service in any position, but does not include expenses authorized and '.._..-___ as incidents to employment. Section 10. Compensatory Time - time off work, which may L_ accrued, granted to an administrative or manacemen._ employee. Section 11. Continuous Service - regular service in the ernle' -' of the District without a break or interruotccn. Section 12. Demotion - the movement of an employee from ece class to another class having a lower maximur rata of nay. Section 1.3, Deoartment Head - the head of an established ,ffi x or department havinq supervision c` such depariren. or office. _e --ion ^_.^,. Lxec•ut -, e = sc. ^._e. .ho ._re Chief. Section :1. Fire Chief - the chief ao.- inistrator of the 'ire who shall be responsible to and report to the departr.ent, 9. x=- EFea- t- tAdi- ,t�dttab- dyt}u- auL'aer3xed -.Lo City Manager of the City Rancho Cucamiga. m _of aes- 3- r3- gas- beiTab € -3�aesc+ase . Section 22. c:c IiCvV :a:' - the compensation received h';, em.o' -oyces -or wo- liin.- on a legal, hc)Sda'y. Section 23. Immediate Family - spouse, children, stepchildren, parents, brother, sister, grandfather, grandmother, grandchild, any the emolovee's mother -in -lap: or father- in -la;,. �...,ticn 24. La',yoff - t:-.e leaving of ni.strict service by a full time orplo:'ee doe to reor.{anization, shortage of work, lack of f...n.ds, or other curtailment o` public service activity. Names of such persons may he placed on the reinstatement list, provided their past service has been sat is factor,:. Section 25. Manacement Personnel - any employee having been granted the authority to exercise independent judge- ment, initiate recall, assign personnel functions or responsibilities, discipline other employees and assume the duties of the Fire Chief when required. Section 26. Minimum Qualifications - those qualifications re- quired for a position as set forth in the Class Specifications and Salary Resolution. Section 27. Overtire - that time worked in excess of the normal work period, compensated at the employee's regular hourly rate, for which compensatory time or adminis- rative leave has not been granted. Manager 23, Personnel Cfficer - the lit fY- e-lr or anyone he /rav appoint to act in his behalf on personnel matters. 29. Probationary Period - a working test period during which an emolovee is required to demonstrate his capability for the duties of the rosition to which he is aopo-,nted by actual performance. Section 30. P'^ ^:oticn - the no•:e ^.e. . cr. c..._ '. from ..::e class to another class ha' ^nc a higher maxim_-. rate of , ay. Section __. Reallocation - a chance ... elloca_ ion ,f an ln.!ivldual pos:-ion ley raisino it to a :'._.:'nor class, lo•werinc ..- -o a lcwer class, mo:•i:•.a it 'o ,.::-.er class a- _he same level. z_ction 32. Reinstatement - the restoration of an cmolovee to a previous position after a layoff, sick 'leave, or suspension. Section 33. Seniority - the length of .full time continuous service with the District and then within a ocsit;.cn classification covered by these rule. Section 34. Suspension - a temporary removal frori duty o` an employee, without pay, for disciplinary reasons. Section 35. Termination - the leaving of District service by an employee due to death, discharee, layoff, resic- nation, retirement, or work completion. II. AD5IIN IST RATION Section 1. Personnel Officer pity manager A. The Fii- e- e+rre€ may delegate all or part of his power and duties as Personnel Officer, as pro- vided in Section 3 of the ?ersennel Ordinance. The position of Personnel Officer may be combined City or with any other position in the nistrrct, provided that the qualifications set forth in section 3 of the Personnel Ordinance are met. 'o. The duties and responsibilities of Personnel Officer may be assihv.W'entirely wino is qualified to r_rrt i- rig -by another employee d^si•gnated -�-P2- assume eh4se responsibilities, as determined 4 the �o: me -i- -OYfi-eer,--entrre-iy--b} --art- :7rCZ »sl - -er City Manager. agene� �t# t- Ir- w#ri- �k- t- Me- �sEr- i- a6 -eoaE- rue €fr - €er ihalr -.r gas£ oamassicev-- os- sask- rk+Cir.�- arKi- rascors:: - ei -bt e des- tna} -be- -d i+riA e�- amor..g- ar*',`- eorv2+4ftaE a� -s= E+Te- €ofiega -rr•H= tor. rez- a .._._tc^. stave. ^.,eat the ap^._icant declining apcoint- -ant cr $-ac_n7, =cat he w'si:es ..4S name removed fro -. the employment list. 's) the aucli cant has been rejected _or any reason as se_ '_orth in Rule v, Section 2. Section 4. ?.'.'all abii. �tv of Eiicicles a. _t shall he the rssnonsibility of elicible acplicants to not -'_y the appointinc, authority, in writing, of chance of address or other chance affectinc availability for appointment. P:;LE 'Jlz 7 .. rPPO:'T "EN- section 1. Vacancies a. Wher. a vacancy occurs, the Personnel Officer may fill the vacancy and provide such information as is required to the accointina authority. Section 2. Z_Iicibility Lists a. Priority for consideration for employment shall be given to the various employment lists in the following order: Re- employment lists and lists established by competitive examinations. b. -he re- employment list for any position shall consist of the names of permanent employees who have been laid off for lack of work or lack of funds from a position in the same class or an equivalent class to that in which the vacancy exists. Such names shall. be placed on the re- employment list in reverse order of layoff. Employees whose positions have been reallocated to a lower class but who have not been demoted `_or cause shall a'_so have their naves placed on RULE X. LEAVES OF ABSENCE Section I. Holidays a. Holidays are those days which the District designates as observed holidays for the .. _cer shall notufy the appointing aut.grit, of such Contemnlaned extension oC the basic probationary Period. a__tton 3. -fcrmance Reports ten (10) logs r.rior to tine completion cf e','ery three ,L months durin.: the proba- the Fire Chief or t_onary period, Perspnnel company officer s:na'_i furnish the gnpc- n:irc} officer �et+8-4-t- with a report as to the progress end, capability of the prebatlonary employee, a copy of wta ch shall o!so be furnished to the Probationer. and placed in his /her personnel file. b. 1: reconnendation is -.ade for r,alection of the probationer b-Y the appointing authority, he shall furnish a written report of his reasons for said action to the appointing ac*_horit% C. .A new employee may be terminated by the appointing authority. c.. An employee serving a probationary period after a promotion may be returned to his former position if the appointing authority `eels he is incapable of fulfilling his new duties within the period of probation. e. Upon successful completion of the probationary period, an employee shall be considered for Permanent status. RULE X. LEAVES OF ABSENCE Section I. Holidays a. Holidays are those days which the District designates as observed holidays for the officer stall f.'rwlrJ res, 7nat ano cer-nrman, e e,.,a1uat_4 .n repnrt to tne appornt- a'1­ir:tv. -ail�re ]n the �art 7,f toe .nose S�na__ -.2 aIeninl 7 rcinstataoe..t 3 '_avof f Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the City Manager, a. The may !a%- an„ probat-,C..- ary wcr:;ers at any tire for lack ::or:; or other chances that ha',­ ta'r.en clace. The =nm ovee and the emplc-..ee' a grqnnizal ion aic. to :)e clven thirty (30) days notice before such a lavrff 4 s to take place. -he --istrict stall meet and con=sult with the concerned employee organization on 5jch matters as the timing p, layoff and the number and identity of the employees affected b- I' - I, the lay- off during the 30 day period prior D the proper layoff action. b. A demotion or transfer to another cLasai_`caticn may be made to prevent a layoff, Provide4 the employee is qualified by education andlcr­ experi- ence and demonstrates by successful completion of a a,_,ali4ying examination that he/she is capable of performing the duties of the classification. C. In the event of a layoff, those employees with the least service in the classification affected shall be laid off first; if a recall begins, the most senior employees laid off in the classifi- cation required shall ':)a recalled first. Strict application of seniority shall prevail unless exceptional circumstances occur of which 'he concerned employee organization shall be fully apprised in advance. The order of lavo`_f shall be; (J) Temporary employees in the classification shall be removed first. (2) ?-Qlationary employees in -7e affected classification shall he removed next. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICC STAFF REPORT DATE: August 5, 1992 T0: President and Members of the Board Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF COMPENSATION RESOLUTION FOR FY 92/93 RECOMMENDATION The Fire Board adopt the attached resolution. BACKGROUND Meet and confer with the Fire Support Association has concluded with the following changes: 1. Modification of the holiday schedule to coincide with the City's. The total number of holidays does not change, however, the Fire District will no longer observe Lincoln's Birthday, Admissions Day and Columbus Day. Those become floating holidays to be used at the employees discretion, with supervisory approval, during the year. Because the Fire Safety Division is located in the City Hall facility, by observing holidays when the facility is open to the public because City employees do not observe Lincoln's Birthday, Admissions Day or Columbus Day, would not allow for complete coverage of services to the public. This modification allows complete employee coverage on all the days the City Hall facility is open. 2. Inclusion of personal leave time, up to 20 hours per fiscal year, charged against sick leave. With the new work schedule, there are times when employees will need to attend to personal business during the day. Since holiday time is now charged in i day increments, personal leave may be used in less than 1 day increments. Negotiations with the Rancho Cucamonga Firefighters Union were suspended at their request, due to the unknown revenue impacts of proposed actions in the State legislature. '—Q> COMPENSATION RESOLUTION August 5, 1992 Page 2 Adoption of the attached resolution implements the changes discussed above and continues the salaries at the same level as fiscal year 91/92. Re spec ully su i , Jim hart Administrative Services Director JH /rs attachment ,4 RESOLUTION NO. FO 92- �DLC A RESOLUTION OF THE FIRE BOARD OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. FD 91 -011 and NO. FO 91 -011A IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 WHEREAS, the Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and WHEREAS, the Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it competes in a marketplace to obtain qualified personnel to perform and provide municipal services, and that compensation and conditions of employment must be sufficiently attractive to recruit and retain qualified employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: SECTION 1: Salary Ranges SAFETY A 8 C Fire Chief 36.63 38.46 40.38 2930.40 3076.92 3230.77 6349.20 6666.66 7000.00 3% Deferred Comp 6538,54 6865.46 7208.74 9 42.40 3392.31 7350.00 7569.17 E 44.52 HOURLY 3561.92 31- WEEKLY 7717.50 MONTHLY 7947.63 Deputy Chief 33.30 34.97 36.71 38.55 40.48 HOURLY (Fire Marshal) 2664.00 2797.20 2937.06 3083.91 3238.11 BI- WEEKLY 5772.00 6060.60 6363.63 6681.82 7015.91 MONTHLY 2% Deferred Comp 5887.44 6181.82 6490.91 6815.45 7156.22 Battalion Chief 19.82 20.81 21.65 22.95 24.09 HOURLY 56 Hr. Workweek 2220.00 2331,00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.43 81- WEEKLY 4810.00 5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846.59 MONTHLY Battalion Chief 27.75 29.14 30.59 32.12 33.73 HOURLY 40 Hr 'Workweek 2220.00 2331.00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.43 81- WEEKLY 4810.00 5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846.59 MONTHLY Fire Captain 15.28 16.04 16.84 17.68 18.57 HOURLY 1710.98 1796.53 1886.36 1980.67 2079.71 BI- WEEKLY 3707,12 3892.48 4087.10 4291.46 4506.03 MONTHLY Fire Engineer 13.24 13.90 14,60 15.33 16.09 HOURLY 1482.86 1557.00 t634.85 1716.59 1802.42 81- WEEKLY 3212.86 3373,50 3542.18 3719.29 3905.25 MONTHLY /5 Resolution No. Page 2 Firefighter 11.76 12.35 12,91 13.62 14.30 HOURLY 1317.30 1383.17 1452.33 1524.94 1601.19 BI- WEEKLY 2854,16 2996.87 3146.71 3304.05 3469.25 MONTHLY Hazardous Material 16.08 16.85 17.65 18.49 19.37 HOURLY Premium Pay 1801.10 1886.85 1976.48 2070.79 2169.83 8I- WEEKLY Captain 3902.39 4087.74 4282.37 4486.72 4701.29 MONTHLY Hazardous Material 14.04 14.71 15.40 16.13 16.90 HOURLY Premium Pay 1572.98 1647.12 1724.97 1806.72 1892.55 BI- WEEKLY Engineer 3408.12 3568.77 3737.44 3914.55 4100.52 MONTHLY Hazardous Material 12.57 13.15 13.77 14,42 15.10 HOURLY Premium Pay 1407.43 1473.29 1542.45 1615.07 1691.31 BI- WEEKLY Firefighter 3049.42 3192.13 3341.97 3499.31 3664.51 MONTHLY Fire Prevention 19.66 20.59 21.56 22.58 23.66 HOURLY Inspector 1572.98 1647.12 1724.97 1806.72 1892.55 BI- WEEKLY 3408.12 3568.77 3737.44 3914.55 4100.52 MONTHLY Hazardous Material 19.82 20.81 21.85 22.95 24.09 HOURLY Coordinator 2220.00 2331.00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.43 BI- WEEKLY 4810.00 5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846.59 MONTHLY Deputy Fire Marshal 27,75 29,14 30.59 32.12 33.73 HOURLY 2220.00 2331.00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.42 81- WEEKLY 4810.00 5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846,59 MONTHLY NON- SAFETY Admin Services 22.27 23.38 24.55 25.78 27.07 HOURLY Officer 1781.65 1870.73 1964.27 2062.48 2165.61 8I- WEEKLY 3860,24 4053.25 4255.91 4468.71 4692.15 Mn.N-ui -y 2% Deferred Como 3938.99 4135.94 4342.74 4559.87 4787.87 Management 19.66 20.64 21.67 22.76 23.89 HOURLY Analyst IT 1572.55 1651.18 1733.74 1820.43 1911.45 81- WEEKLY 3407.20 3577.56 3756.44 3944.26 4141.47 MONTHLY Maintenance Officer 20.43 21.45 22.53 23.65 24.83 HOURLY 1634.52 1716.25 1802.06 1892.16 1986.77 81- WEEKLY 3541.47 3718.54 3904.47 4099.69 4304.67 MONTHLY Maintenance Tech 1.5.31 16.08 16.88 17.73 18.61 HOURLY 1225.16 1286.42 1350.74 1418.28 1489.19 BI- WEEKLY 2654.52 2787.25 2926.61 3072.94 3226.59 MONTHLY Communications Tech 15.31 16.08 16.88 17.73 18.61 HOURLY 1225.16 1286.42 1350.74 1418.28 1489.19 BI- WEEKLY 2654.52 2787.25 2926.61 3072.94 3226.59 MONTHLY Fire Equipment 15.31 16.08 16.88 17.73 18.61 HOURLY Mechanic 1225.16 1286.42 1350.74 1418.28 1489.19 81- WEEKLY 2654.52 2787.25 2926.61 3072.94 3226.59 MONTHLY SECTION 3: Dental Insurance The Fire District provides fully paid employee and family dental insurance plan for all full -time continuous salaried employees. SECTION 4: Vision Insurance The Fire District provides vision care coverage for all full time continuous salaried employees at a payment of up to $19.00 monthly beginning July 1, 1992. 17 Resolution No. Page 3 Fire Equip 11.47 12,04 12.64 13.28 13.94 HOURLY Sery Worker 917.50 963.37 1011.54 1062.12 1115.22 BI- WEEKLY 1987.91 2087.31 2191.67 2301.25 2416.32 MONTHLY Fire Safety Analyst 21.16 22.21 23.32 24.49 25.71 HOURLY 1692.42 1777.04 1865.90 1959.19 2057.15 BI- WEEKLY 3666.92 3850.26 4042.78 4244.91 4457.16 MONTHLY Fire Prevention 15.62 16.41 17.23 18.09 18.99 HOURLY Specialist 1249. 08 1312.48 1378.10 1447.01 1519.36 BI- WEEKLY 2708.29 2843.70 2985.89 3135.18 3291.94 MONTHLY Administrative 13.32 13.99 14.69 15.42 16.19 HOURLY Secretary 1065.84 1119.13 1175.09 1233.84 1295.53 BI- WEEKLY 2309.32 2424,78 2546.02 2673.32 2806.99 MONTHLY Secretary 11.58 12.16 12.77 13.41 14.08 HOURLY 926.80 913.14 1021.79 1072.88 1126.53 BI- WEEKLY 2008.06 2108.47 2213.89 2324.58 2440.81 MONTHLY Public Services 12.76 13.39 14.06 14.77 15.50 HOURLY Technician 1020.48 1071.50 1125.08 1181.33 1240.40 81- WEEKLY 2211.04 2321.59 2437.67 2559.56 2687.53 MONTHLY Office Specialist 11 9.73 10.22 10.73 11.26 11.83 HOURLY 778.46 817.39 858.25 901.17 946.23 BI- WEEKLY 1686.67 1771.00 1859.55 1952.53 2050.15 MONTHLY Office Specialist I 8.85 9.29 9.76 10.24 10.76 HOURLY 707.88 743.28 780.44 819.46 860.44 81- WEEKLY 1533.75 1610.43 1690.95 1775.50 1854.28 MONTHLY Apprentice 8.32 8.73 9.17 9.63 10.11 HOURLY Firefighter 931.45 978.02 1026.92 1078.27 1132.18 8I- WEEKLY 2018.13 2119.04 2224.99 2336.24 2453.05 MONTHLY SECTION 2: Health Insurance The Fire District provides fully paid employee and family health insurance for all full time continuous salaried and retired employees. SECTION 3: Dental Insurance The Fire District provides fully paid employee and family dental insurance plan for all full -time continuous salaried employees. SECTION 4: Vision Insurance The Fire District provides vision care coverage for all full time continuous salaried employees at a payment of up to $19.00 monthly beginning July 1, 1992. 17 Resolution No. Page 4 SECTION 5: Life insurance Non- safety, non - management full -time employees are entitled to a term life insurance policy of S30,000, paid by the Fire District. SECTION 6: Holidays Holidays are those days which the District designates as observed holidays. Holiday leave is a right, earned as a condition of employment, to a leave of absence with pay The holidays designated by the District are as follows: (1) January 1 - New Years Day (2) January 18 - Martin Luther King's Birthday (3) February 15 - President's Day (5) May 31 - Memorial Day (6) July 4 - Independence Day (7) September 6 - Labor Day (8) November 11 - Veteran's Day (9) November - Thanksgiving Day 10) November - The day following Thanksgiving 11) December - The day preceding Christmas 12) December 25 - Christmas Day 13) Three oiscretionary (floating) days may be taken by an employee at his /her convenience who has successfully completed probation subject to approval of the department head. Days may not be carried over from one calendar year to the next. Since these hours are discretionary, they would not be accrued. Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the holiday. SECTION 7: Holiday Hours 1. Holiday hours will accrue as holidays occur. 2. Employees assigned to alternative work schedules (i.e. 4/10) will be allowed to charge the equivalent number of hours for observance of a holiday, equal to the number of hours in the regularly scheduled work day (i.e. 4/10 schedule, 10 hours equals 1 day). However, the total number of holidays offered by the Fire District shall not be exceeded in hourly equivalent or days. SECTION 8: Flex Work Week Management employees shall be allowed to work a flexible work week upon the approval of their supervisor. SECTION 9: Uniform Allowance The Fire District provides 5425 annually to the Maintenance Technician and E4 Resolution No. FD Page 6 SECTION 12: Bereavement Leave 40 -hour Personnel In the event of death in the employee's immediate family, the employee shall be granted three (3) days paid bereavement leave. A maximum of five (5) days paid bereavement leave shall be granted if there is a death in the immediate family outside the state boundaries in accordance with rules and regulations. Shift Personnel In the event of a death in the employee's immediate family, the employee shall be granted two (2) shifts paid bereavement leave. A maximum of three (3) shifts paid bereavement leave shall be granted it there is a death in the immediate family outside the state boundaries in accordance with rules and regulations. SECTION 13: Military Leave Employees are entitled to thirty (30) days paid military leave in any one fiscal year, provided they have been employed by the district for one (1) year prior to this leave. Any employee with less than one years' service must use accrued annual leave or compensatory time if he wishes to receive his normal pay. SECTION 1: Personal Leave Employees can use up to 20 hours of accrued sick leave as personal leave. This 20 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1 hour, 1/2 hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for emergency situations requiring the employee's attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. SECTION 15: Work Related Injuries All management and non - management, non - safety and safety Fire District employees are entitled to their full salary and benefits when they sustain an on- the -job work related injury for up to one (1) year. (See Labor Code Section 4850 for provisions). Although Section 4850 covers only safety personnel, the Distict is extending this same benefit to nor, - safety employees. Temporary disability payments received during any injury period are to be returned to the Fire District. SECTION 16: Standby Pax Standby pay to Maintenance Officer, Maintenance Technician and Coimunication Technician shall be at the rate of 5195 per month. SECTION 17: Compensator Time 1. Professional and Management employees may earn compensatory time on a basis of 1 hour worked equals 1 hour of compensatory time. Compensatory time will not be granted for attendance at any regularly scheduled 1 Resolution No. FD Page 7 meetings of the Board of Directors, or any District Committee nor will compensatory tine be granted for additional working time beyond the normal working day necessary for efficient and effective department operations, or to maintain good public relations. Any such time shall be considered a part of the normal duties of the positions. 2. Compensatory time may be earned for required attendance at special meetings of the Board of Directors and District committees, except when such meetings are held in lieu of a regularly scheduled meeting or when such meetings are called and /or scheduled as part of the annual budget preparation process ano annual audit. 3. Compensatory time may also be earned for special and /or unusual work situations not provided for in the preceeding paragraphs. 4. The earning and accrual of compensatory time requires the approval of the employee's supervisor. SECTION 18: The provisions of the Memorandums of Understanding for the period July 1, 1988 through ,June 30, 1992, are incorporated by reference as part of this resolution. All provisions in those Memorandums of Understanding are in affect, unless otherwise modified by this resolution. SECTION 19, July 27, 1992 Implementation Items in this resolution that are changed as a result of the 4/10 program being implemented effective July 27, 1992 will not be effective until July 27, 1992 0e, vacation accrual, personal leave, etc.) PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this *th day of July, 1992. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, President ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga, Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Fire Board of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at a special meeting of said Board held on the * day of July, 1992. Executed this *th day of July, 1992 at Rancho Cucamonga, California d I RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT S DATE: August 5, 1992 10: President and Members of the Board Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Service Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF ANNUAL FEE SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATION The Fire Board adopt the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS implementation of the cost allocation and user fee study recommendations was completed during FY 90/91 for implementation in FY 91/92. A component of that implementation requires annual review of fees and modifications, if necessary. Staff has reviewed the fees established by the Board for fire services and determined that no changes are necessary for fiscal year 92/93. The Resolution before you for consideration continues the fees at the current rate. Therefore, there is no need for a public hearing and that is why this has been placed on the consent agenda. Since this resolution becomes part of the City's Comprehensive Fee Resolution, it is included on the Fire Board agenda and City Council agenda. The City's Comprehensive Fee Resolution includes changes, therefore, it is under the advertised public hearings section. If someone desired to comment on the Fire District fees, it would be appropriate to consider their comments during the Fire Board Meeting. — Respec fully su 'tt d, m art art Service Director JH:j V RESOLUTION NO. FD 91 -018 -A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91 -018 TO CLARIFY PERMIT ISSUANCE WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection. District has adopted Resolution No. 91-018 which sets fees reasonably borne from special services and activities; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Board cf Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve that clarification to verbiage regarding permit issuance is made without any change to fees: Section 6.0 Fire Protection District Pees 6.1 Plans Checking and Inspections 6.1.1 Start -up fee for commercial, industrial or multi- family dwelling units (paid prior to TRC) ......... $ 75.00 6.1.2 Plan review: building and /or system(s) inspection A. Single family residential .....................$ 120.00 B. Non - Residential development and multi- family Residential dwelling ..........................$ 620.00 C. Interior and /or exterior building alteration..$ 190.00 D. New Sprinkler Systems or over 10 heads ........ $ 150.00 Ten heads or less (alteration only) ........... $ 85.00 E. Fixed fire - extinguishing systems (i.e. carbon dioxide, potassium bicarbonate, halon, etc.)..$ 135.00 F. Fire Alarm Systems ............................$ 140.00 G. The charge for any revision of a previously approved plan or a change request (farm FED -2) for any of the above, shall be $85.00 per hour for the estimated time spent in review but not less than 25% of the original fee. II. Failure to keep consultation or field inspection appointment without notification (one hour minimum) .................... ..............................$ 60.00 I. Division consultation fees not otherwise stated (except phone consultations) (one hour minimum) ........... $ 125.00 23 _2- J. Fire flow test (one hour) .....................$ 40.00 K. Consultant plan check fee shall be paid by the developer /contractor or owner, and shall be paid prior to plan approval ....... ..............................$ 40.00 L. Field inspection requiring more than the initial inspection, plus one follow- up ....................$ 100.00 M. Field inspection of self - inspection occupancies who 'lave refused to conduct their own, inspection ...... $ 54.00 N. Underground Tanks 1. Original application /plan check /tank inspection ............. ..............................$ 135.00 2. Tank removal . ..............................$ 115.00 3. Inspection(s) resulting from leaks of unauthorized discharge .... ..............................$ 60.00 0. Hazardous chemicals: application /plan check /inspection (storage, handling or use as a solid, liquid or gas, other than underground ca nks) 1. 55 gallons corrosive liquid ................$ 80.00 2. 500 pounds oxidizing material ..............$ 80.00 3. 10 pounds organic or inorganic peroxides ... $ 90.00 4. 500 pounds nitromethane ....................$ 90.00 5. 1,000 pounds ammonia nitrate or fertilizer mixture (any amount of highly toxic material, pyrophoric, hypergolic, cryogenic material, poisonous gas or radioactive material ) ......................$ 90.00 6. Any reactive, unstable or other hazardous material not herein classified (extent or hazard and allowable amount to be stored to be determined by the Fire Marshal) ............ $ 125.00 P. Explosives and blasting agents: Application /plan check /inspection I. Manufacture, possess, store or sell ........ $ 95.00 2. To use explosives or blasting agents ....... $ 740.00 Q. Fumigation and thermal insecticidal fogging when toxic flammable .fumigant is used: application /plan check/ inspection .......... ..............................$ 110.00 Section 6.2 Permit Fees I. Permits (annual issuance or as otherwise noted) A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or 'A -3- operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions hazardous to life or property. (UFC 4.101) ................. ..............................$ 75.00 B. Storage of readily combustile material (UFC 11.203) ................. ..............................$ 105.00 C. Places of Assembly (except churches and schools) (UFC 25.101) 1. A -3, 50 -299 without stage ..................$ 85.00 2. A -2.11 300 or more without stage ........... $ 135.00 3. A -2, 999 or less with stage ................$ 155.00 4. A -1, 1000 or more with stage ...............$ 205.00 D. Bowling alley and pin refinishing (UFC 26.102).$ 75.00 E. Cellulose nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin) (UFC 27.102) ................. ..............................$ 75.00 F. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet (UFC 28 .102) ........................$ 75.00 G. Garages Motor vehicle repair (H -4) (UFC 29.102)........$ 75.00 M. Lumber yards (over 100,000 board feet) (UFC 30.101) ................. ..............................$ 75.00 I. Tire rebuilding plants (UFC 31.102 .............$ 120.00 J. Auto wrecking yards ............................$ 75.00 Junk or waste material, handling plants (UFC 34.102) K. Flammable finishes .............................$ 75.00 Spraying or dipping operations, spray booths, dip tanks, electrostatic apparatus, automobile undercoating, powder coating and organic peroxides and dual component coatings (UFC 45.102) (per spray booth) L. Magnesium (mere than 10 pounds per day) (UFC 48.102) ................. ..............................$ 115.00 M. Oil burning equipment operations (UFC 61.102)..$ 75.00 N. Ovens (industrial baking and drying) (UFC 62.102) ................. ..............................$ 75.00 0. Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 pounce of refrigerant) (UFC 63.101) ..... ..............................E 105.00 P. Compressed gases (store, handle or us exceeding 100 cubic feet) (UFC 74.103) a� -4- M 1. non flammable over 100 cubic feet and up to 5,999 cubic f eet ... ..............................$ 110.00 2. non flammable 6,000 to 12,000 cubic feet...$ 130.00 3. non - flammable over 12,000 cubic feet ....... $ 195.00 4. flammable over 100 cubic feet and up to 1,999 cubic feet ...........................$ 75.00 5. flammable 2,000 to 6,000 cubic feet ........ $ 125.00 6. flammable over 6,000 cubic feet ............ $ 125.00 Q. Cryogenic fluids (storage, handling or use) (UFC 15. 103) ............ ............... .. ......$ 75.00 R. Dust - producing processes and equipment (UFC 75.103) .. ............................... I.............$ 80.00 S. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage or handling or use) (UPC 79.103) 1. auto fueling station (S- 1) .................$ 90.00 2. inside storage, less than 60 gallons .... ...$ 80.00 3• inside storage, more than 60 gallons ....... $ 115.00 4. outside storage, more than 5000 gallons (UFC.79. 402) . ..............................$ 715.00 T. High piled combustible stock (UPC 81- 103) ...... $ 90.00 U. Liquified petroleum gas (store, handle, transport or use more than 120 gallons) (UPC 82.102)....$ 75.00 V. Matches (mere than 60 Matohman's gross) (UFC 83.107) ................. ..............................$ 75.00 W. Welding and cutting operations to conduct welding and /or cutting operations in any occupancy (UPC 49.101) ................. ..............................$ 75.00 X. Alarm company permits (to install units within Fire District) annual permit ........................$ 95.00 li. Special Services A. Hoard of appeals fee (to file an appeal and requiring a special meeting). • ............................. $ 225.00 B. Excessive or malicious false alarms causing response of fire apparatus I. Code 3 response due to "failure to notify" fire department when working on or testing sprinkler or fire alarm system M _5 $140.00 per hour per piece emergency apparatus responding 1/2 hour minimum 2. Trouble alarm Code 2 response due to failure to notify fire department when working on or testing system $70.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus responding 112 hour minimum 3. Malicious false alarms $140.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus responding with 112 hour minimum 4. Alarm system malfunction resulting in Emergency Code 3 response $140.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus responding to all false alarms in excess of 2 false alarms in 30 days with 1/2 hour minimum 5. Alarm systems malfunction resulting in a trouble alarm Code 2 response $70.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus responding to all trouble alarms in excess of 2 in 30 days with 112 hour minimum 6. Code 3 response to false alarms due to negligence, tampering with system construction or modification of building $140.00 per hour per piece of emergency apparatus responding with 112 hour minimum C. Response to mitigate extended hazardous chemical and material incidents beyond normal service request (this includes response to railroad properties, Freeways, and aircraft crashes) 1. Hazardous incident, per hour $235 per hour per piece of apparatus 2. Company Response $95.00 per hour per piece of equipment 3. Squad Response $75.00 per hour -6- U. Company with Battalion Chief $140.00 per how 5. Hazardous materials or major transportation incident response due to negligence $150.00 per hour per piece of equipment 6. Response to mitigate major transportation incidents (may include but not be limited to jetliner crash, railroad derailment or collision, or major freeway collision with extraordinary circumstances) $150.00 per hour per piece of apparatus B. Special Activities -- One time events (combination of plan check, fire permit, field inspection. These events may need the services, at permittees expense, of one or more standby firemen). 1. Fireworks -- public display (UFC Article 78) $75.00 plus $140.00 per hour per piece of apparatus 2. Specialty public displays and /or sales (i.e. Christmas free lots, pumpkin sale lots) .... $ 45.00 3. Conducting any blasting operation (for each four hour period or fraction thereof) $100 plus $140.00 per hour per piece of apparatus 4. Special events (public assembly, stage productions, exhibits, previewing stands, grandstands and bleachers, trade shows, concerts, banquets, etc., other than tents and air supported structures) a. Less than 30,000 square feet at an occupant load of 2,000, whichever is more restrictive ......... ..............................$ 125.00 b. 3,000 square feet or more, but less than 60,000 square feet or an occupant load of more than 2,000 but less than 4,000, whichever is more restrictive .......... $ 165.00 c. 60,000 square feet or more, but less than 90,000 square feet or an occupant load of more that; 4,000 but less than 6,000 whichever is more restrictive .......... $ 200.00 d. 90,000 square feet or more with an occupant ,C) S -7- load of 6,000 or more, whichever is more restrictive ............................$ 235.00 5. Tents and air- supported structures (0FC Article 32) a. Less than 400 square feet ..................$ 75.00 b. 401 to 1500 sq. ft .........................$ 100.00 c. 1501 to 15,000 sq. ft ......................$ 130.00 d. 15,001 to 30,000 sq. ft ....................$ 160.00 e. over 30,000 sq. ft .........................$ 190.00 iII. Repeal of Resolution This Resolution repeals Resolution 91 -018. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 5th day of August, 1992. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, President ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, Secretary I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 5th day of August, 1992. Executed this 5th day of August, 1992, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, Secretary �aq