HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/07/02 - Agenda PacketV
F
U cn.Hph
�' QTY OF
< ' 0 RAWM QJCAMO CA
• 4
CITY COUNUL
g z AGENDA
U >
1977
July 2, 1980
AGENDA ITEMS: All items submitted for the City Council agenda must be in writing.
The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and
third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Pledge to Flag.
B. Roll Call: Frost_, Mikels_, Palumbo_, Bridge_, and Schlosser_
C. Approval of minutes: June 9, 1980 and June 18, 1980.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. r=
a. Historical Commission meeting, July 8, 1980, 7:00 p.m. at Lion's Park
Community Center.
b. Appointment to fill Planning Commission vacancy.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontro-
versial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion.
a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80 -6 -30 for $504,773.49.
b. Tract 9539 - Acceptance of Map, Bonds, and Agreement; 1
Tract 9539 received tentative approval from the County
on January 1, 1977. This tract is located on the west
side of Sapphire Street between Banyan Street and Hillside
Road and consists of 19 lots. A vet -aside letter in the
amount of $174,000.00 to guarantee off -site improvements
has been submitted along with Improvement Agreement.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -65 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
TRACT MAP 9539, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
0
City Council Agenda
-2-
c. Tract 9351 - Release of Bonds and Acceptance of Sub-
stitution Bonds. Located on the west side of Sapphire
Street between 19th Street and Banyan. Owner: Mark
III Homes.
Release the following bonds..
Performance Bond (road) $148,000
Labor & Material (road) 74,000
Performance Bond (water) 45,000
Labor & Material (water) 22,500
Accept the following substitute bonds:
Performance Bond (road) $148,000
Labor & Material (road) 148,000
d. Contract for the Collection of Special Assessments -
Landscape Maintenance District.
Approval of agreement authorizing the County Auditor
to assess $2.00 to property owners to cover the cost
of assessment collections on Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1.
e. Acceptance of Signal Contract at Haven Avenue and Amber
Lane and Authorization to record a Notice of Completion.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -66
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL WORK AT HAVEN
AVENUE AND AMBER LANE AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK.
f. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement (Director Review No
80 -02).
Wallner Tooling was conditionally approved to install
or bond for the street construction of 7th Street by
Director Review 80 -02. They were informed that when
Caltrans made a decision as to the approval or denial
of the on -off ramp, they may have to install improvements
on Hyssop. The following bonds are per staff agreement
with Mr. Wallner.
Performance Bond (surety) $16,000
Labor & Material (surety) 16,000
July 2, 1980
15
9a
9r
27
28
City Council Agenda -3-
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW
NO. 80 -02.
g. Parcel Map 5545 - Replacement Bonds.
Located on the north side of Base Line west of Archibald
for three lots. Owner: Lewis Homes.
The subject Parcel Map was approved by Council on March 5,
1980 along with bonds for the required street improve-
ments. Subsequent design checks resulted in the elimina-
tion of a city requested cul -de -sac for Roberds Court.
Therefore, the bond of the cul -d -sac could be eliminated.
Release of bonds:
Performance Bond (surety) $20,000
Labor & Material (surety) 20,000
Replacement bonds:
Performance Bond (surety) $10,000
Labor & Material (surety) 10,000
h. Parcel Map 5358 - Acceptance of Map.
Located on the east side of Archibald at the north
city limits. Owner: Mr. Worth Hooper.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5358 (TENTA-
TIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5358).
i. Tract 9366: Release of bonds. Uocated on the north-
west corner of 19th Street and Haven Avenue. Owner:
Valle Verde Ltd.
Performance Bond (road) $78,000
j. Tract 9427: Release of bonds. Located on the north
and south sides of Banyan Street between Hermosa Avenue
and Haven Avenue. Owner: Lesny /Wilshire Properties
Landscaping Bonds $12,000
July 2, 1980
29
35
40
41
City Council Agenda -4- July 2, 1980
k. Tract 9429: Release of Temporary Occupancy Permit Bond 44
for on -site subdivision sign located at the northwest
corner of Haven and 19th Street. Owner: Valle Verde, Ltd.
T.O.P. Bond $250.00
1. Tract 9321: Release of Temporary Occupancy Permit Bond 45
for sales office /garage conversion on lot 4 and on -site
subdivision sign. Located at the norwest corner of
Alta Loma Drive and Sapphire Street. Owner: Crowell -
Leventhal, Inc.
T.O.P. Bond $2,000
Savings Passbook 250.
m. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage license. Pump 'n Pastry 46 ug- �.
Food Stores, Inc., 9687 Base Line Road for ea -sale
beer and wine license.
G 47
n. Authorization for City Council members and City Manager to
attend the First Mayors and Council Members Executive Forum,
July 23 -25 in Monterey.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize for as
many Council members as possible and for the City Manager
to attend the first Mayors and Councilmembers Executive
Forum to be sponsored by the League of California Cities.
The program is aimed at providing Councilmembers and key
staff representatives with an ongoing education concerning
the responsibilities of locally elected and appointed
officials. Funds have been included in the meetings and
travel budget for this conference attendance.
Set July 16, 1980 for public hearing on the expenditure
of Revenue Sharing Funds.
It is recommended that the City Council set a public hearing
for July 16, 1980 to review the proposed expenditure of
Revenue Sharing funds. The public hearing is a federal re-
quirement and must be preceeded by the appropriate advertising
in the local newspapers.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. POSTPONEMENT OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AS A CONDITION OF SUB- 51
DIVISON AND DEVELOPMENT - REVISION TO ORDINANCE NOS. 28 _
AND 58).
At its June 18, 1980 meeting, the Council expressed concern
that provisions for postponement be more specifically de-
fined and that other cases receive direct Council review.
City Council Agenda -5- duly 2, 1980
Section 1 of Ordinance No. 28 -A has, therefore, been
revised to include four special conditions and allowing
further appeal to the Planning Commission and Council.
ORINANCE NO. 28 -A (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUB-
SECTION 9f, OF SECTION 2.12 OF ORDINANCE NO.
28 TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE RE-
QUIREMENT THAT ALL OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS BE
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF NINE (9) MONTHS
FOLLOWING THE RECORDATION OF A PARCEL MAP FOR
EACH LOT UPON WHICH THERE EXISTS A BUILDING
OR OTHER USABLE STRUCTURE AT THE TIME OF SUCH
RECORDATION.
ORDINANCE NO. 58 -B (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 5B TO PERMIT THE USE OF LIEN
AGREEMENTS AS SECURITY FOR THE FUTURE CON-
STRUCTION OF OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
B. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - C. H.
BRUBAKER. A request for change of zone from R- 1- 20,000 to
R -1- 10,000 or more restrictive zoning for property located
on the southeast corner of Banyan and Amethyst Streets.
ORDINANCE NO. 113 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1062- 401 -11 FROM
R- 1- 20,000 TO R -1- 10,000 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH-
EAST CORNER OF BANYAN AND AMETHYST STREETS.
C. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT AREA.
Proposed Ordinance to designate the area bounded by Eighth
Street on the South, Arrow Route on the North, Miltikep on
the East and Haven Avenue on the.West as a special impact
zone where no increases in site drainage may be creat;.
ORDINANCE NO. 111 (first reading) J
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
A SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT ZONE NORTH OF THE
SANTE FE RAILROAD TO ARROW ROUTE BETWEEN HAVEN
AND MILLIKEN AVENUES, AND REQUIRING DETAILED
ENGINEERING STUDIES AND MITIGATION MEASURES IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH.
52
54
i
55
65
66
67
i1.
City Council Agenda -6- July 2, 1980 -,[
D. PROPOSED INCREASE FOR INDUSTRIAL STORM DRAIN FEE.
Proposal to adopt Ordinance No. 112 to increase storm
drain fees in the area bounded by Deer Creek on the West,
Day Creek on the East, 4th Street and Foothill Bouievard.
Proposed fee - $4600 /acre.
ORDINANCE NO. 112 (first reading) _6g
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA, MAKING
ORDINANCE NO. 75 APPLICABLE THERETO, AND
ESTABLISHING A DRAINAGE FEE IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH.
E. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 110. 4-1 7'4:
ORDINANCE NO. 110 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMIN-
ISTRATION AND DELEGATING ADMINISTRATION
THEREOF TO THE CITY MANAGER.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
A. R[QUEST FROM CALTRANS TO SUPPORT COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE
BETWEEN SAN BERANRDINO AND LOS ANGELES.
Caltrans has requested cities between San Bernardino and
Los Angeles to approve Resolutions supporting the proposed
San Bernardino to Los Angeles commuter rail project.
It is significant to note that the recommendation to esta-
blish the commuter rail service was proposed by Caltrans
without the effective study or the participation of the
San Bernardino County Transportation Commission or any
city located along the proposed route.
The SANB,AG Board of Directors has expressed a concern over the
lack of joint planning on this important transportation issue.
Concern has also been expressed regarding the potential
economic obligations at some point in the future. The resolu-
tion strongly urges that all appropriate regional agencies
and cities be fully involved in all planning and implementa-
tion activities from this day forward. In addition, the
revolution has been changed, at the suggestion of SANBAG, to
indicate that concurrence does not imply future participation
or future funding of any portion of the project.
City Council Agenda -1- July 2, 1960
Recommendation: If the City Council wishes to support the
proposed San Bernardino to Los Angeles commuter rail project,
the approval of Resolution No. 80 -69 is required. It is also
recommended that copies be sent to SANBAG, the Caltrans
District 8 Director, and to Caltrans in Sacramento.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -69 5Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE BET-
WEEN SAN BERNARDINO/RIVERSIDE AND LOS ANGELES.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT.
B. ADJOURNMENT.
CITY OF RANCHO CUC VNK NGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980 LII TJ'D
TO: City Council and City Manager 1977
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Tract Map 9539 - Acceptance of Map, Bonds and Agreement
The subject tract map received tentative approval from the County
on January 1, 1977. This tract is located on the west side of
Sapphire Street between Banyan Street and Hillside Road and
contains 19 lots.
The subdivider, D.P.B. Partnership, has made arrangements with
C.C.W.D. for sewer and water installations. The subdivider has
submitted an agreement and letter of credit to insure installa-
tion of required street improvements_ The security offered is a
$174,000.00 Improvement Security Instrument divided as follows:
Faithful Performance $87,000.00
Labor and Material $87,000.00
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached
resolution and direct:
1. The Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement and security
instrument on behalf of the City.
2. The City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf
of the City.
3. The City Engineer to forward the map for recording.
Respectfully submitted,
LBII: JLM; as
Attachments _
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9539.
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 9539, consisting of 19
lots, submitted by Brubaker, Davis, and Person, Partnership Subdivider,
located on the west side of Sapphire Street between Banyon Street and
Hillside Road has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said
Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map
Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements
of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered
the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution
by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security,
and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for
public use the streets delineated thereon:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows;
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said
City, the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and,
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City
Attorney; and,
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating
same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute
the certificate thereon on behalf of said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 19.
AYFS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk
N
I.II i kn
R S CI -l() C;C NIONGIA
TITLE: McF acCer - --
t:zl milT �—
s
W
d
2I
a
0
a
SIT.
NORTIi
KNOW AI.I, MEN BY TiFSE PI:ESENrS: 'rhos this al:reemcnt is made and entered
in Le, in - enformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the
State of California, and of the applicable ordinances of the City of Rancho
Curaninngn, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, here-
inafter referred to as the City, and
Brubaker, Davis, and Person, Partnership hereinafter
referred to as the Subdivider.
WITNESSETH:
TILT, lJHERHAS, said Subdivider desires to subdivide certain real property in
said City as shown on the previously approved Tentative Map of Tract No. 9539
and,
WHLREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Sub-
divider as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract by said City;
NOW, Till:RUORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Subivider as
follows:
1. The Subdivider hereby agrees.to construct at Sobdivider's expense all im-
provements described on Page 5 hereof within twenty -four months from the
date hereof.
2. This igreer..ent shall run for a period of 12 months from the date
of the resolution of tilt Council of said City approving said Final Map and
this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following
the second anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time
has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided.
3. The Subdivider may request an extension of time to complete the terms here-
of. Stich request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than
4 weeks before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement
of circunstances necessitating the extension of time. The City shall have
the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the con-
struction stnnd.MIS, cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require
adjust -ents therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term
hereof.
4. If the Subdivider fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have the right at any till, to cause said provi-
sions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Sub-
divider and /or his surety the full cost and expense incurred.
5. 'file Subdivider shall provide u:clered water service to eaah lot an said Tract
in necordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga
County Water District.
G. lltil it y -Drl•u r.l t- Statement. Subdivider shall file with ill(, City Engineer,
prior Lo Ll,e ro,imoot rn•r n of airy work to be performed within the area: dr:;-
cr;hed bq >:,lid 111,1•, ,1 wri Llen st.tLemont nigned by Suhdivider, and each public
ntil its u+rp,.rat inn involved, to the eff,oL Lh.1t Subdivider Ills made Lho
-Ir 1111 •; iL Icl:•1I IV Ingo it rd by surd puh11v ul i111y cot poraL ion for the Conoce-
tiun of any and all pubti[ utilities to he supplied by such Corporation with-
in eueh suhdivisinn.
]. The Subdivider shall Iv rosponsihle for repl lcomrut, relocation, or removal
of any eampnnrnt. of any ieriHdlion wain system in conflict with construction
of required improvements to the satin action of the City Engineer and the
owner of such water system.
I1WROCENEN'f AGREEMENT TRACT 10. 9539 PACE 2
d. 1, prnr, :ent,; r, 'I'd rod to be coast rur Lad ;iii.11l eonfu rm to L e SL andanl
Dr;iwi,.[s and SLar,d n rd Spite if icat i ns of the City, and to ti e• Improvements
Non .lpproved by and an file in the office of till' City Engineer. Said
i; "prnvpmd"t.4 are tnbul.aled on the CI1nFLruCti On and hand Estimate, hereby
i;uorporaled an page i horeof, as taken from the improvement plans listed
thetoon by number, l'he Subdivider shall also bo rc•spmisible for construc-
tion rf an4 transflinns or other Lncidental work bcYnnd the tract bound-
aries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage.
9. CO n S l'urtiun permits shall be obtained by the Sublliv Lder from the office of
the Ci tv Engincor prior to start of work; all. regulations listed thereon
.shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of
dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of
public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section
s'oall be subject to the penalties provided therefor.
10. The Subdivider shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other
debris from public rights of way within or adjoining said Tract resulting
from development work relative to said Tract.
11. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion.
12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Subdivider after
other improvement work, grading, and cleanup has been completed. Planting
.shall be done as provided by ordinance in accordance with the planting dia-
gram approved by the City Community Development Director in all locations
where the adjoining; lot I +as lice" completely developed and built upon.
The Subdivider shall be res-
ponsible for maintaining all trees planted in good health until the end of
the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever
is later.
13. The Subdivider is responsible for meeting all conditions established by the
City pursuant to the Subdivision Nap Act, City ordinances, and this agree-
ment for tale Tract, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed
thefenndor until the Tract is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no
impruvencnt security provided herewLth shall be released before such accep-
tance. unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the
city.
llt. 11lis n { {feencnl shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee bond here -
i
,.a> been lcleason 6y the City, nr until n new agreement
ltlrothrr with the required improvement security lies been Submitted to the
GiLv by a Suceessor to the Subdivider heroin named, and by resolution of the
C r: l: +nncil sane has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement
security therefor has been released.
li. 'giro irprnvemoot aocurity to be Curnishod by the Subdivider with this agree -
nent slmli consist of the following, and shall be approved by the City
Attorney;
91
A. A faithful performance guarantee bond assuring completion by the Sub-
divider of all conditions prerequisite to acceptance of the Tract by
the City.
B. A ma Lo r of and labor payment quarantee bond assuring pavment in Cull by
the Subdivider for all materials, services, equipment rentals, and labor
furnished to the Subdivider in the course of meeting the conditions of
this agreement.
C. A cash dcpunit with the City to guarantee payment by the Subdivider to
Lhe tract engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final
Tract ?lap for the setting of all tract boundary, lot corner, and street
renLerlioc monumcn Ls and for furnishing; conterline tie notes to the City.
The amount of the deposit may be any an.ount certified by the tract eng-
inecr or snrvevor as acceptable paynicnL in full; or, if no value is sub-
the cash hand shall be as shown on the Construction and [fond
Estimate contained herein.
RCE22B
me
flIPROVI ENT AGRF.EMEN'T TRACT A0. 9539 PAGE 3
.`;.i id c•ish dr posit may ho refunded .0 tiwn ;Ii 1, roccdn rc• pc r:oits If ter
rote, !lit by the CiLy of the Conte rl ino tin notes and wrLtten assurance
Alf pavment in full from the tract engineer ar nurvevor.
D. the required bonds and the prineipnl mmounts thereof are set forth on
page 4 of this agreement.
ib. 'Ihe ma Lntenance ,;uarantce henJ he rein.tbnvc referred to shall be furnished
IA' the Subdivider to iiunrnntee anv and all portions of all improvements
frre of (III of mntcrials or workmonrhip for a period of one year from
Ihr date of accrptance of the Tract by the City, and shall be furnished
nrinr Lo such ncceptnncc and release of the nbovo described improvement
socuriLy. This maintenance Ruar.intee bond also specifically includes all
specil' led work of any parkway maintenance assessment district that may be
a requirement of this tract, during the period of time for which the Sub-
divider is required to provide. such maintenance.
Sold maintenance guarantee bond shall equal 57. of the construction esti-
maLe or $200.00, whichever is greater.
17. That the Devcloper shall take out and maintain, during the term of this
nl;rcca•.cnt, such puhl is liability and Property damage insurance as shall
protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered
by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because
of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether
such operations be. by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or
anyone directly or indirectly employed by said persons, even though such
damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor
or Subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public liability
and property damage insurance shall also directly protect the City, its
officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors
and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall
so state. The amounts of such insurance shall be as follows:
A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death lia-
bility litints of not Less than $300,000 for each person and $1,000,000
for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits
of not less than $100,000 for each accident or occurrence with an agg-
regate limit of $200,OGO for claims which may arise from the operations
of the Developer fn the performance of the work herein provided,
B. Automnbile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the per-
formance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits
of not Lees than $200,000 for each person and $300,000 for each acci-
dveL o- nrr urronce, and property damage liability limits of ,lot less
Lhan $50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with in aggregate of not
less thou $100,000 which may arise from the operations of the Developer
or his Contractor in performing the work provided for herein.
18. That !ad ore Lhe oxcrntion of this agreemenL, the Developer shall file with
the City a certificate or certificntus of insurance covering the specified
invrr once.
Each such cortificaLe Shall bear an endorsement precluding the
cnnc,,llatirnts, or reduction in cnverage of any policy evidences by such
ccrtificoLe, before the expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall
',.n e received noti fi.cat ion by registered mail from the insurance carrier.
1MPR0C1'.Ml:NT ; ;RFF:IEN'r TRACT NO. 9539 PAGE 4
. .e ih•nn'
of nndr ectnnJiul: the proaiviunv n+nlainod berc'in, and of intent'
L cnrplc ith s. uiu•, t Snbd i vider bns >'ubmi ttcd the br low described improve-
ment securi LV, ,md has at fixed his sign.iture hcrcln:
FAI'I'III'UI. PERFORMANCE [$ONO
Descrit,LLon: Set aside letter Principal Amount$87,000.00
Surety: Bank of America
At to t'ac C -in -fall:
Address:
t1,%lERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT BOND
Dcscri ption; Set aside letter Principal Amoun1$87,000.00
Surety: Bank of America
ALturney- in- Fart:
Address:
CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTING BOND
Amount stipulated by tract engineer or surveyor: $2, 500. 00
Amount as shown on Construction and Bond Estimate: $2,500-00
Amount deposited per Cash Receipt No.
MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND
To be posted prior to dcceptance of the tract by the City.
Principal Amount:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN 'dTT'BESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these Presents to be
duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the
dates set for opposite the* signatures.
Date Subdivider
Date— ' / / =�'r'[[ by lL Subdivider
Date _�_ // —QG - -- by 1i(%ICbJ>`_.— . Subdivider
(PannersA�ph�
SPATE OF CALIFOP. NIA
COUNTYOF San Ber
Y
y
90MLEINSURANO
AND MUST
SS. \ X fi � CALIFOILNIA
before me, the undersigned. a Noury Public in and for said State, penend1Y Wtuad
_Cal. Brubaker, Theodore Davis and Rev H Person
on
Mayor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtONCA
CONSTRUCTION AND BONI) ESTDIATE
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
(Attach to "Inspector's Copy ")
DATE: June 6, 1980 PERMIT NO. COMPUTED BY J. L. Martin
File Reference Tract 9539 City Drawing No.s
NOT: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement replace-
ment deposits.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
OVANTT7Y
I UNIT
UNIT COST
S AMOUNT
GR,1UP: 1IGIIT uF WAY
4 811
S. F.
S
14,433. 00
Rli):OY:L.S. MISC
L.S.
A. C.
40,947
S.F.
.43
17,607.21
A. C. iIERN
L. F.
Cl.'RR ;. CrTT!!R
2,423
L. F.
6.00
14,537.00
CROSS (;UIT!Ilt /SPANDREL
79T
S.F.
2.40
SIDE::' \Ln
S.F.
DIUVP: ,A:'P i:u,ACli ifS - residential
410
S.F.
1.60
CaL'S!!ED \C(;REGATP: RASE 1
S.F-
STSF — T,Tr!;TF,
5
2000. 00
i0 000.00
4" 3i.:)'6XOD HEADER
I
—2".X
STitLET SII;::S
2
100.00
zoo.00
R.C.P.
CATCH BASIN
EEA.
STRUCT'RE
CURB ONLY
126
A.C. OVERLAY
8,613
.12
A.C. REMOVAL
GUARD POST
1 40
2.00
80.0
GUARD PANEL
8
34.00
272.0
STREET TREES
i 38
50.00
i,900.00I
I
1
I
13LOCE wALt,
51
6.
!; I LLS
167
L.F.
9.00
1 503.0
I,.1::DSC1.!'F. Iaii IC:1'II0:7
I
L.S.
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 78,613.77
F
INSPECTION FEES
ITEM
I QUANTITY
.IT
I INIT COST
AM
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION -
of Construction Cost Estimate
L.S.
IL.S.
T.. S.
"WF11F!7' P!'T OR TREE
°
PI:;IN1NS.`T PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT
L.F.
STORE `!A'I'ERTAL TV RIGIIT -OF -WAY
117.A.
1. TOTAL INSPECTION FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,666.62
TI. COMPACTION TEST FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$
III. 10' CONTINGENCIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7.R61-IS
TV. DESIGN FEES (10% of Total Construction Cost Estimate) . . . . $
TOTAL . $86.475.15
Faithful Performance Bond - $
Material and Labor Bond = $
Maintenance Bond = $
Cash Monumenting Deposit = $
RCE22E
87,000.00
87,000.00
2,500.00
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY INSTRUMENT
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
For the Project Known As
Tract 9539
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
day of , 19_, by and between
I=k of America , hereinafter "Lender ",
Brubaker Davis & Person, Partnership , hereinafter
"Borrower ", and THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
hereinafter "City ", provides as follows:
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Lender is a financial institution subject to
regulation by the state or federal government within the
meaning of California Government Code Section 66499(a)(3);
and, I
WHEREAS, from the proceeds of a loan from Lender to
Borrower, Lender has on deposit, for the account of Borrower,
the sum of $ ]74, C00.00 , one -half (1 /2) of which
shall constitute and be referred to as "the performance
fund" and the other one -half (1/2) of which shall constitute
and be referred to as the "payment fund "; and,
WHEREAS, Borrower has entered into an Agreement, herein-
after "the Agreement ", with the City whereby Borrower agrees
to install and complete certain designated public improvements,
which said Agreement, dated , 19--1
and identified as referring to Project Iyact
is hereby referred to and made a part hereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the City giving
final approval to the Project known as Tract 9539
and authorizing the recordation of any tract or parcel map
pertaining thereto, Lender and Borrower agree:
(1) The performance fund is security pledged to the
City to insure that Borrower, its heirs, successors, executors
and administrators, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and will and truly keep and perform the covenants,
conditions and provisions of the Agreement and any alterat-
ion thereof made as therein provided, on Borrower's part to
be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein
specified and in all respects according to its true and
lawful meaning, and to insure that Borrower, its heirs,
successors, executors and administrators, shall indemnify
and save harmi.ess City, its offigIrs, agents and employees
as stipulated in the Agreement. //
(2) Lender shall disburse the performance fund to the
City in such amounts as the City demands, promptly upon re-
ceipt of written demands signed by the City Engineer of the
City, and specifying therein that Borrower is in default
under the Agreement or this Agreement.
. (3) In the event City commences legal action to re-
cover all or any portion of the performance fund, then the
City shall be entitled to recover, in addition to the amount
of the performance fund, costs and reasonable expenses and
fees, including reasonable attorney's fees.
-1-
lz
(4) Lender and Borrower agree that the payment fund is
security pledged for the payment of all contractors, sub-
contractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons em-
ployed in the performance of the Agreement and who are
referred to in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of
Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of
California for materials furnished or labor performed of any
kind, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act
with respect to such work or labor, and that Lender will pay
the same in an amount not exceeding the payment fund, and in
case suit is brought will pay, in addition to the payment
fund, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including
reasonable attorney's fees._
(5) This Agreement and the payment fund shall inure to
the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corpora-
tions entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil
Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their
assigns in any suit brought upon this Agreement or against
the payment fund.
(6) No change, extension of time, alteration or addi-
tion to the terms of the Agreement or to the work to be
performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the
same shall in any wise affect this Agreement or Lender and
Borrower's obligations hereunder, and they do hereby waive
notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Agreement or to the work or to
the specifications. This Agreement shall become effective
upon acceptance by the City and shall remain in full force
and effect until such time as the City shall release the
performance fund and payment fund as hereinafter provided.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lender and Borrower have executed
this Agreement on the day and year first above written.
LENDER:
Bank of America
(Name zse e
(Title) Manager
BORROWER:
I3Brubaker, Davis, s Person, Partnership
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby accepts
the foregoing Improvement Security Instrument and agrees:
(1) Upon final completion and acceptance of the re-
quired work, and the performance of all acts specified in
the Agreement, City will release any part of the performance
fund not claimed by the City in accordance with the above
provisions, not needed as security deemed necessary by the
City for any guarantee or warranty period or not needed as
security for costs and reasonable expenses and fees of the
City, including reasonable attorney's fees.
(2) Six (6) months after the completion and acceptance
of the required work, City will release the payment fund
except such part thereof as equals the total of all claims
on which an action has been filed and notice thereof given
in writing to the City Council of the City.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
a municipal corporation
BY:
Mayor
CITY OF RAiNUb CUO�NnV,-k
STAFF REPORT
MINN
DATE: July 2, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Consent Calendar - Release of Bonds and
Acceptance of Substitute Bonds
Tract 9351 - Release of bonds and acceptance of substitute bonds.
Located on the west side of Sapphire Street between 19th Street
and Banyan.
Release the existing letter of credit from Mark III Homes:
Performance (road) $148,000.00
Labor and Material (road) $ 74,000.00
Performance (water) $ 45,000.00
Labor and Material (water) $ 22,500.00
Accept the substitute letter of credit from Mark III Homes:
Performance (road) $148,000.00
Labor and Material (road) $148,000.00
Note: The C.C.W.D. has accepted the water bonds. Mark III has
changed financial instititutions, therefore, new letter of credit
had to be executed.
Respetfully submitted,
LBH:Bi jas
)5
U
C
U N I T E D C A L I F O R N I A BANK
REAL ESTATE LOAN DEPARTMENT - 4663 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD • NEWPORT REACH. CALIFORNIA -TEL. )14/558'5133
N��Li AL 4�Cwf 55 B}Lld )i"N[w oOxf OC •CN.C.L:�pBNi•9}df)
June 13, 1980
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Tract No. 9351 - Residential Subdivision. Off -site Improvements
Road Agreement (100'/, of estimated cost of improvements)
Gentlemen:
This will serve as notice and agreement that United California Bank,
a financial institution subject to regulations by the State or
Federal Government, holds in a loan fund the amount of $148,000,
pledging these funds to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to meet the
performance and completion of off -site improvements on a subdivision
of Rancho De Cucamonga, Inc., known as Tract No. 9351, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, according to that agreement
dated December 28, 1977 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the
Owners as above stated.
The $148,000 will be disbprsed according to our Building Loan Agreement
with the owner and only upon written approval of a duly authorized
representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Said funds to be
disbursed after United California Bank has satisfied itself that the
work to be paid for has been performed; however, in the event that
the City determines the owner has failed to complete and /or pay for
the subdivision off -site improvements as required by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, the above sum shall be immediately available to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to complete and /or pay for the cost of said
improvements.
16
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK
City of Rancho Cucamonga
June 13, 1980
Page 2
This agreement shall expire upon the disbursement to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga or upon acceptance by the City of that portion
of the aforementioned work secured by this instrument.
Sincerely
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK, a California corporation
BY: ��, J.. mss.. -v L•L
R. J. Dwyer, Assistant Vice President
This agreement approved:
RANCHO DE CUCAMONCA, INC
a California corporation
By:
Steven H. Sanberg, President
ACCEPTED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
a Municipal corporation
By:
Date
U
C
U N I T E D C A L I F O R N I A BANK
REAL ESTATE LOAN DEPARTMENT • 46V MACARTHUR BOULEVARD • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA • TELJ15I55B 5133
x,i Li NO '.DRESS ell Ill' H1.'ORl lli,( n. IRLl rI Il.A 11661
June 24, 1980
.�Jtd 2 4 I�aO
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730
RE: Labor and Material -000% of estimated cost of improvements)
Tract No. 9351 - Road Agreement
Gentlemen:
This will serve as notice and agreement that United California
Bank, a financial institution subject to regulations by the
State or Federal Government, holds in a loan fund the amount
of $148,000, pledging these funds to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
for the payment of labor and materials on a subdivision of Rancho
De Cucamonga, Inc., known as Tract No. 9351, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, according to that agreement
dated December 28, 1977, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and the Owners as above stated.
The $148,000 will be disbursed according to our Building Loan
Agreement with the owner and only upon written approval of a
duly authorized representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Said funds to be disbursed after United California Bank has
satisfied itself that the work to be paid for has been performed;
however, in the event that the City determines the owner has
failed to complete and /or pay for the subdivision off -site
improvements as required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the
above sum shall be immediately available to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga to complete and /or pay for the cost of said improvements.
This agreement shall expire upon the disbursement to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga or six (6) months after the acceptance of the
City of that portion of the above mentioned work secured by this
agreement, provided no stop notices or other action has been
taken In pursuance to the law made, and provided by persons
supplying labor and materials to the work of improvement above
described.
I VA
,o CALIFORNIA BANK
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page Two
June 24, 1980
Sincerely,
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK, a California Corporation
R. J. Dwye J Assistant Vice President
This Agreement Approved:
RANCHO DE CUCAMONGA, INC.,
a California C�or poratio
BY:� f / .
Sth4en If. Sanberg, Pres den
Date:
ACCEPTED:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation
BY:
Date:
RJDIlp
117
San Diego Federal CuLlnrnrn'. FaruA. Fv--i, _... inrtr WS
"°siaf•"":'.eV� nq a So-,Io- SnnD...... C.hfnrm+ 92 IF3• 1714) 238-I8S5
February 16, 1978
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Tract Yo. 9351 - Residential Subdivision.. Off -site Improvements
Road Agreement (100% of estimated cost of improvements)
Centlemen:
This will set... as notice and agreement that San Diego Federal
Savings and Loea Association, a financial institution subject
to regulations by the State or Federal Government, holds in a
loan fund the amount of $148,000, pledging these funds to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga to meet the performance and completion
of off -site improvement on a subdivision of Coronado Land Company,
Inc. known as Tract 9351, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, according to that agreement dated December 28, 1977
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Owners as above stated.
The $148,000 will be.disbursed according to our Building and Loan
Agreement with the owner and only upon written approval
of a duly authorized representative of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Said funds to be disbursed after San Diego Federal
Savings and Loan Association has satisfied itself that the work
to be paid for has been performed; however, in the event that the
City determines the owner has failed to complete and /or pay for
the subdivision off -site improvements as required by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, the above sum shall be immediately available to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga to completeand /or pay for the cost of
said improvements.
020
Mr.,.a6.nn•.n.,eu.v,.. Ilnn,�ne,.r..an .............. a,. ......
L�n.„bilA'I�vr n. ;n.l a.n aAin ll.tl .Pin,luln.nnn .rl.,a \., II,. .'d n',VI
I •I .. in •.a l,. •1,�. \II, ..IAi i .i�le.`'i .. ,l\ I .•�Il •r .I'i „n. i., 11 .. ••
N�nll rviu. X,a��n.,na �le v.�m r.,. .nn....,... ,. „,a.. v,eA,i l „�.,..wl�i...�.�V...e..• .min „i .,o u. v,,., r.,, n..,,rm �� y..r
City of Rancho Cucamonga
February 16, 1978
Page Two
This agreement shall expire upon the disbursement to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga or upon acceptance by the City of that portion
of the aforementioned work secured by this instrument.
Sincerely,
SAN DIEGO FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
�L -
A. C. Bregan/
Senior Vice President
ACB /Lyn
This agreement approved CORONADO LAND COMPANY, INC.
By.
STEUFiV H. SANBEF�,H. P���
Date: FIam'� 28r 19
ACCEPTED:CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal corporation
Date: 2 - 11r - -U'
/ J• - L•ego�YSrIQI Celrinrrnd. Furudr Fnru.rrn11mr 1-- Wo
I_ WUSVCC1' Sin Diem Cihforme92183 •O1JI239 -1985
February 16, 1978
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Labor and Material - (502 of estimated cost of improvements)
Tract No. 9351 - Road Agreement
Gentlemen:
This will serve as notice and agreement that San Diego Federal
Savings and Loan Association, a financial institution subject to
regulations by the State or Federal Government, holds in a loan
fund the amount of $74,000, pledging these funds to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for the payment of labor and materials on a sub-
division of Coronado Land Company, Inc. known as Tract No. 9351,
County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to that
agreement dated December 28, 1977 between the City of Cucamonga
and the Owners as above stated.
The $74,000 will be disbursed according to our Building and Loan
Agreement with the owner and only upon written approval of a duly
authorized representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Said
funds to be disbursed after San Diego Federal Savings and Loan
Association has satisfied itself that the work to be paid for has
been performed; however, in the event that the City determines the
owner has failed to complete and /or pay for the subdivision off -site
improvements as required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the above
sum shall be immediately available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
to complete andbr pay for the cost of said improvements.
9-0-1
4r• n, I\�
IIn v Jrr • nrn .NJ.rl. l .a t l l lu. rrun\ 1 Mn'I. NIa.�l.r. rrI : li.r� l lrl . mla ra•a\�ri.r. 11 Ir Ma•e • 4.I1li.i�i,. r •...l .tI... r e1r rJ n Unl . r ir J � ne JV _
a \
�I �1 rIr.rF..�1•�I. .II'il it In \vrl.lrrl. rr \f, rl'u1.. 1'au rn. SaYea � � ������
Mnnll .nrvra M.r.n Milkrn n.H•aN.rrn n. rr .ir lrM n,rr \r. r..rn. nir.. \.rnl .r l..r.\.n,rr rirra \rn l.i.l.i. \.ri rr lr. r.l \n r•Irra� .I rri•rr.ulr II � L u �
rC �c
City of Rancho Cucamonga
February 16, 1978
Page Two
This agreement shall expire upon the disbursement to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga or six (6) months after the acceptance of the City of that
portion of the above - mentioned work secured by this agreement provided
no stop notices or other action has been taken in pursuance to the law
made and provided by persons supplying labor and materials to the work
of improvement above - described.
Sincerely,
SAN DIEGO FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
V C
A. C. Bregante_—
Senior Vice Presid4't
ACB /lyn
This agreement approved CORONADO LAND COMPANY, INC.
BY:_,
STL•'VEN H. SANBIItG, pAFSIDFNf
Date: FEBRUARY 28, 1978
ACCEPTED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,a Municipal corporation
By:�
By
Date: o2 "a F-- 7,5
w
CITY OF RAN X) CUDXNIQNGk
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980 U-IL_'
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Contract for the Collection of Special Assessment -
Landscape Maintenance District
Attached for Council execution is a contract required by the
County auditors office before they can collect assessments
adopted under the formation of Landscape Maintenance District
No.I
With execution, the City agrees to an additional $2.00 assess-
ment to each parcel to cover the costs of making collection.
The current fee being charged is $1.00 per parcel.
Further information is provided in the attached memo from the
auditors.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council approve the contract for
the Collection of Special Assessments for Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
on their behalf.
Respectfully submitted,
c�
LBH: j as
Attachments
w
CITY OF RANCH CM \MQNG\
S-IAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Signal Contract at Haven Avenue and Amber Lane
(Chaffey College)
This signal job was completed with no extra costs in May and
the test period has passed with the signals operating very
well.
Upon passage of the attached resolution, the Notice of Com-
pletion can he prepared and the final payment to the con-
tractor made.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:PAR:jaa
Attachment
• I
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -66
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE TRAFFIC
SIGNAL WORK AT HAVEN AVENUE AND AMBER LANE AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK.
WHEREAS, the traffic signal installation at the
intersection of Haven Avenue and Amber Lane (Chaffey College)
has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;
and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be
filed, certifying the work complete;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is
hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to file
a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of July,
1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
a7
CITY OF RANOiO Ci1CANMUA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement (Director
Review No. 80 -02)
��O CiCn.N�1
F g ?
7/2
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR
REVIEW NO. 80 -02.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
has for its consideration and Improvement Agreement executed on May 5, 1980.
by Wallner Tooling, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public
right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located at the northwest corner of 7th and Hyssop.
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to
Planning Commission, Director Review No. 80 -02; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by
good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor
is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, ADOPTED this day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
a�
1.11PRO',"EMENT AGREEMENT PACE
CIT`,' OF RANCHO C,:C,',ll,0NGA
CONSTRUCTION AND BOND ESTIMTE
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
(Attach to "Inspector's Copy")
DATE: Aaril 28. L980 PERMIT NO, COMPUTED BY Paul Rougeau
File Reference DR No. 80-02 - City Drawing No.s
NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement replace-
cent deposits.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIHATE
ITLN
QUANT ETY
UNIT
UNIT COST
AMOUNT
RWHU kW
S.F.
7,940
MISC
L.S.
A. C. 'A, EMENT
140
acV6
A. C.
L. F.
CI'P,S % i:l TT!:R
1'.
CWS'S ;M'TER /SPANDREL
S.F.
SID:::: A 1, K
S. F.
i)::ivE �ee!!OAC:IES - residential
500
S=P.
2.10
1.050
C::!'S!!17T) %F.(IIEGATE BASE
6.000
S. F.
720
I — TI: ;.' !,I ITJ TS
I
r., .
1,500.00
1.500
2" X RI.D :00D HEADER
I
T.. F.
S!,::;S
1
EA.
200
R. C. P.
L. F.
F'Illrc."? 1\SI::
FA.
7 1. j! T q 1 74: CT 1* IR E
EA
-SOO
qF
S40
200
_141111:,J: T,
LAN DS & 1� RR [GA r WN I
L.S.
C:7 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 15,850
f
41PROVEMI:NT AGRLEMLNT
Page Z
+. .L n'i: +lane within ex istiN; s[reet' ,'hall he di l igont ly pursued to caml.lc-
Linn; '1110 City .hall have the fil;hr to complc Le anv .nut all work in it,,
cvout of un.jl Li fw'i do lay in conPlet iun, and [n n•cnver all cost and
o::pruse incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful
moans.
B- 1'11e Lcvolnper shall he responsible for replaccaxnt, relocation, or re-
mnvnl of any coniPOnent of any irrigation water system in conflict with
[he required wort: to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner
of the water system,
9. The P.a'e ln] +er shall be respnne iblo for removal of all louse rock Ind other
drl•.ris frnri the public right of way resulting from work done on the adja-
cent property or within said right of way.
10' 'rhe Developer .hall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the
Community Development Director.
11.
The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee
complrUfmr of the terms Of this agleenirnt shall be subject to the approval
Of the City Attorney. The principal anonnt of said improvement security
shall be not less than the amount shown below:
lMF!%OVEMi!NT SECURITY SIBMi1'TED: Faithful Performance Bond
TYPE SURETY /AGENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
$16,000,
Material and Labor Bond $16,000.
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged with nli formalities required by law on the dates
set forth opposite their signatures:
DEVELOPER
BY: DACE:
BY: -
DATE:
Wll':: C:iS: DATE:
Cl'rY OF RANCk(l CUCAV OZA, CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
BY: _
- -- _, MAYOR
ArrEST: CITY CLERK
DATE:
INSPECTION' FEES
ITEM
QUANTITY
[UNIT
INI .OS
S AMOUNT I
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION —
of Construction Cost Estimate
L.S.
L.S.
I..S.
P N'F "i:':T rPT OR TRENCH
T..F
PAVi:!ENT REPLAC'EIIF.NT
STORE 'YO'ERi:U. IN RiCHT- OP -WAY
EA.
I. TOTAL INSPECTION FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
II. CWPACTIOA PEST FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$
III. 10': cosT1NG1�;c1Es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
IV. DESIGN FEES (10% of Total Construction Cost Estimate) . . . . $
TOTAL $ 15.850.
Faithful Performance Bond = $16,000
Naterial and Labor Bond = $16,000
Maintenance Bond = $
Cash Monumenting Deposit = $
RCE22E
3C2-
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
BOND NO. LOS- 050194
Premium $560.00
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and WALLNER TOOLING, INC.
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated , 19 , and identified as
project La v„ a0 -nV is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, We the principal and
B,11un\ TVCIIR \' E CO�IPLVY , d5 Surety, are held and
firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called
"City "), in the penal sum of Sixte Th usand dollar
Do lars ( 16.000.00 ) lawful
money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu-
tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants,, condi-
tions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration
thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be
kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec-
ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and
meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers,
agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation
shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in
full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec-
ifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its
obligations on this bond, and hereby waive notice of any
such change, extension of time, ration or addition to the
terms of the agreement or to t a k or to the specifications.
LABOR AND MATERIALMEN. BOND BOND NO. L05- 050194
Premium included in Performance
Bond.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and WALLNER TOOLING INC.
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated 19_, and identified as pro-
ject
is hereby zef erred to and made a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re-
quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file
a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15
(commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division. 3 of the
Civil Code of the State of California.
NOW', THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material-
men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure
in the sum of Sixteen Thousand Dollars
Dollars 16.000.00 , for materi
furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under
the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor,
that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the
amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought
upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof,
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed
as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit
brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be
and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in
any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here-
by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or ad-
dition.
I'; WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed
by the principal and surety above named, on MAY 16
19 90
WALLNER TOOLING, INC.
"'�
CITY OF RANCH CUCA1N"\UA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 5545 Replacement Bonds
The land being divided by Parcel Map No. 5545 is located on the
north side of Base Line west of Archibald for three lots.
The subject Parcel Map was approved by Council on March 5, 1980
along with bonds for the required street improvements. Subse-
quent design checks and conferences with property owners result-
ed in the elimination of a city requested cul -de -sac for Roberds
Court. Therefore, the bonding of the cul -de -sac could be elimi-
nated.
The original bonds are as follows:
Performance (Surety) $20,000.00
Labor S Material (Surety) $20,000.00
The replacement bonds are as follows:
Performance (Surety) $10,000.00
Labor s Material (Surety) $10,000.00
It is recommended that Council accept the replacement bonds, and
direct the City Clerk to return the original bonds.
Respectfully submitted,
LBtI : JLP1: j as
Attachments
3S
-TENTATIVE rAgCEL MAr Nc-D
I L
J." j
III I
VICINITY MAr
I L
17;
DAI,L' LINE .,e ._hi.....-PtOAP.-
-
4:
DEVELOPERS
INSURANCE COMPANY
5152 Katella Ave.
Los Alamitos, California 90720
(213) 594 -4659
(714) 527 -8262
June 17, 1980
Mr. John Martin
Assistant City Engineer
P. 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Re: Lewis Properties, Inc.
Parcel Map No. 5545
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Dear John,
At the request of Lewis Properties, Inc., we enclose
revised bonds in the amount of $10,000 to replace previous
bonds issued in the amount of $20,000.
Please arrange to-return the original bonds for cancel-
lation.
,Sincerely, �L'/
eat H. Brune
Vice President
Encl.
cc: Lewis Properties, Inc.
Quinlan Insurance, Inc.
AHB /cmp
y
CITY Of R,VX1 6
COM,', uUYTY CD /CcCPL1 Et+7 UEP f.
AM PM
7�oi9110it!iL�l i�f3tq� ��r
@0B
.37
BOND NO.
PREMIUM:
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and LEWIS PROPERTIES, INC.
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated FEBRUARY 27 19 80 , and identified as
project PARCEL MAP NO. 5545
is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
ag reement.
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and DEVELOPERS INSURANCE
COMPANY , as surety, are held and
firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called
"City "), in Lhe penal sum of ten thousand and 00 /100
money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and
truly to he made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu-
tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi-
tions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration
thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be
kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec-
ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and
meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers,
agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation
shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in
full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor., there shall be included
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the
1 agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder �or -the spec -
CALF. �U
ORANGE
100368
5200.00
LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and LEWIS PROPERTIES INC.
(hereinafter designated as "principal" have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated FEBRUARY 27 1980 . and identified as pro-
ject PARCEL MAP NO. 5545
is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and,
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re-
quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file
a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15
(commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the
Civil Code of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material -
men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure
in the sum of ten thousand and 00/100
Dollars 10,000.00 ), for materials
furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under
the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor,
that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the
amount hcreinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought
upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof,
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed
as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing
with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit
brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be
and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said
agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in
any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here-
by waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or ad-
dition.
IN „IT ?LESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed
by the principal and surety above named, on JUNE 13,
19 80
LEWIS PR PERTIES, INC. DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY
8Y • ' (GL� CG ` �� 6y:
QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONY:A
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Parcel Mao No. 5358, Acceptance of Map
Parcel Map No. 5358 is for the division of a one acre lot into
two lots on the east side of Archibald at the north city limits.
The map was submitted by Associated Engineers for Mr. Worth Hooper.
The street improvements were installed when Mr. Hooper built his
house under County approvals.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution
to authorize the City Engineer to forward the map for recording.
Respectfully submitted,
L�
LBH: JLM: jaa
Attachment
/01
7/_
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5358.
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5358)
WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 5358, submitted by
Associated Engineers and consisting 2 parcels, located at the north end
of Archibald on the east side being a division of Section 23 of Township
1 north, Range 7 west was approved by the City Engineer of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5358 is the final map of the
division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now
been met;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 5358 be and
the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to
present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
I '
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
I
TENTATIVE 7
PARCEL MAP NO. 5358
]. IIF W K TMST W.M, w T UCTTM 23 OE -) �JP
Rl" 74 w K.T. "11,10 IT W�7
my"m
WN,
f:ARCEL t--
•
PARCEL 2
0,
77"
CITY OF RAN IO CUCAMONCA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980 — 1077
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer 514
SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR - RELEASE OF BONDS
Tract 9366 - Located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Haven Avenue
OWNER: Valle Verde Ltd.
333 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 208
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $78,000.00
The road construction has been approved as being in accordance
with the road improvement plans and it Is recommended that
the City Council accept the roads.
�3
(:III'' I R \\'('.IfO('(T', \ \IO. \�(;,\
NIFINIORANDUiINl
DATE: June 13, 1980
TO: Harry Empey, Finance Director
FROM: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF T.O.F. BOND TOR VALLE VERDE, LTD.
The on -site subdivision sign has been removed, therefore, the cash deposit
is hereby authorized for release by the Planning Department to Valle Verde,
Ltd., 333 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 208, Beverly Hills, California 90212
(Attention: Howard Levin, Vice President).
Amount of
Tract No_ 'Lot No. Cash Deks it Receipt No. Purpose /Location _
9429 1 $250 032652 On -site subdivision sign
Dated 5/16/77 located at the N/W corner
of Haven 8 19th Street
Thanks'for your assistance; if you have any questions regarding this release,
please call.
Gary W. Richards
Code Enforcement Officer
GWR:jk '
IIE'NIORANDUAI
DATE: June 13, 1980
TO: Harry Empey, Director of Finance
FROM: Gary W. Richards, Code Enforcement Officer
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF T.O.P. BOND FOR CROWELL- LEVENTHAL, INC.
pork for the following tract has been completed and the bond is hereby
authorized by tGe Planning Department for release to Crowell - Leventhal,
Inc., 521 No. Mountain Avenue, Suite A, Upland, California 91786,
Gary Richards
Code Enforcement Officer
GR:jk
Amount of
Tract No.
,Lot No
Bond
Receiet No,
Purpose
9321
t 4
82,000
5621
Sales office /garage con-
.
version on Lot 4. N/W
•
corner Alta Loma Drive
and Sapphire.
9321
6
5 250
SacinnS Passbook
On -site Subdivision sign.
A010013429
Thank you
for your
assistance;
if you have any
questions regarding this bond
release.
Please call.
Gary Richards
Code Enforcement Officer
GR:jk
CV I I De mil detech -14rorn ell sopirp ae Met Write Aber. Thitline —!or H ... he s rlvs OINn Only
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES)
To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
1215 O Street LagAeorood for
Sacromento, Calif.95814 ^ere+ I nA a cs -dlvl�
IeonsucT storm. 11—e
The undersigned hereby applies for
licenses described as follower
1, TYPE($) OF LICENSE(S)
FILE NO.
^_f ^..:le Beer & idne
Applied under Sec. 24044 ❑
Effective Dote: iSallanee
FEE NO.
GEOGRAPHICAL
CODE 7.615
Dale
Issued
2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S)
Temp. Permit
Effective Dole:
PITHY is, Ri_,;_TCT FOOD £TOEEG. 1'a7
P-12 Licensee
3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S)
FEE
LIC.
TYPE
'
Sase File No. 23165 TI:G)•
07.1ednal Fee
S
CITY of RANC TRCUCA
4. Name of Basic.. CT 20
Pump N Tvntrsy Food £tD s
JUN 18 19�o
d
5. location of Business — Number and Street
9687 Baseline Road
AN
@anfto land Zip Caane
Tlge 91790 F >t.n dCZTjO.
RECEIPT NO. (_�•.I ��, TOTAL
76,40
6. If Premises Licensed, 7. Are Premises Inside
Shaw Tvae of Lirmr e
. never licnaed ON, Limits? Yea
8. (Railing Adt�C �ss (if different from 5)— Number and Street (To.,) Perm)
1. rd iH tX ' is a �egnndo, ( :1;j`(
9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic
Beveroge Control Act or regulations of the Department per-
taining to the Act?
11. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
12. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in omsole licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and
(b) that he will not violate or cause of permit to be vialated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of - LOD :'dlbfj,ea .. Date
undo sel 1p e1 tyre.... Mate I^rra whoa opwml berov, a.rrnn Md w (1) H. b The applimm, e m el IM seme
loft el the sport orpor mud the stet epplio duly ull:er utd yr —1. IM1ie ap llir lie ill h ll ;11 its, he MI eed the Iw .
eelna oppliee tut endnllne 11. a fle—F Md steer ash and all of IM ♦ Not made sun IMr a wes other rMn the eppliu
ex opplimnb MI loss, dirty ind ie l ti IM eppliten(1 se epplislel, buWnne le to modeled "nder r Is. bosun) IM Whuh this opp,ruion care;
to) IMI the I neler epplt(ati n or ws'.eed Ir nder made r lists, the payment of o loon w es lull,.. a opreem.. M end info mo • IMn n mly ("I
des,, pnndinp e�he dos, o -herb IM lr stet essou-lien n thled w'itA the aMarlmMl w e loses - nlohlieA a prlennee 1 r los a lode... ra Nvmlen, w I.
NBeDud seen. r 1 i,di o is Ire Il ar; x(11 'his He randlr ll plieelio 1 bs wilhdrnrn by ties, It, appGmnl er rheelk -we eil% ere neullinp liebilil, to
epos 1. i u Tl1Li�T n,l:. +l,.
14. APPLICANT os •_,
s s r , n. r
u ry -.Yr�
y, •
SIGN MERE ��Cf, +- /d •c � .. ... _ .... ..... .. ......
may: ..i ..edenaye r, :Cur -id7
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of - Date ..
unds pndq al perlwr, seas green when eipneN,e op ow, bellow, el end w s: III He is the Noless, w seeiTe sAl of Ihe ores nt teams..,
red in .M IsMOinp nomlo opplieolian, del, inlrwiled I make IM1ie bender repl'raelien e n sel ll: (1) .bets he e Mreby castes Mpnmlion t MrrMdl
ell iew:1 in rM an ••d lions(. NNribed Mlew end to rends w e IM pplieenl and Or IseNM inditoled on IM upper Porlian of *it popinmlien
lwm, it tuns Vml,roi eppresed by Ib Dinner: OI IFeI the l undo p prePoeed npmfo it m mere 1. wilds, Ise ogeese el u Iwo or le Is"',
epeemenl entered o mot ow, oilers, dMT "Wiry is daY hoM1O ..,for ri'lieriM is n Mud Firs the Depermele e, la seen s out lllh p
pMs a s for any m61e loot Lemke sr to ddroud s aq a nets le. pl Wee the .ends op,unie s mo, Ee wilhdwwn b, ei1Mr IM
applieenT or the lenses will, ere leonine Iiebilil, le the De serve ..,
16. Nome($) of Lis erseep) 17. Signoture(s) of LicervNI 18 . license Number(,)
aNINr
aMINK
A::: League of California Cities
AMIN
ONIN
Can roma Cn >s Sacramento, California
workTOg0he' June 3, 1980
ANNOUNCING,..,.
MAYORS AND COUNCIL.MEMBERS EXECUTIVE FORUM
Del Monte Hyatt House, Monterey
July 23 -25, 1980
The League is pleased to announce the Mayors and Council Members
Executive Forum. This meeting has a dual purpose:
- to provide elected officials with the opportunity to be
briefed on and discuss a number of key issues of interest
to cities
to enhance personal skills needed to effectively carry
out the duties of elected office.
The Forum will cover such major program and policy concerns as:
* the effect of present trends on cities
* housing
* economic development
* energy concerns of cities
* the future of the economy
* dealing with the press
* coping with stress
" time management for elected officials
Particular attention will be given to the importance of public sector -
private sector cooperation in the future. A more detailed program
outline is attached.
This meeting is devoted exclusively to the major program and policy
concerns of elected officials. It differs from the League's Annual
Conference in scope, depth and time devoted to current issues
(and is not concerned with policy development and implementation),
and from the New Mayors and Council Members Institute in that it is
much more than a general orientation to municipal procedures. The
intent of the Executive Form is to provide the unique opportunity
which elected officials have sought to help them better serve the
public. You are encouraged to attend.
1400N5TREET SAGRAMENT09S914 HOTEI CIAREMONT 3 'Es EL 05 0WILSRIREBLVD 5VE701 LOSANGELES 17
19151444819 1a5114 (21644 -4994
REGISTRATION
To facilitate the registration process, you are encouraged to register in advance and
a tan colored registration form is attached for this purpose. Should you wish to
register in advance please complete the ADVANCE REGISTRATION FORM and return it with a
check or money order (please no purchase orders) in the appropriate amount to the LEAGUE
OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, HOTEL CLAREMONT, BERKELEY, CA 94705. To process the Advance
Registration, payment of the registration fee must accompany this form.
At the bottom of the Registration Form is a questionnaire for those who plan to attend
the Forum but do not wish to register in advance. In order for the League to sake
appropriate arrangements for this meeting, it is necessary that we have an accurate
estimate of the number of officials who will be attending. If you expect to attend,
please fill out either the Advance Registration Section (return with payment) or the
Attendance Questionnaire Section, and return the entire form to the Berkeley office of
the League NOT LATER THAN FRIDAY, JULY 11, 1980.
Registration facilities will be available at the Executive Forum for those not registering
in advance. Registration facilities will open at 12:00 noon, July 23 in the lobby area
of the Del Monte Hyatt House.
REGISTRATION FF.E
The registration fee for the Mayors and Council Members Executive Forum is $65.00.
This fee is inclusive of the several programmed meal functions (at which presentations
are scheduled)and program materials and papers.
WrE1. RESERVATIONS
The Del Monte Hyatt House will provide meeting facilities for the Forum and will hold
a block of sleeping rooms until July 1. When making your hotel reservations please use
the white hotel reservation form attached which includes the room rates that will prevail
during the meeting. If you are planning to share a room with another city official,
only one form with both names indicated on it should be sent in.
For those planning to check in later than 4:00 p.m., a deposit in the amount of the first
night's rental,or a commitment by your city, will he required to guarantee your accommo-
dations. All reservations should be received by the Del Monte Hyatt House no later than
July 1, 1980. After July 1 rooms will be on a space available basis. Hotel reservations
should be returned directly to the Del Monte Hyatt House at the address indicated on the
form.
'iR.ANSWRTATION
The Del Monte Hyatt House is located at One Old Golf Course Road, off Highway 1 at the
Camino Aguaji.to off ramp in Monterey. The Del Monte Hyatt House is the first stop on
the airporter bus which meets all commercial flights. Cost is $2.75 per person.
SPOUSES
No special program or entertainment has been arranged for spouses. However, spouses are
cordially invited to attend program
/'] j
sessions and receptions.
-2-
The Executive Forum is designed to provide both briefings on current issues of concern
to elected officials and workshops in which you can learn skills useful in carrying out
the responsibilities of your office. You are urged, therefore, to plan to participate
in all the sessions from Wednesday afternoon through Friday lunch.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
MAYORS AND COUNCIL MIMBERS E(ECUfIVE FORUM
Del Monte Hyatt House, Monterey
PRELIMINARY PROGRAM
WEDNESDAY, JULY 23, 1980
12:00 noon Registration - Del Monte Hyatt House Lobby
2:00 p.m. Opening General Session
THE EFFECT OF THE FUTURE ON CITIES
(A DISCUSSION OF SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, DEMOGRAPHIC AND
POLITICAL TRENDS EFFECTING CITIES, WITH SUGGESTIONS
OF NOW CITIES CAN DEAL WITH THEM.)
ESSENTIAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE FUTURE: PUBLIC- PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
WAYNE THOMPSON, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT; DAYTON, HUDSON CORPORATION,
MINNEAPOLIS
5:30 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. Get Acquainted Reception (No -Host)
Evening Free
THURSDAY, JULY 24, 1980
9:00 a.m. Contemporary Issues Briefing
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
- Housing
- Commercial Revitalization
- Employment
l 3�-
THURSDAY, JULY 24, 1980 (continued)
10:30 a.m. Contemporary Issues Briefing
ENERGY ISSUES
- Judging Cost Benefits of Energy Conservation
- Community Energy Conservation
- Transportation and Conservation
12:15 p.m. General Luncheon
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMY
2:00 p.m. General Workshop
EFFECTIVE PRESS RELATIONS
(This session will consider the needs and preferences of the
various media, and how best to prepare for and conduct
sessions with reporters.)
5:00 P.M. - 6:30 p.m Informal Reception (NO -Host)
Evening Free
FRIDAY, JULY 25, 1980
9:00 a.m. General Workshop
LIVING WITH THE PRESSURES OF PUBLIC LIFE
- Coping with the stresses of public office
- Time management for elected officials
12:15 p.m. Concluding Luncheon
LEADERSHIP AND THE FUTURE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT
TOM BRADLEY, MAYOR, LOS ANGELES AND PRESIDENT, LEAGUE OF
CALIFORNIA CITIES
2:00 p.m. Adjourn
S'd
'4-
CITY OF RANa10 CUUA,1VMGA
SFAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Revision to Ordinance 28 and 58
�O CtICA.NOh^
r
r
C - p
s'
1977
At its May 7, 1980 meeting, the City Council reviewed requests
for the postponement of street improvements on a proposed
building and subdivision in the Etiwanda area. In both of
these cases and in previous instances, there have occurred
problems which preclude the construction of improvements at
the current time. Under current ordinances there are no
provisions for the postponement of improvements. This has
resulted in hardship to property owners.
The Staff feels that current Ordinances are overly restric-
tive and should be revised to allow the postponement of
improvements in certain instances. Where postponement is
allowed, the property owner will be required to enter into a
lien agreement guaranteeing construction at such time as
deemed necessary by the City Engineer.
At its June 18, 1980 meeting, the Council expressed concern
that provisions for postponement be more specifically defined
and that other cases receive direct Council review. Section 1
of Ordinance No. 28 -A has therefore been revised to include
four special conditions and allowing further appeal to the
Planning Commission and Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council approve Ordinances 28 -A
and 58-B.
Respectfully suubbmmiitted,
V
LBII: jaa
Attachments
ORDINANCE NO. 28 -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUB - SECTION (f) OF SECTION
2.12 OF ORDINANCE NO. 28 TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS
TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS BE CON-
STRUCTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF NINE (9) MONTHS FOLLOWING THE
RECORDATION OF A PARCEL MAP FOR EACH LOT UPON WHICH THERE
EXISTS A BUILDING OR OTHER USABLE STRUCTURE AT THE TIME
OF SUCH RECORDATION.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Sub - section (f) of Section 2.12 of Ordinance
No. 28 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"The City Council hereby finds that it is
necessary for reasons of public health and safety
that all off -site improvements be constructed
within a period of nine (9) months following
the recordation of a parcel map for each lot on
which there exists a building or other usable
structure at the time of such recordation. The
foregoing provisions not withstanding, the City
City Engineer may postpone the construction of
off -site improvements to such later time as he
shall, in his discretion, determine if he finds
that at the time of recordation one of the fol-
lowing conditions exist:
1. Improvements cannot be installed to the
ultimate street alignments without creating
a traffic hazard or potential maintenance
liability for the City.
2. Proper functioning of the improvements would
require the installation of storm drain
improvements not a part of the conditions
of approval of the subdivision.
3. Installation of improvements on a major
water carrying street would create potential
flooding problems to surrounding public and
private improvements.
4. No off -site improvements exist contiguous
to the improved parcel being created and no
buildable lot will be created by the subdivision.
5;2
-2
Ordinance No, 28 -A
Where the Planning Commission and City Council
find that such other circumstances exist
which would make postponement beneficial to
the health, safety, and welfare of the City:
"No postponement of construction shall
be granted by the City Engineer unless the
owner of the subject parcel shall agree in
writing to construct required off -site improve-
ments at such future time as shall then or
thereafter be determined by the City Engineer
which said contract shall create a lien upon
the property to be divided as security for
the performance of said agreement. Any such
written contract and lien agreement shall
be recorded with 'the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County immediately subsequent
to the recordation of the subject parcel map. ".
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shill attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same
to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once
in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
5,3
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 58 -B
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 58 TO PER-
MIT THE USE OF LIEN AGREEMENTS AS SECURITY FOR
THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 6 of Ordinance No. 58 is hereby amended
to read as follows:
"Section 6. Construction of Public Improvements -
Prer_equisite to Approval of the Build-
ing official.
"(a) Except as provided in Section 5, the
Building Official shall deny issuance of a building
permit, or deny approval for occupancy or deny final
approval and acceptance for public utility connec-
tions to any building or parking lot until required
full frontage improvements exist, or are constructed
or their construction is guaranteed by an executed
agreement and cash money deposited with the City in
a sum approved by the City Engineer based upon one -
and- one -half (1 -1 /2) times the estimated cost of
construction.
"(b) In the event construction of full front-
age improvements is not required to be completed
within six (6) months after the issuance of the build-
ing permit, the City Engineer may, at his option, re-
quire that a lien upon the property to be improved
be created by contract between the owner and the City
as security for the performance by the owner of the
construction guarantee agreement instead of a cash
deposit. In the event a lien agreement is required
pursuant to this section, no building permit shall
issue until it is recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County. ".
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passace, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general
circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
1980. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: /f�
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
BY: Michael Vairin, Associate Planner
.GAO 1C9
s
F
L
1977
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - C. H. BRUBAKER -
A request for change of zone from R- 1- 20,000 to R- 1- 10,000 or more
restrictive zoning for property located on the southeast corner of
Banyan and Amethyst Streets.
BACKGROUND: The applicant has submitted an application requesting a change
of zone from R- 1- 20,000 (single family residential on minimum 20,000 square
foot lots) to R- 1- 10,000 (single family residential on minimum 10,000 square
foot lots) for approximately 10 acres of land located on the southeast cor-
ner of Banyan and Amethyst streets (Exhibit "A. "), The Planning Commission,
at its meeting of May 14, 1980 held a public hearing to consider such re-
quest. Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission minutes of
May 14, 1980. The Planning Commission action from that meeting was the
adoption of Resolution No. 80 -27, which recommended approval of the zone
change and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council.
Exhibit "B" indicates the precise location of the subject site and the sur-
rounding land uses, Following is a summary of the zoning and land use of
the property adjacent to the subject site:
ZONING LAND USE
North R -1- 20,000 Single Family Residential
South R -1- 15,000 Water Reservoir and Single Family
Residential
East R -1- 20,000 An Inactive Chicken Ranch
West R -1- 12,000 Single Family Residential
The interim land use element of the General Plan designates the area as low
density residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). Banyan Street has become
the approximate dividing line between one -half acre zoning on the north and
smaller lots on the south. The General Plan clearly indicates very low
density on the north side and low density on the south side of Banyan,
In the past, the County's zoning practice in these areas was to transition
properties from 20,000 square feet on the north side of Banyan to progres-
sively smaller lots on the south side. This practice created a boundary
line between the animal related uses and non animal related uses. This
technique was good, however, the County established numerous residential
densities by applying minimum lot standards at various sizes ranging from
7,200 square feet up to 20,000 square feet. The proposed zoning ordinance
is recommending four R -1 zone designations; R- 1- 40,000, R- 1- 20,000, R -1-
10,000, and R -1- 7,200.
6�5
July 2, 1980
Zone Change No. 80 -07
Page Two
At the Planning Commission hearing, two residents in the immediate area of
the subject site spoke in opposition to the zone change and felt that ul-
timate development of this area would create complaints against the property
they own which presently permit animal related uses. The Planning Commission
expressed that this zoning would not remove the right for them to maintain
animals on their site. However, if animals were not being maintained pro-
perly, then appropriate action would be taken by the City.
Part I of the Initial Study which was prepared by the applicant is attached
for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has
found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this
project. The Planning Commission has concurred with such findings and has
recommended the adoption of a Negative Declaration to the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: If, after review of the above information and completion
of the public hearing, the City Council concurs with the above analysis and
recommendation of the Planning Commission, then an ordinance is attached
for your review and consideration which approves the zone change request
and issues a Negative Declaration.
Respectful ly:su itted,
JACK LAM, Director of
Community Development
JL:MV;jk
Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map
Exhibit "B" Site Plan
Planning Commission Minutes of May 14, 1980
Planning Commission Resolution No, 80 -27
Part I, Initial Study
Adopting Ordinance
MY
-L-i
BANYAN ST
T
4F2IGOT AYE
FFn
IZ - I - ZC> - T
5UF565CT
F'P,OPEIP-T Y
I
+
5�4Lc :S-frSGT
NORTH
CITY OF CA. A 17
RAINCI K) CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION IN IIBIT: S(",\ 1.1::
57
PEA/- &,-AAF�
N
B,4A✓YW
r
757-
,v 00 cz-D loo
TOT ACRES
I26,17- 111A,
0Z ?-,:5 ro "c
STREET
00,
/V Wn 4FA 5 EllEV 7-��l
"TH
CITY (A' 0•17.7
RAINCI K) CUCANK)MA Tll'[.I:; Sill
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: Scm,u
N
CITY OF RANCHO CUI:fJ!()NGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project will have no
environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
`3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJECT TITLE: Zone change to R-1- 10,000
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: C.H. Brubaker
c/o Doug Hone, 7333 Hellman Ave„ Rancho Cucamonga- 7—
a i
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Hone F Associates,
7333 Hellman Ave, Rancho Cucarunga, Calif 91730 989 -1767
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS Ar:D ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)
S/E corner Amethyst St and recorded tract 9444 - abandoned Ranyon
Street 1062 - 401 -11
LIST 011W R PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS:
I -1
67
r
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Chanqe current zone from R -1- 20,000
to R -1- 10.000 to conform with the General Plan.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS,. IF ANY: 10 +1 acres located SE corner
f PanWan cr + and a f•ht c-. th f rri Tr ,,t 9444 Rancho
n r manna
DESCRIBE THE EN17TR0N "-.`TAr, Si;T7T;7G OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLPDING INFOR:I'MO T ON TOFOC,PAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,
ANINALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEbIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROLTIDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
Existina Lemon Grove planted approximately 60 trees to the acre.
are
r ,Ifivat inn of the Grove - Eucaly t s -Blue Gum variety Stands on Vie
ME
the MO -water line and property. The easterly property contains a
commercial Lcmon Grove with a not a part house located at the north
east comer of the subject property.
Is the proioct, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumv lot ivc actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
I-S
/ D
f
WILL T-1-11C PR0,71 ".CT:
YtiS NO
X I. create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
R 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
_x 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?
X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
Potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
'Explanation of any YES answers above:
Itdrn 4 existing zone R -1- 20,000 - the inter
IMPJRT.\:rr: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CP.RTIPICATiON: I hereby cortify that the statements furnished
Above and in the attached m;hihitn present the data and
informiti. on required for this initial eva Llation to tilt
boat of r:� ahiliCt', and thnt the faCtr•, s:tatcments, and
inforn >.ti.nn prcnented are true anti correct to the best of
my lcn�•:1^dgc an:! belicc I further understand tM t
additinnnl information mny 1,o required to be submitted
before nn advquclt.e evaulation can be made by the Devalopr,ont
Revirw Conun itfcc.
Date<VL'Il ; /yd 2' Signal•urc
I36r
Title _�4 rt yr,e l--
Co. ^..minsi ^n' .,si,n .'era'ling V! YOTMOd 'Sine Ixtorrion for Director
Review flo. 78-5 _ Mobil nil.
It was moved by Tol.stoy, 5ecnmied by Oar'•ie, oerriwt unaniro�asly, to grant an ad-
ditional six -nonth extensian with the n: ^ -i -n that, sh ^ui•1 construction not b =gin
within that, Time, t.hc SLOW in to be ranod, tanks filled nr removed, in accord-
ance with the Fire and Uniform Bulldinr, Cages.
Y W R • f
FUBLIC IIEAARIt1;5
ilEO,�PIVp, DECURA'VI,'N ANU 7,0NE CRA70E FiO. ?n-,DT - C. II. ianq?P.i:Fb - ch:inr_e from
11- 1- 10,CDO for property located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Amethyst
Streets.
Mia mel 'Jiarin, Associn•e 119nner, revie•-el the ._'aff _ .ff rercr. -ended
c rr r,,:.r `.,
that the Commis -ior s,?,.pt pe=cMi^u 2. 9n-s7 air.rovinr. ^.r,ne C!tanr,e llo. 80 -07
with the iss•rulce A n thrntire pcclnrntirn to the City lounoil.
There -:as ncne'Crmmissi;a: di^ ^assirm r ^rarl:':,r the realir,nnent of Panyan Street near
Ameitiyst as a result cf the rrorxed devel.oi.ment.
Chairman n"empel•droned the public he'arinr..
Gtr. hove lionc,. Hone Assoe fates, ir.c., representing t.h^ nrrlicant, C. H. Brubaker,
explained the Tons" for the requested change to 10,000 square foot lots in this
wren. He Parther saplained that the proputy to be developed would be properly
buffereii to ensue 'compatability with exi:tinr propertios with animals.
Mr. °iced Herman, 01:64 a,r ✓ ^.n, Rr:nrl;., r..ic,..m ^ngs, UP 11111 'h^ 1111 ,101 and es-
n•.^r"l vxicmn thn+ c n =r�aller let SUP t!vut pr rvn'.ly COOS umrld
Fre ^ipif.nt.e corr,plainf .^f.,�m•�r; ;!,arc re =id ^::fa about smalls frr+m idja,•ont animal
pmlerties. Q% Herman nlsr Adiczte•t 'hn'. he felt the exj sflnr,, w✓nr line would
b^ n better rlace t.0 star'. 10,001 square foot lots than whit was proposed by the
dmcl.oper.
61r, Al )lawns, resi•lrnt on Banyan Prnet expressed his concern tl =f, down si,:inr
lots in this nrea wotlld result in prrhlsm:- for current resi'lants who have animal
property. !io also riled that inorensed density would repnit with lot size changes.
C ^va.ission Mammon mooed rclnlive to Wt sizes to preclude a "cookie. cutter"
J016
Ili,rc beiur, no f,n.rgel' rennrmtn Fr'n the nud lone rhaiirari liem.pel closed the
public henrinr.
l. . .. .,r.t..! l:v ^Qt:, riC! tr,��i, -.. ;:: :pr:'ie
.n,.,:,1't'ian I, . 'P• ^ - "7. .i'.i'i ., '!r:. ':Ir i.r qr. 'i.. Nicers in this
pool ,Sel trn,:t, be uv!e w., +f -'he vd,i �w•'nt. animal pr,jort ies.
F "loon inr �'arnis•:i..n 'I: m;• _ _ l6, 1080
l_V
RUOLM ION to. 80 -27
A RE31 IAII ION OF 'I'IIF: RAII(:IIn fI0CAM0!:aA PI.ANNIL'G
COMMISSION RE otlmi :0N1N+: APPROVAL OF "LONG CIIKV;IS
NO, 80 -0, RE(ILICSI'ING A CHANGE. IN lilE. 20NIM! FROM
R- 1- 20,000 10 R -1- 10,000 FOR 10 ACRES (IF LAND
L(1(1A'I'IiP ON Ill[, SOP'1' EASE CORNER OF MNIAN AND
AMEl'10'ST - ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. t062 -401 -II
MiCRE,tS, on the 2.1 clay of :April, 1990, In application was filed
and accepted vn the above described project: and
WHEREAS, nn the 15 day of May, I09n, till, Pf:nmiog Cnmmissi•m held
n d,ilp advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 55854 of the California
Government Cade.
SCCf_ION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the f0l lowing findinr,s:
I. 'Ih.lt 1.b:• soil jrrt Pnroerit, ,s "ital•IC fer the n<es
pct nil ted in [ho proposer, o.rnv in teims of access,
sire, and crncpatibi li Ly with existing land use in
the surrounding nrca;
2, The prop, +se(1 one change wnold not hn`:e .significant
impact on the environment ner the surrounding pro-
perties; and
i• 1' fit, L [hc propos od r11nc ehn ago is in con fornnnce wi th
tho propnsvd General Plan.
5RC'fl_ON 2 Vie Rancho Cuvnmomul Plann!ne C'nmmission has found
that this project will not create a s z-1 if i('nnt Ij er so I^,Pavt
on the enol I"nnenl Ind reci +mi•.u•nds i,qu.I acv of a Nvg.lt ive Doc Ia r-
at ion un Mav 14, 1980.
NON, THERE PORT, BE 1'1 RESOLVED:
I. "IhaL 11111111.1111 1111 Section 65950 to (15855 of 1. 1112
Californfa Government Code, that till, FInnning
Colnmis':1011 of the Citc of Rancho Oucarongn hereby
recommen(IS Ipproval 1111 the 14 day of flay, 1980,
Y.one Change No. 80 -07,
2. 1'!0• I'I nml111I. llee,; ^i psi an he I h, r CI'ITI•Id' t I I II Lhe
city C„nnrif nppraec mvl adapt 7.one Chanl;e N 80 -07.
3. II''I n C, it bled, r. "f till, II' I,:i,n ,.I r, kited
m,nrri.11 !u n•hv Woph�d by the I'Innein;; C.nmmi;ainn
,hull hr Ie'wat'd'd Lo the Cil.v Cmnvvil.
AITTOCI'll AN11 AID0PfI11 Illlj 11 VAP Ill MA"I, 11180,
63
ATTST:,
ots , ,I. '), , I i I I ;1•s, r, ,
ol tnT ,Laming umnissioit
LM, Smaq my w "fx Fl•inninw, " t1i, ,! Rrnmhn
i, hereby -,! f j ; t !,,,t the f i 'TI Ws Nly atilt
pi,sril, and t,i),, 7-riflr,51on of
no City nr Hwoly Gunn wn if i r=!a, •ti,ir ,' fit, Plruitiinr. t'onfrfis-
ri"t, 11,1d " th- Oth hy or ?':,y, ll� !I�p f.,11"WIT,-
t" At:
CC; ; -, , - i 1, 'Y r!
I
ORDINANCE NO. 113
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL kQ THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
1062 - 401 -11 FROM R -1- 20,000 TO R -1- 10,000 LOCATED ON THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BANYAN AND AMETHYST STREETS.
The City Council of the City of.Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing
held in the time and manner prescribed by law,
recommends the rezoning of the property herein-
after described, and this City Council has held
a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed
by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the
General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environ-
mental impact as provided in the Negative
Declaration filed herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly. -
R -1- 20,000 (single family residential on minimum 20,000 sq.
ft. lots) to R- 1- 10,000 (single family residential on minimum
10,000 sq. ft. lots).
Said Property is located on the southeast corner of Amethyst
and Banyan Streets known as Assessor's Parcel Number 1062-
401-11
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADj1PTED this day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip 6. Schlosser, Mayor
C"Siirenid- 'WF"S?; ?rmAh t 'Terr— �[.,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC \
S1AFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980 F�1
u
TO: City Council and City Manager 1977
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Establishing Special Drainage Impact Area
Attached for Council execution is an Ordinance designating the
area north of the Santa Fe Railroad to Arrow Route between
Milliken Avenue and Haven Avenue as a Special Drainage Impact
Area. The Ordinance requires that prior to the issuance of a
Building Permit within the area, the applicant will be required
to submit a detailed hydrologic study demonstrating the extent
of drainage impact and proposed mitigation measures. The Ordi-
nance requires that the City Engineer make findings that the
project will not adversely impact the drainage situation in the
area. Where temporary retention basins are utilized as a
mitigation measure, a maintenance agreement will be required
and a minimum $2,000 security deposit posted.
The Ordinance also modifies the drainage fee Ordinance No. 75
to require full payment of drainage fees for the developed area
on any parcel prior to issuance of a building permit for any
additions. This is accomplished by deleting Section 9 (c)(3)
from Ordinance No. 75 (see attached copy) for the impact area
only.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No.
111 establishing the area north of the Santa Fe Railroad to
Arrow Route between the alignment of Milliken Avenue and Haven
Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
DB}a: jaa
Attachments
V -1—
11
ORDINANCE NO. 111
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL DRAINAGE
IMPACT ZONE NORTH OF THE SANTA FE RAILROAD TO ARROW ROUTE
BETWEEN HAVEN AND MILLIKEN AVENUES, AND REQUIRING DETAILED
ENGINEERING STUDIES AND MITIGATION MEASURES IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose
In recognition of the existence of unique drainage
problem creating potential hazards to public health, safety, and property,
the City Council deems it appropriate to establish that portion of the
City bounded by:
"The Santa Fe Railroad on the south, Arrow Route on the north,
Haven Avenue on the west, and the alignment of Milliken Avenue on
the east"
as a Special Drainage Impact Zone requiring special engineering studies
and mitigations measures as a condition of the issuance of a building
permit.
SECTION 2: Drainage Study Requirements
The City Council finds that prior to the issuance of
a Building permit within the Special Impact Zone boundary described in
Section 1, the applicant is hereby required to submit for approval of
the City Engineer a comprehensive hydrology study prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer in the State of California. This study shall contain the
following:
Analysis of existing drainage patterns and runoff quantities
on the site.
2. The existing ultimate discharge point of site runoff and the
general downstream path of runoff.
3. The proposed drainage patterns and increases in runoff quantities
generated by site development.
4. Proposed mitigation measures to prevent the discharge of
increased storm runoff from the site including proposed
construction of master plan facilities sufficient to mitigate
downstream damage.
5. Any other information required by the City Engineer to determine
the full drainage impacts of the proposed development.
7
Ordinance No. 111
Page 2
SECTION 3: Findings Required for Building Permit Issuance
No building permit shall be issued for a structure
within the Special Impact Zone unless the City Engineer has made the
following findings:
1. That the proposed project will not increase storm runoff from
the site except where Mesier,t4wn. Drainage facilities exist to
accept said runoff.�'`�' ^�'
2. That the project by reasons of low -flow non -storm related
water will not create a public nuisance.
3. That the project will not divert or concentrate flows in such
a manner as to adversely effect downstream properties. To
insure this finding, the City Engineer may require a drainage
acceptance letter or easement from the adjacent downstream
property.
4. That where on -site retention facilities have been proposed a
sufficient maintenance contract has been executed and security
posted to insure proper maintenance of said facility. Minimum
security for maintenance shall be $2,000 or such other higher
amount as set by the City Council upon recommendation of the
City Engineer.
5. That all facilities proposed are in conformance with City
standards for design and construction.
These findings will be made subject to conditions established
by the City Engineer based upon the findings of the approved
Drainage Study.
SECTION 4: Security for Construction of Required drainage
improvements
Where the findings required by Section 3 are
based on conditions requiring the construction of drainaqe
improvements, no building permit shall be issued until an agreement and
bonds, letters of credit, cash deposit, or other acceptable form of
security have been posted and accepted by the City Council to insure the
construction of required facilities.
SECTION 5: Drainage Fee Provisions
(a) Where a building permit is sought for in
addition to existing development within the Special Drainage Zone,
the building permit shall not be issued until drainage
fees under the provisions of City Ordinances have been paid for the
entire developed area of the site. The developed area shall be as
defined in Section 4(c)(2) of Ordinance 15 and shall be determined by
the Building Official.
M
W � a No. 111
Page 3
(b) Within the Special Drainage Impact Zone, the
provision of Section 3(c)(3) of Ordinance No. 75 shall not apply.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Repprt, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk
65;
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
nRIlINAN:a: NO. 75
,V; rltlllNANCC OF Till'. CITY ('OFI:CII. OF THE CI'f'f OF R:L:CIIn
QI'CAII(INCA, CAI,IF(IICITA, PROVIDE:(; FOR THE FSTABLISHIIENT
Of A PIt.AINA6F. PLAN ASII Till: LSTABI.IsiDli.vr OF DMIAAW'. FF:I:S
IN CONrfcrnls Te C.ltc.:rrll.
The Cite Council of the City of Rancho Cucall1rogn. California,
do,, ":'.rill as lollows:
�� SI_C'rl(1!; is Statcntrnt of Intent and Pu rI)nac.
The City of Rancho Curamopc;j is seriously affected by surface
and storm waters and the cOntinunl .subdivision and development of property
within the City ill's placed a serious demnnd on existing facilities which
h.rndle surface and storm waters. In order to plan and develop drainage
facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters and to provide an
equituhlo mnnner for t.ho apportionment of the cost of the development of
such far.ilitios, the City Council does determine that a drainage plan
most be adopted and a drainage fee established to provide funds to be
used for the construction of the facilities described in the drainage
plan.
SF.C'rl(?9 2 Drainage Plan and Local Area.
Tho comprehonsivr storm drain plans numbers 1 and 2, the index
thcret•o and tl:•c appropriate plats sheets for the area lying within the
Cit., Limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, together with construction
costs and other related material, which colnprehensivo storm drain plans
were prepared by the San Bernardino Countv Flood Control District, are
hore6v fnnnd and declarer) to he the drainage plan for the Citv of Rancho
Cucxnongn. For the purposes of this Ordinance, planned drainage facilities
,'null mean drainage contained within the drainage plan. The City Council
('Inds that drainage problems are approximately of equal magnitude in all
an•a:: of the City, and declares that for the purposes of this Ordinance,
all areas of the City shall constitute one local drainage area.
SECTION 7: Pavr:ent of Fees.
(a) As a condition of approvnl of a final nap, a parcel map,
thu ,liver of a porvol mop, dirr.ctor reviews, site approvnl, location
and dn•: clopmon r. pLm• condition,11 use permit, or the issuance of n
huildrne Perri t, the Cit•; :hall re•.p,ire the pa ?rims of a fee as is
he mnftor Provided for the purposes of dofrayi ng the a,aual or estimated
rest ni r,•nst r::rc in }; pl:nnwd draitlnv.e facilities for the removal of
surfer... ... .I stun ttntors from ill,' 1,11,11 drninnge area. Tile Cit•: Council
find:, thn:'devolopmant of prnporty within the local drainage area will
require con at rnr.inn +.f thn Fncilitias described in the drainage plan,
nod char the fees are fairly apportioned on the basis of benefits conferred
I'M the r.roperry in rho local drainagn nron and ,, the need for such
fac.litlnr cn•nt cd by Ulu proposed division or dovelopm.nnt of property
in the local drainngo area. Thy City Council furth,•r Find., that the fee
as to anv prnporty dogs not exrood tlir pro r".13 share of thy nlannnt of
till, total actual or estimated cost of all facilities pursuant to the
drainage plan which would he assns:+nhlo on anv parcel (`�f� roperty if
pe
such costs were apportioned on a r acre basin. /
(b) Fees required to be paid by this Ordinance shall he
paid at the time of issomnco of a building permit.
;rcrrW: c: mm,nnt df Fee.
(a) The fee regnired to be pnid by Lhis Ordinance is $25.00
per 1 /10001 of nn acre or fraction Choreof.
(h) I:x,VL as o[harrise provided in this Ordinance the.
foe shn11 he based on the anon of the entire parcel with respacL to
which [ho hnilding permit is issued.
7/
!c) If the paned :pith rn•s prat to whirl, the hoildlnz Perm Ic
iv i•. +n�ui (. I.11;Qr than one sic re, the• foo shn It be hdn(•d nn t 11 grouter
W
In arta of one acre; or
(1) 'P ho area of the dvvr loped pn rt ion of tl.•e pa rcol. As
n:o:l in thin Ord inana -e, tilt phrase "area of the developed portion of the
P;11 :"I" n;,•,•.; the area of [hat portion of the na re of Ivi ng within a
sin -.:Io roctan;;lo which encloses all improvemon[s, l:uiJ sc ape( aronu,
storn:;e .orcas, p.rrking areas, required access and required setback
lines.
_(7) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4(c) (2)
Of this Ordinance, the fee sha L1 not be based upon that portion of the
area oC [he developed portion of the parcel which was evelope p� scar to
the gfCective Oat, of this Ordinance and which remains unchan ,ed roil(ed,
hnwevrr, L'iat chic exec ption shall no[ apply once the to CaL area of
nd:l it ion:, rn strut tures= or new structure:, construe red after the of fee tive
Jn[o n[ tht_ Ordinance_esceeds fif Cy E—( 507) of tha
e rea o ffie
strue n,rns on the parcel which existed on the effective date of this
(d) The amount of the fee and the area for which the fee
shall be consid Ared paid shall be determined by the building official.
SECTION 5:' Deposit and Utilization of Fee.
The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance shall be deposited
in a "planned drainage facilities fund" and shall be expended solely for
th:+ construction of refmhurgement for the construction of drainage
facilities pursuant to the drainage plan or to reimburse the Citv oft
the costs of engineering planning and administrative services to establish,
do::ign and construct the plan and facilities up to twenty -five percent
(25:;). Initial funds collected mnv be utilized for specific planning
and engineering studies as designated by resolution of the City Council.
SECTION 6: Execeptions.
Drainage fees shall not be required as a condition of the
issuance of a building permit for:
(a) Alterations;
(h) reconstruction;
(c) au addition to a single fancily residence when the
add.dtion does not exceed 650 squire feet in area;
(d) construction of garages, carports, storage buildings,
patio covers, swir,.minv. pools, spas, and similar structures, accessory to
., vi m;(c family residence.
7(�P,
SECTION 7: Single Drainage Fee Payment.
No portion of a parcel shall be subject to payment of a drainage
reu more than once. If a drainage fee has been previously paid with
resport to a parcel, or portion thereof, credit shall be given for such
prior panitint, and a proper apportionment shall be made, toward any fee
payment required by this Ordinance. '
SECTION 8: Construction by Developer and Reimbursement
ldh onever the construction of planned drainage facilities is L_
ncct,.in I'ur the proper drainage of a vuhd ivis Wit, 6L City may require
he
t :nhd iv ider to const runt such (ar it it ies with credit being given by
tha Cl tv [,ward any fee payment required by this Ordinance. II the cost
n1 such cu11LruCLiOn exoovds tho fee which w,uld otherwise he p.n ahle
with rv.pvct to the subdivision, the City Council mav, at its discretion,
vutrr into a rcimhursrmcnt alereemont with the developer. In the event a
257
N5,: 3
rcir „ +�n'eom,:nt a9rooccnt is entered into, reimbursement shall be made
only after the t'eo required 69 this ordinnnco is collected in connection
Keith .i su6divisinn or development an othor property in Lhe area encompnvsed
T.,: thr roimhurscnont boundaries doscrihod in thr reimbursement agroement.
h,• has1s of re in hu ry em, ot shot L'be the developer's actual Cost of
construction of the p unnod drainage fac it it iee. The term of n reimbursement
t,4rcrmrnl shall not e::cm•d ten (10) years.
SECTION 9: Severability.
If an, section, sub - section, SUh-diViSiOn, paraeraph, sentence,
ciaacs, or phrase in this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any
reason held to he invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not
affaet the ¢nlidity of the remaining sections or portions of this Ordinance
or any partThereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would
hovo ra:;sed each section, sub- section, suh- division, paragraph, sentence,
clau!:o or phrase of this Ordinance irrespecitve of the fact that any
one of more section, sub- section., sub- divisiono, paragraphs, sentences,
cl.tn5e.s. or phrases may be declared invalid of unconstitutional.
SECTION 10: The Mayor shall sign this Odinance and the City
Clerk 'shall attest to the .same, and the Citv Clerk shall cause the same
to bo puhlished within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least
once in Tho Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published
in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cuc.amanga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of April, 1979.
AYES: Mikels, Palombo, West, Frost
NOES: None
ABSENT: Srh lesser
I
ATTEST:
CITY OF RANCM CIJCANIC(Nrk
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 2, 1980 CL
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Proposed Increase for Industrial Storm Drain Fee
Attached for Council execution is an Ordinance to adopt the
revised industrial area storm drain plan for the area bounded
by the City limits on the South, Foothill Boulevard on the
North and lying between Deer and Day Creeks. In addition,
the Ordinance will raise storm drain fees within the area from
$2,500 /acre to $4,600 /acre. The raised fee reflects actual
increases in the cost of providing the proposed system.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council adopt Ordinance 112 adopting
the Industrial Area Master Plan of Drainage and establishing
a fee of $4,500 per acre with the drainage area.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:jaa
Attachments
ORDINANCE N0, 112
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL
DRAINAGE AREA, MAKING ORDINANCE NO. 75 APPLICABLE THERETO,
AND ESTABLISHING A DRAINAGE FEE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose.
Since the adoption of Ordinance No. 75, the
City has caused additional drainage studies to be made within the City.
These studies have now identified certain areas within the City where
special drainage problems exist, and with respect to which the cost of
planned drainage facilities to provide proper drainage are higher, on a
per acre basis, than in the rest of the City. Accordingly, the City
Council deems it appropriate to establish that portion of the City
Bounded by:
"Deer Creek on the west, Day Creek on the east, the south City
limit, and on the north by the Centerline of Foothill Boulevard"
as a separate local drainage area to be known as the "industrial local
drainage area ". The City Council further finds and determines that the
remaining territory of the City shall remain one local drainage area
subject to all of the provisions of Ordinance No. 75,
SECTION 2: Drainage Plan and Industrial Local Draina e
Area.
The comprehensive storm drain plans, the index
thereto and the appropriate plan sheets for the industrial local drainage
area together with construction costs and other related material, which
documents entitled Industrial Area Drainage Master Plan prepared by
L.D. King are hereby found and declared to be the drainage plan for the
industrial local drainage area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For the
purposes of this Ordinance, planned drainage facilities shall mean
drainage facilities contained within the drainage plan. The City Council
finds that drainage problems are approximately of equal magnitude in all
areas of the industrial local drainage area.
SECTION 3: Provisions of Ordinance No. 75 Made Applicable.
All provisions of Ordinance No. 75, except the
provisions of Section 2 thereof, and except as otherwise amended by this
Ordinance, shall he applicable to the industrial local drainage area.
Where the context so requires, the term "local drainage area" shall
include the "industrial local drainage area ".
6? /4
VII � No.. 112
Page 2
SECTION 4: Amount of Fee.
(a) The fee required to be paid by this
Ordinance with respect to land within the industrial local drainage
area is $46 per one hundreth (100th) of an acre or fraction thereof.
SECTION 5: Exemptions.
No fee shall be required pursuant to this
Ordinance for any land within the industrial local drainage area upon
which there has been levied an assessment in connection with an
improvement district formed on or after the effective date of this
Ordinance for the construction of drainage facilities.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteeen (15)
days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newpaper
of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California,
and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
Council in executive session, together with the reasons why such pay
adjustment is to be made and how such individual employee's personal
performance and qualifications warrant such pay rate change.
SECTION 2. The City Manager shall be covered by said rules and
regulations as they may apply to perquisites, fringe benefits and
working conditions except that the City Council may enter into an
employment agreement with the City Manager to expand, clarify, supple-
ment, define and restrict such benefits as it shall deem appropriate,
including, but not limited to the following:
(a) termination pay,
(b) personal use of city vehicle,
(c) City -paid deferred compensation at a percentage of base
pay greater than that provided to other management
employees,
(d) additional sick leave, vacation and conference attendance,
(e) revised working hours in recognition of the exigencies of
the position,
(f) meritorious and longevity pay and bonuses,
(g) supplemental retirement benefits, and
(h) other benefits and perquisites peculiar to the office of
City Manager.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be uncon-
stitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each
section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase thereof,
irrespective of the.fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 4. All ordinances and resolutions encompassing personnel
matters in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. More specifically,
resolutions 79 -48 and 79 -49 are hereby repealed, as are any others
which, in whole or in part, conflict herewith,
SECTION 5. By reason of the foregoing, this Ordinance shall take
effect immediately upon its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to
the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause same to be published as
required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
/s/
Cit y Clerk
E -2
Appendix E
ORDINANCE 110
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE
SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION AND DELEGATING
ADMINISTRATION THEREOF TO THE CITY MANAGER
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore by resolution enacted
certain personnel policies and compensation rules; and,
WHEREAS, the said previous resolutions were not all encompassing
and it appears to be both desirable and necessary to develop a compre-
hensive system governing the administration of all personnel matters
within the City government; and,
WF:EF•EAS, the City Council is desirous of implementing the most
modern and effective system of personnel administration possible and
such system has now been developed and has heretofore been reviewed by
said City Council, which is desirous of fully implementing such system;
and,
WHEREAS, such system is deemed to be in essential compliance with
all applicable federal and state laws, rulings and regulations governing
fair, equal and bias -free public personnel administration and manage-
ment, hiring, promotion and other such personnel practices;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTIO" 1. The City Manager is hereby delegated the following
powers, authority and duties:
// r
(1) to develop, adopt, review, revise and readopt a position
classification plan encompassing all categories of appointed city
employees.
(2) to develop, adopt, review, revise and readopt comprehensive
personnel rules, forms and procedures governing the details of all
personnel administration and management encompassing all categories of
appointed city employees.
(3) to develop, review, revise, survey and to recommend to the
City Council for its adoption a salary plan encompassing all categories
of appointed city employees and to administer such plan after adoption
by the City Council.
(4) to act as City Personnel Officer and to have the authority to
delegate such duties inherent therein to whomsoever as he shall deem
appropriate, in whale or in part, by issuance of appropriate adminis-
trative orders.
(5) to keep the Council informed of changes affecting major per-
sonnel policy, the City employee force or personnel impacts on the
Community.
(6) to determine the pay of designated management employees within
minimums and maximums as set by Council resolution provided, however,
any such pay change for any such management employee is reported to the
E -1
-?/ 1g
.Fry
/ SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
A PLANNING COUNCIL OF COOPERATING INTERACTIVE GOVERNMENTS
_ EELp���LLL77y� �yyq�/q Suite 401, 334 W. Third Street
9 il ff e3 W il'Yr7 San Bernardino, California 92401 (714) 884 -8276
To: City Clerks - Cities of San Bernardino County
FROM Wes McDaniel
Executive Director
SUBJECT: Rail Commuter Resolution of Support
DATE: June 4, 1980
It has come to our attention that Caltrans will shortly be asking cities
within the county for resolutions and support regarding the proposed
San Bernardino to Los Angeles Commuter Rail project. The SANBAG Board
of Directors has been concerned over the lack of joint planning on this
issue and over the potential economic obligations.
After discussion at the June 4 SANBAG meeting, a motion was passed
approving transmittal, to each city, of the enclosed recommended additions
to the model Caltrans resolution. We have included the entire resolution
with our material in italics so that you might easily identify it.
SANBAG urges that any city wishing to adopt such a resolution of support
also include these recommended additions at such time. If there are any
questions, please contact us.
Thank you.
WCM:mk
Attachment
cc: SANBAG Delegate
Mayor
City Manager
Caltrans District 8
73
CITIES OF ADELANTO, BARSTOW, CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE. LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, NEEDLES, ,\
ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO. UPLAND, VICTORVILLE. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO /; U
STATE OF CAIIEORNIA- BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATON AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN 1R., G-- --
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT B, P.O. BOX DI
SAN BERNARDINO, CAIUORNIA W=
June 9. 1980
Mr. Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. Wasserman:
Re: Commuter Rail
service
Caltrans has recommended commuter rail service be implemented on
the Santa Fe rail line between San Bernardino and Los Angeles
and on the Union Pacific rail line from San Bernardino via
Riverside to Los Angeles.
We are requesting your support and participation (nonfinancial)
in the implementation of these services and would appreciate
your governing board's consideration of the attached sample
resolution.
A copy of the report, along with an executive summary including
a revised page 55 from the report, is enclosed. If you would
desire a presentation before your Council, or someone there to
respond to questions, please contact John Allison, (714)383 -4150.
Very truly yours,✓(
PEDDY et
D} triet Direct
att
cc: Wes McDaniel
r
NOTE: Italicized additions endorsed by SANBAG Board of Directors June 4, 1980
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -69
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, FINDING THAT PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE
BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO /RIVERSIDE AND
LOS ANGELES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA
recognizes the need for alternative means of transportation for its
residents and other residents within the potential service area of
the aforementioned commuter rail service; and
WHEREAS, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 have emphasized the
urgent need to cut hydrocarbon emissions drastically in the next five years;
and
WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has
recommended that the aforementioned commuter rail service be implemented on
the existing Santa Fe and Union Pacific rail lines between San Bernardino/
Riverside and Los Angeles; and
WNfR EAS, such recommendation has been made without the effective
study participation of the City or other applicable agencies, and
WHEREAS, it is the belief of the City Council that such service
would provide a valuable addition to transportation systems currently
available to the residents of Rancho Cucamonga and, further, the
other residents serviceable by the proposed commuter rail service;
7S 16�
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of concurs with, and is fully
supportive of, the proposed commuter rail service between San Bernardino/
Riverside and Los Angeles;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
finds the proposed commuter rail service
to be of the highest public convenience and necessity and encourages the
California Department of Transportation to pursue implementation at the
earliest possible date;
BE IT F[RTHEt RESOLVED that the Qty muncil of the Qty of
adopts such support only upon an expectation and
condition that the CYty and all appropriate regional agencies, specifically
including the San Bernardino County Transportation Commission, shall be
fully involved and made active participants in all planning and implementa-
tion activities from this date forward.
BE IT FfRTHFR RESOLVED that this concurrence does not imply,
implicitly or explicitly, participation by the City or other munty funding
agencies in any funding programs, either capital or operating and either
near or long term.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to mail copies
of this resolution to the Director of the California Department of Transporta-
tion, Sacramento, State Assemblyman State Senator
and tc cities in the Service Corridor,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Adopted by the said City Council by the following vote:
77
A
EXECUTIVE SLt -MARY
Introductio.
The primary purpose of this report is to identify which of the
three existing railroad lines (_he Atchison, Topeka, and the
Santa Fe; The Union Pacific; The Southern Pacific) from the
Riverside /San Bernardino area-to Los Angeles can be used to
quickly and efficiently implement a commute rail service.
The report makes use of and updates previous studies; namely,
Commuter Railroad Feasibility Study by Carl Englund, Jr.,
prepared for Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG) and San Bernardino Count'; Transit Alternatives Analysis
prepared for San 3ernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG).
Using these reports as a basis, an evaluation was made of the
Santa Fe, Union Pacific and Southern Pacific Railroad routes.
Conclusions
The evaluation of the Santa Fe and Union Pacific routes shows that
they are comparable based on patronage projections and do not
serve the same markets. There are then actually two separate rail
passenger corridors from the San 3ernardino /Riverside area to Los
Angeles. When both lines are in service, one would run from San
Bernardino to Los Angeles alonf! the Santa Fe tracks and the other
from San Bernardino to Riverside to Los Angeles along the Union
Pacific tracks.
i
C3�
At the present time, available financing is not sufficient to
implement services on both lines. However, it is anticipated
that some Senate Bill 620 funds will be available due to delays
in implementing some intercity and other commute services identi-
fied for this funding. If such _`lends are not available for
instituting service along both lines, we feel confident that
there is sufficient local support that we could seek additional
funding through the legislative process.
In view of the extremely heavy freight traffic and congestion on
the Southern Pacific line, it is not feasible to implement
commute service on this line.
Recommendations
This report recommends that:
1. Commute passenger rail service be implemented on both the
Santa Fe and Union Pacific routes with San Bernardino as
the starting point.
2. A passenger railroad operator be requested to operate
both services, under the direction of Calt.rans, for a
three -year demonstration period. Caltrans will. be
responsible for: management, scheduling, marketing,
feeder bus service coordina" on, facilities improvements
and service monitoring.
ii
v"
7F
Ll
3. The service for each route consists of two trains in the
morning peak commute hours from the Riverside -San Bernardino
area to Los Angeles and two :rains in the evening commute
hours from Los Angeles to the Riverside -San Bernardino area.
The proposed schedules call for combined service to operate
Monday through Friday only, and take into consideration
existing AMTRAK schedules on the Santa Fe Route. Partial
schedules of commuter
trains are as
follows:
SANTA FE ROUTE
Commuter
Commuter
Commuter
Commuter
1
3
1
3
Depart
6:05 AM
6.40 AM
San Bernardino 6:45 P14
7:15 PM
Arrive
Depart
6:40 AM
7:15 AM
Pomona
6:10 PM
6:40 PM
Depart
Arrive
7:35 AM
5:10 AM
I,AUPT
5 :15 PM
5:45 PM
Depart
Commuter
2
Depart 6:00 AM
Depart 6:19 AM
Depart 6:46 AM
Arrive 7:39 AM
UNION PACIF =C ROUTE.
Commuter
4
6:35 AM San Bernardin
6:54 AM Riverside
7:21 AM Pomona
8:14 AM LAUPT
Commuter
2
6:59 PM
6:40 PM
6:13 PM
5:20 PM
Commuter
4
7:29 PM Arrive
7 :10 PM Depart
6:43 PM Depart
5:50 PM Depart
Conservative projected patronage for the combined service
is estimated to be 1,228 /day for the Santa Fe Line and
1,932/day for the Union Pacific Line. Fares are based on
the Southern Pacific Peninsula Commute and are expected to
ranre down from a84 /month frcn San Bernardino or Riverside
to Los Angeles for a monthly commuter pass.
iii
5�
N
4. Initially, on the Santa Fe route, stations would be located
at: San Bernardino, Fontana, Upland, Pomona, Glendora,
Azusa, Monrovia, Pasadena and Los Angeles. This line
will make use of all existing facilities, but work will
be necessary to improve lighting, platforms, parking,
restrooms and handicapped facilities. Station improvements
for the Santa Fe Line are estimated to be $1,4001000. A
new station will be constructed at Glendora and Fontana.
On the Union Pacific route, stations will be located at:
San Bernardino, Riverside, Ontario, Pomona, Rowland
Heights, City of Industry, Pico Rivera, East Los Angeles
and Los Angeles. Necessary improvements including
shelters, lighting, parking, restroom facilities and
platforms will cost approximately $1,800,000.
5. If required, additional funding recommendations should be
made to the Legislature to ensure both routes are implemented.
iv
'R
•
RIVERSIDE /SAN BERNARDINO TO LOS ANGELES
TWO CORRIDOR
C0:,11l1TER RAIL SERVICE
Less Revenue & Subsidies
Annual Revenue $ 313,000
AT & SF
U.P.
Federal Subsidy 120,000
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
Total Revenue & Subsidies
to
Via Riverside
Estimate State Share of
Los Angeles
to Los Aneeles
Length (miles)
59.5
69.0
Travel Time
1 hr. 30 min.
1 hr. 39. min.
Station Stops
9
9
Patronage (daily)
1,2281
1,932
Estimated Operating Loss (State
113
142
Share) /Passenger Mlile
26,982
39,124
COSTS AND REVENUE ESTIMATES
AT & SF
U.P.
$0.01
San Bernardino
San Bernardino
to
Via Riverside
Los Angeles
to Los Angeles
Capital Costs
Station & Track Improv.
$1,354.000
$1,827,000
Equipment (oush -null)
525.000/yr
525,000/yr
Total Capital Costs
$1,879,000
$2.354,000
(2)
Operating Costs
Service (push -null)
81,485,000
$1,723,000
Marketino & Admin.
250,000
250,000
Total Operating Costs
$1,735,000
$1,973,000
Less Revenue & Subsidies
Annual Revenue $ 313,000
8 482,000
Federal Subsidy 120,000
120,000
Total Revenue & Subsidies
8 433,000
$ 602,000
Estimate State Share of
Operating Costs
$1,302,000
$1.371,000
Estimated Operating Cost/
Passenger Mile
$0.25
$0.19
Estimated Revenue /Passenger Mile
$0.05
$0.05
Estimated Operating Loss (State
Share) /Passenger Mlile
$0.19
$0.13
Estimated Operating I:oss (Federal
Share) /Passenger Mile
$0.01
$0.01
1Patronage does not include bus passengers from Riverside
transferring to train at San Bernardino
2 N deadheading and no babysitting
55
IRCZ 1
j- RIVERSIDE Pt SAN BERNARDINO TO I LOS ANGELES
I lrl�
COMMUTER RAIL STUDY
SANTA FE ROUTE
L >
N R-0
PA§4DENA MONROV�IA
?
_GLQDqRA (,.7 -2. :. —SAN 13 ERNA RDINO-.t',
7
p
AZW
FONTAN�A
POMO�A UPLAND.��Lr yi
LOS ANGELES, ........
UNION STATION -,-PO c
NA ONTARI;;'4..4,6
_�Z ... -------
%RIVERS E!I* 0
INDUSTRY 6NION'PACIFIC ROUTE
ROWLANDf'
OS Ab!9ELE,$ 77y\_
f
HEIGHTS i
> - ...... .
—7 1 _7 1 7
LEGEND
EXISTING AMTRAK STATIONS
0 PROPOSED STATIONS
SANTA FE ROUTE
UNION PACIFIC ROUTE
Appendix E
ORDINANCE 110
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE
SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION AND DELEGATING
ADMINISTRATION THEREOF TO THE CITY MANAGER
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore by resolution enacted
certain personnel policies and compensation rules; and,
WHEREAS, the said previous resolutions were not all encompassing
and it appears to be both desirable and necessary to develop a compre-
hensive system governing the administration of all personnel matters
within the City government; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of implementing the most
modern and effective system of personnel administration possible and
such system has now been developed and has heretofore been reviewed by
said City Council, which is desirous of fully implementing such system;
and,
WHEREAS, such system is deemed to be in essential compliance with
all applicable federal and state laws, rulings and regulations governing
fair, equal and bias -free public personnel administration and manage-
ment, hiring, promotion and other such personnel practices;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
. ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS;
SECTION 1. The ity Manager is hereby delegated the following
powers, authority a luties:
(1) to develop, adopt, review, revise and readopt a position
✓ classification plan encompassing all categories of appointed city
employees.
(2) to develop, adopt, review, revise and readopt comprehensive
personnel rules, forms and procedures governing the details of all
personnel administration and management encompassing all categories of
appointed city employees.
(3) to develop, review, revise, survey and to recommend to the
City Council for its adoption a salary plan encompassing all categories
of appointed city employees and to administer such plan after adoption
by the City Council.
(4) to act as City Personnel Office[` and.tq`have thor ity to
delegate such duties inherent therein to0y p� he s deem
appropriate, in whole or in part, by issuance of appropriate adminis-
trative orders.
(5) to keep the Council informed of changes affecting major per-
sonnel policy, the City employee•force or personnel impacts on the
Community.
(B) to determine the pay of designated management employees within
minimums and maximums as set by Council resolution provided, however,
any such pay change for any such management employee is reported to the
E -1
Council in executive session, together with the reasons why such pay
adjustment is to be made and how such individual employee's personal
performance and qualifications warrant such pay rate change. .
SECTION 2. The City Manager -shall be covered by said rules and
regulations as they may apply to perquisites, fringe benefits and
working conditions except that the City Council may enter into an
employment agreement with the City Manager to expand, clarify, supple-
ment, define and restrict such benefits as it shall deem appropriate,
including, but not limited to the following:
(a) termination pay,
(b) personal use of city vehicle,
(c) City -paid deferred compensation at a percentage of base
pay greater than that provided to other management
employees,
(d) additional sick leave, vacation and conference attendance,
(e) revised working hours in recognition of the exigencies of
the position,
(f) meritorious and longevity pay and bonuses,
(g) supplemental retirement benefits, and
(h) other benefits and perquisites peculiar to the office of
City Manager.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be uncon-
stitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council .
hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each
section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 4. A = =�_:..__�.s._ 1 rie7seDCOmpasairtg- personnel
by- swpaaded: MOre- speeifieelly,
utions 79 -48 and 79 -49 are hereby repealed. a___ _;4;1-uth-r.s,
SECTION 5. By 'season of the foregoing, this Ordinan hall take
c.£fect immediately upon\jts adoption. The City Clerk shall cer to
the adoption of -this Ordinance and shall cause same to be published-'6s
requr d by law. li, .zjiiL >` ,.,I'.:l n..,, -i/ .-.1 �), ri.+. r ,..;..t,.o.- �1�r)- F✓.C.%,G'�,.. 15,C,p'l`y�
.a., p+. »-y-..+ �+Y --, t -,[. x1.5, "t.fc ,�,°"'Yh ..// Nei. %.� c,.,
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Oay of , 1980.
AYES: � ,fc..
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
/s/
City Clerk
E -2
W
•
ORDINANCE NO. 28 -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUB - SECTION (f) OF SECTION
2.12 OF ORDINANCE NO. 28 TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS
TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS BE COPI-
STRUCTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF NINE (9) MONTHS FOLLOWING THE
RECORDATION OF A PARCEL MAP FOR EACH LOT UPON WHICH THERE
EXISTS A BUILDING OR OTHER USABLE STRUCTURE AT THE TIME
OF SUCH RECORDATION.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Sub- section (f) of Section 2.12 of Ordinance
No. 2B is her-- a yCi amended to read as follows:
"The City Council hereby finds that it is
necessary for reasons of public health and safety
that all off -site improvements be constructed
'within a period of nine (9) months following
the recordation of a parcel map for each lot on
which there exists a building or other usable
structure at the time of such recordation. The
foregoing provisions not withstanding, the City
City Engineer may postpone the construction of
off -site improvements to such later time as he
shall, in his discretion, determine if he finds
that at the time of recordation one of the fol-
lowing conditions exist:
1. Improvements cannot be installed to the
ultimate street alignments without creating
a traffic hazard .er- Netential- maintenanee
1ia6ility -fer- the -64y.
2. Proper functioning of the improvements would
require the installation of storm drain
improvements not a part of the conditions
of approval of the subdivision or planned for
t construction by the City.
3. ns a a ion o improvEggis on a major
water car ryinn street wea create potential
• flooding problems to surrounding public and
private improvements.
4. No off -site improvements exist contiguous
to the improved parcel being created and no
buildable lot will be created by the subdivision.
Where the PTanning Connnission and City Council
find that such other circumstances exist
which would make postponement beneficial to
the health, safety, and welfare of the City:
"No postponement of construction shall
be granted by the City Engineer unless the
owner of the subject parcel shall agree in
writing to construct required off -site improve-
ments at such future time as shall then or
thereafter be determined by the City Engineer
which said contract shall create a lien upon
the property to be divided as security for
the performance of said agreement. Any such
written contract and lien agreement shall
be recorded with 'the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County immediately subsequent
to the recordation of the subject parcel map. ".
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk sh,pll attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same
to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once
in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga,, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. _LL_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING GENERAL
PROVISIONS FOR USE IN THE INTERPRETATION AND
CONSTRUCTION OF ALL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NOW EXISTING OR
HEREAFTER ENACTED.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Definitions. The following words and
phrases, whenever used in the Ordinances of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, shall be construed as defined
in this section unless from the context a different meaning
is intended or unless a different meaning is specifically
defined and more particularly directed to the use of such
words or phrases:
(a) "City" and "town" each mean the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, or the area within the
territorial limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
and such territory outside of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, over which the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
has jurisdiction or control by virtue of any constitutional
or statutory provision.
(b) "Council" means the City Council of
the City of Ranc_hq.,ucamonga, California. "All its members"
or "a_ means the total number of councilmen
holding office.
(c) "County" means the County of San
Bernardino, California.
(d) "Law" denotes applicable federal
law, the Constitution and statutes of the State of California,
the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
and, when appropriate, any and all rules and regulations
which may be promulgated thereunder.
(e) "May" is permissive
(f) "Month" means a calendar month.
(g) "Must" and "shall" are each manda-
tory.
(h) "Oath" includes an affirmation or
declaration in all cases in which, by law, an affirmation
may be substituted for an oath, and in such cases the words
"swear" and "sworn" shall be equivalent to the words "af-
firm" and "affirmed ".
(i) "Owner ", applied to a building or
land, includes any part owner, joint owner, tenant in common,
joint tenant, tenant by the entirety, of the whole or a part
of such building or land.
(j) "Person" includes a natural person,
joint venture, joint stock company, partnership, associa-
tion, club, company, corporation, business, trust, organize-
-1-
tion, or the manager, lessee, agent, servant, officer or em-
ployee of any of them.
(k) "Personal property" includes money,
goods, chattels, things in action and evidences of debt.
(1) "Preceding" and "following" mean
next before and next after, respectively.
(m) "Property" includes real and per-
sonal property.
(n) "Real property" includes lands,
tenements and hereditaments.
(o) "Sidewalk" means that portion of a
street between the curbline and the adjacent property line
intended for the use of pedestrians.
(p) "State" means the State of Cali-
fornia.
(q) "Street" includes all streets,
highways, avenues, lanes, alleys, courts, places, squares,
curbs, or other public ways in this City which have been or
may hereafter be dedicated and open to public use, or such
other public property so designated in any law of this
State.
(r) "Tenant" and "occupant ", applied to
a building or land, include any person who occupies the
whole or a part of such building or land, whether alone or
with others.
(s) "Written" includes printed, type-
written, mimeographed, multigraphed, or otherwise reproduced
in permanent visible form.
SECTION 2: Title of Office. Use of the title of
any officer, employee, department, board or commission means
that officer, employee, department, board or commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
SECTION 3: Interpretation of Language. All words
and p rases shall be construed according to the common and
approved usage of the language, but technical words and
phrases and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and
appropriate meaning in the law shall be construed and un-
derstood according to Bach peculiar and appropriate meaning.
SECTION 4: Grammatical Interpretation. The follow-
ing grammatical rules shall apply in the Ordinances of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, unless it is apparent
from the context that a different construction is intended:
(a) Gender. Each gender includes the
masculine, feminine and neuter genders.
(b) Singular and Plural. The singular
number includes the plural and the plural includes the sin-
gular.
(c) Tenses. Words used in the present
6a
tense include the past and the future tenses and vice versa,
unless manifestly inapplicable.
SECTION 5: Acts by Agents. When an act is required
by an Ordinance, the same being such that it may be done as
well by an agent as by the principal, such requirement shall
be construed to include all such acts performed by an auth-
orized agent.
SECTION 6: Prohibited Acts include Causing and
Permitting. Whenever in the Ordinances of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, any act or omission is made
unlawful, it shall include causing, allowing, permitting,
aiding, abetting, suffering, or concealing the fact of such
act or omission.
SECTION 7: Computation of Time. Except when other-
wise provided, the time within which an act is required to
be done shall be computed by excluding the first day and
including the last day, unless the last day is Sunday or a
holiday, in which case it shall also be excluded.
SECTION 8: Construction. The provisions of the
Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and
all proceedings under them are to be construed with a view
to effect their objects and to promote justice.
SECTION 9: Repeal Shall Not Revive Any Ordinances.
The repeal of an Ordinance shall not repeal the repealing
clause of any Ordinance or revive any Ordinance which has
been repealed thereby.
SECTION 10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and
the City�rs shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15)
days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City of
Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-3-
ORDINANCE NO. 58 -B
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 58 TO PER -
MIT THE USE OF LIEN AGREEMENTS AS SECURITY FOR
THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF OFF -SITE IMPP•OVEi•SENTS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 6 of Ordinance No. 58 is hereby amended
to read as follows:
"Section 6. Construction of Public Improvements -
Prerequisite to Approval of the Build-
ing official.
"(a) Except as provided in Section 5, the
Building Official shall deny issuance of a building
permit, or deny approval for occupancy or deny final
approval and acceptance for public utility connec-
tions to any building or parking lot until required
full frontage improvements exist, or are constructed
or their construction is guaranteed by an executed
agreement and cash money deposited with the City in
a sum approved by the City Engineer based upon one -
and- one -half (1 -1/2) times the estimated cost of
construction.
"(b) In the event construction of full front-
age improvements is not required to be completed
within six (6) months after the issuance of the build-
ing permit, the City Engineer may, at his option, re-
quire that a lien upon the property to be improved
be created by contract between the owner and the City
as security for the performance by the owner of the
construction guarantee agreement instead of a cash
deposit. In the event a lien agreement is required
pursuant to this section, no building permit shallbe
said lien agreement issued until �x is recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder of S'a�n Bernardino County. ".
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
city Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general
circulation, published in the C1ty of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
1980. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Clty C erk
ORDINANCE NO. 66 -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 66 PERTAINING TO THE INELI-
GIBILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY
THE CITY.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 1 of Ordinance No. 66 of the
City is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Section 1: No person convicted (including
pleas of guilty and nolo contendre) of a felony
or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude shall
be eligible for employment by any department of
the City; provided, however, the appointing auth-
ority shall disregard such conviction if it is
found and determined by such appointing authority
that mitigating circumstances exist, such as, but
not limited to, evidence of rehabilitation, the
length of time elapsed since such conviction, the
age of such person at the time of the conviction,
or the fact that the classification applied for
is unrelated to such conviction. ".
ACTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and
the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15)
days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report,
a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING GEN-
ERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
OTHER CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: (a) Any person violating any of the
provisions or failing to comply with any of the mandatory
requirements of the Ordinances of the City, or any code
adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, unless the violation is made an
infraction by Ordinance.
Except
punishment is prescribed by any Ordinance of where n
the City, any
person convicted of a misdemeanor for violation of anOrdi-
nance of the City, or any code adopted by reference by
Ordinance of the City, is punishable by a fine of not more
than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), or by imprisonment not
to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprison-
ment.
(c) Any person convicted of an infrac-
tion for violation of an Ordinance of the City, or any code
adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, is punishable
by:
(1) A fine not exceeding Fifty
Dollars ($50.00) for a first violation;
(2) A fine not exceeding One Hun-
dred Dollars ($100.00) fgr a second vio }fit' n of the same
Ordinance or code withinQone (1) year)and; "'
(3) A fine not exceeding Two Hun-
dred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) fqr each additional violation
of the same Ordinance or code) ithin one (1) year.,.
)
a separate offense for each cand uever every day during anyuportion
of which any violation of any provision of the Ordinances of
the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of
the City, is committed, continued or permitted by any such
person, and he shall be punishable accordingly.
(e) In addition to the penalties pro-
vided for by this Ordinance, or elsewhere by Ordinance or by
any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, any
condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any
of the provisions of the Ordinances of the City, or any code
adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, shall be
deemed a public nuisance and may be abated by the City, and
each day such condition continues shall be regarded as a new
and separate offense.
In civil action commenced
the City to abate a public nuisance,toenjoina violation
ac
of any provision of any Ordinance of the City, or any code
adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, the City
shall be entitled to recover from the defendant(s) in any
such action reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit.
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and
the City Clerk shall attest to the -ame, and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15)
days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a
newspaper of general circulation published in the City of
Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-2-
Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. ICJ
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE
NO. 14 AND ORDINANCE NO. 18.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Ordinance No. 14 of the City is hereby
repealed.
SECTION 2: Ordinance No. 18 of the City is hereby
repealed.
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and
the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15)
days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a
newspaper of general circulation publishedin the City of
Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST
City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center,
9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, July 2, 1980. The meeting was
called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led in the pledge to
the flag.
Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, and Mayor
Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also present: City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson;
Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; City Planner, Barry Hogan; and City
Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs.
Absent: Councilman Arthur H. Bridge and Community Development Director, Jack Lam
Approval of Minutes: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve the Minutes
of June 9, 1980 and July 18, 1980. Frost requested that Bill Wieland's now be
added to the June 18 minutes, page 1, under Planning Commission appointments since
he had also been considered. Motion for approval of amended minutes was passed
by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Frost, Mikels, Palombo. NOES: None.
ABSENT: Bridge.
Mayor Schlosser called a special Executive Session with the City Attorney regarding
some litigation. Council adjourned to the Executive Session at 7:05 p.m. The
public meeting reconvened at 7:25 p.m. with all members of Council and staff present
except Councilman Bridge who was on vacation.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to move the decision making on filling
the Planning Comission vacancy until the July 16 meeting. Motion carried 4 -0 -1.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80 -6 -30 for $504,773.49.
b. Tract 9539 - Acceptance of Map, Bonds, and Agreement:
Tentative approval had been received from the County on January 1, 1977. This
tract is located on the west side of Sapphire Street between Banyan Street and
Hillside Road and consists of 19 lots. A set -aside letter in the amount of
$174,000.00 to guarantee off -site improvements has been submitted along with
Improvement Agreement.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRACT MAP
9539, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
C. Tract 9351 - Release of Bonds and Acceptance of Substitution Bonds. Located
on the west side of Sapphire Street between 19th Street and Banyan. Owner:
Mark III Homes.
Release the following bonds:
Performance Bond (road) $148,000
Labor 6 Material (road) 74,000
Performance Bond (water) 45,000
Labor S Material (water) 22,500
Accept the following substitute bonds:
Performance Bond (road) $148,000
Labor & Material (road) 148,000
d. Contract for the Collection of Special Assessments - Landscape Maintenance
District.
Approval of agreement authorizing the County Auditor to assess $2.00 to pro-
perty owners to cover the cost of assessment collections on Landscape Mainten-
ance District No. 1.
e. Acceptance of Signal Contract at Haven Avenue and Amber Lane and Authorization
to record a Notice of Completion.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -66
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WORK AT HAVEN AVENUE AND AMBER
LANE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
I. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement (Director Review No. 80 -02).
Wallner Tooling was conditionally approved to install or bond for the street
construction of 7th Street by Director Review 80 -02. They were informed that when
Caltrans made a decision as to the approval or denial of the on -off ramp, thev
may have to install improvements on Hyssop. The following bonds are per staff
agreement with Mr. Wallner.
Performance Bond (surety) $ 16,000
Labor & Material (surety) 16,000
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -67
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IM-
PROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 80 -02.
g. Parcel Map 5545 - Replacement Bonds.
Located on the north side of Base Line west of Archibald for three lots. Owner:
Lewis Homes.
The subject Parcel Map was approved by Council on March 5, 1980 along with bonds
for the required street improvements. Subsequent design checks resulted in the
elimination of a city requested cul -de -sac for Roberds Court. Therefore, the
bond for the cul -de -sac could be eliminated.
Release of bonds:
Performance Bond (surety) $ 20,000
Labor & Material (surety) 20,000
Replacement bonds:
Performance Bond (surety) $ 10,000
Labor & Material (surety) 10,000
h. Parcel Map 5358 - Acceptance of Map.
Located on the east side of Archibald at the north city limits. Owner: Mr.
Worth Hooper,
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -68
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NUMBER 5358 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5358).
L. Tract 9366: Release of bonds. Located on the northwest corner of 19th Street
and Haven Avenue. Owner: Valle Verde Ltd.
Performance Bond (road) $ 78,000
j. Tract 9427: Release of bonds. Located on the north and south sides of Banyan
Street between Hermosa Avenue. Owner: Lesny /Wilshire Properties
Landscaping Bonds $ 12,000
k. Tract 9429: Release of Temporary Occupancy Permit Bond for on -site subdivision
sign located at the northwest corner of Haven and 19th Street. Owner: Valle
Verde. Ltd.
T.O.P. Bond $250.00
1. Tract 9321: Release of Temporary Occupancy Permit Bond for sales office/
garage conversion on lot 4 and on -site subdivision sign. Located at the north-
west corner of Alta Loma Drive and Sapphire Street. Owner: Crowell- Leventhal,
Inc.
T.O.P. Bond $ 2,000
Savings Passbook 250
Inc -- App! eve}- ef- A }eehe } }e -Beve rage- } }eeneec-- Fnmp-= n- Fnee!y- Feed- 6eeree; - }ne -;
9683- 8eee -64ne- Reed- fe!- eff -ee }e -beer- end- w }M- } }eenee. (Item removed for dis-
cussion).
n. Authorization for City Council members and City Manager to attend the first
Mayors and Council Members Executive Forum, July 23 -25 in Monterey.
It is recommended that the City Council authorize for as many Council members
as possible and for the City Manager to attend the first Mayors and Council
Members Executive Forum to be sponsored by the League of California Cities. The
program is aimed at providing Council members and key staff representatives with
an ongoing education concerning the responsibilities of locally elected and
appointed officials. Funds have been included in the meetings and travel budget
for this conference attendance.
o. Set July 16, 1980 for public hearing on the expenditure of Revenue Sharing Funds,
It is recommended that the City Council set a public hearing for July 16, 1980
to review the proposed expenditure of Revenue Sharing funds. The public hearing
is a federal requirement and must be preceeded by the appropriate advertising
in the local newspapers.
Councilman Palombo requested item "m" be removed for discussion.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve the Consent.Calendar subject
to the Finance Committees approval of the Warrants, Motion carried 4 -0 -1,
Item "m "; Palombo asked where this place was; he could not seem to locate it. Staff
indicated it was in the shopping center on the southwest corner of Base Line and
Archibald, next to the Baskin and Robbins Ice Cream Store. Motion: Moved by Palombo,
seconded by Mikels to approve item "m" on the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 4 -0 -1.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
4A, POSTPONEMENT OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AS A CONDITION OF SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT
(REVISION' TO ORDINANCE NOS. 28 AND 58). Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs.
At its June 18, 1980 meeting, the Council expressed concern that provisions for
postponement be more specifically defined and that other cases receive direct Council
review. Therefore, the ordinances had been further refined,
The City Attorney recommended that this be postponed further to rework the
ordinances. lie noticed several problems which would require some indepth study
to resolve.
Mavor Schlosser stated that Ordi.e Nos. 28 -A and 58 -B be referred back to the staff
for study.
4B. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - C.N. BRUBAKER. A
request for change of zone from R- 1- 20,000 to R- 1- 10,000 or more restrictive zoning
for property located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Amethyst Streets.
Staff report by Barry Hogan.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of ORDINANCE 40. 113 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 1062- 401 -11 FROM R -1- 20,000 TO
R -1- 10,000 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
BANYAN AND AMETHYST STREETS.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Frost to waive further reading. Motion carried
4 -0 -1.
The mayor opened the meeting for public hearing.
Sharon Romero asked if this were not really less restrictive. Mr. Hogan
explained that this would be the same size house; this would simply pro-
hibit the keeping of animals.
Since there were no other responses, the public hearing was closed.
Mayor Schlosser set July 16 for second reading.
4C. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT AREA. Staff report by Lloyd
Hobbs.
The proposed ordinance designates the area bounded by Eighth Street on the south,
Arrow Route on the north, Milliken on the east, and Haven Avenue on the west as a
special impact zone where no increases in site drainage may be created.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of ORDINANCE NO. 111 for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT ZONE NORTH OF THE SANTE
FE RAILROAD TO ARROW ROUTE BETWEEN HAVEN AND
MILLIKEN AVENUES, AND REQUIRING DETAILED ENGINEERING
STUDIES AND MITIGATION MEASURES IN CONNECTION THERE-
WITH.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion
carried 4 -0 -1.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing.
Marsha Storm asked what fee Ordinance No. 111 was referring to? Mr. Hobbs
stated it was referring to Ordinance No. 75, Ordinance No. 112, or what-
ever ordinance was in effect at the time.
There being no other responses, the Mayor closed the public hearing.
Council discussed Section 3 of the ordinance. The following change was made to
Section 3(1): "That the proposed project will not increase storm runoff from the
site except where acceptable drainage facilities exist to accept said runoff,"
Mayor set July 16 for second reading of Ordinance No. 111.
4D. PROPOSED INCREASE FOR INDUSTRIAL STORM DRAIN FEE. A proposal to increase
storm drain fees in the area bounded by Deer Creek on the west, Day Creek on the
east, 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. Proposed fee - $4600 per acre. Staff
report by Lloyd Hobbs.
Citv Clerk Wasserman read title of ORDINANCE NO. 112 for first reading.
AN ORDINANACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA, MAKING
ORDINANCE NO. 75 APPLICABLE THERETO, AND ESTA-
BLISHING A DRAINAGE FEE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Frost to waive further reading. Motion
carried 4 -0 -1.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. The following addressed Council in
opposition to the proposed fee:
Dan Milliken - felt it was too excessive
Buster Filpi - asked why the area did not go above Foothill? Mr. Hobbs
said that area would be studied at a later time.
Ben Wick, General Manager, Wagner Insul Company, felt this was a burden
on them.
Ray Smartis, General Manager, Ontario Motor Speedway, expressed that some
problems could exist for the OMS if the flow of water was increased.
Bob DeBerard - asked to have this delayed for a month since the people west
of Haven have problems and this needed to be discussed further.
Since there were no other responses, the Mayor closed the public hearing_
After some council discussion, the Mayor set July 16 for second .reading of Ordinance
No. 112.
4E. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 110.
City Manager Wasserman presented some changes to the Ordinance which were as
follows:
"Section 1. The City Manager is hereby delegated the following powers, authority,
and /or duties:
"Section 1 (4): to act as City Personnel Officer and to have the authority to
delegate such duties inherent therein to a management employee as he shall
deem appropriate, in whole or in part, by issuance of appropriate adminis-
trative orders.
"Section 4. Resolutions 79 -48 and 79 -49 are hereby repealed.
"Section 5. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause
the same to be published with fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once
in the Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City
of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 110 as first reading again.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION
AND DELEGATING ADMINISTRATION THEREOF TO THE CITY
MANAGER.
Notion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion
Carrie: 4 -0 -1.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
hearing was closed.
The mavor set July 16 for second reading of Ordinance No. 110.
Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 8:55 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:10 p.m.
with all members of the Council and staff present.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
SA. REQUEST FROM CALTRANS TO SUPPORT COPPRITER RAIL SERVICE BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO
AND LOS ANGELES. St ff report by Lauren Wasserman.
The mayor opened the meeting for public comments.
Bruce Chitiea asked several questions regarding Caltrans' figures.
Mayor closed the public portion of the meeting.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to table the item for further con-
sideration. Motion passed by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo.
NOES: Frost. ABSENT: Bridge.
Council directed staff to send a letter to Caltrans stating we wished to receive more
information and that the city officials would like to meet with a representative of
Caltrans.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
The City Attorney presented the following ordinances which Book Publishing Company
had requested. These were necessary before July 31 in order for Book to start
the printing process for our city code.
A. AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE INELICIflILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR E6IPLOYMENT
BY THE CITY.
City Clerk read title of ORDINANCE NO. 66 -A for first reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION
1 OF ORDINANCE N0, 66 PERTAINING TO THE INELI-
GIBILITY OF CERTAIN PRESONS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY
THE CITY.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to waive further reading. A "no"
vote was cast by Frost; therefore, the City Clerk read the Ordinance in full.
The mayor opened the meeting for public bearing. There being no response, the
hearing was closed. Mayor Schlosser set July 16 for second reading.
B. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS 14 AND 18,
City Clerk read title of ORDINANCE NO. 115 (first reading).
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 14 AND ORDINANCE NO. 18.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried
4 -0 -1.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the hearing was closed.
Mayor set July 16 for second reading of Ordinance No. 115.
C. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF CITY ORDINANCES.
The City Clerk read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 114, (first reading).
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING GEN-
ERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
OTHER CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion
carried 4 -0 -1.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing
was closed. Mayor Schlosser set July 16 for second reading.
D. AN ORDINANCE SETTING UP GENERAL INTERPRETATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION OF CITY
ORDINANCES.
The City Clerk read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 116 (first reading).
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING GENERAL
PROVISIONS FOR USE IN THE INTERPRETATION AND CON-
STRUCTION OF ALL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NOW EXISTING OR HEREAFTER
ENACTED.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion
carried 4 -0 -1.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the hearing was closed. Mayor Schlosser set July 16 for second reading.
Councilman Frost questioned the word "year" and what was meant by it. After
some discussion, Council decided to delete item (t) from Ordinance No. 116
in the definitions in Section 1.
City Clerk read the title of Ordinance No. 116 again. Motion: Moved by Mikels,
seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried 4 -0 -1.
E. AGINS VERSUS TIBERON. Mr. Dougherty announced that in the Agins versus
Tibetan case, the Supreme Court tied ruled in favor of the City of Tibetan.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to adjourn. Motion carried 4 -0 -1.
The meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
_6Oc� C:«&C,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk