The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980/07/16 - Agenda Packet`�c��cn.Np4 i I �9 F U Z U > 1977 Qry OF RAWM CUUAAi()`CA CITY 7777��C�OUNGTL C]lJiilVEK July 16, 1980 AGENDA ITEMS: All items submitted for the City Council agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Pledge to Flag B. Roll Call: Frost_, Mikels_, Palombo_, Bridge_, and Schlosser_ C. Approval of minutes: June 26, 1980 and July 2, 1980 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Advisory Commission Recessed for Sumner months (July and August) b. Appointment to fill Planning Commission vacancy. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80 -7 -16 for $234,255.40 1 b. Parcel Map No. 5684 Acceptance of Map 3 The subject map is a subdivision of 19 acres into 6 lots located at the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald by Henry Reiter. The street improvements were installed under site approvals and therefore, bonds are not required prior to final approval of the map. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 4 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5684. — (Tentative Parcel Map. No. 5684) City Council Agenda -2- July 16, 1980 c. Parcel Map No. 5893 Acceptance of Map 7 Parcel Hap. No. 5893 is a division of land on the north side of Victoria Avenue, 440 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue. The map was submitted by Robert F. Barton. Street improvements will be constructed or bonded before building permits are issued. RESOLUTION N0. 80 -70 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP. NO. 5893. (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5893) 10 d. Parcel Map No. 5892 Acceptance of Map Parcel Map No. 5892 is for the division of a one acre lot into two lots at the southwest corner of Hellman and Hillside. The map was submitted by Cynthia Prescher, owner /subdivider. The street improvements were installed by the owner and recently accepted by Public Works Inspection Staff. 11 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL IMP NO. 5892. (TENTATIVE MAP NO. 5892) 13 e. Bond Extension The owner of the parcel map is requesting a 12 month extension with the commitment of doing the improvements so stated in the agreement he has entered with the City. It is recommended that Council approve a 6 month extension. 15 f. Tract 9427: Release of bonds. Located on the north and south sides of Banyan Street between Hermosa and Haven. Owner: Lesny Development Co. Labor and Material Bond (Road) Labor and Material Bond (Water) Labor and Material Bond (Sewer) g. Tract 8884: Release of bonds. Locate sides of Red Hill Country Club Drive. and Company. $53,000 $19,500 $20,500 d on the east and south 15 Owner: Harnish, Morgan City Council Agenda -3- July 16, 1980 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer On -site) $ 6,500 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer Off -site) $ 21,000 Labor and Material Bond (Water) $ 21,000 h. Tract 9362: Release of bonds. Located on the Southeast corner 15 of Base Line and Haven. Owner: Lesney /Wilshire Properties. Labor and Material Bond (Road) $ 79,000 15 i. Tract 9617: Release of bonds. Located on the west side of Hellman north of Arrow Route. Owner: M.J. Brock & Sons, Inc. Labor and Material Bond (Landscaping) $ 7,530 j. Recommendation to adopt Employment Agreement with City Manager 16 The consultant who recently completed the City's position classification plan has recommended that the City Council con- sider approval of an employment agreement with the City Manager. The proposed agreement, which is based on the International City Management Association's Employment Guidelines for Urban Administrators, merely stipulates those provisions of employ- ment w is are both similar to and, in recognition of the job, different from other employees. The proposed agreement con- solidates into a single document all of the conditions and terms of employment for the incumbent City Manager. It is significant to note that an employment agreement is required in order to implement a deferred compensation benefit to the City Manager. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Mayor be authorized to sign the employment agreement on behalf of the City. k. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License. 7 -11 Food Store, 25 6612 Carnelian Avenue for off sale beer & wine 1. Request to re- establish previously authorized Associate Planner 26 position. One of the Planning Division's Assistant Planners resigned to accept another position in Northern California. This position was orignally an Associate Planner classification but was reclass- ified to Assistant Planner to better reflect the performance of the individual in this position. With the Assistant Planner position now vacant, staff would recommend that the original Associate Planner position be re- established to better accommodate the depart- ment's needs at this tine. City Council Agenda -4- July 16, 1980 m. Set August 6, 1980 for public hearing for Zoning Ordinance amendment No. 80 -01 Condominium Conversion n. Authorization for Director of Community Services to attend 27 National Recreation & Parks Association Conference in Phoenix in October, 1980 o. N.I.C. D. Request for Additional Funding 28 — Request by the National Institute for Community Development for an additional $1,120 to cover mandatory personnel deductions connected with Project Esperanza 4, PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ZONE CHANGE 80 -07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - C.H. 30 BRUBAKER. A request for change of zone from - - 00 to —RT -ff 000 or more restrictive zoning for property located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Amethyst Streets. 30 ORDINANCE NO. 113 (Second Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1062- 401 -11 FROM R- 1- 20,000 TO R -1- 10,000 LOCATED IN THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF BANYAN AND AMETHYST STREETS. B. All ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT AREA 31 Proposed Ordinance to designate the area bounded by Eighth Street on the south, Arrow Route on the north, Milliken on the east and Haven Avenue on the west as a special impact zone where no increases in site drainage may be created. 32 ORDINANCE NO. 111 (Second Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT ZONE NORTH OF THE SANTA FE RAILROAD TO ARROW ROUTE BETWEEN HAVEN AND MILLIKEN AVENUES, AND REQURING DETAILED ENGINEERING STUDIES AND MITIGATION MEASURES CONNECTION THEREWITH. City Council Agenda -5- July 16, 1980 C. PROPOSED INCREASE FOR INDUSTRIAL STORM DRAIN FEE 35 Proposal to adopt Ordinance No. 112 to increasestorm drain fees in the area bounded by Deer Creek on the west, Day Creek on the east, 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard Proposed fee - $4,600 /acre. ORDINANCE N0: 112 (second reading) 36 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA, MAKING ORDINANCE NO. 75 APPLICABLE THERETO, AND ESTABLISHING A DRAINAGE FEE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. D. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 110 38 ORDINANCE NO. 110 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMIN- ISTRATION AND DELEGATING ADMINISTRATION THEREOF TO THE CITY MANAGER. E. AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE INELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN 40 ERSONS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY THE CIT ORDINANCE NO. 66 -A (second reading) 40 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 66 PERTAINING TO THE INELI- GIBILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY CITY. 41 F. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 14 and 18 ORDINANCE NO. 115 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 41 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 14 AND ORDINANCE NO. 18 G. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF 42 CITY ORDINANCES. City Council Agenda -6- July 16, 1980 ORDINANCE P10. 114 (Second Reading) 42 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING GEN- ERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC41ONGA AND OTHER CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. H. AN ORDINANCE SETTING UP GENERAL INTERPRETATIONS AND CON- 44 STRUCTI N OF CITY ORDINANCES ORDINANCE N0. 116 (Second Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR USE IN THE INTERPRETATION AND CON - STRUCTION OF ALL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NOW EXISTING OR HEREAFTER ENACTED. I. POSTPONEMENT OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AS A CONDITION OF SUB- 47 DIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT - (REVISION TO ORDINANCE NOS. 28 AND 53 The proposed Ordinances will allow the Council to postpone street improvements for developed parcels of a subdivision or under such other cases where construction would normally be required but is impractical at the current time. In all cases, a lien agreement will be required to insure future construction. 48 ORDINANCE N0. 28 -A (First Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUB - SECTION 9f, OF SECTION 2.12 OF ORDINANCE 110. 28 TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL OFF - SITE IMPROVEMENTS BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF NINE (9) MONTHS FOLLOWING THE RECORDATION OF A PARCEL MAP FOR EACH LOT UPON WHICH THERE EXISTS A BUILDING OR OTHER USABLE STRUCTURE AT THE TIME OF SUCH RECORDATION. ORDINANCE NO. 58 -B (First Reading) 49 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 58 TO PERMIT THE USE OF LIEN AGREEMENTS AS SECURITY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS. City Council Agenda -7- July 16, 1980 J. REVENUE SHARING - ENTITLEMENT 11 50 Report by Harry Empey In previous fiscal years, the City has allocated the entire Revenue Sharing appropriation to support the contract requirements of the Sheriff's Department. For Fiscal year 1980 -81, it is recommended that the City again appropriate Revenue Sharing in its entirety to support the Sheriff's contract. Revenue Sharing monies repre- sents one of the few remaining alternative sources of revenue to supplement the increasing costs of basic services. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. TREE PRESERVATION . An overview of issues and options related to the preservation of the Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees and the existing tree preservation policies. B. AWARD OF "NORTH TOWN" STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 51 Request to award contract for construction of street improvements to Robert Escudero, Inc. at a bid of $297,134.22 and authorize funds expenditure. C. APPROVAL OF CARNELIAN STREET REALIGNMENT AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTS 54 Proposed that Council approve design contracts with Genge Consultants for the realignment of Carnelian Street between Foothill Blvd. and Base Line, and for the two phased land- scaping of Carnelian from Foothill Blvd. to Hillside Road The Street Alignment contract is not to exceed $18,200.00. Phase I Landscape design $19,125.00, Phase II $23,625.00 D. REPORT ON SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESS- 69 RT PROGRAM. Oral Presentation by Lloyd HUbbs. E. CONTRACT FOR EXTENSION OF SERVICES WITH SEDWAY /COOKE 72 Request by Sedway /Cooke to extend the time allocated to provide the City with a complete General Plan. There is no change in the originally budgeted amount, only in the time necessary for completion and the extent of the work provided by Sedway /Cooke. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 7. ADJOURNMENT 1.1 R667 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y WARR M VEN N V E N C 0 R N A M E 00662 7985 PUBLIC ENP RETIREMENT S . 00663 1201 BANK OF AMERICA NT 6 SA 6599 KISHEN, CHRISTINE .00664 00665 7293 '9470 MC ELENNEY F 00666 00667 3305 WHITLEY, MAXINE EMPLOYMENT OEVLPMNT OEP 00668 6313 SAN BRNONO CO EMPLOY C 00669 -120C BANK OF AMERICA 00670 465C GLENDALE FEDERAL SAVING • 04313 7293 MC ELENNEY F 04366 ,VOIC FORMS ALIGNMENT 04367 VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT 04368 VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT 1 04369 0004 A -1 LINEN II 04370 ,.0240 ALTA LOMA AUTO PARTS R 04371 104C GORDON AVERS CAMERA SHO 04372 130C BASELINE HARDWARE 04373 1710 HRID6E, ARTHUR 04374 190C C G ENGINEERING 04375 2200 CENTRAL MICROFILM SERV - 04376 2335 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO -� X04377 2450 CO SAN BERNARDINO SHERI c:.04378 2575 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 04379 2595 CUCAMONGA PRINTING 04380 2604 CYPERT, PHYLLIS 04381 2700 OETCU 04382 2835 DIXON, WANDA •. 04383 2904 OVORAK, GAYLE - -04384 3300 iMPEY, HARRY J - .04385 3304 EMPIRE CONCRETE SAVING 04386 4175 FROST' JAMES - �lR 04387 4590 GENERAL ELECTRIC - 04388 460C GENERAL TELEPHONF CO - 04389 4775 GRANT. JERRY R 04390 4818 HARTUNG, GARY 04391 4833 HELMANS DEPT STORE S• 04392 4885 HOGAN, BARRY K 04393 490C HOLLEY, WILLIAM L . 04394 4925 HILL JEFF 04395 4995 HUM I LLOYD 04396 5275 INTL CITY MGT ASSOC - 04397 6618 KRUSf.- JOAN 04398 6619 KUNTL: CHARLES 04399 663C LAM. JACK - 04400 6783 LINVILLE- SANOERSON -HORN - 04401 678E LITTON EDUCATIONAL DUEL 04402 6790 LOFTUS, OWEN 04403 663C LOGUE, SALLY 04404 6875 LGWES POWER TOOLS - 04405 700C MKGK /YAMAMOTO INC 04406 7185 MANSION INN 04407 726`, MC NIEL, LARRY T - 04408 7280 MEARE.S, PEI. 04409 73CC MIKELS, JON 0 04410 7303 MILES, FREDDIE B 04411 7360 NCOEBN ALLOYS INC - 04412 7375 MONAHAN CLAUDIA 04413 7530 NEMERr fiRRY 04414 772C PALOPOn MICHAEL 04415 7736 PAS GRA�HICS INC - 04416 7825 PROGRESS BULLETIN - 04417 8005 RADCLIFF, JULES 04418 602C RAMIREZ, CONSEPCION '�� 04419 9045 RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE 04420 8075 RAPID OA TA INC - 04421 810C REMPtL, HERMAN 04422 9115 RICHARO PILLS ASSOC 04423 8196 SULLIVAN PE ROBERT A 04424 8190 ROBERTS CARtSOI STEAM CL - 04425 820C ROBINSON, JAMES H •04426 8324 SCHLGSSER' PHILLIP 04427 8338 SEVEN SEAS - 04428 8371 SNELL, FRANCES - 04429 8390 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON+ MARR DATE DUNT NET 5,871.70 29.41 266.93 70.00 6.75 2,015.18 771.50 5r 185.03 377.00 ' 76.75- 95.50 1.99 46.43 233.31 30.00 11,301:7 914 159.97 179,053.83 241.53 1,943.46 4,677.78 864.32 125.00 30.00 76.32 150.00 150.00 30.00 200.00 8.25 45.00 76.50 200.00 1,615.50 10.81 30.00 l li 193.50 5.00 695.87 1 .867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WARR / VEN Y V E N 0 0 R N A M E `4431 8396 SOUTHERN SO CA LANDSCAPE CO MGT .4432 839E SOUTHLANC PAPER CO j4433 8525 STATIONERS CORP 4434 8540 SUN TELEGRAM 4435 9158 VELO -BINC INC 4436 9185 WARO, ELLIE 4437 9290 WEST ENO UNITED MAY ' 4438 939C WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT J4439 9992 YOUNG. ED 34440 9997 ZAZU =TA AL 04441 VOIC FINAL fCTALS WAR WARR DATE 7/16/80 7/16/00 7/16/80 7/16/00 7/16/80 7/16/80 7/16/80 7/16/80 7/16/80 7/16/80 7/16/80 7/16/00 $COUNT NET .....77.24 . 4,217.83 • 236.43 952.91 �- 65.79 .0'109.00 . .,___.•1.x242.00 ... - 1,240.59 30.00 30.00 234,255.40 13 a • • CITY OF RANCW 0-CA N MA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map No. 5684 The subject map is a subdivision of 19 acres into 6 lots located at the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald by Henry Reiter. The street improvements were installed under site approvals and therefore, bonds are not required prior to final approval of the map. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map No. 5684 and allowing the City Engineer to forward the map for recording. Respectfully submitted, L / f/ LBHJLM:jas Attachment • RESOLUTION NO. 80 -51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5684. (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5684) WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 5684, submitted by Linville- Sanderson -Horn and consisting of 6 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Archibald and Arrow, being a division of a portion of the north ,, of the northeast of the southeast :, of Section 10, Township 1 south, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5684 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 5684 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to • present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City 7fl erk -y. Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ITENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 5684 t • • • - ° �c I 'i In i � • • I� j t • • • • A 9 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5684 4y Gnr^.y CNMn. /' �� n N K.M �.xJ( o /� /r Nn.rwn.nr M �N .M MN✓ a MGY"/r of Sdw /. u..i:nI iin�/A�Arnl• r�1. lse nx / / IX � ary s�frM1 1 !A %9 931: MOUSYHIA! YOPI h`I5: 61-H -1 III I �� ruurxirr 0 ' £• � III I� I ..__1, i - _ _ _ •_��I� -rig_• ; ; � 5� a l �P • n LJ CITY OF RANCHO CU AN(IOWA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 5893 Acceptance of Map Parcel Map No. 5893 is a division of land on the northside of Victoria Avenue, 440 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue. The map was submitted by Robert F. Barton. Street improvement will be constructed or bonded, before building permits are issued. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution to authorize the City Engineer to forward the map for recordation. Respectfully submitted, i LBH:BK :jaa Attachments T£ TATNE FYIRCEC IC1AP /ltd 5893 /N THE CITY OF RAKCHO CLC'AMCWGA 647AU A SUBO,ISION OF A A7RTION OF LOT 13 BLOC( H ETMANLN COL. L AM8' AS RECORDED /N S&K 2 PAGE' OF F i AF /a £CORDS 6k SANSERNAROINO COUNTS, 5TA7E 0 J N LINE OF SOUTH 150'OFo / LOT 13, &ECK H, M.B. 2/14 try AST 9647 �~ QN qi FO IRON ROD _ H /GNL ANO AVER N 0 J N LINE OF SOUTH 150'OFo / LOT 13, &ECK H, M.B. 2/14 try AST 9647 �~ QN qi O HJ -- 3 FD. SPIKE GENERAL INFORMATION 25' B.SL. 1 I OL 471 EAST 7724.46' THE 517E 15 PRESENTLY VACANT; BOUNCED BY VACANT PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AAV SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ON AlE EAST AND WEST. THERE ARE SIX PALM TREES ON THE NORTH SIOf OF VICTORIA AVE. THAT WILL HAVE TO BE REMOVEO IF CURBS B GUTTERS ARE INSTALLED. PRESENT ZONING IS SINGLE FAMILY, (INCL. SURROUNDINGI PROPOSED LAND USE IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. r VICINITY MAP NO SCALE M SHEET / O frB., 1987 SCALE + / F0.2 "LP. , UTILITY NOTES F2 �Q v2Q � ohm H 3�b Q 4 V. R.R. SPIKE ED. NAIL J WATER GAS ANO ELECTRICAL SEM ARE AVAILABLE IN VICTORIA AVENL SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE BY SEP: TANK AND CESSPOOL. SURVEYOR PHIL K. MOSLEY 1733 E R05EN¢I9 Cr. ONTARIO, CA. 91764 041 994 -4702 PA CEL I o °o PARCEL 2 $ 2 •^ b °� /.i, 409 S.F /3 409 S.F O HJ -- 3 FD. SPIKE GENERAL INFORMATION 25' B.SL. 1 I OL 471 EAST 7724.46' THE 517E 15 PRESENTLY VACANT; BOUNCED BY VACANT PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AAV SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ON AlE EAST AND WEST. THERE ARE SIX PALM TREES ON THE NORTH SIOf OF VICTORIA AVE. THAT WILL HAVE TO BE REMOVEO IF CURBS B GUTTERS ARE INSTALLED. PRESENT ZONING IS SINGLE FAMILY, (INCL. SURROUNDINGI PROPOSED LAND USE IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. r VICINITY MAP NO SCALE M SHEET / O frB., 1987 SCALE + / F0.2 "LP. , UTILITY NOTES F2 �Q v2Q � ohm H 3�b Q 4 V. R.R. SPIKE ED. NAIL J WATER GAS ANO ELECTRICAL SEM ARE AVAILABLE IN VICTORIA AVENL SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE BY SEP: TANK AND CESSPOOL. SURVEYOR PHIL K. MOSLEY 1733 E R05EN¢I9 Cr. ONTARIO, CA. 91764 041 994 -4702 0 • 9 N STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 5892 Acceptance of Map Parcel Map No. 5892 is for the division of a one acre lot into two lots at the southwest corner of Hellman and Hillside. The map was submitted by Cynthia Prescher, owner /subdivider. The street improvements were installed by the owner and recently accepted by Public Works Inspection Staff. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution and authorize the City Engineer to forward the map for recording. Respectfully submitted, U � L/ LBH:JLM:jaa Attachment /b • • 9 11 M n . n� I ,...1� IICAMN STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Bond Extension GSO • 7 2 � C O F U 1977 The City Engineer is May of 1979 approved a waiver of Parcel Map for James Van Antewerp consisting of 2 lots on the east - side of Hellman north of Banyan. The conditions of approval included construction of street improvements in front of one of the lots. Mr. Van Antewerp has contacted the Engineering Staff indicating that he desires constructing the improvements in front of both lots with the sale of the smaller parcel (No. 1). The time allowed in the agreement to construct was about to run out and the City notified the owner to request an exten- sion. Mr. Van Antewerp has requested a 12 month time exten- sion with the commitment of doing the improvements in front of both lots. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that Council approve a 6 month extension and direct the City Clerk to notify Mr. Van Antewerp of the Council's action. Further, that the improvements must be in Within 6 months. Respectfully submitted, LBH:JLM:jaa Attachment 13. • • 0 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO .. N 'RE c,r °, 44"4, .,A,w64 - 13EIV& 4 VI✓IS16" or Piet EC I of pAgccZ MAP IJ3) AS f'ICD /I RAR'Cl MAP 8 11 Mle FZ C1.✓Y xce.gvM F SAN BERNAAeova• STITC OF CALIFORNIA, APRIL - /779 PARCEL I PARCEL 2 --17777) + • • r. roc D A &r r i A k, rA rI�O�Mn. Tract 9427 - wcafed on the North and South sides of Banyan Street between Hermosa and Haven OWNER: Lesny Development Co. P. 0. Box 5526 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Labor and Material Bond (Road) $53,000 Labor and Material Bond (Water) $19,500 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer) $20,500 Tract 8884 Located on the East and South sides of Red Hill Country Club Drive OWNER: Harnish, Morgan and Company 500 East "E" Street Ontario, California 91764 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer On -site) $ 6,500 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer Off0site) 21,000 Labor and Material Bond (Water) $21,000 Tract 9382 - Located on the Southeast corner of Base Line and Haven OWNER: Lesny /Wilshire Properties P. 0. Box 5526 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Labor and Material Bond (Road) $79,000 Tract 9617 - Located on the West side of Hellman North of Arrow Route OWNER: M. J. Brock S Sons, inc. 1698 Greenbriar Lane Suite 224 Brea, California 92621 Labor and Material Bond (Landscapine) $ 7,530 1� - -- STAff REI RT <�V + y7n O C F � 7 V DATE: July 16, 1980 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Consent Calendar - Release of Bonds Tract 9427 - wcafed on the North and South sides of Banyan Street between Hermosa and Haven OWNER: Lesny Development Co. P. 0. Box 5526 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Labor and Material Bond (Road) $53,000 Labor and Material Bond (Water) $19,500 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer) $20,500 Tract 8884 Located on the East and South sides of Red Hill Country Club Drive OWNER: Harnish, Morgan and Company 500 East "E" Street Ontario, California 91764 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer On -site) $ 6,500 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer Off0site) 21,000 Labor and Material Bond (Water) $21,000 Tract 9382 - Located on the Southeast corner of Base Line and Haven OWNER: Lesny /Wilshire Properties P. 0. Box 5526 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Labor and Material Bond (Road) $79,000 Tract 9617 - Located on the West side of Hellman North of Arrow Route OWNER: M. J. Brock S Sons, inc. 1698 Greenbriar Lane Suite 224 Brea, California 92621 Labor and Material Bond (Landscapine) $ 7,530 1� J July 11, 1980 T0: Mayor and City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga FROII: Douglas W. Ayres SUBJECT: City Manager Employment Agreement Attached hereto is the proposed employment agreement with Mr. Wasserman. At your Executive Session of June 18, you approved of this concept and instructed me to develop such an agreement. This approach to retention of your City Manager also was discussed and recommended in my report to you dated June 18, which was accepted by Council at that public meeting. The attached agreement is lifted almost verbatim from the model agreement prepared and published by the International City Management Association in its publication "Employment Guidelines for Urban Administration ". The only significant changes are: 1. Those which you approved in executive session and instructed me to include herein, and 2. The deferred compensation agreement language, also lifted essentially verbatim from the Council approved City deferred compensation plan with Glendale Federal Savings. I will be available to answer your question the afternoon and evening of your meeting at which this document will be considered -- July 16. I also will telephone you between the time you receive this and the meeting. Should you have any questions, 1 will be pleased to respond. DWA /vz lu J Ni . EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 16th day of July, 1980, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "employer" or "City ", of the one part, and LAUREN M. WASSERMAN, hereinafter called "employee, of the other part, both of whom understand as follows: WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires to retain in employment the services of said Lauren M. Wasserman as City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to provide certain benefits, establish certain conditions of employment, and to set working conditions of said employee; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council (1) to assure that the health of employee is adequate and is regularly verified by competent authority as adequate to continue in said position, (2) to provide a just means for terminating the services of employee at such time as he may be unable to discharge fully his duties due to disability or age or when the • City Council may desire to otherwise terminate his employ, (3) to assist in the maintenance of the health and well -being of employee, (4) to retain the services of employee and to provide inducement for him to remain in such employment, (5) to make possible full work productivity by assuring employee's morale, health, and peace of mind with respect to the future security of him and his family, (6) to act as a deterrent against malfeasance or dishonesty for personal gain on the part of employee and against morally questionable personal financial dealings, and (7) to establish a clear and mutually understood system of compensating employee so as to avoid future misunderstandings regarding either pay or fringe benefit treatment; and • WHEREAS, employee currently serves in said position as City Manager and the City Council wishes to retain said employee in said position; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. DUTIES City hereby agrees to employ said Lauren M. Wasserman as City Manager of said City to perform the duties and functions specified in the City Code 1'7 Employment Agreement -2- July 16, 1980 and to perform such other legally permissable and proper duties and functions • as the City Council shall from time to time assign. SECTION 2. TERM A. Employee agrees to remain in the exclusive employ of City until August 1, 1983, and neither to seek, to accept, nor to become employed by any other employer until after said date, unless said termination date is effected as hereinafter provided. B. The term "employed" shall not be construed to include occasional teaching, writing, lecturing, or consulting performed on employee's time off, provided said consulting in no way conflicts with or utilizes information vital to the interests of the City. C. Nothing in this agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of the City Council to terminate the services of employee at any time, subject only to the provisions set forth in Section 3 of this agreement. D. Nothing in this agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of employee to resign at any time from his position with the City, subject only to the provision set forth in Section 3, paragraph B, hereof. E. In the event the employment of the employee has not been terminated • prior to expiration date of this agreement and the City desires to continue to employ the employee, his employment shall continue after said expiration date upon the same terns and conditions as those in effect at said expiration date and until the City Council gives notice to employee of termination. In the event employee continues in employment after said expiration date, all benefit provisions of this agreement shall be paid to and /or apply for the benefit of employee at the time of termination, whenever that event may occur. SECTION 3. TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE PAY A. In the event employee is terminated by the City Council before expiration of the aforesaid term of employment and during such time that the employee is willing and able to perform the duties of City Manager, then, in that event, the City agrees to pay employee a lump sum cash payment equal to six (6) months' aggregate salary; provided, however, that in the event employee is terminated because of his conviction of any illegal act involving personal gain to him, then, in that event, the City shall have no obligation to pay the aggregate severance sum designated in this paragraph. B. In the event employee voluntarily resigns his position with the City after the expiration of the aforesaid tern of employment, then employee shall give the City sixty (60) days notice in advance. •0. M Employment Agreement -3- July 16, 1980 • C. In the event the City at any time during the employment term reduces the salary or other financial benefits of employee in a greater percentage than an applicable across - the -board reduction for all City employees, or in the event the City refuses, following written notice, to comply with any other provision benefiting employee herein, or the employee • resigns following a suggestion, whether formal or informal, by the City Council that he resign, then, in that event, employee may at his option, be deemed to be "terminated" at the date of such reduction or such refusal to comply within the meaning and context of the herein severance pay provision. SECTION 4. BASE ANNUAL SALARY A. City agrees to pay employee for his services rendered pursuant hereto a base annual salary set annually by resolution, payable in install- ments at the same time as other employees of the City are paid. B. City also agrees to increase said base salary and /or other ben- efits of employee in such amounts and to such an extent as the City Council may determine at its discretion, but no less frequently than an annual review of said employee made at the same time as similar consideration is given other employees generally. SECTION 5. HOURS OF WORK . A. Employee's schedule of work each day and week shall vary in accord- ance with the work required to be performed, including such time as necessary outside normal office hours. In recognition thereof, employee shall not be entitled, during his employment term, to receive overtime compensation for hours worked over forty (40) hours per week; provided, however, that compen- satory time off may be taken by employee at such time as he may select on an hour for hour basis. In connection therewith, employee shall cause records of time worked and compensatory time off taken to be maintained, and shall cause the same to be filed bi- monthly with the appropriate City officer. B. Employee shall not spend more than ten (10) hours per week in teaching, consulting, or other noncity- connected business without the express prior approval of the City Council, and shall not spend more than ten (10) hours per month involved in such activities without reporting same to the City Council. C. Employee nor his wife shall own any interest in any real property within the City limits with the exception of his personal dwelling, without first securing the express approval of the City Council. SECTION 6. AUTOMOBILE Employee's duties require that he shall have the exclusive and un- restricted use at all times during his employment with the City of an auto- mobile provided to him by the City. City shall be responsible for paying 17 Employment Agreement -4- July 16, 1980 for liability, property damage, and comprehensive insurance and for the • purchase, operation, maintenance, repair and regular replacement of said automobile. SECTION 7. DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS City agrees to budget and pay the professional dues and subscriptions of employee necessary for his continuation and full participation in national, regional, state, and local associations and organizations necessary and de- sirable for his continued professional participation, growth and advancement, and for the good of the City. SECTION 8. CIVIC CLUB MEMBERSHIP City recognizes the desirability of representation in and before local civic and other organizations, and employee is authorized to become a member of any appropriate civic clubs or organizations, for which City shall pay all expenses. Employee shall report to the Finance Director on each membership that he has taken out at City expense. SECTION 9. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT A. City hereby agrees to budget and pay all travel and subsistence expenses of employee for professional and official travel, meetings, and occasions adequate to continue the professional development of employee and • and to adequately pursue necessary official and other functions for City, including but not limited to the annual conference of the International City Management Association, the League of California Cities and all departments thereof, the National League of Cities, and such other national, regional, state and local governmental groups and committees thereof as employee shall serve as a member or shall determine to be of ability to and benefit of city and employee. B. City also agrees to budget and pay for the travel and subsistence expenses of employee for shortcourses, institutes, and seminars that are necessary for his professional development and for the good of the City. SECTION 10. GENERAL EXPENSES City recognizes that certain expenses of a non - personal and generally job - affiliated nature are incurred by employee, and hereby agrees to reimburse or to pay said general expenses, and the Finance Director is hereby authorized to disburse such monies upon receipt of duly executed expense or petty cash vouchers, receipts, statements, or personal affidavits. SECTION 11. PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS A. City recognizes its interest in the continued good health of employee, • ,go. Employment Agreement -5- duly 16, 1980 and agrees to pay all expenses for a comprehensive and annual physical exam- ination of employee, at a clinic in City of his choice. Provided, however, that a copy of the report of said physical examination shall be filed with the Mayor, for the private perusal of the City Council, and, if necessary, use of the personnel office of the City. SECTION 12. VACATION AND SICK LEAVE Employee shall be entitled to the same vacation and sick leave ben- efits as other executive management employees of the City. SECTION 13. DISABILITY, HEALTH, AND LIFE INSURANCE A. City agrees to continue to make required premium payments for employee for insurance policies for life, accident, sickness, disability in- come benefits providing full income if disabled, major medical and dependent's coverage, group insurance currently in force covering employee and his depen- dents. B. City agrees to purchase and pay premiums on whole life insurance policies equal in amount to three times the annual salary of employee, with employee to name beneficiary thereof. C. City agrees to provide and to pay the premium on hospitalization, • surgical, comprehensive medical, and dental care insurance for employee and his dependents as done for other employees of the City. n D. The City shall provide travel insurance for employee while he is traveling on City business, with employee to name beneficiary thereof. SECTION 14. DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT A. In addition to the said base salary set out in Section 4 hereof, City agrees to set aside additional sums equal to fifteen per cent (15%) of the said base salary or $7,500, whichever is lesser and to invest said set aside sums in the deferred compensation plan. (1) Employer and Employee agree that Employer has provided the Employee with a current copy of the Plan. (2) Employee hereby elects to become a participant in the Plan and to defer payments pursuant to the plan as follows: Employee agrees that his rights to the deferred compensation shall be governed by all terms and conditions of the Plan. The Employee designates his investment objective to be savings and and loan accounts. Employer may recognize this objective, but is not required hereby to do so, a1. Employment Agreement -6- July 16, 1980 (3) Under Section 7 of the Plan, the Employee elects the following • distribution of benefits: (4) At Retirement Lump Sum _% Installments payable over __ years % (not to exceed 15 years) Monthly i Quarterly _ Annually Installments payable for Years of Life Expectancy (Plumber of years determined by Standard American mortality tables) Monthly _ Quarterly Annually Annuity (monthly) _% _ 10 years certain & life annuity — Single life annuity Postpone distribution (election k_) to age (5) At Other Termination (except total disability) Lump Sum % . Installments payable monthly over _years _% (not to exceed — 10 years) Postpone distribution (election #_) to age (6) At Total Permanent Disability Lump Sum ____% Installments payable monthly over _years _% (not to exceed '— 15 years) Life Annuity (monthly) (7) At Death to Beneficiary Lump Sum % Installments payable over _ years ,% Flonthly Quarterly Annually • aa. Employment Agreement -7- July 16, 1980 • Annuity (Monthly) % Life Annuity 120 months certain & life U B. In the event employee accepts employment with another employer and such other employer shall desire to make the payments into said deferred compensation plan, then the employer may at its discretion transfer ownership of employee's share of said program to the new employer. C. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, in the event the services of the employee are at any time terminated because of employee's commission of any legal act involving personal gain to him, then, in that event, employee shall forfeit all future rights in and to such deferred com- pensation plan and the benefits thereof, and employer shall retain all legal and beneficial ownership of said deferred compensation free and clear of employee, his successors, heirs or assigns. D. It is mutually understood and agreed that the right to the monies which may accrue under said deferred compensation plan pursuant to this agreement shall not be subject to sale, encumbrance, hypothecation, assignment, transfer, or levy under a writ of execution, or attachment so long as the employee remains in the employment of employer. E. The City's obligation to pay into said deferred compensation plan shall terminate upon transfer of said benefits to employee or another employer hereunder, or in the event of employee losing his rights to said policies and benefits pursuant to the terms hereof. F. Employee shall have the right to designate the beneficiary or beneficiaries who will receive, in the event of his death, any benefits to which he is entitled under the Plan. Employee reserves the right to change or revoke the beneficiary designation without notice to any beneficiary. SECTION 15. NORMAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Employee shall be covered by the Public Employees' Retirement System in the same manner as other City employees and City shall pay into said system on behalf of employee in the same manner as for other employees of the City. SECTION 16. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT A. The City Council shall fix any such other terms and conditions of employment, as it may determine from time to time, relating to the performance by employee of the position of City Manager, provided such terms and conditions are not inconsistent with or in conflict with the provisions of this agreement, tho City Code, or any other law. B. All provisions of the City Code, and regulations and rules of City relating to vacation and sick leave, retirement and social security system a3. Employment Agreement -8- July 16, 1980 contributions, holidays and other fringe benefits and working conditions as • they now exist or hereafter may be amended, also shall apply to employee as they would to other employees of the City, in addition to said benefits enumerated specifically for the benefit of employee, except as herein provided. SECTION 17. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs at law and executors of employee. B. This agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution. C. If any provision of this agreement shall be held invalid, the remainder shall nevertheless be deemed valid and effective, and it is the intention of the parties hereto that each provision hereof is being stipulated separately in the event one or more of such provisions should be held invalid. D. The text herein shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties. E. This agreement shall become effective comencing July, 1980. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has caused this agree- ment to be signed and executed in its behalf by its Mayor, and duly attested by its Deputy City Clerk, and the employee has signed and executed this agree- • ment, both in duplicate, the day and year first above written. Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: California DeputT City Clerl; (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORII: City Attorney Lauren Id. Wasserman Employee • a V. u `0 pY av nor delaeh— Return ell ropisv Oe Nor Writ. Abev. Thk Liu —la, NeodyuvrM1n OrF.p Only APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICEN$E(S) 1. TYPES) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO. To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control FEE NO, 1215 O Street GEOGRAPHICAL Sacramento, Calif, 95814 rplprem..pnvrne cor..Ie.vl CODE 1615 The undersigne d hereby applies for O8P ML 27M 5 .1LM (30) ) Date licenses described as {allows: Issued Temp. Permit 2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) Applied under Sec. 24044 ❑ Swt7tisnd Cairooration. '"he Effective Date: .1/1 -/'10 Effective Date: 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION($) FEE LIC. TYPE -r $ 4S1C�'C SICr! nme.of,BasiTbci .More '^ 20 C!s �GNl1s s iQF� ix 5. Location of Bufiness— Number and 5freet .. CUs ,:2L3L4Wlbt i ��' 9 �! R 0612 f..ar elian {v_nntee yi 1$! _ City and Zip Cade • County "a�"oin ?di RECEIPT 10 TOTAL _ $ i8nCh0 !:ti_:a San'P.L IrdiT. NO. -s.7ry '6. If Premises Licensed, ! 7. Are Premises Inside Show Tvoe of license City Limits? 8. Mailing Address Of differed Or.. S)— Number and Street It.mpl (P.rm) °. D. :foz §_C'1 !.naheip. '1 9 ?nDA __ _____ = IX 1. _ 9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Department per. taining to the Act? I. 11, Espl YES" answer to items 9 or 10 -or an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. 12 AppIIIN agrnes (a) that an mono r employed in on sale licensed remises will have all the y ge p qualiRc a of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisons of Ihe AI<oho H< Bavera,a Central Ad. 3. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of r)ranZa Data June 17. 10ri0 under any pl a11 nM1a, tignu n M1Ylow r.r.e, pnd '1 N. In, ppplir el dl, pplrr r .&1' .torn. ppinorn pryer m.tl Ibe Inr rngp npplit drlr uS.1r dy m l,. Ilrrr ...1 r • benell, 11 fe nor .od .1.l1 . ewnp epp"I" .10 rI I1.reel nndfI —Sr .11 In. a II.r I.d. .1 "1 tool per arb.r It.. ppplite r that � y s- •Inde . In. ep..... pplrr belie n bn endull.d under r n Ipr -h'Ih 111. W.I made; (U rnm In. r m(II'appnr.n.. a npoud tI mbr m ,1, 1 a1 a 1p p a IpmII a aprt.menl . red rn Inen n 00' d yr w.vMSne p1". d.y' en n',rn In. Ire .", npplrrp.... Ir I....d .ern In. IS. .1 1. Open aIev,,h a pr.ler.... rn I Iorlee red.rpr pl naml.�rerypr 1. lid er inlm"urC l.G1�J..� 'a'NW ISII IFS.1191 Jr pppinunpn met be vrmd.nm'n by i'Fer me pvpllmnl pr It. nlluman +Jn ne rnuhine I'rabilib I 14 PLICANT ,_,r, al p SIGN HERE' ^.1 'JdlI dA r St. JicT. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C�c MEMORANDUM July 10, 1980 l TO: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager H FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Replacement of Assistant Planner by Associate Planner One of the Planning Division's Assistant Planners has just resigned to take a new position in Northern California. This position was originally an "Associate Planner" classification when first authorized. However, upon Management's own initiative, we had reclassified that Position to "Assistant Planner" on the basis of better relating the position to ac- tual work performance. Now that the individual holding the position is moving on to a new job, I am requesting reinstatement of the originally budgeted portion of last year. Cost savings can be incurred since we are currently recruiting for another Associate Planner position and we can recruit from the same list rather than advertising twice, one for Associate and one for an Assistant. Furthermore, because of salary savings, there would be no change whatsoever in the budget requested • for the cu71ent fiscal year. JFC M I I , Q_irec6r of Community Development JL:jk a� E • 0 y1: .: July 9, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Request Authorization to attend NRPA Conference In the current adopted budget, $300 is shown for attendance of the CPRS conference in Sacramento in March 181. Request authorization to change to NRPA Conference in Phoenix in October 180. Reason for the change of plans is a study of the recently received agenda of the NRPA conference. The program presents a significant number of sessions and topics useful to our program. (While the CPRS conference has been budgeted in 178 and 179, we have not attended, as the scheduled programs were "somewhat lacking" in substance.) As the travel, mileage and hotel rates are comparable between Phoenix and Sacramento, little change in fiscal impact on the budgeted amount is expected. Request agenda item on July 16 for Council consideration. B11/mw a-7. CITY OF RANCID CLr-AM -K A STAFF REPORT o July 10, 1980 _ 1 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Subject: N.I.C.D. request for additional funding In the attached self explanatory letter, Dr. Navarro requests an additional $1,120 above the $11,000 previously granted by Council. Dr. Navarro wishes Council consideration of this request on 7/16/80. In an effort to expedite this item, which has been covered in depth by Council previously, it will be placed on consent calendar. Should further discussion be required, it would need be removed from consent calendar. Staff Recommendation: In light of previous action by the City, it would seem appropriate to grant request of additional $1,120. . Discussion with Finance Department indicates fund sources are available. If you have any questions, please see me. BH/ • as National Institute for Community Development Dr. Armando Navarro Execuiiue Director 894 W. Rialto Avenue San Bemardino, CA 92410 714- 888 -0207 July 9, 1900 To the Rancho Cucamonga city council: The National Institute for Community Development would like to clarify a misinterpretation of the request for personnel salary presented before the council two weeks ago. At the meeting Dr. Navarro made a presentation requesting $11,n00 for the project manaaer Arturo Ayala for Project ?speranza in Cucamonga. The $11,000 figure was Presented as a gross salary for Mr. Ayala. The figure did not include the "employer's share" of ll% which amounts to $1,130.00. This amount, as you know, must he naid in taxes at the federal and state level and includes workman's compensation. I'm sure you realize our budget is very limited and we cannot afford to nay the emnloyer's share from other sources. At the same time you will agree that Mr. Ayala is a very competent, industrious • wor!,er, often nutting many extra hours in community work. His full time effort is certainly worth $11,nn0 annually and to take llt of this away from his salary would be an injustice to his contributions. n LI Thus we are requesting an additional 119 or $1,1 10 to cover the employer's share. Thank you for your support and understanding. Sincerely, li Or. Armanro Navarro -- a9• ORDINANCE NO. 113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY OF RANCHO • CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1062 - 401 -11 FROM R- 1- 20,000 TO B -1- 10,000 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BANYAN AND AMETHYST STREETS. The City Council of the City of.Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property herein- after described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. • SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. R- 1- 20,000 (single family residential on minimum 20,000 sq. ft. lots) to R- 1- 10,000 (single family residential on minimum 10,000 sq, ft. lots). Said Property is located on the southeast corner of Amethyst and Banyan Streets known as Assessor's Parcel Number 1062- 401-11 SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor 36 iren e an,',iT`iv ['lPrr CITY OF RANIaU CUCANIONGA SFAFF REPORT DATE: July 2, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer 6�'kt i.'O'L c /// SUBJECT: An Ordinance Establishing special Drainage Impact Area Attached for Council execution is an Ordinance designating the area north of the Santa Fe Railroad to Arrow Route between Milliken Avenue and Haven Avenue as a Special Drainage Impact Area. The Ordinance requires that prior to the issuance of a Building Permit within the area, the applicant will be required to submit a detailed hydrologic study demonstrating the extent of drainage impact and proposed mitigation measures. The Ordi- nance requires that the City Engineer make findings that the project will not adversely impact the drainage situation in the area. Where temporary retention basins are utilized as a mitigation measure, a maintenance agreement will be required and a minimum $2,000 security deposit posted. The Ordinance also modifies the drainage fee Ordinance No. 75 to require full payment of drainage fees for the developed area on any parcel prior to issuance of a building permit for any additions. This is accomplished by deleting Section 4 (c) (3) from Ordinance No. 75 (see attached copy) for the impact area only. RECO14MEMOATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 111 establishing the area north of the Santa Fe Railroad to Arrow Route between the alignment of Milliken Avenue and Haven Avenue. Respectfully submitted, i LBH: jaa Attachments E P • ORDINANCE NO. 111 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT ZONE NORTH OF THE SANTA FE RAILROAD TO 4RROW ROUTE BETWEEN HAVEN AND MILLIKEN AVENUES, AND REQUIRING DETAILED ENGINEERING STUDIES AND MITIGATION MEASURES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose In recognition of the existence of unique drainage problem creating potential hazards to public health, safety, and property, the City Council deems it appropriate to establish that portion of the City bounded by: "The Santa Fe Railroad on the south, Arrow Route on the north, Haven Avenue on the west, and the alignment of Milliken Avenue on the cast" as a Special Drainage Impact Zone requiring special engineering studies and mitigations measures as a condition of the issuance of a building permit. SECTION 2: Drainage Study Requirements The City Council finds that prior to the issuance of a Building permit within the Special Impact Zone boundary described in Section 1, the applicant is hereby required to submit for approval of the City Engineer a comprehensive hydrology study prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. This study shall contain the following: Analysis of existing drainage patterns and runoff quantities on the site. 2. The existing ultimate discharge point of site runoff and the general downstream path of runoff. 3. The proposed drainage patterns and increases in runoff quantities generated by site development. 4. Proposed mitigation measures to prevent the discharge of increased storm runoff from the site including proposed construction of master plan facilities sufficient to mitigate downstream damage. ' 5. Any other information required by the City Engineer to determine the full drainage impacts of the proposed development. I Ordinance No. 111 Page 2 SECTION 3: Findings Required for Building Permit Issuance No building permit shall be issued for a structure within the Special Impact Zone unless the City Engineer has made the following findings: 1. That the proposed project will not increase storm runoff from the site except where Master Plan Drainage facilities exist to accept said runoff. 2. That the project by reasons of low -flow non -storm related water will not create a public nuisance. 3. That the project will not divert or concentrate flows in such a manner as to adversely effect downstream properties. To insure this finding, the City Engineer may require a drainage acceptance letter or easement from the adjacent downstream property. 4. That where on -site retention facilities have been proposed a sufficient maintenance contract has been executed and security posted to insure proper maintenance of said facility. Minimum security for maintenance shall be $2,000 or such other higher amount as set by the City Council upon recommendation of the City Engineer. 5. That all facilities proposed are in conformance with City standards for design and construction. These findings will be made subject to conditions established by the City Engineer based upon the findings of the approved Drainage Study. SECTION 4: Security for Construction of Required drainage Improvements Where the findings required by Section 3 are based on conditions requiring the construction of drainage improvements, no building permit shall be issued until an agreement and bonds, letters of credit, cash deposit, or other acceptable form of security have been posted and accepted by the City Council to insure the construction of required facilities. SECTION 5: Drainage Fee Provisions (a) Where a building permit is sought for in addition to existing development within the Special Drainaqe Zone, the building permit shall not be issued until drainage fees under the provisions of City Ordinances have been paid for the entire developed area of the site. The developed area shall be as defined in Section 4(c)(2) of Ordinance 75 and shall be determined by the Building Official. 33 • 0 lI Page 3 (b) Within the Special Drainage Impact Zone, the • provision of Section 3(c)(3) of Ordinance No. 75 shall not apply. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: • Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor 34f 0 • le o /)j kb w, CITY OF RANCHO CU ANKXJC,A STAFF REPORT DATE: July 2, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Increase for Industrial Storm Drain Fee Attached for Council execution is an Ordinance to adopt the revised industrial area storm drain plan for the area bounded by the City limits on the South, Foothill Boulevard on the North and lying between Deer and Day Creeks. In addition, the Ordinance will raise storm drain fees within the area from $2,500 /acre to $4,600 /acre. The raised fee reflects actual increases in the cost of providing the proposed system. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt Ordinance 112 adopting the Industrial Area Master Plan of Drainage and establishing a fee of $4,500 per acre with the drainage area. Respectfully submitted, ' i�GvL`u7 LBH: jas Attachments ORDINANCE NO. 112 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA, MAKING ORDINANCE NO. 75 APPLICABLE THERETO, AND ESTABLISHING A DRAINAGE FEE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose. Since the adoption of Ordinance No. 75, the City has caused additional drainage studies to be made within the City. These studies have now identified certain areas within the City where special drainage problems exist, and with respect to which the cost of planned drainage facilities to provide proper drainage are higher, on a per acre basis, than in the rest of the City. Accordingly, the City Council deems it appropriate to establish that portion of the City Bounded by: "Deer Creek on the west, Day Creek on the east, the south City limit, and on the north by the Centerline of Foothill Boulevard as a separate local drainage area to be known as the "industrial local • drainage area ". The City Council further finds and determines that the remaining territory of the City shall remain one local drainage area subject to all of the provisions of Ordinance No, 75. 9 SECTION 2: Drainage Plan and Industrial Local Drainage Area. The comprehensive storm drain plans, the index thereto and the appropriate plan sheets for the industrial local drainage area together with construction costs and other related material, which documents entitled Industrial Area Drainage Master Plan prepared by L.D. King are hereby found and declared to be the drainage plan for the industrial local drainage area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For the Purposes of this Ordinance, planned drainage facilities shall mean drainage facilities contained within the drainage plan. The City Council finds that drainage problems are approximately of equal magnitude in all areas of the industrial local drainage area. SECTION 3: Provisions of Ordinance No. 75 Made Applicable. All provisions of Ordinance No. 75, except the provisions of Section 2 thereof, and except as otherwise amended by this Ordinance, shall be applicable to the industrial local drainage area, Where the context so requires, the term "local drainage area" shall include the "industrial local drainage area ". 3�0 W _ .._. 112 Page 2 SECTION 4: Amount of Fee. • (a) The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance with respect to land within the industrial local drainage area is $46 per one hundreth (100th) of an acre or fraction thereof. SECTION 5: Exemptions. No fee shall be required pursuant to this Ordinance for any land within the industrial local drainage area upon which there has been levied an assessment in connection with an improvement district formed on or after the effective date of this Ordinance for the construction of drainage facilities. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteeen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newpaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Phillip D. Schlosser, idayor Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 37 • ORDINANCE NO. 110 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION AND DELEGATING ADMINISTRATION THEREOF TO THE CITY MANAGER. WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore by resolution enacted certain personnel policies and compensation rules; and, WHEREAS, the said previous resolutions were not all encompassing and it appears to be both desirable and necessary to develop a compre- hensive system governing the administration of all personnel matters within the City government; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of implementing the most modern and effective system of personnel administration possible and such system has now been developed and has heretofore been reviewed by said City Council, which is desirous of fully implementing such system; and, WHEREAS, such system is deemed to be in essential compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, rulings and regulations governing fair, equal and bias -free public personnel administration and • management, hiring, promotion and other such personnel practices; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Manager is hereby delegated the following powers, authority and/or duties: 1. to develop, adopt, review, revise and readopt a position classification plan encompassing all categories of appointed city employees. 2. to develop, adopt, review, revise and readopt comprehensive personnel rules, forms and procedures governing the details of all personnel administration and management encompassing all categories of appointed city employees. 1. to develop, review, revise, survey and to recommend to the City Council for its adoption a salary plan encompassing all categories of appointed city employees and to administer such plan after adoption by the City Council. 4. to act as City Personnel Officer and to have the authority to delegate such duties inherent therein to a management employee as he shall deem appropriate, in whole or in part, by issuance of appropriate administrative orders. 39 No. 110 page 2 5. to keep the Council informed of changes affecting major personnel policy, the City employee force or personnel impacts an the Community. 6. to determine the pay of designated management employees . within minimums and maximums as set by Council resolution provided, however, any such pay change for any such management employee is reported to the Council in executive session, together with the reasons why such pay adjustment is to be made and how such individual employee's personal performance and qualifications warrant such pay rate change. SECTION 2: The City Manager shall be covered by said rules and regulations as they may apply to perquisites, fringe benefits and working conditions except that the City Council may enter into an employment agreement with the City Manager to expand, clarify, supplement, define and restrict such benefits as it shall deem appropriate, including, but Put limited to the following: (a) termination pay, (b) personal use of city vehicle, (c) City -paid deferred compensation at a percentage of base pay greater than that provided to other management employees, (d) additional sick leave, vacation and conference attendance, (e) revised working hours in recognition of the exigencies of the position, (f) meritorious and longevity pay and bonuses, (g) supplemental retirement benefits, and (h) other benefits and perquisites peculiar to the office of City Manager. • SECTION 3: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be uncon- stitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional. SECTION 4: Resolution numbers 79 -48 and 79 -49 are hereby repealed. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dailv Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: "J�� _ �, • ATTEST: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor Lauren M. Wasserman, City Cie-r _37 ORDINANCE NO. 66 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 66 PERTAINING TO THE INELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY THE CITY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1; Section 1 of Ordinance No. 66 of the City is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 1: No person convicted (including pleas of guilty and nolo contendre) of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude shall be eligible for employment by any department of the City; provided, however, the appointing authority shall disregard such conviction if it is found and determined by such appointing authority that mitigating circumstances exist, such as, but not limited to, evidence of rehabilitation, the length of time elapsed since such conviction, the age of such person at the time of the conviction, or the • fact that the classification applied for is unrelated to such conviction. ". SECTION 2; The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to he published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of ,1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Nasserman, City Clerk yo Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 14 AND ORDINANCE NO. 18. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Ordinance No. 14 of the City is hereby repealed. SECTION 2: Ordinance No. 18 of the City is hereby repealed. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation publishedd in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • KASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this )jr E� day of t, , 1980. I AYES - NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST City Clerk • y/ Mayor AN ORDI14ANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING GEN- ERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND • OTHER CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: (a) Any person violating any of the provisions or failing to comply with any of the mandatory requirements of the Ordinances of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, unless the violation is made an infraction by Ordinance. (b) Except in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by any Ordinance of the City, any person convicted of a misdemeanor for violation of an Ordi- nance of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, is punishable by a fine of not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), or by imprisonment not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprison- ment. (c) Any person convicted of an infrac- tion for violation of an Ordinance of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, is punishable • by: (1) A fine not exceeding Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for a first violation; (2) A fine not exceeding One Hun- dred Dollars ($100.00) for a second violation of the same Ordinance or code within one (1) year; and, (3) A fine not exceeding Two Hun- dred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) for each additional violation of the same Ordinance or code within one (1) year. (d) Each such person shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of the Ordinances of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of,. the City, is committed, continued or permitted by any sucA person, and he shall be punishable accordingly. (e) In addition to the penalties pro- vided for by this Ordinance, or elsewhere by Ordinance or by any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of the Ordinances of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, shall be d,.emed a public nuisance and may be abated by the City, and each day such condition continues shall be regarded as a new and separate offense. (f) In any civil action commenced by the City to abate a public nuisance, to enjoin a violation y'7 of any provision of any Ordinance of the City, or any code . adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, the City shall be entitled to recover from the defendant(s) in any such action reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PA SED APPROVED and ADOPTED this Ar 91i day of �c. , 1980. AYE61 NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk 113 • ORDINANCE NO. 116 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR USE IN THE INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF ALL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NOW EXISTING OR HEREAFTER ENACTED. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Definitions. The following words and phrases, whenever used in the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, shall be construed as defined in this section unless from the context a different meaning is intended or unless a different meaning is specifically defined and more particularly directed to the use of such words or phrases: (a) "City" and "town" each mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, or the area within the territorial limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and such territory outside of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, over which the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has jurisdiction or control by virtue of any constitutional or statutory provision. (b) "Council" means the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calfiornia. "All its members" or "all councilmen" means the total number of councilmembers holding office. (c) "County" means the County of San Bernardino, California. (d) "Law" denotes applicable federal law, the Constitution and statutes of the State of California, the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California and when appropriate, any and all rules and regulations which may be promulgated thereunder. (e) "May" ! �- emissive. (f) "Month" means a calendar month. (g) "Must" and "shall" are each mandatory. (h) 'bath" includes an affirmation or declaration in all cases in which, by law, an affirmation may be substituted for an oath, and in such cases the words "swear" and "sworn" shall be equivalent to the words "affirm" and "affirmed ". (i) 'Owner ", applied to a building or land, includes any part owner, joint owner, tenant in common, joint tenant, tenant by the entirety, of the whole or a part of such building or land. yy NO. 110 Page 2 (j) "Person" includes a natural person, joint venture, joint stock company, partnership, association, club, company, • corporation, business, trust, organization, or the manager, lessee, agent, servant, officer or employee of any of them. (k) "Personal property' includes money, goods, chattels, things in action and evidences of debt. (1) "preceding" and "following" mean next before and next after, respectively. property. (m) "Property" includes real and personal and hereditamen[s. (n) "Real property' includes lands, tenements (o) "Sidewalk" means that portion of a street between the curbline and the adjacent property line intended for the use of pedestrians. (p) "State" means the State of California. (q) "Street" includes all streets, highways, avenues, lanes, alleys, courts, places, squares, curbs, or other public ways in this City which have been or may hereafter be dedicated and open to public use, or such other public property so designated in any law of this State. (r) "Tenant" and occupant ", applied to a building or land, include any person who occupies the whole or a part of such building or land, whether alone or with others. (s) "Written" includes printed, typewritten, mimeographed, multigraphed, or otherwise reproduced in permanent visible form. SECTION 2: Title of Office. Use of the title of any officer, employee, department, board or commission means that officer, employee, department, board or commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. SECTION 3: Interpretation of Language. All words and phrases shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the language, but technical words and phrases and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in the law shall he construed and understood according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning. 1 ys Ordinance No. 116 Page 3 SECTION 4: Grammatical Interpretation. The following grammatical rules shall apply in the Ordinances of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga, California, unless it is apparent from the context that a different construction is intended: (a) Gender. Each gender includes the masculine, feminine and neuter genders. (b) Singular and Plural. The singular number includes the plural and the plural includes the singular. (c) Tenses. Words used in the present tense include the past and the future tenses and vice versa, unless manifestly inapplicable. SECTION 5: Acts by Agents. When an act is required by an Ordinance, the same being such that it may be done as well by an agent as by the principal, such requirement shall be construed to include all such acts performed by an authorized agent. SECTION 6: Prohibited Acts Include Causing and Permitting. Whenever in the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, any act or omission is made unlawful, it shall include causing, allowing, permitting, aiding, abetting, suffering, or concealing the fact of such act or omission. SECTION 7: Computation of Time. Except when otherwise • provided, the time within which an act is required to be done shall be computed by excluding the first day and including the last day, unless the last day is Sunday or a holiday, in which case it shall also be excluded. SECTION 8: Consturction. The provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and all proceedings under them are to be construed with a view to effect their objects and to promote justice. SECTION 9: Repeal Shall Not Revive Any Ordinances. The repeal of an Ordinance shall not repeal the repealing clause of any Ordinance or revive any Ordinance which has been repealed thereby. SECTION 10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: ATTEST: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor Lauren M. Wasserman, City clerk Y4 L • [J QTY OF RANCHO CU ANMCA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 v TO: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Revision to Ordinance 28 and 58 making provisions for postponement of street improvements Attached for Council approval are Ordinances 28 -A and 58 -B making provisions to allow mechanisms for the Council to postpone improvements currently required to be constructed under existing Ordinances. Where the postponement is approved by the Council a lien agreement will be required to insure future construction of improvements at such time that construction becomes feasible. The Ordinances are general in nature allowing full discretion on the part of the Council. Appeals for postponement will be analyzed by the Staff for recommendation to the Planning Commission who shall forward a recommendation to the Council for final determination. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve Ordinances 28 -A and 58 -B. Respectfully submitted, LH:b Attachments Y7 ORDINANCE NO. 28 -A • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUB - SECTION (f) OF SECTION 2.12 OF ORDINANCE NO. 28 TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS BE CON- STRUCTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF NINE (9) NONIRS FOLLOWING THE RECORDATION OF A PARCEL MAP FOR EACH LOT UPON WHICH THERE EXISTS A BUILDING OR OTHER USABLE STRUCTURE AT THE TIME OF SUCH RECORDATION. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Sub - section (f) of Section 2.12 of Ordinance No. 28 is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City Council hereby finds that it is necessary for reasons of public health and safety that all off -site improvements be constructed within a period of nine (9) months following the recordation of a parcel map for each lot on which there exists a building or other usable structure at the time of such recordation. The foregoingg provisions not withstanding, the City • Council 'V receipt f a recommendation from L, the Plan ng Commissio may postpone the construction �- of off -site improvemen to such later time as it .� t shall, at its discretion, determine. 1' "No postponement of construction shall be granted by the City Council unless the owner of the subject,parcel shall agree in , writing to construc*equired off -site improve- ment at such future time as shall then or 1 ' therdafter be determined by the City Council. Said contract shall create a lien upon the property to be divided as security for the performance of said agreement. Any such written contract and lien agreement shall be recorded with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County immediately subsequent to the recordation of the subject parcel map. ". SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Oai1y Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. . AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, —aye ATTEST: YP ORDINANCE NO. 58 -B AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 58 TO PER- MIT THE USE OF LIEN AGREEMENTS AS SECURITY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 6 of Ordinance No. 58 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 6. Construction of Public Improvements - Prerequi- site to Approval of the Building official. "(a) Except as provided in Section 5, the Building Official shall deny issuance of a building permit, or deny approval for occupancy or deny final approval and acceptance for public utility connections to any building or parking lot until required full frontage improvements exist, or are constructed or their construction is guaranteed by an executed agreement and cash money deposited with the City in a sum approved by the City Engineer based upon one - and -one -half (1 -1/2) times the estimated cost of construction. • (b) In the event construction of full frontage improvements is not required to be completed within six (6) months after the issuance of the building permit, the City Engineer may, at his option, require that a lien upon the property to be improved be created by contract between the owner and the City as security for the performance by the owner of the construction guarantee agreement instead of a cash deposit. In the event a lien agreement is required pursuant to this section, no building permit shall be issued until said lien agreement is recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ". SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk all cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ATTEST: Phillip p D. Schlosser, Mayor 1'auren Wasserman, City er yq 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM July 9, 1980 TO: City Council /City Manager FROM: Finance Director SUBJECT: Revenue Sharing As we are all aware, the Revenue Sharing Program will expire at the end of the current entitlement period (E,P. 11). While no payments after October 1980 are currently authorized, the present administration has before the Congress a proposal for a five -year re- authorization of payments to local governments. As can be anticipated, the administration proposal carries with it a number of modifications; modifications aimed at changing the al- location formula. Due to adjustments in population for Rancho Cucamonga, the Revenue Sharing allocation has been increased by $28,375.00 to give the City a total of $212,615.00. It is recommended to appropriate Revenue Sharing in its entirety to support the contract requirements of the Sheriffs Department. With rising costs and the addition of staff, and with recent leg- islation such as Proposition 13 and Proposition 4, it becomes exceedingly difficult to find alternate revenue sources to support the very basics of programs such as the Sheriff contract provides. It seems that it may be appropriate to keep Revenue Sharing in the single program that it currently supports. Should Revenue Sharing end the City will be faced with seeking alternate financing for only the one program as opposed to trying to finance several. 56 1977 0 W CITY OF RANUiO CUCAWNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1960 UL TO: city council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Award of "North Town" Street Improvement Project On July 8, 1990, bids were received on the "North Town" Street Improvement project. The low bidder was Robert Escudero, Inc. at $297,134.22. The Engineer's estimate for the project was $330,000.00. The Staff has analyzed the bids and finds them correct and acceptable. Mr. Escudero recently completed the Base Line (FAU) project end proved to be a cooperative and competent contractor. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council award the "North Town" Street Improvement project to Robert Escudero, Inc. at $297,134.22 plus a 10% contingency and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute contracts on their behalf. Respectfully submitted, ti /, LBH: jaa Attachment 17 • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SU'[MARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT "NORTH TOWN" STRFFT ANO ORATNA &F IMPROVEMENTS DATE JUL LOCATION CONTRACT N ITeTS QUANTITIES Robert Escudero Inc Matich CorDoratioi Flem no Eno. ENGINE Bid Amount Bid I Amount Bid I Amoun[ Bid I Amount Bi Bidder's Bond 1 Clearing & grubbing L.S. 3,000.0 13,000.00 !6,000.0026,000.00 7,862.2737,B62.37 48,000.00 48,000.0 2 Earthwork 1600 C. . 29.8147,696.00 24.0 138,400.00 8.00 12,800.00 6.00 9,600.0 3 P.C.C. rolled curb & gutter 273 L.F. 6.4E 1,763.58 6.0 1,638.00 6.00 1,638.00 7.@0 1,911.0 4 P.C.C. curb & gutter 9485 L. I. 6.4 61,273.10 6.10 57,858.50 6.95 65,920.75 7.110 66,395.0 5 P.C.C. sidewalk 37142 S.F. 1.2;47,170.34 1.6 59,427.20 1.50 55,713.00 2. 0 74,284.0 6 A.C. paving 1508 Tons 29.3 44,184.40 30.0 45,240.00 32.00 48,256.00 32. 0 48,256.0 7 P.C.C. drive approach 18236 S F. 1.5E28,265.80 2.0 36,472.00 2.00 36,472.00 2. 0 43,766.4 8 P.C.C. alley approach 1720 S. I. 3.2 5,504.00 2.7 4,730.00 2.35 4,042.00 2. 0 4,128.0 9 R.C. berm, placement 585 L.F 1.8 1,082.25 2.0 1,170.00 2.06 1,205.10 4. 0 2,340.0 10 A.C. drainage swale & conne tion to existing drain pipe 125 S.F 5.0 630.00 6.01 756.00 7.00 882.00 2. 0 252.0 11 Type "L" or Type "K" marker 10 EA 30.0 300.00 40.01 400.00 27.00 270.00 35. 0 350.0 12 Raising manholes to grade 8 EA 190.0 1,520.00 40 0.01 3,200.00 350.00 2,800.00 200. 0 1,600.0 13 4" cast iron drain pipe 178 L.F 11.0 1,958.00 13.0 2,314.00 15.00 2,670.00 12.0 2,136.0 14 12" CMP, 16 gage 37 L.F. 65.0 2,405.00 125.0 4,625.00 40.0 1,480.00 30.0 1,110.0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUPZMRY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROTECT "NORTH TOWN" STRFFT ANn DRAINAGE 1MPROVFMFNTS DATE JULY LOCATIOa CONTRACT NO. IT@tS QUANTITIES Robert Escudero,Inc Matich Corporatior Flenmin En ENGINE S Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Bidder's Bond 15 Catch basin, Type "A" 1 EA 2200.00 2,200.00 3000.00 3,000.00 1500.0 1,500.00 1500. 1,500.00 16 P.C.C. Cross gutter 6snandra 4546 S.F. 3.75 17,047.50 2.75 12,501.50 3.0 13,638.00 2.41 10,910.40 17 P.C.C. driveway transitions 2107 S.F. 3.75 7,901.25 2.0q 4,214.00 2.0 4,214.00 2.4 5.056.80 18 Asphalt concrete driveway, transitions, placement only 7842 S F. 1.50 11,763.00 1.00 7,842.00 .8 6,665.70 1.0 7,842.00 19 Concrete block wall 35 L.F. 42.00 1,470.00 30.00 1,050.00 28.0 980.00 16.0 560.00 a 297,134.22 310,838.20 299,008.92 330,000.00 Ll • QTY OF RANCHO CL Ary NGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Carnelian Street Realignment and Landscape Design Contracts Attached for Council execution are design contracts with Genge Consultants for the realignment of Carnelian Street and the landscape improvement of the Carnelian parkway areas from Foothill Blvd. to Hillside St. Both of these projects were included in this year's budget for construction. Genge Consultants recently completed the landscape concept plan for Carnelian Street, which was approved by the Planning Commi- ssion and the City Council. Because of funding constraints, the project will be phased. Phase I will cover the parkway areas from Foothill Blvd. to Base Line with some work at the intersection with 19th Street. Phase II will complete the project from Base Lire to Hillside. The Phase I design cost shall not exceed $19,125.00 and Phase II $23,625.00. Genge was chosen to complete plans for the realignment of Carnelian through the "S" curve area south of Base Line in order to insure full coordination between the street and landscape design efforts. The realignment design contract is not to exceed a budget of $18,700.00. It would be expected that both construction projects will be coordinated for concurrent con- struction. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve execution of design contracts with Genge Consultants for the realignment and land- scape improvement of Carnelian Street from Foothill Blvd. to Hillside Street. Respectfully sybmitted, `� ,vas LBH:f a Attachment 5Y Genge Consultants 17500 Red Hill Avenue Telephone r of Southern California Suite 204 714/7546222 Irvine, California Engineers, Planners 92714 & Surveyors I1 lJ July 10, 1980 City of Cucamonga Community Development Department 9340 Base Line Street, Suite A Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Regarding: Proposal for Landscape Architectural Services - Landscape Construction Documents for Carnelian Street Dear Mr. Hubbs: Genge Consultants is pleased to submit this contract in response to your request. This contract addresses Phase 11, construction documentation and contract administration, Phase I (Analysis and Conceptual Landscape Design) being recently completed. • Genge Consultants enjoyed working with the City staff in providing the Phase i product, and look forward to continuing service to the City. The following contract summarizes our Scope of Work and Fees for Phase 11, Construction Documentation. As in the previous work effort, Genge Consultants fully intends to meet the City's time frame for completion of all tasks. Respectfully submitted, GENGE CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Myron E. owning Vice President JSL:, %IEB /aes l J 55' 940-- J. Stephen Long Planning Director AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES • This agreement is made and entered into this _ day of July, 1980, between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY ", and GENGE CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, duly licensed Landscape Architects of 17500 Red Hill Avenue, Irvine, California, 92714, hereinafter referred to as "ARCHITECT'. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City has need for landscape architectural services to prepare landscape construction documents and provide contract administration for the land- scape development of the parkways along Carnelian Street, southerly of Hillside Drive to northerly of Foothill Boulevard (approximately three miles in length) and to provide supplementary services (coordination, soils analysis, blueprinting) for same, herein referred to as "PROJECT'. WHEREAS, the CITY has invited the ARCHITECT to provide required land sraping services for the CITY; WHEREAS, the ARCHITECT has specialized knowledge, training and experience in landscape design and construction; AND, WHEREAS, the ARCHITECT indicates willingness to perform landscaping services for the CITY under contract. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and the ARCHITECT, for the considerations hereinafter named, agree as follows; ,5 • ARTICLE 1: The ARCHITECT agrees to furnish and perform the various professional services, pertinent to landscape construction documentation as follows: A. Private Property Owner Coordination - I. Meetings /Coordination with private property owners (and mainten- ance staff) in two project intersection areas necessary to implement concept plans. B. Soils Analysis - Prior to the commencement of construction drawings a thorough soils analysis will be completed to establish soil characteristics and nutrient level. C. Preparation of landscape construction documents - The approved Concept "B" shall serve as the basis for the following contract documents. Project limits for Phase f shall be: Foothill Boulevard north to Baseline Road, the intersections of Carnelian /Baseline and Carnelian /16th Street. Phase Il • shall include all additional parkway areas not covered under Phase I, between Foothill Boulevard and Hillside Road. 1. Demolition Plan @ 1:40, graphically depicting and dimensioning paved areas, plant material, etc. which shall be demolished prior to construction beginning. 2. Staking /Hardscape Plan @ 1:40 fully dimensioning paved and planted areas, landscape mounding, walkway widths, etc. Construction details and specifications will be furnished. 3. Landscape Irrigation Plans for fully automatic sprinkler system for all landscaped areas, to include location and types of all equipment, details, legends, and specifications. 4. Landscape Planting Plans for all planted areas to include location, types, and sizes of all trees, shrubs, and ground cover with pertinent • details and specifications. S7 5. Final Cost Estimate based on current construction costs for all proposed • landscape construction items. 6. Colored planting and hardscape construction plans for presentation to Planning Commission. D. Contract Administration /Field Observation - Upon initiation of the bidding process by the City, Genge Consultants will perform the following tasks: a. Assist in answering contractor's questions regarding clarification/ interpretation of plans during bidding. b. Assistance in evaluation of bids. C. Assistance in construction observation at key stages of construction to insure plan conformance. (Not to exceed (5) job visits per phase of construction). E. Duplication and Blueprinting - A high volume of construction documents is anticipated for this project. Approximately twenty -five (25) copies of land scape construction drawings for each phase and an equal number of bid documents is estimated. All correspondence and project meeting notes shall be duplicated and distributed to all designated officials. (Note: Original tracings shall become property of the CITY upon completion of this agreement.) F. Mileage - Travel to and from the job site will be necessary throughout both design and construction. Genge has included mileage allowance in the Budget Summary at .25 per mile. ARTICLE II - The CITY agrees to pay the ARCHITECT, as compensation for the above -named professional services; • m A. For all items listed in Sections A thru F of Article 1, the CITY will compensate • the ARCHITECT at the hourly rates attached as Exhibit "A ". The total of these hourly charges shall not exceed the amounts listed on the Phase Cost Break- out. PHASE COST BREAKOUT (Not to Exceed) PHASE A. Private Property Owner Coordination - $3,000.00 B. Soils Analysis 625.00 C. Landscape Construction Documents - 10,000.00 D. Contract Administration /Field Observation 3,250.00 E. Duplication and Blueprinting 2,000.00 G. Mileage 250.00 TOTAL PHASE 1: $19,125.00 PHASE II (Shall not begin without prior authorization from City.) • A. Landscape Construction Documents $17,125.00 B. Contract Administration /Field Observation 3,250.00 C. Duplication and Blueprinting 3,000.00 D. Mileage 250.00 TOTAL PHASE 11: $23,625.00 B. The ARCHITECT will submit monthly billings including a summary of the hours worked by each classification, the hourly rate, and the total charges for each classification. ARTICLE III - If the work is suspended indefinitely or abandoned prior to completion of the Landscaping Services set forth in this Agreement, the CITY agrees to pay the ARCHITECT, at the rates set forth in Article 11 above, to the time of said suspension or abandonment, which payment is to be the full and final settlement for all the work performed by the ARCHITECT to said time, and such work shall become the property • of the CITY upon said payment. 57 ARTICLE 1V - All terms, conditions and provisions hereof shall inure to and shall bind • the parties herein, their successors and assigns. ARTICLE V - The ARCHITECT hereby designates J. Stephen Long, Project Manager/ Director of Planning and Alan Fishman, Landscape Architect as its representatives for this PROJECT. ARTICLE VI - The ARCHITECT shall begin work immediately following the approval and signing of this Agreement. The ARCHITECT shall perform the work in a timely and efficient manner according to the following schedule: PHASE I - 90 days from date of authorization to first plan check. PHASE 11 - 90 days from date of authorization to first plan check. ARTICLE VII SCOPE OF WORK MODIFICATION In the event the Scope of Work should change to a degree that will alter the fee, the ARCHITECT will contact the CITY in writing, and a revised fee, if necessary, will be established through negotiation. Requests for extra work will be documented, and a completion time and compensation amount will be submitted for City approval. ARTICLE Vill SCOPE OF WORK EXCLUSIONS include the following: 1. Additional unforseen coordination efforts encountered during performance of Scope of Work. These efforts will be identified to CITY. 2. Fees, permits, etc. 3. Design of specific street furniture items. 4. Major modifications, changes by staff to council approved Conceptual Street- scape design. Go C, J • IN WITNESS WHEREOFt the parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. • APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Rancho Cucamonga MSA:nss L] &I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-, By: By: City Clerk GENGE CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA By Myron E. Browning Vice- President /Principa 400 AGREEMENT FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES This agreement is made and entered into this day of July, 1980, between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY ", and GENGE CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, duly licensed civil engineers of 17500 Red Hill Avenue, Irvine, California, 92714, herein- after referred to as "ENGINEER ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY has need for civil engineering services to prepare prelimin- ary and final construction documents for karVian Street between Baseline and Foothill Boulevard (approximately 1500 lineal eet in length) and to provide supple- mentary services (coordination, blueprinting) for same, herein referred to as "PRO- JECT". • WHEREAS, the CITY has invited the ENGINEER to provide required civil engineering services for the CITY; WHEREAS, the ENGINEER has specialized knowledge, training and experience in civil engineering and surveying. AND, WHEREAS, the ENGINEER indicates willingness to perform civil engineer- ing services for the CITY under contract. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and the ENGINEER, for the considerations hereinafter named, agree as follows: • 6,a ARTICLE I: The ENGINEER agrees to furnish and perform the various professional services, pertinent to civil engineering construction documentatin as follows: • A. Perform a field topo grading survey from approximately stations 10 + 00 to 25 + 00. 1. This means to provide a cross - section at 25 foot intervals. Cross - sections to include existing top of curb, elevations, existing flowline elevations, and existing centerline and /or crown line elevations within existing right -of- way and sufficient additional topo outside of right -of -way necessary. B. Provide one preliminary design for Carnelian Street from approximately Stations 10+00 to 25 +00. 1. This preliminary design shall be prepared at a 1" = 40' scale in "red- line" format only. 2. Based upon preliminary design, prepare a preliminary cost estimate. . 3. Based upon preliminary design, prepare a preliminary set of calculations for right -of -way acquisition. C. Coordinate with San Bernardino County Flood Control for design parameters and constraints related to construction of Cucamonga Channel as it effects road design. D. Based upon preliminary design and coordination with San Bernardino County Flood Control, prepare a design evaluation report for city review. ARTICLE II: The ENGINEER agrees to furnish and perform the various additional professional services, pertaining to civil engineering construction documentation as follows: A. Final drafted set of construction documents for Carnelian Street from approxi- mately Stations 10 - 00 to 25 + 00. (03 • 1. This means to provide all street improvement plans and profiles at a scale • of 1" - 40' in conformance with City format. This will include details and a title sheet. B. Provide a final cost estimate based upon the final construction drawings. C. The final drafted set of construction documents shall include any realignment of existing sewer and /or water lines. All other utility decoration and /or design is this Scope of Work. This specifically excludes any Hydrology and /or hydraulic design and /or elevations. D. The final construction documents shall include all material specifications suit- able for bidding (follow City format). ARTICLE III: The ENGINEER agrees to furnish and perform the various additional professional services, pertinent to construction surveying as follows: A. Provide one set of curb and gutter stakes at 25' intervals and at EC's and BC's for the final Carnelian Street design from approximately Stations 10 + 00 to 25 + • 00. Any re- staking will be performed as a time and material extra. B. Any utility staking for sewer, water, storm drain, gas, electric, telephone and /or cable television is outside this Scope of Work. Any such work shall be performed on a time and materials basis as an extra. ARTICLE IV: The ENGINEER agrees to furnish the following reproductions and originals: A. One set of inked originals. B. Up to 25 sets of bluelines of the final plans and material specifications. C. All travel time, mileage, and deliveries for transmittal of information to and from the CITY. • (o y ARTICLE V: The CITY agrees to pay the ENGINEER, as compensation for the above - named professional services: • A. For all items listed in Sections A thru D of Article I, the CITY will compensate the ENGINEER at the hourly rates attached as Exhibit "A ". The total of these hourly charges shall not exceed $8,500.00. B. For all items listed in Sections A thru D of Article II, the CITY will compensate the ENGINEER at the hourly rates attached as Exhibit "A ". The total of those hourly charges shall not exceed $5,850.00. C. For all items listed in Sections A and B inclusive of Article III, the CITY will compensate the ENGINEER at the hourly rates attached as Exhibit "A ". The total of these hourly charges shall not exceed $3,500.00. D. For all items listed in Sections A thru C inclusive of Article IV, the CITY will compensate the ENGINEER at costs plus 10 percent for reproductions. Mileage will be billed at $0.25 per mile. The total of these charges shall not exceed $850.00. E. COST BREAKOUT (Not to Exceed) ARTICLE 1. Topographic Survey and Preliminary $ 8,500.00 "Redline" Design and Report ARTICLE 11. Final Inked Construction Plans, Specifications dt Cost Estimate 5,850.00 ARTICLE Ill. Construction Staking For Curb /Gutter 3,500.00 ARTICLE IV. Reproductions and Deliveries 850.00 TOTAL (Not to Exceed $18,700.00 F. The ENGINEER will submit monthly billings including a summary of the hours worked by each classification, the hourly rate, and the total charges for each classification. &s • • 0 ARTICLE VI: - If the work is suspended indefinitely or abandoned prior to completion of the civil engineering set forth in this Agreement, the CITY agrees to pay the ENGINEER, at the rates set forth in Article V above, to the time of said suspension or abandonment, which payment is to be the full and final settlement for all the work performed by the ENGINEER to said time, and such work shall become the property of the CITY upon said payment. ARTICLE VII: - All terms, conditions and provisions hereof shall inure to and shall bind the parties herein, their successors and assigns. ARTICLE Vill: - The ENGINEER hereby designates Myron E. Browning, Vice- Presi- • dent /Principal and Earl Gardner, Project Manager /Project Engineer as its representa- tives for this PROJECT. ARTICLE IX: - The ENGINEER shall begin work immediately following the approval and signing of this Agreement. The ENGINEER shall perform the work in a timely and efficient manner in accordance with the attached time schedule. • f IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Rancho Cucamonga M SA:nss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: By: City Clerk GENGE CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA By: / /Lc,, 4_, rP tl Myron E. rowning Vice - resident /Princi I 6 7 400 CI • WORK SCHEDULE .- Job No ClientCitY of Rancho ProjectManager Browning Description of Project Cucamonga Date Prepared July 10 198o Carnelian Street Revised Original Schedule Currently Revised Schedule �� >s.: completed on schedule Completed After Scheduled Date Mi■■:■:■:■■■■■■■■ Notice o Proceed . 32 34 36 38 40 22 24 26 28 ■■:■: ■ ■ MEN : ■ ■ ■: ■ ■■u ■u■■uuo■■■■. . . ■ ■. ■.■ ■ .. u■ ...■ ■ on ME - .• .� rwwwwwwwwwwwwwww�o ■ ■■ �■. ■. ■ NOINVOINIONNERINNON ling ..�� .�■.CC� .�............0 1■ �i ' iiiiii I ii ■ son uC■:C ■■ ■■■■■■■■C■■--Cee■■■i■nui■■ i • MM - ��iiin iiiii iii i"G■■�iiiiiiiiiin ii Ti ■■iQiiiii�iiini�iiiiiu■iiiiiiii ONE �' �i ■iriiiniiii�i.G7iiaia� iii i�■ md so 1!1111 ------- Jim a CITY OF RANCHO CUrA,NMUA SO C�'.CA.t,)IN: STAFF REPORT • C [� O F U 2 DATE: July 16, 1980 �% > 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: San Bernardino County Flood Control Benefit Assessment Program Staff recently transmitted to the Council a report from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District on its proposed Benefit Assessment Program. This grogram as currently con- structed, will place an assessment on property owners in Rancho Cucamonga of $14 per year for the Basic Assessment Unit which is a standard 7200 sq. ft. single family house. This assessment under law can be established by the Board of Supervisors after proper public hearing. The program there- after must be ratified by 508 of the voters in an election. It is the County's plans that 1980 -81 assessment of $14 will • be established at a hearing July 14, 1980 with a more fully developed program to be submitted to the voters at the November election. The District is attempting to structure a program which will contain a $19 assessment for regional facility maintenance and construction and some additional amount to be established by Cities for storm drain construction. The program seems to have great promise in giving everyone an opportunity to solve drainage problems, however, it is develop- ing too quickly to allow a thorough review by the Cities. City Engineers in the West Valley area recently met and expressed this concern to Flood Control District staff and requested delay in Board action on assessments until the program can be further reviewed by the Cities and the Flood Control Zone Advisory Committee. Attached is a letter from Mayor Ellingwood of Ontario which expresses the concern expressed by most of the City Engineers. Councilman Bridge and myself will be attending the July 14 hearing and additional meetings scheduled for next week. More information will be available for the July 16 Council meeting. Respectfully,submitted, �94 �.y CI1T Mnll ONTARIO. 1110, CALIFORNIA 01)61 •EFn CO DE'_> -11' - .. .. .ry,(.a 0!6.1131 CO..L, ::f;'lLd'v t_DfiGIIsI Dt San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors 175 West Fifth Street San Bernardino, California Gentlemen: RE; FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSIdENT DISTRICT At its meeting of July 1, 1980, the Ontario City Council took the following action relative to the above subject: • 1. To urge the Flood Control Engineer to arrange a joint meeting with all of tine City Engineers in Flood Control District Zone 1 at the earliest possible date; 2. Request that the proposed Benefit Assessment District include a provision to crulit those who have already contributed to the construction of flood control facilities; 3. Urge the Flood Control District to work closely with the cities and through the ;:one 1 Advisory Committee, Chambers of Commerce and other civic groups to develop a Bt nefit Assessment District for total flood protection; A. Urge the Flood Control District to construct water retention facilities as part of all regional projects in order to maximize ground water basin recharge; and 5. Urge the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors not to levy an assessment until after it has been presented to the voters. In ad:lition, the Ontario City Council has reviewed Ontario's proposed storm drain pro- ject priority list. While the exact project designations and priority ranking have not been established, this list will be used by the City Engineer in preliminary discussions with the Flood Control Engineer, for the pi-pose of ^stablishing an assessment amount_ necessary to fund our "local" storm drain needs, estimated at $2S million. Ontario supports thv concept of a Flood Control Benefit Assessment District and recognizes the naed for tho construction of flood protection facilities. llowover, a major concern e.rpra:;sed by tho Ontario City Council was the. timing of the ballot for district formation. Wo :strongly urge the careful planning and preparation of this program and that the issue not be presented to the voters until sufficient effort and energy have been expended to •produce a program in which the. rotors can have confidence. -76 ^0 .i a L G, 0. I' t, t F1 %1(� AM R. E. BOB ELLING'+ 1000 fl L181`�I 9, 1111 -111" 1 °I`S W I&FR D. HUGHBANKS BbOO, ch:•1nn.e, ROBIRT K. ABEL July 7, 1930 DoORIS E. ARTUSURN HOMER F. BRIGGS Ciw Cle,k FAYE MYFRS DASTRUP KENNETH M. KEENLY BfEOIER M OLIN Cn, Lenu,er Council Members San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors 175 West Fifth Street San Bernardino, California Gentlemen: RE; FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSIdENT DISTRICT At its meeting of July 1, 1980, the Ontario City Council took the following action relative to the above subject: • 1. To urge the Flood Control Engineer to arrange a joint meeting with all of tine City Engineers in Flood Control District Zone 1 at the earliest possible date; 2. Request that the proposed Benefit Assessment District include a provision to crulit those who have already contributed to the construction of flood control facilities; 3. Urge the Flood Control District to work closely with the cities and through the ;:one 1 Advisory Committee, Chambers of Commerce and other civic groups to develop a Bt nefit Assessment District for total flood protection; A. Urge the Flood Control District to construct water retention facilities as part of all regional projects in order to maximize ground water basin recharge; and 5. Urge the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors not to levy an assessment until after it has been presented to the voters. In ad:lition, the Ontario City Council has reviewed Ontario's proposed storm drain pro- ject priority list. While the exact project designations and priority ranking have not been established, this list will be used by the City Engineer in preliminary discussions with the Flood Control Engineer, for the pi-pose of ^stablishing an assessment amount_ necessary to fund our "local" storm drain needs, estimated at $2S million. Ontario supports thv concept of a Flood Control Benefit Assessment District and recognizes the naed for tho construction of flood protection facilities. llowover, a major concern e.rpra:;sed by tho Ontario City Council was the. timing of the ballot for district formation. Wo :strongly urge the careful planning and preparation of this program and that the issue not be presented to the voters until sufficient effort and energy have been expended to •produce a program in which the. rotors can have confidence. -76 County Board of Supervisors July 7, 1930 Page 2 • A zone -wide proposal as opposed to a county -wide election would have the advantage of having the voters understand what facilities would he constructed and present a much smaller total dollar figure, thus not scaring the voters into a "no" vote. Sincerely, R. E. f:]uno rood % Mayor CC! Mr. DiPietro, San Bernardino County Flood Control Engineer Zone 1 Mayors Zone 1 Advisory Committee Zone 1 City Engineers • • -71 • • • CITY OF RANU -10 CUCANKXX A STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner �XAA4,) c� < .0 0 O F 8 i U i 1977 SUBJECT: Agreement for Extension of Services on General Plan with Sedway /Cooke ABSTRACT: Attached please find a copy of the agreement for extension of services with Sedway /Cooke. This extension has been necessitated by the problems incurred by Sedway /Cooke in meeting contract deadlines. The payment schedule has now been revised to provide for payments upon re- ceipt of certain tasks as described in the contract. We feel that with the clarifications included in the agreement and the revised payment schedule, that we will receive an adequate job from Sedway /Cooke in the timeframe delineated on the last page of the contract. The General Plan and DEIR will be ready to begin the public hearing process on October 1, 1980. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council direct the Mayor to execute the attached agreement and direct staff to forward copies to Sedway /Cooke for their execution. Res ectfully submitted, _ ��lf) �I`'' _t JACK A " recter�df` .... .... Community Development JL:BH:jk 7A lJ AMENDMENT TO GENERAL PLAN PROJECT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as CITY and Sedway /Cooke, a California Corpora- tion, hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT, for professional services dated and effective October 1, 1979, is hereby amended in the following particulars only: The parties hereby agree: WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Consultant have entered into a contract to prepare a General Plan; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that amendment be made to such Gen- eral Plan Contract. NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED that the following changes are made to cover all remaining responsibilities of Consultant as follows. That Article II, Sections B,3, be added to the contract to read as follows 3. The Consultant shall prepare a screencheck draft Urban Design Element • for submission to the City by July 25, 1980. This screencheck draft will be prepared in accordance with Tasks 3a5 through 3a10 of the revised Work Program, but will not address circulation and traffic. Within four weeks of receipt of materials submitted by the City pursuant to Section C.4, a revised screencheck draft reflecting these subjects shall be submitted to the City as part of the screencheck draft General Plan. 4. Within two weeks of receipt of materials submitted by the City pursu- ant to Section C.4, the Consultant shall submit a screenscheck draft Energy Element prepared in accordance with Tasks 3613 through 3b16 of the revised Work Program. (Note: This element requires land use as well as circula- tion inputs). 5. The Consultant shall prepare a report establishing an internal consis- tency administrative procedure in accordance with Task 5b for submission by July 25, 1980. 6. The Consultant shall prepare an Administrative Procedure for General Plan /Implementation System Consistency for submission by July 25, 1980. 7. Within four weeks of receipt of materials submitted by the City pur- suant to Section C.4, the Consultant shall submit a screencheck draft Gen- eral Plan and EIR to the City. The screencheck draft General Plan will consider City's conments on the screencheck draft Energy Element which are received within one week of submission. -7 3 a 8. The Consultant shall revise the screencheck drafts of the Urban Design and Energy Elements, and the General Plan and EIR to correct errors of fact, omissions of data and insufficient data. The Consultant will consider other comments provided by the City and may revise screencheck drafts to reflect these comments. As the author of the Land Use and Circulation Element, the City shall be responsible for the analyses and recommendations contained therein. The Consultant as author of the remaining General Plan Elements and DEIR shall be responsible for the analyses and recommendations contained therein. The Consultant shall submit the revised draft General Plan and DEIR to the City within ten days of receipt of the City's comments on the screen - check drafts. This submission shall include a technical report, prepared in accordance with Task 6D, on the compliance of the draft General Plan with applicable state laws. That Article II, Section C of the contract be amended in its entirety to read: C. Responsibility of City 1. The City shall be responsible for all liaison, coordination, and com- munication with all city agencies, staff, officials, and current or pre- vious consultants to the City, as well as with other involved agencies of other levels and jurisdictions, including but not limited to San Bernardino County, the Southern California Association of Governments and the State of California. CJ 2. The City shall assume full responsibility for the preparation of the text and Land Use Plan Map and Circulation Plan Map for the Land Use and Cir- • culation Elements. The City shall have the responsibility as it deems appropriate to ensure that the format of the text; graphics, and plans is consistent with the organization and format already established by the Consultant. 3. The City shall ensure the compatibility of the Land Use Plan with the Circulation Plan by testing the land use plan using the DKS citywide traffic model. The costs of DKS's services for i<hi -purpose will be paid by the Consultant up to the maximum of $4,L , tke-cmouni re- ai -total $10,900 General Plan /Industrial Area Ptah Audgat -fo- ^"`- ^ ^ ^• ^- ^° The City will have the necessary Land Use inputs to DKS no later than July 28, 1980. 4. Subsequent to the testing of the Land Use Plan as described above, the City shall submit the revised Land Use and Circulation Plans, including text and graphics, and the results of DKS analysis to the Consultant. The materials submitted shall contain information at a level of detail, e.g., number of housing units by type of unit, acres of commercial and indus- trial uses by land use categories, number of students and schools, acres of parks, general location for all uses, and vehicle miles travelled in order for the Consultant to meet its responsibilities as specified in Article 11, Section B. .2_ -7y • 5. The City shall review Screencheck drafts of materials submitted by the Consultant for factual accuracy, omissions of data and insufficient data. • The City may provide the Consultant with additional comments on these materials. That Article II, Section G of the contract be amended in its entirety to read as follows: Payment shall be made according to the following shcedule: 1. $9,700 per month for seven months, receipt of which is hereby acknow- ledged by the Consultant. 2. $14,550 payable, within 15 days of the execution by City of this amend- ment to the general plan project contract. 3. $4,850 payable within 15 days of receipt by the City of the existing land use map, "1000" scale draft land use plan (presented to the CAC in May, 1980), and its tracing paper overlay. 4. $4,850 payable within 15 days of the receipt by the City of the Screen- check Urban Design Element, internal consistency procedure, and General Plan /Implementation Consistency Procedure. 5. $4,850 payable within 15 days of the receipt by the City of the work • product specified in Artucle II, Section 0.4 - Screencheck Energy Element. • 6. $7,500 payable within 15 days of the receipt by the City of the work products specified in Article Il, Section B.7 - Screencheck Draft General Plan and EIR. 7. $7,500 payable within 15 days of the receipt by the City of the work products specified in Article 11, Section 0.8 - Revised Draft General Plan and EIR and Technical Report on Compliance with State Laws. That Article II, Section K of the contract be amended in its entirety as follows: K. Compensation. The City agrees to pay the Consultant for all services and materials rendered in the performance of the specified work scope as amended herein, a sum of not to exceed $112,000. However, for those services requested by the City that go beyond the scope of said agreement, Consultant shall be entitled to time and materials compen- sation billable at the Consultant's then standard billing rates. That the list of products or tasks in Task 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Re- fined Work Program (Appendix A) is amended in its entirety to read as follows: -3- `7 s 1. One camera -ready copy of the Draft General Plan and Draft General Plan FIR on the Sedway /Cooke letterhead, including a technical appendix, pro- fuse illustrations and final graphic and mapping materials necessary as components to the General Plan and EIR to make the documents complete. To enhance the quality of the reproduction of graphics and maps by the • City's printer, they shall be submitted in camera - ready, unreduced form. Maps, including a Land -Use Plan map shall be submitted on mylars at "2000" scale with instructions for reducing to 11 x 17 format. 2. One camera -ready copy (black and white) of the "popular summary ". 3. One "1000" scale reproducible mylar or sepia, for City use, of the base map for Rancho cucamonga General Plan. 4. All maps and texts to be reproducible through Xerox or Diazo machine. 5. All maps in final approved form shall be on reproducible mylar or sepia for City use, with each print appropriately rendered in color, and specificiations for preparation of the maps roted. 6. A presentation of draft Plan Elements and draft EIR Materials pre- pared by Consultants with appropriate graphic material necessary, to a joint Planning Commission and City Council meeting held October 1, 1980, at the Forum Room of the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. That the Work Schedule for Certification and Genral Plan adoption is amended and the new schedule is as shown on attachment A to this modified agreement. In all other procedural respects, except as modified herein, the General • Plan Agreement dated October 1, 1979, remains in full force and effect. Date: Approved as to Form and Content City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Paul Sedway or Thomas Cooke Principals, Sedway /Cooke • Attachment A • AMENDED SCHEDULE FOR DRAFT GENERAL PLAN AND DEIR COMPLETION TIME TASK Present through July 25 City prepares text and graphics for the Land Use and Circulation Elements, includ- ing Land Use and Circulation Plans. Con- sultant prepares screencheck draft of Urban Design Element, Internal Consistency Adminis- trative Procedure, and General Plan /Implemen- tation System Consistency Procedure. July 28 OKS begins testing Land Use and Circulation Plans completed by City. August 1 City submits revised Land Use and Circula- tion Plans, including text and graphics, and results of DKS analysis to Consultant. August 14 Consultant submit Draft Energy Element. August 29 Consultant completes screencheck draft of • General Plan and Draft EIR. September 1 - 8 City reviews screencheck draft General Plan and Draft EIR. September 8 - 17 Consultant revises screencheck draft Gen- eral Plan and Draft EIR. October 1 Consultant presents revised draft General Plan and Draft EIR to joint Planning Com- mission and City Council meeting and Con- sultant responsibilities conclude. 9 -77 QTY OF RANUM CUCAMONUA SFAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map No. 5684 The subject map is a subdivision of 19 acres into 6 lots located at the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald by Henry Reiter. The street improvements were installed under site approvals and therefore, bonds are not required prior to final approval of the map. It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map No. 5684 and allowing the City Engineer to forward the map for recording. Respectfully s bmitted, �1 LBHJLM:jaa Attachment I RESOLUTION NO. 80 -51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5684. (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5684) WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 5684, submitted by Linville- Sanderson -Horn and consisting of 6 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Archibald and Arrow, being a division of a portion of the north 3;, of the northeast :, of the southeast �i, of Section 10, Township 1 south, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5684 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 5684 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk q. Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ,rrl„1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 5684 ♦r,... i�'w r �enc 6vunro ' ya my A I !I 1 L f1 n 1 ♦r,... i�'w r �enc 6vunro ' ya my A I TENTATIVE 'PARCEL .-MAP NO. 5684 AAD USE: INDUSTAJAL 10MI115: 01-ii•7 7 IF I 11 1 VV.1. - OCA1Nn p STAFF REPORT <� o F DATE: July 16, 1980 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 5893 Acceptance of Map Parcel Map No. 5893 is a division of land on the northside of Victoria Avenue, 440 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue. The map was submitted by Robert F. Barton. Street improvement will be constructed or bonded before building permits are issued. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution to authorize the City Engineer to forward the map for recordation. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK: j as Attachments RESOLUTION N0. 80 -70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5893. (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5893.) WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 5893, submitted by Robert F. Barton and consisting two parcels, located on the north side of Victoria Avenue, 440' east of Etiwanda Avenue being a division of a portion of Lot 13, Block H, Etiwanda Colony Lands as recorded in Book 2, Page 24 of Maps, records of San Bernardino County, State of California was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, - WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5893 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 5893 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor MRCEL I ICf.4P `A'Q 5893 sHIEET 10 AN THE LIrY A" RANCHO CLCAMCW7;'A �'I /' BEING A SUBD: /SION OF 4 PCRTYJN OF LOT 13 BLCLK N SCALE: £rM'ANM CM VY LANDS AS RECOROEO IN BWK 2 PA 6t OF F MAPS ECOROS Ok SANBERNARDINO CUJWT S SrA/E FO IRON ROD fD 2 "LP HIGHLANO .4VEM/£�_, _ [OS CEDROS .� sour AVENa- N T 13, OF SOUTH /SO 2 OF L07 /3 B(LCK N MB 2/14 WN O 1359 N Asr 19993' p I" ❑ PARCEL PARCEL 2 8 W J M -^ S.f iqj l3 409 S F 25, 85L. 2 4 96 C 4 3 48' 7' 4 h EAST 191.95 WI T 18 81 M PD. R.A. SPM£ 44000 m l ?21F 9' _ 702.% F 202/. 0 n EAST 2724.46 FO SPIKE FD. NAB. VICTORIA AbENUE GENERAL INFORMAT ION THE SITE IS FRES£NTLY VACANT; BOUNCED BY VACANT PROPERTY TO THE NCWTH AAV SINGLE ,wfxy RESIDENCES ON mf EAST AND WEST. THERE A9E SIX PALM TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VICTORIA AVE. THAT WILL NAVE TO BE REMOVED IF CURBS B GUrTERS ARE INSTALLED PRESENT ZONING /S SINGLE FAMILY. //NIX. SURROUNDING) PROPOSED LAND USE /S FOR SINGLE FAMILY RE5/DCNC23 . VlClN1TY MAP NO SCALE UT2/TY NOTES W4rER. GAS AND ELECTRICAL SEa ARE AVAILABLE IN VICTORIA AMM SEWAGE O/SPOSAL TO BE BY S£P! TANK AN'O CESSPOOL. SURVEYOR PHIL K MVSLEY V33 E R05EHCCn CT ONTARIO, G4. 91764 0741 5194 -470? CITY OF RANCHO Cl1CAMpN(:A STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 5892 Acceptance of Map Parcel Map No. 5892 is for the division of a one acre lot into two lots at the southwest corner of Hellman and Hillside. The map was submitted by Cynthia Prescher, owner /subdivider. The street improvements were installed by the owner and recently accepted by Public Works Inspection Staff. It is recommended that Council approve the attached resolution and authorize the City Engineer to forward the map for recording. Respectfully submitted, LBH:JLM:jaa Attachment /b RESOLUTION NO. 80 -71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5892. (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5892) WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 5892, submitted by Cynthia Prescher and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Hillside and Hellman, being a division of Lot 1 of Block 10 of Cucamonga Homestead Association was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5892 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 5892 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk /I. Itl r' I. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 5892 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BEING A DIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE EAST ONE -HALF OF LOT I, BLOCK 10, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION AS RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA VICINITY MAP c PALACE[ P n IIn I E %IST ZONE R LAND USE RI -$0 SVRROUNGING $ONE al -$O GENERAL PLAN DESIONATON I e $ UNITS PER KRE VERY LAC, DENSITY Q. �L I UTU9[f ELI n c scI — PWxf -ITEL I � I IIDxx(nf I i self D' I PALACE[ I 11.1 NI VICINITY MAP c PALACE[ P n IIn I E %IST ZONE R LAND USE RI -$0 SVRROUNGING $ONE al -$O GENERAL PLAN DESIONATON I e $ UNITS PER KRE VERY LAC, DENSITY Q. �L I UTU9[f ELI n c scI — PWxf -ITEL i self D' PALACE[ I VICINITY MAP c PALACE[ P n IIn I E %IST ZONE R LAND USE RI -$0 SVRROUNGING $ONE al -$O GENERAL PLAN DESIONATON I e $ UNITS PER KRE VERY LAC, DENSITY Q. �L I UTU9[f ELI n c scI — PWxf -ITEL CITY OF RAWM CUCAWNGA S'FAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Bond Extension The City Engineer is May of 1979 approved a waiver of Parcel Map for James Van Antewerp consisting of 2 lots on the east - side of Hellman north of Banyan. The conditions of approval included construction of street improvements in front of one of the lots. Mr. Van Antewerp has contacted the Engineering Staff indicating that he desires constructing the improvements in front of both lots with the sale of the smaller parcel (No. 1). The time allowed in the agreement to construct was about to run out and the City notified the owner to request an exten- sion. Mr. Van Antewerp has requested a 12 month time exten- sion with the commitment of doing the improvements in front of both lots. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve a 6 month extension and direct the City Clerk to notify Mr. Van Antewerp of the Council's action. Further, that the improvements must be in within 6 months. Resnectfully submitted, LBH:JLM:jaa Attachment 13. "I — TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO IN TRf ally 11 R4119. 4 of P'RCEZ I of PWICZ MAP 173� A$ f&CD IN PAqC61 MAP 600K /Y P IC Y4 /r 7#C c"I", lec-901" " 5"171 IP IAIFbRIIA APRIL IA PARC E L I PARCEL, 2 -p I z7 - 'Iss NeIeS DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Consent Calendar - Release of Bonds C1,1CA.NO G� hC! � � s r O (� O F V Z U > 1977 I Tract 9427 - Located on the North and South sides of Banyan Street between Hermosa and Haven OWNER: Lesny Development Co. P. O. Box 5526 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Labor and Material Bond (Road) $53,000 Labor and Material Bond (Water) $19,500 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer) $20,500 Tract 8884 Located on the East and South sides of Red Hill Country Club Drive OWNER: Harnish, Morgan and Company 500 East "E" Street Ontario, California 91764 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer On -site) $ 6,500 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer Off0site) 21,000 Labor and Material Bond (Water) $21,000 Tract 9382 - Located on the Southeast corner of Base Line and Haven OWNER: Lesny /Wilshire Properties P. 0. Box 5526 Beverly Hills, California 90210 Labor and Material Bond (Road) $79,000 Tract 9617 - Located on the West side of Hellman North of Arrow Route OWNER: M. J. Brock 6 Sons, Inc. 1698 Greenbriar Lane Suite 224 Brea, California 92621 Labor and Material Bond (Landscapine) $ 7,530 %4) July 11, 1980 TO: Mayor and City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: Douglas W. Ayres SUBJECT: City Manager Employment Agreement Attached hereto is the proposed employment agreement with Mr. Wasserman. At your Executive Session of June 18, you approved of this concept and instructed me to develop such an agreement. This approach to retention of your City Manager also was discussed and recommended in my report to you dated June 18, which was accepted by Council at that public meeting. The attached agreement is lifted almost verbatim from the model agreement prepared and published by the International City Management Association in its publication "Employment Guidelines for Urban Administration ". The only significant changes are: 1. Those which you approved in executive session and instructed me to include herein, and 2. The deferred compensation agreement language, also lifted essentially verbatim from the Council approved City deferred compensation plan with Glendale Federal Savings. I will be available to answer your question the afternoon and evening of your meeting at which this document will be considered -- July 16. I also will telephone you between the time you receive this and the meeting. Should you have any questions, I will be pleased to respond. DWA /vz NO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 16th day of July, 1980, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "employer" or "City ", of the one part, and LAUREN M. WASSEPUMAN, hereinafter called "employee," of the other part, both of whom understand as follows: WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City desires to retain in employment the services of said Lauren M. Wasserman as City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to provide certain benefits, establish certain conditions of employment, and to set working conditions of said employee; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council (1) to assure that the health of employee is adequate and is regularly verified by competent authority as adequate to continue in said position, (2) to provide a just means for terminating the services of employee at such time as he may be unable to discharge fully his duties due to disability or age or when the City Council may desire to otherwise terminate his employ, (3) to assist in the maintenance of the health and well -being of employee, (4) to retain the services of employee and to provide inducement for him to remain in such employment, (5) to make possible full work productivity by assuring employee's morale, health, and peace of mind with respect to the future security of him and his family, (6) to act as a deterrent against malfeasance or dishonesty for personal gain on the part of employee and against morally questionable personal financial dealings, and (7) to establish a clear and mutually understood system of compensating employee so as to avoid future misunderstandings regarding either pay or fringe benefit treatment; and WHEREAS, employee currently serves in said position as City Manager and the City Council wishes to retain said employee in said position; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. DUTIES City hereby agrees to employ said Lauren M. Wasserman as City Manager of said City to perform the duties and functions specified in the City Code Employment Agreement -2- July 16, 1980 and to perform such other legally permissable and proper duties and functions as the City Council shall from time to time assign. SECTION 2. TERN ' A. Employee agrees to remain in the exclusive employ of City until August 1, 1983, and neither to seek, to accept, nor to become employed by any other employer until after said date, unless said termination date is effected as hereinafter provided. B. The term "employed" shall not be construed to include occasional teaching, writing, lecturing, or consulting performed on employee's time off, provided said consulting in no way conflicts with or utilizes information vital to the interests of the City. C. Nothing in this agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of the City Council to terminate the services of employee at any time, subject only to the provisions set forth in Section 3 of this agreement. D. Nothing in this agreement shall prevent, limit, or otherwise interfere with the right of employee to resign at any time from his position with the City, subject only to the provision set forth in Section 3, paragraph B, hereof. E. In the event the employment of the employee has not been terminated prior to expiration date of this agreement and the City desires to continue to employ the employee, his employment shall continue after said expiration date upon the same terms and conditions as those in effect at said expiration date and until the City Council gives notice to employee of termination. In the event employee continues in employment after said expiration date, all benefit provisions of this agreement shall be paid to and /or apply for the benefit of employee at the time of termination, whenever that event may occur. SECTION 3. TERMINATION AND SEVERANCE PAY A. In the event employee is terminated by the City Council before expiration of the aforesaid term of employment and during such time that the employee is willing and able to perform the duties of City Manager, then, in that event, the City agrees to pay employee a lump sum cash payment equal to six (6) months' aggregate salary; provided, however, that in the event employee is terminated because of his conviction of any illegal act involving personal gain to him, then, in that event, the City shall have no obligation to pay the aggregate severance sum designated in this paragraph. B. In the event employee voluntarily resigns his position with the City after the expiration of the aforesaid tern of employment, then employee shall give the City sixty (60) days notice in advance. w1i Employment Agreement -3- July 16, 1980 C. In the event the City at any time during the employment term reduces the salary or other financial benefits of employee in a greater percentage than an applicable across - the -board reduction for all City employees, or in the event the City refuses, following written notice, to comply with any other provision benefiting employee herein, or the employee resigns following a suggestion, whether formal or informal, by the City Council that he resign, then, in that event, employee may at his option, be deemed to be "terminated" at the date of such reduction or such refusal to comply within the meaning and context of the herein severance pay provision. SECTION 4. BASE ANNUAL SALARY A. City agrees to pay employee for his services rendered pursuant hereto a base annual salary set annually by resolution, payable in install- ments at the same time as other employees of the City are paid. B. City also agrees to increase said base salary and /or other ben- efits of employee in such amounts and to such an extent as the City Council may determine at its discretion, but no less frequently than an annual review of said employee made at the same time as similar consideration is given other employees generally. SECTION 5. HOURS OF WORK A. Employee's schedule of work each day and week shall vary in accord- ance with the work required to be performed, including such time as necessary outside normal office hours. In recognition thereof, employee shall not be entitled, during his employment term, to receive overtime compensation for hours worked over forty (40) hours per week; provided, however, that compen- satory time off may be taken by employee at such time as he may select on an hour for hour basis. In connection therewith, employee shall cause records of time worked and compensatory time off taken to be maintained, and shall cause the same to be filed bi- monthly with the appropriate City officer. B. Employee shall not spend more than ten (10) hours per week in teaching, consulting, or other noncity- connected business without the express prior approval of the City Council, and shall not spend more than ten (10) hours per month involved in such activities without reporting same to the City Council. C. Employee nor his wife shall own any interest in any real property within the City limits with the exception of his personal dwelling, without first securing the express approval of the City Council. SECTION 6. AUT0140BILE Employee's duties require that he shall have the exclusive and un- restricted use at all times during his employment with the City of an auto- mobile provided to him by the City. City shall be responsible for paying li Employment Agreement -4- July 16, 1980 for liability, property damage, and comprehensive insurance and for the purchase, operation, maintenance, repair and regular replacement of said automobile. SECTION 7. DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS City agrees to budget and pay the professional dues and subscriptions of employee necessary for his continuation and full participation in national, regional, state, and local associations and organizations necessary and de- sirable for his continued professional participation, growth and advancement, and for the good of the City. SECTION S. CIVIC CLUB MEMBERSHIP City recognizes the desirability of representation in and before local civic and other organizations, and employee is authorized to become a member of any appropriate civic clubs or organizations, for which City shall pay all expenses. Employee shall report to the Finance Director on each membership that he has taken out at City expense. SECTION 9. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT A. City hereby agrees to budget and pay all travel and subsistence expenses of employee for professional and official travel, meetings, and occasions adequate to continue the professional development of employee and and to adequately pursue necessary official and other functions for City, including but not limited to the annual conference of the International City Management Association, the League of California Cities and all departments thereof, the National League of Cities, and such other national, regional, state and local governmental groups and committees thereof as employee shall serve as a member or shall determine to be of ability to and benefit of city and employee. B. City also agrees to budget and pay for the travel and subsistence expenses of employee for shortcourses, institutes, and seminars that are necessary for his professional development and for the good of the City. SECTION 10. GENERAL EXPENSES City recognizes that certain expenses of a non - personal and generally job - affiliated nature are incurred by employee, and hereby agrees to reimburse or to pay said general expenses, and the Finance Director is hereby authorized to disburse such monies upon receipt of duly executed expense or petty cash vouchers, receipts, statements, or personal affidavits. SECTION 11. PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS A. City recognizes its interest in the continued good health of employee, CPO . Employment Agreement -5- July 16, 1980 and agrees to pay all expenses for a comprehensive and annual physical exam- ination of employee, at a clinic in City of his choice. Provided, however, that a copy of the report of said physical examination shall be filed with the Mayor, for the private perusal of the City Council, and, if necessary, use of the personnel office of the City. SECTION 12. VACATION AND SICK LEAVE Employee shall be entitled to the same vacation and sick leave ben- efits as other executive management employees of the City. SECTION 13. DISABILITY, HEALTH, AND LIFE INSURANCE A. City agrees to continue to make required premium payments for employee for insurance policies for life, accident, sickness, disability in- come benefits providing full income if disabled, major medical and dependent's coverage, group insurance currently in force covering employee and his depen- dents. B. City agrees to purchase and pay premiums on whole life insurance policies equal in amount to three times the annual salary of employee, with employee to name beneficiary thereof. C. City agrees to provide and to pay the premium on hospitalization, surgical, comprehensive medical, and dental care insurance for employee and his dependents as done for other employees of the City. D. The City shall provide travel insurance for employee while he is traveling on City business, with employee to name beneficiary thereof. SECTION 14. DEFERRED COMPENSATION RETIREMENT A. In addition to the said base salary set out in Section 4 hereof, City agrees to set aside additional sums equal to fifteen per cent (15 %) of the said base salary or $7,500, whichever is lesser and to invest said set aside sums in the deferred compensation plan. (1) Employer and Employee agree that Employer has provided the Employee with a current copy of the Plan. (2) Employee hereby elects to become a participant in the Plan and to defer payments pursuant to the plan as follows: Employee agrees that his rights to the deferred compensation shall be governed by all terms and conditions of the Plan. The Employee designates his investment objective to be savings and and loan accounts. Employer may recognize this objective, but is not required hereby to do so. ai. Employment Agreement -6- July 16, 1980 (3) Under Section 7 of the Plan, the Employee elects the following distribution of benefits: (4) At Retirement Lump Sum % Installments payable over _years % (not to exceed 15 years) Monthly ` Quarterly _ Annually _ Installments payable for Years of Life Expectancy % (Number of years determined by Standard American mortality tables) Monthly _ Quarterly _ Annually Annuity (monthly) % 10 years certain & life annuity Single life annuity Postpone distribution (election #_) to age (5) At Other Termination (except total disability) Lump Sum % Installments payable monthly over ___years — (not to exceed 10 years) Postpone distribution (election #_) to age (6) At Total Permanent Disability Lump Sum i% Installments payable monthly over _years _% (not to exceed 15 years) Life Annuity (monthly) % (7) At Death to Beneficiary Lump Sum % Installments payable over _ years _% Monthly Quarterly Annually Employment Agreement -7- July 16, 1980 Annuity (Monthly) % Life Annuity 120 months certain & life D. In the event employee accepts employment with another employer and such other employer shall desire to make the payments into said deferred compensation plan, then the employer may at its discretion transfer ownership of employee's share of said program to the new employer. C. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, in the event the services of the employee are at any time terminated because of employee's commission of any legal act involving personal gain to him, then, in that event, employee shall forfeit all future rights in and to such deferred com- pensation plan and the benefits thereof, and employer shall retain all legal and beneficial ownership of said deferred compensation free and clear of employee, his successors, heirs or assigns. D. It is mutually understood and agreed that the right to the monies which may accrue under said deferred compensation plan pursuant to this agreement shall not be subject to sale, encumbrance, hypothecation, assignment, transfer, or levy under a writ of execution, or attachment so long as the employee remains in the employment of employer. E. The City's obligation to pay into said deferred compensation plan shall terminate upon transfer of said benefits to employee or another employer hereunder, or in the event of employee losing his rights to said policies and benefits pursuant to the terms hereof. F. Employee shall have the right to designate the beneficiary or beneficiaries who will receive, in the event of his death, any benefits to which he is entitled under the Plan. Employee reserves the right to change or revoke the beneficiary designation without notice to any beneficiary. SECTION 15. NORMAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM Employee shall be covered by the Public Employees' Retirement System in the same manner as other City employees and City shall pay into said system on behalf of employee in the same manner as for other employees of the City. SECTION 16. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT A. The City Council shall fix any such other terms and conditions of employment, as it may determine from time to time, relating to the performance by employee of the position of City Manager, provided such terms and conditions are not inconsistent with or in conflict with the provisions of this agreement, the City Code, or any other law. B. All provisions of the City Code, and regulations and rules of City relating to vacation and sick leave, retirement and social security system 93. Employment Agreement -8- July 16, 1980 contributions, holidays and other fringe benefits and working conditions as they now exist or hereafter may be amended, also shall apply to employee as they would to other employees of the City, in addition to said benefits enumerated specifically for the benefit of employee, except as herein provided. SECTION 17. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs at law and executors of employee. R. This agreement shall become effective immediately upon execution. C. If any provision of this agreement shall be held invalid, the remainder shall nevertheless be deemed valid and effective, and it is the intention of the parties hereto that each provision hereof is being stipulated separately in the event one or more of such provisions should be held invalid. D. The text herein shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties. E. This agreement shall become effective comencing July, 1980. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has caused this agree- ment to be signed and executed in its behalf by its Mayor, and duly attested by its Deputy City Clerk, and the employee has signed and executed this agree- ment, both in duplicate, the day and year first above written. Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: California Deputy City Clerk (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Lauren i. Wasserman Employee a V. O Street 31.N 3''+.%4NA20IM Sacramento, Calif. 95814 — _ GEOGRAPHICAL r Irt— ssenrrc crc..mn' The undersigned hereby applies for OFF S.SLF, BF FR F k'I:I`[ (®01 CODE J` Dote licenses described as follows: Applied under Sec. 24044 ❑ Issued 2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) Temp. Permit Southland CO[ ^riot ton, The Effective Date: r_ / ; Effective Dale: 3. TYPES) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE LIC. TYPE ,; Vic. - A us 14. 5. Location of Business— Number and Street J I 3L4LJ1& \f311Q1 ULU(" - 6612 C.ai'ebel.ixn AyenueLa City and Zip Code ^uCabta County _ $ Rmc6o Cu ^a "o�_a, 9ity0 San Hemxidi RECEIPT NO. TOTAL �?• % ;� ,/6. If Premises Licensed, 7. Are Premises Inside Show Type of License City Limits? 8, Moiling ddress f di8ere Y e g )--Number and Street rOmpl rrmm) 9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Ad or regulations of the Department per- taining to the Act? NO 11. Explain'. answer to items 9 or 10 on on attachment which shall be deemed port of this application. 12. Appli ant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not vi Dlme or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of 01> Lfl Date JsL 17, 1930 Ureter shi of rem person who, below Wises and < ill N. me appl;<an or IF. ppr<a or on alfie., of he rppli� cop ^r m<a the nloreni mol—lm dotty .11mi -d yr sense IF;o opu<= , b h.1f; Ill rNot he hu. .ad m. rare. shrine approa and "tmy me thereof and mar am and all of be mr.m m<. mad. onu l :I rear p.,.a ales rhan me appr<a orvl ;<r m, bw , . rM apou<a , appr<a bm a b. <anda led order the n I., while rh;, ap11in made. "' rho' 'he nn pli l enntrey mea o rain mesa. i,rymm< pee or a bo o falnll ..1 i mw IPoI I. den p... "`v 'I(. of riNe nrmh. \M*ll rrvpli n holed wlh rb aTranmenr r�ro .-in nnb,nh a refer o n1 for 'Wh In of r nJ.mryor 1. d.rraud w into. an' N1py�,r,YSiJhry rM �ir l r opal ;m'ran nY 6e wirhdto be .nFer he pIlioonr nr the on<ewe. w',1F no r—hiny Imbl'ill to lF. D.pr,lm.m. • C a,+rm }11 VaCWLU s 14. APPLICANT ,_ s s SIGN HERE I -S ; -s y7 Cfl St. eGp. r ------- J - - - -� APPLICATIply, TR/,,MSFEROR - -- 15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Date anw nn by of nd, -rose i9no apgor beraw rbse, and • I N. me nTi<e of the nrpwal I;(e mod p Ibe ter shier ppLm •dal, vylM1ar eetl mate she shier pplim , behnlb •rely olboln hr •11rety mnb, applies ender all interest n In. •t o,bedole I tlnc betl bdrw end r shier ome applie and n1 loo indrornd rhe r por .1 I1,, oapplie form, if •,um 1 nslelr appro.ed by IN, Dire li rem oIN,o nnfer ppl� 1 p,.,. ed 1 Wrier made i,lY 11. pry or o loo o lulhll on Were shut ...... d yin IFnn d... ..di, me doY n ;,home ..f.r applio noliiters wish 11. Depnnm Irblim a pre(n Ifer any nont o more mfes o delraad . any eredFlor of Irani...., a he the I .... for aoph tit, ma,n be e— thdrrown obyenw, she oppInmet w the lissmee with no reruns 11ebiliry so the Dopo,syne,t 16. Name(,) of Licereee(s) 19. __.._ .__..........__._.._Y - lomtion Number and Street City and d Zi Zi r County 18. License Number(,) � Do Not Write Striate This TJnr; For Drpnrlmenl frvr Only Affached: c' Recorded notice, Y' Fiduciary papers, Irl ral.p COPIES MAILED} pC] Renewal: Fee of Paid at Office on Receipt No. Ada 211 ...... o.er T'.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM July 10, 1980 T0: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Replacement of Assistant Planner by Associate Planner ��cn,vlpN ,tg oy o � o r � z :J > 1977 One of the Planning Division's Assistant Planners has just resigned to take a new position in Northern California. This position was originally an "Associate Planner" classification when first authorized. However, upon Management's own initiative, we had reclassified that position to "Assistant Planner" on the basis of better relating the position to ac- tual work performance. Now that the individual holding the position is moving on to a new job, I am requesting reinstatement of the originally budgeted portion of last year. Cost savings can be incurred since we are currently recruiting for another Associate Planner position and we can recruit from the same list rather than advertising twice, one for Associate and one for an Assistant. Furthermore, because of salary savings, there would be no change whatsoever in the budget requested for the cu 71ent fiscal year. JACJIM, Director of Community Development JL:jk a� M o . wv I `w t,CAUn v STAFF REPORT 1, 0 a July 9, 1980 7 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Request Authorization to attend NRPA Conference In the current adopted budget, $300 is shown for attendance of the CPRS conference in Sacramento in March 181. Request authorization to change to NRPA Conference in Phoenix in October '80. Reason for the change of plans is a study of the recently received agenda of the NRPA conference. The program presents a significant number of sessions and topics useful to our program. (While the CPRS conference has been budgeted in 178 and 179, we have not attended, as the scheduled programs were "somewhat lacking" in substance.) As the travel, mileage and hotel rates are comparable between Phoenix and Sacramento, little change in fiscal impact on the budgeted amount is expected. Request agenda item on July 16 for Council consideration BH /mw 97. 1977 QTY OF RAN 40 CUGAMONCA STAFF REPORT July 10, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Subject: N.I.C.D. request for additional funding In the attached self explanatory letter, Dr. Navarro requests an additional $1,120 above the $11,000 previously granted by Council. Dr. Navarro wishes Council consideration of this request on 7/16/80. In an effort to expedite this item, which has been covered in depth by Council previously, it will be placed on consent calendar. Should further discussion be required, it would need be removed from consent calendar. Staff Recommendation: In light of previous action by the City, it would seem appropriate to grant request of additional $1,120. Discussion with Finance Department indicates fund sources are available. If you have any questions, please see me BH/ an National Institute for Community Development Dr. Armando Navarro Fxe.(UlWe Direflor 894 W. Rialto Avenue San Bernardino. CA92410 714.8880207 July 9, 2900 To the Rancho Cucamonga city council: The National Institute for Community Development would like to clarify a misinterpretation of the request for personnel salary presented before the council two weeks ago. At the meeting Dr. Navarro made a presentation requesting $11,noo for the project manager Arturo Ayala for Project 1esperanza in Cucamonga. The $11,000 figure was presented as a gross salary for Mr. Ayala. The figure did not include the " ennloyer's share" of 11? which amounts to $1,17n.n0. This amount, as you know, must he paid in taxes at the federal and state level and includes workman's compensation. I'm sure you realize our budget is very limited and we cannot afford to nay the employer's share from other sources. At the same time you will agree that Mr. Ayala is a very competent, industrious worker, often nutting many extra hours in community work. His full time effort is certainly worth $ll,n ^n annually and to take 119 of this away from his salary would be an injustice to his contributions. Thus we are requesting an additional 119 or $1,111 to cover the employer's share. Thank you for your support and understanding. Sincerely, Dr. Armando Navarro -- .9 9. OROINANCE NO. 113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1062- 401 -11 FROM R -1- 20,000 TO R -1- 10,000 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BANYAN AND AMETHYST STREETS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property herein- after described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. R- 1- 20,000 (single family residential on minimum 20,000 sq. ft, lots) to R -1- 10,000 (single family residential on minimum 10,000 sq. ft. lots). Said Property is located on the southeast corner of Amethyst and Banyan Streets known as Assessor's Parcel Number 1062- 401-11 SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D, Schlosser, Mayor . u e M. Wasserman, T'T.v er _ 36 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 2, 1980 F-1 " w TO: City council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: An Ordinance Establishing Special Drainage Impact Area Attached for Council execution is an Ordinance designating the area north of the Santa Fe Railroad to Arrow Route between Milliken Avenue and Haven Avenue as a Special Drainage Impact Area. The Ordinance requires that prior to the issuance of a Building Permit within the area, the applicant will be required to submit a detailed hydrologic study demonstrating the extent of drainage impact and proposed mitigation measures. The Ordi- nance requires that the City Engineer make findings that the project will not adversely impact the drainage situation in the area. where temporary retention basins are utilized as a mitigation measure, a maintenance agreement will be required and a minimum $2,000 security deposit posted. The Ordinance also modifies the drainage fee Ordinance No. 75 to require full payment of drainage fees for the developed area on any parcel prior to issuance of a building permit for any additions. This is accomplished by deleting Section 4 (c)(3) from Ordinance No. 75 (see attached copy) for the impact area only. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 111 establishing the area north of the Santa Fe Railroad to Arrow Route between the alignment of Milliken Avenue and Haven Avenue. Respectfully submitted, �c �t y�i I� " " �✓ LEH: jaa Attachments 3 ORDINANCE NO. 111 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT ZONE NORTH OF THE SANTA FE RAILROAD TO ARROW ROUTE BETWEEN HAVEN AND MILLIKEN AVENUES, AND REQUIRING DETAILED ENGINEERING STUDIES AND MITIGATION MEASURES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose In recognition of the existence of unique drainage Problem creating potential hazards to public health, safety, and property, the City Council deems it appropriate to establish that portion of the City bounded by: "The Santa Fe Railroad on the south, Arrow Route on the north, Haven Avenue on the west, and the alignment of Milliken Avenue on tht east" as a Special Drainage Impact Zone requiring special engineering studies and mitigations measures as a condition of the issuance of a building permit. SECTION 2: Drainage Study Requirements The City Council finds that prior to the issuance of a Building permit within the Special Impact Zone boundary described in Section 1, the applicant is hereby required to submit for approval of the City Engineer a comprehensive hydrology study prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. This study shall contain the following: Analysis of existing drainage patterns and runoff quantities on the site. 2. The existing ultimate discharge point of site runoff and the general downstream path of runoff. 3. The proposed drainage patterns and increases in runoff quantities generated by site development. 4. Proposed mitigation measures to prevent the discharge of increased storm runoff from the site including proposed construction of master plan facilities sufficient to mitigate downstream damage. 5. Any other information required by the City Engineer to determine the full drainage impacts of the proposed development. Ordinance No. 111 Page 2 SECTION 3: Findings Required for Building Permit Issuance !lo building permit shall be issued for a structure within the Special Impact Zone unless the City Engineer has made the following findings: 1. That the proposed project will not increase storm runoff from the site except where Master Plan Drainage facilities exist to accept said runoff. 2. That the project by reasons of low -flow non -storm related water will not create a public nuisance. 3. That the project will not divert or concentrate flows in such a manner as to adversely effect downstream properties. To insure this finding, the City Engineer may require a drainage acceptance letter or easement from the adjacent downstream property. 4. That where on -site retention facilities have been proposed a sufficient maintenance contract has been executed and security posted to insure proper maintenance of said facility. Minimum security for maintenance shall be $2,000 or such other higher amount as set by the City Council upon recommendation of the City Engineer. S. That all facilities proposed are in conformance with City standards for design and construction. These findings will be made subject to conditions established by the City Engineer based upon the findings of the approved Drainage Study. SECTION 4: Security for Construction of Required drainage improvements Where the findings required by Section 3 are based on conditions requiring the construction of drainaqe improvements, no building permit shall be issued until an agreement and bonds, letters of credit, cash deposit, or other acceptable form of security have been posted and accepted by the City Council to insure the construction of required facilities. SECTION 5: Drainage Fee Provisions (a) Where a building permit is sought for in addition to existing development within the Special Drainage Zone, the building permit shall not be issued until drainage fees under the provisions of City Ordinances have been paid for the entire developed area of the site. The developed area shall be as defined in Section 4(c)(2) of Ordinance 75 and shall be determined by the Building Official. 33 Ordinance No. 111 Page 3 (b) Within the Special Drainage Impact Zone, the provision of Section 3(c)(3) of Ordinance No. 75 shall not apply. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerks a7T'ause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor 311 CI)J k�, //P. CITY OF RANGiO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 2, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer CCCA,NO VV E\ cam° �o < 'n G 7 C - O A V > 1977 SUBJECT: Proposed Increase for Industrial Storm Drain Fee Attached for Council execution is an Ordinance to adopt the revised industrial area storm drain plan for the area bounded by the City limits on the South, Foothill Boulevard on the North and lying between Deer and Day Creeks. In addition, the Ordinance will raise storm drain fees within the area from $2,500 /acre to $4,600 /acre. The raised fee reflects actual increases in the cost of providing the proposed system. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt Ordinance 112 adopting the Industrial Area Master Plan of Drainage and establishing a fee of $4,500 per acre with the drainage area. Respectfully submitted, i LEH: jaa Attachments ORDINANCE NO. 112 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA, MAKING ORDINANCE NO. 75 APPLICABLE THERETO, AND ESTABLISHING A DRAINAGE FEE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose. Since the adoption of Ordinance No. 75, the City has caused additional drainage studies to be made within the City. These studies have now identified certain areas within the City where special drainage problems exist, and with respect to which the cost of planned drainage facilities to provide proper drainage are higher, on a per acre basis, than in the rest of the City. Accordingly, the City Council deems it appropriate to establish that portion of the City Bounded by: "Deer Creek on the west, Day Creek on the east, the south City limit, and on the north by the Centerline of Foothill Boulevard" as a separate local drainage area to be known as the "industrial local drainage area ". The City Council further finds and determines that the remaining territory of the City shall remain one local drainage area subject to all of the provisions of Ordinance No. 75. SECTION 2: Drainage Plan and Industrial Local Drainage Area. The comprehensive storm drain plans, the index thereto and the appropriate plan sheets for the industrial local drainage area together with construction costs and other related material, which documents entitled Industrial Area Drainage Master Plan prepared by L.D. King are hereby found and declared to be the drainage plan for the industrial local drainage area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For the purposes of this Ordinance, planned drainage facilities shall mean drainage facilities contained within the drainage plan. The City Council finds that drainage problems are approximately of equal magnitude in all areas of the industrial local drainage area. SECTION 3: Provisions of Ordinance No. 75 Made Applicable. All provisions of Ordinance No. 75, except the provisions of Section 2 thereof, and except as otherwise amended by this Ordinance, shall be applicable to the industrial local drainage area. Where the context so requires, the term "local drainage area" shall include the "industrial local drainage area ". 3fo Ordinance No. 112 Page 2 SECTION 4: Amount of Fee. (a) The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance with respect to land within the industrial local drainage area is $46 per one hundreth (100th) of an acre or fraction thereof. SECTION 5: Exemptions. No fee shall he required pursuant to this Ordinance for any land within the industrial local drainage area upon which there has been levied an assessment in connection with an improvement district formed on or after the effective date of this Ordinance for the construction of drainage facilities. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteeen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newpaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 37 ORDINANCE NO. 110 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION AND DELEGATING ADMINISTRATION THEREOF TO THE CITY MANAGER• WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore by resolution enacted certain personnel policies and compensation rules; and, WHEREAS, the said previous resolutions were not all encompassing and it appears to be both desirable and necessary to develop a compre- hensive system governing the administration of all personnel matters within the City government; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of implementing the most modern and effective system of personnel administration possible and such system has now been developed and has heretofore been reviewed by said City Council, which is desirous of fully implementing such system; and, WHEREAS, such system is deemed to be in essential compliance with all applicable federal and state laws, rulings and regulations governing fair, equal and bias -free public personnel administration and management, hiring, promotion and other such personnel practices; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Manager is hereby delegated the following powers, authority and /or duties: 1. to develop, adopt, review, revise and readopt a position classification plan encompassing all categories of appointed city employees. 2. to develop, adopt, review, revise and readopt comprehensive personnel rules, forms and procedures governing the details of all personnel administration and management encompassing all categories of appointed city employees. 3. to develop, review, revise, survey and to recommend to the City Council for its adoption a salary plan encompassing all categories of appointed city employees and to administer such plan after adoption by the City Council. 4. to act as City Personnel Officer and to have the authority to delegace such duties inherent therein to a management employee as he shall deem appropriate, in whale or in part, by issuance of appropriate administrative orders. 38 Ordinance No. 110 page 2 5. to keep the Council informed of changes affecting major personnel policy, the City employee force or personnel impacts on the Community. 6. to determine the pay of designated management employees within minimums and maximums as set by Council resolution provided, however, any such pay change for any such management employee is reported to the Council in executive session, together with the reasons why such pay adjustment is to be made and how such individual employee's personal performance and qualifications warrant such pay rate change. SECTION 2: The City Manager shall be covered by said rules and regulations as they may apply to perquisites, fringe benefits and working conditions except that the City Council may enter into an employment agreement with the City Manager to expand, clarify, supplement, define and restrict such benefits as it shall deem appropriate, including, but not limited to the following: (a) termination pay, (b) personal use of city vehicle, (c) City -paid deferred compensation at a percentage of base pay greater than that provided to other management employees, (d) additional sick leave, vacation and conference attendance, (e) revised working hours in recognition of the exigencies Of the position, (f) meritorious and longevity pay and bonuses, (g) supplemental retirement benefits, and (h) other benefits and perquisites peculiar to the office of City Manager. SECTION 3: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be uncon- stitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional. SECTION 4: Resolution numbers 79 -48 and 79 -49 are hereby repealed. SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor Lauren M. Wasserman, City Cler 39 ORDINANCE NO. 66 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 66 PERTAINING TO THE INELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY THE CITY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 1 of Ordinance No. 66 of the City is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 1: No person convicted (including pleas of guilty and nolo contendre) of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude shall be eligible for employment by any department of the City; provided, however, the appointing authority shall disregard such conviction if it is found and determined by such appointing authority that mitigating circumstances exist, such as, but not limited to, evidence of rehabilitation, the length of time elapsed since such conviction, the age of such person at the time of the conviction, or the fact that the classification applied for is unrelated to such conviction. ". SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of ,1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk V6 Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. I� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 14 AND ORDINANCE NO. 18. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Ordinance No. 14 of the City is hereby repealed. SECTION 2: Ordinance No. 18 of the City is hereby repealed. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ik day of l 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST City Clerk It/ ORDINANCE NO. )) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING GEN- ERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND OTHER CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: (a) Any person violating any of the provisions or failing to comply with any of the mandatory requirements of the Ordinances of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, unless the violation is made an infraction by Ordinance. (b) Except in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by any Ordinance of the City, any person convicted of a misdemeanor for violation of an Ordi- nance of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, is punishable by a fine of not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), or by imprisonment not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprison- ment. (c) Any person convicted of an infrac- tion for violation of an Ordinance of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, is punishable by: (1) A fine not exceeding Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for a first violation; (2) A fine not exceeding One Hun- dred Dollars ($100.00) for a second violation of the same Ordinance or code within one (1) year; and, (3) A fine not exceeding Two Hun- dred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) for each additional violation of the same Ordinance or code within one (1) year. (d) Each such person shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of the Ordinances of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of,. the City, is committed, continued or permitted by any such person, and he shall be punishable accordingly. (e) In addition to the penalties pro- vided for by this Ordinance, or elsewhere by Ordinance or by any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, any condition caused or permitted to exist in violation of any of the provisions of the Ordinances of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, shall be deemed a public nuisance and may be abated by the City, and each day such condition continues shall be regarded as a new and separate offense. (f) In any civil action commenced by the City to abate a public nuisance, to enjoin a violation y of any provision of any Ordinance of the City, or any code adopted by reference by Ordinance of the City, the City shall be entitled to recover from the defendant(s) in any such action reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PA SED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 411 -, 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk X-% ORDINANCE NO. 116 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR USE IN THE INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF ALL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NOW EXISTING OR HEREAFTER ENACTED. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Definitions. The following words and phrases, whenever used in the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, shall be construed as defined in this section unless from the context a different meaning is intended or unless a different meaning is specifically defined and more particularly directed to the use of such words or phrases: (a) "City" and "town" each mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, or the area within the territorial limits of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and such territory outside of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, over which the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has jurisdiction or control by virtue of any constitutional or statutory provision. (b) "Council" means the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calffornia. "All its members" or "all councilmen" means the total number of councilmembers holding office. (c) "County" means the County of San Bernardino, California. (d) "Law" denotes applicable federal law, the Constitution and statutes of the State of California, the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California and when appropriate, any and all rules and regulations which may be promulgated thereunder. (e) "May" is permissive. (f) "Month" means a calendar month. (g) "Must" and "shall" are each mandatory. (h) "Oath" includes an affirmation or declaration in all cases in which, by law, an affirmation may be substituted for an oath, and in such cases the words "swear" and "sworn" shall be equivalent to the words "affirm" and "affirmed ". (i) "Owner ", applied to a building or land, includes any part owner, joint owner, tenant in common, joint tenant, tenant by the entirety, of the whole or a part of such building or land. vy Ordinance No. 116 Page 2 (j) "Person" includes a natural person, joint venture, joint stock company, partnership, association, club, company, corporation, business, trust, organization, or the manager, lessee, agent, servant, officer or employee of any of them. (k) "Personal property" includes money, goods, chattels, things in action and evidences of debt. (1) "preceding" and "following" mean next before and next after, respectively. (m) "Property" includes real and personal property. (n) "Real property' includes lands, tenements and hereditaments. (o) "Sidewalk" means that portion of a street between the curbline and the adjacent property line intended for the use of pedestrians. (p) "State" means the State of California. (q) "Street" includes all streets, highways, avenues, lanes, alleys, courts, places, squares, curbs, or other public ways in this City which have been or may hereafter be dedicated and open to public use, or such other public property so designated in any law of this State. (r) "Tenant" and occupant ", applied to a building or land, include any person who occupies the whole or a part of such building or land, whether alone or with others. (s) "Written" includes printed, typewritten, mimeographed, multigraphed, or otherwise reproduced in permanent visible form. SECTION 2: Title of Office. Use of the title of any officer, employee, department, board or commission means that officer, employee, department, board or commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. SECTION 3: Interpretation of Language. All words and phrases shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the language, but technical words and phrases and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in the law shall be construed and understood according to such peculiar and appropriate meaning. If Ordinance No. 116 Page 3 SECTION 4: Grammatical Interpretation. The following grammatical rules shall apply in the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, unless it is apparent from the context that a different construction is intended: (a) Gender. Each gender includes the masculine, feminine and neuter genders. (b) Singular and Plural. The singular number includes the plural and the plural includes the singular. (c) Tenses. Words used in the present tense include the past and the future tenses and vice versa, unless manifestly inapplicable. SECTION 5: Acts by Agents. When an act is required by an Ordinance, the same being such that it may be done as well by an agent as by the principal, such requirement shall be construed to include all such acts performed by an authorized agent. SECTION 6: Prohibited Acts Include Causing and Permitting. Whenever in the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, any act or omission is made unlawful, it shall include causing, allowing, permitting, aiding, abetting, suffering, or concealing the fact of such act or omission. SECTION 7: Computation of Time. Except when otherwise provided, the time within which an act is required to be done shall be computed by excluding the first day and including the last day, unless the last day is Sunday or a holiday, in which case it shall also be excluded. SECTION 8: Consturction. The provisions of the Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and all proceedings under them are to be construed with a view to effect their objects and to promote justice. SECTION 9: Repeal Shall Not Revive Any Ordinances. The repeal of an Ordinance shall not repeal the repealing clause of any Ordinance or revive any Ordinance which has been repealed thereby. SECTION 10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, uity uierK YG Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor QTY OF RANCHO CL ANIDWA SEU F REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 [_Y,)a I U TO: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Revision to Ordinance 28 and 58 making provisions for postponement of street improvements Attached for Council approval are Ordinances 28 -A and 58 -B making provisions to allow mechanisms for the Council to postpone improvements currently required to be constructed under existing Ordinances. Where the postponement is approved by the Council a lien agreement will be required to insure future construction of improvements at such time that construction becomes feasible. The Ordinances are general in nature allowing full discretion on the part of the Council. Appeals for postponement will be analyzed by the Staff for recommendation to the Planning Commission who shall forward a recommendation to the Council for final determination. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve Ordinances 28 -A and -B. Respectfully submitted, LLH:bi(X � Attachments y7 ORDINANCE NO. 28 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUB- SECTION (f) OF SECTION 2.12 OF ORDINANCE NO. 28 TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS BE CON- STRUCTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF NINE (9) MONTHS FOLLOWING THE RECORDATION OF A PARCEL MAP FOR EACH LOT UPON WHICH THERE EXISTS A BUILDING OR OTHER USABLE STRUCTURE AT THE TIME OF SUCH RECORDATION. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Sub - section (f) of Section 2.12 of Ordinance No. 28 is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City Council hereby finds that it is necessary for reasons of public health and safety that all off -site improvements be constructed within a period of nine (9) months following the recordation of a parcel map for each lot on which there exists a building or other usable structure at the time of such recordation. The foregoing provisions not withstanding, the City Council, upon receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission may postpone the construction of off -site improvements to such later time as it shall, at its discretion, determine. "No postponement of construction shall be granted by the City Council unless the owner of the subject parcel shall agree in writing to construct required off -site improve- ments at such future time as shall then or thereafter be determined by the City Council. Said contract shall create a lien upon the property to be divided as security for the performance of said agreement, Any such written contract and lien agreement shall be recorded with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County immediately subsequent to the recordation of the subject parcel map. ". SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Oai1y Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phil ip D. Schlosser, Ra yor ATTEST: yP ORDINANCE NO. 58 -B AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 58 TO PER- MIT THE USE OF LIEN AGREEMENTS AS SECURITY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 6 of Ordinance No. 58 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 6. Construction of Public Improvements - Prerequi- site to Approval of the Building official. "(a) Except as provided in Section 5, the Building Official shall deny issuance of a building permit, or deny approval for occupancy or deny final approval and acceptance for public utility connections to any building or parking lot until required full frontage improvements exist, or are constructed or their construction is guaranteed by an executed agreement and cash money deposited with the City in a sum approved by the City Engineer based upon one - and - one -half (1 -112) times the estimated cost of construction. (b) In the event construction of full frontage improvements is not required to be completed within six (6) months after the issuance of the building permit, the City Engineer may, at his option, require that a lien upon the property to be improved be created by contract between the owner and the City as security for the performance by the owner of the construction guarantee agreement instead of a cash deposit. In the event a lien agreement is required pursuant to this section, no building permit shall be issued until said lien agreement is recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ". SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk s a 1 cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren W.Tasserman, City TerTc _ y9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM July 9, 1980 TO: City Council /City Manager FROM! Finance Director SUBJECT: Revenue Sharing As we are all aware, the Revenue Sharing Program will expire at the end of the current entitlement period (E,P. 11). While no payments after October 1980 are currently authorized, the present administration has before the Congress a proposal for a five -year re- authorization of payments to local governments. As can be anticipated, the administration proposal carries with it a number of modifications; modifications aimed at changing the al- location formula. Due to adjustments in population for Rancho Cucamonga, the Revenue Sharing allocation has been increased by $28,375.00 to give the City a total of $212,615.00. It is recommended to appropriate Revenue Sharing in its entirety to support the contract requirements of the Sheriffs Department. With rising costs and the addition of staff, and with recent leg- islation such as Proposition -13 and Proposition 4, it becomes exceedingly difficult to find alternate revenue sources to support the very basics of programs such as the Sheriff contract provides. It seems that it may be appropriate to keep Revenue Sharing in the single program that it currently supports. Should Revenue Sharing end the City will be faced with seeking alternate financing for only the one program as opposed to trying to finance several. 5 b CITY OF RANCHO CLCAtVKXrA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 UR TO: City Council and City Manager LL FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Award of "North Town" Street Improvement Project On July 8, 1980, bids were received on the "North Town" Street Improvement project. The low bidder was Robert Escudero, Inc. at $297,134.22. The Engineer's estimate for the project was $330,000.00. The Staff has analyzed the bids and finds them correct and acceptable. Mr. Escudero recently completed the Base Line (FAU) project and proved to be a cooperative and competent contractor. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council award the "North Town" Street Improvement project to Robert Escudero, Inc. at $297,134.22 plus a 108 contingency and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute contracts on their behalf. Respectfully submitted, LBH: jaa Attachment S1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT "NORTH TOWN" STRFFT ANO ORA1NAr.F IMPROVEMENTS BATE JULY CONTRACT NO. ITE`4S QUANTITIES Robert Escudero Inc Matich Cor oratio Flemain ENG NE Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Bidder's Bond 1 Clearing & grubbing L.S. 3,000.0 13,000.00 6,000.0 26,000.00 7,862. 7,862.37 8,000. 0 48,000.0 2 Earthwork 1600 C. . 29.8 7,696.00 24.0 38,400.00 8.00 12,800.00 6. 0 9,600.0 3 P.C.C. rolled curb & gutter 273 L.F. 6.4f 1,763.58 6. 01 1,638.00 6.00 1,638.00 7.00 1,911.0 4 P.C.C. curb & gutter 9485 L.F. 6.4%1,273.10 6.11 57,858.50 6.95 65,920.75 7. 00 66,395.0 5 P.C.C. sidewalk 37142 S F. 1.147,170.34 1.6 59,427.20 1.50 55,713.00 2. 0 74,284.0 6 A.C. paving 1508 To s 29.44,184.40 30.0 45,240.00 32.00 48,256.00 32. 0 48,256.0 7 P.C.C. drive approach 18236 SF. 1.28,265.80 2.0 36,472.00 2.00 36,472.00 2.0 43,766.4 8 P.C.C. alley approach 1720 S.R. 3.5,504.00 2.75 4,730.00 2.35 4,042.00 2.10 4,128.0 9 A.C. berm, placement 585 L.F� 1.8 1,082.25 2.0 1,170.00 2.06 1,205.10 4. 0 2,340.0 10 A.C. drainage Swale & tonne Lion to existing drain pipe 125 S.F 5.0 630.00 6.0 756.00 7.00 882.00 2. 0 252.0 11 Type "L" or Type "K" marker 10 EA 30.0 300.00 40.0 400.00 27.00 270.00 35. 0 350.0 12 Raising manholes to grade 8 EA 190.0 1,520.00 400.0 3,200.00 350.00 2,800.00 200.0 1,600.0 13 4" cast iron drain pipe 178 L.F 11.0 11958.00 13.0 2,314.00 15.00 2,670.00 12.0 2,136.0 14 12" CMP, 16 gage 37 L.F. 65.0 2,405.00 125.0 4,625.00 40.00 1,480.00 30.0 1,110.0 L 1. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT "NORTH TOWN" STRFFT AND DRAINAGF 1MPROVFMFNTS DATE JULY 8, LOCATION CONTRACT NO. ITEMS QUANTITIES Robert Escudero,Inc Matich Corporatioi Flemnin q Eno. ENGINEER'S ESTIMAT- Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Anount Bid Bidder's Bond 15 Catch basin, Type "A" 1 EA 2200.00 2,200.00 3000.00 3,000.00 1500.0 1,500.00 1500.0 1,500.00 16 P.L.C. Cross gutter S snandra 4546 S.F. 3.75 17,047.50 2.75 12,501.50 3.0 13,638.00 2.4 10,910.40 17 P.C.C. driveway transitions 2107 S.F. 3.75 7,901.25 2.00 4,214.00 2.0 4,214.00 2.4 5.056.80 18 Asphalt concrete driveway transitions, placement only 7842 S F. 1.50 11,763.00 1.00 7,842.00 .8E 6,665.70 1.0 7,842.00 19 Concrete block wall 35 L.F. 42.00 1,470.00 30.00 1,050.00 28.0 980.00 16.0 560.00 1 a 297,134.22 310,838.20 299,008.92 330 ,000.OD SFAFF REPORT <� F 1977 DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbe, City Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Carnelian Street Realignment and Landscape Design Contracts Attached for Council execution are design contracts with Genge Consultants for the realignment of Carnelian Street and the landscape improvement of the Carnelian parkway areas from Foothill Blvd. to Hillside St. Both of these projects were included in this year's budget for construction. Genge Consultants recently completed the landscape concept plan for Carnelian Street, which was approved by the Planning Commi- ssion and the City Council. Because of funding constraints, the project will be phased. Phase I will cover the parkway areas from Foothill Blvd. to Base Line with some work at the intersection with 19th Street. Phase II will complete the project from Base Line to Hillside. The Phase I design cost shall not exceed $19,125.00 and Phase II $23,625.00. Genge was chosen to complete plans for the realignment of Carnelian through the "S" curve area south of Base Line in order to insure full coordination between the street and landscape design efforts. The realignment design contract is not to exceed a budget of $18,700.00. It would be expected that both construction projects will be coordinated for concurrent con- struction. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve execution of design contracts with Genge Consultants for the realignment and land- scape improvement of Carnelian Street from Foothill Blvd. to Hillside Street. Respectfully sybmitted, LBH:jaa Attachment 5-y Gong. Consultants 17500 Red Hill Avenue Telephone of Southern California Suite 204 714/7546222 Irvine, California Engineers, Planners 92714 & Surveyors July 10, 1980 City of Cucamonga Community Development Department 9340 Base Line Street, Suite A Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Regarding: Proposal for Landscape Architectural Services - Landscape Construction Documents for Carnelian Street Dear Mr. Hubbs: Genge Consultants is pleased to submit this contract in response to your request. This contract addresses Phase II, construction documentation and contract administration, Phase I (Analysis and Conceptual Landscape Design) being recently completed. Genge Consultants enjoyed working with the City staff in providing the Phase I product, and look forward to continuing service to the City. The following contract summarizes our Scope of Work and Fees for Phase II, Construction Documentation. As in the previous work effort, Genge Consultants fully intends to meet the City's time frame for completion of all tasks. Respectfully submitted, GENGE CONSULTANTS OF r,SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA � Myron E.Br M owning Vice President JSL:MEB /aes S5' J. § 44, J. Stephen Long Planning Director AGREEMENT FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES This agreement is made and entered into this day of July, 1980, between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY ", and GENGE CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, duly licensed Landscape Architects of 17500 Red Hill Avenue, Irvine, California, 92714, hereinafter referred to as "ARCHITECT'. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City has need for landscape architectural services to prepare landscape construction documents and provide contract administration for the land- scape development of the parkways along Carnelian Street, southerly of Hillside Drive to northerly of Foothill Boulevard (approximately three miles in length) and to provide supplementary services (coordination, soils analysis, blueprinting) for same, herein referred to as "PROJECT ". WHEREAS, the CITY has invited the ARCHITECT to provide required land scaping services for the CITY; WHEREAS, the ARCHITECT has specialized knowledge, training and experience in landscape design and construction; AND, WHEREAS, the ARCHITECT indicates willingness to perform landscaping services for the CITY under contract. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and the ARCHITECT, for the considerations hereinafter named, agree as follows: S(f ARTICLE 1: The ARCHITECT agrees to furnish and perform the various professional services, pertinent to landscape construction documentation as follows: A. Private Property Owner Coordination - I. Meetings /Coordination with private property owners (and mainten- ance staff) in two project intersection areas necessary to implement concept plans. B. Soils Analysis - Prior to the commencement of construction drawings a thorough soils analysis will be completed to establish soil characteristics and nutrient level. C. Preparation of landscape construction documents - The approved Concept "B" shall serve as the basis for the following contract documents. Project limits for Phase I shall be: Foothill Boulevard north to Baseline Road, the intersections of Carnelian /Baseline and Carnelian /16th Street. Phase II shall include all additional parkway areas not covered under Phase 1, between Foothill Boulevard and Hillside Road, 1. Demolition Plan @ 1:40, graphically depicting and dimensioning paved areas, plant material, etc. which shall be demolished prior to construction beginning. 2. Staking /Hardscape Plan @ 1:40 fully dimensioning paved and planted areas, landscape mounding, walkway widths, etc. Construction details and specifications will be furnished. 3. Landscape Irrigation Plans for fully automatic sprinkler system for all landscaped areas, to include location and types of all equipment, details, legends, and specifications. 4. Landscape Planting Plans for all planted areas to include location, types, and sizes of all trees, shrubs, and ground cover with pertinent details and specifications. S? 5. Final Cost Estimate based on current construction costs for all proposed landscape construction items. 6. Colored planting and hardscape construction plans for presentation to Planning Commission. D. Contract Administration /Field Observation - Upon initiation of the bidding process by the City, Genge Consultants will perform the following tasks: a. Assist in answering contractor's questions regarding clarification/ interpretation of plans during bidding. b. Assistance in evaluation of bids. C. Assistance in construction observation at key stages of construction to insure plan conformance. (Not to exceed (5) job visits per phase of construction). E. Duplication and Blueprinting - A high volume of construction documents is anticipated for this project. Approximately twenty -five (25) copies of land scape construction drawings for each phase and an equal number of bid documents is estimated. All correspondence and protect meeting notes shall be duplicated and distributed to all designated officials. (Note: Original tracings shall become property of the CITY upon completion of this agreement.) F. Mileage - Travel to and from the job site will be necessary throughout both design and construction. Genge has included mileage allowance in the Budget Summary at .25 per mile. ARTICLE II - The CITY agrees to pay the ARCHITECT, as compensation for the above -named professional services: SS A. For all items listed in Sections A thru F of Article 1, the CITY will compensate the ARCHITECT at the hourly rates attached as Exhibit "A ". The total of these hourly charges shall not exceed the amounts listed on the Phase Cost Break- out. PHASE COST BREAKOUT (Not to Exceed) PHASE 1 A. Private Property Owner Coordination - $3,000.00 B. Soils Analysis 625.00 C. Landscape Construction Documents - 10,000.00 D. Contract Administration /Field Observation 3,250.00 E. Duplication and Blueprinting 2,000.00 G. Mileage 250.00 TOTAL PHASE 1: $19,125.00 PHASE II (Shall not begin without prior authorization from City.) A. Landscape Construction Documents $17,125.00 B. Contract Administration /Field Observation 3,250.00 C. Duplication and Blueprinting 3,000.00 D. Mileage 250.00 TOTAL PHASE II: $23,625.00 B. The ARCHITECT will submit monthly billings including a summary of the hours worked by each classification, the hourly rate, and the total charges for each classification. ARTICLE III - If the work is suspended indefinitely or abandoned prior to completion of the Landscaping Services set forth in this Agreement, the CITY agrees to pay the ARCHITECT, at the rates set forth in Article 11 above, to the time of said suspension or abandonment, which payment is to be the full and final settlement for all the work performed by the ARCHITECT to said time, and such work shall become the property of the Cl fY upon said payment. S1 ARTICLE IV - All terms, conditions and provisions hereof shall inure to and shall bind the parties herein, their successors and assigns. ARTICLE V - The ARCHITECT hereby designates J. Stephen Long, Project Manager/ Director of Planning and Alan Fishman, Landscape Architect as its representatives for this PROJECT. ARTICLE VI - The ARCHITECT shall begin work immediately following the approval and signing of this Agreement. The ARCHITECT shall perform the work in a timely and efficient manner according to the following schedule: PHASE I - 90 days from date of authorization to first plan check. PHASE II - 90 days from date of authorization to first plan check. ARTICLE VII SCOPE OF WORK MODIFICATION In the event the Scope of Work should change to a degree that will alter the fee, the ARCHITECT will contact the CITY in writing, and a revised fee, if necessary, will be established through negotiation. Requests for extra work will be documented, and a completion time and compensation amount will be submitted for City approval. ARTICLE VIII SCOPE OF WORK EXCLUSIONS include the following: 1. Additional unforseen coordination efforts encountered during performance of Scope of Work. These efforts will be identified to CITY. 2. Fees, permits, etc. 3. Design of specific street furniture items. 4. Major modifications, changes by staff to council approved Conceptual Street- scape design. Ge IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Rancho Cucamonga MSA:nss (of CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: _ Mayor By: City Clerk GENGE CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA By Myron E. Browning Vice - President /Principa 400 AGREEMENT FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES This agreement is made and entered into this day of July, 1980, between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY ", and GENGE CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, duly licensed civil engineers of 17500 Red Hill Avenue, Irvine, California, 92714, herein- after referred to as "ENGINEER ". \PITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY has need for civil engineering services to prepare prelimin- ary and final construction documents for Carnelian Street between Baseline and Foothill Boulevard (approximately 1500 lineal feet in length) and to provide supple- mentary services (coordination, blueprinting) for same, herein referred to as "PRO- JECT'. WHEREAS, the CITY has invited the ENGINEER to provide required civil engineering services for the CITY; WHEREAS, the ENGINEER has specialized knowledge, training and experience in civil engineering and surveying. AND, WHEREAS, the ENGINEER indicates willingness to perform civil engineer- ing services for the CITY under contract. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and the ENGINEER, for the considerations hereinafter named, agree as follows: (Oa ARTICLE 1: The ENGINEER agrees to furnish and perform the various professional services, pertinent to civil engineering construction documentatin as follows: A. Perform a field topo grading survey from approximately stations 10 + 00 to 25 + 00. 1. This means to provide a cross - section at 25 foot intervals. Cross - sections to include existing top of curb, elevations, existing flowline elevations, and existing centerline and /or crown line elevations within existing right -of- way and sufficient additional topo outside of right -of -way necessary. B. Provide one preliminary design for Carnelian Street from approximately Stations 10 +00 to 25 +00. 1. This preliminary design shall be prepared at a I" = 40' scale in 'red -line" format only. 2. Based upon preliminary design, prepare a preliminary cost estimate. 3. Based upon preliminary design, prepare a preliminary set of calculations for right -of -way acquisition. C. Coordinate with San Bernardino County Flood Control for design parameters and constraints related to construction of Cucamonga Channel as it effects road design. D. Based upon preliminary design and coordination with San Bernardino County Flood Control, prepare a design evaluation report for city review. ARTICLE II: The ENGINEER agrees to furnish and perform the various additional professional services, pertaining to civil engineering construction documentation as follows: A. Final drafted set of construction documents for Carnelian Street from approxi- mately Stations 10 + 00 to 25 + 00. !03 1. This means to provide all street improvement plans and profiles at a scale of I" = 40' in conformance with City format. This will include details and a title sheet. B. Provide a final cost estimate based upon the final construction drawings. C. The final drafted set of construction documents shall include any realignment of existing sewer and /or water lines. All other utility decoration and /or design is this Scope of Work. This specifically excludes any Hydrology and /or hydraulic design and /or elevations. D. The final construction documents shall include all material specifications suit- able for bidding (follow City format). ARTICLE III: The ENGINEER agrees to furnish and perform the various additional professional services, pertinent to construction surveying as follows: A. Provide one set of curb and gutter stakes at 251 intervals and at EC's and BC's for the final Carnelian Street design from approximately Stations 10 + 00 to 25 + 00. Any re- staking will be performed as a time and material extra. B. Any utility staking for sewer, water, storm drain, gas, electric, telephone and /or cable television is outside this Scope of Work. Any such work shall be performed on a time and materials basis as an extra. ARTICLE IV: The ENGINEER agrees to furnish the following reproductions and originals: A. One set of inked originals. B. Up to 25 sets of bluelines of the final plans and material specifications. C. All travel time, mileage, and deliveries for transmittal of information to and from the CITY. (0 y ARTICLE V: The CITY agrees to pay the ENGINEER, as compensation for the above - named professional services: A. For all items listed in Sections A thru D of Article 1, the CITY will compensate the ENGINEER at the hourly rates attached as Exhibit "A ". The total of these hourly charges shall not exceed $8,500.00. B. For all items listed in Sections A thru D of Article II, the CITY will compensate the ENGINEER at the hourly rates attached as Exhibit "A ". The total of those hourly charges shall not exceed $5,850.00. C. For all items listed in Sections A and B inclusive of Article III, the CITY will compensate the ENGINEER at the hourly rates attached as Exhibit "A ". The total of these hourly charges shall not exceed $3,500.00. D. For all items listed in Sections A thru C inclusive of Article IV, the CITY will compensate the ENGINEER at costs plus 10 percent for reproductions. Mileage will be billed at $0.25 per mile. The total of these charges shall not exceed $850.00. E. COST BREAKOUT (Not to Exceed) ARTICLE L Topographic Survey and Preliminary $ 8,500.00 "Redline" Design and Report ARTICLE II. Final Inked Construction Plans, Specifications & Cost Estimate 5,850.00 ARTICLE III. Construction Staking For Curb /Gutter 3,500.00 ARTICLE IV. Reproductions and Deliveries 850.00 TOTAL (Not to Exceed $18,700.00 F. The ENGINEER will submit monthly billings including a summary of the hours worked by each classification, the hourly rate, and the total charges for each classification. 6 s ARTICLE VI: - If the work is suspended indefinitely or abandoned prior to completion of the civil engineering set forth in this Agreement, the CITY agrees to pay the ENGINEER, at the rates set forth in Article V above, to the time of said suspension or abandonment, which payment is to be the full and final settlement for all the work performed by the ENGINEER to said time, and such work shall become the property of the CITY upon said payment. ARTICLE VII: - All terms, conditions and provisions hereof shall inure to and shall bind the parties herein, their successors and assigns. ARTICLE Vlll: - The ENGINEER hereby designates Myron E. Browning, Vice- Presi- dent /Principal and Earl Gardner, Project Manager /Project Engineer as its representa- tives for this PROJECT. ARTICLE IX: - The ENGINEER shall begin work immediately following the approval and signing of this Agreement. The ENGINEER shall perform the work in a timely and efficient manner in accordance with the attached time schedule. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, Rancho Cucamonga MSA:nss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: By: City Clerk GENGE CONSULTANTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA By: �• rm tl Myron E. rowning Vice - President /Princi 67 400 CITY OF RAND 10 CI,YAn10NCA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Rubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: San Bernardino County Flood Control Benefit Assessment Program Staff recently transmitted to the Council a report from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District on its proposed Benefit Assessment Program. This program as currently con- structed, will place an assessment on property owners in Rancho Cucamonga of $14 per year for the Basic Assessment Unit which is a standard 7200 sq. ft. single family house. This assessment under law can be established by the Board of Supervisors after proper public hearing. The program there- after must be ratified by 509 of the voters in an election. It is the County's plans that 1960 -81 assessment of $14 will be established at a hearing July 14, 1980 with a more fully developed program to be submitted to the voters at the November election. The District is attempting to structure a program which will contain a $19 assessment for regional facility maintenance and construction and some additional amount to be established by Cities for storm drain construction. The program seems to have great promise in giving everyone an opportunity to solve drainage problems, however, it is develop- ing too quickly to allow a thorough review by the Cities. City Engineers in the West Valley area recently met and expressed this concern to Flood Control District staff and requested delay in Board action on assessments until the program can be further reviewed by the Cities and the Flood Control Zone Advisory Committee. Attached is a letter from Mayor Ellingwood of Ontario which expresses the concern expressed by most of the City Engineers. Councilman Bridge and myself will be attending the July 14 hearing and additional meetings scheduled for next week. More information will be available for the July 16 Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, x� a cC#:!_ ID � r� ter... 11 eC3 CONE _71! _ pt 6.1151 C,:;: A`1 _FR{I P. E. tlea EIIINGVi00D RrSGER U. HUGHEAW l Cary :Aanagr P03F.kE K. . ABEL July 7, 19SO CILORIS E. ARTER3UPN IIOLIER F. 3RIGG3 CH, 0.,k SAYE MYERi OASTRei KENNETH 'A KEENLY BEECHER n1EGLIN Coy ircewrzr CwnAl Membn San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors 17S licst Fifth Street San Bernardino, California Gentlemen: Rh: 17LOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT At its meeting; of July 1, 1950, the Ontario City Council tool: the. following action relative to the above subject: 1. To urge the Flood Control Engineer to arrange a joint meeting with all of the City Engineers in flood Control District Zone 1 at the earliest possible date; 2. Request that the proposed Benefit Assessment District include a provision to cr ^alit those who have already contributed to the construction of flood control faciliti.cs; 3. Urge the Flood Control District to work closely with the cities and through the Zone 1 Advisory Committee, Chambers of Commerce and other civic groups to develop a Benefit Assessment District for total flood protection; d. Urge the Flood Control District to construct water retention facilities as part of all regional projects in order to maximize ground water basin recharge; and S. Urge the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors not to levy an assessment until after it has been presented to the voters. JET addition, the Ontario City Council has reviewed Ontario's proposed storm drain pro- ject priority list. While the exact project designations and priority ranking have not been established, this list will be used by the City Engineer in preliminary discussions with the flood Control Engineer, for the pa:pose of establishing an assessment amount necessary to fund our "local" storm drain needs, estimated at $25 million. Ontario supports the concept of it Flood Control Benefit Assessment District and recognizes the n_ed for the construction of flood protection facilities. However, a major concern expro;;sed by 1.110 Ontario City Council was the tiding of the ballot for district formation. We :strongly urge the careful planning and preparation of this program and that the issue not ho presented to the voters until sufficient effort and energy have been expended to produce a program in which the voters can have confidence. 76 County Board of Supervisors July 7, 19SU Pave 2 A zone -wide proposal as opposed to a county -wide election would have the advantage of having the voters understand what facilities would he constructed and present a much smaller total dollar figure, thus not scaring the voters into a "no" vote. Sincerely, R. E. F:1 rno �aod Mayor CC: Mr. Di Pietro, San Bernardino County Flood Control Engineer Zone 1 Mayors Zone 1 Advisory Committee Zone I City Engineers -71 CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 16, 1980 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: Agreement for Extension of Services on General Plan with Sedway /Cooke ABSTRACT: Attached please find a copy of the agreement for extension of services with Sedway /Cooke. This extension has been necessitated by the problems incurred by Sedway /Cooke in meeting contract deadlines. The payment schedule has now been revised to provide for payments upon re- ceipt of certain tasks as described in the contract. We feel that with the clarifications included in the agreement and the revised payment schedule, that we will receive an adequate job from Sedway /Cooke in the timeframe delineated on the last page of the contract. The General Plan and DEIR will be ready to begin the public hearing process on October 1, 1980. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council direct the Mayor to execute the attached agreement and direct staff to forward copies to Sedway /Cooke for their execution. Res pectfuliy submitted, �thrY� -CEP JACK Direcftiry bf' Community Development' •� JL:BH:jk -7a AMENDMENT TO GENERAL PLAN PROJECT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as CITY and Sedway /Cooke, a California Corpora- tion, hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT, for professional services dated and effective October 1, 1979, is hereby amended in the following particulars only: The parties hereby agree: WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Consultant have entered into a contract to prepare a General Plan; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that amendment be made to such Gen- eral Plan Contract. NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED that the following changes are made to cover all remaining responsibilities of Consultant as follows. That Article II, Sections B.3, be added to the contract to read as follows 3. The Consultant shall prepare a screencheck draft Urban Design Element for submission to the City by July 25, 1980. This screencheck draft will be prepared in accordance with Tasks 3a5 through 3a10 of the revised Work Program, but will not address circulation and traffic. Within four weeks of receipt of materials submitted by the City pursuant to Section C.4, a revised screencheck draft reflecting these subjects shall be submitted to the City as part of the screencheck draft General Plan. 4. Within two weeks of receipt of materials submitted by the City pursu- ant to Section C.4, the Consultant shall submit a screenscheck draft Energy Element prepared in accordance with Tasks 31b13 through 31bl6 of the revised Work Program, (Note: This element requires land use as well as circula- tion inputs). 5. The Consultant shall prepare a report establishing an internal consis- tency administrative procedure in accordance with Task Sb for submission by July 25, 1980. 6. The Consultant shall prepare an Administrative Procedure for General Plan /Implementation System Consistency for submission by July 25, 1980. 7. Within four weeks of receipt of materials submitted by the City pur- suant to Section C.4, the Consultant shall submit a screencheck draft Gen- eral Plan and EIR to the City. The screencheck draft General Plan will consider City's comments on the screencheck draft Energy Element which are received within one week of submission. -7 3 B. The Consultant shall revise the screencheck drafts of the Urban Design and Energy Elements, and the General Plan and EIR to correct errors of fact, omissions of data and insufficient data. The Consultant will consider other comments provided by the City and may revise screencheck drafts to reflect these comments. As the author of the Land Use and Circulation Element, the City shall be responsible for the analyses and recommendations contained therein. The Consultant as author of the remaining General Plan Elements and DEIR shall be responsible for the analyses and recommendations contained therein. The Consultant shall submit the revised draft General Plan and DEIR to the City within ten days of receipt of the City's comments on the screen- check drafts. This submission shall include a technical report, prepared in accordance with Task 6D, on the compliance of the draft General Plan with applicable state laws. That Article II, Section C of the contract be amended in its entirety to read; C. Responsibility of City 1. The City shall be responsible for all liaison, coordination, and com- munication with all city agencies, staff, officials, and current or pre- vious consultants to the City, as well as with other involved agencies of other levels and jurisdictions, including but not limited to San Bernardino County, the Southern California Association of Governments and the State of California. 2. The City shall assume full responsibility for the preparation of the text and Land Use Plan Map and Circulation Plan Map for the Land Use and Cir- culation Elements. The City shall have the responsibility as it deems appropriate to ensure that the format of the text; graphics, and plans is consistent with the organization and format already established by the Consultant. 3. The City shall ensure the compatibility of the Land Use Plan with the Circulation Plan by testing the land use plan using the DKS citywide traffic model. The costs of DKS's services for this purpose will be paid by the Consultant up to the maximum of $8,248.50, the amount re- maining of the Consultant's total $10,000 General Plan /Industrial Area Plan budget for DKS services. The City will have the necessary Land Use inputs to DKS no later than July 28, 1780. 4. Subsequent to the testing of the Land Use Plan as described above, the City shall submit the revised Land Use and Circulation Plans, including text and graphics, and the results of DKS analysis to the Consultant. The materials submitted shall contain information at a level of detail, e.g., number of housing units by type of unit, acres of commercial and indus- trial uses by land use categories, number of students and schools, acres of parks, general location for all uses, and vehicle miles travelled in order for the Consultant to meet its responsibilities as specified in Article II, Section B. -2- -Ty S. The City shall review screencheck drafts of materials submitted by the Consultant for factual accuracy, omissions of data and insufficient data. The City may provide the Consultant with additional comments on these materials. That Article II, Section G of the contract be amended in its entirety to read as follows: Payment shall be made according to the following shcedule: 1. $9,700 per month for seven months, receipt of which is hereby acknow- ledged by the Consultant. 2. $14,550 payable within 15 days of the execution by City of this amend- ment to the general plan project contract. 3. $4,850 payable within 15 days of receipt by the City of the existing land use map, "1000" scale draft land use plan (presented to the CAC in May, 1980), and its tracing paper overlay. 4. $4,850 payable within 15 days of the receipt by the City of the Screen- check Urban Design Element, internal consistency procedure, and General Plan /Implementation Consistency Procedure. 5. $4,850 payable within 15 days of the receipt by the City of the work product specified in Artucle II, Section B.4 - Screencheck Energy Element. 6. $7,500 payable within 15 days of the receipt by the City of the work products specified in Article 11, Section B.7 - Screencheck Draft General Plan and EIR. 7. $7,500 payable within 15 days of the receipt by the City of the work products specified in Article II, Section B.8 - Revised Draft General Plan and EIR and Technical Report on Compliance with State Laws. That Article II, Section K of the contract be amended in its entirety as follows: K. Compensation, The City agrees to pay the Consultant for all services and materials rendered in the performance of the specified work scope as amended herein, a sum of not to exceed $112,000. However, for those services requested by the City that go beyond the scope of said agreement, Consultant shall be entitled to time and materials compen- sation billable at the Consultant's then standard billing rates. That the list of products or tasks in Task 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Re- fined Work Program (Appendix A) is amended in its entirety to read as follows: -3- 7 S� I . One camera -ready copy of the Draft General Plan and Draft General Plan EIR on the Sedway /Cooke letterhead, including a technical appendix, pro- fuse illustrations and final graphic and mapping materials necessary as components to the General Plan and EIR to make the documents complete. To enhance the quality of the reproduction of graphics and maps by the City's printer, they shall be submitted in camera - ready, unreduced form. Maps, including a Land -Use Plan map shall be submitted on mylars at "2000" scale with instructions for reducing to 11 x 17 format. 2. One camera -ready copy (black and white) of the "popular summary ". 3. One "1000" scale reproducible mylar or sepia, for City use, of the base map for Rancho cucamonga General Plan. 4. All maps and texts to be reproducible through Xerox or Diazo machine. 5. All maps in final approved form shall be on reproducible mylar or sepia for City use, with each print appropriately rendered in color, and specificiations for preparation of the maps noted. 6. A presentation of draft Plan Elements and draft EIR Materials pre- pared by Consultants with appropriate graphic material necessary, to a joint Planning Commission and City Council meeting held October 1, 1980, at the Forum Room of the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. That the Work Schedule for Certification and Genral Plan adoption is amended and the new schedule is as shown on attachment A to this modified agreement. In all other procedural respects, except as modified herein, the General Plan Agreement dated October 1, 1979, remains in full force and effect. Date: Approved as to Form and Content City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Mayor Attest: Paul Sedway or Thomas Cooke Principals, Sedway /Cooke ti'7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MEETING REGULAR MEETING L CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, July 16, 1980. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led in the pledge to the flag. Present: Councilmen James C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Art H. Bridge and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Also Present: City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Director of Com- munity Development, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; Director of Community Services, Bill Holley; City Planner, Barry Hogan and Senior Planner, Michael Vairin. Approval of Minutes: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the minutes of the June 26, 1980 Special Meeting and the July 2, 1980 regular meeting. Motion carried 5 -0. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Mayor Schlosser read the list of applicants for the Planning Commission vacancy created by the resignation of Laura Jones as follows: Wanda Dixon Dennis Stout Gary Kortepeter Bruce Chitiea Jeff King Arnold Anderson Bill Wieland James C. McGuire Jeff Hill Sharon Romero Larry Wolff City Clerk Wasserman distributed paper for voting a secret ballot to the Council. Each Councilman was to vote for one of the listed applicants. City Clerk Wasserman counted the ballots and relayed the results to Mayor Schlosser. Mayor Schlosser announced that Jeff King had been selected as the new Planning Commissioner by a majority vote of the Council. b. Mayor Schlosser announced that preliminary funding for a Rancho Cucamonga high school and elementary school had been approved by the State. C. Councilman Mikels announced he would be on vacation for the next two weeks. d. Mr. Wasserman requested that Item "j" be removed from the Consent Calendar and that "T.D.A. Non - Transit Claim Revision" be added as Item F under City Manager's Staff Reports. e. Mayor Schlosser called an Executive Session at 7:15 p.m. to discuss per- sonnel matters and pending litigation. Council reconvened at 7:30 p.m. with all members of the Council and staff present. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80 -7 -16 for $234,255.40 b. Parcel Map. No. 5684 Acceptance of Map The subject map is a subdivision of 19 acres into 6 lots located at the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald by Henry Reiter. The street improvements were installed under site approvals and there- fore, bonds are not required prior to final approval of the map. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AP "ROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5684 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5684) C. Parcel Map No. 5893 Acceptance of Map Parcel Map No. 5893 is a division of land on the north side of Victoria Avenue, 440 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue. The map was submitted by Robert F. Barton. Street improvements will be constructed or bonded before building permits are issued. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP. NO. 5893. (Tentative Parcel Map. No. 5893) d. Parcel Map. No. 5892 Acceptance of Map Parcel Map No. 5892 is for the division of a one acre lot into two lots at the southwest corner of Hellman and Hillside. The map was submitted by Cynthia Prescher, owner /subdivider. The street improvements were installed by the owner and recently accepted by Public Works Inspection Staff. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP. NO. 5892. (Tentative Parcel Map No. 5892) e. Bend -- Extension (REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION) The eimeF ,.c the ___, NAP is commitment f' a- --u '-g the s;".-.; ,:�er,�.,�eated- in- Ehe�greemen[ L"s- recommended -that - Quasi! approve a- 6- months tensien. f. Tract 9427: Release of bonds. Located on the north and south sides of Banyan Street between Hermosa and Haven. Owner: Lesny Development Labor and Material Bond (Road) $53,000 Labor and Material Bond (Water) $19,500 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer) $20,500 g. Tract 8884: Release of bonds. Located on the east and south sides of Red Hill Country Club Drive. Owner: Harnish, Morgan and Co. Labor and Material Bond (Sewer On -site) $ 6,500 Labor and Material Bond (Sewer Off- site)$21,000 Labor and Material Bond (Water) $21,000 h. Tract 9382: Release of bonds. Located on the Southeast corner of Baseline and Haven. Owner: Lesney /Wilshire Properties. Labor and Material Bond (Road) $79,000 i. Tract 9617: Release of bonds. Located on the west side of Hellman north of Arrow Route. Owner: M.J. Brock S Sons. Inc. Labor and Material Bond (Landscaping) $ 7,530 j• Reee,mendetien -Le- Adept-- £mp }eyment- AEreemen!- w #th -6ity- Reneger (REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION) The - conga }tent- whe- reeen! }y- eemp }eeed- the- 6ieyirpen #t #ee- 6 }enn #f£eeE #en Pien- ken- reeemmended -ehne- the-£ x! y- 6ean<#}- eenn #det- eppeeve }- el- en- ewp }ey- ment- agreement -wish- the-£ ity- HeneEeac-- }'he- prepeeed- eEreanenl ;- whieh -ie boned -on- the- }nLernet# eon}- £ }!y- Henegemeert- Aenee }ne #enia- £nip }eymeq!- 6n #de- ee- ehe- Hiey- Reneger. Reeemmendalien2-- }L- ie -reee, mended -! lint-! he- !(eyer- be- ealher#sed- ep -a #gq- ehe- ewp }eyment- egreee�enl -en- belie }f -ef- the -6 #ty. k. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License. 7 -11 Food Store, 6612 Carnelian Avenue for off sale beer S wine. 1. Request to re- establish previously authorized Associate Planner Position. One of the Planning Division's Assistant Planners resigned to accept another position in Northern California. This position was originally an Associate Planner classification but was reclassified to Assistant Planner to better reflect the performance of the individual in this position. With the Assistant Planner position now vacant, staff would recommend that the original Associate Planner position be re- established to better accommodate the Department's needs at this time. M. Set August 6, 1980 for public hearing for Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 80 -01. Condominium Conversion. n. Authorization for Director of Community Services to attend National Recre- ation and Parks Association Conference in Phoenix in October, 1980. 0. N.I.C.D. Request for Additional Funding Request by the National Institute for Community Development for an additional $1,120 to cover mandatory personnel deductions connected with Project Experanza. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to approve Consent Calendar with Items "e" and "j" removed for further discussion. Motion Carried 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to approve a six month bond extension (Item "e ") with stipulation that improvements also be installed within six months in accordance with staff recommendation. Motion carried 5 -0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4A. ZONE CHANGE 80 -07 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - C.N. BRUBAKER A request for a change of zone from R -1- 20,000 to R- 1- 10,000 or more restrictive zoning for property located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Amethyst Streets. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 113 for second reading. ORDINANCE NO. 113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1062- 401 -11 FROM R- 1- 20,000 to R- 1- 10,000 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF BANYAN AND AMETHYST STREETS. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. :lotion carried 5 -0. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance 113. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palombo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None 4B. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT AREA Proposed Ordinance to designate the area bounded by Eighth Street on the south, Arrow Route on the north, Milliken on the east and Haven Avenue on the west as a special impact zone where no increases in site drainage may be created. City Clerk Wasserman read title of ORDINANCE NO. 111 for second reading. ORDINANCE NO. 111 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL DRAINAGE IMPACT ZONE NORTH OF THE SANTA FE RAILROAD TO ARROW ROUTE BETWEEN HAVEN AND MILLIKEN AVENUES, AND REQUIRING DETAILED ENGINEERING STUDIES AND MITIGATION MEASURES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried 5 -0. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance 111. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palombo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None 4C. PROPOSED INCREASE FOR INDUSTRIAL STORM DRAIN FEE Proposal to adopt Ordinance No. 112 to increase storm drain fees in the area bounded by Deer Creek on the west, Day creek on the east, 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard on the north. Proposed fee - $4,600 /acre. At Mr. Wasserman's request, Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, gave a brief summary of Ordinance No. 112. Mr. Wasserman stated that a letter had been received from Harold R. Lovgren indicating that he felt assessment districts would be the best way to handle funding storm drain construction rather than increasing fees on new ccu- struction. (Copy of letter was distributed to all Councilmen prior to meeting). Mayor Schlosser indicated that he agreed with points raised in the letter; however, he pointed out that it would take a long time to establish an assessment district and something had to be done at this time. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 112 for second reading ORDINANCE N0, 112 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE INDUSTRIAL LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA, MAKING ORDINANCR 75 APPLICABLE THERETO, AND ESTABLISHING A DRAINAGE FEE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. Motion: Moved by Palombo and seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion carried 5 -0. Prior to opening the meeting for public hearing , there was considerable discussion by Council regarding equitable fee distribution east and west of Haven and the eventual formation of Assessment Districts. In reply to ine cities from Council regarding refunding fees if necessary when the assessment district is formed, Lloyd Hobbs stated that it would be credited against assessments, as would any facilities that had been constructed between now and the time the Assessment District was formed. Motion was made by Mikels and seconded by Palombo that a provision be included in the Ordinance stating that when the Assessment District is actually formed, the areas be further refined into two or more districts to more equitably distribute cost. Prior to voting on the motion, discussion continued and after further clarification, Councilman Mikels withdrew the motion. At this point, Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Mr. Harold R. Lovgren voiced his opposition to the Ordinance stating that he felt the cost should be spread out among all taxpayers and referred to his letter of July 14, 1980. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed by the Mayor Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Frost to approve Ordinance 112. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palombo, Frost, Schlosser and Mikels. NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Mikels stressed that cost assessments should be distributed equitably. 4D. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE 110 City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 110 for second reading. ORDINANCE NO. 110 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION AND DELEGATING ADMINISTRATION THEREOF TO THE CITY MANAGER. ;lotion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion carried 5 -0. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Frost to approve Ordinance 110. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palombo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None 4E. ON ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE INELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY THE CITY City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE N0. 66 -A for second reading. At Councilman Bridge's request Mr. Wasserman read a portion of the Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 66 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCM4ONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO. 66 PERTAINING TO THE INELI- GIBILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY THE CITY. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading. Motion carried 5 -0. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, public hearing was closed. :lotion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo to approve Ordinance No. 66 -A. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palombo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None 4F. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCES NOS. 14 and 18 City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 115 for second reading ORDINANCE NO. 115 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 14 AND ORDINANCE NO. 18. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried 5 -0. In reply to inquiries from Council, Mr. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney, stated that Ordinance No. 14 established regulations and licensing procedures for the keeping of dogs and Ordinance No. 18 established interim development review procedures and that both Ordinances had been superceded by subsequent Ordinances. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No. 115. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palumbo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None 4G. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF CITY ORDINANCES City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO 114 for second reading. ORDINANCE NO. 114 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING GENERAL PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND OTHER CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE, Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried 5 -0. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve Ordinance No. 114. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palumbo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None 4H. AN ORDINANCE SETTING UP GENERAL INTERPRETATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION OF CITY ORDINANCES City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 116 for second reading. ORDINANCE NO. 116 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR USE IN THE INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF ALL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, NOW EXISTING OR HEREAFTER ENACTED. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried 5 -0. The Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve Ordinance No. 116. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palombo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser NOES: None ABSENT: None 4I. POSTPONEMENT OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AS A CONDITION OF SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT - (REVISION TO ORDINANCE NOS 28 AND 58) The proposed Ordinances will allow the Council to postpone street improvements for developed parcels of a subdivision or under such other cases where con- struction would normally be required but is impractical at the current time. In all cases, a lien agreement will be required to insure future construction. Mr. Hobbs, City Engineer, reviewed the changes made in both Ordinances. In the discussion that followed, Councilman Mikels requested that the following portion of Ordinance No. 28 -A be deleted prior to second reading: "upon receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission" (Section 1, first paragraph, last sentence). Council concurred with Councilman Mikels recommen- dation. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 28 -A for first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 28 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTION (f) OF SECTION 2.12 OR ORDINANCE NO. 28 TO PROVIDE CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN A PERIOD OF NINE (9) MONTHS FOLLOWING THE RECORDATION OF A PARCEL MAP FOR EACH LOT UPON WHICH THERE EXISTS A BUILDING OR OTHER USABLE STRUCTURE AT THE TIME OF SUCH RECORDATION. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 28 -A. Motion carried 5 -0. The Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, public hearing was closed. Mayor set August 6, 1980 for second reading of Ordinance No. 28 -A City Clerk Wasserman read the title of ORDINANCE NO. 58 -B for first reading ORDINANCE NO. 58 -8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 58 TO PERMIT THE USE OF LIEN AGREEMENTS AS SECURITY FOR THE FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF OFF - SITE IMPROVF24ENTS Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Frost to waive furthLr reading. Motion Carried 5 -0. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. The Mayor set August 6, 1980 for second reading of Ordinance No, 58 -B 4S REVENUE SHARING - ENTITLEMENT 11 Mr Harry Empey. Finance Director, made a brief presentation regarding the Revenue Sharing Program. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to appropriate revenue sharing in its entirety to support the contract requirements of the Sheriff's Depart- ment. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palumbo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None Mayor Schlosser called a ten minute recess at 9 :00 p.m. The meeting resumed at 9:12 p.m. with all members of the Council and staff present. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 5A. TREE PRESERVATION Mike Vairin, Senior Planner, made a presentation regarding tree preservation which included a short slide program highlighting the written report. Mr. Vairin indicated that staff was seeking some direction from Council on policy options relative to tree preservation and the existing Ordinance. It was the consensus of Council that staff prepare a draft Ordinance incorporating the policy outlined in option 4 "Selective preservation, replacement and wind control" for the general review of the Advisory and Planning Commissions. 5B. AWARD OF "NORTH TOWN" STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Request to award contract for construction of street improvements to Robert Escudero, Inc. at a bid of $297,134.22 and authorize fund expenditure. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to award "North Town" Street Improvement project to Robert Escudero, Inc. at $297,134.22 plus a 10% con- tingency and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute contracts on their behalf. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palumbo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None 5C. APPROVAL OF CARNELIAN STREET REALIGNMENT AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTS Proposed that Council approve design contracts with Genge Consultants for the realignment of Carnelian Street between Foothill Blvd. and Baseline, and for the two phased landscaping of Carnelian from Foothill Blvd. to Hill- side Road. The Street Alignment contract is not to exceed $18,700.00. Phase I Landscape design $19,125.00, Phase II $23,625.00. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve execution of design contracts with Genge Consultants for the realignment and landscape improve- ments of Carnelian Street from Foothill Blvd. to Hillside Street. The Street Alignment Contract is not to exceed $18,700.00, Phase I landscape design $19,125.00 and Phase II $23,625.00. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palombo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None 5D. REPORT ON SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESS- MENT PROGRAM Mr. Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer, reported on the San Bernardino County Flood Control Benefit Assessment Program. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo that the City supports the basic concept of a Flood Control Benefit Assessment District but is opposed to the time schedule. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palombo, Mikels, Frostand Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None. Mr. Wasserman indicated that a letter would be drafted for the Mayor's signature indicating the Council's feelings. 5E. CONTRACT FOR EXTENSION OF SERVICES WITH SEDWAY /C.00KE Request by Sedway /Cooke to extend the time allocated to provide the City with a complete General Plan. There is no change in the originally budgeted amount, only in the time necessary for completion and the extent of the work provided by Sedway /Cooke, Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to approve the agreement for extension of services with Sedway /Cooke and direct the Mayor to execute said agreement. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palumbo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None Councilman Frost cemented that there should be a much better communication with the City's Advisory Committee. 5F. REVISED T.D.A. CLAIM FORM (ARTICLE 8) Mr. James Robinson, Assistant City Manager, reportedthat it was necessary to revise the T.D.A. Claim form which was previously submitted and approved. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to submit revised Transportation Development Act (TDA) Non Transit Claim Form to SANBAG in the amount of $492,851 for fiscal year 1980 -81. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Bridge, Palumbo, Mikels, Frost and Schlosser. NOES: None ABSENT: None. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Mr. Robert Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney, requested a policy decision from Council regarding rate increases for disposal companies to be included in the franchise agreement the City is preparing. It was the consensus of Council that all rate increases should be subject to Council approval. Shirley Ridenauer, 8361 Malachite, inquired about the number and names of the refuse companies serving the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the specific areas they served. Mr. Wasserman stated that at present more than one refuse company can serve a specific area but the City recommendations will mean that only one company will operate in each area. At this point, Mayor Schlosser called an executive session to discuss personnel matters. City Council adjourned to Executive Session at 10:45 P.M. 7. ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened from Executive Session at 11:45 p.m. Motion: `coved by Mikels, seconded by Frost to adjourn. Motion carried 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 11:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Glory 7(Oentara Acting Deputy City Clerk