HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/02/06 - Agenda Packet0
4
AGENDA
l ' - �_: ,
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Regular Meeting
Lion's Park Community Center
9161 Baseline
Rancho Cucamonga
February 6, 1980
AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE: All items submitted for the City Council agenda must .
be in writing. The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday
prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office
receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. PLEDGE TO FLAG
B. ROLL CALL: Mikels ,Palombo_.Schlosser ,Bridge _,Frost_
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 19, 1979 and January 16, 1980
• 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. Energy Symposium - Tuesday, February 19, 7:00 p.m., Neighborhood Center
b. Historical Preservation Commission - February 19, 7:00 p.m., Lions Com.
Center.
c. Advisory Commission - Thursday, Feb. 21, 6:30 p.m., Library Conference Room
d. League Planning Cann. Institute - February 27 -29, San Diego
e. 1980 Mayor's and Presidents' Pglicv Committee - Wednesday, February 13,
7:00 p.m., Ontario City Hall, 303 East B Street
f. "Election 80" Candidates Seminar - Saturday, February 23, 8:30 a.m, to
30 p.m., a ogg West, Cal Poly, Pomona. (Details available in Clk's Office)
g. Council
h. Staff
3. COMMISSION REPORTS
a. Advisory Commission
b. Historical Commission.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without
discussion. Any Council member, staff member, or interested party may
request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion.
a. Approval of Warrants: Register No. 80 -2 -6 - $326,625.82 1
•
City Council Agenda -2- February 6, 1980
. b. Release of Labor and Material Bonds
Tract 9036 - Located on the west side of Turner Avenue at McKinley Street
OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc.
521 North Mountain Avenue, Suite A
Upland, California 91786
Performance Bond (Road) $68,000
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $34,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water) $ 9,000
Labor & Material Bond (Sewer) $ 7,000
(The roads were accepted by City Council on May 3, 1978)
Tract 9074 - Located on the west side of Jasper Street at Lemon Avenue
OWNER: Lewis Homes of California
P. 0. Box 670
Upland, California 91786
Performance Bond (Road) $54,000
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $27,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water) $11,000
Labor & Material Bond (Sewer) $ 7,500
(The roads were accepted by the County on October 10, 1977)
Tract 9075 - Located on the east side of Sapphire Street at Lemon Avenue
OWNER: Lewis Homes of California
• P. 0. Box 670
Upland, California 91786
Performance Bond (Road) $72,000
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $36,000
(The roads were accepted by the County on October 10, 1977)
Tract 9080 - Located on the northeast corner of Jasper Street and Hillside Road
Owner: Griffin Development
P. 0. Box 488
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
Performance Bond (Road) $196,000
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $ 98,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water) $ 19,000
(The roads were accepted by the City Council on June 7, 1978 except
Vicara Street which has been offered for dedication as a future
street and a cash trust in the amount of $2,400 has been deposited
to guarantee the completion of the improvements.)
Tract 9083 - Located on the north side of Arrow Route west of Malachite Avenue
OWNER: Harold Heers
1450 East Cooley Drive
Colton, California 92324
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $45,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water) $13,500
Labor & Material Bond (Sewer) $10,500
(The roads were accepted by the County on July 5, 1978)
city Council Agenda -3- February 6, 1980
Tract 9083 -1 - Located on the west side of Malachite Avenue on Devon Street
OWNER: Harold Heers
• 1450 East Cooley Drive
Colton, California 92324
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $34,000
(The roads were accepted by the County on March 14, 1977)
Tract 9083 -3 - Located on the north side of Arrow Route at Malachite Avenue
OWNER: Clarence E. Minnerly
6151 West Century Boulevard, Suite 1104
Los Angeles, California 90045
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $56,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water) $16,000
Labor & Material Bond (Sewer) $14,500
(The roads were accepted by the City Council on October 4, 1978)
Tract 9109 - Located north of the Pacific Electric Railway between Ramona
Avenue and Hermosa Avenue
OWNER: Bob Jensen Builder, Inc.
226 West "E" Street
Ontario, California 91762
Performance Bond (Road) $140,000
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $ 70,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water) $ 19,000
• Labor & Material Bond (Sewer) $ 28,500
(The roads were accepted by the City Council on June 7, 1978)
Tract 9110 - Located on the north side of Banyan Street east of Sapphire Street
OWNER: Mark III Homes, Inc.
2950 Redhill Avenue
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Performance Bond (Road) $70,000
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $35,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water) $22,000
Labor & Material Bond (Sewer) $14,000
(The roads were accepted by the City Council on February 1, 1978)
Tract 9116 - Located on the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Jasper Street
OWNER: Gary G. Miller
23625 East Maple Springs Drive
Diamond Bar, California 91765
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $16,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water) $13,000
(The roads were accepted by the City Council on July 19, 1978)
Tract 9131 - Located on the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Jasper Street
OWNER: Vanguard Builders
9211 Archibald Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Labor & Material Bond (Road) $91,000
(The roads were accepted by the City Council on June 7, 1978)
City Council Agenda
-4- February 6, 1980
Tract 9150 -
Located on the northside of Jasper Street at
Whirlaway Street
.
OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc,
521 North Mountain Avenue, Suite A
Upland, California 91786
Performance Bond (Road)
$110,000
Labor & Material Bond (Road)
$ 55,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water)
(The roads were accepted by the City Council
$ 28,000
on March 15, 1978)
Tract 9153
- Located on the west side of Turner Avenue south of Effen Street
OWNER: R & J Investors
540 South Pasadena Avenue
Glendora, California 91740
Labor & Material Bond (Water)
$22,000
Labor & Material Bond (Sewer)
$16x500
Tract 9157
- Located on the east side of Carnelian south
of Base Line
OWNER: Kaufman and Broad Homes, Inc.
18902 Bardeen Way
Irvine, California 92715
Labor & Material Bond (Road)
$114,000
Labor & Material Bond (Water)
S 5B4O00
Labor & Material Bond (Sewer)
S 32,000
•
(The roads were accepted by City Council on
October 4, 1978)
Tract 9171
- Located on the west side of Amethyst Street
at Alta Loma Drive
OWNER: Shelly Investment, Inc. and
Pomona Service Company
17772 East 17th Street, #108
Tustin, California 92680
Performance Bond (Road)
$62,000
Labor & Material Bond (Road)
$31,000
(The roads were accepted by the County on June 20, 1977)
Tract 9187
- Located on the north side of San Bernardino
Road east of
Archibald Avenue
OVINER: Thompson Associates Development Company
P. 0. Box 338
Carlsbad, California 92008
Performance Bond (Road)
$110,000
Labor & Material Bond (Road)
$ 55,000
(The roads were accepted by the County on January 7, 1977)
- Tract 9194
- Located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue
OWNER: Arnold Anderson
520 North Euclid Avenue
`
Ontario, California 91764
Labor & Material Bond (Water)
$12,500
Labor & Material Bond (Sewer - on site)
$ 81500
i
Labor & Material Bond (Sewer - off site)
$ 6,000
s
•
•
x
City Council Agenda -5- February 6, 1980
Tract 9325 - Located on the north side of 19th Street between Sapphire
Street and Jasper Street
OWNER: Hughes Development
510 West
Citrus Edge
Glendora,
California 91740
Performance Bond
(Water - on site)
$93,000
Performance Bond
(Water - off site)
$33,000
Performance Bond
(Sewer - on site)
$80,000
Performance Bond
(Sewer - off site)
$ 91000
NOTE: The Cucamonga County Water Dist.
approved the
installation
of the sanitary sewer and water
systems on
January 8, 1980.
Tract 9377 - Located on the southeast corner of Monte Vista Street
and Hermosa Avenue
OWNER: Bob Jensen Building, Inc.
226 West "E" Street
Ontario, California 91762
Labor d Material Bond (Road) $76,000
Labor h Material Bond (Water) $22,500
Labor d Material Bond (Sewer - on site) $22,000
Labor 8 Material Bond (Sewer - off site)$ 7,000
NOTE: The roads were accepted by City Council on May 16, 1979.
Tract 9402 - Located on the south side of Lemon Avenue at Mayberry Avenue
OWNER: Olympus Pacific Corporation
P.O. Box 3490
Anaheim, California 92803
Performance Bond (Water - on site) $14,000
Performance Bond (Water - off site) $ 7,000
Performance Bond (Sewer - on site) $14,000
Performance Bond (Sewer - off site) $11,000
NOTE: The Cucamonga County Water District approved the
installation of the sanitary sewer and water systems
on December 19, 1979
Tract 9590- Located on the east side of Archibald Ave. south of Carrari St.
OWNER: Terrax Corporation
23480 Park Sorrento, Suite 213 -A
Calabases Park, California 91302
Performance Bond (Water) $31,000
NOTE: The Cucamonga County Water Dist. approved the install-
ation of the sanitary water system on January 18, 1980.
City Council Agenda -6- February 6, 1980
c. Authorization for City Manager and Mayor to attend the National
League of Cities Congressional City Conference in Washington, D.C.
•
On March 15 -18. This is an approved budgeted item.
d. Site Approval 79 -01 - Acceptance of Agreement and Bond
4
Performance and Labor A Material Improvement
Security Instrument $51,000
RESOLUTION No. 80 -10
5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR SITE APPROVAL NO. 79 -01
(Community Baptist Church)
e. Parcel No. 4 - Parcel Map 1366. Approving Improvement Agreement
6
and Improvement Security for Vivienda Street
Performance Bond (Road) $11,600 (Surety)
Labor 8 Material Bond (Road) $11,600 (Surety)
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -11
8
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
•
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR VIVIENDA STREET (Parcel Map 1366, Minor
Subdivision W77 -0517)
f. Approval of Cost and Maintenance Agreement for widening of the Santa
9
Fe Railroad crossing on Vineyard Avenue.
This Agreement covers the cost of construction of the crossing and
paving and future maintenance of both the paving and crossing gates.
Both of these costs will be shared equally between the City and
Railroad,
g. Request of Award of Design Agreement to M.P.R. not to exceed $2,200
15
for design of traffic signal installation for the intersection of
Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue. The Archibald Avenue and Fourth
Street signal is on the priority list of council approved traffic
signals.
h. Approval to advertise for bids on Baseline widening from Beryl to
19
Lion.
Plans have been completed for the widening of Baseline on the south
side between Beryl and Lion Streets. The estimated cost of construction
is $55,000.
Y
City Council Agenda -7- February 6, 1980
• i. Refer claim of Edgar H. Wallace of Wrightwood, California
to City Attorney for handling. 20
j. Approval of Amendment to Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement - Section
10.C, Seniority Rights. 31
At the meeting of the Omnitrans Board of Directors held on the 3rd
day of October, 1979, the Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement was
amended to consolidate the East End Division with the Metro Division,
under Sec. 104, for the purpose of seniority rights determinations.
This amendment must be approved by all agencies within Omnitrans.
k. Minor Subdivision 78 -0194 - Bond Extension Request . 36
The City Council has accepted bonds for security of street improve-
ment installation on December 20, 1978. The developer, Bowden &
Nicholas has requested a six (6) month extension on the improvement
agreement.
1. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Anthony B. D'Agnenica 38
and Bruce R. Harris, Pizza 'N Stuff, located at 9740 19th Street
for on -sale beer 8 wine.
• m. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Avo N. Beltekian, 39
Avo's Arco Station, located at 9533 Foothill Blvd. for off sale
beer and wine.
n. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Irvin E. Remy, 40
9704 -96 19th Street, for off sale general.
o. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Gilbert B. Rodriguez, 41
S/W corner Foothill d Vineyard for on sale general eating place.
p Geno's, located at13241e Foothill iBlvd, for on9 sale 0beer YBuwin 42
e
eating place.
q. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Anthony B. D'Agnenica, _ 3
Pizza N' Staff, located at 9740 19th Street, for on sale beer 8
wine eating place.
5. Public Hearings
A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79-05__- City of Rancho Cucamonga_ 44
An Ordinance establishing standards and review procedures for
Planned Community Developments.
At the January 16, 1980 meeting, the City Council reviewed and
approved the first reading of the Planned Community Ordinance.
►'1
LJ
1
City Council Agenda -8- February 6, 1980
i ORDINANCE NO. 94 (SECOND READING) 45
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 79 -05 ESTABLISHING
STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PLANNED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTS.
B. Appeal of Tree Removal Permit Issues for David Long. Report by 54
Jack Lam.
The City has received an appeal for an approved Tree Removal Permit
to remove twenty -three eucalyptus trees on the south side of Summit
Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue.
C. Ordinance No. 39 -A 58
An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 39 Pertaining to Traffic Control
Regulations was approved by Council for first reading at its meeting
January 16, 1980.
ORDINANCE NO. 39 -A (SECOND READING) 58
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ORD. NO. 39 PERTAINING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL
REGULATIONS.
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
A. Status Report on Cost Allocation Program. Consultant Doug Ayres -_
will be in attendance to present the status report.
B. Deannexation of Uninhabited Territor From Rancho Cucamonga To the 59
City of Ontario Lauren Wasserman — —
The City of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario have been negotiating to
deannex a small parcel from Rancho Cucamonga and annex the parcel
to the City of Ontario. The primary reason for the change on city
boundaries is that the property can best be served by the City of
Ontario.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council concur in
the distribution of property tax revenues in relation to proposed
LAFC Annexation No. 1921 by adopting Resolution No.80 -9.
RESOLUTION 80 -9 60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA AGREEING TO
THE APPORTIONMENT OF PROPERTY TAX IN ANNEXATION
No. 156
City Council Agenda -9- February 6, 1980
• C. Zone I Storm Drain Committee (Lloyd Hobbs) 64
It is recommended that the City Council support the concept of
exploring alternative funding mechanisms for the construction of
storm drains and to appoint a member of the Rancho Cucamonga
City Council to sit on a Committee to review the developed
alternatives.
D. Rural Roads - Street Development Standards for landlocked parcels. 65
ack Lam
E. Street Naming - Request by the Planning Commission for the City 74
Council to determine a process for street naming within the City —"
of Rancho Cucamonga. (Jack Lam)
F. Reveron si of Acrea a of Tract No. 9399 and Tract No. 9400 - North 75
Side of Banyan, West of Beryl Jack Lam
G. Request to Adopt Resolution No. 80 -8 Setting forth Compensation 78
or Election officials designated by —the—City Clerk
Lauren Wasserman
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -8 78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
• OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, SETTING THE COMPENSATION
FOR ELECTION OFFICIALS.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
8. NEW BUSINESS
a. Council
b. Audience
9. ADJOURNMENT
.:•
RC67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NARR O VEN N V E N D O R A M
0304
0309
0309
0309
0109
LI
4
C
R
IES
NT S
INC
NS W
S JOU "NAL CO
OY C
Y
IATES
TIES
CO
ENT S
ENT S
T
ISTRI
NT, A H
u
INC
CHOOL
DISTRI
C
R PLUMP
FRVICES
ERA SHO
NT L SA
C ASSOC
H
COR
T
WARR
DATE
NET
2, 200
927
5, 138
5,051
1,494
1r 500
2,
100,
4,
1,
38,
4,
5,
5,
6,
3
5,6
110
I,
2,
3, 7
5rl
1, 0
1
1,2
4,0
3
lr 1
1, 1
(?
It
8867
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
C.
WARR
k VEN
A V E N 0 0 R N A M E
03098
03099
03100
03101
03102
03103
03104
03105
03106
2465
VOIC
2575
2585
2595
2605
2613
2615
2650
CORNETT CO
VENDOR NO. 2575
CUCA -ONGA CO WATER GIST
CUCAMONGA MOLD INC
CUCAMONGA PRINTING
CYPRESS MAGNETICS
C F M ASSOCIATES
VKS ASSOCIATES
GAILY REPORT
t,
C,
03107
03108
03109
03110
03111
03112
03113
03114
03115
03116
03117
03118
03119
03120
03121
03122
2805
3175
3277
3300
4075
4085
4095
4133
4145
4150
4500
4600
4775
4790
4793
4P25
CiCT :PHONE
F ASTMAN INC
FLCO MFG CO INC
EMPEY, HARRY J
FERNANDEZ ELIZABETH
FERROMET INC
FIRESTONE INTL REAL EST
FOSECO INC
FREDERICK SALES INC
FRIEDMAN, DEE DE2
",EANN6S, SHIRLEY
GENERAL TELEPHONE CO
GRANT, JERRY R
GRETCHEN GOLDIE DESIGN
GRIFFIN OEVELCPMENT CO
HAVEN 8LCG MATERIALS
03123
03124
03125
03126
4900
4901
4995
5110
HOLLEY, WILLIAM L
HOLLI.Y, WM - PETTY CASH
HOBBS, LLOYD
IBM
J4�
03127 6
03130
03131
03132
5265
6118
6145
6175
INTERNATIONAL LOCAL SELF
JACK INN THEE FBOX1�3E152[C
JIMS MASCNRY INC
JOBS AVAILABLE
03133
6580
KAUFf /AN E BROAD HOMES
L
03134
03135
03136
6600
6615
6628
KING ENGINEERS, L 0
KNOTTS BERRY FARM
LA FOND, JEAN 8
03137
03138
03139
03140
6630
6640
6770
683C
LAM JACK
LA140 CO`,STRUCTION CC
LEWIS HOPES OF CA
LOGUE, SALLY
03141
03142
6850
6851
L A TIMES - E E SMITH
L A TIMES
03143
6860
LE SHISTS INC
03144
6870
LOS ANGELES TURF CLUB
03145
6875
LOWES POWER TOOLS
,JR
03146
7163
PAGNISON E MOEN INC
'i
03147
0:3148
7195
7200
PARTING JOHN L
MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE
03149
03150
7220
7290
"ATCHAM KAREN C
HC ALLY TER, NANCY
03151
03152
03153
03154
7293
7298
7299
7303
�!C ELENNEY F
E E MC GINfY 6 SON
MIKES WELDING SERV
MILES, FREDDIE 0
03155
7305
OILLCR, AILEEN
03156
03157
7375
7398
'ONAHAN, CLAUDIA
"GTOROLA 1'4C
03158
03159
03160
03161
03162
03163
03164
7399
7400
7508
7540
7580
7710
7732
MR 8 SWIMMING POOLS
MT SAN ANTONTO HISTORIA
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI
NEWMAN. KATHY
NUBANK INTFRNATIf'NAL IN
PAINT BUCKET INC
PANTAGES THEATER
03165
13166
03167
03168
03169
7737
7738
7777
7778
7817
PARKVR JEFF
PAULINLS SPORTSWEAR
PHILLIPS BRANDT R.EDOICK
,HILLIPS EQUIP RENTALS
PRESCHER, MONTF
03170
7820
PRIDE. COLOR PRESS
WARRANT
WARR
DATE
NET
4.05
748.00
22.50
95.41
'18.01
19.50
6.257.47
594.61
1:488.44
790.33
3.60
75.00
300.00
24.22
2.40
41.15
18.50
200.00
200.00
2,344.35
300.00
500.00
500.00
125.00
65.64
125.00
903.20
10.60
24.91
22.68
3.44
20.00
95.70
3r 113.56
9r 029.00 •
150.00
149.55
125.00
66.50
1,126.94
300.00
10.60
701.82
11.56
18.75
19.17
18.74
48.62
28.88
31.02
45.00
50.00
250.00
435.00
100.00
3.1711.56
9.00
31.00
135.00
100.00
7,034 66 •
2.40
109.91
68.45
21.45
C�
RC67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NARR M VEN If V E N 0 0 R N A M E
HARR
DATE
-�TI
NET
13.40
31.75
500.00
23.70
1,623.00
75.00
76.00
116.91
1.12
8.10
2.40
9,700.00
60.00
250.00
1,422.31
46,166.49
705.21
341.18
65.66
1.78
1r 097.44
1r 106.08
8,604.00
6.36
158.40
45.00
516.32
20.00
157.94
165.00
100.00
302.08
12.50
326,625.82
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1980
TO: City Council & City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: SITE APPROVAL 79 -01 - ACCEPTANCE OF AGREEMENT AND BOND
The subject site approval is for the Community Baptist Church located on the
northwest corner of Beryl Street and 19th Street.
The conditions of approval for the development of the church are to install
street improvements on 19th Street. At the request of the church, we have
agreed to accept bonds as security for installation of street improvements,
at this time.
The attached resolution is for the acceptance of the agreement and security
submitted by the developer. It has been determined that the amounts and
forms are sufficient in nature to replace the needed construction.
• Performance and Labor & Material Improvement
Security Instrument $ 51,000
CJ
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and accept the agreement and security
on behalf of the City.
R spectfully s mitted,
*�OY ubbs
Cit Engineer
LBH:deb
4
• RESOLUTION NO. 80 -10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR SITE APPROVAL NO. 79 -01
(COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed
on January 18, 1980, by the Conservative Baptist Credit Union, lender,
by the Conservative Baptist Association of Southern California, as
developer, for the improvement of public right of way adjacent to the
real property specifically described therein, and generally located on
the northwest corner of Beryl Street and Nineteenth Street; and,
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in
said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred
to as Site Approval No. 79 -01; and,
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied
by goad and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement;
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvment Agreement and said
improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ayor
ATTEST:
City c erT k --
E
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1960
T0: City Council E City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR VIVIENDA STREET
The owner of Parcel No. 4 of Parcel Map 1366 has approached the City concerning
the development of residences on Vivienda Street.
The street is north of Hillside Road and extends west of Haven for approximately
600 feet. The City has worked closely with the adjacent property owners fronting
on this street. We have prepared documents for dedication to extend Vivenda
westerly and eliminate the existing dedication of a cul -de -sac. Mr. Smits has
made the needed dedications and has presented the City with securities for the
installation of street improvements as a condition of obtaining a building permit.
Performance Bond (Road) $ 11,660.00 (Surety)
Labor b Material Bond (Road) $ 11,660.00 (Surety)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting
the securities offered by Mr. Smits. Also, to direct the Mayor and City Clerk
to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Respectfully su mitted,
Yr/
/ G .'
oy B: ubbs
City Engineer
LSH:deb
sC-'
N
PARC MAP NO. 1S,#6 10<I..I. Lry <Ix,•.,
IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO onr+nlo. [wlxam.
SWFIIG S S RKV OF t "N 1/1 V 101 10 6 FLF 6 SCNOSSLIEM °90IVISIN AS VECCIAEO
IM KC< 11 PAM 15. KCM O< Lx K"WIN @rtl.
CILIFO¢4IL
SUIIVCYOIYS CEETIII"Tt
CWrytt W"EYOWS CENTIFICSTC
IlW rwl wrr•N I•rr wy•uw1M.r •r ••rrl ywr lr.N
tlnlrlu Anrw.l lr�'rjU! rr •I I1A.
ynr n sxwr� nU W rru��4 N Ur 1WIn•M Y hl rl
Ir �A...Ir Iru IwIM 119f rl LYV•r
Iw.•1 rl •Inr aY[ a IrYW. IYI, I I.IrF rNNt Ult NI wnulw•
W hl.
N rl•e•L SYI.1� wl lrrl O•..'.n hn ti� AIM nU.
[yr + fn. 4nu S•vllr
N I.•..
0
X[ -�- . u•.Ir
�.P"a •u.....Nr/
TfY!'
�
1
I
1
V
rAPM AIM S wr
r.aa Ip E 4
MISOEI N0. i
YT
K.
s In.N rS'
i vnloolE ^.• � q%y,;.`aa
Stll[R q
AsOQ'
TfY!'
�
V
rAPM AIM S wr
r.aa Ip E 4
MISOEI N0. i
YT
i
...ru rotr
bl
\
•
a
I.
,Y
Mnl.•/
•OW
�
1
S 0I E S
I FW Stqutst W
A•.ry.l rn Yrw n Inr rwurlli+N m11rN nnr
y 1<TOIL <xtU1S . -
w n T Y• W E u nwr n r r lrrrun
Ory Jys/ {� Hll
LYrrnM IrU 1/. Ir•r /I, hrrr N Im
4nu, glllunlr.
Al Il�li Ir, M. ry
0. Ln•rM nti0 Iw r rM.
M I L OED r1
of FMN. hr,H
I
0 Irlum nl 1• Lw Inr, urrr L 1
4.1141:11 p C Wl
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -11
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR VIVIENDA STREET (Parcel Map
1366, Minor Subdivision W77 -0517)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed
on January 29, 1980, by Peter W. Smits, as developer, for the improvement
of public right of way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on Vivienda Street; and,
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in
said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred
to as Vivienda Street; and,
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient improvement security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said
improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
• hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980.
AYES:
ATTEST:
f •
NOES:
ABSENT:
City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1980
TO: City Council b City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: COST AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR WIDENING OF THE
SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING ON VINEYARD AVENUE
As a part of the widening and resurfacing of Vineyard Avenue, previously
approved as a Federal Aid Urban project and currently under design jointly
by Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga, the crossing for the main line of the
A.T. b S.F. Railroad must be widened and improved. The attached agreement,
submitted for your approval, covers the cost of construction of the crossing
paving and future maintenance of both the paving and crossing gates. Both
of these costs will be shared equally by the City and the railroad. The
City's share of construction is estimated at $14,092.
Construction of the new crossing gates is not a part of this agreement.
The gates will be 90% federally funded and will be designed at a later date
• by the railroad under a separate agreement.
That the City Council approve the attached Cost Maintenance Agreement and
authorize the Mayor's signature thereon.
Respectfully su itted,
L oy c6. Hu
W s ��
Ci Engineer
LBH:deb
I
The Atchison,Tope!ia and Santa Fe Railway Company
R Slnlu F[Wn 1111e1C.'WY-
One Santa Fe Plata. 5200 East Shed. Sneer. Los Angela, California 90040
213/267 -5404 .
December 21, 1979
File: 231.3(2 -90.7)
Vineyard Avenue
Mr. Lloyd B. Hobbs
City Engineer, Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Dear Mr. Hubbs
Attached are duplicate originals of proposed cost and maintenance agree-
ment to cover work to be performed by Santa Fe forces in connection with
the proposed widening of Vineyard Avenue at the above - referenced grade
crossing of Santa Fe, covered by your letter dated October 2, 1979.
As is indicated within the agreement, the proposed additional crossing
gates and rearrangement of the existing gates will be covered under the
Federal Funding Program. Cost figures will be submitted to the Sacramento
office of Caltrans with copy to you for your information.
Providing the agreement is satisfactory, please have both originals •
executed and return for completion by Santa Fe, after which your original
will be returned for your file.
With return of the documents, please also furnish certified copy of
Resolution or minute excerpt authorizing the signatory for completion of
our file.
Very truly yours,
I
"t . .;sir. el
N. W. Toliver,
Assistant General Manager
Engineering
Attachments
cc; Public Utilities Commission
State of California
107 South Broadway
Los Angeles, CA 90012
16
CITY CTI
C067M1;Or,11 t L41`C.VCA D 1Pi,A
r. , y Z 13/9
AM
7181911D11111211121,7t41S A
Sdnla Fe C.- iainal
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
day of , 19_, by and between THE
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, a
Delaware Corporation, hereinafter designated "Santa
Fe ", and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a political
subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter
designated "City ".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, City proposes to widen and improve VINEYARD AVENUE to a
paved width of 64 feet on each side of and including the crossing of
Santa Fe's Second District main track, designated as Cressing No.
2 -98.7, and further identified as AAR /DOT No. 026 - 165 -X, and
WHEREAS, the installation of median crossing gates and upgrading of
existing gate type signals is to be made concurrently with said program
pursuant to a State Department of Transportation Service Contract under
the Federal Grade Crossing Improvement Program, and;
WHEREAS, the parties hereto are in accord as to said program and
. are in accord as to the maintenance of said area subsequent to construc-
tion, and Santa Fe is willing that City, or City's contractor, do all
work under said program except preparation of Santa Fe's track, includ-
ing area to receive additional roadway width, install full depth timber
planking and rearrangement of communication pole line facilities. The
median islands are not a part of the Santa Fe work.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED:
1. City, or City's Contractor, will do all work under said
proposal, except that work hereinafter specified to be done by
Santa Fe.
2. City, or City's Contractor, will comply with Santa Fe's rules
and regulations and instructions of Santa Fe's representatives in
relation to proper manner of protecting Santa Fe's track and traffic
moving thereon, at or in the vicinity of the work during the period of
construction of said improvement, and shall perform their work in a
manner satisfactory to Santa Fe or its designated representatives. and
•
at such times as shall not endanger or interfere with safe and timely .
operation of Santa Fe's track and other facilities.
3. Santa Fe will rearrange communication pole line, prepare the
track for additional roadway width and place full depth timber crossing
panels to accommodate a total roadway width of 64 feet,
4. Work specified to be done in above Paragraph 3 by Santa Fe
shall be done as soon as practicable, considering completion of said
program, availability of materials and manpower, and in consideration
thereof City will pay to Santa Fe the actual total cost of said timber
crossing panels, less the cost of timer planking which Santa Fe would
normally install. City's adjusted cost of said timber crossing panels
and pole line facilities is presently estimated by Santa Fe to be
FOURTEEN THOUSAND NINETY TWO ($14,092) DOLLARS.
5. Santa Fe shall submit to City a bill for eighty percent (80 %)
of the above estimated cost upon completion of work contemplated, which
bill City agrees to pay promptly. City shall pay the actual cost upon
completion of audit, less credit for the sum previously paid.
6. After installation of said crossing warning devices has been •
completed Santa Fe shall physically maintain them as long as they
remain in place. Irrespective of the source of construction funds and
the resulting apportionment of the cost of constructing crossing
warning devices, the cost of maintaining said crossing devices shall be
borne and paid fifty percent (50X) by Santa Fe and fifty percent (50%)
by City. City's liability for such maintenance costs shall be limited
to such funds as are set aside for allocation by State of California
Public Utilities Commission.
7. Santa Fe will at its expense maintain that portion of the
crossing lying between rails of the track and for two feet outside
thereof.
8. City will at its expense maintain any street improvement within
said crossing other than specified to be maintained by Santa Fe in
above Paragraph 7.
9. That
all work covered by this agreement
shall conform to
requirements
of the Public Utilities Commission
of the State of Calif-
ornia.
•
• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF Rancho Cucamonga has caused these
presents to be executed and attested by its duly qualified and author-
ized officials pursuant to authority regularly granted them by its City
Council and THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY has exe-
cuted these presents both as of the day and year first above vritten.
3/111
P.PPRD`JED: �'
l'im�. =.i :i••:ci ai ^I:a c:•J Santa Fe
• Reid::v Cj:n.:ar.y
j/ ' y
A!:Glnpy .•
THE ATCHISON. TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Its
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By N
Ci y
Ita
3
13
Re AIdhon. Tw'i,;
ESTIMATE OF COST TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCaMONGA TO HIDEN VINEYARD AVE.
CROSSING 2 -98.7, CUCA:MONGA, CALIFORNIA.
DESCRIPTION
QUAN
UN1 TS
LABOR
MATL OTHER
TOTAL
ENGINEERING (FIELD)
275
-- -- - - - --
275
ENGINEERING (COMM.)
120
- - -- - - --
120
COMMUNICATION (POLE LINE)
225
L75 - - --
400
RENEW TIES WITH 9'
39
EA
390
546 - --
936
PLACE FULL DEPTH PLANKING
64
2.F.
1216
4800 ----
6016
RESURFACE TRACK
176
't.F.
352
175 - --
527
WORK TRAIN
350
--- - - --
350
INSURANCE
350
-- - --
350
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
--
- - -- 400
400
11A30LING
1424
- - -- - --
1424
LABOR ADDITIVE
1721
- - -- - - - --
1721
SUBSISTENCE
292
- - -- - --
292
SUB -TOTAL
CONTINGENCIES
TOTAL COST TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCx%ONGA
OFFICE OF AGM -ENGR.
LOS ANGELES, CA.
November 5, 1979
231.3(2 -98.7)
2166
14
6715 5696
400 12,811
1,281
$14,092
E
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1980
TO: City Council 8 City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: DESIGN OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION FOR THE INTERSECTION
OF FOURTH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE
The Council last year approved a basic traffic signal priority list consisting
of about 13 locations. The first signals on this list, those at Haven Avenue
and Amber Lane, Archibald Avenue and Church Street, and Base Line Road and
Hellman Avenue are now under construction or awarded. The fourth location on
the priority list, Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street, continues to experience
severe traffic congestion during peak hours and considerable traffic delay
during most hours of the day.
The City of Ontario agrees with the need for this signal and is now willing to
finance its half of the installation and design. It has requested Rancho
Cucamonga to be the lead agency in charge of preparation of plans and specifi-
cations and award of the contract. An agreement to this effect is now in the
process of approval by Ontario and will be brought before you for approval
shortly. A proposal has been received from the firm of MPA, Inc. for design
of the signal for a cost not to exceed $2,200.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve award of the design of this signal to the firm
MPA, Inc. for a cost not to exceed $2,200.00.
Respectfully submitted,
(J�' ✓� J
L1 ubbs
Ci Engineer
LBH:deb
n
15
LJ
E
E
1
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
DESIGN AND PREPARATION OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS
AT
ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND FOURTH STREET
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1980
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "City ", and Mohle, Perry & Associates, Consulting Civil
Engineers, with a place of business at 2565 East Chapman Avenue, Suite 124,
Fullerton, California, 92631, hereinafter referred to as "Engineer ".
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, City has need for engineering services, consisting of
the preparation of improvement plans, specifications, and estimates for
traffic signal designs to be constructed at the intersection of Archibald
Avenue and Fourth Street, hereinafter referred to as "Project ", and
WHEREAS, it is beneficial to City to have under contract an
engineering firm which can immediately perform required services for City
for a predetermined not to exceed fee; and,
WHEREAS, Engineer has specialized knowledge, training and
experience in municipal engineering as well as in traffic signal design
and construction; and
WHEREAS, Engineer desires to perform engineering services for
City under contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it mutually agreed as follows;
I. Engineer, when authorized, shall perform professional civil
engineering services in conjunction with the aforementioned project as
follows:
TASK A. Orientation Meeting with City
1. Review of project scope.
2. Obtain from City and the City of Ontario,
a. Pertinent design criteria for traffic signal design;
b. Available "as- built" plans, utility information, plan
sheets and signal warrant data.
TASK B. Preliminary Report
Engineer shall prepare and submit a letter summarizing traffic
movement data, traffic equipment options, estimates and phase
sequencing to City and to the City of Ontario for approval.
TASK C. Complete the Improvement Plans for the project
1. Development of the plans at V =20' scale, a bid proposal
and special provisions of the specifications utilizing the
current edition of Caltrans Specifications. Plans shall
include intersection striping. Street improvements will
not be involved in this project.
2. Preparation of detailed estimates of quantities and
construction costs prior to advertising for competitive
bids.
3. Plans and specifications shall be suitable for approval by
City and the City of Ontario.
4. Furnish original plans, specifications and bidding forms to
city.
TASK 0. Bid Analysis
Engineer shall analyze bids and make recommendation on award of
contract.
TASK E. Construction Phase Services
Engineer shall be available for consultation during the
construction phase and make recommendations on contract change
orders.
II. City shall provide engineer with assistance in the preparation
of the plans, specifications and estimates for project by providing the
following:
A. Copies of all improvement plans, atlas sheets or other
drawings within project limits as required.
B. Location of all subsurface improvements as may be available.
C. Plan checking.
D. City standard sheets if available.
E. City shall advertise for bids and perform construction
management and inspection services.
III. City shall reimbursement engineer for services performed based
on time and material with a not to exceed fee of two thousand two hundred
dollars ($2,200) for Tasks A, B, C, and D. Task E shall be paid on a time
and material basis in accordance with the following formula and a mileage
rate of twenty -one cents (214) per mile:
Actual salary x 2.5
City shall pay the engineer the prorata share of the not to exceed fee of
work completed as determined by the City upon billing once each month at a
regular City Council meeting.
17
E
n
U
1J
City shall have the right to audit the statement and remove from payment
any item with which City is in disagreement, which item shall be thereafter
• reviewed with the engineer. After full review, City shall make the final
decision.
Engineer shall begin the work to be performed within five (5) days after
mailing by City to engineer of a Notice to Proceed and shall diligently
prosecute same to completion. Engineer shall submit plans to City within
30 calendar days.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Engineer have executed this agreement
as of the date first above written.
City Clerk
0
I�
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Mohle, Perry d Associates
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1980
TO; City Council 6 City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS ON
BASE LINE WIDENING FROM BERYL TO LION
Plans have been completed for the widening of Base Line on the south side
between Beryl and Lion Streets. The estimated cost of construction is
$55,000. This project will be followed shortly with the reconstruction of
Base Line from Agate to Hellman Avenue. The reconstruction is primarily FAU
funded.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council approve advertisement of widening of the south side of Base
Line from Beryl to Lion Street.
. Respectfully submitted,
. �s,�
oyd B. Hubbs
,ty Engineer
LBH:deb
I?
I
I
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
• TO PERSON OR PROPERTY
TO: CITY OFi.{J3- ANeM-ES' Upland, California and to the County
of Claimant
Business
CITY Of RANC(;0 CUCAMONGA
ADMiINISTRATICY
JAN 31 i9 100
All
718191101111121112(314(5 6
CAM, Q
Age of Claimant (it natural person)
61
Home Telephone Number
(714) 981 -3192
Business Telephone Number
Chaffey College 5885 Haven Alta Loma CA 91701 1 (714) 987 -1737
Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim:
POLLOCK and POLLOCK, Attorneys at Law
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1808, Los Angeles, California 90067
How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars.
Was driving a motor vehicle north on Grove Avenue and when about 300 feet
north of Avenda Vejar in San Bernardino County was struck by a railroad
train. More details of the accident are set forth in the traffic collision
report attached hereto and made part hereof.
1GE or INJURY occur? Give cull parneula
20, 1979, about 10:55 A.M.
Where slid DASIAGE or INJURY "cur? Descnbe fully, and locate on diagram an reverse side of this sheet, where appropriate, give
street names and address and measurements from landmarks:
At railroad crossing on Grove Avenue, located approximately 300 feet north
of Avenda Vejar, San Bernardino County. See traffic accident report
attached hereto.
What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or
damage, if known:
Negligent maintenance of railroad crossing at the aforementioned location and
negligently failing to give proper warnings and to have proper safeguards
at and near said crossing. Railroad company was also neglient in the
operation of its train and said railroad crossing and its facilities.
What DAMAGE or INJURIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed:
Among other injuries, Claimant sustained cerebral concussion, rib injuries,
knee and leg injuries, cervical and thoracic sprains.
What AMOUNT do you claim on account of each item of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this claim, giving basis of
eomput.timi:
General damages, $50,000, plus medical expense of $2,000 to date plus future
medical expenses; loss of earnings of about $1,000 to date, plus future
loss of earnings; propert damage to jeep vehicle total loss about $2,000
Dl us storaa anri rr,.ing s1 s nn.
6he- i�i'HAMPLAMd!!N�ar 4ar-m irnwws•wwtada.re+.w « etw wM twe: ^lusw,srkmwgergtwwg•Oasw.W
ti$ygnature of Claimant or person filing on Typed Name: EDWARD I, POLLOCK,
!; be �igiving rei 'onship t9 Claimant: POLLOCK and POLLOCK Aty.
By: d-- �i <..._i '7� If jam— LosBAnggeeles, CalifooZnia 91067
Attorney for Claimant Edoar H. Wallace DATED: danuarv� RO
P
nlGh 0. .— GA�NC.,.'�.- -_ -_
. ............ �...........
v� e
;f•
•��J t>C"t'� .:t 1�4t�i: _. �.i. L.��C7 G�'9.— �C.�.� _ .
�
I.EO 5(':. :: u..�♦ .f
E.rC.•Ofi ..� _ �� —� I
At
— ��Z43Z
:
�, C.P i i�c .tea o ❑ 0 , f= oo 0
{�
i
C/r
en-
.Ere..
I
/� I
pA G % i...
i : :
•. •..e.�.
.: . ..11� �.. o.
......•..
c
. °.
°
—
,.. ..... ... ..—
Fes.
—
.
c
�..
—
ir......
c.
-.. "
tAFFIC COLLISION RE! )R .
C�1C3r�tn.vj ..�...�..
,`. _...
❑/�
,-
ti
-iI
�P.SS
•
................ ....
�� .
<.
.
..... ... «.
o. .❑.
❑_, :`a.
❑. .o.
e
❑ ❑
❑
❑ ❑
1 ❑ n ❑
�--yy
qee
O
.naccu.neeus
•
,..
NoT _o
_S _MI'anly
30 &1
re
0
E
U
cl-
3
E
1121
S Ir1h '
dr, s..t
• 1 VI �T�C:
I�l..
23� _.
J
I
1-26xr, Ill—LO-62-11
I
-' Ao
... 2 n 7,-? ze
/0 a -z-37
-7 /l
-i
•.CN71 w..0 • w.f A wL[ v,..S1l
ryl
yl
1T41CO ISC.SIC.
1
I 1
11 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I i I 1 I 1' 1 1 IMI
11 I ICI
I
Q14, 14w qy
;
Sr,j
\
�
l
nsr� -• OI
.L
oLS HTr+ =.mil
•
,..
NoT _o
_S _MI'anly
30 &1
re
0
E
U
cl-
3
E
1121
S Ir1h '
dr, s..t
• 1 VI �T�C:
I�l..
23� _.
J
r {nwICnK10nIJ
nwwTry eeonnnu. non Twwr ne
'7 S4 rIl [..CMTAL Tn.IIIC CO LLIf 10N
ncrow� Ia_..........y
7 oTNCw:
1055 13616 M0573
Grove Avenue
Cucamonga, San Bernardino
1003747 -11 5
2
At approximately 1115 hours, 10-20- 79 , 1 responded o the Location or rova
-;:e ;,ate -a,- l•.e- Sexttae�..- - .,,,�P>a -.a;^ n�i l-tead tract S, •ah�ch �= 3usf to the u^.
of Avenida Vejar to a traffic collision.
- Hpan -arr iv t�rl -at the Beene, : -�- was -o> ' =- a-- laeomot.
vehicle. The vehicle being at its point of rest-off the tracks and to the
South of the impact area. - Checking for the injured subject, it was round
Investigation revealed that the subject had been transported to a ospita ,
-by-2--w �
POINT OF IMPACT:
The point of impact was determined by a piece of the wrecked vehicle,
belonging to P1, lying in the roadway of Grove as it crossed the railway
__ �::S�f'- 't�Svstisciiri -dpi czCa —i - Ha5— F1eterm. y„ed —.th mss•° "•�
was 12 feet from the East curb of Grove Avenue and approximately 306 feet
from the North prolongation of the curb ofAven Ve ar.
POI14T OF REST:
- the- pvxrrt -o£ - -r _ s t -ter€ " Lhe�[eh�ele- was --2 �.eeb -to - t-he -- €.isk- o�- t:+a-= ast- curS--
of Grove Avenue and approximately 45 feet to the South of the railway tracks.
"-- VE+i-FCi.E -0AMAGF,: -- —
The vehicle damage to P1 vehicle 5el`ng a C� —, Jeep, Wagoneer, License
-- WY ?854y- «as -es t•imated-- to -be- comp }et¢ly -- totaled -. 4't�engiae- was. -asu
with the impact area beinq__the left side of the vehicle at the location of
the engine. Also the drivers door was also disEoYted an�oou not ne open= -
-ed. - Along -- the -left -side7- t-could-be-.seen that - the'- lucomoti�c. -- had- pusk:e�' -the
vehicle away as it darted from the impact and that the windows of the
left side of the vehicle were tiroken aand also the- %ft`rear a a crux e
- area - which - was - -ca �d-vy- the -fii n ai- corttac t -wi t- h- the - loco,�ot ive - as- it -waa --
pushed away through the air to its final resting place.
- feGaMOP IVE- DP!wiGE:
The only damage Co the locomotive, as observed, was tit rheTi and-cail:... --
- izvrTthe- ight - side- to-tiie-top- part -of the locomotive --had -been 4orw - away -- -
At the time of the investigation, it had been fixed by the engineer with
- •sire, this the .hens an -.,_ r+,.ht ..''.c, fIc boteom step had been crushed;"
k..:G. Mar`tin,. Ceputy 19573 '10. .,. ... • .
i
;UPPL AU A,'- -
�. - -10 '-20 79 1055 3616 MO
•IV (CONr:N V wf:OX rNwfflG
•e.r�(w.(nrwc rwwrr:c cou.(wr• Grove Avenue
w(rowr le. •.•...•.+•1
Rancho an
Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
S
area
a area away
was northbound on
- Gct3id and• -a ...•he _dw y in
I did not see or hear a train coming to the roadway in front of me, the
was not observed to be workiniatthamlo�f - traarrrwaacs in- the -as
gnal
eyr ame�e -oorrt aet-:: ham.
location." The victim was asked with reference to the state of his visibi l-s
from theinterior of the vehicle, he stated that he haad_hie_`3dsd�wo =Ph=s•
— wor- iei++gr�h� -Ehe �le€rest���, -gut -- the -v isib i-1x tY--S+ _ .
-1-asked what his condition wasat the present time, he stated that he had
�d-aee sa�� *- =� the - head- a.,,.�.�� -- ='ace- ration -to-- the- icrtee- calrarca- oE-- 4ti"r "lef =.
leg also abrasions to his abdomen and chest.
-'-e- bedside- of- the--v'tctia , --
it was stated by the doctor that he suspected possibl_._internal ce, that
j apait from the visible lzcerations and there migceaamVn=adr�ez �-
- {,hey -� +ere -awai tinng- tbL-test-resn its _ef- the -sus pe
A —
... _ a oberC- 'f`REGGEY"P- ,- °f-ioc ° m°tive- tie: - 3420 - stated, °- I -warat t—
The eng
bound on the rail and observed a driver o_f_a_.vehicle,._failed_to stop_at _t,.e
rail signal, that were cgeratir.a. prior to coming into the road••oa;� Erom t`.e
.,.
- West, - I-had - sounded- my- trs'iI ....- z ,..,;.
a ractice when e.n.terinc ny _.a__..._ _•, .v Lr -=
--For warning sub;�c.s •..- .. r ,•as r,oinq -vary slcx, c: -, -
- prior- to-.going into _ _ _ :ia::, -
i:. •I �:ce. 'she right front side,
n3tely 15 threw it from the
G. Martin, Deputy
,-+:131022•/
vltRess- }�j�� -LCLL j• L
2 caFS behind the vehicle that was involved with the train. From where
I was, S could not see the wig -wag lights, although I could see the arm
going- back -and- forth -=L;,f ...ar- i3rat- trarinralved -with- the-- la3ceometave- d
---- I ...;.h rho train. The riqht front of the train
hit him. I did not notice the brazes on t„c LL O..•, �••- - - - --- - --
-- seen-- to - -be- going - very -f a9 t: —Afters -the- accident- occurzdr-; 9ot-out and--- -
assisted the driver of the vehicle, he was ble =ding very bad, so =y wife
an I, attempted to get him out of the rivers 3oor. -fie door was 7amcned - --
short ; -going -to- h4*e -otrhe r-- s -ide; goital. jussideounddled- h-irnert� and -took-
�._ uosoital. just around the corner."
— ilitness -No .- {-.--duiia -LUND-,- stated -that- she - has -to- oncura-with- ever-y-thi
her husband said, but_like to state further that the rain. was-
heavy at the time of the accodent and eue to the cond'I tionns F t,ie neat
-- artd-the- type-of--device - at -ti+e- railroad-, --it- was - very -- hard -to- see- the-wic
wag sig nal operating. The light that was in the sign, was not visible
her, as she and her husband were approaching the - Iocation.
to
At this time the statements were concluded*
g.
G. Martin,• Deputy --I 10573 110-2 -- - .-._..1-
7
E
10.,,20 „ry 11055 1 so16 I a 1I
nwwwowcconnnw no «r nr nc
i e.. n.........
••••••••••
Grove Avenue
•
wcro wf Ic....... ....q
2
otn u�
....... o.....c.
Rancho Cucamonca, San Bernardino
WITNESS STATEMENTS:
_�. R:CNN.r %tatev�...-.:---�'' conductor „
"I in the`en^ine room when the accident took place and can
train, was
that the engineer has state t.at "a t e correc proce4urAS:
confirm
horn, bells, and slowing the speed down,
the roads, such as sounding the
T e ve was on e'�rac_
was done prior to the collision taking p --
R -iith live
Witness No. 2, Debra HUFF ^fAN, stated that 51: e was nort Doan on rove;
-l-ved in *-- the - �- raz€ie- cool- i- s- ion�ith - -th
-- �irectiy- behind - the -cc � �vo
it that he did not see the wig -laag sign light and went
locomotive seemed
He did no tn�venra to the col -i is on
intothe path of the train. Ke_�Lror
the -soue
_ =igh to
h b very fast at the time. The location
b kes on the train and he was
distance behind the vehicle and I coal ar�ly
ce
where I was, was a short
Iq back
�ee-th
for
vltRess- }�j�� -LCLL j• L
2 caFS behind the vehicle that was involved with the train. From where
I was, S could not see the wig -wag lights, although I could see the arm
going- back -and- forth -=L;,f ...ar- i3rat- trarinralved -with- the-- la3ceometave- d
---- I ...;.h rho train. The riqht front of the train
hit him. I did not notice the brazes on t„c LL O..•, �••- - - - --- - --
-- seen-- to - -be- going - very -f a9 t: —Afters -the- accident- occurzdr-; 9ot-out and--- -
assisted the driver of the vehicle, he was ble =ding very bad, so =y wife
an I, attempted to get him out of the rivers 3oor. -fie door was 7amcned - --
short ; -going -to- h4*e -otrhe r-- s -ide; goital. jussideounddled- h-irnert� and -took-
�._ uosoital. just around the corner."
— ilitness -No .- {-.--duiia -LUND-,- stated -that- she - has -to- oncura-with- ever-y-thi
her husband said, but_like to state further that the rain. was-
heavy at the time of the accodent and eue to the cond'I tionns F t,ie neat
-- artd-the- type-of--device - at -ti+e- railroad-, --it- was - very -- hard -to- see- the-wic
wag sig nal operating. The light that was in the sign, was not visible
her, as she and her husband were approaching the - Iocation.
to
At this time the statements were concluded*
g.
G. Martin,• Deputy --I 10573 110-2 -- - .-._..1-
7
E
rew�a .M '
Sw..............o,now rw,rr.c
counw..we.ewrle....e . n...l
7 suw...c..war,.. T errs colcs,ew
we.owr 1. ....... ..wl
7 orwcw:
— 10.•.20..79 1 1055 1 3616 IM0573 7 3747 -111 8
c.............
Grove Avenue
...........
•� 2
Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino w �•�••••
PHOTOGRAPHS:
photographs were taken of the accident scene and submitted to the
identification bureau for developing.
OPINIONS AND COCICLUSIONS:
—heve
- -It—is t ccident: wotri'r ._.r eceated
if driver of Pl. had not violated. CVC 22451, this requires a person
to stop at a train crossing when a train is in progress. Due to the
rec_o_mne�ed. also associated with this is the fact that the possible
speed of the Vehicle No. 1 was in violation of, CVC 22350, Unsafe Speed
with the WM07ttreM--coTrditiUzm.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Due to the statements made by.. the witnesses in this traffic collision
and having made contact with the investigator of the Southern Pacific
.,MI R_._._ '.h.-,� O��th
— Raiiraad, d ,
_.pacific Railroad. re- evaluate the signal warning system of this inter-
section with their traffic experts to determine if there should be
anything donor— dbuut "'th ... C
.• •G. }'artin, Dep ty i1O.0573 •'__ ..j
! I
1 I (VERIFICATION — "C' 201"S G G P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1
2 COUNTY OF r
3 r aw tA-
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
u tM'bow rnlie/ed'Non; I hove read she faregomg
.ad hwr the wntmw therm /; od I cortih rhos gha ,owe I, trust of m,. hw,eled",'Incept as a cue mea. rhich
arc tAtrein ,w,,d No m, mlorTUius or belie /, and m w (hue s,attu, I beU. a u be 1 .
I catil, lv, dsclmd, undo penelry of polu ,'. Mu the Iogaing is lose and
£ :ecuttd a n Cafifomia
Signature
(PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL -- 101.4, 20155 G C. P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I un a chum o/ the £nited $,."I od a "adens of the count, aIo ndsl; I am son the aR al.4hsem ,en, and at
o port, w the rilhin roddtd a<rtan; m, buinn, add rae u:
1888 Century Park East, #1808, Los Angeles, California 900
0. January 28 19 80 IsnvedtAesOhin CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO
PERSON OR PROPERTY
an the interested parties
in ,a,d aciwa, by placing a irue cap, Mersol enclosed in a sealed envelope ,uilk poswge lhuaos lull, prepod, N the
united Swale, madw Los Angeles
add,nsed as Inuau,:
See Attachment.
I conk (o, dmlue). undo'r;dt, al pe'.". she, the larrgoing is I. asd r000en.
E,reuI'd on Janurya 28, 1980 1 Los Angeles Calif.
Ly Li Lau
-Beth the '.,allow. asd pow) of ,rice by all lomu, baing iPed undo/prWl, e/ pour,, she nos ryaut murYdon,
/
•
•
•
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTACHMENT TO PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
1. Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Clerk
City Hall of Rancho Cucamonga, California
9320 Baseline Road
Unit "C"
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
2. Ms. Doreen Carpenter, City Clerk
City Hall of Upland, California
460 North Euclid Avenue
Upland, California 91786
3. Ms, Andres Disharoon, Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors,
San Bernardino, California
157 West Fifth Street
2nd Floor
San Bernardino, California 92415
INEW
RZ
DATE: January 15, 1980
TO: All City Managers and Administrators of the Omnitrans
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Robert E. Chafin, General Manager
SUBJECT: Amend Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement - Section 10.0 -
Seniority Rights - Consolidate East End Division and Metro
Division
At the meeting of the Omnitrans Board of Directors held on
the 3rd day of October, 1979, The Omnitrans Joint Powers
• Agreement was amended to consolidate the East End Division
with the Metro Division, under Section 10.C., for the pur-
poses of seniority rights determinations.
This amendment must be approved by all agenies within Omni -
trans.
After you have obtained approved from your governing board,
please contact Omnitrans in order that the original document
may be forwarded to you for signature.
Q°�cs"
ROBERT E. CFiAFIN,
GENERAL MANAGER
REC:mrc
Enc. 1
rI
L
1700 WEST STH STREET -SAN BEH NAROINO, f NI A 92411 -TELEPHONE 1714) 383, 5118
1
AMENDMENT TO
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITIES OF
• CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA,
MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REDLANDS,
RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO AND UPLAND
CREATING A COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION
AUTIiORITY TO BE KNOWN AS "OD.ITRANS ".
THIS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT, dated for convenience on the 1st
day of October, 1979, is entered into by and between the County of
SAN BERNARDINO and the CITIES OF CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE,
LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REDLANDS, RIALTO,
SAN BERNARDINO and UPLAND, all of which are bodies politic in the
State of California.
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the parties forming OMNITRANS, a joint powers
authority, desire to amend the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement to
provide for merging of seniority rights of the East End and Metro
• operating divisions; and
WHEREAS, this amendment will provide for the efficient
operation of OMNITRANS;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to the OMNITRANS Joint Powers
Agreement agree as follows:
1. Section 10.C. of the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement
dated March E, 1976 is hereby amended, effective November
1, 1979, to read as follows:
"Section 10.C.
Employees.
Within the period provided in Subparagraph A
(120 days), and prior to initiating public transportation
service, ONNITR,INS shall offer employment to, and shall
• accept the employment of, the public transportation system
Page 1 ��
employees of San Bernardino Transit system and the
San Bernardino County Department of Transportation,
•
Public Transit Division, which employees are identi-
fied in Exhibits "C" and "D ". Exhibits "C" and "D"
are structured to identify the employees as of the
actual date of 011NITRANS takeover of transportation
service. The employment offered by oMNITRANS to
each designated transportation system employee shall
be of substantially the same kind and level as the em-
ployment presently enjoyed by the employee. Salary
and fringe benefits shall be provided to the fullest
extent possible at the current level offered by San
Bernardino Transit System.
OPINITRAIIS employees' seniority rights are appli-
cable only within those operating divisions to which
they are assigned except that effective November 1,
1979, the East End and Metro operating divisions shall
be merged and treated as one (1) division for purposes
of seniority rights determinations. OMNITRANS manage- 4
•
ment may transfer an employee between divisions, and the
employee may maintain seniority rights, subject to the
approval of the OMNITRANS Board.
Employment by OMNITRANS of the pubic transporta-
tion service employees of San Bernardino Transit System
or the San Bernardino County Department of Transporta-
tion, Pul +lic Transit Division, shall be undertaken and
accepted in conformance with any rules or restrictions
imposed by the provision of existing public transporta-
tion grant contracts."
2. All other provisions of the OMNITRANS Joint Powers
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement Amendment to be executed and attested by their proper .•
33
Page 2 of 4
officers thereunto duly authorized as of the day and year first above
• written.
Dated: COUNTY OF SAL] BERNARDINO
ATTEST:
Clerk of t::e Board Chairman
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Board of Supervisors
CITY OF CHINO
Mayor
Dated:
CITY OF COLTON
ATTEST:
Mayor
• City Clerk
Dated:
CITY OF FONTANA
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
• ATTEST:
City Clerk 3� /%/
Page 3 bf 4
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
CITY OF LOMA LINDA
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
A -TEST:
City Clerk
Dated:
ATTEST:
City
CITY OF MONTCLAIR
i
CITY OF ONTARIO
Mayor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY OF REDLANDS •
Mayor
[NY9'i2il�tAMl[9
Mayor
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Mayor
CITY OF UPLAND
Mayor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1980
To: City Council 8 City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: BOND EXTENSION REQUEST - Minor Subdivision 78 -0194
The City Council accepted bonds for security of street improvement installation
or. December 20, 1978 for the above mentioned Minor Subdivision.
The developer, Bowdon E Nicolas, has requested a six (6) month extension on
the improvement agreement. They cite "partner illness" as the reason for not
pursuing the improvement installations.
The improvements are required'to be installed at the southeast corner of 19th
Street and Jasper. Improvement plans have been approved.
RECOMMENDATION:
• It is recommended that the City Council approve the extension request and
direct the City Engineer to notify the developer of said approval.
Respectfully submitted,
i
i� /
loy Hubbs
City Engineer
LBH:deb
•
36
LAND DIVISION APPLICATION
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MS011310N
WHEREAS, INS L-n,J T, V-ahl Ap. li-g 2, as beep
e., 'J, ' . adll
'o. '-5 2..
..19TH 6rr
(e) Si &
KENNETIO
'q AS
PA my of San L,.-, i. , - EXISTING A-2!
0' 2 HOUSF -
'e
'w
to I
c�
(ouvE) TWEET
a
SITE •PA, GAR I'
p . 2
r
C)
COPY W .w 4sls Ir N. w .11 .e ss a xN writ. Aesws This Nee Mew4wwM.n telr. twit,
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES)
To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
/1415 O Street
Sacramento, Calif. 95814 San E ^r-v m 14nn
Io,msmv s..vm. c.<nn.hl
The undersigned hereby applies for
licenses described os follows:
1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S)
FILE NO.
_
;CI �t+� -) %''.'ci tc '.iZ:iL
::ililau ;:.:vC2
4!
Applied under Sec. 440 �
Effective Date: =er
FEE NO.
GEOGRAPHICAL
CODE
Dote
Issued
4. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S)
Temp. Permit
,Effective Date:
A:Lt. ^. ?n" .�. •
' rucc
Psi ^t727u _ "13T•IIC° .r.M1-: P'."
0. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S)
FEE
LIC.
TYPE
r:!
$ ?00.0r)
49
A14NUAT M
1,74.30
4. Nome of Business
:'izaa IN Stuff UT 27
5. Location of Business— Number and Street
9740 -19th st.
City and Zip Code Ca tents,
?ancho Caca:nowa 91 71) San Pernnriftinc
RECEIPT NO. ;iorly TOTAL
134.PO
If Premises Licensed, 41 t0 C`E cancelled upon iGEfUDnCE) 7. Arc Premises Inside
Show Type of Llcenu it City Limits? yr; g
8. Moiling Address (if different from 5)— Number and Street (ywwp) test.)
9. Hove you ever been convicted of o felony? 10. Hove you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Department per.
NO Iaining to the Act? N0
.I L: Explain a "YES" answer ro items 9 or 10 on on attachment which shelf be deemed port of this application.
14. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on -sale licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and
(b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Ad,
17. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Bsln.BarDar@in0 _ _ Date .1/443,0 ... ....
uwd ow-lh N r.i-,, ewh pow— wIww .i1n.Iw. were." W.w, ewhh. and wpI Its M. is IM .pprnnh w w N m..rNk.m., w m.hw
Mn.r If Its serevwx ,wsw. w,, rwr" in IM Iwepine wNileMn. III, wMwtW m —I. Mn serum"- m Its MMIh PI IMI M M. are IM Iw..
plp opNllanm aM I.-w. or 1 Ihm0 vM IMI ewh me alt .t rM .blemem. IMtein m.M an 1—; PI IMI w p ,. wlm I ww IM .pNiaml
.pNit. r he. r I;—, w ireaNl tmtsl its IM .posse eppits..K bwiwr. r. 6. 1.ndw1N . tv IM Ism..... fw whkh Mis 'tins s mwe.:
is) 1M. Its. 1r.wfw ..plimli.n .I "" n—Ifw n nab a uuhf, IM p-eml el . Ism - It fNRll — q,—. mbrd in ,-r. M- ni,ww 1101
h,. w. "we Its. d., a whits IM1e 11-141 epplimi— M'rise nhh 0* D.p.nm..a x 1. Mi. w 1.611A . w.fennn 1, w Iw .., usub. N Mmfww w N
Nbp.d w —1 aed,t of tit —F.rw; (5) IMI rM Ironlw 1p il.n. m., he wehdrown b, ei1Mr IM oppli—w w IM linnue wish In nwl(M P.6i111, N
inivre r
14. APPLICANT
SIGN MERE
ekx
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Dote
•shun pm.It, of pNIN,. with m,.m w4aN 0gw1we spew,. Ml.w. IenlRn and sri III Ne is Its. lilmlx, Is a uwulo. sthow If IM Iwpwm INMNe
Iwri d its Its Iwepe:na Iromfer ppNtlNbry "If .rlhw:'.d I m.b this 11.11lw epolilNi.. — . h.Mll; PI IW Is Mnb, rues, ufi ,.tins le .uwmNr
.11 M IM . whwJ tin WO hu,;. bl.w wM I n1w w e I. M..Mh.m .resat lash- tndilmN a 1M open "u., .I Mts sepia
Iwm, I ilw.wlh ..I., i..pw -N b Te tri 91 IMI �d Its x11 -1w apol'o i- or prpo.N '—shit is o1 weds b nlbl, IM q,M.M .f . 1 .n w b mch
.peemnr mHM mNe IMn ntmry dwa rwedin Me ue, en 'sits the I mire oplk.Iien is n hire with %a Donswu wMy le n w nMNi.s e
prNw -t w hr m wrei. N Ir-0 - w N si w wwty n, IMilw If ua slaw; (.1 1MI IM nw.,hss p�INYn m.T V wiN,�so b, eiMN dIs
.wk.«« d» rlmx: wish h. M.drrw earl, r. Its o.rwhh.nl, CITY OF In.ir:! C CL'C'h1ONGA
. 1 16. N ... I.) of Licenuefs) 17. SianaNrdil of Licemeets) ire "ICI"' 18: 11extue Nmrlberld
IA4 )y
CO■ ■ a...r I.c..w— ..n w .c a N.t WrN. AMe !Y! l w NrNw .n O nn OMy
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) 1
1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) F
FILE NO.
FEE NO.
d. If Premises Licensed,
Show Type of Licens
B Moiling Address (if c
5)— Number and Sheet
rremisea moue � .� _J
.. 9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Department per•
fairing to the Act?
I1. Enpfain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on on anachmenl which shall be deemed port of'Ihis application.
14. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on -sole licensed premises will have oll the qualifications of a ficensee, and
(b) that he will not violate or cause or pefmit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act,
13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of_w; L: ::an1 ::O Date v
"t, ryndly el wins[, red, NNI— nMw newM1n .Hoerr Mlwr, WiM. oM wI.: (1) N. k IM geliwnp w ew N IM oolliven, x on wwutiw
.awr el IM ewliwnl arrnnli, wmM in IM Ixewine eplkgkn. Mlr emMri.N b melt rpp eryliwlim nn 11. MMII: PI IMI M Ms [red IM Mn
pine
aoolinwnneb , iw aM Fw . IM mbnn Ih.mr M w[F and .II d M Iwbmu Nnnr., A —; 131 'No, ne on— e1w, I. m.
so, ewlkwl
en, errs er IndYwl inlxr n IF..1i-1. w .purer bv.inro ro M ondunN volon .ce Ikmwbl I. .rhilb This wis kwbn'i. mN.;
HI NM IF. .... l.r e..lk. ise r 11" •nwf- k net wM ro -tidy 1,1. w,w. d e Ion w le W611 on eere.meM wM1l.d s"' mx. own "'on Iwl
do, o.wdine'No Ill — whkh IM 1-ntlx eolieslian i. Rl.d wnh IM u..enmem No'. win w otoeli.F o w.bl.w. to w fw Nor o.elx .1 .."nor w No
dNreM er Inlw. wl rnditw
If Irembrar: UI tMI IM Iwndn splitslisn No, M wi w—o 4r .ilMr IM loolk. l er tM 6 -in' no nxAiM noes" N
Ih. o.eel —I.
14. APPLICANT
SIGN HERE...
APPLICATION BY TRANSIEROR
15, STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Dme
uM.r one", of o(M1. enh .xwn whe...Ien.M. op". be... anti.' .M ..": (1) M i. Ih. li[mo.. w .n wwuli.. NRew N .M [w.w.M1 11[MMr
• Iwmee o tM Iwrynne Imn.br eryll[en n. Mly auMwi -d b now IFi. $—Ifor 'p ieorian e n Mh.11; !I: Mot N. M,A, —%. eglkeNw or rwaMw
.11 iwxa. in ,M wM1.Md ne. rolq d..NMd III— end IN . ndx wo, Ie IM o..lkew .M a loelim indi[.IN w th..we� .MM10 of thi...ilkoiw
Ions 11 Iwh hemin I........ lr IN. IN—le; M no, rh. I —ndw .wll[oiw er M"Nor n.ndx • wI nee, IN soirly 1M prow .l . s— . -MALI
.ewm.nl mroM m... IMn niwh NP wxMim M. My a whkh IM '. $1. eon -tiwr11 n1.1 weh m. porlmwl ro win In ausent, .
w ewe w Ix wr ["No N '1 ...f. o n d.kwe w i*I- nyne" o' el 'Newton": ;.I IMI the nwdl. N, ..mp No own N'
ewlkwl N IM Iltww..rilA w -.vi i' 1i HIM, I. IM 0.rynvoe" rl �l�
16, Nome(!) of license*(,) 17. Signature(!) .f Licensae(U PTY qF RANCE0 C ^umbe!(e) Abaft
rnu .1 w.m
L
COP, M Net M>iM AMr. this 1Ir —e.. NwMwr,... attic. 0.1.
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) (/
FILE NO.
To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
FEE NO.
'1215 O Street
Sacramento, Calif. 95814 ^7.. °,^-1: 1: r`:i t•n
J p Spki_; Gar::(:''IL
•
GEOGRAPHICAL
km..nlo...vlx.. «nn.n1
CODE ?.•.=rli
The under.iiii hereby applies far
Date
licenses described as /allows:
j';,�
Issued '
4. NAMES) OF APPLICANTS)
Temp. Permit
Applied under Sec. 44044 {]
.:: )1y n
T: :v
Effective Date 1, nn
Effective Dote:
3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S)
FEE
LIC.
TYPE
S
"05.J0
wt�
A. Name of Business CT tiG
toted X124%7') :COr 46,000)
S. Lacafion of Busimas— Number and Street
97i4 -9V - LJ('.t.S St.
City and Z'Ip'Code county
n%T;SChQ- ..,^.1 ^.2 r•n 11771)1
'1e 5t7)
F;20. TOTAL
RECEIPT NO. $'z %J3
$
< 7 t
6. If
7. Are Premises Inside
I'll. Mailing Address (if different from 5)— Number and Street Norp) Mwoe)
-Ira xin I. Ti >irht, .. ^J. 9171,.5 m• ":P
9.' Have you ever been convicted of a, felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic
` Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Department per
n twining to the Act? 't",
11. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this upplicalion
14, Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on -sole licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and
(b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of 2 )_.. . _ . Dole U." 1AN
1I PI of Miurr, tan por— whan .iymlm uppers Mbs, errNM. aM ow'; (1) M. i, IM pPiulk, w m N IM wksovan, w
.e[w N Mo applimm rM. wim, n m.d i IM fwnfoine rWimien, duly emhwind �I mono ISi. .ppliavlien w in Mhell; 121 IMt M M. rwd the ton.
ii wAli<.lion oM ho.s In. ronl.... Pwrof and IMI wnh one all of IM s, s Ihenin moA u m; P) rM, m pn.m .IMr IMn A. oppli <wn
.ppik-1. h., m, dank w mdolk, innrnl IM aplis -1.1 w .Nli[e kou-n se M nMUrnd ows. Ioklkl) I. wMd An .pplle.N.n n nniy
Idl 1Mk kb 1-11., epplimIi., or wowed 11 —dw n.l mad. 1. w,idr kAr ..'vok of . L.n w le We .n pr- .m Auked in n III nuns, !NI
Mp pr.<.d'rn. 1h, do, a nhhh Ina ml.r appli...... i, nbd .4h III. D.p ol—I w nabli.h a probt— 1. w (w an, 11 AI., N st —lAkw r N
d.lwud e a , <ndikor a Inmina,; 111 'hot the a nJn applin,ian may M .i1Mn na b, 16141 kh. appli.ml w It. Iknu..nh na mWIiM li. \Airy n
M. O.
14. APPLICANT —•`
SIGN HERE _...u✓ ..f 'n.,k,� .. .,. .,. ,
1c? /' eb
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of `.2.411 " Dote
UP wneln .f ".rick.. w<n wrwn .hw. .ipmlun .pp.... b.lp.. anino Inc . %.: ul n. . A. le.m.., n nn...IMw of A. <.rp«m u<m....
• mm.I in A. IwM.m. kor.l^ oppliori.n, dW, amn.nnd m metal Ai. to now ..outli.n .n n b.holl; Itl NwIIM•Mnbr InM. pppli<afi.n n .wnMw
.II Mtooll in Iis wo.th.d liu wla d.wki wd bola eM I nsla IM aPPI" nl owl w W.."" inliml.d an IM u.pr prli.n of Ali% irinti
Iw it ,wh Inkl1w ekkPo f or In. Dinww; 'f1 kMl In. al ml., applinli- w gepo,.d 11 mbr —" Ia lid, Nx Ponk.l N . I.m w to Met
wk ..rnm.n. .nnnd' s. mM. IMn nml, sW,I pn.diM It. M, a whim Ih. Irpnsl.r ...lkalion k'iI Al. PIA nn 0.Mrlm.nl N I. e.ln w e.l.bliA .
PMwem. 1. w Iw an, trNilw N nen.l.nr w to d.lraud At .n, m ndilw .1 111 IMI IM IkMdn oMl. m.y M -i".. .0her
opIkool w M. fit-.. v Ih m m I. 1M 0wook l ex
cn ■ ■ ._ less r..wa W No Wrin, AM a TMs li «-1w NeNe «1111 o gn
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
1, TYPE(S) OF LICENSES)
FILE NO.
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
FEE NO.
1215 O Street —•
ale_t:i
- - -: •-
_'a
�i_�+s:rc.
GEOGRAPHICAL
Sacramento, Calif. 95811
mmetv,..�lna caap.wel
..;r
CODE j131r,
The undersigned hereby opplie+for
Date
licenses described as follows:
'::� �T /1 /.Ja
Applied under Sec. 2/011 -E{
laved
Temp. Permit
2. NAME(5) OF APPLICANT(S)
Effective Date: % / =%
Effective Date:
3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S)
FEE
LIC.
TYPE
rAlnt.231
';.l?e..
A. Name of Business 21
4 �...
S. Location of Buvinest— Number and Street
dates .1/2:3/7) iOr 4w
C=—
0 /., Gore 2oothill tic 7ine711-1
EF
�< Y
City and Zip Code County
:li1C'J� �LLCa;:10A!l'i'` 1G .R.,-:L'- is
,
cQECEIFT NO. "�' TOTAL
. If Premises
8. Mailing Address (if different from 5)— Number and Street
9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony?
x.11. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an
r. per ..rraan.e. 4. i vs...,,
City Limits?:,
10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Department per.
taining to the Act?
shall be deemed part of this application.
12. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on -sale licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and
(b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to to violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of I)taR :%CrOBP'aT`.O Dater
Undn 1.11, el seiML with I'— whew eiymlw• weseel Mlaw, rerinn and wp: (1) Me i! IM ee,11-1, w we N IM wpliki w
dlnn el the week. twpere"o, ninewl in he fereeeine Klulerien. MI. eulhwiwd I maF Oel •ppllemien •n N "1 let tMI he N. -it IM 1 «.
.wine weliwlien and hma, the ern Iwnel aM IN, ewh •nd •II el ON ,M•T• Ihnei. mar le. —; (s) IMr ne iu— .,he' Ih- IM apNirwrl
III arollronn NI •q dirwl w ine-I Will... in the apelirmrr w gplwenlY Muller ter he eeMrrNd rMnlrhe 16enulU In whilb /hie eplirelien I, «L;
111 Ihnt the bent eppllwlien It revered namLr i, ml mar w W ll, the "wri er, a a Ian er le blfill an aisles. wined Ina w•n IMn ven, nin
4p prawill. he der en .MIh the 1111141 epptiwuw it filed with tM Dep•rtwenl w 1. Min w .11-614 1, a r l—re. he It Iw ..r vin iter Is Mnder•r Or he
OTT —I w enr uwuler al rnnebrw; 15) 'be' 1be Irendn .111.4:1 ww be wh.—n !1 either IN appliwM •r 0. linnwe with no WeniM I: -Nlil N
IM a.,.., e
11. APPLICANT
SIGN HERE
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
Ill ..I]VULI 1
�. STATE Of CALIFORNIA Count' of � DaM1n1
Uttde I'll el Miurr, ewlt plan ,eltew ,Ipnem• where. Mbv, t1NR1 eM .11 11) he is the literve. r re •IRe1 N tM rneerele'it...
M1Me in ne IwMeiM Innlln ve seli•n. Mh teeNvue, IT wvO *it 11.11111 eryliwlien n I Mhel4; 1]) AW N NION :twh1 wNstell" w 1nmWr
all Inl «1 M IM wnrled IUwrell) OIel"W a WI.w hM IT rreneNr w« n rM ."k-ei end er its inNelld w IM .hen seethe N Air Mhliwliwt
#1 N ,nh .1.411 I. apwhrN Y1 A. airwln; dl thel IM «nrin wok-ke, w reveled Irentler tar whM 1l, wll,lr Al, "Ileve 1 e .. n he MNI
«seewm eteerN hell, nee thw niter N1 pwv N the Mr w whuh Mh Renter ewnie.iw1eil 6,W wnh The Dhh.mWe ve le Min w WWIA e
hne. I. Or In err ut ilr a munfrnl n N Mhwe Or Inwn in usehi hnlller; la IMI the Irweise o«INNwn ww be .nheree. br Well, The
hhhlWte w Nu Ikwwh w1A w neltiM IINiIUr 1l, Al, prywMwl. / .
16. Nume(s) of licertsee(s) 17. Signalule(s ofrlmensee(s) 18. lI<eme Number(f)
CUR 6 e.. r.. A e....n .w. a w.r wrB. Atewe. Two ue.41i.r n..dewwlrs oek. ors.
APPLICAlliON FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES)
1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSES)
FILE NO.
To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Central
FEE NO.
1215 O Street
GEOGRAPHICAL
Sacramento, Calif. 95814
u
oa mr...vma s«Arw,ot
_ .. .,v ....•
CODE
The undersigned hereby applies for
Date
licenses described as Willi
Issued
Temp. Permit
2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S)
Applied under Sec. 24044 ❑
.. _ ..; l..
Effective Dole:'• r _/ •
Effective Date:
7. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S)
FEE
LIC.
TYPE
$
4. Nome of Business
5. Location of Business — Number and Street
..�• ). .:4.iiA.i: J1Vd.
Ci and Zip Country
h! p Coe
"`
RECEIPT NO. TOTAL
:. i:llnax,
6. If Premises Licensed, . r y.,. 7. Are Premises Inslae
Shaw Type of License 'i% Ls�1:T.0 JS iiy '. -hd ;.A� City LimiH7 • "
. Mailing Address (if different from 5)— Number and Street ,r, r t fr.npl P.rwf
9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony?, 10. Move you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Department per-
taining to the Act?
11. Explain a'IYE5" answer to items 9 or 10 on on anachmenl which shelf be deemed part of this application.
12. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on -sale licensed premises will have all the qualifications of a licensee. and
(b) that he will not violate or cause or permit m be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Ad.
12. STATE Of CALIFORNIA County of .. �:? �'LT' ° °`l =L "' Date -. f'''ir
ate« pmss, N ryrrv9. .wx prawn wM« rien'Iw. 11- blew, 1-mfin eM cap: (1) IN D ex aPNimro, to ww r IM .Mlleena. or on oxrllw
wlkx r Mr ePNLwa unnowsim, wlmd in M. I «,mine bovskum. Mlr srdxirN to :mM his worliwri..n is bobb"; (I) Ih^I M Mr roil ew row.
wins apli<«ien ate owns IRw u- r M.,W end thol .xR and on a IM rw s th in maH .r. Iwu Iil IRo1 m ownsh wMr IMr IM poubso l
w ilhown Mt wv db «t w indLnt li n IM .pgiaw w Wnbinl, Macon to M aondnld -do, tM Iw.rwi f« w" Mis w.ik.liw is wdl;
(d) IMr IM worst., iswiimtien .r wapatW 1 nll« it IM node so with? M. bo Mnl It . town or w feet" on snownwnr .nxrN ;.. n«r. town .;" (ral
dwp It ... din. Is. car on wRwb nn w..l« .,,i .ots.. is filed nuh ow 0.0erlmtnl It to pin or o.thlob a welrwnr. 1. It t« mr most. 0 mmnh-not to r.
Mlwrd It on, ndiwr of n.ndmw: 01 Mal Ica bowrw awliwlnn ,my M wiiW,.wn by .ilhw tM 000liainl x M. W.mw with no main . liw41i11 N
M. Uw.rrmenl.r•
14. APPLICANT
SIGN HERE .. ,. .. ..... ., ... ...... . ......
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Dote ..
andx wnollr N oeriwr..wb m us" wlr.0 s;a ^.1111 ooenn bdaw, mtiRn .M w r 111 M. is IM Iwenm, in .o Nkx r Nx raww.N Ilaww
• ,caused in 1M fewwn. w.ns1.1 wMrp n, ory ovMOnu. is masMn ".cola .oln.nw e a h.Mll; l,, M.1n Mr MMr wow woFrwlion N wnxW,
.II in lM .nw<hN ao ols) caw /b.d b.l.w .d l wax . is its wpnr....nil x «aim indiwtd o two rower oonM N TN owismo.n
Inn, lllosnb woes, is ewwoed br Ih. D'nwor: 13, Mw oih. ow.wlo �ewbuww ., wooed rooter is cot n.w to wlist, ew ryre.d, cal • Iwn w to Mfix
on Wines .wsM la. m nyon nm1, do,, Pb<d;w M. der m which Ih. ndx aolianliw is Rld with Ms stpM:wm w N us. w taxi .
on, .w• cats . wv mono, 0 weds. o, N wrw.d on inwn. on, ndn« e1 wwoeww; In the th. bw het o..lhwl:w nor bI xiMx.wn by Intent rte
em iaonr by IM eroww with o wwaiM Inebiniv N no 000rtmwt.
16. Nalnep) of Licensee(,) 17. Signoture(,) of Licensee(s) 18. Lion" Number(s)
(0 Ply M net bbue-- ItNrrre dl cgte.
9
W Nat Write Above This Lim —tee BpMeemb. aM4 only
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES)
T. TYPE(SI OF LICENSE(S)
FILE NO
ial Daporiladni al n,mholi, Baneraga Control
FEE NO.
1215 O Street
- Sacramento, Calif. 95814 n rydTf ?.:O
.1 .:wi _...... .. .•y.
GEOGRAPNICAI
CODE
The undersigned hereby applies for
Date
ficenses described as la0awsr
Issued
2. NAME(S) OF APPL(CANT(S)
Temp. Permit
Applied under Sec. 24044 C
:LthO.^. Do
EHectoe Dar.: j•- 3P.Cf
Effective Date:
3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S)
FEE
LIC.
TYPE
S
?mr,T f. bran Pt:,:)
�9
4. Name of Business
.i S. ^.R 'li Ltuf
S. Locafion of and Street
r%F:fi 1rlth
9ITC:1Otla oa1SOtl !^ ^aunty
ern
Y.1'`Cofflin; ,.arlino
RECEIPT NO. TOTAL
S
;o.vli
If Premises licensed, 7. Are Premises Inside
Show Type of License Cy limits? Yes
B. Moiling Address (if different from 5)— Number and Street (Tom,) (P.)
^.e . PTT.
9. Have you ever been convicted of o felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of The Alcoholic
Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Deportment per.
tolning to the Act?
11. Elrploin a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an oltochment which shrill be deemed part of this application.
12. Appkinn, agrees In) shot any manager employed in orl -sole licensed premiss will hove all the qualifications of o licensee, and
(b) shot he will not violate ar cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA i County of ;an Bernardino Pat* V"I/3110
once Pawl,v al M11.11 ewb Pelwn oMw .ipmrwe PPpap Mlew, cordon end se 111 Me 'be °Mrmn. be one N rbe epoli —is, w
al&w N the so,nne. rWererisn, --a i rbe 1wo..;ne °rMirwgn, MI...11eeised rte ..be Ihis eppliaerim on Ile bMell; 111 One. be be, cad the fort
soma aponmlion aM bona he Ibwed avl Iher each end on of rM ,loft —h Inn m°0. one true; (]) you no Mew °on rMn rM gNkwr
w sojolk. . hec ear, din ind l 1 " rbe apolk-Is ot aovlwann h ineu ro b t.ndal °d u,Ma rM Annual Ire vb'd run ePplbF°n is m°h;
111 drat the 1 nsfw aPaliaar',On a prwpnd rr nrtr 1 men I ,;,is Ihe sin-1 al a loan be Ia fulfill a in'sonenl Mhred in" ma IMn nine" lrel
do,, MecNine ibe car aM1;<b rho Immler nlv`N.ien 11 .led wilb the ToP.Mm°nr w n lin o oro.hif o webnne. u w Ire a open rot howlerw w u
ddreud ar inie any 11,411.1 of anndnw;, IA IM1ar rM numfer Wvouo, mar be withdrawn by tnher IM arpf—V q- A%Nwnn.nwino na mWtiM uyebil'nr h
re, Wewl -11. 1. f ^ .
14. APPLICANT _- ._.,/ CI lY GF RA;;;';O C % ^. !nr•,�
SIGN HERE - AwAlullS1'RAtICPI) �+wi
•�Py ?tic:. _ - =- ........_ __ _�b�' __
�'- ��.��%•'S� r ' z APPLICATION OT TRANSFEROR EMti'� ^v
15, STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of inn "ernnrdiuD ?t."BTfl�dfil2lli�13' PIN
141516
•anew wneur d youm" .m oh— o....... .preen Mlow. erne., aM r. "u IP He , the eaww, w on ...mrl4 afire, of eM uep°ren. Me-.w,
earned in Poe fwNwne r wow yplkalbn. doh ourhwa.d I mob Ihn r mrrfe, app4nYm an , beha1F, pl eler se h°:oiby meow ,se—liw r uneven
ell i n 1M eewbsd lice nhl Mnrib,d be(.. .M r wll.r n 11. anM°.I end .,l?ons. n indinM en IM worry p use, N this aaPW;,.;-
Lotto .. nundw i .ppro.ed be IM akwur; Ito rM1 AIM ...It.r applk.riw ae vroyanA Leander Mr made a vent, ,M pareenr d . b.n w L fossil
oer.w,n aenN men Men n r dap punch, M° d°, a wMCb rM r wdw .solkenion`i. WN wuh nor tores"w;n w b min .r ur°NiM e
,Tds.ww 1. w Ire on,nnodibe d e.ndew or b d.ln.d w n, na,,d ;,. d hond°rw; Ids rM1 IM eun.fw °avlkwion m.1 b .klNn.n b, .ia°n no
°ry1k°m w rM Ikmn wire no nWhio, liabilur la the aeprrmwhr
r "Agnenica, Anthony Be
V t ..
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 6, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: lack Lam, Director of Community Development
Subject: SECOND READING - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 79 -05 -
City of Rancho Cucamonga - An Ordinance establishing
standards and review procedures for Planned Community
Developments
At the January 16, 1980 meeting, the City Council reviewed and approved
the first reading of the Planned Community Ordinance. A copy of the Ordi-
nance is attached for your review.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve second
• reading of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -05.
Re pectfully su tted,
.G. .. i " � /f
JA LAA M, Director of
Community Development
JL:nm
•
e[u
1
Ord. 94 1/29/80 kds
Page 1
ORDINANCE NO. 94
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMEND-
MENT NO. 79 -05 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES
FOR PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION It Purposes:
A. The Planned Community Zone is included in the Zoning
regulations to achieve the following purposes.
1. To promote and protect the public health, safety,
and welfare.
2. To implement the objectives and policies of the
General Plan.
;. To safeguard and enhance environmental amenities and
the quality of development.
4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages
resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use
• of land resources.
5. To lessen congestion and assure convenience of
access; to secure safety from fire, flood, and other
dangers; to provide for adequate light, air, sunlight,
and open space; to promote and encourage conservation
of scarce resources; to prevent overcrowding of land
and undue concentration of population; to facilitate
the creation of a convenient, attractive, and harmonious
community; to attain a desirable balance of residential
and employment opportunities; and to expedite the
provision of adequate and essential public services.
6. To facilitate development within the City in accordance
with the General Plan by permitting greater flexibility
and encouraging more creative and imaginative designs
for major urban development projects subject to
large-scale community planning.
•
7. To promote more economical and efficient use of the
land while providing a harmonious variety of housing
choices and commercial and industrial activities, a
high level of urban amenities, and preservation of
natural and scenic qualities of open space.
vru. 94 1,
Page 2
8. To provide a process for initiation, review, and
regulation of large -scale comprehensively planned
urban communities that affords the maximum flexibility
to the developer within the context of an over-all
development program and specific, phased development •
plans coordinated with the provision of necessary
public services and facilities.
SECTION 2: General Requirements
A. A Planned Community Zone shall include a minimum area of
300 contiguous acres, under single ownership or otherwise
subject to unified planning, construction, and development
by a person, corporation, or other entity; property owned
by public utilities, local districts or local governments
will not be counted toward the 300 acre minimum, but may
be used as a connector of single ownership.
B. A Planned Community Zone shall be established upon application
of a property owner, in accordance with the procedure set
forth in Section 61.0221 of the San Bernardino County
Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, and subject to the following provisions:
1. Submission of a Development Plan for consideration
by the Planning Commission and approval of the City
Council, pursuant to this ordinance.
2. Determination by the Council that the establishment •
of the zone and approval of the Development Plan
shall:
a. Provide for the development of a comprehensively -
planned urban community within the zone that is
superior to development otherwise allowable
under alternate regulations.
b. Provide for development within the zone in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development and growth management
policies of the City.
C. Provide for the construction, improvement, or
extension of transportation facilities, public
utilities, and public services required by
development with the zone.
SECTION 3: Use Regulations
A. Allowable uses in each Planned Community Zone shall be as
established by a Development Plan Text approved by the
City Council. The Development Plan Text may incorporate
uses by reference to specific base zone provisions, or
may establish specific use lists with definitions pertaining
thereto. •
46
Page 3
•
B.
Existing uses within the Planned Community Zone at the
time of its establishment shall be deemed allowable and
incorporated in the Development Plan, unless terminated
'
discontinued, or changed pursuant to a specific time
schedule incorporated in the Development Plan Text.
C.
Unless otherwise provided by the Development Plan Text,
public utility facilities and publicly-owned facilities
shall be allowable subject to a Conditional Use Permit.
D.
Unless otherwise provided by the Development Plan Text,
accessory uses or facilities shall be subject to the same
use regulation provisions as the principal use or facility.
E.
Unless specified as subject to a Conditional Use Permit,
each allowable use in the Planned Community Zone shall be
subject to Director Review.
F.
Home Occupations pursuant to Ordinance No. 72 shall be
allowable in each Planned Community.
- SECTION 4:
Site Development Regulations and Performance Standards
A.
Planned Community Zone and all uses therein shall be
•
designed and developed in a manner compatible with and
complementary to existing and potential development in
the general vicinity of the zone. Site planning on the
perimeter shall provide for the mutual protection of the
zone and surrounding property from potential adverse
influences.
B.
There shall be no minimum area, width, or depth requirement
for individual lots, except as established by a Development
Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Director Review or by
_
Location and Development Plan.
C.
There shall be no minimum yard requirement for individual
lots except as established by a Development Plan, a
Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan, or
by Director Review.
D.
There shall be no minimum usable open space requirement
for individual lots, except as established by a Development
Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development
Plan or by Director Review.
E.
There shall be no maximum height or coverage requirement
for individual lots, except as established by a Development
Plan, a Specific Plan, Community Plan, a Conditional Use
`
Permit, Location and Development Plan or by Director
Review.
47
Ord. 94 1/29/80 kds
Page 4
The maximum number of dwelling units within a Planned
Community Zone shall not exceed the number of units
indicated by the General Plan for property within the
zone designated for residential use by the General Plan,
provided that the distribution of units within the zone
and the maximum or minimum residential density on any
individual site or within designated portions of the zone
shall be governed by the Development Plan, Location and
Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, or Director
Review approval pursuant to the Development Plan.
G. All public streets within or abutting the development
shall be dedicated and improved to City specifications
for that particular classification of street. Private
streets within the development shall be permanently
reserved and maintained for their intended prupose by
means acceptable to and enforceable by the City. Consideration
of other forms of access, such as pedestrian ways, courts,
plazas, driveways, horse trails, bike trails, or open
parking lots offered for dedication may be made at the
time of the Development Plan and Text consideration as a
means of meeting requirements for open space or park
dedication requirements.
H. All development within a Planned Community Zone shall
relate harmoniously to the topography of the site, shall
make suitable provision for the preservation of water
courses, drainage areas, wooded areas, rough terrain, and
similar natural features, and shall otherwise be so
designed inasmuch as possible, to use and retain natural
features and amenities to the best advantage.
I. Mechanical and electrical equipment, including air conditioners,
antennas, pumps, heating or cooling or ventilating equipment,
exterior lighting, or similar equipment shall be located
and operated in a manner so as not to unreasonably disturb
the peace, quiet, and comfort of neighboring residents.
Excluding roof-mounted solar collector panels and decorative
exterior lighting, all such equipment and devices shall
be screened from view from any abutting street, and shall
not be located in a street yard.
J. All areas for storage of maintenance equipment, and all
service areas including refuse storage and collection
facilities, shall be enclosed by a fence, wall, or landscape
screen.
K. All uses within a Planned Community Zone shall provide
off- street parking and loading facilities pursuant to
61.0219(b) of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted
by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The
applicant may apply for and receive administrative relief
from Section 61.0219(b) at the time of Development Plan
Tentative consideration by the Planning Commission and
approval by the City Council when verified proof has been
submitted through specific examples of existing projects
and /or expert testimony that supports reduced parking
standards or stalls.
C,
J
Ord. 94 1/29/80 kds
Page 5
L. The proposed means for assuring continuing existence,
maintenance and operation of the various common elements
and facilities.
• M. Additional site development regulations and performance
standards applicable to individual uses or to designated
portions of a Planned Community Zone may be established
by the Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Location
and Development Plan, or Director Review approval pursuant
to the Development Plan.
SECTION 5: Pre - Application Procedure
Prior to submitting an application for a Planned Community
Zone, the applicant or prospective developer should hold
preliminary consultations with the Director of Community
Development and other City officials to obtain information
and guidance before entering into binding commitments
incurring substantial expense in the preparation of
plans, surveys and other data. Such preliminary consultations
should be relative to a conceptual development plans
which includes, but is not limited to, the following:
I. Proposed land uses to be developed within the zone.
2. Development concepts to be employed.
3. Schematic maps, illustrative material, and narrative
• sufficient to describe the general relationships
between land uses, and the intended desgin character
and scale of principal features.
4. A preliminary time schedule for development, including
quantitative data, such as population, housing
units, land use acreage, and other data sufficient
to illustrate phasing of development and potential
impact on public service requirements.
8. Following initial preliminary consultations pursuant to
this section, the Director may require submission of a
competently prepared housing market analysis, demonstrating
the need for housing by price range and number of dwelling
units. Such analysis may be requested as a part of the
pre - application review procedure, may be made a requirement
for submission of an application for a Planned Commanity
Zone or may be requested as part of the environmental
assessment or EIR.
C, Following initial preliminary consultations pursuant to
this section, the Director may require submission of a
competently prepared commercial market analysis for any
proposed shopping center of major commercial uses, showing
the need for such uses in the location requested and the
inadequacy of existing zoned sites to meet this need.
. The market analysis shall include, but not be limited to,
the following:
�9
1
Ord. 94 1/29/80 kds
Page 6
I. Determination of potential trade area.
2. Estimates of existing and future population of the
trade area.
3. Determination of existing and potential effective
buying power in the trade area.
4. Determination of the net potential customer buying
power for the proposed commercial development.
Such analysis may be requested as a part of the pre -
application review procedure, or may be made a requirement
for submission of an application for a Planned Community
zone, or may be requested as part of the environmental
assessment or EIR.
D. Followirg initial preliminary consultation pursuant to
this section, the Director may require presentation of
the conceptual development plan to the Planning Commission.
Such presentation shall be for information purposes only,
and shall be in addition to subsequent public review
requirements pursuant to an application for a Planned
Community Zone and submission of Development Plan.
SECTION 6: Development Plan
A. The Development Plan to be submitted with an application
for a Planned Community Zone shall include the following:
I. A boundary survey map of the property and a calculation
of the gross land area within the proposed zone. A
tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the
applicant proposes to subdivide the property.
2. A topographic map and general grading concept plan
with specific sections for sensitive areas, as
determined by the Grading Committee for the property
and adjacent land within 100 feet of the property,
shown at contour intervals not to exceed 2 feet for
natural slopes over 2% or less. For natural slopes
over 2% contour interval shall not exceed 5 feet.
3. Maps and supporting tabulations showing the current
General Plan land use designation, the current
zoning classification, and the current land use
within the proposed zone and on adjacent sites
within 300 feet. The location of structures and
other significant improvements shall be shown.
•
•
4. A land use plan identifying areas within the proposed
zone and uses to be developed therein, supported by
proposed or projected acreage, population, housing
units, employment, and such related planning and
development data as the Director of Community Development •
may require.
��
Ord. 94 1/29/80 kds
Page 7
5. A development plan indicating the general phasing or
anticipated schedule, indicating the total phasing
of the Planned Community and areas to be developed
• in phases and the anticipated time schedule for
beginning of construction and for completion of each
phase of development including a pro rata share of
amenities, parks and open space. This is a generalized
schedule and may be adjusted according to market
constraints as the Community develops.
6. A circulation plan, showing existing and proposed
public and private streets, pedestrianways, trials,
and related transportation access or circulation
features required to serve the proposed development.
The circulation plan shall be supported by schematic
designs of principal traffic and circulation improvements,
and such traffic engineering data as required by the
director to demonstrate that existing and proposed
facilities, both within and outside the zone, shall
be adequate to serve land uses proposed by the
Development Plan.
7. A preliminary report and overall plan describing
anticipated requirements and proposed means of
providing utility facilities and public services,
including but not limited to, storm drainage, sewage
disposal, water supply, parks and recreation, and
school facilities.
• 8. An accompanying Development Plan Text setting forth
the basic land use regulations, site development
regulations and performance standards designed to
govern each use area identified by the land use
plan. The text need not incorporate the same level
of detail as found in the regulations for base
zones, but shall be as comprehensive as necessary to
establish basic provisions and regulations which
shall govern subsequent approval of specific tracts
or developments within the Planned Community Zone.
The text shall include, but not be limited to, the
following provisions:
a. A listing of allowable uses within each use
area, including such qualifying descriptions or
definitions and requirements for Conditional
Use Permits as may be applicable.
b. Maximum and minimum regulations, as appropriate
governing residential density, site coverage,
lot size and dimensions, yard requirements,
usable open space, landscaping, and performance
standards.
•
f �/
Ord. 94 le i
Page B
SECTION 7:
SECTION 8:
i,
C. Required yards, landscaping or other site
development regulations to be applicable adjacent
to other zones at the perimeter of the Planned
Community Zone.
d. Supplemental illustrations as required, establishing
the basic architectural character and community
environmental character and community environmental
design qualities to be attained throughout the
Planned Community Zone and within particular
portions of the zone.
9. Such other information, such as a topographic model
In areas of excessive slope, may be required by the
Director of Community Development, the Planning
Commission, or the City Council to permit complete
analysis and appraisal of the development, and to
facilitate adoption of the Planned Community Zone
and the Development Plan by the City Council.
Adoption of Zone and Development Plan
An application for a Planned Community Zone and the
Development Plan submitted with the application shall be
subject to review and approval in the same manner as
prescribed in Section 61.0221 of the San Bernardino
County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
Each Planned Community Zone established shall be indicated
on the Zoning Map by the letter "PC" followed by a reference
number identifying each separate zone. The Development
Plan as modified and approved by the City Council, shall
be considered to be a part of this ordinance, and shall
be identified by reference to the corresponding designation
of each specific Planned Community Zone on the Zoning
Map.
Amendments to Development Plan
A Development Plan may be amended in the same manner as
provided by Section 61.0221 of the San Bernardino County
Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for a change of zone boundaries or for a change
in the regulations applicable with a zone. Amendment of
a Development Plan shall be subject to the same findings
as prescribed for initial enactment of a Planned Community
Zone and adoption of the Development Plan applicable to
the Planned Community Zone.
B. An amendment to a Development Plan may be initiated by
the City Planning Comm ission or the Council, or may be
initiated by the original applicant for the Planned
Community Zone or a successor thereto, provided such
applicant or successor has, at the time of application
for an amendment, a continuing controlling interest in
development or management of uses within the Planned
Community Zone. �11
•
n
•
Ord. 94 1/29/80 kds
Page 9
SECTION 9: Review of Development Progress
• A. The Director of Community Development shall review each
Planned Community Zone annually, and shall submit a
report to the Planning Commission and City Council containing
the following:
A summary of the development status within the zone
and an assessment of progress during the year toward
completion of development authorized by the Development
Plan including adherence to development schedules
and phasing.
2. A statement of any changes in land use and economic
development trends, housing market indicators,
commercial and industrial development rates, or
programs for provision of public facilities and
services which, in the opinion of the Director, vary
significantly from those upon which the Development
Plan were based, and which could affect adversely
continued progress toward completion of development
within the zone.
B. A copy of the annual report of the Director shall be
provided to the applicant and to such other interested
parties or successors as deemed appropriate by the Director.
• Section 10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be
published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in
The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this_ day of
1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Cle
•
6�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• MEMORANDUM
Date: February 6, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Sack Lam, Director of Community Development
Subject: APPEAL OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ISSUES FOR DAVID LANG
BACKGROUND: On January 17, 1980, the Planning Division approved a request
for a Tree Removal Permit, becoming effective January 27, 1980, to remove
twenty -three eucalyptus trees on the south side of Summit Avenue, east of
Etiwanda Avenue (Exhibit "A "). The request was made by David Long as part
of street improvements on Summit Avenue for residential development and
subdivision purposes. The City received appeals from Rodney and Andrea
McWhirter and Kaylynne Mathis stating that the "shade, beauty, and screening"
that is provided by these trees is of value to the neighborhood.
ANALYSIS: Ordinance No. 28 (Subdivisions) contains provisions to conditional
approve subdivisions and subsequent construction that would require full street
• improvements in accordance with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways to be
installed by the developer at his expense. As a condition of approval, David
Long is required to install curbs, gutters, tie -in paving. In addition, Mr.
Long will be required to plant street trees along Summit Avenue as a condition
of approval. The existing eucalyptus trees lie in the path of proposed street
improvements as shown on the attached Exhibit "B ".
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council affirm the decision
of the Community Development Director to approve the request for a Tree Removal
Permit at the above location.
Respectfully sJbmitt/ed,
JACK LAM, Director of
Community Development
JL:DC:nm
Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Tree Removal Permit Application
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
6�1
Plants Pe tye e. l' Pet< TREZ i Rf 0 Al' PLRF It OAPPCICATION
Pro c No h,v °k ci tc mfes.s nF ttwt no p i° the Pre
a tree Rem yj26) °ig11ce oft till ro(20) rncn h,- h[ and of �Y Uon Pr °yat 0, M TO RP co fro
By Permit from °the ity. le el)esw or mo e multi tru'le e
��1'e TION OF SUBJECT APPLICANT: ithout first °r,, dnln8
M,�PNO
NA/IF, 7-E�OP MPLICAMT.
ADDRESS,
TF.LEPNO ROP R
NE 0P P zl, �
ERTY Ot4NER (i F
REASONS FOR REnOV other tt
-G S (attach necessar ra aPP!lcant):
G r�N Y sheets):
PROPOSFS I T11
D OP RFNOV
Pec: r i i,atin T,IC RPvU N.. r'/f
s ati ng athesidisea, �tsi zeE °of all t ekes tOPli cat • jet
=n °f rther diseasre rter, es to sabbe re (hand retai de a plot
CO`ETL� /!y shall be equi ed. a Il eq ed ar design is aced.
TO 13 I. Unction of tilts ,,5�1`. t
Can the tree he Preserved h °n tlrc fn
_ Iln
7. Does clr� Y Pruni ^8: r•i ng crl terii:
r troy..,
rrrnstitnre ,a sirni fi c.
ant oat ur,,I
City:
EXH1817- 4
3S
•
b
RANCHO CPCMiONCA
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION •
Ordinance No. 37, pertaining to the preservation of trees on provate
property, requires that no person remove or relocate any woody
plants in excess of twenty (20) feet in height and having a single
trunk circumference of twenty (20) inches or more and multi - trunks
having a circumference of thirty (30) inches or more (measured
twenty -four (24) inches from ground level), without first obtaining
a Tree Removal Permit from the City.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: /
LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE;
NMIE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT:
/3021 //h' // Z
NNIE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant):
REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary sheets): /yam C&Zff- IL+�
—L u"7 4 Z /LLN7 /U.✓ ee �i/GB m�•1W •
PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL: "e;< 9/7
ADDITIONAL FILING REQUIREMENTS: This application shall include a plot
plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The
species, number, and size of the trees to be removed shall be so designated.
If a tree is diseased, then a written statement from a licensed arborist
stating tl:e nature of the disease shall be required.
TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF:
Evaluation of this application is based on the following criteria:
r
1. Can the tree be preserved by pruning: ill
2. Does the tree constiture a .significant natural resource for the City:
EXHIBIT "A//�
17J
.J
1. General condition of trees: '4at'J
4. Any safety hazards to persons, adjacent property, or utility
installations: A 77
5. Proximity of other trees in the area: &4-e 444,114
6. Effect of tree /emoval on the aesthetics o the rea and the public
health, safety and welfare: _1�<e�a�—
DECES
Evaluated By:
An approval skill not ber,ome of fertfve until after a ten (10) day appeal
pc r lad. 4ntification of approval shill be given to property miners
adjnlaing the snhjoct property. if no appeals are received, then the
permit shall hecome effectivr. ten (10) days from the date of action.
"
EXHINT A'��
x
i
�. I� PoMCE QFO
Y.'1Fts_! i
i
MAP MO. Q
Wj
33'
zz //
EXH►81T t�I
CLWST/IUCT/ON NOTES
•
•
.1
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 39 -A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NUMBER 39 PERTAINING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL REGULATIONS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
Ordinance No. 39 is herebv Amended as follows:
Section 9.5 Requlation of Operation of Motor Vehicles
No person shall drive a motor vehicle on any lands
belonging to or occupied by another, without having,
and upon request of a peace officer, displaying
written permission from the owner of such lands or his
agent, or the person in lawful possession thereof;
provided however, that this section shall not be applicable
to persons having visible or lawful business with said
owner, agent or person in lawful possession."
'Section 12.12. Use of Streets for Storage of
Vehicles Prohibited.
(a) No person who owns or has possession, custody or
control of any vehicle shall park such vehicle upon
any street or alley for more than a consecutive period
of seventy -two (72) hours.
(b) In the event a vehicle is parked or left standing
upon a street in excess of a consecutive period of
seventy -two (72) hours, the Sheriff or any member of
the Highway Patrol of the State of California may remove
said vehicle from the street in the manner and subject
to the requirements of the Vehicle Code."
Section 2. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published
within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper
of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of 1980.
• ATTEST:
City Clerk
I
it
5F,
Mayor
C7
February 6, 1980
TO: Mayor and Members of City Council
FROM: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT ON THE DEANNEXATION OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY FROM
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO THE CITY OF ONTARIO
As the City Council is aware, the cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario
have been negotiating to deannex a small parcel from Rancho Cucamonga
and annex the parcel to the City of Ontario. The primary reason for the
• change in city boundaries is that the property can best be served by the
City of Ontario. In an annexation a redistribution of property tax
revenues is required.
Assembly Bill 8, which was enacted in the last legislative session, requires
that the cities involved in the annexation agree on the redistribution of
property tax revenue. The proposed annexation, if approved by the local
Agency Formation Commission, will result in a shift of approximately $46
in city tax revenue from our community to the City of Ontario. In addition,
$114, which is currently received by the Foothill Fire District will be
shifted to the City of Ontario.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council concur in the
distribution of property tax revenues in relation to proposed LAFC
Annexation No. 1921 by adopting Resolution No. 80 -9, "A Resolution of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga Agreeing to the Apportionment of Property
Tax in Annexation No. 156."
LW /vz
•
�y
QRESOLUTION NO. 80 -9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AGREEING TO THE APPORTIONMENT
OF PROPERTY TAX IN ANNEXATION NO. 156
WHEREAS, Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides
that no annexation shall become effective until each governmental entity
whose service areas or service responsibilities would be altered by such
jurisdictional change agrees, by resolution, to accept the negotiated
exchange of property tax revenues; and
WHEREAS, the cities of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga have nego-
tiated an agreement for the exchange of property tax revenues for that
property known as Annexation No. 156.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city
of Rancho Cucamonga that the apportionment f property tax in annexed
areas between the City of Ontario and the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
as shown in Exhibit "A ", is hereby approved.
• PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1980.
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman
City Clerk
James C. Frost
Mayor
\J
E
EXHIBIT "A"
DEANNEX FROM RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ANNEX TO ONTARIO
LAFC $1921
Tax Rate Area #15013 AV $26,772
Agency B of Taxes Collected Tax Revenue
Schools
Cucamonga Elementary
15.9
$ 171
Chaffey High
22.6
242
Chaffey Community College
3.9
41
County School Svc. Inst. Educ.
.4
4
High School Tuition
.05
Unapp. Taxes Equal. Aid
.06
1
Total
42.8
459
Other Unaffected Agencies
Chino Basin Municipal Water
1.5
16
Chino Basin Water Imp C
2.9
32
Chino Basin Water Conservation
.4
5
W. End Mira Loma soil Conservation
.04
County
37.3
398
Total
42,
-4-5T
Transferred Agencies
City of Rancho Cucamonga
4.3
46
Foothill Fire
"10.7
114
Total
f5,0
6-0
Grand Total
100
$ 1,070
C� �
DEANNEX FROM RANCHO CUCAMONGA
- ANNEX TO ONTARIO
LAFC 91921
Agency
Schools
Ontario Elementary - General
Chaffey Jr. College - General
County School Services -Inst. Educ
High School Tuition
Unapp. Taxes Equal. Aid
Total
Other Unaffected Agencies
Chino Basin Municipal Water
Chino Basin Water Imp C
Chino Basin Water Cons.
W. End Mira Loma Soil Cons.
County
Total
City of Ontario
Grand Total
10
Ontario
Tax Rate Area 4000
% Taxes Collected
21.4
4.6
.4
.05
.07
Pd7F7
2.1
3.5
.5
.05
41.2
47.3
26.2
100.0
RECEIVED
JAN 181979
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
u
•
0
_ 3
7 l y ORTION CLI AMONGA FRUI LANDS M.B. 4/9
I
P.D. EIGHTH 5T- Cucamonga Creek Flood
Control Channel
r 41 I .•••••• Existing City Limits
C /I
- I ® Proposed Annexation
_ I
l Lot 23
�I FIFTH s:; >, - - - - - --
PARCEL I
G - �
> _ 3 Lot 26. a
East >s ¢ ' \b w
- " Lot 14 te�a•• I --- �' ".._.. ''nn
n P.O.B. z G /
SIXTH \I ME ..
5T.
Z
ZP.O.B. I •�;.
.�• .FOURTH ,r�oono .. _�Q
PARCEL 2 '
-
.PARCEL 3 Q
_ - --
- ONTARIO
-legend
I °•T�`s.c.nnll 'LOCATION:
�...''s: W _• tV1AP' -- Rf0RGANi ATION TO IN=E
n�ORTrl .
A NE N06 TO THE GtTY�
OF ONTARIO AND Dt7AC14MENT1
1
SCALE
• s y I': 400 FROM THE CITY of RANCHO
GUCAMONGA s
b lP FILE
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1980
TO: City Council & City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: ZONE 1 STORM DRAIN COMMITTEE
On January 17, 1980, the Zone 1 Flood Control Advisory Committee met for its
annual pre- budget hearing. At this meeting, the Flood Control Engineer
explained the Zone revenue picture and the Zone Cities submitted projects for
funding.
Due to the major commitment to the Cucamonga Channel, the Zone is facing a
$900,000 deficit for the coming fiscal year. No money is, therefore, available
for City projects.
In response to this situation, the major thrust of the City presentations were
to promote an agressive search to alternative sources of funding. The Committee
discussed the possibility of.a Zone wide bond issue. In order to facilitate this
• process, it was recommended that each City Engineer take information to their
Council to affirm interest in such a bond issue and to ask that one representative
be assigned to a Committee to further explore alternative funding sources. The
City Engineers for each City would form a Technical Committee to advise the
Policy Committee.
It is the staffs opinion that this effort will be work while as a first step
in taking a positive approach to dealing with the West Valley flood problems.
It is recommended that the City Council support the concept of exploring
alternative funding nechanisms for the construction of storm drains and to
appoint a member to sit on a Committee to review the developed alternatives.
Respectfully sub itted,
L1 B, Hubbs
C1 Engineer
LBH:deb
WA
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 6, 1980 1
To: City Council and City Manager
t
From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
Subject: RURAL ROADS - Street development standards for landlocked
parcels
ABSTRACT: There has been considerable discussion by the Planning Commission
over when street improvements should be required, the extent of those improve-
ments, whether or not they should be required, whether there should be access
to a public street, access for landlocked parcels, etc. At a resent City
Council meeting, the issue of access to landlocked parcels was raised (Bonneville).
Action on this item was deferred in order to prepare a report. The staff mem-
ber who is assigned to prepare this report has left the City for another job
opportunity. Therefore, the report is not complete. However, there are parti-
cular pressing issues that must be addressed now - specifically street improve-
. ments and access for landlocked parcels.
He have attached a brief report discussing the issue and the Ordinances that
apply to them.
LANDLOCKED PARCELS
`J
INTRODUCTION
Prior to incorporation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the County of San
Bernardino controlled the subdivision of land. Subdivision of 4 or less lots
were done through a Minor Subdivision procedure, which allowed a property owner
to divide land without the help of a Licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer.
Additionally, the County did not require dedicated, or in many cases, improved
access to the parcels that were created. As a result, the City was left with
solving the problem of adequate access to these parcels at the time of development.
BACKGROUND
City Ordinance No. 58 requires street improvements to the centerline of the street
between the boundaries of the property (See attached). The Uniform Building Code
requires that all buildings shall have access to a public space; i.e. dedicated
road (See attached). The problem that arises in many vacant or undeveloped lots
within the Etiwanda and Alta Loma area that are landlocked; i.e. they do not have
dedicated and improved access to a public road.
THE REPORT
This report will focus on the owner /builder of a single family home on a single
lot. It does not consider any subdivision of land. In order to more clearly
understand the situation, we pose the following hypothetical situation: •
Owner /Builder "X" owns a piece of property 7 acres in size. The
property enjoys access from a 20' wide unimproved, graded, path
across another owners property. Owner /Builder "X" wishes to con-
struct one single family home on his 7 acres. Please note there
is no subdivision contemplated, only the construction of a single
family home.
When the City issues a building permit we assume certain responsibility. The
issuance of a building permit assumes that 1) the builder will conform to the
adopted codes of the City; and 2) that the adopted codes of the City protect the
health, safety and public welfare. Presently for the City to issue a building
permit for Owner /Builder "X ", he most improve and dedicate access consistent
with our code. In some cases, the cost of the improvements would exceed the
cost of the development therefore making the project infeasible. In other
cases, the improvements would he over land not controlled by Owner /Builder and
in still other cases the present need for improvements and dedication may not be
warranted.
We het love that (here are other options that should he Investigated to provide
mininmm aece:;.s for the property. We suggest that:
The owner /builder most provide proof of legal access to the property
In the form of a grant deed or in the form of a recorded easement.
2. The owucr /huildor must provide the Citv will' All irrovocnhle offer of •
dedication on his portion of that access for street purposes.
landlocked Parcels
Page 2
• 3. The owner /builder provide a lien agreement between the owner of the
property and the City whereby that owner, or future owners of the
property, agree to improve the access across his property at the time
that the City determines it is warranted and that he pay for and pro-
vide the plans for, those improvements at the time that development is
requested.
4. This procedure is allowed only for an owner /builder of one dwelling
unit where there is no subdivision of land.
There is a basic difference between an Owner /Builder and a Developer. The Owner/
Builder has a piece of property on which he wishes to develop a single family home;
no subdivision being necessary. The Developer has a piece of property which he
wishes to subdivide and sell lots for development by himself or others for the
purpose of profiting from that sale. In the latter case, we feel that it is man-
datory that we require that the street improvements be put in at that time. In
the case of the Owner /Builder there will be the opportunity in the hypothetical
case and in reality to attain street improvements through future subdivision.
The City Council has two options regarding landlocked parcels:
Option 1: Leave as is; i.e. requiring dedicated and improved access from a
public street to the landlocked parcel; or
Option 2: Require the Owner /Builder to provide: 1) proof of legal access either
• through grant deed or recorded document; 2) an irrevocable offer of dedication for
the property that the owner has ability to dedicate; 3) a lien agreement prepared
by the Owner /Builder that allows the City to require development of the street at
the appropriate time to be paid for by the current property owner; and 4) allowed
only for Owner /Builder of one single dwelling unit on one single parcel of land.
The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 80 -01 approving Option 82 and
recommended that the City Council concur with Resolution No. 80 -01 and direct
staff to prepare the necessary ordinance changes.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends concurrence with Resolution
No. 80 -01 and recommends that the City Council direct Staff to prepare the
necessary ordinance changes.
.___IpectfwLly submitted,
U
1
I
SACK LAM, Director of
Community Development
JL: BKH:nm
Attachment: Planning Commission Resolution No. 80 -01
Ordinance No. 58
Ordinance No. 58 -A
�7
����1vt Qon, �(SS,4nf�
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -01
• A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COIMtISSION
ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENT FOR ACCESS TO LANDLOCKED PARCELS
WHERE NO SUBDIVISION OCCURS
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council has requested that the Planning
Commission investigate the access necessary for landlocked parcels: and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish guidelines for access to land-
locked parcels.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
does hereby establish the following requirements for landlocked parcels where
no subdivision is occurring:
1. The owner /builder must provide proof of legal access to the property
in the form of a grant deed or in the form of a recorded easement.
2. The owner /builder must provide the City with an irrevocable offer of
dedication on his portion of that access for street purposes.
3. The owner /builder provide a lien agreement between the owner of the
property and the City whereby that owner, or future owners of the property,
• agree to improve the access across his property at the time that the City
determines it is warranted and that he pay for and Provide the plans for,
those improvements at the time chat development is requested.
4. This procedure is allowed - only _ for an owner /builder of one dwelling unit
where there is no subdivision of land.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 1980.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: tH?eCm t
n empel, C irmai#-
I
Secrr. tart' of the Planning Commission
- I, JACK LAM, Sucretary of the Planning Commission of the Citv of Rancho Cuca-
mnnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day
- of January, 1980, by the following vote to -wit:
• AYES# CO>PI I SS IoNERS A JONES, GARC,IA, TOLSTOY, DAHL , RFMPEL
NOESi CO ?QMISSIONFRSt BONE
ABSENT# COMMISSIONE•RSi NONE
•
AN ORDINANCE. OF THE CM COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING RI OUIR1'.PIENI'S FUR
DEDICATION' OF RICIIT -OF -WAY AND FOR CONSIRUC'iIO1 OF PUBLIC
RICIIT -OF -WAY• IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION.
The City Council of the City of Parent, Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTIO:' 1: Lack of Improvements Hazardous.
The lack of full frontage improvements adjoining
a lot or parcel occupied or to be occupied by a building, structure or
parking lot is herel•y found and declared to be hazardous for pedestrians
and vehicular traffic and detrimental to the health, safety and general
welfare of the residents of the City.
SECTION 2: Streets and Highways - Dedication Required.
No building or structure shall be erected,
enlarged or altered and no property shall hereafter be improved for
parking purposes, and no building permit sliall be issued therefor,
unless one -half (112) of the street, which is located on the same side
of the center line of the street as, such lot, has dedicated right -of -way
for the full width of the lot along all street frontages so as to meet
the Plaster Plan and /or Standards for such street. In addition to required
dedication for street purposes, additinnal dedication for storm drain,
sewer, water or other utility purposes nay also he required in connection
with building perm its where such dedication is necessary to prevent the
flooding of adjacent or nearby properties or to permit connection to
required utilities.
SECTION_i: In the event construction of full frontage im-
provements is not immediately required, any person required to dedicate
land by this section shall make an irrevocable offer to dedicate property,
executed by all parties having an interest in the property including
beneficiaries and trustees of deeds of trust as shown by a current
preliminary title report prepared by a title company approved by the
City Engineer. Such offer of dedication shall he in a farm approved by
the City Attorney told the City Engineer, end shall continue in effect
until the City Council accepts or rejects such offer.
SECTION Construction of Public Improvements - PP.q,Ired
CenrrnllV.
Any porsnn, owner, lessne, or spent constructing
or arranging Tot the c.onr.tructinn of ally parking lot or cnmmer'cial,
residential or iudustrlal building, or building::, or building addition
of alteration, slioll pt'ovidr for Ilse ronstruetiun or inv Lnl !anion to
City Standards, of sidewalks, curbs, gutter::, street trees, street
lighting, street paving in the ( cut Cr lint of line street, and necessary
drainago strueturos unless such improvements already exist nlonit all
street frontages adjoining the lot an which the buildin6 or patkittg lot
Is to be constructed, onlarl;vd or altered.
SECTION 5: P_xt.rpt inn_:.
(a) A single-family residonre where tine square / C
foot area of such addition: dots not exceed fifty pvtcent (505;) of the l\.Sni /7
area of the residential poitJon of the buildings existing prior to
addition.
(h) A single- family residonce 11,11 the value
of the proposed alterations does not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the �•
value of the building being altered prior to its alteration.
(c) Construction of or additions to garages, rr`
carports, storage buildings and similar non- residential buildings,
accessory to single- family residences where such construction or addition
does not exceed five hundred (500) square feet in area.
SECTION 6: Construction of Public Improvements - Proreguis-
ice to Approval of the Building official.
Except as provided in Section 5, the Building
Official shall deny issuance of a building permit, or deny approval for
occupancy or deny final approval and acceptance for public utility
connections to any building or parking lot until required full frontage
improvements exist, or are.. constructed or their construction is guaranteed
by an executed agreement and cash money deposited with the City in a sum
approved by the City Engineer based upon one- and - one -half (1 -1i2) times
the estimated cost of construction.
SECTION 7: Construction Agreement.
The construction guarantee agreement shall be
effective on the date of the deposit of cash and shall end upon the dace
of completion to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of all improvements
required to be made. Upon completion of the improvements and their
acceptance by the City, the cash deposit shall be returned to the owner.
The City is authorized, in the event of any default, to use any or all
of the deposit money to cause all of the required work to he done or
completed, and for payment of all costs and expenses therefore. Any •
money remaining shall be refunded to the owner.
SECTION 8: City Standards.
l
The City Engineer is authorized to establish
standards for the construction and installation of sidewalks, curbs,
gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving and storm drain
structures.
SECTION 9: No Encroachment Without Permit.
No building, structure or parking lot shall be
erected, enlarged or altered if it does, or would, encroach upon any
public easement or right -of -way unless an encroachment permit is first
obtained from the City Engineer. The City Engineer may grant an encroachment
permit if tics determiner that the encroachment will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety or welfare.
SECTION 10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordivanre and the
City Clerk shall attost to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause tite
same to be published within fiftOCn (15) Jay, after its pnssnge, at
least once In 'rile Daily. Rvpnrt, a newspapor of genrrril circulation,
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
(6
•
1979. PASSED, AFIBOVEII, and ADOPTED th . is Ist d.iy of Feh ncvy,
• AYES: Frost, Mikcls, Palomhu, W,.;;t, Schlas: ;cr
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Pu u
ATTEST:
~� l
T
u
0
AN ORDINANCE (IF Till: CITY COUNCIL OF 1'11E CITY OF RANCHO
CL'CUIONCA, C\LIVORNIA, AlIISNDINC ORDINANCE ;10. 58 17STABLISII-
1-C Ii IIQIIIREMENTS FOR DEDICATION OF RICIIT -OF -WAY V1 CON-
JUNCTION 141111 6UTIMINC, CONSIMIC'I loN.
The City Council of Cho City of Ra nr.ho Cucmm�ngn, California,
does ordain as fo lluws:
follows: SECTION 1: Ordinance No. 53 shall he amended to read as
Section 5: Exceptions
The provisions of Section 4 shall not apply to:
(a) Alterations;
(b) Reconstruction;
(c) an addition to a single family residence when the addition
does not exceed 650 square feet in area;
(d) construction of garages, carports, storage buildings,
patio covers, swimming pools, spas, and similar structures,
accessory to a single family residence.
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at
least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation
published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
i PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED his 6th day of June, 1979.
AYES: Palombo, Schlosser, Mikels, Bridge, Frost
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
7�
'����� ^r G:F. :.i�^ +a`i,': ;.y..''Lig'n. 0'i ' A , I,'; ,•.i :.'. i v, wN
1976 EDITION
500 504
•
C ._3
49
j�
�L
d.
i.Ji.
I
I —1
r
I
0, A 'ane-hour Fire,resislive Occupancy Separation" shall be of not
.;
lees than one,huur fir -rmstive roes( ruo ion. .Xll openings in such sepnrm
''++••,
Zion shall he protected by afire assembly haling a onNunu fireprolation
,.
rating.
(J) Fire Ratings far Occupancy Separalions.0cenpancy separations
_
I'" /'_' '•'•
`
shall be prosidtd betucen the Nations Groups and Divisions of Occupant
ie'jke
•'
cies as set forth in Table No. S-B.
"i1. 'a "'
EXCEPTIONS: 1. t \'here an approved sore, hanh constmueJ In x
nndanet v.hh tlm Irirc Code is milliner, amd, Kmh need not he ,,TaremJ
none er her (lrmnp II (A.Irran.la, or frem t irorn +IS Menpa roc•
p' •. ,
1. hl Gnntpf A. Ilia ision I, E aiiJ 11 X'mlpanc ci a three tenor a,Ln,lica7
•� :,
is Mlmiit, from, Groun A.Dia i•ionl( ICauraneS U-6110 xa
;i�j:vf
,. r•
inlru,(In
aaragt fm Itlf palhinp M minor hmme a of ant
,h,A,rt
udincq
m'ne dl an Nne i id,d to, tepee o11u111 Plc i. dom•,
It. Milton ton<Mlhllcdplm
one11 l
a one,
R, Ihaision I tkeapats
1. In ❑ed
I O,
icon Ocaopam. r'sal eels as a n
II a Chet, li used d otfl, a.a. noatj
is ea't.nWie
of mile kh
of p mou+t.ehulo having a caouein of nut mm�•
Ihe padlne ofer
the
t and ProalJnl nn repair nr fueling is Jnne and the
area paeans Mr %chi a
•
v od 11
ante d'+<s nn, tNeefJ Ap0 ryuam fell in a hmlJlnp.
a. In Ihr one Kau oecupancy ,spatanon bemeco a (!loop R, Dnl,ioo J
and \1 (kenrana) . the wpar:ninn ni.is he contact h' the mmall mon of
n.lw'W,appmseJ fm photo Ioe..... list tonsuucuon nn thevaolgaetde
•• 1'
'•p`
and I +elLelnm'g. Iglu Woo, AJ sun +J door I'; hd,t, ,, Jae Ana„ 11It
-
Pircd.mmcra dl Jlinm Fain one
lb, 'Pennitt of a oar tact a
•'
ter dol
L. ynrtrd ml Joe.. pte le lhn`ta9ranpn for Jaeb con,un<,ed It ton to „Iha..
u,l, IN,
•_ —.. �
No :h peugt pihaniaa•,I mcA
5 I be whosung a,i,.m to need Plot be ,parwd fun, the u,e, 11 nlmh
Ihq era• .....mvs....eembit n•onn h, sing a Mot area al nm a, a, '11)
prime larl::ulnunruxue, and doieal olhae..InJ,i nl... I...nn,.droll mI ha•
aeg'cgin, Jo Ilea exceed 25 mtcetn of dm Pilot arva o1 Ihr m.nul u,e xhrn
not related In tirnur It. Ois Plum l and tironp 11, Ito won 2 (XCnpms ic,
Location on Property
acta to a h li,
Sec. 504. (a) General. Buildings shall adjoin of haw c>x
a
space. 1.111, r Intel on nut c„ one , nuea l e
.
�:*'AIR �t >e a :.`T.:'�
�•'
perwancnl y mmntmne .
•a'•'�'''s
vs. ` -! : • a ^
Pot the putpose of this Section, the center title of an adjoining street or
...
alleyd hall line.
%cenlinireedan,,,,% slnplbperry
Paw,... tr rttlnirnl xinJosss droll hr Pal la,s than 10 inches from the
side aoslI .,, prop,, IN Into, Im f,INpnvC Se, lion 1710,
11.1 lire It"W"we of 1 \alh. PNleriol x.tit, ,hall h.ne li c tokitinae
and opcuulg proreelum n 't Tnnh In I eF!: Ni, 5 N. fart 111. It'd I, a;.
IvrJ n.,.: wnh r:.h aJJnt�nal m':.I „en• at J!c ,al , nn to 1,- 1'• 1 t-
it .Jai l:ah', ahi t.
--� enc line The abnst prm pion, .11.111 nn, appl, la 1.111, at Dahl auglc, ,n
:n ^Kwr
J. <7,.
the l'mptl 15 fin,
prllfa'Ituit, b,n11d l Nhall beyond:
+: .''tt /,t i�..a
tit, exalter all not e11end
,
I A pamI hoc Iratit Ilie dm nice la the pl tiller ly I le It 011i an a let ior
ss,Jl. nt
•
C ._3
49
j�
�L
d.
i.Ji.
I
I —1
r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• MEMORANDUM
Date: February 6, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Jack I=, Director of Community Development
Subject: STREET NAMING - Request by the Planning Commission for the City
Council to determine a process for street naming within the City
of Rancho Cucamonga
ABSTRACT: At the last Planning Commission meeting, Staff was directed to
send a report to the City Council on the issue of street naming for the
City. As you will recall, there has been much discussion over the street
names proposed for the North Town Area, and this has raised the question
of how streets get named and who should game them.
In some cities street naming is done by a Staff Committee. Generally this
is composed of the Fire Department, the Police Department and the Building
• Department. Specific guidelines are set forth as to when a street is called
a Court, when a cul -de -sac is called a Circle, whether through streets
should be named Street or Avenue, or Highway or Road, etc. There are also
specific standards as to what north /south streets should be called, whether
they should be named after gems, or trees, or plants, or famous people, or
if the names should be in Spanish, or English, or French, and many other cri-
teria. In other cities street naming is done by a single individual and in
still other cities it is done by a Council /Commission /Staff Committee.
We suggest that if street naming is a concern of the Council, that Staff be
directed to prepare a Street Naming Ordinance that will be reviewed by the
Planning Commission and adopted by the City Council. This process will give
the Planning Commission an opportunity to input into the process and make
their suggestions for changes or additions to the Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council direct Staff to pre-
pare an Ordinance for street naming and solicit the Planning Commissions' comments
on said Ordinance.
Respectfully ubmitted,
1
tI J
JACK i.A.M, Dhe - --"�"
Community Development
• JL:BKH:nm
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
M410RANDUM
Date: February 6, 1980
To: City Manager and City Council
From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
Subject: REVERSION OF ACREAGE OF TRACT NO. 9399 AND TRACT NO. 9400 -
North side of Banyan, west of Beryl
Tract No. 9399 and Tract 9400 were approved by the County in 1977. No
action has been taken to construct on the tracts to date and the original
improvement agreements have been in default since September, 1979. Much
communication has occurred between staff and the current owners of the
tracts to post new bonds and develop a new improvement agreement or have
the two maps "revert back to acreage" (wiping the slate clean). A letter
was sent from our City Attorney to the holders of the maps stating that
unless the requisite bonds and agreements are submitted for the February
• 6th meeting of the City Council for acceptance, that action will be taken
to revert to acreage. No bonds nor agreements have been submitted for approval.
Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council, upon its own motion,
initiate the process of reversion to acreage as stipulated in the Subdivision
Map Act and set February 20th as a date for a public hearing to be held on
the proposed reversion to acreage. If the City Council initiates the process
it would mean that the owners of the two tracts must decide one way or another, and
unless the bonds and agreement are submitted in time for the meeting of
February 20th, the Council can decide at that meeting to eliminate the two
tract maps. Staff feels that the City has been quite fair in its interface
with the owners since it has been five months since the agreements have been
in default.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council make a motion to
initiate the reversion to acreage for Tracts 9400 and 9399 and set February
20th as the public hearing for said reversion.
Re ec tfu ly ubmitted,
JACK LAN, Director of
Community Development
JL: nm
IN THE UkINCORP7pATED TERPIfORY OF �IIE COUNTY (Y i4N EERNARDINO
er'•r� a:�envs_w nf. Y fM .E CO NTY • LAV!w]n
N^v /S• /aD 1M0 ✓aL•JN aG FF4 A
D[GS Dl. WL{O .a R 8 c
W 4Gx t[ae:xp 9:u : -1Li+1
DYVID L. wplDfN, pV¢ ENSrNffR VOV[ +'pfF ,q)G.
NOTES
[ ° hpCa-[55![f•irtani:: ••;C PSO:'V,LI:S v'•:l4r,l xetlD
♦ � RO:a, `S ^P t':r nay[. v e Ana -;• N.['a' <a Ht:. ..rt: t -AU:!
1. . "-T .' - >J !,naR '. .- a •rGG �'• -G $rq ac alCyOC; au[K
q :a.:lJ'[C! iK': a[� ;a- 'a- !u'[ff 'iK"t•a -C' -J
CUaD 0.• :aa- rlOSh_ p]J C {4r {.af]
\ O y rit4 I•MGnY I'.tJin°JM t�SCCn,IO� [O[ry�fS r' ,LOCV^L
G 1xR •a.Cr +aG iT .Orl
1 •]Q:G AIa ft;Iti rttra[LD DI _ {V'W. )x_LN, 1C L -•�lLl
7 SECLf I'IW:Alf]Si. "fiiWwW C•a17(Y Dg V'LY.!`Jr�,fNINI
C.Vi
ii, �10Cn 14
�\l oe•e 1 :• �lifT !�
M rHF.vv
I:
[
j
I•
V\
•� l-'
I t
a'e•aa
if r•
SIRFET
C.Vi
ii, �10Cn 14
�\l oe•e 1 :• �lifT !�
BASIS OF BEARIttGS
PT ^ roS 6.Sw ••blCN ue DKlo px
' -t :o.-CC r! yA+4l ry eth!(1 NINJ
•. [+•" 'D'[' rS !i'J'e[l M T \M[ NO 1>aD
! w
a
�\l oe•e 1 :• �lifT !�
7�
en et
�
a'e•aa
if r•
SIRFET
T
_
n {1�'
I
Z •�
••
II
N .i
rc : n n°Grvm xavf
>O'
LLx l.'
.p'v ee t
IS I[_3[ OC4 i
�c
2
'LJrrh
Y•11, .•! 1,111!
R
1 :vin
L
;i
I
•
• I!
7�
en et
�
a'e•aa
if r•
SIRFET
tl
a�
1
' IN T'+E TERRCCRI' OF THE COLNTY Of SAN 9ERNARODM
r s io'y'.�:ii,iiac.� ti'c +« eiawiwn.:c c'cwlvr vine
a :x:aca «y
i:•.
D&WV a «W"090 CIVMEM6r «eeR NOVEM&SK'1c 7i.
OT_n? BASIS OF BEARINGS
• • \- ":e rx: .- i„! oS ea.,.,i ' -:•:vY :•<[fM .K pY5lD ba
O M1^ •: J` n:1 \:'!D t -!
•.N•]: v[ O Y.N•/.n SiR[!T b[MO
• .' rsi' .i<,� _ ,.e > /••a:•.., -_. •,\( '� ve er [ • .e sv+w p«n•e[wa•tA
• f•C -n s ^f: :�,: •.1 [!a[i.'Ca:!ll NO 4'i1p
• -. �_ L i.Ci
1 i ^°La•. L, NN A[•.•l ?: D• �. o x ^FV.6!_i •- ,Q�'.:fl
i1 •11Y ..
'na
a.
Yy
2
1} ✓( T
.� yr
uo •6ANYANT:?
v, . •!�'Yj'CPf� ry'
;J,I,iti
Y• 1 I =
raf.HlwK
•1.H. •..•gW[.^a••p ulY(M
1 �
''L•
9
(1 I f
I��
1L lq'
•
\.S•_• '..tom •.�••.
r.xn'
-
^...." .wj_S�lao �.v.�
i
°
1 S:
IO
it ti
r�
air
I�
i,
:�'. � ate• �:�r
Iifr:f..\ 1' %��'-
'na
a.
Yy
2
1} ✓( T
.� yr
uo •6ANYANT:?
v, . •!�'Yj'CPf� ry'
;J,I,iti
Y• 1 I =
nY •m'rdH'
1 �
''L•
9
(1 I f
1L lq'
•
T I n
I
' Lx
i
°
1 S:
IO
air
I�
'na
a.
Yy
2
1} ✓( T
.� yr
uo •6ANYANT:?
v, . •!�'Yj'CPf� ry'
;J,I,iti
Y• 1 I =
1 �
(1 I f
1L lq'
T I n
I
' Lx
I• u
Ir
LIE
Ly
A C1
f
�•a ^: •la •a tw
.. •l . :'.
0 RESOLUTION NO. 80- 8
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING THE
COMPENSATION FOR ELECTION OFFICIALS.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has called a municipal
election for the 8th day of April, 1980, and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Ccuamonga is required to supply help at the
main Counting Center at Upland City Nall the evening of the election, and
WHEREAS, there are numerous other tasks that may require help on election
day, and
WHEREAS, a fee has already been established to reimburse Precinct Officials,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does fix the compensation for each Election Official as designated by
the City Clerk at the sum of $30.00 for said election.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of , 1980-
James C. Frost
Mayor
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman
City Clerk
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1980
TO: City Council & City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Tract Number 9583
The subject tract was approved by San Bernardino County on December 16, 1976.
Due to the moratorium and vaious other time extensions, the tract expiration
date is February 1981. The tract is located east of Haven Avenue at Hillside
Road and consists of 49 lots. The developer, Deer Creek Company, has prepared
the plans and documents for compliance with the conditions of approval and
requests recording of the subject tract map.
The developer has supplied the Engineering Division with an Agreement and
securities, sufficient in nature to insure orderly development. The type
and amounts are as follows:
Performance Bond, (Road) $440,000
Labor & Material (Road) $440,000
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution directing
the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City Council
and the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf
of the City, The City Engineer shall forward the map for recording.
Respectfully submitted,
Llo B. Hubbs
City Engineer
L8H /ctr
TM IL
r�T
1
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -14F
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9583
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 9583, consisting of 49
lots, submitted by the Deer Creek Company, Subdivider, located on the
east side of Haven Avenue at Hillside Road has been submitted to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City
as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and
in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City;
and
WHEREAS, the meet the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered
the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution
by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security,
and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for
public use the streets and easements delineated thereon:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said
City, the Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and,
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject of approval as to form and content thereof by the City
Attorney; and,
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating
same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute
the certificate thereon on behalf of said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of 1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
-pity Clerk
NOTICE of HEAR TG
Notice is hereby given that the LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COtM1ISSION of San Bernardino _._.
County will hold a public hearing: C
Wednesday, February 13, 1980 Ca C
1111 East Mill Street, Bldg. 1
Hearing Chambers, First Floor
San Bernardino, California 92415
to hear the following:
9:00 A.M.
WORKSHOP SESSION - Island Annexations
REGULAR MEETING -'CALL TO ORDER - FLAG SALUTE
Approve Minutes of Regular meeting of January 9, 1980
1. Adoption of Resolution for LAFC 1971 - City of Loma Linda Annexation
2. Adoption of Resolution for LAFC 1138D - City of Chino Sphere of
Influence Review
1, 3. `_ Presentation of the Fire Protection Study for the Valley Area
4. PLANNING PRESENTATION: Community Plans for Joshua Tree, Morongo Valley,
and Yucca Valley '
Anyone wishing to give testimony of the above regularly scheduled items should notify
the LAFC Office at the above address by 5 p.m. the day prior to the hearing at
(383 - 2611).
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COIMIISSION
LARRY H. HENDON, Staff Director
BY: CECILIA LOPEZ
Secretary to the Commission
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1980
TO: City Council & City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: BASE LINE RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION
Attached for Council approval are resolutions establishing value and accepting
donations of right of way for two parcels of land located on the south side
of Base Line between Beryl and Lion. This right of way is required for the
widening of Base Line through this area.
Property values for the land were based on the recent appraisal of rights of
way at the intersection of Hellman and Base Line and was set at $1.95 per
square foot. The values established are for use by the property owners
for tax purposes.
In addition to the right of way valuation, Resolution No. 80 -13 includes an
in -lieu payment of $1,750 for the construction of a fence along Base Line
through the Massar property frontage. This payment can only be used for
the construction of the fence. The valuation was based on competitive bid.
The property owner feels that he can obtain the fence more cheaply than
the City and will be able to complete fencing on Beryl with these funds.
Experience with bid procedures for this type of work indicate that this is
true.
RECOMMENDATION:'
It is recommended that the Council approve Resolutions No. 80 -12 and 80 -13
accepting donations of right of way, establishing market value thereof and
authorizing in in -lieu payment of $1,750 for fence construction.
Respectfully submit ed,
Lloyf . Hubbs
City,, ngmeer
LBH:deb
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DONATION
OF PROPERTY IN FEE AND DETERMINING THE FAIR
MARKET VALUATION THEREOF.
WHEREAS, ALFRED J. PAYMENT and MARILYN J. PAYMENT are
the owners of the following real property situated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
The North 12.50 feet of the East
133.00 feet of Lot 10, Map of
Subdivision "C" Cucamonga Vineyard
Tract, as recorded in Book 21, Page
67 of Maps, in the Office of the
County Recorder of said County;
and,
WHEREAS, ALFRED J. PAYMENT and MARILYN J. PAYMENT have
offered to donate the subject property to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, in fee, for street and related pur-
poses in conjunction with the proposed widening of Baseline
Road;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUN-
CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
hereby accepts the donation of the real property hereinabove
described, in fee, for street and related purposes in con-
junction with the proposed widening of Baseline Road.
SECTION 2: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
hereby determines the fair market valuation of the subject
property to be the sum of $3,241.00.
SECTION 3: The City Clerk is authorized and directed
to prepare all conveyances and other instruments necessary
to effectuate the exchange of land, and the same shall be
signed by the City Clerk as to acceptance on behalf of the
City. The City Clerk is authorized and instructed to accept
and record in the Office of the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County, California, a Grant Deed in favor of the
City with respect to said real property hereinabove described.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
-1-
1980.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-z-
p 7
Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. an_ia
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DONATION
OF PROPERTY IN FEE, DETERMINING THE FAIR MARKET
VALUATION THEREOF, AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT IN
LIEU OF REMOVING AND RECONSTRUCTING A FENCE
THEREON.
WHEREAS, THOMAS J. MASSAR and DELORES J. MASSAR are the
owners of the following real property situated in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Parcel 1 - That portion of the West
197.00 feet of the East 330.00 feet
of Lot 10, Map of Subdivision "C"
Cucamonga Vineyard Tract, as recorded
in Book 21, Page 67 of Maps, in the
Office of the County Recorder of said
County, lying North of a line parallel
with and distant South 12.50 feet from
the North line of said Lot 10;
and,
WHEREAS, THOMAS J. MASSAR and DELORES J. MASSAR have
offered to donate the subject property to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, in fee, for street and related pur-
poses in conjunction with the proposed widening of Baseline
Road;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUN-
CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
hereby accepts the donation of the real property hereinabove
described, in fee, for street and related purposes in con-
junction with the proposed widening of Baseline Road.
SECTION 2: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
hereby determines the fair market valuation of the subject
property to be the sum of $4,802.00.
SECTION 3: Payment to THOMAS J. MASSAR and DELORES J.
MASSAR in the sum of $1,750.00 is hereby authorized and or-
dered in lieu of the City's removing and reconstructing a
fence on the donated property pursuant to plans approved by
the City Engineer.
SECTION 4: The City Clerk is authorized and directed
-1-
to prepare all conveyances and other instruments necessary
to effectuate the exchange of land, and the same shall be
si;.ad by the City Clerk as to acceptance on behalf of the
City. The City Clerk is authorized and instructed to accept
and record in the Office of the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County, California, a Grant Deed in favor of the
City with respect to said real property hereinabove described.
1980.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
1
City Clerk
_2_
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: February 5, 1980
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Subject: Janitorial Maintenance Contract /Lion's Park Community Center
Request authorization to award janitorial maintenance contract on the above
referenced facility to Freddie B. Miles, Maintenance and Janitorial Service
in the amount of $410.00 per month, commencing immediately and continuing
through June, 1980. (The terminus of this agreement is geared to coincide
with the conclusion of maintenance contract on City Offices. Both facilities
will be bid as a single package in May of 1980 for the period of July '80 thru
June '81)
Bids were requested from five firms, with the following results:
Freddie B. Miles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $410.00
Walden Dahl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $595.00
Sterling Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . no bid
L. Knott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . no bid
Clean Machine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . no bid
As a further note, Freddie B. Miles holds the maintenance contract for the
City Offices currently and is performing satisfactorily.
Request the item be considered by Council on 2/6/80.
---71
1
FREDDIE B. MILES MAINTENANCE 6 JANITORIAL SERVICE
875 Huron Drive
Claremont, Ca. 91711
Telephone (714) 626 -6711
TERMS OF BID:
FOR :LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
Freddie B. Miles Maintenance and Janitorial Service will perform all
the services outlined in the agreement for the sum of Four Hundred Ten
($410.00) dollars per month.
This agreement is effective beginning and covers a
period of
Cancellation of this agreement may be made by either party upon the
issuance of a thirty (30) day written notice.
Approved and Accepted:
For:
.�
For:
Freddie B. Miles
January 15, 1980
Re: Maintenance Contract - Lion's Park Community Center
Gentlemen
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is inviting bids on the daily maintenance
service at the Lion's Park Community Center Building, 9161 Base Line Rd.,
Rancho Cucamonga.
Specific requirements of the maintenance are called out under Articles I,
II, III, and IV of the attached ample agreement.
Sealed bids will be accepted at the Community Service Office, located within
City Hall, 9320 Base Line Rd., Unit "C" until 2 p.m., January 25, 1980.
The Lion's Park Community Center will be open from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m., Monday
thru Friday for your inspection and information.
If you have any questions regarding the specifications of this contract,
please contract Steve Walker, 980 -3145.
William L. Holley, Director
Community Services Department
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agreement
This Agreement is entered into in the State of California by and between
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter called CITY, and
, hereinafter called CONTRACTOR.
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the CITY wishes to contract for building maintenance services
at it's Lion's Park Community Center, located at 9161 Base Line Road,
Rancho Cucamonga;
AND, WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR has signified a willingness to provide
building maintenance services at the above cited Community Center.
IT IS THEREFORE agreed by the CITY and the CONTRACTOR as follows:
FIRST: The CONTRACTOR agrees to perform the work herein set forth:
ARTICLE I - DAILY MAINTENANCE
A. Empty and clean all trash containers.
B. Sweep and damp mop all hard surface floor areas.
C. Clean all restrooms and their fixtures.
D. Clean sinks and counter surfaces in gallery east,
gallery west, and lobby rooms.
E. Clean and /or vacuum unusually soiled carpet areas.
F. Clean and wipe down all surfaces in kitchen.
G. Refill all paper product dispensers and soap
dispensers as needed. (Material provided by City)
ARTICLE II - WEEKLY MAINTENANCE
A. Vacuum all carpet areas twice weekly, Tuesday
and Friday.
B. Dust surfaces, excluding desk top, but to include
window blinds, window frames, counters, etc.
C. Clean window surfaces at all entry points.
ARTICLE III - BI WEEKLY MAINTENANCE
A. Clean all outside window surfaces.
-1-
ARTICLE IV - MONTHLY MAINTENANCE
A. Clean all inside window surfaces.
B. Vacuum draperies in Forum stage area.
SECOND: In consideration for the above services, the CITY agrees to
pay CONTRACTOR the sum of per month.
THIRD: The CONTRACTOR agrees to supply his own consumable cleaning
materials to perform this contract.
FOURTH: This Agreement shall be on a month to month basis through
June, 1980.
FIFTH: Either the CITY or the CONTRACTOR may terminate this Agreement
at any time with written notice to the other party_
SIXTH: The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the
CITY, it's officers, agents, and employees against all liability, claims,
losses, demands and actions for injury to or deaths of persons or damage
to property arising out of or in consequence of this Agreement.
For
CONTRACTOR
Name /Title
Date
For
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 "C" Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Name /Title
Date
A.
TO: City Council, Rancho Cucamonga
FROM Rodney P. McWhirter
DATE: February 5, 1980
RE: Tree Removal Permit on Summit Avenue
ISSUES
I. Necessary Street improvements
David Long declares he needs to remove the trees because they
are obstructing necessary street improvements.
duestiont What necessary improvements? There are subdivitle<i
one acre lots on the north side of Summit Ave. that
have $100,000+ valued homes built within the last
24 months and no street improvements were necessary.
II. Exhibit "A" Tree Removal Permit Application
Mr, Dan Coleman approved, and Mr. Jack Lam affirms the decision
to grant a permit to remove the said eucalyptus trees.
Under the "to be completed by staff" section, questions �4 & 5.
iuestion 5 is answered by Mr. Coleman that the'trees are part
ofi' a windrow system, yet in #4 he answers "no" to the queetion,
"any hazards to adjacent property?"
:"_ ".nimal. Effect on Aesthetics of the Area.
:.a ^.s lion /j6, Exhibit A.
Yr. Coleman, with the stroke of his pen has decided for all of
• us on Summit Ave. that to crank up a 944 loader and proceed to
,•;,' push over twenty three, 70 ft., 15 -20 year old, healthy
eucalyyntus trees has minimal effect on the area's aesthetics.
Is that responsible community development? There is a statement
that "new trees will be planted to replace removed eucalyptus."
Should not this permit require the applicant to specify what
kind, how many, how big, and when this will be done? If it is
this easy to obtain an approval to push down these trees, I can
only assume that the replacement criteria are without definition
In summary, I'd like to make it clear that I am not opposed to
responsible community development. If, however, it is at the
expense and results in the destruction of a healthy natural
environment, I will do whatever possible to change. it.
My wife and I moved to Etiwanda from Diamond Bar, where the
ar3
x
fr
r.
a°
u.
,. 2 -
i
earthmovers have scraped the entire face of the earth away
in a little more than three years. The before /after comparison
of that community is disgusting.
I'm sure I speak for many others in this community when I
say that I hope you who direct the course of development of
this community, will use responsible judgment when dealing
with the future of Etiwanda. This is one of only a few towns
left in this whole valley that has natural beauty.
Not to be one to challenge and not offer alternatives, I suggest
the followings
1. Jo nothing. Leave the trees and street as is.
2, Mail a simplified, easy to fill out and return questionnaire
to the residents on Summit Ave. The questionnaire should have
several ontions listed and a yes -no response block as to whether
they avant the trees removed, street improved, what kind and size
of the trees to replace the eucalyptus, etc. The questionnaire
should also have attached a more detailed and legible plan of
what is going to be done. Exhibit "B" is of no use in its
condition.
3, if street improvements are, in fact, necessary and the trees
are removed, it is only fair that trees no less than 15 feet
tall, and of a fast growing variety, be planted within 30 days
and maintained until which time they become self sustaining.
4. In addition to the above, it would be interesting for all
of us I'm sure, to see a copy of the Duster Plan of Streets
and Highways, that Mr. Lam refers to in his memo to the council.
@PD:; ac�m
cc: director, Environmental Protection Agency
State of California
Attachments
February 6, 1980
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community
Center, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, February 6, 1980.
The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m, by Mayor James C. Frost who led in
the pledge to the flag.
Present: Councilmen Phillip D. Schlosser, Jon Mikels, Michael Palombo, Arthur
Bridge, and Mayor James C. Frost. Also present were staff members: City
Manager, Lauren Wasserman; City Attorney, Sam Crowe; Community Development
Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey;
and Community Services Director, Bill Holley.
Absent: Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson.
Approval of December 19, 1979 and January 16, 1980 minutes. Motion: Moved by
Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the minutes as submitted. Motion carried
5 -0.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. LAFCO meeting on Wednesday, February 13, in San Bernardino.
b. County Flood Control Zone 1 meeting on February 14, 1980 in Chino.
c. Mikels announced that on March 5 -6 would be the SCAG General Assembly meeting
at which SCAG would be considering the final proposal from the Aviation Study
Committee.
He also announced that the City of Chino had been appointed to serve on the
SCAG Executive Committee.
e. Palumbo gave a report from the Public Safety Committee meeting.
f. Staff requested that Council adjourn to a special executive session to dis-
cuss pending litigation.
g. Lloyd Hobbs requested that item 4h be removed from the Consent Calendar to
discuss at a later time.
h. Staff requested an addition to the agenda: Janitorial Services for Lion's
Park Building. Mayor said this will be heard as Staff Item 6H.
i. Staff requested that under Tract 9080 on the Consent Calendar, the last
paragraph be deleted.
3. COMMISSION REPORTS.
a. Advisory Commission: Chuck Buquet stated that at the next Commission meeting,
they would be discussing the Model Security Ordinance.
b. Historical Commission: None.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of Warrants: Register No. 80 -2 -6 for $326,625.82.
b. Release of Labor and Material Bonds for the following tracts:
City Council Minutes
- February 6, 1980
Page 2
-Tract 9036: Located on the west side of Turner Avenue at McKinley Street
Owner: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc.
Performance Bond (road) $ 68,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 34,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 9,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) $ 7,000
(Roads were accepted by City Council on May 3, 1978).
-Tract 9074: Located on the west side of Jasper Street at Lemon Avenue.
Owner: Lewis Homes of California
Performance Bond (road) $ 54,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 27,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 11,000
Labor S Material Bond (sewer) $ 71500
(Roads were accepted by the County on October 10, 1977)
-Tract 9075: Located on the east side of Sapphire Street at Lemon Avenue
Owner: Lewis Boxes of California
Performance Bond (road) $ 72,000
Labor S Material Bond (road) $ 36,000
(Roads were accepted by the County on October 10, 1977)
-Tract 9080: Located on the northeast comer of Jasper Street and Hillside Road
Owner: Griffin Development
Performance Bond (road) $196,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 98,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 19,000
-Tract 9083: Located on the north side of Arrow Route west of Malachite Avenue
Owner: Harold Rears
Labor S Material Bond (road) $ 45,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 13,500
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) $ 10,500
-Tract 9083 -1: Located on the west side of Malachite Avenue on Devon Street
Owner: Harold Hears
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 34,000
-Tract 9083 -3: Located on the north side of Arran Route at Malachite Avenue
Owner: Clarence E. Mlnnerly
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 56,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 16,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) $ 14,500
-Tract 9109: Located north of the Pacific Electric Railway between Ramona Avenue
and Hermosa Avenue
Owner: Bob Jensen Builder, Inc.
Performance Bond (road) $140,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 70,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 19,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) $ 28,500
-Tract 9110: Located on the north side of Banyan Street east of Sapphire Street
Owner: Mark III Moves, Inc.
Performance Bond (road) $ 70,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 35,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 22,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) $ 14,000
1
City Council Minutes
February 6, 1980
Page 3
-Tract 9116: Located on the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Jasper
Street.
Owner: Cary G. Miller
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 16,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 13,000
-Tract 9131: Located on the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Jasper Street
Owner: Vanguard Builders
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 91,000
-Tract 9150: Located on the northside of Jasper Street at whirlaway Street
Owner: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc.
Performance Bond (road) $110,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 55,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 28,000
-Tract 9153: Located on the west side of Turner Avenue south of Effen Street
Owner: R 6 J Investors
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 22,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) $ 16,500
-Tract 9157: Located on the east side of Carnelian south of Baseline
Owner: Kaufman and Broad Homes, Inc.
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $114,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 58,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer) $ 32,000
-Tract 9171: Located on the west side of Amethyst Street at Alta Loma Drive
Owner: Shelly Investment, Inc., and
Pomona Shervice Company
Performance Bond (road) $ 62,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 31,000
-Tract 9187: Located on the north side of San Bernardino Road east of
Archibald Avenue
Owner: Thompson Associates Development Company
Performance Bond (road) $110,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (road) $ 55,000
-Tract 9194: Located on the nortwest corner of Arrow Route and Turner .Avenue
Owner: Arnold Anderson
Labor 6 Material Bond (water) $ 12,500
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer -on site) $ 8,500
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer -Off site) $ 6,000
-Tract 9325: Located on the north side of 19th
Street between Sapphire
Street and Jasper Street
Owner: Hughes Development
Performance Bond (water -on
site)
$
93,000
Performance Bond (water -off
site)
$
33,000
Performance Bond (sewer -on
site)
$
80,000
Performance Bond (sewer -off
site)
$
9,000
City Council Minutes
February 6, 1980
Page 4
-Tract 9377: Located on the southeast corner of Monte Vista Street and
Hermosa Avenue
Owner: Bob Jensen Building, Inc.
Labor S Material Bond (road)
$
76,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (water)
$
25,500
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer -on site)
$
22,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (sewer -off site)
$
7,000
-Tract 9402: Located on the south side of Lemon Avenue
at Mayberry Avenue
Owner: Olympus Pacific Corporation
Performance Bond (water -on site)
$
14,000
Performance Bond (water -off site)
$
7,000
Performance Bond (sewer -on site)
$
14,000
Performance Bond (sewer -off site)
$
11,000
-Tract 9590: Located on the east side of Archibald Avenue south of Carrari Street
Owner: Terrax Corporation
Performance Bond (water) $ 31,000
c. Authorization for City Manager and Mayor to attend the National League of Cities
Congressional City Conference in Washington, D.C. on March 15 -18. This is an
approved budgeted item.
d. Site Approval 79 -01: Acceptance of Agreement and Bond
Performance and Labor d Material Improvement
Security Instrument $ 51,000
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR SITE APPROVAL
NO. 79 -01. (Community Baptist Church).
e. Parcel Map 1366 - Parcel No. 4: Approving Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security for Vivlenda Street.
Performance Bond (load) $ 11,600
Labor S Material Bond (road) $ 11,600
RESOLUTION N0, 80 -11
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR VIVIENDA
STREET (PARCEL MAP 1366, MINOR SUBDIVISION W77- 0517).
f. Approval of Cost and Maintenance Agreement for widening of the Santa Fe Railroad
Crossing on Vineyard Avenue.
This agreement covers the cost of construction of the crossing and paving and future
maintenance of both the paving and crossing gates. Both of these costs will be
shared equally between the City and Railroad.
g. Request of award of Design Agreement to M.P.A. not to exceed $2,200 for design
of traffic signal installation for the intersection of Fourth Street and Archibald
Avenue. The Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street signal is on the priority list of
Council approved traffic signals.
City Council Minutes
February 6, 1980
Page 5
h. Item removed for discussion.
i. Refer claim of Edgar H. Wallace of Wrightwood, California, to City Attorney
for handling.
j. Approval of Amendment to Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement - Section IO.C,
Seniority Rights.
At the meeting of the Omnitrans Board of Directors held on the 3rd day of
October, 1979, the Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement was amended to consolidate
East End Division with the Metro Division, under Section 10.0 for the purpose
of seniority rights determinations.
k. Minor Subdivision 78 -0194 - Bond Extension Request:
The City Council has accepted bonds for security of street improvement installation
on December 20, 1978. The developer, Bowden 6 Nicholas has requested a six (6)
month extension on the improvement agreement.
1. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Anthony B. D'Agnenica and Bruce
R. Harris, Pizza 'N Stuff, located at 9740 19th Street for on -sale beer and wine.
M. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Avo N. Beltekian, Avo's Arco
Station, located at 9533 Foothill Blvd., for off sale beer and wine.
n. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Irvin E. Remy, 9704 -96 19th Street
for off -sale general.
0. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Gilbert B. Rodriquez, s/w corner
Foothill and Vineyard for on -sale general eating place.
p. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Eugene C. DeYoung, Geno's, located
at 3241 Foothill Blvd, for on -sale beer and wine eating place.
q. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Anthony B. D'Agnenica, Pizza 'N
Stuff, located at 9740 19th Street, for on -sale beer and wine eating place.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve the amended Consent
Calendar with item 4h deleted. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -05 - City of Rancho Cucamonga. Staff
report by Jack Lam.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public
hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No. 94
and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
Number and title read by Wasserman.
ORDINANCE NO. 94 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 79 -05 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND
REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTS.
?5M1
City Council Minutes
February 6, 1980
Page 6
5B. Appeal of Tree Removal Permit for David Long. Staff report by Jack Lam.
Mayor requested a five minute recess in order to read a letter received from Mr.
Long just prior to the meeting. A recess was called at 7:35 p.m.; meeting reconvened
at 7:40 p.m. with all Council members present.
Mr. Lam stated that the Planning Commission had approved a request for David Long
to remove twenty -three eucalyptus trees on the south side of Summit Avenue, east
of Etiwanda Avenue as part of the street improvements for a residential development
and for subdivision purposes. However, the City had also received appeals from
Rodney and Andrea McWhirter and gaylynne Mathis stating that these trees were important
as wind breaks and also important to the neighborhood for their beauty and shade. The
existing trees would have to be removed since they were in the path of the required
proposed street improvements.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing.
Mrs. Mathis said they felt the windrow should be replaced as a break from the high.
winds which is experienced in the Etiwanda area. She said they wanted something
besides the usual street tree which the City recommended.
Mrs. McWhirter also stated the desire to see the windrow replaced.
Mr. Long said he could not proceed with the street improverents intil the windrow
came down.
Mayor closed the public hearing.
Bridge asked Lam what provisions had the Planning Commission made for the replace-
ment of these trees? Mr. Lam said they had only planned to use the regular street
trees.
Bridge said that what was needed was a windbreak replacement. There were types of
trees such as the Eucd ptus Sideroxylong Hosea which had minimal liability if properly
maintained. He suggested that they, be planted 15 to 18 feet apart.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to require the planting of the appropriate
kind of trees as a wind break replacement for the ones being removed for street
improvements on Summit Drive.
Council continued the discussion on the number of trees to be planted. Bridge again
said they should be 15 foot on center in order to provide a good wind break. He also
said they should be of 5 gallon size since the 15 gallon size often were root bound.
By using the smaller tree and with proper maintenance, in five years you would have
a stronger, healthier tree.
Bridge amended the motion to include a 15 foot minimum and a 25 foot maximum on center
for the planting of the trees with final review and approval by the Planning Department.
Mayor opened the meeting for a public hearing again.
Mr. Long said he would agree with the motion which had been made.
Public hearing was closed.
Mikels, who made the original motion, concurred he would agree with the changes in the
potion that the trees were to be of the type that would give the beet wind protection
and to be planted as close as possible without harm to the trees.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and
Forst. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
City Council Minutes
February 6, 1980
Page 7
5C. Ordinance No. 39 -A before Council for second reading. Staff report by Lauren
Wasserman.
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing
was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to approve the second reading of
Ordinance No. 39 -A and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following
vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Palombo
(left the Council Chambers temporarily). Number and title read by Wasserman.
ORDINANCE NO. 39 -A (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 39 PERTAINING TO TRAFFIC CONTROL REGULATIONS.
Recess. Mayor called a recess since Councilman Palombo had been called out of the
meeting. Recess was called at 8:15 p.m. and reconvened at 8:25 p.m. with Council-
man Palombo still absent. All other members of the Council and staff were present.
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
6A. Status Report on Cost Allocation Program.
An oral report was presented by Doug Ayres, a consultant which had been hired to
help with the implementation of Proposition 4.
At 8:40 p.m. Councilman Palombo returned to the Council table.
Mr. Ayres presented his philosophy and basic approach to the implementation of
the requirements set forth in Proposition 4. He said be would be back at the
April 2 City Council meeting with an interim report.
6B. Deannexation of uninhabited territory from Rancho Cucamonga to the City of
Ontario. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman.
Mr. Wasserman said both Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario have been negotiating to
deannex some small parcels of land from the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the City
of Ontario. The primary reason for deannexatlon is better service can be provided
by the City of Ontario.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No. 80 -9
and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number
and title read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AGREEING TO THE
APPORTIONMENT OF PROPERTY TAX IN ANNEXATION NO. 156.
City Council Minutes
February 6, 1980
Page 8
6C. Zone I Storm Drain Committee. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs
Because of the major commitment to the Cucamonga Channel project, Zone 1 is facing
a deficit for the coming fiscal year with no monies available for city projects.
Therefore, cities have initiated a search to alternative sources of funding.
Zone 1 Flood Control Advisory Committee discussed the possibility of a zone -wide
bond issue. In order to facilitate this process, it was recommended that each
city engineer take information to their Council to affirm interest in such a bond
issue and to ask that one representative be assigned from each Council to the
Committee to further explore alternative funding sources.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve this concept and to
appoint Councilman Schlosser to sit on this Technical Committee as the Rancho
Cucamonga City Council representative. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSTAINED: Schlosser. Bridge
said he would like to also be included.
6D. Rural Roads - street development standards for landlocked parcels. Staff
report by Jack Lam.
At a recent City Council meeting, the issue of access to landlocked parcels was
discussed. The issue was deferred until a report on rural roads was completed.
However, the staff member assigned to that project is no longer working for the
city.
Mikels said he would like to see a policy which would address parcels which are not
necessarily landlocked.
Doug Hone, Hone and Associates, questioned the wisdom of not getting improvements for
the frontage lots up front. He said with costs going up continually, and even with
liens on the property, the owner probably would not be able to put in the required
improvements several years away.
Jack Lam and Lloyd Hubbs both stated the problem with this suggestion was that
the City would have to maintain an isolated piece of property, and it would
probably be deteriorated before any other improvement would be connected with it.
Others addressing Council in favor of adopting the Planning Commission's recom-
mendation regarding access to landlocked parcels where no subdivision occurs were:
Mrs. Bonneville, and
Herman Hempel, Chairman of the Planning Commission.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to direct staff to prepare an
ordinance change to adopt the requirements of the Planning Commission's Resolution
No. 80 -01. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo,
Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
6E. Street Naming. Staff report by Jack Lam.
A request by the Planning Commission for the City Council to determine a process
for street naming within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to direct staff to prepare an
ordinance for street naming and solicit the Planning Commission's comments on
said ordinance.
The meeting was opened for public input.
Herman Rempel, Chairman of the Planning Commission, spoke in favor of proceeding
with this project and doing a thorough job.
Wanda Dixon suggested that the City contact the Post Office officials and work
with them since this could present extreme problems for the postal department.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge,
and Frost. NOES: Ncne. ABSENT: None.
City Council Minutes
February 6, 1980
Page 9
6F. Reversion of Acreage of Tract No. 9399 and Tract No. 9499 - north side
of Banyan, west of Beryl. Staff report by Sack Lam.
These two tracts were approved in 1977 by the County. However, no construction
had occurred, and the original improvement agreements had been in default since
September 1979.
The City Attorney had sent a letter to the current owners stating that unless
the requisite bonds and agreements were submitted for the February 6 City Council
meeting for acceptance,that action would be taken to revert to acreage.
Mr. Lam announced that new bonds have been posted and agreements signed. He
suggested that this item be continued to the February 20 meeting where it would
appear on the Consent Calendar for acceptance of bonds.
Discussion followed by Council as to whether they wanted to approve this or have
it revert back to acreage. Mr. Lam stated that Council still had the option to
reverse the acreage.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Schlosser to initiate a reversal to '
acreage for Tracts 9399 and 9400 and to set February 20, 1980 for public hearing
on the reversion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels,
Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
6C. Request to adopt Resolution No. 80 -8, setting forth compensation for
election officials designated by the City Clerk. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman.
Council had approved compensation for precinct workers at the previous meeting.
However, we were going to need additional workers the night of election at
the Counting Center, Lion's Park Building, etc. Staff was recommending a compensa-
tion. of $30.00 which was the amount set for clerks and judges on the Precinct
Boards.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 80 -8
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number
and title read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -8
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING THE COMPENSA-
TION FOR ELECTION OFFICIALS,
6H. Added item: Resolution to authorize purchase of the fourth parcel of
land for Heritage Park. Staff report by Sam Crowe.
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No.
80 -14 and waive entire reading. Motion carried by-the following vote: AYES;
Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost, NOES: None, ABSENT; None.
Number and title read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE
PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH-
WEST CORNER OF BERYL AND HILLSIDE,
City Council Minutes
February 6, 1980
Page 10
6I. Added item: Janitorial Maintenance for Lion's Park Community Building.
Staff report by Bill Holley.
Bids had been solicited from five janitorial companies for maintenance of
the Lion's building. Proposals were received from two of the companies as
follows:
Freddie B. Miles for $410.00 per month
Walden Dahl for $595.00 per month
Freddie B. Miles has the contract for the city offices and is doing a satisfactory
job. Staff requests that the contract be awarded to Freddie B. Miles for $410.00
per month.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to award the contract to Freddie
B. Miles for the janitorial maintenance of the Lion's Park building at $410.00
per month. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels,
Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
Mr. Crowe said he had only one report for Council and that had already been
placed before Council prior to the meeting which deals with the limits on campaign
expenditures and contributions.
8. NEW BUSINESS.
a. Bridge asked if the railroad station on Amethyst would be cleaned up. Mr.
Holley said that the cleanup had started today, and it was hoped that it would
be completed by the end of the week.
b. Mayor introduced Tim Beetle, the new Associate Planner for the City.
c. Planning Commission terms. Mr. Lam said the appointments are coming up
since two terms of office expire on March 8. Mayor suggested that a new Council
should make these appointments. He felt it would be in order for the Council to
pass an urgency ordinance at the next meeting to extend the expiring Planning
Commission terms to June 1. Council concurred to place this on the February 20 agenda.
d. Approval of Tract 9583: Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs.
Located east of Haven Avenue at Hillside, 49 lots
Owner: Deer Creek Company
Performance bond (road) $440,000
Labor 6 Material (road) $440,000
Mr. Hubbs said normally this item would appear on the Consent Calendar, but this
came in too late to put on the agenda.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No. 80 -15
and waive entire reading. Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and
title read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE-
MENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL
MAP OF TRACT NO. 9583.
City Council Minutes
February 6, 1980
Page 11
e. Added item: Baseline Right -of -way Acquisition. Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs
The subject right -of -ways are required for the widening of Baseline between
Beryl and Lion. Resolution Nos. 80 -12 and 80 -13 accept donations of the right -
fo ways, establishing market value, and authorizing in lieu payment of $1,750 for
fence construction.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 80 -12
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number
and title read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DONATION
OF PROPERTY IN FEE AND DETERMINING THE FAIR MARKET
VALUATION THEREOF.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 80 -13
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the folloiwng vote: AYES:
Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
Number and title read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 80 -13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING DONATION
OF PROPERTY IN FEE AND DETERMINING THE FAIR MARKET
VALUATION THEREOF.
9. ADJOURNMENT,
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn to an executive
session to reconvene on February 19 for a joint meeting with the Planning Commission
to be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Neighborhood Facility at 9171 Arrow Route. The
meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
1
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk