No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/03/19 - Agenda PacketAGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga Regular Meeting March 19, 1980 AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE: All items submitted for the City Council agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Pledge to Flag. B. Roll Call: Schlosser 'l , Mikels k , Palombo_p_, Bridge, Frost. • C. Approval of Minutes: None were submitted. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Advisory Commission, March 20, 6:30 p.m. - Library Conference Room. b. Mayors' d Presidents Policy Committee, Thursday, April 10, 7:00 p.m. Ontario City Council Chambers, 303 East "B" Street. c. Citizens' Advisory Committee final study session of General Plan alternatives - March 22, 9:00 a.m., Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility. d. Development representatives of regional shopping centers to present concepts to Planning Commission and review of General Plan alternatives on March 24, 7:00 p.m. - Lion's Park Community Center. 3. REPORTS. A. Advisory Commission B. Historical Commission C. Storm Drain Assessment District report. D. A request has been received by a group of citizens to address the Council regarding storm damage. City Council Agenda -2- March 19, 1980• 4. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants: Register No. 80 -3 -19 for $249,769.03. 1 b. Set public hearing date of April 2, 1980 for consideration of designation of the Oso Bear as a Historic Landmark and the original Cucamonga Post Office site as a Point of Historic Interest. c. Set public hearing date of April 2, 1980 for Zone Change No. 80 -01 Issaacs - A change of zone from R -3 to C -2 for property located on the northwest corner of Base Line and East Avenue. d. Set public hearing date for May 7, 1980 - Appeal of Zone Change No. 80 -02 - Watt Industries - A change of zone from R -3 to C -2 for property lcoated on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon and Highland. e. Set public hearing date for May 21, 1980 - Appeal of Site Approval No. 80 -01 - Hone and Associates - Proposed shopping center to be located on the southwest corner of Lemon and Haven. f. Authorization for Deputy City Clerk to attend the 8th Annual 3 Conference, Cities Clerks' Association of California on April 17 -19. Cost: Approximately $200. • g. Acceptance of Bond and Agreement /Laird Construction. 4 Laird Construction has been hired to perform certain emergency street restoration at various locations designated as an eminent hazard. Security is sufficient in nature to insure orderly payment of labor and materials. Labor and Material (surety) $ 50,000 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -25 which directs the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and security on behalf of the City. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -25 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LABOR AND MATERIAL AGREEMENT - LAIRD CONSTRUCTION. h. Request authorization to seek bids on the city's Base Line re- 6 construction project from Agate to Hellman Avenue and from Archibald Avenue to Teak Way. The project is to be funded through a combination of FAU funds, State matching funds, and City qas tax. Estimated proportions are listed below: • City Council Agenda -3- March 19, 1980 City FAU funds $133,200 State matching funds 35,000 City funds 81,800 $250,000 Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve the advertise- ment of the Base Line reconstruction project. i. Tracts 9267, 9268, and 9269: Request for bond extensions. 7 Developer: Mark III Homes, Inc. These tracts were approved by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors on April 25, 1977, along with the improvement agreement and improvement securities. The tract maps were sub- sequently approved. The sewer and water facilities were approved and the bonds were released on July 18, 1979. The road and home constructions are both 75% complete. Request is for a two year extension and their surety company is in agreement to the time extension. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council grant a twelve month extension from the date of default to complete the street improvements. Therefore, the developer, by this extension • has until October 25, 1980 to complete the street improvements. Further, it is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to notify the developer of the time extension on the road improvement agreement. j. Tract 9351: Request for bond extension. Developer: Mark III 14 Homes. Approval of the final tract map and appropriate improvement agree- ment and improvement securities was received on February 1, 1978. The developer has subsequently graded the property and has executed a street permit to construct the necessary street improvements. The water system has been installed, and the developer is currently working with the Cucamonga County Water District on the installation of the sewer system. The Cucamonga County Water District has agreed to the extension request, and the surety for the developer agrees with the 24 -month extension. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve a twelve month extension subject to approval to the condition that the developer replace all bonds and agreement that reflect current City forms and estimate cost of construction. Further, that the developer make arrangements with the CCWD to replace bonds presently being held by the City. k. Tract 9423: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement. Located on the 19 southwest corner of Base Line Road and Beryl Avenue and consists of 22 lots. Developer: Coral Homes, Performance Bond (road) $137,500 Labor 8 Material (road) $137,500 I City Council Agenda -4- March 19, 1980 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -26 directing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City Council, and the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf of the City. The City Engineer shall forward the map for recording. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -26 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9423. 1. Tract 9444: Located on the northeast corner of- Banyan 22 Street and Amethyst Street and consists of 20 lots. Release bonds to: Rancho De Cucamonga (Mark III Homes) Performance Letter of Credit (road) $ 76,000 Labor & Material Letter of Credit (road) $ 76,000 Accept bonds from: Fox Hollow Development (Nubank Inter- national). Performance Bond (road) $ 76,000 Labor & Material Bond (road) $ 76,000 The subject tract has been sold to the Fox Hollow Company. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -27 directing the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf of the City. Also, to hereby release the securities presently on file with the City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -27 24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVE- MENT SECURITY. m. Refer claim by Mr. and Mrs. T. L. Slasingame for $3,600 25 to the City Attorney for handling. n. -- Approval ol~,Alcoholic Be rage licenhie permit to John K. 27 _ Ina�s, IsaacZ' Chevron Se ice Stati 8687 Base Line Road �,iCense�t r\Off sale r and w�. o, Award of Contract for Base Line Widening, 29 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve award of the Base Line Widening project to Crowell and Larson and authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute contract documents. Also, the Council approved authorization to fund the contract amount of $39,789.82 plus a 10% contingency and $2,000.00 for construction staking. 10 • City Council Agenda -5- March 19, 1980 • S. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. Resolution of Necessity - Teasdale Property. Staff report 35 by Robert Dougherty. The resolution adopted by Council on November 15, 1978 was defective in that reference to the particular state law authorizing condemnation was omitted. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a new resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -28 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, TO EXERCISE RIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE PURPOSES. B. An Appeal by Pluess - Staufer. Staff report by Jack Lam. 41 The Pluess- Staufer project is a proposed 80 acre industrial calcium carbonate processing plant to be located between 8th Street and 6th Street, west of Rochester. The processing facility will include rock rail unloading and storage facility, • rock crushing and grinding facilities, storage silos, bagging and warehousing facilities, rail car and truck loading facili- ties, and maintenance buildings, and an office building. The Planning Commission gave final approval of the Pluess- Staufer facility on January 9, 1980. However, the Commission did approve the site layout on November 19, 1979. The Planning Commission waited for final approval in order to give Pluess- Staufer an opportunity to revise their landscaping plans to be more con- sistent with the objectives of the City in promoting well designed projects that reflect a high quality. The challenge for Pluess - Staufer was to design the site and create design elements compatible with the area. The largest structure on the facility is to be 105 feet high and the raw materials stock pile is to be 40 feet making this facility a very visually prominent feature. The Pluess- Staufer plant is proposed in the heart of an area in which planned industrial parks are either in the design stages or have already been approved. Therefore, visual relief and other environmental concerns such as noise and dust attenuation are important to the compatibility of the Pluess- Staufer use with the future of planned industrial activities in the area. It was the concern of the Planning Commission, staff, City of Ontario, and adjacent property owners that if the use goes in, it must be made to be compatible through proper buffering. The Planning Commission approved the facility with conditions that required appropriate landscape buffering. THESE CONDITIONS FOR BUFFERING ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE APPEAL. City Council Agenda -6- March 19, 1980 Recommendation: It is the recommendation of staff and the • Planning Commission that the Appeal be denied, and the Planning conditions for landscape buffering be upheld. C. Amendment to Historic Preservation Ordinance No. 70. 52 Report by Bill Holley. The amendment imposes a ban on material changes to proposed historical landmarks. ORDINANCE NO. 70 -C 54 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 70 BY ADDING SUB- SECTION (h) THERETO TO PROHIBIT MATERIAL CHANGES ON PROPOSED LANDMARKS UNTIL FINAL ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. Disaster Preparedness Plan for Rancho Cucamonga. Oral report by Bill Holley, Community Services Director. B. Public Works Maintenance Program. Report by Lloyd Hobbs. 55 • Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council approve in concept the maintenance program as outlined and authorize the recruitment of staff and acquisition of equipment as follows: Additional Staff One Maintenance Worker III Two Maintenance Workers II Two Maintenance Workers I Major Equipment One asphalt patch truck* j 45,000 Two dump trucks equipped with blade or loader 60,000 One street sweeper /catch basin cleaner 75,000 One front end loader with hoe and drag attach. 35,000 One full size pick -up truck 15,000 One utility vehicle 15,000 Total TUTIMF *Received prior Council authorization to solicit bids. C. Resolution to Implement Locally Controlled Air Quality Manage- 57 me -- nt Plan eases Staff report by Jack Lam Recommendation: If the City Council concurs that the measures delineated in Resolution No. 80 -29 involve minimal staff effort and minimal cost to the City in implementation, adoption of the Resolution is recommended. • City Council Agenda -7- RESOLUTION NO. 80 -29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INDICATING ITS INTENT TO IMPLEMENT PRIOR TO DECEMBER 31, 1982 HEREIN DEFINED "REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES" FROM THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN. D. Contract for Plan Processing Services. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. March 19, 1980 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement with C.G. Engineering to provide Plan Check processing and administrative services and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign on their behalf. E. Local A enc Federal Aid Urban S stem Pro'ects A reement or Signals and La q_t_ n9 at t e Norsect ono Base Line Road /Hellman Avenue and rc Street. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council • approve Resolution No. 80 -30 authorizing the execution of Supplement 1- Revision 1 to Agreement M08 -5402. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08 -5420 AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 - REVISION 1. F. FAU Funds Exchange. Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council authorize the City Manager to sign the Letter of Under- standing and authorize payment of funds as outlined in the agreement. G. ReR uest to Utilize Contin enc Funds to Provide Consultant Services or Deve opment of a turn key Personnel System. Oral report DY Lauren Wasserman. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 8. NEW BUSINESS. A. Council B. Audience 9. ADJOURNMENT. 58 62 69 70 71 ®I� Re67 . MARR 00.445 A00449 00450 00451 00452 • 00453 00454 0455 000456 • OG457 00459 p 00459 00460 00461 00462 00463 03213 0 03357 03381 03453 03452 • 03453 03454 03455 03457 03458 03459 a 0346D e 03461 03462 03463 03464 O 03465 03466 03467 03469 03469 03470 03471 03472 ® 03473 0 -,474 0-,475 �E 03476 03477 03478 03479 03480 0 03481 0348 03483 03484 ® 03485 03486 03487 03469 Q 03499 03490 �1 �p 03491 N 03492 Q 03493 03494 03495 03496 03497 Q 03498 03499 03500 03501 Q�03502 03503 03504 • 03505 03506 I, :ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M VEN M V E N 0 0 R N A M E 2635 DAHL, RICHARD 4885 HCGAN BARRY K 6935 REGENtS UC 0430 ANGELS HARDWARE 6970 PFOA CAREER BEVEL CTR EVEL 6970 VFO 9290 WEST END UNITED WAYTR 8313 SAN ORNDNO CO EMPLOY C 2000 CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT F D031 AM INTL- ORUNING OIV 1200 DANK OF AMERICA 3305 EMPLOYMENT DEVLPM.NT DEP 5275 A INTL CITY MGT ASSOC 0004 -1 LINEN 0006 A C U REFLECTERIIING CO 5140 INLAND POWER SWEEPING 0031 AM INTL- BRUNING DIV 0004 A -1 LINEN 2500 COVINGTON C CROWE 4827 HAYNES, C VOID FURMS ALIGNMENT VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT 0004 A -1 LINEN 0006 A C 8 REFLECTERIZING CO 0025 REITER DEVELOPMENT, A H 0032 A C R TIRE SERVICE 0125 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY 0165 AGRICULTURAL CORM 0240 ALTA LOMA AUTO PARTS 0250 ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRI 0415 ANDERSONt VAL 0525 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 1035 AYERS, DOUGLAS W 104C GORDON AYERS CAMERA SHD 1300 BASELINE HARDWARE 1345 BEECHEN, GEORGIA 1350 NEEDLE TIM 1409 ii F.LVEpW PLUMBING 1540 YOBS SAC K,HOE SERV 1000 BUTLER PAPER 1898 C C E LUPPER CO 2025 CAGLES PLUMBING 2075 U[PT OF TRANSPORTATION 2076 STATE OF CALIF DOCUMENT 2335 COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 2350 COLEMAN DAN 2360 CUM6EE ELECTRIC 2450 CO SAN BERNARDINO SHERI 2455 CO S414 BCNO TRANSPORTAT 2575 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 2650 DAILY REPORT 2677 UALE SHARP INC 2700 OETCO ENGRAVING /TROPHY 3303 THE EMPIRE CO 4050 FED 'MART 4260 G C S 13ACKHOE SERV 4600 GENEItAL TELEPHONE CO 4775 GRANT, JERRY R 4790 GRETCHEN GOLOIE DESIGN 4812 HARNISH, MORGAN G CAUSE 4826 HAYES MANUFACTURING 4900 HUBLCONS TRUCTIONTSPECSH 5110 IBM 6175 JOBS AVAILABLE 6617 KONN ROBERT 6640 LAIRS CONSTRUCTION CD 6783 LiNVILTE- SANDERSON -HORN 7166 MARGOT• MICHAEL 7108 MARSH C MC LENNAN INC 7200 PARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 7281 FUL MEARS G THE SHARPS 7290 MC ALLISTER, NANCY NET I� RE67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .� NARR 9 VEN 9 V E N 0 0 R N A M E z l 1 I 2 1 2 1 NET 49,769.03 n LJ u r1 LA ®I� R067 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • KARR M VEN M V E N 0 0 R N A M E 00445 2635 IR I RICHARD 00449 4885 HOGAN HARRY K OC450 8935 REGEUS UC 00451 0430 ANGELS HARDWARE 00452 6970 KFOA CAREER BEVEL CTR • 00453 6970 VFOA CAREER DEVEL CTR 00454 9290 HEST END UNITED HAY 00455 8313 SAN BRNONO CO EMPLOY C 00456 2000 CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT F • 00457 D031 AM INTL- HRUNING DIV 00458 1200 HANK OF AMERICA .� 00459 3305 FMPLOYMENT DEVLPRNT DEP 00460 5275 INTL CITY MGT ASSOC 00461 0004 A -1 LINEN 00462 0006 A G B REFLECTERIZING CO 03213 00 L 31 AM INTL- PUWER PRUNING SWEEPING DIV • 03357 0004 A -1 LINEN 03381 2500 COVINGTON C CRONE 09403 4827 HAYNL . C 03452 VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT • 03453 VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT 03454 VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT 03455 VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT 03456 0004 A -1 LINEN • 03457 0006 A G B KEFLECTERIZING CO 03458 0025 REITER DEVELOPMENT. A H p 03459 0032 A G R TIRE SERVICE 03460 6 L AGENCY 5 AGRICULTURAL COMM 03461 01 e 03462 0240 ALTA LOMA AUTO PARTS 03463 0250 ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DISTRI 03464 0415 ANDERSON VAL 03465 0525 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS • 01466 1035 AYERS. ODUGLAS H 03467 3040 GORDON AYERS CAMERA SHO 03468 1300 BASELINE HARDWARE 03469 1345 BEECHEN. GEORGIA 03470 1350 NEEDLE TIM 03472 1540 POBSE OACKHOEU SERVG Q 03473 1000 BUTLER PAPER 05474 1898 C C E LUMBER CO 0'475 2025 CAGLES PLUMHIN 03476 2075 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION • 03477 2076 STATE OF CALIF DOCUMENT 03478 2335 COCA CCLA BOTTLING CU 03479 2350 COLEMAN DAN 03460 2360 COMBEE ELECTRIC Q 03481 2450 CO SAN BERNARDINO SHERI 03482 2455 CO SAN BCNO TRANSPORTAT 03483 2575 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 03484 2650 DAILY REPORT 03485 2677 UALE SHARP INC ® 03486 2700 DETCO ENGRAVING /TROPHY 03487 3303 THE EMPIRE CO 03488 4050 FEED PART ® 03469 4260 G L S BACKHOE SERV 03490 4601 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO r�10 03442 4794 GRANT GOLDIE DESIGN 0 03493 4612 HARNISM MORGAN E CAUSE 03494 4826 HAYES MSNUFACTURING 03495 4901 HOLLEY HM - PETTY CASH 03496 4960 H013 CONSTRUCTION SPEC Q 03497 5110 IBM 03498 6175 JOBS AVAILABLE 03499 6617 KONN ROBERT 03500 6640 LAIRS CONSTRUCTION CD 03501 6763 LINVILLE- SANDERSON -MORN Q�03502 7166 MARCOTT, MICHAEL 03503 7188 MARSH C MC LENNAN INC 03504 7200 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE • 03505 7281 VEL MEARS C THE SHARPS 03506 7290 MC ALLISTER, NANCY a NET 300.00- 300.00 65.00 30.00 110.00 100.00 67.67 1.295.50 50.00 562.00 6.244.39 1,343.63 126.55 28.50 173.31 726.25 590.26 - 201.61- 5,997.70- 7.50- 275.60 41.01- 4.00 1.224.00 11,145.82 9.33 17,548.00 250.00 4,962.49 3,375.00 34.12 177.21 126.00 23.06 24.76 192.00 167.77 6,7 2 39't 4,6 1,88 6 o�. 471. 40.00 1,389.66 119.10 1,158.58 923.66 39.60 250.00 27,251.50 285.00 1,175.00 86.80 54.79 60.00 49.88 R867 . HARR 00445 A00449 00450 00451 00452 • 00453 00454 00455 00456 . OG457 00458 00459 00460 00461 00462 00463 03213 03357 03381 03403 03452 ' 03453 03454 03455 03456 03457 03458 03459 03460 • 03461 03462 03463 03464 03465 01466 03467 03468 03469 034701 03472 03473 03474 �R 03416 • 03477 03478 03479 03480 • 03481 03482 03483 03484 03485 03486 03487 03488 • 03469 03490 03491 I1 IR 03492 03493 03494 03495 03496 03497 niLon 7ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M VEN M V E N D O R N A M E 2635 DAHL, RICHARD 4805 HCGAN BARRY K 6935 REGENTS UC 0430 ANGELS HARDWARE 6970 MFOA CAREER OEVEL CTR 6970 PFOA CAREER DEVEL CTR 9290 WEST ENO UNITED HAY 8313 SAN ORNONO CO EMPLOY C 2000 CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT F 0031 AM INTL- BRUNING DIV 1200 LANK OF AMERICA 3305 EMPLOYMENT OEVLPMNT OEP 5275 INTL CITY MGT ASSOC 0004 A -1 LINEN 0006 A C O REFLECTERIIING CO 5140 INLAND POWER SWEEPING 0031 AM INTL- HRUNING DIV 0004 A -1 LINEN 2500 CGVINGTON 6 CROWE 4827 HAYNES, C VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT VOIC FORMS ALIGNMENT VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT 0004 A-1 LINEN 0006 A C 6 REFLECTERIZING CO 0025 REITER DEVELOPMENT, A H 0032 A 6 R TIRE SERVICE 0125 ACTION TRAVEL AGENCY 0165 AGRICULTURAL COMM 0240 ALTA LOMA AUTO PARTS 0250 ALTA L MA SCHOOL OISTRI 0415 ANDERSON. VAL 0525 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 1035 AYERS, OCUGLAS W 104C GOROUN AYERS CAMERA SHO 1300 BASELINE HARDWARE 1345 BEECHEN, GEORGIA 1350 REEOLE TIM 1409 MELVEDERE PLUMBING 1540 FOBS BACKHOE SERV 1800 UUTLER PAPER 1898 C C E LUMBER CO 2025 CAGLES PLUMBING 2075 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 2076 STATE OF CALIF DOCUMENT 2335 COCA CGLA 60 TLING CO 2350 COLEMAN DAN 2360 COMBEE �LECTRIC 2450 CO SAN BERNARDINO SHERI 2455 CO SAN BCNO TRANSPORTAT 2575 CUCAMONGA CO WATER GIST 2650 DAILY REPORT 22677 VALE SHARP INC 3303 THEC EMPIREAC LONG /TROPHY 4050 FED MART 4600 A TEPOY GENERAL LEHNE CO 4775 GRANT, JERRY R 4790 URETC11EN GOLDIE DESIGN 4812 HARNISH, MORGAN C CAUSE 4826 HAYES MANUFACTURING 4900 HURL CC TRUCTIONT SPEC CASH 5110 IBM 6175 InRf AVA If AM F 03501 6783 LINVILLE-SANDERSO"N -HOR 03502 7186 MARCOTT, MICHAEL 03503 7188 MARSH C MC LENNAN INC 03504 7200 MARTINE2 UNION SERVICE 03505 7281 KEL MEARS C THE SHARPS 03506 7290 MC ALLI$I R, NANCY HARR DATE NET 300.00- 300.00 65.00 30.00 110.00 100.00 67.67 1.295.50 50.00 562.00 6.244.39 1,343.63 126.55 28.50 173.31 786.25 590.26- 201 .81- 5,997.70- 7.50- 275 41 4 1,224 11.145 170546 250 4,962 3,375 1 1 6r7 2 139.1 1'8 1. 3 lr99 2 27,2 101 I� Re' 67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA NARK 0 YEN / V E N 0 0 R N A M. E 2— NET 845.00 54.00 10.83 12.50 1, 06015.36 .00 43.20 173.84 250.00 60.00 1.362.50 1.7 2 7 2,3 1 1,3 2,1458. 1,756. 249,769.03 • • • ADVANCE REGISTRATION RETURN TO: 8th Annual Conference Eileen Phinney, CMC City Clerks' Association of California Registration Committee South Coast Plaza Hotel P. O. Box 1200 •Costa Mesa, California (Please return no later than Mesa, CA 92626 April 17, 18, 19, 1980 an April /, 1980) Authelet, Beverly A. Title Deputy City Clerk Name ,, fuss I.RW phone (714)989 -1851 Address p• 0. Box 80' Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730 Z.P . su..t cuy a ssa. No. attending (including guests) � C3 New Member 0 Old Member O Guest , Check: ©575 Advance Registration Fee enclosed (Refundable if cancelled by April 10, 1980) Tot 75.00 al enclosed S 0 Guest Registration $50 (meals) Fee Registration after April to: City Clerks' Association Of e Make checks pay able Cablomfa v 9 C C A Co o 2 C N � C O o3C W2�❑ Z ° ;� o x o w C 0 V c y o T Z U d A c Z Q ° o Z O T O ° O �? u T •C O O E O C _ Pb r y A u C O 6� L �` .iaL 9 ri p •��' m w n U� 5 H ao c E v aa.mQ EE° va ou a 61 �a,E .oE mcE c UGM,� t ud cN 6 6m W n V 0 3 v A 0 C O U O Tm TO Z,c°, .0 7 rn� U�o U 3 � Z 06 W p W c � E E E u E c „¢ ° CL d U O W N °o `mZ E c�o G �U c. Z ° . ,c •a m o O o • _ MU O. Q r v Q E o p O C U Q O V F ° Z Q v 9 C C A Co o 2 C N � C O o3C W2�❑ Z ° ;� o x o w C 0 V c y o T Z U d A c Z Q ° o Z O T O ° O �? u T •C O O E O C _ Pb r y A u C O 6� L �` .iaL 9 ri p •��' m w n U� 5 H ao c E v aa.mQ EE° va ou a 61 �a,E .oE mcE c UGM,� t ud cN 6 6m W n V 0 3 v A 0 C O U O Tm TO Z,c°, .0 7 rn� U�o U 3 � Z 06 W p W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: March 19, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Subject: ACCEPTANCE OF BOND AND AGREEMENT, LAIRD CONSTRUCTION AS CONTRACTOR The subject contractor has been hired to perform certain emergency street restoration at various locations designated as an eminent hazard. Pursuant to Chapter 7, Sections 3247 thru 3258 of the Civil Code, the contractor has supplied the Engineering Division with an Agreement and security, sufficient in nature, to insure orderly payment of labor and materials. The type and amount are as follows: Labor and Material Surety $50,000 • RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution directing the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and security on behalf of the City. Respectfully submitted, 11 LLOYD R. NUBBS City Engineer LBH:nn • RESOLUTION NO. 80 -25 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Labor and Material Agreement executed on by LAIRD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, for the restoration of improvements within the public right-of-way damaged by recent storms (Beginning January 8, 1980); and WHEREAS, the restoration of such improvements are to be done by the Contractor in a manner and time as agreed upon between the Contractor and the City; and WHEREAS, said Labor and Material Agreement is secured and accom- panied by good and sufficient Labor and Materials security, which is identified in said Labor and Material Agreement for the purpose of insuring payment to Laborers and Material men; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Labor and Material Agreement be and same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Labor and Material Agreement on I,-half of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of March, 1980. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk James C. Frost, Mayor 5 J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM PATE: March 19, 1980 TO: City Council 8 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: BASE LINE STREET RECONSTRUCTION The staff would like to request authorization to seek bids on the City's Base Line Reconstruction project from Agate to Hellman Avenue and from Archibald Avenue to Teak Way. The project is to be funded through a combination of FAU funds, State matching funds and City gas tax. Estimated proportions are listed below: City FAU Funds $133,200 State Matching Funds 35,000 City Funds (fund exchange with Montclair) 81,800 TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE $250,000 Bids will be opened April 25, 1980 for award in May, 1980. • RECOMdENDATION: Recommend that City Council approve advertisement of the Base Line Reconstruction Project. i tfully s Lmi tted, ubbs ngineer LBH:deb • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: March 19, 1980 TO: City Council b City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: BOND EXTENSION REQUEST FOR TRACTS 9267, 9268 AND 9269 The subject tracts were approved by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors on April 25, 1977, along with the Improvement Agreement and improvement securities. The tract maps were subsequently approved. The sewer and water facilities were approved and the bonds were released on July 18, 1979. The road and home construction are both75% complete. The developer, Mark III Homes, Inc., have requested a two (2) year extension and their surety company is in agreement to the time extension. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council grant a twelve (12) month ex- tension from the date of default to complete the street improvements. Therefore, the developer, by this extension, has until October 25, 1980, to complete the street improvements. Further, it is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to notify the developer of the time extension on the Road Improvement Agreement. Respectfully submitted, O �, 8, ubbs City ngineer LBH:deb I ri TRACT NO. 9267 KIN G 1 A SUBDIVISION OF A �11 RT ON OF THE E451 ONE VALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE ' OU ATER. SECT IOM 27, TOW Nl.lP I NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, 5 80, RECORDS OF SAID CMNTY L � K /N,- 4"MeRIAM6 CO3PX a MAY, 1D7a AVENUE f. '7 A a is Z t- i AW_ IF aw WILSON TI It % t la J Sell, I'vo, F, • 26 26 At Z, p ZO 21 INS a MAY, 1D7a AVENUE f. '7 A a is Z t- i I f-F IF aw TI It % t la J Sell, I'vo, F, • 26 26 a MAY, 1D7a AVENUE f. '7 A a is E Z t- i I f-F IF aw TI It % t la J Sell, I'vo, E Z t- i I f-F IF aw TI F, o Z-t E Z t- i I f-F IF E w THE COUNTY TRACT N0 9268 1 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT t AND 2, AND A PORTION OF THE EASY ONE HALF OF THE NORTHEAST Q!Yw-QUARTER, ALL IN SECTION 27. TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST. 11.., IN THE COUNT' 01 SAN BERNARDINO• STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. AND A PORTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS RECORDED IN BOOK I PACE 26, OF MAPS. RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY 0-- Z Aw 9 L.D KING ENGINEERING CO..INC, w as -1-1. lit �T 7 A V 1 7, 3 3R, ell . . . . . . %A -.5'.." At YL Vt Ai 2c eTz,?,V% J, 1,to 7ES te T�? Its, 51 /.11 Its Is It C, It 0 It W lz r: F mi o ja A I V, V, - 7 A V 1 7, 3 3R, ell . . . . . . %A -.5'.." At YL Vt Ai 2c eTz,?,V% J, 1,to 7ES te T�? Its, 51 /.11 Its Is It C, It 0 It W lz r: F mi o ja A V, - 7 A V 1 7, 3 3R, ell . . . . . . %A -.5'.." At YL Vt Ai 2c eTz,?,V% J, 1,to 7ES te T�? Its, 51 /.11 Its Is It C, It 0 It W lz r: F mi o ja V 1 I �I it TRACT N0. 92t_,9 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND A PORTION OF THE A ONE HALF OF 6 PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT I TOWNSNIPI THE EAST ONE 7 WE OF THE NORTHEAST dCOUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINOE STATE 2OF CALIFORNIA ACCOR6 RANGE T WEST, SBM, NORTH ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL AAGE 26, RECORDSFOF SAID COUNTY. OF PANGNO CUCAMONGd, AS RECORDED IN MAP BOON I, LO KING ENGINEERING CO., INC. ,° EunuSf! E4 `.� ..... ..+.. ... wIi fYJI u L! C .II Di mI V' h' P5,5 OF CLIR�/"5' ii1ryJ f/ a f/Mw•• No TES c+r nnnl.n o im. afe. a.I / "rr wr.... r•• A >c .. 1 f d +•. Date:_Egbiwary 11, 1980 • Honorable City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA • • RE: TRACT NO. 9267 BOND NO. Gentlemen: I is hereby requested, by the undersigned, that the time be extended for a period of 24 months to complete the required improvements as provided for in the Subdivision Agreement of the above referenced tract for the following reason(s): More time needed due to marketing and weather conditim . SURETY OR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Hartford ciden VE Indemnity Co. By ' tCI 1 E Date: February 26, 1980 DATE E %TENSION APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL: CITY ENGINEER. RECOMMENDATION: CITY, JJPLANNING DIVISION RECOMMENDATION: A pr Oal 9 Disapproval .7� Ap rov 1 D' approval By T „ .,, , By: 3 -/0 -BU Date: CUCIMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT cc: su=ty C. ... a i,.:iai �nStl iu vl Vll RECD NENDAT 1ON: City Engineer /Apyroval Disa p[oval D E: '-1 l� / Date: February 13, 1980 Honorable City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA RE: TRACT NO. 9268 BOND NO. Gentlemen: I is hereby requested, by the undersigned, that the time be extended for a period of 24 months to complete the required improvements as provided for in the Subdivision Agreement of the above referenced tract for the following reason(s): SURETY OR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION DATE E %TENSION APPROVED BY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CITY COUNCIL: Hartford cciden 6 Indemnity Co. BY: Date: February 26, 1980 CITY ENGINEER RECWIMENDATION: CITY /p CANNING DIMS ON RECOMMENDATION: ey ✓ A prov 1� ^ •, Disapproval ]� App ov ;l 0 Disapproval `{A,r,/ 1/. X11 D a'e: Date: CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT cc: Surety or "Financial lnstitutlon RECOMMENDATION: City Engineer /--Approval ✓/ Disapproval J DATE: I L • • • Date: February 13, 1980 Honorable City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA RE: TRACT NO. 9269 BOND N0. Gentlemen: I is hereby requested, by the undersigned, that the time be extended for a period of 24 months to complete the required improvements as provided for in the subdivision Agreement of the above referenced tract for the following reason(s): I4ore tine needed due to marketing and weather conditions. SURETY OR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION Hartford cciden E Indemnity Co. Date: February 16, 1980 CITY ENGINEER RECOMMENDATION: / AApproval Disapproval By: Surety ' .. ..__ al institction City Engineer DATE EXTENSION APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL: CITY P NNING DIVISION RECOMMENDATION: roval Disapproval Date: — CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ' ,l "pproval Disapproval i 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: March 19, 1980 TO: City Council 8 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: BOND EXTENSION REQUEST FOR TRACT 9351 The developer, Mark III Homes, Inc., received approval of the final tract map and appropriate Improvement Agreement and improvement securities on February 1, 1978. The developer has subsequently graded the property and has executed a street permit to construct the necessary street improvements. The water system has been installed and the developer is currently working with the Cucamonga County Water District on the installation of the sewer system. The Cucamonga County Water District has agreed to the extension request and the surety for the developer agrees with the 24 month extension. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a twelve (12) month • extension subject to approval to the condition that the developer replace all bonds and agreement that reflect current City forms and estimate cost of construction. Further, that the developer make arrangements with the Cucamonga County Water District to replace bonds presently being held by the City. Respectfullys omitted, -`(-55��`/� /vim Llo 8. Hubbs City Engineer LSH:deb i TRACT O, 351 1X111 2 er Y 1FIiT1 IM IN E I I 1 D( SINENe [NC AN QN 4 KING t S: %1Y11111 , 1 Nzi1LN lr Wt$ t e. IHI Y v-D; 11 [IPO:J q1 M(Si[IC'11T $A' iCN. IS W SIAM IN QCAL S N MtG1. CIrZ 4[, YEC(COS K a550<1 <Tto INFrMl Ia1 M EpM1Y V $C \' RMI %IIN. SIIR 6 ULIILPNII 1 -• .r w[1Uq•Gt1KKw< .•. _ _ ___ vwrr O.LYYAA' - s >.!!F>• - .��:.' =� —ir ii�u'R ~an IINN . }�FY ryt W9 90vCld'S NOBS IV UaT •^ w ^< nr+•< ri. �� wi r w' ••ur Ir rO wMw �' M ^i1•r rr�\ wi �I � n• i • rir•w. rii ii i�ni,ii { • •\,1� r� wVrnnufl �•w lrF •n lrn[.n wr Y•\w ••���- •nw.n Yn w�F lw Yrnr\1 IrF rY Y\nu Jr lwnn. I.n\wr • -fYia,Ai n. �• � �r /S ^ � ? /�� M rMUn nYl nlw nlr. n.. 1, l••w Yw r,l.[. [••n � yr ~ n uo:/.:` n � �♦ I.MI O • •• • nr [urn \wn\w • �YnlrMrlrM lluinla, � 1 � uwll�wlinwiylrnr��i Mry. •, i • � �J�wJ (1 rrr 1 �r I' r n. wwrwrr•�rl n - • r•.r•r \,1 rwr PwMrr /ry w .,'r f_i � M n,• -err: rr.;r�r'i.n b %rwn <��irLl�r^A Few •.rr s : 1 {r�I{"�I:�- n�wiiYSf.« _err rRJC�. -frYO «r.r a <.. ,•rplcn C• r T IINN . }�FY ryt W9 90vCld'S NOBS IV UaT •^ w ^< nr+•< ri. �� wi r w' ••ur Ir rO wMw �' M ^i1•r rr�\ wi �I � n• i • rir•w. rii ii i�ni,ii { • •\,1� r� wVrnnufl �•w lrF •n lrn[.n wr Y•\w ••���- •nw.n Yn w�F lw Yrnr\1 IrF rY Y\nu Jr lwnn. I.n\wr • -fYia,Ai n. �• � �r /S ^ � ? /�� M rMUn nYl nlw nlr. n.. 1, l••w Yw r,l.[. [••n � yr ~ n I.MI O • •• • nr [urn \wn\w • �YnlrMrlrM lluinla, ® • nrnl l' un rrF \.I. IT wul rrFr. � uwll�wlinwiylrnr��i Mry. •, i • � �J�wJ (1 rrr 1 �r I' r n. wwrwrr•�rl n - • r•.r•r \,1 rwr PwMrr /ry w .,'r r !w•r}+IM <lrw•r�wry1/. I`rn�w I L11-1 E. �2 • � i `O i ,� � 11 I�.,rI.I� y0 -59 11 S, ii r; owl 37 s .� ` f • j' . r` e .,,:'t% ^' `k qO rt "'.t i tit \ b 1.l i \�. ,� ,.' w o Off W BANYAN "t MEE T�•�•,.. _._�'" El E. �2 • � i `O i ,� � 11 I�.,rI.I� y0 -59 11 S, ii r; owl 37 s .� ` f • j' . r` e .,,:'t% ^' `k qO rt "'.t i tit \ b 1.l i \�. ,� ,.' w o Off W ... .. .. ... El- I 56 A f 14 55 / Y 34 33 16 33 44 Mi 17 52 MIT a 5$ 46 19 k so -,it. r,47 6 ll lsi�i 30 4 20 49 29 ;.:PARB '_A NUE A: 26 2 23 24 26 27 • Date: February 13, 1980 • Honorable City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, CA • RE: TRACT No.9351 BOND NO. Gentlemen: I is hereby requested, by the undersigned, that the time be extended for a period of 24 months to complete the required improvements as provided for in the subdivision Agreement of the above referenced tract for the following reason(s): More time needed due to marketing and wither conditions. SURETY OR FINANCIAL INSTITUTION DATE E %TENSION APPROVED BY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CITY COUNCIL: HARTFORD CIDENT INDEMNITY CO. By Date: February 26, 1980 CITY ENGINEER RECOMMENDATION: CITY PLANNING DIVISION RECOMMENDATION! ,---Approval Disapproval ��pxgvyl I ,7� isapproval By: iyr /// h B D� 3' /O —u0 Date: U CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT CC$ Surety or Financial Institution RECOMMENDATION; City Engineer t6pproval Disa pproval / MEMORANDUM • DATE: March 13, 1980 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: TRACT NO. 9423 The subject tract was approved by San Bernardino County on August 19, 1976. Due to the moratorium and various other time extensions, the tract expiration date is May, 1980. The tract is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Street and Beryl Street and consists of 22 lots. The developer, Coral Homes, has prepared the plans and documents for compliance with the conditions of approval and requests recording of the subject tract map. The developer has supplied the Engineering Division with an Agreement and securities, sufficient in nature, to insure orderly development. The type and amounts are as follows: performance Surety (Road) $137,500 Labor 6 Material Surety (Road) $137,500 • It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution directing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City Council and the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf of the City. The City Engineer shall forward the map for recording. Respe fully submitted, Lloyd B. Nubbs City Engineer LBR /ctr Iq{Vi HYVHI4 ``� TIz�.G'� N O �42 3 C. o ra A L rNV, 22 lobs C C • a 1 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9423 WHEREAS, The Tentative Map of Tract No. 9423, consisting of 20 lots, submitted by Coral Investments Subdivider, located on the west side of Beryl Avenue south of Base Line Road has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by adid City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and, 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and, 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the cer- tificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of March, 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: James C. Frost, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 21 • MEMORANDUM DATE: March 13, 1980 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: TRACT NO. 9444 The subject Final tract was approved by City Council on October 17, 1979. Along with an agreement and securities as follows: (TO BE RELEASED) Performance Letter of Credit (Road) $76,000 Labor 6 Material Letter of Credit (Road) $76,000 The tract is located on the northeast corner of Banyan Street and Amethyst Street and consists of 20 lots. The developer, Rancho De Cucamonga (Mark III Homes, Inc.), had prepared the plans and documents for compliance with the conditions of approval. Since that date they have sold the project to Fox Hollow Development (NUBANR INTERNATIONAL). Fox Hollow has supplied the Engineering Division with Replacement Agreements and securities, sufficient in nature, to insure orderly development. The type and amounts are as follows:(TO BE ACCEPTED) • Performance Surety (Road) $76,000 Labor S Material Surety (Road) $76,000 RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution directing the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf of the City. Also to hereby release the securities presently on file with the City Clerk. Respectfully submitted, l/� �,p� Lloyd B. Hobbs v� City Engineer LBH /ctr • 22 I I F W W K . N Z F W t LN ATIVE TRACT NQ. 944,e IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA • •tae ,. :.cw r r -L ..r..: :.,r n/ _ �rf. o:r.:. n. r.,,., :..Jf... ...x.: , ,n...., �1, •/•,qw L _raecr�•.•f..�_ and 4•H Iry u y.n !I') a rrrNw Aa1,(a ♦vJrL n: uJ Jn rtir fn n 4r () rnl, 4.I I:AI IaJ .r:J• r - -r r.v R ?/rff (I /YI AIrlI M L,1 T • •I l• IVLLi RESOLUTION NO. 80-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE- MENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration and Improvement Agreement executived on March 11, 1980, by Paul Coombs, President of Nubank International as Developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast corner of Amethyst and Banyan Streets, and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as Tract No. 9444; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient improvement security, which is Identified in said Improvement Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said improvement security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of March, 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: James C. Frost, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 24 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES I RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP TO PERSON OR PROPERTY CLAIM 0111GIaaL MR rile INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death. Injury to person or to personal property most be filed notr, later than 100 days after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) be filed not later than 1 the 1 T Y OF RAP OKO 2. Claims for damages to real property must year after CUCAMONGA occurance. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2) AC,'6; N!STR. ".TICfJ 3. Read entire claim before tiling. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. !��f)? 1 1950 9. Attach separate sheets, if necessary, to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET. 7. Claim must be filed with City Clerk. (Gov. Code Sec. 915x) ART PM 718j9A'11211i2jq j5I6 TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Name of Claimant Age of Claimant (if natural person) I •. S Home Address of Claimant �+ City nd State Lo.nlv.f�dG.yand Hdme Telephone Number State Business Address of Claimant Cily and State a of Claimant ussness Telephone Number Give address to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim rn da. Aly n How did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full par iculars. Wafe.v Co,+. ove, -�vo..0 tote f�,r.,/ve /1d 1ntirs+, $ wg/er 2n1 yn�l C'na,r /N OJf h1 ser /160111 S'a •('WJ r ♦MU6. /� C9J n (1005'. Oct, did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars, date, time of day: Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, and locate on diagram on reverse side o' this sheet, where appropriate, give street names and address and measurements from landmarks: (vby4�'ar�e /Jan 5Y NHv licM31 L° �i�.• y /7o/ What particular ACT or OMISSION do you claim caused the injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the injury or damage, if known: What DAMAGE or INJPRIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed: L1,Hs /,d 4,he heosG Cd, f e I- t AMULSI do you claim on account of each item of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this claim, mUtlon:�r runt �e ✓ 1- .: rN� ny lObor, yar.h. IC4 PC. dgY.�' tee,aa,`.1 °1<dnPea,._ /00. O. p0- W,Y /9 n, do. 6a. .o,,.un ,.;u naiucN'P as tar 09 known you claim on account of each item of prospecuvo injury or da ip mage, giving bans o Oo= w)riAiij}ys(G,.;,ay rt' >.,a, N.,,f�3brdr: r., •s� �fs�siald�yLC: 00 y rrCWakrsnV/ a.v HA. nvi /. OFj /he err Jnd OV 4,(e, ve, OD re°'r ""GCA.Mr OF SEE rice 2 (OVER) MIS CLAIM MUST 13E SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE Insurance Payments received, if any, and names of insurance Company: Expenditures made on account of accident or injury: (Date — item) (Amount) • Doctors and Hospitals: READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims place on following diagram names of streets, including North, East, South, and West; indicate place of accident by "S" and by showing house numbers of distances to street corners. If City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B" location of yourself or your vehicle when you first saw City vehicle; location of City vehicle at time of accident by "A-l" and location of yourself or your Vehicle at the time of the accident by B -1" and the point of impact by '7C.$, NOTE: if diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a proper diagram signed by claimant. FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS Z11SIDEWALK 7� CJrs•db a {• CUR PARKWAY SIDEWALK / Gs >'S I ,L) FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS ,Alm Signature of Claimnt or person filing on his behalf giving Typed Name: Date relali nsIn to imanp NOTE: Pfe'sentation of a false claim is a felony (Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 77). CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITH CITY CLERK (GOV. CODE SEC. 915x). Utz• o R ANCHO G �, March 7, 1980 CUCAMONGAYm, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 1215 "0" Street Sacramento, California 95814 Gentlemen: Please accept this letter as a letter of protest for issuance of an alcoholic beverage license for the business described on the enclosed application. This business is an existing automobile service station which will require physical modifications to accommodate the sale of alcoholic beverages plus any food items. Such improvements are required to be reviewed and approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to such sales. The applicant has not filed an application for this review and the City has not approved any such conversion of the service station to permit the sale of beverages or food. If the applicant successfully receives approval for such conversion by the City, then we will have no objection to the issuance of such license. If you have any questions or comments relative to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. • Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MICHAEL VAIRIN Associate Planner MV:kds cc: City Manager Senior Planner • 27 POST OFFICE BOX 793, RANCIIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 989 -18sl C0PY De Irw d. a.h —bwr» dF oPi•s M Net Write Above This Dee—F. McNgwo.ere ole.e APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) To: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 1215 O Street Socromento, Calif. 95814 Can Rcrna=1100 reLrmel+<epI »a.a<naa »I The undersigned hereby applies far licenses described as follows: 1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO, WP SATE BEER Et W= Applied under Sr ♦24044 ❑ Effective Date: l�y 80 FEE NO. GEOGRAPHICAL CODF6y5 Date , Issued 2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) Temp. Permit 1 Effective Date: e 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE LIC. TYPE S gn AMIAT 13-70 4. Nome of fl iness isaaca Q:cvron ServiTE tion 5. Location of Business— Number and Street 8687 Baseline Rd* i City and Zip Code County RaachO C 7 C RECEIPT NO. 61262 TOTAL $ 9 6. If Premises Licensed, v 7. Are Premises Inside Show Tvae of License a City Limits? Yes Mailing Address (if different from 5)— Number and Street 9. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic No Beverage Control Act or regulations of the Deportment per• twining w the Act ? /YD 11. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on on attachment which shall be deemed part of this application, 12. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sate licensed premises will, have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will Pict violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of —San B0)000 Lft*. ................Data ...... 2126 %BD ........ ._ ........ _.. uMw revelry el pri.., wed, pe.en whoa d2n.m. eppen bbw, ewtin., eM wvs: Its He i. IN eppli<eel, w .rw N the acme...., a .eno ee<a of the applimm <wporolion, mmed in the loreenome epplimlien, dull enhwi.ed to mmYe IN, ow1kaliew an it. bhelh 191 Hwr he 6, Pied no 1»e. pirq apphanion end In—, the < Ihwwl eM Ihal w<h end ell 0 Ib aWemwk. INI mode e ; III tMI rw pew elfin own Me e.s,= eppimenu Ire, ... de..1 or indvnln i' rb oeetfconK w aveli<omi bsi;wu to b <oMwhd ende r rb Unews) fee which this alwlinlion 4 .hose; Ni Owl Ib I m4r cpelimrien er prpevd <Irentlw 1 monde r < ;<h Ib p el a lean ev le lulnll on cerement .meted inw mare Then ni ery ren ones arwMineerhe day on wh ;eh IN, mbr ppft,tia i, filed with Ib Deper a pain w wbblBh a pelwewe la w Iw ep <leeiler 0 hen have w M ALmrd w Inlen any ned:Iw of oomlwer; I51 not rb Iwmbr oPo4mlion mar the wlrhdrewn ey either the aIne—M Inn I ;T.fe Ih'.0 -16ne 1hown, to d S nho oepenmenl. / 4 V ai 14. APPLICANT q / yy �7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCARIONGA SIGN HERE .... .; 6�Y /r.•6.;.AOd?a. -.... _ ... .....AONIT(1STR::TInry .......... ...........:...� ld ............................. .. .. . .......... ,... .,....;. .., ........ ......_. F. IAO..... T.. 14R1 ...... ........... ......... .. APPLICATION Y TRANSFEROR ^^ Pp 718191PI llIp11121si1415(8 15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of ... ..... ......., ::. ate .... ...... ............. ...... DnNr Porous N privy. each pwwn wore first. epees. b.. w nd w <: Its He ion Ib he..... a ..ennins A N the <., PPn II<wlw rswees M IN lwepins tnrnlw .wnewiw, du;, • - .." n —1. she I wow spIk.new on t. hesell: 121 IMInM Neste, week« eeelk.hw le ewrfeew 0 NMeeI M IN smebo I;mrwai d.enbd IMerr BM I. eneM eeme I. IM whoUnm sM /w 1.0- iM1ceM m 1N worse Wi- N e,h "Ohotwn feel. H erdr Provoke D os rem" Y, not Dinume; 121 Mof IN I.nefe, epellewlw: w perssed hwreler 1e net mode x W1101 the eornem 0 • 4w he w MNI w opens. bowed IIM mere Mw nlr»ry Me oreeN;M fN M, we wNelr the Irenel.r awlu. iw ion 51N wish IN D.p.e:Iem, we N MM w xsehim Ph .Nwene. 1e w Iw -1 wd;Iw 0 ...f.. er 4 du." w intent sn, .eebw el nenderw: PI Ihe, IN nsml. owl ;uliw we., b wnlMs.. \, e11Mr ex CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: March 12, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR BASE LINE WIDENING Attached for Council review is the Summary of Bid Results for the Base Line Widening contract. The low bidder was Crowell and Larson at $39,789.82. The Engineers estimate for the project is $49,073.00. The staff has reviewed the bid and qualification of the low bidder and recommended award of the contract. RECOM4ENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve award of the Base Line Widening project to Crowell and Larson and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute contract documents. Also, the Council approved • authorization to fund the contract amount of $39,789.82 plus a 10% contingency and $2,000.00 for construction staking. Respectfully submi teed, Lloy B. Hubbs City Engineer LBH:cd Attachment r ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 316 East'E' Street ONTARIO CALIFORNIA 91764 (714) 986.5818 TO GiTY Of tk&G to Gn ca AnoN 6c� Li, ^;ro ;,rte mfx f;.&;rk0 Ci;cr+hcN( AI OA 01091 ILE UEa OF 1MOSOMoTTpa .N'I E � _ clll -NIa .��c.cr GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU 14'Atteched ❑ Under separate cover via the following Items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ prints 0 Plans ❑ Samples 0 Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order 11A L_ I c"T�''TC COMES DATE W.— O Approved as submitted I 3-10 -3d 'L � UJE t,JtD NtJ Qr �c-�- JL- al•.iEE¢'S 61 cos, — As requested O Returned for corrections ❑ Ratum_ corrected prints ES O ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 D PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked bnlaw. ❑ For approval O Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval For your use 0 Approved as poled 0 Submit_coples for distribution As requested O Returned for corrections ❑ Ratum_ corrected prints ❑ For review and comment O ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 D PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS p Y M pw iGc- �PLK..1'C �k27, A'M raw rr. ee.+a•� ®n.�rvrn•r. w aaN .• .,a n.r .• ml.e. Wewr early .• .1 .n•.. BASE L /ivE W /OENAVC 11RO✓6C7- BETWEEN B6.PYL ST E L /047 3Y 3- /O -BD • I1'Pa'i UIII'I' ql h:5'I'IpLI'I'I':U I'I'P;N 1'11119;0 TOW. NO. Il'XM MEASHHE UUAN'1'J'1'Y (IN Fl Glll(l':S) 1N FIGURES I 1 '' REMOVAL5,1 CLEARING GRUBBING, LS LUMP SUM /4 500 141500. AND R6CUNSTIIUC7'ION. 2 EXCAVATION AND ASPHALT CY 535 7'50 CONCRE'T'E REMOVAL' 4,015 3 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT.: ;, TON;' '. 120 3750 Q BOO. 4 CUSS 2 AGGREGATE BASE SF 4,838 /.00 (1.2 - FEET THICK) 5 • CONCRET'E 8" CUR B W /18" �:. LF. 456 9,50 GUTI'Eli 4,332. '8 CONCRETE 6" CURD W /18" LF 18 9, 50 /7/. OUTTLH 7 " CONCmn. SIDIiWALK 6 WHEEL- SF 2,217 /.60 3,547. CHAIR RAMP (4" THICK) 8, CONCREFF, DRIVE APPROACH SF 579 3300 / 737. (6" THICK) /. •9 CONCItK'I'E CROSS GUTTER .I SF .386 7-T /gL48• (INCL. IN'T'EGRAL CITRUS) -3. 10 CONCRE'T'E MASONRY RI.00K WALL LF 156 20.00 3,120. (48" IIEIGJlT - 8" WIDTH BLOCK ll '• PECONS'rHUCT EXISTING CON- 'CBB'fr: ' SF 2,232 3.00 UNIV11WAY (6" THICK) 6,696. 31 FA llr / OF 2 Iri TOTAL (IN WORDS) Dollars • firm NO ITEM mi i7i-)i QUAN'ri i y (IN p I M)RES1 1(11*11 IN YMUPES 12 8!'.ASPIIAI,T CONCRETE DIKE LF 38 4.5-0 171. EST/MATE 1 TOTAL 0 49,07-9. TOTAL (IN WORDS) Dollars • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BUNMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED PROJECT BASE LINE WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN BERYL STREET AND LION STREET LOCATION BERYL STREET AND LION STREET DATE MARCH 10. 198n CONTRACT NO. E ITEMS QUANTITIES - SCRAM - WALTERS Bid Amount SO CAL WEST Bid Amount JEG CONSTRUCTION Bid Amount LAIRD Bid Amount CROWELL /LAFS04 Bid Amount Bid Amount Bidder's Bond Removals, Clearing Grubbing, LUMP ILS 6,000 6,000 11,000 11,000 12,100 12,100 9,000 9,000 4,000 4,000 and Reconstruction SUM Excavation and Asphalt 535 CY 12.00 6,420.00 8.00 4,280.00 5.20 2,782.00 18.50 9,897.50 8.90 4,761.50 Concrete Removal Asphalt Concrete Pavement 120 TON 47.00 5,640.00 40.00 4,800.00 50.00 6,000.00 40.00 4,800.00 49.00 5,880.00 ( CLASS 2 AGGREGATE Base 4,830 SP 1.20 5,805.60 .96 4,644.48 . .80 3,870.40 .80 3,870.40 .94 4,547.72 (1.2 - FEET THICK) CONCRETE 6" CURB W /18" 456 •P 8.25 3,762.00 7.80 3,556.80 8.75 3,990.00 7.80 3,556.80 7.60 3,465.60 GUTTER CONCRETE 6'• CURB W /18" 18 LF 8.25 148.50 7.80 140.40 8.75 157.50 7.80 140.40 7.60 136.80 GUTTER CONCRETE SIDEWALK b WHEEL- 2,217 SP 1.40 3,103.80 1.40 3,103.80 1.70 3,768.90 1.50 3,225.50 1.60 3,547.20 CHAIR RAMP (4'• THICK) CONCRETE DRIVE APPROACH 579 SF 2.00 1,158.00 1.80 1,042.20 2.40 1,389.60 2.50 1,447.50 2.00 1,158.00 (6" Thick) CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 386 SF 5.50 2,123.00 4.00 1,544.00 5.00 1,930.00 4.00 1,544.00 3.50 1,351.00 (INCL. INTEGRAL CURBS) CONCRETE PASOAW1 BLCCK WALL 156 LF 40.00 6,240.00 26.00 4,056.00 42.00 6,552.00 30.00 4,680.00 36.00 5,616.00 (43" HEIGHT - 8" WIDTH BL00 RECONSTRUCT EXISTING CC '1- 2,232 F 2.00 4,464.00 1.80 4,017.60 2.40 5,356.80 2.50 5,580.00 2.25 5,022.00 CRETE DRIVEWAY (6" THICK) I i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED BASE LINE STREET WIDENING BETWEEN BERYL STREET AND LION STREET MARCH 10, 1980 CONTRACT N0, " ENGINEER'S ITEMS QUANTITIES SCRAM - WALTERS SO CAL WEST JEG :CONSTRUCTION LAIRD CROWELLILA(ESON ESTIMATE Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Amount Bid Ar..ount Bid Amount Bidder's Bond - B' ASPHALT CONCRETE DIKE 38 LF 10.00 380.00 5.00 190.00 8.75 332.50 6.00 228.00 8.00 304.00 TOTALS: 45,244.90 42,375.28 48,229.70 47,970.10 39,789.82 $49,073 ( NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO EXERCISE RIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR DRAIN- AGE AND FLOWAGE PURPOSES. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Pro- cedure Section 1245.235, that on Wednesday, March 19, 1980, at 7:00 p.m. at 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, you will have the opportunity to appear and to be heard on the following matters relative to the proposed "Resolution of Nec- essity" attached hereto and intended to be adopted by the City Countil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the gov- erning board of said City: (1) Whether the public interest and necessity require the project described in the proposed Resolution of Necessity; (2) Whether the project is planned or located, or planned and located, in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and, (3) Whether the property sought to be acquired is neces- sary for the project. Failure to file a written request to appear and to be heard within fifteen (15) days after the date of this Notice will result in waiver of the right to appear and be heard. • A written request to appear and to be heard may be filed with the City Clerk, 9320 -C Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia 91730. NOTE: The scheduled Hearing will not be concerned with the fair—market value of the property sought to be acquired through the right of eminent domain. Information regarding the fair market value appraisal of the property may be obtained by calling Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney, at (714) 983 -9393. DATED: February 20, , 1980. LAUREN M. WASSERMAN, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California BY: V. ?,Ail ot.a(�: L& verly Authelet Deputy City Clerk -w 35 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: February 8, 1980 RE: Resolution of Necessity (Teasdale Property). You will recall that the original Resolution of Necessity in this matter, which the City Council adopted on November 15, 1978, was defective in that reference to the particular state law authorizing condemnation was omitted. Althought we discov- ered this fact shortly after the commencement of the lawsuit, we did not then take corrective action because it appeared that we might be able to arrive at a settlement with Mr. Teasdale. Further, his attorney indicated that even if the matter could not be settled, he would not make an issue out of the defective Resolution. It now appears that we will have to go forward with the litigation. Teasdale's attorney has not responded to our last settlement offer made October 9, 1979, even though I have sent him two (2) follow -up letters, the last one being mailed on January 16, 1980. I am, therefore, enclosing the following: (1) A new Notice of Hearing regarding proposed Resolu- tion of Necessity (etc.); and, (2) A new Resolution of Necessity (with respect to the Teasdale property). The Resolution of Necessity should be set for hearing on • the City Council agenda of March 1, 1980. The original Notice of Hearing, to which a copy of the Resolution is attached, must be mailed by your office, first- . class mail, postage prepaid, addressed to: MR. R. D. TEASDALE 400 East Las Palmas Drive Fullerton, California 92635. The Notice of Hearing should be mailed as soon as possible but in no event later than sixteen (16) days prior to the hearing date. An Affidavit of Mailing should be completed and retained in the permanent records of the City Clerk. Please note that Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.240 requires that the Resolution of Necessity be adopted by a vote of • two - thirds (2/3) of all the members of the City Council. In ef- fect, this means four (4) affirmative votes. If you have any question, please give me a call. RED: sqg Enclosures 37 -2- • RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO EXERCISE RIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE PURPOSES. • RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cuca- monga, California: The public safety, welfare, convenience, interest and nec- essity require the acquisition by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, of the property hereinafter described for public use, to wit: for the maintenance of storm drains and other structures for the drainage and flowage of water. That the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to acquire the property by eminent domain pursuant to Government Code Section 37350.5. That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and determines that: (1) The public interest and necessity require the pro- posed project. (2) The proposed project is planned, or located, or planned and located, in the manner that will be the most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. • (3) The property described herein is necessary for the proposed project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized to acquire, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the following described lands by donation, purchase or by condemnation in accordance with the provisions of the Constitu- tion of the State of California and the laws of the State of Cali- fornia relating to eminent domain. That the City Attorney of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby authorized and instructed to prepare and prosecute, in the name of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, such suit or suits in the lawful Court having jurisdiction thereof as is necessary to con- demn said lands for the purposes hereinabove described. The real property to which the City of Rancho Cucamonga is, by this Resolution, authorized to acquire is situate, lying and being in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernar- dino, State of California, and is particularly described as fol- lows: The Easterly 20.00 feet of the westerly 92.00 feet of Parcel No. 3 of Parcel Map No. 65 as per plat recorded in Book 1 of Parcel Maps, page 49, records of • said County. PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on , 1980, by the following vote.: 7R ^/ AYES: (�j( ATTEST: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk • • • • 400 East Les Palmas Drive Fullerton, California 92635 (714) 525 -5953 February 27, 1980 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk 9320 -C Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re, Request to Appear and be Heard on March 19, 1980 Dear Mr. Wassermann This letter acknowledges recent receipt of NOTICE OF HEARING for Wednesday, March 19, 1980, 7v00 PM at 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California re Proposed Resolution No. on Eminent Domain. • Please note that no Resolution No. Is given on your NOTICE OF HEARING. This letter also is my written request to appear and to be heard at said Hearing on March 19, 1980. cc - Mrs. Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk • Yours truly, sd1 ku& R. D. Teasdale, Owner 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA HMORANDUM Date: March 19, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: PI.UESS- STAUFER APPEAL The Pluess - Staufer project is a proposed 80 acre industrial calcium carbonate processing plant to be located between 8th Street and 6th Street, west of Rochester. The processing facility will include rock rail unloading and storage facility, rock crushing and grinding facilities, storage silos, bagging and warehousing facilities, rail car and truck loading facilities, and maintenance buildings and an office building. The Planning Commission gave final approval of the Pluess- Staufer facility on January 9, 1980. However, he Commission did approve the site layout on November 19, 1979. . The Planning Commission waited for final approval in order • to give Pluess- Staufer an opportunity to revise their landscaping plans to be more consistent with the objectives of the Citv in promoting well designed projects that reflect a high quality. The challenge for Pluess- Staufer was to design the site and create design elements compatible with the area. The largest structure on the facility is to be 105 feet high and the raw materials stock pile is to be 40 feet making this facility a very visually prominent feature. Had the facility located east of the freeway near the existing heavy industries, difficulties in buffering would not be as complex. However, the Pluess- Staufer plant is proposed in the heart of an area in which planned industrial parks are either in the design stages or have already been approved. Therefore, visual relief and other environmental concerns such as noise and dust attenuation are important to the compatibility of the Pluess- Staufer use with the future of planned industrial activities in the area. It was the concern of the Planning Commission, the Staff, the City of Ontario, and adjacent property owners that if the use goes in, it mist be made to be compatible through proper buffering. The Planning Com- mission approved the facility with conditions that required appropriate landscape buffering. These conditions for bufforin_y care the subject of the nDpeal. Staff originally had suggested a solution that would provide hoth wind attenuation, dust suppression and visual buffering utilizing a technique such as the one at the Padua Substation on 161-h Street, but to a lesser scale. Staff suggested 6' earth mounding with wind screening on top of that and heavy landscaping with vertical trees planted on the perimeter. Pluess- Staufer objected stating that Industrial use did not require any of these buffers. A Planning Commission sub - committee subsequently met to work with Pluess- Staufer to find a compromise solution. That compromise solution was found in the elimination of the wind fencing on the mounds and 6' 41 Pluess - Staufer Appeal Page 2 mounding would only be in key areas with the rest of the perimeter developed • in an undulating form with heavy landscaping. No mounding would be necessary for a larger portion of the western side of the facility because of John O'Donnel.'a industrial park development. The 6' mounding was required in critical view areas, those primarily from developed streets and in areas where prominent wind patterns are evident. The frontage portion on 6th Street is the standard landscape require- ment that is required for everyone in the City on a Special Boulevard. The Pluess - Staufer group indicated this would be an acceptable concept therefore, the last remaining buffering condition returned to the Planning Commission for the final approval in January. When the compromise was worked out the Sub - Committee and Pluess- Staufer worked out concepts through discussions from a plan which was significantly red penciled and returned to Pluess- Staufer for final plan revision. When the plans returned to the Planning Commission as a full Commission, the final plans basically reflected the considerations of the sub - committee. However, a couple of areas did not conform to the discussions{ primarily the southwest corner of the site and that area directly behind the raw materials stock pile. These areas were to include higher mounding (6') because of the visibility from the streets and the need for wind attenuation for the raw materials stock pile. The deletion of the original 6' mounding on the western property line was to begin only at the point where John O'Donnel's industrial buildings began. Since it was agreed the new buildings would provide some relief, only a row of trees would be planted instead of mounding and landscaping. However, that portion of the corner which would be exposed to view from 6th Street did not have the taller berming on Pluess- Staufer's final plan. Consequently, the Planning Commission approved the project in January • with the conditions that the landscaping be augmented in these two areas. The Planning Commission felt that this section of the industrial area shows the greatest promise for the development of fine industrial parks for Rancho Cucamonga especially with the arrival of many interesting planning prospects that would create a dynamic and pleasing job environment for Rancho Cucamonga. It is, there- fore, imperative that any industry allowed within the zone be designed properly and be sensitive to the need to mitigate visual and other problems to assure the greatest compatible relationship between land uses. Without adequate buffering for the Pluess- Staufer plant, the Planning Commission and Staff believe that the facility would be incompatible with the scale and types of uses that are being proposed and built in the Rancho Cucamonga industrial area. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of Staff and the Planning Commission that the Appeal. be denied and the Planning conditions for landscape buffering be upheld. Resp� L bmiL M JACK IAM, Director of Community Development JL:nm r' n U U.S.G.S. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP . \`_ ra• ai _ _ anorw •. L p. 11 '12 OWL _ rr ANO S..N1A AE .rd ® OPE �..r .f �r is e, a :� fProject Site t.,. tli�iaO MUiUH 51111LI WAV x� \ <1 9'SCALE Va 2000' J. Jack Ltm stated on Fob niarg 19, I- FO at 7:00 p.m., a meeting will. be held at the Neighborhood Community' Center which will he a joint City/ Commission Energy Workshop. The program revolves around energy conserva- tion. Mr. Fred Etzel of Sedway /Cooke will be present at this meeting and hopes to provide information and educational materials to the Commis- sion and Council at that meeting. A representative from the Solar Office from the State of California, a conservation person from the Energy Com- mission, and perhaps someone from the Office of Planning and Research will be present. Two speakers will talk about energy conservation and tie. Fred Etzel will talk about policy implications and the context in which these kinds of issues would be integrated into the General Plan and what it means for Rancho Cucamonga. This will he a very informative workshop. 4. Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reported GVD (developers of Lbe proposed Goren site) have indicated they would like to come back before the Design Review Committee on January 22, 1980 at 4:00 p.m. if possible. lie asked Commissioners Garcia and Dahl, members of the Design Review Committee, if they would be able to meet at this time. Commissioners Garcia and Dahl indicated they woad be able to meet at the above specified time. • 5. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the C d L Tract in the north part of the City had a problem in December because the Corp. of Engineers cut off the direct route to their tract and the sign as the City now allows was insufficient. oft Barry Hogan worked out a solution to this problem with C. h 1. so that during • chc construction by the Corp. of Engineers, C F L was allowed some signing which would Lead to this tract. It is time that the Commission and public realizes that we do work very rlosely with the public and their problems. � x • k CONSENT CALENDAR Upon motion by Commissioner Totstoy and seconded by Commissioner Dahl, the following consent calendar items were approved as submitted: A. Negative Declaration for Parcel Map Nn. 5581 - Edward J. Feduniw B. Negative Declaration for Parcel Map - Dave Long DIRECTOR RRVTrd NO. 79 -12 - PLUFSS- S'I'AIT ER - Rovirw of lnnd,rnp, and berming rrgn itrments for the Iimo SL Oar grinding and pro r.rseing plan located on RO acres of land In the M -2 zone on the earth side of Sixth Street, 1,200' west of Rochester. Michael Vairin, Asezor Into Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Stnff recommends that i.hr Planning Commission npprovo the roareptnnl Innd.ccnp,• plans as submitted by the applicant with the iddiLinnil berms as described within the Staff Report and require that detailed Inndscapr and irrigation plane be submitted Ito the Planning Division Staff for final review and approval prior to issuance of • building permiLS. Planning Commission Minutes ( January 9, 1980 E 6 `• q1 ;n Chairman Rempel asked for questions from tite Commission of the staff. Chairman Rempel stated he didn't believe the Design Review Committee was that critical as far as berming on the north property boundary due to the fact that there really is no development in that area, and the property is owned by Pluess- Staufer. lie stated it is necessary however that mounding come back around the earner and the remaining area be densely landscaped. He stated it is also important that wind fences be installed around the plant especially in the vineyard area to keep dust from blowing. Commissioner Toistoy stated the berm should be. wrapped around to at least 300' so that the berm could come up to the building line of the adjacent project. lie further stated in regard to the type of plants approved for this development it is very important that they be looked at very carefully to insure that the plants selected are compatible with our local conditions. A notfon was made by Commissioner Tol.tny and sconndod by CarnniaxiOner Junes to approve the landscape and berming requirements for Director Review No. 79 -32 subject to the following conditions; 1. A detailed wind fence plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for this project. 2. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Six (6) feet earth hertss shall he installed on the north side of the material piles. 6. The earth helm along 6th Street shall be carried around the west property line to a depth of 300' from 6th Street. AYES: TOLSTOY, .]ONES, DAHL, GARCIA, R@1PEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE A • • * k APPEAL OF DIRECTOR REVIEW NO_ 79 -70 FOR DIVERSIFIED INVESTNENT_COMPANY - Appeal I +y Td Young of the minor site plan revision for th- shopping center located on the southeast earlier of Rase Line and Archibald. Illchnrl Vairin, A•:reelatr Planner, rrviewed the staff repoil in detall, this bring out file in the planning Division. Staff rernmmrnds that the Planning Comm] sion "0o'ill or the Opt in na nvai lnble and doe ide Whc I rr or not to affirm, rrverr:r or modify Nsr dveislon of the Director of Community Dovelapment for Director Review No. 79 -70. COmmissionpr 1'olstov c<ta Ud Iho Cile is plavcd in an awkward position here since the County rvvi,wed and approved Lhis prol,Vt. Hu asked if there is any ingress and egress to building "E° proposed to the rear of the buildings. Planning Commission minnt os -� January 9, 1980 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • PLANNING COMMISSION M S November 19, 1979 Adjourned Meeting CALL TO ORDER The adjourned meeting of the Planning Commission of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, was held in the Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility, 9791 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucamonga, on Monday, November 19, 1979. Meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Chairman Rempel. * x x x x ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Herrman Rempel, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl ALSO PRESENT: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Michael Vairin, Associate Planner; Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer; Paul Rougeau, Associate Civil Engineer; Ted Hopson, City Attorney; and . Nancy McAllister, Secretary • x x x x PUBLIC HEARINGS CERTIFICATION OF FINAL EIR FOR THE PLUESS- STAUFER FACILITY -b R -x�\_ 'a. 6, 2 Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report in detail. Staff recommended that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 79 -69 which certifies the Final EIR and Resolution No. 79 -70 approving the site plans for the project. Chairman Hempel asked for questions from the Commission of the staff. Commissioner Jones stated during the Santana winds, there will be problems of dust blowing in this area. She asked if it is felt with the berming and land- scaping of the site that it will help alleviate some of the dust problems. Michael Vairin stated the berming and landscaping will help alleviate the problem; however, it is probable that dust could be carried off the site during heavy winds. The site is within an existing vineyard and not all of the site will be cleared at the time of development. By leaving vineyards in the open areas will also help keep the dust down. Commissioner Tolstoy asked where the rail line comes into the facility. . l K/ • Mr. Vairin reviewed this for the Commnission. There being no further questions from the Commission of the staff, Chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. George Leonhard, Project Manager for Pluess - Staufer Corp., stated they plan to develop in a good, clean manner and be a good neighbor in the community. The project will be beyond the requirements of the air pollution control district. Mr. Frank Cooney, Director of the County Economic Development Department, stated his observation in visiting other Pluess- Staufer sites is that it has been a clean operation. Mr. Leonhard stated he takes exception to the condition requiring earth mounding plus a 6' high solid fence on top of that mounding. Due to the large area involved with this development he does not feel this mounding and fence would accomplish anything and would be very expensive for them. Mr. Jim Gan from Pluess- Staufer, stated the architecture of this plant is first quality and will be of the finest industrial standards. He really does not under- stand the 6' high banning and fence requirement. They are not trying to hide the fact that this is an industrial plant. This will add a great deal to the project cost and will accomplish nothing as he sees it. Chairman Rempel stated from his knowledge, the applicant is proposing to landscape • only very small areas of the total site. The areas that are left open will cause a lot of dust to blow during times of heavy winds. There will be a lot of exposed dirt and stock - piling of materials in that area which will be an eye sore. He added there are existing vineyards in the area; however, if these vineyards are not irri- gated, in a couple of years they will be totally gone. Commissioner Tolstay added this entire area is within a dust control zone of San Bernardino County. Therefore, it is his opinion the dust problem could be a poten- tially great problem. It is his opinion the berming and landscaping as indicated by staff is very important. Mr. Leonard indicated that rocks that come into the plant will already be screened and washed. Because of that, little if any dust will be brought in from the rocks. He stated the winds will travel a certain direction in the area and perhaps the solution would be to screen the site in the direction that the wind blows. It is his opinion this would be adequate to prevent dust from blowing on the site and would also not require the total berming and fencing of the site. He stated they are required to take measures to abate dust which is required by the Agricultural Depart- ment. They are fully prepared to comply with the requirements of the Agricultural Department. Chairman Rempol stated berming on the perimeter of the site would serve two purposes. The higher you get any type of planting around the perimeter, the more you are going to huild a barricade for the wind, and will also act as a landscaped feature. The berming and landscaping is not only required for wind but also for blocking the view of the stockpiling within the development. Planning Commission Minutes -2- November 19, 1979 Mr. Lam indicated the reason for the landscaping is also to enhance the site • in terms of projects to be developed around the site as they will be of light industrial character. Light and heavy industrial projects that have been approved all have required landscaped screening. Compatibility of land uses is an impor- tant issue that needs to be addressed and resolved. Mr. Leonard proposed that they get together to develop an alternative plan to a• shield areas that will need to be screened without having to go to the extensive berm Ing and fencing. Chairman Rempel stated it is his opinion berming is aesthetically very pleasing. . Perhaps a chain link fence with slats could be considered. Commissioner Jones stated the type of fence to be required should be considered as during heavy winds she has seen fences blown down. The fence should be strong enough not to be blown down during the winds. Mr. Vito DeVito Francesco, stated his family has been active in the grape business for many years. At the present time they farm the property to the west of this property and other properties in the surrounding area. He stated the height of the fence required will not have too much benefit from protecting the site from the winds. The best source of protection is a row of trees. The berm and fence might be aesthetic but another problem in this area is the tumble weed problem. The tumble weeds will accumulate in this area. Chairman Rempel asked what are the plans as far as the open area? Will the vineyards be irrigated? . Mr. Leonard stated yes, the vineyards will be maintained. He asked if the Commission would accept putting slats into the chain link fence. They have more area then they consider the project site at this point. They would be willing to fence the appro- priate area to provide security and at the same time would put the slats into the chain link fence. Commissioner Garcia stated it is his opinion there is a combination of things that can be considered to work out the problem of the berming and fencing of the project. He asked for an explanation of the traffic and circulation aspect. He is Interested in the time schedule for the improvement of 6th Street. Lloyd Hubbs stated there are a couple of options available. We are working on an assessment district for this area which will Include 6th Street from Haven to Rochester, the construction of Milliken three quarters of the way from 4th Street, and a portion of Cleveland. This is going to the Council soon for their review and approval. If that assessment district moves ahead as planned, it could be coordinated with the completion of this project. This developer will be responsible for the por- tion fronting their property. A security will be required for the road prior to issuance of building permits and the road will need to be In prior to occupancy. Commissioner Garcia asked if there will be a problem with waste disposal. Mr. Vairin stated at the present time they are proposing to discharge the waste into the Cucamonga County Sewer System. An industrial waste line is available if it is found that the discharge is not acceptable. • Planning Commission Minutes -1- November 19, 1979 • Sue Lamoureux from the Planning Center, stated their firm prepared the EIR for this project. The Cucamonga County Water District intends to receive waste from the project. If for some reason the sewage is much stronger or there are more industrial particles, there is an industrial sewer located nearby. Commissioner Garcia stated at this time fire protection is very limited in our community. He asked if in -house fire protection will be considered. Mr. Leonhard stated they will definitely put in an in -house fire protection system including a fire loop around the plant and fire hydrants every 150 feet. The buildings themselves were required to be fire sprinklered and areas that can not be sprinklered will require other measures. The entire system is tied to the City water supply which they have been told is adequate. With the appropriate manpower they can fight any fire that may occur. Commissioner Garcia asked what the economic impact of this development will be. He has not seen any real indication of the benefit this development will have to our community. Sue Lamoureux reviewed this for the Commission. The relationship of this project to the economic welfare of the City is the generation of employment for potential or existing residents of the City and that those employees of the plant will either live or spend their dollars in the community. There are no guarantees that employees will live in the City or will spend their money in the City but typically some of the employees will spend their money in the City. A facility of this nature does . not require a large amount of City services. The City will get more back in property taxes in terms of revenue to the City. The cream ic analysis is primarily discussed in broad terms rather than specific terms. Mr. Frank Cooney stated the Pluess Staufer firm is already involved in a training program with his office and with the State of California EDD. They are, as part of their ongoing employment policy taking people who are CETA eligible and signing training agreements with them. They are willing to hire people that come off the street who are unemployed. In his opinion this is a significant economic impact. Mr. Ben Mackall, Foothill Fire District, stated at this type of a facility, they would expect more emergency medical calls then fire type calls. With the response time, it might take some time before they would be able to get to the site. They would like to see that the company have specialized training on the job site in first aid. This could help save a heart attack victim or stoppage of breathing getting to the critical point before the fire department could respond. This training should be highly encouraged. Mr. Leonhard stated it is part of their ongoing policy to have training as far as safety is concerned. They do plan to have employee training sessions at this site. Commissioner Garcia asked about possible noise that will come from the site. Mr. Leonhard stated as far as noise they have little if any equipment that is classed as highly objectionable noise generating equipment. They do noise monitoring as . part of their program because of employee safety. If there is an area that has high noise, they would take appropriate measures to mitigate the noise. By mitigating any noise levels that might occur for employee safety, it will also mitigate noise that would bother people around the site. Planning Commission Minutes _4- November 19, 1979 Commissioner Garcia stated the major issue is the berming and aesthetic aspects • of this facility. Mr. ;:ike Azeka, Planning Center, stated in regard to the berming and landscaping, perhaps this could be discussed further. Perhaps a combination of smaller berms and walls and possibly incorporating more trees would be a much more acceptable suggestion then having a 6' berm around the facility. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman P.empel closed the public hearing. A motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Jones to adopt Resolution No. 79 -69 as submitted. AYES: TOLSTOY, JONES, GARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: DAHL DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -32- PLUESS- STAUFER - The development of a limestone grinding and processing plant located on BO acres of land in the M -2 zone on the north side of Sixth Street, 1,200' west of Rochester. Chairman Rempel asked for the concensus of the Commission regarding having a design review sub - committee on the landscaping and berming of the project and bring back that portion to the Commission for a full review. He asked Mr. Leonhard if he felt a landscaping plan could be brought back for review. Mr. Leonhard stated yes, this would not be a problem for them and would ask that • a meeting be set for further review of this problem. Jack Lam asked that the Commission note the changes to the Resolution as indicated in the memorandum which was handed out this evening. Four of the conditions in the Resolution have been reworded slightly and the memo adds three additional conditions. If it is the concensus of the Commission that the landscaped earth berms and fencing condition be reviewed by a sub - committee and brought back to the next Commission meeting, then condition 016 should be reworded to indicate this. Mr. Mackall stated if storage is to be located above the ground, that certain miti- gating measures need to be met to handle that storage in case of a fire. Mr. Lam indicated this is handled in the Resolution under Condition 045 and 46. ± A motion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Garcia to approve Resolution No. 79 -70 subject to the revisions and additions as stated in the memorandum from staff and that Condition 016 be revised to read as follows: Six foot landscnped earth berms and opaque fences or other mitigating measures shall be provided along the Sixth Street frontage, east and west property lines, and along the north side of the facilities. AYES: TOLSTOY, GARCIA, ,ZONES, RfMPEL NOES; NONE ABSENT: DAHL • �. Planning Commission Minutes -5-,-, November 19, 1979 • It was the concensus of the Commission that Commissioner Tolstoy and Chairman Rempel make up the sub - committee to meet with the I'luess- Staufer Company on the landscaping and fencing of the project. Upon Motion by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried, it was voted to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting of November 19, 1979. Meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. R especCful l submitted, tl su JACK LAM, Director of Community Development • • Planning Commission Minutes _6 i� November 19, 1979 M E M O R A N D U M Date: March 13, 1980 • To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Subject: Amendment to Historic Preservation Ordinance No. 70 The concerns expressed by both the Council and the Preservation Commission regarding protection of proposed historic sites during the "consideration process" are addressed by proposed amendment, 70 -C. The amendment is straight forward as to purpose, that is, a legal prohibition of alteration during the consideration process. violation of this subsection would carry penalty of up to six months in jail and /or a fine of up to MO. The Preservation Conmdssion unanimously voted to recommend to Council adoption of Ordinance 70 -C at their meeting on March 11, 1980. Request aganda date of 3/19/80 for Council consideration • BH /mw • S2 M E M O R A N D U M • TO: William L. Holley, Director of Community Services FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: February 14, 1980 RE: Ordinance Imposing Interim Ban on Material Changes to Proposed Landmarks. Enclosed please find an Ordinance which would impose an interim ban on material changes to a proposed landmark. This is the strongest possible measure, and it has been drafted as such per your suggestion. Should the Historic Preservation Commission wish it watered down, please advise. It is not necessary to put notification procedures in • the Ordinance. I believe that you should just set up an in- house procedure for notifying owners, occupants and appropriate City departments of the proposed designation and the provisions of the Ordinance prohibiting material change. RED:sgg Enclosure '3 • ORDINANCE NO. 70 -C • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 70 BY ADDING SUB- SECTION (h) THERETO TO PROHIBIT MATERIAL CHANGES ON PROPOSED LANDMARKS UNTIL FINAL ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 10 of Ordinance No. 70 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended by adding sub - section (h) thereto to read as follows: "(h) Except as otherwise provided in Section 16 of this Ordinance, it shall be unlawful for any person to carry out or cause to be carried out a material change on a proposed landmark until final action of the City Council, denying the proposed designation, is taken. ". SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall • cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published inn the City of � Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: • City Clerk Mayor 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rp7shT31101 � Date: March 19, 1980 To: City Council and City Manager From: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Subject: PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM Attached for Council review is a memo concerning the proposed Public Works budget for the 1980 -81 fiscal year. The purpose of the memo is to develop manpower and major equipment needs for Council review and approval. This will allow recruitment and acquisition processes to begin early enough to be in operation by July 30, 1980 when the County contract expires. The memo identifies the need for the addition of five full time maintenance workers and the acquisition through lease purchase of approximately $250,000 in equipment. The work program includes all needs for maintenance of streets, . traffic control, storm facilities, trees, parkways and parks. Where appli- cable contract amounts have been inserted. The program outlined continues basically the current level of maintenance service at a reduced cost to the City. In order to fully explore service options the staff has presented alternatives to increase the level of ser- vice in the areas of street sweeping, tree trimming and street sign mainten- ance. These areas are the areas in which we receive the most complaints from citizens and where there seems to be the greatest service demand within the community. As can be seen from the proposed program, increased service in any of these areas will involve substantial fund commitments on the part of the City. These funds will reduce funds available for capital improvements to the streets and drainage systems. Because the staff feels that capital needs should receive priority in the immediate future, we have recommended a con- tinuation of basically current levels. It should be mentioned that the proposed level of street sweeping is an increase over the current level of service and will involve the acquisition of a sweeper. This will allow a more immediate response to complaints in obvious problem areas. Staff has also recommended a medium level of street sign replacement in areas of the City. Park and parkway maintenance will continue at current levels showing only increases as additional areas are added. • 3� 1 Public Works Maintenance Program March 19, 1980 Page 2 RE00SLME\'DATIOH: It is recommended that the Council approve in concept the maintenance program as outlined and authorize the recruitment of staff and acquisition of equipment as follows: Additional Staff One Maintenance Worker III Two Maintenance Workers II Two Maintenance Workers I Maior Eauipment One asphalt patch truck* $45,000 Two dump trucks equipped with blade or loader 60,000 One street sweeper /catch basin cleaner 75,000 One front end loader with hoe and drag attachment 35,000 One full size pick -up truck 15,000 One utility vehicle 15,000 TOTAL $245,000 *Received prior Council authorization to solicit bids for patch truck which is now in progress. Respectfully submitted, LLOYD B. HOBBS City Engineer LBH:nm • • i n U I r• 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: MARCH 13, 1980 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: JACK LAM, Director of Community Development BY: BARRY K. HOGAN, Senior Planner SUBJECT: RESOLUTION TO IMPLEMENT LOCALLY CONTROLLED AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN MEASURES ABSTRACT: As the Council will recall, last year we brought before you a Resolution to implement the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) as adopted by SCAG and the SCAQMD. At that time the City Council did not adopt the Reso- lution. However, the plan was conditionally approved by the Air Resources Board and is now under consideration by the Environmental Protection Agency. As part of the approval process, SCAG is again asking the Cities and the Counties to formally adopt resolutions attesting to the City's intent to implement the measures which are under the City's direct control and form- ulate a time table for implementation. On February 6, 1980, the SANBAG Board endorsed those actions and agreed to take an active role in helping secure city actions. SANBAG is asking that the attached Resolution be approved by the City Council. In the Resolution the measures that are outlined are 1) Employee ride sharing; 2) traffic signal synchronization; 3) bike and pedestrian facilities; 4) energy conser- vation, street lighting; 5) modified work schedules; and 6) car pool preferential parking. We have reviewed each of the measures and the City's responsibility for implementation. It is our belief that the implementation of the measures would involve minimal staff effort and that some are already in the process of implementation such as energy conservation, street lighting, bike and pedestrian facility and traffic signal synchronization. RECOC4TEJDATION: If the City Council concurs that the measures delineated in the attached Resolution involve minimal staff effort and minimal cost to the City in implementation adoption of the Resolution is recommended. ReOpec tfu1 sI.itted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL; BH:cd Enclosure • RESOLUTION NO. 80 -29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INDICATING ITS INTENT TO IMPLiMENT PRIOR TO DECEMBER 31, 1982 HEREIN DEFINED "REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES" FROM THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.,) seeks to develop a cooperative federal, state, regional, and local government program to prevent and control air pollution in order to protect and enhance the quality of the nation's air resources so as to promote the public health and welfare of its population; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 172 (a) (1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) have prepared an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the South Coast Air Basin with the assis- tance of the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and the City of Los Angeles, the San Bernardino Associated Governments, and the State of California Air Resources Board (ARB); and WHEREAS, the AQMP was adopted by SCAG on January 25, 1979, by the SCAQMD on January 26, 1979, and was conditionally approved by the AND on May 10, 1979, • and was forwarded to the Federal Environmental Protection Agency on July 25, 1979, in compliance with Section 110 (a) (1) of the Clean Air Act; and WHEREAS, the Clean Air Act of 1977 allows for an extension in the dead- lines for ..ttaining national air quality standards from 1982 to 1987 if all "reasonably available control measures" (RACMS) are implemented before December 31, 1982, and in the event these measures are not implemented by this date, empowers EPA to impose economic sanctions which could potentially cost the region billions of dollars in federal transportation and sewer construction grants; and WHEREAS, in order to avoid such federal economic sanctions pursuant to the 1977 Clean Air Act, the following six of the total seventy -five AQMP tactics, defined herein in "Exhibit 1 ", have been specifically identified as "reasonably available control measures" which require some degree of scheduled implementation by cities and counties in the South Coast Air Basin: - Employee ridesharing program - Traffic signal s vnchronizatlon - Increased bicycle and pedestrian facilities - Energy conservation street lighting - Modified work schedules - Carpool preferential parking • WHEREAS, the AQMP provides that if any of these six measures is found to be inappropriate or unacceptable in a jurisdiction then a commitment to implement an approved equivalent control measure may be substituted for imple- mentation of any reasonably available control measure; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that it is the intent of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; SECTION 1: To implement the pre -1982 reasonably available control measures, as described in "Exhibit 1 ", or equivalent substitute measures as set forth in the South Coast AQMP as approved by SCAG, SCAQMD, and the Air Resources Board. SECTION 2: To seek adequate funding from federal, state and local sources to put into effect the schedule of implementation attached to this resolution by the City of Rancho Cucamonga as "Exhibit 2 ". SECTION J: To forward copies of this Resolution to the Southern California Association of Governments, 600 South Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 1000, Los Angeles, California 90005. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of , 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: James C. Frost, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk • EXHIBIT 1 . VCM2E.R COVPOL MEASURE MIME AND DESCRIPTIO1 H -4 Modified 'Work Schedules -- Initiate, support, and set participation targets for the voluntary use of modified work schedules, where feasible, including staggered hours, flexible schedules, and 4/40, in order to promote the more efficient use of existing transit, reduce the need for trip making, and facilitate ridesharing among employees. H -5 Carpool Preferential Parking -- Promote ridesharing through the provision of a targeted number preferred parking areas for all employees engaging in carpooling, in order to reduce the need for trip making and reduce vehicle travel miles travelled (WIT). H -23 Increased Bicycle /Pedestrian Facilities -- Promote the use of • bicycle and pedestrian modes of transportation for short trips in order to reduce the need for vehicular trips and to reduce VMT, by providing a targeted number adequate and safe bicycle facilities such as bike paths and parking areas. H -34 Employee Rideshare Program -- Initiate a shift to high occupancy vehicles by assisting emplyees to form car /vanpools wherever feasible. Facilitate pooling by distributing Commuter Computer information. Establish voluntary participation targets for employee ridesharing (for example, between 25; and 501 employee participation). H -35 Traffic Signal Synchronization -- Target the installation of interconnected traffic signals which are synchronized at the system level in order to facilitate improved air quality by imorovina traffic flow along selected highways. 60 i EXHIBIT 2 u Number CONTROL MEASURE NAME AND DESCRIPTION N -4 Energy Conservation - Street Lighting -- Direct the efforts of lighting agencies to replace all existing inefficient lights and fixtures with energy efficient fixtures and lights. •NOTE: Dates shown in-schedule are for demonstratiea- puspos ._only (1 n lJ c SAMPLE SCHEDULE Development Initial Full Measure Startup Implementation Implementation Employee Ridesharing 1 /81 9/81 Continuous Traffic Signal Synchronization 2/80 6/80 Continuous Bicycle Paths 10179 9/80 Continuous Street Light Conversion 12/79 12/1/79 6/80 Modified Work Schedule 10179 9/80 Continuous • Carpool Parking 10/79 9/80 Continuous Other Measures •NOTE: Dates shown in-schedule are for demonstratiea- puspos ._only (1 n lJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . MEMORANDUM DATE: March 12, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs,City Engineer SUBJECT: Contract for Plan Processing Services Attached for City Council review and approval is an agreement with C. G. Engineering to provide plan checking, plan processing and bond preparation services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These services are to be paid for on a time and materials basis at rates as outlined in the agreement. C. G. Engineering is currently providing the majority of the City's plan checking services (on a time and material basis). The costs for these services, under the City fee resolution, are passed directly to the developer. The proposed agreement will expand the scope of services currently being performed. It will include administrative functions and more direct contact with developers and Engineers in the preparation of bonds and agreements to the point of acceptance by the City Council. The Engineering Staff at the beginning of the fiscal year had hopes to be able to hire an Engineer to mediate the plan check process and Technicians • to perform many of the routine processing tasks. To date we have been unable to obtain suitable applicants willing to accept these positions. Due to the severe staffing constraints this contract has been made necessary. The system being developed under this contract with C. G. Engineering is very similar to their current arrangement with the City of Upland. In addition to the plan check process, Engineering is exploring a cooperative effort with Upland and C. G. Engineering to make the standards and processes within the two Cities as compatible as possible. This will improve predictability for local developers and their Engineers. In connection with this cooperative effort the Engineering Staff will be further negotiating a contract with C. G. Engineering to assist in the preparation of City Standards and directives on the plan check policies and processes. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreement with C. G. Engineering to provide Plan Check processing and administrative services and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign on their behalf. Respectfully Submitted, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING D Lu be, • LEN /etr �� CCl TACT FC.. EI Gl;'EEFh :G SUNICES PC %1AP AP:C PLAT: CHECKCIG TFIS AGPEELIENT is made and entered into this dzy of , 19:10, by anc between the CITY CF BAi ;CEO CUCAi.�Ci'GA., a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter sometimes rcterrec to as the "City ", and CG Er:GuI711 ING, 2627 South Waterman P,venccy San Bernardino 9240L, Civil Engineers, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "EnSincer ", VIT?;%SSETF:: C'EE ^.EAS the City desires tc obtain the services of Enoincer to assist the City En „Inccr in the perfcrn ance of tl:e duties imposed upon the City EnLineer in revievang, chccl:ing and approvin;; raps and plans sul:rratted to the City in conjuocticn with scbcivision and parcel r.ap proceedings; and 1','IiEI:EAS Engineer is willing and able tc rencer such services; IJCC', TF'EI:Ef C. ^.E, in consideration of tl:e covenants, agreements and cncertJ:inl,s herein set forth and the faithful performance of then. and each of then: by the respectivo parties, the parties z;,ree anc unuertal:e as fcllor.s: I. Tcr;— Tl.is contract is for tLie tem. of ode (1) year froo the date of e::ccution at U.is career. ent, anc is subject to terr..ication at tiie v. ill o, either 63 1 • • pzrty cy giving written notice of such termination at least ninety (96) Wandar • days prior to ti:e date of requested terrnination. 2. Citv's ^esxrsibilities. The City, acting through its City Engineer and his desi;;nated repres¢ .tatives, will do the following: (a) Furnish the Engineer v,ith copies of all standards, guldclines, criteria, regulations and other written, materials having specific application oath the City and used by the City to govern the chccl:in-. of plans and maps; (b) Issue to the Engineer various plans and maps for checi:ing, after havin,, given then a preliminary screening for adequacy; • (c) i,ssi;,n priorities for the orier in which plans and maps are tc be chec!<ed; 3, ,En- ircrg'„ ^esnorsililitie_. The En;,inecr shall co the followin .,: (b) Chcck each map and plan for conformance v.1th City standards and requirements and with principles of good engineering and surveying practice; (c) Return to the design cni;inecr r..ap nL! plan check prints n.arWc: to indicate deficiencies; and (e) Nihon a plan or n-ap is checked and found to comply with. City recuircments, the 6� shall indicate this by signir.Z a stater:.ent to this effect on either final check: prints of a map or the originals of the plans. (e) Check the estimate of cost for bonding purposes, and prepare bonds, prepare subdivision agreer.er.ts an submt complete approved pacl:age to tl -.o City- 0 (f) provide personnel for one -day a week plan check service within the City Enginceriny Ceparm ent, ircrrporating at that time a review of procedures and all first check prints witin the City. • 4, Ti- -- f r 2 rlrr^ arcc. Tire Engineer shall eon,plete his work witiIin the followinf, m-- ir:ur. tir -es: (a) For the initial choci:ing of ir,.provement plans or a map, fifteen calendar days iron, the date of receipt; (b) For subsequent chechii% of plans or a r..ap v:hich have previously been checked, ter: calcnwr days iron, the date er recci.Pt. • � S • If a portion of a n.ap or of plans cannot Le checked because of inforr.arion nccccd from the engineer prep aricL, the map or plans, tl:e Engineer shall Lave t',o o;iticn of either marking the deficient; and returning the map or plans to eLtain the rissinG information. In either case, checking shall he con;pletec vriC:in the tine lin.its specifics in (a) and (b) aL•ove. 1. '.'enthlv States and Sillir,. The Enzincer s!:all keep a record of dates v.hen v,ork is receives and returned, of ti,-..c spent, of the staus of each rap or set of plans, and of other pertinent infcrr:ation. This information shall Le sent tc the City at the end of each month ales., v:it!' a hill for services performed during the rranth. • 6. -C2r. per.sction. The City v %ill compensate the Engineer monthly at tLe rates shown or: Exhibit h zttacl.ed. 7. Connie' of Int r <t (L) Euric�; the life of tl:is contract, the Engineer shall not perform services for any private client for land division or luw develol>o.ent %Wl in the City of Rarcl;c Cucar,.onga. G ITia':51' Y;i En EGI' tl,c parties hereto Lave caused this contract to be col; e>:ecuted on the day any year first above written. • CITY CF T.M CL;C CCCAB.,Ci:A, a munidpal corporation Mayor City Clerk CG Fa GV,EE. ^.ING Tit l(/ J r LJ 0 • • PREVAILING YO IRLY RATES June 1979 - June 1980 OFFICE Principal Engineer (Professional) $44.00/Hr. Project Manager (Professional) 42.00 /Hr. Associate Engineer 39.00/Hr. Principal Planner 35.00 /Hr. Designer - Draftsman 30.00 /Hr. Draftsman 25.00 /Hr. Engineer Aide 20.00 /Hr. Clerical 11.00 /Hr. FIELD Resident Engineer (Professional) 42.00/Hr. Inspector (Licensed) 39.00 /Hr. Inspector (Unlicensed) 30.00 /Hr. Field Survey Supervisor (Licensed) 39.00 /Hr. 2 Man Survey Party 76.00 /Hr. 3 man Survey Party 98.00 /Hr. Electronic Measuring Device 60.00 /Day MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES AND EXPENSES Mileage 0.175 /Ali. Prints, Copying, Reproduction and Miscellaneous Materials Cost t 10% Outside Consultant Services Cost • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 19, 1980 TO: City Council 8 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEM PROJECTS AGREEMENT FOR SIGNALS AND LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BASE LINE /HELLMAN AND ARCHIBALD /CHURCH The attached supplement to the City's Federal Aid Urban Agreement with the State for the signal installations is for the purpose of providing additional funds to the City. Under the supplement, the City's share of the project, originally $15,788, will be paid by the new State funding. As a result, the signals will require only nominal capital expenditure by the City if unfore- seen expenses should be more than the 5% contingency allowance. It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution • authorizing the execution of Supplement 1 - Revision 1 to Agreement #08 -5402. Respectfully 5ubmitted, '. Lloyd B. Hobbs City Engineer LBH:deb • 67 0 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08 -5420 AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. I - REVISION 1 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to take advantage of additional state funding for the construction of signals at the inter- sections of Archibald Avenue and Church Street and Base Line and Hellman Avenue; and WHEREAS, said funding requires the execution of Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08 -5420 and Program Supplement No. 1 - Revision 1 by an authorized aaent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the execution of Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08 -5420 and Program Supplement No. I Revision 1 and authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agree- ment on its behalf and transmit to the State for processing. • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1980. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk James C. Frost, Mayor STATE 'Of CALIFORNIA — BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., GereI.- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT B, P. o. BOX 211 &AN BERNARDINO, CALUORNIA 92/61 February 11, 1980 0S- SBd- 0 -RCuc MG- 3041(65) Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs: Attached for your execution are two copies of Supplement No. 1 -Rev 1 under Local Agency -State Agreement No. 08 -5402 for FAU Project MG- 3041(65), signals and lighting at the intersection of Baseline/ Hellman and Archibald /Church. Note that this revised agreement reflects the use of State 169.1 matching funds. • Please type in the date of execution on each of the Agreements. After execution, return all original agreements along with an authorizing resolution to this office. After execution by the District Director an original of each agreement will be returned to you. Should you desire additional information about these documents, please call Mr. Fred Mielen at (714) 383 -4579. Very truly yours, J. E. PEDDY District Director B J K. Feenstr 1 Assistance Coordinator t 0 I`ili l Y L`CYFLC' ?i,:i!i Y DEPT. AU :18A17j11IL11j2,31,115 6I Local Agency City of Rancho Cucamonga Date Supp � e, wt r :_31 1R�ev 1 gD To Local Agency -State Agreement No. 08 -5420 • PROGRAf) OF IDcAL AGENCY FEDFfzAL AID URBAN SYSTEM PRDiEcrs IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Local Agency Pursuant to the Federal Aid for Urban Systems Acts, the attached "Program" of Federal Aid Urban System Projects marked "Exhibit B" is hereby incorporated in that Master Agreement for the Federal -Aid Program which was entered into between the above named LOCAL AGENCY and the STATE on December 5, 1979, and is subject to all of the terms and con Lions thereof. The subject program is adopted in accordance with Paragraph of Article II of the aforementioned agreement under authority of City /Sato Resolution No. approved by the City Counci Hoamdxafxdnporxadaeva on (See copy attached). Approved for State CITY OF RANCHO CU Attest: District Director of Transportation Date District oa. Department of .,Transportation i Form DH -OLA -411 (2/78) 1 `u i O E `o a d c � , a ia' ~ u nj O n. ��u J T r r- T Lkv Date: ,!anuary 31, 1980 Pi'.OGRP,il Cr FEDERAL AID LIRBAN Sysmi PmJECTS PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO.: 1 -Rev 1 • .. EXHIBIT B Local Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga ro�j ect ,lo. Location & Description Total Cost Est. Federal Funds flatching Funds- MG-3041(65) In San Bernardino County CONSTFJCTION 169.1 funds in Rancho Cucamonga at Baseline Avenue and $113,500 $97,712 $15,788 Hellman Avenue and at A•chibald Avenue and Church Street *Local Agency Funds unless otherwise specified Special Ccvenants or Remarks: 1. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the operation of the improvements, referred to in Article VI MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be performed by the City of Rancho Cucamon a at regular intervals or as required or efficient operation or the completed improvements. DII -OLA -411 (5/77) EXHIBIT B Page 2 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will advertise, award and administer this • project. 3. Unless determined otherwise by San Bernardino County's Cooperative Process Committee, the actual funds for the project will be set up on the basis of contract prices after the bids for the work have been opened. In awarding or agreeing to award the contract, the City agrees the payment of Federal Funds will be limited to the Detail Estimate amount approved by the FHWA in the Federal -Aid Project Agreement (PR -2), or its modification (PR -2A), and accepts any increases in City Funds. 4. The use of Federal Funds for this project is subject to the project being selected as part of the multi -year FAU Program for San Bernardino County's portion of the LA /LONG Beach Urbanized Area. 5. Should higher priority projects cause increase or decrease to the Federal funds available, this project will be financed with the maximum Federal funds available to the County. 6. Should additional Federal Funds become available to the City, this amount will, at the City's request, be increased to the amount available but not to exceed the maximum legal Federal prorata share with a corresponding decrease in the matching funds. 7. In accordance with Section 86 -2.14 of State Standard Specifications for testing controllers, the Local Agency agrees to pay their share of the cost of testing. • 8. The availability of Federal Funds will be subject to meeting deadlines and /or other conditions as may be imposed by the Director upon the recom- mendation of the FAU Advisory Committee. 9. The local agency share of matching funds will be 100% of the amount remaining after Federal participation and 169.1 funds. 10. The portion of the local agency funds required to match Federal Highway Funds in the project will be provided by the State as authorized by Item 169.1 of the Budget Act of 1979 and allocated by the California Transportation Commission. 11. The 169.1 funds in the project will be as shown on Exhibit 8. 12. In the event the Item 169.1 funds required arp less than the amnunt shown in Exhibit B or the detail estimate, the excess may revert to: (1) the county allocation provided the funds are released prior to June 30, 1980; (2) county projects provided the funds are released prior to June 30, 19G2 and providing project(s) containing Item 169.1 funds can utilize the released funds. 13. In accordance with Section 16304 of the Government Code, Item 169.1 funds may be available for expenditure until June 30, 1982 unless otherwise provided by future budget act language. 1 • M EXHIBIT B • Page 3 14. The local agency may be required to report to the California Transportation Commission concerning use of Item 169.1 funds and that the funds freed as a result of the receipt of Item 169.1 funds are eligible for street, road ' and highway purposes. • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: March 11, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: FAU Funds Exchange Attached for Council concurrence is a Letter of Understanding with the City of Montclair to exchange Gas Tex funds for their allocation of Federal Aid Urban funds (FAU). The reasons for the exchange are outlined in the agreement. Due to the availability of State matching funds and the City's early completion of the Base Line Reconstruction,we will realize a 14% fund increase on the funds expended. In total this will amount to approximately $17,724.00. RECOSMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council authorize the City Manager to sign the Letter of Understanding and authorize payment of funds as outlined in the agreement. Respectfully Submitted, • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION abeC��i C y Engineer LBH /ctr Attachment: City of �ANCHO CUCAM0NGA March 11, 1980 Mr. G. Michael Milhiser City Manager City of Montclair P.O. Box 2308 Montclair, California 91763 SUBJECT: LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING AGREEMENT FOR EXCHANGE OF FEDERAL AID URBAN FUNDS Dear Mr. Milhiser: This letter is to formalize an agreement to exchange the City of Montclair Federal Aid Urban population allocation funds for City of Rancho Cucamonga Gas Tax funds, STATEMENT OF FACTS • The City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to construct its Base Line Reconstruction project with Federal Aid Urban (FAU) funds. Total cost of the Base Line projects is estimated at $250,000 of which $133,200 in Rancho Cucamonga FAU population funds are available. Projects approved prior to July 1, 1980 are eligible for State participation in City matching funds on Federal projects. Because the Base Line project has been approved by CALTRANS for advertisement and is eligible for State matching funds, it is to the benefit of Rancho Cucamonga to obtain maximum Federal participation in the project. This can be accomplished through addition of the Montclair FAU allocation. The City of Montclair has $126,584 in FAD population funds allocated under the 1978 Highway Act, an amount approximately equal to that required by the Base Line rpoject. Tn that the Citv of Montclair has not yet begun processing of an FAU project, it is to its benefit to obtain funds through conventional funding sources to remove lengthy federal procedures for financing. • —//—/7 POST OFFICE BOX 793, RANCHO CUCA)IO9GA, CA .IFRNIA 91730 (714) 9894851 Letter of Understanding Page 2 AGREEMENT • In light of the facts stated above, the Cities of Montclair and Rancho Cucamonga agree to the following: 1. The City of Montclair hereby relinquishes its Federal Aid Urban population allocation of $126,584 to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for its use. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby agrees to make payment of $126,584 to the City of Montclair in two equal installments. The first installment due August 15, 1980, the second on September 15, 1980. AGREED Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager, Rancho Cucamonga G. Michael Milhiser • City Manager, Montclair DATE: • • A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga Regular Meeting March 19, 1980 AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE: All items submitted for the City Council agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Pledge to Flag. B. Roll Call: Schlosser_, Mikels_, Palombo_, Bridge_, Frost_ • C. Approval of Minutes: None were submitted. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Advisory Commission, March 20, 6:30 p.m. - Library Conference Room. b. Mayors' 8 Presidents Policy Committee, Thursday, April 10, 7:00 p.m. Ontario City Council Chambers, 303 East "B" Street. c. Citizens' Advisory Committee final study session of General Plan alternatives - March 22, 9:00 a.m., Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility. d. Development representatives of regional shopping centers to present concepts to Planning Commission and review of General Plan alternatives on March 24, 7:00 p.m. - Lion's Park Community Center. 3. REPORTS. A. Advisory Commission B. Historical Commission C. Storm Drain Assessment District report. i • D. A request has been received by a group of citizens to address the Council regarding storm damage. • City Council Agenda -2- March 19, 1980 4. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants: Register No. 80 -3 -19 for $249,769.03. 1 b. Set public hearing date of April 2, 1980 for consideration of designation of the Oso Bear as a Historic Landmark and the original Cucamonga Post Office site as a Point of Historic Interest. c. Set public hearing date of April 2, 1980 for Zone Change No. 80 -01 Issaacs - A change of zone from R -3 to C -2 for property located on the northwest corner of Base Line and East Avenue. d. Set public hearing date for May 7, 1980 - Appeal of Zone Change No. 80 -02 - Watt Industries - A change of zone from R -3 to C -2 for property located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon and Highland. e. Set public hearing date for May 21, 1980 - Appeal of Site Approval No. 80 -01 - Hone and Associates - Proposed shopping center to be located on the southwest corner of Lemon and Haven. f. Authorization for Deputy City Clerk to attend the 8th Annual 3 Conference, Cities Clerks' Association of California on . April 17 -19. Cost: Approximately $200. g. Acceptance of Bond and Agreement /Laird Construction. 4 Laird Construction has been hired to perform certain emergency street restoration at various locations designated as an eminent hazard. Security is sufficient in nature to insure orderly payment of labor and materials. Labor and Material (surety) E 50,000 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -25 which directs the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and security on behalf of the City. RESOLUTION NO. 80 25 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LABOR AND MATERIAL AGREEMENT - LAIRD CONSTRUCTION. h. Request authorization to seek bids on the city's Base Line re- 6 construction project from Agate to Hellman Avenue and from Archibald Avenue `- Teak Way. Tha prOja is b2 fund04 through a combination of FAU funds, State matching funds, and City gas tax. Estimated proportions are listed below: City Council Agenda -3- March 19, 1980 • City FAU funds $133,200 State matching funds 35,000 City funds 81,800 $250,000 Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve the advertise- ment of the Base Line reconstruction project. i. Tracts 9267, 9268, and 9269: Request for bond extensions, 7 Developer: Mark III Homes, Inc. These tracts were approved by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors on April 25, 1977, along with the improvement agreement and improvement securities. The tract maps were sub- sequently approved. The sewer and water facilities were approved and the bonds were released on July 18, 1979. The road and home constructions are both 75% complete. Request is for a two year extension and their surety company is in agreement to the time extension. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council grant a twelve month extension from the date of default to complete the street improvements. Therefore, the developer, by this extension has until October 25, 1980 to complete the street improvements. • Further, it is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to notify the developer of the time extension on the road improvement agreement. Tract 9351: Request for bond extension. Developer: Mark 111 14 Homes. Approval of the final tract map and appropriate improvement agree- ment and improvement securities was received on February 1, 1978. The developer has subsequently graded the property and has executed a street permit to construct the necessary street improvements. The water system has been installed, and the developer is currently working with the Cucamonga County Water District on the installation of the sewer system. The Cucamonga County Water District has agreed to the extension request, and the surety for the developer agrees with the 24 -month extension. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve a twelve month extension subject to approval to the condition that the developer replace all bonds and agreement that reflect current City forms and estimate cost of construction. Further, that the developer make arrangements with the CCWD to replace bonds presently being held by the City. k. Tract 9423: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement. Located on the 19 southwest corner of Base Line Road and Beryl Avenue and consists • of 22 lots, Developer: Coral Homes. Performance Bond (road) $137,500 Labor 6 Material (road) $137,500 City Council Agenda -4- March 19, 1980 • Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -26 directing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City Council, and the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf of the City. The City Engineer shall forward the map for recording. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -26 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9423. 1. Tract 9444: Located on the northeast corner of-Banyan 22 Street and Amethyst Street and consists of 20 lots. Release bonds to: Rancho De Cucamonga (Mark III Homes) Performance Letter of Credit (road) $ 76,000 Labor 8 Material Letter of Credit (road) $ 76,000 Accept bonds from: Fox Hollow Development (Nubank Inter- national). Performance Bond (road) $ 76,000 • Labor 8 Material Bond (road) $ 76,000 The subject tract has been sold to the Fox Hollow Company. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -27 directing the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf of the City. Also, to hereby release the securities presently on file with the City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -27 24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVE- MENT SFr..IIRTTY. m. Refer claim by Mr. and Mrs. T. L. Blasingame for $3,600 25 to the City Attorney for handling. n. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage license permit to John K. 27 Isaacs, Isaacs' Chevron Service Station, 8687 Base Line Road. License for Off sale beer and wine. o. Award of Contract for Base Line Widening. 29 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve award • Of the Base Line Widening project to Crowell and Larson and authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute contract documents. Also, the Council approved authorization to fund the contract amount of $39,789.82 plus a 10% contingency and $2,000.00 for construction staking. 0 City Council Agenda -5- March 19, 1980 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. Resolution o_f Necessity - Teasdale Property. Staff report 35 by Robert DougFierty. The resolution adopted by Council on November 15, 1978 was defective in that reference to the particular state law authorizing condemnation was omitted. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a new resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -28 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, TO EXERCISE RIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE PURPOSES. B. An Appeal by Pluess - Staufer. Staff report by Jack Lam. 41 The Pluess- Staufer project is a proposed 80 acre industrial calcium carbonate processing plant to be located between 8th Street and 6th Street, west of Rochester. The processing facility will include rack rail unloading and storage facility, • rock crushing and grinding facilities, storage silos, bagging and warehousing facilities, rail car and truck loading facili- ties, and maintenance buildings, and an office building. The Planning Commission gave final approval of the Pluess- Staufer facility on January 9, 1980. However, the Commission did approve the site layout on November 19, 1979. The Planning Commission waited for final approval in order to give Pluess- Staufer an opportunity to revise their landscaping plans to be more con- sistent with the objectives of the City in promoting well designed projects that reflect a high quality. The challenge for Pluess - Staufer was to design the site and create design elements compatible with the area. The largest structure on the facility is to be 105 feet high and the raw materials stock pile is to be 40 feet making this facility a very visually prominent feature. The Pluess- Staufer plant is proposed in the heart of an area in which planned industrial parks are either in the design stages or have already been approved. Therefore, visual relief and other environmental concerns such as noise and dust attenuation are important to the compatibility of the Pluess- Staufer use with the future of planned industrial activities in the area. It was the concern of the Planning Commission, staff, City of Ontario. and adjacent Property owners that if the use goes in, it must be made to be compatible through proper buffering. The Planning Commission approved the • facility with conditions that required appropriate landscape buffering. THESE CONDITIONS FOR BUFFERING ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE APPEAL. City Council Agenda -6- March 19, 1980 • Recommendation: It is the recommendation of staff and the Planning Commission that the Appeal be denied, and the Planning conditions for landscape buffering be upheld. C. Amendment to Historic Preservation Ordinance No. 70. Report by Bill Holley. The amendment imposes a ban on material changes to proposed historical landmarks. ORDINANCE NO. 70 -C AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 70 BY ADDING SUB- SECTION (h) THERETO TO PROHIBIT MATERIAL CHANGES ON PROPOSED LANDMARKS UNTIL FINAL ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. Disaster Preparedness Plan for Rancho Cucamonga. Oral report y Bill Holley, Community ty ervices rector. - • B. Public Works Maintenance Program. Report by Lloyd Hubbs. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council approve in concept the maintenance program as outlined and authorize the recruitment of staff and acquisition of equipment as follows: Additional Staff One Maintenance Worker III Two Maintenance Workers II Two Maintenance Workers I Major Equipment One asphalt patch truck* E 45,000 Two dump trucks equipped with blade or loader 60,000 One street sweeper /catch basin cleaner 75,000 One front end loader with hoe and drag attach. 35,000 One full size pick -up truck 15,000 One utility vehicle 15,000 Total $2ds_U *Received prior Council authorization to solicit bids. C, • 1 Resolution to Implement Locally Controlled Air GudiiL.v rlenage- ment Plan Measures. Staff report by aim Recommendation: If the City Council concurs that the measures delineated in Resolution No. 80 -29 involve minimal staff effort and minimal cost to the City in implementation, adoption of the Resolution is recommended. 52 54 55 57 City Council Agenda -7- March 19, 1980 RESOLUTION NO. 80 -29 5B A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INDICATING ITS INTENT TO IMPLEMENT PRIOR TO DECEMBER 31, 1982 HEREIN DEFINED "REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES" FROM THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN. 0. Contract for Plan Processing Services. Staff report by 62 Lloyd Hubbs. Recommendation: It is recanmen_ed that the City Council approve the agreement with C.G. Engineering to provide Plan Check processing and administrative services and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign on their behalf. E. local A enc Federal Aid Urban 5 stem Pro'ects A reement 69 for i na s and Li tin at t e ntersect ono Base Line Road/Hellman Avenue and Archibald AVenUejuhurch Street. Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council • approve Resolution No. 80 -30 authorizing the execution of Supplement 1- Revision 1 to Agreement 808 -5402. RESOLUTION 40. 80 -30 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08 -5420 AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 - REVISION 1. F. FAU Funds Exchange. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. 71 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Council authorize the City Manager to sign the Letter of Under- standing and authorize payment of funds as outlined in the agreement. G. Request to Utilize Contingency Funds to Provide Consultant Services for Development of a turn key Personnel System. rl) el" report Sy Lauren Wasserman. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. a. NEW GUGinESS. . A. Council B. Audience 9. ADJOURNMENT, Ll ir$ o March i9, 1980 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, March 19, 1980. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor James C. Frost who led in the pledge to the flag. Present: Councilmen Phillip Schlosser, Jon Mikels, Arthur Bridge, and Mayor James C. Frost. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs. Absent: Councilman Michael Palombo. Approval of Minutes: there were no minutes submitted for approval. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Chamber of Conmerce would be hosting a program to present all the Council cand'datec on Thursday, March 20, Lion's Park Community Center, at 7:00 p.m. b. Thursday, March 27, special meeting to discuss the General Plan. Tonight's mer ?ng would be adjourning to this special meeting, c. Special Olympics to be held April 12 starting at 9:00 a.m at Montclair High School. d. Mikels stated that one of the speakers at the recent SCAG meetings statq. since air travel is down then the development of the regional airport was not as important as it was first thought necessary. Mikels pointed out there seemed to be a wide difference of opinion. e. Mayor presented a report from the National League of Cities' meeting which "Ff held in Washington O.C. f. Wasserman requested that Consent Calendar item "n" be removed. g. Wasserman announced that just before the meeting, Mrs. Taylor had left the city $40.00 in cash to help the city with the financing for flood control. She said that perhaps this could be just the beginning. h. March of Dimes Superwalk to be held March 23 starting at 9:30 a.m. at Chaffey College. i. Mayor announced that some local school volunteers had earned over 100 hours of service and that letters of thanks had been sent to them over his signature as Mayor. 3. REPORTS. a. Advisory Commission. None. b. Historical Commission. None. C. Storm Drain Assessemnt District Report by Lloyd Hubbs. Mr. Hubbs used slides e: pact of 611 preae,lrarinn which showed recent storm damage in the city. 7:30 p.m. Councilman Palombo arrived. I City Council Minutes March 19, 1980 Page 2 d. Report from Citizens. The City had received a petition from residents in the area of Sapphire and Banyan regarding the flood problems. In particular, the uncovered storm drain which had taken the life of a young child during the last storm. Those addressing Council were: Mrs. Sharon Whiteside David Watson Action: Council authorized staff to repair the immediate problem with the drain by placing some type of grate over it and to report back at the next meeting as to the exact cost. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants: Register No. 80 -2 -19 for $249,768.03. b. Set public hearing date of April 2, 1980 for consideration of designation of the Oso Bear as a Historic Landmark and the original Cucamonga Post Office site as a Point of Historic Interest. c. Set public hearing date of April 2, 1980 for Zone Change No. 80 -01 - Isaacs. A change of zone from R -3 to C -2 for property located on the northwest corner of Base Line and East Avenue. d. Set public hearing date for May 79 1980 - Appeal of Zone Change No. 80-02 - Watt Industries. A change of zone from R -3 to C -2 for property located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon and Highland. e. Set public hearing data for May 21, 1980 - Appeal of Site Approval No. 80 -01 - Hone and Associates. Proposed shopping center to be located on th- southwest comer of Lemon and Haven. f. Authorization for Deputy City Clerk to attend the 8th Annual Conference, City Clerks' Association of California on April 17 -19. Cost: approximately $200. g. Acceptance of Bond and Agreement /Laird Construction. Laird Construction has been hired to perform certain emergency street restora- tion at various locations designated as an eminent hazard. Security is sufficient in nature to insure orderly payment of labor and materials. Labor and Material (surety) $ 50,000. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -25 which directs the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and security on behalf of the City. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LABOR AND MATERIAL AGREEMENT - LAIRD CONSTRUCTION. h. Request authorization to seek bids on the city's Base Line reconstruction project from Agate to Hellman Avenue and from Archibald Avenue to Teak Way. The project is to be funded through a combination of FAU funds, State matching funds, and City gas tax. Estimated proportions are listed below: City FAU funds $133,200 State matching funds 35,000 City funds 81,800 $250,000 Recommendation: It is recommended that Council approve the advertisement of the Base Line reconstruction project. I. Tracts,9267, 9268, 9269: Request for bond extensions. Developer: Mark III Homes, Inc. City Council Minutes March 19, 1980 Page 3 Approval of the final tract map and appropriate improvement agreement and improvement securities was received on February 1, 1978. The developer has subsequently graded the property and has executed a street permit to construct the necessary street improvements. The water system has been installed, and the developer is currently working with the Cucamonga County Water District on the installation of the sewer system. The Cucamonga County Water District has agreed to the extension request, and the surety for the developer agrees with the 24 -month extension. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve a twelve month extension subject to approval to the condition that the developer re- place all bonds and agreement that reflect current City forms and estimate cost of construction. Further, that the developer make arrangements with the CCWD to replace bonds presently being held by the City. k. Tract 9423: Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement. Located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Beryl Avenue and consists of 22 lots. Developer: Coral Homes. Performance bond (road) $137,500 Labor 6 Material (road) $137,500 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -26 directing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City Council, and the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf of the City. The City Engineer shall forward the map for recording. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9423. 1. Tract 9444: Located on the northeast comer of Banyan Street and Amethye! Street and consists of 20 lots. Release bonds to: Rancho De Cucamonga (Mark III Homes) Performance Letter of Credit (road) $76,000 Labor 6 Material letter of Credit (road) $76,000 Accept bonds from: Fox Hollow Development (Nubonk International) Performance bond (road) $76,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $76,000 (The subject tract has been sold to the Fox Hollow Company.) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 80 -27 directing the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf of the City. Also, to release the securities presently on file with the City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. M. Refer claim by Mr. and Mrs. T. L. Blasingame for $3,600 to the City Attorney for handling, n-- Appeovsi-- o�- nleohoi4e- Bevera e ' ri c e. Item had been deleted from the Consent Calendar. o, Award of Contract for Base Line Widening. Recosmendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the awarding City Council Minutes March 19, 1980 Page 4 of the Base Line Widening project to Crowell and Larson and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute contract documents. Also, the Council approve authorization to fond the contract amount of $19,789.82 plus a 10% contingency and $2,000.00 for construction staking. Lauren Wasserman pointed out that item "o ", Award of Contract for Base Line widening project would be financed through gas tax funds. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried 5 -0. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 5A. Resolution of Necessity - Teesdale Property. Staff report by Robert Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney. A Resolution of Necessity had been adopted by Council on November 15, 1978. However, the Resolution was defective in that reference to the particular State law authorizing the condemnation was omitted. Therefore, it 1s necessary to adopt a new Resolution of Necessity. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve the adoption of Resolution No. 80 -28 and waive the entire reading. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. Mr. Teasdale addressed the Council. After a lengthy discussion between Council and Mr. Teesdale, Councilman Palombo called for the question. Motion on whether to call for the question was passed 4 -1 -0. Mayor asked if there was anyone else who wished to speak. There was no response. Motion made previously was passed by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO EXERCISE RIGHT OF EMINENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR DRAIN- AGE AND FLOWAGE PURPOSES. 5B. An Appeal by Pluess - Staufer. Staff report by Jack Lam. The Pluess- Staufer project is a proposed 80 -acre industrial calcium carbonate processing plant to be located between 8th Street and 6th Street, west of Rochester. The processing facility will include rock rail unloading and storage facility, rock crushing and grinding facilities, storage silos, bagging and warehousing facilities, rail car and truck loading facilities, and maintenance buildings, and an office building. The Planning Commission gave final approval of the Pluess - Staufer facility on January 9, 1980. However, the Commission did approve the site layout on November 19, 1979. The Planning Commission waited for final approval in order to give Pluess - Staufer an opportunity to revise their landscaping plans to be more consistent with the objectives of the City in promoting well designed projects that reflect a high quality. The challenge for Pluess - Staufer was to design the site and create design elements compatible with the area. 1 City Council Minutes March 19, 1980 Page 5 The largest structure on the facility is to be 105 feet high and the raw materials stock pile is to be 40 fee making this facility a very visually prominent feature. The Pluess - Staufer plant is proposed in the heart of an area in which planned industrial parka are either in the design stages or have already been approved. 'Therefore, visual relief and other environmental concerns such as noise and dust attenuation are important to the compatibility of the Pluess- Staufer use with the future of planned industrial activities in the area. It was the concern of the Planning Commission, staff, City of Ontario, and adjacent property owners that if the use goes in, it must be made to be compatible through proper buffering. The Planning Commssion approved the facility with conditions that required appropriate landscape buffering. These conditions for buffering are the subject of the appeal. Mayor asked if anyone was present representing Pluess- Staufer. There was no response. Mikels said that in the absence of the applicant, the Council should go ahead with the process. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to deny the appeal. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There was no response. The public hearing was closed. Motion was approved to deny the appeal by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo., Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT; None, 5C. Amendment to Historic Preservation Ordinance No. 70. Report by Bill Holley The proposed amendment would impose a ban on material changes to proposed histori- cal landmarks while under consideration of future historical designations. Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to introduce Ordinance No. 70 -C, set April 2 for second reading, and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO. 70 -C AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 70 BY ADDING SUBSECTION (h) THERETO TO PROHIBIT MATERIAL CHANGES ON PROPOSED LANDMARKS UNTIL FINAL ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 6A. Disaster Preparedness Plan for Rancho Cucamonga. Staff report was presented by Bill Holley, Director of Community Services. Mr. Holley presented an oral information report. to Council on how things were proceeding toward a disaster preparedness program. 6B. Public Works Maintenance Program. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Mr. Hubbs turned the meeting over to Monte Preacher, Assistant Civil Engineer, and David Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor. Because the County Road Maintenance ..u„ rd..L ,upiLes u,u july 10 1990, staff vaa requesting e...ucriaatica to 5...rt recruiting personnel and seeking bids for equipment. Levels of service would not change since it was felt that any funds available should go for capital improvements. City Council Minutes March 19, 1980 Page 6 Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to authorize staff to start recruiting personnel and acquisition of equipment as follows: One Maintenance Worker III Two Maintenance Workers II Two Maintenance Workers I One asphalt patch truck* $ 45,000 Two dump trucks equipped with blade or loader $ 60,000 One street sweeper /catch basin cleaner $ 75,000 One front end loader with hoe and drag attach. $ 35,000 One full size pick -up truck $ 15,000 One utility vehicle $ 15.000 Total $245,000 * Received prior Council authorization to solicit bids. Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 6C. Resolution to Implement Locally Controlled Air Quality Managerment Plan Measures. Staff report by Barry Hogan, Associate Planner. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution 80-29 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -29 A RESOLUTION OF TILE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, INDICATING ITS INTENT TO IMPLEMENT PRIOR TO DECEMBER 31, 1982 HEREIN DEFINED "REASONABLY AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES" FROM THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN. 6D. Contract for Plan Processing Services. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Bridge for approval of agreement and authorization for City Clerk and Mayor to sign agreement with C.C. Engineering to provide plan check processing. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mikels (had tempor- arily left the room). Mayor called a recess at 9:50 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:00 p.m, with all Councilmen and staff present. Avenue /Uhurch street. Start report by Lloyd Hoots. Approval of the supplement to the city's Federal Aid Urban Agreement will pro- vide additional funds to the city. Under the supplement, the city's share of the project, originally $15,788, will be paid by the new State funding. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 80 -30 and waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 80 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08 -5420 AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. I - REVISION 1. City Council Minutes March 19, 1980 Page 7 report Mr. Wasserman pointed out in an oral report that the City did not have a personnel policy and procedure. He also pointed out that there were some positions which needed to be evaluated. Staff was requesting authorization to conduct a personnel system for the City and a position classification program. It was recommended that Doug Ayres, who was currently working as a consultant for the City in implementing Proposition 4, be appointed to do this study for the City. Reasons for chosing Mr. Ayres is he has already established personnel relationships with employees. He has had experience as a City Manager and City Finance Director. Cost of the program would be approximately $14,100. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo to authorize the transfer of $14,100 in funds from the contingency account to the appropriate account for the hiring of Mr. Doug Ayres as a consultant in establishing a personnel system and a position classification program for the city. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none. 8. NEW BUSINESS. BA. Bridge said he was not pleased with the conclusions of the 4 -way stop sign at Carnelian and Banyan. He said he would still like to see further consideration of a 4-way stop at that location. Hobbs said the Traffic Committee voted to monitor this for another year. Bridge said he would like to oppose this. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo to override the Traffic Committee's recommendation and have a 4-way stop installed at the intersection of Carnelian and Banyan. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 8B. Mayor said he would like to see a Resolution drafted for volunteers with over 100 hours of service be brought back to the next meeting for consideration. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to direct staff to draft a Resolution commending volunteers with over 100 hours of service. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 9. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn the meeting to Thursday, March 27 at 7:00 p.m. at the Lion's Park Community Center. Motion carried 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk