No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/03/18 - Agenda PacketGoo G~~cn,aplc' < ~ > r C j ~ ~ n z F V Z U > 1977 C1TY OF R~A~l~1t~~1~07~'G~i~1CA1NOI~1Cu1 March 18, 1981 A11 items submitted for the City Council agenda must be in writing. The dead- line for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Flag Salute. B. Roll Call: Frost, Mikels ~ , Palombo ~ , Bridge, and Schlosser ? . 5~~~ C. Approval of Minutes: March 4, 1981. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Monday, March 16, 7:00 p. m. -General Plan public hearing; Lion's Park Conmunity.Center, 9161 Base Line Road. b. Wednesday, March 25, 7:00 p.m. - Planning Commission meeting, Lion's Park Conmunity Center, 9161 Base Line Road. c. Thursday, March 26, 6:30 p.m. -Advisory Commission meeting, Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. d. Thursday, March 26, 8:00 p,m. - Victoria Plan hearing, Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Lfne Road. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- con- troversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without dSs- cussion. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81-3-18 for $315,216.97. 1 __ b. Request authorization to complete sale of City land to 6 ,_ San Bernardino County Flood Control District for con- struction of Demens Channel. City Council Agenda -2- March 18, 1981 c. Acceptance of North Town Street and Drainage Improvements. 18 Recommend that Council accept as complete the North Town Street and Drainage Improvements and authorize the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion and release Performance Bonds. RESOLUTION N0. 81-31 19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE NORTH TOWN STREET ANO DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ANO AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. d. Quitclaim Deeds for Abandonment of Easements for Chestnut 21 Street. Recommend that Council approve the abandonment of easements granted to the City by Victor Cherbak for Chestnut Street. RESOLUTION N0. 81-32 __.__ ?2 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AND EXECUTING A QUITCLAIM DFED. e. Request to set for public hearing on April 1, 1981 27 an appeal of Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 9441. 29 f and ppeal oftPlanninglConmission Conditional 1981 Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 11609. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. The following items are public hearings in which concerned citizens may voice their opinion. Please wait to be recognized Dy the Mayor and address the Ci Cy Council From the public microphone Dy giving your name and address. If possible, comments should be limited to S minutes. Please register on the "Sign-up Sheet" before taki ny your seat. A. MOBILE HOf1E RENT REVIEW. Mobile home park tenants have 31 requested to address City Council regarding increases in rents. Staff report by Jim Robinson. B. CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. Staff report by Jack Lam, 47 • City Council Agenda -3- March 18, 1981 ORDINANCE N0. 139 (second reading) 48 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A GENERAL PENALTY FOR WILL- FUL FAILURE TO APPEAR AS INDICATED ON A CITATION ISSUED FOR VIOLATIONS OF ORDIN- ANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C. UEST TO CO OER PROPOS MODIFICATIO TO THE 49 ~. OMN NS R TE ~ET THE I E TS. Staff r ort by Ji"'~"~nson. D. ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-12 - BARMAKIAN. A request for a 58 change o zone rom - - m ted agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size) to R-1-20 (single family residential, 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) for 24.36 acres of land located on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN 202-181-07. Staff report by Jack Lam. • ORDINANCE N0. 140 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. 202-181-07 FROM A-1-5 TO R-1-20 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALMOND ROAD, EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET. 94 E. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION. Designation of street 96 tree plantings on High and venue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue as a historic landmark. Staff report by Bill Holley. ORDINANCE N0. 141 (first reading) 99 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE PRLM AND EUCALYPTUS STREET PLANTINGS ON HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN ETI- WANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE AS A SIGNI- FICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY, AND THEREFORE, DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. City Council Agenda -4- March 18, 1981 • 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. A REQUEST BY THE INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION. 100 Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation has been retained by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors under contract to conduct an assessment of needs in the field of cultural arts and, from this, develop a county wide comprehensive arts plan. This is being done under a grant from the California Arts Council as part of its State/Local Partnership Program. B. REQQUEST TO RECONSIDER REVERSION TO ACREAGE FOR TRACTS 119 9~9T ND 00 N fH~IUE~F~NYAF~I E N L N AND BERYL. Staff report y Jac Lam. Last year the Cfty Council took action to revert to acreage Tracts 9399 and 9400 because the owners of the tract allowed the improvement agreement and bonds to lapse on the County approved tracts. However, a quirk in the Subdivision Map Act requires that the signature of the property owner is necessary in order to record a reversion map. The owner in this case • does not wish to sign. C. UEST TOIS~NSIDER A RESO TiON ESTABL HING 123 EL TiV S. to ort y Lauren Wass Tian. RESOLUTION N0. 81-33 124. 'b.u.w~<< . UTION OF THE CI COUNCIL THE A R~ESO L ~ ~ CITY W RANCHO CUCAMON CALIFORN URGING~CANSIOERATION OF GION RATHE THAN COUNTY BOUNDARIES IN STABLISHING ELECTIVE BOUNDARIES. 0. REQUEST FORA PRE-BUDGET STUDY SESSION. Staff report 125 by Lauren Wasserman. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 7. ADJOURNMENT. Meeting to adjourn to Monday, March 16, at 7:00 p.m. fora general plan hearing. ~~ ~,4im - use...., ~ •L~„~,i-... - rv~~P.,E1~~. ., t ~rt a ~n ~P _.. .__ -_ ,o m o VVNNmm I a (I N I n f ` I I -1 M1 :x = aR I °s I m I I I ' I ~ >m arvpoowvampJrorvovN my Nr-po0 mmryNNV°V.¢..p°mmNymnom~aNNauoopumpmFemGNrymmN~uoo OPNryPONPNOVNPOPrvOVrymVryONPONm ~NOOO~NQmdryam~ .+ mnr N rrNN N NN O r NaN„m mr _1 w J p~ N w. .n 2 i ~¢ wo ~° ..:=F »wx>W oo ~~ ~w°~r ohm ' ° r Z iN V1- iCZZF Or 2l ~ uian<V r N VYILL _ S _ I _ '- .aJ~'oa° J ,- G wdNw JP o _rae g ., e JVW 06 FUIN J UFr F_FF R K W Rr U.' 3 f=<- 2 rR~'G V.'a ~>¢rN NGGOCN a u~ww ^ YYYOWN ZS V N ¢-rm i w °s>. pz ~c uw P c i w -~ O K NZGSLLy-L~u2 mwiu in rrw r JZSYSS UU¢WY>V •.Rx2¢rd No LLI 2Z UVT E0J)w W u.-ccp rws W zzzx ~ onuW- °R ywuleRm ra-ry Pdz zOrxJ-rzry w> ~ o r '=o LLR.z s •WZR Jo ~,uur Wx~orcax~na nuFCUwN omzzrN zrvau s.->RaWrc ize ¢yv?a oaJrN ruz .rio+a>u-u Gao---J m w urw .Gp x~~"""..z ~r`awovwcs a oxn.-oa 4aa V O JTW• Yrt d.3 JJJ N 'V U>U.u T)iVVVn VJY - ' u zmoa az'.NO zww zopw~rra •iraaaaawi rtr-zwFm wuxu'W-R iJRN¢z mwoouz Nacw uvi z W JttozzWVw Yai J~a N W..J- J zJ jJN .uvvz „ u~> owN - uo~a •a YNisn O N 'nV 2Z >W nPmN r +02 jNVY,~O r~yV r «. u w :Jp: u~y Rm 'Ri.:~u~-V VJVY-'n VUY~w¢v(,~1\].S SJi yr :~-u ~~Omr=L Uo~ Jr¢ w •lYZV-S-G •J YRi•T F rrm JF YNJV~¢JEVOtJR~+-J J.'4M RR20 4'62Z2- W VSZa aZVp~2N Od>JWJ 2w S > rm~n- +2-_1 ZR p_w Oam anFJJSiro000pr N VOrOW N'nGwYOUa WrVi20nm m>OVJJiJNi-F7d6 O-wjyG'VGaL JV IV Vrrt:J wVVwO<u'V ¢uuppatdG<GV¢aara-a0¢m OOCOVUV O¢JO-T-Y<aw»i 6 w Z'/~LLC NGGZiYZ<J ce '~ VVVVVVVVVVVSI'VVV1ViV UV`C Vp~.. . ~ Noryom oNNO~noNmrynaNNOOOrrNOOOOarNNNONNONNOUOnoNOpryomnpomoomo.~Nr-.JeN.+v oyoo U 2 -UNUPmO~rymJOmNrvr~NTNN_-_rOT-mVVrymONOVNn NPNOPUOT00 rr NNM1ONryPOOrrIN000V ON~UODUUOU-vrvnNNmUOmJaNpnPONmmmmVaaJVNNNNJd09JJM1PVn y : Dry-P PryI~T-.a na yrlarymaFmOOPV mI.OP»»V00000000-rr_rrrrrryNryNNNNNNNNrvNNNhnNNNnNN mlr1 0 a<-MO-NmaNOF mpOrNnaNCPOpO^NmNdNmpOrNnyNdNmPOrNn Jin dl•OPOrNmaNOhO POrNNaNOF mPOr mdddnryryrynFl-n.rl-mmm¢mm¢mmmPPCnrvrvNhNnnnnnnnmumjJJyy.Jy r Y.. ~~~rNN~udiw~ud w.J..4.dF .l•. O O=GVGVLVOVVUv'p^=OLO j00<u yyVGP ;r..r.. r.+r u.~.Jrr r .vn .. rr ¢ a OO OOOOpO000VOpU00VOOpU 0000U0000000VUCU0YGOOU0000DO0000U00JU000 VOVOCOOOOODU (! a C° f' (• R R ! n. n u: n ~0 6 P `' n n R i! 4~ ` P <C - ~ - - - ---=-----7 - = ,----- ) {, c mr~o~oo°bpb0+....+..,+„aNryryNNNNryNNNNNNryNNNNNNNNNNNNnNryNryNNNNNNNNNNNryryry ° V _ ---- ---- -- -- --- = I W 2 ~ V V 2 O_ q V D J ~ p Y _ O y W Il gUO..ryn+gtlrmPO~Nn+OtlrgPO~Nn+P~tl 1+m PO~NNVV~tlrgPO~NTVll~0 r0P Or~NnVNtlrmPp~NnVPOPOPO+Nn n u~m Nn°gNV~U r~NV~~~n ru~+m nu~v~u~hnu~N VlN~n u~~l Nan unihv~N N/1NNNNNnNU+1 MU01 Nin ~nN N~rPih nnMrtln MNV~N V~nv~r nr mmnnnmm~nnmmmnnmmm~mm~nnnnnnnnnnnnnnmm~mnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnm~^ ~ q Nn+.nowPp.NnagoroPD.wn+POrmmb.«vn+~normcD.irvn+narmmD.Nn°norma°..nn+~no rooo~N^+^~ e a rrrrrrrr... ,.~mm~^ ~~~~~~~Py~~°NNrnoobb°............_.._~nrvnnnrvnNNNnnnnn~..n nnn.+++(ry,+. s a°otltltlotltlaooeoa eaatl°tltlooi°ooootloo~aaaoouaao oaa oaa o<a oouoao aeo.Neo~oan°°° 2 OOOpO0UD00°OOOOOOOOpO0000000b0000°OOOOOOOOOOOObOOVO0000000VO000pGUU00°00000 ,'sue ~ z .~ ^~S a y f •.C. - - - ~ - - --r r ----- -- ---- ----- -- -- - ----- --- -- - =- -- rv I a I ~~ m II I I -r _ _ - M1I - - mr ~I ~ rv Prr r - ., arN _-0 Nr .. rrv ~ J r N N Tm r r r N rJ N ~I~ e_ m i m ~! - V S O OI O V ll ¢ d _i _ _~ -_ _ ¢I 11 3 mTmmmmmmmnmmmmmTmmmmTTTmT Tm TTTmMmmTTmTmmTTTmmTTTmmTmTTTTTmmTTTmTmTTTTTTnnnm W _ i~ tJl a ZI V z a_ ¢ z a o u ~ o ~ ° u ~ i D i x z W > i 4 , pryN tin nONm000NOVM1ONOmmPO00NmrONONCOONP rO OPF00JnNONNPNnM1PNDm000NF¢mdPOONOP U w FrmmVU pPrrrJy~NNip ONP„rrrTV TmdPTmOP-0mPFmVF~rmVFFPONrvrrvVFFrvmN000NJ00 r'1T ~ppPC ~ h > aYJiJJVViNnNnnNNn00-0OOOOOOd 0000pOrFnrFFPrrFrFnFM1FFFFmVOOdmdmdmmmmm6mmm>mmm0 J U ~ U Q mJNNryryrymmnm Tl^mn m.PnD NmJNOFmpOrNTVNOFmPO/NTJNOFdPOrnIm JN OFOPOrNTaNaFmPOrrymJN< a rvrvN .J.m nnmm~n n.J^m Tnnnnnnnnnond°~n ~mnmmm~nm nfnF ~m.mm^mTmmmmmP,°..°1 nIP"nn °u aaaaanaaaaaaaaaaooaoi+o ocaoceauaaacao.p aco JOa a...ua PO6.oi~m'N a,iJOU..uua.+u'o oo~m oa d C OOOOOOOOOOOODDOODOpODDpO00UUDOOOOO000O000UDO000ci000U0000UUbOOD00000000040J0 'S_ ~ 1 s _ T h~ x f Y Po-NTa~narmpornTa.~armp o..NTanaM1mmorrvmanormp o..Nmandrmpo-nnanormnoPmoooTmn rFM1nN~maNNwmmNOmpP PPP NP pP Paaoooooommo..rrr..rrrrrrvnrvrvrvnnNNrvmnmmmmnnnoarrmoraor aaoaaoaaaaaeaaaeaadaanaaooeoaooorreeaM1r ~mmmmmnmmmnnnnnnn nnmmnnnnn°non°nn°OnnennnnmmmmnnnTnmmmnnmmmmm..Tnm mmmmmnaaaaaaaaas ~I hOPO+~MaNOhOpOrrymJNOFOPOrNmaNarOPOMNnaN OPOPOrN1~1aNOrmPOrrv nandrOPOrN1~1aNYJ0ypr it hNNNrvrvnNNrvNNNHNNrvrvrvNnNhNrhrrrrrrr000m0m0060pPPPPPPPPP0000000000----r LOOOJOa000UJO0aaOJJaO0Oa0YaJaaaOnOadOd00„vJ dLOCadgOUeoaG4JaaaaOOJJLOOCOOJ00 OVOOOGOOOOOOOGOOOOOUOOOOOUOOOpO00O000o~oj00000000000V000000000000000000000000 i +• J ~ 1 ~ r 7 If 1 ) ) ) l~ 1 ) 1 1__ ) 1 1 ) 0 r Z r rrrv + vN O V Z JW O Uu a r i s an r_ r is nTmmmm~mmnmm~mmm~~:m 1 1 ) ) ,)_ ) ) - ~ ~I ~~ ~~ ~' ~~ ~' z <= p u A z /f i °~ n .r o V IA J O V _ O =W 0 _> a oo~nwmoomoonoaaacoo O 2 VVOPYV0P0PY~PPP~V NON rn nPO~rrvTmPPP P(]Y~ > > v>OOOVVPPmPPPPPPP>n F_ u QK nOPO rI~IT V1(~a nOPOrNmV• O i PP, P^OV V\~~uVV~~VVVVJn a aao s 'ooooaoaooao aao aoooooooe 1~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~` ~ 1 1 ~1 1~ 1 1 1 1 ~~ ) ~ ~ ~ CITY ()F RANChlO CUG>,MOIV(',A STAFF REPORT n U Date: March 18, 7981 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Request authorization to complete sale of City land (a portion of Heritage Park) to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for construction of Demens Channel The Council is familiar with this issue, having first reviewed Lhe subject at their meeting of October 1, 1980, and again at the Council meeting of October 15, 1980. In brief summary, the County has submitted to the City an offer of $120,533 far the purchase of 6.804 acres of land and $485 fora temporary easement on .115 acres, both to be used in construction of the Demens flood control channel improvements. The City engaged the services of E.G. H111, an independent land appraiser, to verify the legitimacy of the offer. Mr. Hill's review, submitted to Council previously under separate cover, authenticated the values in County's offer. City Staff has held subsequent meetings with County Flood Control District staff regarding nature and details of proposed improvement and City's rights regarding future access to right-of-way for recreational purposes. We are satisfied with the results of those meetings and that the City will benefit financially and aesthetically from a rapid completion of this transaction. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute attached documents o sa a an easement described therein, and further, authorize the Community Services Director to perform related functions necessary to complete transaction. OFFER TO SELL • r 1 LJ FROi1; CITY OF RANCHO CllCAMONGA RE; DEMENS CREEK P. 0. Box 793 Parcel 122 Aancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T0: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SAN 6ERIlARDIPIO COUNTY For valuable consideration, I/we the undersigned owners of the above subject property hereby grant to San Bernardino County~(FLOOD CONTROL DTST. ); the right to purchase from us that real property described in the attached deed and plat, and/ or the Temporary Right of Entry as required, for the total sum of 5 120,533.00 We agree to sell and convey said property by goad and sufficient deed. The said total sum is derived as follows: Fee 6.804 aczea @ $17,715 per acre = $ 120,533.00 (R) TOTAL $ 120,533.00 Subject to the following teens and conditions: 1. Payment is subject to obtaining an approved Policy of Title Insurance. (No title policy is necessary fora Temporary Right of Entry.) 2. All escrow and title fees will 6e paid by buyer. 3. This offer will expire 90 days from the date hereof unless it is accepted by appropriate action by the Board of Supervisors of Buyer. 4. Buyer shall have an immediate Right of Entry for construction purposes pending close of escrow. 5. Buyer shall have possession at the close of escrow. CITY OF RANCHO COCAh10NGA, a Municipal Corporation •ty ur Date Date: Real Property Agent 7 Offer to Sell 9/77 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATEMENT OF JUST COMPENSATION • D&MENS CREEK Proj ec[• Parcel No.: 122 In compliance with Chapter 16, Sec. 7260 of Div. 7, Title 1 of Government Code and based on a recent appraisal that provided the estimate of fair market value of your interest in [his property, it has been determined that just compensation, which is not less than the appraiser's opinion of fair market value, for said interests is as follows: Value of real property acquired $ 120,533.00 Damage to remaining real property (when appropriate) $ -0- Amount established as just compensation $ 120.533.00 Type of property being acquired: Land- Improvements- Fixtnres_ Interest being acqul red by: Fee x Easement- Right of Entry_ Legal Description Of Property County, location, etc. Those portions of Lots 7 and 8, Block 14, according to the Map of the tract of land of the Cucamonga Homestead Association, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps, page 46, records of San Bernardino County • The valuation is based on an inspection of your property by a qualified appraiser, and an analysis of all pertinent factpzs, including the information provided in an appraisal that has been received and approved in conformance with Chapter 16, Sec. 1260, Oiv. 7, Title 1 of Government Code. My increase or decrease in the fair market value before the date of valuation caused by [he public improvement or project for which [he property is [o be acquired or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for such improvement or project, other than that due to physical de[eriorat ion within the reasonable control of the owner, has been diszegarded In making the determination of just compensation. Signed: Da[e•~ GW:bh 5-21-80 G Real Property Agent • Date: Statement of Just Compensation 8/76 COUNSY OF SAN AERYAADINO Real Property Division 825 East Third Street ~n Bernardino, CA 92415 14) 383-3323 Project Demens Creek Parcel No. 122 TS[le No. 728481 Escrow No. R E A L E S T A T E A G R E E M E N T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA referted to n SCLLCR) abw ln6 tft l< vea«d In (here{w <r<r «Eerr<d tow Np(G) tar praprr tY derc r lD<d on [Fe a[tacbent Mn[a Ma De<n del lv<red Lv tM Ceunq of Sw Srrnndlw [hrov3h a Rwl P[opert) Apnt <t [M1< PYDlIr Vor k< A{ewY~ a Vfll De delivered [o Ffrst Aw[lcan ttt le Imm<nr< Cnpa<y by SCLtnI. IT IS '.".'W'ALLY ALRE EB eY il:'_ PARTIES MCR[i0: SCY LR v[l: moat [a r e((!<t1v< a of the date a( [1[L [una(er, flU1fEVER, SGIFR aM 11 [aln 11.6E (or W9.<n[ of wY wewd • pv«u<nt t tn< prev[alona of Sec [ton G986, 411f e[nSa RNlnue 6 Tavtfon redo, . lnaed. MI nlutM or ei<ew of preps ld «wa viii n..ve t^ pe app lleJ fo[ ai te[ close of e¢mv by tM1! SELLER v1IM1 tn! ptnper taaln8 autMrltl. SUY [P her [I,e rl8ht of In,aed l<« a [rY [o <u!]!C[ p[op<r[Y Ea[ <ana[ru[[1on purpe.e.. Ce.aea.len [e !! [GVIn t< SUTCR by SELLG •L the rte r< D( ret rev, ' 5 [LLCx v tMt Nen • nl o yr l[[en lout < •11 o anY port tan o[ [M1< aubJ ect prop<rtY < <eedSnA . prc5od at am wntM1 atlrtr [hanr[M1~se reported o [M1e~t[achedr0.en[ Cn[a<nL the EF1LG a{[e a to Mltl SUTCR Mnlw aM [elnbur a SUYG (or mY aM •Il la• and upemw a«wfon<dnDY rwaon <( wY a reported lww< pn <Il o[ wl Tnlan of N< rvbl«t pr<perp < nN[n3 a p<[lad of one wntn~ IN TN[ !v[8 SfItER if uwbte m deliver tl[L (n • t wowble [fw vmer [ba tem of [hb Aerwwnt, MIYll wY (lb m ae tlon In nlnmt Jo-.oG w par w< <he ac8u «lt ton of int! prt«l, amttMa Aere wn[ aM ll cans tf iv« . •tlpv la t ton Mleb uy Da If led In wltl • pm eee Iota u l tool ana cone lua[v< atdlrc< of tM tent <rount o/ w.Penw [ton for tM uk[nR. daw3fn{, ]ou of Dual n<as, Eoodvlll or anY<otnar cla tar url>Inx (r,w tha [.ki nR. ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS - BUYER T0: First American Tltle Insurance Co. {urea .Sr< n pvaM« [n. pr^prctr Je.<rmed o a«<nnen[ f<r . mad < wumaw ^( S 120, 533.00 .m uw r~rn t^ vu are ^r the sae net.^f nom re< wfd < nam.«uen. [^R~.th<r .an .nr aaaumw rvm. mm nr 1^.«<wa. n arY to evelY vlrn t a ne uop all ^( vn l<n rou rr u e Men Y^u < n larva tour anJVre < veraRe torn pot l<Y of rltb tnrv «nce Vftn 1[a I11[Y ~ fi loan the aw un[ a[d[ed ae [o tnl [ono ld era [i onraa novln8 [I[I<aV <a l¢d in CL'Y fP, Ilea <( all It lru am en<u tl«n<ea ^( ««« Lt: EUi: It 1. AnY toast leln[ of Ren<«I and epee let < untY sM cl[Y t if ant, that 1. m[ ant Ire lY a rued a tM [lee tl<la b rnw- f<rrM to u phyy teal porae.elon b [e ken by B4YfR, uM1 lcheve[ u<tun flu t. ]. tics 3 b /. .nun .vpwr o^ v«ua^.rr ntle r.wrt ^mb<r 728481 Jne <e Junc 7, 1979 {erEx .tr « o p,r rlrn ua. prnwm, <e<rw f<a, natal^g («t, r<rvem mg feet. «nata (!!.. «[<.lrw<! (<«, .m .nv lwl- dln tat <nar 0.r a. rr All •I lrpvr rna 11 b< rxae DY Y^vr cM<4, All (um• rrlved In iota a nna ll be deport ud In o of Yaur pn nl in« v ~ nanY dnl n8 bualrte tt In the Stae of Gllf orn« and vY De trr na(erred t anY other ben «I a wnt n un «~<oi by ea pre rslnn "<loae of r s the Late ^ uM1 lcn Inn Vimenb r<hrtW m b<rcln t e !Ilea (ot r ord`ouAl lradJ mtwnn r< a D<:.W< o e Du lr e( a tFlrt YrJaY u ntb, Rtt mda[IVn of mY Ina vumenu del twat ed tnrou4M1r to if a if n ery or propee In We luvann of n pot (ay v( tl[le lmun nee called foL 6 M1ereby rvthorl tad. he<u[< on bens lC of the per[IeruMntoerf<n aulgrren[• ( to «raa In .nv to ru ra ore po llrto (otn<r loan Rtle Inrvren<e) aped Eor M1er eln am tervard ton uvon cbw of nem to [ne ag en °nal v rr.um t,~(Ir r, eMr (mnr er conamt to rune<«nna (er o •ttn<M1tlma-vanele cbvn or wko rvM ot"r eae It lonivor correct Iona h..e n •pe.ul.<ur r«w«d Mn«; am : om, tMt [De .g<n mrc«(!!r mrwra er<n pouatu a tM p.rt l<. <nu [lad t ton. •11 a.tn In ttA is e¢ nta 4 n3 m ([re Imuu nc e, Inc lad (ng ad]u e[nen b, Ef anY• You nMll be (u 11Y Dro eud In alas n{ thrt n<R .urh pot l<r Ir In to r[era nd [Mt <Fr nt<et arY pt<.tuo [M re[or< hat De<n pl ld. r<u a < t< fu Mlab a copy of tow! fort tact fans, awndnen tr tNUto. <loaln{ rratewna am/ar anY datu.enu depoal «d In enb e I!e Iemrc or lend ee a. rut a au bnk<r or bropn. and/<r Iw rctornlY or coo nqa Iw<IVed (n the trav«t1^n upon nquw< <i «[ntumrra, br<k. n, er amrn,y,.a Page 1 of 2 sheale re+ bdmre n arts ele.a era mtv. ar b,eome . a! anY rmntafne eernm a ml.l., mf to ra.mr[ [ rbl. v []ve rlnnu u el [nr wrtlma Lere[o. o aorv.onq or vmperry dupuat«J tweeto m Jrecue lurubr.rr^+.Wll Mve the ntM to aba'munr aer ~~ au l~rrn.r , n rnmr rvrt onto .mrn mnuttr to r rmw to year r[f.e,rr mn, ,w ynm .MU Mve [M rartnr rt4u to [ .v m Jelv~J n etton urtpra<eeJ lnP !ot [ne detevlm[lo~ a! such coot lltt, tM Dar[lu Mrcm JnInt 1Y aM • ral1Y ^Frev [n P,Y all .~<n . darueea~ Indl;aenta aM e.penarm, IncIW InL r Nble a[torneYn' f<u, au(lerw nr incurred by Yon In ~ ect~on lit N. u .rltlnF ..utter tbly .~ bm luJtnµ. but vltLwe llmt[ln{ the tonersll[Y o! tbv foteµolnF. , ,uLL 4: Interplenda•r brwFM by Yvu, In tM ev you (tie a nu t: r,ln Ina.r PltaJer, You atoll tpmo tacro be lul1Y [<Itovtl +M JUC1urRw Lrw al] obit F^[lona lrymw on Y^u In [M1la ant rn[ If for my r n funJa + e reulned er ratio In e,c[ou Yvu an w dwuc[ [Mre[rw , ruaoNble en[nlY eMge a euatndlan tM1e[~ or nm[ le,e tb.tn it lefor 'Dorn, r Tlrn tr Jvc lar.J [o be t or then 1N[rv[[toN. 1f YW Nbl< t0 CorylY vf[b tn< [lr zp[elflw hermlo aM w[M1 addl- t lmml tlr as la tvgn lrvd t N4era mnlN[lan a! the o((lelal r erda+rYOU viii r all dncurnu, rrY. ar proper[Y [ [be party n[I[letl [bvrmty ~y»,n z,tlalnc [arY vrl[[<n daurd a:M autMr[utfoneL AnY nmtMrn[ attend/er auPPlament t anY Im[[uctlonv rat be to lit It ln8. SLLLIR .n mu to .all aM BDYCF greo [o bu) tM prepetq herein describes open the t ru hereof. ineae e u Imtruct lone and ameMrnO neuto r) n< a tutM In one o[ ~, unte[Nru, rcn o! Mlen Irtlepmnden[1Y atoll Mve the sane eRe¢taa 1( le were the or let Nl. aM mil e( Mlen liken tme[her atoll emrtlcuu ene and tM lime lrvuct tov. u [Ire tlau of ea[[ u you lie [o de1{ver Fll dxurvu~ mtu~ to the Ceunty e( San hrNtOlr, 0.ee1 Pmperp Dltl<len. LWMT OP SAH LLLMLDIIq LY • a AdID1nlSCraCOLp . . ESCROW SNSTRUCTIONS -SELLER LK approve et [n< tar<LOInE imtructmN anE asm ro aeu ava vu1 aenver [o You yven. fluervrnn aMlor lama rnutrM Ito. ulthtn [ne time Ilolr rprt t(tea nmeln, uhlch You ur ,utlnrttea tv aeltve[ uhen Yw un t<we Your potty o! [Ltle Svuunce a pt lo[[h abve. t aLree m paY anY paNOnal p[ap<[tY Ua« p[ape[lY eNrpabl< to x. You rte Im[rvctea m PaY rm. thrt aunt arom a tM tout mnafdautfon above snap au. a ry e. amrNad (or [ne raliovfnp • At tM rime pl r.tr u Ypu are to tuLl Yvur th,tt .M .nY dn[nrnu {yWt1.` oLay, gyt(tyta tq,[liq_F8d[gp1;oow b<,w. Deno: _ la Municipal Corporation .ware.,. • ~V Pn ¢o 2 of 2 ~ ~- 5 grcoa mxc qro°ESr eo or axo wx6n gecogp[o I.Ait ro SAN BEBNAROINO ODB MTY FL000 ppNTRBL pI5TRI0T E36 East Thlra SNeH SNr Bagarllne, Callhrmla 51419 SPICE AB°VE 1x15 LINE f°F uEC°gpE Y'S VSE qou cT Demena Creek CORPOPASION o[[o Mixp.: 1-600/53 Grant Deed I xp, tn]90/090 gaCUx[x 18 111 i FOP A VALUABLE CONSIOEAAiION, recnp5 0l wNCx a xereby acknoeledgetl A,P.N.e: 1061-661-01 , 1061-661-05 (Ptn), (Ptn), CITY OP MNCBJ NCAMON .A, A Municipal Cprpou tlon 1061-641-04 (Pro) M1ereM GRANTS rp roe SAM BEMAg01N0 LOUNtt ROOD CON]MJL 019'gICT, a Mdy [eryprare end poi dlc, She lolloxmp described mal prvperry in SCeL try of Ran cha Cucamonga, County of San Bemertllre. Sure of Cab bm:a. Throe portions o[ Lute i and g, Blxk lIr ac¢ordl p9 eo CM Map o[ 11I the scat[ of lend of the Cucamonga Bweacead Aasoct alt on, as per • plat ttro[tled in Book 6 of Maps, page 16r retards of Ban Be[natdin° County deecrleed ae Eollaxa: ^PARC¢ A^ Those po[tlona o[ said Lp[a J end 0 deaC[I bed as [ollwa: B6IWENG at a 1-loch County 5u[veyor Monument marking the lnte[aection of the centerline of B<ryl Avenue 166 fee[ aide) elth the cane<rli ne of Hllla tde Road (66 teat vide) as said Interaactlan is ahoxn an County 9urveyo[ Plat No. ]118 tiled In Me Ottlce o[ th< San Bernardlrw County Su[veyor; Mentt along sold centerline o[ Hil lelde Road NorN 89° ]3' 11" Nest, 86.19 tee4 thentt South 91° Jo• 2l^ Neatr ill./] te¢t; ehence along s line hereina [ter [e(e[[ed [o a¢ 'Line A', 9ooth 50° I6' 3]" Heat. 119/.02 feet [o a polo[ hereinafter re[erred tm ar 'Point Ay Nenee ae rlghe angles North J6° 1J' 1]' Neat, 1.00 Eeet, to a po/nt Aerel na [ear roEe[ced to ae 'Point B^; thence South 5l° 16' ))^ Meet, 159.41 feet to a point In the Southerly p[olongatlrn of tha ea et line °[ lM1af pa[c<1 o[ land deec[ibed as ^Pa[cel B", In document reco[ded in Booh 6185r page JJ) Official Rececda pE sold C°un ty, said pplnt Cal n9 die Cant along said Sou the[ly prolongs ti on 6ou th 0° 11' OS' Nece, gg.8] Eeat from [he Northeasterly me ner of se ld 'Pamei R"; ehen<e along Bald Sou cperly pcolon9atlon Emu eh D° 1/' OB^ Neee, 1J 5.51 Eeet m e line that !a pa [al iel vl <h and dtstan[ Sputheaeter ly 106.00 feet r 1 I3, .., i., I. . f ~ Oemena Creek - Parcel 133 ,~ lp)90/09030 - 4-3-60 (l) Erin he[einee[om defaibed 'Litt A'; thence aloip said parallel • line !bah 93° /6' I]• Nase, 519.95 feet to a point hereimfter [eferred to as ^POint C^; Chentt continuing along said pacailel line Nor[h 63° I6' ]]' ba[, 1.015.1] [ee[; [perms North R° 30' 33` Gat, 159.51 feet [0 a point in the cen[er 11M of esid 0<[yl Avenue, Wald poi n[ helrp distant along esid interline Sou[h 0° 1]' 39^ Neat, 6).06 tee[ [ca the point of 491nnin9; Mence sling uld ttn[e[3(0< No[[h 0°, 1>' 39' beet, 6].06 felt to toe pot nC of eegl rvii ng. Cmtalnlrp 1.911 ac[ee, note or leu. 'PARCPJ, B^ 1'Imse pot time of said Lnee ] ana a deu[lhed as follova: BBOINNLNG a[ Aenineefo[e Mee iced 'Pore! A'; thence along the herelnbefore bete lead 'Gina A^ North 63° 16' 13• Gat, 360.00 [ee[; tAeece North 36° 1J' 3T Nent, 1]6.91 feet; thence Noi the[ly. 1653 feet slap a non-tangent Nrve, cmceve Ntater lyr Mving a radl ue of ]6].78 te<e, a antral angle o[ ]° 00• /9^ and a beglrming Gn9mt eau irp Cf North 19° 99' lt• Mnt, uld curve hetelnsEter referred to as 'Guru! A'; [hence qor eh 33° 00• 00^ Neat, 31.91 feep Mence at right angles gorlh 6)° 00• 00^ PHtr • 10.00 racy Uence HorM 31° 00' 00" Neal, 385.00 felt; thence at rlgh[ angles South 61° 00• 00" Mu[, 100,00 fee[; thence at tight angiea South 3l° 00' 00^ Gscf 385.00 feet' chance at right angles SBUN 6)° 00• 00^ Naa[, 5.00 feet{ thane! Smth 33° 00• Oo" Beat, 31.91 feet to a line [pat Ss parallel wLN and distant Neaterly, 165.00 race Erin here inbeCo[e deac[leed 'Curve A^; Mence Southerly, 167.]0 teat slap said pu allal Ilner Oeln9 a tangent Nrvt, raancave Masterly, having a radius °[ 196.78 Eeee and a cent[al erp le Cf /B° 11' 1)9 thence South 61° I9' iP Gat, 61.00 Leet; [hence 9mlhareaterlyr 139.35 C<at slap a non-tangene curve, concave Nocehweatecly, Nvln9 a redlue Ct 369.78 [a t, e central angle of 30° 31' 16^ and a beglnninq tangen! Wad nq of 9ouCh 36° 11' 17• Neat; chance South 93° 16• 3]^ Neae, ]0.60 Eeet to here lnba[ore deacrlped •POtn! 0•; thence South 36° 13• 3T fesL 3.00 Leet to the polo[ °[ hegl Oning. Contalning 1,131 street core °[ lees. •PAtlCEL C" Those pot tiom o[ said tote ] and 8 deecr lped as follws; eB03NNING at heref naeEOre described 'Polne C"; thence along [he • 9N Neaate fly ilea of her<lnpe fo[e deuflped 'Pa [eel A" Nor eh S3° 'r' Sheet 3 °[ ] eheee• _ I~ ~ r Demena Creek - Paccel 123 1W 90/090]8 ~ 4-3-80 (J) a6' l3• Eaet• 300.00 feep [Hence at right angles SoOCA )6° 13' 3]' Eaa[r 9].00 Eeet to a ilne tAe[ is paraliel Nieh and dla[ant So0[Aeaabrly 9'/.00 feet fiW said Ewtheas[erly line of •Pa[Cel A•p tAerse along ea(e parallel line South 93° 16' 3P Neae, 300.00 feeq thence at right angles No[tA 36° 3J' 37•r West, 97.00 Eeet to CAc paint Of beglruling. Carta fining 0.115 sates, mre o[ levy. CITY OF 9ANCH0 CVCA`IONCA, A Nwielpal Carpe[a[Iw DP iED' ~ WIiNE55 1 .1 VI n11AlIP II1 Vl\ ~fi\ rll VT3' IIE .. .. ...I.• ntarr Inlr lr rr nrml lnr +ar rl /rw rnr anA Sla v,rr rwnvl lr \nn.n re mr ra Ir. rn. _ _ .Irr.r.l. aril. ____ _ _._ . Inn. rr . I~ nl rAr Ilrr r rr nin Inre um rnl. In+•nar.~ r. ~l rl.. n Inarrn mrnr nn n•M1 VII nlr lFr lr nr ryrrannn vi M1r nrn rnr rri 1, v • Iv ln~nrM mlin rrr'al rV leV nl rnl 1 ^IVr tort ar'r urnr len rr • r rr r r r I rFr r n Arrr i,m Srrnvlr r nl i\nrV r \'a m.~ rlrrr.l nr I'r.n reAr M iYnrn t rsesolutiuN ... - .... •... ~ on mmmn °r wpr~~~~na ~. ~rav A,r I m nn nv srnrrvunr m rt!r rrl rr v. Inrt lm lnxrnp rezoln nnn rs aMm.t aM ornm mane' 0E It PF SGLVF.D, Inw dnr nl , 10 _, by inn Bnarrf of Supcrvrsors e! fie Snn Brr mlr ne Cowmr Frenn Coal mi Crsln el, Slaly nl Cab lom I lhr eonvw znee Im !n Inr SAn B•martlmn Cn nnrv I'I rnx fnnlml 0.zrn.l, Sl nin nl Cah brni p, pr„ andrt iz (rn rrhv accwlnY., lnr Inn pu gros os ' 'r nil in l~nirnn+ ~r~ In nr nin 5nl la tin anti 6E II FVI11rv Efl Ha<pLV ED Ill of a r'nniLnd rcmv nl Ilw nwnlmmn bn aua<Ircr! In sam rlmal antl Ilal lnq snrd nalrnmr„I lrr ,.. ;rrn r ,,ralr[ r,r nrr.r,,rrrrlr nr.r,nrnr., nl nrr l.nnnlV nl spn e.•Innrn~ro, slab nl c,Mrrornra. .mn Irian rrr nrr rrmrs nl mis ti,nnn. stare DF cnuroxdn ~ COUrvn Oc Sarv eEaNJn01N0 I 14' . Snnrn ury nl nn MnrA nl Euumw mrs nl p+r San Errnanlrnn Cmmrv Flwn C.+.r pnl ' C Wn I, San 6rrn,vdino form iv, Ca plnm la, M1rrelly rrrL lv Inr Inr.•nnmq In Ae a htl 1, Irrn antl v'orrncl <cPS el n.. ru. 'lllinn dl'C rq lrnV 1'rr in 51Nm rn1 nni~A IS a pirl Ilr r•IrU I. 13 COUNTY OP SAN BERNARDINO STATEMENT OF 7UST COMPENSATION ' Project: DEMENS CREEK • Parcel No.: 187 In compliance with Chapter 16, Sec. 7260 of Div. 7, Title 1 of Government Code and based on a recent appraisal that provided the estimate of fair market value of year interest in this proper cy, it has been determined that just compensatlon, which is not less than [he appraiser's opinion of fair market value, for said interests is ae follows: Value of real property acquired $ 485.00 Damage to remaining real property (when appropriate) $ -0- Amount established as just compensation $ 485.00 Type of property being acquired: Land Improvements- Fixtures- Interest beYng acquired by: Fee_ Easement x Right of En[ry_ Legal Description of Property County, location, etc. That portion of Lot 7, Block 14, Cucamonga Homestead Association, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of Maps, page 46, records of San Bernardino County The valuation is based on an inspection of your property by a qualified appraiser, and an analysis of all pertinent factors, including the information provided in an appraisal Chae has been received and approved in conformance with Chapter 16, Sec. 1260, Div. 1, Title 1 of Government Code. Any increase or decrease Sn the fair market value before the date of valuation caused by the public Improvement or project for which the property is to be ecqulred or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for such improvement or project, other than [hat due to physical deterioration within the reasonable control of the owner, has been disregarded in making the determination of just compensation. Signed: Address Real Property Ageat • Date• Date:_ 2-11-80 Statement of lust Compensation 8/76 ~~I ~ OFFER TO SELL . FROId: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REt UENENB CREEK P. 0. Box 793 Parcel 187 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T0: BOARO OF SUPERVISORS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY For valuable consideration, I/we the undersigned owners of the above subject property hereby grant to San Bernardino County (elood conerol Oist. ); the right to purchase from us that real property described in the attached deed and plat, and/ or the Temporary Right of Entry as required, for the total sum of $ 485.00 We agree to sell and convey said property by good and sufficient deed. The said total sum is derived as follows: Easement ; 485.00 TOTAL ~ 485.00 Subject to the following ternis and conditions: 1. Payment is subject to obtaining an approved Policy of Title Insurance. (No title policy is necessary for a Temporary Right of Entry.) 2. All escrow and title fees will be paid by buyer. 3. This offer will expire 90 days from the date hereof unless it is accepted by appropriate action by the Doa rd of Supervisors of Buyer. 4. Buyer shall have an inmiediate Right of Entry for construction purposes pending close of escrow, 5. Buyer shall have possession at the close of escrow. n LJ Date: Real Property Agent Oate: I~ Offer to Sell 9/77 X31EN flECODOFD. fiETUNN @ ' >s &rnaNin9 Cwull ikM EonGpl Dnbt[t AIS E[R ihrtl Still 6aa &meNino. Gl:hmo 9]115 In Cart at Aa6b6C.at Eepruer L a 1 ?¢N PONANY ¢A6¢N SNT 5 6 YOR VAWABL¢ CCH6IDBAATIONr [moeip[ of rhleh Sa M[eby ukrwrledgetl, CITY I OP ¢ANCNd CDCAMONGA, a w:lelgl ro[poralfon, dxa MreOy g[ant ro ell B SAN BF.NUPDIND CWN1y RllDO CQPLAOL DISTRICT, a EodY ro[q[ate and 9 politic, ita auccown and aaigna a wqu[y eaaeamc for oroeeruetion 10 0[ tha Onlted 6ta4a kvy Ca[q of D:gin<eM Cucamonga Creek P[oj<ec M 1: CM x1d Co[pa o[ Orglneeu, CM ban eerne[dlm Cmmly Rood Control ]: Diner tee, all/or graona une¢ eonlra<[ r1N DoeA or a1Mer o[ !ha utd lJ Co[pa o[ R,94rwe[s and tM sale Dlat[le<, tMl[ ot[le<[a, a9mts end 11 aployna duf l,q a 11-mooch q[lad roa~eacLMJ upon tM dace o[ Snf efal 1: ~ oceugtlan by wY o[ tM atow ule Pocsons [o[ oonat[uctlon pucpwas, 19 Mt trts(ne[ing no late[ than duly ll, 1963, inr ova and se[oaa chat real pmgrty aiewee in ell cley of RaneM cuamonga, County of San lB I ¢e[na[dlw, State of Callto[nf a, dew[lhed ae tollwar 19 ]0 TMt po[tlm o[ Lot ), ¢lmk 31, Cucamonga floneetead Aaaocletlro, as qr ]l pine rerorded to eock 6 of qpa, qge /6, ruorda of San ea[na[dino ]] Coweyr lying rlthln a ]6 toot ride a[[ip of ]and tM No[cAwcerly line IJ of said strip d<ecdhed as tollwa: 11 35 : , , I6 , : : Ii , : ze ~ : , , 39 ~., , ]0 r , I Jl I] Ocvrena Creek Channel -Parcel O.Y. 1-400/5) - lE]90/0600] APN 1061-641-02 (Ptn) 9/l9/19 (U \/ ~q _ ] Ie~Ueal Lr I V • • 1 a 5 6 ]' fill .~ -~ i 1: 3: iJ II 1: I: l] 18 19 I 30 ill ll l 31 r 11 31 35 i 36 ~ 3l r 33 39 )0 ll 33 I 17 I:Or 1:11 Demen3 Creek Channel - Parcel 13] O.P. 1-400/53 - lE ]90/0800] APM 1061-641-02 (Pen) 9/19/]9 (1) Cwwmcin9 at a 1 loch County SUr veyer Monument verking the in[erae°tlon of the centerline o[ fl111 aide Road X66 fttt vide) xlth [he can to [line o[ aryl Avenue (66 feet xl de); !hence almg fald ttn[erline of Beryl Avenue SouN B° i]' 33' Neat, 6].06 feeq [Noce South 33° 30' 33" weaq 159.Sa feed thence South 53° Ib' 3]' Nm[r 13x.30 [eee tm Me point of De9lm Srgp [hence cwlti nuing South 3]° a6' 33• Motr 300.00 feet [o the point o[ te[mination. Cen4 in 41q 0.115 ac[ery mole ec leas. IN NITNF33 NBpIkOP th la Easement la executed and •i9nad NL day o[ _, 19]_ Nltneaa CITY OP A333C110 CUCAMONOA Mayo[ Ctey clerk fix 11 rrl rAI if 111r V1 a. - 1 \1 rlrl \t1 rll 1) rr le li... n.. .. vn.l.r r n.~l.a \nr..r I'nl~ln irr .r..l I..r .ri.l r..i. r. rr rrl Nar.. r.r rn.lll rrl ... .. iii i~•rr rn mr r.. Ir rM1r I m.r.l..nr an.l _ ..rA.r. Ir., r Iv.. ..I rl~. \ni..n n. ...... i. n Iii .. I,I .il r ..L,i .;'~~.1 I ...r r,..r r , ... n..~e~e ~~~ ..I n.n•n.n I r n.^. m.. --_-.~ - .Le~.a nor nl \..rrn _ - . \.n. I~.~In I'ri il'r.I Mnnr ~_ l~ QTY OF RANCI-10 Cf.`CAMONGA STAFF REPORT u DATE: March 18, 1981 ~p Y_~7~t5 TO: City Council and City Manager L•-MIS., FROM: Lloyd 8. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of North Town Street and Drainage Improvements The North Town Street and Drainage Improvement Project has been completed to the satisfaction of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the City Engineer. It is recommended that the Council approve acceptance of the project and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and release performance surety. RECOMMENDATION . Council accept as complete the North Town Street and Drainage Improvements and pass a Resolution authorizing the City Engineer to £ile the Notice of Completion and release performance bonds. :blc Attachments ~~ - RESOLUTION N0. ~ I - 3 A RESOLUTION OF Tl1E CITY COllNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE NORTH TOWN STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORR WHEREAS, the construction Of street and drainage improvements on Humbol[ Avenue, 24th Street, 25th Street, and 26th Street have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying [he work complete; NON, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that [he work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED [his 18th day of March, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M, Wasserman, City CLerk J RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAPIONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: • 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: S[ree[ and drainage improvements on Humbol[ Avenue, 24th Street, 25th 8[reec and 26th Street between Turner Avenue and Marine Avenue. 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320-C Baseline Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California91730. 3. On the 26 ch day of February , 1981, there was com- pleted on the hereinafter described real property the work of im- provement set forth in the contract documents for "Notch Town Streec and Drainage Improvements" 4. Tfie name of the original contractor for the work of im- provement as a whole was Robert Escudero, Inc. , 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Street and drainage improvements on Humbol[ Avenue, 24th S[reee, 25th Street and 26ch Street between Turner Avenue and Marine Avenue. • ~ - _- _ .. CITY OF RAI~f-IO CUC_4MOrK;A STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1981 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer CVCn.NO . ~° ~`O~ n < a r O '' O F'-lyl ~ Z U > 1977 SUBJECT: Quitclaim Deeds for Abandonment of Easements on Chestnut Street • Mr. Victor Cherbak, by quitclaim deed on February 11, 1981, released the road and utility easements on a portion abandoned of Chestnut Street to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Since Chestnut Street has been abandoned by the City, it is in the best interest of the City that these easements be quitclaimed to the property owners. Attached are the deeds and a resolution approving such action. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing execution of said instruments by the City Engineer. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:jaa Attachments dI RESOLUTION N0. $~-3,7 • R RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AND EXECUTING A QUITCLAIM DEED. Acting on the recommendation of the City Engineer, the City Council takes the following action to execute Quitclaim Deeds in connection with abandoment of easements on Chestnut Street; WHEREAS, the subject matter of this resolution having been duly considered and it appearing that the following action is proper and is taken in the best public interest; NOIJ, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that it authorizes execution and granting of the Quitclaim Deeds in favor of Robert D. White, James G. Powers, and Kenneth C. Byrne involving the property which is fully described in said Quitclaim Deeds, and; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by said City Council that it authorizes execution of said instrument by the City Engineer for and on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1981. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren t1. 4lasse rman, Li ty Clerk ~~ I.1 N, k. / W_ S.tS. b.N e~ 1 SEC. 14 P0. R. 4 • ~ ~ - P.NL 1:20 S C._°. CC. EASE ENF HAP 14.E-3H-HH PKR_2 .. ~- ~ ~ ~ - .- ~ EA§EMEB~ FOR ROAD AND DTILITY PORPOSES TO PROPERTY OWNERS ' NS9'65'14 c _ ~ nvt-ti 92U~~AnY WNITE POWERS BYflNE l t g'S ~ PAR 3 i ' PAR 4 Q`y - ! e~ f _ . 1~ ' PAR.1 I P< Hl 7.a. G t PR P..~ . P.K, 3299 I/ • 1 ~ 1 _z ~ P~'dn.~~. ~- _ ~ 589'45'1?"iY , OFFER Of 6 DEDItgTION . f C _W ~- INuICATES CDUA"I"f VACATED -!il:II~L,T.S CITi V<CATcD i~OFiTTt CITY OP ITrM: _ ~ R~~\CI-10 CL'C~1~10\GA TIT,,E:_ ENGINEERING DN(SION E~aim1T: ~J SG1LE N.T.S. ~- City of Rancho Cucamonga .'.:.m'" P. 0. box 793 `; ; LRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 on w uomrm ,a Mwr pp..~ ~Mrnr CM, "'" L J I SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR gECOROE q'S USE pOCVMENr4RY TRANSFER TAR f _COMOUTEO ON GULL VALUE OF pPCIERTY CONVEYEO~ _OR COMRITEO ON FULL VALVE LES UEnB ANO ENCUMBMNC6 REMUININO AT TIME OF Y.IE. 9pn,tw~ pl D,cbnm ar Ap,m a~lrmininp r b F'xm N,rrr Corporation Quitclaim Deed FORA VALIIADLE LONSIDERATIDN, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The City of Rancho Cucamonga a corporation organized under the laws of [he state of California hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to Kenneth C. Byrne and Sandra M. Byrne, husband and wife [he following described real property in the City of Rancho Lucamon ga, County of San Bernardino, State of California: An easement for road and utility purposes over the north 30' of parcel 4, of Parcel Map 3298. Said Parcel Map recorded in Book 30, page 80, Book of Maps, San Bernardino County. • ~~ pECOROING REOUE3TE0 BY • City of Rancho Cucamonga ... P. 0. Box 793 •_,'. LRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 J 1 '^' L I S-hCE I,lOVf TNIS LINE FOR RFEORDCR'! USE OODUMENi.XgY Tq.ENSEEq T11X 1 _ _ ~COMIUTED ON FULL V/LLUE OF fRCICgTY CONVEYEp, _OR MM1VVIED ON FVK V/.WE LE4 UEIS LND ENCUIMpMX;ES gEMFJNIN6 I,T TIME pf SALd. spm ei Ow.r r wa.ni a .rmininE u Fbm n.rv Corporation Quitclaim Deed FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The City of Rancho Cucamonga a corporation organized under the laws of the state of California hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to Robert 0. White and Suzette K. White, husband and wife s [he following described real grope r[y in [he Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga, Coun [y of San Bernardino, State of California: An easement for road and utility purposes over the north 30' of parcel 2, of Parcel Map 3298. Said Parcel Map recorded in Book 30, page 80, Book of Maps, San Bernardino County. ~` BY "Y- rCity of Rancho Cucamonga :~ P. 0. Box 793 ';.; LRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1 SRACE ABOVE TN19 UNE FOR R[CORDER'3 UBC OOCIwAENTAgV TMebfE/1 YAN E _ ~_COMIUTEO ON FULL VAIUE Of TPEIIIV CONVEYF-. ~Oq lO1.YVlFO d1 FULL VIILOE LFS IIEHS ANO EHCIIMERA11~6 gEA41N1110 AT TIME Of SAIf. SIMKMF of SKY/, nt o, AOMt ONr mInME Y,. RMm N~m~ Corporation Quitclaim Deed ' r .Y,,...IrY~.m Nr iM.l W~ (M '""' L FOR A VALUABLE GONSIDERATIDN, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The City of Rancho Cucamonga a corporation organized under the laws of the state of California hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to James G. Powers and Lynn L. Powers, husband and wife [he following described real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • County of San Bernardino, State of California: An easement for road and utility purposes over the north 30' of parcel 3, of parcel Map 3298. Said Parcel 1•fap recorded in Book 30, page 80, Book of Maps, San Bernardino County. LhW OF. IC ES Or' ° r. aLrEe SURR S HELLVER • POaEPML a r. °Cw •.w orc5 i y°L CO weo nnV w ~n " EO WnR 019 o92i9 ae 91 HOC 5 599 • wPE°D . r"c5"F s'. O~i 9a a1 [a5 ' °Cwin"r J $AN BERNAR OINOCCALIFORNIA 92012 ~s.~w orr v~o ae..o o. PLOD i w Ew WOO; ra mE5 O rrC" ;,Eq „`~; '„`"'"`, March 6, 1981 r ~ ~'_ i 47 C ~ CITY OF~RANCHO CUCAtdONGA °""""~ "°'' ADMINISTRATION P,iAR ~ 7 1381 Lauren Wasserman, City Clerk AM City of Rancho Cucamonga 71819110111112111218 I ~ 9320 Baseline Road - I~ $ (i Rancho Cucamonga, CA Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 9441 on February 25, 1981; Resolution No. 81-20 Dear Mr. Wasserman: This office represents Mark IIZ, the applicant with respect to Tentative Tract Map No. 9491. Enclosed is our client's appeal of the Planning • Commission's conditional approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 9441 as expressed in Resolution No. 81-20 approved February 25, 1981. Also enclosed is our check in the amount of $100.00 payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga representing the required appeal fee pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 1.401.10. Please address all notices and other correspondence regarding this appeal to: Surr 6 Hellyer (FJD) A Professional Corporation P. O. Box 6086 San Bernardino, CA 92912 If you would like to discuss this matter prior to the hearing on the appeal we will be happy to do so. Very tzuly yours, SURR & HELLYER A P ESSIO`M\^1`A-L~\1 CORPO • Byl James D, S~ffe JDS/kw Enclosures 7 d / CIwC':iS~'iJ CI7Y OF RANCHO CUCHF70fJGA AD641fJi STRATTON Lauren Wasserman, City Clerk P~1AR ~ 7 1981_ City of Rancho Cucamonga AY PAI 9320 Baseline Road 7FS191~Ill11211121$E41$E6 Rancho Cucamonga, CA Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 9441 on February 25, 1981; Resolution No. 81-20 T0: LAUREN WASSERMAN, CITY CLERX, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLEP.SE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned, Mark III, pursuant to California Government Code Section 66452.5 and Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance Code Section 1.401.10 hereby appeals from the action of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga taken on February 25, 1981 conditionally approving Tentative Tract Map No. 9941. Specifically, the undersigned appeals the imposition of those conditions set forth in Resolution B1-20 Section 2 Item Numbers 2 and 3. Dated: March 6, 1981 MARK I, a C/a/1' ornif co or tion7~~ • B J es Golfos, i e President STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On this 6 day of March, 1981, before the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared James Golfos, known to me to be the Vice President of Mark III, a corporation, the corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. s ... ~~OifiCUt S[Al _._.____. F CRRMFN NI4FR I ~ NNary VuNhc . Ghsam, J ORfN4f CRUNit I NF Comrmssron Es <i M 1...__....._ ~" w 71, 19R3I [ ~ Notary Public in and for said County and State ~~ • ~.( ww e«•c es o~ ~~~ ~• - SURR SI HELLVER ... ,. _, - e , aca,~w.~c• Ir 6E,F 5E • $PN BERNAq pINOCCA LIFORrylA 42412 n ~ - S.v Or.Erv - March 9, 1981 Laurer, LJa sserman, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA cc^ _ _ n., use 4,~'- Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 11fi 09 on February 25,1981 Resolution No. 81-19 Deaz Mr. Wd59ermdn: • This office represents Bob Jensen Builders, Inc., the applicant with respect to Tentative Tract Map No. 11609. Enclosed is our client's appeal of the Planning Commission's conditional approval of Tentative Tract biap No. 11609 as expressed in Resolution No. 81-19 approved February 25, 1981. Also enclosed is our check in the amount of $100,00 payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga representing the required appeal fee pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 1.401.10. Please address all notices and other correspondence reyarding this appeal to: Surr 6 Rellyer (FJD) A Professional Corporation P. 0. Box 6086 San Bernardino, CA 92412 Tf you would like to discuss this matter prior to the hearing on the appeal we will be happy to do so. Very truly yours, • JDS/kw Enclosuro_s a~ SURR & fIELLYER A PROFESSIONAL COR .ATION By Ames D. Stroffe .~ Lauren Wasserman, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 11609 on February 25, 1981; Resolution 410. 81-19 TO: LAUREN WASSERM.AN, CITY CLERK, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIIGA PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned, Bob Jensen Builders, Inc., pursuant to California Government Code Section 66452.5 and Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance Code Section 1.401.10 hereby appeals from the action of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga taken on February 25, 1981 conditionally approving Tentative Tract Map 4'0. 11fi 09. Specifically, the undersigned appeals the imposition of those conditions set forth in Resolution 81-19 section 2 Item 4JUmber 2. Dated: March 10, 1981 BOB JENSE4] BUILDERS, INC., • a California corporati n By ~ ~ ~'.Yt.~_. obert C. Sense , resident STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On this /D+,day of March, 198]., before the undersigned, a Notary Public ir. and for said County and State, personally appeared Robert C. Jensen, known to me to be the Presir3ent of Bob Jensen Builders, Inc., a corporation, the corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IJITNESS my hand and offf~cial seal. , ~`~. ~`--- ~~ ~ r.~" "' ~,' /,j. I Notary PilLl;c ~n and o id ~_Cnunty and State ,~ '~'~' I~'~. ".i!1,, Ill.\'V. 'fq, .'~ l:1,1 ~~ '~L `u ar :~~ • I:. LA;•i), 1.:.il:'. 917B4 '~`\~j~~, •.i'~ ~ ~, f''. ~,........ ' ~'.... . •1' l l ~ ~R -.AS ./VVI vu r yr xruvi,nv wi.r~mvl~i,n GVCn,tirp~ MEMORANDUM ~~ ,~ ry~ > a. F_ March 12, 1981 ~ 1977 T0: City Manager Members of City Council FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager (~ SUBJECT: Mobile Nome Park Tenants' Request for a Public Hearing Regarding "Excessive Rent Hikes". As you will recall, over two years ago, the City Council and staff met with Mobile Home tenants and owners to "informally" resolve their differences with regard to increases in rents. Prior to these meetings, staff had surveyed similar mobile home parks in neighboring communities and found the rents to he quite competitive. As a result of the owners' meetings with the City Council and staff, Alta Laguna offered leases which would guarantee rents for one year periods. The initial rents offered were in the 8% to 10% range; how- ever rents currently offered in this lease program have increased to 12% and incensed iena nts. Staff has surveyed the other four parks and found rent increases varying from 10% to 15% being assessed against the tenants. Tenants consider these rent increases excessive and have retained an attorney to represent their interests: No. Of Rent Mobile Home Park Spaces Rent Vacancy Increases Aita Laguna 294 193 - 235 2 12% Alta Vista 185 150 - 198 0 15% Chapparel Hgts. 152 160 - 175 0 9% Pines 165 166 - 190 3 13% Romona Villa 149 176 - 190 0 i0% Although it is not known specifically what will be requested by the tenants, short of an ordinance Limiting rent increases, there are varf ous alter- natives currently being used by other cities to help resolve differences between tenants and owners. Continued...... 7 r Mobile Home Park Tenants' Request • for Public Hearing March 12, 1981 Page Two 1. Palm Borings - Rent Review Commission -The Palm Springs Ordinance was adopted by referendum and was opposed by staff and Council. The Ordinance creates an impartial "Rent Review Commission" whose proceedings are administrative and not mandatory. Further the Ordinance prohibits increases of rents in excess of (3/4) of the increase in the cost of living. The Ordfnance applys to all residential units located within the City renting at less thar, $450 per month. 2. Rent Control Boards - The Cities of VacavTll e, Rialto, Camarillo and many others have adopted impartial Rent Review Boards to mediate differences between tenants and residents. The Boards will mediate and make recommendations, but are generally advisory and have no mandatory authority. 3. Rent Mediation Boards - Similar to the Rent Control Boards is the Mediation Board adopted by Ordinance in the City of Chino, as well as other cities. The purpose of the Rent Mediation Board is to ~ provide an ob,iective but impartial forum to assist tenants and owners in arriving at a rent that is equitable to both. If tenants and owners cannot come to a mutual agreement after exhausting the • mediation process, the Board prepares an opinion to the City Council which is advisory but not mandatory. 4. Mobile Home Park Advisory Comm ttee -The City of Montclair has adopted a Mobile Home Park Advisory Committee which currently is advisory and not mandatory. Currently the City is considering utilizing an arbitrator if the decision by the Committee Ts unacceptable to the tenants and landlord. The Ma bile Home Park Advisory Committee would have the power to select an arbitrator to make a legal decision binding on the landlord and tenants. These options were developed by the Golden State Mobile Home Owners League (tenants organization). The City began con- sidering these options when a mobile home park owner refused to accept a rent increase proposed 6y the Advisory Committee. West End Mediation Board -Another option to consider would be to utilize the West End Mediation Board which is supported by Legal Ride and the Apartment gssoc~ the West End Mediation Board is staffed by trained Vista volunteer mediators to handle both apartment and mobile home park tenant complaints. Their Board reviews complaints on a reference basis and will mediate between owners and tenants if both volunteer to appear before the mediation board. The mediation process is in the hands of a "third party" without use of City Council and staff time which has obvious advantages and disadvantages. Continued..... ~~ n ~/ Mobile Home Park Tenants' Request for Public Hearing • March 12, 7981 Page Three Specifically in the West End, the only Cities who have implemented Advisory Mediation Boards regulating Mobile Home Park rents are the Cities of Chino and Montclair. In both cases, the Boards have not been in existence long enough to evaluate their effectiveness. The Cities of Ontario, Upland, Laverne and Fontana have not adopted Rent Control Advisory Boards. The preceding alternatives are being presented as informational items only. Staff would recommend that more time be committed to a review of the proposal from the tenants' represenative (Mr. White) as well as a more in depth review of the shove stated alternatives or any other the Council may wish to consider. For example, the City Council may wish to consider a review of the tenants' request by the the City's Advisory Commission to obtain a "grass roots" reaction to regulating rents in Mobile Home Parks. The next regular meeting of the Advisory Commission will be held on March 26, 1981. • ,IR/vz • ~~ .-. .~ ~~ ~: ~.: ~~c~E'c p z~~FE~ V 1°~~T= O l°. a •F~i _ tq z' ~ - 0 ~:~" - ~ s~d€ y°evV3 ~E~SEe µ~~yy o'aS cm F~1'~' i W~/ V hM '~Ay ~~ B ~E=3 +. ee~~ E E=~q 3 Vay°oY ". u` E: °Yy~B 03E °~°?y~~y~ ~ee3 m~ a°= ..=°u L^~^ ES°`'A Ear n° )ax_E° _ Sc ~agpS,w, 8°n~3 p vXrVU~° ed ~:°j: S~ °"u3~~ ,n ~: O 'Eaoe O p ..~' Gig: . `e ::E _~ M 9~€~ O _ C~53 ` ~ 5g ~'c ° o ~ ~.~3 L.~_~~9=° e1EaS ES +F~ry Lr ~y~ $~a ?`oe~a oS'g~LR `3 d: '- ~1 ~ E_ vEn"]YyK VuvcEp !>XS U ~ h ceg~Z u~~ Vo~o'A ~Ea` _ My ~ i~ LFY°" BPc°~i~ i0yn 3 J /~ LAw O~.iC [5 DOWNS, OeERG 8 WHITE as ..ownao c o cac Snw a[nc psW anon[ Lq VERN EO CALIi00.NIA 9V50 January 23, 1981 Loren Wasserman City Manager Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 9320 Aasel ine P.d. Alta Loma, California Re: Agenda 3/18/81 Dear Mr. Wasserman: nau coot ~~~ Re Please be advised that I represent the five mobile home parks* in your city which have secured a spot on the March 18, 1961 city council agenda. Dn behlaf of the tenants of these parks, I hope to address the council on the matter of excessive rent hikes within their parks. I am contacting you in this manner so that the mayor/chairperson will be aware of my representative status. At the meeting I will be prepared to speak concisely and briefly to my clients' concerns and contentions. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, DOWNS, OAE RG 6 WHITE ~ :~1,~~~>>- AY: STEPHEN A. WHITE SAW/ds *A1Ca Laguna, Alta Vista, Chapparel Heights, Pines, and Ramona Villa. • r~ L 35 _,! r L.C),d. i ~ . r ., _ ' ALL.~S 1~1LK _ r+oa~~EVO.E pgpn oEVewnnevT, p.ry.eE VEVT sirvvpsTXEn.s 9495 WiLSMipC BOU:.E VqR O. SViT[ JiD B EVER LV piL~S. Cs~lEOp ry•q 90212 iELE FrvONE 1213) 2)9-)134 hla rch 3, 1981 ,f`The Honorable Mayor Philip Schlosser The Honorable Councilman ,lames Frost The Honorable Councilman Michael A. Palombo The Honorable Councilman John Michael The Honorable Councilman Art Bridge City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mayor BchlosseY and Councilmen: This letter is being written for its information value preparatory to the March 18 Council Meeting as it pertains to the matter of housing in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. I am managing general partner of Alta Laguna Mobile Estates, Ltd., the partnership which owns the 294 space mobile home park located at 10210 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga. • Upon acquiring the park in 1976 we completely upgraded the recreation facilities, the streets and landscaping. We have also succeeded in pz~oviding a decent place in which to live for the residents at a price equivalent to alternative lifestyles be it single family housing, condominiums, apartment housiny or other mobilehome parks. The residents presently rent ground space for their own mobile homes together with common use of a variety of recreation facilities, including an extremely lar. ge clubhouse with billiard room, card room and kitchen facilities plus swimming and enclosed hot therapy pools and enclosed shuffleboard facility. We maintain fencing, the street system covering approximately 40 acres, sewer and water facilities, all common gas and electric facilities and extensive landscaping, including a small lake with fi.s h, all at no additional expense to the residents, or to Rancho Cucamonga taxpayers. Each resident pays a lump sum monthly charge under a month-to-month tenancy or, at the choice of such resident, under a two-year lease of his or her ground site. A substantial majority of the park have opted for [he two-year leases, which will terminate, unless renewed, either in December, 1961 with ten percent increases during the previous two years, or in December, 1982 with Len percent, during most of 1980, and twelve percent average increases thereafter. u 7 / The Honorable Mayor and Councilmen City of Rancho Cucamonga March 3, 1981 Page Two Residents will be paying approximately $200 per month during 1981. Our rents compare favorably with similar luxury mobilehome parks in San Bernardino County and are slightly below the rents of our parks in the eastern portion of Los Angeles County. Alta Laguna's facilities and level of maintenance makes it the finest mobilehome park within a 50 mile radius. If rent controls were enacted, or a rent review board is appointed with rent control powers, the majority of our park residents, who have already extended their leases to December, 1982, would be paying more than others of the park residents who have not yet extended their leases. This result would run counter to expectations of the first group of the park residents and, certainly, would not set well with these residents. In reflecting on the lifestyle enjoyed at this rent by our Rancho Cucamonga residents, it might be well to realize that the average coach has also appreciated 50 percent to 100 percent on resale if left in the park because of the factors enumerated above. The combination of rent and coach payment is typically $400 to $450 per month, giving the resident equity buildup, capital appreciation, a living density of 7 to 8 units to the acre, almost 1,500 square feet of housing together with recreational facilities, other amenities and numerous services provided and paid for at no additional expense. Consider, conversely, the plight of the average apartment dweller should. such comparisons be made. Incidentally, to cite just a few of our increased costs this past year, gas, electricity and trash disposal all increased in excess of 50&. A similar situation was handled by the City Council in Camarillo with the appointment of a rent review commission, to act as a voluntary mediation board. This was in lieu of enacting rent controls, although they may be called something else. I would hope the appointed commission can go beyond merely reviewing rents and get into the examination of ways to alleviate or subsidize resident hardship cases and to encourage development of additional local housing. Very tr,. iy yours, ~ All aJ~%~ ~~ AW/] • 37 '~ ~ ''~~~~~ Western Mobilehome Association A/c rch 3, 3931 Phillip Sch Zossen Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear ids uor Schlosser: As President of the Western Mobilehome Associ¢tior., I could like to provide some input to help in your deliber¢tian regarding c possible Rent Control Ordinance in Rancho Cueamong¢. Each council member is rightly concerned over the difficulties faced by the elderly, the poor and all people struggling to get by on fixed irzcomes at a time of rampaging inflation. The cost of food, eZa thing and shelter has reached alarming Zeve Zs. A bag of groceries costa three times the price just four years ago. Single family homes have doubled, tripled • and even quadrupled in price in four years. Rents have gone up too, but have Zagged a substantial distance behind tYtc increase in the Ca nsumer Price Index and particularly the increased cost of single family homes. In fact, the failure of rents to keep pace over the years czi th inflation is a major cause of today ra apartment and mobilehome shortage. Investors are not attracted to the Zo~u return tin investments. Why then are rents singled out for can tra Z? 1, Because they are the easiest prices to regulate at the local Level. 2. Lccat government seems to feel that the landlords have invited controls because of the me¢ger response to an invitation to shave Proposition I3 tax savings with tenants. I 1 u .~ 172i 8th Slr«4 5ui1< 479 • Sunm nlo, CA 95011 • (916) 4448047 4741 Birth Street, Suite 707 • Newport Beach, CA 97660 • (71q 5198646 Page two Few consider the fact that the taz reduction provided many ~a+.^.cra with a decent return for the first time in years. The hue and cry over scattered rent increases in the wake of 13 panicked most owners into retrenchment thereby aborting possible sh¢ring of tax savings. Yau k>:ow all this, yet we are nevertheless considering rent control out of a sense that something must be done to ease the burden of Zow-income people. But if housing shortage is the problem, is rent control the answer? I know it is easy to rationalize rent regulations by saying it is only tempo rare until we can find ways to promote more housing. But it is seldom temporary and it is never a solo tie n. If you believe that is a questionable conclusion, Let me give you some excerpts from some seriaua commentators: In October, 1977, a report on rent con trot prepared by the staff of the U.S.C. Center for • tho Study of Financial Institutions had this to say: "In c housing environment characterized by insufficient supply, the Last thing a policy should do is to reduce the levels of housing services offered, yet that is the clear impact of rent controls--even second generation controls. rr "B;y reducing turnover, rent controls can be expe r_ted to perpetuate naci¢2 and age daaerim ins tion and to frustrate efforts to achieve equal housing." "The 6e Lief that the housing prob Zsm can be reduced throunh ¢ policy of rent control i:= a fa Lse hops." ... 1_'~'+mu Cnrtc r, Economic ve~ort o° the Fr¢sideY ti ., nu~¢r] 137!+; • v ~~ I ~ i i ~ l I . I I Paoe three "New starts of multifamily units Zast year came to 535,000 up 43n from ]976.. the Northeast was an exception as out- migration and the prevalence of rent controls have curbed expansion." 3. Or. Michael L. Penzer, Federal Xome Loan Bank of San Prancisco, in July 1977, addressed the rent control issue in CaZifarnirz as fa ZZows: "Mortgage lenders are reluet¢nt to make new loans on rent-controlled propertie a, since there is an incre¢sed risk of default in such loans. Investors are also aware of the risks involved and may be Zess willing to approach lenders for loans an such properties. As a result, areas without rent contro la may become more attractive to prospective investors in new rental housing, and economic growth would occur • there." 4. A study of the United States Sen¢te Committee on Benking, Xousinq and Urban Affairs Zed to the following conclusion an May 17, 1976; "Interesting Zy enough, there is no evidence to show that rent control benefits the poor. Quite tits contrary, it helps the small, privileged group of long-time residents, largely middle class, while driving up rents in uncontrolled units." 5. Ascar Ltindbeek, Professor of Economics, Stockholm, m¢de the following statement: "In many cases, rent control anpeara to be the most ef~°tictient technique presen tly known to destroy a city -- except for bombing." J, S^an By dcnfelt, Professor of economics, University ,o,' Lund, Sweden, stated: "It is well known and dacumen ted that rent contrn la nesnlt in poor maintenance, fewer - renova tin na and modernizations and, therefore, • in the to n5 run in a serious deterioration in !~ Page four the quality of dweliings. Because some requests for rent increases have been granted the defenders of rent control have persistently contended that deterioration and slum deveZovment have not occurred." This argument i5 f6llaCiOllS." "Rent control breeds slums." "AS a result of control and lower rental income, owners' ability to maintain their apartment houses declined. Zn particular, their incentive for such upkeep which is motivated by an aesthetic or comfort point of view has dwindled." The Mayor's Committee on Rent Control submitted its report to Mayor Xevin White of Boston ir. September, 1977, with the following findings: "The Committee found that administering Went • control has proven to be mare complicated than originally anticipated. Landlords artd tenants found procedures cumbersome and confusing, and the Rent Control Administration was swamped with case-by-case review of requests for rent increases, evictions, and vacancy deecntrol petitions." "She Committee also found that rent control had adversely affected the City's housing stock. ldany Zo ng-term, reponsibZe landlords, perceiving controls as a threat to the profti lability of the it inueatments, cut corners on maintenance; other Landlords sold their property to new owners interested prima ri Zy in speculative short-term gcinx, and others limp Z;7 waZkad away from their property." ";iyar, reduced domand far units, in r. reas rd :car iunmcnt ind deferred .main to rta nee of oropertie s_, tt n.; Com•wi ttee ruasticned whuthcr the continua tion u' rcnc dr. +;Lrol rras core: is^, tent wi tic other colic i. e. r, ai;r: a ri nr:;serva the oitu 'a heusi. rov strek and to {rtauro brat low ~z nd modem to tiny, ome households • 1~ • Faa2 five 1 ~ I 'i i i ~I ~ I i ~ have access to decent and affordable Zivina accommada ti.o ns. The continuation of rent control as it is currently administered may, in the Zong run, reduce the quality and quantity of units available to Zaw and to moderate income families." 8. Sheldon Xa tz, Chairman, Rent Stabilization Association, Znc., New York, stated: "At a time when government should be trying to attract new investments and expand the housing market, by imposing "temporary controls" they are in effect worsening the situation in their city." "Rent controls have never resuZt¢d in any more housing or new investments. Therefore, it should be interpreted as a warning signal that the community leaders have not been responsible • enough to the housing needs of their area." 9. Roger Starr, former head of New York City's Xausing and Development Administration, declares: "Rent control discourages investment in older housing, hastens the Bete rx:o ra tion of existing buildings and keeps the supply permanently inadequate." ]D. United St¢tes Senator Thomas F. Eagleton stated in an article appearing in the August 1977 Reader's Dillest: "Tfiroug hout my po L~i tical career Z have worked to promote decent housing for poor and elder Zy Americans. Cppoaition to rent control is consistent with th i.s Record. The Washington Star put it best by comparing such controls to hard drugs; 'Starting is euphorx:c. Try i>g to stop Zr, painful. continuing is disaster'." IL Ln an article entitled "The Renter's Backlash," Lhe October Iq, 1378, edi tLan gf Th¢ Wall Streut Jcurnal had Luis to sap: • "The tax brea Y,e b,l pressure for 'nigher rents, inetudirt,q a ve r;7 tight ren taZ market and the rna rgi na 7. econom i,: i~aal tit of smaller apcr tment L~ L Page six buildings. Mortgage officers in Los Angeles report that many of the buildings with fewer than 40 units have had zero or negative cash flows, far from repealing these pressures, the City Co unciZ's rent freeze will harden and preserve them. "Los Angeles will earn the rent control lessors the hard way. Construction will plummet, buildings will decay and the true upper pnessure on rents will only intensify. ""*Marginal landlords cut corners on maintenance, fall behind on their tales and finally walk away from the bui Zdinga. California will be facing an upsurge of abandonments, the rental market will stay as tight as ever." "Buz by that time, cnyone who could conceiv- ably buy his own home will have dotte sa. There will 6e a glaring ecntrast between the prosperous • market in private homes and the controlled, decaying mcrket in rental hauling. Unfortunately, the main victims of this object Zeasan will be Low-income city renters, the very people these rent controls are presumably meant to he Zp." 12. A Ee bruary 5, 1979, newspaper article quoted Dr. Richard V. Eastin, Associate Professor, University of Southern California, as stating: "Rent control is nothing more than another hidden tax -- a tae on landlords. It would be uncharitable to claim that government officials ~u ho impose rent ceiling intend to have a detrimen tat impact on an already serious housing condition." rrye t, that is exactly what the rent control taxing scheme can be expected to do." 13. E'irtalty, WiZZtiam W. Drown, an Economics Professor rrt C~:ZZfarnia State Universi tg, sa;/s that: "Tire flirts tiort with rent control in uartious ~;alifornia pities and municipalities seems to iitd ien to a nursed ineLZna Lion to repeat the error.^, • Y1 /. {1 V Page seven of others and strike another hlow for eoZZec tive silliness ... In city after city with rent control, the symptoms are always the same: Persistent shortages, deteriorating apartments, ¢nd high abandonment rates." • This parcde of horribtes could be expanded indefinitelu. Suffice it to say that rent control, wherever it has landed, hes destroyed the incentive for new development and aggravated the hcusing shortage, the very problem it seeks to cure. Some believe that a 7% annual increase in rents available to landlords will avoid the oppressive effects of rent regula tiona tried elsewhere. This, too, is wishful thinking. Provisions of this nature have been tried elsewhere without susses s. As was stated in the report by the U.S.C. Cerzter far Study of Financial Institutions: "In shot t, the spite of cost pass through provisions, minimum maintenance standards, and other so called modern adjustments to rent control ordinances, they remain an ineffieien t, imprecise, and sometimes perverse policy to accomp Zish a goal of income rediavribution." Again, we all acknowledge we have ¢ problem, a housing shortage. Sut Z ask again, is rent control the solution? Perhaps I should Zat Senator William Proxmtier ¢nswer this in iris address from the j'Zoor of the Senate when he stated Zast Sep temben; "There are many reasons for this (the housing problem), 14r. President, but a major reason is in two seductive words: Rent Control h¢s the most obvious kind of political appea L. There are more tenants than landlords Every tenant likes to have his rent held down. 1o to rant wants to have his rent increased. So the po ZiticaL arithmetic is atrainht forward and deadlu. Fix rents by Za w. What could be simpler. The only trouble with that solution, as Roger Starr points out, is that it does rat work." • T%ie onlp of°ec tive wa;~ to solve the problem requires the c rn d;w tcor~ of mots una ts. If the impcct of Pronosition 13 lu .r Zlowed to run Zts course, development will be stimuto red '+ attrm; ring invcstnrs, whtici, is after all, the Council's ultimo :.+ loaf.. The into rim relief for tenants in financial ,.iistrn, r,s ;s to 6e found in rent subsidy, not rent regulations. µ LE. ,i (~, ~~ ~, Paoe eight Z have also enclosed a copy of a Christian Science Monitor article relating to Rent Control. Sincerely, ~ , G~~~ _ . ~ti c2~ Alan Tarlov President Western Mobile home Association AJT:JFX: Zss encZo sure ce: James Frost, Councilman Jcn Mikels, Councilman Michael Palombo, Councilman Art Bridge, Councilman • • • ;~ ~`aga^•.`•"~3R °~G~ac~~eak3ezyo~n~e'".~Q~s,a r C°3~ '23Zb o. e°:~___xfE ''-3n 3=`,cc -,3~^ Q%> >~:ep~_15 'n ~'" =_ e9 cK3soSF~ _ ^ `a _ _ o 3 m ' _ _'3S is^ ~' SGT°a _'A' ,~+, 7 `- R~` . _ a ea ,~ eo :_.-`R' _ _~;,1 _ _-_ ___ 'ran 2.~ _ 3~ 3 N AEinn ~~iv°v _ ;• 'e 5? ~ ~~A4 '~. ~a o Gam- .- - ~ _ i~ ~~= - ~_--~: =Sn __ ?n_'n_ -- ___ _ _ oA~~3' --Y^fa _ _Ci.fo - _ .,o ~~c'„~a ., _. °v~ as o~ f~ Az7aF ai ^_ .1'^°.-. `I~ ('aJ+ ~tt rJ [~' Cp;~J~ C'J `~En -ni.e e- ~ ~noL~}~~Yn rr;J f n i f ~ \'.~ K' 93°- --- io_ -- c~R~ - ~ ~ `?~4°y_ - _ i ~~ _ - Slnu ' ;iti=i iii;; iiiiii;u;;r l i ~ ~ .• ~^Illlllllllll,lllllllli ' ~ :.u uIJII P II n s i ~ = j .• . Tlu ur:unrlrPr o5 ~ D r.II~• .. .r ~ ~-- ii __.l H G+ STAFF~R~PORT~ GATE: March 4, 1981 T0: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM BACKGROUND: The Planning staff, for the past several years, has been working on the development of a comprehensive code program. The City Council in past actions has adopted an ordinance and resolution author- izing and specifying City personnel to issue citations on City ordinance violations. Since the adoption of that ordinance, staff has been working on the implementation of the Citation program. Recently, staff was suc- cessful in obtaining approval from the courts of fines for various code violations. We have established a warning citation (entailing no spe- cific fine) and a final citation which would require court appearance and potential fines. • ti`. As in most citation programs, in order to encourage violators to appear at the court hearing, a statement isadded to the citation which states, "Willful failure to appear on this citation shall constitute a separate violation for Which the violator may be punished by 6 months in jail and/or $500 fine." We believe that this addition is necessary in order to create a strong citation program. Please find attached, a copy of a proposed ordinance which establishes the penalty for willful failure to appear on a citation issued for a violation of a City code, and, if adopted, will be printed on the reverse side of the citation. In addition to the attached ordinance, please find attached an amended resolution specifying the employees authorized to issue citations, The list as provided in the resolution is the same as was previously adopted by the City Council with the exception of the addition of Claudia Monahan, Business License Inspector. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing to consider any input on this matter. Upon due considers Lion of the item, and if the Council concurs with the proposal, then adoption of the attached Ordinance and Resolution would be appropriate. Re pec tfu~~~ mitted, arry,K. H Ci ty~plann B H:MV:jk Attachments: Ordinance and Resolution ~~ ORDINANCE NO. 139 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORMA, ESTABLISHING A GENERAL PENALTY PROVISION FOR WILLFUL FAILURE TO APPEAR AS IND ICRTED ON A CTTATION ISSUED FOR VIOLATIONS OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Willful failure to appear as promised, or indicated on a citation issued for violation of any City Ordinance, shall constitute a separate violation for which the violation may be punished by six (6) months in jail and/or five hundred ($500) dollar fine, regardless of the disposition of the original charge. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Da, i1Y Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • PASSED, APPROVED, and RDOPTEO this day of , 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phi ip D. Scho sser, Mayor gTTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk N~ r~m,r M n A nV9_V\ M Y`A AKIAV^_A fl'C!~M()~ STAFF REPORT <~V ~'; r C - O H ~ Z U > March 13, 1981 Ian ) T0: City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Assistant City Managerl~ RE: Request to Consider Proposed Modifications to the Qnnitrans Routes to Meet the S8 62D Requirements and Improve the Efficiency of the Transit System in Rancho Cucamonga • As you are already aware, Senate Bill 620 requires that the Omni trans Transit system meet the requirement of an 80%/20% Fare Box ratio of revenues. In order to facilitate this requirement, the Qnnitrans Board approved minimal fare increases and directed pnnitrans staff to work with Cities to help formulate more productive routes and analyze the recommended route proposed in the system wide Compre- hensive Operational Analysis Study completed last year. Since then City Staff, Councilman Mikels, the City's Advisory Conmiss ion and Omnitrans staff have been analyzing alternative routes to meet the SB 620 requirements and in general~to develop a more productive system of routes in Rancho Cucamonga. The attached map and documentation outline the current routes and proposed routes as well as the corresponding decrease in miles and costs if these routes are adopted by Council. It is staff's opinion that the proposed route, which retains much of the current route in Alta Loma and Cucamonga and expands service to the western portion of Cucamonga, provides a better network of service in the City, while at the same time reducing the total number of miles driven. In summary, these are the recommended alters [ions to the current level of service for Routes 50 (Alta Loma, Cucamonga) and Route 60 (Lhaffey College). 1. Route 50 Alta Loma - Cucamonga) Retain much of the current Route 50 with expansion to the western edge of Cucamonga and eliminating service on Baself ne and adding Continued..... 49 Proposed Modification to Gmni trans Routes Page Two March 13, 1981 service on Foothill Boulevard. The Chaffey College route currently has two way service on Baseline. These modifications would, in staff's opinion, improve the level of service in the City, remove unproductive stops and reduce the total miles of the current routing from 14.45 miles to 11.60 miles. The C.O.A. report and Omnitrans staff have also recommended that service on Route 50 be provided only at peak hours in the morning and afternoon, thus further reducing the miles driven. Staff, however would request that Council direct staff to study this recommends Lion and evaluate what hours of operation would be appropriate while at the same time attempting to meet the S.B. 620 requirements. Staff would also recommend that based on the ridership surveys and Fare Box Revenue data, that Fixed Route Sunday service be eliminated. Those who need service on Sunday would stilt have access to OTaI-a-Ride. Omnitrans staff had originally recommended elimination of Saturday and Sunday Fixed Route Service which the Ci?y may have to deal with at a Later date. l J 2. Route 60 (Chaffey College Route) The C.O.A. and Omni trans staff have recommended no changes to the • existing route but orginally recommended increasing the frequency of service from 40 minute service to 30 minute service. Given the constraints of SB 620 and the substantial increase in cost ($50,000 + per year), staff would recommend that Route 60 remain at 40 minute service. Omnitrans staff had also recommended reducing the hours of operation of Route 60 during non peak periods. Again staff would like more time to evaluate the appropriate hours of operation. Staff will also have to consider what hours of operation are being recommended for Route 60 in Montclair and Upland. 3. Dial-A-Ride Neither City Staff, Omni trans staff or the C.O.A. report recommended any modifications to the City's Dial-A-Ride service, Our current Dial-A-Ride service is proof ded from 9 - 6, Monday thru Friday; one vehicle 9-5 Saturdays and Sundays. Service is provided to the general public as well as seniors and handicapped. Same of the more densely populated cities are recommending restricting Dial-A-Ride to the eiderly and handicapped. However, unlike Rancho Cucamonga, these recommendations are being made in more densely populated cities where most of the citizens have access to a fixed route. Continued...... • So Proposed Modifications to Omnitrans Routes Page Three • March 13, 1961 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Route 50: Adopt Route 50 as proposed and implement service July, 1981. Provide 60 minute service on Route 50 and direct staff to evaluate the recommended hours of operation and bring back to the City Council for their consideration. 2. Route 60: P,etain current route and current 40 minute frequency of service and implement July, 1981. Direct staff to evaluate appropriate hours of operation and bring back to the City Council for their consideration. 3. Dial-A-Ride: Retain existing level of service of one vehicle, 9~, Monday thru Friday and one vehicle 9 - 5 Saturdays and Sundays. 4. Direct staff to periodically evaluate and report to the City Council the ridership and fare box return for Route 50, Route 60 and Oial-A-Ride during the next fiscal year. JR/vz Enclosure [ J s~ • OMNITRANS C~N~ aiC°'~'~N~'d ~` H ROUTE 50~AkaFA-66h~A,~6N6RM9N(3A-' ~Q~ PRESENT s D a --. z } m I r Z TRANSFER TO ROUTE 60 CHAFFEY TRANSFER TO COLLEGE ROBERDS ROUTE BO ~D ® ~ MONCLAIR PLA2~ I v H s H ~ ~-• BASE LINE _ ~ • PALO ALTO 1 1 MAP LEGEND f~ HOSPITALS SHOPPING CENTERS Q SCHOOLS E•ELEMENTARY J•JR. HI M•NIGH ~ OTHER POINTS OF INTERE ST U TRANSFER TO flOUTE 14 i 1 WKD SAT SUN SERVICE HOURS 620A-820P 820A-820P 920A-520P FREQUENCY 60 60 80 j~ OMNITRANS ROUTE So 'PRO'POSED LEMON wKn 5ar 9uw etRAI1CE NDUP1 FREpuENCy 60 60 53 • • • • OMNITRANS N ~ ROUTE 60-CHAFFEY COLLEGE /4~ PROPOSED-NO CHANGEIN ROUTE 6 CHAFFEY COLLEGE MAP LEGEND I~NOSPITAL3 ~ al ® SHOPPING CENTERS ml TRANSFER TO CI O OTHER POINTS ROUTE 70 ~Zi® OF INTERE ST • TRANSFER TO RTS. 81,86,70 OPO- ~_PO~~n > ARROW CITT O ARROW ROUTE HALL MO NT CL AIR PLAZA TRANSFER TO RTS. 61,60,fi 5,66,67,68,69 WKD SAT SUN SERVICE HOURS 600A-630P 600A- 800P 900A-600P FREQUENCY l~ 40 4e sy CURRENT SERVICE Round trip miles 14.45 • Daily trips - Monday th ru Saturday 14 Sunday trips B Annual trips 3,98fi Annual revenue miles 57,598 COA PROPOSAL Round trip miles 14.70 Daily trips - Monday th ru Saturday 14 Sunday trips 8 Annual trips 3,986 Annual revenue miles 58,594 STUDY REQUEST - RANCHO CUCAMONGA Round trip miles 11.60 Daily trips - Monday th ru Saturday 14 Sunday trips B • Annual trips 3,986 Annual revenue miles 46,238 SPUR TO SAN ANTONIO HOBPITAL Round trip miles 2,70 Annual trips 3,986 Annual revenue miles 10,762 • Sr ROUTE 50 ALTA LOMA - CUCAMONGA • Peak Nours Only On Weekdavs - Eliminate Saturday s Sunday Service 6:45 A.M. to 8:20 A.M. - 1 hr. 35 min. 1:45 P.M. to 4:40 P.M. - 2 hrs. 55 min. 4 hrs. 30 min. Savings Weekdays - 10.33 hrs. Saturday - 13.33 hrs. Sunday - 8.00 hrs. Annual Savings - $75,560 Annual Passenger Loss - 17,341 Annual Revenue Loss - $5,376 Net Savings Last Quarter - $17,546 Current Operat inq Ratio • Monday-Friday - .0843 Saturday - .0513 Sunday - .0397 • Last Quarter - $18,890 Last 4uarter - 4,335 Last Quarter - $ 1,344 S~ ROUTE 60 CHAFFEY COLLEGE Monday-Saturday Eliminat_ service from 5:55 A.M. to 7:00 A.M. Eliminatz service from 7:50 P,M. to 5:40 P.M. Sunday F.l iminate service from 9:00 A.M. to 10:20 A.M. Sayincs Weekday - 2.33 hrs. S aturdav - 2.33 hrs. Sunday - 2.00 hrs. Annual Savings - 516,348 Anneal Passzn5er Loss - 52 Annual P.e venue Loss - $13 Last Quarter - 54,097 Last Quarter - 13 Last 4uarter - $ 4 • .• het Savi.^. cs Last Quarter - $4,093 Cu r:znt Ooeratinq Ratio t9ezW3ay - .1715 Saturday - n/a Sunday - .0756 • 7 CITY OF RA[~C1-10 CL'G~MO!~A STAFF REPORT • •I ,1 T0: Members of the City Council, and City Manager DATE: March 18, 1981 FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-12 - BARMAKIAN - A request for a change of zone from A-1-5, limited agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size) to R-1-20,000 (single family residential, 20,000 square foot minimum lot size) for 24.36 acres of land, located on the north side. of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN 1061-171-02. RELATED ITEM: Tentative Tract No. 10277. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission, at i,ts meeting of February 25, 1981, held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above-described project. Upon completion of the hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 (Commissioner King abstaining due to a conflict of interest), to recommend approval of the change of zone from A-1-5 to R-1-20>000. No opposition to the zone change was heard at this meeting. BACKGRDUND: The zone change to R-1-20,000 is being requested for development of a custom single family subdivision consisting of 30 lots on 24.36 acres of land. The proposed development and zone change is consistent with the Interim and Proposed General Plans and meets all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and adopted City standards. The Planning Commission has approved Tentative Tract No. 10277, subject to Council approval of this zone change (See attached map). Attached for review and consideration is the Planning Commission Staff Report, Environmental Assessment, and the Planning Commission Resolution. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Zone Change No. 80-12, and adopt the attached Ordinance. Re;ylgctful~Ty. ;ubmi tted, BKN:kp Attachments: Planning Commfssion Staff Report of February 25, 1981 Subdivision Map for Tentative Tract No. 10277 Planning Commission Staff Report for Tentative Tract No. 10277 Ordinance ~~ CITY OF RAI~CI-10 Cl,'CA~GA STAFF REPORT • GATE: February 25, 1981 T0: Planning Commission FP.OP1: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senier Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROiIMENTAL ASSESSMENT APID ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-12 - BARHAKIAN A request for a change of zone from A-1-5 limited agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size) to R-1-20 (single family residen tf al, 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) for 24.36 acres of land lecated on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN 1061-171-02 RELATED ITEP1: Tentative Tract No. 10277 BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a change of zone from A-1-5 limited agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size) to R-1-20 (single family residential, 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size) for 24.36 acres of land located on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street (Exhibit "A"). The applicant intends to develop a large lot single family residential tract on this site. Also appearing on this agenda are the precise plans and tentative tract map for the subdivision of this land in accordance with the R-1-20 zone regulations. The site fs presently undeveloped and contains some citrus groves and Eucalyptus trees. The topography slopes in a south/easterly direction at approxi- mately a lOt' grade. The Interim and Proposed General Plans designate the project site as very low residential uses at less than 2 dwelling units per acre. The surrounding land use and zoning is as follows: LANG USE ZON IDIG North Vacant, hillside area A-1-5 South Low density residential uses R-1-20 East Vacant, hillside area R-I-20 West Vacant, hillside area and low R-1-20 densf ty residential uses f~ ANALYSIS: The zone change request is consistent with the Interim and Proposed General Plans and the applicant's intentions for development will to nfo rm to the request zone designation. The requested zone designation is consistent and similar to surrounding zoning and develop- ment. In accordance with past Commission policy, this request for the zone change can be reviewed concurrently with the actual tract map and development plans for the project site. The tract map, which is more fully described within the tract map Staff Report, is consistent with the development standards and philosophies of the proposed zone, R-1-20. ~7 ITEN F Zone Change No. 80-12 -2- February 25, 1981 • Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has conducted a field investigation and has not found any signifi- cant adverse impacts upon the environment as a result of this zone change. Therefore, if the Commission concurs wf th such findings then recommendation for issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council would be appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was placed in the newspaper advertising this item as a public hearing. In addition, approximately 25 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. To date, no written or oral communications have been received regarding this project. RECOF!4ENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commf ssion conduct a public hearing to consider public input on the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings of the Staff Report, then it would be appropriate to adopt the attached Resolution which recommends approval of the zone change to the City Council. • Respectfully submitted, ner BKH:MV:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Part I - Initial Study Resolution of Approval • RESOLUTION N0. 81-16 • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE N0. 80-12 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM A-1-5 TO R-1-20 FOR 24.36 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALMOND, EAST OF CARNELIAN. WHEREAS, on the 28th day of August> 1980, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and • 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTIGN 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on February 25, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of February, 1981, Zone Change No. 80-12. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 80-12. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Councii. APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1981. PLANNING C014MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON GA • I aesolution No. 81-16 Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Comni ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do herehy certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comni ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of February, 1981 by the following vote to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Tolstoy, Daht Rempel None King • • • C~cl~ KOR't'N • CITY OF R:1~CI-IC- CL'G1~I0\G~1 1'L,\`~`I\G Dl\'ISI(~\' ITr:\I: ~a~1E CNflIJ~;~ Alo 4~D-12 TITLC. -~.QGQYID~I ~~~' L\IIIRIT __~_SG\LG~ ~~ ~ ~ ~3 r. ~ ~ ...i. CITY OP R(WCNO CNCAMONGA ~^ INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant ' Enviro:urental Assessment Review Fee: 570.00 For all projects recviring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this , application, the Environmental Analysis ataif will pre oa re part II Of the Initial Study. The Development Review Coamitt ee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will makes one of three, determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Nagative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3)~An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract No. 10277 APPLZC1hT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Barmakian-Wolff fi Associates, 9375 A NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING TfIIS PROJECT:Linville-Sanderson.-Hc: rn E Assoc., 9587 Arrow Route, Suite H, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 714/980-1211 IpG'1T ION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS A:.'7i ASSESSOR PARCEL ISO.) t:e nth __.._ cf i~Lr. on.'. ~:reet _._. ._ _~`_ .. .;•:e ._ C:tv of P~nci:o Cunamon¢a. As>es=:r Par^=1 ;b. 175!-LT+-02 LIST OTHER PERb!LTS NECESSARY FROM LOCrI L, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERi~L AGE;iCICS At7D Tf~ AGENCY ISSUI:iG SUCH PERt4ITS: I-I ~^ • ~ ( ~^ PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROSECT~ A proposed 30 lat custom subdivision for single family duellin es. Lar^= lots (nve~ ~n non ~~,~a re feet) on proposed R-1-2D zoning. Pro i_ect to be divided into four phases. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED SUILDiP]GS, IF ANY: 24.36 acres DESCRI&E THE EANZROL^' >TfAL SETTI`IG OF THE PROJECT SITE INC LURING LNFO Ri4ATI0N ON TO FOGRA PHY, PLAT+TS (TREES), ANI61AL5, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCE*iIC ASPECT'S, USE OF SURROtATDING PROPERTIES, AL'D THE DESCRIPT ZON OF Ab7 • EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Site if partially covered bv_citrus and_eucalyotus_t~ees.- Gopher, rabbit, lizards, grc and squirrels, and birds are s rerly sac to an exist ste rlv at a anyon, wnile the remainder imately 10~ towards the sa to is traversed by two nor Proxima [ely 332 feet east le the other is alone the line. n canyons ~aester Y Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? Thi; nroi~ct is divided into Four phis=; with a toinl of 30 lota. E'ir~t pha ;e contain; A LoC ;. --v---.~.~~_.-..____..._ .._-. _.. .. ..._._. _ .": J.. .. _ _ 1. ~ WILL T}IIS PROJECT: YES NO _ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? • X 3_ Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)'. • ~ 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?150 Aoo rc _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? I MPJ RTANT: If the project involves the construction of ~-- ,. residential units, complete the form on the ~~ . next page. .. CERTIPICAT IO N: I hereby certify that the statements furnishe< above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, .a nd information presented are true and correct:.to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be subait:ed before an adequate evaulatio n-can 6~~ '!by th~evt oc .ent Revi e•,u Committee. _ (\- 1 ~'t. ~]I_~~^~ (2 ,narc rmLa 'tan Date+~ -- Y. - / Signature l.r~ r{- ,. ct ~ \_~ t t- ~h Title /Z ~ Explanation o£ any YES answers above: RESIDE`]TIAL CONSTCUCTION ., The follo:iinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga ' Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. V'~, (~ [~o. 1027 Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No I.: ~(n~,~-(:./[~~'~-~'7'C7S=x:'~. . Specific Location of Project: ~--:a~F~Je.61'e~1~ -4Ly AIpL/~';~. PHASE I PiL`.SE 2 PHASE 3 PHASF. 4 TCTAL 1. Number of single family units: R ~ 5 5 30 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Uate proposed to I-~,~-~ ,~ 1~ pI ( - ~/~ ~ ~2 . begir. construction: ~1„ G '4~~J 4. Earliest date of ^ J //ff Jr 2 r occupancy: ~--I~~1` 4 !~~ `~i' I:JG J ~ "I~i Nodrl $ and ~ of Tentative 5.'~ Bedrooms Price Ranae 4' I ' ~C'O d~Y~aY~ -~ ~I 3Y~ Z;'h ~~ . • ~I- ICI ~'~ LL`s ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~: 5 $S~ i~~3 d~~r~ ~,~ ro ~ 4 p-!~ P~ I- 4 • . --'...------ ~7 8 e ~_ ` a ~ ; ,aY a ?~•~~" $ yi+ 8 ~` ~ ~Z~ 3 ~ C~ ~~ ~ ;~. ~ ! 3 ~ !3 ; ~ x r 7 .F. .i ~ _ 9,a ?a? e ' e,°x^ Qa ? .~:.~ ~~ ' ~ i3 g° ~ 233 ~' ,~ S $g~3 !o}~? ppk•33 33. };+' ~iFoF~ ~i.99'2 j4 '.ip{dpx"-, ~ = i ~ ~ Qt~i ii3..9 ~~i3 i3a3€: i~~y ~~3 ~:~` ~BiE ~~. ;~ y$3f k ~ ~~ d9 a :e~. ~3ti2 ' ~~:~ ~ i ~a@i3 gi 3 8 i ~ ~ 4 S ~ ° . ..::, ~:.. .P':~y_vv~.r'tiJ..ir.:r_::L~...,lwM;. y.I.:~~.:.n .l ® -~ - _- ... i~ ~~jd ;,1 1aa: 1 `+~' ~ J w.~•~ ~~ t \ .C ~ "cv-'!cam 1• __ J~ <~ ~i , i, ~ aF I ¢ '1 ~ e- - E ~ ';aParg ;~'~` ~,''Z~, (a~ ~ f,al' Kai .i." S ~T~( / ~ ..~.~ ~.~~. _ _~. ~~. „u~'. '... ,]r .a ; ~' W m :~ SIAFFVREPORT,v., r' GATE: February 26, 1981 T0: Planning Commission FR021: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Yairi n, Senior Planner SUBJECT: EPIVI RONMENTAL_ASS ESSMENT FOR TENTATi VE TRACT N0. 10277 BARF!AKIAN - q custom lot subd vision consisting of 30 lots on 24.36 acres of Land in the A-1-6 zone located on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN 1061-111-02 R'cLATED IT EFI: Zone Change No. 80-12 BACKGROU~?10: Barma kian-Wolff 8 Associates are requesting review and app ro vai for the development of a custom lot subdf vision on 24.36 acres of land located on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street (Exhibit A). The subdivision proposes to provide 30 single family lots ranging in size from 23,000 square feet to 36,000 square feet. The applicant's intent is to develop a custom lot subdivision of large homes within a totally secured community, including a guard house and gate. - - The site is presently zoned A-1-6 (limited agricultural) and a zone change to R-1-20 is pending Commission approval. The site is presently undeveloped and contains some citrus groves and several stands of Eucalyptus. property to the north, east, and west are of a similar character while south and farther west the area is developed with residential development similar to the density proposed within this development. The Interim and Proposed General Plan indicate very low residential as less than two units per acre. The Growth Management Review Committee has reviewed this tract in ac- cordance with the Growth Management Ordinance and the project has met the threshold point limit, thus allowing the Planning Comntissfon to consider approval o f this project. ' A'IALVSIS: The tract map, as shown on Exhibit "B", has been prepared in accordance with the State Subdivision ?lap .Act and the City Subdivision Ordinance. Access to the tract is being provided by the extension of Ai nmond Street, which loops into the project site and continues through the site with an interior public street system. The street design allows further extension of the street to the north for development of that (L ITEM E ~.y C TT 10277 -8- February 25, 1981 • REC07iMENDATiON: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input an this project. If, after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions recommended by Staff, then adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions would 6e appropriate. Respectfull ~ubmitted, ii ~ .' /~ 6ARRY K. MOGAN J ~Ci ty„Planner BKH:t1V:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Location Map Exhibit "8" - Tentative Tract Map Exhi6i ti "C" - Conceptual Site Plan C Exhibit "D" - Preliminary Grading Plan • Exhibit "E" - Drainage Plan Part I of the Initial Study Resolution of Approval Conditions of Approval r1 lJ 7~ 0 N ^'~ ~ 1 H :~ • ~C _ .~ G G -- ~ a ~~ .~ ~ ; _ ~ n e° ti ~ cE ~_ -a -1r^w~rrmm u ~- ~, .~ ~ ~. _. ,Ly _` "' , ;'~': 4 ~' ~~ 3g E ~s i~ 3 s~, zz ~ € pia a ~ ~~ ;~ ; ~~ i .a - ~r eta °a E[ ? ~ : ~ 1 3~~' .~ ~ ' ~ i ~: d ' z r?;; EtE € z } ~ ' a+•°' _:33 ~i3~g ~q~s ~I` ~:~ ii8x '.E~ iY ~$i~~ ~ i ~;~ ~3 ~ ^e~A ~~~~~ ~~~ ~<i ~~~~z i 3 c 3? 3~ 4 i F~ ~ o Y~ .. ~. ~~ - .., t~ N © .. .a!.: ?t° Pe ,ai +~e ~' ~° ~ 4; eta; , ~.2 ~~ '1;ie~: ~ Eb a ~~~i~;3~ ~, e ::,:;: a ~ e"~~t; a ~" ~ a~a`it~~ a ai~ siaa ~~ x, . ~ ~ , R~~; ~ ~i 't~i ~ e;~t , ~~ .~ _ ... .~~ ;_~,, (. z.. CO ~= • .i ((1~. Q~`" ~GJ ~°>- ~J ~~~''1 Y2~:~,c'~' 3 C L ~? ;~i~f~i'~~i=f''fliil i~if~~i @pp! ~'~ ~.II~ ,~~~ €.j;.S11::iiii :~~ i { p 71 ; ~ 1:., Y~,, .a~t~~N, ';,t i~ti i ~ti'/i 'll1 ~ ~ i1 /~~ 41"' / ~ ~•y ~s' .7a1 ~ ~ ,~'l }~~ ~ _ ~' "]y~j.~'ai: ~n Wis. iri~ -~ ,~ rY ~ _ y l ' Y. ~.. ; rr 1, • f~~f ( . ; ~.'.~~ '.~~ I 1 ~ ~ n` ` ~ ~ I `\ _ '~ ~ ~' s1~ .,~. ~~.~;~~ ~,G~r,~y"~,~ fir?-' tl~ac.l"c€3:;wt r~'~;- 7`f 'r D FI i~,~ 'ii i _ _F~~~~ FIIOOEN ,~?' ~ ,ia .., : ~ ~l _ I'LL TT IC~~7 _ Draitia9 e snap £~ctfi~iT "~" ~ LIMIT j' ~~y ~ ~~ ., _ _J~/ _ . < C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAPfONCA INITIAL STUDY • PART I - PROJECT IL'IU RMATZON SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $T 0.00 For all projects recuiring environmental revieeu, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is mad_. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare - Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and tale action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. T::^.e Cornittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmertal impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning C the proposed project. - • PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract No. 1027" APPLICAA'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHO Nc: _ Barmakian-Wolff E Associates,•9375 ArchibalG Avenue, Suite L01, Rancho ..ucamonga, CA 91730 98%-0969 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CO NCERVZNG TFIIS PROJECT: Linville-Sanderson-Horn E Assoc., 9587 Arrow Route, Suite H, Rancho Cuc arnon4a, CA 91730 714/980-1211 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS Ar'D ASSESSOR PAitCEL NO.) North site of Almond Street, east o: carnelian Avenue, City of Ra nc:^o Cucamonga. Assessor Parcel No, 1061-171-C2 _ LIST OTHER PE Rb1I TS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE ANO FEDERAL AGE::CIES AND TFIE AGENCY ISSUING SUCEi PERK ITS: • -T--~I/ PROJECT DESCRIPTION • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: A Proposed 30 lot custom subdivision for single family dwellines. Lar^-= ~otc (~..,_~ 90 nnn ~., ~~..e feet) on proposed R-1-20 zoning. Protect to be diviaod Auto four phases. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUI LDZi7GS, IF AVY: 24.36 acres DESCRIBE THE E.P7IR0*~~*ITAL SETT I`7G OF THE PROJECT SITE INC LL'D IiiG INFU R:1'aT2O Di Oh TO FOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIitALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, Ab'D THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Sit= if par*. Tally covered by citrus and eucalvotus trees. Gopher, rabbit, lizards, ground squirrels, and birds are common to ne area. e topograpny is ,as toTlows: erne we-' s'terSy 337 feet alopes southeas`2eciy'at approximately-Lh`i into an existin; canyon, wh:le~the remainder slopes Bout • westerly at approximately 10; towards the sane canvon. Soil is very rocky. Site is traversed by two north-south canyons. one of which is anpeo ximately 3s2 feet east of the westerly prone rty line, while the other is alone the edee of the . easre rl~, ^ro perry lint. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cvmv la rive actions, which although individually small, ~' may as a whole have significant environmental impact? - Ti: is~ arc ieot is divided into four phases with a total of 30 ;- First plisse contains 8 lots. / 1. I- 2 --.,----.~~_-------------7.7_-----..... -.,.~, l C 1 .- WILL Tfl IS PP.OJECT: YES A',O . X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand £or municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?150 Aperc: _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flam.;,a bles or explosives? , Explanation of any YES answers aka ve: _ .. - -Item #4; Existine zone is_q-1-5, which yFg,o~Q~o to be A-1-20. _ Zt=m #5:. Prefect will use as much cP eristin¢ contours and trees as possible, except in pad locations. Zi~;P/RTANT: Zf the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next pace. CERTZFICAT IO N: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the date and information recuired for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional info raation may be required to. be s 'tted - before an adequate evaulation cart be m by th e; ~o •.enc Review Committee. C ~{(~,(1C~t ~ ,~ ~. Date C' ~ ~.J Signature lrc~~- ri -~i i- ~ m o i~ Gar[tt:.ie tiarcmxrn 3~7(j Title ~ s RESIDE*1mZAi, covsTrvcTloN The follo:~ing information should be provided to the city of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the , sc:~ool district to accortrtodate the proposed residential development. Name o.` Developer and Tentative Tract No.: ~y-(n2,1.{:G~Y~~~6-}-~~~'~, Specific Location of Projeet:~C.?('~~~~i C'9'~`Q(ia~~1~. 1. Na;;ocr of Single family units: 2. Nu.:vSer of multiple family units: __ PHASE I PIiASE 2 PHAS° 3 8 7 6 PHASE 4 TOTAL 3 30 ~~~. 3, be tirpconosedction: 1=_~'~~ 11^"I-UI ~~~,~~ ~!J._,~'l 4: Earliest date of I J /1 J~^~}~2 r occuuan cY: _ ~-- ~Gf~l 9 !~"~ ~' 1 JU J . ~-~47~~` ..,.~ _ Model '~ and ~ of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Rarce --~ LEI-ICY) ~CL'Y~~~~ *4~~`~~._ f'2 - lC4- ~m~---> ~ ~34~ ~, • x- 4 ~..~ RESOLUTION N0. 81-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 10277 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10277, hereinafter "Map" suhmitted by Barmakian/Wolff Associates, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 24.36 acres of land located on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street into 30 tots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on February 26, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NO';1, THEREFORE, the Planning Conmiss ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION I: The Planning Conmission makes the following findings • in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10277 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and Specific plans; (h) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health prohlems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. J T~ IuCt. .W. ai-lD Page 2 • (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10277, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions; Engineering Division 1. Dedication by separate instruments of that portion of "A" Street and the southerly half of Almond Street, which are beyond the tract boundary, shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the final map. 2. An offer of dedication for a 60-foot wide easement for stormdra in purposes along the existing drainage course at the easterly tract boundary shall be made on the final map. 3. Drainage crossings with adequate inlet and outlet structures shall be installed to the satisfaction of,the City Engineer where the fire lanes and equestrian trails cross the existing drainage courses. 4. A minimum of 50-foot building setback lines from the • flowline of the existing drainage courses shall be established and shall be delineated on the final map. The set-back lines shall remain in force until such time as the master planned storm drain facilities are constructed at the easterly drainage course and erosion protection measures are provided at the westerly drainage course. 5. Building pads adjacent to the drainage courses shall be elevated a minimum of 2 feet above 100-year flood elevations on the said drainage courses. Hydrology and hydraulic calculations to determine flood elevation shall be submitted for review by the City Engineer. 6. The applicant shall be required to upgrade, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the existing drainage culverts across Hidden Farm Road and Strang Lane at the downstream portion of the drainage course which traverses through the westerly part of the tract. 7. The applicant shall be required to upgrade and provide erosion protection measures at the confluence of those two drainage courses at north of Hiliside Drive which traverse through the subject tract. ~/ Page 3 8. All existing easements lying within the future right-of- • way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 9. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 10. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City standards. 11. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 12. If, the City Engineer determines that runoff from the tract flows onto private downstream properties, letters of acceptance shall be required. 13. Private drainage easements with improvements for cross lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated on the final map. 14. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation of street improvements, the developer shall contact the aporapriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements which would give the • company the opportunity to install cable at the time of trenching. If the cable television company does not install cable, then the developer shall install conduit and pull boxes throughout the tract. Such details shall 6e shown and verified on the improvement plans. Buil ding Division 15. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completi f l on o a l on-site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels, to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 16. Appropriate easements, for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted unto or over adjacent parcels , are to 6e delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 17. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewat eying or protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to, or contributes to, drainage flows entering, leaving or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. • ~a iun an rlo. tll-lo Page 4 • 18. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1981. PLANNING COh1M ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONGA I, JACK LA!1, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning • Conmission held on the 25th day of February, 1980 by the follwoing vote to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Tolstoy, Rempel, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nane ABSTAIN: COMMiSS 10N ERS: King • ~3 PEPARTMENT OF COMPIUNIT-Y DEVELOPMENT C ` STANDARD CONDITIONS Sub;ect: TE~lTATIY~ 7~_ {n277 ~ Applic Loco ti Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. - _ 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorpora tin9 all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. ~3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. C ~4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideya rd area fir Recrei~n Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Nail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located 6y the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. ~7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of huil ding permits. 9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integ ra led, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by Che Planning and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of [he project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the sa tisfac ticn of the Director of Community Oev elopmen [. • Z54- 11. A detailed lighting plan shall he submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of • shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. _ 12. A71 swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall • he solar heated. _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. _ 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first - unit. • _ 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a ' clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. ~17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. _ 19. All units within this development shall be Preplumbed to be adapted • fora solar water heating unit. - 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. _ 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a _ solar water heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior [o approval and recordation of the fjnal map. ~24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance - of equestrian trails. • ~~ 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and/or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. 'Affordability shall • 1 he determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall 6e submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building pe reits and occupancy'of the units. B. Pa rk ino and Vehicular Access _ 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two-way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall 6e provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. _ 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. _ 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. / __ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C. C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. b R. 's shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. l.a ndscaoing I. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved / by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. V 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of exis [ing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shalt take into account Che proposed r, rading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved _ 6y the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. L. • J 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall 6e ' trimmed and topped-at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division . during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On-Site Trees. Those trees ,which are approved for removal may be required to 6e replaced on a tree-for-tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20%-24" box or larger, 70%-15 gallon, and 10%-5 gallon. _ 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes 6e landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy far those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in • satisfactory condition. In the'case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control sa ti.sfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. ~~~ 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall 6e fully maintained ' by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. ~30. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within [he project. _ 12. SFecial landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, specimen size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along • C D. Si~nS - C _ 1. Any signs proposed for this Bevel ooment sha 11 be designed in conformance with [he Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approva• by the Planning Division prior to instailati on of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Aoorovals Required _ 1. Director Review shall 6e accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. __ 2. Director Review shall be accomolished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No.~p~ is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change Q~ 12, 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted fora period of month(s) at which time the Pianning Comniss ion may add or delete conditions or revoke C the Conditional Use Permit. • 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract _, on 1 have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lut is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to 6e filed by the developer with the City prior to OCCU pa nCy. ~6. prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of huildinq permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall he submitted [o [he Department of Cocanuni ty pevelopment which states that adequate School facilities are or - will be capable of aceeTmoda Ling students generated by this project. Such lot^;,r of certification prat have been issued 6y the School District within v ~~y (60J days prior to the final map approval in the case o` the Subdivision L map or issuance of permits in the rse of all other residential projects. • G [• _~, 7. ' Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance ~ of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will b il bl t th d e ava a e o serve e propose project, shall be submitted to the • Department of Coamunity Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive info nnation, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. ~8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative su6d ivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. ~9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply fora point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPL ICA?1T SHALL CONTACT THE .BUILDING DIVISiO^I FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLL041ING CO^DITIONS: T F. Site Development • ~/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for cambusti ble construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. ~3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit fora new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new ~commerc ial or industrial ' development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Developmer[ Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan C'r~ed:ing Fees. This approval shalt become null and void if building permits are not issued far this project u+i thin one year from the date of project approval. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. I1 t; J ~7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non-combustiblE roof material. C _ 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the • street upgrade with additional woad trim around windows and wood siding or plan-ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shalt be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Lode. H. Grading ~1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall 6e in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall 6e prepared by a qualify ed engineer licensed by the • State of California to perform such work. _ 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall 6e completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICAWT SHP.LL CONTACT THE ENGINEER RIG Di Vi5i0fl FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLL041i NG CO'10ITI Oils: Oedica ti ons and Vehicular Access ~1. Dedications shall 6e made by final map of all interior street rights-of -~vay and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative moo. _ 2. Dedication shall 6e made of the following missing rights-of-way on the following streets: 1, additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on_ • d ~ .~_ Corner property line radius will be-required per City standards. _ 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as '' follows- _ 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engre ss and internal circulation of any trucks which will he used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. D. Street Imorovemen is 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curh and • gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streetsf 9Nh~leet Ta PlaroLr^Ccvnnissf~d rescluutai ~~eyccrJuvy sideuxik plnceine~~. / 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: • • STREET PlAh1E COR9 8 GOTTER A.C. :. PVMT: SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVEP,LAY WHEEL CHAiR RAtAPS _I OTHER 1 _ - - _ I / - - -'~'-- -- -' - I ~3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. . _~ 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared 6y a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 5., Surety shall 6e posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the• City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of [he public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. _ / 6. A71 street improvemen is shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. ~7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. ~/ K. Drainage and Flood Control _ C ~ 1. The aoplicant will be responsible for construction of,all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. • _ 2. In to rsection drains will be required ~at the following locations: _ 3. The proposed project fialls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall will 6e required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streetrcr 1v existi~ dazlrrye [eu lSr?. _ 5. The following north-south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and/or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall 6e installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. 2. Utility easements shall 6e provided to the specification of the serving ~, utility companies and the City Engineer. _ • 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. / 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. f 5. 4la ter and sewer system plans shall 6e designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino, A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may 6e received from them. fi. General Racuirom,ents and Apn rova is ' 1. Pe rni[s frcm other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: C B. Lo unty Oust Abatement required prior Co issuance of a grading permit) ~C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District . _D. Other: ~~ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions-and Restrictions (CCER's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of • the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to ~~~ the City. 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. ~4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and Drocedures. • C ORDINANCE N0. I ~D • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 1061-171-02 FROM A-1-5 TO R-I-20,000, LOCATED ON THE NOATH SIDE OF ALMOND ROAD, EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That [he Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and [his City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the Ceneral Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact ae provided in [he Negative Declaration filed • herein. SECTION 2: The following descr ibed~real property is hereby rezoned in [he manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. A-1-5 (limited agricultural) to R-1-20,000 (single family residential). Said property is located on the north side of Almond Road, Eas[ of Carnelian Street, knownas As seseor's Parcel No. 1061-171-02. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause [he same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and c ircula Ced in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • G t~ Ordinance :70. Page 2 • Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Tauten M. Wasserman, City Clerk • • /~ • • CITY QF RANCI l0 CUCi>,MOiVC',A STAFF REPORT Date: March 18, 1981 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Designation of Street Tree Plantings on Highland Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue as a Historical Landmark Find attached the application for Historic Landmark designation regarding the above referenced item submitted to Council by a unanimous vote of the Historic Preservation Commission on March 10, 1981. The subject plantings are within the public right-of-way of State Highway 30. A representative of Cal Trans was present at the Commissions' public hearing inquiring as to 'why would we want to save these trees'. Commis- sion responded that the plantings in part date back to 1883 when this part of our community was first settled. RECOMMEHOATiON OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION: Designate, by Ordi- nance, the subject Street ree plantings as an Historic Landmark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WLH: 1977 ~O C~~CnMO,yc' (((~~~```~ r O ' O F ~ Z U > ~V .;pi a...u ~~~ / / HISi G.RfC U1:~;C~iAHK Oes ir.^a[ion • IC EiRIFiCdT I0:1 1. Cor. nn name: Palm anG Eucalyptus P.tr<at Plnn 2. Nis to tic name, if knarn: 7. Street or rvral address: IiLvRlantl Ave. Stn to P.o ute 30 Ci ty: Rancho Cucamn nva Zip: 91730 County: San Sernnr0lr. Assessor's parcel no. Zone: _ Le9a1 description:( H1aR la nd Ave. between ELS wards Ave, and Enst Ave. EtSva nda, Ca llf. 4. Present owner, if known: State of call torn la Address: San ?ernerCSno tit?h~..ey Gepartm ant [i [y: ZiP: ~ Ownership is: Public z private 5. Present Use: Pa rk.ay Tree Planting Original Use• name and wl rdDrenke Other pass uses: _ , • DESCRIPTION fi. Hri efly describe the present physi <al aooea ranee of the Site or structure and desc rf Se any major alts ra [ions rom-7 't s original condition: Trees ere in gcod condltlon, n Sew Rave Daen removed on the nortm elde of the toed, Adwltlo nal eucal yptus trees Rnve Deen Dla nted o0 the sou tF, aide, attar 1925. F. LPCa efpnat sketch map (draw and label 8. Approximate property sf ze: site and surrounding 5tr¢ets, roads, tot size (in feet) ~ and prominent landmarksf: Frontage fr m13e Depth 66 rt. I Hlk H I or approx. ac reage tour t 1 9. Condition: (check one) s3 74 15 I 36 II i a. Excellent- h, Goad x ~ .W ^- vT.e~i'..S c. Fafr_ d, OeteA ora tad e. Na longer in exf sCance 4 1 3 2 i t I. _ 10. Is the fca LUre a. Altered?_ ':.; P.lk J I b. Unaltered?_' Ic m 11. Surroundings: (check more than one ` ^ Ip if n¢CCisary) ,y y a. Open land A p, Residential ~ ~ e. Sm Cte red buildings- . _.".-"''^:I.e. -. ._-- _.. -~ d. OenselY build-up_ e. [orsrerc iai_ f. Industrial ~~ 1~ g. Other ~. 12. Thread to site: • a. I:one knann_ b. Pri va [e devclopment~~ c. Zoning d. Public Norks Project x e. Vandali;n_ f. ONer 17. Oates of enclosed photograph(s) n.,.. to cyan MOTE: The fol7owiny (Renrs 14-19) are for sirudures only. 14. Primary exterior building material: a. S[ane_ b. Brick_ <. Stucco- d. Adpbe_ e. uood_ f. Other ' ' 15. Is the structure: a. On its original site?_ b. Moved?_ c. 0nknawn? 15. Year of initial constrvction 1883 This date 1s: a. Factual' b. Estimated x' 17. Architect (if known): 3'reee~chvsen Dy 'b'm'. Chats ey~-~~~~~~~- 19. Oui lder (if known): " Oeo.~Froe Lavpervlaed the ~plantinge 19. Related features: a. Earn- b. Carriage house-- e. Outhause~ d. Shed(s)- e. Formal ga rden(s )_ _ 1. Mindmill__, g. Natertower/tankhause_ h. Other- 1. Npne S1Gf1IF ICAiiGE 20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural inpartance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site when known): Geo. and Wm. Cha'fey tree tad the Etlwa nLa Colony and deaiar.!d ' the Iota and atre eLa. 1be alm, Pepper, Eucelyptue ant ~revllla trox Aua trolls were the den by Wm. Chaffey. Geo. Front helped averaee the plan Linea. Capt. J.eco tt built the first house an Lot 15, Elk E. after Lhe Chatfepe eubdlvlded, Epr SnE of lee2. 21. Mafn theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture- b. Arts 6 Lelsure_ c. Economic/Industrial- d. Covernmeni e. Explara ti on/Settlement x f. MiliLary_ g. Religion h. Social/Education 22. Sources: Lis[ boa ks, documen L•, surveys, personal intervf ews, and [heir dates. 1. Llfe mC Geo. Cheffey by J.A. Alexander. 2. American ?SOrre p;;y aM GenealoEy. Ca11f. Ed ltlon. Yol .,1 3. lntervlew wl th Cheater Frost. Cac. 30, 19e0 27. Oats form prepared 1 6 198IDy (wme): 9obert L. MSckcox Address: 79'0 Valle '/Se t.a C{ty: Cucamon ca, Calif. Zip; 917°0 Phone: 9e2-C 3qa Organization: Rancho Cucsme r.ra Mls to rlcal oxm _ , ^(y use Only gi .. ! .~ • ORDINANCE N0. I'"II AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE PALM AND EUCALYPTUS STREET PLANTINGS ON HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEP.TURE OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LAND- MARK The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that the Palm and Euca yptl us Street plantings on Highland Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue have met the criteria established in Ordinance No. 70 for the Historic Preservation, and therefore, and with the recommen- dation of the Historic Preservation Conmission, designates it as a Historic Landmark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to 6e pu hl fished within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in TheThe 0a~1 Rene o~rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City • o ntaf 0 rio, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: P- hip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City C erk • ~~ ,~ ~~^~ '• A LLt Lope Aiemuy BsAw, a! d eels Ie 9vk,1 March 10, 1961 Ms_ Lauren Wasserman, City Manager/Clerk City Hall 9320 Base Line Road, Unit C Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730 Dear Ms. Wasserman: • The inland Empire Cultural Foundation has been designated by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors to undertake a Needs Assessment and, from it, develop a proposed Compre- hensive Countywide Arts Plan. This project has now been completed and copies of it have been, or will be, presented to the various City Councils of incorporated cities in our county. When the report is submitted to the California Arts Council in Sacramento (the deadline for that is March 31st) it must be accompanied by what the Council calls Public Arts Expenditure Forms. These forms were previously sent to cities and school districts directly by the Council with an explanatory letter. Unfortunately, neither the Council nor this organization has any record that you have returned those forms. We enclose another one (or set, if appropriate) which we urge you to fill out and have s~ci ned and return to us as rapidly as possible. IvLA~~TD EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION 11IB1 Smto Antonio Dnre, Suite J, Colton, Cdlfamlo 92884 (71i) BR{-821p hod Ms. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager/Clerk City Hall • March 10, 1981 Page Two Where we have been advised verbally of the appropriate fig- ure, we have filled it in. Since the acceptance of this report should mean additional money coming into San Bernardino County to support arts activities here, and since the March 31st deadline is loom- ing ever closer, we ask you to act on this as rapidly as possible. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely yours, INL(A~N1D EMPIN~R.EW~C1o~U+LVT~URAL FOUNDATION A1deGodf rey • Executive Director Enclosure ANG/bjt , -` / • 1~ RESOLUTION N0. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI1E CITY OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SAN BERNARDINO COMPREHENSIVE COUNTYWIDE ARTS PLAN AS PREPARED BY THE INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION WHEREAS the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation has prepared a comprehensive arts plan for the County of San Bernardino including the City of _ and WHEREAS said plan assesses the existing arts resources and needs and makes recommendations for future development of the arts in San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS said plan was prepared following hearings wherein the residents of the County of San Bernardino were requested to make known their views and desires relating to the arts within San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS said plan requests no facilities, staff or funds from the City of and WHEREAS said plan was prepared in accordance with the guide- lines of the California Arts Council State/Local Partnership Program; and WHEREAS said plan must be submitted to the California Arts Council by March 31st, 1981, in order for San Bernardino County to become eligible to apply for certain arts plan- ning and programming funds; and WHEREAS the City of desires to endorse the San Bernardino Comprehensive Countywide Arts Plan, NOW THEREFORE HE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of that the San Bernardino Com- prehensive Countywide Arts Plan as prepared by the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation be and is hereby approved and that the City Clerk of the City of is hereby authorized and directed to transmit a certi red copy of this Resolution to the California Arts Council. ADOPTED this day of March, 1981. AYES: __ NOES: ABSENT ATTEST: CITY OF , CALIFORNIA By City Clerk City Manager c ~~ d K • ~• ~ y ~, ~7 ~ 3 0 o ;; w O ~l ro w J O O O Y n m 7 H [7 [+ O n ~n 7 H x M N x H ro 0 r w 0 m r O A ~] w yN r K M '~ M b q~ ti n 11 I~ b ~. ~ ~. STATE/LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY AND COMPREHENSIVE COUNTYWIDE ARTS PLAN CONDUCTED BY: INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION • UNDER A GRANT FRON.: CALIFORNIA ARTS COUNCIL SANUARY - MARCH, 1981 L 1 O? TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER Section 1 The Background ' 1-2 Section 2 The Planning Agency i 3-5 Section 3 The 'Area-San Bernardino County 6-8` Section 4 The Needs Assessment Part I Questionnaires and Interviews 9-Z7 Section 5 The Needs Assessment Part II Public Meetings ~yg_gl Section 6 The Needs Assessment Part III Needs and Goals gp_gB Section ~ The Future - Recommendations q9-56 e • • • ld ~ L l TABLE OF CONTENTS • PAGE NUMBER Appendix A The Questionnaire I-V Appendix B Expenditures on Cultural Arts Programs by Cities VI-VII Appendix C Expenditures on Cultural Arts • Programs by County ~ VIII Appendix D Listing of Educational Institutions IX-XI2 Appendix E Available (Large) Facilities XIII-XVII Appendix F Organizations Participating in Survey Interviews and ~ Questionnaires XVIII-XXIII Appendix G Population by Race, Sex, and • Age XXIV Appendix H Civilian Labor Force by Race, Sex, and Age XXV Appendix I Survey of Buying Power XXVI-XXVII Appendix J The Media XXVIII-XXX Appendix K Board of Directors of the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation XXXI-XXXIII • ~O~ l ~ SECTION I • THE BACKGROUND The State/Local Partnership Program was established by the California Arts Council and the State Legislature to encourage local cultural planning and decision-making and to reach pre- viously underserved constituencies. As defined by the Council, the objectives of the program are: 1. To provide a mechanism for more effective local arts planning and to coordinate such planning with state programs. 2. To develop rural and suburban areas which have not fully participated in arts programs. 3. To expand the private sector support for arts at the local level. • 4. To give local government agencies the opportunity to assist the California Arts Council in improving the efficiency of arts programming. 5. To provide a more stable base of support for the arts at the local level. 6. To provide a potential decentralization mechanism for other California Arts Council programs. 7. To prevent duplication and overlap between Federal fadministe red through the Council?, State and Local program funds. 8. To provide for increased employment of artists. 9. To stimulate the local economy. To achieve--or, as the Council puts it, to actualize--these objectives, the Council designated $1,100,000.00 to the pro- gram. 1 • Ib~ THE BACKGROUND (CONTINUED) Each county was given a bloc grant of $12,000.00, either to spend itself through an agency of its own or to give to a designated agency. With this the agency was to undertake a countywide needs assessment and, based upon these identified and prioritized needs, to develop a comprehensive countywide arts plan. The agency designated by the Board of Supervisors in San Bernardino County for this project was the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation. And this is the reaort and plan it has developed and here- with presents. • lJ 107 SECTION 2 • THE PT.ANNING AGENCY The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation was formed in the spring and summer of 1980 as, generally speaking, a "united way for the arts." It designates as its service area the "metropolitan areas of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties." It should be noted that this constitutes the fourth largest metropolitan area in the State of California and the twenty-fifth largest in the entire nation. However, wisely, in its incorporation the founders of the Foundation specifically provided for expansion into "such other adjacent areas" as determined by the Board of Directors with the intent, eventually, of servicing all of both counties. In its Statement of Purpose the Foundation declares that it • "exists to unite arts organizations, donors, community and business leaders, and the communities themselves in a common effort to advance, support, and enhance the cultural arts programs, services, and activities of the people in the area it serves. "We believe that arts are both a community concern and an individual responsibility of each citizen and that support of the arts is best accomplished through a planned and business- like approach, "To that end, the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation will pro- mote unity of action among community leaders and other volunteers, prospective donors (business and individual), governmental units, and arts organizations. Fund-raising will be on an areawide basis and progressively each year more inclusive of prospective corporate contributors, local businesses, governmental entities, foundations, professional organizations, interested individual donors, and other speci- fied groups. "The objective of the fund-raising effort is to provide a balanced program of cultural arts presented by affiliated organizations, governed by their own boards, who have joined • I n~ c THE PLANNING AGENCY (CONTINUED) • in this coordinated undertaking to conserve time and effort, reduce cost and duplication, and to raise urgently needed funds in a more efficient and effective manner. Those organi- zations receiving funds from the Inland Empire Cultural Founda- tion are expected not to solicit supporters of the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation. "The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation accepts the stewardship responsibility which comes with solicited funds to see that they are fairly allocated and intelligently spent. The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation will also encourage, through funding, development of programs to meet unmet cultural needs in our area." _ In its initial fund-raising campaign, conducted simultaneously with its organization, the Foundation was extremely success- ful, raising some 116 per cent of its initial goal. Future campaigns are planned for April and May and organi- zation already is well underway for the 1981 effort. • The Board of Directors of the Foundation, all of whom serve without reimbursement, are listed in this report as Appendix K. The officers of the Foundation are: President: William Honeysett, Publisher, San Bernardino Sun. Vice President: Mrs. Sharon Hodgdon, San Bernardino Businesswoman and civic leader. Treasurer: Les Richter, President, Riverside International Raceway. Secretary: J. Edward Karp, President, Redlands Federal Savings and Loan Association. The executive director of the Foundation is Alden Godfrey. Mr. Godfrey is a past executive director of COMBO (Combined Arts and Education Council of San Diego County, probably the most successful arts council in California) as well as 4 /~ / THE PLANNING AGENCY (CONTINUED) • several United Ways. As a volunteer, he is a past president of the Alliance of California Arts Councils (ACACI and a vice president of the California Confederation of the Arts. Mr. Godfrey served as the project director for this State/ Local Partnership Program study. He is, therefore, the primary author of this study and report. In both the needs assessment and/or the preparation of the report he was assisted by: James Hardesti, Public Relations Cirector of the , Foundation. Bonnie Taylor, Executive Secretary of the Foundation. Julia Hester. Jean Wright. Dr. David Shichvr. Mmes. Hester and Wright are sociology students at California • State College, San Bernardino, who undertook assist pug in this project as their semester's work. Dr. Shichor, their faculty advisor, generously participated in numerous planning and review meetings. 5 . )ID ti l ~ SECTION 7 C~ THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS Given the general Goals/Objectives developed, the logical next step is to present recommendations for achieving and/or accomplishing those Goals/Objectives. This leads inevitably to the requirement that some agency be designated to undertake that responsibility. Even if nothing else were ever to happen, additional money will be available shortly to San Bernardino County (from $5,000.00 to $10,000.00), as the second part of this State/Local Partner- ship Program. Someone, or some agency, must decide, where, how, and in what amounts that money will be spent. In our opinion there are at least four acceptable alternatives for accomplishing this plus several other possibilities which were rejected as unacceptable. • Our recommendation is that the Hoard of Supervisors designate the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation (with certain changes in its organizational structure) to administer and to imple- ment this undertaking. The three other alternatives are: 1. Create a new division within the County Parks and Recreation Department. 2. Create an entirely new office or department within the County government. 3. Either hire an arts coordinator, or designate one from among present County employees, who would be made a special assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer of the County. The following pertinent points were taken into consideration in determining our recommendation: 1. The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation, in developing this Needs Assessment and Comprehensive Countywide Arts Plan, has gained considerable important infor- mation about, and understanding of, cultural arts 49 THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) • groups and arts-oriented individuals throughout the county which would be invaluable in any extension of this undertaking. The Foundation already considers its service area to include the metropolitan area of San Bernardino County in which the great percentage of the county's popu- lation resides. 3. The Executive Committee of the Foundation is prepared to recommend to the Board of Directors that it vote to expand its service areo to include the remainder of the County and to provide for additional representation on the Board from the new areas. The Foundation was originally established to serve the greater San Bernardino/Riverside/Ontario/Redlands metropolitan area. We consider this to be a single community which happens to have a county line rvnning through it. Our Board is drawn from both counties. We support organizations in both counties. The Fovna - tion is also the designated agency of the County of • Riverside under the State/Local Partnership Program. It is our hope and intent to continue our regional planning approach but this will only be possible if ~: are designated by the Boards of Supervisors of both counties. .a r Since, obviously, funding to realize the Goals/ Objectives already identified must be considerably greater than will be realized from the California Arts Council, the Foundation has already established itself as a successful fund-raising organization. And, as a private organization rather than one affiliated with some branch of county or city government, we are more likely to be successful in appealing to private in- dustry for financial support. Through its Admissions and Allocations Committee, the Foundation already has the necessary structure, and volunteer experience, foz dealing with a variety of arts organizations and individuals. Through its Educational Council of the Inland Empire, the Foundation already has the necessary structure and volunteer experience for dealing with, and re- lating to, the majority of the educational institutions in the County. 50 • / / o'- C • THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) S. Through its Board of Directors and other volunteer structures, the Foundation already has a group of volunteers widely representative of the metropolitan area of the County, most of its cities, and, especially, of its major arts organizations. 9. The Foundation already has a staff executive of proven administrative capability, knowledgeable in fund- raising, experienced in the arts and with arts organi- zations, and familiar with the policies and require- ments of the California Arts Council in general and of the State/Local Partnership Program in particular. LOCAL PRIORITIES GRANT Regardless of what decision the Board of Supervisors makes regarding the designation of an organization, following re- view and approval of this Needs Assessment and Plan it will be forwarded to Sacramento for review and approval of the California Arts Council. • Still remaining from the original $1,100,000.00 allocated to the State/Local Partnership Program is $416,000.00. This is to be divided up among the participating counties on a dollar- to-dollar matching basis on a formula based on two factors. 1. Need factor. a. This is defined as the total allocation divided by the total percentage of the population of California residing in any county. This factor will receive sixty per cent of the Local Priorities monies. 2. Effort factor. a. This is defined as the total per capita spending for the arts by local government agencies, as adjusted to reflect average personal income. This factor will receive forty per cent of the Local Priorities monies. lJ 51 I~ C ~ THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) LOCAL PRIORITIES GRANT (CONTINUED) For example: county population X 5212,400 county funding state population based on need county per capita arts support county average personal income g 5141,600 county funding total o above figures based on effort for all counties county funding + county funding - total county based on need based on effort Local Priorities Grant It is anticipated that Local Priorities Grants may be used for Direct Programming, Technical Assistance, Information Services, and/or Grants Programs, as long as grant monies are spent according to local plans and California Arts Council funding policies. These policies include high artistic achievement, equitable recognition and compensation of artists for their work, and recognition of cultural diversity. RECOMMENDATIUNS FOA ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OBJECTIVES AUDIF.NC6 DEVELOPMENT 1. Work with, and encourage, school districts to increase and improve arts-related courses. 2. Work with, and encourage, estahlished arts organi- zations to assist in the creation, and improvement, of such courses and to involve themselves in the teaching thereof and otherwise to act as resources. 52 • • • " I C THE £UTU RE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) LJ RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED) AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) 3. In concert (no pun intended) with the California Arts Council, arrange for greater utilization of such Council programs as the Dance Touring Program, Artists in Schools, etc. 4. In concert with the schools and the performing arts organizations, arrange for greater attendance of stu- dents at arts presentations, utilizing free tickets, discounted tickets, and whatever other means are in- dicated and are feasible. 5. Arrange for individual artists to visit schools, to participate in arts training and programs. 6. Arrange for arts organizations, schools, and local businesses to cooperate in sponsoring children- oriented workshops and seminars. • 7. In cooperation with organizations for senior citizens and those for the handicapped, arrange necessary transportation, discounted or free tickets, and pre- sentations by individual artists and arts organi- zations at meetings and hospitals. 8. In cooperation with clubs, groups, and organizations of ethnic and minority adults and children, seek to involve that constituency in the "main stream" of the community's arts programming and, where indicated, with equal diligence seek to create arts programming more orientated to their wishes. 9. Provide technical assistance to individual groups and offer central services to all groups in the areas of promotion and publicity to assist in improving public information programs and creating a greater awareness of the programs presented within the community. 10. Take a leadership role in insuring the formation of an effective, functioning arts council in each community (or, where indicated, communities( and to work toward the formation of a countywide arts council in addition. 53 I~h THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) • RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED) AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) 11. Encourage cultural arts organizations as well as individual artists to provide programs and services in areas and to groups which are, or could be, culturally-deprived. For example, there are two Sierra Conservation Centers in San Bernardino County whose inmates are badly in need of a variety of arts programs, both classes and events. 12. Etc., etc. FACILITIES 1. Identify and classify all existing facilities that can be used for cultural presentations or for meetings of cultural organizations. 2. Serve as a coordinator to bring together arts organi- zations needing facilities and facilities that are • available. 3. Work with the managers of facilities to insure the greatest possible utilization on a regularly scheduled basis. 4. Work with managers of public facilities to evaluate such facilities to determine what changes and/or im- provements are needed to make them more suitable for cultural presentations. 5. In concert with the managers of public facilities urge the appropriate bodies (City Councils, etc.) to make such improvements. 6, Etc., etc. FINANCING 1. Work toward establishing "central services" wherever possible for all arts organizations land, where in- dicated, individual artists) with the resultant sav- ings in money. 54 • L/J c ~ THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) • RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED) FINANCING (CONTINUED) 2. Assist in coordinating the space requirements of various groups to determine whether joint occupancy would be feasible and cost-saving. 3. Assist the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation in its annual fund-raising campaign to insure its success in eliciting support from the business and private sect- ors for the arts. 4. Assist local cultural organizations and individual artists in making application to the California Azts Council, the National Endowment fo.. the Arts, uiu other foundations and funding sources. 5. Assist the California Confederation of the Arts in its annual effort to secure legislative support for the proposed California Arts Council budget. • 6. Etc., etc. EXPRESSION 1. Actively promote and publicize all forms of cultural arts in local media. 2. Act as a central clearinghouse for information on local cultural events. 3. Assist in finding sponsorship for programs of cultural events by minority and ethnic groups to acquaint other residents with different forms of artistic expression. 4. Encourage arts festivals and similar multi-disciplined presentations and, in so doing, cultivate the par- ticipation of less-known forms of art, both experi- mental and traditional. 5. Etc., etc. 55 I c THE FUTDRE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) • RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED) ZN CONCLUSION The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation is happy to have con- ducted this Needs Assessment and to prepare this Countywide Arts Plan for submission to the Board of Supervisors. Zn doing so we have expended the Planning Grant plus some additional funds of our own, which we do cheerfully as a contribution to this important undertaking. Whether the Board elects to designate us as the agency to carry on with this program or not, the Foundation stands ready to assist the Board in any way it can in any endeavor in the cultural arts field. We also specifically offer to provide the required "matching funds" for the Local Priorities Grant part of this program. And, finally, we thank the Hoard of Supervisors for desig- nating us to undertake this project and we also extend our • appreciation to the hundreds, even thousands, of our fellow- residents of ~ n Bernardino County who participated through their attendance at meetings, by responding to questionnaires, and in personal interviews, and in many other ways. 56 • (C% CITY OF RANCIHO CIJCAMOIVGA STAFF REPORT GATE: April 1, 1981 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: REQUEST TO RECONSIDER REVERSION TO ACREAGE FOR TRACTS 9399 AND 9400 N/S OF BANYAN BETWEEN CARNELIAN AND BERYL • Last year the City Council took action to revert to acreage Tracts 9399 and 9400 on the north side of Banyan between Carnelian and Beryl because the owners of the tract allowed the improvement agreement and bonds to lapse on the County approved tracts. However, a quirk in the Subdivision Map Act requires that the signature of the property owner is necessary in order to record a reversion map. The owner, of course, does not wish to sign. Therefore, although the Map Act allows clear authority for the City to revert a map to acreage, the process is not technically completed until the recordation of the reversion map. Two tracts are in a semi- state of limbo. Senator gyala's office has indicated that he would spon- sor a clean up bill to rectify the inconsistency in the Subdivision Map Act. However, whether this matter is rectified or not, any submission of anew map would render the whole issue academic because the City would process a map from scratch. The City has been approached 6y John Upton, the developer of Prado Woods Homes, with a request for the City to rescind its reversion decision in order that his firm might purchase the property according to the previously approved maps. His firm would enter into a new improvement agreement and post new bonds. Mr. Upton's letter is at- tached to the staff report and Mr. Upton will be available to present his reasons before the City Council. Res e~6fu ply'suhmitted, JACK LAM, Oirecta'r of _,_,... ~~ Community Development JL:jk Attach. ~~ ~~y P~f~~® ~~I~P~Edfl~'ION IISfi North Tustin Ruenue,Ordnge,Calilornia 9Zfifi7 17141633-7072 +fa rch 12, 1981 Mayor Philip D. Schlosser Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Mayor Schlosser and Council Members: We have an Agreement to Purchase the property fronting on Banyan presently owned by Dr. Rudy Ba ldoni, et al, and which comprises recorded Trac [s 9399 and 9400. It is our desire to proceed now with the orderly development of this property under the requirements and conditions precedent to the filing and record'Sng of the Final Maps and to execu [e a new Subdivision Agreement with your City. A thorough review of the approved design and street pa [te rns of Tract 9399 and 9400 shows all improvements to be fu Lly and desirably consistent with expressed satisfaction of Prado Woods L{omeowne rs for the past twelve years in regard to the highly favored traffic safety aspects of Cul-de-Sac streets. We. look forva rd to presenting our third and fourth Prado Home program in your eommuni ty and we desire your goodwill and support to our continuing endeavors. clrv oF~'eancMO cucanmttc„ COMiv;UIIITY OEVE'~ CP6SENi OEPL 1"AR 1 hLI Ohl PI! 71519110!11 1L''I1121314151Ii 3 ,,.:~;,, ~'~r ' %~ .~` `~ I' ~I~; y; f- I~1 ' .. ~ ~ Ii~i~J~w'W4 ~ ~ ~Y' - -~ ;~!I .,,.N ., :~~ ~ ` _ ,~ ~~11_ !!. ~_, ~ ~_. ~- :.--«: ~N.. iP ~~'PiiYP ~.- ~f 4 ~~x~,..~-~. _ _---~ ,amp - ,a- ~ P4N e 29E6 90.RT. = TWO•STORV [NTRI[8 h ~r.+ .eao Dome - ~- - ~ nv Pwlrc [xeN filnnl tf J - '"- evne ~w YN `".r •"~ aoxu• Nu ~a ~ I ~z ;'- ;~ 1 ~. `-'- • ~~~~~~~ Q , fftt I' ~~'~~ }~' ~w•RRROG„j YNYPN -------- -- ..~aN~ fux ,. ~~i .~ ,i ``!I, 1~~ ' M ~ fl ,""`:sue ~~..... ~i,l~ll ~Ci ~ T .uN Y4 ~~~;~ ALL _= . t • ~ .. ~rw ~u. .~ k.~', s ;~~,: ~~i {Fb ® A 30a] Sp rT ~'1 TWp•9TOflV ENTNIl9 ft ,R L • TO; UEONOOM[ ~ BaiNB ~' r[MNT p { x TCn[ ail0 N ^ 4 a9i NO M {aM ~; O Ol 4~w4E M NO n0 M ~ [ryC10Yf 9TEx fVli[ MCI • l~ tO I~CMI a4[ { {OMV91100M N „ ~~~/ I ..... ...~ x.• ]BOa SO.A. TWO.BTONV fNTH10 -1 ~ I ,.~y. • TO O [[OIIOOM[ f TO a {[iM[ ~ ~ ~ /~ ~ L _ _ A E ~~ _ b ~- ~~ ~ MMI[n NOOM MTIO ITCM[N T II' ~.~ ~r ', ~ fn4Mrx[T nOOM [{I1n[~T [~ IN~xO nOOM 4V1[N [[T!N [VIT[ } • J ~ NOM[M TUf 6{n0[M f/~TN {•TO •~Ca :O[n110f ~~M nw rum !+ty..•i~s' • {ONV[ [!n v r:~ ~.ia .. ... o ~..~ ..v .. .... .... ... ...~. I'a rch 12, 1981 City 1la na ger S:est End Cities San Eerna rd ino County C;entlemen: At the list meeting of N.ayors and Ifa na ga. rs held in .'o ntclai r, we 'mere directed to prepare a resolution urging the State Legislature not to divide cities into multiple state or federal elective districts, and to give strong consideration to economic and social ties within a region in establishing federal and state elective districts. Oral Lamp;aan did a typically outstanding job in drafting a resolu- • lion which I mana aed to slightly improve. Enclosed is a copy for our consideration y . Since the Senate Elections and Reapportionment Committee hearings will to k.e place on Pta rch 21 for San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, I would su gSest a resolution be adopted 6y each city, and that an elected representative be present at the upcoming hearing. The Assembly Elections and Reapportionment Committee hearings will take place on P.pril 9th, and the information on such hearings appears in the I;arch 6th Leeisla live Bulletin of the league of California Cities. Ora is contacting the cities on the east end of L.A. County with the same message. Sincerely, :r i L ~ John Cc rardi City 1•'a na 9er cr. Ora Lamps^.an, City of Po~~aona I'ic to el Milhiser, City of Montclair Lee Travers, City of Upland ao~Fr Hugh banks, City of On'.a rio ` '. ;ul'en !<d ss El`;3nCi ty of P. r. nc h0 Cuc6 raonga / ~~ Encl . I ~3 .., 1'... ...`~,.. ~. .., ,... .a i ~ Q.c. , cry .i li '~~11 iIf10:; '.71 ,8h: UiY ':'I;f 11. OF .16: !:I fY Uf iy^S'f) ,r; •;Si4; ::/tIi01J UI' -! Si'i° 'iii, i>:'1i %l''';3 fY _..:'.kIVS !:'. tSi'.'tl i`•'ii'•^> Il:f ~~i •JF i•1SiL1C15 ?9, J.c ~itins in U~c .,.,., jri.:iio :'al icy L::rc bad st~~c ..,: ;,; ~.:•d <r~cizl tics from ih;:ir 'ai rati on •: nd incorpo ration; ,nd ...,,. ;,5, tl, .,•_ ~~s 'c,~ not .. ',n rrst ric.ed by U,e f, i..n::y ~ ':ry ..Linn ,;r;:f r,s Los ,'~i:ncl es fo~:;oty cites ~~wn Szn :•_: n;: rdino Cv,nto ~ iti^s .:i t.,in the ., ~~;:/Cot... io :'alley; ar~d 1:.:.:":'~S, it is cast Lr: r.eiicial for cities •.vi th strong ties i, r, !•::e c~:~ ~.n SL~c ::~d F. :aral elective offi:re districts notwiLbs t.:ndi ng :; ..::ty !•o i.n :d r195, and !:'E'4 SS, it is c; nn ro re i~rportant that indivi'ual cities are not Cividvd Sato :.oitiple State. and elective office r!ist,icts to the disadean:ayz of t'r:e • loczl city electorate: .•,.>:, it1 f:RE i~,RE, 3E ]7 RE SOLVED that the City of CP~ir:o w~ges the State . ~agisl r'r,,re not to divide a city into mul ti of n. State or f„deral clecti ve districts ,:hen Lhere is a reasena ble and logical method of maintaining ;~oiitical •,:ni ty; and G= lT ,~'.;N iREP, f:r SC!.l'ED that the State Ir.gi stature give st, uccer considera~ion to the a..:~omic and social tins of r, rryion ir, ec izblisi~ing said fr~:aral and .. ~ .lice EistrJC is ti:en t0 cr:un ty b,u L?ari ~•s. ... ..,. 1'f.D ''',D GuCV lh.D iIIIS UFY OF _, 15F1. ' ~i L', 1'S2 L'F ..i= CI iY Ur Cri ffO, C,-'Jru%Iah . ' • ~: I' ..: • l dTY OF RANC1 I0 Q1G4MON(',A STAFF REPORT • March 12, 1981 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUH.IECT: Request For Pre-Sudget Study Session IC is requested [hat the City Council set an adjourned meeting, the purpose of which would be to diacuas with [he staff [he overall financial situation for the coming fiscal year. In addition [o diacuasing the severe budget limitations which are being faced by the City, Chia meeting will provide an opportunity for department heads to outline the programs with which they are working and also an opportunity for the City Council to suggest priorities for the coming fiscal year, As Council will recall, a similar meeting was scheduled last year. That meeting was productive for both the staff and the City Council members. LMW:baa (~~ -~/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ~VCnnip MEMORANDUM ~~° ~'~° cn o F V 2 U > 7977 TD: City Council FROM; Beverly Authelet The attached bonds were received too late to 6e included on the printed agenda. They are to be considered as Consent Calendar item g, '~I CITY OF RAI~E10 Cl,'CAM(a'~K,A STAFF REPORT GATE: March I8, 1981 T0: City Council and Ci [y Nanager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, Ci[y Engineer SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion Parcel Map 4869 - located on [he southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian OWNER: C/L, Inc. 521 No. Mountain Ave., Suite A Upland, California 91786 faithful Performance Bond (Road) $45,000 ;5 The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans and it is recommended that the Ci[y Council accept said improvements and authorize the Li [y Engineer [o file a Notice of Completion. Tract 9403 - located North of Highland and Eas[ of Mayberry OWNER: Olympus Pacific 2110 Kacella Avenue Anaheim, California 92803 The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with [he approved plans and it is recommended that the Ci [y Council accept said improvements and authorize [he Cify Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. ISespectfully sybmi l[ed, :blc Attachments RESOLUTION N0. ~~-.3 !{ A RESOLUTE ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP N0. 4869 AND TRACT 9403 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, [he construction of street improvements for Parcel Map 4869 and Tract 9403 have been completed [o the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is to 6e filed, certifying the work complete; NOW, THEREFORE, be i[ resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and [he Ci[y Engineer is authorized [o sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County for Parcel Map 4869 and Tract 9403. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, Ci[y Ll erk CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: pARCEL MAP 4869 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320-C Baseline Road, Post Office Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California'91730. 3. On the 18ch day of March 1981, there was com- pleted on the hereinafter described real property the work of im- provement set forth in the contract documents for STREET IMPROVEMENTS 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of im- provement as a whole was C/L, Inc., 521 N. Mountain Ave., Upland, Ca. 91786 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Covnty of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: PARCEL MAP 4869 The street address of said property is: DATED: , 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner BY: (Name) Lloyd B. Hubbs (Title) Ci[y Engineer -1- C1 TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Post Office Hox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: TRACT 9403 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9320-C Baseline Road, Post Office Sox 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the Igth day of March 1481, there was com- pleted on the hereinafter described real property the work of im- provement set forth in the contract documents for STREET IMPROVEMENTS 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of im- provement as a whole was Olympus Pacific Corporation 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: TRACT 9403 The street address of said property is: DATED: , 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner eY: (Name) Lloyd B. Hubbs (Title) Ci [y Engineer -1- V MEMORANDUM v March 17, 1981 T0: City Manager City Council FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Mana gerL,'>Q/ SUBJECT: Chamber of Commerce Request far A Fi rVVeworks' Stand - 1981 As you are aware, the City has received a request from the Chamber of Commerce to consider modifying the City's eligibility requirements to obtain a permit 'to operate a Fireworks Stand. Current Council policy was adopted by minute action March 21, 1979 (see attached minutes) and established the following policy: 1. One fireworks stand per 10,000 population. 2. Accept staff's recommendation to establish a rotation system for fssua nce of permits with qualifying organization being added to the list each year. In addition, to establish a random drawing to determine the order of priority for the original list. 3. All monies be turned back into the community. 4. Fifty-one percent of an organization's membership to be residents of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. Be a non-profit organization with certificate on file with the State and to present this as proof of organization's status. 6. Limit drawing of first applicants to the ones currently on file. The ones not drawn this year will be on the list first next year. All new applications be added to the bottom of list in order of receipt. Those having stands this year to 6e placed at the end of list. In addition, the City adopted Ordinance No. 78 in May of 1979 which established regulations affecting the Storage, Use and Sale of Safe and Sane Fireworks. Should Council wish to consider expanding the eligibility requirements to include the Chamber of Commerce, there are several companion issues that the City Council may or may not wish to consider: Continued..... March 17, 1981 Page Two Chamber of Commerce Request for Fireworks Stand 1. First of all, it would not 6e necessary to adopt a new Ordinance, Nothing in Ordinance No. 178 limits the number of stands permitted or prescri 6es eligibility requirements for qualified groups. Council would merely revise its policy by minute action. 2. Expanding the eligibility requirements to include the Chamber of Commerce in 1981 would be counter to the existing policy where qualified groups rotate from bottom to toD• Our current list of "eligible" groups extends into 1984. Although there is no formal commitment to any of these groups, it might raise thier ire if the Chamber is allowed to have a stand for 1981. 3. If Council commits to the Chamber, it might consider expanding the number of stands from five to six and consider the Chamber separately from the other service clubs and charitable groups. 4. Does the City Council wish to consider excluding single purpose groups, such as Boy Scouts, Sons of Italy, Women's Club, etc. and restrict stands to local service organizations. If Council wishes to honor the current group requests on file, a sunset clause could be established and begin with new eligibility requirements in 1985. 5, Consider the position that the Chamber of Commerce has other means of raising funds that are not available to charitable groups, service clubs, etc., and not expand the number of stands or eligibility requirements at this time, 6. Allow those groups who have permits for 1981 to sell in July and re-evaluate the existing policy at a later date after the City Staff has received Tnput, concerns, direction for revT ew, etc. from the City Council. .~ JR/vz C1[y Louncll Minutes Match 31, 1919 Page 8 HISTORICAL Wugher[y pe Sneed ouc that the snob ling sec cfon mould apply ORDtNA.KE [o all appl lcatlons under [he e[d inance. Sn certain cir- uastances Council might van[ to have a filing fee and chec Ordinance Council would have the paver co set fees by a Reaoluc ion No. Jo once the ordinance vas established. (ff rat [eading) Motion: Moved by Nlke la, seconded by Pelombo [a approve (continued) Ordinance No. ]0 with changes fn Sec[fon ]8 {b) and (d), sec Ap c11 4 for second reading, and wive entire reading. motion onanlmovaly carried. ORDINANCE N0. ]0 AN ORDTNANCE OF TN¢ CIIY CWNGIL OF THE CITY OF MNCNO NCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN NSSTORIL PRESERVATION CDt4fIESION 1'0 ALT IN AOVtEOftY CAPACITY TO CITY COUNCIL 3N THE SDEMIFICAtION AND P0.EREAVA- ~ TIOV OP NI STOAICAL OBJECTS, EVEMS, gIRllCNREg ANO SITES ANO TO IDEMIR PERSONS OP RISTORICAL SIGNI- PICAYCE To THE CITY OF RANNe LLCAtpNGA. ' COOPEMTION A ewpe[atiw agreemin[ vl ch stn Rerwrdiw County mhich AGREEIEM deals inch publlciy awned hauaing uni[a vtthing the City OF GDMMUNItt of Rancho Cucamonga. Phil Rush few the Of (ice of Comeunlcy DEVELOPMEM Development, gars Berna[d ino County, addressed [owcil. Council ewaideted what Ne benefice weld be to [he efty ' opposed to doing this ourselves. Mr. flush Doinced ouc [he cl ty had no Housing Authorf ty of its mm and only an Homing Authority vex approved to apply foe these available funds. Mike is expressed that a great deal o[ time wet into ~ mubltshing Ne three edap cod elements of the General r Plan and can faxesee same type of effort going into [he 1 Nom tnq Element. N< stated ue should develop chla fasvc ` before rushing into a decision with the Gouncy. ' Motion: Moved by Mikeie, seconded by Pelombo to direct [M1is to acaEE to explore the kinds of alternaclv<e chat vailable [e Rancho Cucamonga end hw a eanalderatien mf thla Seem could be integrated loco <onefderatian of the Housing Elennt Eor the General Plan. Hotfon wean lmouc ly carried. Co!q tTTEE _ 1. Advisory Committee - Chuck august, LTairnan, for [ha REPORTS Cucamonga gubcomml [tel, aald [he Advisory Conmic[eea' main concern v s seerm d[atm uh ich mould be reported on letec. They had been w[king on the sign acd inance and ) were nw mocking on some o[hec items with ateff. Meecinga ace an third Thursdays each month in the Llb racy. ]. Hf stori cal Commission -Leonard Gorczyca, Acting Chairman, stated [hoc to answer quest Iona which were heinR asked about alters which have been named of his to clean '~ importance, the next step will be to take these aicea one establish an inventory Sn accocdance with the p[eac ribed farm and ev[llne by the Otace. Then the lfat will be nubmi[[ed [o the City Count (1 vhe will be final authority on destg- nettona. CFIRf6ORRN ~ L Jim Robinson, Assls[anc m [he CS[y Manager, preaen Led [he t ff c s a roper[. Staff re ummenda[ton to Council vex: °Es [ahlish a raca[ton system for feauance of permits. Quali([ed organtxa[fons avoid be added to [he lase each year. In adJlefen, the Gt [y Council mold cone (der a ran- dom droving or lottery to determine ehc order of priority [vr this orl gtnnl its[. Those qualt[fe2 organlzatfone that recet ve tlcenees each year weld rotate co the bottom of the list anJ move up the Ilse as licensee are leaved each year. Upon written req vex [,gvallf led organlzaclona ' mould be added to the llac each year." ', 1 City Cvuncfl tlf notes March 21, 19)9 Page 9 PIRRt+ORK$ those speaking on the isaueverr. ~Ecen[Snued) Phil Tub it lo, Sens vE I[a ly, emphasf zed tbis v s non-profit organization and should love apart Sv the pregrem. E.P. Guerra, Cucamonga Men's Service Club, favored the ro cation basis of selection. Bill ptelend-Vineynre Llee le league, favored the roeaeion basis of selection. Bill Crif [itM1, Rancho Cueemanga Kfmanla, Sn favor of the staff's recomzendacions. Also suggmted limiting irevorka booths m non-pcof is aervtce organixacfov that you ld tom monies generated fn tM11e fund rafa ing of foa back into [he city for she betterment of she city. Ron Baatvright - Boy Bcout Troop 641, favored the grand- £ache[ clause end felt more boocM might be considered. Chuck Bugvet, Hiss Sof cball America, expnaseA they wvld be able to u any mney in developing flelda since there is a lack of fields in town. John Rose, Cl crua Little League, tel[ sonde should be Riven on basis of needs. peat expceaaed he wind like co see any money <amed rtay vitM1fn the communi cy. Moll on: Moved by MSkels, s onded by Heat and unani- wualy carried [hate aheuldebe as [allwa: 1. One fireworks stand pct 10,000 population. 2. Accept staff's r endacfen to es tabliah a - eatien eys tam foe lssmnce oP permits with qualify- ing organizat iov being added to the ltec each ye: t. In add ltlon, co establ laM1 a antlom drnYng fo dete[mfne the order of priority for the on gfnal list. ]. A31 monies be turned back Into the coomrunicy. 4. Fifty-one percent of a organization's membership eo be residence of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. Be anon-prefft organt zatten vi th cart Sflcate on file v¢h the gtate and to present this es proof eE organ L-a[lon'e status. 6. LSmft drawing a[ t3 nt apPlicante to the a ur rently on [Sle. The ones not drawn ehle year of 11 be on the itst Efnt nett yes Ali n apPltca[tona be added ro [he bo [tom of lis[cn order of receipt. these havtng amnde [his year to be pla<ee et [he end eE lts c. gTnR`I ORA C:- Mr. Naaaermen sta [ed that since the last ceuncll meettn6, SYST F45 FFE ata Ef had met on No ocnaa tons with [M1e represen[a[lven of [he 1nJ us[r1a1 c ivnun tty vt[h the assistance of the Clamber o[ Canme rte help ln6 [o tae rd ins to she effort. A meeting, vh[r.h vas he1J this site noon, vas for the put oose of 1nJ icacinp [o the c unity the extent of [lood control problems en [hemeity and [eeionele (or alai( and Advt sorv Cownt[[ceb rx commendations to Cuun<tl fur the storm Jra Sn Eee ordinance. Mr. Nubbs, Cicy F.ngt near, gave a verviev o[ atom deafn . neeJS In the city ml[h some approxlma to costa. Ken pil ll s. Building As sec fatlon tndus[ry, indlca cad [he BiA fe if there vas an Sni ua[LCe vi th tha gya tam Bove lapment fees. He tel[ [ha[ iE ouch • fee wen imposed, Council show td nke into cons lde ntfon: . ~„ !§Tl) !1L O A I~YI V\ !R 1(~A ANl1~Y` A lAl ~11 a_~.IL Vltl Rr` March 12, 1981 T0: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUH.TECT: Request for Pre-Budget Study Session I[ is requested that the City Council eet an adjourned meeting, the purpose of which would be to discuss with the staff the overall financial situation for the coming fiscal year. In addition to discussing the severe budget limitations which are being faced by the Ci[y, this meeting will orovide an opportunity for department heads to outline the programs with which they are working and also an opportunity for the City Council [o suggest priorities far the coming fiscal year. As Council will recall, a similar meeting was scheduled last year. That meeting was productive for both the staff and [he City Council members. LMW:baa r ~~ City of RANCHO ~UCA MONGA February 10, 1981 Alden N. Godfrey Inland Empire Cultural Poundation 11161 Santo Antonio Drive Suite S Colton, California 92324 Dear Mr. Godfrey: Thank you For your letter to Mayor Schlosser which has been referred to me for a response. In order to be placed on the City Council agenda, it would be appreciated if you would contact the Deputy City Clerk, Beverly Authelet. She will make certain your request ie placed on the City Council agenda. The Rancho Cucamonga Ciiy Council meets on [he first end third Wednesday of each month. The deadline for submission of agenda materials is the Wednesday one week prior to the meeting date. In addition, we would like to have sufficient time for our staff to review the proposed document before !t is sent to the City Council. In order to make certain that your organization is fully apprised of [he cultural needs of our community, I would suggest that you contact our Com- munity Services Director, William Holley. Mr. Holley will be available to assist you and to answer any questions you may have. Sincerely, L~. Was City Manager LNIJ: bas cc: William Volley City Council POST OFFICE BOX 807. RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 • 1714) 989-7861 r r~ 1~: ~' -- 9~AOn d nn nn. ,v 9oext, ~~ ,~~ ~//.,.1{/ / /1'~/ February 4, 1981 Mayor Fhillip D, Schlosser City Hall 9320 Base Line Road / Unit C Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mayor Schlosser: The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation has been retained by the San Bernardino County Hoard of Supervisors under con- tract to conduct an assessment of needs in the field of cultural arts and, from this, develop a countywide compre- hensive arts plan. This is being done under a grant from the California Arts Council as part of its State/Local Partnership Program. We are already well on our way in this project and you may already be familiar with it from previous contacts and/or publicity. tPe are having a series of public meetings to elicit input in the last two weeks of February. The plan will be presented to the Board of Supervisors as well as to each of the City Councils for review, comment, and approval. [t is our hope to complete the writing of the plan by the First week of March and mail or deliver it 6y March 9th. The California Arts Council has set a deadline of March 31st to receive it in Sacramento. [NLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION 11181 Scnto Antonio Ddrq Su1tc J, Colton, Cnltfomt~ 9E884 (714) BC4-0Y4/1 r February 4, 1981 Page Two Would you please advise what is necessary for us to do to place the plan before your Council in time for it to review it prior to the Council's deadline. I apologize for the tightness of the time schedule. It is, unfortunately, not within my control. Thank you for your unde r.s[anding and cooperation. Sincerely yours, INLAND E~ML.PyI.`JR.~EIjr+C-U~LTURAL FOUNDATION ~~ I V Alden N. Godfrey Executive Director ANC/bjt !) ~c A CW,.,., erne Nme.YM 9•~~ M LLe A,b ,. s.,n> March 10, 1981 Ms. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager/Clerk City Hall 9320 Sase Line Road, Unit C ua~rhn cucamonca. California, 91730 Dear Ms. Wasserman: The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation has been designated by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors to undertake a Needs Assessment and, from it, develop a proposed Compre- hensive Countywide Arts Plan. This project has now been completed and copies of it have been, or will be, presented to the various City Councils of incorporated cities in our county. When the report is submitted to the California Arts Council in Sacramento (the deadline for that is March 31st) it must be accompanied by wfiat the Council calla Public Arts Expenditure Forms. These forms were previously sent to cities and school districts directly by the Council with an explanatory letter. Unfortunately, neither the Council nor this organization has any record that you have returned those forms. We enclose another one (or set, if appropriate) which we urge you to fill out and have signed and return to us as rapidly as possible. INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION 11181 Smto Antanlo Onvc, Smt< ], Cotton. GLfomin 98884 (714) 88468b Ms. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager/Clerk City Hall March 10, 1981 Page Two Where we have been advised verbally of the appropriate fig- ure, we have filled it in. Since the acceptance of this report should mean additional money coming into San Bernardino County to support arts activities here, and since the March 31st deadline is loom- ing ever closer, we ask you to act on this as rapidly as possible. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely yours, INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION Alden N. Godfrey Executive Director Enclosure ANG/bjt ~~ ~:. :::.~ ~,~ r STATE/LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY AND COMPREHENSIVE COUNTYWIDE ARTS PLAN CONDUCTED BY: INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION UNDER A GRANT FROM: CALIFORNIA ARTS COUNCIL JANUARY - MARCH, 1981 ___ ~ ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER Section 1 The Background 1_'2 Section 2 The Planning Agency 3-5 Section 3 The Area-San Hesnardino County 6-8 Section 4 The Needs Assessment Part I Questionnaires and Interviews 9-27 Section 5 The Needs Assessment Part II Public Meetings 28-41 Section 6 The Needs Assessment Part ZII Needs and Goa le 42-48 Section 7 The Future - Recommendations 49-56 ~ ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NUMBER Appendix A The Questionnaire I-V Appendix H Expenditures on Cultural Arts Programs by Cities VI-VII Appendix C Expenditures on Cultural Arts Programs by County VIII Appendix ~ Listing of Educational Institutions IX-XII Appendix E Available (Large) Facilities XIII-XVII Appendix F Organi2ations Participating in Survey Interviews and Questionnaires XVIII-XXIII Appendix G Population by Race, Sex, and Age XXIV Appendix H Civilian Labor Farce by Aace, Sex, and Age XXV Appendix I Survey of Buying Power XXVI-XXVII Appendix J The Media XXVIII-XXX Appendix X Board of Directors of the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation XXX I-XXXIII ~ ~ SECTION 1 THE BACKGROUND The State/Local Partnership Program was established by the California Arts Council and the State Legislature to encourage local cultural planning and decision-making and to reach pre- viously underserved constituencies. As defined by the Council, the objectives of the program are: 1. To provide a mechanism for more effective Local arts planning and to coordinate such planning with state programs. 2. To develop rural and suburban areas which have not fully participated in arts programs. 3. To expand the private sector support for arts at the local level. 4. To give local government agencies the opportunity to assist the California Arts Council in improving the efficiency of arts programming. 5. To provide a more stable base of support for the arts at the local level. 6. To provide a potential decentralization mechanism for other California Arts Council programs. 7. To prevent duplication and overlap between Federal (administered through the Council), State and Local program funds. 8. To provide for increased employment of artists. 9. To stimulate the local economy. To achieve--or, as the Council puts it, to actualize--these objectives, the Council designated $1,100,000.00 to the pro- gram. 1 ~ ~ THE BACKGROUND (CONTINUED) Each county was given a bloc grant of $12,000.00, either to spend itself through an agency of its own or to give to a designated agency. With this the agency was to undertake a countywide needs assessment and, based upon these identified and prioritized needs, to develop a comprehensive countywide arts plan. The agency designated by the Board of Supervisors in San Bernardino County for this project was the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation. And this is the report and plan it has developed and here- with presents. ~ ~ SECTION 2 THE PLANNING AGENCY The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation was formed in the spring and summer of 1980 as, generally speaking, a "united Way for the arts." It designates as its service area the "metropolitan areas of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties." It should be noted that this constitutes the fourth largest metropolitan area in the State of California and the twenty-fifth largest in the entire nation. However, wisely, in its incorporation the founders of the Foundation specifically provided for expansion into "such other adjacent areas" as determined by the Board of Directors with the intent, eventually, of servicing all of both counties. In its Statement of Purpose the Foundation declares that it "exists to unite arts organizations, donors, community and business leaders, and the communities themselves in a common effort to advance, support, and enhance the cultural arts programs, services, and activities of the people in the area it serves. "We believe that arts are both a community concern and an individual responsibility of each citizen and that support of the arts is best accomplished through a planned and business- like approach. "TO that end, the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation will pro- mote unity of action among community leaders and other volunteers, prospective donors (business and individual), governmental units, and aris organizations. Fund-raising will be on an areawide basis and progressively each year more inclusive of prospective corporate contributors, local businesses, governmental entities, foundations, professional organizations, interested individual donors, and other speci- fied groups. "The objective of the fund-raising effort is to provide a balanced program of cultural arts presented 6y affiliated organizations, governed by their own boards, who have joined ~ ~ THE PLANNING AGENCY (CONTINUED) in this coordinated undertaking to conserve time and effort, reduce cost and duplication, and to raise urgently needed funds in a more efficient and effective manner. Those organi- zations receiving funds from the Inland Empire Cultural Founda- tion are expected not to solicit supporters of the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation. "The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation accepts the stewardship responsibility which comes with solicited funds to see that they are fairly allocated and intelligently spent. The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation will also encourage, through funding, development of programs to meet unmet cultural needs in our area." In its initial fund-raising campaign, conducted simultaneously with its organization, the Foundation was extremely success- ful, raising some 116 per cent of its initial goal. Future campaigns are planned for April and May and organi- zation already is well underway for the 1981 effort. The Board of Directors of the Foundation, all of whom serve without reimbursement, are listed in this report as Appendix K. The officers of the Foundation are: President: William Honeysett, Publisher, San Bernardino Sun. Vice President: Mrs. Sharon Hodgdon, San Bernardino Businesswoman and civic leader. Treasurer: Les Richter, President, Riverside International Raceway. Secretary: J. Edward Harp, President, Redlands Federal Savings and Loan Aasocia tion. The executive director of the Foundation is Alden Godfrey. Mr. Godfrey is a past executive director of COMBO (Combined Arts and Education Council of San Diego County, probably the most successful arts council in California) as well as ~ ~ THE PLANNING AGENCY (CONTINUED) several United Ways. As a volunteer, he is a past president of the Alliance of California Arts Councils (ACAC) and a vice president of the California Confederation of the Arts. Mr. Godfrey served as the project director for this State/ Local Partnership Program study. He is, therefore, the primary author of this study and report. In both the needs assessment and/or the preparation of the report he was assisted by: James Hardesti, Public Relations Director of the Foundation. Bonnie Taylor, Executive Secretary of the Foundation. Julia Hester. Jean Wright. Dr. David Shichor. Mmes. Hester and {fright are sociology students at California State College, San Bernardino, who undertook assisting in this project as their semester's work. Dr. Shichor, their faculty advisor, generously participated in numerous planning and review meetings. 5 SECTION 3 THE AREA-SAN BERNARDZNO COUNTY There is one salient point about San Bernardino County that should be constantly kept in mind: it is the largest count rL, areati ise, in the United States. It is 20,189 square miles big. It is 725 square miles larger than the combined states of Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island. This immense size, in itself, creates problems which are not even considered in arts progranuning in, for example, a county the size of San Francisco. Needles, an incorporated city in San Bernardino County, is some 235 miles fzom the county seat. Even the greatest symphony .in the world per- forming regularly in San Bernardino would attract few music lovers from Needles, given the ten-hour driving time to and from their home to the site of the concerts. Yet eighty per cent of the county's population lives in 27~ per cent of the land area. Population figures on cities and details of "populaton centers" aze provided in Section 5. Appendix G provides details on Total Population by Race, Sex, and Aqe. Appendix H provides details on the Civilian Labor Force by Race, Sex, and Age. Appendix I provides details on Buying Power. There are some other interesting--and, perhaps, significant-- factors relating to the arts in San Bernardino County that should at least be noted here. 1. Few arts organizations in San Bernardino County recognize and/or understand the grants programs of the California Arts Council. This, presumably, would also extend to other grants programs by other funding entities as well. 6 r , THE AREA-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (CONTINUED) 2. Last year not one single arts organization in all of metropolitan San Bernardino even bothered to apply to the California Arts Council for a grant. 3. Last year only one arts organization (Redlands Art Organization) in all of San Bernardino County received a grant from the Council...and that for only $900.C0. A. For purposes of its Regional Technical Assistance Pro- gram, the California Arts Council divides the State of California into eight regions. San Bernardino County (along with Riverside, Imperial, and Inyo Counties) is Region VI. In 1979, no arts organization in the entire region even bothered to apply for the $25,000.00 grant that was there for the asking. So, obviously, there has been little technical assistance available to San Bernardino County arts agencies. a. It should be noted that Lhe California Arts Council has, at long last, funded an agency in the four'county area to provide technical assistance this year. The C uncil selected an organization that is, essentially, an arm of the City of River- side and, as such, is housed in Riverside City Hall. In view of the long-standing rivalry land, in some cases, ill will) between the two counties this choice has surprised some local arts leaders. It does seem possible that some "neutral" entity-- not one a quasi-agency of a governmental body in either county--would have been a Less contentious designee. In consideration of all of the foregoing, perhaps this one sentence summary tells it all: San Bernardino County is a very large area with a rapidly growing population which is, essentially, inadequately served by a number of financially-weak arts oxganizations which have been almost completely neglected, for whatever reason, by the California Arts Council over the years. This summary sentence is not to condemn the Council; certainly the arts organizations in San Bernardino County are at least partially to blame Eor their own neglect. THE AREA-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (CONTINUED) However, with the organization of, and the initial success by, the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation and with the establishment of the Council's State/Local Partnership Pro- gram, the future for San Bernardino County arts organizations does look brighter. ! i SECTION 4 THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I 4UESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS The initial public step in undertaking the Needs Assessment from which will be developed the Comprehensive Countywide Arts Plan was the preparation of a questionnaire (Appendix A ), This was widely distzibuted, along with return envelopes, to arts organizations, civic organizations, service clubs, Chambers of Consnerce, senior citizen groups, ethnic and minority organizations, youth groups, churches, women's clubs, numerous other groups and organizations, and an equally wide range of individuals. At the same time the questionnaires were distributed, a series of personal interviews were scheduled with various individuals selected for their leadership positions in arts and civic affairs. The basic information contained in the questionnaires that were returned, and from the interviews, was culled, recorded statistically, and was used in the establishment of prioritized goals detailed in Section 6. However, for consideration, a summary questionnaire was pre- pared for each community and/oz "population center" containing a compilation of the replies to some of the questions. They follow, along with some comments. ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES BARSTOW AREA ORGANIZATIONS Where are your organization's cultural activities held? Own Facility 33 per cent School Auditoriums 28 per cent Churches 5 per cent Community Center 23 per cent Other 11 per cent Do the present facilities meet current needs? Yes 27 per cent No 73 per cent Will the present facilities meet future needs? Yes No 10 per cent 90 per cent Does your organization currently have available equipment with which to offer a full range of activities? Yes No 42 per cent 58 per cent Do you believe your organization's activities are being locally duplicated to a considerable degree by other organi- zations? Yea No 18 per cent 82 per cent What is your organization's total budget? For last fiscal year $ 2,722.00 average For current fiscal year $ 5,693.00 average What percentage of your budget is used for Management Progranoning 22 per cent 78 per cent 10 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES (CONTINUED) BARSTOW AREA INDIVIDUALS Are the facilities in your community adequate for cultural aCtlVltieS? Yes No 32 per cent 68 per cent Are the community's present facilities adequate to meet future needs? Yes No 22 per cent 78 per cent List, in order of importance, cultural activities not cur- rently offered that you would like to have in your community: Performing Arts Music/Opera Dance Lectures Visual Arts Children's Programs Would you like to have cultural activities brought into the community from other areas? Yes No 94 per cent 6 per cent 11 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS COMMENTS BARSTOW AREA In the 6arstow area most cultural activities seem to revolve around school facilities, whether those at the college or in the elementary and secondary schools. (However, these are generally described by the organizations using them as some- what inadequate now and certainly so for future undertakings.) Consequently the recurring cry for "adequate facilities" is heard once more in the land...this time from the high desert. Also, and this is hardly surprising, ninety-four per cent of the individuals replying and/or interviewed expressed a wish to see cultural activities brought into the area. (This con- trasts markedly with Redlands, for example, where that same wish was expressed by only twenty-seven per cent. Obviously people who live in Redlands have greater access to cultural activities than those living in Barstow and, therefore, see less need for importing it.) 12 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART Z (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES REDI.ANDS AREA ORGANIZATIONS Where are your organization's cultural activities held? Own Facility 50 per cent School Auditoriums 20 per cent Churches 10 per cent Community Center 10 per cent Other 10 per cent Do the present facilities meet current needs? Yes 17 per cent No 83 per cent Will the present facilities meet future needs? Yes 14 per cent No 86 per cent Does your organization currently have available equipment with which to offer a full range of activities? No 100 per cent Do you believe your organization's activities are being locally duplicated to a considerable degree by other organi- zations? No 100 per cent What is your organization's total budget? For last fiscal year $ 21,750.00 average For current fiscal year $ 21,040.00 average What percentage of your budget is used for Management 59 per cent Programming 41 per cent 13 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I ICONTINDED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES (CONTINUED) REDLANDS AREA INDIVIDUALS Are the facilities in your community adequate for cultural activities? Yes No 25 per cent 75 per cent Are the community's present facilities adequate to meet future needs? Yes No 22 per cent 78 per cent List, in order of importance, cultural activities not cur- rently offered that you would like to have in your community: Visual Arts Youth Programs Performing Arts Music Exhibits/Lectures Would you like to have cultural activities brought into the community from other areas? Yes No 27 per cent 73 per cent 14 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS COMMENTS REDLANDS AREA Redlands, for a community its size, appears to be compara- tively well serviced by several well-financed and well- organized cultural arts organizations. Certainly there is no dearth of willing volunteers. However, as is true elsewhere, there is a recurring demand for construction of a cultural center. Perhaps because of the regular productions at the Redlands Eowl and at the University, there is not the usual high demand for performing arts that appears in other communities. The cultural activity most cited as not currently being offered is "visual arts." As a broad generalization, Redland residents appear to be better satisfied with the cultural activities that presently exist in their community than is true elsewhere. However, surprisingly, there is a frequent comment in the question- naires that cultural activities in Redlands sometimes lack "quality." 15 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNE- QUESTIONNAIRES SAN BERNARDINO METROPOLITAN AREA (EXCLUDING REbLANDS) OAGANI2ATIONS Where are your organization's cultural activities held? Own Facility 40 per cent School Auditoriums 17 per cent Churches 4 per cent Coimnunity Center 23 per cent Other 16 per cent Do the present facilities meet current needs? Yes 43 per cent No 57 per cent Will the present facilities meet future needs? Yes 38 per cent No 62 per cent Does your organization currently have available equipmeht with which to offer a full range of activities? No 100 per cent Do you believe your organization's activities are being locally duplicated to a considerable degree by other organi- zations? No 100 per Cent What is your organization's total budget? For Last fiscal year 5 7,239.00 average For current fiscal year $ 5,359.00 average What percentage of your budget is used for Management Programming 13 per cent 87 per cent 16 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES (CONTINUED) SAN EERNARDINO METROPOLITAN AREA (EXCLUDING REDLANDS) INDIVIDUALS Are the facilities in your community adequate for cultural activities? Yes No 21 per cent 79 per cent Are the community's present facilities adequate to meet future needs? Yes No 13 per cent 87 per cent List, in order of importance, cultural activities not cur- rently offered that you would like to have in your community: Performing Arts Music/Opera Exhibits/Museums Visual Arts Dance Arts and Crafts/Workshops Would you like to have cultural activities brought into the community from other areas? Yes No 81 per cent 19 per cent 17 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS COMMENTS SAN BERNARDINO AREA Despite the fact that San Bernardino is a large city by al- most any definition, its cultural organizations are definitely under-financed as evidenced by their average budgets. It is particularly important to note that the average budget for the current fiscal year is sharply reduced from last year's average budget. There is no single explanation for this. However, despite the low level of financing, San Bernardino arts organizations attract dedicated and diligent volunteers who supplement the minimal staffs utilized. This is par- ticularly evident when you note the surprisingly low percen- tage of agency budgets expended on "management." Even the twenty-one per cent of re spondants who believe facilities are adequate for current cultural activities shrinks to only thirteen per cent when "future needs" are considered. The major demands expressed (echoing the subsequent public meeting) were for a cultural center, and for refurbishing of present facilities. By far the single greatest demand expressed in the returns was for a Cultural Center...achieved either through con- struction of a new one or through refurbishing of present facilities, e.g. the Municipal Auditorium. 18 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES VICTORVILLE AREA ORGANIZATIONS Where are your organization's cultural activities held? Own Facility 30 pez cent School Auditoriums 30 per cent Churches 20 pez cent Community Center 20 per cent Other 0 Do the present facilities meet current needs? No 100 per cent Will the present facilities meet future needs? No 100 per cent Does your organization currently have available equipment with which to offer a full range of activites? No 100 per cent Do you believe your organization's activities are being Locally duplicated to a considerable degree by other organizations? Yes 22 per cent No 78 per cent What is your organization's total budget? For last fiscal year $ 9,947.00 average For current fiscal year $ 9,867.00 average What percentage of your budget is used for Management Programming 27 per cent 73 per cent 19 THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES (CONTINUED) VICTORVILLE AREA INDIVIDUALS Are the facilities in your community adequate for cultural activities? Yes No 25 per cent 75 per cent Are the community's present facilities adequate to meet future needs? Yes No 13 per cent 87 per cent List, in order of importance, cultural activities not cur- rently offered that you would like to have in your community: Music/Opera Performing Arts Exhibits Visual Arts Youth Programs Arts and Craf is/Workshops Would you like to have cultural activities brought into the community from other areas? Yes 100 per cent 20 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSM.ENT_PART I (CONTINUED) SlUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS COMMENTS VICTORVILLE AREA Victorville is about to have its first performing arts center, a new 500-seat ediface under construction at Victor Valley Community College. It would be interesting to see, a year from now with the new center in operation, whether the ex- pression of needs would change noticably as a result. However, the questionnaires from organizations returned now indicate universal dissatisfaction with current facilities both now arid, certainly, in the future. On the other hand, individuals are somewhat kinder in their assessment of the, presumably, same facilities. A quarter of them, twenty-five per cent, believe they are currently adequate and thirteen per cent are not even concerned with the future. There were three recurring comments, each appearing often enough to merit listing here: 1. Lack of cultural activities generally in both the desert and nearby mountain areas. 2. The need to travel considerable distances to attend cultural activities elsewhere. 3. The lack of any "variety" in cultural stimulation... since so much local activity was described as being "arts and crafts." 21 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES WEST END AREA Where are your organization's cultural activities held? Own facility 39 per cent School Auditoriums 17 per cent Churches 6 per cent Community Center 16 per cent Other 22 per cent Do the present facilities meet current needs? Yes 27 per cent No 73 per cent Will the present facilities meet future needs? Yes 20 per cent No 80 per cent Does your organization currently have available equipment with which to offer a full range of activities? Yes No 36 per cent 64 per cent Do you believe lour organization's activities are beiny locally duplicated to a considerable degree by other organi- zations? Yes 18 per cent No 82 per cent What is your organization's total budget? For last fiscal year $ 8,883.00 average For current fiscal year $ 9,915.00 average What percentage of your budyet is used for Management Programming 18 per cent 82 per cent 22 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES (CONTINUED) WEST END AREA INDIVIDUALS Are the facilities in your community adequate for cultural activities? Yes No 38 per cent 62 per cent Are the community's present facilities adequate to meet future needs? Yes No 17 per cent 83 per cent List, in order of importance, cultural activities not cur- rently offered that you would like to have in your community: Senior Citizen Programs Children's Theatre/Workshops Art Shows/Classes Performing Arts Music/Opera Wovld you like to have cultural activities brought into the community from other areas? Yes No 40 per cent 60 per cent 23 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS COMMENTS WEST END AREA Residents in the West End, to some considerable degree, look across the border of Los Angeles County for satisfaction of at lease some of their cultural needs in such locations as the Claremont Colleges. However, few questionnaires came back from the West End that did not contain pleas for (1) the construction of an adequate performing arts center, and/or (2) the extensive modification of various existing facilities in the several cities of the West End. There were also frequent complaints on the inadequate public transportation in the area, especially inter-city. Although demographic statistics do not show an unusually large number of senior citizens in the Weat. End, individuals responding to the questionnaire made "senior citizen programs" the number one priority in what they termed "cultural activities not currently offered." (Interestingly enough, this question hardly came up in the subsequent public meet- ing held in the West End despite the presence of a number of senior citizens in the audience.) 24 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMMARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES YUCCA VALLEY AREA ORGANIZATIONS Where are your organization's cultural activities held? Own facility 33 per cent School Auditoriums 14 per cent Churches 12 per cent Community Center 27 per cent Other 14 per cent Do the present facilities meet current needs? Yes 17 per cent No 83 per cent Will the present facilities meet future needs? No 100 per cent Does your organization currently have available equipment with which to offer a full range of activities? No 100 per cent Do you believe your organization's activities are being locally duplicated to a considerable degree by other organi- zations? No 100 per cent What is your organization's total budget? For last fiscal year * $ 32,000.00 average For current fiscal year $ 68,830.00 average *(mostly government money) What percentage of your budget is used for Management Programming 44 per cent 56 per cent 25 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS SUMNARY OF RETURNED QUESTIONNAIRES (CONTINUED) YUCCA VALLEY AREA INDIVIDUALS Are the facilities in your community adequate for cultural activities? Yes No 37 per cent 63 per cent Are the community's present facilities adequate to meet future needs? Yes No 12 per cent 88 per cent List, in order of importance, cultural activities not currently offered that you would like to have in your community: Music Performing Arts Exhibits Would you like to have cultural activities brought into the community from other areas? Yes 100 per cent 26 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I (CONTINUED) QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS COMMENTS YUCCA VALLEY AREA Two things immediately leap out in reviewing questionnaires returned from the organizations in the Yucca Valley area. First, almost no one (seventeen per cent) believe present facilities meet current needs. Secondly, no one at all believes these present facilities will meet future needs. This conviction changes slightly when returns from individuals are considered. Then, thirty-seven per cent believe present facilities are adequate but this falls to twelve per cent when future needs are considered. Another interesting note: every respondant believed cultural activities should be brought into the cononun ity from other areas. IIn most other communities, even those with rela- tively little cultural activity, there were at least a hand- ful of residents reluctant to see anything "imported" from elsewhere.) 27 ~ ~ SECTION S THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II PUBLIC MEETINGS A major source of public input for this study was a series of public meetings held throughout San Bernardino County in the last two weeks of February. Since it would be manifestly impossible to conduct such a meeting in every community in the county, considerable attent- ion was given to where such meetings should be held to attract the greatest number of people to a central location. Eventually it was determined to hold "mini-meetings" in two communities, Needles and Trona, in recognition that their relative isolation made it unlikely that residents there would make the considerable journey to attend one of the larger public meetings elsewhere. Five larger public meetings were held, each in what was con- sidered a "population center" for surrounding coaununities. However, residents from all communities were invited to all meetings. People living in Big Bear, for example, were pre- sent at the San Bernardino meeting as well as the Victorville meeting. There is one overriding consideration which must be kept in mind: San Bernardino County is the largest county in the United States. The size of the area studied in this report presents problems all its own in reaching people to determine what problems they believe exist in the arts. In scheduling our public meetings we took into consideration communities in which 619,546 people out of the 756,800 people in the county lived. This does not mean the remaining 137,256 were ignored. It does mean we could not place them in a specific community and, consequently, they do not appear in the statistics. If those people read a newspaper or listen to a radio station, they could have been aware of the public meetings, may have responded to a questionnaire, and, per- haps, contributed to this study. The "population centers" in which public meetings were held, and the communities which we identified with those centers, are listed below. 28 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS * San Bernardino 105,400 " Big Bear Lake 6,640 Big Bear City 5,268 Lake Arrowhead 2,863 Crestline 3,923 * Rialto 32,100 Bloomington 11,759 * Colton 19,300 " Loma Linda 8,775 * Grand Terrace 6,007 * Redlands 36,450 Highland 11,361 Muscoy 5,684 Mentone 4,030 Del Rosa 8,000 Yucaipa 20,994 Sub-Total 288,054 Yucca Valley Joshua Tree 1,618 Twentynine Palms 5,773 Sub-Total 7,391 * Victorville 13,250 Adelanto 2,160 Apple Valley 8,355 Lucerne Valley 2,260 Hesperia 7,218 Wrightwood 1,238 Sub-Total 34,481 " Needles 3,900 Trona 3,348 29 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS Ontario 70,600 * Upland 41,700 * Montclair 21,300 * Chino 33,250 * Rancho Cucamonga 49,800 Alta Loma 10,547 * Fontana 25,300 Etiwanda 1,560 Sub-Total 254,057 * Barstow 17,300 Hinkley 1,610 Lenwood 3,447 Daggett 1,920 Yermo 1,047 Fort Irwin 2,991 Sub-Total 28,315 GRAND TOTAL 619,546 Other Unincorporated Areas 137,256 County Population 756,800 * Incorporated City (17) 30 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS BARSTOW People attending the Barstow area public meeting were unani- mously agreed on a number of things: 1. There was great apathy in the community toward cultural arts and programming generally. 2. The facilities for programming are completely inade- quate, either badly in need of repair or too costly to rent. (Barstow Community College appeared to be an exception to tt,i.s universal criticism.) 3. Financing foz arts activities was inadequate. The city government was described as completely indifferent to the needs of arts groups, providing no lending sup- port whatsoever, and area merchants were equally also non-supportive. 4. Transportation was also lacking, both locally for the community's large senior citizen population, and inter- urban for people wishing to travel elsewhere for arts programming. To an observer at the meeting, the most unfortunate thing apparent was the unwillingness of anyone present to assume any leadership role in seeking to right what all present considered to be the wrongs in the community. As an exercise in futility, several persons noting concerns were specifically asked if they would accept a leadership role to do certain specified things. All declined. Most explained that they were "tired" from many years of service to the arts striving to improve local conditions. Of course there is potential leadership for the arts in Bar- stow; there is in any community. But it would take some considerable effort to find it, organize it, and motivate it. The Barstow area public meeting identified its needs in this priority: Expanding audiences. The areas of greater education, more publicity, and increased participation were cited. The need for a "core group" (arts council) 31 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS BARSTOW (CONTINUED) was discussed. (But no one present would agree to act as an implementer.) 2. Financing. (This is, of course, a means to an end; not an end in itself.) 3. Adequate facilities. 4. Transportation. 32 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS NEEDLES AND TRONA In San Bernardino County more than eighty per cent of the population lives in 2'~ per cent of the land area. But reach- ing some of the twenty per cent living in the other 975 per cent of the land area presented some problems. For purposes of the Needs Assessment it was determined that an effort would be made to contact and/or to involve every identifiable community with a population of three hundred or more persons. With the exception of two communities, we believe this was accomplished. The five large public meetings were well enough separated geographically so that one or more of them was within twenty- five miles of most communities. The two exceptions were Needles and Trona. It was decided to hold "mini-meetings" in each of them. We found the two communities startlingly different. Needles Needles is an incorporated city of 3,900 people located about 235 miles away from the county seat. It is on the Colorado River. Arizona is across the river and Las Vegas, Nevada, is approximately a two-hour drive. No listings fos cultural arts groups appear in the te7.ephone directory nor is the Chamber of Commerce or the City Manager aware of any existing in the community. With some difficulty a few people with interest in, or in- volvement with, the arts were identified and contacted. All agreed there were, in fact, no cultural arts groups and that past efforts to organize such groups had failed in the face of widespread indifference. Rey people in the community generally seemed to agree that there was little interest now in cultural activities and that efforts to stimulate it would prove to be futile. Certainly we were unable to find any evidence of willing potential leadership. 33 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS NEEDLES AND TRONA (CONTINUED) Needles (Continued) We identify several reasons for this anomoly: There is great availability of recreational activities centered around the Colorado River, e.g. fishing, boating, etc. 2. Residents of Needles both attend and participate in comparatively well organized cultural activities in nearby resort areas in Arizona, e.g. Lake Havasv and Bullhead City. In addition, residents of Needles consider the trip to Las Vegas (some two hours) a relatively easy one. (Desert residents are less concerned with traveling considerable distances than are urban residents.) Apart from the more publicized "cultural activities" to be found in Las Vegas, there are also a good number, and wide variety, of more traditional forms of cultural programming. Las Vegas is a large city. Trona Trona, an unincorporated community of 3,350 people, is some 150 miles from the county seat and close to the borders of both Inyo and Kern Counties. Indeed, most people who work in Trona live in Ridgecrest, in Kern County, to escape the pervasive pollutants in Trona's air. Trona exists at all only because of the chemicals that are there to be extracted from the ground. The major employer is the Kerr-Mc Gee Corporation and the other small business in the commu::i ty serve the people who work for Kerr-Mc Gee. Kerr-MC Gee may be considered an "enlightened" employer--this term is not intended to be judgemental--in that it supplies considerable recreational facilities and strongly supports community projects. Trona is fortunate in having a surprising number of community groups and organizations although, unfortunately, relatively few of them ate involved with cultural arts. 34 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS NEEDLES AND TRONA (CONTINUED) Trona (COntinuedl Some concern was expressed by a number of Trona residents that there was no opportunity at all locally for youth to be ex- posed to either visual or performing arts from outside communities (or the outside world)• This is, unfortunately, a classic case: a small and very remote community, unable to generate very much on its own, too unimportant by most standards to attract very much from elsewhere. 35 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS SAN BERNARDINO The San Bernardino metropolitan area public meeting was the last of the series. As the county seat, as the largest city in the county, and as the community with the greatest num- ber of existing arts agencies, San Bernardino and the needs it identifies in this assessment is, and should be, a major factor in this overall report. Present also at this meeting were a number of individuals representing organizations in Redlands (a nearby community which has a remarkable number of excellent arts organizations, especially for its size). San Bernardino has a number of available facilities for pre- sentation of performing arts and/or visual arts. But, while the facilities exist, they are considered generally unsat- isfactory by the organizations using them. (See Appendix E.) To a major degree, persons present at this meeting were there as representatives of some organization. Very few people, at least as far as those who elected to speak, were there as individuals. This was unfortunate. As may be expected, much of the discussion centered on the need for either the construction of a major new performing arts center/cultural center or the major refurbishing of the Municipal Auditorium, standing but long unused. However, representatives from Redlands organizations questioned whether one such building in San Hernardirw truly could he considered as serving the area. The prioritized list of needs voted were: 1. Adequate facilities (art center, repairs and reno- vation on existing facilities) NEW or USED. 2. Youth/other talent development. 3. Arts communication/audience expansion. 4. Festival of the Arts. (The need here is, obviously, for organizational leadership and necessary funding.) 36 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS VICTORVILLE The Victorville area public meeting attracted a considerable number of representatives from the nearby mcur.tain communities. These people, of course, were primarily con- cerned with the needs they saw existing in the communities in which they lived...and which were not necessarily identical with those of the residents of Victorville itself. Victor Valley Community College is in the process of building a 500-seat perfozming arts center which should have a major effect in time on the availability of performing arts in the area. The "high desert," of which Victorville considers itself the key, is growing very rapidly. The influx includes a large number of people moving from metropolitan areas who are com- paratively wealthy and also accustomed to greater availability of arts programming than they are encountering. People representing arts organizations from the smaller mountain communities were extremely vocal in calling attention to their greatest need: meeting rooms. They were tired of maeting in private homes; tired of sharing public rooms with other organizations (never can get the nights we want); and tired of being ignored by both the state and the county be- cause (al our organizations are small, and (b) because our communities are small. There is probably no feasible way of solving this problem. Victor Valley has a colorful historic past. There are plans to build a Victor Valley Museum and some progress is being made in this. The Bear Valley Historical Society, which has obtained an "old government building," plans to open this spring. It reported, to the surprise and delight of everyone, that it had no financial problems. Most of the cultural activities in the urban area of the Victor Valley appear to be related to the community college. For example, the High Desert Symphony's conductor is on the college payroll, both rehersals and performances are in college facilities, music is furnished by the college, etc., etc. (Local volunteer musicians constitute the main body of 37 • • THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS VICTORVILLE (CONTINUED) symphony personnel. Outside professional musicians are used only to fill in vacancies when necessary.) Since victorville is only sane forty-four miles from San Bernardino, considerable interest was expressed by people present at the meeting in the newly-organized Inland Empire Cultural Foundation. When it was explained that the Founda- tion does not presently consider the high desert part of its service area the meeting's chairman asked for an expression from the audience urging the Foundation to widen its service area to include the Victor Valley. The action was unanimously in favor of this. The needs identified by the audience were not prioritized, primarily because the disparate elements of the audience attending made this difficult. 1. Increased youth programming. 2. Expanding audiences. 3. Adequate facilities (for performances). 4. Financing. 5. More meeting rooms (as distinct from performing space). 6. More galleries for visual arts exhibitions. 7. Developing a cultural arts council or commission. E. Increased availability of equipment. 9. Transportation to arts events elsewhere. 38 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART I1 (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS C,' WEST END The West End of San Bernardino County is unlike the four other "population centers" in which general public meetings were conducted in connection with the Needs Assessment. Of those four meetings, two (Barstow and Victorville) were held in what might be called the "dominant" cities of their areas. Another meeting (Yucca valley) was held in the center of an area in which there were no dominant cities. The fourth meeting (San Bernardino) was held in the heart of the metro- politan area, attended by citizens of many communities, but there was still no question as to what the dominant city was. In the case of the West End, the meeting site was Ontario. While the largest of the six incorporated cities in the area, Ontario is not the "dominant" city in the sense that this is true elsewhere. (This assertion is made with some trepi- dation; the co-chairman of the meeting was the Mayor of Ontario.) Consequently, and this does not necessarily follow logically, the meeting was much more concerned with the area as a whole than was true in other public meetings in the county. This was salutary; the alternative could well have been a quarrelsome debate between people championing their own common ities. Perhaps the most interesting development to come out of the meeting was an almost universal agreement that the West End needed an arts council (or, as it was frequently called, an organization of ante organizational. A volunteer present offered to take a leadership role and considerable progress has been made subsequently. The prioritized needs were: Expanding the audience - to include: a. Developing interesting in the arts via education. b. Publicity. c. Creating a "Directory of the Arts" for the entire Ontario community. d. Utilizing volunteer personnel on a wider scale. 39 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUED) PUBLIC MEETINGS WEST END (CONTINUED) 2. Funding for programs and activities. 3. Developing talent - to include: a. Creating a youth orchestra. b. Recognizing the "nearly lost" artisans. c. Coordinating programs and publicity with other groups. 4. Adequate facilities - to include: a. Repair and rennovation of existing facilities. Other needs expressed, but not prioritized, were transportation of the elderly and a need for matching funds for capital pur- poses. 40 ~ ~ TBE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART II (CONTINUE PUBLIC MEETINGS YUCCA VALLEY Cultural activities in the Yucca Valley area revolve around two facilities: first, and primarily, the county's Parks and Recreation building which includes a library, a museum, and a large general meeting room and, secondly, an amateur theatre group which has its own facility. while the Parks and Recreation Department provides the build- ing and pays necessary salary, a large group called the Friends of the Museum is exceedingly active. A community concert association which once flourished in the area has disappeared through disinterest. The persons present at the Yucca Valley public meeting were enthusiastic and eager. They were united in their desire for increased cultural activity in their area and were will- ing to work together to achieve this. Unlike some other communities, there was no lack of willing leadership or volunteers. Two prime objectives were identified: 1. The need to form a core group to unite the surrounding communities into a single body to seek a higher level of cultural activities. 2. To obtain funds for a central facility capable of serving all arts disciplines. (Conversion of two un- used super-markets existing side by side was advanced as a possible site.) Other needs expressed were 1. Increased youth programming and, as part of this, additional training. 2. Providing the area's youth with a greater variety of cultural programming than is currently available to them...either through importing talent or exporting youth. 3. Meeting rooms. 4. Exhibition space for visual artists. 41 ~ ~ SECTION 6 THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART III NEEDS AND GOALS WHEREAS, surveys, public demand, and increasing private sup- port and participation indicate that citizen involvement with the arts is strong and growing; and WHEREAS, continued growth of the arts in quantitative and qualitative ways can no longer be sustained by traditional support resources; and WHEREAS, the arts are an essential element in providing opportunity for a quality urban environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the United States Con- ference of Mayors adopts the following principles as guidelines for city action: 1. That city government recognize the arts as an essential service, equal in importance to other essential services, and help to make the arts avai la6le to all their citizens. 2. That every city be encouraged to establish a public agency specifically concerned with the arts. 3. That the physical appearance of the city, its architectural heritage and its amenities, be acknowledged as a resource to be nurtured. 4. That cities should be encouraged to establish a per- centage of the total cost of every municipal con- struction budget to 6e set aside for the purchase or cortunission of works of art. 5. That city governments working together with the pub- lic at large shall help to effect a new national goal: "That no American shall 6e deprived of the opportunity to experience for to respond artistically to) the beauty in life by barrier of circumstance, income, background, remoteness, or race." The above resolution, adopted by the United States Conference of Mayors at its 1974 annual conference, demonstrates the 42 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART III (CONTINUED) NEEDS AND GOALS growing governmental and public recognition of, and support for, the arts. Why? Because the past decade has brought an unprecedented growth in the arts. Even in San Bernardino County, where a case may be made that the arts have long been neglected, there is progress. In virtually every community contacted in the course of this Needs Assessment we have been approached by newly-formed arts organizations seeking direction, advice, and (inevitably) financial support. This increased involvement in, and concern with, the arts can be explained in part by more leisure time. Also, in many communities, minority and ethnic groups are forming to express their rich heritages through arts activities. Given the increasing complexities of community life, the arts and concern with cultural heritage provides an indi- vidual with a better sense of identity. Arts and cultural activities are becoming focal points of community life. The notion of the arts as a privilege should be discarded in favor of the arts as a right. As expressed by Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, government has a responsibility to "ensure that the arts, which are an essential grace in the life of a civilized peop le...be available in full measure to those who want them." The arts must be viewed as a basic community service, like schools, health care, police and fire protection, and libraries. Community services are not financially self- supporting and are not expected to be. They require the support of the total community. Thus, arts and cultural services require effective planning to ensure an equitable distru6ition of programs and provide for the proper allocation of scarce resources. The facts of life in the United States circa 1981 are, if not grim, not encouraging. Budget cutting is the order of the day in Washington and, from all indications, soon will be in Sacramento as well. And it is from these two capitals that grants traditionally come. Bond issues are impossible. In the wake of Proposition 13 cities are hard-pressed. 43 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART III (CONTINUED) NEEDS AND GOALS So, this is the best of times and this is the worse of times for arts organizations. On the one hand there is, perhaps, a greater level of interest in arts organizations on every level of society--including government--than there has ever been before. On the other hand, this is a time when there may be less available funds to be channeled into the arts from governmental sources than there has been in recent years. But in San Bernardino County arts organizations have never relied upon government support in the past (as detailed elsewhere in this report) so any increase at all, however minor, when accompanied by a greater awareness of, and attention to, their needs will be a major step in what must be the "right direction." These considerations aside, we now turn to a presentation of the Goals, Needs, and Objectives of the arts in San Bernardino County. (In its Guidelines, the California Arts Council refers to all three--Goals, Needs, and Objectives-- but defines none. In this report Goals and Objectives are treated as being interchangeable and address all "priority" Needs. There are, of course, some Needs identified through interviews, questionnaires, or at the public meetings, which were considered so low in priority that they were not con- sidered in setting the Goals/Objectives. It is an unfort- unate fact of life that a Need of one person, no matter how great its importance to him, is not necessarily of any im- portance to the community at large.) The basic standards applied to each Need before determining whether to make it a Goal/Objective were: Is it achievea6le? Is it feasible? 3. Is it affordable? Goals may be very general or very specific. In this case, they will be broad. (Subsequent recommendations will be somewhat more specific.) Each Goal is Stated and, where appropriate and necessary, sub-categories of Needs related to that Goal are detailed. 44 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART III (CONTINUED) NEEDS AND GOALS To develop increased audiences for the county's cultural arts organizations thereby increasing their financial stability through greater income. a. Special consideration must be given to youth and to special programming designed to meet their interests, to build their enthusiasm, and to whet their appetites. Today's youth are tomorrow's audiences, tomorrow's artists, and tomorrow's civic leaders. Never forget that 22.7 per cent of our county's residents are under thirteen years old. b. Further special consideration must be given to the handicapped, whether the disability stems Erom age or infirmities of physical impairment. They have the same love of beauty as others; they have the same rights of access to it. Never forget that 10.1 per cent of our county's residents are sixty- five years or older. c. To broaden the range of programming now offered to insure the involvement of any ethnic or minority element not served by existing programming in the community. Never forget that f.if teen per cent of our county's population are Hispanic and another five per cent are black. d. Provide transportation where needed to insure that no one is deprived of the arts through inability to attend performances. e. Develop a greatly increased public profile for arts organizations through public information pro- grams to create a greater awareness of their existence, their programming, and their needs. f. Strengthen where they exist, develop. where they do not exist, arts councils (or organizations of arts organizations) to undertake the many mutually beneficial programs within the ability of such groups to perform. To provide the proper facilities for all types of cultural expression in accessible locations. a. Refurbish existing structures. b. Build new structures. 45 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART III (CONTINUED) NEEDS AND GOALS Of the five "population centers" in the county previously identified the need for an "adequate multi-purpose facility" was clearly specified. In San Bernardino, a major refurbishing--and very costly--of the Municipal Auditorium (unused for the past several years) would probably be much more economically feasible than construction of a completely new performing arts center, which is the preferred alternative of many. The California Theatre, the only acceptable facility for most local performing arts groups, is generally viewed by them as extremely unsatisfactory. In Ontario, existing facilities seem adequate for the needs of most, but not all, performing groups. There is no great demand, nor does there appear to be any great need, for a completely new facility. However, the existing major facility-- Gardner Spring Auditorium--must be refurbished to some degree and income from arts organizations renting it from the school system should be used to maintain and upgrade the facility, a practice not presently followed. To develop opportunities for every cultural arts group to achieve financial solvency. a. In every public meeting and in most interviews and questionnaires "financing" was identified as a need. b. However, there was considerable discussion on whether or not "financing" should be identified as a Goal/Objective since, it was argued, this is a means to an end rather than an end in itself. "Financing," of course, is inevitably involved with "Facilities." Therefore, it must be noted that "Financing" implies funds for capital con- struction and/or refurbishing and improvements as well as program and operating funds. d. Matching funds from outside sources are considered an excellent incentive to local fund-raising efforts by many arts-involved people. 46 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART III (CONTINUED) NEEDS AND GOALS 9. To create and maintain an atmosohere conducive to the fullest exoression of all forms of cultural arts that are richly varied, technically excellent, and to en- rich the lives and fill the leisure time of all. a. To preserve, cultivate, and vitalize traditional arts. b. To encourage and promote experimental, ethnic, and the newer arts. c. To expand the concept of arts by relating it to wider areas of aesthetic concerns such as archi- tecture, graphics, and interior design. d. To insure that not only professional but amateur activity is promoted and encouraged. e. To be equally concerned with the differing needs of those who produce and/or perform art and those who merely enjoy and/or attend it. PREVIOUS STUDY We are unaware of any previous Needs Assessment conducted which included all of, and solely, San Bernardino County. Perhaps the most comparable study was one conducted some two years ago by the Four Counties Arts Council in the counties of Imperial, Inyo, Riverside, and Ban Bernardino. While we do NOT wish to signify that the results of this study should necessarily be similar to oar's, we do believe the "six high priority recommendations" developed by that study and made to the California Arts Council should be re- corded. They are directly quoted and were: "1. Cortmunicate what the Council is and what the Council is doing. "2. Fund Raising/How to get Money. "3. Produce Communications and Media Material. 47 ~ ~ THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PART ZII (CONTINUED) NEEDS AND GOALS PREVIOUS STUDY (CONTINUED) "4. Carry out a Market Analysis of Needs. "5. Form United Approaches (with Diversities). "6. Develop Program to Broaden the Base of Support and Participation." 48 SECTION 7 THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS Given the general Goals/Objectives developed, the logical next step is to present recommendations for achieving and/or accomplishing those Goals/Objectives. This leads inevitably to the requirement that some agency be designated to undertake that responsibility. Even if nothing else were ever to happen, additional money will be available shortly to San Bernardino County (from $5,000.00 to $10,000.00), as the second part of this State/Local Partner- ship Program. Someone, or some agency, must decide, where, how, and in what amounts that money will be spent. In our opinion there are at least four acceptable alternatives for accomplishing this plus several other possibilities which were rejected as unacceptable. Our recommendation is that the Board of Supervisors designate the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation (with certain changes in its organizational structure) to administer and to imple- ment this undertaking. The three other alternatives are: 1. Create a new division within the County Parks and Recreation Department. 2. Create an entirely new office or department within the County government. 3. Either hire an arts coordinator, or designate one from among present County employees, who would be made a special assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer of the County. The following pertinent points were taken into consideration in determining our recommendation: 1. The Inland Empire Cultural I'ovndation, in developing this Needs Asaesament and Comprehensive Countywide Arts Plan, has gained considerable important infor- mation about, and understanding of, cultural arts c i 49 ~ ~ THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) groups and arts-oriented individuals throughout the county which would be invaluable in any extension of this undertaking. The Foundation already considers its service crPa '.:o include the metropolitan area of San Bernardino County in which the great percentage of the county's popu- lation resides. The Executive Committee of the Foundation is prepared to recommend to the Board of Directors that it vote to expand its service area to include the remainder of the County and to provide for additional representation on the Board from the new areas. The Foundation was originally established to serve the greater San Bernardino/Riverside/Ontario/Redlands metropolitan area. We consider this to be a single community which happens to have a county line running through it. Our Board is drawn from both counties. We support organizations in both counties. The Founda- tion is also the designated agency of the County of Riverside under the State/Local Partnership Program. It is our hope and intent to continue our regional planning approach but this will only be possible if we are designated by the Boards of Supervisors of both counties. Since, obviously, funding to realize the Goals/ Objectives already identified must he considerably greater than will be realized from the California Arts Council, the Foundation has already established itself as a successful fund-raising organization. And, as a private organization rather than one affiliated with some branch of county or city government, we are more likely to be successful in appealing to private in- dustry for financial support. Through its Admissions and Allocations Committee, the Foundation already has the necessary structure, and volunteer experience, for dealing with a variety of arts organizations and individuals. Through its Educational Council of the Inland Empire, the Foundation already has the necessary structure and volunteer experience for dealing with, and re- lating to, the majority of the educational institutions in the County. 50 SHE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS {CONTINUED) Through its Board o£ Directors and other volunteer structures, the Foundation already has a group of volunteers widely representative of the metzopolitan area of the County, most of its cities, and, especially, of its major arts organizations. The Foundation already has a staff executive of proven administrative capability, knowledgeable in fund- raising, experienced in the arts and with arts organi- zations, and familiar with the policies and require- ments of the California Arts Council in general and of the State/Local Partnership Frogram in particular. LOCAL PRIORITIES GRANT Regardless of what decision the Board of Supervisors makes regarding the designation of an organization, following re- view and approval of this Needs Assessment and Plan it will be forwarded to Sacramento for review and approval of the California Arts Council. Still remaining from the original $1,100,000.00 allocated to the State/Local Partnership Program is $416,000.00. This is to be divided up among the participating counties on a dollar- to-dollar matching basis on a formula based on two factors. Need factor. This is defined as the by the total percentage California residing in will receive sixty per Priorities monies. total allocation divided of the population of any county. This factor cent of the Local Effort factor. This is defined as the total per capita spending for the arts by local government agencies, as adjusted to reflect average personal income. This factor will receive forty per cent of the Local PLlOrlt ies mon les. 51 ~ ~ THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) LOCAL PRIORITIES GRANT (CONTINUED) For example: county population % 5212,400 -_ county Eunding state population based on need county per capita acts support county average personal income % 5141,600 -_ county funding total o above figures based on effort for all counties county funding + county funding __ total county based on need based on effort Local Priorities Grant it is anticipated that Local Priorities Grants may be used for Direct Programming, Technical Assistance, Info nnation Services, and/or Grants Programs, as long as grant monies are spent according to local plans and California Arts Council funding policies. These policies include high artistic achievement, equitable recognition and compensation of artists for their work, and recognition of cultural diversity. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OE.lECTIVES 1. Work with, and encourage, school districts to increase and improve arts-related courses. 2. Wozk with, and encourage, established arts organi- zations to assist in the creation, and improvement, of such courses and to in~~olve themselves in the teaching thereof and otherwise to act as resources. 52 ~ ~ THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUEb) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED) AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) 3. In concert (no pun intended) with the California Arts Council, arrange for greater utilization of such Council programs as the Dance Touring Program, Artists in Schools, etc. 4. In concert with the schools and the performing arts organizations, arrange for greater attendance of stu- dents at arts presentations, utilizing free tickets, discounted tickets, and whatever other means are in- dicated and are feasible. 5. Arrange for individual artists to visit schools, to participate in arts training and programs. 6. Arrange for arts organizations, schools, and local businesses to cooperate in sponsoring children- oriented workshops and seminars. 7. In cooperation with organizations for senior citizens and those for the handicapped, arrange necessary transportation, discounted or free tickets, and pre- sentations by individual artists and arts organi- zations at meetings and hospitals. 8. In cooperation with clubs, groups, and organizations of ethnic and minority adults and children, seek to involve that constituency in the "main stream" of the community's arts programming and, where indicated, with equal diligence seek to create arts programming more orientated to their wishes. 9. Provide technical assistance to individual groups and offer central services to all groups in the areas of promotion and publicity to assist in impzoving public information programs and creating a greater awareness of the programs presented within the community. 10. Take a leadership role in insuring the formation of an effective, functioning arts council in each community (or, where indicated, communities) and to work toward the formation of a countywide arts council in addition. 53 ~ ~ THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED) AUDIENCE DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) 11. Encourage cultural arts organizations as well as individual artists to provide programs and services in areas and to groups which are, or could be, culturally-deprived. For example, there are two Sierra Conservation Centers in San Bernardino County whose inmates are badly in need of a variety of arts programs, both classes and events. 12. Etc., etc. FACILITIES 1. Identify and classify all existing facilities that can be used for cultural presentations or for meetings of cultural organizations. 2. Serve as a coordinator to bring together arts organi- zations needing facilities and facilities that are available. 3. Work with the managers of facilities to insure the greatest possible utilization on a regularly scheduled basis. 9. Work with managers of public facilities to evaluate such facilities to determine what changes and/or im- provements are needed to make them more suitable for cultural presentations. 5. In concert with the managers of public facilities urge the appropriate bodies (City Councils, etc.) to make such improvements. 6. Etc., etc. FINANCING 1. Work toward establishing "central services" wherever possible for all arts organizations (and, where in- dicated, individual artists) with the resultant sav- ings in money. 54 ~ ~ THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED) FINANCING (CONTINUED) 2. Assist in coordinating the space requirements of various groups to determine whether joint occupancy would be feasible and cost-saving. 3. Assist the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation in its annual fund-raising campaign to insure its success in eliciting support from the business and private sect- ors for the arts. 9. Assist local cultural organizations and individual artists in making application to the California Arts Council, the National Endowment for the Arts, and other foundations and funding sources. 5. Assist the California Confederation of the Arts in its annual effort to secure legislative support for the proposed California Arts Council budget. 6. Etc., etc. EXPRESSION 1. Actively promote and publicize all forms o£ cultural arts in local media. 2. Act as a central clearinghouse for information on local cultural events. 3. Assist in finding sponsorship for programs of cultural events by minority and ethnic groups to acquaint other residents with different forms of artistic expression. 4. Encourage arts festivals and similar multi-disciplined presentations and, in so doing, cultivate the par- ticipation of less-known forms of art, both experi- mental and traditional. 5. Etc., etc. 55 ~ ~ THE FUTURE - RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACHIEVING THE GOALS/OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED) IN CONCLUSION The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation is happy to have con- ducted this Needs Assessment and to prepare this Countywide Arts Plan for submission to the Board of Supervisors. In doing so we have expended the Planning Grant plus some additional funds of our own, which we do cheerfully as a contribution to this important undertaking. Whether the Board elects to designate us as the agency to carry on with this program or not, the Foundatiott stands ready to assist the Board in any way it can in any endeavor in the cultural arts field. We also specifically offer to provide the required "matching Funds" for the Local Priorities Grant part o£ this program. And, finally, we thank the Board of Supervisors for desig- nating us to undertake this project and we also extend our appreciation to the hundreds, even thousands, of our fellow- residents of San Bernardino County who participated through their attendance at meetings, by responding to questionnaires, and in personal interviews, and in many other ways. 56 APPENDIX A INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEX NAME PHONE IP ADDRESS NAME OF ORGANIZATION(if applicable) ADDRESS CITY 2IP_ PHONE IF YOU ARE RESPONDING ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS. IF YOU ARE RESPONDING AS AN INDIVIDUAL GO TO PAGE FOUR AND ANSWER QUESTIONS SIXTEEN THRU TtVENTY-FOUR ONLY. TYPE OF ORGANIZATION 1. a. Performing arts b. Visual arts c. Arts council d. Community arts museum/gallery e. Association of artiste f. Other (church, educational, etc., please specify) TYPE OF ACTIVITIES 2. a. Exhibits b. Theatre performances c. pance `d. Classes e. Others (fairs, festivals, tours, etc., please specify) ACTIVITIES/FACIILITIES 3. Where are your organization's cultural activities currently held? a. Your own facility b. School auditoriums _ c. Churches d. Community or civic center I ~ ~ _e. Other (please specify) 4. What other activities are the facility used for? a. Exhibits b. Theatre c. Music d. Dance _e. Classes _f.~ Other (please specify) 5. Is your staff paid volunteer or both? a. Number paid _b. Volunteer 6. In your opinion, do your present facilities meet current needs? _Yes _No If your answer is NO, what do you feel is needed (i.e. equipme rt, repairs, improvements, etc.)? 7. In your opinion, will your present facilities meet future needs? _Yes _No If your answer is NO, what do you feel is needed (i.e. equipment, repairs, improvements, etc.)? 8. Are your present facilities owned by your organization? _Yes No Rented or leased? _Yes No Donated? Yes No (if yes, please specify by whom) 9. If your organization does not currently have space available for desired cultural events, what type of facility is needed? II ~ ~ 10. Does your oryanization currently have adequate equipment with which to offer a full range of activities? ,Yes _No If not, what else do you feel is needed? 11. Do you now, or do you plan in the future to, either coordinate activities with another group or offer joint activities? `Yes _No If yes, with which other organization? 12. Do you believe your organization's activities are being locally duplicated to a considerable degree by other organizations? _Yes _No Sf yes, what organizations? BUDGET 13. What is your organization's total budget? Last fiscal year $ Current fiscal year $ 14. During your last fiscal year, what amounts did you receive from: Federal government S State government $_ Local government S Corporations $ Individuals $ Fund-raisers $ Admissions $ Other $ 15. What percentage of your budget is used for: Management Programs/Activities III ~ ~ PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING WANTS AND NEEDS IN ORDER OF IMPOP.TANCE WANTS AND NEEDS 16. In your opinion, are the facilities in your community adeouate for the cultural activities you attend? _Yes _No If your answer is no, what else do you feel is needed? 17. In your opinion, are the present facilities in your community adequate to meet future needs? _Yes _No If no, what else is needed? 18. Are there any cultural activities not currently offered that you feel would be of value to your community? If so, please list in order of importance to you. 19. What do you believe is needed to make these available? 20. Please list, in order of importance to you, the types of cultural activities you attend? 21. Where do you presently attend cultural activities? in your own community Outside your community (specify distance travelled) _ 22. How many times per year do you attend cultural activities? Any comments? IV ~ ~ 23. Would you like to have cultural activities brought into your community from other areas? _Yes _No Specify types of activities. 24. Final continents: Please use the remaining space for additional information or comments concerning your community's cultural organizations or programs, current or future. use additional paper if necessary. Please complete within five days and return to: Inland Empire Cultural Foundation 11161 Santo Antonio Drive - Suite J Colton, California, 92324 v ~ ~ APPENDIX e EXPENDITURES ON CULTURAL ARTS PROGRAMS BY CITIES The figures shown below have been provided by the City Manager, or by a person designated by him, and are believed accurate. Unfortunately, no city contacted had available the Public Arts Expenditures forms mailed directly to it by the California Arts Council. Additional forms will be prepared by the Inland Empire Cultural Foundation and mailed to the cities for return. (It should be noted here that there have been some expressions of dissatisfaction from various city officials stemming from their beliefs that the time involved in furnishing the information is unlikely to be repaid in the form of grants coming into their communities.) VI ~ ~ EXPENDITURES ON CULTURAL ARTS PROGRAMS BY CITIES (Continued) Total For Budget Cultural Arts Adelanto 880,000 5,000 sarstow 9,000,000 0 Big Bear Lake (Not available until March 15) Chino 14,500,000 10,500 Colton 6,000,000 360,000 Fontana 4,750,000 7,000 Grand Terrace 50,000 5,000 Loma Linda 3,000,000 0 Montclair 8,800,000 10,000 Needles 2,000,000 0 Ontario 37,200,000 1,145,828 Rancho Cucamonga 5,500,000 33,750 Redlands 9,000,000 55,000 Rialto 5,000,000 66,803 San Bernardino 41,457,000 70,000 Upland 18,723,785 5,150 Victorville 8,000,000 600 TOTAL 245,860,785 1,774,631 VII ~ ~ APPENDIX C EXPENDITURES ON CULTURAL ARTS PROGRAMS BY COUNTY San Bernardino County Library $ 8,000.00 Inland Empire Cultural Foundation (grant) 100,000.00 San Bernardino Ccunty Museum 297,738.00 County Parks and Recreation Di.stric ts: (based on 25~ of total operating budget) 45,020.50 Chino/Glen Mead 180,082.00 Muscoy 17,386.00 Barstow 645,909.00 Big Bear Valley 532,638.00 Bloomington 116,534.00 Cedar Pines 9,216.00 Joshua Tree 175,807.00 North Fontana 95,438.00 Twen tynine Palms 296,734.00 Yucaipa Valley 446,431.00 Yveca Valley 350,180.00 TOTAL $3,317,113.50 VIII ~ ~ APPENDIX D LISTING OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS In San Bernardino County there are: 39 public school districts 4 community college districts (5 colleges) 1 state college 2 private universities These school districts and educational institutions are listed herewith: PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS Adelanto School District (K-61 Adelanto Alta Loma School District (K-8) Alta Loma Apple Valley School District (K-61 Apple Valley 3aker Valley Unified School District (K-l2) Baker Barstow Unified School District (K-12) Barstow Bear Valley unified School District {K-12) Big Bear Lake Central School District IK-8) Rancho Cucamonga Chaffey Joint Union tli gh School District 19-12) Ontario Chino Unified School District (K-12) Chino IX ~ ~ LISTING OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (CONTINUED) PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED) Colton Joint Unified School District (K-12) Colton Cucamonga School District (K-H) Cucamonga Etiwanda School District (K-H) Etiwanda Fontana Unified School District (K-12) Fontana Helendale School District (K-6) Helendale Hesperia School District (K-6) Hesperia Lucerne Valley Union School District (K-6) Lucerne Valley Morongo Unified School District (K-12) Twentynine Palms Mountain View School District (K-e) Ontario Mount Baldy Joint School District (K-8) Mount Baldy Needles Unified School District (K-12) Needles Ontario-Montclair School District (K-8) Ontario Oro Grande School District (K-6) Oro Grande Phelan School District (K-6) Phelan Redlands Unified School District (K-12) Redlands X ~ ~ LISTING OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (CONTINUED) PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED) Rialto Unified School District (K-12) Rialto Rim of the World Unified School District (K-12) Lake Arrowhead San Bernardino City Unified School District (K-12) San Bernardino Silver Valley Unified School District 1K-12) Yermo Trona Joint Unified School District (K-12) Trona Upland School District (K-8) Upland Victor School District (K-61 Victorville Victor Valley Joint Union High School ^istrict (7-12) Victorville Wrightwood Joint School District (K-6) Wrightwood Yucaipa Joint Unified School District (K-12) Yucaipa COMMUNITY COLLEGES San Bernardino Community College (2 Colleges) San Bernardino Barstow Community College Barstow Chaffey Community College Alta Loma Victor Valley Community College Victorville XI ~ ~ LISTING OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (CONTINUED) STATE COLLEGES California State College San Bernardino PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES Loma Linda University Loma Linda University of Redlands Redlands XII ~ r APPENDIX E AVAILABLE (LARGE) FACILITIES Information for this appendix was still being compiled when this preliminary draft was gathered to meet early deadlines required to present this report to certain City Councils. ~ ~ APPENDIX E AVAILABLE (LARGE) PACILITIES Adelanto Three school cafetoriums with average seating of 250 persons. Alta Loma Alta Loma High School has a multi-purpose auditorium that seats approximately 750 persons. Chaffey College has a multi- purpose auditorium that seats approximately 360 persons. Apple Valley Parks and Recreation Auditorium seats approximately 300. Barstow Garver Memorial Auditorium at Barstow High School seats approximately 500 to 600 persona. Smith Center at Barstow College seats approximately 200 persons. The gym Ino stage) at Barstow College seats approximately 2,500 persons. The Parks and Recreation Departmen t, has a community center- qym with a portable stage that seats approximately 1,000 persona. The Parka and Recreation Department also has a new building with bleachers and stage that seats approxi- mately 600 persons. Big Bear Valley Big Bear Convention Center is privately owned and seats approximately 800 Persona. Chino The gym at Chino High School is available but capacity is not known. Colton Colton Civic Center seats approximately 70 persons. Hutton Center seats approximately 100 persons. Lukay Center seats approximately 100 persons. Colton High School auditorium seats approximately 1,100 persons. XIII ~ ~ AVAILABLE (LARGE) FACILITIES (CONTINUEDI Etiwanda Intermediate School used by school only. Elementary school used by school only. Fontana Fontana High School has an auditorium (on fee basis) that seats approximately 1,470 persons. Fontana Junior High School has an auditorium (on fee basis) that seats approxi- mately 600 persons. Community Center (on fee basis) has an auditorium that Beata approximately 300 persona. Grand Terrace No "event" fac ilitiea exist at the present time. Joshua Tree Community Center (no stage) seats approximately 125 persona. Elementary School seats approximately 200 persons. High Desert Playhouse Guild (cultural center) seats approximately 185 persons. Lake Arrowhead Mazy Putnam Nenck School seats approximately 250 to 300 persons. Burnt Mill Beach Club, which ie privately owned, Beata approximately 250 persona. Loma Linda Loma Linda University Ampitheatre which will seat approxi- mately 300 persons is still under construction. Avail- ability to the public for public use has not yet been determined. Lucerne Va llev Lucerne Valley Community Center Beata approximately 20U persona. Montclair Montclair High School has two auditoriums. One seats approximately 209 persona. The other auditorium seats approximately 789 persona. XIV ~ ~ AVAILABLE (LARGE) FACILITIES (CONTINUED) Needles Needles High School auditorium seats approximately 200 persons. Ontario There are four Junior High Schools with cafetoriums and each seats approximately 575 persons. There is one ele- mentary school that seats approximately 575 persons. Merton Hill Auditorium seats approximately 600 persons. Gardner Spring Auditorium seats approximately 2,300 persons. The Home Ec Building at the high school has seating for approximately 1R2 persons. Ontario High School Auditorium seats approx in'ately 1,283 persons. Ontario Community Center (no stage) seats approximately 225 persons. Ontario National Golf Course has a room with stage that seats approximately 300 persons. The Central School has an auditorium that seats approximately 400 persona, but it is not currently in use at this time. Rancho Cucamonga ' Two Elementary Schools with auditoriums and stages. One seats approximately 275 persons and the other seats approximately 523 peraone. Rancho Cucamonga Middle School Auditorium has a stage and seats approximately 250 persona. The Neighborhood Center seats approximately 250 peraone. Lions Park Community Center has five meeting rooms and can accommodate approximately 765 persona. Redlands Grace Mullen Auditorium seats approximately 400 persons. Clock Auditorium seats approximately 1,000 persona. Uni- versity of Redlands Theatre seats approximately 300 peraone. University of Redlands Chapel seats approximately 1,200 pe reona. The Red ianda Bowl (outdoor facility) seats approximately 4,500 persona. Rialto Community Center (multi-purpose) seats approximately 930 peraone. XV ~ ~ AVAILABLE (LARGE) FACILITIES (CONTINUED) San Bernardino. Orange Show/Swing Auditorium seats approximately 2,500 to 3,500 persons. California Theatre seats approximately 1,760 persons. Sturges Auditorium seats approximately 700 persons. Parks and Recreation Theatre seats approximately 50 persons. Perris Hill Park Theatre (outdoor fac ilityl seats approximately 1,800 persons. San Bernardino Valley College Liheral Arts Nall seats approximately 250 persons and the Main Theatre seats approximately 640 persona. Cal- State College Players of the Pear Garden seats approximately 150 persons and the Recital Hall seats approximately 248 persons. All of the following Intermediate Schools have a seating capacity of 350 persona: Arrowview, Curtis, Del Vallejo, Golden Valley, and Richardson. Serrano and Bhandin Hills Intermediate Schools have seating for approximately 60 persons. Pacific Nigh School Auditorium seats 1,100 persons. San Bernardino High School Auditorium seats 1,500 persons. San Andreas High School Auditorium seats 350 persons. Cajon High School Auditorium/Little Theatre seats approxi- mately 208 persons. Trona The Senior Citizens Community Center has no stage and seats approximately SO persona. Anew senior center is to be built but the capacity is unknown. T.he capacity is also un- known at Trona High School Gym. Twentynine Palms Twentyn ins Palms High School seats approximately 400 persons. Yucca Mesa Improvement Center has no stage and seats approxi- mately 150 persons. Upland Upland High School seats approximately 1,200 persons. The elementary school seats approximately 500 persona. Vic torville Victorville College Performing Arts Center seats approxi- mately 500 persons and the gym seats 300 to 500 persons. Victor Valley High School gym seats approximately 900 persons. Pazka and Recreation has a room with quasi-stage that seats approximately 150 to 200 pereone. XVI AVAILABLE (LARGE) FACILITIES (CONTINUED) Wrightwood Wrightwood Community Center seats approximately 200 persona. Wrightwood Elementary School Auditorium seats approximately 200 persons. The high school accommodates 500 to 600 per- sons. Yucaipa Grafton Hills College Auditorium/Theatre seats approximately 425 to 450 persons. Yucca Valley Community Center (on fee basis) hae seating for approxi- mately 300 people. Yucca Valley High School seats approxi- mately 600 persons and the elementary school seats 200 persons. XVII ~ ~ APPENDIX F ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN SURVEY (INTERVIEWS AND QUESTIONNAIRES) Adelanto Adelanto Senior Citizens Club Arts Coordinator for Adelanto Aoole Valle American Association of Retired People Children's Home Society, Ninos~ Future Farmers of America Harlequin Repertory Company Alta Loma Senior Citizens V.I.P. Club West End Symphony Orchestra Barstow 50-90 Club American Association of Retired People Barstow Community Players Barstow Parks and Recreation (visual arts) High Desert Arts and Crafts Luabach Literary School Mojave Valley Senior Citizens N. A. A. C. P. (community organization) Biq Bear City American Association of Retired People Hig Bear Community Concert Bear Valley Historical Society (museum/gallery) Big Bear Lake Bear Valley Art Association Bear Valley Education Association (high school) Bear Valley on State (cultural organization) Los Vaqueros (equestrian club) XVIII ~ ~ ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN SURVEY (CONTINUED) (INTERVIEWS AND QUESTIGNNAIRE$) Blue Say Rim of the World Artists and Craftsmen Calimesa American Association of Retired People Cherry Valley Sweet Adelines (choral group) Chino Chino Recreation Department Chino Youth Services Junior Fair Association Claremont Crippled Children's Society Guild Old Baldy Boy Scouts of America Shrine Club West End Opera Guild Colton Ballet Folklorico Children's Center Colton Chorale (high school youth) Colton Public Library Colton Unified School District Stage Productions Senior Citizens Club Creatline West Mountain Community Services Daggett Association for Childhood Education Daggett Historical Society Fontana American Association of Retired People Disabled American Veterans - M87 Fontana City Cultural Commission Fontana Historical Society (museum/education) Fontana Mummers (cultural organization/theatre) XIX ~ ~ ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN SORVEY (CONTINUED) (INTERVIEWS AND QUESTIONNAIRES) Fontana (Continued) Kiwanis Club of Fontana Senior Citizens Steelworkers Old Timers Foundation Grand Terrace City of Grand Terrace Hesperia American Association of Retired People California Federation of Chapperal Poets Desert Seekers (young historian club) Four H Club Hesperia branch, San eerna rdino County Library Hesperia Lamplighters Hesperia Leisure League Mesa Grande School Lake Arrowhead American Association of Retired People Senior Citizens Lama Linda Inland Arts Society Lucerne Valley American Association of Retired People oese r.t Crossroads Garden Club Lucerne Valley Four H Club Lucerne Valley Museum Society Montclair Ontario Historic Landmarks Society, Incorporated Pomona Valley Workshop Association Newberry Springs Daggett American Association of Retired People Ontario Colony Park Senior Citizens Fun After 50 Club, Incorporated Gallery Theatre XX ~ ~ ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN SURVEY (CONTINUED) (INTERVIEWS AND QUESTIONNAIRES) Ontario (Continued) Ontario Civic Light Opera Pomona Valley Concert Association West End Senior Citizens Inner Club Council Phelan Phelan Chamber of Commerce Rancho Cucamonga Alta Loma Music Casa de Rancho Cucamonga Chaffey Community Art Association FOUr H Club Friends of the Library Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Rancho Cucamonga Historic Society Redlands A. K. Smiley Public Library American Association of Retired People Fine Arts Institute Friends of Music Joslyn Senior Centel Lyon Gallery Redlands Art Association Redlands Community Music Association Redlands Council of the Arts Redlands Footlighters Redlands Historical Society San Bernardino County Historical Bottle and Collectible Club San Bernardino County Museum Traditional Artists Association Y. M. C. A. (community organization and facility) Rialto American Association of Retired People Associated Rialto Talent City of Rialto Rialto Historical Society XXI ~ ~ ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN SURVEY (CONTINUED) (INTERVIEWS AND 4UESTIONNAIRES) San Bernardino American Association of Retired People Arrowhead Allied Arts Council Biq County Chordsmen (cultural organization/music) Cal-State San Bernardino / Theatre Arts Department Civic Light Opera Association Community Arts Prc3uctions (performing arts) M. E. C. H. A. (community organization) Retired Persons, Incorporated San Bernardino Art Association San Bernardino Concert Association San Bernardino Junior University (community organization) San Bernardino Pageant San Bernardino Symphony Association Y. M. C. A. Seniors Y. M. C. A. Uptown Branch Sugarloaf American Association of Retired People Children's Play Group (community organization) Sunshine Club Seniors Trona Searles Valley Senior Citizens Club Senior Citizens Club Twentvnine Palms Artists Guild Foundation for the Retarded High Desert Mexican-American Club (dances/other) Senior Citizens Club Twentynine Palms Community Council U land American Association of Retired People Associated Artists Chaffey Communities Cultural Center-Museum Foothill Farmers Four H Club Friends of the Upland Library Ontario Community Concert Association Ontario-Pomona Association for Retarded Citizens Upland Boys Club West End Opera Association XXII ~ ~ ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN SURVEY (CONTINUED) (INTERVIEWS AND QUESTIONNAIRES) Victorville American Association of Retired People Bell Mountain Seniors Club Friends of the Symphony [lead Start Pre-School Center High Desert Activities for the Phys is Tally Handicapped High Desert Activities High Desert Symphony Mojave Historical Society San Bernardino County Fair Theatre Arts and Music Guild Victor Valley College Victor. Valley Community Concert Association Victor Valley Museum Victorville Senior Citizens, Incorporated Wriqhtwood Tri-Community Art Association Wriqhtwood Area Cultural Organization Wrigh twood Community Players Wriqhtwood Historical Society Wriqhtwood Writers Workshop Yermo Mojave Desert Allied Seniors Yucaipa Association for the Blind Historical Society of Yucaipa Valley Yucaipa Little Theatre Yucca Valley American Association of Retired People California Retired Teachers Association Nigh Desert Nature Museum Association Promusica Quartet Yucca Valley Art Association Yucca Valley Park and Recreation District XXIII ~ ~ APPENDIX G SAN BERNABDINO COUNTY Total Population by Race, Sex, end Age 1981 (pro]ec cad) Black Whits Total Not Hiap. Hispanic Not HfaF• Other BoCh Sexes Total (a) 864,900 46,750 128,540 670,470 19,150 Male Total 427,630 24,030 61,050 333,290 9,260 0-13 100,430 6,740 16,220 75,070 2,400 14 7,500 440 1,410 5,460 190 15 7,400 440 1,390 5,390 190 16 7,810 530 1,560 5,520 200 l7 8,240 560 1,640 5,830 210 18 8,180 550 1,630 5,780 210 19 8,240 560 1,640 5,830 210 20 9,340 630 1,860 6,610 240 21 9,380 840 1,610 6,640 290 22 0,760 780 1,500 6,200 270 23-24 15,940 1,430 2,730 11,290 490 25-34 70,430 4,470 10,260 53,970 1,730 35-44 53,400 2,330 6,550 43,470 1,050 45-49 21,860 1,040 2,660 17,740 420 50-54 10,760 800 2,240 15,400 330 55-59 19,520 660 2,390 16,200 270 60-64 15,810 430 1,390 13,830 160 85+ 36,610 820 2,340 33,060 400 Female Total 437,270 22,720 67,480 337,180 9,890 0-13 95,860 6,410 16,930 70,350 2,170 14 7,130 430 1,370 5,150 180 15 7,020 420 1,350 5,070 I80 16 7,500 460 1,760 5,090 180 17 7,900 450 1,880 5,370 190 18 7,930 480 1,860 5,780 200 19 8,130 490 1,910 5,530 200 20 8,150 500 1,920 5,540 200 21 8,080 580 1,540 5,740 230 22 7,710 550 1,460 5,480 220 23-24 14,880 1,070 2,830 10,570 410 25-34 70,740 4,080 11,650 53,100 1,900 35-44 54,110 2,460 8,250 41,980 1,420 45-49 21,870 1,090 3,190 16,920 670 50-54 39,910 840 2,710 15,860 510 55-59 21,620 890 2,310 18,230 380 60.64 17,880 480 1,340 15,680 200 65+ 51,040 1,210 3,240 48,140 440 (a) Pare may not add [o Wcala because of lndepandent rounding. Due co improvements in the mthodology for preparing these population eatlmates, the date are not compsraDle to [hose published in previous yearn. xxly SOURCE: Glifotnia Stste Faployment Development Depaitmeot ~ ~ APPENDIX H SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Civilian labor Force by Race, Sex, and Age 1961 (proiec[ed) Black White Total Not Hisp. Hispanic Not Hisp. Other Both Sexes Total (a) 343,000 16,720 50,550 268,140 7,590 Hale ' Total 203,360 9,400 29,550 160,360 4,050 16 2,710 100 500 2,060 50 17 4,100 160 780 3,090 80 18 4,800 220 1,000 3,500 100 19 5,030 250 1,1SD 3,530 100 20 5,760 280 1,330 4,040 120 21 5,890 380 1,210 4,160 140 22 5,730 410 1,150 4,020 150 23-24 11,860 B90' 2,190 8,460 320 25-34 54,560 3,060 8,270 41,990 1,240 35-44 42,970 1,680 5,300 35,160 830 45-49 17,410 720 2,100 14,270 320 50-54 14,730 540 1,750 12,200 250 55-59 13,970 410 1,710 11,650 210 60-64 8,400 190 740 7,370 l00 65+ 5,410 120 370 4,860 60 Female Total 139,640 7,320 21,000 107,780 3,540 l6 1,670 50 350 1,240 30 17 3,210 IIO 670 2,370 70 18 3,890 170 850 2,790 BO 19 4,800 240 1,070 3,400 100 20 4,700 240 1,070 3,290 100 2l 4,7r0 3l0 860 3,430 l30 22 4,550 300 790 3,340 120 23-24 8,650 600 1,470 6,340 240 25-34 38,450 2,460 5,980 29,010 990 35-44 28,420 1,360 4,090 22,200 780 45-49 10,650 560 1,420 8,270 400 50-54 9,450 390 1,150 7,610 290 SS-59 8,720 300 790 7,500 l20 60-64 4,780 140 290 4,300 60 65+ 2,960 90 160 2,680 20 (a) Parts mey sot add to totals because of fodependent rounding. Due to lmrpovements in the methodology for preparing these labor force eatimatea, the data ate sot comparable to aetimatas published in previous yeas. SOURCE: California State Employment Development Dept. XXV x C H y m N x ro o c M o 0 oxmc~q •n gL~t+f •nro Y ~~+ q3[n [a v°, ro c nweae F•a waom r z aw n M m c n w m R n ro} R o n c~ m a m H x n w~a~°-3 ~nn7°'x M w wwi, c °r n .yi R a r~ r~ o m m a w N o y o w}• cn o m o O n}} R O H~ H R F q £ N m } S ~ww m<ma37MN r z M:~m c o3mm }mawa mn •e o NNam •nan NO m H m• H M d dRnOC n 0 ~-+ q 'L HO Z rrm<mng7'n a r m H• a o c mdww qfD a%' w rowR 2 R H n ro fl1 Y~ H~ R fD n a f1 N m m N b m a} a n O a R r O w W Y x 3 aw wn r xo M m aw 7KK~ o cm w 0 omoa } am R } :: R n n H m s m N ON w 'G SO N R O N N O a om a n N N N N fA q z Y N m J Y •o to A Jm m W H J J W O J •O (1 [•] m W m F'mm a N Y M H N mm 01 W F•N N HH O A O ICq W mU• OF+WO d~ JAO~ UI N • m y O ~ O O O O O O O O J O U1 N J m O W A m H O} } 00} 000 W O N J010 O O •O O 'Z Od d OOd OOOA O O~ F'JJ O O O O O ~ N N w ~n q z Y V~ F+ V• N O~ 1-+ J F• m W N J VI m T (] m A UI UI O •O J m •O O M m m W O N 01 m m W m C . •~ •L- •L r v1 m AmJH m HY •G o r Hq •n ~O H A m •v o m •n m J r N A Y; p w w o O 00 OOOUI O VI Om0 O UI 01 •p H O} :100} OOOA O •O JJm O O J O $ Oa w OOa OOON O O• W Q•O O O m O O m c 'A C [•] K O .q m C K H z c, ro q ro 0 x Ii 1 ~ ~ N (n N F'F' U z q vi u~oma z m Oooory bl df 000o M M O O O O N O 1 1 1~ 5' 7 ry O N Y O b AA~00 Q z z ry m ~o ~c O O N ~v to ~o M H C 'A K Z f1 H M K z H O M x O r m C o r Ul m A M S m e p O O r o 0 M rn CO N N O K -1 m 1 H+ M to A V ro '+] M Y (] Y H m H W W 1 C N A A M N C Y r K N m I 1 a 2 m r W N z r r u m I p +. A N b NNH N (I O m m 41 J H I H to JII~JNII~ K O P N N p m A < N ~n K b O ro c+ 7 H N O z 3 M yyd ~ N W H N Nj NNtI~NN ~ ~ ~ ~ Ip 2 H N O W b O~ K O tl~ M APPENDIX J THE MEDIA A primary key to success in any major undertaking involving great numbers of people is communications. This, of course, is as true in arts programs as it is in other areas of interest. In public meetings held in connection with the State/Local Partnership Program study, in replies received to question- naires, and in personal interviews with public and arts leaders, the need for improved communications was constantly reiterated...although not always in those words. But when there is a cry for expanded audiences, this con- stitutes, in part, a demand for greater publicity to create an awareness of what is presently available in arts pro- gramming. In many other areas of concern identified by San Bernardino County residents, the underlying need for better communi- cations between arts organizations and the general public was evident. How this might be done is addressed elsewhere in this report. But when it is done--as it must ultimately be done if arts programming locally is to improve and flourish-- the newspapers and radio stations serving communities in San Bernardino County are the key. Their cooperation in publicizing the study was outstanding. In particular, the San Bernardino Sun generously donated twenty-four inches of advartising space in a Sunday issue to reproduce the standard individual questionnaire utilized in the study. This, of course, greatly increased the number of responses received, not only from the metropolitan area but from throughout the county. Following is a list by community of newspapers aid radio stations in San Bernardino County. XXVIZI THE MEDIA (CONTINUED) NEWSPAPERS Apple Valley - Apple Valley News , Big Bear Lake - Big Bear Life and Grizzly Chino - Chino Champion Colton - Colton Courier E1 Chicano Inland Hi-Liter Fontana - Herald-News Grand Terrace - Grand Terrace Tribune Hesperia - Resorter Highland - Loma Linda Bulletin News Enterprise Montclair - Montclair Tribune Ontario - Daily Report Valley Sports Review Pomona - Progress Bulletin Redlands - Daily Facts Globetrotter Rialto - Rialto Record San Bernardino - American News Pu61ic Employee Reporter Sun-Telegram Twent nine Palms - Desert Trail Victoryille - Daily Press Wrightwood - Wrightwood Mountaineer Yucaipa - News-Mirror Valley Messenger Yucca Valley - Hi-Desert Star XXIX ~ ~ THE MEDIA (CONTINUED) RADIO Apple Va11eY - KAVR Barstow - KIOT KWCT Redlands - KCAL KUOR San Bernardino - KHON KCKC KDIG KDUO KFXM KMEN KOLH KUCR KVCR Twentynine Palms - KDHI Victorville - KCIN TELEVISION San Bernardino - KVCR-TV (Channel 24) xxx ~ ~ APPENDIX K INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS Carole Deswick Redlands Rene Biane, President Brookside Vineyards Guasti Dr. Larry Burgess, Archivist A. K. Smiley Library Redlands Robert Cedezgren, Vice President/Manager Security Pacific National Bank Redlands Jo Sarqent Dutton Ontario Consuelo Eckhardt, President Conlar Associates, Incorporated San Bernardino Mayor Robert Ellingwood Ontario Sam Esrock, Owner Ontario Floor Coverings Ontario Charles D. Field, Attorney Best, Best, and Krieger Riverside Florentino Garza, President Garza, Kassel, and Jordan, Attorneys San Bernardino Alfredo Gonzales, Vice President KCAL Radio Redlands xxxl ~ ~ INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION (CONTINUED) BOARD OF DIRECTORS Maurice Goodban, Senior Executive Vice President First Trust Bank Ontario Don Grigg s, Proprietor Irv Silver's Riverside Charles Hardy, Employee Relations Operation Manager General Electric Company Ontario J. Dewey Harnish, Chairman of the Board of Directors Harnish, Morgan, and Causey, Architects Ontario Mary Harold, Administrative Assistant IBM Field Engineeirng Division Riverside J. Edward Harp, President/Director Redlands Federal Savings and Loan Association Redlands Jack Hawkins, President J. D. Diffenbaugh Company Riverside Ron B. Hentschel, Vice President/Manager Bank of America San Bernardino Sharon Hodgdon San Bernardino Warner Hodgdon Independent Financial Consultant San Berns rdino William Honeysett, President/Publisher The Sun Company San Bernardino William E. Leonard Investor San Bernardino Marye Miles, President Arrowhead Allied Arta Council San Bernardino XXXII INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION (CONTINUED) BOARD OF DIRECTORS John K. Mirau, Attorney Surr and Hellyer San Bernardino Janet Portolan, Director of Humanities Chaffey Community College Alta Loma Benjamin Rabe Redlands Les Richter, President Riverside International Raceway Riverside Da rbara Cram Riordan, City Councilman Redlands Carol Robinson Redlands Denny Shorett, President Crown Printers San Bernardino Bart Singletary, Vice President William Austin Company Riverside Dottie Smith Riverside Deen Teer Riverside Jacques Yeager, President E. L. Yeager Construction Company Riverside XXXIII . . 'J ~ r +~ '~: T0: CSTT COJ:IC?L - C1T_" OF Ra°'":i0 CU Cai.:O?~Gi., naLa FOriS:Ia he, ti:e undersigned, are resirie r.ts of the City of fi¢::cho Cuc~:;ionL;n, rosi,dtng in tk:c L;oblle I:ome Park known. ¢s plta r.a6 •~•nbi le Fank located at 10?10 ase~Lne Fd. wLere r:e r:~n s;:aces o aeco:~.edate cur ;,:o i e fiori s Due Ec contincn~ rc nt incre uses, which ¢1's: ys saev. to ezceod~the cost of 1+_+~ing in,!e:: and ~ nr.ual rat ci' inflnt ion, rve Lr_^rby ~+e t.iti on tco ^it'.y ,. i?¢t,ck~:o 'uc a:renga to enact an orcinar:ce cat ~bli ahi r.r a rent control or stabili zr;t ion boar.: to review r.ast, present. a:,dVfuture rent: incre ¢ses to determine if tk:ey are justifiable, botf: to t1~.e ocmer arci to tk:c tonart, arci if r.ot justifiable to take ti:e ne.:essarp stc_~s to rer,ed, t'..e si cuatior.. line re:.s c feel ti+.c Farl: Ctvn+~r is crt it le.i to rc aiize a re.~cnable rctc:rn from i'.is inve.^.tmrnt, tk:ere are in: tancos wimre tl of re++rn mS ~ht i.e +ern:ed ~.:nreasor:ablc, or e..=.ce;mive. ... r n;cu nuuu fi n¢r.ci:.l Y.ardcLip cn u.any cf us who ire L'virr° on•fixed _r.comes, tLat coule ca~.:ueseme of us to seek County, State~or Fe:ieral Gid, i~elccabion of our homes is ::ot t?:e a gr;a~~ as t'.e r~.la~enri on cost `~ s financially ins .rr.:our.table, cost:n~ from ":?LOG to ~`o000 de_;er.~ing o^ ;.:.e size of our homes, distance of t::e move, etc. :Fe respe.t ivlly request °our attention to tP:is matter as scon 2s px yeti cacle. .. r /i _~, ~~~~. N1~ ,1~, ~~.~ '"i~~~i ~.'~-4i.4 ' r C tG4NL ) ~ 4 ~t~ ~ J. f"~ f __ ~ i ' ~. ~` ~y ~ ~ 63 C ~~ ~- •~ .;, . p, u~-a3~ ~~~~.~-, ~~ ~ ~r r i T0; CITY COJNCIL - CITY OF P•A::C:iO CJCAI~,:O:'JGA, CALIFOP.S:IA 1Se, the undersigned, are resi«ents of tY.e Cit of Rar:cho 8ucemorx~~a, residing in the 7GObile home Park known as Alte Laguna Motile Fark locnted at 10210 Fase Lane Rd, accomodate our I,:o t e fiom s. Due o contdnting rent inIIreusos, a7ach alvueys soem to exceed the cost: of living inde; and rmr:ual rats of inflation, we Lcreby ~etition tt:e City of Rancho Cucamonga to enact an ordinance ~st~l.lishing a rent control or stabilization bonrci to review post, present ar.d future rent increases to determine if trey are ,justifiable, both to ti-:e owner and to the tenant, and if not ,justifi aUle to take tl:e necessary stc_a to rer.~ed~, t::e situation. i'J:^.e re:.s ::e feel t;:e Fark Own,~r a ent it leu to realize a re;;enable `'°~~~rn °-' c :.is irvesta:ent, t(le oti are icst arses };-ere t!:at rec~_.r:: night be termedyuna~easorable, or excessive. Ti.is ::r: aces ~.ndue financial i:ards'r:ip on many of cs who are L'vin~ on fixed incomes, ti:at could causesome oT us to seek County, State or Recieral At c. 'r.elecation of our hones is .^.ot the arEV;e_• as ti.e r~•location cost is financially ins .rr.;ountable, costing from ":?r-00 to ^;;000 de nenc.ir:[; on 1F:e size of our Y_omr s, distance of tY.e move, ote. Pie re spe .t Slxlly request dour attsntion to tics mutter as soon as practicable, /~v ~~ ~l C /G7J[i ~~,~ - .5~ Gf!~ ~+c, C6' ri'/7Q/ 1 ~ ~ ~6ti...i~ ,,, _ n G.a/ `' ~ L'a-e - ~ -GG .. ~C~a.,,~ C~ p G//76'~ . ~..n. / /O i~ /'? - 6 C7 a ~/ 6 ~<-E..,,_ f9) ~j.. ~-.v z._ /SIR /V ~ d.. =~.. < «_ ~ .~ ~ _ ~~(/...~>,~ tom. ' , r .e ~..,, a G ~-/E '~.~,,.,,z. ~~ .f6 ~~Qsc ~ Lr~ %/ ~ ~ ~~ ,~//~~ , C~ /~c 7 ~Zri/lG: / ~ i - _ /7I/ ~. / _ t v m ~. _c'XY/~ L Gt ~ G'' G% •>•d O ~h2~Lw ~ ~~,r/... :'r nA G'/H .; ~, /yNF 9G' , . ,~,. .vet n~A Ci? /~i; r t 1~ '~ C' i T0; CIT]' COJ:QCIL - CITF OF' -i1 ~/ CUCAi,:01!GA, CALIFCF{SIIA 1';e, t!:e undersigned, ~e rosidents of ti:c City of Rancho Cucamonga, res_ding in tl:c f.;obil i:ome Park lcrown s locatod at 10210 Sase ine Rd a Alta La una P.:obi park accor.odato our L:o e fiom s, * wl.crc. e.e rrn s^aces o wi:lch alerays s,;em to exceed theucost op rtinuing rent increases, rat; of inflation we :,e.. li•. Srg index: and snrual tS c: Rancho Cucamonga to enact nn orclnv;ce Est ablishtrt tanr nt control or stabilization boar;: to review rant, Rre sent a::d future rent increases to deterrxine if they are justifiable, both to t::e or+ner and to t•re tenant, and if not justifiable to take ti:e re::essay steps to rep:;ed,. t.'.e situation, VJ:,e re:.s ~,:e feel ti~:e Fark ~•m,~r is entltlec to re alive a re:enable rr.tt;rn Prom r.is im•estm , tY.ere are instances where t;:at yeti rn might be termed unreasonable, i:ards:3 excessive, Tias or~. etes endue fl nancial p on tt:any of us who are living ~on fixed _ncomes causesome of us to seek County, State or rederal Aid. Felocationld of our hcmes is ::ot the a~Sr:er as t:.e r~;locaticn cost is financially i ns~;rr.:ountable, costing rroni " cur .omen, distance of the move,•}otec ~ b000 depe r.Gi ng o; t:.e size of t're respectllylly request ;;our attention to tkas matter as soon as nracti cel:le, Ylw:` d. ul:[Jp I / ~D 1_10 1)[~Jl f., i2 f`~ 'f /('/ ~,~..~ h. ,u _ i r ..~ ~f~i/ lC'~~,lc ~~i- ~. •~.~~,.•,..., i•., ~ 0,2 /D ~ciu~a,~ ,~j * fY ~~lac ~'o-~,,«.,~ i ,dl i v ~r~~ J ~ _~~i .~~ H ~ c~ o- cal-a. `x=' ~c .:4 ' ',~a- ~ /Oaro ,,. 3 C'~ w 3'°KLL SOilI ~LLf1L! 1 ~ LI1/Lk9~ ~~~ /~~n~~ _ ~ ~!_ I / 5? . . '~ . , To: clmr cou:;cll, - crT,• o^ sa:::::o cuca:,:o;:c:A, cAi:lr• i}tr:1A ',fie, t'.:e undersi~:,ned, are reside:as of tl.e ^+ty of Ra::cY,o Cuc•:~.men~,s, ro s!dir.~ in t?:e L:obilo :,one Park 1; rown as Alts La~une. h:obile park located at 10210 ?ase Line Rri., wi.o i•~ r:e r. n s._:at•e:; o nccar.odat:. our L:o i e ~: ~r.~ s ^uo o contim.:: r.(; rant in,•re uses, wi:ich altvays suer, to exc:eec.~tbr,• conk r.f L'•.ir.~ ir,:de:: s::d ~ncuel ra'. ct inflation, r:c :.o raby ;~et it ion t':~~ ^'ty ~;' Rar:c l;o ::"uc a:nonga to enact an erCinancc :-st.::=13 sYd r..- a rora control or stabilization boar.: to raview rust, present. acd future rent ir,cre aces to ceterrrine if tLe. are +ustifi able, bot?: to t.e ormer ar:d to tie ±.erant, and if not jus t.i fi able to ta}:e t:.e ne: essary- stc;..^, to ran:ed; t:.e situation, ~li~.e: e:s :c- fool tl~.e Perk Owmr is ont.itleS to realize a re.enablo return frcm iris investment, t'r.ere arc L.st arecs w::Cre td~.at re t'. rn mi Cht be nerved unrea.<,oneble, or excessive. .. ~.~,r~. atca ncue fi nancie.l rand ^,iap on n.uny oP us who are livi r,:~, on, fiscd !.scares, tilt could c m:sesame of us to seclc rot::a. y~, Stato~or :~e:;crcQ Aic. .el~catlon of our }:o:ans is ceY• t::e arY:re:~ as ti.e r•~1~cut'.icn cost is financially ins .r;,,oun:.able, cost _n~ fro;. ":i 0~~ to "cGGO ca;:er::.L:~; o.. t,.e sSsu cT our t.emea, distance of tLe na.~e, etc. iYe re c,-:e-aitilly request ;our attention to tis cutter zs scon as practicable. i ,n - i i i; ~ j :~ ~~ C w ~ ~ l L . _ / > //- ~~ s. .ds .F Hid tl ~ '1 l ~~ ~'`~ t ~. _ f+ h ~A.U./~ ~L 1 I v/ 2~ ,: ,, , ,~- ~~ ~ >,~. - ,'h. ~ ,~ - r~~2,f ,~-~ T-?-c, ~! ~'Y'r ,a,,,.~ ~ a .u ti 1 - ~ ~ 1l ~~ ~,~. ~- ,T-_ z : c s {1. T0: CITY COJ?lCIL - CITY OP RA:.YiO CL'CAi•10?(GA, CALIr CP.liIA N:e, tk:e undersifned, are rosidents of tY.e City of Rarebo Cucamonga, rosi dingy in the L:obile iior..e Park known as ~.rn~ile p located ut in2ir ~~}}ddse Line pd_ w;.c: r~ r:e z•~•n s^aces Eon! acconodato our .:obi le Isom s,, Due to coot in; inr; rent increases, winch always s,:om to exceod the coct. c£ li';ir.C, indc;;: and ~-nnual rat. of inflation, rro hereby ;.etition ti:e f3ty~ cf Rancho ::"ucarnon~a to onset an orCinar,co ost n?•~1lahine a rent control or stabilization board to review oast, present a::d future rent increases to determine if t ey are justifiable, both to t'.e crmer and to tk:e tenant, and if r.ot justifiable to to};e ti.e necessary ste;a tc ra;,:ed,. tLe situation. Wlcere:s :e feel ti:c Park Owrrr is entitles to realize a re;:onable return Prom his investment, there are instances wY.ere t:.at ret~.rn might be *.ern:ed unreasonable, or excessive. Tk:is ~:r-: atcs ~:ndue financie.l k:ards:a p on navy of us who are living on fixed incomes, that could causesome of us to sesk County, State or rederal Aic. :relocation of our hones is riot the s~Ewe: as t::e r~locction cost is financiallg ins ;rr..oun table, cost ink from ".^, i.00 tc ;'5000 dope r...ir:~ on ti_e size of our Homes, distance of the move, etc. l'ie re c, e~a!ully request ,'our attention ~to tkas matter as soon as practi ca'olc, C : 1. ~ t~~ -- - ~; ~, ~~ -~ . ,•, ~ / ~ / j~~ /1 7 / /L ~~ LL (~'~ETG/ C(~t1.e~~~ L ~YI.,~.. ~~~_~t~17~¢ : , ~ l (Y. 7t // ~ T0: CITI' COU?vCIL - CI?'i OF' I;A:; . ri0 CUCAL:O?dGA, CAh?~ Of;?;IA 1':e, Cr.e undersir;ne d, are residents of t?.e Cit;; of i:ar:ci:o Cuc::mo n(;n, rosidir.U in t?:c L:obilo !dome Park known cs Alta Ia~xna ;"ob_le park locatod ut In^1C 'ase Line r;;,~ wt.or, c:e r•'n s;:aces o ACCJ".Od0.te' OUS` ;~:obiTa Ilom s puo`fc cont.in•,:_n~ real increases, wi:_ch zlerays soem to exceod~the cost of li':ir.~ index: and ..nnual rata of inflation, r.e i.~ru by ;~etition ti:e City cf i'. a::ci:o :'uc a:taonga to enact ar. orcinence mat c:Llishir.~ a rent control or stn?;ilizat.ion boar,: to review east, present acd fluture rent increases to detertaina if ti:ay are justifiable, bot Y: to t:.e ow:;or and to tre ter:ant, and if riot justifia?;le to take t::c r.e . essar~: stcs to rec:e d,. ti.e situatior„ Cf.^.r.±c s re feel tY.c Ferri: Orvr,:r is u.:Ci:le ' to re N.32e a rc. onxblo r.: t~r.rn Cron ;.is invectmont., tY.o ru are i::si ances w:.cre t:.;,t rei: r:.:c1g.`a be ~~,ero,:ec '.:nreasonable, or cacessi ve. _.. .:rates rn6ue fi nanci nl :~:ardsi.ip cn crany of us who are livin" cn f.isec? '.ncomes, td.at r.ould c a'.:;.esame of us to seek County, State or p'eQernl 41d. :,elccation of our hcrres 3s not the sr,gver as t::^e r~~lc~cation cost is finarcielly ins~.rc.our.+;able, cost ir.; from ".^7; U0 to "5000 co?:6n;_ir:~ e:. ?;.e size Jf our i:omfa, distance of ~tk:e move, etc, i'ie res;:e,tflrlly requc~~ur a~ter.ti~ to t::is rratter as scon as :>racticable, ~ ` ~~J r ~4ic~ ~ C.~ ~- v~ ~ ~, ~~ C~ U ~ ~~-~/ ~ G~(,r _ ~, I _, r ) ~ ~ 7' . f ~` C~ ~ ~~~~~-1~ - ~" -. ,;~~- ~' ~ ~ ~ •~ ~ 4 1. t \ I T0: CIT`_' COJ:iCIL - C.?'i 0 }'d::~ri0 C'li CAi.:Oi:GA, CA I,IFi7i2S;IA ho, t}:e uncersi~ned, are residoxas of t}:o City of Ear:cho Cuccmo nos, rosiding in tk:e L;obile i; or.,e Fark knorm es rP `a La u~na~ ":obile nark located at 7nptQ Base 71ne Rd.~ w::er~ e.e rr nt 5^.nces o ac cor.odatr, our ;,:obi le Lom s, Duo wont in:ang rent inrre ases, w}ach aivruys seem to exceed the cost of li'.ir.,g in,?e:: and nrunl rat, of inflation, roc 1.e ro by rot it.ion thr• City' c.` a!:cf:o 'uc amonCa to enact. :xn orcinar,cc ost a:.lishin~ a rcla control or stabilization boar;; to review past, present a:~.d PuturF r~:ni: increases to determine if t ey are ,justifiable, botkx to t.e ovmer ant to t}:e tenant, and iP not justifiable to take tl:c ne~~ess arc steps to rer..ed; ti~.e situation, lSi!e!u: s 'ce feel ti:e :ark Ovm ~:r is c~;tit lee to rc aline a re:~onable r~t•.:rn Prom iris inve: tment, there are inst antes wLere t!tat re,*,~rn might be terxaed um~easonable, or exec salve. Tits .: r': atcs rndue fl nssnciel ;:ards}.ip nn many of cs wY:o are Livin'~ on fixad ~.ncomes, ti_at could caueesome of us to seek Cou:;t,y, ~State~or Federal Aid. i~.elccation of our homes is not the ar Swe;• as t:.e rr~locat inn test is financially ins:rc:our, *,able, cost ink from "3:00 to Y5000 dei,e m:ir.~_; o:, cLe size cf our i:omrs, distance of tte move, etc. l'ie respe~;ttully request dour attention to tkas matter es soon as practicable, ,~ ~/ tic./ ~ ~~ ~ r-ct- ~~~~vl~' , i~. . ~ n , ~"' ~, ~ r:~ 4r~ccL' . -Cher ~ -~ ,-e ~.~ ~ ; > >~. ; _u . ti ~,~ - ~~ . , ~G4,ch~ '' Z{7iv i ~. t ~ p 7 ~ .~~ -JGiv~Gf' ~ . G _ i l y C T0: CIT1' COUNCIL - CITY OF F;A:v ~;F!0 CUCAi,:ONGA, CALL=vv"R,SiLA 17e, the underslEned, are residents o£ the City of Rancho Cucamonga, residing in the t5obile Iiomo Park known as Alta Laguna :~;obile Park located at~ 102 0 rase Line Hd.. wi:ero ere r:•n s?aces o accor,odate our n:o6i e fion~-I s: Duc"~o continuing rent increases, which always soem to exceed the cost of living index; and :mrual rat.• of inflation, we i.ereby petition t':c City of Rancho !'ucamonga to enact an ordinance cat a:llshinc a rent control or stabilization boars to review past, present acdvfuture rant increases to deterr,:ine if t'.:ey are dust ifiable, both to the ovmer and to tine tenant, and if not Justi£i aLle to t•~ke the necessary stc ps to rc-::,ed;, t::e situation, 1V ere: s : e feel tl•:c iar•k Own: r is eytitle r. to realize a reronable return :'rom :3s invnstmnnt, there are i.nst.ances wY,ere t:,at rel.i rn m1~ht Lo lorned ',~n:ron:: o:;eble, or ex.cessi ve. Ti.ic ~.r~ nh:a inuuo fi nunci ul i:arrisi.ip on many of us who are IS v1ni; on fixed l.ncomes, ti.at could r,aueeseme of us to seek Cour:ty, State or rederal Aid. C:elocation of our hones is ::ot tae a:-$rer as ti:e r.>locat ion cost is financially ins~,rn:ouncable, eoatinc; from '?i OO to ~,"000 depe n:.iz:~ on tLe size c£ our Y:omes, distance of tl:e move, etc, lSe re ape:atully request ,our attention to this mutter es aeon as practicable, ~~ ~y ~ ~: _ ~t'Y sr "i ~NL ~~~ ~L ~ i ~ n ~~~ ql ~i ~µAl >n •0~v~~ _ ~ G ~ ~~ ~~ is N i •ri ~ . \ . T0; CITY COU "iCIL - Ci T'_/ OF• PA:: CF:O CUCAi~:O?1GA, CALIFCRSiIA P;a, the undersigned, are residents of tY.e City of ftancLo Cuc:;monga, residing in the t,;obile Homo Park known as Alta La• { located at 0 ~10 'ase Line Rd. wi.ere rve rrn spaces o ac eor,odate our ?•:~ile 13 om s Du`e`to coat inning rent incre eses, which always seem to exceed the tact of li•: ir.~ inCe:: and ~.nnual rat. of inflation, re i.eraby ,~etit.ion ti:e City' e£ I?ancho ('uc amorga to enset an ordiuanca estal li^,hinr a reia control or stabilization boar.i to review past, present ar.d future rant: increases to deterrr,2ne if they are justifiable, both to t}:e owner and to ti:e tenant, and if not justifiable to take ti:e necessary steps to rer;ed; t}:e situation, Lv:.e r•ess e.e feel the Fark Own•.~r is emit led to rc nlize a re::ooable retL:rn Prom ias investment, there are instances where t:`:at rett.rn might be termed unreasonable, or excessive. Ti,is ~.r~~ates :;ndue financial hardship on many of us wi:.o are l: vine on fixed Incomes, ti:at could causesome of us to seek County, State or Federal Aid. :.ele cation of our homes is riot the a:~3v;e:• as t:.e r~.~location cost is financially ins.rmouniable, eostind Tram ',,^,i 00 to ,'"5000 depending or, t.}.e size of our homes, distance of the move, etc, i!'e respeattully request ;;our attention to this matter as soon as practicable. ~~.rc i1^ .~, i _7i ~7--- :~~~ u.-:~~. ~~~k~-e-H C. ~~7~.,., L ~7. ~/ ~~1~"~ J ,: C' r" //L _/ 1 ~" C~ C`Z/ /I y! T0: CiTY COL`SCTL - C. T'>.' 0? lid:;:.I:O CUCAG:C?(GA, CAi,I FC RF.IA '.^;e, the undersigned, are residents of tilc City of Rar:cbo Cuc•ano n~a, resiuir.E in t'.:e t.:obile Bone Park A:roem as Alta iapuna ;;obile Fark_ located at 1C^!0 ' ase Line fid, w;.erc r:c r: v: s?aces o aC CGI'rPdat.' Out` J.O A B i.Onl DI1C O cont.im:_ng rent inc:re aces, wiSc?i alw::ys s:;em to erce o::~thr, cost. of li'. ir.~ in1e:: anct .nr.ual rat. of inflation, we i.r•reby ;~etition t'.:e cty~ cf f;ar.cl~:o 'ucrnnonE;a to enact. an ordinarce ..utwLliaY:ir.~ a rent control or stabilization bonri to review oast, pre Dent, ar.d future rent increases to deterrnine if ti:~;; are justifiable, both to ti:e ewrer and to ti:e tenant, and if r.ot justi£iaU1e to take ti:e ne pessary steps to reined, t;_e situation. :iha revs re feel ti:e F,rk Ocm:r is eni;itle;i to realize a rcw.~onable rotran ?rpm ;;is in•;cstme nt, tk:e rc are instances w ere t;~a re±+. rn !niEht ~ee '.err;:e r. :; r.ressora.ble, or er.cessive. Pi.ic .:r ntes ~.nuuo fi nand c.l ::erdsi:i on r:any of us who are livin~~ on fixed incomes, ti.at could c a'.:se's c:.:e of us to seek CoL; rt:y, State, or Fe dez•al Aic. Lelocation of our t;omcs is ;:ot tiie arswe:; as t e r~ location cost is financially ire ~r;;.oun*.able, costin; from ':?i On to "5000 de ne n,:ir.~; o:, id.e size of OIII` :=Gmc9, di st arme of ~t}:e move, etc. e:e re spe:,t rally request dour attention to t:-_is mstter as scon as practicable, ,~ 1 ;:,,: . . , 'I ,.',.; r.,~ f'+~;+ ~~,~..~' ~/ t ~~ ~ueis t3'.. :a i. • ~ J I/.tG~~i~-Jtt~~ -jam I i . s. ~! ~. : +~~ _ / - ` / f; 7 Y Ul a ' ~ /J it ~~ v~. i ~,i' y -. •~ J i •99 ~ / X599 ` ~ ~+;i T0: C1TS CO^I'iCIL - CITY 0? RA:iGFO CUCAhObiGA, CALIFCRS:IA i';o, tl?e undersigned, are residex;ts of tfe City of P.ancho Cuc;:monga, rosidirg in t're 1.fobile hone Park known as t ,• located at 1270_ se Tine Rd., wirer, r:e x°•n s~, xrces o nccor.odatr our "o ~~ e liom s Duc~cout lnuing rc nt Sm:reuse:;, wiach always soem to exe~ed~tho cost o£ 11vir.^, in;ie:: ar.d ~: nrual rat. of inflation, we Y:urr by ;etit.icm ti:e City cf nee}:o ~"ue amonra to enact, ar. or,ii nanco ost d.•li shim a rent control or stabili zat.ion boar.. to review cast, present ar.d future rant increases to deterrnine if tire} are justifiable, both to t're owner and to tha tenant, and if r•ot justifiai~~le to to}:e ti:e ne:;essarg stz;ro to ren~ed; t::e situation, l'r e:~e:s :c £eol td:e Park Or+n:~r is entit lee to realize a re::onable rn t:;rn ^rom iris investment, there ar•e L:stances wl.ere ti.at ret.: rn might be ter:::ed [.n:°easonable, or excessive. Ti.is ~. .r~~atcs unduo finnncial i:ardsi:ip on sar.~y of us who are livi n~ on fixed _ncomes, that could cauresome of us to sock County, Stare or Fereral Aic, I,elecation of our hones is not the a.~SV;e:• as t::e rail c~cat inn cost i.^, financially ins.r::.oun table, costi.n~; ?'rom °.^.i 00 to "SOCO cepe r.;:i n~ e:. ':.e size oS our k:omes, distance of tf:e move, etc, Pie respe.a:ally request dour attention to t_is matter as soon as practicable. (i'ua, 7:. ..x,,- L{ ~V„ 9 ._s~~i.i_4 tc_~ l ..• y ~, J _.y,,.;,~~ ~ , ,~ ~. ~~ , C T0: CTTS CJII;'ICIL - CITY 0:' YA.;: i:0 Cli CAl:OIiGA, CALL: CBSiIA 1';e, tLe uncorsi~ned, arc roslrier;ts of ti.c City of Itar:et:o Curano n(;a, ros idir.~ in tLe L:obilc I:or..e Fark I:rown as .hlta Lanma ::obile Fark loc atad at 10?10 Sase Line Rd_,i wLr r~ r:c r•a-. s~^aco:, o accar.edat:: our E:oTii~Fr a;; Duo" o ont.inu!nL rent Sncreuses, tvi',i c:^. always seem to exec ed•tiv; coot c£ li~:ir.~ index: a::d ~ nnual ra! of inflation, r+o r.r reby _et it ion t!:c• C. 1: ;; cf' I?ancho iuc nmen~a to enact nn ordnance ont d: lisYu r.r a rent control or stabilization boar: to review vast, present. ard~future runt incre uses to determine if bi;e ~; are gust ifS able, botkr to t!.e owner urd to ti:e tenant, and if r.ot justiflah le to take ti:e r.c::essary step:: to reused, ti.e situation. iY'i:e: e: s rc fora t.l ~.o Fark Own~m is entitle,! to realize n re:~onable rct;trn ?'rom i'.is in /octmunt., tl:e re are i:~,sLancos wi:ore t!.at re `.i rn micht. to +er;.:ed Gn~~casc!:eble, or excessive. .. ,a ~Qtcs ~,.rriue Si nnncial i~-ardsisip on many of us who are 1_vinr or,~fixed l::come s, ti:at could c a~,;:;esor.:e of us to neck Ccunt.y, State or 'r eeieral A'_d, I,e lccatSon r:f our homon is aot the a~~Swer as tl.e rl:cation cost is financially ins~,r::.oun~able, eontin~° from ':`: Oi: to ~.'b000 dapern.int; a• ~. i.e nitro oS our ].omen, distance of tLo move, otc, C:e renpe:'asully request ;;our attention to +.::is matter es neon as ;;racticatle. ~;i / 7 d;<- ~ ~ G /^ ~- ~ 7`- ~ /~~ ~ 9 c ,r'! ~ ~, -rf ., % j , y-~' '~lC d'u~~ u ~G~'`Cli,c '-' Y I %~G't ~ ^ U' h -J' r; J ` ... lc7 ~I ~' % .,.v iJl .. }.tN.v .y ~~ii~~ ~ t~.~rs' ~z . ~ r ,/ ( ~ r:.,~(, ov l7 y~+. r ! :pI„~ ~~ ,( ~ ~- ;% T0: CITl' COJ^;CIL - CIT° 0 AA::; iC0 CUCAi.:OSiGA, CALItOFP:IA ?':e, the undersigned, are. resider. t•s of the Citg of Rancl~+o Cuc~,mo nt,a, ras ldin~ in t!:c t.:obile !ioc.o Fart, known cs Alt,a Leguna i.:ot±±le Park located ut o 10..1Q ease Line F~'. w}:er. r.e rrr. sates o acccr,oc?atr, our 1,.oFS le i:oni s nue to coat inu _n[; rant ins:re aces, wr._ch al;~::gs soar.. to er.ceud~the cost of li•.:irg rode:: ar.d ~ nr.u:a rat. cl inflation, we ?:crr by ;~ut it.ion tia~ ~ity~ ~!' i'.ar.ci~o ~ttc n:non[;a to enact an or,:inanco rat ..: ].ishi r.~ a rant eont.rol or• stabi lizat.ion boar: to review past, present acd future rent, increases to determine if the;; are justifi. able, both to t}:e owner arci to t}:c tenxrt, and if r,ot justifia'.~~le to tab:e t':e ne::essxr;~ stc;a to re:: .ed, ti.e situutior.. l'uhwr s ;.c feel fire Fuck Mvr,: r i:: c:a it log'. to realize a re.~enable rc t';rn ?'tom i.is invc stmont, there are inst antes wi:cre ti,at re1,'. rn iai Eht be -e~cred ~.. r._~easoneble, or excessive. Ti~,is .:r~. atcs ,~,nrue fi nar.ci.•.1 i.nrdsi.ip on u.any of us who ore 1'virr~ on fi aoc? incomes, that r:ould c nu<esor.;e of us to seok Cou;rl:y, Stare or Fecicrnl Aid. Lra~cation of our hones i., not the a-Svice:~ as t!:e rcl ocat:ion ecst is financially i ^ss;:,oun: able, coot in,- froul °•.: (:fi {;c ':000 Bono rn..i;,.i. r '. :'e :: i:ae t,f our !:owes, iiiutonce of t7:e move, etc. C:'e rec?teat:vlly request ,our attert ion to t::is totter as scon as practicable. /. + .Yr ,~ ~ n ~~ ' ~ ~:~ :k- Z. -~ . y! r ._ . .; ~ ~.~~ .i i/ YYS C.i _ ~ ' /..C' ~ ~ j r- ~ ~: ~~.. ~ 'r ,. r~ T0: CITF CCt4iCIL - CITY OF RA':~ri0 CUCA:,;O?CGA, CALIcv^kP:IA Ore, tl:e uncarsiLne d, aro rc si<ients of ti.e City of Rar:cho Cuc :monga, ros?din?; in the *,:obile Bore Park known as Alta~a~una ;'obile Park locatoci at LO^10 ?;ase Line Fd, wLma. qo rrn~.ace;:-£o -"' aecer~odat~:, our i.:o zL"Ie`k;om s ue o continuing rent increases, which elv; uya sear.. to exc•.eed~the cost of li•: ir.~ index: and cnr-ual rats of inflation, ere 7.ereby petition to .^,ity cf i'.arml:o fuc amon~a to enact ar, or::i nance osta:•lishl r.r a rent control or stabilization boar:: to review past, present. a..d future rent ir,crc r,ses to cet.errrina i£ tee ,, are Justifiable, both to the cerner anti to tY.e !erant, and if not Just i£1 a::ale tc take ti.e r:e ::essarg ste.?!s to rcc.eu; ti.e situation. 1T~ere rs •:e feel ttx Par2c Oc+n:r is ent it lsJ to rc nlize a re:;onable return from :as investment, there are icrt antes ws.ere tt~,at yeti rn miUht Le Bern:ec ~.: n:~casonablo, or excessive. T!,is .r~. at.:a ~~neiue fi nanci c.l i-:zr<isiSp on ;carry of us who ara 1iv?.n„ on fined Incomes, t?.at could caucesome of us to seek County, State or FeP.©ral Aid. F.elecation o£ our homes is not the a. fN~or as t:~.e rolocat ion cost is financially ius ,rc.oun*.able, cost:n~ fron, ":;;.GO to ~'SGUO de ~;ecu:i n~ c;. t.2<e sizo of our homes, dintar,ce of the move, etc, fie recpe,a:lxlly request our attention to ttas rsstter as scon as practicable, r ~' ~~~ i~~' X02, J_1 ~ ~ An23 IiL L \, 1 1a ,~°c~ ~ l - ~ ,~ ~~ 9 07/ ~j ,~-y, // a CJ. (rt7~ ~J 2 s z f~ Sr y J2 "~c ~ ~ ' ~ ~tirol~ ' YZ . /, .. (\l• T0: CITY COU:;CTL - CITY OR Rp::;,:!0 Cti Cpi~:OiCGi., CpLIr`ChT:Tp ',Se, t}.e undersigned, are rvsictexas of ti~:c City' of $anC2Y0 Cuc;:mo n~a, residing in the f.:o611e I;omo Fark l: rown as pl«s La~7yp~'"r_'le =„rtr locatod ¢t 10310 5ase Lane P.d „ w?vr~: ;;e runt senses o acconodata our ;,:o e ?: on s. Duc. to contiman~ rent 1x; creases, which alrn:ya s.;er.. to exceed tiro cost. of li ~. ir.~ rode:: and ~.nrual rat~.~ of inflation, pe r.r reby petit.ion t::o Ci t;; cf ??ar.cl:o "uc amonga tc enact. an orciincmco cot::i lishir.~ a rcr,Y, control or stabilization boar.`. to review rant, present ar.d f~.rture rant increases to deterr.;ine if ti:ey are justifiable, both to t:~.e avr,er at:d to the tenara, and if not. justifiably to take t?:e r.e.:essary stc;;s to re~:~er., tJe situation, ', v.~e:s 'rc feel ti:e Fark Crm rm is er,t it le,i to realize a re:~oaable roturn from is s invest¢ent, there are instances where that retr rn mig,Y.t be tern:ec t;nrcasorable, or excessive. This :~.r.atcs endue fi earcir.l i_ards:.ip on :navy of us who are livi r,'~ on fined incomes, t::at could c ausesor..a of us to seek Cox:nty, Stat e~or 'ecieral Gi d, P.elccation of our homes is riot the a. SV;e:• as t::e r^location cost is financially ins•:ru.oun?able, cost in;, from Y'^r 00 to "OOG cone n::i.^.~ o: ±i:e size cS our i:omvs, distance of the move, etc. fie re speotfaxlly request dour attention to tr.is matter as scon as practicable. G'{'~G~L G~'~G/'w =J1.s-e.t 7..1 /1~ ~' a of ~1~,~.r..~- E~ ' `; a~ t ~~ ~ ~ ,,~ 'i z ru-, " ~ , r ~ ~ ^ ~ -- - v /a...l,- ,d~~~~ T0: CITS COU'.dCIL - CIT"_" Op' F:A:: (.130 CUCAL:OIdGA, CALL: OP,LiIA lSe, tl:e undersigned, are reside nts cf fr.e City of Rancbo Cuc:::ao rxVa, rosidin,; in the L:obile home park knovm ns Alta Laguna ^;:ebile Fark located at 1C'?10 Base Line Ad. vrl.cx~.. Fe rc~n~ s^nces o accor,odatr, our ;.:o x. a Isom s Due o coot incin~ rc rt in~:reases, w2:ich always soenm to exceed the cost of li•:ir.D Sn.!e;: ar.d ,.ncuel rat. of ir:flat ion, ivc hereby iutition to C`.ty c Panct:o :uc an:enga to enact an orci nar,ce ast a:.lishir.~ a rant control or stabilization boar.: to review east, present acd future rrnt. increases to determine if ti.ey are justifiable, not Ya to ti:e owner and Lo ti:e tenant, and if rot justifiable to tnl~:e U:e ne.:essary stc;;s to rec:ed, t'.e si.tuation. 17::c revs '.c feel tce Fork Crm:~r is ent it ler to realize a re:~onable rct~~.~~rn -'rom i'.is investment, t'r,e re are inst ancos where t:.at re r,i rn r.;i Eht l,e termed ~.,n.~casorable, or excessive. Ti.ia .:r_atcs .;ndue finecr:cie.l i:arrist.ip on n;any' of us who ore 1S vin° on fixed income s, tLat could cau:.esome of us to seok Co•mty, State or F'edcrnl Aid. i:olocation of our }xo:nes is rot ttae arSre;' as ti:e r~1:~cat,ion cost i:: financiell.y .i u:: rr,oun'nblc, ar:ai ~n,- ''r.,m ":: nt: be rCkID :a~;~orn ,. ~, •: c ::; :'.e ~f 6lir LOlnl:a, dl nLaO CC of t:.c tt:GVe, i~tC, l!'e resraaiully request ;our attention to t:as r.'::.tter es soon as practicable, a: ry ~'/y po Lt P~^a / 1 ~ / ~ : r • ~ "~ ~` 1 a~fldhr4 ~~.'< `' ~ ~a~ r J~W7~ : ; ~: L ~Y~4-Z r/~$..L_Y_Y~.t...-4--- r i (<:-~ u, i ~C>I , :.; {tia:~c .c: ,. ~, r ~ ~ ~„~~~~2 win n T0; CITY COUI:CTL - CITY OF' RA:: •~:i0 CUCA3:0?;GA, CALIFCRP:IA l';e, tae undersigned, ere residents of tY.e Cit}• of Rancho Cuc::monga, residing in tk:e L:obile i:ar.,e Park known as Alta Laguna Ltobile Fark located at 1021C Base Line P.d., w:.cYi, r:o ron s?ncas-~~o acca~~odato our L:o x e from s. D-- uo ~o cont.im:ini; rent increases, wi;ich always seom to exceod the coat of lis irg inde;: and •:nrual rat.. of inflation, we i.cr~a by ?~ctit.ion ti: r` Oity c f' Rancho 'ttc amonk;a to enact an oreinarc© Est a:,lishir:~ a rent control or stabilization boar:i to review nast, yresent ar.d future rent; ircreases to deterraine if ti:ey are ,justifiable, botk: to ti.e owner and to tk:e tenant, and if not justifi aLle to take ti.e na,:essary stc k;s to raced; tl.e sltuatior,. 1V::erea ':e feel the Fark Own:r is entitles to realize a re::onable rett;rn .rom :.is investment, tY.ere are instances w'rere that ret,t rn might be cern~.ed '~:n-seasonable, or ex. ressive. .. :r -atrs ~~.ndue financial i:erdsi:ip on many of us who are li vi n;~ on fixed incomes, t;_at could cac:.esome of us to seek Coz;nty, State ~or Federal Aid. i~,elccation of our hones is not the a~sc;er as t:.e r 1ecn8ion cost is financially ins~~r;;:ouniable, costinc.; fron ~:'.; 00 to ;'x000 cepenr.inG or. rLe size of our Yomes, distance of tY.e move, etc. 1'de respect!ZZlly request ~-our attention to tk3s natter as soon ss practicable. ' ~~ I I ~~ Cc ~ ~~ ~. ~~,..t. :o ;~1~.~ ,~ ~zr ,.~. ~i i,~ l~...:~ r Cl ~ ~Y'L 4L`~C ~~'~~/~_ / '- /__ //,, //~ //// i r ~ ~ is (~.t!a /Cc.~~~ ~.. (r/ ( r ~ ' ~ 'Ff 4 '' ` C [ /. / ~. L Y ~ LiG 'u Z.i C" ~~,. ~. ~~ ~ ; . ~ y ..-~ n ~ ~ // ~~ Y~ ~ ~~Ci~[~I 'L'f LCG •. ~ / r / •~ l C ~'. ' T0: CITY COU'7CIL - CI?Y 0° PA:"ii0 L'UCA6i O?:vly CA L? OP.NIA f;e, the andorsigned, are reside raa of t?.e City of Rar.eLo Cuc,:mo n};a, residing in t?:e L:obile IIOtee Park known as Alta La una -:obile Park locatr.d at 10^10 Sase Line F.'d...~..~_~ w'r.r, r. r,e r•~n sane c:; o ne ec:~odat~ ouz• :,:oT~IIe 1:ort s Duo Co cont.inu ink rent inere ttsen, which always s.;em to exr.eud~the cost of li•: ir,C, Inds:: and .nnual rnt,• of inflation, c+e i.a xa:by ;:;tition t.:•:c .r.tty <!' }t ancho ~uC ataon(;a to enact an ordinance cst aLlishin~ a rent control or stabiliant ion bona`. to review past, present acd future rrnt: ir.cre aces to determine if t'.:ey are iustifi able, both to ti:e owner arr, to ts:e tenant, and if rot justi Pi able to take t~:e re cesear~ stc ns to roe.ec; t:.e situation. ~'v`•r,:rs :~e feel ti.o nr): Owner is entitled to rcali ze a re:~orrtbie rcC~,tr•n Prom ;as invr.atnunt, t!'.cre are i:::a rmees wt.ere t;,at ret~ rn uSent be termed ,; rreas oneble, or es cessive. .. ~:r~~etos ::ndue fl nar.cial i:ardship on :;:uny of as who csc- livin°_, on fi:ced Lneomes, that could cac;:esome of us to seek County, State~or i~edoral P.id. i.elocatdon of our hones is ::ot the a:-trre:• as ti:e r•~locat Son cost i:: finnncially ins .rr.:our.*,able, costing trot.: ".., 0.! to ''';1000 .ieperc.ir.~ o:: cLe lice of our ho, res, distance of t}:e move, etc. fie respe,tfltlly request ,our attention to tics natter as seen as uracti cable. -Q- I ~i C% 999 / ~J GLnev`vl, ~ C<-rCL v /, r 'u.<-t a' /;In : ,/ , 2/L~" ~~• C f_ L T0: CITY COII:tCIL - CITT 0? i~,d:: LiiO CL'CAi•:C2^,C.^.. C6L?FCP:i:Ixi {".e, tP.e undersi~re d, are residex;ts of ti:c City of fiar:cY,o Cuc;:mo raga, residing in ti:e :,;obilo i:ome Park ]mown as Alta La,~un~a~*~b~i~l~e Park located at Wi.e x•.. r:e r:mt s^aces acce:~~.odate our :^o _ e !:om•s. Due. o coat inuf r.[, rent increases, wi:_ch always soem to eacood the, cost cf li •: ir. indn:: a.^.d ~.,nrual rat of Snflat ion, we i.cre by ict it.icn tiu• ,City' c1' i?arc Pro Puc nxncnga to enact an orcinarce ~stc:Lli shim a rent control or stabilization boar:: to review past, present a~-.d Tuture rant incre aces to determine if t'ne, arc lustifi able, both to t}.e owner and to the tenant, and if r.ot justifiable to take t:.e ne::essarv ste>s to re:~ed,. t::e situation. 'ii::e;re~ s : e feel t.i;c Parl: Owr.: r i n o:;title,i to realize a re:~onable rctnrn t`rom i.is investmr.nt, there are inst anccs where t!~at rer,; rn r.ii~ht bo 'ermed c:r.:~easonablc, or er. r:ecsi ve. .. rat c:. ~ miue fi nnx:ci:~.l .. _.~si.ip on i:,any of us cd:o arc l.: vi n:; on. S'.iacd 'c:cov,e s, ti.at could c a:a:.eser..e of us to seek Cot;,^,ty-, State cr r^cueral Aic, i elocation of our homes is ::ot t:^.e a°ae:er as t!-.e r~~locatian cost is financially ins':re:our. *.able, cost _n~ from "..^.r-00 to `::GGO de ne r.Lir.O cr: ii:e size of our homes, distance of tY.e move, etc, lYe reepeotfully request dour attention to ±i.a otter as scon as practicable, c v ~ ~~ ( ~ ~~ c C ~ C-~O ~ ~Pn ~>?~ `art ~i ~~E? ~~-,~- i/ ~~ ~ n j~~ //~ '! Z / ~ ~ t/ ~ .v-<.n..c.- ~ ;y~.• x~ ~'. r /3„~ k ,9 '~ T0: CITY C!v!^;CIL - CITI' 0' HAI: ,"i:0 CUCA,iCOIdGA, CALIFvHkiIA l'Pe, ti:e undersigned, are residents of tY.c City of Rancho Cur;mo nga, residinG in the k:obile Hor..e Park 1:nown es Alta Laguna t'obt le Park locatod at~1R ^'77ase. Line Rd. _ _ wi:er+. r:z rnn s?aces o acce:aodatc our i`.ob~le l.om s, ue o continuing rent increases, wi:ich always soem to exe.eed the cost of living index: and :.nrual rat, of inflation, we hereby ::etition tire City c" i;auct:o ^ucamonga to enact an ordnance cst~blishin~ a rent control or stabilization boar:: to review past, present a;:d futur: rani: increases to deterrnine if theq are justifl able, both to tr:e ormer ar.<i to ti;e tenant, and 3f not Just.id atle to take the ne~~essar•- stet's to rented, t}.e situation. 1V.:e re: s r,o feel ti:e Fork Owm~r is ert it le;i to realize a re;~onable retv;rn from i_is investment, ti:ere are instances vv1':ere ti:at re r, ~, rn migtt be termed `.ceasone.ble, or excessive. q'i.is s~: ales ,moue fi narcial :;ard. s:~.ip on ;:.any of as e+ho are isvine on fixed _ncomes, ti:at could caueesome of us to seek County, State Vor Federal Aid. ::elccation of our homes is aot the arsv;er as ti:e r•~~l.cat icon cost is financially ins :r:aoun *,able, cost ink from ".^-:~00 to :`5000 derencir:~ o^ t.i.e size of our homes, distance of tY.e move, etc, }:+e respe~tiltlly request „our attention to this m;:tt er as soon as pre,cfi cello, ~L< vC i ?c ? ~ ' ti . a , f~< ~ 1.: t r C -- e:< _:. ~ .., 6r /• _ / ~ . a. ,~ t i~ ~ ~ • ;+ fy~do~ %, u . ~-..c C ~ i . u t,- .~ ' l ~. ~ l.~ ~. y ~ , i • ` ') ~~~ I ~ V i• x it i -~ T0: CITY COL4CCIL - CI^tY OF P,A:::. f:0 CIICAf,:O?;G+:, CALIFCRS:IA ~;e, ti:e undersi;;ned, are residents of ti:e City of Rar:eLo Cuc::mo nUn, ros`ding in the Liobilo home Park 3:nown as plt r. La uns :'obile Park to catod at~;_?10_.. r1 ~e Line Fid.. witm•~. ue rrn s^aces o acecr;odate our 1:oUUt e :om s Due o continui nG rc nt Snereusea, which always s,;em to ea:necd~the cost. cf li vir,~ incie:: and ~.nrual rn! of Snflnt inn, r+e 1: pro by ~r.tii.lon t::o .^, ~. t.y <~:' ?iancho "ucamonga to enact an or~_inance ~,st;::lishix:~ a rota control ot• stabilization boar,: to review past, present and futux•e rani: here aces to deterrni ne if t eg are ,justifiable, both to t::e o4lner and to the terart, and if not ,justifiable to take t::e n e.;ess ar}~ stcna to re~:~ed, t;:e situation, Gv"ne~~e:s e feel the Parl< Owner is ertit le,7 to realize a re:~enablo ret~::rn from iris investment, there are instances were t':nt return rd~Y.t be termed unreasonable, or ex^_essive. .:is ~.:r~_ates rndue financial i.arcisi:ip on many of us who are 1`vin•; on fixed incomes, ti:at could causesor.:e of us to seek County, Statc~or Federal pie, i'.elocation of our homes is not the ar seer as the r~.locat ion cost is financially ins.r::.ountable, cor,tin,; fro::. '..^.r 00 to ''x000 ~eper,~.ir.~ o:: !:.e si::e of our Y.omes, distance of the move, etc. Cie recpe.;tittliy request ;our attention to ti.is matter es scon as practicable, ~' , f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , !.>. t.L. c C --- l _ .. y ~ _-LL/L... ~ y C ~~ r ~..Q-il o~ ~ ;"1 ~Ci. ~ t Ce •- / : %./+ J= / ' S i~~l J~~ ~~-+~ J r/ ~/ i -A f ~,9 ~`t •G °l , l.. + ~,. ~ / +~~ `I C~ I /AJIe .,.^ .~_ L ~ 11. '-- ~ 4 ~~ GG t ~~<, c,~c:~~,. !~~ r~ ~~ ~~ i~~ 2/1~ ^~ ~{ ~~ ~r \5. --~~ T0: CrTY COti `-ICIL - C_TY OF k;A:: f.PO CUCAb:O?:OA, CALIFCP,kilA l';e, the undersigned, are residents of tk:e City of RarcLo Curnnon(;a, residing in t?:e L;obile Eorro Park known es Alt a_L_aFUna_i~obi le Park locntod utase Line Rri wk_cr.. e:e ron s?aces o acecr~odate our o i e Fiom~-- s-Due--f.e continuing rent increases, wiach always soem to exceed the cont. of li~.ir.~ index: and ~:.nr,ual rat' oS inflation, e;e ao Toby petition tiro City cf i%nr,ci:o 'ucamonC;a to enact an or,:inance cst a:~llshir.~ a rcrt control or stabi ll zat ion boar,i to review past, present ar.d future rent inore ases to determine if they are justifiable, both to ti:e owner and to t'r:e tenant, and if not justifi a4e to take ti:e ne;:essary stc;,s to raced; t:.e situation, L'!:^.e; e:s r,e 1'eo1 tP:c °ur]< Own::r is entitle,; to realize a re;.oaable ret~.±rn from iris investment, thero pre instances wi:ere tl.at re t: rn migYrt be !ern:ed ~,: r.:~casorable, or excessive. This ~: r~: ales ,:ndue financir.l k:aresiap on many of us who are living on fixed incomes, tk:at could cau~esome of us to sock County, State or F'c.ieral Aid, i.elecation of our homes is ::ot the a: ivaer as t7:e relocation cost is financially ins•.rc~.oun, sble, cost Sn~ rrom ":?c 00 to "5000 depe r. r.ir:~ or: !.},e size cf our hcmrs, distance of tk:e move, etc. Cie re c;.~e:.tRtlly request dour attention to tkas matter es scon as practicable, -~ .~ ` ~daac.` ~/~( ~•(.~.,G. C C-z l~ ,~a',;r''~Cr~l4 1 Ce °~~1'~~~r.« l ~/l'/nf ~- - ~ a- lo,C->'~v~x.~' 1;'s"' lrF.(.c a. ~~ %/7D _ .. _.... C /C ~l,rr i r. a7~ ~ ,. C iCG..C-~ ~'ma-/~!. l,_. /7G/ 1 ~ - -- -1~- = ;- ~ ri; . ;; /~' ~~ ,--~ ~ ~ ~ / I . r /- x1,_ i -- llI ' % ~ .i ~,~ i .' T0: C1TT CJU:;CIL - CiTS 0 f;A:: (. ri0 CUCAi;OiiGA, CAL?: vP,P:2A }';e, t7:e urdersi~r,e d, nrr: rosicic nts of ti.c City of Raucho Cuc~.:nonE;a, rosSdint; in t'.:e (.;obile I:ome °ark ]mown as locat~u at L.i nom. ~~- w1.~:rr r:e r~~: sr:nru;; o nc eu~~~oua t; our i~'o i r~l:om :; !lu'u-~cii:a im:!n~ rt,nt. incre us o::, w•ilch always s<•en to excecd~thc cost of li•.Sr.C, roue:: ar~d .nr.ual rat of .inflation, r;e iti~ruby ;~gtit.ion t.i.r City c?' I?ar.cho :'uc amon(;a to enact an orra narce est..=~li sl-c.t:r a root control or sta'oi llzaCion boar:i to review cast, present. ar.d Suture rent: increases to determine if tLe~~ are justifiable, both to tite owner arc: to t'rc tenant, and if cot justifiat~le to taA:e ti:c necessary ste ~s to ren~~.ec, tt.e situation, Gi='.o: c ~ '.v Peal 1'i'q For:: nv+r.~ r i.; r.1:1 it It ~: to ran! J::e a rr:ronnblo r:.t nrn~!'r~em i.is invustmrmt, ti.u ro a_r t:at ancus tvi.are t:.::t re L: rn u1E,Y:t Le +err::ed '~;r.:~easot:able, or er.cessi ve. ... .:r~ atoms r.ndue £i narcic.1 i:arrin:.ip on r.:any' of us who are 1; vi r: ~~, on fL:ed _r:comes, ti.at could caucesome of us to seek County, State~or F'eleral Aid, i.olccation of our hones is r:ot the .r~4mer as t?-e r~locati on cost is financially ins .rr.oun r.able, cost: n~. tror.~: '.,: 00 to "::000 Ce pe r.,:in~ ...• ii:e si::e cf our hom<a, uistance of t:e move, etc. ite respe aZUlly request ,our attention to tk_is r.;xtter as soon as practicable. w. Wig` ~' R-i L~ ~~.,-,tz~,~«~t~~ rz.~..~, dP.~~,-~~ ~~ ~._~~- f ---, ~t~~~, ~~~ ~ ~~ti t `J T0: C1TS CC;!i:CIL - CITY 0.•' t A:: l0 CL'CAi~:O':Gt,, CALL: Cf;S;lA Pie, t e undersigned, are residents of ti,e City of Ha::cho Cuc amo ros l,~Iing in t?:e L;obilo I'or.e Park L:nown located at o cs Alts La yynn ~obile °arkn, ^ccor:ocatr- 1r 10 Pase Tjne ^d tvLr. r, 1,'e ron "oox `' :. °rT- •i s~'•pui to ccutim;_n~ rc nt InAreuses, wia cn always soon, to et:cecd thc• cost cf li•: irg indc;:: and ~:nr.ual rat. of inflnt.ion, r+e Lcroby i•utit.ion tc:c. Cay C1' i4ar;cho !'ac arr,onga to enact an or;_inance ~stc:; lishin~_ arc nt control or stabilization boar.: to review cast, yresert a:~.d future rent. increases to deternane if ti:cg are justifiable, bet}: to tl~.e or; r,er and to ti:e tenant, a:;d if r,ot justifiai~~ie to take tLe r.e ~essar~~ stc •~•• to re:::e,i, PlLc •-e~;. ~" ti.e situation, re locl ti_o =' :~: Ovcr,:~r i rct::rn :rem i'.is inrostmont s °''t ~tle"~ to realize a re.~enable be +ern:ec ,r,;~easc:;abla, or~er.ceasi. vee ~~~.^tances wLere t:.at re k. :,ardsi.i'> on ~~ :r ntcs ~nciue fi naynci„light r r-.any of us who are ':;vin;' on~fi;:cd incomes, c au~esor.:e of us to seek Cou r;t y, State or Feciex•al P.i c, of our ix t+-at could omos is ::ot the a~ arrer as ti:e r•~, loca .elocation ins smear. r.able, cost_n~ _^ruc~ tion cost i our :. distance of t. ~ ~?~ Oi~ tO :%U00 ric ,en..ir.~; ,~~ fie anciallg om~+s' c move, etc. ''~ `. ze cf CCe re;,, e .t;Zxlly request ;;our attention to t;. as gracaicable, is m>tter as -~ soon ,_ r t v •/ "' r4 / ..[-:'w /ice/{i.4. A` - / / /c 1/c /~(! 4CCn-t tE•c ~LL~ ~-[~+~~ct.r 0 `. ~ ~~ ~/ / ~. ~ the ~. _~ ~/~ ~-~. 'C<.Z ~. ~~. [' a~. i!.(/!~ .CAL.(. ~ _ // _ •~ .la(a~ 4 ~ / ~/ / y c ~ti ~~ ,~rc~ ` ~ JUG C cV' ~ T M1 ~ / ~f.~Q:1•~~(...~ ~/~ Y..L ~.: '/ ~ ~5 /r CCt..C< .n~--v:.~~. C,.. ~ •t l~(L. /G%/; d~x•LCC,u 1.x.1 JN ~/~ i1 ~ i °~iJG o a~As~¢Lt.~•p rCD /~L7/i L• ^"u C.q R/ 70 TO: CITY CGJI;CIL - CITY OF BALCP.O CL'CAi~:O?dGA, CALIr`CRPiIA 17e, the undarsigne d, are resicie nts of tite Cityy of Rar:cYro Cucrmon(•'s, rosidin~ Sn the l.:obile :iome Park known as Alte Lagu^.a :Sobile Pant located at 1'210 Base Line Rd., wi~.er~ r:e ren snnces o neeer,odatr nur tfo x e ?iom s, nue o continuing rent increases, wk:i ch alvruys acorn to exceed the cost. of li':irg index: ar.d •nrual rat. of inflation, we ?:e r.:by ,~etition ti:e City cf Rar:cho rue amonFa to enact an ordnance estal;lishi r.~ a rent control or stabilization boar.: to review rest, present a~•.d future rent. increases to determine if they are ~ustifi able, both to t?;e owner and to the tenant, and if not justifiable to take t2:e ne:;essary steps to rer~ed; t'.:e situatior„ 1'v"^e; re:s r.e feel fire Farl: Cwnrr is emit lee to realize a re:~cnable return from iris investment, there are instances where ti-,at reU rn might be ±ern:ed ::r.reasonable, or excessive. T1.is .:r~stes ~.ndue fi narci al ?:ardsi:ip on t*.any of us who are livin~~ on fixed !.ncomes, t2:at could ca; ;.esome of us to seek County, State or F'e~ieral Aid, :~.elccation of our homes is riot the ar2wet• as ti'.e r~Lzcation cost is financially insp.:rmour:;,able, cost _n~; from ":;: OCi to ~::000 cope n.S ra; a:'. 1i:e si::e of our homes, distance of tl:e move, etc, L'~ie res~ectivlly request ;;our attention to t::is matter as soon as practicable. C~v~¢~ ~; mot, ~ ~,..' 1 . r1" ~yv ,.p ~' ,..^ i Y ~~ % / % L ~ C/l ~ 4~ T0: CITY COU3CIL - CITT 05' I'A::~ ii0 CUCAb:01CGi,, CALIr CRP:IA P;e, tl:e undersi~,ned, aro resldent;s of the City of Rancho Cuc amo ngn, ros i^1tn0 In ti:u G:obilo I;omo Par4: known ns~~t r c loc ntod ut n n~-~~~in r~~~__~ wLer: c;c r<~n s^ncos o necor~odnt. ^, o~l,:o .t ~b'1• I;om~ u~5 0~o coiil..Lnu inO runt in::re area, which alerays soem to exce ud~the cost of livir.C inde.; and ~;nrual ra! of lnflatinn, we Lc•ro by ;~otit.ion t'.;r City of Rancho 'uc amrn~a to enact. art or,li nanco c;;t u::l?shinr- a runt control or sCab111 zat Ion boar,: to review past, present ar.d future rent ir:cre saes to deterrni ne if ti:ey are justifiable, botY~ to the owner and to the tenant, and if not justifiable to take ti:e necessary steps to rer.;ed, tl:e situation, lY:~e re:.s ';. c- Seal the Farlc ptvn.:r is entit'1e 2. to realize a re:;onable return from iris investment, there are ir:stances tri:ere t!:at rett rn might to !err~:ed ',;m~eascnable, or excessive. Tiers ~_r~: ates ~.mdue fi narcial 1'.zrP~.si.ip on r.;any of us tvY.o are li vin,; on fixed Incomes, tr.at could can:,esome of us to seek County, State or ^ecieral Aid. Eelecation of our homes is ::ot the a~tr;er as the r~~lc:cntlon cost is financially irs .:rr..ouniable, cost ir.G from "2fs00 to ;'5000 depe mind o; ti:e size of our :.omes, distance of t:e move, etc, Pie re cpe;.t!ully request ;;our attention to tk:Is matter as soon as practicable. ~.: ~, ~ ~~, ,~ ~~ ~: ~ ,~ i, ;. - ,. ,~ ~ r~z. ) C/,a-!'t F`n Jet, ~ ~' •, 1 .. T0: CITS CO"";CIL - CITS OF Re1:;;: ii0 CUCAi:C`ZGA, CALL FCRD:IA P;e, tk=e undersiU,ne d, are resider.ts of tk.e City of Rar:cho Cuc::mo rxEa, ros idink; in the L:obile tome Par}; known as .41tr: LaEuna ::obilo Park located ut 10?.10 Base Line Rd~ wLaia arc r:~s^acc:. o ac cc:.odatr our :.:oTi'iTi Co:;: s !`~uu-moo cent in::nU r~:nt in.:re uses, wlSch slwuys seem to exec od~the cost. of li~~~ir.~, in,~e:: and ~..nr.ual rat : of inflation, we i ruby ;'aa ition tk:~• City c ~ i?ancim 'uc n:nonga to enact an ordinar,ee c~,t aklisYc x:~ a rc:~t control or stabilization boar.! to review cast, present. ar.d future rent: increases to deternune if they are justifiable, boti: to t:.e cwner and to t::e tenant, and if not justifiable to tape ti.e ne.:essary stc y^ to rco-ed ti_e situation, lvhe: c~.s '.e feel tl:e Fnrk Own•.r is entit le.i to rc alize a rercnable return from i.is investment, there axe iratancos were ti.at ret; rn miEht be +.er:red ::nxeasorable, or excessive. TiSs ~: r. ales endue fi narci al '-:arciskap on ;eany of ua who are l:vin- on fixed '_ncome s, ti.at could caucesome of us to seek Cow;ty, State or Pedex~al Aid. i:elc cation of our hones is not the arSrer as ti.e relocation cost is financially ins :rc:our. :able, cost in,; frnr„ '.^,: On to `5000 de r:er:~!i^~; on ti.e si ae of our hcmea,~distance of t}.e move, etc. l'ie recpe;t"ally request dour attention to t: is natter es seen as practicable. ,~ - ;- f ~ ' ~' ' ' /' ~c.7./~~2~ ~. . ~ ~ , ' i 7 N 7 ~ /J~~ (/t U/ // ./ / ~ /~R Y~ 'L i / ~ ~ / /~i T. >. ~~~ C/ / ~ ~~ a~ro~• ..rt ~' T0: CITY CO:I^.:CIL - CITS 0' RA::~ki0 CUCAi.:O';Gly CALZr vP,lilA lSe, t!:e uncer•si~ned, are residertts of t2:e Ci t$ of Rar;cho i,uc_rao nGa, rosidir.~ in tk:c L:obile ?:or..e Park known es Alta Luguna tlobile Park located at ~ x - 10^.~0 °'ase Line Rd, w:.er~ e:o r, n„ s^aces na cor,o<iata our i..oFi'_Se I:o:a s, nuu o co; rt.inu!nt-, rent incre use s, wi:ich al.cr:<^s s.;em to eXCeod the cost cf ll~.ir.~ rode:: and ~.nnual rat. of inflation, c:c Lereb•~ ~; et it.ion t':r' City' f:' i?al',el'.O SRC aIDGn(;a to et:act. ur. or,linar.cc cst x:;~li ct,ir.~ a runt control or stabilization boar,: to review rust, present. ar.d future rent inrre aces to de Lerrnine if t:e;,~ are justifiable, both to t`.e ormer and to ti:e ±.enart, and if riot justifiable to take t:-e t,e.:c ssary' stc ~,a to rc:.,eu, t':e sii:uation. °v elc s ro fe,l t!c Furl; Cwn~.~r i^. ent i±le.', to realize a re:one:blo rr,t ~,~rn :'rom i.is irve atma nt, there n.e ? -atancos wi.ere tD,at. re'.i rn m1Ela Le 'ern.eG .:.yens cne6le, or excecs'_ve, T'..is .r~~n CCS ~.ndue finnrcix~.l -:arn slip on zany cf us nho are livin- on fired .ncomes, t:.at could ca~:::esa;e of us to Beek CounCg, Staf e`or Federal Aic. i.elceation of our kxomes is ::ot the a~bv:er as ti:e rrlocct ion r,ost i.s financially ins :r:. .ou;.: able, cost'n,- from '^i rir~ to "b000 ,:e;,en~S::~ a. ~i:e si.~e cf our t.cnes, distance of ~Ck:e move, etc, lGe re s,~e t;,ixlly request ~, our ettcnt ion to tt:is r.~:atter as soon as practicnble. '• ,~ ,~ .~^ ~-~; „~ i _i %n ~ ~ i ~ ~' : r/~ ~ ( / 7 1. ; 7~atit~:~' ~a..L ~z..~~,, c, r ," ~.. ~v~ , ~~ ~ L // ~il~~i. ll. / '~/. `' ~ '~ T0: CITS COL47CIL - C=mv' 0:' i~~A::.. ii0 CUCAL:O?ZGA, C:.LI FCY;2:IA l';e, tt:e undersigned, are resi<iet:{;s of ti:e City of &ar:ckio Cur;:men!•a, resldirg in the i.:obilo I;ome Park krorm as Alta Carona i~tobile Park to catod at to?tn~$ e_T~ine Ad~. w::er+ c.o rc~:nce.s o nccoaodate our ;:.obi e F. onl : s, nuc~o cunt inuin~ rent increases, wlach always soem to exceed tho cost cf li~, irg inee:: and ~.nr.ual ral .' of inflat~cn, we i.eroby ?etition ti:e ray of Aancbo ^uc amonLa to enact an orcinarce est a'~1lshin:: a rout control or stabilization bonr.i to review cast, present ar.d future rent 1r,creases to determine if ti:ey are justifiable, botY: to ti.e owner ano to t're tenant, and i2' r.ot justifiat:ic to take ti.e ne aessar~' stc ns to rcv~!ed, t:.e situation. l'v:^. r,: r~ s : e feel t.i~e =„rk Owr,:~r i:, entitle r. to realize a re.~enable rctl :•n 2'rom .:is ir,vestmont, tk:e re arc in^t nncos wi:e re t!at re*.: rx; :eight Le +eru:ed ':n.~ea::onr.blc, or excessive. 'i::..:: r arcs ~n:iue fi nanciol i.arcisi.i p on n:ar,y of us w::o arc- l~vin ~, or, fizcd .. rcones, ti.at could nacresome of us to seek County, Statc~or i'c4eral Aid. ::al~cat ion of our itone:s is ::ot tl:e cr ~$v:or as t!.e r~ l~cat.,ion eest is financially ins'.rr..our.:.able, cost ink rrc:n 1..,. ;i~a tc .':.000 Le pe r.,.i^~; c::: t::e sise of our icmes, distance of tY.e move, etc. l'!e re cpe~.t:'ully request ,'our attert ion to t?as r.+utter es soon as practicable, L. , ~ ~ I -/ ~ ~ G ~. ~'1~ J I/'' ~// ~ e^J~N /n{ ~ //,' C) ~/ U ~JGyA-2e[.+~' ~ 7. y/~ ~ ~ ' -`L 1 // Ul 2~~ ~r . ,r.rt~J lc'zio,,r ~ ~ ~C~`~ h,c C~~~~ i~ v ~Za~~cew ~: GL•~L'~r /C.~:c ~Q.u~-...o~ L~c'L'f2. /zr~ C~cL? 9/7~'/ t ~ /r"f ~ /'~L ..Xr'_ ,C /~./r e: <<r.. /~H/YS 1.1 Ef~"l',C -F,t! ~~t: ~~...C/ 1 ~ C? ^ v, / c ~~ r 6 J /~ % 1 ~ '.40 ~/ G't % /~~~ n ~ ~,~ "~ ~ ii6 C~' / ~ ~ e/ i rtl ter,„ +~1, ,/7 / , /. J ~r a. .. a ~J.' LC" : r( / G 'n rd ./,'.'/l([-[in'r, '~iSL ./C ,.+ ~2~.' .4 C j<C/ L ~~'7 i • ~ Ci ~^/,~ / ~ ` ~ ' C~ " ~~ sue. ~ ~:' - e C C ~ esc~ T0: Crmy COI9CIL - CITY OP IiA::: fi0 Cti CAL:OiJGA, CAL"iFORLiIA 'Se, the undersigned, nre res icke nts of tf:e City of F.ar:eLo Cuc:nonf;a, ros'ding in t'.:e ?;obile ?ior.e Park Y.norm as~lta Le~+un.~: Nobi a Park locatod at se r.i he Rd., w}:cr< vrc rrn spnces o aceer.odatc. our 11o i e !:or.i s, Due to continu i::~ rant inere ases, wl:!ch alcr;:ys seen to exceed the cost of liroir.~ index: ar.d ~~nrual rat of inflation, we l.crrby petition tiro rity o_` rancho 'uc amon~a to enact a.^. or;:i nonce cst:.: lishir.~ a rent control or stabill zat ion boar.: to review past, present and future rent increases to determine if t e~ are justifiable, both to tk:e owner and to t'rs t.enart, and if rot justifiable to take tee ;:ecc.ssary ste_>:; to reined; tLe situation, Cf^erc:s ~.:e feel ti~.c Fark Owner -_c e:ait lc r. to rcali2e a re:.onable r•r.t~.~rn from ias im'catr.,ent, tk:cre are irstances w}:ere t1~.at ret~ rn :n1E,ht Lc +orc:ed un:~ea.=,orable, or esce sci ve, T~.is ,~r~ ales ~.ncuc fS nar:ci,l k.ercisi.ip on ::,any of us wk:o ere livin~~ on fixes incomes, ti.at could cau::esome of us to seek County, State or Federal P.id. i~.elccation of our homes is not. the arSrre,~ as to relocation cost is financially it;s :rr.oun*.able, cost ink _*ron; f;. Op to ('5000 de?:er.diri. oa +i.e size cf our i_ocne s, distance of tY.e move, etc. G:'e rec~.e ~a _"ally request ;our attenticn to tkas msttei• es seen as practicable, L / S L ' ~ /~ ~ ~ .~~ ' ,. .. o k, ~ i~ 1 : f coy (/ ~ (.. ~ / ~~, ~.~ .. r / C / l .L ~ } ' ~~ ~C., i cn t ~.!( ! (~ ~ ~ r i t.,` i ~. T0: CTTi' COD:QCIL - CiT: OF' P,A::!0 ;,ti CAA:Oi;GA, CALIn ORP+IA C;e, tk.e undersigned, are residerrta of tk:e City of Ranek,o i. uc,mo nk,a, roc.ding in tk:e L:obile !!or.:e Park known as 4r ' loc¢tcd at / 0 3S~ 3ASft in. F +~ D wi.c i•,. ,:~a r^n snaoes o acco:.odatr our l.:o i e f[om s. _ue o coot i.nuing rent increases, which alcr::ys soam to exceed the cost of li sing index: and : nr.url rat.. of inflat.icn, we k.o:•eby ;~etiti on ti:e Cty of i~. at:ci:o !'uc atnonk;a to enact an ordinerce cct ~'lishing a rc-nt control or stabi llzation boar:i to review past, present acd future rc nt. increases to determine if t'.:ey are justifiable, both to tke ovrner ar:c to the *.enact, and if r.ot justifiable to take tk:e ne:•,cssar" steps to rc:::ed; td,e situatlon. 1T.^.a~~e: s c feel ti.e : arL Orrn ~r is crtit le.E to realize a re::onable ret~~.rr. from 'r.is im~estc~rnt, there are instances wi:ere t1.aC reU rn eight be termed ~,. r.:~e asone.ble, or excess-. ve, Ti:is ~:r~. etas ::ndue financial narC:si_ip on ,;any oP cs who are 1_vir,r on fi,°,eci '_ncomes, t'r.at could causesome of us to seek County-, State Vor Federal Aid. Relocation of our horses is ::ot the arxcaer as ti.e r::~locat ion cost is financially ins:rn:ouni: able, costing froT ".^,i OG to "'5000 deper.:a ng o:: cite size c£ our homes, distance of the move, etc. l:'e re spe:.t iltlly request dour attention to tkas m.,tter es soon as practicable, '~' ., ,.~ . :..~i' ' ~' ~_ f #~ ti:' a/ Ki/ ~ `~~") zo r~ , ~, ;ya, . : ' ~.~ i , . ~ t • : , ' r~ %b7 f ,~ !~/. T0: Cli- CC~':CIL - CS?"i 0: :~~d:' ?:0 ~ti CA5:01:CG, ~~:.I,? Cfi?:In l".e, tLe undersigned, are reside nts of ti:r. City oT Fnr:cLO Cur:mo nUn, resldinQ ir. t}:e t:obile I:oc:e Par$ Ll:own na ~ ___-- ~ ~ _` •-' <~ 10 L'atLd at / _ -_ Wt.O P~ 'B I'e'r1~ S':aC u'^. CEO - aceu.odate our ;;:o _ o ?: o.^.i n~. Dui ~.o cont inc:r.0 renC i:~.:re;:ae;, Wiacb cl:r:. ~;s s:;em to exraod tixc cost cf li~.ir.;- in:in:: s::d nr.ual ra' ci' inflat ion, C:G i. ,•oby ; ntit ion t:.c ^it,; c. l' i?acci.o "uc amon(;a to enact an or•iin;mee est::Llishir.- a runt control or stabilization bonr.: to review nest, present a:~.d future rer.t~ ir,cre aces to ca ternune if t cy are 'ustifi able, botk: to t!.e or;ner and to ti:c ?.er.ent, and if r.ot jastifi axle to rake t:.e :re.:essary stc,~s to rc::.ed, t!.e situation. ':i::c: e. s ~ foal ti.e Fnr:~ Or; r,~ r !;: ent itle ~' to ,enlize a re, oaable rrturn from Lis irr,~:: r,tr^•eni., tLere arc ";. r.t nr,ccs w!.are t.! st re'.~ rn ini rYa bu •eru'.er: ..• cuc.::;r i,lc, or .. ~: e:,:,`ve. nu;:u 1'l nand n.l ...._,.,.-_-> ., c. r:'..or;.r•e li t_ on+fi;:cd ::colr,e s, t:.at cou1C ::esor.'.e oi' us„to seek Co'4;a y, .. ice ar :'e coal Aid, : el.:cation cf •our k:cnes is eot. the a~xcrc:' as ~t:-:e z• l.:cat. •: on cost is financially _..s .r::.oUn:.able, costcn;; ;'ro;:, '.,. ,,;, tc EGGO .:epcmS::~; er. i!.e si::e cf cur i.onns, distance of tiro move, ^etc, ~;:e re c;:e'.t±Ully requr;st ;;our attelaion to ti. _.s r.: fitter as seen es practicatle, 7 - ~ :2. - nc. v : ~. ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ .Q .>' ~' '~ T ~ r'i T~ /~ c~ r ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~.. _.... ii/ ,_ - l r .%v' 6 bet _'i :fir. _ C,/ •`~~._ 1 ~~ 6 ~ < - ~ ~. ivG ~~ t r~ d, -~- r ~ ~~ ~', ; ~ ~ ----- ~~,.~ ~ ~~,~~ ~ -, 7. I ~,,: . : ~ .wr. ` / ~'rr~ ~~ ~/V/ Zf ' :.:j-Gac,a~ ~~ lr ~i c~ (~~ ~r~( j Cl ~' ~I f-( ~ ~ ~. lG ~~ (" C ;r, / , / ~ ~7 ~ ~ ',/~ `I ~~ ,,,, ,. ~ 4 ,L 't: ~~- i i 7~ ~ yq ~" ~~ ~• l~ s /~ U / I'( IY1NJ a :/ a T0: C_TTY COL`SCIL - C??Y p? :;A:;'~:i0 CL'CAi:Oi;GA, CF.I,i.^CFP:IA Cfo, ti.e undersigned, are roside nla of tiro City' of Fa::cbo Cu °monga ro s'_dirg in t`e ~t.:obi,J.e ~,~,q,i ;e Fa Y. b:n e;n s f1/t~Vsta M6~/S /~(rr Ce,.r~ located nt/O3SdL~.+s-(.:~ Ur1! ,Ilia ~erq ~ . wi.<: r•: r: c: r:• a^nces ~£o ncco:•.odat~: cur L:o ,x e i:om s. Due 'o coot inn!ni; ro nt in.:re uses, wi:ich alr;ays soem to exr.e~d the cost of li'.in~ index: and neual rata of inflat Son, ae :~.er~•by ;cti t3 on t:.o ^i4y c. `~ i?a~:ei.o ~ucamcnCa to enact an orGinance c,,;; lichit:~ a root control or sCabilization boar.. to reviev+ oast, present, ar:d future rrnt• increases to deternvne if the;; are ,iustifi able, bot}, to tic ownor ur:S to ti.J +ennnt, and if not justifi aL'_e to taY.e t:.o ;..; ,:e ss ary st c;,:; tc re:.:e d, t_e yiCUatior., F1i:e: ens Yo~„1 tl.r, Far.: ^v, r, r ir. entf tl:-~' to rc Mize uuiole :•. rrn froc~ i~.is investment., t::ere are iatarcos rvi;ere t:~,at re i:. rn m10r1-.t be~~cr::,er, ,. r.:~easonabla, or ex~;essivc. ^Li~ .-r~. n:•.,s endue fi nar:ci al ~~ard :r.+_p cr. r.'.a^.y c^ us r~i:o are !!vi:.~ on fL:ed !:,comes, tk.at could ca~.;:.~ecome of us to seek Coun',:y, Stato or Fariox•al P.id. ielncation of cur ho:acs is~::ot the arxt;e:' as t:.c r•~l.cat ton cos: is financially ins s::.our.::able, costing froc -.^.: Ci0 tc 'a000 de;:e nG i:{', v. '.:.e s!c;e of our :~:ome s, dirt ar:ce of tk.e move, etc, Cie recpe ~;t ruby request ;,our attention to tk.is otter as soon as practicable, l / / ~ ! ~ ~ // l -:. nJ/-d .. ~ ,: ~ ' C .2. Y.:', ~ 'J i/ .. ,. J ' ~, ~_~/. - ~~ c//I ~~`~~ Y of \~~'. ~ `~:: ~ ~\~ ~~ ~ ~~; ,1t5i ~Jf1 _ ' r~~t ~.l ~ X ~~~ I 'i { 7/ ~~ 1 ~ / 1~1.~U Y f~. ~~,l y' 1 ,,(( y ,: ~ I / ,' , ~ ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ ' - ~~/ a~,~/ ~zr.~a~ , ~ ~ r., .i ~G. J r: '1 . ~ t Lt t,' ~ ; ~ ~ ~ .~ /iI o ~ /iii ~ J 1~ ' i0: CITY COUNCIL -CITY OP RANCRO CUGMONGA, GLIFORNIA /~ ~~.J_ , We, the underef gned, ere reafdente of [he City of Rancho Cucamongs,-~ ~! reef ding in the Mobile Home Park known as Chaparral Nelghts, located at 6880 Archibled Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, where we re~ea to atcomodete our Mobile Homes. Due to Continuing rent increases, which always seem to exceed the Lost of living Sndex and annual rate of inflation, we hereby petltfon the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga to enact en ordinance estebli shing a rent control or atebi lizetion board Co review poet, pre cent and Euture rent fncreases to determire !E they ere Jue Gifiabl~, both to the owner end to the tenant, and if not Jue[l fieble [o [eke the neceeeery e[eps to remedy the sltua[fon. Whereas ve feel the Park Owner 1e anti[ led to realize a reaeoneble return from hie investment, [here are lnatancea where the[ return might be termed unreasonable, or excessive. Thfa creates undue financial herdehip on many of us who are living on fixed incomes, that could possibly Cause some of ue to seek County, Stale or Pederel ASd. Relocation of our homes fe not the enewtr as the relocation coat 1• financially insurmountable, costing from $ 2,500 to $5,000 depending on sire of home, distance to move etc. We reapec[fully request your atten[Son to thfe matter ee coon ae practicable. ~~ r.:,-xe.,~ ~', L~C'~~ .. ~ 7~ i4 5 _/~_ :, 7y ~ //}//}-- / T /~i .. fi ~ - r~ - I - /= _~ t!i r ~' ?t r- j. ~ , \~~t~.- ~i~1 CL.'LF_. .7 ~" _~ v. ~jrt z ~~ F ~ ~t <~ ~ /'.. j' /? yc/ • _ .. 'TO: CITY CgJNCIL -CITY OP RANCHO'CUCANONGA, CALIFORNL4 We, the under elgned, are residents of the City of Rancho Cucaaangs, residing Sn [he llobf le Hose Park kaovn a• Chaparral Hel ghts, located a[ 6880 Azchlblsd Avenue, Rancho Cueaswnge, where we rent spaces [o aecomodate our Mobile Hoes. Due to continuing rent increase s, whf ch always seen to exceed the coat of living Sndex end nnnuel rate of inflation, we hereby pet ltlon the CS[y of Rancho Cucamonga to enact an ordinance estebll shfng a rent control or e[abilize[fon board [o review pee[, pre sent and future rent increases to dntezmine 1f they are ]ustifiebls, both to Che owner end [o the tenant, end if not ]uatifiable to take the necessary steps to remedy [he situation. Whereas we feel [he perk Owner ie anti [led to realize a reasonable return from hi• investment, there 8re ins[ancee where that return might 6e termed unreasonable, or exce salve. This creates undue financial hardship on many of u• who are living on heed incomes, that could po esfb ly ceuee some of us to seek County, State or Federal Aid. Reloca [Son of our homes ie not [hn answer ea the retocatlon cost i• financially inaurmounte6le, coating Erom $ 2,500 to $5,000 depending on size of home, distance to move etc. We re spec tfully~iequeat your~~a tten[ion to this matter ea Boon ee practicable. ~~. , / Name ~~~ ~ i/"(/~ ),- r' Space 4 ~- ~1 ~~ ~ ,~ Y /6 .._~/emu li.... -.~t ___r- , , :~_. _ ;~ ~ ~. ~; ,tea ~~ ,~.~i~ .~~~ is1_ -r (~ /5', /f',~' ~ )'~~qY~L ii~s 1 ., c~~o: , a ,.., i n ' 20: CTIY COUNCIL - CITY OP RANCHO 1cuGxONG, GLIPORNLA He, the underelgned, are residents of [he City of Rancho Cucamonga, re sl ding in the Nobilc Home park know a• Chaparral Heights, loceled et 6880 Archlblad Avenue, ReneM Cucamonga, xhete we rent spaces to aecomodete our Mobile Nomes. Due [o continuing rent lncreeee •, xhic6 elweye seem to exceed the <oa[ of living lode: and annual rate of infl et ion, xe fiereby petition the City of Ranch Cucamonga to enecC an ordinance eate611shfng • rent control or etebillzat ion board to review peat, present end future rent Increases to determine if they sre ~ue[lfiablf, both ro the over end to the tenant, and Sf not ~ueti Eleble to cake the necessary etepa to remedy the altuat ion, Hherees we Eeel the Park Owner Se eneltled to realize a reasonable return from his Enve stment, there are ine[ancen where that return might De termed unreasonable, or excessive. This creates undue financial hardship on many of ua who are living on Heed incomes, that could possibly cause come of ue to seek County, Stetn or Federal Aid. Relocation of our homes Se not the enaver es the relocation coat !a Financial ly lnaurmoun[eble, coating from $ 2,500 to $5,000 depending on ci ze of home, distance to move etC. Ne respectfully reque~st/ylo~urda_tt_e/noon to this matter ea soon as practicable. Name, ~",q ;`. ~Q/~j~~,$pace 0 ~7 ' T0: CITY CWHCSL - CITY OP RANC80 'CUCAM~NCA, GLIPORNIA l Ne, the undersigned, are realden[• of the CSty of Rancho Cu<amonga, ze aiding 1n the }foblle Nome Park known ea Chaparral Hef ghta, located at 6880 Archlbled Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, where ve rent epecea to eccomodate our Mobile Homes. Due [o continuing rent lncreeaea, rhich elway^ seem to exceed the coat of living index and annual rate of inflation, ve hereby petition the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enact an ordinance establlahing a rent control or stabilization board to review past, present and future rent fncrenae• [o determine if they are ]ustifiabl~, both to the owner end to the tenant, and if no[ ]uetifieble to take the nettssery steps [o remedy the sl tact ion. Hhereae ve feel the Park Owner ie entitled to realise a tee sonable return from his invectmenq there are inetancee where that return might be termed antes soneble, or exec salve. This creates undue flnanc Sal hardship on many of ua who are living on faced incomes, chat could possibly cause some of ue to Beek County, g[e[e or Pederel Afd. Relocation of our homes !e not the answer es the relocation coat is financially insurmountable, coating from $ 2,500 Co 55,000 depending on clze of home, distance to move et<. We re apectfu lly request your attention to this matter as eoon ea praetieeble. ~ / O ~~0 ~~ 7 J TO: CITY COUNCIL - CITY OP RANCHO CUGHdNCA, GLIFORNIA We, the underefgned, are residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, residing 1n the Mobile Aone Perk known as Chaparral Height ^, located at 6880 ArchiDlad Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, where we rent apace• to a<comodete our Mobile Homes. Due to continuing rent Increase •, which always seem to exceed the cost of living index and annual rate of inflation, we hereby petition the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enact en ordinance eatabliahing • rent control or st e611f ration board to review pee[, present and Euture rent Sncreaae• to determine if [hey are ~ustiffeb l~, both to the owner and to the tenant, and Sf not ~u etlfisble to take the necessary steps to remedy the ai rue tlon. Whereas we feel the Park Owner fs entitled [o realize a rea eonab le return from h1• Investment, there are instances where that return might be earned unreasonable, or excessive. This creates undue financial hardship on many of ue who are living on flced Incomes, that could possibly cause some of ue to seek County, grate or Federal Afd. Relocation of our homes Se no[ [he enever es the relocation cost is financially inaurmoantable, coating from $ 2,500 to $5,000 depending on size of home, distance to move etc. We respectfully request your attention to this matter as soon ea prae[S<able. ~~~Y Ib: CITY COUNCIL - CIYY OP RANCHO CDCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA {le, the undersigned, are reaident• of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, residing in the Mobite Home park known s• Chaparral Rei ght •, located st 6880 Are4lblad Avenue, Rnneho Cucamonga, where we rent apace• to sccovgdete our Mobile Nomes. Due to continuing rent Sncrease •, vhf ch always seem to exceed the cost of living index and annual rate of Inflation, we fiereby petition the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enact an ordinance establl shfng a rent control or etebili ration board to review peat, present and future rent increases to determine !E they ere ~ustlflablt, both to the owner end to the tenant, and if not Juatifleble Co fake the nets eaery steps to remedy the ei tuetfan. Nheteae xe feel the Perk Owner Se entitled to realize t reaeonaDle return from hi• Snve a[ment, there are instances where Cha[ return might be termed unresaonable, oz exce sefve. This creates undue financial hardship on many of u• who are living on fixed incomes, chat could possibly cause some of ua to seek County, State or Pederel Aid. Relocation of our fiomea ie not the answer as the relocation coat is Financially insurmountable, coating from $ 2,500 to $5,000 depending on size of home, distance to move etc. Ne respectfully request your attention to [his matter ae soon ee practicable. ~,~ _t U,r'' ' T} /yC `, , TO: CITY COUNCIL - CITY OP RANCHO CUCANONCA, GLIFORNIA We, the underefgned, are resident of Che C1[y of Rancho Cucamonga, reeiding in [he Hobile Rose Park known a• Chaparral Helghta, located at 6880 Arehlblad Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, where ve rent spaces to eccomodate our Noblle Hosea. Due to continuing rent increase •, which alvags seem to exceed the coat of living index and annual rate of fnEletfon, ue hereby petition the City of Rancho Cucamonga [o enact en ordinance esteblf ahing • rent control or stab111ze[ion board [o review past, pro en[ and future rent increases to determine iF they are lustfflabls, both to the owner and to the tenant, end Sf not ~u et lfiable eo take the necessary steps to remedy Che e![uetlon. Nhereaa xe feel [he Park Ormer Ss entitled to reali:e n reeaoneble return from hL Snveatment, there are instances where the[ return might be termed unreasonable, or exce salve. Thfa creates undue financial hardship on many of ue who are living on flied incomes, that could pa ss161y cause some of us to seek County, State or Pederal Afd. Relocation of our homes !e not the answer ea [he relocation coat is financially fnsurmounteble, co sting from $ 2,500 [o $5,000 depending on size of home, distance to move etc. Ne reapec [fully request your attention to [hfa matter ea soon ae prattlcable. Name Soace 0 .; , , , T0: CITY COUNCIL - CITY OP MNC80 CUGNONG, GLIPORNLI We, Che undersigned, are reeldenu of the CSty of Aancho Cucamonga, residing Sn Che Mobile Howe Park knom es Chaparrsl Hef ghta, located et 6880 AreAiblad Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, where we rent epace^ to eecomodete our Hob11e Hosea. Due to continuing rent inctee sea, which always seen to exceed the coat of living index and annual rate of inflation. we hereby petition the C![y of Rancho Cucamonga [o coat[ an ordinance establishing • rent control or stabilize[ ion board to review pest, present and future rent lncrease^ Co determine 1E they ere jua[1f1ab1~, both to the timer end to the tenant, and if not justlfiab le Co take the necessary steps to remedy the eltuatlon, Nhereae m feel the Park Omer Ss entitled to realice a reasonable return From hi• investment, there are Snstancee where that return might be termed unreasonable, or excessive. This tree tee undue financial hardship on many of us who are living on flced incomes, that could possibly cause some of ue to seek Countl, State or Pederal Aid. Relocation of our homes 1s oot [he an ewer as Che reloce [ion cost i• flnancfel ly ineurmounteble, coating frow $ 2,500 to $5,000 depending on cize of home, distance to move etc. we respectfully request your et[ention to thi• matter ae soon ea prat[ ica6le. M 11 ~ f ,~y) Name ~11P YI IRY k. ~ .':~\Q , Space # ~Y~ ~, ',~. c ,/~ ~ ~. _~ } ~~8 _~~ „~, . ,, _.~ G-~ TO: CITY COUNCIL - CIYY OP RARC90~CUGMUNGA, GLIPORNIA Ke, the underelgned, are residenb of the City of Rancfio Cucamonga, reelding !n the tbbile Home Park koorn as Cfieperrel Heights, located at 6880 Arehiblad Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, rhere we rent apsce• to seeomodatn our Mobile Romes. Due to continuing rent Sncree sea, vhieb always seem to exceed the coat of living index and snnual rate of inflation, ve fiereby petition the City of Rancho Cucaaonge [o enact en ordinance establishing s rent control or stab111zat1on bosrd to revier pest, present end future rent lncreese• to determine if they are Ju •[ifLbiY, both to the over end to the tenant, and 1f no[ JuetiFlable to take the neeeseary etep• to remedy the of tuetfon. Kheree• ve feel the Perk Owner Ss entitled to realise a reeeonable return from his investment, there are inetancee where that return might be termed unreeaonable, or excessive. This creates undue Efnenefal hardship on many of us who are living on ffeed incomes, that could poaeiDly cause some of us to seek County, State or Pederal Aid. Relocation of our homes Ss not the en ewer as [he relocation coat 1• financially inaur~ountable, co eting from $ 2,500 to $5,000 depending on sire of home, distance to move etc. Ke respectfully request your attention to this matter a• soon ea practicable. F~~--~ ~M.U~ / CS'U n • ~ TO: CIIY COOBCIL - CITY OP RAHC80 CUGMONG, GLIFORHLA Ne, [he underei goad, ere residents of the City of Rentho Cucamonga, residing in the lbbile Home Park known se Chaparral Heights, loeeted at 6880 Archlblad Avenue, Rentho Cucamonga, where we ran[ apece• to eccomodate our Mobile Homes. Due !o continuing rent inereese •, whfe6 always seem to exceed the coat of living indez and annual rate of inflation, we hereby petition the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enact an ordinance establishing • rent control or stabilization board to review past, present end future rent Sncreesea to determine if they ere ]uetfflebly, both to the owner end to the tenant, and if not ]uetlfia6le to take the mace seery steps [o remedy the situation. Hhereaa we feel [he Pazk Owner 1• entitled [o realize a teaeonable return from hi• love atment, [here are lnetantee where that return might be termed unreasonable, or exceaelve. This creates undue financial hardship on many of ua who are living on faced incomes, that could poae163y cause some of ua to seek County, Stele or Federal Aid. Relocation of our homes is oot the answer ea [he relocation cost 1^ flnancfelly ineuzmounteble, co sting from $ 2,500 to $5,000 depending on size of home, distance to move ate. He re apectfully request your etten[ion to this matter e• Boon ae practicable. 1 .. ~- • ,,~,~ ' ~ TO: CITY COUNCIL - CITY OP RANCHO CUGNONG, GLIPORNLA Ne, [he under elgned, are reeldente of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, reef ding in the Hobi le Home Park known an Chaparral Ref ghts, located et 6X80 Arehibled Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, where ve rent spaces Co accomodete our Noblle Homers. Due to continuing rent increase a, whlcb always seem to exceed the coat of living index and annual rote of inflation, we hereby pelf tion the Ci[y of Rancho Cucamonga [o enact an ordinance esteblLhing a rent control or stabilization board [o review pee[, present end future rent Sncrensea to determine if [hey ere fuetifiabls, both to [he owner end to the tenant, end 1f not ~uetlfieble [o take the nece eaery atepe to remedy the e![uatlon. Nhereae ve feel the Park Owner Se entitled to rea if ee a reasonable return from hie inveatmen[, there are instances where that return might be teraed unreasonable, or exceaelve. This creates undue financial hatdehip on many of ua who are living on Fixed incomes, that could possibly cause some of ue to seek County, Stele or Pederal Aid. Relocation of our homes is no[ the anever as [he relocation coat 1s Financially inaunsountab]e, costing from $ 2,500 to $5,000 depending on size of home, distance to move ate. Ne respectfully request your attention co chis matter ae soon es practicable. '"?/L Z i _ ~~ , _.. T0: C1mS OOU:;CIL - CITS OF Adi:~ ii0 CUCAL:OL:G6, CALIFCxS:IA 0• ~ r 'Ce, tLe under sipne d, are resick nts of tLe city of R¢nebo i:ur.mo nga, ro s.ding in t'.:c ;,;obile.home ?:ark krown as .v, /-, ,•7 h...F. ~~, .,. .~ .. PG ~_ ' locatod ¢ti !« ~ ~„',~~^, r_o Lv'r, r, s'c ron s?aces o ~-~~ ~• acec::edato our :,.o .2 e i:om s. Duo to corr~.inuinL rent incre uses, i • ' I wi•._ch alv;::ys s,:on to exceod the cost of li•d r.~, in e:: and '.nrual rst of inflation, r+c :.o ru by ,•.aitiun t::r, ^ity' cI' :?anct;o ~"uc a:rcnt;a to onset. an or~i nar,ce Est a!1lshir.~ a rent control or stabilization boar:i to review past, present acd future rent increases to daternxine if t ay are iustifl able, botY: to ti.e oemer arai to tee tenant, and if not fustifiai~le to take tee :.o_essary ;tn,s to ra~,~ed, ti,e situation, l'i:^.e re:.s °~ ferl the F;.rk Ov+r:~~r i~• or~±it lc:: to rc ali.ze a rErenablo rctrrn from as investr..e.nt, there are iatances w'i.are t;.st re "~. rn :night be 'eru:ed ~s•casonablc, or e;: Tess ive. ... ,:r.aha ~~ndue fi nanci.a :~.arrls:.ip on ;:.nny of ;~s wlio arc. I'vin- on fi;:c ~ 'acome&, t1.at could cac'.~esor.:u of us to seek Cocnty, State or bederal Aid. :elccation of our horua is ::ot the a: xr;er as t!.e r- location cost is financially ins .rmoun: able, cont'.n; from ".,r ;In tc ',':800 ~.:c:i,cr:,:ir;~_ o', tl.e ai::e ~f our t.om,a, cii stance of tl.e move, otc, P:'e re s,eetllzlly request dour attc-rtion to t'r:is r::;tter es scon as ?racti cable, , ~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ T3 ~ ~ ~~i + ~~e, cd~r(, ~~' ~ `;~ l .. a ~,: ~ ~ z, .. u. ~ . . r % ;ca - ,~~ ~ . ?~ ~ '~ ~ <-fzr: ~~~ 7~ _«~~ •.~.; ~ jai-:~„z,~-,~-" -~°--. 1 ~5~~ ' ,`~ ~5 ~ LJ / ~ ~S5 /, •t yJ. , ;,_ ^I V ~ ~ , // r, ~ ~ .;,~ ~- ~ < < s / cyp~ ~ ~. f lr ~ p y / ? ~ ~ _ W ~ c >~ / 'L ) •y' ~- ~ ~ ~' /JI ~' w ~f , {' i ~ T0: CITI' COU:vCIL - CITY OF RA:d: ;:0 CUCAi„O?.GA, CALIFCRP?IA Pie, the undersigned, are residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, rosiding in the }dobil~ me ark known as r,r',~ ~+~_{, ', /~ y~~_ locnted nt~ wLero v:e r`•~; s:;nce.s accor,odat.c o~}:om s. Due continuing rent increases, wlach always seem to exceed the cost of livir.~ index: and annual rat., of inflation, we i,ereby ;etit,ion ti:e City of Rancho Cucamonga to enact an ordnance cstaLllshin~ a rent control or stabilization boar.: to review past, present and future rent increases to determine if trey are ,justifiable, both to the owner and to the tenant, and if not ,justifiable to take ti:e ne::essary steps to reined; tie situation. LY'.?e; re:;s r.e feel t;;o Fark Ownor is en±itleri to realize a re:~onable return from ras investment, there are instances wi:ere tt:at ret:.rn might be ±ern:ed ~.:ns~easonable, or excessive, T:.is cr~~stes ~~.ndue financial i:ardstap nn r.-;any of us who are livin- on fixed !.ncome s, ti'_at could eau::esorte of us to seek County, State or I'e:icral Aid. i;alccat.ion of our homos is not the a:~xe+e:' as tY:e relocation cost is financially ins~.rr:ountable, cost in,_ from '3: OCi to i`5000 cie pe nCir.~, or. t::e size of cur homes, distance of tf:c move, etc, lie respe:a ltzlly request dour attention to t7as c~:utter as scon as practicable, c {{i ).~ GCC 1C:ZK1. f ,, • ~[ ~ ' i /. ~i ~ ~:7?iLCEt . ' ~ f S~ '. •. To: CITT COY!ICZL - Ci'1'S 0`e' Rd::. i:0 C'UCAi.;O_;GA, OAI•IF~.: kS:IA P:e, ti:e undorsi~;ned, are residents of ti.c Citg of Rar.eLO Cuc~:mo nt;a, res:.dirg in tk:c !,:obile !;or.,e Par}: I;down as~'~1~Nrs Mc,7 k (r~a6 located at qyq-% ~ / -rw.A.<G~/,e~~Wk.: r. nc rim s;m c•ca o ao c:,:,odat,: our ,.: o~x cal;om ^ =u~o coot i:n,'~.nt; r::n1, in~ra ases, witch ahr:ys seem to exreed~tk:e coat of lisir.~, index: ar.d -. nr.unl rat of inflnt i.on, no Lo ruby !"; t, it.ion ti:r• ';ity ,~1' hnr.cl:o Luc s:ncn/;e to enact n:: ~r<:irr,:r:co pct ,,: llsLl.n~ a runt control or staui llzat.ion boar.! to review vast, present a-.d future rent. incre eses to determine if trey arc htstifi able, both to ti.e owner and to ti:e ±,enant, and if not. just~ifiat.le tc tuAe the neaessar; stc;;a to re:~.:ed, tLe situation, LV::e re~ s r.e feel t.V.c Fart: ('rm~r i:. entitled to realize a re.onable roturn !'rom l;is inveatme.nt, there nre iratances w:.ere tl.at return might be !ern:ed ,. r:_~easonablo, or excessive. ,.. .:r ~atcs ~.ndue fi narcial :ar%sk-ip on n;any of us who are Lein" on fixed !.ncome s, ti:at could ca::~eac::e of us to seek County-, Stave or Pe<ieral Aid, 'r,alccation of our hones is x:ot the a~-xwer as t::e relocation cost is financially i:a .r:::oun~able, coat in,- !bin;, ":i; Or, to `:.+000 ,:e i,er.~.i nt; o~, +:.e si::o cf our k:om,a, distance oi' t}:o move, etc. i':e recpe aiully request dour atter!t ion to tk.is matter es scon as gracti cable, /~ ~ ~ '0~ n a' f~ a.iLl,.r. ~ 16 / /~L rC ay / ~ J ~ ~~F1 ~ ~r ~ ~"/~ 3 ~ . /. ,. r A''M J_r J // tl f ~ ~ / r. _ ~ /r~ / _ <' -f' Lc. , A.e~Ar yJ' ~`../~ -C /I~ / CZ L 4G ~ ~ r ^ r~. ~ C t Y ., ~ C `-P 3 (.. l'k' E .~ / - I-uW ~ a ~./-.-~.~__//!~/x i,(,e C, ~-G"L[h.,.Z. PLC y~,, ~ ,a sy . ~5 ,~ ~~ c r _ C. S ~` , >f ,f %t" cl ~.~.ZCz U ' ~. -f-~` c~,, ,.,~~;1x4 ,ti::j, i ~~. tik ~ of ~'s"~ ~ ~ -, : ay- ~- -- /> Q ~ ~ , .- 2.n-ram- C ~J Gl'Z aln r1"'. 7 // , u'~ ~ 73 ~ ;,/ y .~• - T0: CITS COU:;CIL - CITY OF RA::~}i0 CUCAi~:O?;GA, OALIFORDiIA }';e, tie unrorsigned, are residents of tic City of jar:cho Cuc..mo nga, rosi.dinG in the :'obile home °ark };nown as ~ -C ~_v.-_~ .r ~.r,r 'r CC. to catod ut %'i `i i f f'l.- 1 ~r ~/ wi.e:~r ere runt maces o nc conodatc our ;, o$i e i; orT ,i s, nue 'EO ~ont.im:inr rc nt inrre asea, W2•.i c$ altrays s~•em to eaceod the cost. of 1i~:ir.Z index: and :.nrual rat of infiat.ion, we 2:eroby ret ition the City cf itaucho Cucamonga to enact an orcinanea eat a'aishir.r a rent control or stabilization boar.'. to review east, present ar.d i'uture rc•ni, i.nere ases to determine if t::ey are juatiSiable, botk: to tY:e ownor and to the tenant, end i£ r.ot justifia'.'Ae to ta4:e t::e ::c::essary stc;m to re::,ed;, ti.e situation, Fr e~~e~ s ~c i; feel tl~.e Far}< Oem,:r is entitle.! to realize a rc:~onable re.t•..rn S'rom iris investment, there are instances wi:ere that re t: rn migY,t be ?err:ed ',.m~easonable, or excessive. Tice rr-.atcs ~,ndue fi nar.cin.l i:ar;;si.ip on ;::any c£ us who arc livin' on fiacd :.ncomes, t:at could ca::cesor:e o£ us to seek Cocnty, Stat e~•or Federal Aid. i.elccation of our honor is ::ot the srxe~or as ti.e rclocat ion cost is financially ins .rr.:oun r,able, coati neC from "S:.CO to ,'0000 depe r,::ir.C on r:.e size of our tomes, distance o£ tie move, etc. }'Ce respe:.ti'ully request ;our attert ion to ti:is r.•:atter as soon as practicable. ~. r ~ ;~ 7 ~~ -_ . J ~ ^ ~ : k _ l i a~ ~h7 t// 2 ~~ ' CrL"-RALD.L powcRS ^<i~!z~J ~~ r ~- vf,~ ., / i•J/ !.., ~ / Z4c i'; ~ rt~-_~ , . .~ r , iii//Zt l.t /(_} `~L i v i //• ~ / , L,!/ ~' r ~ : ''i ~~ '>> fJ < ~' ,. \ ~ He ~S~U ~ 2 ` y ~ r ~ ~ ~ V• ~~.~ T0: C7my COU;v'CIL - CI?Y OP RA:C: i'.0 CUCAi:O?dGA, CALTFCRS?IA Y;e, tl:e undersigned, are resir'.ents of tk:e ity of ancho Cuc smonU , ros_uiri; in t_ Jr; bile I" ~~p ar}c known as ~~L located at /• ~e~' ~ IY)1J wLerc r:e r:~n s.^.aces o accer:odate o r ;.oTii e F.om s. Due o continuing rent increases, wl:'_ch alweys soem to exceed the cost of li': s.U index; and ~"nrurQ raL: of inflation, c+e 'r.c ruby netiticn t;:e City of Rancho ;'uc amonga to enact an ordinarco cst a:~lishin~ a rent control or stabilization boar;; to review past, present acd futur< rent: ir,cre ases to determine if tire; ~.~ are justifiable, both to tP~:e ovmer and to t'rc tenant, and if not justifiable to tope tl:e ne.:essary stc k;c to rc:~!e d, t'..e situation. +Jhe;+~e:,s ~:o feel tl:e =ark Owm.~r is emit lc:'. to realize a re::enable reti:rn from his investment: there axe instances were t%at rec~..rn might be +eTT::ed cr,reaso reble, or execs s. ve, :d.is .:r ~etcs ::nduc fi nar.cial :.aresk3p on u:any of us who are '_:vin~~ on fixed Lncor.,es, t:.at could ca•.:::esome of us to seek Coc;nty, St ate~~or Federal Aid. Eel: cation of our haaes is ::ot the a;xv~er as tt.e r~:lacatdon cost is i'inancially ins sr.~.oun+;able, cost ink from '.^„00 tc :°5000 deperci.^.f; c; cite size cf our homes, distance of tY.e move, etc. k':e recpe~_ttully request your attention to t..".is ratter as Boor. as ?racticable, t •, ~ fk<iLVwa-- //,; ~,~ y r ~~ G ~, ,~~ T-- r . ~~~ ~ ~ ~ " : -~ U, ''~' ~~ T0: CTTT CO'J:;CIL - CITI' OF RA:d:,ri0 CUCA.'•;OD:CA, CAL?FCRP:IA Cte, tk:e undersigned, are residents of tl:e C~ty of Rancho CUC::mo nga, res.ding in t::o t:obilo Iio.~~e Par~Jc nown as /\ 4Mp~/,Q V+~LL~ lot atcd at 9bOE~ ~~~s /;:r~ wt•.er.. re r<~es to necer.odate oun 1„obw e !.om s, Due o tout in: ink rent increases, wk:S. rh always seem to exceed the cost of li~:~in~ index: and •:nrual rat:' of inflation, we Y,ernby ?etitiai tk:e City- c_*' ?tancho Cucamonga to enact an orGinance ost ablishin~ a rent control or stabilization boar.: to review nest, present and future rent. increases to determine if tk:c;,r are justifiable, both to tk:c owner and to the tenant, and if not ,justifiable to take tk:e ne;:essary st.cps to reir:ed; tLe situation. P!!:e re;s '.:c feel ti:c =ark Owr.:~r is entitled to realize a re::onablo rr,tt;rn from ins inee stment, there are instances tvk.ere t!-.at reti..rn might be !armed ~'::nreasorablr,, or excessive. Tics ::r~.; atos :'.ndue fS nancial ~~ ards:.ip on ,,^.:any of us who are livin'~ on fined incocres, t:_at could caceesome of us to seek County, State~or e<ieral Aid. eel cation of oiu'i~omes is not the a: xwe ~~ as tLe r~~lccation cost is financially ins:rr.:our table, cost ink fro^. ':?r.00 to ~:'000 de?,enGi::~ c:; ii:e size of our homes, distance of tk:e move, etc. l':'e re spe.a Rtl ly request ,our attention to t::i.: matter as soon as practicable, '~/ ~~~~=y ,.~ ~ < C/~ ~ ' , i~ i ~£ Y7'L L e E- L ~ ~~~. O" 1sV _ ' ~ •II ; C•;". ,i'I ~ ~ ~ • t I ~ Z- ' ~ ~ - ~~ d C ~E: ~~ T0: C1TY COU9CIL - CITY Or' RA:: Ci!0 CUCALiOiJGA, CALL: CRTiIA l've, t}.e undersigned, are residents of the City of Ranch C r:monga, ros?ding in the L[obil ?Sor. park k~jown as A:~.m-nxc loc rated rat ~~'~~ /~g~. e.;V 2 .{ wi:c rc; ~~:e r<•n s,races o nccor,odate our I,:ob',i1e Iiom s. Duo o continuing rent increases, wk:ich always seem to exceed the cost of living rode;: and ~.:nrual rai.. of inflation, we i.ereby i.etit ion t}:e City of Rancho ~ucnmonga to enact an ordinance cst a'i:lishin~ a rent control or stabilization boar:i to review past, present and future rent increases to determine if they are justifiable, both to the owner and to the tenant, and if not justifiable to taA:e tk:e necessary ste;;s to rer.~~ed; t}_e situation. Pf-^erer.s ~ce feel tk:e Fark C;vnor is entitles. to realize a re.~onable rett:rn from his investment, there are instances where t:~:at reti.rn might be iern:ed ~,:nreasonable, or er.ce ssive. Ti,is ,:r"ates ~~:ndue Si narcial cardship on many of us who are living on fixed incomes, t}:at could caucesome of us to seek County,. State or rederal Aid. Relccation of our hones is riot the a:-xae~• as the relocation cost is finanaislly ins :rr.:our.cable, costing from "2;OG to ''5000 de renting o^ t'r.e size oP our homes, distance of tk:e move, etc. l".'e respectfully request dour attention to t: is matter as soon as practicable, ~'~.cs i u'^~.~.tq,~ ~~ e ~LF ,/ .~ ~~-" r.! ~ ,, , ~ "-C lk~ t r.2~c '.~ ' 5 Y , T0: CITS CODICIL - CITY OF fiq:: ii0 CL'CA: C?:GA, CALIFOHS:Iq i';e, tixe undersigned, are rc-silents of ti:e Ci y of Aar:ghGOy uc:;monga, rosidin(; in t!:c P.:obile I:ome Park l;rown as 1/ locatod at gdoa ,Ba..Q.:.,o /L/. C2L!°e xi...., wk~.ex•:.. c:v ren s?aces o ac ecr:odate our 1,.oFi7.e Isom s. Duo ~-continu?n~ rc nt in:;re ases, wlach always soem to exceed the cost' of li^: ir.~ rode:: and _nnual rat. .~ of in Tlat.ion, we i~:ereby ?etit.i on ti:e ,,^.ity cf 1?ancho 'uc ntnonEa to enact an orclnarce ~ctcLlishir.~ a rent control or stabillzat ion boar:: to review Past, Present and future runt increases to determine if t::ey are justifiable, both to ti:e ovner arci to ti:e tenant, and if not justifiable to take tiro re::ensary stc ns to rcmed,. tl~_e situation, y'Jhe re ra ';.e feel ti:e Park Cwnor is eat Stlc~f to realize a re::onable rctt:rn ?'rom 'r.is invastmr•nt, there are instances where t;'.at rettrn m1Cht be t.ern:ed '.,nreasonable, or excessive. Ti.ic ~,~r ales endue £lnancial i~ardsLip on many' of us who are 1!.vin~~ on fixed incomes, ti:at could c an, esor.:e of us to seek Cot: rty, State or etieral qt c, i;olecation of our homos is ;:ot tl;e 3'XPie;' 19 ti.e relocation cost is financially ir;s~.rr.;our,Lable, cost ink from ".^,i OC.i to ;'9000 depen::in~ a: ik.e siee of our 7'.ome s, distar:ce of t7:e move, etc. Nie respe aiA11y request dour attention to t!:is natter es scon as Practicable, NG(l o~+•o ,' /:' `?- ~,; ~~~ .1 7 L, / ~ ~~ ' K/ 1 ~yVC Y a2~~ _lYy~ ~. g T r ~ P-t- C ~s.•~ ^ ~ ti1 V '~ , T0: CITY CGUfiC1L - CITY C RA:C;}i0 CUCA.',10?:Gk, CALIBCRP'IA t;e, the underslUned, are residents of tl:e C}1~,ty of Rancho C~c cmong¢, rosidin~ in t}:e Iiobilo i;opo Par knovm as /~u,ss-c~~q, {/~t:f.~ located at~_gt~ .1cza~[, ,~ wl:erc.. rre r+~n s^aces o seec:;ocatc our :,.o i e }iom s. Duo o cont.im:in~ rent Sn;:reuses, which alrreys seem to exceed the cost of li~,ir.~; Sn<ie;: and ~.nr.ual rat. of inflation, we hereby ;:etition t}:e C}ty c!• itancho :'uc amonea to enset nn ordlnence cst anlishin` a rent control or stabilization boar,i to review past, present a~.d future rent increases to determine if tk:ey are justifiable, both to the owner ar.<i to t}:e tenant, and if rot justifiable to to}:e t::e re~essary etc us to rer.,ed,, t:.e situation, Cv k:e rr s ce feel ti:e Psrk Cvun,~r is entitles to realize a rerenable rctarn from iris investment, there are instances wi:ere t:~at ret+,rn might be !erc~:ed ~,;r.:easonable, or excessive. T1:Ss ~~.r-. atca "~ndue fi nanci:a ''.arPs'..ip on many of us who are 1`_vi[;~ on fi~:ed _ncome s, t}tat could ca;;eesome of us to seek County, Stste or ~ereral Aid, F,elecation of our homrs is not the :,. xwer as to relocation cost is financially ins.rmoun+,able, cost!n~- from "..^,i 00 to ~"'5000 sepe n:.ix:U, on !},e sJ ::o of our }tom<a, distance of the move, ete, l:'e re spe ot:ully request ,'our attention to this r.:atter es score ss ?;racti cable, G ~~ ~ ~ / /.. /~ ' r. . ~ C(y~ .wi-j .~ i( , L ~C ,~/ - ~~lL! ~ ~ ll1.~ti ~ ~ , ~// ' E~ « t ~ ~ ~~ f ~1 . .~._ - ~ _ ~~ ~ c tiu!~ . ~l4 Ltti~ _ i .y `%~ / ~P L~ /•t 1 T0: CITI' COU^.7CIL - CITY OP F:AI.: i:O f,UCA1,:02JG6, CAhTFCitTiIA lSe, the undersigned, are residents of tl-.e City}• of Rancho,CUCrmonls, residing in the i.;obile home Park known as ~~„4„_ / pj„ locatod nt %~~~,_~a~ zY^ wY:<•. s•~~~~xe r:~n s[:nc•es o acece:edatc our .,:oTi e LT om s, "Due ~o`cont inu'ng rent increases, which always soem to exc.ecd the cost of living index and onrual rat, of inflation, the hereby petition tt:e City o` Rancho Cucamonga to enact an ordinance est sblishir.;; a rent control or stabilization bonr;i to review past, present acd future rent increases to deterrnine if thoy are +ustifiable, both to ti:e ct•+ner and to the tenant, and if r,ot justifiaY~le to take ti:e necessary stc ps to rer:ed; tLe situation. VJ:^c±e:s ~c fezl ti~,c Fark Cwn:~r 1^ eat it lee Co realize a rc,~onable rc,t~~~,rn ^rom ias .invcatment, thore are ir.stancos where that re t: rn rdgkrt be termed wrreasonable, or excessive. Tiers er~:at cs rndue fl narcie.l i:ardst.ip on .vary oP us who ara livi n~ or, fixed 7.ncomes, ti:at could. caul esome of us to seek County, State or ^ecieral A.id. P.elccation of our bomos ss not the a~xv+er as t:^.e r~~locction cost is financially ins ,rr.:ountable, costing fror.: °3i 00 to "5000 cape r.riir,~ on tt~.e size cf our T,emca, distance of the move, etc, Cde recpe~~t fully request ;your attention to tics mater ns secs as uract;cable. ~~ G ~J ?/ C~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~j ~ _ _ ~} ^~ +~; J . ~~~ ~~ti , r ~(, C C~~u~ ~,~ r,. _.~„~~~,, '1 2.., City Council Hinutes March 4, 1981 Page 10 7. ADJOllRNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded 6y Mikels to adjourn the meeting in memory of Leonard Corezyca, Chairman of the Historical Cononission who passed away recently. Council adjourned to a Legal Session to reconvene on Monday, March 9, 1981 a[ 7:00 p. m. for the General Plan public hearings. Meeting adjourned at 11:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Au[helet Deputy City Clerk City Council Minutes March 4, 1981 Page 9 The Council spent considerable time discussing this amongst themselves with the City Attorney. Nr. Dougherty said the Council hoe to make a finding for the property not in the Blayney Alternative area, and find that protect is consistent with the Blayney General Plan. He said this gave the city a problem in the alternative area because there vas no proposed land use designation. Ne suggested [hat in any map that the Planning Commission tentatively approves until we have a general plan adopted that a condition of approval could be inserted and that condition be that the final map not be approved unless it is consistent with [he general plan at the time of final map approval. Ralph Lewis, Lewis Homes, said they would agree to such a condition as the City Attorney dust outlined. They would take their chances. Doug Hone said he would not support such a plicy. He said it was possible that someone could proceed, go through the Planning Commission and staff, and have a condition happen that a hearing occur on a general plan on a subsequent date and have a group of citizens at that hearing and Council feel moved to change a consistency situation and the person would not even know about i[ until he was ready to have his final map done. Ne said the reputation and credibility of the City would be very much at stake. .Tim Banks questioned how OPR could make such changes. He thought [his vas inconsistent with the Government Code. Mz. Dougherty explained that our problem was Chat we only have a land use element not an existing general plan. OPR Ss saying that Council can approve a development if it le consistent with the existing land use element and the pzopoaed general plan. But in that alternative area, there is no existing land use element. So ve are excluded frw considering any- thing in there unless [he previous condition set by OPR is modified. OPR says if City Council agrees, then the City can go ahead and consider development for the alternative area if it fe consistent with [he proposed general plan. Ron Tannebaum Felt that if Council considered this suggestion, they wculd be opening up to many problems. Bruce Chitiea said that a condition like this gave the Council less flexibility rather Chan mote by moving from an open to cloned political process. Doug Gorgen said he had a tract in that alternative area also end wanted to know how this all affects him. Nr. Lam stated that his tract was processable because he had a much lover density, therefore, he could come under everyone of the categories. The City Attorney said that if Council denied this recommendation by the OPR, then they would not be able to come back at a later date until after the final adoption of the general plan and change your mind. He said that if Council did not take action, then they were under the old conditions, and when they finished the hearings on the land use element end were satisfied at what you wan[, then you could consider this at that time. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by MSkela to close the debate. The motion carried by the fo11oa1ng vote: AYES: Palombo, Bridge, Schlosser. NOES: Proat, Mikela. ABSENT: None. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo Co table the issue. Motion carried unanimously $-D. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. The Ci[y Attorney requested time after the meeting to meet with Council in closed session regarding a legal matter. f City Council Minutes March 4, 1981 Page 8 5. CITY NANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. SA. RECOMMENDATION TO PllBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR ALLOCATION £OR ANNITIONAL ELINE RATES. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. The recommendation submi [Cad to Council was [o join with other communities of the WesC End of San Bernardino County to request the Public Utilities Commission Co have the Southern California Edison Company transfer the West End from Region C to Region H, thus making the area eligible for lifeline rates. This would result in a special lifeline rate for electricity used for air conditioning during the ho[ summer months. Jennifer Alloway was present representing the Public Utilities Commission to answer any questions of the Council. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting to the public Ear comment. There being none, he closed the public portion of the meeting. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution 81-28 and to Waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Jim Robinson read title of Resolution No. 81-28. RESOLUTION NO. 81-28 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQllESTING TRANSFER OF SOUTHERN CALIPORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S ONTARIO DISTRICT FROM REGION C TO REGION H. 58. RECUMNiND ENDORSEMENT OF SENATE BILL-2. A MEASURE CONCERNING THE STATEWIDE PLANNING PROCESS. Staff report by Jack Lam. Councilman Mikels said that had this law been ir. effect, the State would not have been able to change the transportation budget which he had talked about a[ the beginning of the evening. The law would prohibit state agencies from overstepping their authority, and thus making changes in plane by local or regional agencies. This Bill would establish uniform public hearing process for modifications of local elements of Stale plans. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to support Senate 8111-2 and to direct staff [o convey this to our locally elected representatives in Sacra- mento. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. SC. THE PROCESSING OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IN THE JOHN BLAYNEY ALTERNATIVES AREA. Staff report by Jack Lam. The City of Rancho Cucamonga recently received a letter from the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR) which modified their original approval of exten- sion for the General Plan. Originally there was a condition which stipulated that prior to approval of any development application during the General Plan process, a finding must be made [ha[ the project was conals[en[ with both the existing and the proposed General Plan. The current modification would allow the City in those alternative areas the flexibility of proceeding with development app licaclons if the City Council wished. OPR said [hat where the existing General Plan does not contain any adopted land use policy, the City Council shall substitute the following finding: "There is reasonable probability that she land use proposed by a tentative subdivision map, parcel map, zone change, or land use permit will be consistent with the proposed general plan." CSty Council Minutes March 4, 1981 Page 7 4D. CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM. Jack Lam presented the staff report. Jim Robinson read the title of Ordinance No. 139. ORDINANCE N0. 139 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A GENERAL PENALTY FOR WILLFUL FAILURE TO APPEAR AS INDICATED ON A CITATION ISSUED FOR VIOLATIONS OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Mayor Schlosser set March 18 for second reading. Councilman Frost wanted [o know the need for this and asked if [here have been some problems. Mr. Lam stated that staff felt it was n¢cessary to put on the citation a penalty for Failure to appear in order to give more clout to the citation program. The Ci[y Attorney said this was a standard procedure for assuring appearances on the cltatlon. Mr. Frost said this was in an[fcipation to a need, no[ because of an answer to a problem. The City Attorney said that was correct, and that this was the "teeth" to the program. Frost Chen requested more backup when Chia came up for second reading. Mayor Schlosser asked if [here were any public comments to Resolution No. 81-30. There were none, therefore, [he Mayor closed Che meeting for public comment. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 81-30 and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Jim Robinson read the title of Resolution No. 81-30. RESOLUTION NO. 81-30 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIPORNIA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN CITY Et4'LOYEES TO ENFORCE CITY ORDINANCES AND ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CODES REFERRED TO THEREIN. ~~:~~' City Council Hinutea March 4, 1981 Page 6 Mayor pro-tam Bridge asked for those who wished to address Council Sn favor of the District to now come forth. Speaking in favor were: 1. Richard Borston, Milliken State Investors. He said he had 20 acres ]ust north of 4eh Street. He felt the Assessment District was important for the development of the general area and to have the same district without being fragmented. He said the district would eventually benefit them because with the Assessment District formation, the development would profit and values would increase. 2. George H. Minmack, representing B. D. Galleano, et. al, owners of 50 acres on the south side of Arrow Highway east of Haven. They felt that it was in the best interests of the entire area that the storm drains be built and be built according to a master plan. We now have a master plan, and they think it is workable. Ne said they were only affected by the storm drain portion of the plan. He said they needed the drain coming from the Daon property and would like [o have it completed in a reasonable time. He did not want to pay his money Eor drainage and then Find someone dumping water onto him, and thus hurting his development. He said that anyone who did not become a part of the plan should be done by a contract with specified timing -- what they will build, when, and how. Ne expressed that the cost should be based upon the total acreage, and not let each person take care of his own problem. He said they did not want any Changes on line 5-D which sae [he line that drains Mr. Galleano's property. He was willing [o pay for the benefit. 3. Robert Houtz, chief engineer for the Santa Fe Land Improvement Company and owner of 130 acres on the south of Arrow Highway about where Milliken Street will eventually go. He suggested [hat this be held over for thirty days so the various interest groups could work together to come up with some solutions. He said line 9-A served his property. 4. Chuck Caldwell, representing himself and partner, Cadf.llac Fairview. They have 85 acres at the northeast comer of Haven and 8th Street. They recog- nized the benefits the Assessment District would bring to the area and were in favor of the formation of the district. 5. Seff Sceranka, representing the Lucas' family. He spoke in favor of the District and encouraged the Council to move ahead with it and not wait. 6. Betty McKay, owner representing 6 acres of land. She felt it was to everyone's benefit to support a master plan. She said the area had bean engineered in the past under the County, but there were some who had cpposed those plans. If they had proceeded, [hen the drainage system would be in today. She encouraged Council to proceed. There being no further public responses, [he Mayer pro-tam closed [he public hearing. Councilman Mikela asked far the total percentage of protests at this time. Nr. Hamilton announced that there were 49.04 percent protests. However, Mr. Bridge seated that many were conditional. Motion: Moved by Palom6o, seconded by Mikels to continue the hearing to April 15 in order to give staff time Co work out problems with the property owners. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikela, Palombo, and Bridge. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser, who had excused himself from the diecuesion because he owned property in the area. Mayor pro-tam Bridge called a recess at 9:40 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:50 p. m. with all members of the council and staff present. City Council Minutes Hatch 4, 1981 Page 5 7. Eili Kirkland of KBL, property located south of 8th Street and bordering an Che vest side of Naven. He said they did no[ want the District since this area has leas drainage problems. Ie was a matter of getting value for their dollar and that $4700 per acre was not value from their viewpoint. 8. Cregg Fromme, Fromme Investments, property located on bih Street and Turner Avenue. He stated he was impressed from Che drainage meetings that he had attended [hat the group east of Haven, who would 6e paying For Che majority of the drainage system, was not particularly concerned about the west of Haven group. They were not concerned if they did have their own drainage die trio. The facts that its 149X minimum of an increase added expense to the west Haven group as opposed to a 1211X added expense to Che test of the District if the west Haven group were allowed Co form was very important statiatlca, 9. Jack McKay spoke in Favor of proceeding with the Assessment District. Mayor pro-tam Bridge stated ChaC Council was now hearing from those protesting Che formation of the District. 10. Vito DLVEto Francesco, representing the Sylvester property. He said that in regard Co the Sylvester property there are no plans to develop the pro- perty and its not on the market for sale. In view of these facts, they requested the Sylvester property be deleted both for streets and drainage purposes. They also wanted to go on record as joining with Joe DLIorio in asking that the matter be referred back for father study ao that the District can move fotvaxd with [he exclusion of the Sylvester property both as to streets and drainage. He also stated that a concern of theirs was ChaC if the entire district went in, what assurances would property owners have that they could go to a future buyer of the property and assure them that there will not be any future drainage problems. 11, Bill Milliken, member of Che west Haven group and manager of the La Mancho Golf Course. He said only those west of Haven was protesting. The reason East Naven group would like Co see the district formed over as much acreage as possible so they could have as many people pay for this drainage problem ae possi- ble; that way St would not cost them as much. 12. Horton DeVore. He handed Sn a written petition to Mr. Hamilton at Che time he spoke. They were owners of Parcel 236 aC southeast corner of the Asaeas- ment District. He said the only proposed benefit to them would be line 19-D for storm drain benefits. They were protesting Che District because they felt the $4700 assessment was not fair for his property since [hey basically did not have storm drain proDlema, 13. Ban Wick, owner of 10 acres at the corner of Rochester and 8th Street. Ne said he was speaking as par[ of the previous petition submitted by Mr. DeVore. They were requesting the Consultant and Engineering Department to look at line 19-D to see if they could become a separate disirlc c. It would compose of all the pro- perty owners along Rochester Avenue. 14. Keith Walker, representing owner of Parcel No. 257 south of the parcel owned by Mr. Nick. They were concerned about the method of assessment and protesting inclusion of line 19-D et this time. They were also concerned about the re-routing of Rochester Avenue. Mayor pro-[em Bridge asked iE there were others who wished to address the issue in protea t. There being no response, Fir. Bridge called a recess et 8:45 p. m. The meeting reconvened at 9:05 p.m. with all members of Che Council and staff present. .~ ~: . City Council Minutes March 4, 1981 Page 4 of Assessment District Na. 79-1. At this time the City Council would be dealing in generalities with [he Smprovemertta, the costs, and the methods of the asaesa- ment spread. If Council proceeds to the second public hearing, then Council would be authorizing staff to proceed with detailed plans and specifications. At that time Council would have final plane, construction bids, and proposals for the sale of bonds. However, aG Chis time, he said the Council would be dealing with schematics, general nature, location, and extent of the improve- ments. City Council could abandon the plena, proceed, or continue Che matter. Mr. Brown stated that the testimony to be heard should deal with the boundaries, works of improvements, ar method and formula proposed by the Aeaeaement Engineer. He said the law requires that assessments be apportioned to the properties in accordance to the benefits they receive from the works of improvements. He then turned the meeting over the Walt Hamilton, the Assessment Engineer, who presented a report on [he written protests which had been received. He announced [hat a total of 46.1I protests had been received up to the time and place of the hearing. He summarized the debt report, briefing Council as to the extent of the works of improvements and explained the method and formula that was used for Che spread of the assessments. Hayor pro-tam Bridge opened the meeting for public hearing to those who had submitted a written protest. Those speaking in protest were: 1. Joe DiIOrio, representing Richard Or[wein of the Roll/Lyon Company. He stated they were not totally against the Asaeaement District. He said there was disagreement with the street layout. Some property owners were not ready to develop their property, therefore, did not want Che streets put in a[ the present time. He said what everyone wanted to do was to ad~uat the streets, and he felt that if this were tabled for about thirty days, these adjustments could be worked out to everyone's satisfaction. He stated that regarding the storm drains, they needed about thirty days to work out the philosophy of how to beat aproad [he coats. 2. Jim Westling, O'Donnell Brigham. He stated they were in favor of the formation of the Assessment Dlatrict. Regarding the written protest which they submitted, he said they were concerned about the spread of the coats. However, they felt that this could be worked out. Re expressed a disagreement with the location of the storm drain 19-A. They wanted [o have [hie drain put back on the east property line where 3t originally had been placed. 3. Jack Corrigan, Daon Corporation. Ne seated that they could take care of their own problems, and they simply would not want to be a part of the Assess- ment District. 4. Larry Turpin, Assistant City Engineer for Ontario. He stated that Ontario was concerned about the impact [he storm drain would have on the properties down scream in the City of Ontario. 5. Nal Haldin, eiv11 engineer representing property owners west of Haven Avenue. He stated that the property owners west of Haven would have to pay considerably more for storm drains if they joined [his Assessment Dlatrict. It was more cost effective for them Co form their own Dlatrict. He stated that this area represents approxlmataly 138.32 acres and that about 75 percent of the property oanere have protested the Assessment Dlatrict. 6. Richard Clayton, plant manager of Martin Narrio[ta facility, west of Haven and south of 8th Street. Ne stated [hat he sae asked to make the following statement: "That [heir attorney said that by law special essesaments required special benefits and they could not see any benefits to their parcel of land in this assessment and the possibility of legal action ie being considered." 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. City Council Minutes March 4, 1981 Page 3 4A. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE N0. 105, RELATING TO PARR DEDICATIONS IN NEW SUB- DIVISIONS. Staff report by Nil Liam Holley. Potential problems have surfaced regarding Ordinance No. 105-B. Therefore, staff requested [ha[ [he ordinance be withdrawn from consideration at this time. The original ordinance would remain in effect. Mayor Schlosser asked if 'there were any objections to the request for withdrawal of [he ordinance. There were none from the public or council. Council concurred with the staff's recommendation for withdrawal. Mayor Schlosser announced the Council would adjourn to an Executive Session with the City Attorney. Council adjourned a[ 7:20 p. m. and reconvened at 7:25 p.m. with all council members present. 4fl. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO DESIGNATE HISTORICAL LANDMARAS. Staff report by William Holley. This was [he second reading for Ordinance No. 138 which would deaignaie the Alta Loma Honor Roll, the palm and eucalyptus street tree plantings along Victoria and Etiwanda Avenues and the Chaffey-Garcia House as historical landmarks. Jim Robinson read the title of Ordinance No. 138. ORDINANCE NO, 138 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE ALTA LOMA HONOR ROLL, THE PALM AND EUCALYPTUS STREET TREE PLANTINGS ALONG THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST CORNERS OP VICTORIA AND ETIWANDA AVENUES, AND THE CHAFFEY-GARCIA HOUSE AS CITY HISTORIC LANDMARKS. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palombo [o waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being rto response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to approve and adopt Ordinance No. 138. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 4C. INDUSTRIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 10-01. Mayor Schlosser announced that he would step dam from Che Assessment District public hearing since he had his business and owned property in the area under consideration. Ne stated [ha[ Mayor pro-tam Bridge would conduct the hearing. Mayor pro-tam Bridge announced that this was the time and place for hearing the protests or objections to the "Report" and proposed construction and all other related matters in Assessment District No. 79-1, City Clerk Wasserman reported that Notice had been given in [he manner and form ae required 6y law (pursuant to the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code) and an affidavit for the filing of the boundary map and certificate of mailing were on file in the Clerk's office. Lloyd Hubba, city engineer, ehen turned the messing over eo Max Brown, bond counsel for the project. Mr. Brown summarised the procedure to be taken. He said this was the first of two public hearings relating to the formation City council Minutes March 4, 1981 Page 2 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81-7-4 for $181,789.49. b. Acceptance of Parcel Map 5703: located on the west side of Center Avenue between Victoria and Honte Vista. RESOLUTION N0. 81-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP N0. 5703. c. Acceptance of Parcel Map 6627: located on the south side of Wilson on the west side of Hermosa. RESOLUTION N0. 81-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP N0. 6627. d. Approval [o advertise the Carnelian Channel Construction project to seek bids for the construction of Carnelian Channel. Estimated cost -- $374,000. e. Property Transfer Tax. Recoomiend engaging the services of Mr. Gene Tidwell a[ a fee of $S.oo per hour plus reproduction costs to research the County's tax records regarding property transfer fees. f. Bet public hearing date of March 18, 1981 for Zone Change No. 80-12 -- Harmakian. A request for a change of zone from A-1-5 (limited agriculture, 5 ac_c lot minimum sizs) :o R 1-2C (s £ng le family res ldeu iial, 2:,000 sy ones foot-reinimum size lot) for 24.36 acres of land located on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN 1061-171-02. g. Alcoholic Beverage License for Lily T. Tribis, La Mariposa, 8807 Center Street. Item had been removed from [he February 18 agenda for investigation. A Eull sheriff's report has been submitted to Council. h. Approval of State Agreement No. 08-5420 and Program Supplement No. 3. This will enable the City to take advantage of Federal Aid Emergency Relief funding for [he emergency opening of FAU Routes -- R190, R060, RO51, R066, and R0194 (Hellman Avenue, Arrow Highway, Base Line Road, 4th Street, and Carnelian Street) as a result of the January-February 1980 storm. RESOLUTION N0. 81-27 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COllNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE IXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5420 AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT N0. 3. i. Request to set March 18, 1981 as a public hearing date for consideration of the proposed modifications to the Omnitrans routes in Rancho Cucamonga. j. Request for Community Services Director to attend [he Parks and Recreation Society Annual Conference, March 6-9. Request is a budgeted item. k. Release of bonds: Tract No. 9423: located southwest corner of Heryl Street and south of Base Line. Owner: Coral Investment, Inc. Cash Staking Bond $ 2,350.00 Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo [o approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ,. March 4, 1981 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, March 4, 1981. The meeting was called [o order by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Cirl Scouts from Troop 1180 led the flag salute. Pcesent: Councilmen Sames C. Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Also present: City Manager Lauren M. Wasserman, Assistant City Manager James Robinson, Deputy City Attorney Robert Dougherty, Community Development Director Jack Lam, City Bngineer Lloyd Hubba, Community Services Director William Holley, and Finance Director Harry ^empey. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the minutes of February 4 and February 18, 1981. Motion carried unanimously. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. It was announced that Mr. Leonard Gurczyca, Chairman of the Historical Commission, recently passed away and the meeting would be adjourned in his memory. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Bridge to direct [he Historical Commission [o prepare a Resolution in honor of Mr. Gorczyca to be forwarded tm the City Council for adoption at the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously. b. Councilman Mikels reported that at the SanBag meeting which me[ ':not morning the County Transportation Commission took action on [he Transportation Improve- ment Program (TIP) which will be forwarded to SCAG and then on to the State Eor inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program. Because of the formulas that have been adopted for [he TIP this year, due to lack of funding, they do not allow the inclusion for funding for any projects that were not in Che five year Tranaportation Improvement Program previously. He said when this was considered last year, our County Transportation Cosonlasion recommended the full five year funding in [he TIP, but When it Leached the State level, it was not approved. Instead the State inserted funding for right-of-way for the Foothill Freeway for the first year only. Under the guidelines in effect for [his year if it was not in the TIP for more than the current year, you could not place it in again; 1[ becomes a new project. In effect, the guidelines pre- clude any inclusion of right-of-way protection funding in any year after this. When the California Transportation Commission met in Claremont, they indicated in Resolution form they would provide right-of-way protection funding through December 1982. SanBag took action to attach a Resolution lndicat Sng support for the prior action taken by the State Tranaportation Cononiaeion which will be attached to their TIP submittal. Councilman Frost indicated he though[ it was appropriate to send a letter to our legislators over the Mayor's signature indicating support of the action taken by SanBag and relating our concerns. Council concurred with this. c. Mayor Schlosser read a Proclamation [o the Girl Scouts Erom Troop 1180 proclaming March B-14 as Cirl Scout Week in Rancho Cucamonga. ~; r~.z. >,~,~:~;07, rcrcrrine.r. ~rorsu,r..r.~~orr March 16, 1981 Honorable Mayor Philip Chlosser Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Calif., 91730 Dear Dtayor Chlosser toe have been advised that the City Council will be hearing a matter pertaining to rent increases at certain mobile home parY.s in the Rancho Cucamonga area at your regularly scheduled meeting, tdarch 18, 1981. We were not informed of this until Thursday, tdarch 12 and because of prior committments, I will not be able to be in attendance at your Council meeting, hence this letter to you and your colleagues on the Council As a former Mayor and current Councllma n, I am indeed mindful of the many factors you as duly elected city officials must consider in rendering a final public decision. As you consider this matter of possible rent control, brought about by the actions of only certain mobile home park owners or a:perators, I would implore that your august body continue to ask these two questions before a final decision is made. One: Can you name one community, one county, one state or one country than has ever benefitted From rent control ? 'an arbitrary decision made by individuals in defiance of a free and competitive market. Two: If one segment of~the housing market(in this particular instance Lhe mobile home market) is subject- ed to an artificial and mandated control, how can the other segments, ie, apartment houses and single family residences be excluded from similar controls ? Unless these two questions can he answered in the affirmative, I am of the opinion that it would be diff- icult for the Council to enact proceedings or controls that are contrary to the principles of free enterprise and proper governmental ,jurisdiction. The course of action your Council recommended the last time this matter came before you- open discussion between the concerned parties - is in my opinion still the proper course to pursue. ~,,,"1p4'~`,no,,,,, H'00'1'I111,1, .110RI-dti J1.•\OR _Z_ We have owned our mobile home park for more than fifteen years and during that period we have raised our rents only five times. The last two rent increases have been on an annual basis and have been tied in with the Consumer Price Index. We feel that this has been fair and equitable and have explained this to our tenants each time. I regret not being able to attend year meeting and wish to thank you for the opportunity of expressing our views in writing. Sincerely yours, 0. Warren Hillgr<en Owner CC: City Council Members James Robinson, Assistant City Manager Rancho Cucamonga R~'tVT CONTROL: PROBL>E'MS~~'~-s~ ' A!V© ALTERNATIVES '.: ::. ,~ .. ~~ ''~~~~ lY BOB RONKA . wf AMORlf QTY LOUNGUNAN ~ ~ ~~ ~ •' ' ~ •'" Hoer mfrnlcr .' i11NJr'~.r W. IIrNO eervee IM cemmeMln NtMMIY NOnam/, rbelm NNe, f)ImN, rlNM., AMIe. fYMeni, Telunp.. ~ . fNNa NNe NN IeYO Vlew TlrrNe. Ib an NntN • cq cON<OnM M MOI ]I. N)), wM {t.{% N M Mlw. bMlahf IMp h Me NwM NNrywwp MINI taeM chu N )N, rr. HOMO ncNrN NM B.A. {OpMI In NleNrf hOm ..y BIhUa1 UN.wM)en{NIe J.D•{eYN MOm HYMN 4w fcMµln /q]lM lf){MIOreO{NMNYMNM nNI 41NO yw $e<IMn N IM Ln frnonh YOfOF M bN Fnm 1fH b lfl$ M frNCNNN N l MhdfM h mwN pMN rwhY.Mp. waen NnanelN mNMwNN hN.NN fMe h W A;IfNee W YONeeo CNMb. HO h l IMmn //5+.~ :' BNN•AVNtlele mempw N IM f/IIanNNll BMNN N GAB. .. ~ ~ . ~(Y• IION pMNMIMN !V ON M MIIF1'W )NYIp nICINN1q UNnl11p/ la ~ ~ ~.~ [NNII NMlfel\ $M1M p HUD I1Wlinp OIIW we Nlww pj : [bNYblbn to Me OpbOIIM rNNI <olb YI{I r{ flrNhraq M rzrglM¢ ., hprM IM1 ltlfNMf. l rrl wrYhp 10 oMOin mrl SeaYN • IrNI fpop ~ .J'M{IBIr N1ew ON mNNNe incemOIOMN{beNbf glWnh M.;.~; ~w11rIC!{IMM OrMlKevOpe OrrywO wnoh ewcwMe leoN rYlNmehr 7 VYyhBlYmlof reM eonva MMlpry{VINMNA.mm{f, mAwMOI.,,"_rN1~ONigolebnNp eeraopmaO bw.corlnwNip wer Mil lllrMlM.~ ~`.'. iNpfle<o rM .rmpnnir! .iln M pgfwn MYNCyeI INM{N re hchp, 1 ~ .':;'n: (n N[Nbn, Npl ~rnwl M. bMN ro bhp IsWrF wNf b. M q M . . .MMaHbnlNdllynwn MlOOhwNNllri Mrl.pKlrMlNMpreNN4 .. 'MpiiON.fiwmOl.apj. YaANnNFNIw oW NNI NreMMNhf MrN 'Q:~Ir{Nlly, nnl eemra wwk Ywp relNw{lel iwN.ia;n. BuLnbdllrmM ' ION,hlIMl rNaIW{{erphph{lFr4'bpwaunanB NmNIO..1MN NbN' , :,TnNMMmpawlpl Mpecl on nwNrip ONMMIIr weaF merO MnaIBh M~'' {{{{O~11{IIBI!/bMeN{OiNal YOpnONNbMpgi Newrwwlpry '. MrNO MM HYnpN oulcYly h recOrc nIeINM rYNNPOKNeI InY rMKI M ~~bOON cOnebKlbn, melnanmer-.YN. e{NY.MIe.:.1nN :neM.FNOh ": BObasN Glmcll a 3wMwn GNYNI Mi M{le{IN IMI loe Mprll wn. •:, NMNw welO Mo eYNOCbIN lbgN:)TrwwM NKO tf)e. lne Com '•:NmY FrIeO IMN lMwO IMI mlhlaunc{lr;d roNb welt AIrO aharly -'iNN Yr n pwemt m mw Inl ewMn rwai¢' T l.1. ~ . . .+''1M brave a eurplY eM oemeM - M'fllllblf wmalpc prhNplO•pOMM .'1:.~ M bN mYpn Mchry -!rl lIM MNV NMrBNYOb raNN IIItlOnN. De. . y'mON MO Iw NUYfNOe Yupal In IM Mary maNr. lnl mN Id lllr- ^•,NpM nNWp Me nnNe erilkN epMnNOnI. On JuM ]O, If]), Ml lel Aw{Obl bpYlmNt N wan !N Ioxr•O[Mm{IN • ary•wbe lprlmml ,'•wlcrs) nb of if pwcml. In mY rN N M ary, M SOn fNMnw VMq, ' M rKOKI rrO If Hen IOww: e.< pY<mL 1 om Nob nM <wlra wou10 nro Nry w hone. rnvml Iml ILONY INNN mOrNY.. f[NT CON1nM OIfGOVBABfB INYtlTMf~ ' '` II rrYM pmN nO impoKe w IM OYnMIf{ le M {Nbep 40m upnN h. •~ rNlN hln[eme YOprrIY. mOM bYINYO wIII ONlG IINb mam/NOOxnry .+ Mp YN. willl Na. Omi1N pplerlllY b MNNN /MI. MN <NYN wN Fp. ,'~"o{aT IMlNwI Imo NwImON eenOYYepN, N • NM Irnln M nM maw 'r'bYM Yr+Ia nN N.«. •.'rc.`." ^' OOYN slYMiee. Mne el Rulpal UMrOielry'O Cfmr Ir Uroen Ielky ~. AOMYCn, Ide ! U. s. Sanm CrnmpMe"BY pNllrlp NI IM erulbn a nlw • r.MVyirp, you win Mo Iwmw nwNM pweNO, NlaMw IM cwIlnNKO a IrOM CpnUa.NUUOe clearly MOnwNrp NplpO wa NlwweO, MI MNN: .r:IANInY blxMCY o1 renl cNlyd h wn{I N wNl bcN perwmnOMf OM ' beNIYO. Mnl conlyd cmlowlN OyaMYNry q NN YaN GIYI nOCN ~. eHNO. 11N e:ry IMI Ime el milliNl N {eNwO M rsrrry heOe n NYMmI .. aN{bp{ wYO OMNanN !t ml NlorYrany NN N Ff.000 ! Na. GNxraf ~NN NNeIYIpN wnae Irom m{plnp nONNafNNI, ON M{ rNnN Oe• pNrIIN1O faMPNNnN[rlYlaplN, pYUYmrp,NcaN>Now Vah il] mFlbn eYlWlrybNminiNYlN reM pYlYa plppNl4 .. Mln{M rYJpf{Nran CenrN IYY/NNb NrI{IM bw YA nlepfrNO• MFplnp ppWp Mn emalpnl rYn NIaNKw VNYpmxNY, YM McNeelry, M f{fr we M NK nM eKOm{ Nclpllf N M {rlbm YMY rOM caYN, iMf Ye M OHO. xM ueulllY NM N IM MNr fuMnpl. AN, N 11 MN fYMq{. N IM NrpY oI eTwl - MI NN IfBfY moN OIIK, YN, NM MNMMr f- CIWNN In Nfw Yak, MMINN Bglff4 A IYIFIaf p{NmN INNI{nl M fpm{ mmry upa{NM { fIINfN9 pan xpkn Nl NNNK nwNw InewM. • rKOm Nwr e1 MO relOmlO InNNNy i NIVYNf rfOMNlb11 pbN In W{Nagbn, D.C.. NN rfnl <enYW wn {n{ N M w{Yf lBpplN M bw. YIf{Ina refYrl< flBlw M IMNbrp nfplnll{ M MMIp N1f NOw{ N b IN fll{ • fMmaN N M[Nf NpN {IIf MMN BIfI10nlr w M N OII<eYapN le pfnNN M 1{MN YMI NII{ {{MarMNnp, (Mpr ?fPr M OeY bN N Mf fIBM/ N IYbI rat U IunnY pNNMNN, ' YNMNKACYBIIt BBIIINBN Ner. MaNpO rNl ewlrot N rol . NNN{pgV felNlen le IM aoMlm, wp nnNl b NY{ eI1M Ino~bMf of pNpb wNf rf Nbf MI wI1N elMnnhf INI NIa1.Np, pYNCWaIy ruMY.ap plp NMdMalle pNN. Ne M nM. ~f{pB{{. aNaN r aeN/ en b.N hCM1, BI{N MNp warpM eMllleiab ...BONN N4'bNNI M OOM porYanenl~~eN Ini eWleug hOueby nl~e le : aN11NIN p1NMNyel10 pa'IM MIrVrNlrl ont OI IntlNNlp IM IVNN' a /1 wM.Ngl~bN nwNM. .. •.' ' ,. 11 b Illj.rbm Mt weIN leeemNbn tar maO~pl le]Yp MAN cenewcU.i .OIOrO b.bvNN Ml nlrrlOw N rmlN udle, IMn pT Imppebp rml wMrae wnkn welts Mbnehl/ HIM M bN Muunp !t pipna ceNl le Nln.'.. .,o- .3'' .. __ .. ^_ V - - l v S ~~ ~ f~ J ~_? V V C V V r y C C L V > y - T j ~ V V C °,_ V.=yam n V' O.O .~ C ~. _ Oi LLVy.n x r`~'>~~CCC .YCY"SE .. U~J°O°C YCC `Ln; C~ .Y.. _v~C~i~°-~T°L ~Yr VQr>~NUU .n ~Iy yVCJ'V~ C EF~•nu ~ Er~.°. v ^uuY oj~ ~~5 i_~ `_6Eu=y:c a _. LG C~~E =c r ^" o^o~~yF~.u~.E 2-^- ~G~a`-r50•t .6. E~ c ~ o=''v ~ ° ,. v ° c~ ~ w a S~ ~ EXE.?'y 3 e.~ X o,~ C i.~°+ c,=~ ..e E cs~=cr $~'~2~a~~r~~•o ^f~W ~ S~LLyic`" $ m~4{: o•Y•F ~.r_' 3 .U. 3'~'V A r Y.E w V v.C V V CL .-. GN O 6Y n nt~lL ~.~ A OL~ _ _ _ c'o ° o E - ° ~_ e Y ^ o a•p C c_.=vi G .~. ~ n ° b:Q ~-o-`L_ ~ c,_ :i ~ L._ •• M C'n V Y i Y ~ V ~7'L CL .~ V ° A V LC J `y ~ •' n i. _Y i L_ ~ ~ u~ n 1 n L i U O n `w > .` _ C O J Y r ~ C$ V _ O V Y` V V '. • ou~ec-o °~ ~E o'c~ a=T ~^ °- c~ey'~u"w aE~p en~E?, _ y G C V C~ OHO r u~~Y_503.ur O~y u=iy'..`.O C.C OOV~.CCVYC~ 3.Crt nc.. ,~ c c., En _c .. _., -'_y ro Ec~~-•E-_c L`•3'^-•^°. .'.9s"-n O'P. '~ a.C~G.'_GC C GyO'.a-.O mSrSY6o;y l.O>A~°~e OVE'C :oa.•Y' <:.~_ on ~°~soUn„6V ~5y~EEr ~ pE` i.. d_u r Y m'a 9 A~ y O ~,'' v r_ _. X n L L v 9 C ••• C •' L~ ~ Lr •C ~~ V$ ~ E r a. ° u n$ °-° Y o E c Y~ o c a E E E °'; Q.C °'a'~s== 3 A~ ^ an sL•s' o-., E Y~y~y`v c'E=n:LX ~'._.:e;rw YW `r ~3>'>n E.!•3 ~cn < -L,F..~F--..E b3E°_ $E'`., Cg'i'u ~:t-a;b Ew `c_.".~~w E~~°. _ T> >.u ~ g ~ e c ' ~': °' 3 u V .E O C~ 3 G 6 m°n Z _ E > N _ S ~p;yp- ° .~~ C w OLr0. • V 6 A L V i' ^ G ~° 6 E C s"e~x.~ < ~E< p _\ _ V n C ~ ~i 39~9 C o a.ro P~.'~ "' ~ExS~s"°335."oS•E~e.E8E~ ~ U~ yy Y•yy ~~ V N « V r0 ~ ~ naU4 ~ ~.C~ ~O ab4~ 4 ° °e C n h 5{ X ~ ~ 2 s ~ 9~•S'~ E~ a a ~ g ~~i '1L5~~~ ' O y Y Sx hh ~" y GA N~ 2'r~u ~03c° ~°•3~a ° b ~ ~ ~ $ •~ ~ ~ ~ie3 3 ~ ~i~ggt~ 5~pp aysp ° Q O O 0.0. ~ ro ^~6w'3°v.-~°=nZi O wCwb3Sa G . S ~ - V 1. <' t°Li _ -L ~ C ~ F -, i u0 ' CV ~ - •- _ - - .y O y ~ ~ ~ u Y 9 _S Y L i c'- 4 ~' -c cTCl - Jc pp c' g f tl G•C - c E r= T_ c. ~ 4 a= o .4 a s e c c .° ~ 8 5 E t , T Y c c - >+.v=~ .Y-mss o'v =,_•~43u o i ~ - i -~ C _ L 4 v q E 4 Cn ~ C C w. •C ~ p ~^ G I _ -I 8.="C ~m ~~`o := c.~ c~2'%5t'~a °SeF~ a '~~s ~ -~ ~ Sl ~ ~ o N Q ? ~ 4 ; ~ .. T O u ~ L A nL C~ u. G n t! 4 c% s'=._ c w.c' = E ~ ~ e E (s~ o.-. Y° c_ `)eC p4 ~. ..G^. E n ~ F S .3 <s v ~ ~ i .c, E %i~ c ~ u S~S nb-^~i ~Z ~$ ..'~ z ~ S~ gJ 9~ o - E - - umr. ~~ ~ _ 04`0 .~T.n'c ~ ~ 2~ ~,c qc >.. 4_ _ n '°CE c>4o E,e ni ~Y 4 ~ ~~ io ~0 8 .F.E R ~ L ~'~ 7 y Y L ~ V V 7 ~ ~ 3 C ~ E o 3 u ° c r. L o n '^ E E O b ~ c `o ~ i~ L E <a - '>cqq -o c nomc ~ mE.qq.o ~ Y Y >o .e `. ~„ O.FL U ~ C u n N C j i V~ O m° ~~ r S.^ 2 ~ S f~ S 4 ~ e f S O 0 4 > `i i'= G Ste: a ~^ E-°mce o`c e~ o`c E'^ e•OV 5'so ro`c°° 6~ ci.G,e_° °~ $o^nm+v_E°< °3p~E~`eE c.~E~~w a` '3'n3 ~ti' o> a 8 ^ y~ G wLy p'E n.~jC C •^ CZ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~~'J y~ ,GOB .9 n.Y bSiyy 3L i Cc C C.~.E3 G n u O S C~ C O u^ .~ G.G°p G h L Vl' VO 4 •O- m ° Y °E ^ 4 E c gc yE o y*•a~5~ ~ ~o ~ cr ~ ~ c n m4 ~ o ~~ Est ~= a yS~O„rc^s;V3x••~~m 5. o < ~4 .~eDe~l y3 o ;gEV~•v'.~a'z9..:cN°u'0.°7L •$e mi..o~~~i°. .~o,oE .o o~~~r L~Eo c ,c ~= '>. '~ ~' R c Es v t 'yam 0. ~ -~ ma•E e. " ° u Di a ^-,pv 3.~ .ta_u_ oon.a~ E ~o u E~ ua' n pp>c om nEo ~ V y '_' S y E C V ~~QQ(((( V L V G L ~ V Y r~ G O Y V 00 4 'Y C ~ V Q y= l A Q 's 9 v N' L -y~ S~ m 2[ 3. n y ~ 3 A~ O O. .. ; c .~3 oup~~ g'~3 oEE mmo,~y e35 es; p ye<or'~mo^ ~ ~ y U SCL OL w_T f'•n yE'V' V'C'OCV 'O ~~77 yO.G.~°O i~>4' VE.E P660.L C ~~~<.°_^~ m~3T~etun E•~ ggS~-O 3^n 4~cwu -Ec~ EEF " ~bo vv S'E Ceo v.. `°3.3s .T,t~c° ~o~ 5£: 5~~~$..4 ~'.°. ~°. c ~j 1 ~•wJ: ggTgg90~'n C~-~Ol'O 9~Or'~'OV ~_U ~.E `CUC ^i ~!~~~~..>.LZ~ o •E mC3~'3o~;Eymv^93E 4~ '~E43, o`"'~oCV4~T$5'E gy~3b~~~'.•~ >' •p a c' E v~ Y L~ y 4 `- s +l, ~'~ : 0 y~. ~ 9~~ •CJU ~' ; y~ y 9 Y _a ~• .£p n C E ~ ~ ^E O L' `4' 4 G L y T n ~ 3 p 1{~ ,~ V O G 4 0 •C C n ~ V S w L w ~ O '.1 p n V~ °'_• O ~'- rye ^ yyGG {{{p~~~ rJ {pp{~~ y~j G GGG ~>ya3 V,iI ~ ~ ~.- C u`. .~ V_NRQ QOVyC"B ~C61'~ ~'=>~O V3y{!GCy9 n3r;•p0 ~.~9 F s~•'C ^SU Ei Y C3.E~ C• ~~=.~ Gs 8'S ~ O V Q•J 4 ~ ~• .'7 •~ S. y O G e E T u CC... ~ d~~•SSS i`Y~ ov ^ o u= E 4'E e ~ ~0 uy~ y ~ va o~e ~ C > .5 $L,,, ~ „ .o ry C .`z o m j ~j y ~. S'- i" V y C O ~ r ~ yy^ ~ gc.~eLE i;3yti .di RE~ ~~~ae ~e 8'2 ~'~~o:SO..~.i o.,` a. ayv~-~ 29 e' Q~=Ee ~.~E.~.p3 °6a~j ~- • T .{ V P~ u - C > g.}j O ~ ~ V S >~ ~' sl'~ x. m C a 9 p' V ° < ' •6 ~ ~~S 3L .°.°u E. v L~`e 71 ~'~yf~$'3~~s9~~e1'fi~ ~Ex no.:n •~.~ p3 3•~QL E G_ ~$c~'`a.= 6skZ ~'~4 EF~7t ~_~~ ~ ~ i 0 C,'1~F3 ~ C$a b'e .n .~P3~u'. ~,~ `d c ,~-~ ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM March 17, 1981 T0: City Manager / City Council FROM; Jim Robinson, Assistant City Mana gerC,i~ SUBJECT: Chamber of Commerce Request for A fi rueworks' Stand - 1981 As you are aware, the City has received a request from the Chamber of Commerce to consider modifying the City's eligibility requirements to obtain a permit 'to operate a Fireworks Stand. Current Council policy was adopted by minute action March 21, 1979 (see attached minutes) and established the following policy: I. One fireworks stand per 10,000 population. 2. Accept staff's recommendation to establish a rotation system ~ for issuance of permits with qualifying organization being added to the list each year. In addition, to establish a random drawing to determine the order of priority for the original list. 3. A11 monies be turned back into the community. 4. Fifty-one percent of an organization's membership to be residents ' of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. Be a non-profit organization with certificate on file with the State and to present this as proof of organization's status. 6. Limit drawing of first applicants to the ones currently on file. ' The ones not drawn this year will be on the list first next y~r. All new applications be added to the bottom of list i .or-0er "of recefpt. Those having stands this year to be pla at the end of list. ~ In addition, the City adopted Ordinance No. 78 Tn lfay of 1979 which established regulations affecting the Storage, Use and Sale of Safe and Sane Fireworks. Should Council wish to consider expanding the eligf bility requirements to include the Chamber of Commerce, there are several companion issues that the City Council may or may not wish to tonsider: Continued..... ., March 77, 1981 Page Two Chamber of Commerce Request for Fireworks Stand 1. First of all, it would not be necessary to adopt a new Ordinance. Nothing in Ordinance No. 178 limits the number of stands permitted or prescribes eligibility requirements for qualified groups. Council would merely revise its policy by minute action. 2. Expanding the eligibility requirements to include the Chamber of Commerce in 1981 would be counter to the existing policy where qualified groups rotate from bottom to top. Our current list of "eligible" groups extends into 1984. Although there is no format commitment to any of these groups, it might raise thier ire if the Chamber is allowed to have a stand for 1981. 3. If Council commits to the Chamber, it might consider expanding the number of stands from five to six and consider the Chamber separately from the other service clubs and charitable groups. 4. Does the City Council wish to consider excluding single purpose groups, such as Boy Scouts, Sons of Italy, Nomen's Club, etc. and restrict stands to local service organizations. If Council wishes to honor the current group requests on file, a sunset clause could be established and begin with new eligibility requirements in 1985. 5. Consider the position that the Chamber of Commerce has other means of raising funds that are not available to charitable groups, service clubs, etc., and not expand the number of stands or eligibility requirements at this time. fi. Allow those groups who have permits for 1981 to sell in July and re-evaluate the existing policy at a later Qate after the Cfty Staff has received input, concerns, direction for review, etc. from the City Council. JR/vz ~ „w CLty Council Mlnu[ca Maros E1, 19]9 Page B NTSTOft ICAL Dougherty pointed tut the[ the enabling section mould apply OMINANCE co all app! SCa[iona under the ordinance. In certain c1i- cumacanrea Council might most co have a filing fee and tMt Ordinance Cowcil would have Me power to eat [em by a Meelutlon No. )0 once the ordinance vas established. (first reading) Moclon: Moved by Mikela, seconded Dy Palumbo to approve (conclnued) Ordinance Nm. )0 with change Sn Sec[SOn 18 (D) and (d), ae[ April 6 [mr aecmd reading, and wive melts reading. m[ion uwnimwly tattled. OgDINANCE N0. IO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TEE CIt4 OF RANCHO NCAMONGA, CALI£OpNIA, CRGTINC AN N15TORIC PRESERVATION CQWIES ION i0 Att IN ADVISORY CAPACITY i0 CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDElTIPIGTION AND PRESERVA- TION OP NISTORIGL Og1Ettg, EVEHiS, ST0.UCNRES AND i SITES AND M IDENTIFY PERSONS OP NIStORIGL RIGNI- PICANCE i0 THE CITT OP MNNO NCA1gINGA. COOPERATION A empen[fon agieCmin[ with San Barnardfm County Mi<A AGEF2IENT deals with publicly awned ham fog wise ml[Afng [ha C1ry OF CQgNNITY o[ poncho Cucamrya. Ph11 Rwh [rw the Office of Community DEYELOPYEM Devalapwnq San B[rna[dlnm Loun[y, addcuud Com<Sl. Cmwcil considered Mae she bane ES[a mould be m the ciq ' as opposed to doing chid eurselvea. Mr. Rush pointed out the cl ey had no Housing Auchod [y of fed awn atb only , an Nowing Aucnorlcy wa approved [o apply for thus ~~~ avalLble fwda. ' Itlkals expressed [hoe • great deal of efw most Snco eataDl Santng ens Chree adopted elements of the General Plan and can Foresee same qpe of effort going into the Naw Sng Etemvnt. Ne rte Led ve should develop ehfa issue before tuning Into a decision with cha Coan[y. ' Mo[fmn: loved by MSkels, seconded by Palumbo to diced iMa [o staff ro explore the kinds of alrornacivea [hoc are rvailable [o Mocha Cucamnga and sou a conaidaratiOn of tole Ices could be tncegxated loco conalderatlm of the Housing Element [or the General Plan. Motion unantmualy carried. CQ`MtT[EE 1. Advisory Committee - LTuck Bugw[, Cholrwn, For cha REP00.T5 Cucamnga SuDCOw1[[ea, ofd the Advtaory Ceuiltteea' vain ~ <wcern we atom dratna MSch mold Da reported on i later. Trey had Dem mrking on ens sign ordinance and more nw mrking an sus ocher stew vita seat!. Meattnge ere on third Thu radap ucA mn[h 1n the Library. 2. flistorlml Cewfuton - Leonard Corczyce Acting Cha lrman, stated thee t0 saver quutfons Mich were ~ being asked about of tee which have been newd of hletorical Importance, the next step vtll be [o take cheat sited and ea wbilah an inventory 1n a ardance with the prase Abed farm and eutltne Dy the Sca te. Then the list will be submteted to the City Councti Mo of 11 De final authority on deaf g- I naetnns. ~7 CFIRENnRg3 ~ L Jim Robinson, Mslatan[ to the Cicy Manageq presented the ft e[a report. Staff recommendat ton to Council wee: "Establish a rotation system [or issuance of permits. Quatlfied organlxat tone mold be added eo she !tae ewh year. In add(! Ian, the City Count ll could conatdee a ran- dom drav(ng or lottery to dete[mine the order of prtmrlty far this arlg L,al Its[. These qua if fled organlwtlo~s that rece(ve licenses each year wale rotate eo eha boe[om o[ the list and move up she Ib[ as I/<mau • e baud each year. Upon vrttten reques[,gw llffed organ txat Tana I ~- ~ mold be added to the Ilat ueh yeas." ~.,., , I FIRENORRg ~(con[Snued) r Those speaking on the isauevere: Gicy Csunc ll Minutes motes u, lBZs Page 9 Phil iubttlq Sons of Italy. emphasized this vas a n-profit etganlxacfon and should have a parr in the program. E.P. Cveaa, Cucamonga Mena Service Club, favored [he ro u[Son basis of aete<eion. Bill viel.nd-Vineyard Lft cle Lwgue, fawred the ro u[SOn basis of ael<ction. gill Griffith, wncho Cvcamnga gfvania, fn favor of the se.[f's recd®endatlons. Also suggested liml ring lrewrks benchs [o non-profit service ofganizationa that vuld corn moles generated Sn chla fund raising effort back into the <i cy for the b<tte[mene of the city. icon goecwlght - Boy Bcaut Scoop 643, fawred the gund- father cLoee and felt mre boo chs might be considered. chuck Buqueq Misa Softball America, expressed they weld be able co u any mneq in developing fields ain<e ch<re 1¢ a lack of fields in tow. ]ohs Raae, CS[tua LSt[le Laagve, [el[ stands should De 61ven on bu is of needs. Neat exptaaaed he mould like to sea any coney earned auy vi Min the cammwlcy. motion: Moved by Mikela, seconded bq Nast and unani- mualy rattled there should be ae [ollwa: 1. one [irewrka stand per 10,000 popula[SOn 1. AcceDC scoff's recommendation to aaubliah a - taclan system far faauance of perms cs of ch qu,lffy- fng arganizatiana being added to the liar each year. In addition, ce mtahlieh a [andom droving co determine [he older of prfo [Sty for the origlml list. ]. All monies be corned beck foie the community. 4. Fif ry-one percent of en acgenixaeion •s memberafi ip [o be tea lden[e of Rancho Cucamnge. 5. Be s non-proflc organisation vl ch cacti [SCa[e on [lie vich the State and co present this es proof of organization's etacuf. \ 6. Ltmtc droving o[ first app licante co the ones ~ eurcen tly on tile. The ones not draw [his gear v131 be on the list (t rat sex[ year. All n<v appl lea eiom be aAded to the boetam of 31st in order ' of re<eipc. Those having stands this year to be placed a[ [he end of Ifsc. STCp:f BRAN- Mc. Naapermnn stated [hat since [he lac[ Council meet inq. i SYBTNS Ff.E~ staff had me[ on hat o asfon¢ vlth the repreaen to clues of the Sndust rfal community vich the as atsta nee of the Chamber m( commerce heap Sng to coo rd tna to the effort. A meeting, vh ich v s bald this a(ce moan, vas for the purpose of SnJ Seating to the community the ascent of [land conccol problems to the city and rationale for e[aff and AAVisory Commtctee `s recommendations to Covnc It for the storm drain tee ord lnance. Mr. Nubby, Ctty Engineer, gave an cove rvt¢v o[ store drain neeJS (n the city vich some epproxima [e costa. Ren Ntllte. 0v tld(nq Asas<latton industry, indicated the BIA felt the ce vac an inJ mtlce vlth the Sya tams Bevelopmnt fees. He felt that 1[ moth • tee vets Imposed, Council should take into cnnafdeutlon: r ~+.. l ~~l~~~V li V~+(~I~~VI~V/1 MEMORANDUM T0: City Council FROM: Beverly Authelet The attached bonds were received Loo Late to be included on the printed agenda. They are to be considered as Consent Calendar item g. GTY OF RANCI-10 CUCAMONC.A STAFF REPORT DATE: March 18, 1981 "~~ T0: City Council and Ci [y Manager FROM: Lloyd Nubbs, Li ty Engineer SUBJECT: Consent Calendar, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion Parcel Map 4869 - located on the southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian ONNER: C/L, Inc. 521 No. Mountain Ave., Suite A Upland, California 91786 Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $45,000 The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans and it is recommended [ha[ [he Ci [y Council accept said improvements and authorize [he City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. Tract 9403 - located No r[h of Highland and East of Mayberry ONNE R: Olympus Pacific p ~ 2110 Ka [ella Avenue $ ~U, O Anaheim, California 92803 The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans and it is recommended [hat the City Council accept said improvements and authorize [he City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. l~spectfully sybmitted, (Bfl : b 1 c Attachments ~~ ~i March 1g, 1981 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONCA CITY COUNCIL MI:711TES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of [he City Council was held in Che Lion's Park Conmuni[y Center, 9161 Rase Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, March 18, 1981. The meeting vas called Co order by Mayoz Phillip D. Schlosser who led in the flag salute. Present: Councilmen James C. Fros c, Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palom6o, Arthur H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Also present: City Manager Luaren M. Wasserman, Assistant City Manager James Robinson, City Attorney Samuel trove, City Planner Barry Hogan, Community Services Director William Holley, and Finance Director Harry Empey. Absent: Community Development Director Jack Lam and City Engineer Lloyd Hubbs. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Yalombo, seconded by Frost to approve the minutes of March 4, 1981. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. An Executive Session will follow after [he ad,j ournment of the meeting. b. Staff requested Cha[ item 5-C be removed from the Agenda. "Request to consider a Resolution establishing elective boundaries." c. Councilman Mikels announced Chat last Saturday, March 14, both he and the City Manager me[ with Assemblyman Jim Cramer to discuss the financial pro- blems which would be encountered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga if we lost bail-out assistance from the State. He felt they were successful in getting Mr. Cramez to understand the city's positon. d. Mr. Wasserman briefed the Council on [he Aoard of Supervisors meeting which was held on Monday, March 16. He said the Supervisors were discussing the division of park bond money with the cities. He said that B1Y. of the cities in the County had to approve the formula for dividing the money. He said there was no agreement. He said the funds will be lost if they cannot agree. However, it is hoped chat this can 6e salvaged although at the moment it is dou6 cful since the State has received many differing reports. Councilman Bridge said it would be appropriate and beneficial to authorize the Cicy Manager the power to negotiate for the Council. He said one of the problems at the hearing was the city manager's did noc have this power. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Pa lombo [o authorize [he Ci[y Manager and or Mayor the power to negotiate for the City in trying to reach an agree- ment regarding Che division of park bond money so [he funds will no[ 6e losc entirely. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. e. Councilman Palomho said he had attended a meeting at which March Fong Eu presented a plan co be followed at National elections which would help elimin- ate the problem encountered this pas[ election when the polls in [he East closed and candidates conceded before Che polls in California were closed. i[ has been estlma ted [h a[ a great many did no[ vote because of this. Her suggesttion is for the polls to be open For a period of three hours on Monday anJ on Tuesday to close [he polls at 4:00 p.m. Ci tv Council Minutes March 18, 1981 Page 2 3. CONSENT CALEWAR. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 81-3-18 for $315,216.97. b. Request authorization to .omplece Sa L~ of CI[v land [o San Bernardiuo County Flood Control District for conseruction of Ueme ~s Channel. c. Acceptance of North Town Street and Drainage Improvements. Recommend Chat Council accept as complete the North Town Street and Drainage Improvements and au chorixe the City Engineer ro file the Notice of Comp leticn and re- lease Performance Honds. RESOLUTION N0. 81-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE NORTH TOWN STREET AND DRAINAGE II~ROVE- MENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. d. Quitclaim Deeds for abandonment of Easements for Chestnut Street. Recommend that Council approve [he abandonment of easements granted [o [he City by Victor Cherbak for Chestnut 8[reet. RESOLUTION N0. 81-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING AND EXECUTING A QUITCLAIM DEED. e. Request [o set fot public hearing on April 1, 1981 au appeal of Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 9441. f. Request to set for public hearing on April 1, 1981 Eor an appeal of Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 11609. g. Added item: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion. Parcel Nap 4869 located on [he southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian. Owner: C/L, Inc. Faithful Performance Bond (road) for $45,000. Tract 9403 located north of Highland and east of Mayberry. Owner: Olympus Pacific. Recommended that bonds be release and notices of completion be filed by the City Engineer. Motion: Moved 6y Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 4A. Item was delayed since public notices had been sent out stating the meeting would be at 7:30 p.m. Council concurred to go to the next item first. 4B. CODG ENFORCEMENT PROGRiVM. Staff report by Barry Hogan. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 139. ORDINANCE N0. 139 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TF{E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAp10NCA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A GENERAL PENALTY FOR WILLFUL FAILURE TO APPEAR AS INDICATED ON A CITATION ISSUED r'OR VIOLATIONB OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA. ~'a? a' City Council Nlnutes March 18, 1981 Page 3 Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by F'ros[ [o waive further re adinK. Moeion carried unanimously 5-0. ?layor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearinK. There beinK no response, [he public hearing was closed. Moeion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mike is to approve Ordinance No. 139., Motion carried by Che following vote: AYES: Prose, Mike ls, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Councilman Palombo stated that since the problems specifically require police power, ho felt the employees involved should have some type of informal training. SA. MOB IL F. ROME RENT REVIEW ?ir. Robinson turned the meeting over to Che attorney representing five of the mobile hone parks: Alta Laguna, A1[a Vista, Chapparel Heights, The Pines, and Ramona Villa. Nr. Steven b`hite, attorney, presented Council with petitions Erom residents of Che five parks totaling 474 signatures. He read the petition: "We, the undersigned residents of [he City of Rancho Cucamonga, residing in [he Mobile Home Park know as located aC where we rent spaces to acconmodate our mobile homes. Due [o continuing rent increases, which always seem to exceed the cost of living index and annual rate of inflation, we hereby petition the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enact an ordinance establishing a rent control or stabliliza- Cion board Co review oast, present, and future rent increases to determine iE they are justiEiab le, both to the owner and Co Che tenant, and if they are not justifiable Co take [he necessary steps to remedy [he situation. [Tliereas, we feel [he park owner is entitled [o realize a reasonable return from his investment, [here are instances where that return might 6e termed unreasonable, or excessive. This creates undue financial hardship on many of us who are living on fixed incomes [ha[ could cause some of us to seek County, State or Federal .lid. Relocation of our homes is not the answer as the relocation cost is financially insurmountable, costing from $2500 to $5000 depending on the size of our homes, distance of the move, etc." Ma}'or Schlosser asked [hat spokesmen for the residents speak now. (There were an estimate of approximately 250 park residents present). * flurry Cate, A1[a Laguna resident. He expressed there has been an increase of approximately 25"/. per year. * Mr, Glen Bray, Chapparel Heigh ['s resident. He said they were told that the last rate increase was because of the increase cost of utilities. He Ee LC the owners had a pro to c[ion with Proposition 13 since [heir taxes did not go up. * Mr. Verne Maxie, representative for Supervisor Cal MacElwain on the Senior Citizens Commission and employee of the Gas Company. He addressed [he issue of [he Senior citizen who was on fixed income. Councilman Frost asked Mr. Maxie if the County was taking a position in this since he said he represented Cal MacElwain. Mr. Maxie said no, he was a representative oC Mr. MacElwain's far the Senior Citizens Commission. The opinions expressed were his' own. _ * ltr. Sampson, A1[a Laguna resident. Addressed the issue of the widows and the hardship en them. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for eommanta from the Park Oanera and their representatives. ' ~. "1. '.c . sr Ci[v Council Minutes March 18, 1981 Page 4 * brunt Swanson, attorney representing the park owners. He emphasized that in order [e implement rent contrei procedures, the Council muse make the following findings: 1. There is a low vacancy factor 2. There are rapidly rising rents which is a cons iseenC pattern in the community, ant in just one or two parks. 3. Rn,ts rising are not attributable Co other normal economic factors, but axe actributab le to Che low vacancy factor. 4. There is substantial economic de trimen[ being done to the residents. * Howard Sunderland, owner of Chappa rel Heights. * Dale TACO, park manager of Alta Laguna. * William Semain, owner of Alta Vista. * Mrs. Carli Crowder, owner of Casa Valente. * Betty Yukech, manager of Casa Valente. * Vircil Payne, representing Mr. Williams, owner of Ramona Villa. * Jia. ::oski, 9580 Horseshoe Bar Road, Western Mobile Home Association. He presented ways which other cities and counties have used [o helm resolve the problem: a. Can give priority status to mobile home tenants [o receive Section B rent subsidy monies. b. Create proper zoning and encourage development of more moh ile home parks. (Sam Diego is a leader in this in Che State). c. Take redevelopment money assigned for affordable housing [o sub- sidize rents. (City of Garden Grove has done this). d. Counties get into equity partnership arrangements with mobile home owners and help subsidize rents by equity partnership arrangement. e. Block grants coming from federal government. Use these funds to develop programs for mobile home or apartment tenants. gfter allcwing time for rebuttals, Mayor Schlosser closed Che public oor tion of the meeting. Councilman Palo mho suggested that a rent review committee be established with re- presentatives from the park residents (8), representatives from the park owners (2), council rep resen[,rt fives (2), and representative from the Advisory Commission (1). Councilman Mikels suggested that Council continue this Ltem Eor two weeks in order to study [he various alCarna[i ve s. Councilman Bridge s[a ted he would rather rely upon staff Co search out [he alter- natives and come back [o Council far a decision. Ne felt it was Council's responsibility to Hoke these harder decisions without de legating it. Councilman Frost suggested a compromise -- that a council representative and cuff representative meet with one park owner and one park resident. _ a Motion: Ma ved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels [o continue the diacuulon to April • lr 1981 and to make a committee selection at that time. Motion Carried by the following vote: AYF,S: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, and Schlosser. 90ES: Palombo. ,',s.z 4 4. .A1 ' City Council Minutes March 18, 1981 Page 5 Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 9:25 p.m. Tl,e meeting reconvened a[ 9:55 p.m. with all members of the Council and staff present. 4C. REQUEST TO CONSIDER PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE OMNITRAMS ROUTES TO MEET SB-620 REpUIREMENTS. Staff report by Sim Robinson. Mr. Robinson reported on the staff's recommended changes for [he current level of service for Rouses 50 and 60. * Route 50. A1[a Loma - Cucamonga. Eliminate service up Hellman and Layton and on Base Line. Extend service on Foothill to include a portion of Baker and Arrow. Eliminate Sunday service. * Route 60, ChaEFev College. Retain the current route and currene 40 minute frequency of service. Staff would like more time to consider and evaluate appropriate hours of operation. * Dial-A-Ride. Retain existing level of service of one vehicle from 9a.m. to 5 p.m. seven days a week. * Direct staff [o periodically evaluate and report to the Council the ridership and Eare box return for Route 50, Route 60, and Dial-A-Ride. Mr. Bob Chaffin, General Manager of Omnitrans was present. He made a counter proposal with changes in the Route 50 in particular. Councilman Mikels stated [hat this was the third routing system which Omnitrans has proposed. He suggested that council adopt the route as proposed by staff to start with and in modify this later if we feel it is appropriate after studying the new proposal by Omnitrans. Motion: Moved by Mike ls, seconded by Palombo to approve staff's recommendation for route changes and to implement the services July 1, 1981. In the ireantime staff should evaluate the reconmended hours of operation and Omnitrans new pro- posal and bring back to the City Council any recommended changes. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 4D. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80-12 - BARMAKIAN. A request for a zone change Erom A-1- 5 (limited agriculture, 5 acre minimum lo[ size) [o R-1-20 (single family residential, 20,000 sq, ft. minimum lot size) for 24.36 acres of land located on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN 202-181-07. Staff report by Barry Hogan. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 140. ORDINANCE N0. 140 (firs[ reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. 202-181-07 FROM A-1-5 TO R-1-20 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ALMOND ROAD, EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading. Motion carried 5-0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, [he public hearing was closed, Mayor Schlosser set April 1 for second reading. #, .Fr.-' City Council Minutes March 18, 1981 Page 6 4E. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION. Designation of street tree plantings on Highland Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue as a historic landmark. Staff report by Bill Holley. Councilman Bridge asked what Caltrans would do when the street needed [o be widened. Mr. Holley said that Caltrans was at the meeting when the Historic Conunission held its public hearing. Their question was why would the Council want to save the trees. Mr. Holley said there were several alternatives: could put [he trees within a center median or perhaps they could divide a future high- way. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 141. ORDINANCE N0. 141 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNI2INC THE PALM AND EUCALYPTUS STREET PLANTINGS ON HIGHLAND AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY, AND THEREFORE, DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Palumbo to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Councilman Frost if this referred to trees on both the north and south. He said the palms do not go all the way to East Avenue. He felt there should 6e some type of refinement in the ordinance. Mr. Holley stated S[ was the intent to give the en[Sre section a special treat- ment and to recommend it cover any kind of tree in that area. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Schlosser set April 1, 1981 Eor second reading. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAPP REPORTS. SA. A REQUEST BY THE INLAND EMPIRE CULTURAL FOUNDATION. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. The Inland Empire Cultural Foundation had been retained by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors under contract io conduct an assessment of needs in the field of cultural arts and, from this, develop a county-wide comprehensive arts plan. This vas being done under a grant from the California Ar[s Council as par[ of its State/Local Partnership Program. Mr. Jim Hardestl, from [he Cultural Foundation was present to answer any questions of the Council. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo [o continue this in order to look into the request and the Resolution since they had not seen this prior to the meeting. Motion felled by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palumbo. NOES: Frost, Bridge, and Schlosser. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo to turn down the request and to [urn down any money from the grant. Mo [Son carried by [he following voce: AYES: Pa lombo, Bridge, Schlosser. NOES: Mikels, Frost. Councilman Frost staled he would support to turn dawn the req uesl of support, but felt if there were men ics coming, the city should have their ahaYe.. City Council Minutes March 18, 1981 Page 7 SB. REQUEST TO RECONSIDER REVERSIOY TO ACREAGE FOR TRACTS 9399 AND 9400 NORTH SIDE OF 6(uNYAN BETWEEN CARNELIAN AND BERYL. Staff report by Barry Hogan. Last year Ghe City Council took action Co revert to acreage Tracts 9399 and 9400 because the owners of the tract had allowed the improvement agreement and bond to Lapse on [he County approved tracts. However, a quirk in the Subdivision Mao Ac[ requires that the signature of [he property owner is necessary in order [o record a reversion map. The owner in [his case does not wish to sign. Mr. Jerry Wilson, engineer for the project, was present to answer any questions that Council might have. After some discussion, Council agreed [hat three months would be reasonable time for [he applicant [o secure his loans. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to hold off any action for a period of three months in order to see if bonds are reestablished and to remove the reversion iE the bands are submitted within three months which would be July 1. Motion carried by the following voce: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Frost. SC. REQUEST TO CONSIDER A RESOLllTION ESTABLISHING ELECTIVE BOUNDARIES Sta Ef had requested that item be removed from the Agenda. Drrnc••T (removed) ~~RE50'a =-Ie^N-er-. riS- ~ s~ooriC-i'-° RAtiCi10-Ci1CAM0N0A-EAi-F1MTRtFfh;~RB£NB-~gNS~fBEBkPI9M bP--REOiON-itA't71ER-~'f}AN-CODN£Y--BOIiNDA i°cS-N--E"'~rfm- s_r.cirrr. :D. REQUEST FOR A PRE-BUDGET STUDY SESSION. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. Staff was requesting a pre-budget study time with the Council. It was decided by Council to set aside Thursday, April 2, with April 9 as an alternative dace, pending confirmation from Councilman Bridge [he following day. The meeting would be held in the Lion's Park Community Center at 5:30 p.m. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. Mr. Crowe stated that he did not have anything to report. 7. AOJOURh'MENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels [o adjourn to an Executive Session to reconvene on March 23 at 7:00 p.m. for Che General Plan public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adS ourned a[ 11:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~ l ~LC4i L~.e e.r.,-~C~,. Beverly Au[helet Deputy Clty Clerk