HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/07/07 - Agenda PacketCity Council Agenda -2- July 7, 1982
` d. Replacement of Security for Tract 10277- 1- Barmakian. 8
Located on the north side of Almond Road east of
Carnelian.
e. Release of existing improvement agreement and acceptance
of new improvement agreement with letter of assignment
to secure passbook account improvement security for
Parcel Map 4735/S.A. 80 -09 at Banyan and Haven.
11
f. Acceptance of Carnelian realignment and street improvement 16
project 80 -01; authorization for city engineer to file a
Notice of completion; release of performance bonds; and
release of retention.
Performance Bond $238,312.90
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -112
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
CARNELIAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
g. Acceptance of subdivision extension agreement- Tract 9539 i/� 91
Brubaker, Davis, and Person: located on the west side of
• Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -113 22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
E %TENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR TRACT 9539.
h. Acceptance of Tract 10045 -1, Improvement Agreement, and / 26
Improvement Security - Westland Venture: located at the
northwest corner of Hidden Farm Road and Haven Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -114 28
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RAUCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGIfLE ?iE'NT A'ID INPROVEiIFNT SECURITY, AND FINAL NAP OF
TRACT h0. 10045 -1
i Recommend approval of agreement with Bank of America to act 38
as paying agent for bond redemption in conjunction with Assess-
ment District 82 -1. (Provisions only effective at bond sale).
j. Recommend approval of agreement with Cucamonga County Water 43
District for utility relocation in conjunction with Assessment
District 82 -1. (Provisions only effective at bond sale).
City Council Agenda -3- July 7, 1982
•
k. Authorize award of contract to construct miscellaneous 56
drainage structures at various locations in the city.
Lowest responsible bidder was Slater Construction Co, at
$36,890.00 - Locations at Hellman and 6th Street, Archibald,'''
and 4th, Amethyst and Highland and Sapphire and Banyan.
1. Authorization to seek bids for the reconstruction of Sapphire 59
Street from Rosebud Street to Vinmar Street.
M. Request City Council approval of an agreement with Conrock j 61
Company for the acquisition of right -of -way for 6th Street -
to be constructed under the proposed Assessment District 82 -1.
n Award of annual street sweeping contract to Inland Power 68
Sweeping at $2040 per month.
o. Release of Bonds 71
Tract 9262 and 9193 - located south of Baseline Road,
east of Vineyard. Owner: William Lyon Company.
Monumentation Bond (9262) $2,500
Monumentation Bond (9193) $1,950
is Parcel Mao 6725 - located at the southeast corner of Foothill
Blvd, and Haven. Owner: Daon Corp.
Monumentation Bond $1,700
Tract 9445 - located on the northeast corner of Archibald
and Banyan. Owner: Mark III.
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $507,000
C.U.P. 81 -15 - located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue
and Jersey Blvd. Owner: Larry Beck.
Certificate of Deposit (road) $3,330.49
D.R. 80 -09 - locat �d on Cottage Avenue between Bth Street and
Acacia Street. Owner: Or. L.V. Hofgaarden. Release of Retention.
p. Annual renewal of agreement for city -wide emergency street repair, 76
clean -up and supplementary maintenance contract. Laird Construction.
11
_010
City Council Agenda -4- July 7, 1982
q. Intent to vacate 22nd Street at Center Street and alleyway 81
between 22nd Street and 8th Street. Setting Public Hearing
Date of 8 -4 -82.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -115 85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
VACATE 22ND STREET AT CENTER STREET AND ALLEYWAY
BETWEEN 22ND STREET AND 8TH STREET.
r. Set public hearing date of July 21, 1982 for Zone Change
82 -01 and Environmental Assessment and Development Review -
82 -04 - Lewis.
s. Set public hearing date of July 21, 1982 for General Plan
Amendment 82 -OIB - City of Rancho Cucamonga. To amend the
circulation element of the general plan dealing with Highland
Avenue to Interstate 15.
86
t. Authorize award of contract for widening and reconstruction of
Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to the West City Limits.
Lowest responsible bidder was Fontana Paving at $75,690.50. -
u. 1982 -83 City Engineer's Report for Landscaping Maintenance .
District No. 1. Setting hearing to establish 1983 Assess-
ments for July 21, 1982,
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -116
A RESOLUTION OF THE rITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY
AND COLLECT ASSESSME ".TS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THL FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83; PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPING ANC LIGHTING ACT CF 1972; AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARINC OJBECTIONS THERETO.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -117
A RESOLUTION' OF THE CITY C=U' IL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCM•IONGA, CALIFORNIA -, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
OF CITY ENGINEER'S 1982 -83 REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. I
88
91
93
v. Award of design services for storm drain improvements within 94
Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue. i _ '"
' City Council Agenda -5- July 7, 1982
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -02 _ 103
TT 10826 - LESNEY. A change of zone from R -1- 20,000
Single Family residential - Iy acre lots) to R -2 /PD
(two family residential /planned development) and the
development Gf 27 single family units, 81 patio homes and
202 townhouse units on 57.7 acres of land located between
Haven Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, approximately 660'
south of Wilson - APN 201 -181- 12,13, 14, 02, 63, 65 and 69, 14 t
ORDINANCE NO. 179 (FIRST READING) i 145
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 201- 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63, 65 and 69, LOCATED
BETWEEN HAVEN AND HERMOSA AVENUES, APPROXIMATELY 660
FEET SOUTH OF WILSON, FROM R- 1- 20,000 TO R- 2 /P.D.
B. VACATION OF CERTAIN TRAIL EASEMENTS WITHIN TRACT 94401
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -118 ,
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF CERTAIN EQUESTRIAN EASEMENTS
WITHIN TRACT 9440, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA,
NORTH OF BANYAN, AS SHOWN ON MAP V -019 ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
C. VACATION OF UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE VICTORIA
PROJECT. It is recommended that this item be continued to
July 21, 1982
D. REVISION TO DRAINAGE FEE ORDINANCE FOR AREA OF ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 82 -1, Recommend first reading of Ordinance to
remove drainage fees within the area of Assessment District
82 -1 and rescind Ordinance No. 111 which established a Special
Drainage Impact Zone with the Assessment District Area,
ORDINANCE N0. 180 - -
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING RESCISSIONS AND AMENDMENTS
TO CERTAIN ORDINANCES RELATING TO DRAINAGE REGULATIONS
IN THE CITY.
0
146
161
165
166
City Council Agenda -6 - July 7, 1982
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
A. HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN. A proposed landscape design for the 167
Haven Avenue Medium. Staff report by Rick Gomez.
B. APPROVAL OF SALARY RESOLUTION NO. 82 -119. Staff Report by 175
Jim Robinson.
RESOLUTION 82 -119
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -97 -A RELATING TO SALARY RANGES
IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ESTABLISHING REVISED PAY
RANGES AND BENEFITS FOR ALL FULL TIME AND PART
TIME EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
7. COUNCIL BUSINESS
• B. ADJOURNMENT
0
176
'r
J
y%•`Il fITY
Cf;
nVCxO LV[ANl1ML1
xIRPI.9COHt
ll l P110N
6129162
•
�
PRx I
YFn
E .5 C L x M{ 11 E
P
J!1U n`
r11I+i c N
5[OU
II�Tf
PEAL
`If (
1 •'=rt
ttf'J
5.1'� E,: •.� cc,. r,(, UEV
/•=j
-
f115
LI!`-
5_/115 s I+T Vi\ .•'.I Yf♦
lire
f /:1 /: !
I:tl.;O
P e
I0053
7.51
F•al JAC.' s
( /"I /n•
•. .^
R :.' •;
A
'i3r'
IOn St
ICCSA
'ZIC
USIA ICunLal lfN "ALT
+IG r'Si;r
`PL +a11C.Y
f /':.. / „>
/\Y
51254.:3
51.•10
1�
I JOS,
1J054
IlI5
GGll
!C S{
L.. r. fC
'.0 (L, f'r f. i.LP k +PlOr
i11 ••
! /v]
L;f C / +r
J•r.NG
+\Vf?_
1'0eC
1.1]el
♦e .0
f8g5
11 1 seY lr:e
r.:LLE
t ft PE 11- ILF111 SV5
Lf VLpP'.i 011
L1.2
+./II / "!
11111,1
• '1.95
IrL 15.15
�4fj y.�
�, 1� "e3
♦1!v
oa lrr llr•. 129921:
H11 / +)
Yd.9]
19CN
CI s
aC 1IC4 IidYfl .P Gf ICI
h /1' /P]
119.]J
�t
mees
In:
is •.r' zn{4
ar n!4t
Je3.
114.
/Ijw
IJJl1
_
F'L.r +lTt Ot Yl vm:F UP
f /11 /O2
D'
lrL'•L41
I CC
$„I 1:11n PFr •1!!FFl
f /If /11
110.9'i
!
I=CS5
•
: :
S. A1 llYdnr f11Id Pr 111
0 /ll /n'
(.5J
IOC"
I,- ;
tf SC
i ,C: x' CvC In:',;.n Inp10v
1L1.1 CaIF IIUFY II. SSVIN4
WI .T11
h /If /rr:
0 /11 /nj
Z'i.00
2."1 LCC
e
10Clt
IJY )3
A .5
1410
f.0 IFCOATIC.Y
0/11/92
%Q
SI.13
1]0]4
Ia 15
5(0
lfl5
SL,114YPCCCY LIf HSXCC1S.
L[.S.LE r'F ULff �IIICS
1%il
! /21 /9l
121410.0E
B)..JO
IC.fO
if lC
St Cat if FCI SCN .!.
4121IV
451.02
IOOn
Is:9
e F e+Cio
!�
nlII/i2
s.e 1: is
r
IJJ ]t
IC ^ic
.3l
la.s
FN?
Oi25
P trr +L EIIPIPr'•:f SVS
S.i4 CIF4C G":VI Ni IOe C
l \ a, L, CF CAL/ CIIIFS
/21 111
UA /e2
L /za/P2
911]1.1!
]5U. Cr1
525.00
•+
•
10]al
,31{
Nr LdCXIAN Acr!x
612t 1a1
4). IS
Le 202
moa)
ns
SCe9
Iacsf, 3)P�5
V 5 .LStra$IfR
(1741 e2
0/251 a2
750.CC
1.501.10
t
Is3 ?9
r-q..l tl EI +F pxCl`Lila
! /nI /PZ
IIa.uC -
ISS(C
ICI
CICS
S:II IV LN pf Pf ^_LAf
9114 /W
223.5C-
j
155 {2
055{9
!<IC
VCIJ
S. Cat li CC S'!x LIl
F. P"S FI I L:, 4E N1
6 /Id /e2
!/29/ ^2
45'.02-
ISSS0
YC19
fSHS 1LICI4I&T
!1291x7
T
15551
Yrl to
s cl.=1.1
tf141ft>
15551
15554
CCCS
[C Cf
A�i 7.p x5f PIE$
R -1 IuPF I4'v l4dll UK $Il
6 /rife]
1/'4/69
2.)0 t.el
121.15
AN
1 55f
CZC1
CIS LCIYC SIPVICE
612']1.1
110.00
-
Lsst
OIV
iI Ea A1G Fnt tt
4 1 C 5a
t/zclx!
1/29121
119.25
55].59
11439
V!2
Viic, N PA 'L11.1;,&
Uf TS
<R9 /Br
14.45
e
ItssS
uc]
1IM
Fn PJ ^nPI
enI/ex
A.
p1
ISSeo
I55e1
1159
ee ua oPly ln:. zcucnL
]110-21 CCxv3111
6174 /v
!119162
F .eG
135!Ti
ISM
47
Blfv NS. OaV.
6/241 ^:
11 .21
Is 3 1530{
1
1.11
C,•' +F LU +9 FFR L!lA0JU51fR
!/13/1:7
151.5E
IS StS
2 ?25
CtIN IS SFp IIC Ilgx SVC
4129/NZ
150.0E
=
15540
FS Set
2)•'
21)4
CCC1 CClA 9C II l ILC CC
C''1 CCta 2011] IxG CC
6/19102
129 1F}
I10.V1
57.9,
I530d
0564
}15C
11 ?2
al F"an Cv,
C[•Y S[/+ FnID P41SIS
0/29/02
6129/91
19.50
52.50
O S]0
W,
6 VIb.tCY L C +IMF
! / ?V /!12
]199].25
155 /l
]'lt
li e;,f ........
14
4 /!G /'•2
250: C
15]1)
1
]: 5
CYCA."
0443 C XellF CISf
!I)S /!2
11]0{.55
2595
CV,n +.^nL. IP11111:.
6/2'1/91
195.10
11174
IsSA
2115
..; 4SSCCIVII
0/24/02
LI O.CC
2516
1`511
ZOfG
Ric
nllt. . lUC•
OS_IU PfY 1121
19/19
1129112
1215.0E
541.79
F411.$pOP1IT 10N
"I V,
11.212.4E
15519
259E
2ICC
2lLU
f.F ll(CF
CTSF'+T PACIFIC CPIXIEP
/
0 /29 /9I
z.lXn.00
15561
2'.:]
OIf ASCY CC IM1 C. R F
0119 /YI
t.45C.00
f
1359]
IS`9J
155;{
23C5
210E
)l2s
01IIRIICNE
Or.�'r fV lFa Til11ER CC
E E iM 1112 ^P IS[3
f/291PI
6 /2S 1X2
! /.4 /0Z
75.14
19C.01
05.10
,so
1f 595
13 rC
f55:CR p4flrl, PV CC
ASS[
0125/01
)4.Si
1.
I5581
YSO
EI: LU'•Pn .f !..,L. YppI
0129192
14340.U0
1
` J-7 CII, fi MniICIIU CUC{M.I'14J
G yle . y E N 0 C. N A M E
IGtYa G11t1
lt•9a 4Y'•
I'
II
V
V
:1
MM1MMnel MECRNCIIIIIII.1
nMR J� xNn`
I.M1IY M[ C IM1C(
e 12-11.$
DISCOUNT NET
1.]I
bl`L %G
11$.OU
It {q :C$
m
u
s
36.�6G.64
10.'l fl
i r Uv.l l
ee.o2 s.4s
Jn.)
1$SA4
UG.ao
i.40
e.sa
I5..o
iie: "ta
n.3$
s1.$.
"A'
:0.40
CU.00
ll.aa
n3.J7
051.41
3. NIA.
.a5[ $
l I
•
•
I
V
0
0
0 3
t6L2 Clll ff
46NCMp CXIMC41A
VXVAL r" CIL1.11CV
6/29/12
- .1. / llX V
V E M Y< A M 6 M E
VIrvR UP MI
DISLDD.Y NCi
Ulf A M.u! \CE
'
ISee� 13?5
VILLt4N5 RRIVI IM1Lr D
!1291.)
ML9B
- ISXe, 1Cle,
l'PLa ffP Pf P1tICX
!1:"1x)
9.9.�5
•
Lse na srvs
1,"5 VC I•!
Xe �'�V LC•PLIa IC
SERVES
fI1AL I�:1IIi
r "y1 u.:
)1v.te
i1XIL
111E.15 131,13a.a5
I
V
0
0
0 3
t NANEI51 Of ArRKANIIiI if115V �r »fir: _/
i.2;CItiCO iu 3 Josen f. lrrE(51 d NANSACTION(SI 5 jJ.JJ
�NIQG• -
r 8e::
OF - w..ypxt}i •�
t gER116R
. 0.pNINbiP0.7 III
•.. _.:'"i J;9 Circl3r! ►ve. fofAl
iJ4 `at.:mry <:u1vS :] T, Am hvNV.lndd! i•:
limn. ,,,ri:N•.I
♦ II rr.mn.anmvd. Akab.T.
""..I f:tmw sl Nib^ °"E,.. '• C ^7"" ..„ .;.NNda d .In' 'wy...m•r p..•
Me IAdI1.vM,1j#:..E
10. He�n W Cwr.el Atr NY
<m.kvd d ° I.N^E rau:n9 •t Ib�Kri�M � - --
tw,'QL(ML'N 1. Mm.Y•. mn a d:..9P6e
{"tmr 9 a 10 en en °nxN^°^. ^I" °A °MIl M dtt'n.d 9°N��Ifiaoten. tf A,mri °^d
• - 11.11, [.51an ° "TFS" wn.x�.md m1'dii: P°". w d M. Ak•beSt N.e.•N C•nn
nr ., ww ...,..
If. AE9l m b 9rll.��E °�
1 Cam.I °f :: w . •w.wY. M, w .rM�
IS S1Alf
ApplICATION
OF CAtIfOtN1A rn �.m. wnr. wu. r+` r'° .w.m•
.. u+r ..�"..rn+r �...rr'.r....• + ^. � � .w:.n.�r .�,.":!M.."..' •n...ry �"r...+ w. :.rr
•�pRICANi Nr•��'N'�� �.. <xi�.^...:t' '~.�- s•T_�
1• NGN NESE ,
07 70.r
ANSiER00.
5. "A,* IE
Of .....n -'r. ... .. war n...... n �..y.^.^ •_� :..... n.
MAnpgl..r. . 1 .r_ •.re.w+o- M� �. ".. . ...+. N^� � M nrn r w ` • M l:<e � Numberl.l
;m; ro. n:IN.Nn.tl rw MIT
nn Fnl R•.iv P.Inu' TA k L .:.
I t5 AffAITO ••:
.. •' Am<I+d ;', ua:a.e ^,.,a. ...,con
"n v
OF IICEN5E151
me NO.
COPY w I yan^
• ,RAW ffOSNfi(51
TM(s)
S,CnrC NO+
MNICIff10N EOa ♦ICONOIK 53'T.nw�
J=3 h +. J
OEUOSAANK t
.I Ak,,,- S..N.3°
JO1TOt +---
Oii $TL.
i. :.
COO,, ,
l
95513
°90f^°Iw
'. TM vMwW ^°d A.rtbY
dvnb.d..ldb.rt
Sv. T•O4
,SVrm O•re� —�
t NANEI51 Of ArRKANIIiI if115V �r »fir: _/
i.2;CItiCO iu 3 Josen f. lrrE(51 d NANSACTION(SI 5 jJ.JJ
�NIQG• -
r 8e::
OF - w..ypxt}i •�
t gER116R
. 0.pNINbiP0.7 III
•.. _.:'"i J;9 Circl3r! ►ve. fofAl
iJ4 `at.:mry <:u1vS :] T, Am hvNV.lndd! i•:
limn. ,,,ri:N•.I
♦ II rr.mn.anmvd. Akab.T.
""..I f:tmw sl Nib^ °"E,.. '• C ^7"" ..„ .;.NNda d .In' 'wy...m•r p..•
Me IAdI1.vM,1j#:..E
10. He�n W Cwr.el Atr NY
<m.kvd d ° I.N^E rau:n9 •t Ib�Kri�M � - --
tw,'QL(ML'N 1. Mm.Y•. mn a d:..9P6e
{"tmr 9 a 10 en en °nxN^°^. ^I" °A °MIl M dtt'n.d 9°N��Ifiaoten. tf A,mri °^d
• - 11.11, [.51an ° "TFS" wn.x�.md m1'dii: P°". w d M. Ak•beSt N.e.•N C•nn
nr ., ww ...,..
If. AE9l m b 9rll.��E °�
1 Cam.I °f :: w . •w.wY. M, w .rM�
IS S1Alf
ApplICATION
OF CAtIfOtN1A rn �.m. wnr. wu. r+` r'° .w.m•
.. u+r ..�"..rn+r �...rr'.r....• + ^. � � .w:.n.�r .�,.":!M.."..' •n...ry �"r...+ w. :.rr
•�pRICANi Nr•��'N'�� �.. <xi�.^...:t' '~.�- s•T_�
1• NGN NESE ,
07 70.r
ANSiER00.
5. "A,* IE
Of .....n -'r. ... .. war n...... n �..y.^.^ •_� :..... n.
MAnpgl..r. . 1 .r_ •.re.w+o- M� �. ".. . ...+. N^� � M nrn r w ` • M l:<e � Numberl.l
;m; ro. n:IN.Nn.tl rw MIT
nn Fnl R•.iv P.Inu' TA k L .:.
I t5 AffAITO ••:
.. •' Am<I+d ;', ua:a.e ^,.,a. ...,con
T. IS R. 7W. S.BB.aM. Rancho Cucamonga City
Tax Code Area
15011 ,15012
CLUB 02
11 Oal/
40 O
- ; 5
2.57AC.M /L
ROJ `
0
i 1 '
Pnr Lo/ s5 AYi6
J
Jl.
J5 4� 4C V11L
C .
� 33, 32 v I
�� 3e0AC.M /L r
' 1.371L. M/L
13
PCR SE, I/a 5E I/4
set; .0,. ^y��a
l3 2 92 AC. M/L
re
a2 AC.M /L
Assessor's Map
Note- Assessor's elk a Lot Book 207 Page 10
Nwnbirs Sbcvn in Cir:'es. Sc-: Ee^la.•dino Ccun!v
207 -10
' I
•_
RE a-F..0
3 10 75
3/Z4 /7B EJs
Al
I'LL- "'i
�-
- � �, �" � K-I -IZ - Ff �\ `i �:�% '�I � l � 1 JI � f � t Lf Ll� r' �� Z � '�" �•3-T
'LJlLI L
� J i
.. �`�i`'� �- /'7�'c��J•� `=-y. �Ii_�J . +`-- �1�_���1 -�.i -il RZ �i-
rf G - L
z C 7.-T R� C•Z -T R 3
A-1
-- -- R 3
i
a.. i
�:.
l I
fi '
A-I R -Z J GL R
4,
1
- •B�rL.IAr Y,, cr
APPLICATION FOR AICONOLIC REVERAGL LICENSEI$1
ia: Degnmem of AImAOf{ p<mage Conhal
" 111$0 51e1
., $apgmenio, CaLL 95Ble GLA EIDMLNMCFL
. ue.c c.nenOOf
Th. onde ..... 4 beaby opprm for c
I. TOLLS) Of UCENSE(S)
FILE NO a.Ar
FeR e
91T.$ Bid g L$ln
Applied under Sec 74044 ❑
ERe<q.e Dore: TAer,nn.
RECEIPT NO
96061_._ -_
GEOGRAPHICAL
TE15
Dor<
t NM E(A Of APPLICANTS)
temp Tell. B�, mG
,y
Vi , Ovre. ITIP, d
FEE HC.
TYPE
ii11i181HQ4 Is�HYHL
1 ITEM) OF TRANSACTIONS
$
4 Name el P,-- rL'11 '21
_nI e.,— el.aer_zo», .,d
f m.f yen n1 B.,meN_rvemb<r ,,,a $feN
. 9615 Yoothill Blvd.
-
cry era Lp cad. - De..Iy
WnenD CucmooBr91T30_.Bdtl�➢HO
,.
Tout
L
mPr Type eF L<em<
0. Mo�ln9 Add.[r. pl d.B<renr lrom $)_ NVmber end $IreN
!lrwr� rr nr
• 9. N re Fou It— bem mnr¢I'd of V W.." 10, Hore yoe reer ,,.bred P., el he P.er:uwf al rbe— ATCObelie
9ererage Comm' All ar 1.10.f.el aF Life Oepenmem per.
tainmq ro ILe An]
II. E.plam v "ItS" onv o.-9 or 10— ae mraebmenr .bi.b I'll be deemed pop M 0m appigm.ev.
q Appl'.[a +r ogres lal rbor oey m nvgv employed in role If- d Ih p.....I +dl M1e.e nll rbe wa iB[or om of v li<mtee, antl
IN � yr f< ..II r rolare_o___er perms rf_be riolorrA e.y of rFe pronfam n1 ape AIeoF[br Bever_oae Ce+rml Alr
I`II STAI[ Of CALIFOfNIA `<o.ny [1 smir ummu l0 D.0 -3042
W~.• b
I
� ....e�. .r .. „e... r w..•. r.eo. •en..u.- -.r e... a.. -. e.. r., e..r. �.a ., w ..r....a .• ... -n..e .e,,. r
III SIGN fRE 1A : \• r
- - _ - APPLICATION RT TRANSFEROR
- e�•�•I s, SIAIE of CANFO:NIA eo.nry ,1_5Ag BZIj kTfTj"O D^re
I-- lee :�..
Id +• -r or Le .•.•e • •.� +e n n• e•M 1] $gnolmrli fl G[• rc(rl I9 L[ _e NNm
19. La. -fay Number nod Sf..I Cry and Lp Code_ -- _ —Ca. -N
^615 __- .--- /-.••a -.-
On Vnr weir, a -LILT I Ale f.ln,: Por Ogn.errrml F're Onl9
Aov[bed S' PF<prdrd vpnee
Ld.. ory paper,, -
ot1 Aiii•<�l .. COPIES MAILED 6-)002 _ ..
1... f' re.e'r.a P..4 ..,...� om.. n.E
a
0
•
is
n1 xT nD U n ATr U n OTTO A ylnNnn
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: City Council and City h'snager
FR019: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
2 j �
a;
SUBJECT: Replacement of Security for Tract 10277 -1 - Barmakian - Located
on the north side of Almond Road east of Carnelian Street
Andrew Barmakian has submitted the attached letter of credit to replace the
bonds accepted by City Council for Tract 10277 -1 on April 7, 1982. This
letter of credit is in the same amount as previously accepted bonds and as
called for in the agreement between the City and Andy Barmakian.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council accept the letter of credit and
release the previously accepted bonds and authorizing the City Clerk to
return said bonds and attach the letter of credit to the previsouly accepted
agreement.
Respectfully submitttjd,
LBH:vK:bc
Attachments
o
0 (S�Ino
G lley
Nay 24, 1982 `Banit_
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
Gentlemen:
This will serve as notice and agreement that Chino Valley Bank
255 North Euclid Avenue, Ontario, California 91762, a financial
institution subject to regulations by the State or Federal Government,
shall hold on deposit the necessary amount of $46,000.00 pledging
these funds to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for faithful performance
and payment of Material and Labor for subdivision improvements as
outlined on attached construction and bond estimate on a project
in Rancho Cucamonga known as Tract #10277 -1 County of San Bernardino,
State of California, according to that agreement dated May 24, 1982
between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Andrew and Jana Barmakian.
The sun of Forty six thousand dollars and no one hundredths ($46,000.00)
will be disbursed upon authorization and directions u. , duly a- ithorized
representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
This agreement shall expire either upon disbursement of the $46,000.00
to the City of Rancho Cucamonga or upon completion and acceptance by
the City of Rancho Cucamonga of that portion of the aforementioned
work secured by this instrument.
Very [r y y dis,
Vincent enbecgeFF,
Executive Vice FresiQpnt
Senior loan Officer
This aµrccAnt apprcayTd^-.) �t
Andrew iia rmakian
BY:
.Jena ISarmakian
255 N. I'L.hd Onlanu, Cahfumu 91762 Te ghont: (7141 913 3994
�I
9 9 9
TENTATIVE TRACT N0.10277
�^c µ`[iv `..vu••rr...+r ..,.,
A
y •,.�q ` � � 'C `�p' � ,� Lei : p� U
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
• l DATE: July 7, 198-
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Dave Blevins, Public Works Inspector
GLCAI
�p ycv
C
UJ >
1977
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF NEW
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WITH LETTER OF ASSIGNMENT TO SECURE PASSBOOK
ACCOUNT IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 4735/S.A. 80 -09 AT
BANYAN AND HAVEN
Street improvements at the above location have been substantially completed
with the exception of sidewalks, parkway and median island landscaping, and
possible minor cleanup items.
The developer has on file with the City a passbook in the amount of $30,000
as security for the off -site improvements. The original improvement agreement
did not provide security for landscaping the parkways or the median island.
To avoid the necessity of holding occupancy on their new building as security
• for the above mentioned items, the developer is requesting that the City
Council accept those improvements substantially completed under the original
improvement agreement and authorize a new improvement agreement for the
uncompleted items listed above, with their passbook account remaining as
security for the new agreement.
REC IMENDATION:
It is reconnnended that the City Council authorize acceptance of the improve-
ments completed to date and accept the new improvement agreement and execute
same.
Resyectfully submitted,
LBHL3:bc
ALtachments
40
10 Pitch Meg Card
• 'Courier No. 6115
Margin - II - 96 6136
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVf:MENT AGREEMENT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made
and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal
Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of Cali-
fornia, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City,
by and between said City and The Southern California District of the Lutheran
Church- Missouri Synod
eretna ter re eFr_eFto as LFFeDeve oper.
HITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested
approval by the City of P.M. 4]35/ S.A. 80 -09 in accordance
with the piovi sions of t ee re�t the Communicy Development Director
thereon, and any amendments thereto. located at the northwest corner of
9anyan and Haven and
WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be
met cy said developer prior to granting the final approval of the
development; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of
improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City
Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said
requirements for the purpose of securing said approval.
:• NON, THEREPORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City
and the Developer as follows:
1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's
expense all improvements described on page 3 hereof within 1 year from
the date hereof.
0
2. The term of this agreement shall be One year
commencing on the date of execution hereof by the rty. T is agreement
shall be in default on the day following the last day of the term
stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. The Developer may request additional time in which to
complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than
four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of
circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of
such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions
hereof, including construction standards, cost cstimat_ and suf-
ficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments
thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein.
"--' 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the
Provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any
time to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and
thore•.ipon to rnc�ver from said Developer and /or his Surety the full
cost and a ^manse incurred in so doing.
S. Encroachment permits shall be obtained by the Developer
from the office of the City Engrncer prior to start of any work within
the public right -of -way, and the developer shall conduct such work in
full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Non - compliance
may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the
penalticr. provided.
ia.
6. Public right -of -way improvement work required shall be
constructed in conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard
Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments
thereto. Cens traction shall include any transitions and /or other
incidental work deemed ne.:essary for drainage or public safety.
7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently
Pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any
and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to
recover all coat and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his
contractor by any lawful means.
S. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement,
relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system
in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and the owner of the water system.
9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all
loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way resulting
from work done on the adjacent property or within said right -of -way.
10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as
directed by the Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer
to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject
to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said
improvement security shall be not less than the amount shown below:
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: PASS BOOK ACCT. 1 1480406667 •
Faithful Performance Bond 510,000.00
Material and Gabor Bond
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these
presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities
required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures:
J / DEVELOPER
BY: An �ji(/Jf� DATE: GI/ >✓
BY: /i / J/yµ DATE: {' /L I"
WITNESS: 7 �Y-- DATE: 6hil1 '
CITY OF RANCBO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
...._.. .._ -.., .�, a municipal corporation
BY:
DATE
N
13,
M:, C.
CITY CLE RR
•
•
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCIVIONGA
CONSTRUCTION AND BOND ESTIMATE
Date: June 10, 1982 Computed By: Dave Blevins
File Reference: P.M. 4735/S.A. 80 -09
CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING OF APPROVED $30,000.00
MEDIAN ISLAND, PARKWAY LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS,
AND REPAIR TO IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED DURING
CONSTRUCTION
Faithful Performance Bond (100 %) $30,000.00
Improvement Agreement ly
Page 3
E
ASSIGNMENT
The Southern California District of the Lutheran
Church - Mi 55ouri Svnotl herein called ASSIGNOR,
who doors ss is 5400 East Pomona Boulevard, Las Angeles. Ca. 90722
do (does) hereby assign and se< over to the Qt of Rancho Cuca ^dnca
hereinafter referred tons ASSIGNEE, all right, tit a an rote YC'St
of whatever nature, of assignor, in and to the insured account of
assignor in the First Interstate Bank
evidenced by a Pass Book
in the amount of ,G00 numbered 14SC -,A' ]
which is delivered to the assignee herewith. Assignor agrees c:at
this assignment carries with it the right in the insurance of the
account by the Federal Savings and 'Loan Insurance Corporation and
includes and gives the right to the assignee to redeem, collect,
and withdraw the full amount of such account at any time witEcut
notice to the assignor. Assignor agrees that this assignment is
given as security for SA 80- 09 /P.M. 4735 - construction and iandscaoire of
approved median island, parkway landscaping, sidewalks, and repair to inprcve-
ments damaged during construction.
and -hat the assignee may, wit out notice to ass agnor, re eem, col-
lect and withdraw the account for the purpose of paying for ary or
all items authorized by the said agreement
Assignor hereby notifies the above -named Savings and Loan Association
of this adsignmertt.
Dated this —/79 --day of OA
By
ASSIGNOR
RECEIPT OF NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT RECEIPT FOR C£RT1 ^:CAL' X:D
DIRECTION TO PAS EARNINGS
Receipt is hereby acknowledged
to the Assignee of written notice Receipt is acknowledged of the
of the assignment to said Assignee above assignment and the Certi-
of the account and Certificate £irate identified in the shove
identified above. We have noted assignment
in our records the Assignee's
interest in said aecoo nt as shown is hereby -
our orize. d directed
by the above assignment and have to pay any earnings or. the abovo-
retained a copy of this sheet. We identified account to the aba :e-
certify that we have received no named assignor until otherwise
notice of lien, encumbrance, hold, notified in writing by the
claim, or obligation of the above- assignee.
identified account prior to the
assignment to the Assignee. We
agree to make payment to the
Assignee upon request in accordance
with the savings and loan law
applicable to this association.
Dated this day of 1 Q
Na -u nd to of O:frcer
Dated this dad c`
Lg_
By
City Coginaer
E
EJ
•
IIIVII� Il T 1 \1111!1 11111 •1A111 A
The Carnelian Street and Drainage Improvement Project has been completed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that the Council
approve acceptance of the project and authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and release performance surety
and retention.
RECCMMEN9ATION:
Council accept as complete the Carnelian Street and Draiange Improvements and
pass the attached Resolution authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice
of Completion and release performance bonds and retention.
Respectfully submitted,
V H !?`_
LBH01P:be
Attachments
STAFF REPORT''
DATE:
July 7, 1982
Oil i
T0:
City Council and
City Manager
1977
FROM:
Lloyd B. Hubbs,
City Engineer
BY:
Monte Prescher,
Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Carnelian
Street Realignment and
Drainage
Improvements
The Carnelian Street and Drainage Improvement Project has been completed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that the Council
approve acceptance of the project and authorize the City Engineer to file a
Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and release performance surety
and retention.
RECCMMEN9ATION:
Council accept as complete the Carnelian Street and Draiange Improvements and
pass the attached Resolution authorizing the City Engineer to file the Notice
of Completion and release performance bonds and retention.
Respectfully submitted,
V H !?`_
LBH01P:be
Attachments
• RESOLUTION NO. 40' 112,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CARNELIAN
STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of street and drainaqe improvements
on Carnelian Avenue between San Bernardino Road and Vivero Street have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed,
certifying the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby
accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice
of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wasserman, City —Clerk
!0
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
i
RECC.0 rNc ?_- `GC_GTED OY:
CITY OF 1UNCRO CCCA-WCA
.. ., Post Office Box 307
Rancho Cuca.onga. California
91710
1411E1 RECORDED HAIL TO:
CITY CLERw
C.TY of Rl`1C110 CCCmnO;GA
Post office DON-907
Rancho Cucaron:_:a, California
917]0
•
'r
NOTICE OF CCNPtafrim
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVE$ THAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate
in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of whim-
interest or estate is: Carnelian Rveme between San li~dim Road
and Vivero Street.
2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is:
CITY OF RX:CHO CBCANOSGA, 9130 -C Baseline Road, Post Office Pon
207, Rancho Cocaronga, California 91770.
I. On the 21st day of Jun 1S 92, there was con -
plated on the hereinafter described real property the wore of io:-
provaaent sat forth in the contract documents for
- Carelian Street larprovemm ntf Protect HO -01"
1. The name of the original contractor for the wort of in-
proveeont as a whole was Sully - Miller Contracting Co,
S. The real oroporty referred to herein is situated i- the
Ca.- of Rancho Cueacwnga, County of San Bernardino, California,
an% is described As follows:
Street am Drainage taproveaents on Carnelian Rveme between San Semardim
Road and Vivero Street
Tre struct nddr,.s of said property iv N/A
PAT"a: 19
CITY OF Ri0IC:VJ CCCJiv::G\, a
suo :civil cn:;:o r.u:un, O:: mar
(Tiel•>)
' BOND Noy 81'08!0
n� _FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND PREmum 9'a�9:8.04
d words, 0N
for the K8 ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
efined THAT SULLY- RUILEB CU?ITflMING CUMPHY
as principal, and
lccessors SFABOARO SURETY COMPANY , as surety, are held and
istratior firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, in
of the the just and full amount of 3agg_3 Q,qo tn,,o a F
era! words '� l
vailing
ch craft payment whereof we hereby bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators,
as P �' y
app, 'ica ^' successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
sab-
utai d. Given under our hands and sealed with our seal this,�day of Se t, 19�_.
,rained.
of its The condition of the foregoing obligation is such that,
the
the laic WHERE,,S, the above -named principal is about to enter into a contract with the
ve
• City of Rancho Cucamonga whereby said principal agrees to construct Carnelian
Street Improvements, Project 80 -01, to include A.C. pavement and concrete
reroval, miscellaneous grading, A.C. pavement and concrete curb, gutter and
sidewalk construction, adjusting utility manholes to grade, extension to existing
bridge, construction of retaining wall, pavement striping, traffic control signs
and all related appurtenant work, as provided in said contract, which said contract
_ is hereby referred to and made a part hereof to the same extent as if the same
la
were herein specifically set forth;
110':1, THEREFORE, if the said principal shall well and truly do and perform all
things agroed by Whim in said contract to be done and performed, then this
` obligation is to be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect;
PR O'liD ED, that for value received the undersigned stipulate and agree that no
amend.,ent, change, extension of time, alteration or addition to said contract,
. or agreement, or of any feature or item or items of performance required therein
or thereunder shall in any manner affect the obligations of the undersigned under
this bond; and the surety does hereby waive notice of such amendment, limitation
19
of time for bringing action on this bond by the City, change, extension of
time, alteration or addition to said contract or agreement and of any feature
or time of performance required therein or thereunder.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES
On this. 3rd. day., ... ... SEPTEMBER 19 81 before me persona
J.H. CAITHAMER
.... ....... -.1-1 .... ..... . ...... .......
to me known to be an Attorney-in-Fact of SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY, the corporation d•
in the within instrument, and he acknowledged that he executed the within instrument as th
the said SE kDn S rTV rnIT ANY in accordance with authority duly conferred upon
said Cor.MI WV.,
I CHELE E. DRAKULIC
-/Ifk ('11. &U �� I At-
L, L
po"Au, X HRIS Notary Pub,
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Date
By
City Attorney
10
G-2
0
t
T
t[
Ca
cc
gu
to
col
Whi
ext
for
In,
for
1. vlj',
lj
J
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Improvement Extension Agreement - Tract 9539
Tract No. 9539 is a residential subdivision consisting of 18 lots located
on the west side of Sapphire between Banyan and Hillside. Due to prevailing
economic conditions, Brubaker, Davis, Person, developer, is requesting a
second extension of their agreement to construct offsite improvements. The
first one (1) year extension was approved by City Council on July 14, 1981.
The developer has submitted the attached subdivision improvement extension
agreement to request a 12 month extension. The Improvement Security Instrument
on file with theCity Clerk will remain at $174,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to sign the extension agreement.
Respectfully submitted,
LSH: :be
Attachments
aI -
• RESOLUTION NO. '9a -113
A RESOLUTION OF 1HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY FOR TRACT 9539
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement
executed on July 7, 1982 by Brubaker, Davis 8 Person, Partnership as
Developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to real
property specifically described therein, and qenerally located on the
east side of Sapphire between Hillside Road and Banyan Street; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in
said Improvement Extension Agreement and subject to the terms thereof,
is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property
referred to as Tract 9539; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient improvement security, which is
identified in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension
Agreement and said improvement security be and the same are hereby
approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement
Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City
Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST :
Lam'eo .1, {Jasserman, Li'ty Clerk
X11
Jon D. Ilikels, Flavor
I 1
U
9
BVIMAM, OAVIS 6 PERSON
3128 Virginia Ave.
West Covina, Calif. 91791
City of Pancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 793
Pancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730
Attn: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
Re: Tract 9539 - Libor and Material Bond 6
Faithful Performance Bond
]Dear Mr. Hubbs:
June 1, 1982
C!lY uF F, �fleiiJ CC ^_6!s', :"
Due to the prevailing economic conditions, we respectfully
request a one year extension on our Labor and Material and Faith-
ful Performance Bond agremnents, and hopefully this can he sched-
uled for and upcoming City council meeting prior to the expiration
of the current agreements.
Enclosed is a check to cover the extension fee, and if there
arc additional charges, please notify us.
Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter.
CD3: vc
y'Y
'q� (/
C
Yours truly,
Brubaker, Davis 6 Person
0
CITY OP RA \CI IO CI;CAJ10 \GA title'
` (4' } ENGINEERING DIVISION 1 �
-- y. - VICINITY NIAP
Inge
0
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT
EXTENSION AGREEMENT
TRACT NO. 9539
KNOW ALL HEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into,
in cnnfo mance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between the said City, herein-
after referred to as the City, and HidIBANER 1AVI5 AIN P£RSUi PARfHE_4Hlp
hereinafter referred to as the Subdivider.
MITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, said subdivider entered into a subdivision improvement agreement
with the City as a requisite to approval of the Final Map of Tract No. 9539 ; and
WHEREAS, said subdivider desires an extension of time to complete the terms of
the said subdivision improvement agreement:
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and I.i said subdivider as
follows:
1. The completion date of the terns f the said subdivision improvement agreement is
hereby !)tended for a period of li months tram the date of expiration of the
said agreement.
2. Increasn in improvement securities to reflect current improvement costs shall be
furnished by the developer with this agreement and shall be approved by the City
Attorney.
3. The required bond and the additional principal amounts thereof are sha+n
below.
4. All other terms and conditions of the said subdivision improvement agreement shall
remain the same.
As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of intent to comply
with same, the Subdivider has submitted the below described improvement security,
and has affixed his signature hereto:
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
Description: Additional Principal Amount: = E
Surety:
Address:
MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT BOND
Description: Additional Principal Amount: tp0tZZ
Surety:
Address:
Additional fnsh Ocpcsit
CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTING BOND
MAINTENANCE SURANTEE BOND NChR
To be posted prior to acceptance of the tract by the City.
prinnnil Amount:
CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONM DEVELOPER:
CALIFORNIA, a munrci Ual n
Corpara c ion
• I Ay, —
dUO-B. r4i Ae "s; Mr y�ir
nrresr:
Duron Mdis s -,, n, City CT-- k----
as
NOTE: Developer's signature gust be
notes ;M.
u
I-1
u
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Map, Bonds and Agreement for Tract Ho. 10045 -1,
Westland Venture Co.
The subject map, located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and
Hidden Farm Road is submitted by the Westland Venture Co.; it was tentatively
approved by Planning Commission on December 10, 1980 for the division of 18.78
acres into 26 lots.
An agreement and bonds have been submitted in the following amounts to
guarantee the installation of off -site improvements:
Faithful Performance $96,800.00
Labor and Material $48,400.00
Letters of approval have been received from Chaffey Union High School and
Alta Loma School Districts.
RECO- IMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing
the acceptance of bonds and agreement and the signature of said map.
Respectfully submitted,
BH:BK:bc
Attachments
a0
---ki
TEAIT
,47-11/,c* 70/irr ND /004
U7
U.'17Y C� 5�'v
1
�.r 7-1
Pqw"j
tI -- - -- ---- ---
. . ...... ... ....
A; S Z .... . . . .. ......
I L . --- ------ ----------
71`7
If
r.T
WP ..... ...
... ... ... I
• RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 10045 -1
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 10045 -1, consisting of
16 lots, submitted by Westland Venture, Subdivider, located on the north -
west corner of Hidden Farm Road and Haven Avenue has been submitted to
the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said
City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California,
and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said
City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered
the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution
by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security,
and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for
public use the streets delineated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
• 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same
is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute
same on behalf of said City Clerk is authorized to
attest thereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and
content thereof by the City Attorney; and
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon on
behalf of said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
• Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
ATTEST:
Laur -n M. Nasserman, CirClerk
Qq
y;lAi FELT JOINT iIMIOCJ' HIG1HI SCHOOL DISe III CT
OM Ill nfn, JT CLEr ON'Ir 10 Citl ICL ;114 I' ..
00000,«
1 COr Muraiir PEW O"[Pi DEPT,
- - - -_ - __ -- Of;,1.fNT DEPT.
JUV o9 1`82
AM
718191101"1L91112A415 6
Letter of Certification
of School District Capacity
With.,u the Chaffev Joint Union Hiah School District and the
Alta Loma H c.o'T9h �F oi—atcencar,ce boundaries for the
tollow�ng describe project:
Locaticn /Description: Tract 10045 -1
Haven Ave. 8 Hidden Farm Road
Number of Dwellings: 16
Anticipated Completion Date: 1984 -85 '
The school district hereby certifies that the capacity for
3 students will be provided within 24 months of the
cor ?let.ion of the above project. This certification is ai.,en
on the condition that the state of California continues to
fund the provisions of the Leroy G. Greene Lease /lurchaoe Act
of 1976, or any successor Act, in such manner that the State
Allocation Board nay fund all school buildi.na projects under
its cu ^rent rules and regulations without priority points.
The ccmmitment of this capacity shall expire 90 days from the
date of this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance
of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within that
90 -day period shall validate such commitment.
��cC�d4y1-
Supe andent Asst rrinte_ nsent
lA.wvV`
June 9, 1932
cc: Planning Dt,:ision
96 City of rancho Cucamonga
av
is.lbllshed 1005
RUM) 01 TRUSTEES
cnIII It S 1'R DST
1,11[6.RrM T.aVCtSI \N
MRS LI/. CALL MINI
MRS. SANDRA A. OERLY
JOHN C. BOOK
D-
01
Alta Loma School District
9350-F Baseline Road • Post 011ice Box 370 • Alta Lama. California 91701 • 714/987.0760
JOIIN E AIGIURTRY
Suprnntrndrnf
June 9, 1982 FLOYD %I STORK
Date l uvT n,P51ppon Servires
STAC)'NELSON
Buamrss Services
KIILLY STRAIN
Cumrulum /,penal prolrna
LETTER OF CERTIFICATION FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPACITY
For Residential Construction Within the Alta Loma School
District.
DEVELOPER Sam Ancona
TRACT NUMBER 10045 -1 LOCATION_Hidden Farm Road
NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS 16 single family
ANTICIPATED COMPLETION DATE
Gentlemen:
The Alta Loma School District hereby certifies that the
capacity for 9.6 students will be provided within
24 months of the completion of the above project. This
certification is given on the condition that the State of
California continues to fund the provisions of the
Leroy F. Greene Lease /Purchase Act of 1976, or any successor
Act, in such manner that the State Allocations Board may
fund all school building projects under its current rules
and regulations wtihout priority points. The commitment
of this capacity shall expire 9n days from the date of
this letter. Approval of the final map or the issuance
of building permits by the City of Rancho Cucamonga within
that 90 day period shall validate such commitment.
Sincerely,
Fzw,-A, e4R
Floyd M. Stork
Administrator
Pernonnel and Support Services
cc: Planning Division, City of Rancho Cucamonga
- jh
3e
•
C1
I
E
3 -:7 •5=05;6
..._.:_Up;: 517:2.00
FAITHFUL PERFOPMANCE BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State
of California, and Kin, 400 '^att
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") .av5 a entered into an agreement
whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated
public improvements, which said agreement, dated
198, and identified as project ,,.t. vl' ^ ->-1. \ ^e -. ='m "
of l I -:dden Sr—, is hereby referred tc aid made a part
ereo ^; ana,
WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and c ^- -v - -;v -, ^• - - -_^
as surety, are held and firmly
oath unto the C[ty of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City
in the penal sum of ninety -sir thousand eight hundred --------------
theu -- --- -- ------- ---- -- Dollars (5 ) aw Etr money o
the , w b states, Coe payment os w ess sum ex 1 and truly to be
made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executers and admini-
strators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and
well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions
in the said agreemenr and any alteration thereof made as therein
provided, on his or their part, to he kept and performed at the time
and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to
their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless
City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then
this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and
remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to
the
face amount specified therefor, there shall be inciided costs and
reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees,
incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligor Ion, all to
be
taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension
of tine, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to
the work to be performeC thereunder or the specif: acionn accompanying
the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and
it
'- • s hure Ly 'waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteratier
' "- - ^•• •-
•- •' -•
Or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the
specifications.
IN KIT "Ei5 WMEMP, this: in ^.irnmeat, has bran d ,' executed by
thu
=nn rr r'.+laa,rosr. Nam t(aapsu:a
r.nnn ur µlgibmo- ss 2\
&YEL'e
me
rnl l.rr
I
rMOlm
n,ll. ........ il , 1r.4 =nr
(.
L
Dion n
fall N Y sral O Sra Me
Ift 01
rl„n
'
,.1 ., 1r..r r..l r ,r�: .rr• a.l rig.
x
e0; i 4630a96 p
LABOR AND MATERIALMEN BON0
WHEREAS, the City COU Ra
oil of the City of ncho Cucamonga, State
of California, and Htnc Yf�� •.� G
(hereinafter design.retl'as principal") have entered Into agreement
whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated
public improvements, which said agreement, dated , 198_,
and identified as project �y . _ .
haven A Hidden Darn _, Is hereby referred to and made a part
an
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required
before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and
sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure
the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing With
Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State
of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate
surety, are held firmly bound onto the Cit) of Rancho Cucamonga and
all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and other
persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and
referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the som of
Eourty -eight thousand four hundred------------------------------
------------------------------ Do ars 14 48 , or materials
furnished or labor thereon of any kind, of for amounts due under the
,.,�„a,w,w• • -. -• Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such Work or lahor, that
said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amounc
hereinabove set farth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bone
will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable
expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by
City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and
fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the
judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipUla bed and agreed that this bond shall
inure to the benefit of any and ell persons, companies, and corporations
entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082)
of part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of
action to them or their assigns Is any suit brought upon this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this
obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and
remain in full force and effect.
Toe surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension
of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its
...... obligations on this bond, and it does hereby Waive notice of any such
change, extension, alteration or addition.
IN wITN.CGS 141"Mr, this instrument has been duly executed by the
principal and surety above named, me .JU^ ' , 1982.
VAr. L:G? ;;ISt 1r.* 'd:Tf `N :.w!: -, `:IA
i.,..•, 'i i-Fi 'vn.. II ,J
•; � rl
3A
•
Gothic No. 6126
12 - 96 6127
6128
6129
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
TRACT NO. 10045 -1
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into,
in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Nap Act of the State of Calif.,
and of the applicable ordinances of. the City of Rancbe Cucamonga, California, a
municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the
City, and u_.+r, le 10A TT,
hereinafter referred to as the Subdivider
NITRESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, said Subdivider desires to subdivide certain real property in said
City as shorn on the previously approved Tentative Map of Tract No. 10045 -1 ; and,
WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Subdivider
as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract by said City;
HOW,;TBEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Subdivider as folio.$:
I. The Subdivider hereby agrees to construct at Subdivider's expense all improvemen-
described on Page 5 hereof within twenty-four months from the date hereof.
2. This agreement shall run for a period of n ear from the date of the
resolution of the [ountil of said City app re ,ng said inal Nap and this
...•...+,,,,. .. ... ... ... .. agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the second
anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted
by said City as hereinafter provided.
3. The Subdivider may request an extension of time to Complete the terms hereof.
Such request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than
rout_ weeks before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement
of circumstances necessitating the extension of time, The City shall have the
right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction
standards• cost estimate, and improvement security, and to require adjustments
therein if any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof.
4. If the Subdivider fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this
agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions
to be at by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Subdivider and /or
his surety the full cost and expense incurred.
S. The Subdivider shall provide metered water service to each lot on said Tract in
accordance with the regulations, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County
Water District.
6. Utility - Deposit- Statement. Subdivider shall file with the City Engineer, prior
-.. ._ to the comnoncoment of any work to be performed within the areas described by
said map, a written statement signed by Subdivider, and each public utility
corporation Involved, to the effect that Subdivider has made the deposit
legally required by such public utility Corporation for the connection of any
and all public utilities to be supplied by such Corporation within such
subdi,i,ion.
7. The Subdivider shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of
any componmpr, of any irrigation the a water system in conflict with construction of
required r systemens to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of
such water system.
^r Z
r
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT NO.10045 -1 PAGE *
8. Improvements required to be constructed shalt conform to the Standard Drawings
and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvements Plan approved
by and on file in the office of the City Engineer, Said improvements are
tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated on page 5
hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The
Subdivider shall also be responsible for construction of any transitions or
other incidental work beyond the trace boundaries as needed for safety and
proper surface drainage.
9. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Subdivider from the office of the
City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be
observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or
other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and
City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shalt be subject to the
penalties provided therefor. -
10. The Subdivider shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other
debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said Tract resulting from
development work relative to said Tract.
]1. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion.
it. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Subdivider after
other improvement work. grading, and cleanup has been completed. Planting
shall be done as provided by ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram
approved by the City Comiunity Development Director in all locations where the
adjoining lot has been completely developed and built upon.
the Subdivider shall be re-
sponsib a or malnta aning a trees p anted n good health until the end of the
guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is
later.
13. The Subdivider is responsible for meeting all conditions established by the
City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City ordinances, and this agreement
for the Tract, and for the maintenance of all improvements constructed there-
under until the Tract is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no im-
provement security provided herewith shall be released before such acceptance
unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City.
14. This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee bond here-
inafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agree -ent
together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City
by a successor to the Subdivider herein named, and by resolution of the City
Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security
therefor has been released.
•
15. The improvements security to be furnished by the Subdivider with this agreement
Shall consist of the following, and shall be approved by the City Attorney:
A. A faithful performance guarantee bond assuring completion by the Sub-
. divider of all conditions prerequisite to acceptance of the Tract by the
City.
B. A material and labor payment guarantee bond assuring payment Jr. full by
the Subdivider for all materials, services, equipment rentals, and labor
furnished to the Subdivider in the course of meeting the conditions of
this agreement.
C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Subdivider to the
tract engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Tract
Map for the setting of all tract boundary, lot corner, and street center.
line monuments and for furnishfng centerline tie notes to the City. The
amount of the depos`t may be any amount certified by the tract engineer or
surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no value is sutmitted, the
cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond estimate contained
herein.
•
�.�a6kamo r 3`/
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT N0. 10045 -1 PAGE 4
As evidence of understae�ing the provisions contained herein. and of intent to
comply with same, the Subdivider has submitted the below described improvement
security, and has affixed his signature hereto:
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
Description: Principal Amount: $96.800.00
Surety: INDeMMiTy Co. OF (qt \G Jtx N1l�
Attorney -in -Fact: Antral/ SA411AGs�
Address:
MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT BOND
Description: Principal Amount: $48,400.00
Surety: IhiDEM N9 CU. OF CAi11F.RMLA
Attorney -in -Fact N AN SrN7 I c>
Address:
CASH DEPOSIT MONOMENTING BOND $ 2,000.00
Amount stipulated by tract engineer or surveyor:
• . --•m., x.— -• n- - -• Amount as shown on Construction and Bond Estimate:
• Amount deposited per Cash Receipt No. 1 6144 Date 6I2 IIQ Z
MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND
To be posted prior to acceptance of the tract by the City.
Principal Amount: $5,000.00
. ........................
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly
executed and acknowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set
forth opposite their signatures.
Date C.fZ11192 by .1�/ �)tu'.r Subdivider
Date by l Subdivider
... ............................... .....♦
•
' 37
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA >.OAGA, CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
by
Attest:
City Cam— er- rk
Date
City Attorney
•
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT TRACT NO 10045 -1 PAGE 3
Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as procedure permits after
receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of
_
payment in full from the tract engineer or surveyor.
D. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page
4 of this agreement.
-
16. The Subdivider warrants that the improvements described in this agreement shall
be free from defects in materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the
improvements found to be defective within one (1) year following the date on
which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced
by subdivider free of all charges to the City. The Subdivider shall furnish a
maintenance guarantee bond in a sum equal to five percent (5Z) of the con-
,
struction estimate of $200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful
performance of Subdivider's obligations as described in this paragraph. The
maintenance guarantee bonds shall also secure the faithful performance by the
Subdivider of any obligation of the Subdivider to do specified work with
respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district. Once the improvements
-
have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee bond has been accepted by the
City, the other improvement security described in this agreement may be released
provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Map Act
and any applicable City Ordinance.
17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain, during the tern of this agreement,
such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and
Any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from
claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work
or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself
or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed
by said persons. even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of
the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said
persons. The public liability and property damage insurance shall also
directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the
Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies
issued hereunder shall so state. The amounts of such insurance shall be as
follows:
A. Contractor's liability insurance providing bodily injury or death lia-
bility limits of not less than $300,000 for each person and 51,000,000 for
each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not
less than $100,000 for each accident or occurrence with an aggregate limit
of $200,000 for claims which may arise from the operations of the Developer
In the performance of the work herein provided.
U. Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used in the per-
'
formance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits it not
less than 5200,000 for each person and 5300,000 for each accident or
occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $50.000
for each accident or occurrence„ with an aggregate of not less than $100,000
which may arise from the operations of the Developer or his Contractor in
performing the work provided for herein.
.. .... .... _ ....... .... ........
18, That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the
City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance.
Each vrch certific3te shall bear an endorsement precluding the cancellations,
or re dur.ti on in coverage of any pol icy evidences by such certificate, before
the expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall have received notifica-
tion by registered mail from the insurance carrier.
•
t _ 3S
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA •
CONSTRUCTION AND 8040 ESTIMATE
ENCROACIWENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
(Attach to "Inspector's Copy ")
DATE: August 1981 PERMIT N0. CO:RUIED BY Madgle
File Reference Tract 10045 -1 Cib• DrauinS N.,_ 427
NOTE: Doc$ not include current fee for writing permit or pavenent replAce-
Rent depoal[a.
CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
tTE.N
QUANTTTY
I U141
CO
R.R00
Curh _
TOTAL CONSTEUCTIC': COSTS
t,
75
FAI ITINL PEA FOR`UNCE BONG (100.)
P.C.C. r" ,b T' C.L.
PAM
I L. F.
6 no
ls�filn on
P.C.C. Curb onlv A" C.F.
225
L.F.
S.50
1 217 In
A.C. Ran., (5200 man)
327
L. F.
4.50
1 471.50
4" F.C.C. Sidewalk
5175
S.F.
1.75
9.05 6 . 5
6" D[r Ve At r ach
S.F.
B" P.C.C. crnax Gutter
71
S.F.
2,50
4
Street Excavation
g00
C.Y.
3.00
2.700.C)
Im r[ed Embankment
C.4.
Pre ention of Suberade
S.F.
7
.c5
Aa
A.C.s r 1300 t
TON
A.C. (900 to 1300 tons)
I TO."
A.C. fi.odn, S 0
TON
500 tong)
49S
Toy
F.Ith A.C. trcnch
S.F.
1" Tick A.C. Merl v
710
s.F.
A41— M.Y.
A.
Adjust Sever C.O. to Grade
EA.
altuat nnInr «.Ire. to Grn4e
2
FA.
50.00
100.00
'1-1.1 1.1th,
F.A.
1 CO.0
13 0
51rne' Si S,
3
EA.
Sure[ Trees
CA.
Reflectors FQStS
A
5. " 0
105.00
tt rvc to re M =2'
EA
1 500.00
3.000-C)
.
Guard Panel wood
JO
L,
aw
.0
" AC Cutting Removal
L0
1.209.C'
Stop sign
EA
100.00
200.07
' 3 (�
•
CONSTRUCTION C05T
88,001.60
COIITINGENCY COSTS
R.R00
I6
TOTAL CONSTEUCTIC': COSTS
g6_ ➢01
75
FAI ITINL PEA FOR`UNCE BONG (100.)
96.800.00
LABOR AM MTERIAL BOAS (502)
48.400.00
ENCINFERING INSPECTtON FEE
4,431
00
(FEE SCIIEDULE)
Y.ONUNENTATION BOND (WH)
21000.00_
r 1
LJ
L J
•
i
STAFF REPORT�°`��"���
4
DATE: July 7, 1982
U:
T0: City Council and City Manager I9 %7
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: PAYING AGENCY AGREEMENT
Attached for Council approval and execution is the Agreement with Bank of
America to act as paying agent for bond redemptions for Assessment District 82 -1.
The agreement provides that for an annual fee of $100 plus several dollars per
bond the Bank will handle the records and payment of all bond redemptions.
These services will relieve the Finance Department of the burden of this admin-
istrative task.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council approve the agreement and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute on their behalf.
Respectfully submitt5d,
Attachments
38
13 BANKOFAMERICA
e':::,,: .A -E AuENCY DIVISION
June 4. 1982
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attention: Harry Emply
Treasurer
Sub; ect: City of Rancho C -Lcamonga
Dear Mr. Emply:
• In regard to Bank of America acting as Paying Agent for your new Bond
issue,enclosed is a copy of our Paying Agent Agreement.
•
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
n
L
('Its.) Mary Lee
Trust Administrator
jn
T,I: (213) 683 -4146
Enclosure
cc: :ioldman, Rolapp Assoc.
2061 Businc::o Center Dr.
Suite 203
Irvine, California 92715
Atta: Larry Rolapp
BA'.n ^F AMERICA NAhCtAI, TRUST ANO SA'IMGS ASS X AT'nq . 5:5 SOITI� FLT.'. �n ITMEFt . LOS ANr P. EC eat "'RN'A 9:^.71
-g q
PAY T N AGENCY AGREEMENT
THIS ACREMMT, made and entered into this day of 19 ,
between CITY OF NANClO CUCAMONGA hereinafter called "CITY" and BANG OF AsMRICA
NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, hereinafter
Called "BANK ".
W I T NE55E T H:
WHEREAS, CITY has authorised and may from time to time issue
principal modest of bonds designated and
wishes BANK to act as Agent to pay and register said Bonds.
CITY aay fr. time to time include other existing or (state bond issues
'" "'^'^'•" '" "' ° ""
` under the terns of this Agreement by notifying BANK in writing it wishes BUNT to act
•
as agent therefore.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows;
1. CITY hereby appoints BANK its Agent to pay and register bonds and coupons
refeered to above.
1, Cl IF will deposir with the principal office of BANK in San Francisco ac
lease five (5) days prior to the maturity date of bonds and coupons to be paid, or
otherwise by their race. become payable, funds far payment of the bonds and coupons.
9. BANK will cause all of said bonds and coupons pertaining thereto [a
be honored In accordance with 'halt terms upon presentation at maturity or when by
- •"
their terms they otherwise become payable t. BANK. BANK will hold and apply any
— ...,.... «�.�......_.
"• musics deposited with it solely for the payment of the bon,L and coupanx.
4. CIV will deliver to the RANK, At lease sixty (60) days prior to the
PaYmeot date of the first bands and rnupnns ,, be gold, the fallowing Aodumen[s.
Spdclmen bnnd(::) of ",I. lntemst rate
good .,1111 Lions)
Band I"sl .pw.n(s)
Debt Mice schedulu
•
Offtclal xIat.meat
S. CITY will pay to BANK fees when funds for maenrttlea are payable under*
Paragraph B of this Agreement, as follows:
Annual Administration fee $100.00
Payment of bands at maturity Or when
entire principal mount is called
for redemption 1.60 each
Payment of taupe. .15 each
Payment of bands prior to maturity by
'.idol all 1.60 each
Registration of bonds =.00 each
Payment .f interest oa registered bonds
•
by ch.'% .36 per check
Noce; The been fees include the destruction as '
ntprn to principal of .11 bonds and c.p.OS
paid. Postage and ast of pocket ezpenaes are
in addition to the above rates.
6. The foregoing schedule is subject to renegotlattoc should conditions
warrant.
: 7. B!'.T. will destroy all bonds and coupons paid and will sumb It mooch ly
stncuments of destruction reflecting the metres deposited dad the mouse paid, and
spe''fying the destroyed bonds by bond number and the destroyed coupons in bulk.
B. BANK will act be required to honor any request made by anyone other
than CRY to atop payment on any lost, destroyed, mu111aced, or stolen bearer bond Or
to pay any band or coupon the Ownership of which is disputed. Cln may instruct
((t
BANK what IO do in these circumstances, and hereby agrees to hold BART harmless from
any and all claims resulttag from acts of BANK In accordance with such instructions
• ..
upon request therefore by BANK.
9. BANK will submit its a,Oic.ent for fee. and expensea due BANK and CRY
wall pay said stntemenc In accordance with Paragraph 5 of this Agreement, Statements
'!
r`
for fees and expenses unpaid after ID days are subject to a service charge of :..
10. All notice., documents and other correspondence will be ..tied or
delivered to BANK at Bank of America, Corporate Agency Division, 555 South Flower
Street, Lo. Angeles, California 90071, and to City of Rancho Cucamonga at P. 0. Box
,r.a.•w.�..�.�.�'.....~ f... �..
807, Rancho Cucamon California 91)90, or to such other address as elther
ga, party
shall from time to time indicate in writion to the other.
11. CITY upon ninety (90) day.' written notice m BANK, mny terminab this
Agreemenl,
IZ. BANK upon ninely (90) JnYS' wSir,.. slice to CtT may torminace 1M.
Agreement, pr.vtd,d, h ... ver, that .,no Jufauit by CITY under any pinVL;fun of this
Ayrermcnt or upun Ld lure of CITY to dop.sit manic. with BANK for payment of bend, and
coupons which BANK has agreed to pay, BANK m,ry immedidtuly twrminit. this Agreement b�
giving written notice In CITY.
ql
�.,..
• THE TERNS AND CONDITIONS OF THU ASreonent are intended for the mutual
•
I
benefit of CITY and BANK eacluslvely, and art nat intended to give any third party
any right or claim, contractual or otherwise, hereunder.
IN NITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to be duly
eaec.11d, the day and year first aEOVe written.
Ticle
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST an
SAVINGS ASSOCIATION
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: UTILITY RELOCATION AGREEMENT
Attached for Council approval and execution is an agreement with the Cucamonga
County Water District in the amount of $29,500 to cover the cost of relocation
of water and sewer lines in conjunction with construction under Assessment
District 82 -1. The agreement describes the work covered under construction and
detailed item prices. provisions of the agreement only become effective upon
bond sale and District formation.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council approve "Agreement for Utility Relocations
in Conjunction with Assessment District 82 -1" and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:bc
Attachments
y3
Llovd B. Hubbs - �NCNG CI::A1:G::
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Assessment District 82 -1
Dear Lloyd:
• Enclosed are the three copies of the Agreement for Utility
Relocations in Conjunction with Assessment District 82 -1,
whi.:h we have signed. Please return a completely executed
Agreement for our files.
if -' have any furthor please call me.
Yours truly,
CUCA:;ONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
v � w
Llovd W. Michael
General Manager
j
e-tc lo;ures
•
yq
r
} ',[,�
\�^SSW',
FRANK K L
FESINSKY
3 «..mn. Gene.+l dlo.eyrr
• CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT
LLOYD W. MICHAEL
A,-,—
EALE R. ANDERSON
ROBERT NEUFELD
VICTOR A. CHERBAK, JR., P...
BEVERLY E. BRADEN
June 21, 19x2
Llovd B. Hubbs - �NCNG CI::A1:G::
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Assessment District 82 -1
Dear Lloyd:
• Enclosed are the three copies of the Agreement for Utility
Relocations in Conjunction with Assessment District 82 -1,
whi.:h we have signed. Please return a completely executed
Agreement for our files.
if -' have any furthor please call me.
Yours truly,
CUCA:;ONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
v � w
Llovd W. Michael
General Manager
j
e-tc lo;ures
•
yq
AGREEMENT FOR UTILITY RELOCATIONS
. IN CONJUNCTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1
This Agreement is made and entered into this 8th day of
June , 1982, by and between the Cucamonga County
Water District, a political subdivision (the DISTRICT) and the CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation (the CITY).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA has expressed its
intent to form an Assessment District 82 -1 for the improvement of
streets and storm drain facilities; and
WHEREAS, said construction conflicts with certain water and
sewer facilities under the Ownership of the DISTRICT; and
WHEREAS, said facilities will require modification and
• relocation within easements held previously by the DISTRICT prior
to said construction; and
WHEREAS, it has been found that said relocation cost shall
be born by the =,sessment district.
NO-1-7, THEREFORE, IT IS HLREH_ MUTUALLY AGREED BY THE PARTIES
HERETO, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT hereby agrees with
its own forces or through contract to relocate these facilities as
designated in Exhibit "A ".
2. That said work shall be accomplished in such a manner
as to not inhibit or delay construction of improvements planned for
installation as a part of CITY Assessment District 82 -1.
•
3. District shall indemnify the City, their officers, •
agents, and employees against and hold them free and harmless of and
from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection
with, or resulting from, acts of omissions on the part of DISTRICT, its
officers, agents, contractors, and employees in its operation in there
location of utilities herein described.
4. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA shall in exchange for work
i
described in Exhibit "A" Axgmx%mobD pay to the DISTRICT from the proceeds
of the bond sale in conjunction with Assessment District 82 -1 an amount
not to exceed twenty -nine thousand five - hundred dollard ($29,500) upon
satisfactory completion of said described work. Payment for said
works shall be divided as detailed in Exhibit "B" attached. Deletion
of any item detailed in Exhibit "A" shall result in a reduction of
payment in the amount specified for that item shown in Exhibit "B ". •
5. City shall indemnify the DISTRICT, their officers,
agents, and employees against and hold them free and harmless of and
fror.. all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection
with, or resulting from, acts of omissions on the part of CITY, its
officers, agents, contractors, and employees in its operations.
6. This Agreement can only be changed with the mutual
consent of both parties in the form of contract amendments.
7. This Agreement and the terms and conditions contained
herein are all subject to a successful confirmation of the assessments,
award of the construction contract and the sale of bonds.
IN WITNESS, the parties have executed this agreement as of
this day first above written.
7�
n
U
•
•
•
APPROVED AS TO FORM
ATTEST:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA
By:
Cucamonga County Water Di(strict
By: J.4 g( �n�%c.� A Yi
Victor A. Cherba , ji7.1, President
ATTEST:
�--
City clerk, City of ,tary to s and - Ll W. Michael
Aanc!:o Cucamonga Cucamonga Coun�f Water District
211
6.Y 15T. e WA I,,.
RELOCATE -, r ll. E
5EE DETAILL -I,
SEATICd h6l,.11
9o• THREL ,,,,��W
(4 KF4L', EL
EXHIBIT "A -1"
A
n ^ II
II
''��
II
II
it
�
I
o
~,
II
w II
U L
I " - ad
E %IsT. SERVICE METEK
II
I
II
N^
j
STA i9•&d
II
II
�
II
1
ezlsT. Cush } 4UTTEX
II
9
II
g
I II
� II
7.2'
y9 -
•
�J
RIrE (LEN(,THS NOTBO)
EXHIBIT "A -2"
it
III - I
EXIST. cu R6 {
GuTT
EXIST Io I.IATEti
•
II W
RELOCATE le WATERLINE
r1
,p•
5"(.E. OETAILETJ 5FGTIp1 MLCW
LIB Rcr
�1
L_
I 24' R.G.P.
EYIST. EPA
`
i
11 � jo R�,P.
JERSEY
+
BLVD.
�
Z
�/ 3G RG.P 1 ""/0'
II
LU
V
I
II Ts' Rye -
II3✓
z
11
EXIST. CORY
�GurrE,�
I
II
I1�
I
i
i
I
.fig
i
F
Q
F --
--
I
1'J'
STD, 5TEEL PIPE
I
_
I 4s lo" E.I -r°OWs
(LE r14TH5 As I`IOTEO)
I
r�.
(t ReouIREO) ...
'
-
-- rGfi1METGR Or
`
-' tA5T IH Pt-Aem
._:� NAr1NOL6
y 9 '
EXHIBIT "A-V
ci
Ih
•
27'00
-71,71,1111.11/1 -1.•/ 1
L A
Aav&n /a AiVlik2n
640 25-35 3 26,475
5/1
EXHIBIT "A-V
ci
Ih
•
27'00
-71,71,1111.11/1 -1.•/ 1
L A
Aav&n /a AiVlik2n
640 25-35 3 26,475
K]
EXHIBIT "A-4"
Lz"
7 7
it 1!
v z, 16"-2 a/
Ao f D 5
2� I
,P' aF
— �IISN 4Fn0E•
11EII
EX 15T. 0' 4ATE VALVE-,
' Z2''i 8� Eloou�
t2 RECUIREP)
.N
1
L
m0
•
P
d C
� 3
... 1 L
. ! 7 a' I 4g' e" F-US.W
(2 REHIRED)
s' STO STEEL PIPE .. .. •
—(LFi'1(jTPS AS 11 EO)
EXHIBIT "A
-5"
II
I
xo
II
II
LO' RCP II
to
I
EYIST, IZ' WATIC II
>
d
$
I
IL EX15T. Cultb
4C
F°1C4ATE 8' WAiERLINF
5 DETAILED 5EC7108 15ELOW
-
II
II
i rTHOMAS ST.
�DIST.
e'WAT6K
STA, 4.55
$
II
I
L
11
EXIST. CURS i fWTTEC
EXIST. GM.
II
I
II
II
— �IISN 4Fn0E•
11EII
EX 15T. 0' 4ATE VALVE-,
' Z2''i 8� Eloou�
t2 RECUIREP)
.N
1
L
m0
•
P
d C
� 3
... 1 L
. ! 7 a' I 4g' e" F-US.W
(2 REHIRED)
s' STO STEEL PIPE .. .. •
—(LFi'1(jTPS AS 11 EO)
• I 1 ie'
C) I
� o
J W
I j �I I J
fl.l� F�19T. 12' l- IATER.� V
44h �Q
a
it EXIST. Ix' WATM
L EXIST. CURL; WTTM
RELOCATE 12' WAT- FALIME
-SEE DETAILED SE'CTICTI BELGW
STA. 0. SS
ST
Bri15T. CURB }[ TTER I - - - - - --
— J—FII:ISH 4RAOs
EXIST. K' GATE
VALVE 1 ^�! 5.3
- FAMICATE 12 ELBOW
M FIELD.
_ (2 RFG U11lE0)
e
Cp
V
f 1
f1 ul
� r O
7.41 45' 12' ELBOI-I
(2 RE9UIhED) ,-
' 12' STD. STEEL FIFE ,�, -_. ..;
... LEd uTHS AS ItOTEOJ ,,, ..._..� •- ; - ... „ . ..... -.
..
EXH[6Pr "A_7"
LLS
W
\ \
r-
hull \ViLI'
z
= U
114"
Exlt7. E7-
Ex15T. EPA
G +r
5T.
w
°-
w EXIST. W WATER
KE$15T.
ZUN74
RELOCATE 10' WA7ERLIME
GUT7EP-
5re .^.ETA,I.ED 5EGTIoM
6ELCW
fA :ci_ TE 10 "EtPOW$
IM r;r✓'.
10� 910. ST` EL PIPE
(L[MTA tRCWM)
al
sy
.EY:ST. 10" GATE
VALVE
17,
CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT . 99n1 SAN 9ERNAROINO ROAD . CUCAMONGA. CALIF. 91930
EXHIBIT "B"
• REVISED COST ESTI.`1ATES
FOR WATER 6 SEWER
UTILITY RELOCATION WORK
1. stork per Sheet 25 of Assessment District Drawings
a. Relocate existing 16" waterline $14,400.00
(Lump Sum)
b. Relocate existing 8" sewerline $ 7;525.00
(Lump Sum)
Subtotal $21,925.00
2.
Relocate
water service
per drawing
#1 (lump sum)
$
550.00
3.
Relocate
water main per
drawing #2
(lump sum)
$
1,420.00
-, • 4.
Abandon
fire hydrants per drawing
#3 (lump sum)
$
480.00
5.
Abandon
fire hydrants per
drawing
#4 (lump sum)
$
135.00
6.
Relocate
water main per
drawing #5
(lump sum)
$
1,710.00
7.
Relocate
water main per
drawing #6
(lump sum)
$
1,830.00
S.
Relocate
'.water main :er
drawing 47
(lump sum)
$
1,400.00
-
Subtotal
$
7,525.00
TOTAL RELOCATION ESTI }LATE $29,500.00
55
L]
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Richard Cota, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Award of Contract for Minor Drainage Improvements
Sealed bids were received June 28, 1982, in the office of the City Clerk,
and were publicly opened and read at 2:00 P.M. Attached is a summary
tabulation of bid proposals received. The Engineering Staff has analyzed
the bids and finds them correct and acceptable.
These minor drainage improvements are for the following locations:
a. Hellman Avenue, south of 6th Street
b. Archibald Avenue, northeast corner of 4th Street
c. Amethyst Street at Highland Avenue
d. Sapphire Street at Banyan Street
The Engineering Staff recommends award to Slater Construction Company,
Incorporated as the lowest responsible bidder at $36,890.00. This bid is
8; below the Engineer's estimate of $40,000.00.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council award the contract to Slater Construction
Company, Incorporated and authorize execution of the contract at the contract
amount plus 10% for contingencies.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:R be
Attachments
-6'(0
LIIY OF MOM CIICNdRIW
SUMNRY OF PROPOSIL5 OPENED
PROTECT Min, Or.0.4e lw.Ioements DATE June 26, 1982
LOCATION va Woos COMPACT W.
r-
M
P. 0. Bov 605
5954 Etf...d. Ave.
Zld3 Par Nay nnve
11174 Plplllne Are.
P. U. Box 246
Y.IrI Eor'mn.ee th
oa
❑INS
OUANT IT I ES
Lid. 651286_
_N1r CA.9US
_[I 1100 a,. CA 9173?
P.oa_ 91766_
5l errn_ Ere_ L A;;
0rena Park, CAN''
Eti.4 nda�
CA_2, -_
BID ACCOUNT
BID RgUti
GIG lQNOIIT
AM Nmmlt
1110 Al,"1iT
mr,
Bidder's BOnd
_
1_ Clearing 6 Grubbing
_
1000.00
950.75
7455.00
)455.00
LvnP Sum
_
)00.00
700.00
_
-
1534.00
3000.00
9
iSW
_„
?00.00
£05445
-0054 00
2.
Pc[ 6v11 ed Curb G'BUtter
18 Li n.9t
e.00
144.00
JS.CO
610.00
10.00
180.00
5.00
90.00
9.OU�
162.00
20.00
160.00
16.)0
300.6L
-DC gu er Der
QLy ShnA. rtl 6302
3I Lin,
t.
6.00
296.00
28.00
1016.00
20.00
)40.00
6.50
240.50
9.50
35190
17.00
E29.00
9.RR
365.5L
._L.
rCC
Ltt,, r
80 5 . 1
.
I.W
80.00
12.50
1000.00
2.50
200.00
1 .75
110,00
2.25
220.00
2.50
100.00
2.20
Vfi. cG
(8055.00)
L
g
179 Tons
60.00
10140 .00
31.50
5636.50
45.00
8010.00
52.00
93011.00
59.00
10561.00
45_091
FO55.00
69.00
2351.60
6,
6" P.C.C. . Street R! tr
255 5 .
t.
2.00
450.00
3.55
)98.75
a.00
1000.00
4.15
918)5
).50
fE0.)
6.OG�
1350.00
S.)p
1282.50
A.C. Been per CI1Y
-50
1I
)._
Standard 1313
70 Lin.
t.
5.00
350.00
1.50
245.00
25.00
1750.00
10.00
700.00
9.00'
630.00
13.50
9:5.00
1. i0
I 2l� 0'
6' Diameter V.Y.C.
. 8.
5<N<yYl1 40 Oraln P e
182 LI..
I'
11.00
2002.00
8.00
1456.00
14 -W
250.00
20.00
1640.00
18.00' 32)6.00
3450
..59.00
10.)5
1956. Sa
18' R.C.P. Stern Drain,
--
--
,9.
C45B1BOnp
66 Lln,
t.
10.00
1980.00
35.00
2110.Po
P.Po
2ddI.Po
U
3fi10.Po
S6 A0
3596.00
5]_50
3> =5 00
59.59
192) C[
1d" R.C.P. Stem Drain.
1
_
.10.
Cl., -95
Lin.
1.
40.00
3800.00
74.50
)0)).50
42.00
3990.00
0
5)00.00
59.00
5505 40
59_00
`595.09
56. P,6
5401.7.:
24" 3 40' I W' prop
11._
Inlius-1
I each
)50.00
1500.00
1150.00
2300.00
1450.00
2900.00
0
j1251.00
1)S0.00
1ZOO.00i 24CD.00
2246.00
..00.00
1450.00
2900.0
Catch Basin 11 per City
- --
- -
.
.12..
Std.
I each
1200.00
1200.00
1200,00
12UO.W
1600.011
1600.00
1250.00
1200.001 1200.00
2350.90
a "350.09
`0)5_.00
20)5.0
Catch Basin 11 per City
1
1200.00
1000..70
_1J.
Citc 45 n
eaiM1
1)00.00
14n0.00
1400.00
1600.00
1600.00
1250.W
1100.00 1200.00
350 CC
1]50.00
2600 A.1
.
14
--
Std. 1502, ..10',rr•J'.
I h
1
1
1 00
1 0
2200.00
2200.00
2100.001
2LOp.00
1900.00 1900.00
2350.00
2360.10
_
2600.00 2600.6:
Cat as n per v Y
-
-
- ..__.
15.
Std. 0502, .-8', n3'
1 Nch
1500.00
1500.0
1500.00
1500.00
1900.00
1900.00
162100
1625 AC
1500.00 1500.00
21S[I4W
:350.00
2CISM 20)n AO
Catd Per y
-__
-.__
_ _
16_.
Std. 0504, .•8'. -3'
1 eaCM1
1800.00
180.0
ISOO_QD
ISOO.W
1900,00
1900.00
1625.00
1625.00
1500.00 15v0.00
2350.611
2_35 ^.CC
2600.00 2600.0.7
1
r-
M
CITY OF � CUCAIWA •
• SIMM0.3 OF BYEAED
PROJECT Nino, Orainage IMp,Oreahats GATE dune 28 19x2
00T10N COUTPACT M.
I
i
i
t i
3
slater Cens b [o.l nc
C.x. W'.. COnst.
United -M. Const. JA.S.
Teich I.,.
Siam, ,such
ri't" Chg. 32
JAVCO
It EMS
%IPMt1TIE5
810 )m
BID m:;uNi
UIO NWUii
anmrt
al0 ;:hvn
810 Wfnsa:
BIB
WpUMt
Bidder's Ooxa
Bandipn
-
`-
--
_ -
- --
- --
- -�
2060.CG
-- -- -
local Os per LI [y
17. Std, t51R. Class 8 f C
412 Su. t.
4.00
1648.00
6,SG
261R.00
1.5
IRS<.00
IJS
1952.00
I(A0.00
4G0
--
tvh,ro
5_00
18.
t0 finish 9 tle -
2 each
250.00
$00.00
2 75.00
550.00
2)5.0
350.00
400.00
x00.00
400.00
135.00
--
210 _OC
192.00
1Rd.00
19.
wgrad vaTres 'CO
finish grade
5 each
50.00
250.00
150.00
750.00
100.0
500.00
300.00
1500.00
F.2.50
SOC.n0
100_
_ 500.00
100.00
500.00
20,
Class 20000 0
165 Cif.
it
30.00
4950.00
31.00
5115.00
20.
3300.00
41,00
6165.00
}012.50
53.0
_P» 5.00
45.85
}565.25
36890.00
40318.}5
42964.00
46000.00
1 48149.50
56845 .O
9206.11
(43009.00
• corrected bid !Mounts
V
I
i
i
t i
3
I 1
U
9
OTmV nV n A A1nvn rr TO n TenTTO n
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
!� 7
u�
inr I
SUBJECT: Authorization to Seek Bids for the Reconstruction of Sapphire
Street from Rosebud Street to Vinmar Street
The reconstruction of the west side of Sapphire between Rosebud and Vinmar
has been approved by previous Council action as a viable Capital Improvement
Project. The design plans and specifications will be completed as of this
meeting. The engineers estimate of construction is $30,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Engineer to advertise
and seek bids for the reconstruction of Sapphire between Rosebud and Vinmar.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:h:�bc
sy
1
N=
E ,nn.van U°.
>r
11 to If•V "' S'r',
Vluv/rJ MAP
s '�a
54 55 c S6 h1 :ST 'tl 59 On r� wr e
J
•f w1 9.Jw .J /t5 9 /:f 91 ?r p °�q'H
•
y,
2l a t.
-
MSrI. /MF
C
F
!
is 34 3
18
i'bT
14
17:
O
^ O
is
/'��
- dENHEf� =
-�yl
--
.. STeEEi—
.. -'•n -� +.�
ws
X1411
u
APP�ox.'
PkarECT
Tt7
_
oF 'P,eo�eci
y
tr
6`l�
6 .'Q°
.uv._
] O
2'O
1
1
N=
E ,nn.van U°.
>r
11 to If•V "' S'r',
Vluv/rJ MAP
s '�a
54 55 c S6 h1 :ST 'tl 59 On r� wr e
J
•f w1 9.Jw .J /t5 9 /:f 91 ?r p °�q'H
MSrI. /MF
C
F
1
N=
E ,nn.van U°.
>r
11 to If•V "' S'r',
Vluv/rJ MAP
s '�a
54 55 c S6 h1 :ST 'tl 59 On r� wr e
J
•f w1 9.Jw .J /t5 9 /:f 91 ?r p °�q'H
0
•
L�
s
1.1 l l 1 t A 1T11L 1 11 A .1� 11 A
At the Council's next meeting on July 21, 1982, a public hearing is scheduled
to decide on the establishment of the Industrial Area Assessment District.
At the time of the hearing, it is desirable to have in our possession signed
Offers of Dedication for the property which may be purchased for a portion of
the right -of -way for the major street in the proposed assessment district.
This remaining Offer of Dedication will be forwarded to the City upon the
company's receipt of the attached agreement. Other property owners along the
route of the street have given us their Offers of Dedication with the under-
standing that the agreements will be executed after formation of the district.
The Conrock Co. prefers to have the agreement beforehand but it is the same
basic agreement that will be used for all properties. The agreement will be
null and void if the assessment district is not formed.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached agreement and
authorize the Mayor to sign it on behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
C,,�
LBH:PAR:bc
Attac"Tents
(0/
STAFF REPORT
+.
_' ,
�, .
GATE:
July
7, 1982
>�
T0:
City
Council and
City Manager
UFi ,
FROM:
Lloyd
B. Hobbs,
City Engineer
BY:
Paul
A. Rougeau,
Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT:
RIGHT
OF WAY PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 82 -1
At the Council's next meeting on July 21, 1982, a public hearing is scheduled
to decide on the establishment of the Industrial Area Assessment District.
At the time of the hearing, it is desirable to have in our possession signed
Offers of Dedication for the property which may be purchased for a portion of
the right -of -way for the major street in the proposed assessment district.
This remaining Offer of Dedication will be forwarded to the City upon the
company's receipt of the attached agreement. Other property owners along the
route of the street have given us their Offers of Dedication with the under-
standing that the agreements will be executed after formation of the district.
The Conrock Co. prefers to have the agreement beforehand but it is the same
basic agreement that will be used for all properties. The agreement will be
null and void if the assessment district is not formed.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached agreement and
authorize the Mayor to sign it on behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
C,,�
LBH:PAR:bc
Attac"Tents
(0/
0
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of
, 19_, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA (hereinafter referred to as the "CITY ") and
CONROCR CO., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to
as "OWNER -).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Council of the CITY is considering the
fcrmation of an assessment district under the terms and
provisions of the "Municipal Improvements Act of 1913 ", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, for the construction of certain public works of im-
provements, together with acquisition, which the public interest
_
and necessity requires. Said special assessment district is
.. ",'... -_- -.. .. -._._
.. _ known and designated as the RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
•
E2 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "DISTRICT "); and
WHEREAS, said public improvements are planned and located
in a manner which is compatible with the greatest public good
and the least private injury; and
WHEREAS, the OWNER and CITY are desirous at this time to
agree as to the terns of acquisition of the hereinafter described
property interests; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that CITY acquire possession of
the following described property before the proceedings for the
DISTRICT have been completed and the assessments confirmed and
"�,�,"....... -.. _.._,_.....,..-
monies are available to pay for the works of improvements; and
WHEREAS, CITY is prepared to institute condemnation pro-
'
ceedings in regard to the Easement Area and those two parcels
created by the Easement Area lying easterly and southerly of the
i.aeraec Lion of Buffalo Avenue and Sixth Avenue of epntox ime rely
.I6 and ,91 acres respectively, and to this end, CITY has obtained
a litigation guarantee from Title Insurance and Trust Company: and
I.j
?1F';
5 -
t'S.
00. -
0
WHEREAS, in view of the threat or imminence of condemnation
and the costs to both parties attendant thereto, the parties deem
it advisable to reach an agreement by which CITY will acquire the
Easement Area and the two parcels created by the Easement Area.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED BY THE PARTIES
HERETO, AS FOLLOWS:
AGREEMENT .
1. The OWNER hereby agrees to convey to the CITY and the CITY
agrees and needs to acquire, that certain parcel of property and
right -of -way situated in Ate County of San Bernardino, State of
California, as set forth and described in Exhibit "A ", attached
hereto, referenced and so incorporated.
2. That the purchase price for said easement and real
property is hereby agreed to be the sum of $211,157, said amount
payable upon receipt of money from sale of said assessment bonds.
It is hereby further acknowledged and approved that all costs of•
acquisition of said easement and real property under this Agreement
are to be spread over benefited properties in the ASSESSMENT DISTRICC
pursuant to the provisions of law. The CITY intends to convey the
.36 acre parcel and .41 acre parcel as described in Exhibit A herein.
to adjacent property owners. As a favor to the CITY, OWNER may
accomplish the conveyance through escrows 814322 -TN and 814323 TN
both dated February 22, 19820 with Title Insurance and Trust Company.
In such an event, the Purchase Price as set forth in Paragraph 2
herein, shall be reduced by an amount equal to the proceeds to OWNER
from the sale of said parcels. CITY agrees to promptly pay all of
OWNERS costs of escrow, including the cost of CL'IA title policies
as required.
3. This Agreement and the terms and conditions contained
herein are subject to a successful confirmation of the assessmen.
and award of the construction contract and the sale of bonds for
the DISTRICT. This Agreement shall be null and void if the assess-
ment proceedings are not confirmed within a one (1) year period
time after execution of this Agreement, and at that time, the Gr6
Deed previously delivered shall be returned to the property Owner
as said OWNER as shown on the latest equalized county assessment roll
-2- 63
0
!6.
a. Immediately upon execution of this Agreement the
OWNER and the CITY further agree that the CITY will record at no
cost to OWNER such Irrevocable Offers to Dedicate
S. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that
the oblication of CITY hereunder includes consideration to OWNER
for all compensible items for the property, including the value of
the part taken, improvements, if any, costs and any damages to
which OWNER may be entitled by law or otherwise. -_
6. The terms and conditions of tais Agreement shall run
to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto,
their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, legal
representatives and all other interested persons.
7. In the event the beneficiary under any trust deed
affecting the easement area demands, in writing, that compensation
being paid be applied to the existing loan, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga shall forward that compensation to the beneficiary for
application to the loan, with written notice to the undersigned.
I. Upon execution of this Agreement, Irrevocable Offer to
Dedicate, and Grant Deed, the Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate shall
be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. Upon tonfic-,atien
of the DISTRICT and the sale of bonds, CITY shall accept said Offer
by Resolution.
9. This Agreement and this offer shall become null and void
and be of no further force and effect if the property or rights -
of -way to be acquired, as described in this Agreement, are shown
upon any final map, filed with or submitted to the legislative
body for acceptance and approval under the terms and provisions
of the Subdivision Map Act and offered for dedication for public
use by said Map or be any separate offer of dedication theretofore
or thereafter made.
6y
-3-
EXHIBIT "A"
That portion of Lot 1 in Tract No. 2205, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map
recorded in Book 34, Page 64 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder
of said County described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence South
89' 40' 45" West along the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 53.19
feet to a point being on a curve concave Southwesterly having a radius
of 270.00 feet a radial line through said last mentioned point bears North
66' 14' 10" East; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central
angle of 22' 16' 59" an arc length of 105.01 feet to a tangent line; thence
North 46' 02' 49" West along said tangent line 54.81 feet to the intersection
with a curve concave Northwesterly having a radius of 580.00 feet a radial
line from said intersection bears North 43' 04.' 55" West; thence South-
westerly along said last mentioned curve through a central angle of
24' 15' 09" an arc length of 245.51 feet to a point in said South line of
Lot 1; thence South 89' 40' 45" West along said South line 899.03 feet;
thence North 00' 28' 55" West 60.00 feet; thence North 89' 40' 45" East
715.08 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northwesterly having
a radius of 490.00 feet: thence Northeasterly along said last mentioned •
curve through a central angle of 89' 31' 27" an arc length of 756.62 feet
to a tangent line; thence North 00' 09' 18" East along last mentioned tangent
line 232.97 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Easterly having
a radius of 610.00 feet; thence Northerly along said last mentioned curve
through a central angle of 25' 37' 32" an arc length of 272.82 feet to a
point in the East line of said Lit; thence South 00' 09' 18" West along said
East line 680.91 feet to a point on a curve concave Northwesterly having a
radius of 580.00 feet a radial line from said point bears North 71' 20' 11"
West; thence Southwesterly along last mentioned curve through a central angle
of 22' 19' 27" an arc length of 225.98 feet; thence South 46" 02' 49" East
54.81 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly having
a radius of 330.00 feet; thence Southeasterly along last mentioned curve
through a central angle of 21' 34' 55" an arc length of 124.30 feet to the
East line of said Lot; thence South 00' 09' 18" West along said East line 27.57
feet to the point of beginning.
•
&S
i
1 2I 1
r7Lx°os E I 971813 3 7 I - --
�� I_ 263.82' 2_IL2T111 $ BUFF4LO
7 �- iL3 232 97' '��� �t 75.76' 4VENUE—
eQi q i
• 249 � Od� �a�'
9 G0
AREA = 3.76Ac.
r
,n
1
1
r
i!U
o
2� $
n
m
m
'NILLOAN ASSOCIATES �E 1 " :2 0'; 2/75/; City Of
T`— \+ �:S dC "aP1rgLITV LY „iTE 110 .a;.o,n, r� pANCNO CUCAMONGA
tE:NAfl]bO, CA. 32409 I ASSESSMENT OISTRICt 1-3
(TIJ). 324.2141 oi. LA ,N�:aw 6IR2..
C U Q V E DATA
d R L T
I1 I~ d9 °37'17 ' . SSO.CO'' B'.fi37'i yt545'
I2 I J6° 72' o l' i 300.00' 247, 971 127.9]
31 71° 2B' 7J'! 6fO. CO�122.1T�61.26cTo'
�4'. 93° 17'.0”' 2G.00'
�5� 15* 11'57": 350.G0'1 9265'1 46.70'
" 20' 16'48"1 250.00' 8849' 44.71'
71 83' lT5O" 24.00' 34.88 2134'
81 730 23'52 610.00
'
14264'
7L65'
'91 E9 °3727' 490.00'
10 2S °37'32' 670.00'
75667
485.95'
212.82'
138.73'
EXH131T "A"
Tnat nnrtion of Lot I in Tract No. 2205, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
G inty of San 3ernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in 30ok 34,
Page 54 of 'laps in the office of the County Recorder of said County described
as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence South 99° 40' 45"
West along the South line of said Lot I a distance of 53.19 feet to the true
point of beginning of this description, said point being on a curve concave
South.esterly having a radius of 270.00 feet a radial line through said point
bears 7orth 660 14' 10" East; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a
central angle of 22' 16' 59" an arc length of 105.01 feet to a tangent line;
thence North 460 02' 49" Nest along said tangent line 54.91 feet to a point on a
curve concave Northwesterly having a radius of 580.00 feet a radial line fron
said last mentioned point bears "forth 430 04' 55" West; thence Southwesterly along
sai.i last mentioned curve through a central angle of 24" 15' 09° an arc lengtn
of 245.51 feet to said South line of Lot 1; thence North 99a 40' 45" East along
said South line 398.15 feet to the true point of beginning.
Containing .41 Acres.
67
•
•
9
•
J
n TMv nT n A w,n TTn nTTn A eXnXTn A
SUBJECT: Award of City Street Sweeping Services Contract
As authorized by City Council, bids were solicited and received for providing
City street sweeping services. The contract was advertised in the local
legal newspaper and mailed to three locally known, responsible contractors.
Bids have been reviewed and were found to be complete and submitted by
responsible contractors. The apparent low bid of $2,040.00 /monthly was
submitted by Inland Power Sweeping.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council accept all bid- submitted and award
the contract to the low bidder, Inland Power Sweeping.
Respectfully submitted,
C—
i
LSH:DL:bc
Attachments
!c 8
STAFF REPORT
r�
DATE:
July
7, 1982
C o
p
F U
EL
T0:
City
Council and City Manager
1971
FROM:
Lloyd
B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY:
Dave
Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor
SUBJECT: Award of City Street Sweeping Services Contract
As authorized by City Council, bids were solicited and received for providing
City street sweeping services. The contract was advertised in the local
legal newspaper and mailed to three locally known, responsible contractors.
Bids have been reviewed and were found to be complete and submitted by
responsible contractors. The apparent low bid of $2,040.00 /monthly was
submitted by Inland Power Sweeping.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council accept all bid- submitted and award
the contract to the low bidder, Inland Power Sweeping.
Respectfully submitted,
C—
i
LSH:DL:bc
Attachments
!c 8
CONTRACT SWEEPING SCHEDULE
EVERY TWO WEEKS
- Vineyard from Foothill to Hillside
- Beryl from 19th to Banyan
- Banyan from Carnelian to Beryl (north side only)
- Hellman from southerly City Limits to Hillside
- Archibald from 4th to Highland
- Hermosa from Church to Lemon
- Lemon from Hermosa to Haven
- San Bernardino Road from Vineyard to Archibald
- Base Line from westerly City Limits to Haven
- 6th Street from Hellman to Archibald (north side only)
- 4th Street from westerly City Limits to Cleveland (north side only)
EVERY FOUR WEEKS
- Arrow from Vineyard to Archibald
- Turner from 8th to Church
- Sapphire from 19th to Hillside
- Banyan from westerly City Limits to Carnelian
- Hillside from Turquoise to Carnelian
- Banyan from Beryl to Amethyst
- Archibald from Highland to northerly City Limits
• - Rochester from Foothill to Base Line
- Etiwanda from Whitram to Foothill
- Victoria from Etiwanda to East Avenue
a
0
T
0
CITY Of MOID CUCNUIIGA
SUIaARY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT CITY STREET SWEEPING SERVICE CONTRACT DATE
LOCATION
June 23, 1982
COBTRACT RO
no
Inla n0 ro�.nr
R F. Dickson
W -W Svicepin9
It L' "i
l',*,NTITIES
- i81De4 inn
Y410UfIT
DID NWUAT
_ __
010 NIOUIIT
BID AROUDT
OID N:OUhi
8[D
A'WUIIT
D iader's Baal
$2250.00
monthly car.tmct
$2040.00
$2694.11
hourly rate
$40.00
$48.00
$42.50
curb mile rate
$12.50
$11.90
$13.28
I
1
no
•
•
v nD n A \,nvn nr *n A %SnMn A
STAFF REPORT 2nDATE: July 7, 1982 a TO: City Council and City Manager u 1977
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Release of Bonds
Tracts 9262 & 9193 - Located south of Base Line Road and east of Vineyard
OWNER: The William Lyon Company
9613 Arrow Highway Suite K
Rancho Cucamonga, Ga. 91730
Monumentation Bond (9262) $2,500
Monumentation Bond (9193) $1,950
Certification from the project engineer indicates that all final monuments
have been set and that he has been paid in full.
Parcel Map 6725 - Located at the southeast corner of Foothill Blvd. and Haven
OWNER: Daon Corporation
P. 0, Box 1710
Newport Beach, Ca. 92626
Fonumentation Bond $1,700
Certification from the project engineer indicates that all final monuments
have been set and that he has been paid in full.
Tract 9445 - Located on the Northeast corner of Archibald and Banyan
OWNER: Mark III
2950 Red Hill Avenue
Costa Mesa, Ca. 92626
Faithful Performance Bond (Road) $507,000
The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved
plans and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements and
authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.
continued.,.
—71
City Council Staff Report
Release of Bonds
July 7, 1982
Page 2
C.U.P. 81 -15 - Located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Jersey Blvd.
OWNER: Larry Beck
8777 Haven Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Certificate of Deposit (Road) $3,330.49
The street improvements have been constructed in accordance with the approved
plans and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvement and
authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.
D. R. 80 -09 - Located on Cottage Avenue between 8th Street and Acacia Street
OWNER: Dr. L.V. Hofgaarden
711 W. Valley
Alhambra, Ca.
Retention
It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Engineer to file a •
Notice of Completion and authorize the release of the retention being held
by the City 35 days after Notice of Completion has been filed.
Respe /tfully submitted
/li/
LBH:bc
%a
•
A'
.L'C=9t::G ?l„ -_STED 31
CITY OF R3.YCHO CCGIM�GA
Post Office Boa 007
Rancho Cu.od eeya, California
91730
141=1 RECORDED MAIL TO
CITY CLERN
CITZ OP =X11O CCCMONCA
Post Office De 007
P.ancho Cccaponca, California
91710
NOTICE OF CO2IPLETI0N
NOTICE Is HEREBY G�vd`N. TWAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate
In the hereinafter described real property, the nature of wMc
interest or estate is:
Tract No. 9445
2. The full name and address of the undersigned Owner is:
CM OF RANCHO COC=ONG., 9320 -C Baseline Road, post Office 3me
907, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 7th day of duly 1982 , there was cc^-
ploted on the hereinafter described reel propert,, the work of ia-
pre:ereat set forth in the contract documents for
Off site Improvement for Tract 9445
4. The :one of the original contractor for the work of in-
prcvement as a whole was Nark III Hears
S. The real property referred to herein is situated in tha
City of Rancho Cucamonca, County of San Bernardino, California,
end is described as follows:
Tract No. 9445
The ctroot address of said pmp,rty is: NIA
19
CITY OF =:110) CCC :. : :O : :. ^,'.. a
aV:
(Ta ti 'I
-73
9
u
,'.C.MING n"-ST =D 3Y:
CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMIGA
Post Office Box 807 I
Rancho CuCamonga, California
91;30
FNLN RECORDED :TAIL T0:
CITY CLER%
CITY OF RANCHO C'.'CA.N@.GA
Past Office Dou-807
Rancho Cucamonca, California
91730
NOTICE OF CC.9PLET2OH
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVER THAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate
in the hereinafter described real Property, the nature of which
interest or estate is: Northeast corer of Hsvea Averse and Jersey Blvd.
2. Tie full new and address of the undersigned owner is
CITY OF RANCHO CUCANORGA, 9320 -C Baseline Road, Post Office Boa
807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 23ndday of June IBB2, there was cc--
plated on the hereinafter described real property the wor:< of im-
pcavemcn[ set forth in the contract documents for
C.U.P. 01- 15 /Pemit #805
#. The name of the Original contractor for the worse of in-
provenent as a whole was tarry Beck
S. The real property referred to heroin is situated is the
City Of Rancho Cucamonga, County of See Bernardino, California, `
and described escribed as follows:
B.U.P. 81.15 At the Northeast comer of Nsven Ave. L Jersey Blvd.
The �tra ^_t adiness of said property is: N/A
19
c.u0 ic:ge: c ^rpor 3ctun, Cvnur
7Y -
•
RcCC.'.DI::G FIIOCSTED By:
CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA,!0N=
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cocoaon9a, California
91730
huml RECORDED AVIL TO:
CITY CLERK
_
CITY of Wulc.to CUC,I?:oiGa
Post Office Bos•807
Rancho Curawnep, California
91730
tl
i -
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIUE1 THAT:
1. The undersigned is an owner- of an interest or ...ate
in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which
interest or estate ia: Cottage Avenue Between 8th Street and
Acacia Street
2. Tie full name and address of the un ataigasd owner is:
CITY OF R11:CH0 CUCXXONGA, 9320 -C Baseline Road, post Office Br::
907, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
3. On the 23rd day of June 1982, there ran re -
pletad on the hereinafter described real property the work of ir..-
provemant set forth in the contract documents for
Director Review 80.09
a. The nave of the original contractor for the n'or:< of ir,-
provement as a whole was Dr. L.V. Nofgaarden
S. The real property referred to herein is situated i the
City of Rancho Cucawnga, Count, of San Bernardino, California,
and is described as follows:
Street and Drainage improvements for D. R. 80 -09 on the easterly
side of Cottage Avenue free 8th Street south to Acacia Street
The street oddress of said property is: R/A
nATED: , 19 .
CITY OF tie W CCCANCNIA, n
mon1c".11 crrroraui.,n, O::ccr
%S
OY:
(Titlol
•
•
a
The subject contract, at the City's option, provides for renewal of the
agreement for the fiscal year 1982 -83 provided any cost adjustments do not
exceed the increase in the Consumer Price Index or increases resulting
from labor negotiations and the contractor has complied with the contract
in an acceptable manner. The contractor has requested renewal of the
agreement stipulating a 3% increase.
Staff feels the contract has been quite successful, the requested increase
is within the contract limitations, and the City wishes to renew the
agreement.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize renewal of the "Citywide
Emergency Street Repair, Clean -up and Supplementary Maintenance Annual
Contract" and execute agreement with Laird Construction Company, Inc. at
a 3 ". cost increase as is reflected in the adjusted unit prices and equipment
rental schedules for the various repairs and services.
Respectfully su6mitt �
LBH:MP:bc
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
duly 7, 1982,
�I
I
TO:
City Council and City Manager
_
1977
FROM:
Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY:
Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer
SUBJECT:
RENEWAL OF AGREEMENT FOR "CITYWIDE EMERGENCY STREET
REPAIR,
CLEAN -UP AND SUPPLEMENTARY MAINTENANCE ANNUAL CONTRACT"
LAIRD CONSTRUCTION Co., INC.
The subject contract, at the City's option, provides for renewal of the
agreement for the fiscal year 1982 -83 provided any cost adjustments do not
exceed the increase in the Consumer Price Index or increases resulting
from labor negotiations and the contractor has complied with the contract
in an acceptable manner. The contractor has requested renewal of the
agreement stipulating a 3% increase.
Staff feels the contract has been quite successful, the requested increase
is within the contract limitations, and the City wishes to renew the
agreement.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize renewal of the "Citywide
Emergency Street Repair, Clean -up and Supplementary Maintenance Annual
Contract" and execute agreement with Laird Construction Company, Inc. at
a 3 ". cost increase as is reflected in the adjusted unit prices and equipment
rental schedules for the various repairs and services.
Respectfully su6mitt �
LBH:MP:bc
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREE'•IENT, made and entered into this +1. F' 1 lg c /
_.:1 day of ra- L...�.:•�.�
by and nardin_n The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation, County of
San Serna rdi no,, State of California, hereinafter tailed the City, and
hereinafter called the Contractor.
NITNESSETH:
FIRST: That the Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City herein-
after set forth, hereby agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, and labor necessary
to perfor:; and complete, and to faithfully perform and complete, in a good and
workmanlike manner, the several items of work described hereinbefore in these
Contract Documents, all in accordance with the plans and specifications, Standard
Orao-rings of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Said plans and specifications, and
the proposal of the Contractor, which is also on file in the office of the city
Engineer of said City, are hereby referred to and made a part of this contract
in like :canner and with the same force and effect as if incorporated herein.
SECC'!D: That it is further agreed that said tools, equipment, and labor shall
be furnished and said work performed and completed within the time as required
or indicated by said plans and specifications, under the direction and to the
satisfaction of the said City Engineer, and the Contractor hereby expressly
agrees to meet, observe, perform and follow every term and requirement of said
Specifications.
TH1RD: That it is further agreed that in the event said Contractor fails to
furnish tools, equipment, or labor in the necessary quantity or quality, or
fails to prosecute the work or any part thereof contemplated by this contract
in a diligent and workmanlike manner, the City Engineer shall make verbal or
written de:riand upon the contractor. If said Contractor after receipt of demand
from the City Engineer so to do, fails to furnish tools, equipment or labor
in the necessary quantitiy or quality, and to prosecute said work and all parts
thereof in a dilignet and workmanlike manner, or after commencing so to do
within the time specified by the City Engineer fails to continue so to do,
within time specified, then the City may exclude the Contractor from the premises
or any portion thereof, and take possession of said premises or complete the
work contemplated by this contract or any portion of said work, either by
furnishing the tolls, equipment, labor or material necessary therefore, or by
letting the unfinished portion of said work, or the portion taken over by the
City to another Contractor, or by a combination of such methods. In any event,
Vic 7rocuring of the completion of said work, or the portion thereof taken over
by the City, shall be a charge against the Contractor, and may be deducted from
any ''on.ey du :� or becoming due him from the City, or the Contractor may be compelled
to pay the City the amount of said charge, or the portion thereof unsatisfied.
F -I
77
FOURTH: That the Contractor agrees to begin the work of construction contem-
plated and provided for in this contract within:
Emercencv Conditions: 2 (two) hours when specified as such by the City Engineer. •
Urcent Conditions: A8 hours when specified as such by the City Engineer.
tloroal Conditions: 10 days after receipt by contractor of written notification
by the City Engineer to proceed with work.
FIFTH: Time is declared to be of the essence of this contract, and should the
Contractor fail to complete the work required to be done hereunder, on or before
the time of completion herein stipulated, together with such additional time
as the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may grant said Contractor
for cause, it is mutually understood and agreed between the City and the Con-
tractor that the City may exclude the Contractor from the premises, or any
portion thereof, together with all materials and equipment thereon, and may
compelte the work contemplated by this contract in the manner provided in
paragraph "17MRO" hereof, and with like force aid effect as if the Contractor
had failed to prosecute the work in a diligent and workmanlike manner. It is
further mutually agreed, by and between the parties hereto, including the surety
or sureties on the bond attacht.d to this contract, that in the event additional
time is granted said Contractor within which the work required hereunder may be
completed, such extension or extensions shall not affect the validity of this
contract or r =lease said surety or sureties on the bonds given in connection
therewith.
SIXTH: That the Contractor agrees to save, keep and bear harmless the' City and
its officers and agents from all damages, costs or expenses in law or equity
that may at any time arise or be set up because of any infringement or alleged
infringement of the patent rights of any person, firm, or corporation in con- •
sequence of the use in or about said work of any article or material supplied
or installed under this contract, which article or material was fuenished by
the Contractor.
SEVEiITH: That it is further agreed that the City shall not be held liable or
responsible for any accident, loss or damage happening to the works referred
to in this contract prior to the Completion and acceptance of the same,
EIGHTH: The Notice Inviting Bids, the Instruction to Bidders, and the Proposal
are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement.
NINTH: That the City agrees, in consideration of the performance of this
contract, to pay to contractor as follows:
The Contractor shall submit to the Engineer Labor and material
Lien Releases and a written estimate of the total amount of
,work done. The City Engineer will review the estimate and lien
releases and approve it or notify the Contractor of any exception.
Tho Cityshall upon acceptance by the City Council and after
deducting all previous payments and all sums to be kept or
retained under the provisions of this contract, issue payment to
the Contractor. No such payment or estimate shall he required
to be made when in the judgement of Lhe Engineer the work is not
proceeding in accordance with provisions of the contract. No
such estimate or payment shall he construed to be an acceptance
of any defective work or improper materials. •
F -2
-79
The Contractor shall be paid the total contract price in
accordance with the payment processing of the City. It is
understood that any delay in the preparation approval and
1 payment of these demands will not constitute a breach of
contract on the City.
TENTH: It is further understood and agreed between the parties hereto as
follows:
1 1. That the quantities are unknown and that all of the work contemplated
by this contract must be completed in all respects in accordance with
the plans and specifications hereinbefore mentioned, whether the
j quantities of materials required or the work and labor to be preformed
I are greater or less than anticipated.
j 2. That the Contractor shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or other-
] wise dispose of this contract, or of his right, title, or interest in or
to the same ;r any part thereof, without the previous consent in writing
of the City .;ouncil. If the Contractor shall, without such previous
written consent, assign, transfer, convey, submlet or otherwise dispose
of this cr, „itract, or of his right, title or interest therein, or lose
or be deprived of the same by operation of the bankruptcy laws or
insolvency laws, or in any other manner whatsoever, then and in any
such event this contract may be revoked and annulled by the City Council
at their option and in their absolute discretion, and if so revoked or
annulled, the City shall thereupon be relieved and discharged from any
and all liabilities and obligations arising out of the sane to the
Contractor and /or his assignee, trustee or transferee: and no right shall
be acouired by any such assignee, trustee or transferee, or any one claiming
under them or any of them, either at law or in equity, to make or assert
any claim or demand whatever against the City, whether for monies due or
to become due under this contract, or otherwise whosoever.
3. That the words "City Council” "Engineer ", or "City Engineer ", and
"Gontrector% when used in this contract. and /or the bonds aecomnanyinq
i the sage, have the same meaning as when said words, or any of them, are
usdd in the plans and specifications for the work herein mentioned and
described, as said words are defined in said specifications.
4. That this contract shall be binding upon the City, its successors or
assigns, and upon the Contractor, his executors, administrators, successors
or A.ssi;ns.
EL; :7 C,i!:: That the Contractor agrees, pursuant to the provisions of the
Labor C:, b: of the State of California, to pay not less than the general pre -
i vailing rate of per diem wages and not less than the general prevailing
rate of per diem wage; for legal holidays and overtime work, for each craft
or ty,e- of .workman needed to execute the work under this agreement, as
ase2rtain�d by the City of Rancho Cuca:aonga, said provisions to be applicable
to pay for all workmen employed either by the Contractor or by any sub -
• contractors doing or contracting to do, any work under this agreement. Said
rate and scale are on file at the City Offices, and copies may be obtained.
F-3
TWELFTH: This Contract shall be for a period of nine (9) months commencing
on the 12th day of October, 1981, and ending the 30th day of June, 1982, •
unless terminated or extended as herein provided. The City reserves the right
of option to extend this contract from year to year commencing on the first (1st)
day of July of each fiscal year. In no event shall this contract be extended
beyond the 30th day of June, 1986.
THIRTEENTH: In the event this contract be extended, compensation shall be
as defined Paragraph "NINTH" adjusted as follows:
The City reserves the right to negotiate adjustment of unit cost with the con-
tractor at the beginning of each fiscal year. The unit cost shall not be
adjusted in excess of the change in consumer price index for the Los Angeles -
Long Beach Metropolitan Statistical Area as calculated from April 1st through
March 31st of the previous fiscal year. EXCEPT as determined by the City
Engineer as follows:
Where labor benefits are increased in the contractors labor agreement /contract
in excess of the index and /or where prevailing wages are increased in current
publication of the CalTrans General Prevailing Wage Rates in excess of the index
— and /or where material cost are increased uniformly in the area commonly known
as the West-End, San Bernardino County, in excess of the index and /or where
equipment rental rates are increased uniformly within the sphere of the City
I n excess of the index.
Adjusted cost shall be effective July 1st of each successive fiscal year through
the term of the contract unless terminated as provided herein. If the index is •
discontin,;eo or revised during the term such other governmental index or
computation with which it is replaced shall be used in order to obtain sub-
stantially the same result as would be obtained if the index had not be dis-
continued or revised.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said City of Rancho Cucamonga has, by order of its
City Council caused these presents to be subscribed by the Mayor and the
Seal of said City to be affixed and attested by the City Clerk, and the said
Contractor has subscribed his name hereto the day and year first above written.
Approved as to form and execution
CITY OF /�jt�ANCHO CUCAMONGA /
:i
Mayor of the City, of;�Rancho Cucamonga
ATTEST-
City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
LAI. ^.0 C0''3TTiCCT10\ CO, ING
CONTRACTOR:
F-4 8D
•
0
17J
•
5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982 lziw
TO: City Council and City Manager v'7
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Vacation of 22nd Street at Center Avenue and Alleyway between
22nd Street and 8th Street
Mr. Stephen Lucas of Lucas Land Company is requesting the City vacate
the portion of 22nd Street right -of -way, east of Center and the connecting
alleyway. This request is made on behalf of the owners of the property
contiguous to the north of the subject street.
22nd Street right -of -way is a 40' wide 145' long dedication, the east end
of which is connected to 8th Street through an alleyway (20' wide). No
improvement exists on 22nd Street nor on the alley.
Two existing residential structures at the corner of Center and 81th Street
have side street frontage. The two contiguous parcels on the south and
the east of 22nd Street and the alleyway are large industrial lots with
an industrial building on one. Both of these lots are under the same owner-
ship. The subject street presently is not a part of any circulation system,
and the present alignment is not suitable for orderly development of the
adjacent areas.
Planning Commission considered this vacation at the meeting of June 9, 1982,
and has recommended City Council conduct a Public Hearing according to law.
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached is a Resolution setting the Public Hearing for the above described
vacation. It is recommended City Council adopt said Resolution setting the
public hearing for August 4, 1982.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:BK:bc
Attachments
11
0
0
E
P .15e
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAJIO. \GA
�T
ENUNEERIXG DIVISION
VICINITY ML \P
1 r
P .15e
HUMBOLT
o�•
' rg(HUMBOLT) 8th
s izr
12
tl
to '
ti
uu
U
lj ev'
G)
1.21 AC MA
6
MAP 804-
PAR. No. I
4
e /�@ 3
l Red border outlines proposed lot
ti nias• t.,,• ao Blue border indicates parcels
owned by Scheu's and /or Lucas
r 22nd. ST.
R
i
01
litlr,•
No' cl t_1gN ; r•
'r^ CITY Of RANCHO CUG1MQ \GA
•� �ZZNO. ST
�4, ENGINPERING DIVISION T
� 1V
191n VICINITY MAP AaRe
L Lu C5 _any Co:
January 20, 1982
Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Rd.
Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Sir:
Messrs. Allyn and Leland Scheu and my father, Leon F. Lucas, are
the owners of land located in the vicinity of the southeast corner of 8th St.
and Center Ave, in Rancho Cucamonga (see attached plat). They have recently
acquired two lots (209 - 241 - 01602), which are separated from another parcel
of theirs by 22nd St. and the 20 ft. alley in the rear. Neither of these
rights -of -way are improved or in use by anyone. In fact, 22nd St. is a mound
of dirt a foot or two above Center Ave. They are not called for in the City's
Master Plan of Roads, and as agent for the owners of the land on all sides of
22nd St., I can assure you there are no private plans for use of that road
• in any future development.
E
The owners of the property have therefore asked me to instigate
proceedings for the abandonment of the rights -of -way in question. There are
a few lots north of ours which would be affected by the alley abandonment.
We cannot imagine why they would object to having their lots increased in size,
at the loss of an alley they don't use. If they should, however, we would
probably be satisfied with only the vacating of 22nd St. and the alleyway
behind our lot, and the creation of one new lot with 90 ft. of frontage on
Center Ave, and 145 ft. deep. We realize the usual procedure is to split
the dedication down the middle, but ;n this case the owners on both sides
are the same, and their wish is to take the two substandard parcels and make
one lot that would be, much more usable. We expect the Planning Dept would
like to see these 25 ft. lots cleared up, and the City also has public lia-
bility, maintenance responsibility, and lost tax revenues to consider. I'm
sure this matter can be worked out to the benefit and satisfaction of all
those concerned.
Please call if there is any prey I can help expedite matters.
f.egardsi_`
Strph n D. Lucas
Teak
RESOLDTTON W. 82 -115
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COCNCTL OF THE CITY OF FARM
WCA90NG,, COONTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE 22" STREET AT CENTER
... I STREET AND ALLEYWAY, BETWEEN 22ND STREET AND BM STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed
-Me' Section 8300, et. seq., of Ch. Street, and Highways Code, also
known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941.
SECTION 2: That the City Gaurcil hereby declares its
intention Co vacate 22nd Street at Center Avenue and Alleyway, be... 22nd Street atM 8th Scree[ a City street, as shown an Nap So. V -017 on
file I. the Office of the Clty Clerk, a legal deaaription of which is
attached hereto marked Exhibit "An and by reference made a par[ herenf.
SECTION J: net the City Council hereby ft.. Wednesday,
the 4th day of August, 1982, at 7:10 p.m., in the Lien's Park Community
Service Building, located at 9161 Use Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
as he time and place for hearing all paCaona nbJecting to the proposed
vacation for the Purpose of its determining whether said City street is
necessary for present or prospective street purposes.
SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause
notices to be posted conspicuously along the line of the street or part
thereof proposed to be vacated at feu[ 10 days before the hearing, not
more than LOO feet spar, and trot less than three signs shall be posted,
each of which shell have a Copy of this resolution on them and shall
have the following title In lettering not less than one inch In height:
"NOTICE OF NEARING TO VACATE STREET'.
SECTION 5: The subject v cation shall be subject tc the
reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities oa record.
SECTION 6: The ueyor shall sign this Resolution and the
City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause sane
t0 be published 10 days before the data set for the hearing, at least
Once In Me Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982,
ATES: Schalsaeq Debt, Nikels
+H•Im salwwft mwaVrr•y rfa..yr.•, N,yN �.;
NOES: None
AM117: Buquet, Frost
D. Mt els, tseyot
/ATTEST:
nreNa n N, Wasserman, City Clerk
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Mubbs, City Engineer
BY: John L. Martin, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Award of Base Line Street Improvement
On June 25, 1982 bids were received on the Base Line Road 'morovement Project.
The low bidder was Fontana Paving at $75,690.50. The Engineer's Estimate
for the project was $80,000.00. The Staff has analyzed the bids and finds
thein correct and acceptable. The low bidder, Fontana Paving was 5% below
the Engineer's Estimate. A summary of all bids is attached.
RECOXMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Council award the contract to Fontana Paving at
575,690.50, authorize execution of the contract and the contract amount plus
10; for contingencies.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:JL?1:bc
Attachment
LIIY 91 IWIUM CUMMUM
SUYWRY OF PROPOSALS OPENED
PROJECT BASE LINE WIDENING AND RECONSTRUCTION DATE JUKE 25, 1982
LOCATION ACCODMT NO. 06 -25 -64
•
4
ji
F�
17
Fontana Paving
Robert Escudero
Laird Ccnst. Co.
Riverside COnst. Co
Sully- Miller
R.G. Wteatly
ITEMS
OUANIli1ES
BID A �!llli
BIO
AMOUNT
BID
A901111T
OIO
AMOUNT
BOOT
X',G6fi
61�
KiPU'.I
_ _Bidder's_ Bond
$75,690.50
$89,515.70
$79,225.00
581,425.30
S79,B87 -10
579.99.
1
Clearing 6 Grubbing
Lump 5u
9,940.00
10.200.00
7.825.00
9,000.00
51100.00
8,4i_
2
Earth Work
Lump 5w
6,000.00
7,750.00
L250.00
8,2m.W
7.3m oo
2.46..
3
P.C.C. Curb 6 Gutter
486 L.F.
5.75
2,794.50
6.85
3.329.10
7.40
3,596.40
6.65
3,231.90
7.10
3.450.60
6.25
3.037.'
4
P.L.C. Sidewalk
2760 S.F.
1.25
3,450.00
1.50
4,140.00
1.37
3.781.20
1.40
3,854.00
1.45
41002.00
1.40
3,864.'
5
A.C. Paving
1800 Tans
24.18
43,524.00
25.82
46.476.00
30.15
54,270.00
25.00
45,000.00
26.00
46,800.80
29.00
52,20;,.
6
P.C.C. Drive Approach
165 S.F.
1.60
264.00
3.00
495.00
2.20
363.00
2.00
330.00
1.90
313.50
2 -25
371..
7
A.C. Berm L $ M
624 L.F.
2.00
1,248.00
3.40
2,121.60
3.00
1.872.00
1.85
1,154.40
2.25
1,404.00
3.00
1,872.
8
Type L or N Markers
7 Ea.
40.00
280.00
30.00
210.OD
95.00
665.00
55.00
385.00
55.00
385.00
50.00
350.
9
Raising Manholes to Grade
2 Ea.
140.00
280.00
00.00
600.00
250.00
500.00
380.00
760.00
220.00
l 440.00
.80.00
560.
10
Raising Water Valves to
10 Ea,
40.00
400.00
20.00
200.00
33.00
330.00
60.00
600.00
100.00
I 1,000.00
50.00
500.
Grade
11
all rete Block Retaining
580 S.F.
12.50
7,250.00
23.50
13.630.00
7.00
4,060.00
14.00
8,120.00
15.20
8.816.00
10.00
5.80C.
N
Wall
12
A.C. Orivway L a M
52D S.F.
0.50
260.00
0.70
364.00
1.37
712.00
1.50
780.00
1.30
676.00
1.00
520.
TOTAL
$75,690.50
$89,515.70
$79.224.601
$81,425.30
�S79.687.10•
$79,999.
CORRECTED TOTAL 810
I
•
4
ji
F�
17
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1982 -83 ENGINEER'S REPORT
• FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER
SECTIOii 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article
d, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The report deals with the actual costs for Fiscal Year 1981 -82 and the
estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1982 -83 of Landscape Maintenance District
No. 1 for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Areas to
be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report
and on the attached Asse.�sment Diagrams. The total area of said parkways being
199,936 square feet (area amended per actual field measurement). Work to be pro-
vided for, with the assessments established by the District are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinanry
and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration
of any parkway improvement. Improvement maintenance is con-
sidered of general benefit to all areas in the District and
cost shall be divided on a per lot basis.
SECTION 3, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Parkway improvements were constrcted by the developers for the individual
subdivision parkways, The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions
cf approval for each subdivision ans as approved by the City Planning Division.
.Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagram for the
exact location of the landscape areas. The plans and specifications for landscape
im rovement on the individual tracts are hereby made a part of this report to the
sane extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities on the enumerated parkway areas include:
the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing
for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation,
irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the
removal of trirsnings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair,
and repleurrent as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti
fr;;;; wall; inzaediately adjacent to the cultivated areas.
SF.CTIV 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
flue to general deterioration, vandalism or loss various parkways within
the District will be renovated, repaired and replanted at an estimated cost of
517,759.66. Based an historical data adjusted for inflation, it is estimated that
riaintenance cost for assessment purposes will equal twenty -five cents ($.25) per
square foot for the fiscal year 1982 -83. These costs are estimated only, actual
assessment will be based on actual cost data.
1922 -83 Engineer's Report
Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 1
Page 2
1981 -82 Estimated Assessment Cost
$.30 X 187,449 sq. ft. _ $56,234.70
556,234.70 - 892 lots = $63.04
$56,234.70 less (695 X $34.92 or $24,269.40) _ $31,965.30
695 lots X $28.12 ($63.04 - $34.92 surplus) + (188 +9) X $63.04 = $31,962.28
1981 -82 Actual Cost Summar
Contract Maintenance $12,524.33
Utilities 1,512.62
Administration 2,702.52
TOTAL 18,202.62
•
1981 -82 Actual Assessment = $28.12 X 695 + 197 X $63.04 = $31,962.28
Actual Assessment ($31,962.28) less Actual Cost ($18,202.62) _ $13,259.66 CARRY
OVER FOR RESTORATION
1982 -83 Estimated Assessment Cost
$.20 X 199,936 square feet (revised per field measurement) _ $39,987.00
Restoration of Base Line Parkway from Ramona to Teak Way
Estimated at $13,759.66
SECTIO1 5. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed plaster Assessment diagram is attached to this
report and labeled "Exhibit A ". Detailed diagrams of each tract are included.
These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this repurt. Lot dimensions
are as shown on individual Tract Maps as shown in records of County Recorder.
TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1981 -83 = 892
ANNEXATION 51JyYARY:
Tract No. of Lots *Assessable
P.N. 5922 4 0
Tract 10491 20 0
Tract 10569 42 0
Tract 9484 -1 47 0
Tract 9633 25 0
Tract 1045 -1 114 0
Tract 11350 16 0
Tract 9584 52 0
Tract 9584 -2 45 0
Tract 9441 72 0
D.R. 80 -34 1 0
Tract 11609 12 0
Tract 11696 6 0
Tract 10762 84 0
Tract 10277 -1 8 0
Total Lots 548 0
*NOTE: Only annexed Tract, 60� occupied shall be included for assessment purposes
TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1982 -83 = 892
•
1982 -83 Engineer's Report
Landscape Plaint. Dist. No. 1
Page 3
• SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT
Improvement for the entire district are found to be of general benefit
to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel.
It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District.
ASSESSMENT = $39,987.00 : 892 = $44.83 ( §45.00)
n
•
RESOLUTION NO. 5,Q-1140
• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
140. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the
provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows:
Description of Work
SECTION 1: That the public interest and convenience require and it is
the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Land-
scape Maintenance District No. 1 for the fiscal year 1982 -83, for the maintenance
and operation of those parkways and facilities thereon dedicated for common green-
belt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of
said District. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision
of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings, landscaping, ornamental lighting,
structures and walls in connection with said parkways.
Location of Work
SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within roadway
• right of way and landscaping easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer
and more particularly described on naps which are on file in the City Clerk's
Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance District No. 1."
Description of Assessment District
SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City
Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City
Council hereby makes the expense of the said work chargeable upon a district,
which said district is assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which
district is described as follows:
All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included
within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1," indicating by said boundary line the extent of the
territory included within the proposed assessment district and which map is on
file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City.
Ro.orence is hereby made to said map for further, full and more particular
description of said assessment district, and the said map so on file shall govern
for all details as to the extent of said assessment district.
Re >4 nrt of Enn ineer
SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has
• approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount
of the proposed assessment, the district boundary, assessment zones, and the method
of assessment. The report titled "Annual Engineer's Report, Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1" is on file in the office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference
to said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the •
assessments and for the extent of the work.
Time and Place of Hearing
SECTION 5: Notice is hereby given that on the 21st day of July, 1982,
at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, any and all persons may appear and show cause why said work should not
be done or carried out or why assessments should not be levied and collected for
fiscal year 1982 -83. Protests must be in writing and must contain a description
of the property in which each signer thereof is interested, sufficient to identify
the sane, and must be delivered to the City Clerk of said City prior to the time
set for the Hearing, and no other protests or objections will be considered. If
the signer of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll of
San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in the protests, then
such protest must contain or, be accompanied by written evidence that such signer is
the owner of the property so described.
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
SECTION 6: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through
in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of California designated the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California.
Publication of Resolution of Intention
SECTION 7: Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of
the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall
attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days
before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Dail Report, a newspaper
of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTCST:
Lauren 1-1. 'Wasserman, City Clerk
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
•
•
• RESOLUTION NO. %;L-/l %
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1.
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City
Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual
report in writing for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay
the costs of the improvement of said Landscape Maintenance District Number 1.
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed witn the City Clerk of
said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act,
which has been presented to this Council for consideration;
WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every
part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient,
and that said report, nor any part thereof, requries or should be modified in any
respect;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows:
® 1. That thn Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses
of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in
said reprot be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
2. That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and
described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said
Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said
Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said
subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof,
as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report
for the fiscal year 1982 -83 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Jon D. Mike s, Mayor
0
0
•
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Richard Cota, Associate Civil Engineer
F'
197;
SUBJECT: Award of Design Services for Storm Drain Improvements within
Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue
Proposals were received May 7, 1982 for the design of storm drain improvements
within Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue. The storm drain being considered is a
portion of Line 2 -F in the City's Comprehensive Storm Drain Master Plan, as pre-
pared by L. D. King, Inc. and shown on the attached map. The limits, for project
design purposes, start at the intersection of Alta Loma Drive and Beryl Street,
then south to the Beryl Street Basin, then southeasterly along the existing
earth channel crossing under 19th Street, to the outlet on Hellman Avenue,
thence south on Hellman Avenue to the Cucamonga Storm Drain south of Base Line
Road.
Six proposals were received and are listed in the attached tabulation. Four
design alternatives were considered and are likewise tabulated below:
Alternative
Storm Fa c il icy
Between Beryl St.
and Hellman Ave.
Construction
Phase
I
Open Channel
1
2
IA
Closed Conduit
1
2
II
Open Channel
1
IIA I
Closed Conduit
1
Ahern: ives I and IA have two construction phases. Phase one limits are Alta
Levi 'Jriie to the confluence on Hellman Avenue. Phase two limits are the
confluence on Hellman Avenue to the Cucamonga Storm Drain. The difference
between alternatives I and IA will be the choice of storm facility to replace
the existing earth channel; that is, an open concrete channel or a pipe.
Alternatives II and IIA are the same as alternatives I and IA; however, they
are based on one construction phase covering the entire limits of the project.
The actual design alternative will be selected subsequent to preliminary field
investigations by the firm contracted for design services.
continued...
G `{
City Council Staff Report
Re: Beryl /Hellman Storm Drain Design
July 1, 1982
Page 2
The Engineering Staff recommends the firm of Bill Mann 8 Associates as the
most favorable of the lowest bidders. Mr. Mann has extensive experience in
the flood control and drainage field within San Bernardino County, as well as
prior experience with consulting engineering firms in the fields of street and
highway design. Also, Mr. Mann has performed most of the Master Plan studies
for the project. As a former Flood Control Engineer, he will provide a valuable
interface with the County Flood Control District.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council award the design services to Bill Mann and
Associates and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract documents.
Res: ctfully submitt d,
LBH:RC:bc
Attachments
9S
•
•
• Diil AWY •
DEW,:: SERVICES FOR STORM DP.AIn '.r "W'.1UM4TS WITHIN BERYL STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE
EIRE!
ALTERNATIVES`
1
(Open Channel)
IA
(Closed Conduit
I]
(Open Channel)
(Closed
(Closed Conduit}
Linville, Sanderson,
Horn
nrn & Associates
$37,500
-
b32 ,800
$36,000
Bill Mann 8 Assoc.
$46,980
$46,980
$40,750
$40,750
C.G. Engineering
$54,768'
$51,120
$49,514
$45,960
Associated Engineers
$56,295
$54,745
$52,340
$51,240
L. D. King, Inc.
$89,900
$89,900
$87,300
$87,300
Psomas 8 Assoc.
$92,500
$91,500
$90,500
$88,500
- Alternatives 18 IA: Phase 1 - Alta Loma Drive to Confluence on Hellman Ave.
Phase 2 - Confluence at Hellman Ave. to Cucamonga Storm Drain.
Alternatives II 8 IIA: Phase 1 - Alta Loma Drive to Cucamonga Storm Drain.
'6�r.:
_ L J"� =� - ^- �1�. ._£ /,1,�• . � 02.5.
• ;.. ; . (. 1, :;4' • r.. /�• C.
• O .£ ^jam ±:::}:' ?..✓4�
24. ps
• 4 �• 11 21- JB____
T`:
, Sf —J•
�.�J�.�:j � 2i- _ G
. a
^y1 _ - ,�u.w.o, wu•o nisi vc:': j•
..: - "..' 83" �. o- ,y .� r;�� !'; ..i4� =lam' � . 1� ; .' ����; -• ' .�• I
:_.�� �.;;: ✓ "— {1��af�" "fig: ,� .-^,' .��.,' /.�
} i• i..` f, Jr 1��'a /Iatl s 6: 8}
`— l,,,r.. 75t
...: - �.
-' ��'. �..,i ��'�: �`''.= lt��.Yf «��..r _.. -� • L•r "� —.mss: '�'
iCCaIF�:Eii= i`::i!c S�'idd �, ^• ::d ?L�_11
(t � r• �. i-• 517 N. Ev:i1: ,.cc-_ JU ::E I ,, .
_,C'.1 .,1 �I_ Q•,ar,'0. CA M-.2 `'Del "I "•;;,7•;:!G I G-
9y
AGREEAENT FOR ENCINEERING SCRYfCrS
THIS AGREEfENT in made and entered into this _ day of
1982, hetwemn the CITY OF RANC110 CIICANONGAr a Hunlcipal Corporation, herein-
- after referred to as ^CITY ", and B[lt NAVY Ala ASSOCIATES, duly licensed
Engineers, of 107Z1 Arrow Route, Suite 218, Whimeha Cucamonga. California,
hereinafter referred to ne "CNGtNEEF ":
RITHESSETH:
WHEREAS, the CITY has need for engineering services, ranaisting of the
preparation of improvement plans, specifications, estimates and other pro -
feSSional services for the construction Of aides, drain if, fr. the inter -
section of Rif,l Street and Alta Loma Drive south and southeasterly to the
intersection of Hellman Ave", one then southerly along Hallman Avenue to the
Cucamonga Storm Drain, and far the widening, raeonetrucgon, and resurfacing
of portions of Beryl Street from Alt. Lama Drive to I9th Street, and Hellman
• Avenue from the wash confluence to the Cucamonge Storm Drain. Said project is
herein referred to .1lectively ea "PROJECT ".
U
tl PEAS, the CITY vat invited the ENGIWCR to provide required engineering
services for the CITY;
wHERE45, the MINCER has apeclalired knowledge, training and experience
in design Ind construction Of streets and dralnnge facilities:
AW, 'AR Rf1'i. the ENGINFIt uolicatr:.illingneae to perform enginOPrlml
services far the CITY under conlrocf.
NMI, tl irpdrORC, the C{ly and the ENG 1'.!rR, for the room Jena, Inns brh'pl-
nftcr nannA, gr,, ns mile.,;
1R VIF I fhI- f%rIVfR illulell to f.11111th oral per hum the 1.11 lall:i prom:'iin"it
;envu rv„ pert enrol. to pl'rpart mn of ;,old Plan, antl npecifiealian: Jnd Cost
Inllnnn:
98
A. Preliminary Deaim
1. Provide field surveys necessary to establish existing and future street
cross sections, grades, storm drain design, and street widening.
2. Provide necessary soil investigations for structural section and pipe
bedding design.
0. Provide independent hydrologic and hydraulic review for location and
sizing of proposed storm drain using the existing facilities and the
update of the City's Comprehensive Storm Drain Master Plan and City
standards.
a. Review the connection to the Cucamonga Storm Drain, the future use of
the existing Beryl Basin, anal a possible connection to the Beryl Avenue
Storm Drain with the San Bernardino Coonty flood Control District and
City Staff.
5. Provide analyst. of closed versus open storm drain construction for the
reach between 19th Street and Hellman Avenue, and the temporary outlet
onto Hellman Avenue, if found necessary due to phase construction.
6. Coordinate and review the conflicts with utility companies and other
involved agencies and necessary design requirements.
7. Research and plat existing right of way and easement and identify
additional right of way needs.
7. Provide design recommendations for the reconstruction or overlaying
and widening as necessary for Beryl Street and Hellman Avenue within
the reach of the project. Street plans will be provided separate from
the storm drain plans.
9. A preliminary design report will be pruvlded addressing all of the
abo,e for City r.vie.w prior to fimnl lesion init lot ion.
B. f�ual 9r•:.inr,
1. Opnn approval of !hr plrlim,mo, dns,gn ronrrpt: and ratan n, thr r \Di %rri
shall prrpare final design plans for the storm drain, and for that part,on
of Beryl Street and Ilellm,n .lvenae requiring widening, rsconstruvtlnn/
resarfacimv.. .1 dnphnic Cron: re to overlay.
If the CITY elects to l,m,t thn Pro fret to rho ^,e I (Alfa lama I)rave to
9q
2-
0
L
the confluence at Hellman Avenue), the design plans will include a
temporary tlet of drainage flaws onto Hellman Avenue. Street plans
will only include Beryl Street north of 19th Street.
2. Prepare contract specifications and quantity estimates in conformance
with CITY Aid San Bernardino flood Control District widelines for
Project construction. -
S. Submit design plane to CITY and San Bernardino County flood Control
District for plan cback and review.
4, Make neccssaty plan revisions to meet CITY and District requirements
aM approval.
5. Prepare right -of -way deeds and maps as re Wired.
6. Upon receipt of construction bids, ENGINEER shall assist CITY in the
analysis of bids and make recommendations on the award of contract.
C. fleproduation
• Original tracings shall become the property of the CITY upon com,letier.
of contract. Costs for reproduction of plans and specifications will
_ be borne by the CITY.
ARTICLE 11 The CITY agrees to pay ENGINEER, as compensation for the named
professional services, as follows:
A. If Alternates II 6 IIA (Alta Loma Drive to Cucamonga Storm Drain) is
selected.
1. Preliminary Design $24,600
2. final Design $16.150
Total $A0.750
B. If Alternates I A TA is selected:
Phnac 1 (Alta Lawn Drive to conflue.me of wash at RvIlman Avenue)
1. Preliminary Design $14,910
2. final lmsup $111.110
Total $25,210
. Phn..e II !Ibwlla,a, at Ilcllnm Avnnuc to Cucoeunnd 'Maim Praini
yy
3
0
1. Preliminary Design E12,620
2. final Design 9 9115
Total 521,770
It is assumed that if the project is accomplished in phases, Phase I will
be accomplished first. '
C. If the ENGINEER recelves authorization to proceed oa parts of the
PRDJECT after August 1, 1982. the fee for those parts of the project
delayed shall be renegotiated, as necessary, to reflect passible in-
creased costs in Inner and supplies.
D. The ENGINEER will bill the CITY monthly for that portion of the fee
for each item completed at the data of billing,
ARTICLE Ill The ENGINEER agrees to perform the above services within the
•
fallowing time limita:
A. Preliminary Oesign - The items listed in Article I (A) will be performed
and the preliminary design report will be submitted within 60 calendar
days from the Notice to Proceed.
B. Final Design - Plans and ducanelto will be submitted to the CITY Wr
plan check within 60 calendar do,. from the CITY approval of the
Preliminary design concepts and report.
ARTICIF TV Either party of this agreement shall heyc the right to cancel
or suspend the agrrement by groin, each plhar fiftpan (W do), written
notice to that error L. If such eaneellation or suspension shall take effect
during 6m per /nrmanm nI any encamp leted work, MI %N R .hall be paid the
1eminn.,1 ,, value or the work acru,.U11hriJ. at the rat,; sat forth in f.niblt"1 ".
ARI If II V All ter,,, caadltlpli'1 and provi:ilans hereof shall inure to and
all it l hl lid the Turtles Iln vu, Ihnrr 'i llf rl•naa r..And ,ss,m,
/0/
4-
•
BILL MANN &ASSOCIATES
Civil Engineering • Drainage — Flood Control 4r Special Studies
•
STANDARD RATE SCHEDULE
August 1, 1981
Principal Con lting
Mee w> tent, Agencies, and
presentations to Boards, Councils
and Agencies, and related work
Planning and Engineering
Frincipai Engineering, Project Managing
Project Engineering, Designing
Research, Field Review
Report Preparation
Drafting
• Senior Drafter, Design Drafter
Drafter
Technician, Engineering Aide, and
Junior Drafter
i•
Miscellaneous Services and Expenses
Court Appearances, Preparation and
Denositions
Clerical /Delivery
Mileage
Materials and other expenses
Outside Consultants and Services
$75.00 /hour
$55.00 /hour
$42.00 /hour
$42.00 /hour
$35.00 /hour
$34.00 /hour
$30.00 /hour
$22.00 /hour
$100.00 /hour or
By Agreement
$20.00 /hour
$ 0.30 /mile
Cost plus 15%
Cost plus 15%
NOTE':: Unless other arrangements are made, a 15%
retainer will be requested ($500 minimum).
Overtime will be 135% of standard hourly rates.
Statements will be presented bi- weekly.
EXHIBIT "A"
823 Val Mar Road • San Bernardino. California 92404 • (714) 888.2979
/n'T
•
11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -02 -
TENTATIVE ACT 0826 - LES - A change of zone from
R- 1- 20,009 (Single Family Residential -1/2 acre lots)
to R -2 1PD (Two Family Residential /Planned Development)
and the development of 27 single family units, 81 patio
homes and 202 townhouse units on 57.7 acres of land,
located between Haven Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, approx-
imately 660' south of Wilson - APN 201 - 181 -12, 13, 14, 02
63, 65 and 69.
SU;411ARY: This proposal is for a planned residential development
consisting of 27 single family homes, 81 patio homes, and 202 town -
homes on 57.7 acres of land, in conjunction with a zone change from
R- 1- 20,000 to R -2 /PD and the issuance of a Negative Declaration.
The Planning Commission, at its meeting of June 9, 1982, held a duly
advertised public hearing to consider the above - described project and
approved the related Tract Map with Conditions as attached, and recom-
mended approval of the Negative Declaration and Zone Change. Please
find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report, which
fully describes the project.
The proposed project is consistent with all related City ordinances
and plans. The proposed overall density of 5,4 dwelling units per
acre is consistent with the General Plan. Half of the site is desig-
nated as Low Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and
thq other half as Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per
acre;. No adverse environmental impacts are anticpcted as a result
of this project.
CORRESP0NDENCE: There was no public opposition voiced at the Plan-
ning Commission public hearing. This item was advertised as a public
hearing and notices were mailed to property owners to discuss the
project. Attached is a letter from the Deer Creek Homeowner's Asso-
ciation supporting the project.
/a3
• PD 82- 02 /Lesny
City Council Agenda
July 7, 1982
Page 2
RECO_MENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council
approve Planned Development 82 -02 for the above - described project through
adoption of the attached Ordinance and issue a Negative Declaration.
I
Respect u sI bmitte
1 1 j
JACK LAN, AICP
• Director of Community Development
JL:DC:jr
•
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolution of Approval
Letter from Deer Creek Homeowner's Association
City Council Ordinance
lay
/ -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
�!O Gucn.vlru,�
� ) 9}
1917
DATE: June 9, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
DY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -02
TENTATIVE TRACT 10826 - LESNY - A change of zone from
R-1-20,000 Singe ami y Residential - v, acre lots) to
R -2 /PD (Two Family Residential /Planned Development) and
the development of 27 single family units, 81 patio homes
and 202 townhouse units on 57.7 acres of land, located
between Haven and Hermosa, approximately 660 feet south
of Wilson - APN 201- lB1 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63, 65, and 69.
. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of
a Planned 0eve opment in the R -1- 20,000 zone (R -2 /PD pending), located
between Haven and Hermosa, south of Wilson (Exhibit "A "). The property
is Presently vacant and slopes from the north to south at approximately
5 -6,, grade as shown on the Natural Features Map (Exhibit "I "). This site
is across the street from Chaffey College and north of a flood control
basin.
0
ANALYSIS; The project has been reviewed by the Design Review, Growth
F,ang,nent, Grading, and Equestrian Advisory Committees. All the issues
and concerns of these Committees are reflected in the attached Tentative
Tract :lap (Exhibit "B "), Development Plans and recommended Conditions of
Approval. This Planned Development has been designed with a private
street system, therefore, there are no street connections proposed to
future streets on surrounding properties. The Site Utilization Map
(Exhibit "J ") indicates a master plan for a street system that would
enable surrounding properties to be subdivided and developed. The
,radinq Plan, Exhibit "F ", was revised to maintain more of the natural
contwr; and to provide appropriate drainage structures to accept and
diver-, :iatr into tho flood control basin to the south.
DESIGN aE71 C.1 COMMITTEE: The Committee has worked with the Applicant in
re;oly ing concerns relative to mix of architectural styles to reinforce
the village concept, providing tot lots, grading, and street design.
Therefore, the Design Review Committee recommends approval of this
project.
/ or
PD 82- 02 /Lesny
Planning Commission Agenda •
June 9, 1982
Page 2
EN'JIRON'1ENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the
Applicant, is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of
the initial Study and found that although the project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
because the mitigation measures described in the attached Initial Study
Part II have been added to the project. Therefore, staff recommends issu-
ance of a Negative Declaration,
FACTS FOR FINDING: The Subdivision Map has been prepared in accordance
with City standards and policies including the new Council Resolution on
north Alta Loma. The project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision
and the project design is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordi-
nance requirements.
CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Hearing was published in The Daily Re
newspaper and approximately 26 notices were sent to property owners withip n
300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received
either for or against this project. Prior to the public hearing, the Appli-
cant will be meeting with surrounding property owners to discuss the project.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a •
public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If,
after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and Condi-
tions of Approval, the the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance
of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate.
R spectfully submitted,
RICK OHEZ ,P
Ci`,ty Planner
RG`OC:jr
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map
Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan 5 Phasing Plan
Exhibit "0" - Illustrative Site Plan
Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibits "G -1" through "G -5" - Elevations
Exhibits 91-1" through "H -3" - Floor Plans
Exhibit "I" - Natural Features Nap •
Exhibit "J" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "K" - Haven Streetscape
Exhibit "L" - Sections
Initial Study Parts I & II
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
/60
0
0
,,I t ;;.: � n !1
CI'T'Y OI,
RANCI -IO CUC MONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
ITEM:
TITIY: Lai:ATOJ �fkh
/07
NORTH
E-d
•
TZ
NORTH
ary OF ITEM: Ir fcfzl� o
RANO-10 CUCANNIONGA TITLE J—d-=IVI'5SfCSJ bW •
PLANNING DIVISIWN L'XIIIIiIT: _SCALE
167
F- -I
L-A
1v
ary of
lt:k.Ncl lo cucvmom,,A
PLANNING DIVISION
.. .............
C�
Ir 10 S Zp NORTH
ITIAI: wiwn qsrm tp/Aol
TiTIT1_0664WA SAM
EXI HBIT: ACw
i
0
U�IIU UX AAIE1111Y m oar M�
V V
FORTH
CITY OF ITEM; Mir 041 Z4 . - •
RANCI "j0 CUCANIONGA TITLE:llllL'nS6T,4 fftTZL�`�'
PLANNING DIVISION l \IIII >IT � -SGU.G r
//o
.rr
`emu
eyea��
�'y�1
nsenuM m^,I
0
U�IIU UX AAIE1111Y m oar M�
V V
FORTH
CITY OF ITEM; Mir 041 Z4 . - •
RANCI "j0 CUCANIONGA TITLE:llllL'nS6T,4 fftTZL�`�'
PLANNING DIVISION l \IIII >IT � -SGU.G r
//o
-a 7ZL �y
E��
r
L-
L..
�V
41
R
a )'C
vi
"l nn
r
L-
NORTH
CM' OF ITEM: 7r 1ojT4'
RANCI-K) CUC: MONGA -rrrl.l::c=ZMA L lAND-9V.AfM
PLANNING DIVISION LM 1113IT —eL-- SCALD ��
L..
�V
41
R
"l nn
NORTH
CM' OF ITEM: 7r 1ojT4'
RANCI-K) CUC: MONGA -rrrl.l::c=ZMA L lAND-9V.AfM
PLANNING DIVISION LM 1113IT —eL-- SCALD ��
•
NORTH
CITY OF IT[:,\I:-., 7rioemooed
R'kNCIIO CUCk TITLE; z&TV-AL -cp �^0
PLANNING DIVISION EXI IIBIT: SCALE:
//a
•
'�-77
•
�7n
jo
RrA Lr. 5(0e Fiza4-1 SILK
H em
NORTH
• R ll::5zo(
RANCIA) CUCANIONC , A I ITLE: V, YYATjbh4e&
L.\lHBIT:A9-o-Lsc\u::
113
n
=`
h.
-.. tr
eta LT. SIDS M?4)T Im sce
fA-tra �+�
G1
NNORTH
J
•
CITY OF ITLAI: — Ir 101.1 L6p •
IZA-NC I-IO CLCAMONGA TITIT: �Ls"S►�i�"If w
PLANNING DIVISION LXHIISIT`A__'. SCALE: ��"
4.
LT,
7�
CITY OF
Cl-l() CL:C:\NIONGA TITLE
SCALE;
PLANNING DI%'ISI()%N' ENIIIIIM*&�;b
i95 I W i 104 104 a04
a
TOWNHaV06
C;�
CITY OF ITEN 1: 10
RANCHO CUC-�INIUNGA TITID
PLANNING DIVISION FXIIII!IT:46t-'4.SCkLE:
0
•
A 71
w7aT
V,
ig
Ma 1 003 i 403 1 993 1 893 1 gel
-TbWH H CH swo�
NORTI i
CITY OF ITIAll— oTr �014� I
RA NCI K.) CUCAMONGA TITIE: 04APro."as.
PLANNING DIVISION r-\l IMIT: SCALE:
117
- - - - - - - - - - --
Ml,
E — '831
TLH
ILI
�� � ___ .- -_V__= _ _ _ _ _ —_ alt_. _ #..
NORTH
CITY U., I A 19 7,4o •
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:
PLANNING, DIVISION EN111131TI-I 'scmx�l
7 M:�m
.. .............
1-7
it
Ittw
WA-A-A'
7 ......
FATVO HcMet-,
CITY OF ITFN 1: OTNOTZ4.
• ik.\,\Cl K) CL:C;-vNIO,\('yA TITLE: P^WL/tOl
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT:* ' LS"-\[.E:
INORTI I
"ITE7
wx�
11 nmu
•
I ii
—004
ise...
I Lj7
INP WC11*1e6
INORTI I
CITY OF ITEM: -- 10
RANCI 10 CUCIAIN IONG
TITLE:-
PLANNI\G DWISION M111IT: Mp!!7 SCALE
/96 -
0
j
1-
0
_...
0#04%
T
an, oi,
RANCI10 CSC:- iJI0,AC ,-i
PLANNING DIVISION
ITI: \I
L\ I I I BIT _.%_ SCA Lf:
/2/
'•r
IKO)RTIi
J
r �
LNORTH
J
CITY OF ITEM: `V" 10,926,
RAMC I I() CLCr1MONGA TITLE : n- Lm L4 mAmesi �A4P •
PLANNING, [INVISM, EXIII)I _J,T-SCALE --
/ .2.7
•
C
I
.. ice:
CITY OF
RANCHO CUC- kNIO \C,,1
PLANNING DIVISION
ITEM: -- -7r in}� �?op4o
TITLE
L'N11113IT: SG\LI
/a-
V V
NORTH
lip
0
T
IL--
L
•
r-�
NORTH
crry (v i,rr,.% i; -T /04;z&
RANCHO CUCANIONGA TITLE: selapcN:57 0
PLANNING DIVISION ENIIIBIT; Li SCAM �
laq
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORF,ATION SEEET - To be completed by applicant
Enviro=ental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Development
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Enviro=.ental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review
Co-r..ittee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) dev=_ before the public meeting at which tiae the
protect is to be heard. The Corntittee will make one of
three acterminat ions: 1) The project will have no
envir --a.ertal impact and a Nagative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental i. -,pact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
• 3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project.
PROJLCT TITLE: H d R h -
F.PPL ?C. I'S NAVE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Lesgv Development Co.
12111 1153 -7117
ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
C0:ICM',';1`1G TDIS PROJECT: Frank R. Williams- Associated Engineers.
31,, i:e: <t "E" Street, Ontario, CA r 91764, (714)986 -5818
IAG:T IO:i OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS F.a� ASSESSOR PaRCEI NO.)
•. ;r. Ii.. ^.:•on Ave. & Hermosa AVP., rfO'* so. of Wilson
i,ssessor Parca No. 'r 201-181-12,201-181-14,201-18 -02r2C - 181 -13,
201 - 181 - 63,201- 181- 65,201- 181 -69.
LIST O':IiER PER:4ITS \iCESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONi.L, STATE AIM
FEDEP.AL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUIi:G SUCH PE R:4ITS:
• Cncrnechncnt nernip from, San 0 rn rd' County Flood Co t, 1 Dist ',t_
D,nartment of Real Estate Public Report.
I -1
J-25—
C
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
•
6 a recreational area.
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Proiect area = 57.70 acres cross
and 56.12 acres net. Area of proposed buildings a 409,870 sq. ft.
DLSCRIPE THE ENVIFO.7! :NTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDI_:G INfOA.M +: ION ON TOPOSRAMY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANI4fALS, ANY CULTI". :L, HISTORICAL OR SCE "IC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PFOPERTIES, Atli THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY
EXISTING STRUCTUR?S AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS):
ire nt And ninogs unifnrmly From north to meth. It
is on the west side of the alluvial fan formed by Deer Canyon. •
Tbgre ar no n+ +ra= on the C ara no trooa. The f nra rcn,iate of
native scrub plants and weeds. The wildlife includes ground rodents,
lizards, and birds common to residential areas. Deer and Coyotes occasionally
There are no known cultural or historical aspects of significance.
Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact?
•
I- 2
C
WILL THIS PROJECT:
• YES NO
_ x 1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
X— 2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
_ x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)'.
X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or
general plan designations?
• x 5: Remove any existing trees? How many?
_ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardo_r materials such as
toxic substances, flan cables or explosives?
• Explanation of any YrS answers above: 2. a substantial increase
in noise will only occur during construction.
4. toning will be changed for a planned unit development.
if the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
CERTIrlCATIOtd: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above an9 in the attached exhibits present the data and
inlor -. .cation recuired for this initial evaluation to the
bnct of my ability, and that the feets, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand tln t
additional information may be required to be submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Dcve- lopr:.m[
Review Committee.
• D3LC / �b 11� Signat Lre,
Title Ya_x .0
I -3 /27
0
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability
of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential
development.
LESNY DEVELOPMENT CO.
Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10826
Specific Location of Project: Between Haven Ave. 6 Hermosa Avenue.
660'! South of Wilson Avenue.
I -4
12$
•
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 5
TOTAL
NUMBER OF
TOWNHOMES
62
i.f
58
28
0
202
NUMBER OF
PATIO HOMES
0
37
0
44
0
81
NUMBER OF
ESTATE HOMES
0
0
0
0
27
27
GfGE FR�7C--E0 TO
5 -83
11 -83
8 -84
5 -SS
2 -86
BEGIN COHBTRUCTION
EARLIEST DATE. OF
OCCUPANCY
2 -84
11 -84
8 -85
5 -86
2 -87
I -4
12$
•
•
•
PLAN
NO. OF
TENTATIVE PRICE RANGE
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE. 5
NUMBER
BEDROOMS
$57,000-
$62,700-
$68,970-
$75,865-
801
1B
62,700
68,970
75,865
83,450
82,000-
90,200-
99,220-
109,140-
802
IB /Den
90,200
99,220
109,140
120,060
95,000-
104,500-
114,950-
126,445-
803
2B
104,500
114,950
126,445
139,090
85,000-
93,500-
102,850-
113,135-
804
1B /Lib.
93,500
102,850
113,135
124,450
93,000-
102,300-
112,530-
123,780-
805
1B /Lf:.).
102,300
112,530
123,780
136,160
102,300-
123,780-
811
2B
--
--
112,530
136,160
121,000-
146,410-
812
3B
--
113.100
161,050
130,900-
158,390-
813
3B
--
743,990
174,230
--
$165,440-
821
3B
--
--
-
181,980
181,545-
822
3B /Don
199,700
210,830-
823
ao
--
--
--
--
231,910
I -5
/,:).7
C
ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10826
`J
Explanation of "yes" and "maybe" answers:
1. Soils and Geology
(c) Substantial grading is proposed for this project that will
significantly alter the existing topography and ground surface
contour intervals. Slopes will be kept to a minimum, and heavily
planted.
2. Hydrology
(b) Construction will increase the area covered by buildings and
paved areas which will reduce absorption rates, alter drainage
patterns and increase the amount of surface water runoff. The
proposed grading and drainage plan has been designed to direct
water to catch basins in streets that will carry water to water
conservation basin to the south.
(c) Construction of buildings and streets will change direction
of flood waters. In addition to items listed above, improved
drainage courses and pipes will handle water from northerly properties.
5. Population •
(a) The proposed project has an overall density of 5.4 du /ac,
which falls within the low- medium (4 -8 du /ac) range of the General
Plan. However, this is significantly greater than the surrounding
existing residential development on 1/2 acre or greater size lots.
Therefore, the project will change the density and growth rate of
the area. To mitigate this, the project has been designed with
100 - 150 feet of setback from Haven Avenue, and substantial set-
backs around the perimeter. Landscaping will be used to soften
the visual impact of the project.
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations
(a) The land is currently undeveloped; therefore, any residential
development within the General Plan land use density range would be
a significant change to the existing land use.
8. Transportation
(a, b, d, e, f, g) This project will generate increased vehicular
traffic volumes which will effect existing streets and require new
street construction. The project could also impact existing mass
transit or other transportation systems, and potentially increase
traffic hazards. The access to the project from Haven lies north
of the signalized entrance to Chaffey College. Therefore, it is not
anticipated that conflicts would develop between traffic attempting •
to cross Haven Avenue. A landscaped median with appropriate turn
-1-
136
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
• PART II - INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
DATE:
FILING DATE: 4-12!— g Z LOG
-(n-3)
1. E:11'IR0I:DiNTAL IMPACTS
(Exp Jana r ion of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
Sheets) .
YES MAYBE NO
1. Soils and Geology_. Will the proposal have
•
significant results in:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
l
Geologic relationships?
L
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
burial of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface
contour intervals?
d. The destruction, covering or modification
features?
of any unique geologic or physical
e. Any potential increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, affecting either on or off
site conditons?
f. Ciaortes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
v. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
_
h. An increase io the rate of extraction and /Or
use of any mineral resource?
•
2. tlYdrnlnq�•. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
7
13/
P
C
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Changes in currents, or the course of direction
of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream
channels?
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water
runoff?
C.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
d.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
body of water?
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality?
I.
Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
Change in the quantity of groundwaters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
h.
The reduction in the amount of water other-
/
wise available for public water supplies?
�I
I.
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or seiches?
7. Air
Ouality. Will the proposal have significant
results
in:
a.
Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or indirect sources?
/
Stationary sources ":
h.
Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or
interference with the attainment of applicable
air quality standards?
�..
Altaration of local or regionnL climatic
ronilitions, affuctin,; air movement, moisture
or comperacure?
/
flora. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
n. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or number
of any species of plants?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants? L
13
•
•
rage J
YES MAYBE
NO
C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
•
plants into an area?
d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural
production?
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
in:
a. Change in the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numbers
of any species of animals?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
/
to the migration or movement of animals?
_
d. Deterioration,or removal of existing fish or
/
wildlife habitat?
5. Pooulatiun. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
•
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of
the human population of an area?
b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have
significant results in:
a. Change in local or regional Socio- economic
characteristics, including economic or
commercial diversity, tax race, and property
values?
/
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers,
tax payers or project users?
1
7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the
proposal have significant results in?
a. A substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an .area?
_
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives.
•
policies, or adopted plans of ;mv governmental
/
entities?
c. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consumptive or non- consumptitpe
/
recreational opportunities?
_
YES MAYB" NO
C. substantial depletion any nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource?
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitZve periuc r time while long-
term impacts will endure well Into the future).
L
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incremental effects of an •
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects,
and probable future projects).
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
It.
91SC!'SSI0N Or ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to
t11.2 above questions plus: a discussion of proposed mitigation measures).
•
Page 4
YES MAYBE NO
/3�
S. Transportation. Will the proposal have significant
•
results in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement?
b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for
/
new street construction?
,
c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
/
demand for new parking?
_
d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta-
tion systems?
e. Alterations to present patterns of circula-
tion or movement of people and /or goods?
_Z
f. Alterations to or effects on present and
potential water- borne, rail, sass transit or
air traffic? z '
g, Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
/
bicyclists or pedestrians?
_
9. Cultural Resources, Will the proposal have
•
significant results in:
a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological,
/
paleontological, and /or historical resources?
10. Health Safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the
proposal have significant results in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard? _
--
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances in the event of an accident?
d. An increase in the number of individuals
or species of vector or pathenogenic
organisms or the exposure of people to such
organisms?
e. Increase in existing noise levels?
_
f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous
/
noise levels?
__
l
.
„ The creation of objectionable odors?
h. An increase in light or glare?
/3�
C . Page
\ YES MAYBE NO
11. Aesthetics. Will the Proposal have significant
results in:
a. The obstruction or Jegradation of any scenic
vista or view?
/
b. The creation of an .aesthetically offensive
/
site?
C. A conflict with the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
12. Utilities and Public Se:v'ces' Will the proposal
have a significant need for new systems, or
alterations to the following:
a. Electric power?
1
b. Natural or packaged „as?
c. Communications systsls?
d. Water supply?
/
e. Wastewater facilities:
/
f. Flood control struct_:as?
/
g. Solid waste facilities'
h. Fire protection?
i. Police protection?
j. Schools?
k. Parks or other recre ;tional facilities?
1. Maintenance of public :aeilii including
roads and flood con [rr. facillitietie s?
m. Other governmental ssr-rices?
11. Eneri;y and Scarce Resour:e >. Will the proposal
havo significant results :c.
a. Use of substantial �, .- excessive fuel or energy?
6, Substantial increase '- demand upon existing
sources of of energy?
c. An increase in the c.-1nd for development of
new sources of ener --,.
f
d. An increase or perpe:c;tion of the consumption
of non - renewable for; of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of a -ergy are available?
/3(0
•
E
•
Page 7
III. DETEmmrNATION
On the basis Of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
1 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
�I I find the proposed project MAY hwYe a significant alyect on the
u envirnment, and an ENVIRONMENT MPAC PORT is re fired.
Date '
�gnafCr
f Ny1lf� -�
Title
•
•
,, 137
ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10826
•
pockets will further reduce traffic conflicts. Adequate off - street
parking will be provided within the project to reduce the demand
for on- street parking. Additionally, the private streets will be
constructed to City Standard pavement width for a local street.
10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors
(e) The increase in noise levels resulting from this project will
be primarily due to increased vehicular traffic and normal human
activities in a residential area. Noise levels will be temporarily
higher during construction. Setbacks, berming, and dense landscaping
will be used to reduce impacts and decrease noise levels off -site.
•
F_ I
L
-2-
/3$
OEPARMMi OF CpeYIX1tY OEYELWXENi
STABOARD CONDITIONS
subject: PD 82 -03 (TT 10826)
Applicant: Lesny
tae.tian: Between Haven A Hermosa, S/0 Wilson
Those (tens checked are IsMiLions of approval.
APPLICNIT SHAH CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR CW11AKE WIN THE FULLpnAG
CDNDITIONS:
A. Site Develol =nt
X 1. Site styli be developed in accordance with the approved site of... on file
In the Planning Division and the ccII Hans contained herein.
X 2. Revised Sib plans and building elewtions Incarpo -.11, all cpnditlont of
approval shall be --hoisted to the Planning Division pride to I$a ... a of
Wilding penults.
X 3. Approv.l of this request shall not hive tpnplbnce with all ,ti..s or
the Ion IN OrdiMnce and all other 19911 Cable City Ordl malice, In effect et
tine of Building Parch Issuance.
1. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate Sldeynd are. for
Recreation Vehicle storage pue-wnt to City Standards.
S. IF in receptacle areas Shan be enclosed by a 6 fact high wsmuy wall with
vie. obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. location shall W
subject to approval by the planning Division.
X S. A sample of the roof wterlal shall be subni it'd to the Plana l ng Div la loll
for review aM ...rgva prier to I-swnce of Wilding pePit -.
X 2. All roof aPpa,tn ... ces, including .11 SoMltl ... is. shall be archl tetturally
Integrated, shielded free vier and the sound buffered Iron adjacent Pre"ties
P, d streets as eequl red by the Planning and Dullding 0ivglans.
a. prior to any use of the project site ae Wslness ctivtly being conenced
thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shell be coupleled to
the 1.00.1tidn of the Director of Coeunl ty Development.
9 ;histmsraval -bell become null and vole If budding permits .re hot issued
project within one ,air how IN date of Project approval.
10. AS A CoMitin ul Ilse Pnrcit. this project shall intone null and void In
elghtrn+ 1151 nmths from date of approval, unless permits rte issued or
use apprmM 15 mmalebd.
11. A dnb+IlM I+gntlng Pl nn shall be snhniltrd la and aPprnrcd by Ilq Pl nnni nu
Civilian Prinr to Itso.tne( of building pe +mils. wch Plan shall Indicate
style. Ilmmnatlon, location, 'eight and an and or shielding. No light.,
shall adversely affect .dJ111ol or ... rtlea.
X li. All in.nnq opals - installed at the time of Initial develo U.
$olar Placed. p^ <nt Shan he
x 13. Tv,turiled Pedrstrlan palhvays across clrcnlatien aisles shill I`e Iovided
Onau......t the de.elopTnt to connect doellmgs with open $Para$ and
recre,tim+al uses.
]
i •
Project fro.
x IA. All bon pick up Shan be File Individual units .stn an r!:(T.a Iles snieaed
frm public view, if A. centralised trash receptacles are am o.. dad.
_ IS. Standard Patio cover plans Shan be, submitted to am a,P,,.d ty the City
Planner and Building Official prior to ocCewnry of [nn first unit.
JL 16. All build ln9s numbers and Individual wells snail be Identified in • clear
and conclu whaler, fncl Wing proper illtsaination.
i 17. Solid cove eaterice it.,,. shear'[, dead halts and locks .half W Installed
on each unit in this project.
X 16. Security devices such az .iMOU locks shall or installed on each unit.
_ 19. All units within this derelapeene, shall Be, Preli umned to be adapted for A
solar ester passing unit.
X 20. Energy conserving building ma L..... and erdliarce. A , - rr1 Cp t.
incorporated Into this WOject to inclu ^.e such lh+rgsas batlnnt l+ait'd to '
reduced ewtVmptian iMwee Anal(, better grade of ins.IaHOn, double weed
windows, ertended overouNs, pilotless spot..nas. etc.
_ 21. this development Shall provide an option to hmne buyers to Curcl, se A solar
water heating dIt.
X 22. Ecar,huty secondary ac ... a Shan be Provided to this :Fact to the S SS^
faction of the Foothill Fire Protection District, rwwz
23. Local and MSler Planned Equestrian Irons shall M M(vi e•e tn. m,p,v a[ Ve s•I
tract in accordance with Lhe EWestrian Trail plan. A <eta11M a et Vl,n
trail plan indicating wldtle. maumum tl ofez. fnysi<nl L ^n ^R inn0., f... IN
and vend control, In accordance with City eane:tr ?en trait ;te ...us. sW 11
be submitted to and aPPI.sld by the City Planner prior to ant... vat and
recordation of the final map.
21. This tract Snell fare or adder to A ndinteMnC! district far maint,N.ce or
egvettrl.n trail s.
x 25. Street names shalt he reviewed and a —i oven by the city plam.cr, in 011.1dadce
with the adopted Street Naming Policy- rPrior to -For ... I and recordation of
the final cep.
_x 26. IF ibis develannenl intends to rrttr icy eau•rtn.n cr n�1 -,1 r.111M u
to SpeCl (IC in or Prohibit them (n L, re lY. th(n A [dpY or lln C.C. 6 A.,
must be subdl tied to and reviewed by the Caty Planver prior to .pprogl of
final man.
22. This rmirct sea rc_d, FrIt —t cr alfe,,:able hnvsln
rents, in can to.• fete with inn ral Plan + . in i an< dr
nr,trria defined in the Lfoath YA.acnrpn °vL d Cal +C +es end ,1( j, lay
r 1.ttl —inn t nrr�..,- n Armada, q i:y anon
tar the d tr tu.rmt .1 :et .a:r s, tn.II ee
of ire: City tiro atri of 'n e • mill be
a;ry r.(e ' "riot 1. .. -m I. a..cm a
by tar Coy rl annnr prior t Iazvante •ar tu+:e ing rr.Tits.
1_a,k inj a :unit tin. AC �f.s
1. LII pn.k uq Inc tanxre: yd lab am. ... 11 t.....
or 5' a ^a shall contain an If- .Ilk ad+nent to .ul mq stallen .
z. Par"" lot vies shall be a mmun,m It c,n on six.
•
X 3. All -ny I"" widths shall be A minimum Of 26 feet wide. •
X a. finerorney access 11-11 6e Provided, maintenance free and clear, a miuiaxrm
of N leer kid at all titres during construct an in accordance with foothill
FileDistrict rPgurrenents.
_d 5. All Parking spaces stall be double still ped.
6. All units shall An Provided with automatic garage door openers.
_ 2. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked.
_ X D. Ts, Cevenants, Codes and MsirictlOm hall restlict the storage of recreatimmil
vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation
for the owner.
X 9. IID parking shall be Permitted within the interior circulatinn aisle Ct Mr than
In designated vl sitar p., ki., area 5. COVemnts, Code,, and I ...... t inns
shall lie devel.red by the al•pllcant and submitted to the City Planning
Division prior to issuance of but]ding permits.
L"`,,n_4rap1�
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan still] be Submitted to M approved
by the Pl arming Division prior to the issuance of building pksmlts.
2. existing trees shall or retained ehP,,i,r possible. A .,,far Dien of
nistin, trees st heir eir precise location. sine and tvlle shall be
emplaced by the developer. Sold plan shall take let. account the proposed
9-ading, what trees are in be retained, trimmi Tell methods, and where Ter
b es ill be planted for replacement of removed trees. The plan i ".fired
to ta Submitted to and approved by the planning Division prior to approval
If the final grading plan.
X 1 St-eet trees, a mini:mm of 15 gallon site or larger, stall be inaalled in
.000rdance with the Ms,tor Plan of street trees fire the City of manilla
COcamDnga and shall be planted At an average of eery 30' on interior
Streets and 20 On exterior streets.
a. A minimum of 50 trees per gross aCre, eomprlsed of the following sites,
shall be Pr"fded within the development{ 20t -24" box or larger. 70:-15
gallon. and I01-5 gallon.
S. All landscaped areas Holt be maintained in a Maltby and thriving can.
Jitlon, free from weeds, train, antl debrls.
Aleit., Hants in emcess of fire (5) feet I. v,, Ntal height and of 5:1 n r
Teter 1 pe imam be lendscep d and irrigated I cm.dence _th ID pt
p mnU n9 reouireemts of its City .f mc.& (u ca mmn ge. Such slope planting
wall include but rot be Irmited tD rooted ground Cover and Spin, oprsat.
s.rybs and w, es. n11 such planting and irngalins it.) 1 1 runt lnnn.rsly
m to loco m a final Pay and thriving enndiUan by the derrinprr until each
v 141a unit IS sold and otcupied Fy the buyer. Prior to rel ana ... n
.11hpanty for lto le urn t,, an infpectfon of the Slopes snail Fe fc -nle red
by the Planning Sl.Sff to determine that Il Is In 5atlsfactory condltlen.
3. All pa ri.l YS, area .ire ltd land. <aprng 51 a 11 tr ful lv -'l rn t.l r + ^d , A
h- rr ..a rt n•5 <r I, th Ir thr, c•.rrn ettrptlblr• li lhr C. ry. Su -I. prtDl
Of mr art rn,5n[e tNll Le sulrnrlled to the Sit, prior to Issuance of build+.,
I,•ml l t.
A, lire fern! Yazd Iaodtupiog, and An appropriate Sprig Ttehi 5yltrm, still be
Installed by the developer In Itc.rdance .[in Sulmltted plan,.
Prgio rlo. PO a2 -a3
X 9. M fit.) des,gl of the lierimler Par +wsy :, calls, landscaping and Side-
walks shall be Included in the r, d landscape Plant and Shall be
subject ta appmgl by the Planning Division.
10. A min, know of _% Of the trees planted within the project. Small pr.
specimen site trees.
11. 5Pecial landscape features S.in As mounding, alh:vi51 !-C1. ;p.f ^•^n Site
trees, meandering Sldcualkf (both vnrt,c.1 nO hpn font el fx 5e:-PI a..l
intensified landscaping. is rewired .J.,Ha von Av & H rgnosa Ave.
D. Siyne
X I. Ante the CI�Prelwnsive this Ordanan a andxsnal lnregebe .ie rn v and
more
lay the planning Division prior to Instal torten of such sin se approval -
2 Planning 0ivlslan for tials,e .1,k... approval vat P he st;n r t.••E to lxe
Building Pprawl prior to Issuance 01
9 permits.
]L 3. The signs indicated on the sut++itled plans are nit are ... r, with this r
approval and will raga( re separate sign review and .11,I 1
Addstin_1 Arpmvel5 Ree1uf red
_ 1. Development Beview Shall be acconselnnrd prior to tie nwanpe of • villain,
permit.
2- Devmaeopemnt Aevsa, shall be accemphsnPE or,., to recordrtmn Or the fiat
tan map. K
X J. Approval or Tentative Tract lm.l 0 6 grained m >ae<t vo tin, a• vat m7
of- nannmfl ❑nv 1 Pn t�R,
a. this Conditional use forma 11 .ranted inn A raffia Tel ,.,bit) At
unsex tine the Planning Cress"Ieln may add Or de lose Conditions �Oni Or revoke
the Conditional Use Permit.
_ 5. lnm drvel over is required to able.. Re fellonrns sip•nd SL to -r.,t by
purlhallr, If firms which have A private or pubi I, <nuPStr ran trail On N
adjacent to their property.
In Pulthasin0 the home located cn lot i. act
1 have re LO he C. C. 6 R.'s end
undoes nand [twit ze zJ lDt -z zhb•,Ct in a r., :•u 5l mtlPraUl
eas^m+<L sir ire wrpose of':Tibwl ng emex trig ,Sir,, lD
9e1
Signed
5.n4 statpmenl fi to be filed by the da,eleper kith the City prior t0
Pica,. ncY.
-x 6. rvws[n art• -Ter a..] r ....t of r null - -
Inlrlu'sI'r as
:Sur t+ ,v 5nfl n(
La all :p mic e' < ,ot r :L 'll h n• .trnc b
Co ngtf r,IC - t x s4• r n 'r t-••nt pip
kill e•. -„ lr .:! A,, 1. d'tl, t.," r .'�I
I'll', Of ice, ll fllal Cn by a e t.'.n • l'm r5 P..;` tAr r•:[
sr.L r((D1 Lap; ric, to I, final rep la�rv.,SI: D�• o•r M r ugh..
dr.,n of nap or n5u+nce or ppa+ts in :M se Or all of xnr
projects.
rnsSMntAa1
g.
Prior to approval AM recordation of the final Mo. Or prior to the Issuance
tf
of building Pen ulrn as ART, Is Involved, +Millen mrUn<.tion trod the
Affected VA ter district, (bra[ edMlia le sewef and wat,, fatilili!( Ate or
will be a.Ail able to serves the protases Project, 111-1;1 M subni(led to bbe
Me'lln",t Of Clnnmity Mrcl OlnecnL Such Idler Ault Ixee Mtn issued by
tin• water district within slaty (60) days prior to final wan al•pmwl to
the case Of subdivision Or issuance of permits In the case Of All Oth,,
residential projecb. for P,.Jens using septic tank facilities Alto. ble
by the Sent. An, Aegi snot 11 11, Control Child and the City, n'It(ea
certification of Aeteplability, including all supm,ti,e iatinne uM, shall
he obtained And suMitted to the City.
_ 6.
This approval shell bacon, null dad void if the ten Gtive nn4facie, nap
Is not 411AIIl aid r ,,.,I'd Or building MnAits issued olden n nap I s
Involved. within twelve 112) Conth, trop the Approval of this project
unless An e,thr,w has been granted by the Fla ,, Commission.
_ 9.
This SuMPolsion was not submitted w a total devel.,anot Package end 13
required to reapply For a point rating relative to the design section of
the rrputh nanagenant ordinance prior to final approval AM recordation of
the nap if the subdivision Is going to ha developed as tract leaves.
�N9lItAW
SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COIPLIAICE Mills THE F%LPIIMG
COHDITIOUS:
F. site nelelcy rat
X 1.
The areticent shall comply with the latest adanted Unifom 8filding Cade,
Ural Form 14chaniul Code, Unit., Pluabing Code, DeticMI Electric Code, led
all other applicable codes .nd ordinances in effect Al the cloy of Issuance
Of relative Pewits.
X Z.
Prior to Issuance OF building permfts for casbustible construc[ief. evidence
shall he submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that Ldephury ate,'
supply for fire protection is available. Funding completion or required
fir, protection Systems.
�( 3.
Poor to the Issuance of a bu a Id ing permit for . new re3taen ti AT dealt inq
unit(S) or Mine addition to an e.isting unit(s), the applicant shall pay
develoralut fees at the established rate. Such fees My include. bra not
be lw\ted to: City BeautfllutlOn Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Onallalrent Fee, Peralt and Plan Checking lees, and Scroll Fees.
A.
Prior to the issuance of A building PCwfL For A nor com+erclal or industrial
develalman[ ar aMiti.. to an e.isting d.velopavnp the Applicant shall Pay
de..I.reenL FIII at the Ast.blithed rate. such ices may include, but not
be )failed to: Systrns Develvpeena Fro, Draln.ge Fee, Permit AM Plan
Checking Fees.
XS.
Street add,,,O, Shan be p,."old by the building Official.
6.
C:el l ing nits :lull be ,strutted Ili th fire retardant material and non -
m'n+subie Ilan, mnrY+ei
3.
All < d_.Ilims ITI have chi building e1CrAUnn elu::g the a e ^t
/. n r
•1 u,th el•: Ilion I w-:d trim AYOUod w,ndh +s And Ilion siding o, planl-
Or.:...r 11,";.late.
I•,i, .rag
;t.nrty.
1.
P 0o- < ml.. Ili u. u. ie,fe.. D.nd:mg Ca inr I•: illy lu ❑ea. A..na
+tea
<hatla-rleg a , a•a ri re -r.: it rrrae\: of rail ba) roils ing ae
2.
G.rti_g Lad l.iing(al '.In 11 nn n c tO cr.,, r. o. a m:t n.d [n b.l alai
ton :nq reg.,lac¢ns rot 11-e intended .1 ar the 1•u il.bag a ll :m ntnnH LLni.
E+1101.1 ;r, w• d6pa O1 facilities dull b. 10-'del, 1111.1 n...l :. +r capped
10 ct.rly with the Unfimm Plurbing Cede, add Vuifmm Puilding Coda .
0
Wogece ::o. PO 02 -03
x. wading
I. rnadinn of the soh. :ct vmrerry ;111 ne in mrJae" with ton gr.<mn
Building Code, Eity Grading SLandads and accn,T,d yading cra tt acts. lha
final grading plan 51411 be in Sub3tential eonfatFanle with The Approved
Conceptual
grading plan. -
x 2. A soils report shall be PreNr<a by A cmliffld engineer licensed by the
State of California W perform I'll work.
1. A geological report shall [e Pr¢yer[d Ill a duel,fi•d en0 ane•r cr geolo9l {t
and lobo Rtad at the tic¢ of ducal gets 0n for gracing plan coca.
X a. The final i.a9l rag plan shall t^ sut,. t .. tell.,. and A,prn'vAl by the
Grading Ccmnittee and shall L. c-'-,Ie4 -d prior in avrde wn Of tie fi,yl
suMivision map Or Issuance of bu,ld,eg tt—It ushictmvnr Ices fa-sl.
S. A. a custom-lot iota ivi sfw, the falle.ang rwuireme„ts shall he met.
A. Surety s1.e11 be posted a +< an doll. rot a ^cuV.d, yu rail V.In9 ro- cal <tim,
of ell nn -site do ln.ge rec illuel ne�essay tin de.nte.ing all parses),,
to the s. I fact ton of the Build,,, and Safety Di risen.
b. A,+ prior +ate easements, fl' ;If, 415fcse1 Of •J Ya,n \'a ..atilt ills are
r-Matted pet. or Over e4jaE t 1,,all. a e to be del ,nrroa and
ec.,d<d to the latisf¢uvn of the euilding and Surety D :v,il+n.
c. fin -s to dean :am lrorav n.., ., a ay c r ! .,t^.Ing Or p,ct<tt•ng
tl. uodiviaed rr -rrco.', ie a t0 le , tailed ^p,act [d -•0 of
bull ding peraits for uctaa -roil any Fa, ml end; , scar subject
to, or contr,tutes to, dreimco na.ro en terse;, 1,1 ,7 or within a
parcel relative to which A Ea it c,rg " "it is tea. ^s vG.
d. llwl grading flans far .ch Far. rl a.n H b^ ..dolt Ills (e if, On, Ving `\
ant Se fety C,r,siou far e. n:al p.mr to a ua -c of bu'l'ling permit{, y
Ilh I may be as An iacre +nbl a tin I..,it. s. as is�) `
A. All sir,. -arks an eat=s; of if" (5) fret m .al a gilt and rr
5:1 Or greater sIODr shell is 1e•drJ wain nati.n
of gYAJing or star other Ott• - , -tale rn [t:! of .. -.aril . f.l still
to cO•rt ^tad to t ^.e saNarde,or - h¢ Cu:le\':T Ill CSa;. 'r.:yaLnn
shall i:e Frei irl to .•+- "Vie tl :e `seed en: :nalnta :n gve.th to A polo[
6 months after m9tfoa.
APPI IEAMT SHALL CONTACT THE EIIGI:r!E0.IN; UI_Str^ FOP, col"'o'J!i �ItN iuE fritC :inG
COODITTONS. - --
1. Ded i ca [lone and__ehiarlpr .:t -•a
1. eMicallnns abtll M..101 by •tall If an .•
...ct r gnts-
of-way end .II ne..•v y e: s„- ^. :;- at anm.^ co an....,:tab
_ 2- nO•to,b on 1,.,, t<r„d<• of tie •m la...T r ..ea _ay On ue rot tewlry
so eats:
t • -,
__ 1. Inn f p.:-; ..1, 1-�,.• .ad sys uli t v . [:., � ,
__A. ell „- rr r•n�o.ly i -ri'. sail a "!. .._ � .a. i:.
5. LI Is If `., 'alt
_ .r ,11 ru.Nn
ia. f., n lmrJ on
[I.e r'JP Cr SF.J 11 -[^ rr_ornei « -- w�•b,ct - e
^ ra:.
•
J.
SI BE[t flfJ {[
CII V.1 -F
CUTTER
•
-6-
Gate yrpvlsiws shall by wade for the Ingress, egress And Internal
LIg11S
OVERLAY
circulation of any trucks Which will b used for delivery of goods u
Haven
the property or In the operation of the proposed business.
X T.
P,"Ite drainage usrmfnts for cross -lot drainage shall be required
X
X
and shall b delineated or raticed de the final map.
—6.
Ail edstin9 Aswan[, lying -(thin future righoof-way are to u
X
qu ltclaSamd cur to be delineated on the Yp per City Engineer's re9uiremnts.
X
X 9.
Eastaanu far sidewalk for public uses shall be dedicated to the City
where sidewalks meander through private property,
Street ImP.ovements-
_ I.
Construct full street improvements. including• but not limited to.
Curb and gutter, A.C. Oerenent, sidewalk, drive appro¢ha,, "k..y
tract and street lights On Ili interior streets.
2.
A eloteam er 26 -fool wtoo pavement within a 10 -root wide dedicated
right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - Section streets.
-L S.
Construct the fallowing missing Improvements including, but not
limited to:
SI BE[t flfJ {[
CII V.1 -F
CUTTER
A.
PVl{1.
WALK
ACPR.
LIg11S
OVERLAY
•I I.tTA'I
15LNN OILIER
Haven
eand
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
•lacludea landsupiny and trrlyetlen an Msaw-
X 1. prior to any work being performed In the Public right -of -war. fees
shall b paid and an encraaciment permit shall be obtained from the
City Engineer's Office, in Addition to any ether Well, required.
X S. Street Linear ment puns approved by the City Engineer and Prepared
Cy A Aaglatered Civil Englread r she II be required. Car all street
Improvements, Prior to I....... of an eI .... Chalet Permit. final
Plans and Profiles shall show the I.oelse Of all e.btin9 utility
facilities within the right-of-away.
- X 6- Surety snail be pestle and an agrerminnt e,ecuttd tO the ,atll LACLion
er the City En9inver and the City Attorney. guaranteeing ca.plclion
of the Public Irgvovrmentt. Prior to recording of the Mp or the
Issuanca of to ding Perm, [5, -hicMVer comes first.
_ X j. All Slrtet imp- ov"ents Shall be Installed to the fatisfactiom of the
City t °9 inr tt, Prior to e<cupancY.
X6. I'll —It tbilo.,, «ling, tneli, end n•ml r signnng shall he
1-1111lrl par the -1-1- - . rn.v r the C11, Ingm.er.
9. [.tttinq city role rrnvirirt rrnnstruction siall •rr nn or^n Fnr
trallie .t all ti'r^t -it" d „what, d.•toefs durin.l epni In •rCtipn. A
call, drfaiit INII be rr•ltved to to ", the met of gr,d,a and
Paving, wh,,h shell he ref.,od nn Co pletian of the eoont... Lion to
the Salildetlan Of the City Englneee.
4
R10i ad. PO 82-0,
X 10. Walsways shall be provided between public sidewilki and on -site
pedestelas adt.
It. Crncentrated drainage flaws snail ant <rn.. ... ...... Under sfdewalk
dralns shall be insulted to city st +nd+rds.
_ 12. An energy dl st ..afor and /or ere,; •n too .'I A "" 's eau n n
Fe In+ed
to the Satisfaction of the City Engineer. It the ,end of Stab 51,e•La.
A letter cf acceptance of drainage riva l flow the downs[.... property
Owners shell be required.
X. gralnav6 •red Elood lee cant
J. 1. The applicant will be responsible for e."trud,ti n of all on -site
drain... I•CnlUes r flair -d by the City Engineer.
Intee,ection drains x111 be required at the following lautlws:
_ j. Tile PrOPASed project falls vi cur a indicstn4 As so."'t I,
flooding under the Ustion.I Floe,, In^vrae:e Pre]rne end ,9 subject to
tae provisions or tbt PI-Vr - e•W City lldnn.,,v 'l,. 11.
X 1. A drainage channel -We' flco•1 "-1— Hell will hr rrl.lf-Cd to
Protect the ttru, W... by diverting sb,et runoff to Sir, s, or to
stern d1IN.
-,- S. Adequate previsions Shall be meat far a o'paere and or
surface dr.ina9e ante leg he prnnnrty raw diapnzal ...acr..r -111
_
X 6. Letter er ec<ep Lance from dnwntt•ea:n ...PrtY c.n ^n sM 11 4 regefre6
Nrcre reaO.rl --fall the tract fle -s Onto privy Le pro, ^rt it L.
x r. HeYmOSa seal) to era grtd as rejC, .r r carryny .
streets a - vrni'natirn of 'e—'al
V liIlse and /orpianwseaoea earth Seeing • end n rolled t eri.e,ays ac prefer ty
ne.
the follo -ang stern drain shall bra ie:t.111d to tb. atiif.c tl.. cur
the City Endinaern
Y SEE RESOLUTI011
•y 9. frier to recordation of the oar. • M.0 e- <, le ny.yn+o:nc aW d•. n�qe
ttuer far the project SMII be i- h"tied to th. Illy Engineer for
review.
M it le.rt
1 I'r ^r l, . all il-
wl e e... . c gnstat nl re -. rn' •" - - +n•IarY cur•. rx,
All ntdi Utt.�En. t:e
rn 1. ,.Ine ntrllt r .... r ;.', ' end
Toil icy r • vats s.,II Y fan
.. . tti n. c r fry
_), 1. Ce. N dfrc Stall he rr;;onsrbl, In ,tie trio atnn err kt'ng fuM4
vtl fitaeq a rr (oar H. r
--)L [ ^vael ,Fill Ie mr mLt” fc, :•. ry at t l letrrn r tt•r•t li ;a l•1
in c re.... erh Sl-.thern Ca l.I . Fuson C -: n.y ,ra Coy nda•e..
cur p,
' ±J
V
prolKt Amyl) R7 -03
6. Va Wr And 11.11 clans 'ball be dnsigura And rnnuructed to wml
raryirtments of the CYCAawsga county Water Witriet JCCWD). f ^ntnnl
Fire District and the Enritanaent' NeAI [n Deparluent of 4rc [watt)
of San Aermrdinn. A letter of camp.... from CDID will be reau{red
wiar to rfcordatlbn.
7. APProv111% We Age bcen sl,ured fr. all uWil.cl AM ptN, inlefasted
agencles inralved. Approval f the final "I will be s.bJeCt to any
rcaulrements that my N recelved items Item.
M.. 6enerAl 0.egvlrmnb_And ApProrAli
4- 1. Pettalts Alga ether agencles will Y required As follows:
A. salt..... . (or: _
D. C..nuty matt Al. liacnt jregYlietl prTor_ io isaiiarice of_.
q.a.linq "..")
C. Ln Dernerdina County flood Control District
D. Dlher:
Z. A wy of the Carenants, conditions and Aeslrictions (C.C. 6 A.'s)
and Articles of Incorpora NOn of t. xweowwrs Assoc Ntion, subject
to the appro val of the City Attorney, SMII M retarded with th1S mp
'�. and • copy provided to t. City.
X D. final parcel And tract .01 sA< w.fmm to City standards and
procedures.
_ a. A pArco) mp sNll be recorded Prior to first phase subdivisiw to
"gent C... than o /YnfK09nlild wrcll'.
X S. Prior to rec.,WAIA. a boLJCt of Intention to farm and /or Jain
Nndscape and Lighting Districts 0.111 be filed with the City C ... cll.
the engineering costs lAYOlved in District formation Shall be borne
by the developer,
X 6. All Perimeter l.ndscaped wrn.ays an rraulr<e to be AM.A,Ad in... the
l ands.. pe Minlemnce district.
X y. Nnd'caying AM irrigation systems required to be, installed no pubs it
righbef.uay w the perimeter of this tract Area still be Continuwsly
maintained by the derelcar until accepted by the City aM Annexed
into the Nndst&N maintenance district.
5
1
1
1
1
June 5, 1982
Department of planning
City of Rancho Cucamonga •
c/o `.ake Varin
9320 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga, California
SUBJECT: Havenwood Planned Development by Lesney Development Co.
Dear `!r. Varin;
After meeting with Mr. Allan Lowy of Lesny
Development Co, and Mr. H. Ernest Reynolds of Reynolds
Environmental Groupto review the proposed Havenwood
Planned Development, it is a pleasure to be able to
congratulate both the city planning dept, and the developers
on a job well done.
As you are well aware from the many appearances
of Deer Creek Ho^eowners Assc. Board 'Me^.ibers at numerous
city planning commission meetings, we continue to be very
concerned that the new developments that are built within
our general area reflect the same care in planning that
the city and developers put into the Deer Creek development.
At many times the the past years it may have
seemed that we were opposed to any development in our area
such as the proposed Havenwood complex, we are not. we have
been waiting for some developer to recognize that multi - family
housing in the form of condo's and single family housing can
be compatible when well planned. •
Our only concern is in the traffic area. There
was some discuession that there would be no left turn lane
at the entrance on Haven directly across from the college.
That instead of a left hand turn lane, traffic would be routed
up to Haven and Wilson to make a U -turn back down Haven and
then to enter the complex from a right hand turn. I would
like to re• %',ind you that Haven and Wilson is a dangerous place
to ?ake a U -Turn do to the fact that the roll in the grade
at that point makes it impossible for a car traveling south
on Haven from north of Wilson to see any car coming north
on '.laven untill it is completly in the intersection.
Please feel free to contact me for any additional
infor: ;ation you may need.
Yours Truly:
Il; ' Y Iz n� •�1..
CITY Of RA.WCNO CUCAPAOf1GA `
Cor,iIINIumTYOEVC1opMENTDFPT, Roy Schauben
President Deer Creek Homeowners Assc.
!Uid P F M2 11023 Wilson Ave.
AM rM Alata Loma, Calif. 91701
'7t8�Ud7illfg�fl�2fSp1151G
ivy
• ORDINANCE NO. /77
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
201 - 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63, 65 AND 69, LOCATED BETWEN
HAVEN AND HERMOSA AVENUES, APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET SOUTH
OF WILSON, FROM R -1- 20,000 TO R- 2 /P.D.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION l: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
• C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63, 65
and 69, approximately 57.7 acres in size and generally
located between Haven and Hermosa, approximately 660 feet
south of 14ilson, is hereby changed from R- 1- 20,000 (Single-
Family Residential - 1/2 acre lots) to R- 2 /P.D. (Two Family
Residential /Planned Development).
SECTION 3: The Mayer shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Cle:,t: shalt cause the same to be published within fifteen (15' days
after i y s passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982.
AYES:
•
• HOES: •
ABSENT:
/y5
r
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
w,
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: VACATION OF CERTAIN EQUESTRIAN EASEMENTS WITHIN TRACT 9440
BACKGROUND: A petition to abandon the above - mentioned easements was
submitted by twenty -eight (28) of the forty -bne (41) homeowners within
this tract. These property owners object to these easements primarily
because horses are not permitted within this subdivision. Secondly, these
property owners object to motorcyclists using these easements causing fre-
quent noise disturbances. Tract 9440, Exhibit "A ", consists of 45 half acre
lots (41 have been built) located on the west side of Hermosa, between Banyan
ana Wilson. Each lot has a 20 or 25 foot equestrian easement along the
rear property line, as shown on Exhibit "B ".
The City Council adopted Resolution 82 -97 on June 2, 1982, setting the
date for public hearing on July 7, 1982. Subsequently, a petition
from homeowners within the tract was submitted to request postponement
of the public hearing to August 11, 1982. Notices of hearing to vacate
the easements have been posted at the site and mailed to surrounding
property owners.
The equestrian easements were required as a condition of approval by
the County, and were recorded with the final tract map. Therefore,
abandonment of the easements requires approval by City Council, which
has jurisdiction over the recorded map. Copies of the petitions and
a Resolution authorizing the vacation of certain easements have been
attached for your review and consideration.
ANALYSIS_ The major issue is the effect that the proposed vacation
would have on the Master Plan of Trails adopted in the General Plan,
Exhibit "D ". The proposed abandonment must be found consistent with
the General plan trail policies. According to the City Attorney, where
Local Feeder Trail easements provide access to the Community Trail
system, any abandonment may be inconsistent with the General Plan.
Further, the General Plan policies listed on Exhibit "E" encourage the
type of easements which are proposed to be eliminated. Approval of this
abandonment may set a precedent for future abandonments which could
affect the integrity of the Master Plan Trail System.
141
Vacation of Certain Equestrian Easements
City Council Agenda .
• July 7, 1982
Page 2
As shown on Exhibit "C ", Tract 9440 is bordered on the east by the exist-
ing Community Trail along Hermosa. Also shown are surrounding approved
tracts with Local Feeder Trails which will connect with subject easements
in Tract 9440. The easements located along the northerly and southerly
tract boundaries will provideaccess to the Community Trails for Tract 9440,
and surrounding tracts.
The primary reason listed in the petition is that the CC &R's prohibit the
keeping of horses. The easements are defined by the CC &R's as being for
the use of animals, pedestrians, and service vehicles. Although horses
are not permitted with the subdivision, the CC &R's may be amended by a
majority of the property owners to permit horses or other animals that
could use the easements. The petition cites two reasons which seem to
be associated with only the easements along the south boundary of the
tract: nuisance and indiscriminate use of the easement to gain access to
the flood control basin. People are using the flood control basin to
ride motorcycles and dump trash. The basin is unenclosed with many points •
• of access. The use of the trail for access to the basin could be mitigated
through construction of limited barriers at trail entrances.
EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE: The northerly and southerly easements in
\, Tract 9440 provide an important east /west linkage between the Community
'C Trails and the Alta Loma Channel and along Hermosa. Therefore.. the
Q\� Equestrian Advisory Committee primarily recommends retention of all eques-
V train easements in said tract. In the event that the City Council wishes
to seek a compromise, the Equestrian Advisory Committee recommends the
retention of those easements on lots 1 -9 and 31 -38 would be appropriate
in order to maintain the continuity of the trail system.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review and consider
a1 mat-1 eri'Tnd input relative to the General Plan Trail policies, the
Equestrian Advisory Committee input, and the input of those residents listed
on both petitions. Attached is a Resolution to vacate certain equestrian
easements should the Council find it appropriate to do so. Also, the City
Council may wish to postpone the public hearing on this item until a later
date as per the request of the property owners on the petition dated
June 12, 1982.
i
Respectfully submi ted,
• JACK LAM, AICP •
Director of Community Development
JL:OC:jr
Attachments
1`17
s
c•
I
Anril 27, 1962
Cit.: Cou:•cll
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 aasellnE Road
Rancho Cuca -onSa, Ca 91701
potltlon to Abandon the Equestrian Easement for Tract 9440
The he- eowners of Tract 9440, City of Rancho Cucamonga, whose sig-
naturFs arrear on the attached letter, hereby petition The City
Council of Rancho Cucamonga to an ^rove the abandonment of the 20
Equestrian Sqs ^ -ents of Tract 9440. This petition is filed purs-
uant to the Declaration of Restrictions for Tract 944 d 0 filed-
the Ccunty of San Bernardino in Book 9569, Pate 1249.
Tits recuest is made because of the followine.. facts:
1. co- eo•,'ners of; Tract 9440 are not nernitted to maintain
hors =s or. their property pursvent to the above, mentioned
covenants.
2. The easements are used by individuals on motorcycles as a
me:+.rs of access to the flood control basin which borders
the south side of Tract 9440. This is a ccnstart problem,
which crates a cereral nuisance often requiring the assist-
•
ance of law enforcement.
•
3. The ee.se -ert is ured for access to the flood control basin
by individuals wishing to dung trash. There have been
eco ^.slots when rerrle have been observed to bring oicku^
tructrs loaded with tre.sh do�•rn the case ment and exlt er. ty.
4. Sires the hn:rep,rrers carrot use the easement for arty pur-
^ e there is no incentive to ralnt.9ln the es.se ent weed
fr ^e, and it therefore .ecores a nutsnnce In and of Itself.
5. is ^.e e-sement provides, indiscri 'ninate access to the rear
c: the ho-^s bordorinc the ^aise-ent. This access creates
n high ltkelihood of Ourrlar,, and theft to those hones.
• T %e ;;eirhbnrhood 'latch *rorram cannot acti,,ely !fork :fIth
thin, -crew bec•Aure it is to the r ^r of the hones.
tt;, th1l. Tetltlon ^1c- ftrd the s1,,ngt.ures of ^.e h ^se-
a'•^ ^t' :r-ct 5s aell a rap and r.hotogrsrhs.
Cr
V..rs. Lon va'cnnd
714- r. ?C -;r25
I "rs. Sidnev Crabtree
1or09 Coca Ave.
Alta Lora, Ca 91'01
714 -080 -2412
kl$
•
April 27, 1982
City Couroll
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baselln6 Road
Rancho Cucamonga, Cs 91701
Frtltion to Abardcn the Equestrian Easement for Tract 9440
The ho-enwners of Tract 9440, City of Rancho Cucamonga, whose slg-
raturss appear on the attached letter, hereby petition The City
Council of Rancho Cucamonge to an ^rove the abandon -ent of the 20
Eocestrlan ERs° -ents of Tract 9440. This petition is filed purs-
uant to the Declaration of Restrictions for Tract 9440 filed- with
the County of San Bernardino in Book 9569, Face 1249.
Tr1s reouest is made because of the following factss
1. Fo- eo,aners of. tract 9440 are not per -lttad to maintain
hors =s on their property cursvant to the above mentioned
covenants.
2. The easements are used by individuals on motorcycles as a
:^,ears of access to the flood control b,..sin which borders
She sou L1 +. aide of Tract 9440. This is a ccnstart problem:,
•
whit: or-sates a general nuisance often requiring the assist-
•
arse of law enforcement.
j. The as.se -act is used for access to the flood control basin
by individuals wishing to dump trash. There have been
occaslons when renple have beer. observed to bring pickup
trucks loaded with trash dorm the easement and exLt empty.
4. Since the hom.eo^rers rnrrot use the ease^ent for ar.,v pur-
^ e there is ne ircen!lve to maintain the easy ent weed
frre, and It therefrre 'r-ec�res a r-utronce In and of itself.
5. T: ^e easement prmrides, tndlscri inite acr•.ecs to the rear
of the he -es borr'ertng the ^ase- nt. This access creatas
R hl ?h 11kr11hood of burelary and theft to those horec.
• The Pleirhborhood latch !'rcmrar. cannot activrly work with
this -crenr bet• +use It is t;; the rear of the hones.
3rnU :� :�d ••t t :a t:^.ln - ,titlon rte ^tom fird the si,tvatures of the h ^me-
..-. _!'rr of Tr ^.ct ^t:•4.^,, is •,roll s n mar and nhntogr= hs.
-
Crntoct.
?.rs. Lon ua'oand 1 rs. Sidne}: crabtrpe
1CC7c _q•, Avg 3or0g Coca Ave.
A1:a • L n, Cn�91701. Alta L•^. -a, Ca 91'01
714 -9.9C -1925 714 -980 -2412
•
•
if
ly $
-
i
t•
r
n:orch 7, 1 ^82
-1,n•.1rg Division
-- r :r1t;- De•relobcer.t Depart -ent
-1t_ of rcho Cucar ^n. +a, CF
Dcar
517s
Tre ••.rd =rsigned o.m ers of lots nu-hered 1 -34 and 39_45
-act =440, in the City of Rancho Cucsronaa, hereby petltlnn
rcr the removal of the 20 foot Fouestrt. =.n E'Serent which
borders the 5 ^.rth of e•.cn of th °se nu-bered lots.
517ne the owners of all lots In Tract 044C are rrchiblted
free ralntaining horcas or. their prorerty, this Equestrian
Easerent Is not nece5s ?ry to the en]r.;, -ert of that property.
We therefore request that the Flanrir? Division take what -
e.er ste -s are necessary to rrrove this Equestrten EasFner.t.
Thnn;r you f ^r your assistance in ti'ls - otter.
T^,ct C -u -b er 9440 (' A
Lot Fu-ber 1 /17- /1rf4,,7/ ^�• Date
vY^•:n �+.r + :'z :�`�? Date. 7 1O L_
Lot 2 (;'`�;�% ._ 7 e y Dot=
Late 3/•I�A.2.
Lot ....rb ^r 3 P, ` Date
Date.
�LGi.c .'J1• �.GGb��t' D�tP, ,J/ / / U Z
Lot ;iu., r,:•r 5 .LLZLt� c'. , Date '
Lot :'u ^be,r b �� -I, .fcl•.�G Date .5 1711f,12_
........._.. ...... _. .'... ..
r •
,
0
•
4
j
•
Y Lot ?'u7 ^ -r
X Lot ?:urt =r 11
• k Lot ]2
Lot ::u -cr•r lj
IC-
Lot ;:u-`. ^r 14
G "
Lot ';u- r. =••. 15
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
pate y -�_rz
Date tl -1-`i2
Date �%'�.'�•
Date
Date
�7
•
•
15T .. ,',..
Lot ':u -ner ?
Date
n
Dete
Lo *. *'v °ber A ...g�i -'
Date
C;y / ;t l,4
Da tP,
Lot ?'u -o -r ^ - Ir `� �C GJtiY
Date
..�- %' •�•�
1 r
Date
Y Lot ?'u7 ^ -r
X Lot ?:urt =r 11
• k Lot ]2
Lot ::u -cr•r lj
IC-
Lot ;:u-`. ^r 14
G "
Lot ';u- r. =••. 15
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
pate y -�_rz
Date tl -1-`i2
Date �%'�.'�•
Date
Date
�7
•
•
15T .. ,',..
J
x Lot Su -,ber 16
C �
Date
Date
X T-ot 6ur.bor 21 Dete
Date
Lot tiur'o <r 22 D?te
D?te
Lot ruc' -rr 23 De to
D ?tr
Lot Nu-ber 211Z�.�.�.- f���.,(?,- r'tivl�[z�. Dote
Dote
Lot 25 Date 3 L f 52-
_
Data —,3r .t 2/
r5 i
`1
Pi
•
Lot \urber 1)' --i[ t+ -,.Ci Dote
I
D.ste,
3/ S
Dote
Lct Nurbar 18
/
C���, ,, , ;, �,�, :'�; �-�\ Dote
•
Lot >'u -.ter 19
Lot :iu -.ber 20 IA Dote
-t- Date
3-3/-2
X T-ot 6ur.bor 21 Dete
Date
Lot tiur'o <r 22 D?te
D?te
Lot ruc' -rr 23 De to
D ?tr
Lot Nu-ber 211Z�.�.�.- f���.,(?,- r'tivl�[z�. Dote
Dote
Lot 25 Date 3 L f 52-
_
Data —,3r .t 2/
r5 i
`1
Pi
•
Lot S ^irbmr 25
0
DpLte A47 2 L7Z
Date
Lot Nu-ber 27 Date
Date
a
Lot Yucber 2E q.�M22�r'1C,..., Date
-/
Date
Lot i:u -.ter ,�,�- n.y ,(D i Date
c3�.3 /-gam
D ^te
Lot ?:urb °r 31 Iz M1524 /' lil4 at e
3- 3 /-.•YZ
Date
• Lot ?:u -b -r 30%' f la ¢' _Date
•3 -
�n
Lo. Nu-b�r �:� /tea u to
Date
Lot ;:u-b,r ?3 Date
Dnte
Lot ::u---[;r 34 Date,
Date
• Lot :"u -b ?r 3:' / 4- , t�l /�/Cn��. ^ %�I"LLtJL-tr.- .l'�J�
/y
lJ
I1
U
•
•
/ nn r
Lot :. __�.: °r 4(; y/4 Date
Date.
Lot :'u-be, '�l w Date Z—
a u� Date
Lot :•:u -.ber 42
Dgte
Date
Lot ::u-be.r 4y Date ^$�
Date
Lot ::u-ber 43 .l� /y. �� Date .3 ��-
G� Date ? vt
s X75 �7/t ;; /P T
Lot :, u o late
fl
/S3
•
L
•
r
•�.�� _ :;. ter:— ?Tti�;'_�cr::f�3..;q �.
y <<
C0.t.n bY11 14
i y
0
V% L, OS-$ �ermoSA
C, e 1 i-ef` 'O; A-m r-+
Ic
•
0
r
June 12, 1982
The Hon. Jon D. Nikels, Mayor
CITY 0? RANCHO CJCA N:ONGA
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Re: Intent to vacate certain equestrian easements
within Tract 9440.
Dear Mayor Mikels:
The undersigned individuals represent a group of home-
owners living within. tract 9440 who oppose the
abandonment of our equestrian easements.
At the June 2, 1982 City Council meeting this item
ar ^eared on the Agenda /consent calendar' D.
It is scheduled for public hearing on July 7, 1982.
'•;e are requesting that this item be re- scheduled to an
early Aucust hearing date. This will allow us to pre-
pare z proper and meaningfull presentation to support
our position and reiterate the importance of maintain-
ing all designated equestrian easements within our
area.
Thank you very much for your attention to this request!
Very truly yours,
Mr. 2 firs. Hans J. Petersen
5954 Dartnouth Ave.
Alta Loma, Ga. 91701
(714) 989 -3077
Mr. & Vies. Paul LOGrasSO
596a;'15a'rtmouth Ave.
P/ita T, ma, Ca. 91701
T /14)AS7- 60p_�'_/7
J.:�etersen
Cohen
6:.�'��
P_ul oG ^so 1 ,
\
P.o bent eo .F.ar�u"'
Mr. & Mrs. Saul Cohen
5938 Dartmouth Ave.
Alta Loma, Ca. 91701
(714) 987 -7224
yr. Robert Leonhart
5969 Dartmouth Ave.
Alta Loma, Ca. 91701
(714) 989 -1630
LI
L
n
U
0
0
L
NORTI I
0
CITY OF ITE-Al: �°1�40 •
RANCI X) CUCANIONGA TITLE: InrA_ D AAAP
PLANNING DIVISION L\l11111T:�SCAI,E:T -rc'
/-)6
31 4 32 34 37 3q,
3S,., 4
-z �(
29 29 2�, 26
ag
i zoo
...... ......
24 ro, 41
iii 14 15
42
:3 "w.
23 .M
Lai 41
12 17
:i
j.: 22 qm fA?K%AY P h.1 L
ItAl
44
21 gj L
10 19 ',"Z,
20
110
sivul D
6-1 Sr 4
NORTH
CITY OF -rr,4-'-T 944c
• Ik'-\'NC"o CUC'�"IONGA Til•Ll:: -P ACT MAE
PLANNING DIVISIO.N MINIM P; ' SC,%I,I::
)S7
Q7
C
w.i r,•c
MASTER PLAN
OF TRAILS
TRAIL SYSTEM
— EXISTING COMMUNITY
-- PROPOSED COMMUNITY
1.O J •U G U• U O'O'L'>t}l.O, U' U F7: V �i.••••u•••u••••wt� -0 O U' ,O
y.•ery;•••N.•s•••o0'0' O O-(
o O. o ¢ o
O 7. O O
O O O Y1 O
,pO x O
: =, O.
O' • O 1
1 ^.
Ey
11 1
.. w
a 67'
CITY or ITr.%I: —�.,�T/�reed 64x40
• RA\CI K) CUCAMONGr1 TITLE; MAInR, �( e�Tr'1�`i►�
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT— �SCALI
/sc -
.'.rte• �'�% _i'11:
- Q':
V �l
NORTH
CITY or ITr.%I: —�.,�T/�reed 64x40
• RA\CI K) CUCAMONGr1 TITLE; MAInR, �( e�Tr'1�`i►�
PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT— �SCALI
/sc -
•
,•
0
EXHIBIT "0"
EXCERPTS FROM GENERAL PLAN TRAIL POLICIES
Whenever possible and feasible, the City shall require that all
residential lots in the equestrian /rural area have Local Feeder
Trails on the rear of the lot.
Require that all development within the ( "equestrian /rural ") area
relate to existing and future areas occupied by equine, bovine,
cleft - hoofed animals and poultry by providing trail connections
through easements in order to connect disconnected trails and for
needed access to recreation activities.
3. The City should promote programs for improving existing trails
such as removing existing barriers on trail systems to make the
trails safer, more functional, and accessible to adjacent trails.
4. The City shall establish a Master Trail System which provided for: •
- Regional Multi- Purpose Trails which connect
to regional recreation areas, residential,
commercial, and industrial areas.
- Community Trails which connect residential
areas, local activity centers, and the re-
gional shopping center and the Regional
Multi- Purpose Trails system.
Local Feeder Trails which connect individual
residential lots to the Community and Regional
Trail system.
/s y
•
• RESOLUTION NO. S) -IIg
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING, THE VACATION OF CERTAIN
EQUESTRIAN EASEMENTS WITHIN TRACT 9440, LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA, NORTH OF BANYAN, AS SHOWN
ON MAP V -019 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 82 -97, passed on June 2, 1982, the
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its authorization to
vacate certain equestrian easements hereinafter more particularly
described, and set the hour of 7:30 o.m, on July 7, 1982, in the Lion's
Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons
objecting to the proposed vacation; and
WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and
place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
as follows:
. SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted
that certain equestrian easements within Tract 9440 are unnecessary for
present or future Master Plan of Trails System purposes, and the City
Council hereby authorizes the vacation of those certain equestrian
easements as shown on Map V -019 on file in the office of the Clerk of
Lhe City of Ranc %o Cucamonga, which has been further described in a
legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by
reference made a part thereof.
SECTION 2: The property owners within Tract 9440 shall cause
all necessary legal documents to be prepared for abandonment, and cause
said documents to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County, California.
SECTION 3: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption
of this Resolution• and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
s
(0d
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE VACATION OF
EQUESTRIAN TRAILS IN TRACT NO. 9440
All those certain strips of land, 20 and 25 feet wide in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
shown as EQUESTRIAN EASEMENT on the plat of Tract Map No. 9440 as
recorded in Map Book 144, Pages 33, 34 and 35 in the office of the
County Recorder of said County.
(o
n
U
•
11
0
•
•
CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982 —
T0: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Vacation of Unnecessary Streets and Alleys Within the
Victoria Project
The vacation of streets and alleys as shown on the attached drawing is
required prior to the recordation of the tract maps within William Lyons
Victoria Project.
The William Lyon Company has requested that the public hearing for the subject
vacation be set so that final approval of the tracts would not be delayed.
Since the tract maps are not yet ready for finalaoproval, it is necessary to
continue the public hearing to coincide with final map approval.
Notices for Public Hearing have been posted at the site at the time of
original Public Hearing date of February 17, 1982.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council continue the public hearing until July 21,
1982, when the tract maps are submitted for final approval.
Respectfully submitted,
%
Tbc
Attachments
I (D /
- - ------ --------
p
II I
L.
L
TENTATIVE TRACT
NO. 11934
..... ......
.......... ... I L Ll
V-0!5 =T0 BE VACATED TRACT BOUNDARY
Ile" ... ,—
i
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
NOTICE OF POSTING
FOR
VACATION OF STREET
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO)
I declare, under penalty of making a false oath, that I am now,
and at all times mentioned herein was, the duly appointed,
qualified and acting Superintendent of Streets in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
•
That on the 23rd day of March, 1982, I caused to have posted a
Notice of Hearing for Vacation of Streets, a copy of which Notice
is attached hereto and made a part hereof; that the Notices were •
posted not more than three hundred (300) feet apart along the
lire of the street and that not less than three (3) Notices were
so posted; and that the posting was completed on the 23rd day of
march, 1982.
This Declaration Made This
day of 11982.
�X� -
C
((P 3 -
is
$3 MP
1 114
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE
WNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PROJECT AS SHOWN ON MAP
NO. V -015 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on the 17th day of February, 1982, at thnhour
of 7:00 P.M. in the Lion's Park Community Service Building, located at
• 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California, any and all persons interested
in or objecting to the proposed vacation may a^ y- before the Council and
then and there show cause why the proposed vacation should not be carried
out in accordance with the Resolution. Any protest to the proposed vacation
must be in writing and filed with the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
not Inter than the hour hereinabove set for hearing. For all further
particulars, reference is hereby made to the Resolution of Intention on file
with the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
DATA::
l J
y.. �
i treet Superintendent
/ (Py
0
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
July 7, 1982
0�
F
TO:
City Council and
City Manager
FROM:
Lloyd B. Hubbs,
City Engineer
SUBJECT:
MODIFICATION OF
DRAINAGE FEES AND
REGULATIONS IN CONJUNCTION
WITH ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 82 -1
r
1977
The attached Ordinance will eliminate drainage fees within the area of Assessment
District 82 -1 and remove the provisions of Ordinance Ill setting up the Special
Drainage Impact Zone within the Assessment District area. It is proposed that
the Council hold first reading of this Ordinance in order to be prepared for
final adoption concurrent with formation of Assessment District 82 -1 on July 21,
1982.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council complete first reading of the attached Ordinance
making recissions and amendments to certain Ordinances relating to drainage
regulations in the City.
Respectfully submitted,
// -,e ?,�'
LBH:bc
Attachments
i (P s
. ORDINANCE NO. 196
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING RESCISSIONS
AND AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN ORDINANCES RELATING TO
DRAINAGE REGULATIONS IN THE CITY
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose: The City has
initiated proceedings for the construction of certain drainage improve-
ments, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in a special
assessment district in a certain portion of the City, said special
assessment district known and designated as Assessment District No. 82 -1
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "), and upon the
successful confirmation of the assessments and award of construction
contract for the drainage improvements within said Assessment District,
certain previously adopted ordinance provisions can either be rescinded
or amended, inasmuch as the Assessment District construction would be
acco:nplishing the improvements to be financed by said drainage fees.
SECTION 2: Rescission: That upon the successful award,
• execution og c>ct, and posting of all required bonds for the com-
pletion of the imorovements in the Assessment District, all provisions
of Ordinance No. 111 are hereby rescinded, and said Ordinance shall no
lonner have any force or effect.
•
SECTION 3: Amendment: That upon a successful award, execu.
tion of the construction contract, and posting of all required bonds for
the completion of .he improvements in the Assessment District, all
pr^,eerties within the boundaries of the Assessment District shall be
exemnt from the provisions of Ordinance No. 112. Ordinance No. 112 is
hereby amended to so provide that upon the execution of contract for the
Asses ;•cent District, and posting of the required performance bonds, all
properties within the boundaries of said Assessment District shall not
be cublect to the fees and conditions of this Ordinance. This Ordinance
shall remain in full force and effect for all other properties, except
for those within the boundaries of said Assessment District.
SECTIOi'1 A: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Cl:�r'j, shall cause fhe same to be published within fifteen (15) days
aft ^r its nassaae at least once in The Daily Report, a newsoaper of
general circulation published in the CitT of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982.
i�(I
•
•
I
i
i
I
r r
ORDINANCE NO. Ill
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RMC10
CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLTSNING A SPECIAL DRAINAGE
THPACT ZONE NORTH OF THE SANTA FE RAILROAD TO ARAM ROUTE
BETDEEN HAVEN ANTI HULllt_N AVENUES, AND REQUIRING DETAILED
ENGINEERING STUDIES AND MITIGATION NRASURES IN CONNECTION
THERkI1ITH.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
doe. ordain as (allow:
SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Porous.
In recognition of the existence of unique drainage
problem creating potential hat. Lee to public health, safety, and property,
the City Council deems it appropriate to establish that portion of the
City bounded by:
one Santa Fe Railroad on the south. Arrow Route on the narth,
Naves Avenue on the .eat, and the aligament of Milliken Avenue oa
the cant"
a Special Drainage Impact Use requiring special engineering studies
and mitigations measures as a condition of the Issuance of a building
pemit.
SECTION 3: Drainage Study Reuulrements
The City Council finds that prior to the issuance of
a Ba ilding permit within the Special Impact zone boundary described in
Section 1, the applicant is hereby required to submit for approval of
the City Engineer a comprehensive hydrology study prepared by a Registered
Civil Engineer in the State of California. This study shall contain the
fallowing:
1. Analysis of existing drainage patterns and runoff quantlti we
on the site.
.. The existing ultimate discharge point of site runoff and the
general downstream path of runoff.
J. The proposed drainage patterns and increases in runoff quantities
generated by site development.
L. Proposed mitigation measures to prevent the discharge of
increased storm runoff from the site including proposed
construction of master plan facilities sufficient to mitigate
downstream damage.
5. Any other information required by the City Engineer to determine
the full drainage impacts of the proposed development.
SECTION I: FindinRS Required for Buildin¢ Permit Ienuance
No building permit shall he issued for a structure
within the SpeUal impice Zone unless the City Engineer has made the
follow ic, finding.:
1. That the proposed project will not increase storm runoff Iron
the site except where acceptable drainage fdellitfes exist to
accept said runoff.
R. Pmt the project by reasons of low -flow non -storm related
water will not rreste a public nuisance.
1. That the project will not divert or mncenerate (Iowa in such
a manner is to adver•;ely efrOCL downstream properties. To
lc c
"a.�Fi�'
c
insure this finding, the City Engineer may require a drainage
ceptance letter or easement from the adjacent downstream
property.
4. That were on—site retention facilities have been proposed a
sufficient maintenance contract has been executed and security
posted to insure proper maintenance o saidfacility. Minimum
.tit, for maintenance shall be $3,000 or such ocher higher
amount as set by the City Council upon reco®ehdation of the
City Engineer.
5. That all facilities proposed are in conformance with City
standards for design and construction.
These findings will be made subject to conditions established
by the City Engineer based upon the findings of the approved
Drainage Study.
SECTION 4: Security for Construction of Required dralnaae
icpro tots
there the findings required by Section 3 are based
on conditions requiring the construction of drainage improvements, no
building permit shall be issued until an agreement and bonds, letters of
credit, cash deposit, or other acceptable form of security have been
posted and accepted by the City Council to Insure the construction of
required facilities.
SECTION 5: Dtaitaae Fee Provisions
(a) Where a building permit is sought for in addition
to existing development within the Special Drainage Zone, the building
permit shall not be issued until drainage fees under the provisions of
City Ordinances have been paid for the entire developed area of the
site, The developed area shall be as defined in Section 4(c)(2) of
Ordinance 75 and shall be determined by the Building Official.
(b) Within the Special Drainage Impact Zone, the
provision of Section 4(c)(3) of Ordinance No. 75 shall not apply.
SECTION 6: The :layer shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSEL, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day 161h day of July, 1950.
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Palembo, Bridge Schlosser
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ATTEST:
Lancen :1, Nasscrma n. CIt, Clerk
G -1 »,..,16.Sc _hl.��,
Phm ip D. tnlnaanr, 1i,var
I
PI
0
171
n
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 7, 1982 uj
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN
BACKGROUND: With the construction of the Lesny apartment project
at Lemon and Haven, the Lesny Development Company has prepared
plans for the Haven Avenue median. This design is intended to
set the standard for the Haven Avenue median. The Rancho Cucamonga
Women's Club, which was largely responsible for the existing median
landscaping, has reviewed the proposed design and provided input
to the Planning Commission.
ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission, in its consideration of this
design, based their recommendation on the ability of the plant
material to be low maintenance and be drought, heat, smog and
wind tolerant. The Commission felt that the Canary Island Pine
trees do not meet this criteria. They felt that the Jacaranda
tree met those criteria better. The Commission was very supportive
of the stamped concrete alluvial rock pattern. This design feature
provides a historical design relationship as well as being low
maintenance. The Commission further recommended that the trees
be staked with galvanized metal stakes.
RECO"NENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of
the proposed median design concept with the following additions:
1. The median should be planted with Jacaranda trees,
instead of Canary Island Pine trees.
2. Trees should be staked with galvanized metal stakes.
3. A standard drawing and specifications will be devel-
oped for the Haven median following adoption of the
final design guidelines by the City Council.
Respectfully � u6tted,
JACK LA,;,
Director of Community Development
JL:DC:jr
Attachments: June 9, 1982 Planning Commission Staff,Report
April 14, 1982 Planning Commission Staff Report
A"
0
•
•
— CITY OF RANUIO CLrANMGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 9, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomel, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN
BACKGROUND: At the April 14 meeting the Planning Commission recommended
planting Jacaranda trees. Because the Rancho Cucamonga Women's Club was
largely responsible for the existing median landscaping, staff met with
the Women's Club to receive their input on the future median improvements.
ANALYSIS: Some Women's Club members had concern that Jacaranda trees may
freeze. The Jacaranda is fairly hardy after maturity; young plants are
tender below 25 degrees F. However, many trees are susceptible to frost
or freezing at young ages. The planting of good stock trees can mitigate
this concern.
RECTIMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review
and consider all material and input regarding this item and make a re-
commendation to the City Council.
Rgspectful y submitted,
R I'CK MEZ
City Planner
RG /DC /jk
Attachments: April 14, 1982 Staff Report
ITEM I
1:
r1
LJ
L
nTm nU n A XTn rnrn A A.rnw./
STAFF REPORT
U'� D
IV77
DATE: April 14, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN
Related File - Development Review No. 80 -34
BACKGROUND: In accordance with Conditions of Approval, the Lesny Develop-
ment Company has prepared landscape and construction plans for the Haven
Avenue r:edian island, Exhibit "A ", This median will "set the tone" for the
entire lennth of Haven Avenue. Because of the importance of this median as
a community design element, staff is seeking Planning Commission review and
consideration of the proposed design.
The existing "median" consists of Cypress trees and Pyracantha shrubs. A
stamued concrete pattern resembling alluvial granite stone is proposed for
the median landscape. An actual sample will be available at the Planning
CecTlis: ion rieeting. The proposed landscaping plan, Exhibit "B ", indicates
15 nallon size Canary Island Pine trees planted in an informal linear
pat *_ern. The trees will be underplanted with Indian Hawthorne shrubs.
A1;;1_LYS _f: Roadways serve as focal points for a community. Euclid Avenue
is an i Dnrtant Community Design element for the City of Upland. The Rancho
Curar:or.;a General Plan contains policies for medians:
"Landscaping should be scaled according to the
size of the roadway and the importance of the
route. Major views from the roadwav should he
enhanced and emphasized by the landscaping."
ITEM F
Haven Avenue Median Design
Planning Commission Agenda
April 14, 1982
Page 2
The parkway tree planting guidelines of the General Plan propose large
columnar evergreens to reflect the rural history and the image of Euclyptus
windrows. The guidelines also encourage planting the same species, and in
the sane pattern, for the entire length of a street or throughout an entire
area. However, the General Plan makes no recommendations as to the type
or tree variety to be used in the median.
However, concern has been expressed by the Commission regarding Canary
Island Pine trees as being representative of our rural history and the
Eucalyptus windrow heritage. Therefore, staff has conducted a detailed
analysis of 75 street trees, suitable for this area. Each tree was
reviewed in terms of the following criteria:
Low maintenance;
Moderate to fast growth rate; and
A tolerance for drought, heat, smog, and wind.
Attached, as Exhibit "C ", is a list of trees meeting these criteria that
would be appropriate for median planting.
E
The City encourages the use of special landscaping treatments on Special •
Boulevards, such as readily - available alluvial rock. Incorporating rock -
scaoe into landscaping conserves water and energy. The proposed stamped
concrete has the following advantages over hand - placed alluvial rock:
1 Easier and faster to install;
2 Costs approximately one -third as much; and
3. Has a consistent, uniform appearance.
OESI6I1 REVIEW COMMITTEE: The Design Review Committee has reviewed the
proposed -edian design and gave a favorable recommendation to the use of
,od concrete. The Committee had no specific recommendations as to the
use of Canary Island Pine trees for Haven Avenue.
UPT: U'IS: The following options are available to the Commission:
Approve the median design concept as presented.
Require modification to the median design with
regard to tree type. If this option is chosen,
the Planning Con:mi;sion si,ould orovide the designer
and staff with direction as to desired changes.
•
Haven Avenue Median Design
Planning Commission Agenda
• April 14, 1982
Page 3
RECORNENDAT ION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and
consider all material and input regarding this item and select one of the
options presented herein.
Respectfully submitted,
i.i: s...
I
RICK GOMEZ
City Planner
RG:DC:kep
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Flap
Exhibit "B" - Landscape and Construction Plan
Exhibit "C" - Tree List
•
•
0
\ORTH
CI ry ()I' n�\1: W1kV %Ai M 1 Lei
R.1 \CI-K) CUCANION 1 Trn.r:— A` I+"ls�
�/
PLANNING DIVISION EX1116IT- SCALF; _� --
0
T
lif
Z^
V
f
u
•
— .KY' T6 NMiIS M nlp Fbfff - M�hV'C .C4
Gll'rf � Lw'iNMGq FIOwILY✓lJl. T'P
.•• •!Y^_i�rts D'nua p upa ti mr.Me
AV4:NWO
HAYCH
CITY O
RANCI 10 CUCANK).\G1
PLANNING DIVISION
STEM: Hwor4 z, M* lAhl
TITUZ:mmufna 4 FlAt4-
GXI IIhIT _b- SCALE:
EXHIBIT "C"
TREES SUITABLE FOR MEDIANS
Deciduous
or
Common
Botanical
Evergreen
Name
Name
0
Italian Alder
Alnus Cordata
E
Silver Dollar Gum
Eucalyptus Polyanthomos
E
Desert Gum
E. Rudis
Se,ai - D
Jacaranda
Jacaranda Acutifolia
D
Crape Myrtle
Lagerstroemia Indica
E
Flaxleaf Paperbark
Melaleuca Linariifolia
E
Pink Melaleuca
M. Nesophila
E
Cajeput Tree
M. Quinquenervia
E
Chinese Plotinia
Photinia Serrulata
E
Canary Island Pine
Pinus Canariensis
D
London Plane Tree
Platanus Acerfolia
D
Chinese Scholar Tree
Sophora Japonica
•
•
4
0
^Tmv nn n A WTr nT i A LRnXTn A
REPORT STAFF
�N
� N
July 2, 1982
TO: City Manager and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager
RE: Salary Resolution Fiscal Year 82 -83
This past week City staff has been negotiating with the Employee
Committee through the Meet and Confer process to obtain agreement
on the attached salary resolution.
I am pleased to report that the employee committee and management
have reached an agreement which is reflected in the attached
resolution. The agreement includes a 5% across the board increase
as well as an increase in medical insurance coverage of $32.00
per month. This represents a total package of 6.03% which is
within the budgeted guidelines established by the City Council.
In addition, this increase will insure that employee salary
ranges remain competitive and sufficiently attractive to draw and
retain qualified employees.
JHR /vz
Enclosure
u•
May 25, 1982
City Manager Lauren Wasserman
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9320 Baseline Read
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Oeir Mr. Wasserman:
The petition of Abandonment of Equestrian Trails has been scheduled to be presented
to the City Council on June 2, 1982. We understand that this is considered a major
policy issue. As residents of Tract 9440, we would like you to know that this is
a major policy issue with us, too. The equestrian easement that runs on the back
of our lot seems to be rather ridiculous due to the fact that our deed restrictions
prohibit the ownership of horses in our neighborhood. But there are also other
major issues of great concern:
1. This easement must be maintained by the property owner whether he
uses it, has horses, or not.
2. The property owner pays property taxes on this property, not the
public which the easement serves.
3. Legally, the property owner must assume liability for an accident
or personal injury on his easement.
In all fairness, we do not see how the City Council can overlook property owner's
requests for abandonment of easement unless the city can assume responsibility for
property maintence, taxes, accident 6 personal injury liability and address the
issue of horse ownership in Tract 9440.
Your personal response to these issues will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
v (fir
Mr. d Mrs. Michael Batelaan
5935 Elmhurst Avenue
Alta Loma, CA 91101
/62
RLY i, 1992 CM COL=IL
�oc�/�5 /L• /4J 1cM. /� {TYIE �?2 ° — ✓_/17
%'OOT�•/C ZIU� G:ET 1�NV1r.Y. /rfL
/CUI••N
/6fµCAc /Are r✓ C {.c �.vc�o %P�- 'K /�tE
�
J
- - - -- - _(.06l L - - - - 3LVIJ_ --' -
-.
I
H�1 1 I
C
� ew3'vi�J
d
r
cr�r ✓i�C f �f•V C�oM M11�f /r. C C -� 6 GZj
F. FST' of
�Lmr ^Kra �-
�� -� b �_,� j:✓ /Jd�t� ✓N/o;> a` Nf7� iN.arri�
1�
Y/
0
n
i
T
D
F,
~ V
O
� 1
II \ 1 \
\
c°
I
-- - - -r �jf --i
I
OJwA� /vo.v // rv..n LVq °n72 7Ty1O °9
fi rJva2Z� al/.15 i/.a'ah r.,r�y ^.,!j1'O�
vaxnoa uIo [act 'L x7nr .
1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was
held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday,
July 7, 1982. The Meetin, was called to order by Mayor Mikels at 7:30 p.m.
Present were: City Council Members Richard M. Dahl, Phillip D. Schlosser and
Mayor Jon D. Mikels.
Absent: City Council Members Charles J. Buquet II and James C. Frost.
Also Present: Assistant City Manager and Acting City Clerk Jim Robinson;
Acting City Attorney, Ted Hopson; City Planner Rick Gomez; City Engineer
Lloyd Hubbs.
Approval of Minutes: Moved by Schlosser and seconded by Dahl to approve
the minutes of Kay 19, 1982 as amended; and the minutes of May 11, 1982
and June 16, 1982 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0-2.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS
a. Mayor Mikels announced a Historical Commission meeting would be held
on Tuesday, July 13, at 7:00 p.m. in the Lions Park Community Center.
b. Mayor Mikels announced that a Redevelopment Study Session would be
held on Monday, July 19, 1982 at 6:30 p.m. in the Lions Park Community
Center.
C. Mayor Mikels reported on the San Bernardino Associated Goverments Board
meeting he had attended earlier in the day and noted that they presented
the SCAG 1982 revised draft population forcasts. In addition, he
reported that a budget was adopted at the Omnitrans Board of Directors
meeting.
d. Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer, reported on the Day Creek Flood Control Project
meeting which he attended that day. He also stated that today bids
were opened on the Industrial Assessment District and the 21 bids received
came in about 202 below the Engineer's Estimate. He said that bond bids
would be received on July 15.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -7-7 in the amount of $238.114.43
b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Domenico M, 6 Josephine Femino,
Femino's Italian Cuisine, 8030 Vineyard Ave., for on -sale beer and
wine eating place.
c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Nasser 6 Shokofeh Dadrass, Rocky's
New York Style Pizzeria, 9615 Foothill Blvd. for on sale beer and wine.
d. Replacement for Security for Tract 10277 -1 Barmakian. Located on the north
side of Almond Road east of Carnelian..
e. Release of existing improvement agreement and acceptance of new improve-
ment agreement with letter of assignment to secure passbook account
improvement security for Parcel Map 4735/S,A. 80-09 at Banyan and Haven.
NO. . ,.12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
CARNELIAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK.
g. Acceptance of subdivision extension agreement - Tract 9539, Brubaker,
Davis, and Person: located on the west side of Sapphire Street,
south of Hillside Road.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -113
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
TRACT 9539.
h. Acceptance of Tract 10045 -1, Improvement Agreement, and Improvement
Security - Westland Venture; located at the northwest corner of
Hidden Farm Road and Haven Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. -2 -114
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF
TRACT NO. 10045 -1.
i. Recommend approval of agreement with Bank of America to act as paying
agent for bond redemption in conjunction with Assessment District 82 -1
(Provisions only effective at bond sale).
J. Recommend approval of agreement with Cucamonga County Water District
for utility relocation in conjunction with Assessment District 82 -1.
(Provisions only effective at bond sale).
k. Authorize award of contract to construct miscellaneous drainage structures
at various locations in the city. Lowest responsible bidder was
Slater Construction Compnay at $36,890.00 - Locations at Hellman and
6th Street, Archibald and 4th, Amethyst and Highland and Sapphire and Banyan.
1. Authorization to seek bids for the reconstruction of Sapphire Street
from Rosebud Street to Vinmar Street.
Fit. Request City Council approval of an agreement with Conrock Company for
the acquisition for right -of- -way for 6th Street to be constructed under
the proposed Assessment District 82 -1.
n. Award of annual street sweeping contract to Inland Power Sweeping at,
$2040 per month.
0. Release of Bonds
Tract 9262 and 9193 - located south of Baseline Road, east of Vineyard.
Owner: William Lyon Company.
Monumentation Bond (9262) $2,500
Monumentaticn Bond (9193) $1,950
Monumentation Bond $1,700
Tract 9445 - located on the northeast corner of Archibald and Banyan.
Owner: Mark III
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $507,000
C.L'.P. 81 -15 - located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and
Jersey Blvd. Owner: Larry Beck.
Certificate of Deposit (road) $3,330.49
D.R. 80 -09 - located on Cottage Avenue between 8th Street and Acacia
Street. Owner: Dr. L.V. Hofgaarden. Release of Retention.
P. Annual renewal of agreement for city -wide emergency street repair, clean-
up and supplementary maintenance contract. Laird Construction.
q. Intent to vacate 22nd Street at Center Street and alleyway between
22nd Street and 8th Street. Setting Public Hearing Date of 8 -4 -82.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -115
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE
22ND STREET AT CENTER STREET AND ALLEYWAY BETWEEN
22ND STREET AND 8TH STREET.
r. Set public hearing date of July 21, 1982 for Zone Change 82-01 and
Environmental Assessment and Development Review 82 -04 - Lewis.
s. Set public hearing date of July 21, 1982 for General Plan Amendment
82-OIB - City of Rancho Cucamonga. To amend the circulation element
of the general plan dealing with Highland Avenue to Interstate 15.
C. Authorize award of contract for widening and reconstruction of Base Line
Road from Carnelian Street to the West City limits. Lowest responsible
bidder was Fontana Paving at $75,690.50.
U. 1982 -83 City Engineer's Report for Landscaping Maintenance District
No. 1. Setting hearing to establish 1983 Assessments for July 21, 1982.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -116
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY
AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83; PURSUANT
TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO.
RESOLUTION 82 -117
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S 1982 -83 REPORT FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A change of zone from R -1- 20,000 (Single Family residential - 4 acre lots)
to R -2 /PD (two family residential /planned development) and the development
of 27 single family units, 81 patio homes and 202 townhouse units on 57.7
acres of land located between Haven Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, appro:;i:aatel
660' south of Wilson - APN 201 - 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63, 65 and 69. Rick Game
City Planner presented the staff report.
Acting City Clerk Robinson read the title of Ordinance No. 179.
ORDINANCE NO. 179 (FIRST READING)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 201- 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63,65 and 69, LOCATED
BETWEEN HAVEN AND HERMOSA AVENUES, APPROXIMATELY
660 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON, FROM R -1- 20,000 to R- 2 /P.D.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 179. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0-2 (Frost and Buquet absent)
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing:
* Bill Jones, 10259 Wilson, questioned whether the density of this development
was consistent with the General Plan.
Referring to the map, Rick Gomez, City Planner replied that this development
was consistent with the General Plan.
There being no further response from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public
hearing.
Councilman Dahl asked for a show of hands from the audience of how many people
were present tonight for this item. (Approximately 20 people rained their hands).
Referring to the Conditions of Approval, Councilman Dahl asked why Item 23 was
left off when it is part of the master trail system for the area.
City Planner Gomez stated that although the plans include the trails, it was an
oversight that that item was not checked off as one of the conditions of approval.
He also replied that he believed it was reviewed by the trails committee.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser that Item 23 pertaining to local
and master plan equestrian trails be included as a condition of approval for
Planned Development 82 -02 (TT 10826) - Lesney. Motion carried unanimously
3 -0 -2 (Frost and Buquet absent).
Mayor Mikels asked Acting City Attorney Hopson if the Council would have to refer
this item back to Planning Commission because of the change. Mr. Hopson replied
that it was not necessary because trails were shown on the site plan.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to continue public hearing and
set second reading for August 4, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0 -2 (Frost
and Buquet Absent).
Councilman Dahl encouraged residents to make their concerns known to Council
either by letter or contacting city staff prior to the second reading.
*Phillip Bollington, 9979 Manzanita reviewed the reasons he felt the
trails should be abandoned which included:
I. Would provide increased security.
2. Would allow homeowners to use the land for themselves.
3. Would help alleviate fly problem.
4. Concerned about liability factor for homeowners with public trails.
* Sydney Crabtree, 10009 Coca Ave., stated the covenants in their deeds did
not permit horses. He indicated there should be a place in the northern
area of the city for people who :o not have horses.
* Helen Husband, 10339 Coca Avenue, stated that when they purchased property
they knew about horse trail but were told that all they had to do was go
to the City with a majority of residents to have them abandoned.
* Hans Peterson, 5954 Dartmouth Ave. and Saul Cohen, 5938 Dartmouth Ave.
presented slide presentation and reviewed the reasons they felt the
trails should not be abandoned. Some of the points raised -- increase in
property value, access from rear of property, easy access to homes by
emergency vehicles, block walls have already been constructed and trails
are part of the larger trail complex.
* Michael Batelaan, 5935 Elmhurst stated he thought equestrian trails were
a goad idea but that in their particular, area the majority of residents
did not want horses. He expressed concern about maintenance, liability and
property taxes.
*
Judy Nay, 5918 Dartmouth, stated that if easements are kept, it will encourage
homeowners to buy horses in opposition to provisions of convenant.
There being no further public input, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing.
At this point, Councilman Dahl requested a brief recess. Mayor Mikels called
for a recess at 9:30 p.m.
Mayor Mikels called the meeting back to order at 9:43 p.m. with the three members
of Council and staff present.
In the discussion that followed, it was the consensus of Council that this item
be continued to the August 4th meeting when the full City Council would be present.
Ted Hopson, Acting City Attorney, pointed out that whatever Council's delibera-
tion is, they would not be deleting the easement as it runs along the east side
of the project on Hermosa, which at that point runs through public right -of -way.
He noted that would cover lots 38 through 45 and lot 1.
Councilman Dahl stated that this had been reviewed by the Advisory Committee
on Trails and he read their recommendation which in part stated "...the
Equestrian Advisory Committee primarily recommends the retention of all
equestraan easements in said tract ".
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to continue Public Hearing until
August 4, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0 -2 (Buquet and Frost Absent)
S
4D REVISION TO DRAINAGE FEE ORDINANCE FOR AREA OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82 -1
Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, reviewed staff report.
Jim Robinson, Acting City Clerk, read the Title of Ordinance No. 180.
ORDINANCE NO. 180 (First Reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING RESCISSIONS
AND AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN ORDINANCES RELATING TO
DRAINAGE REGULATIONS IN THE CITY.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 180. Motion carried unanimously 3 -0 -2 (Buquet and Frost Absent).
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to continue public hearing and
set second reading of Ordinance No. 180 to July 21, 1982.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
5A. HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN.
A proposed landscape design for the Haven Avenue Median. Rick Gomez, City
Planner, presented the staff report.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve Planning Commission
recommendations for proposed median design concept with the following
stipulations:
1.) The median should be planted with Jacaranda Trees, instead of Canary
Island Pine Trees.
2.) Trees should be staked with galvanized metal stakes.
3.) A standard drawing and specifications will be developed for the Haven
median following adoption of the final design guidelines by the City
Council.
Motion carried unanimously 3 -0 -2. (Buquet and Frost absent).
Mayor Mikels requested that specifications come back to Council for approval.
5B. APPROVAL OF SALARY RESOLUTION NO. 82 -119.
Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager, reviewed staff report.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
public hearing was closed.
Jim Robinson, Acting City Clerk, read the title of Resolution No. 82 -119.
RESOLUTION 82 -119
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -97 -A RELATING TO SALARY RANGES
IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ESTABLISHING REVISED PAY
RANGES AND BENEFITS FOR ALL FULL TIME AND PART
TIME EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83.
a
Ted Hopson, Acting City Attorney, requested that the Council adjourn to
Executive Session to discuss litigation.
7. COUNCIL BUSINESS
Councilman Dahl inquired when the Council was going to discuss the upgrading
of the Citizens Advisory Commission and the appointment of members. After
general discussion, Council asked Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager, to
obtain the following information for Council's review as sown as possible:
1. Send a letter to all current members to see if they wished to continue
serving on Commission.
2. Check attendance of members to see if they are in compliance with adopted
rule of attendance.
3. Report back to Council on restructuring of Commission.
4. Send letters to Planning Commission applicants who were not selected,
inquiring if they were interested in applying for Advisory Commission.
Mr. Robinson responded that he would try to get this information to Council
before the August 4, 1982 Council meeting. Council concurred that this item
should be set as a tentative agenda item for discussion at the August 4th
meeting with appointments tentatively scheduled for August 18th.
Mayor Mikels requested that the vacancies on the commission also be advertised.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to adjourn to executive session,
to reconvene at Redevelopment Study Session on Monday, July 19, 1982. Motion
carried unanimously 3 -0 -2. Meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Cinny Itara
Acting Deputy City Clerk
Y
Resolution No. 82 -119
Page 4
SCHEDULE 1 -- SAI +LRY CODE TARLE
BASIC PAY SCHEDULE IN HOURLY, BI- WEEKLY AND MONTHLY AMOUNTS
ONE HALF PERCENT BETWEEN RANCRS
MONTHLY AMOUNTS ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR
Range Hourly B1- Weekly Monthly
Number Rare Rate Rate
1.
2.0028
160.615
348
2.
2.0192
161.538
350
?1.3.
2.0250
162.000
351
4.
2.0165
162.923
353
S.
2.0481
163.846
355
6.
2.0596
164.2692
357
7.
2.0212
165.6923
359
8.
2.0769
166.1538
360
9.
2.0805
162.0769
362
30.
2.1000
160.000
364
111
2.1115
168.9231
366
12.
2.1231
169.8462
368
13.
2.1288
170.3072
369
14.
2.1404
171,2300
371
15.
2.1519
122_1538
373
16,
2.1635
173.0769
375
17.
2.1750
174.00
377
10.
2.1865
174.9231
379
19.
2.1981
175.0462
301
20,
2.2096
126.2692
383
21.
2.2212
177.6923
385
22.
2.2269
178.153
386
23,
2.2385
179.0269
388
24,
2.250
180.000
390
25.
2.261
180.9231
392
26.
2.223
181.846
394
27.
2.28
182.769
396
20.
2.296
183.692
398
29.
2.307
184.615
400
30.
2.319
185.538
402
31,
2.3308
186.461
404
32.
2.3423
107.784
406
33.
2.3530
188.307
408
34.
2.365
189.210
410
35.
2.1769
190.153
412
76.
2.188
191876
414
37.
2. MID
192.000
416
38.
21.17
193.386
419
19.
2.428
194.107
421
40,
24411
1951231
423
41.
2.451
t'15.
151
421
42.
2.461,
192.0
7n
427
41.
:'00
199.100
44.
2.4865
L48.421
411
45.
2.M4
19 o,
146
411
46.
2.5150
201.111
438
47,
2.5228
2n2.M
41R
48.
2,5385
201.076
440
49,
2.550
204.000
442
511.
2.561
204,921
444
51.
2,570
206.307
447
Range Hourly Bi- Meekly Monthly
Number Rate Rare Rare
52. 2.5904 202.230 449
53, 2.601 208.153 451
54. 2.613 209.026 453
55. 2.630 210.46 456
56. 2.642 211.304 450
52. 2.653 212.302 460
5B. 2.665 213.210 462
59. 2.682 214.615 465
60. 2.694 215.538 462
61. 2.2058 216.461 469
62. 2,723 217.846 422
63. 2.7340 218.269 424
64. 2.2460 219,692 476
65. 2.2630 221.026 479
66. 2,2250 222.0000 481
67. 2,2920 223.3046 481,
68. 2. 80 30 224.302 436
69. 2.0210 225,692 489
20. 2,0310 226.615 491
71. 2,8440 222,530 493
72. 2.0615 228.9230 496
73. 2,0230 229,8460 496
74. 2.0900 231.2300 501
75, 219010 232.1530 503
76. 2.91% 233.5380 506
77. 2.9308 234.4615 508
78. 2,9491 235,8462 511
79. 2.959A 236,7692 513
K. 29269 238.1538 516
81. 2.9942 239.5335 519
02. 3,0019 240.4615 521
81. 3.0D1 241.8462 524
04. 3,0345 242,2492 526
95. 3.0519 244.1539 529
85, 3.0692 245.5135 532
87. 3.0809 246.4615 534
08. 3.0991 242.8462 532
89, 1.115'. 249.2309 540
90, 1.1269 250 1530 542
9L. 3.1442 251.9105 545
92. 3.1615 252.9231 540
93. 1.1293 2"V. 1027 551
94, 3,190. 25'. 281s 553
95. 3.2027 256.6L'' 556
96. 3.1!50 258.0000 55o
97. 1.242) 259 .3846 562
98. 3.2596 260.7692 565
99. 3.2212 261 6921 $67
100, 3.2885 261,0769 520
201. 3. I'M 264.4615 .57)
z_ w.
!r ,.
4. ..
Muse Hourly e1- weekly Non thly
Number Bate Aa to pate
102. 3.3231 265.8462 526
103. 3.3404 262.2308 529
104. 3.3522 268.6154 582
105. 3.3250 220.000 585
106. 3.3903 271.3846 588
102. 3.4038 222.3022 590
106. 3.4212 223,6923 593
109, 3.4385 275.0269 596
110. 3.4558 226.4615 599
111. - 3,4731 277.8462 602
112. 3.4904 279.2309 605
113. 3.5077 280.6154 608
114. 3.5250 282.000 611
115. 3.5403 283.3846 614
116. 3.5654 285.2308 618
111, 3.5827 286.6154 621
118. 3.600 280.000 624
119. 3.6173 289.3846 622
120. 3.6346 290.7692 630
121. 3.6519 292.1538 633
122. 3.6692 293.5385 636
123. 3.6865 294.923 639
124. 3,7096 296.2692 643
125. 3.2269 298.1538 646
126. 3.2442 299.5385 649
127. 3.7615 300.9231 6S2
138. 3.2846 302.2692 656
129. 3.8019 304.1538 659
130. 3.8192 305.5385 662
131. 3.8423 307.3846 666
132. 3.8596 308.7692 669
133. 3.8269 310.1538 622
134. 3.9000 312.000 626
135, 3.9173 313.3846 629
136. 3.9346 314.7692 682
137. 3.9522 316.6154 686
138. 3.9750 318.000 689
139. 3.9981 319.8462 693
140. 4.0154 321.2308 696
141. 4.0385 323.0269 700
142. 4.0558 324.4615 703
143. 4.0788 326.3027 702
144. 4.0962 327.6921 710
145. 4.1192 329.5395 714
146, 4.1365 330.9231 717
147. 4.1596 332.7692 721
148. 4.1769 334.1311 724
149. 4.2000 336.000 728
15, 4.2231, 337. ?162 732
1511 4.240'. 330.2309 235
152. 4.2115 341.0749 739
153. 4.2965 312.9231 743
154, 4. J,1 1d 344. 11,7 7 746
M. 4,12 "n 111.1;13 750
156. 4.1301 11.P.000 75'.
137. 4.37❑ 149.8462 758
158. 4.190'. 351 .2 104 761
159. 4,413 351.0269 765
160. 4.4365 354.9211 769
161. 4.1,M 356.7692 223
Resolution No. 82 -119
Pagm 5
flange Hourly el- weekly Monebly
Number Race Race Bate
162. 4 .4827 358.6154 222
163. 4.5058 360.4615 281
164. 4.5288 362.3022 285
165. 4.5519 364.1538 289
166. 4.5692 365.5385 292
162, 4.5923 367.3846 296
168. 4,6154 369.2308 800
169. 4,6385 321.0269 804
170. 4.6615 322.9231 808
121. 4.6846 324.2692 012
122. 4.2135 322.0769 817
123. 4.2365 378.9231 821
174. 4.7596 380.7692 825
125. 4.7827 382.6154 829
126. 4.8058 384.4615 033
172. 4.8288 386.3027 032
128. 4,8519 388,1538 841
179, 4.8808 390.4615 846
180. 4.9038 392.3072 850
181. 4.9269 394.1530 854
182. 4.9500 396.000 858
103. 4.9288 398.3022 "1
184. 5.0019 400.2538 867
185. 5.0250 4n2.000 871
186. 5.0530 404,3022 826
187. 5.0769 406,1530 880
188. 5.1000 408.000 884
189. 5.t288 410.307P 889
190. 5.1519 4121538 893
191. 511808 414.4615 898
192. 5.2038 416.3072 902
193. 5.2322 418.6154 907
194, 5.2558 420.4615 911
195. 5.2846 422,2692 916
196. 5.3077 424,6154 920
192. 5.3365 426.9231 925
198. 5.3654 429.2308 930
199. 5.3895 431.0269 934
200. 5.4173 433.3846 939
201_ 5.4462 435.6923 944
202. 5.4692 432.5385 948
203, 5.4981 439.0462 953
204. 5.5269 442.1138 958
205. 5.5558 444,4615 963
206. 5.5768 446.3072 962
207. 5.6022 448.6154 972
209. 5.6165 459.9231 977
209. 5,6655 453.2088 )a1
210. 5.b9 t3 455.3385 982
211. 5.2211 457.9462 992
212 5,7519 460,1538 997
213. 5.2.909 462.4615 1002
21:. 5.9296 464 JR, 10117
215. 7.8341 467.01/., 101'
216, 5.8623 469.1846 1012
212, 5.39b` 421.6923 1022
218. 519150 470M 1027
219. 5.9538 476.3072 1012
220. 5.9822 428.6154 1032
221. 6,0173 481.1946 1041
,M 1
it; Z
Y
J
Resautimn
Mo. 82 -119
Paee 6
Range
Hourly
81- Weekly
Monthly
Pang.
Hourly
Bt- Weekly
Monthly
Number
)late
Rate
Rate
Number
Bate
Rate
Rate
222.
6.0462
483.6923
1048
282.
8.1519
652.1538
1413
223.
6.0750
486.000
1053
283
8.1923
655.3846
1420
224.
6.1038
488.3077
1058
284.
8,2327
658,6154
1427
225.
6.1385
491.0769
1064
285.
8.2708
662.3077
1435
226.
6.1673
493.3846
1069
2%.
8.3192
665.5385
1442
227.
6.1962
495.6923
1074
287.
8.3596
668.7692
1449
228.
6.2308
498.4615
low
288.
8.4000
672.000
1456
229.
6.2596
500.7692
1085
289.
8.4462
675.6923
1464
230.
6.2885
503.0769
1090
290.
8.4065
678.9231
1471
\ 231.
6.3231
505.8462
1096
291.
8.5269
682.1538
1478
y
232.
6.3519
508.1531
110
292.
8.5131
685.8662
1486
233.
6.3865
510.9231
1107 7
293.
8.6135
689.0769
1493
234,
6.4154
513.2308
1112
294.
8.6531
692.3071
1500
235.
6.4500
516.000
1118
295.
8.7000
696.000
1508
" 236.
6.6846
518.7692
1124
296,
8.7462
699.6923
1516
237.
6.5135
521.0769
1129
297.
8.7065
702.9231
1523
238.
6.5481
523.8462
1135
298.
8.0327
706.6154
1531
239.
6.5769
526.1538
114
299.
0.0131
709.8462
1538
-
240.
6.6115
528.9231
1146 6
300.
8.9192
713.5385
1546
. �:•
241.
6.6462
511.6923
1152
301.
8.9654
717.2308
1554
242.
6.6008
534.6615
1153
302.
9.0115
720.9231
1562
�.
243.
6.7
536.7692
116
303.
9.0519
724.1538
1579
244.
6.7442 442
539.5375
1169 9
306.
9.0981
73.8462
1577
245.
6.1788
542.3077
1175
303.
9.1442
7311.5385
1585
246.
6.8405
545.0769
118.
1066
9.1904
735.2308
1593
247.
6.8481
567,0662
1187 7
307.
9.2365
738.9231
1601
240,
6.8827
550.6154
119
308.
9.2027
742.6154
1609
249.
6.9173
55].)846
1199 9
309.
9.3288
766.3071
1617
250.
6.9519
556.1538
1205
310,
9.3150
750.000
1625
'
251.
6.9765
558.9231
1211
311.
9.4312
753.6923
1613
252.
7.0212
561.6923
1217
312.
9.4673
757.3846
1641
253.
7.0558
$64.4615
1223
313.
9.5192
761.5385
1650
254,
7.0904
567.2308
1229
314.
9.5634
765.2308
1658
255.
7.1250
570.000
1235
315.
9.6115
768.9231
1666
256.
7.1596
572.7692
1241
316.
9.6577
772.6154
1674
J-
257.
7.2000
576.000
1248
317.
9.7096
776,7692
1683
-
258.
7.2346
578.7692
1254
318.
9.7558
780.4615
1691
259.
7.2692
581.5385
1260
319,
9,7962
783.6923
1698
#
260.
7.3038
504.307]
1266
320.
9.8538
780.3077
1708
y
261.
7.3442
587.5385
1273
321.
919058
792.4615
1717
.'
'..;
262.
7.3788
590.3077
1279
322.
9.9519
796.1538
1725
263.
7.4192
593.5385
1286
323.
10.0038
800.3077
1734
264.
7.4538
596.3077
1292
324.
10.0558
804,4615
1743
265,
7.4885
599.0769
1298
325.
10.1019
808.1539
1751
266.
7.5280
602.3077
1305
326.
10.1538
812.3077
1760
267.
7.5635
605,0769
1311
327.
10.2056
816.4615
1769
268.
7.6038
608.3077
1318
328.
10.2577
020.6154
1776
269.
7.6442
611.5385
1325
329.
10.3096
824.7692
1787
q..
270.
7.6846
614.7692
1332
330.
10.3615
828.9231
1796
271.
7.7192
617.5385
1338
331,
10.4135
833.0769
1805
n
272.
7.7596
620.7692
1345
332.
10.4654
831.2308
1814
273.
7.7942
623,5385
1351
333.
10.5173
841.3844
1823
274.
7.8346
626.7692
1350
334.
10.5692
845.5385
1832
p
275.
7.8750
630.000
1365
335.
10.6212
849.(923
1841
276.
7.9154
633,2308
1372
336.
10.6731
853.8462
1850
1
277.
7.9500
637,000
1378
337.
10.7250
858.000
1859
;�.
270.
7.9904
639.2308
1385
338.
10.7827
862.6154
1869
279.
8.0300
642.4615
1392
339.
10.8346
866.7692
1878
280.
8.0712
645,6923
1399
340.
10.8865
870,9231
1087
yspC.
6
281.
8.1115
648.9231
1406
341,
10,9442
875.5385
1897
Y
J
a t
U.S. Hourly Bi- Weekly Monthly
Hoo6er Bate Pate Pate
342. 10.9962 879.6923 1906
M3. 11.0538 884.3077 1916
344. 11,1058 888.4615 1925
M5. 11.1635 893.0769 1935
M6. 11.2212 897.6923 1945
347. 11.2731 901.8462 1954
Me. 11.3308 906.4615 1964
M9. 11.3885 911.0769 1974
350. 11.4462 915.6923 1984
351, 11.50)8 920,M77 1994
352, 11.5615 924.9231 2004
353. 11.6192 929.5385 2014
354. 11.6769 934.1538 2024
355. 11.7)46 938.7692 2034
356. 11.7923 943.3846 2044
357. 11.8500 948.000 2054
358. 11.9135 953.0769 M65
359. 11.9712 957.6923 2075
M0. 12.0288 962.3077 2085
M1. 12.0923 967.3846 2096
362. 12.1500 972.000 2106
363. 12.2135 977.0769 2117
364. 122712 981.6923 2127
M3. 12.3346 986.7692 2138
366. 12.3923 991.3846 2148
M7. 12.4558 996.4615 2159
36e. 12.5192 1001.5385 2170
369. 12.5827 1006.6154 2181
370. 12.6460 1011.6923 2192
371. 12.7096 1016.7692 2203
372. 12.7731 1021.8462 2214
373. 12.8)65 1026.9231 2225
374. 12.9000 1032.000 22M
375. 12.9635 1037.0769 2247
376. 13.0327 1042.6154 2259
377, 13.0962 1047.6923 2270
378. 13.1596 10527692 2281
379. 13.2288 1058.3077 2293
380. 13.2923 1063.3846 2304
381. 13.3615 1068.9231 2316
382. 13.4250 1074.000 2327
383. 13.4942 1079.5385 2339
384. 13.5635 1085.0769 2351
385. 13.6269 1090.1538 2362
386. 13.6962 1095.6923 2374
387, 13.7654 1101.2308 2386
388. 13.8348 1106.7692 2398
389. 13.9038 1112.3077 2410
390. 13.9731 1117.8462 2422
391. 14.0423 1123.3846 2434
392. 14,1115 1128.9231 2446
393. 14.1808 1134.4615 2458
394. 14.2558 1140.4615 2471
395. 14.3250 1146.000 2483
396. 14.400 1152.000 2496
397. 14.469 1157.538 2508
398. 14.5442 1163.5385 2521
399, 14.6135 1169.0769 2533
400. 14.6885 1175.0769 2546
401. 14.7635 1181.0769 2559
Beeolurion No. 82 -119
F., 7
Range Hourly Bi- Weekly Mothly
Number Nate Pare gate
402.
14.8327
1186.615
2571
403.
14.9077
1192.615
2584
404.
14.9827
1198.6154
2597
405.
15.0577
1204.615
2610
406.
15.1327
1210.6154
2623
407.
15.207
1216.615
2636
408.
15.2827
1222.615
2649
409.
15.3635
1229.0769
2663
410.
15.4305
1235.0769
2676
411.
15.511
1241.0769
2689
412.
15.588
1247.076
2702
413.
15.669
1253.538
2716
414.
15.75
1260.00
2730
415.
15.831
1206.461
2744
416.
15.906
127..461
2757
417.
15.9865
1278.923
2771
418.
16.067
1285.3846
2785
419.
16.148
1291.846
2799
420.
16.228
1298.368
2813
421.
16.3096
1]04.769
2827
422.
16.3904
1311.2308
2841
423.
16.4712
1317.6923
2855
424.
16.5577
1324.6154
2870
425.
16.6385
1331.0769
2084
426.
16.7192
1337.5305
2890
427.
16.8058
1344.4615
2913
420.
16.8865
1350.9231
2927
429.
16.9731
1757.8462
2942
430,
17.0596
1364.7692
2957
434
17.1404
1371.2308
2971
432.
17.2269
1378.1538
2986
433.
17.
J135
1385.0769
3001
434.
17.4000
1392.0000
M16
435.
17.4865
1396.9231
3031
436.
17.5788
1406.3077
3047
437.
17.6654
1413.2308
3062
438.
17.7519
1420.1538
3077
439.
17.8385
1427.0769
3092
440.
17.9308
1434.4615
3108
441.
18.0173
1441.3846
3123
442.
18.1096
1448.7692
3139
443.
18.2019
1456.1538
3155
444.
18.2942
1463.5385
3171
445.
18.3808
1470.4615
3186
446,
18.4731
1477.8462
3202
447.
18.5654
1485.2308
3218
448.
18.6577
1492.6154
3234
449.
10.7558
1500.4615
3251
450.
18.8481
1507.8462
3267
451,
18.9404
1515.2308
3281
452.
19.9395
1521.0769
3300
453.
19.131
1530.461
3316
454.
19.1.29
1538.3077
3333
455.
19.320
1545.692
3349
456.
19.419
1558.538
3366
457.
19.5173
1561.3846
3383
458.
19.615
1569.2306
3400
459.
19.713
1577,076
3417
460.
19.811
1504.923
3434
461.
19.9096
1592.769
3451
..e.n .1 ....w ..
Re soLm iun N0. 82 -119
8
Ramye Hourly 01- Weekly 8ombhly
Number Rare R t. R.L.
462. 20.007 1600.615 1468
463. 20.111 1608.923 3486
464. 20.209 1616.769 3503
465. 20.313 1625.076 3521
466. 20.411 1632.923 3538
467. 20.515 1641.231 3556
460. 20.619 1649.538 3574
469. 20.723 1657.046 3592
470, 20.826 1666.153 3610
471. 20.931 1674.462 7628
472. 21.035 1682.769 M46
473. 21.138 1691.076 M64
474. 21.242 1699.380 3682
475. 21,351 1708.153 3701
476. 21.455 1716.461 3719
477- 21.565 1725.231 3738
478. 21.669 1733.538 3756
479, 21.778 1742.307 3775
480, 21.888 1751.076 3794
481. 21.990 1759.846 3813
482. 22.1077 1768.6154 3832
403. 22.2173 1777.3846 3851
484. 22.3269 1786,1538 3870
485. 22.4365 1794,9231 3869
406. 22.5462 1803,6923 3908
487. 22.6615 1812,9231 3928
408. 22.7769 1822.1538 3948
489. 22.8923 1031.3846 3968
490. 23.007 1840.6154 3988
491. 23.1231 1849,8462 4008
492, 23.2385 1859,0769 4020
493. 23.3538 1860.3077 4040
494, 23.4692 1877.5385 4068
495, 23.7385 1979.0769 4080
496. 23.700 1896.000 4108
497. 23.015 1905.23 4128
498. 23.9365 1914.9231 4149
499. 44.057 1924.620 4170
500. 24.178 1934.307 4191
,01. 24.300 1944.00 4212
502. 24.4212 1953.6923 4233
503. 24.5423 1968.3846 4254
594. 24,6635 1973,0769 4275
505. 24.7846 1988.7692 4296
506, 24.9058 1992.4615 4317
507. 25.032 2002.615 4339
508, 25.1596 2012.769 4361
509. 25.1865 2022.923 4303
510. 25.4133 2033.0769 4405
511, 255404 2043.231 4427
512. 25,609 2048.769 4439
513. 25.736 2058.923 4461
51f. 25.863 2069.076 4481
515. 25.990 2079.230 4505
516, 26.123 2089,846 4528
517. 26.198 2095.046 4541
513. 26.331 2106.461 4564
519. 26.463 2117.076 4587
520. 26.5960 2127,692 4610
521, 26,720 2138.307 4633
Rau Re Hourly bi- Weekly 5Iomrhly
Number Race Rare Raze_
522. 26.8615 2148.9230 4656
523. 26 -9942 2159.5385 4679
524- 27.1269 2170.1538 4702
525. 27.2b54 2181.2308 4726
526, 27,4038 2192.3077 4750
527. 27.5423 2203.3846 4774
528. 27.6808 2214.4615 4798
529. 27.8192 2225.5385 4822
530. 27.9577 2236.6154 4846
531. 20.0962 2247.6923 4870
532 28.2346 2258.7692 4094
533 28.3731 2269.8462 5910
534 20,5173 2281.3846 4943
535 28.6615 2292.9231 4968
536 28.8058 2304.4615 4993
537 20.9500 2316.0000 5018
538 29.0942 2327.5385 5043
539 29.2385 2339.0769 5068
540 29.3827 2350.6154 5093
541 29.5269 2362.1530 5118
542 29.6769 2374.1538 5144
543 29.8269 2386.1538 5170
544 29.9769 2398.1538 4196
$45 30.1269 2410.1538 5222
546 30.2769 2422.1538 $240
547 30.4269 2434.1538 $274
548 30.5769 2446.1538 5300
549 30.7269 2458.1538 $326
550 30.8827 2470.6154 5353
551 31.0385 2483.0769 5380
552 31.1942 2495.5385 5407
553 31.3500 2500.0600 5434