HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/08/04 - Agenda PacketCi G� 11p3.
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCtVN10NGk
CITY CC�L `CIL
g a AGLNnk
1977
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline
for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The
City Clerk's Office receives all such items.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
A. Pledge of, Allegiance to Flag.
B. Roll Call: Dahl k , Buquet;. Frost_, Schlosser_,__, and Mikels__�Y_.
• C. Approval of Minutes: July 7, 1982.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. Presentation of Certificates of Appreciation to: Cucamonga Rome Boys'
Baseball team, CPAC, and Rancho Grande Riwanis Club for work efforts on
the Urban Forestry Grant project.
b. Monday, August 9, 7:00 p.m. - Adjourned meeting of City Council to con-
sider Resolution of Necessity - Lion's Park Community Center.
C. Tuesday, August 10, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL COMMISSTON - Lion's Park Com-
munity Center,
3. CONSFNI CALENDAR.
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncon-
troversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without dis-
cussion.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -8 -4 for $110,394.56_ 1
b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Linda and Vincenzo 2
Biscardi, Biscardi's Italian Deli S Grill, 8661 Base
Line, for off -sale beer S wine.
•
City Council Agenda -2- August 4, 1982
c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Antonio and Evangeline 3
M. Fernandes; Antonio and Tammy L. Narcisco, Steer 'N
Stine Restaurants, 8348 Archibald, for on -sale beer S wine
eating place.
d. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Ik Kyo Um and Michael 5
Myung Yoon, Quality Market, 10120 25th Street.
e. Request funding of liability insurance for Sheriff's 7
Deputy Reserves in the amount of $2,100.
I, Approval of contract for Environmental Services for the 10
Etiwaada Specific Plan Draft Environment Impact Report
with James Doolin - amount not to exceed $2,500.
g. Acceptance of Bonds to replace Certificate of Deposit 15 i.:a,bt -`
for off -site improvements - Wen Loftus III located at
8968 Archibald Avenue.
Release Certificate of Deposit $ 6,500.00
h. Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and bonds for M.D.R.
• 82 -08, China Alley Restaurant, located at 8270 Foothill
Blvd.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -143
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII. OF THE CITY
OF %1NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IM-
PROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR MINOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 82 -08.
i. Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Improvement
Security for Director Review 81 -33 - Poly Plastic
Products.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IM-
PROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY
FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW 81 -33.
j. Request authorization to seek bids for reconstruction
of Vineyard Avenue from 8th Street to Arrow Highway,
Federal Aid Urban Project M- MG- R194(2).
10
•
•
City Council Agenda -3- August 4, 1982
k. Release of Bonds:
*Tract 9290 - located north of Lemon, west of Hermosa
Owner - Vanguard Builders.
Monumentation Bond $4,700.00
*Tract 9589 - located on the north side of Red Hill
Country Club Drive abutting and west of Cucamonga Creek.
Owner - James H. Markle.
Monumentation Bond $3,000.00
*Tract 9356 - located north of Highland Avenue, west of
Hellman. Owner - Kingswood, Inc.
Monumentation Bond $1,080.00
*Tract 9262 - located on the west side of Vineyard,
of Base Line. Owner- William Lyon Co.
Accept reduced Faithful Performance Bond $20,000
Accept reduced Labor & Material Boad $10,000
Release Faithful Performance Bond $136,800
Release Labor & Material Bond $ 68,400
*Tract 9193 - located on the west side of Vineyard,
south of Base Line. Owner - William Lyon Co.
Accept
Reduced Faithful Performance Bond
$
10,000
Accept
Reduced Labor & Material
$
5,000
Release
Faithful Performance Bond
$
69,600
Release
Labor & Material
$
34,800
1. Set Public hearing date of August 18, 1982: Environmental
Assessment and Tentntive Tract 12184 - Town and County.
Appeal of Planning Commission decision for a total resi-
dential development of a 32 lot subdivision on 8.5 acres
of land in the R -1 zone located on the east side of Beryl
south of Rase Line - APN 208 - 011 -49.
40
19 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A. VACATION OF UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN' THE VIC- 42
TORIA PROJECT. (With Resolution No. 82 -118).
Item should be continued to special meeting of August 9th. \
6
•
City Council Agenda -4- August 4, 1982
B. VACATION OF CERTAIN TRAIL EASEMENTS WITHIN TRACT 9440.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -118
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VACATION
OF CERTAIN EQUESTRIAN EASEMENTS WITHIN TRACT
9440, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HERMOSA,
NORTH OF BANYAN, AS SHOWN ON MAP V -019 ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
C. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS.
43
ORDINANCE NO. 170 (second reading) 49
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IMPOSING A
FEE PAYABLE AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION FOR A
BUILDING PERMIT FOR THOSE LOTS OR PARCELS OF
LAND WITH RESPECT TO WHICH FRONTAGE IMPROVE-
MENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED PURSUANT TO A REIM-
BURSEMENT AGREEMENT.
REESOLUTION NO. 82 -147
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
A POLICY WITH RESPECT TO PAYMENT OF INTEREST
ON REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS.
D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 82 -01 AND
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 82 -04 - LEWIS. A change of zone
from A -t (limited agriculture) to A -P (administrative pro-
fessional) for 2.045 acres of land, for the development
of 28,800 square foot, two story office building. The
project site is located within the Terra Vista Planned
Community area, located on the east side of Haven Avenue,
between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077-
421-06.
ORDINANCE NO. 181 (second reading) 52
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CYIY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER L077- 421 -06 FROM
A -I TO A -P FOR 2.045 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE
TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE
io EAST SIDE OF HAVEN, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AMC, CHURCH STREET.
•
City Council Agenda -5- August 4, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 82 -02
TENISLIVE TRACT 10826 - LESNEY. A change of zone from
R -1- 20,000 (single family residential - � acre lots) to
R -2 /PD (two family residential /planned development) and
the development of 27 single family units, 81 patio
homes and 202 townhouse units on 57.7 acres of land,
located between Haven Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, approxi-
mately 660' south of Wilson - AIN 201 - 181 -12, 13, 14,
02. 63. 65. and 69.
ORDINANCE NO. 179 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 181 -12, 13, 14,
02, 63, 65, AND 69 LOCATED BETWEN HAVEN AND
HERMOSA AVENUES, APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET SOUTH
OF WILSON, FROM R -1- 20,000 TO R -2 /PD.
F. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -11 AND CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 54
I!IPACT REPORT - NEEVA. The change of zone from A -1 -5
(limited agriculture) to R- 1- 20,000 (single family minimum
20,000 square foot lots) and R -3 (multiple family residen-
tial) for approximately 65 acres of land located on the
. scuthside of Wilson Avenue, east and adjacent to Chaffey
College.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING
THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT 11550 HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN
COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA AND STATE GUIDELINES.
ORDINANCE NO. 182 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 197 -07 FROM A -1 -5
TO R- 1- 20,000 AND R -3 FOR APPROXIMATELY 65
ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
WILSON AVENUE, EAST AND ADJACENT TO CHAFFEY
COLLEGE.
92
G. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO, 1 ANNUAL ENGINEER'S _ 94
REPORT.
C7
•
City Council Agenda -6- August 4, 1982
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -133 98
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND
COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT
OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1
H. ORDERING• THE VACATION OF PORTION OF 22ND STREET AT
CENTER AVENUE AND ALLEYWAY BETWEEN 22ND STREET AND
BID STREET - LUCAS.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED
A PORTION OF 22ND STREET AT CENTER AVENUE AND
ALLEY WAY, BETWEEN 22ND STREET AND 8TH STREET.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
99
A. CONSIDERATION FOR FORMATION OF A PARK$ AND TRAILS 105
COMMISSION. Staff report by Bill Holley.
B. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGES TO ORDINANCE NO. 87f, ESTABLISH- 107
ING THE ADVISORY COMMISSION. Staff report by Jim
Robinson.
C. APPROVAL. OF WORD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT FOR CITY HALL. 127 _
Staff report by Jack Lam.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS.
7. COUNCIL. BUSINESS,
8. ADJOURNMENT.
P96] QTY TINCHC CUCA.YUNGA
• •ARA A 46 Y E h 0 E R h A A E
1110 45 5IC7
• iry 97 5IC9
" ^4E 5754
C 3c,;RC snit
• 11134 5150
c 235 l5$C
1::14.5 fs�c
• 10142 WS
30143 F410
11)144 41.50
VInI 4C In
• I'a3 1010
YCIJ
t-105 YL 10
YJt C032
• H +cl 3140
!M i5"A n32S
• 15 ^1C C436
SJ I? 1131
15513 1415
Nul♦ I U10 ]S
• L616 2]+16 23CS
!l CS 2315
• 15919 23]6
N Pij 24)3
11p22 SSiS
• 1'. 23 156
1`024 £115
IlS e16 135E
• IS4.7 4630
- _ R520 4h0
120 4113
1513C 5110
• lba)t 5175
15932 `.365
15fi 33 ALES
15,13. 6630
• 15035 6604
1`39 1118
L4]'31 6b2C
•34 l64C
• 1 ° ^39 67°4
LSC43 6?El
'o 1I]itt 6869
• 51743 11t1
1 ^644 ifl3
15445 1420
15656 1525
• ISVS] TPCO
•
•
•
•
MARRANT NECLKIL ON
1ARR 0L1PAhL
ChTE Rt F.NFNLC
T p T • • r = l� r�l! 1 ! qn X14
8/04/62
CISCOUNT NET
55.41
1, L. 3. [
5,t[3. 10
2.
S LCC
2 61.CC
2,751. SC
193.00,
0.60
14.00
144.00
1 50
.50
243.Y4
7H:50
1[.50
41. Id
40.222 e
6 5 , oc
4.5.14
85.00
22.50
9.54
151 6.56
5.10
3.36
31 7.50
bI.51
1.5[U.37
2,
2,
3,
4,
1.
RA* 1
6,5 ee.95 4.
4Y.4e
23.2] I i
40.10
230.62
545.00 19
640.03
151.55
250.00
33.CC
q s r +. • !... "�°ErE'�i��A . n 4 r r, CRS !''<
NO �0 90AAdV A V� 1 CITY RANCMC CUCAMO•N V E h 0 C R h A F E
1 1163 YO IU VE':C'�P Y13. gg!10
15964 6,10 SO CAL f lC1Sih CC
I 1`9b5 Ebli 50 CPI f G45 L:
15 n66 1640 SC Cat I PLAM,ING CChCeES
5
1
p
1
4
E
e
4000CT
, C
I 1 Cu
1C
WARRANT RCCOACIt ICN
yenp 1�tln,
!:nfE P �fii ll, E
f INAL FWAIE
6/04/62
DISCCU14T NET
60,631.43
nn Al
Li.GJ
124.x4
J0
]U. it
4.95
224.)G
4.90
244.40
36 u4
36.14
59. / 4
43.29
6.11
94 38 1 5
11.:5
14.00
,H.L0
8.
28.00
12.00
14.90
11.00
14.00
14.CC
t4.ca
110,394.56
PAO 2
Is
IT
II
I,
I�
I J
_ � I
S, �._... �IR•!7 n[• R + � n 1� A,R •4 +!'° • S e + >,E'y RN +olsRw�w, � ^� k
.11• .r .l..,.1.
APPLICATION SGB ALCOHOL It RVERAGE LICENSRS)
Ie: Oeponm <m of AImFeL[ Be.e.ope
1901 B.end.vy
So<remmr°, Colf.OS610 '1 3F.i "y \: ^ ^':7
.u.........°,......
r6e and «.y.<d 6n.6, opp6n Id
Nom ., dnm6ed of l<II°...
1. TEMS) OF LICENSE(S)
N
qi
ACCEPT NO
SVili
.P
Gore
Jawed
2. NOAEi SI 01 APkICANDS) -0
.11• .r .l..,.1.
APPLICATION SGB ALCOHOL It RVERAGE LICENSRS)
Ie: Oeponm <m of AImFeL[ Be.e.ope
1901 B.end.vy
So<remmr°, Colf.OS610 '1 3F.i "y \: ^ ^':7
.u.........°,......
r6e and «.y.<d 6n.6, opp6n Id
Nom ., dnm6ed of l<II°...
1. TEMS) OF LICENSE(S)
FILE NO.
qi
ACCEPT NO
SVili
.P
Gore
Jawed
2. NOAEi SI 01 APkICANDS) -0
temp. Perm"
24J26
AM 3/1S.F. ,
EFF"Im. Gmo-
BI�6.'.OIr Lind? d 91neY..A r
'
3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTIONIS)
A"
FEE
LIC.
TIRE
.
?-D. ^ce,
L ^,. r.B
20
l Boa:nma
t�isciiluw Ita11An Deli b Gilll
.11• .r .l..,.1.
APPLICATION SGB ALCOHOL It RVERAGE LICENSRS)
Ie: Oeponm <m of AImFeL[ Be.e.ope
1901 B.end.vy
So<remmr°, Colf.OS610 '1 3F.i "y \: ^ ^':7
.u.........°,......
r6e and «.y.<d 6n.6, opp6n Id
Nom ., dnm6ed of l<II°...
1. TEMS) OF LICENSE(S)
FILE NO.
OFF SAL-. it'1°.1 L ql;w
PJOA.
"Aepr<d ena<. p
Ee.ne D
ACCEPT NO
SVili
GEOGRAPHICAL
CODE 3515
Gore
Jawed
2. NOAEi SI 01 APkICANDS) -0
temp. Perm"
24J26
AM 3/1S.F. ,
EFF"Im. Gmo-
BI�6.'.OIr Lind? d 91neY..A r
'
3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTIONIS)
FEE
LIC.
TIRE
.
?-D. ^ce,
L ^,. r.B
20
l Boa:nma
t�isciiluw Ita11An Deli b Gilll
S. Loeellon of BmMOa -Numbs and Sneer
8561 flu. ^.cline
91730 S: 'F °P.C,T.O.
TOTAL
$25.00
6. II Pram.. Li¢mH, 920 -0367 iF. Are ITF-1 II iC9
S6m- Type of Lame Ciq LmNp
8. e lo,di nq . ,Adde. A a diR<reol !rom c Nmber . and She., au_e .c. a. - 1.,,1 - 1701 IN +<I llrvnl
q,
..'R y°. er<r Feen e°nei<red of o I.E.e" -_ _ 10. No.e you ene Th loNd °,y of M. proyiuona of Me AlroM1nlie
! 0..eroq< Camrol An w requlanem of IF. Oeperm.nl RAN.
loimnq o M. AZ
TL E.plmn . "IES' ° n l° n<ma 1 or 10 on °n olmAmem rF¢M1 lMII be de.med Ne, 0 Mo epplir000n.
11. AppLw.r ogreee Inl ibnl any m noger empl°yed m -Te Fcenvd premnea nT Fore °II the ge°lifmliom of IF lk—fet, and
Lb) 11.1 he .•dl Im —I., °r c°ole °I p<rrril to be 11o1°hd_.11 of 11, prenuem of he Mc°F°b< IMe<r°IF Conho: All.
IJ STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ceunly nl S71 7j i13Ri!i;`,RDI::O Pole 7/15/82
Il
Te, n —, AppIINr• X ...u.._. b . +. e.. r n. ye
U .rn
SIGN HERE
CV'J 4.1 r�:a''.' 4t
' APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
S STATE Or CALIFORNIA .Coo" n1 "., TN.L:.:u`ui:1J m1e 7/12/02
e.
1_ N ••rn•ol L_ <_.•.I- :••••A;•r�11y "' ^I• •^: 17 ^SgYiY`f�UFIh1 71t'kV ", `*n!MIiA - -n � lE a <e eNpmb.M
' 71.' „r&l.!I;r, 0. AOIAINISyRAi OY
VIZ, Jc1n V. I JUL P 19P,Z
roLL «ermn „0.61 DAC�'^e.�e esir.�r,,,�chn Cuca:ncSVS�Q 2p tm�AijO - C:aB diE� ".TrDI ;O
n,a'pF lv.Nr Pr I— TbN Linn F'nr lb'Imrlrro-M I OIIT '- - .•u:.,.,.:
COPES MA lf0 ?
❑ Rre _n1 h <.1 O.:e o - R.,f;EI Nn m<' ..r ! ...
T
�e Iw n,..- A:l:- af- ✓.:.wT+FtaR'+q
rW' �. f: r{'rr`I'. �.�. wY (,•.pn.ee•e! kr'.•4r.n
•
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSEE(S)
1. TYPE(5) OF LIUNSE(S)
FINE NO.
R: Oe,11 -1 of Ah"k Pe.vage C-H.1
RECEIPT NO.
Ins O Steen
85175
Saoamemo, Cdd. 95814 San B1naY1:,?
S% OR SALE BEER 4�rT.••
GEOGRAIHICAN
......e. ... .....m . r..,.
GTT::O 1Sl,C2
COD
fbe ard.rd9ned Aere6, OPPLee /or
D.I.
6eeem de.vrbrd ar follow:
Hvoed
2. NAMEIS) Of APPEICANNS)
Applied -,Nr See. 2404 ❑
MiuVIDESr Ant�ala,l, CvatpClina B
Eff ..... 0elw 1/1/32
Eli D.e:
F. nl b; r e ntu Olo, mousy L.
p, TYPES) Of }RANSACiIOy(5)
ffE
tic.
STEER Y STEIN RES.AU.\:ITs 0^
TYPE
N.0
j
l
Manual Coeta• P
r. EV
300.00
41
Co ^na J. Awuta ,/T
-
9BN=iL`T, Slav_..
-
4, Name eI Sm, n'J
'
St6(Ir Stoia Ault uraat of cuea
aaa
5. lxalmn o /So,-- Number and SlIe O�Zl
i AreOiLalA Ave.
ERaniao C.6mooga 91720 $. "S. l"
U. '- ToTAN
B 48A.60
12 Appl' <onr ngreu (a) 16m any -e., employed ie ommb Gamad pre vehei W h.,. .11 the gaabfloram cl o sk and
m
(b) e., 1 .ill n .IF .1 e-. w or permil to be w.I.I,d ony of IM1e prov(.anv 0 r6e All W;e B-1, C-lel A,,
.. ' ... -.. _.. -San 3nrn:.rdi:u _ ..7/14/81
1]. ]LATE OF CALIFORNIA u
FORNIA County of 4444 .. nal.
W.r •.rri. -r M1 rw— ...r
e.wF..r
A
�- .,si'i:i, �uaavri•oe~uipisoiain .............
.,.iu
14. APPUCANT
VON HERE BY % .. .........................'_i ... 4444 ..r �'., .J. ..4444... 4444 ........,....
r,
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR '
S. STAFF OF CALIFORNIA C..., al 1: .. 4444 Ool. ... 4444 ...
w ,.
Mnr
4m�
14I.No 11 "Oe llrlme TAie f, f, l'nr W,..nrlml (',,0,,1, _
Arrae6ed ❑ Recorded nonce.
❑ F.dadah popuv, J .. .__
> - 7/15/82 -.
., r .. ❑ _. _._ 4444.___. �........... 4444.,_
COPIES MMEFO
.+ w .../
"'"^ - -• - - (] Pe. < -al fee el Taid al _'..' If :.. ._ r' Oan an .. Pe<cpr Ho
rtll :w�
MPlKAT1ON FOR AECONOEIC BEVERAGE IICENSEISI
1. dpanmmp of Al-ImIie Ee...... Cobol
.1901 Rolm, Tai nerLYrairLO
$s.mxnla, CWL 93EIe
,e,,..,<.....,. ..^
The..dNO9•ed hereby oppbn.or
III deunbed., Tell..,
1. TYPE($) OF IiCENSE(S)
{M1E NO.
nYP EIIIJB. Bliilt 9l L'4... ^
Applied ,d,, Sec. MIA
E"ll', Dore Ib YCe
RECEIPT NO
...•
GEOGRAP.C11
CODE '.o :-
Om.
.,,.Ad
2, N"E(S) Of APPLICANT(S)
Temp. Perm,
,Y
fle<Ine 0.1. .,,TIRE
UK. Ill ` VD
SOOiE< tI1CLatI •y "'b
T. TYPES) OF TRANSACTION(S)
FEE
A Nnm.ol1a.y 1 rant -nt Cy 2
R., -N.mbv .nd Sr.vr
S. loc.lim, of M
10120 -25 Th. Street
�v
3aZ'LYL9S °�LPC�u°rbPU_',e `117.0 Fea ru rdi
:o TOTAL
3
. 6. If P,.mi,<, Lil med. 9�'I'IT>i2 L A,. P,emne, Irma. yea
She - TT�of L4 n CnY I•min+
. _ E. MoOledd,<.,(d dm<r<III L<m s- N.mb.rold SV<.I 'n.., ✓.
v:f[l+, ., �i,FAea;.u. .yyn.El�Rr• .. 9. - Yo-.• ern been <om nni .7. Felony? 10 No.< Tou Add, ml.led on, of IF< Pro e1 11, Alroheb<
Imnm9 to me A<I?
IT E.plam .'TE$" IdAl To iroml 101 lO on on arb[M1mem nFid Ill.I be deemed All of 'I,, nPlhl.l n
12 , AmAliImll mnlm; To! FIT ony m nogvr vmpfe,.d m o -.le I -med p .ill ml. .11 the o..lifi[o n, .I a h[en, <e, end
(b) III., Fe .ill n 1 mime or m _.r p<Im, I. be Holmed on, of the pm +, on, of "A Al-mi., F-ImSe Control An _
13 STATE Of CALIFORNIA Cw••ry of BC ^3S.A.if.G pma I •••
.N
< w _
.. ..N,: .r ,.,,..., u., .,:..�,. «.•..,. _....._.. CITY dFmANCNOYN[A.nS'.• -m '". ",
u. led ADMINISTRATION+
SION NERE JUL 291982
PAY
- -- APPLICATION BT TNANSif>��dRl�lpl'191�♦1'lI($I�
S. STATE OF CAIIFOATRA Coldly .I
„9 ,
Al
16 Nem•(0 of Ter •^•••r,l, L •'• Y .nu, •• nr IL L9..I...Nl el L:[e "41 10 Ilene, ..ebedll
___ _ _
Ca:,;ann L. ial n
19. lomu.n N•Imbv and Sbeq C,y and Iq Code , CoeIry
nn Nnr m,;o- mdme rr:;I r:,r.; rn, nInILIInn,? r.P onhf
Alml ee ^ Rm.Idnd
71 COPIES MAVD
❑ Rene..l Fee el Ford of OR[e on A... of No,
Quoitm? Mat Ver is Loureo o4J
±lie ,doMe&r Ce2uc,C of 2S E(
ST¢eer hub imemeAe Aleuue.
S
•
_ .. l�euatAL CLaN � l�l¢diutim -{o LO(41 Q'exus�f1 �s�aeerr/A[
e -�
iFdTA[¢.uT �itoRvvlry � dlo2rf! (nnr�R -z
iidSAce.uf�¢o�i¢ra 70 5eu -r6r 2ouea C'_/
Q:M: nrr RIAM I To LuES r 2ouai P—/
Ad Skceur FewkrV -ro fns r 4�tieZ C—/
I
i
i
?l _
F�
Quoitm? Mat Ver is Loureo o4J
±lie ,doMe&r Ce2uc,C of 2S E(
ST¢eer hub imemeAe Aleuue.
S
•
_ .. l�euatAL CLaN � l�l¢diutim -{o LO(41 Q'exus�f1 �s�aeerr/A[
e -�
iFdTA[¢.uT �itoRvvlry � dlo2rf! (nnr�R -z
iidSAce.uf�¢o�i¢ra 70 5eu -r6r 2ouea C'_/
Q:M: nrr RIAM I To LuES r 2ouai P—/
Ad Skceur FewkrV -ro fns r 4�tieZ C—/
I
i
i
0
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council - City Manager
FROM: Finance Dire or
SUBJECT: Liability Insurance
We have been informed by our liability insurance carrier that due to
our past experience, the deductible amount should be increased from
$5,000 to $15,000 per claim, effective 8 -1 -82.
The City insurance company recommends that the amendatory endorsement
be signed. Staff also recommends signing as this will afford the
City insurance company sufficient time (120 days) to possibly find
another carrier who will write the City for a first dollar loss of
something less than $15,000 per claim.
The contingency for first dollar loss to the City for current claims
is $68,700. This figure will not be affected by the increase in the
deductible. What will be affected are those claims that occur after
8 -1 -82, the effective date of the new endorsement.
In as much as the City is, in fact, self insured for the deductible
amount, it will be necessary, at some time in the near future, to
beef up these reserves necessary to satisfy potential claims to
the City that may be lost. Current insurance reserves are satisfact-
ory to meet the $68,700 potential loss, but the increased deductible
will eventually cause a greater demand on those reserves.
�7
ENDORSEMENT
INURING NO, .8 .... .. .. ..... . -TO POLICY NO..� .1045
COMPANY ........ Admiral .Lusuranc.. ... rpany.--- .............. _ ...... _...................
. (herein c,nm "tn. c,mww' ) August 1, 1982
EFFECTIVE DATE ... .. .......... _. ,..... ,...... ...... .. ...................
........
NAMED
INSURED ........ C1 ..ty of.RaU,cho ..Q....0 ..an DSB2 ... ................ I AMNDATORY MMRSE:-ET
n
In consideration of the premiun charged, it is hereby agreed that the
Declarations Page, Item III, is amended to read as follows:
Item III. DEDMIBIE AAAUNr:
$15,000 per claim (including claim adjustment and legal expenses)
as respects Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Errors or Omissions
or Personal Injury or any combination thereof.
All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.
JGa•r � ILIA Y
by
)��a 010�-
A."ined 14p�nb4r•
i
t�^� F q 7 * *INSURANCE
A TEXAS�STOCK COMPANY
A Te. %AG STOCK COMPANY
(herein celled "ADMIRAL')
ND City of Rancho Cucamonga, a
INSURED Municipal Corporation of the State
of California
MAMNG P.O. Box 807
ADDRESS LRancho Cucamonga, California 91730
placing . ....... �'.
..............
CASUALTY POLICY
Ci'r 10 <15
DECLARATIONS
This insurance is issued pursuant to the
California Insurance Code, Sections 1760
through 1780, and is placed in an insurer
of insurers not holding a Certificate of
Authority from or regulated by the Calf
formal Insurance Commissioner,
ILICY PERIOD: From ....._ll, 30 -80 To 11 -30 -83
12:01 A.M. standard Time at the address of the Named InsoreE es stated
In consideration of the payment of premium, in reliance up" Ue statements herein or attached hereto, and sohiect to all of the fermi of this policy. ADMIRAL
glees with the Named In cured as follows:
Item I. COb'ER1GE:
Comprehensive General Liability. THE EMPIRE CO.
COMPLE-E INSURANCE SE>ViCE
Item II. AD`dIRrW'S LIMIT OF LIABILITY: 068 fair N> T Sae.• U.—I. C, 1 91,96
a,a o
(a) $500,000. any one o- currence as respects Bodily Injury, Property Damage, •
Errors or Omissions or Personal Injury or any combination thereof.
(b) $500,000. in the aggregate as a result of all occurrences during each
policy year, subject to the aggregate limit provisions of this policy - see
_ "AIAIIIUL'S LIMIT OF LIABILITY", paragraph B.
r Itcn III. DEDUCTIBLE ANOINT:
$5,000. per claim (including claim adjustment and legal expenses) as respects
Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Errors or Omissions or Personal Injury or any
combination thereof.
Item IV, PRLDIIU!
Estimated Workcrs' Compensation Payroll Rate per $100 Payroll
pl fn0,00it "-
Total Advance Premium Minimum Premium
It cm V. E11!OGSI :Ili \TS A7TAMED AT IIiCl',M *TON:
1. Annivorsary ILito Rndorsement
CDufnera9ned On.... October 29, 1980
Al, ,, thud :!Dnficld, Nay;. J�r<ev
1 100013 1617e1
ILTAL s— • (T) •
JEIISEY'INTLItNATIONAL, INC.
L'ndr'nrfiling Itanngers,
By :— 1 ll ,�� / f ..•.vim..
y /ti!i� XuR,onud Re :ewNalee'
• AGREEMENT
This Agreement for professional services, dated and effective
1982, is a contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a
municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to
as "City ", and James P. Doolin, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant ".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City requires a Draft Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to retain technical and professional
services for the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report for the
Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City has approved the selection of the Consultant
to assure responsibility for performance of the work described in accord
with the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, CITY AND CONSULTANT AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
A. SCOPE OF WORK
• The responsibilities for preparation of the completed Draft
Environmental Impact Report will be divided between the City Staff and
the consultant as shown in the following description:
TASK 1: BACKGROUND
The City will complete all information necessary on the
discussion of the background and scope of the Draft
Environmental Impact Report contained in Chapter 1.
TASK 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City will complete all information necessary on the
project description of the Draft Environmental Impact
Report.
TASK 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The consultant, will identify and collect all information
necessary to adequately describe the existing setting
relative to the issues identified in the Initial Study
Part II, with the exception to the areas of "population ",
"socio- economic factors ", and "land use and planning ",
which will be completed by the City staff.
l
TASK 4: ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES •
The consultant will determine environmental impacts and
identify measures to reduce or eliminate significant impacts
and identify unavoidable impacts in all the areas described
in the Initial Study Part II.
TASK 5: SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
The City will complete information necessary to describe
cumulative impacts, irreversible impacts, and growth induc-
ing impacts of the plan.
TASK 6: ALTERNATIVES
The City staff will describe in sufficient detail other
alternatives to the project and their potential effects.
TASK 7: PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
The consultant will supply the Citv with all information
necessary to complete their responsibilities of tasks as
described above. The City will complete all final typing
of the draft document and prepare graphic material for
printing.
TASK S: PUBLIC REVIEW •
The City will assume responsibility for completion of the
public review process including distribution of the Draft
Environmental Impact Report, collection of comments, and
preparation of responses. The Consultant will not be
required to attend any public meetings.
o The Consultant shall provide the City with three (3)
screen check copies of the Draft E.I.R. for a five
(5) day preliminary review period, prior to printing
of the Draft E.I.R.
o The Consultant shall make a weekly progress report to
the City on the preparation of the Draft E.I.R. and the
execution of other services required by this agreement.
B. SUBCONTRACTORS
Any subcontractors that the Consultant may retain shall be the
responsibility of the Consultant and shall be compensated entirely by the
Consultant.
40
C. TIME SCHEDULE
• The Consultant shall be responsible for completion of the work
described in Section A per the time schedule as indicated in Attachment
A with all work being completed no later than October 1, 1982.
D. CHANGES
The City may, at any time, by written order, make changes within
the general scope of this agreement in the services or work to be performed.
If such changes cause an increase or decrease in the Consultant's cost of,
or time required for, performance of any services under this agreement, an
equitable adjustment shall be made and this agreement shall be modified in
writing accordingly. Any claim of the Consultant for adjustment under this
clause must be asserted in writing within 30 days from the date of receipt
by the Consultant of the notification of change. All corresoondence con -
cerning contract changes will be through certified mail.
No services for which any additional compensation will be
charred by the Consultant shall be furnished without the written author -
izaticn of the City.
COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT
The Consultant shall be compensated for the services provided
under this Agreement in the following manner and in an amount not to
• exceed Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00).
10; of the total compensation within ten (10) working days of
the establishment of an account pursuant to the execution of this Agreement.
15'; of the total compensation upon completion of work in Task 3
of this Agreement.
25'; of the total compensation upon completion of screen Draft
Report and duties assigned and agreed to in this Agreement.
50; of the total compensation after a review of the information
and materials submitted pursuant to this Agreement by the Consultant, such
revica period not to exceed ten (10) working days following submittal by
Consultant of all required information and materials.
TERMINATION
The City may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice
thereof to the Consultant, provided that the City shall be obligated to
pay Consultant for all work performed. The amount of this payment shall
not exceed the increment of the total fee to which the Consultant is
entitled according to the above scheduling for tasks completed, plus a
percentage of the next increment, which would be payable for the next
task, equivalent to the percc.ntane of work completed by the Consultant
on the neat task, prior to receipt of the Notice of Termination by the
Consultant.
Ir
G. INSPECTION •
The City, in reference to any request for payment submitted
by the Consultant for services under this Agreement, shall have the
right to examine and audit the records of the Consultant to verify
such payment.
H. AUTHORITY
Each of the parties to this Agreement represents the person
signing on behalf of such party has authority to do so.
I. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES
It is understood that the contractual relationship of the
Consultant to the City is that of an independent contractor, and all
persons working for or under the Consultant are their agents, servants,
and employees, not agents, servants, or employees of the City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Consultant have executed
this Agreement as of the date set forth herein.
DATE
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT
CIT'i AT -TO RIJEY
Y
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY MANAGER
ATTEST:
CI TJPI Y PLANNER
PA L, Jra mes P. Doolin
•
F-1
Etiwanc eci
CONWI -ANT
EIR kORR
PROJECT SC14EDULE
' TASK
2
G 9 13
16 20
23 27
30
EP
"' 6 10
� Co11;s�zn4�ie
Resource fla GCrial
m��Ti�
ILLWIIII
p t
n�I�Itl�l
111
C t Staff Co I. to
[IIIIIQII
_eC0'jPCL�c:SLYlrlr inn
1
I'I {"�1'I
"'IIIII�'
--
I-
i Cif Staff fcmP.lz to Envi
mental Settings; Land o -5
I'lll�'I�I
II�IIIIIII
--
�ce_oc.i cc.
--
--
�COIlS�:l ran ''em 1PS� nv-ro7 n_
r.:ental Settinc Descriptions
IIII�III�(IIIIL_
- :nusulta
of Lpac s 3 mitigations
�_
Illlltllll
p
IIII
4aasures
111011
Cons u 1 tar. t Cp:r.El _ete Screen
itaff Review & Conment
Cnnc rl re f RZY15i nn and
nmpletion of Draft Environ-
--
ental Report
STAFF REVIEW !-
'4 27
O
1 4 8
C T O B
11 15
E R
1D 22
25
[IIIIIQII
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1982
F 4j�
TO: City Council and City Manager �`
1977
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF BONDS TO REPLACE CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT FOR
OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENTS - OWEN LOFTUS - LOCATED AT 8968 ARCHIBALD
AVENUE
Owen Loftus has submitted the attached bonds and agreement to replace a
certificate of deposit accepted by City Council on August 19, 1981 to guarantee
the installation of off -site improvements for the expansion of Willow School
located at 8968 Archibald Avenue.
RECOIIMENDATION:
It is recommended that City Council accept the above described bonds and agree-
ment and release thecertificate of deposit accepted on August 19, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
vLBH:l3;C: bbccc
Attachments
:a r
I_
Lm
0
8968 ARCHIBALD AVE._
5 - A9cl tu
i
5 Al 90. Y. M/L
slxtll
CTV 017 RANCI 10 CUCAN IONGA
ENGINEERING Dj\'ISIOX
VICINITY NIAP
A
N
0
CCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR
8968 Archibald Avenue
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made
and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal
Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of Calif-
ornia, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City,
by and between said City and UP; I OFil r 'li
hereinafter re erred to as the Developer.
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested
approval by the City of 8968 Archibald Avenue in accordance with the
provisions of the report of the Community Development Director thereon,
and any amendments thereto; located on the west side of Archibald Avenue,
approximately 300 feet south of 8th Street; and
WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be
met by said developer prior to granting the final approval of the
development: and
- -- " WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of •
improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City
Attorney', are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said
requirements for the purpose of securing said approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City
and the Developer as follows;
1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's
expense all improvements described on page 3 hereof within from the
date hereof.
2. The term of this agreement shall be 9 months, commencing
on the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be
in default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated,
unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. The Developer may request additional time in which to
complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than
four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of
circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of
such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions
hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and suf-
ficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments
thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein.
4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the
provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right it any
time to cruse said provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and
thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full
cost and nxnonse incur ;ed in so doing.
S. Enern a rhmem. permits shall be. obtained b': the Developer
from the offic,• of the City Frain••er prior to start of any work within
the pub] i7 right -of -way, and the developer snail conduct such work in
full rompli,ince with the renulations contained therein. Na n-c COP 1un
may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the
Penalties provided.
6. Public right-of -way improvement 'work required shall he
constructed in conformanm: with approved improvement plans, Standard
Specifications, and Standird Drnwin,;s and any special amendments
thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other
ineidcntal work dean,l necessary for drainaqu or public safety.
0
I. Work done within exrstina streets shall be diligently
pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any
and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to
recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his
contractor by any lawful means.
E. The Developer shall be responsible for replacements
relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system
in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and the owner of the water system.
9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all
loose rock and other debris from the public eight -of -way resulting
from work done on the adjacent property or within said right -of -way.
30• The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as
directed by the Community Development Director,
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer
to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be
subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of
said improvement security shall be not less than the amount shown
below:
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED
Faithful Performance Bond $2300.00
Material and Labor Bond $1150.00
• -
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these
presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities
required by 11 w on the dates set fort:., opposite their signatures:
DEVEIOPER
BY: // L /�''a`C4l DATE: July 21. 1952
BY: DATE:
WITNESS: -� ! DATE:7??�2_
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,MONGA, CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
BY: MAYOR
ATTEST: CITY CLERE
CI-: aF RA:2lla
CONSTirCTTON A:D nnao F57r1:KC •
ESCFO.AC.N?MT 7EMIT FEE SC:1F.D-LE
(Atoeh m •,.,,a.eror's Cepv'')
OATS: ] /1] /8, REMIT NO. COMPUTED BY J. $Mfa
File Reference 8958 Archibald Ave. City Drawing No.s
NOTE: Dees not inelede 1.rr.nt f,e fer writing per it or pavement replace-
.... deposits.
ITS4)! QVANTITY,
UNIT
I!SIT Cas
t inn nn
TOLL CO %5T^•'rTIO,, COSTS
nn
FAITI!'UL P!NVOMANCC 90311 (100:)
12300.00
r.f, q,•.
I,. F.
EACL`:F.ERII:G INSPECTIIIN FEE.
5175.00
n!.. R..
L. F.
MON-MENTATP'l POND (CASH)
_0
L. F
S. F.
r ,r.n.ach" 74n
S.F.
aAd'. fn•m 0
S.F.
Nat � I
^'�
P. a•acm
vro,n rn a nn�„ su pernde I
5.:
(r
I. L7. i..ver npn,. 1
roll:
ION
V.C. P:nd,•r °iln [o Onp r I
70a
. nand .: ;nn r rl
Tne
1" rN Cx ,.i rn: er I
F.A.
..r r ca:vos co mane i
ea.
Grrec F
!0.
]A.
I
'
1
i
I
I
I
1 1
1
1
COYSTRUCTIOI COST
3210].00
CONTINGENCY COSTS
t inn nn
TOLL CO %5T^•'rTIO,, COSTS
nn
FAITI!'UL P!NVOMANCC 90311 (100:)
12300.00
TANP AND MUTERi.AI. 0,3Z (502)
11159.00
EACL`:F.ERII:G INSPECTIIIN FEE.
5175.00
(FEE SCIIYDL'LC)
MON-MENTATP'l POND (CASH)
_0
I
•
I I .
FAITHFUL PEDF07XM4 E 90.10
",%J 12SH 563 613
PREISCN $5 0.09
RRECDTED ID DuTLICAU
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and o•J&: WFIDS, III
(hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete Cer-
tain designated public improvements, which said agreement,
dated , 19_, and identified as
project 8968 AdW1 &1LD AYEH ..
is hureoy re.erred to and made a part hereo_; mad,
P.'HE:'.EAS, said principal is required under the terns of sail
agrcener.t to furnish a bond fot the faithful per'_ormance of said
agreement.
ROW, TY.EREFO.FE, we the principal and MRICAR WTORISTS ISSU'RA.SCE
SOHIAAY , as surety, are held and
firmly nouns unto the city o5 Rancho Cucai .¢•.,^.Pa (herein. f('¢ cal L ^d
"City"), in the penal sum of 1'{i0 LiOL'SA& tl6:i0RED MD :dr1Jo-- ----
----------------------------------
__ Collars 1 ) lavfvi
money of the cniteu States, for the payment o; -which sw, well and
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, sus cessars, execu-
tors and a d.,ir.i.tr.tor., jointly and severally, fir -ay by these
presents.
RCE:J !
The Condition of this obligation is such that if the above
..
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
cessors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide
bye and well and truly keep and perforce the covenants, condi-
tions and provisions in the said aaicemer.t and any alterati=
tharoof . -ade as therein provided, on his or their part, to he
kept and performed at the tite and in the manner therein spec-
---
iflad, and in all respects according to their true intent and
meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers,
agents and cr ployees, as therein stipulated, then this ebligatio..
Shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and rer..air. in
full force and effect.
As a raft of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included
costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at-
torney•s fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to th ^_ ter, . of the
agree ^nnt or to the work to be parfoi'ned thereunder or the seec-
ificeticno accivIT IMying the same shill in anywise affect its
ahIia It:ons on this bond, and it dace hereby waivo notico of an,
such chance, esronsron of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the agreement ar to th•` work or to the specifications.
Iii WI^::CGi iJil i. pi :p F, . is ,. ,, ^.e nt has been duly esecutud
by th,3 pn :;pa Fdl and Suroty ahe, n1ined, an u.,
_ -
,V`2RIC Ls :kCc%tSTS LIS'uRUC' CO�AVY
d.::,i WFTU.S, ttL
R, d. I'A ;C, All IA ISF[x -Y, :C
RCE:J !
9osn MM 563 539
\ PAIN. I.1a. It; PLU. 00 \D
119DP :1l1J :tATCRSAL:IEN BO::C
the City Council .1 the City of Rancho Cuss onna,
Stara of California, and
(ta rc iaaftcr designated as pan., :pu "7 nave entered lot. an
agreement 'whevcby principal agrees to install and complete cer-
tain designnt^ -d Public inprovenents, which said agreement.
dated 19, and identified as pro -
jccr 9968 ARCtlI NALO AIT.it2
is h-r ro�cacd to and mace a part hereof; and,
1!LF Cd S, under the terms of said sorest, pr i. ^.c ical is re-
,
i:rod before entering upon the perforeanceof the war¢, to fIl_
icrd and sufficient payment bond with the City of P.anc o claims ca-
...n., -. soc a :e the claims to which reference is made in Title 13
(es-cancing with section. 3052) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the
Gi• :il code of the State of California.
now, T Lc O.'.`_, said principal and the undersigned as a
cor_o :ste surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of P.ancuo
C.:vamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material -
men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
acroereat and referred to in the aforesaid Cede of Civil Procedcre
is the sun of
Jail. :rs (i f itt '1:1 ), or il.a Cerr'�
furnisnec or labor thereon of any kind, or Eo: arounts due once:
the unenploynene Insurance Act with re sped to such pork or labor,
that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the
sooner hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brass -t
nd
span this bo will pay in addition to the face ac o
uunt thereof,
Costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable st-
torney's fees, ince end by City in successfully enfcrc!ne, such
oblicaeico, ro be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed
as costs and to be included in the judcnent therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and aereed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (cormencing
with Sacion 3052) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so
as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit
brought unon this bend.
Should the condition of this bond be fully perfoced, then
this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be
and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
ten:ien of tin^ alteration or sd.'.ition to the tarns of said
agzeur,'. or t c
specifications a rangin the same shall in
n
an•: niun, affect its obiigatiasan ^ g a
this bond, and it does heru-
b7 walra notice of any sur:h chnnge, extension, alterstice or ad-
dition.
It; c :I T::'.'. _` %NIEPCO'c, this instre ^,ent has been duly executed
by ihu pn .eii+al an;.0 re ty above named, on
19 d3 1 i
G):SAf1'
AY.RICA'. ORUT ^. i :tSt;:R,l' :,:1:
��,
Sw -a t9l-ror.,iil, -
by; ,r.r ._.__— __,_J.•
R. G. P,vn, AR9i:: L''fL: -FAGS
RCS?4
N
0
•
\J
, T.m .,
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1982 Op
T0: City Council and City Manager
1977
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND BONDS FOR M.D.R. 82 -08,
CHINA ALLEY RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT 8270 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
Gary and Margaret Bougher and Gerald Broyles have submitted the attached
agreement and bonds to guarantee the completion of on -site improvements for
the China Alley Restaurant located at 8270 Foothill Boulevard,
RECO!'MEfiDATION:
It is recommended that City Council accept the above described agreement
and bonds and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same.
Resoect Fully pbmi Cted,
LBH:B4c
Attachments
• RESOLUTION NO, -)I/ '
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITv FOR MINOR
DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 82 -08
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed
on August 4, 1982 by Gary and Margaret Bougher and Gerald Bronles as
developer, for the improvement of the real property specifically des-
cribed therein, and generally located at 8270 Foothill Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in
said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred
to Planning Commission, Minor Director Review No. 82 -08; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied
by ;nod and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and
• said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
0
ATTEST:
Lauren t1. 'Aassernian, City Clerk
r +`
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
0
0
•
�tr�pq tito�
o" CITY OP R:\ \CI IO CUCAMONGA minor Director
Review 82 -08
o ENGIVI ;.IiRI\(; DIVISION
ti'i I
�_e
VICINITY \IAP
L
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made
and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal
Code and Regulations Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California,
a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Ci t}•, by and
between said City and �.Pp{e p
AmD (y+.r-� *' Bac rP air hereinafter referred to as ehe Deveio pe r.
WITNESSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has regcested
approval by the City of Minor Development Review No. 82 -03, is acccrdacce
with the provisions of the report of the Community Development Director
thereon, and any amendments thereto; located at 8270 Foothill Boulevard;
and
WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be
met by said developer prior to granting the final approval of the
development; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of
improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the Cit_:
Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said
requirements for the purpose of securing said approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the of ty •
and the Developer as follows:
1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's
expense all improvements described on pace 3 hereof within 9 recths from
the date hereof.
2. The term of this agreement shall be 9 months, commencing
on the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be
in default on the day following the last day of the tern stipulated,
unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided,
3. The Developer may request additional time in which to
complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than
four weeks prior to the default dace, and including a statement of
circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of
such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions
hereof, inc ludinq r struction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency
of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when
warranted by substantial changes therein.
0. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the
provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any
time to cruso swirl provisions to be cmmplcted by ,my lawful means, and
thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full
cost and expense incurred in so doing.
5. The developer shall provide the parking lot improverents
includinq A.C. paving, curb and planter construction, and pavement
stripping, is shown on the approved Site Plan for Minor Development
Review No. 92 -08.
6. The d••anl olx•r shnll proviJr m.^on�inry emergency access
to the rear of the property, suhlnct :o I'cnchil1 Fire 11,toction •
District standards and rcgotrenents is requtn•d with the approval of
Minor OC!'clOpm,nt Rrvtuw No. 52 -09.
0
7. The Developer shall provide all on -site landscaping
and irrigation as shown on the approved plans Minor Development
Review No. 82 -00.
E. The developer shall remove the existinc non- tenforning
China Alley freestanding sign which is located in the right- of-way
at the southwest corner of the property. Such sign shall be removed
when improvement work within the right -of -way commences.
9. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement,
relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system
in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and the owner of the water system.
10. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all
loose rock and other debris from the public right- of-way resulting
from work done on the adjacent property or within said right -o.' -way.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer
be guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject
to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said
improvement security shall be not less than the amount shown below:
IMPROVEMF,NT SECURITY SUBMITTED:
Farthful performance Bond 529 - BOB
Material and Labor Bond Sld.Snp
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
BY:
MAYOR
CITY CLERR
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the
parties hereto
have caused these
presents to be duly executed and
acknowledged with
all formalities
.
required by law on the dates set
forth opposite
their signatures:
DEVELOPER
BY:e'/:.LJt - h' /v.'L�
DATr: /S ;.
�
/
BY; i � i� �...�
DATE: Ii /:' �v ^,
- --==f— _
WITNESS:
DATE:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
a municipal corporation
BY:
MAYOR
CITY CLERR
File Reference DR 82 -OB Ciq' D'A.i, D.
ROTE: Does noc Snclude Curren[ fee far vri[ine pe rr.i[ o: pvvenen; rCRlace-
mCll[ tlCDOSi[5.
CDRSTR'.'CTION COST ESTI;:1T£
ITEM
�60::S
UNIT
r ;:11T COST
C C•nl n;
=] C:IO::
AFJ Er•:0 5Sa'L \TE
1 .F,
E)ICRO.\C:I:I E;:T
:`rR:f:
(.1¢adr [O
"'spelt or's CO P1' ")
P.C.C. Cc.e nnI" 6" C.F.
DATE:
7!11!82 PEFIIT ::0.
COYPCTCD BY C.
SchnS[on
File Reference DR 82 -OB Ciq' D'A.i, D.
ROTE: Does noc Snclude Curren[ fee far vri[ine pe rr.i[ o: pvvenen; rCRlace-
mCll[ tlCDOSi[5.
CDRSTR'.'CTION COST ESTI;:1T£
ITEM
ItWiTIT?
UNIT
r ;:11T COST
C C•nl n;
1 .F,
P.C.C. Cc.e nnI" 6" C.F.
L. F.
V.G BCm 1110n mnl
e Ar,rnrcM1
^
S. F.
Y" i`f. 1 v fu:Ie[
S.F.
Street E r ration
I
4 vo [[eu .`:noan kc,en[
C.l.
Pry -A rat iPn of Su ncr ade
5720
s
Biu .00
S. SF.
F.
I.C. L]011r ro ns )�
TOS
'.. C. SIO cn 13.90 r
TON
ardor Sn
i IN
'DO eon 1 1
1Oi
:OR
1 60.011
F -20.o0
s. F.
66.00
1 S 0 n
,..11. a
.ld1 t 81,11 C.D. ;C ernee 1
ET.
Add, ;roe falvos to C,ld, i
EA.
A.
street Tree,
1
t - tD
sr
~
rkinc I t 5<'[ i
Le
r.00
i rcco: of Ron -confo r, ca
iO n, nn
P[o vide E oncv f1L$ Lane
LS
2.0 •.00
I
I
i
1
COYSTRCCTION COST
- . CONTINGENCY costs 2.7 71.00
TOItL f.D : :S ;i, :; :T.a: cos ;5 28.Jnn.an
WAIT[,,,. FEr FORMA \CL BOND (: cn'.) .nn 0n
IA00B ANN !LITI.CIAL BONN (50;) \] rnn n
EN;INLEI;IHO INSPECTION rEE F
(FEE SCRFDL9.E)
40ATIECTATION BOND (CASH) 0
r -7
i
•
0
•
LO5- 073028
FAITHFUL PERFOZMANCE BOND
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and 04,•i .U. 9ouer Gerald T. Broyles b Na -caret a -
(hereinafter designated as principal ") have entered into an agreement
whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated- -BOUg:
public improvements, which said agreement, dated
1982, and identified as project =mvr ove"'Cr,is at 9 'n2 _ tope *.u]�L'r�.
is ereby referreoT �o and ode a part
WHEREAS, said priniipal is required under the terms of said
agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said
agreement.
NON, THEREFORE, we the principal and Balboa Insurance :o.
, as surety, are held and
firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called
'City "), in the penal sum of Twenty -Nine Thousand and 00 /100
Dollars ($29,000.00) lawful moneys the Un'lfed — State s, —the eat
of which'som well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs,
successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally,
firmly by these presents.
The condition of this obligation is such that if the above
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and
well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and pro-
visions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as
therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at
the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects
according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and
save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein
stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; other-
wise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition
to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included cos [s
and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's
fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all
to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Igranccnt
or to the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications
accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this
bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of
time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the
work or to Lhe specifications.
+ A IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed
by the principal and surety above named, on _1u15' l5 _. 1982.
Balboa nsurance ro
—
lainrnry In .act
LOS- 07)020
LABOR AND M.ATERIALHEN BOND
J
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
State of California, and ,.
(hereinafter designated as pri cvpa n ) have enterea vn to an agree..enr
whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated- Souq`c
public improvements, which said Agreement, dated , 1982,
and identified as project Improvements at 8270 Foocn —T7. T—vd- _
is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; an
WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is
required before enterina upon the performance of the work, to file a
good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing
with Section 1081) of Part 4 of Division l of the Civil Code of the
State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a
corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga
and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materialmen and that
persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid acreement and
referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of
Fourteen Thousand Five Hundred and 00 /100
Dollars (514,500.00), for materials furnished or la or n of arty
kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with
respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in
an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in
case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face •
amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including
reasonable fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such
obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as
costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond
shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and
corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 frormenciry with
Section ]082) of Part 4 of Division l of the Civil Code, so as to live
a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon
this bond.
Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then
this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and
remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of time, alteration or additicn to the terms of said agreement
or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect
its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any
such change, extension, alteration or addition.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed
by tho ptit,lpaj and surety above named, on July li , 1982.
8alhoa insurance Co.
Attorrry in :act
•
n
L
•
•
nTMv nP n A ATOM nr TO n A VnMO n
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 42 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Joe Stofa, Assistant Civil Engineer
�°,,.,_... tic
2 9
I �I 6
F
Ut
�s- I
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -33 - POLY PLASTIC PRODUCTS
Poly Plastic Products has applied for a building permit for the expansion of
their office complex at 10220 Fourth Street, Rancho Cucamonga. The conditions
of approval for the office expansion are to install street lights and sidewalk
adjacent to their property along Fourth Street.
To guarantee the installation of the off -site improvements, Poly Plastic Products
has submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance $10,000
Labor and Material $ 5,000
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution and accept
the Improvement Security and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and
accept the Improvement on behalf of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:J be
Attachments
• RESOLUTION NO. )�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR
REVIEW NO. 81 -33
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed
on July 12, 1982 by Poly Plastic Products as developer, for the improve-
ment of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically
described therein, and generally located at 10220 Fourth Street, Rancho
Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in
said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be
done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred
to Planning Commission, Director Review No. 81 -33; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied
by hood and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said
Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
• of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and
said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the
Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED t:iis 4th day of August, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren Fl, ';lasserman, City Clerk
n
J !
Jon D. Ilikels, Mayor
6,55.
ol 1=1�175te
Cl not
tit
Street
plg`:
ANING
CITY OF RA�IC' C O A
A
tAi;- ?
ENGINEFRIN DIVISION DivisioN
VICINITY %lAl'
tit
Street
plg`:
1
BOND 90: 0350 051030 BC*
PREMIU8 180.
FAICHCCL PE.IFOMMICC 00:10
Y.RCREA5, the City L'.anCil of the City of Rancho Cucamonm,
SUtp pf California, and POLY PLASTIC PRODUCTS
Iheretnaftc- designated as prime pal "1 have entered into an
agreement whereby principal agrees to install And complete cer-
tain designated public impeovements, which saida :eemect,
dated , 19 and identified as
projcc` I-
REVQ NO 8�3
1s ..Ilea/ re.e[rCC to and mane A part hereori and,
VHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said
t to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of s,.__
agreement.
NOW, THEEEFCRE, We the principal and THE AETNA CASUALTY
Fe—iVRLTy ' surety, are
Rancho Cucaronca (her_ ±wafter called
"C: "), in the penal sum of Can Thousand and no /100
0ol lars IS 10.000.00 s '' "lava!:
mes.^ ov a e•lrnitcc AS iz to s, sfo: the payrent o; wn:cn sun we'll acd
truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu-
tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents.
The condition of this obligation is seen that if the above •
bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators,
successors or Iasi..., shall in all things stand to and abide
by, I- well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi-
taons n.
a _ ore ^�slcns in the said AlVa"ent and any alteration.
[hr. :cot, -ache as therein provided, on his or their part, to be
:opt a-- p_:fOrmcd At the tine and in the manner therein RISC-
" end rn All resoeces ace Crdaca to their Lr u e•intent and
se Ln :n'' Ind shall indemnify and save ha :.less City, its officers,
acests and anployees, as therein stipulated, then this oblicati.m
shzll b ^_--me null and void; other,i,C, it shall be and remain in
and effect.
As a part of the Obligation secured hereby and in additin
o
tc thofeea aceunt specified therefor, there shall be included
Colt: and ce asonr.nle expenses and fees, incl udi no reasonable At-
torna ^'s fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing seen.
obli:ation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment
rendered.
The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex-
tension of t1:RC, alteration or addition to the terms o', the
aq r�cx r.c or to the week to be performed thereunder 0, the ,pec-
i •c r:--' ccenpnnyi— t),, same .hall in anywise affect its
obl:ga cvu: :ion thI : bond, and it doos hereby waive notice of any
su c!,
ton-'10-1 of ti1e, alteration or addlLion to the
rrecmont or to the wo r!: or to tho s,U.iri.Oti.na,
this insL umrnt has been duly executed
by the pr: : ::; i1 Ind surety abo•m man ^d, on JULY 12
POLY PLASTIC PRODUCTS
Pt lnclp al �_ 1
By
r
AAET_A CASUALTY A SURClY CO.
re
JE a�i L, PEOan, A. in
BOND `:D: 83SB 051010 Bed
• PREMIUM - -- INCLUDED
UGOR :010 !t TERILL: =: 20:A
11H:,M'kS, the City Council of the City of Rane. ^.o Cuea- onea,
Strata 0; California, and Pm' rlaaac PROP '¢s
(herebn.eter d.ar..ated as "pr :nc :pal ") nave enterea r.to an
agzecnant whereby principal agrees to install and ccnplete cer-
taln designated public improvements, which said a reem,
dated 19 , and idendetified as p
jeer RE VIEN Yo 81 -3]
1s :_. c :once to and e.cc a pact n..._ :; ale.
Y:N_3v,S, under the terms of said agreement, privdpal is -
se:zed L•e Care entering upon the cerformanoe of the work, file
a g d sufficient payment bond with the city Of RanUOO �
- „ - -
n
moco�to saccre the claims to Irhich reference is made in Title 13
0--r..anc :ng With Section 305:7 of Par: 4 a- Jivisicn 3 of t”
Civil cede of the State Of California.
Nevi, T, E-ORX, said principal and the undersigned as a
Corrorate surety, are held firv!y bound unto the Ciq/ of
Cuca-,cn;a and all cor.tractnrs, subcontractors, laborers, material -
men and other persons em.l.yad in the perc.n ance of the aforesaid
areem.nt anal referred to in the afoC i9 Cede o'. «C � � «��p yry ;a
in the sum of Five Thousand and no3gS$•••
- ... .. a « «..«...• Collars or for ), due
• urn labor thereon of any kind, e• :oz scup is due under
the Unemployment Insuranc¢ Act v h respect to such work nr ]
that s -ety will pay the same in an amount not exbeedinaa` • e
amount hereln-hove set forth, and also in cese suit is brcac :-t
ucon s bead will pay in a • tics to the fade a-r_nt them ^.
cc3L a-d roesu rash L= e :. :pevs_s a. -.d :x s, 1.clual..s reasecab ie fees, incurred incurred by Cs ty in successfull; `
e.. ^,2c sidu suc-
r ucn�, Aso be awarded and eked by t wort, and - „--
a5 _:;
ctc and to be included in the judcrosrt there:: rendered.
•
It is Mreb/ esnrass!y stipulated and aa_eed that this bond
bnnef t of a,%. and all persons, cecoanies, and
:ceceuan, entitled to file alms under Title li (c omn end nc
B
wi ci: S tio.•. 30011 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Cade• so
no to o:v,• A rig:.' of action to them or their assigns in any sure
br- .,r,,t uccn this bor.d.
5Flou!d the candition of this bend ba fully perfcrced, then
the obL ac :on shall bdco.0 nail and 'ro otherwise it sholi bd
and .-team bra full force and effort.
Tile surety hereby stipule tas and agraee that no change, eR-
tun:.icn e° ti,.o, alteratlon or n c tc ttv terms of s y
_.. Win•
or t.`,n c ^Ca�a n;r; ::o the - shall in
dcas hero -
b': Of an:: .l:Ch C : :J nn,`, altc-151r1:1. .1lt1latiCn or ed-
dyL1U:.
T•. e[C:CO; aDi:P!:0:', this :ostrumen'. ins !seen
by Lh.: .. i:.a a::d surety lh,v • nomr•d, en _JylY -3.
Bi
PLA4P!C ^GOUT :nTS_
�n'ILne9N
�,
TII F. , \f.TYA n.,1S l'nL T'. F 3CR':TV CO.
(l1 Il i Vii/
B !_,
—
dSlneas —
le an, i.. Ii town, . \t[o rn ey -ln -Fact
RCE11
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this acceament is wade
and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Hanicinal
Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of Ca'i-
fornia, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City,
by and between said City and Brooks Products, Inc. hereinafter referred
to as the Developer.
WITNCSSETH:
THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has recvested
approval by the City of Director Review No. 81 -33, in accordance wits
the provisions of the report of the Coranunity Development Director
thereon, and any amendments thereto; located at 10220 4th Street,
Rancho Cucamonga; and
' .1 WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be
met by said developer prior to granting the final approval of the
development; and
WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of
improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City
Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said
requirements for the purpose of securing said approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the Cdt�
and the Developer as follows:
1. The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's
expense all improvements described on pane 3 hereof within 6 mon.tbs
from the 1a--c hereof.
2. The term of this agreement shall be 6 months, cor„-.encing
on the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be
in default on the day following the last day of the term stipulates,
unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided.
3. Tha Developer may request additional time in which to
complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than
four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of
circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of
such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions
hereof, including construction itandsrds, rost estimate, and suf-
ficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments
thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein.
4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the
provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the rryht at any
tim•• to :aid pr0'aaian6 to be t-mmVlotud by any lawful means, and
thareuper. to reccver from said Developer and /nr his Surety the full
east and exile nse incurred is so do iny.
5. F,mcrooc!:ment permits shall be obtained by the Develcpar
from the offlcn of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within
LLe public right -cf- '.say, and th•• developer shall conduct Such work in
full ccm : ;!Iinc^ with thn regulotrons contained therein. Non- compliance
may in Stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the
pnnaltr -,s pinvided.
6. Publiu right -of -way inprovom••ht work required shall be
eeostructed in :.nfurmanee with npp,o,od improvement plans, Stamlird •
SPo':ifrcauoes, oral Standard Draw;nus and a ny
r: p•r.ral an�n<! ^cots
therotc. ('Ons"Intlen shall incba Je any transitions ,inrl /or ocher
incidental work deemed necessary for driina,:e or public safety.
L
7. Work done within existinq streets sha-1 be diligently
pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any
and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to
recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his
contractor by any lawful means.
B. The Developer shall be responsible for rep!acenent,
relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system
in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and the owner of the water system.
9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all
loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way resulting
from work done on the adjacent property or within said right -of -way.
10. The Developer shall plant and maintain parkway trees as
directed by the Community Development Director.
11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Cevebcer
to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject
to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of saris
improvement security shall be not less than the amount shown below:
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED
Faithful Performance Bond 510,000 _
Material and Labor Bond $ 5,000
a municipal corpora pion
BY: , MAYOR
ATTEST:
DATE:
•
CITY CLERK
,.
IN WITNESS HEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused these
presents
to be duly executed
and acknowledged with all formalities
•
required
by law on the dates
set forth opposite their signatures:
DEV F. LOPER
//� �
/\-- �.i
,(
L /� DATE:
�__
BY:
DA -r.
WITNESS:
`re.��,(`!�
DATE: ]%.�
irrY OF RANCHO r't'ChMONOA, CALIFORNIA
a municipal corpora pion
BY: , MAYOR
ATTEST:
DATE:
•
CITY CLERK
CAT[: ]/]/82 PETItP ::0. ._J`_J St S• Sto °a .i [.
FLI, R.f,, 4th Street 0([] ors.
NOT.',I Oats m[ inlludl vu cr -n[ f.e f., 1111 ,4 ,.r It o c_en. rep!.m,
nenc .. sics.
CONSTRVCT104 COST F.ST:I M
CONSTRUCTP011 COST
CP:S ufL F..:iY COSTS
TOTAL CO ::T "n I:CT ION COST5
FAM:::6 PlRF0MANC7 , FlO:IJ (100.)
.1':P IL\T..: [I I. i2CM (3011
$9,". Oo
925.00
510,000,00
$10,000.00
$5,000. go
$500.00
-0-
0
•
0
nYTV nV n n nTOUn OTTO n n,rnwrnn
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
F:
U _
19917 77
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF
VINEYARD AVENUE FROM 8TH STREET TO ARROW HIGHWAY, FEDERAL
AIR URBAN PROJECT M- MG- R194(2)
Over a year ago, design work was completed on this project for the reconstruction
and widening to four lanes of this portion of Vineyard Avenue. Also included
in the project are traffic signals at Arrow Route and improvement of the
A.T. & S.F. Railroad crossing near 8th Street.
Since completion of plans, the project has been delayed by sanctions against
Federal -aid road work by the Environmental Protection Agency and by delays in
re- financing the federal program. Money has been re- instated now and
authorization has been received to advertise the job.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to advertise
the work for bids on August 6, 1982.
Respectfully submit ad,
LBH:bc
Attachments
STATE OF CADfORNIA- 51)51NE55 AND 1RANSPORTAVON AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN IR., CoNn
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION },
DISTRICT 8, PO. Box 231 P
•SAN BERNARDINO, CALIfORNIA 9101
July 26, 1982 08- SBd- O -RCuc
Vineyard Ave from
8th St to Arrow Rte
M- MG- R194(2)
.. W i "1 ..0 � ♦/
Mr. Lloyd Hubbs
Ji1�
City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr, }lubbs:
Your request to advertisethe above- referenced FAU project on
August 6, 1982, and open bids on August 27, 1982, is approved.
The final plans and specifications have been reviewed and approved
and you are authorized to administer the project in accordance
with the Local Programs Manual.
• Regarding advertising and award of the project, please be advised
of the following Federal requirements:
1, Prior to advertising, submit 7 sets of the Plans and
Specifications to this office.
2. Submit one copy of the first advertisement.
3. After bid opening, submit a list of all bidders with their
bid price and item -by -item breakdown (5 copies), noncollusion
certifications, and a project advisory letter.
4. If it is necessary to issue addendums during the advertising
period, the addendum must be approved in advance by this office.
5. Upon your request for our concurrence to award the contract, we
shall review the bid data and, if we find it in order, we shall
send you approval.
Should you have any questions, please call Bob Hall at (714) 383 -4579.
very truly yours,
/ /Z /y7� L 7
A. G. HUDGM4S
is Chief, Local Assistance
A
U
J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Release and Acceptance of Bonds
Tract 9290 - Located north of Lemon, west of Hermosa
OWNER: Vanguard Builders
9211 Archibald
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Release of Monumentation Bond $4,700.00
Certification from the project engineer indicates that all final monuments
have been set and that he has been paid in full.
Tract 9589 - Located on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive abutting
and west of Cucamonga Creek
OWNER: James H. Markle
432 Culver Blvd.
Playa Del Rey, CA 90291
Release of Monumentation Bond $3,000.00
Certification from the project engineer indicates that all final monuments
have been set and that he has been paid in full.
Tract 9356 - Located north of Highland Avenue and west of Hellman
OWNER: Kingswood, Inc.
1442 Irvine Blvd, Suite 224
Tustin, CA 92680
Release of Monumentation Bond $1,080.00
Certification from the project engineer indicates that all final monuments
have been set and that he has been paid in full.
continued...
e/0
City Council Staff Report
Release of Bonds
August 4, 1982
Page 2
Tract 9262 - Located on the west .side of Vineyard south of Base Line Road
OWNER: The William Lyon Co.
9613 Arrow Highway
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Accept
Improvement Agreement
Accept
Reduced Faithful Performance Bond
$20,000
Accept
Reduced Labor and Material Bond
$10,000
Release
Faithful Performance Bond
$136,800
Release
Labor and Material Bond
$68,400
Reduced bonds are sufficient to cover remaining off -site improvements and
it is recommended that the reduced bonds be accepted and that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized to sign the new Improvement Agreement.
Tract 9193 - Located on the west side of Vineyard south of Base Line Road
OWNER: The William Lyon Co.
9613 Arrow Highway
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Accept Improvement Agreement
Accept Reduced Faithful Performance Bond $10,000
Accept Reduced Labor and Material Bond $5,000
Release Faithful Performance Bond $69,600
Release Labor and Material Bond $34,800
Respectfully submitted,
fiLd�i Lr�( /.��,
LBH:bc L
Attachments
ill
I_1
•
•
16
•
►'1
L i
nTMv nn n A NTn TTn!T Tn A A ff .-n.
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer._ %!',•
VACATION OF UNNECESSARY STREETS, AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE
VICTORIA PROJECT
This item should be continued to the special meeting of August 9, 1982 to
be considered concurrent with the tract maps.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:bc
,.,
0
E
is
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 4, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Dev.
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: VACATION OF CERTAIN EQUESTRIAN EASEMENTS
WITHIN TRACT 9440
BACKGROUND: The public hearing for this item was
continued from the July 7, 1982 agenda to provide
for full Council attendance regarding this item.
Attached is the July 7, 1982 Staff Report and a letter
from several property owners opposing the vacation.
The City Attorney has stated that vacating the
easements would require 1006 approval of property
owners within the tract, because the easements were
recorded for the benefit of all property owners.
Therefore, should Council approve the vacation of
certain equestrian easements, it would still require
the approval of each property owner within Tract 9440.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City
Council review and consider all material and input
relative to this item. Attached is a Resolution to
vacate certain easements, should the Council find it
appropriate to do so. Should this be the case, it
will be necessary to specify which easements are
approved for vacation.
submitted,
„
Director of
JL:DC
Attachments: July 7, 1982 Staff Report
Letter From Property Owners Opposing
Vacation
Resolution
0
10
n tmv nn n n w.nvn rrrn A AAI �O.A
STAFF REPORT
U u
DATE: July 7, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: VACATION OF CERTAIN EQUESTRIAN EASEMENTS WITHIN TRACT 9440
SACRGPO'JND: A petition to abandon the above - mentioned easements was
submitted by twenty -eight (28) of the forty -one (41) homeowners within
this tract. These property owners object to these easements primarily
because horses are not permitted within this subdivision. Secondly, these
property owners object to motorcyclists using these easements causing fre-
quent noise disturbances. Tract 9440, Exhibit "A ", consists of 45 half acre
lots (41 have been built) located on the west side of Hermosa, between Banyan
ano.Jilson. Each lot has a 20 or 25 foot equestrian easement along the
rear property line, as shown on Exhibit "B ".
The City Council adopted Resolution 82 -97 on June 2, 1982, setting the
date for public hearing on July 7, 1982. Subsequently, a petition
from homeowners within the tract was submitted to request postponement
of the public hearing to August 11, 1982. Notices of hearing to vacate
the easements have been posted at the site and mailed to surrounding
property owners.
The equestrian easements were required as a condition of approval by
the County, and were recorded with the final tract map. Therefore,
abandonment of the easements requires approval by City Council, which
has jurisdiction over the recorded map. Copies of the petitions and
a Resolution authorizing the vacation of certain easements have been
attached for your review and consideration.
AIIALYSIS: The major issue is the effect that the proposed vacation
�iouTd _ have on the Master Plan of Trails adopted in the General Plan,
Exhibit "0 ". The proposed abandonment must be found consistent with
the General Plan trail policies. According to the City Attorney, where
Local reeder Trail easements provide access to the Community Trail
system, any abandonment may be inconsistent with the General Plan.
Further, the General Plan policies listed on Exhibit "E" encourage the
type of easements which are proposed to be eliminated, Approval of this
abandonment may set a precedent for future abandonments which could
affect the integrity of the Master Plan Trail System.
Vacation of Certain Equestrian Easements
City Council Agenda .
July 7, 1982
Page 2
As shorn on Exhibit "C ", Tract 9440 is bordered on the east by the exist-
ing Community Trail along Hermosa. Also shown are surrounding approved
tracts with Local Feeder Trails which will connect with subject easements
in Tract 9440. The easements located along the northerly and southerly
tract boundaries will provideaccess to the Community Trails for Tract 9440,
and surrounding tracts.
The primary reason listed in the petition is that the CC &R's prohibit the
keeping of horses. The easements are defined by the CC &R's as being for
the use of animals, pedestrians, and service vehicles. Although horses
are not permitted with 'the subdivision, the CC &R's may be amended by a
majority of the property owners to permit horses or other animals that
could use the easements. The petition cites two reasons which seem to
be associated with only the easements along the south boundary of the
tract: nuisance and indiscriminate use of the easement to gain access to
the flood control basin. People are using the flood control basin to
ride motorcycles and dump trash. The basin is unenclosed with many points •
of access. The use of the trail for access to the basin could be mitigated
through construction of limited barriers at trail entrances.
EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE: The northerly and southerly easements in
Tract 9440 provide an important east /west linkage between the Community
Trails and the Alta Loma Channel and along Hermosa. Thereforp. the
Equestrian Advisory Committee primarily recommends retention of all eques-
train easements in said tract. In the event that the City Council wishes
to seek a compromise, the Equestrian Advisory Committee recommends the
retention of those easements on lots 1 -9 and 31 -38 would be appropriate
in order to maintain the continuity of the trail system.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review and consider
a1T ma terra and input relative to the General Plan Trail policies, the
Equestrian Advisory Committee input, and the input of those residents listed
or. both petitions. Attached is a Resolution to vacate certain equestrian
easements should the Council find it appropriate to do so. Also, the City
Council may wish to postpone the public hearing on this item until a later
date as per the request of the property owners on the petition dated
June 12, 1198r.
Respect,fully submitted,
'L l'- ��L
JACK LAM, AICP •
Director of Community Development
JL:DC:jr
Attachments
tl �
• RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF CERTAIN
EQUESTRIAN EASEMENTS WITHIN TRACT 9440, LOCATED ON
THE !JEST SIDE OF HERMOSA, NORTH OF BANYAN, AS SHOWN
ON MAP V -019 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 82 -97, passed on June 2, 1982, the
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its authorization to
vacate certain equestrian easements hereinafter more particularly
described, and set the hour of 7:30 p.m. on July 7, 1982, in the Lion's
Park Community Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons
objecting to the proposed vacation; and
WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and
place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
as follows:
SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence submitted
• that certain equestrian easements within Tract 9440 are unnecessary for
present or future Master Plan of Trails System purposes, and the City
Council hereby authorizes the vacation of those certain equestrian
easements as shown on Map V -019 on file in the office of the Clerk of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a
legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by
reference made a part thereof.
SECTION 2: The property owners within Tract 9440 shall cause
all necessary legal documents to be prepared for abandonment, and cause
said documents to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of
San Bernardino County, California.
SECTION 3: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption
of this Resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
•
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE VACATION OF
EQUESTRIAN TRAILS IN TRACT NO. 9440
All those certain strips of land, 20 and 25 feet wide in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
shown as EQUESTRIAN EASEMENT on the plat of Tract Map No. 9440 as
recorded in Map Book 144, Pages 33, 34 and 35 in the office of the
County Recorder of said County.
•
•
0
CITY OF RAINCHO CIrr VVI0 \GA
5rAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager 1977
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT; REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS
A number of months ago the City Council reviewed an ordinance imposing a
fee payable at the time of application for a building permit on parcels
that are affected by a reimbursement agreement. Ordinance No. 170 was
given first reading by the Council but second reading was continued to
allow staff time to investigate the idea of some adjustment to the cost
of such reimbursements and develop a notification procedure for affected
property owners.
The attached Resolution would establish a policy with respect to the pay-
ment of interest on reimbursement agreements and establish the notifica-
tion procedure. This resolution has been reviewed by the Building Indus-
try Association and their response supporting said Ordinance and Resolution
is attached. The Council had also asked what other jurisdictions do in
regard to reimbursements. With the adoption of the attached Resolution,
Rancho Cucamonga would be breaking new ground in regard to adjustments
for general reimbursement agreements that apply to street construction.
While some water and sewer agencies provide both administrative charges
and certain adjustment provisions for sewer and water facilities, we are
not aware of any jurisdiction providing cost adjustments for street im-
provement reimbursement.
Attached please find the staff report provided to the City Council on
April 7, 1982 establishing a proposal for a fixed 10 percent per annum
adjustment and the reasons why. After continuing discussions with the
Building Industry Association, there is now mutual agreement that if an
adjustment is to be considered, the fixed 10 percent per annum would be
acceptable.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt second reading of Ordinance
No. 170 and if the Council desires to include an adjustment to the reim-
bursement sums, the Resolution establishing policy with respect to such
adjustments also be adopted.
lly submitted,
Community Development Ou•ec for
JL:jk
Attach.
• ORDINANCE NO. 170
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IMPOSING A FEE PAYABLE
AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT FOR
THOSE LOTS OR PARCELS OF LAND WITH RESPECT TO WHICH
FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED PURSUANT
TO A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Chapter 12.08 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code is amended by adding Section 12.08.075 thereto to read as
fol Ions:
"Sec. 12.08.075. Reimbursement agreement fee.
"If a frontage improvement was constructed under
or pursuant to a reimbursement agreement between the
City and another person along a street adjoining a
lot or parcel of land on which a building, or other
structure requiring a building permit, is to be con-
structed, altered or enlarged, then:
• "(a) The applicant for the building permit shall
pay to the City, at the time the application is sub-
mitted, all sums necessary to pay the reimbursement
sum apportioned to such lot or parcel by the terms of
the reimbursement agreement; and
•
"(b) No building permit shall be issued until
the sums required to be paid by sub - section (a) of this
section are paid. ".
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same
to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least
once in the Dail Report, a newspaper of general circulation, circulated
in the City of F.ncho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
,�..7
• RESOLUTION NO. / 7
.A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
POLICY WITH RESPECT TO PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: Various provisions of state law and City ordinances
allow the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enter into reimbursement agreements
with developers and subdividers of real property in the City when those
developers and subdividers have installed public improvements which are
of supplemental size or capacity or which otherwise serve property not
included within the boundaries of the subdivision or development.
SECTION 2: In order to alleviate the financial burden imposed
upon developers and subdividers by reason of their installing, at their
initial expense, public improvements which have supplemental size or
capacity or which otherwise service property not included within the
subdivision or development, the City Council finds and determines that
a reasonable rate of interest should be paid with respect to amounts
subject to reimbursement.
• SECTION 3: The City Council determines that a rate of ten
percent (10; per annum simple interest is fair and reasonable and
all reimbursement agreements entered into between the City and a
developer or subdivider shall contain provisions for interest at said
rate, unless otherwise specifically determined by the City Council.
SECTIM 4: The phrase "all sums necessary to pay the reim-
bursement sum apportioned to such lot or parcel by the terms of the
reimbursement agreement" as that phrase is used in Section 12.08.075
of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, shall include interest imposed
at the aforesaid rate or as otherwise determined by the City Council,
SECTION 5: Whenever a reimbursement Agreement is to be
entered into for a development project, specific notice shall be given
to all affected property owners as for the provisions of such proposed
agreement. A copy of the proposed agreement shall be sent by certified
mail to all such affected property owners at least 10 days prior to the
date said agreement is approved by the City.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
•
•
Bi
Saidy uiew c.motm
bu:d,ng induscn, assa�aticn of southern catfornia, :nc.
duly ls, 19e2
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Box 807
9320 Baseline Road, kC
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
ATTE:1TIp?:: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer
RE: Ordinance 170, Reimbursement
Dear Mr, Hubbs:
After our review of Ordinance 170, Reimbursement Agreements, and its companion
resolution setting 10% as the recommended interest rate for construction reim-
bursements; we feel it is appropriate that the B.I.A. indicate our support of
both documents.
We recognize this ordinance and resolution as a long overdue procedure which
will provide ecuity to earlier development improvements when later development
occurs. Further, it will not incur any costs to the City or to taxpayers; but
will in fact make it somewhat easier for the city to induce developers to
provide additional improvements in certain instances (flood control and drain-
age more specifically).
Our hope is that the Council will adopt the Ordinance and resolution as pro-
posed.
Sincerely,
CY, ,vei'n: DiOClynr
'21: nd
1150 H S1111�am Avg DII A S11 207 Re: rosenun
UU'nnd CA 91786 (714) 991 -2997 or 946-2869 9 all 01 San AHBa and t County
M Alli "ale 01 the NAHB and the CBIA
,. r
- ORDINANCE NO, 1 S
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
1077 - 421 -06 FROM A -1 TO A -P FOR 2.045 ACRES OF LAND HITHIN
THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE EAST
SIDE OF HAVEN, BETI•IEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CHURCH
STREET
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
followinu:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
• B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C, This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessors Parcel No. 1077 - 421 -06 consisting of 2.045
acres, generally located on the east side of Haven,
between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street, is re-
zoned from. A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to A -P (Adminis-
trative /Professional).
SFCTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall causr. the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 1982,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
r
� 1"
0 ORDINANCE NO. /]y
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
201- 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63, 65 AND 69, LOCATED BETWEEN
HAVEN AND HERMOSA AVENUES, APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET SOUTH
OF WILSON, FROM R -1- 20,000 TO R- 2 /P.D.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
• C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 201- 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63, 65
and 69, approximately 57.7 acres in size and generally
located between Haven and Hermosa, approximately 660 ,feet
south of Wilson, is hereby changed from R- 1- 20,000 (Single -
Family Residential - 112 acre lots) to R- 2 /P.D. (Two Family
Residential /Planned Development).
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall muse the same to be published within fifteen (15) days
after iLs passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1982.
AYES:
• NOES:
ABSENT:
n .r
J '
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c ICA,Wo
STAFF REPORT 9
�'
F
p c
FI' U ° Z
U';. >
1977
DATE: August 4, 1982
TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 80 -11 AND CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT - NEEVA - The change of zone from A -1 -5
Limited Agriculture) to R- 1- 20,000 (Single Family
Minimum 20,000 Square Foot Lots) and R -3 (Multiple
Family Residential) for approximately 65 acres of
land located on the south side of Wilson Avenue,
east and adjacent to Chaffey College and extending
south to Banyan.
•
BACK'GROUND: The request for the change of zone and the preparation
of the Environmental Impact Report are the result of a request to
develop 8 single family residential dwellings and 508 multiple family
residential dwellings. The Planning Commission has been working since
September of 1980 with regard to this project and the development of
the Environmental Impact Report. Subsequent to the Planning Commission's
requirement for the preparation of the EIR, the project has been revised
from the initial proposed 662 dwelling units to a total of 516 dwelling
units. In addition, the Planning Commission has held hearings and has
recommended certification of the final Environmental Impact Report,
approval of the change of zone, and has approved Tentative Tract 11550.
The approval for Tentative Tract 11550 in contingent upon the City Council's
approval of the change of zone and certification of the final Environ-
mental Impact Report.
Attached are Resolution of the Planning Commission on these determi-
nations and the Staff Reports relating to the project. For finaliza-
tion of this project, City Council action is required on the change of
zone and final certification of the Environmental Impact Report.
Attached is an Ordinance to approve Zone Change 80 -11 and a Resolution
which certifies the final Environmental Impact Report. The Environ-
mental Impact Report is included in the City Council packet. A compar-
ison of the project exhibits within the EIR and those which have been
approved by the Planning Commission indicates a significant difference
in the project. These changes were due mainly to public input and
findings of the EIR.
n .r
J '
Zone Change 80- 11 /Neeva
City Council Agenda
August 4, 1982
Page 2
Should the City Council choose to move forward on this project, then
certification of the Environmental Impact Report should be done first,
followed by the adoption of the attached Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATIDN: The Planning Commission has recommended certification
of the final EIR and adoption of Zone Change 80 -I1.
Respectful y s bmi tied,
K�
—'JAC AM, AICP
Director of Community Development
JL:MV:jr •
Attachments: Planning Commission Resolution 81 -85
Planning Commission Minutes July 22, 1981
Planning Commission Resolution 82 -67
Planning Commission Staff Report July 14, 1982
City Council Resolution Certifying Final EIR
Ordinance Adopting Zone Change 80 -11
•
5��
RESOLUTION NO. 81 -85
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF A
FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED
FOR A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT CON-
SISTING, OF 662 DUELLING UNITS ON 65 ACRES OF
LAND GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
WILSON, ABOUT 1/2 MILE EAST OF HAVEN -
APN 201 - 191 -07 (REFERENCE: TT 11550 AND
ZONE CHANGE 80 -I1).
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1980, the Planning
Commission determined the need for a Focused Environmental Impact Report
for the above - referenced project; and
WHEREAS, such Focused Environmental Impact Report has been
prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quaility Act guidelines;
and
WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1981, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED:
Section 1: Findings: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission
does hereby make the following findings:
1. That the Focused Environmental Impact Report, with modifications
as recommended in the attached Staff Report, adequately
addresses all areas of reasonable environmental concern.
2. That the significant adverse impacts identified in the
Environmental Impact Report will be adequately mitigated
through the application of mitigation measures recommended
for inclusion in the final Environmental Impact Report.
Section 2: Recommendations: It is therefore recommended that
the final Environmental Impact Report, with modifications, be certified
by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2211D DAY OF JULY, 1981.
PLA'I!NNGG CoP!MISSIO; OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
�V ice -Chla i/r�m/Aa nf^',I
Sncre [a ry of thr Planning Cocttnission
J /
Resolution Flo. 31 -85
Page 2
I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1921 by the following vote to-
wit:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
Sceranka, Dahl, Rempel
None
King, Tolstoy
rl�
•
•
•
� c
Mr. Williams stated that residents currently have problems with some of
the older, senior, residents of the rest home and further stated that the
• problem would be compounded if the cul -de -sac was permitted.
Poilovin, brief discussion, it was moved by Sce -antra, seconded by Dahl,
ca: :iud, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -84 amending the conditions of Director
Rertvw 79 -63 requiring a cul -de -sac for Parcel Map 5545.
Vicechair...an Rempel voted no, stating that public access should be
maintained at this location.
AYSS: MI]MISSIONERS: SCERANIKA, DAHL
NOES: COPMISSIONERS: REPEL
ABS-:;T; COMISSIOERS: KING, TOLSTOY -carried-
F. NEE+.A SIR - (Reference Tentative Trant 11550 and Zone Change No.
80 -11) - Consideration and review of an Environmental Impact
Repo :t (EIR) prepared for a residential condominium project con -
sistir..; of 662 dwelling units on 65 acres of land generally located
on the south side of Wilson, about 11 mile east of Haven. APN 201 -
191 -07.
Mr. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, and Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner,
• revic•. ;ed the staff report and EIR and asked the Planning Commission to
look at the EIR carefully to see if the impacts are addressed fully and
adve:ncaly Ind, if so, to make a recommendation of certification to the
Ci:v Co.: nci 1. Mr. Vairin also asked that the revised site plan be ex-
ani::ed to see if this is the direction that the Commission had intended.
Mr. \routil reiterated that the purpose of this meeting was to look at
the EIR and not to have any formal action on the project itself. He
asked that anv additional measures towards mitigation be forwarded to
the City Council. Further, that through the reduction in this project's
density, there would be mitigation to some degree of many of the concerns
expressed relative to this project.
fir. Kroutil stared that in staff's review of Chu EIR, it was felt that
in general it addressed those areas that needed to be covered. Hawnver,
he added that input has been received from several agencies and individu-
als, and as a result, staff is recommending additional mitigation mrnsures
before the Focused E.I.R. is fon:nrded to thr City Council. These include
mews ;uv: in Uhl' dren,; of project density, trtffic and circulation, and
prujec: comp:: tibili [y. Mr. Kroutil recommondad that visual consolidation
of open spara be considered as well as conditions to be sure that wot,:r
q:i.:iity i.. ,n,t. Althou ^;h the inporrs on air quality, loss of naruraL
%,,ot. r:ton, Lira scr;icer:, and rl =,,ational services wmild be inereasod,
`,ruff f,•Lt that thoy would not be si,;nificant enough individually, but
th.,: •:hoald by lol,k.d It a:: a whale.
•
Planning fa ^_�issi a:; `ti nu -10- July 22, 15�',1
Vice-chairman Repel opened the public hearing.
dlr. Larry Wolff, architect for this project, stated that both he and the •
ovn.cr feel comfortable with the staff report. He indicated that his
offica has been modifying the site plan for the past 4 -6 months and
expressed his appreciation for the input from Mr. King, who prepared the
EIR on this project.
Mr. Wolff stated that this project is a great deal more flexible than
what had been proposed originally because of the decreased density and
the change in the type of units. He indicated that some three -story
units, single family along Wilson, and two -story units are now incorporated
into the plan and that the three -story units would contain subterranean
parking, lie spoke to Commissioner Tolstoy's concern for open space and
stated that because of the change in unit design and the use of three -
stor•,, structures, the feeling of open space was accomplished. He indicated
that his fiw was fairly open - minded about the final design of the
structures, but that they would like more time in which to soften the
loo" of the three -story buildings.
Commissioner Rempel asked where the stadium was in relation to the
projoct site.
Mr. I[clff replied that it was approximately 3/5 of the way down and was
surrounded by the athletic field and maintenance.
Mr. Rempel asked how many units are being shown. •
Mr. Wolff relied that it is just under 8 units per acre for a total of
approximately 520 units.
Mr. Rogor Sudduth, 5695 Canlstel, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he would
confine his co scents to the EIR indicating that several months ago
Comnissionor Tolstoy addressed the cumulative impacts of the Neeva Tract
on the entire area and felt that they had not been sufficiently looked
at 41 the Draft EIR. He indicated that the traffic situation was not
adequately exanined especially in the area of Haven and Wilson. Mr.
Sudduth also tOOIt issue with the number of students that were projected
aml indicated that he felt that this had been understated.
Mr. Sudduth expressed his concern for safety of the people who ride
horr;us and live in the Deer Creel: area who would he affected by the
%ecva Tract, Further, that there was no montion of horses and their
iT,pnrt in this report. He asked if conoideration could be given to
oprnin:: n Sttact at the south end of the tract to siphon off traffic
that would cnrnt.rict Chu current roads that serve the Door Crc Ok tract,
altl;ough hr understood the economic difficulty of doing this in the
first phd;;e of deve•lppment.
:Ir. S;;Jduch stotad his concurrence wide staff su¢gestjous relative to
projoct corpatihility. Ilowrver, he addod, that the residents of Deer
Creek "'cold like to avoid oxcessivr hoii;irts of buildinl;s in the northern
and of [hv tract, Jr. Snddu th indicated that there was no issue with •
Plannin; Corvni;sion Minutes -ll- July 2 ", 1981
the line of sight in the building shown some 300 feet south of Wilson
• on a 7 -8 percent grade, but asked consideration for the concentration
Of throe -story buildings to occur on the southern portion of this site.
On the issue of fire Safety, water quality, and recreation, Mr. Sudduth
felt that staff has shown a great concern and was confident that the
Plae.cing Co-:nission would as well. Mr. Sudduth commended both .staff
and the Commission for their effort and stated that the residents of
Dour Creek very much liked the plan presented by Mr. Wolff this evenin -.
Com^issioner Sceranka stated that he was not sure what Mr. Sudduth meant
on his point of copulative impact of the EIR.
Mr. Sudduth explained that they had been sub- optimizing inasmuch as there
are presently some 300 acres approved for development at Deer Creek and
all of the units and the proposed Neeva Tract will add to the traffic
at 1:iison. He stated that they are only asking that whatever assumptions
are ,ado are node relative to those things that were not assessed in the
Draft E.I.R. The population at Deer Creek has increased and it is expected
to increase further and this would be an impact on this area.
Co-nissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Sudduth if his view to the south was
impaired by this proposed project.
Mr. 5udduth stated that there would be no problem as far as he was con-
cerned. The only problem would be the traffic problem.
• Co^missioner Sceranka asked what route do the horses take through Deer
Crock row.
•
Mr. SWtd'uth explained the original six miles of trail and [hat cu rrencl }'
thi-rc are nine milts of trails and the use of street easements for the
ani: -nls to walk on. However, Mr. Sudduth explained, that the horse
population has increased substantially since the last hearing on this
proj,•ct.
Mr. Jim Deri.auriers, biology teacher at Chaffny College, explained the
nature area that in the only one of its kind in the area. lie pointed
out that with further development, this area would be difficult to
keup in its present state. He spoke of the destruction of the area
caused by the intrusion of youngsters who were not aware of what this
anon is and asked consideration for some kind of fencing along the north
side that would holy to preserve Lhis area from further intrusions.
Mr. C. Roshan, 110 ?8 Wilson Avenue, who stated he was a horse owner,
of the difficul Ly for horses and cars to get along; and the increased
trnffiC that will result fra:Ti this; project. He asked chat the Danyan
entr.incc land etenuioo hr put in as quickly is pmsihlc.
Plannin,l Com- ission ttintuos -12- July 22, 1931
Mr. Bob Glennon, 5675 Canistel, expressed his concern for his three
chu n dre who ride horses and the increased traffic. He explained that
is
while an adult nay be able rn handle a horse spooked by traffic, it is
dir :icu'_t for a child to do the same.
Commissioner Sceranka asked why I•lr. Giessen had purchased his home in
Deer Creek.
Mr. Giessen replied that it w ?s because it was equestrian - oriented and
lie wanted his children to have the opportunity to ride horses.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Wolff stated for clarification that he wanted to develop the eight
single- family homes first and that as far as the first phase at the
Wilson side of the project was concerned, he felt that 70 hones would be
a cc-.pronise. Further, that it was good that the residents of Deer
Creek realized the economic factors in not being able to develoo south
first and developing off of Wilson in the beginning.
Mt. indicated that she was glad of the response to the proposal of
throe -store buildings. He explained the site plan and the variety that
havir.q several different heights would afford to the overall plan. Mr.
Wolff Braced his willingness to work with the college in protecting the
open space and nature area indicating that both the college and project
had a similar problem.
•
Co- '.nissioner Dahl commented on the equestrian problems and stated that
the Plannie.,, Commission had set up an Equestrian Advisory Committee to
study each project to be sure that there was access and compatibility.
Further, that the new General Plan addresses this and Elie area of Wilson
has been marked as a community trail with Banyan as well. He indicated
that nothing will be done with the ueeva project until the Committee
has had an opportunity to look at Elie project for safety factors. Mr.
Dahl expressed his appreciation that Mr. Wolff was willing to decrease
the number of three -story units in the northern area and further stated
his agreement with staff's proposal on the Fla and stated that each
iten should be looked at strongly.
Co-nissioner Sceranka stated that he agreed with. the comments made in-
chiding those of the residents. He indicated that there would be dis-
cussion on the site plan and staff's recommendations and felt staff's
reconmendstion for additional mitigation measures were adequate.
vice- chair -,m Roll"!] stated that to a large dearer this project is the
result of p -+aplo werkin, to; ether. lie indicated that the people of
Doer Creek, Cl.aftey College and the developer have made great strides
in gvttinr, thin -;s done. III indicated his agreoment with the Sraff Report
and with t..a con,.erns chat they he:ird, and noted that the addieional
mitiggation mea ^,n ro r., as outlined in the Staff Report, would adoquitoly
addro•ss .ur: prohl,mis.
•
We+�
ONE
�yOV
Planning Coraission Minutes -13- July 22, 1981
Mo [Jon: Movcd by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously to
• ad or Resolution No. 81 -85 and the Draft EIR recommending certification
to tin Ci[ :• Council with additional mitigation measures as noted.
Pit. Sudduth asked if the EIR and conditons would be modified as suggested.
Mr. llroucil stated that it would but that there was to be clarification
of the phasing on this project as it was rather loose at this point.
Vice- chairran Reipel stated that Mr. Wolff was willing to work somewhere
between the GO and the 80 units in the first phase before the Banyan
extension must be put in, and asked if the residents would agree with
that.
Co:maissioner Sceranka stated that not everything would be done at the
stage of the Environmental Impact Report and that the site plan would
both answer a lot of concerns and present some new questions. However,
he felt that with the mitigation measures proposed, this would be worked
Out.
10:00 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed.
10:10 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened.
• OLD nCSI ES&
•
RESfiL i;TrO:; SETTING ST,WDARDS FOR B17FFERIN6 BEIVEEN SINGLE FAMILY AND
DUMPSIENTS
Notion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to
continue this item indefinitely.
! x * x x
Nr.:. HISINESS
VI RESOLCTION ON EOCESTRrAN ADVISOF.Y M NITTEE STANDARDS
Mr. l.im ,rated Chat these standards would fornnlize the guidolines for
the oprratior. of Chs GOWTni CLOe. lie indicated that if the Planning
Commission felt fh:.t it addresses the typo of admini::trative ropul.itions
that 1.. •. i., :, Fnr r.hi': Conrrrtco, than it rhauld .Wept the Standard.
Comm :.;: io ro•r Scurnnka asked ii [hare is any problem with a Councilman
not bath; tho chairman of this committee.
Coup, il:nnn Jim Frnsr ropli,,d Char. he did not think it important that ,t
City (:Jnncil ;wmbper 1'; not chairin:; thIt; Go ^mitten as it is a PIIn(I in;;
Crn,w t; ^ion function• Ile ind icat,sl, howovor, that cha Cl Cy Council ,inn 1;
PIn nr is +; Co, °:n it;!; inn )1i n.iee; -1:.- July 22, 1941
/ r.
RESOLUTION NO, 82 -67
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COiMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE
NO. 80 -11 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM
A -1 -5 TO R -1- 20,000 AND R -3 FOR 65 ACRES LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON, ADJACENT TO THE EAST
BOUNDARIES OF CHAFFEY COLLEGE AND EXTENDING SOUTH
TO BANYAN - API! 201- 191 -07
WHEREAS, on the 1st day of August, 1980, an application was
filed and accepted on the above- described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 14th day of July, 1982, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised Public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the
California Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made
the following findinas':
•
1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses
permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access,
size, and compatibility with existing land use in
the surrounding area; and •
2. That the proposed zone change would not have sig-
nificant impact on the environment nor the surround-
ing properties; and
3, That the proposed zone change is in conformance with
the General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found
that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the
environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on
July 14, 1982.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the
California Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recur, ,rends approval on the 14th day of July, 1982,
Zone Change No. 80 -I1.
2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that
the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change
No. 80 -I1.
�� 3
Rcsarjnon ;o. o _Oi
Page 2
• 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and re-
lated material hereby adopted by the Planning
Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY, 1982,
PLP.AMING COMMISSION OF THE CLT'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY
on
1, JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July, 1982, by the following vote-to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Rempel, McNiel, Barker, Stout, King
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
l�l
CITY OP RANCHO CUCV%l0 \G,\
STAFF REPORT
1977
DATE: duly 14, 1982
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 80 -11 - NEEVA CORPORATION - A request for
a change of zone from A -1 -5 Limited Agricultural -5 acres)
to R -1- 20,000 (Single Family Minimum 20,000 Square Foot
Lots) and R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) for approxi-
mately 65 acres of land located on the south side of
Wilson Avenue, east and adjacent to Chaffey College -
APN 201 - 191 -07. Related File: Tentative Tract 11550
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: This request for the change of zone
is in conjunction with the development of 516 dwelling units on 65
acres of land located east and adjacent to Chaffey College on the
south side of Wilson Avenue (Exhibit "A "). The development project
consists of Tentative Tract Map 11550 which is also on this agenda
for your review and consideration. The existing site has an
agricultural zone of A -1 -5. As can be seen on Exhibit "B ", the
R -1- 20,000 square foot zone will be located along the north boundary
of the project for the single family lots, and the remainder of the
property will be zoned R -3. Property to the north is presently
developed and zoned with single family residential development on
large acreage lots. To the west is the existing Chaffey College
campus; to the east is Deer Creek Channel; and to the south is unde-
veloped land, The General Plan designates this area for residential
development at the Low Medium Density of 4 -8 units per acre.
ANALYSIS: The project site is large enough in size and appropriate in
shape to accommodate the types of uses that would be permitted within
this zone. The zone change, in conjunction with the development plans,
indicates that adequate provisions are made for appropriate development.
The change of zone is consistent with the General Plan as well as
the site development plan which indicates a density which is within
the range of the General Plan,
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing
to The Oail s_ Je rt newspaper, and property owners within 300 feet of
the subject property have been notified of such hearing. To date,
no correspondence directly related to the zone change has been received.
ITEM C
ZONE CHANGE 80 -11 - NEEVA CORPORATION
• Planning Commission Agenda
July 14, 1982
Page 2
RECCXXEN OAT I ON: It is recommended that the Planning Commission
consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such
consideration, the Commission can support the findings, then
adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate.
Res ectfully submitted,
(Jce� V ---
OMEZ
Planner
RG: }1V:kap
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
• Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Resolution
•
i
dam c;pe
Sy �
'kgeGnws b" ®—
�t•Ghat(ey.Ak +Co' •5�7 +oara'w'r ,quw •
`�.Pw, ..
�� � .al.e Y. ]SO•.d•
NORTI I
CITY O
RANCHO C'L "C.1Z1O \G�l rrl:.v:?G E4-ll
rrrl_r: ! CCAT Ott --------
M�
PLA\;VINc, uit'f.Slc }� A
L \f11RiT: rl SCA LE: .�5.
/. T
0
C
CITY OF ITEM: ZG tq)
1t;1\C'I 10 CL'G1IN 10. \C:1 TITL47 � MAN
WILY TANEUI m6s
b?VM 14 +20:aw
FftFtSED Cmvs
AND 2-06 ZOUZ
NO RTIi
CITS'OF RA \CI1O CCG \CIO \G.k car ^`,o
d0 ��
STAF1' REPORr <�
DATE: July 14, 1982 >�
F•
T0: Members of the Planning Commission c:
1977
FRON: Rick Gomez, City Planner
BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11550 - NEEVA - A residential project
consisting of 508 condominiums and 8 single - family dwellings
on 65 acres generally located on the south side of Wilson,
one -half mile east of Haven Avenue in the A -1 -5 zone (a
change of zone pending to R -1- 20,000 and R -3) - APN 201 -191-
07. Related file: Zone Change No. 80 -11.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project consists of 508 condominium
units units arranged in clusters around open space areas and 8 single -
family residential units on one -half acre lots along the northern boundary
of the project. The 'project site consists of approximately 65 acres and
is located on the south side of Wilson adjacent to the east boundary of
the Chaffey College campus and extending south to the proposed extension
of Banyan Avenue. The project site is presently zoned as A -1 -5 (limited
to agricultural uses on minimum 5 -acre lots) and the General Plan desig-
nates the site as residential use at a density of low - medium (4 -8 dwell-
ing units per acre). A change of zone to R -1- 20,000 and R -3 is pending
and is also contained on this agenda.
The multiple- family units are arranged in two and four -unit townhouses
and a twelve -unit condominium structure. The dwelling units range in
size from 1255 sq. ft, to 1669 sq. ft. The site slopes generally in a
southerly direction at approximately a 7 percent grade and is presently
in a natural shrubland vegetation condition. Deer Creek borders a por-
tion of the project along the eastern boundary.
This project was originally viewed by the Planning Commission in Septem-
ber of 1980, at which time the Planning Commission required the prepara-
tion of an environmental impact report (EIR). Since that time, an EIR
was prepared and certified by the Planning Commission in July of 1981.
As a result, the project has been redesigned to comply with the findings
in the EIR. The project was originally designed to accommodate 662 units
which has now been reduced to a total of 516 units.
A'IAI YS IS; The project presently before the Commission is significantly
t dif erent from the first design. This design is the result of working
with representatives from Chaffey College and residents from the Deer
Creek community. There were several issues of particular concern in-
cluding overall density, phasing, drainage, circulation, and the relation-
ship to the college campus and Deer Creek community.
ITEM D
1v !
• Staff Report
Neeva - TT 11 -80
July 14, 1982
-2-
The density of the project has now been reduced to just under 8 units per
acre, which is within the General Plan maximum of 8 units per acre. In ad-
dition, the north boundary of the project along Wilson Avenue has been de-
voted to the development of single - family homes on minimum one -half acre
lots which will provide better neighborhood compatibility with the existing
Deer Creek homes.
The issue of phasing was of major concern to the residents of Deer Creek.
The first phases of the project will occur at the north end of the site and
access will be provided via 'Wilson Avenue. The residents were concerned
that the number of units built in the first phase, prior to the construction
of the Banyan loop, would cause traffic congestion along Wilson. The devel-
opment now indicates a maximum of 66 condominium units in the first phase
along with the 8 single - family homes. This is consistent with the discussion
the Commission had previously when reviewing the environmental impact report;
at which time it was indicated that the first phase should be in the range
of 60 -80 units. The next phase beyond the initial phase of the single- family
units and the first condominium units will take place at the southern end of
the project site and will take access off Banyan and Haven Avenues. In this
• manner, no additional traffic will be added to Wilson Avenue. In addition,
the model complex area will be built for the project at the north end. Again,
the residents were concerned that the traffic generated by the model complex
could affect the neighborhood. Therefore, a temporary 26 -foot paved access
road from the model complex will be installed southward to Banyan and out
to Haven. This will be used to route customer traffic to the model complex
area rather than Wilson Avenue. The Banyan extension and loop will be con-
structed on a phased basis as each phase is added to the project.
The project architect and developer have been working extensively with the
college to incorporate their concerns regarding open space and rural charac-
ter. The site plan has been developed in a manner that incorporates the open
spaces of the project with the open space and theme of the campus.
The revised project which is present before the Commission reflects changes
per findings of the environmental impact report. The list of recommended
conditions on the attached resolution are needed in order to mitigate po-
tential adverse impacts identified in the project EIR.
DESIGN REVIEW; The design of the units themselveswere also a point of
concern ha s,:i upon the original proposal. Originally, concern was expressed
regarding the scale and design of the buildings as it related to the exist-
ing residential character. The architect, Barmakian, Wolff, Lang Christopher,
responded with a redesigned unit more in keeping with the existing residen-
tial character and scale by reducing the height and a more conventional re-
sidential design. The Design Review Committee has reviewed this project and
Staff Report
Neeva - IT 11550 •
July 14, 1982 -3-
is recommending approval of the architectural design and site plan design
aspects. The single - family lots along Wilson Avenue do not have precise plans
shown for each single - family dwelling. Therefore, it has been recommended
that each dwelling be reviewed on an individual or collective basis prior
to issuance of building permits.
FACTS FOR FINDING: This project has been designed in accordance with the
General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Growth Management Ordinance and Subdivision
Ordinance of the City. In addition, the design has taken into consideration
the surrounding properties and their effects, and is being implemented in the
fashion that will not create adverse impacts to surrounding properties.
CORRESPONDENCE: This project has been advertised in the Daily Report news-
paper as a public hearing.as. well as notices being mailed to property owners
within 300 feet of the subject property. Over the last several months, the
developer has held meetings with property owners and representatives from
Chaffey College to review final concerns. At this time we have not received
correspondence which objects to the project.
RECOP114E:IDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all
input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Com-
mission can support the facts for finding and recommend the Conditions of
Approval, then adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate.
lesiectf 11, submitted,
R ck �om��
ty Planner
G:MV:jk
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A"
B"
.1Cl.
11011
E"
F
- Location Map
- Conceptual Landscape Plan
- Tract Map
- Conceptual Grading Plan
- Detailed Site Plan
- Natural Features Map
- Building Elevations & Floor Plans
Resolution with Conditions
_2I
•
•
*a'do911191 tTcmvm
Sb* kirn Units..... 6 bDW
Wo* Fbn* Uruls ... 508 tow
dy
Of Ceve�cpment
Canksgumn (it —czft
aftwood-C F!
r4Voposed Phases
O_ w:hupla.yu.b
Phases
1
2
2A
3
14 1 5161
Tow.h T"nha
Urd - A
, Ajs n ;a *r Lim FmE e
10
2
M
110 TO
4
Unit .
44
6
a
Unit - c
—
12T2
8
10 6
12! 1
�-D
—
a
10
12 8
10
101
--
Unit - E
E24
E2
12
Q
L72 72
72
T- kii I Trll--
Swiuie Fanny Resod e— 2 Unit & 4 Uri] 12 Umt-
Tow.h T"nha
w n
, Ajs n ;a *r Lim FmE e
5 M m
om
ow
CULv
nun heeo
"At' WE
OR,
/Ir
14 111 -5ra
r It
I I�m
=44-
T;
TENTATIVE
11550
10
LOT 9 lz C- 2.29
kr-5.26 NET I-- ,-,I
LO T
A-C- WS NET
4x- 925-NEr
A.C, 16.88 NET
liar 4aba 6lAmmakfi ih; -I 60
f vtll�-i
E
L)
rlb mnle
rzGa
C-C �t�Rlnl
ad g r
E
0
n
U
w�:
D*naeas
fiLl
MA
whtyLip
s fled
L� .1 :,•ice e r • __� ,_ �y7Ci' �+, US'G
lu �f 1n ~tl A l 'J(}rr- .�ti•_� 2--7 VJ Yw
MRu
marr ° C ^
I Yom, \. ^' �• {' /� /� �J
�.4
l/
'. IY /i-
S'�Q IIMC� I�Ys
VLF
•
L
..... . . . . . . . .
ON
TERRACE VIEW
UPPER C54SF. GROUND 900SF.
Fccr Plan...
1554 sq. ft.
PATIO
ij
71HHEEF-52
ENTRY VIEW
A
L ---1—
_ ..e
Pe
Al
TERRACE
VIEW
UPPER 730SF.
GROUND 814SF.
F -cr Ran-Urtit-B"
L 44
ot
PATIO
ti-p .
UPPER 704SF. GROUND 965SF.
Fccr Flm,---LrJ"z--C
160,9sn ft
UATA!
ENTRY VIEW
PATIO
LL-
TERRACE VIEW
PATIO
UPPER 844SF. GROUND 814SF.
Fccr FLIM-Urnk- D
15530 -Tm
sq.-a.
..,,Vzrfte �
UXIEMCM1,
T4C! M50
PR
•
•
•
•
LEVEL
4`'
I =--tl#ll
E—�Ereary
L---Living
ROM
N-----RSook
a2
ER- --Bedroom
hffl----MwtBr Bath
B-------Bath
Ft. cr R=ns
Unkm "Wommso E
12 -ammus U6113
1p, -IFT m
ISIS Ste•
a2
Ft. cr R=ns
Unkm "Wommso E
12 -ammus U6113
1p, -IFT m
TERRACE VIEW
Ur,it--E- -
Hutt iiew
ME M, I
"I =7
0
0
•
�j
9
It
Unit E
Ammmeir"m
a e-
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -68
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 11550
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract flap No. 11550, hereinafter ''lap..
submitted by Neeva Corporation, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing
the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of
San Bernardino, State of California, described as 65 acres of land located
on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east and adjacent to Chaffey College
and extending south to Banyan Street into 14 lots, regularly came before
the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on July 14, 1982;
and
14HEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map
subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning
Divisions reports; and,
NHER'cAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the
Ennincerinn and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other
evidence presented at the public hearing.
NOS1, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucarionca does resolve as follows: •
SECTION l: The Planning Commission makes the following findings
in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11550 and the flap thereof:
(a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable
interim and proposed general and specific plans;
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is
consistent with all applicable interim and proposed
general and specific plans;
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de-
velopment proposed;
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury
to humans and wildlife or their habitat;
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious
public health prob l erns;
(f) The desi;n of the tentative tract will not conflict
with any easement acquired by the public at large, now
of record, for access through or use of the property
within the proposed subdivision. •
Resolution ';o. 82 r
I 2
• (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts
on the environment and a Negative Declaration is
issued.
SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11550, a copy of which is
attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following
conditions and the attached Standard Conditions:
PLANNING DIVISION
Design review for each of the single - family lots is
required prior to issuance of building permits for
those lots.
2. A temporary access road and parking facilities shall
be installed as part of the model complex. The access
road shall be from Haven Avenue along the proposed
Banyan Street extension.
3. A dense landscaped buffer shall be provided between the
proposed single - family dwellings and the multiple- family
dwellings.
4. Trees, ground cover and irrigation shall be provided
along both sides of Banyan Street extension and loop.
• 5. The edge treatment along the west boundary of the site
shall be compatible with the Chaffey College planting.
0
6. This tract is contingent upon approval of Zone Change
No. 80 -11 by the City Council. The Zone Change must be
complete prior to recordation of the map.
7. This tentative map shall become null and void if not
approved and recorded within twenty -four (24) months
from the approval of this project, unless an extension
is granted by the Planning Commission.
8. All requirements and ordinances of the Foothill Fire
Protection District and the Cucamonga County Water
District shall be complied with.
9. Main directories at entrances of the project shall be
provided.
10. The single - family lots along Wilson shall be graded so
that the construction of dwellings will not obstruct
view of homes to the north.
O'i
Reso l .;ti on 'lo. 37. -63
Pane 3
ENGTNEERING DIVISION
11. Wilson Avenue shall be designed as a Secondary High,.-jay.
The developer shall construct 32' wide pavement with
the face of curb location at 49' from the section line
of Wilson Avenue.
12. Public utility and sidewalk easements shall be pro-
vided behind the right -of -way line on Wilson Avenue.
Exact width of easement shall be determined based on
sidewalk design and utility requirements.
13. Installation of a portion of masterplanned storm drains
on Wilson Avenue and on Banyan Street shall be required.
The cost of construction shall be credited against the
storm drain fees for the project and a stand and reim-
bursement agreement will he executed to cover the con-
tribution which exceeds the amount of the fees.
14. Catch Basins on Canistel Avenue at Wilson including
connection to the main line storm drain shall be con-
structed to intercept all storm runoff from the north.
.J
15. The proposed Banyan Street at Haven Avenue shall be
aligned with the existing street to the west. Required •
right -of -way for the connection to Haven Avenue shall
be dedicated to the City.
16. Approval from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for the
use of a portion of the right -of -way for street purposes
shall be required prior to recordation of the map.
17. Installation of traffic signals to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer shall be required at the intersection
of Banyan Street and Haven Avenue. The cost of installa-
tion shall be credited against the system development fee
for the project.
18. Off -site street improvements may be phased in the following
order:
a. Improvement of Wilson Avenue shall be completed with
the first phase development.
b. A minimum of 26 -foot wide asphalt pavement shall be
constructed on Banyan Street from Haven Avenue to
Wilson Avenue with the first phase. A temporary
connection to Haven Avenue along MWD right -of -way
may be provided with this phase.
C. All storm drain installation shall be completed with •
first phase.
�� x'
Resolution No. 82 -j+8
Page 4
• d. Full width street improvements for Banyan Street
including curb, gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk on
one side, street lights and traffic signal shall be
constructed with the second phase development from
its ultimate connection to Haven to the end of the
phase boundary.
e. Rest of Banyan Street improvements shall be com-
pleted along with the other phase developments
contiguous to the street.
19. No building permit for the project shall be issued until
the Army Corps of Engineers Deer Creek project is com-
pleted,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY, 1982.
PLA�INING WIMISSION OF YHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Jeff e in9,
• �r.TF
Secre
•
1, JACK LFM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucar.:onca, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regul,:rly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 14th day of July, 1982, by the following vote -to-
wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Hempel, Stout, Barker, McNiel, King
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
� f
ptplArf1b, Or cv s,jrr Flv[IOPREg1
SFNIOARD cono...DYS W
subject: Tract Prve*jT 11550
—Tentative - - - - - -No. 11550 - Neeva
AVpl hint; _NC Cva_ I <. ,n trash plck
t.-t,cn: vs Wilson fro. rvbll Yp iM ll !e fo• f -li ie,ai wilt with .II rr
E/0 Chdffey Col leg— c dew. 1( no tennar......3n -,,(I with 1
Thai, Ilnn[ chrcted are conditions e �_ t5. standard ratio rarer .... ina 11 d Ira SM1, a taco
•• ..ov,dt..
t Dns Of aPW011l Ple nner and auiidln be w"1 .... to and aPp.O,rd !Y tce CI[
null LlY1 Slldq mHAC1111 9, and NI prl Or to o[cuemb of :ne Iv Y
FOC.Di IIO :IS: C —1 `lvr, OIYISIOM FOR CNIPLIAbCE YIIN IDE ro[LVaW6 —� 16. end bu.Iding'i number ub Ind .n ever unlit
q [t .....
A. S qr Ory opw x IL a coot ke canner, I ud tell proof• full+. na Hon. De identified In a
_el ens nei den clur
Xon led rove vtrrl or eaorte [rCuri I7 dead Delft and lock, SeatI be IraUtlea
1. Site than De dove lured In a[cor font. wl th the cM1 vole In thi
tl.e Pbnrill Ofviticn one the condition[ r S oral 1t.
aPn(a.ee safe plans an file X tar react tr dr.ice5 a
2. ibged . on to ine] herein. x Such as wlndav III shall 11
.cravat Sl Fall l totsulmifled fo 9[neeDlem,;ng lINVislon 19. toll un iLS wltnin .... ..... mS411H
bra lJ ni <p q:pre ling an Canal [Ices of jar Mter Fertln ep•e b
9 pu mR[' Prior t° issuance OF 9 unit. `€ pgj�,_ d to De adnp tee for .
x J• 4rr•OVaI O! lF;s reg "+fl stall 20. En< 9cn Ca fed rint9 Dvll On ^91e C1 to In -I" a :el br; rs e or, ]un reg Dr ei nanrP ne all pine: valve C nl Hn(e r; In +Il sec u0ns or redutm .,el I tel: •rr b M
t is, 0! R1{Iding Permi[ iSSUence. IPPI'lable CI [r Ord dunces in off wlndo,, eelendedoovaIM nr u :n OFr n^g as rtrt
P[f at Feeds. F•[I•= ^.d!r f r ;, Iat mn,n4. bi loon ID
1, IDe EevelIpIr hall %,• 11• Di lgtlrss [.l to r<et, ere ed
Petrea [ton Yehie le .toes le all lots with ad to sideya rd area for _ 21. lis orvel olx:eV^ shell
9 pursuant to CRY ftledards. -I ter nearing it- Provide an eptY Cn t0 tm.re buyers M
5. Irate --1, arle .tree ar.all be enclused It X Cu•CNSe t solar (�
via, ebst•.Ctln s Y a 6 foot Digb ma 30.Y y „all with 12. (.C' n[Y to
.....S Shall De ;. `
subject g gofer cursvent m City Standards, rotation dull be (atfloe °( the Foothill Fire P",Cetipn,OlrS District. i -
`0 aVprovJl DY
be Plano in 'hit Tract t0 the Sa[IS-
x S Dlvl non. X 11. Local
6. A smear orande ran/ ma for Lrl sQwll D I. cyst[. play(] r
jar r rlen d door oval P to 4nl l (r,l to Ll.r pinnn,,.g bin lslon [rat( in a:[[r.. -,,, ;.'u ....... Ir+,l, ,1..,11 r V-
x • n. t utv+nce or bulldin "I" .let mV'igt mg .f i��• `c- It".,. ne�l r4•' p�nv "art i�f•t�,r
1. All rn.•f aniwrtrv<ra, 9 Permits. nd xe••• cot ro 1, , �•• ,r'" ' r"
.L S. ..1 r vl.. t e
In frgr al rdr
Shield nd Ir °nnvl ew and alb COndlt,°neri, Fe ivl ci tl<0 andn aan•O.ir Ce +.qh , rt% epvrtL y" ^ I... ,t
and Streets 15 D Sound our[ rrrnl�omDa J arch. 6111111111 r lordafl°n o1 `pp,..Id I, SFr C-" Planne• ('a,l ... +r de^ dealt
re9u trod by the PI.nning and Oullding Di vis long a<ent pro per[. et lM1e Ifnal .1D, poor toe ..oval
X a. Pricy to _. 24, ibis trod .nett form or a c ]
trier ran, `52 DII ter n,,rct sl to or by SIn.,, aCf.v ltY being (Yr,w erre ryvettr tan tra; IS. annex to a e ..tenant. district rpr
the Satisfaction e III,,, of I'Pmval Contained Imrr:n null be -Co-op ;--led tp a maintenn
° the Ol rector or Co,mYix " OIrsid n,,,t) 5[rrrl n hell ce e(
9. Ibis to final e.01led 51eel rOaming Policy,
11Prpvel ihdMl bef°nr null an' sold If pull [.4e Ilnal map. " tr Cin" " ^1
for u;s Pmlect with"' one year trow the e+ee of ing cleats arc s y, P —c, Io rp.°.e1 n .0 r° Since
Pre,, net' III." nJ r
_ lo. 411 C- C"n "a1 a torn vat 26. it un, er,n onto[ m[n,es fe ceLC of
rl y,( "rn (10) ea..i ns Lnn'o�h DI jr °ject sMll Lttune hall u.l vn.0 m vn tceCbic lut'- to n. odhr Aft hen rn [.•rl :.es an rr am -il • n Ile ule approvrd I4 Can0 [fed. PDrpva 1, Vn ISt permits are ISlY1a or final be lrgP re v,<•,ed D/ th. O(Y'plJry rr i o1 tr.......A,nns
11. n n ^e nl.I Lonlrng
plan ,at, - p''or to e,u n1 or
e !r Sv M.le r•1 io cost a
Iryl[.•III.,... rJ �u [r If
n.tFOd °I(S 1.1 t1 ,n^
Syll N,er ota unn, Flu p�(gI'd 11h • rlr Sln It .rm la tr . f ro. r •, t•. —_. rj.•:••,; rr e n ae!• r
to 1Y a(Itct "It
0j nl diuy 4 1 •r is rylv.o t^i r" -clot _ :rg:
D•cper tic 5. o hghting Ir,e• :� ve G•- ;n •. tr: ,: •^; n.' v . r
,� nr I— Of (Ynr C, r...nt rn l': taL t. rr n�j , 'f, ....: ,'nr•5•,il
11. .tn 5 n u -g peals.:ntta""i et the two of .
nitisl u vrlormt s1. +11 pri r rL�L ^]`� t•
g br D. r,•i ln7 t r. n,l hr __ rrta t'^ .r a �. .t
e1.. rr T•r.yt I..e J ^.e
I0n11 [C n.a In[ I+n:wrtf ql+ ^b -r.al r
e<rt]1 Yse s, IOV`�ent 60 (Onnl d.11 ling3 wilM1 SOnrn 53pJ Ct s ^and viJCO 0! 5' are shill C mta.n 1 •, a •^,
n Ill-wau .]ycrn trm r,. t,,.p rtJilC e,+a'nuon
2,
Farling tot trm+ to
+n !r a nm,r„m 15 6+Ilo
^ S,:r
J. 0 t -a .a' -1111 .1-1161 still be a .nlnrm.m pe 26 feet .111. •
_Y a al a`111 11.111 Ir 'I' rnlenJ,fC f...
'It . .,II i1 ... ..... ru[tiar, In a + rlt41l.,v 11..11
f,.. 1 .. ...L.. I..._1
5. oll "Ill., 111:,,1 11.111 tv d,.Lle Irby J.
_x 6. All a "ll 'hill ere pr a. r.IrJ +.':4 avt_utic q ". dvpr os'n.er 1.
..... .pall Le turf lied Id.
9Jll .eat n[t t'.1 sto n9e of r [re's'nIal
+ Imv "to unl v+t i" ale ..a Principle i.n¢ of trin.or to tivn
Ier t e . -•. r.
ny ,, rll fe f" .,I II ^d u'tivn Ine in t,, for It,,. I., I nn als 1, nl oe.. r
n Je..;•l: •1 I (.• It II. J Ca'. 1n I I. Co.: and 11.11. [l root thin
•4-J I{
Z. :. :/ ':c 1 I:1n� and 4 r:leJ to, Ine City Pla,.r n.l
F'•' ,_n , v -10 i.v. ..., of ov,lInrg
C. 1.n ......
r,
x I. A Jefa.IN leuncave and irrigation plan shall to tnNnittrd to and approved
If t4- pin, 1-'d 01.1110" Pnar m the b'mnce of buildup per its.
2. ping
`11 it rll L^ relalnod arcrerer possible. .l older plan of
lr.err .1 "o lacalron, sill and t"n 'h..11 l•,
11.1: I4- tprl L, e' ::d plan snail take Into a ... 4- t 1-.v ...paved
o " aa.ncJ, Irn era 4-n loons, I'll w1c. r
t. 11 -ill is ll 111:11 nw 10 Iry IIVIIJ, 4-,a or n Il.,J trees. ire plan 1 .eqm red
.n.1 a 11.1 1 .4-J by env` Pbr_vng Divitioa prior to avv. oral
:. a c4,rpra
x 1 Slat bens, u I, 1 .1 15 gallon s le Or Janitor, }hull r, am tJI 1CU in
..4-.l lnl •
in I'''r!'IS " 111-1 of S',III trees for It., Cl I, of Ny«I.a
C.. .-:• ,; n s: 111 11 1),1•,1 11 1n .! a/ of ! cry )U• on rot,..on
I t. fILI J :•J :J' it "!1, 1 1t.e.`I1. a
x a. 1 r1n+.,,. of SD trees rep gross ac". cor.prilld of the f.11c.ing SIII'.
mil le .4-m 1-'J .I tl.,n Ila e_4- n son ,ehq 201-14- bea or I .gar. J01 -15
nillvl, a J IL:.S g,l fan.
x_ 3 611 Imd:CJ.Il arras Hall Le hainta mad In a healthy and thriving fon-
all .n, Le+ I. I ,..._edv• Ira ih, and Jar is.
6. :.11 iGre hin.v . .,less UI five (5) feet In vertical height and of 5:1 or
c .D+ slot" 11.111 ce Ia•.drte ^eel 1.0 irrigned I. orJ.mce e."' tl ape
,;a" I, . .L ; of 11,, L;y of P,.,!,. .1- O L , 1 . 5neh ,loco 9 In¢rug
.'sit 1 It tot In to II IN to .m t I J 9•c.nd I o Ipp II
nd ,. w•r. I
•.Is ,' 1 t...Ch. .:II 1. 111111-.1 I'd I ng.bn th.11 Lr nn l.nneu,l
'JI I4-, a`1 111111"'; [ J.I..n by 1'1e d ,4-1 nl ". until c,yh
.11
1 1 tall 1m1 c - - s U
c Dy .e bite. P,... to I el el v..g
1 .rl-1 1m Into units. rC Linn of the %lope, spill ere cc pl rd
la Ine 11'n ,...•a Slnl 11. nZ Il. h, th.c it i, In ,1I.,IJImry IcnJlt ion.
x ), nil 1•,,I x:11, n nl I:'...Sl Jning ,hall II, fill, r l.arnd Cr a
11. , c _In, Jf!e PiJble to I,,, City. 5rn:ll I.renf
or n ....e 4h1Il too ILI— tied fa alt (I ty Prior 10 I,tu.lnCe of In I IJm)
_111. The II1.1 Yid ".On, at ao. and In approorialc Irr Jolt ion sr, arm. tha 11 be
In, i J n.1 LJ 1-.e Je.nlnpr1 in Icco In II, .I Ih rue >i sled nl an,.
at it.. 11550
9. the final devlgn of the .......I, pvr l..i YS, malls, land'tap.n^ Ind lid, r,rll; InJll 4C Included In I'.; r...„rrJ I...... ca Ve ",-I Jna t alt Le
4 „Ll pct :v an ➢ro,al or V'e P;l mhj D1,1,,-
1, n,nrn.nn, of 1 of the beet p4nted atuln the 110ltct, shall be
I 51 cc l al Ian llceV^ fe stun es such ♦ n i1I In 1, alluvial rocY. s,.•ci en site
very. n -an a4- ory sell -O" (.atnl, tin, l end hor,,ln1a1 Chan3C) "Ill
l.ten vlr eJ •l ndsc ap mg, it re, ,d aloof _
D. Sig
_$'1. Any Hopi Proposed for UIS d4- I.,,ent mall "ani•lnnd i
r, (b the co- n c
;4-c cn 111! Sign Drdln nae and s oll rCO.;r r< re•I naN app. oral
Lr Ice vl annu.;JDIl l s ion .prop to fns 1-11,111cn Of roan
1. h un1 /n rrn t,nn .moon for ILLS go`110111nt 11'111 be wM11I LL'J 'n 11,
Pl vnmy olvay.on for their review and approval prior to (swance of
Ib .Id.ng
1. We signs Inds!.tad on. the t0bnitted plan\ are hot a,1rov 1 with raft
approval and will require lcllrate sign .cried and apl'•ovei.
E_ frddltinnal AJ,pnvgl' P..rtred
he'll" shall be acc.rillithed prior to the Itioance Of a pvlid.ng
penoit.
t,
DI "Ithrent Review tNJ be acepmyl lthed prior to record,, on if the final
In ivi lion, map.
_ 3. Aillhi al of Tentative Trvct Ito. _ {s granted Is1,111 to the approval,
a. this CUnnl banal Ute Permlt ft granted for a .,nerd of onthfl) 11
wh1lh lice the Planning Con,nlv.os may add or delete fonmnans or revg4
the Conditional Use Perms t.
S. The deralo.ef I' required to ob0aln the fill le,.in7 slgne•I sWb *.1-t or
pur.:vtt i 4-'S 0( Lo-n ei which have a 01111Se or PobiK equestrian hail on or
adjacent to their property.
In ptlfhaling bre Ilene located on lot _ Tract
1 (rave revel Ine C.f. S P find
un Jns WnJ ,Let teTd LO[ is Subjoa to a ewt.nl too pmcal
ent ov the wrnote arllo.Ing ewei Irian refill .
9a in acids.
51,ned
PVrfha Ser
Slid Statement is to be riled by Lire developer with the City prior to
Occnluncy.
X_ 6. P. in, to approval and r .- On of the final me, or pop. to I nc! or
6" in" Pe...rlt. ripen no 51110 iwislnn r: 1p IS in+nl... .r It,,,, f,.,,r If Sl i nn
fin, J11 IfIlG teJ SCnool ohµn¢1. the tl be wi.,s a•l to Ine n..pu I+'ent of
(......n ilr nrvelcvr..Ut wmN s1- trt oat ale... I tI s col flplstir. a
.Ill ere en...... to l n,la ling st •I.•n alf.l rhy In .11 ". t. reS.ch
1e 11I' I( e4- llfr c l t. to
, 1,ty M11 4 , oI nor Lo IJ.e f0.al f t,..
Jnsran quo I4- I'suanee of n'`•1' ahe•v1,0 4-n Ilse f.ne of Ild htil
Vru L'. Permi [s 4-n the Cute nl all of h.4- pet lJMlvl
1 "f
1
to eAn•r ..a one nrJl,p
�Ify n.ling '•a• nru ,.er' n n,p it rn lbire,r,a "el'. r plot'„ nor 4z sNnu
.it]rprl wnillL iris: r rt'[ skit ,d"lu. hol tort" pnJ halt ter `[ih•lrnn 1, nn: be
a• a to trrre u,e pr ,yin yea ' bet .ur or
t•. rJr o-..,.l m 1.., ,n,,,,lr nl .. rl r........ Sinn irun zfiatl 4,r sr,l: n, u,..l l0 :ee
the [etn, •I r:lr ,[I ,•, IU Y5 I,r iur ,I Ir,vn I, r,.1 iz -.,r.
of steno Y;6e1 J.r ;n t,,,al ,.a^i .I, h�nv.J
'I rJfnl,el In nl r(!I. (er I is It 1tf :r tl•e rate ! till „'i r
1'r ore 5aela ' gn:n,ll 6dl a Jects a r,g ;rxll[ ln,y faali tees al Spun Stir
r,ua f` d arra tlr
'rc IIF'n uon of a Crrrl,pl nm. r Ott^ .rr 11,.0
Ar b1 ncJ nut ranap,IilY. in[lu,ling II sunlror.s r, lomuti ,,, p,a 11
„J.a, uerl to ure Uty.
e- Lon aw +ovJ) {L tit hrr null
Is nnl .Apr nvel „ - rr JnJ rV ltl Ir [hr trn lJ lilt 4,L,lin s-on
lm nlrcrl. ,rllnm l,a.a n,an
(11) ^,r Le a Jing rrr mrb rxmJ vhf, rrn n,Ir rS
unleii an e, t ni la rl IrJS [e err 'err l l:s I1ry' Ilre an l,r oval of E1. I••c ll'[t
�ranLm br u¢ Pl inn lny Go,,,silo.
11115 Slr ltd I lt... r.Ji nV[ SVtrT l lied a4 a e,0 t1I 6e,eloryirnl N[4a,r er:J r
rIo rr.l ,, ,c.,l,l,l] (or a ADnr[ tJ tong rfl.,trvr IO clod dC {(gn SrCIIVn of
ertrnoln 1'Jn,,g....0 Ord,nin[e Cpl or to Simi a;ryroral arm r'elerd, ti on e!
me nuR If 11,! subdiv,sinn is 90 rng to be developed as tr+ct Hones.
AITLITION Sx!•lI fONIA(i 111E BUfl01CL 01VISIOx FOR COMPLIANCE V17M ICE rOLtb.'IIr6
"rrLl
CONDITIONS:
r. Tr to CnNrpent
x 1. Ibe arVhomt 56011 <nrnply with U., latest oeorted Unilo m !Iytldin, CnJe,
Uni Iron I;rc lr n,i<al CCLe. Uni ln.nr Pl off Log Code, national [Is,, tic Code, end
an ct+f, arrlkable coati and ordinance: In effect +t tiro tine of issn+nce
Df relative Permits.
i. 1'r let to iic'rar -r of I.y, lrl ing rennin for [ombo{t,hle [nnSlrVCti.n. PvlJenre
Iron 1• snluinro In tlro IoCthlll Ui{trict lire art,r ti,,t te,ramrary ,w ter
iil<Jy Im fire Fill p[m rn , or revu,rfd
Crobrt,I. .... . 's u011ab1e 9 olio' le UOr
X !. 1•r for le t,,, It"'i;[e or
„nrtfe) or It' ' r t Ena to ,^ding nem,it for nru resldnrtiel duelling
I'1 mot f du, r tit l ng vn q(s 1. the a :,ircant shall Hey
d'•' [ft at (M1e ez ti Ll nbeJ ra 0i,. Sycn Irez it” in"no", bol not
De I,nrlrn m: .... CwyLl"'Itien tee, Par. Fell. Unrenr far, SYZ lens
0.•. elcr Hen[ red, Perot[ mW Plan [hocking lees, and School fees.
P, no, to the Issue n[e vl a bniiomg perm.[ for a n nnu'tri al
"I-PI"V 'In I or IJJi an a develu rmr[of, r e,r jot oa rl [taint r.l ]I)
^Rlr,•mnl lea, ,t Lth,l nULl, ilmdi�9ti,. Such l 1 r 1'dY
cnektlro —10
rert- Sys cent Cevelop0 tit fee, Critelli, fee. Film', and Plan lnol
x S. $t rrr. aJJrrses shall be lrarided by the bmldrog Dlr,r ii, 1.
_B. P.el lrrp ynl^ S a,nitrvcl,d 1
Y v. mWd••
too, "ot a th fire .rbrd.at ra lrntl you r.on-
_1y
I" rn„, r[' m e. • :,Ill loll. 11., nd, ng elra t,cn r0u N rn „I w lol trim ,n,D i Jr.J z,J trt
to ^r
on$ I'In f r
I,IJ,rI-
I_ru�
1, Il,, Or co-.;q ra Dyne Co.if for r,i, I,nr
,00h wrif, y[r. [a, ra ,,,a err -, e: is lJ Veers{ it '.,Ann 'r
I. ,:t rng,., i, tl,'I I.nm]ale to 11 ,.. '
lfn.nq .fg,rl :,n" or [.r ,nrm ..J rr.e or u, p. n. 1-pi
for.., t-u.
' rP,e LnrlJ m II In ,�•CI, V.eA.
' t0 [VIIY wr In r(6C :11',1 it cl li, null Ln rb o.r.l M1
. 11,
L•nifara PILL b ln g fodf, a»1 Wt(orw tylln,ug Coin.
<a rp. 11550
u. crna my
X 1. e. aeinq ar Lxe sylr)ea oloorriy S... 11 Lr In a ..,In n:r I "IrYnr
C rill rn'r (UJq C,{Y fnrli r +w'1• r
luul ggdr9g.a fen Sry14 L uDt {,n {yld[on lor.�e +[elf (n InC[r00rp vrdnr
son[ep lual " g olio.
x 2. A Soils .Cron sMll le Drfoa..I Dy • roel:flld eng,nter IICeolld by the
...Le or C, I l Fort, ID Gerfo[a Su? n.L.
Y
and so Uhl L L n di al Ctl.0 L t•ee C( Dr era rfJ l:/ d goalrl,n1 e,)In( -r CI gfplp al
app"cat,on for groding Alen rr:a. 9i
K C. ll.r'tnnal grdJ ing Dlan I-.
c," g'o mi Role enJ shell -,.rIC VJ D�rrr t0. ar ]Il v.n oe tie Ilnal
Sv LJ ills lye r.]D of Is :until, 01
5. As a cv51. -ILI SVbd 1V IS LOn, lire 19110 v:ng r[']' /rr "ref{ 1ne 114Lf ,re [:
a. 5ure(y 'fall b- II and an r.rly r.
of oll cn -z ite Jraine9e faplrt r <s n tn:er/ lo.- g,'r` °1 rr r.e cryll(,.
(0 the Sdtj,,Cei Cn of (n, Bv,:e,ng e f Se letY C: r:{rnnring II Dar[elt-
b. I -I, -ir :d ("to P sots, i,e'r s r E, S:`,I, or dr a•ti x-...111, t ^n[ are
loo -rdt,d 11.11 m• J 1 1, re ls, rr'I I
riled IC Ure sa ll zfeCLi CO of tie Pu, ld in are lel,ne tarp ' "a
III e44 OUk inn.
e. lb. -s i[f d.d mafe ,.....[ -a t;. r (T.
t"I sued nlUed frr, Prc rp a rt afy air f. , D• p •Ir••IOg J
inil d log Arrnitt for z• ere :oche •, nitallil 'l L Il.,I r -el `1
tC, Or cal'tt rtn5 Lo,Cdra .r I :n >t -,r Ce s +ll let V
De rr 11 Ilia [, V< t0 r.f rLlr 1 burl E, ng (Prm,t li ng Oe vilhln a
d. noasdiee.�o v van for
l• " [a'ca are m b• ;y ..o y.e tD u•r anti dory
(Chic n[ c „:.:.a` o`:11 to : r pvrid in
mny be on +n , rrn !gal r • -00t,n Senn 1 R Oe.,el lt.
,. [I SIC!, bank, in decd{: er Irvp (5) l.11 r rr[nal n e•J CI
..:I ar greeter tic A, snall 1' a• ..qn „•b.r - r r +r uon
of gaa Jinj or ar•
'hill LCC IP'I in laP tirt+f f.rc [, Ur C r ,rrl Jrr ^I ;Coal ,,r rlrlf rll
6 non ifs trier Der vnJ [, en "etr J.^ t;" n,.0 firma', n.o -tn to Vt,Oa
point
AfTf ICA:II SM(L CONTACT 111E foCICC Y,-
CnnOiTIO'IS: +C UI :151 r'I !Cd CC'sll +d CE 91111 ➢[C f011Wlnt
Ur Jloatr0rr5 ,,o ""I ,,, IT
Y` 1.
If ,ca
,sinos .rol) I-, ry r Je !.' 11 —Z , of all
-�11 nJ ell .r.�a.'
_�'_ t. nnbld,ion shell De none cr [fe spill. rng , _ r.,y t1, , the folio. mg
13an'r'an ,,en”
_7Z = —zxxz x;41 [tn r _WII son _-krenue - {50' half
_ umtro "dl _ _
_XI Cn, rrr r, fry I,nf ,old __________.__Width)
1 rrr Ell, fn,.l,.na-
__ a. All r r.r a or- .ry - -cv Lo- ml.b =t, o.ni C .... Ern ....I
as foe J.n: r
vn114a
Siff n JA or "I:' bl- lloo.11d [ flu rrn 11,nr[n Ir. nar.f d , � rr•. eli
n,ll [r n 11[el sit
f. Ae.'n.'Ilr Pror i {Inns IN 11 he Add. far lot Ing.e........ le lrrNl
cirrvla I" of any 11.,IS Wdtl and
l rill be died for del "n'Y or 9.Wt is
the Prq "'rCY ter in the o",alion of the Probated M {loco,
1. rriw to dr' +INg. e+te"rrtf for <reN•lel o"fw ge sMll M "mired
and uu❑ k delineated or nnlihd 0. it, (INI N0,
6. All ea fl hang easNln is ly i.lg witpin PoWn'e rlgbl.eL.q ere to be
yy "ittlaln.,•d or to be delineated N the ND Dtr CI [Y Er.g inner I. beM l(la n1-.
y f. (n+rxeq for ,IJe,, o !pr public ient tAa 11 b! dedlulN l0 the (its
Nitre fidew lit Hander Uroupb DrloM D"VN'lY.
J. Sire« I , .ern is
1. fn.. a n. .1 pill tt r.•el Iryr. DYI':untt lacludln9. wt eat 'waited to
tree, aandgIt"' light, eon all 1, idel0rt[lrrive aDVroaeMa. Nr[wy
A ain4.n. Of "'(eat wide Pl vcarnt ...... A ao -foal wlJe "'felted
r i9Lt- of -w +J Null be IIIIW -cted for all hall - section tire, lf.
]. Can, t wet if.. fallowing 111 Sing I.pro,,Ae,t, Meted l no. but net
United lo:
SIRE It If:J1 ..C. 1 - TIV.IY GLF .0 •.YIITf.!1
E fAII t(B DY:IL 4r1LK APPR. 1140IS 0IiLAY ISLNIp While
wits on x x x x x x - --
Ban an x_ x x x x
•Inc lud6 land4 aD log end Irrf... inn en Bete,.
+- P, 11 to any ..... t'a"I Plrfora d In the Vu>I It Ight- of -way. fees
wlJ and an entroach.:ent Dernll grill be gotaimd free tM
CI [Y
r9 net' 0l /Pte, in odditlon to any owner Dernits f"011ed.
5. Str,nl la;•rovencnl Diane approved by
P ithe City fn9inler and pre Dl "d
In a lgit tr: rd Civil [ngineer {ball be "gut ltd, for all tile.[
Vr u.Nn...lt, Dri ar m htvance of an entree anent p,_,t. renal
plans and Nefnt, Sbe,, She, ll.c lec.11ol Of .11 tAl"holl utility
facilities within the rlglit.af -way.
S"I'Ll "alt be Poll -" N•d as a9reew,ht tKeCuted to the u[I Peat lion
el U., Cif, (,droner and o, city Attorney. 9a+rbrttelnq cO.m le lean
0! lFn Nrpl It ir•I.•crrn rn l;. A,," b "tOlJing 01 (b! ND Or ll.e
fiwae« of IllJmq rerarlf, .h,C,.,a,, t<nef fvtt.
X I. Ail ttrrel I•P. pv „renb ,nail he Inttailed 10 the utbbtt(an of the
f,ty [ntln.•rr, I'll, to OC[up,v”.
x t. P =n "•ul tlrreinl, err Sing, bal "' and N• «t n C tipl.q fNII be
pit ante Par t reg0.r.rnb or 1De I .,
- C ly [nq in,er.
A Eutling city rcre rlmdrin9 rncenN"nien ear
to Tt tl all u. q "t" "I""" d.•leurl "Urmq I— uC liw.. A
t +3n dry n;q 31 +11 ue rrV nna to leer tl,e teat er one
la.rr•q..r.gb shell 4e r Iu.2eJ c hae'l lPn or the cant lrU(lrun la
ibe [+li{4[llan 0/ l4 (ItY Lng ..ter.
Project fie, 11550
x Io. Yalbb, [M II M rodde Located. ...... m ppl it SW. 0" IM do -t Pte
X 11. C"trntrateO drainage (I", yNI, opt pots flN +alts. Under IJr.
.aL
deal,, 'hall be I.,t.Ilhd to till t4ud+rd;.
li• M
to the energl dI,,Ip,t,, Indla, lrntrpn COnIr01 ,«tore, s,rll p. Int l +llel
A Itllerapl t. .. eflance of d,.1Nye earn ale 'It rc.r eernj Ul Sl.b 51-111,.
O.rrerl iMll be verifying. pit l t dnrmt[reln pr pp[rty
RnrnJ d non, ememl
x_ 1.
Me +ppI lent wilt 6r ...Nov. pie ear m'1 FVC [l en oI ♦Il en -site
d "(.y91 raell"1es r "uir, by lM City E 't"
p. Inte"SKtle! &&'AS .111 M "galled at the fol ln.inq teelU My; -
j. Ibt pmDpsed prej<[L (Ills wi14m acct ("J't]led .rt
flaOdi ng unMr the Nil ... I Fl tied Insw an<t rp S °b nt to
the Dr.vinnI or shit Drpgran .M City Ord,rf,. pT "N l[ ,object td
.A drainage channel Ind /., rlpod prettcl. on wll vat tr ..LVCd I.
prole« the IlrvcNret by of...flag ,.It en in [neeU. or Co t
Store drIfn.
5. AdaC.0 le prov It Inns their b! etd. for ecop4+ae f1
wrlKe dra I.... on..... the r,0,,EY IrM a•.e dgrr ") or
adACent d.CrS `s
6, Letter of ACCeptance ff,n dannitrean
where rum(( fron the trot, floss on to rVi.ly r.nert fnell M required
y. p[rrate
p e,� trail
Slr¢!IS ff VUrrrn3 a CML,n She,, Of O[Srgrrd ai r�j nr .a .rye. if
tire df ire lVPr..ehv, ra11<d st.«v crv,nl m•D .r ter .+
.m /er bode..,' earth bans and row "JiOriiew tr a[ettwn
I lee. , n.00crty
-� a. the following afore drain {hilt be ins Pre eery gctlon of
be City Engineer; a lied 1p
X9. rr far in recp,de - --- ---- --
Study for the l r•+0, a t.r]d.t GaM M1(:.01 f.1,c nnJ d"IN 9e
review. VroA<ct 3M 11 pe mhaft"0 to tee bey Lng weer fee
1-1 fl [tin
X I. nr.e all vii li l).
L1r. rlecv re Yw.e..
"r.ica IP lath 1t[ ear 1,.d,.g
.rtr . Nt. «1tN11n1 ].,e u:.11 I,•i..rn<n en...fv lt.
R i. nn utnun,t.al.0 ue n":rtt ✓411c rot ull,a .... P.. nou,d
In;lwJlnq ,.,It
f along wj+r ar«nl" Iris uvn 11 rr-
st"i.`y utility[( sF111 Ot VrN,O,j to t,e r;]trOn 0! [n[
g utility rMl.Jn its in0 ter (.lr Enernn e..
x t• @relrr.•r 111❑ be .d1.h fble Ear t"r '01110.., nl t „su„
tilibes. ha rt9-n . 0. 9 puDl It
X S. t•a.1101 ^'. Slyll be ItN'OntiOlr IOr
at[prN nee i [
[,c v'tl .l ,a p rn n Sl•cet Ilgl.l Peet
rn wI, $pvtAtrn (Ill enua EL [:n fn - :ny ra n.l r
lr.. - � –� lr[xl iW f: r Clinf [Mill IK Jet iyly0 rnO [loll rVfllJ ID Jrl1 /`
r .,.It nr ur r.r > -c n.r> a,uny ..rrr er.v if I[.L ). Innluul
•.ulr din
cr " ' -r'^ is lm or my11J Gp yr °t•rII
V rr 1. v rrJ rr•, r.l.t r: n. n(e Ir[.1r I(::1'r lx a• rfJ
rtt w:ul u.l: tex hu Ju[I hllft JnJ or 4:r mh.r.... [rJ
r .J! !r rID .I11 Le fuileat la irq
rpr•r .nO :.r. »le r4.>.<] 6ct Uri.
x_l. rn nb rra, oUrr'+,. alet .ill LC rwµ beJn rol los:
-
.
pp C. Sn. L.. [ {loaf
mto-ra
x 2. A cosy ur the (a.nunat. [midi [ions duo !¢S V icl ions (L. r. 6 R.'s)
uIJ ^i 141M
It of tni ibx.tanxs Assoc n[i on, suoJ.<!
lO tl. >I irp.Jl Jr ['e Cltf :'[[p rn eY. f:rd l Lt recprdId r,tcl> ......ap
JiJ d . a Dr J•,kJ :o U: City.
X 1. fr /JI L]., xl JoJ tract n.J s shall tlnrprw to City stdnddrds 'I'd
d. 4 1 uca4 r.Jp [411 6e ref creed prior 1! Iirsl pMSd
pdrtrlr. ID Wlrl slon to
y wf.r.l ce]ricn JI ur,ca lu keJ
r.... to r LU, JJt iun,'J /lul i[P or In lln llDn to I!T end /!f SIIn
Ir LJ .l!„ l:=.h i e . eel J . pp(r r q +UCry .p..yJ tr,xiJ R Lil flied den 1,.,, cit.. Corncrl.
to ort tr tf[ /orxO(itJ1 sla tl Lt Ll me
x ! la'JtC>I•Cava rnlw!t[dV ^J pJft"'I df1 "SulrW to Lr dnlldald Ut. th!
f do ]rK2 It St rl Lt.
.�� .x ). IJr.!,l Jp lug aW rrri9IIron tfsllM rlluif[0 to M IYttdllod on ouhll(
`— rl J!t nor f]p [nr tLn peri;., [r. li Inis Irvcl d u fM 11 ou tlnr Llnom ly
ir.lu Ire LrWS -aary laf er uuUl KLV•DIeJ lr rl4o Citl JnJ dnnueJ
rlru [euJU:e dii tr rf 1.
^ilex, id, 11551
• 10 •
i-1�
•
RESOLUTION NO. 'Z" - - �t1�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11550 AND ZONE
CHANGE NO. 80 -I1
WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1980, the Planning
Commission determined the need for a Focused Environmental Impact Report
for the above - referenced project; and
WHEREAS, such Focused Environmental Impact Report has been
prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act guide-
lines; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended certification
of the final environmental impact report; and
WHEREAS, on the '4th day of August, 1982, the City Council held
a duly advertised public hearing for consideration of certification.
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED:
SECTION 1: Findings: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council does
• hereby make the following findings:
1. That the Focused Environmental Impact Report, adequately
addresses all areas of reasonable environmental concern.
•
2. That the significant adverse impacts identified in the
Environmental Impact Report will be adequately mitigated
through the application of mitigation measures recommended
for inclusion in the final Environmental impact Report.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
aurpn M. Wasserman, City Clerk
� n
Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor
• ORDINANCE NO. IG 1'
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
201 - 191 -07 FROM A -1 -5 TO R -1- 20,000 AND R -3 FOR APPROXI-
MATELY 65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 41ILSON
ADJACENT TO THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF CHAFFEY COLLEGE AND EX-
TENDING SOUTH TO BANYAN
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
• B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby
rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning man is hereby amended
accordingly.
Assessors Parcel Number 201- 191 -07 of approximately 65
acres, to be rezoned from .A -1 -5 (Limited Agriculture)
to R- 1- 20,000 (Single Family minimum 20,000 square foot
lots) and R -3 (Multiple Family Residential).
SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall cause the sane to be published within fifteen (15) days
after its passage at least once in The OailY Reoortt, a nee:spauer of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1982.
AYES:
is NOES:
ABSENT:
0
171
0
nTmv AV U n MOB A nT TO n nnnTrn n
STAFF REPORT �n4lr 'Vol.
oI
DATE: August 4, 1932 U,
TO: City Council and City Manager 1977
FROfl: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Annual Engineer's Report
Attached is the Engineer's Report and Resolution for setting the rate of
Assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. Based on current historic
charge rates, this years maintenance costs have been reduced to $0.20 per
square foot which has reduced the annual assessment from $63.04 per lot to
$45.00 per lot. During the 1981 -82 year a $13,259.66 carryover was recorded.
This money has been designated to restoration of the Base Line parkway in the
vicinity of Ramona Avenue and Teak Way.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council approve the attached Resolution setting the
1982 -83 Landscape Assessment at $45.00 per lot.
Respectfully sub fitted,,
LBH:bc
Attachments
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1982 -83 ENGINEER'S REPORT
. FOP.
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article
(,,Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
SECTION 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The report deals with the actual costs for Fiscal Year 1981 -82 and the
estimated assessments for Fiscal Year 1982 -83 of Landscape Maintenance District
No. 1 for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Areas to
be included in the work program are specifically defined in the body of the report
and on the attached Assessment Diagrams. The total area of said parkways being
199,936 square feet (area amended per actual field measurement). Work to be pro-
vided for, with the assessments established by the District are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinanry
and usual maintenance, operating, servicing and restoration
of any parkway improvement. Improvement maintenance is con-
sidered of general benefit to all areas in the District and
cost shall be divided on a per lot basis.
• SECTION 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Parkway improvements were constrcted by the developers for the individual
suudivision parkways. The plans and parkways are as stipulated in the conditions
of anproval for each subdivision ans as approved by the City Planning Division.
Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps and the assessment diagram for the
exact location of the landscape areas. The plans and specifications for landscape
improvement on the individual tracts are hereby made a part of this report to the
same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto.
Detailed maintenance activities on the enumerated parkway areas include:
the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing
for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation,
irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or treating for disease or injury; the
removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance, repair,
and replacement as necessary of all irrigation systems, and the removal of graffiti
from walls immediately adjacent to the cultivated areas.
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
Due to general deterioration, vandalism or loss various parkways within
the District will be renovated, repaired and replanted at an estimated cost of
$13,759.66. Based on historical data adjusted for inflation, it is estimated that
maintenance cost for assessment purposes will equal twenty -five cents ($.20) per
square foot for the fiscal year 1982 -83. These costs are estimated only, actual
• assessment will be based on actual cost data.
Y�
•
lJ
•
1982 -83 Engineer's Report
Landscape Maint. Dist. No. 1
Page 2
1931 -82 Estimated Assessment Cost
$.30 X 187,449 sq. ft. _ $56,234.70
$56,234.70 = 892 lots = $63.04
$56,234.70 less (695 X $34.92 or $24,269.40) = $31,965.30
695 lots X $28.12 ($63.04 - $34.92 surplus) + (188 +9) X $63.04 = $31,962.28
1981 -82 Actual Cost Summar
Contract Maintenance $12,524.33
Utilities 1,512,62
Administration 2,702.52
TOTAL $18,202.62
1981 -82 Actual Assessment = $28.12 X 695 + 197 X $63.04 = $31,962.28
Actual Assessment ($31,962.28) less Actual Cost ($18,202.62) = $13,259.66 CARRY
OVER FOR RESTORATION
1982 -83 Estimated Assessment Cost
$,20 Y. 199,936 square feet (revised per field measurement) _ $39,987.00
Restoration of Base Line Parkway from Ramona to Teak Way
Estimated at $13,759.66
SECTION S. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed Master Assessment diagram is attached to this
report and labeled "Exhibit A ". Detailed diagrams of each tract are included.
These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. Lot dimensions
are as shown on individual Tract Maps as shown in records of County Recorder.
TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1981 -83 = 892
ANNEXATION SUMMARY:
Tract No. of Lots *Assessable
P.M. 5922 4 0
Tract 10491 20 0
Tract 10569 42 0
Tract 9484 -1 47 0
Tract 9638 25 0
Tract 10045 -1 114 0
Tract 11350 16 0
Tract 9584 52 0
Tract 9584 -2 45 0
Tract 9441 72 0
D.R. 80 -34 1 0
Tract 11609 12 0
Tract 11696 6 0
Tract 10762 84 0
Tract 10277 -1 8 0
Total Lots 548 0
*NOTE: Only annexed Tract 607 occupied shall be included for assessment purposes
TOTAL ASSESSABLE LOTS 1982 -83 = 892
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS
WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Al FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1932 -83 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING,
AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION WITH LAND-
SCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT nl
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamong did
on the 7th day of July, 1982, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 82 -116
to order the therein described work in connection with Landscape Main-
tenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 82 -116 was
duly and leqally published in the time, form and manner as required by
lam, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention
on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in
this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work
and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having
now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work.
SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the
• City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience re-
quires the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Mainten-
ance District =I for the fiscal year 1982 -83, and said City Council
hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution
of Intention No. 82 -116, be done and made; and
SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by
the Enqineer is hereby finally approved; and
SECTION 3: Be if finally resolved that the assessments for
fiscal year 1982 -83 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report
are hereby approved.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1982,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
to
`"k
.0
•
Ll
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1982
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: ORDERING BETWEENN22ND STREETOANDFBTHNSTREETET CENTER AVENUE
LUCAS
Mr. Stephen Lucas of Lucas Land t ofa Center Avenue the alleyway.
22nd Street right of way, eas
22nd Street right of way is a 40' wide 1451long dedication, the east end of which
is connected to 8th Street through an alleyway (20'wide). No improvements
exist on 22nd Street nor on the alley.
Two existing residential structures at the corner of Center and 8th Street have
frontage on both Center and 8th Street. The two contiguous parcels on the
south and east of 22nd Street and the alleyway are large industrial lots with
an industrial building on one. Both of these lots are under the same ownership.
The subject street presently is not a part of any circulation system, and present
alignment is not suitable for orderly development of the adjacent areas.
Planning Commission considered this vacation at the meeting of June 9, 1982, and
has recommended City Council conduct a Public Hearing according to law.
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached is a Resolution ordering the vacation of the above described right of
way. If Council is in agreement with the subject vacation, the City Clerk
shall cause a certified copy of the Resolution to be recorded in the Office of
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California.
Res ectfully submitted,
LBH:EK:bc
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. ga_ )U �!
• �F
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF 22ND STREET AT CENTER
AVENUE AND ALLEY WAY, BETWEEN 22ND STREET AND 8TH STREET
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 82 -115, passed on July 7, 1982, the
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate
a portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and
set the hour of 7:30 p.m. on August 4, 1982, in the Lion's Park Community
Center Building, located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, California,
as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed
vacation; and
WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and
place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
as follows:
SECTION 1: The Council hereby finds all the evidence
submitt�d that a portion of 22nd Street at Center Avenue and Alley Way,
between 22nd Street and 8th Street is unnecessary for present or prospective
• public street purposes, and the City Council hereby makes its order
vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Map No. V -017 on
file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which
has been further described in a legal description which is attached
hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part thereof.
SECTION 2: The subject vacation shall be subject to the
reservations and exceptions, if any.
SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this
resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County, California.
SECTION 4: The Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be
in force.
PASSED, APPROVED, and AOOPTEO this 4th day of Auqust, 1982.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
•
EXHIBIT "A"
That 40' portion of 22nd Street abutting Lot 1, Block 66, North Cucamonga
as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 8, Official Records of
San Bernardino County, to the south; said portion being bounded on the
west by the east line of Center Avenue; on the east by the west boundary
line of Tract 2203 as per plat recorded in Book 34 of Maps, page 65
Records of said County; along with that certain 20' wide alley lying
easterly and abutting Lots 1 -12, inclusive, of Block 66, North Cucamonga
as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 8, Official Records of San
Bernardino County.
i
) 0 j
AFFIDAVIT OF PO)SMM
NoTicr OF HEARING
• FOR r,
VACATION OF STREET
STATE OF CALIFOR):L1 )
SS.
C(r!'M of SAN 11ERNAROU:O)
I declare, tinder penalty of making a fatse oath, thnt I am now, and at
all tlmes mentioned herein was, the duly appointed, qunlificd and acting Super-
intendent of Streets in the City of Rancho Curmmnngn.
Th.tt on the 21st day of July, 1982 1 caused to have
pnstr:! a Notice of Hearing for Vacation of Streets, a copy of which Notice is
nttarhed hereto nn;1 node n part hereof; that the Notices were posted not more
than three h•uiidred (300) feet apart along the line of the street and that not
lens than three (3) )latices were so posted: and thnt the posting was completed
• on the _ 21st day of July 19 82
This Do, r lornt inn Made This
U
_215 __ dnv ot.Ju1y 19 82
Superii en dent of Streets of
the C y of Rancho Curnmongn
P r.
C"
ClC\gn
°• CITY OF RA\ICHO CUC, \\10 \G:\ p
� Y ENGINEERING DIVISIOv
Nun VICI \IT1 MAP, I�
page
A
0
- M maou
III m o
t
h
_a r 9
cc
W
2 �g 3
5
e 22nd. ST,
Bets
O
- L25 AC MA �
M
NSP 80� -36 -2F.
n
P6R IiQ. r3 Iv- -I
• ,^ CITY OF RANCHO C C \NIONGA A
V
i= ENGINEERING DIVISION T
irn -- VICINITY NIAP
U Page
I
•
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council
FROM: Richard M. Dahl
Councilman �tc�i
SUBJECT: Parks and ails Proposal
Present Method:
1. Closed to the Public
2. One -man Department
3. Too much responsibility to
activily pursue private sector
volunteer funding and /or labor
4. Public relations must take back
seat to busy schedule
5. Discourages public input because
of busy schedule
6. Tendency to handicap communi-
cations
7. One individual (with possible
input by staff and /or council)
setting priorities
Ratfoualo
June 29, 1982
0 GuCAA10�9
,( Pr,
�L 9
C', O
F � Z
U.`
1977 1
Commission Method:
1. Open to the Public
2. Five n _people_ #volved in the
decision- makijag process
3. Would encourage private sector
funding and /or labor
4. Ability to improve public rela-
tions through the Press and guest
speakerships
5. Would encourage public input
6. Opens communications between city
and community
7. Allows community input toward
setting priorities
It is my belief that closed government is bad government. The more open
government is, the more it encourages citizen participation and opens the
necessary communication lines that is so necessary for government in the decision -
making process.
With the possible changes anticipated by Sacramento to the Quimby Act, it will
become more apparent that if we wish to be responsive to the needs of our city,
we must rely more and more on (encouraged) volunteer funding and /or labor. En-
City Council .
June 29, 1982
Page 2
couraging social and service clubs, industrial and business leaders, and
concerned citizens to become involved can only be accomplished through open
government and open communication.
RM➢:ba
/ 0 �
•
•
a
u
r1\�
u
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G1 CAAj°,
STAFF REPORT �? °_°
r
y � A
F_ Z
J�>
197
July 30, 1982
TO: City Manager and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager
RE: Recommendations Regarding Revisions to Ordinance No. 87
Establishing a Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission
At the City Councils request, staff has reviewed the Ordinance
establishing the Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission to determine
potential ways of improving the level of participation by individual
members of the Commission and identifying organizational changes
that could be made to improve the overall effectiveness of the
Advisory Commission. The following report will hopefully outline
some viable options for the Council to consider.
At its June meeting, the Advisory Commission discussed potential
areas of change to improve the overall effectiveness of the
Advisory Commission. The following represents Commission recommenda-
tions that the City Council may wish to consider in attempting
to improve the overall effectiveness of the Advisory Commission:
1. Formalize the Structure - The Commission suggested that
each of the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga and
Etiwanda appoint a Chairman to help encourage individual
participation and consider the appointment of a single
chairman (chairperson) and alternate for the entire
Advisory Commission. Currently meetings are chaired on
a rotating basis with little formal structure on the
community (Alta Loma, Cucamonga, Etiwanda) level.
2. Encourage Conmunicat ion - The Advisory Commission felt
the overall par Cicipa[ ion would improve if mare individuul
participation and communication was encouraged at the
Community (sub- committee) level. Upon creation of the
Advisory Commission, it was common for each of the sub-
Ir /
Continued....
Revisions to Ord. 87
July 30, 1982
Page Two
committees to meet on a separate basis apart from regular
committee- commission meetings to discuss issues within
their own communities. More recently, this participation
at the local level has been less frequent.
3. Appoint City Council Delegate to Advisory Commission -
The Commission recommended that a City Council delegate be
appointed to attend regular Commission meetings to encourage
communication between the Advisory Commission and City
Council. Council delegates could be appointed on a
rotating basis or alternates assigned.
4. Advisory Commission Exposure to Commuaity - It was suggested
that Ghe Commission's role and activities be more publicized
to encourage citizen participation and create a general
awareness of the the importance of the Commission. Several
suggestions included Grapevine coverage of the Commission
activities, more acknowledgement from the City Council of
Commission accomplishments, and publicizing the mechanics
for making input to the Advisory Commission.
0
5. Chamber of Commerce Exposure - The Commission, as stated •
in number 4, felt Commission activities needed more com-
munity exposure and expressed a need for the Chamber of
Commerce to be more cognizant of Commission activities and
their role in the Community.
6. Broaden Scope of Commission Activities - Although the
Commission has been involved in review and prioritization
of all major City capital projects from Carnelain realign-
ment and landscape improvements to utility undergrounding,
the Commission feels their responsibilities should in some
way be broadened.
7. Delegates) to City Council - The Commission encouraged
appointments of commissioners to serve as delegates to the
City Council to improve communication and liaison activities
between the City Council and Advisory Commission members.
In addition to the above Advisory Commission suggestions, the City
Council may wish to consider other potential areas for improving
the effectiveness of the Advisory Commission.
Continued.....
Ian
•
Revisions to Ordinance 87
July 30, 1982
• Page Three
0
A. Attendance Policy - A formal policy establishing attendance
rules should be considered and adopted by resolution as
suggested in Ordinance No. 87 creating the Advisory Com-
mission. Whatever attendance policies established should
be enforced. However, this may be a mute point if the
role of the Advisory Commission is expanded or the
mechanical changes in the Advisory Commission improve
the level of participation.
B. Variation of Meeting Policy - Currently meetings are held on
the fourth Thursday of each month with the exception of a
summer recess in the months of July and August. The City
Council may wish to consider some variation of that policy.
For example, meetings could be held on a quarterly, every
other month, or on an as needed basis. Unless the role
of the Advisory Commission is greatly expanded, less
frequent meetings may provide for more "concentrated"
agendas and possibly improve the level of participation.
C. Expansion of Advisory Commission Role - The attached memo
of May 18, 1982 outlines some potential areas for expanding
the Advisory Commission role. The intent of the memo was
to identify some alternatives for expanding the basic role
of the Commission and was not intended to down play the
importance of a separate Parks and /or Trails Coranission.
Combining these roles may not be compatible but it does
provide a convenient option for expanding the Advisory Com-
mission role.
D. Terms of Office - Currently terms of office for Advisory Com-
mission members are four years. The City Council may wish to
consider limiting terms of office to two years to provide a
more "concentrated" length of office. There are, however,
obvious advantages to four year terms on allowing members to
become acclimated and provide time to become a knowledgeable and
productive member of the Advisory Commission.
E. Council Committee to Study Advisory Commission Role - The City
Council may wish to consider appointing a Council Committee of
two members or formally appointing "delegates" as suggested by
the Commission to review the role of the Commission when meetings
are resumed in September. Communication between the City Council
and Advisory Commission may help identify some additional. areas
to
Continued....
Revisions to Ordinance 87
July 30, 1982
Page Four
for improving individual participation and the overall
effectiveness of the Commission. Once these are identified,
suggested changes could be incorporated into a revised
ordinance and considered by the City Council in October.
RECOMIENDATION: That the City Council direct staff (if appropriate)
to prepare a revised ordinance incorporating adopted changes to
improve the level of individual participation and the overall
effectiveness of the Rancho Advisory Commission.
tj
JHR /vz
Attachments: 1. Ordinance No. 87 Establishing Rancho Cucamonga
Advisory Commission.
2. Minutes of October 17, 1979 and October 3, 1979 •
establishing an Advisory Commission.
3. Minutes of October 4, 1978 appointing members to
the Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Committee.
4. Minutes of July 19, 1978 detailing a staff report
regarding the creation of an Advisory Committee.
5. July 13, 1978 Staff Report re: organization of
Community Advisory Committees.
6. June 21, 1978 Staff report regarding Creation of
Advisory Committee for Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and
Etiwanda Communities.
1/0
0
u
•
",, .
MEMORANDUM
U
May 18, 1982
TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager
FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manager
RE: Combination Advisory Commission /Parks and Trails Commission
OPTIONS:
1. Have the Advisory Commission serve in both_ capacities similar
to City Council /Redevelopment Agency. When the Advisory Com-
mission completes agenda items they move on to Parks and Trails
Commission business. This will allow Advisory Commission members
to participate in Parks and Trails issues and visa versa. This
will help improve agenda format for Advisory Commission (broaden
it) and expand role of Parks and Trails Commission so that they
fully understand and appreciate consequences of their actions on
issues not related to Parks and Recreation.
Create sub - committee of Advisory Commission to serve as Parks
and Trails Commission. This will insure representative parti-
cipation from each of the three areas of Alta Loma, Cucamonga
and Etiwanda. It will also insure a sub - committee of individuals
who already have a working knowledge of the City and the difficult
issues up ahead. There are currently three vacancies on the
Advisory Commission. One in Alta Loma Dennis Stout) and two
in Cucamonga (Chuck Buquet and Faye Stamper). Additional people
could be added who have a specific interest in Parks and Trails
Commission /sub - committee through attrition. Also a review of
those currently serving should be conducted to ascertain their
interest in continuing to serve on the Advisory Commission.
Because of a lack of attendance by some members or a lack of
interest or conflicts with other committee appointments, additional
vacancies could be created to infuse "new blood" into the process.
Continued....
Combination Advisory Cormission /Parks and Trails Commission
May 18, 1982
Page Two •
3. Rotation of Advisory Commission /Parks and Trails Commission.
variation of Alternative Number 1, with the addifl�onof rotating
meetings. As an example, the Advisory Commission would sit as such
for six months and another six months as Parks and Trails Commission.
In other words, meetings would be held monthly with the same 15
members serving as an Advisory Commission in January, Parks and
Trails Commission in February, the Advisory Commission in March
and so forth. The appropriate staff would be available at each
of the meetings.
While it may be the wish of Council to create a separate Parks and
Trails Commission, these alternatives represent a method of expanding
the role of the Advisory Commission, while at the sane time combining
two Commissions that would hopefully have the best interests of the
City in mind in their advisory decision making capacity. It has
been my experience in working with the Advisory Commission for the
past three years that interest wanes when a variety of "meaty"
issues are not available for review and comment. While there are
certainly a great many Parks and Trails Commission and Advisor
Commission "issues ", there may be some merit in combining these two
responsibilities to create an atmosphere of continued high interest
among the members rather than peaks and valleys. •
I still need to prepare a report to you and the City Council regarding
some of the concerns stated by the City Council regarding the Advisory
Commission as it now exists. Chief among their concerns included
exploring ways of strengthening the Advisory Commission, evaluating
attendance and interest of current members, and an objective review
of the ordinance establishing the Advisory Commission. I hope to have
this report completed in the very near future and well in advance of
the June 16, 1982 City Council meeting. Please let me know if there
are some specific issues that you would like me to deal with in my
report.
JR /vz
t�
1�
•
J
•
L
•
ORDINANCE NO. 87
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CtTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NANCHO
CUCA.9ONCA. CALIFOR91Y, CREATING AN ADVISORY CD)MISSION
TO ACT 14 AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO 'ME CITY COUNCIL AND
FW4114G COMMISSION.
9,e City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Theta i. hereby created and established in the city an
Advlsmry Comisslon.
Rote of Advisory Commission
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucmonga Advisory Cmmisslon shall met in an
advisory capacity to the City Counell AM Planning Camiss/on on community
issues and p.rfon such they advisory function. as my be delegated to
the Advisory Commission, from time to time by the Planning Commission or
City Council.
Advistre Commission Membership
SECTION 1: The Advisory Committee shall consist of • total of fifteen
(here with five (5) appointed firms each of the [Mee (1) 6eographfc
areas designated by tip code in the City of gancho Cucamonga, namely
Alta tom. (91701), Cucamonga (91710), and Etivanda (91719). Members of
the Advisory Camiutmn shall be residents of Rancho Cue among. and
.hall be appointed by cha City Council. The Mayor shall submit to the
Council the name of any person proposed for appointment to the Advisory
Commlcsion and upon such appointment by the Council, the name of the
appointee shall be recorded In the minutes of the Council meting.
Terms of Appointment
SECTION 4: The fifteen (11) members of the Advt.ety Commission
.nlu.11y appointed shall determine the length of theft tens by lot.
Thereafter all terms shall be for four (4) years. Three (1) pesters from
each of the three subaomm lecees (Alta Lome), (Cucamonga), and (Eti ... do)
shall serve a tern of fou r (4) Year. and shall continue until that,
respective terms expire unless sooner removed 19 provided in this
Ordinance. Tw (2) members from each of the three (T) subcommittees
shall serve A term of Iw (2) year. and shall continue In otfie. utell
their respective terms expire unless sooner removed as provided in this
otdinonce. If is vacancy shall occur, that than by eapt,.tion of the
tart of office, it .hall be filled by appointment by the Mayor vith the
.pp .... I of the Council for the unexpired term.
Ramval of Member.
SFCTiM 55: Any member of the Advisory Cmrnlaxion may be removed at
any time by a majuricy veto of the City Council. in addition, the
Advl,e,y Cormissiou may recommend to the City Council r vni of any
masher of the Advisory Commission who has vlolaced any meeting u,trdanee
policies chat may be established by resolution.
&'Su?r Mee elnen
SECTTM A: Tim d.ta., np.a which and the hmO and place at .1,11 b a n
tvgninr meeting chat[ be Imld shall be fixed by ttuilitiun or minnte
action of the City C.00nr.l U.
O(firers
SECCTb,11 7: Rarh suhcarunittue of the ,Advisory Curmieeton .ball sel,t
deu rye reran to "'id' it regular m""irls on a mnntldy rntal ing
has ln.
II
`em
-W /
Minutes
SECTION A: The Secretary of the Come {sslon shall ceno. he minutes
of regular. Adjourned regular, and special meetlnNe t. be kept; and
shall, as soon as possible after Bath meeting, cause a copy of the
minutes to be focuseded to each member of the Coaisslan and to the City
Clack. The City Clerk or design.. mill serve as aecrnt.q for the Melee,
Canotss ton.
SECTION 9: no Mays shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall attest to the aas, ed the City Clerk shall cause the some to be
published wlthln fifteen (15) dap after its passage, at least one. in
Tile Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published In the
City of Ontario, California, and circulated In the City of Eancho
Cucamonga. California.
PARSED, "PROVED, mod ADOPM this 17th day of O<tnher,'1999
AYES: Schlosser, Mlkals, Paosoo, gridgas Pros[
WE$: Mon♦
"SEW: gone
AT PEST:
�`��it✓
City Clerk
Y
l
L
•
•
•
0
City Coundl Minnie,
October 17. 1979
rage I
J. P reel Map 4801: Approval of Parcel nap 4805, autherier City Clerk and City
Folio... to sign sop and forward for clard.".m. Locution: south side of Church
hetveen Ramona and Archibald.
RBSOLCTION No. 79 -85
r A 9I;SOLIT108 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T!!F. CITY OF WWC110
CVCIONCA, G\LIPORNA, APPROVINC PARCCL HAP NUMBER 6805,
(TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 4605).
k. Release of the follsaing bonds:
4ian__S,dFdilsi_ W76 0195 - Release of Scorn Drain (Nane.1 Lector of Credit.
Loratod an the vest side of Amethyst at Valley View. Amer: Harald E. Hiller.
LlItar of Credit (.Vol. drain channel) 417,600
T =,act 9298: Accept roads and release bond to Manfred Hall. Located on touch aide
of Vicar, Drive between Sapphire and Jasper.
Parforoence bond (road) $14,000
Tract 96T %: Accept roads and release bond to Chavater Realty, Ine, Located on
anion side of Move. between Beryl and llellman.
Performance bond (road) 910,000
•
5. PI: "LIE HF.ARIBOS.
I5 \. OrJi _onto No`88 before Cmmcil for nc,.Od read" wb lch I. tab l t shot a neat 5ve
nrl,raci_�n and x the. e_I ea A—I (limited ajri_cul0ure) to M -2 (heav\iindustrlai)
(nr 1d.i rrs min land locnted on 'he nortl: side of Arrow ximately LlW
_ Z.3PT_ —_
i¢ of [nt.f,t 5r Request by Meridian Constn¢[tan (zone Chnngc Keenest Soev
)9 -d8). Sniff report by Jack Wm.
ot,.
The mayor opened the, nesting for public hearing. Since there we To no coavee Its,
the public hnaring was closed.
Nation: Hwed by Pato.be, secandlid by Hlkels to adopt Ordinance No. 88 and waive
entire reading. Motion carried by fattening voce: AYES: Schlosser, liFels, Pal.,mer,
Br IJy , and Frost. ROCS: Minn. Title and number at rend by Wasvrrmxn.
OpOI::AN(.L !!0. 88 (second rc.id In,)
AN ORDO:A::CE OF THE CITY COL'NCIi. OF THE CITY OF ¢ANCHO
QCX11O ^O•\, CALIFORFIA, RF>.OM1NO ASSESSOR'S PARCCL NUMBER
'2V 011 -i9 FROM A -1 TO 1-1 FOR 11,51, ACIRES LOf:ATGO OS Mlle
NlIpTil SIDE OF ARROW, 000 FEET VAST OF INTCRST. \TL 15.
iu, nil M.:nm An, __17 her r C r, it Fnr nd i _Iii vbirhh tahl Lfir t R_M1r
L
pea: 6111 at,I iav Ine pal, l to hoari ng. .5 1 n•.v tl:e n• wnr,. no ,.unxrn te, Ill.
pill ic hr v :.Lrrd.
. ,. 1 envoi by 1.0"ill,, „nn.1.11" Hr hole to app: m Ordin:a,w :•n. 9! and n•
a,. rnUrr rervli nv:.
:h L.'1..rid I•• Lad ni,n .- n.vlwd A.1ipK the part wank I.. vnr cone vbn imy:irwl if
•
_u \dv 1 —ry 1nm„nlnn ,w b: m; n tin .al,e lew•I " In. l'L un,. :: I'll ml Ii. a.
• ate Lnl Ih.V '•e I inn 1 ,I Ihn Or.linan:1 cI., r l: L•I that Manor vLir1, ':. rand
,. I�c Inv,.
,.:.tin ,Le Nanaw Ca , dill v Car ,,i( .:d¢i.0 ry
. \ .ran:.,:, l .w m
e.h other .Wviwry Omrliana a. nav^bv .Isle Ka[•.I to Cm A.IVISm:• Goan lsa MOn IT.,
Ci[„ hCrum II MS; Itev
0. teer tl, 19]9
Pei c :
ti- a -to -t o,c by ie Planning Comm Lasioa or City Co•mcil."
The City nctornav stated that the Advisnry Commfsaion u crlc[ly an advisor:
Pro,, .Ind thvy had no decision making functions or bindtnq poli,v making fUCCEICas
.here 0, City Cnuneil aad Planning Comfs ^.loo did. It . ,ld m esnitam a char;,
to the erdinance to ehango [his,
Motion by Painmbo, s ..ded by Bridge to approve Orllnancc Nn. 87 and v I
entire «adill .as carried by the fillo.ing vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikelsc
Pale,.Dc, Bridge, and Frost. eOES: None. ABSENT. Naar. Title and Adobe[ real by
OHOII: \NC!' %0. 02 (second [coding)
AN ORDI:QYCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CCC.U!D C\, CALIFORNIA, CREATI':G AM ADVISORY CO:OIISSION
TO \CT I:I A., ADVISORY CAPACITI' TO THE CITY COUNCIL QlD
PU:,N1:•G :.O:DITCSION.
9C_OrLi m Yoy64 =G before Conncfl a __urcencv c A [o extrnL
tar : :.n c ration date. Retort by inch Lan
On Arms[ li. 1979 the City Council approved an of Ordinance No. 64 to
So :•c nber
S. 1979. Hnotoor In light of recent developments end the progress of
the Gre::th Management Plan, it is overlisary to consider an extension to the
ma ra,nr L:m.
Mayor ... red the mee ling for public hearfn,
Nee Gillis, Ruildin4 Ind. -,,, Assnriatien, eke in npprsitinn m no exta nsfan of
Ill, -.a rnmriun to A,c: t 1980.
Sinc, on ce else wished to addmw the Council, the mA,., closed Ike public
he.tri,,.
Lac aoacd the date in the ordinance v . nuly for LM1e e. xt eaa ion of [Ise m ratnrinm
and u4q not th, date for the r.r.mth `laoag -lent Plan. Ken Willis clarified [hap
he I rrfer,l, to the filing dates on the R,o.th m L plan. M .evor,
tiro b�i ildiog Industry .iAhed that [bc Grea::.B,e-untnPlen would be adopted
A daty to extend the moratorium . x dlsursed be Connril. Mr. Lam nnint "I not
th.. • rlic,l •luto .mal! be JAr•lary 1, 1980 if Ihu Conned IIIIA confidorL tbe,
.ould Ills An - Idirial, nn ch" firs[ reading durin.; hie .Act.
Notion: Moved by SPoRr, mh•d by Pah:mhn to ndnpc Ordinancc No. 64 -C,
iniort the .inco of laauaryo JU 198o in Section 2 and to .alVo ortlre rending.
Nn a na r rrtvd by collo.ine Vnt.: AYY.S: Srhinss "r, Miknlc, Palmrbo, Rridao, and
!:n Cfi: •lone. ADSLOT: Oon., Tttle 1111 nnmher rea.t by Va- ^;!r•.an.
adh ❑:al:Cl. ::u. 54 -C fur:eor,l
A': 'RDP ACI'r. 'IF Fill: C,IIY TI "IC.11, OP ^IF. F.IT'; Of
CLI... :.,.:, FN C: :bill,; Ill,: ill,a IIIPn :. �.,1 RY nPlll l..AA rl.
90. ••V d,e fl,%[IICn. rltr. I :N,:a:y Ill 111 a l'.
11
0
•
• L'io: cenncii 4inutev
0,- n•bcr ). 1919
page
5G_ cal ter Declaration am, l pa1e Cl,w_. 29- ON._4c r i d tan C an, 1 tiro.
Change of r an. from A-I (Eimic,d a,rtculture) to 4-2 (heavy iiednerliat) for 18.55
ect,s If land located on the north side of Arrow, alrproximately 1100 feet vast of
loterstate 15. The VL.antn, Comi>st.., recarnende.1 [hut tin• City Connell adopt
Ordin,nce Na- 88 approving the issuance of a Negative Declaration and Znne Change
NO. 19 -0S. Staff report by Jack Ilia.
Tit, meeting was opened for public hearing
nantel plies, one of the title o.mer, of the property and representing navid
Noyes, spoke in vgpo[c of the rove chat,. He stated he wished the record Lodi -
cute he appeared and supported the Issuance of a negative declaration and r
approval of the rote change.
The public hearing was closed
Mellon: Maved by Schlesseq seconded by Millais to approve Ordinance no. all, set
October 11 for second reading. and waive entire reading. Motion carried by
lollamin, veto: AYES: Schlosser. Mikel., Palomino, Bridge. Fro.I. 4OE5: None.
Title and number read by 9aeserman.
OlutufahcE N0. 88 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COLINCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO NCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZCNISC ASSESSOR'S
. -_ PARCEL PORNIER 229 - 021 -59 F M A -1 TO 11-2 FOR
M.56 ACRES LOCATED 01 THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW
• 1700 FEET FAST OF INTERSTATE 15.
•
5C. Leanest for an Ordinance establishing a Reecho Coconuts. Mots.,, comet lesion.
V, Advtsary Committee recommended Ordinance No. 82 be referred to the City Council
far consideration. The ordinance includes a statement on the general role of the
Advisory Cornissi4n, composition of membership, terms of appointment, cantonal of
n.•nkerr., meetings, officers, and minute taking. Staff raper, by Jim Robinson.
Grid, stated that Cout"I had received a letter requesting that the Committee
reflect input flow same of the industrial Stearns and service organizations instead
of Just bring a homeovnen' group. He felt chat perhaps Council should 0... War
th., ro,.va .
The m .Ain, as opened for public heath,
Mike Zinkin stated the Committee repro entul homcownc rs whose interest was In the
mitt' and that the group should comprise only Of citizens who are interested
In their eovmun l[y.
Sharon Ramer. .stated [hat net na the Committee atso walked in the ,...,all,.
Tm,v coon,, president of the Chiller of C..O,,,, read the following free a te¢cr
which lead h -•en sans to the CounclL
"it ix the regneat of the Board If Dirertnrs chat when v. atlas open. m, the
Advi u,ry Co -nit tee cal41dl'rat inn bo givrn LO JPpotOr i re It least o v indm Irf al,
•net: ,inl oriented Individnal to vich of the g, agrapili: 1111[1 vitliin rite
enmlitllc.. L.
Dan Cher, Advlsnry Con.mil,rw m ether, ,,atrd le: had naL Not at the m ,tin,, u
thin. i, 114.1 burn di se..... 0. Ile on, lined In Oho Cnnnctl hit opinions nn th,•1I
,. 1,n -itinn of the lnmmlttee.
117
Citv Council Minuces
October S, 1919
Page 5
Public ,oaring ..,l eloeed.
Mnpar made son s
e....... s regarding the nrdinnncc. He stated that Section 1
should reflect CheCmmcil's original intent to make the g ogrophic boundaries by
zip cud M
CS. not by Cac,miev name. Section L he felt that perhaps the tern
f .I office m y be too ion,.
1 Sch losaar vented to continue the item so he could have time to look into the
d iffcnnce between " mmiteec" and 'c zmisniome. Lauren Wasserman stated that the
Cayernm,ec Codc did not spell out any differences to the two terms. However, most
cities lead the term "cc-mission" when a group functioned independently and made
decisions apart from the Council; such as the Planning Commission and Hisrmrlcnl
n
Commissio.
Motion: Moved by Millais, seconded by Palumbo to approve Ordinance No. 87 with
the change using zip codes to identify the three communities, set October 17 for
second reading, and waive the entire reading. Motion carried by following vote:
AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo. Bridge, and Frost. NOES; None, Title and
number read by Wasserman.
ORBINASCE No. e] (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HAYCHO CUCAMOYCA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN ADVISORY
CIHISSIOM TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING CC: MISSION.
50. Vacation of a ortfon of Banyap Street - Tract 9444. Report by Lloyd Nubbs.
This is the second phase of abandonment of a partial of Banyan Street from Amethyst
to 100 feet ¢aster ly. The area cn be abandoned is being replaced by Te 1..11.0 of
Banyan through the tract developed of Trace 90. 9444.
Marion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Paiombo to approve gesolurion Ma. ]94]
o Mering the varation of A portion of Banyan, and to waive entire reading.
Meeting opened for Dnblic hearing.
Dot, Hone a ce.crOd the queetiam which bad heel Tatsed by Council as to who the
property owners V e re to the part, and south. On the northerly side the property
was led by Mark 111 Homes, To the south, the owner vas Mr. Bruebaker, a lemon
,rover.
The ynblie bearing u e claaed.
Motina by Bridge and n C onded by Palumbo to approve the Resolution was approved
by the fall wing open! AYES! Srht.eer. Mikels, Palpate, Bridge, and Frost.
Nar., None. Wasserman read title and number.
RESOLUTION NO. ]9 -]1
A RESOLUTION OF THii CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
l
OF RV:Cilp 000.IIUBfr\, CdLIFmRSIA, COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO. STATE. OF CALIFORNIA, OROCRIJC
TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET AS
SHOWN ON A MAP (N0. V -001) ON FILE IN TH5
L OTFtr OF THE CITY CLERI OF THL' CITY OF R \YC110
CIICaMUNI;A.
B. _CITY 4,V:MOR'N STAFF RL_POItTS.
Ad vy _ -v fnnnit Leg fur Revell of nrvlin_a. Win. to pro+_idlmq for
lLo .aL nr lab; ;r, Nana Elrwurk s. (te:n ImA been �In li tvI Ir,. t, A,!l, , earli.r
In .In• nev,,, and 1,1 lean ru fr ... d hawk ca Ill., Ultlory C1,11tI, tp .•a ui[b
.Ii ar rrnns in....... J. Mrer(m would la• held on •:nvec:M1cr l at n ple:e en be
noon unv..l Ia o•r.
city Council Mimrces
October 4, 1970
Page 5
CR➢SSTNC The Central School District Board of Trustees had
CUAADS requested that a crossing guard be placed at the inter-
section of Arehfhald Avenue Seed Church Street for
students at the Cucamonga Jr. High School. A survey
had been taken and nationally accepted traffic warrants
had been met, It was decided the Sol,..) District should
pay 50% of the cost of the erassfng guard.
Mr. John McCleery, Aseistanc Superintendent, was present
and spoke regarding, the needs for the crossing guards.
The School Board had not authorized the sharing of the
cost, therefore, he mould have to take this back to the
Board for approval.
Motion: Moved by West, a t onded by Palumbo to approve
the request by the Central School District Board of
Trustees for the placement of a crossing guard at
Archibald and Church at a cost to be shared at 50', with
the School District, and that the Sheriff's Department
quid be responsible for the personnel. Motion unanimously
..tried,
Mikele asked about the ocher requests for crossing guards
which the council had received. Wasserman said these had
been referred to the Traffic Committee.
• Co¢TCT Approval of a contract with John 91ayney sad Associates
Wi :l.4 \i TlIm'EY to prepare a toning as was tegweered by Sack Lan.
A_51 C1,1TZS
I FoA0^TI :G M_1AP Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by West to approve the
agreement with John 111,ray and Associates to do the
summa map and sign an agreement. Motion carried by the
following once:
AYES: Palomba, Mikels, Frost
NOES: West
ABSENT: Schl.....
L
RC(.-.SS At 905 p.m. Mayor Frost called a recesx. The meeting
reconvened at 9:35 p,n, with all pro son t.
The suhJecr of she Citizens' Advi::ory Committee apRnlnt-
ment uas inserted at this point in the agenda by the
Council.
From the 91730 (CUwmauga arc a)
I. Barren AU.., C11.11 11, J. guqu, t, 111, Evan n.
McW1, Faye E. Stamper, .7ose111, E. Stara, Jr.
It.. the 91701 (Alta Loma area)
Mary Parinv, Ilelcn nl an rhnr,l, Sh.nm R:mmoro, Denoi.n I..
Stoul, Ilichvl Zinkin.
From um 91719 Rlf..,ndo arm)
Donn I Do , Mar: V. Lane. r,l•nn hunk in, Lm• uld te,
John P. V4ulc.
Metlnn: Moved by P.,1 „rn,o, ea
c mlvWert d by W to arpr,, the
tar for . \dvi .o r: C.or.:i4err, 111 p m a; :aw-
mr,iv ar•. teed Ca, it rrgw•;n•d ,taR 1 a t
rvlrvn..,,.u, uW .n 11 , 11: un, -•r �:. tr n.•r 19 a.. ha', .,. r,
-. r
City Council Minutes
Jut, 19, 1918
Page 4
"v ISORY
Fmfi T'LES
K11:1S':. \Y
C¢:snccn10N
Mr. Was. ruse. presented a report regarding the Advisory
Committees. A written staff report had been presented
to each Council member. Briefly, each of the three
committees would cansist of five members each with two -
year terms on a rotating basis. They would all meet
at the fame time, thus cutting down staff time. Suggestion
s to have meetings at 4:30 p.m. -- perhaps rotating
the meeting place.
Staff representative to be Include would be the City
Manager or his designate.
Potential are.. of involvement were suggested in are, of
Planning, Park and Recreation, Transportation, Public
Safety, Community Goals, Capital Improvements Needs.
This list is only suggestive and not complete,
Discussion followed about the response from the application
which had been minimal. It was decided that each Council
ran appoint a representative from each of the three areas
to ee rve. City staff would sand an application form to
everyone who had applied to serve on the Planning Commission.
Wear hoped this mould also appear in the papers to give it
more publicity,
For a deadline -- August 31 was set with hopes to announce
xmbeu of the Committees on September 6. It was decided
to use a person's alp coda as representing the Community
he would be representing.
Schlosser felt there shonid be some rather strict regula-
elons for members of the Committees. For example, missing
three consecutive meetings would mean automatic replacement.
Mr. Wasserman regnestli this Item to be continued until
August 16. Request granted.
SpF tdL Mr. Fmpey made the presentation to hold a special census
CU bCS for Rancho Cucamonga. It was the only way the State
would agree to our ual population and w an needed to
determine the subvenhtona we would be alluund. Sn order
to have a special census the City Weald have to provtdc:
City maps, which would have to be now tied to Sacramento
prier to the census; office apace; c6ephones; ataf[tng; etc.
Cost to r.Odu,l tho census would be 5:1, Mq. Benefit: for
ample -- if the pu,clOLi.m w r at 42,00n, it vould take
the city app roximn[c Ip one year to recover.
Motion Moved by West, seconded by Palumho to approve the
special census with funds coming from the contingency I
fund, Motion Outmi.uusl, carried. L
EST.\IVJ'11117IL Mr, Ilubbs made the presentation which was a result of chnges
CLC:c6 11; - made at the July 19, 1918 meeting.
TRAII'IC RI'PORT
Mr. Wds,seemtn tend title of Resolution.
RFSOLEITIDN 9O. 74-40
A R6'SOLCTION OF Tor. CITY COUNCIL OF Till: CITY of
R.GCIIO CCC.CVF4.\, CALIFOR9[A. 'vSTANLIi;RCF THMOVGH
Hl(.hWAY .tNU TIUIFIC CONTROL'OLVILLS HIIHIN TIIL
City of R.l`xvo cl'CA`IO ^.C.1, 4
0
•
0
tl R M 0 R A N D D M
DATE: July 13, 1978
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren M. Idasserman
City Manager
SUBJECT: Organization of Community Advisory Committees
The City Council has requested the staff to prepare a more detailed recommenda-
tion concerning the formation and actual operation of the Community Advisory
Co::::aittees which were approved by the Council in June. The primary purpose
of these three advisory committees is to serve as advisors to the Council on
matters of concern in each of the three geographical areas which comprise the
City of Rancho Cucamonga,
ORGANIZATION OF ADVISORY CO2MITTEES
• It is recommended that each of the three advisory committees consist of five
members; elected for two year terms. The terms should he staggered, so that
initially some terms will be for one year while the remainder will be for two
years.
Recaose of the heavy demands for staff assistance, it is suggested that all
groups meet together on a monthly basis. Meeting locations should be rotated
throughout the City in order to encourage full citizen participation. It is
further suggested that meetings of the Advisory Committees be scheduled to begin
at 4:30 p.m. This schedule worked very well with the School Task Force.
STAFI' PARTICIPATION
It is recommended that the City Manager or his designated representative serve
as an ,ex- officio" member of the Committee. It is, in our view, essential that
a staff representative he in attendance in order to answer questions which may
nriso r.onleroinr City programs or policies. In addition, the staff will be
avni1a1110 to work with the Advisory Committees in preparing proposals for
CanSiderntien:i by the City Council.
POTEI:'r [Al. ARRAS OP INVOLVE ENT
The City's mmtagement team 1135 spent considerable time discussing the possible
• areas of involvenent for the Advisory Committees, The following list represents
same of the major policy Issues facing our City which mov be an appropriate area
of invnlvcment for our newly created Advisory Committees:
I " 06�'
' C C
City Council -2- duly 13, 1978
POTE;7TL1L AREAS OF INVOLVEMENT -- (continued)
1. Planning
Design Element
Architectural Review
Advance Planning
Mater Quality Issues
Air Quality Issues
Sphere of Influence
2. Park and Recreation
Regional Park Needs
Human Service Needs - Seniors, Handicapped, etc.
3. Transportation
Preparation of Circulation and Transportation Element
of General Plan ,-S�" �� y� y! •
Study of Equestrian Trail Needs 1
Study of Bikeway Needs
4. Public Safetv
Crime Prevention Programs
Neighborhood Alert Programs
Unmet Public Safety Needs
5. Community Goals _
City Name'��
City Identity
Community Promotion
Historic Preservation
Civtc /Community Town Center
6. LaA ita1 Imp cavemen[ "ICeds
Establish Priority Program for City's Needs
is
� h N
u
City Council -3- July 13, 1978
INFORMTION'AL FLOW
It is extremely important that our Advisory Committees be fully informed re-
garding City programs, priorities and policies. Therefore, all members of
the Advisory Committees will receive copies of the agendas for both CitY
Council and Planning Commission meetings. In addition, excerpts of staff
reports concerning issues which may affect any of the three geographical areas
of the City will be included with the copies of the agendas. In this manner,
members of the Committees will have an opportunity to review the issues and
the staff reports prior to the meetings of the Planning commission or City
Council. Ali
(`
AREAS OF CONCERN
The City management team is very concerned that the Advisory Committees not
usurp the responsibility and authority of either the Planning Commission or
the City Council. For this reason, we have provided opportunities for members
of the Advisory Committees to keep abreast of current issues by reviewing
agenda materials on a timely basis. On current issues - particularly those
relating to land use planning - the committee members will have an opportunity
to state their views at the Council or Planning Commission meetings.
• If the Advisory Committees are to he workable, a major commitment of staff
ti-.o .inl financial resources is essential. The preparation of agendas and
reports for the Conmittees will result in added expense to the City as well
as a loss of ova ilab le staff tine. By limiting the number of meetings scheduled
each month, the staff will still have time to deal with not only day -to -day
issues, but, more importantly, the long -range City policies and programs which
are an essential element of any successful, well - managed municipality.
The forn.ntion of Advisory Committees also requires that certain trade -offs be
made. The success of the committees is, in our view, dependent upon a com-
mitment of staff resources. Staff involvement in committee activities reduces
till tiro available for hoth day -to -day and long, term priorities. !lost other
cities whicl, have utilized advisory cor.mittrus have also provided a full -time
staff liaslon. Rancho Cucamonga could neither justify nor afford this luxury.
In addition, il, should he noted that there are expenses related to till
forr,ntion of Advisory t.Omril.t"I'S. Staff timr, .tltheu gh net a "direct, hard
dn]laY uxp "use'" is an indirect expanse to the (.ity because skiff would be
working on other projects if it were not involved in the Advisory Committee
work. postage, re�rodurtlnn costs, and other related expenses will also be
absorbed in the current year's operational budget.
It is significant to note that the potontint problems are not pointed nut merely
to cost .t negative view toward the creation of the Advisory Committees. Rather,
• we want the City Council and the Cilfzpns of Rancho Cucamongl to be fully
aware of not Only the positive, but also the negative aspects of the Advisory
Curmitlae formulation. The Citv Council may be assured that Lite staff will
make every effort to carry out the directive of the Citv Council to imple-
mcnt tho Advfnory Cu:ran it [:c proposal.
C
City Council -4- July 17, 1978
•
In surmary, the role of the Advisory Committees can be meaningful to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, particularly, since those committees can provide
a valuable link between the City Council and the citizens of Rancho
Cucamonga. It is vitally important, however, that the activities of these
groups not undermine or interfere with the responsibilities of either the
Planning Commission or the City Council. Those responsibilities have been
clearly designated in the State law, and they cannot be delegated to any
other group.
Ur.::baa
C '� 1'
lJ
•
• City CO.Ocil AgOnd,, -3- .Inn,, 21, 1918
G. PUII.IC Iit :.1R fNG: APPEAL OF PWNINO COttlISSIC.: OrICiSIn): - penlnl of Zone
Vari.tnce W87 -51 Walter and Gavle White.
Mr. and tics. libite previously requested Planning. Commission approval of
s riance to split a Li a e parcel for tho purpose of building
their personal residence. If approved, the remainder of the parcel
ou to he used ITT the purpose of building another house for r sale.
According to the plans submitted to the Planning Commission, o n of the
ting lots would be. less then the m area cenui,teentof the
sting R1- 20,000 zone. The remaiain, parcel would be approximately
13,300 square feel.
The action taken by tb0 Planning Commission was to deny e1e, zone variantn
request based on the findings that the surrounding property owners purchased
the properties with the eapec ration of nirimcm rr acre purcols. In addition,
vas expressed regarding environmental factors and potential problems
with <essyools.
N. PCDLIC 112ARING: APPEAL OF PLANNING CO•NISSIOV DECISION - Site Plan Approval
M96-73 (Request for i,. plan a Mal of Mobil Oil Service Station).
Mobil oil Co. and Property tnvestmen is Nest, Inc. have appealed the
decisinm of the Planning COOT OT denying a self- service station 04
denying the modification of a lowlian and development permit which was
originally submitted pli.c to the City'a incorporation.
- -- The a anlmous denial of the application was based on the recommend at ton
• of the County Planning Department and was based upon the following findings:
1. That the site propo. %ed L s not adequate in sire and shape to accommodate
said use for parking and loading areas.
2. That the site for the proposed use has inadequate access as the
site [.lams to streets and highways properly designed as . width and
improvement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic genetated
by the proposed use.
3. The sign standard has not been met.
6. A service station would not be in harmony wich the original concept
of the shopping center.
]. Staff Retorts
A. REPORT RrC..ARDC:C CAFATIn4 OF ADVISCiY C0ICIITL FOR ALL\ Lo`- CUCAh109GA,
�D ETIWANDA C>1`1U1lTII:S.
Tbo city Council has ask.d the staff to prep,.. a report and r endation
vain, th, c e.,li.n of Advisory Councils from each of the tbrnemco nitlss
whlcb commis. the Cie, of ith,,l Cucamonga. It is 'lo'clyd chat a five -
eobe, Advi,cly Cools ii be eprointrd from ear11 of lho communities to advise
the, City Co; it , 'mtrvra relating to InnA -n er 11.11.11,1,, 11.1— Inrtatten
and r relation yWnnLml, proirn.ed capital improvement n, and rcvl.w of
nlfi(.lnt 1)1141P, ^11ry Item,. In .addition, each ;Advisory Cnerril could ho
a sst FOrd ,, c" J". elhrr problems wh1rh may b. a.vI,n,d by t1). City Golrneil.
It 1, rr r ad.d drat term, .f office , rrh Adv1 v Cnrrnruev
be (0r
lw, ud 'hot t""':
"r "1"
•ntlnulty rn the
Adv'rs011 ferinrl l'.. It Is
funircr 11 .r....d that 110, Cily
1: it rrqucsl
tba r
in T.orvinji • .Wvi ely 11-11
.r P I`I )' in thr City
C, 'em, Inh Tbr Clly fnnm
il ell ,i.. wi slln [o < Ii. it r, ran
it v flan lh.
•
A10 L. r Cie tabs of Gnvvs
e, Ih,• II i" md,, tier, l le Ch11'.m,ml
Inlat
then Rein :lle
Y,u o , Clr Ob, I of C—
5C.If f in, fnr tlr., At. r. �1
. tS nua lie ;hOU Id r 1L-0 by
rv11
the Cl L
1m1rAer
er h1, 1, j, ev rn t d l i yr
la .,la, sup,. +trd that t :i0'
.111. it
servo .. an ulf it ul,
nnn Muting Ilauon to oath nfc the
three advisory
gruep.a
City Council Agenda -4- Juno 21, 1978
It is the staff's view that the creation of Advisory Councils for Etivanda.
Cucamonga, and Alta Lonna may he extremely helpful to the City. Hhilc
t2 fs prEbnble that 'fill advisory groups will he interosted prima. ilv i
planning issues initially• the groups can serve as an excellent vehicle
for informing the Ci'y Council of hew the citizens of Reach. Cucamonga
feel regarding major policy questions in our City.
If the City Council wishes to establish Advisory Co:ocils. the City staff
will in... poste he rout.. of all development plans into our procedures
for handling all planning issues. It is recommended that no development
plans be Iorvarded to the City Council until it Isis been E.tlawed by tho
appropriate advisory council. In many instances, comments may be solicited
from all three advisory groups.
In summary, Elie creation of thren Advisory Councils may help spmewhaL
to preserve the community identity which has been discussed during our
General Plan mocltn,,. 'lore importantly, the proper use of Advisory
Councils may strengthen our overall planning process considerably by
providing greater oppnrtuni[v for input from our citizens. with the recent
reduction i n venues for munieipaLitles, it may continue to be necessary
to seek the views of our n
citizens o a regular basis regarding the
services which we need in our City.
B. REPORT ON STATUS OF PENDING ZONE CHANGES
. _ The following zone change requests have been received by the Planning
Department. However, due to their nature, some have a reasonable probability
of being inconsistent with the proposed General Plan.
1. Proposal: Zone change from F -P -2 to H-3 487 -71 C%
Lsoollen: S/s Baseline, .,pros 775' Win Vineyard -N
A,liaantt Jerry Rodgers / f
Analysis: Site is located in a flood control basin with commercial
and public school to the north sad a park to he east.
Zoning is F -P -2 to the east and south and R -1 10 the aortb
and ve.at. The proposals for the General Plan calls for
various residential densities and flood control.
2. Proposal: Zone than,, fmn 7,000 -R -0 -T to A -I 994 -66
Location: Nis 19th Se. approximately 135' N/o Amethyst
Applicant: Kenneth Bylor
Analysts: Site is located in an existing residential neighborhood with
R-3 zoning on the vest, north and east. To the seutl, is A -1.
The applicant is requesting the A -I zone to permit a commercial
nursery. The proposals for the General Plan calls for
residential or mix uses.
1. Propo .a l: Zone change from R -I to C -2 997 -82
L.E.,O on; E/s Archibald .,pro. 150' N/o Oeven St.
Applicant: Freda Shelley
Analysis: Site is locoed in an as'tahllxhed residential noigbborheed.
with 9-1 zoning < proposals eudtno. The prop for the General
Plan calls for residential.
4. P,,a —l: Zone 1h.1,v from A -1 to C -2 1121 -81
Lora Hunt Ruh, Iho inr,I sir Lion of Fluil, 111 and in ten to le 15
A,Iir. ;o t: 14111lam lame; I ry
Analvals: Tie, sit, Is lo,, d in am un, ...to,cd a r The .min,
1'., ,1 -i i all Jirvvtilull .tlh C -2 A Y -t further vrat. The
General Plan proposals calls for major industrial.
0
•
11
0
•
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1982
TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City
FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development
BY: Joan A. Kruse, Administrative Secretary
SUBJECT: WORD PROCESSING SYSTEM
Included in the adoption of the City's budget for fiscal year 1982 -83
was approval by the City Council of a word processing system for the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. Attached for your information is a study
that was completed last year by the Community Development Department
which evaluated the performance of nine word processing systems. Based
upon that study, it was determined that the system manufactured by
NBI, Inc. would best meet the current and ongoing needs of the City by
being able to provide not only text editing capabilities which would be
utilized by the Community Development Department, but contribute towards
the information management needs of the City Clerk's office through its
records processing program.
Features unique to the NBI system are its ability to act as a shared
logic as well as standalone system thereby providing necessary memory
capacity with independent function should something happen that would
affect the memory storage. It contains rigid disk storage for long
projects such as the General Plan, Industrial Specific Plan and Devel-
opment Code in addition to its storage capability on floppy disks.
Other features are:
- Phrase dictionary
- Recorded tabs - left flush, right flush, decimal, center
and dot leader
- Display documents by: directory, author, last date re-
vised, wild card search
- Directory password security
- Document password security
-Time and date tracking
- Automatic outline format
- Automatic index creation
- Automatic table of contents
-24 entry queue
The records processing feature contained within the system provides the
capability to sort by alpha and numeric in ascending or descending mul-
tiple fields. Additionally, it will communicate with other systems such
as Xerox, IBM, Wang as well as computers such as the Vector system cur-
rently used in the Community Services Department so that in the future
interface can be had for a City computer system, a definite plus.
J /
August 4, 1982 •
Staff Report -2_
Nord Processing System
NBI continually updates its equipment and has been at the top of in-
dependent ratings in word processing systems for the past five years
because of its ability to interface with other systems and computers.
This feature should meet the City's future needs.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize purchase of the NBI
word processing system based on the pricing and configuration as listed.
R pectf l�y submitted, LO
JACK LAFI, PICP
Community Development Director
JL:JK:ik
Attach.
r
�� L
n
•
•
•
V MEMORANDUM v�
oil
U.i
1977
DATE: October 13., 1981
TO: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
FROM: Joan Kruse, Administrative Secretary
SUBJECT: WORD PROCESSING STUDY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A comprehensive study of nine manufacturers of word processing equip-
ment resulted in the recommendation of three systems for further
evaluation by the Community Development Department. These three
systems are:
Lexitron - VT 1303 with Informa
N81 System 3000 with System 8 ICU
Royal 7000
Cost comparison was based on the same configuration of two keyboards
and a shared printer for all systems. The criteria was identical in
evaluating system performance and function and is contained in the
report that follows.
The three systems that are recommended appear to meet the current and
ongoing needs of the Community Development Department as efficient
tools in reducing workload and addressing the human factors that
arise when changes occur. While the technological functions of word
processing have been addressed, further study and consideration is
recem.,;ended to provide proper support for the equipment after purchase
from the human relations standpoint. This study sought to recommend
the best equipment for our use only and the results might differ in
another application and setting.
Respectfully subm itted,
Joan A. Kruse
Administrative Secretary
Attach.
�„ 7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORD PROCESSING STUDY 0
BACKGROUND: Because the City of Rancho Cucamonga is interested in and
promotes modern management techniques, the acquisition of word processing
equipment by the Community Development Department was considered and ap-
proved by the City Council in their budget sessions April 6 and May 5, 1981
for the current fiscal year. Word processing is a highly organized system
of efficient and economical combinations of people, procedures and equip-
ment. These elements aid in increasing productivity, conserve time and
overall, improve the quality of typewritten communications.
The Community Development Department with its three divisions generates
a substantial amount of typed copy. The varied paperwork which flows
through the department is especially suited to the basic text - editing
capabilities of word processing equipment. In order to find the best
equipment to meet the needs of the user, a comprehensive study was con-
ducted of nine vendors. The attached decision matrix will provide the
criteria used in the evaluation process to determine those three systems
which would best fit the needs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It should
be noted that the same criteria was applied to all vendors and included
"hands on" testing of the equipment by the Planning Department Mag Card
Operator, Karen Paul. She contributed substantially to the selection
process.
PROCESS: With the exception of the Savin and Royal word processors, the
process consisted of demonstrations by each vendor of their equipment at
their locations in order to best exhibit their system's performance. In
one -half of the demonstrations, marketing support representatives and not •
sales personnel operated the equipment. In those instances where support
representatives gave the demonstrations, the observation was made that
17,;
-z-
• the equipment appeared to be easier to operate and questions that we had
were better and more definitively answered. The conclusion was that the
equipment demonstrated by the marketing representatives highlighted the
systems most favorably. .
A decision matrix was devised to evaluate the equipment in the same manner.
As was mentioned previously, hands on testing of the equipment was done so
that each system could be compared in the same manner. A test using mag
card formatting was devised and consisted of a typical boiler plate letter,
text- editing, and reformatting as was used in the General Plan text. The
decision matrix includes such items as:
. Ease of operation - whether mnemonic codes or extensive
"menus" are required
• Editing capabilities
Price -
Operator comfort
Training
Support service
Maintenance
Expansion capabilities
Computer interface capabilities
Space requirements
Delivery
Responsiveness during evaluation process
All proposals are based upon two keyboards with CRTs, and one interfacing
printer. System design is varied with most equipment having standalone
• capability .chile some use a shared logic concept which provides additional
memory.
t1
-3-
An analysis survey of the paperwork flow was not conducted to determine
the general functions now being performed and the amount of time required •
for completion. In view of the fact that management requested word proces-
sing equipment in this budget, it was felt that the kind of typing that is
presently being done would be completed more efficiently and enhanced by
word processing equipment. This study concentrated on the nuts and bolts
by analyzing hardware requirements and fringe benefits associated with
each system, machine configurations, cost, timing and ability to use cur-
rent floor space requirements.
Of the nine systems surveyed, three were eliminated due to equipment type
and vendor non - responsiveness. It should be noted that for purposes of
finding the best equipment for our requirements, the following vendors were
examined:
CPT
A. B. Dick
IBM (System 6 and Display Writer)
Lexitron
NBI
Royal
Savin
Wang
Xerox
The task was to select three vendors that would best suit the department's
needs after testing. The result is that Lexitron, NBI and Royal emerged
•
as having the best features for our purposes. In doing the study, it
was shown that there is no one system that can fulfill all of our wants. .
These three, however, would be very acceptable and perform all department
requirements.
1 r
's
-4-
ANALYSIS: A comparison of the vendors' equipment disclosed the following:
•
CPT
- Standard typewriter keyboard, including touch which was not
electronic and did not react as quickly as other systems.
- Although CPT used key commands, commands were extensive in
order to perform each task.
- Use of black and white screen was found to cause more eye
fatigue than the more typical green screen.
- Did not have a cursor which made it more difficult to locate
words for correction or to move text as quickly as other systems.
A.B. Dick
- This was a shared logic system. Basic unit had 11K memory
and a CPU providing an additional 65K. Total memory was
less than most standalones.
- Did not have proportional spacing, although this was to be
• added to enhanced software package in near future.
- Did not have automatic hyphenations.
- Marketing response was nil. Marketing representative did not
provide any information or pricing after demonstration although
he was asked to do so and was advised through follow up.
Wano ;triter
- Very heavy menu.
- Mnemonic codes, although not called that by vendor.
- Equipment not compact
- CPU hard disk extremely noisy (sound attenuation not available).
- Cues not automatically hyphenate
- Does not display full page, and less than most, with 21 lines
of display.
- Hight -hand justification on printer only - you would not be
able to see what copy looked like until hard copy is produced.
• - Indexing only on CIS
Printing slower than :Host, 40 cps.
,p"
Xerox
IBM
-5-
- Marketing representative and personnel were not adequately •
prepared for demonstration which had been scheduled for
approximately three weeks.
- Heavy menu operation with many prompts.
- Several commands required to perform most operations.
- Equipment bulky.
- Cursor placement not precise.
- Heavy menu and prompts.
- Keyboard very similar to mag card and consequently more difficult
to learn than other word processing equipment.
- Has string search'rather than key search to locate information
through unique characteristics.
- Right -hand justification in machine- printer only.
- Commands appeared to be more extensive. •
- Self -paced training program. Used as selling feature because
of cost reduction.
- Textpack 4 which would bring equipment into basic conformance
with other systems being evaluated would not be available until
February 1982.
- IBM would require that you do your own installation. They show
you how and you do it.
- All software is on rental basis only and cannot be copied for
use in other keyboards. Also, software increases in price
with each update thereby increasing cost to user.
- System 6 originally presented to Community Development Director
was dismissed from consideration due to hardware orientation and
equipment size. Additionally, keyboard was as difficult to learn
as mag card machine currently in the department.
All word processors were examined for capability of interface with data
processing equipment. Most of the systems, including the three that are
reconniended, have that capability. With the exception of the Lexitron, •
all word processors would require a dedicated circuit for each system.
M-2
Cost estimate for the installation of electrical wiring is approximately SM.
• Of the three word processing systems that have been recommended, one, the
NBI 3000 utilizing a System 8 ICU, is a shared logic system. While it does
provide additional storage capacity, the possibility exists that should the
ICU malfunction, the entire word processing system would be inoperable.
NSI is recoamended, however, because of its sophistication and advanced
features such as automatic outlining which would lend itself to the pro-
duction and update of such documents as the Zoning Ordinance. There is
adequate expansion capability in the system for future city -wide use.
In checking references of NBI with current users, including SWA who pro-
duced the Victoria document on it, the system was given marks of excellent.
NBI claims to have the highest ratio of support to sales personnel and is
internationally marketed by TRW. Response time is guaranteed to be four
• hours. There is the possibility that response time can be improved with
the estzblishment of a closer in service office, which is being considered.
Training is two persons per workstation free of charge. Cost of equipment
as demonstrated is $32,882, and is the highest in price of any of the equip-
ment that was surveyed.
The Royal System 7000 is a standalone and incorporates 96K of internal and
working memory. It, too, would required a dedicated circuit to operate well.
One of the features of the Royal System is the programning capability of
the equii•.n.ent and the programming service which is provided free of charge.
This system does not have a glossary (dictionary of commonly misspelled
words) at the present time. The equipment software is updated at no charge
to the customer and does include a records management feature which is free
• of charge. Training is two persons per workstation at no additional cost.
The training period is three one -half -day sessions initially. A later,
-7-
more sophisticated, training session is provided after the user has operated
the equipment for several months and is ready to expand his knowledge base. •
In checking references, the system was rated from good to excellent. Royal
is a subsidiary of the Volkswagen Corporation and is relatively new in word
processing. The cost of the system is estimated at $22,000.
Lexitron is the easiest of the word processing systems to operate because
most of the commands are internal requiring little in the way of menu or
keyboard responses. A typist could use the system after a few hours of
training, although a training program is provided. Lexitron will train
one operator per work station free of charge with any additional training
at S100 per person. Their latest system upgrade is called an Informa
option and makes Lexitron as sophisticated as the NBI. One of the fea-
tures that is especially good is a fail -safe erase and delete function
which prevents the inadvertent removal of text from memory. •
Lexitron systems are programmable and will print in 9, 10, 12 and 15 pitch.
This is one more print size than is offered by other vendors. It is the
only system that does not require a dedicated circuit and is ready to go
upon plug in. With the new Informa package, memory ranges from 96K to
393K.
Lexitron would be willing to provide two software packages for the price
of one and additionally, would be willing to install equipment in November
if purchase were to occur in January. This would, in effect, provide a
month of service free of charge. Delivery time is the quickest of any
of the vendors surveyed and can be accomplished within 5 days.
All references that were checked, including those who had some of the first •
equipment, rated the system as excellent with infrequent service calls.
Cost of this equipment with the Informa package is approximately 522,415.
Lexitron is a division of the Raytheon Corporation.
In evaluating all word processing equipment, it was found that all keyboards
operate silently. There is no impact noise as is produced by the standard
office typewriter. The printer, in producing hard copy, generates consider-
able noise which can be likened to the mag card as it plays through a
docu:,ent, All vendors either manufacture or have available a sound cover
for noise attenuation. It is recommended, due to the proximity of work
stations in the present office configuration, that a sound cover be obtained.
The cost for this accoustical hood ranges in price from approximately $350
for scrre systems to $500 in others and would be worth the investment.
The need for word processing is recognized within the division itself.
There is a general feeling of looking forward to and acceptance of word
• processing equipment among the clerical staff. Part of this feeling was
ge^.erated through the research into the various systems as well as the
demonstrations. It has been shown through the demonstrations that there
is little to fear from a learning standpoint. While peak proficiency will
probably not occur for several months after installation, word processing
will most likely expand the clerical staff's productivity without under-
mining rrorale. Furthermore, in the long - range considerations, word proces-
sing will reduce the need for additional clerical personnel because of the
tiro savings which will be of benefit to the City. This reduction of per-
sonnel will provide substantial savings, not only in salary, but in the
associated casts as well.
The City has a Purchasing Ordinance which requires a formal bid procedure
• for any purchase in excess of SSCCO. I would request that the City Council
waive the formal bid procedure and authorize staff to utilize the open
market to negotiate with selected vendors in for^alating an a;re ^rent for
I a f
-9-
equipment. For auditing purposes, complete submittal paperwork will be •
preserved.
This report is an overview of the word processing survey. The decision
matrix will be helpful in making comparisons of the various systems.
Please advise me of any questions you may have regarding this assessment.
J:
•
•
J
0
"N -4
sc
;;/A
1250;x
C..._
Del ...
bre
Y hr.
. Its
ra
l r,,
I I,-
A b.
To
V,-
Yes
Tee
A
.T.,
Yes
yes
Yt"l.ill
A.a.
Ass.
IA..
I
A.,.
IA,,i.
-.1.
Ass.
4mi1
Ise cfft%vh
St.
Yo
Tee
yes
Us
yes
Yes
lXb,l Ss,x%
.lism
11. pabl•!t,
( -
T..
T«
yes
yes
yes
T..
yes
Yes
I
Yes
Is.
yes
cNeled
Tea
Yes
IT..
Yea
Yes
yes
IT..
Yes
.+.Yo.
Yes
IT..
Yes
D
I it
feiY
Ness
WAI-1.
Tral-
;;.;:2
2
IT
NN. 1,
yes
Is.
r.
Yes
ly..
Yes
IT.
yes
Azttl'.11�
Ie
NN
1!:.
Yes
IN.
. e Ter..,
N.
1.
11
1.
IT..
I Test
" :�M.d i:smlrl oP
S'.
Yes
yes
.. ly
ITT-
Yes
I
I
J..'ift.1 utnist PP
a.
ree
Free
F's
F-A,
Is.
Tee
tl9N,ily'.
'fee
T.
T.
... I'l .s.
.%
i %—
_% WN
I
-
eaDe
:u4.
J
-
i5"s
.A
L/➢
N
I.An
Wt I
bl- I
�fb
I s.A
A
s.
N.
se
71.
T1.
Yes
L
De
yes IN.
Ille
Fe
2.
T..
% lys
Vs.
.. It..
IT.,
yes
TNbl- of C.I.I..
x
Nt
N.
n—e
y me
Yes
No IT'.
Yes
1s'J's
.,hj
lt.
We. I./m
I.,—
L1.14
411W
o.t.,
W11 •_,_l (Call
r4
—
4_4
"Ir
".. I
�",.
1:d
_1
U,d
L.zl
F1
Us, IN.
Easl
-11,
Aa bi
lor
T11
;1.
T-
71-
1. ,.A
r1l.
lll.:ltli
k"
'A
Its:
It!.
. %t.
sc
SYSTEM OPTIONS
Ll
Records Processing
$485
$4.85
Statistical Math
2,425
9.70
Full Communications
•
NBI PRICING AND CONFIGURATION FOR
Forms Creation
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9.70
CP/M (Computer Capability)
595
Purchase
Monthly
Price
Maintenance,
OASys 8, Model 1, SS/DD Disk Drive
$12,028
$97.00
4 Ports, 2MB (800 pages)
System 30005 Workstation
7,663
39.77
SS/DD Disk Drive
OASys Model 11 Workstation
4,074
32.01
Diablo 35 CPS
4,171
33.95
Proportional Printer
Dual Tray Sheet Feeder
2,200
20.00
TOTAL
$30,136
$222.73
SYSTEM OPTIONS
Ll
Records Processing
$485
$4.85
Statistical Math
2,425
9.70
Full Communications
3,880
43.65
Forms Creation
2,425
9.70
CP/M (Computer Capability)
595
9.70
The above prices are based on the present GSA contract and are subject to change
on October 11 1982.
A five (51Y) percent prompt pay discount will be applied if the system is paid for
within twenty (20) days from receipt of the invoice or system, whichever is later.
There are no charges for transportation and installation.
0
•
•
SPECIFICATIONS NBI SYSTEM 8 ICU
System Qr6iteeture
/Rigid O'ok stoml e \
-Mod I - 2 million elunclee
>Iw 2 - a million erlaraler
Mal 3 - 10 million glunere
n 3000 comotiWe nom
rater arrange noPPr
(/Printer Peru
6 wOt2 st.tf.
1 pelota"
..time. oft
uOrk Stations
n 3000 with OAS,, Interface
t Slodel II Work Station
ons Ports
m quality with OAS" Interface
speed draft quality
Features
accord
Aulomn tic Cnrringe return
Automnbe mean:
A.I...,,C eenlennq
Singte e1111r c paranphing
Aulomnto, undmt.
Block aver<tr1.e
klunrlcvrl •oiler A subscripts
Aul -auc footnote Conrml
Aubmatin outline format
A.Initmtla parnRrr,h num0ering
diem.... gar
238 1!1,rreter lypim, line
Aulmm,bc :, Gmaum
IleMrn. trnikrs hPnge moth"t
Aullo, ton I gplmnoti.n pass
nccens.l log
Leh flub
OW
C all al )
fill, 1-1Ib1
//
`- 'hulnl,lnt lr wll'sw /orpbm emlrni
Dumm�rnl Cm11ro1 ON Filial
I lrltrl. "', rlgl., fonnm"
klna n 32 .l, 4I111101IM
M-1, 1,1,10 donrm,ma total
Da.nimy Co
ry
A.M.-
1.-dddr
rats by:
11.111,
kcal cool ,cocci,
A r.11LUlr JUk rpnea -__.
/U_.....I Pm,aul aem,ry "t
(_U1s nln w'k,r6 lm,
111 In y I!nlr hnrklp� . .
1�1
S.A.
smsi rag - fornad A Oeekwad
scrolling - left Aright
Sar,roll
ah a any page
Search he text
Unlimited in ertisu
Delete - eharadhr, word• line, block
unlimited text movement
BWek text Capri,
Text highlighting
Sewh A RePhee
Mutual or verified
Exact to matched Care
Tabular Raidon
Delete oelumn
Move columns
Automatic adjust
Auldri repaginetim
Long Document with`
550 page document site
Auto document break
Document merge
Special Applications
Automatic letter writing
�araRrnph selection'
Aulomah,,Clalne fm'mnt \
Aulamn ,, Minx aeration
Automatic table of contents )
Prin ia,
Background print
q ; R mote PH.U.,tiomrols
4 -.,,y queue r
pinv queue for nark station
airplay total Print queue
Mott available printer COMMON
Right justificntlnn
Multiple bitch
Stoma sheet or Mmtinuros
Print wheel mrmmY
Mull' -fnnl printinR
Nigh Priority Killing
Format Contrnh
Page irng,h
Linn., ,ac....
Left mnll.n
Ton margin
Pn ngrnnh,ndrin
Chrneter spacing
amt length
Text hmdtb
Pamaroph ,,acing
Ju1Ofo,11.1
Propnrimnnl ;nmmoq
Aulonowe multi-,m.non
Arth re
Prom ICU
Prom syslem 3000
MWti- criteri<
by Directory
by Author
by Document
by ".144 he revved
Floppy diskette lock
hiltm
slaMgod
SS Characters per second
10, 12 or 15 pitch
ISa maximum paper C ... Ci:y
13.3" maximum writing line
Bldirational
Printar Options
Proportional spacing
60 Chanel." per xC.d
10, 12, goal PS
Wide Document Printer
31 Character, pa rto.ad
Sir maximum Paper Capaei:y
33.0 maximum writing lice
Dual Ileaded Prk:er
Dwl typeface print
IS Characters per accord
11e maximum p.car eapeeity
11.2 "maximum ruing line
Usle Printer (I per ICU)
300 line. per minor. upper C...
260 upper and Iowa, race
UMernore
ISO Chancre furl
Meet Feeder option
Optical Character Reader
OtAOr oplbru
Into, ICU dopy
Communw.ttona
RUI I'omo-lrPOint
Asynchronous
BhyrMhrMmut
S1.6.1r al Ninth P.ckngo
Fqumion l yping Paekn„c
�nrrrNS Preoc.mng
R;rms Tra•e•<iul
Physical Characteristics
than liyehl �Nrlh Wldtb WeieM
ICU
29150"
25.0'
21.011"
110.0 hu
Ilo:rl U' a wk Stnrnn
la.tn"
22.01
25.0u'
69.0 lot.
It1n'1rv: Pe ter
T.II'
133'
23.6:"
28.0 Ib,
Proprc,lmlal PI 1 r
13,0
16.01
26.uu'
22.01r,.
Rule nueumem Prndn
7.11-
11.5"
161SW1
22.011..
hunt I-aced Pnnirl
7.111,
11.5'
30.50"
40.1. 1•n.
I, I P11 :1
39.
24.3"
SPECIFICATION NRI OASys 30005 WORKSTATION
Features
Record
Automatic carriage return
Au: mane indent
Aulnmilic centering
Sin;le Nevatmke peregr.Phil
Automalie orbital
Sl9 i4arecla typing tine
go numbers
pass
Penal leader
Aulomatw '+'idea /eepnon control
Uectil t Control and old,
Autanouc alphabetized directory
Bucu.menl dereriplim
Tvpgl fr and EOr ill
ale
Time S date i'l lag
Aenllnblc dick space
It, pas and aecunly
Boris mend pnaawom aecurily
Printable dirceturiea
Rev aim
Scraping- forward S handball
Selo Ming- Iefl.1 right
Page "roll
Seal to any page
Search to teat
Seureh to command
UnRnn lrd I ,o tl my
petal rvnv -rM1n rncl tar, word, tine. Mal
Unh-1. a1 tart n cat
T, uan
r'1hl ' r l
r
S I '. b 11 ii
tlo r veni
OI rd
IP "l
C
ml case
Tab '
Drill It ton
anima r Inmm
M"..
An' • mild,
A Vt n',', „,lallr rfpnyl hill inn
Staaaial Appfirnliau
Attemil letter venting
Automatic until” format
Automatic index creation
Automatic lahm of contents
Paragraph Assembly m screen
Permit mntrola
Page length
Teat lergth
Line epaeing
Top margin
Left berg,,
Line engirt
Paragraph Intent
Cal lcr spacing
Proportional spacing
Juetifleotion
Pmetraph spacing
Automatic multi - column
Printing
Typex'nter made
Prim by character
Print by line
Single shl or emiti alto.,
Eigl t Wnmert anal all
1`1111 -heel memory
Multi -font inners,
Right lush LeabaP
High priarily printing
Reekgrmmd print
Interchangeable fonts
Optional Features
SbAktirnVall Package
Columns u rows a fired
Alt, mbtrael, mist tipl y, divide
Sum and means
Percentage dn'tnbulim
Ace,na late memory
Pquelim Package
14 Levcls dnnlnyed
Moth rynnMla m.ptoyed
Crere y -mhal, •L�p14a111
Ihenrdv 1`nrmv:im{
Solt
Allel mld nau r b bt,obb
undid, f.e1ds 'g
awct
larin
Un rrdenn
UOl on dcd Ldd vie
Physical Characteristics
of
oe a rex
in gal lib
70 variable Nme6 each with a
maximum of 99 zubfielda
Up to 23 characters Cer veritable
Up to 21q character line
Up to 159 linen per farm
flat abLsF maxim ur rind arse value
Parma Print
Precise printer ilign^ent
Vertical spacing to 1148th of
an Inch
Recita l apaeing to 1/110th
of an then
Character spacing 10, 17 and 15
pitch
Repemed variable,
Cl teat h ln;l'g
Reference numhe; -.ay be printed
on the form
Selected forms print by reference
number
Background print
Stored NeyatroNes
Save and recall any sa,uen,e of
keyatzokea A e.-,and,
Easy to creole. eept•..re
Stored Key'IWk,l; Repeating
Stored IloyslroAe Chairing
Can he used with ether software
options
Automatic footnote renumbering
Aaynrloonaln Comminnicatiorw
NRI camDO eb,bly
ASCII lermmal
Sortware aol,cl,d tae ds
B.uA :round l
Auto receive l „ l
Ifl,nobn,nna, Color, mienlir-
97R0AG90
NUI m Rpl, compute:
word proeccors, or IB`d OS
6/6670
EUCUIC ar ASCII
Up le'bW ions
Tillao,hlC
Rnergru unl rperatil
Nul f! Ill
75 ^0" 9S.0 11.11,
21A1' 789 Ina.
74.01" 17.0 IDs.
74.., 7'.4 „
1
40
•
•
Unit
Ilcgd`I
101105 to "tale Lan
14.50'
27.0'
S$ 51 1'h Nee
7.11"
11.5"
40 P Pro r!rr
•^
13.00"
16.0"
15 1,
tc 110
of
oe a rex
in gal lib
70 variable Nme6 each with a
maximum of 99 zubfielda
Up to 23 characters Cer veritable
Up to 21q character line
Up to 159 linen per farm
flat abLsF maxim ur rind arse value
Parma Print
Precise printer ilign^ent
Vertical spacing to 1148th of
an Inch
Recita l apaeing to 1/110th
of an then
Character spacing 10, 17 and 15
pitch
Repemed variable,
Cl teat h ln;l'g
Reference numhe; -.ay be printed
on the form
Selected forms print by reference
number
Background print
Stored NeyatroNes
Save and recall any sa,uen,e of
keyatzokea A e.-,and,
Easy to creole. eept•..re
Stored Key'IWk,l; Repeating
Stored IloyslroAe Chairing
Can he used with ether software
options
Automatic footnote renumbering
Aaynrloonaln Comminnicatiorw
NRI camDO eb,bly
ASCII lermmal
Sortware aol,cl,d tae ds
B.uA :round l
Auto receive l „ l
Ifl,nobn,nna, Color, mienlir-
97R0AG90
NUI m Rpl, compute:
word proeccors, or IB`d OS
6/6670
EUCUIC ar ASCII
Up le'bW ions
Tillao,hlC
Rnergru unl rperatil
Nul f! Ill
75 ^0" 9S.0 11.11,
21A1' 789 Ina.
74.01" 17.0 IDs.
74.., 7'.4 „
1
40
•
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
April 28, 1982
TO: Jack Lam, Director
Conanunity DevelopmeXquestrfiaAn"
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
SUBJECT: Abandonment of the
Easement for Tract 9440
Jkv)e a
I have notified the persons responsible for submitting the petition regarding
the abandonment of the equestrian easement that the matter will not be
scheduled until June 2nd. In the meantime, please prepare whatever staff
report or other information as necessary to handle the item.
Thanks for your cooperation.
LMW:baa (4- 29 -82)
4CA110,,L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
.xy., Phillip D. Schl..e Arthur H. Bridge Jon D. Milid,
2 Lmo C. Frost Michael A. Palumbo
U; >
19]]
April 28, 1982
Mrs. Don Husband
10039 Coca Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701
Dear Mrs. Husband:
Thank you for your recent petition regarding the abandonment of the eques-
trian easement for your tract. Since the abandonment would be a major
policy issue, I have scheduled it for the June 2, 1982 meeting of the r.ity
council. The council meets at 7:30 p.m. in the Lion's Park Community Center,
9161 Base Line Road.
I apologize for the rather long delay until the item is scheduled. However,
the city council has a number extremely complicated items scheduled for the
May 19th city council meeting. We anticipate that meeting to be very long,
and we do not wish to inconvenience you or other concerned citizens by having
you wait through several lengthy council items of business.
Again, thank you very much for your petition. It will be forwarded to the
council immediately for review and will be scheduled for public hearing at
the June 2nd council meeting. In the meantime if you do have questions,
please feel free to contact me.
Si ncer�ely_� //
Laur""' Wes_
Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
LMW:baa (4- 29 -82)
cc: City Council
Mrs. Sidney Crabtree
POST OFFICE BOX 807 • RANCHOCCCAM ONGA,CAI.IFORYIA91730 0 (714)989 -1851
G� y
City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseling Road
Rancho Cuca ^_on Pa, Ce 91701
I E 9 E I V E 0
CITY OF RANCNO CUCAVONCA
ADMINISTRATION
April 27, 1982 APR 271M
7a_�8191�Itt11ti1 f2„9�l�B
Petition to Abandon the Equestrian Easenent for Tract 9440
The ho,+.eo:aners of Tract 9440, City of Rancho Cucaronza, whose sig-
natures anrear on the attached letter, hereby retitlon The City
Council of Rancho Cueamongs to anrrove the abandonrent of the 20
Equestrian °err ents of Tract 0440. This retition is filed purs-
uant to the Declaration of Restrictions for Tract 9440 filed with
the County of San Bernardino in Book 9969, Faze 1249.
Tr Is recuest is made heeeuse of the following facts$
1. Horeowners of Tract 9440 are not qer -fitted to maintain
hors-s on their rronerty nursvant to the above mentioned
covenants.
2. The casements are used by Individuals on motorcycles as a
means of access to the flood control b--sin which borders
the south side of Tract 9440. This is a constant problem,
which creates a General nuisance often reeulring the assist-
ance of law enforcement.
3• The ease -en.t is used for Recess to the flood control basin
by individuals wishing to dune trash. There have been
occasions when reorle have been observed to brine pickup
trucks loaded with trash down the easement and exit erpiy.
4. Since the ho;teowners cannot use the easement for any pur-
-," there is no incentive to maintain the easement weed
free, and it therefore beceres a nuisance in and of Itself.
5. The e^senent provides, indisorl -inote access to the rear
of the he --s bordering the - ase ^ent. This sneers creates
a high likelihood of burglary and theft to those homes.
The Neimhborhnod latch Fromram cannot actively work ,TIth
this eccess beo•4use It is to the rear of the hones.
Er.closAd -ith this -- tirion rl— s•e find the signatures of the home -
0%rn -rs of Trl�ct 914910, as trell Rs s man and rhotozrarhs.
Contacts
P.rs. Don Husband
1C034 Coca ,Ave.
Alto L--a, Ca 91701
71U -980 -3925
�t
Ira. Sidney Crabtree
10009 Coca Ave.
Alta L ^,ma, Ca 91701
714- 980 -2412
March 7, 1962
Flannlr.g Division
Corrur.ity Developrtent Depart -ent
City of R�ncno Cucaronga, CA
Dt"ar Sirs
The urd =rsigned owners of lots nu *tiered 1 -34 and 39 -43
Tract 0440, In the City of Rancho Cucarongs, he.raby petition
for the removal of the 20 foot Snuestrisn Ease- ent'whlch
bord-rs the, South of each of these nurbered lots. 1
Since the owners of all lots in Tract 0440 are prohibited
fror raintaining h^r-es on their rrorerty, tdls Equestrian
Easement is not nec"essery to the en Joynent of that property.
We therefore request that the F1arr.ing Division take what-
ever sters are necessary to rrnove this Equestrian Easement.
P'
Thank you .for y ^ur asrIstancp in tr,is ratter. —
Tract Furber 9440.0
Lot Fu ^ber i _ M �i�4 wit, Date
'1'4'L"4 D?cr. .,.3 7/6z
Lot, Yu-bar 2 (fic;;_,.�...` SJ� I� -o.,h� Date 3
n! ^
Lot Diu -ber 3 Date 317 6�-
Date 3 0 7r
Lot • .. *�,r h _ivmL�E1 Date 379,2J
Date 7 JZ
f,ot biu� tier 5f��x��,av,
Lot Nurber 6
r
Date -1/7 fi
Date %z
Date. L
Date Z
`r 4 AW
.11.0. -. �.Y�
Lot N"u ber
Lot N "-brr
Lot Nu-ber
\' Lot hurter
k Lot Fumb -r 11
k Lot ?'u -b °r 12
Lot :: ;,-'' ^er 13 i
Lot V' I E
La« .'v-h -r 1 a
Date 7 bZ,
DRte Z
Date
Date
Date J % A&
Date .3 -7 ' 9z
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
v. to
Date y -7 -,V-
Date 4--1 -`fit
Dete
Date %_ J —yi
D:a te,
Date
.i
i
X Lot Nu-ber 16
Date
Date
Lot \u -bPr 1
U Date
Date 3 S
Lot ::u ^ber 19 - Date
Date,
S- L
V
Lot `7uxbPr
Date
Lot iiurber 20 \ Date
Date
X T -..t !-u..b -r 91
Date
Date. _
D ^tP
D ^tP
Date
Date.
Lot Pu�ber 25 Dote 9J i-a Z
Date 3Qk t Z
Lot Nuzber 26
Dgte Q 'z S Z
Date
Lot Number 27
Date
Date
Lot r'u ^ber 26
Date
Date
Lot P'ur ber
1 Date — /`8 r7
Dnte
Lot au: bar 31 / /%'
Data
Lot plu -b =r 3D
« Data 3.31-1Z
F's te
Lot hu�b'r
to
Date —erg
Lot au -b -r 33
Date
- Dete,
Lot :dur.ber 34
Date
Date,
Lot .1;u -ber 39
�Cr� Date
D to y--
Lot Nu -ber 40� rn�O,�atiL Date
Date
Lot 2!u -ber 41 w Date Z-
DAte 3 sal a
Lot Number 42
Dgte
Date
I Lot Number 411 Date
Date
Lot Nu7,ber 49 2 Date
Date 3 Z-
Lot Yu -ber 45 yJ-;hv he ?� /i�'W✓.°�ate 4Z-31125;'-
A
s 71 32 �33 .11w.n 39 n37 38
s 35 36 ¢ R
:T w3AI4 r1 onNt -4 -Y� -ere :,� J �p�nrtARP�1VC'i A�
39,,�r,:
3o F 29 z7 • zs\'q';�
�, ar 25 f is 40 5
Ql
24 5nrm
N:a 13 �� n�.� / 16 (1 .Ff •`jar
•J•i!i.l \� (\ y'� lli"(I�.11:41- .R \:I= M,TT9__II � � (� Qi
f ...Ti Rf �I -1w•- df- 0- 1A-- Ei'•.i_i. \�li i� I Y
I i e`
21 l *, ,.•
to 19 20
Y':' .a Win.,• " -=14�x Rr-- ua_ {_ ...: r: .5 �,j". N' /��•�.'�i:p+ •�(�j
ter. +• StKE1��4A
` 9 d Sj 7 6� 9
:o wou onn Rw :. • a_ riw it;n�
f
9
t
f
�K.
aRF1 ] R S SIRii'
TRACT
N Oe
9440
mmiMu MINERS
MTIR
IN THI CIIN Of
RANCHO
COCANCNCA
RIM: A SMJVIS10N 6 A SC TIM W
1NE NRRMIFSi
WVITA 6 YCTIM M. I. IN..
R.".. 5,B.N. [N m COHII V W
UItIJAMINO. S1AP OC CALIF MIA.
s 71 32 �33 .11w.n 39 n37 38
s 35 36 ¢ R
:T w3AI4 r1 onNt -4 -Y� -ere :,� J �p�nrtARP�1VC'i A�
39,,�r,:
3o F 29 z7 • zs\'q';�
�, ar 25 f is 40 5
Ql
24 5nrm
N:a 13 �� n�.� / 16 (1 .Ff •`jar
•J•i!i.l \� (\ y'� lli"(I�.11:41- .R \:I= M,TT9__II � � (� Qi
f ...Ti Rf �I -1w•- df- 0- 1A-- Ei'•.i_i. \�li i� I Y
I i e`
21 l *, ,.•
to 19 20
Y':' .a Win.,• " -=14�x Rr-- ua_ {_ ...: r: .5 �,j". N' /��•�.'�i:p+ •�(�j
ter. +• StKE1��4A
` 9 d Sj 7 6� 9
:o wou onn Rw :. • a_ riw it;n�
f
9
t
f
�K.
C0.s.e t,,.ert} Of'T CdC O
�oasev,^Ay+ OJ�4 O-rrmesa
C e
i
Easavwan$ art i1et*,^oa
city Cou'cll
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Saseling Road
Rancho Cuca -onga, Ca 91701
April 27, 1982
I E C E I V E 0
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAIIONGA
ADMINISTRATION
APR 271982
�8�>tIW1t,lg
Frtitlon to Abandon the Equestrian Easer.ent for Tract 9440
The ho- eowners of Tract 941:0, City of Rancho Cucamonga, whrse sig-
retvr-s arrear on the attached letter, hereby retlticn The . ^.Sty
Courcil of Raroho Cucamonga to Approve the abandnn-ent of the 20 '
ElveFtrtar 3ssents of Tract o1 +40. This retitien is filed rurs-
ua.rt to the Declaration of Restrictions for Tract 9440 filed with
the CcUnty of San Bernardino in Book 9569, -ace 1249.
T is rP ^vest is -ade >,eeause of the following facts:
1. roreowners of Tract 9440 are not pPrrltted to TRIntain
hors =,s on their rrorerty rursvant to the above rentioned
covenants.
2. The case -tints are used by Individuals on motorcycles as A
reans of access to the flood control b --sin ,,hich borders
the south side of Tract 9440. This is a constant problem,
which crates a general nuisance often reouirtng the assist-
ance of law enforcement.
3. The ease -ent is used for access to the flood control basin
by irdivlduals wishing to du -p trash. There have been
recaslons Then reorle hnv- been observed to bring rlckuo
trunks loaded with trash down the Paserent and exit a -pty.
4. Since the hnreo•.uners cannot use the easement for sry pur-
^ P there is no incentive to raintain the easement weed
free, And It therefore becores A nuisance In srd of itself.
5. The easement provides$ lndiscririnste access to the rear
Of the hr ^as bordering the ease -tint. This access creates
a hivh l.tklthood of burglery end theft to those gores.
The `'Pi�hbnrhnod latch rrograr cannot actively work with
this access because it is to the rear of the horns.
Er.closad -it., t''.ts '-tltlor rl =ase fird the signatures of the home -
ovm�rs Of T`gt 11.40, ^s pall as a rar and rhotocra�hs.
Contact:
I,.rs. Don Husband
10039 Coca Ave.
Alta Loa, Ca 91701
714 - 980 -3925
5
Yrs. Sidney Crabtree
10009 Coca Ave.
Alta Loma, Ca 91701
714 -980 -2412
Ibq
F grch ?, 1982
`^j
Flarrlr,g Division
Cnr -urity DPve�o*,TPrt DepArt ^ent
City of Harcho Cuca'-^nea, CA
DP ?r Sirs
-.
The 1 ;,d- rslcned n;,m;Prs ^.f lots rC ^"Pred 1 -34 and 3q_45
Tract 0440, ir. the City of gar.chc Cuca-orna, hereby
retition
for the rer —ml ^f the 20 fnnt E ^sP ^ert
^t.lch
b -rd,rS the j ^.•'t'r, of e`:Ch'. of t. ^PsP. nu-bPr P,d lots,
SL ne *' ^.e anprs -f all lnts Sr Tr :lot p440, are
-rohib ?.tad
fr— .h. ^rs =s on t'elr rr- p-rty, t is
Equeetrten
ase -Prt is rot recess -ry to the end ^•, °art ,f that
nr�rPrty.
Je t'r.PreF ^.re request t ^at the ;len °Src Divislon
take wnRt-
evPr rte-s =re recessar? to r—ove t:.ts Equ Pstri
?n '�s— ert.
Thark .. ^u f -r : —'Jr asslatarne in t. is
'
Tract 9 44
Let � n ^-bprtier 1 1 4 y�_ Cate
.
a
Jr D9te.
L7/J4
a..J l^K
1
Lot Fu ^her 2 ,,. �!__ {' 5-,4L Date
� Date
3 /� /az
3 gz
`
Lot iii -ber 3 Date
L Da'.P
,9
d
i .
Lot Nu -tier 4 � t D,te
ti/AS/.f�.�4c� � Date
7
_•
•��
Lnt ! �, °rpr 5 - 11ALE1 ^t ,��5�- '-DUtP
J%
(1._`7
Data
i
du 11
7
Lot 6 Date
Z
ud.
etiy
i%o
`^j
i
Lot Gurber
Lot Yu -ber
Lot Yu -tor
1� L ^t. Iurber
x Lot Fu?.ber 11
Date 7 SL
Date ?-
Date
Date. Rz
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
Date
k Lot
Nur`-r
12
Date.
Date
Lot
Dumber
1)
Date
4 -7_1"2
Date
4 -"1-k1
Lot
Du +ber
14
Date
-8z
Date
'Y, 7— 2 2—
Lot
Fu -ber
15
Date
Date
i.
C.^
X Lot Tumber 16
Date
Date
Lot N'u -ber 1, Date SIFT /'03
Date, O
Lot TEL' ^bP.r lA Dete `
Dete S-
Lot
Lot Tau -ber 20
Dote
Date
X Lot Ku-ber 91 D9te
i Date
Lot T :u ^ber 22 Date
+ Dnte
Lot Bu *,Pr 93 Date
Dnte
Lot Dare
v U Date
�f
4l 3 (t �2-
if. Lot ru•ber 7S Date
=.i Date 3 Y
V. 171
Lot Nu -ber 26 '`'u( /Lt/L`.
Lot Au,ber 27
Di4te 2 Z
Date
Date
Date
Date �lj -b-
Date
Lot Yu -ber3AL. At .Y/J1(O"ae Date 3 -J /-$�
Date
Lot Dur'-r 30 t ate
Date
Lot u ^b =r 3m i / . DAte ,3 ;Z,
Lot Nu, bo.r 3G� (,��, Date /�'z✓�-
.a OUT— DA tP. Y" )-
..� 173 r>
Date
Lot r'unbrr yyttn�te
Date.
Lot Cu,ber 33
Date
Date
Lot ;'u-c�r ?4
Date
Date
Lot Nu, bo.r 3G� (,��, Date /�'z✓�-
.a OUT— DA tP. Y" )-
..� 173 r>
Lot Nu -ber 40LIA4 nAL� Date
4ie Dat e
Lot Nu ^bar 41 Dete
DRLP. aJ4
_ Lot Nu ^ber 42 Dgte
Date
Lot Number 41 Date oZ
Date
Lot xu-bar 49 Dste
Date 1 t
Lot Yu—bPr 45
j ate y y yi
e;
-,Jt-
_v,S�
1,y
�7 is
�i
v. -
TRACT N0. 9440 u�,Awmm�
IN THE CI IT Of RANCHO CO[AHCNGA
ETIK A SMTYISIM OF A "TIM Of OR NORTN•EST OUAOER OF SECTION M. T. IN..
R t•.. S.O.N IN HE CCAAtT OF W OEWMINC. SIAM OF CALIFWIIA
7.
71 32 33 34 w.x ; 30
3s 3s Tj q \+
30 1 1 26 27 26
9 29
• I y
3JI-A1SL I�y�1.L�.•
MC , ••Nb 14 ...x, Is AI dl
�a
13 s rte- ±{awj IB
12 17
10 is
ITT, ��1ntu• .� 11f11'.6J>� -.
;j ❑ � .q . ,y 18 ; dJ �
5
I cry
M4 w
• SiRFT � N
39
2 2S
al
24 I
1
23
43
1
44 o+✓
f
a5 ;!4
s 3
5 s� e 7 s s q
� C � � . a 's 1 H '•1�� w 1
s m...Fw - • � n� inn n �.. - -. i
to
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve the purchase of the
Work Processing equipment by NBI. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none.
7. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS.
Mr. Schlosser announced that he would not be at the August 18th meeting since
he would be out of town.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn. Motion carried
unanimously to adjourn to August 9th at 7:00 p.m. in the Lion's Park Community
Center for a special meeting. Meeting adjourned at 12:30 a.m.
Respectfffuulllly(� submitted,
Beverly Aiithelet
Deputy City Clerk
, ant you may or may not accurately reflect the mood of the
meeting. He felt that part of the role of the Chairperson would be to attend the
Council meetings and that through other mechanisms which will be discussed later
that more councilmembers will be attending the CAC meetings. He felt that was
sufficient.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser that a spokesman from the Commission be appointed to
communicate with each city council member. No vote was taken, but was the con -
census of the Council to include this as a function of the Chairperson.
3. Appoint City Council Delegate to Advisory Commission: Mr. Frost suggested
that instead of appointing a delegate that individual councilmembers try to make
it to more of the CAC meetings. Council concurred.
4. Advisory Commission Exposure to Community: Council concurred with the recom-
mendation that the Commission's role and activities be more publicized in order to
encourage citizen participation and create a general awareness of the importance
of the Commission.
5. Chamber of Commerce Exposure: Council concurred that the Chamber of Commerce
needed to become more cognizant of Commission activities and their role in the
community.
6. Broaden Scope of Commission Activities: Council concurred that this item should
be turned back to the CAC for them to come up with a list of items they wanted to
have turned over to them.
7. Delegate(s) to City Council: Council concurred that the Chairman would act as
the delegate and spokesman to the City Council.
Council also discussed the following items listed on Mr. Robinson's memo dated
July 30, 1981 to the City Council and included in the agenda packet:
A. Attendance Policy: Consensus of council was that council would keep a closer
eye on the attendance, but to continue present policy to let the Commission police
themselves.
B. Variation of Meeting Policy: Council concurred to leave this as it is currently,
meeting the fourth Thursday of each month with the exception of summer recess.
C. Expansion of Advisory Commission Role: Council skipped to come back later.
D. Term of Office: Council directed staff to come back with recommendation on how
to effect two year terms and to stagger them.
E. Council Committee to Study Advisory Commission Role: Council concurred that
it was not necessary to appoint a committee since Council was actually doing the
process at this meeting.
C. Expansion of the Role of Advisory Commission: Council concurred that item C
would not have to be in the ordinance, They felt that if Council desired to for-
ward an item to the Commission for discussion, then they would. They did not feel
the CAC should handle the Parks and Trails functions. There would be no formal
change in the role of the Advisory Commission.
5A. CONSIDERATION FOR FORMATION OF A PARKS AND TRAILS COMMISSION.
After much discussion and several attempts at formulating a motion, the follow-
ing motion was made and approved:
Motion: :Moved by Dahl, seconded by Frost to request staff to prepare a document
for the creation of a Parks Advisory Commission to come back on September 1, 1982.
Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
rotating chairman. Presently the Advisory Commission has a rotating chairperson.
savor Mikels stated that regarding exposure of the Advisory Commission, Council
could give them more exposure through the Grapevine.
Councilman Schlosser stated that on item No. 2, Encourage Communication, that
perhaps the Advisory Commission could have a spokesman. He stated that he had
never been lobbied by any member of the CAC. Perhaps they could have a s,ember
delegated to contact the council to keep the council informed. Also council
could communicate back through this person. He said this was just a suggestion
to consider.
Mayor Mikels suggested that perhaps we could schedule a joint meeting to go over
items of restructuring of the CAL before council makes a final action.
Mayor Mikels stated that perhaps there has been a lack of communication from the
Advisory Commission because they feel they don't have enough of a stake in the
final decision- making process.
Mr. Buquet pointed out that council had been lobbied in the past by the CAC.
For example on the fireworks issue, the CAC did a Resolution and brought it to the
Council stating they were opposed to it and why. Also, they made input on the
General Plan hearings and the Victoria Plan hearings.
Mr. Dahl stated that there should be a response to the CAC when they come forth
with a Resolution or position to council. Especially when Council mades a decision
contrary to the position of the CAC. In the future, a response should be made back
to the CAC as to the reasons why council voted the way they did. This should help
open up communications.
Mr. Schlosser asked why the CAC couldn't handle the Parks and Trails items. Mr.
Dahl expressed it would be too large a group to handle such technical items. Mr.
Schlosser asked if a subcommittee couldn't be formed on a rotation basis. Mr. Dahl
responded that this position would require growing into such as a Planning Commission
or Council position.
Mayor Mikels stated the purpose of forming the CAC was to form three separate
committees and to form them into one. He felt there might be internal problems as
to where park development monies would be spent and where park acquisition monies
would be spent. A Commission with no identification to a particular community with-
in the city would have an easier time of making independent decisions from their own
local community since they would not have a commitment to their community, but would
consider the community as a whole.
Buquet stated that in looking at restructuring, we should be looking at mrmbers.
Conclusions by Council were:
1. Formalize the Structure: To mandate by ordinance the appointment of a chairman
for the CAC from its members for a period of one year.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to direct staff to make the change in
Ordinance No. 87 to formally require the appointment of an overall chairman for the
CAC for a term of one year. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
2. Encourage Communication:
Motion: Moved by Dahl that the Council respond to the CAC an any recommendations
from the CAC which Council acts in opposition to. Motion failed for lack of second.
Mr. Dougherty stated that Councilmen are elected officers. As such when they take
a legislative action, you are not required to give any reasons to any person for the
action you take. No action of any other body can force an individual councilperson
to give a reason for the action taken. If you wish to do so, that is within your
individual power.
sor:p concerns as follows:
1. To formalize the structure of the Advisory Commission which would mean to
appoint a chairperson from each of the communities so there would be a
responsibility within each community for an individual to take charge and
organize that portion of the Advisory Commission. Perhaps also a chair-
person be appointed for the entire Commission.
2. Encourage communication between the Advisory Commission members and with
the rest of the community. Members should be encouraged to participate
outside of the Advisory Commission meetings by possibly attending Council
meetings, Planning Commission meetings, and being involved in other
activities in order to become more knowledgeable to improve their input to
the Advisory Commission.
3. Felt it essential that city council appoint a delegate to the Advisory
Commission to attend their meetings and to act as a liaison between the
city council and the advisory commission.
4. Commission also discussed ways in which to get more community involvement
with the Advisory Commission.
5. They encouraged chamber of commerce exposure.
6. Encouraged that the scope of the activities be broadened.
7. Felt it important that the Advisory Commission appoint a delegate to the
city council so someone would be at council meetings and to encourage
the flow of communication.
8. Perhaps establish a more formal attendance policy.
9. Change meeting schedule, perhaps meet every other month or even quarterly
so that agendas could be more concentrated.
10. Perhaps expansion of the role of the Advisory Commission.
11. Change in term of office; perhaps four year term is too long.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments. There being none, the meeting
was closed for further public comm ents.
Councilman Schlosser stated be would like to keep the Advisory Commission, but the
question was how do we keep them busy. One thing he would like to add would be to
have a critique made by the Advisory Commission of the Council. He felt the changes
recommended were excellent and should be incorporated.
Councilman Dahl agreed that the scope of their activates could be broadened, exposure
to the community and chamber, etc. were important. He stated that it seemed that
there was a breakdown in communications between the council and planning commission.
Too often their recommendations are taken lightly. He felt it would be interesting
to see how the other two communities looked at the Etlwanda Specific Plan. He was
opposed to the expansion of the Advisory Commission to combine it with the Parks
and Trails Commission He felt the Parks Commission was a highly technical commission
while the Advisory Commission was a more general organization to give a more general
community input while the Parks and Trails Commission would be more focused.
Mayor Mikels asked if the Advisory Commission had access to the City Council Agendas?
Mr. Robinson stated that they were mailed copies of the agendas. Mayor Mikels stated
that they had access to all items which were to be discussed by Council then and
could initiate discussion on their own if they so desired. Mr. Robinson stated that
what the CAC would desire is to have an increased number of items forwarded to them
fo':mally for considerations.
Mayor Mikels stated that regarding the formalization of the Commission, they could
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
B1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1982 -83 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 IN CONNECTION
WITH LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT #1.
report
Mr. Buquet inquired if this would create any problems in the future. Nr.
Hubbs stated no.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve Resolution No. 82 -146
and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Title of
Resolution No. 82 -146 was read by Mr. Robinson.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED A
PORTION OF 22ND STREET AT CENTER AVENUE AND
ALLEY WAY, BETWEEN 22ND STREET AND 8TH STREET.
5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
5A. CONSIDERATION FOR FORMATION OF A PARKS AND TRAILS COMMISSION. Staff report
by Bill Holley.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comments. There being no response, the
public portion of the meeting was closed.
Councilman Dahl stated that a proposal was before Council with respect to the
formation of a Trails and Parks Advisory Commission. He referred to his memo
of June 24th as to the reasons why he brought this forth.
Mayor Mikels asked for discussion on whether Council concurred in the formation
of such a Commission.
Councilman Frost stated that he felt this was premature at this point before the
redirecting of the Advisory Commission. The issue regarding the Advisory Commission
should be discussed first.
Councilman Buquet expressed concern that Council had discussed bringing
information regarding the Advisory Commission and taking a look at it. He
was concerned that we should look at the CAC first.
Councilman Schlosser stated that the Advisory Commission was looking for items
to handle. He felt the Advisory Commission could do this also and that we
should not be forming another Commission.
Councilman Dahl expressed that he could not accept a fifteen member Commission
for the Trails and Parks, but he moved for a recess before considering the
CAC.
Mayor Mikels called a recess at 9:55 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:15 p.m.
with all members of Council and Staff present.
east and adjacent to Chaffey College. Staff report presented by Jack Lam
Mr. Frost asked if the Chaffey Board of Trustees had made a statement on behalf
of the College. Mr. Lam stated that in the past the college has been reluctant
to take a position, but individuals could comment if they wished.
Mr. Dahl stated that this should go back to the Trails Commission - he wanted
to know the Commission's input regarding the Wilson trail. This doesn't
show on the overall site plan.
Mr. Lam stated that whatever is required on the Wilson trail will be taken care
of. Because Mr. Vairin was on vacation, he could not answer this question
tonight.
Mr. Rempel, Planning Commissioner, stated that the trail cannot be on
the south side of Wilson because the college prohibits it, therefore the
trail will have to be on the north side. The college already has a sidewalk
in.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no comments,
the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Dahl stated that an excellent job had been done mitigating the problems.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No. 82 -145
and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. Mr. Robinson
read the title of Resolution No. 82 -145.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -145
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TENTATIVE
TRACT 11550 HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CEQA AND STATE GUIDELINES.
Mr. Robinson read the title of Ordinance No. 182.
ORDINANCE NO. 182 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 197 -07 FROM A -1 -5 TO R- 1-20,000
AND R -3 FOR APPROXIMATELY 65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, EAST AND ADJACENT
TO CHAFFEY COLLEGE.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to waive further reading of
Ordinance No. 182. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to set second reading for
August 18, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4G. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT. Staff
report presented by Lloyd Hubbs,
Mr. Hubbs stated that the Resolution would be setting the assessments for
1982. Costs per square foot would be 20 cents or $45.00 per lot.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Gomez, city planner, presented the staff report. He stated that at the last
meeting some concern had been expressed by Council regarding the design and type
of architectural materials used. A representative from Lewis Homes was present
to address these issues.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council ams:
*John Melcher, Lewis Homes. Be stated that since there were concerns
expressed regarding what would be the cornerstone of the Terra Vista
project, they had been meeting with Councilmen Frost and Buquet to bear
their concerns. They respectfully request that this item be continued
to the next meeting in order that they could have time to evaluate these
concerns.
There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public
hearing.
Mr. Frost stated that as far as the singular building being proposed, it is
one which would be acceptable and compatible to the city. As far as the site
layout as a whole, this leaves a great deal to be desired.
Mr. Buquet wanted to see a better focal treatment of the building. He also
had concerns with the architectural as far as the texture and material used
on the building. He wanted a better looking, high quality building.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to continue item to August 18 for the
second reading of Ordinance No. 181. Motion carried unanimously.
vc. cavinunmcaia,. waacaonzea ,uvu ruuvnw v
10826 - LESNEY. A change of zone from R -1- 20,000 (single family residential
ii acre lots) to R -2 /PD (two family residential /planned development) and the
development of 27 single family units, 81 patio homes and 202 townhouse units
on 57.7 acres of land, located between Haven Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, approxi-
mately 660' south of Wilson - APN 201 - 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63, 65 and 69.
Staff report by Rick Gomez, City Planner.
Mr. Robinson read the title of Ordinance No. 179.
ORDINANCE NO. 179 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 201- 181 -12, 13, 14, 02, 63, 65, AND
69 LOCATED BETWEEN HAVEN AND HERMOSA AVENUES,
APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON, FROM
R -1- 20,000 TO R -2 /PD.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to waive further reading of Ordin-
ance No. 179. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was:
*The applicant who encouraged final approval of the project.
There being no further public comments, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Buquet to approve Ordinance No. 179. Motion
carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, and Mikels.
NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
arty p . oul. : an auanc nment o'.: e i :em( . would require an
unanimous approval of the homeowners. If the abandonment cannot be achieved
because of lack of unanimous approval Of the homeowners, then the city obviously
cannot take action to cause it to be effected.
Mr. Dahl expressed concern regarding the abandonment because of the precedent
it would set.
Mr. Schlosser stated that he agreed and would oppose the abandonment of the trails
since it was an integral part of the General Plan.
Mr. Frost stated that even if there was a majority opinion among the homeowners,.
the Council still might not approve the abandonment.
Mr. Buquet expressed concern because he had seen the equestrian element squeezed
out in other cities.
Mayor Mikels expressed that something could be done to keep out vehicles in the
easements. He supported the trails concept even though there were problems with
the trails at the time, he felt we should keep them and work out the problems
with the staff.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to deny the request to abandon the
trail easements in Tract 9440 and to deny Resolution No. 82 -118. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Mikels called a recess at 8:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:10 p.m.
with all members of Council and Staff present.
4C. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS. Staff report by Jack Lam.
Mr. Lam pointed out that Ordinance No. 170 had been approved previously; only
the Resolution was before council for consideration.
Staff recommended a rate of ten percent per annum simple interest because this was
what was being done by precedent already. We had allowed 10 percent interest
with the Mark III reimbursement agreement.
Mr. Robinson read the title of Resolution No. 82 -147.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -142
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A
POLICY WITH RESPECT TO PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS.
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 82 -147
and to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
easements. Addressing Council were:
*Hans Peterson, 5954 Dartmouth. He wished to maintain the easements. He
questioned the number of signatures on the petitions received by Council
since there were at least two people present who had changed their minds
who had previously signed the petitions.
He stated that maybe some time in the future they would want to make a change
in their tract to allow for horses. He felt the CC&Rs for their proTtrty was
illogical since everyone around them was allowed horses. As far as 1_2bility
insurance increasing, he stated he had talked with several insurance repre-
sentatives, and all had stated that as homeowners they have to have am insurance
including all easements. It doesn't matter whether these are horse easements or
utility easements.
He also stated that all the property around them is horse property. If they
did not have the trails, than the horses would be ridden in the street.
*Saul Cohen, 5938 Dartmouth. He pointed out a definite benefit of the trails
for use as emergency access. He felt the property value has increased because
of the trails. Also, some of the local schools are offering equestrian pro-
grams and there would be more equestrian uses in the future in the community.
*Janet Luke, 9160 Garden Street, representing the Ontario Mounted Police.
*Mike Baker, 5919 Dartmouth. He spoke of the nice horse trails in Industry
Hills and of the benefit to our community.
*Pam Henry, Alta Loma Riding Club. She expressed concerns that this was a part
of the trails system adopted in the General Plan. She did not want to see the
trails system become fragmented.
*Robert Nay, 5918 Dartmouth. He spoke against the trails, and presented a
rebuttal to some of the former comments expressed in favor of the trails.
*Joyce Cohen, 5938 Dartmouth. She has seen many of the neighbors enjoying
the easements -- walking their dogs, walking, etc.
*Frank Kovacevic, 9154 Carrari Court, asked what was an equestrian easement?
Mr. Dougherty responded stating that the purpose of the [moment was for eques-
trian and pedestrian uses. It is not up to the city to prohibit any other use.
Mr. Kovacevic asked if the homeowners could prohibit its uses. Mr. Dougherty
responded that they could, but it would be difficult except by errectfon of
something that would not allow vehicles to pass, but would allow horses and
pedestrians to pass.
*Mrs. Fuller stated that the CC&Rs prohibited any planting of shrubs within
the easements.
There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Mikels closed the public
hearing.
Discussion of item "e" -- Mr. Buquet asked the Finance Director, Harry Empey, for
an explanation of the item. Mr. Empey explained that the staff report in the
4genda packet was not for this item. That particular item had been resolved with
the insurance carrier.
The $2100 item on the public agenda refers to the item which was discussed during
the budget process but not authorized. He recommended that council authorize
the $2100 expenditure for liability insurance for the reserve deputies which will
come from the Liability Insurance Account. Mr. Empey explained that the money
was already there, it simply needed to be authorized.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to authorize the expenditure of
$2100 for liability insurance for the Sheriff's reserves. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0.
Discussion of item "f" - Mr. Dahl asked if we were putting the cart before the
horse. Mr. Lam stated that this was for consulting services in order to prepare
the technical details of the environmental impact report. We were not completing
the entire document. Before the Planning Commission can consider the document,
there has to be some kind of an EIR performed. This 1s only technical material
gathering of information.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve the contract for Environmental
Services for the Etiwanda Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report with
James Doolin - amount not to exceed $2,500.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
4A. VACATION OF UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE VICTORIAL PROJECT.
(Resolution No. 82 -131).
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to continue item to special meeting
on August 9, 1982. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
4B. VACATION OF CERTAIN TRAIL EASEMENTS WITHIN TRACT 9440. Staff report by Rick
Gomez, City Planner, (Item first discussed on July 7, 1982).
Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing to those desiring the abandon-
ment. Addressing Council were:
*Phillip Bullington, 9979 Manzanita Drive. He stated that in their tract
the CC&Rs excluded horses. According to the CC6Rs if the majority of the
people wanted to abandon the easements, then they could be abandoned. He
addressed the increased liability insurance for the homeowner and the main-
tenance of the easements. He stated that if they could not abandon the
easements, then they wanted to seek a method to maintain the trails.
*Macy Fuller, 9977 Cocoa. She expressed that this section of the trail was
only a short cut. There was a flood control basin which borders tract 9440
and perhaps the city could work with the county to obtain this for trail
use. The trails that are now there are used mostly by cars in order to obtain
entrance to the flood control basin. The horses usually use the flood control
basin.
A I OF ur c 1 OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE-
MENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR
DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 82 -08.
1. Acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Director
Review 81 -33 - Poly Plastic Products.
RESOLUTION NO. 82 -144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE-
MENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
DIRECTOR REVIEW 81 -33.
Request authorization to seek bids for reconstruction of Vineyard Avenue
from 8th Street to Arrow Highway, Federal Aid Urban Project M- MG- R194(2).
k. Release of Bonds:
*Tract 9290 - located north of Lemon, west of Hermosa. Owner - Vanguard
Builders.
Monumentation Bond
$ 4,700.00
*Tract 9589 - located on the north side of Red Hill Country Club Drive
abutting and west of Cucamonga Creek. Owner - James H. Markle.
Monumentation Bond
$ 3,000.00
*Tract 9356 - located north of Highland Avenue, west of Hellman. Owner -
Kingswood, Inc.
Monumentation Bond
$ 1,080.00
*Tract 9262 - located on the west side of Vineyard, south of Base Line.
Owner - William Lyon Co.
Accept reduced Faithful Performance Bond $20,000
Accept reduced Labor d Material Bond $10,000
Release Faithful Performance Bond $136,800
Release Labor 6 Material Bond $ 68,400
*Tract 9193 - located on the west side of Vineyard, south of Base Line.
Owner - William Lyon Co.
Accept Reduced Faithful Performance Bond $10,000
Accept Reduced Labor 6 Material $ 5,000
Release Faithful Performance Bond $69,600
Release Labor 6 Material $34,800
1. Set Public ::earing date of August 18, 1982: Environmental Assessment
and Tentative Tract 12184 - Town and Country. Appeal of Planning Commission
decision for a total residential development of a 32 lot subdivision on 8.5
acres of land in the R -1 zone located on the east side of Beryl south of
Base Line - APN 208 - 011 -49.
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road in Wednesday, August 4,
1982. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Jon D. Mikels at 7:30 p.m.
Present were: Councilmen Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, Phillip D.
Schlosser, James C. Frost, and Mayo: Jon D. Mikels.
Also present were: Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs;
Finance Director, Harry Empey; Community Services Director, Bill Holley.
Absent: Lauren M. Wasserman, city manager, who was on vacation.
Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve
the minutes of July 7, 1982. Motion carried 3 -0 -0 -2 (Buquet and Frost abstaining).
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. Mayor Mikels made a presentation of appreciation to Nacho Gratis, member of
the Citizen's Advisory Commission; Randy Grar.ia, representing the Cucamonga
Home Boys Baseball Team; and Al Newman, representing the Rancho Grande Kiwanis
Club for their work in helping to plant trees in North Town as part of the
Urban Forestry Grant Project.
b. Mayor Mikels announced that he would be going to Sacramento representing
SANBAG in the STIP hearings to give support for money for freeway right -of-
way protection.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
Mr. Buquet requested that item "e" be removed. Mr. Dahl requested item "f" be
removed; and staff requested that item "g" be removed.
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -8 -4 for $110,394.56.
b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Linda and Vincenzo Biscardi, Biscardi's
Italian Deli and Grill, 8661 Base Line, for off -sale beer and wine.
C. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Antonio and Evangeline M. Fernandes;
Antonio and Tammy L. Narcisco, Steer 'N Stine Restaurants, 8348 Archibald,
for on -sale beer and wine eating place.
d. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Ik Kyo Um and Michael Myung Yoon, Quality
Market, 10120 25th Street.
ev-- Regnen!- fond }ng- ef- } {eb4 }{ey- }nsnrertee- fer - Sher }fF= s- BepnCy- Aeserver {n -Ehe
elOennC- ef- $er }BB. Item removed.
fr-- Appeere }_af- eeneeee!- fer- £nvfrenmenlei- 6ervled -fer- the- £e {wendn- 8pee{f }e
P }en- BrefE- Env} renaente }- {mpee!- Repee!- n}!h- dewes- Bee } }n-- mnenn!- rtel -le
eaeeed- $9r400v Item removed.
gr--Aeeepeenee-ef- Bends- le -eep }eee- 6er!}f}eeee- ef- Bepes{!- fee- eff- s}!e- 4npreve-
menee --- Bwen- 6eflns- { { {- }eeeled -el- 8968- Aeehfbe}d- Arenne. Item removed.
Re{ ease- Ger!} f{eele- ef- Bepee}1 -------------- 66;509.99