Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/08/18 - Agenda Packet0 CITY OF RAV'CHO CUCAIN"NG\ CITY COUNCIL AGLNDA Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California August 18, 1982, 7:30 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dead- line for submitting these items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. . B. Roll Call: Dahl_, Buquet_, Schlosser_, Frost_, Mikels_ C. Approval of Minutes: None were submitted, 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. a. Presentation to Fred Steiner. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -8 -18 in the amount of $963,164,54, b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Brookside Vineyard Company, 13281 Arrow Blvd., for winegrower still. c. Forward Claim against the City by Yvonne Jean Allen to the city attorney for handling. d. P,esubmittal of Bonds and Agreement for Single Family Residence located at 13235 Victoria Avenue - Murillo. 1 4 5 8 • RESOLUTION NO. 82 -120 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 13235 VICTORIA AVENUE. E City Council Agenda -2- August 18, 1982 e. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and lien agreement for 7034 Amethyst Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOE PALMISANO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. f. .Acceptance of Parcel Map 7280 - Robert Mayer Corp. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7280 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7280). g. Request approval of purchase a 1981 Ford Fairmont from Hertz Rental in the amount of $4,645.00 plus tax. 4, PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12184 - TOwN AND COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT. Appeal of Planning Commission decision for a total residential develop- ment of 32 lot subdivision on 8.5 acres of land in the R -1 zone located on the east side of Beryl, south of Base Line - APN 208- 011 -49. On July 14th the Planning Commission conditionally approved Tentative Tract 12184. However, petitions were received by residents outlining ten concerns of property owners surrounding the said tract. On July 27th, Councilman Dahl formally appealed the Com- mission's decision and a public hearing date was set for August 18, 1982. Staff had met with the developer to discuss the home owners concerns. Councilman Dahl felt that the City and the developer had addressed the concerns of home owners, and therefore, officially withdrew his appeal on Friday, August 13th. • City Council Agenda -3- August 18, 1982 B. ZONE CHANGE 80 -11 AND CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 32 IMPACT REPORT - NEEVA. The change of zone from A -1 -5 (limited agriculture) to R- 1- 20,000 (single family minimum 20,000 square foot lots) and R -3 (multiple family residential) for approximately 65 acres of land located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east and adjacent to Chaffey College and extending south to Banyan. ORDINANCE NO. 182 (second reading) 34 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201- 191 -07 FROM A -1 -5 TO A- 1- 20,000 AND R -3 FOR APPROXIMATELY 65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON ADJACENT TO THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF CHAFFEY COLLEGE AND EXTENDING SOUTH TO BANYAN. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. • A. REQUEST FROM RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOBILE HOME (COACH) _ 35 OWNERS COMMITTEE. A request from the Committee to address the city council regarding amendment or recision of city's existing rent mediation ordinance. An oral report will be presented by Samuel J. Rodda, chairman of the Coach Owners Committee. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 7, COUNCIL BUSINESS. 8. ADJOURNMENT. • w RBNT CITY OF RANCFC CLCANONCA W IRR / YEN A V E N C 0 0. N A M E WARRANT RECONCILIATICN AARR JCURNAI DATE REFERENCE 0 /10/!2 DISCOUNT NET 0 RAGE I R867 CITY OF RANCPU CUCAMONGA WARRANT RECUNC(LIATICN WARR A VEN 1 V E N C 0 R N A M E WARR JOURNAL DATE REFERENCE V TURF SUPP OFFICIAL CUP INC C R PORATION IMES 4 INC. ALL TER SUPPLY CIS PURL ICAIIO IVIANNE MGMT 3118122 DISCOUNT NET 3.000.39 f6.pB 9.230.11 1.112.54 270.44 31.040.30 6.00 T5.6C 91.C8 RAGE 2 • • • R867 CITY OF RANCTC CUCAMONGA NARR A REM A V E N C 0 R N A M E 16004 BTT4 TCRR "2. TINO 16005 8790 TRANS -.EST FORC TRUCK IFCO6 B6B5 TURNERS INC 160 T 160 8 16009 16010 ItCL1 16012 Ito 13 16014 16015 16016 16n17 16018 16019 16020 1 e1 I 16032 1,023 16024 1,025 16026 16027 11028 B950 UNi1VE CFC CALIF IREGENTSEM 9060 URENA GEORGE 9153 VERMFSR 9255 WENGER, MICEFELLE 9290 .tST ENO UNIIEG MAY 9492 NILCUCK 9650 YUKON CISPOSAL SERVICE 9766 WILLIAMS PAT 9767 LARSGN. FNNETTE 9766 MATTSCN, KARIE 9769 PeaTlx. cL a rrS 9770 CL Fa ARCC, GOMINIG 9771 MAR SFALL. KAREN 9772 TALLMAN, MR 9173 YAKEi HAZEL 9901 VALE REINFORCINiZ STEEL 9902 LLCKE A SONS 1.90 9903 E6LLS IRAN SPQR I >T ION 9904 1GMESHI A SON. FRANKLIN VGIC FINAL TC T AIS 3 . • • YARa6NT RECONCILIATION 8/18/82 PAGE MARR IOURNIIl CISCOUNT NET DATE REFCRENCE 8 1IB /82 330.00 B/ a /F2 8 1lele2 45.C2 t0." 9/12/22 23.38 01I8 /e2 90.00 B /1B/e2 67.32 Ell e /P2 19].16 8/18/82 158.40 B /le /82 89.42 e /le /F2 83.34 8 /IB /B2 1O.00 82 M 14.00 B /le, e /82 14.00 8 /le /ez 14.00 8/18/P2 12.00 8/18162 24.00 8 /18 182 24.00 2 /le /e2 12.00 B /3e /e2 24.CC 8 IB /82 23.00 1 8118 /e2 38.63 B /le /E2 87.30 8/1 e/e2 16.44 8 /1B / B2 8118/e2 62.08 FINAL TOTALS 963.164.54 3 • • COPY till—Ill offi- OM. APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) to: Dayrlmam el JVI.W¢ Eewmge Comral 1215 O Sven ftB SQtMS6SII0 Snernmemo. Co'N 9$01, — . --- :. -- ' The undemgned berth, .,dLr lnr . .< UNme, demnbed m folf.— I. 7,E(5) Of LICENSES) FILE N0. "i111 �1ss Applied under 5<c 11010 ❑ EB.mm Dala_e_ OBOCY j. iYVF {$I OF iRAN$ACTION(5. RECEIPT NO _ .. • • / ' A• GEOOOGRAPHICBis Dale ls—d — ]. N"E{5) OF APKICANT(S) T.mp. verm,l fNeobe Dme ffE ;.pf B1`Li=1= INC. • u — %— Stock 7Yf. 51071.1 $100.00 Stook Ts1. '1/071.1 100.00 Do 9 y.,��..J A_ B�eY....l..e.. Comomm7 5.,LttOeOnon ell Rur,n — Number a•d 51.ee 12 U AZeaRFe91tA. — ry SNC� ,&C� (1Si41730�uA'� 8G1D TOTAL 5200.00 B. H vremn.. L,e.med. 1. Ao P-- 1-de sea.. TY➢e .I ne. 02/08 an U.N _ 7M L_kw gnddro (I1dde,qq.� n Iom5 Numb o d YOIA�EIW�1;i EW.�'0�t1, '� "�5`wi V. Hoot you — be*,I —i.led .1. Wolf? w IT a you <ra NW.N l nny of he pro.iuon, of IF. Aleaba6. Bere.ege Canirol Act ar regula,on. Of the Deparlmenl W. It. Appktnn oreo a (ol IFaI ony m rogv employed in _ _ Fw_ nll be al o Ik n¢, and (b1 II b mll nolol op_ (o be .1 Me No— of Fe Al.o4d¢ mConrrol A Il STATE Of CALIFORNIA Caan, of LIDO 0lImHiLw Otte S/0/02 II.n^ ep. •. ...nw. ., o.: NN. r...r.....e,.u...... e....v.... u...n., .w •w ..., . ,n. ,. .tiM.w J. e" u. APPLICANT J IDINC. l �R[ P• El EL0®0RSBPQ2 d 77'7z" 67"._ .! APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR A�/p 5, STATE OF CALIFORNIA C—' of ISOC 3earoard1B0 Pale ~~W � ^_ '—• ...... . ` � ' + —' Ip _NmIv of l— l f .L.i. renvAO •e _ ID Limnle NOmber(O _'J.��./AA AUG 7 1982 __.1i8j0j51lljj2I1j2_j9j4j08 wI....... l n.r aee Short, _ cry mod npCCode 1 31 Ar?'o!. A3 . __ _ _ _lEEac00 CmImPam Q1YJQ___._ SA0 B On A'of rvrir. Mmr Th,, Finn Tnr Orlmdmrnr I've Ool, bmwd le Pem•d•d rmin. Fd —i �.• Nco" paper.. n COPIES NAKED /0/ilt ... . . /•� ❑, bnereal Fee .1 told of .e. / or'. an R... No onro .ne,.nawer F �Elfjl� • • .• CLAIM OF ) CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES YVONNE JEAN ALLEN ) (Sef:;'Y9pi0 ":e €CIFio. "ve'rriirieiit, Code) vs JU I. wJ 113u2 �,y9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) AM ?(di9d�h�i */.;1t2(3(4(5�6 „ti;,• TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that YVONNE JEAN ALLEN claims damages from the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA as follows: (a) The name and post office address of the claimant: YVO;:NE JEAN ALLEN, 6723 London, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701. (b) The post office address to which the person presenting the claim desires notices to be sent: c/o BELOUD AND MANNERINO, Attorneys at Law, 9330 Baseline Road, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701. (c) The date. place and other circumstances of the occurrence or transaction which gave rise to the claim asserted: On or about April 27, 1982, Claimant was traveling southbound on Ramona Avenue, approximately 250 feet north of Victoria Street, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, when in front of 6837 Ramona, a collision ensued between the car she was driving and a vehicle operated by Doris Jean. Daniels, proximately caused and /or contributed to by a dangerous condition of Ramona Avanao within the meaning of Government Code Section 835, Subsections (a) and (b) as follows: Ramona Avenue is an improved street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. When it reaches the place described above where tho collision occurred, the east side of the curbing juts out into Ramona Avenue significantly narrowing the -1- traveling portion of said roadway; said unimproved portion of the public highway contain_ bushes, trees and foliage obstructing • the view of a private driveway from which exited the vehicle with which Claimant's vehicle collided. said narrowed roadway and the trees, bushes and other foliage blocking the view constituted a dangerous condition of public highway. Said danagerous condition created a reasonably forseeable risk of the kind of injury which occurred. The dangerous condition had existed for several years. Said public entity had constructive and /or actual notice of the dangerous condition for the reason the same had existed long enough prior to Claimant's injury, and was of such an obvious nature that said public entity, in the exercise of due care should have discovered the condition and its dangerous • character, and taken measures to correct same. (d) A general description of the indebtedness, obligation, injury, damage or loss incurred so far as it may be known at the time of presentation of the claim: Damage to her back with particular injury to her lower back causing nerve root irritation. Claimant is informed and believes said injuries may be permanent. (e) The name or names of the public employee or employees causing the injury, damage or loss, if known: unknown. (f) The amount claimed as of the date or presentation of the claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage, or loss, insofar as it may be known at the time of the presentation of the claim together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: • -2- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By an Damages incurred to date: • Expenses for medical and hospital care $ 856.00 Loss of earnings 1,428.00 Medical travel 39.00 Housekeeper 85.00 Miscellaneous 225.00 General damages 250,000.00 Total $252,633.00 Claimant is informed and believes that she may need surgery for correction of the injury to her lower back the cost of which has been estimated as follows: Surgeon and assistants $ 6,000.00 Hospital expenses 18,000.00 • Future loss of earnings, approximately 12,000.00 $ 36,000.00 Dated: July 29, 1982. YVONNE JEAN ALLEN by BELOUD AND MAN/NERINO by lRO�ert G. b c loua her attorneys Received copy Of the above document on A 1982. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By an 0 • n ►J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT BATE: August 18, 1982 19; TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Resubmittal of Bonds and Agreement for Single Family Residence located at 13235 Victoria Avenue submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Murillo At the City Council meeting of July 21, 1982, the acceptance of the subject bonds was deferred due to the uncertainty of the ultimate width of Victoria Avenue. Mrs. Murillo has been contacted by Staff and has indicated in the attached letter that she prefers the City Council to accept the bonds and agreement rather than a lien agreement at this time. Street improvements will be installed after the Etiwanda Specific Plan is adopted. An extension of the agreement or the acceptance of a lien agreement could be discussed if the improvements for Victoria Avenue can not be installed within one year. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the bonds and agreement described above. Respectfully sub�vitted, 1j i LBza Attachments • RESOLUTION NO. 'is'.'7 - I xL A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR A SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 13235 VICTORIA AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on July 21, 1982 by Alfredo and Clara Murillo as developer, for the improvement of oublic right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifi- cally described therein, and generally located at 13235 Victoria Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Ordinance No. 58; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby aporoved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said lmprovement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren 11. bbla sserrian, City Clerk C, J Jon D. Mikels, Mayor • • 0 CITI' OI' RAN('[ 10 Cl'CA \1O. \G,\ �Y/�i•�M /:r 'arstio� x ENGINEERING DIVISION T y °ivri VICINITY \IAP „ page PROJECT SITE VICTORIA STREET g.. 41 a Par. 1 N Par. 2°, Par. 4 i 04 AC 7 o 1 ^9 AC. `I I AC ;oc +' 3J) W 'u 4 c AC MA V Jg , (42i 93 qc� CITI' OI' RAN('[ 10 Cl'CA \1O. \G,\ �Y/�i•�M /:r 'arstio� x ENGINEERING DIVISION T y °ivri VICINITY \IAP „ page ?2- -zz Far 11 rl Os as -i I ti- Ile 1` 0 Ll eL n U <.' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ly °Y CrvW,rMm F_ Z Charles J. Nanuet It JamesS F.0 V" 'S Nichard XL Dahl Phillip D. . Schlosser 1977 August 3, 1982 Mr, and Mrs. A. Murillo 13235 Victoria Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 RE: Building Permit 13235 Victoria Avenue Dear Mr.and Mrs. Murillo, The City Council at its regular meeting on July 21, 1982 deferred taking action on the acceptance of the security bonds posted by you for the improvements of Victoria Avenue pending some clarification of the status of the street. As you are aware, the City is in the process of preparing a specific plan for the Etiwanda area in which a proposal has been made to reduce the width of Victoria from the presently designated 44 feet wide pavement (curb to curb distance) to 36 feet wide, keeping the right -of -way width the same as 66 feet. If this proposal is finally accepted and approved, it will result in a lower cost for the street construction and will be a benefit to you. Because of the present uncertainties regarding status of Victoria Avenue, we are asking you to defer the street construction until such time as the Etiwanda Specific Plan is adopted by the City which is expected to be done by the end of the year. Your plan for the construction of the residential building and the issuance of occupancy permit on it will not be affected by this delay. To mitigate the inconvenience to you, the City will make all necessary revisions to the street plan to conform to the Specific Plan criteria at no cost to you. You will, however, be required to complete the offcite improvements within a reasonable time after adoption of the Specific Plan and after you are notified to do so. Should you agree to this arrangement, please notify us at your earliest convenience. We would like to place this matter for the City Council's action on August 18 meeting regarding the above arrangement, 9320 HASEI.INT NOM. SUITE C s POST OFFICE: INIX 857 • RANCHO C(TAM NGA. CAl,lfDS >'t\ 91730 • (711) 999.1851 Mr. and Mrs. Murillo August 3, 1982 Page 2 If you have any further questions, please contact the Engineering Division. Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Qa �i.,, 0" RATHIN (SHINTU) BOSE Associate Civil Engineer RSB: j a a • • • Bond 1 1023584 Premium:Iil.00 CITY OF RANCHO C CAMWZIA 12 PROVE E:T MREENENT 181011 ALL MEg By THESE PRESENTS: 'that this agreement is made and mtared into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Cade and Regula- tions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Stare of California, a municipal c poratlon, hereinafter Referred to as the City, by and between said City and AL FRED: AND f.LARA N1IRAILLO hereinafter referred to as the Developer. HITYESSETR: THAT, idgi&L8, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the City of, a single- fam'ly residence in accord ante with the provisions of the report of the Coa l[y Development Director thereon, and any acndmnts thereto; located at 13235 Victoria Avenue. end. WREBL%S, the City he. established certain rmulrements to be met by said developer prior to Starting the final approval of the development; and MIMS, the meetvtion of this agreement and posting of improvrmmt a o urity as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Arentney, era does" tobe • semi lone to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing a aid approval; ROW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. Me developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all Improvements described on page 3 hereof within One fi) year frm the data hereof. 2. The term of thin agreement Shall be, nne f11 year , cmana mg on the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be In default an the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said tam has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provi- sions of this agreement, in writing art leas than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a stacreent of circumstances of necessity for additional time. Tn consideration of such request, the City reserved the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cast estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adJwcmentS thereto Men warranted by substantial changes therein. d, if the Developer falls of neglects to comply with the provisions of this aD rermc art, the City shall have the right at any time to cause e said provi- sion: to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said weeloper and /or hie Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so acing. 5. Encroachment permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prlar to start of any work wltlLLn the Public right of way, and the developer ':hall cmduct such work in full Cumplianre with the regulation. rontained tLercin en . Mon -cpl Lance any ".suit in stopping of the vork by the City, and n5sessment of the penalties plovidud. h. il, biic righ nstru¢vd t of way impravemene vork ran. iced "hall be ca le mlonnnce with approved Improvement plans, Standa"d Sp.eifi at ion., I Standard Drawings end .any +Pedal arlenlmrolv th uretn. Gan se n,a inn shill l,wtude any cranatt:aas ,nun: other ins tames; work dammed necessary for drama, of Public vefoty' t RCEl2A 1I/ Bond A1023SB4 Premium:111.00 Pape ! • IXTROVEYCNT AGRCENCOT 7. Work done Within e[istiin; street,, shall bn dili RcrcLv pursued a comple- tion; the City nl"Ll I, a the 109h1 to eomplcte In, ,bit all Wnik in the event of nnlns[ific,l It "II.ly L r,.l.le[Inn, mni to le.lor all cost aOil eal+enee incurred tram the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8, The nevcloPer h.,It be respensibir for replaumen[. relocation, or re- moval of any tompmnet, of any Ira gal ion v e r system in .on flirt with [he regni,cd work to Lbe satisfaction of the City Engtncer and the owner of the water system. 9. Tho Developer shall bu responsibiv for r ,il of all lunsu rock and other dcbrLS Erom the public righl of w v n suiting from work done oa the adja- cent property or within said right of f0. The Duroioper . +hill plant and mwin[aln pa rkwnv [tees as directed by the terminally Development Director. 11. Vic improvemnt s e ulity to be L m irnished by U Devclooer to sunrantoe mpletinn of the terms of this agreement .hill Ile subject to tbn approval of tine City Atmrncv. Tho principal annoont of said improvement security shall be not less than the amount O,en below: I7IPROVENENT SECURITY SURNITTED: Faithful Performance Bond $5,550.00 TYPE SURETY /AGENT PRINCIPAL ,A4WBT H,ilerial and Labor Bond $2,775.00 11 WITNUSS HEREOF. the part LCS Loreto have caesed tlmse presents to be duly aeaRed and acknowledged viih all formalities required by law on the dates set forth appusi Ee their signaturea; //77 DEVELOPER 6 BY: /.'v...•(!) O t7( Jt.. . DATE /�c� Z BY: ! X �C� �J / Ti�_ DATE: 7'I %'rF� WITNESS; /T DATE: CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, MIFORMA . .... ,,d,.ival corporation BY: IMYOR ATTEST: CITY CLCRA OAIC; • bead a1023S$4 Page l Preelum:111.00 CITf OF RXXV0 C�CNIO::CA COVSTRCCTIM: .1::0 ]O1:D ESTIMSfE • EVCRO.\CCIEST PE.MIT FEE SCHEDULE (Arcalh to "ins pe ctor'a Cup, ") OATS: 4/15/82 prMIT M. M,,,,TM by Barbara grail File Rarerence Parcel 3 P.M, 4590 city Dewing No.s 761 ROTE: OocS not include current fee for writing permit Or payment replace- . went deposits. L9b511tUCrION COST E l:=E 13235 Vi CtoriR r 1 L J • J; i W r'u - a'„ r.F. L. F. 600 AqnAp . \. f. flcmr(S ?IM minl L.F. 450 S.F. 1.75 80 0 fi" Drtt'e dn0ro,ch 5. F. 517.0 9trect Esenrazten 60 e. Y. 1.50 Inlror[ed Embankment 0.t'. Prenn n ten of 5nO rade S.F. • t. A.C. r t]11 TON 0 ton A.C. 1900 n InO1 [9001 [ON .i C t0 r n 1 TO\ !i G 00 rrl 1 TON • . Pn tcD A.C. [renrhl S.F. Ad n5[ Seucr C.O. to Grace G. Ad n F. Pa tv to Grade FA. °A. s"er, ci^ S EA. 5 [gee EA. 1 1 t COASTRUCI[OM COST SS.047.00 CONTINGENCY COSTS 00S.nn TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 5.550.00 FAITIIl. L PERFORMANU BOND (1007) 5.550.00 IABUR AND MATrR lAL BOND (50 %) 2.775.00 ENGiNRERINC INSPECTION FEE oee a (FEE SOWDCLE) MwpDTEVIDSION BOND (O \SII1 N/A sand 41023584 Premim:111.00 • FAIT:IFUL PERFOMIYCC sOVI) WHEREAS, the City Co Aj^PCeda anJ:�4aFa 4 c Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and (hereinafter designated as "principal ) have entered rota an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated , 19 , and identified as project sin le Tamil r i n d st T3235 YJCtaria Aye. s hereby reier:ed to an made a part Weida.; and, WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of _aid agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. Amweeo , THBlnF0RJl, Company principal and AN surety, are held and only bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called 'City "), in the penal sum of Five "On"" five Hundred fift Dollars ( 5.5 10.00 1 law ul money of the made, States, se the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind .ietly•and our heirs, successors, execu- tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. • The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi- tions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and perfored at the time and in the manner therein spec- ified, and m in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to tho face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendurcd. The surety hereby stipulates Ana agreed that no charge, ex- tension of I , Alteration or addition to the terns of the agreement or to the work to be perforred thereunder or the spec - ifLlat :::;:o i c- ,parying tho same shall in anywlse affect i's obligatrens on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any snch :11,ierO, extel ion of tiiaio, alteration or addition to the -j ten n', tho agreement or to the work or to the specifications. Li WI' ::ESS WHEREOF, this instrument has bSone 1{ 1l executed A'. t�C principal and surety above named, on � dmw•a Sn nav ;n.ur,vve 0omaen+ Ilv: whn E. aavue At large -ln -Fact ACE23 / / • Bond #102356+ Premium: l 11.00 LABOR i 9D !V TLRIALNEN FOND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cugan+n,ga, State of California, and Alfredo and Clara Nurilla (hereinafter designated as "principal ") have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated , 19 , and identified as pro- ject slog e- ami y residence at 13235 Victoria Ayr is hereby referred to and made a pare hereof; and, WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re- quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca- monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 13 (commencing with Section 3062) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3002) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates 'and "green that no change, ex- tension of time, alteration or addition to the terns of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here- by wail, notice of any such change, extension, alteration at ad- dition. LI WITNErIG ::UC11:OF, this inctniment has been du1•i rxocat,d by the principal and surety .,hove named, on .iu^_: 16.16. 19 6° ._ .ura:v_c „_L'�__ By: i,Tm K. n.i 1c At born,•.Y-in -fag BCEIG 1 �( NOW, TYEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material - men and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of Two Thousand, Seven Nundred Sevent Five • - Do la rs ( JJ]5 ), or material. furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or .or amount. due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hercinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3002) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates 'and "green that no change, ex- tension of time, alteration or addition to the terns of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does here- by wail, notice of any such change, extension, alteration at ad- dition. LI WITNErIG ::UC11:OF, this inctniment has been du1•i rxocat,d by the principal and surety .,hove named, on .iu^_: 16.16. 19 6° ._ .ura:v_c „_L'�__ By: i,Tm K. n.i 1c At born,•.Y-in -fag BCEIG 1 �( J • 0 nrmv nn n w,nrrn n STAFF REPORT DATE: August 18, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 7034 Amethyst Avenue G p cam^ "0 2r �yC a F� J 19ii � Mr. Joe Palmisano, property owner, has applied for a building permit to construct a dwelling unit on the property located at 7034 Amethyst Avenue, a public street. As a prerequisite to issuance of building permit as established by City Council Ordinance No. 58, the construction of public improvements such as curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees and street paving shall be required. The property owner has requested a delay in the construction of the public improvement until such time when the City is prepared to improve the entire block. He feels that construction of the public improvements at this time would create drainage problems which currently do not exist. The property owner has entered into a lien agreement to provide the required street improvements at some future date as determined by the City. RECOMEMNOATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution and autho- rize the Mayor and City Clerk to accept and sign the Lien Agreement on behalf of the City, Respectfully submitted, LBH. S.jaa Attachments ) • RESOLUTION NO. W—lit? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOE PALMISANO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public right -of -way improvements in conjunction with building construction; and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement established as prerequisite to issuance of building permit for 7034 Amethyst Avenue has been met by entry into a Real Property improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Joe Palmisano, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in • the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of Aucust, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren h1. Wasserman, City Clerk Jon 0. Mikels,, Mayor 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY and WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 -C Base Line Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this In,,_ day of Juiv , 1993, by and between doe Palmisseo (herein- after referred to as "Developer ") , and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), provides as follows: WHEREAS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit for residential developnent, the City requires the • construction of missing off -site street improvements, including curb, gutter, asphalt paving and appurtenant work, adjacent to the property to be developed; and N:IERF.AS, the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements until a later date, as determined by the City; and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said improvements, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct said improvements if the Developer fails _ or neglects to do so and that the City shill have a lien upon the real property horeinafter described as security for the Developer's perfor- mance, and any repayment due City. NON, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES Ia1RECi 1. The Developer hcrcb•; icrocs that that' will install off. site street 1n1,ludIoI curb, :utter, asphalt paving and • ipnu tm•. mt '.n irh., .n ncoorda nco and ,Iotpli,I, with all :Pplicable • ,rL nn nr�•,. •..: r.i d.i,s, rules Ind ...nc lotvms of the ,'i ty in effect It th,• lino If insl, lIIAti %:o. I'li :mnr,v,ncs shall be instolled of '03f „•:..n• ° :; :. , :,. n'.e., 2. The installation of said improvements shall be completed not later than one 111 year followina written notice to the Developer from the Citv to comment. installation of the same. Installation of said improvements shall be at no expense to the City. 1. In the event the Developer fails or refuse' to complete the installation of said improvements in a timely manner, City may at any time thereafter, upon giving the Developer written notice of its intention to do so, enter upon the property hereinafter described and complete said improvements and recover all costs of completion incurred by the City from the Developer. 4. To secure the Performance by the Developer of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and to secure the repayment to City of any funds which may be expended by City in completing said improve- ments upon default by the Developer hereunder, the Developer does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and convey to the City the following described real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, to -wit: • Tract 2126, Lot 5, as recorded in Map Book 31, Pane 45 of official records of County of San Bernardino, California, generally known as 7014 Amethyst Avenue, S. This conveyance is in trust, however, for the purposes described above. S. Now, therefore, if the Developer shall faithfully perform all of the acts and things by them to be done under this Agreement, then this conveyance shall be voids otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect and in all respects shall be considered and treated as a mortgage on the real property and the rights and obligations of the parties with respect thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the civil Code of the state of California, and any other applicable statute, pertaining to mortgages on real property. 7. This Agreement shall he binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and ,,ss�nno of each of the parties hereto. • a. To the extent required to give effect of this Agreement as a mortgage, the term "Developer" shall mean "mortgagor" and the City shall be the "mortgagee" as those terms are used in the Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute rertaining to mortgages on real property. 9. If legal action, is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sum which the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the right of the Developer to redeem the above - described property from the mortgage created hereby, then the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and such reasonable attorneys' fees as shall be awarded by the Court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY: DEVELOPER: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, • CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation �f /— ••'� 1 BY: SON D. MIRELS MAYOR ATTEST: LAUREN M. WASSERMY City Cler3 • F"ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss: COUNTY OF SAN 9ERNARO INO ) On , 1982, befcre c --ne indersicned, personally appeared JON D. MITE—LS, known, to me to be ahe :&-z-or of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. a municipal cor'ycrarien, and known to me to be the person who executed the within tnsaomeut on behalf of said municipal corporation, and acknowledge, zn me that such municipal corporation executed the same. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Evanaeure (SEAL) Noea ry Na -_ T_ pad , STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 ss: COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO ) 40 On MY 90 , 1983, before me, the undeesicned, a Notary Public in and or s2�a 1d County and State, personally appeared • " • • lgE�_AL•¢SR:D " " • * . ' " " " * * . known to me to be the su • per wee name i` s �sc ri a to the wrt.tn instrument and ac- knowson ledged that they executed the same. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOCdYy $1g RdCpLe X. L::ALLt'DCC Na W ey 1:z me Ty pea NOTE: When document is executers by a Corporation or Partnership, the above JUrAT is not acceptable. A Corpora tion /Pa renership JURAT is required. • 1/ IEEAW NOCdYy $1g RdCpLe X. L::ALLt'DCC Na W ey 1:z me Ty pea NOTE: When document is executers by a Corporation or Partnership, the above JUrAT is not acceptable. A Corpora tion /Pa renership JURAT is required. • 1/ U 0 n lTi AV D A TTlUA 07 Tr A A.Tl1TTPA STAFF REPORT pl 4 ' Oj r.. Q s DATE: August 18, 1982 U' U��' 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 7280 - The Robert Mayer Corporation The subject parcel map submitted by the Robert Mayer Corporation was tenta- tively approved by Planning Commission on March 24, 1982 to divide 23 acres of land into 2 parcels. Tentative Tract No. 11915, a planned development, has been approved for this site. The off -site improvements will be constructed as a part of this tract development. City Council approved Planned Development 81 -02 on May 5, 1982. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing signature of Parcel Map No. 7280 and directing the City Clerk to forward said map to the County Recorder's Office. Respectfully submitted, L jaa Attachments ,:i J 0 RESOLUTION NO. W -I V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7280 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7280) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7280, submitted by The Robert Mayer Corporation and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue, being a division of a oor ^_ion of 112 of southeast 1/4 of Section 1/4 of Section 11, T. 1 S., R.7 W., San Bernardino Meridian was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 7280 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 7280 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to • present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren II, !da sserman, City Clerk 0 'C: Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor 0 0 0 i CIO CITY OP RANCI10 CCG\NIONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION nn °' VICINITY MAI' P — page I ONXER, of VEIOfFR .� [NIRN[eR: .. . n LLA o ..1[IO rRRMTEo ' IERLII MRRR: �'�/ II • ..• I • VKIMII�YOYL V![YM IES L... ::.i 1.j1" •� � ' _ ��IT— �S�GTfTSTREE .. �-1. _ IEUNo 0 luj TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7280 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ' tUR1NNIN 1lEMiE.. /[YE SFC}IOM'1. 1.I S.N. 11E•S[Y. '•� —.�lft AHROWROUTE'HIGHWAI�F .�,�, V.. I ONXER, of VEIOfFR .� [NIRN[eR: .. . n LLA o ..1[IO rRRMTEo ' IERLII MRRR: �'�/ II • ..• I • VKIMII�YOYL V![YM IES L... ::.i 1.j1" •� � ' _ ��IT— �S�GTfTSTREE .. �-1. _ IEUNo 0 luj �`• /. ! �•: I l P6 rc el 1 i is L l l ,- W I•I III .i j — I ONXER, of VEIOfFR .� [NIRN[eR: .. . n LLA o ..1[IO rRRMTEo ' IERLII MRRR: �'�/ II • ..• I • VKIMII�YOYL V![YM IES L... ::.i 1.j1" •� � ' _ ��IT— �S�GTfTSTREE .. �-1. _ IEUNo 0 luj 0 • wn• MEMORANDUM August 9, 1982 To: City Council - City Manager From: Finance Director Subject: Pool Car Purchase The City received hods for a City pool car from various car rental agencies in two (2) categories, midsize and compact. The bids in the two categories are as follows: Midsize: Compact: Avis 1981 Granada $4,945.00 Budget 1981 Fairmont $4,995.00 'eN 1977 Hertz 1981 Fairmont $4,645.00 1981 Chevette 1982 Escort GLX 1981 Chevette $4,100.00 $5,995.00 $4,650.00 Above bids are plus tax. The specification for the vehicles are as follows: Midsize: 6 Cylinder Engine Air Conditioning Power Steering Automatic Transmission Radio Neutral Color Compact: 4 Cylinder Engine Air Conditioning Automatic Transmission Radio Neutral Color The overall lowest bid received was from Avis Car Rentals, for a compact Chevrolet Chevette. However, in reviewing the specifications and the type of driving it is felt that the compact car purchase would not be in the best interest of the City. Small four cylinder engines are high revolution engines and these engines generate a lot of heat and are subject to heat related breakdowns. With the type of driving (stop and go) that is done by City staff the four cylinder car would not be as durable as a larger vehicle. Therefore, Staff recommends that the direction by Council be to purchase a 1981 Ford Fairmont from Hertz Rental car service in the amount of $4,645.00 plus tax. This amount falls within the authorized budget amount of $6,000.00. L lJ 9 fill I Or Ht Iv av vUUA ... UI,UA MEMORANDUM A '-II z Ur > DATE: August 18, 1982 ' TO: Mayor and Members of the r�C//��ty ouncil FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner !/y SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT'ANO TENTATIVE TRACT 12184 - TOWN AND C UNTRY DEVELO ENT - Appeal of Planning Comm ssion ecis'on fora total residential development of a 32 lot subdivision on 8.5 acres of land in the R -1 zone located on the east side of Beryl, south of Base Line - APN 208 - 011 -49. On July 14, 1982 the Planning Commission conditionally approved Tentative Tract 12184. During that meeting, a number of residents expressed concerns regarding drainage, grading, and building mate- rials. During the appeal period after the July 14 Planning Com- mission meeting, a petition was sent to the City outlining ten (10) concerns of the property owners surrounding Tract 12184. After the receipt of the petition, Councilman Dahl formally appealed the Commission's decision on July 27, 1982 and a public hearing date was set for the August 18, 1982 City Council meeting. . Staff met with Richard Jaxon, the Developer, and his engineer to discuss the surrounding property owners' concerns. The results of that meeting are outlined in my memo dated August 6, 1982 to Councilman Dahl, along with a letter from Richard Jaxon. After reviewing the staff memo and letter, Councilman Dahl felt that the City and the Developer had addressed the concerns of the surrounding residents and officially withdrew his appeal on Friday, August 13, 1982. Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to call me at any time. RG:jr CC: Planning Commission Richard Jaxon a� MEMORANDUM DATE: August 13, 1982 TO: City Clerk and Members of the City Council FROM: Richard Dahl, Councilman SUBJECT: APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT 12184 I hereby withdraw my appeal of Tentative Tract 12184, Town and Country Development. I feel that the meetings between City staff and the Developer have brought about an adequate resolution to the concerns of the surrounding propery owners. Respectfully submitted, Af�I RICHARD DAHL Councilman RD:jr C 0 • 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 4, 1982 T0: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 80 -11 AND CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEEVA - The change of zone from A -1 -5 Limited Agriculture) to R -1- 20,000 (Single Family Minimum 20,000 Square Foot Lots) and R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) for approximately 65 acres of land located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east and adjacent to Chaffey College and extending south to Banyan. BACKGROUND: The request for the change of zone and the preparation of the Environmental Impact Report are the result of a request to develop 8 single family residential dwellings and 508 multiple family residential dwellings. The Planning Commission has been working since September of 1980 with regard to this project and the development of the Environmental Impact Report. Subsequent to the Planning Commission's requirement for the preparation of the EIR, the project has been revised from the initial proposed 662 dwelling units to a total of 516 dwelling units. In addition, the Planning Commission has held hearings and has recommended certification of the final Environmental Impact Report, approval of the change of zone, and has approved Tentative Tract 11550. The approval for Tentative Tract 11550 in contingent upon the City Council's approval of the change of zone and certification of the final Environ- mental Impact Report. Attached are Resolution of the Planning Commission on these determi- nations and the Staff Reports relating to the project. For finaliza- tion of this project, City Council action is required on the change of zone and final certification of the Environmental Impact Report. Attached is an Ordinance to approve Zone Change 80 -11 and a Resolution which certifies the final Environmental Impact Report. The Environ- mental Impact Report is included in the City Council packet. A compar- ison of the project exhibits within the EIR and those which have been approved by the Planning Commission indicates a significant difference in the project. These changes were due mainly to public input and findings of the EIR. Jv Zone Change 80- 11 /Neeva City Council Agenda August 4, 1982 Page 2 Should the City Council choose to move forward on this project, then certification of the Environmental Impact Report should be done first, followed by the adoption of the attached Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has recommended certification of the final EIR and adoption of Zane Change 80 -11. Respectfully s bmitt'e/dt, v ----UA AM'AICP Director of Community Development 40 JL:MV:jr • Attachments: Planning Commission Resolution 81 -85 Planning Commission Minutes July 22, 1981 Planning Commission Resolution 82 -67 Planning Commission Staff Report July 14, 1982 City Council Resolution-Certifying final EIR Ordinance Adopting Zone Change 80 -11 • • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201- 191 -07 FROM A -1 -5 TO R- 1- 20,000 AND R -3 FOR APPROXI- MATELY 65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON ADJACENT TO THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF CHAFFEY COLLEGE AND EX- TENDING SOUTH TO BANYAN The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. • B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. Assessors Parcel Number 201 - 191 -07 of approximately 65 acres, to be rezoned from A -1 -5 (Limited Agriculture) to R -1- 20,000 (Single Family minimum 20,000 square foot lots) and R -3 (Multiple Family Residential). SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1982. AYES: • NOES: ABSENT: Ail; UR J. RODDA get. "o—i - Su. 4S A 91 r4 35 _)t, 'n& 1- 111 ORDINANCE MO. 148 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CODRCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.10 TO TITLE 0 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICI- PAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR A MOBILE HOME PAM RENT MEDIATION PROCESS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, doe. ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Chapter 8.10 to read as follows: "8_10.020 Right to petitinn. Within thirty (30) days after a n n a eobile It.., ark Ira. Riven notice to the tenantsthereoi ofa proposed rent increase which exceeds the ,onunctier price index .me ..alined [a Section 8.10.050, the tenants sot petition the City to calla mandatory weer -and- onfer session between Me mobiLe home park owner and a committee representing the tenants for the purpose of disemesing the proposed rent increase and the reaeone therefor. "8.0.130 C.rnt "nts •,f netirion. Anv politico filed Our nL t., ., , ta I .11 �a.. . ,,.n ,II f the fallowing i n(o r.'�a non: c "A. TI„ "Chapter 8.10 1.611, h,1— park. "MOBILE HOME PARR RENT MEDTATION "B. The °Sections: o,ner Pl of en "8.10.010 Intent and lam,.... "8.10.020 Right to petition. sImher of spaces in thn "8.10.030 Contents of petition. "0. The "8.10.040 Filing and fees. "8.10.050 Preliminary processing. 0.060 8.1 10.0]0 Meet- and - confer se sa ion. • "8. Appeal. the not "8.10.080 Conduct and mediation. "8.10.090 Finality of decision. 18.10.100 I Judicial relief. 118.10.110 Remedies for failure to attend meet-and- nectar attain.. "8.10.120 Rescheduling and continuances. "8.10.010 Intent and Outlast. The p.r,.aa of this chapter is to establish a m andatory meet- and - confer process r between tenants and own of mobile home parka with [x,arr to corral . ...... ad rest Increases. "8_10.020 Right to petitinn. Within thirty (30) days after a n n a eobile It.., ark Ira. Riven notice to the tenantsthereoi ofa proposed rent increase which exceeds the ,onunctier price index .me ..alined [a Section 8.10.050, the tenants sot petition the City to calla mandatory weer -and- onfer session between Me mobiLe home park owner and a committee representing the tenants for the purpose of disemesing the proposed rent increase and the reaeone therefor. "8.0.130 C.rnt "nts •,f netirion. Anv politico filed Our nL t., ., , ta I .11 �a.. . ,,.n ,II f the fallowing i n(o r.'�a non: c "A. TI„ "aru vW ud 1 ' al dm 1.611, h,1— park. L "B. The name and address al the o,ner Pl of en mnhilr hnmc park. I.C. The sImher of spaces in thn mobil. hnme park. "0. The n.mher r,f 4r,,, h,,t, w t• re va mar no the 111-' the nn,[n• e, remL Inereaan was I:Iven. "E. ,A state lent of the nx4L1"1Z rent schedule and the not eel. "InI.. Ordinance No. 148 Page 2 "F. A statement of the rent schedule in effect as of twelve (12) months prior to be date an which the proposed ran[ increase would be effective. "G. A brief statement of the reasons why petitioners believe the proposed rent increase is not justified and a requeac for s meet- and - confer sosrmn with the mobile home park owner. oh, The signatures of and Identification of be mobile home space occupied by each tenant signing the same. "I. The names of a tenants' committee of not molt than five (5) persons, designating one (1) person as chalrpevoo. "S. The mobile boom park own r shall provide the petitioners, upon request, with such inforun time identified in A through F abase as petitioners require to complete he petition. •'8.10.040 Filing and fees. "A. Any petition filed pursuant to this chapter .hall be filed in the Office of he City clerk. "B. No petition tendered for filing pursuant to this chapter shall be filed unless the filing fee therefor, in an amount established by resolution of the City Council, is first paid. 1-3.10.050 Preli.lnary proccasing. Within three (3) working days after receiving a petition filed pursuant to this chapter, the City Clerk will review the same to determine whether a m set- and - confer sma.id. shall be required. A meet - and-confer session shall be required only if: "A. The petition contains the signatures of tenants representing more than fifty percent (50X) of the occupied mobile home spaces in the mobile home park. "B. The petition contains all of the information required by Section 8.10.040 hereof; and, "C. The proposed rent increase when added to all ant increases which v effective during the 12 months immediately Proceeding the effective dace of the proposed rent increase competes to be a on ¢1,x1mr than neventv-tive (75%) of the percwtnge by which the Los Angeles -Long Beach - Anaheim Area Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage. Earners and Clerical Workers. as reported by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, has increased in the twelve (12) months imediately ..[coding the dote mf the men, recently puhll4hed CPI information. "If the Cicr clerk deoamines that a petition complies with the r"gntromnnt< ,.f this ie :tien, the rlty Clerk shall 9e L•rr a dme, tine Ind P111c for d meep-and-rnnter ve4ximn between the tenant•.' c nnitrcr and the mcbtlr r, e home park nvn Whenever pn.vsible, the date srlrcted shall be at Ien4c ten (I0) Anse prior in she effective date of the proposed rent `- lncroa4e. The City Clerk shall, by rertiffed moil, give rettce of the meeting to the chair .... on of the tonants' rormtcer, .ind the mo bl lc home park owner. r1 LJ r • Ordinance No. 148 Page I "8.10.060 Meet- and - confer s rssiaoa. At the mandatnry e<[ -and- confer s seidn, the tenants' committee and the nobile home park owner, or a duly authorized representative, shall meet for the purpose of exchanging information, opinions and proposals with respect to the proposed rent inc [ease- The mobile home park older shall be prepared to give an explanation of the necessity for a rent increase in excess of the Consuner Price Index percentage described in Section 8.10.0506 and the mobile home park Owner shall also be prepared to inforn the tenants as to the nature of any substantial improvements proposed for the mobile hone park during the next year, together with the information that would substantiate the proposed increase. The parties shall endeavor to [each agreement on tatters Within the scope of discussion. 48.10.070 Appeal. If agreement on the amount of the proposed rent increase c a not be reached between the tenants' o ®ittee and the mobile home park Owner, either party ray appeal to the West End Mediation Board,, located in Ontario, Celifornla, for further medlatlon and conciliation. Notice of such appeal must be filed with the City Clerk not more than five (5) days after termination of the mandatory meet -and- confer session. A notice of appeal will not be received for filing unless it is ecmmo.eked by payment of 1/2 of the fee established by repo lu ciao of the city Council, which said fee shall be in an amount appropriate to compensate the West End Mediation Board for the mediation services to be rendered. • The responding party shall pay the other 112 of the fee within 10 days. 08.10.080 Conduct and Mediation. Mediation by the West End Mediation Board shall be conducted In accordance with standards of the Federal Mediation and Contiliaciwn Service. The West End Mediation Board shall prepare a summary of facts concerning the proposed rent increase in the event the mobile bane park owner and the tenants' commattres cannot reach mutual agreement upon a proposed rent increase. Such summary of facts presented by the West End Mediation Board shall be advisory. "8.10.090 Finnllty of Decision. The summary of facts concerning the proposed rent Increase prepared by the West End Mediation Board shall be the final administrative action upon any petition filed pursuant to this chapter with no provisions for further appeal. Such findings and recommendations shall be public records and may be certified by the secretary of the West End Mediation Board, If any, or by the City Clerk. "8.10.100 Judirlal Relief. Nothing In this chapter shall be deemed to preclude a —a, mobile ham. park terns, n mobile home park ovn.1r from seeking and ob.,irf, ug any app coprta to ludiyial relief. "R.10. 110 R .'ed r 111u r, w at Pm yet -. L-- If tiv trnanl x' .nittn, fail.: to ndri sclu•dulad n - md- fnnfur ,or a scheduled mediation ah ion 'el "rr flu, W-1 find Mrd,auan Bnard, 111.1 f.iry 1:1,6 ,halt ar.l er he petition it ion l.v,rd and no inf tM1 Cr pfnc a elt In vs shall 'r had hl ".o. Ordinance No. 148 Page 4 "B. If the mobile home park owner, authorized representative, fails to attend a scheduled meet -and- confer session o r scheduled mediation session before the 9est End Mediation Board, then the proposed rent increase shall not became effective until such time as the mobile home park owner, or an authorized representative, has In fact attended a rescheduled meet-and- confer session or .scheduled mediation session before the Nest End Mediation Board, as the case may beg "8. 10. 120 RncheautID� and conctnuances. "A. Rescheduling of meet- and - confer sessions shall be done by the City Clerk. Rescheduling of mediation sessions before the Nest End Mediation Board shall be done by tic secretary of the West End Mediation Board. Any such rescheduled session shall he held within fourteen (14) calendar days of the data originally set therefor. "B. A meet -ard- confer s e ssion may be continued by written stipulation of the temants' saeittee and the mobile home park esumn, or hta or her authorized representative and such stipulation shall be filed with the City Clerk. A hearing on any appeal to the West End Mediation Board may be continued in accordance with the rules established by the West End Mediation Board. ". SECT104 2: TERMINATION: Unless extended by action of the City Council, chic Ordinance shall terminate and have no force and effect three years after adoption. SECTION 1: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the Ciry Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its pa ssageauat least once to jht-2oil, R oReoort, a newspaper of general circulation, published In the City of Ontario, California, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 5th day of August, 1981. AYES: Franc, Mikels, Bridge, Schlosser NOES: Palumbo ABSENT: None ATTEST: /) l Ph llllpD. Schlosser, Mayor • F-1 L 0 RESOLUTION GO. 81 -111 A RESOLUTION of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMIRd, CALIFORNIA. ESTARL :STING APPROPRIATE FILING FEES AND APPEAL FEES AFFECTING nit CITY'S VSILE HOME. PAN( RENI MEDIATION PROCESS AS OUT- LINED IN CHAPTER 8.10 OF TITLE 8 OF TIIE RANCHO CUCAMONOA MUNICIPAL CODE. • The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1.0 Filing Fee A Filing Fee puraunat to Section 8.10.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code shall be S15.00. Payment of this filing fee will accompany the initial petition requesting a meet and confer session as outlined in Section 8.10.060. SECTION 3.0 Anneal Fee The Appeal Fee a s established In Section 8.10.70 of. the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code shall be 5300.00. Provininns for payment of the Appeal Fee are contained in Ser.tion 6.10.070 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. • PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 5th day of August, 1951. fAYES: Frost, 41ke1s, 8[lAee, Schlosser L NOES: Paiombo ABSFST: None C�% l Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST: ��yJ✓ — Lauren M. Pas se roan, City Cln rU • August 18, 1982 Mr. and Mrs. Alfredo Murillo 13235 Victoria Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California Re: 13235 Victoria Avenue Dear Mr. Hubbs I understand that because the Etiwanda Specfic Plan has not been approved the street standards for the improvement of Victoria Avenue have not been set. I agree that I will not begin any off -site construction until the Etiwanda Specfic Plan is approved and the Street Plans revised and approved by the City Engineer. The City will hold my bond until the revision to the plans can be completed and the off -site improvements constructed and accepted by the City. Clara Murilld SQ L J J W 2 W z W 2 W W Q p > p z F a Z N p w y � Z � O MONTE z x y z VISTA O= G ? PROJECT SITE LA VINE STRE LA GRANDE DRIVE LOMITA DRIVE s 0 U LA MESA DRIVE O r a MJ 2 W Q RESEVIOR •p I�r wp title; p ^r CITY OF RANCHO C 'CAJ1O \Gr\ A 70 met st ENGINEERING DIVISION w T 6 _> VICINITY MAP 1 \ill P R a e nimv nC D A wTrun!`TTO a MnM( a On Monday, August 16, 1982 authorization from the Federal Government to expend funds on the third and final phase of street improvements in North Town was received. The streets that will be constructed with Community Development Block Grant funds are Center Avenue and Marine Avenue both from Humbolt to 26th Streets. The approximate cost for completion of this project is $120,000. Staff hereby requests authorization from Council to seek bids for construc- tion. We anticipate that construction could begin by October 1, 1982. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the seeking of bids for construction of Phase III of the North Town Street Improvement Project. Respectfully submitted, LBH:j` STAFF REPORT .00' v /`F-,, a DATE: August 18, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager 19" FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Authorization to Seek Bids for North Town Phase III Street Improvements On Monday, August 16, 1982 authorization from the Federal Government to expend funds on the third and final phase of street improvements in North Town was received. The streets that will be constructed with Community Development Block Grant funds are Center Avenue and Marine Avenue both from Humbolt to 26th Streets. The approximate cost for completion of this project is $120,000. Staff hereby requests authorization from Council to seek bids for construc- tion. We anticipate that construction could begin by October 1, 1982. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the seeking of bids for construction of Phase III of the North Town Street Improvement Project. Respectfully submitted, LBH:j` ell, 61i1O C�^Y_ titled CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP N page 61TE ell, 61i1O C�^Y_ titled CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP N page C�^Y_ titled CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP N page Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, August 18, 1982. The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Present were: Councilmen Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Mikels. Also present were: Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Community Services Director, Bill Holley; and Finance Director, Harry Empey. Absent: Councilman, Phillip D. Schlosser; and City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Councilman Frost announced that the n -xt and most significant meeting of the Etiwanda Specific Plan will be held on Saturday, September 11 in the morning. B. Mr. Robinson requested that an item be added to the Agenda -- staff report Item 5B, North Town Street Improvements. Also requested to add public hearing item 4C, Environmental Assessment and Zone Change No. 82 -01 and Development Review No. 82 -04 - Lewis. C. Mayor Mikels made a presentation to Fred Steiner commending him for his bravery in helping to assist recently at the scene of an airplane accident. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR Mr. Frost requested that item "d" be removed, and Mr. Dahl requested item "g" be removed. a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -8 -18 in the amount of 963,164.54. b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Brookside Vineyard Company, 13281 Arrow Boulevard for winegrower still. C. Forward claim against the ity by Yvonne Jean Allen to the city attorney for handling. d. geew084Aaai of Rondo and Agreement' for stmale Fa241y peefdenee leeated a6 33235 Vketoria Avenge - Nwrf119. Item removed by Councilman Frost. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVR116NT SSGVRITY FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RSSIDSNGS LOGATED AT 43,135 VICTORIA AVENUE e. Acceptance of Heal Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 7034 Amethyst Avneue RESOLUTION NO. 82 -149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOE PALMISANO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. f. Acceptance of Parcel Map 7280 - Robert Mayer Corp. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7280 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7280) g, Regreek app"Val of papohase of a 3983 Papa Faimonk Ipew Repko Rental In tope &meant, of $4,645 plae tax. Item removed for discussion by Councilman Dahl. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to approve the Consent Calendar with the deletion of items "d" and "g ". Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). Discussion of Item "d ": Mr. Frost stated that we had received a letter from the Murillo's stating they would be willing to postpone the improvements until after the approval of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by uquet to accept the Murillo's offer to delay the off -site construction until such time as the Etiwands pecific Plan is approved and the street plans are revised by the City. Motion carried 4 -0- 1 (Schlosser absent). Motion: Moved .y Frost, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 82- 120. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). RESOLUTION NO. 82 -120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 13235 VICTORIA AVENUE. Discussion of Item "g ": Mr. Dahl wanted to know what the rationale was in selecting the Fairmont. He had been advised that the Granada showed a higher resale value and lower maintenance costs. Mr. Empey explained the procedure for selecting the Fairmont. After further discussion, the following motion was made: Motion: Moved by Buquet, sconded by Frost to approve the purchase of the Ford Fairmont at $4,645.00. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12184 - TOWN AND COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT Appeal of Planning Commission decision for a total residential development of 32 lot subdivision on 8.5 acres of land in the R -1 zone located on the east side of Beryl, south of Base Line - APN 208- 011 -49. On July 14th the Planning Commission conditionally approved Tentative Tract 12184. However, petitions were received by residents outlining ten concerns of property owners surrounding the said tract. On July 27th, Councilman Dahl formally appealed the Commission's decision, and a public hearing date was set for August 18th. In the meantime, staff had met with the developer to discuss the homeowners concerns. Councilman Dahl felt that the City and the Developer had addressed the concerns of the homeowners, and therefore, officially withdrew his appeal on Friday, August 13th. Rick Gomez, city planner, presented the staff report. Although the appeal had been withdraw, several were present to address the issue; therefore, Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: *Walter Ross, 7474 Lions Street, expressed his thanks for the change in roofing material from shake to a non - combustible material. His primary concern, however, was the block retaining wall which will be built on the eastern side of pinel, on the southern boundary of the property. On the western side of Spinel which is on the southern boundary, there was concern about the grading and what it will look like since there is a sheer cliff area which is about six feet tall. In previous years there have been numerous slides from heavy rains. He suggested that the City staff take another look at this area. Mr. Gomez responded that the concerns which have been presented will be studied in more detail after the hydrology studies have been completed. Regarding the retaining walls on the eastern side, they are a minimum of two foot varying to a maximum of eight foot in order to handle the grade transition from the proposed tract to the surrounding properties. Fences will be taken into consaideration at the time of final review. Staff shares his concerns, and these will be reviewed at the time of the final review once all the reports are in. Mr. Ross stated that they wanted all the homes constructed in one phase. To do grading in phases, he was concerned about the mud once the rains came. Mr. Gomez stated that the phasing of the project will be coordinated with the types of facilities that will have to go in to provide for the property drainage. Mr. Dahl stated that as the initiator of the appeal, he had met, along with staff, with the citizens and listened to their concerns. He also met with the developer who had agreed to meet most of the concerns that were involved. After he had received assurance from staff that everyone of the issues had been addressed, he withdrew his appeal. 4B. ZONE CHANGE 80 -11 AND CERTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEEVA A change of zone from A -1 -5 (limited agriculture) to R -1- 20,000 (single family minimum 20,000 square foot lots) and R -3 (multiple family residential) for approximately 65 acres of land located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east and adjacent to Chaffey College and extending south to Banyan. Staff report by Rick Gomez, city planner. Mr. Robinson read title of Ordinance No. 182. ORDINANCE NO. 182 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 191 -07 FROM A -1 -5 TO A- 1- 20,000 AND R -3 FOR APPROXIMATELY 65 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON ADJACENT TO THE EAST BOUNDARIES OF CHAFFEY COLLEGE AND EXTENDING SOUTH TO BANYAN. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 182. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Frost to approve and adopt Ordinance No. 182. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Frost, Mikels. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser. 4C. ADDED ITEM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 82 -01 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 82 -04 - LEWIS A change of zone from A -1 (limited agriculture) to A -P (administrative professional) for 2.045 acres of land, for the development of 28,800 square foot, two -story office building. The project site is located within the Terra Vista Planned Community area, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077 - 421 -06. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: *Ralph Lewis, Lewis Homes, expressed they would have the whole Terra Vista project approved before the office building was designed. He thanked staff and council for their help and cooperation in letting this project proceed the Terra Vista project. Mr. Lewis requested that they be allowed to withdraw the application and be given consideration of the waiver of fees. There being no further discussion, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by uquet to accept the request for withdrawal of the project. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). Ordinance No. 181 was not passed, but was withdrawn. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS 5A. REQUEST FROM RANCHO CUCAMONGA MOBILE HOME (COACH) OWNERS COMMITTEE A request from the Committee to address the city council regarding amendment or recision of city's existing rent mediation ordinance. Staff report by Jim Robinson. .. .. .._11 0�....., __ an m _ 1.. _ Rialto Redlands. *Art Greffly, 10210 Base Line *Harry Pate, 10210 Base Line *Ed adker, 10210 Base Line *Merle Harmon, 70210 Base Line *John Williams, Ramona Villa *Vern Maxie, 1400 W. 13th Street, Upland *Brad Downey, owner of Casa Volante There being no further comments, Mayor Mikels closed the public portion of the meeting. Mr. Buquet stated that he was aware there were problems, but felt it would be premature to make any decisions tonight. Mr. Dahl stated he was against any form of arbitration in the future, but was in favor of some type of Board of Mediation simply because of some of the loss of some of the benefits which were received at Alta Laguna. Mr. Frost expressed discontent with the current ordinance, and expressed a desire to explore further options. Mr. Dahl suggested that a committee be set up to come up with some options. Mr. Buquet suggested that this be discussed at the next meeting under council business in order to relay information to Councilman Schlosser who was not present. Council stated concurance with Mr. Buquet's suggestion to continue to September 1 under Council Business. 5B. ADDED ITEM: AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK BIDS FOR NORTH TOWN PHASE III - STREET IMPROVEMENTS Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Mr. Hubbs stated that funding authorization has been received from HUD, and staff was seeking authorization to go to bid. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to approve authorization for engineering to seek bids for the North Town Phase III Project. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS Mr. Dougherty had nothing to report. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS There were no items to discuss. B. ADJOURNMENT Motion; Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to adjourn. The motion carried 4- 0-1 (Schlosser absent). The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A thelet Deputy City Clerk